The URL can be used to link to this page

2017-11-14Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 14, 2017 – Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 1. City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 3:00 PM 1. Roll-Call Attendance X Anne Little Roberts O Joe Borton X Ty Palmer X Keith Bird __X___ Genesis Milam __O___ Luke Cavener X Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted as amended 4. Consent Agenda Approved A. Approval of PO # 18-0111 for E. Pine Avenue Landscaping and Improvements to Ada County Highway District for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $415,755.00. This Purchase Order is issued in conjunction with the Cost Share Permit approved by Council 09/27/17. B. Approval of Cooperative Agreement between the City and Valley Regional Transit for “Annual Dues and Service Contribution” for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $210,938.00. C. Tree Farm Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement #1 D. Tree Farm Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement #2 E. James Court Pedestrian Pathway Easement #6 F. Volterra Heights Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement G. REVISED Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Rockbury Subdivision (H-2017-0018) by Rock Harbor Church, Inc. Located 6437 N. Tree Haven Way H. City Financial Report for September 2017 I. AP Invoices for Payment - $2,752,271.44 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AMENDED MEETING AGENDA Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 14, 2017 – Page 2 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 5. Items Moved From the Consent Agenda 6. Department Reports A. Public Safety Annual Report - Police and Fire Departments B. Finance: Quarterly Update C. Police Department/Code Enforcement Division: Proposed Updates to Nuisance Code D. Public Works: Proposed Update to MCC 9-4-24 E. Legal: Updates to City Code provisions regarding Chief Financial Officer/Information Services Director 1. Ordinance No. 17-1753: An Ordinance of the City of Meridian Amending Meridian City Code Section 1-8-1, Regarding Appointment of Department Officials by Mayor; Repealing Title 1, Chapter 8, Article E, Meridian City Code; Amending Meridian City Code Section 1-9-3(G)(7), Regarding Compensation Changes; Amending Meridian City Code Section 1-8B-2, Regarding Duties of the Chief Financial Officer; and Providing an Effective Date. Continued to November 21, 2017 F. Community Development/Building Services Division: Emissions Testing Facilities - Permitting Recommendation G. Community Development/Planning Division: Idaho Avenue Amenities - Transfer of Ownership from Meridian Development Corporation to City of Meridian and Next Steps 1. Resolution No. 17-2048: Joint Resolution of Meridian Development Corporation and City of Meridian Signifying Transfer by MDC and Acceptance by City of Idaho Avenue Decks, Planters, and Bicycle Rack Continued to December 5, 2017 H. Parks Department: South Meridian Regional Park Update I. Fire Department: Bear Creek Park and Fire Station #6 Review of Actions and Decisions To Date and Outline for Community Outreach and Decision Process Moving Forward 7. Action Items Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 14, 2017 – Page 3 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. A. Public Hearing Continued from June 6, 2017 for 2017 UDC Text Amendment (H-2017-0044) by City of Meridian Planning Division Continued to December 5, 2017 1. Request: Text Amendment to Certain Sections of the UDC Pertaining to Definitions; Allowed Uses in all Districts; Specific Use Standards (Home Occupation and Retail Store, Wine and Beer Sales and Servings); Surety Agreements AND Establish New Definitions and Regulations to Allow the Operation of Food and Beverage Products Processing, Minor in the Commercial, Industrial and Traditional Neighborhood Zoning Districts 8. Future Meeting Topics 9. Amended Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(d): To consider records that are exempt from disclosure as provided in chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code and 74-206(1)(c): To acquire an interest in real property which is not owned by a public agency. Into Executive Session at 7:02pm Out of Executive Session at 8:22pm Adjourned at 8:22pm Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017. A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, November 14, 2017, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Ty Palmer, Genesis Milam and Anne Little Roberts. Members Absent: Joe Borton and Luke Cavener. Others Present: Bill Nary, C.Jay Coles, Caleb Hood, Jeff Lavey, Brian Harper, Mark Niemeyer, Tom Baker, Mike Barton, and Brent Bjornson. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Roll call. X__ Anne Little Roberts _ _ _Joe Borton X__ Ty Palmer X__ Keith Bird __X___Genesis, Milam ______ Lucas Cavener __X Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: Okay. Well, welcome to our City Council meeting. We appreciate you all joining us. Thank you to our police officers in the audience as well. So, with that I will go ahead and start tonight's -- or today's City Council workshop. For the record it is Tuesday, November 14th. It's a minute after 3:00. We will start with roll call attendance, Mr. Clerk. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance De Weerd: Item No. 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in the pledge to our flag. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Adoption of the Agenda De Weerd: Item 3 is adoption of the agenda. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: On the agenda Item 6-E, the ordinance number is 17-1753. Item 6-G, the revolution number is 17-2048. And Item 9, the Executive Session, we add the -- need to add the letter (c) to the Executive Session. With that I move we approve the amended agenda. Milam: Second. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 2 of 68 Palmer: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the agenda as amended . All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Item 4: Consent Agenda A. Approval of PO # 18-0111 for E. Pine Avenue Landscaping and Improvements to Ada County Highway District for the Not-to- Exceed amount of $415,755.00. This Purchase Order is issued in conjunction with the Cost Share Permit approved by Council 09/27/17. B. Approval of Cooperative Agreement between the City and Valley Regional Transit for “Annual Dues and Service Contribution” for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $210,938.00. C. Tree Farm Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement #1 D. Tree Farm Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement #2 E. James Court Pedestrian Pathway Easement #6 F. Volterra Heights Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement G. REVISED Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Rockbury Subdivision (H-2017-0018) by Rock Harbor Church, Inc. Located 6437 N. Tree Haven Way H. City Financial Report for September 2017 I. AP Invoices for Payment - $2,752,271.44 De Weerd: Item 4 is the Consent Agenda. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve the Consent Agenda as published and for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 3 of 68 Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda . If there is no discussion, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Bird, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, absent; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Item 5: Items Moved From the Consent Agenda Item 6: Department Reports A. Public Safety Annual Report - Police and Fire Departments De Weerd: Under Department Reports we will start our workshop with public safety annual reports and we will start with our fire -- our Police Department. I was going to say Fire Department, but -- Lavey: But you wanted to start with the best. De Weerd: I'm not getting involved in that one. Lavey: Or is that best -- best is last, right, Mark? Madam Mayor, Council, thank you for the time today. Before I get started I would just like to say that back in our budget workshops several months ago we were successful in having you approve a couple of new lieutenant positions and I would just like to introduce them to you as we speak, because one of the new lieutenants is going to remain here for the rest of the evening, so you can break him in properly. So, it's Lieutenant Sean Harper. If you could stand up and be recognized. And Lieutenant Mark Ford back there. So, congratulations, gentlemen, on your recent promotions. De Weerd: Congratulations. Well earned. Lavey: Madam Mayor, each November it's our pleasure to give a public safety briefing. Police and Fire come forward and give kind of a strategic update of what's been going on in their departments and we alternate back and forth who goes first . It looks like we drew the short straw and get to go first today. Before I get started I just want to say that I want to thank the men and women of the Meridian Police Department, because our success is -- is because of them. Our reputation in our community, the work that we do for the recognition we get, is entirely on their should ers and so I just wanted to thank them for what they do for us and our community. One of our strategic objectives for the Police Department is to establish Meridian as a premier safe community. That's one thing that Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 4 of 68 we pride ourselves on as -- as professionals, but it's also you electives have also prided yourself on that and, really, it's something that we cherish and that's recognized each and every budget year when you approve the resources that -- that we request to preserve what we have. The objective that we were operating under in -- in 2016, 2015 was to become one of the top 100 safest cities nationally and we have achieved that . We always have achieved that. But the good news is this last year we were at 49th and this year we are at -- at 45th. So, I don't know if it's moving down, moving up, how you look at that, but all I know is that we are getting better results and so we are currently at the 45th safest city within the United States and that's something to be proud of . So, I think since we had achieved that you wanted to make it just a little bit harder for me and we recently updated that objective. When we set that challenge to become the safest city in Idaho regardless of size -- now I'm trying to be optimistic. I don't know if we will ever be able to achieve that, but it is a challenge that we take and is a challenge that I think is worthy of it and -- and it's something that we will strive for. So, it might be a little tougher than the other one, but we will do that. Just wanted to give you -- this -- a couple of these benchmarks that we have here were provided to you a week or so ago, maybe two weeks ago, in the quarterly benchmarks. But we just wanted to highlight some of the -- the calls for service, because it really plays into the discussion we have later on today. But you can just see there the amount of calls for service that we had for each quarter of 2017 thus far. We haven't completed the fourth quarter of 2017, so I don't have those -- those numbers for you yet. You're going to see a little bit of fluctuation, but it's pretty consistent throughout the year. One of the things that we always talk about when we look at are our response times and it's something that we pride ourselves on, but also concern ourselves over as well. We have three response times, code one, code two, code three . Code one being a nonpriority report type call. Code two is an urgent call, such as maybe an alarm or something. And, then, code three is an emergency call where a potential life is being threatened. Maybe a violent domestic or robbery in progress or something like that. Just to wrap your mind around that. We tend to look at three to five minutes for -- for a response time on code three calls and we are still within that range, but we are in the upper end of that range and it makes me a little nervous . We are sitting around four minutes. And last year we were at three and a half minutes and so we have seen an increase in our response time. Now, that can be due to a number of factors as far as positions having been filled, light duty, traffic, construction, a whole bunch of things . So, it's one of the things that we look at, not alarmed, but just something that we -- we pay attention to. And, then, if you look -- and that's that red line there -- on there is the code three calls. The yellow line is the code two calls and we have made progress there. But that's waiting up to eight minutes on average to get a police office r there on an urgent type call. And, then, something that -- that we can be quite proud of, because other agencies our size often take hours to get a police officer there to do a report and we can, on average, get a police officer there in about 15 minutes and so if you call for our police department to file a report, such as a theft discovered overnight or something like that, generally it will take us about 15 minutes to get there. I notice that Councilman Borton is absent today and, really, this next part of the presentation was at his request and if you recall back in April we gave a presentation on patrol allocation model. A PAM model is what we called it. It's a staffing model that takes a look at several different factors and makes the determination of -- of what our staffing level should be, rather than just take a Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 5 of 68 simple officer per thousand comparison and that's what we presented to Council at that time and one of the things that Councilman Borton had to ask for was several different scenarios of what ifs. What if you changed this? What if you changed that. And so we put several scenarios together. We are going to go really fast on this. The slides are going to look kind of busy to you. So, I have a presentation that I'm going to give you as well, so you can follow along. And, then, really, what we are asking you to do is just reflect on what we have to say today and, then, I will come back in front of you at your request and we will talk about it more in depth. And also I would invite anybody that -- that has more questions to come sit with us face to face, one on one, and we will answer those questions for you as well, because it does get pretty -- pretty in depth. So, let me pass these out. Beth, did we send an electronic copy to the clerk's office or do they need a hard copy? Okay. Well, we will get you an electronic copy, C.Jay. So, Madam Mayor, Council, if you recall we actually hired a consultant -- well, let me back up even further. Two years ago we actually had a couple of internal staff prepare a staff ing study for us. Beth Erickson and Sarah Skimmyhorn and they did a phenomenal job. We were really impressed, but as we are growing at a very rapid rate we wanted to have a third party review to just really validate the work and, really, to justify that we weren't just tel ling you that we needed more people, that we actually had a third-party that actually agreed with us. And, then, also the consultant was to come up with a methodology that we could present to Council and, hopefully, eventually, have an agreement for a level of service, somewhat like what the Police Department -- or, excuse me, what the Fire Department did last year. And so all we did is we come up with a -- well, we didn't come up with it, it's a model that's been in -- in existence for 20 years that takes in several different data points and if you look at your -- either the screen or your presentation in front of you, it takes in roadway data, workload data, operations. It looks at, you know, arterial roadways, collector roadways, local roadways. It makes some recommendations on staffing and as you recall when we gave that -- when we did that model back in April, we used the data that was available to us at that time and the roadways had only been updated since 2014 in the database that we were using. Since then we have gotten 2017 roadway statistics and so the first scenario that we did was updated the roadways within the City of Meridian. Just allow me to give you a small -- or a short definition of -- of arterials and collectors and local -- actually, let me back up. So, one of the things that we had to make a determination was is how often we patrol those roadways. You will see on that slide in front of you is that we determined that a patrol officer every two hours on an arterial, a patrol frequency of twice a week on a collector, and a patrol frequency of once a week in -- in the neighborhoods and if you recall I told you is that the community expectation was probably much higher, but we put in a very conservative approach . When we put all that into place we came up with 73 patrol officers for FY-18 and Council approved those -- those positions. So, we were good there, based upon the study. If you go back and update just the roadways, the amount of roadways that you have annexed into the City of Meridian since 2014, it would be a total of 150 miles of -- of arterial roadways. Just up there gives you an idea of the type of arterials . Cherry Lane. Eagle Road. Interstate 84. Parts of Locust Grove. Linder Road. A hundred and fifty miles. And, then, we have 18 -- well, I will round up to 19 miles of collector roadways in the city. Hickory. Tower Bridge. Chateau. These are just examples. There -- there are many more out there. And, then, local roadways. We currently have approximately 428 miles Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 6 of 68 of local roadways within our subdivisions that we are tasked with patrolling. Now, if you go and take all those figures -- those updated figures, run it through the model we presented to you in April, you would need 77 officers. So, if you look at this map -- or this slide here, if you look at the red, that's the only thing that we updated. Those numbers I just gave you, 150, 18.75, 427, those are the updated numbers from the information that was to your left. So, the left part of this slide has the old numbers that we gave, the red box has the updated numbers for 2018 . That's the only change that was done to the model for the scenario, is adjusted the roadways that were added within the city limits of Meridian. And if you see that at the top of the page it says 77 officers. Now, on this next one we -- trying to -- okay. So, on this one here is what if we added patrol officers into the neighborhoods twice a week. Or no. I'm -- that's on this one. So, on this one is what would happen if I added police officers in the neighborhoods twice a week, what would it take. And, then, it lists the amount of officers at 77. And, then, the next slide that -- I want to talk about is -- if you recall the presentation, we gave you an estimated speed within the roadways and it was just an average speed that was taken for the model. Our staff has gone in and examined the actual speed limits of every roadway that goes into this model and made a more precise decision as to what those speeds are . When you add in the proper speeds and not the guess or the average speed, leaving all the other things unchanged, other than the updated roadways, it gets you 81.5 officers. Now, we haven't figured out how to add a half officer, so we rounded it up to 80 -- 82. Now, on this next slide we took the updated roadways, the updated speed, and we added the frequency of patrols within the local neighborhoods . Calculated that and if you look at that it comes up with 84.7 and that's even harder to divide, so we rounded that up to 85 officers. That's just making some assumptions as far as what growth has done to the city over the past year. If you were to agree with how we come up with our workload figures it calls for service, it's roadway data, it's population, those are all the factors that go into this. Now, we went over that real fast and we just want you to reflect on what we showed you and that's why we gave you a handout. I'm sure you're going to have far more questions and we welcome those questions, but we wer en't going to get into an in-depth discussion today, because we are not making that request, we are just kind of showing you what the potential is out there. Now, for population, in the past there has always been several different places to look at. We have looked at census figures. We have looked at COMPASS figures. They were always just a little bit off. And now we have a third area that we are getting growth figures from . The City of Meridian had formed a growth committee that looks at the population and we have decided to use that -- those numbers. So, our message is consistent for every city department. So, there is -- are these COMPASS figures, are they census figures, are these our figures? Whose figures are they? Whatever the -- whatever the City of Meridian's growth committee is telling us the figures are that's what we are using. This is just an outlook, though, of -- of what that -- that guess is. The blue line is COMPASS growth. And, then, the purple line is the growth committee's projections -- current -- current estimates and projections for the future. One of the things that you have heard me speak to you about in the past is community service officer positions as a potentially more cost effective method to deal with some of the low level calls for service within the City of Meridian. I will tell you that our staff has looked at every single resource that we have available to us. They do an unbelievable job handling calls for service, but we do have appropriate positions that we haven't been able to fill Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 7 of 68 and the mission still has to go on and we still have to get those -- those calls answered. One of the fortunate things and why we are so safe is that we have very little violent crime, but we do have a lot of crimes of opportunities and those crimes of opportunities , these low level crimes, really affect the quality of life. Those are those crimes that really irritate each and every one of us and we want something done about it and so we can actually potentially hire some community service officers that would be able to do the work at a more cost effective rate than hiring more police officers. Also a little less training or less training time. Not as much equipment. Just has a whole bunch of different factors that could benefit the city. Now, we don't want to reduce our level of service . We want to increase our level of service at the -- at the most effective way that we can and these officers might be able to spend just a little bit more time dealing with -- with each individual, because the next call that's holding is a cold call and it doesn't matter if it waits another five or ten minutes, but the next call that's holding for that po lice officer could be an urgent or could be an emergency call and you can't give that time that -- that's needed to that -- to that person. Not to say that they don't do a darn good job , because they do, but oftentimes they have to rush off to the next ca ll and that person is going, oh, what just happened to me. One of the discussions that we had -- in fact, just yesterday was, you know, our TIP program, our trauma intervention program, would that be able to tie into or be available to a crime -- a crime -- a community service specialist. I was going to say crime prevention specialist. But community service specialist. And the answer is yes. And so they would be able to call in a TIP volunteer and deal with people that are traumatized by being a victim of crime. But one of the things that we did is -- is we tasked Lieutenant Colaianni to do is to research the other community service specialist positions within the valley and you have heard me mention before that Boise has one and Nampa has one. Well, Lieutenant Colaianni reached out to both of those departments to say, well, what types of calls do you allow your community service specialist to answer and this is the slide right here and on the left part of your slide is Boise and the types of calls that their community service specialists answer. Found property. Theft report. Follow- ups. Photo requests or photo cards. Graffiti. Vandalism. Fraud reports. Supplemental information. Crime scene investigator. And, then, in Nampa they let theirs do just a little bit more and you can just -- I don't need to read them off to you. You can read them off to the --the ones on the right-hand side are what they allow their -- their officers to do. The bottom line is is that you can allow them to do just about anything that you want up to having arrest powers or having to go to court to testify in a court trial or something. Usually if you find is there is suspects involved, then, you will have -- they will call in a patrol officer to deal with it. But up there on the top you can see where total calls for service in Nampa handled by a community service specialist, instead of a police officer, was 16 percent. Now, what we did is we looked at the types of calls that Meridian goes to and said, okay, if we were to do a community service specialist position, what's the potential that they have to reduce our calls for service and at what cost and here is an example of the last three years, in 2014, '15 and '16, the top of the page is the total calls for service that were generated by police officers and, then, underneath that in bold is the types of calls that a community service specialist would be able to respond to. Now, once you build that trust up and as long as you train them, you can train them up to different -- different calls. This is just an example for illustration purposes today. This is just a graph over the last three years to show the -- Meridian's calls for service that a community Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 8 of 68 service specialist might be able to handle. Bottom of the page lists the percent of calls for service that could be handled by a community service officer and not a police officer and, then, there is always that question, well, what does that really mean? How much cost savings would that be? And the key thing is to look at ways to be cost effective, to save money, but still give the same level, if not better level of service, and so what we have done is we just grabbed the salaries -- salaries only of a police officer -- first year police officer in Boise, Nampa and Meridian. That's the top line. And, then, these are actual figures of what Boise pays their first year community service officer. What Nampa pays the community service officer. And, then, we just merely rounded it up to 18 for discussion purposes. HR will make that determination, if we were to do something like this, what that salary would be, but that just gives you an idea of -- of potential savings that -- that we may be able to incur. Now, we covered a lot in a very short period of time, because we have a few other things that we want to cover with you . I know this was really, really quick and so this is just to wrap your mind around it and to start thinking about it, but if you do have any specific questions we will take those befo re we give the further presentation. I'd like to say the presentation is done, but the best is -- hasn't even started yet. Great. So, what I'm going to do is -- we got the time constraints and we are going to try to do the best that we can, but we have four additional people that I would like to have come up here and give a short -- a short presentation. So, if we could have Deputy Chief Basterrechea come up for this next part and that would be great. Thank you for your time. De Weerd: Thank you, chief. Basterrechea: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, so if you remember correctly, we came to you several months ago talking about being asked to be featured at the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference. They were going to create a video. They did that. Very pleased to say I think you will be very pleased with the outcome of it. This video played throughout the conference the entire time that we were there . It also played throughout the hotels of the attendees of the conferenc e throughout the time that we were there and we got very positive feedback from people who attended that conference. I will go into a little bit of that after we show you the video, but before we go any further, you know, we -- we talk a lot about the culture of the Meridian Police Department and how important that is to us as an organization and the importance of keeping that positive culture in how treat our employees and how our employees interact with the community that we serve and so you always wonder if a video will be able to capture that, but I think that after you see this you will see that they did an excellent job of catching what makes us different than a lot of other agencies. (Video played.) Basterrechea: So, where do we go from here? Now, one of the things that we talked about, of course, was the video is great, but what are you going to do with the video once it's done? One of the things that has come out of this is we did gain recognition from agencies that were in attendance at IACP. I had several of the chiefs and command staff talk to me about our video and talk to me about how do you change a culture in an agency Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 9 of 68 when -- when you get there and maybe it's not so good? And it's certainly not an overnight fix. We had the -- had those conversations with some of them and they even suggested that we possibly put together something to present at IACP, explaining coming into an agency or being in an agency and trying to figure out how to change the culture there to make it better than it is and so that's one of the things that I have been looking at doing is possibly putting together a presentation and sending it off to IACP to see if they would be willing to have us present. The other thing that certainly we think that we can do with this, as well as the other material that was given to us, because we have all of the uncut material as well, is working on more recruiting videos ourselves. While we were at IACP Lieutenant Caldwell did a great job, I wish he was here so he could speak to it, but he did a great job. He really focused on going to all of the presentations on recruiting and how do you go out and recruit people, especially in today's day and age where things are a lot different and we have got some great ideas for that. Some great ideas of using technology and social media to really go out and recruit. Because the way of policing recruits now doesn't work. I don't think that -- we are not getting the applicants that we want, because they are not out there. I think it's because we are not targeting them and we have got to catch up with the times and so we have looked at a lot of different ideas, using things like NIXL and Instagram and things like that to help us begin our recruiting and really start targeting people that we want in this profession and those people aren't always the people that are graduating from college that are 21 and 22 years old. We want some people with life experience and so one of the things that we have talked about with Lieutenant Harper and Lieutenant Ford and Lieutenant Brown, the other lieutenants, is how do we go out in the community and find those people working at jobs right now that really have a higher calling that they want to come to work for a police agency and maybe they have never thought about that. So, one of the things we are going to start working on is with our employees, with our officers, talking to them and explain to them the importance of them going out and finding people, where you recognize that service person at the restaurant and you would like to attend and you see that they have those qualities, why aren't we recruiting those people? Those are people within the community that understand our community values. Those are the people that we really should be going out there and looking for and recruiting. Getting laterals is great. We have hired some phenomenal laterals over the last couple of years, but the other pro blem you have is no matter how great those laterals are, they bring some different things from other agencies that maybe aren't so -- so positive and that can erode at your culture and we really want to protect what we have here and expand on making it bet ter and so those are the things that we are really focusing at. The last couple of things I will leave you with -- one of the great things about this -- we talk about celebrating our people's successes. Once they released this back at IACP -- we waited until they released it and, then, we sent it to the police department to have all of our officers see it and get to watch it and the positive comments I got back from was amazing. I instantly started getting e-mails back about how awesome the video was, how it really seemed to capture what we were about, because we have a hard time telling people about it, unless they are there and they are really experiencing it, our culture, and they really thought that they did a great job of capturing that through the interviews and the last thing is -- I will say this, we could have gone into the department and picked out anybody randomly and thrown them on this video -- it may have been a little different verb iage, but you would have got the same Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 10 of 68 message and that's really what makes us, I think, as a command staff more proud than anything. We know that the people we hire are great people and if we treat them accordingly, that's going to pass on to the community that they serve and that's what they do. I think all of you know that. You see it through the city surveys and you have all had interactions with our officers and they are here to serve and we are here to serve and we want to make sure that we are -- we are doing that for you, so with that I will stand for any questions that you may have. De Weerd: Any questions from Council? Bird: I have none. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: No questions. I would just like to say how pleased I am with the video. I was one of the supporters and just really excited to see what all we get to do with the video, because I think it's really great. And when Kaycee gets back and has an opportunity to work her magic with it I think we are going to see some really awesome things, so great job on it. Basterrechea: All right. De Weerd: Thank you. Basterrechea: Not that I don't want to listen to Lieutenant Colaianni, but my son has a wrestling match that I want to catch. Harper: Madam Mayor, Members of Council, thanks for having me today. I'm going to quickly talk about our school resource officer program, which I was fortunate to supervise for a number of years and as most of you guys know, I'm pretty passionate about what they do each and every day in our schools and in our community. A few things that I want to go over where we are at current day is we have nine officers and one supervisor that oversees those -- those nine school resource officers. We are serving over 30 campuses, four charter schools, and a number of private schools within our community. So, the number continues to grow, obviously, as we build more schools and have more private schools and charter schools come into our community. As always, I think our SRO program is by far premiere to what I have seen or experienced locally or even nationally. The men and women that are part of the school resource officer program really are about making a positive impact and making change with our young people and they really focus this through the education and prevention side of things where we work closely with MADC and our crime prevention folks, because I think in today's time with what we see and hear in our media and social media and newspapers, sometimes it's not the most positive and this really gives us an opportunity to represent ourselves, but also build those relationships and I guess change the way some people think of law enforcement, because Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 11 of 68 they get to -- get to know us and get to learn from us, so on and so forth. And what is it that they do? It's a laundry list as you see here. They do a lot of -- a lot of great things. A lot of programing. These men and women work long hours. They do whatever they can to interact with the youth, whether it's from the elementary schools up through high school, nights with parents, whatever we can to educate people in our community and maybe open their eyes to something they didn't know prior to walking into that -- that event. So, as you can see, we do -- we try to cover everything, because in society it's constantly changing with -- with trends of what's going on in our -- in our community and in our schools and what's affecting our young people and you can see here everything from internet safety to overcoming obstacles, alcohol education, drug education, bullying. We do a lot of stuff on driving as well as you know. We have a lot of young drivers out there and that's a learning experience for all of us . I will be in that position here in a couple years, so pray for me. Personal safety. Bike safety. Anything that we can do to educate and make sure that -- that they know what's going on and they can make good decisions or at least make a conscious decision when they are confronted with whatever that -- that issue may be that they are dealing with, because we have all been young once and those are challenges that we all faced at some point or another and not all of us were given these opportunities to have this education presented to us in our schools . Over many, many months we worked to try to -- I guess quantify or show it through statistics what impact the SROs are having within the schools and within the community. A total of 586 educational opportunities and prevention efforts were done by the SROs and we reached over 20,000 people within our community and it's only going to -- next year when this report comes out it will be even bigger and better. Some of the highlight ed events. The lockdown training. Obviously school safety is our number priority. We want our -- our schools to be, so the teachers and administrators have a safe environment to educate our future leaders and our future citizens of our community. Internet safety. Everybody's familiar with our internet safety program . We all know the dangers of the internet, social media, and this program has really opened the eyes to a lot of people, especially young people, but more than anybody parents, grandparents, teachers, because a lot of us are still learning about all the ins and outs of social media and apps and all that kind of s tuff. Sexting and pornography, which is something that some people are scared to talk about, but that dives right back into social media, the internet, and I think it's something good to talk about and the dangers that come with it. Alcohol education. Drug education. Life skills training. All these things are extremely important to developing these -- these young people into those productive members of society. Now, the target audience -- the numbers kind of -- you will look and you will see the elementary school at 7,500 kids. In that number comes our visits to the schools, so excuse the numbers a little bit, but over the last several years we have really worked to get the SROs more directly involved at the elementary school level. I think it's very important that they get used to seeing and learning about what a police officer is and what they do and, more importantly, to know that we are -- we are part of this community, we are fathers, we are sons or daughters and get to know us as people and I think that is huge as they move up into middle school and see us more regularly and just build those relationships . But, again, we really try to impact all parts of our community no matter the age, because I think it's a benefit to everyone. So, that's -- that's about it. That's a quick snapshot. We have a full report that -- I think that will starting coming out -- okay. You will have a full copy that gives a little Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 12 of 68 more comprehensive review of -- of all that we are doing and that's about all I got. I will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you, Lieutenant. Any questions? Thank you. Harper: Thank you. Colaianni: Thanks, chief. Madam Mayor, Council Members, I get to close tonight and I know we are a little over on time, so I'm going to go -- go through this pretty quick and -- the chief has handed out the first annual report on our outreach efforts in the community and typically I have Stephanie and Cheryl and Kendell come up and talk about themselves and all the work that they do, but for today's purposes I'm going to go ahead and just hit some high level stuff for what we have done in outreach in the last year and we hope to make this -- this report an annual thing, so we can really determine what our efforts are turning into, who are we in contact with and what kind of things we are doing out the community. Before I go there just really quickly. A lot of this information that you have on this PowerPoint and this presentation that you were just hand ed is done by almost exclusively two ladies and they are here and they don't get enough credit, so I want to have them stand up. Sarah Skimmyhorn and Beth Erickson, if you could stand up. These two ladies spend a large amount of time in putting these slides together, doing these stats, working on the staffing studies. This isn't my work, this is their work, and I want to recognize them for their efforts, because they are -- they are kind of behind the scenes and to -- to Sarah and Beth, they -- they like it that way. So, I want to talk to you a little bit about crime prevention. Again you have a larger report here, but this past year we were able to reach out and program 20,000 people in the community in various ways in events that we hosted or put on. We do department tours, neighborhood watches, Girl Scout vision, Mayor's Youth Advisory Council, and crime prevention presentations all throughout the community. Some of the top events that we put on are community block party, National Night Out, trunker treat, Spring Safety Fling, and, again, the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council. So, what we do is we put on these events and we estimate how much -- how many people are coming to our events, coming to our booths. We can use a clicker as we are making contacts with people. W e do follow up later on to bring these people into either our coalitions or our crime prevention to have them become part of our solutions in the community and our outreach efforts. And we are trying to measure as we go through year after year how we are doing, how do we know we are getting better and sometimes it's hard to measure, but some of the results we have seen is we have seen a lot more homeowners association meetings being requested by us. We have a lot more neighborhood watch groups that have signed on in their various communities as the cit y has grown and one of the things we are working on now -- or that Stephanie is working on now is we want to come up with a program and put together something that is going to engage our apartment complexes and those things that are coming in the pipeline as we approved a lot of those and they come into the city, we need to have some sort of program, some sort of way to outreach to those people living in apartments, town homes, and condos and so that's -- that's coming that way, too, but Stephanie, she's in Disneyland, she wishes she were here. Doing a tremendous job. She is operating at -- at darn near capacity, but, you know, we are doing everything we can to take on more Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 13 of 68 stuff. One thing that I have asked her to do is to increase our presence through prevention with youth. I think we can still leverage a lot more getting the youth to come into our crime prevention programs and kind of being the eyes and ears for us, too, and I think that's a good thing. Finally, MADC. Kendall -- Kendall is behind me, so she's probably grading me, so I will try and -- I will try and get this right. But more than a quarter of Meridian's total population 26,200, received prevention education through MADC. This education was presented at over 50 events in a one year span and much like crime prevention, we have really worked hard as Lieutenant Harper alluded to is trying to blend crime prevention, MADC and our SROs, NCOs and bring them all together and have a collaborative effort in the schools and in the community and I think we have done really well the last couple of years and we are just now trying to come up with additional strategies, additional things to measure how we are doing. Are we getting what we want out of it. An example would be as -- in this time we have disposed of prescription medications in the take back program. We -- we are constantly using evaluation processes both within the schools and in the community. Are we growing those areas. Are we getting stronger. And as you can see by this slide here we are. We are. That's just one -- one data from an evaluation measurement. Some of the strategies that we work on through our grant individually to provide information, build skills, provide support. Some of the environmental strategies that we have been using is change, incentives, and consequences, reduced barriers, enhance access, change physical design in the environment and modify policies and broader systems. If you have been around long enough with our -- with our grant that we have run through MADC, we have been able to do a tremendous amount of things, both in the schools and out in the community, and we have been really happy with the results. Moving forward, as the grant expires, you know, we have some opportunities to do a gap analysis and decide, you know, where are those areas we need to focus moving forward. Where are -- where are our holes at, you know. What do we need to do now. So, we are constantly weighing all those things to make sure as the city grows so does our programming, so does our outreach efforts. So, we have been very happy with it. Take a little bit of time to go through that. If you have questions and you want to meet one on one with Kendall or Stephanie or Cheryl or me for that matter, we would be glad to do that. There is a lot there. It's the first -- first year we have done this and I'm pretty happy with the way it turned out. So, more on that later. And I will stand for any questions you may have. De Weerd: Lieutenant Colaianni, I think it's important to note that the cohesion and the collaboration among the different services is -- is really impressive and it's starting to look seamless. That -- that's been great and Kendall sent out an e -mail either today or tomorrow or yesterday and she talked about the intangibles. We talk a lot about data and those numbers and the numbers do tell a story, but it's also the personal stories that come up after the program and that the touches and the follow up, note cards, and e -mails that you get from the public that talk about the impact that -- the presentations that you and your team are doing and that's phenomenal, that's the untold story, and so just our thanks for what you and your team are doing with this program to bring it to the next level and we had -- we were at a great level and you just showed that it can achieve much greater outreach and impact. So, thank you. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 14 of 68 Colaianni: Well, thank you for the kind words and I think -- I think when we come back in another year we will even have taken it a little bit further in, so I'm looking forward to the opportunities there, but it wouldn't happen without everybody's support in front of us. You guys support us with either the positions or the finances, the backing of what we are trying to do and what we are trying to achieve and I want to thank you al l for that, too. That means a lot and they do all the work. I can't take credit. De Weerd: But it's an environment and it goes back to something earlier that I think was -- maybe the chief or deputy chief talked about and it's attitude and it's cultu re and just seeing the SROs that go to the MADC meetings, they go because they want to, not because they have to. They want to know how they can get better tools and more information to do their jobs better. So, it's -- it's a new culture. It's an improved culture and it's noticed. Colaianni: Thank you. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: This -- this is getting my last report, so I get to take a little time here. You guys -- chief, you and your staff and all your officers, you have always made me very proud that we have you in Meridian. Your officers are first class and it all starts at the top and works down. I was very fortunate as a new councilman that I got to ride around with you and a dog quite a few times and I figured out real fast that our officers were a step above everybody else just the way they acted and the way they have treated people. Here is one elected official that -- thank you for making me look good for 20 years. Than k you very much. Lavey: Thank you. Madam Mayor and Councilman Bird, after last week's dedication for your park, which is well deserved, I had time to reflect a little bit, too, on the relationship you and I have for the last 20 years and I was going to save it for next month, but I recall the first evening that you rode with me, putting a Council Member in my car, it was not something I wanted and probably not something that Tico wanted and so our code run down to Garden City through the hectic traffic was probably enlightening for you. The end results was not what I -- I wanted and was trying to figure out how I could explain to my supervisor what happened. We won't go into great detail. But, then, I also recall at the old city hall when you and I talked about who is going to be the next chief here and some of the reflections that I had and some of the concerns that I had and some of the decisions that we were putting forth and so I have so many more stories than that, but we thank you for your service and I will save the rest for next month. This is a time for us to just kind of wrap up. I will tell you that we are slightly over, it's definitely my fault, which is not a surprise. But it's really hard to put a barrier around success and our departm ent has grown so much that trying to -- to come in front of you and explain everything that we have done this past year is impossible, so we have taken a snap shot and we hop e that that snap shot has enlightened you somewhat and if you have any further que stions now Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 15 of 68 or in the future or want to sit down and come in for a tour or pick our brains, we welcome you. So, with that being said I think it's time to -- to turn it over to the fire department, unless you have additional feedback or questions of us. Milam: Madam Mayor? Oh, sorry. De Weerd: Yes. Milam: Chief -- and to your whole team, wonderful job and the culture that you have -- the video turned out fantastic. When I watched that and I'm -- when I'm with any members of your department it makes me want to be a police officer. So, the recruiting factor is really there. Basterrechea: We have openings. Milam: It was never even a dream of mine. So, just the fact that it even runs through my head -- like I'm not really going to do it. However, it still makes me feel like that, because that is the culture that you guys have in the way that you treat people and members of the community and I have just a ton of respect for you all. Lavey: Thank you. We have openings. Milam: I think I'm aged out. Lavey: We will go for a run in two hours. De Weerd: Well -- and I know that there is a lot of moving parts in the police department from the detectives and records and patrol and our impact team and community service. There is -- there is a lot going on and you could probably consume the next several hours just talking about how decisions are made and the direction your department is going, but we hope that your message back to the entire department is one of appreciation and gratitude and that that film did capture the culture that -- that you and your team have been working hard at making sure it's not just talk, it's -- it's actually -- everyone's walking the walk and -- and we appreciate that. To Council I -- I know two of our members are -- were not able to be part of the presentation on the patrol staffing. We will bring this back. In the end we would like to see if we can solidify that level of service, have further discussions about a presence on the arterials, the collectors, and the local roads, so that we know as we plan that long-term staffing what we need to be focused on and , then, further discussions that will come up during the budget session on the community service specialist and -- and how that can be integrated into, again, a greater level of service in addressing our service -- our citizens' needs and how we can best serve them. So, thank you for your presentations today and -- and for all you do. Lavey: Thank you. Madam Mayor, I just -- I should follow with just the -- the one thing you just reminded me of that is that we -- our intent is to get approval of the methodology, not the actual numbers, and so if you approve how we do the methodology, that's what Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 16 of 68 we are looking for. Not that it means that you have to hire this many officers. Our plan also with talking to Beth is that each January they would, then, update the roadway data and the population data and calls for service data and it would have that information for the budget workshop, so we can fully engaged in the discussion each year on what we are going to do for staffing for the next year and so think you. De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Chief Niemeyer, I know you talk faster than Chief Lavey, so it should go faster. Niemeyer: I do and, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, it's funny, because Jeff and I have been doing this for a while now and we reminisce now that we have more gray hair about it's just no fun to poke fun at each ot her anymore. We used to do that quite a bit and it was fun. So, you kind of tee'd me up, I got a softball in front of me if I want it, but I just -- I can't take it and so we will move on. The information was great and I actually really was into everything that they were presenting, because a lot if it you will see here as well in some of the work we have done in fire and it really ties in to the collaborative work that we have also done with the police department. So, like Chief Lavey, the first part of my presentation deals with an issue that Councilman Borton and Councilman Cavener were very, very interested in, so we will catch up to them. But as you all recal l in 2016 this Council adopted turnout time and travel time standards. Performa nce benchmarks for the fire department. We have had about a year now to collect that data and analyze it and so we did want to present where we are at today. If you recall what you approved, it was a turnout time, which means the time that the bells go off in the fire station until the time we roll our wheels and get going -- EMS calls for 60 seconds or less 90 percent of the time and fire calls were 90 seconds or less than 90 percent of the time and, then, those travel time standards, we built those based on population densities. If you recall we had greater than 2,000 people per square mile. Our goal was five minutes or less 90 percent of the time and we had suburban densities which were 1,000 and 2,000 people per square mile, seven minutes or less 90 percent of the time and, then, those rural population is 50 to 1,000 people per square mile, nine minutes or less 90 percent of the time. So, let's take a look at where we are at. To give you a visual idea, the red is our urban metro densities, which makes sense, it's kind of the core of the city. Those yellow areas are suburban densities where we have those 1,000 and 2,000 people. And, then, the green is our rural areas and that certainly meets our comp plan and how we are growing as a city as well. So, it all makes sense there. So, prior to the evaluation that they -- I thought it was worth mentioning if you look at the left that's 12 months' worth of responses from November 1st, 2015, to November 1st, 2016. This is prior to when you adopted these standards. Really now sliding over to the right-hand side, this helps tell the story as well to some of the numbers you are going to see. So, for the period of 12 months, November 1st, 2016, to November 1st, 2017, we had 6,824 calls for service. That was a 16 percent increase over the previous year. That resulted in 8,820 unit responses over that previous year, which is -- which is an 18 percent increase and we saw a pretty significant jump in call volume over the previous year. We had 1,004 calls that were multiple apparatus responses, that made up 15 percent of our overall calls. Those are calls like structure fires, car wrecks that we have in which multiple apparatus need to respond for extrication or victimization stabilization. Five thousand se ven Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 17 of 68 hundred and thirty-two of those were emergent. That made up 84 percent of our call volume. And, then, you can see the breakdown there regarding EMS calls as compared to fire calls. Councilman Bird will appreciate this. We have had these discussions several times. What constitutes a fire call. There is a whole litany list of things that constitute a fire call. Everything from a full blown structure fire, apartment fire, commercial fire, down to smoke detectors tripping that we need to go check out and so it's a pretty broad paintbrush scope of what constitutes a fire when you -- when you evaluate this data. So, turnout times, EMS calls, our -- our one year performance was 92 seconds, 90 percent of the time. Again, our goal was -- was 60 seconds or less. And on our fire calls we are at 96 seconds 90 percent of the time. Our goal is 90 seconds. What we have found most departments are doing and we knew that there was maybe going to be some tweaks in these benchmarks as we continue to move forward, most departments have set one of standards for everything and it's 90 seconds. The EMS industry, including Ada County Paramedics, also has set a 90 second standard for all calls regardless and so that is something we will continue to look at and monitor and watch and report back on. De Weerd: So, chief, on the turnout times, this is the amount of time it takes to get out of the station. Niemeyer: Yeah. So, this is the bells go off, we get dressed, we get our turnout gear on, we get our equipment on, we get in the engine, we get the computer going and pushing route and, then, we roll the wheels. De Weerd: And -- and so what are you seeing some of the influencers of not meeting the 60 seconds or less? How are those being impacted? Is it that different crews or shifts do it different ways? Is there a standard turnout protocol? I don't know enough about fire to -- Niemeyer: There is. We have a standard turnout protocol, if you will, of here is what you do. We do have some dispatch CAD issues that sometimes affect this. This is another area that we are monitoring, watching and seeing if we can identify trends to see about improvement. The reality is what we are finding and what many fire departments have found is it takes about 90 seconds regardless of the call type to get out from where they are, whether they are out training, they are inside, where ever they are, to get out to the engine, get their stuff ready to go and, then, get moving. We find it's a pretty common standard across all call types. So, that's something we will continue to monitor. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I'm quite surprised that it's four seconds difference between a medical and a fire, because on the medical and they don't have to get into their turnouts. Niemeyer: Yeah. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 18 of 68 Bird: I think the -- I think the turnout times, like you said, they could be sitting down eating or they could be sitting there in study or whatever. I think that's -- I don't have no problems with turnout times. My biggest problem is -- is just, you know, making sure we can maintain it and stay there and don't fall off. Four seconds difference between fire and EMS is pretty dad gum good. They are jumping in the turnouts pretty fast. Niemeyer: They are moving pretty quick. Yeah. We are pretty pleased with it overall. Bird: A lot faster than I would. Niemeyer: A lot faster than I am, too. So, then, we go into travel time and this is something that's -- certainly sometimes it's challenging to mine this data, because of those different problems we work very closely with IT, they have been very helpful in helping us to get this information, so we can analyze it. So, our real travel time -- again, the goal was nine minutes 90 percent of the time. Right now we are achieving that 80.7 percent of the time. So, pretty close to the world -- real world. The suburban travel time, seven minutes 90 percent, our current performance is 66.7 percent of the time we are meeting that seven minutes or less. So, that's a little bit concerning. It does make some sense. Those suburban areas are a little bit further out from our primary stations. It takes longer to get there. We know we have some traffic. The urban metro is what initially caught me off guard and I thought, uh oh, we are -- we are in trouble here. The goal is five minutes 90 percent of the time and we are meeting that goal 38.1 percent. So, my initial thought was why. Chief Butterfield and I worked on this, along with IT. It's interesting, because if you take the average response time to those emergent calls, our average is five minutes and 16 seconds for everything in our district on an emergent call. So, what that tells me is, again, fractals like this -- we are talking about fractals, it's kind of all or none. You know, either you were five minutes or less or you weren't. So, that tells me a lot of our calls we were at five minutes and 20 seconds, five minutes and 30 seconds, five minutes and 40 seconds. So, we are looking into this further to identify really where are we at at 90 percent. Is it five minutes and 40 seconds? Is it five minutes and 50 seconds? So, we can report back exactly where we are at at the 90th percentile. I'm not as concerned after I realized what our average was at five minutes and 16 seconds district wide. We do know we have some factors including road congestion, we have redundant calls or reliability issues. You saw that multiple calls that we had throughout that previous 12 months. That affects this travel time. So, this is an area that we are definitely going to keep an eye on and we will report back to you as we continue to monitor it. So, again, what we have learned, multiple calls, multiple unit responses, they are affecting some travel times in the urban metro core. We anticipate Station 6 will provide some relief to this. We are going to continue to study it, report and monitor on the individual station reliability. We have talked about reliability here. In other words, how often can that engine in that station handle a call within that subdistrict and, then, report on that level one zero -- zero, one, and two readiness. Basically, that just means how often do we get down to only two engines in the city and how often do we get down to only one engine in the city and how often are we completely out of apparatus for a period of time. So, we will continue to monitor that. The shoot time standard again I mentioned. It may be worth considering as we move forward, just having one standard for all calls, but we will continue Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 19 of 68 to monitor that and discuss that with Council as we move forward. So, other areas of focus that we had for FY-17, the previous year, continue leadership development through our officer development program. We have talked about that before. The benefit here is -- the thing I want to stress is that we had the highest turnout this year than we have ever had in the four years previous. So, we not only had up and coming officers going through our -- our officer development program, but we had existing officers coming to some of those classes to improve their education. And so that was a big plus for us. That tells us that this program is working, the message is out, and it's a benefit to the department and the leadership development of our company officers. We did conduct again another joint labor management retreat. Now, the topics we covered were squad ARVs working out of class, carcinogen exposure, wildland firefighting, and the annual training plan. I will report on that a little bit later here. We did develop an EMS task force. The question has arisen from time to time where is the future of our EMS program. Where are we going with it? This task force was developed -- we developed an agreed upon data points that we are going to analyze over a two year period to, then, come back, make better decisions and, then, report to you as Council and Mayor on where we think our EMS program should go and I think that's going to be very beneficial. The other thing we have talked about doing is -- I appreciate the conversation that Chief Lavey had about culture. We developed fire ground company performance standards about three years ago. Those were rolled out to the crews. They were educated on, they were trained on, and this last year we tested on them. We said we have had them out long enough, let's test on them and see how proficient we are. We believe professionalism, which is one of our core values, is demonstrated by how well we do something when we get to the call that the people called us to. So, I'm happy to report everybody passed those company performance standards. We actually had competitions going on between shifts and crews. We had crews that really did well and they were still upset with themselves that they didn't do better. So, that tells us that that training that we have been doing works and it pays off. So, we are very pleased with that and that will continue moving forward . Access. The Ada County EMS JPA, otherwise known as Ada County City Emergency Services System. This is not ACEM. I know we get the acronyms kind of mixed up a little bit. The big -- the big sell there, the big plus that we did this year was Pulse Point. We have talked about that before. It simply gives me another opportunity on the record to push Pulse Point and to encourage not only you, but our citizens to download that Pulse Point app. If you're trained in CPR and you're near a cardiac arrest, you're going to get a notification. So, you are an extension of us. You are a first responder. And if we work together on that we can actually improve cardiac arrest survivability. So, very big deal for us. I happened to miss the meeting where they elected the new officers, so I am once again the chairman of the JPA committee. So, we have a -- we have a plan moving forward for this year to look at everything we have done, make sure it's still working. It's kind of a moment to pause, reflect, if all the things we push for are actually still working. I will say this. At the last board meeting I attended there was some very positive comments made by some of the elected officials in attendance. A Boise council woman who sits on this -- on this board articulated from the Boise city council how pleased they are with where we are at today, as compared to where we were at five years ago. Commissioner Case echoed those same things. So, that actually was done across the room. This tells me, again, this is working. That this collaboration is working and it's better than what we had years ago Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 20 of 68 and we are going to continue to move that forward. Again I want to talk about a collaboration with -- with the police department. That's the public safety academy and the public safety day. Again, these were two very successful endeavors and it seems like it gets better every year. We get higher attendance every year. I can also share with you -- I was on a conference call with a group of fire chiefs in Santa Clara county , that's San Jose and that whole area there, they were asking me a question about one of our programs and we started talking relationships with law enforcement and they had read some of our annual report and our website and they said, chief, what have you done to do this joint stuff with PD. We notice you have AEDs on your rig. Is there an extension of -- of what you're doing. You're partners in crime with -- literally with this. You have a public safety day. You have a public safety academy. How did you do this? The easy answer could have been, well, the Mayor directed us as chiefs that we will do this. but, really, my comment to him is all -- it's all about relationship building with your -- with your agencies that you work with and I think that's why we are so successful here. We build relationships. We are not fighting one another for money. We are actually helping one another develop programs to serve the community. We are not offended that they have AEDs in their rigs. That doesn't offend us. That's not our turf. We love the fact they have AEDs in their rigs. Someday they might give us guns. That would be great. But if not we will keep moving forward. Jeff's not -- yeah. I know. He didn't -- he checked out. So, that's another really positive this year. Our customer feedback program -- I mentioned that last time we were here, but that's worth mentioning aga in. We did develop that. It took a year to develop and we are very pleased with that, because the feedback we are getting is really good and we are getting a lot more feedback than we thought we would. These are cards that we handed out. We send them out once a month. They are mailers. We thought we will be lucky if we get ten percent back. Our return rate has been very high. What we are hearing from our customers that we serve and our citizens is that 88 percent of them rated us as exceeding their expectations. Eleven percent say we met their expectations. And one percent, two people, said, you know what, I'm not too happy. I can tell you what those two were. One was you didn't get there quick enough and I will tell you when you call 911 -- I have been in this situation before. You call 911 and you got something happening in front of you, you feel like it is forever before anybody gets there. The call that she was referencing I did look up. We got there in five minutes and ten seconds, which was pretty dang good considering where we were coming from. It just felt like forever to her. But the other one that we had was a structure fire in which we responded with the Boise Fire Department. One of the crews ended up breaking down a door not in the fire area and we found out that wasn't our crew, so I was able to kind of pass them on to the -- to the Boise chief, which was kind of fun to do. So, those were our two that -- that had some concerns. And this is where you can find the information. You will notice over on the left-hand side we have a comments feedback section that will take you to the -- to the shortcuts for those surveys. Over on the right-hand side right above the Facebook deal, we have a comments feedback page and, then, we also have an ask the chief button and believe it or not, we get anywhere from three to five of those a month, where people will submit a question to me and just -- they have a random question. Sometimes it's about hiring. Sometimes it's about public outreach. Sometimes it's about smoke detectors. It just varies. But that is a pretty active avenue for us. That's a good way for us to engage with the community. FY-18 budget. Moving into that. Council Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 21 of 68 approved two fire engines. We thank you. Inspection quote got completed. The purchasing department is in the final process of that. That should be coming to you as Council November 21st to approve the contract. I will tell you that the initial bid was higher than what was budgeted. Chief Jones and I met -- this is Deputy Chief Jones' project and we both agree they are going to have to sharpen their pencils or we are going elsewhere and so we went back to Pierce and they sharpened their pencils. So, we got that done. Station 6 -- I have a whole presentation later that I think is going to answer a ton of questions, so I'm going to be very brief here. Just to mention for you as Council the RFQ for architects has been completed. It's been posted. We are going to be engaging an architect in the next couple of weeks. And active right now is the RFQ for the CMG -- the construction manager general contractor. That list will be established and, then, we will put those two folks together and move forward with floor plans. And, again, a lot more to come in another presentation on Station 6. FY-18 budget continue real quick. AED request. First order has been completed. Those will be ordered in the next two weeks. This was to wrap up the Heart Safe Meridian program and get the rest of the AEDs out into -- I believe the police cars, if I'm remembering right. I think we got Parks done. Our replacement of MFO. That's been ordered and that's the surplus rig is going option. The replacement of the extrication equipment -- the first order has been completed for that. And, then, replacement of fitness equipment, that's going to be put out to bid. We have not yet opened that, but we anticipate a closing December 4th. But I also wanted to hit on -- Councilman Milam, to your point, I really appreciate your feedback on this. Are we going to train the crews? Are we going to educate the crews? Are we going to continue to coach the crews? So, at this point so far all of our -- all of our crews, including the recruits, have received two hours of training and education and coaching on the fitness program, with ongoing training plans. So, we have started that process and we will continue to maintain that process. So, I appreciated that. That was good feedback for us and certainly our -- our folks heard it, too, so we are moving forward with that. Current work in progress or process. Fiber connectivity to the fire stations. That is an issue that we are facing. We are working with IT, the Police Department, and the Mayor fo r solutions. I just want to say something on that. Fiber connectivity does not affect our 911 responses, but it greatly affects our operational issues when we come back and need to write reports and get those done in a timely manner. Our EMS reports we have to get done within a certain time frame and get us to the hospital for the ER docs to review, so that connectivity is a very big deal for us moving forward and so that's an issue that I know is out there. Carcinogen reduction program. I mentioned this, because this is something that hopefully the administration and the firefighters are both interested in working together on and that is to reduce carcinogen exposure to our firefighters. We know the data that's out there, we know the science, and it's undisputable. Firefighters have a higher risk of cancer exposure and a higher risk of cancer due to the exposures. So, what does that mean? We know that means we need to look at our vehicle emissions testing. Diesel exhaust is a carcinogen. We have engaged with a firm here locally, a lab, to come out and do some emissions testing. I mention that, because if we find that our current systems are not working properly, we are going to be looking for what do we need to put in the stations to protect our firefighters with regards to vehicle emissions. We also have a speaker coming in from Washington state on December 11th to talk about health and healthy initiatives. Fire ground things we can do at low cost to protect our firefighters Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 22 of 68 better. So, that is coming. That's a good joint effort between us and the firefighters. Public safety community outreach. That's another thing that's in process. Working with the Mayor and Police Department, just to look at those at risk groups and how do we reach out and how do we identify what their needs are, that we may not be hearing today, so I think that's a great -- great effort on the part of the Mayor and the Police Department and the Fire Department. Real quick. Recruit academy. Twelve entered, 11 remain. They graduate this Friday. That -- that graduation ceremony is at Mountain View High School in the auditorium at 6:00 p.m. Come if you can. We have folks throughout the valley in an honor guard academy right now. It's actually being held over at the training center and this is going to be their first event that they are going to be rolling out their honor guard and what they -- what they do with that. So, we are pretty excited about that. Once they complete that graduation they will have another fo ur weeks with us to complete some EMS training and car seat technician certification, et cetera, and, then, they will get out for their FTO time. So, we anticipate them to be available for shift vacancy coverage beginning in April. That will be the time that they get done with all their field training officer. Lateral hire testing. I will mention this briefly. We do have three vacancies outside of total recruits that we hire. We are in the process of interviewing those for consideration to hire. Those folks will come in, do some minimum competency testing. They are already firefighters. There was a requirement to have three years of service as a firefighter already. Again, those folks, once they get through everything, will be available in April as well. So, we will be back to full staffing there. Other current work in process. You're going to hear from Chief Bongiorno in the near future on the fire code adoption. The fire code is always an interesting, fun, topic. A lot of people don't like it. We get it. We understand it. But it really was developed through tragedies across the country. That's how these things happen. So, when you have this super sofa store fire in Charleston, South Carolina, that killed nine firefighters, you had a night club issue in New Hampshire, Rhode Island that killed a hundred people. The bodies were stacked four feet high, because there wasn't enough doors to get out of that -- that building. That's why the fire code is what it is. We look at it from the standpoint of it's a guide for us to help developers and help business owners keep their businesses safe, but we work with people to try and find solutions. That's the goal. Now, very few times do we need to take a hard stance on anything. The two important issues for us and that are important for you coming up are -- are access and water supply issues. Those are the two biggest things that we have. Challenges. We can get to the fire and when we get there do we have enough water to put it out. That's really where we are at. So, I mention this, because it will be coming to you. We are working with city staff, with other fire departments on that water supply issue to see if we can't standardize that across the valley. How nice would that be? Because everybody does it a little bit differently. That doesn't make us look good. That just pits one city against another city against another district and so we are hoping to find a way to standardize that, so it's the same across the entire Treasure Valley. Strategic plan objectives. To review those real quick, we have 3-C-1, that's the incident management team. That's 80 percent complete. We are recommending using internal staff for smaller scale events, like Snowmageddon, like we did last year, and if we do have a significant event, like an earthquake, we utilize the state type three incident management team. I could probably go on for about an hour on IMT. I won't. Needless to say, if we have an incident like an earthquake, everybody in this room that's part of a Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 23 of 68 department is going to be busy out there. That leaves nobody left to manage the incident long term. We are talking 72 hours to two weeks that we would need help in that situation. We have identified the help. I think that's the best way to go moving forward. Forty-one is a safety profile. Chief Lavey mentioned on that a little bit as well. We are reviewing that, looking at risks and how can we identify those risks, both now and in the future and, then, develop programs that meet the risk. So, we get that -- that safety rating that we want. And, then, 41 is the health profile. That was just initiated. I reached out to Kindra from Blue Cross, she just e-mailed me back today. She was out of town. We are going to be meeting to talk about partnerships and how can we -- how can we promote health in Meridian and what does that look like and we will be bringing that back to Council with an update. Snowmageddon version two update just real quick. We have heard that it's either going to be another terrific snow year or a none snow year. We don't know what. So, either Frosty's coming or not. So, if it does we will be prepared. Planning group has met twice in preparation. Rolls and responsibilities have been identified. Mr. Colaianni is our incident commander all the time. He's going to be the full time IC. Did he leave? Okay. We got that approved. We did learn some lessons from last year that are going to be applied to this year in the event that we have a snow event as well, identifying the communications with the community, response partners, volunteer group, coordination, et cetera. We are going to meet again about two to three weeks to do a table top, just to see how prepared we are to handle this event. I think last year we did really well on the fly, but we learned some things and we will make it even better if it does happen. Upcoming issues. Challenges. Fiber connectivity. I mentioned that. We are approaching the tipping point. We are watching this pretty close and Todd has done a great job of getting data out and getting information out about projected growth and what does it look like. We do know there is a point -- it looks like in 2021 where we see a projection of a pretty big spike in population. Don't know why. Just a projection. But fire departments that we have talked to said when that happened to us -- when we had that one year anomaly where all of a sudden it really jumped up, we weren't ready for the call volume that followed. So, don't know if it will happen here or not, but we are watching that and communicating with -- with Todd and the directors about this issue. Dispatch. Just kind of an issue and challenge. Cost of service versus level of service. We do pay for dispatch. We don't have a contract with dispatch. It's something we are continuing to work on with the sheriff, developing those levels of service. We do have some issues that crop up from time to time on delayed notifications to us, especially when you have three dispatch centers in the valley and depending on where you are with your cell phone it may hit one tower and go there or it may hit the same tower and go there and so we have some issues there that we have got to work out. Contract negotiations are coming up. We have multiple projected retirements. This is something that -- that I put a working group together, we have met twice, to understand and identify -- we have potentially six retirements in FY-18 and we know what a vacancy does to overtime and so ther e is this correlation of folks retiring and are we ready to handle that. The nice thing is we do have some extra folks for a little while that would help with that . But a lot of these retirees are either the battalion chief level or captain level or an engineer level and so we do have some promotional stuff we are going to have to do pretty quick to -- to meet that demand. And, then, the capacity of inspectors as commercial development grows. So, with that I Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 24 of 68 tried to stay within the short time frame to keep the Council meeting going. Certainly happy to stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you, chief. Council, any questions? Well, we will be hearing from you again here soon. Niemeyer: Yeah. De Weerd: So, thank you for being here. Thank you, Charlie, for -- for what you do and, please, tell your staff as well, we appreciate what they do and I appreciate being able to go to some of the meetings I go to and talk about how our public safety is -- is almost seamless and how -- and it's not just the front line staff members, it goes all the way from top to bottom. So, to you, chief, and Chief Lavey, thank you. That's true leadership. So, thank you. Niemeyer: You're welcome. B. Finance: Quarterly Update De Weerd: Thank you. Our next item is under our Finance Department and I will turn this over to our CFO Todd Lavoie. Lavoie: Good evening, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Again, I get the fun task of following Public Safety again. It's finance. It's not super exciting, but I will do the best I can to keep you engaged. I know -- I think I stand between you and dinner, so let's see what we can do here. Tonight we are going to do our quarterly update for you guys. Today we are going to go over property tax calculation. A lot of this might be repetitive to you from 12 months ago. I think it's good information to share with you. We are going to look at the current property tax levy rate and the history. We are going to look at property tax comparisons. We are going to give you an update on our current property tax burden. Where is our revenue property tax coming from and we are going to do a quick property tax levy comparison between the City of Meridian and other cities in the state of Idaho. And, then, we will give you a sneak peek of what we will be presenting to you at the next quarterly meeting and, then, as always, we will stand for any questions and answer any that we can find for you or research any projects that you have for us. So, with that property tax 101. Again the state, the county, they mandate how we calculate property taxes, how we collect property taxes. These are just two quick codes that I like to reference for you and the citizens and our team members in regards to how we collect property taxes. The blue font is where I kind of want you to focus. The first one states that the city does have the opportunity to increase our property taxes up to three percent based on the three previous years from property taxes and, then, the second code references were the county informs the cities of the new annexation and the new construction revenues that they will be able to collect for the upcoming calendar year. Again, code that dictates how we collect and how we recognize revenues for the city. So, with that property tax 101 calculation. The first part of a property taxation calculation -- again, there is four parts of this. If you remember from last year, the first one is called Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 25 of 68 base property taxes. The base property taxes are determined by the highest approved certified amount of taxes levied in the past three years. So, that is kind of a fixed number, whatever the number -- the highest number was from the previous three years, that would be known as your base property tax for the upcoming year. Again, another way to look at base property taxes -- this is the amount of revenues that we as a Council and the city has determined is enough revenue to cover the base services, the level -- not the level of service, but the services that we have agreed to provide our citizens and our community. So, that's what we call our base revenue. If all things stood still, no more growth, no more development. Healthcare doesn't go up, costs don't go up, in theory our base property taxes would stay flat, because everything else would stay flat. I think we all know that we are growing. Healthcare is not staying flat. So, therefore, the state does offer us opportunities to help recover those revenue sources to cover the se increased costs and those are in the next three components of the property tax revenue calculation and we talked about the three percent allowable. The three percent allowable as I presented it in the past to you is what I kind of consider the cost of doing business factor. Again, if all things stayed static, no more growth, no more development, but healthcare increases occurred, fuel costs increases incurred, wage cost increases occurred, how would we pay for those? Well, the state gives us this opportunity to request more revenue sources to pay for those offsetting expenses, because as we explained, the base property expenses cover what we determined was acceptable in the previous year for the services that we are going to provide. So, again, that's only if things stayed the same. Now, we both know -- we all know that things don't stay the same, so we need some additional revenues to cover the additional costs if they occur and this is an opportunity for the city to take advantage of and in the years past we have taken it and we have not taken it and we will go over the history of that. Next component of the property tax calculation is new construction. This is controlled by Ada county. They inform us of the new construction that's occurring here at the city. Again, we have seen lots of new construction here at the city. Unfortunately or fortunate, which way you want to look at it, the forecast shows that there is more growth coming, guys. So, there is going to be more new construction revenues that will be added to our revenue stream , but those items are items that we would like for you to kind of consider and think of as growth items. So, the revenues generated from the new construction and annexation, those are incurred because new growth has arrived here and we have approved it and now we are seeing it. We would like to kind of focus those revenue sources as growth -- new growth to help the Police Department add boots on the ground, to help the Fire Department add boots on the ground, to help the Parks Department add parks maintenance facility members and those are needed because of the new growth incurred by the new construction and annexation. Obviously, if we had no new construction and no new annexation, an argument could be made we might not need new boots on the ground , because we have the same set of boots on the ground, with the same set of population from previous years. So, again, the state has allowed us a couple of different mechanisms to account for our base needs, base services. The state has allowed us now a three percent allowable to consider cost of doing business and, then, the last two items are for what I consider growth-related items that we need to consider as growth continues to increase here at the City of Meridian. So, that's properly tax 101 calculation. That is mandated kind of by the state and the county. So, with that I'm going to show you our base property taxes that we have Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 26 of 68 collected over -- since 2005. Yes, the base property taxes have increased, but so has population, so has the community and so have the services that we provide to the citizens. The next item as we explained in our calculation are the allowable taxes. This is the allowable taxes that we can increase our base property taxes up to three percent and you can see in fiscal years 2011 and 2012 we did not take any of the three percent. In 2017 we only took two percent. In all of other years represented on this graph we took the three -- the full three percent allowable for those particular fiscal years. This is the new construction increase in revenue from Ada county. They informed us of this dollar value. Again, you can see during the great recession the revenue sources did go down, because of the lull and the slow down in the construction. And, then, the thing with annexation. We had a lot of annexation in the earlier years, which slowed down on the annexation over the last few years, but, again, this all depicts the city is growing. All the annexation is going to have development and we see that coming now and when you put all these graphs together, you can see that the base property taxes make up the majority of our revenue source, with a few extra dollars from the annexation, three percent, and the new construction. So, with that I just want to do a quick reminder on property tax revenue sources for the General Fund. As you can see on this graph, 62 percent, that is the amount -- or that's the percentage of revenue we generate in property taxes for the entire General Fund as a percentage. So, it's a major component of our revenue source for the entire General Fund and if we added that, plus the intergovernmental, which is state revenue sharing, their liquor license, liquor sales, and so forth, that's 80 percent. So, those two alone make up 80 percent of our entire revenue source. Again, we don't have many mechanisms to counter the property tax reductions, if there were any or any issues of property taxes. Sixty-two percent is a large portion of our revenue source and we have to make sure we manage that revenue source cautiously. It's not only for today's Council and citizens, it's for tomorrow's Council and citizens. So, again, just want to reiterate we need to manage that piece of the pie -- I guess pun intended here. This piece of the pie for this graph, we need a manage it professionally and successfully for -- not today, but also for tomorrow. So, property tax levy rate history. A few days ago I sent out an e-mail to you and the rest of the city staff that we received our levy rate for the next coming year and great news for the city and the citizens and the levy rate -- the rate went down again for the third, fourth consecutive year. So, again, fantastic news from a levy rate standpoint. You can see it's gone up. It's gone down. But right now we have been on a consistent downward swing, which is awesome for our citizens and our community. Another component of the levy rate, though, is what is called our taxable value here at the city. This is a cumulative value that the Ada county has determined that the city has on top of the ground, buildings, construction, housing, you know, hospitals, whatnot, they value the City of Meridian currently at 8.27 billion dollars. So, you can see growth is occurring. You can see the values there. The great recession we had a little bit of a down swing, but since, then, we have been growing pretty strong. You guys know the plats have been coming in. There is plenty of growth ahead of us, so we feel that this number will continue to grow and if you put the two graphs on top of each other, it's more of an FYI. It may be counter intuitive, but it's an inverse relationship. As the property tax value or property value by Ada county goes up -- in this case 8.27 billion was the last number we showed you. The levy rate goes down. It's an inverse relationship. I know it might not be super intuitive. But, again, I will try to explain some of this in the next few slides. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 27 of 68 So, what you can see as the value is going up for the city, the levy rate is going down. Both positives at the end of the day for the citizens of the city and the community. As you look at this, just a reminder. In fiscal year 2011 and 2012 we did not take the three percent property tax allowable, but you can see what happened to the levy rate. They both went up. If you recall the last three, four years we have taken either two percent or three percent and the levy rate has gone down. So, again, it's counter intuitive, but, again, just want to remind you our decisions on the allowable three percent property tax does not have the ultimate outcome that you think it's going to. The Ada county property value has a much larger influence on what happens to the levy rate than what we decide here at the city on whether or not we should increase property taxes three percent or not. So, again, just want to point out that, you know, you would -- you would think the property tax levy rate would go down if you don't take the property tax increase, but, instead, it went up the last three years you have taken it and levy rate has gone down. So, again, just a little FYI. It's not always as intuitive as you think it is. So, I'm going to take you back to a little bit of calculation 101. You saw the components. This is how Ada county determines our levy rate for us. They do all the work for us, we just submit the information. They ask us for our total property taxes that we need for the upcoming fiscal year and that's the -- one piece of the equation. The next part of the equation is that property tax value. That's the 8.2 billion dollars. You take one divided into the other, that's what we get as a levy rate. So, that is how the levy rate is actually calculated. We inform the county how many dollars we need in property taxes. They tell us our property value. You divide one into two and you actually get a levy rate. So, again, this is a more visual concept. You can see the formula up there on the top right-hand corner. I showed you this slide earlier. This is our total property tax request for fiscal '18, a little over 30.6 billion -- billion. Wow. Thirty point six million dollars. Not yet. The 8.27 billion dollar value, those are the two components, and if you put those components together in the formula you will see that it comes out to the levy rate of .37, which is lower than last year, which is awesome, which I know Councilman Bird is very happy to see. So, with that, that is how levy rates are calculated. Those are the components of the levy rates. Now, the question you guys ask me sometimes is what does that mean to the house, what does that mean to the taxpayer. Every year I present to you these slides. So, here we go. These are the six houses that we show you every single year. Five of the six houses property values -- actually, all six houses all went up for fiscal year '18 according to Ada county. They do the assessments for us. We don't. Again, just a reminder, in fiscal year 2011 and '12 we did not take the property tax -- allowable property taxes, so with that the shaded area is the average amongst the six houses, just for comparison reasons. I know this is a question that you're asking what are the property taxes looking like. Again, this is per Ada county. Five of the six houses will see an increase in their property taxes . One house is actually going to see a reduction in their property taxes. So, whose ever house that is, congratulations. But the other five houses will see an increase in property taxes. The north Meridian house will see the most in our comparative analysis. Their house it almost went up 20 percent in value. So, again, that's a good thing for the homeowner. Their value went up 20 percent. But, unfortunately, the property taxes went up, but it did not go up in a comparative 20 percent rate, I can promise you that. If you look at this value, the total average change in market value for the homes in this comparison were 9.02 percent, but the average increase in property taxes was 6.85. So, just because you can't correlate Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 28 of 68 the increase of value to taxes, they don't correlate one to one due to exemptions that the state has -- can provide you and so forth. So, again, we needed to consider when we were discussing the property tax allowable three percent, it doesn't always have a direct impact on increased property taxes. In this example we have one house that's going to see a reduction in property taxes, but yet we here at the city increased property taxes quote, unquote, three percent. We can see in 2011 -- '10, '11, '12, we did not take them, but some people actually saw an increase in property taxes and, then, there is one house, south Meridian, for the years '14, '15 and '16, they paid less taxes year over year over year, but yet we increased property taxes year over year over year. So, again, the influence is more on the side of Ada county. So, with that the property tax burden, part of the presentation, this shows where our property taxes are coming from . I don't think it's a surprise to you, the majority of it is from residential. The second largest portion is commercial. I think the next graph will kind of show you a better slide of a percentage. Again, this is back to 2016. We have not received the information for '17 yet. The calendar year is still out. But, again, this for '16's property taxes generated for the City of Meridian and this kind of shows you from a percentage we are generating about 64 percent of our revenue from residential and 30 percent from our commercial and it's been pretty static for the last number of years and you guys see the plats, you approve the plats, you know that we are doing more residential, so this number should stay pretty strong there. So, with that this is a comparative analysis that we do here at the city. We work with the AIC data that they provide all the cities in the state. This is a comparison of City of Meridian to the other cities that we have picked here for their general fund levies. Many cities have other levy rates. Road levies. Parks levies. Police -- public safety levies. Airport levies. We tried to just compare the general fund levy to the general fund levy amongst the cities and as you can see for the second largest city in the state we are the fourth lowest in this comparison and, again, just to say we are a full service city -- I would say yes, too. We provide many services for a -- I guess a pretty low value in compare -- comparison to Nampa, Boise, Caldwell, Pocatello, Mountain Home. I think this is a kudos to you, Mayor and to the Council and to all your departments, they do stretch the dollar as far as they can. You heard from public safety just a second ago. They do as much as they can with what we provide them . You can see that we don't have the largest levy rate. Our levy rate went down again. Third year in a row. If things continue to go as they are, I imagine our levy rate will continue to go down again next year, which is awesome, but, then, we still do have to ask the question should the -- should the second largest city in the state, with the number of services that we provide, should we be the fourth lowest levy rate in the entire state. That's a valid question. It's just food for thought. It's -- again, we always have to kind of have it on the whiteboard, you know, do we need to look at increasing the levy rate at some point in time in the future to make sure that the citizens receive the services that they need. Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 29 of 68 Palmer: Todd, so wouldn't there be a correlation, though, to the fact that we don't need necessarily a higher levy rate because of the higher property values in Meridian compared to these other cities? Lavoie: The correlation -- I don't think you could do a one for one, because every city is going to be different with the services that they provide. Again, you're a full service city - - in my opinion you're a full service city. You have fire, police, you have parks, you have public safety, you have other government, you have community development. To say that Mountain Home has all those, I would say I don't believe they do. Again, you guys can confirm that. So, it's services -- the services relationship. So, I don't think you can just say one for one, if that's what you're trying to do. I don't think you can make that simple -- simple assumption. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: I guess what I'm trying to say is that -- that Meridian have a levy rate of .0037 is going to net more on an average per household tax -- property tax than what I would assume would come out of Mountain Home at the higher levy rate. If Mountain Home's levy rate was the same as ours we are going to net significantly more, because of much higher home values of Meridian's homes compared to the average home value of Mountain Home. Lavoie: It's a valid question. I'd have to inquire about the average house cost in Mountain Home. But we can look at our neighbor Boise. I think their average house cost is higher than ours. I think. So, you can see on this levy right here they are twice as much as us. So, your argument would be they would actually generate twice as much revenue for the same services here in Boise -- or Meridian. So, I mean to be able to assume that simple correlation I think we would have to tread lightly, because just next door their levy rate is .7 and their house value might be at our level or even higher. I would have to doublecheck that. But we are making that assumption. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: And I think that -- that would be a better comparison to -- to the point you made of -- of our level of responsibility compared to the reckless behavior of our neighbor. There is a million examples where we can go with that. But I think just it's important to say it's not that we are undercharging our citizens because of the level of service that we are providing, it's -- it's that our home values are higher, so we -- while the -- the levy rate may appear to be half of -- of Mountain Home, Pocatello, Caldwell, the number of dollars per property that our citizens are paying is not half. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 30 of 68 Lavoie: Mr. Palmer, again, levy rates are based on 100,000 dollars value. So, if you have a 100,000 dollar home in Mountain Home and you have 100,000 dollar value in City of Meridian, you're going to pay 370 dollars a year in Meridian and you're going to pay 895 dollars in Mountain Home if you have the same 100,000 dollar home. Again, my guess is there is 100,000 dollar home in Meridian and it's probably a 100,000 dollar home in Mountain Home, so the question, then, goes back to the discussion, should that same person pay 890 dollars in Mountain Home or should they pay 370 dollars in the City of Meridian for the services. Very good discussion points. I mean I think it's great, your question. But, again, it does beg the -- you know, deeper in-depth analysis on where we want to go with that discussion. Palmer: Thanks. Lavoie: So, with that -- again, this is going to recap where we have gone. Talked about the calculation and how we get there. What Ada county does for us and how they calculate the numbers. We showed the comparison. We showed the burden of property taxes between residential and commercial and we just had a quick comparison between us and other cities and, then, with that this is our next quarterly update, so we will show you in a few more months, we will give you an update on our actual financials . We will give you changes to our fund balance, so we will let you know where we currently stand on our fund balance for the General Fund and the Enterprise Fund. We will give you revenue expense ratios, so what we try to do is we prepare our expenses to our revenue sources, let you know if we are asking more of our revenue sources in certain functions of the city year over year and, then, we will also provide you our top five revenue sources and our top five expenses for the last fiscal year and, as always, we stand for any questions and we are happy to research any questions for you and get back to you if we need to. De Weerd: Thank you, Todd. Council, any questions? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Not a question, just a compliment as always. Great report. Your staff and -- yourself and your staff have -- do so much with so little and, yes, I have always watched the mill levy, because the mill levy to me means that -- that we as a Council and Mayor and department heads are being very conservative and throughout the whole city. It's always been that way for the 52 years I have lived he re. I have always watched the mill levies and I am -- I am proud to see that ours is almost half of what Nampa, Idaho Falls, Boise, and those other cities are and it's due to our employees and to basically our CEO to make sure that that stays that way and I know it will stay that way. Thank you very much, Todd, for all you do and for your staff. We appreciate it. Lavoie: Council Member, appreciate the good words. Again, don't forget to pat yourself on the back, you have been leading us for 20 years, my friend. Thank you. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 31 of 68 Bird: Thank you. C. Police Department/Code Enforcement Division: Proposed Updates to Nuisance Code De Weerd: And you have seen and led many of those changes. So, thank you. Any other questions? Thank you, Todd. Okay. Item 6 -C is under our Public Works. Oh, sorry. 6-C is under our Police Department. Tom Baker is here to address this item. Baker: Good evening, Madam Mayor and Members of the Council. Hopefully this will get pulled up here pretty quick. So, what we are here to do tonight is put before you our request to have our nuisance code updated, some revisions made, and what it is it's a -- approximately a year and a half collaboration between Code Enforcement and Legal and I want to take a minute to say thank you to Legal for all the hard work going back and forth trying to figure out what the best approach is to get this taken care of. And, then, also before we get into the what, I'd like to talk about the why. What we had with our current code is a lot of great points, a lot of great things that we want to accomplish in regard to nuisance enforcement in the city, but the problem is it's not organized in the best fashion and there is some verbiage that had to be moved from where it currently is to other spots. What you have is two types of nuisances, basically, available in general and whereas it was defined in one portion of the code, further down the general nuisance wasn't defined as well and it wasn't an enumerated as well and, then, further down in 4.2.2 you find that -- and I apologize I'm going to scroll down a little bit. So, what you would find is in 4.2.2 a lot of these abatable and general nuisance sections were actually mixed together and so it made it -- it made it difficult for our officers to actually be able to explain it to the public and I think it had -- had a little bit of a negative effect to when it came to the public trying to understand it. So, basically, what we did, we just rearranged it and put everything in the right spot and we did add a section. The first -- the first change -- would you like me to read every side note on there? Is that necessary? Okay. So, as you can see in the draft it explains on the side what we have done. The only thing we really added was in regard to available nuisances, vegetation obstructing the sidewalk, we didn't have anything in the current ordinance to address that, except for, you know, the trees, which are handled by Elroy and not necessarily by code enforcement and, then, we took the nuisance materials out of the available section and we decided it would be better to take more of a mindset that we do with personal property. We don't want to get into abating people's property or personal property off -- you know, off their actual yards. It's -- we found that it's better for code enforcement in cities to let the judges order the violators to take care of those issues and so we moved this material into the same section. The next ones were just more of what I spoke to you before. We just combined -- we moved things around. We combined some things, clarified some definitions. And, then, you see there is not proposed changes in a lot of the sections. We are clarifying the parties -- responsible parties' obligation to say that abatable nuisances are not addressed or referred to criminal court. And those are the essences of what we have done and I stand for questions. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 32 of 68 De Weerd: Thank you, Tom. Council, any questions about this particular ordinance or code? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: It looks very reasonable to me. I guess make it official instead of a draft, right, Mr. Nary? Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Bird, yes, we would bring forward an actual copy of the ordinance itself and the Council can either decide to have a public input on that -- Bird: Yeah. Nary: -- they are not required to, but you can certainly notice it up for -- on the agenda for public input prior to the Council making a decision on approving it. Bird: That would be my recommendation as one Councilman. De Weerd: Okay. It looks like that's a general direction. So, you can bring this back in its formal -- Bird: Ordinance. De Weerd: -- ordinance and we will have a public hearing on it. Nary: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: What was your process, Tom, in developing this? Baker: I took the current code we have and I looked at it and I read it really carefully and I just cut pieces out of parts where it was talking about the general nuisances and the abatables and I noticed that the two were intermingled. If you look at -- if you look at the current code under 4.2.2 you will see that and so I took those out, because I felt like it was -- it was confusing and I presented it to Legal in a fashion that -- the version I presented to them -- basically I didn't change anything, I just said, hey, you guys write the code, but can we present it like this instead and, then, cut and pasted them into sections by themselves. De Weerd: So -- Baker: I'm sorry. Amongst other general nuisances and separated them. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 33 of 68 De Weerd: Was this in response to confusion when you were out applying this code and questions that you got or -- Baker: It was more response to the teammates, when they were looking at it and -- they were looking at it and saying, well -- I mean if you look at the general nuisance section it's just a tiny little version and, then, the general nuisances are all mixed in and , then, once again, there are certain -- certain points -- parts of it where we didn't want to be in the business of abating general -- certain general nuisances. That -- that just wasn't we felt like a good approach. So, it was to help the team make -- the team members the most. The public -- the questions I have to say are a lot -- been a lot fewer. They just see our letter and they try to comply for the most part. De Weerd: So, this was basically a clean-up, rather than making any substantive changes? Baker: Yes, ma'am. That's correct. De Weerd: Okay. Okay. Well, we will see it on the agenda -- Mr. Nary, when do you think this might come back? Nary: Madam Mayor, based on some of your current agendas, probably the first part of December -- De Weerd: Okay. Nary: -- rather than over the next two weeks. De Weerd: Thank you. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: I got a question. Under each 2.B, the addition there, about adding the -- the cost of the abatement to the utility service bill. If that were to go unpaid, could that start a process of shutting off city services? Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Palmer, I haven't discussed this particular provision with Mrs. Kane, who is the one that wrote it, but the law separates out collection from services. So, since it's unrelated to the service, we could still collect on it, we can't turn off the services for it. Palmer: Thanks. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Tom. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 34 of 68 D. Public Works: Proposed Update to MCC 9-4-24 Baker: Thank you. Okay. Item 6-D is under Public Works. Hi, Kyle. Radek: Hello, Madam Mayor, Council Members. Excuse me. We don't want to be outdone, so we have our own code update we want to prepare -- that we want to share with you. If you recall, a few weeks ago at the October 3rd Council, a gentleman named Merlin Slyter presented to you about an appeal to a board of adjustment decision and we had a pretty lengthy discussion about what our code regarding sewer billing had in it and some areas that could be written better and Council directed us to go back and -- and see if we could come up with something better, specifically Council Woman Milam said it ought to be something that you don't have to be an engineer or a lawyer to understand, so we had an engineer and lawyer rewrite it. But we did have Karie and Connie involved as well and Alex Freitag, so -- so we -- we believe we have got something better that we would like to show to you tonight and I don't think we need any action on it tonight, I would just like to walk through it with you and see -- see how you like it and see if you have any comments. Now, this is the current -- current code that we went over, perhaps ad nauseum at the October 3rd meeting, and, let's see, Warren is going to pass out a copy of the current sections of code and, then, the draft of what we propose to you in its entirety, so you can review it at your own time. Now, we were trying to change 9-4-24, but when we did that we found that we needed to change a couple definitions , which are in another section, they are just related. So -- so, we did change the -- what was sewer to wastewater user, which is consistent with the way the code was already written in 9-24 and, then, the winter average was defined in there and we took it out and we came up with a better name for it and I will share that with you in a minute. So -- so, I'm just going to walk through -- at first I set up a bunch of slides to explain to you what we did and why and, then, that was taking just as many slides as if I just show you the rewrites. So, I'm just going to show you the rewrite and walk through it. So, here is the beginning of it. 9- 4-24. This is the beginning and it reads: Wastewater user charges are comprised of base fees, user -- use fees and, assessment fees. And, then, A, wastewater based fees. To cover the fixed costs of the wastewater system each account is charged a monthly flat base fee. The wastewater base fee shall be established by resolution of City Council. So, that seems pretty straight forward. It's reorganized and we are giving -- giving people one at a time. First, let's talk about base fees. Here they are. That's your -- that's your - - I think it's five -- $5.85 or five something for sewer and you're going to pay that every month, whether you use zero gallons or 10,000 gallo ns. So far so good? Okay. Wastewater use fees now. Monthly use fees for wastewater collection, sewer, and treatment in the city are based on the gallons of water collected and treated as determined by water meter readings for the water used, which is delivered to the same building or account. The fee per gallon on use shall be established by resolution of City Council. Wastewater use is determined according to the following -- Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 35 of 68 Milam: Kyle, I have something that might make this simpler. If you switched sewer and put it after -- between wastewater and collection -- wastewater, sewer, collection and treatment, it changes the sentence and it makes it more understandable I think. Radek: Well, I think the point we are trying to make here is that -- what you're paying for is -- is not just sewer, but you're paying for wastewater collection, which is sewer and you're paying for treatment for the wastewater. So -- I mean we will take that -- Milam: Okay. Radek: -- we will take that as a note and see what the group thinks. I personally think that the sewer is describing the wastewater collection, because that's all wastewater collection is and people -- we specifically put that in there, because people -- people refer to it as their sewer bill, but it's -- paying for sewer is the least of what it pays for, you know, and as you guys know, because you're -- you're always seeing Clint Dolsby coming up here asking for money and -- and that's what -- that's where the money is, it's in wastewater treatment. De Weerd: You must be a water guy. Radek: I'm a water guy, so -- so, there is another reason why I'm up here talking about wastewater fees, should it be -- it should be Dolsby. Milam: Okay. Radek: Okay. So, we can go to the next one and this is where we get -- this is where we start getting into something that could be confusing, but, hopefully, we have got it organized a little better. So, this is -- we are talking about use fees and we figure -- figure out how much use according to the following. Okay. Residential accounts. There are two time periods during which wastewater use is determined during the year. Winter period. During four winter months, between November and March, wastewater use is based on monthly gallons of water delivered as determined by water meter readings . And we give an example. The example of 5,000 gallons of water were delivered, then, 5,000 gallons of wastewater use will be billed for that month. Depending on the account billing cycle, the four months that comprise the winter period will either be November through February or December through March. I will wait and see if anybody has any questions on that. De Weerd: I don't think you need to read all of this. Radek: Okay. De Weerd: Unless Council really wants you to. Radek: Well, I'm getting a shake of yes. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 36 of 68 De Weerd: Do you want him to read it all? Radek: And, Madam Mayor, it's not going to be that brutal. It's -- it's -- this is probably the worst slide -- De Weerd: Okay. Radek: -- for reading. But I thought because of the discussion last time I thought this might be the best way to just -- so I will continue if there is no objection. De Weerd: It's all up to Council. Radek: Okay. So, B, summer -- De Weerd: I'm thinking I could read it myself. Radek: Okay. Do you have a question? Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: So, explain to me -- help me understand why -- or how the difference would end up being whether you end up on the November to February or on the December to March. Radek: Okay. Thank you. Councilman Palmer, I -- thanks for the question, because I figured somebody needed to answer that. We -- we have two account cycles. An account cycle that ends on the 5th of the month and one that ends on the 20th of the month. And so you -- you could get a meter read on the 5th of November and that's going to represent, really, the water you used in October. But if you get a meter read on the 20th of November that will really represent the water you used in November. Palmer: Okay. Radek: And that's the reason. You want to -- you want to get the use reflected in the winter and if -- and we have really found that if -- if you start too early, people are still watering their lawns in the shoulder season. So, it really screws up the billing. Palmer: Madam Mayor? So, then, the latter would -- would -- the meter read would end on March 5th, not March 20th? Radek: Correct. If you -- if you were March 5th, then -- then you would -- you would be -- be in that winter period through March, because that's your February usage. Yeah. So, summer period. During the months outside and it counts winter period -- wastewater use is also based on monthly gallons of water delivered until the amount of water delivered reaches the account's wastewater use cap. This is our new term. Wastewater Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 37 of 68 use cap. And, then, the one below is going to define it. If monthly water delivery is higher than the account's wastewater use cap, then, the wastewater use cap serves as the month's wastewater use for billing. Example. If 9,000 gallons of water were delivered, but the wastewater use cap for the acco unt is 6,000 gallons, then, 6,000 gallons of wastewater use will be billed. The wastewater use cap is calculated as follows -- so, this is part of the question you're thinking of now is what is this wastewater use cap. It's the average monthly number of gallons of water that were delivered to the account during the winter period, because that's what we used to call the winter average and I think the addition of the wastewater use cap, it's really what it is, it's a cap , it's -- you're not going to get billed that -- that wastewater use cap -- you weren't going to get billed that winter average before, unless you use at least that much or more in the summertime . If that makes sense. Okay. So, now we have the -- the question that Mr. Slyter brought up addressed in number two is default wastewater use cap. So, in any instance where the customer's wastewater use cap calculates to less than 1,000 gallons per month or there is no customer data to calculate the wastewater use cap, which be an example of a new customer. The default wastewater use cap shall be applied. The default wastewater use cap shall be established by resolution of City Council and is intended to represent the monthly wastewater use of a typical residential accou nt. So, if it's a new account, you have no account history, we are going to give the default wastewater use cap, which at this point in our -- we took it out of the city code. The old city code had that as the 6,500 number that you might remember. And as you can imagine, the 6,500 number -- there was a significant discussion about the 6,500 number. It was an old number and we need to update that number. But we should do that as a matter of bringing to Council like perhaps every time we do a wastewater master plan, we look at our billing records and we say, oh, let's update the wastewater use cap, because people are using less water now than they did five years ago. Okay. Upon request -- you know, so we provide an opportunity for people to review. So, number three. Upon request the wastewater use cap may be reviewed and evaluated. The determination of applicability will be made by the city Public Works director or designee and include an evaluation of current and potential water and sewer uses at the property and to determine if the application to adjust the wastewater use cap was in fair wastewater billing. So, even if -- in the case of say Mr. Slyter, your wastewater use cap was -- it calculated to less than a thousand gallons, so it kicked into the default and you called up and said, hey, you know, my house is vacant, I need to have my wastewater use cap reviewed, there is still a mechanism for that, for people that it didn't quite work out right. But we think the vast majority of -- of people that are going to end up with a -- a calculated cap less than a thousand or people that are probably snowbirds that come back after the wintertime and, in fact, are using water and sewer in their house in the summertime. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Kyle. So, somebody moves, so they have a new account, but there used to be some -- there was another family that lived in that house. Do you use their winter average Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 38 of 68 or do you go in the default winter average, because it's not their history, but it is the history of this particular home? Radek: Okay. I think -- Councilman -- Council Woman Milam and -- Madam Mayor and Council Woman Milam, thank you for the question. I think we got that covered pretty well. We say -- we say, oh there was no -- if there is no customer data calculated -- wastewater use cap, then, we are going to put a default, but if that customer has data from somewhere else -- like if they moved from somewhere else in Meridian, we are going to say, oh, well, you had an account over at that other address, you just bought a new house. So, we know how much water you use. We know what your wastewater use cap should be. Or in the past -- and this code would still allow it. In the past Karie has said, well, you have moved to Meridian from another town, if you still -- if you have -- if you have billing records from the other town, you're the same family, we can set your wastewater use cap from your customer data that you're providing us from somewhere else and I think that's still -- that's still -- what we have written here allows the flexibility for MUBS to be able to do that. Milam: By customer, not by property. Radek: Correct. So, for commercial accounts -- you may recall we had a discussion about a year ago where we talked about allowing commercial accounts to be on the -- then what we called the credit calc average, but now we are going to call it the wastewater use cap. If it was appropriate and Council instructed us to move forward with that change, with the change that was going to occur in the assessments portion and that assessment portion hasn't happened, so this change hasn't been made or -- commercial account, wastewater use fees for all the uses -- users, such as commercial and industrial, are based on actual monthly water delivered as determined by water meter readings. So, to most commercial accounts there is no summer period or winter period, you just get charged for the water that you get delivered, assuming that everything is delivered goes down the sewer. However, A, commercial accounts, that show a residential pattern of water and wastewater use, may be eligible for an applied wastewater use cap during the summer period as set forth in the section for residential accounts and determination of the applicability for that will be made by the Public Works director or designee and including evaluation of the current and potential water and sewer use of the property to determine if the application of a wastewater use cap will result in fair wastewater billing. So, if we can apply that and it -- it works and it's fair, then, we can do it. Additionally, we have the B, commercial accounts with water uses that are not collected in the sewer, may be eligible for periodic adjustment to the wastewater portion of their bill if the amount of water used, but not collected can be demonstrated, that's referring to like a cooling tower situation and we have several of those right now. This just codifies the -- the practice that we -- we are generally doing now for like a -- I'm trying to think of the companies. There is about five companies that have cooling towers and they will evaporate water throughout the year and those cooling towers have meters that show how much they evaporate and they can apply for an adjustment every year and get their money back for that. And, then, the wastewater assessment fees, I won't bother to read this, because this is where we stopped the -- the proposed changes. There is one change to this paragraph, which is Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 39 of 68 the last sentence. Single family residential assessment fees shall be based on one ERU, because the rest of the paragraph talked about everything except single family residential, but it didn't say what single family residential should be, so we want to slide that in there and, then, this table of equivalent residential units, we are not proposing any changes to that at this point. I think the -- the assessment fees and the ERUs is a whole separate effort that's been undertaken by Alex and company and if you want an update on that we can provide that. And, then, there was one other reference section that had that 6,500 and it really doesn't belong there. This Section, 9-4-27, really just says when you get a bill you should pay it and -- and, then, it talked about for new residential construction placed during the eight lawn sprinkling months, which is really the summer, we are talking about that 6,500 again and so we said, well, that doesn't really belong there anyway, so we want to take it out. So, I'm sorry -- there were a couple in there that were a little rough, Madam Mayor, but we made it through. So, I guess we would just ask Council for any comments and then -- and, then, obviously there is Council Members that aren't here and will want to read the proposed changes and -- and they can get comments back to me or Andrea at any time. De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Madam Mayor, I'm sitting here imagining if it was me two years ago sitting in the audience, that I can imagine the things going through their heads are what in the world just happened, but that was a really big deal and I love the changes . I mean I have had people ask me -- especially when they first moved into a place to explain their utility b ill to them and I have tried and I just -- but if I had this side show and did exactly what you just did, I feel like I could help them understand that the calculation s, as complicated as they are, really are actually kind of simple and are there to benefit them. It would be a lot easier for us to just charge what they use, but by going to this effort makes it as accurate as humanly possible and benefits our customers. So, thanks for going through all that and making that happen, because I think that's a beautiful thing. De Weerd: A beautiful thing. So, Mr. Clerk, maybe you can send Mr. Palmer a link to this particular one, so when he gets those questions he can direct them to this presentation and a verbatim, blow by blow, call. And thank you for walking us through that. You did clarify a lot of the different elements that Mr. Slyter had raised. Radek: Okay. Well, Madam Mayor, well, we will just -- I guess unless Council has some other direction, we will wait and see if they are anymore comments from the -- certainly from any of you or from the missing council members and, then, maybe come back to you and say, yeah, we think we have got all the hundred percent comments and we are ready to have a final draft and we will let you know when that happens. De Weerd: And we can set this out again for December and have it available for public comment. Radek: Sounds good. Thank you, Madam Mayor. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 40 of 68 De Weerd: Thank you. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: One more thing. So, it looks great to me. I really like all the changes. What -- and you said in the beginning of your presentation that you showed it to -- you shared it with Mr. Slyter. What were his reactions? Radek: Councilwoman Milam, he did have -- he did have a couple minor comments. He had a comment about what I read to you on -- if we don't have any -- if we don't have any data to calculate wastewater use cap -- and he thought of a way that that might potentially work against the customer, he suggested something else about -- and he is looking at it from the perspective of -- which who he is, he's a landlord and sometimes he keeps the account in his name and a new renter moves in and we never see that and so he suggested some other language, but with his other language we wouldn't -- we wouldn't be -- it wouldn't allow us to say you're a new customer, but you have old data somewhere and show it to us and we will set it to that. So, there is pluses and minuses. But it's a -- it's a pretty minor detail that I think we can maybe go back and, you know, try wordsmithing to see if it meets his concern, but all in all I think is Andrea got his comments and I think all in all he was fairly happy with what we did. De Weerd: Thank you. Milam: Thank you. Radek: Thank you. E. Legal: Updates to City Code provisions regarding Chief Financial Officer/Information Services Director 1. Ordinance No. 17-1753: An Ordinance of the City of Meridian Amending Meridian City Code Section 1-8-1, Regarding Appointment of Department Officials by Mayor; Repealing Title 1, Chapter 8, Article E, Meridian City Code; Amending Meridian City Code Section 1-9-3(G)(7), Regarding Compensation Changes; Amending Meridian City Code Section 1-8B-2, Regarding Duties of the Chief Financial Officer; and Providing an Effective ate. De Weerd: Okay. Item 6-E is under our Legal Department. Nary: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Hopefully this will be quite short. With the changes in our management team, with the elimination of the sports services director position with the city, we are proposing an ordinance change, but I'm not Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 41 of 68 going to ask you to pass this tonight, although it does have a number attached to it , because we did include in the title repealing the section of the code that identif ies support services director, but it didn't make it into the draft. It should be a portion of this -- oh, never mind. I apologize. It is in Section 2. I just missed it. So, if you want you can pass it tonight. It simply just eliminates support services and puts their duties and responsibilities under the chief financial officer's position for information services, for the city clerk's office and the IT. Everything else is pretty much the same, as, again, the duties and responsibilities of IT and the city clerk to the duties of the CFO. If you have any other questions or if you like you can pass it tonight. If you want to have time to think about it you certainly can do that. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Move that we approve ordinance number 17 -- Bird: Need to read it first. Milam: No? What? Oh, she has to read it. All right. I'm trying to get through this. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Looking this over and stuff, I -- I have -- I'm willing to pass it today, but I think with two of our Council Members missing, maybe we better bring it back for next week -- Milam: I'm okay with that. Bird: -- and let them do it. So, if that would be with the rest of the Council, I would -- I would entertain a motion that we just bring ordinance number 17 -1753 back next week on November the 21st for adoption. Milam: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to continue this item until next week. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. F. Community Development/Building Services Division: Emissions Testing Facilities - Permitting Recommendation Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 42 of 68 De Weerd: Okay. Item 6-F is under our Community Development and Building Services Division and I am assuming that Brent is -- is starting with this. Okay. Bjornson: Good evening, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. I'm here tonight to hopefully have a short discussion regarding the International Building Code, the temporary use permitting component, and, then, the Unified Development fees. I have also got Caleb and C.Jay and Mr. Nary here to discuss some of the TUP aspects and the UDC if necessary. The issue before you this evening is that the emissions testing stations as you can see -- I'm going to back up. The little picture there at the bottom, that's typically what we see in Meridian as vehicle emissions. That's what we are talking about. These stations operate in small accessory buildings throughout Meridian, Boise and the whole state as you know. They are typically less than 120 square feet overall size. They require electrical. And there is typically no permanent foundation. The challenge is that they can't comply with standards for temporary use, because they are in place year around, a temporary would be 120 days. These businesses stay year around and, then, they can't comply with the standards for permanent use, because the IBC, Chapter 18, requires a foundation. Foundations are challenging for existing areas of pavement. If they relocate the small facility and it's just challenging and costly. So, in order to do a foundation we would have to issue a certificate of occupancy and it would have to be in compliance with the International Building Code. We are trying to provide some information here and look at a different opportunity. The problem is that, again, with these accessory buildings used as emissions testing, there is no foundation, they are typically less than 120 square feet, they are year around and they do not comply with the TUP, the IBC, and the UDC codes. Solutions would be to cite existing facilities and not allow new facilit ies and accessory buildings. The pros of that would be removes ambiguity, challenges -- or changes aesthetic landscape. The cons would be decreases availability of the service needed by the citizens to get their vehicles tested. Second solution would be to create a new category for the temporary use. Pros of that would be the facilities would be subject to the TUP standards on 360 days is not temporary, which creates inconsistency with the IBC, Chapter 18, issuance of certificate of occupancy and the third item there is to expand the building code exceptions, permit section, Chapter 1 in Section 105, there is an area for structures that are 120 square feet and less and we are proposing to include that with the emissions testing facilities. The pros facilitates facilities subject to UDC standards, eliminates foundation requirement, and recognizes permanent nature of use. The cons are the aesthetic, safety issues associated with a temporary use building for a permanent use, largely resolved by host business. Meaning that a host business typically has a certificate of occupancy and these emissions testings are ancillary on the property. I want to jump to the last slide here, because it has some FAQs on emission testing stations and why and how they are different than TUPs. I won't read it all, but on the left there you can see the emission testing stations and the temporary sales units on the right. And, then, if you have any questions we can -- we can talk about that, I suppose, on this. Let me guide you through it. On the left side, the emissions testing station, as you can see that they provide a service that citizens are mandated to obtain by law. Public use per the UDC. And, then, accessory building owned by the tenant is common model for the emissions testing stations. The ETS is to be available inside service stations. ETS's are accessory to permanent proprietor where they are located and emission testings are year Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 43 of 68 around demand by consumers and operators. And on the right, you can see the temporary sales units. Our recommendation before we talk about questions and to see what the thoughts are, is to add emissions testing facility into Section 105 of the International Building Code to expand that as you see in that first bullet. To allow an accessory structure of 120 square feet or less to include emission testing facilities . And, then, 105 there in the middle of the slide, you will see -- that's actual code language. Work exempt from permit. And, then, in that last paragraph where it says building, that is actual building code language as well. So, what we would do is, essentially, insert emission testing facilities within that paragraph. So, effectively, in the building code, one story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses, emission testing facilities, and similar uses, provided the floor area is not greater than 120 square feet, would be exempt in the building code . Other commercial pump houses -- those fall in the same category. So, at this point I would like to see if there is any questions -- stand for questions and, then, I do have an action item recommendation that I wanted to let you know this right now that we are currently in a code adoption cycle. Next Tuesday at the public hearing on November 21st is a public hearing for building code. So, this allows us an opportunity to insert this in now with your review and approval if we decide that's the best solution. And building code adoption is in draft -- in draft form right now. We can notice as required to the institutions per state law and, then, I can update the BCA and we can move forward. So, I am -- I will stand for questions and talk through this and -- Bird: Council, any questions? Brent, I think -- I think this is a very -- very good way to handle that and I -- I, for one, would like to see it within our code. This gives them a way to keep their facilities without having to get a building permit and all the -- going through all that stuff. I would like to see it incorporated in. I can't speak for everybody, but -- Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Mr. President. I think this is ridiculous. I think we -- a few weeks ago we had a discussion on snow cone shacks and how we were going to make sure that they weren't going to be allowed to stay in one place throughout a year, whether they were being used or not, but because there is a government requirement that this testing take place, we are going to amend our code to allow those kind of shacks to be in place year around. I think if -- if we are going to go to such great lengths to ensure that -- that all these other temporary use shacks -- that we clear any ways for them to get around code and have to be moved or removed yearly, then, I think we should be consistent with our applying that and not make an exception, because it makes it more convenient for another government agency. Bird: Any other questions? I don't disagree with the -- the fact that the snow cone shacks -- I think I have pretty well -- everybody knows where I stand on that. There is a lot of families there. I -- but I do believe that this -- we are required by state law to have our emissions checked and -- and I think that it's got to the point where people that were doing it are not doing it anymore, and it's just these specialized things that we need to make sure we have them available. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 44 of 68 Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Just for clarification. It's not state law. It's another local -- Bird: Well, it's a county law. Palmer: So it -- I think as long as they are going to enforce this on us, then, I don't think we need to make any special exceptions for their often dilapidated shacks, compared to the -- I mean they may exist, but I don't know off the top of my head a snow cone shack that's dilapidated. In fact, even though they are only in business for a few months. I say no way. De Weerd: Well, there is a clear difference and I think this -- this chart shows you that there is a year around demand for emission testing, it's not a temporary use, and with dilapidated buildings -- I don't think a snow cone shack is going to try and do that, because that reflects on the quality of what they are going to be serving. So, it -- it is different. Bjornson: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, if I might add, on the temporary sales units on the right, we did take into effect that, yes, snow cone shacks up there at the bottom, it is, as you say, Madam Mayor, that it's a seasonal demand. I just wanted to add one last thought, that with these emissions testing facilities that they would require an electrical permit, we would still permit through the building department for electrical, and in my mind they don't pose a significant life safety concern , as there is no public use. There is typically one occupant, it's part time a lot of the times, and they are pre- engineered, pre-manufactured structures a lot of the time. So, again, it's not for public use, the structure itself, other than one employee, depending on the hours that it's open and we would permit it electrically. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I definitely see Councilman Palmer's point, but given the fact that we are required and it's one of those things I find a real pain, I think that most people do, we have got to make it as easy for our citizens as possible to get their emissions done and -- and make them -- let them be convenient and I think the only way we are going to be able to do that is to grant them an exception. De Weerd: Any other comments? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mrs. Milam. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 45 of 68 Milam: I'm kind of swaying back and forth here like a pendulum. But I definitely think we need to make it more convenient for our citizens. So, whatever that is. If that's, you know, making an exception for these. But maybe some standards aren't such a bad thing either and -- and I don't know if the right answer is just removing the -- obviously, it's not a temporary use, so that's the wrong place for it. But putting it in with a shed that's in somebody's backyard, I'm not sure that that's the right place for it either, because it is a public -- and it can become an eye sore and it can become a problem. So, down the road what -- you know, if we make this too simple and so they are just popping up all over the place, down the road what's going to happen with -- if we just have a whole bunch of old dilapidated testing stations. De Weerd: So, I'm sorry, I had to step out, but did you talk about how you -- how you worked to get to this point? Bjornson: I did not and that's a great point, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. We have had several meetings with the city clerk's office, our Legal Department. I think we have noodled this with planning as well. There are considerations on both sides, as you have indicated here and as Councilman Palmer has indicated. You know, I think it is a tough fit to Council Women Milam's point. We were looking for the best fit. We were trying to use good judgment and trying to find the best solution and just a practical application on how are we going to deal with these? You know, you can make them really intensive and a lot of process. I personally don't feel a life safety element is there. I say that with some reservation, but at the same time there was limited use and we are not bringing the general public in and we have got a lot of temporary structures that fit into that 120 square foot or less. So, to answer your question we have discussed it at staff level. We have provided here our best recommendation and wanted to put it before you. With the timing of the code adoption we are currently working -- currently working on, we feel it's a good fit into Section 105 of the IBC and for large practical purposes it fits that intent. Unless there is any real strong opposition or a reason to just take this into another meeting or discuss it further, I guess the action item that I propose is just the timeline that we feel that we have got a -- a pretty good product that we would like to get into our code option here, so it's implemented January 1, 2018, with the building code option. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Bird. Bird: I would like to see it get in -- into the code, so that these existing buildings, emission testing facilities, do not have to be removed. De Weerd: Well, I -- I guess we can put it in in form and put it out for public hearing and -- and that's coming up. Do we have a date set? Bjornson: Public hearing for the building code adoption is next Tuesday, the 21st. And, again, that building code adoption is in draft form , so we felt it would be good to -- in Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 46 of 68 communication with our Legal Department, put it in at that point and present it next Tuesday. If we had the approval in this meeting to move forward. De Weerd: Okay. Council, what's -- what's your pleasure? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I will state it again. I think we ought to put it in for the public hearing and let's see what comes down next week at the public hearing. De Weerd: Okay. You can bring that back with the other item s and we will address it next week. Bjornson: Excellent. Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. G. Community Development/Planning Division: Idaho Avenue Amenities - Transfer of Ownership from Meridian Development Corporation to City of Meridian and Next Steps 1. Resolution No. 17-2048: Joint Resolution of Meridian Development Corporation and City of Meridian Signifying Transfer by MDC and Acceptance by City of Idaho Avenue Decks, Planters, and Bicycle Rack De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Item 6-G is under our -- or 6 -- I'm sorry. 6-H is under our Parks Department. 6-G. So, I was correct. Hood: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. I'm going to talk to you a little bit about Idaho Avenue. To refresh your memory, in 2015 the city and the Meridian Development Corporation agreed to jointly fund some streetscape improvements on Idaho Avenue between Main and 2nd Street. Each agency spent approximately 12,000 dollars on decking, planters, other improvements to -- like paint and candles to direct traffic on that block. We had an agreement and it really laid out the terms of how we would proceed in coming up with what we would put down there working with Meridian Development Corporation and the city staff. What it didn't address was ownership after the project actually got in the street. So, that's what -- what the action item is on your agenda today is a resolution. On November 8th the MDC board voted to approve the joint resolution you have on your agenda today, transferring ownership of those materials to the city. The timing was -- was pretty good in that while staff of MDC and the city were talking about, hey, we need to clean this up, it's kind of jointly owned property, MDC had it under their insurance. The city partially owned it. The Mayor's office received an e- mail concern from a property owner in that block discussing some concerns they had with the decking in particular. Really twofold. The gathering of the leaves this time of year and the gathering in the storm drain and potential -- if we have another winter like we had Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 47 of 68 last year, some flooding and those types of things. So, I thought it was opportunistic as this joint resolution was before you to bring that up with you as well. Some business owners have also questioned how successful this was as -- just as a reminder, this was never meant as a permanent installation . It was a pilot project, kind of test drive alternative, cross-sections in this block, and so, again, I felt the timing was good to just touch base with you on that. Really two fold again. The street sweepers that are not able to pick up the leaves due to the decks and planters and, then, the usefulness, if you will, of the -- the decking that's out there now. So, after being forwarded on that e-mail from the Mayor's office, I met with Nick Grove, who is the president of the Meridian Downtown Business Owners Association to discuss those issues, both of them, the maintenance and the -- the worth of the streetscape improvements and we thought it would be a good idea to jointly host a meeting with those business owners on there. We have also had quite a bit of turnover in that block of businesses, if you think about it, in just the two years that this is -- the two summers that that's been out there we have had a high percentage of businesses turn over just in that block downtown. So, that meeting is going to be hosted here at City Hall on Monday, November 20th, at 3:00 p.m. Postcards went out last week inviting both business owners and property owners to that meeting. So, as you consider accepting a hundred percent ownership of these planters and the decks and the -- and the bike rack that's out there, I just want to make you aware that these discussions were also going on. Further, I wanted to get some feedback from you and in the memo I kind of put some options out there. We don't have to do anything right now, but I just wanted to let you know there are some business owners on that block that are kind of questioning, hey, is the experiment over, what are we doing with it, what's the next steps? So, just kind of wanted to get maybe some feedback from you even before meeting with the business owners. I don't -- I didn't put any money in the budget for FY-18 to do any of this, we don't have money to go and pick up the leaves or pick up the deck and put them to the south side of the road or -- or really do anything, but I just wanted to maybe get some direction, if you have any, in advance of that meeting and, if not, I will report back late this winter on how that meeting went and if those business owners have a unified idea for what they would like to see on that block. So, I think with that, Madam Mayor, again, there is an action there, it's asking you to accept those amenities, but in the same breath we are questioning how long it will actually be in place. So, with that I will stand for any questions you may have. De Weerd: I'm sorry. Caleb, is there any urgency to take action on this? Hood: Madam Mayor, not to my knowledge as far as the joint resolution. Again, the MDC board acted on it this week. We were just following that up. I don't know that there is necessarily any urgency to their joint resolution. The only urgency I would say is if you are concerned -- you share the same concerns about the leaves gathering and leaves gathering even under the decking, obviously, that's of a concern, because most of the trees have dropped their leaves and we are heading into the wet -- potentially wet winter months. So, if we were going to do anything there as far as maintenance o r gather those leaves for the businesses that are on this block, that's the only urgency I see. But, no, nothing necessarily with the joint resolution. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 48 of 68 De Weerd: I think I would be curious before we accept ownership what the -- the meeting next week -- how -- how that develops and maybe our Parks Department can go out and -- and look if there is anything covering a storm drain, at least addressing that and, then, we can have this conversation after you have had a chance to gauge the -- the level of concern and the interest by the property owners in that area. Hood: Madam Mayor, that sounds fair enough to me. Again, that meeting is on the 20th, so I'd like, you know, at least the eight days or if not more to kind of gather our thoughts after that meeting to put something together for you . So, maybe the first meeting in December could put this back on the agenda for your consideration. De Weerd: I think that sounds like a great idea. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we continue Resolution 17-2048 to November 21st, 2017. De Weerd: December 5th? Bird: November. De Weerd: He would like it the first week of December. Bird: Oh, December. De Weerd: Yes. Bird: Oh, I'm sorry. De Weerd: So, that would be December 5th. Bird: For the 5th. December 5th, 2017. De Weerd: Okay. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I'm sorry I misunderstood. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to continue this to December 5th. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 49 of 68 H. Parks Department: South Meridian Regional Park Update De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Caleb. Okay. 6-H is under our Parks Department. Barton: Good afternoon, Madam Mayor, Members of Council, I'm here before you this evening to give you an update on our next park. As you know -- and most of you were there at our latest two park openings. It went very successful. Those are good projects for the community and good to kind of get open and running and now we are -- you know, no rest for the weary -- onto our next project. So, I wanted to -- it's been a little while, so I wanted to give you an update on -- on where we are and what our next steps are. So, as you -- as you remember, I kind of wanted to just take a step back briefly and talk about some of the public outreach at this site in particular and without reading this in detail, you can see that our park system master plan and town hall meeting s, parks and recreation commissions, City Council presentations and, then, we did hold a neighborhood meeting down there that was post card and had the specific surrounding neighbors. We actually went about a mile in each direction, so we went a little fa rther out than -- than normal, because it is kind of rural down there. So, based on all that public outreach and up front work, we came up with this -- the current design, which is our phase one of the 77 acre park down there. So, the overall theme is a discovery theme that's an educational component, it's kind of a learning landscape if you will. There is a couple of lit softball fields, open grass, restroom, concessions, playground, splash pad. We are going to try to incorporate some unique signage in it and other amenities similar to the parks -- the two new parks that we just opened, so we have character and maybe a unique personality, so it's not just a cookie cutter site. The reason for the diagonal phasing line is because that's where the gas line is and Williams pipeline is going to be replacing those lines here in the next three to five years, so to do anything over the top of those would be kind of wasteful. So, we chose that as a phasing line. Taking you back to the budgets in FY-16, we had a budget request for 750,000 dollars. That got us through phase one construction documents and also preconstruction costs with a construction manager. Some of these -- some of what we are doing in this phase is building the infrastructure and the support system that the park -- that future phases can be added to it with -- we have the entrance road, the power infrastructure that's coming in. The pumping system. There is not sewer in -- in that area, so we have a septic system with pumping that is scalable, that we can add another restroom to, so there is some of those -- so, we are doing some of that up front work that will support future phases . In FY-17 Council did approve a six million dollar construction budget. So, where we -- where we started during the design process is just at the schematic design level. We had quite a bit of acreage drawn in. We had a maintenance shop. We had other restroom buildings. Picnic shelters. We had all of these, you know, fully -- a fully loaded site, which does include infrastructure for future phases. So, we got schematic design bids. These are construction estimates, not bids. Back in at 13 million dollars. So, we kind of -- we took a step back and we went, you know, whoa, this is crazy. So, we started to cut and we went back in, we cut three million dollars right off -- right out of the bat with -- with -- back to design development with a park -- you know, some estimated opinion of cost at ten million dollars. So, at that we said, whoa, this is -- you know, we need to cut some more. So, we kept -- kept right on cutting, we got it down at 75 percent construction documents Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 50 of 68 down to 7.5 million. We cut more and right now where we stand at the base bid as 6.8 million. These are -- this is just -- these are opinion of costs from our construction manager. These are not bids. So, part of the update tonight is to kind of just refresh where we are design wise and, then, also talk about bid strategy and -- and what we are hopeful for in the next month here, so we think we have cut it down to where we are -- we are within striking distance of our budget. So, part of our strategy is to -- to do the late fall, early winter bidding. We -- we are going to advertise bids this Friday and our construction manager has already been -- has had some of it out on the street already in talking to contractors and gaining interest in the project , with all the subcontractors there is currently -- you know, one of the big -- one of the biggest construction packages in here is going to be the dirt and underground work, which is asphalt paving, the entrance drive, a lot of the concrete, the storm drains. Right now there is eight people that are going to look at the project. We don't know if we are going to get eight bids, but there is interest from at least eight contractors, which is -- you know, in this climate right now we want to get -- we want to time it in such a way that we do get a lot of interest in the project, we want to make it as simple as possible. We want -- we want guys to really, you know, put -- give us numbers, so we do get good bids. So, in addition to that, we have our base bid and, then, we broke out some add alternate bids and the add alternate bids are the softball field lighting, gravel overflow parking, some additional green space on the northeast corner, a stage for children's performances and, then, also a second picnic shelter. And really, any of these could be -- depending on where bids come -- come in now, they can be done -- they can be done now or they can be approved at a later date , because we are putting -- like the softball field lighting, for instance, we are putting all the conduit in up front, we are having the sector box and all the transformers designed in such a way that we can -- we can add lights. We have to go in and put the piers in and do the wiring and stand the lights up, but we won't be at the point of no return. So, the next steps that we see, you know, depending on where bids come in, the possibility -- I just wanted to -- to, you know, have a conversation that there is a possibility, based on construction costs right now that -- you know, we hear it time and time again that costs are going up, labor costs, and people are busy. They charge more money. I don't think it's going to get any cheaper. I don't think waiting is a good strategy. We don't know what next year is. It's -- I don't think it's going to be any cheaper. So, there is the possibility of at least presenting a budget amendment to cover some of these costs. We will have impact fees accumulated. We have a reimbursement coming in from one of our current parks that will go back into our impact fee account. For the two parks that we just completed there is going to be some savings from those that will go back into the impact fee account , in addition to impact fees collected off building -- current building permits. So, what we would like to do -- we are planning on opening bids December 12th. We would come back to Council on December 19th for the discussion of -- you know, we need to see where our bids are. We -- we may get -- because there is a lot of interest right now in this project, we may get some good bids. We are, you know, fingers crossed. We feel we are doing everything we possibly can to have this thing -- to come back with contracts that can be approved without a budget amendment. But the possibility does exist. So, if everything goes as planned, we will come back to Council on December 19th for contract award for a March 1st groundbreaking. We will construct all next summer, we will let the Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 51 of 68 grass seed heal and establish itself for a park opening on one -- sometime in the summer of 2019. So, with that I would be happy to stand for any questions you might have. De Weerd: Thank you, Mike. Council, any questions? Bird: It looks great. Get it going. De Weerd: This isn't the first time that you have had to do some value engineering and put it out for bid and hope for the best, and -- and we have -- we have been fortunate in other circumstances. I hope to see favorable bids that allow us to get this going in the fashion that -- that this park really is -- is deserving. So, it's going to be one of the -- another unique park that -- that really is responding to the -- the comments that we got from the residents out in those areas that they are looking for and it's really focused on - - on our kids and our families and so I'm excited to see it move forward. Barton: We appreciate it. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I echo your thoughts there. It's -- this is something that the City of Meridian can be very, very proud of and will be very, very proud of. Because I know that everything will be done first class and it will be kept first class. That's the -- one of the proudest thing I see with our -- all of our departments, all of our buildings, all of our properties, we have made sure that we built first class stuff. But, you know what, our employees have made sure it has stayed first class and I am -- I am so proud of that, that our employees buy into it and make it look just like new every day and thank you, Mike, for all you do . I appreciate it. Barton: Thank you for the kind words and -- I mean thank you -- we can't -- we can't do it without you guys, honestly. So, thank you. Bird: Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Anything further? Barton: Thanks. I. Fire Department: Bear Creek Park and Fire Station #6 Review of Actions and Decisions To Date and Outline for Community Outreach and Decision Process Moving Forward De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Item 6-I is an update under our Fire Department. Council, as you know, we have -- we have had an unexpected article in the newspaper and had some outreach from the surrounding neighborhood out in Bear Creek Park about a Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 52 of 68 concept that -- that we haven't heard much of since the initial discussions on exploring this concept and -- and approving a budget for Station 6. So, the chief is here to update us onto what has happened, what the next steps are, and seeking some comments. Niemeyer: Madam Mayor, Members of Council, it's now good evening, instead of good afternoon, like I was here earlier, but I appreciate your patience. Certainly appreciate the folks that are here from the Bear Creek community, the folks that are watching online. The intent of this and the goal of this is to not only provide you with -- Council with information, status updates on where we are at, but to provide the community with updates as well, and, hopefully, answer a lot of questions that, quite honestly, you got some misinformation out there. So, we are hoping to answer a lot of questions this evening, with a lot of follow-up interactions that we are going to be having with the community as well. De Weerd: Good. Because we all had questions, too. Niemeyer: Yes. So, I want to take you back just a little bit. You have seen some of these slides before. The Parks Commission has seen these slides before. But I think it is worth refreshing, because some of the folks in our community have never seen these slides, they have never heard this information, so I think it is worthwhile to go back just a little bit. What was -- a partnership collaboration potential between Parks and Fire to work together on future parks and future fire station locations. We had done some research with other cities that said when you co-locate fire stations with parks, the outcome is good for the community. That was the sense from those other communities and we felt that was worth exploring and is this something that we can explore moving forward as we -- as we grow as a city. Specifically what we were looking at is an immediately need with Station 6. As you know the budget process was moving forward. That got approved. We were beginning the process to look for architects to begin that design process and so we identified a conversation piece about Bear Creek, as well as the south Meridian park that -- that Mike was just up here alluding to -- as a future park location, along with a future fire station location. That's part of the dialogue. We talked about establishing that long term commitment, so when we look at future land use and have those future discussions, quite honestly, long after I'm gone, long after Steve is gone, if it's a viable option we can continue to move this forward as a city as a way we do business. In 2016, back in November, that's when the partnership concept was brought to everybody. It was not anywhere near we are going to go here, we are going to go there, it was do you support a concept of partnership between the Parks Department and the Fire Department moving forward into the future and everybody said, yeah, we like that idea, continue to explore that idea. So, as we looked at ideal fire station locations, every one of our five fire stations -- and you have heard me say this before and talk about this -- every one of our five fire stations right now is on one mile main arterial roads. At the time those were built they were the right location, they were the right spot for sure. I don't think we understood and projected out what that traffic congestion was going to look like on some of these main roads, specifically on Franklin Road, certainly Eagle Road, Locust Grove, Linder. In the morning and in the evening those roadways are very congested. It's part of our growth. So, as we looked at that data, that anecdotal evidence we were getting from crews about Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 53 of 68 the difficulties getting out onto those roadways to respond to calls and difficulty getting back into the station as they were coming back , we said is that the right spot for fire stations on main arterials. And so we began exploring that and what we looked at was is the half mile a better place to put a fire station. Typically the half miles, then, go onto a main arterial. As you all know, we have Opticoms on our fire engines. Those are the traffic signal preemption devices that when we are responding to an emergency with our lights and sirens we can -- we can initiate a traffic signal change so we can get through those -- those intersections. Again, Franklin Road is a good comparison in a way. Franklin Road -- the tarmac that we come out onto and the intersection right there is 136 feet. We often have difficulties getting out onto Franklin, because cars are parked in front of our tarmac, so it makes it very difficult for us to get those apparatus out. Coming back into Fire Station 1 right there we almost literally have to get in the left-hand turn lane of the westbound traffic to turn into the station. It's a very significant traffic hazard. So, that was one of our concerns is we didn't want to replicate that moving. Again, I mentioned the easy access. We did identify that for us as we look at our call volume and we can map this in GIS and map those call clusters, we typically see call clusters in and around parks, in and around schools, and in and around large subdivisions, large residential subdivisions. It really makes sense if you th ink about it. Those are where the calls are going to occur. Outside of the roadways our rural calls, are more distance calls, are the minority. Our primary calls are clustered within those areas of real growth that we see. So, it does make sense to -- when we look at a fire station location placement, to identify those areas in and around where that growth is occurring to meet, then, the future demand. So, looking at -- at Station No. 6 as we were discussing locations and what are optimal locations -- again, just as a refresher, the Meridian Rural Fire Protection District currently owns -- it still does -- property on Overland Road just east of Linder. We have had a sign up there for several years. They bought that in anticipation of a future station. This is a long standing relationship that the city and the district have had regarding land acquisition, station growth. That location was not ideal, mainly because of that Linder Road concern that we had. However, in comparison to Station 1, the inte rsection to the tarmac of the Overland property is 336 feet. So, obviously, there is a larger distance between that and what we see at Station 1. But, again, there are some concerns with that location, five lanes, just like Franklin Road is. So, we wanted to make sure that if we were going to be there it was the right place through a good analysis. The planning team did go out and explore possibilities on Stoddard Road. We identified that that was within the same geographical area that we were looking to build Station 6 to provide service to the folks in southwest Meridian. And in that we identified some open space on Stoddard and Bear Creek Park and that started a discussion with Parks of is this a possibility? That's really where the conversation started. So, this is, as you know, Bear Creek Park and this was the concept area where we said is there any possibility of putting a fire station here. It makes sense to us, but we need to have that discussion, we need to further explore it, and we are still literally in that -- in that phase of exploration. So, the next steps. And, again, this is still going back to 2016 when we initially started talking about the next steps that we all had was to meet with the Parks staff and explore the possibilities. We did that. We did discuss with the Mayor and Council the idea of co- locating Parks and Fire. We did not talk about Bear Creek specifically then, we just said do you all think this is a good idea from a policy standpoint for the City of Meridian. T he Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 54 of 68 answer to that was, yes. We did present it to the parks commission to get feedback from them and they liked the idea of partnerships as well. So, at that point we identified the next steps that are pretty standard in our department when we go to look to build a new fire station and, really, that was to engage an architect, to begin the drawings -- the conceptual drawings of the fire station regardless of land location and, then, be able to have a conversation with the community about here is our concep t, what do you think. That's the way we have done all other five fire stations. That's the way we are going to proceed with this one. To that point -- and I brought this up earlier. We are engaging that architect -- and that's two weeks. So, we have that architect identified. So, that's the strategy we were taking. That's the strategy we had taken before. Certainly we can question whether that strategy was right at this point, but that was the road we were going down. I will say this that at this point in the presentation, like every other city department that we have, our goal is to be good stewards and good partners with our community and if that's not a good marriage and you need counseling on the front end of that, you probably need to revisit and so certainly whatever we are talking about here, there is a lot of public outreach that's involved in each one of these processes and we do listen to the community. We do not want to partner with a community that does not want us there. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense. So, kind of where we are at today -- some benefits real quick that we identified that we feel are benefits. For the Fire department we love the fact that we get to engage our community. When you're -- when you co- locate a fire station within a park and our firefighters are not running calls and they are not training, they have an opportunity to go and engage our community to that park interaction. We think that's a great concept. In the communities we talked to they identified that as a positive as well. It is quick access to medical emergency as mentioned and we do have medical emergencies in parks, whether it's sports related, whether it's bee stings, whether it's allergic reactions, whatever it is, we do have medical emergencies in parks. It's not a ton, but we certainly have them. This would give us quick access to those. It is easy access for citizens with questions or mild injury that need to be looked at. They are usually located off the main arterials and we like the idea of incorporating a residential feel design into our fire station, as opposed to the standard real commercial, big brick, big mortar look, we feel like we should be a part of a community in our design process. We did like those benefits. And we give some benefits to parks as we look forward to this. Moving forward into the future there is some 24/7 surveillance of a park when you have a fire station. We are a 24/7 operation, 365 days a year, and so there is some sense of security you have when you have a fire station located within or close to a park. So, I think it does demonstrate good stewardship of public funds through partnership, quick access to medical emergencies as far as patrons. We have talked about a concept of a design when we have a fire station located within a park if we do that in the future, of having a community room as part of our station design where that local community could use that community room for HOA meetings or community engagement and, then, also placement of AEDs and maintenance of AEDs. We know where our AED program is going. We have them in all the parks and so this is a good way for us to engage and be involved in that on an ongoing basis. We identified back then some challenges to a Bear Creek partnership if that were to be a viable option. Lots of green space. That's a big deal for the parks department. They, as you know, try and maintain a certain level of open space per thousand residents. So, any kind of Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 55 of 68 relationship with a Bear Creek partnership would lose park space that would need to be made up. So, we did discuss that and identified how that could happen. There is a possible loss of amenities to the location we had discussed, specifically the basketball court and potential sidewalk. We identified could that be rebuilt if that were a location that was viable and, then, certainly the Bear Creek area homeowners. We identified that b ack in 2016 as something that would need to be -- we would need to engage with the homeowners to ensure this is a good marriage, this is a good partnership and so that has been the plan all along with community engagements. So, then, really what happened to kind of get this to today. We did have an article come in the Meridian Press talking about Station 6. I can just say I have known Holly a long time. She's a great reporter. She didn't mean any harm by this I have no doubt. Chief Butterfield was ans wering her questions honestly, so I think that was all honest. There was no intent to do harm, just bad timing. This article didn't need to come out now, because we are still -- we have a lot of road, a lot of process to do before we can get to a point of a decision. That's -- there is a lot of work to do still to have something like this come out and talk about where it's going to be located. So, this happened. Obviously, this caused a lot of concern. Rightfully so. If I was a citizen located, I would be a little bit concerned about this, thinking I didn't even get an opportunity to comment. So, we understand that -- that angst that people have. We are very respectful of that. At the same time, unfortunately -- and Public Works accidentally kind of mentioned this -- they had some work being done at the -- the well expansion, they had some survey work being done, as well as a crane that was working on the -- on the well house there. There was some folks that assumed that that was the start of the surveying for the fire station. It was not. This was a completely separate project. But it's on its own time line. So, they asked can you make sure that -- that we identify and separate this project that is a separate project from any kind of fire station discussion and so -- but this was going on. That added a little bit to the -- to the challenge. And I just wanted to mention this real quick and I'm not looking for sympathy. So, I -- for two months I had planned to have three impacted wisdom teeth pulled out by an oral surgeon. That was Wednesday morning and that's about the same time the Mayor's office started getting a lot of concerns and e -mails. So, Mayor, I just want to thank you for your team in responding back to those. I did text the Mayor -- I'm not even sure what I texted you, but I said I'm on medication, I don't think I should reply, and so I appreciate your office taking the lead on that and cover us during that -- that moment when I was not able to respond. But I am now. So, where are we at today and what are our next steps? We are still very early on in this process as you know. The budget was approved for October 1. October 2nd we begin the process of an RFQ for an architect. That is the first step in any kind of development moving forward. I mentioned the meeting with the architect coming up in two weeks. Ideally we would have liked to have held public meetings with a local community where we are considering a fire station location once we had conceptual drawings done. It's a lot easier to have a conversation about what it 's going to look like, is it going to be noisy and to be able to have those conversations. Obviously, with the article coming out we want to address concerns now and not wait for those drawings to come out and our normal process. So, our -- our goal and what we are going to do moving forward at the prior department is the second week of December -- I don't have a date, time, or location specific yet. It will be communicated out. We will hold a community meeting with the residents of Bear Creek, so we can talk and listen and Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 56 of 68 certainly understand their concerns and hear through those concerns. I would have loved to have had a drawing to talk about, that we could certainly talk about those concerns that they have ahead of our normal process. The other -- the other thing -- and it's the work still to be done and I think this is really important to understand, there is two options right now that we have for land and location. One is Bear Creek and it is in the location we talked about. That location requires a rezone, even if the community where to say, you know what, we changed our mind, we love this idea, it still requires a rezone and for you on Council here you're very well aware of how that process plays out. But for folks here in the audience and listening, there is a very extensive public input process to a rezone application. It goes through P&Z and, then, ultimately to City Council for approval. That is another point in time where we would identify do we have a good marriage here or do we not. So, there is that opportunity there. The other issue that we have with a Bear Creek possibility is we are currently researching and determining if there is a deed issue on that -- on that park and if there is it changes the conversation as well. So, that is an issue that's being researched, that depending on what the answer is it may move us to a different option quickly. So, that's Option A. Option B on Overland Road, again, the commissioners still own that property. They have not sold it. There was a lot of confusion about that as well. I don't know if you have been by that property, but we have had some issues with a developer in the area utilizing our property as a staging location for his equipment and, then, they actually cut a roadway through that property. So, that led a lot of folks to believe, well, they must have sold that, now there is development going on at that site. There is not. So, for clarification we still own the fire station property on Overland Road. If that is the location we go to, that's going to require an annexation to the city, which, again, goes through a very extensive public hearing process and, then, ultimately comes to you at Council for approval, as well as some ACHD special permitting for signalization on a -- on an arterial. So, I hope -- and I'm certainly -- please ask any questions you have. I hope that covered some information to clarify where we are at and to provide clarity on the process. Regardless of which pathway we end up going down we are still a long ways away from any kind of decision being made and there is still extensive community outreach that is going to occur, again, regardless of Overland Road or -- or Stoddard. So, with that I would certainly answer any questions. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Thank you, chief. Mr. Bird. Bird: Mark, having been on -- the liaison when we -- when Earl purchased that land on Overloaded Road, everybody at that time that it was a good site. With your architect now are you having him design a building that would fit at either location, where it goes, because I'm not too sure that I am not at this point in favor of staying at Overland. I will tell you I don't think it's bad for future parks, especially that 77 acre, to plan something out there. In fact, there is a nice little three and a half acre cutoff that would be perfect for a fire station from the deal. But I -- I know the public is going to get to weigh in regardless how we go and I -- and I want to see it done right and I know it will be done right and, Mark, I knew you were coming back and I want to say this -- bear with me. There has been nobody harder on the fire department than me and it started with Kenny as chief, Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 57 of 68 went right through Ron and now you. But, you know what, I -- I respect -- love every one of your men and a lot of them I helped get their jobs early on, but, anyway, if you would relay that to your department, that -- I'm sure there is a whole bunch of them glad to see me leaving, but, I will tell you what, they have got my respect. I thank you. Niemeyer: Councilman Bird, thank you very much. And I will contradict you. There is a whole bunch of folks, especially the ones that have been around a long time that know how dedicated you have been to the city and the fire department and youth athletics and everything else, and there is no glory is seeing you go. We would love to see you stick around a long time. Your wisdom and whether we battle on things or not, I think your wisdom is beyond gold and so certainly there is a great appreciation. We have talked about you at our staff meetings to try and get these younger folks to understand the commitment level that you have given to this city and ho w you have helped move it forward and so we have been honored to be a part of you and -- Bird: Thank you, Mark. Appreciate that. Niemeyer: I would like to get back to your question about station design and land location. We are doing just that. So, we know the dimensions of the land available to us. We know the size of the building, basically the number of bays, all that kind of stuff that we are going to need for this station. That station will fit on either piece of ground, just depends on how you turn for the ingress and egress and all that, but to answer your questi on, we are identifying that for sure. Bird: Madam Mayor, follow up. De Weerd: Uh-huh. Bird: Mark, one question -- and I think I -- I know the answer. We are building this station to receive a truck if needed? Niemeyer: It will have a potential in the future -- Bird: Okay. Niemeyer: -- for it. Bird: But we will have the bay for it? Niemeyer: Yeah. Bird: Okay. Niemeyer: Yeah. We won't have one to start, we will have an engine in there, but as the community grows and -- I just heard about a four story apartment potentially -- as the community grows -- Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 58 of 68 Bird: Okay. Niemeyer: -- there is probably going to be -- hopefully it's long after I'm gone and the next can worry about that and I think there was one other question you had and I just lost it. Oh. It is -- it is public record, so I can talk about this. You mentioned the partnership on the 77 acre park. The rural district is buying that four acre corner piece. That is public record and it's been publicized in the media, so that -- that is a partnership that we will definitely look at in the future. That's what -- Bird: Fantastic. Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions? I think the neighbors came up with some really good questions through your presentation. It looks like you have been tracking those and trying to address them and I believe there is some board members here that may be after your presentation you can chat with them, but we will be following up with those that have reached out, as well as posting on NextDoor, so those that did an e-mail have kind of some of the details that you have outlined and that will be going out tomorrow; correct? Niemeyer: Yes. De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions? Okay. Yeah. It was unfortunate. The article was definitely premature and I think caught us all unaware, because -- yeah, it hadn't come back and there has been no outline of the process. So, now it gets out in front of you and you can get back, address it, and lay out the road map to -- to the -- how people can have a voice and be informed and you said that the public meeting will be the second week -- Niemeyer: Second week in December. We will be working on the daytime location. That announcement I listened into Mike on his public outreach. I know that they said they would extend it out a mile. We will certainly go on a limit -- that public involvement process and certainly the folks in and around that direct area are affected, but we also want to hear from the folks in neighboring communities that this station will serve. So, that process will be the second week of December. De Weerd: So, you will be reaching out to those areas around the Overland location as well? Niemeyer: The first -- yeah -- yes. De Weerd: Okay. Niemeyer: They are all kind of within the same mile perimeter. Yes. De Weerd: Okay. Anything further? We appreciate your update and I know they will appreciate any further opportunity to ask their questions. Okay. Thank you. And thank Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 59 of 68 you for those that have come here for this particular item and those that have tuned into the City Council workshop for this as well. Item 7: Action Items A. Public Hearing Continued from June 6, 2017 for 2017 UDC Text Amendment (H-2017-0044) by City of Meridian Planning Division 1. Request: Text Amendment to Certain Sections of the UDC Pertaining to Definitions; Allowed Uses in all Districts; Specific Use Standards (Home Occupation and Retail Store, Wine and Beer Sales and Servings); Surety Agreements AND Establish New Definitions and Regulations to Allow the Operation of Food and Beverage Products Processing, Minor in the Commercial, Industrial and Traditional Neighborhood Zoning Districts De Weerd: Okay. Under 7-A, Action Items, we have a public hearing that was continued from a June 6th meeting regarding the 2017 UDC text amendment and I will turn this over to Caleb. Hood: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Don't freak out, I'm not going to read all these code changes to you -- De Weerd: Oh, thank you. Hood: So, I -- unless you want me to. De W eerd: No. I -- I won't even ask Council on that one. Hood: Madam Mayor, this -- this item was continued from June 6th. Staff proposed changes just -- just before the June 6th hearing to several different sections of the Unified Development Code, Title 11. Essentially, the three themes that are covered in the UDC text are differentiating between bars and drinking establishments and wineries and breweries and microbreweries, distilleries and those types of things. That line kind of gets blurred with restaurants. So, that's part of what you see in your packet tonight, but I'm not going to spend really any time on that. We covered that on the 6th. The o nly real question that arose about that -- I believe it was Council Woman Milam brought up a question about live music in some of the establishments , like wine bars, and we had at that time proposed to put that as a prohibition in those and we have removed that since. So, that was the only thing, really, that you all had comments on on June 6th and I haven't received any other further public comment on -- again, that theme if you will, differentiating. The second major theme is surety and occupancy requirements. This is your permits out of order. It's actually the last thing in the packet. It's the very last section, talking about, okay, as you go through the plating, a subdivision process, you get the city Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 60 of 68 engineer's signature, you get building permits, you get occupancy, the way that's ordered in code was not chronological, so, really, all we have done is change it to the right order of this, then this, then this, not this and really step two down here and, then, this stuff up here. So, I'm not going to spend a whole lot of time, unless you want to talk about that, but that's the very last section of the packet is talking about surety and occupancy and life safety types of things. Again, nothing substantive in those changes, just a reordering of that information. And, then, the third one is -- did get some play on June 6th and that has to do with home occupations. So, staff collaborated with other city departments -- the legal staff has been busy. I think everybody that's given presentations on their code is -- has -- it's illegal and I will be no exception to that. Emily Kane has been there every step of the way on what you have before you. Building department and code enforcement -- code enforcement is really the ones that -- that brought this to our attention. They were having problems with enforcing businesses that weren't being good neighbors and , essentially, the ones that brought it up to legal saying, hey, we need to address this in the code. So, that's kind of the why -- why we are here. Back before the June hearing, those UDC changes were shared with the UDC focus group, which is largely developers, so we didn't get a lot of feedback as you would expect. Most of them didn't care about these changes, because they don't really affect them and same with the Building Contractors Association of Southwest Idaho, those are our typical folks we -- we share that with and it didn't get much comment. However, just days prior to the June 6th hearing several letters of concern were received from the public. I'm not going to read those again, that's part of the record from June 6th, but we received several letters of concern and in addition to that, during the public hearing several parties testified on this topic, raising concerns and questions with the proposed changes regarding home occupations. So, the Council, again, continued the hearing to this meeting tonight and directed staff to establish a stakeholder group of approximately ten to 15 people to discuss home - based businesses. You also had some discussion -- I'm not going to try to summarize that June 6th meeting, but we talked a little bit about process, standards, fees and maybe a tiered approach for the different levels of home occupations. So, as you directed, we did set up a stakeholder group and we contacted several of the parties that were present for that June 6th meeting and invited them to participate in developing standards. We did make it clear and everyone was on the same page, the intent was to uphold the integrity of residential neighborhoods while still allowing home-based businesses. I'm not going to read to you everybody that was invited, that's in your packet as well. We did have pretty good representation. Not everybody that we invited were able to participate at all the meetings or some of them didn't participate at all in person, but I did keep them in the loop, they were on the distribution e-mail and I shared with them summaries of what we talked about and the changes coming and that type of thing . So, I kept people hopefully in the know of what we were up to. The workgroup did meet three times, once in July, once in August, and once in September in person. I'm not going to, again, summarize everything we talked about in there, but just know that we -- we did review and discuss how the city of Boise treats these home occupations. We -- we came up with a new definition that we will see in code regarding direct sales and, then, we talked about process and enforcement and, you know, really how are we going to -- some of these calculations that we will get into in an minute, how is code enforcement going to be able to actually enforce the code and, then, Section 11-4-3-21, we really spent a lot of time on and I will, Madam Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 61 of 68 Mayor, if it's okay with you, kind of read that section, but it's not -- not overly lengthy, but I do kind of want to walk you through it and, then, the tiered approval process. So, without further adieu I'm going to just go through the proposal you have here -- and, again, I'm not going to touch on all of these, because it's all three of those themes in one, but the first one I do want to call out -- and I already did in kind of that -- those opening remarks is we added a new term for direct sales . The sale, distribution, presentation, demonstration or supply goods directly to consumers from the fabricator or producer of such goods through independent consultants, agents, or contractors. So, we didn't have anything similar. It was basically retail sales is what we would say, so now there is a differentiator between direct sales and retail sales. So, I think that -- that helps a lot in -- in where we are going with this discussion. So, I just wanted to highlight that one. Like I said, I'm not going to read all these, but if you read something on the screen you want to double back on or want me to explain, please, feel free to interrupt or -- and we can -- we can discuss it. We also added to the definition, the first one on here, we modified the term. We had home occupation already. We clarified that a home occupation is an accessory use and that's important, because it clarifies that it's not a retail store. The primary use is as a dwelling. Someone is living there, but you can have as an accessory use a home occupation. So, we clarified that even in the definition of what that is, home occupation and accessory use. So, I think that -- that also kind of helps and sets the stage. Retail sales. We already have definition of a retail store. We added retail sales to, again, clarify the difference between this term and direct sales. And, then, in the allowed uses section we clarified when an accessory use permit or an AUP or a certificate of zoning compliance, a CZC, is required for home occupations and a nonresidential accessory use. So, essentially, what this says -- the first section is if you're -- if you're building a home in this -- in a residential district, all you need is a building permit. You don't need to -- you don't need to go through planning for anything. You did that when you got your plat done. So, that's one. Two is if you are going to operate a home occupation, accessory use, or a family daycare, you do need some approval from Planning. You need to get this accessory use permit. And, then, three just talks about other permitted or nonresidential accessory uses. So, this just kind of, again, clarifies the process going forward. And, then, onto the next sheet. This, again, includes the new definition of direct sales. Here is one item, though I do want to call to your attention and we do have some folks that have commented on the draft that 's out there right now. There was an error or a scrivener's error in this. This direct sales should have a one after it. As we will talk about in Section 11-4-3-21, direct sales is a -- essentially the same as a type of home occupation accessory use. So, the things that make you an accessories home occupation, we also want to apply to direct sales. So, footnote number one, meeting there is specific use standards that you need to apply -- comply with to be a direct sales person, they are exactly the same as -- as those that apply for any other home occupation, but there should be a little one, a footnote here, that says you need to comply with those specific use standards and, again, I will spend a little bit of time on those here in just a second. This is the same thing, just for commercial districts. So, the same listing as I did here, this is just in the commercial districts. I'm going to -- unless there is any questions on these -- this is just, again, saying where you can do the various uses in the various zones. I didn't really have anything on this page to highlight to call to your attention. And, then, traditional neighborhood districts. So, just to quickly call out -- so, daycares are Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 62 of 68 really a similar -- a similar premise; right? Someone is living there, but they are also running a business. So, they are watching kids, a daycare out of their home. So, a lot of what you see matches up -- marries up with what you're going to see for home occupation, accessory use, is it just makes sense. You have a lot of the same concerns with parking, noise, and those types of things. So, for that consistency we added some things in here that in no way shall a daycare emit smoke, dust, odors, those types of things. It should look and feel and smell like a home. It shouldn't look and feel and smell like a business. So, that's really just an emphasis there and that reemphasizing -- and this is -- currently already required, but this is just reemphasizing if you are going to open up a daycare in a home you must have a neighborhood meeting with your neighbors and discuss that with them before applying to the city. So, this is more explicit. And, then, finally, the -- the headliner here, if you will, is the one we spent most of our time on. I do want to just point out as I run through this -- this is meant to be read in concert with each other. You can't just look at one of the standards without -- you can't cover one thought for everything in one. One section of this or subsection covers one concern, the other covers another, but when you read it all together it gives you the full picture of the intent of the code. So, just Section A here. Again, it the same -- this is -- a neighborhood meeting is required for accessory use permits where you are having customer -- or actually not customer or clients -- where you are having students or giving lessons, that is where we ended up drawing the line. Clients and customers and students -- it really is, from code enforcement -- what we heard a lot back from them was music lessons, yoga studios, those types of things where there is students coming or they are giving lessons to people, those are the ones that seem to be the most problematic for adjacent neighbors. So, where that's the case you would need to have -- go through a similar process to a daycare and have the -- the neighborhood meeting with your -- with everyone within a certain distance of the residence and we drew that line at seven or more students at one time. So, you can have six or fewer and you wouldn't -- you wouldn't trigger that upper tier, that most intense level where you have to go through that process. But when you have seven or more students, that's the trigger. It's -- again, it's largely based on our daycare standards, six or fewer, seven to 12, 12 or more. So, that's -- that's kind of that first subsection there. B and C kind of go together. This -- this clarifies the types of uses that are appropriate or not appropriate as a home occupation accessory use. It's not inclusive. It says included, but not limited to, but if you look at the very bottom of C-8, the director does have some discretion. So, this isn't comprehensive of everything that may be -- you know, someone could dream up running a type of business out of their home, but it does give you a flavor of the types of uses that we are looking for and what we are not looking for. Basically, anything to do with vehicles we are not looking for you to do out of your home . Again, here are the ones that -- that are allowed as an accessory use to the home and ones where we are likely to deny you for doing it out of your home. So, again, we spent quite a bit of time coming up with and hashing, you know, what's appropriate, what isn't appropriate and, again, this is -- this is what the group agreed to at least thus far. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 63 of 68 Milam: Caleb, I'm curious about pet boarding and if there is a standard to pet boarding or just no pet boarding, because there might be people who will watch your pet for, you know, ten bucks a day or whatever. That's not allowed or only if you have more than so many animals? So -- Hood: So, Madam Mayor, Council Woman Milam, I don't think that came up in our discussions. I will -- again, let's go through this and see if maybe -- if maybe you can keep that in your mind as we are running through this. Oh, that would prohibit or allow somebody to do that. I don't -- we didn't go through that scenario. I don't think it's been an issue for code enforcement -- that they brought up anyway. So, again, it doesn't -- just because it's not listed under B doesn't mean you can't do it, but those are, again, sample uses. So, we will read the rest of these and go, oh, well, it's going be smelly, so if we get complaints about smell, because you have got 15 kennels there -- Milam: It's prohibited. Hood: Sorry? Milam: It's listed as prohibited. Hood: It is. I'm sorry, we didn't talk about that too much. But, you're right, 6-C. Yeah. We didn't spend too much time on discussing that. Honestly, I don't know if that was a carryover from current code -- so, I'm sorry, I didn't even realize it was listed there as prohibited. But that is -- didn't get a lot of discussion in our group. Anything else on kind of the first couple sections thus far? I will move on then. D is pretty much the same. Again, it should -- it should still look like a house. E -- the new E, which was largely Section B before, this one I wanted to just point out we had quite a bit of discussion about this, too. On the books right now it's 25 percent of the overall living area. So, the garage was excluded from what you could use currently. We landed on ten percent of the overall dwelling. So, the garage can be part of your business, but it's capped in the overall footprint, if you will, of your dwelling at ten percent of that for your -- for your business. And, again, we spent a lot of time, you know, going through what that looks like, how we would measure that, you know, what happens if someone is at 11 percent, you know, there is -- and the garage definitely was a big -- big part of that discussion. But, you know, what you see on the screen is what we all kind of agreed to try and see how it works . You know, that goes for, I guess, all of this code, we will try it and see how it works and if we think -- see that there is flaws in it, we can bring it back. The last section on here -- again, this is largely the same as -- as you -- as currently on the books. It does include a detached garage or detached accessory structure, just to clarify that, that they aren't part of where you can store your goods or operate a business out of. So, I'm going to move to the next portion of this same section. Again, this is -- this is the same standards we currently have just with some -- some clarification on the language. But the next three sections are largely the same. You can read it there. The other thing that I will just point out is when we brought this to you originally we had different standards for single family and multi-family. We actually prohibited these in multi-family projects and through that discussion we decided to treat them the same . Single family, multi-family, they are both Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 64 of 68 dwelling units. Parking is accommodated for. Shouldn't differentiate between where somebody -- you know, if they are in an apartment, it doesn't matter, home, the same standards apply, but allowing home occupations out of both single family and multi-family projects. So, you don't really see that here, but that was in our first draft. And, then, H that we struck out is actually covered in the B and C above that we talked about in direct sales -- with adding direct sales and same with K, it's covered above. So, I think that's kind of the -- the overview that I had. I will just continue to scroll through here. Again, a lot more of this was -- had to do with, you know, breweries and -- and those types of things. Oh, I did have one more thing that I wanted -- that I wanted to call to your attention and, then, we will need to have some more discussion on it. The tiering, the different levels of accessories uses. So, today we -- we technically do have three different levels, if you will, but we treat -- the way we process them is a little bit different for accessory use, home occupations that don't have customers or clients . Right now it's just an over- the- counter paper that someone signs. They basically disclosed to Planning that they are running a business out of their house. We don't have any way to deny that, revoke it, to do anything and that's, again, largely why code enforcement brought this to legal was to say this paper doesn't do us any good, because there is nothing to take away. They just told you they are doing something and if they are in violation we don't have any way to -- to enforce that. So, we are still -- we still have that administrative level for these -- for homeowners, business owners, that don't have students or are providing instruction, but we don't have a fee for that and so that's one of the things we will need to talk about a little bit. Just as a point of reference, the daycare -- accessory use daycares and accessory use for home occupations with customers or clients , those are typically -- we charge 160 dollars right now and we talked about this in June -- which takes about three hours of staff time to walk somebody through that process from when they walk in saying, hey, I want to do this and sitting down with them and kind of walking through that process, to writing the letters, to sending out notices through the clerk's office and those types of things, it's about three hours of staff time and some hard costs. This new level -- I don't envision it taking anywhere near that amount of time. Just as a frame of reference, some of the other letters we do, we charge 53 dollars. I would say something like that will cover our staff time. What I would propose is we try this out and we will document how much time it takes us to process these and, then, as we do an update to the fee schedule -- the city wide fee schedule we have now, we will bring that to Counc il and say, hey, we need to add a fee for these in the future. I don't remember the timing of that. I didn't talk with Cortni before this to see when the -- the citywide fee schedule is going to be amended, but whatever that -- six months or nine months or whatever, we will process these for that amount of time and say, hey, on average it's taking us 30 minutes, we think we should charge a 25 dollar fee or whatever to recoup our cost. So -- but there would be those -- those three different levels, some probably administrative fee. The one that requires the notice to people within 300 feet, the kind of higher level and, then, daycares are at that same level. So, that was the last thing that I -- I think I wanted to point out to you and here is the -- as I mentioned, the last slide had to do with surety agreements, the process. If you look, the language is largely the same, it's just some of them moved up, some of them move down, so -- I do -- just before I close, Madam Mayor, I do want to make reference -- we did receive some additional public comment today. The folks that I'm aware of we did receive a petition from some homeowners in the Bear Creek Subdivision Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 65 of 68 on Hibernation Place, with some concerns. That should be in your packet. I'm not going to run through that. There are -- there are some neighbors -- some residents that signed up with concerns on that petition. We also received e-mails from -- and I talked to Whitney Combs, who is the legal administrator for AIM Companies out of Nampa, talked to her last week or the week before, shared this information. We received a letter from her and they are in favor of the proposed changes, particularly allowing direct sales in residential districts and I got real similar e-mails -- we received real similar e-mails from Chris Robertson, Joyce Jensen and Sergio Fong, all within AIM Companies. Eric Ritter and Carolyn Smith, two of our members, were here earlier, but I think we -- they were here at 3:00 o'clock and we scared them away. So, it's unfortunate, but I do -- you know, hopefully, they listened to this. I do appreciate their involvement in this. We did -- it's my understanding the clerk said he received a letter, an e-mail from Scentsy's legal counsel supporting these changes as well. And, again, Eric Ritter represents Scentsy as well and was very faithful in attending this meeting. I don't know for sure if he's got any concerns, but he did not voice any of those to me and we shared the se several weeks ago asking for their -- for any comments that the working group had. So, I assume -- big assumption there, but I assume that most people are satisfied with the changes here. So, with that, Madam Mayor, I would stand for any questions you have. Oh, no, I wouldn't. One more thing. Sorry. It's a continued public hearing. I'm not asking you to act tonight. We just -- we do want to allow people some more time to digest this. If you're so inclined -- I mean that's your prerogative I guess. Staff would recommend -- you're meeting next Tuesday is -- there is a pretty high profile project on that. I don't -- I think probably better off that first meeting in December, allow a couple three weeks for people to fully consider the changes here and attend. So, if you're agreeable, December 5th. We could also do the 28th of November if you wanted to do something in between. I know you have another high profile project down in south Meridian on that agenda, so up to you. I'm not asking for action tonight, but, again, that's -- that's your discretion, so -- now thank you. De Weerd: Are you sure? Hood: Pretty sure. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Okay. Is there anyone signed up to testify? Coles: Madam Mayor, Caleb mentioned Eric Ritter had signed up in favor, not wishing to testify. Carolyn Smith, also in favor, not wishing to testify. And Tabb -- Tabb Compton in favor, not wishing to testify. That was all the sign-ups. De Weerd: Is there anyone who wishes to comment on this item? Okay. Bird: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 66 of 68 De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Seeing that no public wants to testify and the Council evidently needs no deal, I move we close the public hearing on 2017-0044. I thought it was a public hearing? De Weerd: I have a motion to close the public hearing. Do I have a second? Okay. Is there a desire to continue this? To discuss it? To do anything? Milam: Madam Mayor, what was Caleb's -- De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Caleb, what was your recommendation? Hood: Madam Mayor, Council Woman Milam, I would recommend that you leave the hearing open until December 5th or -- or November 28th, to just make sure -- again, I'm pretty confident, I have talked to some folks, I think we are on the right track here, but just in case -- and, again, there was one change that -- you know, to the direct sales. I do want to add that footnote there to direct sales. It says, hey, the -- that Section 11-4-3-21, these standards still apply to you, too. You need to be a good neighbor while you do sales. That's my recommendation. But -- Nary: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, we -- we have discussed this a little bit internally -- because there is a long gap between June and now, there have been some people that have been very actively involved . Mr. Ritter from Scentsy, as well as some others, but there was a lot of other people that appeared in June and although it was set over at that time, I don't know the public's sense of this particular change. Again, there has been a number of changes and so it was our suggestion that maybe using some of our outreach methods that we have developed since June, like NextDoor, to at least get it out there and see if there is -- so that we are not surprised again by the public's reaction to this. We think we have got it right this time, but we thought it might be best and the Council would feel a little more comfortable if we gave it one more shot. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: And, Caleb, I guess I would like a little bit more further information about the pet boarding. I do know somebody who that would directly affect and if that was already part of the law or if that's something new that was added and, you know, they haven't got any complaints from their neighbors, I don't want to put them in a position where they are now doing something that's against regulation. Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 67 of 68 Hood: Madam Mayor. I can certainly ask Code Enforcement to -- to attend and see if that's been a problem. Again, I just don't recall us really talking about that. So, I'm -- yeah. There it is, but I don't remember really see it, talking about it. Milam: I guess the only reason I noticed it is because I know somebody that does that, so -- De Weerd: Okay. So, Council, do you want to set this out to the 28th or the December 5th? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we continue the public hearing on the H-2017-0044 to December 5th, 2017. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion to continue this until December 5th. All those favorite say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Item 8: Future Meeting Topics De Weerd: Okay. Thank you very much. Council, under future meeting topics, I do have a couple of events. Certainly the firefighter recruit academy graduation that's this Friday night at 6:00 p.m. and, believe it or not, Christmas is coming, whether you are ready or not. The Parks Department is. They are hosting the Winter Lights Parade on Friday, December 1st. It starts at 6:30. I don't know if you have all gotten a hold of April, but we need you there by 6:00. We do have little Santa helpers to pass out candy. Candy cane fun run is also on Friday. It starts at 6:25 -- 6:25? Before the parade. Okay. Twilight Christmas Market is December 7th, noon to 8:00. Children's Winterland Festival December 9th from 10:00 to 3:00. And downtown business decorating contest throughout December. So, we have a lot in store for the holidays. Any other topics under this item? Item 9: Amended Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(d): To consider records that are exempt from disclosure as provided in chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code and 74-206(1)(c): To acquire an interest in real property which is not owned by a public agency. De Weerd: If not, I would entertain a motion to adjourn into Executive Session on Item 9. Bird: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council Workshop November 14, 2017 Page 68 of 68 De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we go into Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(c),(1)(d). Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn into Executive Session. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, call roll. Roll call: Bird, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, absent; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (7:02 p.m. to 8:22 p.m.) De Weerd: I would entertain a motion to come out of Executive Session. Bird: So moved. Milam: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES, TWO ABSENT. De Weerd: Do I have a motion to adjourn? Bird: So moved. Milam: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor? MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:22 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) W7 MAYOR Y DE WEERD DA E APPROVED ATTE ELSE ERK Qo�PSgD AUGUST' VOA �`oow 2 ('ity of to�No `sem SEAL the Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approval of PO # 18-01 1 1 for E. Pine Avenue Landscaping and Improvements to Ada County Highway District for the Not -to - Exceed amount of $415,755.00. This Purchase Order is issued in conjunction with the Cost Share Permit approved by Council 09/27/17. MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Gity of Meridian Purchasing Dept. Memo To: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk, From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager GG: Mike Barton, Steve Siddoway Date;, 11107117 Re: November 14th City Council Meeting Agenda ltem The Purchasing Department, on behalf of the Parks Department, respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the November 14th City Council Consent Agenda for Council's consideration. Approval of PO # 18-0111 for E. Pine Avenue Landscaping and lmprovements to Ada County Highway District for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $415,755.00. This Purchase Order is issued in conjunction with the Cost Share Permit approved by Council 09127117 . Recommended Council Action: Approval of PO#18-0lll and authorize the Purchasing Manager to sign the Not-To-Exceed amount of $415,755.00 Thank you for your consideration . Page 1 ?rl,{,ID ID HO CITY OI,'MERID 33 EAST BROAD MERIDIAN, ID 83642 (208) 888-4433 Vendor Address: PUfchase Order i1t7t2o1t Attention: t\,4ikeBarton 18-0111 AVU. Billing Address: Shipping Address: Attn: Finance 33 E Broadway Ave [4eridian, lD 83642 33 E. Broadway Ave Ste. 206 Meridian, lD 83642 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 3775 ADAMS ST. GARDEN C|TY tD 83714-6447 Description E Pine Ave Landscaping and lmprovements Cost Share/pass thru to l\,4DC Shipping Method: FOB: NiA N/A Total dolla r 415755.00 '1.00 415.755.00 Purchase Order Total:$415,755.00 Purchasing Manager: Special lnstructions Contract PO with ACHD per Cost Share permit approvedgl27llT by Council for E Pine Ave Landscaping and lmprovemenls - pass through to MDC. Not-to-Exceed $415,755.00. 01-5200-93401-10667.b Case # 58244 Unit Quantity Unit Price &(E IAN CITY OF MERIDIAN Puachallng Ooparlmont 33 E EROADWAY AVE, STE 106 MERIDIAN. ID 8iI642 TEU (208) 489-0417 FA* (Z)€) 887-4813 @ CIrY OF MEBIOIAN Palkws and Flecrealion 912512017 lS BUDGET Ai/GNDIVIENT REQI IBED? No CASE MANAGEMENT TI NO. 5gz4 ADA County Highway District 3775 Adams Street Garden City, lD 83714 DATE OF REOUEST AVAILABLE BUI'GET AUOUNT $415,755.00 Purchase Requisition PRoJECT MANAGER HEPAID TERMSPAYMENTTEFMS NET 30 F.O.B. DESTINATION Mike Barlon REOUESTOR Mike Baion PBOJECTNAME: Pine Ave Cost Share '|'1 $5200 93401 /oL67.b $ 41s,7s5.00 $ $ $ $ b $ D $ $ AITTFT]Al7E D DEP^fiIrI€J 15 755.00 (z I Irt rl€f l2€o cortrJot SGMn nE ! lFv.,r NOTES: Council Approval Oate: 1U112o17 II-II-- IIEII-- ACCOUNTING CODES FUND TOTAL AMOUNT Descri tion of Purchase IIII - IIrI Ouanlily and Pricing II-T I TI-r-rr-- EXPENSE OR PROJECT i GL ACCOUNT ,, CO},4I.4ITI.IENT ,, DEPT CODE PART NUMBER / DESCBIPTION I COMMITMENT NAI,'IE / TASK OFDER / CONTRACT / PBOJECT DESCRIPTION OTY UNIT UNIT PRICE LT - I SUGGESTEO VENDOR PUeariASa anDan l.'.:f, -rEn l.i!Si,\Fr,i.tii Crli!! iijr.,SrDES PnCKllla aL LF5 CAniCi, S &rD tU Fi',t:SF 0il]:rti ti!lnT E0 19 lHt! cn!En I -_____r-_-_|-- City Of Ueridian Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Statement Rev and Exp Karen 01 - C€n€ral turrd 5200-Parka-Adlilt F ton\ l0 / 1 / 2O1'l Through 9/30/2018 Budget lrlth Amendment s Current Yea! Actuaf Budget Remaining 93406 c apital Outlay Streetscape rrrrgation landscaping Pine Avenue Cost Share Carryforward Total Capital Outlay 10667.b Carryforward 0.00 0.00 415,755.00 15, 622 .32 0.00 491,311 .32 DEPT EXPENDITURES TOTAL EXPENDITURES 491 311 .32 0.00 491 311 .32 0.00 497 311.32 Date: 1ol 31/ 17 0,1.1?:02 Pu 415,755.00 15-522,32 a91.311 -32 491,37'7.3? ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COST SHARE PER]I,IIT.;ffi;r, 0"rt"no*Tddo *oui* #L 3775 A&ms Street Garden City ldaho 83714 Phone (208) 387-6280 Facsimile (208) 387-6289 ACHD Contact Pcrson: Name: Cody Homan 3775 Adams Street Garden City ldaho 83714 Phone: (208) 387-6109 ray'L-/ - Z7 ,Date of Permlt: 20t7 ACHD Projcct No.r 815025 Permit No.:016 Crpltallzed lerms thsa rre trot defined in thls Permlt shlll hrve thr meanlngs glven to them ln the ACHD Cost Share Ordlnence No. 215. tls to: C of Meridian'l'his Contact Person:t,a Jared Hale Engineering, Project Manager 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho E3642 33 E. Broadway Ave. Mcridiaq Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 489-0370 Email: j hale@mesidjsrc illrery Pine Avenue, Meridian Road to Locust Grove Road, ACHD Project #815025, as depicted in the 95% plans attachcd hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Name/Location of ACHD Road ProJect: Approvcd Non-Trrnrportrdon Componetrh: Pursuent to this Permit, ACHD authorizes, an4 as a condition of issuing this Pennit, requires, the following Non-Transportation Components: I I. PAR'I]\iIiRIN(; A(JEI\('Y IN I.'ORMA'I'I()\ ACHD authorizes and requires and trees between approximate ststions II. ROA D PRO,IEC'T AN D APPROVID i\O\-'TRANSP0R'I'ATION CO]TIPON }: N'I'S 00+40 and and the maintenance of treatments that are not the design and constnrctioD of the sod, irrigation systern, $avel, or rock within the public right-of-way installed with the ACHD Project over the entire Project length approvcd pursuant to this Permit (the "Permanent Landscrplng").. (2) Dssiqn. Construction. and Peroetual Maintenance of Historic Strect Liehts within the fu8ht- of-Wav. as dgrictpd on Exhibit A. ACHD authorizes and requires the design, construction, Bnd perpetual maintcnance of historic street lights (the "Historlc Lighting") within the right-of-way between stations 00+40 and 24+00. (3) Construction of Additional Sidewalk within the Riqht-of-Wav. as depicted on Exhibit A. ACHD authorizes and requires the construction ofnew sidewalk on the north side of Pine Ave within the right-of-way between approximat€ stations 00+40 and 06+60, 07+60 and 09+00. 14+00 and 20+60, 2E+60 and 4&f30, and 43+50 and 46+40; on the south side of Pine Ave within the right-of-way between approxim8te stations 06+00 8nd 27+00, and 37+40 and 50+00i and additional sidewalk width and associated handrails on thc Dorth side ofPine Ave within the right-of-way bctween approximate stations 06+60 and 07+60, 09+00 and 14+00, and 20+60 and 28+60 (the' Addltlonal sldewalk"). (4) Constnrction of New On-Street Parking within the Right-of-Way. as dcpicted on Exhibit A. ACHD authorizes and requires the constnrction ofadditional pavement for on-street parking (the "New Parklng") within the right-of-way between approximate stations 24+00 and 27+20. (5) Conskuction of Additional Bridge Leneth and Requested Pedestrian Railine within the Riehl-of-Way at the Bridge at Five Mile Creek. as deoicted on Exhibit A. ACHD authorizes and requires the construction of additional bridge length and requested pedestrian railing (the "Bridge Addldons") within the right-of-way berween approximate stations 35+00 and 37+00. In accordance with Ordinance 215, the foregoing Permanent Landscaping, Historic Lighting, Additional Sidewalk, New Parking, and Bridge Additions are rcfcred to hercin as the 'Non- Transportation Components." Condltlons of ecqulsldon/contrlbutlon of real property by Partnerlng Agency rnd/or relmbursement to ACHD by Psrtnerlng Agency for acquisltion of real property: ACHD has alrcady acquired or is in the process of acquiring right-of-way adequate for the Non- Transportation Components. Therefore, thc acquisition of real property is not required of Partnering Agency. Partnering Agency shall reimburse ACHD for the cost of the additional right-of-way nccessary to incorporate the Non-Transportation components into the Road projcct, including, but not limited to, additional sidewalk width. The parcels in the dcsign plans thai the lartnerils Agency shall reimburse some or all of the cost of the additional right-of-way are Parcclo l, 3,4,6,7,ll, 12, 16, 17, 18,21, 23,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,15,39,46,41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 5 l, 53, 56, 58, 60, 6 l, 63, and 64. 2 I I I I I l 1il. ACQUTSTTIO\ ()ts RTGIIT-OF-1I',A1 Party relponslble for obtalnlng plane/deslgn for Non-Trrnsportsdon Components: Partnering Agency shall be responsible for obtaining approval of the planVdesigns of the Non- Transportation Components, which shall consist of designs for the Permancnt Landscaping and Historic Lighting described in Section II. If Partnerlng Agency is responsible for provlding plans/designs, deadline for submltting plans/designs to ACHD for approval: Partnering Agency shall submit the plans/designs of the Non-Transponation Components and receive approval from ACHD as to the plans/designs prior to installation. Addiliondl co,ditions: All designs/plans submltted by Partnering Agency will comply with (i) established englneeing slandards, includlng lhe ldaho Standards lor Public Works Construction (lSPllrC); (ii) the American Association of State Hlghway and Transporlation Affciab ('AASHTO"); (iii) the Cost-Share Ordinancc No. 215; (iu) all adopled ACHD rules, regulations, and policies; and (v) all state and federal laws. No designs shall be considered linol utltl they are approved in writing by ACHD. Any modificatlons to the deadlines sel lorlh above must be approved in writing by ACHD. By approving such destgnslplans, ACHD asumes no responsibility lor any deJiciencies or inadequacies in the design or const ltcrion of lhe Non-Tmnsportalion Componenls. Allocation of design costs for Non-Transportation Components (including, if epplicable, any credlts provlded to Partnerlng Agency and appllcatlon of any federal fundlng) and tlme for relmbursement, lf spplicable: Partnering Agency shall not be responsible for the design costs for the Non-Transportation Componcnts incurred by ACHD. Partnering Agency shall reccivc no credits in connection with the design costs for the Non-Transportation Components, Upon submission of the plans/designs of the Non-Transportation Components by_ Parhering Agency and approval by ACHD, ACHD shall proceed with conssuction; provided, however, tfrit ebHn shail not insiall trces or other plants besides sod. Parmering Agency shall complete installation oftrees in accordance with the approved planVdesigns' le) nletederlPartnrovedtoACHT)cbwork byconstructlonofbycompappDescriptlon toandssedattachtodloreferadditiondesignplanescription,(In(ifAgency applicab at timce ofre,l conot thIfansdmpletedesignplans bcAllCH!)shnd ellwrltintnlrcbyapprovcd will not allow liens to altach toA dd i tional conditions : thk Permlt as f,xhlblts, lf applicable. lssuance of thk Pcrmit, they must incorporated into thls Permit') 3 IV. DESI(;N OT }-()N-I'RANSPOR'I'A'II0N COilIPONf,NT'S I I v" coNS'rRt ('ilo\ ()l'ti()N{ RArisPoR'l'.{I I()N ('0}lP0l\llYl'S improvenenrs, or othor proper,y of ACHD as o result ol any labor pedormed or materlals rupplled tn conneclion with the construction ol the Non-Transporlalion Components. (2) Parlneing Agency shall bc rvsponsible lor oblaining all permits requircd by ACIID in cotneclion wilh any constructton of lhe Non- Tmnsporlarion Conponenls. (3) Pannering Agenc'!'s construclion shall not ncgatlvcly tnpacl A('HD's construction of rhe Trsnsporlalion Componenls or tICHD's Road Proiecl schedule in any wal'. Q.) Any aDr€ndment to lhe designs ond plans must be opproved i,t wrlting b' ACllD. (5) All conslrltclion of he Non-frdnspoflation Componc ls shsll hc tu accordance l*ilh the designs/plats approved by ACHD. (6) All construction bS, Partnerlng Agcncy *ill compls, *'ith (i) urablished engi eering sran.latds, including the ldaho Standords for Public Workt Constructioi (lSPlyC); (it) lhe A erlca AEroclalion a! Slale ltlghhsl and fro sportation Otficials ("AASHTO"): (ill) the Cost-Share Ordinance No. 215: (lil oll adopted ACHD rules, rcgulations, and policles; and (v) all state and lederal laws. If Prrtnerlng Agency ls responsible for all or a part of the conrtructlon of the Non- Tmnrportatlon Components; s. Dste for submitdng Prrtnering Agency's contractors end engineers to ACflD for apprrova!: Not applicable due to the naturc ofthe construction. b. Date for submitting Prrtnerlng Agency's contrrctors' and englneers' estlmstes to ACIID for rpprovrL Not spplicable due to the nature ofthe construction. c. Datc for submitting Partoering Agency's contractorr' 8nd €nganeers' contrrcls to ACHD for spprovrlr Not applicablc due to thc naturc of the construction. Any modlflcations to the dcadlines set forth above must be approved in wrltlng by ACHD. Allocstion of construction costs for Non-Transportation Components, reconstructlon cost! of Transporlation Components necessitated by the incorporf,llon of Non-Transportltlon Component3 lnto the Road ProJect, ACHD construction, malntenance, admlnlstration, and oycrrun eosls (lncludlng, lf appliceble, sny credits provided to Partnering Agency and applleation of any federal fundlng), and tlme for relmbursement, lf appllcablet Partnering Agcncy shall be solely responsible for all construction costs ol the Non- Transportation Components, whether ACHD or Partnering Agency performs such constnrction. Partnering Agency shall reccive no credits in connection with the construction of the Non- Transportation Components. If ACHD performs the construction of the Non-Transportation Components, thcn Parrnering Agency shall reimburse ACHD for the actual cost ofall materials used, the oost of the relocation of any utilities necessitsted by the Non-Transportalion Componcnts, and any othel costs associatod with the oonstrucrion aDd install&tion of the Non- Transportation Components. Payrncnt by Partnering Agcncy shall bc mads to ACHD within 30 days following submission of an invoicc by ACHD to partnering Agcncy identifying such charges. utilities to be completed by Partnering Agency (ifany):Relocation of l ib atron ri rvithconnectron I rtnPa ne I'I c struc rh (rtl 'l'll j ot(i,nO oCgenv It'lp ponents 1l bengAgevlclforchcrelocIli I)0 !l tl thc ntlacem 4 I I incorpontion, or constnrction of the Non-Transportation Components. If ACHD constructs the Non-Transportation Components, Partsrering Agency will be solely responsible for the cost of the relocation ofany such utilities. The buf&r area between sidewalk and vertical curb shall be designed so as to prevent storm water frorn accumulating and ponding in the buffer area. Additional condltions: Upn o determination by ACHD that the irtcorpo,ation lnto the Road Project of Partnerlttg lgency's Nan-Truniportation Componenls will how an adverse elfed on slorm water quantity or quallty, Ponneing Ageacy shall be solely responsible lor either mitigating or funding the mitigotion olany such adverse ellects in a means determined by or acceptable to ACHD. Storm wrter provislons (lf appllcoble): At this time, ACHD's schedule for completion of the Transponation Components of the Road Project completion is unknown, but estimated to be September 2018. The deadline for Partnering Agcncy's complction of the Non-Transportation Components is upon substantial completion ofthe Road Project. Schedule for completion of Road Project: Maintenance requirements of Non-Transportrtion Components by Partnerlng Agency: Partnering Agency shall be, and is hereby, granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to maintain, repair, and replace the Permanent Landscaping and Historic Lighting, subject to the provisioos of t}is Permit and during the term of this Permil. ACHD shall maintain, repair, and replace the Additional Sidewalk, New Parking, and Bridge Additions. Partnedng Agency shall cause the Permanent landscaping and Historic Lighting to be operated and maiotained in good functioning order during the term of this Permit, in accordance with applicable law, the approved designs/plans, Partnering Agency's landscape and irrigation stardards and specifications, and industry standards' This obligation includes, without limitation, grass and lawo care, pruning or replacement of gravel, trees, and shrubs, clcan-up of titter and debris, weed rcmoval, and application for shrubs, trees, and groundcovet, as applicable. Any replacement and/or installation by Partnering Agency ofadditional improvements 6hall be accomplished in accordance with designs, plans, and specificstions approved in advance and in writing by ACHD, in its discretion, and as required to sstisfy applicable laws, its policies, and good argineering and landscaping practices. A ddi t ion a I c on d it ions : l. This Permir does not extend lo Parheing Agency the rtght to use any pan ofthe ACHD Road Proiect are| to the ex,cluslon ol ACHD lor any use wiahtn its iuisdiclion, authorlly, and discretion or o! othen to lar,.the e\le, autlrorized 5 }.I. MAINTF.NANCE O}' NO\.'I'RAI\S POR'I'-\'I'I0N (]OM PO]t.i ENI'S 2. In accessing any parl of the Road Project that has been accepled as on open public htghway (as lhe term "highway" is delined in ldaho Code Section 40-109(5)), Parlnering Agency's aulhorized use is subJect to the rlghts ofthe public lo use lhe Nghway. i, The ights ganted hereunder are subject to atd subordinate to the righls oI holdeB of eascrie ts of records and the statutory rlghls ofutilities to we lhe ight-oI-noy. 4. This Perait does nol preclude or impede lhe ability of ACHD lo enler inlo or grdnt easemenls or Iicense agreemenls allowing lhird parties lo access the Road Project area, or the ability of ACHD lo redesign, reconsiact, relocate, maintain, and i prove ,he Road ProJect and righl-ofway as il detemines necessaryt in its sole dLicrction. 5. ln consideralion of the license granted by this Permil, Parlneing Agenq etprexly covena s and agrees thal lhe license granted herein is temporary and merely a permisslve use of the ACHD righl-of- uray pursuanl lo the tems ol this Pernit. Partnering Agency assumes lhe risk that the license grunted herein may be lermirured before Portneing Agency has realized the economic beaeft o! the cost of inslalling, constructing, repairlng, o naintaining lhe Non-Tra$porlalion Componeats, and by slgnlng and accepting this Pcrmit, Portnering Agency hereby walves and eslops itse(fron asserllng anl claim, including damages or reinbur'tefienl lhq, lhe license is in anl way irretocable because Parlaering Agency has expended funds on lhe Noa-Transporlation ComponeRls and the Permit has not been in eJfecl lor a peiod sn$clent {or Parrnering Agenq- to realize the economic beaefit from such expenditures, 6. ln lhe evenl Parlnerlng Agency lails lo replace, reryir, mahttain, and care for the Pennsnent landscaping and/or Histoic Lighting, ACHD shall have the following remedles in additlon to any other recovery ln law or ln equity, provlded thal ACHD frsl gives Partnering Agency 3A days' notlce and Parlnering Agenqt fails to remedy such lailure: (i) ACHD may revoke this Pernit; (ii) ACHD may replace, maintain, and/or care lor the relewnt Non-Transportation Components, and Partnerhrg Agency shall reimhune ICHD fully tor all associoted costs; (iii) ACHD nay remove, alter, redesign, or reconstruct the relevanl Not-fransportolion Components or any part of tlrc ACHD Road Project (including without limitation the right-of-way), or in the case ol landscaping, replace the Non- Transportation Components with hardscape. and Partnering Agency shall reimburse ACHD fully lor all associated costs; ond (iu) ACHD nay reluse to issue anl lurther Cost Share Permits or any orher pennits lor fature lCHD Road Projects until Parrneting Agency complies wilh lhe conditions olthe Pernit. ln addilion, in lhe evenl of an emergency caused by Porlnering trgenty's lailure to perform required. malnle once, ACHD na.v inmediately perlorn anlt and all emergency repairs or take othet meosures in conneclton with an emergency, and Parlnering lgency shall reinburse ACHD fully for all $saciated coJrs. Perpetual, until terminated or revoked pursuant to the provisions ofthis permit. Term of Permit: nationUpon Partnering directed (i Transportati Permi term or revoca on rhof s Pemri rh ACof HDt.upon request Agen cy asclthcr ACHD remo th Nc onby on Compromptl)v andponents threstore e underl toarea at east the ndco tlon as theof ofdate this 6 vtlTrRu and restoring all portions of ACHD's right-of-way and personal property, if any, that are damaged during such removal activities; or (ii) reimburse ACHD for its cost of redesigning, replacing and/or reconstructing the right-of-way underllng the Non-Transportation Components. Any portion of the Non-Transportation Components that remain in ACHD right- of-way 90 days after the termination or revocation of this Permit shall be deemed abandoned, and ACHD shall have the right lo removc them or redesign, replace, and reconstruct the right-of- way undorlying them and charge all costs to Partnering Agency. This Permit provides thc terms upon which the incorporation of the Non-Transporlation Componcnts into the Road Project are approved. Addltlonal provlslons: l. This Permit is issued conditioncd upon Partncriog Agcncy's compliancc with ACHD'S Cost Share Ordinance No.215 and all certifications made by Parmering Agency pursuant to this Pcrmir. 2. This Permit is subject to tbe provisions of state and fedmal law and ACHD's Cost Shars Ordinance No. 215, in effect as of the datc of issuancc of this Permit (the "Applicabte Lad'). tn thc evcnt ofany conflict bctwecn this Permit and Applicablc Law, Applicablc Law shall govcm. ln the cvent that any part ofthe obtigations of Partncring Agency or ofACHD in conncction with thc Rosd Project are dctcrmincd to bc illcgal or uncnforccabtc by a court of compclcnt jurisdiction, thc rornaining obligations of Partnering Agcncy sct forlh in this Pcrmit shall still bc applicable. Future amendmeDts and r€stalemeats of the Cost Share Ordinance shall not bc sppticablc to this Pcrmit. l If any portion of the ACHD Road Project (inctuding without limiration any portion ofthe righl' of-way) is domaged as a result of Partnering Agcncy's action or inaction with regard to lhe constsuction, operation, and/or maintenance of the Non-TraNportation Componcnts or the failure or neglect to construct, operale, snd/or maiotain lhe Non'Tmnsportation Componenl.s, lhen Partnering Agency shall, at its solc cost and exPcnse, corrcct such deficiency and restorc thc arca to the srme condilion it r+as in prior thereto, and if Partnering Agency or its succcssors or assigns shall fail or neglcct to commence such correction and restoration within 24 hours of notification thcreof, ACHD may procccd to do so, in which cvent Partnering Agency shall reimbursc ACHD for thc costs and cxpenses thcreof, includin& without limitation, reasonablc compcnsation for the uce of staffand equipment ofACHD. Partncring Agcncy sha I I bc I I able lo AC D for i l v and al I damagcs,fines,t.-,obliga ri lo fees,other ti h I ti wha tsoever resulting tiomthirdparties,costs,expen attomev or any a I comply rh rovt f th P erml t and/o Cost SharePartnenngAgencyfaiIurr:to any p S IOn o I S r ting thc forcgoi I hc nt PartncrinnanteNothoutlltilnvtnanncrI I I Ordi fai ls I o I 5 s rvith I ltlll sl on of rh ls Permi t,rh en fol lowi n n an cvc li b le notice I I vIII. ADDITION,,II. PROVISIONS,TPPLI('AI}I.E T'O PR(}JT;(''1 IX. (;l:Nf RAL ('{):,it I',il()\-S (}['PIiRlIlr Asencv I'i CHJV lpPu ul ,{\-J Jrlqnd ro ue sscJsB ol tl IrcuuBdol paturr8 uured aJsqs 1so3 leqlo ruB pu? slql e{o^sJ ol lqt! aql e^Bq s?urq llB lB llerls oH)Y 6 's1uauodulo3 uoqugodsuarl-uo1q cqtJo uolluioloJ unlry fue ol Eurlslar OHCV pus Jteslt Jo osoc ;1u puu ,tri saumssr,,(auaiy tuyarglu4 uopndspu ro .uoqBJgtpour ,uopurolal i(ur go nr11 ur guauoduro3 uollsuDdsus.rJ-soN oq3o ued u:o IIB r^ouar ot l€le oqo Iuur ,(cuoty iu;:crn:u6 .qlo.n qsri ,(un ol roud iunrr,tr ul qHCv /q pc^ordde suorpcglradr puu ,surld .euElsap ot Eulprocrs /hurty Suuaqra6 [q poqrrlduocca aq lluqs qrlq^r ,OHf,V ,(q palrnbal se ,fluauodurof, uottsuodguBrt -uoN eql tfiuErsaprj ro 'tul^orxoJ 'Supcn4suoca.r 'Sullsrolcr rog alqlzuodsar Jq [Bq6 .asucdxe pue lsoc olos rll lB'IJuoEV iuuauped ucqt'pcu8rscpa: Io .paAo(orj .palJ(qsuorg .palBJolaJ aq Fnu trsford pBoU ll 3o ged [us tuql saululrlap Alalsutlln qHJV ]f 'quauoduro3 uoltouodsuu{-uoN rqt;o {ur.;o uoltqdzpo :aq$ :o 'uo1;rcgrpotu 'uollBcolu qcns {uo og pelelcr sB uo0eu,rprooc pue tuluuuld ol lccdscr r!p{ alEodooc ol ldueIE lFqs pu8 sr!?s s$ Sqprstr.r rFptqcs ,quoud B ol ,adE llBqs blqrssod xlqeuosear lualxo cr! ol 'sruEd .$ puB '$uauoduro3 uottEuodsuE{-uoN cql Jo [uB Jo uorpldpps rcr0o Jo 'uorlEcBlpour 'uogEcolcJ E .snE ol FloW aq plnolrr lrql lccford pBoU aql ul1l t suortcs palsdlclluB ,(ur go [cuoty Euuauw6 esrlpe ol suoJJo tsoq sl! asn lll^r OHOV 'lcaioJd prog cql Jo UEd arr lelfl quaua ordur llB pu0 ^uB r.6gscpar ro 'e^ouroJ 5cnrFuorcr 'clBrolor ol lrlrlr eql e^nr{ sault llB lB llsrls OHI)V 'i IJOA\ qC0S uuoyad ot lluutd sJEqS lsoJ IEuopJppB uE .lo papuaurf, uu ,{cucEy Eugoqred cnssl uopanslp st! u! ttuqs OHJY lluJad srrlt Jo lcalqns cql lou s! lur11 lusuacrldu ro 'uollBcoler 'rl[dcrrrrutsuolulout aln1ru olSllsssceu (ru .ro ;y,n sluauoduro3 uon4rodsuorl-uo11 ,ql turla cql ul 'l 'uosaar ,(uu ro3 lftu.nd slrll Jo uollsllaJusr rolpuB 'uolluco^rJ 'uoqorldxa cql c^r^Jns llBrls uoutas srtl ut suotluEllqo s.&uaiy StnJarqla4 11urad 6lql Jo srxJol ,ql ol luEnsmd rauaSv EuuauuDd (q suoprirtqo duu 1o ecurru:o3lcd lo sc?cI,rud (u! Jo astotaxa aq puu sluauodu-ro3 uonsuodsuull-uoN 3ql l !,n uollieuuot ul to ot pelulal srolor,{uor Jo 'sluaEu sll '^luo8v EuueuuEd Jo suolssruro lo slJB {uB Jo $o .to uo{ 8ulsltB'reeJ ,(cu:011u pue 5l6oJ unoc 8u!pnl3u! 'cjru8u ,(uu 3o sceucdxc pu8 'sisoc 'suopJB 'sullEt, 'sctBuBptsllsol 'Blrnr '&g11qr11 11e pw fuu lsureEe pus ruo{ sseluu[tl slur8? puE 'srequeur '3a',(oldt{, 'sJoparlp 'srlel[o su pu8 oHJv ploq puu'fJtutuapur 'puaJep'pelord l]mr,$ua8y tuyaugul '9 'uosuol ,{tc roJ uolluSopp qcns r(w uptuluw :o alalduoc ol 3lq8un sr llJ! l$uad srql l3pun saqrlrqtsuodsar ,(uu.,o paalosqe eq lou lPqs PUE 'suorlBF8eJ rolpua ^\Bl elqucgldde :apun rado:d sr uogeBclcp qons ,(up .lcqlaq^r AululuJctop Jo $lsu l!8ct llu scumssa[11ryfcuoEytuuauyo6'uorlrppBul'(o,n,(ueur1tuuc4s1qt1osuopetllqoroscpnpfur Jo {cu.tv Eugreuurl B losqB laqs uolltflelop ou pus lluucd srqlJo suucl .t0 qt$ ecuolldtuot s.{rd p4r0 eql roJ .lqlsuodser ^taeurllp oq llrqs puB uiluer llurls ,tcuaEy tuueupu4 '[uru p4O, B 01 uollEtalop (ur Bu1pue1sq114oN ',(u8d p{Ifl aql sogluopl puB polBtolop Eupq crr s.prllqlsuodscJ ttrl^r lalop ur sngpeds tBql qH3rV ol atFott uotly \ lo!.td sc^F l! sB Euol os furd pJrql ^us ol rapunrjeq stulllqrsuodsar slt Jo ,(uu cluEalap {utu ,{tua8Y tuFaqJEd 'S lor?cJ {uB roJ ulll'd sl{t Jo uopollscu83 Jolpus 'uollEco rJ'uorlBrJdxa aql a,r1runs 11uqs uollros sFI ItI suodllqo cql '$soa paprrossu ttB ioJ qHCV asmqullel 11uqs,{cua8y Eupatl.red luala q5ns ul puu'sluauoduro3 uo4eyodsuul-uo1r1 3qr EuL{Ftpun ,{u,tr-1o1q8rr t$ ro/pus slualoduo3 uoutlo<Isuul -soN aql laRnsuotcr .to,juu 'rcrldu 't6lscPcr ot 1pu:c3 srql uI ,Dq.tcEc tclpcrEs, ptB stqEu .laqto 11a ol uort pB u! 'lq8p rqr c^eq lluqs qHJV 'ularrq quoJ ras sln, or ,tlunloddo pur I immediately perform any ond all cmcrgoncy ehcrgcncy, in which casc Partnering Agency rcpaiB or take other measuros in connection with an shall reimbursc ACIID fully for all associated costs. 10, This Pcrmit shall lrnmediately bc rcvocable and/or csncelablc by ACHD by proriding writren ngticc lo Partncring Agcncy upon thc occuntncc ofany ofthc following: (i) a dctcrmination by ACHD that any of thc informalion submittcd by Partncring Agency in the Cost Sharc Applicatiot is fslse or inaccuratc in any manncr; (ii) s detern nstion by ACHD lhat Partncring Agenr.:y has failcd to comply with any term or provision of this Permit or any other permit gra$ted by ACHD to PartDering Agency; or (iii) a determination by ACHD thst PsrtDering Agency has failed to rrylace, maintain, and/or care for the Non-Transportation Components as required by the terms of this Pcrmit- Exccpt in an emcrgcocy situation, ACHD shall providc Partncring Agcncy with 30 days' nolice ofthc issue and an opponunity to comply prior to cxercising such riShts. I l. Ttrc issuance of this Pcrmit shall in no way obtigate ACIID to providc Partnering Agency with additionel permir or righte, nor shall ACHD be obligated to utilize provisions or rights set forth in this Permit in conncction with additional pcrmits or rights that it m8y elcct to provide to Plrtnering Agency in the futue. 12. All exhibits and ary sddenda to this Pcrmit are inooryorated hcrcin. 13. This Pcrmit is conditioned upon thc Eignaturo ofACHD and Partncring Agency bolow. I This Cost Share Ppnnlt is issued by the Ada County Highway Disttict on tbo date sot forth abovo: Tho person signing below represents that he or she has tho authority on behalfofACHD to issuo Acceptance/cortification by Partncring Agenoy: The pcrson signing below ropresents tbat he or she has the authority on behalf of Partnering Agency to accept and agree to thc tcrms of this ecrd this Ada County }lighway District: (.iity of Meridian: Its: Director tsy: B and bind ACHD to the terms set forth herein. Permit and bind thc tclms set forth herein. By: Tammy Its: Mayor Exhlblts Exhibil A 95% Project Plans l(l SIGNATTJIIITS I soo ii a , { t i {I I B- t I ! iI I ! LEGEND UTILITIES Ada County Highway Districttr *.b/,8,, !sP--. tr L*b/&!,, r, &u/r E e,&F, E h&'n E L*.b/,! !, .& d. tr tu*b/eFi ,, d, , r.e E tu"/-E "d,",.ktr l6r/!F , *,. 6 6L4ti'd,dqfu edrfth-Mr* -_t*R ;ryr't- PINE AVE", ]\4ERIDIAN RD. TO LOCUST GROVE RD. PRoJECT NO.81sO25 GtS NO.'S RD208-01, RD208-01.01, rV1 214-04 Sec. 20, T4N, R2E, B.lvl. ADA COUNTY:-: INDEX OF SHEETS: 1 2 3-4 5-17 18-23 24-27 28-31 32-37 3a-40 4243 444€ 4748 49-61 Rioht Of Way Raquirements Table Plan & Protlle Sh€€ls Storm Orain & krigalion Prolil€s Miscellsneous Details Pih6 Ave. Over Five Mile Creek Briclge Stomwator Pollution Prevenlion Plans RRFB Signal Plan & Details Signing And Pavement Marking Plans Traffic Control Plans tr KD a ,A (,) \ G1fioo\ aigis END PROJECT BEGIN PROJECT 1-5 MDC Historic Lighting Plans*"-nc ,, I t- ,f ,f ,t "t *c I *i ,i "rc L1.OO-L1.01 City Ot M6ridian Landscape Plans L2.OO-L2.51 Cily Of Meridian lrrigalion Pl6ns & Dstailsrt,.-,.1'll ? h.q E'9q'l.'6fue ffi e*. &q mi!i!ddbdtu}, ffih.*bkk VICINITY MAP zz\@tiq"Certificotion Ol CompLlonce With Stondords 4o.hi,e*dqfr4qoIt + E Ada County Highway Distrjct P.oject Numtre.: 815025 Project Title: Pina Ava., Meridian Rd. To Locust Grove Rd Sheet 1 Of 61 L e E E 8 ^ i q L ttj v , r 6 n I E tt d 2 PINE AVE., MERIDIAN RD. TO LOCUST GROVE RD. R ght Of Way Requirements Right Of Way Requrrements (n rgPacilic Boir. Id.bo RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTSffiF-l''E v .p'. . Project No: 415025 Project TitleiPine Av6., Meridian Rd. To Locust Grove Rd sh6et 2 0f 61 t. .!E fallEqtlod IC]'A.-EAI]!I lYHPacihc Eoise. tdaho REVIEW TYPICAT SECTIONS I I t t II e. fi 6 E E i a,t ounly Highway Project Title: Pine Avo., Meridaan Rd. To Locust Growe Rd Sheet 3 of 61 E ll / ra-u'* t \\.--. ** *l I \ I E J; Fi g i I $ F E i e d, 6 rieEA_lEctxt! :, rrErlrlEct&! rHPacirrc Borse ld.bo T .l _4 TYPICAL SECTIONS II REVIETY FEiM P.oject Titl6: Pine Av€.. Meridian Rd- To Locust crove Rd Sheet 4 Of 6l .*i.tur ,l,!fi..r I I BI al ? , : i d ii-Ii c 3 E! q 1l i:i; o i;; 9 ,i I ! tlr ;tq I I 8 o !A :l*l! O t3 sEEol3 (, o o E U :3 i lEl! EE -@- N MERIOIAN RD 3 e @6@O@@@@OO@@@O@@@@OOOOO I I r ! ! t I i ! t i ir::;riiilii i i ii i i iii i lti ii iiii'i'l'i"u rr i iii!!;,'ii':i';i3!d;9ql 1 li 5 ! ! 3 fi ! !! : t IIl l l 1 1 I l I 1 I L Eleldo o 4 t -, i:T 6 ",-r <Eli ":dtII I e- I I PVh oa Horr qftmMeD\B\lu'6\cMr\3,s, o,r c Pmm p 5 !.t ETtt b 3 ! Lo zI @ o N ! d oi 6' ;; o : o 1.o iil Il -t o ao cI o 0 oII aJ oo 0 o o a o l \E&\Bn6\cM\''s' dr{ er.dtr 9 I I I s ? 3 ! 3 g i: g 3 B d B F EI tg s o Jlf ,ii!i;I ; d I - ; I ,:: F;i €" :r ,g a e ? :i (, o o z o -l m e N MAIN SI @ @@@o@@@@@@oo@oo@@@@@o@oooo E >+ 1i tr r-9il I , i q E a g i. 3 3 !: ,t ht I 3 ilii lt i.":i;! 6 ! I 1$ t: i: i; tlt; !1Ei Ei $t !i ;i ;i il:E: i-t "i "i'1ll i;?ii;i!'!;!; \ eT \ F!z 3 3 i.,9 I oi J i 3 o (, 8 tI I I iiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiii ii'ilriiliiiii;i11 iEiii; s'i€ !-:l ir. s i i f.o 3 ! .2 1r E3 F* r i, T p. o z 9 @ o N ! 9. 0o :1 I IJo t, 0 o. 0) B 9 -t o-o 0 o o aI a, oo o 0 o E tct s II B G] @ a I l l I : --l 1 j --t I I:I t i a ; 3 :s 9 1 I f t"I g F $t a I t I 3 o ,1fti.eil I 9 a I d I I ! E h d c I EE Ed a I j I ! l2No sr @ air !lJiotue :: ":l;l!@ -@- g E i>,r6 @@@@ooooo ! II !I a ll J ts I i iiilIl1,' I I Il'il Ii{I{If iIi i i i i; a f li ! I @o@@@@@o@o @@ @@@o rn\ il J 6) (9Jl o 8 : I e i i ? - @6@ ?$t Hi z= :it; sil;a I 5 x. - .Nti ir !; P I 1) 9. o zI 6 oo No T 9. o I q ! a o ., 0:,o of n 9 -t o-o E 0 0 oI 9 af 0 0 i 0 o i o F!1 ilrlto:i I' t ,"i'al 6 oca I l.o ! E l, E3 !r ! p. o zI o No 1) 9. 0 _-t !q !, 0 P ol.o l vI -l o-o c 0 d o ao aJ o o 0 o !i 3 E a E (, Ltl I 9 3 I !i 6 1 f; { 1 I ir{3 :m i3 ll d t I E t- fiT. E c o ,-- ! ! 3 I a q * aI 4 ti Eo E a : -S- z o -t m ! @@a@@@@@@oo@o@@@ooo@@ooooooo ! i irii : i i i i i i iti i i i$i:Tiiiii ii i' i; ; i iE:i'!:';.iiiirii ;'; a 1 t t' ' t : ! - o @ :Eleu 3 J-Ind ;blEoi3 Ei a 2inim: i II I I I LA o ql (o o I : i) I a t N $ i a 3 a it Ei :a !9 3 i E I d t a e o ri: i I d rt^d lal .L 5 -, 6 E a ls ) \- @ 3 ti lili !r !z 5: ilElE@e-: -S: z o -t m 6 6 e) i {_:! iElEojtE !' IEE' @@o@@@@@@@@o@@a@@@oooooo !t { I t ii i ii i i i iiql ir$iiittli i iiE:i:[,il;;;r; E t I !i ; : ?s ! $ 5 I t ! ! I ! o ,.i, +l iEla, lq s 8 : E t a;l 55 t I t 5 , ? I a i a\a .o!w NffiY osn[\@@\**r\tuK\cM!\3is,.' r-.-Fi@ h o t0 ooc) at oo (0 0 o E ,l EP 3, i I !! o zI o o N 1l! @ I !q !l 0 ,t o:, _o !) 7 D P -t o-o c 0 o o, o. i i 4TH ST Ie .\ (, i3 o c c E I & ,l t z q i 6 H F EI I a e I $ \ I (o a,€,@ @ A -L(r0-.r A NOTES f "-'"::l'I "..,*-:"."-"i.c +ooooo @ @ @ @o @ @o @ @o @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ L -!l*, -oU E PINE AVE. 2d I .1@ @' @(,iiG @ Sec 07,T3N,R1E ,r+oo BENCH MARKS] i..d+.-f wHPacrllc Aoise Idaho 95% R rict , ft l..& lldM 6r !&. @n . project No: a15o2s Project Title: Pine Awe., Meridaan Rd. To Locusr Grove Rd Sheet lOOf 61 I I I @ e @ @ I I r@*' f II i I 1 i I 5 ! E I EE I o 1,i i: :*Iriiirt : ; ! d ! a -@- z o --t m @@@@@@@o@@@o@@oo@oooo :rt : i' I ! i :ll !ti1i1;:i1{! : l!!l !i i i i i ; i i 'li i .i4,itl;i i i '[ i I; i :i ii i ;ii iiiiiiliE iiri :iliii!;;:iEE" i lr ! - r I i r i E:Er!i I l 3 3 I I ! t, l! i I ! 3 3-e slSl!c)i"a a lal!6 i: :El!@ :lsl:@IE ? ! 4i Ii t \EB\m'i.ncn\nor o,r+ F,s.ffi op s i lt Er :, ;I ! -! o z 9 o o No afo o 0 o ! L 0 I !q !! 0 I o f,.o a II -t o. o c 0 o o no r ,A, l" I i_dclaldo 8L:IIi8 III f I! J a 3 2 I 3 PI eg 1c tE I o t-- I a iii -S- z o -t m @@@@@@@@@oo@@@oo@o@@ooooo Ig1 rliio 9-: i It- IFli. ;;r I ril! " !ij.! i @ !t I g a I J' ],F I I I 1 .J- ! I €, o c) I 8 g a 3€ 3 .: a ? ;{ iI Fl Tlz_ iti i i i i i i i i i{i{tiiii{i iiiiii,;;ii:iiiiiiii!nii= : ; ,i E I I 1) 3 0 z 9 o No ! p. 0 sI I IJo ,' 0f.s 0rf vI -l o T o c 0 o o n o. alo 0 N 0 o dr ?i _A€ i: lfEI; t i ffi* rl il o I I t,it i!"io LT I I I I I 1 o e E B 3 Et f si I ; o {:r 9.;!!;; 3 t :l -@- z o --{ m U) @ @o@@o@ooooo L € ?r l! L ! 3 I 1 @@@eo@@@oo@@@@o i :l 1 3 Pd iEe"i! IB iEleo*"8 oE e; 7 J tn P fi 1il ili i i I li ii$1ryi$ii i i ii 5 \6d\tu6\cM\!'*' ur c 4rdM I6'a{I s :.o i E; EI ,F ! 9. o zI @ o N 1l 9. 0 :l !q !l 0 I o:,q !l) n + -lo To c o 0 oIo a, o (, 0 o 3E I I gt i T 1 g t ff B € i E d x 95% E P1NE AVE t9 B NOTES @ A @ A a0 oooooooo @ @ @ @o @ @oo @ @ @ @ @ @ €, @ @o @ V::_ A+V-5 r4!rlL_ -3 @ @ (o Ed Sec07T3N.RrE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BENCH MARI(S i++5 l{HPaciri. Aors., Idaho Project No: 415025 Project Title: Pine Awe., Meridlan Rd. To Locust crove Rd shoet 14 0f 61 I E R @ @ I r\u MW Nd&i M\@1n IiI v, 9 t ! 3 B !i Fq 1 rr I :9 ! F. 6: ,g e 9l o {a! :!c : i ! I a iH3@ e ADKINS AVE -@: z o --l m 8 @@o@o@@@oooooo t , s ! _d a a r i 133 t* T: i t*iiiii*i i i i,li i iti i I lui{I1tti i i i i ! ! t. li "fi 'i @@@@@@@@e@@oo@@@ 1 , l, L1 @ €, !@) gl E e?3 iEE e1t I e t 9 c 4 c 4 G 6! F! i; l f I ii l @ to, rn re) e (r) " "* ) ! i i ! :t, i2; E 1) p. o z 9 @ o N n 9. 0 :1 !q Ia 0 ,' oL o. 7 u P -to- o c o d o vo aJ 0 0 o 0 o a I I i ! I lit o l' iE ^d]-l --' ) I l ir I l ;i 3 9 .? is I t T ! i q o a : a I I F, r! 2r F ;{: q I e = = 4r EI:IE@ 3 -i l, ;lql!@ 3B -@- z o -l m @ @@@@@@@@e@@@ooo@@@@oooo t I ,. ! t e o .1 3 ! .1. I c : : (9 6-i@i e a .q :!: ='9! < stI 3 ). I ,I 8 ! a t. t, It tE i i i iti ii i{i i i i i i lr iTi ii :i ;i i;s!it:'iil! ;- d t ,i ' a: i, g;"iri 3 E .Flt9! E! a ! 0o zI o N aJo 0 o 0 o !! 0 :i I lj 0 ,' 0 :_o 6l a + -l 0 fo cI o d o 7)o it d * i I o f I 6 I @ I I i I ,iO I l \ 2603 (!,(,4)@ @ o 8 z AIq A NOTES E E, PINE AVE oi @ E Sec 07.T3N R1€ BENCH MARKS: '---i]i-J' lYHPac,ll. tsoi3e Id6ho Y District . Project No: a1so25 Project Title: Pino Ave.. Meridian Rd. To Locust Grove Rd. Sheat 17Of 61 95% REVIEI/ rt \ I o k,tub.hd..,o o kd.sd(n6-e.'-B(.., o L*klrqfu*b.,b Ed6 o i--rid3,*ks,hhF-,- @ h@ieu.kh^*B @ tui7,.k*-,N lr i€@ ,-oo) 3 q l 1 I ] -\,rir5\ FIVE MITE CREEK g i IAo r5 l-l Ez Itlo IA Fl..! l.u .! ii a, II a a i oI ooc) s :.o :I .!,i EI t 'E '1] 9. o z 9 @ oo No n p. 0 I !D !f 0 I o:.q !)f nI io-o c o d o aI aJ o o 0 o l i l 1 I I l, i,ffilililil:iil Fl Elil+itldl hlqhlcrclll t"Uil"Ell c l tt" ;It3i:i \.r 1,,' \ \ 6d1 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4B PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approval of Cooperative Agreement between the City and Valley Regional Transit for "Annual Dues and Service Contribution" for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $210,938.00. MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Memo To: C.J Coles, City Clerk, From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager CC: Todd Lavoie Date: 11/7/17 Re: November 141 City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the November 14th City Council Consent Agenda for Council's consideration. Approval of Cooperative Agreement between the City and Valley Regional Transit for "Annual Dues and Service Contribution" for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $210,938.00. Recommended Council Action: Approval of Cooperative Agreement with Valley Regional Transit for the Not -To -Exceed amount of $210,938.00. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN FOR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AND SERVICE CONTRIBUTION THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this M day of No�&o 60 2017 by and between VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT, a regional public transportation authority authorized under Chapter 21, Title 40, Idaho Code ("VRT"), and the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized, existing and authorized under Chapter 1, Title 50, Idaho Code ("Member") RECITALS a. VRT is the regional public transportation authority created to serve Ada and Canyon Counties, pursuant to Chapter 21, Title 40, Idaho Code, and as a result of November 3, 1998 public referendum. VRT provides publicly funded or publicly subsidized transportation services and programs in Ada and Canyon Counties. b. Member is a municipal corporation authorized under Chapter 1, Title 50, Idaho Code. C. Idaho Code § 40-2109(7) provides that VRT may enter into cooperative agreements with the state, other authorities, counties, cities and highway districts under the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-2328, which expressly authorizes public agencies to enter into agreements with one another for cooperative action for purposes within the power, privilege, or authority of said agencies. d. Idaho Code § 40-2110 provides that counties, cities, highway districts and other governmental entities in the region may enter into cooperative agreements with the regional public transportation authority in order to contribute funds from any source in recognition of costs of the authority. e. There are two primary programs which VRT budgets and funds each year. First, VRT budgets and establishes annual assessments for its regular and special members, with assessments for its regular members calculated pursuant to a population based formula, and assessments for its special members calculated pursuant to a negotiated amount. Second, VRT budgets and establishes service contribution requirements to support the operation of motor bus services within the Nampa Urbanized Area and the Boise Urbanized Area. f. VRT has budgeted $210,938 for Member to contribute for its annual assessment and service contribution; Member has budgeted the same amount for its VRT annual assessment and service contribution. g. Service contributions support the following modes: 1) Nampa Express Service (Routes 40): Operates between Nampa and Boise making a limited number of designated stops in, Nampa, Meridian, and Boise. The service operates Monday thru Page 1 of 4 Friday from 5:20 A.M. to 6:30 P.M. The service generally utilizes 40' buses with 38 passenger, 2 wheelchair capacity buses each equipped with a bicycle rack. 2) Nampa Limited Stop Service (Route 42): Operates between Nampa and Boise making several designated stops in Nampa, Meridian, and Boise. The service operates Monday thru Friday from 6:30 A.M. to 7:30 P.M. The service generally utilizes 28 passenger, 2 wheelchair capacity buses each equipped with a bicycle rack. 3) Additional Meridian service is composed of Harvest Transit Service and supportive transportation services for Meridian seniors and citizens with disabilities utilizing Dial -A -Ride. VRT will bill the City of Meridian for up to $69,000 and $16,000 for the two services, respectively. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of foregoing recitals, which are made a part of this Agreement and not mere recitals, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, it is mutually agreed as follows: Section 1. Term This Agreement shall be in effect from the 1" day of October, 2017, and will terminate on the 30tt' day of September, 2018, unless earlier terminated pursuant the mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. Section 2. Purpose The purpose of this Agreement is: (a) For Member to pay annual assessment and a service contribution to VRT for Fiscal Year 2018 in the amount of $125,938 in contribution to the costs of VRT and in support of transportation services within the Boise Urbanized Area and the Nampa Urbanized Area. (b) For Member to pay for additional transportation services within the City of Meridian to support the Older Adults and Persons with Disabilities Program. The costs of these additional services will include up to $69,000 for Harvest Transit Service and $16,000 on a per -use basis for Senior Transportation — Dial -A -Ride. (c) For VRT to use said annual assessment for costs budgeted under its regional planning and program administration, and to use said service contribution for costs budgeted under its regional operating plan. Section 3. Compliance VRT, in using said assessment and service contributions, shall comply with all conditions required by applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, and shall maintain, in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices and principles, records and books of account regarding said dues and operating costs. Section 4. Payment (a) Member shall pay its annual assessment and service contribution up to the aforesaid amount of $210,938 for dues, service contribution and the fixed portion additional supportive Page 2 of 4 transportation within 30 days of invoice to VRT at the following address, unless Member is notified in writing by VRT of a new address: Valley Regional Transit 700 NE 2nd St Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642 (b) Member's address, for the purpose of notice or correspondence, unless VRT is notified in writing by Member of a new address, is as follows: City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Meridian, Idaho 83642 Section 5. Miscellaneous (a) Each party hereto represents and warrants that each person executing this Agreement on behalf of such party is, at the time of such execution, duly authorized to do so by such party's governing body, and is fully vested with the authority to bind such party in all respects. (b) If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the remainder shall be construed to conform to the intent of the parties, and shall survive the severed provisions. (c) Except as provided otherwise herein, this Agreement and any attachments hereto constitute the entire Agreement between VRT and Member concerning the subject matter hereof. The provisions of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole and not strictly for or against any party. (d) The captions and headings in this Agreement are for reference only and shall not be deemed to define or limit the scope or intent of any of the terms, covenants, conditions or agreements contained herein. (e) This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it in any way be interpreted or construed to create, any third party beneficiary rights in any person not a party hereto. (f) This Agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto, and their successors and assigns. Section 6. Indemnification To the extent permissible by law, VRT shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless Member, and it's officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, suits, claims, judgments, fines or demands arising by reason of injury or death of any person or damage to any property, including all reasonable costs for investigation and defense thereof (including but not limited to attorney fees, court costs, and expert fees), of any nature whatsoever (collectively, "Claims") arising out of or incident to this Agreement, and any renewal or extension thereof, and arising out of or caused by the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of VRT, it's officers, agents and employees, regardless of where the injury, death, or damage may occur, except to the extent any such Claims arise out of or are caused by the negligent or intentional act or omission of Member or it's officers, agents and employees. Member shall give to VRT reasonable notice of any such Claims. VRT shall notify Member of the counsel to be Page 3 of 4 used in carrying out its obligations hereunder. Member must state any reasonable objection that it may have regarding the use of said counsel. The provisions of this section shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive the expiration or any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement, and any renewal or extension thereof. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, Member's right to indemnification pursuant to the foregoing shall be limited to indemnification for such Claims for which Member incurs actual liability or expense. The foregoing indemnification includes, without limitation, any Claim arising out of or caused by the noncompliance of any services, programs, or activities provided by VRT under this Agreement with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, regulations, and requirements, including, but not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, (i) no employee or officer of VRT shall be personally liable to Member under this Agreement, (ii) with respect to third party Claims, both VRT and Member expressly reserve any and all of the privileges and immunities available to them, if any, under Idaho law, and (iii) the agreement of VRT to hold harmless or indemnify Member shall be limited to, and be payable only from, VRT's available insurance or self-insurance coverage for liability assumed by contract available as a part of its general liability insurance program." EXECUTED and effective as of the date first above written. Valley Regional Transit: City of Meridian: Kelli Badesheim -erd Executive Director Mayor Page 4 of 4 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Tree Farm Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement #I MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-110936 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 11/20/2017 09:05 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE THIS INDENTURE, made this 17 day of October, 2017 between IM3 ID Eggers Treefarm, LLC , the parties of the first pai t, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipeline from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of a sewer line over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a sanitary sewer line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area Sewer Main Easement REV. 08/15/16 described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein, THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: M3 ID Eggers Treefarm, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company By: M3 Builders, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company Its: Manager By: The M3 Companies, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company Its: Member By: / illiam I. Brownlee Its: Manager STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss County of Maricopa ) On this ay of -/)e/' , 20)j,, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared William I Brownlee , known or identified to me to be the Manager of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. REBECCA A. Rizzo NoWy PV* - Stffie 01Arizona MARtCOPACOUNTY 2-ment My Commist 1M ExpiresSewer May 21, 2019 "o L 1 / NOTARY P LIC FOR -�Jkl &) ,Ul+ Residing at: r/,2,12,2 Or, Ph � ,c ConunissionExpires: L fes//,91)1!T REV. 08/15/16 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Approved By City Council On:—/// /L/ / -" l 7 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) �IfL'uf (8 [CC W IDI41VI SEAL On this 14-M day of N)0 VnYJ�� ; 20,I, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and C.JAY COLES known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. •9.696...•• 00, �• TA '9,rG• (SEA,) • 1$IBL1G-' 0•� ��Oj pvfv W NOT Y PUBLI OR Residing at: _ Commission Expires: n -q �. Sewer Main Easement REV. 08/15/16 C JU-131 J•U•B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT 1 U B t=OP;ir'i.NlES Tree Farm Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement No. 1 Project Number 10-16-077 September 20, 2017 GATEWAY GROUPG" C INCPPINO A parcel of land situated in the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 22; Thence South 8917'18" East, 2,647.24 feet to an aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22; Thence North 3601'37" West, 2,473.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence 22.95 feet northwesterly along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 63.50 feet, a central angle of 2042'28", and a long chord which bears North 46°40'36" West, 22.83 feet; Thence North 1430'47" East, 23.31 feet; Thence South 75°29'13" East, 20.00 feet; Thence South 14030'47" West, 34.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 560 square feet, more or less. End of Description. C. Page 1 of 2 a 250 S Beechwood Avenue Suite 201, Boise ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 iv www,jub.com i 0 50 100 Scale in Feet L EXHIBIT B N14'30'47"E -- _ D!3 23.31''__ W HlgyH(3 FPoint of Beginning I Easement No, 1 I Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delto Chord Bearing Chard Length Cl 22,95' 63.50' 20'42'28" N46'40'36W 22.83' C2 25.07' 63.50' 22'37'01' N56'12'567 24.90' Line Table Line Direction Length Lt S75'29'1 YE 20.00- L2 Sl 9-38'33W 20.00' L3 N70'21'27*w 39.130' 11 514'30'47"W 34.31' lr s [11F Tree Farm Subdivision No. i -M3 ID Eggers Tree Farm, LLC SHEET i "IY1tl1. 10,160[1 IXNWNIf(:C1lN Celt of Meridian -Sanitary Sewer Easement lLDEvcl!iEeRS, W. ARTFESOTTOV USED, :Y'Y,THE fGR AI:Y OTNFR PROP. f.T1'iRkOVT TIIC [YRRESS lt!I f i f 1 1 AVTY.OAWT�OY OF.ILif LTgltl[Il1b,SK clrccll nIrr'cuAl I � I �'• r -t b f I I S70 21 27n E r W Cre I 24.96' i / , r enspira AV kST Z Point of Beginning 11779 C:)� Easement No.l 2 � to i 9jF 0 ��. arca 21 22 n _ _ 28 27 _ S89_17'1 8"E 2647.24' _3 \' I \ I I \Atl9. I 0° \"s. i .S k I 22 --_� 27 eETISE OF MASWAS IrE 101GGFrOA4LKI [11F Tree Farm Subdivision No. i -M3 ID Eggers Tree Farm, LLC SHEET 1!IS D^[UV. nr,NIV TSS q[AGA40l%fi16.4401CAHPO�A1[OIIfREl4 ASA!l IRSTRVUE!II OFP.40FESSIO.GEURVCE,4i'rnOP[RTYOf 0CTAT. "IY1tl1. 10,160[1 IXNWNIf(:C1lN Celt of Meridian -Sanitary Sewer Easement lLDEvcl!iEeRS, W. ARTFESOTTOV USED, :Y'Y,THE fGR AI:Y OTNFR PROP. f.T1'iRkOVT TIIC [YRRESS lt!I IK&'l:N nY CSnt � � 1 AVTY.OAWT�OY OF.ILif LTgltl[Il1b,SK clrccll nIrr'cuAl Located in the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, J -U -B ENGINEERS, INC,ownship 4 North, Range 1 West, B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho r`V _ 11r k'Y f OIP1K Y Pn { 1. IASL UFIIT. 4?IWI/ M Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4D PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Tree Farm Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement #2 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-110099 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 NIKOLA OLSON 11/16/2017 04:57 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE THIS INDENTURE, made this 17 day of October, 2017 between M3 ID Eggers Treefarm, LLC , the parties of the firstpait, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipeline from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of a sewer line over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a sanitary sewer line and -their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair andreplacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the lice right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way -unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement, THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the ' area Sewer Main Easement REV. 08/15/16 described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the fust part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year fust herein above written. M3 ID Eggers Treefarm, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company By: M3 Builders, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company Its: Manager By: The M3 Companies, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company Its: Member By: illiam I. Brownlee Its: Manager STATE OF ARIZONA ) ss County of Maricopa ) On this—L,� day of I`J MW 2 ' , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared, William I Brpwnlee , known or identified to me to be the Manager of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. REB�t✓�A A, RIZZO MARICOPA COUNTy My Cortxn12M)n Expires Sewer _ ment May 29, 2019 OTARY Plif3fIC FOR ' ,�j /U/+ Residing at: y.ug E (aN,? l rT een i x Commission Expires: - REV. 08/15/16 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Approved By City Council On: 1( ( /G( STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) �Qo `-' AUGUST' Cit yor w IDAHO SEAL Of On this day of N)OV {'1'1 %1 20�before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and C.JAY COLES known to me to be the Mayor and City Cleric, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. **sense• of (SEAQ,) •: •••.`;FATE Oy 4,•; . goes 9600 chwi,A� �LVL NOTARY P LI FOR IDAHO Residing at: Tt. Commission Expires: a O'a Sewer Main Easement REV. 08/15/16 CJ -U -B J -U -B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT A 1 U -B COMPANIES Tree Farm Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement No. 2 Project Number 10-16-077 September 20, 2017 TN' M(A LANOOON MAPPINGPPING GROUP INC. A parcel of land situated in the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 22; Thence South 89017'18" East, 2,647.24 feet to an aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22; Thence North 4920'36" West, 1,960.67 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence 25.07 feet northeasterly along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 63.50 feet, a central angle of 22°37'01", and a long chord which bears North 56°12'56" East, 24.90 feet; Thence South 70°21'27" East, 24.96 feet; Thence South 19'38'33" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 70°21'27" West, 39.80 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 627 square feet, more or less. End of Description. !:� N,6 10 Page 2 of 2 a 250 S Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 w www.jub.com P 0 50 100 Scale In Feet EXHIBIT B N 14'30'47 " E �-- 23,31' W H1d ghlanFa11 Dr Point of Beginning Easement No. 1 Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chard Length Ct 22.95' 63.50' 20'42'28" N46'40'36 W 22.83' C2 25.07' 63.50' 22'37'01" N56'12'56'E 24.90' Line Table Una % Direction Length L1 575'29'1 YE 20,00' L2 S19'38'33 W 20.00' L3 N70'21'27 W 39.80' 21 22 28 27 0 v, n S70'21'27"E Gree 24.96' Z-) aspire pr i S1 4!30'47"W 34.31' Z Point of Beginning O Easement No. 2 L3 \110 I so S89'17'18"E 2647.24' 22 27 +ori°"° '"1,+ . - e1�MGu 11r.Arip TtIC IOFA°N+O f>ESYJ!ISgiCOHP0.'Ui[OIIEREIH .W I'M1+1°I6 oil n3 AHIlISiPV!!ElIT OF P.9CFEiGl011nt E;FIVGE, tilriE PR°PfRN OF IU R ENG14EERS,Ia;.i_M fMi TO°E USE°. VL'.Hti-E Ci PTRL M"WUe/.CV%4 EU3 ANYpeeR PgOICC,E1•(IIYAU7TIIC EIPR'_55',:'RiRE!! UEIIC.NW.C4a 3 n°rnonwnosoFlL-0cnmacw,+.K werK n .,, ""�� J -U-8 ENGINEERS, INC Tree Farm Subdivision No. 1-M3 ID Eggers Tree Farm, LLC 1 Cit of Meridian - SanitarySewer Easement . 2- City SHE.FT Located in the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of section 22, ownship 4 North, Range 1 West, B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho IIP l Y Di' 11' IEYI Y °n + 1' ---D.•"'Wit Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4E PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: James Court Pedestrian Pathway Easement #6 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-110098 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 HEATHER LUTHER 11/16/2017 04:57 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE -4�kl THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into thisday of, 2017,between — 0 Rodney F. Schmier and Nancy E. Schneer, hereinafter referred t as " and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantee shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple -use non -motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantee shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. Pedestrian Pathway Easement — E. James Ct. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: Rodney F. Schmier and Nancy E. Schmier F. GRANTOR: Nancy E. Pedestrian Pathway Easement — E. James Ct. STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of CANYON ) On this day of , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said tate, personally appeared Rodney F. Schmier, known or identified to me to be the person who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set myhand1d affixed mv official seal the day and year fist above written.`' SOS ....E NOTKRY PUBLIC FOR ID f No �'' Residing at: `• a °•�'` s e : r ;'. % LIG Commission Expires: i •'••••.....•.•• a '��`•0 e i p �NQ STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of CANYON ) rr On this of H day of . s , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said`State, personally appeared Nancy E. Schmier, known or identified to me to be the person who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have her unto set my hand ltd affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. �e0%111►0i1o,,i md SO•,N1 �p NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDA e •' ....... • �a Residing at: No7;q'q� Commission Expires: N 43LIG Pedestrian Pathway Easement — E. James Ct. GRANTEE: CITY OF MRIUTAN,_ Tammy de W C.J , Mayor City Clerk oIPSED AUGLST w IDAMO �sm SEAL by Approved By City Council On: t/,/ 11- 1 ,?o17 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this ' day of Nd`/1UTA bla-r , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and C.JAY COLES, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Pedestrian Pathway Easement — E. James Ct. W NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at: "Y r 1 adAko Commission Expires: 5- 9 -a 0 a a THE LAND GROUP, INC. May 1, 2017 Project No, 115195 Exhibit „A„ JAMES .COURT PATHWAY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1 An easement Located in Lot 1, Block 1 of Bridgewood Park Subdivision, as shown on the official plat thereof, recorded 1n Book 66 of Plats at Page 6760 of Ada County Records, situate in the Southwest One quarter of Section 6, Township 3 North, Range 1 East; Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows; Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Bridgewood Park Subdivision, said point being common with the Southerly Rightmof-Way line of East James Court Drive, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 89° 17' 12" East, a distance of 94.61 feet on the line common with tine Northerly boundary line of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Bridgewood Park Subdivision and the Southerly fright -of -Way line of East James Court Drive to a point of curve; Thence 21.88 feet on the arc of a curve to the right, old curve having a radius of 20,00 feet, a central angle of 62' 41' 1611, a chord hearing of South 59" 21' 39" East, and a chord length of 20.81 feet to a point on the Easterly boundary of said Lot 1; Thence North 73° 23' 37" West, a distance of 20.91 feet; Thence South 88° 54' 58" West, a distance of 83.15 feet; Thence South 89° 11'50" West, a distance of 4.83 feet; Thence South 89° 29' 11" West, a distance of 4.52 feet to a point on the westerly boundary line of said Lot 1; Thence North 00° 16' 58" East; a distance of 5,13 feet on the westerly boundary line of said Lot 1 to tate POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 552.square feet more or less. PREPARED BY: THE LAND GROUP, INC. James R. Washburn Site Planning, Landscape Architecture I Civil Engineering • Golf Course irrigation Engineering • Graphic Design 6 Surveying 462 E. Shore Drive, Suite 100 + Eagle, Idaho $3616 9 P 20$.939:4041 * www.thelandgroupinc.com NO 2,117 v U tj AM 03 CD uo� L6 F 6 P r-1 E T 6 2,03 0 cn — C-3 M - CD X 0 C 2, -n C) CD M M 0 cl :0 rn cn N. WOODFORD AVE. M C) C) C) M. CMDEWATER AVY C) C-) T -/_. _ I-1 1 17, ME James Court Pathway Easement Idaho Tn U, in 6� W ril U3 chi) CO cr M L6 F 6 P r-1 E T 6 2,03 0 cn — C-3 M - CD X 0 C 2, -n C) CD M M 0 cl :0 rn cn N. WOODFORD AVE. M C) C) C) M. CMDEWATER AVY C) C-) T -/_. _ I-1 1 Exhibit "B ME James Court Pathway Easement Idaho Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4F PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Volterra Heights Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-110100 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 HEATHER LUTHER 11/16/2017 04:58 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE THIS m AGREEMENT, m de and entered into this _0 day of 2017, between '�ereinaftemunicipal corporati nr referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple -use non -motorized recreation, with the free light of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and betweenthe parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. Pedestrian Pathway Easement THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANT BY: Iil/�rAdi l'� GK1 �/ Its: STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this -- day of 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared -AC44jellseala7 known or identified to me to be the ftU that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that suc company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. a000 � B R 0 J�" 4O o p ©O .1��1 ppOpOppnO � l 4CO �"pl p �loTA, 0 O vita o0� 0 O0 �00•� °pp 0000 0 OOOO O° OpO ppp00 � ©� 0 F o°po®cunuuennpp0° Pedestrian Pathway Easement NO Y PUBLIC FSR IDAHO Residing at: "v! ' clu Commission Expires Z• GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN AUG(/ST ow (.Ay of IDI 140 W ZCColes, y SEAL �lFP Of the TREP`' y Clerk Approved By City Council On: i [ / ( / l L/h/ �7 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this l `ice day of I �l a \feQ. r , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and C.JAY COLES, known to me to be the Mayor and City Cleric, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. •*$goes..• (SEA r�E_W•••. ARY •: 0 i FOP' �4�i Pedestrian Pathway Easement NOTARY•' 1•�' • i Residing Commission Expircs:,-�3 . % a a PARCEL DESCRIPTION PERMANENT EASEMENT Date: October 27, 2016 A parcel of land being a portion of the NEIA of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the N 1/4 corner of said Section 34, monutnented by a 5/8" rehar with plastic cap, illegible (Corner Record No. 2015-079244), from which the NE corner of said Section 34, monumented by a 5/8" rebar (Corner Record No. 108122909), bears South 88°56'29" East, a distance of 2654.64 feet; Thence South 84'53'12" East, a distance of 840.56 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 88°55'54" East, a distance of 18.16 feet; Thence South 45°47'08" East, a distance of 23.07 feet; Thence South 88°55'54" East, a distance of 475.98 feet; Thence South 01°04'04" West, a distance of 17.00 feet; Thence North 88°55'54" West, a distance of 510.98 feet; Thence North 01°04'04" East, a distance of 32.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 9,106 square feet or 0.209 acres, more or less. Together with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record. The basis of bearings for these parcels is South 88056'29" East between the NIA coiner and the NE coiner of Section 34. NJ. LAN® m� Kevin M. Borah P.L.S. �M License No. 1051 End of Description SKETCH FOR LEGAL EXHIBIT PERMANENT EASEMENT A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE NE1/4 OF SECTION 34, T. 4 N., R. 1 W., BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2016 POINT OF C0m,WIENCEAIENT NI/4 CORNER SECTION 34 S88'55'54"E S8¢S 18.16' 84oss? F POINT OF BEGINNING N1'04'04"E 32,78' 'WHpacill-c 2141 W Airport Way, Ste 104 Boise, ID 63705 208342-5400 Fax 208342-5353 wym.whpaci fic.com S88'56'29"E 2654._64' W. McMILLAN RD. S45'47'08"E ±0.209 Ac. 9,106 s,f. 23.07' S8855'54"E 475.98' N88'55'54"W 510.98' PROPOSED VOLTERRA HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO. 2 ND STER�oC�,�,L 10561 0 /r�VTE 0E NQ`T S1'04'04"W 17.00' NE CORNER SECTION 34 �rv�• NOT TO SCALE Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4G PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0018 ITEM TITLE: Rockbury Subdivision REVISED Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Rockbury Subdivision (H-2017-0018) by Rock Harbor Church, Inc. Located 6437 N. Tree Haven Way MEETING NOTES 01 Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0018 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request to rezone 25.06 acres of land from the R-15 (8.95 acres) and C-N (16.11 acres) to R-15 (6.71 acres) and C-N (18.35 acres); the applicant is requesting all of the subject property (approximately 25.06 acres) be excluded from the approved development agreements, so a new DA can be approved to govern development of the property; a proposed preliminary plat consisting of one (1) residential lot, 2 common lots and one (1) commercial lot on 23.56 acres of land in the R-15 and C-N zoning districts; and a variance to allow direct vehicular access to Chinden Blvd., by Rock Harbor Church. Case No(s). H-2017-0018 For the City Council Hearing Date of: May 23, 2017 (Revised Findings on November 14, 2017) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0018 - 2 - Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for annexation and zoning is hereby approved with the requirement of a development agreement; and short plat is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0018 - 3 - property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 2017. COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD (TIE BREAKER) Weerd 4��ED AUGUST O Attest:D 0oaQ 'S w c•jjy of &41 IDYA W C.Ja Cole s� SEAL City Clerk L/ day of /Jy VV 1� VOTED_ VOTED VOTED Ye4 VOTED 7 (f4 VOTED 1 VOTED VOTED Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Cjh I Dated: City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0018 - 4 - Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: May 23, 2017 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Josh Beach, Associate City Planner (208) 884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: Rockbury Subdivision - H-2017-0018 RZ, PP, MDA, VAR 1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant, Rock Harbor Church, Inc., has requested approval for the following applications: 1) Rezone (RZ) of 25.06 acres of land from the R-15 (8.95 acres) and C-N (16.11 acres) zoning districts to the R-15 (6.71 acres) and C-N (18.35 acres) zoning district; 2) Preliminary plat (PP) approval for 2 common lots, 1 commercial lot, and 1 multi-family lot on 23.56 acres of land in the proposed R-15 and C-N zoning districts; 3) Development agreement modification (MDA) to amend the recorded development to exclude the subject property and create a new development agreement for the purpose of attaching a new concept plan and new provisions relevant to the proposed development and; 4) Variance request to allow a right-in/right-out only shared access to Chinden Boulevard. For all pertinent information and further analysis see section 9 below. 2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed applications, except for the variance request, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit D. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on April 20, 2017. At the public hearing, the Commission moved recommend approval of the project. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Scott Wonders, Scott Harrop ii. In opposition: Robert Neufeldt iii. Commenting: Robert Ebert, Tom Mcneill, Jamie Koozie, Robert Neufeldt, Denise LeFevre, iv. Written testimony: Robert Ebert v. Staff presenting application: Josh Beach vi. Other staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. Traffic through the area, especially on Tree Farm Way has been increasing recently ii. Concerns about the amount of traffic through the area, and for pedestrian safety. iii. Discussion about how the addition of berms on the property would greatly reduce noise; c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Discussion about berms and what is required by the city vs. required by ITD. ii. The potential for alternative compliance to reduce or remove the berms from along Chinden. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 2 d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Modify condition 1.1.1C to read as follows: “The applicant shall coordinate with ITD on the amount of right-of-way required adjacent to Chinden Boulevard in accord with the UDC 11-3H.” ii. Modify condition 1.2.1B as follows: “The applicant shall coordinate with ITD on the amount of right-of-way required adjacent to Chinden Boulevard in accord with the UDC 11-3H.” iii. Add condition 1.2.4 to read as follows: “Prior to the City Council hearing, the applicant shall provide a horizontal elevated landscape plan.” iv. Modify condition 1.1.1D to read as follows: “The existing tenants and businesses shall vacate the premises by December 31, 2017.” v. Modify condition 1.2.2 to read as follows: “Construct a 35-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to Chinden Boulevard as proposed. If the unimproved street right- of-way along W. Chinden Boulevard is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, and street widening project is not in the transportation authority’s five year funded plan, the developer is required to maintain a 10-foot wide compacted gravel shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.5. The applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the landscape improvements within the ROW. vi. Add condition 1.1.1F to read as follows: “The applicant shall either install the berms along Chinden Blvd. as required by the UDC, or apply and receive approval for alternative compliance.” e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. Variance request for direct access to Chinden Blvd. The Meridian City Council heard these items on May 23, 2017. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject RZ, PP, MDA, and VAR requests. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Scott Wonders, Marsha Dennis, Dirk Benatri, Denise LeFevre ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Dirk Benatri, Tom McNeill, Denise LeFevre, iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons vi. Other staff commenting on application: Pete Friedman, Bill Nary, Mark Niemeyer b. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. None c. Key Council Changes to Staff/Commission Recommendation ii. None 3. PROPOSED MOTION Approval/Partial Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of the rezone, preliminary plat and development agreement modification and denial of the variance associated with File Number H-2017-0018, as presented in staff report for the hearing date of April 20, 2017 with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial to the City Council of File Number H-2017-0018 as presented in staff report for the hearing date of April 20, Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 3 2017 for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial of the annexation and you must state specific reason(s) for the denial of the plat.) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0018 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) 4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location The subject property is located at 6437 N. Tree Haven Way, in the SW ¼ of Section 22, Township 4N., Range 1W. B. Applicant/Owner: Rock Harbor Church, Inc. Spurwing Greens Master Association 1608 N. Meridian Rd, Suite 125 2180 W. SR 434, Suite 5000 Meridian, ID 83642 Longwood, FL 32779 C. Representative: Scott Wonders, JUB Engineers 250 S. Beechwood Ave, #201 Boise, ID 83709 D. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information. 5. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject applications are for rezone, preliminary plat, variance and development agreement modification. A public hearing is required before the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on this matter, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5. B. Newspaper notifications published on: March 17, 2017 (Commission); May 5, 2017 (Council) C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: March 9, 2017 (Commission); April 25, 2017 (Council) D. Applicant posted notice on site by: April 10, 2017 (Commission); May 12, 2017 (Council) 6. LAND USE A. Existing Land Use(s): A majority of the property is vacant; zoned R-15 and C-N. There are two (2) existing buildings developed on the C-N portion of the site that are operating with commercial businesses without the approval of the City. B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: North: Single-family residential homes in the Spurwing Green Subdivision, zoned R-8 and R-15 South: W. Chinden Blvd rural residential home and vacant residential and office property, zoned RUT in Ada County, R-8, and L-O East: Single-family residential homes in the Spurwing Green Subdivision, zoned R-8 West: Jayker Nursery, zoned R-15 and C-C C. History of Previous Actions: In 2006, the property received annexation (AZ-06-004) and conceptual approval to develop a Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 4 mixed use community consisting of single family residential, townhomes, multi-family and neighborhood commercial known as the Tree Farm. A development agreement (DA) was required with the annexation of the property (Instrument #106151218) and several addendums to the original DA (Instrument # 107002555 and 107141993) have been approved that govern the property. In 2015, a different project was proposed for the site that consisted of a rezone of 26.09 acres of land from the R-15 and C-N zoning districts to the R-15 (8.48 acres) and C-C (17.61 acres) zoning districts; a preliminary plat (PP) consisting of 1 residential lot, 3 commercial lots and 3 common lots; a conditional use permit (CUP) to construct and operate a self-service storage facility; a development agreement modification (MDA); and alternative compliance (ALT) to deviate from the landscape buffer requirements adjacent to streets set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C and the parking standards for the proposed self-service storage facility set forth in UDC 11-3C-6B. D. Utilities: 1. Public Works: a. Location of water: Provider is Suez Water. b. Location of sewer: A sanitary sewer main intended to provide service to the subject site currently exists in N Tree Haven Way. c. Issues or concerns: None. E. Physical Features: 1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The Simpson Lateral has been tiled to make way for the proposed development. The tiled irrigation facility is contained within a 40-foot wide easement that transverses through the proposed development. 2. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards that exist on this property. 3. Flood Plain: This property does not lie within the floodplain. 7. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS The subject properties are designated “Medium Density Residential” and “Mixed-use Community,” on the future land use map. A majority of the site is designated MDR. The anticipated density for the medium density designation is between three and eight dwellings per acre. The mixed-use community designation also encourages residential uses and specifies densities between 6 and 15 units to the acre. The UDC does not specify properties to develop at a minimum density. The MU-C designation (although a smaller portion of the property) envisions at least three (3) different land uses. This mixed use designation encourages compatibility and connectivity between all of the uses. Similar design characteristics are encouraged so new development blends in with the character and appearance of the surrounding developments. Further, the mixed use standards encourage a transitional use between the commercial and existing residential uses. Featured elements of a mixed use development should include the following:  Residential densities at a minimum of 6 dwelling units to the acre;  Where feasible higher density along state facilities is desired to serve employment centers;  A conceptual site plan;  Provide community serving facilities;  Provide some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space; Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 5  Landscape buffering between commercial and existing low or medium density residential;  Three different types of land uses and;  Be accessible to neighborhoods by both vehicles and pedestrians. At the time of annexation approval, the approved concept plan envisioned a mix of residential and neighborhood commercial uses for this property (see Exhibit A.2). The applicant is now requesting to rezone a small portion of the property from R-15 to C-N and another piece from C-N to R-15, which is consistent with both land use designation. A concurrent preliminary plat includes 1 multi-family lot, 2 common lots and 1 commercial lot on approximately 23.59 acres. At this time, the R-15 portion of the development is not proposed to develop. Future density for this lot will be determined at the time of lot development however, the Planning Division will determine an appropriate density based on the capability with adjacent land uses and the aforementioned density range of the designated land use designation. The C-N portion of the site is proposed to develop with 73,000 square foot church and associated site improvements. As noted above the proposed use of the property is desired in the MU-C designated areas. Although three (3) specific land uses are not proposed with this development, the site is proposed to develop with common open space to promote social gatherings, will be accessible to the adjacent residential community via pedestrian connections and my develop with ancillary uses (e.g. daycare, private education institution) to serve the community. Further, there are other vacant commercially zoned properties in the vicinity that can also develop with a mix of commercial uses to support the surrounding develops. For these reasons, staff finds the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed development (staff analysis in italics below policy): 1. “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F) City sewer is readily available to serve the proposed development in accord with UDC 11- 3A-21. Suez Water provides water service to the development. 2. “Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system.” (3.03.03B) A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway is required along Chinden Boulevard. Further, additional walkways are depicted on the conceptual development plan that provides interconnectivity between the proposed development, future R-15 property when it develops and the adjacent residential subdivision. 3. “Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels.” (3.06.01F) The applicant is increasing the C-N zoning boundary to construct a church. The R-15 zoned property will develop at a later date. The proposed church is separated from the adjacent residential uses with public streets and should operate with limited hours to minimize conflict with the abutting residents. Further, the applicant is proposing to construct a 60-foot wide landscape buffer along the east boundary. Where the C-N portion of the site abuts the R-15 zoned property, the applicant is proposing to construct a 25-foot wide landscape buffer the southern boundary of the R-15 portion of the site. On the west boundary the applicant is proposing to construct a shared driveway with the adjacent property owner. If the variance request isn’t approved the applicant will be responsible for constructing 20-foot wide landscape buffer along this boundary. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 6 4. “Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage / backage roads.” (3.03.02N) The applicant has applied for a variance to obtain a right-in/right-out access to Chinden Boulevard. For development proposed along Chinden Boulevard (HWY 20/26), the UDC requires access at the mid-mile and the section line road and requires the construction of a backage road. With the development of the adjacent subdivision the road network was constructed in accord with the UDC. Further, N. Tree Farm Way is under construction along the north boundary of the R-15 zoned property that meets the requirements of a backage road. Therefore, staff cannot support the variance request for the access to Chinden Boulevard. Acceptance of the right-in/right-out access is predicated on Council and ITD approval. 5. “Encourage and promote the preservation and expansion of Chinden Boulevard (US 20/26) by ITD (3.03.02L). The applicant should coordinate with ITD on the preservation of right of way (ROW) along the Chinden corridor. The total ROW needed for this segment of corridor is 200 feet. The submitted plat does not depict any future ROW for the expansion of the roadway. Staff recommends the applicant depict the 50-feet of additional (100-feet total from centerline) ROW with the submittal of a final plat application. 6. “Require landscape street buffers for new development along all entryway corridors. (2.01.02E) A 35-foot wide landscape buffer will be required along Chinden Boulevard, designated entryway corridors. These landscape buffers must be developed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C Landscape Buffers along Streets. The applicant is proposing to install a 45-foot landscape buffer. 7. “Require all commercial and industrial businesses to install and maintain landscaping. (2.01.03B) The applicant is required to install landscaping meeting the requirements of UDC 11-3B and must maintain the landscaping. 8. “Require neighborhood and community commercial areas to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses (e.g., landscaping, fences, etc.). (3.05.02A) The church is proposed to be located within the C-N zoning district and has proposed landscaping and berms adjacent to existing residential areas in order to create a site design compatible with the future and existing residential uses. 9. “Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets.” (3.06.02D) This site currently takes access via N. Tree Haven Way, a local street and the applicant is proposing several accesses to N. Tree Farm Way, a collector street. Further, the applicant has submitted a variance for a right-in/right-out access to Chinden Boulevard. The UDC (11-3A-3 and 11-3H-4) restricts access to collector streets when access is available via a local street or other lesser street classification. Access to N. Tree Farm Way is predicated on Council approval of the access points and the Chinden Boulevard access is requires approval from both ITD and Council. To support the applicant’s variance request, the Spurwing Greens HOA and the Developer of the subdivision have submitted written testimony in support of the Chinden access. If approved, the applicant will have to coordinate with the adjacent property owner to the west on the specified location of the driveway. Currently, the applicant is proposing that the Chinden access be constructed along the Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 7 shared property line. The applicant did submit a letter from the adjacent property owner in support of the access point and location. 10. “Maintain integrity of neighborhoods to preserve values and ambiance of areas (3.05.02). If the applicant complies with the design guidelines outlined in the Architectural Standards Manual, UDC design standards and specific use standards, Staff is of the opinion the proposed use should maintain the integrity of the neighborhood. 11. “Ensure development provides safe routes and access to schools, parks and other community gathering places.” (3.07.02N) A 10-foot wide detached multi-use pathway is required to be constructed along the frontage of the site on Chinden Boulevard and the applicant is proposing to construct internal walkways which will provide safe routes to community gathering places. After considering all of these factors staff believes that the proposed development is generally consistent with comprehensive plan. 8. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE a. Schedule of Uses: Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-2B-2 lists church or place of religious worship as a permitted use in the proposed C-N zoning district. Unified Development Code (UDC) Table 11-2A-2 lists the principal permitted, accessory, conditional, and prohibited uses in the proposed R-15 zoning district. b. Purpose Statement of Zone: R-15: The purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Connection to the City of Meridian water and sewer systems is a requirement for all residential districts. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of dwelling units per acre and corresponding housing types that can be accommodated within the density range. C-N: The purpose of the commercial districts is to provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Four districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of the district proximity to streets and highways. c. General Standards: All of the proposed lots must comply with the standard street frontage and lot size requirements for the R-15 zoning designation established in the UDC. No dimensional modifications are being requested for the proposed development. Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC 11-2B-3 for the C-N zoning district. d. Landscaping: 1. UDC Table11-2B-3 and UDC 11-3B-7C addresses landscaping requirements along streets for properties in the C-N and R-15 zoning districts. 2. Parking lot landscaping: All parking lot landscaping shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. 3. Landscape buffers to residential uses shall comply with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 and UDC 11-3B-9C. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 8 4. The proposed 10-foot pathway adjacent to Chinden Boulevard shall comply with the design standards in accord with UDC 11-3A-8. e. Off-Street Parking: Off-street parking is required in accord with UDC Table 11-3C-6 for future residential development and UDC 11-3C-6B for the proposed commercial development. f. Structure and Site Design Standards: Development of the C-N zoned portion of this site must comply with the design standards in accord with UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines Architectural Design Manual. g. Development along Federal and State Highways: The proposed development must comply with the standards set forth in UDC 11-3H-4. The applicant has submitted a variance application to construct a right-in/right-out access to Chinden Boulevard. 9. ANALYSIS Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: The applicant has submitted several applications for the City’s consideration to develop the property with a church and future residential subdivision. Staff has provided analysis for each individual application submitted. Rezone (RZ): The applicant is requesting to rezone 25.06 acres of land from the R-15 (8.95 acres) and C-N (16.11 acres) to R-15 (6.71 acres) and C-N (18.35 acres). The requested zoning is consistent with the MU-C and the MDR land use designations. The property currently contains both zoning designations which were approved with the Tree Farm (AZ-06-004 and AZ-06-050) annexation. Now that a new development plan is proposed, the approved R-15 and C-N designations do not coincide with the proposed preliminary plat, thus the reason for the rezone. Development Agreement Modification (MDA): As mentioned above, this property is governed by three (3) development agreements. At the time of annexation approval, the approved concept plan envisioned a mix of residential and neighborhood commercial uses for this property (see Exhibit A.2). Now that specific development plans are proposed, the applicant is requesting all of the subject property (approximately 25.06 acres) be excluded from the approved development agreements, so a new DA can be approved to govern development of the property. The applicant has submitted a new concept plan for Lot 2, Block 1. The submitted plan depicts a 73,000 square foot church and associated site improvements to be developed in multiple phases (see Exhibit A.4). In general staff is supportive of the submitted concept plan however, UDC 11- 3A-19A.2. limits the amount of parking (50%) that is to be located between the building facades and the abutting streets. If the applicant desires to keep the design as proposed, the applicant may request alternative compliance (ALT) concurrent with the certificate of zoning compliance (CZC) application. NOTE: The applicant has incorporated several design features (wider buffer, berms, plazas etc.) to mitigate the location of the parking area. Official approval of these design concepts will be reviewed with a future ALT application. To ensure the C-N portion of the site develops as proposed, staff recommends limiting Lot 2, Block 1 to the church use. At this time, the R-15 portion of the site (Lot 3, Block 1) is not proposed to develop. In keeping with the integrity of the approved concept plan, the R-15 portion of the site was to develop with village housing (apartments, condominiums and townhomes). To ensure housing diversity within the development, Staff recommends the R-15 portion of the development be restricted to the aforementioned residential uses as previously approved. Staff’s recommended DA provisions are in Exhibit B. Existing Structures: With a previous application for this site, the City was made aware of that the existing buildings on the site are occupied by multiple tenants without the approval from the City. The City requires that any business operating within the City limits must obtain a certificate of occupancy from the Building Division. Further, the existing buildings Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 9 on future Lot 2, Block 1 are not connected to City sewer or water service; buildings must connect to City services within 60 days of development approval. Per the UDC, site development and establishing a commercial use requires approval from the Planning Division. To further complicate the matter, there are two (2) mobile service businesses currently operating on the site. This type of use requires a procurement of conditional use permit prior to operating in the proposed C-N zoning district. In order for the site to come into compliance with the UDC staff recommends the following: 1) The applicant shall obtain approval of a CZC and DES application to install the site improvements (paved parking, landscaping, etc.) for the existing commercial businesses on Lot 2, Block 1 within 90 days of the approval of the Findings by City Council; 2) The applicant must connect the existing buildings to the public water and sewer system within the timeframe noted in item #1 above; 3) The applicant must submit CUP application for the mobile service uses or cease operation; and 4) All current tenants must obtain final certificate of occupancy permits from the City within 90 days of the approval of the Findings by City Council. At the public hearing, the applicant should clarify for the Commission the intended use of the existing structures. Preliminary Plat (PP) application: The applicant is proposing to plat one (1) residential lot, 2 common lots and one (1) commercial lot on 23.56 acres of land in the R-15 and C-N zoning districts. The proposed C-N (Lot 2, Block 1) lot will consist of the proposed church and associated site improvements. The residential lot (Lot 3, Block 1) is being platted as a single 5.83 acre parcel and may be further subdivided in the future. Dimensional Standards: Staff has reviewed the proposed plat for compliance with the applicable standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 and UDC 11-2B-3 for the R-15 and C-N zoning districts. The C-N zone is not required to meet a minimum lot size. Per UDC Table 11-2B-3, a 35-foot wide landscape buffer is required adjacent to Chinden Boulevard, a 20-foot wide landscape buffer is required along N. Tree Farm Way and a 10-foot wide landscape buffer is required adjacent to N. Tree Haven Way and a 20-foot wide landscape buffer is required along the north and west boundary of the C-N zoned property. The submitted plat does not depict the require 10-foot wide landscape buffer along N. tree Haven Way or the 20-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent N. tree Farm Way in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C2.b. With the final plat submittal the applicant shall depict the required buffer widths on the plat. The future development of the residential lot (Lot 3, Block 1) must comply with the dimensional standards set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-7. The R-15 zone requires a minimum lot size of 2,000 square feet with no street frontage requirement. Compliance with the R-15 dimensional standards will be addressed with a future preliminary plat application, if further platting is desired. However, the applicant is required to install a 20-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the collector road (N. Tree Farm Way) with the subject plat in accord with the UDC Table 11- 2A-7. This landscape buffer must be on a common lot, maintained by a homeowners’ association. Open Space and Amenities: Future development of Lot 3, Block 1 will have to comply with the requirements for qualified open space and the site amenity standards set forth in UDC 11-3G-3. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 10 Waterways: As per UDC 11-3A-6, all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways and waterways being used as amenities, which intersect, cross or lie within the area being subdivided shall be covered. As mentioned earlier, the Simpson Lateral has been tiled on the site and is contained within a 40-foot wide irrigation easement. Both he submitted concept plan and preliminary plat depict this easement. The site design as proposed depicts no structures encroaching within the easement; only associated site improvements (landscaping and parking). Further, to ensure the required trees can still be provided along the north boundary of the C-N property, the applicant is proposing to install an additional 5-foot buffer. The applicant will responsible for entering into a license agreement with the irrigation district prior to commencing with construction on the site. Pressure Irrigation: The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. The applicant should be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single - point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. An underground, pressurized irrigation system should be installed to all landscape areas per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC 11-3A-15 and MCC 9-1-28. Sidewalk: A portion of the internal street network and 5-foot wide detached sidewalks were constructed with previous development. A 5-foot detached sidewalk is proposed along the new segment N. Tree Farm Way in accord with UDC 11-3A-17. Access: At this time, the primary access into the development is N. Tree Farm Way, via Chinden Boulevard. With earlier residential development this roadway was required to be constructed at the half mile mark in accord with UDC 11-3H-4. N. Tree Haven Way was also constructed during the same time frame and provides the local street access to the proposed development in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. Further, N. Tree Farm Way is designated a collector street, and is meant to serve as a backage road to Chinden Boulevard. The remaining portion of N. Tree Farm Way is currently under construction to the west boundary of the development. This roadway will eventually be extended through the adjacent property and intersect with Black Cat Road. In the interim, the primary access from Chinden Boulevard is N. Tree Farm Way. UDC 11-3A-3 requires Council waiver for the two (2) access points currently proposed to N. Tree Farm Way. Variance: The applicant is proposing a right-in/right-out access to Chinden Boulevard. The proposed access is located on the shared property line with the adjacent property owner. With the application submittal, the applicant submitted a letter from the property owner granting use of his property for the access. If the variance is approved, the applicant and the adjacent property owner will have to record a reciprocal cross access agreement for the shared access. The recorded cross access agreement must be submitted with the certificate of zoning compliance for the development of the church property (Lot 2, Block 1) or the first final plat application whichever is submitted first. Development Along State Highways (UDC 11-3H-4): The UDC requires specific standards for developments along state highways. This property abuts highway 20/26 and is subject to these regulations. Staff has addressed the pertinent standards as they relate to this project: Access to State Highway 20-26 is as follows: 1. Use of existing approaches shall be allowed to continue provided that all of the following conditions are met: Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 11 a. The existing use is lawful and properly permitted effective September 15, 2005. The subject property is partially developed and previously used for agricultural purposes (Tree Farm) As noted above there are unlawful uses currently operating from the existing structures that either need to cease or obtain approval from the City. Further, the there was a previous access granted to residence (Lot 4, Block 1) along the rim and that access was terminated with the development of the Oak Leaf Subdivision. Because a lawful use has not been established through the City’s process, staff is of the opinion the property should not be granted an access to Chinden Boulevard. b. The nature of the use does not change (for example a residential use to a commercial use). The applicant is proposing a substantial change of use of this site from agricultural to a commercial and residential uses (e.g. church, townhomes, condos and/or multi-family).Staff finds the nature of the use is dramatically different than the current use of the property. c. The intensity of the use does not increase (for example an increase in the number of residential dwelling units or an increase in the square footage of commercial space). The use on the site will significantly increase from agricultural and partial developed property to developing the property with a 73,000 square foot church and future residential densities. 2. If an applicant proposes a change or increase in intensity of use, the owner shall develop or otherwise acquire access to a street other than the state highway. The use of the existing approach shall cease and the approach shall be abandoned and removed. a. No new approaches directly accessing a state highway shall be allowed. Because new and higher intense uses are proposed for the property and the use of the existing approach was terminated with a previous application, staff is not in favor of the access to Chinden Boulevard. Other means of access have been provided to the subject property via, N. Tree Haven Way and n. Tree Farm Way. Although not constructed, N. Tree Farm Way is expected to be extended with development of the Tree Farm Subdivision to the west which will ultimately connect into future N. Black Cat Road. The right-of-way for this road has already been dedicated and accepted by ACHD however; construction of this future roadway is predicated on development of those properties that benefit from the roadway. b. Public street connections to the state highway shall only be allowed at: i. The section line road; and With the approval of Tree Farm annexation, the City approved public street connections to Chinden Boulevard. N. Black Road is planned to be extended when the adjacent parcels develop consistent with the approved concept plan. ii. The half-mile mark between section line roads. These half-mile connecting streets shall be collector roads. N. Tree Farm Way intersects with Chinden Boulevard at the half-mile mark consistent with this section of code and the approved concept plan. 3. The applicant shall construct a street, generally paralleling the state highway, to provide future connectivity and access to all properties fronting the state highway that lie between the applicant’s property and the nearest section line road and/or half -mile collector road. A segment of N. Tree Farm Way is currently under construction and parallels the state highway. With the development of the Tree Farm Subdivision to the west this roadway will be extended and ultimately connect into N. Black Cat Road. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 12 In summary, the preservation of the SH 20/26 Corridor is one of the City’s top priorities. In U.S. 20/26 Corridor Preservation Study, (ITD and Compass, ongoing,) there are preferred roadway configurations and recommend safety improvements to these high-volume and high-speed facilities. The City supports access management, congestion mitigation improvements and the beautification of the corridor called for in the study therefore, staff cannot make the Findings to support the right-in/right-out access to Chinden Boulevard. To support the applicant’s variance request, the Spurwing Greens HOA and the Developer of the subdivision have submitted written testimony in support of the proposed Chinden access. In addition to access management, the UDC requires the following: 1) The UDC requires the construction of a 10-foot pathway adjacent to highway 20/26. On the submitted plans the applicant has not provided the required pathway in accord with the UDC. 2) The UDC also requires the applicant to reserve the necessary right-of-way for ITD. ITD has indicate this development should dedicate a total of 100-ft of right-of-way, approximately 50 additional feet. Staff recommends the applicant reserve the additional 50 feet of right of way. Reservation of right-of-way should be depicted on the plat submitted with the final plat application. The applicant should coordinate with ITD on the right-of-way needed for preservation along Chinden Boulevard. Staff has not received official comments from ITD. Landscaping Requirements Entry Way Corridors: UDC Table 11-2B-3 requires a 35-foot wide street buffer along Chinden Boulevard. On the submitted landscape plan, the applicant complies with the aforementioned buffer width along this roadway. Said buffers must be constructed in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C. The applicant is proposing to construct a 45-foot wide landscape buffer along the frontage of Lot 2, Block 1. Any unimproved right-of-way that is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, the applicant shall maintain a 10 foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative groundcover. Currently, Lot 1, Block 1 is developed with the required buffer width and landscaping but, lacks the required 10-foot multi-use pathway. Staff recommends the pathway along Lot 1, Block 1 be constructed in conjunction with the construction of the pathway on Lot 2, Block 1. Collector Streets: UDC Table 11-2A-7 and UDC Table 11-2B-3 requires a 20-foot wide street buffer along N. Tree Farm Way. On the submitted landscape plan, the applicant is depicting a 60- foot wide landscape buffer in excess of the UDC for the C-N portion of the development. The R- 15 portion of the site does not depict the required 20-foot wide landscape buffer. Said buffers shall be constructed in accord with the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-7C and must be included as a common lot with a future final plat application. Local Streets: A UDC Table 11-2B-3 requires a 10-foot wide street buffer along N. Tree Haven Way for the C-N portion of the site. On the submitted landscape plan, the applicant is depicting approximately a 32-foot wide landscape buffer in excess of the UDC. Landscape Buffers to Adjoining Uses: UDC Table 11-2B-3 requires a 20-foot wide landscape buffer when C-N zone property abuts residential uses. The submitted concept plan depicts a 25 - foot wide landscape buffer along the north boundary in accord with these standards. A 20-foot wide landscape buffer is not depicted along the west boundary. Instead the applicant is proposing to construct a shared driveway with the property to the west. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 13 NOTE: A 20-foot wide landscape buffer will not be required along the west boundary of Lot 2, Block 1 if the variance is approved granting the right-in/right-out access to Chinden Boulevard. If the access is not granted the applicant will have to redesign the site plan and incorporate the required 20-foot wide landscape buffer in accord with UDC 11-2B-3. Existing Trees: There are existing trees on the site however, the submitted plans do not address if these tree are to remain or be removed with development of the subject property. The applicant is responsible to mitigate all existing healthy trees 4-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of 100% replacement in accord with UDC 11-3B-10. With the submittal of the final plat, the applicant must submit a revised landscape plan that details the mitigation plan outlined by the developer and the City Arborist. Conceptual Building Elevations: The applicant has submitted sample elevations to depict the design of the church proposed for Lot 2, Block 1 of the subdivision (see exhibit A.5). As mentioned earlier, there are two existing buildings on Lot 2 that may remain with the development of the property. The church elevations incorporate glass, metal awnings, stucco, two variations in metal siding, and translucent wall panels. In general, staff is supportive of the proposed building elevations. Further, refinement of the church elevations proposed on Lot 2, Block 1 should comply with the submitted conceptual elevations and comply with the design standards set forth in UDC 11-3A-19 and the Architectural Standards Manual. Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review (DES): A CZC application is required to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant is required to obtain approval of a design review application for the proposed structures and site design for the church site (Lot 2, Block 1). This application may be submitted concurrently with the CZC application. The applicant must comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines contained in the Architectural Standards Manual. In summary staff finds the proposed project complies with the future land use map, applicable policies of the Comprehensive plan and is conditioned to comply with the applicable development standards in the UDC. Based on the aforementioned analysis, staff recommends approval of the subject application. 10. EXHIBITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity Map 2. Approved Tree Farm Concept Plan 3. Proposed Preliminary Plat 4. Proposed Concept Plan and Landscape Plan 5. Church Building Elevations B. Agency & Department Comments C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map of Rezone Boundary D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 14 A. Drawings 1. Vicinity Map Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 15 2. Approved Tree Farm Concept Plan Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 16 3. Proposed Preliminary Plat Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 17 4. Proposed Landscape Plan Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 18 5. Church Building Elevations Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 19 Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 20 B. Conditions of Approval 1. Planning Division 1.1 Annexation, Rezone and Development Agreement Modification 1.1.1 A new Development Agreement (DA) is required as part of the project approval. Prior to the ordinance approval, a new DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) and the developer at the time of ordinance adoption. A final plat application will not be accepted until the DA is recorded. The Applicant shall contact the City Attorney’s office to initiate this process. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and developer and returned to the city within six (6) months of the City Council granting approval of the project. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Development of the C-N portion of the site (Lot 2, Block 1) shall be restricted to a church and the specific use standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-6. The R-15 portion of the site (Lot 3, Block 1) shall develop with village housing (apartments, condominiums and/or townhomes) to ensure housing diversity within the development. b. Future development on Lot 2, Block 1 shall generally comply with the submitted concept plan and building elevations in Exhibit A. If the access to Chinden Boulevard is not approved, the applicant shall construct a 20-foot wide landscape buffer in accord with UDC 11-3B-9C along the west boundary of Lot 2, Block 1. c. The applicant shall reserve 50-feet of additional ROW (100-feet total) coordinate with ITD on the amount of right-of-way required adjacent to Chinden Boulevard in accord with the UDC 11-3H. d. The existing tenants and businesses shall vacate the premises by December 31, 2017. If the existing the tenants are to remain operating from the existing structures on Lot 2, Block 1 the applicant shall comply the following:  The applicant shall obtain approval of a CZC and DES application to install the site improvements (paved parking, landscaping, etc.) for the existing commercial businesses on Lot 2, Block 1 within 90 days of the approval of the Findings by City Council;  The applicant must connect the existing buildings to the public water and sewer system within the timeframe noted in item #1 above;  The applicant must submit CUP application for the mobile service uses or cease operation; and  All current tenants must obtain final certificate of occupancy permits from the City within 90 days of the approval of the Findings by City Council. At the public hearing, the applicant shall clarify for the Commission the intended use of the existing structures on Lot 2, Block 1. e. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3 and 11-3H-4, direct lot access to N. Tree Farm Way and W. Chinden Blvd/U.S. Hwy 20-26, is prohibited unless specifically allowed by Ada County Highway District, the City of Meridian and the Idaho Transportation Department. If the variance is approved, the applicant and the adjacent property owner to the west shall record a reciprocal cross access agreement for the shared access. The recorded cross access agreement shall be submitted with a final plat application or with the certificate of zoning compliance application for the development of the church property (Lot 2, Block 1), whichever is submitted first. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 21 f. The applicant shall either install the berms along Chinden Blvd. as required by the UDC, or apply and receive approval for alternative compliance. 1.2 Preliminary Plat - Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.2.1 The preliminary plat included in Exhibit A.3, dated February 14, 2017 shall be revised as follows: a. With a final plat application, graphically depict a 20-foot wide landscape buffer along N. Tree Farm Way on Lot 3, Block 1.This landscape buffer must be on a common lot, maintained by a homeowners’ association in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2.a. b. The applicant shall reserve 50-feet of additional ROW (100-feet total) coordinate with ITD on the amount of right-of-way required adjacent to Chinden Boulevard in accord with the UDC 11-3H. c. With a final plat application, graphically depict a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along N. Tree Haven Way and a 20-foot wide landscape buffer along N. Tree Farm Way on Lot 2, Block 1 in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2.b. d. Include a note on the final plat the expressly prohibits direct lot access to Chinden Boulevard and N. Tree Farm Way unless approved by ACHD, City of Meridian and ITD. 1.2.2 The landscape plan included in Exhibit A.4, dated February 10, 2017, shall be revised as follows: a. Construct a 35 45-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to Chinden Boulevard as proposed. If the unimproved street right-of-way along W. Chinden Boulevard is 10 feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, and street widening project is not in the transportation authority’s five year funded plan, the developer is required to maintain a 10-foot wide compacted gravel shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.5. The applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the landscape improvements within the ROW. b. The existing landscape buffer along the west N. Tree Farm Way and Common Lot 1, Block 1 must remain protected during construction on the site. The 10-foot multi-use pathway required on Lot 1, Block 1 shall be constructed in conjunction with the construction of the pathway on Lot 2, Block 1. c. The applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6B.The multi-use pathway shall be depicted on the landscape plan submitted with future final plat application. A public pedestrian easement shall be recorded for these pathways. d. Prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat, the applicant shall record a public access easement for the multi-use pathway on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. e. Construct a 20-foot wide landscape buffer along the north side of Lot 3, Block 1, in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C. 1.2.3 Prior to the development of the church and associated site improvements on Lot 2, Block 1, the applicant shall submit a certificate of zoning compliance, administrative design review and alternative compliance application to the Planning Division for review and approval. 1.2.4 Prior to the City Council hearing, the applicant shall provide a horizontal elevated landscape plan. 1.3 General Conditions of Approval 1.3.1 Comply with all bulk, use, and development standards of the applicable district (R-15 and C-N) listed in UDC Chapter 2 District regulations. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 22 1.3.2 Comply with the provisions for irrigation ditches, laterals, canals and/or drainage courses, as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. 1.3.3 Construct the pathway and adjoining fencing and landscaping consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A7 and 11-3B-12C respectively. 1.3.4 Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11 -3A- 15, UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 1.3.5 Comply with the sidewalk standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. 1.3.6 Install all utilities consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-21 and 11-3B-5J. 1.3.7 Construct the required landscape buffers consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 7C (streets). 1.3.8 Construct storm water integration facilities that meet the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 11C. 1.3.9 Protect any existing trees on the subject property that are greater than four-inch caliper and/or mitigate for the loss of such trees as set forth in UDC 11-3B-10. 1.3.10 Comply with the outdoor service and equipment area standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-12. 1.3.11 Construct a multi-use pathway consistent with standards in UDC 11-3H-4C. 1.3.12 Comply with the structure and site design standards, as set forth in UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines set forth in the City of Meridian Design Manual. 1.3.13 Comply with all provisions of UDC 11-3A-3 with regard to maintaining the clear vision triangle. 1.3.14 Comply with the outdoor storage as an accessory use standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-14. 1.4 Ongoing Conditions of Approval 1.4.1 All common open space and site amenities shall be maintained by an owner's association as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3F1. 1.4.2 The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 1.4.3 The applicant shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all pathways. 1.5 Process Conditions of Approval 1.5.1 No signs are approved with this application. Prior to installing any signs on the property, the applicant shall submit a sign permit application consistent with the standards in UDC Chapter 3 Article D and receive approval for such signs. 1.5.2 The final plat, and any phase thereof, shall substantially comply with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C2. 1.5.3 The preliminary plat approval shall be null and void if the applicant fails to either 1) obtain the City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years, or 2) gain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. 1.5.4 Staff failure to site any specific ordinance provisions does not relieve the applicant from responsibility of compliance. 2. Public Works Department Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 23 2.2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 2.2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-2-28C1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 24 2.2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 2.2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.2.18 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.2.21 Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 2.2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed public sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 25 Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-221. 2.24 Water service to this site is being proposed via extension of water mains under the jurisdiction of Suez. 2.25 Though the City of Meridian will not own or maintain the water system in this development, final hydrant location shall be coordinated with and receive approval from the Public Works Department and Meridian Fire Department prior to construction plan approval . 2.26 Structures of 3600 square feet and larger including the garage, shall comply with the fire flow, and hydrant requirements of appendix b and c of the 2009 International Fire Code. 2.27 Prior construction plan approval the applicant shall submit documentation from Suez they have approved the water plans. 2.28 Prior to scheduling of a pre-construction meeting the applicant shall submit documentation from Suez that all of their requirements have been met to be able to go to construction. 3. Fire Department 3.1 Any newly installed Fire Department connections for sprinkler or standpipes will require locking Knox box plugs. 3.2 Based on the size of new construction and the location of the sprinkler room in relation to the address side of the structure, the AHJ may require separate Knox box locations. One being at the main, address side entrance and the other at the entrance to the sprinkler riser room. 3.3 Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department in accordance with International Fire Code Section (IFC) 508.5.4 as follows: a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 ½” outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications. d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits. e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10’. f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18” above finish grade. g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the IFC Section 509.5. h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing buildings within 1,000 feet of the project. 3.4 All entrances, internal roads, drive aisles, and alleys shall have a turning radius of 28’ inside and 48’ outside, per International Fire Code Section 503.2.4. 3.5 Private Alleys and Fire Lanes shall have a 20’ wide improved surface capable of supporting an imposed load of 75,000 lbs. All roadways shall be marked in accordance with Appendix D Section D103.6 Signs. 3.6 Provide signage (“No Parking Fire Lane”) for all fire lanes in accordance with International Fire Code Sections 503.4 & D103.6. 3.7 Fire lanes, streets, and structures (including the canopy height of mature trees) shall have a vertical clearance of 13’6 as set forth in International Fire Code Section 503.2.1. 3.8 Maintain a separation of 5’ from the building to the dumpster enclosure as set forth in International Fire Code Section 304.3.3. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 26 3.9 The applicant shall work with Public Works and Planning Department staff to provide an address identification plan and a sign which meets the requirements of the City of Meridian sign ordinance and is placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property, as set forth in International Fire Code Section 505.1. 3.10 Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the code official as set forth in International Fire Code Section 507.5.1. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183). 3.11 There shall be a fire hydrant within 100’ of all fire department connections as set forth in local amendment to the International Fire Code 10-4-2L. 3.12 The Fire Department will require Knoxbox Fire Department Connection caps on all FDC inlets. IFC 102.9 3.13 Buildings over 30’ in height are required to have access roads in accordance with the International Fire Code Appendix D Section D105. 3.14 Buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144mm) or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access for each structure. The access roads shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line as set forth in International Fire Code Appendix D104.1. Parks Department 4.1 Construct the pathway and landscaping consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 7A7 and 11-3B-12C respectively. 4.2 The applicant shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all pathways. 4.3 Construct a multi-use pathway consistent with standards in UDC 11-3H-4C. 4.4 Prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat, the applicant shall depict a public access easement for the multi-use pathway along Chinden Boulevard on the final plat. 5. Republic Services 5.1 Please coordinate with Bob Olson, Republic Services (208-345-1265) and obtain approval of the trash enclosure location prior to submittal of the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. 6. Police Department 6.1 The Police Department has no comments on this application. 7. Ada County Highway District 7.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval 7.1.1 To accommodate the construction of Tree Farm Way abutting the site’s north property line, the applicant should be required to dedicate a minimum of 54-feet of right-of-way prior to ACHD’s signature on the first final plat. 7.1.2 Comply with requirements of ITD and City of Meridian for the Chinden Boulevard/SH-20/26 frontage. Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 27 approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whicheve r occurs first. 7.1.3 Replace any broken or deteriorated curb, gutter, and sidewalk on Tree Farm Way abutting the site. 7.1.4 Replace any broken or deteriorated curb, gutter, and sidewalk on Tree Haven Way abutting the site. 7.1.5 Construct one 20-foot wide driveway onto Tree Farm Way located 620-feet west of Tree Haven Way, as proposed. The driveway shall be constructed as a curb return type driveway with 30 -foot radii and to pave the driveway it’s full width at least 30-feet in to the site beyond the edge of Tree Farm Way. 7.1.6 Reconstruct the existing 20-foot wide driveway on Tree Haven Way located 190-feet west of Tree Farm Way to a width of 50-feet with two 20-foot wide travel lanes and a 10-foot wide center landscape island, as proposed. Pave the driveway it’s full width at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Tree Haven Way. 7.1.7 Pave the existing 20-foot wide driveway located 590-feet west of Tree Farm Way it’s full width at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Tree Haven Way. 7.1.8 Other than the access approved as part of this application direct lot access to Tree Farm Way is prohibited and shall be noted on the final plat. 7.1.9 Payment of impacts fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit. 7.1.10 Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. 7.2 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 7.2.1 All proposed irrigation facilities shall be located outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all easements). Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right -of-way (including all easements). 7.2.2 Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right-of-way. 7.2.3 In accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant’s engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 7.2.4 Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 7.2.5 A license agreement and compliance with the District’s Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. 7.2.6 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7.2.7 It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utili ties within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 28 7.2.8 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unl ess approved in writing by the District. Contact the District’s Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7.2.9 All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the St ate of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 7.2.10 Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy. 7.2.11 No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant’s authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 7.2.12 If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless a waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 29 C. Legal Descriptions and Exhibit Maps Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 30 Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 31 Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 32 Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 33 Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 34 D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. Annexation and Rezone Findings: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings: A. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The applicant is proposing to rezone (RZ) of 25.06 acres of land from the R-15 (8.95 acres) and C-N (16.11 acres) zoning districts to the R-15 (6.71 acres) and C-N (18.35 acres) zoning district. The proposed zoning districts are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Council finds that the proposed development complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan. B. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Council finds that proposed development would comply with the established regulations and purpose statement of the R-15 and C-N zoning districts. Council finds that the proposed map amendment does comply with the regulations of the proposed district. C. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Council finds that the proposed zoning amendments should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. Council relies on any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this finding. D. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts; and, Council finds that the proposed zoning amendments will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site since services are not available. E. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E). If the applicant complies with the development agreement provisions and the conditions of approval, staff finds the rezone is in the best interest of the City. 2. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; Council finds that the proposed plat are in general conformance with the comprehensive plan (please see Section 8 of the Staff Report for detailed analysis of specific comprehensive plan action items that apply to this development). B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Council finds that services can be made available to accommodate the proposed development. Rockbury – H-2017-0018 PAGE 35 C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s capital improvement program; Because the developer is installing sewer, water, and utilities for the development at their cost, Council finds that the subdivisions will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Council relies upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., police, fire, ACHD, etc.) to determine this finding. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Council is not aware of any health, safety or environmental problems associated with the development of this subdivision that should be brought to the Council’s attention. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. Council references any public testimony that may be presented to determine whether or not the proposed subdivision may cause health, safety or environmental problems of which Council is unaware. F. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. Council is unaware of any natural, scenic or historic features on this site. Therefore, Council finds that the proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural, scenic or historic feature(s) of major importance. The Council should references any public testimony that may be presented to determine whether or not the proposed development may destroy or damage a natural or scenic feature(s) of major importance of which Council is unaware. 3. Variance Findings: The City Council shall apply the standards listed in Idaho Code 67-6516 and all the findings listed in Section 11-5B-4.E of the UDC to review the variance request. In order to grant a variance, the Council shall make the following findings: A. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district: Council finds granting the access to Chinden Boulevard as proposed by the applicant grants a special privilege as other properties along Chinden Boulevard have approved access at the half mile consistent with the UDC. B. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; Council finds there is no undue hardship for the applicant to overcome because an existing collector street is adjacent to the north and east boundary of the site that parallel Chinden Boulevard. With the future construction of Black Cat Road, there will be another point of access to Chinden Boulevard consistent with the UDC 11-3H-4. C. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Council finds granting the access variance to Chinden Boulevard would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the community if the access is constructed to ITD standards. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4H PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: City Financial Report for September 2017 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS REPORT NAME PAGE # Fund Balance - General 2 Fund Balance - Enterprise 3 Investment and Cash Position Graphs 4 Water - Budget to Actual Comparison 5 Wastewater - Budget to Actual Comparison 6 Public Works/Billing Budget to Actual Comparison 7 Enterprise Fund - Budget to Actual Comparison 8 Enterprise Fund - Graphs 9 Utility Sales Revenue Comparison 10 General Fund Expenditures - Budget to Actual Comparison 11 General Fund - Graphs 12 General Fund Revenue - Budget to Actual Comparison 13 Community Development - Forecast 14 Community Development - Budget to Actual Comparison 15 Community Development - Graphs 16 Overtime Graphs 17 Volunteer Hours 18 Vacant Positions 19 Internal Transfers 20 Impact Fund - Summary 21 Detailed Revenue & Expenditure Reports 22-64 Table of Contents FINANCE REPORT Sep-17 CITY of MERIDIAN Month 12 of FY2017 (Oct 1 - Sep 30) Page 1 of 64 CITY of MERIDIAN FY2017 General Fund Balance Projection (based on approved Budget) as of 9/30/2017 Unrestricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Fund 01 Fund 07 Fund 07 Fund 07 Fund 08 Fund 20 Fund 55 BUDGET Based Fund Balance PROJECTION General Fund Parks - Impact Fire - Impact Police - Impact Public Safety Special Rev Capital Improve. Total Unrestricted Fund Balance @ 9/30/16 26,505,298 $ 7,626,318 $ 3,597,216 $ 801,948 $ 13,199 $ -$ 6,053,342 $ 44,597,321 $ Beg FY17 Current Yr NET Revenues (Expenditures) 675,470 $ (304,000) $ 540,000 $ 196,436 $ -$ 186 $ 2,000 $ 1,110,092 $ Net Fund Balance (Projected using Budget $) @ 9/30/17 27,180,768 $ 7,322,318 $ 4,137,216 $ 998,384 $ 13,199 $ 186 $ 6,055,342 $ 45,707,413 $ FY 17 Total Amendments 186,867 $ 961,659 $ 4,716,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,864,526 $ Current Yr NET change to fund balance Rev(Exp) 488,603 $ (1,265,659) $ (4,176,000) $ 196,436 $ -$ 186 $ 2,000 $ (4,754,434) $ Net Fund Balance after Amendments @ 9/30/17 26,993,901 $ 6,360,659 $ (578,784) $ 998,384 $ 13,199 $ 186 $ 6,055,342 $ 39,842,887 $ Operating Reserves - 4 months 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ Benefits Reserve -$ Carryforward Operating 180,913 $ 180,913 $ Carryforward Capital 5,247,082 $ 3,646,310 $ 458,000 $ 422,141 $ 9,773,533 $ Carryfoward Adjustment (3,397,490) $ (740,977) $ (458,000) $ 186 $ (18,044) $ (4,614,325) $ FY17 Comm Dev Transfer 2,275,054 $ (2,275,054) $ -$ -$ Total Reserves and Adjustments 14,305,559 $ 2,905,333 $ -$ -$ -$ 186 $ (1,870,957) $ 15,340,121 $ PROJECTED Net Fund Balance after Reserves @ 9/30/17 12,688,342 $ 3,455,326 $ (578,784) $ 998,384 $ 13,199 $ -$ 7,926,299 $ 24,502,766 $ ACTUAL NET FUND BALANCE @ 9/30/17 Unrestricted Fund Balance @ 9/30/16 26,505,298 $ 7,626,318 $ 3,597,216 $ 801,948 $ 13,199 $ -$ 6,053,342 $ 44,597,321 $ Actual Revenues @ 9/30/17 47,811,637 $ 2,199,218 $ 1,510,826 $ 370,336 $ -$ 641,515 $ 62,076 $ 52,595,608 $ Actual Expenditures @ 9/30/17 41,350,874 $ 3,945,190 $ -$ -$ -$ 655,694 $ (1,929,479) $ 44,022,279 $ ACTUAL NET FUND BALANCE @ 9/30/17 32,966,061 $ 5,880,346 $ 5,108,042 $ 1,172,284 $ 13,199 $ (14,179) $ 8,044,897 $ 53,170,650 $ Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 2 of 64 Preliminary Report as of Nov. 30, 2017 Page 3 of 64 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 4 of 64 NOTE: 1/2 Billing/Public Works = Administrative costs allocated 50% / 50% to Water and Wastewater departments. City of Meridian Water Department Incuding PW Admin Costs - Enterprise Fund Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2017 for Month Ending 09/30/2017 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance % WATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Revenue Water Sales 8,255,445 $ 8,255,445 $ 8,715,578 $ 460,133 $ 6% 8,724,554 $ 0% Miscellaneous 270,000 $ 270,000 $ 379,621 $ 109,621 $ 41% 320,991 $ 18% 1/2 Billing/Public Works 464,636 $ 464,636 $ 682,407 $ 217,772 $ 47% 684,911 $ 0% Total Revenue 8,990,081 $ 8,990,081 $ 9,777,606 $ 787,525 $ 9% 9,730,455 $ 0% Personnel Costs Administration 244,430 $ 244,430 $ 234,289 $ 10,141 $ 4% 218,058 $ 7% Operations 547,797 $ 547,797 $ 525,388 $ 22,409 $ 4% 468,785 $ 12% Distribution 623,081 $ 623,081 $ 582,711 $ 40,370 $ 6% 585,506 $ 0% Production 288,171 $ 288,171 $ 249,550 $ 38,621 $ 13% 204,626 $ 22% Backflow Prevention 124,082 $ 124,082 $ 116,390 $ 7,691 $ 6% 68,308 $ 70% 1/2 Billing/Public Works 2,031,471 $ 2,031,471 $ 1,693,269 $ 338,203 $ 17% 1,649,705 $ 3% Total Personnel Costs 3,859,032 $ 3,859,032 $ 3,401,596 $ 457,436 $ 12% 3,194,988 $ 6% Operating Costs Administration 414,687 $ 414,687 $ 318,193 $ 96,494 $ 23% 352,032 $ -10% Operations 548,099 $ 548,099 $ 363,498 $ 184,601 $ 34% 762,423 $ -52% Distribution 280,495 $ 280,495 $ 227,745 $ 52,750 $ 19% 216,935 $ 5% Production 914,463 $ 914,463 $ 857,612 $ 56,851 $ 6% 897,863 $ -4% Backflow Prevention 74,700 $ 74,700 $ 73,383 $ 1,317 $ 2% 70,888 $ 4% General Fund Transfer 1,086,710 $ 1,086,710 $ 996,343 $ 90,367 $ 8% 985,149 $ 1% 1/2 Billing/Public Works 1,247,399 $ 1,247,399 $ 807,007 $ 440,392 $ 35% 684,932 $ 18% Total Operating Costs 4,566,553 $ 4,566,553 $ 3,643,782 $ 922,771 $ 20% 3,970,222 $ -8% Operating Income (Loss) 564,496 $ 564,496 $ 2,732,228 $ 2,167,733 $ 384% 2,565,246 $ 7% Capital Outlay Operations Administration 702,185 $ 702,185 $ 454,622 $ 247,563 $ 35% 408,272 $ 11% Distribution 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 119,278 $ 722 $ 1% -$ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 71,130 $ 71,130 $ 78,065 $ (6,936) $ -10% 187,256 $ -58% Total Capital Outlay 893,315 $ 893,315 $ 651,966 $ 241,349 $ 27% 595,528 $ 9% Net Income (Loss) from Operations (328,819) $ (328,819) $ 2,080,263 $ 2,409,082 $ -733% 1,969,718 $ 6% WATER CONSTRUCTION Revenue Residential Assessments 2,080,000 $ 2,080,000 $ 3,931,397 $ 1,851,397 $ 89% 2,587,502 $ 52% Commercial Assessments 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 531,534 $ 231,534 $ 77% 327,374 $ 62% Interest 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 212,824 $ 62,824 $ 42% 191,409 $ 11% Total Revenue 2,530,000 $ 2,530,000 $ 4,675,754 $ 2,145,755 $ 85% 3,106,285 $ 51% Operating Costs 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 10,175 $ 7,825 $ 43% 47,371 $ -79% Capital Construction Projects 7,146,829 $ 7,146,829 $ 3,861,038 $ 3,285,791 $ 46% 3,297,374 $ 17% Net Income (Loss) from Construction (4,634,829) $ (4,634,829) $ 804,541 $ 5,439,370 $ -117% (238,459) $ -437% Water Department Net Income (Loss) (4,963,648) $ (4,963,648) $ 2,884,804 $ 7,848,452 $ -158% 1,731,259 $ -60% Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 5 of 64 NOTE: 1/2 Billing/Public Works = Administrative costs allocated 50% / 50% to Water and Wastewater departments. City of Meridian Waste Water Including PW Admin Costs - Enterprise Fund Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2017 for Month Ending 09/30/2017 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance % WASTE WATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Revenue Utility Sales 14,900,000 $ 14,900,000 $ 14,899,247 $ (753) $ 0% 14,366,754 $ Miscellaneous -$ -$ 169,019 $ 169,019 $ 51,524 $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 464,636 $ 464,636 $ 682,407 $ 217,772 $ 47% 684,911 $ Total Revenue 15,364,636 $ 15,364,636 $ 15,750,673 $ 386,038 $ 3% 15,103,189 $ Personnel Costs Administration 275,177 $ 275,177 $ 260,371 $ 14,806 $ 5% 233,648 $ Treatment Plant 1,360,718 $ 1,360,718 $ 1,325,512 $ 35,206 $ 3% 1,308,376 $ Collection Lines 541,023 $ 541,023 $ 393,621 $ 147,402 $ 27% 467,763 $ Pretreatment Division 159,590 $ 159,590 $ 152,328 $ 7,262 $ 5% 148,952 $ Lab 420,932 $ 420,932 $ 407,671 $ 13,261 $ 3% 386,780 $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 2,031,471 $ 2,031,471 $ 1,693,269 $ 338,203 $ 17% 1,649,705 $ Total Personnel Costs 4,788,912 $ 4,788,912 $ 4,232,772 $ 556,140 $ 12% 4,195,222 $ Operating Costs Administration 482,882 $ 482,882 $ 405,252 $ 77,631 $ 16% 354,930 $ Treatment Plant 1,964,156 $ 1,964,156 $ 2,009,285 $ (45,129) $ -2% 1,601,598 $ Collection Lines 505,525 $ 505,525 $ 474,480 $ 31,045 $ 6% 439,646 $ Pretreatment Division 22,540 $ 22,540 $ 17,036 $ 5,504 $ 24% 17,598 $ Lab 222,930 $ 222,930 $ 145,471 $ 77,459 $ 35% 131,166 $ General Fund Transfer 1,086,710 $ 1,086,710 $ 1,011,646 $ 75,064 $ 7% 1,000,883 $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 1,247,399 $ 1,247,399 $ 807,007 $ 440,392 $ 35% 684,932 $ Total Operating Costs 5,532,142 $ 5,532,142 $ 4,870,175 $ 661,967 $ 12% 4,230,754 $ Operating Income (Loss) 5,043,583 $ 5,043,583 $ 6,647,727 $ 1,604,144 $ 32% 6,677,212 $ Capital Outlay Operations Administration 87,306 $ 87,306 $ 71,027 $ 16,279 $ 19% 275,031 $ Treatment Plant -$ -$ -$ -$ 199,854 $ Collection Lines 462,275 $ 462,275 $ 468,624 $ (6,349) $ -1% -$ Lab -$ -$ 6,116 $ (6,116) $ 5,477 $ Biosolids Division -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 71,130 $ 71,130 $ 78,065 $ (6,936) $ -10% 187,256 $ Total Capital Outlay 620,711 $ 620,711 $ 623,833 $ (3,122) $ -1% 667,619 $ Net Income (Loss) from Operations 4,422,871 $ 4,422,871 $ 6,023,894 $ 1,601,022 $ 36% 6,009,594 $ WASTE WATER CONSTRUCTION Revenue Residential Assessments 3,498,343 $ 3,498,343 $ 7,555,352 $ 4,057,009 $ 116% 5,137,538 $ Commercial Assessments 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 997,627 $ 547,627 $ 122% 646,511 $ EPA Compliance Revenue 1,432,215 $ 1,432,215 $ 1,455,268 $ 23,053 $ 2% 1,389,652 $ Interest 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 416,908 $ 191,908 $ 85% 419,370 $ Miscellaneous -$ -$ 20,431 $ 20,431 $ 127,157 $ Total Revenue 5,605,558 $ 5,605,558 $ 10,445,586 $ 4,840,028 $ 86% 7,720,228 $ Operating Costs 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 20,032 $ 14,968 $ 43% (161,348) $ Capital Construction Projects 33,382,592 $ 33,382,592 $ 15,084,808 $ 18,297,785 $ 55% 9,791,291 $ Net Income (Loss) from Construction (27,812,034) $ (27,812,034) $ (4,659,254) $ (23,152,781) $ 83% (1,909,716) $ Waste Water Department Net Income (Loss) (23,389,163) $ (23,389,163) $ 1,364,640 $ 24,753,803 $ -106% 4,099,878 $ Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 6 of 64 NOTE: Administrative Costs are allocated to Water and Wastewater departments 50%/50% City of Meridian Enterprise Overhead - Public Works/Utility Billing/Environmental Divisions Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2017 for Month Ending 09/30/2017 Actual Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual Revenue PW Review Fees 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 625,905 $ 375,905 $ 150% 643,106 $ Utility Billing Fees 679,271 $ 679,271 $ 738,910 $ 59,639 $ 9% 726,716 $ Total Revenue 929,271 $ 929,271 $ 1,364,815 $ 435,544 $ 47% 1,369,821 $ Personnel Costs 4,062,943 $ 4,062,943 $ 3,386,537 $ 676,406 $ 17% 3,299,409 $ Operating Expense 2,494,797 $ 2,494,797 $ 1,614,013 $ 880,784 $ 35% 1,369,864 $ Transfers 293,583 $ 293,583 $ 177,013 $ 116,570 $ 40% 187,317 $ Total OE 2,788,380 $ 2,788,380 $ 1,791,026 $ 997,354 $ 36% 1,557,181 $ Total PC & OE 6,851,323 $ 6,851,323 $ 5,177,563 $ 1,673,760 $ 24% 4,856,590 $ Operating Income (Loss) (5,922,052) $ (5,922,052) $ (3,812,749) $ 2,109,303 $ -36% (3,486,769) $ Capital Outlay 142,260 $ 290,653 $ 156,131 $ 134,522 $ 46% 374,512 $ Net Income (Loss) (6,064,311) $ (6,212,704) $ (3,968,879) $ 2,243,825 $ -36% (3,861,281) $ Budget to Actual Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 7 of 64 City of Meridian Total Enterprise Fund Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2017 for Month Ending 09/30/2017 Unrestricted Net Position at 9/30/2016 46,670,751 $ Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $ TOTAL UTILITY OPERATIONS Operating Revenue Water Sales 8,255,445 $ 8,255,445 $ 8,715,578 $ 460,133 $ 8,724,554 $ (8,976) $ Wastewater Sales 14,900,000 $ 14,900,000 $ 14,899,247 $ (753) $ 14,366,754 $ 532,493 $ Public Works/Utility Billing 929,271 $ 929,271 $ 1,364,815 $ 435,544 $ 1,369,821 $ (5,007) $ Miscellaneous 270,000 $ 270,000 $ 548,640 $ 278,640 $ 372,515 $ 176,124 $ Total Revenue 24,354,716 $ 24,354,716 $ 25,528,279 $ 1,173,563 $ 24,833,644 $ 694,635 $ Personnel Costs Water Division 1,827,561 $ 1,827,561 $ 1,708,327 $ 119,233 $ 1,567,192 $ 141,136 $ Wastewater Division 2,757,440 $ 2,757,440 $ 2,540,539 $ 216,901 $ 2,583,623 $ (43,084) $ Public Works/Utility Billing 4,062,943 $ 4,062,943 $ 3,386,537 $ 676,406 $ 3,319,642 $ 66,895 $ Total Personnel Costs 8,647,944 $ 8,647,944 $ 7,635,404 $ 1,012,540 $ 7,470,457 $ 164,946 $ Operating Costs Water Division 2,232,444 $ 2,232,444 $ 1,840,431 $ 392,013 $ 2,300,141 $ (459,710) $ Wastewater Division 3,198,033 $ 3,198,033 $ 3,051,522 $ 146,511 $ 2,544,939 $ 506,584 $ Public Works/Utility Billing 2,494,797 $ 2,494,797 $ 1,614,013 $ 880,784 $ 1,369,864 $ 244,149 $ Total Operating Costs 7,925,274 $ 7,925,274 $ 6,505,967 $ 1,419,307 $ 6,214,944 $ 291,023 $ Total PC & OE 16,573,218 $ 16,573,218 $ 14,141,371 $ 2,431,847 $ 13,685,402 $ 455,969 $ Capital Operations 1,514,027 $ 1,514,027 $ 1,275,799 $ 238,228 $ 1,263,146 $ 12,652 $ General Fund Transfer 2,467,003 $ 2,467,003 $ 2,185,002 $ 2,173,348 $ Operations Income (Loss) 3,800,469 $ 3,800,469 $ 7,926,107 $ 4,125,638 $ (2,173,348) $ 10,099,455 $ CONSTRUCTION Construction Revenue Residential Assessments 5,378,343 $ 5,378,343 $ 8,100,020 $ 2,721,677 $ 7,194,790 $ 905,230 $ Commercial Assessments 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,529,161 $ 779,161 $ 973,885 $ 555,276 $ Multi-Family Assessments 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 3,386,729 $ 3,186,729 $ 530,250 $ 2,856,478 $ EPA Compliance Revenue 1,432,215 $ 1,432,215 $ 1,455,268 $ 23,053 $ 1,389,652 $ 65,615 $ Miscellaneous -$ -$ 27,811 $ 27,811 $ 140,377 $ (112,566) $ Interest 375,000 $ 375,000 $ 629,732 $ 254,732 $ 530,634 $ 99,098 $ Total Construction Revenue 8,135,558 $ 8,135,558 $ 15,128,720 $ 6,993,162 $ 10,759,588 $ 4,369,132 $ Operating Costs Construction 53,000 $ 53,000 $ 30,207 $ 22,793 $ (113,977) $ 144,184 $ Capital Construction Projects 40,529,421 $ 40,529,421 $ 18,945,846 $ 21,583,575 $ 13,088,665 $ 5,857,181 $ Construction Income (Loss) (32,446,863) $ (32,446,863) $ (3,847,333) $ 28,599,530 $ (2,215,100) $ (1,632,233) $ Enterprise Fund Net Income (Loss) (28,646,394) $ (28,646,394) $ 4,078,774 $ Fund Balance 18,024,357 $ 18,024,357 $ 50,749,525 $ Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 8 of 64 City of Meridian Enterprise Fund Graphs FY2017 for Month Ending 09/30/2017 Notes: * The revenues and costs for Public Works Administration and for General Fund Support services are split evenly between Water and Wastewater * Depreciation expense is not included in these graphs. $- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,000 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 YTD Actual Utility Connection / Assessment Revenue Water Connection Revenue Sewer Connection Revenue Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 9 of 64 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 10 of 64 Utility Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 11 of 64 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 12 of 64 City of Meridian General Fund Revenue FY 2017 Budget to Actual Comparison As Of 8/31/17 Total Revenue does not include Community Development Permit Revenues Budget with Amendments Current Period Actual Current Year Actual Budget Remaining Percent of Budget Remaining Prior Year Actual Taxes General Property Tax Revenue 28,280,322.00 21,394.82 28,854,152.59 (573,830.59) (2.02)% 26,634,070.50 Total Taxes 28,280,322.00 21,394.82 28,854,152.59 (573,830.59) (2.03)% 26,634,070.50 Licenses & Permits Liquor License Revenues 66,969.96 450.00 74,412.50 (7,442.54) (11.11)% 73,775.00 Misc Licenses/Permits Revenues 9,999.96 2,039.00 19,920.50 (9,920.54) (99.20)% 19,347.50 Fire Inspection & Permit Fees 0.00 696.00 13,489.00 (13,489.00) 0.00% 14,871.00 Dog License Revenues 45,000.00 1,429.00 49,741.10 (4,741.10) (10.53)% 53,977.70 Total Licenses & Permits 121,969.92 4,614.00 157,563.10 (35,593.18) (29.18)% 161,971.20 Intergovernmental Grant Revenues 1,221,046.04 133,981.22 559,340.49 661,705.55 54.19% 499,808.02 Grant Revenue - Capital 75,395.00 0.00 65,834.56 9,560.44 12.68% 4,605.00 State Revenue Sharing Revenue 4,500,000.00 1,790,036.40 6,081,284.93 (1,581,284.93) (35.13)% 5,498,923.42 State Liquor Apportionment Revenue 608,979.96 203,144.00 896,285.00 (287,305.04) (47.17)% 717,141.00 Rural Fire & Misc Revenue 1,389,201.96 106,045.93 1,024,015.61 365,186.35 26.28% 1,387,957.17 Meridian Downtown Development 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 (25,000.00) 0.00% 81,717.41 Total Intergovernmental 7,794,622.96 2,258,207.55 8,651,760.59 (857,137.63) (11.00)% 8,190,152.02 Franchise Fees Gas Franchise Revenue 600,000.00 83,479.00 726,363.23 (126,363.23) (21.06)% 655,388.58 Cable TV Franchise Revenue 225,000.00 55,972.30 230,294.85 (5,294.85) (2.35)% 229,089.67 Electricity Franchise Revenue 500,000.04 228,775.23 641,802.73 (141,802.69) (28.36)% 579,789.89 Total Franchise Fees 1,325,000.04 368,226.53 1,598,460.81 (273,460.77) (20.64)% 1,464,268.14 Fines & Forfeitures False Alarm Fees 2,000.04 2,760.00 30,205.00 (28,204.96) (1,410.21)% 6,220.00 Court Revenue 399,999.96 70,837.17 417,064.64 (17,064.68) (4.26)% 449,954.56 Restitution 0.00 174.46 2,367.26 (2,367.26) 0.00% 2,154.87 Federal Drug Seizure Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 17,659.74 State Drug Seizure Revenue 0.00 3,968.00 12,796.00 (12,796.00) 0.00% 22,940.88 Fines, Forfeit Revenues 5,000.04 1,140.00 11,085.00 (6,084.96) (121.69)% 11,456.50 Total Fines & Forfeitures 407,000.04 78,879.63 473,517.90 (66,517.86) (16.34)% 510,386.55 Charges for services Passport Revenues 39,999.96 6,325.00 78,075.00 (38,075.04) (95.18)% 55,050.00 Reimbursement Revenues 31,232.00 48,548.26 227,235.36 (196,003.36) (627.57)% 210,711.51 School Resource Revenue 297,500.04 0.00 351,556.49 (54,056.45) (18.17)% 281,591.57 Rental Income 127,000.08 24,104.85 154,281.73 (27,281.65) (21.48)% 43,332.00 Park Reservations Fee Revenue 110,000.04 6,974.60 156,655.88 (46,655.84) (42.41)% 145,061.70 Recreation Class Revenues 200,000.04 8,593.30 230,359.09 (30,359.05) (15.17)% 230,513.49 Community Event Rev/Sponsorship 69,320.04 4,500.00 82,956.07 (13,636.03) (19.67)% 69,021.51 Sports Revenue 216,000.00 5,023.91 337,768.72 (121,768.72) (56.37)% 246,979.30 Contract Service Revenues 8,000.04 2,401.48 10,551.15 (2,551.11) (31.88)% 8,170.91 Total Charges for services 1,099,052.24 106,471.40 1,629,439.49 (530,387.25) (48.26)% 1,290,431.99 Impact revenues Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 69,806.88 986,022.18 (986,022.18) 0.00% 261,775.80 Impact Rev - Commercial 80,000.04 12,474.72 438,242.04 (358,242.00) (447.80)% 241,356.29 Impact Rev - Residential 1,714,436.04 201,496.14 2,515,141.73 (800,705.69) (46.70)% 2,408,047.99 Total Impact revenues 1,794,436.08 283,777.74 3,939,405.95 (2,144,969.87) (119.53)% 2,911,180.08 Donations Donations (plus project code) 31,126.04 7,069.23 34,430.97 (3,304.93) (10.61)% 94,953.02 MAC Arts Commission Revenues 28,579.96 0.00 13,612.00 14,967.96 52.37% 24,709.64 Cash Donation for Capital Outlay 425,000.00 0.00 23,387.50 401,612.50 94.49% 0.00 Total Donations 484,706.00 7,069.23 71,430.47 413,275.53 85.26% 119,662.66 Interest Revenues Interest Earnings 192,000.00 70,594.45 544,566.80 (352,566.80) (183.62)% 370,711.72 Total Interest Revenues 192,000.00 70,594.45 544,566.80 (352,566.80) (183.63)% 370,711.72 Miscellaneous revenues Recycled Revenue 0.00 0.00 32,233.71 (32,233.71) 0.00% 13,369.18 Miscellaneous Revenues 0.00 80.00 7,184.95 (7,184.95) 0.00% 13,641.84 Total Miscellaneous revenues 0.00 80.00 39,418.66 (39,418.66) 0.00% 27,011.02 TOTAL REVENUES 41,499,109.28 3,199,315.35 45,959,716.36 (4,460,607.08) (10.74)% 41,679,845.88 Unrealized GAIN on investments Unrealized Gain on Investments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 30,029.76 Total Unrealized GAIN on investments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 30,029.76 Sale of capital assets GAIN Sale of Assets - Gain(Loss) 0.00 4,946.50 94,883.87 (94,883.87) 0.00% 100,253.67 Total Sale of capital assets GAIN 0.00 4,946.50 94,883.87 (94,883.87) 0.00% 100,253.67 TOTAL REVENUES plus Sale of Assets 41,499,109.28 3,204,261.85 46,054,600.23 (4,555,490.95) (10.97)% 41,810,129.31 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 13 of 64 Revenue City of Meridian Community Development Services Year End Change to Fund Balance Forecast FY2017 for Month Ending 09/30/2017 Total Original Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD Projected TOTAL DEV. SVCS. REVENUE Commercial Permits 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 1,333,039 $ 1,333,039 $ All other Permits 2,665,000 $ 2,665,000 $ 4,774,580 $ 4,774,580 $ Planning Revenue 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 430,615 $ 430,615 $ Miscellaneous Revenue -$ -$ 380 $ 380 $ Total Revenues 3,715,000 $ 3,715,000 $ 6,538,613 $ 6,538,613 $ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICE FUND Revenue 3,715,000 $ 3,715,000 $ 6,538,613 $ 6,538,613 $ PC 1,384,470 $ 1,384,470 $ 1,333,209 $ 1,333,209 $ OE 2,136,335 $ 2,136,335 $ 2,534,819 $ 2,534,819 $ Net Operating to Fund Balance 194,195 $ 194,195 $ 2,670,586 $ 2,670,586 $ CO & Interfund Transfers 74,109 $ 74,109 $ 38,406 $ 38,406 $ Total Change to Fund Balance 120,086 $ 120,086 $ 2,632,179 $ 2,632,179 $ FY2003 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $585,467 FY2004 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $799,548 FY2005 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,897,123 FY2006 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,815,539 FY2007 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,172,405 FY2008 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0 FY2009 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0 FY2010 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0 FY2011 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $600,722 FY2012 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,044,914 FY2013 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,592,539 FY2014 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,391,676 FY2015 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,652,245 FY2016 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,275,054 TOTAL $17,827,232 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 14 of 64 City of Meridian Community Development Services Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2017 for Month Ending 09/30/2017 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $ ADMINISTRATION Personnel Costs 219,140 $ 219,140 $ 200,832 $ 18,308 $ 8% 187,861 $ 12,972 $ Operating Expenses 147,151 $ 147,151 $ 62,476 $ 84,675 $ 58% 40,923 $ 21,553 $ Total PC & OE 366,291 $ 366,291 $ 263,309 $ 102,983 $ 28% 228,784 $ 34,524 $ Interfund Transfers 74,362 $ 74,362 $ 67,453 $ 6,909 $ 9% 73,408 $ (5,955) $ Fund Balance Transfer -$ 2,275,054 $ 3,043,921 $ PLANNING Personnel Costs 585,917 $ 585,917 $ 560,931 $ 24,987 $ 4% 532,744 $ 28,187 $ Operating Expenses 69,400 $ 69,400 $ 25,911 $ 43,489 $ 63% 33,217 $ (7,305) $ Total PC and OE 655,317 $ 655,317 $ 586,842 $ 68,475 $ 10% 565,960 $ 20,882 $ BUILDING Personnel Costs 456,178 $ 456,178 $ 454,826 $ 1,352 $ 0% 438,656 $ 16,170 $ Operating Expenses 1,754,933 $ 1,754,933 $ 2,335,180 $ (580,247) $ -33% 1,989,205 $ 345,975 $ Total PC & OE 2,211,111 $ 2,211,111 $ 2,790,006 $ (578,895) $ -26% 2,427,861 $ 362,145 $ Capital Outlay 28,317 $ 28,317 $ -$ 28,317 $ 100% -$ -$ Interfund Transfers (57,254) $ (57,254) $ (56,517) $ (737) $ 1% (56,183) $ (334) $ ECONOMIC DEVLP Personnel Costs 123,235 $ 123,235 $ 116,619 $ 6,616 $ 5% 112,977 $ 3,642 $ Operating Expenses 164,850 $ 164,850 $ 111,252 $ 53,598 $ 33% 89,542 $ 21,710 $ Total PC & OE 288,085 $ 288,085 $ 227,871 $ 60,214 $ 21% 202,519 $ 25,352 $ Interfund Transfers 28,684 $ 28,684 $ 27,470 $ 1,214 $ 4% 21,570 $ 5,900 $ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICE FUND Personnel Costs 1,384,470 $ 1,384,470 $ 1,333,209 $ 51,262 $ 4% 1,272,238 $ 60,971 $ Operating Expenses 2,136,335 $ 2,136,335 $ 2,534,819 $ (398,485) $ -19% 2,152,887 $ 381,933 $ Total PC and OE 3,520,805 $ 3,520,805 $ 3,868,028 $ (347,223) $ -10% 3,425,124 $ 442,903 $ Capital Outlay 28,317 $ 28,317 $ -$ 28,317 $ 100% -$ -$ Interfund Transfers 45,792 $ 45,792 $ 38,406 $ 7,386 $ 16% 38,795 $ (388) $ Fund Balance Transfer -$ 2,275,054 $ 3,043,921 $ NOTE: Interfund Transfers = 25.42% of City Hall costs transfer to Community Development Services Budget to Actual Actual City of Meridian Building Department Permit Revenue compared to Building Inspectors Expense FY2017 for Month Ending 09/30/2017 % of Permit Fee Inspectors Gross Revenue Inspector Expense Rev. vs Exp . that Goes to City Building Inspections 4,048,152 $ 911,788 $ 3,136,364 $ 77% Mechanical Inspections 651,651 $ 391,910 $ 259,741 $ 40% Electrical Inspections 418,874 $ 307,247 $ 111,627 $ 27% Plumbing Inspections 535,264 $ 324,631 $ 210,633 $ 39% Fire Inspections 466,842 $ 367,960 $ 98,882 $ 21% Total 6,120,782 $ 2,303,536 $ 3,817,246 $ 62% Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 15 of 64 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 16 of 64 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 17 of 64 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 18 of 64 City of Meridian City of Meridian City of Meridian City of Meridian Vacancy Report September 2017 Vacancy Report September 2017 Vacancy Report September 2017 Vacancy Report September 2017 Position Position Position Position FTE FTE FTE FTE Fund Fund Fund Fund Department Department Department Department HR Status HR Status HR Status HR Status Position Vacant Date Position Vacant Date Position Vacant Date Position Vacant Date Position Posted Position Posted Position Posted Position Posted Date Date Date Date Position Start Position Start Position Start Position Start Date Date Date Date HR Notes to Finance HR Notes to Finance HR Notes to Finance HR Notes to Finance Addressing Technician 1 Enterprise Building Offer Accepted New position as of 10/01/2017 8/24/2017 11/6/2017 Development Analyst I 1 Enterprise Building No Request to Fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Lead Account Clerk 1 Enterprise MUBS Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 8/23/2017 Not yet filled Public Works Inspector I 1 Enterprise PW Offer Accepted 7/21/2017 8/11/2017 10/23/2017 Staff Engineer 1 1 Enterprise PW Interviews in Progress 7/10/2017 7/12/2017 Not yet filled Management Analyst 1 Enterprise PW Offer Accepted 4/21/2017 5/2/2017 11/6/2017 Public Works Inspector I 1 Enterprise PW No Request to Fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 8/11/2017 Not yet filled Mechanic I 1 Enterprise PW - WW Accepting Applications 10/1/2017 09/14/2017/ Not yet filled Water Operator I 1 Enterprise PW-Water Accepting Applications 9/27/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Water Quality Specialist II 1 Enterprise PW-Water Internal Promotion New position as of 10/01/2017 8/25/2017 10/23/2017 Collection System Technician II 1 Enterprise PW-WW No Request to Fill at this time 8/21/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Wastewater Superintendent 1 Enterprise PW-WW Interviews in Progress 6/21/2017 6/27/2017 Not yet filled Building Maintenance Worker 1 General City Hall Accepting Applications New position as of 10/01/2017 9/1/2017 Not yet filled Community Development Director 1 General Community Development Accepting Applications 8/20/2017 8/18/2017 Not yet filled Administrative Assistant 1 General Finance Reviewing Applications New position as of 10/01/2017 8/23/2017 Not yet filled Financial Analyst 1 General Finance Accepting Applications New position as of 10/01/2017 8/23/2017 Not yet filled Firefighter Captain 1 General Fire Internal Promotion 8/21/2017 N/A 9/21/2017 Fire Fighter 1 General Fire Applications Under Review 9/21/2017 9/30/2017 Not yet filled Support Specialist 1 General IT Interviews in Progress 10/3/2017 9/27/2017 Not yet filled Support Specialist 1 General IT Internal Promotion 10/3/2017 9/27/2017 10/21/2017 Home Court Facility Specialist 0.5 General Parks Background in Progress 8/28/2017 8/24/2017 TBD Groundskeeper III 1 General Parks Not request to fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Home Court Facility Specialist 0.5 General Parks No Request to Fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Start recruitment in June Home Court Facility Specialist 0.5 General Parks No Request to Fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Start recruitment in June Recreation Camp Coordinator 1 General Parks No Request to Fill at this time New position as of 10/01/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Assistant City Planner 1 General Planning Offer Accepted 8/17/2017 8/7/2017 10/23/2017 Associate City Planner, Changed to Assistant City Planner 1 General Planning Offer Accepted New position as of 10/01/2017 8/7/2017 10/23/2017 Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress additional Interviews 6/20/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Corporal 1 General Police No Request to Fill at this time 10/1/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress additional Interviews 3/29/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Interviews Scheduled 9/15/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Corporal 1 General Police No Request to Fill at this time 10/1/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Interviews Scheduled 8/22/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress additional Interviews 3/27/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Police Officer 1 General Police Interviews Scheduled New position as of 10/01/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled Code Enforcement Officer 1 General Police Background in Progress New position as of 10/01/2017 5/17/2017 Not yet filled Building Maintenance Technician 1 General Public Works No Request to Fill at this time 8/25/2017 Not yet requested Not yet filled TOTAL FTE TOTAL FTE TOTAL FTE TOTAL FTE 41.5 41.5 41.5 41.5 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 19 of 64 VacantPositions Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n In t e r f u n d T r a n s f e r s FY 2 0 1 7 Ef f e c t i v e D a t e Ge n e r a l F u n d Enterprise Fund tr a n s f e r e x p e n s e t o E N T E R P R I S E F U N D ( w a t e r & s e w e r fu n d ) 15 % o f M a y o r ' s O f f i c e p e r s o n n e l c o s t s (e x c e p t M a y o r w a g e & b e n e f i t s ) t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 0 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f F i n a n c e e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 0 0 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f H R e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 0 2 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f I T e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 0 4 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f L e g a l e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 2 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 50 % o f I T C a p i t a l e x p e n s e t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u d FY 2 0 1 6 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e tr a n s f e r C i t y H a l l c o s t s t o t h e f o l l o w i n g : 13 % F i r e D e p a r t m e n t i n t h e G e n e r a l F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d 8. 4 2 % P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n i n t h e G e n e r a l F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d 12 . 9 2 % C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t i n t h e G e n e r a l F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d 23 . 0 8 % P u b l i c W o r k s i n t h e E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Pe r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r s : Bl d g D e p t M g r 5 0 % f r o m B u i l d i n g D e p a r t m e n t t o P u b l i c W or k s F Y 2 0 0 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Ca p i t a l P r o j e c t s M g r 5 0 % f r o m O t h e r G o v t t o P u b l i c W o r k s FY 2 0 0 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Co m m u n i c a t i o n s M g r 5 0 % f r o m O t h e r G o v t t o P u b l i c W o r k s FY 2 0 0 3 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 20 o f 6 4 Transfers City of Meridian IMPACT FUND BALANCE as of 09/30/2017 Account # Account Description Total Budget - Original Total Budget - Revised Current Year Actual Budget Remaining 2110 - Police Department REVENUES 34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 0.00 92,018.16 (92,018.16) 34780 Commercial Impact Revenue 20,000.00 0.00 85,213.73 (65,213.73) 34781 Residential Impact Revenue 176,436.00 0.00 193,104.56 (16,668.56) Total REVENUES 196,436.00 0.00 370,336.45 (173,900.45) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2210 - Fire Department REVENUES 34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 0.00 373,625.46 (373,625.46) 34780 Commercial Impact Revenue 60,000.00 0.00 353,028.31 (293,028.31) 34781 Residential Impact Revenue 500,000.00 0.00 784,172.61 (284,172.61) Total REVENUES 560,000.00 0.00 1,510,826.38 (950,826.38) 54000 Equipment & Supplies 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 92000 Cap Outlay - Bldg & Struct 0.00 3,971,500.00 0.00 3,971,500.00 94120 Capital - Fire Trucks 0.00 744,500.00 0.00 744,500.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 20,000.00 4,716,000.00 0.00 4,736,000.00 5200 - Parks & Recreation REVENUES 34781 Residential Impact Revenue 1,038,000.00 0.00 2,058,243.12 (1,020,243.12) 34920 Cash Donation for Capital Outlay 0.00 425,000.00 0.00 425,000.00 36100 Interest Earnings 15,000.00 0.00 140,974.94 (125,974.94) Total REVENUES 1,053,000.00 425,000.00 2,199,218.06 (721,218.06) 55000 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55102 Investment Services 0.00 0.00 2,267.42 (2,267.42) 92000 Cap Outlay - Bldgs & Struct 638,000.04 (638,000.04) 0.00 0.00 93405 Improvements @ Storey Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93415 Borup Property construction 71,859.24 0.00 160.00 71,699.24 96903 Settlers Park construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 96925 Keith Bird Legacy Park construction 637,294.92 963,498.04 1,028,548.76 572,244.20 96927 77 acre South Park 735,221.76 (38,592.30) 388,102.76 308,526.70 96928 Reta Huskey Park Construction 1,461,010.20 88,439.43 1,344,532.08 204,917.55 96929 Hillsdale Park Construction 1,459,923.72 270,336.84 1,181,579.06 548,681.50 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,003,309.88 645,681.97 3,945,190.08 1,703,801.77 TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES for FY2017 5,023,309.88 Dept FY2017 beginning fund balance FY2017 net change YTD Fund Balance YTD Police Department $ 801,948.00 370,336.45 1,172,284.45 $ Fire Department $ 3,597,216.00 1,510,826.38 5,108,042.38 $ Parks & Recreation $ 7,626,318.00 (1,745,972.02) 5,880,345.98 $ TOTAL IMPACT FUND BALANCE 12,025,482.00 135,190.81 12,160,672.81 Preliminary Report as of Nov 3, 2017 Page 21 of 64 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co u n c i l 1 1 2 0 - C o u n c i l Co u n c i l PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Co u n c i l A d m i n i s t r a t i v e W a g e s 6 1 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 8 3 6 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 1 , 5 8 3 Co u n c i l W a g e s 79 , 9 9 7 (7 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 9 , 9 9 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 Co u n c i l F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 10 , 7 8 6 0 3 1 5 3 , 7 3 2 7 , 0 5 4 6 5 . 4 0 % 3 , 7 6 3 Co u n c i l P E R S I 15 , 9 6 1 0 5 7 5 6 , 9 0 5 9 , 0 5 6 5 6 . 7 3 % 6 , 6 9 1 Co u n c i l W o r k e r s ' C o m p 51 6 0 2 4 9 4 4 2 2 8 1 . 8 7 % 9 2 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 9 9 , 4 0 0 0 6, 1 9 0 75 , 4 3 5 23,965 24.11%70,322 Co u n c i l T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 2 6 7 , 6 6 0 (7 0 , 0 0 0 ) 12 , 1 8 8 14 7 , 1 6 4 50,495 25.55%142,483 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Co u n c i l O f f i c e E x p e n s e 50 0 0 0 9 4 9 1 9 8 . 2 0 % 6 8 9 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 4 2 0 0 0 3 1 3 1 0 7 2 5 . 4 2 % 3 5 1 Co u n c i l C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 5 5 Co u n c i l C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 9 Co u n c i l P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 0 Co u n c i l P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 0 0 2 0 2 7 9 (279)0.00% 325 Co u n c i l B u s i n e s s M e a l s 3 , 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 , 8 8 0 1 2 0 3 . 9 8 % 3 , 9 9 3 Co u n c i l M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 2 9 7 1 7 0 . 9 8 % 5 2 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 7 , 4 0 5 0 0 2 , 8 4 3 4 , 5 6 2 6 1 . 6 0 % 3 , 7 2 1 Co u n c i l T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 3 , 3 2 0 0 0 1 , 2 7 8 2 , 0 4 2 6 1 . 5 1 % 1 , 3 5 7 Co u n c i l T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 5 , 6 1 1 0 0 3 , 0 8 5 2 , 5 2 6 4 5 . 0 1 % 2 , 2 5 8 Co u n c i l T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2 , 0 4 4 0 0 8 1 4 1 , 2 3 0 6 0 . 1 7 % 8 6 5 Co u n c i l C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 2 0 Co u n c i l L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 5 0 (50)0.00% 0 Co u n c i l P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 0 Co u n c i l H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 10 5 0 0 0 105 100.00%0 Co u n c i l T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 22 , 5 0 5 0 24 2 11 , 5 8 1 10,924 48.54%15,304 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 29 0 , 1 6 5 (7 0 , 0 0 0 ) 12 , 4 2 9 15 8 , 7 4 5 61,420 27.89%157,786 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l Tr a n s f e r s Co u n c i l P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (3 9 , 9 9 8 ) 0 0 0 (39,998)100.00%0 Co u n c i l T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (3 9 , 9 9 8 ) 0 0 0 (39,998)100.00%0 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 25 0 , 1 6 7 (7 0 , 0 0 0 ) 12 , 4 2 9 15 8 , 7 4 5 21,422 11.88%157,786 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 2 2 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Cl e r k 1 1 4 0 - C i t y C l e r k Cl e r k RE V E N U E S Cl e r k L i q u o r L i c e n s e R e v e n u e s 6 6 , 9 7 0 0 4 5 0 7 4 , 4 1 3 (7,443)(11.11)% 73,775 Cl e r k M i s c L i c e n s e s / P e r m i t s R e v e n u e s 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 3 9 1 9 , 9 2 1 (9,921)(99.20)% 19,348 Cl e r k D e p t S v c F e e s 4 0 , 0 0 0 (4 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k P a s s p o r t R e v e n u e s 0 4 0 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 2 5 7 8 , 0 7 5 (38,075)(95.18)% 55,050 Cl e r k R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 5 0 (50)0.00% 0 Cl e r k M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 80 26 0 (260)0.00%320 Cl e r k T o t a l R E V E N U E S 11 6 , 9 7 0 0 8, 8 9 4 17 2 , 7 1 8 (55,748)(47.66)%148,493 Cl e r k Cl e r k PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Cl e r k W a g e s 35 7 , 2 5 3 2 6 , 5 6 0 3 0 , 9 9 8 3 6 7 , 2 0 8 1 6 , 6 0 6 4 . 3 2 % 3 4 0 , 0 0 6 Cl e r k O v e r t i m e W a g e s 91 6 0 0 1 0 3 8 1 3 8 8 . 7 4 % 1 3 7 Cl e r k F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 27 , 4 0 0 2 , 0 3 2 2 , 2 3 6 2 6 , 8 3 5 2 , 5 9 7 8 . 8 2 % 2 4 , 4 9 6 Cl e r k P E R S I 40 , 5 4 5 3 , 0 0 7 3 , 5 0 9 4 1 , 5 8 0 1 , 9 7 2 4 . 5 2 % 3 8 , 0 6 5 Cl e r k W o r k e r s ' C o m p 1, 1 7 5 7 2 2 3 9 1 , 1 7 1 7 6 6 . 1 1 % 8 1 7 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 9 9 , 4 0 0 10 , 6 5 0 7, 7 3 8 92 , 1 9 2 17,858 16.22%90,237 Cl e r k T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 5 2 6 , 6 8 9 42 , 3 2 1 44 , 7 1 9 52 9 , 0 8 8 39,921 7.02%493,758 Cl e r k Cl e r k OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Cl e r k O f f i c e E x p e n s e 3 , 7 0 0 0 3 4 7 3 , 8 1 3 (113)(3.05)% 4,438 Cl e r k C o p i e r E x p e n s e 7 , 0 8 1 0 5 1 8 6 , 1 3 4 9 4 7 1 3 . 3 7 % 6 , 1 4 4 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 4 2 0 0 1 5 6 3 3 6 8 4 2 0 . 0 8 % 3 7 2 Cl e r k F u e l s - G a s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % (5) Cl e r k C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 5 Cl e r k C o d i f i c a t i o n E x p e n s e s 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 5 3 2 2 , 4 6 8 4 1 . 1 3 % 7 , 9 2 1 Cl e r k S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 5 , 5 2 2 0 6 , 2 9 0 1 7 , 7 8 6 7 , 7 3 6 3 0 . 3 1 % 9 , 3 4 0 Cl e r k E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1, 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 8 5 3 8 5 . 2 9 % 8 7 1 Cl e r k S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 1 , 1 1 7 Cl e r k F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 4 0 8 . 0 0 % 8 , 5 5 6 Cl e r k C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 3, 8 5 0 0 0 3 , 7 2 0 1 3 0 3 . 3 7 % 2 , 6 2 5 Cl e r k C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 6 1 1 8 , 9 3 7 1 , 0 6 3 5 . 3 1 % 1 9 , 2 9 8 Cl e r k B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 6 , 0 0 0 0 2 5 9 4 , 1 2 5 1 , 8 7 5 3 1 . 2 5 % 4 , 7 4 0 Cl e r k T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 3 3 Cl e r k P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 6 , 3 0 0 0 6 7 1 7 , 0 0 8 (708)(11.24)% 7,019 Cl e r k P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 0 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 2 3 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Cl e r k C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 6 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 % 2 9 1 Cl e r k B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 2 5 7 5 7 4 . 9 8 % 4 0 Cl e r k M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 0 0 2 2 5 6 (56)0.00% 17 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 , 7 6 0 0 0 1 , 1 4 0 3 , 6 2 0 7 6 . 0 5 % 1 , 8 8 5 Cl e r k T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 4 0 Cl e r k T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 3 5 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 0 9 7 Cl e r k T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2 0 1 0 0 7 7 1 2 5 6 1 . 9 4 % 6 9 0 Cl e r k C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 3 Cl e r k L e g a l N o t i c e s 2, 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 7 8 7 1 , 2 1 3 6 0 . 6 6 % 1 8 0 Cl e r k P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 2 9 Cl e r k D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 3 5 Cl e r k H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 10 5 0 0 1 1 4 (9)(8.09)% 105 Cl e r k E l e c t i o n s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%(1) Cl e r k T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 89 , 1 7 9 0 9, 6 2 7 68 , 5 8 5 20,594 23.09%88,456 Cl e r k Cl e r k DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 61 5 , 8 6 8 42 , 3 2 1 54 , 3 4 6 59 7 , 6 7 4 60,515 9.19%582,213 Cl e r k Cl e r k TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 61 5 , 8 6 8 42 , 3 2 1 54 , 3 4 6 59 7 , 6 7 4 60,515 9.19%582,213 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 2 4 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ma y o r 1 3 1 0 - M a y o r ' s O f f i c e Ma y o r RE V E N U E S Ma y o r R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 1 , 2 3 2 0 2 , 7 3 9 (1,507)(122.34)% 0 Ma y o r C o m m u n i t y E v e n t R e v / S p o n s o r s h i p 2 0 , 0 0 0 9 , 3 2 0 0 2 9 , 0 7 0 2 5 0 0 . 8 5 % 2 6 , 4 8 0 Ma y o r D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 5 , 0 0 0 11 , 0 1 5 1, 0 8 5 12 , 3 0 1 3,714 23.19%22,673 Ma y o r T o t a l R E V E N U E S 25 , 0 0 0 21 , 5 6 7 1, 0 8 5 44 , 1 1 0 2,457 5.28%49,153 Ma y o r Ma y o r PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Ma y o r A d m i n i s t r a t i v e W a g e s 9 0 , 9 5 9 0 7 , 5 8 0 8 9 , 8 7 3 1 , 0 8 6 1 . 1 9 % 8 5 , 5 9 4 Ma y o r W a g e s 22 1 , 0 1 0 4 , 3 9 2 1 7 , 8 2 8 2 1 7 , 9 6 2 7 , 4 4 0 3 . 3 0 % 2 1 2 , 1 9 8 Ma y o r W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 2 0 Ma y o r O v e r t i m e W a g e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 9 Ma y o r F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 23 , 8 6 6 3 3 6 1 , 8 5 8 2 2 , 4 1 5 1 , 7 8 7 7 . 3 8 % 2 1 , 5 1 3 Ma y o r P E R S I 35 , 3 1 5 4 9 7 2 , 8 7 6 3 4 , 1 0 0 1 , 7 1 3 4 . 7 8 % 3 3 , 6 9 1 Ma y o r W o r k e r s ' C o m p 1, 2 8 4 2 0 1 8 5 7 5 8 5 4 6 4 1 . 8 4 % 7 3 3 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 7 1 , 0 0 0 0 6, 0 3 6 72 , 1 1 0 (1,110)(1.56)%74,252 Ma y o r T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 4 4 3 , 4 3 4 5, 2 4 5 36 , 3 6 2 43 7 , 2 1 8 11,461 2.55%428,960 Ma y o r Ma y o r OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Ma y o r O f f i c e E x p e n s e 2 , 7 5 0 0 2 9 5 1 , 1 7 6 1 , 5 7 4 5 7 . 2 3 % 1 , 6 8 3 Ma y o r C o p i e r E x p e n s e 2 , 4 0 0 0 1 5 2 1 , 6 0 7 7 9 3 3 3 . 0 5 % 1 , 5 7 6 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 6 0 0 0 2 5 6 4 2 6 1 7 4 2 9 . 0 3 % 3 7 8 Ma y o r F u e l s - G a s 1, 5 0 0 0 1 4 8 7 3 2 7 6 8 5 1 . 2 1 % 6 9 3 Ma y o r C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 1 , 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 , 5 9 2 (592)(59.19)% 987 Ma y o r C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 8 , 3 0 0 1 3 , 7 3 5 2 , 9 1 6 1 9 , 6 0 3 2 , 4 3 2 1 1 . 0 3 % 1 5 , 4 8 4 Ma y o r V e h i c l e R e p a i r 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 4 Ma y o r V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 0 0 0 7 8 3 4 1 7 8 3 . 4 3 % 4 2 7 Ma y o r S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 , 9 7 3 0 0 5 6 0 1 , 4 1 3 7 1 . 6 1 % 8 3 6 Ma y o r M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 0 1 , 0 1 9 0 1 , 0 1 8 1 0 . 0 8 % 0 Ma y o r S c h o l a r s h i p s 0 4 , 0 0 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 , 0 0 0 Ma y o r E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 50 0 0 0 1 2 2 3 7 9 7 5 . 6 9 % 4 6 Ma y o r F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 7 5 4 2 5 8 5 . 0 0 % 4 3 5 Ma y o r C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2, 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 3 1 , 1 9 7 5 9 . 8 5 % 9 7 4 Ma y o r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 5 , 0 0 0 (1 , 0 0 0 ) 1, 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 7 5 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 2 5 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ma y o r P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 , 2 5 0 0 7 5 4 3 6 8 1 4 6 5 . 1 2 % 4 7 6 Ma y o r P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 4 0 0 4 7 3 5 8 (118)(49.17)% 216 Ma y o r C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 2 , 4 0 0 0 1 5 2 1 , 9 0 5 4 9 5 2 0 . 6 2 % 2 , 4 0 0 Ma y o r B u s i n e s s M e a l s 2 , 5 0 0 7 8 5 8 6 1 , 9 2 2 1 , 3 6 3 4 1 . 4 9 % 2 , 3 4 0 Ma y o r M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 2 5 0 0 8 2 2 1 2 9 1 1 . 5 8 % 2 3 0 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 0 , 4 7 5 (9 0 ) 0 7 , 5 9 2 2 , 7 9 3 2 6 . 8 9 % 5 , 6 1 9 Ma y o r T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 7 , 8 2 8 2 , 4 6 0 0 8 , 6 6 7 1 , 6 2 1 1 5 . 7 5 % 5 , 8 3 5 Ma y o r T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 9 , 6 2 4 2 , 3 2 5 0 1 0 , 9 7 5 9 7 4 8 . 1 4 % 8 , 2 5 9 Ma y o r T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2 , 8 3 5 (6 2 2 ) 14 8 1 , 8 4 8 3 6 6 1 6 . 5 1 % 1 , 1 2 8 Ma y o r C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 7 Ma y o r A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 2 5 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 9 1 . 9 9 % 0 Ma y o r L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 1 0 2 (102)0.00% 0 Ma y o r P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 6 0 0 0 0 8 8 6 (286)(47.59)% 4,120 Ma y o r B l d g & S t r u c t u r e s R e n t a l & L e a s e 35 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 1 , 1 5 7 0 0 1 , 0 9 8 5 9 5 . 0 8 % 1 , 4 3 8 Ma y o r H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 75 0 0 7 5 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 7 5 Ma y o r V o l u n t e e r A p p r e c i a t i o n e x p e n s e 5 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 0 0 0 31 (31)0.00%0 Ma y o r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 68 , 0 0 7 22 , 6 1 2 5, 8 8 9 68 , 9 3 1 21,688 23.93%60,215 Ma y o r Ma y o r DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 51 1 , 4 4 1 27 , 8 5 7 42 , 2 5 2 50 6 , 1 4 9 33,149 6.14%489,175 Ma y o r Ma y o r Tr a n s f e r s Ma y o r P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (7 7 , 5 8 7 ) 0 (6 , 2 0 7 ) (7 3 , 3 7 7 ) (4,210)5.42%(68,773) Ma y o r T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (7 7 , 5 8 7 ) 0 (6 , 2 0 7 ) (7 3 , 3 7 7 ) (4,210)5.43%(68,773) Ma y o r Ma y o r TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 43 3 , 8 5 4 27 , 8 5 7 36 , 0 4 5 43 2 , 7 7 2 28,939 6.26%420,402 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 2 6 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi n a n c e 1 5 0 0 - F i n a n c e D e p a r t m e n t Fi n a n c e PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Fi n a n c e W a g e s 61 4 , 9 3 4 (2 6 , 5 6 0 ) 46 , 4 7 8 5 7 0 , 4 4 5 1 7 , 9 2 9 3 . 0 4 % 6 1 4 , 3 9 0 Fi n a n c e O v e r t i m e W a g e s 0 0 6 3 1 3 6 (136)0.00% 474 Fi n a n c e F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 47 , 0 4 2 (2 , 0 3 2 ) 3, 3 9 6 4 1 , 7 0 8 3 , 3 0 2 7 . 3 3 % 4 5 , 0 5 9 Fi n a n c e P E R S I 69 , 6 1 0 (3 , 0 0 7 ) 5, 2 6 8 6 4 , 5 9 0 2 , 0 1 4 3 . 0 2 % 6 7 , 6 8 6 Fi n a n c e W o r k e r s ' C o m p 2, 5 2 5 (7 2 ) 38 9 1 , 5 3 5 9 1 8 3 7 . 4 2 % 1 , 5 6 4 Fi n a n c e E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 1 4 2 , 0 0 0 (1 0 , 6 5 0 ) 9, 3 5 7 11 2 , 0 2 6 19,324 14.71%113,171 Fi n a n c e T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 8 7 6 , 1 1 1 (4 2 , 3 2 1 ) 64 , 9 5 2 79 0 , 4 4 0 43,350 5.20%842,343 Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Fi n a n c e O f f i c e E x p e n s e 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 5 2 5 , 1 7 0 (170)(3.40)% 4,389 Fi n a n c e E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 6 0 0 0 8 4 6 0 4 (4)(0.60)% 604 Fi n a n c e C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 9 Fi n a n c e S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 5 , 9 2 4 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 2 1 , 2 3 1 9 , 6 9 3 3 1 . 3 4 % 1 0 , 7 5 5 Fi n a n c e E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 45 0 0 8 0 3 8 9 6 1 1 3 . 6 5 % 1 , 1 5 4 Fi n a n c e S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 36 , 0 0 0 (1 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 1 4 , 6 7 7 6 , 3 2 3 3 0 . 1 0 % 1 , 5 8 4 Fi n a n c e F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 6 3 Fi n a n c e C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 4, 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 7 2 0 2 8 0 6 . 9 9 % 0 Fi n a n c e P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 0 7 1 Fi n a n c e A u d i t & A c c o u n t i n g S e r v i c e s 5 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 4 7 , 0 0 0 5 , 5 0 0 1 0 . 4 7 % 4 6 , 0 0 0 Fi n a n c e I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 3 6 2 1 6 , 2 5 1 3 , 7 4 9 1 8 . 7 4 % 1 6 , 1 6 9 Fi n a n c e P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 2 , 8 0 0 0 1 8 2 2 , 2 6 5 5 3 5 1 9 . 1 0 % 2 , 1 3 5 Fi n a n c e C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 6 0 0 0 3 7 4 8 2 1 1 8 1 9 . 5 8 % 5 1 6 Fi n a n c e B u s i n e s s M e a l s 64 0 0 1 5 4 0 6 0 0 9 3 . 7 5 % 5 8 4 Fi n a n c e M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 0 0 2 8 1 9 3 (193)0.00% 95 Fi n a n c e E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 1 , 6 3 4 0 0 6 , 7 2 4 4 , 9 1 0 4 2 . 2 0 % 5 , 7 7 0 Fi n a n c e T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 0 0 0 0 3 7 5 5 2 4 5 2 4 . 4 8 % 6 4 4 Fi n a n c e T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 , 7 5 0 0 0 1 , 5 2 6 2 2 4 1 2 . 7 9 % 1 , 6 1 9 Fi n a n c e T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 6 0 0 0 0 5 6 6 3 4 5 . 6 6 % 6 3 1 Fi n a n c e C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 3 Fi n a n c e A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 0 0 0 9 5 (95)0.00% 0 Fi n a n c e L e g a l N o t i c e s 3, 0 0 0 0 3 , 7 4 2 5 , 8 1 6 (2,816)(93.85)% 1,427 Fi n a n c e P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 4 , 1 2 1 8 7 9 1 7 . 5 8 % 4 , 3 9 9 Fi n a n c e D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 3 , 0 0 1 0 0 1 , 0 6 5 1 , 9 3 6 6 4 . 5 2 % 1 , 9 5 0 Fi n a n c e H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 15 0 0 0 1 1 9 3 1 2 0 . 8 5 % 1 4 0 Fi n a n c e B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 0 0 0 16 7 (167)0.00%32 Fi n a n c e T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1 6 5 , 1 4 9 0 5, 6 8 5 13 2 , 9 7 6 32,173 19.48%103,642 Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 0 4 1 , 2 6 0 (4 2 , 3 2 1 ) 70 , 6 3 8 92 3 , 4 1 7 75,523 7.56%945,984 Fi n a n c e Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 2 7 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi n a n c e Tr a n s f e r s Fi n a n c e P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (4 3 8 , 0 5 6 ) 0 (3 2 , 2 8 1 ) ( 3 9 5 , 0 2 5 ) ( 4 3 , 0 3 1 ) 9.82%(423,244) Fi n a n c e O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (8 2 , 5 7 4 ) 0 (1 , 9 9 4 ) (5 0 , 5 2 7 ) (32,047)38.80%(43,187) Fi n a n c e T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (5 2 0 , 6 3 0 ) 0 (3 4 , 2 7 5 ) (4 4 5 , 5 5 3 ) (75,078)14.42%(466,431) Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 52 0 , 6 3 0 (4 2 , 3 2 1 ) 36 , 3 6 2 47 7 , 8 6 4 445 0.09%479,553 Fi n a n c e Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 2 8 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual IT 1 5 1 0 - I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y IT RE V E N U E S IT S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%380 IT T o t a l R E V E N U E S 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%380 IT IT PE R S O N N E L C O S T S IT W a g e s 93 1 , 9 6 9 0 7 5 , 5 8 7 8 7 7 , 6 4 7 5 4 , 3 2 2 5 . 8 2 % 7 6 9 , 0 3 3 IT W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 1 9 , 2 0 0 0 7 5 8 1 4 , 3 9 8 4 , 8 0 2 2 5 . 0 1 % 8 , 7 3 5 IT O v e r t i m e W a g e s 11 0 1 3 , 0 4 2 8 8 8 9 , 4 6 3 3 , 6 8 9 2 8 . 0 4 % 0 IT F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 72 , 7 7 2 9 9 8 5 , 5 5 2 6 4 , 8 8 8 8 , 8 8 2 1 2 . 0 4 % 5 6 , 3 5 2 IT P E R S I 10 5 , 5 1 0 1 , 4 7 6 8 , 6 5 7 1 0 0 , 0 8 8 6 , 8 9 8 6 . 4 4 % 8 6 , 8 7 2 IT W o r k e r s ' C o m p 6, 8 1 9 3 0 6 1 , 0 4 6 3 , 7 4 4 3 , 3 8 1 4 7 . 4 5 % 2 , 2 6 7 IT E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 2 1 3 , 0 0 0 0 17 , 1 9 9 20 3 , 5 6 3 9,437 4.43%184,130 IT T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 , 3 4 9 , 3 8 0 15 , 8 2 2 10 9 , 6 8 7 1, 2 7 3 , 7 9 1 91,411 6.70%1,107,389 IT IT OP E R A T I N G C O S T S IT O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1 , 2 0 0 0 3 0 6 9 9 3 2 0 7 1 7 . 2 8 % 8 9 0 IT C o p i e r E x p e n s e 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 3 , 2 9 6 8 2 . 3 9 % 2 , 2 2 0 IT E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 , 0 8 0 0 4 8 7 1 , 0 8 0 0 0 . 0 1 % 9 6 0 IT S a f e t y E x p e n s e 10 0 0 0 8 4 1 6 1 6 . 0 1 % 0 IT F u e l s - G a s 80 0 0 1 2 6 6 0 6 1 9 4 2 4 . 2 0 % 5 7 1 IT C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 9 IT V e h i c l e R e p a i r 50 0 0 0 4 2 2 7 8 1 5 . 5 9 % 4 0 5 IT V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 0 0 0 1 1 9 4 1 1 8 9 1 7 . 7 1 % 4 1 0 IT S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 4 3 , 0 0 5 0 7 , 7 8 8 1 4 5 , 3 0 0 (2,295)(1.60)% 135,685 IT E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 1 0 0 0 6 1 4 5 (45)(44.68)% 7 IT E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 40 , 0 0 0 (5 , 0 0 0 ) 82 3 0 , 1 6 2 4 , 8 3 8 1 3 . 8 2 % 7 , 8 7 9 IT S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 51 , 4 6 1 5 , 0 0 0 6 3 1 2 9 , 2 5 3 2 7 , 2 0 8 4 8 . 1 8 % 2 8 , 1 8 0 IT F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 1 , 8 0 0 0 8 3 9 1 1 , 2 3 7 5 6 3 4 . 7 7 % 6 , 9 4 0 IT C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 8, 6 0 0 0 0 8 , 9 0 9 (309)(3.59)% 20,041 IT P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 , 5 1 1 1 7 , 4 8 9 5 8 . 2 9 % 0 IT T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 1 7 , 8 0 0 0 1 , 2 6 2 1 5 , 1 4 6 2 , 6 5 4 1 4 . 9 0 % 1 5 , 1 0 3 IT P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 8 2 5 . 2 2 % 3 2 IT P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 1 , 8 0 0 0 1 7 5 1 , 9 5 0 (150)(8.35)% 1,645 IT C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 4 , 2 0 0 0 2 5 8 3 , 0 9 6 1 , 1 0 4 2 6 . 2 8 % 2 , 4 2 8 IT B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 2 6 8 6 7 . 9 8 % 5 6 IT E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 4 , 5 0 0 0 7 7 5 3 0 , 6 9 7 1 3 , 8 0 3 3 1 . 0 1 % 2 6 , 6 7 0 IT T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 8 , 0 0 0 0 3 2 6 2 , 3 1 1 5 , 6 8 9 7 1 . 1 1 % 7 , 7 6 7 IT T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 5 , 5 0 0 0 8 4 1 4 , 7 3 0 7 7 0 1 3 . 9 9 % 1 1 , 6 9 9 IT T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2 , 6 0 0 0 3 5 2 2 , 4 8 2 1 1 8 4 . 5 3 % 4 , 3 8 8 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 2 9 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual IT L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 2 IT P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 0 0 1 4 9 2 8 4 (284)0.00% 159 IT H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 27 0 0 0 27 0 0 0.00%231 IT T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 3 7 8 , 2 6 6 0 14 , 5 3 3 30 2 , 9 2 9 75,338 19.92%274,499 IT IT Ca p i t a l O u t l a y IT C a p i t a l - C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 100.00%81,361 IT T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 20 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 100.00%81,361 IT IT DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 7 4 7 , 6 4 6 15 , 8 2 2 12 4 , 2 1 9 1, 5 7 6 , 7 1 9 186,749 10.58%1,463,249 IT IT Tr a n s f e r s IT P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (6 7 4 , 6 9 0 ) 0 (5 4 , 4 2 6 ) ( 6 3 6 , 4 7 8 ) ( 3 8 , 2 1 2 ) 5.66%(551,916) IT O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (1 9 9 , 1 3 3 ) 0 (5 , 7 6 8 ) (1 4 6 , 9 6 6 ) (52,167)26.19%(188,685) IT T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (8 7 3 , 8 2 3 ) 0 (6 0 , 1 9 4 ) (7 8 3 , 4 4 4 ) (90,379)10.34%(740,601) IT IT TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 87 3 , 8 2 3 15 , 8 2 2 64 , 0 2 5 79 3 , 2 7 5 96,370 10.83%722,648 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 0 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Le g a l 1 5 2 0 - L e g a l D e p t Le g a l PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Le g a l W a g e s 50 1 , 9 7 3 0 4 1 , 2 0 8 5 0 1 , 3 4 5 6 2 8 0 . 1 2 % 4 8 9 , 6 2 0 Le g a l F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 38 , 4 0 1 0 3 , 0 0 7 3 6 , 4 5 3 1 , 9 4 8 5 . 0 7 % 3 5 , 6 3 8 Le g a l P E R S I 56 , 8 2 3 0 4 , 6 6 5 5 6 , 7 5 2 7 1 0 . 1 2 % 5 5 , 4 2 5 Le g a l W o r k e r s ' C o m p 1, 3 4 2 0 2 0 6 8 2 9 5 1 3 3 8 . 2 4 % 8 0 3 Le g a l E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 7 2 , 3 1 5 0 5, 1 9 0 65 , 3 9 4 6,921 9.57%70,917 Le g a l T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 6 7 0 , 8 5 4 0 54 , 2 7 6 66 0 , 7 7 3 10,081 1.50%652,403 Le g a l Le g a l OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Le g a l O f f i c e E x p e n s e 2 , 5 0 0 0 9 5 2 2 , 4 9 5 5 0 . 1 9 % 2 , 3 1 3 Le g a l E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 3 0 0 0 2 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 % 2 9 6 Le g a l C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 4 Le g a l S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 , 5 4 6 0 0 8 4 0 7 0 6 4 5 . 6 5 % 1 , 1 6 3 Le g a l E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 50 0 0 0 4 3 6 6 4 1 2 . 8 2 % 7 2 Le g a l F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 80 0 0 0 6 5 9 1 4 1 1 7 . 6 2 % 9 7 4 Le g a l P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 0 2 0 , 5 0 0 1 2 , 7 6 5 1 8 , 9 6 5 1 , 5 3 5 7 . 4 8 % 0 Le g a l L e g a l S e r v i c e s 3 0 , 0 0 0 4 0 , 0 0 0 6 , 2 8 9 6 5 , 5 5 1 4 , 4 4 9 6 . 3 5 % 5 6 , 7 8 9 Le g a l P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 5 0 0 4 1 0 7 4 3 2 8 . 8 3 % 5 8 Le g a l P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 4 0 0 2 0 2 3 8 2 0 . 7 7 % 2 1 6 Le g a l C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 , 8 0 0 0 8 4 1 , 0 0 8 7 9 2 4 4 . 0 0 % 1 , 1 3 4 Le g a l B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 2 1 7 5 2 5 2 5 . 0 1 % 1 5 4 Le g a l M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 2 1 9 3 7 6 . 7 1 % 1 2 6 Le g a l E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 , 0 0 0 0 1 9 5 1 , 0 9 4 2 , 9 0 6 7 2 . 6 4 % 1 , 5 2 8 Le g a l T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 8 2 Le g a l T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 1 3 2 Le g a l T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 5 0 0 0 0 7 7 4 2 4 8 4 . 7 0 % 6 0 8 Le g a l C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 3 Le g a l P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 1 0 , 1 6 2 0 9 4 8 7 , 4 7 6 2 , 6 8 6 2 6 . 4 2 % 1 0 , 5 9 7 Le g a l H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 75 0 0 72 3 3.53%85 Le g a l T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 55 , 4 2 3 60 , 5 0 0 21 , 5 2 2 99 , 4 8 6 16,437 14.18%79,174 Le g a l Le g a l DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 72 6 , 2 7 7 60 , 5 0 0 75 , 7 9 8 76 0 , 2 5 9 26,517 3.37%731,577 Le g a l Tr a n s f e r s Le g a l P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (3 3 5 , 4 2 7 ) 0 (2 7 , 0 3 5 ) ( 3 3 0 , 2 8 4 ) ( 5 , 1 4 3 ) 1.53%(325,807) Le g a l O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (2 7 , 7 1 2 ) 0 (5 , 8 9 0 ) (1 4 , 6 3 5 ) (13,077)47.19%(10,520) Le g a l T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (3 6 3 , 1 3 9 ) 0 (3 2 , 9 2 5 ) (3 4 4 , 9 1 8 ) (18,221)5.02%(336,327) Le g a l TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 36 3 , 1 3 8 60 , 5 0 0 42 , 8 7 3 41 5 , 3 4 1 8,297 1.95%395,250 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 1 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual HR 1 5 4 0 - H u m a n R e s o u r c e s HR RE V E N U E S HR R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 10 30 (30)0.00%0 HR T o t a l R E V E N U E S 0 0 10 30 (30)0.00%0 HR HR PE R S O N N E L C O S T S HR W a g e s 25 4 , 4 3 1 0 1 9 , 5 0 2 2 5 5 , 5 8 8 (1,157)(0.45)% 244,706 HR W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 , 2 3 5 2 , 7 6 5 1 3 . 8 2 % 2 1 , 1 5 9 HR F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 20 , 9 9 4 0 1 , 3 8 6 1 9 , 6 9 4 1 , 3 0 0 6 . 1 9 % 1 9 , 3 5 5 HR P E R S I 28 , 8 0 2 0 2 , 2 0 8 2 8 , 9 3 3 (131)(0.45)% 26,873 HR W o r k e r s ' C o m p 74 1 0 1 8 2 6 4 5 9 6 1 3 . 0 0 % 8 1 2 HR E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 1 3 6 , 0 0 0 0 11 , 8 7 8 12 6 , 1 0 9 9,891 7.27%122,744 HR T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 4 6 0 , 9 6 8 0 35 , 1 5 6 44 8 , 2 0 4 12,764 2.77%435,648 HR HR OP E R A T I N G C O S T S HR O f f i c e E x p e n s e 4 , 5 0 0 0 5 1 4 , 8 7 0 (370)(8.22)% 5,599 HR C o p i e r E x p e n s e 5 , 5 2 6 0 4 2 9 6 , 4 7 0 (944)(17.09)% 6,696 HR E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 3 0 0 0 2 4 7 2 4 4 5 6 1 8 . 6 3 % 2 8 8 HR C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 9 0 HR S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 9 , 2 0 0 0 0 1 5 , 5 8 0 3 , 6 2 0 1 8 . 8 5 % 1 1 , 1 5 6 HR E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 50 0 0 0 1 0 9 3 9 1 7 8 . 2 7 % 9 1 9 HR S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 , 4 5 5 HR F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 4 8 8 9 7 . 6 0 % 1 0 1 HR P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 3 8 , 5 0 0 1 4 , 0 0 0 1 , 6 2 0 1 3 , 2 1 0 3 9 , 2 9 0 7 4 . 8 3 % 2 3 , 5 9 6 HR B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 1 1 , 5 0 0 0 2 , 4 2 7 1 2 , 1 8 9 (689)(5.98)% 9,788 HR P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 4 0 0 0 2 2 2 9 6 1 0 4 2 6 . 0 1 % 2 8 0 HR P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 8 HR C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 2 , 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 , 3 2 0 1 , 0 8 0 4 5 . 0 0 % 1 , 4 0 5 HR B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 4 9 9 9 0 0 . 4 9 % 1 0 0 HR M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 8 8 7 . 9 9 % 1 2 HR E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 7 , 6 0 0 0 0 1 , 7 2 6 5 , 8 7 4 7 7 . 2 8 % 2 , 0 7 4 HR T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 0 0 0 7 7 (77)0.00% 0 HR C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 3 4 , 0 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 6 0 1 8 , 7 6 8 2 1 , 2 3 2 5 3 . 0 8 % 3 5 , 2 4 9 HR W e l l n e s s P r o g r a m 1 7 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 5 4 1 7 , 9 9 3 (993)(5.84)% 15,325 HR A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 1 4 , 0 0 0 0 3 , 6 2 0 1 8 , 9 9 2 (4,992)(35.65)% 13,221 HR L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 7 5 (75)0.00% 0 HR P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 5 0 0 0 0 9 9 3 (493)(98.58)% 1,049 HR D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 8 , 4 4 2 0 0 7 , 8 4 1 6 0 1 7 . 1 1 % 7 , 8 4 5 HR H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 75 0 0 0 7 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR E m p l o y e e E d u c a t i o n R e i m b u r s e m e n t 12 , 0 0 0 0 9 1 5 7 , 3 1 3 4 , 6 8 7 3 9 . 0 5 % 1 1 , 2 0 8 HR E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 5 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 6 0 7 3 , 8 9 3 7 0 . 7 8 % 7 6 1 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 2 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual HR T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1 8 2 , 8 8 3 20 , 0 0 0 14 , 6 1 6 12 9 , 7 9 5 73,088 36.02%156,337 HR HR DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 64 3 , 8 5 1 20 , 0 0 0 49 , 7 7 2 57 7 , 9 9 9 85,852 12.93%591,985 HR HR Tr a n s f e r s HR P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (1 9 7 , 9 8 4 ) 0 (1 7 , 4 8 7 ) ( 2 2 4 , 0 1 1 ) 26,027 (13.14)%(219,480) HR O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (9 1 , 4 4 2 ) 0 (6 , 0 0 4 ) (6 3 , 3 0 9 ) (28,133)30.76%(76,597) HR T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (2 8 9 , 4 2 6 ) 0 (2 3 , 4 9 1 ) (2 8 7 , 3 2 0 ) (2,106)0.73%(296,076) HR HR TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 35 4 , 4 2 5 20 , 0 0 0 26 , 2 8 1 29 0 , 6 7 9 83,746 22.36%295,909 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 3 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ot h G o v 1 8 4 0 - O t h e r G o v t / S t L i g h t i n g Ot h G o v RE V E N U E S Ot h G o v G e n e r a l P r o p e r t y T a x R e v e n u e 2 8 , 2 8 0 , 3 2 2 0 2 1 , 3 9 5 2 8 , 8 5 4 , 1 5 3 (5 7 3 , 8 3 1 ) (2.02)% 26,634,071 Ot h G o v G a s F r a n c h i s e R e v e n u e 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 8 3 , 4 7 9 7 2 6 , 3 6 3 (1 2 6 , 3 6 3 ) (21.06)% 655,389 Ot h G o v C a b l e T V F r a n c h i s e R e v e n u e 2 2 5 , 0 0 0 0 5 5 , 9 7 2 2 3 0 , 2 9 5 (5,295)(2.35)% 229,090 Ot h G o v E l e c t r i c i t y F r a n c h i s e R e v e n u e 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 2 8 , 7 7 5 6 4 1 , 8 0 3 (1 4 1 , 8 0 3 ) (28.36)% 579,790 Ot h G o v G r a n t R e v e n u e s 3 5 6 , 3 2 4 3 7 3 , 5 2 7 6 9 , 2 9 3 2 6 6 , 0 4 8 4 6 3 , 8 0 3 6 3 . 5 4 % 1 9 4 , 3 6 2 Ot h G o v R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 1 8 2 (182)0.00% 0 Ot h G o v S t a t e R e v e n u e S h a r i n g R e v e n u e 4 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 7 9 0 , 0 3 6 6 , 0 8 1 , 2 8 5 (1 , 5 8 1 , 2 8 5 ) (35.13)% 5,498,923 Ot h G o v S t a t e L i q u o r A p p o r t i o n m e n t R e v e n u e 60 8 , 9 8 0 0 2 0 3 , 1 4 4 8 9 6 , 2 8 5 (2 8 7 , 3 0 5 ) (47.17)% 717,141 Ot h G o v R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 0 4 3 6 (436)0.00% 0 Ot h G o v M e r i d i a n D o w n t o w n D e v e l o p m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 6 , 7 1 7 Ot h G o v R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 0 3 2 , 2 3 4 (32,234)0.00% 12,238 Ot h G o v R e n t a l I n c o m e 0 0 0 1 8 8 (188)0.00% 0 Ot h G o v D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 9 , 8 7 4 Ot h G o v M A C A r t s C o m m i s s i o n R e v e n u e s 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 8 , 5 8 0 0 1 3 , 6 1 2 1 4 , 9 6 8 5 2 . 3 7 % 2 4 , 7 1 0 Ot h G o v M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 8 9 7 Ot h G o v I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 1 7 7 , 0 0 0 0 5 2 , 4 0 4 4 0 3 , 5 9 2 (2 2 6 , 5 9 2 ) (128.01)% 283,689 Ot h G o v U n r e a l i z e d G a i n o n I n v e s t m e n t s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%30,592 Ot h G o v T o t a l R E V E N U E S 35 , 2 5 7 , 6 2 6 39 2 , 1 0 7 2, 5 0 4 , 4 9 8 38 , 1 4 6 , 4 7 5 (2 , 4 9 6 , 7 4 2 ) (7.00)%34,978,482 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Ot h G o v W a g e s 14 2 , 1 4 8 0 1 1 , 8 3 6 1 4 1 , 6 9 6 4 5 2 0 . 3 1 % 1 3 3 , 3 0 0 Ot h G o v W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 6 , 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 4 , 8 8 4 1 , 1 1 6 1 8 . 6 0 % 3 , 3 6 8 Ot h G o v F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 11 , 3 3 4 0 9 1 3 1 0 , 8 7 4 4 6 0 4 . 0 6 % 1 0 , 0 9 3 Ot h G o v P E R S I 16 , 0 9 1 0 1 , 3 4 0 1 6 , 0 4 0 5 1 0 . 3 1 % 1 5 , 0 8 9 Ot h G o v W o r k e r s ' C o m p 3, 0 0 9 0 5 9 5 2 , 1 4 4 8 6 5 2 8 . 7 5 % 3 , 3 9 8 Ot h G o v E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 2 8 , 4 0 0 0 2, 3 5 0 28 , 1 9 5 205 0.72%27,895 Ot h G o v T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 2 0 6 , 9 8 2 0 17 , 4 8 4 20 3 , 8 3 1 3,150 1.52%193,143 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Ot h G o v O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1 , 5 0 0 0 1 7 1 1 , 0 3 1 4 6 9 3 1 . 2 4 % 1 , 3 1 5 Ot h G o v C o p i e r E x p e n s e 7 , 2 2 6 (1 0 ) 0 3 , 5 9 2 3 , 6 2 4 5 0 . 2 2 % 1 0 , 0 5 2 Ot h G o v E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 8 0 0 9 1 4 8 3 2 1 7 . 7 0 % 1 3 2 Ot h G o v S a f e t y E x p e n s e 0 0 0 6 4 0 (640)0.00% 0 Ot h G o v F u e l s - G a s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 1 Ot h G o v C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 5 Ot h G o v C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 2 0 , 0 0 0 (1 2 , 9 6 1 ) 0 7 , 0 3 9 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 2 , 5 0 0 0 3 7 4 2 , 8 4 6 (346)(13.83)% 1,506 Ot h G o v P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 2 , 5 0 0 0 3 6 5 3 6 5 2 , 1 3 5 8 5 . 3 9 % 4 , 4 8 5 Ot h G o v S t r e e t L i g h t / S i g n s R e p a i r s / M a i n t e n a n c e 30 , 0 0 1 0 4 , 0 8 3 2 2 , 1 9 6 7 , 8 0 6 2 6 . 0 1 % 2 3 , 3 8 4 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 4 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ot h G o v G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 3 3 0 0 1 5 0 1 , 3 7 9 (1,049)(317.89)% 313 Ot h G o v A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 1 , 2 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 6 7 1 3 3 1 1 . 0 6 % 1 , 0 6 7 Ot h G o v H i s t o r i c a l P r e s e r v a t i o n 1 6 , 0 2 5 3 , 5 0 0 2 , 7 9 3 1 2 , 9 4 9 6 , 5 7 6 3 3 . 6 8 % 1 1 6 Ot h G o v M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 2 0 , 0 0 0 (1 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S e r v i c e s 1 6 0 , 1 9 4 0 0 1 6 0 , 1 9 4 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 7 7 , 2 4 3 Ot h G o v S e n i o r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 1 3 9 5 , 4 9 6 2 4 , 5 0 5 8 1 . 6 8 % 3 4 , 8 9 6 Ot h G o v R e c y c l e F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n s 0 0 0 5 0 0 (500)0.00% 0 Ot h G o v A l l u m b a u g h H o u s e 5 7 , 4 6 0 3 , 5 0 3 0 6 0 , 9 6 3 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 7 , 4 6 0 Ot h G o v E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 1 7 9 , 0 0 0 5 2 , 0 0 0 1 6 , 5 8 7 1 0 8 , 7 3 2 1 2 2 , 2 6 8 5 2 . 9 2 % 3 0 , 1 0 5 Ot h G o v E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 25 0 3 , 0 0 0 1 , 9 0 9 3 , 3 1 0 (60)(1.84)% 507 Ot h G o v C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 0 1 , 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 1 5 0 1 5 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 1 1 2 , 7 3 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 2 4 , 0 0 0 8 9 , 7 3 0 7 8 . 8 9 % 1 0 , 9 5 7 Ot h G o v A r t s C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e s 2 6 , 5 0 1 1 6 , 8 3 3 2 , 3 2 8 3 5 , 4 3 0 7 , 9 0 4 1 8 . 2 4 % 4 7 , 2 2 1 Ot h G o v A r t i n P u b l i c S p a c e s 0 6 5 0 0 0 6 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 0 0 0 7 2 , 7 1 0 (72,710)0.00% 0 Ot h G o v T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 0 0 6 9 7 6 9 (769)0.00% 739 Ot h G o v P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 3 , 9 7 5 0 0 2 , 6 5 8 1 , 3 1 7 3 3 . 1 2 % 3 , 3 9 3 Ot h G o v C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 6 0 0 0 6 4 5 6 8 3 2 5 . 2 6 % 1 , 0 6 7 Ot h G o v B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 9 9 1 9 0 . 9 1 % 8 1 Ot h G o v M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 Ot h G o v E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 , 0 2 5 0 0 3 9 9 6 2 6 6 1 . 0 7 % 7 4 5 Ot h G o v T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 6 5 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 3 4 Ot h G o v T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 8 5 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 7 8 Ot h G o v T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 2 4 Ot h G o v A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 7 , 4 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 1 , 7 5 5 8 , 4 9 9 5 5 1 6 . 0 9 % 3 , 0 0 0 Ot h G o v P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 1 , 8 5 0 (1 , 6 0 0 ) 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 2 2 Ot h G o v I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 0 0 (3 , 6 8 8 ) 12 , 5 0 0 (12,500)0.00% 7,740 Ot h G o v E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 3 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 6 , 6 1 1 3 1 6 , 9 2 8 3 , 0 7 2 0 . 9 6 % 2 9 8 , 0 1 0 Ot h G o v E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 0 0 0 3 0 0 (300)0.00% 0 Ot h G o v D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 7 2 , 5 6 7 0 5 6 4 , 7 3 1 7 , 8 3 6 1 0 . 7 9 % 6 5 , 8 2 9 Ot h G o v I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 3 0 0 0 0 1 6 3 1 3 7 4 5 . 5 3 % 3 2 7 Ot h G o v A D A C o m p l i a n c e 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 9 2 1 1 , 3 1 1 8 , 6 8 9 8 6 . 8 8 % 1 , 0 1 7 Ot h G o v H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 45 0 0 4 4 1 3 . 1 5 % 3 3 Ot h G o v M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 4 , 1 3 0 2 0 0 3 , 3 4 4 8 0 6 1 9 . 4 2 % 2 , 5 6 5 Ot h G o v V o l u n t e e r A p p r e c i a t i o n e x p e n s e 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 6 8 0 1 , 8 2 0 7 2 . 7 8 % 3 , 4 8 7 Ot h G o v G r a n t E x p e n d i t u r e s 3 5 6 , 3 2 4 37 0 , 0 2 7 62 , 0 8 0 27 0 , 7 4 9 455,602 62.72%194,362 Ot h G o v T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1 , 4 5 0 , 6 6 2 42 3 , 5 6 2 11 9 , 7 2 7 1, 2 1 4 , 0 8 8 660,136 35.22%985,000 Ot h G o v Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 5 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ot h G o v Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Ot h G o v Ot h G o v C a p i t a l - S i g n s / A r t 1 8 6 , 6 9 4 (6 0 , 5 2 9 ) 0 31 , 5 0 0 94,665 75.03%112,961 Ot h G o v T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 18 6 , 6 9 4 (6 0 , 5 2 9 ) 0 31 , 5 0 0 94,665 75.03%112,961 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 8 4 4 , 3 3 8 36 3 , 0 3 3 13 7 , 2 1 0 1, 4 4 9 , 4 2 0 757,952 34.33%1,291,104 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v Tr a n s f e r s Ot h G o v P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (1 0 3 , 4 9 1 ) 0 (8 , 4 4 4 ) ( 1 0 0 , 8 4 7 ) ( 2 , 6 4 4 ) 2.55%(99,394) Ot h G o v O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d 0 (3 7 , 5 0 0 ) 0 0 (37,500)100.00%0 Ot h G o v T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (1 0 3 , 4 9 1 ) (3 7 , 5 0 0 ) (8 , 4 4 4 ) (1 0 0 , 8 4 7 ) (40,144)28.47%(99,394) Ot h G o v Ot h G o v In t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s Ot h G o v O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r I n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % (3,043,921) Ot h G o v T r a n s f e r o f E q u i t y (3 7 , 5 0 0 ) 37 , 5 0 0 0 (2 , 2 7 5 , 0 5 4 ) 2, 2 7 5 , 0 5 4 0.00%353,986 Ot h G o v T o t a l I n t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s (3 7 , 5 0 0 ) 37 , 5 0 0 0 (2 , 2 7 5 , 0 5 4 ) 2, 2 7 5 , 0 5 4 0.00%(2,689,935) Ot h G o v Ot h G o v TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 7 0 3 , 3 4 7 36 3 , 0 3 3 12 8 , 7 6 6 (9 2 6 , 4 8 1 ) 2, 9 9 2 , 8 6 1 144.83%(1,498,225) Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 6 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ci t y H a l l 1 8 5 0 - C i t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l RE V E N U E S Ci t y H a l l R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 4 8 7 (487)0.00% 504 Ci t y H a l l R e n t a l I n c o m e 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 6 8 1 2 0 , 1 1 2 (112)(0.55)% 19,932 Ci t y H a l l M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 1 (1)0.00% 3,221 Ci t y H a l l S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%2,784 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l R E V E N U E S 20 , 0 0 0 0 1, 6 8 1 20 , 6 0 1 (601)(3.00)%26,441 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Ci t y H a l l W a g e s 10 3 , 4 3 6 0 4 , 2 2 2 1 0 3 , 3 1 8 1 1 8 0 . 1 1 % 1 0 1 , 0 1 7 Ci t y H a l l O v e r t i m e W a g e s 45 2 0 1 7 1 , 0 2 6 (574)(127.01)% 982 Ci t y H a l l F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 7, 9 4 7 0 3 2 4 7 , 6 1 0 3 3 7 4 . 2 4 % 7 , 4 2 8 Ci t y H a l l P E R S I 11 , 7 6 0 0 4 8 0 1 1 , 4 2 9 3 3 1 2 . 8 1 % 1 1 , 5 4 6 Ci t y H a l l W o r k e r s ' C o m p 3, 7 7 1 0 6 7 9 2 , 8 3 0 9 4 1 2 4 . 9 4 % 2 , 4 6 1 Ci t y H a l l E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 2 8 , 4 0 0 0 62 9 22 , 4 3 0 5,970 21.02%23,374 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 5 5 , 7 6 6 0 6, 3 5 2 14 8 , 6 4 3 7,123 4.57%146,809 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Ci t y H a l l O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1 , 2 0 0 0 3 , 1 0 2 3 , 2 4 5 (2,045)(170.41)% 806 Ci t y H a l l E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 2 0 0 1 9 3 3 8 7 7 2 . 6 2 % 1 0 3 Ci t y H a l l J a n i t o r i a l 12 7 , 1 5 0 9 , 0 0 0 7 , 5 9 4 1 0 3 , 4 5 0 3 2 , 7 0 0 2 4 . 0 1 % 1 1 2 , 1 6 9 Ci t y H a l l S a f e t y E x p e n s e 30 0 0 0 2 8 2 7 2 9 0 . 5 4 % 2 4 Ci t y H a l l S h o p S u p p l i e s 2, 5 0 0 0 0 6 8 6 1 , 8 1 4 7 2 . 5 7 % 1 , 1 6 6 Ci t y H a l l F u e l s - G a s 1, 0 0 0 0 1 5 5 8 9 3 1 0 7 1 0 . 6 9 % 6 3 1 Ci t y H a l l C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 7 7 8 8 . 6 7 % 1 7 8 Ci t y H a l l M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 0 0 1 6 3 7 4 (374)0.00% 309 Ci t y H a l l B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 1 0 9 , 0 7 1 5 3 , 1 4 3 2 0 , 3 4 8 8 5 , 7 5 2 7 6 , 4 6 2 4 7 . 1 3 % 9 5 , 7 2 9 Ci t y H a l l P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 6 , 4 3 0 0 4 5 8 6 , 4 2 8 2 0 . 0 3 % 7 , 8 6 8 Ci t y H a l l V e h i c l e R e p a i r 2 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 1 , 8 8 1 9 4 . 0 5 % 2 7 7 Ci t y H a l l V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 , 0 0 0 0 8 2 3 7 2 1 , 6 2 8 8 1 . 4 0 % 2 1 0 Ci t y H a l l E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 2 0 0 0 0 1 5 7 4 3 2 1 . 6 9 % 3 9 2 Ci t y H a l l A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 1 7 , 1 7 7 0 1 , 2 9 6 1 5 , 2 1 0 1 , 9 6 7 1 1 . 4 5 % 1 4 , 0 6 7 Ci t y H a l l E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 4 , 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 4 , 3 2 5 (326)(8.13)% 3,704 Ci t y H a l l E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1, 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 , 4 8 9 9 9 . 2 6 % 1 2 , 4 5 8 Ci t y H a l l S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 7 0 Ci t y H a l l F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 6 7 Ci t y H a l l C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 1, 5 5 0 0 0 1 , 4 3 7 1 1 3 7 . 3 0 % 9 7 4 Ci t y H a l l T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 3 5 0 0 1 7 4 1 , 9 7 9 (1,629)(465.23)% 1,895 Ci t y H a l l P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 3 , 4 9 2 0 8 9 2 3 , 3 9 3 9 9 2 . 8 2 % 3 , 6 8 1 Ci t y H a l l P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 4 8 0 0 0 1 2 7 3 5 3 7 3 . 4 7 % 0 Ci t y H a l l C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 , 2 0 0 0 2 6 1 , 0 9 8 1 0 2 8 . 4 9 % 9 3 8 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 7 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ci t y H a l l E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 3 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 4 6 Ci t y H a l l T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 7 3 (73)0.00% 0 Ci t y H a l l P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 2 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 1 , 8 3 1 9 1 . 5 2 % 1 , 5 0 1 Ci t y H a l l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 2 1 , 6 4 6 0 0 1 9 , 0 4 6 2 , 6 0 0 1 2 . 0 1 % 2 1 , 3 2 3 Ci t y H a l l E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 9 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 7 6 7 9 4 , 0 6 5 9 3 5 0 . 9 8 % 8 9 , 8 5 1 Ci t y H a l l I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 3 7 5 1 3 , 1 8 4 1 , 8 1 6 1 2 . 1 0 % 1 3 , 1 2 4 Ci t y H a l l E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 6 5 Ci t y H a l l B l d g & S t r u c t u r e s R e n t a l & L e a s e 20 , 3 1 2 0 1 , 6 9 3 2 0 , 2 6 2 5 0 0 . 2 4 % 1 9 , 6 7 2 Ci t y H a l l D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 1 , 3 7 8 0 0 7 0 9 6 6 9 4 8 . 5 4 % 9 7 3 Ci t y H a l l I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 2 0 0 0 0 3 4 6 (146)(73.11)% 139 Ci t y H a l l H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 30 0 0 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 Ci t y H a l l P e n a l t i e s / S e t t l e m e n t s / F o r f e i t u r e s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%8 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 4 4 1 , 4 3 6 62 , 1 4 3 47 , 2 2 6 37 7 , 0 2 5 126,554 25.13%406,148 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Ci t y H a l l I m p r o v e m e n t - p a v e m e n t s i d e w a l k s 27 , 2 0 8 0 0 0 2 7 , 2 0 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 0 , 2 0 4 Ci t y H a l l C I P - M u n i c i p a l C e n t e r 5 1 3 , 4 8 3 (6 9 , 3 8 7 ) 23 , 7 8 8 34 5 , 5 7 5 98,521 22.18%59,858 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 54 0 , 6 9 1 (6 9 , 3 8 7 ) 23 , 7 8 8 34 5 , 5 7 5 125,729 26.68%100,062 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 1 3 7 , 8 9 3 (7 , 2 4 4 ) 77 , 3 6 5 87 1 , 2 4 4 259,406 22.94%653,019 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l Tr a n s f e r s Ci t y H a l l P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (8 9 , 4 4 1 ) 0 (3 , 2 5 7 ) ( 8 4 , 8 7 7 ) ( 4 , 5 6 4 ) 5.10%(84,184) Ci t y H a l l O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (2 4 1 , 0 4 3 ) 0 (2 2 , 6 8 2 ) (2 1 4 , 9 0 2 ) (26,141)10.84%(242,059) Ci t y H a l l T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (3 3 0 , 4 8 4 ) 0 (2 5 , 9 3 9 ) (2 9 9 , 7 7 9 ) (30,705)9.29%(326,243) Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 80 7 , 4 0 9 (7 , 2 4 4 ) 51 , 4 2 6 57 1 , 4 6 4 228,701 28.58%326,776 Ci t y H a l l Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 8 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co m m D e v 1 9 1 0 - C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p t s Co m m D e v RE V E N U E S Co m m D e v B l d g P e r m i t s - R e s i d e n t i a l R e v e n u e 1, 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 7 6 , 6 7 4 2 , 1 7 4 , 4 3 0 (8 7 4 , 4 3 0 ) (67.26)% 1,973,959 Co m m D e v P l u m b i n g P e r m i t R e v e n u e s 3 2 5 , 0 0 0 0 4 6 , 1 0 3 5 3 5 , 2 6 4 (2 1 0 , 2 6 4 ) (64.69)% 456,271 Co m m D e v M e c h a n i c a l P e r m i t R e v e n u e s 4 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 6 1 , 2 6 4 6 5 1 , 6 5 1 (2 0 1 , 6 5 1 ) (44.81)% 610,167 Co m m D e v E l e c t r i c a l P e r m i t R e v e n u e s 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 3 , 6 3 6 4 1 8 , 8 7 4 (1 6 8 , 8 7 4 ) (67.54)% 417,059 Co m m D e v F i r e I n s p e c t i o n & P e r m i t F e e s 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 7 , 5 0 7 4 5 3 , 3 5 3 (1 5 3 , 3 5 3 ) (51.11)% 351,259 Co m m D e v B l d g P e r m i t s - M u l t i f a m i l y R e v e n u e 40 , 0 0 0 0 3 2 , 3 2 5 5 4 0 , 6 8 3 (5 0 0 , 6 8 3 ) (1,251.70)%113,217 Co m m D e v B l d g P e r m i t s - C o m m e r c i a l R e v e n u e 85 0 , 0 0 0 0 7 0 , 0 2 3 1 , 3 3 3 , 0 3 9 (4 8 3 , 0 3 9 ) (56.82)% 1,354,608 Co m m D e v F l o o d P l a i n P e r m i t R e v e n u e 0 0 0 3 2 5 (325)0.00% 500 Co m m D e v F i l i n g F e e s - R e v e n u e s 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 4 , 5 1 5 4 1 4 , 2 7 5 (2 1 4 , 2 7 5 ) (107.13)% 434,337 Co m m D e v G r a n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 2 1 4 1 6 , 3 4 0 (16,340)0.00% 27,276 Co m m D e v R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 2 , 3 9 5 (2,395)0.00% 20 Co m m D e v M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 20 38 0 (380)0.00%300 Co m m D e v T o t a l R E V E N U E S 3, 7 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 47 2 , 2 8 1 6, 5 4 1 , 0 0 8 (2 , 8 2 6 , 0 0 8 ) (76.07)%5,738,973 Co m m D e v Co m m D e v PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Co m m D e v W a g e s 98 1 , 0 8 0 0 6 7 , 6 3 6 9 3 6 , 7 0 0 4 4 , 3 8 0 4 . 5 2 % 8 9 7 , 2 6 5 Co m m D e v W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 0 0 2 , 5 7 7 2 7 , 8 9 3 (27,893)0.00% 22,485 Co m m D e v O v e r t i m e W a g e s 33 2 0 0 1 9 3 1 3 9 4 1 . 8 8 % 1 5 1 Co m m D e v F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 74 , 8 7 4 0 5 , 1 4 3 7 1 , 1 0 2 3 , 7 7 2 5 . 0 3 % 6 7 , 9 7 9 Co m m D e v P E R S I 11 0 , 7 9 3 0 7 , 9 4 8 1 0 8 , 0 5 2 2 , 7 4 1 2 . 4 7 % 1 0 4 , 1 3 3 Co m m D e v W o r k e r s ' C o m p 4, 3 9 1 0 1 , 7 0 3 4 , 6 6 9 (278)(6.32)% 2,553 Co m m D e v E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 2 1 3 , 0 0 0 0 1 3 , 7 9 2 1 7 7 , 2 4 3 3 5 , 7 5 7 1 6 . 7 8 % 1 7 7 , 6 7 2 Co m m D e v U n e m p l o y m e n t 0 0 89 2 7, 3 5 6 (7,356)0.00%0 Co m m D e v T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 , 3 8 4 , 4 7 0 0 99 , 6 9 0 1, 3 3 3 , 2 0 9 51,262 3.70%1,272,238 Co m m D e v Co m m D e v OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Co m m D e v O f f i c e E x p e n s e 3 , 5 0 0 0 3 9 9 3 , 3 9 7 1 0 3 2 . 9 4 % 4 , 8 1 2 Co m m D e v C o p i e r E x p e n s e 7 , 0 9 6 0 6 5 8 6 , 9 2 8 1 6 8 2 . 3 6 % 7 , 0 7 8 Co m m D e v E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 , 5 6 0 0 4 8 2 7 3 1 8 2 9 5 3 . 1 1 % 9 6 9 Co m m D e v F u e l s - G a s 50 0 0 2 9 1 7 4 3 2 6 6 5 . 2 7 % 2 8 7 Co m m D e v C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 3 1 Co m m D e v C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 1 1 Co m m D e v B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 1 , 8 0 0 (1 , 8 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m m D e v V e h i c l e R e p a i r 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m m D e v V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 0 0 0 1 5 2 1 8 2 8 3 5 6 . 5 0 % 9 5 Co m m D e v S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 0 , 2 1 0 0 7 5 8 1 9 , 5 8 2 6 2 8 3 . 1 0 % 2 0 , 9 3 2 Co m m D e v M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 (1,000)0.00% 0 Co m m D e v E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 2, 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 8 7 1 1 , 1 2 9 5 6 . 4 5 % 6 1 5 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 3 9 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co m m D e v S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 70 0 3 , 2 8 5 1 , 5 7 5 2 , 8 6 8 1 , 1 1 7 2 8 . 0 3 % 1 1 , 3 1 8 Co m m D e v F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 6 2 4 (124)(24.79)% 1,838 Co m m D e v C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 6, 6 5 0 0 0 6 , 1 7 0 4 8 0 7 . 2 1 % 3 1 , 7 1 1 Co m m D e v P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 1 3 9 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 , 8 3 8 1 0 2 , 1 6 3 7 3 . 4 9 % 3 5 , 0 5 5 Co m m D e v C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 4 3 , 5 0 0 0 4 , 8 2 7 1 1 , 4 5 7 3 2 , 0 4 3 7 3 . 6 6 % 6 , 1 8 5 Co m m D e v A r t i n P u b l i c S p a c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 3 , 4 3 5 Co m m D e v B u i l d i n g I n s p e c t i o n s 6 5 0 , 4 7 5 0 6 1 , 2 3 5 9 1 1 , 7 8 8 (2 6 1 , 3 1 3 ) (40.17)% 716,715 Co m m D e v M e c h a n i c a l I n s p e c t i o n s 2 9 2 , 5 0 0 0 3 6 , 7 5 8 3 9 1 , 9 1 0 (99,410)(33.98)% 397,023 Co m m D e v E l e c t r i c a l I n s p e c t i o n s 1 6 2 , 5 0 0 0 2 3 , 5 4 5 3 0 7 , 2 4 7 (1 4 4 , 7 4 7 ) (89.07)% 273,128 Co m m D e v P l u m b i n g I n s p e c t i o n s 1 9 5 , 0 0 0 0 2 7 , 6 6 2 3 2 4 , 6 3 1 (1 2 9 , 6 3 1 ) (66.47)% 274,697 Co m m D e v F i r e I n s p e c t i o n s 4 1 3 , 9 1 0 0 2 0 , 1 2 7 3 6 7 , 9 6 0 4 5 , 9 5 0 1 1 . 1 0 % 2 5 8 , 7 1 9 Co m m D e v T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 9 7 Co m m D e v P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 7 5 0 0 1 8 4 2 4 3 2 6 4 3 . 4 6 % 5 4 1 Co m m D e v P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 7 , 6 8 0 0 4 2 5 5 , 1 9 3 2 , 4 8 7 3 2 . 3 8 % 5 , 5 6 7 Co m m D e v C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 3 , 6 0 0 0 1 6 1 2 , 6 7 8 9 2 2 2 5 . 6 2 % 2 , 8 0 1 Co m m D e v B u s i n e s s M e a l s 1 , 1 0 0 0 6 8 1 , 3 9 3 (293)(26.60)% 1,060 Co m m D e v M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 5 3 3 6 7 6 7 . 4 8 % 1 3 Co m m D e v E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 1 , 8 2 5 0 1 , 7 7 3 8 , 3 1 9 3 , 5 0 6 2 9 . 6 4 % 5 , 2 3 5 Co m m D e v T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 7 , 0 3 5 0 4 7 3 2 , 9 1 6 4 , 1 1 9 5 8 . 5 4 % 2 , 5 3 4 Co m m D e v T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 8 , 3 0 0 0 9 2 5 6 , 7 5 5 1 , 5 4 5 1 8 . 6 1 % 2 , 5 7 0 Co m m D e v T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 3 , 1 5 0 0 4 1 9 2 , 7 5 9 3 9 1 1 2 . 4 2 % 1 , 5 5 8 Co m m D e v C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 3 Co m m D e v A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 1 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 , 6 3 4 (5,634)(40.24)% 5,851 Co m m D e v L e g a l N o t i c e s 1 0 , 4 0 0 0 1 , 0 2 0 1 1 , 2 8 1 (881)(8.47)% 13,617 Co m m D e v P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 6 , 0 0 0 0 3 , 2 8 8 6 , 7 4 2 (742)(12.37)% 6,047 Co m m D e v I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 0 0 0 5 0 (50)0.00% 0 Co m m D e v D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 4 2 , 8 5 8 0 0 1 9 , 7 9 9 2 3 , 0 5 9 5 3 . 8 0 % 3 8 , 4 2 4 Co m m D e v C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e 2 0 0 0 1 6 4 1 6 4 3 6 1 7 . 8 3 % 0 Co m m D e v H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 45 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 1 1 . 0 6 % 3 2 6 Co m m D e v M e r i d i a n D e v e l o p m e n t 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 2 5 , 0 0 0 3 3 . 3 3 % 1 6 0 Co m m D e v B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 0 0 0 (1 0 ) 10 0.00% 12 Co m m D e v E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 0 0 1 4 5 2 (52)0.00% 0 Co m m D e v G r a n t E x p e n d i t u r e s 0 0 0 1, 8 4 5 (1,845)0.00%1,266 Co m m D e v T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2 , 1 3 4 , 8 5 0 1, 4 8 5 18 7 , 0 4 5 2, 5 3 4 , 8 1 9 (3 9 8 , 4 8 5 ) (18.65)%2,152,887 Co m m D e v Co m m D e v Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Co m m D e v C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 3 1 , 6 0 2 (3 , 2 8 5 ) 0 0 28,317 100.00%0 Co m m D e v T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 31 , 6 0 2 (3 , 2 8 5 ) 0 0 28,317 100.00%0 Co m m D e v Co m m D e v DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 3, 5 5 0 , 9 2 2 (1 , 8 0 0 ) 28 6 , 7 3 5 3, 8 6 8 , 0 2 8 (3 1 8 , 9 0 6 ) (8.98)%3,425,124 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 0 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co m m D e v Co m m D e v Tr a n s f e r s Co m m D e v P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d (5 7 , 2 5 4 ) 0 (4 , 8 7 3 ) ( 5 6 , 5 1 7 ) ( 7 3 7 ) 1.28%(56,183) Co m m D e v P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 4 8 , 8 0 9 0 3 , 0 7 6 4 6 , 5 6 8 2 , 2 4 1 4 . 5 9 % 4 0 , 5 1 2 Co m m D e v O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 5 4 , 2 3 7 0 5, 1 0 4 48 , 3 5 5 5,882 10.84%54,466 Co m m D e v T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 45 , 7 9 2 0 3, 3 0 6 38 , 4 0 6 7,386 16.13%38,795 Co m m D e v Co m m D e v In t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s Co m m D e v T r a n s f e r o f E q u i t y 0 0 0 2, 2 7 5 , 0 5 4 (2 , 2 7 5 , 0 5 4 ) 0.00%3,043,921 Co m m D e v T o t a l I n t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s 0 0 0 2, 2 7 5 , 0 5 4 (2 , 2 7 5 , 0 5 4 ) 0.00%3,043,921 Co m m D e v Co m m D e v TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 3, 5 9 6 , 7 1 4 (1 , 8 0 0 ) 29 0 , 0 4 2 6, 1 8 1 , 4 8 8 (2 , 5 8 6 , 5 7 4 ) (71.95)%6,507,840 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 1 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Po l i c e 2 1 1 0 - P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t Po l i c e RE V E N U E S Po l i c e D o g L i c e n s e R e v e n u e s 4 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 4 2 9 4 9 , 7 4 1 (4,741)(10.53)% 53,978 Po l i c e F a l s e A l a r m F e e s 2 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 7 6 0 3 0 , 2 0 5 (28,205)(1,410.21)%6,220 Po l i c e G r a n t R e v e n u e s 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 3 8 8 , 2 9 5 6 4 , 6 8 9 2 9 0 , 3 9 2 1 9 7 , 9 0 3 4 0 . 5 2 % 3 0 2 , 9 4 6 Po l i c e R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 2 6 , 3 4 0 1 4 5 , 4 1 0 (1 4 5 , 4 1 0 ) 0.00% 150,753 Po l i c e C o u r t R e v e n u e 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 7 0 , 8 3 7 4 1 7 , 0 6 5 (17,065)(4.26)% 449,955 Po l i c e R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 1 7 4 1 , 8 7 2 (1,872)0.00% 1,999 Po l i c e F e d e r a l D r u g S e i z u r e R e v e n u e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 7 , 6 6 0 Po l i c e S t a t e D r u g S e i z u r e R e v e n u e 0 0 3 , 9 6 8 1 2 , 7 9 6 (12,796)0.00% 22,941 Po l i c e S c h o o l R e s o u r c e R e v e n u e 2 9 7 , 5 0 0 0 0 3 5 1 , 5 5 6 (54,056)(18.17)% 281,592 Po l i c e R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 6 9 Po l i c e R e n t a l I n c o m e 3, 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 , 6 7 5 (675)(22.50)% 3,850 Po l i c e I m p a c t R e v - M u l t i f a m i l y 0 0 6 , 5 1 5 9 2 , 0 1 8 (92,018)0.00% 24,430 Po l i c e I m p a c t R e v - C o m m e r c i a l 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 4 2 6 8 5 , 2 1 4 (65,214)(326.06)% 46,929 Po l i c e I m p a c t R e v - R e s i d e n t i a l 1 7 6 , 4 3 6 0 1 5 , 4 7 2 1 9 3 , 1 0 5 (16,669)(9.44)% 185,028 Po l i c e D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 6 , 6 8 1 5 , 9 8 4 1 2 , 6 6 5 (5,984)(89.56)% 400 Po l i c e M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 5 , 1 6 2 (5,162)0.00% 6,062 Po l i c e F i n e s , F o r f e i t R e v e n u e s 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 4 0 1 1 , 0 8 5 (6,085)(121.69)% 11,457 Po l i c e S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 4, 9 4 7 61 , 8 3 7 (61,837)0.00%51,971 Po l i c e T o t a l R E V E N U E S 1, 0 4 8 , 9 3 6 39 4 , 9 7 6 20 6 , 7 3 1 1, 7 6 3 , 7 9 8 (3 1 9 , 8 8 6 ) (22.15)%1,618,836 Po l i c e Po l i c e PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Po l i c e W a g e s 8, 8 6 3 , 6 1 8 7 9 , 9 5 4 7 5 5 , 8 6 6 8 , 3 6 9 , 6 3 9 5 7 3 , 9 3 4 6 . 4 1 % 7 , 7 6 6 , 9 9 4 Po l i c e K - 9 W a g e s 35 , 0 0 2 0 3 , 7 3 0 3 2 , 3 0 0 2 , 7 0 2 7 . 7 2 % 3 4 , 1 2 6 Po l i c e W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 1 8 , 1 0 3 0 1 , 8 6 5 1 7 , 8 2 7 2 7 6 1 . 5 2 % 1 8 , 1 4 6 Po l i c e O v e r t i m e W a g e s 5 1 1 , 3 5 0 6 3 , 8 9 1 5 7 , 5 3 2 6 3 9 , 9 8 6 (64,745)(11.25)% 551,287 Po l i c e U n i f o r m A l l o w a n c e 1 2 3 , 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 , 4 5 0 2 0 , 4 5 0 1 6 . 5 0 % 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 Po l i c e F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 7 3 0 , 7 2 5 9 , 0 0 1 6 0 , 1 7 4 6 7 5 , 1 4 9 6 4 , 5 7 7 8 . 7 2 % 6 2 3 , 5 0 3 Po l i c e P E R S I 1, 0 9 2 , 4 6 5 1 3 , 3 1 9 9 4 , 4 0 4 1 , 0 4 7 , 5 5 1 5 8 , 2 3 3 5 . 2 6 % 9 6 6 , 2 7 8 Po l i c e W o r k e r s ' C o m p 3 2 5 , 6 7 3 2 , 7 6 5 5 1 , 9 0 7 1 9 8 , 3 2 8 1 3 0 , 1 1 0 3 9 . 6 1 % 1 7 1 , 2 3 3 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 1 , 8 6 0 , 2 0 1 0 1 4 1 , 6 2 5 1 , 6 2 5 , 5 6 9 2 3 4 , 6 3 2 1 2 . 6 1 % 1 , 5 3 7 , 3 6 1 Po l i c e U n e m p l o y m e n t 0 0 18 9 18 9 (189)0.00%6,172 Po l i c e T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 3 , 5 6 1 , 0 3 7 16 8 , 9 3 0 1, 1 6 7 , 2 9 2 12 , 7 0 9 , 9 8 8 1, 0 1 9 , 9 7 9 7.43%11,780,101 Po l i c e Po l i c e OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Po l i c e O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1 0 , 4 2 1 2 4 , 0 4 9 1 , 6 7 1 2 8 , 3 6 1 6 , 1 0 9 1 7 . 7 2 % 3 3 , 0 2 3 Po l i c e C o p i e r E x p e n s e 1 8 , 3 5 2 0 1 , 7 7 4 1 8 , 0 0 0 3 5 2 1 . 9 1 % 1 5 , 2 3 0 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 8 , 5 9 0 0 1 , 0 1 4 5 , 9 7 7 2 , 6 1 3 3 0 . 4 2 % 6 , 4 7 4 Po l i c e J a n i t o r i a l 80 , 2 9 5 0 4 , 5 2 3 4 9 , 7 4 8 3 0 , 5 4 7 3 8 . 0 4 % 5 4 , 9 7 7 Po l i c e S a f e t y E x p e n s e 3 , 5 0 0 2 0 0 4 8 3 , 1 1 2 5 8 8 1 5 . 8 8 % 7 6 1 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 2 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Po l i c e S h o p S u p p l i e s 4, 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 6 3 , 1 1 4 7 7 . 8 5 % 2 , 7 0 7 Po l i c e F u e l s - G a s 26 6 , 0 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 3 2 , 5 2 9 1 6 0 , 4 0 8 1 0 9 , 5 9 2 4 0 . 5 8 % 1 4 2 , 4 7 3 Po l i c e C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 5 9 , 6 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 2 , 3 8 4 8 2 , 8 4 9 (19,249)(30.26)% 59,368 Po l i c e M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 2 , 2 5 0 0 3 0 8 4 , 1 4 5 (1,895)(84.21)% 1,930 Po l i c e D a t a A c c e s s E x p e n s e 1 , 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 5 0 Po l i c e I n v e s t i g a t i o n E x p e n s e s 1 1 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 3 1 2 9 , 2 1 4 1 , 7 8 6 1 6 . 2 3 % 6 , 2 7 8 Po l i c e K - 9 E x p e n s e s 6, 0 0 0 0 7 5 4 7 , 0 3 0 (1,030)(17.15)% 6,580 Po l i c e C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 9 , 9 0 0 1 2 , 0 7 0 8 0 1 8 , 1 2 1 3 , 8 4 9 1 7 . 5 1 % 1 6 , 0 1 2 Po l i c e B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 8 6 , 7 4 9 0 9 , 8 2 0 7 7 , 0 2 7 9 , 7 2 2 1 1 . 2 0 % 4 6 , 2 7 8 Po l i c e P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 9 9 9 1 0 . 0 0 % 7 0 Po l i c e V e h i c l e R e p a i r 6 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 5 , 2 5 8 6 5 , 7 3 2 (3,482)(5.59)% 43,340 Po l i c e V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 8 8 , 9 5 0 1 , 0 5 0 9 , 5 1 5 7 3 , 0 6 7 1 6 , 9 3 3 1 8 . 8 1 % 5 0 , 0 7 0 Po l i c e E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 5 0 0 0 0 3 4 5 1 5 5 3 1 . 0 0 % 3 1 1 Po l i c e S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 5 8 , 5 9 0 0 9 9 1 1 9 , 5 4 0 3 9 , 0 5 0 2 4 . 6 2 % 1 1 0 , 5 4 1 Po l i c e A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 3 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 8 7 4 (874)(29.13)% 5,014 Po l i c e M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 0 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 0 0 0 Po l i c e E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 5 6 , 3 4 0 8 , 6 5 0 1 1 , 1 7 3 5 2 , 8 7 2 1 2 , 1 1 8 1 8 . 6 4 % 7 7 , 9 4 6 Po l i c e A m m u n i t i o n & F i r e a r m s 8 1 , 9 9 0 5 , 2 0 0 1 9 6 8 6 , 9 0 8 2 8 2 0 . 3 2 % 7 3 , 9 4 2 Po l i c e S W A T E q u i p m e n t 6 , 0 0 0 0 3 9 0 5 , 6 7 1 3 2 9 5 . 4 9 % 6 , 3 5 8 Po l i c e E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 42 , 1 3 7 0 1 3 , 6 6 5 3 8 , 6 9 6 3 , 4 4 1 8 . 1 6 % 2 3 , 0 9 9 Po l i c e S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 5, 5 0 0 0 1 , 5 9 0 5 , 6 3 4 (134)(2.43)% 2,752 Po l i c e F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 9 , 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 7 5 7 2 4 3 2 . 2 0 % 1 0 , 1 6 4 Po l i c e C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 10 6 , 4 2 0 0 2 , 1 2 3 1 2 2 , 2 3 1 (15,811)(14.85)% 94,306 Po l i c e P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 2 3 , 5 0 2 6 7 , 2 0 0 1 1 , 0 4 3 5 9 , 1 5 8 3 1 , 5 4 4 3 4 . 7 7 % 2 7 , 1 6 9 Po l i c e C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 0 0 0 8 , 3 7 1 (8,371)0.00% 148 Po l i c e L e g a l S e r v i c e s - P r o s e c u t i o n 3 6 2 , 2 9 2 0 2 9 , 1 0 2 3 4 9 , 2 2 9 1 3 , 0 6 3 3 . 6 0 % 3 3 9 , 0 5 7 Po l i c e B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 8 , 8 0 0 0 8 6 7 1 7 , 3 1 8 (8,518)(96.79)% 6,970 Po l i c e C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 3 7 0 , 1 3 2 0 3 0 , 8 4 4 3 7 0 , 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 5 2 , 1 3 2 Po l i c e T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 1 4 , 7 0 2 0 7 1 5 8 , 5 2 1 6 , 1 8 1 4 2 . 0 4 % 9 , 1 8 4 Po l i c e P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 , 6 0 0 6 , 1 2 0 2 , 4 9 7 9 , 7 2 7 (2,007)(25.99)% 11,447 Po l i c e P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 6 , 3 9 8 1 3 , 9 0 5 1 , 6 0 0 3 7 , 1 7 0 3 , 1 3 3 7 . 7 7 % 2 9 , 7 5 0 Po l i c e I L E T S N e t w o r k 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 , 5 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 3 7 . 5 0 % 1 2 , 5 0 0 Po l i c e C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 1 5 4 6 2 , 7 6 3 1 2 , 2 3 7 1 6 . 3 1 % 5 6 , 8 2 4 Po l i c e B u s i n e s s M e a l s 2 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 8 2 , 4 8 7 4 1 3 1 4 . 2 2 % 1 , 7 0 8 Po l i c e M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 , 9 5 0 0 2 4 8 1 , 0 8 0 8 7 0 4 4 . 6 1 % 1 , 4 6 5 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 5 4 , 4 5 0 3 6 , 0 8 8 1 0 , 9 4 7 7 5 , 0 5 1 1 5 , 4 8 8 1 7 . 1 0 % 5 7 , 1 5 3 Po l i c e T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 1 , 8 0 0 0 3 , 7 7 4 2 4 , 9 1 9 (13,119)(111.17)% 18,312 Po l i c e T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 7 , 7 0 0 0 7 , 3 6 2 3 6 , 5 1 5 (18,815)(106.29)% 33,735 Po l i c e T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1 1 , 8 0 0 0 4 , 1 7 3 2 1 , 5 4 3 (9,743)(82.56)% 16,406 Po l i c e C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 3 Po l i c e A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 0 9 6 , 3 5 2 4 7 9 6 9 , 9 4 7 2 6 , 4 0 5 2 7 . 4 0 % 3 4 , 0 0 7 Po l i c e L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 9 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 3 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Po l i c e P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 7 , 5 0 0 1 0 , 2 3 3 2 , 3 8 9 1 8 , 9 1 5 (1,182)(6.66)% 8,021 Po l i c e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 1 2 3 , 2 1 6 0 5 , 6 6 4 1 2 0 , 9 1 6 2 , 3 0 0 1 . 8 6 % 1 1 6 , 2 2 0 Po l i c e E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 5 9 , 1 0 2 0 4 , 1 9 1 4 2 , 5 7 5 1 6 , 5 2 7 2 7 . 9 6 % 4 1 , 3 2 9 Po l i c e I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 2 1 , 3 3 3 0 6 3 1 1 , 0 6 0 1 0 , 2 7 3 4 8 . 1 5 % 1 0 , 6 8 0 Po l i c e S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 3 0 0 0 1 8 9 5 0 9 (209)(69.62)% 289 Po l i c e E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 6 2 5 0 0 5 1 8 1 0 7 1 7 . 1 8 % 3 0 4 Po l i c e D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 1 3 , 4 5 5 5 2 5 6 7 0 8 , 9 0 7 5 , 0 7 3 3 6 . 2 8 % 7 , 5 9 9 Po l i c e I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 1 , 7 0 0 0 0 2 , 6 0 8 (908)(53.40)% 2,549 Po l i c e H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 1 , 9 9 5 0 0 1 , 9 7 1 2 4 1 . 1 9 % 3 0 9 Po l i c e P r o p e r t y A b a t e m e n t 5 , 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 , 4 1 0 3 , 5 9 0 7 1 . 8 0 % 4 , 5 4 0 Po l i c e M o v i n g E x p e n s e s 0 0 0 2 5 0 (250)0.00% 0 Po l i c e B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 0 0 0 2 4 0 (240)0.00% 0 Po l i c e D r u g S e i z u r e E n f o r c e m n t E x p 1 8 , 0 0 0 0 1, 9 4 1 13 , 0 9 6 4,904 27.24%18,391 Po l i c e T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2 , 4 4 9 , 2 8 7 29 5 , 2 4 2 22 4 , 7 9 5 2, 4 4 5 , 6 0 9 298,920 10.89%2,110,185 Po l i c e Po l i c e Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Po l i c e B u i l d i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s 4 4 , 2 0 0 (7 , 7 7 5 ) 0 0 3 6 , 4 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 2 , 5 7 5 Po l i c e C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 8 7 9 , 3 0 0 (7 , 2 6 0 ) 0 7 9 5 , 3 2 2 7 6 , 7 1 8 8 . 7 9 % 4 2 8 , 1 4 8 Po l i c e C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 1 0 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 9 , 6 5 0 (9,150)(87.14)% 38,891 Po l i c e C a p i t a l - K - 9 & E q u i p m e n t 1 6 , 0 0 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 2 4 , 5 0 0 (8,500)(53.12)% 7,500 Po l i c e P u b l i c S a f e t y T r a i n i n g C t r 1 0 1 , 1 1 3 (2 0 , 8 2 5 ) 0 0 80,287 100.00%49,173 Po l i c e T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 1 , 0 5 1 , 1 1 3 (3 5 , 8 6 0 ) 8, 0 0 0 83 9 , 4 7 2 175,780 17.31%546,287 Po l i c e Po l i c e DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 17 , 0 6 1 , 4 3 7 42 8 , 3 1 2 1, 4 0 0 , 0 8 7 15 , 9 9 5 , 0 6 9 1, 4 9 4 , 6 8 0 8.54%14,436,572 Po l i c e Po l i c e TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 17 , 0 6 1 , 4 3 7 42 8 , 3 1 2 1, 4 0 0 , 0 8 7 15 , 9 9 5 , 0 6 9 1, 4 9 4 , 6 8 0 8.54%14,436,572 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 4 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi r e 2 2 1 0 - F i r e D e p a r t m e n t Fi r e RE V E N U E S Fi r e F i r e I n s p e c t i o n & P e r m i t F e e s 0 0 6 9 6 1 3 , 4 8 9 (13,489)0.00% 14,871 Fi r e G r a n t R e v e n u e s 0 2 , 9 0 0 0 2 , 9 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 5 0 0 Fi r e R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 1 2 , 2 9 8 4 4 , 4 2 3 (44,423)0.00% 15,839 Fi r e R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 7 Fi r e R u r a l F i r e & M i s c R e v e n u e 1 , 1 6 0 , 1 1 0 2 2 9 , 0 9 2 1 0 6 , 0 4 6 1 , 0 2 4 , 0 1 6 3 6 5 , 1 8 6 2 6 . 2 8 % 1 , 3 8 7 , 9 5 7 Fi r e I m p a c t R e v - M u l t i f a m i l y 0 0 2 6 , 4 5 1 3 7 3 , 6 2 5 (3 7 3 , 6 2 5 ) 0.00% 99,193 Fi r e I m p a c t R e v - C o m m e r c i a l 6 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 4 9 3 5 3 , 0 2 8 (2 9 3 , 0 2 8 ) (488.38)% 194,428 Fi r e I m p a c t R e v - R e s i d e n t i a l 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 6 2 , 8 2 2 7 8 4 , 1 7 3 (2 8 4 , 1 7 3 ) (56.83)% 751,080 Fi r e D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 8 , 4 3 0 0 8 , 4 6 5 (35)(0.41)% 8,837 Fi r e M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 7 6 1 (761)0.00% 1,815 Fi r e S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 0 29 , 9 9 7 (29,997)0.00%18,540 Fi r e T o t a l R E V E N U E S 1, 7 2 0 , 1 1 0 24 0 , 4 2 2 21 8 , 3 6 2 2, 6 3 4 , 8 7 6 (6 7 4 , 3 4 4 ) (34.40)%2,495,075 Fi r e Fi r e PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Fi r e W a g e s 5, 9 4 5 , 5 5 8 8 5 , 9 1 2 5 3 3 , 2 2 7 5 , 7 6 8 , 7 6 4 2 6 2 , 7 0 6 4 . 3 5 % 5 , 3 2 7 , 2 1 1 Fi r e W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 1 5 , 8 0 0 0 1 , 3 5 6 1 6 , 0 9 0 (290)(1.83)% 6,605 Fi r e O v e r t i m e W a g e s 3 3 9 , 8 0 4 7 1 , 4 2 8 5 9 , 3 2 1 5 9 7 , 3 9 4 (1 8 6 , 1 6 2 ) (45.26)% 587,268 Fi r e F i r e f i g h t e r s F L S A W a g e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 , 8 5 3 Fi r e F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 4 8 2 , 0 3 8 1 2 , 0 3 6 4 3 , 5 5 0 4 6 8 , 3 6 3 2 5 , 7 1 1 5 . 2 0 % 4 3 6 , 1 4 2 Fi r e P E R S I 73 1 , 6 6 1 1 8 , 3 4 6 6 9 , 0 4 1 7 4 0 , 3 3 6 9 , 6 7 1 1 . 2 8 % 6 8 7 , 2 1 4 Fi r e W o r k e r s ' C o m p 2 7 2 , 3 8 1 6 , 9 7 0 4 8 , 9 9 7 1 8 3 , 6 9 2 9 5 , 6 5 9 3 4 . 2 4 % 1 5 7 , 6 8 7 Fi r e E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 1 , 0 7 9 , 2 0 0 2 8 , 4 0 0 9 6 , 7 8 6 1 , 0 4 4 , 3 9 9 6 3 , 2 0 1 5 . 7 0 % 9 9 4 , 5 9 0 Fi r e U n e m p l o y m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0 Fi r e T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 8 , 8 6 6 , 4 4 2 22 3 , 0 9 2 85 2 , 2 7 8 8, 8 1 9 , 0 3 8 270,496 2.98%8,204,570 Fi r e Fi r e OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Fi r e O f f i c e E x p e n s e 7 , 9 5 0 0 1 , 6 8 5 7 , 8 8 5 6 5 0 . 8 1 % 7 , 2 3 5 Fi r e C o p i e r E x p e n s e 7 , 3 5 1 0 1 , 1 5 3 7 , 9 0 6 (555)(7.54)% 7,884 Fi r e E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 4 , 9 2 0 0 7 6 0 4 , 4 6 9 4 5 1 9 . 1 6 % 4 , 5 5 7 Fi r e J a n i t o r i a l 12 , 0 3 0 0 7 9 6 8 , 5 7 6 3 , 4 5 4 2 8 . 7 1 % 1 0 , 3 2 3 Fi r e S a f e t y E x p e n s e 20 0 0 1 4 9 2 7 4 (73)(36.73)% 157 Fi r e S h o p S u p p l i e s 5, 2 0 0 0 1 , 0 7 0 4 , 9 8 3 2 1 7 4 . 1 6 % 4 , 8 3 7 Fi r e D i s p a t c h S e r v i c e 9 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 , 6 6 9 9 , 3 3 1 9 . 7 1 % 8 2 , 5 5 7 Fi r e F u e l s - G a s 95 , 6 5 0 0 1 2 , 3 6 7 6 3 , 1 8 6 3 2 , 4 6 4 3 3 . 9 4 % 5 4 , 4 9 0 Fi r e F u e l s - D i e s e l / P r o p a n e 2 , 2 5 0 0 0 8 7 9 1 , 3 7 1 6 0 . 9 4 % 0 Fi r e C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 6 3 , 5 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 1 1 , 4 6 6 7 0 , 5 6 1 (1,061)(1.52)% 50,229 Fi r e S C B A / B o t t l e s / C o T e s t e r 2 0 , 6 0 0 0 1 3 , 4 6 6 1 8 , 2 7 4 2 , 3 2 6 1 1 . 2 9 % 6 , 8 8 4 Fi r e M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 6 2 6 1 4 , 6 6 0 3 4 0 2 . 2 6 % 1 8 , 1 2 1 Fi r e J P A M e d i c a l S v c & S u p p l i e s 3 1 , 2 5 0 0 0 2 3 , 8 5 5 7 , 3 9 5 2 3 . 6 6 % 0 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 5 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi r e C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 1 , 5 0 0 0 8 5 0 1 , 9 3 4 (434)(28.92)% 500 Fi r e B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 8 8 , 7 8 6 6 9 , 4 3 2 5 0 , 8 1 7 1 3 5 , 1 3 0 2 3 , 0 8 8 1 4 . 5 9 % 5 7 , 4 7 4 Fi r e P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 4 4 , 0 2 0 (2 9 , 5 2 0 ) 10 , 0 5 1 1 0 , 6 9 1 3 , 8 0 9 2 6 . 2 6 % 1 7 , 6 7 3 Fi r e V e h i c l e R e p a i r 5 8 , 3 0 0 0 1 2 , 2 1 9 8 0 , 7 2 5 (22,425)(38.46)% 74,634 Fi r e V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 6 7 , 9 8 0 0 1 1 , 4 3 9 6 2 , 3 8 8 5 , 5 9 2 8 . 2 2 % 6 6 , 4 7 5 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 2 8 , 1 7 5 0 1 , 4 8 1 1 8 , 0 0 3 1 0 , 1 7 2 3 6 . 1 0 % 1 1 , 3 3 2 Fi r e G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 6 2 5 0 0 1 , 8 5 0 (1,225)(196.01)% 339 Fi r e S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 2 , 6 8 0 4 0 , 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 8 , 7 2 3 6 3 , 9 5 7 6 9 . 0 0 % 1 9 , 6 1 6 Fi r e A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 7 , 8 8 2 0 1 2 9 8 , 6 3 1 (749)(9.50)% 7,221 Fi r e F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 1 , 0 5 0 0 0 1 , 5 6 9 (519)(49.39)% 1,107 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 9 3 , 3 5 0 0 1 9 , 7 4 9 6 7 , 6 4 2 2 5 , 7 0 8 2 7 . 5 3 % 9 1 , 6 3 2 Fi r e T u r n o u t E q u i p m e n t 9 3 , 5 4 9 0 1 , 8 8 1 9 9 , 9 4 0 (6,391)(6.83)% 60,069 Fi r e E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 12 , 1 5 0 0 3 , 6 3 4 8 , 3 9 6 3 , 7 5 5 3 0 . 9 0 % 9 , 1 4 0 Fi r e S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 6 7 8 (678)0.00% 1,315 Fi r e F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 1 , 8 9 0 0 1 , 8 9 0 1 1 , 9 1 8 (29)(0.24)% 25,458 Fi r e C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 17 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 , 6 7 4 3 2 6 1 . 9 1 % 1 8 , 9 9 6 Fi r e P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 1 0 , 0 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 , 0 0 0 Fi r e C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 2 1 7 Fi r e P r e v e n t a t i v e H e a l t h E x p 3 5 , 1 1 0 0 6 , 5 9 0 2 8 , 8 7 1 6 , 2 3 9 1 7 . 7 7 % 2 5 , 3 9 8 Fi r e B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 7 , 8 0 0 0 9 , 7 8 0 1 3 , 6 9 4 (5,894)(75.56)% 9,341 Fi r e T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 7 , 5 6 8 0 4 4 6 4 , 9 9 7 2 , 5 7 1 3 3 . 9 7 % 4 , 8 1 8 Fi r e P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 , 7 0 0 0 3 3 1 , 6 7 6 2 4 1 . 4 1 % 1 , 4 3 3 Fi r e P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 3 3 , 4 7 0 (1 6 , 0 0 0 ) 4, 2 5 7 1 6 , 9 4 6 5 2 4 2 . 9 9 % 5 , 9 1 9 Fi r e C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 9 , 7 6 3 0 1 , 0 8 1 9 , 4 0 8 3 5 5 3 . 6 4 % 8 , 1 3 3 Fi r e B u s i n e s s M e a l s 1 , 9 0 0 0 5 7 6 2 , 1 3 6 (236)(12.42)% 1,210 Fi r e M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 8 9 . 9 9 % 4 Fi r e E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 3 6 , 0 9 2 2 , 9 0 0 4 , 8 4 0 5 0 , 2 5 2 (11,260)(28.87)% 23,552 Fi r e T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 2 0 , 2 6 4 0 1 , 0 5 4 1 4 , 1 7 1 6 , 0 9 3 3 0 . 0 6 % 9 , 5 0 5 Fi r e T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 2 8 , 4 7 8 0 2 , 9 8 3 2 5 , 4 4 0 3 , 0 3 8 1 0 . 6 6 % 1 8 , 2 1 7 Fi r e T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1 7 , 5 6 6 0 2 , 4 5 3 1 4 , 6 5 8 2 , 9 0 8 1 6 . 5 5 % 1 1 , 8 2 6 Fi r e C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 6 , 9 6 9 0 1 6 5 2 , 4 2 2 4 , 5 4 7 6 5 . 2 5 % 4 , 6 9 8 Fi r e A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 7 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 9 3 0 1 0 , 0 8 2 1 6 , 4 8 9 1 , 4 4 1 8 . 0 3 % 1 4 , 7 7 1 Fi r e L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 2 1 9 (219)0.00% 0 Fi r e P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 3 , 0 6 0 0 1 , 7 1 7 3 , 0 2 9 3 1 1 . 0 1 % 1 , 3 4 3 Fi r e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 8 6 , 5 8 4 0 0 7 6 , 1 8 4 1 0 , 4 0 0 1 2 . 0 1 % 7 4 , 6 9 0 Fi r e E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 3 3 , 5 0 0 0 2 , 8 5 9 2 8 , 7 6 7 4 , 7 3 3 1 4 . 1 2 % 2 6 , 4 4 9 Fi r e I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 2 2 , 7 0 0 0 1 6 6 1 5 , 8 3 9 6 , 8 6 1 3 0 . 2 2 % 1 4 , 9 0 9 Fi r e S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 8 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 4 0 0 0 0 2 , 6 1 2 (2,212)(552.99)% 133 Fi r e B l d g & S t r u c t u r e s R e n t a l & L e a s e 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 (300)0.00% 0 Fi r e D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 2 9 , 8 2 7 0 6 , 1 8 9 2 7 , 6 5 8 2 , 1 6 9 7 . 2 7 % 2 4 , 1 3 3 Fi r e I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 1 , 3 0 0 0 0 8 7 1 4 3 0 3 3 . 0 3 % 9 2 2 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 6 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi r e H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 1 , 2 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 1 2 5 Fi r e B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0 Fi r e T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1 , 3 4 3 , 1 9 0 13 3 , 7 4 2 21 4 , 9 4 9 1, 2 2 4 , 9 1 5 252,017 17.06%1,025,078 Fi r e Fi r e Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Fi r e C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 0 3 , 9 7 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 3 , 9 7 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 1 1 8 , 5 2 0 0 0 1 2 2 , 1 8 4 (3,664)(3.09)% 67,594 Fi r e C a p i t a l - F i r e T r u c k s 1 , 0 5 3 , 8 2 9 (3 0 9 , 3 2 9 ) 0 0 7 4 4 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 5 6 3 , 9 7 6 Fi r e C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 4 0 , 0 0 0 (4 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 1 3 1 , 0 0 0 0 4 9 , 4 3 8 1 2 0 , 9 0 5 1 0 , 0 9 5 7 . 7 0 % 3 , 2 0 0 Fi r e C a p i t a l - C o m m u n i c a t i o n E q u i p m e n t 0 16 , 0 0 0 0 14 , 1 9 7 1,803 11.27%0 Fi r e T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 1 , 3 4 3 , 3 4 9 3, 6 3 8 , 1 7 1 49 , 4 3 8 25 7 , 2 8 6 4, 7 2 4 , 2 3 4 94.84%1,634,769 Fi r e Fi r e DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 11 , 5 5 2 , 9 8 1 3, 9 9 5 , 0 0 5 1, 1 1 6 , 6 6 4 10 , 3 0 1 , 2 3 9 5, 2 4 6 , 7 4 6 33.74%10,864,417 Fi r e Fi r e Tr a n s f e r s Fi r e P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 2 0 , 2 5 0 0 7 3 7 1 9 , 2 1 6 1 , 0 3 4 5 . 1 0 % 1 9 , 0 5 9 Fi r e O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 5 4 , 5 7 3 0 5, 1 3 5 48 , 6 5 4 5,919 10.84%54,803 Fi r e T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 74 , 8 2 3 0 5, 8 7 3 67 , 8 7 1 6,952 9.29%73,862 Fi r e Fi r e In t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s Fi r e O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r I n 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%(353,986) Fi r e T o t a l I n t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%(353,986) Fi r e Fi r e TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 11 , 6 2 7 , 8 0 4 3, 9 9 5 , 0 0 5 1, 1 2 2 , 5 3 6 10 , 3 6 9 , 1 1 0 5, 2 5 3 , 6 9 9 33.62%10,584,293 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 7 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s 2 2 5 0 - P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n Pa r k s RE V E N U E S Pa r k s G r a n t R e v e n u e - C a p i t a l 0 7 5 , 3 9 5 0 6 5 , 8 3 5 9 , 5 6 0 1 2 . 6 8 % 4 , 6 0 5 Pa r k s R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 9 , 9 0 0 3 3 , 9 1 4 (3,914)(13.04)% 43,616 Pa r k s R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 0 5 9 (59)0.00% 139 Pa r k s M e r i d i a n D o w n t o w n D e v e l o p m e n t 0 0 2 5 , 0 0 0 2 5 , 0 0 0 (25,000)0.00% 25,000 Pa r k s R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 6 2 Pa r k s R e n t a l I n c o m e 1 0 4 , 0 0 0 0 2 2 , 3 7 4 1 3 0 , 3 0 7 (26,307)(25.29)% 19,550 Pa r k s P a r k R e s e r v a t i o n s F e e R e v e n u e 1 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 6 , 9 7 5 1 5 6 , 6 5 6 (46,656)(42.41)% 145,062 Pa r k s R e c r e a t i o n C l a s s R e v e n u e s 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 8 , 5 9 3 2 3 0 , 3 5 9 (30,359)(15.17)% 230,513 Pa r k s C o m m u n i t y E v e n t R e v / S p o n s o r s h i p 3 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 5 3 , 8 8 6 (13,886)(34.71)% 42,542 Pa r k s S p o r t s R e v e n u e 2 1 6 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 2 4 3 3 7 , 7 6 9 (1 2 1 , 7 6 9 ) (56.37)% 246,979 Pa r k s I m p a c t R e v - M u l t i f a m i l y 0 0 3 6 , 8 4 1 5 2 0 , 3 7 9 (5 2 0 , 3 7 9 ) 0.00% 138,154 Pa r k s I m p a c t R e v - R e s i d e n t i a l 1 , 0 3 8 , 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 , 2 0 2 1 , 5 3 7 , 8 6 5 (4 9 9 , 8 6 5 ) (48.15)% 1,471,941 Pa r k s C o n t r a c t S e r v i c e R e v e n u e s 8 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 4 0 1 1 0 , 5 5 1 (2,551)(31.88)% 8,171 Pa r k s D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 (1,000)0.00% 3,169 Pa r k s C a s h D o n a t i o n f o r C a p i t a l O u t l a y 0 4 2 5 , 0 0 0 0 2 3 , 3 8 8 4 0 1 , 6 1 3 9 4 . 4 9 % 0 Pa r k s M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 1 (1,001)0.00% 327 Pa r k s I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 8 , 1 9 0 1 4 0 , 9 7 5 (1 2 5 , 9 7 5 ) (839.83)% 87,023 Pa r k s S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 0 3 , 0 5 1 (3,051)0.00% 26,580 Pa r k s U n r e a l i z e d G a i n o n I n v e s t m e n t s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%(562) Pa r k s T o t a l R E V E N U E S 1, 7 5 1 , 0 0 0 51 0 , 3 9 5 26 3 , 0 0 1 3, 2 7 1 , 9 9 3 (1 , 0 1 0 , 5 9 8 ) (44.69)%2,493,270 Pa r k s Pa r k s PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Pa r k s W a g e s 1, 3 5 1 , 4 1 5 (4 , 4 5 2 ) 10 6 , 5 7 6 1 , 2 6 1 , 9 1 4 8 5 , 0 4 9 6 . 3 1 % 1 , 0 9 2 , 6 9 2 Pa r k s W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 4 4 9 , 6 5 6 0 3 9 , 4 0 8 3 7 9 , 0 2 2 7 0 , 6 3 3 1 5 . 7 0 % 3 5 9 , 3 4 3 Pa r k s O v e r t i m e W a g e s 2 0 , 2 4 5 0 3 , 7 6 4 5 8 , 7 0 4 (38,459)(189.96)% 30,001 Pa r k s U n i f o r m A l l o w a n c e 4 4 5 (4 4 5 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 1 3 0 , 2 9 2 0 1 1 , 0 1 7 1 2 4 , 6 7 5 5 , 6 1 7 4 . 3 1 % 1 0 8 , 6 5 8 Pa r k s P E R S I 14 5 , 0 6 0 0 1 2 , 5 3 1 1 4 7 , 3 3 4 (2,274)(1.56)% 128,643 Pa r k s W o r k e r s ' C o m p 5 3 , 5 2 1 0 1 2 , 7 0 9 3 9 , 0 2 4 1 4 , 4 9 7 2 7 . 0 8 % 3 2 , 6 3 3 Pa r k s E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 5 6 9 , 9 0 8 0 3 4 , 0 1 2 4 0 5 , 0 6 7 1 6 4 , 8 4 1 2 8 . 9 2 % 3 7 6 , 1 2 5 Pa r k s U n e m p l o y m e n t 0 0 (1 2 2 ) 22 , 0 7 5 (22,075)0.00%8,600 Pa r k s T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 2 , 7 2 0 , 5 4 2 (4 , 8 9 7 ) 21 9 , 8 9 5 2, 4 3 7 , 8 1 5 277,829 10.23%2,136,695 Pa r k s Pa r k s OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Pa r k s O f f i c e E x p e n s e 5 , 4 4 6 0 3 6 2 4 , 7 5 7 6 8 9 1 2 . 6 5 % 5 , 3 6 2 Pa r k s C o p i e r E x p e n s e 1 1 , 9 5 2 0 6 2 9 6 , 8 4 2 5 , 1 1 0 4 2 . 7 5 % 7 , 3 3 1 Pa r k s S p r a y i n g / F e r t i l i z e r 7 1 , 7 6 6 0 2 1 , 5 5 9 6 4 , 7 3 0 7 , 0 3 6 9 . 8 0 % 6 9 , 8 6 6 Pa r k s E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 3 , 6 2 2 6 0 1 , 0 6 0 2 , 3 2 0 1 , 3 6 2 3 6 . 9 8 % 2 , 3 0 1 Pa r k s J a n i t o r i a l 47 , 1 6 4 (9 , 0 0 0 ) 2, 9 2 5 3 3 , 6 3 0 4 , 5 3 4 1 1 . 8 8 % 9 , 5 1 3 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 8 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s R e s t r o o m S u p p l i e s 2 2 , 5 2 7 0 0 2 8 , 3 3 3 (5,806)(25.77)% 21,882 Pa r k s S a f e t y E x p e n s e 2 , 8 4 5 0 0 3 , 0 5 7 (212)(7.44)% 2,738 Pa r k s S h o p S u p p l i e s 7, 9 1 2 0 1 1 1 5 , 6 0 3 2 , 3 0 9 2 9 . 1 7 % 6 , 8 6 5 Pa r k s F u e l s - G a s 64 , 1 2 3 0 7 , 8 0 3 4 9 , 2 0 0 1 4 , 9 2 3 2 3 . 2 7 % 4 1 , 7 2 2 Pa r k s C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 6 , 7 2 0 4 4 5 6 9 8 7 , 6 1 2 (447)(6.23)% 6,846 Pa r k s M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 1 , 4 3 5 0 0 1 5 2 1 , 2 8 3 8 9 . 3 7 % 3 1 9 Pa r k s R e c r e a t i o n C l a s s E x p e n s e 1 6 , 6 0 0 0 3 , 1 3 0 1 7 , 7 5 8 (1,158)(6.97)% 14,125 Pa r k s R e c r e a t i o n S p o r t s E x p e n s e s 1 2 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 7 , 3 0 0 1 3 7 , 4 8 9 (12,489)(9.99)% 128,549 Pa r k s C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 4 2 , 0 0 0 0 1 8 , 6 9 1 3 4 , 5 8 3 7 , 4 1 7 1 7 . 6 5 % 3 7 , 4 9 9 Pa r k s B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 9 1 , 7 9 1 0 1 4 , 8 3 8 8 1 , 2 2 5 1 0 , 5 6 5 1 1 . 5 1 % 4 5 , 9 4 1 Pa r k s P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 3 4 , 5 5 6 0 1 1 , 0 1 9 3 1 , 1 0 1 3 , 4 5 5 9 . 9 9 % 2 1 , 9 0 3 Pa r k s V e h i c l e R e p a i r 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 1 5 1 3 , 0 8 7 1 , 9 1 3 1 2 . 7 5 % 1 7 , 1 2 6 Pa r k s V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 3 2 4 5 , 3 7 3 9 , 6 2 7 6 4 . 1 8 % 9 , 4 1 5 Pa r k s E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 3 3 , 6 0 1 0 3 , 4 7 6 4 4 , 1 6 0 (10,559)(31.42)% 33,203 Pa r k s F o r e s t r y E x p e n s e 4 4 , 5 3 6 0 1 3 , 5 0 4 4 4 , 1 5 2 3 8 4 0 . 8 6 % 3 7 , 8 9 6 Pa r k s D o w n t o w n T r e e M a i n t e n a n c e 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 2 5 , 3 7 7 7 2 , 9 9 2 2 , 0 0 8 2 . 6 7 % 7 3 , 0 0 9 Pa r k s G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 1 6 7 , 8 6 1 3 2 , 6 7 0 1 0 , 1 3 1 1 6 6 , 8 0 0 3 3 , 7 3 1 1 6 . 8 2 % 1 7 3 , 2 8 8 Pa r k s V a n d a l i s m C l e a n u p E x p 2 , 0 6 3 0 1 0 3 1 , 1 0 5 9 5 8 4 6 . 4 2 % 6 , 9 4 7 Pa r k s T u r f R e h a b 15 , 6 9 9 0 7 6 0 9 , 1 9 9 6 , 5 0 0 4 1 . 4 0 % 9 , 1 6 6 Pa r k s S u r f a c e W e l l M a i n t 1 3 , 8 2 6 0 0 1 0 , 6 4 4 3 , 1 8 2 2 3 . 0 1 % 1 5 , 0 4 5 Pa r k s S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 3 , 7 5 3 0 0 1 , 9 7 1 1 , 7 8 2 4 7 . 4 8 % 1 , 7 5 5 Pa r k s A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 1 , 0 0 0 0 3 6 1 2 , 6 2 2 (1,622)(162.18)% 0 Pa r k s M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 3 , 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 2 5 3 7 4 7 2 4 . 9 0 % 2 , 6 3 1 Pa r k s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S e r v i c e s 9 , 0 0 0 0 0 9 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 9 , 2 5 7 0 6 , 6 5 1 9 , 0 0 7 2 5 0 2 . 7 0 % 6 , 3 0 8 Pa r k s E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 4 3 , 7 8 3 (7 , 0 0 0 ) 3, 1 9 4 4 2 , 1 9 2 (5,409)(14.70)% 37,612 Pa r k s E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 12 , 9 0 8 0 3 3 1 2 , 6 8 9 2 1 9 1 . 6 9 % 1 4 , 7 1 7 Pa r k s S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 12 , 9 4 6 0 0 7 8 7 1 2 , 1 6 0 9 3 . 9 2 % 0 Pa r k s F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 3 , 0 8 2 0 1 5 1 , 5 1 4 1 , 5 6 8 5 0 . 8 6 % 1 2 , 0 3 4 Pa r k s C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 5, 8 0 0 1 , 9 5 0 0 6 , 2 2 2 1 , 5 2 8 1 9 . 7 2 % 9 , 4 5 0 Pa r k s P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 5 8 , 3 4 2 (1 , 0 7 7 ) 6, 3 8 0 3 2 , 4 2 4 2 4 , 8 4 1 4 3 . 3 7 % 4 1 , 9 2 2 Pa r k s I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 0 0 1 9 0 2 , 2 6 7 (2,267)0.00% 2,256 Pa r k s C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 2 9 7 , 9 6 3 0 2 8 , 6 8 5 2 8 5 , 0 7 4 1 2 , 8 8 9 4 . 3 2 % 2 9 0 , 8 7 4 Pa r k s B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 2 , 1 0 0 0 3 1 5 1 , 1 4 7 9 5 3 4 5 . 3 8 % 1 , 2 0 3 Pa r k s C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 0 0 2 , 1 3 0 1 0 , 7 2 5 (10,725)0.00% 0 Pa r k s T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 8 , 4 6 5 (5 , 0 4 7 ) 96 3 , 5 7 9 (161)(4.70)% 5,668 Pa r k s P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 , 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 , 0 4 5 (45)(4.51)% 805 Pa r k s P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 1 , 2 7 8 9 7 5 1 8 1 1 , 9 4 6 3 0 8 1 3 . 6 4 % 6 7 3 Pa r k s C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 9 , 7 7 8 4 , 9 9 2 1 , 2 5 6 2 0 , 6 7 2 4 , 0 9 8 1 6 . 5 4 % 1 3 , 2 4 3 Pa r k s B u s i n e s s M e a l s 30 0 0 1 5 4 1 7 (117)(38.91)% 0 Pa r k s M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 0 0 0 1 4 5 (145)0.00% 87 Pa r k s E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 6 , 1 2 0 2 0 6 1 , 4 6 0 1 0 , 0 1 9 6 , 3 0 7 3 8 . 6 3 % 5 , 8 6 2 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 4 9 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 6 , 0 9 9 2 5 8 5 4 4 3 , 4 1 4 2 , 9 4 3 4 6 . 2 8 % 8 0 0 Pa r k s T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 9 , 3 6 9 6 7 0 9 0 6 4 , 6 6 9 5 , 3 6 9 5 3 . 4 8 % 1 , 9 5 2 Pa r k s T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 4 , 5 3 6 3 6 3 5 1 2 2 , 8 4 5 2 , 0 5 5 4 1 . 9 3 % 8 5 4 Pa r k s C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 3 Pa r k s A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 9 , 0 0 0 0 0 4 , 6 1 7 4 , 3 8 3 4 8 . 7 0 % 1 , 6 1 4 Pa r k s L e g a l N o t i c e s 50 0 0 0 7 2 2 (222)(44.42)% 567 Pa r k s P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 2 7 , 1 5 0 9 1 5 2 , 4 4 4 2 1 , 2 4 0 6 , 8 2 5 2 4 . 3 1 % 1 9 , 8 0 7 Pa r k s I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 1 8 , 3 1 6 0 0 2 1 , 1 1 6 (2,800)(15.28)% 18,300 Pa r k s E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 1 5 1 , 9 2 6 0 1 2 , 3 8 7 1 4 2 , 6 0 3 9 , 3 2 3 6 . 1 3 % 1 1 1 , 2 2 2 Pa r k s I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 2 3 , 7 8 7 0 1 0 4 1 1 , 3 4 8 1 2 , 4 3 9 5 2 . 2 9 % 6 , 3 2 3 Pa r k s E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 4 0 , 6 1 3 0 2 , 1 2 3 5 3 , 2 1 8 (12,605)(31.03)% 40,111 Pa r k s D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 9 , 6 8 1 0 1 0 0 7 , 4 3 8 2 , 2 4 3 2 3 . 1 7 % 7 , 6 8 5 Pa r k s C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e 1 , 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 2 % 4 4 4 Pa r k s I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 4 1 , 1 0 0 0 0 4 4 , 6 6 0 (3,560)(8.66)% 43,336 Pa r k s H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 3 5 , 4 8 0 1 5 6 , 0 0 0 3 9 , 9 1 3 (4,418)(12.44)% 31,811 Pa r k s V o l u n t e e r A p p r e c i a t i o n e x p e n s e 2 , 5 0 0 0 5 9 3 1 , 5 7 2 9 2 8 3 7 . 1 2 % 0 Pa r k s B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 2 7 , 0 0 0 0 3, 0 4 5 30 , 9 6 2 (3,962)(14.67)%29,645 Pa r k s T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1 , 8 5 5 , 9 7 7 21 , 3 9 5 23 8 , 9 4 0 1, 7 2 4 , 9 5 5 152,416 8.12%1,559,579 Pa r k s Pa r k s Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Pa r k s C a p i t a l O u t l a y - L a n d 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 2 5 , 7 3 3 Pa r k s C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 4 , 0 0 4 , 9 0 0 (3 , 3 7 0 , 7 1 9 ) 0 0 6 3 4 , 1 8 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 , 3 7 0 , 7 1 9 Pa r k s B u i l d i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 0 7 , 6 9 8 6 0 , 0 0 8 4 4 , 9 9 2 4 2 . 8 4 % 0 Pa r k s P a t h w a y d e v e l o p m e n t 5 6 9 , 5 7 7 (2 6 , 1 9 1 ) 8, 1 7 8 9 4 , 7 3 0 4 4 8 , 6 5 6 8 2 . 5 6 % 5 8 , 1 9 8 Pa r k s I m p r o v e m e n t s @ T u l l y P a r k 2 1 , 0 3 9 1 2 , 9 6 1 0 3 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s I m p r o v e m e n t s @ S t o r e y P a r k 1 3 0 , 8 6 1 7 4 , 6 6 5 1 , 0 8 8 6 9 , 2 2 6 1 3 6 , 3 0 0 6 6 . 3 1 % 1 9 , 2 8 7 Pa r k s S t r e e t s c a p e i r r i g a t i o n l a n d s c a p i n g 14 6 , 7 4 8 (1 , 3 3 5 ) 2, 2 8 5 7 2 , 0 7 6 7 3 , 3 3 7 5 0 . 4 3 % 3 3 1 , 2 8 7 Pa r k s B o r u p P r o p e r t y c o n s t r u c t i o n 7 1 , 8 5 9 0 0 1 6 0 7 1 , 6 9 9 9 9 . 7 7 % 3 , 1 4 1 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 5 8 , 5 0 0 0 2 , 9 8 3 5 6 , 1 1 9 2 , 3 8 1 4 . 0 6 % 0 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 9 2 , 5 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 5 , 1 6 8 9 7 , 1 5 4 5 , 3 4 6 5 . 2 1 % 2 6 1 , 9 9 4 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - L a w n m o w e r 3 8 , 6 9 8 (1 9 , 6 9 8 ) 0 1 6 , 8 8 6 2 , 1 1 4 1 1 . 1 2 % 9 8 , 3 0 2 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - C o m m u n i c a t i o n E q u i p m e n t 50 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s A d v e n t u r e I s l a n d E q u i p m e n t @ 5 6 a c r e s 14 , 0 4 8 0 0 0 1 4 , 0 4 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 8 3 , 9 1 4 Pa r k s B e a r C r e e k D e v e l o p m e n t 3 2 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s K e i t h B i r d L e g a c y P a r k c o n s t r u c t i o n 63 7 , 2 9 5 9 6 3 , 4 9 8 2 5 1 , 1 6 8 1 , 0 2 8 , 5 4 9 5 7 2 , 2 4 4 3 5 . 7 4 % 6 2 , 3 6 1 Pa r k s K l e i n e r M e m o r i a l P a r k 3 6 , 2 1 9 (1 , 6 7 9 ) 0 1 5 , 4 2 9 1 9 , 1 1 1 5 5 . 3 2 % 3 , 2 3 8 Pa r k s 7 7 a c r e S o u t h P a r k 7 3 5 , 2 2 2 (3 8 , 5 9 2 ) 19 3 , 9 0 9 3 8 8 , 1 0 3 3 0 8 , 5 2 7 4 4 . 2 8 % 5 3 , 3 7 1 Pa r k s R e t a H u s k e y P a r k 1 , 4 6 1 , 0 1 0 8 8 , 4 3 9 3 1 2 , 1 8 8 1 , 3 4 4 , 5 3 2 2 0 4 , 9 1 8 1 3 . 2 2 % 2 2 , 6 7 1 Pa r k s H i l l s d a l e P a r k C o n s t r u c t i o n 1 , 4 5 9 , 9 2 4 27 0 , 3 3 7 73 , 5 7 0 1, 1 8 1 , 5 7 9 548,682 31.71%12,170 Pa r k s T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 9 , 6 6 5 , 4 0 1 (2 , 0 3 8 , 3 1 4 ) 85 8 , 2 3 5 4, 4 5 8 , 5 5 1 3, 1 6 8 , 5 3 5 41.54%5,006,385 Pa r k s Pa r k s DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 14 , 2 4 1 , 9 1 9 (2 , 0 2 1 , 8 1 6 ) 1, 3 1 7 , 0 7 0 8, 6 2 1 , 3 2 2 3, 5 9 8 , 7 8 1 29.44%8,702,658 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 0 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s Pa r k s Tr a n s f e r s Pa r k s P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 1 3 , 1 1 5 0 4 7 8 1 2 , 4 4 6 6 6 9 5 . 0 9 % 1 2 , 3 4 5 Pa r k s O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 3 5 , 3 4 6 0 3, 3 2 6 31 , 5 1 3 3,833 10.84%35,495 Pa r k s T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 48 , 4 6 1 0 3, 8 0 4 43 , 9 5 9 4,502 9.29%47,840 Pa r k s Pa r k s TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 14 , 2 9 0 , 3 8 0 (2 , 0 2 1 , 8 1 6 ) 1, 3 2 0 , 8 7 4 8, 6 6 5 , 2 8 1 3, 6 0 3 , 2 8 3 29.37%8,750,498 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 1 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual PW 3 2 0 0 - P u b l i c W o r k s PW RE V E N U E S PW R e v i e w F e e s 15 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 4 , 6 9 0 4 6 6 , 2 8 0 (3 1 6 , 2 8 0 ) (210.85)% 496,490 PW Q L P E R e v i e w R e v e n u e 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 4 , 6 8 0 7 5 , 6 6 0 (25,660)(51.31)% 53,040 PW F i l i n g F e e s - R e v e n u e s 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 , 5 6 9 (7,569)(15.13)% 69,584 PW D e p t S v c F e e s 0 0 0 1 , 7 4 8 (1,748)0.00% 4,349 PW R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 6 , 9 9 6 (6,996)0.00% 0 PW D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 0 0 9 , 9 5 9 (9,959)0.00% 9,642 PW M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 8 0 8 PW S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 4, 0 4 7 7, 6 9 3 (7,693)0.00%7,193 PW T o t a l R E V E N U E S 25 0 , 0 0 0 0 43 , 4 1 6 62 5 , 9 0 5 (3 7 5 , 9 0 5 ) (150.36)%643,106 PW PW PE R S O N N E L C O S T S PW W a g e s 2, 4 8 0 , 0 7 3 0 1 8 1 , 2 9 4 2 , 1 0 8 , 2 9 1 3 7 1 , 7 8 2 1 4 . 9 9 % 2 , 0 5 0 , 7 1 5 PW W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 0 0 0 9 , 3 1 9 (9,319)0.00% 8,123 PW O v e r t i m e W a g e s 1 7 , 1 4 3 0 5 0 0 9 , 4 2 5 7 , 7 1 8 4 5 . 0 2 % 9 , 8 4 0 PW F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 1 8 9 , 8 3 2 0 1 3 , 3 8 6 1 5 6 , 6 0 6 3 3 , 2 2 6 1 7 . 5 0 % 1 5 2 , 7 2 4 PW P E R S I 28 0 , 7 0 1 0 2 0 , 5 7 9 2 4 0 , 2 5 2 4 0 , 4 4 9 1 4 . 4 1 % 2 3 3 , 1 2 3 PW W o r k e r s ' C o m p 7 6 , 8 3 9 0 1 1 , 0 3 9 4 2 , 9 8 8 3 3 , 8 5 1 4 4 . 0 5 % 3 9 , 0 0 2 PW E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 5 7 9 , 3 7 5 0 3 4 , 7 5 9 4 0 5 , 1 1 6 1 7 4 , 2 5 9 3 0 . 0 7 % 3 9 8 , 4 1 5 PW U n e m p l o y m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%17,760 PW T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 3 , 6 2 3 , 9 6 3 0 26 1 , 5 5 7 2, 9 7 1 , 9 9 7 651,966 17.99%2,909,703 PW PW OP E R A T I N G C O S T S PW O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1 3 , 4 7 9 0 7 5 2 8 , 7 0 2 4 , 7 7 7 3 5 . 4 3 % 7 , 5 6 5 PW C o p i e r E x p e n s e 8 , 3 6 7 0 6 9 1 8 , 9 6 8 (601)(7.18)% 9,214 PW E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 2 , 4 6 0 0 1 , 2 6 8 2 , 3 1 1 1 4 9 6 . 0 7 % 2 , 1 4 2 PW S a f e t y E x p e n s e 4 , 0 1 4 0 2 2 6 2 , 2 3 0 1 , 7 8 4 4 4 . 4 3 % 2 , 9 3 7 PW F u e l s - G a s 10 , 8 0 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 8 , 9 6 9 1 , 8 3 1 1 6 . 9 5 % 8 , 8 2 1 PW C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 3 , 9 5 0 0 7 4 6 2 , 7 3 1 1 , 2 1 9 3 0 . 8 6 % 1 , 8 8 3 PW C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 9 , 9 1 0 (4,910)(98.20)% 7,145 PW V e h i c l e R e p a i r 4 , 7 0 0 0 0 2 , 2 8 1 2 , 4 1 9 5 1 . 4 7 % 1 , 1 6 6 PW V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 4 , 7 0 0 0 2 3 0 4 , 5 3 5 1 6 5 3 . 5 1 % 3 , 6 3 8 PW S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 4 4 , 4 8 3 0 3 5 6 3 6 , 3 8 5 8 , 0 9 8 1 8 . 2 0 % 2 7 , 8 0 4 PW M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 0 0 0 3 , 8 0 7 (3,807)0.00% 3,273 PW E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 7 7 3 , 7 2 3 7 4 . 4 6 % 5 3 4 PW E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5, 5 0 0 0 2 , 3 9 2 9 , 0 2 4 (3,524)(64.06)% 4,997 PW S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 1 , 5 7 5 2 , 0 3 8 (2,038)0.00% 4,365 PW F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 2 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 7 , 3 9 4 4 , 1 0 6 1 9 . 0 9 % 5 , 4 9 8 PW C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 4, 7 0 0 0 0 6 , 8 0 5 (2,105)(44.78)% 14,415 PW P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 5 1 3 , 5 0 2 (1 9 3 , 5 0 2 ) 4, 0 0 0 5 1 , 0 5 9 2 6 8 , 9 4 2 8 4 . 0 4 % 7 3 , 9 8 8 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 2 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual PW P r o f e s s i o n a l S v c - P W W a s t e w a t e r 52 3 , 3 9 2 2 5 2 , 6 0 8 1 7 9 , 3 9 1 4 0 2 , 4 8 4 3 7 3 , 5 1 6 4 8 . 1 3 % 2 6 0 , 3 9 4 PW P r o f e s s i o n a l S v c - P W W a t e r 4 2 4 , 0 8 8 (9 9 , 2 1 0 ) 28 , 0 6 6 1 6 1 , 9 0 9 1 6 2 , 9 7 0 5 0 . 1 6 % 1 2 5 , 1 9 5 PW P R O F E S S I O N A L S V C f o r Q L P E R e v i e w s 50 , 0 0 0 0 1 2 , 6 2 0 7 9 , 7 4 0 (29,740)(59.48)% 51,740 PW A u d i t & A c c o u n t i n g S e r v i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 , 9 0 0 PW C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 9 , 6 7 7 1 0 , 3 2 3 5 1 . 6 1 % 7 , 8 9 2 PW L e g a l S e r v i c e s 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 9 , 0 2 0 2 3 , 7 8 5 (8,785)(58.56)% 25,309 PW C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 1 , 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 3 3 PW P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 , 8 5 0 0 3 0 4 6 1 1 , 3 8 9 7 5 . 0 5 % 2 9 3 PW P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 1 , 5 0 0 0 3 3 4 2 , 3 5 3 (853)(56.86)% 2,035 PW C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 9 , 4 2 0 0 9 0 7 1 0 , 5 5 0 (1,130)(11.99)% 9,355 PW B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 2 , 1 6 5 (2,065)(2,065.78)%711 PW M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 8 0 0 4 1 3 2 4 9 2 6 . 9 4 % 3 3 9 PW E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 8 5 , 9 2 2 0 3 , 5 1 8 6 5 , 8 0 9 2 0 , 1 1 3 2 3 . 4 0 % 5 8 , 9 1 5 PW T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 5 , 4 5 9 0 2 , 1 9 6 4 , 3 0 9 1 1 , 1 5 0 7 2 . 1 2 % 5 , 5 3 6 PW T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 1 , 3 1 4 0 2 , 0 3 1 7 , 6 0 5 3 , 7 0 9 3 2 . 7 8 % 1 2 , 5 4 4 PW T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 8 , 1 0 2 0 1 , 3 0 2 4 , 9 3 8 3 , 1 6 5 3 9 . 0 5 % 7 , 0 6 8 PW C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 3 PW A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 5 1 , 1 0 0 0 1 , 8 9 5 8 , 1 6 6 4 2 , 9 3 5 8 4 . 0 2 % 1 5 , 7 5 5 PW L e g a l N o t i c e s 27 0 0 0 7 3 1 9 7 7 2 . 9 1 % 1 , 2 2 8 PW P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 4 , 5 2 0 0 0 1 , 4 6 5 3 , 0 5 5 6 7 . 5 9 % 1 , 6 8 9 PW I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 4 , 7 7 2 0 0 0 4 , 7 7 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 9 4 , 8 6 2 0 5 4 2 7 6 , 4 2 3 1 8 , 4 3 9 1 9 . 4 3 % 7 7 , 7 9 4 PW H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 61 5 0 0 6 1 5 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 1 5 PW P e n a l t i e s / S e t t l e m e n t s / F o r f e i t u r e s 0 0 0 3 , 6 4 4 (3,644)0.00% 5,496 PW E m p l o y e e E d u c a t i o n R e i m b u r s e m e n t 0 0 0 1, 7 8 5 (1,785)0.00%0 PW T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1 , 9 7 5 , 7 2 3 (4 0 , 1 0 5 ) 25 5 , 8 9 4 1, 0 4 6 , 5 1 1 889,107 45.93%854,775 PW PW Ca p i t a l O u t l a y PW C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 6 4 , 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 6 1 , 9 2 1 2 , 0 7 9 3 . 2 4 % 0 PW C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 0 0 10 , 4 2 8 55 , 4 2 8 (55,428)0.00%0 PW T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 64 , 0 0 0 0 10 , 7 5 9 11 7 , 3 4 9 (53,349)(83.36)%0 PW PW DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 5, 6 6 3 , 6 8 6 (4 0 , 1 0 5 ) 52 8 , 2 1 0 4, 1 3 5 , 8 5 6 1, 4 8 7 , 7 2 5 26.45%3,764,477 PW PW Tr a n s f e r s PW P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 1 9 6 , 6 9 6 0 6 , 1 8 2 9 0 , 6 3 3 1 0 6 , 0 6 3 5 3 . 9 2 % 9 0 , 0 2 1 PW O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 9 6 , 8 8 7 0 9, 1 1 7 86 , 3 8 0 10,507 10.84%97,296 PW T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 29 3 , 5 8 3 0 15 , 2 9 9 17 7 , 0 1 3 116,570 39.71%187,317 PW PW TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 5, 9 5 7 , 2 6 9 (4 0 , 1 0 5 ) 54 3 , 5 0 9 4, 3 1 2 , 8 6 9 1, 6 0 4 , 2 9 5 27.11%3,951,794 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 3 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual MU B S 3 3 0 0 - M e r i d i a n U t i l i t y B i l l i n g MU B S RE V E N U E S MU B S D e p t S v c F e e s 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 3 , 6 3 9 2 6 , 3 6 2 8 7 . 8 7 % 3 8 , 1 4 5 MU B S R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 1 5 (15)0.00% 0 MU B S G a r b a g e - A d m i n F e e R e v e n u e 6 4 9 , 2 7 1 0 1 2 6 , 2 1 6 7 3 5 , 2 5 6 (85,985)(13.24)% 688,552 MU B S M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%20 MU B S T o t a l R E V E N U E S 67 9 , 2 7 1 0 12 6 , 5 7 6 73 8 , 9 1 0 (59,639)(8.78)%726,716 MU B S MU B S PE R S O N N E L C O S T S MU B S W a g e s 28 1 , 9 8 3 0 2 5 , 0 2 0 2 8 5 , 4 3 7 (3,454)(1.22)% 262,984 MU B S O v e r t i m e W a g e s 2 , 8 0 4 0 1 0 3 4 , 3 0 6 (1,502)(53.57)% 4,615 MU B S F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 21 , 7 8 6 0 1 , 8 0 9 2 0 , 7 6 5 1 , 0 2 1 4 . 6 8 % 1 9 , 3 5 2 MU B S P E R S I 32 , 2 3 8 0 2 , 8 4 4 3 2 , 7 9 9 (561)(1.73)% 30,292 MU B S W o r k e r s ' C o m p 76 9 0 1 6 0 6 2 1 1 4 8 1 9 . 2 9 % 5 3 0 MU B S E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 9 9 , 4 0 0 0 5, 9 0 6 70 , 6 1 3 28,787 28.96%71,933 MU B S T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 4 3 8 , 9 8 0 0 35 , 8 4 2 41 4 , 5 4 0 24,440 5.57%389,707 MU B S MU B S OP E R A T I N G C O S T S MU B S O f f i c e E x p e n s e 6 , 0 0 0 0 2 5 6 5 , 0 9 2 9 0 8 1 5 . 1 3 % 4 , 5 3 6 MU B S C o p i e r E x p e n s e 5 , 3 5 0 0 8 8 3 6 , 2 4 4 (894)(16.71)% 6,991 MU B S E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 4 2 0 0 0 2 4 7 1 7 3 4 1 . 2 8 % 4 2 8 MU B S C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 8 MU B S D a t a A c c e s s E x p e n s e 1 , 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 5 0 MU B S S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 3 0 , 5 2 4 0 0 3 0 , 5 6 0 (36)(0.11)% 4,865 MU B S M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 1 6 , 0 5 0 0 3 5 6 8 , 5 6 0 7 , 4 9 0 4 6 . 6 6 % 8 , 8 6 0 MU B S E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1, 6 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 4 7 4 5 3 2 8 . 3 0 % 2 , 2 8 5 MU B S F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 , 7 4 4 MU B S C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 7 , 7 9 4 MU B S L o c k b o x S e r v i c e s 2 2 , 6 0 0 0 1 , 4 8 0 1 8 , 1 9 9 4 , 4 0 1 1 9 . 4 7 % 1 8 , 1 3 4 MU B S I V R P h o n e S e r v i c e s 1 7 , 4 0 0 0 1 , 1 6 1 1 3 , 4 9 6 3 , 9 0 4 2 2 . 4 3 % 1 4 , 6 6 6 MU B S P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 1 5 7 2 4 2 , 5 7 3 7 , 4 2 7 2 . 9 7 % 2 3 6 , 2 9 4 MU B S B u s i n e s s M e a l s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 0 MU B S E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 3 , 6 5 0 0 0 0 3 , 6 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 1 2 5 0 0 5 8 1 5 4 4 4 8 . 3 4 % 0 MU B S T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 , 1 2 5 0 0 7 1 0 4 1 5 3 6 . 9 2 % 0 MU B S T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 7 5 0 0 0 6 7 2 7 8 1 0 . 4 0 % 0 MU B S P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 , 4 2 5 (1,425)(14.25)% 17,103 MU B S I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 1 8 0 0 0 5 0 1 3 0 7 2 . 2 2 % 1 0 0 MU B S H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 10 5 0 0 1 0 4 1 1 . 0 6 % 9 8 MU B S B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 1 7 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 8 , 2 8 7 1 8 1 , 2 2 5 (11,225)(6.60)% 170,110 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 4 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual MU B S A / R W r i t e o f f s & L o s s 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 (3 9 7 ) 46 , 6 1 9 (26,618)(133.09)%7,984 MU B S T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 5 5 9 , 1 7 9 0 42 , 1 8 2 56 7 , 5 0 3 (8,324)(1.49)%515,090 MU B S MU B S Ca p i t a l O u t l a y MU B S C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 2 2 6 , 6 5 3 (1 4 8 , 3 9 3 ) 7, 0 9 5 38 , 7 8 2 39,478 50.44%374,512 MU B S T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 22 6 , 6 5 3 (1 4 8 , 3 9 3 ) 7, 0 9 5 38 , 7 8 2 39,478 50.44%374,512 MU B S MU B S DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 2 2 4 , 8 1 2 (1 4 8 , 3 9 3 ) 85 , 1 1 9 1, 0 2 0 , 8 2 5 55,594 5.16%1,279,308 MU B S MU B S TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 2 2 4 , 8 1 2 (1 4 8 , 3 9 3 ) 85 , 1 1 9 1, 0 2 0 , 8 2 5 55,594 5.16%1,279,308 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 5 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r 3 4 0 0 - W a t e r D e p a r t m e n t Wa t e r RE V E N U E S Wa t e r D e p t S v c F e e s 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 7 , 3 8 3 2 9 2 , 6 5 8 (42,658)(17.06)% 239,164 Wa t e r R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 2 7 3 (273)0.00% 6,777 Wa t e r R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 0 2 9 0 (290)0.00% 104 Wa t e r R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 0 1 , 7 0 7 (1,707)0.00% 5,026 Wa t e r R e n t a l I n c o m e 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 8 , 2 8 5 8 4 , 6 9 4 (64,694)(323.46)% 57,792 Wa t e r W a t e r / S e w e r S a l e s R e v e n u e 8 , 0 5 5 , 4 4 5 0 9 9 8 , 2 4 0 8 , 2 7 1 , 9 8 8 (2 1 6 , 5 4 3 ) (2.68)% 8,341,286 Wa t e r M e t e r / E q u i p S a l e s R e v e n u e s 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 8 , 6 7 1 4 4 3 , 5 9 0 (2 4 3 , 5 9 0 ) (121.79)% 383,268 Wa t e r M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 , 3 3 6 Wa t e r S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%7,793 Wa t e r T o t a l R E V E N U E S 8, 5 2 5 , 4 4 5 0 1, 0 7 2 , 5 8 0 9, 0 9 5 , 1 9 9 (5 6 9 , 7 5 4 ) (6.68)%9,045,545 Wa t e r Wa t e r PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Wa t e r W a g e s 1, 1 7 2 , 0 4 9 0 9 8 , 1 1 1 1 , 0 9 2 , 9 7 7 7 9 , 0 7 2 6 . 7 4 % 1 , 0 0 1 , 1 4 5 Wa t e r O v e r t i m e W a g e s 3 1 , 2 7 8 0 2 , 7 8 6 4 0 , 8 8 7 (9,609)(30.72)% 38,189 Wa t e r F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 92 , 0 5 5 0 7 , 2 4 6 8 1 , 2 3 8 1 0 , 8 1 7 1 1 . 7 5 % 7 5 , 0 1 1 Wa t e r P E R S I 13 6 , 2 1 7 0 1 1 , 4 2 2 1 2 7 , 7 9 6 8 , 4 2 1 6 . 1 8 % 1 1 6 , 7 8 2 Wa t e r W o r k e r s ' C o m p 4 0 , 9 6 2 0 6 , 9 1 5 2 6 , 7 9 9 1 4 , 1 6 3 3 4 . 5 7 % 2 2 , 6 4 4 Wa t e r E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 3 5 5 , 0 0 0 0 29 , 1 5 8 33 8 , 6 3 1 16,369 4.61%291,513 Wa t e r T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1 , 8 2 7 , 5 6 1 0 15 5 , 6 3 8 1, 7 0 8 , 3 2 7 119,233 6.52%1,545,283 Wa t e r Wa t e r OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Wa t e r O f f i c e E x p e n s e 7 , 5 0 0 0 3 8 2 7 , 4 0 5 9 5 1 . 2 7 % 8 , 5 1 4 Wa t e r C o p i e r E x p e n s e 6 , 5 2 6 0 1 , 2 3 7 5 , 5 4 3 9 8 3 1 5 . 0 6 % 5 , 1 8 9 Wa t e r E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 1 , 5 0 0 0 9 5 7 1 , 5 9 2 (92)(6.14)% 1,320 Wa t e r C h e m i c a l s 85 , 0 0 0 0 1 9 , 8 8 8 8 8 , 2 3 4 (3,234)(3.80)% 76,109 Wa t e r J a n i t o r i a l 15 , 6 9 4 0 3 4 8 3 , 9 2 2 1 1 , 7 7 2 7 5 . 0 1 % 4 , 1 8 1 Wa t e r S a f e t y E x p e n s e 1 0 , 1 5 0 0 9 6 5 1 1 , 6 7 2 (1,522)(14.99)% 9,087 Wa t e r S h o p S u p p l i e s 7, 0 0 0 0 5 4 4 6 , 7 4 4 2 5 6 3 . 6 5 % 4 , 0 9 6 Wa t e r F u e l s - G a s 45 , 4 2 5 0 6 , 7 2 9 3 2 , 8 0 9 1 2 , 6 1 6 2 7 . 7 7 % 2 7 , 6 4 5 Wa t e r F u e l s - D i e s e l / P r o p a n e 3 , 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 7 5 8 2 4 2 8 . 0 5 % 1 , 6 8 0 Wa t e r C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 4 , 4 0 0 0 1 , 5 8 2 8 , 4 7 2 (4,072)(92.54)% 2,578 Wa t e r M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 6 Wa t e r W a t e r M e t e r s 5 1 6 , 5 0 0 0 1 9 0 , 8 0 3 3 3 1 , 3 0 3 1 8 5 , 1 9 7 3 5 . 8 5 % 7 4 0 , 6 9 1 Wa t e r C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 0 0 0 7 0 (70)0.00% 4 Wa t e r B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 2 6 , 5 9 5 0 1 , 4 2 5 2 2 , 5 0 9 4 , 0 8 6 1 5 . 3 6 % 3 4 , 6 9 8 Wa t e r V e h i c l e R e p a i r 1 0 , 8 5 0 0 2 , 6 5 5 5 , 8 5 9 4 , 9 9 1 4 6 . 0 0 % 6 , 2 5 6 Wa t e r V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 0 , 8 5 0 0 3 4 4 2 3 , 2 7 1 (12,420)(114.47)% 36,436 Wa t e r E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 6 , 0 3 5 0 1 , 2 0 6 4 , 3 1 0 1 , 7 2 5 2 8 . 5 7 % 3 , 4 0 9 Wa t e r R o l l i n g S t o c k R e p a i r 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 8 3 3 1 , 6 6 7 6 6 . 6 9 % 0 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 6 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r R o l l i n g S t o c k M a i n t e n a n c e 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 7 5 0 6 9 . 9 9 % 2 , 5 3 2 Wa t e r G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 3 , 5 0 0 0 6 5 0 3 , 7 7 0 (270)(7.70)% 2,165 Wa t e r L i n e W a t / S e w M a i n t e n a n c e 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 1 1 1 1 7 , 8 2 8 2 , 1 7 2 1 0 . 8 5 % 6 3 , 9 2 3 Wa t e r L i n e W a t / S e w R e p a i r 1 8 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 4 , 0 3 4 1 3 3 , 0 8 5 4 6 , 9 1 5 2 6 . 0 6 % 5 8 , 5 2 9 Wa t e r S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 4 4 , 0 9 4 0 3 7 0 2 6 , 5 6 1 1 7 , 5 3 3 3 9 . 7 6 % 3 8 , 2 7 4 Wa t e r A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 3 , 7 0 4 0 0 1 , 8 9 5 1 , 8 0 9 4 8 . 8 4 % 2 , 0 0 9 Wa t e r F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 1 0 0 0 0 8 5 1 5 1 4 . 9 6 % 0 Wa t e r E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 8 0 , 4 0 0 0 2 5 , 3 2 7 7 8 , 0 0 3 2 , 3 9 7 2 . 9 8 % 4 3 , 5 0 9 Wa t e r W e l l M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 1 4 4 , 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 5 5 , 6 1 1 1 8 6 , 4 3 0 (22,430)(13.67)% 184,563 Wa t e r E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5, 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 , 4 9 5 (7,495)(149.90)% 10,086 Wa t e r S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 , 9 2 6 Wa t e r F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 2 , 0 0 0 0 4 6 9 2 , 2 0 4 (204)(10.18)% 10,020 Wa t e r C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 13 , 0 3 0 0 0 8 , 8 6 9 4 , 1 6 1 3 1 . 9 3 % 9 , 4 0 0 Wa t e r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 1 4 6 , 7 0 4 (6 0 , 7 0 4 ) 2, 0 7 1 8 , 4 3 3 7 7 , 5 6 8 9 0 . 1 9 % 5 1 , 9 3 9 Wa t e r C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 1 4 , 8 0 0 0 2 , 1 6 5 2 0 , 7 4 8 (5,947)(40.18)% 25,422 Wa t e r P r e v e n t a t i v e H e a l t h E x p 0 0 0 2 3 0 (230)0.00% 0 Wa t e r W a t e r T e s t i n g 1 3 1 , 2 3 0 0 1 8 , 5 6 7 1 2 2 , 4 5 5 8 , 7 7 5 6 . 6 8 % 9 8 , 7 9 9 Wa t e r D E Q W a t e r A s s e s s m e n t 9 7 , 9 3 6 0 0 9 7 , 1 3 4 8 0 2 0 . 8 1 % 9 4 , 4 1 4 Wa t e r C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 (1,500)0.00% 0 Wa t e r W e l l A s s e s s m e n t / A b a n d o n m e n t 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 4 8 , 5 0 0 9 7 . 0 0 % 8 8 , 1 2 7 Wa t e r T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 3 , 6 0 0 0 3 4 3 3 , 8 4 4 (244)(6.77)% 3,885 Wa t e r P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 0 , 3 7 2 0 2 6 4 1 2 , 0 7 0 (1,698)(16.36)% 12,160 Wa t e r P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 9 , 8 9 3 0 1 , 2 8 0 1 3 , 5 4 8 (3,655)(36.94)% 7,750 Wa t e r C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1 2 , 0 2 0 0 9 9 5 1 1 , 8 1 3 2 0 7 1 . 7 1 % 1 0 , 2 3 5 Wa t e r B u s i n e s s M e a l s 30 0 0 0 1 8 4 1 1 6 3 8 . 6 9 % 3 5 3 Wa t e r M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 2 , 1 1 0 0 1 , 4 8 6 1 0 , 2 5 8 1 , 8 5 2 1 5 . 2 9 % 4 , 8 2 1 Wa t e r T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 3 , 7 5 9 0 0 1 , 6 7 2 2 , 0 8 7 5 5 . 5 1 % 6 6 1 Wa t e r T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 3 , 7 5 9 0 0 2 , 6 8 2 1 , 0 7 7 2 8 . 6 4 % 8 9 4 Wa t e r T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2 , 0 9 9 0 0 1 , 0 5 6 1 , 0 4 4 4 9 . 7 1 % 5 7 6 Wa t e r A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 7 , 8 0 0 2 4 , 0 4 9 0 2 9 , 3 3 4 2 , 5 1 4 7 . 8 9 % 6 , 7 7 1 Wa t e r L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 8 Wa t e r P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 1 0 , 0 5 0 0 5 , 1 6 6 6 , 9 4 5 3 , 1 0 5 3 0 . 8 9 % 1 0 , 4 0 3 Wa t e r I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 3 6 , 6 3 2 0 (1 , 2 1 4 ) 31 , 2 5 6 5 , 3 7 6 1 4 . 6 7 % 3 1 , 8 1 9 Wa t e r E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 4 0 9 , 0 0 0 0 4 6 , 4 6 9 3 9 6 , 8 9 6 1 2 , 1 0 4 2 . 9 5 % 3 9 4 , 9 8 2 Wa t e r I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 7 , 6 3 9 2 , 3 6 1 2 3 . 6 0 % 9 , 3 1 6 Wa t e r S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 9 6 1 , 4 0 4 9 3 . 5 7 % 1 , 1 5 4 Wa t e r E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 5 3 1 9 , 0 2 2 (14,022)(280.43)% 38,080 Wa t e r D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 7 , 9 0 7 0 5 6 1 6 , 8 2 7 1 , 0 8 0 1 3 . 6 5 % 5 , 7 0 9 Wa t e r I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 6 3 5 3 6 5 9 . 1 3 % 3 , 6 6 0 Wa t e r H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 37 5 0 0 37 5 0 0.00%310 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 7 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2 , 2 4 9 , 1 0 0 (1 6 , 6 5 6 ) 44 7 , 6 6 1 1, 8 4 0 , 4 3 1 392,013 17.56%2,300,141 Wa t e r Wa t e r Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Wa t e r C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 3 6 6 , 8 0 5 (1 9 1 , 8 0 5 ) 0 1 8 3 , 7 4 1 (8,741)(4.99)% 69,658 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 0 4 2 3 , 6 1 5 1 6 8 , 6 3 9 2 7 0 , 8 8 1 1 5 2 , 7 3 4 3 6 . 0 5 % 3 3 8 , 6 1 4 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 9 3 , 5 7 0 0 0 0 9 3 , 5 7 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 11 9 , 2 7 8 722 0.60%0 Wa t e r T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 59 0 , 3 7 5 23 1 , 8 1 0 16 8 , 6 3 9 57 3 , 9 0 0 248,285 30.20%408,272 Wa t e r Wa t e r DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 4, 6 6 7 , 0 3 5 21 5 , 1 5 5 77 1 , 9 3 8 4, 1 2 2 , 6 5 9 759,531 15.55%4,253,696 Wa t e r Wa t e r Tr a n s f e r s Wa t e r P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 8 9 1 , 8 1 6 0 7 1 , 1 2 5 8 5 8 , 6 2 5 3 3 , 1 9 1 3 . 7 2 % 8 4 5 , 9 9 5 Wa t e r O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 1 9 4 , 8 9 5 0 9, 8 2 8 13 7 , 7 1 9 57,176 29.33%139,154 Wa t e r T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 1, 0 8 6 , 7 1 0 0 80 , 9 5 3 99 6 , 3 4 3 90,367 8.32%985,149 Wa t e r Wa t e r TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 5, 7 5 3 , 7 4 5 21 5 , 1 5 5 85 2 , 8 9 1 5, 1 1 9 , 0 0 3 849,897 14.23%5,238,845 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 8 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r 3 4 9 0 - W a t e r C o n s t r u c t i o n Wa t e r RE V E N U E S Wa t e r R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 , 8 9 1 Wa t e r A s s e s s m e n t s - R e s i d e n t i a l R e v e n u e 1, 9 8 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 , 9 2 2 2 , 7 5 1 , 9 7 7 (7 7 1 , 9 7 7 ) (38.98)% 2,405,232 Wa t e r A s s e s s m e n t s - C o m m e r c i a l R e v e n u e 30 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 0 , 0 7 5 5 3 1 , 5 3 4 (2 3 1 , 5 3 4 ) (77.17)% 327,374 Wa t e r A s s e s s m e n t s - M u l t i f a m i l y R e v e n u e 10 0 , 0 0 0 0 9 4 , 7 0 4 1 , 1 7 9 , 4 2 0 (1 , 0 7 9 , 4 2 0 ) (1,079.42)%182,270 Wa t e r I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 7 , 2 7 1 2 1 2 , 8 2 4 (62,824)(41.88)% 164,694 Wa t e r U n r e a l i z e d G a i n o n I n v e s t m e n t s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%26,715 Wa t e r T o t a l R E V E N U E S 2, 5 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 37 6 , 9 7 2 4, 6 7 5 , 7 5 4 (2 , 1 4 5 , 7 5 5 ) (84.81)%3,111,177 Wa t e r Wa t e r OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Wa t e r L i n e W a t / S e w R e p a i r 0 0 0 1 5 9 (159)0.00% 0 Wa t e r I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 1 8 , 0 0 0 0 8 4 0 1 0 , 0 1 6 7 , 9 8 4 4 4 . 3 5 % 1 0 , 0 0 0 Wa t e r D e v e l o p m e n t E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%37,371 Wa t e r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 18 , 0 0 0 0 84 0 10 , 1 7 5 7,825 43.47%47,371 Wa t e r Wa t e r Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Wa t e r C a p i t a l O u t l a y - L a n d 6 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 , 8 1 5 3 , 1 8 5 5 . 3 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 2 1 , 5 3 5 0 0 0 2 1 , 5 3 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 8 , 4 6 5 Wa t e r B u i l d i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 , 5 9 2 2 2 , 4 0 8 2 2 . 4 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 3 5 , 0 0 0 (3 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 (3 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - C o m m u n i c a t i o n E q u i p m e n t 84 , 5 0 1 0 0 2 6 , 0 7 3 5 8 , 4 2 8 6 9 . 1 4 % 0 Wa t e r S e r v i c e L i n e / M a i n R e p l a c e m e n t 1 , 1 9 0 , 9 2 0 (2 6 1 , 3 9 9 ) 93 , 9 2 9 6 9 6 , 0 3 6 2 3 3 , 4 8 5 2 5 . 1 1 % 3 0 5 , 8 4 3 Wa t e r W e l l # 1 5 10 0 , 0 0 0 0 4 , 6 3 1 9 7 , 7 2 6 2 , 2 7 4 2 . 2 7 % 0 Wa t e r W E L L # 1 9 C O N S T R U C T I O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 0 7 , 5 2 6 Wa t e r W E L L # 2 1 C O N S T R U C T I O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 3 , 5 9 6 Wa t e r W e l l 2 9 c o n s t r u c t i o n 1 , 1 7 0 , 7 4 4 (2 7 0 , 2 9 7 ) 22 3 , 3 1 8 3 4 2 , 0 1 9 5 5 8 , 4 2 7 6 2 . 0 1 % 3 4 6 , 6 5 5 Wa t e r W e l l # 2 2 C o n s t r u c t i o n 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 6 , 2 6 8 8 1 , 9 4 2 7 1 8 , 0 5 8 8 9 . 7 5 % 0 Wa t e r W e l l 1 4 C o n s t r u c t i o n U p g r a d e s 2 1 , 5 2 8 (2 1 , 5 2 8 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 1 , 6 0 6 Wa t e r W e l l # 3 0 87 7 , 2 6 3 (3 2 , 8 9 4 ) 14 0 , 0 1 3 3 3 0 , 3 2 7 5 1 4 , 0 4 2 6 0 . 8 7 % 2 9 8 , 0 1 9 Wa t e r W A T E R L I N E E X T E N S I O N S 3 , 0 4 2 , 2 9 4 (7 1 3 , 4 6 4 ) 49 7 , 3 2 4 1 , 2 6 7 , 7 1 8 1 , 0 6 1 , 1 1 2 4 5 . 5 6 % 6 9 5 , 7 2 1 Wa t e r W e l l # 2 7 c o n s t r u c t i o n 1 , 1 4 7 , 2 2 7 (7 3 0 , 8 5 4 ) 17 0 3 7 1 , 2 7 9 4 5 , 0 9 4 1 0 . 8 3 % 9 9 9 , 1 9 6 Wa t e r W e l l # 3 2 c a p i t a l 5 2 1 , 4 6 0 39 , 7 9 2 47 , 7 0 0 51 3 , 5 1 0 47,742 8.50%250,748 Wa t e r T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 9 , 4 7 2 , 4 7 3 (2 , 3 2 5 , 6 4 5 ) 1, 0 3 3 , 3 5 4 3, 8 6 1 , 0 3 8 3, 2 8 5 , 7 9 1 45.98%3,297,374 Wa t e r Wa t e r DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 9, 4 9 0 , 4 7 3 (2 , 3 2 5 , 6 4 5 ) 1, 0 3 4 , 1 9 4 3, 8 7 1 , 2 1 3 3, 2 9 3 , 6 1 6 45.96%3,344,744 Wa t e r Wa t e r TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 9, 4 9 0 , 4 7 3 (2 , 3 2 5 , 6 4 5 ) 1, 0 3 4 , 1 9 4 3, 8 7 1 , 2 1 3 3, 2 9 3 , 6 1 6 45.96%3,344,744 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 5 9 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW T P 3 5 0 0 - W a s t e W a t e r F a c i l i t y WW T P RE V E N U E S WW T P R e v i e w F e e s 0 0 1 , 5 2 4 1 7 , 9 7 3 (17,973)0.00% 20,474 WW T P G r a n t R e v e n u e - C a p i t a l 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 4 2 WW T P R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 1 4 7 , 6 1 4 (1 4 7 , 6 1 4 ) 0.00% 27,053 WW T P R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 0 5 8 3 (583)0.00% 69 WW T P W a t e r / S e w e r S a l e s R e v e n u e 1 4 , 9 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 3 2 6 , 1 2 7 1 4 , 8 9 9 , 2 4 7 7 5 3 0 . 0 0 % 1 4 , 3 6 6 , 7 5 4 WW T P M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 2 , 8 4 9 (2,849)0.00% 840 WW T P S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%2,247 WW T P T o t a l R E V E N U E S 14 , 9 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 1, 3 2 7 , 6 5 1 15 , 0 6 8 , 2 6 6 (1 6 8 , 2 6 6 ) (1.13)%14,418,278 WW T P WW T P PE R S O N N E L C O S T S WW T P W a g e s 1, 7 6 4 , 1 1 6 0 1 4 3 , 8 9 1 1 , 6 8 8 , 7 5 3 7 5 , 3 6 2 4 . 2 7 % 1 , 6 8 9 , 2 1 0 WW T P O v e r t i m e W a g e s 4 7 , 7 4 9 0 3 , 7 3 4 5 4 , 0 7 2 (6,323)(13.24)% 50,303 WW T P F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 1 3 8 , 6 0 8 0 1 0 , 7 7 2 1 2 7 , 7 3 5 1 0 , 8 7 3 7 . 8 4 % 1 2 7 , 0 4 5 WW T P P E R S I 20 5 , 1 0 3 0 1 6 , 6 4 9 1 9 6 , 9 0 1 8 , 2 0 2 3 . 9 9 % 1 9 5 , 7 7 2 WW T P W o r k e r s ' C o m p 6 2 , 2 6 4 0 9 , 3 7 6 3 9 , 1 5 8 2 3 , 1 0 6 3 7 . 1 0 % 3 7 , 5 8 8 WW T P E m p l o y e e I n s u r a n c e 5 3 9 , 6 0 0 0 3 4 , 3 4 4 4 3 2 , 8 8 4 1 0 6 , 7 1 6 1 9 . 7 7 % 4 4 3 , 7 2 5 WW T P U n e m p l o y m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%1,876 WW T P T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 2 , 7 5 7 , 4 4 0 0 21 8 , 7 6 6 2, 5 3 9 , 5 0 3 217,937 7.90%2,545,518 WW T P WW T P OP E R A T I N G C O S T S WW T P O f f i c e E x p e n s e 9 , 6 5 0 0 1 , 1 2 0 9 , 4 3 3 2 1 7 2 . 2 5 % 6 , 4 6 2 WW T P C o p i e r E x p e n s e 1 9 , 2 8 6 0 2 , 1 7 1 1 5 , 7 8 5 3 , 5 0 1 1 8 . 1 5 % 1 3 , 5 7 4 WW T P E m p l o y e e C o f f e e & M i s c 2 , 2 8 0 0 6 8 5 1 , 7 7 1 5 0 9 2 2 . 3 3 % 2 , 0 6 6 WW T P C h e m i c a l s 40 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 4 , 0 1 6 4 7 9 , 0 3 7 (79,037)(19.75)% 401,423 WW T P J a n i t o r i a l 22 , 4 1 0 0 2 , 2 2 5 1 9 , 8 8 6 2 , 5 2 4 1 1 . 2 6 % 2 1 , 1 7 6 WW T P S a f e t y E x p e n s e 3 1 , 3 0 0 1 4 , 8 6 3 1 , 1 6 9 5 1 , 2 9 5 (5,132)(11.11)% 15,805 WW T P S h o p S u p p l i e s 6 9 , 1 5 0 0 1 0 , 7 0 7 6 2 , 4 3 4 6 , 7 1 6 9 . 7 1 % 5 3 , 8 9 3 WW T P F u e l s - G a s 16 , 7 5 0 0 3 , 0 3 8 1 6 , 8 2 8 (79)(0.46)% 17,148 WW T P F u e l s - D i e s e l / P r o p a n e 3 8 , 0 0 0 (1 0 , 0 0 0 ) 3, 5 6 8 1 2 , 6 3 7 1 5 , 3 6 3 5 4 . 8 6 % 1 7 , 9 5 5 WW T P C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 6 , 1 5 0 0 5 7 1 4 , 9 5 5 1 , 1 9 5 1 9 . 4 3 % 4 , 7 9 2 WW T P M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 1 , 0 0 0 0 4 3 6 7 5 0 2 5 0 2 5 . 0 1 % 5 2 1 WW T P C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 0 2 6 WW T P B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 5 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 1 , 5 7 3 5 1 , 5 2 0 3 , 4 8 0 6 . 3 2 % 4 1 , 5 4 9 WW T P P l a n t M a i n t e n a n c e 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 7 4 , 0 0 0 5 7 , 7 9 8 3 5 9 , 5 4 6 1 4 , 4 5 4 3 . 8 6 % 2 0 6 , 2 8 2 WW T P P l a n t R e p a i r s 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 9 , 6 1 1 1 1 6 , 9 3 8 3 3 , 0 6 2 2 2 . 0 4 % 9 3 , 0 8 7 WW T P P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 6 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 6 8 0 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 7 2 9 WW T P V e h i c l e R e p a i r 2 4 , 6 0 0 0 3 , 6 3 1 2 9 , 3 3 6 (4,736)(19.25)% 29,189 WW T P V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 4 , 4 0 0 0 9 5 8 1 8 , 1 7 9 6 , 2 2 1 2 5 . 4 9 % 3 0 , 5 4 0 WW T P E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 7 1 , 0 0 0 0 7 4 2 2 6 , 5 2 0 4 4 , 4 8 0 6 2 . 6 4 % 6 2 , 1 3 6 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 6 0 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW T P R o l l i n g S t o c k R e p a i r 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 6 , 7 9 7 3 , 2 0 3 3 2 . 0 3 % 9 , 0 0 5 WW T P R o l l i n g S t o c k M a i n t e n a n c e 8 , 5 0 0 0 3 9 0 8 , 3 6 6 1 3 4 1 . 5 7 % 3 , 8 7 1 WW T P G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 1 1 5 1 4 , 2 9 7 7 0 3 4 . 6 8 % 1 8 , 0 0 9 WW T P L i f t S t a t i o n M a i n t 2 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 6 , 8 9 7 4 4 , 3 6 6 (9,366)(26.75)% 27,993 WW T P L i f t S t a t i o n R e p a i r 3 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 5 0 2 2 , 8 3 7 1 2 , 1 6 4 3 4 . 7 5 % 9 9 , 4 2 6 WW T P L i n e W a t / S e w M a i n t e n a n c e 2 0 , 3 0 0 0 1 , 5 3 6 1 0 , 0 9 1 1 0 , 2 0 9 5 0 . 2 9 % 3 1 , 4 0 4 WW T P L i n e W a t / S e w R e p a i r 1 1 0 , 0 0 0 6 0 , 3 1 6 7 7 , 7 3 5 1 9 0 , 8 0 5 (20,489)(12.02)% 73,424 WW T P S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 8 , 5 4 5 4 , 5 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 5 3 , 9 8 4 9 , 0 6 1 1 4 . 3 7 % 4 4 , 3 1 7 WW T P A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 2 , 6 0 0 0 0 3 , 2 2 7 (627)(24.13)% 4,743 WW T P F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 8 0 6 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 1 9 6 , 5 0 0 5 , 9 1 2 5 9 , 6 4 1 1 7 3 , 2 9 3 2 9 , 1 1 9 1 4 . 3 8 % 1 4 3 , 7 7 8 WW T P E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 7, 7 3 0 0 2 7 0 8 , 8 9 1 (1,160)(15.01)% 7,793 WW T P S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 48 , 6 0 0 (4 8 , 6 0 0 ) 1, 4 5 9 1 , 4 5 9 (1,459)0.00% 11,309 WW T P F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 5 3 WW T P C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2, 6 0 0 0 0 4 , 4 9 0 (1,890)(72.67)% 13,738 WW T P P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 3 8 0 , 2 2 7 (8 9 , 1 2 7 ) 31 , 1 8 9 2 1 3 , 4 5 3 7 7 , 6 4 7 2 6 . 6 7 % 1 7 8 , 6 9 4 WW T P P r o f e s s i o n a l S v c - P W W a s t e w a t e r 67 5 , 0 0 0 (6 7 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 6 1 2 WW T P P r e v e n t a t i v e H e a l t h E x p 1 , 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 7 9 8 3 8 1 . 9 5 % 1 , 1 2 6 WW T P B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 0 0 0 1 6 (16)0.00% 0 WW T P C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 8 5 , 9 0 0 0 9 , 4 0 5 2 2 , 6 6 0 6 3 , 2 4 0 7 3 . 6 2 % 2 7 , 0 7 7 WW T P T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 7 , 0 5 0 0 5 4 6 4 , 4 5 0 2 , 6 0 0 3 6 . 8 8 % 5 , 3 2 2 WW T P P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1 4 , 3 0 0 0 1 , 2 6 0 3 , 3 1 3 1 0 , 9 8 7 7 6 . 8 3 % 5 , 9 3 1 WW T P P a g e r s / R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 3 6 3 0 6 2 7 3 7 (374)(102.92)% 399 WW T P C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 9 , 6 0 0 0 8 2 3 1 0 , 0 9 5 (495)(5.15)% 9,507 WW T P B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 1 0 6 (6)(5.94)% 99 WW T P E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 2 7 , 9 9 7 0 6 4 0 3 2 , 1 2 3 (4,126)(14.73)% 17,611 WW T P T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 0 , 9 6 5 (3 , 2 6 2 ) 52 6 4 , 2 9 0 3 , 4 1 4 4 4 . 3 1 % 2 , 5 1 6 WW T P T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1 1 , 0 4 0 (2 , 7 7 1 ) 1, 1 3 1 8 , 5 4 9 (280)(3.38)% 3,488 WW T P T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 6 , 1 8 0 (1 , 4 0 4 ) 44 8 3 , 2 0 5 1 , 5 7 1 3 2 . 8 9 % 2 , 1 0 0 WW T P A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 7 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 4 3 3 6 , 1 2 3 8 7 7 1 2 . 5 2 % 5 , 5 4 1 WW T P L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 1 3 9 (139)0.00% 61 WW T P P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g / E n g r a v i n g 1 , 2 8 0 0 1 0 1 9 1 0 3 7 0 2 8 . 9 2 % 8 5 5 WW T P I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 4 6 , 6 2 2 0 0 4 1 , 0 2 2 5 , 6 0 0 1 2 . 0 1 % 4 0 , 4 3 7 WW T P E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 5 4 2 , 0 0 0 0 5 9 , 7 4 3 5 7 7 , 3 7 2 (35,372)(6.52)% 528,707 WW T P I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 7 7 , 5 0 0 0 1 , 8 9 4 8 8 , 2 4 6 (10,746)(13.86)% 61,692 WW T P S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 1 4 5 , 6 5 0 0 1 0 , 1 1 3 1 9 3 , 8 2 4 (48,174)(33.07)% 115,661 WW T P E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 3 3 , 7 4 6 (2 7 , 8 7 9 ) 12 1 5 , 9 3 8 (71)(1.21)% 18,396 WW T P B l d g & S t r u c t u r e s R e n t a l & L e a s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % (255) WW T P D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 5 , 8 4 4 0 8 3 4 , 1 0 0 1 , 7 4 4 2 9 . 8 4 % 5 , 0 4 4 WW T P I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 3 , 2 0 0 0 0 3 , 5 9 1 (391)(12.21)% 3,154 WW T P H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 57 0 0 0 5 8 2 (12)(2.10)% 550 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 6 1 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW T P E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 0 0 0 91 (91)0.00%0 WW T P T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 3 , 8 8 6 , 4 8 5 (6 8 8 , 4 5 2 ) 42 2 , 9 2 8 3, 0 5 1 , 5 2 2 146,511 4.58%2,544,939 WW T P WW T P Ca p i t a l O u t l a y WW T P C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 1 , 8 1 6 WW T P W W T P - B l d g i m p r o v e m e n t s 1 1 , 4 1 1 (1 1 , 4 1 1 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 4 9 7 , 9 8 9 (3 5 , 7 1 4 ) 0 4 6 8 , 6 2 4 (6,349)(1.37)% 28,823 WW T P C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 2 4 0 , 9 4 5 (1 5 3 , 6 3 9 ) 5, 5 0 0 7 1 , 0 2 7 1 6 , 2 7 9 1 8 . 6 4 % 1 8 4 , 3 9 3 WW T P C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 1 3 , 7 6 7 (1 3 , 7 6 7 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 0 0 0 6, 1 1 6 (6,116)0.00%205,331 WW T P T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 76 4 , 1 1 2 (2 1 4 , 5 3 1 ) 5, 5 0 0 54 5 , 7 6 8 3,814 0.69%480,363 WW T P WW T P DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 7, 4 0 8 , 0 3 7 (9 0 2 , 9 8 3 ) 64 7 , 1 9 4 6, 1 3 6 , 7 9 3 368,261 5.66%5,570,819 WW T P WW T P Tr a n s f e r s WW T P P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 8 9 1 , 8 1 6 0 7 2 , 4 1 3 8 7 3 , 9 2 7 1 7 , 8 8 8 2 . 0 0 % 8 6 1 , 7 2 9 WW T P O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e 1 9 4 , 8 9 5 0 9, 8 2 8 13 7 , 7 1 9 57,176 29.33%139,154 WW T P T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 1, 0 8 6 , 7 1 0 0 82 , 2 4 1 1, 0 1 1 , 6 4 6 75,064 6.91%1,000,883 WW T P WW T P TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 8, 4 9 4 , 7 4 7 (9 0 2 , 9 8 3 ) 72 9 , 4 3 5 7, 1 4 8 , 4 3 9 443,325 5.83%6,571,702 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 6 2 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW T P 3 5 9 0 - W a s t e W a t e r C o n s t r u c t i o n WW T P RE V E N U E S WW T P R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 7 , 3 7 9 (7,379)0.00% 8,329 WW T P A s s e s s m e n t s - R e s i d e n t i a l R e v e n u e 3, 3 9 8 , 3 4 3 0 4 4 2 , 5 4 6 5 , 3 4 8 , 0 4 3 (1 , 9 4 9 , 7 0 0 ) (57.37)% 4,789,558 WW T P C a s h D o n a t i o n f o r C a p i t a l O u t l a y 0 0 0 2 0 , 4 3 1 (20,431)0.00% 127,157 WW T P E P A W W C o m p l i a n c e F e e 1 , 4 3 2 , 2 1 5 0 1 2 3 , 7 6 9 1 , 4 5 5 , 2 6 8 (23,053)(1.60)% 1,389,652 WW T P A s s e s s m e n t s - C o m m e r c i a l R e v e n u e 45 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 5 , 0 1 1 9 9 7 , 6 2 7 (5 4 7 , 6 2 7 ) (121.69)% 646,511 WW T P A s s e s s m e n t s - M u l t i f a m i l y R e v e n u e 10 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 8 6 , 4 3 2 2 , 2 0 7 , 3 0 9 (2 , 1 0 7 , 3 0 9 ) (2,107.30)%347,980 WW T P I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 2 2 5 , 0 0 0 0 5 2 , 8 4 1 4 1 6 , 9 0 8 (1 9 1 , 9 0 8 ) (85.29)% 365,940 WW T P U n r e a l i z e d G a i n o n I n v e s t m e n t s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%53,430 WW T P T o t a l R E V E N U E S 5, 6 0 5 , 5 5 8 0 86 0 , 5 9 8 10 , 4 5 2 , 9 6 5 (4 , 8 4 7 , 4 0 8 ) (86.48)%7,728,556 WW T P WW T P PE R S O N N E L C O S T S WW T P W o r k e r s ' C o m p 0 0 0 1, 0 3 6 (1,036)0.00%0 WW T P T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 0 0 0 1, 0 3 6 (1,036)0.00%0 WW T P WW T P OP E R A T I N G C O S T S WW T P B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 , 8 7 4 WW T P S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 4 , 5 0 0 (4 , 5 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 3 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 6 8 0 2 0 , 0 3 2 1 4 , 9 6 8 4 2 . 7 6 % 1 9 , 9 9 9 WW T P L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 9 WW T P F i x e d A s s e t s - G a i n o r L o s s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%(185,300) WW T P T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 39 , 5 0 0 (4 , 5 0 0 ) 1, 6 8 0 20 , 0 3 2 14,968 42.77%(161,348) WW T P WW T P Ca p i t a l O u t l a y WW T P C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 2 4 , 8 9 6 (2 4 , 8 9 6 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 0 , 1 5 9 WW T P B u i l d i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s 2 7 5 , 0 0 0 (2 7 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P W W T P - B l d g i m p r o v e m e n t s 5 4 , 9 1 5 2 , 7 8 5 , 0 8 5 9 2 , 9 3 5 2 1 9 , 6 5 4 2 , 6 2 0 , 3 4 6 9 2 . 2 6 % 1 5 1 , 8 6 6 WW T P S e w e r L i n e E x t e n s i o n s 5 , 2 9 5 , 8 0 7 (1 5 7 , 5 3 3 ) 92 6 , 4 3 3 1 , 8 4 8 , 9 4 0 3 , 2 8 9 , 3 3 4 6 4 . 0 1 % 1 , 4 1 0 , 7 2 6 WW T P C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 1 , 3 0 1 , 9 6 0 (1 , 0 2 8 , 8 7 7 ) 24 3 2 2 0 , 2 7 2 5 2 , 8 1 1 1 9 . 3 3 % 9 1 2 , 4 9 2 WW T P C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 6 3 , 2 4 5 6 , 7 5 5 0 0 7 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 8 , 5 1 5 WW T P C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 2 0 0 , 7 3 5 (1 0 5 , 7 3 5 ) 0 8 1 , 2 6 7 1 3 , 7 3 3 1 4 . 4 5 % 1 3 3 , 8 2 4 WW T P S e r v i c e L i n e / M a i n R e p l a c e m e n t 2 , 8 8 1 , 0 9 3 (8 3 1 , 7 3 8 ) 50 9 , 9 2 3 1 , 7 6 0 , 0 9 9 2 8 9 , 2 5 6 1 4 . 1 1 % 8 7 5 , 1 4 2 WW T P A e r a t i o n B a s i n C o n s t r u c t i o n 5 , 9 5 8 (5 , 9 5 8 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 1 , 6 2 6 WW T P F e r m e n t a t i o n P r o j e c t s 1 5 7 , 4 9 8 (1 5 7 , 4 9 8 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 4 , 5 0 5 WW T P L i f t S t a t i o n c o n s t r u c t i o n 5 2 6 , 0 0 4 (2 0 , 2 3 2 ) 0 4 5 0 , 0 0 4 5 5 , 7 6 7 1 1 . 0 2 % 9 1 , 6 3 8 WW T P P r e D e s i g n o f C a p i t a l P r o j e c t s 1 2 , 7 2 9 , 8 9 3 (5 7 , 3 5 1 ) 1, 9 5 0 , 4 9 0 7 , 0 2 7 , 2 2 7 5 , 6 4 5 , 3 1 6 4 4 . 5 4 % 2 , 6 1 2 , 4 5 5 WW T P B o i s e R i v e r O u t f a l l 1 , 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 (1 4 7 , 0 0 0 ) 61 , 3 0 6 3 6 1 , 5 9 8 6 4 1 , 4 0 2 6 3 . 9 4 % 0 WW T P D A F T u p g r a d e p r o j e c t s 6 6 , 1 8 3 (6 6 , 1 8 3 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 0 3 , 5 9 3 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 6 3 o f 6 4 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e t n o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 9 / 1 / 1 7 t h r o u g h 9 / 3 0 / 1 7 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW T P C e n t r a t e B a s i n C o n s t r u c t i o n 1 , 6 6 2 , 3 3 6 (5 8 0 , 3 2 5 ) 87 , 8 6 3 9 9 2 , 4 2 9 8 9 , 5 8 2 8 . 2 7 % 5 1 1 , 2 1 9 WW T P H e a d w o r k s I m p r o v e m e n t s 7 , 9 0 1 , 3 1 5 (7 7 2 , 7 6 0 ) 69 8 , 2 9 1 2 , 0 3 5 , 1 7 9 5 , 0 9 3 , 3 7 6 7 1 . 4 5 % 7 0 5 , 4 0 8 WW T P R e c l a i m e d W a s t e W a t e r S v c L i n e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 3 9 WW T P U l t r a v i o l e t D i s i n f e c t i o n 1 , 4 7 5 , 2 6 7 (9 5 0 , 2 6 7 ) 0 88 , 1 3 9 436,862 83.21%2,157,884 WW T P T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 3 5 , 7 7 2 , 1 0 7 (2 , 3 8 9 , 5 1 5 ) 4, 3 2 7 , 4 8 3 15 , 0 8 4 , 8 0 8 18 , 2 9 7 , 7 8 5 54.81%9,791,291 WW T P WW T P DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 35 , 8 1 1 , 6 0 7 (2 , 3 9 4 , 0 1 5 ) 4, 3 2 9 , 1 6 3 15 , 1 0 5 , 8 7 6 18 , 3 1 1 , 7 1 7 54.79%9,629,944 WW T P WW T P TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 35 , 8 1 1 , 6 0 7 (2 , 3 9 4 , 0 1 5 ) 4, 3 2 9 , 1 6 3 15 , 1 0 5 , 8 7 6 18 , 3 1 1 , 7 1 7 54.79%9,629,944 Pr e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t a s o f N o v 3 , 2 0 1 7 Pa g e 6 4 o f 6 4 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 41 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: AP Invoices for Payment - $2,752,271.44 MEETING NOTES ,Q - Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund 4345 LINDER ROAD LLC Refund, Surety-2017-0035, Decatur Estates Sub, Release of Su 288,052.33 01 General Fund A-1 HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING install AC unit at Community Center - qty 1 4,370.00 01 General Fund A-1 STAMP & MABEL'S LABELS Nameplates for Chamber, Mike, Michelle, Shawn, Mark, Andrea 60.00 01 General Fund AFLAC T5581, November 2017, AFLAC 3,316.91 01 General Fund AM-PM LOCK & KEY Enter Locked Vehicle for Investigative Purposes 100.00 01 General Fund AMERICAN MECHANICAL CORP 220/Replace thermostat, St. 3 212.00 01 General Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 18-0090, Bills 10/20/17, Delinquent Notices 10/23/17, Insert 158.02 01 General Fund BLUE CROSS OF IDAHO November 2017 Blue Cross Insurance 349,597.04 01 General Fund BLUE360 MEDIA INC Idaho Criminal & Traffic Law Manuals - Qty 15 993.60 01 General Fund BONNEVILLE BLUE PRINT SUPPLY plan copies for Lemp/Larkwood Path & SMRP - qty 846 11.88 01 General Fund BPA HEALTH, INC.EAP, Nov 2017, 450 Employees 1,311.66 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC.220/Janitorial, St. 5, brush holder, hand pads, cleaner, mop 90.53 01 General Fund BRIGHT IDEAS LIGHTING COMPANY Non-Emergency Lighting Repairs @ Homecourt, 10/4/17 120.00 01 General Fund BRODY CHEMICAL INC.granular ice melt - qty 10 3,540.19 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC 220/Lube, Oil Change, Air Filter, MF036 91.40 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC 220/Lube, Oil Change, Air Filter, MF038 79.95 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC fleet truck 9 snow tire change-over - license C16104 29.95 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change for Unit # 161 55.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change for Unit # 164 55.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change, Air Filter, Cabin Air Filter, Tires for Unit#119 803.58 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Rear Axel Seal, Front Brakes & Rotors for Unit# 120 757.11 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Rear Axel Seal, Front Brakes & Rotors Labor Disc on Unit#120 (111.51) 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC tires for Kleiner mules #1 & #6 789.20 01 General Fund BRYANT IDEAS MAC Traffic Box Wraps Installed - Qty 5 3,095.00 01 General Fund BRYANT IDEAS MAC Traffic Boxes Installed 10/23/17-10/24/17 2,319.75 01 General Fund BUILDING BLOCKS IDAHO instructor fee - We Do Robotics 9/21-10/19/17 - qty 8 352.00 01 General Fund CANYON TRUCK UPFITTERS fleet truck 16 backup alarm & ice melt truck parts - qty 4 132.08 01 General Fund CENTURYLINK Kleiner Park, Home Court, PD DSL, Centrex Phone Lines, 10/17 872.29 01 General Fund CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS CARD SERVICES #7898226373, Pay City Fuel - October 2017 13,632.51 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 1 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS CARD SERVICES #7898226399, Fuel for PD - October 2017 15,506.87 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY Dog Food & Pet Waste Bags - Qty 2 48.98 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY Dog Food for K9 Wyatt - Qty 2 Bags 80.98 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY ice melt tank parts - qty 15 69.55 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY ice melt tank parts for fleet truck - qty 5 17.45 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY repair part for 4-wheeler plow - qty 1 8.99 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY uniform clothing for W Maisey - qty 4 379.96 01 General Fund DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO Delta Dental, November 2017, #0133-0000 24,574.59 01 General Fund DENNIS DILLON AUTO PARK Left Back Pillar Trim for Unit # 43 44.98 01 General Fund DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS, INC.220/Test 545 feet of ground ladders 2,464.50 01 General Fund FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION steel for Lanark Park Shop future projects - qty 30 500.46 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY 12-foot ladder - qty 1 249.99 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY bolts for filter install at Tully Park - qty 40 25.03 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY carriage bolts & drill bit - qty 217 21.54 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY zip ties & sticky pads for City Hall lights - qty 400 40.20 01 General Fund FEDEX Finger Printing for Brock Cherry 183.85 01 General Fund FISHER'S TECHNOLOGY LF Maint & Support CO28-001 Meridian Police Department 1401 1,032.00 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY CO trash bags, cleaner, cloths - qty 28 753.20 01 General Fund GLASS DOCTOR 220/windshield repair MF037 359.03 01 General Fund H.R. DIRECT Employee Folders - 50 Count 308.13 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Plumbing filter 55.96 01 General Fund HSBC (COSTCO) BUSINESS SERVICE #7003-7319-1000-5018, Costco, October 2017 2,337.06 01 General Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business Cards for Christena Barney 39.95 01 General Fund IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY 18-0054, Animal Control Services - November 2017 31,761.00 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2200136188, Parks Power October 2017 11,479.68 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2203586629, Street Lights Power October 2017 26,744.61 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice & map for Rockbury Subdivision 256.71 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice - Linder Proffessional Plaza 42.18 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice Adoption of the International Building Code 46.62 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Public Hearing - Johnny Bronx 43.66 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Sole Source Bid on WRAP Restraint Systems, 60.72 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE Finger Printing October 2017 191.00 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION Sales Tax October 2017 942.87 01 General Fund INTERMOUNTAIN GAS 098-162-3000-8 Intermountain Gas October 2017 1,300.08 01 General Fund KATHY DRURY-BOGLE, PHR 17-0051, Employee Development Program - August 2017 2,000.00 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 2 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund KATHY DRURY-BOGLE, PHR 17-0051, Employee Development Program - September 2017 2,000.00 01 General Fund KRISTY SWINNEY Wellness Day October Chair Massages 228.00 01 General Fund LAURIE MCELROY instructor fee - Yoga 9/11-10/23/17 - qty 57 1,664.00 01 General Fund LAURIE MCELROY instructor fee - Yoga 9/5-10/21/17 - qty 19 556.00 01 General Fund LCA ARCHITECTS 17-0383, Courthouse Needs Assessment, 9/1/17-9/30/17 6,535.00 01 General Fund LOWE'S 220/Credit for tax charged on Inv. #09784 (1.65) 01 General Fund LOWE'S 220/wirenuts, wire strippers, bit for smoke alarms tool kits 29.09 01 General Fund LOWE'S Dewalt batteries for drills - qty 2 528.20 01 General Fund M.D. WILLIS, INC.Court Reporting for October Meetings 3,128.00 01 General Fund MARK NIEMEYER Reimburse, M. Niemeyer, 4 Uniform Pants & 1 Pair Shoes 230.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC City#8, #0786, 10/31/17 Statement -1,050.09 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC City#8, #0786, 9/29/17 Statement -(150.00) 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Com-Dev, #0851, 9/29/17 Statement -(382.50) 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks #3 9/27/17 Statement -51.96 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks#1, #0844, 10/31/17 Statement -272.14 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks#2, #0828, 10/31/17 Statement -158.72 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks#3, #0836, 10/31/17 Statement -3.84 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Clerks, #0521, 10/31/17 Statement 393.71 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Com-Dev, #0851, 10/31/17 Statement 1,353.15 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#2, #0745, 10/31/17 Statement -3,467.56 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#3, #0752, 10/31/17 Mastercard -933.08 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#4, #0760, 10/31/17 Statement -3,186.14 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#5, #0869, 10/31/17 Statement 622.97 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay HR, #0539, 10/31/17 Statement 2,309.67 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay IT#11, #0570, 10/31/17 Statement 1,571.85 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Mayor#2, #0711, 10/31/17 Statement -171.81 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Mayor#3, #0729, 10/31/17 Statement -496.79 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#1, #0604, 10/31/17 Statement 645.09 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#2, #0612, 10/31/17 Statement 6,911.37 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#3, #0620, 10/31/17 Statement 995.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#4, #0638, 10/31/17 Statement 1,954.89 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#5, #0646, 10/31/17 Statement 3,950.84 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#6, #0653, 10/31/17 Statement 4,420.15 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#7, #0661, 10/31/17 Statement 1,141.33 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#8, #0679, 10/31/17 Statement 5,813.66 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC PW #2 10/31/17 Statement -3.84 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 3 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund MERIDIAN VETERINARY CLINIC Exam, Blood Work, Meds for Wyatt, 10/19/17 232.30 01 General Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS ice melt tank setup fittings for truck 18 & 22 - qty 4 28.17 01 General Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS ice melt tank setup fittings for trucks 18 & 22 - qty 28 72.84 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee - Tumble & Twist/Flip 9/6-10/20/17 - qty 42 1,300.00 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee-Cheer,Ballet,Jazz,Capoeira,Tap 10/2-10/27/17 1,944.00 01 General Fund MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SVCS 220/SCBA repair 466.00 01 General Fund NAMPA-MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DIST NMID FY18 Irrigation - 98 Assesments (see attached document) 42,355.97 01 General Fund NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS NCPERS Group Life Insurance November 2017 688.00 01 General Fund NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY New York Life Insurance - November 2017 803.31 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.clip board, sharpie markers for Santa letters - qty 4 13.19 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.clipboards - qty 1 pkg 12.99 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Durable Labels and Mechanical Pencils 75.97 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.envelopes, clipboards, envelopes for Santa letters - qty 6 48.21 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Holders, clipboard, folders, label maker and labels - qty 7 26.17 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.laminating film for Winter Lights Parade - qty 2 pkgs 29.52 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Office Supplies 38.07 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Office Supplies - Paper, CPY 8.5x11 40.88 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Paper and AAA Batteries 69.64 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.sharpie marker - qty 1 2.07 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.sharpie markers & tape for Christmas festivities - qty 5 31.21 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Staples, pens, pads, post its, binders, mechanical pencils 91.54 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Clip on Chair Bottom Protectors - Qty 12 73.92 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER diesel fuel for air compressor 64.37 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER diesel fuel for transfer tank 26 193.41 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER emissions test for fleet truck 23 15.00 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER Fuel for City Hall Pool Car, Lic# C18641 34.88 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER premium unleaded fuel for fleet truck 13 52.26 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER premium unleaded fuel for fleet truck 14 95.15 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER super unleaded fuel-fleet truck 5; air compressor diesel 63.69 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel & emissions test for fleet truck 23 70.30 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for equipment 13.41 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 11 57.89 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 15; diesel for transfer tank 300.18 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 31 42.30 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 4 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 4 40.00 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 4; diesel for equipment 74.00 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 6 71.69 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 8 56.74 01 General Fund PRIMEPAY, LLC.Cobra Monthly Fee - October 2017 - PO 18-0095 291.75 01 General Fund PRIMEPAY, LLC.FSA Debit Card Fee - October 2017 - PO 18-0095 859.50 01 General Fund QUALITY TRAILER SALES 2018 UT7X16-5TA utility box trailer SN: 4JUBU1629JN051134 4,200.00 01 General Fund RECREATION TODAY OF IDAHO Installation of Bicycle Rack PD Admin Bldg 125.00 01 General Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT POSTAGE USE, October 2017 1,513.72 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC Lease: $260.53 Copies:$270.05 530.58 01 General Fund SALT LAKE WHOLESALE SPORTS Ammunition for Firearms - Qty 12 4,053.20 01 General Fund SHANNON LIND instructor fee - Gentle Movement Stretch 10/4-10/25/17 x 9 201.60 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC.Shredding for PD Oct. 2017 179.09 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0033, Monthly alarm monitoring, Dec. 2017 466.74 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0034, Quarterly Extinguisher Test & Inspect - Oct 2017 298.02 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0034, Quarterly Sprinkler Test & Inspection Oct 2017 158.83 01 General Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL Fire extinguisher qty 8 annual inspection 10/25/17 420.00 01 General Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY striping paint for Storey Park parking lots - qty 84 350.76 01 General Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY supplies & striping paint for Storey Park parking lot x 20 288.54 01 General Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC ice melt tank plugs for trucks 16 & 22 - qty 4 7.96 01 General Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC ice melt tank setup fittings for trucks 16 & 22 - qty 37 58.25 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF018, repair A/C officer side, front intake switch brok 848.69 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF019, repair inaccurate foam level gauge 1,484.70 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF021 install new thermal imaging camera 260.10 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF023 remove excess electronics & Alignment 723.10 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF027, repair MDT antenna losing signal 433.50 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF037, repair pump panel lights, & DEF leak 499.04 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF039, repair power to cradle point & tablet 173.40 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 5 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF041, repair headlight, Install camera, service generat 308.94 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/Prev Mtnc MF014 208.26 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/Prev Mtnc MF018 203.18 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/Prev Mtnc MF019 255.04 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/Prev Mtnc MF023 163.43 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/Prev Mtnc MF037 166.62 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 220/center punch tool 6.99 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 220/Pens, Paper, mouse pad - qty 3 25.02 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON MPR staff Christmas gifts - qty 2 19.88 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)credit on account (4.50) 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)hedge trimmer parts - qty 24 12.60 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)jumping jack compactor rental for Tully Park 10/20/17 79.00 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)ladder rentals for City Hall Christmas lights 10/19-10/25/17 184.00 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)propane for Parks Shop forklift 23.62 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)sharpen hedge trimmers for Kleiner Park - qty 2 60.00 01 General Fund THE KENERSON GROUP TreeWorks maintenance 10/29/17-10/28/18 800.00 01 General Fund THUNDER MOUNTAIN TENT & CANVAS 220/Replace knees & Buckle - turnouts 165.00 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR 2nd Set of Lieutenant Bars for Brown & Stokes 11.00 01 General Fund UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 18-0015, UPRR - South Parking Lot Lease FY18 - November 2017 1,743.41 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001, November 2017 Premiums 13,232.36 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE United Heritage, Voluntary Insurance, November 2017 4,282.95 01 General Fund VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 17-0126, Janitorial Service August 2017 14,861.88 01 General Fund VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 18-0013, Janitorial services October 2017 16,110.74 01 General Fund VISION SERVICE PLAN 30 044489 0001, VSP November 2017 4,877.53 01 General Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 220/2 Debris bags, Fold-A-Tank 328.20 01 General Fund WILLAMETTE DENTAL OF IDAHO, INC Willamette Dental Insurance November 2017 5,716.35 01 General Fund ZONES Double Cell/LTE connecting via SMA Double WiFi Connecting vi 1,074.00 Total 01 General Fund 988,134.45 07 Impact Fund BONNEVILLE BLUE PRINT SUPPLY plan copies for Lemp/Larkwood Path & SMRP - qty 846 140.40 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 6 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 07 Impact Fund D & B SUPPLY hoses for Reta Huskey Park - qty 2 59.98 07 Impact Fund FASTENAL COMPANY anchors & washers for Keith Bird Legacy Park - qty 141 62.37 07 Impact Fund FASTENAL COMPANY anchors & washers for Keith Bird Legacy Park - qty 75 35.92 07 Impact Fund GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY CO mop handles for Hillsdale, RHuskey, KBird Legacy - qty 5 110.05 07 Impact Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks#3, #0836, 10/31/17 Statement -137.70 07 Impact Fund PROBUILD concrete for setting trash receptacles at K Bird Legacy x 14 62.86 Total 07 Impact Fund 609.28 20 Grant Fund governmental SOLUTIONS TO GO Tape & Boxes for MADC Prescription Drug Collection - Qty 52 119.25 Total 20 Grant Fund governmental 119.25 60 Enterprise Fund ADAM JENNINGS Expense Report, A. Jennings, PNCWA Conference, Vancouver WA, 145.18 60 Enterprise Fund ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC 16-0260,17-0386,SCADA upgrades,service as of 10/25/17 8,051.00 60 Enterprise Fund AFLAC T5581, November 2017, AFLAC 205.39 60 Enterprise Fund ALL AMERICAN INSURANCE ACHD Bond renewal 2-year premium - 11/13/17-11/13/19 438.00 60 Enterprise Fund AMERICAN TRAILER SALES CO.2017 Big Tex Beavertail Trailer, Vin# 072092 4,250.00 60 Enterprise Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 18-0090, Bills 10/20/17, Delinquent Notices 10/23/17, Insert 11,784.82 60 Enterprise Fund BLUE CROSS OF IDAHO November 2017 Blue Cross Insurance 108,960.87 60 Enterprise Fund BOISE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC Refund, 4601010801, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1618 E Fathom St, Custome 113.24 60 Enterprise Fund BPA HEALTH, INC.EAP, Nov 2017, 450 Employees 389.34 60 Enterprise Fund CARRIER CORP Labor & supplies to repair controller in Lab bldg chiller 1,426.36 60 Enterprise Fund CENTURYLINK Kleiner Park, Home Court, PD DSL, Centrex Phone Lines, 10/17 652.59 60 Enterprise Fund COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Parts to add HOA switches to the panels of Autumn Faire, 3,424.32 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP Mega lugs for valves for RAS line 213.28 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Boots, mucks, gloves, t-shirts, hat, high vis sweatshirt 598.87 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Pony Shovel Qty 1 49.99 60 Enterprise Fund DAVID MILES Reimburse, D. Miles, Safety Boots 150.00 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 7 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund DC FROST ASSOCIATES, INC 18-0056 Ballast kit for UV 1,498.14 60 Enterprise Fund DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO Delta Dental, November 2017, #0133-0000 6,679.91 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Threaded rod 5.12 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Tool box to bolt to CCTV Van 2 C19267 223.63 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Coupler to repair discharge boot at centrifuge 2, dewatering 17.41 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Plumbing parts for Collections bldg 347.46 60 Enterprise Fund GRAMERCY, LLC Refund, Surety-2015-0013, Gramercy Heights Sub #1, Release o 8,063.00 60 Enterprise Fund GRANT MECHANICAL, INC Labor & parts to repair HVAC in Digester 4 & 5 bldg 148.44 60 Enterprise Fund GRANT MECHANICAL, INC Labor to repair HVAC 2, Operations control bldg 127.50 60 Enterprise Fund GREGORY & LEILA MCNEILL Refund, 2505028404, Wat/Sew/Trash, 4105 W Big Creek Dr, Cust 117.86 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Composite sampler controller pump 3,192.27 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Parts to install new water line to Lab grounds irrigation 1.11 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Sandpaper 31.88 60 Enterprise Fund HSBC (COSTCO) BUSINESS SERVICE #7003-7319-1000-5018, Costco, October 2017 464.34 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business cards for Brad Standley and Dave Heaton 92.50 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2202131047, WWTP Power - October 2017 44,554.62 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2204228288, Water Power October 2017 33,692.82 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2205167097 WWTP Power - Liftstations - October 2017 3,270.95 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION Sales Tax October 2017 5,166.28 60 Enterprise Fund INTERMOUNTAIN GAS 098-162-3000-8 Intermountain Gas October 2017 1,481.69 60 Enterprise Fund INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 12V batteries for card readers on UV disinfection bldg 40.00 60 Enterprise Fund INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER Replacement batteries for CCTV Van 1 C16415 248.74 60 Enterprise Fund IRMINGER CONSTRUCTION 17-0339,Well 30 Construction,PayApp 4, 9/21-10/20/17 168,649.73 60 Enterprise Fund MASTER EXCAVATION, INC.Labor to repair sewer main from manhole J8-112 to 3,860.00 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC City#2, #0588, 10/31/17 Statement -46.00 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC City#6, #0810, 10/31/17 Statement -756.94 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC City#7, #0778, 10/31/17 Statement -654.06 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC City#9, #0794, 10/31/17 Statement -565.53 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Water, #0547, 10/31/17 Statement 410.96 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay WW, #0596, 10/31/17 Statement 1,053.99 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC PW #1 10/31/17 Statement -2,315.86 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC PW #2 10/31/17 Statement -1,263.08 60 Enterprise Fund MATERIALS TESTING & INSPECTION Collection Equipment Facility, Services 9/18/17-10/1/17 352.40 60 Enterprise Fund MATERIALS TESTING & INSPECTION Collections Equipment Facility, services 8/21/17-9/3/17 692.20 60 Enterprise Fund MERIDIAN MEDICAL PLAZA LLC Release of Deposit, Franklin/Touchmark/FiveMile Project#0742 4,600.00 60 Enterprise Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Compressor air fittings 109.33 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 8 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Grease gun parts to modify gun for use on other projects 41.07 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Chain for bobcat 152.38 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Door stops for conference room doors on 1st floor Admin bldg 10.52 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Forged lever load binders for bobcat 96.12 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Fuses for stock 17.00 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Heaters for Collections bldg 2,082.64 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Misc bolts for stock 449.14 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Motor heater for stock & replacement heaters for teritary 143.52 60 Enterprise Fund NAMPA-MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DIST NMID FY18 Irrigation - 98 Assesments (see attached document) 6,384.89 60 Enterprise Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS Oil filter for 2006 Kawasaki mule 2.49 60 Enterprise Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS WD-40 lubricant & oil filter 32.91 60 Enterprise Fund NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS NCPERS Group Life Insurance November 2017 128.00 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Cylinder rental for Oct 2017 - qty 8 61.44 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Hi-Vis jacket for Orion Valentine 58.12 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Long sleeve hi-vis shirts for Orion Valentine 104.16 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Plastic Funnel & Fuel Stabilizer - Qty 2 13.98 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Quick links for break away chains for generator trailer unit 4.99 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.2 clocks 22.58 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.4 notebooks 21.88 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Holders, clipboard, folders, label maker and labels - qty 7 130.32 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Tape dispenser, stapler, pencil cup, organizer, trays -qty10 74.01 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN File Hanger, Blue Gel Pens Qty 4 70.69 60 Enterprise Fund REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.Republic Trash Services Contract October 2017 1,047,282.74 60 Enterprise Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT POSTAGE USE, October 2017 258.60 60 Enterprise Fund RICOH USA, INC C86101407 PW copier lease Nov 2017, copies Oct 207 376.66 60 Enterprise Fund RICOH USA, INC C86101421 Envir copier lease, Nov. 2017, copies Oct 2017 325.77 60 Enterprise Fund SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION CO INC 17-0332,Water Main Ext.,E Lake Hazel/S Locust Grove,10/25/17 232,703.09 60 Enterprise Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL 18-0033, Monthly alarm monitoring, Dec. 2017 105.95 60 Enterprise Fund SKILLPATH SEMINARS Registration, T. Converse, Developing Emotional IQ Seminar, 111.75 60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC Parts to repair the discharge boot at centrifuge 2,228.27 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 9 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund SUNROC CORPORATION 17-0324, 17-0393, 18-0028, Simplot RV Pad Relocation - Final 10,880.19 60 Enterprise Fund TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA 18-0112, UV Expansion Project - Retainage Release 11,900.35 60 Enterprise Fund ULTRA TOUCH CAR WASH Interior cleaning of Inspectors vehicle 98.95 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001, November 2017 Premiums 3,668.05 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE United Heritage, Voluntary Insurance, November 2017 692.89 60 Enterprise Fund VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 17-0126, Janitorial Service August 2017 1,665.21 60 Enterprise Fund VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 18-0013, Janitorial services October 2017 1,715.17 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 272508216-00001 Water/WW Modems FY2018 - 9/24/17-10/23/17 14.73 60 Enterprise Fund VIKING INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS Parts washer powder 130.00 60 Enterprise Fund VISION SERVICE PLAN 30 044489 0001, VSP November 2017 1,442.81 60 Enterprise Fund VWR INTERNATIONAL LLC.Bottle top acid dispenser 345.24 60 Enterprise Fund WESTERN STATES AUTOMATION, LLC Labor & parts to repair valve on actuator, influent to tank 667.55 60 Enterprise Fund WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO Labor & parts to perform 500hr service on front end loader 761.23 60 Enterprise Fund WILLAMETTE DENTAL OF IDAHO, INC Willamette Dental Insurance November 2017 2,237.15 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Hose clamp 1 3/4 in to 2 3/4 in 35.88 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Hose clamp 1/2 in to 1 1/4 in 8.38 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 1,763,408.46 Report Total 2,752,271.44 Date: 11/9/17 10:56:09 AM Page: 10 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Public Safety Annual Report - Police and Fire Departments MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS mow". FZTM 1 106L i�•� 1-4 pr is ,�� ::� �. -R,• - ,� _ V a'' � ' � f - Education & Prevention Annual Report -,*%N j, —Vif k �� t w vOLICF ME 10 -t. 1903 Meridian Police Introduction Education & Prevention Annual Report - 2016/17 The Meridian Police Department's (MPD) Community Education and Prevention Report covers events provided during August 1, 2016 to July 31, 2017. Our goal is to provide a variety of sustainable educational opportunities and prevention efforts throughout our community and within the schools. These efforts will strengthen and foster relationships through education and communication supporting the city's vision of creating a community where people can safely live, work and raise a family. The MPD Units offering these educational opportunities and prevention efforts include School Resource Officers, the Crime Prevention Unit, The Meridians Anti -Drug Coalition (MADC) and other community and youth organizations. All together a total of 776 educational opportunities and prevention effort events reached 68,270 community members spanning a variety of different topics, locations in the City of Meridian. and age groups. The top events strengthening our community include Lockdown Training, Internet Safety courses, School Visits, Special Events, and Community Presentations. An overview of each unit's expertise is opportunities and prevention efforts provided throughout this year. School Resource Officers (SRO) The officers of the SRO unit provide la` enforcement services at designated campuses throughout the West Ada Sch District to also include charter and privE educational institutions. The SROs focu their efforts on providing the highest quality of service, in partnership with the community, to preserve and protect life and property through education, prevention and enforcement. The "Highlighted Events".taught by the SRO unit are areas of concern or areas of focus based off of current trends involving youth in and around their school(s). A total of 586 educational opportunities and prevention effort events were hosted by SROs reaching 20,084 community members of all ages from seniors to preschool. The highlighted events strengthening our community by the SROs include Lockdown Training, Internet Safety, Sexting/Pomography, Alcohol Education, Author(s) -MPD: Erickson, Galbreaith, Harper, Nagy SRO's HIGHLIGHTED EVENTS/TRAININGS Lockdown Training 117 Internet Safety 115 Sexting/Pornography 23 Alcohol Education 22 Drug Education = 18 Life Skills Training = 17 I I Page Education & Prevention Annual Report - 2016/17 Drug Education, and Life Skills Training. In addition, the SROs work closely with the Meridian Police Department Patrol Division, Investigative Division and Community/Outreach Groups sharing information and handling juvenile related issues and trends in our community with the ultimate goal of making a difference for the betterment of the community while building positive relationships. Crime Prevention Unit The Crime Prevention Unit's mission is to develop, implement, and administer community based crime prevention programs designed to reduce the fear of crime, reduce criminal activity, increase safety and reduce the likelihood of crime victimization. A total of 134 educational opportunities and prevention effort events were hosted by Crime Prevention reaching 20,367 community members of all ages from The Crime Prevention Unit proactively engages and interconnects current and relevant crime prevention information to businesses and community members of all ages to strengthen and foster MPD's relationships. As noted in the chart, the top events/trainings include Community Block Party, National Night Out, Trunk or Treat, Spring Safety Flings, Mayor's Youth Advisory Council. Additionally, to recognize and appraise the crime risks within the City of Meridian, one of the Crime Prevention Units objectives is to tailor the City of Meridian's Crime Prevention efforts based on current crime statistics, local needs, and TOP EVENTS/TRAININGS (based on population) Community Block Party 6,000 National Night Out0885 4,000 Trunk or Treat3,000 Spring Safety Flings2,646 Mayor's Youth Advisory Council conditions. This is accomplished through community partnerships utilizing supporting programs such as Idaho Crime Prevention Association, National Crime Prevention Institute, Crime Stoppers, and Organized Retail Crime Association of Idaho. Moreover, the Crime Prevention Unit strives to provide prevention resources and strategies to the citizens of Meridian through Neighborhood Watch Meetings and the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council to ensure that Meridian is a safe place to work, live, and raise a family. 21 Page Author(s) -MPD: Erickson, Galbreaith, Harper, Nagy Education & Prevention Annual Report - 2016/17 The Meridians Anti -Drug Coalition The Meridian Anti -Drug Coalition's mission is to strengthen our community through substance abuse prevention. Coalition members and partners continually work to provide current prevention education and support, while building Meridian into a drug free community, where people can safely live, work and raise a family. During this period a total of 51 drug education and prevention events/trainings reached 26,209 community members. Because successful prevention starts in early childhood and spans our entire life, MADC selects strategies to reach youth in elementary school, senior citizens and everyone in between. During this period, 20,064 (or 76.5%) of community members reached were from all ages, 1,693 (or 6.5%) were adults and 4,452 (or 17.0%) were within the High School, Middle School.or Elementary School ages. One of the ways MADC works to achieve community level change is through our partnerships. Representatives from 12 different sectors help us identify existing events that draw large amounts of community members where we can present prevention information. This is what makes it possible for our message to reach 26,209 community members, in one year, at 51 events/tramings. Based on the number of attendees, MADC's top events/trainings included The Cabin Fever Reliever, Community Presentations, The Community Block Party, Spring Safety Flings and Breathalyzer Events. MADC's prevention goals include educating community TOP EVENTS/TRAININGS (based on population) Cabin Fever Reliever 7,500 Community Presentation 6,337 Community Block Party 6,000 Spring Safety Flings 2,647 Breathalyzer Event 1,000 members about the risks associated with drug use, with a special emphasis on youth and the middle school population. We help our community members decipher fact from fiction, especially as it relates to marijuana, and provide additional resources, tools and referrals to drug education and treatment services. To ensure any prevention gaps are filled and programs fit the specific needs of our community, MADC is in a continual process of evaluation. 31 Page Author(s) -MPD: Erickson, Galbreaith, Harper, Nagy VLIcF r MERIDIAN em wm Conclusion Education & Prevention Annual Report - 2016/17 This year, MPD hosted a total of 776 educational opportunities and prevention events reaching 68,270 community members spanning a variety of locations throughout the City of Meridian, various groups from seniors down to daycare and preschool ages. The top events/trainings strengthening our community included Lockdown Training, Internet Safety courses, School Visits, Special Events, and Community Presentations. Through hard work, dedication and determination, the Meridians Police Department's School Resource Officers, Crime Prevention Unit and The Meridian Anti -Drug Coalition helped educate numerous families and their children. These programs continue to provide on-going educational opportunities and prevention efforts within our community. 41 Page Author(s) -MPD: Erickson, Galbreaith, Harper, Nagy ui -o C: C: a) U O A) 40 C O N > O O + +-,O C f0 ra U 7 y +� L v E o v a) L tr- E a m o o L -0 4- O U a) 1� O > u r N > E w u 0 E r s E 'U a) U C O ()> L m u Qa) , 7 CL N Q) U ,w W O L 4—, L +1 tD a) O V1 W M r -I E o > �i oo O aD M o t N > 0 -0vU, ri � d cn f G E vi u O N 3 4- = 3 . E c c Eo j Oo> co u U W Q c o , .Z a) v u N CM aJ 4- 00 > to N O aha=t0 C) u ai N v U u 4- Q ate-+ m O O mai 0 E >- �m (13 L :L' Z � N (u -S o O o C E +_ � > 3 E +' C -0O O v W >O Y U a) W m u v 3 W Q. •� U +� `o "-0�-0 a = d fu , aj OZi°'3=oma 4- L Z v 3 O o ai � c 4� Q Qa) m ac o a, > o a a) C: :3 .0 -r- 2 o o E n u O O bo y CO ++ d � M+t+ -a u O Ci vi O m vi O i Y v i y O O O > �ovo� N > N Co O U Q F C vi > (1) {A 4al CI > D U C N a) ro L : C G 4, N O O O C tw 'C ■ D Z N a rl Q N a g =Y� Z Q u u 0 7 a n7' Z 00 � u N Xd ao o 0 0 o o o C duan] }o jaq wn N r i ki u r LO Co m n A O C-4 O Q L C) m u LA o� � tLi m — o Z rn n L J 00 N J a, 0 u O zCx N Q z` �� LL o C i N > > LLJ Q Z... n C v oc v C Cu u 3 a '•m=om a O C O +J e -I N C O N = Q W � E (u n O W c n N O C-4 O Q L C) m u o� � tLi m rn n f'J 00 E a, 0 u O zCx N Q z` �� N o C i N > > LLJ Z... n ~ v oc v C Cu Z= 3 a '•m=om a O C O +J e -I N C O N = Q Ov E (u n O C 0 c w C Z O 0 ■ z c z L O y Lr) V) w00 C Z Ly -ua WL d U o m Lai o Q N Ln w Nto t �D m d 4 n N C-4 Q L o� � tLi m p� rn n f'J 00 N 0 O zCx z` �� N o 0> �+ N i N > > LLJ Z... n ~ v oc v C Cu Z= 3 a '•m=om a V) L O +J N 0- Q Ov Cc n O C 0 u Co 0 O C-4 Q L � tLi m p� f'J 0 O zCx �QC 01 a� O a0i > E Z... n W LL � E ti ..tn C �v '•m=om d E. O ILn LA uo •CZ U � b.0 Q C C O v :O va- 4. (LO J N ri C U +- -a bio NC co N O 41 M —_ `.•� 4- C f0 M "a O >O 14-'a a a--• L 75 T L" D u -+ 4- W -a v pw L co � tin -a lO > U L C ocO �O C: 0 cn N b.0 —j C a ri C n a O v L LA M 41 3 C to O v .0 CL U � L �' -a 3 O W W � Q -0 C co O U t O O a C+� u s cc E o a T O oQ O m co Ln L V1 E c`o O O c0 L O ai 11 o L Z +, M a v o c -a Sao _O p 7W C O N m + > Z O' O v ++ a Ln — to U u s 4T W v 41 •= a +' 0 Ozi aCit� as > m L : Z a m C a 0 4- O o > H c aCi bO +' Q a > a .0 a U > a +' C QJ I s f6 3 L tw � s s W C pip hrD C N v s s O L _ tw � W t H u a U °i Jo a 3 L ~ �i LL Q 0 O C O fl- C- .0 v a W O O vUi •� v O V 0 L W O O W 4- 4.1V) +� V) c O c � O Ln a W v0 T u w (O m -Q O J � a 0 O,� L C C C O0 w .5 a, UO O E �, O -a U -C bm O F- a a > M w00 , '� a 0 a N � C � (L9 a ov, ap H a - a-+ "a C in LL O 41 V) N N - Q 00 -a a --o cc r, Q ■ Q .-I E _ in - v O LL C - - U- 0 Z z u LU Q O w o p z Z LO m c LU C� G POn Z j LU w o LD 0 F- O _` O o Z O N N o 2 c n. p � v"•. U a LL O v c: 0 � s m °D a Z = s;uan310jagwnN O L �0 }� 0 w O L U a u O O t � a "G V z z Z 00 I— W Q W _> LL r O a W U +' Q N W > E Qj s LA a � � Q n LO H V1 Q z Q W N N LU 1 0 W _ ,J = c+' E Hcu v Ln C a O O u -a W O uOD 6 W C •` F =O O Y O cu c CL to C Y s a ux N J V1 N N r*% � O � � m � � 0 � � O r4 � k w � « D it « O m m Ln Q 2 7 .2 \/ 0 \ z\/] 0 7 y #y6\ \ \ \ \ \ % / ± ®+1 \ 3 / m bio /U co t / \ / \ ƒ 2 \ 0 / o 2 2 0 \ \ \ f {%$§ E2/ ± ( M \ \mak\ c \ ( 7 \ \ C: � o -0 g / 6 E .2 / \ � E � @ 4' E \ § $ / { \ / ƒ $ z m > / § 0 $ _ V) _ % l2�2 '\ 5 § E \ �z a 4r,2 3 § 0 0 $/=3 k E = k 0 bn \ / E o \ 41 u m m E / \x / 0_$7 R n & _ % / D 0 0 0 � \ $: \ CL � \ aj t \ \ \ 7 % 2 o / $ > � N z 0 ■ �_ ..\_ � 6 o $ UL § m � ? � � - ± | < < i Q w . 0 i \] o o R � � \ ■ i � 3 @ ■_: . / o o o o o 0 0 Q r4 0 00 tD g fq &u� m]@ ggmnm B � � � � *N .r % » w LL 0 U E k Q LW kD k 4 0 « j } a \ / / \ / < Ln \ � ti, $ V)cukf L- Q: -r— \ 2 / / / / ! \ \ Z} § / ƒ / - � k LLj ° L� _ 3 £ * \ ' w - 3 LLJ / 5 E \ M / Ln $ m e ƒ p c c } I C a N O a i a+f0 Q1 a� (O > >. 0--s v a•' O c v v ro N U"O C: a) - a u 1 41 4 o �r-M4, M > c C Q w O v U) N•• L O N E aj E O C caj v c C -:5 a E O , U Oai F- O U (nIn ^ CO -0 C -0 M !+ O Q _ ..0 N -3 vC O >-- v U, a L v > o aJ ±2 co �a Z� E ai ,£ E coo CO 2 U U CO � � S C C > ,� �. _r� 0 N 0 � •OAU � vi N }N L L bD o Q m 4-1 'A t '' m > °1-0 a Q m aj O 0 O7 L N o 0 Y ai : O QL L O F- M Q M 4- U en 2 n v O L Q M � 4- ro i O (0C o C �'' c0 O 41 OU ra a1 0 L (O QJ L z a-+ C7 t 0 O>, v a to O U L c L a m t 431 41 O >, � > c o 2 v a" -E L a o � v ai E o E m t N 0 U O — Z U (U v 41 U i a) L Q U aL, � ° F°- .E 3 - J CD LS v n � z D C) V O Q 1-0 Q y D = 4 Cc o` N -- 0 •, ani .0 a� - 00 E 0 D a) Q 0 L w o cu z 0 U 1) ;--3 Z o ro �_ ~ O c 0 L —5 G o U .NC d� rl O E � cn P 4 0 ra F-- W S L c u 0 z Ln Lf) -0 0 a z j N u [n J . f U 41 QC [`\+ O d0 o > > ` to • fV ,� > O O w z 0 w o 4- N X, z U. ni a m LL, Ln Om0 ■ w V Lai O a to m a I� m N N H N u1 D w a fn a I Q 'Q E` sjua ] jo jagwnN CD CD CD LS v Q cn C) V O Q 1-0 Q 0 D = O Cc o` 0 •, 0 .0 00 E 0 D a) Q 0 L w o z 0 U CD CD CD LS Q cn C) V O Q 1-0 D CTS .0 00 00 cz 0 Y c ;--3 Z o ro �_ Z O l- L G .NC .l, O Qo m ra F-- o ro L c Ln N � O C'4 � m � 5 0 tD � O r4 � k m 0 a , � e 2 \ / \)LL/ ) _ \ � k \ E 2 \ E 2 a) ,u k/ \ _ g 2 k \ \ > $ 0 CL / \ ) \ cu E \ / 2 n / 2 \ fr 2 •w ( \ \ o \ } « e m �s= >5\ _ > m } / /UO k LL 41 > �/ M / / 03� (D U /2 41/ / ± / _ 0- to 0- / nuts \ / § § $o E _ 0C: U / / u ) % / \ \ //ate � 2 ) / f \ ® 3<. \ 2 % § tw 2:6 E § u \0 c 2 > u / N ' > LL/ u E ■: � cu m (U L. ra i/ § -T N 0 00 Q 4 eq o 2 eee]r 2gmnN � LI) � \ \ C; / � � � � � � LLJ � LL LL O LLJze LL, � Q LLJ (Z cc a \ Q \ �¢ kz e � rf) / 67 - CD c \ $ � a k � < 0 CD LO m g > LL/ u F E E d o 7 ELn E U - � cu m (U L. ra � 'Q. Q. q cu co m 0 0 N Ou FA 00 N O CO U) r+ O Ock K O cl CD 0 16 O O O O O O= 3 CD p O o 0 o v o O 0 D O ClCD 00 _ n w O cD O Q) 70 C CD n— p O o N � CD v v _ ® v OVO o (D -%r�� c co-0 (D vCD vcn D < C C� o(D o n O D � CL CT 0 (n Q° r- r 3 n 0 70 � � o OIn 0 0 l< D >CD O �= v m (n a Q° 0 �< (D r+ Cl) Z3o C) O < � cn (D C) CL) Cf) Q- 70 7 — 0 (Oj O r- � v � _ Q (n' r+ C) L u ;o cl a w rn O (D' cn I s ® A k< IDr+ 0 0 O 0 � 0 n D O "% o Cl) wo -� � (Do v (' (D-� -0o M v O � �- rn v U, o cn 0 rn 0 v c (n 0 =T rn (n 0 o < ui' N• v — rn t) 3 0 0 rn 0 --, cn < CD O --1 �' Q cn O w Q O C— CD < (n O. L u ;o cl a w rn O (D' cn I —� CD W :3 O E -0 ccn U Z cn � ZT (D 70Z37 Q �' v rn Cf)(D � OL) r+ � O -h () (n rn cD � r+ O o rn 0 cD 70 v Q. v Z3 c N v (Do 0- O C) o D r+ M r+ f C/) C37 O (Dv cn -0 (D 3 0- O rn v :5r-+ OL)- Q �-+ O 0 rn < � O ®c v v v cn O ---h Z3 0 o cn 07 70 v rn 7. � 3 ^ (D Z3 r-+cD :7�Zt N O Z3 �..L C CD m 0 � i _� - —F O Z3 S C u � v r CD -F =7 0 (D(D , V ) ,!^/ ,f :7D CD 73 CD 0 O CD 0 Z7 CD Z7 O cn v O n cZ 0 '09 C) r-+ cn 00 0 - 04 r- 0 0 (n r-+ -4 to 0 (D (D '09 C) -4 & -4 CD - 04 r—F (D 0 O'Q -4 to (D < (D m X w 3 cn 0 0 r-+ 0 0 Q. cn -4 & -4 CD - 04 -4 to -4 co -4 O co -4 (A Ili -L " K) W I A QK CAT --- Ft��, cio f F m �4 co- W M C i� 4�, :1 113 -T 04 r, "I—T 0) , j -4 00 (.0 J-4, "H. -j CD. TPN MILI %4 _crt—��V -4 rQ J --44 jrr�rl J, LINDER 00 (0 0 1 1-T T -4 oo-T-- .7 Ll ; 4 -4 Co I -4 P. co JIF -li 4�6z c:) -11 -4 -4 co R,ERIDIAN -4 00 (0 -4 w N) V, XV.: -4 OCUSTGI WE -4 0) 4 -4 co 4h, CID tIJ1`0 C LOVEO Al Coln TQ n O (D (D (D n sv 0 O (D rD O 3 iv O N v 2- n S O i- cy) Ql W (u � � N o CD O O (D 2 m 7v n 3 0(D rr • -a -< O N � O rD N Ln O (D A p 2 O ro m N x N N W N co O F` fD N v N rD 0 O m 70 n 3 fD r* r • -0 -< N 3 OO (DD N Ln O (D F` -+ V Q 2 O rD m N x. N N 3 O Dl Dq 7 O "a O 3 N SZ ((DD r Q- O N 7 (D N rD CL O v a- r°7r rD O (D 3r v 0 (D O O D) n (D 0 n 3- O O W A 0 s O 00 A D no n o v < O O O (D f -r e�-r -j pq B . r+ (nD v 0 CDD r : O O m rD n 3r n n p + --I S n, O (D : rD O n C (n LIL n C Vl u 3 O II :3 + d o O_ -I S O (D Dl r+ n N to a. CL 'O 'O 'ON (D C O p iv 6 V) � CL :3 O v -6 -0O _ _iv W rD (D rD r°D O iv r0r v rD - O Q - - N � O O O< lD O N ill r+ CD < S _ rt73 w 0- _O r+ Q O A n cnfD ((D ill - m —m77n = ID (n O 3 n N r Q O rD n w N rr N �.: 7;- o'- 0 O (Drt O O ; n O (D Q rD (D V Q O (D N rD rD rD v 3 O hv 2 X O t� lP N N N r -F O FQ F rN_'r. O Q t 3 n rt O v -c3(D 7 On 2 L _O rt O O O- (D a D- 3 m N N (D N X r{ 'O X ? 3 — (D rU N rD 3 — (D N � � N Ln A N N y- v n n v rD CD O O (D°t (D f -r e�-r -j pq o D VOi (D Ir-' : n O 3 fD m o n --j (D + (D n O o p v A' ni n C Vl rt Q 3 O II + d !1 -i S O : O (D N h 3 W v CL a. CL 'O 'O N (D C O : rD V) a. :3 (D s O v -6 n � u, 0 _ W rD — m r°D O iv r0r v rD n D- + 3 N - rD 3 � O O O< ((D N ill r+ CD N(DD S rt73 w 0- O_ 7 , M O A n cnfD p - m �v n = X (n O N X (n 7 'O rD Nct S w N n n: o m N n S F' O (D r+ rD O O V Q O (D N rD rD rD n - O ffl 2 O o t� lP m x - W FQ F rN_'r. O Q t m 3 t: v 7 On h �•; _O 3 a ((DD v a V rD N N m : 'O X ? (D rU N rD 3 — N N N cn (D DE 3 � < O CD 3 N (D f -r e�-r -j Dl rD o rD n M Q nl c m G D 3 fD rj o —� o u 3 O O v, - rD 0- ni O ti rt Q O O rt O NW °1+ Q d O r+ Ell O _G N S D rD n �. rD rt n a. :3 (D s O v n � u, 0 2 < OA — m �V n O iv r0r - m �a n c 3 rD + 3 N (D 3 (Z N 3 � O O rD r (D ill ((D N ill r+ ( N(DD cOi� O O_ 7 , M O A 703 O p 3 (D SS (D = X (n O N X (n 7 'O rD Nct S pq N n D 3 o tv D < o a. n + + rD rD O O L� VI N N N rD rD rD n - O ffl Q� Vl t� lP r+ O O w A W FQ F Lq In Q m O DE = g:D CD 70 rt N O� fl v O sv s O N 3 II 3 ° rj o —� 3 D) r+ S rr t O O v, - rD 0- :E rt O N S N O -h (D Q °1+ O O < Zr -v-h O N =il (D n �. rD rtCD n ? r+C:O -n. (D (1 Ln 2 < QU O pl rt — m �V n C rD 3 rt -(OD 3 O y .G O 0 (D W ((D N �• N N CL wO V SZ _O C O D p > (D s (D O- (D 2 it w X 'a rD X (n O N N SU rD uq � 3 -o O G o � Q nD cn � rN+ + (D N CL O O L� VI N N V ' (D (D n — (D 0- O L17 N t� lP r+ O O � � O rD O' In Q Ln 0 M A n V V W W — 3 N N < 'o 0 � � 0 o W m c n J °-' w o 3 o o. � Q a a a (D fD O p 3 w a J m m io o_ Q � 2 ? 0 J a c m o vxmi � N J 0 0 oJ~u' o m - x a a m N z m - m 0 m a J 6 S o o � o 3 'o a � o. o0 0 0 3 x x a a 0 x o 0 G a S S � fD fD fD c 3 3 3 a o m m o N o 0 n n: 0 0 .J+ n w < < lA lA � N N A N N N A N N N A A N N V V W V rn m N O• In in W N F W N N W N El Id OVi O V y O O C N d � G — 3 N 3'm' a J m a C w z ti - O u 0 7 N J ' o_ -a n i A n V V W W — 3 N N < 'o 0 � � 0 o W m c n J °-' w o 3 o o. � Q a a a (D fD O p 3 w a J m m io o_ Q � 2 ? 0 J a c m o vxmi � N J 0 0 oJ~u' o m - x a a m N z m - m 0 m a J 6 S o o � o 3 'o a � o. o0 0 0 3 x x a a 0 x o 0 G a S S � fD fD fD c 3 3 3 a o m m o N o 0 n n: 0 0 .J+ n w < < lA lA � N N A N N N A N N N A A N N V V W V rn m N O• In in W N F W N N W N El �o t[) LD y N J O m N po O r L M L Ln p m < a m < nni 6 vi 0 ° 00 C O OO. N j O W N j O N N fD O d O O O 3 9 3 m 3 a d n m 3 0 3 m 0 3 0 3 J a ~ N fD N N 2 m m m ro ro d m o a ° a ° w u O O O p a .a � m � ran m o o n m n 2 n m n °—' 0 3 0 o: ray x < x R x m ro m � a — n o o — m n '* on o — N n A c D o N 3 p a N 3 o, 3 m < o f _ 3 m m \V \V 11,• J N N n fD N O Jj X fD O X X 41 M w a w asp 27 0 tt 0 00 0 �. 0- a ' a n obi rn x 3 Cf) `V i A o V�^ N / V ` J ri' m 3 m 0 ran m m 0 J a D m -L X N?o O 0 O0 m mX ` X XO fl^ - R 3 m a a -o a s 0 o rn m o o ro o o ro rt YJJ liJ J- s c s c 0 ro m w ro ro m as o n ro ro 00 0Q 3 0 3 o o c ort rF o o ro ti o o ro — o o m O o o a o o d m o o n O I _ 0 0' h LVn'LvO rI i A N N F It N (� < o. < < �• 6 Q rn 6 Q d Q Q J < a 2 < 4 d 3 00 � J O O _ d Jm 90 90 f« � ou N F, N N F+ N i-+ i-+ N N N ~ N N N N N N ~ N to Vl l!r v v V m m 91in in A to H N 00 N N O V N to N lU � 0 o d z :3� � � c a C O O a d Q N o � 0. -o a au ao 00 In A N N p pp O w N V A A Ln W A N p - o � w 0 o av 0 0 0 _ ol � C C n C d S rao d � m a a a a a w v d -a J N n ' m o n o n m a m m ro n a - n 0 3 .`m. 3 0 0 0 d R 3 Q J 0 < 0 C a 3 a U0 = n z S O N N l rt d N > > J a 3 a J a — Q N O. 0 0 o 0 -1 -I D io -1 D 3 1 D .<J m o .J J o o J X X h N X X `� d (D X X `+ a - 3 m a a 3 a a 3 O O m X O O m 91 O O N s m S J C S S C � 0 J S S C tD fD � (D fD f0 O 3 3 3 3 3 o a 3 3 a aO � a a v a a d a � a a 0 0 m m 0 o ro ni o o m n ^ a n m ~ ct d m 2cl, FW i < < < < < < m a < v Q rt a v Q Q a 0 m J o. I < n A o V O1 A v N 'o 0 z m m z =4 n a G O 0 d N O d O Obh 91 in N w z o a ai � a a l A r F po Fa V O + W w o o m 0 m m O w o o<i O = O d O N 3 o d - 3 0 0 3 a O 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 n n m m a m d m ro 0 O O N d o O O' N D N d = 0 d w N � 030 O 0 � o3a x M — n n FF N o = o_ fD fl- Q (D = a v � o ,�, m o ro 3 -o fU fD — d 0 0 0 0 < -o_ 3 O O D X O O N 3 3 c 3 3 c 0 0 o N o o m d _. d O O - a a 2 < < < < fl - `I r N N r r N r � 90 90N N � N N N ~ N N N ~ N n ro .i o � � w o a m � � a N � Z C O O N a — 3 — � O � < d O' � � a 0 0 3 � a O O m (D d m � m 3 m < O 0' D 0. d O N N Q < d a Q m O � a a E3 tl0 � n w m e m d y � a N o . j O � v� D 3 H = D d d O 3 0 0 �f a D X X nO 3 (p a O N pp S a O S S C o o d ro ro. o d 3 c d v. 0 — o o 0 a O d O ro- n n m d � d 9 E5 Q a a 0 d r N N r r N r � 90 90N N � N N N ~ N N N ~ N n 0 c o' Vz- o. rn R o' U) I N O N --O�ON O N (0 U) r+ K O OL CD CY2000 CY2001 CY2002 CY2003 CY2004 CY2005 ICY2006 CY2007 o CY2008 CY2009 o CY2010 3 CY2011 3 m CY2012 o CY2013 v CY2014 CY2015 CY2016 CY2017 CY2018 CY2019 CY2020 CY2021 CY2022 CY2023 CY2024 ICY2025 CY2026 o CY2027 v CY2028 D cn CY2029 CY2030 CY2031 CY2032 CY2033 CY2034 CY2035 CY2036 CY2037 CY2038 CY2039 CY2040 00 N -P. O 00 O N � 0) 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CY2000 CY2001 CY2002 CY2003 CY2004 CY2005 ICY2006 CY2007 o CY2008 CY2009 o CY2010 3 CY2011 3 m CY2012 o CY2013 v CY2014 CY2015 CY2016 CY2017 CY2018 CY2019 CY2020 CY2021 CY2022 CY2023 CY2024 ICY2025 CY2026 o CY2027 v CY2028 D cn CY2029 CY2030 CY2031 CY2032 CY2033 CY2034 CY2035 CY2036 CY2037 CY2038 CY2039 CY2040 • O o rn � O * CDrn CD 0 n 3 cn 0' cn rn v' cn r+ n cn O 0 N ® ® O C7 C7 O U� I-•� c O 00 (D 70 C � CD 0 � _ < � CO 70 rn r 0 V1 v NCD < - Q 0 F) CD � 0 p cn cn 70 � OIQ • O 0 r -F CL :3 0 ^ 0 CD — c� v r 0 v N O N N O N (S1 N O N O N M Cg (31 M C CD CD 53 0 Q O C7 CY n• a \V CD N O N N O 1� O �E W co (D OR O 00 N 0 O N. 9 CD CD 0 'n cn C7 F -M 0 n / cn N O N Cal N O N O N O N O N (S1 N O N O �E iJJ W fD d Co N 0 cn 2 0 (D �E CA) CCD N N N N (O 00 N 0 \ CD "n 0 n cn CD OIQ CD 0 D � <0 n z' D 0 n cn o' O � N N to w ,p -A Ul m 00 U1 N Ql H N m W 00 W W OV O D O V � O W coo � F,a V 00 W N N N w w u, -i cn Ln m co m F, (.0 O W O Ul w a O n N I— CZ ro V C< N V p m ,? m F-' V 0 N O A 00 -P w O ofb � `D73 o� Z� a ` ~a~ m :3 m N o � w p.W � Ln W � y < a rp T .p =-Tl F-, C y Q1 W lD U7 O n GJ rb m 4 F, { Ul O +-ri --! V n Ol Ol Z3 f Vyj '�*, Q rb p LQ �' rb a p 4 ru N W F, W N w W to O O 01 lD a) W 00 lD lD N lD 61 CO (31 4�- N N N 00 00 M CD 00 M Ol w Ul (O O ;1 F, N W 00 N N F' F, F, F, N N F, N NP 00 N IO lC W U'I 00 4�:- V W �I M lD .►P .4k W N Gl �l w � O F' W m N Ql M N Ln F, Ul N W W N O F, F, F' N F, N w 00 .A IO N N W o0 00 00 00 W lD 00 1-1 Q1 lD W A N A N w �I O V W F, m lD m rn o o Q 0) O N v � U) n (D U) II � o' D � toFv N to w ,p -A Ul m 00 U1 N Ql O N W 00 W W OV O D V O W coo � F,a V 00 W N N N w w u, -Ph cn Ln m co m F, (.0 O W O Ul w O O N N I— m N V 00 N V m m N m F-' V 0 N O A 00 -P w ofb N Ol n a a ` Q N m N o � w p.W � Ln W � N IO a W N .p 4h F-, lD O Q1 W lD U7 O FA 0 lI m 61 F, 00 Ul Ill Ql --! V U7 Ol Ol rn o o Q 0) O N v � U) n (D U) II � toFv N to w ,p -A Ul m 00 U1 to Ql O N W 00 W W OV V O W coo � F,a V 00 W N N N w w u, -Ph cn Ln m co m F, (.0 O W O Ul w O O N N I— m N V 00 N V m m N m F-' V N N O A 00 -P w N Ol N m N w -P w p.W Ln Ln W O N IO V W N .p 4h F-, lD O Q1 W lD U7 O FA 0 lI m 61 F, 00 Ul Ill Ql --! V U7 Ol Ol rn o o Q 0) O N v � U) n (D U) II � Cn W W ~' I—A F, F-' I-� N W W W W Ol W lD IN O V W U'1 00 �I O A W -P� 00 N (D P N N -P� 4�- Ln N W �A O In .A W -1l Ln W W o 9 m N 00 00 O 00 (D N --1 Un W N W U7 w 14 N W 00 -4 V rn W V v 00 V V 00 lG m IO Ql O 70 bo O CD (D � r+ CDD a p (U) II a) � z Q �i p rr n � < ll < m D Z O C (D 030 m m LI) t,D v D W o °<' n y y 00) G' �n N °' t7�0 o + o cn N CD L Gl -P -P Ln Lq O N W W W 4�- 00 V N lD 01 N W O 00 W CI1 P Cn W W ~' I—A F, F-' I-� N W W W W Ol W lD IN O V W U'1 00 �I O A W -P� 00 N (D P N N -P� 4�- Ln N W �A O In .A W -1l Ln W W ID m N 00 00 O 00 (D N --1 Un W N W U7 w 14 N W 00 -4 V rn W V v 00 V V 00 lG O O O IO Ql O bo O CD (D � r+ CDD a p (U) II a) � Q w y 1 rnCT1 rn D -Ph,� - . z o NJ� F "o O o F r cn U) 0 U) U) U) O O Q. W W W ' O 00 W W o (p W W O (D CD CD :-4 9) 1-10 p W O O O O O O O0 o _ w y 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I I I 1 I I I s D z o r I 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I I I 1 I I I s 0 CD 0 -h n I z w 3 O n' cD O r+ 3 D r+ 0 cD 0 --h F) cD -G9 N N O d7 0 CD 70 r+ Z3 r+ "D O 0 CD O CCD O �, CCD 120 0 O 3 3 cn CD CSD O O rn Cf) O II CD O o n n CD CD O II CD 00 N. O 1-' cD Z3 r+ 0 CD 0 -h n I z w 3 O n' cD O r+ 3 D r+ 0 cD 0 --h F) cD -G9 N N O d7 0 CD 70 r+ Z3 r+ "D O 0 CD O CCD O �, CCD 120 0 O 3 3 cn CD CSD O O O O O o �a o o o O o 0 o O 0 D CL O � 00 O �: n \ r+ o CD O 0 N�-&1+n CD = 3 cnO o 0 n 6 3p F• >< Q (D O Q i OIQC7 CDD o. CD � w Q° Q.v O Ln C: r 3n cn _0o o ch o W n 0. � D CD � O U) r+ Q n C)0 CD o � N 77 CD C) � � Q OL) Q n cn 1-1 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6B ITEM TITLE: Finance: Quarterly Update PROJECT NUMBER: MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS November 2017 Finance Quarterly Update November 14, 2017 Property Tax Calculation 101 Property Tax Levy Rate History Property Tax Comparison Property Tax Burden Property Tax Levy Rate Comparison Next Quarterly Update Questions City of Meridian Agenda State of Idaho Code –Title 63 “Revenue and Taxation” State of Idaho Code –Chapter 8 “Levy and Apportionment of Taxes” State of Idaho Code 63-802 “Limitation on Budget Requests –Limitation on Tax Charges –Exceptions” Cities may increase the property tax funded portion of their budgets by up to 3% over the highest of the previous three years , plus new construction and annexations. State of Idaho Code –Title 63“Revenue and Taxation” State of Idaho Code –Chapter 3 “Assessment of Real and Personal Property” State of Idaho Code 63-301A “New Construction Roll” The County accessor shall prepare a New Construction Roll for Cities by the First Monday in June . City of Meridian Property Tax Calculation 101 City of Meridian Property Tax Calculation 101 Determined by the highest approved/certified amount of taxes levied in the past three years Cities may increase the property tax funded by up to 3% Ada County provides the City with the Value of New Construction within the taxing districts. Ada County provides the City with the Value of New Annexations within the taxing districts. City of Meridian Property Tax Levy Rate History City of Meridian Property Tax Levy Rate History City of Meridian Property Tax Levy Rate History How the County calculates the City of Meridian’s annual Levy Rate •Total Requested Property Taxes •Divided By •Total City of Meridian Property Tax Value •Equals •Total Certified Annual Levy Rate City of Meridian Property Tax Calculation 101 City of Meridian Property Tax Calculation 101 $30,624,742 $8,272,756,755 0.003701879 City of Meridian Property Tax Comparison City of Meridian Property Tax Burden City of Meridian Property Tax Levy Rate Comparison What we Presented: Property Tax Calculation 101 Property Tax Levy Rate History Property Tax Comparison Property Tax Burden Property Tax Levy Rate Comparison City of Meridian Recap Information will focus on financial results from previous fiscal year Actual versus Budget Revenue Personnel Operating Capital Changes to Fund Balance Revenue Expense Ratios What percentage of expenses utilized total available revenue Top 5 Revenue Sources Top 5 Expense Sources City of Meridian Next Quarterly Update City of Meridian Questions Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Police Department/Code Enforcement Division: Proposed Updates to Nuisance Code MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS DRAFT 11/14/17 UPDATES TO NUISANCE CODE PAGE 1 OF 6 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. ________________ BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, MILAM, PALMER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, REPEALING AND REPLACING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 2, MERIDIAN CITY CODE, REGARDING NUISANCES, SPECIFICALLY: DEFINITIONS; RESPONSIBLE PARTY; PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES FOR ABATABLE NUISANCES; PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES FOR GENERAL NUISANCES; HINDERING AUTHORIZED PERSON; ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code section 50-317, cities are empowered to cause all sidewalks and alleys to be cleared of snow, ice, rubbish, and weeds, and to abate nuisances on private property within the city, and to assess the cost thereof against the property so abated; WHEREAS, in addressing abatable nuisance conditions, the City’s primary objective is the expedited abatement of same, with the deterrence of ongoing or repeated incidences of such nuisance conditions through criminal prosecution and penalties as a secondary enforcement tool; WHEREAS, in addressing general nuisance conditions, the City’s primary objective is deterring ongoing or repeating incidences of such nuisance conditions through criminal prosecution and penalties; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian finds that these updates to the City of Meridian Nuisance Code are in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: Section 1. That Title 4, Section 2, Meridian City Code, shall be repealed, and replaced with language to read as follows: 4-2-1: DEFINITIONS: A. GRAFFITI: Any inscription, work, figure, symbol, drawing, mark, or design that is marked, etched, scratched, drawn, or painted on any real or personal property or improvement, including, but not limited to, walls, fences, gates, pavement, buildings, rocks, trees, bridges, streets, sidewalks, and/or signs, whether such property is public, private, temporary, or permanent, without the consent of the owner of such property or the owner’s authorized agent, and which inscription, work, figure, symbol, drawing, mark, or design is visible from any publicly accessible location. B. JUNK VEHICLE: Any vehicle, or parts thereof, which: 1. Cannot be safely operated under its own power; 2. Is missing any one of the following: foot brakes, hand brakes, headlights, taillights, horn, muffler, rearview mirrors, windshield wipers, or adequate fenders; DRAFT 11/14/17 UPDATES TO NUISANCE CODE PAGE 2 OF 6 3. Has been declared salvage, or has been physically damaged to the extent that the cost of parts and labor minus the salvage value would make it uneconomical to repair or rebuild such vehicle; or 4. Is otherwise in a wrecked, partially dismantled, inoperative, or dilapidated condition. This definition shall not include junk vehicles lawfully stored or parked pursuant to the operation of a lawfully conducted business, industry or commercial enterprise. C. NUISANCE: Anything which unreasonably injures or offends the health or senses; obstructs the free passage, comfortable enjoyment, or customary use of public or private property; or creates an actual or potential safety, health, or fire hazard. Nuisances shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following conditions designated as abatable nuisances and as general nuisances: 1. ABATABLE NUISANCE: Nuisance conditions that may be abated by the city in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, specifically including, without limitation, the following nuisance conditions: a. Nuisance weeds. b. Graffiti, on any surface. c. Snow or ice on any public sidewalk abutting or adjoining any privately owned premises. d. Vegetation, other than trees, that impedes or obstructs a public sidewalk or roadway. 2. GENERAL NUISANCE: Nuisance conditions that may lead to criminal charges without any prior attempt by the city to obtain abatement thereof, specifically including, without limitation, the following nuisance conditions: a. Nuisance materials on the ground, except that this definition shall not include the incidental leakage of nuisance materials from registered vehicles lawfully moving or parked upon a public right of way; the lawful application of pesticides or herbicides for purposes of controlling pests or weeds; or activity otherwise specifically allowed by law or by written permit issued by the city or other governing authority. b. Personal property on any portion of a public sidewalk, except as specifically allowed by law or by written permit issued by the city or other governing authority. c. One or more junk vehicle(s), where such junk vehicle is not enclosed in any structure or otherwise concealed from public view pursuant to title 11 of this code. d. Stagnant or impure water which causes or creates an offensive, unhealthy, or unsanitary condition. e. Refuse, vegetative decay or any decaying substance, garbage or filth of any kind which is exposed to the elements and which causes or creates an offensive, unhealthy, or unsanitary condition. f. Discarded matter which has no substantial market value, is exposed to the elements, and is not enclosed in any structure or otherwise concealed from public view, including, but not limited to: rubble, litter, asphalt, concrete, plaster, tile, cardboard, paper, scrap wood, scrap metal, tires, broken glass, and/or other dilapidated or deteriorating personal property. g. The accumulation of and/or failure to lawfully dispose of solid waste on any commercial or residential premises. h. Any building or structure that is so dilapidated or is in such condition as to menace the public health or the safety of persons or property due to increased fire hazard or other hazard. i. Any nuisance condition not otherwise enumerated in this chapter. Commented [EK1]: The definitions of abatable and general nuisance were separate; proposed update moves them under nuisance for clarity Also combined definition of these nuisances and provisions describing prohibited nuisances (formerly in 4-2-2). Commented [EK2]: Added this nuisance – this condition is common and suitable for City abatement. Nuisance trees are handled by City Arborist Elroy Huff, but we currently have no provision for bushes and other vegetation that blocks the sidewalk. Commented [EK3]: Moved these nuisances to the general nuisance section – these are issues that the property owner must address. They are not well suited for City abatement. DRAFT 11/14/17 UPDATES TO NUISANCE CODE PAGE 3 OF 6 D. NUISANCE MATERIALS: Hazardous, noxious, dangerous, or offensive materials, including, but not limited to, oil, gasoline, fuel, antifreeze, paint, pesticides, or herbicides. E. NUISANCE WEEDS: Undesirable plant growth, whether living or dead, which: 1. Is over eight inches (8") in height; 2. By reason of size, manner of growth, location, or dryness, constitutes a safety, health, or fire hazard to any person, building, improvement, crop, or other real or personal property; 3. By reason of size, manner of growth, or location, impedes or obstructs a sidewalk or roadway or any portion thereof; or 4. Is designated as a noxious weed by the state of Idaho. This definition shall not include cultivated grasses and pastures, though such vegetation may be declared a nuisance where otherwise appropriate. 4-2-2: RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Responsible Party: Where a nuisance exists upon property that is vacant, abandoned, and/or uninhabited, the owner of record, as reflected on the most recent assessment roll, shall be presumed to be responsible for creating, causing, committing, maintaining, and/or allowing such nuisance. Such owner of record shall be subject to any and all penalties imposed as set forth herein, and shall be responsible for payment of any and all costs incurred in abating the nuisance. The owner of record shall bear the burden of rebutting this presumption. 4-2-3: ABATABLE NUISANCES; PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES: A. Applicability: The procedures set forth in this section shall apply to abatable nuisances. B. Abatable Nuisance Unlawful. It shall be unlawful for any owner, occupant, user, or person in charge or control of any property to create, cause, commit, maintain, or allow the existence of any abatable nuisance on such property, or upon any street, sidewalk or public right of way abutting such property including the area behind curbs, sidewalks, parking areas, and property to the center of alleys and ditches. Further, it shall be unlawful for any person to create, cause, allow, or commit any nuisance upon any public property, right of way, or infrastructure, including sidewalks, streets, gutters, or storm drains. C. Procedure: If it is determined by a code enforcement officer that an abatable nuisance exists, the code enforcement officer shall cause a notice of violation and order to abate to be issued to the owner, occupier, and/or person in control of such property. Such notice and order shall contain the street address and parcel number of the property, describe the nuisance existing thereon, order the abatement of the nuisance, establish the time period for abatement, specify the penalty for noncompliance, and describe the opportunity and time for appeal. The code enforcement officer shall issue such notice and order to the owner, occupier, or person in control of the property on which the nuisance exists in one of the following ways: 1. By personal service upon such owner, occupier, or person in charge or control of the property; or 2. By regular mail to such owner, occupier, or person in charge or control of the property, at the address shown on the last available assessment roll, or as otherwise known; or Commented [EK4]: Combined definition and description/exemptions (that were in 4-2-2) into one place. Commented [EK5]: Combined definition of nuisance weeds and provisions describing prohibited weeds (that were in 4-2-2). Commented [EK6]: No proposed change to this language, but the description of the prohibited nuisances that were in this section were moved to the definitions section. Commented [EK7]: New provision that clarifies responsible party’s obligation – makes it clear that abatable nuisances, if not addressed, are referred to criminal court. No other changes to this section are proposed. DRAFT 11/14/17 UPDATES TO NUISANCE CODE PAGE 4 OF 6 3. By posting such notice and order at a conspicuous place on the property and publishing one notice in the official newspaper of the city that the property has been posted in accordance with this chapter and ordering the owner, occupier, or person in charge or control of the property. D. Time Period For Abatement: It shall be the duty of the owner, occupier, or person in charge or control of any property where any abatable nuisance exists, to abate such nuisance within five (5) calendar days from the date of personal service, mailing, or publication, except that the code enforcement officer may require summary abatement of an abatable nuisance where such condition presents an imminent or ongoing threat to or impairment of human health or safety. Abatement of graffiti shall meet the following standards: 1. The removal of such graffiti shall not follow the pattern of the graffiti such that the inscription, work, figure, symbol, drawing, mark, or design of such graffiti remains apparent. 2. The removal of such graffiti by painting over it shall be reasonably similar or identical to the original color of the surface upon which such graffiti was applied. 3. If the surface is heavily covered with graffiti, the entire surface shall be repainted. E. Appeal: Within five (5) calendar days from the date of service, mailing, or publication of the notice of violation and order to abate, the owner, occupier, and/or person in charge or control of the subject property may appeal to the city council by filing a written appeal with the city clerk, which appeal shall enumerate the grounds for appeal. The city clerk may schedule such appeal for hearing at the next regular meeting of city council. City council shall consider written and oral testimony from the appellant and shall affirm, withdraw, or modify the order to abate. The decision of the city council shall be final. If city council affirms the order, the appellant shall have five (5) calendar days from the date of such affirmation to abate the nuisance as ordered. F. Criminal Penalties: If, following notice of violation and order to abate, any person allows the existence of an abatable nuisance, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Each and every day in which any such violation continues may be deemed a separate offense. Upon conviction for a violation of this section, the city shall request from the criminal court an order of restitution for any and all costs of abatement and/or other related costs incurred by the city. Peace officers and code enforcement officers shall have the authority to issue uniform citations to violators of this section. G. Civil Penalties: In addition to any other penalties described in this section, the city may also take civil action to obtain an order enjoining the ongoing maintenance of such property free from nuisance, and/or to recover any and all costs of abatement, enforcement, litigation, and/or prosecution including, but not limited to, attorney fees and court costs. H. Abatement; Administrative Penalties: In addition to pursuing criminal and/or civil penalties, and notwithstanding the imposition of any civil or criminal fine, penalty or imprisonment, the code enforcement officer, after providing notice and hearing as provided herein, may abate or cause the abatement of any abatable nuisance where the owner, occupant, agent or person in control of property does not comply in all respects with an order to abate, the code enforcement officer may abate or cause the abatement of such nuisance. The owner, occupier, and/or person in charge or control of the subject property shall be billed, assessed, and/or held responsible for any and all actual expenses of such work, and any related charges, including fees and fines that may be imposed pursuant to this chapter and/or adopted by fee schedule, pursuant to the following procedures: DRAFT 11/14/17 UPDATES TO NUISANCE CODE PAGE 5 OF 6 1. Recovery of Abatement Costs And Fees: Within thirty (30) days of abatement of the nuisance, the city shall send to the owner, occupier, and/or person in charge or control of the subject property, by regular mail, a billing statement requiring payment to city the costs of abating the nuisance and administrative fee as established by fee schedule. 2. Nonpayment of Abatement Costs: If full payment is not made to city within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of the billing statement requiring payment of abatement costs and fees, the city may: a. Attempt to recover such amount through the city bill collection procedures; b. Add the amount due and owing to the municipal utility service account related to the property on which the nuisance was abated and collect such amount in accordance with utility bill collection procedures; and/or c. Levy a special assessment against the subject property pursuant to Idaho Code sections 50- 1008 and 50-334 and/or any subsequently adopted or otherwise applicable laws. Notice of the special assessment shall be sent by regular mail to the owner of the subject property, and shall state the address and parcel number of the subject property, date of abatement action taken, and state the amount to be assessed, including any applicable administrative and/or late fees, and shall state that if the assessment is not paid within thirty (30) days, the assessment will be placed on the real property tax rolls and will become a lien against such property. If payment to the city clerk is not made within thirty (30) days after mailing the notice of special assessment, the assessment shall be declared delinquent and shall be certified, including a ten percent (10%) late fee, to the Ada County assessor by the city clerk, not later than August 1 of each year. Upon such certification, the assessment shall be placed upon the tax roll and shall thereafter become a lien against the property described in the notice and shall be collected in the same manner and subject to the same penalties as other city taxes. Upon payment of the assessment, fees and penalties in full, the city clerk shall file a release of lien with the Ada County assessor. I. Summary Abatement: Nothing contained herein shall prevent a code enforcement officer, peace officer, or fire marshal from requiring, undertaking, or causing summary abatement of an abatable nuisance where such condition presents an imminent or ongoing threat to or impairment of human health or safety. J. Noxious Weeds: In addition to other remedies set forth in this chapter, the code enforcement officer may notify Ada County of the presence of any noxious weeds. 4-2-4: GENERAL NUISANCES; PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES: A. Applicability: The procedures set forth in this section shall apply to general nuisances. B. General Nuisance Unlawful. It shall be unlawful for any owner, occupant, user, or person in charge or control of any property to create, cause, commit, maintain, or allow the existence of any general nuisance on such property, or upon any street, sidewalk or public right of way abutting such property including the area behind curbs, sidewalks, parking areas, and property to the center of alleys and ditches. Further, it shall be unlawful for any person to create, cause, allow, or commit any nuisance upon any public property, right of way, or infrastructure, including sidewalks, streets, gutters, or storm drains. Commented [EK8]: This addition authorizes the City to collect the cost of nuisance abatement from the property owner by adding it to the City utility bill. Commented [EK9]: New provision that clarifies responsible party’s obligation – makes it clear that abatable nuisances, if not addressed, are referred to criminal court. No other changes to this section are proposed. DRAFT 11/14/17 UPDATES TO NUISANCE CODE PAGE 6 OF 6 C. Criminal Penalties: Any person who causes, creates, or allows the existence of any general nuisance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Each and every day in which any such violation shall continue shall be deemed a separate offense. Peace officers and code enforcement officers shall have the authority to issue uniform citations to violators of this section. Issuance of notice of violation and order to abate shall not be a mandatory prerequisite to issuance of a uniform citation under this section. D. Civil Penalties: In addition to any other penalties described in this section, the city may also take civil action to obtain an order mandating the abatement of such general nuisance and ongoing maintenance of such property free from nuisance, and/or to recover any and all costs of enforcement, litigation, and/or prosecution including, but not limited to, attorney fees and court costs. E. Summary Abatement: Nothing contained herein shall prevent a code enforcement officer, peace officer, or fire marshal from requiring, undertaking, or causing summary abatement of a general nuisance condition where such condition presents an imminent or ongoing threat to or impairment of human health or safety. 4-2-5: HINDERING AUTHORIZED PERSON: It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor to interfere with, hinder or refuse to allow any authorized city official or employee to enter upon private or public property to enforce the provisions of this chapter. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6D PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Public Works: Proposed Update to MCC 9-4-24 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Draft of 9-3-24 Ord for Workshop Discussion- November 8, 2017 1. Underlined proposed changes to current definitions in MCC section 9-4-2 are indicated below: 9-4-2: DEFINITIONS: Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the meanings of terms used in this chapter shall be as follows: ACT: The Federal W ater Pollution Control Act entitled Public Law 92-500, and its amendments of 1972, as administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). BOD: Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) shall mean the quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter under standard laboratory procedure in five (5) days at twenty degrees centigrade (20°C), expressed in milligrams per liter (mg/l). BUILDING DRAIN: That part of the lowest horizontal piping of a drainage system which receives the discharge of sanitary waste inside the walls of the building and conveys it to the building sewer, beginning five feet (5') outside the inner face of the building wall. BUILDING SEWER: The extension from the building drain to the point of connection with the public sewer. CITY: The City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, or its authorized or designated agent, representative, or deputy thereto. COMBINED SEWER: A sewer receiving both stormwater runoff and sanitary sewage. FLOW: The volume of sewage being discharged into the sewage system from all sources including domestic, commercial and industrial uses and infiltration (WW). GARBAGE: Solid wastes from the domestic and commercial preparation, cooking and dispensing of food, and from the handling, storage and sale of produce. INDUSTRIAL USERS: Any nondomestic user with an indirect discharge of effluent into a POTW by means of pipes, conduits, pumping stations, force mains, constructed drainage ditches, surface water intercepting ditches, and all constructed devices and appliances appurtenant thereto. This term includes federal, state, and local facilities as part of the regulated community, since such entities are subject to federal pretreatment regulations. See chapter 2, "Sewer Pretreatment", of this title. INDUSTRIAL WASTES: The liquid wastes from industrial manufacturing processes, trade or business as distinct from sanitary sewage. MULTIPLE BUILDING DEVELOPMENT: Includes the various types of developments that would have common or joint ownership areas such as condominiums, townhouses, mobile home parks or courts, shopping centers, etc. NATURAL OUTLET: Any outlet into a watercourse, pond, ditch, lake or other body of surface or ground water. OWNER: A person owning real property which is, or proposes to be connected to the sewage system. PERSON: Any individual, firm, company, association, society, corporation or group. Draft of 9-3-24 Ord for Workshop Discussion- November 8, 2017 pH: The logarithm of the reciprocal of the weight of hydrogen ions in grams per liter of solution with a pH value of 7 being neutral. PRETREATMENT: The reduction of the amount of pollutants, the elimination of pollutants, or the alteration of the nature of pollutant properties in wastewater prior to, or in lieu of, introducing such pollutants into the POTW. This reduction or alteration can be obtained by physical, chemical, or biological processes; by process changes; or by other means, except by diluting the concentration of the pollutants unless allowed by an applicable pretreatment standard. PRIVATE LIFT STATION: Privately owned and operated pump station positioned in the sewer system at which wastewater is pumped to a higher level. PROPERLY SHREDDED GARBAGE: The wastes from the preparation, cooking and dispensing of food that have been shredded to such a degree that all particles will be carried freely under the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers, with no particle greater than one-half inch (1/2") in any dimension. PUBLIC SEWER: A sewer in which all owners of abutting properties have equal rights, and is controlled by public authority. SANITARY SEWER: A sewer which carries sanitary sewage and to which storm, surface and ground waters are not admitted. SERVICE CONNECTION: The point at which the building sewer connects to the public sewer. SEWAGE OR WASTE MATTER: A combination of the water carried wastes from residences, business buildings, institutions and industrial establishments. SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT OR WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY: Any devices and system used in the storage, treatment, recycling and reclamation of municipal sanitary sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature to implement section 201 of the act. Also termed a "publicly owned treatment works" (POTW). SEWER: A pipe or conduit for carrying sewage. SHALL/MAY: "Shall" is mandatory. "May" is permissive. SLUG: Any discharge of water, sewage or industrial waste which in concentration of any given constituent or in quantity of flow exceeds for any period of duration longer than fifteen (15) minutes for more than five (5) times the average twenty four (24) hour concentration or flows during normal operation. STORM DRAIN (Sometimes Termed STORM SEWER): A sewer which carries storm and surface waters and drainage, but excludes sanitary sewage and industrial wastes, other than unpolluted water such as cooling water. SUPERINTENDENT: The person designated by the City of Meridian, to supervise the operation of the POTW, who is charged with certain duties and responsibilities by this chapter, or duly authorized representative. SUSPENDED SOLIDS: Solids, organic or inorganic, that either float on the surface of, or are in suspension in water, sewage, or other liquids, and which are removable by laboratory filtering as Draft of 9-3-24 Ord for Workshop Discussion- November 8, 2017 prescribed in "Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Waste Water" and referred to as nonfilterable residue. WASTEWATER SYSTEM: All facilities for collecting, pumping, treating of sewage and disposal of treated effluent. WASTEWATER USER: Any individual, firm, company, association, society or corporation or group who has connected to the sewer system. WATERCOURSE: A channel in which a flow of water occurs, either continuously or intermittently. WINTER AVERAGE: The average domestic water consumption from approximately November 15 to approximately March 15 as quantified by water meter readings. (Ord. 08-1389, 10-28-2008, eff. 10-28- 2008) 2. The current MCC 9-4-24 would be repealed and replaced as proposed below (excluding the Assessment Fees section which hasn’t been updated yet): 9-4-24: WASTEWATER USER CHARGES: Wastewater user charges are comprised of Base Fees, Use Fees, and Assessment Fees. A. Wastewater Base Fees: 1. To cover the fixed costs of the wastewater system, each account is charged a monthly flat base fee. a. The wastewater base fee shall be established by resolution of the City Council. B. Wastewater Use Fees: Monthly use fees for wastewater collection (sewer) and treatment in the city are based on gallons of water collected and treated as determined by water meter readings for the water used (delivered to the same building / account). The fee per gallon of use shall be established by resolution of the City Council. Wastewater use is determined according to the following: 1. Residential Accounts: There are two time periods during which wastewater use is determined during the year: a. Winter Period: During four winter months between November and March, wastewater use is based on monthly gallons of water delivered as determined by water meter readings. Example: If 5,000 gallons of water were delivered then 5,000 gallons of wastewater use will be billed for that month. Depending on the account billing cycle, the four months that comprise the winter period will either be November through February, or December through March. b. Summer Period: During the months outside an account’s winter period, wastewater use is also based on monthly gallons of water delivered until the amount of water delivered reaches the account’s Wastewater Use Cap (see (1) below). If monthly water delivered is higher than the account’s Wastewater Use Cap, then the Draft of 9-3-24 Ord for Workshop Discussion- November 8, 2017 Wastewater Use Cap serves as the month’s wastewater use for billing. Example: If 9,000 gallons of water were delivered, but the Wastewater Use Cap for the account is 6,000 gallons, then 6,000 gallons of wastewater use will be billed. The Wastewater Use Cap is calculated / applied as follows: (1) Wastewater Use Cap: The W astewater Use Cap is the average monthly number of gallons of water that were delivered to the account during the winter period. (2) Default Wastewater Use Cap: In any instance where the customer’s Wastewater Use Cap calculates to less than 1,000 gallons per month or there is no customer data to calculate a Wastewater Use Cap, a default Wastewater Use Cap shall be applied. The default Wastewater Use Cap shall be established by resolution of City Council and is intended to represent the monthly wastewater use of a typical residential account. (3) Upon request, the Wastewater Use Cap may be reviewed and evaluated. Determination of applicability will be made by the City Public Works Director or designee and include an evaluation of current and potential water and sewer uses at the property and to determine if the application of an adjusted Wastewater Use Cap will result in fair wastewater billing. 2. Commercial Accounts: Wastewater use fees for all other users such as commercial and industrial are based on actual monthly water delivered as determined by water meter readings. a. Commercial accounts that show a residential pattern of water and wastewater use may be eligible for an applied W astewater Use Cap during the summer period as set forth in the section for residential accounts. Determination of applicability will be made by the City Public Works Director or designee and include an evaluation of current and potential water and sewer uses at the property to determine if the application of a Wastewater Use Cap will result in fair wastewater billing. b. Commercial accounts with water uses that are not collected in the sewer may be eligible for periodic adjustment to the wastewater portion of their bill if the amount of water used but not collected can be demonstrated. C. Wastewater Assessment Fees: 1. Wastewater assessment fees for all newly established or upgrade sewer services shall be established by resolution of City Council. The assessment fees for all uses other than single-family residential, shall be based on the number of equivalent residential units (ERUs) listed in table 2 of this section, unless other acceptable means of determining ERUs are used. Other acceptable means may include the uniform plumbing code "fixture unit" method or examination and analysis of historical consumption records of similar facilities within or outside the City of Meridian. Single Family Residential assessment fees shall be based on 1 ERU. Draft of 9-3-24 Ord for Workshop Discussion- November 8, 2017 TABLE 2 EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL UNITS Classification Number Of Equivalent Connections Minimum Equivalent Connections Apartment See Multiple living unit Bank 2 Bar 2 Barbershop, per chair 0.5 1.0 Beauty salon, per operator station 0.5 1.0 Bowling alley, per lane 0.2 1.0 Cafe, per customer seating capacity 0.1 2.0 Car dealer 2 Car wash (to be computed on an individual basis) - Church 2 Club, private 2 Condominium See Multiple living unit Dentist, per practitioner 1 Department store, per 3,000 square feet 1 Doctor, per practitioner 1 Drugstore 2 Dry cleaners 2 Duplex See Multiple living unit Fourplex See Multiple living unit Garage 2 Grocery store See Retail food store Draft of 9-3-24 Ord for Workshop Discussion- November 8, 2017 Hospital, per bed 0.15 Industry: Major contributing industry (as per separate agreement) - Minor contributing industry (as per separate agreement) - Laundries: Commercial (to be computed on an individual basis) - Self-service: Up to and including 10 washing machines Each washing machine in excess of 10 4 0.25 Lodge or private club 2 Mobile home court or park: First space 1 Each additional space, long term tenant type 1 Each additional space, short term tenant type 1 Mobile home or trailer house on own premises 1 Motel, hotel, rooming house, etc.: With cooking facilities: First unit Each additional unit 1 0.5 Without cooking facilities: First unit Each additional unit 1 0.25 Multiple living unit: Draft of 9-3-24 Ord for Workshop Discussion- November 8, 2017 Studio or 1 bedroom 1 2 bedrooms 1 3 or more bedrooms 1 Office building, for each 2,500 square feet of gross floor space or fraction thereof 1 Photo development lab 2 Railroad depot 2 Restaurant, per customer seating capacity 0.1 2.0 Retail food store, for each 1,500 square feet of gross floor area or fraction thereof 1 Retail store, for each 3,000 square feet of gross floor area or fraction thereof 1 Schools, per each 50 students in average daily attendance or fraction thereof 1 Service station: Full service 4 Gas and restroom service only 2 With car wash (to be computed on an individual basis) - Single-family residence 1 Swimming pool: Private, for each 500 square feet of pool water surface area 0.25 Public (to be computed on an individual basis) - Tavern 2 Draft of 9-3-24 Ord for Workshop Discussion- November 8, 2017 Theater 2 Townhouse 1 Trailer court or park: First unit 1 Each additional space, long term tenant type 0.75 Each additional space, short term tenant type 0.5 Triplex See Multiple living unit Variety store, for each 3,000 square feet of gross floor area or fraction thereof 1 (Ord. 04-1105, 10-5-2004) 3. The current MCC 9-4-27 will be repealed and replaced with the proposed update below: 9-4-27: BILLING AND PAYMENT OF MONTHLY CHARGES: All monthly wastewater charges shall be due and payable from the owner to the finance department between the fifth and twentieth day of each month for billing from the previous cycle. For new construction, the monthly user charge shall be computed from the issue date of any certificate of occupancy. Current City Code Sections Proposed to be Repealed and Replaced 9-4-24: WASTEWATER USER FEES AND ASSESSMENT FEES: The monthly sewer user rates for sanitary sewer service in the city are based on gallons of water used as determined by the water meter readings. Residential homeowners' sanitary sewer user charges will be based on the actual water recorded for monthly water meter readings during the period of the year from approximately November 15 to the following March 15. For the following eight (8) month period, the average monthly reading for the period of November 15 to the following March 15, termed the "winter average", shall be the basis for the monthly sewer user charge. However, if the actual water use recorded for any billing period between March 15 and November 15 is less than the preceding "winter average", the sewer user charge will be based on the actual water use. Also, provided, however, where there is a new owner, a new occupancy, or a change in occupancy, such as in the case of sale or new residence construction or sales of existing residences, between November 15 and March 15, the sewer user charge shall be based on the average winter residential water use in the city which is six thousand five hundred (6,500) gallons per month unless the current water meter reading is less than six thousand five hundred (6,500) gallons. In this case, the sewer user charge will be based on actual metered water use. All other users such as commercial and industrial shall be based on their monthly water consumption. The user charges may be reviewed annually. The user charge system is based on the following: A. Monthly Service Charges: 1. The minimum sewer charge shall be as established by resolution of the city council. B. Number Of Equivalent Residential Units Per Use: The wastewater assessment fees for all new sewer users, other than single-family residential, shall be based on the number of equivalent residential units (ERUs) listed in table 2 of this section, unless other acceptable means of determining ERUs are used. Other acceptable means may include the uniform plumbing code "fixture unit" method or examination and analysis of historical consumption records of similar facilities within or outside the city of Meridian. TABLE 2 EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL UNITS (NO CHANGES TO TABLE CURRENTLY PROPOSED, SO TABLE WAS NOT INCLUDED) 9-4-27: BILLING AND PAYMENT OF MONTHLY CHARGES: All monthly sewer charges shall be due and payable from the owner to the finance department between the first and tenth day ofeach month for billing from the previous cycle. For new construction, the monthly user charge shall be computed from the date the service connection has been inspected and approved or when the building being served is substantially completed, whichever is the latest date. For new residential construction completed during the eight (8) lawn sprinkling months, the monthly sewer user charges shall be based on the use of six thousand five hundred (6,500) gallons per month or actual use, whichever is less. (Ord. 04-1105, 10-5-2004) 1 C.Jay Coles From:Andrea Pogue Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2017 10:04 AM To:C.Jay Coles Subject:FW: MCC 9-4-24 Ordinance Update C. Jay, I received this from Mr. Slyter. I guess we should add it to his other emails. Thanks. Andrea From: Merlin Slyter [mailto:merwinter@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 2:10 AM To: Andrea Pogue Subject: Fw: MCC 9-4-24 Ordinance Update Ms. Pogue, One further thought: the City allows property managers to keep the account in their name from one tenant to the next--which I addressed in my revision to assure that the language of the Code did not support using the previous tenant's water use history to calculate a default Wastewater Use Cap for the new tenants. Language may be desired to require/strongly encourage property managers or owners/residents in similar situations to necessarily notify the City when there IS a change of occupancy. The Utility Billing Office then creates an intermediate billing statement, to calculate a pro-rated bill for a move-in or move-out situation. I strongly support the practice of allowing the property manager to keep the account in his/her name, since the City will bill the property manager/owner after a move-out, if the tenants do not pay. But a property manager should still be responsible to the City, and notify the City properly of occupancy changes. Merlin Slyter On Monday, November 13, 2017 9:55 AM, Andrea Pogue < apogue@meridiancity.org > wrote: Hi there, I will forward both emails to the Clerk. I think the Mayor and City Council expected we reach out to you to get your input so it is a little bit different situation from normal workshop process. The public is always welcome to sit in and observe a workshop meeting. Thank you. Andrea 2 From: Merlin Slyter [ mailto:merwinter@yahoo.com ] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 10:17 PM To: Andrea Pogue Subject: Re: MCC 9-4-24 Ordinance Update Ms. Pogue, I had thought that the afternoon City Council meetings were not open for public input. Nonetheless, Tuesday afternoon is not likely open for me to attend the meeting. Certainly, forward my notes to the Clerk. In re-reading my own revision, I believe it might be better. As I first suggested: (2) Default Wastewater Use Cap: In any instance where the customer’s Wastewater Use Cap calculates to less than 1,000 gallons per month or an account was not held by or for the current residents at the same location by which to calculate there is no customer data to calculate a Wastewater Use Cap, a default Wastewater Use Cap shall be applied. The default Wastewater Use Cap shall be established by resolution of City Council and is intended to represent the monthly wastewater use of a typical residential account in the City of Meridian. With slightly different wording: (2) Default Wastewater Use Cap: In any instance where the customer’s Wastewater Use Cap calculates to less than 1,000 gallons per month or where the account was not held by or for the current customers at the same location such that a Wastewater Use Cap has not been calculated, there is no customer data to calculate a Wastewater Use Cap , a default Wastewater Use Cap shall be applied. The default Wastewater Use Cap shall be established by resolution of City Council and is intended to represent the monthly wastewater use of a typical residential account in the City of Meridian. I don't want to re-state my reasonings necessarily, so to consider what questions or logical gaps these revisions may address, please refer to my previous email to Ms. Pogue. Thank you again for considering, and for moving upon, suggestions to update MCC 9-4-24. Merlin Slyter On Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:35 PM, Andrea Pogue < apogue@meridiancity.org > wrote: Mr. Slyter, Thank you for your reply and comments. I can forward your email to the Clerk if you would like it to be part of the record next week or you can address your thoughts directly to the Mayor and Council at the meeting. Let me know your preference. In the meantime, I will forward your email to the staff that has been working on the draft so they can consider your comments and input as well. It’s just a guess, but the progression after the presentation will either be that the Council will recommend moving forward with the update as drafted or give guidance on what they would like to see changed. If they like it “as is” then the draft will be put on hold until the assessment fees section gets updated and approved. If they would like something changed they will re-set it for a future meeting probably the December workshop meeting (2 nd Tuesday) to review the draft again. The goal is to do one Resolution for the MCC 9-4-24 update instead of in bits and pieces with the target being to finish the project by early spring of 2018. My understanding regarding the actual value to be used for the default wastewater use cap is that it is under review, but I don’t know more than that at this time. 3 I hope this is helpful. Thank you. Andrea From: Merlin Slyter [ mailto:merwinter@yahoo.com ] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 12:37 PM To: Andrea Pogue Subject: Re: MCC 9-4-24 Ordinance Update Andrea, Thank you for notice of the proposed changes to the ordinance(s). Upon quick review, it appears that my concerns are being addressed. My thanks to all of those involved. With my first read-thru, I thought, "Good, but a change of occupancy has not been addressed". When I read the phrase, "or there is no customer data to calculate a Wastewater Use Cap", I considered the City's stubborn interpretation that zero use does not give data by which to calculate a Winter Average, as was oft repeated at the Hearing. (I pointed out that zero use is data.) As written in the proposed changes, that could be inferred as the purpose of that phrase, or there might be "no customer data to calculate a Wastewate r Use Cap" because of a failure of the City's systems to record the data, which would not be fair to the user. In other words, I believe that phrase is too vague. Consider: (2) Default Wastewater Use Cap: In any instance where the customer’s Wastewater Use Cap calculates to less than 1,000 gallons per month or an account was not held by or for the current residents at the same location by which to calculate there is no customer data to calculate a Wastewater Use Cap, a default Wastewater Use Cap shall be applied. The default Wastewater Use Cap shall be established by resolution of City Council and is intended to represent the monthly wastewater use of a typical residential account in the City of Meridian. The changed wording also deals with the following: Utilities Billing Dept. allows property managers to keep the utility account in their (property manager's) name, rather than having the tenants hold the account directly. From one tenant to the next in that situation would be the same "account" in City records. The City has stated, and I agree, that the water use history of one set of residents at a given address should not be used as definitive history for a different set of residents at the same address. The wording as proposed could allow extraneous data from past residents to be the basis of charges for new residents, and as I said, is not clear in its purpose and is too vague. The "default Wastewater Use Cap", as proposed, is defined, and is defined as might commonly be understood to be the actual and current average " monthly wastewater use of a typical residential account" . (1) Do you know if the actual value is being updated to reflect that definition? Thank you again for keeping me in the loop. I hope this moves forward with careful and thorough deliberations. I am sure that there are a lot of subtle questions and ramifications that any one person would likely overlook. (2) After presentation to the City Council Workshop Meeting on 11/14/17, what is the likely progression of events? 4 Merlin Slyter P.S. (3) If this reply to you is not a sufficient or appropriate means for me to comment on the proposed changes such that my suggestion(s) could reach the Council's deliberations, what else should I do? On Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:45 AM, Andrea Pogue < apogue@meridiancity.org > wrote: Mr. Slyter, Attached is a courtesy copy of the update to MCC 9-4-24 that staff will present at the City Council Workshop meeting on Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 3:00 pm. Sincerely, Andrea M. Pogue Deputy City Attorney City of Meridian | City Attorney’s Office 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-898-5506 Built for Business, Designed for Living All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Legal: Updates to City Cocle provisions regarding Chiet Financial Officer/Information Services Director /7— %753 1. Ordinance No.: An Ordinance of the City of Meridian Amending Meridian City Code Section 1-8-1, Regarding Appointment of Department Officials by Mayor; Repealing Title 1, Chapter 8, Article E, Meridian City Code; Amending Meridian City Code Section 1-9-3(G) (7), Regarding Compensation Changes; Amending Meridian City Code Section 1-813-2, Regarding Duties of the (--hir-f Finnnriril nffir-Pr nnrl Prnvirlinn nn FffPrtivP r)ntr�,, MEETING NOTES Cv� I I M,� -r(-) AIV D11 �q p Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION 6E DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, MILAM, PALMER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 1-8-1, REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS BY MAYOR; REPEALING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE E, MERIDIAN CITY CODE; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 1-9-3(G)(7), REGARDING COMPENSATION CHANGES; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 1-813-2, REGARDING DUTIES OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to her authority under Idaho Code section 50-602, the Mayor, as the chief administrative official of the City of Meridian, and superintendent of all the officers of the city of Meridian, recommends the following changes to the structure of City departments, for the effective administration and operation of the City of Meridian; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian finds that the following changes to the structure of City departments, as recommended by the Mayor, reflect an effective internal structure and such changes will best serve the public interest; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: Section 1. That Meridian City Code section 1-8-1 shall be amended as follows: 1-8-1: APPOINTMENTS BY MAYOR: A. The mayor, with the consent of the city council, shall appoint the following department officials of the city of Meridian_ including city attorney, public works director, chief of police, fire chief, community development director, parks and recreation director, and support services director- chief financial officer/information services director (city treasurer). The mayor,, with the consent of the city council= may add or change other appointed positions as necessary to effectively operate the city. B. Pursuant to the Idaho Code the mayor with the consent of the city council shall appoint a chief financial ,. ffteer4eity t .east ,.o, and city clerk. Section 2. That Title 1, Chapter 8, Article E shall be repealed. Section 3. That Meridian City Code section 1-9-3(G)(7) shall be amended as follows: 1-9-3: BUDGET POLICY: G. Budget Development: UPDATE TO SUPPORT SERVICES DIRECTOR AND CFO PROVISIONS PAGE I OF 4 7. Compensation Changes: Approved compensation changes shall be communicated to the finance department for inclusion in the draft budget through the human resources department. If a new job classification is created the job description must be submitted to the human resources manager for approval and salary classification. Section 4. That Meridian City Code section 1-813-2 shall be amended as follows: 1-811-2: DUTIES: The chief financial officer/city treasurer shall have and fulfill all of the duties established by Idaho Code as they may pertain to the city treasurer or the finances of the city, including, without limitation, those duties enumerated in title 18, chapter 57 (public funds and securities); title 50, chapter 2 (city treasurer); title 50, chapter 10 (city finances); title 57, chapter 1 (public depository law); and title 67, chapter 4 (annual audit) of Idaho Code. Additionally, the chief financial officer/city treasurer shall: A. Attend, as necessary, meetings of the city council. B. Implement financial policies and plans at the direction of the mayor and city council. C. Advise the mayor and city council on financial policy considerations, and short and long range financial planning. D. Review and analyze financial methods and performance to fmd ways to increase effectiveness, improve results or affect economies in financial activities. E. Analyze budget requests for compliance with appropriate rules, regulations, policies, procedures, budget, and capital improvement plan. F. Develop with the necessary staff, the annual budget amendment, including gathering all data, analyzing results and presenting a final report to the mayor, council and the public. (Ord. 16- 1680, 4-5-2016) G. Manage the city's investment portfolio. H. Establish and maintain an internal control structure designed to protect the city from loss of public funds due to fraud, error, or actions inconsistent with the requirements of the laws governing allowable public entity investments. I. Monitor the financial condition of the city and adherence to the budget. J. Ensure the city's budget, financial results, financial transactions, budget calendar, revenue manual, budget development manual, capital improvement plan, annual audit report, and audited financial statements are available to the public. UPDATE TO SUPPORT SERVICES DIRECTOR AND CFO PROVISIONS PAGE 2 OF 4 K. oche Supervise manage and oversee the various departments of city clerk, information technology, and finance departments and delegate or assign duties or tasks as required for the efficient operation of the dept departments and fulfillment of the requirements of this code and other law. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. 2017. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 2017. APPROVED: Tammy de Weerd Mayor ATTEST: C.Jay Coles City Clerk day of September, day of September, UPDATE TO SUPPORT SERVICES DIRECTOR AND CFO PROVISIONS PAGE 3 OF 4 NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 1-8-1, REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS BY MAYOR; REPEALING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE E, MERIDIAN CITY CODE; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 1-9-3(G)(7), REGARDING COMPENSATION CHANGES; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 1-811-2, REGARDING DUTIES OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City of Meridian Mayor and City Council By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk First Reading: Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-902: YES NO Second Reading: Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 17 - The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance no. 17- of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A(3). DATED this day of 32017. William. L.M. Nary City Attorney UPDATE TO SUPPORT SERVICES DIRECTOR AND CFO PROVISIONS PAGE 4 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6F PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Community Development/Building Services Division: Emissions Testing Facilities - Permitting Recommendation MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Presentation to Meridian City Council November 14, 2017 Brent Bjornson, Building Official Permitting Emissions Testing Facilities Issue Emissions testing facilities in small, accessory buildings at gas stations Less than 120 square feet Underground electrical wiring No foundation Challenge: Can’t comply with standards for temporary use, because needs to be in place year-round (TUP is 120 days) Can’t comply with standards for permanent use, because IBC §1808 requires foundation (CoO requires IBC compliance) Problem Emissions testing facilities in accessory buildings (with no foundation, <120sf, year-round) do not comply with TUP code, IBC, or UDC Possible solutions: 1.Cite existing and disallow new ETSs in accessory buildings •Pros: Removes ambiguity, changes aesthetic landscape •Cons: Decreases availability of service needed by citizens 2.Create new category of temporary use •Pros: ETSs subject to TUP standards •Cons: 365 days ≠ temporary; creates inconsistency with IBC §108 3.Expand exception to building permit requirement for <120sf accessory buildings to include ETSs •Pros: ETSs subject to UDC standards, eliminates foundation requirement, recognizes permanent nature of use •Cons: Aesthetic, safety issues associated with using temporary building for permanent use (largely resolved by host business) Recommended solution Expand IBC §105.2 exception to building permit requirement for <120sf accessory buildings to include emissions testing facilities: 105.2 Work exempt from permit. . . . Permits shall not be required for the following: Building: 1. One-story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses, emissions testing facilities, and similar uses, provided the floor area is not greater than 120 square feet. FAQ: Why is ETS different from TUPs? EMISSIONS TESTING STATIONS TEMPORARY SALES UNITS (e.g. sno-cone shack, fruit stand, Christmas tree lot) Provide a service that citizens are mandated by law to obtain Provide goods or services not mandated by law “Public use” per UDC “Temporary use” per City Code Accessory building owned by tenant is common model for ETSs; rare for ETSs to be available inside service stations Accessory building is one of many options for TSUs ETSs are accessory to permanent proprietor where they are located TSUs are not typically accessory to permanent proprietor Year-round demand by consumers and operators Seasonal demand by consumers and operators Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM TITLE: ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: Community Development/Planning Division: Idaho Avenue Amenities - Transfer of Ownership from Meridian Development Corporation to City of Meridian and Next Steps 1. Resolution No. 17-2)/'� 9: Joint Resolution of Meridian Development Corporation and City of Meridian Signifying Transfer by MDC and Acceptance by City of Idaho Avenue Decks, Planters, and Bicycle Rack MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION 6G DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS November 8, 2017 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members CC: City Clerk FROM: Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager RE: Idaho Avenue Streetscape Improvements November 14, 2017 City Council Workshop Item In 2015, the City and MDC agreed to jointly fund interim streetscape improvements on Idaho Avenue, between Main Street and 2 nd Street. The City and MDC each spent approximately $12,000 on decking, planters and other improvements on this block. While the agencies partnered on the project, ownership was never addressed. On November 8th , the MDC Board voted to approve a Joint Resolution that turns over their interest in the decks, planters and bicycle rack to the City. The City Council is being asked to approve the Joint Resolution transferring MDC ownership to the City on November 14 th . The Idaho Avenue Rightsizing (or Placemaking) project was intended to be a temporary installation, somewhat mimicking a potential long-term cross-section for the block that “activates” the street and improves opportunities for adjacent businesses. Recently, some of the business owners on this block have questioned how successful this project has been. Further, they’ve recently noted that the street sweepers are not able to pick up the leaves due to the decks and planters. They are concerned that the leaves will block the gutters under the decks and create a drainage issue when it rains and snows. City Staff recently met with Nick Grove, the MDBA President to discuss these issues (maintenance/leaves and the worth of streetscape elements.) The MDBA, in association with MDC and Community Development Staff, is going to host a meeting with the property and business owners on this block on Monday, November 20 th at 3 pm at Meridian City Hall to discuss Idaho Avenue. As Council considers accepting 100% ownership of the planters and decks, Staff wanted to make you aware that these discussions were going on. Further, Staff would like to get feedback from Council on these issues. As Staff sees it there are several options, some requiring more resources than others: 1) Leave as-is (do nothing); 2) Leave as-is, but do seasonal leaf blowing under decks; 3) Remove some of the decking and planters (allows businesses like Paulie’s to have outdoor dining); 4) Remove decks and planters and store during winter months and replace during spring and summer; 5) Remove decks and planters and go back to the way things were before the installation; 6) Remove and relocate the decks and planters somewhere else in downtown; and, 7) Other. CITY OF MERIDIAN BY THE CITY COUNCIL: MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 17 - BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS RESOLUTION NO. 17- BASALONE, BEVAN, BIRD, DE WEERD, McCARVEL, MUELLER, RITTER, VLASSEK, WINDER A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SIGNIFYING TRANSFER BY MDC AND ACCEPTANCE OF OWNERSHIP BY CITY OF IDAHO AVENUE DECKS, PLANTERS, AND BICYCLE RACK, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, City and MDC are mutually interested in enhancing the Meridian community's quality of life and stimulating economic development in the urban renewal area; WHEREAS, to these ends both parties invested in the purchase and construction of decks, planters, and a bicycle rack ("Amenities"), set along the curbs of Idaho Avenue, to extend pedestrian and seating areas and beautify downtown Meridian, as proposed by the Meridian Downtown Business Association ("MDBA"); WHEREAS, pursuant to a Cooperative Agreement executed by MDBA and MDC on February 24, 2016, ("February 24, 2016 Cooperative Agreement"), MDBA agreed to care for the vegetation in the planters until released of such obligation by MDC, and accepted other rights and responsibilities regarding the planters, which agreement and all attendant rights and responsibilities will be extinguished upon City's acceptance of ownership of the Amenities; WHEREAS, by this resolution, the Board of Commissioners of the Meridian Development Corporation seeks to transfer ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the Amenities to City; WHEREAS, by this resolution, the City Council of the City of Meridian seeks to accept, on behalf of the City, ownership of the Amenities; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties agree as follows: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That by this instrument, MDC hereby transfers ownership of the Amenities to the City of Meridian. RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP OF DECKS AND PLANTERS FROM MDC TO CITY PAGE I Section 2. That by this instrument the City of Meridian hereby accepts ownership of the Amenities from MDC. Section 3. That it is understood by the parties that upon adoption and approval of this resolution, City's ownership rights and responsibilities shall be exclusive, and shall include the authority to make all decisions regarding maintenance, location, replacement, and/or retention of the Amenities, in City's sole discretion; Section 4. That, within thirty (30) days of the adoption and approval of this resolution, MDC shall deliver to MDBA written notice of the termination of the February 24, 2016 Cooperative Agreement between MDC and MDBA, the release of MDBA's obligation to care for the vegetation in the planters, and of the transfer of ownership of the Amenities to City. Section 5. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval by the respective boards of MDC and City. ADOPTED by the Board of Commissioners of the Meridian Development Corporation on the day of , 2017. APPROVED by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the Meridian Development Corporation on this day of , 2017. APPROVED: CC Dan Basalone, Chairman Meridian Development Corporation ATTEST: B L./ Y� Nathan Mueller, Secretary/Treasurer Meridian Development Corporation ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this .2017. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 2017. APPROVED: Tammy de Weerd, Mayor ATTEST: ME day of day of C.Jay Coles, City Clerk RFQnTITTIOWTRANCFFRRTN( (1\TJNFRCFi1PfIFTll+'(KCANTIPi ANTPPQT:R/lA4NAT) ,Tol(,TTV pAt-Pi Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6H PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Parks Department: South Meridian Regional Park Update MEETING NOTES i�� Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS South Meridian Regional Park Update City Council Presentation November 14, 2017 Mike Barton, MPR Parks Superintendent Public Meetings / Outreach Process Park System Master Plan, Surveys, Focus Groups, Public Meetings – 2015 Town Hall Meeting –August 2016 Parks & Recreation Commission – November 2016, January 2017, March 2017, July 2017 City Council Presentations – December 2016, May 2017 Neighborhood Public Meeting – June 2017 Current Design Based on Public Outreach Discovery Theme Two Lit Softball Fields Open Grass Restroom/Concession Playground Splash Pad Sand/Water Play Budget Approved Budget ~ FY2016 $ 750,000 Phase 1 Construction Documents Pre-Construction Costs Approved Budget ~ FY2017 $6,000,000 Phase 1 Construction Documents Total Budget $6,750,000 Construction Estimates / Value Engineering Estimates/Base Bid Schematic Design 5/26/17 $13,000,000 Design Development 6/1/17 $10,000,000 75% CDs 10/18/17 $ 7,500,000 100% CDs 11/5/17 $ 6,800,000 Bid Strategy Late Fall/Early Winter Bidding Advertise 11/17/17 Open Bids 12/12/17 Base Bid Add Alternates Softball Field Lighting Gravel Overflow Parking Additional Green Space ~ NE Corner Stage Picnic Shelter #2 Next Steps Budget Amendment from Impact Fees? Contract Award 12/19/17 3/1/18 Groundbreaking 10/30/18 Substantial Completion Summer 2018 Grand Opening Questions? Discussion? Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Fire Department: Bear Creek Park and Fire Station #6 Review of Actions and Decisions To Date and Outline for Community Outreach and Decision Process Moving Forward MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Action ITems A. Public Hearing Continued from June 6, 2017 for 2017 UDC Text Amendment (H-2017-0044) by City of Meridian Planning Division 1. Request: Text Amendment to Certain Sections of the UDC Pertaining to Definitions; Allowed Uses in all Districts; Specific Use Standards (Home Occupation and Retail Store, Wine and Beer Sales and Servings); Surety Agreements AND Establish New Definitions and Regulations to Allow the Operation of Food nnrl Rpyi- i(YP Prnrii ir-fc Prnr-Accinn Minnr in fhP C ommPrrinl MEETING NOTES Cotil'i e) tt De C&/? 62< 5-' -? / A/7 Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: November 14, 2017 Item # Project Number: Project Name: H-2017-0044 LL UDC Text Amendment Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (Y/N) r � CIO ro/ ,\ k --y7103 �a "J ©M✓V d pb C_ J Ih11'r 1 November 8, 2017 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members CC: City Clerk FROM: Caleb Hood, Planning Division Manager RE: Unified Development Code (UDC) Text Amendment – H-2017-0044 November 14, 2017 City Council Workshop Agenda Item On June 6 th , Staff presented proposed changes to several sections of the Unified Development Code (UDC), Title 11 of Meridian City Code. Staff from Planning, Legal, Building and Code Enforcement primarily, collaborated on the proposed UDC changes. The proposed UDC changes were shared with the UDC Focus Group and the Building Contractors Association of Southwest Idaho before submittal, with no comments received back. However, days prior to the June 6 th hearing, several letters of concern were received from the public. During the hearing, the Council discussed a tiered approach, or hierarchy of home-based businesses, with the potential to address direct sales/marketing differently than other accessory uses. The Council continued the hearing to November 14 th and directed staff to establish a stakeholder group of approximately 10-15 people, to discuss home-based businesses. As directed, City Staff contacted several of the parties that were present for the June 6 th meeting, inviting them to participate in developing standards that are intended to uphold the integrity of residential neighborhoods while allowing home-based businesses. Invited were: Eric Ritter, Jeff Todd, Mindy Lin, Ryan Cardoza, Eric Wallentine, Carolyn Smith, Kevin and Becky Preece, Shyrel and Norm Stoddard, Soren Dorius, Luke Cavener, Emily Kane, Lacy Ooi, Bill Parsons, Emily Kane, Robert Simison, and Caleb Hood. Not all of those invited were able to participate. However, for those that weren’t present at the in-person meetings, a summary e-mail was prepared and communication about the status and next steps shared electronically. The workgroup met three times: July 18 th , August 30 th and September 28 th . Attached are the updated UDC changes City Staff is requesting be codified. The changes attached affect several sections of the UDC, not all of them related to home occupations. However, the changes proposed that do affect home occupations were developed, vetted and endorsed by the established workgroup. The workgroup spent a majority of the time discussing section 11-4-3-21 of the UDC. 2 The subject application is meant to serve several purposes: 1) Establish a clear procedure for approving, revoking, modifying and denying an accessory use permit (aka – home occupation); 2) Modify and add definitions to Chapter 1 of the UDC for several uses; 3) Clarify the requirements for permitted, prohibited and accessory uses in the zoning districts in Chapter 2; 4) Modify the specific use standards of food products processing, accessory uses, home occupations and retail stores, wine and beer sales and servings in Chapter 4 of the UDC; 5) Restructure and re-ordering the existing surety and occupancy verbiage in Chapter 5 (11-5C- 3) to improve the administration of this section; and, 6) Incorporate new standards to allow for the establishment of food and beverage products processing, minor. Staff will provide an overview of the proposed UDC changes during the November 14 th meeting. Staff is requesting that the Council receive this update and continue the hearing one more time so everyone can have a chance to review and provide feedback before an action is taken. 3 P r op o s e d U DC T e xt A m en d m e n t s U D C S e c ti o n To p i c P ro b l e m /Q u es t i o n Po t e n ti a l F i x 11 - 1 - 1 1 D P r o c e s s f o r r e v o c a t i o n o f ac c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t Ci t y C o u n c i l h a s p r i m a r y j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r t h e q u e s ti o n o f w h e t h e r t o re v o k e a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t s ; t h i s s h o u l d b e a d i r e ct o r - l e v e l d e c i s i o n , wi t h a p p e a l t o C i t y C o u n c i l . D. R e v o c a t i o n o f C o n d i t i o n a l U s e O r A c c e s s o r y U s e P e r m i t : 1. A c o n d i t i o n a l u s e o r a c c e s s o r y u s e pe r m i t m a y b e r e v o k e d o r m o d i f i e d b y t h e c i t y c o u n c il, upon notice and hearing, for breach or violatio n of any co n d i t i o n o f a p p r o v a l o r l i m i t a t i o n o f t h e p e r m i t . 2. I f t h e c i t y c o u n c i l d e c i d e s t o r e v o k e a c o n d i t i o na l u s e p e r m i t or accessory use permit , either on its own action or upon complaint to the city council, th e c o u n c i l s h a l l n o t i f y t h e p e r m i t h o l d e r o f i t s i nt e n t i o n t o r e v o k e t h e p e r m i t a n d p r o v i d e t h e p e r m i t holder with the opportunity to contest the re v o c a t i o n at a p u b l i c h e a r i n g b e f o r e t h e C i t y C o u n c i l . 3. F i f t e e n ( 1 5 ) d a y s ' p r i o r n o t i c e o f t h e h e a r i n g s ha l l b e g i v e n t o t h e p e r m i t h o l d e r a n d a l l p r o p e r t y owners within three hundred feet (300') of the bo u n d a r i e s o f t h e l a n d f o r w h i c h t h e p e r m i t w a s i s s ue d . 4. T h e c i t y c o u n c i l s h a l l m a k e f i n d i n g s o f f a c t a n d c o n c l u s i o n s o f l a w s u p p o r t i n g i t s d e c i s i o n t o r e v o ke the conditional use or accessory use permit . If th e c o u n c i l d o e s n o t d e c i d e t o r e v o k e t h e p e r m i t , n o f i n d i n g s o f f a c t a n d c o n c l u s i o n s o f l a w s h a l l b e made. 5. A n a g g r i e v e d p e r m i t h o l d e r o r c o m p l a i n a n t m a y a p pe a l t h e d e c i s i o n o f t h e c i t y c o u n c i l u n d e r t h e a d m inistrative procedures act of the state of Id a h o , I d a h o C o d e s e c t i o n 6 7 - 5 2 7 0 . 11 - 1 - 1 1 E P r o c e s s f o r r e v o c a t i o n , mo d i f i c a t i o n , o r d e n i a l o f ac c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t Al l o w s d i r e c t o r t o d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r t o r e v o k e a c c e ss o r y u s e pe r m i t , w i t h o p t i o n t o a p p e a l t o C i t y C o u n c i l . E. R e v o c a t i o n , m o d i f i c a t i o n , o r d e n i a l o f a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t : 1. A n a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t m a y b e r e v o k e d o r m o d i f i ed b y t h e d i r e c t o r u p o n a f i n d i n g o f b r e a c h o r v i o l ation of any condition of approval or limitation of t h e p e r m i t . A n a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t a p p l i c a t i o n m a y b e d e n i e d b y t h e d i r e c t o r u p o n a f i n d i n g t h a t the proposed use cannot or will not be co n d u c t e d i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h a p p l i c a b l e s p e c i f i c u s e s t a n d a r d s . T h e d i r e c t o r s h a l l p r o v i d e t h e p e r m i t holder written notice of the revocation, mo d i f i c a t i o n , o r d e n i a l , a n d s h a l l p r o v i d e t h e p e r m it h o l d e r w i t h i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e o p p o r t u n i t y to appeal such action. 2. T h e p e r m i t h o l d e r o r a p p l i c a n t m a y a p p e a l t h e d i re c t o r ’ s r e v o c a t i o n , m o d i f i c a t i o n , o r d e n i a l o f a n accessory use permit. Such appeal shall be made in w r i t i n g , s h a l l s t a t e t h e r e a s o n s f o r s u c h a p p e a l , a n d s h a l l b e d e l i v e r e d t o t h e c i t y c l e r k v i a U . S . mail or in person within fourteen (14) days of suc h re v o c a t i o n , m o d i f i c a t i o n , o r d e n i a l . U p o n r e c e i p t o f s u c h w r i t t e n a p p e a l , t h e c i t y c l e r k s h a l l s c h e d u l e a public hearing on the appeal at a city council me e t i n g w i t h i n t h i r t y ( 3 0 ) d a y s . T h e c l e r k s h a l l p ro v i d e f i f t e e n ( 1 5 ) d a y s ’ n o t i c e o f t h e h e a r i n g t o the permit holder or applicant and all property ow n e r s w i t h i n t h r e e h u n d r e d f e e t ( 3 0 0 ' ) o f t h e b o u n da r i e s o f t h e l a n d f o r w h i c h t h e p e r m i t w a s i s s u e d . 3. F o l l o w i n g p u b l i c h e a r i n g o n t h e a p p e a l , c i t y c o u nc i l s h a l l a f f i r m , m o d i f y , o r r e v e r s e t h e d i r e c t o r ’ s action and shall issue written findings supportin g su c h d e c i s i o n . T h e c i t y c o u n c i l ' s d e c i s i o n o n s u c h ap p e a l s h a l l b e a f i n a l d e c i s i o n . 11 - 1 A - 1 D e f i n e a c c e s s o r y u s e F u r t h e r d e f i n e t h i s t e rm . AC C E S S O R Y U S E , N O N - R E S I D E N T I A L : A u s e o r a c t i v i t y th a t i s i n c i d e n t a l a n d secondary subordinate to the principal use and is conducted upon the sa m e p r o p e r t y . 11 - 1 A - 1 D e f i n e b r e w e r y N e w t e r m BR E W E R Y : T h e u s e o f a s i t e t h a t m a n u f a c t u r e s b e e r o r m a l t l i q u o r . T h e u s e m a y i n c l u d e t h e a n c i l l a r y s a le or dispensing of beer or malt liquor by the dr i n k o r g l a s s . 11 - 1 A - 1 D e f i n e d i r e c t s a l e s N e w t e r m DI R E C T S A L E S : T h e s a l e , d i s t r i b u t i o n , p r e s e n t a t i o n , d e m o n s t r a t i o n , o r s u p p l y o f g o o d s d i r e c t l y t o c o n s umers from the fabricator or producer of such go o d s t h r o u g h i n d e p e n d e n t c o n s u l t a n t s , a g e n t s , o r c on t r a c t o r s . 11 - 1 A - 1 D e f i n e d i s t i l l e r y N e w t e r m DI S T I L L E R Y : T h e u s e o f a s i t e t h a t m a n u f a c t u r e s d i s ti l l e d b e v e r a g e s . T h e u s e m a y i n c l u d e t h e a n c i l l a r y sale or dispensing of liquor by the drink or glass . 11 - 1 A - 1 D r i n k i n g e s t a b l i s h m e n t R e m o v e t h e t e r m b r e w er y f r o m t h e d e f i n i t i o n . DR I N K I N G E S T A B L I S H M E N T : T h e u s e o f a s i t e p r i m a r i l y f o r t h e s a l e o r d i s p e n s i n g o f a l c o h o l b y t h e d r i n k or glass. Th ise use includes, but is not limited to , is c o m m o n l y r e f e r r e d t o a s a b a r , b r e w e r y , lo u n g e , n i g h t c l u b , a n d t a v e r n . 11 - 1 A - 1 F o o d p r o d u c t s p r o c e s s i n g B i f u r c a t e f o o d a n d b e v e r a g e p r o d u c t s p r o c e s s i n g i n t o t w o ( 2 ) se p a r a t e c a t e g o r i e s ; m a j o r o r m i n o r s i m i l a r t o t h e UD C v e h i c l e r e p a i r de f i n i t i o n . FO O D AN D B E V E R A G E PR O D U C T S P R O C E S S I N G ; MA J O R ( N A I C S C o d e 3 1 1 ) : T h e u s e o f a s i t e f o r p r o d u c i n g , manufacturing, processing or storage of fo o d p r o d u c t s . T h e u s e i n c l u d e s , b u t i s n o t l i m i t e d t o , b e v e r a g e s , c o f f e e , i c e , s n a c k s , f r u i t s , v e g e t a bles, spices, confectionery, and dairy products. Ex c l u d e d u s e s a r e a n i m a l p r o d u c t s , s e a f o o d , m i l l i n g a n d r e f i n i n g . 11 - 1 A - 1 D e f i n e f o o d a n d b e v e r a g e pr o d u c t s p r o c e s s i n g ; mi n o r Ne w t e r m FO O D A N D B E V E R A G E P R O D U C T S P R O C E S S I N G ; M I N O R : T h e u s e of a site or portion thereof for small scale oper ation of producing; manufacturing; pr o c e s s i n g a n d s t o r a g e o f f o o d a n d b e v e r a g e p r o d u c t s. T h e u s e m u s t c o n t a i n a t a s t i n g r o o m , d i n i n g a r e a , retail showroom or any combination of th e s e a r e a s . T h e t e r m i n c l u d e s b r e w e r y ; d i s t i l l e r y an d w i n e r y . A u s e t h a t d o e s n o t m e e t t h e s p e c i f i c u se standards listed in Chapter 4 shall be defined as F o o d a n d B e v e r a g e P r o d u c t s P r o c e s s i n g , M a j o r . 4 11 - 1 A - 1 D e f i n e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n M o d i f y t h e t e r m h o m e o c c u p a t i o n . AC C E S S O R Y U S E , H O M E O C C U P A T I O N : A n oc c u p a t i o n , p r o f e s s i o n , a c t i v i t y , or use or activity that is clearly an incidental and secondary use of to a r e s i d e n t i a l d w e l l i n g u n i t . a n d t h a t d o e s n o t a l t e r t h e e x t e r i o r o f t h e p r o p e rty or affect the residential character of the neig hborhood. This term sh a l l n o t i n c l u d e “ D a y c a r e F a c i l i t y ” a s h e r e i n d e f i ne d . 11 - 1 A - 1 I n d u s t r y , h e a v y M i n o r r e v i s i o n t o t h e e x i s t in g d e f i n i t i o n . IN D U S T R Y , H E A V Y : A . A u s e e n g a g e d i n t h e b a s i c p r o c es s i n g a n d m a n u f a c t u r i n g o f m a t e r i a l s o r p r o d u c t s , predominately from extracted or raw ma t e r i a l s ; B. A u s e e n g a g e d i n s t o r a g e o r m a n u f a c t u r i n g p r o c e s se s u s i n g f l a m m a b l e o r e x p l o s i v e m a t e r i a l s ; C. S t o r a g e o r m a n u f a c t u r i n g p r o c e s s e s t h a t p o t e n t i a ll y i n v o l v e h a z a r d o u s o r c o m m o n l y r e c o g n i z e d o f f e n s ive conditions. Included uses are animal pr o d u c t s , s e a f o o d , m i l l i n g a n d r e f i n i n g . 11 - 1 A - 1 D e f i n e p e r s o n a l a n d pr o f e s s i o n a l s e r v i c e s Mo d i f y t h e c u r r e n t t e r m o f p e r s o n a l a n d p r o f e s s i o n a l s e r v i c e s . PE R S O N A L A N D P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S : T h e u s e o f a s i t e f o r t h e p r o v i s i o n o f i n d i v i d u a l i z e d s e r v i c e s g e n e rally related to personal needs. Personal se r v i c e u s e s i n c l u d e , b u t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o , b e a u t y a n d h e a l t h c a r e s e r v i c e s s u c h a s s a l o n s , h a i r , n a i l and skin care, spa, and barbers; fitness training an d i n s t r u c t i o n ; l o c k s m i t h s ; a n d r e p a i r s s u c h a s f o o t w e a r a n d l e a t h er goods, and watches. Professional service uses in clude, bu t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o : a r c h i t e c t s , l a n d s c a p e a r c h i te c t s a n d o t h e r d e s i g n s e r v i c e s ; c o m p u t e r d e s i g n e r s ; consultants; lawyers; media advisors; ph o t o g r a p h y s t u d i o s ; f i t n e s s t r a i n e r s ; a n d t i t l e c o m p a n i e s . T h e t e r m d o e s n o t i n c l u d e h e a lthcare and social service. 11 - 1 A - 1 R e s t a u r a n t M i n o r r e v i s i o n t o t h e e x i s t i n g d ef i n i t i o n . RE S T A U R A N T : A . T h e u s e o f a s i t e f o r t h e p r i m a r y p u rp o s e o f f o o d p r e p a r a t i o n , h a v i n g a c o m m e r c i a l k i t c hen and cooking facilities, and where meals ar e r e g u l a r l y s e r v e d t o t h e p u b l i c f o r c o m p e n s a t i o n . T h e u s e i n c l u d e s , b u t i s n o t l i m i t e d t o , c a f e , c o ffee shop, delicatessen, diner, eatery, grill, pizz a pa r l o r , r e s t a u r a n t , r e t a i l b a k e r y , s u s h i b a r , s t e a k ho u s e . B. E s t a b l i s h m e n t s w i t h a l i q u o r an d / o r b e e r a n d w i n e l i c e n s e t h a t i n c l u d e s a r e s t a u r a n t c e r t i f i c a t e a n d that meet the definition of restaurant as set fo r t h i n I d a h o a d m i n i s t r a t i v e c o d e 1 1 . 0 5 . 0 1 . 0 1 0 . 0 74 . C. E s t a b l i s h m e n t s w i t h a b e e r a n d w i n e l i c e n s e t h a t m e e t t h e d e f i n i t i o n o f r e s t a u r a n t a s s e t f o r t h i n Idaho administrative code 11.05.01.010.04, in c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , b r e w p u b s a n d w i n e b a rs . 11 - 1 A - 1 D e f i n e r e t a i l s a l e s N e w t e r m RE T A I L S A L E S : T h e s a l e , d i s t r i b u t i o n , p r e s e n t a t i o n , d e m o n s t r a t i o n , o r s u p p l y o f g o o d s t o c o n s u m e r s t h r ough or at a retail store. 11 - 1 A - 1 R e t a i l s t o r e , w i n e a n d be e r s a l e s a n d s e r v i n g s Mi n o r r e v i s i o n t o t h e e x i s t i n g d e f i n i t i o n . RE T A I L S T O R E , W I N E A N D B E E R S A L E S A N D S E R V I N G S : T h e use of a site that offers wine and/or beer to the p ublic for monetary compensation for of f - s i t e c o n s u m p t i o n a s w e l l a s a n d of f e r s s e r v i n g s o f s u c h f o r p u r c h a s e b y t h e b o t t l e or glass. The use includes, but is not limited to, wine shops and br e w i n g s u p p l y s t o r e s . T h e u s e d o e s n o t i n c l u d e , b r e w e r y , d i s t i l l e r y , drinking establishment s, or restaurant s or winery as herein defined. The use do e s n o t i n c l u d e s t o r e s t h a t s e l l w i n e a n d b e e r b u t d o n o t o f f e r s e r v i n g s . 11 - 1 A - 1 D e f i n e W i n e r y N e w t e r m WI N E R Y : T h e u s e o f a s i t e t h a t m a n u f a c t u r e s a l c o h o l ic b e v e r a g e s f r o m t h e f e r m e n t e d j u i c e o f g r a p e s , f r uits, or other liquid bearing plants. The use ma y i n c l u d e t h e a n c i l l a r y s a l e o r d i s p e n s i n g o f w i n e b y t h e d r i n k o r g l a s s . 11 - 2 A - 2 A A l l o w e d u s e s C l a r i f y w h e n a n A U P o r C Z C i s r e q u i r e d f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g h o m e oc c u p a t i o n a n d n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t s i n t h e re s i d e n t i a l z o n i n g d i s t r i c t s . A. P e r m i t t e d u s e s a n d a c c e s s o r y u s e s i n r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t s s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d i n a c c o r d w i t h c h a p t e r s 2, “District Regulations”, 3, "Regulations Ap p l y i n g T o A l l D i s t r i c t s " , 4 , " S p e c i f i c U s e S t a n d a rd s " , a n d 5 , " A d m i n i s t r a t i o n " , o f t h i s t i t l e . , except that single-family detached homes and secondary dw e l l i n g s s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d i n a c c o r d w i t h t h e s t a n da r d s e s t a b l i s h e d i n t i t l e 1 0 o f t h i s c o d e . A n y p e r son establishing, operating, or carrying on a home oc c u p a t i o n o r f a m i l y d a y c a r e i n a r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r ic t s h a l l o b t a i n a n a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t p r i o r t o e stablishing, operating, or c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . A n y p e r s o n e s t a b l i s h i n g , o pe r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n a n y o t h e r p e r m i t t e d a n d / o r accessory use in a residential district shall ob t a i n a c e r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c o m p l i a n c e p r i o r t o es t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e , e xcept that single-family detached homes and se c o n d a r y d w e l l i n g s s h a l l n o t r e q u i r e c e r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c o m p l i a n c e a n d / o r a c c e s s o r y u s e a p p r o v a l . Standards within this title related to such uses sh a l l b e r e v i e w e d i n t h e c o u r s e o f t h e b u i l d i n g p e r mi t p r o c e s s . It shall be unlawful and a violation of the unified development code for any person to co n d u c t i n a r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t a n y p e r m i t t e d o r ac c e s s o r y u s e u n l e s s s u c h p e r s o n f i r s t o b t a i n s e a c h and every applicable permit from the city. 1. S i n g l e - f a m i l y d e t a c h e d h o m e s , s i n g l e f a m i l y a t t a ch e d h o m e s , t o w n h o m e s a n d s e c o n d a r y d w e l l i n g s s h a l l be reviewed in accord with the standards es t a b l i s h e d i n t i t l e 1 0 o f t h i s c o d e a n d s h a l l n o t re q u i r e c e r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c o m p l i a n c e a n d / o r a c c essory use approval. 2. T h e o p e r a t o r o f a h o m e o c c u p a t i o n a c c e s s o r y u s e o r f a m i l y d a y c a r e i n a r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t s h a l l obtain an accessory use permit prior to es t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . T he d i r e c t o r s h a l l d e n y a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a h o m e o c cupation accessory use upon a finding that such us e c a n n o t o r w i l l n o t b e c o n d u c t e d i n c o m p l i a n c e w it h a p p l i c a b l e s p e c i f i c u s e s t a n d a r d s . S u c h f i n d i n g may be based on the inherent nature of the us e , t h e p r o p o s e d m a n n e r o f t h e u s e , o r t h e m a n n e r of t h e u s e a s p r e v i o u s l y c o n d u c t e d b y t h e a p p l i c a n t . 3. A n y o t h e r p e r m i t t e d a n d / o r n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l a c c e s so r y u s e i n a r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t s h a l l o b t a i n a c ertificate of zoning compliance prior to es t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . 5 Ta b l e 1 1 - 2 A - 2 A l l o w e d u s e s i n t h e re s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t s In c l u d e d i r e c t s a l e s a s a n a l l o w e d u s e i n t h e r e s i d en t i a l d i s t r i c t s . TABLE 11-2A-2 AL L O W E D U S E S I N T H E R E S I D E N T I A L D I S T R I C T S Us e R - 2 R-4 R-8 R-15 R-40 Da y c a r e c e n t e r 1 - C C P P Da y c a r e , f a m i l y 1 - A A A C Da y c a r e , g r o u p 1 - - C P P Di r e c t s a l e s A A A A A Dw e l l i n g , s e c o n d a r y 1 A A A A A Ho m e o c c u p a t i o n , a c c e s s o r y u s e 1 A A A A A 11 - 2 B - 2 A A l l o w e d u s e s C l a r i f y w h e n a n A U P o r C Z C i s r e q u i r e d f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g h o m e oc c u p a t i o n a n d n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t s i n t h e co m m e r c i a l z o n i n g d i s t r i c t s . A. P e r m i t t e d u s e s a n d a c c e s s o r y u s e s i n c o m m e r c i a l di s t r i c t s s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d i n a c c o r d w i t h c h a p t e r s 2, “District Regulations”, 3, "Regulations Ap p l y i n g T o A l l D i s t r i c t s " , 4 , " S p e c i f i c U s e S t a n d a rd s " , a n d 5 , " A d m i n i s t r a t i o n " , o f t h i s t i t l e . Any person establishing, operating, or carrying on a home oc c u p a t i o n o r f a m i l y d a y c a r e i n a c o m m e r c i a l d i s t r i ct s h a l l o b t a i n a n a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t p r i o r t o e s tablishing, operating, or carrying on such use. An y p e r s o n e s t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n an y o t h e r p e r m i t t e d a n d / o r a c c e s s o r y u s e i n a c o m m e rcial district shall obtain a certificate of zo n i n g c o m p l i a n c e p r i o r t o e s t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . It shall be unlawful and a violation of the unifie d development code for an y p e r s o n t o c o n d u c t i n a c o m m e r c i a l d i s t r i c t a n y pe r m i t t e d o r a c c e s s o r y u s e u n l e s s s u c h p e r s o n f i r s t obtains each and every applicable permit from th e c i t y . 1. T h e o p e r a t o r o f a h o m e o c c u p a t i o n a c c e s s o r y u s e or f a m i l y d a y c a r e i n a c o m m e r c i a l d i s t r i c t s h a l l o b tain an accessory use permit prior to es t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . T he d i r e c t o r s h a l l d e n y a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a h o m e o c cupation accessory use upon a finding that such us e c a n n o t o r w i l l n o t b e c o n d u c t e d i n c o m p l i a n c e w it h a p p l i c a b l e s p e c i f i c u s e s t a n d a r d s . S u c h f i n d i n g may be based on the inherent nature of the us e , t h e p r o p o s e d m a n n e r o f t h e u s e , o r t h e m a n n e r of t h e u s e a s p r e v i o u s l y c o n d u c t e d b y t h e a p p l i c a n t . 2. A n y o t h e r p e r m i t t e d a n d / o r n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l a c c e ss o r y u s e i n a c o m m e r c i a l d i s t r i c t s h a l l o b t a i n a c ertificate of zoning compliance prior to es t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . 6 Ta b l e 1 1 - 2 B - 2 A l l o w e d u s e s i n t h e co m m e r c i a l d i s t r i c t s Al l o w s m a l l s c a l e o p e r a t i o n s o f f o o d a n d b e v e r a g e p ro d u c t s pr o c e s s i n g i n t h e c o m m e r c i a l d i s t r i c t s ; r e m o v e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n s fr o m o p e r a t i n g i n t h e L - O a n d C - N z o n i n g d i s t r i c t s be c a u s e r e s i d e n t i a l us e s a r e t y p i c a l l y n o t a l l o w e d i n t h e s e z o n i n g d i s t ri c t s a n d a d d r e t a i l sa l e s a s a n e w u s e t o t h e t a b l e . TABLE 11-2B-2 AL L O W E D U S E S I N T H E C O M M E R C I A L D I S T R I C T S Us e C - N C-C C-G L-O M-E H-E Fl e x s p a c e 1 - P P - P - Fo o d a n d b e v e r a g e p r o d u c t s p r o c e s s i n g ; m i n o r 1 P/C P/C P/C - P/C P/C Fu e l s a l e s f a c i l i t y 1 C P P - - C Fu e l s a l e s f a c i l i t y , t r u c k s t o p 1 - - C - - - He a l t h c a r e o r s o c i a l s e r v i c e s P P P P P P Ho m e o c c u p a t i o n , a c c e s s o r y u s e 1 A A A A - - Us e C - N C-C C-G L-O M-E H-E Re s t a u r a n t P P P C A A Re t a i l s a l e s P P P - A A Re t a i l s t o r e P P P - A A 11 - 2 C - 2 A A l l o w e d u s e s C l a r i f y w h e n a n A U P o r C Z C i s r e q u i r e d f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g h o m e oc c u p a t i o n a n d n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t s i n t h e in d u s t r i a l z o n i n g d i s t r i c t s . A. P e r m i t t e d u s e s a n d a c c e s s o r y u s e s i n i n d u s t r i a l di s t r i c t s s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d i n a c c o r d w i t h c h a p t e r s 2, “District Regulations”, 3, "Regulations Ap p l y i n g T o A l l D i s t r i c t s " , 4 , " S p e c i f i c U s e S t a n d a rd s " , a n d 5 , " A d m i n i s t r a t i o n " , o f t h i s t i t l e . Any person establishing, operating or carrying on any pe r m i t t e d a n d / o r a c c e s s o r y u s e i n a n i n d u s t r i a l d i s tr i c t , i n c l u d i n g a s i n g l e - f a m i l y d e t a c h e d d w e l l i n g used as a caretaker dwelling, shall obtain a ce r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c o m p l i a n c e p r i o r t o e s t a b l i s h in g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . It shall be unlawful and a violation of the unifie d de v e l o p m e n t c o d e f o r a n y p e r s o n t o c o n d u c t i n a n i n du s t r i a l d i s t r i c t a n y p e r m i t t e d o r a c c e s s o r y u s e u n less such person first obtains each and every ap p l i c a b l e p e r m i t f r o m t h e c i t y . 1. A n y p e r m i t t e d a n d / o r n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l a c c e s s o r y u se i n a n i n d u s t r i a l d i s t r i c t , i n c l u d i n g a s i n g l e - f a mily detached dwelling used as a caretaker dw e l l i n g , s h a l l o b t a i n a c e r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c o m p li a n c e p r i o r t o e s t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g on such use. Ta b l e 1 1 - 2 C - 2 A d d n e w u s e t o t a b l e A l l o w s m a l l s c a l e o p e r a t i o n s o f f o o d a n d b e v e r a g e p r o d u c t s pr o c e s s i n g i n t h e i n d u s t r i a l d i s t r i c t s . Table 11-2C-2 AL L O W E D U S E S I N T H E I N D U S T R I A L D I S T R I C T S Use I -L I -H Fo o d an d b e v e r a g e products processing; minor 1 P /C - Fo o d an d b e v e r a g e products processing ; major 1 P P 7 11 - 2 D - 2 A A l l o w e d u s e s C l a r i f y w h e n a n A U P o r C Z C i s r e q u i r e d f o r e s t a b l i s h i n g h o m e oc c u p a t i o n a n d n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t s i n t h e tr a d i t i o n a l n e i g h b o r h o o d z o n i n g d i s t r i c t s . A. P e r m i t t e d u s e s a n d a c c e s s o r y u s e s i n t r a d i t i o n a l n e i g h b o r h o o d d i s t r i c t s s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d i n a c c o r d with chapters 2, “District Regulations”, 3, " R e g u l a t i o n s A p p l y i n g T o A l l D i s t r i c t s " , 4 , " S p e ci f i c U s e S t a n d a r d s " , a n d 5 , " A d m i n i s t r a t i o n " , o f t his title . except that single-family detached homes an d s e c o n d a r y d w e l l i n g s s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d i n a c c o r d w i t h t h e s t a n d a r d s e s t a b l i s h e d i n t i t l e 1 0 o f t h i s code. Any person establishing, operating, or ca r r y i n g o n a h o m e o c c u p a t i o n o r f a m i l y d a y c a r e i n a t r a d i t i o n a l n e i g h b o r h o o d d i s t r i c t s h a l l o b t a i n a n accessory use permit prior to establishing, op e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . A n y p e r s o n e s t a bl i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n a n y o t h e r p e r m i tted and/or accessory use in a traditional ne i g h b o r h o o d d i s t r i c t s h a l l o b t a i n a c e r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c o m p l i a n c e p r i o r t o e s t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , or carrying on such use, except that single-famil y de t a c h e d h o m e s a n d s e c o n d a r y d w e l l i n g s s h a l l n o t r e qu i r e c e r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c o m p l i a n c e a n d / o r a c c e s sory use approval. Standards within this title re l a t e d t o s u c h u s e s s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d i n t h e c o u r s e o f t h e b u i l d i n g p e r m i t p r o c e s s . It shall be unlawful and a violation of the unified development co d e f o r a n y p e r s o n t o c o n d u c t i n a r e s i d e n t i a l d i s tr i c t a n y p e r m i t t e d o r a c c e s s o r y u s e u n l e s s s u c h p e rson first obtains each and every applicable pe r m i t f r o m t h e c i t y . 1. S i n g l e - f a m i l y d e t a c h e d h o m e s , s i n g l e - f a m i l y a t t a ch e d h o m e s , t o w n h o m e s a n d s e c o n d a r y d w e l l i n g s s h a l l be reviewed in accord with the standards es t a b l i s h e d i n t i t l e 1 0 o f t h i s c o d e a n d s h a l l n o t re q u i r e c e r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c o m p l i a n c e a n d / o r a c c essory use approval. 2. T h e o p e r a t o r o f a h o m e o c c u p a t i o n a c c e s s o r y u s e or f a m i l y d a y c a r e i n a t r a d i t i o n a l n e i g h b o r h o o d d i s trict shall obtain an accessory use permit prior to e s t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . T h e d i r e c t o r s h a l l d e n y a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a h o m e occupation accessory use upon a finding that su c h u s e c a n n o t o r w i l l n o t b e c o n d u c t e d i n c o m p l i a nc e w i t h a p p l i c a b l e s p e c i f i c u s e s t a n d a r d s . S u c h f inding may be based on the inherent nature of th e u s e , t h e p r o p o s e d m a n n e r o f t h e u s e , o r t h e m a n ne r o f t h e u s e a s p r e v i o u s l y c o n d u c t e d b y t h e a p p l i cant. 3. A n y o t h e r p e r m i t t e d a n d / o r n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l a c c e s so r y u s e i n a t r a d i t i o n a l n e i g h b o r h o o d d i s t r i c t s h a ll obtain a certificate of zoning compliance prior to e s t a b l i s h i n g , o p e r a t i n g , o r c a r r y i n g o n s u c h u s e . Ta b l e 1 1 - 2 D - 2 A l l o w e d u s e s i n t h e tr a d i t i o n a l n e i g h b o r h o o d di s t r i c t s Ad d a c c e s s o r y u s e a t t h e e n d o f h o m e o c c u p a t i o n f o r c o n s i s t e n c y th r o u g h - o u t t h e d o c u m e n t . TABLE 11-2D-2 AL L O W E D U S E S I N T H E T R A D I T O N A L N E I G H B O R H O O D D I S T R I C TS Use O-T TN-C TN-R Ho m e o c c u p a t i o n , accessory use 1 A A A 8 11 - 4 - 3 - 9 D a y c a r e f a c i l i t y M o d i f y d a y c a r e s t a n d a r d s t o c o i n c i d e w i t h t h e a c c e s s o r y u s e st a n d a r d s . A. G e n e r a l s t a n d a r d s f o r a l l c h i l d d a y c a r e a n d a d u l t c a r e u s e s , i n c l u d i n g t h e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s o f d a y c a re center; daycare, family; and daycare, group: 1. I n d e t e r m i n i n g t h e t y p e o f d a y c a r e f a c i l i t y , t h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f c h i l d r e n a t t h e f a c i l i t y a t o n e t i me, including the operator's children, is the de t e r m i n i n g f a c t o r . 2. O n s i t e v e h i c l e p i c k u p , p a r k i n g a n d t u r n a r o u n d ar e a s s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d t o e n s u r e s a f e d i s c h a r g e a n d pick up of clients. 3. T h e d e c i s i o n m a k i n g b o d y s h a l l s p e c i f y t h e m a x i m um n u m b e r o f a l l o w a b l e c l i e n t s a n d h o u r s o f o p e r a t i on as conditions of approval. 4. U p o n t e n t a t i v e a p p r o v a l o f t h e a p p l i c a t i o n b y t h e d i r e c t o r o r c o m m i s s i o n f o r a d a y c a r e c e n t e r f a c i l ity, the applicant or owner shall provide proof of cr i m i n a l b a c k g r o u n d c h e c k s a n d f i r e i n s p e c t i o n c e r t if i c a t e s a s r e q u i r e d b y t i t l e 3 9 , c h a p t e r 1 1 , I d a h o Code. Said proof shall be provided prior to is s u a n c e o f c e r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c o m p l i a n c e . T h e a pp l i c a n t o r o w n e r s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h a l l s t a t e o f I d aho and department of health and welfare re q u i r e m e n t s f o r d a y c a r e f a c i l i t i e s . 5. I n r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t s o r u s e s a d j o i n i n g a n a d ja c e n t r e s i d e n c e , t h e h o u r s o f o p e r a t i o n s h a l l b e b etween six o'clock (6:00) A.M. and eleven o'clock (1 1 : 0 0 ) P . M . T h i s s t a n d a r d m a y b e m o d i f i e d t h r o u g h ap p r o v a l o f a c o n d i t i o n a l u s e p e r m i t . 6. P r i o r t o s u b m i t t a l o f a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a n a c c e ss o r y d a y c a r e f a c i l i t y i n a r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t , t he applicant or owner shall hold a neighborhood me e t i n g i n a c c o r d w i t h s u b s e c t i o n 11 - 5 A - 6 C 1 1 - 5 A - 4 B o f t h i s t i t l e . Notice of the neighborhood meeting shall be provide d to all property owners of re c o r d w i t h i n o n e h u n d r e d f e e t ( 1 0 0 ' ) o f t h e e x t e r i or b o u n d a r y o f t h e s u b j e c t p r o p e r t y . Th e a p p l i c a n t s h a l l n o t e x c e e d t h e m a x i m u m n u m b e r o f c l i e n t s a s s t a t e d i n t h e a p p r o v e d p e r m i t o r a s s t ated in this title, whichever is more restrictive. B. A d d i t i o n a l s t a n d a r d s f o r d a y c a r e f a c i l i t i e s t h a t s e r v e c h i l d r e n : 1. A l l o u t d o o r p l a y a r e a s s h a l l b e c o m p l e t e l y e n c l o se d b y m i n i m u m s i x f o o t ( 6 ' ) n o n s c a l a b l e f e n c e s t o secure against exit/entry by small children and to s c r e e n a b u t t i n g p r o p e r t i e s . 2. O u t d o o r p l a y e q u i p m e n t o v e r s i x f e e t ( 6 ' ) h i g h s ha l l n o t b e l o c a t e d i n a f r o n t y a r d o r w i t h i n a n y r equired yard. 3. O u t d o o r p l a y a r e a s i n r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t s a d j a ce n t t o a n e x i s t i n g r e s i d e n c e s h a l l n o t b e u s e d a f t er dusk. C. A d d i t i o n a l s t a n d a r d s f o r f a m i l y d a y c a r e f a c i l i t i es c o n d u c t e d a s h o m e o c c u p a t i o n s accessory uses : 1. I n n o w a y s h a l l t h e f a m i l y d a y c a r e ca u s e t h e p r e m i s e s t o d i f f e r f r o m i t s r e s i d e n t i a l c haracter in the appearance, emit lighting, signs, or in the em i s s i o n o f no i s e , f u m e s , o d o r s , s m o k e , d u s t , v i b r a t i o n s , o r e l e c t r i c a l i n t e r f e r e n c e that can be observed outside the dwelling. A sign m ay be displayed fo r a d v e r t i s i n g t h e f a m i l y d a y c a r e f a c i l i t y i n a c c o rd w i t h t h e s t a n d a r d s s e t f o r t h i n U D C 1 1 - 3 D - 8 B . 2. O f f s t r e e t p a r k i n g s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d a s s e t f o r t h i n s e c t i o n 11-3C-6 of this title, in addition to the required off str eet parking for the dwelling. 11 - 4 - 3 - 1 9 Fo o d p r o d u c t s p r o c e s s i n g Ex i s t i n g s t a n d a r d s i n C h a p t e r 4 n e e d s t o b e r e - t i t l ed a s f o o d a n d be v e r a g e p r o d u c t s p r o c e s s i n g “ m a j o r ” . 11 - 4 - 3 - 1 9 : F O O D A N D B E V E R A G E P R O D U C T S P R O C E S S I N G ; MAJOR : A. A l l s t r u c t u r e s , l o a d i n g a r e a s , o u t d o o r a c t i v i t y ar e a s , e x c l u s i v e o f p a r k i n g s h a l l b e l o c a t e d a m i n i mum of six hundred feet (600') from any abutting re s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t s . B. F o o d p r o c e s s i n g s h a l l b e l o c a t e d a m i n i m u m o f o n e t h o u s a n d f e e t ( 1 , 0 0 0 ' ) f r o m a n y h o s p i t a l . C. T h e a p p l i c a t i o n m a t e r i a l s s h a l l i n c l u d e w r i t t e n do c u m e n t a t i o n t h a t t h e p r o p o s e d f a c i l i t y m e e t s a n y applicable federal, state, or local standards re g a r d i n g s u c h u s e i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , t ho s e o f t h e U . S . e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o t e c t i o n a g e n c y , t he U.S. department of agriculture, Idaho de p a r t m e n t o f e n v i r o n m e n t a l q u a l i t y ( D E Q ) , I d a h o d e pa r t m e n t o f a g r i c u l t u r e , I d a h o d e p a r t m e n t o f w a t e r resources, and Central district health de p a r t m e n t . 9 11 - 4 - 3 - 2 1 H o m e O c c u p a t i o n M o d i f y t h e s p e c i f i c u s e s ta n d a r d s t o h a v e m o r e e x p r e s s e d st a n d a r d s t o e l i m i n a t e v a g u e r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d m a k e th e st a n d a r d s m o r e e n f o r c e a b l e . R e c e n t l y t h e r e h a v e b e e n u s e s ap p r o v e d a s h o m e o c c u p a t i o n s t h a t h a v e b e e n m o r e c o mm e r c i a l in n a t u r e h o w e v e r ; t h e c u r r e n t s t a n d a r d s a s w r i t t e n m a k e i t di f f i c u l t f o r t h e C i t y t o e n f o r c e . 11 - 4 - 3 - 2 1 : HO M E O C C U P A T I O N A C C E S S O R Y U S E : Th e I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e n o t i c i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s s e t f o r th in subsections 11-2A-2A, the following st a n d a r d s a p p l y t o a l l h o m e o c c u p a t i o n ac c e s s o r y us e s wi t h t h e e x c e p t i o n t h a t s t r i c t a d h e r e n c e t o t h e s t a ndards contained in subsections B, C, E, F, G an d FH o f t h i s s e c t i o n i n t h e T N - C a n d T N - R d i s t r i c t s i s no t r e q u i r e d : A. T h e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n a c c e s s o r y u s e s h a l l o n l y b e al l o w e d a s a n i n c i d e n t a l , s e c o n d a r y u s e t o a n a l l o w ed residential use. The operator of the home oc c u p a t i o n a c c e s s o r y u s e s h a l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r o bt a i n i n g a n a c c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t , a s w e l l a s a n y a n d all other applicable licenses, permits, or in s p e c t i o n s , p r i o r t o o p e r a t i n g t h e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n a c c e s s o r y u s e . W h e r e a h o m e o c c u p a t i o n a c c e s s o r y use includes the provision of lessons or in s t r u c t i o n t o a g r o u p o f s e v e n ( 7 ) o r m o r e s t u d e n t s a t o n e t i m e , p r i o r t o s u b m i t t a l o f a n a p p l i c a t i o n for an accessory use permit, the applicant shall ho l d a n e i g h b o r h o o d m e e t i n g i n a c c o r d w i t h s u b s e c t i on 1 1 - 5 A - 4 B o f t h i s t i t l e . B. A l l o w e d h o m e o c c u p a t i o n a c c e s s o r y u s e s i n c l u d e , bu t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o : 1. P e r s o n a l a n d p r o f e s s i o n a l s e r v i c e s . 2. D i r e c t s a l e s . 3. A r t i s a n c r a f t p r o d u c t i o n o r i n s t r u c t i o n . 4. A r t , d a n c e , m u s i c , o r o t h e r l e s s o n s / i n s t r u c t i o n . 5. A n y o t h e r s i m i l a r u s e , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e D i r e ct o r . C. P r o h i b i t e d h o m e o c c u p a t i o n a c c e s s o r y u s e s i n c l u d e, b u t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o : 1. V e h i c l e r e p a i r . 2. V e h i c l e r e n t a l . 3. V e h i c l e w a s h i n g . 4. E q u i p m e n t r e p a i r . 5. E q u i p m e n t r e n t a l . 6. P e t b o a r d i n g . 7. R e t a i l s a l e s , e x c e p t : a. T h e s a l e o f s e r v i c e s o r i t e m s p r o d u c e d o r f a b r i c ated on the premises as a result of the home occupa tion accessory use; b. T h e s a l e o f p r o d u c t s s e c o n d a r i l y r e l a t e d t o t h e personal service aspect of the home occupation acce ssory use; or c. T h e s a l e o f p r o d u c t s s o l d o n l i n e t h a t a r e d e l i v e red to customers by mail. 8. A n y o t h e r u s e p r o h i b i t e d b y t h e U D C o r i n v i o l a t io n o f t h e p u r p o s e s t a t e m e n t o f t h i s c o d e , a s d e t e r mined by the Director. A. D . I n n o w a y s h a l l t h e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n ac c e s s o r y u s e e m i t lighting, signs, or in the emission of noise, fumes, smoke, dust, odors, vibrations, or el e c t r i c a l i n t e r f e r e n c e th a t c a n b e o b s e r v e d o u t s i d e t h e d w e l l i n g . A s i g n may be displayed at the dwelling for advertising th e home occupation ac c e s s o r y u s e i n a c c o r d w i t h t h e s t a n d a r d s s e t f o r t h i n U D C 1 1 - 3 D - 8 B . B. E . Th e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n ac c e s s o r y u s e s h a l l b e c o n d u c t e d e n t i r e l y i n t h e d w e l l i n g , a n d n ot more than ten percent (10%) twenty five percent (25%) of t h e o v e r a l l li v i n g a r e a o f s a i d d w e l l i n g s h a l l b e u s e d f o r a h o m e o c c upation accessory use or for storing goods associated with the home occup ation ac c e s s o r y u s e . A n a t t a c h e d g a r a g e sh a l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e c a l c u l a t i o n o f t h e a r e a o f the dwelling for this purpose. may be used for a home occupation pr o v i d e d i t s h a l l n o t r e d u c e t h e r e q u i r e d o f f s t r e e t p a r k i n g b e l o w t h e s t a n d a r d e s t a b l i s h e d f o r t h a t d istrict and the area being used for the home oc c u p a t i o n i s c a l c u l a t e d t o b e n o g r e a t e r t h a n t w e n ty f i v e p e r c e n t ( 2 5 % ) o f t h e o v e r a l l l i v i n g a r e a o f the dwelling. C. F . No a c t i v i t y c o n n e c t e d t o t h e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n ac c e s s o r y u s e or any storage of goods, materials, or products con nected with a home occupation ac c e s s o r y u s e sh a l l b e a l l o w e d i n a n y d e t a c h e d ga r a g e o r d e t a c h e d accessory structure. D. 10 E. G . Th e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n ac c e s s o r y u s e s h a l l n o t h a v e m o r e t h a n t w o ( 2 ) o u t g o i n g p i c k - u p s per day from a common carrier. F. H . Th e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n ac c e s s o r y u s e sh a l l b e c o n d u c t e d b y t h e i n h a b i t a n t s o f t h e d w e l l i ng, and no more than one nonresident employee shall be pe r m i t t e d at a n y t i m e . G. I . T h e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n ac c e s s o r y u s e sh a l l n o t s e r v e a s a h e a d q u a r t e r s o r m a i n o f f i c e w h ere employees come to the site and are dispatched t o ot h e r l o c a t i o n s . H. N o r e t a i l s a l e s s h a l l b e p e r m i t t e d f r o m t h e d w e l li n g e x c e p t t h e s a l e o f : 1 ) s e r v i c e s o r i t e m s p r o d u ced or fabricated on the p remises as a result of the ho m e o c c u p a t i o n ; o r 2 ) p r o d u c t s s e c o n d a r i l y r e l a t e d t o t h e p e r s o n a l s e r v i c e a s p e c t o f t h e h o m e o c c u p a t ion; or 3) products sold online that are de l i v e r e d t o c u s t o m e r s b y m a i l . I. J . Of f s t r e e t p a r k i n g s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d a s s e t f o r t h i n s e c t i o n 1 1 - 3 C - 6 o f t h i s t i t l e , i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e required off street parking for the dwelling. J. K . Al l v i s i t s b y c l i e n t s , c u s t o m e r s , a n d / o r e m p l o y e e s sh a l l o c c u r b e t w e e n t h e h o u r s o f e i g h t o ' c l o c k ( 8 : 0 0) A.M. and eight o'clock (8:00) P.M. K. T h e h o m e o c c u p a t i o n s h a l l o n l y b e a l l o w e d a s a n ac c e s s o r y u s e t o a n a l l o w e d r e s i d e n t i a l u s e . 11 - 4 - 3 - 4 6 S p e c i f i c u s e s t a n d a r d s f o r fo o d a n d b e v e r a g e pr o d u c t s p r o c e s s i n g ; m i n o r Ne w s p e c i f i c u s e s t a n d a r d s f o r f o o d a n d b e v e r a g e p r od u c t s pr o c e s s i n g ; m i n o r . 11 - 4 - 3 - 4 6 : F O O D A N D B E V E R A G E P R O D U C T S P R O C E S S I N G ; M I N O R : A. T h e b u i l d i n g o r t e n a n t s p a c e s h a l l n o t e x c e e d a gr o s s f l o o r a r e a o f 5 , 0 0 0 s q u a r e f e e t . I n t h e c o m m e rcial, industrial and traditional neighborhood di s t r i c t s a d d i t i o n a l s q u a r e f o o t a g e m a y b e a p p r o v e d w i t h a c o n d i t i o n a l u s e p e r m i t . I n n o c a s e s h a l l t h e maximum square footage in any of these di s t r i c t s e x c e e d 1 0 , 0 0 0 s q u a r e f e e t . B. I n t h e c o m m e r c i a l d i s t r i c t s , a c o n d i t i o n a l u s e p er m i t s h a l l b e r e q u i r e d w h e n t h e u s e i s l o c a t e d w i t hin three hundred feet (300’) of a residential di s t r i c t o r e x i s t i n g r e s i d e n c e . C. I n t h e c o m m e r c i a l a n d t r a d i t i o n a l n e i g h b o r h o o d d is t r i c t s , t h e d i n i n g a r e a , t a s t i n g a r e a , r e t a i l s h o wroom or any combination thereof, shall co m p r i s e a m i n i m u m o f t w e n t y - f i v e p e r c e n t ( 2 5 % ) o f th e b u i l d i n g a n d / o r t e n a n t s p a c e , a s a p p l i c a b l e . D. I n t h e i n d u s t r i a l d i s t r i c t s , t h e d i n i n g a r e a , t a st i n g a r e a a n d t h e r e t a i l s h o w r o o m o r a n y c o m b i n a t i on thereof, shall not exceed more than tw e n t y - f i v e p e r c e n t ( 2 5 % ) o f t h e b u i l d i n g a n d / o r t e na n t s p a c e , a s a p p l i c a b l e . E. S t o r a g e o f m a t e r i a l s u s e d i n t h e p r o d u c t i o n p r o c es s s h a l l o n l y b e p e r m i t t e d w i t h i n a c o m p l e t e l y e n c losed structure. Other outdoor storage areas no t a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e p r o d u c t i o n p r o c e s s s h a l l c o mp l y w i t h s e c t i o n 1 1 - 3 A - 1 4 , " O u t d o o r S t o r a g e A s A n Accessory Use", of this title. Outdoor storage is p r o h i b i t e d i n t h e t r a d i t i o n a l n e i g h b o r h o o d d i s t r ic t s . F. M e c h a n i c a l e q u i p m e n t a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e m a n u f a c tu r i n g o f t h e b e v e r a g e m a y b e r e v i e w e d a n d a p p r o v e d as an integrated architectural element of t h e b u i l d i n g t h r o u g h a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d e s i g n r e v i e w a s a d e s i g n s t a n d a r d s e x c e p t i o n . G. A l c o h o l s e r v i n g s s h a l l b e l i m i t e d t o t h e f o l l o w i ng t i m e p e r i o d s : e l e v e n o ' c l o c k ( 1 1 : 0 0 ) A . M . t o t e n o'clock (10:00) P.M. 11 T a b l e 1 1 - 5 A - 2 De c i s i o n m a k i n g a u t h o r i t y an d p r o c e s s b y a p p l i c a t i o n Cl a r i f y w h i c h a d m i n i s t r a t i v e p r o c e s s t o f o l l o w w h e n a p p l y i n g f o r a n ac c e s s o r y u s e p e r m i t . TABLE 11-5A-2 DE C I S I O N M A K I N G A U T H O R I T Y A N D P R O C E S S B Y A P P L I C A T I O N Ap p l i c a t i o n Recommending Body Decision Making Body Process Ac c e s s o r y u s e f o r d a y c a r e , f a m i l y None D N Ac c e s s o r y u s e , h o m e o c c u p a t i o n wi t h c u s t o m e r s , c l i e n t s , a n d / o r e m p l o y e e s None D N A Ac c e s s o r y u s e , h o m e o c c u p a t i o n wi t h n o c u s t o m e r s o r c l i e n t s i n c l u d i n g p r o v i s i o n o f le s s o n s o r i n s t r u c t i o n t o a g r o u p o f s e v e n ( 7 ) o r m or e s t u d e n t s None D A N CC = Ci t y c o u n c i l A = Administrative D = Di r e c t o r N = Administrative with public notice PZ = Pl a n n i n g a n d z o n i n g c o m m i s s i o n PH = Public hearing P M = Public meeting 12 11 - 5 C - 3 S u r e t y A g r e e m e n t s T h e r e i s n ’ t a n y n e w l a n g u ag e b e i n g p r o p o s e d f o r t h i s s e c t i o n . A l l o f th e p r o p o s e d c h a n g e s a r e r e s t r u c t u r i n g e x i s t i n g l a n gu a g e i n a m o r e ef f i c i e n t c h r o n o l o g i c a l o r d e r t o i m p r o v e t h e a d m i n i st r a t i o n o f t h i s se c t i o n o f t h e c o d e . 11 - 5 C - 3 : PR O C E S S : A. T h e c i t y m a y w i t h h o l d b u i l d i n g , e l e c t r i c a l o r p l um b i n g p e r m i t s , c e r t i f i c a t e s o f z o n i n g c o m p l i a n c e , or certificates of occupancy on the lots or land be i n g d e v e l o p e d o r s u b d i v i d e d , o r t h e s t r u c t u r e s c o ns t r u c t e d t h e r e o n , i f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s r e q u i r e d u n d er this title have not been constructed or in s t a l l e d , o r i f s u c h i m p r o v e m e n t s a r e n o t f u n c t i o n in g p r o p e r l y . B. Al l i m p r o v e m e n t s r e l a t e d t o p u b l i c l i f e , s a f e t y a n d h e a l t h s h a l l b e c o m p l e t e d p r i o r t o o c c u p a n c y o f t h e structures. Where approved by the city en g i n e e r , a n o w n e r m a y p o s t a p e r f o r m a n c e s u r e t y f o r s u c h i m p r o v e m e n t s that are needed to protect the public life, safety and health including, but no t l i m i t e d t o , w a t e r , s e w e r , r e c l a i m e d w a t e r , s t o r mw a t e r f a c i l i t i e s o r i m p r o v e m e n t s , a n d p o w e r f a c i l i ties; parking lot paving and striping; and street pa v i n g ) i n o r d e r t o o b t a i n c i t y e n g i n e e r s i g n a t u r e o n t h e fi n a l p l a t . The amount of the performance surety shall be estab lished by city council re s o l u t i o n . T h e e s t i m a t e d c o s t s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d b y t h e a p p l i c ant and reviewed and approved by the city engineer. In addition to the performance su r e t y , a l l s u c h i m p r o v e m e n t s s h a l l a l s o b e s u b j e c t t o a w a r r a n t y s u r e t y i n t h e a m o u n t o f t w e n t y p e r c e nt (20%) of the cost of improvements for a pe r i o d o f t w o ( 2 ) y e a r s . Th e a m o u n t o f t h e p e r f o r m a n c e s u r e t y s h a l l b e e s t a b lished by city council resolution. C. I n t h e e v e n t t h a t a n a p p l i c a n t a n d / o r o w n e r c a n n ot c o m p l e t e t h e n o n l i f e , n o n s a f e t y a n d n o n h e a l t h i m provements, such as landscaping, pr e s s u r i z e d i r r i g a t i o n , a n d f e n c i n g , p r i o r t o c i t y en g i n e e r s i g n a t u r e o n t h e f i n a l p l a t a n d / o r p r i o r t o occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved in a c c o r d w i t h t h e p r o c e d u r e s s e t f o r t h i n t h i s c h a pt e r . Th e a m o u n t o f s u r e t y c a l l e d f o r s h a l l b e e s t a b l i s h e d by city council resolution. The estimated co s t f o r l a n d s c a p e a n d f e n c i n g s u r e t i e s s h a l l b e p r ov i d e d b y t h e a p p l i c a n t a n d r e v i e w e d a n d a p p r o v e d b y the director. The amount of surety called for sh a l l b e e s t a b l i s h e d b y c i t y c o u n c i l r e s o l u t i o n . D. Wh e r e a s u r e t y i s a c c e p t e d f o r n o n l i f e , n o n s a f e t y a nd n o n h e a l t h i m p r o v e m e n t s b y t h e c i t y a n d d e p o s i t e d as provided by this article, the city may re l e a s e t e m p o r a r y o c c u p a n c y o f a s t r u c t u r e o r s t r u c tu r e s . T h e t e r m o f t h e t e m p o r a r y o c c u p a n c y s h a l l b e determined by the city engineer and/or di r e c t o r . T h e t e r m s h a l l n o t e x c e e d o n e h u n d r e d e i g ht y ( 1 8 0 ) d a y s i n l e n g t h . S u r e t i e s s h a l l b e i n t h e form of a bond, an irrevocable letter of credit or a ca s h d e p o s i t . I n a l l c a s e s t h e s u r e t y s h a l l b e d r a w n s o l e l y i n f a v o r o f , a n d p a y a b l e t o , t h e o r d e r o f the city of Meridian, in accord with the regulation s co n t a i n e d i n t h e s u r e t y a g r e e m e n t b y a n d b e t w e e n t h e g u a r a n t o r a n d t h e c i t y o f M e r i d i a n . E. Su r e t i e s s h a l l b e i n t h e f o r m o f a b o n d , a n i r r e v o c ab l e l e t t e r o f c r e d i t o r a c a s h d e p o s i t . I n a l l c a s es the surety shall be drawn solely in favor of, an d pa y a b l e t o , t h e o r d e r o f t h e c i t y o f M e r i d i a n , i n a cc o r d w i t h t h e r e g u l a t i o n s c o n t a i n e d i n t h e s u r e t y agreement by and between the guarantor and the ci t y o f M e r i d i a n . W h e r e a s u r e t y i s a c c e p t e d f o r n o nl i f e , n o n s a f e t y a n d n o n h e a l t h i m p r o v e m e n t s b y t h e city and deposited as provided by this article, th e c i t y m a y r e l e a s e t e m p o r a r y o c c u p a n c y o f a s t r u c tu r e o r s t r u c t u r e s . T h e t e r m o f t h e t e m p o r a r y o c c u p ancy shall be determine d by the city engineer an d / o r d i r e c t o r . T h e t e r m s h a l l n o t e x c e e d o n e h u n d re d e i g h t y ( 1 8 0 ) d a y s i n l e n g t h . F. W h e r e a s u r e t y i s a c c e p t e d b y t h e c i t y a n d d e p o s it e d a s p r o v i d e d b y t h i s a r t i c l e , t h e s u r e t y s h a l l be released subject to the following regulations: 1. T h e o w n e r s h a l l s u b m i t a w r i t t e n r e q u e s t t o t h e ci t y t o l e a s e t h e s u r e t y . T h e r e q u e s t s h a l l i n c l u d e the following documents: a. A s t a t e m e n t f r o m t h e o w n e r t h a t t h e r e q u i r e d i m p ro v e m e n t s a r e c o m p l e t e . b. T w o ( 2 ) s e t s o f p r i n t s o f t h e a s b u i l t p l a n s a n d s p e c i f i c a t i o n s f o r a l l i m p r o v e m e n t s . 2. T h e c i t y e n g i n e e r a n d / o r d i r e c t o r s h a l l v e r i f y a nd c e r t i f y t h a t t h e r e q u i r e d i m p r o v e m e n t s , a s d e t a i led in the surety agreement, have been installed an d / o r a c c e p t e d b y t h e c i t y a t t h e e n d o f t h e w a r r a nt y p e r i o d . T h e a s b u i l t p l a n s s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d a n d approved by the city engineer or director. 3. U p o n c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f t h e c i t y e n g i n e e r a n d / o r t he d i r e c t o r , t h e c i t y s h a l l r e l e a s e t h e s u r e t i e s h e retofore deposited in the manner and to the extent as p r o v i d e d f o r i n t h e s u r e t y a g r e e m e n t i n a c c o r d w it h t h e r e g u l a t i o n s o f t h i s a r t i c l e . G. A l l i m p r o v e m e n t s r e l a t e d t o p u b l i c l i f e , s a f e t y an d h e a l t h s h a l l b e c o m p l e t e d p r i o r t o o c c u p a n c y o f the structures. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 8 ITEM TITLE: Future Meeting Topics PROJECT NUMBER: MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2017 ITEM TITLE: ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(d): To consider records that are exempt from disclosure as provided in chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION 9 DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS