Alexandria Clarification
Will Berg
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bill Nary [naryb@meridiancity.org]
Thursday, October 21,20044:47 PM
Brad Hawkins-Clark; Bill Nary; Tara Green; bergw@cLmeridian.id.us
RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 C/C Meeting
I believed that the Council intended to remand not deny. I would
suggest an remand order with a memo that indicates the confusion and if
the Council wanted to still have a denial then just advise us. I will
also bring it up to Keith in our morning meeting for clarification.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark [mailto:hawkinsb@meridiancity.org)
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:37 PM
To: Bill Nary; Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
I listened to the meeting tape yesterday and you (Bill) gave a
recommended motion (which Charlie made) to amend the findings for denial
with information reo the C-N acreage going to residential. They can't
remand during a Pre-CC meeting, can they? If I don't have to prepare
findings, I'd obviously prefer to go straight to the Remand Order. But
Charlie's motion was to prepare findings for denial and include the new
reasons discussed at the 10-12 Pre-Ceo meeting. Please advise.
Thanks,
Brad H-C.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Nary [mailto:naryb@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:23 PM
To: Brad Hawkins-Clark; Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Cc: Bill Nary
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/C Meeting
I thought the direction was to remand not denial?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark [mailto:hawkinsb@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:51 PM
To: Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Cc: Bill Nary
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
Tara I Will,
The draft agenda shows Alexandria Sub as findings for denial. CC
discussed this item at their 10-12 Pre-CC meeting and directed staff to
amend the findings to discuss the non-residential on Locust Grove and
design issues, etc. I will not have the amended findings complete by
5:00 today.
Bill, to confirm. . .CC does need to act on findings for denial from the
public hearing before they can remand to P&Z, correct?
Brad H-C
-----Original Message-----
From: Tara Green [mailto:greent@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Anna Canning (E-mail); Barb Shiffer (E-mail); Bill Musser. (E-mail);
Bill Nary (E-mail); Brad Hawkins-Clark (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail);
Bruce Freckleton (E-mail); Craig Hood (E-mail); Diane Stewart (E-mail);
Doug Strong (E-mail); Elroy Huff (E-mail); Jessica Johnson (E-mail);
Karie Glenn (E-mail); Kenny Bowers (E-mail); Kristy Vigil (E-mail); Len
Grady (E-mail); Machel1e Hill (E-mail); Reta Cunningham (E-mail); Rick
Clinton (E-mail); Sonya Allen (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann (E-mail);
Steve Siddoway (E-mail); Wendy Kirkpatrick (E-mail); Will Berg (E-mail)
Subject: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
2
Will Berg
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bill Nary [naryb@meridiancity.org]
Thursday, October 21,2004 4:47 PM
'Brad Hawkin&-Clark'; Bill Nary; Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.u5
RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 C/C Meeting
I believed that the Council intended to remand not deny. I would
suggest an remand order with a memo that indicates the confusion and if
the Council wanted to still have a denial then just advise us. I will
also bring it up to Keith in our morning meeting for clarification.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark [mailto:hawkinsb@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:37 PM
To: Bill Nary; Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
I listened to the meeting tape yesterday and you (Bill) gave a
recommended motion (which Charlie made) to amend the findings for denial
with information reo the C-N acreage going to residential. They can't
remand during a Pre-CC meeting, can they? If I don't have to prepare
findings, I'd obviously prefer to go straight to the Remand Order. But
Charlie's motion was to prepare findings for denial and include the new
reasons discussed at the 10-12 Pre-CC meeting. Please advise.
Thanks,
Brad H-C.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Nary [mailto:naryb@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:23 PM
To: Brad Hawkins-Clark; Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Cc: Bill Nary
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
I thought the direction was to remand not denial?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark [mailto:hawkinsb@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:51 PM
To: Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Cc: Bill Nary
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
Tara I Will,
The draft agenda shows Alexandria Sub as findings for denial. CC
discussed this item at their 10-12 Pre-CC meeting and directed staff to
amend the findings to discuss the non-residential on Locust Grove and
design issues, etc. I will not have the amended findings complete by
5:00 today.
Bill, to confirm. . .CC does need to act on findings for denial from the
public hearing before they can remand to P&Z, correct?
Brad H-C
-----Original Message-----
From: Tara Green [mailto:greent@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Anna Canning (E-mail); Barb Shiffer (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail);
Bill Nary (E-mail); Brad Hawkins-Clark (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail);
Bruce Freckleton (E-mail); Craig Hood (E-mail); Diane Stewart (E-mail);
Doug Strong (E-mail); Elroy Huff (E-mail); Jessica Johnson (E-mail);
Karie Glenn (E-mail); Kenny Bowers (E-mail); Kristy Vigil (E-mail); Len
Grady (E-mail); Machelle Hill (E-mail); Reta Cunningham (E-mail); Rick
Clinton (E-mail); Sonya Allen (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann (E-mail);
Steve Siddoway (E-mail); Wendy Kirkpatrick (E-mail); Will Berg IE-mail}
Subject: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
Will Berg
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Brad Hawkin&-Clark [hawkinsb@meridianclty.org]
Thursday, October 21,2004 4:37 PM
'Bill Nary'; 'Tara Green'; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 C/C Meeting
I listened to the meeting tape yesterday and you (Bill) gave a
recommended motion (which Charlie made) to amend the findings for denial
with information reo the C-N acreage going to residential. They can't
remand during a Pre-CC meeting, can they? If I don't have to prepare
findings, I'd obviously prefer to go straight to the Remand Order. But
Charlie's motion was to prepare findings for denial and include the new
reasons discussed at the 10-12 Pre-CC meeting. Please advise.
Thanks,
Brad H-C.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Nary [mailto:naryb@meridiancity.org)
Sent: Thursday, October 21,2004 4:23 PM
To: Brad Hawkins-Clark; Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Cc: Bill Nary
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
I thought the direction was to remand not denial?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark [mailto:hawkinsb@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:51 PM
To: Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Cc: Bill Nary
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
Tara I Will,
The draft agenda shows Alexandria Sub as findings for denial. CC
discussed this item at their 10-12 Pre-CC meeting and directed staff to
amend the findings to discuss the non-residential on Locust Grove and
design issues, etc. I will not have the amended findings complete by
5:00 today.
Bill, to confirm. . .CC does need to act on findings for denial from the
public hearing before they can remand to P&Z, correct?
Brad H-C
-----Original Message-----
From: Tara Green [mailto:greent@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Anna Canning (E-mail); Barb Shiffer (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail);
Bill Nary (E-mail); Brad Hawkins-Clark (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail);
Bruce Freckleton (E-mail); Craig Hood (E-mail); Diane Stewart (E-mail);
Doug Strong (E-mail); Elroy Huff (E-mail); Jessica Johnson (E-mail);
Karie Glenn (E-mail); Kenny Bowers (E-mail); Kristy Vigil (E-mail); Len
Grady (E-mail); Machelle Hill (E-mail); Reta Cunningham (E-mail); Rick
Clinton (E-mail); Sonya Allen (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann (E-mail);
Steve Siddoway (E-mail); Wendy Kirkpatrick (E-mail); Will Berg (E-mail)
Subject: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 c/c Meeting
2
Page1of1
Will Berg
From: Bill Nary [naryb@meridiancity.org]
Sent; Thursday, October 21,20044:23 PM
To; 'Brad Hawkins-Clark'; Tara Green; bergw@cl.meridlan.id.us
Cc; Bill Nary
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 C/C Meeting
I thought the direction was to remand not denial?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark [mailto:hawklnsb@merldiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:51 PM
To: Tara Green; bergw@cl.meridlan.ld.us
Cc: Bill Nary
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 C/C Meeting
Tara I Will,
The draft agenda shows Alexandria Sub as findings for denial. CC discussed this item at their 10-12 Pre-CC
meeting and directed staff to amend the findings to discuss the non-residential on Locust Grove and design
issues, etc. I will not have the amended findings complete by 5:00 today.
Bill, to confirm. . .CC does need to act on findings for denial from the public hearing before they can remand to
P&Z, correct?
Brad H-C
-----Origlnal Message-----
From: Tara Green [mallto:greent@merldlancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Anna Canning (E-mail); Barb Shiffer (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail); Bill Nary (E-mail); Brad Hawkins-
Clark (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail); Bruce Freckleton (E-mail); Craig Hood (E-mail); Diane Stewart (E-
mall); Doug Strong (E-maIl); Elroy Huff (E-mail); Jessica Johnson (E-mail); Karle Glenn (E-mail); Kenny
Bowers (E-mail); Kristy Vigil (E-mail); Len Grady (E-mail); Machelle Hill (E-mail); Rete Cunningham (E-
mail); Rick Clinton (E-mail); Sonya Allen (E-mail); Stacy Kllchenmann (E-mail); Steve Siddoway (E-mail);
Wendy KIrkpatrick (E-mail); Will Berg (E-mail)
Subject: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 C/C MeetIng
10/21/2004
Will Berg
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Bill Nary [naryb@meridiancity.org]
Thursday, October 21,20044:23 PM
Brad Hawkins-Ciark; Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Bill Nary
RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 CIC Meeting
I thought the direction was to remand not denial?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark [mailto:hawkinsb@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 1:51 PM
To: Tara Green; bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Cc: Bill Nary
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 clc Meeting
Tara I Will,
The draft agenda shows Alexandria Sub as findings for denial. CC
discussed this item at their 10-12 Pre-CC meeting and directed staff to
amend the findings to discuss the non-residential on Locust Grove and
design issues, etc. I will not have the amended findings complete by
5:00 today.
Bill, to confirm. . .CC does need to act on findings for denial from the
public hearing before they can remand to P&Z, correct?
Brad H-C
-----Original Message-----
From: Tara Green [mailto:greent@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Anna Canning (E-mail); Barb Shiffer (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail);
Bill Nary (E-mail); Brad Hawkins-Clark (E-mail); Brad Watson (E-mail);
Bruce Freckleton (E-mail); Craig Hood (E-mail); Diane Stewart (E-mail);
Doug Strong (E-mail); Elroy Huff (E-mail); Jessica Johnson (E-mail);
Karie Glenn (E-mail); Kenny Bowers (E-mail); Kristy Vigil (E-mail); Len
Grady (E-mail); Machelle Hill (E-mail); Reta Cunningham (E-mail); Rick
Clinton (E-mail); Sonya Allen (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann (E-mail);
Steve Siddoway (E-mail); Wendy Kirkpatrick (E-mail); Will Berg (E-mail)
Subject: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 clc Meeting
Pagelofl
Will Berg
From: Brad Hawkins-Clark [hawkinsb@meridlanclty.org]
Sent: Thursday, Octobar 21, 2004 1 :51 PM
To: 'Tara Green'; bergw@ci.meridlan.id.us
Cc: 'Bill Nary'
Subject: RE: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 CIC Meeting
Tara/Will,
The draft agenda shows Alexandria Sub as findings for denial. CC discussed this item at their 10-12 Pre-CC meeting and
directed stalflD amend the findings to discuss the non-residential on Locust Grove and design issues, etc. I will not have
the amended findings complete by 5:00 today.
Bill, to confirm. . .CC does need to act on findings for denial from the public hearing before they can remand to P&Z,
correct?
Brad H-C
-----Original Message-----
From: Tara Green [mallto:greent@merldlancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Anna Canning (E-mail); Barb Shiffer (E-mail); Bill Musser (E-mail); Bill Nary (E-mail); Brad Hawkins-Clark (E-
mall); Brad Watson (E-mail); Bruce Freckleton (E-mail); Craig Hood (E-mail); Diane Stewart (E-mail); Doug
Strong (E-mail); Elroy Huff (E-mail); Jessica Johnson (E-mail); Karle Glenn (E-mail); Kenny Bowers (E-mail);
Kristy Vigil (E-mail); Len Grady (E-mail); Machelle Hili (E-mail); Rete Cunningham (E-mail); Rick Clinton (E-mail);
Sonya Allen (E-mail); Stacy Kilchenmann (E-mail); Steve Siddoway (E-mail); Wendy Kirkpatrick (E-mail); Will Berg
(E-mail)
Subject: Draft Agenda for October 26, 2004 C/C Meeting
10/21/2004