Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2018-01-09
C I T Y C OU NCI L W OR K SH OP M EET I N G M I N U TES C ity C ouncil Chambers 33 E ast B roadway Avenue M eridian, Idaho Tuesday, J anuary 9, 2018 at 3:00 P M 1.Roll-Call Attendance __X___ A nne L ittle Roberts __X___ J oe Borton __X___ Ty Palmer __X___ Treg B ernt __X___ Genesis Milam __O___ L uke Cavener (arrived at 3:07pm) __X___ Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2.P ledge of Allegiance 3.Adoption of Agenda Adopted Item 4:Consent Agenda Approved A.Approve M inutes of J anuary 2, 2018 City C ouncil Regular M eeting Approved B.Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of M eridian and B oys & Girls C lub of Ada C ounty for P Y 2017 Community D evelopment B lock Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $10,000 Approved C.Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of M eridian and J esse T ree of Idaho, Inc. for P Y 2017 C ommunity Development Block Grant F unds in an amount not to exceed $2,250 Approved D.Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of M eridian and Neighbor Works Boise for P Y 2017 C ommunity Development B lock Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $30,000 Approved E .Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of M eridian and M eridian F ood B ank for P Y 2017 Community Development B lock Grant F unds in an amount not to exceed $40,000 Approved F.Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of M eridian and Ada C ounty Housing Authority for P Y 2017 Community D evelopment B lock Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $55,000 Approved G .Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement to T HE E WING C O M PANY for the “WRRF T E RT I ARY F I LT E R B UI L D I NG A C RANE ” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $64,831.00. Approved H.C ity F inancial Report for November 2017 (F Y 18) Approved I.AP Invoices for P ayment - $422,885.48 Item 5:Items M oved F rom the C onsent Agenda Item 6:Community Items/P resentations A.Idaho Humane S ociety Update for 2017 B.Idaho Avenue Request - M eridian Downtown B usiness Association (M D B A) Item 7:Department Reports A.Quarterly Update from New Ventures Lab Approved B.Presentation of B id Results and Award of AI A 132 Agreements to the prime contractors for the “S outh M eridian Regional P ark” to multiple contractors per the schedule below for a Not-To-Exceed total amount of $3,857,861.72. T hese awar ds are the result of the F ormal I F B issued November 17, 2017 and opened D ecember 19th. T hirty bids were received for the fourteen different bid packages. B P1 – Knife River Corporation $1,587,382.72 B P2 – F ranz W itte L andscape C ontracting $ 710,327.00 B P3 – A nvil Fence C ompany $ 149,500.00 B P4 – L andon E nterprises, L L C $ 563,910.00 B P5 – Walker F ox B rick & B lock, I nc. $ 72,250.00 B P6 – Outland S teel, I nc. $ 39,670.00 B P7 – L eighton E nterprises, I nc. $ 37,190.00 B P8 – Signature Roofing $ 66,312.00 B P9 – D &A Door & S pecialties, I nc. $ 36,720.00 B P12 – S B I Contracting, I nc. $ 13,730.00 B P13 – L uckyDog R ecreation $ 59,750.00 B P14 – DeB est P lumbing, I nc. $ 108,950.00 B P15 – T V R, I nc. $ 26,300.00 B P16 – P ower P lus, I nc. $ 385,870.00 Approved C.C ity C ouncil Department L iaison and Commission Appointments 1. R esolution No. 18-2056: A Resolution Of T he Mayor And T he C ity C ouncil Of T he C ity Of Meridian A pproving C ity C ouncil President’s A ppointments Of City Council Members To Serve A s D epartment L iaisons, Committee Members, C ommission Ex- Officio Members, A nd City Area C ontacts, A nd Providing An Effective Date. Item 8:O rdinances A.Ordinance No. 18-1760: An Ordinance To Amend T he M unicipal C ode Of T he City O f M eridian, C ounty Of Ada, S tate Of Idaho, Amending T itle 10, C hapter 7, S ection 12(E )(2), M eridian C ity C ode, K nown As T he M eridian Impact F ee O rdinance F ee Schedule; To P rovide F or An Amendment To T he Police, F ire, And P arks And Recreation Impact F ee Schedules; And Providing An E ffective Date. T his is a second reading of this ordinance only. P ublic hearing for this item will be held on J anuary 16, 2018. Item 9:F uture M eeting Topics Item 10:E xecutive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(f): To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated and 74-206(1)(j): To consider labor contract matters authorized under section 67-2345 A [74-206A](1)(a) and (b), Idaho Code. Into Executive S ession at 4:48pm O ut of E xecutive Session at 6:16pm Adjourned at 6:17pm Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2017. A workshop meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, January 9, 2017, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Tammy De Weerd, Joe Borton, Genesis Milam, Ty Palmer, Luke Cavener, Anne Little Roberts and Treg Bernt. Others Present: Bill Nary, C.Jay Coles, Caleb Hood, Warren Stewart, Berle Stokes, Mark Niemeyer, Steve Siddoway, Mike Barton, Keith Watts and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Roll call. X__ Anne Little Roberts X _ _Joe Borton X__ Ty Palmer X__ Keith Bird __X___ Genesis Milam __X__ Lucas Cavener __X_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: I will go ahead and welcome you to our City Council meeting. Thank you for joining us. For the record it is Tuesday, January 9th. It's two or three minutes after 3:00. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance De Weerd: Okay. Item 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in the pledge to our flag. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Adoption of Agenda De Weerd: Item 3 is adoption of the agenda. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: There are no changes or additions to the agenda, so I move that we adopt agenda as published. Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 2 of 39 MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 4: Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of January 2, 2018 City Council Regular Meeting B. Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and Boys & Girls Club of Ada County for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $10,000 C. Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and Jesse Tree of Idaho, Inc. for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $2,250 D. Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and NeighborWorks Boise for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $30,000 E. Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and Meridian Food Bank for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $40,000 F. Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and Ada County Housing Authority for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $55,000 G. Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement to THE EWING COMPANY for the “WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BUILDING A CRANE” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $64,831.00. H. City Financial Report for November 2017 (FY18) I. AP Invoices for Payment - $422,885.48 De Weerd: Item 4 is the Consent Agenda. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda as published for the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 3 of 39 Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. If there is no discussion, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, absent; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 5: Items Moved From the Consent Agenda De Weerd: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. Item 6: Community Items/Presentations A. Idaho Humane Society Update for 2017 De Weerd: Item 6-A is a report on the Idaho Humane Society. Thank you for joining us. We appreciate you being here. Rosenthal: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Council Members. I definitely appreciate the opportunity to present some information on the previous fiscal year, how the Idaho Humane Society serves the City of Meridian and -- De Weerd: Jeff, if you can state your name for the record. Rosenthal: I'm Jeff Rosenthal. I'm the CEO of the Idaho Humane Society and -- De Weerd: Thank you. Rosenthal: -- again looking forward to presenting you some information on the previous fiscal year with the Idaho Humane Society's animal control work in the City of Meridian. Looking forward to the fiscal year we have currently entered into and -- and, then, as I understand it, I will be back in a month or so to talk about some future plans and what happens after our capital campaign, which will be another great opportunity. Well, I'm going to start off with just a look back. Animal trend lines from 1998 -- I think this should be encouraging to anyone in your position planning for your community. The news is all good in terms of animal trends. Dogs and cats entering the shelter system continue to decline over time and it's especially significant because during this time period we have seen over 50 percent population growth. We have over 150,000 more people in the valley. The Idaho Humane Society has increased its jurisdiction from unincorporated Ada county and Boise to now all the communities in Ada county and what's not included in there -- or what is included there in that dog number is about 1,400 dogs that we Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 4 of 39 transfer in from out of the area. So, as you are looking at your community and thinking as more people move in and we need more schools and more fire houses, what you probably don't need to plan for is more capacity for animals, because as we see this across -- it's not just an anomaly in Ada county, but across the whole northern tier of the United States as we see populations in metro areas increase in numbers we don't see the burden increasing on the animal shelters. So, that's good news and I think it supports the idea of consolidation of animal sheltering as we have seen happen here with the Idaho Humane Society. We also see it throughout the country where cities have joined together to form single animal shelters to serve multiple communities and, then, even, then, counties coming together to form regional shelters. As these numbers decline thanks to enforcement over time and spade and neuter. Looking specifically at Meridian and its stray admission shelter -- or its stray admission trends for cats and dogs, what it points to is a lot of stability. We don't see anything particularly exciting happening. Those numbers are staying pretty solid, to make up about 15 percent of the total stray animals we are taking into the Idaho Humane Society. So, in fiscal year 2017 we handled about 718 stray cats, 396 stray dogs, but additionally from owners -- from residents of Meridian we received an additional 195 cats, 140 dogs, rabbits, rats, Guinea pigs, parakeets, one domestic pig and numerous -- a few other animals in there, including some wildlife. So -- De Weerd: Dr. Rosenthal? Rosenthal: Yes. De Weerd: Do you delineate between feral cats and house cats? Rosenthal: We do. We do on the admission. We -- we temperament test all the animals in and over about -- about 50 percent of all the cats are actually feral cats in Ada county and I will get to some of that a little bit later in this presentation. Looking at all the sources -- all our jurisdictions for input by source, we see the trend also is going down with cats. A little bump there was actually from initially taking on the Meridian contract. For cats we see -- we are now at the lowest number of owner surrendered cats in our history. That's all good news and we initially -- throughout the year -- well, occasionally now have low enough numbers that we can actually reach out to some other communities and actually transfer in a few cats. Not very many, but that's a good trend as well. With dogs it's even more dramatic. Dramatic decrease in the number of stray dogs we have seen over time. Shelter transfers have become very important for the Idaho Humane Society. We reach out throughout the state of Idaho and bring in animals from other overcrowded, under-resourced shelters and even throughout the nation and we are also at the lowest number of owner-surrendered dogs in our history. And transferred dogs actually make up about a third of the dogs we shelter and approximately 50 percent that we adopt out actually originate from outside of Ada county. Now, in deriving our contract we split those costs up. So, there is Idaho Humane Society portion of our operations that we are funding and those include the costs that go into these transfers and, then, the strays are assessed to the various communities. So, numbers have stayed again pretty consistent between 2016 and '17. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 5 of 39 A little bit of a bump up. Sixty-two percent of our admissions were strays and animals seized by enforcement and 13 percent originated from other shelters and rescue organizations. Now outcomes. What happened to all the animals. We also have good news there. The outcome of cats in the shelter has improved with increased euthanasia numbers. Two thousand sixteen was actually our lowest euthanasia record -- year on record, but last year was pretty good as well. Adoptions of cats are, unfortunately, pretty static in our community. So, it points to the fact that you really can't adopt your way out of the cat overpopulation crisis. Other programs need to be utilized and in particular spade and neuter are so important. The percent of stray cats returned to owners is extremely low. It's about two percent of cats that we bring in from -- as strays actually find their way back to their owners. Now, a lot of those cats, as you point out, Mayor, don't have homes. Never been in homes. But that's the -- the national average is about two percent of that as well. Now, possibly next time we can talk a little bit about a new program that was implemented. It's a new community cat program that we received a large grant to fund and it addresses the cat population in a bit different way, returning certain cats back to the neighborhoods where they come from. I will talk a bit about that next time, but we have been up and running for about have a year and there results are really favorable so far. Dog euthanasia is also at an historical low and the percent of stray dogs returned to owners is about 64 percent of the strays that come in. That number -- that euthanasia number is down now below 500. I wouldn't expect that to decrease that much, frankly, over time, because there is certain -- there is just a certain number of animals in the community that I think will keep coming to us with cancer, with behavioral issues and so forth, and I think no matter how far we drive down these numbers we are still going to have a lot of folks that really choose to, for instance, drop off an animal with us, rather than take it to the veterinarian to be euthanized. So, I think we have driven that number down about as far as I think it's going to go with our population. And what specifically happened to the dogs and cats that came in from Meridian itself -- so, these are Meridian origin stay dogs and cats that came in in fiscal year 2017. We had a live release rate of 92 percent, which is terrific. That's really considered the definition of a no kill facility and considering the Idaho Humane Society is an open admission facility that takes in any animal, never turns an animal away, and that's pretty incredible. With cats we are at 52 percent. That's unfortunate, but it's also far above the national average for a live release rate for cats. Percent of stays returned to owner, about 62 percent found their way back to homes, and with cats six percent, which is actually pretty good for -- for cats. Percent of stray adopted 29 percent of dogs and 45 percent of the cats came in. So, good news overall for what happened with these strays that we brought in. Why do we have to euthanize dogs? Well, the most common reason is dangerous behavior. That makes up the most common reason why we just can't save a dog. When we have severe aggression issues with dogs there is very little we can do behaviorally to change that. So, aggression and bite cases and also socialization made up about 67 percent of the animals euthanized -- the dogs euthanized. And, then, untreatable medical conditions made up 28 percent and one thing you get with Idaho Humane Society is a tremendous veterinary capability. If you look around the country you really probably find there is just really a handful of shelters in the country that have the medical capabilities we have. We are very confident that we are saving every dog that we can possibly save at this point in terms of medical Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 6 of 39 issues. We have some treatable and curable medical conditions, like severe arthritis or diabetes that we also may choose it's more humane to euthanize the dog than to put them into another home. It's typically an elderly dog. Cats, a bit of a different situation. Forty-five percent of the cats we euthanized were feral and likely had never been domesticated or had lost their domestication and, then, additionally various behavior issues and contagious disease issues are much more significant with the cat population and much more problematic. And, then, the overall numbers can't be ignored as well, because although we may have a primary reason to euthanize a cat, the numbers coming in frequently do impact those decisions as well in terms of triaging cats. So, if we are seasonally overloaded with cats we have to make --we still have to make very difficult decisions. Whereas with dogs time and room is really never a factor anymore. We have more than enough capability to save dogs and keeping them for as long as we can, strictly in our foster program. So, different situation are -- now, looking at our field enforcement that we provide to Meridian, we had a little bit of an uptick in the number of incident and investigation responses that we conducted inside of Meridian. A little bit of an uptick in dog bites and attacks. Not much. It looks like about the same dogs that were barking in 2016 are still barking in '17. Cruelty and neglect, a little bit of an uptick there. And -- but, generally, a stability, not -- nothing to get too excited about. I don' think you have any disturbing trends or problems that are occurring in terms of, you know, peace in the community regarding animals. We are at ten FTEs for our field enforcement unit, which includes seven field officers, and that appears to be significant -- or sufficient at the moment to keep providing the same service. And, again, we do provide seven days per week, 24 hour coverage. A lot of information on this page, but just to tell you that -- or to reassure you that the Idaho Humane Society as a partner remains a very fiscally stable organization and fiscally responsible. We are also very diversified, but municipal and county animal control and sheltering contracts in 2017 equal 1,765,582 dollars, which was 22 percent of our total revenue or 30 percent of our operating budget. Meridian contract equals about 21 percent of the total contract income and we are able to hold our expenses within half a percent of budget, which is a good thing. History of the Meridian animal control contract. We started off in 2014, remained pretty stable -- well, through 2017. A bit of a bump in this next -- in this fiscal year. Current Meridian contract is at $3.48 per capita and I would challenge you, looking around the country, to find any comparable community or metro area that is achieving that low rate of animal control services. I do believe you can substantiate that you're getting very good value for the amount you're putting into the system here. The contract is allocated from our overall budget based on the proportion of animals handled and the staffers who are dedicated to animal control enforcement. So, for fiscal year 2018 our payroll is 3.7 million. We are allocating 1.4 million of that to our contract -- the overall contract. Our total for 2018 operations and maintenance is 2.2 million and 600,000 is allocated to the contract. So, again, based on those performance measures, Meridian contract comprises of 21 percent of that contract. It also turns out to closely correlate to the percent which Meridian makes up of the overall Ada county population. Contracts pay for the work that we, through looking at all the -- what we do holistically, can attribute to, quote, unquote, animal control enforcement and what is considered the responsibility of municipalities to provide basic services and, of course, field animal control officers. But we have many other programs and projects that are going on. We, Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 7 of 39 of course, take care of all of the relinquished pets from residents without charging our communities and transferred pets from other rescues and shelters and we have numerous special programs that also -- also benefit the community, including a growing education program, a pet food pantry that provides hundreds of thousands of pounds of food to Meals on Wheels and other needy folks in the community. Our adoptive program, which is a dog training program through three correctional facilities, our new whisker program, which is also done in the women's correctional facilities, they foster sick cats for us until they can be made ready for adoption. We have had this PetsMart adoption center, which has provided another outlet for adoption. It's actually being closed now in just preparation for having a new facility that will take on that role. Of course we -- we keep our costs down through fundraising. We have an amazing medical center that focuses on low income owners and provides care to folks that can't possibly afford veterinary care elsewhere and are a partner with Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine. We have a program to train senior students in medicine and surgery and we always have at least two students on site being trained through a contract with Washington State and increasingly, as our facility has aged, the majority of capital repairs and improvements, including vehicles and major building repairs and depreciation, have not been attributed to the animal control contracts either, something that we will be talking about some more in I think the next meeting as well and we are -- we are very excited to see our new facility under construction right now. It looks like we will be up and running in February or March in 2019. So, we have got some time, but this will be a facility that will really transform animal sheltering for the whole county and looking forward and excited to that. And with that I will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you, Dr. Rosenthal. Council, any questions? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: First, doctor, my apologies for being tardy to your presentation, but I appreciate the information you shared with us today. Can you share with us how many animal control officers that we had -- or you have as an organization and is there a percentage of them that focus solely on Meridian? Rosenthal: There are seven officers that are circulating in the field. At any given time there will be four of them in the field. Two of them specifically in the Meridian -- or near Meridian, but at any point you could have one of four able to respond, because we don't necessarily split -- we have six different beats, basically, in the county and so while a certain officer may concentrate in a certain area, the others may be able to respond based on what -- what proximity they are. So, they are always circulating in the field and our dispatcher simply figures out who is closest to the incident and, then, also on a triage basis how fast do we need to get there. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 8 of 39 Cavener: Madam Mayor, follow up. Can you walk us through -- if a Meridian citizen calls and says I have got a sick dog or I have got -- my neighbor's dog is barking, what does that process look like from the time they call until you arrive at -- at that particular address? Rosenthal: The call goes to our dispatcher. If it's after hours it will go through police dispatch and, then, be sent to an on-call officer. The dispatcher has -- it's a system that -- that the officers tap into and, then, we are monitoring at the shelter. It's an online dispatching program. It has all the calls on the board. There -- it will be an officer that's specifically focusing on Meridian at any given time. The call will probably be assigned to them, unless it makes more sense to assign it to somebody else based on what their call volume is and how close they are in proximity. If it's an emergency call, someone being attacked or an animal that's injured, animal in traffic, that's going to go to the top of the list and it doesn't really matter where people are, they are going to respond from wherever they are. Because of the way the roads work in Ada County, it doesn't always make sense for one officer to just simply do one municipality, because, frankly, it can be faster to get there from a different -- a different part of the county depending on how the roads are. Cavener: Madam Mayor, maybe one additional question. Talk to me a little bit about -- about timing. I have heard from some of our citizens who have been a little frustrated or concerned about the timing in terms of a response, thinking that it takes a long time for you guys to respond. I know that citizens as a whole always expect people to arrive much faster than would -- than is capable, but I'm curious -- if you could talk a little bit about what that looks like. Rosenthal: Well, again, it's -- it's a triage basis. Any priority call has to be cleared by the end of the day without question. There may be -- the only calls that -- that typically might be delayed until, for instance, the next day would be something like a barking dog complaint where we are, essentially, just -- but, again, that could also depend on the circumstances and the wants and needs of the community member. I can tell you, though, that, you know, our priority is to respond as quickly as possible and to clear the board every day and it depends on -- it just depends on what else might be going on, though, in the community. Cavener: Thank you. Rosenthal: We are able to track response times and we can run those numbers. Cavener: Madam Mayor? I guess I'm -- what's an average response time, then, for a call in Meridian? Rosenthal: Well, again, there is always an officer focusing on Meridian. It could be half an hour, an hour or two hours. It's hard to say exactly. I don't know what the average would be, but I could certainly find that out from our system. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 9 of 39 Cavener: I would love to see that. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Ms. Milam. Milam: On an average how many calls are you getting per day? Rosenthal: Well, there is about 1,500 calls that come through from Meridian per year and last year we did overall about 8,500 calls. So, whatever that works out to per day. And those calls are all tracked. Those can all be provided to Meridian as well and all the detail on that can be provided, including the addresses. De Weerd: Any other questions from Council? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I think what kind of had this whole presentation come about is because the police department had come on your guys' behalf and had asked for some additional dollars. You shared that on the slide. I'm bad at beating around the bush. You shared that you -- it looks like that intake is down. Can you share with us what's requiring the request for an increase in funds from the City of Meridian? Rosenthal: Certainly, Madam Mayor, Council Member Cavener. Costs are simply up and many of the costs of IHS are fixed costs and not incremental costs that necessarily increase per animal handled. Now, obviously, costs do increase per animal, but not quite as much as you might think. Idaho Humane Society is plagued by extremely high turnover because of our inability to pay a living wage to the majority of our employees and it's a real priority of ours to get our employees up to a living wage. If you compare county and city positions with Idaho Humane Society positions, you will see a real disparity in what we pay our employees versus others. So, payroll has to increase and, then, again, operations and maintenance just go up every year and it's all apportioned based on the -- the use of the resource between the communities and I think, again, if you look at those numbers and compare them, for instance, to maybe peer communities you may look -- look at in terms of what they are paying for various things, you will be very pleased at what you're paying for animal control services, particularly with the level of service and the care the animals receive, which is -- particularly when it comes to the -- the medical end of things and the behavioral programs that go into making -- saving the animals and the save rate is really extraordinary compared to many places that you may look at. Cavener: Madam Mayor, comment if I may. I just wanted to share, Jeff, I have made calls on numerous of my constituents' behalf and who have found the service that I received when I called into the dispatch to be nothing short of exemplary. I really felt Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 10 of 39 that each person that I spoke to was wanting to get the situation resolved as fast as possible and I just think that speaks to the -- the talent that you are able to train -- it sounds like that maybe you have a little bit of turnover. So, I just wanted to pass it along. I have always found my interactions with your organization to be great. Rosenthal: Thank you very much and -- and I think it goes without saying that animal issues frequently involve disputes between neighbors. They become very emotional. We do everything we can to really mediate situations, but everyone at some point or another has been frustrated by -- by an issue regarding an animal, whether it's the neighbor's barking dog or something else going on or a cruelty situation. So, emotions do run high and we try to do the best we can. Cavener: Madam Mayor, maybe one question, either the gentleman or for legal or for PD. What -- what enforcement powers do you have? We have -- previously Meridian ran our own animal control and so that was through the police department and do you have police powers? Rosenthal: We are deputized as special officers under the Ada County Sheriff. We don't have the powers to detain anyone and we can't issue a search warrant, but we can issue citations. We can issue -- we can -- we enforce the state animal cruelty statutes and all the laws regarding animal care and control at statute level. All the local ordinances. When we need to issue a search warrant we need the assistance of the police to come with us and we can't detain anyone or arrest anyone, but we have full enforcement powers otherwise. Cavener: Madam Mayor. It would be great when you pass on some of that data -- I would be curious to know how many citations that your organization has written within our community as well. I wouldn't expect to put you on the spot to know that, but -- Rosenthal: Absolutely. Cavener: -- something I would love to see as. Rosenthal: Sure. De Weerd: And I guess, lieutenant, I would hope -- I know this generally comes up during the budget. It was missed with the retirement of Lieutenant Overton and trying to figure out what all he did. We found that out; right? If -- Council, if there is any data that you would like on this contract that we can be presenting in June as we do the budget request and that sort of thing and if we can get on a June budget request type of scenario, preferably May, so Council has it in June, but if we can also provide some of the numbers that this Council feels important to know as we look at how the contract is going, what kind of service we have, maybe even special circumstances. I -- I still remember one of our animal control officers and the story about the monster in the sandbox and it turned out to be a badger and, you know, the -- the mom was horrified, because she had her daughter talk about this monster in the sandbox and she felt pretty Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 11 of 39 -- pretty bad when she found out there was actually a monster in the sandbox. So, it wasn't being made up by her daughter. I -- we would love to know some of the things that -- that does present themselves to your -- your animal control officers and -- and just a little bit more -- you're the front line, you know what you're seeing in our community and our community loves dogs and we found that in the numbers that we get estimated through our citizen survey. We are fortunately seeing an increase in the number of those that register their dogs and -- and that allows us certain information, but the more data that you can provide as we look at contract renewals and budgeting- related issues is very helpful. So, we will get you the kind of information we would like. Berle, maybe we can find out some of those data points that have been used in the past, so we have something to go from. Thank you. Rosenthal: Thank you very much. De Weerd: Any other questions? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Speaking of enforcement, I did get a call from a constituent who said that she received a misdemeanor for a barking dog and we looked -- I looked at code and didn't seen anything that would allow that to happen, so I don't know if there is a -- a way to look into that or should I have her call you? Rosenthal: Yeah. Call me. De Weerd: Did she get an infraction? But we changed our code -- Mr. Nary, when did -- when did we change? About three or -- three years ago? Nary: 2013. De Weerd: Okay. Milam: It's possible it was prior to that, Madam Mayor, but she's a doctor, with a misdemeanor on her record is really hard for her. So -- yeah. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you so much for being here and we will see you next month. Rosenthal: Thank you very much. B. Idaho Avenue Request - Meridian Downtown Business Association (MDBA) De Weerd: Okay. Item 6-B is -- is our MBDA -- MDBA. Nick. We love acronyms. Thank you for joining us. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 12 of 39 Grove: Thanks. Hi, everybody. My name is Nick Grove. I am the tech library supervisor at Unbound and today I am here on behalf of the Meridian Downtown Business Association of which I am currently the president. Just wanted to come here and introduce myself in that capacity and let you know about our organization a little bit. We currently have 21 paid members representing the businesses in downtown Meridian, which is an increase from 91 percent of paid members from 2016. It's still a very low number of the businesses in our downtown core, but we are working on improving that in 2018 with a membership drive. Today I just wanted to come here, say hi, and also ask -- or talk about the Idaho Avenue project. The MDBA, the city and MDC went into an agreement in 2015. The Idaho Avenue project put furniture, planters and a bike rack on Idaho Avenue between Main Street and 2nd Avenue -- or 2nd Street and we have been in consultation with members of our organization and also other people that are on Idaho Avenue. Through surveys, meetings, and our meetings with MDBA we are asking to remove those furnishings from Idaho Avenue and return the striping of the street back to what it was in 2015. This was a project to create a placemaking atmosphere on Idaho Avenue. However, the business owners on that street have not seen the anticipated response that we were looking for and so they are asking that we return it back to the way it was. The furnishings are owned by the city and that is why we are coming to you asking you to remove the furnishings and, then, return the striping back to the way it was, so -- De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Nick. Council, questions? Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Madam Mayor. Remind me. Was the -- the parking and striping was it parallel before we did the change or was it like angled in? Grove: So -- and before this activity took place it was parallel, but it was parallel all the way to the sidewalk. This moved the parallel parking like ten feet towards the center line and, then, blue lines were created from the parking to the sidewalk and I believe it increased the parking space by two spots, but I could be off on that. Palmer: Madam Mayor? And maybe a question for anybody. Would it make more sense to do -- I don't know what the term is -- instead of parallel -- angled. Grove: So maybe Caleb -- a response. Hood: So, Madam Mayor, Councilman Palmer, we did broach that topic and so maybe just a little bit more of the story up to this point. In November we -- we invited the property owners there on Idaho Avenue, business owners, to come here to City Hall to talk about how successful this project was or what the next steps were with it and those types of things and at that time brought up there is other options. So, if this isn't successful there is other options we could do with maybe moving the decking all to be next to each other and give some -- you know, some part of the block a larger area. We talked about maybe doing 90 degree parking -- angle parking on the north side. The south side has three curb cuts, so it doesn't get very efficient that way with the curb cuts Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 13 of 39 there, but if you -- if you did 90 degree parking on the north side you could actually pick up a little bit more. I'm not going to say everybody wanted to revert back to the way it was, but a vast majority of folks that participated that we have heard from just wanted to go back to the way things were. So, we have options, six or seven of them developed, and none of them seemed to get much traction or certainly no consensus on that, except for just go back to parallel parking at the curb. De Weerd: I guess this really does demonstrate the lighter, quicker, cheaper as a way to see how things work before you make permanent changes that are very expensive. Can you tell me, Nick -- I don't know if it's been part of the discussion, but this test case -- what do the businesses do to help make it successful? The idea was a place to gather, you can have more activity out on the sidewalk. What efforts were done to encourage that to see how much we can do to make it successful? Grove: So, the MBDA has -- both in 2015 -- or 2016 and 2017 planted plants in the planters. There has been some activity from a couple of the businesses having activities out there, but there hasn't been a sustained activity from the businesses as we had anticipated. There are two restaurants on that street, which are the -- the type of businesses that would typically activate a space like that. The -- one of the businesses has changed directions and changed ownership during this course of time and there -- there wasn't the sustained activity that really would activate the space to its full extent. De Weerd: Council, other questions? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Nick, I guess -- I didn't hear what the reason was that the MDBA wants to remove it. It sounds like there is -- currently there is additional parking for downtown, as well as -- I mean the outdoor seating -- what is -- why -- why does the -- the organization want to go back to the way it was? Grove: Some of the -- the two biggest concerns from the people that are on that street are that the street cannot be cleaned by ACHD, so -- they cannot get their equipment in between the planks that are there or the planters on the south side and so there is an accumulation of leaves and debris on the street and so it makes it more untidy for their customers. The second is somewhat of a -- from what businesses are telling us a concern about safety from people not knowing where to park or pulling in and out in incorrectly and so it's not as safe as they saw it before. So, those were the two biggest concerns that the people saw. Cavener: Thank you. De Weerd: Any other questions? Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 14 of 39 Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Nick, I don't want to take you off topic, but I know there were a lot of hopes -- and thank you for all that you have done in downtown and continue to do, but is there anything in the works to kind of replace this idea? Because I know there were a lot of hopes put on that this would make downtown more of a draw. Grove: We don't have anything to push forward at this point, but we are in discussions. Our organization will be doing a -- an election in February of new officers and so I would say that the new board will help direct that next phase starting in March. Along those lines, I would like to invite you to come to any of our meetings. We meet the fourth Friday of every month at 8:30 at Unbound, which is just across the street and we would love to have any of you come and join us on those discussions. De Weerd: Nick, you are always invited back and maybe to open that dialogue between the Council and the MDBA, it would be great if we could see you on occasion and maybe get an update on the direction that the business owners are going and -- and some of the events that -- that you're working on. I know your food and beverage committee has been active and just as a way to -- to keep them informed and engaged and -- and hopefully in attendance. Grove: I will -- I look forward to presenting in front of you more often. So, thank you. De Weerd: Very good. Okay. Thank you, Nick. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Oh. Mr. Borton. Borton: Nick, just to -- a parting comment. There is -- there is clearly desire on behalf of the -- the Council to assist the downtown however it can. There is a couple of ways that happens and sometimes if that happens, either starting from us or from some -- some planning institution that might be disconnected from the business owners themselves, to get solutions looking for a problem. Good intentions that might not work and maybe some of this might be a byproduct of that. But note for your organization and for the owners and share with them if -- if they have ideas rather than doing what -- what took place, but there might be a different option that they think would make their property and their business successful, bring it up and as an organization come and ask, articulate why that's a good reason. We have funded efforts to try and help before and if there is a better way to do it -- you know, the ultimate goal everyone shares is to help the downtown business and the existing ones thrive and new ones move in and the property owners, help them as well. So, if it falls onto one of the agenda discussions, know that there is definitely an interest on behalf of the city to assist if we can and we Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 15 of 39 look to the property owners who know best how to help their businesses thrive. Bring us some new ideas. Grove: Thank you. And we will -- we will definitely be doing that. So, thank you. Hood: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Caleb. Hood: Can I just -- first, I just want to -- I do appreciate Councilman Borton's comments to that end and I did ask the MDBA when they were contemplating what the next steps are with the decking and the planters in particular. I think we have -- I think we have got a place for the bike rack. Just to think about where maybe these assets can be reused in downtown, if there is a spot downtown. So, I hope that maybe they come up with an idea. There is just a couple other things and I -- I don't know that you have to make a decision on this right now. There is a request. But a couple of things to consider as you consider the MDBA's request that I just want to let you know about. So, when we put this in we did envision that it be that -- you know, a temporary demonstration project to see if it worked, with the hopes that maybe we found a cross-section that we could ask ACHD to rebuild when they did some maintenance on that road. That maintenance isn't scheduled until FY-19. So, if the decks and the planter are removed now, we have an agreement with ACHD that says we have to put it back, basically, the way we found it. So, if we pull the stuff up, we put some new paint down and order in some other paint and the parking hasn't really changed much, except for moving closer to the center line. But someone -- we would have to hire someone to go out there and take out that paint and put back tick marks to -- to redesignate where the parking stalls are and whatnot. I don't have any money to do that right now. So, if we do this in advance of ACHD's maintenance where they chip seal the roadway, we have got to do that ourselves. That's what our agreement with ACHD says is we put it back in the like condition. So, just something -- something to think about. There when I talked to them, you know, right now they don't paint anything, just because it's wintertime and the weather and whatnot, but we could -- could potentially ask ACHD for some help that way. They do have those materials and that equipment and they may be willing to help us out if we write a letter asking them to help us put it back in the same condition. So, just an option there that we could get it done this year or -- but it's going to -- it's going to take a little more than just some paint. Again, we have got to obliterate or take out the paint that's there. So, there could potentially be a budget amendment if we do this ahead of that. Just one other thing -- and this goes to the question about what have the businesses done. We did issue a permit earlier this year for Pauly's as well and I think that it was issued in the fall where it didn't make a whole lot of sense for them to use the outdoor dining and, honestly, I don't know if they still are going to pursue that in the spring, but they would be one business that -- that has shown some interest and there was even some interest from -- Rick and Julie were there -- to do some outdoor dining. But if the decking goes away they lose that opportunity, because the sidewalk is not wide enough to fit both pedestrian passageway and the decking. So, one final comment. I have talked with -- with both Steve and Mike about this and Parks is willing to store this stuff, Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 16 of 39 but not indefinitely. So, if it's something that -- we pull it up here in the spring or whenever it gets pulled up, a season or two or whatever they may be able to keep it under, but they won't be tripping on this long term. So, either we need to have an idea of what we are going to do with it or if we don't do anything within 24 months they can dispose of it or some direction to that point. They don't want to have to babysit this forever and ever and we forget about it and it just takes up room at Parks, so -- so, again, just some things to consider. I don't know if you're -- you're planning on making a decision today or not, but just some -- some more information to consider as we talk about this topic, so -- De Weerd: I think it would be helpful, Caleb, to -- even as Council makes decisions to remove that, if -- I think part of the options were consolidating the decking, so that maybe all the decking is in front of Pauly's to make it more than just one section, to know a little bit about what the options were, what the costs are, we are -- we are kind of giving up on this lighter, quicker, cheaper thing a year ahead of schedule and so didn't anticipate that cost to -- to be a part of it and to have the discussion with the MDBA on -- on that, because I -- I think that was -- I know that a lot of -- there is several key players that have changed since then, but with that request comes a cost and -- and we just don't know what the cost truly is. So, that would be helpful information to have prior to this Council making a decision. Because when they make that decision they are committing to the cost, so -- thank you, Nick. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Maybe one more question for Nick -- and I think it really speaks to your comments, Mayor, which I appreciated -- is, Nick, maybe a question you could also take back to your organization is if that decking -- it kind of speaks to what Caleb talked about -- became permanent and if it's easier for ACHD to clean it, because to your point I recognize that is a dirty street and I have always wondered why and your comments today kind of speak to that, but if it was a more permanent fixture that was easier for ACHD to clean and maintain, would your organization's opinion change on it? Is their largest concern driven kind of by the cosmetics of it or were other issues at play? So, that may be something for you to take back to your board. I for one am not prepared or ready to made a decision on this today and know that this type of discussion makes it challenging to kind of have that back and forth, but those are some things that I would love to hear from -- from your board is are there scenarios which would make sense to keep it for them or not. Grove: I will take that back to them. Cavener: Thanks. Item 7: Department Reports Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 17 of 39 A. Quarterly Update from New Ventures Lab De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Okay. Item 7-A is our update from New Ventures Lab and so I will turn this mic over to Rick. Ritter: Rick Ritter with New Ventures Lab. Did you circulate it? Well, you all should have a handout. The first two pages of the report -- the current tenants -- occupancy and the open space and, then, there is some updates on tenants who are actually leaving and where they are going. There is a list of events and meetings by the month and, then, I have attached the calendar that shows those meetings and, then, following that there is a list of the predominant users that are on -- that you will see on the calendar. So, I guess I can give you a little summary. There are currently 12 companies that employ 29 people on site. An additional 44 either employees or contractors that are not in Meridian and, in fact, more than half of those are outside the United States. So, there is total employment there of about 73 people and that doesn't count the people that are down in the open space. The one thing I think you will find interesting about the open space is there is -- of the companies that are in that space only one is a -- is a Meridian company and the rest are all companies that are based in -- someplace else and they have an employee here in Meridian using the open space as -- primarily as their office space here. A little bit on the update as it will relate to a couple of comments I will make. Cooper Plumbing became a tenant 2017. They moved out at the end of December. They grew from one person to eight people and five vehicles and they purchased a shop in Nampa and moved out at the end of the month -- at the end of December. Marcus Soldier was a software company working with local realtors and they moved into some lower cost -- free office space at one of the -- at Involta. So, they are still in the -- in the market. Trout Jousters will move sometime in February and this probably is where I make some additional comment and maybe a little bit of -- and this applies to both Trout Jousters and Trash 11. So, we have been hours trying to find someplace to locate them and they really want to stay in downtown Meridian and we -- and even to the point of -- he was ready to purchase if we could find something to purchase and we had -- took a run at three different purchases and we were a day late and a dollar short on all three of those. He finally settled on a space on Overland between Locust Grove and Eagle Road turns. It turns out it was the same lady that bought all the property in downtime Meridian and he is going to lease from her and, in fact, we may actually get him back in the old chiropractor's office, because there was some conversation about whether he's out there or he ends up down in the old office on Pine and I think that goes to the conversation that -- and you probably heard this from me and from others -- that we have a definite need for office space in downtown and anything we can do to encourage that, facilitate that, would be useful, particularly as I have more people that get ready to leave the place, almost all of it will be office based and I hate to see those companies that we -- that started and grew in New Venture Lab be someplace other than downtown. So, that's an issue. So, whatever you can do to -- and when you get -- when you see office space, please, call me and tell me, because I have got people not only -- that are -- would be tenants here, but I have also got -- on a pretty regular basis I get people that come in looking for office space in downtown Meridian and they don't fit where we are at. So, having some place Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 18 of 39 to send them would be useful. One interesting development -- oh. And I do have a waiting list. I have got three companies -- four companies, actually, that are on a waiting list for office space. When Trout Jousters moves in February I have got people ready to move into that one and I have got another I think that will probably move out in March and I think it's likely that that will be full. We got to full occupancy in November and, then, it appears to me that we will probably be at that and a waiting list from here on out, just the way things are -- seem to be working. Any questions on that piece? De Weerd: Council, any questions? Ritter: On the event -- the events and meetings, we have had a lot of events. Two hundred and forty-three. And more than 60 percent of that is attributed to the Treasure Valley Children's Theater. As you look at the calendar you can see they are a pretty busy bunch and I might add that that's not even all of the stuff, because they are actually still doing stuff in three other churches in Meridian. So, while we have got a share of it, it's also taking place in other places. And, then, the -- you can see the others that are -- most of our -- most of our business in the event meeting space part of it is -- are things that meet monthly and I have put a list there on the monthly piece of it. And, then, the last piece is the financials and you will see revenue, expenses and gross profit. Questions? De Weerd: Thank you, Rick. Council, any questions? Little Roberts: Not a question, but just a statement. Thank you so much. I know how much hard work you have put into this and having those businesses downtown -- hopefully we can find space for. If they are not downtown, we can't find them space downtown, but thank you for getting them down there and growing them and all the hard work that you put into it. This is -- has been a vision for a long time and you have definitely brought it to fruition. So, thank you, Rick. Ritter: You're welcome. I might mentioned that I had a little short conversation with Caleb. I had a local business that had come in that's got -- that owns some property on State Street and we were -- he came in just to visit about what we were doing in the lab and I told him about the shortage of office space and he said, hmm, because two of these I guess are rentals and he -- I think he wants to get out of the rental business and so we had a -- a pretty decent conversation about the opportunity to do something with those in terms of office space. So, I'm going to connect him and Caleb and we are going to see if we can work them through the process and maybe get some conversion in some of that. I think that may be our only hope, because we seem to be struggling with, you know, getting an office building built in downtown Meridian and so I think we may have to -- that may be our only outlet for a little bit. De Weerd: Until construction costs come down slightly, huh? Any other questions? Bernt: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 19 of 39 De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. It wasn't Bird. Bernt. Bernt: That's okay. I'm new to this Council and just give me like a 30 second synopsis of what exactly you do over there. Ritter: So -- Bernt: Or a minute. Ritter: So, what I -- so, we are titled a hybrid co-working space, which means that we do -- we have open space, co-working space, which is -- you want to work for an hour or two hours or five hours during the day and you would rather be someplace other than a coffee shop, we have got tables and chairs set up in one section where you come in and grab a table and chairs. There is conference rooms. There is coffee. There is all of that. The balance of the -- so, that's a fairly significant part of this base. The second piece is all of the office spaces there is used like incubator space. And, then, the third piece is the -- is the -- what we call the events and meetings and we have three conference rooms that will go -- the smallest one you can do up to six, the next one is up to ten, the next is up to 20, and, then, we have what used to be the old -- the Council chambers, which is our bigger event space and we do meetings and events. All that's available to the people that are in the facility, but we, then, rent that out -- or not in all cases, but make it available to the community for what we call a collaboration, engagement center. Bernt: Madam Mayor? So, where does the bulk amount of your revenue come from? Ritter: Where does -- excuse me? Bernt: The bulk of your revenue come from. Ritter: The lion's share of it comes from the office space. You know, we make -- probably -- if you look at the revenue and run the percentages at this time, probably less than 20 percent of it comes from events and meeting rooms. And a lot of that is because we -- we attract a lot of nonprofits. For instance, all of the media groups that we have in there, those are all -- you know, they are -- my rule of thumb is -- is if somebody wants to hold a meeting and they are making money, I'm making money. If you're coming in and you're not making money, you know, like the American Cancer Society or the Chamber, folks like that, then, I do that as a community service. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Rick, could you tell us a little bit about Aaron Stanton. He's been a resident for a couple of weeks. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 20 of 39 Ritter: Oh. I skipped that, didn't I? I didn't get to that. So, one of the things we think is going to be a little bit -- we will do something to increase not only the foot traffic, but also the attraction of different ideas. For those that don't know, I spent -- before I came to Meridian I was with the Water Cooler in downtown Boise for six years and one of the -- the success story that came out of the Water Cooler was a company called Book Lamp that sold to Apple and Aaron has been at Apple for now almost six years and, in fact, actually, I left Apple in May and is now doing -- working with two venture capitalists in San Jose around virtual reality and augmented reality and, in fact, has launched a company that's a virtual reality game company and I have always had -- in the back of my head thought he's going to come back to Boise at some time or back to the Treasury Valley at some time, only he gave me a call at Christmastime and said, hey, I want to come up and -- I'm going to be in town and I want to have a conversation. So, he came out and the conversation we had was that he wanted to come to New Ventures Lab two weeks out of the month -- so, he will come up here from San Jose, spend two weeks out of the month, primarily work on the VA -- AR business that he is trying to develop and that he would be open to at least a portion of that time doing open office hours for entrepreneurs, not only in New Ventures Lab, but in the Treasure Valley. So, we will -- you will start to see advertisements about open office hours for Aaron Stanton and that's -- that's what it is. So, that's our -- that will be our entrepreneur and residence program. Little Roberts: Thank you. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Rick, in your report you indicated that a business move to free office space in Boise. Is that prevalent? Is that a unique anomaly in that there is free space for businesses or is that something that is I guess also a concern or a competitor of what you offer? Ritter: I wouldn't -- I guess I consider that to be more of an anomaly. It just so happened that he has a really good relationship with people that run Involta and he's got servers located -- because he does big data search and stuff and I think what's going on is because he's paying for all of the servers that he's got in the building, when this deal with the realtors collapsed, they said they didn't want all that business to go away and they thought, well, maybe give him one of these spare offices that we have got, because they had got a lot of spare offices in that -- for those that haven't heard of that building, there are probably a half a dozen open offices there all the time and so they gave him one of those. So, I think it's an anomaly. And, you know, we -- we spent time working with the -- the Involta guys and talking to them and touring the facility and I -- no, I wouldn't consider that to be a competitor. Cavener: Madam Mayor, follow up. Rich, talk me through a little bit about this piece that I -- because this is not my subject matter expertise, but if I'm located, you know, at the lab and I have grown my business and I'm paying a really affordable low cost rate to Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 21 of 39 be in your facility, but now I have got to leave -- or I don't have to, but I need to leave because of growth space, but it's a huge lift in terms of cost, is that something that your tenants experience and how do they mitigate that? Because I -- I guess I get concerned that we -- we have this great, cool concept that is almost prohibiting their ability, because they are not prepared for the real world costs of being out -- outside of your lab. If it's almost counterproductive. So, I guess maybe if you can give me some insight on that piece. To me it's -- could you just help me get a good understanding about what's going on in our business community. Ritter: Sure. Well, let me start by saying it is not a surprise to them when they leave there. There is high potential their rent will be at least double what they are paying. You know, part of the whole process that we take them through is building not only the -- the product market fit, but also the business model and understanding that, you know, what you're paying in rent today being at the lab is -- is on the lower end of the commercial market even in downtown Meridian and not even in the commercial market in downtown Boise. Cavener: Right. Ritter: And so one of the things that we focus on as we build -- particularly the financial model is an understanding of the real cost that they are going experience, because most of them -- you know, we furnish printers and we furnish paper. We do janitorial. We do all that stuff that is going to be on them when they move out. So, we spend a lot of time working through what those financial models look like in -- you know, it's one thing to see what it looks like in the lab. It's a whole other thing to see what it looks like in what I refer to as the real world. Cavener: Sure. Ritter: So -- so, they are very cognizant and, like I said, with Trout Jousters, you know, he actually -- after he had been out a couple of weeks sort of looking around, he came back and he said, geez, I have got a deal here. He said, you know, you ought to be getting 600 dollars a month for that 400 dollar space that I'm in and I said if I would have charged you 600 dollars a month at the beginning you wouldn't be here. And that's -- and that's kind of the way -- in fact, if he had been around another two months he was due -- because the other thing we do is we do escalation at the end of each year and so -- and we don't intend -- you know, our goal would be to have people out certainly no later than the fourth year, but if -- like in Travis' case where it came a little sooner than that, we are working all the time to get them ready to go into the market, you know, and particularly around leasing equipment and leasing buildings and -- and dealing with phone companies and all of that sort of stuff -- is all stuff that we are helping them with. So, they are not babes in the woods when it comes time to leave. Cavener: Madam Mayor. So, Rick, I think this is a cool concept. I'm not an expert. You are the expert. Do you think this model is successful and that the lab is deemed a success right now? Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 22 of 39 Ritter: So, let me share with you a comment I got about a month before we actually opened a lab in June. I was in downtown Boise -- at a meeting in downtown Boise and -- and one of the folks that's still -- I won't mention any names, because he's still in downtown Boise, said, Ritter, you're absolutely crazy, because there isn't anybody out there that's starting a business. There are no millennials, it will never work. And here we are three years later and I have got as many -- almost as many millennials in the -- in our lab as they have got at Trailhead and I have got a waiting list of four companies. So, I will let you judge is it successful. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Madam Mayor. Rick. I think busy for sure, but is -- is it successful? Are these companies -- I mean we have got -- just some examples here on your updates where all but one of them that have left or -- in other cities and one of them might be in Meridian in February. Or do we have any companies that -- I mean this is property that the city owns, that we are holding back from being on the tax rolls, to, hopefully, get some -- allow some businesses to begin or to grow to -- to be here, to be benefiting our citizens, since they own the building. Is that successful? Or is it busy? De Weerd: I think in September our community development update -- or maybe it was August -- Brenda talked about the low vacancy rates at historical levels and I think Rick has done everything he can to find space for these companies, but it's -- it's a rare commodity right now and that's what -- where I believe that Brenda has been working with some of our -- our employment centers, our office developments to do spec buildings, so we do have a place to put these -- these businesses. The fact that they are growing big enough to want to launch out -- we don't have a space for them to launch out into Meridian. Palmer: Madam Mayor? Madam Mayor, then, if we don't have somewhere to put them, if there is not a strong enough market for office space that people are out building spec office buildings, is it the best use of the building now to just kind of be hanging out waiting? De Weerd: I -- I guess the overall goal has been to help incubate and encourage entrepreneurial success and that this was a launch and certainly the -- the intent has always been to launch into downtown Meridian and there have been several projects that we had thought they could launch into that haven't come to fruition. So, I think the success and the intent behind the new venture lab is -- has shown it's successful in the launches that they have had. We just need to continue to work with our commercial real estate developers and get places that they can launch into. Ritter: Madam Mayor? So, Councilman Palmer I think -- the other part of the answer there is the first piece is the fact that we are -- those companies that are in there now Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 23 of 39 employ 29 employees that weren't in downtown Meridian before and so that's one piece. The second piece is when -- when we negotiated this deal, what, three, three and a half years ago, one of the things that I said to the Council, then, was and -- and, in fact, I asked for a five year lease and they said, no, we will give you a three year lease and, then, they wanted to know, well, how soon are you going to have companies coming out of there and I said, well, based on my experience at the Water Cooler, the tech center, and the innovation center, it will be late in the third year and early in the fourth year before we have anything of -- of substance come out of there. We are ahead of that schedule. The problem is -- and I addressed the problem when we first did this. I said the big problem we have got -- because as I looked at putting this together, I came back and I said to the Council, my bigger concern is that there is no place -- absolutely no place to put these companies when -- if and when they graduate. That part of it hasn't changed. Initially I didn't see that, really, as a part of my job, but in the last year I have spent almost as much time -- well, maybe not as much time -- hunting for office space in downtown Meridian to put these people, knowing that they were going to -- they were going to be coming out and so I don't have the -- you know, if somebody would build -- would build a building -- in fact, that we -- part of the conversation I had earlier today that I'm going to look to Caleb -- is that -- that was a -- a local developer coming into my office and having just general conversation, up comes the office space question and the conversation immediately goes -- well, maybe I should turn that residential into office. You know. That's not work that I signed up to do necessarily as a part of this. My job was to start and grow companies. So, if I got to do that to keep them downtown Meridian, I guess I will go do that. But that's -- but that's really the issue. So, from the -- you know, how do you -- how do you say success at this? Twelve companies with 29 employees that are here in Meridian, you know, keeping them in the Meridian vicinity is the best I can do until I can figure out how to solve what's going on downtown. Palmer: Thanks. Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: And I guess it's not just the 29 employees, it's also the 243 events that are going on -- Ritter: Exactly. De Weerd: -- and drawing people downtown, too. Mr. Bernt. Bernt: Madam Mayor. Mr. Ritter. So, just -- just for my personal knowledge, do you have a contract? Ritter: With the city? Bernt: Yes. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 24 of 39 Ritter: Yes. Bernt: What -- Ritter: Base -- Bernt: Base? Okay. What is that? I'm not sure what -- Ritter: It's a -- well, let's see. We just converted it and it has no expiration, except that it has a 90 day out clause for each of the parties. So, I'm living 90 days -- I'm living three months at a time. Bernt: Got it. That's all I need. Thank you. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor. Rick. I know that this isn't something that you had planned to report on, but I think one of the benefits is what you offer to other downtown businesses, where you have consulted and helped with them and I know that that's, basically, proximity, but the one that -- and I can't think of their name, but One Fast Focus I know comes to mind. They have had -- you know, used your office space, as well as co-working and things like that. Are there any other businesses that come to mind or can the whole kind of synergy that you provide downtown, can you give us a 30 second download on it? Ritter: Well, I think the big piece -- and I don't track the daily and weekly in the open space, but most days of the week there are somewhere between one and six people in that space and most of those folks are running businesses from home, primarily in Meridian, although it's kind of interesting, one of the new -- one of the newest monthly members is -- comes to me from Trailhead in downtown Boise, which I thought was kind of an interesting poke in the eye and -- and -- and that's the business that's been forced to develop, mostly because people don't understand what co-working space is. You know, I have actually put -- changed the sign out in front of the building, so people get a sense of flexible workspace and you would be surprised how many times people come in and say I had no idea that I could come here and work for four hours in an afternoon, instead of going to the coffee shop or going to the library or going someplace else. So, that business will continue to grow over time, as we -- you know, as more people become aware of us. You would think after three years there would be more awareness, but there isn't. And I -- quite frankly, this is not the first time I have run into this problem with awareness and we are being newly discovered almost weekly. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: And the benefit, too, of having Unbound just -- Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 25 of 39 Ritter: Right. De Weerd: -- across the parking lot, has been also -- Ritter: I get a lot of business from Nick's place. De Weerd: Yeah. Ms. Milam. Milam: Rick, you know, when you first started this, you know, of course the concept is great, but you know, I struggle to wonder how successful you would be. You know, you have been there three years now and based on things that I have heard, that your numbers -- the amount of utilization you're getting, I consider you a huge asset to this community and I appreciate what you're doing. I'm looking at your numbers as a business person, I wouldn't do it. So, if anyone of you want to give him -- Rick a hard time, there is not a whole lot of profit in this. You're doing this because you love what you do and you really truly care about the businesses and what you're doing for the community, so thanks a lot. Ritter: Yes. Thank you. Other questions? Am I dismissed now? De Weerd: You are officially dismissed. Ritter: Thank you. B. Presentation of Bid Results and Award of AIA 132 Agreements to the prime contractors for the “South Meridian Regional Park” to multiple contractors per the schedule below for a Not- To-Exceed total amount of $3,857,861.72. These awards are the result of the Formal IFB issued November 17, 2017 and opened December 19th. Thirty bids were received for the fourteen different bid packages . BP1 – Knife River Corporation $1,587,382.72 BP2 – Franz Witte Landscape Contracting $ 710,327.00 BP3 – Anvil Fence Company $ 149,500.00 BP4 – Landon Enterprises, LLC $ 563,910.00 BP5 – Walker Fox Brick & Block, Inc. $ 72,250.00 BP6 – Outland Steel, Inc. $ 39,670.00 BP7 – Leighton Enterprises, Inc. $ 37,190.00 BP8 – Signature Roofing $ 66,312.00 BP9 – D&A Door & Specialties, Inc. $ 36,720.00 BP12 – SBI Contracting, Inc. $ 13,730.00 BP13 – LuckyDog Recreation $ 59,750.00 BP14 – DeBest Plumbing, Inc. $ 108,950.00 BP15 – TVR, Inc. $ 26,300.00 Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 26 of 39 BP16 – Power Plus, Inc. $ 385,870.00 De Weerd: Thank you, Rick. On a very positive note. Okay. Item 7-B is a presentation of bid results on our south Meridian park and I will turn this to Mike. Barton: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of Council. I am here this afternoon to ask for your -- your contract award to begin phase one of the new park in south Meridian. We are -- we are really excited and -- but before I do, I have a short presentation just to kind of give you some background information on some of the process and the bidding process and where we -- where we went in design and some of the decisions we made along the way to get us to where we are now. If you remember I was in front of you in November and kind of discussed some of the budget items that, you know, our budget and anticipation of bidding that we thought we were going to have and where we started at 13 million and came down from there. So, some of what I want to talk about this afternoon is -- is that process and the project schedule, as well as those cost reduction items that I talked about. Some of the things that are being put into a future phase and some that are in this phase. Also our bid strategy. The bid results, of course. We have an overall post bid project budget to share now that we have firm numbers and, then, there is also a softball field lighting discussion that I wanted to talk to you about. Should we go to LED lights or stick with Metal Halide and, then, there is some future contract items that you need to be aware of that I want to share and, then, ask for a contract award. So, just kind of diving in and, really, I mean I'm here to have a conversation and a discussion and just stop me at any time if you have questions. Please, feel free to jump right in, as opposed to waiting until the end. So, as you can see from this -- the process was really started with our park system master plan in 2015 and that's where we did our public surveys, our stakeholder interviews. We had that robust process of -- you know, we identified what are our future needs with park services and what do our citizens want to see in a park. We also targeted three specific sites for future parks and we did concept plans at that time. We did a concept plan for the Margaret Aldape property in north Meridian that's going to be on the river. Also the Borup-Bottles property on Cherry Lane and, then, this piece on Lake Hazel was part of that concept planning. So, during that process we had those surveys and stakeholder meetings. We had, you know, brought it to the Commission, brought it to the Council. We had public open houses. So, from that we developed a concept design and, then, really, that's what -- that's what drove that. So, in 2016 we started really getting into the nuts and bolts of design. We took that -- that -- you know, really that site -- how that site was developed as the -- the next regional park is the citizens in south Meridian -- frankly, they feel underserved. They may not be per acres per thousand, but they don't have a regional park in south Meridian. They don't have a Settler's Park or a Kleiner Park and that's really what the -- were the demand and where a lot of the growth is going. So, that's why that site was chosen. So, as we started through that design process in 2016, we worked into the schematic design. We took that original concept that had softball fields and, you know, destination playground and it had a pond and it had all this stuff -- and the picture looked really great and we had a lot of cool things in there that are really expensive, so we took that -- we refined it into more of a schematic design that was a little bit more realistic, that could match the anticipated budget Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 27 of 39 amount that we saw, so as we started working through that process, obviously, we were -- we were gathering numbers and coming back and making design refinements and all along the way we included both the Parks Commission and had the neighborhood meetings. Through that process we had two neighborhood meetings. We presented to the Commission four different times and Council three times. So, where we are today is we have a -- obviously, a completed set of plans in October that we put out to bid and that brings us to our bidding and award. But kind of in between times we -- just so the Council is aware, we are working on a name for the park and we have been discussing that at the commission level right now. There is -- we brought three different names, we whittled it down to two and we are -- we are going back next month to talk about it again, along with some graphics. So, we will be bringing that forward to the Council here in the next few months and if anybody's curious -- I can see -- so, of the three different names that were -- that were out there that kind of made the cut were Inspiration Park, Highland Park, because it sits on the ridge, and, then, also Exploration Park. And Exploration Park right now is the one that's kind of gaining momentum. Because of the discovery theme and the learning landscape component of this park, that exploration where kids can go and explore different items that will come as time goes on and the park develops those educational items. So, we are getting there. We wanted to -- like I said, get it kind of vetted at the commission level, get some graphics maybe to go along with it and, then, bring it forward to the Council. The other two items are just kind of a timeline of construction if the contracts are awarded. We are ready to break ground in a few weeks and we think we can be substantially complete by the end of this year and summer '19 have the park opening once the grass has established enough to allow people to get on it. So, like I mentioned, some of the cost reduction things that we went through -- and a lot of this stuff was done during schematic design before the budget process. The blue -- the blue graphs kind of show the schematic design estimates and where we were in the beginning with that. We took that program that had five softball fields, 50 acres. It had a pond. It had all these things. And we quickly realized that it's not affordable. That a lot of these items, although they are not out of the design, they will come in future phases. The first phase is the backbone of the park. It's the infrastructure. It's the road improvements. It's all -- it's all those items. So, some of things that were taken out or taken out of this phase and we think they are going in in future phases -- possibility of a pond. A deck overlook. A couple of picnic shelters. Two or three more softball fields. An off-leash area for dog owners to run their dog. A mini -- kind of a pocket dog park. Asphalt trails. The maintenance shop is not in this phase. That would be in a future phase. Right now we are going to -- we plan on servicing the park, just a traveling crew would leave our maintenance facility on Lanark and travel and maintain. We might have a little gravel courtyard or something to store some stuff, but no shop. We eliminated a restroom. The other thing we did that was a huge part of this is we took and we looked at the items that we absolutely had to have and we did that value engineering to bring those costs down. Bringing those costs down go with some of the decisions we made during design and it also goes in with some of the bid strategy and that's what I want to talk about next. So, that bid strategy that allowed us to get to where we are today, is bid -- bid the project in the winter when people -- during the off season where they have time to look at it, they are trying to put things on their schedule for the next season. We sent the bids to 133 contractors, Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 28 of 39 specifically mailed bids to them. There is -- 16 different bid packages were issued. We got responses on 14 bid packages from -- 14 bid packages, with a total of 30 bids. There were two bid packages that we didn't get any bids. They were relatively small. It's painting and drywall. So, the big ones we had a good response. The biggest bid package is the site work and we received four bids on that one. So, you can see from that strategy these are the bids that came in. These are the -- these are contracts that we are asking for award today. But the thing that I want to point out is because of that -- that strategy in winter bidding and -- and getting it out into advertising the bids properly, there was a difference just on this amount. There was a difference of 1.1 million dollars between the high bids and the low bids. So, some of the bids -- like the site work, Knife River, who is a well-known contractor, they do big road projects and they were -- they were 350,000 dollars less than the second bidder, so -- I mean some of this is just -- we were -- we were a little bit apprehensive, because of all the -- the talk that you heard about construction costs are up and people are busy and we are not getting bids and this is -- you know, it's almost felt like a gift. So, our overall post-bid project budget, we have a total budget of 6.75 million dollars and if we go down the list of what's still to come, construction cost estimate included --and you see the construction cost estimate is slightly higher than the bid awards and that's because we need to pay for the two bid packages that we didn't get results on, which are painting and drywall, and we -- we have roughly a 100,000 dollar allowance in there to negotiate with. Because we didn't get the bids we can negotiate with whoever we want at this point to get good pricing. So, the other items that are noteworthy are the -- the destination playground, sand and water play, and the splash pad. We put out an RFP a year and a half ago to work with a -- we interviewed and went through a lengthy process to determine which recreational playground supplier we want to work with and have install this and we have a winning bidder, but we don't have an exact design and we have a good idea, but we don't have an exact design and number at this point, so we are just kind of working through that process, too. We will go back to the commission with the design, we will go back to Council with a design, show them this is what we intend to do. We can include you every step of the way. We can include you in the end. I mean you let us -- let us know what your desire is and we are happy to, you know, part way through, hey, this is in what -- kind of what we are thinking. So, we have that yet to come. We have an allowance for signage. Some artwork. Environmental interpretation. Some of those learning landscape components that will go into this. There is also probably more than likely an ACHD road trust amount that we will be liable for and, then, general conditions, construction contingency and, then, construction management fee. Right now we are -- if you add that up we are 169,000 dollars over budget. We think the contingency and the general conditions will -- is -- are well funded. They are funded enough to -- there will be enough savings there to make up that 169,000 dollars. So, when I was in front of you in November I talked about the possibility of a potential budget amendment. Right now we don't need one. So, we can move forward with construction. No budget amendment. We can save that -- you know, we will make up that 169,000 dollars with savings in general conditions, just the time of year. If we move through the summer there won't be any winter -- winter conditions that we need to pay for, blankets and heating and that kind of stuff. So, we think we will easily make that up. So, there is one thing that needs some discussion. The two softball fields are lit. We bid -- the lights Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 29 of 39 were an add alternate. The bids that are in the contract award right now are for Metal Halide lights. They are not for LED lights. The LED lights would be a 225,000 dollar up charge over the Metal Halide. Some of the pros, obviously, are lower energy. They are less glare. They have longer lasting bulbs. You know, how much less energy it's kind of a -- it's kind of an unknown. We contacted Idaho Power to possibly convert the lights at Storey Park to LED, because Idaho Power offers rebates. They told us they wouldn't offer any rebates, because they don't run long enough to see a substantial -- enough savings for them to pay for LEDs. So, obviously, the cons -- or the cost -- just the up- front cost of the LED lights -- but we wanted to -- we want to at least bring that forward, so, you know, if there is discussion later, hey, why didn't -- you know, LEDs are the greatest thing ever and why -- you know, what -- you know, we would love to have them, but they are money, so I guess I'm going to pause right there for discussion. If we -- if the Council directs us to approve the contract with the LEDs, we can come back with a budget amendment out of impact fees for 225,000 dollars and I will pause right there. Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Bernt: Question. So, what is -- what do the ball players think about the LED lights versus normal lights? Do they care? Barton: I -- Bernt: Any word on the street? Barton: I don't have that information. I know the LED lights have a -- they have a mid range mounted -- I mean one of the -- so, some of -- some of -- I mean the real benefit is -- they are less glare. Bernt: Right. Barton: In LED light they have different shrouds on them, so the light almost -- it drops a little closer to the -- Bernt: But doesn't it take longer for it to like get to full capacity with LED light? Barton: Is there is a little warm up time. Yeah. It does have a mid -- mid mounted light there, which helps with some of the balls at lower -- ground balls. I mean we heard the presentation and, you know, some of it is like -- you can -- I get they are going to tell you what sounds cool, but -- Bernt: It seems like -- you know, is it a big deal? We could spend that 225,000 dollars on some shelter. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 30 of 39 Barton: On some shelter? De Weerd: That was a leading question. Barton: The overall cost of the project -- so, here is -- here is the other thing to consider. If we do this on this field, we want to do it on the other field. So, it's not 225,000, it's 500. Or if we have five fields at 750. So, see how it -- I mean it just kind of keeps going. I mean if we -- but we wanted to at least bring it up, because if someone says, you know, LED lights are the greatest thing ever and they save so much energy, why didn't you do that. Well, I will leave it there. Bernt: Thank you. De Weerd: Other questions? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Mike, what's the cost for the lights as in the bid? The Halogen lights -- I guess the lights as presented, what is the cost? Barton: So, the Metal Halide lights were 195,890. And then -- and, then, we also add construction management to that. So, they are about 200. Cavener: Thanks. Barton: You're welcome. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Are we just talking about the lights right now? Barton: Just -- Milam: You only want questions on lights? Or comments? I don't think we need to double the cost of our lights. That's my opinion. If Idaho Power doesn't think it's worth it, then, I don't think it's worth it, too. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 31 of 39 Palmer: I think I missed a figure. What -- what do building the lights as planned -- total costs for all the lights? Barton: Great question. So, the light poles, the bases and -- the installation of the poles and bases is 200,000 dollars. Palmer: Total for all the fields you -- Barton: Not total, because there is -- because -- Bernt: There is only one. Barton: -- part of it -- part of the electrical bid had conduits in it. So, if we couldn't afford the add alternate, we could at least get the conduits in the ground. So, that's not fully loaded. So, I don't have that exact number, but the light -- the amount that's in the electrical contract right now is 200,000 for the ball field. Palmer: Madam Mayor? Madam Mayor, I guess the reason I'm asking is because I still don't want to do any baseball fields or like them. I just want to put grass, put something cooler later when we can afford it. But when we do a baseball field, that's what it's going to be and that's not going to change. And I understand that it's our most popular sport, that everyone and their dog wants it -- especially the dogs, because it's a great enclosed space to let your dog run off leash. That's about the only time I'm out there. I guess -- I don't know. I'm sure baseball games happen, but not when I have been at a park, it's just been an off leash area, but -- I understand that all took place before I was elected and I try to keep in mind -- ask some questions, because there is things that have happened since you got here that are a long time before they will actually take place, but the longer it goes between now and when the construction happens, the more solidified everyone is and that's what's going to happen. So, I just want them gone, but -- just throwing that out there. De Weerd: Any other comments or questions? It sounds like the direction thus far is to stay with the bid that we currently have as related to the lighted fields. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I would agree. The math can be done to determine the -- recapture of the additional cost. And if it's not 10,000 dollars a year of savings, which I doubt it would be, regardless of whether Idaho Power would reimburse you, even with our limited use, you could -- you could come up with a pretty good guestimate on the annual savings, I imagine it's much less than 10,000 year. Barton: It probably is. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 32 of 39 Borton: So, you're well over 30 plus years to recapture the cost, so -- Barton: Yeah. Borton: -- it doesn't make sense. Barton: That's -- fair enough. That's -- yeah. De Weerd: Thank you for the update. We do have a bid in front of Council. Keith is also here if you have any questions regarding process or -- but thank you for this thorough update. We appreciate that. And we are very excited to hear about your bid returns. Barton: Yeah. Just -- just to kind of bring up a couple -- just one more thing is that some of the future contracts that we will be bringing forward are for the drywall and the painting, which is acoustical assemblies -- or the drywall and acoustical assemblies and painting, the playground splash pad, sand and water play, some of the artwork, the road trust and, then, a purchase order for construction management and general conditions and, like I said earlier, those are all accounted for in the -- in the budget right now -- in the post-bid budget. So, I guess with that I'm asking for your approval on our prime contracts. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I have a couple questions first. Mike, so you're -- currently with the bids that you received, 169,000 dollars overbudget, but you have cut out a couple shelters, a bathroom, a tot lot, and some other things. Barton: Correct. Milam: And you have bids that came in 1.1 million dollars less than the lowest came back. So, where is the discrepancy? Barton: So -- Milam: From the original budget -- Barton: Yeah. No -- but from the -- from the schematic design we -- we -- and through the schematic design and design development prior to the budget hearings we got updated costs -- like an opinion of cost from both our consultant and the construction manager. We kind of matched those two together and we said we are over budget. We need to start scaling back and one of the reasons that we -- you know, we -- when we first went into design we had those -- this program that was fully loaded with five fields and -- and all these different amenities and we had to -- through the help of the Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 33 of 39 commission start to scale back and one of the expenses of doing this park right now is the -- this the backbone for future phases. So, there are -- there are costs in phase one that won't be realized in phase two. I think it's important to note, too, that I was kind of looking back at our most recent park construction and this park is -- right now is -- with the project budget at 259,000 dollars per acre. The last three -- well, the two that we did and the third one that's going to open early -- early summer or late spring, at Reta Huskey Park it was 288,000 dollars an acre, 267,000 dollars an acre at Keith Bird Park and, then, 220,000 an acre for Hillsdale. So, this 259,000 dollars an acre is right in line with that and the thing that -- that those parks -- we didn't have to build -- we didn't -- it was a -- the lot was already there for us. I mean it had power. It had sewer. It had water there. All the utilities were brought in. We need to bring utilities down here and do that. So, I'm -- I'm excited for the bids and -- and the process that we went through to control our costs and to get this thing down and -- and be comparable. If not a little bit less. Really it doesn't show up on paper, but it is a little bit less than our most current park construction projects. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Milam: Mike, I hear you and I agree, you know, the larger the acreage the less it's going to be, because a lot less if it has stuff on it; right? You got a lot more open space, which, you know, makes it less per acre and I know that is probably frustrating every time you come before us we want to change a park around, but -- the schematic -- so, the schematic is so off because of inflation or that doesn't take that in -- just why -- I'm going back to the discrepancy between the schematic and where we are today and why we are cutting shelters out, because that's one of the most important parts of a park I think. Barton: Madam Mayor -- that's -- that's a great question and -- so, there is a shelter in -- in this phase. It's funded. It's a 30 by 40. It's the biggest shelter. So, the other two -- there was a 20 by 20 and, then, I believe a 20 by 30 and we want nothing more than to add those amenities. In fact, in our -- in our CIP we will have a budget request for next -- next fiscal year two -- the first thing we want to do is add shelters, because if we put a destination playground in and sand and water and all those cool things, people want to have picnics. I mean it really is one of our most popular things and that's the first thing -- at least my opinion that's the first thing on the list. In fact, if there is savings in some of this contingency over and above the 169,000 dollars, I would -- I would go out and get a change order for a picnic shelter. I mean I think it would be awesome. We just -- some of these things are a casualty of high prices and -- and we want nothing more than to provide all the amenities that people want and we know picnic shelters are one of those -- the most popular items. De Weerd: Any other questions? Okay. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 34 of 39 De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: If we have covered our discussion, I would like the honor of making the motion that we approve the bid results and go ahead and award for the south Meridian park, not to exceed $3,857,861.72. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? You need to have the motion state the individual bids separate. Watts: That is the way we have done the bids, yes, ma'am. Little Roberts: If I may amend it -- the motion -- so, you need them each listed as -- like BP1, Knife River Corporation and the amounts? Watts: Yes, please. Little Roberts: $1,587,382.72. BP2 – Franz Witte Landscape Contracting, $710,327.00. BP3 – Anvil Fence Company, $149,500.00. BP4 – Landon Enterprises, LLC, $563,910.00. BP5 – Walker Fox Brick & Block, $72,250.00. BP6 – Outland Steel, Inc., $39,670.00. BP7 – Leighton Enterprises, $37,190.00. BP8 – Signature Roofing $66,312.00. BP9 – D&A Door & Specialties, Inc., $36,720.00. BP12 – SBI Contracting, Inc., $13,730.00. BP13 – Lucky Dog Recreation, $59,750.00. BP14 – DeBest Plumbing, Inc., $108,950.00. BP15 – TVR, Inc., $26,300.00. BP16 – Power Plus, Inc. $385,870.00. De Weerd: Thank you. Does the second agree with the change? Milam: Second agrees. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Any discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Barton: Thank you. C. City Council Department Liaison and Commission Appointments Resolution No. 18-2056: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 35 of 39 Approving City Council President’s Appointments Of City Council Members To Serve As Department Liaisons, Committee Members, Commission Ex-Officio Members, And City Area Contacts, And Providing An Effective Date. De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Item 7-C is appointments for liaisons and the commissions and I will turn this over to Mr. Borton. Borton: Thank you, Madam Mayor. We have I believe back in October jostled the committee assignments and city area designations a bit and with the addition of Mr. Bernt on the City Council, he is assigned to and will be taking over those responsibilities from Councilman Bird, serving as the ex-officio on the parks and rec commission, as well as serving as the Council representative on the golf course committee, which Councilman Bird had -- had done as well and he will also be taking over city area designation of one, which I believe also was Mr. Bird's. Everyone else's positions that had begun in October would remain the same. So, this resolution is to memorialize the appointment of each of us to our assorted commissions and committees and our city area designations. Everyone else is staying as is as they began in October. De Weerd: And, Council, you will note that the addition was the internal committees as we wanted to have those noted for the record. So, those aren't -- those are internal to the city. Borton: Correct. De Weerd: Okay. Any questions? Okay. Resolution 18-2056 needs a motion to approve. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I move that we approve the resolution 18-2056 appointing the liaison and commission appointments. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Palmer. Palmer: I don't know if anyone else has an opinion, but I -- in my super long history of having experience with transitions of liaison assignments, liked it better when it was at the -- the change of the year. I understand the idea and the value of starting at the Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 36 of 39 beginning of a fiscal year, but I think it makes it awkward, should we ever get to a position where we have a new councilman coming on board, where a certain assignment, whoever was in that seat prior to, might not be the best or most appropriate to just pass on to whoever the new guy is, which would, then, make it extra weird to shift other things around three months into liaison assignments. So, it would be my preference to go back to doing these changes in January, instead of this October. But, again, I don't know if anyone else has an opinion or if they like it. Cavener: Madam Mayor? I will just share my -- since we are -- I guess we are talking -- waxing poetic philosophically about liaison roles, I appreciate the liaison roles following the fiscal year. I know, as someone who been involved with the department and maybe not having as much time to get involved in having a strong understanding of the department needs, getting those extra three months for me is critical. I think that these aren't set in stone and every calendar year after an election the president and the vice- president have the opportunity to work with the Mayor and the other Council Members, the department directors, determine what's best for each department and those changes could happen on the calendar or they could happen more frequently, depending on the needs of the Council Members and their department directors. So, I support leaving it as is, but I'm open to further critiques and criticisms and questions as the years go on, if anyone has any other thoughts to share. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I agree with Councilman Cavener. It's been, I believe, a benefit for me to get in and learning more about the police and their future budget needs and I think those three months have been very helpful when we are already headed quickly toward the budget session. De Weerd: Okay. We do need a vote. Do we have a motion? Cavener: And a second. De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Clerk. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 37 of 39 Borton: To follow up on -- on the assignments, one of the things that -- that I'd like us to do, perhaps starting in the February workshop, these committees have some pretty important activities within them at times and for each workshop to have us have an opportunity to share a little update from the commission, some of them -- you know, SWAC, for example, has got some -- some big activities and the recycle issues we have addressed, that -- if there is opportunities to bring issues to us, just to be aware of, that we will use the workshop as a chance to share briefly what's going on within the commission itself. Not a report with regards to our role as a liaison with our city departments, but with our external committees, so I think we will try that with the February workshop and just give us a chance to keep us all informed. De Weerd: Thank you. I know that when we talked about that it would be important to -- if there is anything of note on your liaison appointments, but certainly those regional committees, it helps to have all informed as to what's going on. Just to -- we didn't have a chance to talk, Mr. Borton, but on the list -- I was just at Garden City's swearing in of their -- their Council and their committee assignments and the Mayor noted on their list what he serves on as well. So, I might add that next time -- next fall when we bring that. So, as we do our monthly updates you have something to track it. Okay. Item 8: Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 18-1760: An Ordinance To Amend The Municipal Code Of The City Of Meridian, County Of Ada, State Of Idaho, Amending Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12(E)(2), Meridian City Code, Known As The Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance Fee Schedule; To Provide For An Amendment To The Police, Fire, And Parks And Recreation Impact Fee Schedules; And Providing An Effective Date. De Weerd: Item 8-A is Ordinance 18-1760. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, read this by title. Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 18-1760: An Ordinance to amend the Municipal Code of the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State Of Idaho, amending Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12(E)(2), Meridian City Code, known as the Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance Fee Schedule; to provide for an amendment to the Police, Fire, and Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Schedules; and providing an effective date. De Weerd: You have heard this read by title. I don't think anyone wants to hear it read in its entirety, unless you do, Ralph. Okay. Do I have a motion? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 38 of 39 Cavener: Don't we bring this back another week. I don't think that we are doing any motion -- De Weerd: Oh, yes, that -- thank you for that. This is the second reading of the ordinance and Ralph doesn't want to hear it read in its entirety and so I don't need a motion to continue this. This will be the second reading. Third reading we will have the public hearing next week. Item 9: Future Meeting Topics De Weerd: Anything under Item 9? Item 10: Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(f): To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated and 74-206(1)(j): To consider labor contract matters authorized under section 67-2345A [74-206A](1)(a) and (b), Idaho Code. De Weerd: Okay. No. 10 is Executive Session. Do I have a motion? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I move that we move into Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74- 2061(f), as well as (1)(j), (1)(a) and (1)(b). Borton: Second. De Weerd: Did you leave any alphabet numbers out of there? Cavener: I don't believe so. De Weerd: I think we got all of them covered. I have a motion and a second. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Bernt, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. (Executive Session: 4:59 p.m. to p.m.) De Weerd: I would entertain a motion to come out of Executive Session. Meridian City Council Workshop January 9, 2018 Page 39 of 39 Milam: So moved. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Do I have a motion to adjourn? Milam: So moved. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR T ATTEST: C. JA COLE DE WEERD ITY CLERK - /Z /� / Q// DATE APPROVED 5V, NX, 3 _�i City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 4A Project/File Number: Item Title: Approve Minutes of January 2, 2018 City Council Regular Meeting Meeting Notes Meridian City Council January 2, 2018 Page 23 of 23 De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Bert: I move to adjourn the meeting this evening. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:01 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYO T MY DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTEST:- o /J C. J Y CO S, C CLERK 1) �7iv of o w m E IDjANJ 0e2. '3CAL-- d City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 413 Project/File Number: Meridian and Boys & Girls Club Item Title: Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and Boys & Girls Club of Ada County for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $10,000 Meetina Notes Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 29 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 30 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 31 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 32 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 33 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 34 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 35 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 36 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 37 of 475 L. No contractual impediments. Subrecipient certifies and agrees that no contractual or other disability exists which would prevent compliance with these requirements. M. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect. N. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written; whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. O. Non -waiver. Failure of either party to promptly enforce the strict performance of any term of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any party's right to thereafter enforce such teen, and any right or remedy hereunder may be asserted at any time after the governing body of either party becomes entitled to the benefit thereof, notwithstanding delay in enforcement. P. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and Subrecipient. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. SUBRECIPIENT: Boys and Girls Clubs of Ada County Colleen Braga, Executive Dir -tor CITY: City of Meridian O�PpRATED,gGC Attest: (iwOf'o By: Tamin e Weerd May jDl W C y F.- ,o; qk* y Cole ity Clerk NO PY17 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT— Boys AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY PAGE 10 OF 10 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 4C Project/File Number: JesseTree of Idaho Item Title: Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and Jesse Tree of Idaho, Inc. for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $2,250 Meetina Notes SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND JESSE TREE OF IDAHO, INC. FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS This Agreement is entered into this l day of , 20 / � by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("City") and Jesse Tree of Idaho, Inc., a non-profit charitable organization established under the laws of the state of Idaho ("Subrecipient"). WHEREAS, City is an entitlement community, and as such has applied for, and been granted authority to receive, funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, Public Law 93-383, i.e., Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") funds; and WHEREAS, Subrecipient provides assistance for extremely low- to low-income persons who are at risk of becoming homeless by providing one-time rental assistance and case management through its Emergency Rent and Mercy Assistance program, which activities complement the objectives of the CDBG program; and WHEREAS, City and Subrecipient wish to enter into a cooperative agreement for the investment of CDBG funds from Program Year 2017 ("PY17"); and WHEREAS, Appendix 11 to 2 Code of Federal Regulations ("CFR") Part 200 establishes required "contract provisions for non-federal entity contracts under Federal awards"; and WHEREAS, it is acknowledged by the Parties that although Congress has signed an appropriation bill committing the funds set forth in this Agreement, and HUD has notified City of its apportionment and approved the City's Action Plan, availability of CDBG funds to City, and thus to Subrecipient, is subject to Congressional release of such funds to HUD and HUD's release of such funds to City; and that City's obligation to provide funding to Subrecipient under this Agreement is provisional, pending the availability of such funds; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, the Parties agree as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICE -Activities. Subrecipient shall use City's PY17 CDBG funds in an amount not to exceed two thousand two hundred and fifty dollars ($2,250) to provide emergency rental payment assistance to low/moderate income ("LMI") persons in order to assist in preventing evictions and homelessness. B. National Objective. Subrecipient certifies that the activities carried out using the City's PY17 CDBG funds provided by City under this Agreement will meet one or more of the CDBG program's National Objectives as defined in 24 CFR § 570.208. Specifically, Subrecipient's activities under this agreement shall benefit LMI persons (24 CFR § 570.208(a)(2)(i)(C)). , Level of Service. Subrecipient's activities under this Agreement shall provide a total of at least `ts o Service*er the term of this Agreement. For the purposes of this Agreement, "Units PY17 SUBRECIPTENT AGREEMENT - JESSE TREE OF IDAHO, INC. PAGE 1 OF 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 41 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 42 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 43 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 44 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 45 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 46 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 47 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 48 of 475 M. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect. N. Entire Agreement. This .Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. O. Non -waiver. Failure of either party to promptly enforce the strict performance of any term of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any party's right to thereafter enforce such term, and any right or remedy hereunder may be asserted at any time after the governing body of either party becomes entitled to the benefit thereof, notwithstanding delay in enforcement. P. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and Subrecipient. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. SUBRECIPIENT: Jesse Tree of Idaho, Inc. abriel Iacobc6, Executive Director CITY: City of Meridian Bv: T �PpRATEpgG Attest: GG �q� SL PY17 SUBRECIFIENT AGREETYIENT - JESSE TREE of IDAHO, INC. Clerk PAGE 10 OF 10 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 4D Project/File Number: NeighborWorks Boise Item Title: Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and NeighborWorks Boise for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $30,000 Meetina Notes M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 5 1 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 5 2 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 5 3 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 5 4 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 5 5 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 5 6 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 5 7 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 5 8 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 5 9 o f 4 7 5 will be binding upon all subcontractors. 4. Documentation. Executed copies of all subcontracts shall be forwarded to City along with documentation concerning the selection process. L. No contractual impediments. Subrecipient certifies and agrees that no contractual or other disability exists which would prevent compliance with these requirements. M. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect. N. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. O. Non -waiver. Failure of either party to promptly enforce the strict performance of any term of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any party's right to thereafter enforce such term, and any right or remedy hereunder may be asserted at any time after the governing body of either party becomes entitled to the benefit thereof, notwithstanding delay in enforcement. P. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and Subrecipient. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. SUBRECIPIENT: NeighborWorks Boise -Fw-. w_ Bud Compher, CEO CITY: City of Meridian By: TaTfilJde Weerd, Attest: OR 0,4 Cit ` Of W C. ColeJ&ity Clerk Ej M SE ,1A0 km2, AI. , PY 17 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT— NEIGHBORWORKs BOISE PAGE 10 OF 10 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 4E Project/File Number: Meridian Food Bank Item Title: Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and Meridian Food Bank for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $40,000 Meeting Notes a] SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND MERIDIAN FOOD BANK FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS This Agreement is entered into this q day of a , 2018 by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal p unici al cor oration organized under the law state of Idaho ("City") and Meridian Food Bank, Inc., a non-profit charitable organization established under the laws of the state of Idaho ("Subrecipient"). WHEREAS, City is an entitlement community, and as such has applied for, and been granted authority to receive, funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, Public Law 93-383, i.e., Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") funds; and WHEREAS, Subrecipient assists individuals and families by providing food products and services, which activities complement the objectives of the CDBG program; and WHEREAS, City and Subrecipient wish to enter into a cooperative agreement for the investment of CDBG funds from Program Year 2017 ("PY17" ); and WHEREAS, Appendix II to 2 Code of Federal Regulations ("CFR") Part 200 establishes required "contract provisions for non-federal entity contracts under Federal awards"; and WHEREAS, it is acknowledged by the Parties that although Congress has signed an appropriation bill committing the funds set forth in this Agreement, and HUD has notified City of its apportionment and approved the City's Action Plan, availability of CDBG funds to City, and thus to Subrecipient, is subject to Congressional release of such funds to HUD and HUD's release of such funds to City; and that City's obligation to provide funding to Subrecipient under this Agreement is provisional, pending the availability of such funds; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, the Parties agree as follows; I. SCOPE OF SERVICE A. Activities. Subrecipient shall use City's PY17 CDBG funds in an amount not to exceed forty thousand dollars ($40,000) to purchase food supplies for distribution at the Meridian Food Bank, located at 133 W. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. B. National Objective. Subrecipient certifies that the activities carried out using the City's PY17 CDBG funds provided by City under this Agreement will meet one or more of the CDBG program's National Objectives as defined in 24 CFR § 570.208. Specifically, Subrecipient's activities under this agreement shall provide new public service to limited clientele (24 CFR § 570.208(a)(2)(i) and 570.201(e)). C. Level of Service. Subrecipient's activities under this Agreement shall provide up to 2,000 Units of Service per month, for a total of 2,000-24,000 Units of Service over the term of this Agreement. For the purposes of this Agreement, "Units of Service" shall be defined as low -to - moderate income individuals/families provided with food products or services. PY17 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT -MERIDIAN FOOD BANK PAGE 1 OF 10 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 6 3 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 6 4 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 6 5 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 6 6 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 6 7 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 6 8 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 6 9 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 7 0 o f 4 7 5 N. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. O. Non -waiver. Failure of either party to promptly enforce the strict performance of any term of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any party's right to thereafter enforce such term, and any right or remedy hereunder may be asserted at any time after the governing body of either party becomes entitled to the benefit thereof, notwithstanding delay in enforcement. P. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and Subrecipient. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. SUBRECIPIENT: Meridian Food Bank, Inc. Dan Clark, Executive Director CITY: City of Meridian By: Tammy dQWeerd, Mayor Attest: ;;RATEDgtic GS T r+ru��r ay . E jpjAlV�. fDAH0 SEALA. 141 ty Clerk PY17 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT -MERIDIAN FOOD BANK PAGE 10 OF 10 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 4F Project/File Number: Ada County Housing Authority Item Title: Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian and Ada County Housing Authority for PY 2017 Community Development Block Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $55,000 Meetina Notes SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND ADA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS This Agreement is entered into this q day of '�61vL) .r , 2018 by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("City") and Ada County Housing Authority, a public body corporate and politic established under the laws of the state of Idaho ("Subrecipient"). WHEREAS, City is an entitlement community, and as such has applied for, and been granted authority to receive, funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, Public Law 93-383, i.e., Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") funds; and WHEREAS, Subrecipient assists families in obtaining decent, safe, and affordable housing solutions, which activities complement the objectives of the CDBG program; and WHEREAS, City and Subrecipient wish to enter into a cooperative agreement for the investment of CDBG funds from Program Year 2017 ("PY17") and Program Year 2016 ("PY16"); and WHEREAS, Appendix II to 2 Code of Federal Regulations ("CFR") Part 200 establishes required "contract provisions for non-federal entity contracts under Federal awards"; and WHEREAS, as to the PY17 funds, it is acknowledged by the Parties that although Congress has signed an appropriation bill committing the funds set forth in this Agreement, and HUD has notified City of its apportionment and approved the City's Action Plan, availability of CDBG funds to City, and thus to Subrecipient, is subject to Congressional release of such funds to HUD and HUD's release of such funds to City; and that City's obligation to provide funding to Subrecipient under this Agreement is provisional, pending the availability of such funds; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, the Parties agree as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICE A. Activities. Subrecipient shall use City's PY17 CDBG funds in an amount not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) and PY16 CDBG funds in an amount not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000), for a total funded amount not to exceed fifty-five thousand dollars ($55,000), to provide direct homeownership assistance to help low/moderate income ("LMI") person purchase homes. Specifically, Subrecipient shall undertake the following activities: 1. Subsidize mortgage principal amounts; 2. Pay any or all of the reasonable closing costs; and 3. Pay up to 50% of the down payment required by the mortgagee. B. National Objective. Subrecipient certifies that the activities carried out using the City's PY17 and PY16 CDBG funds provided by City under this Agreement will meet one or more of the CDBG program's National Objectives as defined in 24 CFR § 570.208. Specifically, Subrecipient's activities under this agreement shall benefit LMI persons (24 CFR § 570.208 (a)(2)(i)(C))• PY17 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT -ADA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PAGE 1 OF 10 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 7 4 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 7 5 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 7 6 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 7 7 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 7 8 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 7 9 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 8 0 o f 4 7 5 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 8 1 o f 4 7 5 M. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect. N. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. O. Non -waiver. Failure of either party to promptly enforce the strict performance of any term of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any party's right to thereafter enforce such term, and any right or remedy hereunder may be asserted at any time after the governing body of either party becomes entitled to the benefit thereof, notwithstanding delay in enforcement. P. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and Subrecipient. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. SUBRECIPIENT: Ada County Housing Authority a Deanna CITY: City of Meridian Attest: O�eOED AUC By: Taeerd, Mayor 01 or mmy w , ay Co �E IDIAN� -4 IOAHO Vn SEAL ty Clerk PY17 SUBRECIPIENTAGREEMENT—ADA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PAGE 10 OF 10 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 4G Project/File Number: THE EWING COMPANY Item Title: Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement to THE EWING COMPANY for the "WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BUILDING A CRANE" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $64,831.00 Meetina Notes 5 CONTRACT CHECKLIST Date: REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Project Name: Project Manager: Contract Amount: Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Is this a change order? Yes No Change Order No. Fund: Budget Available ( Purchasing attach report ): Department Yes No Construction GL Account FY Budget: Task Order Project Number: Enhancement: Yes No Professional Service Equipment Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No Grant Grant #: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status (Federal Funded) Print and Attach the determination Print, attach and amend bid by addendum (if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach Master Agreement Category (Bid Results Attached) Yes No (Ratings Attached) Yes No Date MSA Roster Approved: Typical Award Yes No If no please state circumstances and conclusion: Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends: PW License Expiration Date: Corporation Status Insurance Certificates Received (Date): Expiration Date: Rating: A+ Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): Rating: A++ Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes No (Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000) Reason Consultant Selected 1 Performance on past projects Check all that apply Quality of work On Budget On Time Accuracy of Construction Est 2 Qualified Personnel 3 Availability of personnel 4 Local of personnel Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation: Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: By: Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final $64,831 Jared hale If yes, has policy been purchased? III. Contract Type II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) 60 3590 94400 10595.B TASK ORDER N/A RFP / RFQ BID VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete) 1/3/2018 Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected VIII. AWARD INFORMATION Approval Date Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved January 3, 2018 I. PROJECT INFORMATION 1/3/2018 4/1/2018 N/A N/A 18 1/3/2018 PUBLIC WORKS WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BUILDING A CRANE V. BASIS OF AWARD 12/22/2017 December 28, 2017 IV. GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded projects VI. CONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Goodstanding PWC-C-12003 7/31/2018 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 84 of 475 Page 1 Memo To: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk, From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager CC: Jared Hale Date: 1/03/2018 Re: JANUARY 9 th City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the January 9 th City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration. Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement to THE EWING COMPANY for the “WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BUILDING A CRANE” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $64,831.00. Recommended Council Action: Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement to The Ewing Company for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $64,831.00. Thank you for your consideration. City of Meridian Purchasing Dept. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 85 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 86 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 87 of 475 CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION WRRF TERTIARY F]LTER BUILDING A CRANE PBOJECT # 10595.B INTRODUCTION Whereas, the City has a need for services involving Crane lnstallation; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to pertorm and has agreed to provide such services; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ol the mutual promises, covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: TERMS AND CONDITIONS '1 .1 CONTRACTOR shall perform and furnish to the City upon execution of this Contract and receipt ol the City's written notice to proceed, all services and work, and comply in all respects, as specified in the document titled "Scope of Work" a copy ol which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, together with any amendments that may be agreed to in writing by the parties. 1.2 All documents, drawings and written work product prepared or produced by the Contractor under this Agreement, including without limitation electronic data Jiles, are the property of the Contractor; provided, however, the City shall have the right to reproduce, publish and use all such work, or any part thereof, in any manner and lor any purposes whatsoever and to authorize others to do so. lf any such work is copyrightable, the Contractor may copyright the same, except that, as to any work which is copyrighted by the contractor, the city reserves a royaltyJree, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use such work, or any part thereol, and to authorize others to do so' 1.3 The contractor shall provide services and work under this Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable Iederal' state and city laws, ordinances, regulations and resolutions. The contractor represents and wariants that it will perform its work in accordance with generally WRRF TEBTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE page 1 of 13 Project 10595.8 THIS CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION is made this 9th day of January, 20.18, and entered into by and between the City ol [\/eridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State ol ldaho, hereinalter referred to as 'CITY', 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642, and The Ewino Company. lnc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR", whose business address is 1500 Eldorado, Ste. 4. Boise. lD 83704 and whose Public Works Contractor License # is PWC-C-12003. 1. Scope of Work: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 88 of 475 accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or professions that are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in elfect at the time of performance of this Agreement. Except for that representation and any representations made or contained in any proposal submitted by the Contractor and any reports or opinions prepared or issued as part of the work performed by the Contractor underthis Agreement, Contractor makes no other warranties, either express or implied, as part of this Agreement. 1 .4 Services and work provided by the Contractor at the City's request under this Agreement will be performed in a timely manner in accordance with a Schedule oI Work, which the parties hereto shall agree to. The Schedule of Work may be revised from time to time upon mutual written consent of the parties. 2. Consideration 2.1 The Contractor shall be compensated on a Not-To-Exceed basis as provided in Exhibit B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof for the Not-To-Exceed amount ol $O4831.00. 2.2 The Contractor shall provide the City with a monthly statement and supporting invoices, as the work warrants, of lees earned and costs incurred lor services provided during the billing period, which the City will pay wilhin 30 days of receipt of a correct invoice and approval by the City. The City will not withhold any Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax from any payment made by City to Contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Payment of all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of Contractor. 2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor shall not be entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration, compensation, salary, wages, or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, transportation, drawings, renderings or mockups. Specifically, Contractor shall not be entitled by virtue ol this Agreement to consideration in the form of overtime, health insurance benelits, retirement benefits, paid holidays or other paid leaves ol absence ol any type or kind whatsoever. 3. Term: 3.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, and shall expire upon (a) completion of the agreed upon work, (b) or unless sooner terminated as provided in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and Section 4 below or unless some other method or time of termination is listed in Exhibit A. 3.2 Should Contractor def ault in the perlormance of this Agreement or materially breach any ol its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to Contractor. WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE Project 10595.8 page2of13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 89 of 475 3.3 Should City fail to pay Contractor all or any part ol the compensation set lorth in Exhibit B ol this Agreement on the date due, Contractor, at the Contractor's option, may terminate this Agreement i{ the lailure is not remedied by the City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due. 4. Liquidated Damages: Substantial Completion shall be accomplished within 90 (ninety) calendar days from Notice to Proceed. This pro.ject shall be considered Substantially Complete when the Owner has lull and unrestricted use and benefit of the facilities, both from an operational and safety standpoint, and only minor incidentalwork, corrections or repairs remain lorthe physical completion of the total contract. Contractorshall be liable to the City lor any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $250.00 (two hundred lifty dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty. Upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall have 120 (one hundred twenty) calendar days to complete the work as described herein. Contractor shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $250.00 (two hundred fifty dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty. See ^/ilestones listed in the Payment Schedule for Substantial Completion. 5. Termination: 5.1 lf , through any cause, CONTRACTOR, its oJficers, employees, or agents lails to lulf ill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to CONTRACTOR of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof al least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination. CONTRACTOR may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least sixty (60) days notice to CITY. ln the event ol any termination of this Agreement, all finished or unlinished documents, data, and reports prepared by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily complete hereunder. 5.2 Notwithstanding the above, CONTRACTOR shall not be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by CONTRACTOR, and the CITY may withhold any payments to WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE page 3 of '13 Project 10595.B Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 90 of 475 CONTRACTOR for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the CITY from CONTRACTOR is determined. This provision shall survive the termination of thrs agreement and shall not relieve CONTRACTOR oI its liability to the CITY for damages. 6. lndependent Contractor: 6.1 ln all matters pertaining to this agreement, CONTRACTOR shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither CONTRACTOR nor any officer, employee or agent of CONTRACTOR will be deemed an employee ol CITY. Except as expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City and therefore has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the City. The selection and designation of the personnel of the CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by the CITY. 6.2 Contractor, its agents, officers, and employees are and at all times during the term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent contractors and not as employees ol the City. 6.3 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's control with respect to the physical action or activities ol Contractor in f ulf illment o1 this Agreement. lf in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction and supervision and control of the Contractor. 7. Sub-Contractors: Contractor shall require that all of its sub-contractors be licensed per State ol ldaho Statute # 54-1901 8. Removal of Unsatisfactory Employees: The Contractor shall only lurnish employees who are competent and skilled for work under this contract. lf, in the opinion of the City, an employee ol the Contractor is incompetent or disorderly, refuses to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract, threatens or uses abusive language while on City property, or is otherwise unsatisfactory, that employee shall be removed lrom all work under this contract. 9. lndemnification and lnsurance: 9.1 CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY and it's elected officials, olficers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and for any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or iniury to persons or property WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE page 4 of t 3 Project 10595.8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 91 of 475 and losses and expenses and other costs including litigation costs and attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the CONTRACTOR, its servants, agents, olficers, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of CITY or its employees CONTRA CTOR shall maintain. and soecificallv aqrees that it will maintain , throuqhout the term ol thrs Affeement, liabilitv tnsu rance in which the CITY shall be named an addit ional insured rn the minimum amounts as follow: General Liabil ity One Ii/illion Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident or occurrence, Automobile Liability lnsurance One Million Dollars (91 ,000,000) per incident or occurrence and Workers' Compensation lnsurance, in the statutory limits as required by law.. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY; and if CITY becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein provided, CONTRACTOR covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of, resulting lrom , or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Contractor or Contractor's olficers, employs, agents, representatives or subcontractors and resulting in or attributable to personal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible or intangible property, including use of. CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY with a Certificate of lnsurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing CONTRACTOR'S compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of insurance with the CITY at least ten (10) days prior to the date Contractor begins perlormance of it's obligations under this Agreement. ln the event the insurance minimums are changed, CONTRACTOR shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits. Evidence of all insurance shall be submitted to the City Purchasing Agent with a copy to lt/eridian City Accounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Ivleridian, ldaho 83642. 9.2 lnsurance is to be placed with an ldaho admitted insurerwith a Best's rating of no less than A-. 9.3 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be declared in writing and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles, self-insured retentions or named insureds; or the Contractor shall provide a bond, cash or letter of credit guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 9.4 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, Contractor's lnsurance coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City's elected officers, oflicials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City or the City's elected oificers, oflicials, employees and volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with Contractor's insurance except as to the extent of City's negligence. WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE Project 10595.8 page 5 ol l3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 92 of 475 9.5 The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 9.6 All insurance coverages lor subcontractors shall be subject to all ol the insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein. 9.7 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability o{ the Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives, employees orsubcontractors. 10. Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a detault under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. 11. Bonds: Payment and Performance Bonds are required on all Public Works lmprovement Projects per the ISPWC and the City ol Meridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC, which by this reference are made a part hereof. Contractor is required to furnish faithful performance and payment bonds in the amount of 100% ol the contract price issued by surety licensed to do business in the State of ldaho with a Best's rating ol no less than A-. ln the event that the contract is subsequently terminated lor lailure to perlorm, the contractor and/or surety will be liable and assessed for any and all costs for the re-procurement o{ the contract services. 12. Warranty: All construction and equipment provided under this agreement shall be warranted for 2 years f rom the date of the City of Meridian acceptance per the ISPWC and the Meridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC and any modifications, which by this reference are made a part hereof. All items found to be defective during a warranty inspection and subsequently corrected will require an additional two (2) year warranty from the date of City's acceptance of the corrected work. 13. Changes: The CITY may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope ol Work to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of CONTRACTOR'S compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and CONTRACTOR, shall be incorporated in written amendments which shall be executed with the same formalities as this Agreement. WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE Project 10595.8 page6of13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 93 of 475 14. Taxes: The City of Meridian is exempt from Federal and State taxes and will execute the required exemption certificates for items purchased and used by the City. ltems purchased by the City and used by a contraclor are subject to Use Tax. All other taxes are the responsibility of the Contractor and are to be included in the Contractor's Bid pricing. 15. Meridian StormwaterSpecifications: All construction projects require either a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or an erosion sediment control plan (ESCP) as specified in the City ol Meridian Conslruction Stormwater lvlanagement Program (CSWMP) manual. The CSWMP manual containing the procedures and guidelines can be found at this address: htto://www.meridiancitv.oro/envi ronmental.aspx?id= 1 361 8. Contractor shall retain all stormwater and erosion control documentation generated on site during construction including the SWPPP manual, field inspections and amendments. Prior to final acceptance of the job by the City the contractor shall return the field SWPPP manual and field inspection documents to the City for review. A completed Contractor Request to File Project N.O.T. with the EPA lorm shall be provided to the City with the documents. These documents shall be retained, reviewed and approved by the City prior to final acceptance ol the project. 16. ACHD: Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with the City to obtain appropriate ACHD permit(s) and will reimburse the City lor fees, lines, or penalties City incurs due to Contractor's violation of any ACHD policy. City shall certify to ACHD that Contractor is authorized to obtain a Temporary Highway and Right-of-Way Use Permit from ACHD on City's behalf. The parties acknowledge and agree that the scope of the agency granted by such certification is limited to, and conterminous with, the term and scope ol this Agreement. 17. Reports and lnformation: 17.1 At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and inlormation as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. 17.2 Contractor shall maintain all writings, documents and records prepared or compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a minimum of four (4) years from the termination or completion of this or Agreement. This includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static, photographic and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols or any combination thereof. page7of13WFIRF TERTIAHY FILTER BLDG A CRANE Project 10595.8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 94 of 475 18. Audits and lnspections: At any time during normal business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY {or examination all of CONTRACTOR'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall permit the CITY to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts lrom such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. 19. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material: No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CITY shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement. 20. Equal Employment Opportunity: ln performing the work herein, Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions o1 Title Vl and Vll of the Civil Rights Act, Revenue Sharing Act Title 31, U.S. Code Section 2176. Specifically, the Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. Contractor will take affirmative action during employment or training to insure that employees are treated without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. ln perlorming the Work required herein, CONTRACTOR shall not unlaMully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 21. Employment of Bona Fide ldaho Residents: Contractor must comply with ldaho State Statute 44-1002 which states that the Contractor employ ninetyJive percent (95%) bona fide ldaho residents. 22. Advice of Attorney: Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement. lt has received independent legal advice f rom its attorney's or the opportunity to seek such advice. 23. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys'fees as determined by a Court ol competent lurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE page I of 13 Projecl 10595.8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 95 of 475 contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture ol this Agreement. 24. ConslructionandSeverability: lf any part of this Agreemenl is held to be invalid or unenlorceable, such holding will not alfect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable ol completion. 25. Waiver of Default: Waiver ol delault by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modilication of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided above. 26. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. 27. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that CONTRACTOR shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. 28. Payment Request: Payment requests shall be submitted to City of Meridian through the City's proiect management software. The Pro.lect Manager will compare the invoice against the Payment Schedule in the Agreement for compliance. Upon approval that the work has been done and is in compliance with the Agreement, the Project Managerwill approve the pay request for processing. City of Meridian payment terms are Net 30 from the date City receives a correct invoice. Final payment will not be released until the City has received a tax release from the Tax Commissron. 29. Cleanup: Contractor shall keep the worksite clean and free from debris. At completion of work and prior to requesting f inal inspection, the Contractor shall remove all traces of waste materials and debris resulting from the work. Final payment will not be made il cleanup has not been performed. WHRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE Project 10595.8 page 9 of '13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 96 of 475 30. Order of Precedence: The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement, the Invitation for Bid document, then the winning bidders submitted bid document. 31. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of work required hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. 32. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. 33. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY CONTRACTOR City of Meridian The Ewing Company, Inc. Purchasing Manager Attn: John Ewing 33 E Broadway Ave 1500 Eldorado, Ste. 4 Meridian, ID 83642 Boise, ID 83704 208-489-0417 Phone: 208-377-1500 Email: bids@ewingcompany.com Idaho Public Works License # PWC -C-12003 Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. 34. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of Meridian. CITY OF MERIDIAN THE EWING COMPANY, INC. BY: V"IVI Al l401uu JOHNA/ EWIN , President Dated: j q1 2o` K Dated: 2 � /Y V V WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE page 10 of 13 Project 10595.13 Approved by Council Attest: C.JAY OLE IT ERK q/�)O19 Purchasing AAI>ProVal BY: KEITHPurch ing Manager , Dated:: ' Z16 Project Manager Jared Hale TED Ci1V u( w E IDIgN�.. \& SEAL Depadt ent Ap r v BY: WARREN STEWA T, City Engineer Dated:: / Z3 Z ► r,� WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE page 11 of 13 Project 10595.13 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK REFER TO INVITATION TO BID PW-l816-10595.8 ALL ADDENDUMS, ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the Invitation to Bid Package # PW-1816-10595.8, are by this reference made a part hereof. SPECIFICATIONS / SCOPE OF WORK All construction work shall be done in accordance with the current version of the ldaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC), the 2013 City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC (and any Addendums). See separate attached documents: Plans - WRRF Tertiary Filter Crane Design by tt/ountain Waterworks dated November 2017 1s pasesl Special Provisions and/or Technical Specifications by lr/ountain Waterworks dated May 2016 1zo pagesl WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE Protect 10595.8 page 12 of 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 99 of 475 A Exhibit B MILESTONE / PAYMENTSCHEDULE Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed $64,381 .00. Milestone 1 Substantial Completion 90 Days lrom Notice to Proceed Milestone 2 Final Completion 1 20 Days f rom Notice to Proceed Contract includes furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals as required for the WRRF Tertiary Filter Building A Crane per IFB PW-1816-10595.8 NOT TO EXCEED CONTRACT TOTAL $6!138L00 Conlract is a not to exceed amounl. Line item pricing below will be used lor invoice verilication and any additional increases or decreases in work requested by city. The City will pay the contractor based on actual quantities of each ilem ol work in accordance with the contract documents. Item No.Description Quantity Unil Unil Price 7 Provide & lnstall Building Crane 1 L5 s64,381.00 WRRF TERTIARY FILTER BLDG A CRANE Project 10595.8 page 13 of 13 MILESTONE DATES/SCHEDULE PRICING SCHEDULE Contract Pricing Schedule Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 100 of 475 E IDIAN BID RESULTS DUE DATE & TIME: December 1 2O'17 2:3OBID NAME: WRRF TE RTIARY FILTER BUILDING A CRANE BID NUMBER: PW-1816'10 595.8 VENDOR ! .9 oop -o BIO AMOUNT t ",\-f [r)^I!.Opened by: Attest: /'-\ -'-')Grn.- Yl*yC 11,scb--[r..1aaOt - /.4, 43 I/1)TE eutnt-IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IDAHO Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 101 of 475 City Of l4eridian Detaifed statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Repolt - Keith 50 - EntrrPliae l.und 3590 - tlw Conatruction Plojectg From 10 / 1/2 017 Through 9/30/2018 94400 10349 10595 0 ,00 99,999 .96 0 .00 (2,958 .',7 5) 0. 00 8,900.00 0. 00 2t958.',75 99 | 999.96 18, 900 . 00 ) 13.133 .52 Capital OutLay Capital - Equipnent WWTP Generator Loaclbanks Tertiary Eilter Buifding Crane Tertiary Eilter Buildj.ng A Crane Carryforwar:d Total Capital Out.Lay Budget with Current Year Actual Budget Remaining Percent of Budget Remaining 0.00* 100.009 0.009 100.009 10595.d Carr. . . 5 941.25 lal 192-23 94.t8* TOTAL EXPENDITURES 113 ?33.48 5,941-25 94.l8 jt Date: 1/3/13 0 5:21:04 PM 113,133.48 10'7 ,192.23 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 102 of 475 ETRAKiT lnspections Elevators E FlEMe gea e FooorP...md Page I of 1 ACTI!'E Tne Ewing Co., lnc. Permits Licenses, Serrch Tmd. Licsnss. Public WOrkS Searoh ir search Asain Dowlroad Resurrs Pnntable view Tne Ewing Co , lnc.1,2,5 First Prev Details - License Number: PWC4-12003 Page: 1 of 1 LastNeft Violations Shopping Cart Contact Tn oiEo. ot Bok no s.tuly, mk !.wry.ionio p.odre.nd puu..h nl. lmr @Gnl.nd .@nr..lomrff posiH. No sm.t .,.pors.d or irlpl6d .G pou&d rorthc dtla h.6m. ir. u$ n it rnl.DoLion ulilirlM ol tl6 sb.iL ind@n. und. rrnding .nd .@p1..6 oi lhi. .l.i.dnt hrp3 / rw.B.ho govhbout,uJpnv.c]-porEy/ 1-10G955-304f, 1090 E Ud.nm. Sl, SuiL l5O M.ndi.n lD 33612 IiOME I CONIACT @ PWC-C-12003 00@1, 00@2, 00003 Fees $4,840.00 Rcgbtralion l: Expiro: Sub-Typ€: st tu!: Cell: tuger: (208) 37G1481 PWC,C.12003 7fi412017 781t2014 PUELIC WORKS UNIIMITED ACTIVE The Ewing Co., lnc. (20E) 377-1s00 BLDI4OMOOO6 BUILDING ACTIVE .:l Pernn(r) https://web.dbs.idaho.gov/etrakit3/Custom/ldaho_publicWorksSearchRslts.aspx U3t20t8 xom I s.tup.nAc.6u rL.r'n @l Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 103 of 475 IDSOS Viewing Business Entity Page I of3 IDAHO SECRETARY OF STATE Viewing Business Entity Lawerence Denney, Secretary of State I New Search ] [ Back to Summarv ] I Get a certificate of existence for EWING CO.. INC. (THE) ] I Monitor EWING CO.. INC. (THE) business filinos ] EWrNG CO., rNC. (THE) 15OO EL DORADO STE 4 BOISE, ID 83704 Type of Business: CORPORATION, GENERAL BUSINESS Status: GOODSTANDING 08 Oct 1982 State of Originr IDAHO Date of 08 Oct 1982 Origination/Authorization : Current Registered Agentr JOHN R EWING 15OO EL DORADO BOISE. ID 83704 Organizational ID / Filing C52205 N umber: Number of Authorized Stock 5000 Shares: Date of Last Annual Report: 26 Oct 2OL7 Annual Report Due: Oct 2018 Original Filing: I Help Me Print/View TIFF ] Filed O8 Oct 1982 INCORPORATION View Imaoe (PDF format) FF Amendments: I Helo Me Print/View TIFF ] View Imaoe (PDF format) View Imaoe (TIFF format) View Imaoe (PDF format) View Imaoe FF format) View Image ( PDF format) View Imaoe FF format) Annual Reports: I Help Me Print/View TIFF ] View Document Online View Do cument Online View Document Online View Document Online View Document Online Amendment Filed 05 Sep t979 Amendment Filed 13 Dec 2012 Amendment Filed 05 Feb 2013 OTHER. R/A ARTICLES RESTATEMENT ARTICLES RESTATEM ENT Report for year 2Ol7 ANNUAL REPORT Report for year 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Report for year 2015 ANNUAL REPORT Report for year 2014 ANNUAL REPORT Report for year 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 11312018hftps://www. accessidaho.org/public/sos/corp/C52206.html Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 104 of 475 Surety 2028 Halls Mill Road, PO Box 1650 Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889-1650 Federal Insurance Company AIA Document A3l2rN- 2OlO Performance Bond Any singular reference to Confi-actor, Suery, Owner or otler party shall be considered plunl where applicable. COMRASIOR SURETY (Name on d Pincipal pldce ofBusiness): (Name,legal status and address): Federal Insurance Company The Ewing Company, lnc. 2O2B Hall,s Mill Road 1500 Eldorado, Suite 4 Whitehouse Station, NJ O8BB9 Boise, lO 83704 OWNER (Name,legal status and aildress): City ol Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, lD 83642 CONSTRUCNON CONTRACT gxlg; January 9, 2018 Amount: $64,831 .00 Sixty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty One Dollars and 00i 100 Description (Nome and l,ocation): WFIFIF Tertiary Filter Building A Crane, 3401 N Ten Mile Bd, Meridian, ldaho - Proiect No. 10595.8 BOND Date(NotearlierthanConstructionContractDate): January 9, 201 8 Amount: $64,831 .00 Sixty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty One Dollars and 00/100 MoCilications to this Bond: f,l None tr See page 4 CONTRACTORS AS PRINCIPAL Company:(Corporate Seal) The EYring Compan Federal Insurance Signature:Signature: Name and Titlezl I /ea7 Attomey-in-Fact Name SURETY Company: Brenda J. Sm (FOR IM'ORMA?ION ONLY - Name, Address and Telephone) AGEMoTBROIGR: Paynewest lnsurance, lnc. 960 Broadway Avenue, Suite 100 Boise, lD 83706 208-424-2900 OWNER'S RPRESENIATM (Atchitect, Enginer or other wO): Printed in qnperotionwith thc Amedcanltustitute oJ Architects (NA) W Chuth- The languoge in thit doctment confontls to the longuoEe uscd in AIADo$mcntAil2 -mlo. Fom l5{2{5,'}Pm Gs. ,Vl6) h\x EHL'EIEI o + 908.903.3485 F + 908.903.3656 Bond No. 82041234 Signed and Sealed this gth dayof January,20'18 (Any ailditional signatures aryear on the last We of this Perfonnance Bond.) IMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 105 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 106 of 475 L The Contractor and the Suety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the Owner for the performance ofthe Construction Contract, which is incorporated herein byreference. 2 lfthe Contractor performs the Constmction Contract, the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond, except when applicable to participate in a conference as provided in Section3. 3. If there is no Owner Default under the Construction Contract, the Surety's obligation under this Bond shall arise after: J the Owner first provides notice to the Contractor and the Surety that the Owner is considering declaring a Contractor Default. Such notice shall indicate rvhether the Owner is requesting a conference among the Owner, Contractor and Surety to discuss the Contractor's performance. If the owner does not request a conference, the Suety may, within flve (5) business days after receipt ofthe Owner's notice, request such a conference. Ifthe Surety timely requests a conference, the Owner shail attend. Unless the Owner agrees otherwise, any conference requested under this Section 3.1shall be held within ten (10)business days ofthe Surety's receipt ofthe Owner's notice. If the Owner, the Contractor and the Surety agxee, the Contractor shall be allowed a reasonable time to perform the Construction Contract, but such an agleement shall not lvaive the Owner's right, if any, subsequently to declare a Contractor Default; 2 the Owner declares a Contractor Default, terminates the Construction Contract and notifies the Suretyi and 3 the Owner has a$eed to pay the Balance of the Contract Price in accordance with the terms of the Construction Contract to the Surety or to a contractor selected to perform the Construction Contract. 4. Failure on the part ofthe Owner to comply with the notice requirement in Section 3.1 shall not constitute a failure to comply with a condition precedent to the Surety's obligations, or release the Surety from its obligations, except to the extent the Surety demonstrates actual prejudice. 5. When the Owner has satisfied the conditions ofSection 3, the Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's expense take one ofthe following actions: 5J Arrange for the Contractor, with consent ofthe Orvner, to perform and complete the Construction Contrac! 52 Undertake to perform and complete the Consauction Contract itself, through its agents or independent contractors; 53 Obtain bids or negotiated proposals from qualified contractors acceptable to the Owner for a contract for performance and completion ofthe Construction Contract, arrange for a contract to be prepared for execution by the Owner and a contractor selected with the Owner's concurrence, to be secured with performance and payment bonds executed by a qualified surety equivalent to the bonds issued on the Construction Contract, and pay to the Owner the amount ofdamages as described in Section 7 in excess ofthe Balance ofthe Contract Price incurred by the Owner as a result ofConEactor Default; or 5.4 Waive its right to perf'orm and complete, arrange for completion, or obtain a new contractor and with reasonable promptness under the circumstances: .1After investigation, determinethe amount forwhich it maybe liable tothe Ownerand, as soon as practicable after tlle amount is determined, make payment to the Owner; or .2 Deny liability in whole or in part and noti$, the Own€r, citing the reasons for denial, 6. Ifthe Surety does notproceed as provided in Section 5lvith reasonable promptness, the Suretyshall be deemed to be in default on this Bond seven days after receipt of an additional written notice from the Owner to the Surety demanding that the Surety perForm its obligations under this Bond, and the Orvner shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner. Ifthe Surety proceeds as provided in Section 5.4, and the Owner refuses the payment or the Surety has denied liability, in whole or in part, without further notice the Ovrrner shail be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner. Printed in cooperotioflwith the Aneri.an lrlstitute ofArchitecls (AIA) W Chubb. The language in this docllment confofins to the language usedin AIA Doeunent Ail2 N - 2O1O. 2Fom ,S2-O571-FED (Rev. u^6)Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 107 of 475 7. Ifthe Surety elects to act under Section 5.1, 5.2 or 5.3, then the responsibilities ofthe Suety to the Owner shall not be greater than those ofthe Contractor under the Construction Contract, and the responsibilities of the Owner to the Surety shall not be greater than those of the Owner under the Construction Contract. Subject to commitrnent by the Ou.ner to pay the Balance of the Contract Price, the Suety Is obligated, without duplication, for I the responsibilities ofthe Contractor for correction ofdefective workandcompletionofthe Constructioncontract; 2 additional legal, design professional and delay costs resulting from the Contractor's Default, and resulting from the actions or failure to act ofthe Surety under Section 5; and 3 liquidated damages, or ifno liquidated damages are specified in the Construction Contract, actual damages caused by delayed performance or non-performance of the Contractor. 8. Ifthe Surety elects to act under Section 5.1, 5.3 or 5.4, the Surety's liability is limited to the amount ofthis Bond. 9. The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner or others for obligations of the Contractor that are unrelated to the Construction Contract, and the Balance ofthe Contract Price shall not be reduced or set offon account ofany such unrelated obligations. No right of action shall accrue on this Bond to any person or entity other than the Owner or its heirs, executors, administrators successors and assigns. 1O. The surety hereby waives notice ofany change, including changes of time, to the Construction Contract or to related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations. lL Any proceeding, legal or equitable, under this Bond may be instituted in any court of competent jurisdiction in the location in which the work or part of the work is located and shall be instituted within two years after a declaration of Contractor Default or within two years after the Contractor ceased working or within two years after the Surety refuses or fails to perform its obligations under this Bond, whichever occurs first. If the provisions of this Paragxaph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties as a defense in thejurisdiction ofthe suit shall be applicable. 12 Notice to t}re Surety, &e Olvner or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the page on which their sig-nature appears. lil. When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location where the construction u/as to be performed, any provision in this Bond conllicting with said statutory or legal requtement shall be deemed deleted herefrom and provisions conforming to such statutory or other legal requirements shall be deemed incorporated herein. When so fumished, the intent is that this Bond shall be construed as a statutory bond and not as a common law bond. 14. DEFINITIONS 14,1 Balance of the Contract Price: The total amount payable by the O*,ner to the Contractor under the Constr:uction Contractafterall properadjustrnents havebeen made, includingallowance tothe Contractorofanyamounts received or to be received bythe Ownerin settlementofirsurance or otherclaims for damages to which the Contractor is entitle4 reduced by all valid and proper payments made to or on behalfofthe Contractor under the Construction Contract. l42construction Contract: The agreement between the Owner and the Contractor identified on the cover page, including all Contract Documents and changes made to the agreement and the Contract Documents. l4.3contractor Defaultr Faiiure of the Contractor, rvhich has not been remedied nor waived, to perform or otherwise to comply with the term of the Consrucdon Contract. t4,40wler Def;ault: Failure of the Owner, which has not beea remedied or waived, to pay the Contractor as required under the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or comply with the other material terms of the CorEtruction Coau?ct. 14.5. Contract Documents: AII the documents that comprise the agreement between the Owner and Conffactor. 15. If this Bond is issued for an agreement between a Contmctor and subcontractor, the term Contractor in this Bond shall be deemed to be Subcontractor and the term Owner shall be deemed to be Contractor. Printed il cooperation $,ith the Americqn lrctitute ofArchitects WA) b! Chubb. The language inthlt document cotfonns to the language used in AIA Doc'unett 4312 nt - 2O1O, 3Form 1tu2-0573-FED (Rev. 11116)Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 108 of 475 16 MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLOWS: (Space is provided below for additionai sippratures ofadded parties, other than those appearing on the cover page.) CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL Company:t*,rparate Seat) SURETY Company: Federal Insurance Company {,Corpor{1te Seal) Signature;_ Name and Titler Address: Name and Title: Address: Printed in coopa'ation with the Afiericafi Institute oJ Architects (AIA) by chubb. The lan*tage in this dodtmefit conlortus to the language Laed in AIA Doanneit A312 N - 2O1O. ,1rotnr t5 02-0573-FED (Aer 11116)Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 109 of 475 EHLJEIEI AIA Document A3l2r'!\r- 2OlO Payment Bond SuIety 2O2B Halls MiltRoad, PO Box t65O whitehouse station, NJ 08889'1650 Federal Insurance Company o + 908.903.3485 F + 908.903.3656 Bond No. 82041234 CONTRACTOR (Name,legal status and address): The Ewing Company, lnc. '1500 Eldorado, Suite 4 Boise, lD 83704 OWNER (Name,legal status anil atldras): City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, lD 83&12 CONSTRUCTION CONTRAST Date: January 9, 2018 Amount: $64,831.00 Description (Nam e and lacatio ldaho - Proiecl No. 10595.8 BOND COT.MRACTORS AS PRINCIPAL Company: The Ewing Company, |rc. Date (Not earlier than Con5,ruction Contact Date): January 9, 2018 Amount: $&,831 .00 Sixty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty One Dollars and 00/100 Modifications to this Bondr El None SURETY (Name, legal status antl principal place of bwiness): Federal Insurance Company 2028 Hall's Mill Road Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889 Sixty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty One Dollars and 00/100 n): WRRF Tertiary Filter Building A Crane, 3401 N Ten Mile Rd, Meridian, tl See Page 4 (Corporate Seal) SURETY Company: Federal Insurance SeaI) Signature: /z/;4,.{/"-*,Signature:6;7*fName and Title: Signed and Sealed this gth dayof January' 2018 (Any additional signatures appear on the last page of this Petformance Bond,) J (FOR INFORII4A?ION ONLY - Name, Address and Telephone) AGENT or BROKER: PayneWest lnsurance, lnc. 960 Broadway Avenue, Suite 100 Boise, lD 83706 208-424-2900 OWNER'S REPRESEI{TATM (Archited, Engineer or other Wny) Printed in c@peration 1,ith the American Institute of Architects (AIN by Chubb. The language in this doeament anforms to ,he lqnguoge used in AU Doarrnent 4312fl - mlo. Fofin 'S2O',+FED (R€v. UIO I []\ Any singular reference to Contractor, Surety, owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable. Attomey-in-Fact Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 110 of 475 ) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 111 of 475 L The Contractor and the Surety,jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the Owner to pay for labor, materials and equipment furnished for use in the performance ofthe Construction Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to the following terms. 2 Ifthe Contractor promptly makes payment ofall sums due to Claimants, and defends, indemnifies and holds harmless the Owner from claims, demands, liens or suits by any person or entity seeking payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance oftle Construction Contract, then the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under ttris Bond. & Ifthere is no Owner Default under the Construction Contract, the Surety's obligation to the Owner under this Bond shall arise after the Owner has promptly notified the Contractor and the Suety (at the address described in Section 13) ofclaims, demands, Iiens orsuits againstthe Owner or the Ovynefs property by any person or entity seeking papnent for labor, materials or equipment furnished for me in the performance of the Construction Contract and tendered defense ofsuch daims, demands,liens orsuits to the Contractor and the Surety. 4, when the Owner has satisfied the conditions in Section3, the Suretyshall promptlyand atthe Surety's expense defend, indemniff and hold harmless the Owner against a duly tendered claim, demand, lien or suit. 5, The Surety's obligations to a Claimant under this Bond shall arise after the following: 5.1 Claimants, who do not have a direct contract with the Contractor, ,1 have furnished a written notice of non-payment to the Contractor, stating with substantial accurary the amount claimed and the name of the party to whom the materials were, or equipment was, furnished or supplied or for whom the labor was done or performed, within ninety (9O) days after having last performed Iabor or last furnished materials or equipment included in the Claim; and ,2 have sent a Claim to the Surety (at the address described in Section 13). 52 Claimants, who are employed by or have a direct contract with the Contractor, have sent a Claim to the Surety (at the address described in Section 13). 6 lfa notice ofnon-payment required by Section 5.I.1 is given by &e O\Dner to the Contractol that is suflicient to satis$/ a Claimant's obligation to furnish a written notice ofnon-payment under Section5.1.1. 7. When a Claimant has satisfied the conditions of Sections 5.1 or 5.2, whichever is applicable, the Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's expense take the followingactions: 7J Send an answer to the Claimant, with a copy to the Owner, within sixty (60) days after receipt of the Claim, stating the amounts that are undisputed and the basis for challenging any amounts that are disputed; and 72 Pay or arrange for payment of any undisputed amounts. 73 The Suety's failure to discharge its obligations under Section 7.1 or Section 7.2 shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of defenses the Surety or Contractor may have or acquire as to a Claim, except as to undisputed amounts forwhich the Surety and Claimant have reached agreement. If, however, the Surety fails to discharge its obligations under Section 7.1 or Section 7.2, the Surety shall indemniff the Claimant for the reasonable attorney's fees the Claimant incurs thereafter to recover any sr rms found to be due and owing the Claimant. & The Suety's total obligation shall not exceed the amouDt ofthis Bond, plus the amount ofreasonable attomey's fees provided under Section 7.3, and the amountofthis Bond shall be credited for any pay,rnents made in good faith by the Surety. I Amounts owed by the Owner to the Contractor under the Construction Contract shall be used for the performance ofthe Constuction Contract and to satisft claims, if any, under any construction performance bond. By the Contractor furnishing and the Oumer accepting this Bond, they agree that all funds earned by the Contractor in the performance ofthe Construction Contract are dedicated to satis$/ obligations ofthe Contractor and the Surety under this Bond, subject to the Owner's priority to use the funds for the completion of the work. Printed. in cooperation vith the Americdn Institute of Archltects (AW by chubb. Thelonguage in this docllment @nfornl6 to rhelsnguage used in AIADoctme All2rf,.2o1o. form lso2-ot+FED (Rev.lll16) 2Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 112 of 475 10. The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner, Claimants or others for obligations ofthe Contractor that are unrelatedto the Construction Contract. The Owner shall notbe liable for the payment ofanycosts orexpenses ofany Claimant under this Bond, and shall have under this Bond no obligations to make payments to, or give notice on behalf of, Claimants or otherwise have any obligations to Claimants under this Bond. 11 The Surety hereby waives notice ofany change, including changes oftime, to the Construction Contract or to related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations. IZ No suit or action shall be commenced by a Claimant under this Bond other than in a court of competent jurisdiction in the srate in which the project that is subject of the Construction Contract is located or after the expiration of one year from the date (1) on which the Claimant sent a Claim to the Surety pursuant to Section 5.t.2 or 5.2, or (2) on which the last labor or service was performed by anyone or the last materials or equipment were fumished by anyone under the Construction Contract, whichever of(l) or (2) first occurs. If the provisions of this Paragraph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties as a defense in thejurisdiction of the suit shall be applicable. I3 Notice and Claims to the Suety, the o$'ner or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown on t}Ie page which their signature appears. Actual receipt of notice or Claims, however accomplished, shall be sufiicient compliance as ofthe date received. 14 When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location where the construction was to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said statutory or legal requirement shall be deemed deleted herefrom and provisions conforming to such statutory or other legal requirement shall be deemed incorporated herein, When so furnished, the intent is that this Bond shall be consrued as a starutory bond and not as a common law bond. lS Upon request by any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneliciary ofthis Bond, the Contractor and Owner shall promptly furnish a copy of this Bond or shall permit a copy to be made. 16. DEFINTTIONS 16.1 Claim, A qritten statement by the Claimant including at aminimum: .1 the name of the Claimant; .2 the name of the person for whom the labor was done, or materials or equipment furnished; .3a copy ofthe agreement or purchase order pursuant to which labor, materials or equipment was furnished for use in the performance ofthe Construction Contractj .4a brief description ofthe labor, materials or equipment furnished; .sthe date on which the Claimant last performed labor or last furnished materials or equipment for use in the performance of the Construction Contract; .6the total amount earned by the Claimant for labor, materials or equipment furnished as ofthe date of the Claim; .7 the total amount of previous payments received by the Claimanu and, .8fhe total aEount due and unpaid to the Claimant for labor, materials or equipment firnished as of the date of the Claim. f62 Claimana An individual or entity having a direct contact with the Contractor or with a subcontractor of &e Contractor to furnish labor, materials, or equipment for use in the performance ofthe Construction Contract. The term Claimant also includes anyindividual orentitythathas rightfullyasserted a claim under an applicable mechanic's lien or similar statute against the real property upon which the Project is located, The intent of this Bond shall be to include without limitation in the terms "labor, materials or equipment" that part of water, gas power, light, heat, oil gasoline, telephone service or rental equipment used in the Construction Contract, architectural and engineering services required for performance of the work of the Contractor Printed in coowration with the American Institute ofArchtects (NA) by Chubb. The language in thls document confoflns to the lon&&ge wed in AIA Doatmmt A312N - 2O1O, 3Folrn lso2-o5.74.FED (Rev. 11116)Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 113 of 475 and the Contractor's subcontractors, and all other items for which a mechanic's lien may be asserted in the jurisdiction where the labor, materials or equipment were furnished, lG3construction Conhact: The agreement between the Owner and the Contractor identified on the cover page, includingall Contract Documents and all changes made to the agreement and the Contract Documents. 16.4owner Default: Failure of the Owner, which has neither been remedied nor waived., to pay the Conhactor as required under the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or comply with the other material terms of the Construction Contract, 165 Contract Documents. All the documents that comprise the agreement between tle Owner and Contractor, 17. Ifthis Bond is issued for an agteement between a Contractor and subcontractor, the term Contractor in this Bond shall be deemed to be Subcontractor and the term Owner shall be deemed to be Contractor. 1& MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLO\trS: 1&1 "Claim notices for FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPAI.Iy must be sent to the following address: Chubb, PO Box 2191, Chesapeake, Virginia 3327, Attention: Surety SupportTeam." (Space is provided below for additional signatures ofadded parties, other than those appearing on the cover page.) CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL Company:(Corporate Seal) SURETY Company: Federal Insurance Company (CorqrateSeal) Signature:Signature: Name and Title: Address: Name and Title: Address: l\lnted in c@perationvih the Anerican In$inrte of Architect (AIA) W chubb. mebnguage in this dcme'nt confonns to thelanguage usedin AIA Doctment A3I 2 N. 2O1O. Eormls424r+FEDG€v.lVtO 4Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 114 of 475 EHUEIEI' Power of Attorney Federal Insurance Company I Vigilant lnsurance Company I Pacific Indemnity Company l(now AU by Those PrEsdrts, That FEDEITAJ. INSURANCE COMPANY, an lndlana colporatlo& VIGILANr INSURAiICE COMPAT{Y, a N€w York .lrporalloq and PACIFIC INDIMNITY COMPAtly, a Ws<onstn corpoEdon, do each hereby constltute and appolnt Brenda J. Smith am€ ing or alterlig the same, end consenB lo drc bodlGcadon or allaration of any iBsEum€nt r€ferred to h sald bon& or obllSatlons. SurEty Bood Numbec 82041214 Obli8.e: City of Meridian In wlhess wtcreof, r.Id FEDERAL II{SIrRANCE COMPANY, VlCltiiIT INSURANCE COMPANy, rtrd PACITIC IiIDEMNITy COMPANY have each execuled ard attested lhese p.esents and affixed thelr corporate seals on thls 6.! d.y of Januory, 2017. Suurr.-\n. eh-l.orcf Dawn M. Chhrot. Assistant Se.reaary Stephen M. Harc./, Vice Presldenl STATS OF NEW JERSEY countyofHunt rdon ss On tNs 6lr dey of lanu.ry 2017 before me, a ot ry Publlc of Iew J€6ry, peEonally cam6 Dawn IL Chloms to me lsrown to be Asltt n! S€srtary of FEDEML TNSUMNCE COXPANY, VIGILANT INSUR NCECOMPANY, and PACIFIC II{DEMNITY COMPAIIy, lhe companl.s whlct o.eorled thc for.goln8 Pow.! ofAtrlmey, and ih! sald D.irn l,L Chtorot belng by me duly swonr dld depose and say th:l she 15 Asslstant S€ffetary of FEDERAI INSURANCE COMPANY, VlGlLAlfi INSURA CE COMPANY, and PACIFIC INDEMNIIY CoMPANY and knors the corponte reals lhereof, that the seab amx€d to the foregorng Power of Attomey ar€ Eud corporate s".ls and were therEto affxed by euthority of sald thereio subic'ibed by authodty ofsald Companl6 and ln depooenCs prorence, Notarial Seal XATBERN€J. ADEIT F NOT RY A,iatE AF dEW *,68 Ito 23165 c.in6a6r, €prB rry 16 2oi, CERTIBCAT]ON Resolutlom adopted by the Bo.rds of DlrectoB of FEDEML II{SUR.ANCE COMPANy, VIGILANT INSUR,qNCE COMPAI,IY, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY CoMPANY or August 30, 2016: .ot r€d lato In th. onlln.ry co!r$ olt{5ln.s. (.ad a'wriB.n Comn tn.!q: (1) Eadr of rh. (lt&E a tle I'r6ldert .nd .h. Vl.. Prilld€ln o, thecompaykt.r.by rutho.Led nr a\e.!te!.ywrut r CoDmhEDt for.slonb.hlrorthcobpar, uld€rthc s..l oftb. Comp.ny o! oth..wl.c, toti..ndtth.t,ld.6bnLeth.dzdnydt tmr o(por.lt Fw[tcd fa ln !16 ?.nonl wn!.i +polrtm€clrs ir.h dornr?-la.6cL C3) E:.h .1$. ahdlmn, th. H&nr .nd th. Vlo. Hd.nB ol $e Conp.ryrr n.r.V.!tltorh!4 tor.don bdEllordEc.mp&y,to.ppolDr lnurltht rny p.En t,l .tt 0.r-16. E ! of t!. OohF y {It &l prlr ad.dttorlqr !o ile.lt, 6! 3d e b.Mdth. Coh!.ny, s.d.r tt. s.al o{tir Co !{o, or orba*is!, nldr Wrl&.. ConhltdlEri of rh. Cosp.ny.s n? D..9.dn dh.ad!* ff.DDolDnn.llt t hldr A.dfqtlor my h. by a.llml lype ord.s5 of rqlt|Eln Colllnllrn nE or br.p.clfcrdon of o.r or nort piBtlcsbi WrltEn CooBlt!tra|* wtttsdd.!.OoLwi{.tQ.cifi6do Eq t! hy t4r.l lFn daof t{rttrln ColrrDltn r r o! ty ryecifiqdG o{d c ttDB F.deb.littltt6 CdihlEl.nrs (9 tIE 4@rr of et.ffar c(.4[!fF!s.*.orr!r .rrt llt&r.ir CoftdMt or.r?o<eft 6 d&t&r F.dat to ltrtr 8.6.&,3d tlr s.d of dtt Comrdy, net be !fi!€rt !t facaln eotr$drWrlt!.aC.Er{tn.rtorwrltt n:pgolrt!.oto.d.1.8:{or Comlary, lln sltt R.solutlon drll lotllrdlorot!.rerb.It (r tf..r.i$. ol.ny iac! poe,.rorlurhortty otb.ryb. eji(|lygrrir.d or i{d.A' cErdfy that 0) the foregoh8 Resol'rtloB adopted by the Board of Dlrs.tors of the Companles €I€ tiu€, con€ct aod ln firll io(e and eflcct, 0l) the Compedes 3re duly llctosed and aulhorlzed to t .nsaG sllrely buslne.s ln Ell 50 of the Unlted States of Am.ri.a and the Dbtrlct of Columbh end ar€ aulhodzrd by the US, Treasry D€parhreiq ,unher Fcdcr.l and Vlgllaot are llcensed ln the US. VIrSln blads, snd Fcd.r.l ls llcensed ln Guen! Pu.ri, Rlco, aDd €ech of the Provhes o, Canada cxccpt Pdnce Etward Island; and 0ll) the fortgolog Pow€r ofAttom€y ls uue,.orIEd snd h full force and eftecL Clv€n undcrrnyhand and s.als ofsald Compantcs atwhltrhooJc Srauorl IJ, tftrs January 9,2{)1lt. @ffi@ Dawn M. Chloros, trjslsDanr lrs oFA clAl!L VEBTFY lBE AlrtflEmtoTY OF TfltS S0ND O& N0I1F1 US coMIACrUSAnEVENT 903-36569ol- 3493 A*o,,il.--- ffiW / Fom l$10.02258- U GEN coNSEM (r€.r. 12.16) OUurutn.A$.fom( Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 115 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 116 of 475 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 4H Project/File Number: Item Title: City Financial Report for November 2017 (FY18) Meetinq Notes REPORT NAME PAGE # Investment and Cash Position Graphs 2 Water - Budget to Actual Comparison 3 Wastewater - Budget to Actual Comparison 4 Public Works/Billing Budget to Actual Comparison 5 Enterprise Fund - Budget to Actual Comparison 6 Enterprise Fund - Graphs 7 Utility Sales Revenue Comparison 8 General Fund Expenditures - Budget to Actual Comparison 9 General Fund - Graphs 10 General Fund Revenue - Budget to Actual Comparison 11 Community Development - Forecast 12 Community Development - Budget to Actual Comparison 13 Community Development - Graphs 14 Overtime Graphs 15 Volunteer Hours 16 Vacant Positions 17 Internal Transfers 18 Impact Fund - Summary 19 Detailed Revenue & Expenditure Reports 20-60 Table of Contents FINANCE REPORT November 2017 CITY of MERIDIAN Month 2 of FY2018 (Oct 1 - Sep 30) Page 1 of 60Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 118 of 475 Page 2 of 60Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 119 of 475 NOTE: 1/2 Billing/Public Works = Administrative costs allocated 50% / 50% to Water and Wastewater departments. City of Meridian Water Department Incuding PW Admin Costs - Enterprise Fund Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2018 for Month Ending 11/30/2017 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance % WATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Revenue Water Sales 9,143,151 $ 1,523,859 $ 1,406,532 $ (117,327) $ -8% 1,384,550 $ 2% Miscellaneous 270,000 $ 45,000 $ 71,163 $ 26,163 $ 58% 54,410 $ 31% 1/2 Billing/Public Works 473,185 $ 78,864 $ 63,737 $ (15,127) $ -19% 35,611 $ 79% Total Revenue 9,886,336 $ 1,647,723 $ 1,541,432 $ (106,291) $ -6% 1,474,572 $ 5% Personnel Costs Administration 259,683 $ 43,280 $ 40,815 $ 2,465 $ 6% 39,879 $ 2% Operations 560,958 $ 93,493 $ 90,710 $ 2,783 $ 3% 78,189 $ 16% Distribution 622,270 $ 103,712 $ 101,637 $ 2,075 $ 2% 93,303 $ 9% Production 371,812 $ 61,969 $ 33,343 $ 28,625 $ 46% 34,818 $ -4% Backflow Prevention 132,759 $ 22,126 $ 22,234 $ (108) $ 0% 11,052 $ 101% 1/2 Billing/Public Works 2,208,755 $ 368,126 $ 288,553 $ 79,573 $ 22% 297,248 $ -3% Total Personnel Costs 4,156,236 $ 692,706 $ 577,292 $ 115,414 $ 17% 554,489 $ 4% Operating Costs Administration 568,900 $ 94,817 $ 151,181 $ (56,365) $ -59% 151,713 $ 0% Operations 484,325 $ 80,721 $ 106,051 $ (25,330) $ -31% 3,021 $ 3411% Distribution 283,480 $ 47,247 $ 29,349 $ 17,898 $ 38% 10,618 $ 176% Production 940,460 $ 156,743 $ 115,183 $ 41,561 $ 27% 82,613 $ 39% Backflow Prevention 87,440 $ 14,573 $ 3,117 $ 11,457 $ 79% 3,611 $ -14% General Fund Transfer 1,258,915 $ 209,819 $ 173,332 $ 36,487 $ 17% 164,219 $ 6% 1/2 Billing/Public Works 1,338,293 $ 223,049 $ 118,141 $ 104,908 $ 47% 111,216 $ 6% Total Operating Costs 4,961,814 $ 826,969 $ 696,354 $ 130,615 $ 16% 527,010 $ 32% Operating Income (Loss) 768,286 $ 128,048 $ 267,786 $ 139,739 $ 109% 393,073 $ -32% Capital Outlay Operations Administration 156,949 $ 26,158 $ 8,051 $ 18,107 $ 69% 9,889 $ -19% Operations 30,000 $ 5,000 $ -$ 5,000 $ 100% -$ Distribution 178,000 $ 29,667 $ 63 $ 29,603 $ 100% 7,843 $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 40,786 $ 6,798 $ -$ 6,798 $ 100% 24,070 $ -100% Total Capital Outlay 405,735 $ 67,623 $ 8,114 $ 59,508 $ 88% 41,803 $ -81% Net Income (Loss) from Operations 362,550 $ 60,425 $ 259,672 $ 199,247 $ 330% 351,270 $ -26% WATER CONSTRUCTION Revenue Residential Assessments 3,263,505 $ 543,918 $ 1,022,014 $ 478,097 $ 88% 536,214 $ 91% Commercial Assessments 294,000 $ 49,000 $ 112,106 $ 63,106 $ 129% 118,836 $ -6% Interest 150,000 $ 25,000 $ 24,376 $ (624) $ -2% 31,693 $ -23% Total Revenue 3,707,505 $ 617,918 $ 1,158,496 $ 540,578 $ 87% 686,743 $ 69% Operating Costs 18,000 $ 3,000 $ 838 $ 2,162 $ 72% 1,673 $ -50% Capital Construction Projects 12,531,620 $ 2,088,603 $ 965,040 $ 1,123,564 $ 54% 260,921 $ 270% Net Income (Loss) from Construction (8,842,115) $ (1,473,686) $ 192,618 $ 1,666,304 $ -113% 424,149 $ -55% Water Department Net Income (Loss) (8,479,565) $ (1,413,261) $ 452,290 $ 1,865,551 $ -132% 775,419 $ 30% Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date Page 3 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 120 of 475 NOTE: 1/2 Billing/Public Works = Administrative costs allocated 50% / 50% to Water and Wastewater departments. City of Meridian Waste Water Including PW Admin Costs - Enterprise Fund Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2018 for Month Ending 11/30/2017 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance % WASTE WATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Revenue Utility Sales 15,214,390 $ 2,535,732 $ 2,408,230 $ (127,501) $ -5% 2,343,827 $ 3% Miscellaneous -$ -$ 2,925 $ 2,925 $ 4,949 $ -41% 1/2 Billing/Public Works 473,185 $ 78,864 $ 63,737 $ (15,127) $ -19% 35,611 $ 79% Total Revenue 15,687,575 $ 2,614,596 $ 2,474,892 $ (139,704) $ -5% 2,384,387 $ 4% Personnel Costs Administration 289,022 $ 48,170 $ 44,056 $ 4,115 $ 9% 41,623 $ 6% Treatment Plant 1,476,793 $ 246,132 $ 213,176 $ 32,956 $ 13% 215,916 $ -1% Collection Lines 558,456 $ 93,076 $ 69,923 $ 23,154 $ 25% 53,396 $ 31% Pretreatment Division 159,417 $ 26,570 $ 23,304 $ 3,265 $ 12% 24,996 $ -7% Lab 439,241 $ 73,207 $ 66,967 $ 6,239 $ 9% 64,917 $ 3% 1/2 Billing/Public Works 2,208,755 $ 368,126 $ 288,553 $ 79,573 $ 22% 297,248 $ -3% Total Personnel Costs 5,131,684 $ 855,281 $ 705,979 $ 149,302 $ 17% 698,096 $ 1% Operating Costs Administration 404,259 $ 67,376 $ 45,359 $ 22,018 $ 33% 82,704 $ -45% Treatment Plant 1,998,540 $ 333,090 $ 226,692 $ 106,398 $ 32% 227,163 $ 0% Collection Lines 590,698 $ 98,450 $ 25,618 $ 72,831 $ 74% 50,357 $ -49% Pretreatment Division 21,380 $ 3,563 $ 260 $ 3,304 $ 93% 935 $ -72% Lab 232,580 $ 38,763 $ 39,369 $ (606) $ -2% 27,340 $ 44% General Fund Transfer 1,258,916 $ 209,820 $ 175,949 $ 33,871 $ 16% 166,786 $ 5% 1/2 Billing/Public Works 1,338,293 $ 223,049 $ 118,141 $ 104,908 $ 47% 111,216 $ 6% Total Operating Costs 5,844,666 $ 974,112 $ 631,388 $ 342,723 $ 35% 666,500 $ -5% Operating Income (Loss) 4,711,224 $ 785,203 $ 1,137,525 $ 352,322 $ 45% 1,019,792 $ 12% Capital Outlay Operations Administration 46,779 $ 7,797 $ -$ 7,797 $ 100% 100 $ -100% Treatment Plant 55,000 $ 9,167 $ 9,346 $ (180) $ -2% -$ Collection Lines 30,000 $ 5,000 $ -$ 5,000 $ 100% -$ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 40,786 $ 6,798 $ -$ 6,798 $ 100% 24,070 $ -100% Total Capital Outlay 172,565 $ 28,761 $ 9,346 $ 19,414 $ 68% 24,170 $ -61% Net Income (Loss) from Operations 4,538,659 $ 756,442 $ 1,128,179 $ 332,908 $ 44% 995,621 $ 13% WASTE WATER CONSTRUCTION Revenue Residential Assessments 7,158,816 $ 1,193,136 $ 2,011,912 $ 818,776 $ 69% 1,025,384 $ 96% Commercial Assessments 441,000 $ 73,500 $ 253,343 $ 179,843 $ 245% 229,179 $ 11% EPA Compliance Revenue 1,480,337 $ 246,723 $ 248,932 $ 2,209 $ 1% 238,332 $ 4% Interest 100,000 $ 16,667 $ 46,668 $ 30,001 $ 180% 62,336 $ -25% Miscellaneous -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,431 $ -100% Total Revenue 9,180,153 $ 1,530,026 $ 2,560,855 $ 1,030,829 $ 67% 1,575,662 $ 63% Operating Costs 35,000 $ 5,833 $ 1,676 $ 4,158 $ 71% 3,346 $ -50% Capital Construction Projects 56,601,714 $ 9,433,619 $ 3,675,698 $ 5,757,922 $ 61% 1,041,222 $ 253% Net Income (Loss) from Construction (47,456,561) $ (7,909,427) $ (1,116,518) $ (4,731,250) $ 60% 531,094 $ -310% Waste Water Department Net Income (Loss) (42,917,902) $ (7,152,985) $ 11,660 $ (4,398,342) $ 61% 1,526,715 $ 0% Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date Page 4 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 121 of 475 NOTE: Administrative Costs are allocated to Water and Wastewater departments 50%/50% City of Meridian Enterprise Overhead - Public Works/Utility Billing/Environmental Divisions Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2018 for Month Ending 11/30/2017 Prior Year to Date Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual Revenue PW Review Fees 200,000 $ 33,333 $ 63,664 $ 30,330 $ 91% 69,684 $ Utility Billing Fees 746,369 $ 124,395 $ 63,810 $ (60,585) $ -49% 1,539 $ Total Revenue 946,369 $ 157,728 $ 127,474 $ (30,254) $ -19% 71,223 $ Personnel Costs 4,417,510 $ 736,252 $ 577,105 $ 159,147 $ 22% 594,497 $ Operating Expense 2,676,587 $ 446,099 $ 236,282 $ 209,817 $ 47% 222,431 $ Transfers 321,252 $ 53,542 $ 27,264 $ 26,278 $ 49% 26,580 $ Total OE 2,997,839 $ 499,641 $ 263,547 $ 236,095 $ 47% 249,011 $ Total PC & OE 7,415,348 $ 1,235,893 $ 840,652 $ 395,241 $ 32% 843,508 $ Operating Income (Loss) (6,468,979) $ (1,078,165) $ (713,178) $ 364,987 $ -34% (772,286) $ Capital Outlay 81,573 $ 13,595 $ -$ 13,595 $ 100% 48,141 $ Net Income (Loss) (6,550,552) $ (1,091,760) $ (713,178) $ 351,391 $ -32% (820,427) $ Budget to Actual Page 5 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 122 of 475 City of Meridian Total Enterprise Fund Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2018 for Month Ending 11/30/17 Unrestricted Net Position at 9/30/2017 50,340,000 $ PRELIMINARY Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $ TOTAL UTILITY OPERATIONS Operating Revenue Water Sales 9,143,151 $ 1,523,859 $ 1,406,532 $ (117,327) $ 1,384,550 $ 21,982 $ Wastewater Sales 15,214,390 $ 2,535,732 $ 2,408,230 $ (127,501) $ 2,343,827 $ 64,403 $ Public Works/Utility Billing 946,369 $ 157,728 $ 127,474 $ (30,254) $ 71,223 $ 56,251 $ Miscellaneous 270,000 $ 45,000 $ 74,088 $ 29,088 $ 59,359 $ 14,729 $ Total Revenue 25,573,910 $ 4,262,318 $ 4,016,324 $ (245,994) $ 3,858,959 $ 157,365 $ Personnel Costs Water Division 1,947,481 $ 324,580 $ 288,739 $ 35,841 $ 257,241 $ 31,498 $ Wastewater Division 2,922,930 $ 487,155 $ 417,426 $ 69,729 $ 400,848 $ 16,579 $ Public Works/Utility Billing 4,417,510 $ 736,252 $ 577,105 $ 159,147 $ 594,497 $ (17,392) $ Total Personnel Costs 9,287,921 $ 1,547,987 $ 1,283,270 $ 264,716 $ 1,252,585 $ 30,685 $ Operating Costs Water Division 2,364,605 $ 394,101 $ 404,881 $ (10,780) $ 251,575 $ 153,305 $ Wastewater Division 3,247,456 $ 541,243 $ 337,298 $ 203,945 $ 388,498 $ (51,200) $ Public Works/Utility Billing 2,676,587 $ 446,098 $ 236,282 $ 209,815 $ 222,431 $ 13,851 $ Total Operating Costs 8,288,648 $ 1,381,441 $ 978,461 $ 402,980 $ 862,505 $ 115,956 $ Total PC & OE 17,576,568 $ 2,929,428 $ 2,261,731 $ 667,697 $ 2,115,090 $ 146,641 $ Capital Operations 578,301 $ 96,383 $ 17,461 $ 78,923 $ 65,973 $ (48,512) $ General Fund Transfer 2,839,084 $ 473,181 $ 376,546 $ 357,585 $ Operations Income (Loss) 4,579,957 $ 763,325 $ 1,360,586 $ 597,261 $ 1,320,311 $ 40,275 $ CONSTRUCTION Construction Revenue Residential Assessments 10,187,618 $ 1,697,936 $ 1,745,386 $ 47,450 $ 1,217,457 $ 527,929 $ Commercial Assessments 735,000 $ 122,500 $ 365,449 $ 242,949 $ 348,015 $ 17,433 $ Multi-Family Assessments 234,703 $ 39,117 $ 1,288,540 $ 1,249,423 $ 344,141 $ 944,399 $ EPA Compliance Revenue 1,480,337 $ 246,723 $ 248,932 $ 2,209 $ 238,332 $ 10,601 $ Miscellaneous -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,431 $ (20,431) $ Interest 250,000 $ 41,667 $ 71,044 $ 29,377 $ 94,029 $ (22,985) $ Total Construction Revenue 12,887,658 $ 2,147,943 $ 3,719,350 $ 1,571,407 $ 2,262,405 $ 1,456,946 $ Operating Costs Construction 53,000 $ 8,833 $ 2,514 $ 6,320 $ 5,018 $ (2,505) $ Capital Construction Projects 69,133,335 $ 11,522,222 $ 4,640,737 $ 6,881,485 $ 1,302,143 $ 3,338,594 $ Construction Income (Loss) (56,298,677) $ (9,383,113) $ (923,900) $ (8,459,212) $ 955,243 $ (1,879,144) $ Enterprise Fund Net Income (Loss) (51,718,720) $ (8,619,787) $ 436,686 $ Fund Balance (1,378,720) $ 41,720,213 $ 50,776,686 $ NOTE: BUDGET includes full carry-forward as estimated in July - expense will be adjusted down in January 2018 Page 6 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 123 of 475 City of Meridian Enterprise Fund Graphs FY2018 for Month Ending 11/30/2017 Notes: * The revenues and costs for Public Works Administration and for General Fund Support services are split evenly between Water and Wastewater * Depreciation expense is not included in these graphs. $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 FY2008FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2013FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018 YTD Utility Connection / Assessment Revenue Water Connection Revenue Sewer Connection Revenue Budget Includes Full Carryover from July'17; will to adjusted Jan'18 Page 7 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 124 of 475 8 of 60 Utility Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 125 of 475 Page 9 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 126 of 475 Page 10 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 127 of 475 Total Revenue does not include Community Development Permit Revenues City of Meridian General Fund Revenue FY2018 Budget to Actual Comparison As of 11/30/2017 Budget with Amendments Current Period Actual Current Year Actual Budget Remaining Percent of Budget Remaining Prior Year Actual Taxes General Property Tax Revenue 30,808,064.04 13,715.19 58,394.43 30,749,669.61 99.81% 66,168.08 Total Taxes 30,808,064.04 13,715.19 58,394.43 30,749,669.61 99.81% 66,168.08 Licenses & Permits Liquor License Revenues 75,258.00 600.00 1,200.00 74,058.00 98.40% 850.00 Misc Licenses/Permits Revenues 9,999.96 445.00 1,895.00 8,104.96 81.04% 1,025.00 Fire Inspection & Permit Fees 0.00 1,566.00 1,913.00 (1,913.00) 0.00% 966.00 Dog License Revenues 45,000.00 1,149.00 2,361.50 42,638.50 94.75% 4,182.70 Total Licenses & Permits 130,257.96 3,760.00 7,369.50 122,888.46 94.34% 7,023.70 Intergovernmental Grant Revenues 473,492.04 0.00 0.00 473,492.04 100.00% (6,744.00) State Revenue Sharing Revenue 5,982,741.00 0.00 0.00 5,982,741.00 100.00% 0.00 State Liquor Apportionment Revenue 834,960.00 0.00 0.00 834,960.00 100.00% 0.00 Rural Fire & Misc Revenue 2,465,653.08 187,800.20 187,800.20 2,277,852.88 92.38% 92,094.36 Meridian Downtown Development 415,755.00 0.00 0.00 415,755.00 100.00% 0.00 Total Intergovernmental 10,172,601.12 187,800.20 187,800.20 9,984,800.92 98.15% 85,350.36 Franchise Fees Gas Franchise Revenue 600,000.00 0.00 0.00 600,000.00 100.00% 0.00 Cable TV Franchise Revenue 200,000.04 0.00 0.00 200,000.04 100.00% 0.00 Electricity Franchise Revenue 510,000.00 0.00 0.00 510,000.00 100.00% 0.00 Total Franchise Fees 1,310,000.04 0.00 0.00 1,310,000.04 100.00% 0.00 Fines & Forfeitures False Alarm Fees 2,000.04 2,335.00 4,765.00 (2,764.96) (138.24)% 6,285.00 Court Revenue 350,000.04 37,864.88 37,864.88 312,135.16 89.18% 26,487.16 Restitution 0.00 514.69 856.33 (856.33) 0.00% 526.67 State Drug Seizure Revenue 0.00 0.00 2,100.00 (2,100.00) 0.00% 422.00 Fines, Forfeit Revenues 5,000.04 1,255.00 1,975.00 3,025.04 60.50% 1,350.00 Total Fines & Forfeitures 357,000.12 41,969.57 47,561.21 309,438.91 86.68% 35,070.83 Charges for services Dept Svc Fees 48,000.00 0.00 0.00 48,000.00 100.00% 0.00 Passport Revenues 0.00 5,575.00 11,425.00 (11,425.00) 0.00% 10,175.00 Reimbursement Revenues 30,000.00 25,425.11 26,958.30 3,041.70 10.13% 15,812.56 School Resource Revenue 423,516.00 0.00 1,973.78 421,542.22 99.53% 1,765.94 Rental Income 21,999.96 14,275.85 23,859.70 (1,859.74) (8.45)% 25,444.70 Cherry Lane Golf Lease Revenue 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 (6,000.00) 0.00% 0.00 Park Reservations Fee Revenue 112,200.00 10,975.98 22,246.54 89,953.46 80.17% 2,988.62 Recreation Class Revenues 237,500.04 5,010.00 13,771.38 223,728.66 94.20% 13,931.32 Community Event Rev/Sponsorship 57,500.04 5,470.00 10,495.00 47,005.04 81.74% 9,243.79 Sports Revenue 244,500.00 4,694.43 8,995.74 235,504.26 96.32% 24,649.55 Contract Service Revenues 6,999.96 334.96 444.96 6,555.00 93.64% 50.00 Total Charges for services 1,182,216.00 71,761.33 126,170.40 1,056,045.60 89.33% 104,061.48 Impact revenues Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 110,527.56 319,948.20 (319,948.20) 0.00% 200,694.78 Impact Rev - Commercial 80,000.04 15,439.32 23,090.40 56,909.64 71.13% 85,655.52 Impact Rev - Residential 1,714,436.04 233,311.32 523,182.96 1,191,253.08 69.48% 383,524.67 Total Impact revenues 1,794,436.08 359,278.20 866,221.56 928,214.52 51.73% 669,874.97 Donations Donations (plus project code) 5,000.04 4,470.00 33,556.00 (28,555.96) (571.11)% 13,734.12 MAC Arts Commission Revenues 9,999.96 35.00 35.00 9,964.96 99.64% 0.00 Total Donations 15,000.00 4,505.00 33,591.00 (18,591.00) (123.94)% 13,734.12 Interest Revenues Interest Earnings 142,000.08 65,407.81 126,801.99 15,198.09 10.70% 72,955.99 Total Interest Revenues 142,000.08 65,407.81 126,801.99 15,198.09 10.70% 72,955.99 Miscellaneous revenues Recycled Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 3,335.00 Miscellaneous Revenues 27,000.00 1,068.05 1,068.05 25,931.95 96.04% 1,101.44 Total Miscellaneous revenues 27,000.00 1,068.05 1,068.05 25,931.95 96.04% 4,436.44 TOTAL REVENUES 45,938,575.44 749,265.35 1,454,978.34 44,483,597.10 96.83% 1,058,675.97 Sale of capital assets GAIN Sale of Assets - Gain(Loss) 0.00 5,346.50 5,939.50 (5,939.50) 0.00% 70.00 Total Sale of capital assets GAIN 0.00 5,346.50 5,939.50 (5,939.50) 0.00% 70.00 TOTAL REVENUE plus Sale of Assets 45,938,575.44 754,611.85 1,460,917.84 44,477,657.60 96.81% 1,058,745.97 11 of 60 Revenue Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 128 of 475 City of Meridian Community Development Services Year End Change to Fund Balance Forecast FY2018 for Month Ending 11/30/2017 Total Original Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD Projected TOTAL DEV. SVCS. REVENUE Commercial Permits 833,000 $ 138,833 $ 151,215 $ 907,291 $ All other Permits 3,949,560 $ 658,260 $ 993,611 $ 5,961,664 $ Planning Revenue 200,000 $ 33,333 $ 69,750 $ 418,500 $ Miscellaneous Revenue -$ -$ 40 $ 240 $ Total Revenues 4,982,560 $ 830,427 $ 1,214,616 $ 7,287,695 $ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICE FUND Revenue 4,982,560 $ 830,427 $ 1,214,616 $ 7,287,695 $ PC 1,538,413 $ 256,402 $ 204,220 $ 1,225,318 $ OE 2,254,753 $ 375,792 $ 463,181 $ 2,779,088 $ Net Operating to Fund Balance 1,189,394 $ 198,232 $ 547,215 $ 3,283,289 $ CO & Interfund Transfers 54,515 $ 9,086 $ 4,457 $ 26,740 $ Total Change to Fund Balance 1,134,879 $ 189,146 $ 542,758 $ 3,256,548 $ FY2003 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $585,467 FY2004 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $799,548 FY2005 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,897,123 FY2006 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,815,539 FY2007 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,172,405 FY2008 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0 FY2009 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0 FY2010 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0 FY2011 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $600,722 FY2012 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,044,914 FY2013 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,592,539 FY2014 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,391,676 FY2015 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,652,245 FY2016 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,275,054 TOTAL $17,827,232 Projected Transfer Page 12 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 129 of 475 City of Meridian Community Development Services Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2018 for Month Ending 11/30/2017 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $ ADMINISTRATION Personnel Costs 228,418 $ 38,070 $ 9,589 $ 28,481 $ 75% 32,584 $ (22,995) $ Operating Expenses 85,788 $ 14,298 $ 8,796 $ 5,502 $ 38% 5,138 $ 3,658 $ Total PC & OE 314,206 $ 52,368 $ 18,386 $ 33,982 $ 65% 37,722 $ (19,336) $ Interfund Transfers 86,477 $ 14,413 $ 9,782 $ 4,631 $ 32% 9,679 $ 103 $ PLANNING Personnel Costs 697,635 $ 116,273 $ 96,988 $ 19,285 $ 17% 87,907 $ 9,080 $ Operating Expenses 41,019 $ 6,837 $ 5,094 $ 1,743 $ 25% 4,822 $ 272 $ Total PC and OE 738,654 $ 123,109 $ 102,081 $ 21,028 $ 17% 92,729 $ 9,352 $ BUILDING Personnel Costs 484,249 $ 80,708 $ 78,243 $ 2,465 $ 3% 73,378 $ 4,865 $ Operating Expenses 2,005,656 $ 334,276 $ 446,087 $ (111,811) $ -33% 364,830 $ 81,257 $ Total PC & OE 2,489,905 $ 414,984 $ 524,331 $ (109,346) $ -26% 438,208 $ 86,123 $ Interfund Transfers (59,451) $ (9,908) $ (9,790) $ (119) $ 1% (9,290) $ (500) $ ECONOMIC DEVLP Personnel Costs 128,111 $ 21,352 $ 19,400 $ 1,952 $ 9% 19,098 $ 302 $ Operating Expenses 122,290 $ 20,382 $ 3,204 $ 17,178 $ 84% 527 $ 2,676 $ Total PC & OE 250,401 $ 41,733 $ 22,603 $ 19,130 $ 46% 19,625 $ 2,978 $ Interfund Transfers 27,489 $ 4,582 $ 4,464 $ 117 $ 3% 4,757 $ (292) $ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICE FUND Personnel Costs 1,538,413 $ 256,402 $ 204,220 $ 52,183 $ 20% 212,966 $ (8,747) $ Operating Expenses 2,254,753 $ 375,792 $ 463,181 $ (87,389) $ -23% 375,318 $ 87,864 $ Total PC and OE 3,793,166 $ 632,194 $ 667,401 $ (35,207) $ -6% 588,284 $ 79,117 $ Capital Outlay -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interfund Transfers 54,515 $ 9,086 $ 4,457 $ 4,629 $ 51% 5,146 $ (689) $ NOTE: Interfund Transfers = 25.42% of City Hall costs transfer to Community Development Services Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date City of Meridian Building Department Permit Revenue compared to Building Inspectors Expense FY2018 for Month Ending 11/30/2017 % of Permit Fee Inspectors Gross Revenue Inspector Expense Rev. vs. Exp. that Goes to City Building Inspections 750,478 $ 172,388 $ 578,090 $ 77% Mechanical Inspections 119,998 $ 71,999 $ 47,999 $ 40% Electrical Inspections 74,260 $ 52,595 $ 21,665 $ 29% Plumbing Inspections 110,294 $ 66,177 $ 44,118 $ 40% Fire Inspections 91,659 $ 65,612 $ 26,047 $ 28% Total 1,146,689 $ 428,771 $ 717,918 $ 63% Page 13 of 60Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 130 of 475 Page 14 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 131 of 475 Page 15 of 60 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 132 of 475 Page 16 of 60Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 133 of 475 City of Meridian City of Meridian City of Meridian City of Meridian Vacancy Report November 2017 Vacancy Report November 2017 Vacancy Report November 2017 Vacancy Report November 2017 Position Position Position Position FTE FTE FTE FTE Fund Fund Fund Fund Department Department Department Department HR Status HR Status HR Status HR Status Position Vacant Date Position Vacant Date Position Vacant Date Position Vacant Date Position Posted Position Posted Position Posted Position Posted Date Date Date Date Position Start Date Position Start Date Position Start Date Position Start Date Development Analyst I 1 Enterprise Building No Request to Fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Public Works Inspector I - Reclassed to Public Works Inspector II 1 Enterprise PW Interviews in Progress New position as of 10/01/2017 11/6/2017 Not yet filled Staff Engineer II 1 Enterprise PW Accepting Applications 10/21/2017 11/13/2017 Not yet filled Cross Connection Control Inspector II 1 Enterprise PW-Water Selection in Progress 10/22/2017 10/6/2017 Not yet filled Water Operator I 1 Enterprise PW-Water Offer Accepted 9/27/2017 10/6/2017 12/11/2017 Tentative Collection System Technician II 1 Enterprise PW-WW On Hold by Department will review in January 8/21/2017 10/9/2017 Not yet filled Wastewater Superintendent 1 Enterprise PW-WW Interviews in Progress 6/21/2017 6/27/2017 Not yet filled WW Work Person-Title changed to Plant Utility Technician 1 Enterprise PW-WW Offer Accepted 8/30/2017 9/13/2017 12/11/2017 Deputy City Clerk 1 General City Clerk Accepting Applications 11/2/2017 11/29/2017 Not yet filled Building Maintenance Worker 1 General City Hall Offer Accepted New position as of 10/01/2017 9/1/2017 12/11/2017 Tentative Community Development Director 1 General Community Development Interviews in Progress 8/20/2017 8/18/2017 Not yet filled Administrative Assistant 1 General Finance Interviews in Progress New position as of 10/01/2017 8/23/2017 Not yet filled Financial Analyst 1 General Finance Accepting Applications New position as of 10/01/2017 8/23/2017 Not yet filled Firefighter 1 General Fire Offer Accepted 9/21/2017 9/30/2017 1/22/2018 Fire Education & Prevention Assistant P/t 0.5 General Fire Accepting Applications 11/16/2017 11/13/2017 Not yet filled Fire Fighter 1 General Fire Offer Accepted 9/21/2017 9/30/2017 1/22/2018 Fire Fighter 1 General Fire Offer Accepted 10/26/2017 9/30/2017 1/22/2018 Support Technician 1 General IT Offer Accepted 10/21/2017 10/23/2017 TBD Groundskeeper III 1 General Parks No request to fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Home Court Facility Specialist 0.5 General Parks No Request to Fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Home Court Facility Specialist 0.5 General Parks No Request to Fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Recreation Camp Coordinator 0.5 General Parks No Request to Fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Code Enforcement Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress New position as of 10/01/2017 5/17/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress 9/15/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Offer Accepted 3/27/2017 4/4/2017 2/26/2018 Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress 6/20/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress 10/21/2017 11/16/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress 3/29/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress 8/22/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress 10/21/2017 11/16/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Accepting Applications Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Accepting Applications Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Accepting Applications Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Accepting Applications Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Accepting Applications Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Accepting Applications Interviews Scheduled 11/2/2017 11/16/2017 Not yet filled Building Maintenance Technician 1 General PW No Request to Fill at this time 8/25/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled TOTAL FTE TOTAL FTE TOTAL FTE TOTAL FTE 37 37 37 37 17 of 60 VacantPositionsMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 134 of 475 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n In t e r f u n d T r a n s f e r s FY 2 0 1 7 Ef f e c t i v e D a t e Ge n e r a l F u n d Enterprise Fund tr a n s f e r e x p e n s e t o E N T E R P R I S E F U N D ( w a t e r & s e w e r fu n d ) 15 % o f M a y o r ' s O f f i c e p e r s o n n e l c o s t s (e x c e p t M a y o r w a g e & b e n e f i t s ) t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 0 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f F i n a n c e e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 0 0 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f H R e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 0 2 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f I T e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 0 4 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f L e g a l e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 2 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f I T C a p i t a l e x p e n s e t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u d FY 2 0 1 6 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e tr a n s f e r C i t y H a l l c o s t s t o t h e f o l l o w i n g : 13 % F i r e D e p a r t m e n t i n t h e G e n e r a l F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d 8. 4 2 % P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n i n t h e G e n e r a l F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d 12 . 9 2 % C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t i n t h e G e n e r a l F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d 23 . 0 8 % P u b l i c W o r k s i n t h e E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Pe r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r s : Bl d g D e p t M g r 5 0 % f r o m B u i l d i n g D e p a r t m e n t t o P u b l i c W or k s F Y 2 0 0 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Ca p i t a l P r o j e c t s M g r 5 0 % f r o m O t h e r G o v t t o P u b l i c W o r k s FY 2 0 0 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Co m m u n i c a t i o n s M g r 5 0 % f r o m O t h e r G o v t t o P u b l i c W o r k s FY 2 0 0 3 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 18 o f 6 0 Transfers Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 3 5 o f 4 7 5 City of Meridian IMPACT FUND BALANCE as of 11/30/2017 Account # Account Description Total Budget - Original Total Budget - Revised Current Year Actual Budget Remaining 2110 - Police Department REVENUES 34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 0.00 29,585.40 (29,585.40) 34780 Commercial Impact Revenue 20,000.00 0.00 4,489.80 15,510.20 34781 Residential Impact Revenue 176,436.00 0.00 40,173.12 136,262.88 Total REVENUES 196,436.00 0.00 74,248.32 122,187.68 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2210 - Fire Department REVENUES 34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 0.00 121,235.40 (121,235.40) 34780 Commercial Impact Revenue 60,000.00 0.00 18,600.60 41,399.40 34781 Residential Impact Revenue 500,000.04 0.00 163,116.72 336,883.32 Total REVENUES 560,000.04 0.00 302,952.72 257,047.32 54000 Equipment & Supplies 20,000.04 0.00 0.00 20,000.04 92000 Cap Outlay - Bldg & Struct 3,548,000.04 0.00 0.00 3,548,000.04 94120 Capital - Fire Trucks 718,500.00 0.00 0.00 718,500.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,286,500.08 0.00 0.00 4,286,500.08 5200 - Parks & Recreation REVENUES 34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 0.00 168,854.40 (168,854.40) 34781 Residential Impact Revenue 1,038,000.00 0.00 319,893.12 718,106.88 36100 Interest Earnings 15,000.00 0.00 15,429.95 (429.95) Total REVENUES 1,053,000.00 0.00 504,177.47 548,822.53 55102 Investment Services 0.00 0.00 189.67 (189.67) 93415 Borup Property construction 156,699.24 0.00 0.00 156,699.24 96925 Keith Bird Legacy Park construction 1,268,969.76 0.00 184,217.80 1,084,751.96 96927 77 acre South Park 3,585,115.44 0.00 103,796.52 3,481,318.92 96928 Reta Huskey Park Construction 1,104,773.16 0.00 39,058.51 1,065,714.65 96929 Hillsdale Park Construction 1,311,096.24 0.00 230,582.36 1,080,513.88 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 7,426,653.84 0.00 557,844.86 6,868,808.98 TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES for FY2017 11,713,153.92 Dept FY2018 beginning fund balance FY2018 net change YTD Fund Balance YTD Police Department $ 1,172,284.45 74,248.32 1,246,532.77 $ Fire Department $ 5,108,042.38 302,952.72 5,410,995.10 $ Parks & Recreation $ 6,263,470.36 (53,667.39) 6,209,802.97 $ TOTAL IMPACT FUND BALANCE 12,543,797.19 323,533.65 12,867,330.84 Page 19 of 60Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 136 of 475 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co u n c i l 1 1 2 0 - C o u n c i l Co u n c i l PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Co u n c i l A d m i n i s t r a t i v e W a g e s 6 1 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 8 3 1 0 , 1 6 7 5 0 , 8 3 3 8 3 . 3 3 % 1 0 , 1 6 7 Co u n c i l F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 4, 6 6 7 0 3 1 5 6 3 1 4 , 0 3 6 8 6 . 4 8 % 5 9 5 Co u n c i l P E R S I 7, 2 8 3 0 5 7 5 1 , 1 5 1 6 , 1 3 3 8 4 . 1 9 % 1 , 1 5 1 Co u n c i l W o r k e r s ' C o m p 13 4 0 0 0 1 3 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 9 0 , 1 7 4 0 6, 1 9 0 12 , 3 8 0 77 , 7 9 4 86.27%12,378 Co u n c i l T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 16 3 , 2 5 8 0 12 , 1 6 4 24 , 3 2 8 13 8 , 9 3 0 85.10%24,291 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Co u n c i l O f f i c e E x p e n s e 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 3 6 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 3 Co u n c i l P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 4 0 0 1 9 3 8 2 0 2 8 4 . 3 0 % 8 2 Co u n c i l B u s i n e s s M e a l s 3, 2 5 0 0 9 2 2 8 0 2 , 9 7 0 9 1 . 3 7 % 1 4 6 Co u n c i l M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 , 5 4 5 0 3 5 3 5 4 , 5 1 0 9 9 . 2 2 % 4 6 0 Co u n c i l T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 8 6 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 8 0 Co u n c i l T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 3 , 7 6 4 0 0 0 3 , 7 6 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 2 9 Co u n c i l T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1 , 2 9 6 0 0 0 1 , 2 9 6 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 8 9 Co u n c i l H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 90 0 0 0 90 100.00%0 Co u n c i l T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 16 , 2 5 5 0 14 6 35 3 15 , 9 0 2 97.83%2,289 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 17 9 , 5 1 3 0 12 , 3 1 0 24 , 6 8 1 15 4 , 8 3 2 86.25%26,580 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 17 9 , 5 1 3 0 12 , 3 1 0 24 , 6 8 1 15 4 , 8 3 2 86.25%26,580 Co u n c i l Pa g e 2 0 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 3 7 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Cl e r k 1 1 4 0 - C i t y C l e r k Cl e r k RE V E N U E S Cl e r k L i q u o r L i c e n s e R e v e n u e s 7 5 , 2 5 8 0 6 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 7 4 , 0 5 8 9 8 . 4 0 % 8 5 0 Cl e r k M i s c L i c e n s e s / P e r m i t s R e v e n u e s 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 4 4 5 1 , 8 9 5 8 , 1 0 5 8 1 . 0 4 % 1 , 0 2 5 Cl e r k D e p t S v c F e e s 48 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k P a s s p o r t R e v e n u e s 0 0 5, 5 7 5 11 , 4 2 5 (1 1 , 4 2 5 ) 0.00%10,175 Cl e r k T o t a l R E V E N U E S 13 3 , 2 5 8 0 6, 6 2 0 14 , 5 2 0 11 8 , 7 3 8 89.10%12,050 Cl e r k PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Cl e r k W a g e s 39 5 , 2 1 6 0 3 0 , 1 0 5 5 9 , 1 0 6 3 3 6 , 1 1 0 8 5 . 0 4 % 5 6 , 8 6 6 Cl e r k O v e r t i m e W a g e s 1, 0 9 9 0 2 6 1 5 3 9 4 7 8 6 . 1 2 % 2 9 Cl e r k F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 30 , 3 1 8 0 2 , 2 1 3 4 , 3 4 8 2 5 , 9 7 0 8 5 . 6 5 % 4 , 1 2 7 Cl e r k P E R S I 47 , 3 2 0 0 2 , 8 3 6 6 , 1 3 3 4 1 , 1 8 7 8 7 . 0 3 % 6 , 4 4 1 Cl e r k W o r k e r s ' C o m p 1, 2 6 6 0 0 0 1 , 2 6 6 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 1 2 1 , 6 7 2 0 7, 7 3 8 15 , 4 7 6 10 6 , 1 9 6 87.28%14,242 Cl e r k T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 59 6 , 8 9 2 0 42 , 9 1 7 85 , 2 1 6 51 1 , 6 7 6 85.72%81,705 Cl e r k OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Cl e r k O f f i c e E x p e n s e 3, 7 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 9 6 3 , 3 0 4 8 9 . 3 0 % 5 7 4 Cl e r k C o p i e r E x p e n s e 7, 0 8 1 0 1 , 0 0 2 1 , 0 0 2 6 , 0 7 9 8 5 . 8 4 % 9 9 9 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 4 8 0 0 0 (9 ) 48 9 1 0 1 . 8 3 % 8 0 Cl e r k C o d i f i c a t i o n E x p e n s e s 6 , 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 , 1 3 9 4 , 8 6 1 8 1 . 0 1 % 0 Cl e r k S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 3 , 4 7 3 0 0 2 , 5 1 9 2 0 , 9 5 4 8 9 . 2 7 % 2 , 3 4 6 Cl e r k E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 1 , 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 2 0 , 0 0 0 (2 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 2 9 0 Cl e r k B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 6 , 0 0 0 0 2 9 6 2 9 6 5 , 7 0 4 9 5 . 0 6 % 0 Cl e r k C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 1 7 , 9 0 0 8 9 . 5 0 % 0 Cl e r k P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 6 , 3 0 0 0 0 6 3 1 5 , 6 6 9 8 9 . 9 7 % 8 2 9 Cl e r k C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 60 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 8 Cl e r k B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 5 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 5 , 2 9 0 0 0 2 0 5 , 2 7 0 9 9 . 6 2 % 6 0 Cl e r k T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 35 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 35 4 0 0 0 3 5 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k L e g a l N o t i c e s 2, 0 0 0 0 1 6 3 2 5 4 1 , 7 4 6 8 7 . 2 9 % 0 Cl e r k D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 0 Cl e r k H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 12 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k E l e c t i o n s 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 100.00%0 Pa g e 2 1 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 3 8 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Cl e r k T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 85 , 5 8 8 0 1, 7 5 4 8, 3 4 8 77 , 2 4 0 90.25%7,380 Cl e r k DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 68 2 , 4 7 9 0 44 , 6 7 1 93 , 5 6 4 58 8 , 9 1 5 86.29%89,085 Cl e r k TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 68 2 , 4 7 9 0 44 , 6 7 1 93 , 5 6 4 58 8 , 9 1 5 86.29%89,085 Pa g e 2 2 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 3 9 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ma y o r 1 3 1 0 - M a y o r ' s O f f i c e Ma y o r RE V E N U E S Ma y o r R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 9 Ma y o r C o m m u n i t y E v e n t R e v / S p o n s o r s h i p 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 5 , 0 0 0 0 3, 5 7 5 21 , 0 7 5 (1 6 , 0 7 5 ) (321.49)%1,357 Ma y o r T o t a l R E V E N U E S 25 , 0 0 0 0 3, 5 7 5 21 , 0 7 5 3, 9 2 5 15.70%1,376 Ma y o r Ma y o r PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Ma y o r A d m i n i s t r a t i v e W a g e s 9 0 , 9 5 8 0 7 , 5 8 0 1 5 , 1 5 9 7 5 , 7 9 9 8 3 . 3 3 % 1 4 , 4 3 8 Ma y o r W a g e s 21 8 , 2 0 3 0 1 8 , 1 8 9 3 6 , 3 4 5 1 8 1 , 8 5 8 8 3 . 3 4 % 3 8 , 0 3 6 Ma y o r F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 23 , 6 5 1 0 1 , 8 8 5 3 , 7 6 8 1 9 , 8 8 3 8 4 . 0 6 % 3 , 7 6 1 Ma y o r P E R S I 36 , 9 1 4 0 2 , 9 1 7 5 , 8 3 0 3 1 , 0 8 4 8 4 . 2 0 % 5 , 9 4 0 Ma y o r W o r k e r s ' C o m p 1, 2 4 8 0 0 0 1 , 2 4 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 7 5 , 1 4 5 0 6, 0 3 6 12 , 0 7 2 63 , 0 7 3 83.93%13,164 Ma y o r T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 44 6 , 1 1 9 0 36 , 6 0 7 73 , 1 7 5 37 2 , 9 4 4 83.60%75,339 Ma y o r Ma y o r OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Ma y o r O f f i c e E x p e n s e 2, 6 5 0 0 4 4 2 7 0 2 , 3 8 0 8 9 . 8 2 % 0 Ma y o r C o p i e r E x p e n s e 2, 4 0 0 0 1 5 4 3 1 8 2 , 0 8 2 8 6 . 7 6 % 0 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r F u e l s - G a s 1, 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 4 Ma y o r C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 8 , 3 0 0 0 0 0 8 , 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r V e h i c l e R e p a i r 50 0 0 0 1 8 4 8 2 9 6 . 4 1 % 0 Ma y o r V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 7 7 9 5 . 3 5 % 0 Ma y o r S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 9 5 0 0 2 9 9 (4 ) (1.34)% 560 Ma y o r E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 2 6 3 (2 6 3 ) 0.00% 0 Ma y o r F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 6 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 , 2 5 0 0 0 8 1 , 2 4 2 9 9 . 3 6 % 1 2 9 Ma y o r P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 4 0 0 3 8 7 1 1 6 9 7 0 . 5 2 % 3 9 Ma y o r C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 , 9 8 0 0 2 5 2 3 0 4 1 , 6 7 6 8 4 . 6 2 % 3 5 5 Ma y o r B u s i n e s s M e a l s 3, 3 5 0 0 3 6 9 8 3 , 2 5 3 9 7 . 0 8 % 6 2 Ma y o r M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 9 , 1 7 5 0 2 0 5 2 0 5 8 , 9 7 0 9 7 . 7 6 % 3 5 Ma y o r T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 7 , 7 1 5 0 1 , 2 2 7 1 , 2 2 7 6 , 4 8 8 8 4 . 0 9 % 0 Pa g e 2 3 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 0 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ma y o r T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 8 , 8 7 8 0 5 8 4 5 8 4 8 , 2 9 4 9 3 . 4 1 % 0 Ma y o r T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1 , 8 2 4 0 3 6 7 3 6 7 1 , 4 5 8 7 9 . 9 0 % 0 Ma y o r A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 60 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r B l d g & S t r u c t u r e s R e n t a l & L e a s e 3 5 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 5 7 2 0 4 8 1 7 0 4 0 2 7 0 . 3 6 % 0 Ma y o r H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 75 0 0 0 7 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r V o l u n t e e r A p p r e c i a t i o n e x p e n s e 5 5 0 0 0 0 55 0 100.00%0 Ma y o r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 67 , 0 0 4 0 2, 9 5 4 4, 2 2 3 62 , 7 8 1 93.70%1,240 Ma y o r Ma y o r DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 51 3 , 1 2 3 0 39 , 5 6 2 77 , 3 9 8 43 5 , 7 2 5 84.91%76,579 Ma y o r Ma y o r Tr a n s f e r s Ma y o r P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (7 5 , 8 0 6 ) 0 (6 , 1 2 3 ) (1 2 , 3 1 5 ) (6 3 , 4 9 1 ) 83.75%(12,457) Ma y o r T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (7 5 , 8 0 6 ) 0 (6 , 1 2 3 ) (1 2 , 3 1 5 ) (6 3 , 4 9 1 ) 83.75%(12,457) Ma y o r Ma y o r TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 43 7 , 3 1 7 0 33 , 4 3 8 65 , 0 8 3 37 2 , 2 3 4 85.11%64,122 Ma y o r Pa g e 2 4 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 1 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi n a n c e 1 5 0 0 - F i n a n c e D e p a r t m e n t Fi n a n c e PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Fi n a n c e W a g e s 67 6 , 4 3 7 (4 1 ) 49 , 6 2 4 9 8 , 5 7 9 5 7 7 , 8 1 7 8 5 . 4 2 % 9 5 , 9 8 5 Fi n a n c e O v e r t i m e W a g e s 0 0 0 8 7 (8 7 ) 0.00% 50 Fi n a n c e F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 51 , 7 4 4 0 3 , 6 3 4 7 , 2 2 4 4 4 , 5 2 0 8 6 . 0 3 % 7 , 0 3 1 Fi n a n c e P E R S I 80 , 3 5 4 0 5 , 6 1 7 1 1 , 1 6 9 6 9 , 1 8 5 8 6 . 1 0 % 1 0 , 8 7 1 Fi n a n c e W o r k e r s ' C o m p 4, 6 9 2 0 0 0 4 , 6 9 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 1 6 5 , 3 1 9 0 9, 3 4 8 18 , 6 9 5 14 6 , 6 2 4 88.69%18,429 Fi n a n c e T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 97 8 , 5 4 6 (4 1 ) 68 , 2 2 3 13 5 , 7 5 4 84 2 , 7 5 1 86.13%132,366 Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Fi n a n c e O f f i c e E x p e n s e 5, 4 0 0 0 2 5 0 4 7 7 4 , 9 2 3 9 1 . 1 7 % 3 8 5 Fi n a n c e E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 6 6 0 0 (8 6 ) 86 5 7 4 8 6 . 9 1 % 0 Fi n a n c e S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 3 1 , 7 7 5 0 0 2 5 , 6 1 0 6 , 1 6 5 1 9 . 4 0 % 1 0 , 1 5 8 Fi n a n c e E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 4 5 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 1 , 5 0 0 0 (3 3 0 ) 0 1 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 1 0 , 6 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 6 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e A u d i t & A c c o u n t i n g S e r v i c e s 4 8 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 1 8 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 3 5 9 1 6 , 6 4 1 9 2 . 4 4 % 2 , 7 1 5 Fi n a n c e T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 2 , 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 2 , 5 9 3 9 2 . 6 1 % 3 4 5 Fi n a n c e C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 0 0 3 7 7 4 (7 4 ) 0.00% 88 Fi n a n c e B u s i n e s s M e a l s 64 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 5 Fi n a n c e M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 8 8 8 7 . 9 9 % 8 6 Fi n a n c e E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 4 , 7 1 9 0 0 2 , 3 3 7 1 2 , 3 8 2 8 4 . 1 2 % 2 , 2 4 9 Fi n a n c e T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 3 , 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 4 , 7 5 0 0 0 0 4 , 7 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1 , 8 6 5 0 0 0 1 , 8 6 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e L e g a l N o t i c e s 2, 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 5 , 0 0 0 0 3 8 2 5 1 7 4 , 4 8 3 8 9 . 6 6 % 7 7 6 Fi n a n c e D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 2 , 7 5 1 0 0 6 4 0 2 , 1 1 1 7 6 . 7 3 % 6 4 0 Fi n a n c e H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 16 5 0 0 0 1 6 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 2 0 (2 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 0 0 0 57 (5 7 ) 0.00%0 Fi n a n c e T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 16 5 , 2 4 5 (2 0 ) 26 6 31 , 3 7 6 13 3 , 8 4 9 81.01%17,465 Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Fi n a n c e C I P - M u n i c i p a l C e n t e r 3 3 , 0 0 0 (3 3 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0.00%0 Fi n a n c e T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 33 , 0 0 0 (3 3 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0.00%0 Pa g e 2 5 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 2 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 1 7 6 , 7 9 1 (3 3 , 0 6 1 ) 68 , 4 8 9 16 7 , 1 3 1 97 6 , 5 9 9 85.38%149,832 Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e Tr a n s f e r s Fi n a n c e P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (4 1 7 , 1 9 1 ) 0 (3 4 , 1 1 2 ) ( 6 7 , 8 7 7 ) ( 3 4 9 , 3 1 4 ) 83.72%(66,183) Fi n a n c e O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (1 5 4 , 7 0 4 ) 0 (1 3 3 ) (1 5 , 0 0 9 ) (1 3 9 , 6 9 6 ) 90.29%(6,925) Fi n a n c e T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (5 7 1 , 8 9 5 ) 0 (3 4 , 2 4 4 ) (8 2 , 8 8 6 ) (4 8 9 , 0 1 0 ) 85.51%(73,108) Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 60 4 , 8 9 6 (3 3 , 0 6 1 ) 34 , 2 4 4 84 , 2 4 5 48 7 , 5 9 0 85.26%76,724 Fi n a n c e Pa g e 2 6 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 3 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual IT 1 5 1 0 - I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y IT PE R S O N N E L C O S T S IT W a g e s 99 0 , 3 8 3 (1 1 , 7 7 9 ) 74 , 2 0 7 1 5 1 , 6 7 4 8 2 6 , 9 3 0 8 4 . 5 0 % 1 3 4 , 2 5 6 IT W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 1 9 , 2 0 0 0 1 , 4 9 6 2 , 2 9 1 1 6 , 9 1 0 8 8 . 0 7 % 2 , 3 9 6 IT O v e r t i m e W a g e s 14 , 0 1 2 9 , 9 2 9 1 , 0 2 9 1 , 8 6 4 2 2 , 0 7 6 9 2 . 2 1 % 0 IT F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 78 , 1 6 3 0 5 , 5 1 6 1 1 , 2 1 1 6 6 , 9 5 2 8 5 . 6 5 % 9 , 8 8 8 IT P E R S I 11 9 , 1 5 7 0 8 , 5 1 7 1 7 , 2 0 9 1 0 1 , 9 4 8 8 5 . 5 5 % 1 4 , 8 6 5 IT W o r k e r s ' C o m p 6, 2 5 8 0 0 0 6 , 2 5 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 2 4 0 , 4 6 4 0 16 , 5 9 0 33 , 7 9 3 20 6 , 6 7 1 85.94%30,165 IT T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 , 4 6 7 , 6 3 6 (1 , 8 5 0 ) 10 7 , 3 5 5 21 8 , 0 4 2 1, 2 4 7 , 7 4 5 85.12%191,570 IT IT OP E R A T I N G C O S T S IT O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1, 0 0 0 0 1 9 5 7 9 4 3 9 4 . 3 1 % 2 3 5 IT C o p i e r E x p e n s e 2, 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 , 1 4 0 0 0 8 9 1 , 0 5 1 9 2 . 1 7 % 1 2 5 IT S a f e t y E x p e n s e 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT F u e l s - G a s 70 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 9 IT V e h i c l e R e p a i r 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 2 2 IT V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 8 4 IT S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 9 5 , 6 2 2 0 1 7 , 9 5 0 3 8 , 4 8 4 1 5 7 , 1 3 8 8 0 . 3 2 % 3 3 , 0 9 2 IT E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 5 1 9 , 3 9 5 9 6 . 9 7 % 2 2 , 1 0 9 IT S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 13 4 , 8 6 1 0 5 , 4 5 3 6 , 2 8 9 1 2 8 , 5 7 2 9 5 . 3 3 % 1 , 8 9 2 IT F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 6 , 1 5 0 0 0 0 6 , 1 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 , 8 3 4 IT C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 8 , 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 2 5 , 0 0 0 (5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 1 7 , 3 0 0 0 1 , 2 7 4 2 , 5 4 6 1 4 , 7 5 4 8 5 . 2 8 % 2 , 5 2 4 IT P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 1 , 6 8 0 0 1 3 4 2 9 7 1 , 3 8 3 8 2 . 3 0 % 3 8 2 IT C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 4 , 4 0 0 0 2 1 8 4 7 6 3 , 9 2 4 8 9 . 1 8 % 5 1 6 IT B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 7 5 0 0 3 2 4 4 5 8 . 0 0 % 0 IT E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 4 , 5 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 4 3 , 8 5 0 9 8 . 5 3 % 6 0 0 IT T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 8 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 5 , 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2 , 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 28 5 0 0 0 2 8 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa g e 2 7 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 4 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual IT M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 1 0 (1 0 ) 0 0 0 0.00%0 IT T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 48 1 , 5 2 3 (5 , 0 1 0 ) 25 , 0 4 8 49 , 5 2 4 42 6 , 9 8 9 89.61%70,073 IT IT Ca p i t a l O u t l a y IT C a p i t a l - C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 100.00%0 IT T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 40 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 100.00%0 IT IT DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 2, 3 4 9 , 1 5 9 (6 , 8 6 0 ) 13 2 , 4 0 3 26 7 , 5 6 6 2, 0 7 4 , 7 3 3 88.57%261,643 IT IT Tr a n s f e r s IT P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (7 3 3 , 8 1 9 ) 0 (5 3 , 6 7 8 ) ( 1 0 9 , 0 2 1 ) ( 6 2 4 , 7 9 8 ) 85.14%(95,785) IT O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (4 1 7 , 5 6 2 ) 0 (1 2 , 5 2 4 ) (2 4 , 7 6 2 ) (3 9 2 , 8 0 0 ) 94.06%(31,915) IT T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (1 , 1 5 1 , 3 8 1 ) 0 (6 6 , 2 0 2 ) (1 3 3 , 7 8 3 ) (1 , 0 1 7 , 5 9 8 ) 88.38%(127,700) IT IT TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 1 9 7 , 7 7 8 (6 , 8 6 0 ) 66 , 2 0 2 13 3 , 7 8 3 1, 0 5 7 , 1 3 5 88.76%133,942 Pa g e 2 8 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 5 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Le g a l 1 5 2 0 - L e g a l D e p t Le g a l PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Le g a l W a g e s 51 4 , 3 3 4 0 4 4 , 0 7 8 8 5 , 2 8 5 4 2 9 , 0 4 9 8 3 . 4 1 % 8 3 , 2 9 8 Le g a l F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 39 , 3 4 7 0 3 , 2 2 7 6 , 2 3 4 3 3 , 1 1 3 8 4 . 1 5 % 6 , 0 7 1 Le g a l P E R S I 61 , 3 8 0 0 4 , 9 9 0 9 , 6 5 4 5 1 , 7 2 6 8 4 . 2 7 % 9 , 4 2 9 Le g a l W o r k e r s ' C o m p 1, 0 1 9 0 0 0 1 , 0 1 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 7 5 , 1 4 5 0 5, 1 9 0 10 , 3 8 1 64 , 7 6 4 86.18%11,692 Le g a l T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 69 1 , 2 2 5 0 57 , 4 8 4 11 1 , 5 5 4 57 9 , 6 7 0 83.86%110,490 Le g a l Le g a l OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Le g a l O f f i c e E x p e n s e 2, 5 0 0 0 1 4 4 1 4 4 2 , 3 5 6 9 4 . 2 5 % 2 6 8 Le g a l E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % (2) Le g a l S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 , 1 8 0 0 0 1 , 1 9 6 (1 6 ) (1.33)% 840 Le g a l E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2 , 9 5 0 0 0 0 2 , 9 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 3 5 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l L e g a l S e r v i c e s 80 , 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 7 2 0 7 9 , 2 8 0 9 9 . 0 9 % 3 6 , 6 7 8 Le g a l P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 5 0 0 0 5 1 4 6 9 7 . 0 0 % 4 Le g a l P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 4 8 0 0 1 9 3 8 4 4 2 9 2 . 1 5 % 4 1 Le g a l C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 , 0 0 8 0 8 4 1 6 8 8 4 0 8 3 . 3 3 % 1 6 8 Le g a l B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 9 Le g a l M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 9 0 8 9 . 9 9 % 3 5 Le g a l E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 3 , 1 7 0 7 9 . 2 4 % 6 3 4 Le g a l T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 9 5 9 4 1 4 . 0 9 % 0 Le g a l T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 8 1 6 2 1 6 . 1 6 % 0 Le g a l T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 50 0 0 0 5 6 7 (6 6 ) (13.29)% 0 Le g a l P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 15 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 1 0 , 1 6 2 0 9 3 1 9 3 1 9 , 2 3 1 9 0 . 8 3 % 1 , 4 2 5 Le g a l H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 75 0 0 0 75 100.00%0 Le g a l T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 14 2 , 1 5 5 0 1, 9 0 0 6, 4 0 5 13 5 , 7 5 0 95.49%40,110 Le g a l Le g a l Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Le g a l C I P - M u n i c i p a l C e n t e r 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 100.00%0 Le g a l T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 10 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 100.00%0 Le g a l Le g a l DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 93 3 , 3 8 0 0 59 , 3 8 5 11 7 , 9 5 9 81 5 , 4 2 1 87.36%150,600 Le g a l Le g a l Tr a n s f e r s Pa g e 2 9 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 6 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Le g a l P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (3 4 5 , 6 1 2 ) 0 (2 8 , 7 4 2 ) ( 5 5 , 7 7 7 ) ( 2 8 9 , 8 3 5 ) 83.86%(55,245) Le g a l O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (7 1 , 0 7 8 ) 0 (9 5 0 ) ( 3 , 2 0 2 ) ( 6 7 , 8 7 5 ) 95.49%(1,171) Le g a l Le g a l T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (4 1 6 , 6 9 0 ) 0 (2 9 , 6 9 2 ) (5 8 , 9 8 0 ) (3 5 7 , 7 1 1 ) 85.85%(56,416) Le g a l Le g a l TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 51 6 , 6 9 0 0 29 , 6 9 2 58 , 9 8 0 45 7 , 7 1 0 88.58%94,184 Le g a l Pa g e 3 0 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 7 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual HR 1 5 4 0 - H u m a n R e s o u r c e s HR RE V E N U E S HR R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 10 10 (1 0 ) 0.00%0 HR T o t a l R E V E N U E S 0 0 10 10 (1 0 ) 0.00%0 HR PE R S O N N E L C O S T S HR W a g e s 27 0 , 4 5 4 0 2 2 , 8 6 4 4 3 , 4 4 3 2 2 7 , 0 1 1 8 3 . 9 3 % 4 2 , 4 4 1 HR W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR O v e r t i m e W a g e s 0 0 7 3 7 3 (7 3 ) 0.00% 0 HR F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 22 , 2 1 9 0 1 , 6 4 8 3 , 1 1 1 1 9 , 1 0 8 8 5 . 9 9 % 3 , 0 7 5 HR P E R S I 31 , 9 6 2 0 2 , 5 9 7 4 , 9 2 6 2 7 , 0 3 6 8 4 . 5 8 % 4 , 8 0 4 HR W o r k e r s ' C o m p 81 2 0 0 0 8 1 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 1 4 0 , 1 4 5 0 13 , 6 8 3 20 , 3 8 0 11 9 , 7 6 6 85.45%20,921 HR T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 48 5 , 5 9 3 0 40 , 8 6 5 71 , 9 3 3 41 3 , 6 6 0 85.19%71,241 HR HR OP E R A T I N G C O S T S HR O f f i c e E x p e n s e 4, 5 0 0 0 2 6 7 9 5 7 3 , 5 4 3 7 8 . 7 3 % 8 7 2 HR C o p i e r E x p e n s e 7, 9 2 6 0 5 3 1 9 6 3 6 , 9 6 3 8 7 . 8 4 % 1 , 1 8 9 HR E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 3 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 2 5 0 8 3 . 4 1 % (3) HR S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 9 , 8 6 0 0 0 1 3 , 9 8 3 5 , 8 7 7 2 9 . 5 9 % 1 3 , 4 5 7 HR E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 0 0 0 5 2 5 2 4 4 8 8 9 . 6 0 % 2 8 HR F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2 , 3 5 0 0 0 0 2 , 3 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 7 4 , 6 5 0 0 0 0 7 4 , 6 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 0 0 0 HR B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 1 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 3 7 5 1 1 , 1 2 5 9 6 . 7 4 % 2 7 9 HR P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 4 0 0 0 1 6 4 0 3 6 0 8 9 . 9 7 % 4 7 HR C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 , 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 , 5 8 0 8 7 . 7 7 % 2 2 0 HR B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 HR M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 8 8 8 7 . 9 9 % 1 2 HR E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 0 , 2 1 0 0 0 3 7 5 9 , 8 3 5 9 6 . 3 2 % 8 1 9 HR C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 6 5 , 6 2 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 4 , 5 2 0 6 6 , 1 0 1 9 3 . 5 9 % 1 1 HR W e l l n e s s P r o g r a m 1 7 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 4 2 0 2 , 2 7 0 1 4 , 7 3 0 8 6 . 6 4 % 1 , 3 4 4 HR A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 1 4 , 0 0 0 0 4 , 5 5 5 4 , 5 5 5 9 , 4 4 5 6 7 . 4 6 % 7 , 7 3 9 HR P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 0 HR D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 8 , 6 1 3 0 0 2 , 5 9 8 6 , 0 1 5 6 9 . 8 3 % 3 8 0 HR H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 75 0 0 0 7 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR S u s p e n s e ( n o r e c e i p t s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 6 1 HR E m p l o y e e E d u c a t i o n R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 2 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 1 , 0 0 0 9 1 . 6 6 % 0 HR E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 5 , 5 0 0 0 94 94 5, 4 0 6 98.28%36 HR T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 25 8 , 5 0 5 5, 0 0 0 8, 1 0 7 32 , 0 6 5 23 1 , 4 4 0 87.83%28,780 Pa g e 3 1 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 8 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual HR HR DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 74 4 , 0 9 8 5, 0 0 0 48 , 9 7 2 10 3 , 9 9 8 64 5 , 1 0 0 86.11%100,021 HR HR Tr a n s f e r s HR P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (2 0 8 , 7 7 8 ) 0 (2 0 , 4 3 3 ) ( 3 5 , 9 6 6 ) ( 1 7 2 , 8 1 2 ) 82.77%(35,620) HR O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (1 2 0 , 7 7 1 ) 0 (4 , 0 5 4 ) (1 6 , 0 3 3 ) (1 0 4 , 7 3 9 ) 86.72%(14,265) HR T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (3 2 9 , 5 5 0 ) 0 (2 4 , 4 8 6 ) (5 1 , 9 9 9 ) (2 7 7 , 5 5 1 ) 84.22%(49,885) HR HR TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 41 4 , 5 4 9 5, 0 0 0 24 , 4 8 6 51 , 9 9 9 36 7 , 5 5 0 87.60%50,135 HR Pa g e 3 2 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 4 9 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ot h G o v 1 8 4 0 - O t h e r G o v t / S t L i g h t i n g Ot h G o v RE V E N U E S Ot h G o v G e n e r a l P r o p e r t y T a x R e v e n u e 3 0 , 8 0 8 , 0 6 4 0 1 3 , 7 1 5 5 8 , 3 9 4 3 0 , 7 4 9 , 6 7 0 9 9 . 8 1 % 6 6 , 1 6 8 Ot h G o v G a s F r a n c h i s e R e v e n u e 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v C a b l e T V F r a n c h i s e R e v e n u e 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v E l e c t r i c i t y F r a n c h i s e R e v e n u e 5 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 2 7 Ot h G o v S t a t e R e v e n u e S h a r i n g R e v e n u e 5 , 9 8 2 , 7 4 1 0 0 0 5 , 9 8 2 , 7 4 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v S t a t e L i q u o r A p p o r t i o n m e n t R e v e n u e 8 3 4 , 9 6 0 0 0 0 8 3 4 , 9 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 7 Ot h G o v R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 , 3 3 5 Ot h G o v M A C A r t s C o m m i s s i o n R e v e n u e s 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 5 3 5 9 , 9 6 5 9 9 . 6 4 % 0 Ot h G o v I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 1 2 7 , 0 0 0 0 0 45 , 9 6 4 81 , 0 3 6 63.80%54,908 Ot h G o v T o t a l R E V E N U E S 39 , 0 7 2 , 7 6 5 0 13 , 7 5 0 10 4 , 3 9 4 38 , 9 6 8 , 3 7 1 99.73%124,624 Ot h G o v PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Ot h G o v W a g e s 14 6 , 3 0 4 0 8 , 8 9 1 1 8 , 6 1 4 1 2 7 , 6 9 1 8 7 . 2 7 % 2 3 , 3 3 6 Ot h G o v W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 6 , 0 0 0 0 3 3 6 7 2 2 5 , 2 7 8 8 7 . 9 6 % 7 4 8 Ot h G o v F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 11 , 6 5 1 0 6 7 8 1 , 4 2 4 1 0 , 2 2 7 8 7 . 7 7 % 1 , 7 8 0 Ot h G o v P E R S I 17 , 4 6 9 0 1 , 0 0 6 2 , 1 0 7 1 5 , 3 6 2 8 7 . 9 3 % 2 , 6 4 2 Ot h G o v W o r k e r s ' C o m p 3, 1 5 9 0 0 0 3 , 1 5 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 3 0 , 0 5 8 0 2, 3 5 0 4, 7 0 1 25 , 3 5 7 84.36%4,694 Ot h G o v T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 21 4 , 6 4 1 0 13 , 2 6 2 27 , 5 6 8 18 7 , 0 7 3 87.16%33,200 Ot h G o v OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Ot h G o v O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1, 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v C o p i e r E x p e n s e 7, 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 4 7 0 5 , 5 3 0 7 8 . 9 9 % 0 Ot h G o v E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 8 0 0 4 4 1 7 6 9 7 . 9 0 % 9 3 Ot h G o v B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 1 9 , 4 5 0 0 6 0 6 0 1 9 , 3 9 0 9 9 . 6 9 % 1 6 2 Ot h G o v P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 2 , 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v S t r e e t L i g h t / S i g n s R e p a i r s / M a i n t e n a n c e 30 , 0 0 0 0 3 , 8 4 5 6 , 3 8 2 2 3 , 6 1 8 7 8 . 7 2 % 5 , 4 4 6 Ot h G o v G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 4 1 5 9 0 0 0 3 7 4 9 4 1 7 1 . 5 6 % 3 4 4 Ot h G o v A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 1 , 2 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 1 , 1 1 0 9 2 . 4 8 % 0 Ot h G o v H i s t o r i c a l P r e s e r v a t i o n 1 6 , 0 2 5 0 1 6 3 3 1 5 , 9 9 2 9 9 . 7 9 % 3 1 7 Ot h G o v M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 2 5 , 5 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 , 2 7 8 9 9 . 1 2 % 0 Ot h G o v T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S e r v i c e s 1 9 4 , 9 3 8 0 0 0 1 9 4 , 9 3 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 6 0 , 1 9 4 Ot h G o v S e n i o r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % (4,896) Ot h G o v A l l u m b a u g h H o u s e 6 2 , 4 1 9 0 1 4 , 3 6 5 1 4 , 3 6 5 4 8 , 0 5 4 7 6 . 9 8 % 1 4 , 3 6 5 Ot h G o v E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 2 6 4 , 6 3 9 0 1 5 , 9 3 2 1 6 , 5 0 9 2 4 8 , 1 3 0 9 3 . 7 6 % 3 , 9 3 8 Ot h G o v E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa g e 3 3 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 0 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ot h G o v P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 3 7 , 7 3 0 0 0 0 3 7 , 7 3 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v A r t s C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e s 2 2 , 4 5 0 0 4 , 0 9 5 6 , 4 3 3 1 6 , 0 1 7 7 1 . 3 4 % 1 , 3 3 4 Ot h G o v T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 0 0 6 9 1 3 7 (1 3 7 ) 0.00% 121 Ot h G o v P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 6 , 0 0 0 0 3 6 5 7 1 3 5 , 2 8 7 8 8 . 1 2 % 2 9 6 Ot h G o v P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 60 0 0 4 6 1 0 4 4 9 6 8 2 . 6 1 % 1 3 1 Ot h G o v B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 2 , 1 2 5 0 0 0 2 , 1 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 6 5 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 85 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 40 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 1 2 , 0 0 0 0 5 3 1 7 5 1 1 , 8 2 5 9 8 . 5 3 % 6 , 4 4 4 Ot h G o v P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 25 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 0 0 (1 3 , 2 1 9 ) ( 9 , 5 3 1 ) 9, 5 3 1 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 3 2 5 , 6 0 0 0 2 8 , 1 1 8 5 4 , 8 9 2 2 7 0 , 7 0 8 8 3 . 1 4 % 5 1 , 0 3 4 Ot h G o v D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 7 0 , 0 9 7 (9 0 0 ) 0 4 2 , 7 9 9 2 6 , 3 9 9 3 8 . 1 4 % 4 2 , 2 8 0 Ot h G o v I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 40 0 0 0 3 6 7 3 3 8 . 1 8 % 1 6 3 Ot h G o v A D A C o m p l i a n c e 10 , 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 1 5 0 9 , 8 5 0 9 8 . 4 9 % 0 Ot h G o v H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 45 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 4 , 3 6 0 2 2 9 0 0 4 , 5 8 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 3 Ot h G o v V o l u n t e e r A p p r e c i a t i o n e x p e n s e 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v G r a n t E x p e n d i t u r e s 0 0 8, 9 5 8 8, 9 5 8 (8 , 9 5 8 ) 0.00%0 Ot h G o v T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1 , 1 3 9 , 0 8 3 22 9 63 , 1 0 9 14 4 , 7 0 7 99 4 , 6 0 6 87.30%281,809 Ot h G o v Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Ot h G o v C a p i t a l - S i g n s / A r t 1 4 3 , 4 3 8 0 0 0 14 3 , 4 3 8 100.00%0 Ot h G o v T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 14 3 , 4 3 8 0 0 0 14 3 , 4 3 8 100.00%0 Ot h G o v DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 4 9 7 , 1 6 3 22 9 76 , 3 7 1 17 2 , 2 7 5 1, 3 2 5 , 1 1 7 88.49%315,009 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v Tr a n s f e r s Ot h G o v P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (1 0 7 , 3 2 1 ) 0 (6 , 6 3 1 ) (1 3 , 7 8 4 ) (9 3 , 5 3 6 ) 87.15%(16,195) Ot h G o v T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (1 0 7 , 3 2 1 ) 0 (6 , 6 3 1 ) (1 3 , 7 8 4 ) (9 3 , 5 3 6 ) 87.16%(16,195) Ot h G o v Ot h G o v In t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s Ot h G o v O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r I n (4 0 6 , 4 6 9 ) 28 0 , 9 7 0 0 0 (1 2 5 , 4 9 9 ) 100.00% 0 Ot h G o v T r a n s f e r o f E q u i t y 4 0 6 , 4 6 9 0 0 0 40 6 , 4 6 9 100.00%0 Ot h G o v T o t a l I n t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s 0 28 0 , 9 7 0 0 0 28 0 , 9 7 0 100.00%0 Ot h G o v TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 3 8 9 , 8 4 2 28 1 , 1 9 9 69 , 7 4 0 15 8 , 4 9 1 1, 5 1 2 , 5 5 1 90.51%298,814 Pa g e 3 4 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 1 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ci t y H a l l 1 8 5 0 - C i t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l RE V E N U E S Ci t y H a l l R e n t a l I n c o m e 19 , 0 0 0 0 1, 6 8 1 3, 3 6 2 15 , 6 3 8 82.30%3,322 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l R E V E N U E S 19 , 0 0 0 0 1, 6 8 1 3, 3 6 2 15 , 6 3 8 82.31%3,322 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Ci t y H a l l W a g e s 14 8 , 9 9 5 0 3 , 8 6 2 7 , 7 3 7 1 4 1 , 2 5 8 9 4 . 8 0 % 1 6 , 8 5 2 Ci t y H a l l O v e r t i m e W a g e s 45 2 0 1 9 7 6 3 4 (1 8 2 ) (40.15)% 0 Ci t y H a l l F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 11 , 4 3 3 0 3 1 1 6 4 0 1 0 , 7 9 3 9 4 . 3 9 % 1 , 2 2 7 Ci t y H a l l P E R S I 17 , 8 4 4 0 4 5 9 9 4 8 1 6 , 8 9 7 9 4 . 6 8 % 1 , 9 0 8 Ci t y H a l l W o r k e r s ' C o m p 4, 9 5 7 0 0 0 4 , 9 5 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 4 5 , 4 4 7 0 62 5 1, 2 5 0 44 , 1 9 7 97.24%3,941 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 22 9 , 1 2 8 0 5, 4 5 4 11 , 2 0 9 21 7 , 9 1 9 95.11%23,927 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Ci t y H a l l O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1, 2 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 , 1 7 4 9 7 . 8 1 % 0 Ci t y H a l l E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 8 0 0 4 4 1 7 6 9 7 . 9 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l J a n i t o r i a l 12 9 , 7 0 3 0 7 , 8 5 4 1 9 , 0 7 7 1 1 0 , 6 2 6 8 5 . 2 9 % 9 , 6 0 0 Ci t y H a l l S a f e t y E x p e n s e 35 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 Ci t y H a l l S h o p S u p p l i e s 2, 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 1 8 Ci t y H a l l F u e l s - G a s 1, 0 0 0 0 6 1 9 7 9 0 3 9 0 . 3 0 % 6 3 Ci t y H a l l C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 0 0 3 7 3 7 (3 7 ) 0.00% 109 Ci t y H a l l B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 1 5 6 , 7 5 7 0 8 , 9 4 3 1 2 , 8 3 0 1 4 3 , 9 2 7 9 1 . 8 1 % 5 , 7 8 1 Ci t y H a l l P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 1 0 , 9 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 9 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 , 9 7 0 Ci t y H a l l V e h i c l e R e p a i r 2, 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 , 0 0 0 0 6 3 3 6 3 3 1 , 3 6 7 6 8 . 3 5 % 1 2 Ci t y H a l l E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 5 Ci t y H a l l A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 1 7 , 1 7 7 0 6 7 6 5 7 1 6 , 5 2 1 9 6 . 1 7 % 0 Ci t y H a l l E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 2 8 Ci t y H a l l E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 2 6 3 (2 6 3 ) 0.00% 0 Ci t y H a l l F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 , 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 3 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l A r t s C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e s 5 , 0 6 6 0 0 0 5 , 0 6 6 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 1 , 9 3 5 0 1 7 4 3 4 8 1 , 5 8 7 8 2 . 0 0 % 3 1 6 Ci t y H a l l P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 3 , 8 6 9 0 8 9 2 8 9 2 2 , 9 7 7 7 6 . 9 3 % 0 Ci t y H a l l P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 7 2 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 0 Ci t y H a l l C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 2 , 0 5 0 0 2 5 7 7 1 , 9 7 3 9 6 . 2 2 % 2 0 3 Pa g e 3 5 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 2 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ci t y H a l l E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 2 , 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 2 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 2 2 , 3 9 8 0 0 9 , 8 9 9 1 2 , 4 9 9 5 5 . 8 0 % 9 , 5 2 3 Ci t y H a l l E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 9 6 , 6 6 3 0 6 , 9 6 4 1 4 , 7 9 5 8 1 , 8 6 8 8 4 . 6 9 % 1 4 , 1 0 5 Ci t y H a l l I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 7 2 7 1 , 2 7 9 1 3 , 7 2 1 9 1 . 4 7 % 1 , 4 3 0 Ci t y H a l l B l d g & S t r u c t u r e s R e n t a l & L e a s e 2 0 , 9 2 1 0 1 , 7 4 3 3 , 4 3 6 1 7 , 4 8 5 8 3 . 5 7 % 3 , 3 3 6 Ci t y H a l l D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 3 5 5 0 0 0 3 5 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 40 0 0 0 1 5 3 2 4 7 6 1 . 8 4 % 3 4 6 Ci t y H a l l H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 45 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 1 0 (1 0 ) 0 0 0 0.00%0 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 50 8 , 4 5 9 (1 0 ) 28 , 1 2 4 64 , 5 0 4 44 3 , 9 4 6 87.31%51,220 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Ci t y H a l l I m p r o v e m e n t - p a v e m e n t s i d e w a l k s 2 7 , 2 0 8 0 0 0 2 7 , 2 0 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l C I P - M u n i c i p a l C e n t e r 3 0 0 , 5 4 2 33 , 0 0 0 0 0 33 3 , 5 4 2 100.00%0 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 32 7 , 7 5 0 33 , 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 , 7 5 0 100.00%0 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 0 6 5 , 3 3 7 32 , 9 9 0 33 , 5 7 8 75 , 7 1 3 1, 0 2 2 , 6 1 4 93.10%75,147 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l Tr a n s f e r s Ci t y H a l l P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (9 3 , 2 1 0 ) 0 (3 , 1 3 2 ) ( 6 , 4 3 6 ) ( 8 6 , 7 7 4 ) 93.09%(13,739) Ci t y H a l l O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (2 9 1 , 1 1 7 ) 0 (1 6 , 1 4 9 ) (3 7 , 0 3 8 ) (2 5 4 , 0 7 9 ) 87.27%(29,277) Ci t y H a l l T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (3 8 4 , 3 2 7 ) 0 (1 9 , 2 8 1 ) (4 3 , 4 7 4 ) (3 4 0 , 8 5 3 ) 88.69%(43,016) Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 68 1 , 0 1 0 32 , 9 9 0 14 , 2 9 8 32 , 2 3 9 68 1 , 7 6 1 95.48%32,131 Ci t y H a l l Pa g e 3 6 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 3 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co m D e v 1 9 1 0 - C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p t s Co m D e v RE V E N U E S Co m D e v B l d g P e r m i t s - R e s i d e n t i a l R e v e n u e 2 , 5 6 6 , 1 4 7 0 1 9 3 , 2 6 1 4 2 9 , 3 3 6 2 , 1 3 6 , 8 1 1 8 3 . 2 6 % 3 0 6 , 1 1 7 Co m D e v P l u m b i n g P e r m i t R e v e n u e s 3 1 8 , 5 0 0 0 5 9 , 2 1 3 1 1 0 , 2 9 4 2 0 8 , 2 0 6 6 5 . 3 7 % 8 6 , 4 5 0 Co m D e v M e c h a n i c a l P e r m i t R e v e n u e s 4 4 1 , 0 0 0 0 6 3 , 7 9 9 1 1 9 , 9 9 8 3 2 1 , 0 0 2 7 2 . 7 8 % 9 7 , 3 4 9 Co m D e v E l e c t r i c a l P e r m i t R e v e n u e s 2 4 5 , 0 0 0 0 3 2 , 6 6 9 7 4 , 2 6 0 1 7 0 , 7 4 0 6 9 . 6 8 % 6 9 , 5 9 7 Co m D e v F i r e I n s p e c t i o n & P e r m i t F e e s 2 9 4 , 0 0 0 0 4 1 , 9 0 0 8 9 , 7 4 6 2 0 4 , 2 5 4 6 9 . 4 7 % 7 2 , 2 0 0 Co m D e v B l d g P e r m i t s - M u l t i f a m i l y R e v e n u e 8 4 , 9 1 3 0 5 1 , 0 1 2 1 6 9 , 9 2 6 (8 5 , 0 1 3 ) (100.11)% 106,780 Co m D e v B l d g P e r m i t s - C o m m e r c i a l R e v e n u e 8 3 3 , 0 0 0 0 9 4 , 6 2 8 1 5 1 , 2 1 5 6 8 1 , 7 8 5 8 1 . 8 4 % 1 9 1 , 1 8 1 Co m D e v F l o o d P l a i n P e r m i t R e v e n u e 0 0 0 5 0 (5 0 ) 0.00% 75 Co m D e v F i l i n g F e e s - R e v e n u e s 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 2 , 8 3 4 6 9 , 7 5 0 1 3 0 , 2 5 0 6 5 . 1 2 % 3 4 , 1 5 1 Co m D e v M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 40 40 (4 0 ) 0.00%100 Co m D e v T o t a l R E V E N U E S 4, 9 8 2 , 5 6 0 0 58 9 , 3 5 5 1, 2 1 4 , 6 1 6 3, 7 6 7 , 9 4 4 75.62%964,000 Co m D e v Co m D e v PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Co m D e v W a g e s 1, 0 8 0 , 4 6 8 0 7 4 , 6 2 9 1 4 2 , 2 3 7 9 3 8 , 2 3 1 8 6 . 8 3 % 1 5 1 , 2 8 4 Co m D e v W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 0 0 2 , 1 1 6 5 , 0 7 8 (5 , 0 7 8 ) 0.00% 4,291 Co m D e v O v e r t i m e W a g e s 33 2 0 0 0 3 3 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 82 , 6 8 1 0 5 , 6 2 0 1 0 , 7 9 1 7 1 , 8 9 0 8 6 . 9 4 % 1 1 , 4 6 0 Co m D e v P E R S I 12 8 , 1 5 1 0 8 , 6 8 8 1 6 , 6 7 6 1 1 1 , 4 7 5 8 6 . 9 8 % 1 7 , 6 1 1 Co m D e v W o r k e r s ' C o m p 6, 1 3 6 0 0 0 6 , 1 3 6 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 2 4 0 , 6 4 4 0 15 , 6 5 1 29 , 4 3 8 21 1 , 2 0 6 87.76%28,321 Co m D e v T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 , 5 3 8 , 4 1 3 0 10 6 , 7 0 5 20 4 , 2 2 0 1, 3 3 4 , 1 9 4 86.73%212,966 Co m D e v Co m D e v OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Co m D e v O f f i c e E x p e n s e 3, 5 0 0 0 3 4 5 6 9 7 2 , 8 0 4 8 0 . 0 9 % (70) Co m D e v C o p i e r E x p e n s e 8, 0 5 6 0 6 3 4 1 , 1 9 2 6 , 8 6 4 8 5 . 2 0 % 8 7 7 Co m D e v E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 , 9 8 0 0 0 0 1 , 9 8 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v F u e l s - G a s 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v V e h i c l e R e p a i r 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 8 0 9 6 . 0 2 % 0 Co m D e v S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 3 , 8 0 5 0 0 1 8 , 3 8 1 5 , 4 2 4 2 2 . 7 8 % 1 6 , 6 0 8 Co m D e v E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 2 , 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 , 9 7 8 9 8 . 8 8 % 0 Co m D e v S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 33 0 0 0 5 2 6 (1 9 6 ) (59.46)% 0 Co m D e v F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 , 8 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 2 4 Co m D e v C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 9 , 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 , 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 1 2 , 0 0 0 8 0 . 0 0 % 6 5 0 Co m D e v C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 4 3 , 5 0 0 0 1 , 7 6 7 5 , 4 5 0 3 8 , 0 5 0 8 7 . 4 7 % 5 9 8 Co m D e v B u i l d i n g I n s p e c t i o n s 9 1 5 , 6 3 7 0 7 1 , 7 1 0 1 7 2 , 3 8 8 7 4 3 , 2 4 9 8 1 . 1 7 % 1 3 8 , 6 9 7 Pa g e 3 7 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 4 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co m D e v M e c h a n i c a l I n s p e c t i o n s 2 8 6 , 6 5 0 0 3 8 , 2 8 0 7 1 , 9 9 9 2 1 4 , 6 5 1 7 4 . 8 8 % 5 8 , 4 0 9 Co m D e v E l e c t r i c a l I n s p e c t i o n s 1 5 9 , 2 5 0 0 2 3 , 4 8 1 5 2 , 5 9 5 1 0 6 , 6 5 5 6 6 . 9 7 % 4 8 , 8 4 0 Co m D e v P l u m b i n g I n s p e c t i o n s 1 9 1 , 1 0 0 0 3 5 , 5 2 8 6 6 , 1 7 7 1 2 4 , 9 2 3 6 5 . 3 7 % 5 1 , 9 2 9 Co m D e v F i r e I n s p e c t i o n s 4 1 5 , 6 4 3 0 3 0 , 5 8 7 6 5 , 6 1 2 3 5 0 , 0 3 1 8 4 . 2 1 % 5 2 , 7 0 6 Co m D e v P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 6 0 0 0 0 3 8 5 6 2 9 3 . 6 1 % 5 1 Co m D e v P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 5 , 4 0 0 0 4 1 0 8 1 7 4 , 5 8 3 8 4 . 8 7 % 9 0 3 Co m D e v C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 3 , 2 4 0 0 1 6 1 3 2 2 2 , 9 1 8 9 0 . 0 4 % 4 7 6 Co m D e v B u s i n e s s M e a l s 1, 2 2 0 0 4 6 9 9 1 , 1 2 1 9 1 . 8 6 % 7 8 3 Co m D e v M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 5 1 0 9 0 8 9 . 9 9 % 2 8 Co m D e v E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 3 , 3 9 5 0 0 2 3 9 1 3 , 1 5 6 9 8 . 2 1 % 5 2 5 Co m D e v T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 7 , 9 3 5 0 0 0 7 , 9 3 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 0 , 8 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 8 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 3 , 8 3 0 0 0 0 3 , 8 3 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 1 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v L e g a l N o t i c e s 12 , 0 0 0 0 2 2 9 9 9 5 1 1 , 0 0 5 9 1 . 7 0 % 7 4 3 Co m D e v P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 7 , 0 0 0 0 4 6 2 5 9 6 , 7 4 1 9 6 . 3 0 % 9 Co m D e v D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 2 0 , 6 1 7 0 2 6 8 2 , 2 7 7 1 8 , 3 4 0 8 8 . 9 5 % 1 , 7 2 7 Co m D e v C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 46 5 0 0 0 4 6 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v M e r i d i a n D e v e l o p m e n t 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 1 0 (1 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % (10) Co m D e v G r a n t E x p e n d i t u r e s 0 0 67 67 (6 7 ) 0.00%215 Co m D e v T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2 , 2 5 4 , 7 6 3 (1 0 ) 20 5 , 0 6 3 46 3 , 1 8 1 1, 7 9 1 , 5 7 2 79.46%375,318 Co m D e v Co m D e v DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 3, 7 9 3 , 1 7 6 (1 0 ) 31 1 , 7 6 8 66 7 , 4 0 1 3, 1 2 5 , 7 6 5 82.40%588,284 Co m D e v Co m D e v Tr a n s f e r s Co m D e v P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (5 9 , 4 5 1 ) 0 (4 , 9 1 7 ) ( 9 , 7 9 0 ) ( 4 9 , 6 6 1 ) 83.53%(9,290) Co m D e v P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 4 8 , 4 6 2 0 2 , 9 0 0 5 , 9 1 3 4 2 , 5 4 9 8 7 . 7 9 % 7 , 8 4 8 Co m D e v O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 6 5 , 5 0 4 0 3, 6 3 4 8, 3 3 4 57 , 1 7 0 87.27%6,588 Co m D e v T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 54 , 5 1 5 0 1, 6 1 7 4, 4 5 7 50 , 0 5 8 91.82%5,146 Co m D e v Co m D e v TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 3, 8 4 7 , 6 9 1 (1 0 ) 31 3 , 3 8 5 67 1 , 8 5 8 3, 1 7 5 , 8 2 4 82.53%593,430 Co m D e v Pa g e 3 8 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 5 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Po l i c e 2 1 1 0 - P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t Po l i c e RE V E N U E S Po l i c e D o g L i c e n s e R e v e n u e s 4 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 4 9 2 , 3 6 2 4 2 , 6 3 9 9 4 . 7 5 % 4 , 1 8 3 Po l i c e F a l s e A l a r m F e e s 2 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 3 3 5 4 , 7 6 5 (2 , 7 6 5 ) (138.24)% 6,285 Po l i c e G r a n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % (6,744) Po l i c e R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 9 , 8 8 7 1 0 , 0 6 0 (1 0 , 0 6 0 ) 0.00% 7,910 Po l i c e C o u r t R e v e n u e 35 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 7 , 8 6 5 3 7 , 8 6 5 3 1 2 , 1 3 5 8 9 . 1 8 % 2 6 , 4 8 7 Po l i c e R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 5 1 5 8 3 1 (8 3 1 ) 0.00% 420 Po l i c e S t a t e D r u g S e i z u r e R e v e n u e 0 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 (2 , 1 0 0 ) 0.00% 422 Po l i c e S c h o o l R e s o u r c e R e v e n u e 4 2 3 , 5 1 6 0 0 1 , 9 7 4 4 2 1 , 5 4 2 9 9 . 5 3 % 1 , 7 6 6 Po l i c e R e n t a l I n c o m e 3, 0 0 0 0 5 0 9 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 7 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 5 2 5 Po l i c e I m p a c t R e v - M u l t i f a m i l y 0 0 1 0 , 3 1 5 2 9 , 8 5 8 (2 9 , 8 5 8 ) 0.00% 18,729 Po l i c e I m p a c t R e v - C o m m e r c i a l 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 2 4 , 4 9 0 1 5 , 5 1 0 7 7 . 5 5 % 1 6 , 6 5 5 Po l i c e I m p a c t R e v - R e s i d e n t i a l 1 7 6 , 4 3 6 0 1 7 , 9 1 5 4 0 , 1 7 3 1 3 6 , 2 6 3 7 7 . 2 3 % 2 9 , 4 2 6 Po l i c e D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 0 1 , 1 4 5 1 , 1 4 5 (1 , 1 4 5 ) 0.00% 4,181 Po l i c e M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 7 8 8 7 8 8 (7 8 8 ) 0.00% 37 Po l i c e F i n e s , F o r f e i t R e v e n u e s 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 5 1 , 9 7 5 3 , 0 2 5 6 0 . 5 0 % 1 , 3 5 0 Po l i c e S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 5, 3 4 7 5, 9 4 0 (5 , 9 4 0 ) 0.00%0 Po l i c e T o t a l R E V E N U E S 1, 0 2 4 , 9 5 2 0 91 , 5 6 7 14 5 , 2 2 5 87 9 , 7 2 8 85.83%113,632 Po l i c e Po l i c e PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Po l i c e W a g e s 9, 5 3 0 , 8 0 5 0 7 1 5 , 2 0 8 1 , 4 1 8 , 9 8 5 8 , 1 1 1 , 8 2 0 8 5 . 1 1 % 1 , 3 1 0 , 3 5 7 Po l i c e K - 9 W a g e s 36 , 1 7 9 0 3 , 7 3 0 7 , 3 3 9 2 8 , 8 4 0 7 9 . 7 1 % 6 , 0 2 9 Po l i c e W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 1 8 , 5 8 5 0 1 , 7 6 0 3 , 4 8 7 1 5 , 0 9 9 8 1 . 2 4 % 3 , 2 7 0 Po l i c e O v e r t i m e W a g e s 6 6 4 , 7 2 7 0 4 6 , 5 4 5 1 2 1 , 0 3 0 5 4 3 , 6 9 8 8 1 . 7 9 % 1 0 5 , 7 4 9 Po l i c e U n i f o r m A l l o w a n c e 1 3 4 , 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 , 8 5 0 2 2 , 2 7 0 1 6 . 6 0 % 1 0 3 , 4 5 0 Po l i c e F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 79 4 , 4 0 8 0 5 6 , 2 2 4 1 2 2 , 2 5 5 6 7 2 , 1 5 3 8 4 . 6 1 % 1 1 2 , 6 0 0 Po l i c e P E R S I 1, 2 7 0 , 2 9 3 0 8 8 , 7 3 4 1 7 9 , 5 8 2 1 , 0 9 0 , 7 1 1 8 5 . 8 6 % 1 6 5 , 3 0 9 Po l i c e W o r k e r s ' C o m p 34 2 , 7 2 3 0 0 0 3 4 2 , 7 2 3 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 2 , 1 3 4 , 1 1 8 0 14 1 , 1 1 1 28 1 , 7 0 4 1, 8 5 2 , 4 1 4 86.79%253,904 Po l i c e T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 4 , 9 2 5 , 9 5 8 0 1, 0 5 3 , 3 1 1 2, 2 4 6 , 2 3 1 12 , 6 7 9 , 7 2 7 84.95%2,060,667 Po l i c e Po l i c e OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Po l i c e O f f i c e E x p e n s e 32 , 4 2 1 1 0 5 2 , 6 4 3 3 , 6 6 6 2 8 , 8 6 0 8 8 . 7 2 % 4 , 7 5 5 Po l i c e C o p i e r E x p e n s e 22 , 4 0 8 0 1 , 7 6 4 3 , 5 7 8 1 8 , 8 3 0 8 4 . 0 3 % 2 , 3 3 3 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 9 , 2 4 5 0 6 6 7 1 , 0 8 7 8 , 1 5 8 8 8 . 2 4 % 7 4 1 Po l i c e J a n i t o r i a l 60 , 8 0 3 0 4 , 6 5 8 9 , 3 1 6 5 1 , 4 8 6 8 4 . 6 7 % 4 , 5 2 3 Po l i c e S a f e t y E x p e n s e 3, 5 0 0 1 8 4 1 9 5 1 9 5 3 , 4 8 9 9 4 . 7 0 % 2 7 5 Po l i c e S h o p S u p p l i e s 4, 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 3 , 9 6 1 9 9 . 0 1 % 0 Pa g e 3 9 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 6 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Po l i c e F u e l s - G a s 28 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 , 5 0 7 2 6 4 , 4 9 3 9 4 . 4 6 % 1 1 , 9 2 1 Po l i c e C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 1 0 0 , 8 3 0 0 1 3 , 1 2 4 1 6 , 1 5 3 8 4 , 6 7 7 8 3 . 9 7 % 5 , 4 6 4 Po l i c e M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 1 5 , 2 6 7 0 1 2 , 0 3 8 1 2 , 0 3 8 3 , 2 2 9 2 1 . 1 5 % 3 3 1 Po l i c e D a t a A c c e s s E x p e n s e 1 , 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e I n v e s t i g a t i o n E x p e n s e s 1 1 , 0 0 0 0 7 2 8 8 4 8 1 0 , 1 5 2 9 2 . 2 9 % 1 , 0 2 5 Po l i c e K - 9 E x p e n s e s 6, 0 0 0 0 3 7 1 1 , 5 9 1 4 , 4 0 9 7 3 . 4 8 % 1 , 0 7 3 Po l i c e C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 9 , 9 0 0 0 1 , 1 2 5 1 , 7 2 5 8 , 1 7 5 8 2 . 5 7 % 3 , 3 2 1 Po l i c e B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 1 1 7 , 3 4 6 0 8 , 4 2 7 1 4 , 5 3 0 1 0 2 , 8 1 6 8 7 . 6 1 % 1 1 , 9 3 3 Po l i c e P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 9 , 0 8 5 0 0 5 , 9 4 5 3 , 1 4 0 3 4 . 5 6 % 0 Po l i c e V e h i c l e R e p a i r 78 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 1 1 8 , 4 5 0 6 9 , 5 5 0 8 9 . 1 6 % 6 , 0 6 3 Po l i c e V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 1 5 , 8 0 0 0 4 , 4 4 5 7 , 4 6 2 1 0 8 , 3 3 8 9 3 . 5 5 % 1 0 , 1 1 6 Po l i c e E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 4 4 5 8 9 . 0 0 % 5 5 Po l i c e S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 8 2 , 1 6 7 0 1 3 , 4 5 7 2 4 , 2 1 8 1 5 7 , 9 4 9 8 6 . 7 0 % 1 1 , 8 5 3 Po l i c e A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 4 , 3 1 5 0 1 1 2 3 3 7 3 , 9 7 8 9 2 . 1 8 % 0 Po l i c e M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 9 5 2 , 4 0 5 9 6 . 2 0 % 0 Po l i c e F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 0 0 5 5 5 5 (5 5 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 6 2 , 3 7 9 2 , 2 0 0 2 8 , 8 5 6 3 9 , 0 0 9 2 5 , 5 7 0 3 9 . 5 9 % 9 , 3 0 0 Po l i c e A m m u n i t i o n & F i r e a r m s 1 0 3 , 8 9 6 2 , 6 0 0 3 , 1 7 3 9 , 1 4 4 9 7 , 3 5 2 9 1 . 4 1 % 3 , 9 8 7 Po l i c e S W A T E q u i p m e n t 40 , 8 2 8 0 (3 8 0 ) 10 4 0 , 8 1 7 9 9 . 9 7 % 9 6 0 Po l i c e E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1 5 , 8 8 7 0 0 1 , 9 6 7 1 3 , 9 2 0 8 7 . 6 1 % 8 7 Po l i c e S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 5, 5 0 0 0 0 2 , 1 0 5 3 , 3 9 5 6 1 . 7 2 % 0 Po l i c e F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 2 , 9 5 0 0 1 4 2 3 , 4 8 8 9 , 4 6 1 7 3 . 0 6 % 7 6 5 Po l i c e C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 9 9 , 9 2 0 (5 2 0 ) 0 0 9 9 , 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 1 1 9 , 5 0 2 (7 0 , 0 0 0 ) 2, 2 7 3 1 4 , 0 6 9 3 5 , 4 3 3 7 1 . 5 7 % 1 2 , 7 0 7 Po l i c e C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 3 4 1 Po l i c e L e g a l S e r v i c e s - P r o s e c u t i o n 3 7 3 , 1 6 1 0 2 9 , 9 7 5 5 9 , 9 5 1 3 1 3 , 2 1 0 8 3 . 9 3 % 5 6 , 5 1 0 Po l i c e B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 9 , 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 9 , 2 0 0 9 5 . 8 3 % 3 , 6 3 8 Po l i c e C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 3 7 0 , 1 3 2 0 3 1 , 7 6 1 6 3 , 5 2 2 3 0 6 , 6 1 0 8 2 . 8 3 % 6 1 , 6 8 9 Po l i c e T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 1 5 , 6 5 8 (1 0 5 ) 72 1 1 , 4 4 3 1 4 , 1 1 0 9 0 . 7 2 % 1 , 4 1 2 Po l i c e P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 0 , 6 0 0 0 5 6 6 1 , 8 2 0 8 , 7 8 0 8 2 . 8 2 % 1 , 0 1 3 Po l i c e P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 3 8 , 8 6 2 5 2 0 7 , 9 1 9 1 0 , 4 8 4 2 8 , 8 9 8 7 3 . 3 7 % 6 , 3 8 3 Po l i c e I L E T S N e t w o r k 20 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 1 2 5 1 6 , 8 7 5 8 4 . 3 7 % 3 , 1 2 5 Po l i c e C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 8 4 , 1 5 2 0 5 , 1 8 7 1 0 , 6 8 5 7 3 , 4 6 8 8 7 . 3 0 % 1 0 , 8 1 3 Po l i c e B u s i n e s s M e a l s 4, 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 2 1 3 3 , 7 8 8 9 4 . 6 8 % 2 0 7 Po l i c e M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 , 9 5 0 0 0 7 4 1 , 8 7 6 9 6 . 2 0 % 0 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 9 5 , 4 3 8 0 1 7 , 9 3 3 1 9 , 8 3 3 7 5 , 6 0 4 7 9 . 2 1 % 1 1 , 5 5 3 Po l i c e T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 2 2 , 2 2 5 0 7 6 6 7 6 6 2 1 , 4 5 9 9 6 . 5 5 % 4 , 4 3 4 Po l i c e T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 4 2 , 8 6 3 0 4 7 6 4 7 6 4 2 , 3 8 6 9 8 . 8 8 % 7 , 4 5 0 Po l i c e T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2 2 , 2 2 5 0 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 , 0 0 1 9 8 . 9 9 % 4 , 6 7 0 Po l i c e A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 0 0 0 3 , 2 7 5 (3 , 2 7 5 ) 0.00% 20,421 Pa g e 4 0 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 7 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Po l i c e P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 9 , 5 0 0 0 1 , 3 7 8 1 , 3 7 8 8 , 1 2 2 8 5 . 4 9 % 1 , 5 9 7 Po l i c e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 1 2 7 , 4 9 9 0 (1 , 9 1 4 ) 56 , 7 0 6 7 0 , 7 9 3 5 5 . 5 2 % 5 7 , 2 8 3 Po l i c e E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 5 9 , 1 0 2 0 2 , 8 7 7 6 , 0 9 1 5 3 , 0 1 1 8 9 . 6 9 % 5 , 9 0 7 Po l i c e I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 2 1 , 3 3 3 0 5 3 3 7 3 0 2 0 , 6 0 3 9 6 . 5 7 % 5 2 3 Po l i c e S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 30 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 4 4 Po l i c e E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 6 2 5 0 0 0 6 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 4 Po l i c e D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 6 8 , 6 6 8 0 3 5 0 1 , 7 2 4 6 6 , 9 4 4 9 7 . 4 8 % 1 , 7 9 6 Po l i c e I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 3 , 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 6 0 7 3 9 3 1 3 . 1 1 % 2 , 6 0 8 Po l i c e H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 2, 1 4 5 0 0 0 2 , 1 4 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e P r o p e r t y A b a t e m e n t 5 , 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 2 2 5 4 , 7 7 5 9 5 . 5 0 % 2 3 5 Po l i c e M o v i n g E x p e n s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 5 0 Po l i c e M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 1 0 0 (1 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e D r u g S e i z u r e E n f o r c e m n t E x p 8 , 5 0 0 0 0 39 9 8, 1 0 1 95.30%7,074 Po l i c e T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2 , 9 4 4 , 3 8 6 (6 5 , 1 1 6 ) 19 9 , 4 0 5 44 2 , 8 3 2 2, 4 3 6 , 4 3 9 84.62%375,967 Po l i c e Po l i c e Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Po l i c e C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 4 3 2 , 4 4 0 (4 , 9 8 4 ) 14 , 9 1 5 2 9 , 0 8 8 3 9 8 , 3 6 7 9 3 . 1 9 % 1 0 4 , 4 4 2 Po l i c e C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 9 0 , 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 7 0 , 6 0 0 7 7 . 9 2 % 1 0 , 3 7 5 Po l i c e C a p i t a l - K - 9 & E q u i p m e n t 1 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e P u b l i c S a f e t y T r a i n i n g C t r 0 70 , 0 0 0 0 0 70 , 0 0 0 100.00%0 Po l i c e T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 53 9 , 0 4 0 65 , 0 1 6 14 , 9 1 5 49 , 0 8 8 55 4 , 9 6 7 91.87%114,817 Po l i c e Po l i c e DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 18 , 4 0 9 , 3 8 5 (1 0 0 ) 1, 2 6 7 , 6 3 1 2, 7 3 8 , 1 5 1 15 , 6 7 1 , 1 3 4 85.12%2,551,450 Po l i c e Po l i c e Po l i c e In t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s Po l i c e O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r I n 0 (1 4 0 , 4 8 5 ) 0 0 (1 4 0 , 4 8 5 ) 100.00%0 Po l i c e T o t a l I n t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s 0 (1 4 0 , 4 8 5 ) 0 0 (1 4 0 , 4 8 5 ) 100.00%0 Po l i c e Po l i c e TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 18 , 4 0 9 , 3 8 5 (1 4 0 , 5 8 5 ) 1, 2 6 7 , 6 3 1 2, 7 3 8 , 1 5 1 15 , 5 3 0 , 6 4 9 85.01%2,551,450 Pa g e 4 1 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 8 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi r e 2 2 1 0 - F i r e D e p a r t m e n t Fi r e RE V E N U E S Fi r e F i r e I n s p e c t i o n & P e r m i t F e e s 0 0 1 , 5 6 6 1 , 9 1 3 (1 , 9 1 3 ) 0.00% 966 Fi r e R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 7 , 8 6 2 9 , 1 7 3 (9 , 1 7 3 ) 0.00% 0 Fi r e R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 0 2 6 (2 6 ) 0.00% 0 Fi r e R u r a l F i r e & M i s c R e v e n u e 2 , 4 8 2 , 1 4 2 (1 6 , 4 8 9 ) 18 7 , 8 0 0 1 8 7 , 8 0 0 2 , 2 7 7 , 8 5 3 9 2 . 3 8 % 9 2 , 0 9 4 Fi r e I m p a c t R e v - M u l t i f a m i l y 0 0 4 1 , 8 8 1 1 2 1 , 2 3 5 (1 2 1 , 2 3 5 ) 0.00% 76,048 Fi r e I m p a c t R e v - C o m m e r c i a l 6 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 2 , 4 3 7 1 8 , 6 0 1 4 1 , 3 9 9 6 8 . 9 9 % 6 9 , 0 0 0 Fi r e I m p a c t R e v - R e s i d e n t i a l 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 7 2 , 7 4 1 1 6 3 , 1 1 7 3 3 6 , 8 8 3 6 7 . 3 7 % 1 1 9 , 5 8 2 Fi r e D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 0 5 0 1 1 , 5 3 6 (1 1 , 5 3 6 ) 0.00% 8,196 Fi r e M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%761 Fi r e T o t a l R E V E N U E S 3, 0 4 2 , 1 4 2 (1 6 , 4 8 9 ) 32 4 , 3 3 8 51 3 , 4 0 0 2, 5 1 2 , 2 5 3 83.03%366,647 Fi r e Fi r e PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Fi r e W a g e s 6, 9 4 0 , 3 0 8 0 5 3 8 , 8 9 2 1 , 0 5 9 , 9 9 1 5 , 8 8 0 , 3 1 7 8 4 . 7 2 % 9 4 4 , 7 8 6 Fi r e W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 1 5 , 9 6 1 0 1 , 1 6 2 2 , 4 2 1 1 3 , 5 4 0 8 4 . 8 3 % 2 , 7 9 2 Fi r e O v e r t i m e W a g e s 6 1 4 , 7 9 3 0 6 7 , 2 0 4 1 2 5 , 9 1 8 4 8 8 , 8 7 4 7 9 . 5 1 % 1 4 0 , 7 0 1 Fi r e F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 57 9 , 1 8 6 0 4 4 , 3 1 2 8 6 , 8 9 5 4 9 2 , 2 9 1 8 4 . 9 9 % 8 0 , 2 2 5 Fi r e P E R S I 92 6 , 6 3 5 0 7 0 , 1 0 8 1 3 8 , 0 8 4 7 8 8 , 5 5 1 8 5 . 0 9 % 1 2 6 , 3 6 8 Fi r e W o r k e r s ' C o m p 33 1 , 9 3 8 0 0 0 3 3 1 , 9 3 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 1 , 3 2 2 , 5 5 2 0 95 , 5 9 0 19 1 , 6 9 9 1, 1 3 0 , 8 5 3 85.50%178,285 Fi r e T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 0 , 7 3 1 , 3 7 3 0 81 7 , 2 6 7 1, 6 0 5 , 0 0 8 9, 1 2 6 , 3 6 4 85.04%1,473,156 Fi r e Fi r e OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Fi r e O f f i c e E x p e n s e 7, 9 5 0 0 3 8 8 6 7 3 7 , 2 7 7 9 1 . 5 3 % 6 3 9 Fi r e C o p i e r E x p e n s e 8, 6 7 1 0 5 9 7 5 9 7 8 , 0 7 4 9 3 . 1 1 % 5 4 6 Fi r e E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 5 , 6 4 0 0 0 9 5 , 6 3 1 9 9 . 8 3 % 6 3 4 Fi r e J a n i t o r i a l 15 , 2 9 8 0 1 , 0 5 7 1 , 6 4 6 1 3 , 6 5 1 8 9 . 2 3 % 1 , 0 7 4 Fi r e S a f e t y E x p e n s e 20 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e S h o p S u p p l i e s 5, 2 0 0 0 3 3 5 4 2 1 4 , 7 7 9 9 1 . 9 0 % 6 3 5 Fi r e D i s p a t c h S e r v i c e 9 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 , 7 8 1 7 4 , 2 1 9 7 7 . 3 1 % 0 Fi r e F u e l s - G a s 95 , 6 5 0 0 1 8 1 8 9 5 , 6 3 2 9 9 . 9 8 % 5 , 3 8 6 Fi r e F u e l s - D i e s e l / P r o p a n e 2 , 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 8 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 9 , 7 2 6 3 4 , 0 2 2 5 0 , 9 7 8 5 9 . 9 7 % 1 2 , 9 0 0 Fi r e S C B A / B o t t l e s / C o T e s t e r 3 4 , 4 2 5 0 0 5 4 6 3 3 , 8 7 9 9 8 . 4 1 % 9 0 5 Fi r e M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 2 8 7 5 , 5 3 7 9 , 4 6 3 6 3 . 0 8 % 1 , 5 5 6 Fi r e J P A M e d i c a l S v c & S u p p l i e s 3 3 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 6 0 5 Fi r e C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 1 , 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 , 4 0 0 9 3 . 3 1 % 2 5 2 Fi r e B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 7 4 , 8 2 5 0 2 , 9 7 0 8 , 0 6 6 6 6 , 7 5 9 8 9 . 2 2 % 6 , 6 6 4 Pa g e 4 2 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 5 9 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi r e P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 1 , 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e V e h i c l e R e p a i r 59 , 8 0 0 0 5 2 9 4 , 5 0 3 5 5 , 2 9 7 9 2 . 4 6 % 1 7 , 1 3 3 Fi r e V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 3 , 5 0 0 0 6 , 0 2 5 9 , 3 3 1 4 4 , 1 6 9 8 2 . 5 5 % 1 2 , 1 0 7 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 2 4 , 8 1 5 0 1 6 0 3 , 2 0 0 2 1 , 6 1 5 8 7 . 1 0 % 3 , 1 6 2 Fi r e G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 6 2 5 0 0 0 6 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 1 2 , 8 6 4 0 1 1 , 1 0 2 1 2 , 7 2 9 1 0 0 , 1 3 5 8 8 . 7 2 % 1 1 , 7 7 4 Fi r e A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 7 , 8 8 2 0 2 5 8 7 7 3 7 , 1 0 9 9 0 . 1 9 % 0 Fi r e F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 1 , 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 1 8 2 , 3 1 7 0 3 1 , 0 6 4 3 2 , 7 2 3 1 4 9 , 5 9 4 8 2 . 0 5 % 9 , 5 8 5 Fi r e T u r n o u t E q u i p m e n t 1 3 8 , 5 2 6 0 9 , 1 3 5 1 3 , 7 8 4 1 2 4 , 7 4 2 9 0 . 0 4 % 1 8 , 4 9 4 Fi r e E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 7 , 1 5 0 0 4 1 0 2 7 , 0 4 8 9 8 . 5 6 % 7 4 Fi r e F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 1 , 7 0 9 0 1 , 8 8 3 1 , 8 9 7 9 , 8 1 1 8 3 . 7 9 % 5 , 7 8 8 Fi r e C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 1 6 , 9 5 0 0 0 0 1 6 , 9 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 6 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 2 5 0 5 , 2 5 0 5 4 , 7 5 0 9 1 . 2 5 % 0 Fi r e P r e v e n t a t i v e H e a l t h E x p 4 5 , 7 0 5 0 0 0 4 5 , 7 0 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 8 7 0 Fi r e B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 1 4 , 3 0 0 0 3 , 2 2 7 3 , 2 2 7 1 1 , 0 7 3 7 7 . 4 3 % 1 , 8 7 0 Fi r e T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 4 , 9 2 8 0 4 4 6 8 9 3 4 , 0 3 5 8 1 . 8 8 % 7 8 7 Fi r e P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 2 , 2 8 2 0 1 4 9 2 5 1 2 , 0 3 1 8 9 . 0 0 % 2 6 9 Fi r e P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 6 , 3 0 5 0 1 9 3 8 6 , 2 6 7 9 9 . 4 0 % 1 , 8 3 3 Fi r e C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 5 , 6 2 0 0 1 , 1 4 2 2 , 8 4 3 1 2 , 7 7 7 8 1 . 7 9 % 1 , 3 4 2 Fi r e B u s i n e s s M e a l s 2, 4 0 0 0 1 3 6 1 3 6 2 , 2 6 4 9 4 . 3 2 % 0 Fi r e M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 5 0 , 2 6 7 0 3 , 8 7 0 1 1 , 3 8 5 3 8 , 8 8 2 7 7 . 3 5 % 5 , 5 0 2 Fi r e T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 5 , 5 8 6 0 7 6 1 1 , 5 8 1 1 4 , 0 0 5 8 9 . 8 5 % 8 9 4 Fi r e T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 2 7 , 8 7 0 0 5 , 0 7 5 6 , 3 2 8 2 1 , 5 4 2 7 7 . 2 9 % 1 , 0 1 9 Fi r e T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1 4 , 7 8 1 0 5 7 6 1 , 0 2 4 1 3 , 7 5 7 9 3 . 0 7 % 6 5 5 Fi r e C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 6 , 9 6 9 0 1 , 3 9 2 1 , 3 9 2 5 , 5 7 7 8 0 . 0 2 % 1 , 0 2 1 Fi r e A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 7 , 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 4 0 6 , 8 6 0 9 8 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 4 Fi r e P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 2 , 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 1 3 Fi r e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 8 9 , 5 9 4 0 0 3 9 , 5 9 7 4 9 , 9 9 7 5 5 . 8 0 % 3 8 , 0 9 2 Fi r e E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 3 3 , 5 0 0 0 2 , 0 1 3 4 , 2 2 6 2 9 , 2 7 4 8 7 . 3 8 % 4 , 0 2 0 Fi r e I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 2 2 , 7 0 0 0 8 0 8 1 , 1 4 9 2 1 , 5 5 1 9 4 . 9 3 % 6 4 7 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 4 0 0 0 0 5 , 1 6 9 (4 , 7 6 9 ) (1,192.37)% 0 Fi r e D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 2 9 , 0 7 9 0 1 , 1 9 3 5 , 7 4 4 2 3 , 3 3 5 8 0 . 2 4 % 3 , 6 7 7 Fi r e I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 7 9 3 7 0 7 4 7 . 1 5 % 8 5 6 Fi r e H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 1, 3 8 0 0 0 0 1, 3 8 0 100.00%0 Fi r e T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1 , 5 5 4 , 3 6 2 0 11 6 , 8 3 4 24 3 , 6 2 6 1, 3 1 0 , 7 3 6 84.33%176,554 Fi r e Fi r e Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Pa g e 4 3 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 0 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi r e C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 3 , 5 4 8 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 5 4 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 3 2 , 2 2 5 0 0 0 3 2 , 2 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 2 , 2 7 8 Fi r e Fi r e C a p i t a l - F i r e T r u c k s 1 , 2 6 8 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 6 8 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 3 3 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 , 0 0 0 100.00%0 Fi r e T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 4, 8 8 1 , 7 2 5 0 0 0 4, 8 8 1 , 7 2 5 100.00%62,278 Fi r e Fi r e DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 17 , 1 6 7 , 4 6 0 0 93 4 , 1 0 1 1, 8 4 8 , 6 3 4 15 , 3 1 8 , 8 2 6 89.23%1,711,989 Fi r e Fi r e Tr a n s f e r s Fi r e P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 2 1 , 1 0 3 0 7 0 9 1 , 4 5 7 1 9 , 6 4 6 9 3 . 0 9 % 3 , 1 1 0 Fi r e O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 6 5 , 9 1 0 0 3, 6 5 6 8, 3 8 5 57 , 5 2 4 87.27%6,628 Fi r e T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 87 , 0 1 3 0 4, 3 6 5 9, 8 4 3 77 , 1 7 0 88.69%9,739 Fi r e Fi r e In t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s Fi r e O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r I n 0 (1 4 0 , 4 8 5 ) 0 0 (1 4 0 , 4 8 5 ) 100.00%0 Fi r e T o t a l I n t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s 0 (1 4 0 , 4 8 5 ) 0 0 (1 4 0 , 4 8 5 ) 100.00%0 Fi r e Fi r e TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 17 , 2 5 4 , 4 7 3 (1 4 0 , 4 8 5 ) 93 8 , 4 6 6 1, 8 5 8 , 4 7 7 15 , 2 5 5 , 5 1 1 89.14%1,721,727 Fi r e Pa g e 4 4 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 1 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s 2 2 5 0 - P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n Pa r k s RE V E N U E S Pa r k s G r a n t R e v e n u e s 4 7 3 , 4 9 2 0 0 0 4 7 3 , 4 9 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 7 , 6 6 6 7 , 7 1 6 2 2 , 2 8 4 7 4 . 2 8 % 7 , 7 5 7 Pa r k s R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 0 Pa r k s M e r i d i a n D o w n t o w n D e v e l o p m e n t 4 1 5 , 7 5 5 0 0 0 4 1 5 , 7 5 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s R e n t a l I n c o m e 0 0 1 2 , 5 4 5 1 9 , 5 9 8 (1 9 , 5 9 8 ) 0.00% 19,598 Pa r k s C h e r r y L a n e G o l f L e a s e R e v e n u e 0 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 (6 , 0 0 0 ) 0.00% 0 Pa r k s P a r k R e s e r v a t i o n s F e e R e v e n u e 1 1 2 , 2 0 0 0 1 0 , 9 7 6 2 2 , 2 4 7 8 9 , 9 5 3 8 0 . 1 7 % 2 , 9 8 9 Pa r k s R e c r e a t i o n C l a s s R e v e n u e s 2 3 7 , 5 0 0 0 5 , 0 1 0 1 3 , 7 7 1 2 2 3 , 7 2 9 9 4 . 2 0 % 1 3 , 9 3 1 Pa r k s C o m m u n i t y E v e n t R e v / S p o n s o r s h i p 3 7 , 5 0 0 0 5 , 4 7 0 1 0 , 4 9 5 2 7 , 0 0 5 7 2 . 0 1 % 9 , 2 4 4 Pa r k s S p o r t s R e v e n u e 2 5 1 , 5 0 0 (7 , 0 0 0 ) 4, 6 9 4 8 , 9 9 6 2 3 5 , 5 0 4 9 6 . 3 2 % 2 4 , 6 5 0 Pa r k s I m p a c t R e v - M u l t i f a m i l y 0 0 5 8 , 3 3 2 1 6 8 , 8 5 4 (1 6 8 , 8 5 4 ) 0.00% 105,918 Pa r k s I m p a c t R e v - R e s i d e n t i a l 1 , 0 3 8 , 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 , 6 5 5 3 1 9 , 8 9 3 7 1 8 , 1 0 7 6 9 . 1 8 % 2 3 4 , 5 1 6 Pa r k s C o n t r a c t S e r v i c e R e v e n u e s 7 , 0 0 0 0 3 3 5 4 4 5 6 , 5 5 5 9 3 . 6 4 % 5 0 Pa r k s D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 0 (3 0 0 ) ( 2 0 0 ) 20 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 5 4 , 0 0 0 (2 7 , 0 0 0 ) 28 0 2 8 0 2 6 , 7 2 0 9 8 . 9 6 % 3 0 4 Pa r k s I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 , 4 3 0 (4 3 0 ) (2.86)% 18,048 Pa r k s S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%70 Pa r k s T o t a l R E V E N U E S 2, 6 7 1 , 9 4 7 (3 4 , 0 0 0 ) 24 7 , 6 6 2 59 3 , 5 2 4 2, 0 4 4 , 4 2 3 77.50%437,094 Pa r k s Pa r k s PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Pa r k s W a g e s 1, 3 9 8 , 1 3 9 0 1 0 8 , 8 5 2 2 1 9 , 0 4 1 1 , 1 7 9 , 0 9 8 8 4 . 3 3 % 1 9 6 , 5 5 3 Pa r k s W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 5 6 5 , 8 9 9 0 2 8 , 5 0 7 6 5 , 7 6 6 5 0 0 , 1 3 3 8 8 . 3 7 % 5 3 , 8 3 0 Pa r k s O v e r t i m e W a g e s 22 , 7 9 8 0 2 , 6 6 3 4 , 9 4 9 1 7 , 8 4 9 7 8 . 2 9 % 5 , 5 6 5 Pa r k s F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 15 2 , 3 0 3 0 1 0 , 2 7 2 2 1 , 2 8 6 1 3 1 , 0 1 6 8 6 . 0 2 % 1 8 , 6 6 9 Pa r k s P E R S I 17 3 , 4 6 3 0 1 4 , 3 3 4 2 7 , 1 1 0 1 4 6 , 3 5 4 8 4 . 3 7 % 2 2 , 5 6 5 Pa r k s W o r k e r s ' C o m p 57 , 2 2 5 0 0 0 5 7 , 2 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 7 0 6 , 3 6 3 0 34 , 1 7 4 68 , 4 3 7 63 7 , 9 2 6 90.31%68,749 Pa r k s T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 3 , 0 7 6 , 1 9 1 0 19 8 , 8 0 2 40 6 , 5 9 0 2, 6 6 9 , 6 0 1 86.78%365,931 Pa r k s Pa r k s OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Pa r k s O f f i c e E x p e n s e 6, 6 3 2 0 4 5 5 1 , 6 5 0 4 , 9 8 2 7 5 . 1 2 % 1 , 0 1 6 Pa r k s C o p i e r E x p e n s e 5, 9 3 1 0 3 8 7 3 8 7 5 , 5 4 4 9 3 . 4 8 % 5 9 3 Pa r k s S p r a y i n g / F e r t i l i z e r 8 1 , 0 9 4 0 3 , 1 3 1 3 , 1 3 1 7 7 , 9 6 3 9 6 . 1 3 % 0 Pa r k s E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 3 , 4 8 0 0 3 8 4 4 3 , 4 3 6 9 8 . 7 2 % 1 8 8 Pa r k s J a n i t o r i a l 49 , 2 0 8 0 4 , 1 4 8 7 , 9 6 3 4 1 , 2 4 5 8 3 . 8 1 % 1 , 0 7 1 Pa r k s R e s t r o o m S u p p l i e s 2 8 , 2 2 8 0 6 7 2 1 2 , 8 4 4 1 5 , 3 8 4 5 4 . 4 9 % 1 3 , 7 9 8 Pa r k s S a f e t y E x p e n s e 3, 2 7 1 0 1 6 7 6 2 3 2 , 6 4 8 8 0 . 9 5 % 2 2 1 Pa g e 4 5 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 2 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s S h o p S u p p l i e s 9, 8 3 5 0 3 2 7 2 , 1 0 9 7 , 7 2 6 7 8 . 5 5 % 1 4 5 Pa r k s F u e l s - G a s 67 , 1 2 5 0 2 , 2 7 3 5 , 7 1 6 6 1 , 4 0 9 9 1 . 4 8 % 5 , 5 9 4 Pa r k s C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 6 , 7 3 6 0 4 1 0 4 1 0 6 , 3 2 6 9 3 . 9 1 % 4 3 3 Pa r k s M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 1 , 6 3 9 0 0 3 0 1 , 6 0 9 9 8 . 1 5 % 0 Pa r k s R e c r e a t i o n C l a s s E x p e n s e 2 9 , 4 5 0 0 0 0 2 9 , 4 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s R e c r e a t i o n S p o r t s E x p e n s e s 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 0 9 , 2 9 0 2 2 , 2 2 6 1 1 7 , 7 7 5 8 4 . 1 2 % 1 7 , 3 3 8 Pa r k s C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 5 4 , 0 0 0 0 8 7 7 2 , 5 4 2 5 1 , 4 5 8 9 5 . 2 9 % 8 1 0 Pa r k s B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 1 2 8 , 1 7 9 0 1 , 0 1 7 5 , 9 9 7 1 2 2 , 1 8 2 9 5 . 3 2 % 1 8 , 4 8 0 Pa r k s P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 4 0 , 6 9 6 0 0 6 3 9 4 0 , 0 5 7 9 8 . 4 2 % 4 3 1 Pa r k s V e h i c l e R e p a i r 16 , 5 0 0 0 2 7 2 6 6 7 1 5 , 8 3 3 9 5 . 9 5 % 1 9 0 Pa r k s V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 6 , 5 0 0 0 5 , 3 0 6 6 , 3 2 5 1 0 , 1 7 5 6 1 . 6 6 % 3 1 9 Pa r k s E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 4 3 , 6 0 5 0 2 , 1 1 9 7 , 7 5 2 3 5 , 8 5 3 8 2 . 2 2 % 2 , 2 6 1 Pa r k s F o r e s t r y E x p e n s e 5 4 , 3 8 3 0 7 0 2 8 , 0 9 8 4 6 , 2 8 5 8 5 . 1 0 % 1 , 8 9 7 Pa r k s D o w n t o w n T r e e M a i n t e n a n c e 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 7 0 8 1 , 7 0 8 7 3 , 2 9 2 9 7 . 7 2 % (65) Pa r k s G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 2 7 2 , 7 4 3 0 6 , 9 3 7 3 3 , 5 0 5 2 3 9 , 2 3 9 8 7 . 7 1 % 2 7 , 4 3 9 Pa r k s V a n d a l i s m C l e a n u p E x p 4 , 1 5 8 0 0 0 4 , 1 5 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s T u r f R e h a b 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 7 7 0 Pa r k s S u r f a c e W e l l M a i n t 2 2 , 4 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 , 4 0 3 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 1 , 8 1 9 0 0 7 3 8 1 1 , 0 8 1 9 3 . 7 5 % 6 8 9 Pa r k s A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 3 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S e r v i c e s 9 , 0 0 0 0 9 , 0 0 0 9 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 9 , 2 5 7 0 1 , 0 7 1 1 , 0 7 1 8 , 1 8 6 8 8 . 4 3 % 0 Pa r k s E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 4 3 , 0 3 4 0 4 , 0 3 2 9 , 9 1 0 3 3 , 1 2 4 7 6 . 9 7 % 1 1 , 7 9 4 Pa r k s E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1 7 , 4 2 9 0 1 , 2 1 1 1 , 2 8 8 1 6 , 1 4 1 9 2 . 6 1 % 5 , 3 6 0 Pa r k s S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 12 , 4 6 1 0 0 1 3 , 8 1 5 (1 , 3 5 4 ) (10.86)% 0 Pa r k s F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 3 , 0 8 2 0 0 4 5 2 1 2 , 6 3 0 9 6 . 5 4 % 2 0 0 Pa r k s C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 6 , 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 , 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 5 2 , 7 4 9 0 0 0 5 2 , 7 4 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % (1,516) Pa r k s I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 0 0 0 1 9 0 (1 9 0 ) 0.00% 379 Pa r k s C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 3 0 6 , 3 2 1 (1 9 0 , 3 2 1 ) 5, 2 9 4 1 5 , 8 7 2 1 0 0 , 1 2 8 8 6 . 3 1 % 4 6 , 9 3 7 Pa r k s B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 2 , 1 0 0 0 0 3 7 2 , 0 6 3 9 8 . 2 3 % 9 3 Pa r k s C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 0 1 9 0 , 3 2 1 5 9 0 2 4 , 1 6 1 1 6 6 , 1 6 0 8 7 . 3 0 % 0 Pa r k s T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 1 , 0 1 0 0 9 7 1 9 4 8 1 6 8 0 . 7 9 % 1 , 0 6 6 Pa r k s P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 , 0 0 0 0 4 9 7 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 . 5 2 % 3 1 5 Pa r k s P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 4 , 5 8 4 0 2 1 2 3 9 7 4 , 1 8 7 9 1 . 3 4 % 1 4 1 Pa r k s C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 2 5 , 9 1 1 0 1 , 0 8 6 2 , 3 5 0 2 3 , 5 6 1 9 0 . 9 2 % 2 , 0 9 7 Pa r k s B u s i n e s s M e a l s 40 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 5 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 Pa r k s E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 6 , 5 2 6 0 1 , 2 6 9 1 , 3 4 4 1 5 , 1 8 2 9 1 . 8 6 % 3 , 6 1 5 Pa g e 4 6 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 3 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 4 , 7 9 9 0 0 0 4 , 7 9 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 4 1 4 Pa r k s T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 6 , 5 8 2 0 0 0 6 , 5 8 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 3 3 7 Pa r k s T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 3 , 1 2 8 0 0 0 3 , 1 2 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 2 9 9 Pa r k s A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 1 1 , 0 0 0 0 3 3 8 3 8 7 1 0 , 6 1 3 9 6 . 4 8 % 2 2 Pa r k s L e g a l N o t i c e s 60 0 0 2 4 4 2 4 4 3 5 6 5 9 . 3 0 % 1 5 5 Pa r k s P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 2 8 , 1 0 0 0 2 8 1 9 2 2 7 , 9 0 7 9 9 . 3 1 % 0 Pa r k s I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 1 8 , 9 5 3 0 0 8 , 3 7 6 1 0 , 5 7 6 5 5 . 8 0 % 8 , 0 5 8 Pa r k s E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 1 8 1 , 1 1 7 7 , 0 0 0 1 1 , 8 4 3 2 3 , 3 2 2 1 6 4 , 7 9 4 8 7 . 6 0 % 1 8 , 9 2 6 Pa r k s I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 2 3 , 7 8 7 0 4 7 3 6 8 2 2 3 , 1 0 5 9 7 . 1 3 % 4 0 9 Pa r k s E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 5 3 , 1 3 8 0 2 , 9 4 7 5 , 8 0 8 4 7 , 3 3 0 8 9 . 0 6 % 6 , 6 5 9 Pa r k s D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 9 , 6 4 6 0 8 0 5 4 , 9 8 7 4 , 6 5 9 4 8 . 3 0 % 4 , 4 1 3 Pa r k s C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 9 8 2 1 8 2 . 0 8 % 1 4 2 Pa r k s I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 5 4 , 2 8 8 0 3 , 3 9 2 4 1 , 8 2 8 1 2 , 4 6 0 2 2 . 9 5 % 3 7 , 5 4 4 Pa r k s A D A C o m p l i a n c e 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 5 3 , 0 2 5 0 1 8 , 1 9 3 2 1 , 8 1 3 3 1 , 2 1 2 5 8 . 8 6 % 1 0 , 1 0 9 Pa r k s M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 2 0 (2 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s V o l u n t e e r A p p r e c i a t i o n e x p e n s e 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 , 4 6 7 9 8 . 6 9 % 6 3 Pa r k s B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 2 5 , 0 0 0 0 85 2 1, 7 3 9 23 , 2 6 1 93.04%1,373 Pa r k s T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2 , 4 7 4 , 8 1 0 6, 9 8 0 10 3 , 7 0 7 31 5 , 3 2 8 2, 1 6 6 , 4 6 2 87.29%258,023 Pa r k s Pa r k s Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Pa r k s C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 6 3 4 , 1 8 1 0 0 0 6 3 4 , 1 8 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s B u i l d i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s 1 5 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 , 2 6 2 Pa r k s P a t h w a y d e v e l o p m e n t 1 , 1 1 6 , 6 5 0 0 6 6 2 5 , 8 4 1 1 , 1 1 0 , 8 0 9 9 9 . 4 7 % 7 , 6 6 5 Pa r k s I m p r o v e m e n t s @ T u l l y P a r k 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 4 , 0 0 0 Pa r k s I m p r o v e m e n t s @ S t o r e y P a r k 1 2 8 , 4 7 5 0 0 5 9 , 4 4 0 6 9 , 0 3 5 5 3 . 7 3 % 0 Pa r k s S t r e e t s c a p e i r r i g a t i o n l a n d s c a p i n g 4 9 1 , 3 7 7 0 0 0 4 9 1 , 3 7 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 9 , 2 9 1 Pa r k s B o r u p P r o p e r t y c o n s t r u c t i o n 1 5 6 , 6 9 9 0 0 0 1 5 6 , 6 9 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 6 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 2 , 3 0 1 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 3 0 8 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 , 5 1 9 2 7 7 , 4 8 1 9 0 . 0 9 % 0 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - C o m m u n i c a t i o n E q u i p m e n t 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s B e a r C r e e k D e v e l o p m e n t 3 2 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s K e i t h B i r d L e g a c y P a r k c o n s t r u c t i o n 1, 2 6 8 , 9 7 0 0 1 1 , 2 6 9 1 8 4 , 2 1 8 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 5 2 8 5 . 4 8 % 1 0 , 6 5 1 Pa r k s K l e i n e r M e m o r i a l P a r k 5 1 , 1 1 1 0 0 0 5 1 , 1 1 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 , 4 2 9 Pa r k s 7 7 a c r e S o u t h P a r k 6 , 5 8 5 , 1 1 5 0 3 5 , 2 2 8 1 0 3 , 7 9 7 6 , 4 8 1 , 3 1 9 9 8 . 4 2 % 6 , 5 2 2 Pa r k s R e t a H u s k e y P a r k 1 , 1 0 4 , 7 7 3 0 4 , 6 2 0 3 9 , 0 5 9 1 , 0 6 5 , 7 1 5 9 6 . 4 6 % 3 1 , 3 3 5 Pa r k s H i l l s d a l e P a r k C o n s t r u c t i o n 1 , 3 1 1 , 0 9 6 0 2, 0 2 2 23 0 , 5 8 2 1, 0 8 0 , 5 1 4 82.41%2,195 Pa r k s T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 1 3 , 4 8 2 , 4 4 8 0 53 , 8 0 2 65 3 , 4 5 5 12 , 8 2 8 , 9 9 3 95.15%229,650 Pa r k s Pa g e 4 7 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 4 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 19 , 0 3 3 , 4 4 9 6, 9 8 0 35 6 , 3 1 1 1, 3 7 5 , 3 7 3 17 , 6 6 5 , 0 5 6 92.77%853,604 Pa r k s Pa r k s Tr a n s f e r s Pa r k s P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 1 3 , 6 6 8 0 4 5 9 9 4 4 1 2 , 7 2 4 9 3 . 0 9 % 2 , 0 1 5 Pa r k s O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 4 2 , 6 8 9 0 2, 3 6 8 5, 4 3 1 37 , 2 5 8 87.27%4,293 Pa r k s T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 56 , 3 5 7 0 2, 8 2 7 6, 3 7 5 49 , 9 8 2 88.69%6,308 Pa r k s Pa r k s TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 19 , 0 8 9 , 8 0 6 6, 9 8 0 35 9 , 1 3 8 1, 3 8 1 , 7 4 8 17 , 7 1 5 , 0 3 8 92.76%859,911 Pa r k s Pa g e 4 8 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 5 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual PW 3 2 0 0 - P u b l i c W o r k s PW RE V E N U E S PW R e v i e w F e e s 10 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 2 , 7 5 2 5 1 , 5 1 6 4 8 , 4 8 4 4 8 . 4 8 % 4 5 , 8 9 7 PW Q L P E R e v i e w R e v e n u e 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 , 3 8 0 1 1 , 9 6 0 3 8 , 0 4 0 7 6 . 0 8 % 9 , 3 6 0 PW F i l i n g F e e s - R e v e n u e s 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 3 , 8 9 2 PW D e p t S v c F e e s 0 0 0 18 8 (1 8 8 ) 0.00%535 PW T o t a l R E V E N U E S 20 0 , 0 0 0 0 36 , 1 3 2 63 , 6 6 4 13 6 , 3 3 6 68.17%69,684 PW PW PE R S O N N E L C O S T S PW W a g e s 2, 6 2 4 , 0 0 9 0 1 9 0 , 5 5 9 3 6 8 , 3 8 9 2 , 2 5 5 , 6 2 0 8 5 . 9 6 % 3 7 3 , 3 4 8 PW W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 , 7 5 2 PW O v e r t i m e W a g e s 15 , 5 2 6 0 0 8 4 0 1 4 , 6 8 6 9 4 . 5 8 % 2 , 6 7 2 PW F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 20 0 , 6 0 8 0 1 4 , 0 2 9 2 7 , 1 7 7 1 7 3 , 4 3 1 8 6 . 4 5 % 2 8 , 2 0 5 PW P E R S I 31 2 , 1 8 2 0 2 1 , 1 5 1 4 1 , 3 7 6 2 7 0 , 8 0 6 8 6 . 7 4 % 4 3 , 3 1 6 PW W o r k e r s ' C o m p 83 , 6 8 4 0 0 0 8 3 , 6 8 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 6 6 1 , 2 7 6 0 36 , 0 3 1 70 , 7 6 0 59 0 , 5 1 6 89.29%71,170 PW T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 3 , 8 9 7 , 2 8 4 0 26 1 , 7 7 0 50 8 , 5 4 2 3, 3 8 8 , 7 4 2 86.95%525,462 PW PW OP E R A T I N G C O S T S PW O f f i c e E x p e n s e 13 , 4 7 9 0 9 6 2 1 , 3 7 1 1 2 , 1 0 8 8 9 . 8 2 % 1 , 2 6 4 PW C o p i e r E x p e n s e 9, 4 4 7 0 7 0 2 1 , 4 0 3 8 , 0 4 4 8 5 . 1 4 % 1 , 5 5 7 PW E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 2 , 6 4 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 , 5 1 8 9 5 . 3 8 % 1 6 8 PW S a f e t y E x p e n s e 4, 8 4 4 0 1 5 0 6 9 5 4 , 1 4 9 8 5 . 6 5 % 8 6 7 PW F u e l s - G a s 12 , 6 2 0 0 0 (8 9 ) 12 , 7 1 0 1 0 0 . 7 0 % 6 6 4 PW C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 4 , 1 5 0 0 2 1 0 4 5 6 3 , 6 9 4 8 9 . 0 1 % 2 7 9 PW C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW V e h i c l e R e p a i r 4, 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 3 3 , 5 8 7 8 9 . 6 6 % 0 PW V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 4 , 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 8 3 , 7 7 2 9 4 . 2 9 % 1 , 6 9 7 PW S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 4 0 , 8 7 3 0 0 8 , 6 5 0 3 2 , 2 2 3 7 8 . 8 3 % 1 1 , 6 0 2 PW E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 2 , 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 , 5 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 8 5 , 3 8 2 9 7 . 8 5 % 9 5 PW S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 66 0 0 0 5 7 0 9 0 1 3 . 7 0 % 0 PW F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 , 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 7 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 , 0 0 6 PW C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 1 1 , 6 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 , 6 3 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 3 3 1 , 0 0 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 3 2 3 , 0 0 0 9 7 . 5 8 % 8 , 0 0 0 PW P r o f e s s i o n a l S v c - P W W a s t e w a t e r 8 5 1 , 5 6 3 0 3 5 , 7 1 3 3 5 , 7 1 3 8 1 5 , 8 5 0 9 5 . 8 0 % 6 , 2 9 3 PW P r o f e s s i o n a l S v c - P W W a t e r 3 6 4 , 5 6 6 0 6 , 1 6 8 7 , 6 4 9 3 5 6 , 9 1 7 9 7 . 9 0 % 1 5 , 2 8 1 PW P R O F E S S I O N A L S V C f o r Q L P E R e v i e w s 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 8 , 3 2 0 8 , 3 2 0 4 1 , 6 8 0 8 3 . 3 6 % 5 , 7 2 0 PW C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa g e 4 9 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 6 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual PW L e g a l S e r v i c e s 15 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 6 4 0 PW T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 4 5 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 , 4 6 8 9 7 . 8 3 % 4 6 PW P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 4 , 5 4 0 0 3 0 7 6 1 9 3 , 9 2 1 8 6 . 3 7 % 3 6 7 PW C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 4 , 3 0 0 0 1 , 1 0 5 2 , 2 3 0 1 2 , 0 7 0 8 4 . 4 0 % 1 , 6 0 2 PW B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 5 7 6 6 3 4 3 3 . 8 1 % 1 9 9 PW M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 8 0 0 1 2 1 5 1 6 6 9 1 . 9 4 % 0 PW E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 8 7 , 1 5 8 0 1 2 0 4 , 4 3 1 8 2 , 7 2 7 9 4 . 9 1 % 8 , 4 0 6 PW T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 5 , 1 2 2 0 0 2 6 2 1 4 , 8 6 0 9 8 . 2 6 % 3 6 1 PW T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 7 , 0 8 5 0 0 2 , 9 1 9 1 4 , 1 6 6 8 2 . 9 1 % 1 , 7 2 9 PW T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 7 , 3 6 0 0 0 1 , 0 5 0 6 , 3 1 0 8 5 . 7 3 % 1 , 0 5 4 PW A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 4 7 , 2 0 0 0 3 , 6 1 8 3 , 6 9 8 4 3 , 5 0 2 9 2 . 1 6 % 0 PW L e g a l N o t i c e s 42 3 0 0 0 4 2 3 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 4 , 5 2 0 0 1 8 5 1 8 5 4 , 3 3 5 9 5 . 9 0 % 1 3 PW I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 4 , 7 7 2 0 2 2 9 2 2 9 4 , 5 4 3 9 5 . 2 0 % 0 PW D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 8 5 , 7 1 4 0 1 , 6 7 0 2 5 , 7 5 7 5 9 , 9 5 7 6 9 . 9 4 % 2 6 , 2 7 8 PW H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 66 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 4 1 PW M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 3 0 (3 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW E m p l o y e e E d u c a t i o n R e i m b u r s e m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%1,785 PW T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2 , 0 3 1 , 0 3 7 (3 0 ) 63 , 7 0 3 11 5 , 1 1 1 1, 9 1 5 , 8 9 6 94.33%107,315 PW PW Ca p i t a l O u t l a y PW C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 3 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 , 0 0 0 100.00%26,778 PW T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 35 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 , 0 0 0 100.00%26,778 PW PW DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 5, 9 6 3 , 3 2 1 (3 0 ) 32 5 , 4 7 3 62 3 , 6 5 3 5, 3 3 9 , 6 3 8 89.54%659,555 PW PW Tr a n s f e r s PW P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 2 0 4 , 2 3 7 0 6 , 1 7 5 1 2 , 3 7 7 1 9 1 , 8 6 0 9 3 . 9 3 % 1 4 , 8 1 2 PW O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 1 1 7 , 0 1 5 0 6, 4 9 1 14 , 8 8 7 10 2 , 1 2 7 87.27%11,768 PW T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 32 1 , 2 5 2 0 12 , 6 6 6 27 , 2 6 4 29 3 , 9 8 8 91.51%26,580 PW PW TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 6, 2 8 4 , 5 7 3 (3 0 ) 33 8 , 1 3 9 65 0 , 9 1 7 5, 6 3 3 , 6 2 6 89.64%686,135 Pa g e 5 0 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 7 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual MU B S 3 3 0 0 - M e r i d i a n U t i l i t y B i l l i n g MU B S RE V E N U E S MU B S D e p t S v c F e e s 30 , 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 4 2 0 2 9 , 5 8 0 9 8 . 6 0 % 1 , 5 3 9 MU B S G a r b a g e - A d m i n F e e R e v e n u e 7 1 6 , 3 6 9 0 63 , 3 9 0 63 , 3 9 0 65 2 , 9 7 9 91.15%0 MU B S T o t a l R E V E N U E S 74 6 , 3 6 9 0 63 , 5 3 0 63 , 8 1 0 68 2 , 5 5 9 91.45%1,539 MU B S MU B S PE R S O N N E L C O S T S MU B S W a g e s 33 8 , 6 5 7 0 2 3 , 6 8 3 4 7 , 7 3 9 2 9 0 , 9 1 9 8 5 . 9 0 % 4 6 , 6 0 6 MU B S O v e r t i m e W a g e s 2, 8 0 4 0 7 0 1 5 4 2 , 6 5 0 9 4 . 5 2 % 1 , 8 6 0 MU B S F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 26 , 1 2 1 0 1 , 7 0 4 3 , 4 3 8 2 2 , 6 8 4 8 6 . 8 3 % 3 , 4 6 0 MU B S P E R S I 40 , 7 7 0 0 2 , 6 8 9 5 , 4 2 1 3 5 , 3 4 9 8 6 . 7 0 % 5 , 4 8 6 MU B S W o r k e r s ' C o m p 1, 8 5 2 0 0 0 1 , 8 5 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 1 1 0 , 0 2 1 0 5, 9 0 6 11 , 8 1 2 98 , 2 0 9 89.26%11,622 MU B S T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 52 0 , 2 2 5 0 34 , 0 5 3 68 , 5 6 3 45 1 , 6 6 2 86.82%69,034 MU B S MU B S OP E R A T I N G C O S T S MU B S O f f i c e E x p e n s e 6, 5 0 0 0 7 3 4 1 , 0 9 7 5 , 4 0 3 8 3 . 1 2 % 1 , 2 1 6 MU B S C o p i e r E x p e n s e 5, 7 1 0 0 0 0 5 , 7 1 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 8 7 MU B S E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S D a t a A c c e s s E x p e n s e 1 , 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 3 0 , 5 9 0 0 0 3 0 , 5 9 8 (8 ) (0.02)% 30,560 MU B S M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 1 6 , 0 5 0 0 7 0 7 8 0 7 1 5 , 2 4 3 9 4 . 9 7 % 1 , 3 3 5 MU B S E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 1 , 2 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 2 , 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 7 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2 , 5 5 0 0 0 0 2 , 5 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S L o c k b o x S e r v i c e s 2 2 , 6 0 0 0 1 , 7 8 4 3 , 5 5 7 1 9 , 0 4 3 8 4 . 2 6 % 3 , 1 2 4 MU B S I V R P h o n e S e r v i c e s 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 7 8 1 1 , 7 3 0 1 8 , 2 7 0 9 1 . 3 5 % 1 , 8 9 5 MU B S T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 4 5 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 2 6 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 3 6 1 4 1 , 0 3 8 2 1 8 , 9 6 2 8 4 . 2 1 % 4 2 , 0 9 0 MU B S B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 , 6 5 0 0 0 0 4 , 6 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 3 2 5 0 0 0 1 , 3 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 8 1 MU B S T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 , 3 2 5 0 0 0 1 , 3 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 1 0 MU B S T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 95 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 7 2 MU B S P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 4 , 3 0 5 5 , 6 9 5 5 6 . 9 4 % 4 , 8 1 3 MU B S I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 1 8 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 0 MU B S D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 12 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa g e 5 1 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 8 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual MU B S M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 1 0 (1 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 2 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 3 , 9 5 2 2 9 , 4 6 8 2 0 0 , 5 3 2 8 7 . 1 8 % 2 7 , 2 6 7 MU B S A / R W r i t e o f f s & L o s s 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 4, 5 3 1 8, 5 7 2 11 , 4 2 8 57.14%317 MU B S T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 64 5 , 5 9 0 (1 0 ) 42 , 8 4 9 12 1 , 1 7 2 52 4 , 4 0 8 81.23%115,116 MU B S MU B S Ca p i t a l O u t l a y MU B S C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 4 6 , 5 7 3 0 0 0 46 , 5 7 3 100.00%21,363 MU B S T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 46 , 5 7 3 0 0 0 46 , 5 7 3 100.00%21,363 MU B S MU B S DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 2 1 2 , 3 8 8 (1 0 ) 76 , 9 0 2 18 9 , 7 3 5 1, 0 2 2 , 6 4 3 84.35%205,514 MU B S MU B S TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 2 1 2 , 3 8 8 (1 0 ) 76 , 9 0 2 18 9 , 7 3 5 1, 0 2 2 , 6 4 3 84.35%205,514 MU B S Pa g e 5 2 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 6 9 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r 3 4 0 0 - W a t e r D e p a r t m e n t Wa t e r RE V E N U E S Wa t e r D e p t S v c F e e s 25 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 2 , 4 1 8 5 1 , 2 4 3 1 9 8 , 7 5 7 7 9 . 5 0 % 3 7 , 0 3 5 Wa t e r R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 9 8 Wa t e r R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 0 2 , 5 2 0 (2 , 5 2 0 ) 0.00% 0 Wa t e r R e n t a l I n c o m e 20 , 0 0 0 0 7 , 6 3 5 1 6 , 2 1 9 3 , 7 8 1 1 8 . 9 0 % 1 7 , 1 7 7 Wa t e r W a t e r / S e w e r S a l e s R e v e n u e 8 , 9 4 3 , 1 5 1 0 5 8 3 , 6 4 4 1 , 2 8 5 , 2 2 5 7 , 6 5 7 , 9 2 6 8 5 . 6 2 % 1 , 3 1 4 , 5 1 7 Wa t e r M e t e r / E q u i p S a l e s R e v e n u e s 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 6 1 , 8 7 4 1 2 1 , 3 0 7 7 8 , 6 9 3 3 9 . 3 4 % 7 0 , 0 3 3 Wa t e r S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 1, 1 8 2 1, 1 8 2 (1 , 1 8 2 ) 0.00%0 Wa t e r T o t a l R E V E N U E S 9, 4 1 3 , 1 5 1 0 67 6 , 7 5 3 1, 4 7 7 , 6 9 5 7, 9 3 5 , 4 5 6 84.30%1,438,960 Wa t e r Wa t e r PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Wa t e r W a g e s 1, 2 3 1 , 5 3 2 0 9 4 , 3 4 8 1 9 0 , 5 0 2 1 , 0 4 1 , 0 3 0 8 4 . 5 3 % 1 6 7 , 6 1 6 Wa t e r O v e r t i m e W a g e s 32 , 8 9 3 0 1 , 9 2 9 4 , 2 0 1 2 8 , 6 9 2 8 7 . 2 2 % 7 , 5 7 7 Wa t e r F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 96 , 7 2 8 0 6 , 8 9 7 1 3 , 9 5 9 8 2 , 7 6 9 8 5 . 5 6 % 1 2 , 5 6 3 Wa t e r P E R S I 15 0 , 6 5 9 0 1 0 , 8 9 9 2 1 , 9 1 0 1 2 8 , 7 5 0 8 5 . 4 5 % 1 9 , 2 9 8 Wa t e r W o r k e r s ' C o m p 44 , 9 1 5 0 0 0 4 4 , 9 1 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 3 9 0 , 7 5 4 0 29 , 0 8 2 58 , 1 6 7 33 2 , 5 8 7 85.11%50,186 Wa t e r T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 , 9 4 7 , 4 8 1 0 14 3 , 1 5 5 28 8 , 7 3 9 1, 6 5 8 , 7 4 2 85.17%257,241 Wa t e r Wa t e r OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Wa t e r O f f i c e E x p e n s e 8, 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 9 0 6 7 , 0 9 4 8 8 . 6 7 % 1 , 1 2 8 Wa t e r C o p i e r E x p e n s e 6, 8 1 4 0 3 7 8 3 7 8 6 , 4 3 5 9 4 . 4 4 % 0 Wa t e r E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 , 5 6 0 0 0 0 1 , 5 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 3 1 Wa t e r C h e m i c a l s 90 , 0 0 0 0 6 , 4 2 7 1 3 , 2 0 0 7 6 , 8 0 0 8 5 . 3 3 % 7 , 0 0 6 Wa t e r J a n i t o r i a l 8, 7 0 0 0 3 5 8 7 1 6 7 , 9 8 4 9 1 . 7 7 % 4 4 6 Wa t e r S a f e t y E x p e n s e 10 , 6 0 3 0 9 0 5 1 , 8 8 8 8 , 7 1 5 8 2 . 1 9 % 1 , 7 4 4 Wa t e r S h o p S u p p l i e s 7, 0 0 0 0 2 7 8 4 6 4 6 , 5 3 6 9 3 . 3 6 % 1 , 1 9 2 Wa t e r F u e l s - G a s 47 , 6 2 0 0 0 0 4 7 , 6 2 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 0 7 4 Wa t e r F u e l s - D i e s e l / P r o p a n e 3 , 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 4 , 8 5 0 0 6 9 1 , 8 5 6 2 , 9 9 4 6 1 . 7 3 % 5 6 8 Wa t e r M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 30 0 0 0 3 1 4 (1 4 ) (4.57)% 0 Wa t e r W a t e r M e t e r s 45 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 9 , 6 8 0 1 0 3 , 7 6 3 3 4 6 , 2 3 7 7 6 . 9 4 % 3 1 5 Wa t e r B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 2 6 , 9 4 5 0 0 1 2 1 2 6 , 8 2 4 9 9 . 5 5 % 4 , 1 7 7 Wa t e r V e h i c l e R e p a i r 12 , 7 7 5 0 1 , 1 2 8 3 , 9 7 8 8 , 7 9 7 6 8 . 8 5 % 9 6 3 Wa t e r V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 3 , 2 7 5 0 4 2 2 9 6 1 2 , 9 7 9 9 7 . 7 7 % 3 , 4 0 1 Wa t e r E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 8 , 4 3 5 0 0 0 8 , 4 3 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r R o l l i n g S t o c k R e p a i r 3 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r R o l l i n g S t o c k M a i n t e n a n c e 3 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 4 6 2 , 3 5 4 6 7 . 2 5 % 0 Pa g e 5 3 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 7 0 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 3 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r L i n e W a t / S e w M a i n t e n a n c e 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 4 8 8 1 8 , 5 1 2 9 2 . 5 6 % 1 , 2 3 8 Wa t e r L i n e W a t / S e w R e p a i r 1 8 3 , 5 0 0 0 1 2 , 8 1 3 1 7 , 8 5 9 1 6 5 , 6 4 1 9 0 . 2 6 % 3 , 0 7 3 Wa t e r S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 3 , 3 7 7 0 0 1 6 , 5 8 5 3 6 , 7 9 2 6 8 . 9 2 % 1 6 , 7 3 7 Wa t e r A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 4 , 9 0 0 0 6 0 1 8 0 4 , 7 2 0 9 6 . 3 1 % 0 Wa t e r F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 8 1 , 0 0 0 0 4 , 3 0 0 1 3 , 7 5 5 6 7 , 2 4 5 8 3 . 0 1 % 8 , 5 2 2 Wa t e r W e l l M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 1 5 9 , 5 0 0 0 1 4 , 9 8 4 2 9 , 3 3 8 1 3 0 , 1 6 2 8 1 . 6 0 % 1 0 , 3 7 5 Wa t e r E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 4 , 8 4 4 9 6 . 8 8 % 4 1 0 Wa t e r S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 2 6 3 (2 6 3 ) 0.00% 0 Wa t e r F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 , 3 0 0 0 0 4 1 6 8 8 4 6 8 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 1 9 , 8 5 0 0 0 0 1 9 , 8 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 2 3 5 , 6 4 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 , 6 4 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 1 7 , 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 , 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 , 5 7 9 Wa t e r W a t e r T e s t i n g 14 3 , 6 5 5 0 2 , 4 8 0 3 , 9 2 0 1 3 9 , 7 3 5 9 7 . 2 7 % 5 , 1 0 2 Wa t e r D E Q W a t e r A s s e s s m e n t 1 0 1 , 8 5 5 0 0 1 0 1 , 2 1 4 6 4 1 0 . 6 2 % 9 7 , 1 3 4 Wa t e r C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 0 0 0 2 , 7 0 6 (2 , 7 0 6 ) 0.00% 0 Wa t e r W e l l A s s e s s m e n t / A b a n d o n m e n t 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 3 , 7 4 4 0 3 4 3 6 8 7 3 , 0 5 7 8 1 . 6 5 % 6 0 6 Wa t e r P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 2 , 8 7 9 0 1 2 5 1 2 5 1 2 , 7 5 3 9 9 . 0 2 % 4 4 5 Wa t e r P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 1 3 , 9 2 0 0 9 9 0 2 , 3 3 5 1 1 , 5 8 5 8 3 . 2 2 % 1 , 3 1 4 Wa t e r C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 5 , 4 3 2 0 1 , 1 5 8 2 , 1 0 5 1 3 , 3 2 7 8 6 . 3 5 % 2 , 1 2 7 Wa t e r B u s i n e s s M e a l s 30 0 0 0 2 0 2 8 0 9 3 . 3 2 % 3 1 Wa t e r M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 3 , 6 9 5 0 1 , 6 9 0 2 , 1 3 0 1 1 , 5 6 5 8 4 . 4 4 % 1 , 7 3 3 Wa t e r T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 4 , 8 2 0 0 4 9 8 4 9 8 4 , 3 2 2 8 9 . 6 7 % 0 Wa t e r T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 5 , 5 9 0 0 8 0 2 8 0 2 4 , 7 8 7 8 5 . 6 4 % 0 Wa t e r T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 3 , 1 0 0 0 2 8 8 2 8 8 2 , 8 1 2 9 0 . 7 1 % 0 Wa t e r A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 9 , 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 4 0 Wa t e r P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 8 , 8 7 4 0 5 5 1 9 4 8 , 6 8 0 9 7 . 8 1 % 3 0 1 Wa t e r I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 3 7 , 9 0 5 0 (4 , 9 1 1 ) 12 , 0 6 1 2 5 , 8 4 4 6 8 . 1 8 % 1 6 , 1 1 6 Wa t e r E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 4 1 3 , 2 2 8 0 2 8 , 2 7 3 6 1 , 9 6 8 3 5 1 , 2 6 0 8 5 . 0 0 % 5 5 , 1 3 3 Wa t e r I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 1 2 , 0 0 0 0 2 5 9 4 0 6 1 1 , 5 9 4 9 6 . 6 1 % 2 9 4 Wa t e r S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 6 Wa t e r E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 1 0 , 6 7 4 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 8 0 9 , 5 9 4 8 9 . 8 8 % 4 8 3 Wa t e r I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 4 , 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 3 , 2 7 4 7 2 6 1 8 . 1 4 % 3 , 3 4 0 Wa t e r H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 39 0 0 0 0 3 9 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 1 0 (1 0 ) 0 0 0 0.00%0 Wa t e r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2 , 3 6 4 , 6 1 5 (1 0 ) 13 5 , 2 5 2 40 4 , 8 8 1 1, 9 5 9 , 7 2 4 82.88%251,575 Pa g e 5 4 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 7 1 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r Wa t e r Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Wa t e r Wa t e r C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 2 0 8 , 0 0 0 0 6 3 6 3 2 0 7 , 9 3 7 9 9 . 9 6 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 5 3 , 3 7 9 0 0 8 , 0 5 1 4 5 , 3 2 8 8 4 . 9 1 % 9 , 8 8 9 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 9 3 , 5 7 0 0 0 0 9 3 , 5 7 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%7,843 Wa t e r T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 36 4 , 9 4 9 0 63 8, 1 1 4 35 6 , 8 3 5 97.78%17,732 Wa t e r Wa t e r DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 4, 6 7 7 , 0 4 5 (1 0 ) 27 8 , 4 7 1 70 1 , 7 3 4 3, 9 7 5 , 3 0 1 84.99%526,548 Wa t e r Wa t e r Tr a n s f e r s Wa t e r P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 9 1 3 , 6 5 9 0 7 3 , 1 0 7 1 4 3 , 8 3 0 7 6 9 , 8 2 9 8 4 . 2 5 % 1 3 7 , 0 8 1 Wa t e r O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 3 4 5 , 2 5 7 0 8, 8 3 0 29 , 5 0 3 31 5 , 7 5 4 91.45%27,138 Wa t e r T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 1, 2 5 8 , 9 1 5 0 81 , 9 3 7 17 3 , 3 3 2 1, 0 8 5 , 5 8 3 86.23%164,219 Wa t e r Wa t e r TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 5, 9 3 5 , 9 6 1 (1 0 ) 36 0 , 4 0 8 87 5 , 0 6 7 5, 0 6 0 , 8 8 4 85.25%690,767 Wa t e r Pa g e 5 5 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 7 2 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r 3 4 9 0 - W a t e r C o n s t r u c t i o n Wa t e r RE V E N U E S Wa t e r A s s e s s m e n t s - R e s i d e n t i a l R e v e n u e 3 , 1 2 6 , 8 0 2 0 2 6 4 , 3 8 2 5 8 7 , 9 5 4 2 , 5 3 8 , 8 4 8 8 1 . 1 9 % 4 1 7 , 9 1 8 Wa t e r A s s e s s m e n t s - C o m m e r c i a l R e v e n u e 2 9 4 , 0 0 0 0 2 7 , 0 2 6 1 1 2 , 1 0 6 1 8 1 , 8 9 4 6 1 . 8 6 % 1 1 8 , 8 3 6 Wa t e r A s s e s s m e n t s - M u l t i f a m i l y R e v e n u e 1 3 6 , 7 0 3 0 1 4 9 , 9 4 8 4 3 4 , 0 6 0 (2 9 7 , 3 5 7 ) (217.52)% 118,296 Wa t e r I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 1, 0 0 9 24 , 3 7 6 12 5 , 6 2 4 83.74%31,693 Wa t e r T o t a l R E V E N U E S 3, 7 0 7 , 5 0 5 0 44 2 , 3 6 5 1, 1 5 8 , 4 9 6 2, 5 4 9 , 0 0 9 68.75%686,743 Wa t e r Wa t e r OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Wa t e r I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 1 8 , 0 0 0 0 0 83 8 17 , 1 6 2 95.34%1,673 Wa t e r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 18 , 0 0 0 0 0 83 8 17 , 1 6 2 95.35%1,673 Wa t e r Wa t e r Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Wa t e r C a p i t a l O u t l a y - L a n d 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 3 , 4 2 5 Wa t e r C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r B u i l d i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s 2 2 , 4 0 8 0 0 0 2 2 , 4 0 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 5 7 4 , 2 1 9 0 1 2 , 7 1 9 1 2 , 7 1 9 5 6 1 , 5 0 0 9 7 . 7 8 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - C o m m u n i c a t i o n E q u i p m e n t 8 3 , 6 4 1 0 0 0 8 3 , 6 4 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r S e r v i c e L i n e / M a i n R e p l a c e m e n t 1 , 6 5 3 , 8 2 4 0 2 , 3 6 3 5 , 0 6 3 1 , 6 4 8 , 7 6 1 9 9 . 6 9 % 9 9 , 4 2 6 Wa t e r W e l l # 1 5 31 2 , 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 , 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r W e l l 2 9 c o n s t r u c t i o n 8 5 4 , 6 4 2 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 1 3 , 2 3 1 3 3 4 , 0 3 8 5 4 0 , 6 0 4 6 1 . 8 0 % 1 5 , 4 8 8 Wa t e r W e l l # 2 2 C o n s t r u c t i o n 1 , 6 5 4 , 6 0 8 0 4 1 , 8 6 1 4 1 , 8 6 1 1 , 6 1 2 , 7 4 7 9 7 . 4 7 % 1 , 9 4 4 Wa t e r W e l l # 3 0 77 7 , 3 6 8 0 1 4 9 , 5 1 2 3 1 9 , 1 3 0 4 5 8 , 2 3 8 5 8 . 9 4 % 6 , 0 5 0 Wa t e r W A T E R L I N E E X T E N S I O N S 4 , 2 0 0 , 3 4 0 0 5 , 3 6 6 2 4 5 , 4 3 4 3 , 9 5 4 , 9 0 5 9 4 . 1 5 % 3 5 , 3 0 8 Wa t e r W e l l # 2 7 c o n s t r u c t i o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 7 , 3 5 2 Wa t e r W e l l # 2 8 c o n s t r u c t i o n 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 6 , 7 9 4 6 , 7 9 4 7 9 3 , 2 0 6 9 9 . 1 5 % 0 Wa t e r W e l l # 3 2 c a p i t a l 1 , 0 2 8 , 3 7 1 0 0 0 1 , 0 2 8 , 3 7 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 9 2 9 Wa t e r W e l l # 3 3 C a p i t a l 4 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 100.00%0 Wa t e r T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 1 2 , 5 1 1 , 6 2 0 20 , 0 0 0 33 1 , 8 4 6 96 5 , 0 4 0 11 , 5 6 6 , 5 8 1 92.30%260,921 Wa t e r Wa t e r DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 12 , 5 2 9 , 6 2 0 20 , 0 0 0 33 1 , 8 4 6 96 5 , 8 7 8 11 , 5 8 3 , 7 4 3 92.30%262,594 Wa t e r Wa t e r Wa t e r TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 12 , 5 2 9 , 6 2 0 20 , 0 0 0 33 1 , 8 4 6 96 5 , 8 7 8 11 , 5 8 3 , 7 4 3 92.30%262,594 Wa t e r Pa g e 5 6 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 7 3 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW 3 5 0 0 - W a s t e W a t e r F a c i l i t y WW RE V E N U E S WW R e v i e w F e e s 0 0 1 , 0 5 0 2 , 9 2 5 (2 , 9 2 5 ) 0.00% 2,100 WW W a t e r / S e w e r S a l e s R e v e n u e 1 5 , 2 1 4 , 3 9 0 0 1 , 2 1 1 , 7 3 8 2 , 4 0 8 , 2 3 0 1 2 , 8 0 6 , 1 6 0 8 4 . 1 7 % 2 , 3 4 3 , 8 2 7 WW M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%2,849 WW T o t a l R E V E N U E S 15 , 2 1 4 , 3 9 0 0 1, 2 1 2 , 7 8 8 2, 4 1 1 , 1 5 5 12 , 8 0 3 , 2 3 5 84.15%2,348,776 WW WW PE R S O N N E L C O S T S WW W a g e s 1, 8 5 6 , 5 6 9 0 1 4 3 , 1 8 7 2 8 3 , 2 2 1 1 , 5 7 3 , 3 4 8 8 4 . 7 4 % 2 7 0 , 5 3 2 WW O v e r t i m e W a g e s 49 , 9 9 8 0 3 , 8 1 8 7 , 1 1 8 4 2 , 8 8 0 8 5 . 7 6 % 9 , 4 6 9 WW F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 14 5 , 8 5 2 0 1 0 , 6 9 2 2 1 , 0 9 4 1 2 4 , 7 5 8 8 5 . 5 3 % 2 0 , 4 6 2 WW P E R S I 22 7 , 3 8 7 0 1 6 , 6 4 1 3 2 , 8 5 5 1 9 4 , 5 3 2 8 5 . 5 5 % 3 1 , 6 9 6 WW W o r k e r s ' C o m p 56 , 9 9 3 0 0 0 5 6 , 9 9 3 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 5 8 6 , 1 3 1 0 35 , 8 4 6 73 , 1 3 8 51 2 , 9 9 3 87.52%68,690 WW T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 2 , 9 2 2 , 9 3 0 0 21 0 , 1 8 4 41 7 , 4 2 6 2, 5 0 5 , 5 0 4 85.72%400,848 WW WW OP E R A T I N G C O S T S WW O f f i c e E x p e n s e 6, 6 5 0 0 1 0 7 2 5 5 6 , 3 9 5 9 6 . 1 6 % 5 , 1 1 5 WW C o p i e r E x p e n s e 23 , 0 1 4 0 1 , 3 3 6 1 , 7 6 7 2 1 , 2 4 7 9 2 . 3 2 % 1 , 8 7 0 WW E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 2 , 3 4 0 0 0 1 4 2 , 3 2 6 9 9 . 4 0 % 1 4 3 WW C h e m i c a l s 45 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 6 4 0 3 8 , 7 6 6 4 1 1 , 2 3 4 9 1 . 3 8 % 5 4 , 3 4 4 WW J a n i t o r i a l 25 , 1 0 0 0 1 , 8 4 3 3 , 2 3 8 2 1 , 8 6 2 8 7 . 0 9 % 1 , 3 1 8 WW S a f e t y E x p e n s e 31 , 6 5 0 0 3 , 2 1 2 3 , 5 1 2 2 8 , 1 3 8 8 8 . 9 0 % 5 , 0 3 9 WW S h o p S u p p l i e s 69 , 1 5 0 0 4 , 7 9 9 7 , 7 4 1 6 1 , 4 0 9 8 8 . 8 0 % 9 , 3 9 7 WW F u e l s - G a s 15 , 3 5 0 0 0 0 1 5 , 3 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 4 0 0 WW F u e l s - D i e s e l / P r o p a n e 2 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 2 3 , 9 3 4 9 9 . 7 2 % 7 3 WW C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 7 , 3 5 0 0 1 , 1 0 3 1 , 3 3 7 6 , 0 1 3 8 1 . 8 0 % 1 , 3 9 8 WW M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 7 3 9 7 3 . 8 5 % 2 0 3 WW C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 6 3 , 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 , 8 5 3 5 2 , 1 4 7 8 2 . 7 7 % 5 , 0 8 0 WW P l a n t M a i n t e n a n c e 3 9 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 3 9 9 1 4 , 2 8 7 3 7 5 , 7 1 3 9 6 . 3 3 % 4 6 , 8 1 7 WW P l a n t R e p a i r s 15 0 , 0 0 0 0 4 , 2 0 7 1 0 , 6 2 5 1 3 9 , 3 7 5 9 2 . 9 1 % 6 , 0 7 6 WW P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW V e h i c l e R e p a i r 24 , 6 0 0 0 6 8 8 5 , 4 7 2 1 9 , 1 2 8 7 7 . 7 5 % 1 2 , 2 9 1 WW V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 4 , 4 0 0 0 7 7 3 1 , 3 5 9 2 3 , 0 4 1 9 4 . 4 3 % 8 , 2 1 7 WW E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 7 1 , 0 0 0 0 2 6 , 1 4 3 4 1 , 1 6 3 2 9 , 8 3 7 4 2 . 0 2 % 1 4 , 0 8 4 WW R o l l i n g S t o c k R e p a i r 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 9 , 7 4 9 9 7 . 4 9 % (364) WW R o l l i n g S t o c k M a i n t e n a n c e 8 , 5 0 0 0 0 7 6 4 7 , 7 3 6 9 1 . 0 1 % 8 1 9 WW G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 9 3 3 1 4 , 0 6 7 9 3 . 7 8 % 3 1 2 Pa g e 5 7 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 7 4 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW L i f t S t a t i o n M a i n t 5 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 7 0 4 , 0 3 0 5 0 , 9 7 0 9 2 . 6 7 % 1 7 , 4 7 3 WW L i f t S t a t i o n R e p a i r 3 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 5 3 4 , 9 8 5 9 9 . 9 5 % 2 , 8 4 4 WW L i n e W a t / S e w M a i n t e n a n c e 2 7 , 3 2 0 0 0 6 3 7 2 6 , 6 8 3 9 7 . 6 6 % 5 6 7 WW L i n e W a t / S e w R e p a i r 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 8 6 0 1 7 1 , 1 4 0 9 7 . 7 9 % 0 WW S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 6 , 3 6 9 0 0 4 , 8 5 8 5 1 , 5 1 1 9 1 . 3 8 % 2 7 , 9 9 1 WW A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 3 , 1 5 0 0 4 6 1 3 7 3 , 0 1 3 9 5 . 6 3 % 0 WW F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 1 5 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 6 , 5 6 6 1 3 , 2 8 2 1 4 8 , 2 1 8 9 1 . 7 7 % 9 , 8 4 1 WW E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1 1 , 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 , 2 3 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 4 3 3 WW F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2 2 , 5 8 0 0 0 0 2 2 , 5 8 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 2 2 9 , 3 6 2 0 9 3 0 9 3 0 2 2 8 , 4 3 2 9 9 . 5 9 % 1 5 , 7 4 3 WW C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW P r e v e n t a t i v e H e a l t h E x p 1 , 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 8 4 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 1 3 5 2 , 1 3 5 8 1 , 8 6 6 9 7 . 4 5 % 2 , 4 7 6 WW T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 7 , 0 5 0 0 3 0 9 6 1 8 6 , 4 3 2 9 1 . 2 3 % 6 2 4 WW P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 4 , 3 0 0 0 1 , 6 0 8 2 , 2 1 8 1 2 , 0 8 2 8 4 . 4 9 % 2 8 9 WW P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 , 5 2 0 0 7 9 1 2 7 2 , 3 9 3 9 4 . 9 7 % 7 1 WW C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 4 , 7 8 0 0 8 2 2 1 , 7 3 1 1 3 , 0 4 9 8 8 . 2 8 % 1 , 6 0 4 WW B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 5 7 4 3 4 3 . 1 3 % 0 WW E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 3 4 , 7 0 0 0 2 9 9 3 , 9 5 3 3 0 , 7 4 7 8 8 . 6 0 % 7 , 7 0 3 WW T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 9 3 2 1 0 , 5 6 8 9 1 . 8 9 % 1 1 9 WW T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 4 , 2 5 0 0 0 2 , 2 0 5 1 2 , 0 4 5 8 4 . 5 2 % 7 9 4 WW T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 4 , 6 2 5 0 0 6 4 9 3 , 9 7 6 8 5 . 9 6 % 4 1 3 WW A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 5 , 5 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 8 1 , 5 0 8 3 , 9 9 2 7 2 . 5 8 % 0 WW P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 1 , 2 8 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 8 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 4 8 , 2 4 3 0 0 2 1 , 5 4 0 2 6 , 7 0 2 5 5 . 3 5 % 2 0 , 5 1 1 WW E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 5 5 4 , 5 3 8 0 4 9 , 2 2 9 9 7 , 0 5 4 4 5 7 , 4 8 4 8 2 . 4 9 % 7 6 , 6 0 6 WW I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 7 9 , 5 0 0 0 4 , 8 8 7 6 , 2 2 2 7 3 , 2 7 8 9 2 . 1 7 % 4 , 4 9 9 WW S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 1 4 5 , 7 5 0 0 8 , 2 5 4 2 2 , 0 2 3 1 2 3 , 7 2 7 8 4 . 8 8 % 1 9 , 2 7 3 WW E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 1 0 , 7 4 6 0 0 6 1 1 0 , 6 8 5 9 9 . 4 2 % 5 9 WW D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 5 , 9 2 4 0 2 0 4 2 9 4 5 , 6 3 0 9 5 . 0 3 % 3 4 3 WW I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 5 6 0 4 4 0 1 0 . 9 9 % 3 , 5 9 1 WW H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 58 5 0 0 0 5 8 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 1 0 (1 0 ) 0 0 0 0.00%0 WW T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 3 , 2 3 7 , 4 6 6 9, 9 9 0 13 0 , 6 0 2 33 7 , 2 9 8 2, 9 1 0 , 1 5 8 89.61%388,498 WW Pa g e 5 8 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 7 5 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW Ca p i t a l O u t l a y WW C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 4 6 , 7 7 9 0 0 0 4 6 , 7 7 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 0 WW C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 9 5 , 0 0 0 (1 0 , 0 0 0 ) 9, 3 4 6 9, 3 4 6 75 , 6 5 4 89.00%0 WW T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 14 1 , 7 7 9 (1 0 , 0 0 0 ) 9, 3 4 6 9, 3 4 6 12 2 , 4 3 3 92.91%100 WW WW DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 6, 3 0 2 , 1 7 5 (1 0 ) 35 0 , 1 3 2 76 4 , 0 7 1 5, 5 3 8 , 0 9 4 87.87%789,446 WW WW WW Tr a n s f e r s WW P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 9 1 3 , 6 6 0 0 7 4 , 4 1 6 1 4 6 , 4 4 6 7 6 7 , 2 1 3 8 3 . 9 7 % 1 3 9 , 6 4 8 WW O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 3 4 5 , 2 5 7 0 8, 8 3 0 29 , 5 0 3 31 5 , 7 5 4 91.45%27,138 WW T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 1, 2 5 8 , 9 1 6 0 83 , 2 4 6 17 5 , 9 4 9 1, 0 8 2 , 9 6 7 86.02%166,786 WW WW TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 7, 5 6 1 , 0 9 1 (1 0 ) 43 3 , 3 7 9 94 0 , 0 2 0 6, 6 2 1 , 0 6 1 87.56%956,232 WW Pa g e 5 9 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 7 6 o f 4 7 5 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e E x p e n s e s Fr o m N o v 1 - N o v 3 0 , 2 0 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l Bu d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t Pe r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW 3 5 9 0 - W a s t e W a t e r C o n s t r u c t i o n WW RE V E N U E S WW A s s e s s m e n t s - R e s i d e n t i a l R e v e n u e 7 , 0 6 0 , 8 1 6 0 5 2 0 , 4 5 6 1 , 1 5 7 , 4 3 2 5 , 9 0 3 , 3 8 4 8 3 . 6 0 % 7 9 9 , 5 3 9 WW C a s h D o n a t i o n f o r C a p i t a l O u t l a y 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 0 , 4 3 1 WW E P A W W C o m p l i a n c e F e e 1 , 4 8 0 , 3 3 7 0 1 2 4 , 7 0 2 2 4 8 , 9 3 2 1 , 2 3 1 , 4 0 5 8 3 . 1 8 % 2 3 8 , 3 3 2 WW A s s e s s m e n t s - C o m m e r c i a l R e v e n u e 4 4 1 , 0 0 0 0 6 2 , 4 5 0 2 5 3 , 3 4 3 1 8 7 , 6 5 7 4 2 . 5 5 % 2 2 9 , 1 7 9 WW A s s e s s m e n t s - M u l t i f a m i l y R e v e n u e 9 8 , 0 0 0 0 2 9 5 , 1 8 4 8 5 4 , 4 8 0 (7 5 6 , 4 8 0 ) (771.91)% 225,845 WW I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 1, 0 0 9 46 , 6 6 8 53 , 3 3 2 53.33%62,336 WW T o t a l R E V E N U E S 9, 1 8 0 , 1 5 3 0 1, 0 0 3 , 8 0 1 2, 5 6 0 , 8 5 5 6, 6 1 9 , 2 9 8 72.10%1,575,662 WW WW OP E R A T I N G C O S T S WW I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 3 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 1, 6 7 6 33 , 3 2 4 95.21%3,346 WW T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 35 , 0 0 0 0 0 1, 6 7 6 33 , 3 2 4 95.21%3,346 WW WW Ca p i t a l O u t l a y WW W W T P - B l d g i m p r o v e m e n t s 2 , 7 5 6 , 9 6 9 7 7 , 5 0 0 3 6 , 0 1 8 3 6 , 4 3 8 2 , 7 9 8 , 0 3 1 9 8 . 7 1 % 0 WW S e w e r L i n e E x t e n s i o n s 5 , 7 8 9 , 4 6 4 0 2 , 9 2 2 1 0 , 3 4 3 5 , 7 7 9 , 1 2 2 9 9 . 8 2 % 3 3 , 1 8 5 WW C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 5 6 , 6 2 1 0 0 0 5 6 , 6 2 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 0 , 8 9 7 WW C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 3 6 , 2 5 0 0 0 0 3 6 , 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 1 1 3 , 7 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 3 , 7 3 3 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 0 5 7 WW S e r v i c e L i n e / M a i n R e p l a c e m e n t 3 , 0 9 3 , 7 3 5 0 8 , 0 0 3 7 , 2 5 2 3 , 0 8 6 , 4 8 4 9 9 . 7 6 % 2 8 , 9 8 6 WW L i f t S t a t i o n c o n s t r u c t i o n 8 1 , 5 8 8 0 0 0 8 1 , 5 8 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 1 0 7 WW P r e D e s i g n o f C a p i t a l P r o j e c t s 3 0 , 2 6 2 , 6 1 4 0 1 , 1 3 5 , 4 1 5 3 , 1 6 5 , 4 8 0 2 7 , 0 9 7 , 1 3 4 8 9 . 5 3 % 8 4 , 3 7 3 WW B o i s e R i v e r O u t f a l l 9 0 1 , 7 2 7 0 2 6 , 2 4 5 1 9 3 , 0 8 0 7 0 8 , 6 4 7 7 8 . 5 8 % 0 WW C e n t r a t e B a s i n C o n s t r u c t i o n 1 9 4 , 3 2 6 0 0 1 5 0 1 9 4 , 1 7 6 9 9 . 9 2 % 3 8 0 , 9 9 4 WW H e a d w o r k s I m p r o v e m e n t s 1 3 , 0 7 6 , 5 5 9 0 1 8 , 6 3 2 2 6 2 , 9 5 5 1 2 , 8 1 3 , 6 0 4 9 7 . 9 8 % 2 1 3 , 5 0 7 WW U l t r a v i o l e t D i s i n f e c t i o n 1 6 0 , 6 2 6 0 0 0 16 0 , 6 2 6 100.00%206,115 WW T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 5 6 , 5 2 4 , 2 1 4 77 , 5 0 0 1, 2 2 7 , 2 3 5 3, 6 7 5 , 6 9 8 52 , 9 2 6 , 0 1 7 93.51%1,041,222 WW WW DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 56 , 5 5 9 , 2 1 4 77 , 5 0 0 1, 2 2 7 , 2 3 5 3, 6 7 7 , 3 7 3 52 , 9 5 9 , 3 4 1 93.50%1,044,568 WW WW WW TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 56 , 5 5 9 , 2 1 4 77 , 5 0 0 1, 2 2 7 , 2 3 5 3, 6 7 7 , 3 7 3 52 , 9 5 9 , 3 4 1 93.50%1,044,568 Pa g e 6 0 o f 6 0 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 1 7 7 o f 4 7 5 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 41 Project/File Number: Item Title: AP Invoices for Payment - $422,885.48 Meetinq Notes En City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ACEM FY18 1st & 2nd Quarter ACEM Emer Mngt Executive Council Dues 4,593.63 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DR17-547, 15% of $204.97 on Pistol Sale, CR#30498 1/3/18 30.74 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS brake spring tool - qty 1 4.41 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS brake tool for trailer brake repairs - qty 1 5.05 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Checked Light Not Working, No Issue Found, 12/19/17 90.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Repaired Loose Snap in Fixture Starter -Pole 40897C 90.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lamp & Photo Cell on Pole 29349C, 12/19/17 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lamp & Photo Cell on Pole 29987, 12/19/17 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lamp & Photo Cell on Pole 40190C, 12/19/17 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lamp & Photo Cell on Pole 40193C, 12/19/17 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lamp & Photo Cell on Pole 40894C, 12/19/17 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lamp & Photo Cell on Pole 40934C, 12/18/17 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lamp, Ballast, Photo Cell on Pole 29350C, 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lamp, Ballast, Photo Cell on Pole 40679C, 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lamp, Ballast, PhotoCell, Fuse-Pole 29348C 238.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.18-0098, Replaced Lighting Materials on Pole 40191C 362.48 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.Damaged Pole replaced 51544C, 12/19/17 5,895.00 01 General Fund BME FIRE FIGHTER SUPPLY, LLC.220/ 200 flags for uniforms 148.00 01 General Fund BME FIRE FIGHTER SUPPLY, LLC.220/57 Class B shirts, stock 5,865.10 01 General Fund BME FIRE FIGHTER SUPPLY, LLC.220/Boots for J. Mentzer - Qty 1 Pair 159.00 01 General Fund BME FIRE FIGHTER SUPPLY, LLC.220/boots for J. Wheeler - Qty 1 Pair 304.40 01 General Fund BME FIRE FIGHTER SUPPLY, LLC.220/nameplates for uniforms - qty 6 63.29 01 General Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XPN547404, Additional Copies 11/22/17-12/21/17 146.77 01 General Fund BOISE FITNESS EQUIPMENT 220/Repair treadmill, St. 4, 12/1/17 347.40 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC.220/Janitorial, St. 1, cleaner, detergent, soap - qty 8 54.72 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC.220/Janitorial, St. 1, cleaner, liners, towels - qty 8 124.08 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC 220/Oil change, MF039 55.00 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 1Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 179 of 475 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Alignment for Unit # 158 53.96 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Differential Leak and Oil Change for Unit # 120 171.96 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC fleet truck 4 oil change and repairs - license C9767 1,300.98 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Install Hitch on New Code Enforcement Vehicle # 54 350.93 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change and Wipers for Unit # 23 67.60 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil change and Wipers for Unit # 3 74.71 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change for Unit # 26 55.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change for Unit #161 55.00 01 General Fund CENTURYLINK Home Court, PD DSL, Centrex Phone Lines, 12/17 872.12 01 General Fund CITY OF MERIDIAN PETTY CASH Reimburse Petty Cash December 2017 101.48 01 General Fund COMMERCIAL TIRE 220/4 new tires, MF027 1,096.96 01 General Fund CPP, INC MBTI Interpretive Report for Organizations - Qty 100 2,955.00 01 General Fund CRYSTAL RITCHIE Reimb, C. Ritchie, Jaycee Holman's Plaque Materials - Qty 3 17.17 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO Lamps exterior restroom lights for Heroes Park - qty 10 59.82 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO light lens cover for Lanark Parks Shop - qty 1 84.00 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO motion sensor for 8th Street Park - qty 3 373.94 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO photocontrol for 8th Street Park - qty 3 82.18 01 General Fund FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION Ventrac cutting edges - qty 12 292.95 01 General Fund FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION wear plates for 4 wheeler plow - qty 10 79.76 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY drill bit for Keith Bird Legacy Park hardware install x 1 17.54 01 General Fund HENDERSON WHEEL & SUPPLY bearings & seals for Trailmax trailer #4 - qty 20 124.88 01 General Fund HENDERSON WHEEL & SUPPLY brakes for Trailmax trailer - qty 1 31.64 01 General Fund HENDERSON WHEEL & SUPPLY brakes for Trailmax trailer repair - qty 3 94.92 01 General Fund HENDERSON WHEEL & SUPPLY seal for Trailmax trailer repair - qty 1 4.90 01 General Fund HENDERSON WHEEL & SUPPLY washers for Trailmax trailer repair - qty 4 6.30 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 8 Clamps for Training 7.92 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Credit for Cabinet Lock - Qty 1, See Inv# 1804 00008 58118 (5.47) 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES mounting tape & hose for Lanark Parks Shop - qty 5 18.30 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES painter tape & nails for Lanark Parks Shop - qty 2 34.57 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES sales tax reversal - reference invoice 6026517 (4.57) 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Sealant - Qty 1 5.97 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES shoe covers, brushes, liners-Kleiner restroom floor project 31.88 01 General Fund HSBC (COSTCO) BUSINESS SERVICE #7003-7319-1000-5018, Costco, December 2017 864.54 01 General Fund IDAHO ASSOC OF BUILDING OFFICIALS IDABO 2018 membership-Bjornson,Zahorka,Freckleton+PTs 265.00 01 General Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business Cards-Mike Enland-Structurral Inspector 46.25 01 General Fund IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY 18-0054, Animal Control Services - January 2018 31,761.00 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 2Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 180 of 475 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund IDAHO NURSERY ASSOCIATION Idaho Horticulture Expo 1/17-1/19/18-Boise x 6 797.50 01 General Fund IDAHO PARTY BARN Party Barn rental for MPR Staff Party on 12/22/17 250.00 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER CO WO# 27496789, Install 2in Riser to J-Box for Lights @ Ten Mi 2,707.00 01 General Fund IMPACT PEST SERVICES vole control at Ten Mile Interchange 250.00 01 General Fund JUMP TIME TWIN FALLS LLC Refund, Surety-2017-0143, Jump Time (Franklin Rd), Release o 62,694.50 01 General Fund L.N. CURTIS AND SONS 220/Boots for T. Rountree - Qty 1 Pair 269.02 01 General Fund L.N. CURTIS AND SONS 220/partial Credit Inv# INV126882, 2 hi-rise bundles returnd (302.40) 01 General Fund L.N. CURTIS AND SONS 220/Training, 2 Hi Rise bundles, 1 hose pack 485.81 01 General Fund LAURIE MCELROY instructor fee - Yoga 10/24-12/16/17 - qty 68 2,104.00 01 General Fund LS REFEREEING 18-0036 fall season 2017 basketball officials 12/1-12/20/17 926.50 01 General Fund LS REFEREEING winter season 2018 basketball officials set-up fee - qty 33 660.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC City#4, #0554, 12/31/17 Statement -1,925.05 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC City#7, #0778, 12/31/17 Statement -266.81 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Legal, #0802, 10/31/17 Statement -7.50 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Legal, #0802, 11/30/17 Statement -2.50 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Legal, #0802, 9/29/17 Statement -(20.99) 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Mayor#1, #0703, 12/31/17 Statement -12.50 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Mayor#3, #0729, 12/31/17 Statement -99.74 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks #3 6/28/17 Statement -204.86 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks #3, #0836, 08/29/17 Statement -227.05 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks #3, #0836, 11/30/17 Statement -260.44 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks #3, #4319, 4/27/17 Statement -(1,484.50) 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks #3, #4319, 5/28/17 Statement -416.49 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks#3, #4319, 7/28/17 Statement -269.87 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Clerks, #0521, 12/31/17 Statement 552.09 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Com-Dev, #0851, 12/31/17 Statement 2,041.40 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#2, #0745, 12/31/17 Statement 4,342.57 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#3, #0752, 12/31/17 Statement 1,281.42 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#4, #0760, 12/31/17 Statement 148.29 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#5, #0869, 12/31/17 Statement 1,277.55 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay HR, #0539, 12/31/17 Statement 1,120.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay IT, #0570, 12/31/17 Statement 6,568.04 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Legal, #0802, 12/31/17 Statement 334.35 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Mayor#2, #0711, 12/31/17 Statement 454.66 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Parks#1, #0844, 12/31/17 Statement 256.72 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 3Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 181 of 475 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Parks#2, #0828, 12/31/17 Statement 160.56 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Parks#3, #0836, 12/31/17 Statement 1,128.01 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#10, #7070, 12/31/17 Statement 643.08 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#11, #7088, 12/31/17 Statement 1,378.28 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#2, #0612, 12/31/17 Statement 5,678.12 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#4, #0638, 12/31/17 Statement 47.08 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#5, #0646, 12/31/17 Statement 197.53 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#8, #0679, 12/31/17 Statement 797.97 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#9, #7062, 12/31/17 Statement 67.05 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PD#1, #0604, 12/31/17 Statement -2.50 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PW#1, #0687, 12/31/17 Statement -280.77 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PW#2, #0695, 12/31/17 Statement -66.60 01 General Fund MCDOWELLS SPECIALTY REPAIRS Tint on New Code Enforcement Vehicle # 54 129.00 01 General Fund MEDIA PARTNERS CORPORATION BEST Training Material Videos - Qty 4 2,022.01 01 General Fund MERIDIAN CHAMBER of COMMERCE Membership Dues, City of Meridian, 1/1/18-12/31/18 675.00 01 General Fund MIKE MYERS Reimb, M. Myers, Hooks Removed & Eyelets Installed on Statio 35.00 01 General Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS 220/Antifreeze, qty 6 79.62 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.220/Chart tape - Qty 2 Rolls 14.78 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.220/Copy Paper - Qty 1 Case 31.49 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.220/labels - qty 1 Pk 9.79 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.220/Linen Paper - Qty 1 Pk 9.99 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.220/velcro fasteners - qty 1 7.27 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Booklet Envelopes - Qty 1 Box 18.88 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Copy Paper - Qty 1 Case 28.55 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Copy Paper for Newsletters - Qty 4 Cases 114.20 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Evidence bags - Qty 1 Case 81.89 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.File frames for desks in basement Facilities - Qty 4 Boxes 20.92 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.poster boards for Comp Plan - Qty 2 20.40 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Rulers, manila file folders, hanging folder,copy paper-qty 5 8.46 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Floor Heaters for PD Admin - Qty 4 352.76 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Office Chair for Lt. Colaianni - Qty 1 200.00 01 General Fund OHD, INC.220/Calibration of Fit Tester 790.00 01 General Fund Porter Lee Corporation Annual Software Support (January 2018-December 2018) 1,068.00 01 General Fund RANDY S LATTIMER instructor fee - Line Dancing 12/3-12/17/17 - qty 30 360.00 01 General Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT POSTAGE USE, December 2017 1,998.14 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 4Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 182 of 475 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86173707, Copier Lease 1/18 & Additional Copies 11/29-12/28 584.74 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86216992 Copier & C86216993 Copier for PD - CAU & Admin 3,946.08 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0034, backflow and wet testing Firestation #5 128.80 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0034, backflow inspection firestation #3 128.80 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0034, Backflow testing firestation #4 128.80 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0034, quarterly test and inspection City Hall Dec 2017 158.83 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0034, test and inspection , Sept 2017 152.07 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0034, Test and inspection Fire station #2 128.80 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0034, Test backflow Firestation #1 128.80 01 General Fund SLHS SERVICE AREA Pre Employment Testing - C. LeFave 68.00 01 General Fund SLHS SERVICE AREA Pre Employment Testing - R. Young 68.00 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/Coolant for MF041 16.83 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF021, T-31, Prev Mtnc.1,025.78 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF035, Failed Battery 418.45 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/Prev Mtnc on MF019 1,017.34 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/T-31, repair, regular gas added to diesel engine 883.67 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/T-31, Repairs, missing lug nuts, coolant leak,5,799.41 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Meridian Cost Share per the Maintenance JPA for Manager Plus 4,860.00 01 General Fund STOP STICK, LTD.Stop Sticks for New Patrol Units # 103 & 104 930.00 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 220/Blackout curtains & rods for St. 5, 4 sets 108.88 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP 220/20 Uniform Beanies 190.00 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP 220/clothing, stock, 75 tshirts, 40 hats 1,949.25 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP 220/Embroider 11 pieces furnished stock, uniforms 137.50 01 General Fund TAMMY DEWEERD Mayor Cellphone Reimbursement FY18 - January 2018 100.00 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)mini skid rentals for snow removal 11/21-12/19/17 3,955.00 01 General Fund THE ACTIVITY GROUP Trauma Kits - Qty 12 1,920.00 01 General Fund TODD BANTA staff shirts - qty 18 286.00 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR New Hire Clothing & Gear for C. LeFave - Qty 16 679.57 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR New Hire Clothing & Gear for R. Young - Qty 19 800.82 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR Uniform Equipment & Gear for N. Kotanjian - Qty 22 1,016.30 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 5Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 183 of 475 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 18-0015, UPRR - South Parking Lot Lease FY18 - January 2018 1,743.41 01 General Fund VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 18-0013 - Janitorial Services - December 2017 16,110.74 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00001 Data, 11/21/17-12/20/17 1,137.25 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00002 Cellphones - 11/21/17-12/20/17 7,193.85 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00003 Mobile Devices - 11/21/17-12/20/17 153.37 01 General Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 220/2 pair structure boots 802.91 01 General Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 220/300' of 1in tubular orange webbing, turnouts 148.23 01 General Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 220/6 turnout helmet hoods & 1 pr boots 558.43 01 General Fund WW GRAINGER, INC 220/Equipment, T-31, 2 angle protractors 31.26 Total 01 General Fund 230,510.17 20 Grant Fund governmental BEFORE THE MOVIE, INC.MADC Safe Holiday On-Screen Advertising - Dec 2017-Jan 2018 1,098.00 20 Grant Fund governmental BEFORE THE MOVIE, INC.MADC Safe Holiday On-Screen Advertising - Nov-Dec 2017 1,623.00 20 Grant Fund governmental MONTE STILES, LLC 18-0049, MADC Policy Advocacy Consulting - November 2017 1,250.00 20 Grant Fund governmental MONTE STILES, LLC 18-0049, MADC Policy Consultant Services - Oct 2017 1,250.00 20 Grant Fund governmental NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION CDBG Membership Dues, C. Pope, 12/1/17-6/30/18 470.00 20 Grant Fund governmental NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Registration, C. Pope, NCDA Winter Legislative Meeting, Wash 500.00 20 Grant Fund governmental RESERVE ACCOUNT POSTAGE USE, December 2017 87.46 Total 20 Grant Fund governmental 6,278.46 60 Enterprise Fund ACEM FY18 1st & 2nd Quarter ACEM Emer Mngt Executive Council Dues 4,593.62 60 Enterprise Fund ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC.Water Testing Well 16 & Well 20B Qty 9 3,629.95 60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment Cyan Toner HP LJ 4700 Qty 1 121.80 60 Enterprise Fund BUREAU OF OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE License Application Fee, License Fee, Exam Fee for D. Heaton 92.00 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 6Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 184 of 475 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund BUSINESS MANAGEMENT DAILY Admin Prof Today Subscription 1 Yr Renewal, #43606603, PW 101.00 60 Enterprise Fund BUTLER ACTUATOR SERVICES, LLC Labor to repair actuators at aeration basins 1,2 & 4;950.00 60 Enterprise Fund CAREER UNIFORMS Jacket with Logo, Shirt with Logo Embrod, D. Teller Qty 2 58.85 60 Enterprise Fund CAREER UNIFORMS Logo Embrod on Sweatshirt T Parrish 5.95 60 Enterprise Fund CENTURYLINK Home Court, PD DSL, Centrex Phone Lines, 12/17 652.46 60 Enterprise Fund CITY OF MERIDIAN PETTY CASH Reimburse Petty Cash December 2017 101.76 60 Enterprise Fund CLINT WORTHINGTON Reimb, C. Worthington, PE Lic# P-12527 Renewal 100.00 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Bibs for Dinae Edwards, working outside at WRRF - qty 1 59.99 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Clear gloves plus 12V pump, hose shank, port fittings &133.59 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Coverall, 25ft Steel 4 Measure Tape Qty 2 135.98 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Extend Handle Trowel Qty 1 12.99 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY High Vis Sweatshirt C. Cassel Qty 1 74.99 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Hooded Sweatshirt, Safety High Vis Bib Overalls, Hgh Vis JKT 234.97 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Safety Boots for L. Davis - Qty 1 125.99 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Screwdriver set plus PVC threaded cap & hose barb elbow for 7.47 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Sealed Container for Padlocks Qty 2 29.98 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Torch Kit Qty 1 49.99 60 Enterprise Fund DALE BOLTHOUSE Per Diem, D. Bolthouse, Senior Leadership Team Retreat, Smit 76.50 60 Enterprise Fund ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION Manhole cover cushion - Qty 2 Cases 613.74 60 Enterprise Fund EXECUTRAIN OF IDAHO Registration, M. Hoyt, 2 Excel Classes, Boise ID, 1/19 &1/30 300.00 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Meters, Brass Hex Nut 5/8inch Qty 200 220.00 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.12.5 Measuring Wheel Qty 1 208.87 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Bushing, coupling, nipple to repair leaking valve@S. Black C 70.81 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.PVC Coup, PVC Adpt, PVC Prmr, Blue Cmnt, PE Pipe Qty 26 115.41 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.PVC S80 PE pipe for chlorine analyzer at Reuse booster-qty20 8.81 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.PVC Slip Bush, PVC SXS Coup Qty 2 3.36 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Raptor Adjustable Hydrant Wrench Qty 1 44.45 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.T-Plus Pipe Compund Qty 2 44.50 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Bottles for metals analysis sampling (1 cs)578.99 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 7Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 185 of 475 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC FIA reagent - qty 1 296.00 60 Enterprise Fund GRANITE EXCAVATION, INC 17-0203,18-0168,Sewer Main Rep,E.Wash/Carlton to 12/20/17 10,868.23 60 Enterprise Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY 6inch Curb Box Key Hydrant Wrench Qty 1 32.16 60 Enterprise Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Hose Nozzle for Pacer Waterous Hydrant Qty 1 112.12 60 Enterprise Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Insert SS Stiffner Ford Brand Qty 24 36.48 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Pole extension 357.69 60 Enterprise Fund HAZEL ASPHALT, LLC 14X4 Asphalt Patch 1137 NW 12th Ave 750.00 60 Enterprise Fund HAZEL ASPHALT, LLC Asphalt Patch 937 W Yost St 750.00 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Butt Splice Heat Shrink Kit, Connector Qty 5 30.63 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Credit for Tax Charged on Inv# 18040270827 (1.74) 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Refund due to sale tax charge (84.77) 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Wet/dry vacuum 79.97 60 Enterprise Fund HSBC (COSTCO) BUSINESS SERVICE #7003-7319-1000-5018, Costco, December 2017 389.16 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2202131047, WWTP Power - December 2017 45,314.41 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2204228288, Water Power - December 2017 27,726.83 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2205167097 WWTP Power - Liftstations - December 2017 3,568.84 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT License Plate Renewal Vehicle Lic# A10843, Vactron Trailer 23.00 60 Enterprise Fund INFOR PUBLIC SECTOR 18-0135 Hansen 8 Asset Management Maint - 3/1/18-2/28/19 40,736.28 60 Enterprise Fund INTERSTATE ELECTRIC SUPPLY Expansion couplings to install new vaughn pumps-qty 6 83.29 60 Enterprise Fund IRMINGER CONSTRUCTION 17-0339,Well 30, as of 12/20/17 10,604.38 60 Enterprise Fund KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES High power v-belt - qty 3 45.81 60 Enterprise Fund KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES High power v-belt for stock - qty 2 24.56 60 Enterprise Fund KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES High power v-belts for HVAC monthly maintenance in Lab-qty 6 73.44 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC City#4, #0554, 12/31/17 Statement -93.48 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Water, #0547, 12/31/17 Statement 665.16 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay WW, #0596, 12/31/17 Statement 1,715.13 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC PW#1, #0687, 12/31/17 Statement -215.00 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC PW#2, #0695, 12/31/17 Statement -2,783.50 60 Enterprise Fund METROQUIP, INC.Blue PVC Galv, Hex Bushing, MCam, Fcam FIP Qty 32 131.76 60 Enterprise Fund MIDPOINT BEARING SPS bearing for 5yr maintenance on pump 3 at secondary 215.21 60 Enterprise Fund MINUTEMAN, INC.D/C Vac Key Lock Repair & Replacement Qty 1 for Lic# A10843 44.95 60 Enterprise Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Female Cam, Male Cam, Blk Reduce Cuppling Qty 4 65.84 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.3PH unit heater for reuse bldg 737.44 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 8Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 186 of 475 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Safety Glasses Qty 12 81.00 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Sanding discs & wire brushes 103.80 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Threaded water press regulater for new CL2 analyzer 50.21 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.V-belt tension tester 79.20 60 Enterprise Fund MYFLEETCENTER.COM Signature Oil Change #C13732 31.99 60 Enterprise Fund MYFLEETCENTER.COM Signature Oil Change #C20028 32.71 60 Enterprise Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS Heavy duty belt 25.72 60 Enterprise Fund NORTHWEST POWER SYSTEMS, INC Labor for 150hr generator service on CCTV Van 2 C19267 261.00 60 Enterprise Fund NORTHWEST POWER SYSTEMS, INC Labor for annual inspection of portable generators plus 2,406.21 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Fuse for pump on sprayer 3.99 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Replacement Wiper Blades for Lic# C15633 - Qty 2 35.98 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Batteries, folders, scale, notebook pads - qty 4 45.14 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Notebook pads qty 12 10.06 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Rulers, manila file folders, hanging folder,copy paper-qty 5 46.74 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Wastebasket and journals - Qty 4 28.25 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Binders and dividers for Emergency Response Plan 78.93 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Binders and dividers for lab 49.07 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Pens Med Blue - Qty 2 Dozen 19.72 60 Enterprise Fund OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY Labor & parts to repair garage door on CCTV Van garage 100.30 60 Enterprise Fund OXARC, INC.18-0091 Soduim Hypochlorite Delivery Qty 1603gl 2,654.89 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Block fork terminal, EMT strap, union connector, ridge elbow 91.01 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Butt Connectors - Qty 800 70.96 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Electronic ballast & emergency ballast for light fixtur-qty2 113.74 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Panel & hinge cover to repair broken conduits next to sludge 337.56 60 Enterprise Fund POSTNET Postage & Mailing for Backflow Ltrs & Stamps Qty 21 111.17 60 Enterprise Fund POSTNET Postage & Mailing for Backflow Ltrs & Stamps Qty 27 45.43 60 Enterprise Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT POSTAGE USE, December 2017 233.03 60 Enterprise Fund ROBERTSON SUPPLY, INC.Grundfos Valve Kit Qty 2 813.20 60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC 3/4 PVC Coup, THD Bush, Flare Union Qty 8 130.86 60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC Bushing & ball check valve - qty 15 180.87 60 Enterprise Fund SUBURBAN PROPANE Propane for N. Black Cat lift station (724.2 gal)3,244.90 60 Enterprise Fund SULLIVAN REBERGER 17-0409, monthly lobbying fees, December 2017 4,000.00 60 Enterprise Fund SUNROC CORPORATION 3/4inch 67 Rock Washed Qty 14.91tn 229.10 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Iphone cases, Badge Reel, Badge Holder, Tape - Qty 16 156.62 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 9Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 187 of 475 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Safety Boot S. Browen Qty 1 183.30 60 Enterprise Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP Emboirding of Patching & Logo M. Flesher Qty 1 17.75 60 Enterprise Fund TRUGREEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Yard clean up at S. Black Cat lift station 250.00 60 Enterprise Fund UPSON COMPANY Investigation & Repair of Leak of Inventory Area 324.36 60 Enterprise Fund USA BLUEBOOK CL10 Differential PH Sensor Qty 1 1,433.54 60 Enterprise Fund USA BLUEBOOK Credit, Sample Lines Strainer Qty 1 (151.25) 60 Enterprise Fund USA BLUEBOOK Replacement for Sample Strainer Assembly Qty 1 151.25 60 Enterprise Fund VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 18-0013 - Janitorial Services - December 2017 1,715.17 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 272508216-00001 Modem for Sys Emergency - 11/24/17-12/23/17 22.45 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00001 Data, 11/21/17-12/20/17 916.69 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00002 Cellphones - 11/21/17-12/20/17 2,480.51 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00003 Mobile Devices - 11/21/17-12/20/17 9.84 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Angular contact bearing - qty 3 150.54 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC HVAC high capacity pleated filters - qty 12 59.28 60 Enterprise Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA LX7-658362, copier lease 11/17 & Copies 11/15/17-12/15/17 164.23 60 Enterprise Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA LX7-985464, copier lease 11/17 & Copies 11/15/17-12/15/17 156.05 60 Enterprise Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA MX4-761692, copier lease 11/17 & Copies 11/15/17-11/30/17 266.77 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 186,096.85 Report Total 422,885.48 Date: 1/4/18 11:31:32 AM Page: 10Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 188 of 475 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 6A Project/File Number: Item Title: Idaho Humane Society Update for 2017 Meetina Notes l� January 9, 2018 City of Meridian Animal Care and Control Update Dog and Cat Shelter Admission Trends All Origins •Overall animal Intakes for Ada County have been trending downward and are at historically low numbers. •Intake policies have remained the same as ever with IHS functioning as an open admission shelter that does not turn animals away. •The actual jurisdiction of IHS as an animal control and sheltering contractor has expanded during this time period to encompass Ada County and all municipalities except Star. 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 9500 10000 19 9 8 19 9 9 20 0 0 20 0 1 20 0 2 20 0 3 20 0 4 20 0 5 20 0 6 20 0 7 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 20 1 7 Meridian and Total Jurisdictions Stray Admission Trends •Stray cats originating from Meridian remained 15% of total stray cats handled from FY 15 to FY 17 •Stray dogs originating from Boise City declined from 17% to 16% of total stray dogs handled from FY 15 to FY 17 •Additionally IHS received 195 cats , 140 dogs, 26 rabbits, 13 rats, 5 guinea pigs, 2 parakeets, 1 domestic pig, 3 ferrets, 2 chickens, 2 reptiles, and 3 mice from Meridian resident pet owners in FY 2017. •Wildlife admissions from Meridian include 1 duck, 1 fox, 3 squirrels, 7 wild birds, 3 wild rabbits. 665 794 755 718 496 424 400 396 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 2014 2015 2016 2017 Meridian Total Meridian Total All Jurisdictions Cat Intake by Source •Stray and seized by humane officer admissions of cats from all jurisdictions has shown a downward trend for the past three years. •The number of owner surrendered cats has shown a steady decline since before 2011 and is at its lowest number for past 20 years. •Transfer of cats from other rescue and under resourced shelters remains at an insignificant level but as space becomes available during course of year IHS is assisting with some very limited transfer admissions. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Stray or Seized Shelter/Rescue Transfer Returned after Adoption Owner Surrendered All Jurisdiction Dog Intake by Source •Stray and seized by humane officer admissions of dogs has shown a downward trend for many years with the exception of the first two years of Meridian enforcement that resulted in a temporary increase. •The number of owner surrendered dogs has shown a steady decline since before 2011 and is at its lowest number for past 20 years. •Transfer of dogs from other rescue and under resourced shelters is an extremely significant activity of the IHS and is growing. Two years ago was the first in which transfer in of dogs exceeded owner surrendered dogs. Transfers dogs make up approx. 1/3 of dogs sheltered and approx. ½ of dogs adopted out. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Stray or Seized Shelter/Rescue Transfer Owner Surrendered Intake by Source Year to Date FY 2018 All Species •Year to date admissions of all animals from all areas in FY 17 was 12,339 versus 12,045 in FY 16. •62 % of admissions are strays and animals seized by enforcement. •13 % of pets handled originate with other shelters and rescue organizations. Seized by Enforcement 1% Owner Surrender 18% Transfer from Rescue/Shelter 13% [CATEGORY NAME] Stray 61% Returned from Adopters 6% Overall Cat Outcome Trends All Origins 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Adopted 3419 2995 3129 3061 3116 3069 3098 Died in Shelter 36 71 91 118 102 71 43 DOA 153 131 161 196 236 220 171 Euthanasia 3312 3410 2804 3287 3091 2494 2629 Return to Owner 204 234 199 234 249 243 210 Transfer Out 36 47 25 32 19 25 99 •The outcome of cats in the shelter has improved with decreased euthanasia numbers. 2016 was the lowest euthanasia year on record. •Adoptions of cats are static over past 6 years. •Percent of stray cats returned to owners remains low which is typical throughout the U.S. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Adopted Euthanasia Return to Owner Transfer Out Animal Overall Dog Outcome Trends All Origins •Dog euthanasia remains at historical low. •Percent of stray dogs returned to owners is 64% of stray intake dogs. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Adopted 3425 3715 3671 3620 3164 3111 3086 Died in Shelter 13 25 21 13 18 17 39 DOA 62 42 41 70 55 56 46 Euthanasia 689 531 425 466 422 486 453 Return to Owner 1336 1339 1295 1551 1528 1452 1470 Transfer Out 53 73 80 95 90 126 118 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Adopted Euthanasia Return to Owner Transfer Out Outcomes for Meridian Origin Stray Dogs and Cats 2017 Live Release Rate: Dogs 92% Cats 52% Percent Strays Returned to Owner: Dogs 62% Cats 6% Percent Strays Adopted: Dogs 29% Cats 45% Reasons for Euthanasia •The most common reason for euthanasia of dogs is dangerous behavior. •Time and room are no longer factors influencing euthanasia decisions. •Extensive medical and surgical capabilities means only the most severe or very difficult to manage illnesses or injuries necessitate euthanasia. 67% 28% 5% Aggression / Bite Case / Unsocialized Untreatable Medical Conditions Treatable Incurable Medical Conditions Reasons for Euthanasia •Feral or unsocialized nature remains the most common reason for euthanasia of cats. •Seasonal cat influxes which strain facilities remain a secondary, but additional factor influencing euthanasia for other reasons despite overall declining intakes of cats. 19% 8% 45% 10% 2% 12% 4% Aggression / Behavior / Bite Case / Unsocialized Contagious Disease Feral Medical Treatable Incurable Medical Treatable Medical Untreatable Unweaned Field Service Incident and Investigation Response Meridian Incident 2016 2017 Dog Bites and Attacks 160 174 Barking 186 184 Cruelty and Neglect 78 96 DOA, Injured or Sick 182 187 Dog at Large 221 210 Pick up Dog, Cat, Wildlife 435 408 Other 170 291 TOTAL 1,432 1,550 •10 FTE = 1 supervisor, 2 dispatch officers, 7 field officers •7 day per week, 24 hour coverage FY 2017 Annual Budget Results •Municipal & County animal control and sheltering contracts equaled $1,765,582 in FY 2017. This amounted to 22% of total revenue, and 30 % of our operating budget of $5,813,460. •Meridian contract equaled $370,132 for FY 2017, which was 21% of the total contract income. •FY 2017 expenses were within 0.5% of budget. Revenue Adoptions Revenue $686,997 Animal Care and Sheltering Revenue $1,893,029 Donations and Planned Giving $2,388,202 Pet Supplies and Other $256,247 Veterinary Services Revenue $2,034,723 Endowment & Temporary Restricted $724,627 Total Revenue $7,259,193 Expenses Animal Care & Adoptions $2,587,065 Veterinary Medical Services $2,417,133 Other Programs $268,724 Administration $384,526 Fundraising $425,648 Total Expenses $6,083,096 Investment Gains, net $730,696 Net Income $1,906,793 Animal Care and Control Contract Contract is allocation of expenses attributable to proportion of stray animals handled and staff that are dedicated to animal control enforcement. Total FY 2018 Payroll: $3.7 M Allocated to Contract: $1.4 M Total FY 2018 Operations & Maintenance: $2.2 M Allocated to Contract: $600,000 Meridian 2018 contract comprises 21% of the total animal care and control contract based on proportionate sharing of expenses between other communities. Expense is allocated between different communities based on field service calls. This also corresponds closely with the percent of population served by IHS. Meridian Animal Control Contract History: 2014 $357,615 2015 $370,132 2016 $370,132 2017 $370,132 2018 $381,132 Current Meridian Contract = $3.48 per capita Contract Overview •Contracts pay for: A share of the overall basic animal care expense proportional to numbers of stray and seized pets housed by IHS including proportionate payroll allocations of animal care staff. Field animal control officers •Contracts do not pay for: Share of the overall animal care expense attributable from relinquished pets from residents, and transferred pets from other rescues and shelters. Special programs (education, Pet Food Pantry, IDAPI, WISKR). Petsmart Adoption Center Fundraising Veterinary Medical Center Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine Senior Veterinary Student Training Program Advertising, Public Relations and Marketing Volunteer and Foster programs Most Capital Repairs and Improvements including vehicles, major building repairs, depreciation. Designed to be Kind Capital Campaign Adoption Center and Veterinary Hospital City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 613 Project/File Number: Item Title: Idaho Avenue Request - Meridian Downtown Business Association (MDBA) Meetina Notes Dear Members of the Council, My name is Nick Grove, I come to you on behalf of the members of the Meridian Downtown Business Association (MDBA) from which I currently sit as president. I am here today to tell you about our organization and make a request in regards to the Idaho Avenue placemaking project. The MDBA has existed in several forms over the years, with our current iteration forming in 2014. Our board consists of nine officers and three ex-officio officers representing the City of Meridian, Meridian Chamber of Commerce and the Meridian Development Corporation (MDC). We have 21 paid members, an increase of 91% from 2016. We spent much of the past year building our backend operations, readying for a large membership drive in 2018. In 2015, the MDBA, City of Meridian and MDC entered an agreement to pilot a project to activate a segment of Idaho Avenue between Main St. and 2nd St. The purpose of the project was to create a placemaking or parklet atmosphere on Idaho Avenue The MDBA worked with the City and MDC to plan the project and coordinate with ACHD in moving parking spaces further from the sidewalks on Idaho Avenue creating new usable space where those parking spaces had been. Blue paint was applied to the asphalt to indicate a new non-parking zone and furnishings were purchased with funds from the Meridian City Council and MDC. Those furnishings included wood platforms, planters, and a bike rack which were spread on both the north and south sides of Idaho Avenue in the newly painted blue strips. During both years of the project the MDBA has planted and maintained flowers in the planters. Unfortunately, the project has not worked as was originally projected. Through many conversations, meetings and a survey of business owners on this portion of Idaho Avenue it has been determined that we would like to discontinue the Idaho Avenue project. As the City owns the furnishings used for this project, I am here asking on behalf of the MDBA members that the furnishings be removed from Idaho Avenue and the street striping be returned to its original placement. Warm regards, Nick Grove Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 191 of 475 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 7A Project/File Number: Item Title: Quarterly Update from New Ventures Lab Meetinq Notes New Ventures Lab — Quarterly Report — September thru December 2017 Current Tenants Troutjousters (3) [6] Clean Carpet Team (3) Sharper Tool (1) [12] Heeren Content & Strategy (2) [10] All Wrapped Up (1) Lime Tree Labs (4) [3] Supported Systems (2) Command Performance/Home Tech Agency (2) [4] Treasure Valley Children's Theater (5) The Network Operations Company (4) [4] BizSprout (1) My Social Media (1) (employed on premises) [contractors — domestic & foreign] Open Space - Monthly Jeff Ehlers — MWI (Salt Lake City) Steve Jerman — Cloudspot (Seattle) Jim Thompson — Lumenly (Boise) Brandon Wright — Wright Stuff Media (Meridian) Updates Cooper Plumbing — Became a tenant in February 2017 as one-person firm. Grew to eight employees with five vehicles. Purchased a shop in Nampa and moved out in December 2017. Market Soldier— Became a tenant in March of 2017 while working on a software package to improve office administration and marketing for the real estate market for local Realtor. Realtor selected another company at a much higher price. Moved to free office space in west Boise. Troutjousters — Troutjousters became a tenant in April of 2016 with the owner as the sole employee. They have added 3 employees and work with 6-9 contractors depending on the project they are working on. Premiered two film shorts and added five videos to their YouTube channel. Began looking for larger space they could acquire in "downtown" Meridian in October. Unable to find the right space at the right price to acquire they will lease space on Franklin Road between Locust Grove and Eagle beginning in February. Crash Eleven — Became a tenant in May of 2017 as a contractor to Troutjousters. Will be moving into the new location in February. Waiting list for office space — software development company, personal aviation vehicle (PAV) supplemental propulsion system, medical device Beginning in February we will have an Entrepreneur in Residence for two weeks every month — Aaron Stanton, Booklamp & Apple. Events & Meetings September 55 October 82 November 72 December 34 Total 243 Treasure Valley Children's Theater Word Press Meetup Project Management Institute Embedded Systems Meetup Toastmasters Python Meetup Meridian Chamber —Ambassadors, Leadership Swift Meetup CMRI Financial Revenue Expenses Gross Profit September $3291.25 $2992.23 $299.02 October $3870.19 $3599.07 $271.12 November $4598.55 $3033.26 $1565.29 December $3482.93 $2677.12 $805.73 G j w w! a 3 - �w. or N '6 G CLO d IV _a fn A03 A m W 9 w N V 3 O a O � O a v o Oo 3 -_ o -I n .{ < n < n a< _ rar o i. -1 -� n o __ f � co J 3 w m C o 3 o v a g n w 0 a 3 W v 3 a g a 3 n 33 y < (D a m o ri 9 > C) > o r- , ,� < n. CL CL o o -1 c = a o a N � - Ft-- 01 67 91 a 0 0) _ :C)� 3 v 3 3 •o 0 3 v v o 3 3 ;:nig ,, { A 3 ;az 3 3 3 3 3 c a la N D LD ' F C n O D < o < N (D < o < c) "i < y m --1- < N (D '� < N -< --1 c D -< g -I n o -i -1 0 n ant a O D D o -1 F-4rN `C (C 'O (G W w - = = _ o i , 3 m , mo ° 3 CL 1 -4 n W 1 N O N _ N 00 N N w f t-LJco . u 1 N A W A c0 F w 0 o 3 a m 3 not a 3 0 3 3 3 3 W � `•D c7 o -1 -1 o a << < < a n n r> 3 Go _ I w a 3 3 3 � x 7 rt1 7 O .r o w a N I G I • s ! co 0) O 3 33 ,; cn c N to CL v � CL d K 7 l P N N P co Fd Ul j c cn V 3 o v, v ' 3 w Cn A w to p w O ^a w v, A � c 3 a 'n 9 •g©i W •° d c � -a w 'D 3 -i 3 q -� 3 v 3 -� 3 3 ti 3 3 3 0 3. 0 3< 0 3 -1 n 3 -a 3 -I in -4 3 -1 d > -I -I < o -moi o -nin -1 C 0 -I 3 ,� G o --1o � 1 o n ,� C> � 0 G (� W . W W C0 N o a w o o a © 3 a rn N 3 m 3 o m 3 3 3 v 3 C 3 3 m 3 3 � � o K -a cu C7 t W- 7 IV � F ', -_ -O W I 4m Ln =r . rn cn 3 3 A _' !Ow 3 v v 9 •0 3 v -o -o N Z ' 3 � < d N < < N �,' Ya "'I -i N °1• •� -•I � � -I -I n n n o < o n 0 .� -i m n O.I c n =D - 0 c D 0- c o D o D O CL U-3 �p 6z 4� 4 - m A cc w w w o a Q m y a o 0 3 3 01 C:!� < n m n,'ro < m _ < a < m o fD -I _ fD N < c M := a a A rn Fo 3` ;? �• A A A .o I os- p Q o 0 3 n 3 3 3 3 F 0. i J, 0 { i °' 3 0 d cn � 3 v 3 3 3 _ a y O a - a m � A. J - ^V z L m o < mm < a ro a N to 3m C rt —. fD CD CL (D rt m CI a N _ a 0 ro N 9 fD a ci W C N m N N m fD 3 V! 3 m c' 3 � .m (D MCD N N Al C cn n O 0 9 m _a p1 3 o 3 co 3 i c M F, to N F(A i N <O a a to �ri M •cs to Cn "-.'.. •.1 t71 j C.."V V U7 - a P W E�, t: C3 a o ® • • .a O - p .. lu n n 0 n -1 -i -{ n a -I IF; F (g• M °' U `` 1.-!• - �'s,_ 3 13 a a w m --1 m (D 3 nCD � a CD ra. c p .. ni a < �'< OD F!2 c r ., W r� a to a G '' a F'`�•.:'q v ?... i'_? . c" i �_J' - • • A --� cfl A cD W A .a to 3 0 3 w w fuf w v a N 3< N 3< N• z 3 --1 N• B 3 -1 n c ,D n D n '{ .� 0; -j m -< < m O n c n D c n D n D ° < < D D o < < to n D c -1 rt N c M N }P 3 � Fr,,o, � (O N N ,ni, O tG -s Q D , l0 (2 t0 f A A co N N A w t0 w .p to A co jW o w a 3 x GJ o a 3 0 3 O ° ra c 3 .• 3 01 w , 3 1 ca a � � o � 3 3 -i 3 W n vCi 3 0 3 0 n ni o y m n c �, << Q 0, --1 -0 0 tai CD to 1 tD -i tp C N Fw" F;� Fo N 0) to •a 4 IFD 3 {,, w 3 w � w� w < p -i C� a ni --i -nI 1 a F- o a m 13 3 o 3 m 0 o () < y < O O C� a a at a a z 3 m c' 3 � .m (D MCD N N Al C cn n O 0 9 m _a p1 3 r ' Z n S i4 _ co Ln W G !D m Chm N Q < n o, ., m + cr Z n z7 ID cD ' 13 cn m � Z: a -i a -a , , l - cn_ N - N - Q', P0, Li V rn to 3 3 3 = m C oli ;m Q; - _- _- to 3 3 a a 3 3 3 3 v 0 0 S N 7 �' -' 0 ; '' ' j C Q 0 0 c C 0 D �J m p� (—j -ni O � m ;n �D (n Pji a c w N CL cn i n j N _ i m F O0 rn + W ED [, Iljji 3 3 w w w n; n _ ' t' � f,{ Ft -- N N 00 F c -n w 3�,� � -mn O n 0 m CL a. m U) i -i City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 713 Project/File Number: Item Title: Presentation of Bid Results and Award of AIA 132 Agreements to the prime contractors for the "South Meridian Regional Park" to multiple contractors per the schedule below for a Not -To -Exceed total amount of $3,857,861.72. These awards are the result of the Formal IFB issued November 17, 2017 and opened December 19th. Thirty bids were received for the fourteen different bid Packages. BPI — Knife River Corporation $1,587,382.72 BP2 — Franz Witte Landscape Contracting $ 710,327.00 BP3 — Anvil Fence Company $ 149,500.00 BP4 — Landon Enterprises, LLC $ 563,910.00 BP5 — Walker Fox Brick & Block, Inc. $ 72,250.00 BP6 — Outland Steel, Inc. $ 39,670.00 BP7 — Leighton Enterprises, Inc. $ 37,190.00 BP8 — Signature Roofing $ 66,312.00 BP9 — D&A Door & Specialties, Inc. $ 36,720.00 BPI — SBI Contracting, Inc. $ 13,730.00 BP13 — Lucky Dog Recreation $ 59,750.00 BP14 — DE Best Plumbing, Inc. $ 108,950.00 BPI — TVR, Inc. $ 26,300.00 BP16 — Power Plus, Inc. $ 385,870.00 Meetinq Notes 0 Page 1 Memo To: CJ Coles, City Clerk, From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager CC: Mike Barton, Steve Siddoway Date: 12/27/17 Re: January 9 th City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the January 9th City Council Agenda under Parks Department Report . Presentation of Bid Results and Award of AIA 132 Agreements to the prime contractors for the “South Meridian Regional Park” to multiple contractors per the schedule below for a Not-To-Exceed total amount of $3,857,861.72. These awards are the result of the Formal IFB issued November 17, 2017 and opened December 19 th . Thirty bids were received for the fourteen different bid packages. BP1 – Knife River Corporation $1,587,382.72 BP2 – Franz Witte Landscape Contracting $ 710,327.00 BP3 – Anvil Fence Company $ 149,500.00 BP4 – Landon Enterprises, LLC $ 563,910.00 BP5 – Walker Fox Brick & Block, Inc. $ 72,250.00 BP6 – Outland Steel, Inc. $ 39,670.00 BP7 – Leighton Enterprises, Inc. $ 37,190.00 BP8 – Signature Roofing $ 66,312.00 BP9 – D&A Door & Specialties, Inc. $ 36,720.00 BP12 – SBI Contracting, Inc. $ 13,730.00 BP13 – LuckyDog Recreation $ 59,750.00 BP14 – DeBest Plumbing, Inc. $ 108,950.00 BP15 – TVR, Inc. $ 26,300.00 BP16 – Power Plus, Inc. $ 385,870.00 Recommended Council Action: Approval of Award of 14 Bids and authorize the Mayor to execute the corresponding Agreements to the low bidders for an overall total of $3,857,861.72. Thank you for your consideration. City of Meridian Purchasing Dept. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 194 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park City Council Workshop Presentation January 9, 2018 By Mike Barton, MPR Parks Superintendent Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 195 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Agenda •Process/Project Schedule •Cost Reduction Planning •Bid Strategy •Bid Results •Overall Post-Bid Project Budget •Softball Field Lighting Discussion •LED vs. HID (Metal Halide) •Future Contracts •Contract Award Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 196 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Process/Project Schedule Summer 2019 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Public Input Design Park Naming Bidding Award Construction Park Opening Commission Meetings Council Presentations Neighborhood Meetings 2018 Surveys - Stakeholder Mtgs Conceptual 2015 2016 2017 Schematic Design thru CDs Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 197 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Cost Reduction Planning Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 198 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Bid Strategy •Winter Bidding •Bids Sent to 133 Contractors •16 Bid Packages Issued •30 Bids Received •2 Bid Packages Without Bids Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 199 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Bid Results BP1 Knife River Corporation $1,587,382.72 BP2 Franz Witte Landscape Contracting $710,327.00 BP3 Anvil Fence Company $ 149,500.00 BP4 Landon Enterprises, LLC $ 563,910.00 BP5 Walker Fox Brick & Block,Inc.$ 72,250.00 BP6 Outland Steel, Inc.$ 39,670.00 BP7 Leighton Enterprises, Inc.$ 37,190.00 BP8 Signature Roofing $ 66,312.00 BP9 D&A Door & Specialties, Inc.$ 36,720.00 BP12 SBI Contracting, Inc.$ 13,730.00 BP13 Lucky Dog Recreation $ 59,750.00 BP14 DeBest Plumbing,Inc.$ 108,950.00 BP15 TVR,Inc.$ 26,300.00 BP16 Power Plus,Inc.$ 385,870.00 TOTAL $3,857,861.72 (Difference Between High & Low Bids = $1.1 Million) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 200 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Overall Post-Bid Project Budget Idaho Power Connection Fee Allowance 125,000$ Architect & Engineer Fees 641,726$ Testing & Special Inspections Allowance 50,000$ Insurance Cost Builders Risk 17,500$ Owner Furnishings, Fixtures, & Equipment Allowance 125,000$ Owner Soft Cost Contingency 50,000$ Construction Cost Estimate 3,920,362$ Destination Playground - Design Build Allowance 300,000$ Sand & Water Play - Design Build Allowance 125,000$ Splash Pad - Design Build Allowance 75,000$ Sign Package 25,000$ Environmental Interpretation/Artwork 100,000$ ACHD Road Trust 148,000$ General Conditions 465,750$ Construction Contingency 462,815$ Construction Management Fee 287,381$ Post-Bid Project Budget 6,918,534$ Budget 6,750,000$ Amount Over (169,034)$ Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 201 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Softball Field Lighting •Current Contract Award is for Metal Halide Lights •LED Lights are an Extra $225,000 not in the Budget •LED Light Pros •Lower Energy Cost •Less Glare •Longer-Lasting Bulbs •LED Light Cons •Cost •Council Decision? •Return with Budget Amendment of $225,000 for LED Lights •Approve Existing Electrical Contract with No Budget Amendment Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 202 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Future Contracts •Bid Package 10 -Drywall & Acoustical Assemblies •No Bids Received •Bid Package 11 –Painting •No Bids Received •Design Build -Destination Playground •Design Build -Splash Pad •Design Build -Sand & Water Play Area •Entry Sign/Artwork •ACHD Road Trust for Mid-Mile Collector •Purchase Order for Construction Management & General Conditions (All of these future contracts are accounted for in the Post -Bid Project Budget.) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 203 of 475 South Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Contract Award •Asking Council Approval of Bid Results & Award of AIA 132 Agreements to the Prime Contractors for the South Meridian Regional Park to Multiple Contractors for a Not-To -Exceed Total Amount of $3,857,861.72 THANK YOU Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 204 of 475 BI D D E R A D D E N D U M S B I D B O N D / B I D S E C U R I T Y C O N T R A C T O R ' S L I C E N S E P U B L I C W O R K S L I C E N S E B A S E B I D A L T 1 ( L A R G E P I C N I C S H E L T E R ) A L T 2 ( S T A G E ) A L T 3 ( N E E N T R Y G R E E N U P & I R R I G A T I O N ) A L T 4 (GRAVEL OVERFLOW PARKING) ALT 5 (SOFTBALL FIELD LIGHTING - METAL HALIDE) ALT 6 (SOFTBALL FIELD LIGHTING - LED) Kn i f e R i v e r C o r p o r a t i o n - N o r t h w e s t x x x x 1 , 5 4 5 , 4 7 6 . 0 0 $ 5 , 8 8 3 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 3 4 . 7 2 $ 3 4 , 5 8 9 . 0 0 $ Gr a n i t e E x c a v a t i o n , I n c . x x x x 1 , 8 3 2 , 1 3 2 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 6 7 . 6 8 $ 2 , 5 7 1 . 6 8 $ 1 1 1 , 3 8 5 . 5 9 $ 3 6 , 9 1 8 . 9 4 $ Th u e s o n C o n s t r u c t i o n , I n c . x x x x 1 , 9 4 6 , 3 3 2 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ Lu r r e C o n s t r u c t i o n , I n c . x x x x 2 , 2 5 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ Fr a n z W i t t e L a n d s c a p e C o n t r a c t i n g , I n c . x x x x 6 4 9 , 5 5 7 . 0 0 $ ( 2 0 0 . 0 0 ) $ 2 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 9 , 9 7 0 . 0 0 $ Pi o n e e r L a n d s c a p e , I n c . x x x x 6 7 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ ( 3 0 0 . 0 0 ) $ 1 7 , 4 3 5 . 0 0 $ 8 9 , 8 8 9 . 0 0 $ Bo d e n H a u s L a n d s c a p e , I n c . x x x x 8 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ ( 7 3 8 . 0 0 ) $ 3 2 , 7 4 8 . 0 0 $ 9 2 , 0 4 8 . 0 0 $ Cl e a r w a t e r L a n d s c a p e x x x x 8 3 0 , 8 8 4 . 0 0 $ ( 5 0 0 . 0 0 ) $ 2 4 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 , 2 6 6 . 0 0 $ An v i l F e n c e C o m p a n y x x x x 1 4 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ Ca s c a d e F e n c e C o . , I n c . x x x x 1 8 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 2 - L a n d s c a p i n g a n d I r r i g a t i o n Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 3 - F e n c i n g a n d G a t e s BI D A B S T R A C T CI T Y O F M E R I D I A N - S O U T H M E R I D I A N R E G I O N A L P A R K LA K E H A Z E L ME R I D I A N , I D A H O 12 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 7 Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 1 - S i t e w o r k , U t i l i t i e s a n d A s p h a l t P a v i n g Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 2 0 5 o f 4 7 5 BI D D E R A D D E N D U M S B I D B O N D / B I D S E C U R I T Y C O N T R A C T O R ' S L I C E N S E P U B L I C W O R K S L I C E N S E B A S E B I D A L T 1 ( L A R G E P I C N I C S H E L T E R ) A L T 2 ( S T A G E ) A L T 3 ( N E E N T R Y G R E E N U P & I R R I G A T I O N ) A L T 4 (GRAVEL OVERFLOW PARKING) ALT 5 (SOFTBALL FIELD LIGHTING - METAL HALIDE) ALT 6 (SOFTBALL FIELD LIGHTING - LED) La n d o n E n t e r p r i s e s , L L C x x x x 5 4 7 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ Lu r r e C o n s t r u c t i o n , I n c . x x x x 5 7 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ W a l k e r F o x B r i c k a n d B l o c k , I n c . x x x x 6 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ TM C , I n c . x x x x 8 6 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 2 4 5 . 0 0 $ Al p h a M a s o n r y , I n c . * * A d d e n d u m s N o t A c k n B i d N o t R e ad x x x Ou t l a n d S t e e l , I n c . x x x x 3 9 , 6 7 0 . 0 0 $ Le i g h t o n E n t e r p r i s e s , I n c . x x x x 3 7 , 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ Ca n o R o o f i n g , I n c d b a S i g n a t u r e R o o f i n g x CC x x 6 6 , 3 1 2 . 0 0 $ Qu a l i t y T i l e R o o f i n g , I n c . x x x x 6 8 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ D& A D o o r a n d S p e c i a l t i e s , I n c . x x x x 3 6 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ No B i d d e r s - B u d g e t O n l y 30 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 8 - R o o f i n g Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 9 - D o o r s , F r a m e s a n d H a r d w a r e Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 1 0 - D r y w a l l a n d A c o u s t i c a l A s s e m b l ie s Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 5 - M a s o n r y Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 6 - S t e e l F a b r i c a t i o n a n d E r e c t i o n Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 7 - W o o d F r a m i n g a n d T r u s s e s Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 4 - C o n c r e t e Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 2 0 6 o f 4 7 5 BI D D E R A D D E N D U M S B I D B O N D / B I D S E C U R I T Y C O N T R A C T O R ' S L I C E N S E P U B L I C W O R K S L I C E N S E B A S E B I D A L T 1 ( L A R G E P I C N I C S H E L T E R ) A L T 2 ( S T A G E ) A L T 3 ( N E E N T R Y G R E E N U P & I R R I G A T I O N ) A L T 4 (GRAVEL OVERFLOW PARKING) ALT 5 (SOFTBALL FIELD LIGHTING - METAL HALIDE) ALT 6 (SOFTBALL FIELD LIGHTING - LED) No B i d d e r s - B u d g e t O n l y 32 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ SB I C o n t r a c t i n g , I n c . x x x x 1 3 , 7 3 0 . 0 0 $ Lu c k y D o g R e c r e a t i o n x x x x 5 9 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ De B e s t P l u m b i n g , I n c . x x x x 1 0 8 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ Mo u n t a i n W e s t M e c h a n i c a l x x x x 1 1 0 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 $ TV R H V A C R , I n c . x x x x 2 6 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ Po w e r P l u s , I n c . x x x x 1 8 7 , 7 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 195,890.00 $ 374,530.00 $ En e r g y E n t e r p r i s e G r o u p , I n c . x x x x 1 9 8 , 7 4 6 . 0 0 $ 2 , 3 3 2 . 0 0 $ 206,738.00 $ 385,765.00 $ An d e r s o n & W o o d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o . I n c . x x x x 2 1 5 , 4 8 8 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 8 6 . 0 0 $ 7 , 4 1 3 . 0 0 $ 383,357.00 $ 523,440.00 $ Qu a l i t y E l e c t r i c , I n c . x x x x 2 1 5 , 6 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 $ 250,684.00 $ 384,268.00 $ Mo u n t a i n P o w e r E l e c t r i c a l C o n t r a c t o r s x x x x 2 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 8 3 . 0 0 $ 5 , 4 6 6 . 0 0 $ 207,249.00 $ 382,995.00 $ Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 1 1 - P a i n t i n g Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 1 2 - S p e c i a l t i e s Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 1 3 - P i c n i c S h e l t e r Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 1 4 - P l u m b i n g S y s t e m Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 1 5 - H V A C S y s t e m Bi d P a c k a g e N o . 1 6 - E l e c t r i c a l S y s t e m s Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a J a n u a r y 9 , 2 0 1 8 – P a g e 2 0 7 o f 4 7 5 City Of, Melidian Detailed Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report 55 - capital Plojecta 5200-Parks-Ad4ia Erotl 7A/7/2011 Through 9/30/2018 Kei!h Budget with Current Year Actual Budget Remaining Percent of Budget Remaining 96921 10121 . h Capital Outlay 77 acre South Park South Melidian Regional Park Construction 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 100.00; Total Capital Outlay TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0.00 l 00u 000.00 100.00? 0.00 l c00 000 .00 100.00r Dztet 12/21/\1 o5:22: 4 3 PM L,aqq.g_qq. q-0 !, aaq, aqq. q0 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 208 of 475 citY of l,Elidian Detailed Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Keith - Unposted Transactions Included In Report 0? - Iq)act Fund 5200-Palks-AdDin trotn lO /1/2071 Through 9/30/2018 96921 10127 10121 . h Capital OutIay 77 acre South Park South Meridian Property South Meridian Regional Park Construction Budget wlth Curren! Year Actual Budget Remainrng Percent of Budget Remalning 0.00 3,000,000.00 539.30 0.00 (539-30) 3,000,000.00 0 .00* 100.00c Carr. . .Carryfor:ward Total Capitaf Outlay 585, r15.44 0-00 585.115-44 100.00? 3,585,115.44 539.30 l,1ql,!1q.ry 99.982 TOTAL EXPENDlTURES 3,585,115.44 s39.30 584 516.14 Date.. 12/21/t1 C5r02:33 Pr.1 ___ -9_9-9!! Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 209 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 210 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 211 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 212 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 213 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 214 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 215 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 216 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 217 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 218 of 475 All binding documents including the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Supplemental Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal Forms, and the Project Schedule are intended to be part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 General Conditions Exhibit A, Contract Document Schedule dated December 21, 2017 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article I 1 of AIA Document A232-2009 as modified Refer to Supplemental Conditions modifying AIA Document A232-2009 for changes and additions to Article 11 "Insurance and Bonds". Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liabilityfor insurance required in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agr s enter: m o day and year first written above. OWNER (Sig tur CONT` CTOR (Signature) Tammy de Weerd , Mayor Jessee Rosin Authorized Agent (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document A132TM — 2009 (formerly All 01 TMCMa —1992). Copyright © 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Init. reserved. WARNING: This AIA° Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution 10 of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:33:41 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is qQ� t not for resale. (1315130923) User Notes: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 220 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 221 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 222 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 223 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 224 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 225 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 226 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 227 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 228 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 229 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 231 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 232 of 475 (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liabilityfor insurance required in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreement is ente d-into<the day and year first OWNER (Signature) Tammy de Weerd , Mayor (Printed name and title) written above. CONTRACTOR (Signature) /,;���Qrl/P�,.,�a vnr (Printed name and title) AIA Document All 32T — 2009 (formerly A101 TMCMa —1992). Copyright© 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Init. reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:35:21 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (2018921060) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 233 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 234 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 235 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 236 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 237 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 238 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 239 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 240 of 475 This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. 0 OWNER (Signattnre) CONTRA TOR (Signatcrre) Tammy de Weerd , Mayor Mike Thompson President (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document A132TM — 2009 (formerly A101 TMCMa —1992). Copyright© 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Init. reserved. WARNING: This AIAO Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution M of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible p t under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:36:25 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. (1883723852) User Notes: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 242 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 243 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 244 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 245 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 246 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 247 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 248 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 249 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 250 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 251 of 475 Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liability for insurance required in Article I1 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. OWNER (Signator CONT (Signature) Tammy de Weerd , Mayor Ron Landon, President (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document All 32TM — 2009 (formerly All 01 TMCMa —1992). Copyright © 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Inst. reserved. WARNING: This AIA0 Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution 9 of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:37:36 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is (� not for resale. v� User Notes: (1936994627) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 253 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 254 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 255 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 256 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 257 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 258 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 259 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 260 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 261 of 475 Number Date . Pages One 12/05/2017 75 Two 12/11/2017 36 Three 12/13/2017 5 Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 9. § 9.1.7 Additional documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are: .1 AIA Document A132TM-2009, Exhibit A, Determination of the Cost of the Work, if applicable. .2 AIA Document E20lTm-2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .3 AIA Document E202TM-2008, Building Information Modeling Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .4 Other documents, if any, listed below: (List here any additional documents which are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forms and the Contractor's bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless enumerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Documents) All binding documents including the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Supplemental Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal Forms, and the Project Schedule are intended to be part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 General Conditions Exhibit A, Contract Document Schedule dated December 21, 2017 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009 as modified Refer to Supplemental Conditions modifying AIA Document A232-2009 for changes and additions to Article 11 "Insurance and Bonds". Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liability for insurance required in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. OWNE 7A(Sig Tammy de Weerd , Mayor (Printed name and title) n CONtR (Signature Brian Fox, President (Printed name and title) AIA Document All 32T" — 2009 (formerly A1011CMa —1992). Copyright ©1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Init. reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution 8 of this AIAe Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible 1 under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:38:29 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is Q�y(� not for resale. (1869691206) User Notes: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 263 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 264 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 265 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 266 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 267 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 268 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 269 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 270 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 271 of 475 Number Date Pages One 12/05/2017 75 Two 12/11/2017 36 Three 12/13/2017 5 Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 9. § 9.1.7 Additional documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are: .1 AIA Document A132TM-2009, Exhibit A, Determination of the Cost of the Work, if applicable. .2 AIA Document E201TM-2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .3 AIA Document E202TM-2008, Building Information Modeling Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .4 Other documents, if any, listed below: (List here any additional documents which are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forms and the Contractor's bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless enumerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Documents) All binding documents including the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Supplemental Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal Forms, and the Project Schedule are intended to be part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 General Conditions Exhibit A, Contract Document Schedule dated December 21, 2017 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article 1 l of AIA Document A232-2009 as modified Refer to Supplemental Conditions modifying AIA Document A232-2009 for changes and additions to Article 11 "Insurance and Bonds". Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liabilityfor insurance required in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. OWNER (Sig ur (CONT " C.0 (Signature) Tammy de Weerd , Mayor Sonya Roman President (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document At 32 TM — 2009 (formerly All 01 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright © 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Inst. reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:40:06 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1434011982) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 273 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 274 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 275 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 276 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 277 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 278 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 279 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 280 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 281 of 475 Number Date Pages One 12/05/2017 75 Two 12/11/2017 36 Three 12/13/2017 5 Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 9. § 9.1.7 Additional documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are: .1 AIA Document A132TM-2009, Exhibit A, Determination of the Cost of the Work, if applicable. .2 AIA Document E201TM-2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .3 AIA Document E202TM-2008, Building Information Modeling Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .4 Other documents, if any, listed below: (List here any additional documents it hich are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forint and the Contractor's bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless enumerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Documents.) All binding documents including the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Supplemental Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal Forms, and the Project Schedule are intended to be part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 General Conditions Exhibit A, Contract Document Schedule dated December 21, 2017 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009 as modified Refer to Supplemental Conditions modifying AIA Document A232-2009 for changes and additions to Article 11 "Insurance and Bonds". Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liability for insurance required in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. o. - OWNER (Signature Tammy de Weerd , Mayor (Printed name and title) CO CTO (Signature) Trace Leighton, President (Printed name and title) AIA Document A132TM — 2009 (formerly A101 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright© 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Inst. reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:41:10 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (877489977 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 283 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 284 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 285 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 286 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 287 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 288 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 289 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 290 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 291 of 475 Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 9. § 9.1.7 Additional documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are: .1 AIA Document A132TM-2009, Exhibit A, Determination of the Cost of the Work, if applicable. .2 AIA Document E201TM-2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .3 AIA Document E202TM-2008, Building Information Modeling Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .4 Other documents, if any, listed below: (List here any additional documents which are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sarnple forms and the Contractor's bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless emunerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Documents) All binding documents including the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Supplemental Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal Forms, and the Project Schedule are intended to be part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 General Conditions Exhibit A, Contract Document Schedule dated December 21, 2017 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009 as modified Refer to Supplemental Conditions modifying AIA Document A232-2009 for changes and additions to Article I 1 "Insurance and Bonds". Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liability for insurance required in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. OWNER (Signator CONTR (Signature) Tammy de Weerd , Mayor Shane Voiffald, Project (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document A132TM — 2009 (formerly A101 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright © 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Inst. reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution 8 of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:42:16 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. (880235365) User Notes: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 293 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 294 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 295 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 296 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 297 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 298 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 299 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 300 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 301 of 475 § 9.1.7 Additional documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are: .1 AIA Document A132TM-2009, Exhibit A, Determination of the Cost of the Work, if applicable. .2 AIA Document E201TM-2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A AIA Document E202TM-2008, Building Information Modeling Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .4 Other documents, if any, listed below: (List here any additional documents which are intended to form part of the Contract Docuntents. AIA Document A232-2009 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forms and the Contractor's bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless enumerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Documents.) All binding documents including the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Supplemental Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal Forms, and the Project Schedule are intended to be part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 General Conditions Exhibit A, Contract Document Schedule dated December 21, 2017 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article I I of AIA Document A232-2009 as modified Refer to Supplemental Conditions modifying AIA Document A232-2009 for changes and additions to Article 11 "Insurance and Bonds". Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liability for insurance required in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. k1wk-N OWNER (Signatur CONTRACTOR (Signature) �ISI��LTE�1e _ CFO Tammy de Weerd , Mayor (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document All 32TM — 2009 (formerly A101 TMCMa — 1992). Copyright © 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Init. reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:43:37 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1348815472) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 303 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 304 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 305 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 306 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 307 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 308 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 309 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 310 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 311 of 475 Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 9. § 9.1.7 Additional documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are: .1 AIA Document A132TM-2009, Exhibit A, Determination of the Cost of the Work, if applicable. .2 AIA Document E201TM-2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A AIA Document E202TM-2008, Building Information Modeling Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .4 Other documents, if any, listed below: (List here any additional documents lvhich are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forms and the Contractor's bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless enuanerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Docunnents.) All binding documents including the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Supplemental Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal Forms, and the Project Schedule are intended to be part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 General Conditions Exhibit A, Contract Document Schedule dated December 21, 2017 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009 as modified Refer to Supplemental Conditions modifying AIA Document A232-2009 for changes and additions to Article 11 "Insurance and Bonds". Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liability for insurance required in Article I1 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written ab e. OWNER (Signatt CONTRACTOR (Signature) Tammy de Weerd Mayor Sara Schafer, President (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document Al 32111 — 2009 (formerly All OJT" CMa —1992). Copyright© 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Init. reserved. WARNING: This AIAO Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:44:55 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. 0�` User Notes: (1413886318) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 313 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 314 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 315 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 316 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 317 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 318 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 319 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 320 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 321 of 475 Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 9. § 9.1.7 Additional documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are: .1 AIA Document At 32TM-2009, Exhibit A, Determination of the Cost of the Work, if applicable. .2 AIA Document E201TM-2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .3 AIA Document E202TM-2008, Building Information Modeling Protocol Exhibit, if completed, or the following: N/A .4 Other documents, if any, listed below: (List here any additional documents which are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forms and the Contractor's bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless enumerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Documents.) All binding documents including the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Bidders, Supplemental Instructions to Bidders, Bid Proposal Forms, and the Project Schedule are intended to be part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A232-2009 General Conditions Exhibit A, Contract Document Schedule dated December 21, 2017 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009 as modified Refer to Supplemental Conditions modifying AIA Document A232-2009 for changes and additions to Article 11 "Insurance and Bonds". Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liabilityfor insurance required in Article I1 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreemen 's entered -i of the day and year first written above. OWNER (Signal ONTRACTOR (Signature) Tammy de Weerd , Mayor Nicole Stoddard, VP Sales (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document A132TM —2009 (formerly A101 TMCMa —1992). Copyright m 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIAm Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:46:12 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and Is not for resale. User Notes: (1228486226) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 323 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 324 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 325 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 326 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 327 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 328 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 329 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 330 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 331 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 332 of 475 This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written abo s t OWN R (Signatc CONTRACTOR Sign ure) Tammy de Weerd , Mayor Greg Marshall, Senior Project Manager (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document A132T —2009 (formerly A101 TmCMa —1992). Copyright ©1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Init. reserved. WARNING: This AIAI) Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIAO Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:46:56 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. t (1667642703) lser Notes: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 334 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 335 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 336 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 337 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 338 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 339 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 340 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 341 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 342 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 343 of 475 This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. NER (Signature) Tammy de Weerd , Mayor (Printed name and title) 1 CONT TOR (i ttn•e) J to Davi t -Tally -E 044, (Printed name and title) AIA Document A132TM — 2009 (formerly All 01 TMCMa —1992). Copyright © 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights \� Init. reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIM' Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 11:17:30 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902-1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (861172076) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 345 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 346 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 347 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 348 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 349 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 350 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 351 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 352 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 353 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 354 of 475 Exhibit A, Contract Document Schedule dated December 21, 2017 ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article I 1 of AIA Document A232-2009 as modified Refer to Supplemental Conditions modifying AIA Document A232-2009 for changes and additions to Article 11 "Insurance and Bonds". Contractor is required to provide 100% Payment and Performance Bonds. (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liability far insurance required in Article 11 of AIA Document A232-2009.) Type of Insurance or Bond Limit of Liability or Bond Amount ($0.00) This Agreement is entered -into -as -of the and year first written above. OWNER (Signature) CO TRACTOR (Signature) ol/ -w /Z/,?/ / 6V1VVL V Tammy de Weerd , Mayor Mark McKibben, President (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document A132TU —2009 (formerly A101 T"CMa —1992). Copyright© 1975, 1980, 1992 and 2009 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights Init. reserved. WARNING: This AIA'9 Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution 9 of this AIA Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:47:46 on 12/22/2017 under Order No.5739062902_1 which expires on 01/01/2018, and is not for resale. (1479501425) User Notes: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 356 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 357 of 475 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 7C Project/File Number: Item Title: City Council Department Liaison and Commission Appointments 1. Resolution No. 18-2056: A Resolution Of The Mayor And The City Council Of The City Of Meridian Approving City Council President's Appointments Of City Council Members To Serve As Department Liaisons, Committee Members, Commission Ex - Officio Members, And City Area Contacts, And Providing An Effective Date. Meetina Notes 5 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. I ✓ `� �� BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN APPROVING CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT'S APPOINTMENTS OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE AS DEPARTMENT LIAISONS, COMMITTEE MEMBERS, COMMISSION EX -OFFICIO MEMBERS, AND CITY AREA CONTACTS, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Meridian City Code section 1-7-6(A), the president of the City Council is to appoint a city council member to be council liaison of each of the City departments as well as ad-hoc internal committees, and at the City Council meeting on January 9, 2018, City Council President Joe Borton did make such appointments, as set forth in Exhibit,4 hereto; WHEREAS, City Council members are authorized to represent the City of Meridian at, or attend on behalf of the City of Meridian, the meetings of various interagency boards, committees, and initiatives, including the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho, the Ada County Air Quality Board, the Meridian Rural Fire District Board, Meridian Development Corporation, Allumbaugh House Joint Powers Entity, Ada City -County Emergency Management Executive Council, and Valley Regional Transit Board; WHEREAS, pursuant to Meridian City Code section 2-1-1(C)(9), each commission shall include a City Council member to serve in an ex -officio, non-voting capacity, and at the City Council meeting on January 9, 2019, City Council President Joe Borton did make such appointments, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; WHEREAS, in order to facilitate timely public service, there are designated five City areas, and at the City Council meeting on January 9, 2018, City Council President Joe Borton did delegate to each City Council member primary responsibility for responding to citizen inquiries originating from that City area, as set forth in Exhibits A and B hereto; and WHEREAS, by this resolution, the City Council of the City of Meridian seeks to effectuate and memorialize these appointments; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the City Council members appointed by City Council President Borton to serve as liaisons to the respective departments, as set forth in ExhibitA hereto, shall fulfill the duties of such function as enumerated in Meridian City Code section 1-7-6(B). Section 2. That the City Council members appointed by City Council President Borton to serve as ex -officio members of the respective commissions, as set forth in Exhibit,4 hereto, shall fulfill the duties of such function as enumerated in Meridian City Code section 2-1-1(C)(9). RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY COUNCIL LIAISONS AND REPRESENTATIVES PAGE I OF 4 Section 3. That the City Council members appointed by City Council President Borton to serve as contact persons for the respective City areas, as set forth in Exhibits A and B hereto, shall have primary responsibility for responding to citizen inquiries originating from those respective City areas. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this q day of January, 2018. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this I day of January, 2018. eAPPR Mayor Ta de rd ATTEST: RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY COUNCIL LIAISONS AND REPRESENTATIVES PAGE 2 OF 4 RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY COUNCIL LIAISONS AND REPRESENTATIVES PAGE 3 OF 4 EXHIBIT A CITY COUNCIL MEMBER APPOINTMENTS Seat Council Member Department Liaison Appointment Committee and Commission Appointment City Area Designation 1 Anne Little Roberts alittleroberts@meridiancity.org c: 208-861-4799 Police Historic Preservation Commission (ex officio) Ada County Air Quality Board 3 2 Joe Borton jborton@meridiancity.org c: 208-870-3764 Mayor, Clerk, Finance, IT Internal – City Legislative Committee Allumbaugh House (alternate) COMPASS (alternate) ACEM (alternate) 3 Ty Palmer typalmer@meridiancity.org c: 208-954-6432 Fire, Community Development Meridian Rural Fire District Board EMS JPA (alternate ) 4 4 Treg Bernt tbernt@meridiancity.org c: 208-409-7400 Parks Parks & Recreation Commission (ex officio) Internal - Golf Course Committee 1 5 Genesis Milam gmilam@meridiancity.org c: 208-371-6009 Legal, HR Arts Commission (ex officio) Solid Waste Advisory Commission (ex officio) VRT Board 2 6 Luke Cavener lcavener@meridiancity.org c: 208-695-4536 Public Works Transportation Commission ex officio Internal – City Legislative Committee (alternate) VRT Board 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 361 of 475 RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY COUNCIL LIAISONS AND REPRESENTATIVES PAGE 4 OF 4 EXHIBIT B CITY AREAS Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 362 of 475 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 8A Project/File Number: Ordinance No. 18-1760: An Ordinance To Amend The Municipal Code Of The City Of Meridian, County Of Ada, State Of Idaho, Amending Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12(E)(2), Meridian City Code, Known As The Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance Fee Schedule; To Provide For An Amendment To The Police, Fire, And Parks And Recreation Impact Fee Schedules; And Providing An Effective Date. This is a second reading of this ordinance only. Public hearing for this item will be held on January 16, 2018. Meetinq Notes IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 1 of 5 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, MILAM, PALMER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 7, SECTION 12(E)(2), MERIDIAN CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE MERIDIAN IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE FEE SCHEDULE; TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE POLICE, FIRE, AND PARKS AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted in Section 67-8201, et seq., Idaho Code, the City of Meridian ("the City") may impose Impact Fees to fund expenditures by the City Police Department, the City Fire Department and the City Parks and Recreation Department on Capital Improvements needed to serve new growth and development; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of March, 2014 The City Council of the City of Meridian adopted the current Impact Fee Schedule as Ordinance 14-1596; and, WHEREAS, the Impact Fees adopted by Ordinance 14-1596 were less than the maximum allowable fee under the City’s currently adopted methodology and Capital Improvements Plan, which necessitates the use of general fund revenue or other income sources to fund the difference between the maximum allowable fee and the adopted fee; and WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee met with the Meridian City Council on December 12, 2017 and recommended that the City Council consider adopting the maximum allowable fee under the City’s currently adopted methodology and Capital Improvements Plan; and WHEREAS, after due and timely notice, the City Council held a public hearing on January 16, 2018 to discuss, review and hear public comments on the proposed amendments to the Impact Fee Schedule as recommended by the Development Impact Fee Committee; and WHEREAS, based upon the previously adopted Capital Improvements Plan, the testimony at the public hearing, and a review of all of the facts and circumstances, in the reasonable judgment of the City Council, the police, fire, and parks and recreation Impact Fees hereby established are at levels no greater than necessary to defray the cost of Capital Improvements directly related to the categories of residential and nonresidential land Development listed herein; and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 364 of 475 IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, in adopting the police, fire, and parks and recreation Capital Improvements Impact Fees, the City Council intends and has determined that such Impact Fees are designed to and do address Capital Improvements needs that are brought about by new growth and development, which needs are separate and distinct from the impacts and needs addressed by other requirements of the City's codes and ordinances, and in no circumstance do the Impact Fees set forth herein address the same subjects as other requirements of the City's codes and ordinances for site specific dedications or improvements; and WHEREAS, the police, fire, and parks and recreation Impact Fees, as revised, to be imposed on new growth and development will be and are hereby legislatively adopted, will be generally applicable to a broad class of property and are intended to defray the projected impacts on such Capital Improvements caused by new growth and development as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Impact Fees adopted hereby shall be collected and accounted for in accordance with Section 67-8201, et seq., Idaho Code; and WHEREAS, the Impact Fees adopted by this Ordinance are fair and rational, charge new growth and development according to new growth and development's impact on the City's police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities and benefit those who pay Impact Fees in a tangible way. BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and incorporated herein by this reference as findings of the City Council, along with the recitals in Ordinance 14-1596 pertaining to the adoption of the current Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan. Section 2. That Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12(E)(2) of the Meridian City Code is amended in part as follows: 10-7-12: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: E. 2. Except for such impact fee as may be calculated, paid and accepted pursuant to an independent impact fee calculation study, the amount of each impact fee shall be as follows effective the _____ day of _________, 2018: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 365 of 475 IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 3 of 5 Police impact fee schedule: Residential – Single Family Residential - Multifamily $135.72 $223.00 $135.72 $223.00 per dwelling unit Nonresidential .07 .12 per square foot Fire impact fee schedule: Residential – Single Family Residential - Multifamily $551.07 $681.00 $551.07 $681.00 per dwelling unit Nonresidential .29 .35 per square foot Parks impact fee schedule: Residential – Single Family Residential - Multifamily $1,0803.72 $1,113.00 $767.52 $1,113.00 per dwelling unit Nonresidential n/a Total fees: Residential – Single Family Residential - Multifamily $1,767.51 $2,017.00 $1,454.31 $2,017.00 per dwelling unit Nonresidential .36 .47 per square foot Section 3: That all other provisions of Title 10, Chapter 7 remain unchanged. Section 4: This Fee Schedule shall be in effect on the _____ day of _______, 2018, which shall be no sooner than thirty (30) days after adoption and publication of this Ordinance. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this_____ day of __________, 2018. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 366 of 475 IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 4 of 5 APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ____ day of ___________, 2018. APPROVED: ______________________________ Tammy de Weerd, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ C.Jay Coles, City Clerk Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 367 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 368 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 369 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 370 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 371 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 372 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 373 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 374 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 375 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 376 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 377 of 475 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 378 of 475 BBC RESEARCH CONSULTING Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvement Plans City of Meridian FINAL REPORT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 379 of 475 Final Report November 20, 2013 City of Meridian Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvement Plans Prepared for City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Prepared by BBC Research & Consulting 1999 Broadway, Suite 2200 Denver, Colorado 80202-9750 303.321.2547 fax 303.399.0448 www.bbcresearch.com bbc@bbcresearch.com V V~ RESEARCH CONSULTING Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 380 of 475 Table of Contents Report Background and Objectives .....................................................................1 Definition of Impact Fees ........................................................................1 Land Use and Demographics ...................................................................6 Impact Fee Calculations Considerations .................................................9 Current Assets and Capital Improvements Plans ....................................10 Mechanics of Fee Calculations ................................................................19 City Participation .....................................................................................22 Cash Flow Analysis ...................................................................................25 Other Funding Sources ............................................................................26 Implementation Recommendations .......................................................27 Summary .................................................................................................28 Appendices A. Minimum Standards and Requirements for Development Impact Fee Ordinances B. Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance C. Impact Fee Ordinance Checklist D. Collier's Year- End Real Estate Market Review E. Detailed Demographic Analysis F. Collier's Year- End Real Estate Market Review G. Meridian FY 2014-2024 CIP BBC RESEARCH & CONSULTING Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 381 of 475 This report regarding impact fees for the City of Meridian (Meridian or City) is organized into the following sections: An overview of the report's background and objectives; A definition of impact fees and a discussion of their appropriate use; An overview of land use and demographics; A step-by-step calculation of impact fees under the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) approach; A calculation of the City's monetary participation in those capital improvements defined as requiring repair, replacement or an upgrade, and the City's pro rata share of partially growth-related capital improvements; A cash flow analysis; A list of implementation recommendations; and A brief summary of conclusions Each section follows sequentially. We have also attached several appendices with supporting documentation: Appendix A. Minimum Standards and Requirements for Development Impact Fees Ordinances; Appendix B. Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance; Appendix C. Impact Fee Ordinance Checklist; Appendix D. Current Service Standard Approach; Appendix E. Detailed Demographic Analysis; Appendix F. Colliers' Year-End Real Estate Market Review; and Appendix G. Meridian FY 2014-FY2024 CIP. Background and Objectives The City hired BBC Research & Consulting (BBC) in August 2013 to update impact fees for police, fire, and parks and recreation capital improvements. This document presents the full cost recovery fees based on the City's demographic data and infrastructure costs before credit adjustment; calculates the City's monetary participation; examines the likely cash flow produced by the recommended fee amount; and outlines specific fee implementation recommendations. Definition of Impact Fees Impact fees are generally defined as one-time assessments used to recover the capital costs borne by local governments due to new growth and development. Impact fees are governed by principles established in Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code, known as the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act (Impact Fee Act), attached as Appendix A, which specifically gives cities, towns and counties the authority to levy impact fees. The Idaho Code defines an impact fee as "... a BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 382 of 475 payment of money imposed as a condition of development approval to pay for a proportionate share of the cost of system improvements needed to serve development."t Purpose of impact fees. The Impact Fee Act repeats the legislative finding that "... an equitable program for planning and financing public facilities needed to serve new growth and development is necessary in order to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development and to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the state of Idaho."z Idaho fee restrictions and requirements. The Impact Fee Act places numerous restrictions on the calculation and use of impact fees, all of which help ensure that local governments adopt impact fees that are consistent with federal law.3 Some of those restrictions include: Impact fees shall not be used for any purpose other than to defray system improvement costs incurred to provide additional public facilities to serve new growth;^ Impact fees must be expended within 8 years from the date they are collected. Fees maybe held in certain circumstances beyond the 8-year time limit if the governmental entity can provide reasonable causes Impact fees must not exceed the proportionate share of the cost of capital improvements needed to serve new growth and development;b Impact fees must be maintained in one or more interest-bearing accounts within the capital projects fund. t See Section 67-8203(9), Idaho Code. "System improvements" are capital improvements (i.e., improvements with a useful life of 10 years or more) that, in addition to a long life, increase the service capacity of a public facility. Public facilities include: parks, open space and recreation areas, and related capital improvements; and public safety facilities, including law enforcement, Eire, emergency medical and rescue facilities. See Sections 67-8203(3), (24) and (Z8), Idaho Code. z See Section 67-8202, Idaho Code. As explained further in this study, proportionality is the foundation of a legal impact fee. To meet substantive due process requirements, an impact fee must provide a rational relationship (or nexus) between the impact fee assessed against new development and the actual need for additional capital improvements. An impact fee must substantially advance legitimate local government interests. This relationship must be of "rough proportionality." Adequate consideration of the factors outlined in Section 67-8207(2) ensure that rough proportionality is reached. See Banbury Development Corp. v. South Jordaa, 631 P.2d 899 (1981); Dollan v. Crty ofTigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994). h See Sections 67-8202(4) and 67-8203 (29), Idaho Code. S See Section 67-8Z 10(4), Idaho Code. 6 See Sections 67-8204(1) and 67-8207, Idaho Code. See Section 67-8210(1), Idaho Code. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 383 of 475 In addition, the Impact Fee Act requires the following: Establishment of and consultation with a development impact fee advisory committee Advisory Committee);$ Identification of all existing public facilities; Determination of a standardized measure (or service unit) of consumption of public facilities; Identification of the current level of service that existing public facilities provide; Identification of the deficiencies in the existing public facilities; Forecast of residential and nonresidential growth;9 Identification of the growth-related portion of City Capital Improvement Plans;to Analysis of cash flow stemming from impact fees and other capital improvement funding sources;tt Implementation of recommendations such as impact fee credits, how impact fee revenues should be accounted for, and how the impact fees should be updated over time;1z Preparation and adoption of a Capital Improvement Plan pursuant to state law and public hearings regarding the same;13 and Preparation and adoption of an ordinance authorizing impact fees pursuant to state law and public hearings regarding the same.l'~ The proposed update to the Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance, which is the ordinance that will amend the City's municipal code, is attached as Appendix B. A checklist for ordinance requirements is found in Appendix C. How Should fees be Calculated? State law requires the City to implement the Capital Improvement Plan methodology to calculate impact fees. The City could implement fees of any amount not exceeding the maximum fees calculated by the CIP approach. This methodology requires the City to describe its service area, forecast the land uses, densities and population that will occur in that service area over the next 20 years, and identify the capital improvements that See Section 67-8205, Idaho Code. 9 See Sectia~ 67-8206(Z), Idaho Code. 10 See Section 67-8208, Idaho Code. tt See Section 67-8207, Idaho Code. tz See Sections 67-8209 and 67-8Z 10, Idaho Code. t3 See Section 67-8208, Idaho Code. th See Sections 67-8204 and 67-8206, Idaho Code. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 384 of 475 will be needed to serve the forecasted growth at the same level of service found in the existing community. 15 This list and cost of capital improvements, along with a time schedule for commencing and completing the construction of all capital improvements, constitutes the capital improvement element to be adopted as part of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan.16 Only those items listed on the CIP are eligible to be funded by impact fees. Each governmental entity intending to adopt an impact fee must first prepare a capital improvements plan.t~ To ensure that impact fees are adopted and spent for capital improvements in support of the community's needs and planning goals, the Impact Fee Act establishes a link between the authority to charge impact fees and certain planning requirements of Idaho's Local Land Use Planning Act (LLUPA). The local government must have adopted a comprehensive plan per LLUPA procedures, and that comprehensive plan must be updated to include a current capital improvement element.l$ This study considers the planned capital improvements for the period between 2013 and 2023 that will need to be adopted as an element of the Comprehensive Plan. Once the essential capital planning has taken place, impact fees can be calculated. The Impact Fee Act places many restrictions on the way impact fees are calculated and spent, particularly via the principal that local governments cannot charge new development more than a proportionate share" of the cost of public facilities to serve that new growth. "Proportionate share" is defined as "...that portion of the cost of system improvements ...which reasonab]y relates to the service demands and needs of the project."19 Practically, this concept requires Meridian to carefully project future growth and estimate capital improvement costs so that it prepares reasonable and logical impact fee schedules. The proportionate share concept is designed to ensure that impact fees: are calculated by measuring the needs created for capital improvements by the development being charged the impact fee; do not exceed the cost of such improvements; and are "earmarked" so as to benefit those that pay the impact fees. is As a comparison and benchmark for the impact fees calculated under the Capital Improvement Plan approach, BBC also calculated the City's current level of service by quantifying the City's current investment in capital improvements for each impact fee category, allocating a portion of these assets to residential and nonresidential development, and dividing the resulting amount by current housing units (residential fees) or current square Footage (nonresidential fees). By using current assets to denote the current service standard, this methodology guards against using fees to correct existing deficiencies. The calculation of the C ity's current level of service is found in Appendix D and this investment in capital improvements for police, Fire, and parks and recreation is referenced throughout this report. t6 See Sections 67-8203(4) and 67-8208, Idaho Code. Section 67-8208, Idaho Code. See Appendix A for a description of the requirements of the Impact Fee Act for the capital improvements plan. t8 See Sections 67-8203 (4) and 67-8208, Idaho Code t9 See Section 67-8203(23), Idaho Code. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 385 of 475 There are various approaches to calculating impact fees and to crediting new development for past and future contributions made toward system improvements. The Impact Fee Act does not specify a single type of fee calculation, but it does specify that the formula be "reasonable and fair." Impact Fees must take into account the Following: Any appropriate credit, offset or contribution of money, dedication of ]and, or construction of system improvements; Payments reasonably anticipated to be made by or as a result of a new development in the form of user fees and debt service payments; That portion of general tax and other revenues allocated by Meridian to system improvements; and All other available sources of funding such system improvements.20 Through data analysis and interviews with City staff, BBC identified the share of each capital asset needed to serve growth. The total projected capital improvements needed to serve growth are then allocated to residential and nonresidential development with the resulting amounts divided by growth projections from 2013 to 2023. This is consistent with the Impact Fee Act.zt However, only residential development is charged parks and recreation impact fees since households are the primary consumers of park services. Among the advantages of the CIP approach is its establishment of a spending plan to give developers and new residents more certainty about the use of the particular impact fee revenues. Other fee calculation considerations. The basic CIP methodology used in the fee calculations is presented above. However, implementing this methodology requires a number of decisions. The considerations accounted for in the fee calculations include the following: The allocation of costs is made using a service unit which is "a standard measure of consumption, use, generation or discharge attributable to an individual unit22 of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards for a particular category of capital improvement."23 The service units chosen by the study team are all linked directly to residential dwelling units or nonresidential development square feet. zo See Section 67-8207, Idaho Code. zt The impact fee that can be charged to each service unit (in this study, residential dwelling units and nonresidential square feet) cannot exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of capital improvements for system improvements attributable to new development to provide an adopted service level by the total number of service units attributable to new development. See Sections 67-8204(16), 67-8208(1 (f) and 67-8208(1)(g), Idaho Code. 22 See Section 67-8203(27), Idaho Code. zs See Section 67-8203(27), Idaho Code. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 386 of 475 A second consideration involves refinement of cost allocations to different land uses. According to Idaho Code, the CIP must include a "conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial, agricultural and industrial."z'~ In this analysis, the study team has chosen to use the highest level of detail supportable by available data and, as a result in this study, impact fees are allocated between aggregated residential (i.e., all forms of residential housing) and nonresidential development (all nonresidential uses including retail, office, agricultural and industrial). Land Use and Demographics In calculating the impact fees, it was necessary to allocate capital improvement costs to both residential and nonresidential development. The study team performed this allocation based on the number of projected new households and nonresidential square footage added from 2013 through 2023. Pursuant to Idaho State law, we gathered data on 20-year land use assumptions in Meridian, including population, households and employment. See Appendix E for the 20-year forecasts to 2033. However, the impact fee calculations in this report are based on the next 10 years of land use data to maintain consistency with Meridian's CIP planning horizon. Residential data. The primary data sources for residential unit counts and square footage numbers are the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS); the City of Meridian; the U.S. Census Bureau. Appendix E provides COMPASS' demographic spreadsheets and details any calculations performed by the study team to arrive at current or projected residential data. Current and future households. To estimate the current and future number of households in the City, the study team used household estimates from COMPASS' document entitled Communities in Motion 2040 Vision Forecast by DemographicAreas updated in 2010. This document provides detailed data (from 2010 to 2040 in five year increments) on population, households and jobs by three Meridian-specific sub areas (North Meridian, Central Meridian and South Meridian). BBC then adjusted the population for these demographic areas down slightly to reflect the population estimates within the city limits as estimated in the COMPASS document 1990-2013 Population Estimates by City Limit Boundaries. See Appendix E for a detailed discussion of the derivation of the current and future household numbers and COMPASS' Community Choices Forecast spreadsheet. Single family/multifamily distribution. Communities in Motion was the basis for the allocation of future housing units between single family and multifamily units. Communities in Motion is the Regional Long-Range Transportation Plan for the Treasure Valley to 2040. The Communities in Motion working group collaborated with COMPASS to estimate housing units by type in the Treasure Valley. This report forecasts that Treasure Valley will eventually be 55 percent single zh See Section 67-8208(1)(e), Idaho Code. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 387 of 475 family and 45 percent multifamily housing units (see Appendix F). However based on previous discussions the City's Planning Department, the study team concluded that this distribution would not be appropriate given recent construction activity. Therefore, in the interim, we believe it is appropriate for the allocation of future housing units in Meridian to be based on city building permit trend data provided to BBC during the analysis. Based on this data, BBC assumed future residential growth will be 75 percent single family and 25 percent multifamily. This housing type distinction is only necessary for calculating residential square footage, a precursor to fee calculations, as discussed below. The impact fees in this report are equivalent for single family and multifamily units. Current and future square footage. In order to distribute the costs for capital improvements to new residential and nonresidential development, a precursor to the calculation of impact fees, it was necessary to estimate the current and future total square footage of residential and nonresidential units in the City. In addition, square footage data are used to calculate the growth-related percentage of certain capital improvements that are only partially necessitated by growth. The particular capital improvements referenced in this study that are only partially growth-related are the police training center, Story Park development, Rails with Trails, and the Recreation Center. The calculations of the growth-related percentage of these capital improvements are found on page 11. Based on national data, BBC used figures of 2,210 square feet for single family units and 1,127 square feet for multifamily units.25 These estimates reflect the average of national annual median square foot figures from 2007 to 2012 and represent the best available data. Figure 1 on the next page presents the number of current (2013) and projected (2023) single Family and multifamily units, and respective square footage estimates. zs US Census Bureau, average figures from 2D07-2012, Median and Average Square Feet of F1oorArea in New Single Family Houses Completed by Location and Median and Average Square Feet of FloorArea in Units in New Multifamily Buildings Completed. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 388 of 475 Figure 1. Current and Projected Residential Development, City of Meridian Housing Unitsil) Single Family Multifamily Total Housing Units Square Feet Iz) Single Family (units * 2,210 sq.ft.) Multifamily (units * 1,127 sq.ft.) Total Square Feet 24,150 30,274 6,124 2,994 5,036 2,041 27,144 35,310 8,165 53,150,096 66,628,243 13,478,147 3,375,518 5,676,823 2,301,305 56,525,614 72,305,066 15,779,452 1) COMPASS for housing units and City of Meridian for allocation of units between single family and multifamily. 2) US Census 5-year trailing average for square footage. Source: COMPASS, U.S. Census Bureau. Currently, there are an estimated 27,144 housing units in the City of Meridian, 24,150 of which are single family units and 2,994 of which are multifamily units. By 2023 the residential housing stock is projected to have increased by 30 percent (8,615 households) for a total of over 35,000 units. Nonresidential data. Colliers' Idaho: Boise and Nampa, 2012 Year-End Real Estate Market Review, tabulates existing office, retail and industrial square footage for cities in the Treasure Valley. The report, located in Appendix G, discusses various submarkets in the Valley, including the City of Meridian, and lists current nonresidential square footage, vacancy rates, building counts, market rents, etc. BBC totaled the retail, office and industrial square footage to arrive at a base number of nonresidential square feet in Meridian. This base number was used to calculate the total current and projected nonresidential square footage in the City. Current nonresidential development. As discussed with Colliers, the Year-End Real Estate Market Review square footage count only includes buildingsgreater than 5,000 square feet. To adjust for this underestimate of nonresidential square feet, BBC obtained City data on the square footage of new commercial development since 2009. The City's data are not a cumulative total of all square footage in the City; rather the data only reflect the square footage of new permitted nonresidential units. BBC calculated the percentage of new units since 2009 that were less than 5,000 square feet in size. As of August 2013, on average, 5 percent of the City's newly permitted nonresidential units were less than 5,000 square feet. Knowing this, Colliers tabulation represents 95 percent of the actual nonresidential square feet in Meridian. By dividing Colliers square footage by 95 percent, the study team arrived at the current total of nonresidential square feet in Meridian. This method generates a total of 9,965,834 nonresidential square feet in 2013. See Appendix E for a detailed step-by-step calculation of the current nonresidential square feet. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE S Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 389 of 475 Future nonresidential development. ~1o data exist for exact 2023 projections of nonresidential square footage in Meridian. Therefore, BBC developed a logical method for calculating future nonresidential square footage. COMPASS' document, Communities in Motion 2040 Vision Forecast by Demographic Areas, provides data on current and future jobs in Meridian. Based on the current nonresidential data, the study team developed a ratio of nonresidential square feet per employee. This ratio is used to project nonresidential square footage to 2023. Currently, there are 23,213 jobs in Meridian. According to the methodology described above, current nonresidential square feet tota19,965,834. Dividing the square footage by the number of jobs in 2013 produces a ratio of 429 square feet per employee in 2013.26 COMPASS' report also projects jobs in 2023. Therefore, assuming the ratio of square feet to employee remains constant, the study team used this ratio, as described above, to project nonresidential square footage forward. The estimated number of jobs in 2023 (30,908) is multiplied by the square footage per employee (429). This produces a total of 13,269,278 nonresidential square feet in 2023. See Appendix E for a detailed step-by-step calculation of the future nonresidential square feet. Figure 2 below shows the current and projected nonresidential development square feet. Figure 2. Current and Projected Nonresidential Development Note: Total in 2013 9,965,834 Assumes that nonresidential square footage grows in proportion to employment 429 square feet peremployeei. Total in 2023 13,269,278 Source: COMPASS, Colliers Year End Real Estate Market Review, 2012, City of Meridian and BBC. Difference (2013 to 2023) 3,303,444 Using the methodology described above, the increase in nonresidential square footage from 2013 to 2023 is approximately 3.3 million square feet. Impact Fee Calculation Considerations The fees calculated under the CIP approach were based on the following: City investments in police, fire, and parks and recreation capital improvements projected to be built from 2013 through 2023; An allocation of investment to residential and nonresidential development, based on new residential dwellingunits and nonresidential square footage; and A fee calculation that involves dividing the appropriate share of capital improvements by projected residential units and nonresidential square feet. z~ This ratio of square footage per employee may change over time, and can be adjusted in future impact fee updates. The 429 square feet per employee is the study team's best estimate given the available data. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 390 of 475 Current Assets and Capital Improvement Plans The CIP approach estimates future capital improvement investments required to serve growth over a fixed period of time. The Impact Fee Act calls for the CIP to "...project demand for system improvements required by new service units ... over a reasonable period of time not to exceed 20 years."27 BBC recommends a 10-year time period based on the City's best available capital planning data. The types of costs eligible for inclusion in this calculation include any land purchases, construction of new facilities and expansion of existing facilities to serve growth over the next 10 years at existing service levels. Equipment with a useful life of 10 years or more is also impact fee eligible under the Impact Fee Act. The total cost of improvements over the 10 years is referred to as the "CIP Value" in Figures 5, 7 and 9. The cost of this impact fee study is also impact fee eligible for all impact fee categories. Because impact fees are calculated for three impact fee categories in this study (i.e., police, fire, and parks and recreation), 33 percent of the study's cost is included in all calculations. Additionally, for all three categories, the City's current impact fee fund balance is subtracted From the total CIP value. The existing fund balance will be used to pay for a portion of the future capital improvements and will therefore decrease the amount needed to be collected from future impact fees. In the study team's judgment, the City is obligated to expend this existing fund balance onpre-planned growth-related capital improvements before spending future impact fee receipts on newly identified projects in the following CIPs.2B The forward-looking 10-year CIPs for the police and parks and recreation departments each include some facilities that are only partially necessitated by growth BBC spoke with each department to determine a logical metric for including a portion of these facilities in the impact fee calculations. The capital improvements mentioned immediately above are calculated to be 22 percent growth-related. The 22 percent ratio is calculated by dividing the accumulated new square footage between 2013 and 2023 (residential and nonresidential) by the total square footage in 2023.29 This percentage is attributed to growth under the philosophy that growth caused the need for such facilities and vehicles, and this growth also necessitates building a proportionately larger facility to accommodate additional personnel (which would otherwise not be necessary with the existing population). For example, the proposed police training center and the community/recreation center construction should be sized according to population and peak period demand. The City needs to size these facilities and vehicles to be able to accommodate the demand created by current residents and demand of future residents. 27 See Section 67-8208(1)(h). 2e "Collected development impact fees must be expended within eight (8) years from the date they were collected, on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis ...." See Section 67-8210(4), Idaho Code. Funds collected prior to July 1, 2006, must be expended within Five (5) years from the date they were collected, on afirst-in, first-out (FIFO) basis. z9 The residential square footage is described in Figure 1 and the nonresidential square footage is described in Figure Z. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 391 of 475 It should be understood that growth will be paying only a portion of the cost of these facilities. The City will need to plan to fund the pro rata share of these partially growth-related capital improvements with revenue sources other than impact fees within the time frame that impact fees must be spent. As discussed later in this report, the value of this City participation investment is approximately $40.9 million over the next ten years, or more than $3.7 million per year. This investment includes almost $30.5 million of discretionary funding in connection with purely non-growth-related improvements, and nearly $10.4 million of capital improvements which are growth-related and therefore must be funded from the City's General Funds. These funds could come from City revenues, donations, grants or other partnerships. It should also be noted that certain CIP capital improvements are listed in the following figures as zero percent growth-related because City staff relayed that the proposed capital improvements were actually either entirely repair and replacement of existing facilities or represented an upgrade in service levels not triggered by new growth. These non-growth- relatedcapital improvements are listed, nonetheless, in the CIP because municipalities often use the CIP for planning purposes, not just to calculate impact fees. Meridian may find this inclusion in the CIP exhibits useful. Levels of service. Levels of service (sometimes referred to in this study as "service level(s)") must be defined in the capital improvement element of the Comprehensive Plan, and is the basis for establishing additional service capacity need in any system that serves new development. Level of service" is "... a measure of the relationship between service capacity and service demand for public facilities."30 Service levels need to be stated in quantifiable, specific terms, since they measure the benefit new development receives for payment of impact fees. The capital improvement element must clearly identify existing public facilities and service levels and identify any shortfalls in service levels, if at all. Any such shortfall or "deficiency" that Meridian intends to overcome for both existing and new development cannot be funded with impact fees. Likewise, the cost of raising the service level for existing and future development beyond the current service level is ineligible for impact fee funding. If Meridian desires to use impact fees to achieve a higher service level for new development than existing service levels, Meridian must, outside of impact fees, raise the money to bring the existing community to that higher service level as well. This restriction has a general effect of restraining the setting of unreasonably high standards and fees solely for new development. All of the capital improvement costs in the CIPs on the following pages represent improvements that are needed for growth to maintain the current level of service. The City maybe operating at a less than desirab]e level (i.e., operating with deficiencies). In the future, the City may plan to increase the level of service. If this is the case, any capital improvements that increase the current level of service are not impact fee eligible and have been purposely excluded from the calculations. The police department is currently operating at a stated level of service of with 1.10 sworn officers per 1,000 residents based on the full employment at 87 sworn officers and 26 non sworn so See Section 67-8203(17), Idaho Code. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 392 of 475 staff members. The actual level of service has historically been lower due to frictional hiring difficulties. The capacity of police calls, initiated by both the police and the public, has also been increasing over time. See Figure 3. This is due to an increase in total population, population density, and crime rate. Because of the pressures that growth places on the police services there are capital improvements required to maintain the level of service to current standards which are impact fee eligible. The police department has recently focused on finding efficient solutions in order to meet their future infrastructure needs. In particular, the department's locker room, break room, and patrol area spaces are all either at or near capacity. The police department commissioned the design of a station expansion in response to their spatial needs. The department has been able to reduce the projected cost the future station expansion by 50 percent, because the department hired a consultant in order to efficiently utilize the existing spaces. Additionally, the police department plans to use space within the proposed training center to meet growth related office and meeting space needs. These plans to relocate and expand in the new facility have minimized the cost of the station expansion. Figure 3. Police Calls for Service, 2006-2013 60,000 40,000 20,000 Officer Initiated Calls Note: 2013 totals based on existing data extrapolated to year end. Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research & Consulting. Public ]nltiated Calls Likewise, the fire department must build new infrastructure in order to maintain its current level of service as Meridian continues to grow. The current and targeted level of fire service is to respond to 80 percent of all calls within six minutes (i.e., one minute "turn out" time and five minutes in transit). BBC analyzed the ratio of fire infrastructure for the city's current and projected land uses and, in conjunction with discussions with members of the finance department, determined that the fire department CIP lists more capital improvements than are necessary to continue this level of service. Therefore, the proposed fire station #8 and the corresponding apparatus cannot be included in the fee calculations. While they are shown on the C[P they are subtracted from the total eligible fee amount. Only growth-related capital BBC RESEARCH & CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 12 20D6 2007 2008 2D09 2010 2011 2012 2013t Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 393 of 475 improvements necessary for the continuation of the current level of service are shown to be impact fee eligible. The parks and recreation has plans to increase the level of service in the future. The current level of service is 3.04 acres per 1,000 residents. However the additional 160 acres listed on the CIP represent an increase the level of service to 3.91 acres per 1,000 residents. Of the 160 acres listed on the CIP, 70 acres are impact fee eligible because they are required in order to maintain the current level of service, however the additional 90 cannot be included in the fees. Therefore, the costs associated with developing the additiona190 acres are subtracted from the total impact fee eligible amount. See Appendix D for more details on the calculation. The city also has plans to develop the 77-acre South Meridian Park. The actual development of this park is beyond the 10 year timeframe of the CIP, however, initial work including planning and design and work will take place within the next 10 years and are included in the fee calculations. Current police assets. The provisions of the Impact Fee Act significantly limit the City's use of impact fees. This is particularly true for police service because most costs of serving new development involve adding police officers or patrol vehicles that are not impact fee eligible, even though the demand for added personnel and vehicles might be a direct result of new development. Figure 4 lists the current police assets. The police department is currently operating with 1.10 officers per 1,000 population based on the current employment of 87 officers and 26 support staff. Figure 4. Curent Police Assets source: Police Station (1401 E. Watertower) City of Meridian Police Department. Command VehlCle Police Communications Equipment (198 Radios) K-9 Training Facility K-9 Training Facility Land (2.5 Acres) Crime Scene/ Evidence Van The 1.10 officers per 1,000 population service standard equates to a current investment of $200 per residential unit and $0.10 per nonresidential square foot (see Appendix D for calculation). Police Capital Improvement Plan. Figure 5 on the following page lists the future capital improvements that are necessary to maintain the current level of service (i.e., 1.10 officers per 1,000 population) for future residential units and nonresidential development. The figure presents $2.2 million of future capital improvements that are eligible for inclusion in the police impact fee calculation. The "Amount to Include in Fees" is derived from multiplying the "CIP Value" times the "Growth-Related Portion." BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 13 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 394 of 475 Figure 5. Police 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan Infrastructure Training Center 7,500,000 22 %1,672,484 Station Expansion 800,000 100 800,000 Replace Vehicles ($300,000 annually)3,000,000 0 0 Substation in Fire Station #5 60,000 100 60,000 Future Substation #1 120,000 100 120,000 Future Substation #2 120,000 100 120,000 Future Substation #3 60,000 100 60,000 Total Infrastructure 11,660,000 2,832,484 Fee-Related Research Portion of Impact Fee Study $7,333 100 % $7,333 Minus Impact Fee Fund Balance FY 2013 Beginning Fund Balance $639,687 100 % $639,687 Grand Total $11,027,646 $2,200,130 Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research & Consulting. The police CIP in Figure 5 includes the projected expenditures for four substations which will be located within other, larger facilities such as new fire stations. The precise location of these future substations has not been officially determined. The police department does not need new full size stations, but instead needs smaller police offices throughout the city where personnel can write reports and interact with citizens. The police CIP includes 22 percent of the costs of a new training center. As previously stated, this improvement will serve both the existing population and is also necessary to meet the demands of future growth therefore it is only partially impact fee eligible. This new facility will include a training village and classrooms. It will also be open for use by other public service departments and the local community. Current fire assets. The fire department responds to 84 percent of all calls for service within six minutes (i.e., one minute "turn out" time and five minutes in transit). BBC RESEARCH gc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 395 of 475 Figure 6. Current Fire Assets, 2013 Source: City of Meridian Fire Department. Facilities Fire Station # 1 (540 E. Franklin Rd) Fire Station # 3 (3545 N. Locust Grove) Fire Station # 2 (2401 N. Ten Mile Rd) Fire Station # 4 (2515 S. Eagle Rd) Fire Station # 5 (N. Linder Rd) Training Tower @ Station #1 Fire Safety Center (1901 Leighfield Dr) Vehicles 1982 Pierce Engine (311) 1993 Pierce Engine (304) 2000 Pierce Engine (302) 2002 Pierce Engine (301) 2004 Pierce Engine (303) 2006 Pierce Engine (304) 2008 Pierce Engine (305) 2008 Pierce LADDER (T-31) 2000 International Water Tender (320) 1996 Dodge Squad Vehicle (351) 2009 FORD F550 Brushpumper 1980 GMC Squad Vehicle (341) Command Trailer luipment Opticom Traffic Signal Controls 17 Vehicle Radios 5 Base Station Radios The current level of service equates to a current investment of $510 per residential unit and 0.24 per nonresidential square foot (see Appendix D for calculation). Fire Capital Improvement Plan. The fire department is not currently operating with deficiencies. The fire department's CIP includes improvements which are designed to service areas but would increase the current level of service beyond responding to 80 percent of all calls for service within six minutes (i.e., one minute "turn out" time and five minutes in transit). Therefore, the improvements that would increase the service level, station #8 and the engine for station #8, have been subtracted from the impact fee eligible amount and those that remain represent the improvements necessary to continue of the current level of service. See Appendix D for more details on the calculations. Figure 7 reflects the future fire capital improvements needed to maintain the current level of fire service. BBC RESEARCH gc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT, PAGE 15 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 396 of 475 Figure 7. Fire 10-year Capital Improvement Plan Buildings Fire Station #5 Ito repay Rural Fire)806,DD0 100 %806,000 Fire Station #6 2,230,000 100 2,230,000 Fire Station #7 2,020,000 1D0 2,020,000 Fire Station #8 2,020,000 100 2,020,000 Vehicles Quint Ladder T- Station #4 1,100,000 0 %0 Heavy Rescue Engine Station #6 700,D00 100 700,000 Quint Ladder T for Station #7 1,100,000 100 1,100,000 Fire Engine for Station #8 520,DD0 100 520,000 Fire Engine MF005 520,000 100 520,000 Heavy Rescue Tender 380,D00 0 0 Replace Engine #38 520,DD0 0 0 Replace Engine MF009 520,DD0 0 D Replace Ladder Truck MF021 1,1OD,00D 0 0 Replace Brush MF022 145,DD0 0 0 Replace Engine MF010 520,DD0 0 0 Replace Engine MF014 520,000 0 0 Replace Engine MFD18 520,D00 0 D Equipment Opticom" Traffic Signal Controls 200,DD0 100 %200,000 Replace Air Unit MFDO 98,000 0 0 Replace Breathing Apparatus 380,D00 0 0 Total 2014-2023 CIP 15,919,000 10,116,000 Fee Related Research Impact Fee Study 7,333 100 %7,333 Minus Increase in Level of Service Fire Station #8 and Engine #8t 2,540,000 2,540,000 Minus Impact Fee Fund Balance FY 2013 Beginning Fund Balance 861,861 100 %861,861 Grand Total 12,524,472 6,721,472 Note: t This station was removed in order to maintain the current level of service. Service level calculated by comparing fire stations to developed land uses in the city. Source: City of Meridian, Capital Improvement Plan, and BBC Research & Consulting. The City is expected to purchase $16 million dollars in fire capital improvements, $6.7 million of which is impact fee eligible from 2013 to 2023. Current parks and recreation assets. The total number of currently developed park acres is 245.5, which equates to a service standard of 3.04 acres per 1,000 residents. Figure 8 lists the City's current parks and recreation assets that are responsible for the 3.04 acres per 1,000 residents service standard. BBC RESEARCH gc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 16 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 397 of 475 Figure 8. Current Parks and Recreation Assets, 2013 Source: City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. Paths & Trails Five Mile Creek Path (2.12 Acres) Kiwanis Park to Eagle Road (2 Acres) Blackstone Pathway (1.50 Acres) Sutherland Farm Pathway (1.1 Acres) Fothergill Pathway (1.0 Acre) Locust Grove Pathway (1.0 Acre) Bear Creek Pathway (.25 Acres) Neighborhood & Mini-Parks Gordon Harris/Kiwanis Park (11.1 Acres) Renaissance Park (6.5 Acres) Season's Park (7.1 Acres) Chateau Park(6.7 Acres) 8th Street Park (2.8 Acres) Champion Park (6.0 Acres) Centennial Park (0.4 Acres) Generations Plaza (0.24 Acres) Heritage MS Ball Fields (4 Acres) Bark Park (.8 Acres) Fire Station #4 Park (0.6) City Hall Plaza (0.9) Cox Monument (0.1 Acres) William Watson (7 acres Land only) Community Parks Heroes Park (30.1 Acres) Tully Park (18.5 Acres) Bear Creek Park (18.8 Acres) Storey Park (19.0 Acres) Borup Park (47 acres Land Only) Urban Parks Meridian Settler's Park Developed (56 Acres) Kleiner Park (60 Acres) Meridian Community Center The level of service for parks and recreation equates to a current investment of $2,052 per residential unit (see Appendix D for calculation). Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Plan. Currently, Meridian's 10-year population growth would justify slightly 70 acres of new parks at the current 3.04 developed acres per thousand residents level of service. The CIP lists development of 90 additional acres that are beyond what is necessary to maintain this service level, as described on page 13. Any capital improvements that assist in the augmentation of the service level are not included in the fee calculation. Figure 9 below lists the entire CIP, but the costs associated with the 90 acre increase in the level of service are removed the impact fee eligible value. The three items on the CIP listed as partially growth related are partially included in the fee calculation. The current population will have access to these facilities; however, they are not designed exclusively to increase the current level of service for the existing population. These BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 17 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 398 of 475 facilities will also meet the demand of the future growth, which enables a portion of the costs to be recovered through the impact fee. Park values are calculated at $177,000 per acre. This includes $142,000 for development costs and $35,000 for land costs. These values were calculated from weighted historical data provided by the City. See Appendix D for details on this calculation. For Borup and William Watson parks only the development costs are applied because the land has already been purchased and exists on the list of current infrastructure. Figure 9. Parks and Recreation 10-year Capital Improvement Plan Pathways & Trails Pathway Connections 1,150,000 0 0 Neighborhood & Mini-Parks Isola Creek (7 acres)1,239,000 100 51,239,000 Highlands (7 acres)1,239,000 100 1,239,000 Oaks (7 acres)1,239,000 100 1,239,000 William Watson Development Only (7 acres)994,000 100 994,000 Community Parks Hillsdale (20 acres)3,540,000 100 3,540,000 Borup Park Development Only (47 acres)6,674,000 100 6,674,000 Storey Park (5 acres)885,000 22 197,353 Aldape Construction (60 acres)10,620,000 100 10,620,000 Large Urban Parks South Meridian Park 1,050,000 100 51,050,000 Parks Amenities Rails with Trails 1,000,000 22 222,998 Recreation Center (YMCA Partnership)4,000,000 22 891,991 Equipment Sweeper/Blower 18,000 100 18,000 Truck/Plow 35, 000 100 35, 000 Large Area Mowers(2)110,000 100 110,000 Mules (4)48,000 100 48,000 ATV 12,000 100 12,000 Trailer 7,500 100 7,500 Trim Mowers (5)100,000 100 100,000 Trucks (4)100,000 100 100,000 Tu rf Sprayer 40,000 100 40,000 Ball Field Groomer 10,000 100 10,000 Replace Vehicles and Equipment 2,032,000 0 0 Tota12014-2023 CIP 36,142,500 28,387,842 Fee-Related Research Impact Fee Study 7,333 100 %7,333 Minus Increase in Service Level 90 acres at $177,000t per acre 15,930,000 100 %15,930,000 Minus Impact Fee Fund Balance FY 2013 Beginning Fund Balance 3,378,970 100 %3,378,970 Grand Total 16,840,863 9,086,206 Note: $177,000/acre in land and development costs Source: City of Meridian, Capital Improvement Plan, personal interview with parks and recreation staff and BBC Research & Consulting. BBC RESEARCH gt CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 1S Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 399 of 475 Future parks and recreation capital improvements are expected to total $36 million, of which over $9 million is impact fee eligible. Mechanics of Fee Calculations Impact fees are calculated using the costs summarized in Figures 5, 7 and 9 and the demographic information from previous figures. As required by the Impact Fee Act, prior to fee adoption, the Advisory Committee must consider the following factors: The means by which existing system improvements have been financed (for example, if grant money has been consistently used to finance system improvements, it may be reasonable to postulate that this will continue in the future); The extent to which new development will contribute to financing system improvements through (past and future) taxes, assessments and contributions; The extent to which new development has provided system improvements, without charge, for other properties in the service area; Extraordinary costs incurred by the City in serving new development; and The availability of other sources of funding for system improvements (e.g., local improvement district assessments, general tax levies).31 Upon consideration of all these factors, the Advisory Committee may recommend that the City Council adjust the full cost recovery impact fee.sz Future land use assumptions. Figure 10 displays the City's incremental increase (from 2013 to 2023) in square footage distributed between residential and nonresidential land uses. The distribution is used to appropriately allocate capital improvement costs (and thereafter impact fees) to the various land uses. Figure 10. Distribution of Land Uses, 2013 to 2023 Note:Residential 15,779,452 83 % May not total due to rounding. Single Family 13,478,147 71 Multifamily 2,301,305 12 Source: Nonresidential 3,303,444 17 City of Meridian and BBC Research & Consulting. Total 19,082,896 100 ~o See Sections 67-8707 and 67-8209, Idaho Code. 3z These factors are to be considered while the City is in the process of developing a proportionate impact fee. After the adoption of an impact fee, credits maybe calculated on aproject-by-project basis in connection with an individual assessment. See Section 67-8209, Idaho Code. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 19 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 400 of 475 In 2023, the City's residential development is expected to increase by 15,779,452 square feet, and the nonresidential development is estimated to increase by 3,303,444 square feet. Therefore, the future allocation of land uses is projected to be 83 percent residential and 17 percent nonresidential. The study team has calculated all impact fees per residential unit, regardless of unit type, and per nonresidential square foot, regardless of type. BBC does not recommend imposing fees at a more detailed level of analysis (i.e., fee differentials for single family and multifamily units and differentials for commercial, agricultural and industrial square footage). In our judgment, such distinctions are unwarranted by empirical evidence. After allocating costs to the appropriate land-uses, impact fees for residential and nonresidential development are calculated by dividing the residential service costs by new residential units, and by dividing nonresidential service costs by new nonresidential square footage. Police impact fees. Figure 11 presents police impact fees of $223 per residential unit and 0.12 per nonresidential square foot. This represents the full cost recovery impact fee under Idaho's Impact Fee Act. Figure 11. Police Impact Fee Calculation Notes: 1) See Figure 45 Police Capital Improvement Plan for a list of CIP investments required to maintain the current level of service. 2) See Figure 10. Distribution of Land Uses, 2013 to 2023 Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research & Consulting. Allocated Value for Police Infrastructure 111 2,200,130 Future Land Use PercentagelZl Residential 83 3'0 Nonresidential 17 % Costs by Land Use Category Residential 1,819,265 Nonresidential 380,865 Growth to 2023 Residential (in dwelling units)8,165 Nonresidential (in square feet)3,303,444 Impact Fee by Land Use (rounded) Residential (per dwelling unit)223 Nonresidential (per square foot)0.12 BBC used the current service standard as a benchmark to double check the forward-looking CIP approach. The team is pleased that the calculated fee amounts are quite similar to Meridian's current investment in police infrastructure ($200 per residential unit and $0.10 per nonresidential square foot -see Appendix D). These similar amounts suggest that Meridian's 10- Year Police CIP is not overcharging new development for its proportionate share of new capital improvements. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 401 of 475 Fire impact fees. Figure 12 calculates the impact fees for fire capital improvements based on the future growth projections and anticipated future capital improvement costs described in earlier exhibits. Figure 12. Fire Impact Fee Calculation. Notes:Value of Future Fire Capital Improvements ~1~6,721,472 1) See Figure 7. Fire Capital a-Improvement Plan for a list of CIP Future Land Use Percentage investments required to maintain the ReSldentldl 83currentlevelofservice. 2) See Figure 10. Distribution of Land Nonresidential 17 % Uses 2013 to 2023. Allocated Value by Land Use Category source:Residential 5,557,917 City of Meridian and BBC. Nonresidential 1,163,555 Growth to 2023 Residential (in dwelling units)8,165 Nonresidential (in square feet)3,303,444 Impact Fee by Land Use Residential (per dwelling unit)681 Nonresidential (per square foot)0.35 The full cost recovery impact fees for fire capital improvements total $681 per new residential unit and $0.35 per new nonresidential square foot. These fees are within the same range as the value of Meridian's current investment in fire infrastructure ($510 per residential unit and $0.24 per nonresidential square foot). It is to be expected that the full cost recovery fees slightly exceed this current level of investment. Natural cost increases in providing the same level of service and the addition of several new types of infrastructure triggered by growth, but not wholly applicable to growth, increase the future investment in fire infrastructure. Many factors are responsible for higher fire fees as compared to the current investment in Appendix D. For example, as the city and the need for fire services have grown, additional fire engines are required to be held in reserve. Since the requirement for the additional engine is triggered by growth the costs of are impact fee eligible. Current investment does not reflect any such type of large improvement, which explains why the fees under the CIP approach are higher. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 21 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 402 of 475 Parks and recreation impact fees. Parks and recreation impact fees are shown in Figure 13, which is based on Figure 9 and demographic projections. Parks and recreation investment is only allocated to residential development since households are the primary consumers of park services. Figure 13. Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Calculation Notes: 1) See Figure 8. Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Plan for a list of CIP investments required to maintain the current level of service. Source: City of Meridian and Impact Fee Study Team. Value of future Parks & Recreation improvements Ili 9,086,206 Current Land Use Percentage Residential 100 ~° Nonresidential 0 Allocated Value by Land Use Category Residential 9,086,206 Nonresidential 0 Growth to 2023 Residential (total dwelling units)8,165 Nonresidential (in square feet)3,303,444 Impact Fee by Unit of Development Residential (per dwelling unit)1,113 Nonresidential (per square foot)N/A The full cost recovery impact fee for parks and recreation capital improvements is $1,113 for any new residential unit. The study team is pleased that the calculated fee amount does not exceed Meridian's current investment in parks and recreation infrastructure ($1,763 per residential unit). These similar amounts suggest that Meridian's 10-Year Parks and Recreation CIP is not overcharging new development for its proportionate share of new capital improvements. City Participation Because not all the capital improvements listed in the CIPs are 100 percent growth-related, the City would assume the responsibility of paying for the portion of the capital improvements that are not attributable to new growth. These payments would come from existing funds, donations and/or ongoing revenue sources that are not tied directly to growth. To arrive at the City participation amount, the expected impact fee revenue and any shared facility amount need to be subtracted from the total CIP value. Figures 14 through 19 calculate the City's participation between 2013 and 2023. The participation amount includes the cost of purely non-growth-related improvements, and portions ofgrowth-related improvements that are attributable to repair, replacement, or upgrade, and not impact fee eligible. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 403 of 475 Figure 14. City Participation -Police Capital Improvement Plan, 2013 to 2023 Note: (11 Directly from Figure 6. Police Capital Improvement Plan, 2013 to 2023. 21 City Participation amount is equal to the amount of repair/replacement/upgrade capital improvements and the non-growth amount required bythe CIP. Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research & Consulting. If the City adopts the full cost recovery police fees as calculated in this report, the City would potentially be responsible for approximately $8.8 million in police capital improvements. The City's participation would ensure that police service levels in Meridian do not decline. Again, the City's participation amount does not include ongoing operation, maintenance, repair and replacement costs that will also be borne by the City and not paid by impact fees. Figures 15, 17 and 19 on the following pages further analyze the City's participation amount by separating the City's total participation amount into two categories: the purely non-growth improvements total, and the non-growth improvements total attributed to portions of impact fee eligible improvements. It should be noted that the participation amount associated with purely non-growth improvements is discretionary. The City can choose not to fund these capital improvements although this could result in a decrease in the level of service if the deferred repairs or replacements were urgent). However, the non-growth-related portion of improvements that are impact fee eligible must be funded in order to maintain the integrity of the impact fee program. Figure 15. Analysis of City Participation, Police Capital Improvement Plan Amount attributable to purely non-growth-related improvements (discretionary) $3,000,000 Amount attributable to the non-growth-related portion of impact fee eligible improvements (required) $5,827,516 Total $8,827,516 Source: BBC Research & Consulting. To maintain the current level of service, 1.1 officers per 1,000 population, the City must contribute $5.8 million between 2013 and 2023. The City must contribute this amount since the capital improvements reflect the non-growth-related portion of impact fee eligible improvements. At the time this study was completed, the only purely non growth related item in the CIP was the amount allocated to replace vehicles. These are not impact fee eligible because they are replaced more frequently than the 10 year useful life required in order to include equipment in impact fee calculations. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 23 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 404 of 475 Figure 16 presents the City's participation in fire capital improvements, comprised of capital improvements that are repair, replacement or upgrade (discretionary funding) and capital improvements that reflect the non-growth-related portion of impact fee eligible improvements required funding). Figure 16. City Participation -Fire Capital Improvement Plan, 2013 to 2023 15,064,472 - $6,721,472 = $8,343,000 Note: )1) Net the Impact Fee Fund Balance 2) Directly from Exhihit il. Fire Capital Improvement Plan, 2013 to 2023 3) City Participation amount is equal to the amount for repair/replacement/upgrade and the non-growth amount required by the CIP. Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research & Consulting. Based on the maximum fire impact fees calculated in this report, the City's participation amount could total approximately $S million. Figure 17 below distributes the participation amount between the capital improvements that are repair, replacement, or upgrade (discretionary funding) and capital improvements that reflect the non-growth-related portion of impact fee eligible improvements (required funding). Figure 17. Analysis of City Participation, Fire Capital Improvement Plan Amount attributable to purely non-growth-related improvements (discretionary) $8,343,000 Amount attributable to the non-growth-related portion of impact fee eligible improvements {required) 0 Total $8,343,000 Source: BBC Research & Consulting. In the above analysis, the City has the discretion to contribute $8 million toward capital improvements that are purely non-growth-related. The city is not obligated to contribute any amount in order to maintain the integrity of the impact fee because none of the items on the CIP are partially growth related or partially included in the impact fee calculation. Figure 18 outlines the dollar amount that the City should contribute, in addition to impact fee receipts, to parks and recreation capital improvements between 2013 and 2023. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 405 of 475 Figure 18. City Participation -Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Plan, 2013 to 2023 32,770,863 - $9,086,206 = $23,684,658 Note: ll) Net the Impact Fee Fund Balance 12) Directly from Exhibit il. Fire Capital Improvement Plan, 2013 to 2023 i3) City Participation amount is equal to the amount for repair/replacement/upgrade and the non-growth amount required by the CIP. Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research & Consulting. Based on the full cost recovery parks and recreation fees calculated in this report, the City's participation amount could total approximately $23.7 million. Figure 19 distributes the participation amount between the capital improvements that are purely non-growth-related (discretionary funding) and improvements that reflect the non- growth-related portion of impact fee eligible improvements (required funding). Figure 19. ~ , Analysis of City Participation, Parks and Recreation Capital Amount attributable to purely non-growth-related Improvement Plan improvements (discretionary) $19,112,000 Amount attributable to the non-growth-related portion of source: I impact fee eligible improvements (required) $4,572,658 BBC Research & Consulting. Total 523,684,658 Of the $23.7 million of calculated City participation, $19 .1 million is discretionary because the associated capital improvements have been defined as purely non-growth-related. However, 4.6 of the City's participation is required in order for the impact fee analysis to remain whole. Cash Flow Analysis It is important for the City to assess revenues that would be generated by the full cost recovery impact fees as presented in this study, prior to further consideration by the Advisory Committee. Figure 20 below displays the impact fee cash flow from 2013 to 2023 using the fees calculated by the CIP methodology. Figure 20. Projected Cash Flows-CIP Methodology Projected New Residential Units 817 Projected New Nonresidential Square Feet 330,344 Cumulative Cash Flow $1,800,781 Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research & Consulting. 4,083 8,165 1,651,722 3,303,444 9,003,904 $18,007,808 BBC RESEARCH gc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 25 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 406 of 475 If impact fees were adopted at the full cost recovery amounts, the City would collect nearly $18 million in impact fee revenues from 2013 through 2023. This amount is mathematically designed to finance the entire growth-related portion of Meridian's CIP. Other Funding Sources Impact fees are just one of several funding sources for capital improvements. No one source is likely to fund all of the identified public facility needs. The City must be committed to addressing and alleviating deficiencies in service levels and addressing the expansion of service levels through exploration in connection with the following, without limitation, possible funding sources: General Fund: The City's General Fund takes in revenues and makes expenditures for the ongoing operation of City functions. General Obligation Bonds: With these bonds, the City borrows money for public facility development to be repaid with funds generated by an increase in property taxes. These voter-approved (two-thirds of all voters required) bonds establish an increase in property taxes for a period of time (typically 20 - 30 years) necessary to repay the bonds. The money raised can only be used for capital improvements and cannot be used for maintenance. Revenue Bonds: Revenue bonds may be issued based on leasehold values of land, facilities and operating entities that create a specific cash flow used to repay the bonds. Voter approval is required. Certificates of Participation: With this option, the City would sell COPS to a lending institution in return for a loan used to make improvements in connection with a public facility. The lender would securitize the loan by taking title to the facility prior to the repayment of the COPS. The loan is repaid from revenue generated by the facility or from the City's general operating budget. This option is subject to judicial approval. Grants: Grants are available from a variety of sources, including private foundations and government resources. Joint Public/Private Partnership: This approach to funding would entail the City entering into a working agreement with aquasi-public or private entity to help fund, build, and/or operate a public facility. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 26 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 407 of 475 Implementation Recommendations As the City Council evaluates whether or not to adopt the Capital Improvement Plans and impact fees, we also offer the following information for your consideration. Please note that this information will be included in the City's impact fee enabling ordinance (Appendix B). Capital Improvements Plan. Should the Advisory Committee recommend this study to the City Council and should the City Council adopt the study, the Finance Department should revise the City's existing Capital Improvement Plans using the information in this study. The existing City Capital Improvement Plans for these departments is attached to the study as Appendix H. A revised capital improvement plan would then be presented to the City for adoption as an element of the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the procedures of the Local Land Use Planning ACt.33 Impact Fee Ordinance. Following adoption of the Capital Improvement Plan, the City should review the proposed Impact Fee Ordinance (Appendix B) for adoption as reviewed and recommended by the Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee is in a unique position to work with and advise several departments and the City Council to ensure that the capital improvement plans and impact fees are routinely reviewed and modified as appropriate. Impact fee service area. Some municipalities have fee differentials for various city zones under the assumption that some areas utilize more or less current and future capital improvements. The study team, however, does not recommend the City assess different fees by dividing the City into zones. Police, fire, and parks and recreation capital improvements inherently serve asystem-wide function. If, for example, a serious accident occurs in one part of the City, the fire department may call on engines and equipment from other stations to assist. Therefore, it is more appropriate not to differentiate fees based on City zones. In practice, all areas of the City have an equal demand on the infrastructure because the parks, fire, and police department function most efficiently on asystem-wide basis. Donations. If the City receives donations for capital improvements listed on the CIP, the City must account for the donation in one of two ways. If the donation is for anon- or partially growth-related improvement, the donation can contribute to the City's General Fund participation along with more traditional forms, such as revenue transfers from the General Fund. If, however, the donation is for agrowth-related project in the CIP, the donor's impact fees should be reduced dollar for dollar. This means that the City will either credit the donor or reimburse the donor for that portion of the impact fee. Grants. If a grant is expected and regular, the grant amount should be reflected upfront in the fee calculations, meaning that the impact fees will be lower in anticipation of the contribution. If the grant is speculative or uncertain, this should not be reflected up-Front in the fee calculations since the City cannot count on those dollars as it undergoes capital planning. 33 See Sections 67-8Z03(4) and 67-SZO8(1). BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 27 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 408 of 475 The rational nexus is still maintained because the unexpected higher fund balance, due to the receipt of a grant, is deducted from the calculations as a "down payment on the CIP" when the fee study is updated. Credit/reimbursement. If adeveloper constructs or contributes all or part of agrowth- relatedproject that would otherwise be Financed with impact fees, that developer must receive a credit against the fees owed for this category or, at the developer's choice, be reimbursed from impact fees collected in the future.3'~ This prevents "double dipping' by the City. The presumption would be that builders/developers owe the entirety of the impact fee amount until they made the City aware of the construction or contribution. If credit or reimbursement is due, the City must enter into an agreement with the fee payer that specifies the amount of the creditor the amount, time and form of reimbursement.ss City participation. The Impact Fee Advisory Committee and the City of Meridian may choose not to adopt the CIPs as stated in this report, in which case the City will need to prepare revised capital improvement plans for review and adoption. Impact fee accounting. The City should continue to maintain an Impact Fee Fund (already established for the existing parks and recreation fees) separate and apart from the General Fund. All current and future impact fee revenue should be immediately deposited into this account and withdrawn only to pay for growth-related capital improvements. The City's General Fund should be reserved solely for the receipt of tax revenues, grants, user fees and associated interest earnings, and ongoing operational expenses including the repair and replacement of existing capital improvements not related to growth. Spending policy. The City should establish and adhere to a written policy governing its expenditure of monies from the Impact Fee Fund. The Fund should be prohibited from paying for City operational expenses and the repair and replacement or upgrade of existing infrastructure not necessitated by growth. In cases when growth-related capital improvements are constructed, impact fees are an allowable revenue source as long as only new growth is served. In cases when new capita] improvements are expected to partially replace existing capacity and to partially serve newgrowth, cost sharing between the General Fund and Impact Fee Fund should be allowed on a pro rata basis. Update procedures. The City is expected to grow very rapidly over the 10-year span of the CIPs. Therefore, the fees calculated in this study should be updated annually as the City invests in additional infrastructure beyond what is listed in this report, and/or as the City's projected development changes significantly. Fees can be updated on an annual basis using an inflation factor for building material from a reputable source such as McGraw Hill's Engineering News Record. sa See Section 67-8209(3), Idaho Code. 3s See Section 67-8209(4), Idaho Code. BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 28 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 409 of 475 Summary Using the CIP methodology, the state mandated approach, BBC calculated the total (i.e., police, fire, and parks and recreation) full cost recovery impact fee for residential units at $2,016 and 0.47 per nonresidential square feet as seen in Figure 21 below. This full cost recovery fee is being presented to the Advisory Committee for its review and consideration in light of statutorily identified factors. Figure 21. Summary of Impact Fees Source: B8C Research & Consulting. Police fees Residential (per dwelling unit)223 Nonresidential (per square foot)0.12 Fire Fees Residential (per dwelling unit)681 Nonresidential (per square foot)0.35 Parks & Recreation Fees Residential (per dwelling unit)1,113 Nonresidential (per square foot)N/A Tota I Fees Residential (per dwelling unit)2,016 Nonresidential (per square foot)0.47 It is the study team's assessment that the City could reasonably charge impact fees of any amount up to the $2,016 per residential unit and $0.47 per nonresidential square foot. This amount is sufficient to pay for the growth-related portions of Meridian's Capital Improvement Plans. Summary of City participation. Figure 22 summarizes the total amount the City is required to contribute and the amount the City could contribute discretionarily over the next 10 years to police, fire, and parks and recreation capital improvements. BBC RESEARCH gc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 29 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 410 of 475 Figure 22 City Participation Summary, 2013 to 2023 Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research & Consulting Discretionary Amount Purely Non-Growth Improvements) Police 3, 000,000 Fire 8, 343,000 Parks & Recreation 19,112,000 Total 30,455,000 Required Amount Partially Non-Growth Improvements) Police $5,827,516 Fire $0 Parks & Recreation $4,572,658 Total $10,400,174 The total amount the City would need to contribute over 10 years, should the City adopt fees at the full cost recovery amount, will be approximately $40.9 million. The required $10.4 million reflects the non-growth-related portion of impact fee eligible improvements. The amount attributable to capital improvements defined as purely non-growth equals nearly $30.5 million; the City can choose not to fund this total amount, however, service levels could decrease. If the City plans to fund all repair, replacement or upgrade capital improvements in addition to the required amount, the City will need approximately $40.9 million over the next 10 years. This equates to approximately $3.7 million per year that the City will have to finance by drawing from the General Fund, donations or other revenue sources. However, fairness and maintaining the integrity of the impact fee system require the City to fund nearly $1 million per year in non- growth-related capital improvements that are impact fee eligible. BBC RESEARCH gc CONSULTING FINAL REPORT. PAGE 30 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 411 of 475 Appendix A. Minimum Standards and Requirements for Development Impact Fee Ordinances Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 412 of 475 IDAHO TITLE 67 STATE GOVERNMENT AND STATE AFFAIRS CHAPTER 82 Minimum Standards and Requirements for Development Impact Fees Ordinances 67-8204. MINIMUM STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ORDINANCES. Governmental entities which comply with the requirements of this chapter may impose by ordinance development impact fees as a condition of development approval on all developments. 1) A development impact fee shall not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of system improvements determined in accordance with section 67-8207, Idaho Code. Development impact fees shall be based on actual system improvement costs or reasonable estimates of such costs. 2) A development impact fee shall be calculated on the basis of levels of service for public facilities adopted in the development impact fee ordinance of the governmental entity that are applicable to existing development as well as new growth and development. The construction, improvement, expansion or enlargement of new or existing public facilities for which a development impact fee is imposed must be attributable to the capacity demands generated by the new development. 3) A development impact fee ordinance shall specify the point in the development process at which the development impact fee shall be collected. The development impact fee maybe collected no earlier than the commencement of construction of the development, or the issuance of a building permit or a manufactured home installation permit, or as may be agreed by the developer and the governmental entity. 4) A development impact fee ordinance shall be adopted in accordance with the procedural requirements of section 67-8206, Idaho Code. 5) A development impact fee ordinance shall include a process whereby the governmental agency shall allow the developer, upon request by the developer, to provide a written individual assessment of the proportionate share of development impact fees under the guidelines established by this chapter which shall be set forth in the ordinance. The individual assessment process shall permit consideration of studies, data, and any other relevant information submitted by the developer to adjust the amount of the fee. The decision by the governmental agency on an application for an individual assessment shall include an explanation of the calculation of the impact fee, including an explanation of BBC RESEARCH Se CONSULTING APPENDIX A, PAGE 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 413 of 475 factors considered under section 67-8207, Idaho Code, and shall specify the system improvement(s) for which the impact fee is intended to be used. 6) A development impact fee ordinance shall provide a process whereby a developer shall receive, upon request, a written certification of the development impact fee schedule or individual assessment for a particular project, which shall establish the development impact fee so long as there is no material change to the particular project as identified in the individual assessment application, or the impact fee schedule. The certification shall include an explanation of the calculation of the impact fee including an explanation of factors considered under section 67-8207, Idaho Code. The certification shall also specify the system improvement(s) for which the impact fee is intended to be used. 7) A development impact fee ordinance shall include a provision for credits in accordance with the requirements of section 67-8209, Idaho Code. 8) A development impact fee ordinance shall include a provision prohibiting the expenditure of development impact fees except in accordance with the requirements of section 67-8210, Idaho Code. 9) A development impact fee ordinance may provide for the imposition of a development impact fee for system improvement costs incurred subsequent to adoption of the ordinance to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the system improvements. 10) A development impact fee ordinance may exempt all or part of a particular development project from development impact fees provided that such project is determined to create affordable housing, provided that the public policy which supports the exemption is contained in the governmental entity's comprehensive plan and provided that the exempt development's proportionate share of system improvements is funded through a revenue source other than development impact fees. 11) A development impact fee ordinance shall provide that development impact fees shall only be spent for the category of system improvements for which the fees were collected and either within or for the benefit of the service area in which the project is located. 12) A development impact fee ordinance shall provide for a refund of development impact fees in accordance with the requirements of section 67-8211, Idaho Code. 13) A development impact fee ordinance shall establish for a procedure for timely processing of applications for determination by the governmental entity regarding development impact fees applicable to a project, individual assessment of development impact fees, credits or reimbursements to be allowed or paid under section 67-8209, Idaho Code, and extraordinary impact. 14) A development impact fee ordinance shall specify when an application for an individual assessment of development impact fees shall be permitted to be made by a BBC RESEARCH Se CONSULTING APPENDIX A, PAGE 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 414 of 475 developer or fee payer. An application for an individual assessment of development impact fees shall be permitted sufficiently in advance of the time that the developer or fee payer may seek a building permit or related permits so that the issuance of a building permit or related permits will not be delayed. 15) A development impact fee ordinance shall provide for appeals regarding development impact fees in accordance with the requirements of section 67-8212, Idaho Code. 16) A development impact fee ordinance must provide a detailed description of the methodology by which costs per service unit are determined. The development impact fee per service unit may not exceed the amount determined by dividing the costs of the capital improvements described in section 67-8208(1)(f), Idaho Code, by the total number of projected service units described in section 67-8208(1)(g), Idaho Code. If the number of new service units projected over a reasonable period of time is less than the total number of new service units shown by the approved land use assumptions at full development of the service area, the maximum impact fee per service unit shall be calculated by dividing the costs of the part of the capital improvements necessitated by and attributable to the projected new service units described in section 67-8208(1)(g), Idaho Code, by the total projected new service units described in that section. 17) A development impact fee ordinance shall include a schedule of development impact fees for various land uses per unit of development. The ordinance shall provide that a developer shall have the right to elect to pay a project's proportionate share of system improvement costs by payment of development impact fees according to the fee schedule as full and complete payment of the development project's proportionate share of system improvement costs, except as provided in section 67-8214(3), Idaho Code. 18) After payment of the development impact fees or execution of an agreement for payment of development impact fees, additional development impact fees or increases in fees may not be assessed unless the number of service units increases or the scope or schedule of the development changes. In the event of an increase in the number of service units or schedule of the development changes, the additional development impact fees to be imposed are limited to the amount attributable to the additional service units or change in scope of the development. 19) No system for the calculation of development impact fees shall be adopted which subjects any development to double payment of impact fees. ZO) A development impact fee ordinance shall exempt from development impact fees the following activities: a) Rebuilding the same amount of floor space of a structure which was destroyed by fire or other catastrophe, providing the structure is rebuilt and ready for occupancy within two (2) years of its destruction; BBC RESEARCH Se CONSULTING APPENDIX A, PAGE 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 415 of 475 b) Remodeling or repairing a structure which does not increase the number of service units; c) Replacing a residential unit, including a manufactured home, with another residential unit on the same lot, provided that the number of service units does not increase; d) Placing a temporary construction trailer or office on a lot; e) Constructing an addition on a residential structure which does not increase the number of service units; and f) Adding uses that are typically accessory to residential uses, such as tennis courts or clubhouse, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that the use creates a significant impact on the capacity of system improvements. 21) A development impact fee will be assessed for installation of a modular building, manufactured home or recreational vehicle unless the fee payer can demonstrate by documentation such as utility bills and tax records, either: a) That a modular building, manufactured home or recreational vehicle was legally in place on the lot or space prior to the effective date of the development impact fee ordinance; or b) That a development impact fee has been paid previously for the installation of a modular building, manufactured home or recreational vehicle on that same lot or space. 22) A development impact fee ordinance shall include a process for dealing with a project which has extraordinary impacts. 23) A development impact fee ordinance shall provide for the calculation of a development impact fee in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A development impact fee shall not be deemed invalid because payment of the fee may result in an incidental benefit to owners or developers within the service area other than the person paying the fee. 24) A development impact fee ordinance shall include a description of acceptable levels of service for system improvements. 25) Any provision of a development impact fee ordinance that is inconsistent with the requirements of this chapter shall be null and void and that provision shall have no legal effect. A partial invalidity of a development impact fee ordinance shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance that are consistent with the requirements of this chapter. BBC RESEARCH Se CONSULTING APPENDIX A, PAGE 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 416 of 475 Appendix B. Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 417 of 475 City of Meridian Impact Fee Ordinance Attached is the Impact Fee Ordinance Revision. The ordinance in its entirety can be found at the following link: htt~//www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book id=306&chapter id=6495 BBC RESEARCH Sc CONSULTING APPENDIX B, PAGE 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 418 of 475 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, HOAGLUN, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 7, SECTION 12, MERIDIAN CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE MERIDIAN IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE FEE SCHEDULE; TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE POLICE, FIRE, AND PARKS AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted in Section 67-8201, et seq., Idaho Code, the City of Meridian ("the City") may impose Impact Fees to fund expenditures by the City Police Department, the City Fire Department and the City Parks and Recreation Department on Capital Improvements needed to serve new growth and development; and WHEREAS, the City retained BBC Research and Consulting ("Consultant") to analyze and assess new growth and development projections for the period 2013 to 2023 in order to determine the demand for police, fire, and parks and recreation Capital hmprovements to accommodate new growth and development in the City and the City's area of city impact; and WHEREAS, the City of Meridian Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvements Plan, prepared by BBC Research and Consulting, dated November 20, 2013 (the "Impact Fee Study"), sets forth a reasonable methodology and analysis for determining and quantifying the impacts of various types of new residential and nonresidential Development on the City's police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities; quantifies the reasonable impact of new growth and development on the System Improvements addressed therein; determines the costs necessary to meet demands created by new growth and development; and determines Impact Fees as set forth in this Chapter that are at a level no greater than necessary to defray the cost of planned Capital Improvements to increase the service capacity of the City's existing police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities. The City hereby establishes as the City standards the assumptions and Level of Service standards referenced in the Impact Fee Study as part of the City's current plans for future expansions to the police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities. WHEREAS, based on reasonable methodologies and analyses for determining the impacts of new growth and development on the City's police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities, the Impact Fee Study quantifies the impacts of new growth and development on Public Facilities, and establishes Impact Fees on new growth and development no greater than necessary to defray the cost of Capital Improvements that will increase the service capacity of Public Facilities to serve new growth and development. WHEREAS, in preparing the Impact Fee Study, Consultant reviewed and has relied upon the City's ten (10) year Capital Improvements Plans adopted by the City, and has reviewed and analyzed what elements of new growth and development are or would generate demand for additional police, fire. and parks and recreation Capital Improvements addressed therein; and IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page I of 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 419 of 475 WHEREAS, all of Capital Improvements planned for and included in the Impact Fee Study, which are to be funded by police, fire, and parks and recreation Impact Fees are directly related to services that the City is authorized to provide, and are services required by the general policies of the City pursuant to resolution, code or ordinance; and WHEREAS, an equitable program for planning and financing Capital Improvements to increase the service capacity of Public Facilities needed to serve new growth and development is necessary in order to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development and to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City and City's area of City impact. Such protection requires that the City's police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities be expanded to accommodate new growth and development within the City, and the City's area of city impact. WHEREAS, the "maximum allowable fee" is also referred to as the "full cost recovery fee" under the methodology set forth in the Impact Fee Study. If the adopted fee is less than the maximum allowable fee, the impact fee eligible portions of adopted Capital Improvement Plan will not be fully funded unless general fund revenue or other income sources are used to fund the difference between the maximum allowable fee and the adopted fee; and WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee met on November 20, 2013 and passed a motion to approve the Impact Fee Study and Capital Improvements Plans and recommend that the City Council hold the required public hearing on the Capital Improvements Plans and the updated Impact Fees and WHEREAS, after due and timely notice, the City Council held a public hearing to discuss. review and hear public comments on the proposed Capital Improvements Plans and the revised Impact Fee as recommended by the Development Impact Fee Committee; and WHEREAS, based upon the Impact Fee Study, the testimony at a public hearing and a review of all of the facts and circumstances, in the reasonable judgment of the City Council, the police, fire, and parks and recreation Impact Fees hereby established are at levels no greater than necessary to defray the cost of Capital Improvements directly related to the categories of residential and nonresidential land Development listed herein; and WHEREAS, in adopting the police, tire, and parks and recreation Capital Improvements Impact Fees, the City Council intends and has determined that such Impact Fees are designed to and do address Capital Improvements needs that are brought about by new growth and development, which needs are separate and distinct from the impacts and needs addressed by other requirements of the City's codes and ordinances, and in no circumstance do the Impact Fees set forth herein address the same subjects as other requirements of the City's codes and ordinances for site specific dedications or improvements; and WHEREAS, the police, fire. and parks and recreation Impact Fees, as revised, to be imposed on new growth and development will be and are hereby legislatively adopted. will be generally applicable to a broad class of property and are intended to defray the projected impacts on such Capital Improvements caused by new growth and development as required by law; and IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 2 of 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 420 of 475 WHEREAS, the Impact Fees adopted hereby shall be collected and accounted for in accordance with Section 67-8201, et seq., Idaho Code; and WHEREAS, the Impact Fees adopted by this Ordinance are fair and rational, charge new growth and development according to new growth and development's impact on the City's police, fire, and parks and recreation Public Facilities and benefit those who pay Impact Fees in a tangible way. BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and incorporated herein by this reference as findings of the City Council and that Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 12 of the Meridian City Code is repealed and replaced as follows: 10-7-12: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: A. As used in this chapter, masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to include the others wherever and whenever the context so dictates; the word shall, will or must is always mandatory; the word may is permissive; and the word should indicates that which is recommended, but not required. B. Nothing in this chapter shall limit or modify the rights of any person to complete any development for which a lawful building permit was issued prior to the effective date hereof. C. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the city from requiring a developer to construct reasonable project improvements in conjunction with a project. D. Nothing in this chapter shall limit the ability of the city to enter into intergovernmental agreements as provided in section 67-8204A, Idaho Code. E. 1. The impact fees described in this chapter, and the administrative procedures of this chapter shall be reviewed at least once every five (5) years to ensure that: a) the demand and cost assumptions and other assumptions underlying such impact fees are still valid; b) the resulting impact fees do not exceed the actual costs of providing police, fire. and/or parks and recreation system improvements required to serve new growth and development; c) the monies collected in any impact fee fund have been and are expected to be spent for system improvements of the type for which such impact fees were paid; and d) such system improvements will benefit those developments for which the impact fees were paid. 2. Except for such impact fee as may be calculated, paid and accepted pursuant to an independent impact fee calculation study, the amount of each impact fee shall be as follows effective the day of , 2014: IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 3 of 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 421 of 475 Police impact fee schedule: Residential per dwelling unit Nonresidential per square foot Fire impact fee schedule: Residential per dwelling unit Nonresidential per square foot Parks impact fee schedule: Residential per dwelling unit Nonresidential n/a Total fees: Residential per dwelling unit Nonresidential per square foot F. Violation of this chapter shall be subject to those remedies provided in this code. Knowingly furnishing false information to any official of the city charged with the administration of this chapter on any matter relating to the administration of this chapter including, without limitation, the furnishing of false information regarding the expected size or use of a proposed development, shall be a violation of this chapter. G. The captions used in this chapter are for convenience only and shall not affect the interpretation of any portion of the text of this chapter. H. If any paragraph, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is, for any reason, held to be invalid, inconsistent with the provisions of the Idaho impact fee act, section 67-8201 et seq., Idaho Code, unconstitutional and/or unenforceable, such provisions IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 4 of 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 422 of 475 shall be deemed to be separate, distinct and independent and the remaining provisions of this chapter shall continue in full force and effect. I. This chapter shall be in full force and effect not less than thirty (30) days subsequent to this chapter's passage, approval, and publication, according to law, whereupon this chapter, existing on the date hereof, and all ordinances or parts of ordinances, codes or parts of codes, in conflict with the provisions of this chapter shall be repealed. Section 2: That all other provisions of Title 10, Chapter 7 remain unchanged. Section 3: This Fee Schedule shall be in effect on the day of , 2014, which shall be no sooner than thirty (30) days after adoption and publication of this Ordinance. 2013. 2013. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of December, APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian. Idaho, this day of December, APPROVED: Tammy de Weerd, Mayor ATTEST: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Page 5 of 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 423 of 475 Appendix C. Impact Fee Ordinance Checklist Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 424 of 475 Idaho Impact Fee Act CIP Requirements See, Section 67-8208, Idaho Code Re uirement Re ort Section a) A general description of all existing public facilities Exhibits 4, 6, and 8 (existing facilities) and their existing deficiencies within the service area or areas of the governmental entity Also see Appendix D. and a reasonable estimate of all costs and a plan to develop the funding resources related to curing the existing deficiencies o including, but not limited to, the upgrading, updating, improving, expanding or re lacin of such facilities to meet existin needs and usa e; b) A commitment by the governmental entity to use other available sources of revenue to See "Other Funding Sources" cw-e existing system deficiencies where practical;page 29. c) An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments fo-- usage of Requirement addressed in fee ordinance. capacity of existing capital improvements, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional planner or by a qualified engineer licensed to perform engineering sewices in See fund balance discussion on this state;page 11. d) A description of the land use assumptions by the government entity;See land use discussion on page 6 and 7. e)Current Asset tables and A definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption,supporting text: Exhibits 4, 6, and 8. generation or discharge of a sewice unit For each category of system improvements and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to Also noted in Appendix D. various types of land uses, including residential, commercial, agricultural and industrial;See p. 5, Other fee calculation considerations. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 425 of 475 Re uirement Re ort Section f) A description of all system improvements and their costs necessitated by and attributable Exhibits 5, 7, and 9 regarding Capital Improvements to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, to Plans. provide a level of service not to exceed the level of service adopted in the development impact Fee ordinance; g) The total number of service units necessitated by and attributable to new development See Exhibits 1 and 2. within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria; h) The projected demand for system improvements required by new service units projected See CIPs 2013-2023, Exhibits 5, 7, and 9. over a reasonable period of time not to exceed twenty (ZO) years; i) Identification of all sow-ces and levels of funding available to the governmental entity for See "Other Fw~ding Sources" page 29. the financing of the system improvements; j) If the proposed system improvements include the improvement of public Facilities under Meridian currently does not collect fees for the jurisdiction of the state of Idaho or another governmental entity, then an agreement development activity beyond its city limits. This updated between governmental entities shall specify the reasonable share of funding by each unit,study does not propose fee collection beyond city limits. provided the governmental entity authorized to impose development impact Fees shall not f the city desires, it could obtain an IGA with Ada assume more than its reasonable share of funding joint improvements, nor shall the County to collect impact fees in the cow~ty (i.e., area of agreement permit expenditure of development impact fees by a govermnental entity which impact). is not authorized to impose development impact fees unless such expenditure is pursuant to a developer agreement under Section 67-8214, Idaho Code; and k] A schedule setting forth estirnated dates for commencing and completing construction of See CIPs 2013-2023, Exhibits 5, 7, and 9. all improvements identified in the capital improvements plan. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 426 of 475 Appendix D. Current Service Standard Approach Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 427 of 475 The Current Service Standard approach was used to calculate the City's current investment in capital infrastructure. This approach is only shown for comparison purposes and serves as a double check against the CIP approach in the main report. If the current investment in improvements were considerably lower than the calculated fees in the body of the main report, then the City would need to reassess the Capital Improvement Plans. If this were the case, it is likely projects were attributed to growth at an inaccurately high percentage, or, alternatively, some of the growth projects have elements of repair, replacement or upgrade that have not been identified. On the other hand, if the current investment in improvements were considerably higher than the fees calculated under the CIP approach, the City would also need to reassess the Capital Improvement Plans. In this case, it is likely the City would need more future improvements to maintain current levels of service, or the City did not allocate enough of the capital improvements to growth. The Current Service Standard methodology utilizes the current distribution of residential and nonresidential square footage in the City as a basis for allocating improvement costs. This conservative allocation is based upon the theory that current investment reflects the current level of service provided by the City, and this current level of service should be maintained in future growth. In order to evaluate the City's current capital improvements, BBC met with City staff to review the replacement costs and equity percentages (portion owned) of current capital improvements If the equity percentage for any project is less than 100 percent, this indicates that the project is debt financed and the loan has not yet been retired. For the portion of current improvements that is not yet owned in its entirety, taxes are used to pay the debt service payments. This prevents "double dipping" so that growth would not pay twice for improvements with taxes and impact fees. The types of costs eligible for inclusion in this calculation include any land purchases, construction of new facilities and expansion of existing facilities to serve growth at existing service levels. The cost of the fee study is also eligible for inclusion into the calculation for all fee categories. All current capital improvement figures include 33 percent of the fee study cost since the total cost is shared between three impact fee categories (police, fire, and parks and recreation). Unspent impact fee funds are also considered a city asset and are included in the calculation. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX D, PAGE 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 428 of 475 Figure 1 below presents the total replacement value of current police assets. The "Amount to Include in Fees" is derived from multiplying the "Replacement Value" times the "Equity Percentage" percentage. Figure 1. Current Police Assets, 2013 Police Station (1401 E. Watertower)4,000,000 100 ~4,000,000 Command Vehicle 30,000 100 30,000 Police Communications Equipment (198 Radios)990,000 100 990,000 K-9 Training Facility 400,000 100 400,000 K-9 Training Facility Land (2.5 Acres)275,000 100 275,000 Crime Scene/ Evidence Van 40,000 100 40,000 Tota I S, 735,000 5,735,000 Fee Related Research Impact Fee Study 57,38 100 %57,33 Impact Fee Fund Balance FY 2013 Beginning Fund Balance 639,687 100 ~639,687 6,382,021 6,382,021 Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research Sc Consulting. Figure 1 lists approximately $6.4 million in replacement costs for the City's police improvements with a useful life of 10 years or more. Under the Current Service Standard approach (not allowed as the fee calculation methodology in Idaho), this would all be impact fee eligible. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX D, PAGE 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 429 of 475 Figure 2 presents the current capital improvements identified by City staff for the fire department. Figure 2. Current Fire Assets, 2013 Facilities Fire Station # 1 (540 E. Franklin Rd)1,900,000 100 %1,900,000 Fire Station # 3 (3545 N. Locust Grove)1,600,000 100 1,600,000 Fire Station # 2 (2401 N. Ten Mile Rd)1,600,000 100 1,600,000 Fire Station # 4 (2515 S. Eagle Rd)1,600,000 100 1,600,000 Fire Station # 5 (N. Linder Rd)1,600,000 100 1,600,000 Training Tower @ Station #1 1,449,725 100 1,449,725 Fire Safety Center (1901 Leighfield Dr)167,000 100 167,000 Vehicles 1982 Pierce Engine (311)520,000 100 %520,000 1993 Pierce Engine (304)520,000 100 520,000 2000 Pierce Engine (302)520,000 100 520,000 2002 Pierce Engine (301)520,000 100 520,000 2004 Pierce Engine (303)520,000 100 520,000 2006 Pierce Engine (304)520,000 100 520,000 2008 Pierce Engine (305)520,000 100 520,000 2008 Pierce LADDER (T-31)1,000,000 100 1,000,000 20001nternational Water Tender (320)240,000 100 240,000 1996 Dodge Squad Vehicle (351)85,000 100 85,000 2009 FORD F550 Brushpumper 85,000 100 85,000 1980 GMC Squad Vehicle (341)85,000 100 85,000 Command Trailer 60,000 100 60,000 Equipment Opticom Traffic Signal Controls 200,000 100 %200,000 17 Vehicle Radios 68,289 100 68,289 5 Base Station Radios 26,500 100 26,500 Tota I 15,406,s14 15,406,s 14 Fee Related Research Impact Fee Study 7,333 100 %7,333 Impact Fee Fund Balance FY 2013 Beginning Fund Balance 861,861 100 %861,861 Grand Total 16,275,709 16,275,709 Note: (1) Equity percentage reflects debt service payments through August 2006. If the equity percentage is 100 percent, the City owns the capital improvement outright. Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research ix Consulting. The City has approximately $16.3 million invested in fire improvement. Under the Current Service Standard approach, nearly all of the current investment would be impact fee eligible. BBC calculated the level of service for the fire department as a ratio between the amount of fire station square footage and the size of developed area within the city. This calculation, see figure 3, indicated that only 1.8 stations would be necessary to maintain the current service level. However, because fire stations are necessary to protect public safety, BBC rounded to the nearest whole fire station indicating that 2 stations would be necessary to maintain the level of BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX D, PAGE 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 430 of 475 service. However, the CIP listed 4 stations, meaning by these calculations, 2 stations were not eligible for inclusion in the impact fees. Through discussions with the Fire Department and the Finance Department, BBC decided that it is more realistic that the City will actually need 3 new stations because fire service levels are dependent on station location and response times in addition to the number of stations. Therefore only one of the four stations was removed from the final fee calculation. See Figure 5 for calculation. Figure 3. Fire Department Level of Service Calculation Station Square Built Square Footage Built Square Foot Per Footage in Meridian Station Square Foot 2014 38,839 66,491,448 1,712 2023 69,047 85,574,343 1,239 Required to Maintain Increase in Constant Level:49,985 Service 19,363 Sq. Ft. or 2.2 Stations (~) Note: (1) Based on an average station square footage of 8,631 Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research and Consulting BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX D, PAGE 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 431 of 475 Figure 4 shows the City's current parks and recreation assets. Figure 4. Current Parks and Recreation Assets, 2013 Paths & Trails Five Mile Creek Path (2.12 Acres)233,200 100 %233,200 Kiwanis Park to Eagle Road (2 Acres)220,000 100 220,000 Blackstone Pathway (1.50 Acres)165,000 100 165,000 Sutherland Farm Pathway (1.1 Acres)121,000 100 121,000 Fothergill Pathway (1.0 Acre)110,000 100 110,000 Locust Grove Pathway (1.0 Acre)110,000 100 110,000 Bear Creek Pathway (.25 Acres)27,500 100 27,500 Neighborhood & Mini-Parks Gordon Harris/Kiwanis Park (11.1 Acres)1,964,700 100 %1,964,700 Renaissance Park (6.5 Acres)1,150,500 100 1,150,500 Season's Park (7.1 Acres)1,256,700 100 1,256,700 Chateau Park (6.7 Acres)1,185,900 100 1,185,900 8th Street Park (2.8 Acres)495,600 100 495,600 Champion Park (6.0 Acres)1,062,000 100 1,062,000 Centennial Park (0.4 Acres)7,080 100 7,080 Generations Plaza (0.24 Acres)42,480 100 42,480 Heritage MS Ball Fields (4 Acres)708,000 0 0 Bark Park (.8 Acres)141,600 100 141,600 Fire Station #4 Park (0.6)106,200 100 106,200 City Hall Plaza (0.9)159,300 100 159,300 Cox Monument (0.1 Acres)17,700 100 17,700 William Watson (7 acres Land only)t 245,000 100 245,000 Community Parks Heroes Park (30.1 Acres)5,327,700 100 %5,327,700 Tully Park (18.5 Acres)3,274,500 100 3,274,500 Bear Creek Park (18.8 Acres)3,327,600 100 3,327,600 Storey Park (19.0 Acres)2,653,000 100 2,653,000 Borup Park (47 acres Land Only)t 8,319,000 100 8,319,000 Urban Parks Meridian Settler's Park Developed (56 Acres)9,912,000 100 %9,912,000 Kleiner Park (60 Acres)10,620,000 100 10,620,000 Meridian Community Center 64,350 100 64,350 Total 53,027,610 52,319,610 Fee Related Research Impact Fee Study 7,333 100 %7,333 Impact Fee Fund Balance FY 2013 Beginning Fund Balance 3,378,970 100 %3,378,970 Grand Total 56,413,913 55,705,913 Note: f acres not included In the level of service calculation because i[ is not developed and in use. 177,000/acre in land and development costs. Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research Sc Consulting. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX D, PAGE S Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 432 of 475 The City's replacement cost for the current parks and recreation improvements totals approximately $56 million. Under the Current Service Standard approach, nearly the entire current amount of investment would be impact fee eligible. The cost per acre ($177,000) reflects an estimated average dollar amount. Therefore, because this cost is an average, it considers land priced higher than $177,000 per acre due to prime geographic locations as well as land that costs considerably less due to geographic hindrances and less desirable locations. This value includes $142,000 per acre for development costs and 35,000 per acre for land. It was calculated by taking the weighted average costs of four, existing or planned parks. It includes sample parks from community, and neighborhood park categories. See Figure 5 for calculation. Figure 5. Park Valuation Calculation Settler's 56.1 8,719,223 1,146,069 9,865,292 Gordon Harris 11.1 1,054,221 550,308 1,604,529 source:Renaissance Park 6.5 495,482 913,942 1,409,424 City of Meridian BBC Research &Borup (Planned) 30.0 4,470,000 N/A Consulting Total 103.8 14,738,926 2,610,319 12,879,245 Average Per Acre Cost (Weighted)142,022 35,380 177,402 The level of service for parks was calculated by estimating how many acres of parks would be necessary to maintain the current ratio of 3.04 acres per 1,000 population (246 acres for 81,000 people). In order to maintain this level of service, 315 acres would be necessary or 70 additional acres. However the CIP lists an additional 160 acres of developed parkland. Therefore, This is an increase in the service level by 90 acres, valued at $16,000,000 (90 X $177,000). Figure 6. Parks and Recreation level of Service Year Acres Population (1,000)Acres per PopulationCalculation2014246813.04 2023 406 104 3.91 cres equire o source:Maintain Constant City of Meridian BBC Research ~LOS:315 Increased LOS:90 acres Consulting Figure 7 displays the Ciry's current distribution of square footage between residential and nonresidential land uses, based on the demographic figures in the main report. The distribution is used to appropriately allocate improvement costs (and thereafter impact fees) to the various land uses. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX D, PAGE 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 433 of 475 Figure 7. Distribution of Land Uses, 2013 Note:Residential 56 525 614 85 1) May not total due to rounding.Single Family 53,150,096 80 source:Multifamily 3,375,518 5 Nonresidential 9 965 834 15CityofMeridian, Colliers Mternotionol Boise and Sun Nampn ,Year-End Real Estate Moricet Review, 2072 and BBC Research St Consulting.TOtaI il) 66,491,448 100 % Currently, 85 percent of total square footage in Meridian is comprised of residential development and the balance (15 percent) is nonresidential development. Impact fee calculation. Figures 8 through 10 present the impact fee calculation based on the improvement costs in Figures 1, 2, and 4. Fees are calculated by dividing the appropriate portion of service costs by total residential units and nonresidential square feet. Again, since Idaho law mandates the use of the Capital Improvement Plan approach, fees calculated under the Current Service Standard approach serve only as a conservative double-check to validate the fee levels calculated under the CIP approach. Figure 8. Calculation of Police Impact Fees Note: 1) See Figure 3. Current Police Assets. 2) See Figure 9. Distribution of Land Uses, 2013. Source: City of Meridian and Impact Fee Study Team. Current Value for Police Infrastructure (''~ Current Land Use Percentage 12i Residential Nonresidential Costs by Land Use Category Residential Nonresidential Current Land Use Residential (in dwelling units) Nonresidential (in square feet) Impact Fees by Land Use (rounded) Residential (per dwelling unit) Nonresidential (per square foot) 6,382,021 85 15 5,424,718 957,303 27,144 9,965,834 Under the Current Service Standard approach, the City has a current investment in police improvements of $200 per residential unit and $0.10 per nonresidential square foot. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX D, PAGE 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 434 of 475 Figure 9 below calculates the current investment in fire improvements under the Current Service Standard approach. Figure 9. Calculation of Fire Impact Fees Note: 1) See Figure 4. Current Fire Assets. 2) See Figure 9. Distribution of Land Uses,2013. Source: City of Meridian and Impact Fee Study Team Current Value for Fire Infrastructure Ill 16,275,709 Current Land Use PercentagelZl Residential 85 Nonresidential 15 Costs by Land Use Category Residential 13,834,352 Nonresidential 2,441,356 Current Land Use Residential (in dwelling units)27,144 Nonresidential (in square feet)9,965,834 Impact Fees by Land Use Residential (per dwelling unit)510 Nonresidential (per square foot)0.24 As of 2013, the City has $510 per residential unit and $0.24 per nonresidential square foot invested in fire improvements. Figure 10 below displays the current parks and recreation investment per residential unit. Parks and recreation investment is only allocated to residential development since households are the primary consumers of park services. Figure 10. Calculation of Parks and Recreation Impact Fees Note: 1) See Figure 6. Current Parks and Recreation Assets. Source: City of Meridian and BBC Research ~ Consulting Current Value for Parks & Recreation Ili 55,705,913 Current Land Use Percentage Residential 100% Nonresidential Oho Allocated Value by Land Use Category Residential 55,705,913 Nonresidential 0 Current Land Use Residential (total dwelling units)27,144 Nonresidential (in square feet)N/A Impact Fee by Land Use (rounded) Residential {per dwelling unit)2,052 Nonresidential (per square foot)N/A The City's current investment in parks and recreation improvement is $2,052 per residential unit. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX D, PAGE 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 435 of 475 Appendix E. Detailed Demographic Analysis Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 436 of 475 The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act defines "Land Use Assumptions" as a description of the service area and projections of land uses, densities, intensities, and population in the service area over at least a 20-year period. The 2013 and 2023 current and forecasted residential land uses for the City of Meridian are based on COMPASS' demographic area as calculated in the COMPASS document; Communities (n Motion 2040 Vision Forecasts by Demographic Areas, updated in October 2012. The basis for the City's nonresidential square footage was Colliers' International Boise and Nampa, Year-End Rea(Estate Market Review, 2012. This report is located in Appendix G. This appendix details the calculations and assumptions used to arrive at current and future residential units and current and future nonresidential square footage. This appendix should be read in conjunction with the main report text, which summarizes the study team's approach to the demographic data analysis. Residential Data COMPASS produces two types of demographic estimates/forecasts: Trend Forecasts and the Community Choices Forecast. COMPASS explains that "the goal of [the Trend] forecast was to allocate future growth based on prevailing residential patterns and densities...Since Trend is based on current development (everything built to date) and on-going development (approved and preliminary development proposals), Trend will be adjusted each year to reflect changing pattern." ~ The second forecast, the Community Choices Forecast, "does not reflect the way the region has been growing, instead it incorporates a vision for how we would like to grow."' In other words, this forecast allows for changes in the Trend forecast reflecting the way in which the community desires to grow. This forecast takes into account denser growth within existing areas of impact, higher density development around transit corridors, and open space between communities. The study team has chosen to use the Community Choices Forecast data because we believe it provides a more accurate vision of the future and it has been adopted by COMPASS as the preferred growth forecast used in the regional long-range transportation plan. The COMPASS document is entitled Communities in Motion 2040 Vision Forecasts by Demographic Areas, last updated in October 2012. t Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS), Frequently Asked Questions about COMPASS Forecasts. 2 Ibid. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 437 of 475 The document cited on the previous page provides detailed data on population, households and jobs by three Meridian-specific sub areas (North Meridian, Central Meridian and South Meridian). Current and future households. As stated in the main report text, to estimate the current and future number of households in the City, the study team used household estimates from the aforementioned COMPASS document. Based on previous input from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee, the study team has chosen to use COMPASS' data (demographic area) as a reasonable proxy for the area of impact. The maps on the following pages portray the current City limits and COMPASS' demographic areas. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 2 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 438 of 475 J Cite of ~icridian 'o..n Future Land Use Map . v.c. Legend es<sc~ -- -~ sxs Tr3nnn Sratnrt j FULr6 F2C]iri66 T.n~ M~ liilerclwbe. SNer~fn: Fr~heN WuM.ap F W WC IniCMYUn9c - -f Fryve O~erpazs EritryNa7 CO(!ld'X EN36^G lV~tn-war 1 F IDI~ IAN,.- J C Nora3.~~.......... ~~....re..nr.u... r, Fulurc Land Uscs Cit}~ idc Tcn Milc lntcrchangc Spccitic Arca F~t.~lc Rp-ACeo~i I_ ~.<pox ynsrt: 2?s4n.e Nn. Viers:-). ert.E'r~mun: cn _ar.Sry ROSba~¢!J~C-vrn M~._m V 6EM~'..a _ Y6M1 51cEi_~DCS.91y RL SOOnLY Rli.~Ux 'JCq'%~M~OE Mot NV~"Oa~`i R~.ECn:~~ Mace Emp~l~m¢:l Sin. HeJi nnwtr Rr_,. sa.+.a AWG Ux Ganmuvh lfrp+PenxtY lZNWrfttd M~eO Ux Rq~slrel N=_^'~e~-sry Resitlerrial - M.an: iiv rv~e.Rr_a>naM Rp-a ~ Eav»rr~t Muetl Use CmnYacial rrrrpr~: ~ I Mrd lKe Re~w~Crvr i Lint1Y~ C. xr u t.Fxaa use . tmxu+arge xac+ S~ePM yarn ncusne tAV Oercfy Empvyirscnt Adopted March 5. 2013 BBC RESEARCH & CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 439 of 475 Ada (~rn~nty BBC RESEARCH & CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 440 of 475 The data below reflect the COMPASS-defined demographic areas in the report Communities in Motion 2040 Vision Forecasts by Demographic Areas. These data were the basis for current and future residential estimates/forecasts. Z 1 E imat s 2 1 mmuni h i 2 2 mmunit h i 2 2 mmu ni h i Demo ra hic Area Po ulation Household lobs`Po ulation Households lobs'Po ulation Household lobs"Po ulation Households Jobs" Air art 890 35]10,080 907 358 11,537 889 363 13,181 910 371 15,359 Boise Foothills 9,362 3.331 3,465 10,024 4,035 3,496 10,416 4,258 3,530 10,787 4,410 3,575 Boise Northwest 14,259 6,198 3,487 14,661 6,366 3,767 15,010 6,590 4,079 16,499 7232 4500 Central Bench 38,374 17,017 21,120 39,692 7,150 22,592 39,147 17,336 24,250 42,061 18,718 26,442 Downrown 3,406 2,21 30,278 3,942 2,271 33,18]3,922 2,273 36,473 4,349 2,542 40,810 East End 6,785 3,196 3,215 7,075 3,233 3,315 7,009 3,287 3,428 7,147 3,347 3,577 North End 17,576 8,273 3,357 17,702 8,332 3,60 17,429 8,395 3,889 18,192 8,758 4,260 Southeast-ea rber Valle 1,662 637 489 2,491 992 522 3,417 1,390 560 3,906 1,592 610 Southeast 8nise 33.315 14,708 19,590 35037 15,008 21,181 35,200 15,367 22,980 36,817 1.6.112 253:9 1~ ~aue 40,683 1953 13993 43098 14,819 14.648 45 ]Ot 15,g6]15383 43311 7.L2n L6359 69072 elr gn394 7935 37,066 11..348 I0.41~580 J-1,SJ3 a 97T 4198 a -~1~~`~ Boise total 235,38 96,905 149,468 245.565 99.630 160.195 247,957 102,800 172,296 264,019 109,709 188,316 Ea le Total 21299 7,582 5136 23,918 8,510 6,272 27,428 9,852 7,546 30,740 11000 9,232 Garden Cit Total 1 OS 4923 7033 1 315 5036 772 11445 5242 8 1263 5793 9509 Kuna Total 17,850 5,657 2135 20311 6,419 3,282 22,397 7,515 4,595 29192 9,489 6,329 Star Total 6222 209 496 7 46 253 750 9,58 32 1036 1213 4147 411 Censer R~leridiar+409]4 14,920 16,924 4,260 1.517 19433 44.183 1459 2,007 47,937 77,953 25,439 North Mehdian 3G 319 7940 2,352 37,795 7,856 3,137 40,673 12,590 3732 44,149 13673 4,527 South Mer idian 14,957 4,915 4,097 18,888 6,148 4,727 23,845 7,892 5,419 26,514 8,786 6,353 MeridianT --~3631 Blocks Creek RU rat 15 180 3,059 5 1,007 3,058 5 1,009 3,058 5 1,011 Call foothills Rural 393 141 58 431 155 176 488 181 178 920 349 261 Northwest Rural Ada 3,978 1,299 302 5,985 2,016 400 9,438 3,252 507 10,912 3,804 651 Southeast Rural 1,190 375 131 1,242 392 161 1,311 421 195 2,29 744 239 West Foothills 177 72 47 249 99 73 367 146 702 421 167 141 Southeast Rural 946 296 252 1,035 324 254 1,101 360 256 1,166 380 258 fen Mile Creek Rural 1,410 497 1,67-0 3,563 508 807 3,533 520 870 3,572 535 837 West Faothil is 320 445 116 1,403 472 277 1466 513 456 4,563 1,598 694 Ada Rural Total 9 429 313 2 70 16,967 3,97 3 5 20 762 5398 3,523 26,90 7,582 4,092 A un T I 4 1 1 2 27 41 11 1 7 7 2 11 271 171 22 42 4 4221 1 1 2 2 2 Central Caldwell 9,934 3,670 2,384 10662 3,744 2,482 10,819 3,867 2,589 11,597 4,155 2,732 Downlo wrr Caldwell 3,800 1,366 4,126 4,752 1,433 4,401 4,586 1,460 4.711 5,121 1,670 5,173 Northeast Caldwell 16,082 5,131 2,917 19,622 6,332 4,856 25,201 8,459 7,040 28,683 9,648 9,934 South Caldwell 14,249 4,407 1,694 17,021 5,384 1,962 21,777 7,161 2.753 26,314 8,712 2,649 West Caldwell 6,417 2352 2,069 6,875 2,485 2,181 7,426 2,724 2304 7,916 2,901 2,472 Caldwell Total 50482 16 92 13 19 58,932 19 378 15 2 69 809 23,67 8 902 79 63 27086 22 910 Downtown Nam a 5,027 2,039 3,094 5,063 2,053 3731 4,865 2,063 4,449 5,7)0 2,444 5,403 East Narn a 16,077 5,415 5,687 16,493 5.554 6,676 16,481 5,758 7.409 18,878 6,623 8379 North Nam a 9,562 3,162 7,013 12,062 3,813 8584 14,854 4,808 10,858 17,843 5,826 13,095 Southeast Nam a 22,958 7,971 4,363 24,24?3,183 4.601 24,872 8,560 4,867 26.109 8,981 5,718 West Nam a 36,736 12,763 8,77 9./17 3,627 9,262 43,072 14995 9,808 44,981 15657 10535 Nam a Total 90 3 3135 28 931 97 580 33 23 32 5 1041 36 37 39 113 537 39 3 a2 63 Middleton Total 7,22 242 865 7 836 2 62 9 B 5 2967 10 9,16 3 362 148 West RUral-Green leaf Total 1,119 395 79 1,137 401 88 1,134 407 99 1,511 538 115 South RUral-Melba Total 823 270 205 8 277 243 859 288 285 1,08 365 341 Northwest Rural-NOtus Total 7 265 131 808 273 1 816 285 2W O6 355 262 Northwest RU rat-Pa rma TO[al 2,295 81 638 2,382 84 686 2,500 897 741 3,126 125 810 west RUral-Wilder Total 715 525 235 806 55 285 1910 61 3 265 86 413 gar theist Rural total G.85G 2,386 806 7280 535 833 7905 t 797 861 8,442 2_,991 907 r th~,+~es: Rural total 5.060 1.638 666 226 1,695 715 5,376 1,793 1!1 5,570 1,860 844 South aural Total 2,104 4,006 1,800 13407 4,447 1,856 15,264 5,177 1915 16,799 5,703 1,995 West Rural foal 7,386 2,579 2,636 7,854 2,732 2,687 8,442 2,990 2,746 8,881 3,144 2,823 I TOtaI 3 70 S~337 1 6 6 63 n n un T I 1 211 1 1 2 7 1 72 1 22 7 7 2 2 2 21 7 1 2 R i n IT I 7 2 211 24 24 22 2 42 74 7 24 1 74 2 2 COMPASS document: Communities in Motion 1090 Vision Forecasts by Demographic Areas . According to COMPASS' Community Choices report, the population in Meridian in 2010 was 82,250, households totaled 27,775 and there were 23,373 jobs in the demographic area. The data presented above are all 2010 numbers. Data are only provided for 5-year increments beginning in 2010. Therefore, the study team calculated the annual percent change between 2010 and 2015 to estimate residential data in 2013. The study team used the same approach to calculate data for 2023 (necessary for the Capital Improvement Plan approach).] s Annual percent change = ((In(new population)-ln(old population))/number of years. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE S Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 441 of 475 The final table portrays how the study team arrived at 2013 and 2023 residential data. Residential Calculation for 2013 to 2023 Population 74,529 80,806 2.7% 85,438 98,498 103,739 1.7% 107,467 Households 25,168 27,144 2.6% 28,593 33,473 35,310 1.84 36,619 Jobs 21,179 23,213 3.1% 24,735 28,233 30,908 3.1% 32,905 Source: COMPASS Community Choices Forecast data and BBC Research Sc Consulting Twenty-year projection data. The table on the following page lists COMPASS' forecasts to 2030 for all the demographic areas in Ada and Canyon Counties. Twenty-year forecasts are necessary to include in this report to meet the requirements of the State Statutes. However, these data are not used in the calculation of impact fees, since the timeline of the CIP is only 10 years. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 442 of 475 2010 Estimates 2015 CommunitvC hoices 2020 CommunitvC hoices 2025 CommunitvCh oices 2030CommunituCh oices 2035CommunitvCho ices Demo ra hicArea Population Households lobs"Population Households lobs"Population Households lobs"Population Households lobs"Population Households lobs'Population Households lobs' Alr ort 890 351 10,080 907 358 11,537 889 363 13,181 910 371 15,359 936 381 17781 965 393 20400 Boise Foothills 9,362 3,881 3,465 10,024 4,035 3,496 10,416 4,258 3,530 10,787 4,410 3,575 11,093 4,533 3628 11451 4676 3683 Boise Northwest 14,259 6,198 3,487 14,661 6,366 3,767 15,010 6,590 4,079 16,499 7,232 4,500 18,422 8,065 4964 20915 9147 5466 CentralRench 38,374 17,017 21,120 39,692 17,150 22,592 39,147 17,336 24,250 42,061 18,718 26,442 46,308 20,742 28885 51947 23437 31516 Downtown 3,406 2,214 30,278 3,942 2,271 33,181 3,922 2,273 36,473 4,349 2,542 40,810 5,013 2,957 45650 5900 3515 50879 East End 6,185 3,196 3,215 7,075 3,233 3,315 7,009 3,287 3,428 7,147 3,347 3,577 7,253 3,398 3744 7376 3457 3923 North End 17,576 8,273 3,357 17,702 8,332 3,608 11,429 8,395 3,889 18,192 8,758 4,260 19,291 9,281 4661 20744 9976 5132 Southeast-Barber Valle 1,662 637 489 2,491 992 522 3,417 1,390 560 3,906 1,592 610 4,297 1,758 666 4803 1971 727 Southeast Boise 33,315 14,708 19,590 35,037 15,008 21,181 35,200 15,367 22,980 36,817 16,112 25,359 38,950 17,118 28003 41788 18456 30859 Southwest Boise 40,683 13,953 13,993 43,098 14,819 14,648 45,105 15,961 15,383 48,374 17,129 16,359 52,229 18,491 17453 57168 20236 18610 WestDench 69,072 26,477 40,394 70,936 27,066 42,348 ID,413 21,580 44,543 74,977 29,498 47,465 81,221 32,135 50725 89473 35627 54225 Boise Total 235,384 96,905 149,468 245,565 99,630 160,195 247,957 102,800 172,296 264,019 109,709 188,316 285,013 118,859 206,180 312,530 130,891 225,420 Eagle Total 21,299 7,582 5,136 23,918 8,510 6,212 27,428 9,852 7,546 30,740 11,000 9,232 34,136 12,195 11,103 38,269 13,658 13,126 Garden City Total 11,051 4,923 1,033 11,315 5,036 7,720 11,445 5,242 8,488 12,630 5,193 9,509 14,140 6,504 10,643 16,137 7,443 11,865 Kuna Total 1],850 5,657 2,115 20,311 6,419 3,282 22,397 7,515 4,595 29,192 9,489 6,329 35,961 12,147 8,264 46,079 15,618 10,361 StarTOtal 6,222 2,090 496 7,54fi 2,536 750 9,561 3,260 1,036 12,134 4,147 1,411 15,103 5,197 1,836 18,931 6,560 2,289 Center Meridian 0.0,974 14,920 16,924 4,260 1,551 19,A33 44,183 16,459 22,007 47,937 17,953 25,439 53,136 20,030 29,245 60,030 22,784 33,355 North Meridian 36,319 7,940 2,352 32,795 9,856 3,137 40,673 12,590 3,732 44,]49 13,673 4,522 47,071 14,581 5,402 50,707 15,705 6,345 SouthMeridlan 14,957 4,915 4,097 18,888 6,148 4,727 23,845 7,892 5,419 26,514 8,786 6,353 29,262 9,713 7385 32,833 10,917 8,501 Meridian Total ~77~I 3.31,.555 37,297 308,701 36,314 129,469 I .143,570 Blacks Creek Rural 15 S 180 3,059 5 1,007 3,058 5 1,009 3,058 S 1,011 3,058 5 1,014 3,060 6 1,017 East foothills Rural 393 141 58 431 155 116 488 181 178 920 349 261 1560 598 355 2415 931 455 Northwest Rural Ada 3,978 1,299 302 5,985 2,016 400 9,438 3,252 507 10,912 3,804 651 12400 4380 811 14290 5113 986 Southeast Rural 1,190 375 131 1,242 392 161 1,311 421 195 2,294 744 239 3766 1227 286 5745 1876 336 WestFOOthills 177 72 47 249 99 73 367 146 102 421 167 141 424 169 185 434 173 231 Southeast Rural 946 296 252 1,035 324 254 1101 360 256 1,166 380 258 1169 381 261 1171 382 264 Ten Mlle Creek Rural 1,410 497 1,620 3,563 508 807 3,533 520 820 3,572 535 837 3614 550 856 3672 571 875 West Foothills 1,320 445 116 1,403 472 277 1,466 513 456 4,563 1,598 694 9308 3263 960 15681 5498 1245 Ada Rural Total 9,429 3,130 2,706 16,967 3,971 3,095 20,762 5,398 3,523 26,906 1,582 4,092 35,299 10,513 4,726 46,468 14,550 5,409 Ada Count Total 383 491 148 062 190 327 419 911 157 657 208 611 448 271 171008 228 642 494 221 188132 255 203 549 121 209 799 284 788 621990 238126 316 671 Central Caldwell 9,934 3,670 2,384 10,662 3,744 2,482 10,819 3,867 2,589 11597 4,155 2,732 12,653 4,547 2891 14,037 5,062 3,060 Downtown Caldwell 3,800 1,366 4,126 4,752 1,433 4,401 4,586 1,460 4,711 5,121 1,670 5,123 5,907 1,979 5,579 6,950 2,392 6,070 Northeast Caldwell 16,082 5,131 2,917 19,622 6,332 4,856 25,201 8,459 7,040 28,683 9,648 9,934 32,367 10,915 13,152 36,997 12,506 16,635 South Caldwell 14,249 4,407 1,694 17,021 5,384 1,962 21,777 7,161 2,258 26,314 8,712 2,649 31,703 10,572 3,060 38,573 12,953 3,543 West Caldwell 6,417 2,352 2,069 6,875 2,485 2,181 7,426 2,724 2,304 7,916 2,901 2,472 8,396 3,078 2,654 9,006 3,303 2,853 CaldwellTatal 50,482 16,926 13,190 58,932 19,378 15,882 69,809 23,671 18,902 79,631 27,086 22,910 91,026 31,091 27,356 105,563 36,216 32,161 Downtown Nam a 5,027 2,039 3,094 5,063 2,053 3,731 4,865 2,063 4,449 5,720 2,444 5,403 7,049 3,037 6,459 8,530 3,832 7,603 East Nam a 16,077 5,415 5,687 16,493 5,554 6,676 16,481 5,758 7,409 18,878 6,623 8,379 22,156 7,813 9,460 26,449 9,375 10,623 North Nampa 9,562 3,162 7,013 12,062 3,813 8,584 14,854 4,808 10,858 17,843 5,826 13,095 21,871 7,204 15,563 27,253 9,046 18,261 Southeast Nampa 22,958 7,971 4,363 24,243 8,183 4,601 24,872 8,560 4,867 26,109 8,981 5,218 27,674 9,521 5,610 29,681 10,215 6,035 WestNam a 36,736 12,763 8,774 J9, 719 17,627 9,262 43,072 14,995 9,808 44,987 15,657 10,535 46,453 16,188 11,345 48,171 16,820 12,216 Nampa Total 90,360 31,350 28,931 97,580 33,230 32,854 104,144 36,184 37,391 113,537 39,531 42,630 125,203 43,763 48,457 140,384 49,288 54,758 Middleton Total 7,227 2,427 865 7,836 2,628 934 8,544 2,947 1,029 9,767 3,362 1,148 10,915 3,751 1,284 12,277 4,212 1,430 West Rural-Greenleaf Total 1,119 395 79 1,137 401 88 1,134 407 99 1,511 538 115 2,086 737 133 2,860 1,005 151 South Rural-Melba Total 823 270 205 844 277 243 859 288 285 1,086 365 341 1,419 477 402 1,863 627 464 Northwest Rural-NotusTotal 184 265 131 808 213 168 816 285 Z09 1,061 355 262 1,421 456 322 1,893 588 386 Northwest Rural -Parma Total 2,295 814 638 2,382 844 686 2,500 897 741 3,126 1,125 810 3,984 1,440 890 5,113 1,854 974 West Rural - Wilder Total 1115 525 235 1,806 556 285 1,910 614 340 2,654 861 413 3 680 1,200 495 5 028 1645 581 Northeast Rural total 6,856 2,386 806 7,280 2,535 833 7,905 2,797 861 8,442 2,991 901 8,681 3,082 945 8,939 3,180 992 Northwest Rural Total 5,060 1,638 666 5,226 1,695 715 5,376 1,793 771 5,570 1,860 844 5,630 1,882 925 5,699 1,905 1,013 South Rural Total 12,104 4,006 1,800 13,402 4,442 1,856 15,264 5,177 1,915 16,799 5,703 1,995 18,173 6,175 2,085 19,591 6,765 2,182 West Rural Total 7,386 2,579 2,636 7,854 2,732 2,687 8,442 2,990 2,746 8,881 3,144 2,823 8,975 3,179 2,909 9,079 3,218 3,000 l ThalRr r 09!h~318 7ual-i n n n T l 1 211 1 1 2 2 7 1 72 1 22 7 2 2 2 21 7 2 1 7 1 11 2 R i n l T I 2 4 2 22 4 2 4 7 74 24 2 74 2 27 14 7 2 7 7 4 2 414 7 COMPASS document: Communities in Motion 2040 Vision Forecasts 6y Oemographir Areas . In 2035, Meridian will have 143,570 persons, 49,460 households and 48,201 jabs. BBC RESEARCH & CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 443 of 475 The table below presents the annual percent change between 2030 and 2035, which is used to estimate residential data in 2033. Residential Calculation for 2033 Population 129,469 137,667 2.1~° 143,570 Source: Hou52hOId5 44,324 47,274 2.2% 49,406 COMPASS Community Choices Forecast Jobs 42,032 45,581 2.7% 48,201dataandmpactFeeStudyTeam. The demographic data in 2033 are as follows: 137,667 persons, 47,274 households and 45,581 jobs. Nonresidential Data Colliers' Idaho Boise and Nampa, Year-End Real Estate Market Review, 2012, was the basis for calculating current and future nonresidential square footage. The study team totaled the retail, office and industrial square footage to arrive at a base number of nonresidential square feet in Meridian. This base number was used to calculate the total current and projected square footage in the City. Current nonresidential development. As discussed in the main report text, Colliers report only tabulated buildings greater than 5,000 square feet. In order to adjust the square footage upwards to include smaller buildings, the study team calculated the percentage of new commercial units since 2009 that were less than 5,000 square feet in size. As of August 2013, on average, 4 percent of the City's newly permitted commercial units were less than 5,000 square feet. The following exhibit shows the City data that were used to quantify the proportion of units less than 5,000 square feet. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 444 of 475 BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 445 of 475 In the spreadsheet on the previous page, the method to calculate the percentage of units less than 5,000 square feet is as follows: 1) Calculate the average square footage of built units to determine if, in that particular month, the units built were, on average, 5,000 square feet or less. New SQF column/New Commercial column = Average SQF per Unit column 2) Use an Excel formula to quickly identify the months that "qualified" as having units with an average square footage of 5,000 or less. 1= "yes" (the average of all units was 5,000 square feet or less); 0 = "no" (the average of all units was not less than 5,000 square feet). 3) Tabulate the total square footage of the "qualifying" months with unit averages of 5,000 square feet or less. Total square footage of "qualifying" months = 163,196 sq. ft. 4) Determine the proportion of total square footage that can be attributed to buildings that are 5,000 square feet or less. 163,196 total square feet of "qualifying" months / 3,286,947 total square feet of all commercial buildings = 5 percent. Knowing that 5 percent of the City's new commercial square footage was less than 5,000 square feet, the study team deduced that Colliers tabulation thus represents 95 percent (100 percent -5 percent) of the actual nonresidential square feet in Meridian. The study team arrived at the final 2013) nonresidential square footage in Meridian by dividing Colliers number (9,471,529 square feet) by 95 percent. This method generates a total of 9,965,834 nonresidential square feet in 2013. Future nonresidential development. Based on the current nonresidential data, the study team developed a ratio of nonresidential square feet per employee. This ratio is used to project nonresidential square footage in 2023. Currently, there are 23,213 jobs in Meridian. According to the methodology described above, current nonresidential square feet total 9,965,834. Dividing the square footage by the number of jobs produces a ratio of 429 square feet per employee in 2013 (9,965,834/23,213). h This ratio of square footage per employee may change over time. The 4Z9 square feet per employee is the study team's best estimate given the available data. BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 446 of 475 COMPASS' report also projects jobs in 2023. Therefore, assuming the ratio of square feet to workers remains consistent; the study team used this ratio to project nonresidential square footage forward. The estimated number of jobs in 2023 (30,905) is multiplied by the square footage per employee calculated on the previous page (429). This produces a total of 13,269,278 nonresidential square feet in 2023. See the spreadsheet below for details on the calculation of current and future nonresidential square footage. Current Square Footage Calculation Total SFT Total SFT per Colliers Report including units over all buildings greater 5,000 SFT than 5,000 SFT) (see below for calculation) 9,471,529 9,965,834 Calculation of Total Current SFT 9,471,529 (Colliers) + x (SFT total of units less than 5,000) = y (total SFT) x = .0496 y (4.96 percent oftotal square footage is less than 5,000 -see City data spreadsheet) Substitute y for x 9,471,529 + ..0496 y = y 9,471,529 = y-.0496y 9,471,529 = .95y 9,471,529 /.95 = y Y= 9,965,834 Source: COMPASS Community Choices Forecast data, Colliers Year End Real Estate Market Review, 2012 and City of Meridian. 2013 Total Employment 2012 SFT 23,213 9,965,834 2023 SFT 2023 2023EmploymentX Employment SFT per Employee) 30,908 13,269,278 SFT per Employee 2013 Employment/ 2012 SFT) 429 Source: COMPASS Community Choices Forecast data, Colliers Year End Real Estate Market Review, 2012, City of Meridian and BBC BBC RESEARCH St CONSULTING APPENDIX E, PAGE 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 447 of 475 Appendix F. Colliers' Year-End Real Estate Market Review Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 448 of 475 i. 1 1 a d P~~~~ l LANO i t~l Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 449 of 475 55 Nampa ~-------• Idaho Center ,!y Downtown Nampa Q Karcher Northsidc ©South Nampa Contents Canyon County Submarkets J MARKET REVIEW Retail • MARKET REVIEW Industrial MARKET REV: ~';V Investment 8 1,1ARKE7 REVIEYJ l~Y MARKET REViEVl Land P,taRKE7 REViCYJ COMPREHENSIVE STATISTICS Retail COMPREHENSIVE STATISTICS Industrial COMPREHENSIVE STATISTICS 3015E 755 WEST FRONT STREET, SUITE 300 C301SE, ID 83702 NAMPA 5660 EAST FRANKLIN ROAD, SUITE 110 NAMPA, 10 83687 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 450 of 475 I : ~~~~2 I ; ~_-~,~-~r~ f I ~----. it--~~~` 1 ~ a ~ I ~ I~ ~~ ~~ J 1 ~ k~, I I~ Q ~ ~. I II ~\ ~ II ~~ _ ` J ` '~ I I~ I t I J ~~ ~~ ~> I II L-------------II 1 Y uownlown rsolse J Hirporl © Garden City Q Eagle ~ North End ©Central Bench 0 West Bench '~J Meridia Southeast ~ Northwest J Southwest Ada County Submarkets COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL IDAHO MANAGING OWNER GEORGE ILIFF george.iliff(dcolliers.cam 208.472.2858 For Questions or Additions! lnjormafion, Please Concoct: RESEARCH ANALYST LEVIJOHNSON levi.johnson2colliers.cam 208.472.2860 DIRECTOR OF MARKETING DAVE FERNANDEZ dave.fernandezCdcolliers.com 208.472.2868 Afl in/ormotion provided in this report is /ram sources we deemed reliable. Colliers Infernotianol makes no represenfntian or wnrronty as to ifs accuracy. 2013 Colliers Paragon LLC -All Rights ReservedMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 451 of 475 Overview The Treasure Valley office market improved during 2012, end- ing the year with a 15.4% overall vacancy rate, down from 17.2% twelve months ago. Leasing activity was slightly stronger in the second half of 2012 compared to the first half of the year. The Treasure Valley office market experienced 558,091 square feet of absorption in the second half of 2012, surpassing the 315,686 square feet absorbed during the first half of the year. The down- town periphery had the greatest absorption of any submarket in 2012, with 100,043 square feet of newly leased office space. All other submarkets in the trade area experienced positive absorp- tion with the exception of the southwest submarket. 2012 was a positive year for existing projects such as the 269,000 square foot 8th & Main building in Downtown Boise. Slated for completion in 2014, it is over 76% leased at the time of this publication. Speculative building is still not an op- tion for most developers. Banks remain cautious, requiring significant preleasing for office projects to break ground. Notable transactions from January -June, 2012 include: Sorenson Communications - 25,643 square foot lease at Silverstone Corporate Center in Meridian. CTA Architects - 21,000 square foot lease at 8th & Main in Downtown Boise. Pinebridge 1 Building in Meridian - 26,037 square foot sale in the first half of 2012. Notable transactions from July -December 2012 include: 2 01 Lm of Available Office SF 6y Building Class &submarket Boise State University - 8,852 square foot purchase in Bobo. Berkley North Pacific - 18,000 square foot lease in the Water Tower Building in Meridian. EPA - 9,800 square foot lease in the Banner Bank Building in Downtown Boise. 35oaoo BUILDING CLASS -35°~ 3aoooo J a - 30% c ~ _, 450000 t Vacancy -25%23.0% 9~ 21.4% 16.4% 21.4% p 200000 19.ii16 -2U% N LL ^y d 7 m ~ 15.2% K lc 150000 -15% 100000 9.6% ~ ~ -'ta°/a 48% 50000 ~ - ~ _ 5% 0 ^ ~ ~ 0°~ Central Downtown Downtown Eagle Meridian Southeast Southwest West Bench Bench Periphery BOISE 755 WEST FRONT STREET, SUITE 300 BOISE, 10 83702 NAMPA 5660 EAST FRANKLIN ROAD, SUITE 110 NAMPA, ID 83687Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 452 of 475 o~ 2 Inventory & Vacancy Colliers International tracks approximately 18.2 million square feet of space in 893 office buildings 5,000 square feet or larger in fif- teen different submarkets throughout Ada and Canyon Counties. Vacancy continues to decrease slowly throughout the Treasure Valley. The Eagle & North End /Northwest /Garden City submar- kets posted the largest declines in vacancy from mid-year 2012, 10.2% and 5.1% respectively. Canyon County, Meridian and the Cen- tral Bench were the only submarkets in which vacancy increased, posting vacancy rate increases of 3.5%, .4% and 4.1% respectively. Asking Rates Overall asking rates declined slightly in 2012 to an average of 15.22 full service, down from $15.79 at the beginning of 2012. 20~--,Year=End Office Average Full Service Direct Asking Rates I L !5,000 sr•1 530.00 525.00 N 520.00 sn.45 st9.92 st6.% frr.% 515.00 ~ su.a ~~ star 510.00 ~~`~ 55.00 50.00 0ac` c`a'c Qa`~ a~ Da ~~i `eay~ r~ay~ 0ac` Jc~~ c`~a Oo3 ° ~` kr fie` ~a`a¢c ~Or tio,` fey` c~o`oVc~o~ boy va a a\~.o''' c 2 0 1 YY~-End Office Inventory by Submarket c5,ooo 25% n~ tsw15"~~ 1496 G ~ ~ !196 1196 109< a~ 10°~0 . c d c 0% c v ac ~~ ~ ~i y y~ ~a .~o vc •~a• ry eC JC ea ~ a40 V• 3c~ ~ e~ ~~Q ~ ~o ~'~ Jr ~ ac Oo ey ~' Qe `~a ec yo y° a~D c ac ~~ ~C~ o V `a 3~y. O° a~2' c z The most significant change in asking rates came from the Southwest, Southeast and Central Bench submarkets. These - finished the year with asking races of $14.35, $15.70 and $9.99 m respectively. Class "A" office products in Downtown Boise are experiencing lease rates very close to asking prices. ~,=; Outlook We expect continued improvement in the office market during 2013. As the market gains strength, rates will begin to increase. In our estimation there are fewer landlord conces- sions being made now as compared to a year ago. l l 1 Y ar-End Office Vacancy by Submarket 50% 38% 26% a.a96 n:696 rzo96 tsrw >4~ 14% to % ~ ~~ ~ t 48% 2% c`' 'tc a`~ ~ ac V a~ m`' c~ c 10°1° 0a ~ . a ~a D ~ ra r ma oa c c o c a~ '~ C',aD qo~ yc y~°y ~°cO Vm co ~~ ac 3 O \~'. 0 ca 2 Year.-End Ranked Office Absorption by Submarket20~~I L c5,000 sr•~ 165,000 135,000 105,000 75,000 a 45,000 "~ 15,000 T ~' -_ N~ a~= c 2' 2013 Colliers Paragon LLC -All Rights ReservedMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 453 of 475 L3~ Overview The Treasure Valley retail market picked up momentum in the second half of 2012, and is trending better than similar sized met- ropolitan areas across the West. The overall vacancy rate has dropped to 9.1%, down from 12.3% a year ago. This is due in large part to the increased absorption in the "B" and "C" locations, as well as these three key events: i~~ Local businesses have been adding back employees. New-to-the-market retailers, either start-ups or fran- chisees are opening new stores. Chain retailers have adjusted to the shopping habit changes of their customers and are growing and morphing to meet their customer's needs. Rents are climbing, mainly on the "A" located centers. There remains a dichotomy between absorption and rents in the "A" locations versus the rest of the market. Even though "A" location absorption, lack of leasable space, firmer rents and fewer conces- sions have been a positive point in a dreary economy, other trends are emerging, such as leasing activity in off "A" locations. RETAI L market reviev~ Areas that were hit hardest are bouncing back, such as Glen- wood & State Street. Eighteen months ago, the vacancy rate at this intersection stood at 40%. Plantation Shopping Center was a "zombie" center, meaning it had space for lease but the owners were unwilling or unable to deliver space to prospects. Northgate Shopping Center was 25% vacant and an unanchored strip-center in front of Wal-Mart had one tenant and 80% vacancy. The recovery at these properties is like a snapshot of how the commercial market is rebounding. First, an investor/developer bought the note for Plantation Shopping Center. After foreclosing on the shopping center, he spent $2 million renovating the center. Today, Ross is open and anchors the newly renovated Plantation Shopping Center, which is 90% occupied. The unanchored strip center in front of Wal-Mart was bought by a tenant who took advantage of the best owner/user financ- ing market in 30 years. Northgate Shopping Center leased their problem space to Goodwill for a thrift store, bringing their occupancy up to 92%. 2 O 1 Anchored vs. Unanchored Vacant SF by Submarket 180000 45°10 PRIMARY USE 160000 Anchored 40% J Unanchored Shops 140000 r Vacancy 35°10 120000 i 30% d r d 100000 25% w o to 80000 13.55E 20% ~ 60000 15% 40000 8.4g' 9.vst, 8251,10% 7.556 736 20000 5% 0 0% ee~`r agve r~ey~cC.`~`l a`a~r~~a reay~r~es~0er~ra\o``ae d`¢oJ oJ`s, Ge~`~Ga d y e BOISE 755 WEST FRONT STREET, SUITE 300 BOISE, ID 83702 NAMPA 5660 EAST FRANKLIN ROAD, SUITE 110 NAMPA, ID 83687Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 454 of 475 t. >C?1 Inventory +& Vacancy Colliers International tracks approximately 20.7 million square feel of inventory in the Boise Metro market. This is based upon buildings and retail centers 5,000 square feet and larger (excluding the Boise Towne Square Mall). Vacancy declined dramatically in all but the following three submarkets in 2012: Meridian, Central Bench and the Southeast submarkets. Triple Net Asking Rates tJverall retail asking rates have risen in the second half of 2012. moving to $13.38 from $13.31 six months ago. Individual submarkets showing the highest increases in rental rates in 2012 were Can- yon County; increasing by 51.97 to X13.76 per square foot and the Northwest submarket; increasing by $1.05 to $12.50 per square Foot. 2 0 1 Y~-End Retail Inventory Distribution 35% 30~~~ ~~ 25°~ 20°, ae 15'x'0 9796 0 10°!° ~ c we 796 yX, 5% 4~. a~ ~ 0% , c.~ '°~ c~ ay. a ~ e ~~ Qo cD p ~`a 0a r J,ca mac `r a` ~a ``~v Vac~oc ~ ~ay yoo yo Crac``a 20 Va~D =o 2 0 1 Y/eLa~r-End Retail Average Triple Net Annual Asking Rates r 525.00 520.00 Staoo d 51 5.00 su.23 s>a29 513 76 0 m 51 [i i;' sit r/, yt 512.50 12.26 55 ra 50 00 c°`a~ ~'~~aac VCD Say aay a~ay r ac` J~`~ ac a rr J c Jr oye n``ora~D 2o yo Oo oa C~1 Tenants continue to lock into longer leases, averaging close to five ~ years, as opposed to the three year average term length prevalent A three years ago. ,,_ Outlook Expect more new retailers, especially quick service restaurants to enter the Treasure Valley in 2013. There will also be more deals - on "off-the-market" properties. For example, Chick-Fil-A made - a deal on Broadway to take a site where there was an operat- ' ing restaurant. More tenants will make plays for "A" properties ' and pay the high cost of the location. All grocery stores, includ- ing gourmet, Wal-Mart neighborhood, convenience, independent and discount grocery stores, will be major news stories in 2013. oY~a~ d Retail Ranked Absorption by submarket 475.000 375,000 275,000 a 175,000 Q tit n+~e 75,000 0 v mac ~a ~~ a`' ~ v h y cD 0ac ~a dam `oDC r °c~ mac `aa 1 a r a D ~ ~ ~ i Say ~ hoc ho ~a~ ca ~o ~0 20 mac Cra 2 01 Y/eLa~r-End Retail Vacancy by submarket 30% 25% 20 ° ~ tai96 T c 15°~~, tas%m u m 1U`~~ 8696 7.9f6 9.9% 6.296 6.891 A9% 7.0% ~ h796 5>, ~~~ A 0°,;, c~ ~ ~~ `ac cD aye aye aye c~ c~~ 0a 4'a ~~' ~a r `"a~ Jra r 0a `o~ Gac~`a ~a`D ~ 20` ?o` ~o you Say ac~ocV 2013 Colliers Paragon LLC -All Rights Reserved Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 455 of 475 Overview Lease rates throughout the Treasure Valley stabilized in the second half of 2012, and the gap between owner/tenant value expectation continues to close. The stabilization of rates has led to asking rates being much closer to deal rates in the second half of 2012. Industrial sales activity has increased during the second half of 2012, but is limited by the amount of inventory for sale. This demand is driven by two factors: companies purchasing space instead of leasing it, and healthier construction and trade sectors in the market. Attractive financing and a drop in prices allows users to purchase facilities and lease them back to corporate entities while maintaining a strong balance sheet. Inventory and Vacancy Colliers International tracks 1,136 industrial buildings containing more than 35.5 million square feet. A total of 3,330,999 square feet of industrial space is currently vacant, giving the valley a total vacancy rate of 9.4%. 2 O 1 Sum of Available SF by Primary Use and Submarket Southwark Meta! Manufacturing - Purchased 12.7 acres in Sky Ranch Business Park, Caldwell, and built a 79,500 square foot manufacturing plant expansion in Idaho. 58 lnvesUnents, LLC -Purchased 255 Steelhead Way in Boise, a b2,000 square foot former Applied Materials industrial facility; the buyer had a tenant in-tow. ATCO Structure & Logistics - Leased a 203,500 square foot building with 17 acres at the Gateway West Industrial Center in Pocatello for a new manufacturing site in Idaho. Dixon Contoiner Co. -Purchased 3210 E. Amity Road in Boise, a 53,000 square foot expansion facility located near their corporate headquarters. Greenstar Building Systems -Purchased 1425 Sun- nyside Road in Weiser, a 67,000 square foot manufac- turing building for a new production site. 250000 25% PRIMARY USE I] Flex 200000 Industrial /Manufacturing to o%20% I~ Warehouse /Bulk Space t Vacancy ti 150000 15% ~ a,a m c n 100000 to.3%11 e`~ -10% 8.6% 7.2% 7.3% 7.0% b.7% 50000 5% 0 0% Airport Central Downtown Eagle Garden Cily Meridian Southeast Southwest West Bench Bench Periphery NDUSTRIAL market review Notable transactions include: BOISE 755 WEST FRONT STREET, SUITE 300 BOISE, ID 83702 NAMPA 5bb0 EAST FRANKLIN ROAD, SUITE 110 NAMPA, ID 83687Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 456 of 475 I X01?_ Outlook Vacancy rates in 2013 will continue tv decline due to limited new costruction. Leasing activity should remain steady as the market recovers and landlords regain negotiating power. This may be the last year owner/users can take advantage of the low interest rates and SBA financing opportunities, as interest rates are expected to increase later in 2013. Owner/ users are looking to take advantage ofgovernment-backed financing options as well as historically low interest rates in 2013, hedg- ing that the financing market will change in the near future as the national economy continues to work through fiscal legislation. Sales activity will remain strong and values of existing buildings will increase as demand continues to exceed quality supply. In- 2 O 1 Y~-End Industrial Absorption by Submarket 350,000 340,000 250,000 200,000 i 150,0000 1DD,000 4 50,000 lwll 50,OD0 100 000 e ti~ Q y~ y~ 4 a v ~ Os .a a m Q Qa ~a V a3Dce0mc2aFSGmacPaaoJyo~c ~a °i c~ ~a150,000 ~ 0 3Iac o 3c Qo 2 O 1 Y~-End Industrial Inventory by Submarket 30°J° zm 25`. 20 ; ~, 0 0 15'S',; t395 1296 995 995 a 1a° ~ ~ O 6% U 5°%° . - ~ 4% 4% c ~ 0°0 . '~ aFQa `ya`O `D3a Dec` ~~Qo`` `aae ~¢~~ c ~ ,c a`0 Qe`~ Ravi y 1,ay ~ ao`~a ~a~ y° 3cVo 3c. O° D Z dustrial development will be limited to local developers who 0 are building to accommodate current relationships. While in- t` dustrial development will be limited, 2013 could be the year Cn when new speculative development is planned in anticipation of ~ increasing demand and the corresponding increase in lease rates. D There is still significant interest in distressed, bank owned, and ; property for auction, however there are few available sites. ~ making it a competitive segment. - Due to the lack of quality existing facilities available to purchase, ~ the industrial land market will gain momentum in Q3 and Q4 of ~_' 2013. eavEn~d IL stria) Average Triple Net Direct Asking Rates 51.20 51.05 50.90 d SODS o 50.60 m.59 Y 50.45 so.go iQA9 ~'~ ~,,,~ s0.so soa2 s0.a3 ~,~ f0.i4 9.46 a 50.30 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t• 50.15" St1.00 ' o~. c~ a~~ ~ ~~ `ac aye ~ °y~ ~~ Qa c`~a ~c c ~a~D ~! ~o ~o~ wag C, V°o 3c Qo 2 O Y aEnd Industrial Vacancy by Submarket I L 35°~~ 28°0 u 21 % ~.l)•96 c {~ e u 1a ^ B,tiY: 72% 6.7% ~ ~~ 7.096 5.895 3496 ~ D°l° 4 t~ ~Q' \~ aC N y~ 4 Qa y P``Qo 0~c ``Qv, ~aQ' d` ~a` oraa `3c 0°c ~aF a3 ec`~a c a ~a~D ~lr yo °J boy C, G o.~ 3c. Qo 2013 Colliers Paragon LLC -All Rights Reserved Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 457 of 475 C1 The Investment Market Sales of commercial real estate in 2012 continue to increase, recording over $283 billion worth of significant transactions, which represents a 24°~ increase from 2011. Apartments were the biggest mover, with transaction volume up 47%. Over one- third of all transactions were done on a portfolio or REIT basis. The primary drivers of this increase are: an improved econom- ic sentiment, a stronger lending environment, and an increased appetite of various funds to get off the sidelines. According to RC Analytics, overall commercial prices are within 20% of peak levels, albeit there are variations in value swings amongst property types. None of the 35 core markets have re- covered back to peak pricing, but 15 of those markets' apartment sectors have recovered back to, orabove peak pricing. The following West-based cities have apartment pricing that is higher than it was during the prior peak: San Francisco, San Jose, Seattle, Denver, and Oakland. These markets also saw some of the largest increases in transaction volume during 2012. Investment Year in Review Sales Volume ~ Pricing Trends Dlndlvidual QPoMollo QEnlYty Billions YoY Lhange 200° oo°~° m- D°/ 10D°!o 01 '02 03 ~Dd '05 -06 '07 'Otl '09 '10 '11 '11 GOISG 755 WEST FRONT STREET. SUITE 300 DOISE. ID 83702 Lending According to Amherst Securities, new defaults of commercial mort- gages fell to their lowest levels of the cycle in the fourth quarter of 2012. 80% of CMBS loans maturing were paid off, which is a vast improvement from where it's been. According to RC Analyt- ics, of the $394 billion of commercial mortgages becoming troubled over the past cycle, 58% have now been resolved and $164 billion remains to be worked out. Lenders have continually shown a healthier appetite to lend. Life insurance companies are starting to compete with Fannie and Fred- die on apartment loans. The CMBS market is making its way back, and local banks have improved their appetite for commercial loans on investment property. National Outlook The national sentiment is that the market looks healthy. Investment dollars will continue to chase core assets at a premium. The lending market should continue to support the transaction volume. Outside of core assets, the hottest sectors will continue to be apart- ments and single-tenant NNN, grocery-anchored, drug or dollar- store based retail. Regional Regionally, the West seems to be recovering at a healthier rate with more focused interest from investors. Three of the top five performing markets in 2012 in terms of overall volume were on the West coast (Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles). Sentiment from vested players is that 2013 will see continued improvement. Western cities account for nine of the top 20 performing apart- ment markets (San Jose, San Francisco, Orange County, San Diego, Seattle, Portland, Los Angeles, Denver, and Oakland). According to a survey done by Western Real Estate Business, most vested players believe that the market will continue to improve in 2013. Retail will continue to be strong, primarily because out-of-state investors understand quick-serve restaurants and dollar stores. They can translate well-located, high traffic locations with a good retail concept into a performing asset in any market. NAMPA 5660 EAST FRANKLIN ROAD, SUITE 110 NAMPA, ID 83687Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 458 of 475 1~12 Local The local investment market saw more activity in 2012 than re- cent years, and Boise has garnered national attention in 2012 as abusiness-friendly, recovering market. The Brookings Institute listed Boise as one of the 20 fastest recovering cities in the nation based on housing prices, growth, and employment statistics. KPMG declared that Boise is the lowest-cost city to do business in the West. From a transaction standpoint, the most active segments in the local market have been apartments and retail. Some sales of note occurring 2012 include: Doubletree Club Hotel, (158 rooms) Park River Apartments, (91 units) Woodbridge Apartments, (200 units) Lodge at Maple Grove Apartments, (154 units) Lancaster Apartments, (30 units) Pinebridge office (26,000 square feet) Eagle View Plaza retail (20,000) Chcrry Wood Plaza retail (15,800) From a development standpoint, strong indicators in multi- family have led to a healthy amount of building. From 2012 through 2013 we should see an increase in inventory of 8-10°~ to our market. Apartments completed or under construction: Boise State 1350 beds), River and 12th Sr. Housing l53 units), Affinity Senior Housing 1150 units), Union Square 1120 units), Regency at River Valley 1240 units), Gramercy l48 units), Crossfield 180 units), Brassy Cove (255 units), and Avondale Place 1200 units). Here are some other exciting projects of note: 8tli & Main: 269,000 square foot office tower anchored by Zions Bank, Holland & Hart, Ruths' Chris. Whole Foods: 150,000 square foot retail anchored by Whole Foods and Walgreens. LIMP: 100,000 square foot urban-interactive park with parking garage developed by Simplot. Z The Village at Meridian: 723,000 square foot ^. 200,000 carnplete) retail/lifestyle center in Meridian ~ on Eagle Road. ~ St Luke's Canyon County Expansion: 80,000 square feet Local Outlook The local market has experienced healthy absorption in the ~ office and retail segments. It has also seen stable occupancy in ~ apartments for the past 2'/z years. This has led to a strong push ~ in development of retail, office, and apartments. ~ Local transaction focus will be similar to national trends, with investors being primarily interested in apartments and retail. 02013 Colliers Paragon LLC - Afl Rights Reserved 2 O 1 Yea -End Average Cap Rates -United States Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 459 of 475 9 Outlook Activity throughout Canyon County was very strong in the second half of 2012. The declining unemployment rate, currently at 7.5%, has direct correlation to vacancy in the retail, office and indus- trial specialties, and has had a positive impact on real estate in the county. This was most notable in Downtown Nampa where the vacancy rate fell by 1.7% to its current rate of 4.4%. Canyon County vacancy rates have declined in the retail and industrial markets, ending the year at 8.9% and 10.9% respectively. How- ever, the overall Canyon County office market experienced an in- crease in overall vacancy, ending 2012 at 10.6%. There was an increased demand for mid-size industrial properties forsale ranging in size from 5,000-10,000 square feet in 2012. This demand was also present in the office market, which experienced an increase in owner/users who purchased office buildings in 2012. Available office space above 4,000 square feet in Canyon County is in short supply. Signature transactions and projects in 2012: Sout/twarks Building -Caldwell: 79,000 square ool build to-suit manufacturing plant for HVAC ducting. Franklin Flex -Nampa: 40,000 square foot invest- ment purchase of flex space Library Square -Nampa: 60,000 square foot new library, 34,500 square foot office /retail space, and 300-space parking garage I-84 Construction: The completion of an 8-lane ex- pansion from Nampa to Boise and the new 10-Mile ramp have greatly improved the connectivity between Ada and Canyon Counties. 2 0 1 Yep a -End Canyon County Office Market Caldwell 29 388,470 47,977 12.4%0 0.0%47,977 12.4%510.75 Downtown Nampa 38 420,280 18,679 4.4%0 0.0%18,679 4.4%511.41 Idaho Center 12 208,128 24,020 11.5%0 0.0%24,020 11.5%510.53 Karcher 25 292,955 25,996 36.3%0 0.0%25,996 8.9%n/a Middleton 1 6,000 0.0%0 O.D%0 0.0%n/a Norihside Nampa 3 38,194 11,015 28.8%0 0.0%11,015 28.8%n/a South Nampa 33 337,248 48,667 14.4% r 2760 r 0.8% r 51,427 15.2%510.66 r A::.~:<, •i; fir.: ru,t"~.f r,r., Ji.:~CJ.:. J:: 2 O ~ Yea -End Canyon County Retail Market Caldwell 44 945,865 88,174 4.3%0 0.0%88,174 9.3%510.20 Downtown Nampa 54 175,987 26,382 3.4%14,326 1.8%40,708 5.2%S9.T5 Idaho Center 36 1,327,091 148,953 11.2%0 0.0%148,953 11.2%516.21 Karcher 75 2,668,643 222,346 8.3%3,000 0.1%225,346 8.4%514.52 Northside Nampa 12 196,841 1,500 0.8%0 0.0%1,500 0.8%n/a South Nampa 30 709,961 60,217 8.5%0 0.0% r 60,217 8.5%513.15 BOISE 755 WEST FRONT STREET, SVITE 300 BOISE, 10 83702 NAMPA 5660 EAST FRANKLIN ROAD. SUITE 110 NAMPA, ID 83687Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 460 of 475 t ~ ?012 Nampa Submarket Activity in the Nampa subrnarket was very strong in 2012, espe- cially the demand for office space under 1,000 SF. The Down- town Nampa retail market experienced an increase in vacancy of 3.8%, and a decrease in asking rates of $0.23. There were several significant transactions in Nampa over the past 12 months that include: The Idaho Hop House leased 6,580 square feet in Downtown Nampa. The former Crescent Brewery sold in June, 2012. Wal-Mart purchased 12.51 acres of development ground. Deseret Industries leased 12,844 square feet of retail space in Holly Plaza. Caldwell Submarket 10 f7 Office vacancy rates in Caldwell increased in 2012 by 6.1% to 12.4%, while office asking rates decreased by $3.11 per square Z foot, ending the year at $10.75 per square foot. The Caldwell ~ Industrial market has remained stagnant in 2012, with a few Z large vacant facilities keeping vacancy high. ~ 0 Significant activity in Caldwell includes: C Sale of the former Blue Elephant car wash Idaho Center Submarket The Idaho Center Submarket is another bright spot in Canyon County, experiencing a decrease in office vacancy of 6.3%, and a decrease of 7.6°~ in retail vacancy over the past twelve months. I<archer Submarket Activity in Caldwell remained challenging in 2012. However, Gard- The Karcher Submarket experienced increased activity with ner Company announced a new 60,000 square foot medical office several new single end-user buildings constructed in 2012. development next to West Valley Medical Center, with construction Competitive lease rates are generating interest in good retail scheduled to begin in 2013. locations. Canyon County Industrial Market Caldwell 139 4,410,566 257,970 5.8%0 0.0°k 257,970 5.8%50.46 Downtown Nampa 14 234,723 2,500 1.1%0 0.0%2,500 1.1%n/a Idaho Center 52 1,851,026 364,870 19.7%0 0.0%364,870 19.7%50.38 Karcher 29 1,078,994 52,346 4.9%0 0.0%52,346 4.9%50.40 Northsidc Nampa 110 5,789,248 796,250 13.8%12,500 0.2%808,750 14.0%50.49 South Nampa 20 707,826 32,242 4.6 f,0 0.09E 32,242 4.6%EO.48 I Canyon County j ,I ~J ~l' Submarl<etst I - ~ © .:dletOn II -.-+ 0 _ _ ~i , J ~ '101 _ ~ I i © rho Center I I, - I I----------li I ~,,,• . , ~y ,wntown i - Q uth Nampa Ir =____~-__ ~tI-Nampa ~ ------ i ~., ., ~ ,rcher t . N.,.~ ~. 02013 Colliers Paragon LLC - Atl Rights ReservedMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 461 of 475 11 Overview Farm ground, commercial land, residential development, and finished residential lots were very active in 2012, however land for industrial use experienced a very low demand in 2012. The highest priced farm ground transaction reported in 2012 was an auction for $10,000 per acre on a 300 + acre property in Pleasant Valley, northwest of American Falls. This high price was due to the high rental rate for potato land in Eastern Idaho, which averages $800 per acre. By comparison, southwest Idaho farm ground leases have increased to $250 per acre with rates as high as $450. In all markets we saw medical, retail, service and commercial users taking advantage of lower land prices. In the summer of 2012, Ridley's Grocery Store, asmall-footprint regional grocer, purchased a 30+ acre site in North Kuna for a future store. Supply and Demand Ab~~orption of single fornily house lots continues at a manageable and sustainable level in Southwest Idaho with 3,916 single family detached home building permits issued for all of southern Idaho in 2012. Demand for development land is low with most builders and investors concentrating their efforts on the vacant developed house lots left over from the housing market downturn in 2007. Canyon County residential lots are experiencing an increase in demand. Outlook In 2013 we expect a slight leveling in residential land prices. The recent rapid increases in residential land, lot and finished new home pricing will create a price pull-back. Industrial land prices and demand will continue at their current low level throughout 2013. Farm land prices will spike even higher with the next round of land offerings driven by an increase in demand. Expect transactions to occur in the $4,000 to $6,000 per acre range. The supply of new single family lots in Ada County will continue to come from the con- struction of small, manageable phases of existing and new subdivi- sions. Canyon County still has too many vacant developed lots to warrant much new-lot construction. However, just like Ada County, where demand has absorbed the supply of existing lots, Canyon County developers will build new lots in specific areas of demand. 2 01 Nwe Construction Home Sales & Inventory by County 7000 Sum of Supply, Ncw COnStrUCllOn 6000 Sum of Sales, Ne Canslr ctionwu 5000 400D c a 3000 2000 rv IODD' IAA 0 D N 07 p~ O N ~ 0, ~, ~, O~ O O O O T ~ O O o N m V~ O .- N_ .p hOOOOQ, Q, O p~ O N n v of .O 1~ m o~ O_ ~_ N O~ O O O O O O O O O O p. p. O" p, O O O O r r r r N N N N O O N N O O O O O O O p, p. N N N N N' N N ~ r p. p. O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ada Canyon BOISE 755 WEST FRONT STREET, SUITE 300 BOISE, ID 83702 NAMPA 5660 EAST FRANKLIN ROAD, SUITE 110 NAMPA, ID 83687 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 462 of 475 012 l1~` ~~ ILL ~.UI i I~I CI It=i iJi v~ ~~~ilJ~l~_ _ 1 office market changes f rom 2011 -~ 2 ~ 1 ~ number of number of Asking ~ CEASES SAES RATES VACANCY OFFICE - i i i %~i r i CenlralBench 101 1,914,454 409,275 0 409,275 21.4% 18,822 Downtown 77 3,701,536 288,625 94,357 382,982 10.3% 78,923 Downtown Periphery 76 1,891,463 84,031 6,800 90,831 4.8% 100,043 Eagle 59 725,538 108,322 2,150 110,472 15.2% 79,813 Meridian 142 2,484,094 481,453 0 481,453 19.4% 115,775 N. End/N. West/Garden City 44 557,537 81,877 0 81,877 14.7% 33,170 Southeast 51 1,375,929 225,960 0 225,960 16.4% 46,192 Southwest 50 872,674 186,733 0 186,733 21.4% -4,623 West Bench 145 2,719,396 581,142 45,532 626,674 23.0% 39,696 Canyon County 147 1,751,657 179,114 0 179,114 10.2% 50,280 2 O 1 Y~-End Office Full Service Asking Rates by Building Class es.ooo. sFt Central E3ench 59.99 515.08 59.76 59.20 Downtown 517.45 519.83 316.12 511.75 Downtown Periphery 519.92 522.87 517.29 n/a Eagle 513.88 515.06 511.98 n/a Meridian 516.96 517.41 515.33 n/a North/Northwest/Garden City S1T.96 516.85 514.90 513.50 Southeast 515.70 576.03 f15.75 513.50 Southwest 514.35 514.35 n/a n/a West Bench 512.96 514.66 512.53 511.17 Canyon County 512.98 516.55 512.29 512.00 n/o -Hers ServKt Rm eQe~tO m CMns / S~ov+e m2013 Colliers Paragon LLC -All Rights ReservedMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 463 of 475 13 retail market changes from 2011 number of number of Asking LEASES SAES RATES VACANCY i i `.~_ i err -.u ~ Retail Submarket Statistics at a Glance i Central Bench 55 1,339,402 181,051 0 181,051 13.5%57,306 511.44 Eagle 27 b55,850 54,000 1,327 55,327 8.4%256,707 514.23 Garden City 30 770,614 57,810 0 57,810 7.5%101,624 59.91 Meridian 114 3,650,196 250,295 0 250,295 6.9%289,335 514.24 North End 10 193,772 13,499 0 13,499 7.0%33,227 516.00 Northwest 32 831,222 82,239 0 82,239 9.9%51,664 312.50 Southeast 45 1,430,919 260,825 0 260,825 18.2%60,261 514.82 Southwest 38 1,667,308 110,327 1,820 112,147 6.7%109,577 513.64 West Bench 100 3,547,527 288,256 1,431 289,687 8.2%416,126 512.28 Canyon County 261 6.624,388 564,898 17,329 582.227 9.8^/136.838 313.76 i i~i i O 1 Yea -End Retail Full Service Asking Rates by Primary Use cs,ooo sa:+1 Central Bench 511.44 514.50 511.25 59.29 Eagle 514.23 520.00 513.47 514.40 Garden City 59.91 n/a 510.60 59.27 Meridian 514.29 517.18 513.26 315.16 North End 516.00 n1a 518.38 510.00 Northwest 512.50 570.67 511.64 E12.25 Southeast 514.82 513.87 516.62 512.85 Southwest 513.64 E13.39 515.78 512.13 West Bench 512.28 E13.84 571.76 511.39 Canyon County 573.76 513.50 513.59 512.20 BOISE 755 WEST FRONT STREET. SUITE 300 BOISE, ID 93702 NAMPA 5660 EAST FRANKLIN ROAD, SUITE 110 NAMPA, ID 83687Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 464 of 475 012 INDUSTRIAL comprehensive statisticC INDUSTRIAL Yom, zoo industrial market changes from 2011 number of number of Asking LEASES SALES RATES VACANCY Industrial Submarket Statistics at a Glance i Airport 91 3,351,156 263,235 25,865 289,100 8.6%259,049 50.40 Central Bench 73 2,005,936 143,945 0 143,945 7.2%180,836 50.41 Downtown Periphery 35 766,652 51,589 0 51,589 6.7%1,856 50.48 Eagle 10 289,132 21,028 0 21,028 T.3%16,020 50.59 Garden City 108 1,563,604 163,564 0 163,564 10.396 61,875 50.44 Meridian 137 3,337,239 232,638 0 232,638 T.0%280,193 50.50 Southeast T9 4,613,095 145,650 9,690 155,340 3.4%72,308 50.42 Southwest 87 1,577,300 274,042 25,359 299,401 19.0%108,888 50.43 West Bench 152 3,862,514 426,716 27,000 455,716 11.8%284,679 50.42 Nampa 225 9,661,817 1,248,208 12,500 1,260,708 13.0%60,500 50.44 C~Idwrll 139 4,410,566 257,97Q 0 257,970 5.8%57,??7 50.46 r 2 01 Y~-End Industrial Full Service Asking Rates by Primary Use cs,ooo ss.1 Airport 50.40 50.59 50.35 50.37 Central Bench 50.41 50.52 50.57 50.38 Eagle 50.59 50.6?50.55 n/a Garden City 50.44 50.52 50.49 50.33 Meridian 50.50 50.64 50.42 50.49 Southeast 50.42 n/a 50.48 50.41 Southwest 50.43 50.50 50.48 50.48 West Bench 50.42 50.77 30.37 50.39 Canyon County 50.44 50.43 50.50 50.37 No - M1b ruY So~+c'>3.a q'~aM ar Wu! S+tmwfm 14~ 2013 Colliers Paragon LLC -All Rights ReservedMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 465 of 475 1~~~~~I• CCIh1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 466 of 475 012 Management George Iliff Managing Owner & Office Assaiate 52.472.2858 Tr - age I w Manglos caM. slog ciatc H~ /2.2841 Karen warner, caM Asociate 7084846172 t.n un .rear rer!dwlln-r,tnm cr~t' Fei:~f~rncr A•:;ociate f 7!!8 443 5107 Matt Palmer Associate 7nx 477 2a36 i , t I;elr ;c nr..~rl ..•i ~, t r;,.. C~rokcrage Mike Christensen A~ssaaate zox 47z za66 r•.d.,=._i.~...~a_.,~•riT~.,ILr~,iarr oualc a s„721047- ~~~~ rCrrart~_C are 7l; As~.auale qua ~,~z.2a3s t'"0o'~_blJkCSlte f~COlliefS.COT 1~~.~ ~ -••~~~; r~1 Research C.ive Fernandez Cn-ector of Marketing 1.5472.2868 yr `r.. n3 r,.~r 'tir..,'.,ia.• gyp-^~ Johnson r•:carch Analyst 477 7860 II-.v._ ,r-.~~1 Brokerage Clay Anderson cPA. MBA Associate Z08.494.6i77 dy. d nd~f5pn:'~COiii~ fS.C4m ir:vid war actor of Investment Services x 477 7R44 1 .,.. ~ r r :. • Dyne Slaughter cctM.MeA ociate 472 2853 . r ,n.~.p-r' r,llir r-~,. r ~~an 'A'all w F r.rnsaclion Coordinator 70& 472.2854 6i :an-~h al "I1culliNr ec urr Steve Foster Associate F 7fr$ 472 7834 rvni C1~UCn, ~..~~a a Associate 208472.1b68 j h'',ck Scruton SOCIatC ii 477 2857 c Tucker ociate riR Kf7 78~i2 inda King h+akcr Assistant 3:;8.472.2863 hr~da king(dcolliers.com Camille Shaffer Research Assistant J8 4 /2 "1857 cry ., ;n.... r-~mi 412013 Colliers Paragon LLC -All Rights Reserved l ~~ ,ge nn Starr Associate 208.472.2838 Jimmy Rourn6ni~ a %,ssociate o~n r~ 2840 rrr ~r,.~r r~ wnty Brokerage Todd Moss M:~:ociatc r~ ; f)x ri'l71665 P,f,kP i'en~e Associate ZOB 472 16G6 rid., ~ •i,:'"lr:~ ir.i t ~ncoln Hagood r, Associate i" 'nR 47? 1667 r:i nl . ~ -.err u~t ;ors;.~. n ::ociare T:)ft 472 1663 n Vrint ~: u,,r,°. rh n1~^r. r nrn Au ~ -~~'I ~:rices i[11 Pltl(ett CAI, AARE ociate U8 250 4767 I:'~ _:nagement l:1 ~.e Attiani Ilrector of Property Services i, ,rte r;.9 477 2867 4 Project Manager 7U8 472 2664 pr.`r•.dr~pr.-r +i[rd: b`ry r;, r.r 0 r r m 1 D Q D r Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 467 of 475 n 0 N n O 3 c 0 o c ~ cn m ~ ~ W tD p O w O "" W T i O O ~ N Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 468 of 475 Appendix G. City of Meridian FY2014-FY2025 Capital Improvement Plan Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 469 of 475 Admin Parking Lot Development 300,000 300,000 2,000 Sum of Admin 300,000 300,000 2,000 Fire Fire Engine -Heavy Rescue Tender 380,000 380,000 5,000 Fire Engine - MF005 520,000 520,000 5,000 Fire Engine -Station #4 -Quint Ladder T 1,100,000 1,100,000 10,000 Fire Engine -Station #6 -Heavy Rescue 700,000 700,000 10,000 Fire Engine -Station #7 -Quint Ladder T 1,100,000 1,100,000 10,000 Fire Engine -Station #8 520,000 520,000 5,000 Fire Station #6 2,230,000 2,230,000 150,000 Fire Station #6 Staff (12)0 1,243,592 Fire Station #6 Staff (3) -Floaters 0 310,898 Fire Station #7 2,020,000 2,020,000 150,000 Fire Station #7 Staff (3) -Floaters 0 310,898 Fire Station #7 Staff {9)0 932,694 Fire Station #8 2,020,000 2,020,000 150,000 Fire Station #8 Staff (12)0 1,243,592 Fire Station #8 Staff (4) -Floaters 0 414,531 Fire Station Staff (1) -Fire Inspector 0 103,632 Fire Station Staff (3) -Battalion Chiefs 0 421,738 Fire Station Staff (9) -Floaters 0 932,694 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Opitcom 20,000 20,000 Purchase Station #5 from Rural 806,000 806,000 Thursday, November 07, 2013 Page 1 of 6Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 470 of 475 Replace Brush MF022 145,000 145,000 Replace Engine MF009 520,000 520,000 Replace Engine MFO10 520,000 520,000 Replace Engine MF014 520,000 520,000 Replace Engine MF018 520,000 520,000 Replace Ladder Truck MF021 1,100,000 1,100,000 Replace Staff MF015 41,600 41,600 Replace Staff MF016 41,600 41,600 Replace Staff MF020 41,600 41,600 Replace Staff MF023 41,600 41,600 Replace Staff MF024 41,600 41,600 Replacement Equipment- Air Unit MF00 98,000 98,000 Replacement Equipment- Breathing Ap 380,000 380,000 Sum of Fire 8,231,000 $7,376,000 15,607,000 495 000 5,914,269 IT Additional Operating Costs 0 20,000 Dark Fiber 500,000 500,000 Network Administrator 0 43,000 Phone Purchase-VOIP 212,500 212,500 Replace Computers 115,150 115,150 Replace Computers 148,800 148,800 Replace Computers 108,750 108,750 Replace Computers 117,250 117,250 Replace Computers 491,000 491,000 Replace Computers 365,000 365,000 Replace IT Hardware 80,000 80,000 Replace IT Hardware 80,000 80,000 14,000 Replace IT Hardware 30,000 30,000 Replace IT Hardware 80,000 80,000 40,000 Replace IT Pool Car 20,000 20,000 Software Engineer 0 43,000 Web Developer 0 43,000 Sum of IT 2,348,450 2,348,450 74,000 129,000 Thursday, November 07, 2013 Page 2 of 6Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 471 of 475 Parks 77 Acre Park Design (77 Acres)750,000 750,000 Aldape Park Construction (60 Acres)2,100,000)0 Aldape Park Construction (60 Acres)8,520,000 2,100,000 10,620,000 360,000 ATV/Trailer 12,000 12,000 500 Ball Field Groomer 10,000 10,000 500 Borup Park Construction (47 Acres)6,674,000 6,674,000 282,000 Field House (YMCA)460,000 1,540,000 2,000,000 Field House (YMCA)1,250,000 1,250,000 142,000 75,000 Grounds Keeper I 0 45,000 Grounds Keeper I 0 45,000 Grounds Keeper I 0 45,000 Grounds Keeper II 0 59,000 Grounds Keeper II 0 59,000 Highlands Park Construction (7 Acres)994,000 245,000 1,239,000 21,000 Highlands Park Construction (7 Acres)245,000)0 Hillsdale Park Construction (20 Acres)3,540,000 700,000 4,240,000 60,000 Hillsdale Park Construction (20 Acres)700,000)0 Isola Park Construction (7 Acres)245,000)0 Isola Park Construction (7 Acres)994,000 245,000 1,239,000 21,000 Large Area Mower 55,000 55,000 2,000 Large Area Mower 55,000 55,000 2,000 Mule 12,000 12,000 1,000 Mule 12,000 12,000 1,000 Mule 12,000 12,000 1,000 Mule 12,000 12,000 1,000 Pathway Connections 100,000 100,000 Pathway Connections 100,000 100,000 5,000 Pathway Connections 100,000 100,000 5,000 Pathway Connections 100,000 100,000 Pathway Connections 150,000 150,000 5,000 Pathway Connections 150,000 150,000 5,000 Pathway Connections 150,000 150,000 5,000 Thursday, November 07, 2013 Page 3 of 6Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 472 of 475 Pathway Connections Pathway Connections Rails With Trails Rails With Trails Replacement Equipment -Adventure Isl Replacement Equipment- Bear Creek Pa Replacement Equipment -Gordon Harri Replacement Equipment -Renaissance Replacement Equipment- Seasons Park Replacement Equipment- Storey Park Replacement Equipment -Tully Park Replacement Vehicles/Equipment Replacement Vehicles/Equipment Replacement Vehicles/Equipment Replacement Vehicles/Equipment Replacement Vehicles/Equipment Replacement Vehicles/Equipment Replacement Vehicles/Equipment Replacement Vehicles/Equipment Replacement Vehicles/Equipment Storey Park Construction (5 Acres) Sweeper/Blower The Oaks Park Construction (7 Acres) The Oaks Park Construction (7 Acres) Trailer Trim Mower Trim Mower Trim Mower Trim Mower Trim Mower Truck Truck Truck 150,000 150,000 385,000 385,000 690,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 40,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 710,000 994,000 115,000 115,000 18, 000 7,500 20,000 20, 000 20,000 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 245,000) 245, 000 150,000 5,000 150,000 5,000 500,000 500,000 690,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 40,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 128,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 710,000 25,000 18,000 1,000 0 1,239,000 21,000 7,500 1,000 20,000 1,000 20,000 1,000 20,000 1,000 20,000 1,000 20,000 1,000 25,000 3,000 25,000 3,000 25,000 3,000 Thursday, November 07, 2013 Page 4 of 6Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 473 of 475 Police Code Enforcement Officer (1) Crime Prevention (1) Parking Enforcement Officer (1) Planning and Research (1) Police Attorney (1) Police Corporals (2) Police Detectives (2) Police Detectives (2) Police Lt (2) Police Officer - K9 (1) Police Officer -Motorcycle (1) Police Officers (2) Police Officers {3) Police Officers (3) Police PIO (1) Police Sgt {1) Police Station Expansion 800,000 Police Substation -Fire Station #5 Police Substation -Fire Station #6 Police Substation -Fire Station #7 Police Substation at The Village Police Trainer {1) Police Trainer {1) Replace Vehicles 300,000 Replace Vehicles 300,000 Replace Vehicles 300,000 Replace Vehicles 300,000 60,000 120,000 60,000 120,000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 60,000 120,000 60,000 120,000 0 0 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 100,000 62,000 77,000 63,000 80,000 121,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 244,000 101,000 97,000 170,000 255,000 255,000 70,000 111,000 95,000 95,000 Thursday, November 07, 2013 Page 5 of 6 Truck $25,000 $25,000 $3,000 Truck/Plow $35,000 $35,000 $3,000 Turf Sprayer $40,000 $40,000 $1,000 William Watson Park Construction (7 Ac $736,030 $736,030 $21,000 Sum of Parks $16,930,030 $12,134,500 $0 $2,790,000 $35,389,530 $1,020,000 $328,000 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 474 of 475 Replace Vehicles 300,000 300,000 Replace Vehicles 300,000 300,000 Replace Vehicles 300,000 300,000 Replace Vehicles 300,000 300,000 Replace Vehicles 300,000 300,000 Replace Vehicles 300,000 300,000 Training Center $1,775,000 $1,225,000 $3,000,000 $300,000 Sum of Police $5,575,000 $1,585,000 $7,160,000 $400,000 $2,496,000 Grand Total 533.384.480 512.134.500 57.376.000 $1.585.000 50 52.790.000 $60.804.980 51.991.000 58.867.269 Thursday, November 07, 2013 Page 6 of 6Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda January 9, 2018 – Page 475 of 475 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 9 Project/File Number: Future Meeting Topics Meetinq Notes City Council Meeting Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 10 Project/File Number: Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(f): To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated and 74-206(1)0): To consider labor contract matters authorized under section 67-2345A [74-206A](1)(a) and (b), Idaho Code. Meetina Notes ✓ SgiM opt 16 PM