Loading...
2017-06-20wN DIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR AMENDED MEETING AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 6:00 PM 6:07PM 1. Roll -Call Attendance X Anne Little Roberts X Joe Borton X Ty Palmer X Keith Bird X Genesis Milam _X Luke Cavener X Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Community Invocation by Troy Drake with Calvary Chapel 4. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted as amended 5. Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum) This time is reserved for the public to address their elected officials regarding matters of general interest or concern of public matters and is not specific to an active land use/development application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented under this public comment section, other than the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further assist you in resolving the matter following the meeting. 6. Proclamation for Year of the Lions 7. Consent Agenda Approved A. Approve Minutes of June 6, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting B. Final Plat for Whitebark Subdivision No. 2 (H-2017-0070) by BHH Investments I, LLC Located South Side of E. Amity Road, Midway Between S. Locust Grove Road and S. Eagle Road C. Final Plat for Southern Highlands Subdivision No. 4 (H-2017-0073) by Sky Mesa Development, LLC Located South of E. Amity Road and West of S. Eagle Road Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 20, 2017 — Page 1 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. D. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Caven Ridge Estates (H-2017-0020) by New Cavanaugh, LLC Located South of E. Victory Road and East of S. Meridian Road E. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 (H-2017-0061) by James A. Kissler, LLC Located 1303 S. Silverstone Way F. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 (H-2017-0062) by James A. Kissler, LLC Located East of S. Eagle Road and North of E. Overland Road on East side of Rackham Way, North of the File Mile Creek G. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 (H-2017-0063) by James A. Kissler, LLC Located 1260 S. Eagle Road H. Final Order for Silverwater North (H-2017-0069) by Trilogy Development Located Southwest Corner of E. Victory Road and S. Mesa Way Final Order for Little Creek Subdivision No. 1 (H-2017-0067) by David Alexander Located 1470 N. Locust Grove Road J. Second Addendum to Development Agreement for Una Mas (H-2016-0132) with Una Mas, LLC (owner) and Chad Olson (Developer), located at at the southwest corner of E. Ustick Road and N. Records Avenue, in the northwest'/4 of Section 4, Township 3N., Range 1 E. The specific area of this request is located off the southwest corner of N. Records Avenue and E. Tecate Lane K. Memorandum of Understanding Between City of Meridian And Meridian Downtown Business Association: Art On The Street Event L. Resolution No. 17-2017: A Resolution Accepting the Traffic Box Art Image Repository M. Linder 4-Plex Pedestrian Pathway Easement N. TM Crossing Navigator Sewer and Water Easement O. Professional Services Agreement With Jack H. Schonely for Police Officer Training in an Amount Not to Exceed $4,000 P. Approval of Award of Bid and Agreement to SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION, CO. for the "LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $818,863.24. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 20, 2017 — Page 2 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Q. Approval of Task Order 10044.L to Brown and Caldwell for the "WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION — SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $870,050.00 R. Amendment to January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement Between City of Meridian and West Ada School District for PY2015 Community Development Block Grant Funds Adjusting Grant Allocation Amount from $65,000 to $80,000 for the Meridian Picnic Shelter Project S. Approval for Finance to Pay Vendor Payments of $1,578,788.78 8. Items Moved From the Consent Agenda None 9. Action Items Land Use Public Hearing Process: After the Public Hearing is opened the staff report will be presented by the assigned City planner. Following Staff's report the applicant has up to 15 minutes to present their application. Each member of the public may provide testimony up to 3 minutes or if they are representing a larger group, such as a Homeowners Association, they are allowed 10 minutes. The applicant is then allowed 10 additional minutes to respond to the public's comments. No additional public testimony is taken once the public hearing is closed. The City Council may move to continue the item for additional information or vote to approve or deny the item with or without changes as presented. The Mayor is not a member of the City Council and pursuant to Idaho Code does not vote on public hearing items, unless to break a tie vote. A. Public Hearing Continued from June 6, 2017 for Goddard Creek (H-2017- 0007) by Brian Porter Located 2780 W. McMillan Road Approved with modifications 1. Request: Rezone of 12.38 Acres of Land from R-4 to the R-40 (5 Acres) and the C -C (7.38 Acres) Zoning Districts 2. Request: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to Change the Land Use Designation on 12.38 Acres of Land from Office and High Density Residential to Mixed -Use Community 3. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Self -Storage Facility Consisting of Ten (10) Buildings on Approximately 7.38 Acres of Land in the Proposed C -C Zoning District 4. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Multi -Family Development Consisting of Eighty -Two (82) Dwelling Units in the Proposed R-40 Zoning District on Five (5) Acres of Land Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 20, 2017 — Page 3 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 5. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Twenty -Two (22) Building Lots, and Five (5) Common Lots on 12.38 Acres of Land in the Proposed C -C and R-40 Zoning Districts 6. Request: Amendment to an Existing Development Agreement (Lochsa Falls Inst. #103012598) to Update the Development Plan for this Site from Office to Multi -Family and Self Storage B. Public Hearing for Geddes Subdivision (H-2017-0041) by Schultz Development Located Southeast of the W. Ustick Road and N. Black Cat Road Intersection Approved 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 2.08 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Ten (10) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 2.08 Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning District 10. Department Reports A. Fire Department: Public Education Budget Amendment Not -to -Exceed $13,830 Approved B. Legal: To Consider an Approval Letter Required by the Public Finance Authority of Wisconsin for Taxable Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds for the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine (ICOM) Approved C. Amended onto agenda: Mayor's Office: Acceptance of City Survey Results Accepted 11. Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 17-1734: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(C)(1), SPECIFYING EXCEPTIONS TO GENERAL USE ZONE AMENITIES STANDARDS; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1- 3(D)(3), ALLOWING BARRIERS TO BE AFFIXED TO SIDEWALKS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Approved B. Amended onto agenda: Ordinance No. 17-1732B: AN ORDINANCE (H-2016- 0027 MAVERIK) FOR ANNEXATION FOR PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 20, 2017 — Page 4 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LANDS FROM C-2 TO C -G (GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Approved 12. Future Meeting Topics 13. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(b): To consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against, a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent and 74-206(f): To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. Into Executive Session at 9:11 pm Out of Executive Session at 10:32pm Adjourned at 10:32pm Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 20, 2017 — Page 5 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017. A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:05 p.m., Tuesday, June 20, 2017, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Joe Borton, Genesis Milam, Luke Cavener, Ty Palmer and Anne Little Roberts. Others Present: Bill Nary, C.Jay Coles, Jaycee Holman, Bruce Chatterton, Sonya Allen, Josh Beach, Warren Stewart, Jeff Brown and Joe Bongiorno. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Roll call. X__ Anne Little Roberts X _ _Joe Borton X__ Ty Palmer X__ Keith Bird __X__ Genesis Milam __X__ Lucas Cavener __X Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: I will -- if I could call this meeting to order. Thank you all for your patience. Sorry we are starting a little bit late. We had a 1:30 budget workshop that went a little bit late and so thank you all for joining us and for your patience . For the record it is Tuesday, June 20th. We will start with roll call attendance, Mr. Clerk. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance De Weerd: Item No. 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in the pledge to our flag. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation by Troy Drake with Calvary Chapel De Weerd: Item No. 2 is our -- or 3 is our community invocation and tonight we will be led by Pastor Troy Drake with Cavalry Chapel. If you will all join in the community invocation or take this as an opportunity for a moment of reflection. Thank you for joining us. Drake: Madam Mayor, Council Members, if you will join to pray. Oh, Lord God in Heaven, thank you so much for your grace in this beautiful place that we get to live and how the founders were so wise and inspired to pen the words that we could have life, liberty and pursuit of happiness and so we just thank you, God, for that and you have given us a free place to live and the pursuit of that and so we just thank you. Lord, we just want to Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 2 of 76 acknowledge you, that you are the one who made this great nation and , Lord, just pray that you would protect all the things that go on here in the summer in Meridian. Just thankful for this great city that we have and so we are praying for the Dairy Days Parade and events surrounding it and Fourth of July and -- and all the other things that I saw on the calendar and -- and, Lord, that you would just bless it and that people would be grateful and -- and, Lord, we are also praying for the first responders here this evening, those who are -- our police force and the firefighters and -- and, Lord, that you would protect them as they protect the citizens, Lord, and -- and that we would just be grateful for what we have and -- and, Lord, I just pray for those who have no hope tonight and that they would turn to you as you are the one who gives lif e and hope and -- and so lastly, Lord, and not least, we just want to acknowledge these servants here that we have elected and that you would just give them great wisdom here in small details or big things and that, Lord, we just appreciate them and I pray that somehow they would know that and, Lord, that you would give them lots of grace and wisdom in making decisions here this evening and so we thank you in Jesus' name, amen. Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda De Weerd: Thank you, Pastor Troy. Okay. Item No. 4 is adoption of the agenda. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: On the Consent Agenda, Item 7-L is proposed to be resolution number 17-2017 and we will be adding an ordinance under 11-B that's identified as Ordinance No. 17- 1732B and the proposed ordinance in 11-A is 17-1734. And with those changes I would move that we approve the amended agenda. Bird: Second. De Weerd: Have a motion and a second to amend -- or approve the agenda as amended. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 5: Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum) De Weerd: Mr. Clerk? Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 3 of 76 Coles: Madam Mayor, there were no sign-ups for Item No. 5. Item 6: Proclamation for Year of the Lions De Weerd: Thank you. Item No. 6 is a proclamation. While I move to the -- the front podium, I will say that we are excited to be reading a proclamation regarding the 2017 Year of the Lions. The Lions Club will be celebrating their 100 year anniversary on June 3rd and -- and helped plant ten trees around Meridian to -- to celebrate the centennial. So, maybe you can kick this off with a little bit of information about what you have done. Burks: My name is Dennis Burks. We came here from Mountain Home. We now reside in the greatest city in Idaho right here in Meridian. We started this adventure about eight weeks ago when we wanted to set up Idaho as an example. So, we started traveling Idaho and we received these proclamations. In return what we are going to do is take them back to Chicago next week for 100th celebration as 50,000 Lions from around the world gather and that to celebrate our 100th year. It's an honor and a privilege to sit here and represent the Lions of Idaho and we look forward to carrying on many more projects with you and your staff. De Weerd: Well -- and maybe you can tell us about your big event this weekend. Burks: This weekend and that -- as you can see, there is no Lions here from Meridian, they are at an undisclosed location. They won't even tell me where they are at, because they are preparing for this rodeo this weekend and it's their second rodeo that the PRCA sanctioned. They are extremely excited. They said they have got a great stock coming in, they have got great cowboys coming in and cowgirls and they are very excited to entertain the -- the people of Meridian. De Weerd: And the rodeo happens in the future Borup Park on the corner -- well, kind of near the corner of Cherry Lane and McDermott. Burks: Yes. Yes, ma'am. De Weerd: I had to plug that, so -- I'm going to come and join you. Burks: Thank you. De Weerd: Turn this around so we are facing our citizens. Okay. Whereas the Lions Club International was founded in 1917 and is celebrating their 100th anniversary and is the world's largest service organization with over 1.4 million members in 215 countries Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 4 of 76 and whereas under the motto We Serve, Lions Club empower volunteers to meet humanitarian needs, encourage peace and promote international understanding through participation in club activities in their communities and whereas Lions Clubs in Idaho have provided vision screenings for over 30,000 students and whereas the Meridian Lions Club has -- was chartered on September 20th, 1938, and the Meridian Roaring Lions Club was chartered December 5th, 2016, and whereas the City of Meridian appreciates and supports the service provided by the Lions Club members, especially in our local area as they give up their time, talents, and resources to our community. Therefore, I, Mayor Tammy de Weerd, here do proclaim the year 2017 as the year of the Lions here in the City of Meridian and encourage our citizens to show their appreciation by supporting the Lions Club in their many activities. And I'm honored to give this to Dennis and I will tell you that when I was in Austria I was able to visit the Lions Club there. They were having a Christmas market and they are the same across the world. They are community minded. They love to give back to their communities. They are focused on improving the communities that they serve in and we want to tell you how much we appreciate our Lions Club and for you joining us here today. Burks: Thank you so very much. Item 7: Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of June 6, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting B. Final Plat for Whitebark Subdivision No. 2 (H-2017-0070) by BHH Investments I, LLC Located South Side of E. Amity Road, Midway Between S. Locust Grove Road and S. Eagle Road C. Final Plat for Southern Highlands Subdivision No. 4 (H-2017- 0073) by Sky Mesa Development, LLC Located South of E. Amity Road and West of S. Eagle Road D. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Caven Ridge Estates (H-2017-0020) by New Cavanaugh, LLC Located South of E. Victory Road and East of S. Meridian Road E. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 (H-2017-0061) by James A. Kissler, LLC Located 1303 S. Silverstone Way Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 5 of 76 F. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 (H-2017-0062) by James A. Kissler, LLC Located East of S. Eagle Road and North of E. Overland Road on East side of Rackham Way, North of the File Mile Creek G. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 (H-2017-0063) by James A. Kissler, LLC Located 1260 S. Eagle Road H. Final Order for Silverwater North (H-2017-0069) by Trilogy Development Located Southwest Corner of E. Victory Road and S. Mesa Way I. Final Order for Little Creek Subdivision No. 1 (H-2017-0067) by David Alexander Located 1470 N. Locust Grove Road J. Second Addendum to Development Agreement for Una Mas (H-2016-0132) with Una Mas, LLC (owner) and Chad Olson (Developer), located at at the southwest corner of E. Ustick Road and N. Records Avenue, in the northwest ¼ of Section 4, Township 3N., Range 1E. The specific area of this request is located off the southwest corner of N. Records Avenue and E. Tecate Lane K. Memorandum of Understanding Between City of Meridian And Meridian Downtown Business Association: Art On The Street Event L. Resolution No. 17-2017: A Resolution Accepting the Traffic Box Art Image Repository M. Linder 4-Plex Pedestrian Pathway Easement N. TM Crossing Navigator Sewer and Water Easement O. Professional Services Agreement With Jack H. Schonely for Police Officer Training in an Amount Not to Exceed $4,000 Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 6 of 76 P. Approval of Award of Bid and Agreement to SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION, CO. for the “LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $818,863.24. Q. Approval of Task Order 10044.L to Brown and Caldwell for the “WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION – SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $870,050.00 R. Amendment to January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement Between City of Meridian and West Ada School District for PY2015 Community Development Block Grant Funds Adjusting Grant Allocation Amount from $65,000 to $80,000 for the Meridian Picnic Shelter Project S. Approval for Finance to Pay Vendor Payments of $1,578,788.78 De Weerd: Okay. Item 7 is our Consent Agenda. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Under 7-L the resolution number is 17-2017. With that I move we approve the Consent Agenda. For the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Borton: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? Hearing none, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam; yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 8: Items Moved From the Consent Agenda Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 7 of 76 De Weerd: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. Item 9: Action Items A. Public Hearing Continued from June 6, 2017 for Goddard Creek (H-2017-0007) by Brian Porter Located 2780 W. McMillan Road 1. Request: Rezone of 12.38 Acres of Land from R-4 to the R- 40 (5 Acres) and the C-C (7.38 Acres) Zoning Districts 2. Request: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to Change the Land Use Designation on 12.38 Acres of Land from Office and High Density Residential to Mixed-Use Community 3. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Self -Storage Facility Consisting of Ten (10) Buildings on Approximately 7.38 Acres of Land in the Proposed C-C Zoning District 4. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Multi-Family Development Consisting of Eighty-Two (82) Dwelling Units in the Proposed R-40 Zoning District on Five (5) Acres of Land 5. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Twenty- Two (22) Building Lots, and Five (5) Common Lots on 12.38 Acres of Land in the Proposed C-C and R-40 Zoning Districts 6. Request: Amendment to an Existing Development Agreement (Lochsa Falls Inst. #103012598) to Update the Development Plan for this Site from Office to Multi-Family and Self Storage De Weerd: So, we will move right into our Action Items. Item 9-A is a public hearing continued from June 6th on H-2017-0007. Mr. Chatterton. Chatterton: Madam Mayor, I thought a couple of introductory remarks would be in order for this application. Recently I heard that at least one member of our community felt that Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 8 of 76 planning staff are advocating for the developer or the development on this application and I think from time to time it's really good to review what planning staff -- the role of planning staff, what it is and what it isn't. Our role is never to advocate for proposed development or advocate on behalf of developer. We are not pro-development, we are not anti- development. In fact, I know a lot of local developers who would laugh or cry at the suggestion that we are somehow on their -- on their side. Nevertheless, we are advocates. Were advocates for a timely resolution of each application. Whether the answer is yes or no it's getting to that final answer or if the approval is some sort of modification of the application, which often occurs, too. We are advocates for the Comprehensive Plan as the community's vision. We are advocates for upholding the zoning code. But when we see that the zoning code is not working or it's outdated, we are duty bound and do, in fact, propose changes to it as we do several times a year. Finally, we are advocates for striking the best balance we can between development and the impacts it creates on our community. Sometimes admittedly that's a delicate balance, but the idea is to create the best outcome for our community that we possibly can . That's our role and I just wanted to -- I know you wanted me to clarify that and that's I think the context of this application, as well as others. There are difficult applications. There are far easier ones. And sometimes things, you know, can get complex, but we always try to strike that balance. I will turn it over to Josh. He's so important he actually got a preamble. Beach: All right. So, the application here before you is, again, Goddard Creek. As we have gone through in previous hearings for this specific application, there are several applications tied to this particular project . They are a Comprehensive Plan map amendment. In this case the conditional use permit for the multi-family development has been withdrawn and a conditional use permit for a self -storage facility in a C-C zoning district, a rezone -- to rezone that portion of the property with the storage units to C-C. A preliminary plat and a development agreement modification. So, without going into all of the history we have gone through in several of these applications, I will attempt to go through the memo that I drafted and explain the changes requested by the applicant in regards to what they were previously asking for and , then, contrast that with what they are asking for now. So, the -- since the City Council hearing on the 23rd of this year -- excuse me -- 23rd of May of this year, the applicant has submitted a revised preliminary plat and landscape plan. The changes to the plat and landscape plan are as follows -- so, as I go through my slide here you will see a slide for the Comprehensive Plan map amendment, which is consistent with what they had previously asked for from office and high density to mixed use and this is the proposed preliminary plat. So, previously the plat included 22 building lots and five common lots. This revised plat is for a two lot subdivision on the left-hand side or the west portion would be the area that's zoned C-C, one lot there for the proposed storage units and on the east side of that is currently zoned R-4 and that's proposed to stay that way. As I said previously, they did withdraw the Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 9 of 76 conditional use permit for the multi-family project. The developer opted to not move forward with that and as part of this, as I mentioned, there was a development agreement modification request. The applicant is just requesting to move forward with that, but they would like to have the ability to have the zoning and the land use ability on this property be in line with what's R-4 and I can explain that a little bit further. Currently as part of that Lochsa Falls development this property was zoned R-4, but the uses available to the property were limited to those in the L-O zoning district. The applicant would like the R- 4 uses, which are typically your single family homes, duplexes, things like that, to be allowed there. There was not a current development proposal for that project and so that will be something that this property will have to come back to the city in the future for a subdivision if that is, indeed, what happens on the property. There are certain conditions that need to be modified and we can go through those in your -- in the memo if you would like. The applicant is proposing their landscaping and their landscaping plan does show a sidewalk and landscaping across the frontage of that proposed R-4 parcel that would get us the required landscaping, as well as a sidewalk that would otherwise not be installed at this time. Typically we like to see that happen when there is a gap in the sidewalk like this and the applicant has shown that on their landscape plan. I'm happy to go through some of the conditions that need to be modified if you would like. So, I can actually pull the memo up here if that would be easier . Let me find that. So, as I mentioned, there are certain conditions associated with this that are no longer applicable , because the multi-family portion of the project has been withdrawn. There is actually quite a number that need to be removed as part of the application , but we have noticed that there are a couple of things that we wanted to address that need to be added or otherwise modified as a result of that. So, a couple of things here. Except for construction of the storage facility, no building permits shall be issued on Lot 2, which is the storage unit portion of the project until a subdivision has been approved by the City Council and we wanted to make sure that Lot 2 shall only be developed with those uses allowed in the R-4 zoning district. Lot 2 would be the portion that is the R-4. I apologize. A 25 foot wide landscape buffer and detached sidewalk along the McMillan Road shall be constructed in its entirety with the first phase of development. The intent is to have that constructed when the storage units are constructed and, then, there is a couple conditions to be modified. Modify condition 1.1.1E as follows: The site shall develop with a self- storage facility, strike through the multi-family residential development, because, as I said, that's been withdrawn and shall comply with the specific use standards as set forth in the UDC for self-storage facilities. And, then, third -- the third condition there, modified condition 1.1.1D as follows: Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in the UDC and the City of Meridian architectural standards manual. We wanted to make sure that those specific things for multi-family were also -- were strike through and removed from that condition as well. I'm happy to answer any questions you have on these conditions or on the application itself. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 10 of 76 De Weerd: Council, any questions for staff at this time? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Bill, I got a question for you. The DA has never been modified; right? They are coming through now on a conditional use for this application; right? Nary: Mr. Bird. Yeah. There is -- Mr. Bird, Members of the Council -- Madam Mayor, Council Member Bird, I'm trying to recall -- I don't believe the DA has been modified previously, because the prior construction of the apartment s was part of the original planned unit development that was allowed back then and so this -- this I think is a DA modification is -- is in here to match up the zoning of what they are requesting to fit the storage units. Bird: That's -- that was my -- excuse me, Mayor. That was my question, Bill. I didn't see anywhere an application that we were modifying the DA. Are we doing -- Josh, did I misread it or -- Beach: Councilman Bird, yes, that was always part of the application was a development agreement modification. Bird: Still part of it. Beach: Yes. As Mr. Nary said that it was never in line with -- Bird: Oh, yeah. Beach: -- storage was never unallowed. Bird: I just need to read. I'm sorry. De Weerd: Any other questions from Council? Not at this time. Is the applicant here? If will you, please, state your name and address for the record. Allatorre: Of course. My name is Tim Allatorre. I'm the project architect and my address is 6532 Lone Tree Boulevard, Suite 102, Rockland, California. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 11 of 76 De Weerd: Thanks. Allatorre: And I started this project a year ago and I feel like the last man standing. I'm back here, we have lost everybody else. I just want to echo the comments that were made about the planning staff and just be on record to say that I have worked in many -- well, several states, dozens of cities, and the Meridian planning staff is one of the most professional and objective that I have worked with. We haven't always agreed, but I think that's a good planner who, you know, puts the needs of the community first and so I just want to have that on the record that we are grateful for Josh and Bill and the other city staff. As Josh mentioned -- I don't get a mouse today? I'll just give you the -- Beach: Yeah. I can go ahead and do it for you. Allatorre: I will just point you -- okay. As Josh mentioned, we have eliminated the housing component of it. You can go to the next slide here, Josh. And just to recap, the area we are talking about -- next slide and, Josh, already covered this year. Oh. Yeah. Stay here. So, just one point on our tentative map . Josh had mentioned that -- we are -- oh, thank you. We were seeking to align the allowed uses on that eastern parcel to be consistent with the R-4 zoning. If -- now that is to our benefit. It makes this property more valuable than having the land use consistent with the zoning where right now they are in conflict, which makes development more difficult. But right now we have absolutely no proposed use or projects. There is no buyer. There is nothing in the works for that parcel. So, if that is a point of contention we are fine with just leaving it how it is, just to get something moving on this parcel. But it would be nice if we could have those in line. Thank you for -- just to recap where we are at with the storage, the storage facility project hasn't changed from what you saw last month . We are still -- there is around 150,000 square feet of storage with a 1,300 square foot office and, then, a manager's unit of about 2,000 square feet and we have -- as Josh mentioned, proposing to continue the sidewalk right now on the western border where it opens up to the subdivision, there is a sidewalk that stops and there is a break in that sidewalk up until you get to Goddard Creek. So, we are proposing to connect those sidewalks to continue the pedestrian path from the -- the Selway apartments and the Goddard Creek Subdivision all the way to the west and, then, as is shown here we are proposing also to landscape that whole area. So, the landscaping that's existing on the Goddard Creek Way, western side, that would be continued around the south -- or the north side of McMillan Road and, then, wrap -- wrap the project. And, then, the sidewalk would continue. Focusing on the storage facility, as I mentioned, we are proposing a very rich layered textured landscape around the development, with an emphasis on the McMillan and the Selway apartment elevations, providing screening and setbacks as per city standards and, then, we are proposing to build out the development in two phases. Phase one would be to build all the perimeter Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 12 of 76 buildings and two of the inner buildings. The majority of the architectural features on the perimeter buildings. So, that would encapsulate the site, protect the view corridors, security, et cetera, and, then, hopefully, the market continues to -- to be good and we can build out phase two, which would be for those other two interior buildings. Connectivity. Our primary and, really, the only access point for the public would be in the center of the self-storage site onto McMillan and for emergency access we do have two access points for emergency vehicles and the one on the northwest corner, that would allow to connect to future development that is yet to be planned over there. That was something that city staff asked us to provide. Just a typical storage unit plan. There is nothing very complicated about what we are doing. Then we are going to have downstairs office with display area for selling boxes and packing materials and upstairs we will have a two bedroom manager's unit that will be on site security throughout -- throughout the day. The architecture of the buildings. We have 18 tower elements that are around the perimeter and they are spaced about a hundred, hundred twenty feet on center and, then, those are broken up with some scoring in the exterior façade, as well as some architectural variation in color and some build outs and cornices. So, the whole site -- all sides will have a nice cohesive design. Our tower elements wrap the corners. There is not going to be these kind of western false front facades. Everything will appear solid and -- and thought out. We try to keep everything at a pedestrian scale. We have the wainscot band across the bottom. Windows, columns, arches, everything is down to the pedestrian scale. So, when you're walking down McMillan you have trees on both sides and this nice little building to your right -- and it's not going to feel overbearing or imposing for the pedestrians. Again is -- here is a shot of this. Now, we don't have all the landscape in here, but as my first exhibit we have landscape on both sides of the walkway, a bunch of really nice trees that have been put in there . Our main tower element. And, then, the view looking east on McMillan. And, again, this would be the view as you come from Goddard Creek, that's that southeast corner. So, we have a tower element there and the architecture wraps the corner and, then, there would be landscaping screening that. So, if you have any questions I'm here and as well as John from TO Engineering. He's -- he's our civil engineer and we are happy to answer any questions you may have. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Bird: I have none, Mayor, at this point. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: We had a number of individuals sign up this evening. Diane McClane signed up against. Does not wish to testify. Dorothy Pefferle signed up against. Does not wish to testify. David Blasko signed up against and does not wish to testify. Pam Fiscus signed Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 13 of 76 up against. Does not wish to testify. Carol Young signed up against. Does not wish to testify. John Hopkins signed up against. Does not wish to testify. Cheryl Hopkins signed up against. Does not wish to testify. Linda Ullman signed up against and would like to testify. De Weerd: Good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, kick this off with your name and address. Ullman: I will. My name is Linda Ullman. I live at 2735 West Root Creek Street. De Weerd: Thank you. Ullman: And I wasn't sure -- I didn't know that the three stories were not going in. I just found this out. But the only thing that I would to like to say is I had gone to all the meetings along with a lot of other people when they put in the Selway and we knew that they would be going in, but the one thing that we really wanted is for the -- the gentleman to drive through our community and see how nice our community was and at least keep the colors and the same things to where it all kind of came together and I guess that's kind of what I would like to ask is that they -- it does look like it fits into our community if this passes and if this goes. We do have three within a mile -- three storage units within a mile. I think that's a lot. But, you know, if it's going to happen it's going to happen and I do ask that we do keep it the R-4, which was in the agreement and that something is settled, because we really want the best for our community and we were at the last meeting and we have -- we have only missed one and the applicant was not here the last meeting, so, then, they did this meeting and we -- some of us have postponed our vacations or readjusted our stuff to be here to let you know our concerns about this and , basically, that's kind of all I want to say. I just hope that we settle it tonight and know what's going on and that they do kind of drive around our development and see what a nice community that we have. Bird: Thank you very much. Ullman: Thank you. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Linda, would you mind if I asked you a question? Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 14 of 76 Ullman: Yes. Cavener: I just want to make sure that I heard you correct. Since you have learned that the apartments have went away has your opposition changed? Ullman: Well, no, not exactly. My main thing was having three stories of the apartments -- now, I did not want that. Cavener: Madam Mayor, follow up? Ullman: Am I -- am I misunderstanding? Is that still going on or -- okay. Cavener: Madam Mayor, may I follow up? And so you -- Linda, the request is that the apartment portion be removed. Ullman: Okay. Cavener: And so with that does that change your opposition? Are you still opposed to the project? Do you support it? Are you neutral? Share with me your perspective. Ullman: I feel like some of it's going to happen anyway, just like when we knew Selway would and I just want it to fit into our community. If it is going to happen, if we are going to have the storage, just make them nice looking is what I'm asking. And whatever -- like if this comes up again, okay, if they -- if we -- if you vote on this and you leave it at the R- 4, my question would be to you it will be another meeting before anything is built there. I mean will we know kind -- or just they can build whatever they want, as long as it fits into R-4? De Weerd: Yes. I would -- Mr. Nary, you want to explain that process? Ullman: I'm not sure how that works. Nary: So -- so, the R-4, what they are asking, is simply to leave it at that. So, any future -- whatever they want to do there, they are still going to have to come back to present that to the Mayor and Council for what they would like to do. Right now it's just going to be bare ground -- Ullman: Right. Nary: -- and nothing else. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 15 of 76 Ullman: Okay. That's kind of what I was wondering if they -- they would have to come back and -- De Weerd: They would come back with a preliminary plat. Nary: Yes. De Weerd: Because the only thing for the parcel that they are going to remain in R-4, they would need to plat that and that would be -- that would be a public process. Ullman: Okay. De Weerd: So, you would see how the layout would be, but it would be for R-4. Ullman: But it would be for the R-4. De Weerd: Yes. Ullman: Because I know that's -- that is within the agreement. So, okay, thank you. Cavener: Thank you, Linda. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Jim -- Jim Ullman signed up against and does not wish to testify. Angie Ludlow signed up against and does not wish to testify. Richard Stillwell signed up against and would like to testify. De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Stilwell: Richard Stilwell. 15 -- 5117 North Dove Rich Place. De Weerd: Thank you. Stilwell: In the Kelly Creek Subdivision. I'm more confused than I was before . I have a real problem with the procedure. De Weerd: Can you move that -- Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 16 of 76 Stilwell: I'm sorry. De Weerd: Thank you. Stilwell: With the procedure that has gone on. Is that -- I was at the -- first of all, this started out on December 23rd for the zoning and planning commission, then, there was another meeting in March 23rd I believe and, then, yet another one in April, at which point the zoning and planning commission recommended denial and, then, it came to City Council and that appeared on the 23rd of May, I believe. I may be wrong about these dates. At which time a motion was made to approve the request to change the zoning to allow the apartment complex. Well, that motion was defeated. You know, in everyday parlance, in the King's English, if a motion is defeated you would think that was the denial. But, then, we come to learn that, no, it isn't a denial and so now it appears that we are back to where we started again, which is asking for a motion to amend the zoning -- the R-4 zoning; am I correct about that? Or at least expand the uses of that. Am I correct about that? Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Since it was my motion, maybe I will speak to it. It was before us as it was and so we have to take an action, whether it's an approval and that motion, then, gets approved and, then, the action is taken or if I were to make the motion to deny it and , then, that motion was passed, that would be the action. Where the motion is what failed, the project didn't fail, the motion failed. So, the action is what failed. And, then, that's when it got a little confusing, because the applicant got back up and said, well, maybe we can separate the use, so, then, it seemed like there was -- really the major opposition was to the multi-family, not so much to the storage units. So, we went ahead and pushed it to another meeting to allow the developer time to work with staff to separate the projects , so that we can either hear them separately or they could decide not to do it , which it sounds like they have decided not do the multi-family at all and just stick with the storage, but, yes, still changing the zoning to allow for the storage, as opposed to just whatever it was before. But it was still -- there was no approval or denial that took place. So, then, it took more time than anticipated to fully separate these and have the process go through , so that we could actually make the decision tonight. But in the -- in the decision in the motion that I made to continue it to tonight, we made clear that the decision will be made tonight, that what they bring for us is -- we are either going to approve it or deny it, we are not going to push it to another meeting to decide later. So, it is just the storage and, then, Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 17 of 76 the other side R-4, which like it was pointed out, is usually single family homes or duplexes, but not apartments. Does that help? Stilwell: Well, I understand -- so, we have two issues before us; right? One is the storage unit -- first the storage -- at the end of May the storage unit was going to be moved to the east side and, then, apparently, they were not able to gain -- or I guess egress -- or changes of egress from the county, so now we are back on the west side where it was originally planned to be. Okay? So, that's one issue. And I have no position on that one. My other issue is what about the other five acres? Now, there is something in here about further the applicant is requesting that this property, meaning the five acres, I believe, is no longer be allowed to be developed with office as originally approved under the Lochsa Falls planned unit development. The study proposes that the property be developed with allowed uses listed in the UD -- De Weerd: Sir, can you pull the microphone over. Stilwell: Okay. De Weerd: You can pull it over if -- Stilwell: Okay. Do I need to start again? De Weerd: No. Stilwell: Okay. Fine. De Weerd: I think just -- Stilwell: In other words, he's now proposing that the property be developed in allowed uses with the UDC table. Okay. So, there appears to be a change there as well. The problem with this proposal is that I have no idea what they are going to put in there. Just as a normal human being I would like to see what was going in there before we start making changes and so I -- you know, I opposed this. The last point that I would like to make and, then, I will be quiet, is that through this whole process, starting with the zoning and planning commission, there are notices required, in fact, signs posted where the development is supposed to occur and for so many days and so on and so forth . What we have had here for the last couple of meetings is that things keep changing. I mean the -- the storage unit was going to be on the east side, then, the west side, now it's back on the west side. I'm sorry. And I just found out about this about a day ago, okay, and apparently that wasn't the zoning and planning department's fault, because they just Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 18 of 76 found out about it recently. But if we are going to have citizen participation, they have to be given notice and notice has to be more than 24 or 48 hours, you know, certainly including a weekend. Otherwise, you know, this -- it just doesn't work well, folks. I mean, you know, people have to -- you know, within our HOA we have to consult, does the HOA take a position, does it not take a position? What about the neighbors that are going to be affected. Is that -- we have to be given proper notice and proper notice means at least a week or two weeks, so that we can figure out what's going on. Otherwise, you're going to get a random set of citizens down here who may understand it or like me isn't quite sure what's going on and really can't take a position. I can't tell you that I really oppose the eastern five acres, because I have no idea what's going in there. Okay? So, I would respectfully request that you deny their petition to make any changes on that eastern five acres until they can come back with some kind of an idea of what they are going to put in there. Palmer: Madam Mayor? Stilwell: Thank you. De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Madam Mayor. And, sir, with all due respect, it's because of the notice that was given to the citizens and the citizens came that we had a second and third meeting. Had nobody come to the first one and there was no objection to it, I imagine we probably would have just passed it as it was. But because there was so much objection we took a step back, slowed it down, give the developer a chance to make the neighbors happy by changing the project with what all the concerns were and so that's why we are here today and it sounded like, you know, when the applicant got up that he wasn't completely set on keeping it R-4. He would like to to make it simpler for future development, but if there -- if it sounds like there ends up being a lot of objection to that being R-4, that might be something that we can -- I don't know how that process works, whether that's what's before us, if that's something that we can keep that or if he would have to come back again, but -- I don't know, but it's -- I just wanted to -- Stilwell: Yeah. I know. Palmer: That it's -- it's because -- Stilwell: I do understand that, yeah, as a citizen -- you know, by profession I am an application developer, software engineer. I don't understand all of -- you know, all the jargon in terms of -- Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 19 of 76 De Weerd: Can you pull that -- Stilwell: You know, by profession I am application engineer, Software developer. I don't understand all the jargon and I certainly don't understand all your procedures. I'm not saying that they aren't good procedures, it's just I don't -- you know, we don't understand them and it's not reasonable to expect them to understand all the details. For an example, when a motion to approve is voted down , I think, you know, for the average person they would think, okay, that issue has been solved. Well, you know, we found out, no, that isn't the way it works and so it's just a confusing process and I think if you're sensing some frustration -- which I am a little frustrated -- is that the number of hours that I have spent sitting in these hearings, not only here, but also in terms of the Planning and Zoning Commission -- I must be up about eight, ten hours. Plus the time that I have -- and I -- as you can tell, I haven't really dug into this. I mean if I was going to actually learn this, I would be at this -- I would put in at least 20 to 40 hours on trying to understand what these various designations -- I still have no idea what he's proposing in terms of UDC Table 11- 2A-2, because when I look in there, there is a -- there is a whole list of uses with different codes next to them. So, I have no idea which one applies to the -- to the -- you know, to the subject property here. That's my only point. It -- you know, it -- the procedure needs to be more transparent. That's -- that's all I'm saying. So, I thank you for your time and if I seemed a little frustrated, I hope you can understand. Thank you. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Stilwell, would you stand for a question? Stilwell: Yes. Cavener: I appreciate you being here. I appreciate you being here two weeks ago, the week -- two weeks before that at the Planning and Zoning Commission and appreciate your frustration and I apologize for any issues this has caused, but I'm hoping maybe you could give us just a little bit of insight outside of this application . You strike me as an individual who is educated, articulate, and pragmatic. What are the things that you would like to have seen done differently, so that it was more transparent for you? Stilwell: I think that the -- I think that, first of all, may be a part of the confusion is that it was a complicated petition that was put forward and these things need to be phrased more -- you know, I think more clearly in some respects. That's number one. Number Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 20 of 76 two, I mean with all due respect to the Council, is that, you know, if we aren't going to approve something, then, we should deny it or vice-versa -- or if we are not going to do that and we want to have -- we are denying this particular suggestion or -- or petition for the particular use, but we want to keep this open, because we want to consider other uses -- and that should have been stated. You know, maybe it was and I didn't understand it, but when I walked out I thought, well, that part is over with and -- well, no not really. And I just think it -- it needs to be more clearly stated is all. Okay? And, then, second thing is is that if we are going to allow the petitioner to, basically, amend his petition, okay, then, their needs to be given proper notices. In other words, the petitioner -- and I don't fault the -- the developer here or the architect or the engineering firm, but they need to be able -- they need to understand that if they are going to make changes, then, they need to complete their changes and have -- De Weerd: Sir, if you could speak into the microphone. Stilwell: Okay. They need to complete their changes and have them posted at least on the city website a week or two weeks before the hearing, so that the public has reasonable notice. Cavener: Thank you. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Sorry just to jump in here. So, just to clarify, is I agree with you. I know there are a lot of times that I try to explain things sometimes in a way that people could understand, because before I did this I wouldn't have understood a word they were talking about up here, so I understand where your frustration comes from. What happened a couple of weeks ago is we didn't approve the project, because we asked the developer to go back and remove the apartment buildings and, then, bring it back. So, we did a continuance. So, we said we continue this meeting until the 20th, hoping that -- we tried to let all of you know, then, we are going to be coming back on the 20th for this continuance. We couldn't -- if we denied it he would have had to go through a very lengthy process to start over and that would be unfair to him. So, we gave him an opportunity to fix what we didn't like in the application and come back today. The five acres -- all he's asking for is that he can build houses on it. R-4 is no more than four houses per acre and those lots are probably the -- similar to the ones that you -- the ones that you live in are probably R-4 or R-8. Stilwell: Okay. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 21 of 76 Milam: So, they are the same size or bigger than the rest of the surrounding area. Stilwell: Okay. Milam: If that's helpful. Stilwell: Yes. Milam: Okay. Beach: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Josh. Beach: If I could just to clarify a couple of things that -- I think there has been some confusion -- and I'm trying to pull up the -- a couple of things in our code that I think folks are confused about. One is Table 11-2A-2, which does have quite a long list of potential -- either conditional uses, accessory uses, or permitted uses and if there is a dash on here, it's a use that's not permitted at all. So, yes, there are things besides single family homes, if I scroll through here, that could potentially be approved on that five acre piece. So, I don't want the impression to come across that it's just going to be single family homes. And there may not necessarily be a -- you know, in theory there will be a preliminary plat on that property, but if a single property -- build one home on five acres of property, that's -- that's a scenario in which there could not be another hearing in front of any board or commission or the City Council. I don't see that happening, but just -- just so that's out there. I will also say that Councilman Milam indicated that four homes -- it's actually an 8,000 square foot lot is what's allowed in the R-4. So, you could potentially have more than four on an acre. So, I wanted to make sure that was clear. I apologize for any confusion there was with the memo that I sent out, but I wanted to make sure -- that folks were aware that there is a discrepancy right now with -- the development agreement allows this R-4 parcel as it currently states -- or as it's currently zoned to have uses that are allowed in the L-O zoning district. As a -- as a planner I don't -- I don't like that, because it's -- there is a lot of confusion involved and that may be part of the reason why folks have decided they don't want to develop the piece of property, because the zoning does not match what you can actually do with the property. So, in regards to lining those back up, it made sense and discussions with the applicant is that you can do one of two things I think would make sense. You can ask to rezone that L-O and have that be consistent. You can have it do R-4, so that the zoning and the uses are consistent and that was the -- that was the reasoning why we put that in the memo is 11-2A-2 is a Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 22 of 76 table that allows for those uses in the R-4 zoning district to match what the actual zoning is. So -- and it may have been overkill on explanation, but I wanted to at least explain the reasoning why we went that direction. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: I'm sorry, I think you just made everything more confusing. Also I -- you know, I will tell you that generally this begins with a neighborhood meeting and that neighborhood meeting happens within a 300 foot noticing area. What neighbors see at that time is often nothing similar to what is eventually applied, because we hope that the applicant learns from talking to the neighbors what is palatable and what isn't and so oftentimes they do go back to the drawing board. I don't know about this case, but I do know what we eventually see, because of the public process that is put in place, that it's oftentimes a totally different application than what was originally envisioned and -- and so I understand your confusion. I have stood where you have and probably why I got involved with the city is I wanted to have a better understanding of what all that process was. So, your voice is important and many times it's the citizen voices that do change applications, because the developer wants to see approval. Planning and Zoning Commission is a recommending body. They -- Stilwell: I understand. De Weerd: -- they cannot in this regard make decisions. They make recommendations to the decision making body, which is the City Council, and at the meeting in May when they heard this, they did not like the apartments in the same reason -- well, most of them didn't -- to the same reason the citizens had concerns and so they said -- the first motion was to approve. It failed, but we still needed to take action and the Council at that time was not ready to take action, because of some of the -- the comments they heard and they said, well, why don't we continue this, allow the applicant to look at what they are proposing and consider something that's a modification of what they have applied and that is within in City Council's rights to say we are not going to totally kill this, but we want to give you another opportunity to bring something else back , considering all the testimony that was heard, that we hope -- and I think I even said at the end, I hope you have heard the neighbors and that you will work with them and I think they work ed with the feedback that they heard and that's what you're seeing today. When we continued it, it was on June 6th, I believe, and they continued it because they weren't quite ready to come back with a proposal I think they felt would satisfy what Council's feedback was at that public hearing and to be sensitive to the citizens. So, that's why we are here today is to consider, yes, yet another application or another version of what they can do and with the clarification that staff made, we have planned developments, they were -- they Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 23 of 76 were zoned one thing, even though they were a collective of a number of different land uses, and that's -- if all of you that were part of the Selway apartment concern, that was part of the master plan for Lochsa Falls. However, it was all classified under an R-4. So, this particular development, although it's part of that master plan, it was specifically designated for office. So, staff would like to see a clean-up, so that when someone comes in they will see the uses intended actually reflected in case someone does do their research and say, oh, well, that is office, a conditional use permit is -- is required to consider storage units and this is R-4, which is primarily residential homes. There are other uses allowed, but those are conditional uses that require a more extensive public process. I hope that makes sense to you. Stilwell: It does and I would just like to say that I'm not anti-developer and I'm not anti- development, I'm well aware that that property is going to be developed and I also think it's worthwhile for the homeowners try to work with the developer. They may not get everything they want, but oftentimes half a loaf is better than no loaf at all and so I think, you know, the homeowners and, you know, if need be the homeowner's association should make an effort before we bring -- the matter comes to you guys to make an effort to see if we can compromise or if we can come up with a solution that's going to satisfy everybody. So, in addition to that I'm not anti-development or anything like that, I just get worried when people start saying here, make this change, but we aren't going to tell you what's going in. You know what I mean? That makes me concerned and that was -- was my -- and, then, you know, I went on a camping trip this weekend, when I -- when I Ieft I thought, yeah, this was not going to come up, that this was just putting the storage unit back on the west side of the property and that was it. I come back from this camping trip and, guess what, then I started reading this other language and it's like well, what's up here. What's going on? And I started to review the whole procedure and the process that I -- as some might describe and that's when I started to get frustrated, because I couldn't understand what was going on here really. I really couldn't, in all good faith, take a position saying I oppose this, because I wasn't sure what I was opposing, to be very honest about it. At the same time I couldn't take a position of supporting it, because I had no idea what I was supporting. De Weerd: Well, you know, that's why we show up, too. We want to see that's actually being proposed as well. Stilwell: I'm sure there is other people that would like to get up here and -- De Weerd: Thank you. Stilwell: And thank you very much. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 24 of 76 Palmer: Madam Mayor. If I could ask you one more question. So, knowing that it's on the west side, seeing some renderings and having a basic understanding, not a comprehensive understanding of what R-4 is -- and an R-4 -- also there is projects before us where all the neighbors are begging, please, put R-4 around us instead. This is a side note, but knowing, basically, what R-4 is and what those storage units are intended to look like, how do you feel about the project as you have seen it in the last few minutes? Stilwell: I have seen the project and to be very honest about it, I'm also a member of the HOA board and I -- I think the position of the board at this point in time is that we are not taking a position on the storage unit and the reason I say that is not -- it's not just to give you an ambivalent or equivocal answer, it's because I think there is some homeowners in our development who oppose it and are very opposed to it. There is others -- and you may have just heard from one before in me, that say, well, it's fine and, you know, it isn't immediately up against the Kelly Creek Subdivision, so, you know, as a member of the board we felt that it was inappropriate for us to take a position, come down one side or the other, because in a sense by me saying something, even though I am appearing as an individual and not as the president of the board , still that can get kind of confused. You can understand that, because I see you run into similar circumstances. So, you know, at this point in time we aren't taking a position on this. Thank you. Coles: Jamie Pollmann signed up against and would like to testify. De Weerd: Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Pollmann: Jamie Pollmann. 5030 North Goddard Creek Way. De Weerd: Thank you. Pollmann: Yeah. I -- I think some of the confusion with the unified development -- I even had to write it down -- code was exactly what some of the Council Members were surprised when they heard what staff reported about that . So, my understanding is that the five acres -- I am opposed to the storage unit also. But that the five acres will stay the RD4, which it is. But they want to add on top of that, which is not currently there, this Unified Development Code; is that correct? Which opens it up to more uses. So, they are not rezoning it RD4, they want to add Unified Development Code to open up more uses. Is that correct? De Weerd: No. They would like to clean up what it is allowed and instead of just the office and have the storage units and the five acres designated as R-4. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 25 of 76 Pollmann: Okay. So, somewhere in there it says that they had to add the -- the Unified Development Code and in that code it allows townhomes, two family duplexes, which that's what we have just been fighting against is multiple dwelling homes. But this Unified Development Code is now going to allow it, with a conditional permit. Also I am not sure if this five acres is included in the PUD that Selway was in, but if it is and it says multi- family dwellings may be allowed in R-4 if it's in -- already in a PUD. So, I think it's -- they are trying to come in the back door -- not right now, in the future, to come back before the board -- the Council, excuse me, and try to get multi-family housing in there. I'm hoping that the Council will give the south part of the development the same consideration they gave the north part of the development by not breaking our Lochsa Falls development agreement, leaving it as is is what I'm hoping. I, too, feel like there is way too much confusion, not only with the residents, but possibly with the Council to not fully understand what they are exactly voting on. I could be wrong and I apologize for that. I'm not meaning to be disrespectful, but that's what I feel with some of the questions that -- that's -- and answers we are getting. I do believe -- I just want one more point, please. I do think that the applicant feels like there is not any opposition to the storage unit, because each of us are allowed three minutes to stand up here and talk and so the first thing we did was go to the -- to the multi-family, because that was the most important. But a lot of people are not -- are opposed to the storage unit also. When I was looking at those pictures -- I'm sorry, but it looks like a prison to me. Right in our beautiful development coming into our restaurants and all the shopping -- I'm asking you to, please, disapprove the whole application. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Dan Fisher signed up against and would like to testify. De Weerd: Good evening. Fisher: Good evening. Dan Fisher. 2382 West Apgar Creek Drive. De Weerd: Thank you. Fisher: In the -- the UDC some of the uses with an A, which I assume means approved, within that UDC -- or within that -- am I using the correct lingo? The correct use table? So, in that with an A would be a restaurant, a storage facility -- storage facility self-service, wireless communications and, then, a conditional use permit -- there is all kinds of uses. I think we need to go right back to our development agreement and I think, even more importantly, we need to go right back to the Comprehensive Plan that was developed by Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 26 of 76 the City of Meridian. This is your plan. This is our plan. The plan says light office. There is -- there is plenty of great light office that you see around town and it's beautiful. There is dentist offices, orthodontists, office, CPAs -- it's great. And those are great neighbors. I'm in the commercial real estate and the banking world. I know that light office makes a great neighbor. I also like the look of it. It's a lot more appealing to me than seeing storage units. I agree with Jamie, it looks a lot like a prison and I am very much opposed to the open ended use of the east five acre parcel. So, I think it would be great to just clear up the confusion. I think a lot of the confusion was having two -- two uses, two -- really two applications in one big chunk just kind of thrown at everyone, yourselves included. I think it would be best to just clean the slate and stick with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian and put light office in that property. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Chatterton: Madam Mayor? Maybe I could give just a quick primer on how zoning works in general. Is that all right? De Weerd: Yes. Chatterton: Zoning districts -- just about everywhere. It's not just Meridian. Work pretty much this way. There are a range of uses that are allowed in them. A good part of the City of Meridian is zoned R-4. A good part of that -- I don't have the exact percentage, but quite a bit of that acreage is currently undeveloped. Now, the way zoning districts work is that you have a range of these uses, they either are allowed outright or they are conditional uses or those uses are prohibited. The idea behind the way the zoning district has been designed and -- we try to do this with all of our zoning districts -- is to only allow those uses as permitted uses, which are about the same intensity as the R-4 residential that you would expect to have there, is that lower density residential. Anything that steps up to a little higher intensity would, then, have to be a conditional use and, therefore, we would require an approval process. So, it's really a good -- rather than being perhaps open ended and certainly I can see the arguments about changing a development order -- a development agreement, but a good part of the city is in this same condition as this -- as this eastern piece of property being zoned R-4. So, it's really not that open ended. The idea is to be harmonious with other similar uses. Just thought I would throw out that explanation and, Mayor, I think you're probably going to say that I just confused things more. De Weerd: I didn't have to say it. I didn't have to say it. Palmer: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 27 of 76 De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Where Josh has highlighted this, maybe you could break down for us what permitted accessory or conditional -- maybe that will make it worse. I don't know. Beach: Permitted uses are those, as Bruce mentioned, that you can come in and obtain a permit for and move forward on, without any other hearings involved. An accessory would be something that you could only have and it could only be a small portion of that use. So, for instance, we -- this may be a poor example, because it doesn't apply specifically to this, but in some cases self-storage facilities are considered an accessory use if they are associated with an apartment complex. You can't have them stand alone. Those types of uses would be potentially allowed as part of that development for those tenants only. Additional use as is described -- as Bruce described requires a hearing and that would be certain things as to better rezoning as a conditional uses and those typically go to the Planning and Zoning Commission and, then, those that have a dash as indicated here are those that are not permitted in that zone. So, A does not mean approved. A means it's an accessory to another type of business and it is either approved or is a conditional use conditionally approved. Does that make sense or -- De Weerd: Well -- and the conditional use permits generally are heard at Planning and Zoning, unless they are accompanied by another application. Beach: Correct. And, then, just one more thing. You see Key slash C here. In those cases there are specific use standards that are special requirements we have for those specific types of uses and if they can meet certain standards it's permitted. If they can't it's a conditional use and that just depends on that type of use what those conditions are or special requirements. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Okay. We are going good. Okay. So, Josh, then, maybe if you could scan down -- because so far on -- on what's visible right there, the only two that they could do without needing additional permission would be single family dwelling -- I think is what it said. Yeah. Dwelling single family. A park. Beach: You're correct. There is very limited use in the residential zones and that's by design. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 28 of 76 Palmer: Or public utility. Chatterton: Madam Mayor? If I could also add, we currently have 1,773 acres of R-4 zoned land within the city limits, which is vacant. Undeveloped. So, I don't believe that this is an open ended zoning district at all. And, in fact, it's quite -- compared to many other zoning districts we have in the city it's -- it's quite restricted. But we -- if there is -- is there is concern about the eastern piece being zoned R-4, we need to be -- would need to be concerned similarly about a good chunk of the city. It's a lot of land. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Here is -- here is how -- here is the issue -- and that's not the issue. Regardless of how it's zoned, the issue today before the meeting started is that parcel has L-O uses. You can zone it pink, blue, four, twelve, who cares. It can be used today -- and the prior agreement was light office. Right or wrong. That's the ability -- what can or can't be developed. So, it's -- the request is should that use be changed as part of this to those listed in R-4. De Weerd: Uh-huh. Chatterton: Madam Mayor, Councilman Borton, I agree completely with you on that. I just -- there was a sense that perhaps R-4 was overly permissive in and of itself and that's all I was addressing. Borton: Okay. And, Madam Mayor, what I hear the public -- in what they have said and what they have read is prior agreement, right or wrong. The terms of the deal is that parcel is L-O. What can be done in L-O is what can be done there, don't change that. And if we were to make a change effectively, if that literally rezoning to allow R-4 uses, we would be changing today what can go on that property and that might l imit the public to have a future ability to have input on it. For example, the single family home, which as of right now could never go on that property, absent a rezone to R -4 or that change. So, I think I understand where the public is coming from and regardless of not being rezoned, we want you to maintain that basket of uses that exist within the L -O restriction in the development agreement, which is, unfortunately, inconsistent with its technical zoning, but, nonetheless, that's the restriction that exists on the property. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 29 of 76 Chatterton: And that -- and I agree that the development agreement is the crux of I think the concern -- didn't want anything about R-4, though, in particular, to be -- to be a distraction from that discussion. De Weerd: Josh, could you pull up the UDC and show Council the allowed uses under office. Beach: So, same scenario. The conditional use dash is not permitted. P is permitted. And, then, you see your -- sometimes with A slash C, which is kind of that same thing, it would be allowed as an accessory under certain conditions in a conditional use permit under others. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Borton. Borton: As we do this, I heard the applicant say while it would be preferred to remove that limitation that exists only in the development agre ement and restore it to the use as consistent with its current zoning of R-4, that request does not make or break on this application. And if the development agreement provision that limits the use to L-O uses were to remain, that's acceptable to the applicant and it wouldn't necessarily prevent the storage unit component from proceeding today. That's what I heard the applicant say. So, not to say this is academic, but a little bit it might be. That's not a question. Just a comment. De Weerd: Okay, Mr. Clerk. Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Penny Fisher signed up against with no indication of testimony. De Weerd: Good evening. Fisher: Good evening. For the record, my name is Penny Fisher. I live at 2382 West Apgar Creek Drive. De Weerd: Thank you. Fisher: What I wanted to say, too, was -- I agree with sister -- Mrs. Pollmann and my husband Dan Fisher. Even rezoning it it still goes against the Lochsa Falls agreement. It would be completely gone at this point. I had someone reach to me and asked -- one Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 30 of 76 of the questions they want to know is how can one parcel have two ratings and be rezoned two different ways. I don't know the answer to that and that was something that I had a question for. But they do fill with -- with the C-C and the R-4 Lochsa Falls agreement, again, would be gone. They also feel that we shouldn't be here, because we were told the applicant said we gave our okay after Planning and Zoning opted to deny the whole project. We didn't meet with anyone after the 3:30. So, we never agreed to it. We didn't say one way or the other. Yes, a lot of the opposition was against the multi-dwelling, but I am looking at this, too, what little I do know -- I mean the light office, it does -- it's L-O, but, again, this does say with a conditional permit . It does say single family attached dwellings, single family detached dwelling, townhouse dwelling, family duplex, a mongst other things. So, how -- if it is changed, how is that not guaranteed and why did we go through all this to get it denied, just to have it in the future be able to. Is there something you can do now to guarantee that townhouses -- two family duplexes are not going to be on that property and that's a question that I have for you guys to answer and address today before you make your decision to approve or deny. De Weerd: Thank you. We will answer those as we get towards the end of public testimony. Coles: Brianne Jones sign up against with no indication of testimony. De Weerd: Hello. Jones: Hi. Brianne Jones. 2093 West Apgar Creek Drive in Meridian. De Weerd: Thank you. Jones: I appreciated opening the meeting with reinforcing that the Council is here to advocate for the Comprehensive Plan that is in place and upholding the timeline that was also set for the original plan. I'm referring to the development plan for Lochsa Falls and also that the main goal is to advocate -- or to find the best outcome for the community. We live very close to where the storage units would be and we have been super confused like everybody here. I appreciate you having compassion for the everyday person . Even after explaining it it's still -- with further explanation my waters are getting even more muddy. So, when these things happen I think that we should just go back to the original agreement. That's really the only leg that the residents have to stand on. If you take that away from us and we rezone it, we don't have anything at that point. We are agreeing to -- or you're agreeing to let the conditional things come back potentially, which like the previous lady said, that could be things that we are really fighting against here. So, I do want to go on the record saying that I disapprove -- I want to deny the entire project just Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 31 of 76 because it goes against the original agreement that was put into place and I hope that we can trust our Council also because there are still some members on the Council that made that original plan that we can rely on on the trust to keep that in place. Thanks. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Jonathan Forsyth signed up against and does not wish to testify. Will Davis signed up against with no indication of testimony. Davis: Hi. My name is Will Davis. I reside at 2371 West Apgar Creek Drive. De Weerd: Thank you, Will. Davis: Appreciate the chance to be here. This has been a grand philosophical discussion about the office, residential, et cetera, et cetera. Unfortunately, that's not the time to make that philosophical discussion if you're going to make a decision this evening, because you can have a great philosophical discussion about it, which should take place between the Mayor and the Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission and members of the community, but the action tonight could affect the lives of those people that live in this area for a long time and that's not probably the most appropriate place to have that happen. If we want to have a philosophical discussion about office and storage units and townhomes, et cetera, et cetera, then, the only choice is to deny this tonight and have that discussion and, then, say this is what we came up with. There was a lot of discussion on the 23rd meeting about the Lochsa Falls agreement and, then, it came up that that was 15 years ago, but this Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in October of 2016. It's not like this land has sat vacant for years and years and years waiting for a Council to make a decision and say this is what's going to be here . That was done in 2016. Your first proposal comes as against that and we are saying, oh, this is a great thing, we are going to take some vacant land out of the community and we are going to use it for something. That's the philosophical discussion. What's the best use for this land? But it's not apparently -- it's not something that needs to be made tonight, if we are talking a long term use. I sent an e-mail to the Council prior to the other meeting and I will just close with -- with what I closed with that in. And I base that -- for eight years I sat in the council member seat, for 12 years I sat in the Mayor's seat in a community in another state, another time period as such, but I quoted what was attributed to Dwight Eisenhower when he was president, the important things are seldom urgent, urgent things are seldom important. If we need to take time, we need to take time. I understand your concern when you made the motion before or the conversation about the money and time and effort that the developer has in these things . That's their cost of doing business. They have to factor that stuff in. But what you're doing now could affect the lives of the Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 32 of 76 people that live here for the next ten, fifteen, twenty years and I hope you will take that into consideration as you make a decision on that. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Michael -- and I apologize, Michael, I'm not sure how to pronounce your last name. Katriondo? Cassienda? Caliendo: California. Coles: Pretty close. Signed up against and would like to testify. Caliendo: I'm Michael Caliendo and I live at 2582 West Divide Creek Street in Meridian. De Weerd: Thank you. Caliendo: Thank you. Thank you, Madam Mayor and City Council Members, for letting me speak. I found it very ironic that I ran away from Rockland and Roseville, California, because of the massive expansion and growth that ran you out of there. We grew up as kids on bike trails and ponds and oak trees and I watched within 15 to 20 years an entire community disappear that was a rural community into one big suburbia of tilt ups, strip malls, malls, storage facilities, warehouses and industrial facilities that kind of all hodge- podged into this one big mix that turned everything into a standstill from stop light to stop light and everything was out of control and when I got a job o ffer here in Idaho I thought this was a new opportunity. I moved in the middle of a potato fields, corn -- feed corn and onion fields to get away from what I had experienced in California and I moved here and made my investment in my future in my home. Based on an agreement -- and that's just it. It's an agreement. An agreement is a contract and a contract shouldn't be broken unless there is just compensation to those that are potentially going to suffer irreparable harm, which I think this is putting a big prison facility looking -- prison facility, which we already have three within a mile right in our backyards. It's going to decrease the value of our homes and we are not being compensated for that. For that I'm definitely opposed to this facility. I like the idea of R-4 and I love the idea of the office -- light office use, because where do I go for -- when I had my knee replaced for physical therapy? Right there I go to the physical therapy place right across from Walmart, right in my backyard, because I like doing business with neighbors. Light office was great. There will be dentists. There will be CPs. I'm still using my California CPA, because I can't find a decent CPA around here that wants to do business with me. I have only gone to one, so -- we had some differences. But I would like a new CPA. A dentist that's close. A doctor that's close. Light office would be very, very nice to have. We have, what, probably two, Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 33 of 76 three hundred houses within that facility and I understand the gen tleman made this investment 15 years ago, but I made my investment ten years ago and I'm just starting to see some of the dollars come back and I'm about breaking even on my home right now. To start throwing more traffic and more tilt ups and more storage facilities up is not going to increase the value of my home. I want to -- I would love to see that neighborhood stay what it is and that's a family vicinity, light office use, and I appreciate the opportunity to speak. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Tim Allatorre signed up for and would like to testify. John Carpenter signed up for with no indication of testimony. Carpenter: Good evening, everybody. De Weerd: Good evening. Carpenter: John Carpenter. I'm at 332 North Broadmore in Nampa. I'm with TO Engineers. De Weerd: Can you pull that a little closer? Thank you. Carpenter: How is that? De Weerd: That's better. Carpenter: Great. At the last meeting we had a pretty direct answer from Coun cil and the neighbors that we didn't want to have multi -family. I requested that we pull multi- family. That was discussed and that's exactly what we did. So, tonight we are here simply just with storage units. Twelve acres total on the property. Seven acres of storage units. The five acres we tried to decide what to do with that five acres and that's why it 's more time. Went back and forth with staff. Really, there is two options. Do you want to try to go with the light office or you want to go residential. Really, if you look through code there is a lot more options in light office. Residential is pretty cut and dry. So, to me and others it would -- it seemed there would be less opposition with the residential to R-4. If there is a desire by Council and the neighbors to have light office, by all means we will take it. The residential developer that had the nice units is off to another piece of property in Meridian. I'm sure we will see him again. Those are -- those are a very nice product. But he is -- he's not interested in this project anymore. So, there is only Brian Porter sitting back here that's interested in the storage units and that's it. So, the five acres -- there is Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 34 of 76 not a plan for it. The five acres is to be developed in the future. It's at a value that -- it won't come in at one lot. At R-4, even though it is 8,000 square foot per lot, you can never get greater than four units to the acre by the time you take off the roads and everything. So, usually you're three and a half, something like that. So, it's pretty safe. That's the only reason we stuck it on there. We don't have any intentions, other than it's a little less complicated. If the folks want to stay with the PUD that was originally approved, that is fine. The developer for the storage unit is open either way. Just a couple other points. The Comprehensive Plan, as it's shown today actually shows this property is two uses, one is multi-family, if you look at it -- I don't know if you can bring it up, Josh. One of the things that I would ask that we pay attention to in the future is if we have development agreements that have very clear land uses, they should match the Comprehensive Plan. The master plan for Lochsa had light office up on Chinden and light office on McMillan. If you remember it was a developer that did pretty much nothing but residential . My guess is he really didn't know what was -- was going to happen down there. That ground has sat vacant for 15 years. The ground on Chinden has developed -- De Weerd: Josh, you want to blow up the -- Beach: I wasn't a hundred percent sure where we are at, what we are looking for. Carpenter: I'm looking for the Comprehensive Plan. Beach: Okay. Carpenter: Yeah. It was just talked about that we should follow the Comprehensive Plan. I just wanted to point out the fact that there is actually multi-family shown on -- on the City of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan and light office. I will keep talking. So, really, I don't know if I answered it before, but I want it to be clear, we made a decision on R-4 just because we thought it would be easier for the neighbors. If somebody wants light office, that is fine. There is no issue either way between the two of them. Beach: Just a second. Chatterton: Mr. Carpenter, are you asking for the land use plan map or for the Comprehensive Plan text? Carpenter: Comprehensive Plan map. Chatterton: Thank you. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 35 of 76 De Weerd: And when was the map last updated? Chatterton: It's updated -- Madam Mayor, every time we have a change to it. So, I'd have to look back at the previous agenda, but every time the plan is amended . Usually as the result of an annexation. De Weerd: But I mean in terms of holistically. Chatterton: Madam Mayor, it would have been about four years ago. Carpenter: So, Josh has it up on the screen right now and orange is multi-family and you can see that encroaches into that property, probably, I don't know, 25 percent and, then, the purple is light office. So, our Comprehensive Plan that we have for this area has -- has both of those. It's dated March 2017. I don't know if that was actually when it was put in place, but this is subsequent to that development agreement. So, we are here asking for approval on the -- on the storage units with that C-C, with the conditional use permit, and we are asking for either R-4 or light office on the five acres. We are not trying to back door anybody. If there is a sense of that, that is not the case, we do not have a plan for that five acres. I wish we did. But that -- that plan will come later. As the storage units go in and that five acres -- somebody comes with a plan that makes sense for it, a preliminary plat will come before. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Carpenter: Let me make sure I hit all the neighbor's comments. De Weerd: Well, your time is up, so -- Carpenter: All right. I will sit down. Thank you very much. De Weerd: I guess I do have a question. I know some of the concern both during this hearing and at the last one is traffic. I see you're not putting it on Goddard. I'm sure that there is great appreciation to that. You have a secondary entrance or exit into the apartments that eventually could get that way, but it doesn't look all that convenient. What is the difference -- there wasn't a traffic study, but what is the difference between traffic generated with the storage unit versus traffic generated with light office? Carpenter: There actually was a traffic study. De Weerd: Was there? Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 36 of 76 Carpenter: We did go through that exercise. We did it -- we did it after the fact. Storage units -- that's the -- what, trips per day? So, the number on the right is for what we had proposed on five acres. Yeah. So, just to kind of give you a comparison, there -- as we had it before with the apartments, five acres, there was almost 500 trips per day coming out of that 500 -- or, excuse me, the five -- five acres. On the storage side out of the seven acres it was a little over 200. The big difference is the timing for those, Mayor. It's -- they don't -- don't hit the peak. So, when everybody is leaving to go to work in the morning, people aren't going to the storage units, they are coming kind of sporadically through the day. The storage units are actually really -- they are nice to blend in with -- with neighborhoods, because they don't -- they don't clash trafficwise. But we do have a traffic study that was provided -- De Weerd: Yeah. I'm trying to find it. Thank you. I didn't see it in the original, but I will find it. Carpenter: You know what it was, it's confusing. It wasn't a requirement from ACHD, they came out and said we don't need to do one. Because the neighbors had questions and Planning and Zoning did, we hired a traffic engineer and did prepare that study. So, as the neighbors said and you're aware, there has been a lot of meetings. I have been to three neighborhood meetings myself . A lot of back and forth. But the traffic was one of those items. So, hopefully, we have -- we have addressed it. We are taking everything out to McMillan and that's how we had it previously. ACHD doesn't -- doesn't want multiple access points out on McMillan. That's kind of been a problem. There is a little bit of a clash on, you know, what you do with -- with trips, but ACHD -- if there was residential like we had it, there are the ones that wanted us going out to Apgar. De Weerd: Yeah. Thank you. Council, any questions? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: John, we have heard from some of the neighbors tonight and I think the Council has received quite a bit of correspondence of complaint that the developer and the developer's representative has purported that the neighbors are in favor of -- of this project and many of them are here saying they are not . Can you give me a sense on where that's coming from and -- it helps us kind of, you know, dig through the mud on -- on that particular issue where we were told maybe -- where people believed that the -- or Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 37 of 76 that the neighbors are in support, but maybe they are not. I was just hoping you might be able to -- to give me -- shine a little light on that. Carpenter: I will try to shine a little light on it. It's only going to be a little bit. I can't speak for the neighbors. Like I said earlier, I have been to three neighborhood meetings. We have spent time with some of the board members on the HOA trying to negotiate some sort of solution, especially when we had the multi-family. We looked at switching the location, multi-family on the west side and storage units, just trying to deal with that traffic. Always the issue was the multi-family. Never -- never was it a concern before tonight with -- with the storage units. So, that -- it just hasn't come up before. Cavener: Thank you. De Weerd: Any other questions? Okay. Thank you. Coles: Cheryl Mariann signed up against. Does not wish to testify. And that, Madam Mayor, concludes all the signups. De Weerd: This is a public hearing. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony that hasn't? Pollmann: Jamie Pollmann. 5030 North Goddard Creek Way. I don't even know if this will answer your question, but on May 23rd I brought a form of a traffic study that Ada county had just done -- De Weerd: I found it. Yes. Pollmann: -- subsequent to -- De Weerd: Yes. Pollmann: Anyway, it's 3,300 trips per average day through the intersection of Goddard Creek Way and McMillan, if that was what you were asking. De Weerd: Thank you. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 38 of 76 Borton: To that point and if the applicant is coming next he can correct me, but on the traffic count there was -- we talked about the distinction between light office and residential and storage units and the notes from -- it's a May 19th traffic study you guys did that had the light office trips on full build out of 1,340 daily trips. The ACHD report -- or ACHD report had 365 trips for the storage units and the residential component was less than the 1,340, but the ACHD were much -- much lower than the existing light office use. So, it's -- looking at traffic by itself, the storage units generate far less traffic th an a light office use. At least that's how I read the traffic study and the ACHD report, but when you came back up you reminded me also that you sent, ma'am, an e-mail and -- on early June asking about the continuation and I think other developers -- or other citizens did as well, asking at the very least if there was a continuation from the June 6th meeting to today, to at least address the applicant has an opportunity to speak at the end to at least provide the public some context as to what happened from May 23rd to June 6th that necessitated not being ready or whatever took place to , then, continue it to today, because we had a lot of members of the public and -- and some were upset, some were concerned and I think they were all at the very least entitled to an explanation as to what was going on behind the scenes to warrant that continuance to today. So, I'm glad you came back up, because I remember that. De Weerd: Okay. If there is no further testimony I will ask the applicant to come -- there were a couple of questions that were also asked and, Mr. Nary, do you want to address those? Nary: There were three that I took notes of. One was how can they split this into two zones and the subdivision process in the code allows that, for one parcel to be split into multiple parcels that could have different zones of them . Planning has to concur that it meets the Comprehensive Plan and the future land use map and the designations that the city has wanted and is consistent with that and as Bruce said about zoning, again, you're looking at uses and whether conditional or permitted uses are allowed. So, that's a perfectly legal process of subdividing property to create different zones. One was a question of could the Council do anything to guarantee that the future use of that property wouldn't be something that people don't want today and the answer to that is no. This Council can -- can do whatever it likes to do to restrict this property through the legal process and like the development agreement you can limit what they can do, but the law allows them always to ask a future Council, which is why we are here. The previous Council under a different ordinance that doesn't exist anymore, created this development agreement and put some restriction of uses, but there is no way in the law that they can make it preventable from anybody for asking to change it. So, the ability to have a hearing and have the public participate and have that discussion is always going to exist , unless the city were to purchase the property. The last one was there was a question about Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 39 of 76 compensation in relation to other properties. So, in the law in Idaho development agreements are agreements and contracts between the city and the property owner of that property. It is not an agreement of -- of a contract with anybody else. Yes, it's something that the public can read and rely upon, but with the understanding that it can be changed and legally that's allowed to be done and there is no compensation in Idaho or any other state that I am aware of that changing those agreements requires compensation. So, those three things were the questions I thought were more legal oriented that I could answer and if there is something else I missed, certainly, please, tell me. But those are the three that I took notes on. De Weerd: Thank you. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I had a fourth that was tied to it and it was -- the question was asked as to how we can do that and I -- I heard it to also ask why. The how -- there is a boring, legal, technical answer that makes it permissible, but the why -- you know, why would we allow a property to be zoned X, but the uses of why -- it's confusing to the public and everyone else. It's not a question that may be answered today. It's a great question. I don't recall the last time I have ever seen that happen and so the how makes sense, but the why would we allow that in light of the confusion it can cause is something I guess we can visit and try to avoid in the future. It's confusing at best. Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Borton, I think the answer is as elected officials you always have control of the why. The why is a discretion that this Council has in regards to how land develops in the city and what makes sense. I think Councilman Palmer brought up at the original one if land sits vacant for a long time can the Council consider in their discretion to allow that change? Yes, that is totally within your discretion to do. So, yeah, I usually have to answer the why -- or the how and you guys answer the why. Borton: Okay. Fair enough. Thank you. Allatorre: Madam Mayor, Council Members, thank you very much for your time again this evening. I would just like to tie into the change that we are requesting here. As far as the entire parcel, we are really in a difficult spot with this piece of property and it's been something that challenged us since the beginning. Like John brought up, the upper portion of the site has a use for multi-family and, you know, looking at our exhibit here, Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 40 of 76 coming down well past that second building into the site, that's all supposed to be multi- family and I think we understand very clearly that the neighborhood does not want more of that multi-family housing and when we first looked at this project, one of the options we considered was taking that aggregate amount of land for multi-family, sticking it to the east or the west and just reconfiguring those areas. But I don't think that's the right fit based on all the testimony we have heard from the community and so no matter what we do on this property, there has to be some amendment. There has to be some change in order to make use of the land or we condemn it in perpetuity to be vacant and I d on't think that's in the best interest of Meridian either. To address the issue of why we didn't meet two weeks ago, after -- and, actually, I think also, Mr. Cavener, your question about the community -- our very first community meeting, which happened last year -- the fall of last year, I heard very clearly -- at that point we just had the storage facilities, we didn't know what we were going to do with that five acre parcel and several of the neighbors who came out tonight to testify against our storage facility, they were very excited about the prospect of storage going in there. In fact, one of -- one of the very active members of the community, who testified tonight, told me very specifically, storage makes good neighbors and as recently as our last meeting -- or Council meeting, we met with several of the neighbors in the -- the foyer out here, I talked with members of the HOA board, vocal members of the community, and, once again, they reiterated to us that we don't have any issue with the storage, we don't like the housing. And, then, tonight that target has moved and now we are hearing that they don't like the storage either and I'm not sure what changed over the last month, maybe it's the feeling of being jilted from the last Council meeting, I'm not sure, but it does take me by surprise , because the feedback I have received consistently, as the architect for the storage facility, was that they were in favor of it. As to the last Council meeting, we were trying to find a solution that would once and for all put to rest this question of that five acre parcel. We were working with city staff and with ACHD to try to come to a compromise to allow us to lock down that eastern corridor -- the corner and prohibit any future access off of Goddard Creek or Apgar Way and unfortunately -- and as of last -- two weeks ago, there was still a light at the end of the tunnel that we might be able to get that resolved, but we weren't able to do that. ACHD has very clearly stated that they would not support that. And so the only way we can move forward with developing the storage facility at this point would be to put it on the western portion of the parcel and hope at some point something shifts or changes or there is a use that can be found for that five acres on the east. But for right now that's -- we don't -- we don't know how that's going to develop and when we started this whole process we weren't sure what we were going to do with that five acres and we have come full circle a year later back to not knowing what to do with that five acres. I did want to address the architecture as well of the buildings . We have had several community meetings and feedback from staff. Originally our storage facility at our very first community meeting when the neighbors liked the idea of storage, but the feedback we Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 41 of 76 heard was it looked too industrial and our original design was more of a traditional storage facility look and so we -- we listened to the community and we revised our elevations, we added more colors, more texture, more undulation -- you know, ins and outs of the site, changing vertical plains, adding some traditional roof shapes to tie into the rest of the community. So, we have tried to address that. You know, if there is still a sense that we can go further or we need to do something to adjust it or tweak it, you know, hopefully, that maybe as a condition of approval is something we can work with staff to deal with. And, then, the last point I wanted to make had to do with the issue of marketability and why a storage facility. Based on our market research we are not showing three storage facilities within a mile and maybe we are missing something. I know of one that's three miles away, which I believe is Citadel. There is another one existing of two miles away and there is one currently under construction that's a mile from our project site. But even with that, by California standards that's very dense for storage, but for Idaho there is definitely a market need and we wouldn't be working on this for a year to try to get this through if there wasn't a need and we see the need in the community and we are trying to fill it. You know, if it's not us putting in a storage facility here, you're going to have an application very soon with another developer seeking to put a storage facility in this region. It -- there is a need. The two storage facilities that are existing within the three mile radius are full to capacity. The one that's under construction is already selling -- preselling and we anticipate an equal demand -- or hoping for an equal demand on our project. Oh. And then -- and, then, along those lines, one other thing that we actually have heard through this entire process and every other place we do storage facilities is there is this misconception that storage facilities bring down property values . Our team has been doing storage facilities for a long time and we haven't seen evidence of that. If there is evidence that storage facilities are bringing down property values, that's something we definitely would want to know about , so we can address those issues and make our facilities better. That’s not -- you know, we are not trying to bring down this neighborhood with our project. I believe I addressed everything. If there is any other questions I missed I'm available to answer those. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Bird: I have none, Mayor. De Weerd: No? No questions. Allatorre: Thank you, Mayor. De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Council, it's in your hands now for discussion. If you want to discuss before you close the public hearing or close the public hearing? Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 42 of 76 Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I will throw out comments onto one of the issues and it goes to what I mentioned earlier and the development agreement provision that limits the use of the -- I guess the eastern parcel, parcel two, to L-O uses in the R-4 zone. In light of everything we have heard and read and seen and the applicant's comments, that would be a change I wouldn't be willing to make at this time. I would leave the agreement as agreed and as existing between the property and surrounding property owners that restrict that use to that parcel to the L-O uses, understanding the applicant bringing -- can bring an independent application at a future time to amend it with a particular plan that shows a particular R-4 use, a future Council can address it, but for now I would leave that provision as is. De Weerd: Okay. I feel like this is a staring contest. Who is going to blink first. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I agree to a degree with Councilman Borton, but I -- I don't see any reason to change it from L-O for the whole 4.5 acres. That's my statement. Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I have been sitting here since 1:00 o'clock. I move that we close the public hearing on H-2017-0007. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Okay. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Bird: I will make a motion, but -- I move that we deny H-2017-0007 and leave it in the existing zoning as is. Milam: Second. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 43 of 76 De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to deny the application in front of you. Any discussion? Bird: Call for the question. De Weerd: Mr. Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, nay; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Pa lmer, nay; Little Roberts, nay. De Weerd: Oh. This is awesome. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Well, I guess you still have your vote, so -- De Weerd: I do. Milam: Madam Mayor? You may just want to explain what's going on, in case people are wondering. De Weerd: I think they all know that there is a tie and I am the tie breaker. There is a tie and the Mayor breaks ties. And this would be the first time I have actually exercised that opportunity to break a tie, because usually it's a -- you need to have a majority, because this is something that I think that people have to agree. Pardon? This will not be the time I exercise my right to vote. Bird: So, it -- De Weerd: So, you're at a stalemate. Palmer: So, does that mean it's still before us? Essentially it's a -- Bird: It's a failure. Palmer: Oh. It failed. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 44 of 76 Bird: It didn't pass. Palmer: Okay. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: In light of some of the testimony we have heard tonight about the confusion of the process, would you mind sharing with It the audience what just occurred, because I understood what you were saying, but I want to make sure that ever yone here in the audience had the opportunity to understand that as well. De Weerd: I think I -- I did try to explain that I haven't broken a tie because I felt that Council should have a majority one way or the other. I also feel that there wasn't any discussion. So, I don't have any idea why some of you voted yes and some of you voted no and maybe if there were more discussion from the Council that it may not have tied. So, there you have it. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: While there was quite a bit of delay before the close -- before Councilman Bird did go ahead and close the public hearing, there wasn't a long delay before he called for the question. So, if it's done, it's done or if -- could still vote no on the motion, then, could still be an opportunity for discussion with a new motion, but if you're done I guess it's done. Bird: She's not voting. It's back open. Go for it. De Weerd: There is no motion at this point. Nary: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Just maybe for the record's sake and to make it clear, I think what Councilman Palmer is asking -- the Mayor is -- has the ability to break the tie, she's not obligated to do that. The Mayor opted not to do that, therefore, the motion ties and, therefore, fails. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 45 of 76 So, there is no motion before the Council at the moment on whether to approve, deny, or modify or remand or anything. So, by -- by the Mayor declaring not to vote to break that tie, then, the motion does fail. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: And I would imagine that this does surprise you, because I haven't tried breaking a tie, so -- Palmer: Madam Mayor, so, then, just the motion fails. It's as if you had voted no. De Weerd: Right. Palmer: Oh. So, it's still before us, open for discussion. Okay. I was confused. I thought you were saying it was -- Bird: We haven't decided yet. Palmer: -- that killed it without killing it. Cavener: Make a motion. Palmer: Then, in that case, if I may -- and I plan on a little bit of discussion after the motion. I move -- now where am I on my agenda. I move we approve H-2017-0007, with the only exception being that the R-4 stays L-O. If I get a second I -- Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to approve the rezone to allow for the storage unit and to keep the five acres in L-O. Palmer: Right. De Weerd: Is that correct? Nary: Madam Mayor? For the record's sake Madam Mayor, Members -- Council Member Palmer, there is a memo that's attached from planning that has provisions that I think the only provision -- and Josh can correct me -- is there is one that says to be added -- Lot 2 shall only develop with those uses allowed in the R -4 zoning district. By your motion you're saying in the L-O zoning district should be inserted and I think everything else is Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 46 of 76 related to the storage units. Did I miss that, Josh? All the other changes to the development agreement are -- Beach: Yeah. All those other conditions are relevant to the multi-family portion. So, those are the ones that need to be -- yeah. Removed. Correct. Nary: Okay. So, if that was your intent, then, that was the only suggestion I would add that this memo -- pursuant to this memo -- and I'm changing that one sentence in number one. Palmer: Exactly that. If Council Member Little Roberts agrees to -- then for discussion, Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Madam Mayor and Council, I wish that this rendering that we are looking at right now had more than just the outlines of the tree. There was some of the comments made that it looks like a prison and I can picture that with invisible trees . I feel like their -- their landscaping plan -- because we look at a lot of overhead, 2D landscaping plans and, then, we see them in reality and so I'm able to picture what the -- the end result will be and I can imagine just looking at this you go, yeah, the thing does look like a prison and so I -- while I understand that, I feel like that's not how it's going to end up feeling, that we -- we see a lot of storage units, some that were built decades ago that look incredibly far different than ones that have been built in the last five or six years. They are, obviously, storage units, but they don't look anything like they used to. They are much more fitting with the environments around them due to all the landscaping and the undulations I think was the word that was used before and differences in the architecture a lot of times that we are requiring in residential homes that back up to arterial roads. I feel like with all of the meetings that we have gone through to get to this point, the changes that have been made have gone a lot in the ways that the residents have requested. One of them did mention that they were fine with -- as long as it gets built as it appears, because of the changes that were made, that do fit more with the colors and the styles of the homes. Getting away from the multi-family, understanding the -- the traffic issues, that they are going to be far less than they would be with -- if it was, you know, a bunch of dentist offices and whatnot on this other seven acres. You're still going to have that, quite possibly, on the other five acres, but between the traffic, the -- the architectural setup that they have got, this fits. This makes sense. And they have gone a long ways to fit what many of the neighbors have asked for and so with that a hope for an extra yes vote. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 47 of 76 De Weerd: Ms. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I concur with Councilman Palmer. It seems like with all of this process that we have gone through that this really does address the vast ma jority of the concerns and that the multi-family was really the issue and I think that the developer has gone out of his way to try to take into consideration what the neighbors have wanted and things that we really do have -- have a balance struck here and that's really what we aim for. Both sides of the fence have rights and we have really tried to take that into -- we are trying to take that into consideration. But over the course and re-reading a lot of it today -- this morning before we started meeting at 1:00, trying to re-read the testimonies as we have gone on and the vast majority seemed like the multi-family was definitely the issue and we dealt with that and I think this is a really good compromise. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Since the request is for more conversation, I'm happy to provide some from a different perspective. I agree with Council Member Palmer and Council Woman Roberts that this has been a long process, but I'd share a different perspective, one from that of our citizens and I agree with both of you. I applaud the developer for trying to accommodate, make changes and I applaud our staff and the process works , because it allows the developer the flexibility to accommodate and make changes. That said, at every one of those opportunities there was an ample chance -- or ample opportunity for the homeowners to support this project or a homeowners association even to come and say we support this project and at every turn there has been silence on that end, which, again, leads me to believe that all those residents that are over there are best case neutral with the project and that's where for me it gets to the element of modifying the DA and I - - the applicant spoke about that storage units make the best neighbors. I concur. I think storage -- I would much rather have a storage unit next to me than a retail store or drive - thru or a handful of other -- other places and the reason why we have so many storage units is because we have got neighborhoods where we don't want boats and RVs parked on our streets, we want them put away someplace and we don't necessarily build homes to accommodate that. So, storage units are high in demand. I get that. Great project. But to me we have yet to hear a single voice from our citizens speak out in support of this project. It's hard for me to now be supportive. Recognizing that three weeks ago I was one of the two votes that was in support of passing this application as is, but the testimony that I have heard both in e-mail and in here tonight about that particular element of the DA has resonated with me and I have yet to hear a compelling reason from -- from anyone Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 48 of 76 as to why we need to change that and I have yet to hear any support from this project. So, appreciate the motion, appreciate the second, but I am not in a position where I am prepared this evening to change my vote. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Mr. Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, nay; Borton, aye; Milam, nay; Cavener, nay; Palmer, aye; Little Roberts, aye. De Weerd: Well, it looks like I am going to have to vote and I will vote aye. And I will tell you why is I didn't hear support of it tonight, but I did here support of the st orage unit at our last hearing and this mitigates the concern of traffic, it does not send the traffic through the neighborhood or out onto their entrance, which was the -- the major concern. Puts in sidewalks along the entire length. It -- it's up against multi-family residential, which has a great transition from the single family and I think it maintains the -- the L-O that has been asked to be maintained. So, I think there was a compromise in this application and it does meet the intent of the -- the light office. So, I -- I hope that -- the citizens that came here tonight and that have been coming to our Council meetings and Planning and Zoning see that this is a process and that your voices do change things and I -- I know as I have gone through the process, too, where you kind of hope for what you would like, that sometimes saying we helped mitigate the concerns doesn't quite go far enough, but the process works and I guess I will end it with that. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. THREE NAYS. B. Public Hearing for Geddes Subdivision (H-2017-0041) by Schultz Development Located Southeast of the W. Ustick Road and N. Black Cat Road Intersection 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 2.08 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Ten (10) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 2.08 Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning District De Weerd: Okay. Our next item on the agenda Item 9-B is a public hearing for H-2017- 0041. I will open this with staff comments. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 49 of 76 Allen: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The next application before you is request for annexation and zoning and a preliminary plat. This site consists of 2.08 acres of land. It zoned RUT in Ada county and is located at the southeast corner of North Black Cat and West Ustick Roads. The Comprehensive Plan Future land use map designation is low density residential. The applicant is requesting approval of annexation and zoning of 2.08 acres of land, with an R-8 zoning district. A step up in density is requested from low density residential, which is three or fewer units per acre, to medium density residential, which is three to eight dwelling units per acre, as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan without an amendment to the future land use map. A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of ten single family residential building lots and for common lots on 2.08 acres of land in the proposed R-8 zoning district. The gross density of the proposed development is 4.8 dwelling units per acre, with a net density of 8.9 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the requested step up in density if approved by Council. The minimum property size is 4,034 square feet, with an average lot size of 4,960 square feet. Access is proposed via the extension of a local street, North Geddes Avenue, currently stubbed out the southwest corner of the site. A stub street is proposed to the west for future extension and interconnectivity. Because a roundabout is planned at the Black Cat-Ustick intersection, staff was concerned about how the properties to the north and west could redevelop in the future and requested the applicant a concept plan addressing this, which he did. And just a quick flashback to the overall vicinity map here -- and, then, this is the concept plan that the applicant submitted . This area here at the bottom left -- or, excuse me, right-hand corner is the proposed plat. The rest is the concept plan for the remaining area. The concept plan provides access to these properties and appears to meet UDC standards and fire department requirements. A common driveway is proposed for access to the three homes at the southeast corner of the development. The applicant is proposing .11 of an acre of common area adjacent to the cul-d-sac at the northeast corner of the site along the Eight Mile Lateral, which runs along the east boundary. The UDC does not require qualified open space and site amenities to be provided for -- for developments that are below five acres in size. However, because the applicant is requesting approval of a step up in density staff recommends a qualifying site amenity, such as a picnic area with tables, benches, and a shade structure or other qualified amenity is provided as a provision of the development agreement. The applicant also requests Council approval of a waiver to use to UDC 11- 3A-6 to leave the Eight Mile Lateral open and not pipe it as required by the UDC due to its large capacity. The applicant estimates it would take at least a 48 inch pipe to tile the facility. Conceptual building elevations were submitted as shown for future homes within this development. Building materials consist of horizontal and vertical siding, with stone veneer accents. The Commission did recommend approval of this project. Matt Schultz testified in favor. No one testified in opposition. Mike Sorenson commented on the application and Matt Schultz, the applicant's representatives, submitted written testimony. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 50 of 76 Key issues of discussion at the hearing were Mr. Sorenson would like a stub street provided to his property at the north boundary of the site. Mr. Sorenson's property is -- it's this area right here, if you can see my pointer, which is this area right here. He was also concerned about his irrigation rights being interrupted by the proposed development and he would like a gas line extended to his property. Cavener: Madam Mayor? Sonya, I don't mean to interrupt. I don't know if it's the screen, but I can't -- I couldn't see the area that you were pointing to you. Allen: Mr. Sorenson's property is directly to the north. Can you see my arrow on the aerial? Cavener: Thank you. Allen: Uh-huh. Key issues of discussion by the Commission was the request for a step up in density from low density to medium density residential . They were in favor of the request, based on the proposed site design, and Mr. Sorenson's concerns regarding irrigation delivery, access, and easement for a gas line. They were in favor of the extension of a gas line. And irrigation delivery is -- is covered in our code. They can't interrupt the irrigation rights of adjacent property owners. Commission changes to the staff recommendation. The Commission added a requirement for a gas line to be extended within a public utility easement to the north property boundary for use by the adjacent property owner as requested and the y added a provision to the development agreement that homes within the development are restricted to a single story in height and a minimum of 1,500 square feet as proposed by the applicant during the hearing. There are a couple outstanding issues for the Council. First is the applicant is requesting a step up in density from low density residential to medium density residential, as previously discussed, to accommodate the proposed development. And, secondly, the approval of a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6 to leave the Eight Mile Lateral open and not pipe it as required due to its large capacity. There has been no written testimony submitted since the Commission hearing. Staff will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Bird: Not at this time, Mayor. De Weerd: Okay. Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 51 of 76 Schultz: Good evening, Mayor Tammy. Matt Schultz, 8421 South Ten Mile in Meridian. Here on behalf of Robert Campbell. He's the owner and home builder that would like to do ten homes on this, real similar to a subdivision called Reardon Sub about a mile due south on Cherry Lane, just due south of this. All single story, which makes this thing work. If it wasn't single story limitation I wasn't going to come in here and represent it. I'm like, no, I'm not interested. But with a single story and the 1,500 square foot minimum and the architecture, which he's demonstrated -- I walked his houses inside and out, there is nothing below 250 in this thing. Really nice. The yard maintenance is going to be included. You know, I can represent this and say, yeah, we think it fits and planning commission concurred that they think it fits and, yes, at first blush it didn't fit, you know, if you didn't provide those development agreement items. But with those it's pretty straight forward. We did -- I did meet with the land owner to the north, Mr. Sorenson, on site after the last hearing, looked at the irrigation ditch, not a problem, we are going to pipe a small one that's parallel to the Eight Mile to him. The Eight Mile is huge. Nobody else has piped it, so we are asking for a waiver of that. And there is an existing gas line, actually, right along our west property line that he put in, because he sold this property to Mr. Campbell, so he -- Mr. Sorensen used to own this property and he sold it and there was an existing gas line that we are going to protect. It fits right in the -- right on that property line. So, it's not a problem. So, with those issues, we just think it fits, because it is single story. It's a good addition. It's a good mix for people that are going to want to live in the area and maybe some people that already live in the area that built 15, 20 years ago, that maybe want to go single story, but still be in the neighborhood. So, we think it will go pretty quick. And we think it will be a good little addition. So, with that stand for any questions. Thanks. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Matt, for you or staff. Can you remind me what the fencing is adjacent to the -- that lateral? Schultz: We are going to do wrought iron. Six foot wrought iron. Borton: Okay. Schultz: All on the lateral and vinyl everywhere else. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 52 of 76 Borton: Okay. Schultz: Yeah. No problem. Borton: Thanks. De Weerd: Any other questions? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Not a question, just kind of a comment, Matt, to your -- to yours and I agree that if these were crammed in two stories that would have -- I would probably have a lot of issues with it, but there is a lot of need for single story -- people my age whose kids are kind of going off to college or all complaining about two story houses and ready to move, so -- Schultz: I think it works. Thanks. De Weerd: Thank you. Schultz: Thanks. De Weerd: Mr. Clerk. Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Van Bishop signed up against and would like to provide testimony. De Weerd: Thank you for staying with us. Bishop: Yeah. It's been a while. De Weerd: If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Bishop: Van Bishop. 4630 West Moon Lake Drive. I actually live on the east corner at the Geddes access. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 53 of 76 Bishop: I will admit I was rather ambivalent about this and so that's the reason I did not provide any testimony at the Planning and Zoning, but some things came out at the Planning and Zoning that I am concerned about and I would like to bring to someone's attention to make sure they are considered. The first is that the builder and the developer did have a meeting with the people in the area on the 7th of March. We, of course, were concerned about the traffic that it would bring to the area. They told us at that time it was a 55 plus community and it wasn't until after the Planning and Zoning meeting that I asked him what happened to that and he says we are not going to do that, so that kind of raised a flag to me in dealing with him and what -- what we could expect. The other thing that I am concerned about is that the other five acres that's there, it is going to eventually end in houses and I don't have a problem with houses being there, I appreciate more roof tops to help pay for you guys salary and the things that we enjoy here, but the density is going to be a problem, because if the developers that deal with that have the same ingenuity that Mr. Schultz does that, I see another 25 homes being added to the ten that's there and we will have 35 homes and it came out at that meeting that because of the roundabout all that traffic now is going to have to come out Geddes and since we are not restricting the -- the age on the people there that could be, you know, any number of cars and, of course, living on that corner I don't like that, but a real concern I have is that about two years ago the Ada county put in an on-demand crosswalk for the children coming from Autumn Faire walking to the Ponderosa Elementary School there and so that is kind of the main foot path for them, but now we are going to go stick a street in the middle of it that is going to have a bunch of cats and so I'm real concerned about increasing the density. It's different from what is existing in -- or all around it and I think that's going to create some problems, that -- you know, not just for me living there, but for the youth and those people -- that's just going to increase the risk for them going to school. So, I would ask you to consider that as you consider this application. De Weerd: Thank you. Bishop: Okay. Any questions? De Weerd: Any questions from Council? Bird: I have none. Mayor. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Larry Freeman made no indication on the project, other than not wishing to testify. Marsha Roberts signed up against, not wishing to testify. I apologize, I can't read the first name, but I believe Irwin is the last name. Signed up as neutral. Not wishing to testify. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 54 of 76 Shirley Smith made no indication on the project, other than not wishing to testify . Lynn Montre made no indication on the project, other than not wishing to testify. And Matt Schultz signed up for. And that's all the sign-ups. De Weerd: Thank you. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony on this application? Okay, Matt, do you have final remarks? Schultz: Thank you, Mayor. Matt Schultz again for the record. At the neighborhood meeting the builder did talk about 55 and over. His current one, the Reardon Sub, has 80 percent over 70. We think. But in terms of, you know, mandating it, enforcing the 55 and over for such a small little community -- it doesn't have really any, you know, clubhouse or a -- you know, a bigger 55 an older, it just didn't really make sense to be out there and say, hey, are you -- are you 52, you can't live here. You know what I mean? It just -- it just didn't feel that we needed to go that far. And so we think it will self -regulate to the market, so the majority of them will be north of 55, 65, if that's better. I don't know if it is or not. I don't know if it's a bad thing if there is 30 or 40 year olds in here. But I -- you know, I think it will be fine. And as far as future traffic, it's pretty low density, you know, there are ten here. There might be a maximum of 20 more if we did the same type of development as this, which is the layout that I did, just to show them real quick how it -- you know, we weren't messing up the future development. So, 30 lots on one access, it's really close to Black Cat. It's actually a pretty good spot to have 30 more lots come in and it really just kind of fits. So, not -- not to say that it's not a concern, especially if you have lived there for a lot of years on that corner with a, you know, to be extended in the future stub street that's been there for probably close to 20 years, I understand. There is going to be new traffic. But we think it's relatively low density and it fits and it's where, you know, a road needs to go. So -- so, with that I hope you concur with Planning and Zoning and we did have a good neighborhood meeting and, hopefully, it goes through. Thank you. De Weerd: I do understand that at a neighborhood meeting -- and it's referred to a 55 and older, you -- you would be good with it and you wouldn't follow it, because you would think that that's what it would be. I guess I would have a concern, too, on what is happening to the west of that and why it couldn't come together as an entire package , so you do have some open space in there and you show if it 's not a 55 and older, how you can accommodate any of the families that are there with your open space being allowed to the family. So, I -- I guess one of the things that -- of councils in the past we would like to see a larger picture than one small piece at a time that, then, doesn't trigger the open space and seeing how that connectivity happens . Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 55 of 76 Schultz: I appreciate, Mayor, your comments on that and we have shown overall that could easily have ten percent open space in it, you know, in the future with ours, but this is the parcel we are dealing with. It is to -- like I said, it's going to be marketed as 55 an older or 65 and older or whatever, just because we think that -- that yard maintenance and the one story, single story, that's -- that's who is going to buy in for this price and it is -- hopefully the people that already I live in the area that want to just go to a single story. So -- but as far as -- De Weerd: Do you have an HOA that will do the -- the maintenance? Schultz: That's going to get blended into the HOA dues. The HOA dues will include that. We will set up so the dues will include the yard maintenance on these relatively small yards that will be in here. So, people that move here are not going to want to move here that have a big family and a small yard. I mean there is other choices in the area and this is a choice that's going to be more suited to that 55 and older crowd. But as fa r as regulating it and the 55 and older cop that goes around and regulates that exactly -- we think we will probably have 80 percent 55 and older, maybe 90, may be a hundred, but -- but to enforce it, we just didn't want go that far at this point, unless the Council really, really wants us to and, then, we will, but we would rather not, so -- Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: But my question was going to be almost what you stated -- or your question. So, the other property is the same owner -- five acres? Schultz: There is two owners -- there is two owners. There is -- there is a couple acres just due -- there is three parcels. The two west of us are a guy that we hear will never sell ever. And, then, Mr. Sorenson, who sold this piece, lives on the triangle in the corner. We just put his -- yeah, you can see the three parcels there. So, the two square parcels are owned by the gentleman who will never sell, according to him, and, then, there is a triangle piece Mr. Sorenson has put up for sale with the house on it. They each have houses on them. There is two separate owners there that aren't us. Milam: So, it's not going to be developed by this -- Schultz: We don't have any -- we would love to, we would love to buy it, but it sounds like there is a guy that doesn't want to sell right now. We haven't, you know, went and made the hardcore press on him, but it doesn't sound like he's interested. But we showed a Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 56 of 76 concept of how it could develop for those concern of, you know, limiting access and how they could still get to it and we showed them how -- how you could still get to it if somebody decides to develop it in the future. De Weerd: So, the property owner to the north split it off and now it's going to be another enclave, because he doesn't want to come into the city, but he's selling off a piece that would come into the city. Schultz: I think there is a complicated back story in that he didn't think he could develop this two acre piece, but it was -- it was a legal parcel from the '70s, this two acre piece. He didn't split it off. It's been -- he owned two separate pieces. One of them -- they are both legal parcels and he sold it off and, then, came back and said, well, I want another access so I can develop mine, too, kind of after the fact. Well, we are providing access that works for everybody, but maybe just not you first, but definitely could work in the future, so -- De Weerd: I guess that would be one of my other concerns is an enclave -- extending the access to it, but not having that come in as well. Schultz: Yeah. We don't control that. We would love to, but we don't. And there is already an enclave there per se with three and we are taking one of them out. Yeah. De Weerd: But that owner has a choice, too. Schultz: They do. De Weerd: Matt -- yeah. You can't make the comment from there, but -- sir. Bird: You have to come up. De Weerd: If you can come up here. Just restate your name and -- Bishop: Van Bishop. 4630 West Moon Lake Drive. De Weerd: Thank you. Bishop: The three acre parcel does have a for sale sign on it again now. He's kind of in a predicament, because the design they have has landlocked that. There is no access with that, unless they go through the two acres. So, that guy doesn't want to sell and so I -- I don't know what the resolution is to that, but he's just decided he wants out, because Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 57 of 76 he can't do anything with it and I -- I don't know if the person that moves in there, if they will be grandfather in with access because of the roundabout or if they are going to have to do something and get access to get us to get off of their property once they purchase it, so -- De Weerd: Thank you. Bishop: You bet. Schultz: Mayor, Matt Schultz again for the record. If I can just talk about that. We had this discussion at Planning and Zoning. His access won't get taken away by the roundabout to the house. He has a house and two or three acres for sale right now and if anybody wants to develop it, they are going to have to wait until things kind of go their way, which is how development works. Sometimes you wait for the next guy to do his thing. But as far as taking away their access, he's not in a predicament. The person who buys it's not in a predicament. They have access to their house and if somebody takes away access to the house, they are going to pay for it. You know, ACHD would have to pay for it and they are not going to take away access to a driveway right there. If he wants to redevelop it into -- into ten or 12 lots, then, yeah, his access to -- is going to get taken away. But that will be a condition of development. I'm not taking away his access. I haven't done anything, except for this little two acres here in the corner, so -- De Weerd: Any further questions from Council? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: So, you guys are -- you're trying to buy that -- the other three acres? Or not? Schultz: We just talked about it. It would be nice. You know, that's what we do for a living. But -- but it's not real feasible without the other a couple of parcels right now at this date and that could change. You know, it could change, but right now it doesn't sound like it's feasible, but that could change tomorrow or whenever. You don't know. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 58 of 76 Borton: Matt, one of the challenges is the -- the design and the request for that connectivity to the north, because absent that -- a request to annex and connect to Black Cat is not going to fly. So, it does, in essence -- to develop it further. Not use it as a single family residence. So, talk a little bit about the request to stub to the north and I assume if that was unfeasible why it wasn't designed that way. Schultz: Yeah. Mayor Tammy and Councilman Borton, we could provide a stub street to the north. We could. We talked about it at planning commission with your staff as well. They chimed in to make a real inefficient way to do it, to provide a stub so he could develop first without that guy, if that's your intent. We could do that. If you say we would approve this, but only based on punching that stub street north, then, we would it. I don't think it's a deniable thing to shoot us down for not providing it, but we just felt like for the overall master plan what we did was a good place to put it and staff and P&Z agreed with that. De Weerd: But I guess why wouldn't you do that if you said the guy to the west has said they will never sell, then, you, essentially, do land lock the property to the north. Schultz: People say stuff all the time, Mayor. You never know if he's just blustering until you get in front of him and say here is a check. You just never kno w, you know, what they are going to do. So, that's just in passing he says that. We don't think it's landlocked forever. We just think temporarily he's just maybe jockeying for a lot of money. Who knows. But just the guy showed up at the neighborhood meeting and I guess he lives alone and he just one of those kind of guys that just want to be there and not move anywhere else, you know, for now. And that could change. But we often see these things where not every parcel is developable immediately. You know, there is sometimes steps that need to be made for that -- for any certain parcel to get developed and this is one that's -- that's like that, you know, like you said, hey, we are not going to approve it unless you provide that stub street we would do it. But we are just -- this is what we submitted and we would ask that it goes this way. But we are flexible if need be. De Weerd: Any other questions from Council? Bird: I have none, Mayor. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 59 of 76 Borton: Maybe it's a question for -- for Matt again, Matt, I applaud the efforts to try and develop this -- this little nook of county property, but -- but the lack of access to the north still kind of lingers as a concern and I don't know if perhaps there was a previously designed plat that showed the access and -- or something that showed why it wouldn't work or it's inefficient. You made reference to discussions with planning staff. That might help me understand why it's a bad idea. And I appreciate the fact that you represent and you're willing to modify it to stub it to the north, that in itself is hard to do on the fly. I can visualize what the northern stub does to diminish the development potential of all the parcels. If there was something else drawn out there I would probably want to see it and if there is not I don't want to make a bunch of extra work, but that would help illustrate -- Schultz: Can you flash that back, Sonya, that overall, please. Actually, back to that little layout. This is -- Borton: You have done amazing things with a small parcel -- yeah. Small parcel. Schultz: And Caleb made a comment -- you know, he said, you know, because he can visualize this stuff of how that road going north and being really pinched up against the canal, it just wouldn't -- it just wouldn't flow as good, it wouldn't be something you would choose as a layout for this whole development. If you had to then you would do it. You know, if you absolutely had to you would do it. So, it just doesn't flow as well going up that way. You got some -- where our property line is you have some property -- undevelopable on the other side of it that just wouldn't flow as well as this one does. So, this was the first layout that came to mind of how the remainder property could develop. The remainder being all the remainder property is what our instructions were. So, I didn't do an alternate of if this one doesn't develop, then, this, so -- like I said, we are flexible. If it's a deal breaker we will lose a lot. Can do it. We would prefer not to. So, we would like that to be one of your two motions and hopefully denial is not on the table. But we would prefer to move forward that way, so -- Borton: Okay. Thanks. Madam Mayor, I -- I would invite anyone else -- I may be the only one who at least had some pause with no stub to the north, so -- De Weerd: You're not the only one. If -- if you can include me, so -- it's a conundrum. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 60 of 76 Little Roberts: I agree. I'm struggling with not having any access to the north. De Weerd: Well, Council, if you -- if you want to have a discussion or close the public hearing? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: A question back for the applicant. The -- the removal of a lot, it sounds -- the reference makes it sound easy. I know it's not. Perhaps it's costly, too. But it may be helpful to see an alternate layout that would -- how it would stub to the north and would be incorporated. I think the idea of the project is great. I think the project looks great. Again, I'm supportive of it, but it really would be helpful to see if you stub to the north here is how from my planning experience in working with our staff it could look and -- Schultz: Excuse me, Mayor and Councilman Borton. You mean as it reflects to our layout or to the future layout -- how the future property would lay out with a stub to the north? Borton: Madam Mayor. Probably the -- the future layout of the remaining three parcels. Schultz: Uh-huh. Borton: I appreciate what you did in trying to anticipate how it could efficiently lay out like this, I don't know if there is a Plan B concept that would show how if it were stubbed to the north -- Schultz: It wouldn't look very good, I will tell you that. From a development standpoint. And you got to trust me on that. I know that, you know, you like to see it, it would just -- just the inefficiency it just -- it just kind of blows up. But we could do it. Borton: Well -- and, Madam Mayor, to that point, if that's the case, it would be helpful to see, because it doesn't make sense for us to sit here and say -- Schultz: It could help us. Borton: -- drop a stub to the north -- Schultz: It could help us. I know. It might help us not have to provide a stub if it doesn't work very well, so -- Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 61 of 76 Borton: Yeah. Schultz: No. Borton: I don't want you to -- Schultz: As far as it reflects to our layout, we basically have three lots on the north. We have two and just have that road running straight north and it would still have an opportunity to go to -- to the west as well. It would be, essentially, a four way intersection right there, instead of a T is what that would be. That's the only way to do it to get it in there. And so you would lose the one lot and have nine instead of ten, and provide for two different ways to get to that -- that -- a way to get the property to the west, as well as a way to get to the property to the north. It just -- it just gets real inefficient. You know, whether you guys care if it's inefficient or not I don't know, but it just doesn't look as slick as this does, I know that. You know, how it's going to be, so -- De Weerd: So, is the desire to continue this with -- to see what that alternative plan would look like? Borton: Madam Mayor, to me it is. I -- again, Matt, I don't want to put you in a hard spot on this, but the alternative would be to -- to approve it and ask you to stub it to the north, kind of winging it on how -- what you envision to be the challenges, would actually be understood by us. Schultz: And I don't know if cost is a -- is a concern for you and inefficiency and -- I mean just for us putting in an extra stub street is, obviously, we lose a lot and you have the extra sewer and water, pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk. You know, a huge -- huge impact to a very small site. That's the one right off the top. Secondly, with an efficiently layout, those development costs go -- go high per lot and it just starts -- it just starts not looking as good. I mean we would do this one, anything else, it's like, you know, you only have 18 -- or 17 lots and, you know, there is more road per lot and, you know, there is just some criteria that I don't know how you're going to judge me on it , you know, get judged on inefficiency, is it going to get judged on, you know, per lot cost and -- and from our standpoint it would be a major -- major hurt to our property to extend that to the north. Borton: Okay. De Weerd: It's a major hit to the property to the north not having access and being landlocked. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 62 of 76 Schultz: He's not landlocked. He's got access to the driveway, you know. Yeah. Borton: The development potential is more limited absent the stub to the north. I think. Not technically landlocked, but constrained from a development perspective. It's why we stub often to the next -- Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: If we stub it to the north there is not much room between it and the ditch. Milam: Yes. Bird: But in the same -- and in the same token that north property is going to only be designed one way or -- and it's probably not going to be -- the other -- the way Matt's drawn it is we have got to have -- whoever does it has got to have all the property. I mean you're going through the property to the west and, then, you're going to the north. I hate to land lock anybody, but my -- my preference would be to -- to take and where that hits the property line just stub it in as a road and we have done this many times on the through roads and, then, just put a barrier up there future road. Milam: Right here. Bird: Right there. De Weerd: Any other questions for the applicant? Borton: Madam Mayor, I -- I only bring it up -- I don't know where -- what else is it on that particular issue and I don't know if there is an alternative means that -- if it's left vacant for a future road that if the other parcels were to come in it could, then, be abandoned and became a buildable lot again. Maybe making it more of an issue, but does that make sense? De Weerd: Okay. Anything else from Council? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 63 of 76 Milam: I'm still -- I'm just getting more confused I guess with this whole land locking discussion. Matt's saying they are not like landlocked and you guys are saying that it looks like they are landlocked. So, how can I make a decision if I don't understand the -- De Weerd: Because ACHD will not let that northern lot access out onto Black Cat, so the only access they would have is through this lot or as the applicant conceptually drew out , which would necessitate two other parcels developing to even get access. So, I think that's -- that's the issue at hand. Schultz: If I could, Mayor and Council, make an executive decision here and -- and just go ahead and put a condition on us that we provide a stub street to the north on -- on that north of the property line. W hat we would do is we would just kind of shift the road over a little bit and do two-thirds on one side and have a T -- a T right here. And so that will -- that will have some flexibility on whether that road just kind of continues north or -- or it will provide a way for this guy to still develop in the interim if he wants to first . So -- so, I'm willing to make that change. Hopefully we don't have to -- you know, we can just make that a condition of approval of the final plat that we have a stub street to the north and if we have to lose a lot, so be it. If we can do it without losing a lot, great, but I think we are going to lose a lot to do it. So, that's just how it goes. If that would facilitate this moving forward, I'm just going to make that decision, because I think that's wise at this point. De Weerd: Mr. Palmer? It's very rare that Council approves a plat without seeing it. That would be a concern. And I'm sure staff is very competent, but they don't like having all of that on them. They like to see what -- that Council sees what they are approving. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Putting words in everyone's mouth. Mr. Palmer. Palmer: I -- I'm looking at the property at Amity and Eagle, somewhat similar situation. Because of the roundabout there is no way for the guy that lives there on the corner to be able to connect to either Amity or Eagle, despite how bad he wanted to take advantage of the value of his property, but when you sit on your hands and everyone around you develops and you don't buy up any of that property, then, you can't stop what happens around you when you don't own it and so I feel like this makes sense. It allows to be able to connect there when it gets developed. In the meantime they can keep on keeping on as they are or they can decide to take advantage now or later, but everyone else can't just sit on their hands while somebody else decides to. I really hate to -- to tell somebody Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 64 of 76 you're not allowed to make as much money on your property, because somebody around you doesn't want to do anything yet. So, while he's wanting to go ahead and make his decision, I think as it's presented before us it makes sense and I don't know if anyone -- we have got three of us that have chimed in and I don't know if the other three want to before we decide on making motions or whatnot. De Weerd: Mr. Palmer, it has been said that that property is for sale, so -- Palmer: Okay. De Weerd: -- so they are trying to do something, but if you don't give them access they're not going to be able to. That's -- that's the head scratcher there. Palmer: And which one exactly is for sale? De Weerd: The northern piece. Schwartz: The triangular piece. Palmer: That doesn't gain access from the -- De Weerd: No. You would have to get access through these two lots. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Isn't he the same guy that sold this property to these people? He should have got himself an easement. And here we thought it was an easy thing. Geez, Matt. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Kudos to Councilman Palmer for recalling the Luke farm out at Eagle and Amity and I do see some -- De Weerd: It's a pig farm. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 65 of 76 Cavener: What I call it. The Luke Farm as opposed to a pig farm. That's -- I see a lot of similarities here and I -- Council Member Palmer brought up a very, very good point. I'm not going to be one to ask the applicant to give up one of very few lots for potential -- and in a way I think that's not the council member I want to be. I don't see this property being landlocked. Maybe you were seeing things differently than I am, but to ask this applicant to give up one lot when there is not much there to begin with and the upside being annexing another piece of these enclaves and pull up the Swiss cheese that's in the county, to me seems like a benefit. So, I'm supportive of the application as is. I wouldn't ask you to change it. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: I move we close the public hearing on H-2017-0041. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: I move we approve H-2017-0041 as presented. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: That includes leaving Eight Mile Lateral open? Palmer: Correct. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 66 of 76 Borton: Okay. De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, nay. De Weerd: Okay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE NAY. Item 10: Department Reports A. Fire Department: Public Education Budget Amendment Not-to- Exceed $13,830 De Weerd: Okay. Item 10-A is under our Fire Department and I assume this is Deputy Chief Bongiorno. Bongiorno: Well, thank you Mayor and City Council. I know it's -- Chief Palmer was a great fire -- fire marshal. I have big shoes to fill. What we have before you tonight is a budget amendment. As you know, Pam Orr, our public education specialist, gets donations throughout the year for her public education events and stuff that she does , so this is just a formalized taking of those donations and putting them into a line item budget to where she can actually access that money and spend it. Unfortunately, in September there was a coding error done where the Idaho Fire Chiefs gave a grant of 2,500 dollars to Pam and it was coded in FY-16 instead of FY-17. So, the total amendment request is 2,500 dollars and, then, the additional 11,330 dollars is there, it's just a request to move it to where she can access it and spend it. De Weerd: Very good. Thank you, Joe. Bongiorno: Any questions from Council? Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Okay. Cavener: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 67 of 76 De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I move we approve the public education budget for a not to exceed amount of 13,830 bucks. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 10 -A. Any discussion from Council? Mr. Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. B. Legal: To Consider an Approval Letter Required by the Public Finance\ Authority of Wisconsin for Taxable Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds for the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine (ICOM) De Weerd: All right. We got it. 10-B is under our Legal Department and I will turn this over to Mr. Nary. Nary: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of Council. I have a one hour presentation. It shouldn't be that bad. Actually, we have a letter that's in the packet in front of you. I think there is a gentleman here to answer questions about it. Similar to the TEFRA hearing that we have done for other types of entities, this is a Wisconsin public authority is issuing some bonds, they need to have assurance that the city is approval of the process that they are following. The city isn't approving the bonds and the city has no legal or monetary obligation to the bonds, but they are required to sign off on it. Mr. Baird from my office has been in contact with -- probably with this gentleman that's here and -- Mr. Fullerton, is that right? De Weerd: Mr. Hastings. Dr. Hastings. Nary: Oh. Dr. Hastings. So -- and they are with their counsel and he -- his opinion of their counsel was that the Mayor could sign this alone. Because of the nature of it and Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 68 of 76 the amount and the obligation -- or the approval that we are granting, Ted and I both felt more comfortable that the Council see this and also basically approve the Mayor signing this letter and moving forward. So, if you have any other questions I think you would have to ask -- De Weerd: Dr. Hastings. Nary: -- Dr. Hastings. De Weerd: Mr. Hasty. Robert, do you have anything you want to add? Okay. Council, any questions for Dr. Hastings? Bird: I have none. Mr. Borton, you're over legal. Borton: Anybody in the public want to speak to it? De Weerd: Is there anyone in the public who would like to speak to this? No? Okay. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I move that we approve 10-B. To approve the letter required and have you sign it. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Thank you for waiting hours for that. Cavener: Does he have a City of Meridian pin? I feel like if he sits through it he should get one. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 69 of 76 C. Amended onto agenda: Mayor’s Office: Acceptance of City Survey Results De Weerd: Dr. Hastings, I will give you a City of Meridian pin, because I do think you deserve it after sitting through this. And 10 -C is under the Mayor's office. Council, you do have the city survey results and I hope you enjoyed reading with -- enjoyable reading. I would ask if you have any questions. If not, we would like it if you could officially accept these results. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Got any discussion? If not, I would make a motion that we accept the city survey results. Milam: Second. Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. If there is no discussion, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 11: Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 17-1734: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(C)(1), SPECIFYING EXCEPTIONS TO GENERAL USE ZONE AMENITIES STANDARDS; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8- 1-3(D)(3), ALLOWING BARRIERS TO BE AFFIXED TO SIDEWALKS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE; AND PROVIDING AN Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 70 of 76 EFFECTIVE DATE. De Weerd: Item 11-A is Ordinance 17-1734. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, read this by title. Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 17-1734: An ordinance amending Meridian City Code Section 8 -1-3(c)(1), specifying exceptions to general use zone amenities standards; amending Meridian City Code Section 8-1-3(d)(3), allowing barriers to be affixed to sidewalks in the downtown core; and providing an effective date. Bird: You have heard the ordinance read by title only. Is there anybody in the audience that would like to hear it read in its entirety? Seeing none, I would entertain a motion. Milam: Mr. President? Bird: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 17-1734 with suspension of rules. Little Roberts: Second. Bird: I have a motion to approve with a second. Mr. Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. B. Amended onto agenda: Ordinance No. 17-1732B: AN ORDINANCE (H-2016-0027 MAVERIK) FOR ANNEXATION FOR PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT “A” AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LANDS FROM C-2 TO C-G Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 71 of 76 (GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LANDS FROM C-2 TO C-G (GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Bird: We go to Item B. Mr. Clerk, would you read that by title only. Coles: Thank you, Mr. President. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 17-1732B, an ordinance file number H-2017-0027, Maverik, for annexation for part of the northeast quarter of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as described in Attachment “A” and annexing certain lands and territory, situated in Ada county, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the city of Meridian as requested by the City of Meridian; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of said lands from C-2 to C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial District) in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing for a summary of the ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an effective date. Bird: You heard the ordinance read by title only. Is there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? Seeing none, I would entertain a motion. Milam: Mr. President? Bird: Mrs. Milam. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 72 of 76 Milam: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 17-1732B with suspension of rules. Little Roberts: Second. Bird: Have a motion to approve and second. Mr. Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Robert s, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 12: Future Meeting Topics Bird: Council, any future meeting topics? Cavener: Mr. President? Bird: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I don't know who to ask, because we are missing some -- some folks, but I was just hoping to get some clarification on next week's meeting. I think we have a meeting on the strategic plan for 4:00. I just was getting clarification if we are doing the budgetary piece first -- so, our meeting still is at 4:00, amending the agenda to include the last two or the remaining member -- remaining pieces of the budget. Bird: Mr. Cavener, as I understood it, we were going to amend the -- the agenda -- meeting agenda to include those two items that we didn't get on the budget today. That start and, then, we will do the strategic, am I not right, Mayor? De Weerd: And they would be the first two items starting at 4:00. Cavener: Great. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Palmer. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 73 of 76 Palmer: While we are talking about next week's meeting, May we have access to the -- the new beautiful software to be able to have some time to go over every level of everything before we have the meeting and discuss it? De Weerd: I -- I don't know. You -- you got -- did that update go out? Holman: Madam Mayor, you're referring to the e-mails that we exchanged yesterday? De Weerd: Was it just yesterday? Holman: I think it was yesterday. I sent you back a question just clarifying that I was supposed to send that report to directors and Council. De Weerd: Yes. Holman: Okay. I will send that out. De Weerd: Okay. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: It's me Mr. Cavener all night long. Just for -- De Weerd: It is getting late. Cavener: Just for clarification. That's okay. It's been a long day. So, just for clarification, then, we will have access to the software tool before next Tuesday's meeting or -- De Weerd: The report has everything in it. I don't know what in addition you have, other than I guess it would show the completed tasks. So, yes. Cavener: Yes? Great. De Weerd: Is that available? Holman: Madam Mayor, yes, it is available. I just have to do a request to IT to have them turn it on and set it out -- they have set it up, but it hasn't been sent out to everybody. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 74 of 76 De Weerd: So, all the issues with the percentages have all been cleaned up? Holman: Yes. De Weerd: Okay. Cavener: Great. Thank you. Palmer: Awesome. De Weerd: Okay. Oh. This week is Dairy Days events. Pancake feed Thursday at 4:00 in Storey Park. Parade Friday at 6:45. Art show on Saturday at 9:00. Youth Farmers Market from 9:00 to noon on Saturday and the Lions Rodeo Saturday and Sunday. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: And the pancake feed is at the Merchant building at the speedway, not at Storey Park. De Weerd: What? Bird: Yeah. We moved it back up there. Cavener: Fantastic. Bird: And did you say about the art show on Saturday? De Weerd: Yes. Bird: Okay. Item 13: Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(b): To consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against, a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent and 74-206(f): To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 75 of 76 De Weerd: I did. If there is nothing further under Item 12, Item 13 is Executive Session. Do I have a motion? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we go into Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 74-206(b) and (f). Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn into Executive Session. Mr. Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (9:11 p.m. to 10:32 p.m.) Bird: I move we come out of Executive Session. Milam: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Bird: I move we adjourn. Milam: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor? All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:45 P.M. Meridian City Council June 20, 2017 Page 76 of 76 (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ��YY DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTEST: C. JAY(COLEW, CITY CLERK r w 'fDIA0 SL��L the Changes to Agenda: None Item #9A: Goddard Creek — H-2017.0007 Application(s): ➢ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ➢ Conditional Use Permit for a multi -family development in an R-40 zoning district. (Withdrawn) ➢ Conditional Use Permit for a self -storage facility in a C -C zoning district. ➢ Rezone ➢ Preliminary Plat ➢ Development Agreement Modification Size of property, existing zoning, and location: The subject property consists of 12.38 acres of land zoned R-4 at 2780 W. McMillan Road. Adjacent Land Use & Zoning: 1. North: Selway Apartments, zoned R-4 2. East: Residential property with a home, zoned L-0 3. South: W. McMillan Road and single-family homes in the R-4 and R-8 zoning districts 4. West: Vacant commercial property, zoned L-0 History: This property was granted annexation, preliminary plat, and a conditional use permit as part of the Lochsa Falls Subdivision in 2002 (AZ -02-010, PP -02-009, CUP 02-012) and has a development agreement (Instrument #102012598). The conditional use permit allowed for 11 office buildings to be built within the R-4 zoning district. The subject property was one such property selected to have office uses. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: HDR, Office Since the City Council hearing on May 23, 2017, the applicant has submitted a revised preliminary plat and landscape plan. The changes to the plat and landscape plan are as follows: The original plat included 22 building lots and 5 common lots. The revised plat is for 2 lots, one commercial lot for the proposed storage use, and one 5 acre residential lot. • Withdrawal of the Conditional Use Permit for a multi -family project. • The applicant is requesting that the development agreement be modified to allow the remaining 5 acre parcel to develop with the allowed uses listed in UDC Table 11-2A-2 for R-4. In addition to the changes to the preliminary plat, a revised landscape plan has also been submitted. The new plan depicts a 5 -foot wide detached sidewalk within a 25 foot landscape buffer adjacent to McMillan Road. However, the applicant is proposing to develop the project in three phases. Staff is supportive of phasing the construction of the storage facility however, staff is of the opinion that the applicant should construct the entire McMillan Road street frontage with a 5 -foot wide detached sidewalk and landscaping with the first phase of construction so there isn't a gap in the sidewalk on the north side of McMillan Road. Additionally, per UDC 11-213-3 and 11-3B-9, the applicant is responsible to construct a 25 -foot landscape buffer adjacent to any residential use or district. In summary, Staff approves of the revisions made to the plans but due to the proposed changes, staff is recommending the elimination of some conditions and the inclusion of others as follows: To be added: Except for construction of the storage facility, no building permits shall be issued on Lot 2 until a subdivision has been approved by the City Council. Lot 2 shall only develop with those uses allowed in the R-4 zoning district (UDC Table 11- 2A-2). 2. The 25 -foot wide landscape buffer and detached sidewalk along McMillan Road shall be constructed in its entirety with the first phase of development. 3. Modify 1.1.1e as follows "The site shall develop with a self -storage facility and multi family residential developments and shall comply with the specific use standards as set forth in the UDC 11-4-3-34 and 11 n 3 77 4. Modify condition 1.1.14 as follows: "Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the City of Meridian Architectural Design Manual. Windows aro required on all elevations that faro the „non play aFea, the basketball GGUq and any etheF areas used for Ghildren's reGFeation to allow views of these areas, All roof and wall mounted mechanical, electrical, communications, and service equipment should be screened from public view from the adjacent streets and properties. 5. Remove 1.1.1c 6. Remove 1.1.1f 7. Remove 1.1.4 8. Remove 1.1.5b, 1.1.5c, 1.1.54, 1.1.5e, 1.1.5h, 1.1.51, 1.1.5k, 1.1.51, 1.1.5m 9. Remove 1.1.6 10. Remove 1.1.7 11. Remove 1.1.8 12. Remove 1.1.9 13. Remove 1.1.10 14. Remove 1.1.12 15. Remove 1.1.13 16. Remove 1.1.14 Item #913: Geddes Subdivision (H-2017-0041) Application(s): ➢ Annexation & Zoning ➢ Preliminary Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 2.08 acres of land, zoned RUT in Ada County, located off the southeast corner of N. Black Cat & W. Ustick Roads. History: None Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: LDR Summary of Request: The applicant requests approval of annexation and zoning of 2.08 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district. A "step up" in density is requested from LDR (low density, 3 or fewer units/acre) to MDR (medium density, 3-8 units/acre) as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan without an amendment to the FLUM. A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 10 SFR building lots and 4 common lots on 2.08 acres of land in the proposed R-8 zoning district. The gross density of the proposed development is 4.8 dwelling units/acre with a net density of 8.9 units/acre which is consistent with the requested step up in density if approved. The minimum property size is 4,034 s.f. with an average lot size of 4,960 s.f. Access is proposed via the extension of a local street, N. Geddes Avenue, currently stubbed at the SWC of the site. A stub street is proposed to the west for future extension and interconnectivity. Because a roundabout is planned at the Blackcat/Ustick intersection, staff was concerned about how the properties to the north & west could redevelop in the future and requested the applicant submit a concept plan addressing this, which he did. The concept plan provides access to these properties and appears to meet UDC standards & Fire Dept. requirements. A common driveway is proposed for access to the 3 homes at the southeast corner of the development. The applicant is proposing 0.11 of an acre of common area adjacent to the cul-de-sac at the NEC of the site along the Eight Mile Lateral, which runs along the east boundary of the site. The UDC does not require qualified open space & site amenities to be provided for development that is below 5 acres in size; however, because the applicant is requesting approval of a step up in density, staff recommends a qualifying site amenity such as a picnic area with tables, benches and a shade structure or other qualified amenity, is provided as a provision of the development agreement. The applicant also requests Council approval of a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6 to leave the Eightmile Lateral open and not pipe it as required by the UDC due to its large capacity; the applicant guesstimates it would take at least a 48" pipe to tile the facility. Conceptual elevations were submitted for future homes within this development as shown. Building materials consist of horizontal & vertical siding with stone veneer accents. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Matt Schultz ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Mike Sorensent iv. Written testimony: Matt Schultz, Applicant's Representative v. Key Issue(s): Mr. Sorensen would like a stub street provided to his property at the north boundary of the site; he was also concerned about his irrigation rights being interrupted by the proposed development; he would like a gas line extended to his property Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. The request for a "step up" in density from LDR to MDR — they were in favor of the request; ii. Mr. Sorensen's concerns regarding irrigation delivery, access and easement for a gas line —they were in favor of the extension of a gas line. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Commission added a requirement for a gas line to be extended within a public utility easement to the north property boundary for use by the adjacent property owner. ii. Added a DA provision that homes within the development are restricted to a single -story in height and a minimum of 1,500 s.f. as proposed by the applicant Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. The applicant requests a "step up" in density from LDR (low density, 3 or fewer units/acre) to MDR (medium density, 3-8 units/acre) to accommodate the proposed development. ii. Approval of a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6 to leave the Eightmile Lateral open & not pipe it as required due to its large capacity Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0041, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 20, 2017: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0041, as presented during the hearing on June 20, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0041 to the hearing date of for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: ap p ITEM NUMBER: 5 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Public Forum Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum) MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: June 20, 2017 Item # Project Number: 5 Project Name: Public Forum- Up to 30 Minutes Maximum Pleaseour rint name For Against Neutral Do you wish p Y g to testifv (Y/N) Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: ITEM NUMBER: 6 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Proclamation for Year of the Lions MEETING NOTES l_ Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS The Office of the Mayor P R O C L A M A T I O N Whereas, Lions Club International was founded in 1917 and is celebrating their 100th anniversary and is the world’s largest service organization with over 1.4 million members in 215 countries; and Whereas, under the motto “We Serve” Lions Club empower volunteers to meet humanitarian needs, encourage peace and promote international understanding through participation in club activities in their communities; and, Whereas, Lions Clubs in Idaho have provided vision screenings for over 30,000 students; and, Whereas, the Meridian Lions Club was chartered on September 20, 1938 and the Meridian Roaring Lions Club was chartered December 5, 2016; and Whereas, the City of Meridian appreciates and supports the service provided by the Lions Club members especially in our local area as they give of their time, talents and resources to our community; Therefore, I, Mayor Tammy de Weerd, do hereby proclaim the year 2017 as Year of the Lions in the City of Meridian and encourage the citizens of Meridian to show their appreciation by supporting the Lions Club in their many activities. Dated this 20th day of June, 2017. _________ ______ Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Keith Bird, City Council President Joe Borton, City Council Vice President Anne Little Roberts, City Council Genesis Milam, City Council Luke Cavener, City Council Ty Palmer, City Council Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: �11im PIZ , 91D (71 ITEM NUMBER: 7A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approve Minutes of June 6, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council June 6, 2017 Page 112 of 112 Bird: Item 14 was vacated. So, I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Little Roberts: So moved. Cavener: Second. Bird: All in favor? Any opposed? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:49 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR TPS DE WEERD ATTEST: C.JAY 6OLEUCITY CLERK 6 / �o / �l � DATE APPROVED ,SED AUGUST 0 City of w E IDIAN�-- IDAHO SEAL ') DATE: � Meridian City Council Meeting n ITEM NUMBER: 7B PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0070 ITEM TITLE: Whitebark Subdivision No. 2 Final Plat for Whitebark Subdivision No. 2 (H-2017-0070) by BHH Investments I, LLC Located South Side of E. Amity Road, Midway Between S. Locust Grove Road and S. Eagle Road MEETING NOTES G✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting . ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0073 ITEM TITLE: Southern Highlands Subdivision No. 4 Final Plat for Southern Highlands Subdivision No. 4 (H-2017-0073) by Sky Mesa Development, LLC Located South of E. Amity Road and West of S. Eagle Road MEETING NOTES K APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS DATE: Meridian City Council Meeting ITEM TITLE: Caven Ridge Estates ITEM NUMBER: 7D PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0020 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Caven Ridge Estates (H- 2017-0020) by New Cavanaugh, LLC Located South of E. Victory Road and East of S. Meridian Road MEETING NOTES M APPROVES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0020 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for a Modification to the Development Agreement to Include a New Conceptual Development Plan for the Site; and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 93 Building Lots and 7 Common Lots on 32.59 Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning District for Caven Ridge Estates Subdivision, by New Cavanaugh, LLC. Case No(s). H-2017-0020 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 6, 2017 (Findings on June 20, 2017) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0020 - 2 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for a modification to the development agreement and preliminary plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0020 - 3 - agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of 0,A , 2017. COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD (TIE BREAKER) Mayor eerd VOTED_ VOTED VOTED VOTED V/4 VOTED VOTED 1 VOTED Attest: Q0��'" �o SOP 2' cilv of E IIS YAMT" C.J oles IDAHO Y City Clerk % SEAL FR or rn©TRePSJ�� Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: City Cleric's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0020 -4- EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: June 6, 2017 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP (H-2017-0020) I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANTS’ REQUEST The applicant, New Cavanaugh, LLC, has submitted an application for a modification to the development agreement (MDA) to include a new conceptual development plan for the site; and a preliminary plat (PP) consisting of 93 building lots and 7 common area lots on 32.59 acres of land in an R-8 zoning district. See Section VIII, Analysis, for more information. II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA and PP applications based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit C of the Staff Report. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on May 4, 2017. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject PP request. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Kristi Watkins, JUB Engineers (Applicant’s Representative) ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Dennis Bedient iv. Written testimony: Kristi Watkins, JUB Engineers (Applicant’s Representative) v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: Caleb Hood b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. Traffic impact of the proposed development on adjacent streets (Standing Timber & Victory) without Rumpel Lane being improved as a collector street out to S. Meridian Road/SH 69 (the applicant only has 25’ of frontage on Meridian Rd., which isn’t enough width to construct a public street). c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. The reconfiguration of the southern portion of the plat to comply with block length standards; ii. Concern that providing street frontage through the common area for the out-parcel where the existing home is located will reduce the amount of qualified open space (which currently exceeds the minimum requirement at 12.6%). d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Include a condition that street frontage via a local street is provided for the out-parcel where the existing home is located; direct access via Standing Timber Way, a collector street, is prohibited (see conditions #1.2.1d and 1.2.2f). e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. The ACHD Commission held a hearing for this project on May 24th and continued the project to their June 21st meeting due to concern the project won’t have public access via S. Meridian Rd./SH 69 via Rumple Ln. (only emergency access is proposed due to the lack of right -of-way for a public street). Staff spoke with ACHD staff regarding this matter and staff didn’t expect their draft conditions (included in Exhibit B, Section 7) to change as this property does not have enough frontage on S. Meridian Rd./SH 69 for a public street to be constructed. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 2 The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 6, 2017. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject MDA and PP request. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Kristi Watkins, JUB Engineers ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Brenda Walther; Brett Walther; Patrick Thomas; Dan Thompson, Thompson Engineers (Traffic Engineer); Justin Lucas, ACHD iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. Concern regarding the existing bird habitat in the copse of trees along the Ridenbaugh Canal that are proposed to be removed with development of the site; desire for the trees to be preserved for the benefit of the birds and residents in the area. ii. Concern regarding completion of this development without an access to S. Meridian Road/SH 69 via Rumple Lane and impact of traffic on E. Victory Road. c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. Access for the proposed development and the issue of no public access via S. Meridian Road/SH 69 until the property to the west develops to provide additional right-of-way. d. Key Council Changes to Staff/Commission Recommendation i. Council approved a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6A to allow the Ridenbaugh Canal to remain open and not be piped due to its large capacity. ii. Modification to condition #1.2.1 and 1.2.2 per staff’s memo to Council dated June 6, 2017. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0020, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0020, as presented during the hearing on June 6, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0020 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The subject property is located south of E. Victory Road and east of S. Meridian Road, in the northwest ¼ of Section 30, Township 3 North, Range 1 East. B. Applicant: New Cavanaugh, LLC 3327 N. Eagle Road, Ste. 100 Meridian, Idaho 83646 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 3 C. Owner: New Cavanaugh, LLC 2289 S. Bonito Way, Ste. 100 Meridian, ID 83642 D. Representative: Kristi Watkins, JUB Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Ste. 201 Boise, Idaho 83709 E. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information. V. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject applications are for a modification to the development agreement and a preliminary plat. A public hearing is required before the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on the preliminary plat; a public hearing is only required before the City Council on the development agreement modification, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5. B. Newspaper notifications published on: April 14, 2017 (Commission); May 19, 2017 (City Council) C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: April 6, 2017 (Commission); May 11, 2017 (City Council) D. Applicant posted notice on site by: April 21, 2017 (Commission); May 24, 2017 (City Council) VI. LAND USE A. Existing Land Use(s): This property is currently being used for agricultural purposes and is zoned R-8. B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: North: Single-family residential (Caven Ridge Estates & Silverwater Subdivisions), zoned R-8 South: Single-family residential (Reflection Ridge Subdivision), zoned R-8; and a storage facility, zoned RUT in Ada County East: Single-family residential (Reflection Ridge Subdivision), zoned R-8 West: Vacant/undeveloped property (future single-family residential), zoned R-8 C. History of Previous Actions:  In 2006, this property was annexed and zoned (AZ-06-015) as part of the larger Tanana Valley development; a development agreement was approved as a provision of annexation recorded as Instrument No. 106151214 and later amended (MI-07-011, Inst. #108065958). A preliminary plat was also approved but the property was re-platted in 2007 (PP-07-015) as Cavanaugh Subdivision; several time extensions were approved for that plat (TE-08-022; TE-10-005; TEC-11-005; TEC-13- 005). Since the preliminary plat for this project was approved, individual parcels within the preliminary plat area have been sold off and are now under different ownerships and are being developed separately, rather than as a single master-planned project as envisioned. For this reason, staff requested that the applicant submit a new preliminary plat for the remaining area south of the Ridenbaugh Canal owned by this developer that contains its own amenities.  Property boundary adjustments were recorded in 2005 (ROS # 7140); and in 2011 (ROS #9007) (PBA-11-009) for this property. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 4 D. Utilities: a) Location of sewer: Sanitary sewer mains intended to provide service to the subject development were installed in a previous phase of this development. b) Location of water: The subject development falls within two separate water pressure zones, and therefore will need to provide connections to each of those zones. c) Issues or concerns: Applicant shall be responsible for the extension of sanitary sewer and water mains to provide service. E. Physical Features: 1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The Ridenbaugh Canal runs along the north boundary of this site. 2. Hazards: Staff is unaware of any hazards that may exist on this site. 3. Flood Plain: This property does not lie within the Floodplain Overlay District. VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The subject property is designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) contained in the Comprehensive Plan. MDR designated areas allow smaller lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre (d.u./acre). The applicant proposes to develop the site with 93 single-family residential homes at a gross density of 2.82 dwelling units per acre (d.u./acre) and a net density of 4.14 d.u./acre consistent with the MDR FLUM designation. The proposed density is slightly below the density of 3 to 8 dwelling units desir ed in MDR designated areas, which will require approval from Council for a “step down” in density from MDR to LDR (Low Density Residential) for this property. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed use (staff analysis in italics):  “Require appropriate landscaping and buffers along transportation corridor (setback, vegetation, low walls, berms, etc.).” (3.06.02F) A 20-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Standing Timber Way and E. Rumpel Lane, both designated as collector streets, landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C Landscape Buffers along Streets.  Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, medium-high and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. The proposed low density residential development will provide another housing option in this portion of the City adjacent to existing low-medium density residential uses. Staff is unaware of how “affordable” homes in this development will be.  “Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets.” (3.06.02D) The UDC (11-3A-3) restricts access to collector streets when access is available from a local street. Access via local streets from the existing collector street (Standing Timber) is available for the proposed lots; therefore direct lot access to Standing Timber is prohibited. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 5  “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F) City services are available to be extended by the developer to the proposed lots with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21.  “Develop pathways to connect Meridian with Boise, Nampa, Kuna, and Eagle.” (6.01.02C) A segment of the City’s multi-use pathway system is proposed within this site along the south side of the Ridenbaugh Canal.  “Coordinate with irrigation districts to implement the proposed pathway network along irrigation canals, ditches, creeks and easements.” (6.02.02C) The applicant should coordinate with Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District for construction of the multi-use pathway along the Ridenbaugh Canal.  “Limit canal tiling and piping of ditches, creeks, and drains where public safety issues are not of concern.” (5.01.01D) The Ridenbaugh Canal runs along the north boundary of this site and is proposed to remain open and not be piped due its large capacity if Council approves a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6A.3 to allow it to remain open. To protect public safety, the canal should be fenced off with a 6-foot tall open vision fence having an 11-gauge 2-inch mesh or other construction equivalent in ability to deter access to the canal as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B.  “Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system.” (3.03.03B) Internal pedestrian pathways, as well as connection to an existing pathway stubbed at the south boundary from Reflection Ridge Subdivision, are proposed within this development for interconnectivity.  “Review new development for appropriate opportunities to connect local roads and collectors to adjacent properties (stub streets). (3.03.020) The preliminary plat depicts extension of existing stub streets through this property. Extension of the existing stub street (E. Mona Lisa St.) at the east boundary will allow connectivity between this development and Reflection Ridge Subdivision. In accord with the above-stated policies and goals, Staff feels the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the MDR FLUM designation if Council approves a “step down” in density for this development. VIII. ANALYSIS A. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: 1. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MODIFICATION (MDA): Development of this property is currently governed by the development agreement (DA) approved for the overall Tanana Valley/Cavanaugh Subdivision and later amended, which encompassed a total of 177+/- acres of land on the north and south sides of the Ridenbaugh Canal (Instrument No.’s 106151214 and 108065958). Because the parcels within this development were sold off individually after the preliminary plat was approved, it has not developed as a single master-planned project as envisioned. The property north of the canal is almost fully developed with multi-family and single-family residential homes. The property south of the canal, except for a 22+/- acre parcel on the west side of Standing Timber Way and the 4.51 acre parcel where the existing home is located, is owned by the subject developer. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 6 Most of the site amenities for this development were located north of the canal and those south of the canal were on the property where the existing home is located that is now under private ownership. For this reason, staff requested the applicant modify the previous development agreements for the sole purpose of entering into a new one and apply for a new preliminary plat with stand-alone common area and site amenities. Concept Plan: The applicant submitted a conceptual development plan included in Exhibit A.3 that depicts how the 47+/- acres owned by the applicant located on the east & west sides of Standing Timber Way is proposed to develop. The applicant intends to submit the preliminary plat for the property on the west side of Standing Timber Way (i.e. Caven Ridge Estates West) within 2 to 3 years – after construction of Phase 4 of the Caven Ridge Estates East plat. The overall layout is substantially the same as the previous plat for Cavanaugh Subdivision. A total of 6.49 acres (or 13.78%) total open space is proposed with 5.15 acres (or 10.9%) of that amount being “qualified” per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. Because this property is under different ownership and is developing separately from that to the north of the canal and to the west of Standing Timber Way (Parcel #S1130234045), staff recommends the existing DA (Instrument No. 106151214, amended Instrument No.108065958) is amended to exclude the subject property and a new DA is required for the subject property. The new DA should include the proposed conceptual development plan and building elevations included in Exhibit A.2 and require future development to substantially comply with those plans. It should also require site amenities to be provided as proposed. See Exhibit A.5 for Staff’s recommended DA provisions. 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT (PP): A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 93 building lots and 7 common lots on 32.59 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district. The plat is proposed to develop in 5 phases as shown in Exhibit A.3. The average lot size is 10,505 square feet (s.f.) with a minimum lot size of 6,955 s.f. in accord with UDC standards. Note: The configuration of the proposed plat is consistent with the previously approved plat for Cavanaugh Subdivision. Dimensional Standards: The lots in the proposed subdivision are required to comply with the dimensional standards of the R-8 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 and the block length standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3F. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and found it in compliance with the dimensional standards of the district, but not in compliance with the maximum block length standard of 750 feet in residential districts or 1,000 feet where a pedestrian pathway is provided. Block 4, which includes a pedestrian pathway, runs along the south boundary of the site and measures approximately 1,450 feet in length. City Council may approve a block face up to 1,200 feet in length where block design is constrained by site conditions that include an abutting urban project with no adjoining alley or street connections such as Reflection Ridge Subdivision that abuts the property to the south. The lots to the south abut this property for a continuous 1,260+/- feet from the east boundary to the west with only one pathway to break up the block face. Because this exceeds the maximum length allowed by approximately 250 feet, it does not comply with UDC standards and cannot be approved in its current configuration. Staff suggests the following revision to the plat: Reconfigure the streets in the southern portion of the development into two loops (S. Cannon Way/S. Daybreak Ave./E. Pisa Dr./S. Pisa Pl. and S. Standing Timber Way, S. Twilight Rise Way and E. Pisa Dr.). Common driveways may be used for access to lots (up to 6) off these streets as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. Implementation of this EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 7 change (or a similar change) will result in a block face length below 1,200 feet which, if approved by City Council, will comply with block length standards. Access/streets: Access will be provided via existing local streets from S. Standing Timber Way, a collector street, via E. Victory Road. Connection to existing stub streets in Caven Ridge Estates Subdivision No. 1 is proposed as well as to an existing local street (E. Mona Lisa St.) at the east boundary. Direct lot access via Standing Timber Way and E. Rumpel Lane, both collector streets, is prohibited; a note as such should be included on the final plat. (Note: E. Rumpel Lane will likely be re- named as Harris Street, consistent with that on the west side of S. Meridian Road.) This property has 25 feet of frontage on S. Meridian Road that currently exists as Rumple Lane, a private street, along the south boundary of the site. The Master Street Map depicts a collector street in this location and a 3-legged roundabout at the E. Rumple Ln./S. Windstone Ave. intersection. Access via the state highway (SH 69) is allowed by UDC 11-3H-4B at the half mile mark between section line roads as proposed. ACHD is not requiring the roundabout. A traffic signal is also planned for the Rumple (Harris)/Meridian Road intersection. Rumple Lane will be required to be improved as a collector street in accord with ACHD’s requirements but will not be able to be used for access to this development until more land is acquired from the property at the northeast corner of S. Meridian Road and Rumple Lane. Landscaping: Landscaping is required within the development as set forth in UDC 11-3B. A 20-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Standing Timber Way and E. Rumpel Ln., both designated collector streets, landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. A street buffer is depicted on the landscape plan along Standing Timber Way and along the north side of Rumpel Lane west of Standing Timber Way in accord with UDC standards. Landscaping is required in common areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E; along pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C; and within parkways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17E. A minimum 5-foot wide landscape strip is required on each side of the pathway planted with a mix of trees, shrubs, lawn and/or other vegetative groundcover (one tree every 100’ of pathway). The proposed micro-pathways comply with this standard; the landscaping along the north side of the multi-use pathway along the canal does not comply with this standard. The landscape plan depicts 20’ of landscaping on the south side of the pathway along the canal but no landscaping on the north side of the pathway; the plan should be revised to comply with UDC standards. The landscape plan also incorrectly depicts lot lines through this common area. Note: The curb, sidewalk and street buffer along the south side of Rumpel Lane will be required to be constructed when the property to the south (#S1130325752) redevelops in the future as dictated by the alignment of W. Harris Street on the west side of S. Meridian Road, per ACHD. Mitigation: The UDC (11-3B-10C.5) requires mitigation for all existing healthy trees 4” caliper and larger that are removed from the site. The City Arborist, Elroy Huff, visited the site and determined there were no existing trees that require mitigation. Sidewalks: Sidewalks are required to be constructed with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-17. A minimum 5-foot wide detached sidewalk is required along S. Standing Timber Way and Rumpel Ln., both collector streets; minimum 5-foot wide sidewalks are required along internal local streets as proposed. Sidewalks are proposed in accord with this requirement. Pathways: Pathways are required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. The Pathways Master Plan designates a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the south side of the Ridenbaugh Canal on this site; landscaping proposed along the pathway does not comply with UDC EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 8 standards (see Landscaping section above). Micro-pathways are proposed internally. Pathways proposed on the site comply with the construction standards listed in the UDC. Common Open Space & Site Amenities: Common open space and site amenities are required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3. A minimum of 10% (or 3.26 acres) qualified open space and one site amenity is required. A total of 4.10 acres (or 12.6%) of qualified open space is proposed consisting of parkways, the street buffer along S. Standing Timber Way, and an open grassy area over 50’ x 100’ in area; detailed calculations should be submitted with the final plat application(s). Amenities are proposed to include a swimming pool, (2) 18’ x 18’ structures connected by a roof in the middle containing restrooms, and a pool equipment and outdoor furniture storage room (see Exhibit A.2); large open area; playground equipment; and internal and multi-use pathways that are proposed to be shared by all Caven Ridge Estates residents. Because 37 building lots were approved in Caven Ridge Estates Subdivision that adjoins this site without any amenities, staff recommends the amenities proposed with this development in Lot 1, Block 2 are constructed with Phase I of Caven Ridge Estates East as proposed by the applicant. Parkways: Parkways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC11-3A-17E. Six-foot wide parkways are proposed along internal local streets. Root barriers are required with 6-foot wide parkways and Class II trees are required to be planted. If parkways are widened to 8 feet, root barriers are not required and Class I or III trees may be considered. Fencing: All fencing should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. A 6-foot tall vinyl fence is proposed around the perimeter of this development. The Ridenbaugh Canal is required to be fenced with a 6-foot tall, 11 gauge, 2-inch mesh or other construction, equivalent in ability to deter access to the waterway; the plans shall be revised accordingly. Waterways: The Ridenbaugh Canal is a large waterway that runs along the north boundary of this property and is proposed to remain open. The UDC (11-3A-3) requires waterways to be piped or otherwise covered unless improved as a water amenity or linear open space. Due to its large capacity, the applicant does not wish to pipe the facility; a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6A is required to be approved by Council for the waterway to remain open. Utilities: All development is required to connect to the City water and sewer system unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Services will be extended from Caven Ridge Estates No. 1. Street lighting is required to be installed within the development in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Pressurized Irrigation (PI): An underground PI system is proposed to be provided to each lot in the subdivision in accord with UDC 11-3A-15. The system will be operated and maintained by the Owner’s Association. Storm Drainage: A storm drainage system is required for the development in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City in accord with UDC 11-3A-18. Stormwater is proposed to be retained on- site in seepage beds designed by a civil engineer. Building Elevations: Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the future homes in this development as shown in Exhibit A.2. Building materials consist of a mix of stucco, vertical & horizontal wood siding with stone and brick accents. Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC): A CZC is required to be submitted to the Planning Division and approved for the swimming pool, structure and parking area in accord with UDC 11-5B-1. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 9 Design Review: A Design Review application is required to be submitted to the Planning Division concurrently with the CZC application for approval of the structure. The building elevations are required to comply with the standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA and PP applications as recommended by staff in Exhibits A.5 and B. IX. EXHIBITS A. Drawings/Other 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Phasing/Conceptual Development Plans and Building Elevations 3. Proposed Preliminary Plat (dated: 2/15/17 6/6/2017) 4. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 2/9/17) , revised stamp dated 5/30/17) 5. Development Agreement Provisions for Caven Ridge Estates B. Agency & Department Comments/Conditions C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map of Property Subject to Development Agreement D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 10 Exhibit A.1: Vicinity/Zoning Maps Victory Rd. Area subject to Development Agreement Area subject to Preliminary Plat EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 11 Exhibit A.2: Phasing/Conceptual Development Plans & Building Elevations Configuration of the plat has been revised – Phasing Plan only EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 12 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 13 Concept Site Plan & Elevation of Structure in Pool Area EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 14 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 15 Exhibit A.3: Proposed Preliminary Plat (dated: 2/15/17 6/6/2017) EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 16 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 17 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 18 Exhibit A.4: Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 2/9/17, revised stamp dated 5/30/17) EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 19 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 20 Exhibit A.5: Development Agreement Provisions for Caven Ridge Estates 1. Development of the subject property shall substantially comply with the conceptual development plan and building elevations included in Exhibit A.2 and the conditions of approval associated with the preliminary plat in Exhibit B. 2. The overall development shall include a minimum of 5.15 acres (or 10.9%) of qualified open space as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3B. 3. The development shall include at a minimum, the following amenities: a children’s play structure; swimming pool; structure containing restrooms, pool equipment room, and outdoor furniture storage room; a large open space area; internal pathways; and a multi-use pathway along S. Meridian Road and along the south side of the Ridenbaugh Canal in accord with UDC 11-3G-3C. 4. The site amenities (i.e. swimming pool; structure with restrooms and pool & outdoor furniture storage; parking lot and children’s play structure) in Lot 1, Block 2 shall be constructed with Phase I of Caven Ridge Estates East Subdivision. 5. The Ridenbaugh Canal is required to be piped or otherwise covered unless improved as a water amenity or linear open space unless waived by City Council as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6A. City Council approved a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6A to allow the Ridenbaugh Canal to remain open and not be piped due to the large capacity of the facility. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 21 B. Agency & Department Comments/Conditions 1. PLANNING DIVISION 1.1 Development Agreement 1.1.1 The existing development agreement, recorded as Instrument #106151214, and amended Instrument No.108065958, shall be amended to exclude the subject property. A fee of $303.00 shall be paid to the Planning Division after approval of the Findings by City Council. 1.1.2 The new Development Agreement (DA) shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6) months of the City Council granting the modification/new agreement. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the provisions in Exhibit A.5 and the conceptual development plan and building elevations in Exhibit A.2. a. A legal description is required to be submitted for the boundary of the area governed by the DA. This has been submitted and is included in Exhibit C. 1.2 Preliminary Plat - Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.2.1 The preliminary plat included in Exhibit A.3, dated 2/15/17 6/6/17, shall be revised as follows at least 10 days prior to the City Council hearing: a. Reconfigure Block 4 (and the associated area) to comply with the block length standards contain ed in UDC 11-6C-3F. Note: A block length of 1,200 feet requires approval by City Council as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3F.3b; otherwise the block length shall be limited to 1,000 with the provision of a pedestrian pathway as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3F.3a. b. Note #3: “All lots are residential building lots except Lot 1 of Block 2, Lots 2 and 8(?) of Block 3, Lots 21 and 18 of Block 4, Lot 1 of Block 5, Lot 1 of Block 6, which are common areas/drainage storage lots. Lot 1 of Block 1 is for the Ridenbaugh Canal easement.” The plat appears to be missing a common lot for a pedestrian pathway between Lots 7 & 8 and 19 & 20, Block 3 that is depicted on the landscape plan. c. Include a note on the final plat stating direct lot access to S. Standing Timber Way and E. Rumpel Lane/Harris St. is prohibited. d. Public street frontage shall be provided via a local street for the out-parcel where the existing home is located; direct access via Standing Timber Way, a collector street, is prohibited. e. Depict a minimum 15-foot wide common lot for a pathway between Lots 51 & 52, Block 4. 1.2.2 The landscape plan included in Exhibit A.4, dated 2/9/17 (revised 5/30/17), shall be revised as follows: a. Include a detailed calculations table that demonstrates compliance with qualified open space and landscaping requirements. b. Depict the reconfiguration of the plat as required above in condition #1.1.1a. c. Remove the lot lines depicted through the common lot containing the landscaping and pathway along the Ridenbaugh Canal. d. Landscaping is required along the north side of the adjacent to the pathway along the Ridenbaugh Canal in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. Trees and landscaping required along the pathway should be provided within the common lot, not adjacent to the building lots, unless otherwise approved through Alternative Compliance. e. Fencing is required along the south side of the Ridenbaugh Canal between the canal and the pathway as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B.3 to deter access to the ditch for public safety purposes. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 22 f. Public street frontage shall be provided via a local street for the out-parcel where the existing home is located; direct access via Standing Timber Way, a collector street, is prohibited. g. Depict a minimum 15-foot wide common lot containing a 5-foot wide pathway with 5 feet of landscaping on either side between Lots 51 & 52, Block 4, as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. 1.2.3 The developer shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6B. 1.2.4 A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application shall be submitted for approval of the swimming pool, structure and parking area prior to submittal of a building permit application for such items. 1.2 General Conditions of Approval 1.2.1 Comply with all bulk, use, and development standards of the R-8 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11- 2A-6. 1.2.2 Comply with all provisions of 11-3A-3 with regard to access to streets. 1.2.3 Construct on-street bikeways on all collector streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-5. 1.2.4 Comply with the provisions for irrigation ditches, laterals, canals and/or drainage courses, as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. 1.2.5 Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15, UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 1.2.6 Comply with the sidewalk standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. 1.2.7 Install all utilities consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-21 and 11-3B-5J. 1.2.8 Construct all off-street parking areas consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6 for non- residential uses. 1.2.9 Construct the required landscape buffers consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C. 1.2.10 Construct storm water integration facilities that meet the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-11C. 1.2.11 Construct all parkways consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17E, 11-3G-3B5 and 11- 3B-7C. 1.2.12 Comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to cul-de-sacs, alleys, driveways, common driveways, easements, blocks, street buffers, and mailbox placement. 1.2.13 Protect any existing trees on the subject property that are greater than four-inch caliper and/or mitigate for the loss of such trees as set forth in UDC 11-3B-10. 1.2.14 Comply with all provisions of UDC 11-3A-3 with regard to maintaining the clear vision triangle. 1.3 Ongoing Conditions of Approval 1.3.1 The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11- 3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 1.3.2 All common open space and site amenities shall be maintained by an owner's association as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3F1. 1.3.3 The project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances and previous conditions of approval associated with this site. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 23 1.3.4 The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 1.3.5 The applicant shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all pathways. 1.3.6 The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 1.3.7 The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11-3A-3. 1.4 Process Conditions of Approval 1.4.1 No signs are approved with this application. Prior to installing any signs on the property, the applicant shall submit a sign permit application consistent with the standards in UDC Chapter 3 Article D and receive approval for such signs. 1.4.2 The applicant shall complete all improvements related to public life, safety, and health as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. A surety agreement may be accepted for other improvements in accord with UDC 11- 5C-3C. 1.4.3 The final plat, and any phase thereof, shall substantially comply with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C2. 1.4.4 The applicant shall obtain approval for all successive phases of the preliminary plat within two years of the signature of the City Engineer on the previous final plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7B (if applicable). 1.4.5 The preliminary plat approval shall be null and void if the applicant fails to either 1) obtain the City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years; or, 2) gain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. 1.4.6 Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Division staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval 2.1.1 The subject development falls within two separate water pressure zones, and therefore will need to provide connections to each of those zones. The utility plans submitted with the application do not show a water main in S. Cannon Way. The S. Cannon Way water main must connect to existing water main to the east. Lots on E. Pisa Drive west of S. Twilight Rise Way cannot be served by pressure zone 4. Pressure Zone 5 water must be brought from offsite (existing main lines to east at the Reflection Ridge Subdivision, and west to Meridian Road) in order to serve these lots. Valves must be installed to enable pressure zone boundary (inline valve on S Standing Timber Way near the subdivision boundary, and valve on west side of E. Pisa Drive and S. Twilight Rise Way. 2.1.2 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272 2.2 General Conditions of Approval 2.2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub- EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 24 grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 2.2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-2-28C1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898- 5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 2.2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 25 2.2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 2.2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.2.18 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.2.21 Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 2.2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed public sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-221. 3. POLICE DEPARTMENT 3.1 The Police Department has no comments on this application. 4. FIRE DEPARTMENT EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 26 4.1 All common driveways shall be straight or have a turning radius of 28’ inside and 48’ outside and have a clear driving surface of 20’ in width capable of supporting an imposed weight of 75,000 GVW, per International Fire Code Section 503.2. 4.2 Fire Lanes shall have a 20’ wide improved surface capable of supporting an imposed load of 75,000 lbs. All roadways shall be marked in accordance with Appendix D Section D103.6 Signs – “No Parking” signs are required to be erected along the driveway leading to the swimming pool/common area on Lot 1, Block 2. 4.3 Operational fire hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs, and access roads with an all-weather surface are required to be installed before combustible construction material is brought onto the site, as set forth in International Fire Code Section (IFC) 501.4 and Meridian amendment to IFC 10-4-2J. 5. REPUBLIC SERVICES 5.1 Republic Services did not submit comments on this application. 6. PARKS DEPARTMENT 6.1 Developer shall construct a 10' multi-use pathway along the south side of the Ridenbaugh Canal per the Meridian Pathways Master Plan. A pedestrian easement shall be required with final plat. 7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (A hearing was scheduled before the ACHD commission for this application on May 24th and was continued to June 21st – a final report should be issued after that date.) 7.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval (DRAFT) 7.1.1 Construct Standing Timber Way internal to the site as a 46-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot wide detached sidewalk. Dedicate a minimum of 50-feet of right of way for Standing Timber Way. 7.1.2 Provide a permanent right-of-way easement for all public sidewalks placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. 7.1.3 Construct Rumpel Lane east of Standing Timber Way, abutting the site, as a 36-foot street section, with vertical curb, and gutter. Construct 5-foot wide (minimum) detached concrete sidewalk on the north side of Rumpel Lane. Dedicate a minimum of 40-feet of right-of-way for this segment of Rumpel Lane, extending to the southern property line. 7.1.4 Dedicate the offsite portion of Rumpel Lane west of Standing Timber Way to Meridian Road (SH-69) to ACHD as right-of-way for the future construction of the full public street. 7.1.5 Provide a road trust of $16,750 for the Rumpel Lane / Harris Street and Meridian Road (SH-69) traffic signal. 7.1.6 Provide a road trust of $38,700 for the off-site portion of Rumpel Lane to Meridian Road (SH-69). 7.1.7 Construct internal local streets as 33-foot street sections with rolled curb, gutter and 5-foot wide detached sidewalk. Dedicate a minimum of 37-feet of right-of-way for all internal local streets. 7.1.8 Construct Pisa Drive to intersect Standing Timber Way located 220-feet north of Rumpel Lane. 7.1.9 Extend the existing stub streets as follows into the site:  Standing Timber Way  Palermo Drive  Cannon Way  Sicily Drive EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 27  Mona Lisa Street 7.1.10 Extend the right of way for Standing Timber Way to the western property line a minimum of 50-feet wide in alignment with Pisa Drive, to allow for the future extension to the undeveloped site to the west. 7.1.11 Redesign the intersection of Pisa Drive and Twilight Rise Way to provide a minimum tangent length of 150-feet OR Redesign the intersection to a T-type intersection (intersecting at a 90˚ angle) and provide center landscape medians or chicanes on Pisa Drive. 7.1.12 Standing Timber Way and Rumpel Lane are classified as collector roadways. Direct lot access is prohibited to these roadways and should be noted on the final plat. 7.1.13 Payment of impacts fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit. 7.1.14 Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. 7.2 Standard Conditions of Approval (DRAFT) 7.2.1 All proposed irrigation facilities shall be located outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all easements). Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all easements). 7.2.2 Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right-of-way. 7.2.3 In accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non- compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant’s engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 7.2.4 Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 7.2.5 A license agreement and compliance with the District’s Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. 7.2.6 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7.2.7 It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 7.2.8 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District’s Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7.2.9 All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 7.2.10 Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy. 7.2.11 No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant’s authorized representative and an authorized representative of EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 28 ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 7.2.12 If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless a waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 29 C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map of Property Subject to Development Agreement EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 30 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 31 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 32 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 33 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 34 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 35 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 36 EXHIBIT A Caven Ridge Estates East – MDA, PP H-2017-0020 PAGE 37 D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. PRELIMINARY PLAT: In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: a. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to transportation and circulation. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section VII, of the Staff Report for more information. b. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property upon development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more information from public service providers.) c. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the developer at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. d. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based on comments provided by public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc.) (see Exhibit B for more detail). e. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. f. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: PZIJ ITEM NUMBER: 7E 0- PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0061 ITEM TITLE: Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 (H-2017-0061) by James A. Kissler, LLC Located 1303 S. Silverstone Way MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0061 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Short Plat Consisting of Two (2) Building Lots on Ten (10) Acres of Land in the C-G Zoning District for Oxygen Subdivision No. 1, by James A. Kissler, LLC. Case No(s). H-2017-0061 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 6, 2017 (Findings on June 20, 2017) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0061 - 2 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for a short plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 2017. COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Qo•- -'3." '\ Attest: o ` J Nf(11y of EIDIAN�- ID AHO C.jky Col vat" - SEAL City Clerk day Wl of , VOTED �t VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED t� VOTED `-Ol VOTED "J Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: V ( Aft Dated: Aityerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0061 - 3 - EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: June 6, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP (H-2017-0061) I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, James A. Kissler, LLC, has applied for short plat (SHP) approval of 2 building lots on 10 acres of land in the C-G zoning district for Oxygen Subdivision No. 1. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the criteria listed in UDC 11-6B-5, Staff finds the proposed plat is eligible to be processed as a short plat. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions and Findings stated in this report. The Meridian City Council heard this item on June 6, 2017. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject SHP request. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Tamara Thompson, The Land Group (Applicant’s Representative) ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. None d. Key Council Changes to Staff Recommendation i. At staff’s request, modify site specific condition #5, which requires Rackham Way to be vacated where it abuts the site, to allow it to remain open and be improved per ACHD standards or vacated. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017- 0061 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0061, as presented during the hearing on June 6, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 2 Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0061 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. PROCESS FACTS a. The subject application will in fact constitute a short plat as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-5B-3, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter. b. Newspaper notification published on: May 19, 2017 c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: May 11, 2017 V. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The site is located at 1303 S. Silverstone Way, in the SW ¼ of Section 16, Township 3N., Range 1E. B. Applicant/Owner(s): James A. Kissler, LLC 1125 W. Amity Rd. Boise, ID 83705 C. History:  In 1995, this property was annexed with a C-G zoning district as part of the development area for the I-84 Center. A development agreement (DA) was required as a provision of annexation to be entered into prior to the preliminary plat being approved and required all of the property to develop as a commercial planned development. A conditional use permit for a planned commercial development was also approved for a 700,000+/- square foot retail center but has since expired.  A property boundary adjustment (PBA-14-008) was approved on January 26, 2016, which adjusted the boundary of the site to include frontage on E. Overland Road (ROS #9885).  A development agreement modification application (H-2015-0024) was approved in 2016 that included changes to the original provisions of annexation to accommodate a new development plan (recorded as Instrument No. 2016-106278). VI. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed short plat depicts two 2 commercial building lots on 10 acres of land in a C-G zoning district. The property currently consists of one parcel of land. Both of the lots in the proposed subdivision comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G zoning district. This property has street frontage on S. Rackham Way, a local street; E. Overland Road, an arterial street and entryway corridor; and S. Silverstone Way, a collector street. Ada County Highway District (ACHD) is requiring the applicant vacate the portion of S. Rackham Way that abuts this site; however, a secondary emergency access for this site and adjacent properties to the west and north should be provided via Rackham Way at the south boundary of Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 (the abutting property to the west). A cross-access/ingress-egress easement should be provided between EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 3 both of the proposed lots and the adjacent properties to the west and north as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 3 for interconnectivity, emergency access and access via S. Silverstone Way. Street buffers are required to be provided along all streets in a permanent dedicated buffer or common lot, maintained by the property owner or business owner’s association, as follows: a 35-foot wide buffer is required along E. Overland Road; and, a 20-foot wide buffer is required along S. Silverstone Way. Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in UDC 11-6B-5 and deems the short plat to be in substantial compliance with said requirements to recommend approval as proposed. VII. EXHIBITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Short Plat (dated: 5/9/17) 3. Landscape Plan (dated: 4/20/17) B. Agency Comments/Conditions of Approval C. Required Findings from Unified Development Code EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 4 Exhibit A.1 – Vicinity/Zoning Map ÚÚd ÚÚd ººe SILVERSTONE TOWN SQUARE CONDOS PROJ AMD NO 01RIVERBIRCH COURTYARD CONDOS GOLDSTONE CENTER CONDOS PROJ AMD NO 01 C-G L-O R-15 C-G I-L RUT R1 RUT L-O R1 RUT R1 C-C L-O R-4 C-G RUT L-O R-4 C-G S E A G L E R D E OVERLAND RD §¨¦84 S W ERNER LN S L O D E R P L S R O L L I N G H I L L D R SARBORLN E CINEMA DR S S P E L M A N L N E GALA CT S C A T H E R I N E A V E E VIEW CIR S W E L L S A V E E WELLS CIR E B L U E H O R I Z O N DR E GENTRY WAY S J A D E W A Y E ONYX ST E GALA ST E TARPONDR S T O P A Z A V E S R A C K H A M W A Y E F R E E W A Y D R S B O N I T O W A Y S W E L L S S T S W E L L S S T S A L L E N S T S C O B A L T P OIN T W A Y S S I L V E R S T O N E W AY S J A D E A V E S W O R T H W A Y S T O P A Z W A Y 3N1E17 3N1E16 3N1E20 3N1E21 Fivemile Creek EightmileCreek Ridenbaugh Canal Ridenbaugh Canal Snider Lateral FALLON GREENS RESOLUTION NO 01 SILVERSTONE CAMPUS MAGIC VIEW AMD GRAMERCY NO 01 IRONWOOD NO 03 WYNDSTONE PLACE ENNIS KRAFT CONDOS LOCUST VIEW HEIGHTS SILVERSTONE BONITO NO 02 EDGEVIEW ESTATES NO 02 DORADO CRAWFORD PLACE VALENCIA PLAZA SILVERSTONE CORPORATE PLAZA CONDOS CLOVERDALE WEST JEWEL GRAMERCY NO 02 MIDVALLEY CENTER ROLLING HILL SILVERSTONE SQUARE CONDOS BONITO DESTINATION PLACE MAGIC VIEW GOLDSTONE CENTER CONDOS GALA PARK SILVERSTONE NO 03 CONGLOMERATE SNORTING BULL PHASE 02 OVERLAND WAY EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 5 Exhibit A.2 – Short Plat (dated: 5/9/2017) EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 6 Exhibit A.3: Landscape Plan (dated: 4/20/17) EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 7 Exhibit B. Conditions of Approval SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the annexation & zoning and development agreement (H-2015- 0024, Inst. #2016-106278) approved for this property. 2. The final plat prepared by The Land Group, stamped on 5/9/2017 by James R. Washburn, shall be revised as follows: a. Note #1: Include the subdivision name and recorded instrument number. b. Note #3: Include the name of the owner’s association. c. Note #8: Include the recorded instrument number for the 2017 license agreement and the name of the owner’s association. d. Include all of the recorded instrument numbers on the face of the plat that are missing. e. Depict a 35-foot wide street buffer along E. Overland Road, an entryway corridor; and a 20- foot wide street buffer along S. Silverstone Way, a collector street, as set forth in UDC 11- 2B-3, within a common lot or permanent dedicated buffer per UDC 11-3B-7C.2. 3. The landscape plan, prepared by The Land Group, dated 4/20/17, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a minimum 35-foot wide street buffer along E. Overland Road, an entryway corridor; and minimum 20-foot wide street buffer along S. Silverstone Way, a local street, as set forth in UDC 11-2B-3. b. Depict a minimum 5-foot wide detached sidewalk along S. Silverstone Way. 4. A cross-access/ingress-egress easement shall be provided between both of the proposed lots and the adjacent properties to the west and north as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3 for interconnectivity, emergency access and access via S. Silverstone Way and the traffic signal at the Silverstone/Overland Rd. intersection. 5. South Rackham Way that where it abuts this site shall be improved per ACHD standards or vacated as required by Ada County Highway District. 6. Prior to any development occurring in the Overlay District, a floodplain permit application, including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis is required to be completed and submitted to the city and approved by the Floodplain Administrator, per MCC 10-6. 7. Submit a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the north side of the Fivemile Creek to the Planning Division prior to signature on the plat by the City Engineer. Coordinate the details of the easement with Jay Gibbons, Park’s Department (208- 888-3579). 8. If the City Engineer’s signature has not been obtained within two (2) years of the City Council’s approval of the short plat, the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained, per UDC 11-6B-7. 9. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized, as well as the signatures of the Ada County Highway District and the Central District Health Department. 10. Provide a water main loop connection from S. Silverstone Way to the 16-inch main to in S. Rackham Way. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 8 ONGOING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 2. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 3. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 4. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11- 3A-3. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 9 Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 10 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 1 – SHP H-2017-0061 PAGE 11 Exhibit C – Required Findings from the Unified Development Code In consideration of a short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Mixed Use - Regional. The current zoning district of the site is C-G. The City Council finds the proposed short plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan and the dimensional standards in the UDC for the C-G district. B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services are adequate to serve the site. C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s capital improvements program; The City Council finds that the development will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. All required utilities are being provided with the development of the property at the developer’s expense. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services. The developer and/or future lot owner(s) will finance the extension of sewer, water, utilities and pressurized irrigation to serve the project. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of this subdivision and subsequent development; however, the City Council does not believe that it will be detrimental to the general welfare of the public in the surrounding area. The City Council finds that the development of this site will not involve uses that will create nuisances that would be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. F. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with the development of this site. DATE: Meridian City Council Meeting b ITEM NUMBER: 7F PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0062 ITEM TITLE: Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 (H-2017-0062) by James A. Kissler, LLC Located East of S. Eagle Road and North of E. Overland Road on East side of Rackham Way, North of the File Mile Creek MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0062 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Short Plat Consisting of Two (2) Building Lots on 4.72 Acres of Land in the C-G Zoning District for Oxygen Subdivision No. 2, by James A. Kissler, LLC. Case No(s). H-2017-0062 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 6, 2017 (Findings on June 20, 2017) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0062 - 2 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for a short plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 2017. COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Ta,2x1y e Weerd PQOIRpTED Ali(; Attest: G0 C-/►�l E� I IDIAN— IDAHO C&ay Co SEAL City Clerk `�2,� `,P� day of VOTED VOTED A VOTED A VOTED Yeo VOTED Y&F VOTED /`4 VOTED Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Q, Dated: lrJ� ityler s Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0062 - 3 - EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: June 6, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP (H-2017-0062) I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, James A. Kissler, LLC, has applied for short plat (SHP) approval of 2 building lots on 4.72 acres of land in the C-G zoning district for Oxygen Subdivision No. 2. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the criteria listed in UDC 11-6B-5, Staff finds the proposed plat is eligible to be processed as a short plat. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions and Findings stated in this report. The Meridian City Council heard this item on June 6, 2017. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject SHP request. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Tamara Thompson, The Land Group (Applicant’s Representative) ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. None d. Key Council Changes to Staff Recommendation i. At staff’s request, modify site specific condition #4, which requires Rackham Way to be vacated where it abuts the site, to allow it to remain open and be improved per ACHD standards or vacated. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017- 0062 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0062, as presented during the hearing on June 6, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 2 Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0062 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. PROCESS FACTS a. The subject application will in fact constitute a short plat as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-5B-3, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter. b. Newspaper notification published on: May 19, 2017 c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: May 11, 2017 V. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The site is located north of E. Overland Road on the east side of S. Rackham Way, in the SW ¼ of Section 16, Township 3N., Range 1E. B. Applicant/Owner(s): James A. Kissler, LLC 1125 W. Amity Rd. Boise, ID 83705 C. History:  In 1995, this property was annexed with a C-G zoning district as part of the development area for the I-84 Center. A development agreement (DA) was required as a provision of annexation to be entered into prior to the preliminary plat being approved and required all of the property to develop as a commercial planned development. A conditional use permit for a planned commercial development was also approved for a 700,000+/- square foot retail center but has since expired.  A property boundary adjustment (PBA-14-008) was approved on January 26, 2016, which adjusted the boundary of the site to include frontage on E. Overland Road (ROS #9885).  A development agreement modification application (H-2015-0024) was approved in 2016 that included changes to the original provisions of annexation to accommodate a new development plan (recorded as Instrument No. 2016-106278). VI. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed short plat depicts two 2 commercial building lots on 4.72 acres of land in a C-G zoning district. The property currently consists of one parcel of land. Both of the lots in the proposed subdivision comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G zoning district. This property has street frontage on S. Rackham Way, a local street. Ada County Highway District (ACHD) is requiring the applicant vacate the portion of S. Rackham Way that abuts this site; however, a secondary emergency access for this site and adjacent properties to the north and east should be provided. A minimum 20-foot wide gate with a Knoxbox padlock should be installed across S. Rackham Way at or near the southwest corner of this site; the applicant should coordinate the details of the access with the Fire Department. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 3 A cross-access easement should be provided between both of the proposed lots and to the adjacent property to the east and north as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3 for interconnectivity, emergency access and access via S. Silverstone Way. Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in UDC 11-6B-5 and deems the short plat to be in substantial compliance with said requirements to recommend approval as proposed. VII. EXHIBITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Short Plat (dated: 5/9/17) 3. Landscape Plan (dated: 4/20/17) B. Agency Comments/Conditions of Approval C. Required Findings from Unified Development Code EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 4 Exhibit A.1 – Vicinity/Zoning Map ÚÚd ÚÚd ººe SILVERSTONE TOWN SQUARE CONDOS PROJ AMD NO 01 VALENCIA PLAZA CONDOS MEDICAL MILLENNIUM CONDOS LOCUST VIEW HEIGHTS NO 02 GAUDRY SEEGMILLER TN-R C-G L-O R-8 R-15 C-G I-L R-15 RUT R1 RUT L-O R1 R-40 RUT R1 C-C L-O R-4 C-G RUT L-OR-4 C-G S E A G L E R D E OVERLAND RD §¨¦84 S L O D E R P L S R O L L I N G H I L L D R E GOLDSTONE ST ECINEMADR E PEWTER FALLS ST E GALA ST E B L U E H O R I Z O N D R E GALA CT S L U X U R Y L N EGOLDSTO N E D R E VIEW CIR SSPEL M A N LN EWELLS CIR E CADILLAC DR E GENTRY WAY S J A D E W A Y E ONYX ST E C O N TINENTALDR ETARPON DR S T O P A Z A V E S R A C K H A M W A Y E F R E E W A Y D R S B O N I T O W A Y S B O N I T O W A Y S A L L E N S T S W E L L S S T S W E L L S A V E S CO B A L T P O I N T W A Y S S I L V E R S T O N E W A Y S CELEBRATION AVE S J A D E A V E S M U S T A N G S T S T O P A Z W A Y 3N1E17 3N1E16 3N1E20 3N1E21 Fivemile Cre e k EightmileCre e k Ridenbaug h C a n a l R i d e n b a u g h C a n a l Snider Lateral FALLON GREENS RESOLUTION NO 01 SILVERSTONE CAMPUS MAGIC VIEW AMD GRAMERCY NO 01 IRONWOOD NO 03 WYNDSTONE PLACE ENNIS KRAFT CONDOS LOCUST VIEW HEIGHTS SILVERSTONE BONITO NO 02 EDGEVIEW ESTATES NO 02 DORADO CRAWFORD PLACE VALENCIA PLAZA SILVERSTONE CORPORATE PLAZA CONDOS CLOVERDALE WEST JEWEL GRAMERCY NO 02 MIDVALLEY CENTER ROLLING HILL SILVERSTONE SQUARE CONDOS BONITO SNORTING BULL PHASE 01 DESTINATION PLACE MAGIC VIEW GOLDSTONE CENTER CONDOS RIVERBIRCH COURTYARD CONDOS GOLDSTONE CENTER CONDOS PROJ AMD NO 01 GALA PARK SILVERSTONE NO 03 SNORTING BULL PHASE 02 ACCOLADE NO 01 DESTINATION PLACE NO 02 OVERLAND WAY EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 5 Exhibit A.2 – Short Plat (dated: 5/9/2017) EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 6 Exhibit A.3: Landscape Plan (dated: 4/20/17) EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 7 Exhibit B. Conditions of Approval SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the annexation & zoning and development agreement (H-2015- 0024, Inst. #2016-106278) approved for this property. 2. The final plat prepared by The Land Group, stamped on 5/9/2017 by James R. Washburn, shall be revised as follows: a. Note #1: Include the subdivision name and recorded instrument number. b. Note #3: Include the name of the owner’s association. c. Note #8: Include the recorded instrument number for the 2017 license agreement and the name of the owner’s association. d. Include the recorded instrument number on the face of the plat for the pathway easement at the southeast corner of the site. 3. The landscape plan, prepared by The Land Group, dated 4/20/17, is approved as submitted. 4. South Rackham Way that where it abuts this site along the west boundary shall be improved per ACHD standards or vacated as required by Ada County Highway District. 5. An easement shall be recorded that grants cross-access/ingress-egress between both of the proposed lots and to the adjacent property to the east and north as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3 for emergency access and access via S. Silverstone Way. A copy of said easement shall be submitted with the submittal of the final plat for signature by the City Engineer. 6. A minimum 20-foot wide gate shall be installed across S. Rackham Way with a Knoxbox padlock for emergency access at or near the southwest corner of this site; the applicant should coordinate the details of the access with the Fire Department. 7. Prior to any development occurring in the Overlay District, a floodplain permit application, including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis is required to be completed and submitted to the city and approved by the Floodplain Administrator, per MCC 10-6. 8. Submit a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement for the 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the north side of the Fivemile Creek to the Planning Division prior to signature on the plat by the City Engineer. Coordinate the details of the easement with Jay Gibbons, Park’s Department (208- 888-3579). 9. If the City Engineer’s signature has not been obtained within two (2) years of the City Council’s approval of the short plat, the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained, per UDC 11-6B-7. 10. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized, as well as the signatures of the Ada County Highway District and the Central District Health Department. ONGOING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 8 2. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 3. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 4. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11- 3A-3. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 9 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 10 (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 2 – SHP H-2017-0062 PAGE 11 Exhibit C – Required Findings from the Unified Development Code In consideration of a short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Mixed Use - Regional. The current zoning district of the site is C-G. The City Council finds the proposed short plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan and the dimensional standards in the UDC for the C-G district. B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services are adequate to serve the site. C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s capital improvements program; The City Council finds that the development will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. All required utilities are being provided with the development of the property at the developer’s expense. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services. The developer and/or future lot owner(s) will finance the extension of sewer, water, utilities and pressurized irrigation to serve the project. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of this subdivision and subsequent development; however, the City Council does not believe that it will be detrimental to the general welfare of the public in the surrounding area. The City Council finds that the development of this site will not involve uses that will create nuisances that would be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. F. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with the development of this site. Meridian City Council Meeting ITEM NUMBER: 7G PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0063 ITEM TITLE: Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 (H-2017-0063) by James A. Kissler, LLC Located 1260 S. Eagle Road MEETING NOTES � APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0063 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Short Plat Consisting of Two (2) Building Lots on 3.77 Acres of Land in the C-G Zoning District for Oxygen Subdivision No. 3, by James A. Kissler, LLC. Case No(s). H-2017-0063 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 6, 2017 (Findings on June 20, 2017) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0063 - 2 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for a short plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the _ day of L) 2017. COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD VOTED A COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED 1e4 COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED Y&! COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER VOTED Y(Wo COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED l/t`1,' COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM VOTED Yn MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Ta d eerd �pTED AU �QO ST O � Attest: E( 11yor IDIAN-- IDAHO 31. SEAL C.jay Col ��ti City Clerk rFRoj __..v````` Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By:t Dated: City Clerk's Office CITY'OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0063 - 3 - EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: June 6, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP (H-2017-0063) I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, James A. Kissler, LLC, has applied for short plat (SHP) approval of 2 building lots on 3.77 acres of land in the C-G zoning district for Oxygen Subdivision No. 3. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the criteria listed in UDC 11-6B-5, Staff finds the proposed plat is eligible to be processed as a short plat. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions and Findings stated in this report. The Meridian City Council heard this item on June 6, 2017. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject SHP request. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Tamara Thompson, The Land Group (Applicant’s Representative) ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. None d. Key Council Changes to Staff Recommendation i. At staff’s request, add a site specific condition (#8), which requires Rackham Way to be vacated where it abuts the site, to allow it to remain open and be improved per ACHD standards or vacated. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017- 0063 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0063, as presented during the hearing on June 6, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 2 Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0063 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. PROCESS FACTS a. The subject application will in fact constitute a short plat as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of UDC 11-5B-3, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter. b. Newspaper notification published on: May 19, 2017 c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: May 11, 2017 V. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The site is located north of E. Overland Road on the east side of S. Rackham Way, in the SW ¼ of Section 16, Township 3N., Range 1E. B. Applicant/Owner(s): James A. Kissler, LLC 1125 W. Amity Rd. Boise, ID 83705 C. History:  In 1995, this property was annexed with a C-G zoning district as part of the development area for the I-84 Center. A development agreement (DA) was required as a provision of annexation to be entered into prior to the preliminary plat being approved and required all of the property to develop as a commercial planned development. A conditional use permit for a planned commercial development was also approved for a 700,000+/- square foot retail center but has since expired.  A property boundary adjustment (PBA-14-008) was approved on January 26, 2016, which adjusted the boundary of the site to include frontage on E. Overland Road (ROS #9885).  A development agreement modification application (H-2015-0024) was approved in 2016 that included changes to the original provisions of annexation to accommodate a new development plan (recorded as Instrument No. 2016-106278). VI. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed short plat depicts two 2 commercial building lots on 3.77 acres of land in a C-G zoning district. The property currently consists of one parcel of land. Both of the lots in the proposed subdivision comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G zoning district. This property has street frontage on S. Rackham Way, a local street. Ada County Highway District (ACHD) is requiring the applicant vacate the portion of S. Rackham Way that abuts this site. A secondary emergency access for this site and adjacent properties to the north, east and south is required to be provided at or near the southwest corner of Oxygen Subdivision No. 2, south of this site. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 3 A cross-access easement should be provided between both of the proposed lots and to the adjacent properties to the north, east and south for interconnectivity, emergency access and access via the traffic signal at S. Silverstone Way/Overland Rd., as set forth in UDC 11-3A-3. Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in UDC 11-6B-5 and deems the short plat to be in substantial compliance with said requirements to recommend approval as proposed. VII. EXHIBITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Short Plat (dated: 5/9/17) 3. Landscape Plan (dated: 4/20/17) B. Agency Comments/Conditions of Approval C. Required Findings from Unified Development Code EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 4 Exhibit A.1 – Vicinity/Zoning Map EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 5 Exhibit A.2 – Short Plat (dated: 5/9/2017) EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 6 Exhibit A.3: Landscape Plan (dated: 4/20/17) EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 7 Exhibit B. Conditions of Approval SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the annexation & zoning and development agreement (H-2015- 0024, Inst. #2016-106278) approved for this property. 2. The final plat prepared by The Land Group, stamped on 5/9/2017 by James R. Washburn, shall be revised as follows: a. Note #1: Include the subdivision name and recorded instrument number. b. Note #3: Include the name of the owner’s association. c. Note #8: Include the recorded instrument number for the 2017 license agreement and the name of the owner’s association. 3. The landscape plan, prepared by The Land Group, dated 4/20/17, is approved as submitted. 4. An easement shall be recorded that grants cross-access/ingress-egress between both of the proposed lots and to the adjacent properties to the north, east and south as set forth in UDC 11- 3A-3 for interconnectivity, emergency access and access via S. Silverstone Way. A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted with the final plat submittal for City Engineer signature. 5. Prior to any development occurring in the Overlay District, a floodplain permit application, including hydraulic and hydrologic analysis is required to be completed and submitted to the city and approved by the Floodplain Administrator, per MCC 10-6. 6. If the City Engineer’s signature has not been obtained within two (2) years of the City Council’s approval of the short plat, the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained, per UDC 11-6B-7. 7. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized, as well as the signatures of the Ada County Highway District and the Central District Health Department. 8. South Rackham Way where it abuts this site along the west boundary shall be improved per ACHD standards or vacated as required by Ada County Highway District. ONGOING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 2. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 3. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 4. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11- 3A-3. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 8 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 9 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 10 the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. EXHIBIT A Oxygen Subdivision No. 3 – SHP H-2017-0063 PAGE 11 Exhibit C – Required Findings from the Unified Development Code In consideration of a short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Mixed Use - Regional. The current zoning district of the site is C-G. The City Council finds the proposed short plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan and the dimensional standards in the UDC for the C-G district. B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services are adequate to serve the site. C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s capital improvements program; The City Council finds that the development will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. All required utilities are being provided with the development of the property at the developer’s expense. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services. The developer and/or future lot owner(s) will finance the extension of sewer, water, utilities and pressurized irrigation to serve the project. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of this subdivision and subsequent development; however, the City Council does not believe that it will be detrimental to the general welfare of the public in the surrounding area. The City Council finds that the development of this site will not involve uses that will create nuisances that would be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. F. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with the development of this site. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: 4.AJDQ 90 , �),b 1-1 ITEM NUMBER: 7H PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0069 ITEM TITLE: Silverwater North Final Order for Silverwater North (H-2017-0069) by Trilogy Development Located Southwest Corner of E. Victory Road and S. Mesa Way MEETING NOTES L✓i APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR SILVERWATER NORTH SUBDIVISION – FP H-2017-0069 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JUNE 6, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF THIRTEEN (13) BUILDING LOTS AND ONE (1) COMMON LOT ON 4.12 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ZONING DISTRICT FOR SILVERWATER NORTH SUBDIVISION. BY: TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2017-0069 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on June 6, 2017 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING SILVERWATER NORTH SUBDIVISION, SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2017, HANDWRITTEN DATE: MAY 5, 2017, by MICHAEL S. BYRNS, PLS, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR SILVERWATER NORTH SUBDIVISION – FP H-2017-0069 Page 2 of 3 SHEET 1 OF 4,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department dated June 6, 2017, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Scott Wonders, JUB Engineers, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of -� U Ale 52017. Qp,ZEDA U r 0 iw c•ily or Attest: E IDIAN�-- IDAHO C.J& Coles Citv Cleric the By: Tammy de er Mayor, Cit f eridian Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: R'(Qktk4'�'� Dated: 6 - ✓ l ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR SILVERWATER NORTH SUBDIVISION — FP H-2017-0069 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 6, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bill Parsons, Planning Supervisor 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: Silverwater North Subdivision – FP (H-2017-0069) I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Trilogy Development, has applied for final plat (FP) approval of thirteen (13) building lots and one (1) common lot on 4.12 acres of land in an R-8 (medium density residential) zoning district. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Silverwater North Subdivision final plat based on the analysis provided below in Section V. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval I move to approve File Number H-2017-0069 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial I move to deny File Number H-2017-0069, as presented during the hearing on June 6, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0069 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The subject property is located on the southwest corner of E. Victory Road and S. Mesa Way, in the NE ¼ of Section 30, T. 3N., R. 1E. B. Applicant: Trilogy Development 9839 W. Cable Car St., Ste. 101 Boise, ID 83709 C. Owner: Corey Barton Homes, Inc. 1977 E. Overland Road Meridian, ID 83642 EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 2 D. Representative: Scott Wonders, J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Ste. 201 Boise, ID 83709 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts thirteen (13) building lots and one (1) common lot on 4.12 acres of land in an R-8 zoning district. The gross density of the proposed subdivision is 3.15 dwelling units (d.u.) per acre with a net density of 3.9 d.u. per acre. The minimum property size is 8,428 square feet with an average property size of 11,270 square feet (s.f.). All of the lots proposed are for single- family detached homes and must comply with the dimensional standards of the R-8 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and found it in compliance with the aforementioned dimensional standards. The qualifying open space proposed with this development consist of 6-foot parkways and a storm drain facility (Lot 7, Block 4). The street buffer landscaping along E. Victory Road and S. Mesa Way were constructed with previous phases of development (Silverwater Subdivision No. 3) and are not being reviewed and approved with this application. This landscaping must remain protected during construction on this site. Because the number of building lots is the same and the amount of qualified open space has not changed from what was approved with the preliminary plat, Staff deems the proposed final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. VI. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation (AZ-06-015, Development Agreement Instrument #106151214 and addendum #108065958) and preliminary plat (H-2016-0083). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by October 4, 2018, within two (2) years of City Council approval of the preliminary plat; or, apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized, as well as the Certification of the Central District Health Department and the Ada County Highway District. 4. The final plat prepared by J-U-B Engineers, Inc., stamped on 05/05/2017 by Michael S. Byrns shall be revised as follows: a. Notes: i. Note #12: Include the ACHD license agreement number. ii. Add Note: Maintenance of any irrigation and/or drainage pipes or ditches crossing a lot is the responsibility of the lot owner unless such responsibility is assumed by an irrigation/drainage entity or lot owners association. b. Easement Notes: i. Note #4: Include recorded instrument number for existing ACHD right-of-way easements. 5. The landscape plan prepared by J-U-B Engineers dated 07/12/16, shall be revised as follows: EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 3 a. Parkways are required to be constructed in accord with UDC 11-3A-17E. If 6-foot wide parkways are proposed, root barriers are required; depict a cross section of the parkway that demonstrates compliance with this standard. b. Lot 7, Block 4 shall be constructed (landscaped) in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11C, Stormwater Integration. c. All fencing installed on the site must comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7. d. Existing landscaping installed along the perimeter of the development shall be protected during construction on the site. 6. This development is subject to pay $1,465.56 per acre, to proportionally offset costs incurred by the City of Meridian for the Victory Road Gap Sewer Project. Payment of $6,038.11 ($1,465.56 x 4.12 acres = $6,038.11) must be received prior to obtaining the City Engineer’s signature on each final plat. 7. The homes on lots (Lots 3-5, Block 4 and Lots 10-12, Block 11) adjacent to E. Victory Road, shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials, color, modulation, and architectural elements (horizontal and vertical) to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. If single story homes are proposed on these lots, the design of the homes are exempt from this requirement. 8. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. 9. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 10. A Street Light Plan will be required with the submittal of the civil construction plans. Plan requirements can be found in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272 VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 4 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 5 set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Vicinity Map B. Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 07/12/16) C. Proposed Final Plat (dated: 05/05/17) D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 07/14/16) EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 6 Exhibit A – Vicinity Map EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 7 Exhibit B – Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 07/12/16) EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 8 Exhibit C – Proposed Final Plat (dated: 05/05/17) EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 9 Exhibit D –Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 07/14/16) EXHIBIT A Silverwater North - FP (H-2017-0069) PAGE 10 Bill Parsons From: Scott Wonders <swonders@jub.com> Sent: Thursday, lune 01, 2017 8:29 AM To: Bill Parsons; C.1ay Coles; Machelle Hill Subject: RE: Silverwater North Final Plat Staff Report for 06/06/17 CC MTG The staff report looks good and we are in agreement with the conditions of approval. Thanks Scott From: Bill Parsons[mailto:bparsons@meridiancity.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:34 AM To: Bill Nary <bnary@meridiancity.org>; Ted Baird <tbaird@meridiancity.org>; Andrea Pogue <apogue@meridiancity.org>; C.Jay Coles <cicoles@meridiancity.org>; Machelle Hill <mhill @meridiancity.org>; Scott Wonders <swonders@iub.com> Cc: Sonya Allen <sallen@meridiancity.org> Subject: Silverwater North Final Plat Staff Report for 06/06/17 CC MTG Attached is the staff report for the proposed Silverwater North final plat application (H-2017-0069). This item is scheduled to be on the Council agenda on 06/06/17. The public hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Scott - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (mhittCmeridiancity.org and cicolesCmeridiancity.org ) and myself (e-mail or fax) by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly by Thursday at 3:00 pm, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda. Bill Parsons, AICP I Planning Supervisor City of Meridian I Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 ( Fax: 208-489-0571 C, -�- �EII7F� IANY-- 1 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: XyJp oLL ( 9=6 t -7 ITEM NUMBER: 71 PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0067 ITEM TITLE: Little Creek Subdivision No. 1 Final Order for Little Creek Subdivision No. 1 (H-2017-0067) by David Alexander Located 1470 N. Locust Grove Road MEETING NOTES -9 APPROUR Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 – FP H-2017-0067 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JUNE 6, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF TWENTY FOUR (24) MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOTS AND FOUR (4) COMMON LOTS ON 8.19 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-40 ZONING DISTRICT FOR LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 BY: DAVID ALEXANDER APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2017-0067 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on June 6, 2017 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1, LOCATED IN A PORTION OF LOTS 19 AND 20 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION, SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2017, HANDWRITTEN DATE: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 – FP H-2017-0067 Page 2 of 3 4/26/2017, by MICHAEL S. BYRNS, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 7,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated June 6, 2017, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Kristi Watkins, JUB Engineers, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the a"O day of L)/\/(f 2017. o�QORPi ED AUG�sT� 01V r w Attest: �E IDIAN�_ IDAHO SEAL_ C.tay Col( City Clerk IPP By: '— Tammy de er Mayor, City_ eridian Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. Dated: � -c9l-/ ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 — FP H-2017-0067 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 1 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 6, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: Little Creek Subdivision No. 1 – FP H-2017-0067 I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, David Alexander, has applied for a final plat (FP) consisting of 24 multi-family residential building lots and 4 common area lots on 8.19 acres of land in the R-40 zoning district for the first phase of Little Creek Subdivision. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Little Creek Subdivision No. 1 final plat subject to the conditions noted in Sections VI and VII below. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the City Council. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval I move to approve File Number H-2017-0067 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial I move to deny File Number H-2017-0067, as presented during the hearing on June 6, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0067 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The subject property is located at 1470 N. Locust Grove Road, in the NW ¼ of Section 8, T. 3N., R. 1E. B. Applicant: David Alexander PO Box 7846 Boise, ID 83707 C. Owner: Little Creek Partners, LLC PO Box 190534 Boise, ID 83709 EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 2 D. Representative: Scott Wonders, JUB Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Ste. 201 Boise, ID 83709 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts 24 multi-family residential building lots and 4 common/other lots on 8.19 acres of land in the R-40 zoning district. A total of 96 dwelling units are proposed in (24) 4-plex structures. The gross density of the proposed development is 11.72 dwelling units (d.u.) per acre with a net density of 6.38 d.u. per acre. A total of 1.16 acres (or 14.2%) of qualified open space is proposed in this phase consisting of a common area where the clubhouse, plaza, tot lot, and dog park is located, half the street buffer along N. Locust Grove Road and open lawn area. A clubhouse with a gym and lounge area, swimming pool, dog park, pathways, plaza and 2 gazebos are proposed as amenities for the site. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the proposed preliminary plat (H-2016-0076) and found there to be the same number of building lots and common area as shown on the approved preliminary plat; therefore, staff deems the final plat to be in substantial compliance with the preliminary plat as required by UDC11-6B-3C.2. VI. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation, development agreement (Inst. No. 2016-109494), preliminary plat and conditional use permit applications approved for this site (H- 2016-0076). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by October 4, 2018, in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid, or a time extension may be requested in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by JUB Engineers, Inc., stamped on 4/26/2017 by Michael S. Byrns, shall be revised as follows: a. Easement Note #5: Include the recorded instrument number for the Settler’s Irrigation easement. b. Add Note: 2. Maintenance of any irrigation and/or drainage pipes or ditches crossing a lot is the responsibility of the lot owner unless such responsibility is assumed by an irrigation/drainage entity or lot owners association. 5. The landscape plan prepared by TTKLA, PLLC, dated 4/27/17, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict the site amenities on the plan. b. Include a calculations table that lists the width of the street buffer, lineal feet of street frontage and number of street trees required vs. proposed along Wilson Lane; acreage dedicated for qualified open space with detailed calculations; number of trees provided on common lots; and mitigation information for existing trees 4” caliper and greater that are proposed to be removed from the site that are deemed by the City Arborist to require mitigation. EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 3 c. Depict a 6-foot tall open vision fence, having an 11-guage, 2-inch mesh or other construction, equivalent in ability to deter access to the waterway along the Settler’s Canal/Jackson Drain in accord with UDC 11-3A-6C.3. d. Depict landscaping along all pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. 6. The following amenities shall be provided within this phase of development: a clubhouse with an exercise facility and lounge area, swimming pool, 2 gazebos, a tot lot with play equipment, a dog park (or open space), walking trails/pathways and a water feature at the entry to the development. 7. Submit a detail of the tot lot play equipment, gazebos, and water feature with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. 8. An encroachment agreement is required for those lots that encroach within the Settler’s Irrigation easement for the Jackson Drain along the south boundary of the site; or, the lots should be reconfigured sot that they don’t encroach within the easement. 9. All fencing installed on the site shall be consistent with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7. If permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release of building permits. 10. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. 11. Submit a 14-foot wide pedestrian easement to the Planning Division for the multi -use pathway along the southern boundary of the site prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Coordinate the details of the easement with Jay Gibbons, Park’s Department (208-888-3579). 12. Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual (ASM). Windows are required on all elevations that face areas used for children’s recreation to allow views of these areas, including those on Lots 12, 14 and 17 that face the common area on the adjacent development to the east. 13. The existing home and associated outbuildings shall be removed from the site prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 14. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. 15. The civil design plans need to include an in-line water valve on Wilson Lane, between the tap for the current phase and the tap for the future phase. VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 4 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 5 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. V. EXHIIBITS A. Vicinity/Zoning Map B. Preliminary Plat (dated: 8/16/16) C. Proposed Final Plat (dated: 1/12/17) D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 4/2/17) EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 6 Exhibit A – Vicinity/Zoning Map EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 7 Exhibit B – Preliminary Plat (dated: 8/16/16) EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 8 Exhibit C – Proposed Final Plat (dated: 1/12/17) EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 9 EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 10 EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 11 Exhibit D – Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 4/27/17) EXHIBIT A Little Creek Sub 1 FP H-2017-0067 12 EXHIBIT B Sonya Allen From: Kristi Watkins <kwatkins@jub.com> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 11:56 AM To: Sonya Allen; Barbara Shiffer; C.Jay Coles; Charlene Way; Machelle Hill Cc: Scott Wonders Subject: RE: Little Creek Sub. 1 - FP H-2017-0067 Staff Recommendaton to Council for 6/6 Mtg Looks good. We accept this staff report as written. Thank you, Kristi From: Sonya Allen[mailto:sallen@meridiancity.or�] Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 9:02 AM To: Barbara Shiffer <bshiffer@meridiancity.org>; C.Jay Coles <cicoles@meridiancity.org>; Charlene Way <cway@meridiancity.org>; Machelle Hill <mhill@meridiancity.org> Cc: Kristi Watkins <kwatkins@iub.com>; Scott Wonders <swonders@iub.com> Subject: Little Creek Sub. 1 - FP H-2017-0067 Staff Recommendaton to Council for 6/6 Mtg Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Little Creek Sub. 1. This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on June 6th. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Kristi/Scott - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (mhill@meridiancity.or , cjcoles@meridiancity.org, _cway@meridiancity.or , bshiffer@meridiancity.org, and myself (e-mail or fax) prior to the meeting. Thanks, Sonya Allen I Associate City Planner City of Meridian I Community Development Department 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 1 Direct: 208-489-05781 Fax: 208-489-0578 .�/("E ILI I v-- Nr' Built for Business, Designed for Living All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. This e-mail and any attachments involving J -U -B or a subsidiary business may contain information that is confidential and/or proprietary. Prior to use, you agree to the provisions found at edocs.jub.com. If you believe you received this email in error, please reply to that effect and then delete all copies. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: � � XjC\� aD t �)o l`1 ITEM NUMBER: 7J PROJECT NUMBER: H-2016-0132 ITEM TITLE: Una Mas Second Addendum to Development Agreement for Una Mas (H-2016-0132) with Una Mas, LLC (owner) and Chad Olson (Developer), located at at the southwest corner of E. Ustick Road and N. Records Avenue, in the northwest'/4 of Section 4, Township 3N., Range 1 E. The specific area of this request is located off the southwest corner of N. Records Avenue and E. Tecate Lane MEETING NOTES G✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-056982 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 CHE FOWLER 06/22/2017 12:32 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE 2" d ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Una Mas, LLC, Owner 3. Chad Olson, Developer THIS 2nd ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is dated this day of a_wul , 2017, ("2"d ADDENDUM"), by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho ("CITY'), whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 and Una Mas, LLC, ("OWNER"), whose address is 1717 E. Chisholm Drive, Nampa, Idaho 83713 and Chad Olson, ("DEVELOPER"), whose address is 12790 W. Telemark Street, Boise, Idaho 83713. RECITALS A. CITY and OWNER and/or DEVELOPER entered into that certain Development Agreement that was recorded on August 24, 2006 in the real property records of Ada County as Instrument No. 106137048 and the Addendum to Development Agreement that was recorded on November 2, 2016 in the real property records of Ada County as Instrument No. 2016-106279; B. CITY and OWNER and/or DEVELOPER now desire to amend the Development Agreement and the Addendum to Development Agreement, which terms have been approved by the Meridian City Council in accordance with Idaho Code Section 67- 6511. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be bound by the terms of the Development Agreement; however the Development Agreement shall be amended as follows: 5.1.13. A reduced buffer width on the C -G zoned property to residential uses is allowed from 25 feet to 5 feet i4th an additional 5 feet being provided along the north boundary of the residential property as approved by City Council in accord with UDC 11 -3B -9C2. Landscaping shall be installed within the collective buffer in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11 -3B -9C. All other provisions of the original. Development Agreement and the 4ddendilin to Development remain unchanges' 2°d ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - UNA MAS, MDA 14 2016-0132 Page 1 of 4 2. That Owner and/or Developer agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Property shall be subject to de -annexation if the Owner and/or Developer, or their assigns, heirs, or successor shall not meet the conditions of this 2',d Addendum, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian as herein provided. 3. This 2"d Addendum shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This 2"d Addendum shall be binding on the Owner and/or Developer of the Property, each subsequent owner and any other person(s) acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereon and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner and/or Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this 2"d Addendum if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed its obligations under this 2"d Addendum. 4. If any provision of this 2" d Addendum is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this 2"d Addendum and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 5. This 2"d Addendum sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition, and understandings between Owner and/or Developer and City relative to the subject matter herein, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or under -standing, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner and/or Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Second Addendum shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. a. Except as herein provided, no condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing development of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended within the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 6. This 2"d Addendum shall be effective as of the date herein above written. 7. Except as amended by the 2" d Addendum, all terms of the previous Development Agreement and Addendum to Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 2"d ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - UNA MAS, MDA H 2016-0132 Page 2 of 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNERS: Una Mas, LLC ATTES C. �ay Col City Clerk CITY OF MERIDIAN Mayor Ta iy e Weerd %G_ ItATEDq�CGs r ii�'Ui O W M IDjAN %. SEAL 11-j 2" d ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - UNA MAS, MDA H 2016-0132 Page 3 of 4 STATE OF IDAHO ss: County of Ada, On this Cf� day of�, 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said St te, personally appeared \,TO 1iC�_ l known or identified to me to be the melmlx ' of Una Mas, LLC and the person who signed above, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same oil behalf of Una Mas, LLC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above W Pe (SEAL) •`Q' •' •'• T / t� •��oTARY Notary Public for Idaho �•� s Residing at: My Commission Expires: W u% '. l' ••.....•• �`.• �`'••qTE OF STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: County of Ada, ) On 4t ' this 9 day of A c -t P , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Chad Olsen, known or identified to me to be the person who signed above, and acknowledged to me that lie executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the clay and year in this certificate first above written. `\`11111111////'' T (SEAL) �� JS SAN Notary Public for daho OTA •':`= Residing at: \-\'Q� — �. My Commission Expires • AUBUC' •.•per. STATE OF IDAHO 'j+i/OF ///111111111 ss County of Ada �) On 90 U 1� this day of '2017, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and C. Jay Coles, know or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument on behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNES�Sr P� have hereunto set ny hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate fr �w♦ (SEAL) ; Irl, �x i Notary Public f daho a �• Residing ♦ Commission expires: y��� _ NIC '' ♦� -� I d 2nd ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - UNA MAS, MDA 112016-0132 Page 4 of 4 STATE OF IDAHO M1 County of Ada, On this T day of , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared SQ4n , known or identified to me to be the W{'►� of Una Mas, LLC and the person who signed above, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of Una Mas, LLC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) �•�``�w nu���•,, P � OTAR y'• T� P�41 I V ll c Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: My Commission Expires: 0 Zb DATE: ITEM TITLE: Meridian City Council Meeting ITEM NUMBER: 7K PROJECT NUMBER: Memorandum of Understanding Between City of Meridian And Meridian Downtown Business Association: Art On The Street Event MEETING NOTES � APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS II. 2 4 3 It D. Compliance with laws. In performing the scope of services required hereunder, City and MDBA shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. E. Term of MOU. This MOU shall become effective as of the Effective Date upon execution by both parties, and shall expire on September 30, 2017 unless earlier terminated or extended in the manner as set forth in this MOU. F. Termination. Grounds for termination of this MOU shall include, but shall not be Iimited to: an act or omission by either party which breaches any term of the MOU; an act of nature or other unforeseeable event which precludes or makes impossible the performance either party's respective commitments; or a change in circumstances that renders the performance by either party a detriment to the health, safety, or welfare of the public or of either party. Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing seven (7) calendar days advance written notice of intention to terminate. Such written notice shall include a description of the circumstances providing grounds for termination. A forty-eight (48) hour cure period shall commence upon mailing of the notice of intention to terminate, If, upon the expiration of such cure period, cure of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination has not occurred, this MOU shall automatically terminate. G. Construction and Severability. If any part of this MOU is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of the MOU so long as the remainder is reasonably capable of completion. H. Entire Agreement. This MOU contains the entire agreement of the patties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. I. Applicable Law. This MOU and all activities occurring hereunder shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho. J. Approval required. This MOU shall not become effective until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and MDBA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. MERIDIAN DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: BY: L - Nick Grove, President, MDBA CITY OF MERIDIAN: GOP QpFtATEDq� GGs� of a Tammy cue"W erd, Mayor \m S 'D4Ho MOU BETWEEN CITY AND MDBA-ART ON Colel,City Clerk PAGE 4 OF 4 DATE: ITEM TITLE: Meridian City Council Meeting ITEM NUMBER: 7L PROJECT NUMBER: Resolution No.: A Resolution Accepting the Traffic Box Art Image Repository MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN BY THE CITY COUNCIL: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND MERIDIAN, ACCEPTING THE TRAFFIC PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. RESOLUTION NO. 1 -� — BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, MILAM, PALMER, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOX ART IMAGE REPOSITORY; AND WHEREAS, Meridian City Code section 2-2-2(A)(2-4) charges the Meridian Arts Commission ("MAC") with stimulating awareness and appreciation of the importance of publicly accessible art and its benefits to the community, encouraging the growth and preservation of the city's art resources, fosteringing the development of a receptive climate for the arts; and advising the City Council on the aesthetic aspects of works of art to be installed by the City of Meridian; WHEREAS, the City desires that public art will be a component of our community, and to that end, MAC issued the Call for Artists attached hereto as Exhibit A, seeking proposals for the inclusion of artwork in the Traffic Box Art Image Repository, a repository of images portraying artwork available for reproduction on vinyl wraps to be installed on traffic signal boxes in Meridian; WHEREAS, on June 1, 2017, MAC reviewed the responses to the Call for Artists, selected artists whose works are appropriate for inclusion in the Traffic Box Art Image Repository based on their respectively submitted proposals, and recommends to the Meridian City Council that such works, as depicted in Exhibit B hereto, be included in the Traffic Box Art Image Repository and available for reproduction on vinyl wraps to be installed on traffic signal boxes in Meridian; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council find that the proposed Traffic Box Art Image Repository, as set forth in Exhibit B, will serve the best interest of Meridian's residents, businesses, and traveling public; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the proposed Traffic Box Art Image Repository, attached hereto as Exhibit B, is hereby accepted and adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 201h day of June, 2017. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 20`h day of June, 2017. `j p,TEDgUG APPRO o�Q �s ATTEST: Cikvor ill W Mayor Tam d eerd IDIAN�.. C. y Cole ity Clerk -4 IDAHO 0 SEAL 104 Of rne 7REP`�V�� RESOLUTION ADOPTING TRAFFIC BOX ART IMAGE REPOSITORY Page 1 of 4 RESOLUTION ADOPTING TRAFFIC BOX ART IMAGE REPOSITORY Page 2 of 4 Call for Artists : TRAFFIC BOX ART IMAGE REPOSITORY OVERVIEW: The Meridian Arts Commission (MAC) seeks proposals of two-dimensional artwork to be added to a repository of images portraying artwork available for reproduction on a vinyl wrap to be installed on a traffic box in Meridian. As funding becomes available, MAC and/or a sponsoring partner may select a piece of artwork represented in the repository to reproduce as a vinyl wrap. Artwork included in the repository may not be selected for a traffic box wrap. A $300 stipend shall be available for artists whose work is selected for reproduction as a vinyl wrap to be installed on a traffic box, following execution of, and pursuant to, a written agreement with the City of Meridian and scanning of the original artwork portrayed in the selected image by City or City’s selected vendor. ELIGIBILITY: The Traffic Box Art Image Repository is to include original artwork by artists who live or work in Idaho’s Treasure Valley, created using any medium, so long as it can be represented in a high-resolution digital image without loss of integrity or quality. No artwork will be included in the repository which does not meet the selection criteria. Artists whose work is selected for reproduction as a vinyl wrap will be required to enter into a written agreement with the City setting forth specific terms and conditions of inclusion. Each person may submit up to three (3) images for consideration; a maximum of one (1) images per person may be selected for inclusion in the repository. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS: An artist wishing to submit an image for inclusion in the digital repository must provide the following materials and information to MAC in order to be considered for inclusion in the digital repository: • Completed, signed Traffic Box Art Image Repository Application & Acknowledgements form; • One-page letter of intent, including biography of the artist, in .pdf format; and • Up to three (3) digital images of original artwork proposed for inclusion in the digital repository, image file names must include artist’s last name and artwork title. E-mailed submissions may be sent to mac@meridiancity.org : documents must be .PDF and artwork images must be .JPG format. Hard copy materials (printed on 20 lb paper) may be submitted via U.S. Mail or in- person delivery, addressed to: Meridian Arts Commission Attn: Traffic Box Art Digital Repository Proposal 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian ID 83642 DEADLINE: This call shall be open until 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 19, 2017. SELECTION PROCESS: The selection of art for inclusion in the digital repository will be made by MAC. MAC will jury submissions at its regularly scheduled meetings, as they are received. MAC will notify selectees either by email or letter sent U.S. Mail. In evaluating eligible proposals, the following factors will be considered: • Quality of work; • Appropriateness of subject and concept for a public space; • Consistency with City policy and community values; and • Contribution to aesthetic and cultural atmosphere of the Meridian community. Artwork will be deemed inappropriate which portrays: content which violates copyright or other known legal ownership interest, profanity, obscenity, indecency, violence, pornography; discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or nationality; defamation or personal attacks. CONTACT MAC: Questions regarding this Call for Artists may be sent via e-mail to mac@meridiancity.org. EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING TRAFFIC BOX ART IMAGE REPOSITORY Page 3 of 4 Application & Acknowledgments : TRAFFIC BOX ART DIGITAL REPOSITORY Applicant: E-mail address: Mailing address: Physical address: Applicant phone: Day: Cell: Image title(s): 1. 2. 3. I hereby acknowledge the following stipulations and agree that if one of the images listed above is selected for inclusion in the Traffic Box Art Digital Repository, such inclusion shall occur subject to these general terms and conditions, as well as subject to other specific terms and conditions that shall be set forth in a separate, written Acceptance Agreement between myself and the City of Meridian. I specifically acknowledge and agree that: ____ A. All artwork submitted with this proposal for consideration for inclusion in the digital INITIAL repository is original work that I myself conceived and created in all respects. ____ B. Before work represented in the digital repository may be installed as a vinyl traffic box wrap, INITIAL I will be required to enter into a written agreement with the City of Meridian establishing the specific terms and conditions of such installation. No entitlement will issue or attach prior to negotiation and execution of such agreement. ____ C. Before work represented in the repository may be installed as a vinyl traffic box wrap, I will INITIAL be required to provide the original artwork from which the image was taken. If the original artwork is no longer in my possession, I will advise the Meridian Arts Commission so that the image may be removed from the digital repository as a potential option for installation as a vinyl wrap. ____ D. Upon submission of artwork to the City of Meridian for consideration for inclusion in the INITIAL digital repository, such submission is a public record, subject to the Idaho Public Records Act. ____ E. Artwork included in the digital repository may be removed from the repository, and/or the INITIAL repository may be deleted or discontinued, without notice to the artist. ____ F. The City seeks to encourage artistic expression and public dialogue, but must simultaneously INITIAL ensure that persons of diverse ages and perspectives feel welcome and comfortable in public spaces. To this end, only artwork meeting the eligibility standards described in the Call for Artists shall be included in the digital repository. I acknowledge and understand, and submit my proposal subject to, each and all of these terms and conditions. Signature: ________________________________________ Date: ____________________________ RESOLUTION ADOPTING TRAFFIC BOX ART IMAGE REPOSITORY Page 4 of 4 Artist First Artist Last Image Title Emily Aldape Dandelions Madison Baker Wanna Be Like the Cool Kids Cyndi Blue May Love and Light Surround You Lisa Bower Sunset at Goodale Cutoff Joyce Green Continuous Lambscape Andrea Harris Reserved Parking Kim Lock Redox III Karen Lowery Hazard Beauty Callie McGehee Northern Nights Scott Pentzer Indian Profile Tarey Potter Color Cloud Splash Brian Schreiner Boston Terrier Carol Smith Shady Chickens McKenzie Way Under the Sea Laura Yager In Good Company Bonnie Zahn Griffith Foothills and Fields EXHIBIT B 2017– 2019 Image Repository: TRAFFIC BOX COMMUNITY ART PROJECT Emily Aldape Dandelions Madison Baker Wanna Be Like the Cool Kids Cyndi Blue May Love and Light Surround You Lisa Bower Sunset at Goodale Cutoff Joyce Green Continuous Lambscape Andrea Harris Reserved Parking Kim Lock Redox III Karen Lowery Hazard Beauty The images shown here are cropped. To see the full image, please contact 489-0399 or mac@meridiancity.org Callie McGehee Northern Nights Scott Pentzer Indian Profile Tarey Potter Color Cloud Splash Brian Schreiner Boston Terrier Carol Smith Shady Chickens McKenzie Way Under the Sea Laura Yager In Good Company Bonnie Zahn Griffith Foothills and Fields The images shown here are cropped. To see the full image, please contact 489-0399 or mac@meridiancity.org Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7M PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Linder 4-Plex Pedestrian Pathway Easement MEETING NOTES 9 APPROYED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-056855 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 06/22/2017 08:08 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 0 day of �'�' , 2017, between 53 1►nve5� v►.�u�s t°.P ,hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple -use non -motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. Pedestrian Pathway Easement THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. BY: 5� e o e. S e L ww,a. Its: iM the i �eo� I v�a1 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this S✓— day of `Wto�� , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared 5A--bve 6o4mi)")T , known or identified to me to be the p"ne-✓ that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist abovexrittnnt,,,, t ny 9 y' �o r A NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO a , '}Residing at: 6 e1' o° � r ,Po 0 a 0 otomrnission Expires: t zol }��r UBt.,+oo OF Pedestrian Pathway Easement GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN 40o�"' (11yof w Tammy de W� r ; Mayor ti SEAL AHO 2r�ROfrho TREASU��� Attest by C.J Coles, City Cleric Approved By City Council On: 6 / --�2 Z ?0l7 STATE OF IDAHO ) SS. County of Ada ) On this �(D day of jj1h,0 , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and C.JAY COLES, known to me to be the Mayor and City Cleric, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. 0"G®P®4jB ® ®® (SEAL) ° ®� A k ° ° m ® woo ®_o Pedestrian Pathway Easement NOTARY PU�*IC FOR IDAHO � Residing at: Of Commission Expires: Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC IyTQOTf7` P: (208) 398-8104 r: (208) 398-8105 LGfI�.F%UNN%� LAG 2030 5. Washington Ave., Emmett, ID 83617 EXHIBIT A Linder 4 Plex ACHD Sidewalk Easement Legal March 2, 2017 BASIS OF BEARINGS for this description is South 0015'18" West, between the brass cap marking the northwest corner of Section 24 and the 5/8" rebar marking the W1/4 corner of Section 24, both in T. 3 N., R. 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land located in the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 24, T. 3 N., R. 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at a brass cap marking the northwest corner of said Section 24; Thence South 0015'18" West, coincident with the westerly line of said NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 24, a distance of 400.00 feet; Thence South 89059'42" East, 48.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing South 89059'42" East, 6.00 feet; Thence South 0015'18" West, parallel with said westerly line of the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 24, a distance of 182.79 feet; Thence North 53008'10" West, 7.47 feet; Thence North 01115'18" East, parallel with said westerly line of the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 24, a distance of 178.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence above described parcel contains 0.02 acres more or less. End Description NP'L LNO F V -Ns ��@P�� �9i Poi�i PA2016\16160-CMG LINDER 4-PLEX\Survey\Drawings\Descriptions\16160-ACHD SIDEWALK LEGAL,docx Image 11 b A o Zm` ADZ o � o S. I.INDER ROAD m BASIS OF BEARINGS N -� m� SO°15'18"W 400.00' N y Z c O_rn v �o m ti ��� 0.02 Act O o N ti �C, 0°15'18"E 178.31' \1 S 0°15'18" W 182.79' ccnoO rW�v c7 "<' �' � nC'1 r m V � b A TTb N C) r� Wox rZ7Z� PROFS m� pomp F o Cb z C) (,(4 - (SM -0 U00 y X �w�0 � Z y (A) o m Zj -1 0)Qj n o o � m � X Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7N PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: TM Crossing Navigator Sewer and Water Easement MEETING NOTES APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-056859 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 06/22/2017 08:09 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-058347 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 LISA BATT 06/27/2017 08:49 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this day of May, 2017, between Ten Mile Crossing Inc., an Idaho limited liability company, the party of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantor(s), and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the 'right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after malting repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 08/15/16 any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have Hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. G TOR: Ten Mile Crossing Inc. By: David W. Turnbull, President STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) AIA On this � I day of May, 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared David W. Turnbull, President of Ten Mile Crossing, Inc., the corporation that executed the within instrument and aclarowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. A A, AMA ANDA NO MARYPUBLI ORID Residing at:N7Commission ExpJires:S'�A�E IDAHO •.E' �— Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 08/15/16 QRANTEE; CITY OF MERIDIAN rhyOf �DAHO SEAL i aP� , Approved By City Council On; _ / W — STATE OF IDAHO, ss. County of Ada ) ` On this�i� day of 7&� , 20 f7, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles, loiown to me to be the Mayor and City Cleric, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the i same, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and { year first above written, oo®®nm®tie". e Yi SEAL ®�' f rel 1 p' NOTARY P LIC F R ID O +�, ®' ) t 0 Residing at; Commission Expires; �( Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 08/15116 LEGAL DES.CItTPTION >aOR NAVIbATOt _Sri lZt &WATER EASEMLNTA3..R6SS PHASE 2 Tile following describes nn easement located h► the Southwest 1/4 of Soodon 14, Tomiship 3 North, Mange I Wost, Boise Meridian, Ada Conti, Idaho, l3ehig Rulher descrlbed as follows; BASIS OF BEARINGS; The )Yesl line oftheSouth ivest 1/9 of Section 19, Tottinshlp 3Norih, Range. 1 Ayes(, Use,/ m --than, derived from found monuments and taken as,901r11, 00"30'/0" West with the distance between monnn;enk found to be 2659,45feel, BEGINNING at a point from wlilch file West 1/4 corner of Section 14, Township 3 Nooh, Range 1 West, Boise Merldlon bears North 03007'17" West a distance of 855,29 feet; thence South 8912725" Bast a distance of 33.63 foot; thence along a curve to the left with a radius of 169.00 fo9t and a contrat angle of 17"30'031' an arc length of S 1,62 fe8l with a chord bearhig ofNorilr 8147134" East, and a chord distatrco of 51,42 feet; thance Nortlr 73°02'32" East a distance of 99,93 feet; thance along a ourve to the right with a radius of231,00 feet and a central angle of 17°46'23" au are, length 01`71,66 feet with a ohord benrhrg of North 81°55'44" Bast, and a chord•distanca of 71,37 feet; thenco South 891,11'04" East a `distance of 389,55 feet; thence South 00°48'56" West a dis�ance of 62,00 feat; thence North 89111'04" West a distance of 389.55 feet; thence along a curve to tile, Ieftwlth a radius of 169,00 feet and a central angle of 1764623" an are length of 52,42 foot wlth a chord bearing of South 81 °55'45" WQSt, and n ohord distance of 52,21 feet; thence South 73102'32" West distance of 99,93 feet; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of23 1,00 feet and a central angle of 17030'03" an are longth of 70.56 feet with a chord bearing of South 81047134" West, and a chord distance of 70,28 foot; thotrce North 89027125" West a distance of 31,39 feet; thence North 01"31'40" West a distance of 62,04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Said Parcel containing 39,997 square feet or 0.92 acres, more or less and is srtbjeotto nil oxisting ensenretrts and rights -of -ways of rocord or implied, Kenneth H, Cook, PLS, 9895 Timberline Survoying 847 Park Centro Way, Saito 3 Nampa, Idaho 83651 (208) 465-5687 END OF DESCRIPTION >� n� � d; g _ N00°30'10" E - 2669.46' BASIS OF BEARINd © m--� �_,-- �=-""'�--- ...67,.008, �A.L1il0oCON _.. E. mv Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 70 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Professional Services Agreement With Jack H. Schonely for Police Officer Training in an Amount Not to Exceed $4,000 MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Scanned by CamScanner 20th Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner K. Exhibits. All exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference and made a part of hereof as if the exhibits were set forth in their entirety herein. L. City Council approval required. The validity of this Agreement shall be expressly conditioned upon City Council action approving the Agreement. Execution of this Agreement by the persons referenced below prior to such ratification or approval shall not be construed as proof of validity in the absence of Meridian City Council approval. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Effective Date first written above. TRAINER: -�✓% j N Jack H.Schonely OfficerTactics.com CITY OF MERIDIAN: GO�QORPTED q�CGiS 0 O W E jDlaN�. m �°SHO SE BY: lei' SEAL Tammy de W r ayor ��0 the rREns��`O Py Attest. C.1ay Cols City Clerk PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT SUSPECT TACTICS & PERIMETER CONTAINMENT TRAINING PAGES of 8 Scanned by CamScanner Exhibit A Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7P PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approval of Award of Bid and Agreement to SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION, CO. for the "LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $818,863.24. MEETING NOTES G✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Page 1 Memo To: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager CC: Brent Blake/PM Date: 06/12/2017 Re: June 20 th City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the June 20 th City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration. Approval of Award of Bid and Agreement to SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION, CO. for the “LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION” project for a Not- To-Exceed amount of $818,863.24. Recommended Council Action: Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement to SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION, CO. and authorization to Purchasing Manager to sign Purchase Order for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $818,863.24. Thank you for your consideration. City of Meridian Purchasing Dept. C E IDIANt-6�--v Public IL DA H O Works Department TO: Keith Watts FROM: Brent Blake DATE: May21, 2017 Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Memberse Keith Bird Joe Borton Lube Cavener Genesis Milam Anne Little Roberts Ty Palmer SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH TBD FOR THE LOCUST GROVE ROAD AND LAKE HAZEL ROAD WATERLINE EXTENSION PROJECT FOR A NOT -TO -EXCEED AMOUNT OF $890,000 I. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Brent Blake, Engineering Project Manager 489-1386 Kyle Radek, Assistant City Engineer 489-1343 Warren Stewart, City Engineer 489-0340 II. DESCRIPTION A. Back round In able to provide continued growth in South Meridian, the City water distribution system must expand. Key components of the distribution system are section line water mains. B. Proposed Project The proposed project is to construct a 12 -inch water main along Locust Grove Road from Mary Lane to E. Lake Hazel Road, and continuing eastward along E. Lake Hazel Road and connecting to the existing water main at the Eagle Road/Lake Hazel Road intersection. Fire hydrants will be installed at intervals along the length of the project. Additionally, water main stubs will be installed for the future City Park and Fire Station that are planned to be located south of E. Lake Hazel Road. Page 1 of 2 III. IMPACT A. Strategic Impact: Currently, the City of Meridian does not have any water mains in this area. This project will allow new water service to be available to customers and fire hydrant access along Locust Grove and Lake Hazel Roads. This project is in direct alignment with the Public Works mission to anticipate, plan and provide exemplary public services and facilities that support the needs of our growing community. B. Fiscal Impacts Project Costs: Fiscal Year 2017 Contract Amount Project Funding Available Fiscal Year 2017 IV. TIME CONSTRAINTS $890,000 Total Project Cost $890,000 Account Code / Codes 60-3490-96140 $890,000 Total Funding $890,000 Execution of this contract will allow the construction to be completed in the Fall of 2017. Departmental Approval: Warren Stewart Page 2 of 2 Da ie CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION PROJECT# 10640.C THIS CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION is made this 13th day of June, 2017, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of ldaho, hereinafter referred to as 'CITY', 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642, and Schmidt Construction Co.. lnc., hereinafter relerred to as "CONTRACTOR', whose business address is 15883 Robber Place, Cald il. tD 83607 and whose Public Works Contractor License # is PWC-16406. INTRODUCTION Whereas, the City has a need for services involving waterline construction; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform and has agreed to provide such services; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Scope of Work: 1.1 CONTRACTOR shall perform and furnish to the City upon execution of this Contract and receipt of the City's written notice to proceed, all services and work, and comply in all respects, as specified in the document titled "Scope of Work" a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, together with any amendments that may be agreed to in writing by the parties. 1.2 All documents, drawings and written work product prepared or produced by the Contractor under this Agreement, including without limitation electronic data files, are the property ot the Contractor; provided, however, the City shall have the right to reproduce, publish and use all such work, or any part thereof, in any minner and for any purposes whatsoever and to authorize others to do so. lf any such work is copyrightable, the Contractor may copyright the same, exceptthat, as to any work which is copyrighted by the contractor, the city reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use such work, or any part thereof, and to authorize others to do so' 1.3 The contractor shall provide services and work under this Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable federal, itate and city laws, ordinances, regulations and resolutions' The Contractor LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION PAgE 1 OT 14 Project 10640.C represents and warrants that it will perform its work in accordance with generally accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or proressions that are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of per{ormance of this Agreement. Except for that representation and any representations made or contained in any proposal submitted by the Contractor and any reports or opinions prepared or issued as part of the work performed by the Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor makes no other warranties, either express or implied, as part of this Agreement. 1 .4 Services and work provided by the Contractor at the City's request under this Agreement will be performed in a timely manner in accordance with a Schedule of Work, which the parties hereto shall agree to. The Schedule of Work may be revised from time to time upon mutual written consent of the parties. 2. Consideration 2.1 The Contractor shall be compensated on a Not-To-Exceed basis as provided in Exhibit B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof for the Not-To-Exceed amount oI $818,863.24. 2.2 The Contractor shall provide the City with a monthly statement and supporting invoices, as the work warrants, of fees earned and costs incurred for services provided during the billing period, which the City will pay within 30 days of receipt of a correct invoice and approval bytheCity. The Citywill notwithhold any Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax from any payment made by City to Contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Payment of all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of Contractor. 2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor shall not be entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration, compensation, salary, wages, or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, transportation, drawings, renderings or mockups. Specifically, Contractor shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement to consideralion in the form of overtime, health insurance benefits, retirement benefits, paid holidays or other paid leaves ol absence of any type or kind whatsoever. 3. Term: 3.1 This agreement shall become etlective upon execution by both parties, and shall expire upon (a) completion ol the agreed upon work, (b) or unless sooner terminated as provided in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and Section 4 below or unless some other method or time ol termination is listed in Exhibit A' g.2 Should contractor delault in the perlormance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to Contractor' LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION PAgE 2 Of ,14 Projecl 10640.C 3.3 Should City fail to pay Contractor all or any part of the compensation set forth in Exhibit B of this Agreement on the date due, Contractor, at the Contractor's option, may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not remedied by the City within thirty (30) days lrom the date payment is due. 4, Liquidated Damages: Substantial Completion shall be accomplished within 150 (one hundred f itty) calendar days from Notice to Proceed. This project shall be considered Substantially Complete when the Owner has full and unrestricted use and benefit of the facilities, both lrom an operational and safety standpoint, and only minor incidental work, corrections or repairs remain for the physical completion of the total contract. Contractor shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty. Upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall have 180 (one hundred eighty) calendar days to complete the work as described herein. Contractor shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty. See Milestones listed in the Payment Schedule for Substantial Completion. 5. Termination: 5.1 lf , through any cause, CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to CONTRACTOR of such termination and specitying the elfective date thereof at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination. CONTRACTOR may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least sixty (60) days notice to CITY. ln the event o, any termination of this Agreement, all finished or unfinished documents, data, and reports prepared by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall, at the option ol the CITY, become its property, and CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily complete hereunder. 5.2 Notwithstanding the above, ooNTRACTOR shall not be relieved of liability to the clTY for damages sustained by the clTY by virtue ol any breach of this LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION PAgE 3 Of 14 Project 10640.C Agreement by CONTRACTOR, and the CITY may withhold any payments to CONTRACTOR tor the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the Clry from CONTRACTOR is determined. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve CONTRACTOR of its liability to the CITY for damages. 6. lndependentContractor: 6.1 ln all matters pertaining to this agreement, CONTRACTOR shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither CONTRACTOR nor any officer, employee or agent ol CONTRACTOR will be deemed an employee of CITY. Except as expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City and therelore has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the City. The selection and designation of the personnel of the CITY in the perrormance of this agreement shall be made by the CITY. 6.2 Contraclor, its agents, officers, and employees are and at alltimes during the term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent contractors and not as employees of the City. 6.3 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. lf in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction and supervision and control of the Contractor. 7. Sub-Contractors: Contractor shall require that all of its sub-contractors be licensed per State of ldaho Statute # 54-1901 8. Removal of Unsatisfactory Employees: The Contractor shall only furnish employees who are competent and skilled lor work under this contract. lf, in the opinion of the City, an employee of the Contractor is incompetent or disorderly, refuses to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract, threatens or uses abusive language while on City property, or is otherwise unsatisfactory, that employee shall be removed from all work under this contract. 9, lndemnification and lnsurance: 9.1 CONTRACTOR shall indemnily and save and hold harmless CITY and it's elected officials, otficers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and for any and LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE ETTENSION PAgC 4 Of 14 Project 10640.C all losses, claims, actions, judgments ,or damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses and other costs including litigation costs and attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the CONTRACTOR, its servants, agents, officers, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of CITY or its employees.N T R h lm rn S ecificall at it will h term of IS reemen liabil insurance, in which th e CITY shall be named an additional ins ured in the minimum amounts as follow:General Liability One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) per incident or occurrence, Automobile Liability lnsurance One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) per incident or occurrence and Workers' Compensation lnsurance, in the statutory limits as required by law.. The limits ol insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY; and if CITY becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein provided, CONTRACTOR covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of, resulting from , or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Contractor or Contractor's officers, employs, agents, representatives or subcontractors and resulting in or attributable to personal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible or intangible property, including use of. CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY with a Certificate of lnsurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing CONTRACTOR'S compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of insurance with the CITY at least ten (10) days prior to the date Contractor begins performance of it's obligations under this Agreement. ln the event the insurance minimums are changed, CONTRACTOR shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits. Evidence ol all insurance shall be submitted to the City Purchasing Agent with a copy to Meridian City Accounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642. 9.2 lnsurance is to be placed with an ldaho admitted insurer with a Best's rating of no less than A-. 9.3 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be declared in writing and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce oi eliminate such deductibles, self-insured retentions or named insureds; or the Contractor shall provide a bond, cash or letter of credit guaranteeing payment of losses and related invesligations, claim administration and defense expenses. g,4 To the extent of the indemnity in this contracl, contractor,s lnsurance ior"r"g. stit ne primary insurance regarding th-e city's elected officers, officials, "lnpf oyl"s anO volunteeis. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City "ii[" 6itvt .r"cted off icers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be excess ol the Contiactor's insurance and Shall not contribute with Contractor's insurance except as to the extent of City's negligence' LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION Project '10640.C page 5 ot 14 9.5 The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 9.6 AII insurance coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein. 9.7 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 10. Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof , and that the lailure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. 11. Bonds: Payment and Performance Bonds are required on all Public Works lmprovement Projects per the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC, which by this reference are made a part hereof. Contractor is required to turnish faithlul performance and payment bonds in the amount of 100% of the contract price issued by surety licensed to do business in the State of ldaho. ln the event that the contract is subsequently terminated for failure to perform, the contractor and/or surety will be liable and assessed for any and all costs for the re-procurement of the contract services. 12. Warranty: All construction and equipment provided under this agreement shall be warranted tor 2 years f rom the date of the City ot Meridian acceptance per the ISPWC and the Meridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC and any moditications, which by this reference are made a part hereof ' All items found to be defective during a warranty inspection and subsequently corrected will require an additional two (2) year warranty from the date of City's acceptance of the corrected work. 13. LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION Proiect 10640.C Changes: The CITY may, from time to time, requesl changes in lhe Scope of Work.to be oerformed heieunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the 'amount of CONTRACTOR'S compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the clTY and CoNTRACTOR, shall be incorporated in written amendments which shall be executed with the same lormalities as this Agreement. page 6 ot 14 14. Taxes: The City of Meridian is exempt from Federal and State taxes and will execute the required exemption certificates for items purchased and used by the City. ltems purchased by the City and used by a contractor are subject to Use Tax. All other taxes are the responsibility of the Contractor and are to be included in the Contractor's Bid pricing. 15. MeridianStormwaterSpecifications: All construction projects require either a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or an erosion sediment control plan (ESCP) as specified in the City of Meridian Construction Stormwater Management Program (CSWMP) manual. The CSWMP manual containing the procedures and guidelines can be found at this address: http://www.meridiancity.orq/environmental.aspx?id=1 361 8. Contractor shall retain all stormwater and erosion control documentation generated on site during conslruction including the SWPPP manual, field inspections and amendments. Prior to rinal acceptance of the job by the City the contractor shall return the field SWPPP manual and field inspection documents to the City for review. A completed Contractor Request to File Project N.O.T. with the EPA form shall be provided to the City with the documents. These documents shall be retained, reviewed and approved by the City prior to f inal acceptance of the project. 16. ACHD: Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with the City to obtain appropriate ACHD permit(s) and will reimburse the City for fees, tines, or penalties City incurs due to Contractor's violation of any ACHD policy. City shall certify to ACHD that Contractor is authorized to obtain a Temporary Highway and Right-of-Way Use Permit from ACHD on City's behalf. The parties acknowledge and agree that the scope of the agency granted by such certification is limited to, and conterminous with, the term and scope of this Agreement. 17. Reports and lnlormationr 17.1 At such times and in such lorms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. 17.2 Contractor shall maintain all writings, documents and records prepared or compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement-for a minimum of lour'(4) years from the termination or completion of this or Agreement. This includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static, photographic andevery other means ol recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols or any combination thereof. LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION Project 10640.C page 7 o'f 14 18. Audits and lnspections: At any time during normal business hours and as otten as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of CONTRACTOR'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall permit the CITY to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. 19. Publication, Reproduction and Use ol Material: No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CITY shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement. 20. Equal Employment Opportunity: ln performing the work herein, Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of Title Vl and Vll of the Civil Rights Act, Revenue Sharing Act Title 31 , U.S. Code Section 2176. Specifically, the Contractor agrees nol to discriminate against any employee or applicant tor employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. Contractor will take atfirmative action during employment or training to insure that employees are treated without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political afliliation, marital status, or handicap. ln performing the Work required herein, CONTRACTOR shall not unlavvfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis ol race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 21. Employment of Bona Fide ldaho Residents: Contractor must comply with ldaho State Statute 44-1002 which states that the Contractor employ ninetyjive percent (95%) bona fide ldaho residents. 22, Advice of Attorney: Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement. lt has received independent legal advice from its attorney's or the opportunity to seek such advice. 23.Attorney Fees: should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreemeni, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as miy be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys'fees as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate page 8 of 14LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION Proiect 10640.C contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 24. ConstructionandSeverability: lf any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenJorceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. 25. Waiver of Default: Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided above. 26. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral ol written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. 27. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that CONTRACTOR shall not have the right to assign, trans1er, hypothecate or sell any of its rights under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. 28. Payment Request: Payment requests shall be submitted to City of Meridian through the City's project management software. The Project Manager will compare the invoice against the Payment Schedule in the Agreement tor compliance. Upon approval that the work has been done and is in compliance with the Agreement, the Project Manager will approve the pay request for processing. City of Meridian payment terms are Net 30 from the date City receives a correct invoice. Final payment will not be released until the City has received a tax release from the Tax Commission. 29 LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION Project '10640.C Cleanup: contractor shall keep the worksite clean and free from debris. At completion of work and prior to requesting final inspection, the contractor shall remove all traces of waste materials and debris resulting lrom the work. Final payment will not be made if cleanup has not been pertormed. page 9 of 14 30. Order of Precedence: The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement, the Invitation for Bid document, then the winning bidders submitted bid document. 31. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of work required hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. 32. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. 33. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY CONTRACTOR City of Meridian SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Purchasing Manager Attn: William Schmidt 33 E Broadway Ave 15883 Robber Place Meridian, ID 83642 Caldwell, ID 83607 208-489-0417 Phone: 208-459-2461 Email: sam@schmidtconstruction.biz Idaho Public Works License #PWC -C-16406 Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. 34. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of Meridian. CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: TAMMY de W , MAYOR Dated: LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION Project 10640.0 SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. BY: if ; ;1 fir► ver: WILLIAM SCHMIDT, PRESIDENT Dated: page 10 of 14 Approved by Council: C / ;"v- / X 17 Attest: /A�2� CJ COLES, ITY &tERK PurchasingApproval BY: KEITHWAITS, Purchasihng Manager Dated:: (�o /ez/ 7 Project Manager Brent Blake 0 tpTEDA ,FgkFGC,�s i s o �-�►'� E� hy of IDIAN�. � IDAHp SEAL Department Approyal WAAREN STEWART, City Engineer Dated:: nA/ I LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION page 11 of 14 Project 10640.0 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK REFER TO INVITATION TO BID PW.1734.10640.C ALL ADDENDUMS, ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the lnvitation to Bid Package # PW-l734-10640.C, are by this reference made a part hereof. SPECIFICATIONS / SCOPE OF WORK All construction work shall be done in accordance with the current version of the ldaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC), the 2013 City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC (and any Addendums). See separate attached documents: PLANS - Locust Grove & Lake Hazel Waterline Extension by Civil Survey Consultants, lnc. dated October 2016 (10 pages) SPECIAL PROVISIONS by Civil Survey Consultants, lnc. dated 12-2-2016 (18 pages) LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION Prolect 10640.C page 12 of '14 Exhibit B MILESTONE / PAYMENTSCHEDULE Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed $818,863.24. LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION Proiect 10640.C Substantial Completion 150 Days from Notice to ProceedMilestone 1 180 Days from Notice to ProceedMilestone 2 Final Completion Contract includes furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals as required for the LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION per IFB PW-1734-10540.C NOT TO EXCEED CONTRACT TOTAL.$818S6p1 Contract is a not to exceed amount. Line ltem pricing below wlll be used for invoice veritication and any addltional increases or decreases In work requested by city. The City will pay the contractot based on actual quantities ol each item ol work in accordancs with the contract documents. Quantity Unit Unil PriceItem No.Description 1,603 SY S10.60Type C Surface Restoration307.4.1.E.1. 2,180 SY s26.s0307.4.1.G.1.a.Type "P" Surface Restoration - Locust Grove Road 3,793 SY S3s.93Type "P" Surface Restoration - Lake Hazel Road307.4.1.G.1.b. 553 SY 537.72Type "P" Surface Restoration - Temporary307.4.1.G.1.c. '199 LF s30s.00Pipe Boring and Jacking308.4.1.A.1. LF S2s.so846" PVC, AWWA CgOO, DR18 Water Main401.4.1.A.1.a. LF S41.848,39312'PVC, AWWA CgOO, DR18 Water Main401 .4.1.A.1.b. s1,123.007EA6" Gate Valve402.4.1.4.1 .a. s2,230.001712" Gate Valve402.4.1.A.1.b. s2,700.007EAFire Hyd rant Assembly403.4.1.A.1. s4,700.001EAStaging Area1001 .4.2.A.1 . s9s0.002EAStabilized Construction Entrance1001 .4.2.B.1 s3.83849LF1003.4.1.G.1. s20,87s.001LSTraffic Control'I 103.4.1.A.1. page 13 of '14 A. MILESTONE DATES/SCHEDULE PRICING SCHEDULE Contract Pricing Schedule EA Straw Wattle 20 t 0.4.1 .A.1 .Mobilization 1 LS s38,97s.00 SP-1 24'4,3/8" Thick Steel Water Main Casing 241 LF s13s.00 SP-2 Leak Detection Metering Station Per Meridian SD-W14 2 EA s1,8s0.00 SP.3 Automatic Air Release Valve 1 EA s1,ss0 sP-4 2" Blow-off Assembly Per Meridian SD- w12 Z EA S1,8Eo.oo LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION Project 10640.C page 14 of 14 CONTRACT CHECKLIST Date: REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Project Name: Project Manager: Contract Amount: Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Is this a change order? Yes No Change Order No. Fund: Budget Available ( Purchasing attach report ): Department Yes No Construction GL Account FY Budget: Task Order Project Number: Enhancement: Yes No Professional Service Equipment Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No Grant Grant #: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status (Federal Funded) Print and Attach the determination Print, attach and amend bid by addendum (if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach Master Agreement Category (Bid Results Attached) Yes No (Ratings Attached) Yes No Date MSA Roster Approved: Typical Award Yes No If no please state circumstances and conclusion: Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends: PW License Expiration Date: Corporation Status Insurance Certificates Received (Date): Expiration Date: Rating: A+ Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): Rating: A+ Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes No (Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000) Reason Consultant Selected 1 Performance on past projects Check all that apply Quality of work On Budget On Time Accuracy of Construction Est 2 Qualified Personnel 3 Availability of personnel 4 Local of personnel Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation: Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: By: Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final N/A N/A N/A N/A Goodstanding 16406 6/30/2018 I. PROJECT INFORMATION 6/8/2017 1/1/2018 FY17 4/17/2017 Public Works Locust Grove Road and Lake Hazel Rd Waterline Extension V. BASIS OF AWARD 6/1/2017 June 8, 2017 IV. GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded projects VI. CONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION June 12, 2017 VIII. AWARD INFORMATION Approval Date Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved Warren Stewart 6/9/2017 VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete) 6/8/2017 Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected $818,863 Brent Blake If yes, has policy been purchased? Construction Contractor - Schmidt Construction/Consultant - Civil Survey Consultants III. Contract Type II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) 60 3490 96140 10640.c TASK ORDER RFP / RFQ BID BID RESULTS Si g n e d Bi d B o n d Li c # Su b s X X X X X X X X X X X X Attest: Barb Nielsen DUE DATE & TIME: MAY 22, 2017 2:30 BID NUMBER: PW-1734-10640.C BID NAME: LOCUST GROVE & LAKE HAZEL WATERLINE EXTENSION $858,466.05 BID AMOUNT $914,211.00 $818,863.24 Opened by: Karen Wooddell VENDOR Blue Sky Construction Knife River Schmidt Construction City Of }lalj.diatt Detailed Stateis<t of Revenues and Expenditures - Rew algtxp Report 3{90 - tlater Conatruction Projecta 60 - Eate4)riae tund Ftam IA / | /2015'thtonqhl 9 /3A /2A1 7 Budget with Cui.rent Year Actual Budge t Remarning Kei th Percent of Buclget Remaining L!r29 Nor!h Penngrowe liay - Water Main Connectlon Total Capital OuElay 0.00 20, 150 . 00 (20,150.00)0.003 2 328 429.52 483 19.24\ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2 829 -52 1,845,444.95 19 -242 Dat:e:4/t9/t1 0 4:43: t 3 PU 483,388.57 ACORijP CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 6ilc52017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION OI.ILY ANO CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR EGATIVELY AMEND, EXTENO OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED AY THE POUCIES AELOW THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CO TRACT BETWEE THE ISSUI G INSURER(S). AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOI.DER. IMPORTANT: ll the cerlillcate holder is an ADDITIO AL INSURED, Ote pollcy(l6s) must ha\re ADDITIONAL IIISURED provlsions or be sdorsed. l, SUBROOATION lS WAIVED, sublGct to the tcrrns and conditions ol the policy, c6rtaln policic6 may rcquire an endorsement. A statcment on this certiticat€ doss not conier rlofrs to th6 c€rlitlcal€ holder in li€u ol start elldors€rtronlas). FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY HOME OFFICE: P.O. BOX 328 CMVATONNA, MN 55Od) CL ENT CONTACT CENTER {a/c. tlo. Eri}: 8a&3:}3-494S {a/c. tro):507-44H681 i-lHLs' cTTEITcoTTACTCENTERAFEDINS.coM INSURER(S) AFFORDII{C COVERAGE I SURER A: FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 13935 IIiISIJRED SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 15883 ROBBER PL cALDf/ELt- tD 8:)607-5025 3U-113-? COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:29 REVISION NUMBER:o THIS lS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURAI{CE LISTEO BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMEO ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOO INDICATED NOTWITHSTANOING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFOROED BY THE POLICIES OESCR]BED HEREIN IS SUEJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS ANO CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES, LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUC€D BY PAID CLAIMS, LIMITS x COMMERCIAI GENERA! LIAB LITY 5I3; E.* x N 9151227 o1toIt2017 01/41n018 $1,000,000 PREMISES lE.6.drEnel $100,000 MED ExP (Ary on. p.6dl EXCLUDED PERSOTIAL & ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GENERAL AG6RE6ATE $2,000,000 PRODUCTS . COMP/OP ACG $2,000,000 AUTOMOAILE LIABIfITY x SCHEOULEO N N 9151227 01to1/2017 01/01/2018 MBINEO SINCLE I.IMIT $1,000.000 BoDTLY r JURY (Per p.B6) aODILY INJURY (P.r..cideno x EXCESS ftAA x N N 915T 229 01t01t2017 01t01t2018 $10,0m,000 $10,000,000 OED RETENTION WORKERS COMPEI{SATIOI{ AT{D EMPIOYERS' LIABILITY Al{Y PROPRIEIOR/PARTNER/EXEcUTI'et OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? DESCRIPIION OF OPERAIIONS b.toe N 9151228 41tolt2017 01ta1n01B x OTH- $500,000 E L. OISEASE. EA EMPI.OYEE $500,000 E,L DISEASE. POLICY UMIT $s00,000 DESCRIPTIONOFOPERATIOI{S/LOCAIlo|lS/\TEHICLES(ACORDr01,AddilimtR.n.rfcS.t.t/tB,n.yb..tbdEr,ilhoE!r@i.[qui6d) SEE ATTACI{ED PAGE CERTIFICATE HOI.DER CANCELI-ATION 384-1197 CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E BROADWAY AVE STE 210 MERtDtAN, tD 83A{2-2619 SHOUI.D ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POUCIES BE CANCELIED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WLL BE DEUVERED IN ACCORDATICE WTH THE POUCY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENIATIVE @ 1988-201 5 ACORD CORpORAT|ON. AI rigt(s reserved. ACORD 25 (2016 8)The ACORD mme ahd togo arc regist.red rrlarks o( ACORD N r FEDERATED MUTUAL NSU RANCE COMPANY NAII'ED INSIJRED SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 15843 ROBBER PL CALDr''ELL, ID 83607-5025SEE CERTIFICATE # 29.0 SEE CERTIFICATE # 29.0 EFfEC'IVE DAIE; SEE CERTIF CATE # 29.0 AGENCY CUSToMER lD: 384-113-7 LOC #: ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Pase -L ot -L @ 2qE ACORD CORPORATTON. A rigt s reserved. The ACORD narn. and logo ara registared marks of ACORD ADDITIONAL REMARKS THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDUE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ____2L FOnM TlTtr CERT FICATE OF LIABIL ry INSURANCE PRoJECT: LOCUST GRoVE & LA(E HAZEL I{ATERLTNE EXTEI{SIOII SURA}EE PROVIDED BY THE GE ERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE IS PRI}IARY A},ID NO}EOIITRTBUTORY OVER OTHER INSURAT{CE. GEI{ERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE COIIAIIIS CG 25 03 DESIGI{ATM C(llsTNUCTIot{ GEHERAL AEGREGATE LIIIIT ENIX'RSEI'IENI APPLICABLE TO EACH CONSTRUCTION PROJECT AS REQUIRED BY I{RITTEI{ COiTTRACT OR WRITTEN AGREEI{E}'IT. THE CERTTFICATE HOLDER IS AN ADDITI$IAL II{SI'RED SUBJECT TO THE CO}IDITISIS OF THE ADDITIC{AL II.ISUREO - OXNERS, LESSEES OR C(I{TRACTORS. AUTO{ATIC STATUS IIHEII REQJIRM IN C$lsTRIrcTIOI AGREEHEIIT XITH Yq'R ET{DORSE}IENT FOR GENERAL LIABILITY. ACORD 101 (2q,8m1) ,qcilo" WAIA Document A312^ - 2010 Pertormance Bond I Bond Number: 6044893 CONTRACTOR: (Name, legal slalus and address) SURETY: (Ndme, legal slatus and principal place of business) Federated Mutual Insurance Company PO Box 328 Owatonna, MN 55060 Schmidt Construction Co Inc 15883 Robber Place Caldwell ID 83607-5025 ADDITIONS At.ID DELETIONS: The author of this document has added information needed for its completion. The author may also have revised the text of the original AIA slandard form. An Additions and Deleliors Report that notes added information as well as revisions to the standard form texl is available f.om the aulhor and should be reviewed. A verlical line in lhe left margin of this documenl indicales where the author has added necessary informalion and where the author has added to or deleled from the originalAlA text. OWNER: (Name, legal stqtus and address) City of Meridian, Purchasing Department 33 E Broadway Ave, Suite 106 Meridian, ID 83642 Bid No.: PW-1734-10640.C CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Date: June 13, 2017 Amount: $ 818,863.24 (Eight Hundred Eighteen Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty-Three and 24l100-. Dollars) Description: (Name dnd location) Job Name: Locust Grove & Lake Hazel Waterline Extension, Meridian, ldaho Work Includes: waterlines, valves/fittings, fire hydrants, trench work, trucking, traffic control, paving, (Traffic Control, and paving by subcontractors) BOND Date: (Not earlier than Construction Contracl Dqte) June 13,2017 Amount: $ 818,863.24 (Eight Hundred Eighteen Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty-Three and 24l100- Do Modifications to this Bond: Ilars None See Section l6 CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPALCompany: (Corporate Seal) This document has important legal consequences. Consultation with an attomey is encouraqed with respect 10 its complelion or modificalion. Any singular reference to Cmkactor, Surety, Owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable. SURETY Company: hrr* ru.", Name and Title: (Corporate 0 Signature: Name and Title: willi Schmidt,tsa sh President Fact (Any additional signatures appear on lhe last page ofthis Performance Bond) (FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Name, address and telephone) AGENT oT BROKER: OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: (Atchitect, Engineer or other party:) AIA Document A312 -2010 Perfomancs Bond. The American lnstilule ofArchitects. Allrights r€servect. WARNINGiThis AlAa Docum bv U.S. copyright Law and lnternationalTreaties. Unauthorizecl reproduction or distribution ofthis AlAc Documeni, orany porrioD of severe civiland cnminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the marimum extent possibte underthe law. This documentw;s produced at 14:17:12 on 0610512917 under Order No.0844510437-t which expircs on O9/OB/20.r7, and is not for resate. lnit, (1097805881) 1 xY x $ 1 The Contractor and Surety. iointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the Owner for the performance ofthe Construction Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference. S 2 lf the Contractor performs the Construction Contract, the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond, except when applicable to participate in a conference as provided in Section 3. $ 3lfthere is after .1 .2 .3 no Owner Default under the Construction Contracl, the Surety's obligation under this Bond shall arise the Owner first provides notice to the Contractor and the Surety that the Owner is considering declaring a Contractor Default. Such notice shall indicate rvhether the Owner is requesting a conference among the Owner, Contractor and Surety to discuss the Contractor's performance. Iffie Owner does not request a conference, the Surety may, within five (5) business days after receipt of the Owner's notice, request such a conference. lfthe Surety timely requests a conference, the Owner shall attend. Unless the Owner agrees otherwise, any conference requested under this Section 3.1 shall be held within ten (10) business days ofthe Surety's receipt ofthc Owner's notice. Ifthe Owner, the Contractor and the Surety agree, the Contractor shall be allowed a reasonable time to perform the Constuction Contract, but such an agreement shall not waive the Owner's right, ifany, subsequently to declare a Contractor Default; the Owner declares a Contractor Default. terminates the Construction Contract and notifies the Surety; and the O\,'Ter has a$eed to pay the Balance ofthe Contract Price in accordance with the terms ofthe Construction Contract to the Surety or to a contractor selccted to p€rform the Construction Contract. $ 5 When the Owner has satisfied the conditions ofSection 3, the Suretyshall promptly and at the Surety's expense take one ofthe following actions: $ 5.1 Arange forthe Contractor, with the consent ofthe Owner, to perform and complete the Construction Contractl S 5.2 Undertake to perform and complete the Construction Contract itsell', through its agents or independent contractors; $ 5,3 Obtain bids or negotiated proposals iiom qualified contractors acceptable to the Owner for a contract for performance and completion ofthe Construction Contracl, arrange for a contract to be prepared lbr execution by the Owner and a contractor selected with the Owner's aoncurrence, to be secured with performance and payment bonds executed by a qualified surety equivalent to the bonds issued on the Construction Contract, and pay to the Owner the amount ofdamages as described in Section 7 in excess ofthe Balance ofthe Contract Price incurred by the Owner as a result ofthe Contraator Default: or $ 5.4 Waive its right to perform and complete, arrange for completion, or obtain a new contractor and with reasonable promptness under the circumstances: .l Affer investigation, determine the amount for which it may be liable to the Owner and, as soon as practicable after the amount is determined, make payment to the Owner; or.2 Deny liability in whole or in part and notiry the Owner, citing the reasons for denial. S 6lfthe Surety does not proceed as provided in Section 5 with reasonable promptness, the Surety shall be deemed to be in default on this Bond seven days after receipt ofan additional written notice from the Owner to the Surety demanding that the Surety perform its obligations under this Bond, and the Orvner shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the owner. Iflhe Surety proceeds as provided in Section 5.4, and the owner refuses the payment or the Surety has denied liability. in whole or in part, without further notice lhe Owner shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner. AIA Document A3i2t - 2010 Pefonn.nce Bond. Tho Ameican lnstilute of Architecls. Alt rlghtr reserved. WARNING:This alAr Documenl is p.otectecl by U.S Copynght Law and lnternalional T.eaties. Unaulho.ized rcproductio. or distribstion of th|s ara Oo.ument or.ny portion of ir, may .e3uti i. serere civil and craminal perrarli€s, and wi,l be prosecuted lo lhe maximum en€nt possibre u.der tne iaw. This document was produced by AtA sofiware al 13:25:34 on 06105/2017 under Ordd No.0844510437_1 which 6xpires on 09/08/2017, and is not for resele. Uier Not*: (1211707958) lnit. $ 4 Failure on the part ofthe Owner to comply with the notice requirement in Section 3.1 shall not constitute a failure to comply with a condition precedent to the Surety's obligations, or release the Surety from its obligations, except to the extent the Surety demonstrates actual prejudice. 3 S 7 Ifthe Surety elects to act ulder Section 5.1, 5.2 or 5.3, then the responsibilities ofthe Surety to the Owner shall not be greater than those ofthe Contractor under the Construction Contract, and the responsibilities ofthe Owner to the Surety shall not be greater than those ofthe Owner under the Construction Contract. Subject to the commitment by the Owner to pay the Balance ofthe Contract Price, the Surety is obligated, without duplication, for .l the responsibilities ofthe Contractor for correction ofdefective work and completion ofthe Construction Contract; .2 additional legal, design professional and delay costs resulting ilom the Contractor's Default. and resulting fi'om the actions or failure to act ofthe Surety under Section 5; and .3 liquidated damages, or ifno liquidated damages are specified in the Construction Contract, actual damages caused by delayed performance or non-performance ofthe Contractor. S 8 If the Surety elects ro act under Section 5.1, 5.3 or 5.4, the Surety's liability is limited to the amount ofthis Bond. $ 9 The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner or others for obligations ofthe Contractor that are unrelated to the Consruction Contract, and the Balance ofthe Contract Price shall not be reduced or set offon account ofany such unrelated obligations. No right ofaction shall accrue on this Bond to any person or entity other than the Owner or its heirs, executors, adminisaators, successors and assigns. $ '10 The Surety hereby waives notice ofany change. including changes of time, to the Construction Contract or to related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations. $ 1l Any proceeding, legal or equitable, under th is Bond m ay be instituted in any court of competent jurisdiction in the location in which the work or part ofthe work is located and shall be instituted within two years after a declaration of Contractor Default or within two years afler the Contractor ceased working or within two years after the Surety refuses or fails to perform its obligations under this Bond, whichever occurs first. Ifthe provisions ofthis Paragraph are void or plohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties as a defense in the jurisdiction ofthe suit shall be applicable. $ 12 Notice to the Surety, the Owner or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the page on which their signature appears. ! 13 When this Bond has been fumished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location where the construction was to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said statutory or legal requirement shall be deemed deleted heretom and provisions conforming to such statutory or other legal requirement shall be deemed incorporated herein. When so furnished, the intent is that this Bond shall be construed as a statutory bond and not as a common law bond. S 14 Definition8 S 14.1 Balance of the Conlract Price. The total amount payable by the Owner to the Contractor under the aonstruction Contract afler all proper adjustments have been made, including allowance to the Contractor ofaoy amounts received or to be received by the Ou,ner in settlement ofinsurance or other claims for damages to which the Conractor is entitled, reduced by all valid and proper payrnents made to or on behalfofthe Contractor under the Construction Contract. S 14.2 Construclion Contract. The agreement between the Owner and Contractor identified on the cover page, including all Contract Documents and changes made to the agreement and the Contract Documents. s 14.3 contractor Default. Failure ofthe contractor, which has not been remedied or waived, to perform or otherwise to comply with a material term ofthe Construction Contract S 14.4 Owner Default Failure ofthe Owner, which has not been remedied or waived, to pay the Contractor as iequired under the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or comply with the other material terms oflhe Construction Contract. s ,14.5 contract Documents. All the documents that comprise the agreement between the owner and contractor. AIA Document A312 - 2010 Pertormance Bond. The Am by U S Copyright Law and lntorontional Treaa,.s Unauth ericanlnstituteofArchitects.Allright!ttservod.wARNING:ThisAIA'Doclrmentisprotecled uction o. dist buti;n of th3 AIA' Bocument. or any po(ion of it, mav r€su Itr 4 s;vere civil and criminalpenalties, a.d will b€ prosecuted d t3:25:34 on O6lO5t2O17 unde. Order No 0844510437-1wh um oxteflt possible utrder $e law This docum€nl was produced by AIA soflw ln it. ich expir6s on 09/08/2017, and is nol lor resale (1211707956) S '15 Ifthis Bond is issued for an agreement betueen a Contractor and subcontractor, the term Contractor in this Bond shall be deemed lo be Subcontractor and the tenn Owner shall be deemed to be Contractor. $ 16 Modifications to this bond are as follows: (Space is provided beloi, for additional signalures ofqdded pqrties, olher thqn those appearing ox the cover page.) CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SUREWCompany: (Corporate Seal) Company: (Corporate Seal) Signature: Name and Title: Address: Signature: Nanre and Title: Address: ING: This AIA? Document is prorecled ment. or any portion of ir, m;y result in document was produc6d by AIA sofrware {1211707958) lnit.AIA Doclment 4312 - 2010 Porfomance Bond. The American tnstitde of Architecis. AI right 6sorved. WARNby U.S copyrighr Law and rnternarioDat Treatics. Un:urhorized reprortLrctioo or dist.buti;s of this AIA-. oocu severe civil anii cirn nal porlsllres. and wiI be prosec!ted to the ,nn)drnum exle.t possibte under the taw Thisat 13:25:34 on OOlO5l2O17 u6der Order No.08445j0437_1 which expircs on 09/08/2017, snd is not for resate. 5 'W.AIA Document A312^ - 2010 Payment Bond Schmidt Construction Co Inc 15883 Robber Place Caldwell ID 83607-5025 ADDITIO}{S ANO 0ELETIONST The author of this document has added informalion needed for ils complelion. The author may also hale revised the texl of the original AIA standard form. An,4dditions and Delelions Report lhat noles added information as well as revisions lo the standard form lext is available from the author and shorJld be reviewed. A vertical line in the left margin of lhis document indicates where the author has added necessary information and where the aulhor has added to or deleted from the originalAlA texl. I Bond Number: 60.14893 CONTRACTOR: (tr'dnc, legal slat s dnd address) SURETY: (Name, legal galus and principal place of business) Federated Mutual Insurance Company PO Box 328 Owatonna, MN 55060 SURETY Company OWNER: (N-amc, legal sl.tlus arul adtlress.l City of Meridian, Purchasing Depanment 33 E Broadway Ave, Suite 106 Meridian, ID 83642 Bid No.: PW- 1734- 10640.C CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Date: June 13,2017 Amount: $ 818,863.24 (Eight Hundred Eighteen Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty-Three and 24l100- Dollars) Description: (Name and location) Job Name: Locust Grove & Lake Hazel waterline Extension, Meridian, Idaho Work includes: waterlines, valves/fittings, fire hydrants, trench work, trucking. trarfic control, paving, (Trallic Control, and paving by subcontractors). This document has important legal consequences. Consullalion with an attorney is encouraged wilh respect to ils complelion or modillcation. Any singular reference lo Conlractor, Surety, Owner or olhea pa.ty shall be considered plural where applicable. CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPALConrpany: (Corporute Seul) Signature: Name and Title: ((.orporate lgnature: illiam Sc midt.Nanre and SA af, President Title Arr -Fact (Any addilional signatures qppear on llp last puge of this Payment Bond.) (lOR INFORM+I'ION ONLY Name. address ancl telephone) AGENT oT BROKER: OWNER,S REPRESENTATIVE: (Archilect, Engineer or other part!:) AIA Document A312n - 2010 p.yment Bond. The Ame.ican ln3utute of Archilecls. All.tgh U.S. copy,ight Law and internationir Trealros Unaulhonzed reprocluclion or distribuio s6rere civil and crimrnat penattres, ard vril be prosecuted to the m.rimum exien! possi al 14115 43 on 06/05/2017 undo. Order No.0A44510437_t which sxpires on O9/0Bl2O.|7, end i b r€aerved. WARNING: This AtA: Docum€nt is prot€cted by n otthis AIA locument, or a.y portaon of it. may resul in ble uaderthe law. This documenl w66 producsd byAtA soflware ln it. \1785279047) I BOND Date: (Nol eqrlier than Conslruction Contract Date) June 13,2017 Amount: S 818,863.24 (Eight Hundred Eighteen Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty-Three and 24l100- Dollars) Modifications to this Bond: I X--l None f_l See Section 18 AIA Oocument A312fl - 2010 P u S copyright Law and lnte.na severe civiland crnninal ptnalt al 14:15:43 on 06/05/20'17 under .vment Bond. TheAmerican Insttule ol Archilecls al ti;nal Trcat.s Jnaulhoflzed'el'odu't'o^'-dr<lI !cs. drro {rll n. D'osPcJlt d lo t" m r rirr ur' t rl'nl Order No 0844510437-1 which €xptres on 09/08/2017 irFott ,"serr.C. WlnXtNG: Thrs AIA Docume^t s protected by t,,i"nottr,'sarr' OocLrment oranv portio' of n mav res''ll'r ;;ssible under tha law. This docum6ntwas producsd bvAiA soRwa'e . end is notfor resal€. (7A527gO47,) lnit.2 5 1 The Contractor and Surety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the Owner to pay for labor, materials and equipment furnished for use in the performance ofthe Construction Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to the following terms. $ 2lfthe Contractor promptly makes payment ofall sums due to Claimants, and defends, indemnifies and holds harmless the Owner from claims, demands, Iiens or suits by any person or entity seeking payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance ofthe Construction Contract, then the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond. $ 3 Ifthere is no Owner Default under the Construction Contract, the Surety's obligation to the Owner under this Bond shall arise afler the Owner has promptly notified the Contractor and the Surety (at the address described in Section I 3 ) of claim s, demands, liens or suits against the Ou,ner or the Owner's property by any person or entity seeking payment for labor, matedals or equipment fumished for use in the performance ofthe Construction Contract and tendered defense ofsuch claims. demands, liens or suits to the Contractor and the Surety. 5 4 When the Owner has satisfied the conditions in Section 3, the Surety shall promptly and at thc Surety's expense defend, indemnil! and hold harmless the Owner against a duly tendered claim, demand. lien or suit. $ 5 The Surety's obligations to a Claimant under this Bond shall ariseafterthe following: $ 5.1 Claimants, who do not have a direct contract with the Conractor, ,l have furnished a written notice ofnon-pa),rnent to the Contractor, stating with substantial accuracy the amount claimed and the name ofthe party to whom the materials were, or equipment was, firmished or supplied or for whom the labor was done or performed, within ninety (90) days after having last performed labor or last fumished materials or equipmenr included in the Claim; and .2 have sent a Claim to the Surety (at the address described in Section I 3). $ 5,2 Claimants, who are employed by or have a direct contract with the Contractor, have sent a Claim to the Surety (at the address described in Section l3). $ 6 If a notice of non-payment required by Section 5. I . I is given by the Owner to the Contractor, that is sufiicient to satisfu a Claimant's obligation to furn ish a written notice of non-payment under Section 5. I . l $ 7.1 Send an answer to the Claimant, with a copy to the Owner, within sixty (60) days afler recaipt ofthe Claim, stating the amounts that a.re undisputed and the basis for challenging any amounts that are disputed; and $ 7.3 The Surety's failure to discharge its obligations under Section 7.1 or Section 7.2 shall not b€ deemed to constitute a waiver ofdefenses the Surety or Contractor may have or acquire as to a Claim, except as to undisputed amounts for which the Surety and Claimant have reached agreement. lf, however, the Surety fails to discharge its obligations under Section 7.1 or Section 7.2, the Surety shall indemni! the Claimant for the reasonable attomey's fees the Claimant incurs thereafter to recover any sums found to be due and owing to the Claimant. $ 8 The Surety's total obligation shall not exceed the amount of th is Bond, plus th e amount of reasonable attom ey's Iees provided under Section 7.3, and the amount ofthis Bond shall be credited for any payments made in good faith by the Surety. $ 9 Amounts owed by the Owner to the Contractor under the Construction Contract shall be used for the performance ofthe Construction Contract and to satisfy claims, ifany, under any construction performance bond. By the Contractor furnishing and the O*,ner accepting this Bond, they agree that all funds earned by the Contractor in the performance ofthe Construction Contract are dedicated to satisry obligations ofthe Contractor and Suretv under this Bond, subject to the Owner's priority to use the funds for the completion ofthe work. lnit.AIA Documont A3'12 - ml0 Peymont Aond. ThsAmencen tnslrtute of Architects. Altridhr. U S Cop,,rglrt t"w dnrl nter-dtro.dt Irerir.s. L/naJthori.cd retrodur Lo. n, rr,en,lutr-o,, scvere civrl and c.irni.at pe,tatties, aird wi be prosec!ted to tire marim!m etlent possrbl at13:2344 on 6lO3t2O17 under Order No OO4it510437_1 which expir.B on 09/0S/2017, and is r reseryed. WARNiNG: This A,A" Docnmenr is protocted byoftbis AIA'' Ooc.lnent, oriny po,lion of it, may.esutr in € Lrnder tne law. This document was produc6d byAtA soiware 114A2780213) 1 $ 7 When a Clairnant has satisfied the conditions of Sections 5.1 or 5.2, whichever is applicable, the Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's expense take the following actions: ! 7.2 Pay or arrange for payment ofany undisputed amounts. ! l0 The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner, Claimants or others for obligations ofthe Contractor thal are inrelated to thi Construction Contract. The Owner shall not be liable for the payment ofany costs or expenses of any Claimant under this Bond, and shall have under this Bond no obligation to make pa),rnents to, or give notice on behalfof, Claimants or otherwise have any obligations to Claimants under this Bond' $ 1l The Surety hereby waives notice ofany change, including changes oftime, to the Construction Contract or to related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations. $ 12 No suit or action shall be commenced by a Claimant under this Bond other than in a court ofcompetent j-urisdiction in the state in which the project that is the subject ofthe Construction Contract is located or a{ier the ixpiration ofone year from the date ( I ) on which the Claimant senl a Claim to the Surety pursuant to Section 5.l-2 or 5.2, or (2) on which the last labor or service was performed by anyone or the last materials or equipment were fumished by anyone under the Construction Contract, whichever of(l) or (2) first occurs. Ifthe provisions ofthis Paragraph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties as a defense in the jurisdiction ofthe suit shall be applicable. $ 13 Notice and Claims to the Surety, the O*1]er or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the page on which their signature appears. Actual receipt ofnotice or Claims, however accomplished, shall be su{frcient compliance as ofthe date received. S 14 When this Bond has been fumished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement inthe location where the consruction was to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said statutory or legal requirement shall be deemed deleted herefiom and provisions conforming to such statutory or other legal requirement shall be deemed incorporated herein. When so fumished, the intent is that this Bond shall be construed as a statutory bond and not as a common law bond. $ 15 Upon request by any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneficiary ofthis Bond, the Contractor and Owner shall promptly fumish a copy of this Bond or shall permit a copy to be made S 16 Definitions S 16.1 Claim. A written statement by the Claimant including at a minimum: .1 the name of the Claimant: .2 the name ofthe person for whom the labor was done, or materials or equipment fumishedi .3 a copy ofthe agreement or puchase order pursuant to which labor, materials or equipment was fumished for use in the performance ofthe Construction Contract; .4 a briefdescription ofthe labor, materials or equipment fumished; .5 the dale on which the Claimant last performed labor or last fumished materials or equipment for use in the performance ofthe Conshuction Contracti .6 the total amount eamed by the Claimant for labor, materials or equipment fumished as ofthe date of the Claim; .7 the total amount ofprevious payments received by the Claimant; and .8 the total amount due and unpaid to the Claimant for labor, materials or equipment fumished as ofthe date of the CIaim. S 16.2 Claimant An individual or entity having a direct contract with the ConAactor or with a subcontractor ofthe aontrdctor to firmish labor, materials or equipment for use in the performance ofthe Construation Conftaat. The term Claimant also includes any individual or entity that has rightfully asserted a claim under an applicable mechanic's lien or similar statute against the real property upon which the Project is located. The intent ofthis Bond shall be to include without limitation in the terms "labor, materials or equipment" that part of \Yater, gas, power, light, heat, oil, gasoline, telephone service or rental equipment used in the Construotion Contract, architeatural and en-gineering services required for performance ofthe work ofthe Contractor and the Contractor's subcontractors, ani all othir items for which a mechanic's lien may be asserted in thejurisdiction where the labor, materials or equipment were fumished. s,t6.3consttuc.tioncontract.Theagreementbetweentheownerandcontractoridentifiedonthecoverpage, including all Contract Documents and all changes made to the agreement and the Contract Documents. alA Document A312 - 2010 PaYmInlt. U S Coptlqht taw,rnd ttrtcrnarion severe civil aird criminal penaltios, ent Bond. The Amei.an lnstrlute ofArchitecls. Allrig al Treaties. lJnauthorized reproducticn or distributioh ofthis AlA" Document. o. anv portion of it, may resuli !1 at 13:23:/K on 05/05/2017 under order No.0844510437 and will be pr*ecutod to the maximum enent possib le u.der the law This documenlwas produced by AIA soffware -1 which exprres on 09/08,2017, and is \'148278A213J 4 $ 15.4 Owner Default. Faiiure ofthe Owner, which has not been remedied or waived, to pay the Contractor as required under the Construction Contraat or to perform and complete or comply with the other material terms ofthe Construction Contract. S 16.5 Contract Documents. All the documcnts that comprise the agreement between the Owner and Contractor S 17 lfthis Bond is issued for an agreement between a Contractor and subcontractor, the term Contractor in this Bond shall be deemed to be Subcontractor and the term Owner shall be deemed to be Contractor. S '18 Modilications to this bond are as follows: (Space is provided below /ot qdditional signatures of added parties, olher than lhose qppearing on lhe coyer Wge.) CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETYCompany: (Coryorate Seol) Company: (Corporate Seal) Signaturel Name and Title: Address: AIA Document A3'12* - 2010 Peyment Bond. TheAmedcan tnstiiule ofArchilects. Afl rtghts re3erved. WARUS Copyrighi L.w:nd lntornational Tre.ties Una!thorizcd rcproduclton ordist.tbution ofthis AIA Oo s.vere crv il ard criftrnar penaltres. and wilt be prosec!ied to the ma!i,num axt€nt possrble rinder the taw, al 13:23:44 on OBlOSl20l7 under Order No.084451043 7_1 which expires on O9/OB/2017, and is not for resate. NING: This AlAi Doc{ment is prolected by cument. or any portion of it, may resuh ln , This documenl was produc€d by AIA sofrwero lnit. l'14e27802 13) 5 Signature: Name and Title: Address: POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and having its principal office in the City of Owatonna, State of Minnesota. does hereby constitute and appoint: LISA ROUSHAR of the ciry of OWATONNA State I\4INNESOTAo1 its true and lawful attomey for the following purposes: To sign its name as sur€ty to, and to execute, affix the seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all surety bonds and penalties not exceeding: NINE HUNDRED THOUSAND OOLLARS ($9OO,OOO) EACH SCHMIDT CONSTRUCTION CO INC CALDWELL, ID The execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents slrall be binding upon the Company as ifthey had been cxecuted and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers ofthe Company. This Porver of Aftorney granted by Federated Mutual Insurance Company shall terminate when the designee ceases to be: l) Employed by Federated Mutual lnsurance Company or 2)Employed by Federated Mutual Insurance Company in a job for which such Power of Attomey is required. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this instrument to bc signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its Executive Vice President and Assistant Secretarv this the 8TH day of APRIL 2016 FEDERA'I'ED MUTUAL IN SURANCE COMPANY (sEAr.)ecuti e Vice resident and BY sistant Secretarv STA.TE OF MINN ESO'fA cor-tN]-Y or s'I'EFli-E gn 16;5 &tll da, o1 APRIT 2016 personally appeared before me, the undersigieC nolary public, James A. Thon and Jonathan R. Hansoa to me personally known, who, each being duly sworn by me, did say that they are respectively the Executive Vi ce President and Assistant Secretarv ofthe FEDERATED IvfllTI,Al INSURANCE COMPANY and that the seal affixed to this instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation and that this instrument was signed and sealed of behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Drectrjrs and said James A. Thon and colporatiorl @ XELLY J. HAGEN lloTABY PUEUC . I NES0IA It CottIl|btlu lplot .ho. 31,2020(SEAL) Jonathan R. Hanson acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said BY COPY O!' RESOLUTION *BE IT RESOLVED that the President or any Vice President in conjunction with the Secretary is hereby authorized and empowered under tlre corporate seal of the Company, to appoint any person or persons as attomey or afiorneys-in-fact, or agent or agents ofthe Company, in its name and as its act to execute and deliver, anyrvhere in the United States or Canada, any and all bonds and undertakings of suretyship and other documents that the ordinary course of surety business may require." *BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Power of Attorney or other document appointing such person or persons as attorney or attomeys-in-fact or agent or agents of the Cornpany may either be personally signed by the President, any Vice President, the Secretary or may be executed by said officers by means of facsimile signatures. The said personal signatures or facsimile signatur€s shall not require the Cornpany seal or any other seal and shall be valid and binding on the company if executed either by personal signature or facsimile signature and with or without the Company seal being affixed thereto." I, the undersigned, hereby certi! that I am a Executive Vice President of the FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and that the foregoing is a true and complete copy ofthe oliginal Power of Attorney given by said Company to: of OWATONNA. MINNESOTA authorizing and empowering such person to sign bonds as therein set forth, which Power of Attomey has never been revoked and is still in full for ce and effect. I further certifo that said Power of Attomey was given in pursuance of a resolution adopted at a regular meeting ofthe Board ofDirectors ofsaid Company duly called and held at the office ofthe Company in the City of Owatonna, Minnesota on the 20'r'day ofApril, l9 82 at whieh meeting a quorum was present and that the foregoing is a tru€ and correct copy of said reso lution, and the whole thereof as recorded in the minutes of the said meeting. PURSUANT to the By-Laws of Federated Mutual Insurance Company, Afticle 8, Section l; in the absence ofor inability ofthe Secretary to act, his duties shall be perlormed by the Assistant Secretaries in the order oftheir rank. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY this the 1 3TH day of JUNE 2017 FEDERATED IV{UTUAL ]NSURANCL, COMPT'NY (lEAL) A, / /?j/\) E utive Vice President LISA ROUSHAR Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7Q PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approval of Task Order 10044.E to Brown and Caldwell for the "WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION - SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION" project for a Not -To - Exceed amount of $870,050.00 MEETING NOTES c✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Page 1 Memo To: C.J Coles, City Clerk, From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager CC: Emily Skoro Date: 6/8/2017 Re: June 20 th City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the June 20 th City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration. Approval of Task Order 10044.L to Brown and Caldwell for the “WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION – SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $870,050.00.00. Recommended Council Action: Award of Task Order 10044.L to Brown and Caldwell for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $870,050.00 Thank you for your consideration. City of Meridian Purchasing Dept. CONTRACT CHECKLIST Date: REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Project Name: Project Manager: Contract Amount: Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Is this a change order? Yes No Change Order No. Fund: Budget Available ( Purchasing attach report ): Department Yes No Construction GL Account FY Budget: Task Order Project Number: Enhancement: Yes No Professional Service Equipment Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No Grant Grant #: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status (Federal Funded) Print and Attach the determination Print, attach and amend bid by addendum (if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach Master Agreement Category (Bid Results Attached) Yes No (Ratings Attached) Yes No Date MSA Roster Approved: Typical Award Yes No If no please state circumstances and conclusion: Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends: PW License Expiration Date: Corporation Status Insurance Certificates Received (Date): Expiration Date: Rating: Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): Rating: N/A Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes No (Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000) Reason Consultant Selected 1 Performance on past projects Check all that apply Quality of work On Budget On Time Accuracy of Construction Est 2 Qualified Personnel 3 Availability of personnel 4 Local of personnel Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation: Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: By: Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final $870,050 Emily Skoro If yes, has policy been purchased? Brown & Caldwell III. Contract Type II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) 60 3590 96164 10044.L TASK ORDER 2a RFP / RFQ BID VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete) The scope of the work was examined by Engineering and Operations personnel. The total contract cost percentage over the combined project construction and equipment procurement cost is approcimately 7% which is typical and widely accepted engineering services during construction percentage. Normal SDC percentages can range from 3% - 8%. N/A Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected VIII. AWARD INFORMATION Approval Date Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved Warren Stewart 10/11/2016 June 8, 2017 N/A I. PROJECT INFORMATION 5/11/2016 5/31/2017 N/A FY17 10/6/2016 Public Works WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION - SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION V. BASIS OF AWARD IV. GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded projects VI. CONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION 10/1/2014 N/A N/A N/A N/A Goodstanding N/A N/A TASK ORDER NO. 1OO44.L Pursuant to the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER) AND (ENGINEER) WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION - SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION The Project will involve improvements related to the following WRRF processes: . New lnlluent Pump Station (lPS) facility including submersible pumps with self- cleaning wet well fealures. . New IPS electrical building for power supply and controls to the lps.. New Headworks lacility including influent screening and grit removal, solids load-out room, and primary in{luent flow splitting slructures. . New yard piping conveyance from existing Headworks location to new IPS location.. New yard piping conveyance from the new IPS to the new Headworks as follows: o New raw sewage torce mains. o New primary influent sewer from the Headworks facility to existing clarifier nos. 3 and 4 splitter box. o New primary influent sewers to clarifier nos. 5 and 6 (coordination with the Liquid Stream Capacity Expansion project). o New primary sludge and scum pipelines trom the Primary Sludge Pump Station (coordination with the Liguid Stream Capacity Expansion pro.iect) to the Fermenter and Digester iacilities, respectively.. New discharge force main and flow metering for the existing plant drain pump station. . Demolilion of the existing Headworks facility (screens / channels / screw pumps / grit iacilities). Task Order 10044.L WWRF Hsadworks Capacity Expansion Services Dudng Construc{on page 1 ot 10Brown & Caldwell This Task Order is made this 13th day of June 2017 and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws ol the State of ldaho, hereinafter referred to as "City", and accepted by Brown & Caldwell. . hereinafter referred to as "Engineer" pursuant to the mutual promises, covenant and conditions contained in the Master Agreement (category 2a) between the above mentioned parties dated October 1, 2014. The Project Name for lhis Task Order is as follows: SCOPE OF WORK Overall assumptions for performance of the Phase B scope ot work are summarized below:. Scope Basis. This scope ol work is based on components ol lhe WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion Contract Documents (January 2017), and conesponding Addendum 1 through 2 published during the advertisement and General Contractor bidding period. . Project Schedule. The Phase B work on this project is projected to last 18 months from authorization to proceed and is targeted to be complete by October 2018. However, many factors that could impact schedule are not in control ot the Engineer. Project and estimated construclion schedules will be developed in Microsoft Project by the General Contractor. . Construction ManagerResponsibilities. - The Construction Manager role is not included in this scope of work, but is covered by the City. - The City will oversee and inspect day-to-day construction activities, and will provrde all administration of the construction contracts, including reviewing pay requests. - The City will provide tor all special inspections [under a separate contract with Materials Testing and lnspection (MTl)l required by the lnternational Building Code (lBC), as well as all materials testing. - The City will provide site surveying, benchmark control and elevation verification (under a separate contract with Civil Survey). - The City will provide programming services (under a separate contract with cH2M). - To maximize the use ol the City's budget, incomplete or unclear submittals or FlFl's may be returned without review or commenl. All submittal communication will take place on the City's electronic CONDOC service.. Engineer Activities On-Site. The Engineer is responsible solely for Engineer's employees' activities on the proiect site. Engineer's participation on the proiect shall not be construed to relieve the City or any construction contractors lrom their responsibilities tor maintaining a safe jobsite. Neither the professional activities of the Engineer, nor the presence of the Engineer's employees and sub-Engineers, shall be construed to imply the Engineer has any responsibility tor means and methods ol work performance, superintendence, sequencing o, construction, or safety in, on, or about the jobsite. Task Descriptions Specilic tasks to be performed by Engineer and City to implement the phase B scope of work are summarized in the work breakdown below and described in lurther delail on the following pages. Task Ord€r 10044.L WWRF Heads/orks Capacity Expension SBrvicas Ouring Consruction Eror'rn & Caldwell Page 2 ol l0 Wort Ereakdorvn Structure a a 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 Contormed conltrucdon oocumants Submln ls Changrs/ R Fls Slte Coodinadon/ PmEr6s6 Mseti.ts fleld lnspectlons R.cord olarlngs 0&M Manu.l{Jpdate Stan'Up Suppod SeMcos ftdecl Managem€nl 400 Series Tasks: Services During Construction The 400 Series tasks will focus on services during construction. Task 400 - Contormed Constructlon Documents Objective: To incorporate Addendum Changes into the plans and specilications and republish a single updated version of the Contract Documents for construction phase use. Activities/Approach: Addendum 1 through 2 changes to the plans and speci{ications will be incorporated into a Conlormed Construction Document deliverable. The construction parties (General Contractor, City and Engineer) will refer to the conformed set for all conslruction activity lor the duration of the prolect for consistency purposes. Task Order Total is based on the following: . 10 sets of Conformed Construction Documenls (specifications and 24"x36" full size drawings) will be submitted to the City. . 1 0 sets ol Conlormed Construclion Documents (drawings only - 1 1 "x17" half size drawings) will be submitted to the City. . An electronic formal (..pdl) ol the complete set will also be submitted to the City. Task 410 - Submltlals Objective: To review all submittals. Activities/Approach: Submittals will be reviewed for general conlormance with the proiect design concept and general compliance with the inrormation or design requirements given in the Contract Documents. The Engineer will perform these services within the duration alloned by the construction contract. Should any submittal be found to be substantially def icient, Engineer may reject lhe submittal without markups, while giving written examples ol major deficiencies as cause for re.lection. Written responses, in the form oi written comments and/or marked-up submittals, will be transmitted to the City via a submittal transmittal/comment torm and supplemented by mark-ups of hard copy submittal documenls where required for clarity. Submittals shall be turned around within the time frame specified in the project specilications. Submittals shall be processed through CONDOC, the Cily's document management tool. Task Ordor 10044.1WWRF HBadworks Capacity Expanston SeMces Ouring Consln ction Erown & Cald'lY€ll Pag6 3 ol 10 Task Order Total is based on the following: . Engineer has allocated an average or 7.0 hours per submission to review, document comments, and return submittals. This hour per submission estimate is based on the City facilitating verbal discussions with the reviewing €ngineer as appropriate to minimize re-submittals. . lt is assumed there could be up to 374 submittal review events (this includes a 1.5 resubmittal rate per submittal). . Number of submittals and hours is an estimate and may not reflect actual number ot submittals or time required {or submittal review. Submittal metrics will be reviewed monthly and included in the monthly progress report Task 420 - Changes/RFls (Work Change Diroctives) Objective: To review RFI's as requested by the City. Activities/Approach: RFI's submitted by the Contractor shall not include calculations and other submittal items (i.e. pipe support calculations, which are considered a shop drawing submittal) or design changes. Task Order Total is based on the following:. Engineer has allocated an average ol 6 hours per FlFl for office staff to prepare responses. This hour per RFI estimale is based on the City lacilitating verbal discussions with the reviewing engineer as appropriate lo minimize the erfort spent on RFI preparation. . lt is assumed there will be 150 RFI's based on number of sheets.. Number of RFI's and hours is an estimate and may not reflect actual number ol RFI's or time required lor RFI review. RFI metrics will be reviewed monthly and included in the monthly progress report Task 430 - Slto Coordlnatlon/Progross lleetlngs Objective: Participate in pre-construction conlerences and bi-weekly construction meetings. When possible, additional key Engineer or sub-Engineer participation in construction meetings will be via telephone. ActivitietApproach: Selected Design Team members will participate in pre-construction conlerences and periodic construction meetings.. Attendance at pre-construction conference with up to 4 Engineer staff (Engineer - 2 staft; CTA sub-Engineer - 1 staff; DC Engineering sub-Engineer - 1 stal{).. Participation in bi-weekly construction meetings: For budgeting purposes, it rs assumed that the ,ollowing meetings will be anended: - Engineer Pro.iect Manager and Discipline Coordination Lead al each bi-weekly meeting. - One additional key Engineer stalf at 1 meeting per month - One additional sub-Engineer statf (CTA or DCE) at I meeting per month A total of 8 hours is assumed for each meeting per attendee (including agenda preparation and input, pre-meeting status updates with the City, meeting with the City Task Order 10044.LWWRF Headwofis Capacity ExpEnsion Sowicss OurinO Corstnrction Brown & Caldwell Page 4 of 10 and Contractor, post-meeting with the City, construction site coordination visits, and meeling minute preparation). . Number of Site Coordination/Progress Meetings and hours is an estimate and may not rellect actual number of meetings or time required for this Task. Site Coordination/Progress Meeting metrics will be reviewed monthly and included in the monthly progress report. Task 440 - Field lnspectlons Obiective: To provide support to the City in reviewing test results and providing lield inspection services. ActivitieyApproach: Review work perf ormed by others, including testing, inspection, and survey services. Perform site visits to observe construclion work, performance, and witness testing as requested by the City. Structural Observalions per the IBC are included in this scope. Slructural Observation as performed by the Slructural Engineer is ditferent from "Special lnspection", which is not included in this scope. Task Order Total is based on the following: . Fess have been included lor Engineer structural observation effort. This etfort includes up to l6 observations lo inspect foundations prior to concrete placement; bearing walls prior to cover-up wilh non-structural elemenls; concrete masonry construction prior to grouting; and laleral lorce resisling element construction. To the extent possible, all site visits will be coordinated with construction meetings and with concurrent structural observation al multiple facilities to minimize budget impacts.. Fees have been included lor CTA (architectural/building mechanical) etfort. This effort includes up to 12 site visits to inspect the new buildings at diflerent phases of construction (e.9., insulation, finishes, flashing, siding, roofing, HVAC, plumbing, fire proteclion, punch-lisl ilems, etc.). To the extent possible, all sile visits will be coordinated with construction meetings to minimize budget impacts.. Fees have been included lor DC Engineering (electrical) effort. This effort includes up to 20 site visits to inspect the new buildings and process equipment at dilferent phases of construction (e.9., power supply coordination, translormers, wiring, panels, arc rlash study, punch-list items, etc.). To the extent possible, all site visils will be coordinated with construction meetings to minimize budget impacts. Work Products: Review comments on tesl resulls and notes lrom site and off-site visits. Task 450 - Record Drawings Objective: Produce linal CAD drawings o, proiect tacilities as constructed from mark-ups and drawings submitted to the City from the Conlraclor in conformance with the provisions of Specification 01 78 39. Acrvities/Approach: working lrom contractor submifials (red-line drawings or potentially pdf.liles or CAD mark-up drawings), and City direction where available, produce final project drawings of the as-constructed work. Engineer engineers will work with the city to interpret drawing inconsislencies or discrepancies, perform f ield investigation where needed, and then will direct cAD stafl on correct representation of work. Final Record Task Order 100,{4.1WWRF Headxork! Capacity E&ansion Servic6 During Constructrdr Erown I Caldvrell Pago 5 ol 10 Drawings will be produced in AutoCAD Release 2014 or later and will be provided to the City in electronic lormat lor reproduction. Assumplions: Contractor mark-ups are complete and accurale and Enginogr's work under this subtask is only to convert the Contractor-supplied record drawing malerials into linal drawings, and not to independently validate or correct record drawings. Work Products: Final drawings liles lrom AuloCAD Release 2014 or later, and provided in electronic format (..dwg and -.pdf), submitted to the City. Task 460 - O&U Manual Update Objective: Update the Existing operations and mainlenance (O&M) manual tor the City ol Meridian WRRF in accordance with IDAPA 58.01 .16. The manual will only be for the new or updated facilities included in this proiect. The major facilities include: . New lnfluent Pump Station (lPS) lacility including submersible pumps with self- cleaning wet well features. . New IPS eloctrical building lor power supply and controls to the lPS. . New Headworks facility including influent screening and grit removal, solids load-out room, and primary inlluent flow splitting structures. . New yard piping conveyance from existing Headworks location to new IPS location. . New yard piping conveyance from the new IPS to the new Headworks as follows: o New raw sewage torce mains. o New primary influent sewer from the Headworks facility to existing clarifier nos. 3 and 4 splitter box. o New primary influent sewers to clarifier nos. 5 and 6 (coordination with the Liquid Stream Capacity Expansion project). o New primary sludge and scum pipelines from the Primary Sludge Pump Station (coordination with the Liquid Stream Capacity Expansion project) to the Fermenter and Digester facilities, respectively. . New discharge force main and flow metering for the existing plant drain pump station. . Expansion of the facility control system to incorporate new process areas Activilies/Approach: lncorporate vendor submittals and operations and maintenance manuals into the existing electronic operations and maintenance manual using the lollowing steps:. Meet with Operations and Maintenance Staff.. Conduct f ield investigation lo verify on-site lacilities.. Collect data and information. . Modify the table oI conlents. . Write text for upgrades to Treatment Plant. . Prepare graphics for updated manual. . Produce photographs lor updated lull manual.. Submit text, graphics, and photographs. . Produce final draft manual for City and then ldaho Department of Environmental Oualily (IDEQ) review. Task Ord6r 10044.1WWRF Headworks CEpadry Erpansion Sorvices During Con3truction pags 6 ot 10 Srown & Caldwell . Produce final manual. Work Products . Outline oJ the O&M Manual for City review. . lncorporating City comments. . Preliminary draft manual for City review. . Preliminary drail manual, incorporating City comments . Draft O&M manual for City and IDEQ review. . Final O&M manual. O&M manual products listed above will be presented in electronic format as -.pdf files. Task 470 - Slart.Up Support Servlces Objective: To assist the City with planning and implementation of start-up, testing, and commissioning activities. This Task is divided into areas: start-up planning and startup. Start-Up Plannlng Activities/Approach: Participate in start-up planning aclivities by helping develop the Start- up strategy wilh the City and the Contractor. Participate as a member ot the start-up team, to be led by the City and the Contractofs Start-Up Manager (Quality Assurance Manageo. Participate in the review of the Contractor's written start-up plan submitted under Section 01 75 00. Perform technical analyses of treatment plant issues as requested by the City in planning and coordinating start-up aclivities. Coordinate schedule and start-up event timing with City. Assumplions: . Four start-up planning meetings with the City are anticipaled prior lo startup.. Meetings include 8 hours lor each meeting, preparation and follow-up. Two Engineer team members will attend each meeting. . ArrangemenUconducting ot meetings and meeting notes are provided by Engineer in collaboration with City and Contractor. . Additional time is included lor internal start-up discussions, technical review of Contractor submitted startup plan, and preparation for City/Contractor meetings identified above. Work Products: Provide review comments on dratt and final text lor start-up plan document. Start-Up Activilies/Approach: The Engineer will provide engineering services during the start-up phase. Assumptions: . This task addresses participation of otfice stall in start-up and commissioning activities. . The City and the Contractor shall conduct all testing and commissioning and shall provide test and commissioning dala to the Engineer in electronic format. Engineer shall review the data, meet with City staff or witness testing activities, and provide wntten feed-back in the form of a technical memorandum where appropriate.. Engineer facility leads will be present in lield for set periods of time during testing and commissioning of their respeclive areas of design as requested by the City. Task Order 100,1,t.L WWRF Hoadworks Capacity Expansion Seryic€s Dudng Construction Brown I Cauwell Pago 7 ol 10 . Commissioning will be completed during a nominal 1-month period and require multiple staff and discipline involvement. Work Products: Field notes and memoranda identifying corrective actions for problems or deliciencies noted during testing and commissioning Task 480 - Prolect Management Objective: To provide management, direction, coordination, and control of all work associated with Project schedule, budget, sub-Engineers, technical quality, and monthly progress reports and invoicss for the Proiect. ActivitieyApproach: This task includes the tollowing activities: . Develop a Health and Safety plan lor internal use.. Prepare monthly project status reporls. Progress reports will identily budget status, progress status, activities of the previous month, and up-coming activities.. Supervise project staff. . Manage in-house budget and schedule. . Procure, supervise, and coordinate the activities ol sub-Engineers providing specialized or supplemental engineering services. Work Products: . Monthly progress reports and invoices . Sub-Engineercontracts FUNDING Funding for this proiect will be split between three fiscal yearc, 2017 (May 2017 - Sept. 2017) $294,339.00, 2018 (Oct.2017 - Sept.2018) estimated al $531,426.00 and 2019 Oct. 2018) estimated at $44,285.00. The amounts estimated beyond the 2017 fiscal year have not yet been appropriated by the City. Contractor may NOT expend more than the amount specified and approved lor a specilic fiscal year. Any and all additional expenditures beyond the current liscal year MUST be approved by City Council and memorralized by a written amendment or change order to this Agreement. TIME OF COMPLETION and COMPENS ATION SCHEDULE Task Order 10044.1 WWRF Headvrorks Capacity Epanlion Sorvices DurirE CorEtrwtion Bro,vn & Cal(hvell Pag6I ot 10 The estimated expenses are included in the amounts below and are based on the following: ArchitecturayBuilding Mechanical - Sub-Engineer: CTA Group - $80,140 Electrical - Sub-Engineer: DC Engineering - $60,00 Site Coordination/Progress Meetings; Field lnspections; Slart-Up Support Services (29 trips) - Airrare: one person @ $350 per round trip ticket The Not -To -Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order is eight hundred seventy thousand fifty dollars ($870,050.00). No compensation will be paid over the Not -to -Exceed amount without prior written approval by the City in the form of a Change Order. Any and all travel will only be reimbursed if pre -approved by the Project Manager, and only per the City of Meridian Travel Policy. Reimbursable expenses will be paid at cost and only if pre -approved by the Project Manager. Any travel and/or reimbursables paid will be paid as part of the Not -To -Exceed Task Order Total per the Compensation and Completion Schedule above. CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: ` TAMMY de W , MAYOR R N & CALDWELL BY: Dave Bergdolt Dated: . / / X7 Approved by Council:_ u` / '�O / ))/7 Dated: Q�PSED AU OGUST Attest: Q o 2 City of CJ CO S, C CLERK �E IDiA4 o Ar IDAHO SEAL aP41 �2T��erthe TREPSJ�� Purchasing Approval Department Approval Task Order 10044.E WWRF Headworks Capacity Expansion Services During Construction Brown & Caldwell Page 9 of 10 COMPENSATION AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE Task Description Due Date Compensation 400 Conformed Construction Documents October 2018 $15,310 410 Submittals October 2018 $305,650 420 Chan es/RFIs October 2018 $131,678 430 Site Coordination/Progress Meetings October 2018 $131,562 440 Field Inspections October 2018 $69,628 450 Record Drawings October 2018 $48,866 460 O&M Manual Update October 2018 $50,912 470 Start -Up Support Services October 2018 $60,708 480 Project Management October 2018 $55,736 TASK ORDER TOTAL: $870,050.00 The Not -To -Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order is eight hundred seventy thousand fifty dollars ($870,050.00). No compensation will be paid over the Not -to -Exceed amount without prior written approval by the City in the form of a Change Order. Any and all travel will only be reimbursed if pre -approved by the Project Manager, and only per the City of Meridian Travel Policy. Reimbursable expenses will be paid at cost and only if pre -approved by the Project Manager. Any travel and/or reimbursables paid will be paid as part of the Not -To -Exceed Task Order Total per the Compensation and Completion Schedule above. CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: ` TAMMY de W , MAYOR R N & CALDWELL BY: Dave Bergdolt Dated: . / / X7 Approved by Council:_ u` / '�O / ))/7 Dated: Q�PSED AU OGUST Attest: Q o 2 City of CJ CO S, C CLERK �E IDiA4 o Ar IDAHO SEAL aP41 �2T��erthe TREPSJ�� Purchasing Approval Department Approval Task Order 10044.E WWRF Headworks Capacity Expansion Services During Construction Brown & Caldwell Page 9 of 10 BY KE ATTS, Purch ng Manager Dated 6 BY Dated: , Engineering Manager City Project Manager Troy Thrall Task Order 10044.1WWBF Headworks Capacily Expansion Services During Construction&own & Calclw€ll Pag€ l0 o,10 ACORD' ES+ CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE {i/IM/DDIYYYY) 5/18/2011 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUEO AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTENO OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZEO REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: ll the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSUREO, the policy(i*) must have ADDITIONAL ltlsuRED provisions or be endorsed lf SUBRoGATIoN lS wAlvED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsemenl. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certilicate holder in licu ot such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Lockton Comoanies 444 W. 47th Srreet. Suite 900 Ka n sas C itv N40 641 1 2- 1 906 (816) 960.E000 N L A: Hartford Fire Insurance t96 )INSUREO BROWN ANO CALDWELL l05l2l2 AND ITS WHoLLY OWNED SUBS|D|ARIES AND AFFILIATES 201 NORTH CIVIC DRIVE, SUITE 115 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 lllsuRER B : Harlford Accident and IndemniO' Company 22357 rNsuRER c: Lloyds ofLondon tlsunen o: Tuin Cir,'" Fire Insurance Companv 29,159 IISIRER E l INSURER F i 5/l L/2018 TIFICATE N xx D BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOO INDICATED NOTWTHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERT.I OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUEJECT TO ALL THE TERMS EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. Lll\,llTS SHOWN t\,lAY HAVE BEEN REOUCED By pAtD CLAt[4S THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTE ryPE OF INSUf{ANCE 000 000 MED EXP l0 000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY 000 000 $4 000 000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILIry GEN L AGGREGATE LIMITAPPLIES PER x []'Fef E CLAIMS MADE OCCUR LOC OTHER: Y N 3?CSEQUI172 513t t2017 5/',31l20t 8 S co[48 N SN 2 000 000xBOoILY INJURY (Per peBon)$ xxxxxxx BODILY INJURY lPer ac.ide $ xxxxxxxxx5 xxxxxxx AUTOMOBILE LIABILIry OWNED AUTOS ONLY HIREO AUTOS ONLY SCHEDULED AUTOS NON.OWNED AUTOS ONLY Y N 37CSEQUlr73 5i3l/2017 5/3 t/2018 s xxxxxxx EACH OCCURRENCE $ xxxxxxxU BRELLALIAB EXCESS LIAB OCCUR GATE s xxxxxxx DED RETENTION $ NOT APPLICABLE s x $2 000 000 E L DISE,.SE . EA EMPLOYEE 2 000 000 ll I)N 37WN 37WB QUr 170 RQUI r 7r 5/3t t2017 513U2017 5i3l '20r 8 5./31/2018 ,)000.( AI{D EUPLOYERS' LlAALiii ANY PROPRIEIOfu PARTNER/EXECUTIIE OFFICERTl\rlEMBER EXCLUOEO? DESCRIPTTON OF OPEtLqnONS bde N COMPE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY N N 1r)us^1700litl 5i3 ) i2.0t'7 5,r31r2018 st,00 AG(J 1r.000 REGA PER CLAIM & TE 59277. CIIY IS AN OESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCA RE: EN VJRONMEN TAL I]NCINEADDIf IONAI INSI]RFD AS RFS TIONS EHICLES 01(ACORD n ER G1\C;\TE o(i R B8 N I'I)\\EhS TLANDS ENTCLI NTRACO \CT BUNl t08LR:9-0,1-.18 1 I)SCTSPETOCl.ENEII,A N I)1ll LIAo B IL tY s RF]]RU I)F]L]o tt'WItJ ('EN o N']CTRA SHOULO ANY OF IHE ABOVE OESCRIBEO POLICIES BE CANCELLEO EEFORETHE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WLL BE OELIVEREO INACCORDANCE wlTH THE POLICY PROVISIONS, 13667193 MER-18 CIry OF [,,lERIDIAN fJIrHi.^B#li![asrNG MANAG ER IMERIDIAN ID 83642 **/ ,C1 AUTIIORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFICATE H OLOER CANCELLATION @1 -2015 ACORD C ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registe.ed ma rks of ACORD ORPORATION All rights reserved k INSIIRFRISI AFFOFNING'OVFP6'F I I I;-"rr-. ""r"* ^* lffif "o!o,, NUTBE"I PoLrcY EFF-I-oLrcaE tl I(MM/ooffYYYI IMM/DDryYYYI E"- """r"*"*l$ 2,ooo,ooo ffi city of ta.idi.h Detailed Sta!ement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Reporl 3590 - Iw Coaatluction Projecta 50 - Entarplita Eurtd Ftoi\ 10/1/2A16 Thlouoh 9/30/201? Xei!h 9 5164 10044 10044.d Budget \ri th Amenalment s Curlent Yea! Actuaf Budget Remaining Percent of Budget Remaining 6,339,A23.66 701, 458 . 50 384 .12 '101 ,458 .54 5,338,638.94 0. 00 99,99i 0 ,00t Capital Outlay Headworks lmprovements Headirorks/Fine Screens WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion - Design WRRE Glit Removal Equipment for the Headuolks Expansioo Proj 10044.c 82, 07 3. 00 82,0',7 3.04 0.00 0.00* Total Capital Out]ay TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,338,638.94 88.92? 6,338,638.94 88.92: Date: 6/a/t'1 03:09:27 PH ?,128,555.15 189,916-22 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7R PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Amendment to January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement Between City of Meridian and West Ada School District for PY2015 Community Development Block Grant Funds Adjusting Grant Allocation Amount from $65,000 to $80,000 for the Meridian Picnic Shelter Project MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS FIRST AMENDMENT TO JANUARY 24, 2017 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR PY 2015 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS This First Amendment To January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement Between City Of Meridian And West Ada School District for PY 2015 Community Development Block Grant Funds ("First Amendment") is entered into this 6th day of June, 2017 by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("City") and West Ada School District, a school district organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("Subrecipient"). WHEREAS, on January 24, 2017, City and Subrecipient entered into a Subrecipient Agreemeni Between City Of Merichan And Wesl Acla School Districi for PY 2015 Community Development Block Grant Funds ("January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement"); and WHEREAS, by this First Amendment, the parties desire to: 1) increase the amount provided to Subrecipient for the purposes outlined in the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement, from $65,000 to $80,000; 2) clarify that the term of the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement will run through September 30, 2017; and 3) establish that the Subrecipient's activities will be funded from both Program Year 2015 (PY15) CDBG funds and unallocated Program Year 2016 (PY 16) CDBG funds; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties, the Parties agree as follows: I. Section I(A) modified. Section I(A) of the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: A. Activities. Subrecipient shall use City's PY 15 and unallocated PY 16 CDBG funds in the amount of eighty thousand ($80,000) to purchase and install a picnic shelter and park- like amenities to be located at Meridian Elementary School, a public school. Specifically, Subrecipient shall undertake the following activities: 1. Utilize an open competitive bid process which satisfies Idaho Code section 67-2806 for the selection of a vendor and installer of the picnic shelter and amenities. 2. Consult with the City CDBG Administrator and the City Purchasing Manager prior to advertisement of the bid documents and prior to signing the vendor contract for the equipment and installation to ensure inclusion of proper language related to the Davis Bacon Act requirements and Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. 3. Contractually require selected vendor to comply with Davis Bacon Act wage requirements and reporting for the installation of the shelter and equipment. 4. Ensure selected vendor submits all required Davis Bacon wage documentation, including weekly payroll reports, for the installation of the picnic shelter and amenities to West Ada School District or to City of Meridian. FIRST ADDENDUM TO SuaRL'CIE'II:NT AGREEMENT— WLs'r ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT PAGE I OF 3 5. Purchase and install picnic shelter and amenities at Meridian Elementary School. Submit draw down request to the City for reimbursement of said purchase up to $80,000. II. Section I(B) modified. Section I(B) of the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: B. National Objective. Subrecipient certifies that the activities carried out with City's PY 15 and unallocated PY 16 CDBG funds provided by City under this Agreement will meet one or more of the CDBG program's National Objectives as defined in 24 CFR § 570.208. Specifically, Subrecipient's activities under this agreement shall benefit a low to moderate income area (24 CFR § 570.208(a)(1)). III.Section I(F) modified. Section I(F) of the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: F. Time of performance. Services of Subrecipient shall start no earlier than October I, 2016 and end on September 30, 2017. The term of this Agreement and the provisions herein shall be extended to cover any additional time period during which Subrecipient remains in control of CDBG funds or other CDBG assets, including program income. IV. Section II(B)(I) modified. Section II(B)(1) of the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: B. Financial Management. 1. Budget. Subrecipient agrees that it shall use City's PY15 and unallocated PY16 CDBG funds in the amount of eighty thousand ($80,000) to purchase and install a picnic shelter and park -like amenities to be located at Meridian Elementary School, Meridian, Idaho. City may require a detailed budget breakdown, and Subrecipient shall provide such information in a timely fashion, and in the form and content prescribed by City. V. Section II(C)(4) modified. Section 11(C)(4) of the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 4. Draw requests, it is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by City under this Agreement shall not exceed $80,000. Draw downs for the payment of eligible expenses shall be made against the activity specified, in accordance with performance and as expenses are incurred by Subrecipient. Draw requests shall only be accepted on official City and/or HUD forms and must be completed in full to be processed. All draw requests are to be submitted monthly, no later than twenty-one (21) days after the end of the month for which reimbursement is being submitted. Draw requests shall include the following: copy of the invoice for all equipment and services from selected vendor and proof of payment by the Subrecipient to the vendor. FIRST ADDENDUM TO SUBRECR'IENT AGREEMENT- WEST ADA SCHOOL DIS,rRICT PAGE 2 OF 3 VI.Section V(A) modified. Section ll(C)(4) of the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: A. Notices. All notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, addressed as follows: City of Meridian West Ada School District Attn: Christopher Pope Attn: Marcus Meyers CDBG Program Administrator Principal, Meridian Elementary 33 E. Broadway Avenue 1303 E. Central Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Either party may change its authorized representative and/or address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner herein provided. VII. January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement Fully in Effect. The intent and effect of this First Amendment is to increase the amount provided to Subrecipient for the purposes outlined in the January 24, 20I7 Subrecipient Agreement, from $65,000 to $80,000; clarify that the term of the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement will run through September 30, 2017; and establish that the Subrecipient's activities will be funded from both Program Year 2015 (PY15) CDBG funds and unallocated Program Year 2016 (PY16) CDBG funds. Except as expressly set forth herein, this First Amendment does not otherwise modify or alter any term or condition of the January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement in any way. The January 24, 2017 Subrecipient Agreement remains in full effect, and all terms and conditions thereof are incorporated into this First Amendment as though fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this First Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. SUBRECIPIENT: West Ada School District I &A4 L LA By: Dr. M Ann Ranells District Superintendent CITY: City of Meridian By: Tam�,e'Weerd, Go�V0RATEDAjj0 Attest: T 2 �ilYu( o w jDIAIV* Jay co S EAL Q, ity Clerk FIRST ADDENOUIVI To SuBRrcIPILNT AGRErML•NT-- WEs'r ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT PAGE 3 OF 3 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7S PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approval for Finance to Pay Vendor Payments of $1,578,788.78 MEETING NOTES 9 APPROYEP Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 17-0192, 17-0035, Ustick/Meridian Intersection 12,302.50 01 General Fund AMY MERRILL instructor fee-Ballet, HipHop, Lyrical, Jazz 5/2-5/25/17; 54 1,400.00 01 General Fund AUTOMATIC RAIN CO DBA HORIZON weed eater trim line - qty 2 89.78 01 General Fund BME FIRE FIGHTER SUPPLY, LLC.220/Name badge for uniform 18.20 01 General Fund BME FIRE FIGHTER SUPPLY, LLC.220/Pants for stock, qty2 209.00 01 General Fund BOISE SOFTBALL UMPIRES ASSOC.17-0253 softball umpire services 6/5-6/9/17 - qty 54 games 1,458.54 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC 220/Veh Rep, MF030, leak, alignment, rear brakes, differenti 1,473.49 01 General Fund BSN SPORTS, INC.bleacher rubber bumpers for Homecourt - qty 6 37.47 01 General Fund Campbell Tractor Co.John Deere 1445 #6 mower throttle cable - qty 1 23.48 01 General Fund Campbell Tractor Co.John Deere 1445 mower blades - qty 3 70.77 01 General Fund Campbell Tractor Co.John Deere 997 gauge wheels & hardware - qty 42 283.66 01 General Fund Campbell Tractor Co.Kleiner tire/wheel for 1445 broom for #5 mower - qty 1 52.60 01 General Fund CASCADE FENCE COMPANY, INC.latches for Kleiner Park east gate repairs - qty 2 290.00 01 General Fund CASCADE FENCE COMPANY, INC.Stretched chain link for Tully Park gate 45.00 01 General Fund CASCADE FENCE COMPANY, INC.toprail for Tully Park gates - qty 96 feet 158.00 01 General Fund CHRISTOPHER POPE Per Diem, Christopher Pope, CDBG Training, Portland OR, 6/26 288.00 01 General Fund CITY OF BOISE IT COMMUNICATIONS 220/lProgram MFD Dual Band Radios & 1 XTL VHF Radio 520.00 01 General Fund CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES liquid fertilizer for Kleiner & Settlers 2,686.10 01 General Fund CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES Tengard insecticide for all park trees - qty 3 147.93 01 General Fund ELI DANIEL Per Diem, E. Daniel, Troubleshooting TCP/IP Networks with Wi 416.00 01 General Fund FEDEX KINKOS FY2018 Annual Budget Book Production 1,859.65 01 General Fund FRANKLIN BUILDING SUPPLY stain for mutt mitt stations at all parks - qty 1 gallon 45.56 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY CO hand sanitizer cloths & cleaners for restrooms - qty 108 963.78 01 General Fund GREEN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, INC.Refund: Green Village Dev., Surety-2016-0102, Heritage Grove 63,879.17 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY 1804 & 1806 sam sprinklers for Tully Park x 6 22.18 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY sprinklers for all parks - qty 7 284.53 01 General Fund HR SPECIALIST #43611942, Renewal The HR Specialist, 5/2/17-5/1/18 88.00 01 General Fund HR SPECIALIST #43683020, Employment Law Subscription Renewal,5/2/17-5/1/18 88.00 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE 2017SummerActivityGuidepublication x 27,750; inserts x 16000 4,083.62 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE Background, Employment Testing - May 2017 444.00 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE Backgrounds/Fingerprinting 604.00 Date: 6/15/17 12:29:20 PM Page: 1 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund IN THE BAG PROMOTIONS, INC.Duffel Bags and embroidery for Picnic Gifts - Qty 4 120.00 01 General Fund INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR, INC.Microsoft Surface Dock-Docking Station 85.00 01 General Fund INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR, INC.Microsoft Surface Pro 4-12.9-Core i7 6650U-8GB RAM 256GB SSD 1,200.00 01 General Fund ITsavvy LLC HP V244h LED Monitor 1,061.80 01 General Fund KATHERINE RIGGS instructor fee - Hot Hula Fitness 5/4-5/25/17 - qty 3 76.80 01 General Fund KATHY DRURY-BOGLE, PHR BEST/EDP Development & Delivery for May 2017 2,000.00 01 General Fund KQXR, SJOT, KRVB, KTHI Summer Camp Advertising on 94.9 The River, 5/1/17-5/28/17 1,000.00 01 General Fund KQXR, SJOT, KRVB, KTHI Summer Camp Advertising on 94.9 The River, 5/29/17-6/4/17 500.00 01 General Fund L.N. CURTIS AND SONS 220/Boots, Mike Myers 270.75 01 General Fund L.N. CURTIS AND SONS 220/Zippers for Station boots, 3015 HNYWL, Size 10 71.17 01 General Fund LAURIE MCELROY instructor fee - Yoga 4/17-5/27/17 - qty 48 1,336.00 01 General Fund LOWE'S 220/9V batteries for Smoke Alarm Program 342.24 01 General Fund MARTHA SHAYNE HIRSCHI Martha Hirschi, 2017 Historic Preservation Student Essay Com 250.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pre-Pay Fire#1, #8712, Low Balance as of 6/15/17 2,000.00 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pre-Pay HR, #3590, Low Balance as of 6/15/17 1,600.00 01 General Fund MERCER HEALTH & BENEFITS 17-0060, Health & Benefits Consulting for June 2017 4,166.67 01 General Fund MOORE & ELIA, LLP Courthouse Matter 2,460.00 01 General Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS hose fitting for sprayer - qty 1 11.37 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee-Cheer,Ballet,Tap,Jazz,Tumble 5/1-5/25/17 x 64 1,480.00 01 General Fund NORCO 220/Calibration gas for air monitors 255.00 01 General Fund NORCO 220/Repair two 4-gas meters 527.71 01 General Fund NORCO cylinder rental for welding gas - May 2017 42.16 01 General Fund NORCO welding helmet for Lanark Parks Shop - qty 1 159.00 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.220/paper & index markers - qty 4 29.07 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Keyboard, Wireless, Desktop 23.79 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.laminating pouches & tape - qty 2 40.34 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Office Supplies 24.80 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.pushpins & markers - qty 3 11.41 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Benefits Expandable Folders 141.74 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Binder clips, Avery tabs, Note Tabs for CB 89.19 01 General Fund OXARC, INC.220/Oxygen, Medical, fill 7 bottles 35.80 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER diesel for transfer tank 15; unleaded fuel for truck 15 292.20 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER diesel fuel for transfer tank; unleaded for truck 13 233.17 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER Fuel for Ford Fusion, Lic# C18641 23.99 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER premium unleaded fuel for fleet truck 22 69.61 Date: 6/15/17 12:29:20 PM Page: 2 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER super unleaded fuel for fleet truck 5 72.46 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 11 63.56 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 16 45.79 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 2 65.95 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for Toro equipment 28.02 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for truck 29 78.00 01 General Fund PLATT Assorted tools, pliers, screwdrivers - qty 13 339.13 01 General Fund PLATT Light bulbs - Qty 90 235.80 01 General Fund PORTAPROS, LLC portable toilets for HMS ball fields 5/8-6/4/17 732.00 01 General Fund PORTAPROS, LLC portable toilets for Jabil Fields 4/25-5/22/17 249.00 01 General Fund RANDY S LATTIMER instructor fee - Line Dancing 5/7-5/28/17 - qty 16 256.00 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86084920, Copier Lease 6/17 & Additional Copies 5/17 444.17 01 General Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY paint rollers for Centennial Park restrooms - qty 5 17.12 01 General Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY primer for Centennial Park restroom - qty 1 10.52 01 General Fund SAFETY ENTERPRISE, INC.05/2017: Fire Extinguishers,Fueling-Gas/Diesel,Drive-Busses 75.00 01 General Fund SHADOWS EMBROIDERY & SCREEN PRINTING Police Spring Safety Fling shirts qty 11 369.98 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC.220/Paper shredding, St. 1, 2 & Admin 92.93 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC.Document Shredding May 2017 108.78 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC.HR Shredding, May 2017 51.15 01 General Fund SILVER CREEK sprinkler parts for Kleiner Community Garden - qty 36 13.68 01 General Fund SIMPLOT PARTNERS mound clay for Heritage MS ball fields - qty 6 bags 117.00 01 General Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY sign posts & parts for pathways - qty 160 1,234.60 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/BR35, MF029, install new foam system, change pump local 7,981.67 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/E34,MF018,repair hose reel & foam system 1,043.86 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF019, Preventative Maintenance 534.00 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF024, repair power to cradlepoint router 180.74 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF027, Preventative Maintenance 161.37 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF030, Lug nuts loose causing noise 216.75 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF035,repair battery & wiring to MDT charger,new battery 985.49 Date: 6/15/17 12:29:20 PM Page: 3 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF037, E33, Lub bushings, ladder bump stops missing, 932.19 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF037, Preventative Maintenance 750.96 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/MF040, software update for emission system 255.00 01 General Fund STAR FIRE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE DIVISION 220/Prev Mtn on E-35, MF041 641.98 01 General Fund STORMWIND LLC Microsoft All Access Bundle 24mo 3,980.00 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Cell phone case and screen protector 22.25 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Imorden S-60c Handheld Camera and Video Stablilizer for Cano 105.94 01 General Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC.17-0114 5MileCreekPathSegD design services contract 05/2017 636.00 01 General Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC.17-0114 FiveMileCreekPathSegmentD design services - 02/2017 2,152.00 01 General Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC.17-0217 Lemp-Larkwood Path connection design services 5/2017 1,596.00 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE ship TRC cards to TRC Irrigation Remotes 10.74 01 General Fund TRANE U.S. INC.Chiller repairs 4,607.10 01 General Fund TREVOR SUND Reimburse Trevor Sund for additional cost of registration fo 75.00 01 General Fund TROPHY HOUSE PROS 2017 Summer Fun Kickoff Tournament trophies - qty 16 460.32 01 General Fund TWO OCEAN PRINT 2017 summer staff shirts - qty 24 259.00 01 General Fund UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 17-0009, UPRR 1,692.63 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 742047228-00001 Parks HPN Modems FY17, 5/2/17 - 6/1/17 153.46 01 General Fund VIKING INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS fittings for hose reel at Lanark Parks Shop - qty 3 99.68 01 General Fund WAHOOZ FAMILY FUN ZONE MYAC/TAC year-end party on 5/22/17 - qty 32 415.68 01 General Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 220/Nupla D-Grip, Qty 4 65.72 01 General Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 220/Yellow Wildland FF gear, 16 coats, 16 pants 4,048.00 01 General Fund WESTERN FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION 220/Registration, C. Butterfield, FORCE Conference, Boulder 550.00 01 General Fund WESTERN FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION 220/Registration, M. Niemeyer, FORCE Conference, Boulder CO, 550.00 01 General Fund WILBUR-ELLIS CO.Trimec & Dimension turf chemicals for all parks - qty 10 3,280.00 01 General Fund WINDOW GENIE OF BOISE window tinting on gym floors at homecourt 99.00 01 General Fund WW GRAINGER, INC 220/55 gallon of Diesel Exhaust Fluid for St 5 297.61 01 General Fund WW GRAINGER, INC 220/linseed oil, cable ties, tire dressing - qty 3 115.93 Date: 6/15/17 12:29:20 PM Page: 4 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount Total 01 General Fund 160,020.50 07 Impact Fund SPF WATER ENGINEERING, LLC prof svcs Hillsdale Park well const/final design 05/2017 3,840.75 07 Impact Fund TERRA ENVIRO CONSULTING, INC.soil testing for Reta Huskey Park 300.00 07 Impact Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC.16-0355 A&E services for 77-Acre South Meridian Park 05/2017 50,188.45 07 Impact Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC.16-0816 prof svcs Keith Bird Legacy Park master plan 05/2017 2,495.00 Total 07 Impact Fund 56,824.20 20 Grant Fund governmental BEFORE THE MOVIE, INC.17-0223, MADC Natural High On Screen Advertising - 5/17-9/17 8,342.00 20 Grant Fund governmental MERIDIAN FOOD BANK 17-0273 / Reimbursement for Food Purchases for CDBG PY16 12,059.69 20 Grant Fund governmental MURRAYSMITH INC 17-0263,Todd & Sandalwood Lighting design through 4/30/17 6,684.50 20 Grant Fund governmental RICOH USA, INC MADC Printer/Copier Model MP C306SPF 1,995.00 20 Grant Fund governmental THE LAMAR COMPANIES MADC Natural High Billboard (Digital) - 6/12/17-9/3/17 5,100.00 20 Grant Fund governmental THE LAMAR COMPANIES MADC Natural High Billboard (Vinyl) - 5/29/17-6/25/17 2,750.00 Total 20 Grant Fund governmental 36,931.19 60 Enterprise Fund 2M COMPANY Seal water motor to rebuild spare pump 610.00 60 Enterprise Fund A COMPANY INC WRRF Capacity Expansion FY15, services 5/1-5/28 2017 90.50 60 Enterprise Fund ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 17-0035, Ustick, Meridian/Locust Grove, Service Thru 5/25/17 37,565.85 60 Enterprise Fund ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 17-0192, 17-0035, Ustick/Meridian Intersection 2,625.97 60 Enterprise Fund ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC 16-0260, SCADA Upgrade, engineer services from 4/25-5/24/17 342.50 60 Enterprise Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 17-0122 May 2017 Statements processing 14,792.24 60 Enterprise Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 17-0123 IVR Transactions May 2017 1,090.25 60 Enterprise Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 17-0124/ Lockbox transactions May 2017 1,631.49 60 Enterprise Fund BROWN & CALDWELL 17-0118, WRRF Facility Plan Update FY17, 3/31/17-4/27/17 29,863.34 60 Enterprise Fund CAREER UNIFORMS Sun hats for Keith Slack, Tony Parks, Chris Voigts, Dave 65.00 Date: 6/15/17 12:29:20 PM Page: 5 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund CHALLENGER COMPANIES, INC.16-0403, S. Black Cat Lift Station Improvement,as of 5/31/17 64,035.62 60 Enterprise Fund CLARK R TORELL Refund, 45250110-02, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1444 E Sicily St, Custom 23.79 60 Enterprise Fund COMPASSUS Refund, 99010891-01, Dumpster Deposit 680 S Progress Ave Ste 276.02 60 Enterprise Fund CONDOC South Black Cat Lift Station Improvement, as of 4/31/17 49.99 60 Enterprise Fund CONDOC WRRF Capacity Expansion, services as of 5/31/17 49.99 60 Enterprise Fund CONDOC WRRF Centrate Modifications Services as of 5/31/2017 16.00 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Building Maintenance 11.97 60 Enterprise Fund DAHLE CONSTRUCTION Well 28 Sewer Extension, Connect To Existing Manhole, 5/26/1 4,725.00 60 Enterprise Fund DAVID COATS Refund, 24700138-02, Wat/Sew/Trash, 916 N Bluffwood Ln, Cust 107.68 60 Enterprise Fund DRY PROS Refund, 99010860-01 Dumpster Deposit, 1475 N Santa Rosa Pl, 16.43 60 Enterprise Fund ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS, INC.Solids filters 301.98 60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Vehicle Maintenance 5,525.50 60 Enterprise Fund EXCLUSIVE WIRELESS Refund, 99010889-01, Dumpster Deposit, 1800 S Meridian Rd St 120.77 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Equipment Supplies 462.75 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Senus Water Meters 9,938.88 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC FIA reagent 348.98 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Nitrile gloves-size medium 181.40 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Reuse C1 analyzer reagent 396.90 60 Enterprise Fund FORSGREN ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0230, Water Main Ext. N Pengrove, services as of 5/25/17 1,783.75 60 Enterprise Fund FREDRIC J & RUTH N BETHUNE Refund, 03035060-04, Wat/Sew/Trash, 03035060-04, 1812 W Divi 89.49 60 Enterprise Fund GARY & KATHLEEN JOHNSON Refund, 19101810-02, Wat/Sew/Trash, 4098 E Spearfish Dr, Cus 28.60 60 Enterprise Fund GEM STATE COMMUNICATIONS INC Pager Radio Communciations 1,663.80 60 Enterprise Fund GRANITE EXCAVATION, INC 17-0203,Sewer Main Rep.Wash. & Carlton,services thru 4/25/17 65,507.99 60 Enterprise Fund GRANT MECHANICAL, INC Labor to troubleshoot mini split on air conditioner at S.127.50 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Infiltration & Inflow Monitoring/Meter brackets - Qty 4 3,084.27 60 Enterprise Fund HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS Equipment Maintenance & Repair 400.32 60 Enterprise Fund HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS Line Wat/Sewer Maintenance 1.86 Date: 6/15/17 12:29:20 PM Page: 6 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS Parts for digester 3 project 90.26 60 Enterprise Fund HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS Well Maintenance & Repair 8.64 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Shop Supplies 20.41 60 Enterprise Fund JAMES R. & MARIANN M. WALL Refund, 04700190-03, Wat/Sew/Trash, 5809 N Arliss Ave, Title 108.64 60 Enterprise Fund JEFF & ANGELA CHRISTENSEN Refund, 09130207-03, Wat/Sew/Trash, 87 W White Sands Dr, Cus 106.51 60 Enterprise Fund JOHN & MARSHA CHASTAIN Refund, 14191680-02, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2294 N Bent Grass Ln, 54.68 60 Enterprise Fund JUB ENGINEERS 16-0247,S. Black Cat Lift Station Improvement,3/5/17-4/29/17 3,214.80 60 Enterprise Fund JUB ENGINEERS 17-0073,On Call Modeling & Master Plan services 3/5-4/29/17 3,177.30 60 Enterprise Fund K J HOLDINGS Refund, 21980027-01, Sprinkler, Title Company Paid Late 63.55 60 Enterprise Fund KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES Bearings to rebuild seal water pump 26.76 60 Enterprise Fund KATHERINE B. SCHMIDT Refund, 17341016-02, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2526 N Elk Cove Way, Aut 70.98 60 Enterprise Fund LOCAL DUMPSTER RENTAL Refund, 99010257-01, Dumpster Deposit Local Dumpster Rental, 286.15 60 Enterprise Fund MARY STEWART & GERALD SKIVER Refund, 22504034-04, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1071 N Petersburg Way, T 34.96 60 Enterprise Fund MASTER ROOTER PLUMBING Sewer Main Replacemtn E Williams, service 5/31/17 295.00 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC Pre-Pay WW, #8548, Low Balance as of 6/15/17 2,000.00 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC PW #1, #8639, 5/28/2017 Statement -1,110.58 60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC PW #2 5/28/17 charges 677.67 60 Enterprise Fund MOUNTAIN WATERWORKS, INC 16-0322,WRRF Centrate Modifications design, Thru 5/26/17 145.50 60 Enterprise Fund MOUNTAIN WATERWORKS, INC 17-0218, WRRF Boise River Outfall Pump Station, thru 5/26/17 1,724.00 60 Enterprise Fund MURRAYSMITH INC 17-0052,Infiltration & Inflow Monitoring services 4/30/17 903.50 60 Enterprise Fund MURRAYSMITH INC 17-0091, Water Main Ext. W Amity/S Linder, thru 4/31/17 7,654.50 60 Enterprise Fund MURRAYSMITH INC 17-0173, Water Rep/Sewer Main Ext., service thru 4/30 2017 5,585.50 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Compact towels 129.48 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Cylinder rental 61.44 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Eye flush bottles 139.92 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Antifreeze for equipment 51.96 Date: 6/15/17 12:29:20 PM Page: 7 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Binder index tabs & badge holder clips 116.34 60 Enterprise Fund OXARC, INC.Sodium Hypochlorite 3,522.05 60 Enterprise Fund PACIFIC STEEL & RECYCLING Panel mount for collections equipment facility project 192.58 60 Enterprise Fund PARAMOUNT SUPPLY CO.packing for plunger pump 237.00 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT Breaker for post air blower #2 3,158.60 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT Electrical power cable 95.81 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT Nylon cloth cartridge & magnet 67.13 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT Replacement panel cover for control panel, secondary pumping 816.51 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT Returned breaker-reference inv#N048679 (1,515.28) 60 Enterprise Fund QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES, INC.Lab equipment calibration services 2,015.00 60 Enterprise Fund REPUBLIC SERVICES - TRANSFER STATION Biosolids disposal 15,364.50 60 Enterprise Fund REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.Republic Trash Services Contract May 2017 1,017,197.67 60 Enterprise Fund ROCKY MOUNTAIN ROLL Project 10513, rental of 2 round tables for PWW Expo 6/8/17 17.50 60 Enterprise Fund ROOT RENTS Weed burner rental 55.00 60 Enterprise Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC.Document Shredding May 2017 70.29 60 Enterprise Fund SIGNS, ETC Advertising Promotional 240.00 60 Enterprise Fund SIGNS, ETC Banners for Hydrovac & CCTV van for PW Week tour & Expo 150.00 60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY Mobilization & signage for work on Locust Grove 386.75 60 Enterprise Fund SPF WATER ENGINEERING, LLC 15-0371, Source Water Protection/Rights App., as of 5/31/17 227.50 60 Enterprise Fund SULLIVAN REBERGER 17-0008, Lobbying fees May 2017 4,000.00 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook Book for D. Miles 16.03 60 Enterprise Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP T-shirts for Poop Scoot 440.80 60 Enterprise Fund TD RESTORATIONS Refund, 99010884-01, Dumpster Deposit, 2765 W Ladle Rapids S 375.09 60 Enterprise Fund TELANSWER, INC After Hour Answering Service 262.10 60 Enterprise Fund TOKAY SOFTWARE Software Maintenance 790.00 60 Enterprise Fund VERMEER ROCKY MOUNTAIN, INC.Equipment Maintenance 45.00 60 Enterprise Fund WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL mats for collections bldg at plant 880.92 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Gasket to repair spare pump, air gap water seal, site 10.90 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Pump seal to repair spare pump, air gap water seal, site 21.13 60 Enterprise Fund ZACHARY S. WAGNER Refund, 18422076-03, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2015 N Wingate Pl, Custo 58.91 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 1,325,012.89 Date: 6/15/17 12:29:20 PM Page: 8 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount Report Total 1,578,788.78 Date: 6/15/17 12:29:20 PM Page: 9 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9 PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0007 ITEM TITLE: Goddard Creek FUNIC Hearing Continued trom June or Goddard Creek- - y Brian Porter Located 2780 W. McMillan Road 1. Request: Rezone of 12.38 Acres of Land from R-4 to the R-40 (5 Acres) and the C -C (7.38 Acres) Zoning Districts 2. Request: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to Change the Land Use Designation on 12.38 Acres of Land from Office and High Density Residential to Mixed -Use Community 3. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Self -Storage Facility Consisting of Ten (10) Ri iilriinne nn Annrnyimntt-IN/ 7 RR ArrPe of I nnrl in the Prnr)ncPrl C' -C-' 7nninn nictrirt MEETING NOTES mf APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: June 20. 2017 Project Number: Project Name: Item # 9A H-2017-0007 Goddard Creek Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (Y/N) &, 1 .1 rc3 1, _e 4 Av 14L 0 Al SLv `-,, 60 ro o v 06 �z.iz rAa� Cf- k V► � > k e p I t�o k i v\ I� L11da LJ! i 1cw- 1` Y-1 A, t J4,4 aL��J o, - A zA-1UP_ PU—or�;4n 6i7W_— CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: June 20, 2017 Item # Project Number: H-2017-0007 Project Name: Goddard Creek MA Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (Y/N) Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9B PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0041 ITEM TITLE: Geddes Subdivision Public Hearing for Geddes Subdivision (H-2017-0041) by Schultz Development Located Southeast of the W. Ustick Road and N. Black Cat Road Intersection 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 2.08 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Ten (10) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 2.08 Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning Dis MEETING NOTES L, xe �0 , Jjo 1?1 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS % CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: June 20, 2017 Item # Project Number: Project Name: H-2017-0041 Geddes Subdivision Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (YIN) > G� �. - 6if 1,4 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 1 OA PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Fire Department: Public Education Budget Amendment Not -to -Exceed $13,830 MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS c') C (D w T N O J CLW C O (D D 3 rD 3 (D _ T O � n O �• �, 3 (D C C C c C C= � O C7 rt o o w N N N N N N N N N N lD LD lD rt LD lDlD lD ID lD O O O O, 0 0 0 0 0 0 H rD v r+ 0 •1 ( h G) # O O 02. O O O O O O a !1 Yi C C N N w 0 o Q n - N N N N T N N lD N lD N lD N lD N l0 O rD O O O O m 3 0 N O A A A = T N A A A A >-0 m ^ N Vt N _ (D .O+ O N � O 'a lNll W N o A J O o Ol O O 0 O N O v w O rt O O O O v m 3 0 v v T C U, 3 O m 3 0 .T 11 (D T N A C w w N r� \ 0 G. Oy m 0 3 m Q v (D y m o O O O O O -! c O O O O o O O O .-r y 7S � 0 T in 1/� V� V w m D 1"h ❑ ❑ � ^ co 0 O n (D d r� N N N v W — rD fDD (p W lD N CD O G rD 0 W O O O O O W (D AM` O1 fD a O c G) y O -n r+D1 � m wo=fD *rD (o � � o \ n Q m o 3 3 (D 3 7 � m 0- c rf .Q 3 C °q H rD v r+ 0 •1 ( h yJ � � V m a,ahiJ oi� N N N N ;A f i N CL £08� U1 O O O O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ iz �1 J G) Z- IL C C C N O C C C N N N N N N N N N lD N lD N lD N lD N lD N l0 N O N lD O O O O O N N O A A A A A A A A 0 0 N Vt N _ (D O w T C lNll W N o A N O o Ol O O 0 O O O O O O O m O 3 v T C U, 3 0 .T 11 o G� fD w N A 0 G. Oy m n (D y O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .-r y 7S � 0 T m D 1"h ❑ ❑ � ^ co (D O n (D d n rD fDD (p 0 N CD O G rD fD a ((DD G) y © o 0. � m G) (o � � o \ n w o 3 (D 3 m 0- c 3 °q rmi O O a r0 -o -0 o' w w D Dq N 3 N O O O O O N O D LD O C) w O yJ � � V m a,ahiJ oi� N N N N ;A f i N CL £08� U1 O O O O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ iz �1 J 'O 7 O O :k YL \ G) Z- IL C C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N lD N lD N lD N lD N lD N l0 N O N lD O O O O O O O O A A A A A A A A 0 0 0 0 _ (D O w T C lNll W N o A N O o Ol 0 O O O O O O O O O m O 3 v T C O 3 0 .T 11 o G� fD w n D (D 0 G. Oy m n (D y m m � rD 0 o v v YL 7t (D U D O .-r y 7S � 0 T 1"h ❑ ❑ � ^ co (D O n (D � n rD fDD (p 0 N CD fD a ((DD 'O 7 O O :k YL \ G) Z- IL j T wO 3 3 3 0 D 0 (D T T I N CD (D (D C N 3 o 7 = r� ^ 1 s w y a Al FD < _ CL O J _ (D O w T C m (D (D N m s CD 1 O. '06 � V1 O O 3 v Q m rn (D _ 11 o .ww 3 n D (D 0 G. Oy m n (D y +^ rt Yk o v v YL 7t (D U T O .-r y 7S � T 1"h ❑ ❑ co (D C (D rD fDD N Q fD a ((DD G) y © o 0. � m G) \ o \ n (D (D 3 'O 7 O O :k YL \ G) Z- IL 3 3 3 0 D 0 (D T rt no rl (D (D C N 3 Z Z ^ 1 s w w w m FD < _ CL c n _ (D O w T C m (D (D N m s CD 1 O. '06 � V1 O O 3 v Q m (D _ 11 o .ww 3 �T 0 G. Oy m n +^ N o v v YL 7t (D U T O T ❑ ❑ co (D (D (D rD fDD N Q O a ((DD © o 0. � m D o n (D (D 3 O O 3 °q (D O O a r0 -o -0 w w D - ,t Z- IL 3 3 3 v O (D (D C zr 3 Z Z ^ s w w w m m `" < 3 3 CL c n M O w T C (D (D (D N a < a m O. '06 O O 3 11 .ww 3 G. Oy ID v v YL 7t (D U T T ❑ ❑ (D (D rD fDD N © O O (A n 3 -,i < * i.,!Lo W J r O fD S w (D 0ftIn- ;, Q ;, ,0 3 (DI O j D S T S 3 3 j 3 3 n rD t J" ',!3 rt 3 Gl 3 Qo m 0 3 O N rt ��I, v3�i 07 3 rD rD rt n N Q I N ru 4O N r a rp i M 3 M iZ .+ fD ° fap I N (SD Q. m J I i3 QCL 0 m ry i rD C A O CL c fD 0 3 O,Q 3 0 c i v 0 o 01 < fND N n J N rt O O O c J 4 rD O rt 3 S R I °- Z n O 3 O O rt 00 v 0- m U rt c+ Q _ Z. 3 fu (D N ' j 3' 's n (D N rD D rD .nF °- N cr C < 3 (D tr 4 h CO ' rDD 77 O N O rt C 0 < N 3 N tr Ln 0 (D N z ,v H w o O O N 4 N O% O Z. f O ti C rD O Q I to 4 f? } �0 :0 �. a M n OrD c (D n ! iC `. (D a I (D L o N oZIi 0 _ n o N:3 Ulii rD C:, i ° Z m < O N O rD N N fD rD 0 c R rD 0 6 a O C)- fD Q 0 Q fD T3 3 M 3 NJ N 0 6 rD zy N (D 0 N d 0 C n rD O rD S a 0 0- 0 ao n a O O .3r fD N O Q S O (D n Drti Q a _+.. n o R° o a n 3 0 0 7 N rD [U Q rD 3 m o N C S to o p Q O O 3 O O T N � C V 7 3 �3. N 0 DD 0 ' ELS C D, S O p ? & 3 n ° 3 nb_0 F o N m N i r O a rD n <� N < 3 CD !D N D fD 3 � A T fD = G) a N v 3 h rD t/t N Gl L O O N T N fT m O :0 J i `r r i ! i o v -o 0 O tnI 1A t n n O eN�F {A 1/T to 1 d F T N N O <D � d T N � O N j O (D fU T N N O F-� N fU o : P R m m D m 9 3 r 3 C fD a z M D, a 3 n rD I.. 0 3 (D J N O O D W O CD 53, N O -m W TT � \V D 3 D CL O C, 10 rD o w o D ° O 0 0 rD N `� N -1 rD O rt Q 3 p rt �' _ m CD o m ^ E EA T C rD n N n' nrt+• rD -. N M O O 3 D Q 7 W (i (D (D O C o (D 0 -°-a w m o (D ? N N C) v � N � o n' CD CD n 3 D, C 3 n d CL v ((DD (D N D- 0 fD o v -o 0 O tnI 1A t n n O eN�F {A 1/T to 1 d F T N N O <D � d T N � O N j O (D fU T N N O F-� N fU o : P R m m D m 9 3 r 3 C fD a z M D, a 3 n rD I.. 0 3 (D J N O O D W O CD 53, N O -m W TT � \V D 3 D CL O o ad O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 R'1 " m r H r r N r r V N ro P. O r p P• O r p P. O r p P. O r o P. O r p S P. O r pa 0 r 0 ti .. o m -•P w m�.0 w m�.P w mom. w (D— w m�.p w m�.0 w m -.P w rt —M N rt —M N rt —M to rt —M N rt —M N rt —M N rt —M N rt —M N rr y � O P. O P- O N• O N- 0 1- O H• 0 Y- O H- W y N N N N N N N N N (2 l7 O N N N N N N N N N O m N N W ko %0 ko to ko ID �o P. N O O O O O O O O O m r Y N OO OO N O O O O O K N Lo w w w w w w w w f] 4] 0 & & IP IP & &. 0 ,P dl O \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 (¢D 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rt 10n rD oro .t7 0ro—t7 0 N -,ty 0 I ty otd t7 aD ,\ 0ro�t7 W .'T^ O) O Kro O O Kro 0 O K'd 0 O O Kro O 0 K ro O 0 0 K0 O V \ P• O r p P. O r p P• O r p P. O r p P. O r o P. O r p S P. O r pa 0 r 0 ti 10n rD oro .t7 0ro—t7 0 N -,ty 0 I ty otd t7 0 1 t7 O'agtI 0ro�t7 nro t7 a O Kro O O Kro 0 O K'd 0 O Kro 0 O Kro O 0 K ro O 0 K 0 0 K0 O O Kro 0 \ P• O r p P. O r p P• O r p P. O r p P. O r o P. O r p P. O r0 P. O r pa 0 r 0 ti m�•� w m -•P w m�.0 w m�.P w mom. w (D— w m�.p w m�.0 w m -.P w m N rt —M N rt —M N rt —M to rt —M N rt —M N rt —M N rt —M N rt —M N rr y O N• O P. O P- O N• O N- 0 1- O H• 0 Y- O H- W rt rt rt rt rt rt rt Y p p p p 0rt p p prt 0 N N N N w N N N N m N N O O O O O O O n ro N N OO OO N O O O O O K r r OD OO OD 0 0 0 0 f1 O 0 o OD OO OD 0 0 0 o O U) rt m P. F, t7 0 F, N W r N In 0(D rr M ` N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ m m m \ \ r r r r r r r 0 K m m to o o m %o N P rt w \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ P- r N N N N N N N N N C 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 N 0 N 0 r 0 r o N m t m m ON 3 -4 m P. LQ 0 m x :Do ca W m t7 '] Oo y ro U Vi w a O h] n x 0 m Sd tq t7 'd rt C H X0w F'W mow wrKow 0www wm wF40 9m a0 P- w H N n 0 m w p w p• K r K N rr X� OY. 0 X "C a rwr LQ to 4 (D m m "G m w m pX rt to N m rroP. F' r rt X K rt w w N -G m m w � w m to :"/ Y• ro pp K O o H %D w w N ,b'C ,b ro r r N P- x 0 rt P n to r m wK K t7 p o0 o p 7C w w :0, p p c r- t7 A rr m m rt r- rt r rn w0 0 wE N 0 K N- N CO tH N N O N a O w w N p- 10 mi a. N co n] OK n H. K w rr rt K Frot 0 •• -i :4'I " F 0 .. r t�f CL W . ro P- r ro N f� 0 d O LQ LQ ro 10•• G K t) m O K 0 O r G w w w 0 0 W 10K U K tJ K U K 0 m m M 0 0 p ro tYX r m w-- w w O w 0 0 0 0 0 w •• m 0 LQ 0 Kw 0 R+ Xrt P• r- Mul V " w m rt� p P. w � 0 w LQ p Kw W 0 Kp rt H -U K n m rt u O a •• H m •, aro rt p °p to P OfA W m P- ro P- P- 0 Nmp m r o w P o P•0 O F'- w rt y P o m r• p n 41 rr t7 p p 0 ro O 0 hI rt F'- P- 0 K P. ro W O rt ~ w K H t7z K n rr rr �O p rr �O N w O N O rt P•0 p m K p O w rt r- H 0 p d d m rt w Y- r m m 0 0 K D 7 m rr 'C N O Ul 0 O O IO 0 O 0 O O at O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Sd x1 N �H1 rd H N W W r P P O N O\ Ui H 0 N N N N N N N N N'Ya b w � ID W w w w %D koG O O O O1 O O m U%0) O m m H %D w O r r a w lP P O F' r lO OO m m 9 K m P rt •sauawnoop $ullllq juawasingwia.i aqa tptm papnlaut aq Iltm suopenlena asxnOD •stseq Xigauow B uo'xoaeutpxooa aptma1913 Sd0'uouut}laW uw.1e0 {]NV su'4uat AJxat{S oa paptnoxd aq Illm •aaa'paaaadsut saeas iea'paangl.tasip sletaaaew'pagoea.t siagwnu'platl sassela uo uotaewxotul •s.autexasax pllga jo uotaellmsui pue uon:)alas xado.id aqa xoj ssaua.lemn ailgnd asisa oa hatunaxoddo ue SE NaaM JOSUassed Pllq:) 1puopaN asn osle lllm logy •xeaX aqa 3notl2noaga suopeas axg ano jo auo ae Juana �oago Jeri aeo Alilauow a wnwtutw a ae ploq llim auawaaedap aatg uetpl.ioW;Dq j. -satauage ea.m woij lauuos.lad SW3 pue WU aa2JPj IItM asxnoo stq,l, •sau!laping as.inoa uetolutloay rUaJBS .198uassed p11L10 Pazlp.tepu'RIS MOWN s,VS,L14N 2ulzlllln as.lnoa uolaeaylaaaa r. gSno ttla suelatugoay ,�lajeS xaguassed pllga hatunwwoo legal aseaaaul lllm panlaaa.l spung 'SRIEV 1gn1'l8Q ,sdttisiauved Aalunwwoa put: sauanaaeas.taa Rucw ano g2noxga 6allvA axnseaJI aqa utgatm salllwej Spoau Sum asisse oa alge uaaq seq pue aeaA isel uolaeztue2.to anoX wo.tJ aue.tg apaS.taguassed pltq:) a pantaaaa auawaxedatl aiij. uetptaaW aq., -sloops 5utpueasano pue uopeaol le-1aua3 sat as anp ease leiluaplsa.l a.1oo s,rtallen aqa mou st ueipuaW -oq I )O aaeaS aqa ut aauis.tawt asaM/aseg xofew aqa si goigm.loptxJOJ V8-1 aaeasxaaul aqa Sall satxepunoq s,ueiptxaW utgatm'dlleuatatppb •saeas xaguassed pitga tplm dlaq Sut.ltnba t satpmq Auew a.tu gjmojS zega tp!M 'ogepi ui Mato guimoag asaasej aya aq oa sanupuoo uelppaW jo X10 atu :SN0lJ.b:)1911V(la •auawaaedaa aatg uuiptaalN jo hdlg atla3o jiegaq uo spunj ifutasanbax we l :Maggs aeap 00'006`Z$Jo aunowu aqa ut spunj aoj asanbag :get 6ZTT-LOL£8 al'astog 6ZTL xo8 'O'd ivawa.ledaa uopeaaodsue.l,l, ogepi haajes AemgslN Jo 0:)Wo 91OZ/8Z/11 sutalua( b.iagS sliewu epil autuy 18Lt4vd Al. UW 4 u�4 �sus� c ®A1T7 VIQI u8or LAIG)l -"unw uau"o qua pmW ep dumm.L xa eW SZZ0009-Z8=aagwnu C31/xe.L lejapa:l Z9£ IS -P 8ZO :SNnG 2,io•XjpuelppauapD.c.iod ZGSO-tl88-80Z 9TOZ/8Z/TT aad wed ( AID N VIQII13 W) '.LN3W3HH9V sin Cld,i.nnu dAdH S31IIIVd dH.L `dO3adH1. SONI M NI juDig n pap nmol! mollof of aa.i6v pun sainpaaoid pun sajarlod A' 7afuS.ta6uassnd pJrga s arJnpl pun�srapun pun pea r annrl J °spunk aopsanbw sixll jo uojaeaaplsuo3..moSaoj noS4uegl 00.006 `Z$ MflO3H.LAfVH9 7VLOL -sinoq.raaan.jsur 6u.tIODn tralmsaopw4su roof jofslasoa.iopwisul p$ urarp jad ajDj aln4s/sloam I :LSd,7 0$ 94D,1 aBDal w 0401s/a6Dal m I JSd,) '006',7$ $ sl asoa (5).403311.11sul.LSd3 7Z asinoo uor1wffigia.7 j,Sd.9 (palaad atp apidwoo of s7ivawaimbai fiuipunffoisy papp(7) �,L�04tlS pled aq jou lllM s31ep anoge aql jade ivauaas ingwla.i .xoj pa:nitugns saalanul *4sZ£ aagolao ueup aa4ei ou AjajeS AemgglH }o 33WO (Ili pue .ioaeulpaoo:) aplmale4S Sdj Aq Panlaaa.i aq asauI Ja jw lrM pue TgT—A* ' uaaAgag pawjoj.iad saalAJas ao panlaaa.t spooB aoJ saalonui 'tpD£ Ain[ uutp aalel ou AjajuS AemgSIH ;a 0:)WO Q.LI pue 1aIeulpJoo:) aplM03EIS SdJ Aq PanlaaaJ aq isnur'qioE aunj oa aopd jo uo pawaol.ead saalnaas .10 panlaaaJ spoon .10J saaronui Ile Sega pueas.iapun I (aaaa) ieu paaut.id) A..LddVS AVMHDIH dO 3:)IdiO'.LN3W.L-dVdgU NOIIVIIIOdSNVII.L OHVGI --X-ON S3h Zuapeztue'8.tO (E)(:))TOS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 10B PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Legal: To Consider an Approval Letter Required by the Public Finance Authority of Wisconsin for Taxable Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds for the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine (ICOM) MEETING NOTES rte✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ( �� E IDI AN --- June 20, 2017 To: Public Finance Authority c/o Wisconsin Counties Association 22 East Mifflin Street, Suite 900 Madison, Wisconsin 53703 RE: Public Finance Authority Taxable Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds (Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine Project) Series 2017 To Whom It May Concern: Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Joe Borton Luke Cavener Genesis Milam Ty Palmer Anne Little Roberts The Public Finance Authority ("Authority") proposes to issue not to exceed $55,000,000 principal amount of its revenue Bonds captioned above (the "Bonds") to finance or refinance certain costs in connection with the Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine project for Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC (the "Borrower") to be located entirely within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho (the "Project"). This letter shall constitute approval by the City of Meridian, of such financing of the Project by the Authority for purposes of Section 66.0304(11)(a) of the Wisconsin Statutes. The undersigned certifies that she is the highest ranking executive or administrator of the City of Meridian. This approval does not constitute an endorsement of the Project. This letter may be produced as evidence, and shall be conclusive proof, of the approval granted herein in connection with any proceedings relating to the issuance of the Bonds and may be relied upon any party thereto in connection therewith. Sincerely, Tammy do,,Weerd Mayor Office of the Mayor . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-4433 . Fax 208-884-8119 . www.meridiancity.org POLICY RELATING TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT APPROVAL FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS April 6, 2016 This POLICY RELATING TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT APPROVAL FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (“Policy”) is adopted by the Board of Directors of the Authority (“Board”) effective as of the date stated above. BACKGROUND Wisconsin Statutes Section 66.0304(11)(a) imposes the following requirement (“Local Ap- proval Requirement”) with respect to Bonds issued by the Authority: “A commission may not issue bonds to finance a capital improvement project in any state or territory of the United States unless a political subdivision within whose boundaries the project is to be located has approved the financing of the project. A commission may not issue bonds to finance a capital improvement project in this state unless all of the political subdivisions within whose boundaries the project is to be lo- cated has approved the financing of the project.” Section 4 of the Amended and Restated Joint Exercise Agreement Relating to the Public Finance Authority dated September 28, 2010 (the “Joint Exercise Agreement”) contains a sub- stantially identical requirement: “[t]he Commission shall not issue Bonds to finance any capital improvement pro- ject unless one or more political subdivisions ("Approving Agency"), within whose boundaries the project is to be located, as and to the extent required by the Joint Exercise of Powers Law, shall have approved the financing of the project. Such approval may be evidenced by resolution, certificate, order, report or such other means of written approval as may be selected by the Approving Agency. No such approval shall be required in connection with Bonds that are issued to refund Bonds previously issued.” REASONS FOR POLICY The term “capital improvement project” is not defined in either Section 66.0304 or in the Joint Exercise Agreement. The absence of a precise definition has the potential of resulting in 26399381_3.DOCX uncertainty and confusion and inconsistent application of the Local Approval Requirement, all of which the Board believes can be detrimental to and undermine the Authority’s public purposes as contemplated by Section 66.0304 and by the Joint Exercise Agreement. Further, Program Staff advises the Board that attempts to obtain local approval are often frustrated by the reluctance (and occasional refusal) of local government officials outside Wisconsin to commit in writing to approve a financing by a Wisconsin agency with which they are unfamiliar under a Wisconsin law with which they are unfamiliar, as well as and in addition to the frequently-expressed con- cern that by giving such approval the local government will become liable on the Bonds. The Board believes that to the extent the inability to obtain local approval results from such factors that are or appear to be unrelated to the project itself, it similarly has the potential of undermin- ing the Authority’s public purposes. This Policy is intended to address the concerns expressed above by establishing a definition of “capital improvement project” that can be universally and consistently applied to all future financings by the Authority. Further, the Authority was established by local governments, primarily for local govern- ments, for the public purpose of providing local governments a means to efficiently, and reliably finance projects that benefit local governments and nonprofit organizations and other eligible private borrowers in the State of Wisconsin and throughout the country. In light of the forego- ing, the Board may determine that, notwithstanding that a project being financed is excluded from the definition of “capital improvement project,” local approval of the financing by the Au- thority is appropriate as a matter of Board policy. POLICY Local approval as prescribed by Wisconsin Statutes Section 66.0304(11)(a) and Section 4 of the Joint Exercise Agreement will be required for all Authority tax-exempt or taxable bond issues that finance or refinance the acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of real property un- less two tests are met: FIRST, the project must fall outside the definition of “capital improve- ment project” articulated below, and SECOND, the Board must determine as a matter of policy that not obtaining local approval does not frustrate or undermine the public purposes for which the Authority was established. Test 1: Definition A project is a “capital improvement project” if the proceeds of tax-exempt or taxable Bonds issued by the Authority are used by a participant, in whole or in part, to finance the acqui- sition of real property (a “Facility,” which term shall include land, buildings and other structures, and permanent fixtures appurtenant thereto) or to refinance outstanding indebtedness previously used to acquire, construct or rehabilitate a Facility already owned by the participant, or which indebtedness is secured by such Facility, unless all of the following are true: a. No portion of the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to pay the costs of the construc- tion, demolition, expansion, rehabilitation, renovation, upgrading, addition to or re- modeling of the Facility being acquired or refinanced (“Disqualifying Costs”); and 26399381_3.DOCX b. No portion of the proceeds of the Bonds will “replace” other funds of the participant that have previously been earmarked or set aside to pay Disqualifying Costs, includ- ing, without limitation (i) indirectly financing Disqualifying Costs incurred by the seller of a Facility as a condition to or otherwise in connection with sale of the Facili- ty to the participant and built into the purchase price, and (ii) refinancing one or more outstanding loans that were (A) incurred within one year prior to (or, if earlier, in an- ticipation of) the Authority issuing Bonds to refinance such loans, and (B) the pro- ceeds of which loans were used to pay Disqualifying Costs. Test 2: Board Policy Even if a project is not a “capital improvement project” as defined above, local approval as prescribed by Wisconsin Statutes Section 66.0304(11)(a) and Section 4 of the Joint Exercise Agreement will be required if the Board determines that local approval is appropriate, taking into consideration the impact of the financing on the local community based on any factors the Board may deem appropriate to consider in making such determination. Such factors might include (by way of illustration and not limitation) the continuity of ownership, management or operation of the project; whether approval of the Facility by a local political subdivision was obtained for any other purpose at an earlier date; the level of state or local regulation or licensing of the Facility or the ownership or management thereof; the quality, experience and reputation of the owner, man- ager or operator of the Facility; and whether there is any evidence of material complaints, legal violations or problems in the local community with the Facility or its owner, manager or opera- tor. APPLICABILITY AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Nothing in this Policy shall prohibit a participant from seeking and obtaining local approval although not required under this Policy. Before the Authority issues Bonds it shall require that the facts demonstrating to its satis- faction that the project is not a “capital improvement project” and that support the Board’s de- terminations under the Board Policy test articulated above be certified to by the applicable partic- ipant or participants through its or their representations and warranties set forth in the Bond doc- umentation. This Policy may be amended, supplemented or revoked by the Board at any time. The in- terpretation of this Policy is within the Board’s sole and exclusive discretion and any determina- tion by the Board in respect thereof shall be final, binding and conclusive. The Authority shall have no pecuniary liability for any costs, losses or damages arising out of any person’s reliance on this Policy or the Board interpretation or application thereof. This Policy shall be superseded by any provisions of applicable law inconsistent herewith. S-1 SUMMARY STATEMENT Bonds: The Public Finance Authority Taxable Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds (Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine Project) Series 2017, in the total principal amount of $50,000,000 (the “Bonds”) are being issued by the Public Finance Authority (the “Authority”) pursuant to Section 66.0304 of the Wisconsin Statutes (the “Act”), a Joint Exercise Agreement executed by certain Wisconsin political subdivisions, an authorizing resolution of the Authority and an Indenture of Trust, dated as of August 1, 2017 (the “Indenture”), between the Authority and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The Bonds are being issued and delivered in fully registered form and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the registered owner and nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”). The Bonds are being issued in Book-Entry Form. Interest: Interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing on February 1, 2018. Principal: Principal of the Bonds is payable on August 1, 2023, the maturity date of the Bonds. Redemption: The Bonds are subject to extraordinary, optional and mandatory redemption in the manner and under the circumstances described in the Indenture. The Authority: Pursuant to the Act and Section 66.0304 to the Wisconsin Statutes, the Authority is a unit of government and a body corporate and politic separate and distinct from, and independent of, the State of Wisconsin and the Authority Members. The Authority was established by local governments, primarily for local governments, for the public purpose of providing local governments a means to efficiently and reliably finance projects that benefit local gov ernments and nonprofit organizations, and other eligible private borrowers in the State of Wisconsin and throughout the country. The Company: The Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, LLC (the “Company”) is a single-purpose limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Idaho for the purposes of owning and operating a college of osteopathic medicine (the “College”). The Project: Proceeds of the Bonds will be loaned by the Authority to the Company pursuant to a Loan Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2017, between the Authority and the Company (the “Loan Agreement”), and applied, together with other available moneys, (i) to finance the cost s of acquiring, constructing and equipping a facility (the “Facility”) for the operation of a college of osteopathic medicine (the “College”); (ii) to fund the Debt Service Reserve Fund established pursuant to the Indenture; (iii) to fund a portion of capitalized interest with respect to the Bonds; and (iv) to pay certain costs of issuance (collectively, the “Project”). Certain funds of the Company have been or shall be (i) applied to pay certain costs of issuance; (ii) applied to satisfy working capital requirements for the College; (iii) applied to fund a portion of capitalized interest with respect to the Bonds; (iv) applied to fund an operating reserve fund (the “Operating Reserve Account”) as required by the American Osteopathic Association’s Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation (“COCA”); and (v) deposited into an escrow account (the “Teach-Out Reserve Account”) as required by COCA and the Idaho State Board o f Education (the “SBOE”), pursuant to a Four-Party Account Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2017 (the “Escrow Agreement”), by and between the Company, the SBOE, Southwest Capital Bank (the “Depository”) and COCA Holders of the Bonds shall have no interest in the Operating Reserve Account or the Teach-Out Reserve Account or funds on deposit therein (other than investment income from the accounts), which must remain unencumbered in accordance with  Preliminary; subject to change S-2 the requirements of COCA and the SBOE, until released. The Facility will be located on property (the “Project Site”) within the ISU-Meridian Health Science Center of Idaho State University (“ISU”) in Meridian, Idaho, leased from ISU pursuant to a Ground Lease, by and between the Company, the SBOE and ISU. ISU is a doctoral research and teaching institution founded in 1901. At the main campus in Pocatello, and at locations in Meridian, Idaho Falls and Twin Falls, ISU offers access to more than 250 programs. Over 14,000 students attend ISU. Idaho State University is the state's designated lead institution in health professions. The ISU-Meridian Health Science Center, which spans four acres, houses nine distance -learning classrooms; the L.S. Skaggs Pharmacy Complex; Counseling and Speech and Language clinics; and human patient simulation and clinical/medical science laboratories. The Delta Dental of Idaho Dental Residency Clinic, which opened in 2011, provides advanced training for dentists and treatment for underserved patients. The College will be a privately-funded, fully-accredited college of medicine. The mission of the College is to provide a critically-needed solution to acute physician shortages in Idaho and the contiguous Rocky Mountain States’ region: Montana, Wyoming, South Dakota, and North Dakota. The College is not part of Idaho State University. The Facility is planned as a three-story building with an area of approximately 90,000 square feet located on the Project Site. In accordance with a Collabor ative Affiliation Agreement (the “Affiliation Agreement”) between the Company and ISU, ISU will provide certain services with respect to the College, including access to information technology and computer labs, library services, health center and fitness center access and emergency notifications, all of which are to be operating expenses of the College. The stated purpose of the Affiliation Agreement is to allow ISU to facilitate and advance its health science mission, core themes and strategic plans, and to assist the Company in its mission to establish a private College of Osteopathic Medicine on the University’s Meridian Campus. Operation of a college of osteopathic medicine in the United States requires accreditation from COCA, which is designated by the U.S. Department of Education to accredit institutions granting the osteopathic degree. The requirements for pre-accreditation include funding of sufficient escrows to provide for operation of the College until graduation of the first class of students. Funds deposited into the Escrow Account are intended to satisfy that requirement. Security: In the Loan Agreement, the Company has agreed to repay amounts in installments which will be sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, and to fund and replenish various funds established under the Indenture. The Authority has assigned all of its right, title and interest under and pursuant to the Loan Agreement (except for its rights to receive certain payments relating to indemnification and attorneys’ fees and expenses and to receive notices thereunder) to the Trustee to secure payment of the Bonds. To secure its obligations under the Loan Agreement, the Company will execute a Leasehold Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Fixture Filing (the “Deed of Trust”) for the benefit of the Trustee, encumbering the Facility and other property interest of the Company and the leasehold interests of the Company in the Project Site. There has been established with the Trustee the Debt Service Reserve Fund with respect to the Bonds. There will initially be deposited in the Debt Service Reserve Fund from proceeds of the Bonds an amount equal to the Debt Service Reserve Fund Requirement, preliminarily estimated at $2,500,000. If there are insufficient funds in the Bond Fund created p ursuant to the Indenture, the Trustee will transfer from the Debt Service Reserve Fund to the Bond Fund amounts necessary to make such payment of principal or interest on the day on which such payment is due.  Preliminary, subject to change S-3 Neither the Authority nor any Authority Member or Sponsor, nor any political subdivision or agency of the State of Wisconsin, will be obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon except from funds held by the Trustee under the Indenture, and neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the State of Wisconsin or any political subdivision or agency thereof is pledged to the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds. The Authority has no taxing power. The Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine at Idaho State University is a free-standing, privately funded, separately licensed and accredited and independently operated entity and is not part of Idaho State University. Idaho law prohibits ISU from using public funds to support a private college such as the College. The Bonds are offered in a transaction not involving a public offering to sophisticated investors who, in making their investment decision, rely solely on the financial viability of the Project. The Company has been organized specifically for the purpose of establishing and operating the College, and no source of revenue is anticipated for the Company beyond student tuition and operating income of the College. No guaranty of payment of the Bonds will be made by any member of the Company or any entity affiliated with the Company. Each initial purchaser must execute an investor letter. The issuance of the Bonds does not obligate, directly, indirectly or contingently, the State of Wisconsin or any political subdivision thereof to levy any taxes or appropriate or expend any funds for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 11 A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: 1-7_ /-7 7% Ordinance No.: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1- 3(C) (1), SPECIFYING EXCEPTIONS TO GENERAL USE ZONE AMENITIES STANDARDS; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(D)(3), ALLOWING BARRIERS TO BE AFFIXED TO SIDEWALKS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. MEETING NOTES K APPROFED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17- / 7 3Y BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, MILAM, PALMER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(C)(1), SPECIFYING EXCEPTIONS TO GENERAL USE ZONE AMENITIES STANDARDS; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(D)(3), ALLOWING BARRIERS TO BE AFFIXED TO SIDEWALKS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Meridian's Use Zone Encroachment Permit provides a process by which the City regulates the size, placement, operation, and maintenance of structures and objects placed in the Use Zone of the sidewalks in the downtown Meridian area, in accordance with the terms and provisions of its August 7, 2012 license agreement with Ada County Highway District; and WHEREAS, the changes to Meridian City Code set forth herein are intended to improve the processes and standards established for barriers delineating outdoor alcohol service areas and dining areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: Section 1. That Meridian City Code section 8-1-3(C)(1) is hereby amended to read as follows. C. General Use Zone Standards: The following standards shall apply to encroachments in the use zone, and/or to the placement thereof. 1. Amenities Movable: Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this chapter: a. All amenities placed in the use zone shall be nonpermanent, movable, and freestanding. b. Exeept as etheRvise s}gee-i€cally set fertliin this ehaptef, amenities Amenities may not be secured or fastened to streetscape improvements, buildings, or the sidewalk. It shall be unlawful for any person to permanently attach or affix any amenity in the use zone. Section 2. That Meridian City Code section 8-1-3(D)(3) is hereby amended to read as follows. D. Use Zone Amenities Allowed With Encroachment Permit: The following amenities may be allowed in the use zone under a valid city of Meridian use zone encroachment permit and subject to all applicable standards as set forth herein: 3. Barriers that are used to delineate outdoor dining areas or alcohol service areas, so long as such barriers meet all of the following standards: a. Barriers shall be comprised of black, wrought iron, sectional fencing, between thirty six (36) and forty eight inches (48") in height. b. Barriers shall accommodate access by disabled persons as required by law. c. Barriers shall not impede, or encroach into the path of, any points of building ingress or egress. UPDATING USE ZONE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR BARRIERS PAGE I OF 3 d. Nonterminal section breaks of barriers shall be connected, unless incorporating planters or other container landscaping as set forth above. e. With specific approval by the Director, barriers may be permanently attached or affixed to streetscape improvements, buildings or the sidewalk in the use zone The Director may specify, as conditions of such approval: (1) The manner by which the barriers may be attached to the streetscape improvements buildings, or the sidewalk in the use zone; (2) A requirement that the applicant repair or replace the sidewalk following removal of the barriers. - (3) A requirement that the applicant provide a warranty surety, with the Cfty as the named beneficiary, in an amount equal to the estimated cost of replacing the sidewalk segments in which the barriers are installed which warranty surety shall be in effect for one (1) year following the installation of the Encroachment Permit; and/or (4) Any other conditions deemed necessary or appropriate to protect public safety, welfare, or interest. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, on June, 2017. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, on June, 2017. APPROVED: Tammy d^Vd, Mayor tPTED AGC,�S T ,,r Cily or w E IDIAN IDAHO SEAL �I ATTEST: C Col&J City Clerk UPDATING USE ZONE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR BARRIERS PAGE 2 OF 3 NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17 J-7"3 V - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(C)(1), SPECIFYING EXCEPTIONS TO GENERAL USE ZONE AMENITIES STANDARDS; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(D)(3), ALLOWING BARRIERS TO BE AFFIXED TO SIDEWALKS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. �aptEDAUGj�- r\ 0 w CitytfMer@ian pffi- IDIAN*-- Mayor and City Council IDAHO By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk s� SEAL First Reading: �-�� yr�ROjthe TREPSv�� Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-902: YES ✓ NO Second Reading: Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 17 - The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance no. 17- Vof the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A(3). DATED this day of A-'(- 17. L, 1j /. William. L.M. Nary City Attorney UPDATING USE ZONE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR BARRIERS PAGE 3 OF 3 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-056856 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 06/22/2017 08:08 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. /1 /7 3', 15 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS AN ORDINANCE (H-2016-0027 MAVERM FOR ANNEXATION FOR PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LANDS FROM C-2 TO C -G (GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" are within the corporate lunits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re -zoning by the owner of said property, to -wit: Russel S. Barger, SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re -zoned from C-2 to C -G (General Retail and Service Commercial District) in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re -zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. ANNEXATION — MAVERIK (H 2016-0027) Page 1 of 3 SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in fall force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Cleric of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a snap prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings bytitle and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this c) day of -&uple , 2017. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this c day of , U.Ne , 2017. ATTEST: C.JAY COMES. CITY CLERK MAY de WEERD O�QOP EU AUG W( iii of w E ®DAAANT ? Itloj \� SEAL ANNEXATION — MAVERIK (H 2016-0027) Page 2 of 3 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss: County of Ada ) On this day of 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY de WEERD and C.JAY COLES, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. O ©�- •. (SEAL) No,�; `.4: a ®• lb • 4$O oa ••0.®®®00° MAahjk L- -�fiq NOTARY PUBLI FOR IDAHO ED AT: d MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: � -) SS ANNEXATION — MAVERIK (H 2016-0027) Page 3 of 3 Solutions You Can Build On Civil Engineering  Land Planning  Structural Engineering  Landscape Architecture  Land Surveying  Construction Surveying 5160 South 1500 West  Riverdale, Utah 84405  Tel: 801-621-3100  Fax: 801-621-2666 ogden@reeve-assoc.com  reeve-assoc.com 3-27-17 MERIDIAN, IDAHO LEGAL DESCRIPTION PART OF NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, U.S. SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 60.20 FEET AND WEST 48.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD THE FOLLOWING (2) TWO COURSES: (1) SOUTH 240.79 FEET AND (2) THENCE S00°38'30"E 443.33 FEET; THENCE N37°48'51"W 312.79 FEET; THENCE N55°47'51"W 117.23 FEET; THENCE S84°17'21"W 48.98 FEET; THENCE N00°00'15"E 326.80 FEET; THENCE N21°56'21"E 80.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: (1) N89°34'29"E 28.09 FEET AND (2) S88°46'30"E 253.48 FEET; THENCE S46°17'39"E 29.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 168,903 SQUARE FEET OR 3.877 ACRES EXHIBIT A B NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17 - PROVIDING FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE An Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting annexation and zoning for part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise, Ada County, Idaho. This parcel contains 3.877 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is SUBJECT TO all easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. As surveyed in attached exhibit "B" and is not based on an actual field survey. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East ,Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the day of€ , 2017. of M6fidi Mayor and City Council By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk First Reading: �� C�'` �-,� - Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code §50-902: YES- NO Second Reading: Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 17- } The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance No. 17- 17, � 213of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3). DATED this )j day of .%'� , 2017. Wi liam. L.M. Wary City Attorney ORDINANCE SUMMARY - MAVERIK (111-2016-0027) Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 12 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Future Meeting Topics MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 20, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 13 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(b): To consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against, a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent and 74-206(f): To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation, or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated. MEETING NOTES -r ,Pft) e atr e 10. 5> Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS     …helping organizations make better decisions since 1982  Submitted to the City of Meridian, Idaho  ETC Institute  725 W. Frontier Lane,  Olathe, Kansas   66061  June 2017  City of Meridian  Citizen Survey   Findings Report  Contents  Executive Summary ....................................................................... i  Section 1: Charts and Graphs ....................................................... 1  Section 2: Importance‐Satisfaction Analysis .............................. 33  Section 3: Benchmarking Analysis .............................................. 39   Section 4: Tabular Data .............................................................. 46   Section 5: Survey Instrument ..................................................... 93  E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   2017 City of Meridian Community Survey  Executive Summary  Purpose and Methodology  ETC Institute administered a survey to residents of the City of Meridian during the spring of 2017.  The purpose of the survey was to help the City of Meridian focus planning and budget decisions  pertaining to the delivery and quality of services provided. The findings of this survey will help the  City better understand citizen use of an satisfaction with City services, programs, and citizen  impressions about the performance of the City as a whole.   The seven‐page survey, cover letter and postage paid return envelope were mailed to a random  sample of households in the City of Meridian. The cover letter explained the purpose of the survey  and encouraged residents to either return their survey by mail or complete the survey online. At  the end of the online survey, residents were asked to enter their home address, this was done to  ensure that only responses from residents who were part of the random sample were included in  the final survey database.   Ten days after the surveys were mailed, ETC Institute sent emails and placed phone calls to the  households that received the survey to encourage participation. The emails contained a link to the  on‐line version of the survey to make it easy for residents to complete the survey. To prevent  people who were not residents of Meridian from participating, everyone who completed the  survey on‐line was required to enter their home address prior to submitting the survey. ETC  Institute then matched the addresses that were entered on‐line with the addresses that were  originally selected for the random sample. If the address from a survey completed on‐line did not  match one of the addresses selected for the sample, the on‐line survey was not counted. The goal  was to obtain completed surveys from at least 500 residents. The goal was exceeded with a total of  743 residents completing the survey. The overall results for the sample of 523 households have a  precision of at least +/‐3.6% at the 95% level of confidence.   This report contains:  An executive summary of the methodology for administering the survey and major findings, charts showing the overall results for most questions on the survey and trend data from the 2014 community survey, importance‐satisfaction analysis; this analysis was done to determine priority actions for the City to address based upon the survey results, benchmarking data that shows how the results for Meridian compare to other communities, tables that show the results of the random sample for each question on the survey, a copy of the survey instrument. Page i E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   In order to better  understand how well  services are being delivered  by the City, ETC Institute  geocoded the home address  of respondents to the  survey. The map to the right  shows the physical  distribution of survey  respondents based on the  location of their home.   The percentage of “don’t  know” responses has been  excluded from many of the  graphs shown in this report  to facilitate valid  comparisons of the results  from Meridian with the  results from other  communities in ETC  Institute’s DirectionFinder®  database. Since the number  of “don’t know” responses  often reflects the utilization  and awareness of city  services, the percentage of  “don’t know” responses has  been provided in the tabular  data section of this report. When the “don’t know” responses have been excluded, the text of this  report will indicate that the responses have been excluded with the phrase “who had an opinion.”  Overall Perceptions of the City  Respondents from the City of Meridian were asked to rate items that may influence perceptions of  the City. They were asked to use a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Excellent” and 0 means  “Poor”. Ninety‐three percent (93%) of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated the  City as a place to raise a family exceeds their expectations (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale).   Ninety‐one percent (91%) of those surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that the City as a  place to live exceeds their expectations (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale). Only one item,  providing mobility options other than driving, saw a significant number of respondents indicate  their expectations were not met. The City of Meridian saw an increase in the number of  respondents whose expectations were exceeded in 11 of the 14 items that were rated compared  to the 2014 survey results.   Page ii E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   Overall Quality of Life in the City   Overall, 85% of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that the overall quality of life in  the City exceeds their expectations (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale). Seventy‐nine percent  (79%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that the overall quality of City services  is exceeding their expectations (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale). The number of respondents  whose expectations were exceeded remained consistent with the 2014 survey results.   Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees  Overall, 72% of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, feel they are getting their money’s worth  for the value they receive from City tax dollars and fees (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale). This  is the same percentage of respondents who feel they are getting their money’s worth in 2014. The  City of Meridian continues to ensure residents can see the benefit of their City tax dollars and fees.  The charts below show how the 2014 responses compare to those in 2017.    Overall Quality of Services Provided by the City  The major categories of City services that had the highest levels of satisfaction, based upon the  combined percentage of 7 to 10 ratings on a 10‐point scale among residents who had an opinion,  were: the quality of fire and rescue services (94%), City parks (89%), garbage and trash pick‐up  services (86%), and police department and law enforcement (85%). For 10 of the 11 major  Page iii E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   categories of City services that were rated, 50% or more of residents who had an opinion were  “very satisfied” or “satisfied”, City leaders have done a great job of ensuring overall satisfaction  among residents is very high. The City of Meridian saw an increase in overall satisfaction (rating of  7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale) in 12 of the 14 areas assessed from the 2014 survey results. Based on  the sum of respondent’s top three choices, the three items that residents feel should receive the  most emphasis from City leaders over the next two years are: planning and zoning services, police  department and law enforcement, and City parks.   Parks and Recreation Services  Ninety‐two percent (93%) of respondents, who had an opinion, rated the overall quality,  appearance, and maintenance of City parks as either “excellent” or “good” (7 to 10 ratings on a 10‐ point scale). Other parks and recreation services that residents rated as “excellent” or “good”  include: the quality of athletic fields (88%), the number of City parks (85%), and the quality of youth  sports programs (76%). The number of pathways for walking and biking was the only item that a  majority of respondents did not rate as “excellent” or “good” ” (7 to 10 ratings on a 10‐point scale).  During the past 12 months, 9% of households had at least one member visit a City park and 81% of  respondents have personally visited a city park, only 10% of respondents indicated nobody in their  household has visited a City of Meridian Park.   Page iv E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   City Communication Services  Eighty percent (80%) of respondents, who had an opinion, rated the usefulness of online services  on the City website as either “excellent” or “good” (7 to 10 ratings on a 10‐point scale). Other city  communication services that residents rated as “excellent” or “good” include: the quality of  www.meridiancity.org (74%), and information about city programs and services (72%).   Forty‐nine percent (49%) of residents indicated they currently get information about Meridian’s  services and programs from flyers in utility bills. The other most used information sources include:  the city website (48%), television/news (47%), and social media (47%).    If the City were to expand to another communication platform 32% would prefer to receive  information about Meridian’s services and programs from mobile applications, and 16% would  prefer to receive information via text message.   Ratings of Public Safety Services  Ninety‐one percent (91%) of residents surveyed who had an opinion, rated their overall feeling of  safety in the City of Meridian as either “excellent” or “good” (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale).  Other public safety services that residents rated as “excellent” or “good” include: fire response  time to emergencies (94%), emergency medical services (EMS) (94%), the overall quality of local  fire protections (94%), the location of fire stations (90%), and the professionalism of emergency  responders (89%). Residents are generally more satisfied with all aspects of public safety services  than they were in 2014.   Page v E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   Additional Findings  Agreement with Various Statements About the City of Meridian. Eighty‐five percent (81%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated they either “strongly agree” or “agree” that access to quality shopping and entertainment exist in the City of Meridian (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale). Other statements about the City with the same level of agreement include: quality of housing and a variety of options exist (74%) and development in Meridian enhances the quality of life (73%). The lowest level of agreement among residents surveyed, who had an opinion, concerns how wisely the City is managing growth. Ratings of Services Provided by Other Agency Partners. Eighty‐four percent (84%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated the library services provided by the Meridian Library District as either “excellent” or “good” (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale). Other services provided that residents rated as “excellent” or “good” include: cemetery services offered by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance (82%), programs for seniors at the Meridian Senior Center (74%), and elections by the Ada County clerk (73%). Ratings of Road‐Related Projects. Eighty‐eight percent (88%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated roadway widening as a “high priority” (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale). Other road‐related projects that residents rated as a “high priority” include: intersection improvements (81%) and pathway or sidewalk connections on local streets (74%). Based on the sum of respondent’s top three choices, the two transportation improvements that residents feel should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next two years are: roadway widening and intersection improvements. Enforcement of City Codes and Ordinances. Eighty‐one percent (81%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated the removal of graffiti as either “excellent” or “good” (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale). Other enforcement of codes and ordinances that residents rates as “excellent” or good” include: illegal dumping (66%), removal of abandoned or junk automobiles (65%), and weed abatement (53%). Nightlife and Entertainment Options. Eighty‐nine percent (89%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated restaurants would be an “excellent” or “good” (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale) nightlife and entertainment option that could positively contribute to a vibrant downtown. Other options that residents indicated would be an “excellent” or “good” nightlife and entertainment option that could positively contribute to a vibrant downtown include: live music venues (74%), performance art (73%), and movie theater (70%). Residents believe that restaurants and live music venues should receive the most attention from the City over the next three years. Support of Bond Initiatives for Various Items. Residents were informed that the City of Meridian has taken the position to save money for future improvements and not use bonds Page vi E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   for new facilities. The proposed bond measure would be for $10 million and could cost  homeowners approximately .91 cents per month for a home with an assessed value of  $100,000. They were then asked to indicated if they would support a new bond for various  items. Fifty‐nine percent (59%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated it was  “highly likely” or “likely” (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐point scale) that they would support a  bond for constructing a Linder Road Overpass. Other items residents indicated they would  be “highly likely” or “likely” to support include: adding more bike lanes and pathways (59%)  and providing more public transportation options (57%). The item that received the lowest  level of support was building a multipurpose center.     Importance of Community Issues. Ninety‐six percent (96%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, roads, traffic and transportation as a “high priority” (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10‐ point scale). Other community issues that residents rated as a “high priority” include: education and schools (90%) and jobs and economic development (85%). Based on the sum of respondent’s top three choices, the three community issues that residents feel should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next three years are: roads, traffic, and transportation, education and schools, and growth and development. Page vii E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   How the City of Meridian Compares to Other Communities Nationally  Satisfaction ratings for The City of Meridian rated the same as or above the U.S. average in 42 of  the 46 areas that were assessed. The City of Meridian rated significantly higher than the U.S.  average (difference of 5% or more) in 39 of these areas. Listed below are the comparisons  between the City of Meridian and the U.S. average:  Service Meridian U.S. Difference Category Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District 73%35%38%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Overall value received for City taxes/fees 72%38%34%Quality of Life Customer service from City employees 80%47%33%Quality of Life Overall quality of City services provided 79%49%30%Quality of Life Public involvement in local decision making 60%34%26%Communication As a place to raise a family 93%68%25%Perceptions Police safety education programs 78%54%24%Public Safety Quality of athletic fields 88%65%23%Parks and Recreation Services How quickly police respond to emergencies 88%65%23%Public Safety Effectiveness of City communications w/ the public 70%47%23%Communication Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks 93%70%23%Parks and Recreation Services As a place to live 92%70%22%Perceptions Overall feeling of safety in City 91%69%22%Public Safety Recreation programs 80%60%20%Overall City Services As a place to w ork 74%54%20%Perceptions Quality of local police protection 89%70%19%Public Safety Usefulness of online services on City website 80%62%18%Communication Abandoned/junk automobile removal 65%48%17%Code Enforcement Number of City parks 85%68%17%Parks and Recreation Services Garbage/trash pick‐up services 86%69%17%Overall City Services The  City is moving in the right direction 69%53%16%Quality of Life Water services 79%63%16%Overall  City Services Quality of youth sports p rograms 76%60%16%Parks and Recreation Services Fire safety education programs 81%65%16%Public Safety Sewer services 81%66%15%Overall  City Services Code enforcement 67%52%15%Overall City Services Lakeview Golf  Course 60%45%15%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Quality of Emergency Medical  Services (EMS)94%80%14%Public Safety Weed abatement 53%41%12%Code Enforcement Overall quality of life in City 85%73%12%Quality of Life Fire/rescue services 94%83%11%Overall City Services Overall quality of Fire Department 94%83%11%Public Safety Clean‐up of litter & debris on private property 52%41%11%Code Enforcement How quickly Fire Department respond to emergencies 94%84%10%Public Safety Library services by Meridian  Library District 84%74%10%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Planning for future growth & development 62%53%9%Perceptions Recycling services 76%69%7%Overall City Services K‐12 education by West Ada School District 62%56%6%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Traffic enforcement 69%64%5%Overall  City Services Animal control 61%58%3%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events 57%54%3%Parks and Recreation Services Visibility of police in neighborhoods 62%59%3%Public Safety Quality of pathways for walking & biking 57%59%‐2%Parks and Recreation Services All City roads operated by Ada County Highway District 41% 50%‐9%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Number of pathways for walking & biking 47% 63%‐16%Parks and Recreation Services Public transportation services 26% 43%‐17%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Page viii E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   How the City of Meridian Compares to Other Communities Regionally  Satisfaction ratings for The City of Meridian rated the same or above the average for the  Mountain Region in 43 of the 46 areas that were assessed. The City of Meridian rated  significantly higher than this average (difference of 5% or more) in 40 of these areas. Listed  below are the comparisons between The City of Meridian and the average for the Mountain  Region of the United States.   Service Meridian Mountain Region Difference Category Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District 73%32%41%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners As a place to raise  a family 93%62%31%Perceptions Overall value received for City taxes/fees 72%41%31%Quality of Life Police safety education programs 78%48%30%Public Safety Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks 93%63%30%Parks and Recreation Services As a place to live 92%64%28%Perceptions How  quickly police respond to e mergencies 88%60%28%Public Safety Customer service from City employees 80%52%28%Quality of Life As a place to work 74%46%28%Perceptions Overall quality of City services provided 79%54%25%Quality of Life Public involvement in local decision making 60%36%24%Communication Usefulness of online services on City website 80%56%24%Communication Quality of athletic fields 88%64%24%Parks and Recreation Services Number of City parks 85%62%23%Parks and Recreation Services Overall feeling of safety in City 91%70%21%Public Safety Recreation programs 80%60%20%Overall City Services Effectiveness of City communications w/ the public 70%50%20%Communication Quality of youth sports programs 76%56%20%Parks and Recreation Services Clean‐up of litter & debris on private property 52%34%18%Code Enforcement Code enforcement 67%50%17%Overall City Services Lakeview Golf  Course 60%43%17%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Fire safety education programs 81%64%17%Public Safety Weed abatement 53%37%16%Code Enforcement The  City is moving in the right direction 69%53%16%Quality of Life Recycling services 76%60%16%Overall City Services Quality of local police protection 89%74%15%Public Safety Abandoned/junk automobile  removal 65%51%14%Code Enforcement Library services by Meridian  Library District 84%70%14%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Garbage/trash pick‐up services 86%73%13%Overall City Services Fire/rescue services 94%82%12%Overall City Services Overall quality of Fire Department 94%82%12%Public Safety How quickly Fire Department respond to emergencies 94%84%10%Public Safety Overall quality of life in City 85%75%10%Quality of Life Planning for future growth & development 62%53%9%Perceptions Water services 79%70%9%Overall City Services Quality of Emergency Medical  Services (EMS)94%85%9%Public Safety Visibility of police in neighborhoods 62%53%9%Public Safety Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events 57%50%7%Parks and Recreation Services Sewer services 81%75%6%Overall City Services Traffic enforcement 69%64%5%Overall City Services Animal control 61%58%3%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners K‐12 education by West Ada School District 62%61%1%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Quality of pathways for walking & biking 57%57%0%Parks and Recreation Services All City roads operated by Ada County Hi ghway District 41%49%‐8%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Number of pathways for walking & biking 47%59%‐12%Parks and Recreation Services Public transportation services 26%49%‐23%Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Page ix E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   Investment Priorities  Recommended Priorities for the Next Two Years. In order to help the City identify investment  priorities for the next two years, ETC Institute conducted an Importance‐Satisfaction (I‐S) analysis.  This analysis examined the importance residents placed on each City service and the level of  satisfaction with each service. By identifying services of high importance and low satisfaction, the  analysis identified which services will have the most impact on overall satisfaction with City services  over the next two years. If the City wants to improve its overall satisfaction rating, the City should  prioritize investments in services with the highest Importance Satisfaction (I‐S) ratings. Details  regarding the methodology for the analysis are provided in the Section 2 of this report.   Overall Priorities for the City by Major Category. This analysis reviewed the importance of and  satisfaction with major categories of City services. This analysis was conducted to help set the  overall priorities for the City. Based on the results of this analysis, the major services that are  recommended as the top priorities for investment over the next two years in order to raise the  City’s overall satisfaction rating are listed below:   o Planning and zoning services (IS Rating=0. 1918) The table below shows the importance‐satisfaction rating for all 16 major categories of City services  that were rated.  2017 Importance-Satisfaction Rating City of Meridian Major Categories of City Services Category of Service Most Important % Most Important Rank Satisfaction % Satisfaction Rank Importance- Satisfaction Rating I-S Rating Rank High Priority (IS .10-.20) Planning & zoning services 43% 1 56% 16 0.1918 1 Medium Priority (IS <.10) Traffic enforcement 23% 4 69% 13 0.0702 2 Police department/law enforcement 39% 2 85% 4 0.0568 3 Recycling services 17% 7 76% 10 0.0422 4 Code enforcement 13% 9 67% 14 0.0414 5 Programs for youth 18% 6 79% 9 0.0374 6 Recreation programs 16% 8 80% 7 0.0322 7 Building permit services 8% 12 63% 15 0.0315 8 Communications 9% 11 69% 12 0.0282 9 City parks 23% 3 89% 2 0.0249 10 Water services 9% 10 79%8 0.0195 11 Fire prevention & public education 8% 13 83%5 0.0132 12 Fire/rescue services 20% 5 94%1 0.0121 13 Sewer services 4% 15 81%6 0.0076 14 Garbage/trash pick-up services 5% 14 86%3 0.0071 15 Passport Acceptance Agency 1% 16 72% 11 0.0034 16 Page x E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   Other Findings  Ninety‐seven percent (97%) or residents surveyed indicated they have a working smoke detector in the home. Residents were informed that the Meridian Fire Department is working with other Treasure Valley Fire Departments which have produced cost savings and better effectiveness in exchange for group decision‐making for certain department operations. Knowing this, respondents were asked to indicate how strongly they agree or disagree with three statements regarding the level of cooperation and collaboration they would like to see happen. Ninety percent (90%) of respondents surveyed who had an opinion, indicated they either “strongly agree” or “agree” that their fire department should collaborate with other fire departments in operations. This item received the highest levels of agreement of the three statements that were rated. In general, 48% of residents oppose a city ordinance making it illegal within the City of Meridian to deny goods, services, housing, or employment to someone because he or she is gay, bisexual, or transgender. Thirteen percent (13%) of respondents indicated they were not sure whether or not they would favor or oppose the ordinance, and 39% indicated they would favor the ordinance. In general, 70% of residents favor a city ordinance prohibiting smoking within the City of Meridian in all indoor public places, including bars, and small businesses. Eighty‐eight percent (88%) of respondents indicated they have visited downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work. o When thinking about their visits downtown over the past year, 68% of respondents were either “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with their overall experience. Fifty percent (50%) of residents indicated that they would be willing to support a levy, to purchase farmland in order to preserve it for agricultural purposes. Forty‐two percent (42%) of residents would be in favor of allowing residents of a city the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax increase to provide funding for identified infrastructure improvements. Page xi Section 1  Charts and Graphs  City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 1 66% 57% 39% 35% 40% 37% 38% 32% 30% 34% 28% 34% 26% 11% 28% 36% 38% 39% 32% 35% 34% 38% 39% 33% 36% 28% 35% 15% 6% 7% 19% 21% 23% 24% 22% 20% 24% 24% 26% 26% 29% 30% 1% 1% 5% 5% 5% 5% 7% 10% 8% 8% 11% 12% 10% 44% As a place to raise a family As a place to live How well City is ensuring public safety As a place to work Building a strong sense of community Developing a strong local economy As a place to start/do business Efforts to protect the quality of air/water Efforts to maintain quality neighborhoods Communication with the community Developing sustainable/conscious environment Planning for future growth & development Developing a strong local workforce Providing mobility options other than driving 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Q1. Ratings of Items that Influence Perceptions of Meridian as a Community Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “excellent" and a rating of 0 meant “poor” (excluding “don't know”) 93% 91% 73% 66% 68% 66% 67% 67% 70% 58% 64% 66% 54% 27% 93% 92% 77% 74% 73% 72% 71% 70% 69% 67% 64% 62% 61% 26% As a place to raise a family As a place to live How well City is ensuring public safety As a place to work Building a strong sense of community Developing a strong local economy As a place to start/do business Efforts to protect the quality of air/water Efforts to maintain quality neighborhoods Communication with the community Developing sustainable/conscious environment Planning for future growth & development Developing a strong local workforce Providing mobility options other than driving 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q1. Ratings of Items that Influence Perceptions of Meridian as a Community - 2014 & 2017 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 2 43% 44% 48% 35% 42% 38% 32% 44% 13% 15% 15% 18% 2% 4% 5% 3% Overall quality of life in City Your view of an ideal place to live Customer service from City employees Overall quality of City services provided 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Greatly Exceeds Expectations) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Does Not Meet Expectations at All) Q2. How Well the City and Its Partners are Meeting the Expectations of Residents Related to Quality of Life in Meridian Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “greatly exceeds expectations" and a rating of 0 meant “does not meet my expectations at all” (excluding “don't know”) 83% 79% 78% 76% 85% 82% 80% 79% Overall quality of life in City Your view of an ideal place to live Customer service from City employees Overall quality of City services provided 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q2. How Well the City and Its Partners are Meeting the Expectations of Residents Related to Quality of Life in Meridian - 2014 & 2017 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 3 53% 38% 39% 38% 32% 29% 26% 20% 23% 32% 36% 34% 33% 37% 37% 35% 35% 32% 13% 20% 20% 22% 20% 26% 28% 33% 27% 2% 6% 8% 7% 10% 7% 12% 12% 18% Quality shopping/entertainment are accessible Quality housing & a variety of options exist Development in Meridian enhances quality of life Meridian has a sense of community The City is headed in right direction The City continuously improves services The City uses your tax dollars wisely Variety of employment opportunities exist The City is managing growth wisely 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Strongly Agree) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Strongly Disagree) Q3. Agreement with Various Statements about the City of Meridian Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “strongly agree" and a rating of 0 meant “strongly disagree” (excluding “don't know”) 81% 83% 74% 67% 68% 65% 55% 46% 56% 85% 74% 73% 71% 69% 66% 60% 55% 55% Quality shopping/entertainment are accessible Quality housing & a variety of options exist Development in Meridian enhances quality of life Meridian has a sense of community The City is headed in right direction The City continuously improves services The City uses your tax dollars wisely Variety of employment opportunities exist The City is managing growth wisely 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q3. Agreement with Various Statements about the City of Meridian - 2014 & 2017 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 4 Q4. Ratings of the Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant residents felt they were “definitely getting their money’s worth” and a rating of 0 meant residents felt they were “definitely not getting their money’s worth” (excluding “don't know”) 10-9 30% 8-7 42% 6-4 23% 3-2 3% 1-0 3% Definitely getting my money’s worth Definitely NOT getting my money’s worth Q4. Ratings of the Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees - 2014 & 2017 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant residents felt they were “definitely getting their money’s worth” and a rating of 0 meant residents felt they were “definitely not getting their money’s worth” (excluding “don't know”) 10-9 30% 8-7 42% 6-4 23% 3-2 3% 1-0 3% Definitely getting my money’s worth Definitely NOT getting my money’s worth Trends 10-9 24% 8-7 48% 6-4 22% 3-2 4% 1-0 2% Definitely getting my money’s worth Definitely NOT getting my money’s worth 20172014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 5 70% 62% 56% 55% 51% 44% 46% 46% 45% 45% 46% 36% 35% 36% 34% 27% 24% 27% 30% 30% 31% 36% 33% 34% 34% 30% 25% 33% 34% 31% 29% 29% 5% 9% 11% 12% 14% 17% 16% 15% 17% 18% 17% 24% 23% 24% 27% 27% 1% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 5% 4% 7% 12% 7% 9% 9% 10% 17% Fire/rescue services City parks Garbage/trash pick-up services Police department/Law enforcement Fire prevention & public education Sewer services Recreation programs Water services Programs for youth Recycling services Passport Acceptance Agency Communications Traffic enforcement Code enforcement Building permit services Planning & zoning services 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Q5. Overall Ratings of City Services Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “excellent" and a rating of 0 meant “poor” (excluding “don't know”) 91% 88% 85% 85% 80% 76% 76% 74% 80% 63% 67% 64% 64% 55% 94% 89% 86% 85% 81% 80% 79% 79% 76% 69% 69% 67% 63% 56% Fire/rescue services City parks Garbage/trash pick-up services Police department/law enforcement Sewer services Recreation programs Water services Programs for youth Recycling services Communications Traffic enforcement Code enforcement Building permit services Planning & zoning services 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q5. Overall Ratings of City Services - 2014 & 2017 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 6 43% 39% 23% 23% 20% 18% 17% 16% 13% 9% 9% 8% 8% 5% 4% 1% Planning & zoning services Police department/law enforcement City parks Traffic enforcement Fire/rescue services Programs for youth Recycling services Recreation programs Code enforcement Water services Communications Building permit services Fire prevention & public education Garbage/trash pick-up services Sewer services Passport Acceptance Agency 0%20%40% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice Q6. City Services that Residents Felt Should Receive the Most Emphasis from City Leaders Over the Next Two Years by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top THREE choices Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) 53% 46% 35% 37% 36% 34% 27% 26% 25% 24% 14% 13% 10% 31% 36% 39% 36% 37% 37% 35% 35% 35% 32% 30% 28% 17% 13% 17% 20% 21% 21% 17% 25% 27% 32% 25% 30% 34% 32% 3% 2% 6% 6% 6% 12% 13% 12% 8% 20% 26% 25% 42% Library services by Meridian Library District Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center Elections by Ada County clerk Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian K-12 education by West Ada School District Animal control Lakeview Golf Course Internet service by telecommunications provider State highways operated by I.T.D. All roads operated by Ada County Highway District Public transportation services 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Q7. Ratings of Services Provided by Other Agency Partners Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “excellent" and a rating of 0 meant “poor” (excluding “don't know”) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 7 85% 65% 52% 56% 61% 21% 84% 74% 62% 61% 60% 26% Library services by Meridian Library District Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Ctr K-12 education by Joint School District No. 2 Animal control Lakeview Golf Course Public transportation services 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q7. Ratings of Services Provided by Other Agency Partners - 2014 & 2017 64% 51% 45% 43% 46% 33% 23% 24% 30% 30% 27% 23% 31% 32% 9% 15% 19% 22% 20% 26% 30% 4% 4% 7% 8% 10% 10% 15% Roadway widening Intersection improvements Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets Sidewalks on arterial roadways Shared bike & pedestrian facilities Street lights Beautification/landscaping 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (High Priority) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (No Priority) Q8. Ratings of the Priority of Various Road-Related Projects Residents Would Like to See in Meridian Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “high priority" and a rating of 0 meant “no priority” (excluding “don't know”) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 8 67% 57% 56% 50% 48% 49% 36% 87% 81% 74% 70% 70% 64% 55% Roadway widening Intersection improvements Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets Sidewalks on arterial roadways Shared bike & pedestrian facilities Street lights Beautification/landscaping 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q8. Ratings of the Priority of Various Road-Related Projects Residents Would Like to See in Meridian 2014 & 2017 74% 52% 43% 33% 26% 23% 14% Roadway widening Intersection improvements Shared bike & pedestrian facilities Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets Sidewalks on arterial roadways Street lights Beautification/landscaping 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice Q9. Transportation Improvements that Residents Felt Should Receive the Most Emphasis from City Leaders Over the Next Two Years by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top THREE choices Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 9 60% 51% 48% 39% 36% 31% 31% 28% 24% 23% 24% 22% 20% 21% 18% 32% 37% 37% 37% 39% 37% 36% 34% 36% 34% 33% 34% 32% 31% 30% 7% 10% 12% 19% 20% 26% 26% 27% 32% 31% 31% 33% 31% 34% 34% 1% 2% 3% 5% 5% 6% 7% 12% 8% 12% 12% 11% 17% 15% 19% Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks Quality of athletic fields Number of City parks Quality of youth sports programs Availability of youth sports programs Number of special events & festivals Quality & variety of special events & festivals Availability of info about recreation programs Quality & variety of recreation programs & classes Quality of pathways for walking & biking Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events Number of recreation programs & classes Availability of community center & gym facilities Number of adult sports programs & sporting events Number of pathways for walking & biking 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Q10. Ratings of Parks and Recreation Services Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “excellent" and a rating of 0 meant “poor” (excluding “don't know”) 90% 86% 86% 75% 74% 61% 60% 55% 58% 58% 53% 39% 51% 41% 93% 88% 85% 76% 75% 67% 67% 60% 57% 57% 56% 52% 52% 47% Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks Quality of athletic fields Number of City parks Quality of youth sports programs Availability of youth sports programs Number of special events & festivals Quality/variety of special events & festivals Quality & variety of recreation programs & classes Quality of pathways for walking & biking Quality of adult sports programs/ events Number of recreation programs & classes Availability of community center/gyms Number of adult sports programs/events Number of pathways for walking & biking 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q10. Ratings of Parks and Recreation Services - 2014 & 2017 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 10 81% 9% No 10% by percentage of respondents Q11. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Yes, I have personally visited a City park Yes, a household member has visited a City park 82% 3% No 15% by percentage of respondents Q11. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? - 2014 & 2017 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Yes, I have personally visited a City park Yes, a household member has visited a City park Trends 81% 9% No 10% Yes, I have personally visited a City park Yes, a household member has visited a City park 20172014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 11 Q12. Ratings of the Sense of Community in Neighborhoods Throughout Meridian Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) 10-9 25% 8-7 29% 6-4 30% 3-2 10% 1-0 7% Very strong sense of community No sense of community at all by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “very strong sense of community" and a rating of 0 meant “no sense of community at all” (excluding “don't know”) Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) 10-9 25% 8-7 29% 6-4 30% 3-2 10% 1-0 7% Trends 10-9 22% 8-7 36% 6-4 28% 3-2 9% 1-0 5% 20172014 Q12. Ratings of the Sense of Community in Neighborhoods Throughout Meridian - 2014 & 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “very strong sense of community" and a rating of 0 meant “no sense of community at all” (excluding “don't know”) Very strong sense of community No sense of community at all Very strong sense of community No sense of community at all City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 12 75% 70% 71% 54% 58% 64% 60% 62% 48% 47% 39% 44% 27% 19% 24% 23% 37% 31% 26% 30% 26% 41% 34% 38% 34% 35% 5% 5% 5% 8% 9% 8% 9% 9% 11% 16% 17% 17% 27% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 3% 1% 4% 6% 6% 11% How quickly Fire Department respond to emergencies Overall quality of Fire Department Quality of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Overall feeling of safety in City Current location of fire stations Professionalism of those responding to emergencies Quality of local police protection How quickly police respond to emergencies Safety in City parks Fire safety education programs Police safety education programs Fire Department public outreach Visibility of police in neighborhoods 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Q13. Ratings of Public Safety Services Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “excellent" and a rating of 0 meant “poor” (excluding “don't know”) 90% 91% 91% 91% 86% 87% 88% 86% 84% 77% 72% 61% 94% 94% 94% 91% 90% 89% 89% 88% 88% 81% 78% 62% Fire response time to emergencies Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Overall quality of local fire protection Overall feeling of safety in City Location of fire stations Professionalism of emergency responders Quality of local police protection Police response time to emergencies Safety in City parks Fire safety education programs Police safety education programs Visibility of police in neighborhoods 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q13. Ratings of Public Safety Services - 2014 & 2017 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 13 46% 33% 34% 20% 22% 24% 35% 33% 32% 33% 31% 28% 15% 23% 24% 28% 31% 30% 4% 11% 11% 19% 16% 18% Removal of graffiti Illegal dumping Abandoned/junk automobile removal Weed abatement Dilapidated houses or buildings Clean-up of litter & debris on private property 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Q14. Ratings of the Enforcement of City Codes and Ordinances Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “excellent" and a rating of 0 meant “poor” (excluding “don't know”) 79% 64% 67% 51% 54% 55% 81% 66% 65% 53% 53% 52% Removal of graffiti Illegal dumping Abandoned/junk automobile removal Weed abatement Dilapidated houses or buildings Clean-up of litter/debris on private property 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q14. Ratings of the Enforcement of City Codes and Ordinances - 2014 & 2017 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 14 Yes 97% No 1%Don't know 2% by percentage of respondents Q15. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Yes 97.8% No 0.4% Don't know 1.8% by percentage of respondents Q15. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Yes 96.8% No 0.8% Don't know 2.4% 20172014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 15 70% 16% 13% 20% 11% 12% 7% 22% 25% 3% 51% 50% 0%20%40%60%80%100% (Strongly Agree) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Strongly Disagree) Q16. Level of Cooperation and Collaboration Respondents Would Like to See Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “strongly agree" and a rating of 0 meant “strongly disagree” (excluding “don't know”) Our Fire Department should consolidate operations with other cities into one area department Our Fire Department should collaborate with other Fire Departments in operations Our Fire Department should be completely independent in its operations Favor 39% Oppose 48% Not sure 13% by percentage of respondents Q17. In general, would you favor or oppose a city ordinance making it illegal within the City of Meridian to deny goods, services, housing, or employment to someone because he or she is gay, bisexual, or transgender? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 16 Favor 70% Oppose 24% Not sure 6% by percentage of respondents Q18. Under state law, smoking is prohibited in restaurants and most workplaces, but allowed in bars and small businesses with less than 5 employees. In general, would you favor or oppose a city ordinance prohibiting smoking within the City of Meridian in all indoor public places, including bars, and small businesses? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) 43% 35% 32% 32% 27% 38% 39% 39% 38% 34% 14% 20% 21% 24% 27% 6% 6% 8% 7% 13% Usefulness of online services on City website Quality of www.meridiancity.org 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Q19. Ratings of the City’s Communication Services Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “excellent" and a rating of 0 meant “poor” (excluding “don't know”) Opportunities for public involvement in local decision making Quality of information about City programs & services Effectiveness of City communications with the public City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 17 66% 67% 59% 52% 52% 80% 74% 72% 70% 60% Usefulness of online services on City website Quality of www.meridiancity.org Information about City programs & services Effectiveness of communications w/ public Public involvement in local decision-making 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents who rated the item as a 10, 9, 8 or 7 on a 10-point scale (excluding don't knows) TrendsSource: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q19. Ratings of the City’s Communication Services 2014 & 2017 Q20. Where do you currently get information about Meridian's services and programs? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) 49% 48% 47% 47% 27% 21% 20% 17% 6% 5% 3% 2% 5% Flyers in utility bills City website Television/news Social media Newspaper Emails from City Radio Information booklets/City publications Events such as Coffee with Mayor, Town Halls Other Events such as Coffee with the Mayor Twitter Other 0%20%40%60% by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 18 Q20. Where do you currently get information about Meridian's services and programs? - 2014 & 2017 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) 56% 42% 50% 42% 18% 17% 19% 3% 49% 48% 47% 27% 21% 20% 17% 6% Flyers in utility bills City website Television/news Newspaper Emails from City Radio Information booklets/City publications Events such as Coffee with the Mayor 0%20%40%60% 2014 2017 by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) Trends Q21. If the City were to expand to another communication platform, from which new platform would you prefer to receive information about Meridian’s services and programs? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents Mobile applications 32% Texts 16% None 47% Other source 5% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 19 by percentage of respondents Q22. Did you visit downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Yes 88% No 11% Don't remember 2% by percentage of respondents Q22. Did you visit downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work? 2014 & 2017 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Yes 85% No 13% Don't know 2% Yes 88% No 11% Don't know 2% 20172014 Trends City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 20 Q22a. When you think about your visits to Downtown over the last year, how satisfied were you with your overall experience? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who had visited downtown during the past year Very satisfied 32% Somewhat satisfied 36% Neutral 18% Somewhat dissatisfied 8% Very dissatisfied 5%Not provided 1% Trends Q22a. When you think about your visits to Downtown over the last year, how satisfied were you with your overall experience? - 2014 & 2017 Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who had visited downtown during the past year Very satisfied 32% Somewhat satisfied 36% Neutral 18% Somewhat dissatisfied 8% Very dissatisfied 5%Not provided 1% Very satisfied 31% Somewhat satisfied 28% Neutral 26% Somewhat dissatisfied 7% Very dissatisfied 6%Don't know 2% 2017 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 21 66% 46% 45% 42% 38% 38% 21% 18% 64% 23% 28% 28% 28% 31% 24% 23% 21% 12% 7% 17% 17% 20% 19% 20% 27% 30% 12% 4% 9% 10% 10% 12% 19% 29% 31% 12% Restaurants Live music venues Performance art (plays/opera/symphony) Movie theatre Live event venues (i.e., comedy club/magician) Brewer/wine tasting rooms Bars & nightclubs Pool hall/arcade/bingo Other 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Excellent) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Poor) Q23. Nightlife and Entertainment Options Respondents Believe Would Positively Contribute to a Vibrant Downtown Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “excellent" and a rating of 0 meant “poor” (excluding “don't know”) 55% 34% 28% 20% 17% 14% 7% 4% 6% Restaurants Live music venues Performance art (plays/opera/symphony) Live event venues (i.e., comedy club/magician) Brewer/wine tasting rooms Movie theatre Bars & nightclubs Pool hall/arcade/bingo Other 0%20%40%60% 1st Choice 2nd Choice Q24. Nightlife and Entertainment Options You Think the City Should Most Focus Their Attention over the Next Three Years by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top TWO choices Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 22 Yes 50% No 27% Not sure 23% by percentage of respondents Q25. Meridian continues to grow, and there has been an indication that preserving farmland is important to the community. One way to preserve farmland would be by voter initiative to enact a levy to purchase farmland in order to preserve it for agricultural purposes. In general, would you be willing to support a levy, similar to the Boise Foothills Levy for this purpose? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Favor 42% Oppose 37% Not sure 21% by percentage of respondents Q26. In general, would you favor or oppose allowing residents of a city the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax (local option tax) increase to provide funding for identified infrastructure improvements in the community? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 23 41% 39% 35% 34% 34% 24% 31% 24% 18% 20% 22% 22% 22% 25% 17% 18% 16% 19% 21% 20% 23% 28% 21% 23% 25% 23% 22% 24% 22% 23% 31% 35% Constructing Linder Road Overpass Adding more bike lanes & pathways Providing more public transportation options Developing a pathway along rail corridor Building a performing arts center Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion Building an indoor aquatics center Building a multipurpose center 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Highly Likely) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (Highly Unlikely) Q27. The City of Meridian has taken the position to save money for future improvements and not use bonds for new facilities. If the City were to place a bond measure on the ballot for $10 million that could cost homeowners approximately .91 cents per month for a home with an assessed value of $100 thousand, in general would you support this bond for the following items. Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “highly likely" and a rating of 0 meant “very unlikely” (excluding “don't know”) 36% 29% 23% 23% 22% 16% 15% 13% Constructing Linder Road Overpass Adding more bike lanes & pathways Providing more public transportation options Building an indoor aquatics center Building a performing arts center Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion Building a multipurpose center Developing a pathway along rail corridor 0%20%40% 1st Choice 2nd Choice Q28. Which Two Options Would you be Most Willing to Support? by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top TWO choices Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 24 79% 72% 55% 57% 39% 39% 36% 31% 36% 29% 27% 30% 5% 17% 18% 30% 25% 30% 26% 28% 32% 27% 32% 29% 25% 11% 3% 8% 13% 12% 22% 23% 25% 25% 23% 28% 29% 26% 30% 1% 3% 2% 6% 9% 13% 11% 12% 15% 11% 16% 20% 55% Roads/traffic/transportation Education/schools Jobs/economic development Growth/development Pathway/sidewalk connections Public transportation Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) Downtown redevelopment Access to mental health services City tax burden Homelessness/social services Affordable housing AirBnB/vacation rentals 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (High Priority) 10-9 8-7 6-4 3-0 (No Priority) Q29. How Important are the Following Community Issues? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11-point scale, where a rating of 10 meant “high priority" and a rating of 0 meant “no priority” (excluding “don't know”) 70% 50% 37% 27% 18% 16% 14% 13% 11% 9% 8% 8% 1% Roads/traffic/transportation Education/schools Growth/development Jobs/economic development Pathway/sidewalk connections Public transportation Affordable housing Downtown redevelopment Access to mental health services City tax burden Homelessness/social services Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) AirBnB/vacation rentals 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 1st Choice 2nd Choice Series 3 Q30. Which Three Priorities Should Receive the Most Emphasis from City Leaders over the Next Three Years? by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top THREE choices Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 25 Male 49% Female 50% Not provided 1% Q32. Gender of Respondents by percentage of respondents Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q33. Age of Respondents by percentage of respondents 18-34 19% 35-44 20% 45-54 20% 55-64 20% 65+ 19% Not provided 2% Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 26 Q34. Which of the following be describes the home in which you live? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents 93% An apartment 2% Townhouse or duplex 3% Other 1% Not provided 1% A detached single-family house Own 83% Rent 16% Don't know 1%Other 1% by percentage of respondents Q35. Do you own or rent your home? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 27 Q36. How many years and months have you lived in Meridian? by percentage of respondents 5 or less 31% 6 to 10 18% 11 to 15 17% 16 to 20 13% 21 to 30 12% 31+ 5% Not Provided 5% Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) MonthsYears 0 18%1 6% 2 8% 3 8% 4 5% 5 8% 6 13% 7 5% 8 5% 9 10% 10 6% 11 6% 12+ 1% Q37. Ages of Household Occupants by percentage of respondents Under age 5 7% Ages 5-9 8% Ages 10-14 9% Ages 15-17 6% Ages 18+ 70% Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 28 Yes 52% No 48% by percentage of respondents Q38. Does your household have a dog? One 60% Two 35% Three 5% Four or more 1% Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q38a. How many dogs do you have in your household? Yes 52% No 48% by percentage of respondents Yes 85% No 15% Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Q38b. Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually? Q38. Does your household have a dog? City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 29 Q39. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) 49.5% 25.4% 9.2% 5.1% 4.3% 1.7% 1.1% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.5% 0.3% Employed full time Retired Self-employed Not employed outside home, a homemaker Employed part time Not employed due to a disability Not employed, but seeking work A student working full time A full-time student, not working A student working part time Not employed, but not seeking work Other 0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0% by percentage of respondents Q40. What is the approximate total annual family income of all members of your household? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents Less than $20K 2% $20K-$34,999 7% $35K-$49,999 8% $50K-$74,999 18% $75K-$99,999 19% $100K-$149,999 19% $150K-$199,999 8% $200K+ 6% Not sure 12% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 30 by percentage of respondents Q41. How do you make and receive phone calls? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Landline 3% Cell phone 71%Both 25% Not provided 2% by percentage of respondents who use both a landline and cell phone to make and receive phone calls Q41a. Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receive calls? Cell phone 62% Landline 33% Not provided 5% Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 31 by percentage of respondents who use a cell phone to make and receive phone calls Q41b. Who is your cell phone service provider Verizon 54% AT&T 15% T-Mobile 11% Sprint 8%Other 6% Not provided 5% Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) by percentage of respondents Q42. Who is your Internet Service Provider? Source: ETC Institute DirectionFinder (2017 - Meridian, ID) Centurylink 51% CableOne 38% CTC/Westel Fiber 4% Other 3% Not sure 5% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 32                 Section 2  Importance‐Satisfaction Analysis                       City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 33 I m p o r t a n c e ‐ S a t i s f a c t i o n   A n a l y s i s   Importance‐Satisfaction Analysis  City of Meridian, Idaho  Today, City officials have limited resources which need to be targeted to activities that are  of the most benefit to their citizens. Two of the most important criteria for decision making  are (1) to target resources toward services of the highest importance to citizens; and (2) to  target resources toward those services where citizens are the least satisfied.  The Importance‐Satisfaction (IS) rating is a unique tool that allows public officials to better  understand both of these highly important decision making criteria for each of the services  they are providing. The Importance‐Satisfaction rating is based on the concept that public  agencies will maximize overall customer satisfaction by emphasizing improvements in those  areas where the level of satisfaction is relatively low and the perceived importance of the  service is relatively high.   The rating is calculated by summing the percentage of responses for items selected as the  first, second, and third most important services for the City to provide. The sum is then  multiplied by 1 minus the percentage of respondents who indicated they were positively  satisfied with the City’s performance in the related area (the sum of the ratings of 4 and 5 on  a 5‐point scale excluding “Don’t Know” responses). “Don’t Know” responses are excluded  from the calculation to ensure the satisfaction ratings among service categories are  comparable. [IS=Importance x (1‐Satisfaction)].  Example of the Calculation: Respondents were asked to identify the major categories of City  services they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years. Forty‐three  percent (43%) of respondents selected planning and zoning services as one of the most  important services for the City to provide.   Regarding satisfaction, 56% of respondents surveyed rated the City’s overall performance in  planning and zoning services as a “10”, “9”, “8”, or “7” on an 11‐point scale (where “10”  means “Excellent”) excluding “Don’t Know” responses. The I‐S rating for planning and zoning  services was calculated by multiplying the sum of the most important percentages by 1 minus  the sum of the satisfaction percentages. In this example 43% was multiplied by 44% (1‐0.56).  This calculation yielded an I‐S rating of 0.1918 which ranked first out of 16 major service  categories.   Page 34 I m p o r t a n c e ‐ S a t i s f a c t i o n   A n a l y s i s   The maximum rating is 1.00 and would be achieved when 100% of the respondents select an  item as one of their top three choices to emphasize over the next two years and 0% indicate  they are positively satisfied with the delivery of the service.   The lowest rating is 0.00 and could be achieved under either of the following two situations:   If 100% of the respondents were positively satisfied with the delivery of the service If none (0%) of the respondents selected the service as one for the three most important areas for the City to emphasize over the next two years. Interpreting the Ratings  Ratings that are greater than or equal to 0.20 identify areas that should receive significantly  more emphasis over the next two years. Ratings from 0.10 to 0.20 identify service areas that  should receive increased emphasis. Ratings less than 0.10 should continue to receive the  current level of emphasis.   Definitely Increase Emphasis (IS>=0.20) Increase Current Emphasis (0.10<=IS<0.20) Maintain Current Emphasis (IS<0.10) The results for the City of Meridian are provided on the following pages.   Page 35 20 1 7 I m p o r t a n c e - S a t i s f a c t i o n R a t i n g Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n Ma j o r C a t e g o r i e s o f C i t y S e r v i c e s Ca t e g o r y o f S e r v i c e Mo s t Im p o r t a n t % Mo s t Im p o r t a n t Ra n k Sa t i s f a c t i o n % Sa t i s f a c t i o n Ra n k Im p o r t a n c e - Sa t i s f a c t i o n Ra t i n g I- S R a t i n g Ra n k Hi g h P r i o r i t y ( I S . 1 0 - . 2 0 ) Pl a n n i n g & z o n i n g s e r v i c e s 43 % 1 56 % 16 0. 1 9 1 8 1 Me d i u m P r i o r i t y ( I S < . 1 0 ) Tr a f f i c e n f o r c e m e n t 23 % 4 69 % 1 3 0 . 0 7 0 2 2 Po l i c e d e p a r t m e n t / l a w e n f o r c e m e n t 39 % 28 5 % 4 0 . 0 5 6 8 3 Re c y c l i n g s e r v i c e s 17 % 7 7 6 % 10 0. 0 4 2 2 4 Co d e e n f o r c e m e n t 13 % 9 67 % 14 0 . 0 4 1 4 5 Pr o g ra m s f o r y ou t h 18 % 6 7 9 % 9 0 . 0 3 7 4 6 Re c r e a t i o n p ro g ra m s 16 % 8 8 0 % 7 0 . 0 3 2 2 7 Bu i l d i n g p e r m i t s e r v i c e s 8% 1 2 6 3 % 1 5 0 . 0 3 1 5 8 Co m m u n i c a t i o n s 9% 1 1 6 9 % 12 0. 0 2 8 2 9 Ci t y p ar k s 23 % 3 8 9 % 2 0 . 0 2 4 9 1 0 Wa t e r s e r v i c e s 9% 10 79 % 8 0 . 0 1 9 5 1 1 Fi r e p r e v e n t i o n & p u b l i c e d u c a t i o n 8% 13 83 % 5 0. 0 1 3 2 12 Fi r e / r e s c u e s e r v i c e s 20 % 5 94 % 1 0 . 0 1 2 1 13 Se w e r s e r v i c e s 4% 15 81 % 6 0. 0 0 7 6 14 Ga r b a g e / t r a s h p i c k - u p s e r v i c e s 5% 14 86 % 3 0 . 0 0 7 1 1 5 Pa s s p or t A c c e p ta n c e A g en c y 1% 1 6 7 2 % 11 0 . 0 0 3 4 1 6 ` No t e : T h e I - S R a t i n g i s c a l c u l a t e d b y m u l t i p l y i n g t h e " M o s t I m p o r t a n t " % b y ( 1 - ' S a t i s f a c t i o n ' % ) Mo s t I m p o r t a n t % : Th e " M o s t I m p o r t a n t " p e r c e n t a g e r e p r e s e n t s t h e s u m o f t h e f i r s t , s e c o n d , a n d t h i r d mo s t i m p o r t a n t r e s p o n s e s f o r e a c h i t e m . R e s p o n d e n t s w e r e a s k e d t o i d e n t i f y th e i t e m s t h e y t h o u g h t s h o u l d b e t h e C i t y ' s t o p p r i o r i t i e s . Sa t i s f a c t i o n % : Th e " S a t i s f a c t i o n " p e r c e n t a g e r e p r e s e n t s t h e s u m o f t h e r a t i n g s 1 0 , 9 , 8 , a n d 7 e x c l u d i n g ' d o n ' t k n o w s . ' Re s p o n d e n t s r a n k e d t h e i r l e v e l o f s a t i s f a c t i o n w i t h e a c h o f t h e i t e m s o n a s c a l e of 1 0 t o 0 w i t h " 1 0 " b e i n g E x c e l l e n t a n d " 0 " b e i n g P o o r . © 2 0 1 7 D i r e c t i o n F i n d e r b y E T C I n s t i t u t e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 36 I m p o r t a n c e ‐ S a t i s f a c t i o n   A n a l y s i s   Importance‐Satisfaction Matrix Analysis.    The Importance‐Satisfaction rating is based on the concept that public agencies will maximize  overall customer satisfaction by emphasizing improvements in those areas where the level of  satisfaction is relatively low and the perceived importance of the service is relatively high.   ETC Institute developed an Importance‐Satisfaction Matrix to display the perceived  importance of major services that were assessed on the survey against the perceived quality  of service delivery.  The two axes on the matrix represent Satisfaction (vertical) and relative  Importance (horizontal).   The I‐S (Importance‐Satisfaction) matrix should be interpreted as follows.   Continued Emphasis (above average importance and above average satisfaction).  This area shows where the City is meeting customer expectations. Items in this area have a significant impact on the customer’s overall level of satisfaction.  The City should maintain (or slightly increase) emphasis on items in this area. Exceeding Expectations (below average importance and above average satisfaction).   This area shows where the City is performing significantly better than customers expect the City to perform.  Items in this area do not significantly affect the overall level of satisfaction that residents have with City services.  The City should maintain (or slightly decrease) emphasis on items in this area. Opportunities for Improvement (above average importance and below average satisfaction).  This area shows where the City is not performing as well as residents expect the City to perform.  This area has a significant impact on customer satisfaction, and the City should DEFINITELY increase emphasis on items in this area. Less Important (below average importance and below average satisfaction).  This area shows where the City is not performing well relative to the City’s performance in other areas; however, this area is generally considered to be less important to residents. This area does not significantly affect overall satisfaction with City services because the items are less important to residents.  The agency should maintain current levels of emphasis on items in this area. Matrices showing the results for the City of Meridian are provided on the following pages.  Page 37 Sa t i s f a c t i o n R a t i n g                 me a n s a t i s f a c t i o n Opportunities for Improvement 2017 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Importance-Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -City Services- (points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey) mean importance Importance RatingLower Importance Higher Importance lower importance/higher satisfaction higher importance/higher satisfaction lower importance/lower satisfaction higher importance/lower satisfaction Exceeded Expectations Less Important Continued Emphasis Source: ETC Institute (2017) Passport Acceptance Agency Planning & zoning services Police department/Law enforcement City parks Traffic enforcement Fire/rescue services Programs for youth Recycling services Recreation programs Code enforcement Water services Communications Building permit services Fire prevention & public education Garbage/trash pick-up services Sewer services City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 38 Section 3  Benchmarking Data  City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 39 E x e c u t i v e   S u m m a r y   R e p o r t   Benchmarking Summary Report  City of Meridian, Idaho  ETC Institute's DirectionFinder program was originally developed in 1999 to help community  leaders across the United States use statistically valid community survey data as a tool for  making better decisions. Since November of 1999, the survey has been administered in  more than 230 cities in 43 states. Most participating cities conduct the survey on an annual  or biennial basis.  This report contains benchmarking data from three sources: (1) a national survey that was  administered by ETC Institute during the fall of 2016 to a random sample of more than  4,000 residents across the United States, (2) a regional survey administered to over 375  residents living in the Mountain Region of the United States during the fall of 2016. The  Mountain Region includes residents living in the following states: Montana, Utah, Wyoming,  Colorado, and Idaho.    The charts on the following pages show how the overall results for Meridian compare to the  United States national and regional averages based on the results of the 2016 survey that was  administered by ETC institute to a random sample of over 4,000 residents across the United  States, and the regional survey administered to over 375 residents living in the Mountain  Region of the United States. Meridian’s results are shown in blue, the Mountain Region  averages are shown in red, and the National averages are shown in yellow.   Page 40 93% 92% 74% 62% 62% 64% 46% 53% 68% 70% 54% 53% As a place to raise a family As a place to live As a place to work Planning for future growth & development 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Meridian Mountain Region U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don’t knows) Source: 2017 ETC Institute Ratings of Items that Influence Perceptions of the City Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 41 85% 80% 79% 72% 69% 75% 52% 54% 41% 53% 73% 47% 49% 38% 53% Overall quality of life in City Customer service from City employees Overall quality of City services provided Overall value received for City taxes/fees The City is moving in the right direction 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Meridian Mountain Region U.S. Ratings of Items Related to Quality of Life Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don’t knows) Source: 2017 ETC Institute 94% 86% 81% 80% 79% 76% 69% 67% 82% 73% 75% 60% 70% 60% 64% 50% 83% 69% 66% 60% 63% 69% 64% 52% Fire/rescue services Garbage/trash pick-up services Sewer services Recreation programs Water services Recycling services Traffic enforcement Code enforcement 0%20%40%60%80% 100% Meridian Mountain Region U.S. Source: 2017 ETC Institute Overall Ratings of City Services Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don’t knows) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 42 84% 73% 62% 61% 60% 41% 26% 70% 32% 61% 58% 43% 49% 49% 74% 35% 56% 58% 45% 50% 43% Library services by Meridian Library District Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District K-12 education by West Ada School District Animal control Lakeview Golf Course All City roads operated by Ada County Highway Dist Public transportation services 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Meridian Mountain Region U.S. Ratings of Services Provided by Other Governmental Entities, Agencies and Groups Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. Source: 2017 ETC Institute by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don’t knows) 80% 70% 60% 56% 50% 36% 62% 47% 34% Usefulness of online services on City website Effectiveness of City communications w/ the public Public involvement in local decision making 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Meridian Mountain Region U.S. Ratings of Communication Services Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. Source: 2017 ETC Institute by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don’t knows) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 43 93% 88% 85% 76% 57% 57% 47% 63% 64% 62% 56% 57% 50% 59% 70% 65% 68% 60% 59% 54% 63% Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks Quality of athletic fields Number of City parks Quality of youth sports programs Quality of pathways for walking & biking Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events Number of pathways for walking & biking 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Meridian Mountain Region U.S. Ratings of Parks and Recreation Services Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. Source: 2017 ETC Institute by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don’t knows) 94% 94% 94% 91% 89% 88% 81% 78% 62% 84% 82% 85% 70% 74% 60% 64% 48% 53% 84% 83% 80% 69% 70% 65% 65% 54% 59% How quickly Fire Department respond to emergencies Overall quality of Fire Department Quality of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Overall feeling of safety in City Quality of local police protection How quickly police respond to emergencies Fire safety education programs Police safety education programs Visibility of police in neighborhoods 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Meridian Mountain Region U.S. Ratings of Public Safety Services Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. Source: 2017 ETC Institute by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don’t knows) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 44 65% 53% 52% 51% 37% 34% 48% 41% 41% Abandoned/junk automobile removal Weed abatement Clean-up of litter & debris on private property 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Meridian Mountain Region U.S. Ratings of the Enforcement of Codes and Ordinances Meridian vs. Mountain Region vs. the U.S. Source: 2017 ETC Institute by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don’t knows) City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 45 Section 4  Tabular Data  City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 46 Q1. The vision for the City of Meridian is as follows: "By 2035, Meridian will be the West's premier community to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas: (N=743) E x c e l l - D o n ' t ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q1a. As a place to live 36.6% 19.5% 24.6% 10.9% 3.4% 2.6% 0.5% 0.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.8% Q1b. As a place to work 17.2% 9.4% 16.3% 13.9% 7.1% 6.2% 2.7% 1.3% 1.5% 0.5% 0.8% 23.0% Q1c. As a place to raise a family 39.2% 23.8% 17.8% 8.6% 3.1% 1.9% 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 4.3% Q1d. As a place to start/do business 13.5% 10.4% 12.8% 8.5% 6.3% 6.1% 1.6% 1.6% 1.2% 0.8% 0.5% 36.7% Q1e. As a City that is building a strong sense of community 23.3% 16.2% 17.0% 14.5% 8.9% 9.2% 4.0% 1.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.2% 2.3% Q1f. As a City that is developing a strong local economy 19.1% 14.5% 16.8% 14.9% 9.2% 8.5% 4.0% 1.7% 1.3% 0.3% 1.2% 8.3% Q1g. As a City that is developing a strong local workforce 12.4% 8.7% 13.9% 14.9% 10.8% 9.0% 4.2% 4.3% 1.6% 1.2% 1.3% 17.6% Q1h. As a City that is planning for future growth & development 18.4% 14.1% 14.0% 12.5% 11.4% 8.1% 5.0% 3.2% 3.0% 1.2% 4.2% 4.8% Q1i. As a City that is developing a sustainable & conscious environment 13.6% 11.7% 17.1% 14.9% 9.3% 9.4% 4.4% 3.5% 2.2% 1.1% 3.0% 9.8% Q1j. How well City is protecting quality of air & water 14.5% 11.8% 16.3% 14.8% 7.0% 6.1% 3.1% 2.8% 2.6% 0.3% 2.7% 18.0% Q1k. How well City is maintaining high quality neighborhoods 15.6% 12.7% 20.5% 17.4% 11.6% 7.7% 3.4% 2.7% 1.3% 0.7% 2.6% 4.0% Q1l. How well City is providing options for mobility other than driving 6.3% 3.5% 6.1% 6.9% 7.0% 11.7% 7.8% 8.5% 8.9% 7.8% 12.8% 12.8% Q1m. How well City is ensuring public safety 19.5% 17.2% 20.3% 15.7% 7.3% 7.9% 2.6% 2.3% 0.9% 0.5% 0.5% 5.1% Q1n. How well City is communicating with the community 18.0% 15.1% 16.7% 15.1% 10.9% 10.0% 2.7% 3.1% 1.9% 1.1% 2.2% 3.4% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 47     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q1. The vision for the City of Meridian is as follows: "By 2035, Meridian will be the West's premier community to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas: (without "don't know") (N=743) E x c e l l e - nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q1a. As a place to live 36.9% 19.7% 24.8% 11.0% 3.4% 2.6% 0.5% 0.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% Q1b. As a place to work 22.4% 12.2% 21.2% 18.0% 9.3% 8.0% 3.5% 1.7% 1.9% 0.7% 1.0% Q1c. As a place to raise a family 40.9% 24.9% 18.6% 9.0% 3.2% 2.0% 0.6% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Q1d. As a place to start/do business 21.3% 16.4% 20.2% 13.4% 10.0% 9.6% 2.6% 2.6% 1.9% 1.3% 0.9% Q1e. As a City that is building a strong sense of community 23.8% 16.5% 17.4% 14.9% 9.1% 9.4% 4.1% 1.8% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% Q1f. As a City that is developing a strong local economy 20.9% 15.9% 18.4% 16.3% 10.0% 9.3% 4.4% 1.9% 1.5% 0.3% 1.3% Q1g. As a City that is developing a strong local workforce 15.0% 10.6% 16.8% 18.1% 13.1% 10.9% 5.1% 5.2% 2.0% 1.5% 1.6% Q1h. As a City that is planning for future growth & development 19.4% 14.9% 14.7% 13.2% 12.0% 8.5% 5.2% 3.4% 3.1% 1.3% 4.4% Q1i. As a City that is developing a sustainable & conscious environment 15.1% 13.0% 19.0% 16.6% 10.3% 10.4% 4.9% 3.9% 2.4% 1.2% 3.3% Q1j. How well City is protecting quality of air & water 17.7% 14.4% 19.9% 18.1% 8.5% 7.4% 3.8% 3.4% 3.1% 0.3% 3.3% Q1k. How well City is maintaining high quality neighborhoods 16.3% 13.2% 21.3% 18.1% 12.1% 8.0% 3.5% 2.8% 1.4% 0.7% 2.7% Q1l. How well City is providing options for mobility other than driving 7.3% 4.0% 6.9% 7.9% 8.0% 13.4% 9.0% 9.7% 10.2% 9.0% 14.7% Q1m. How well City is ensuring public safety 20.6% 18.2% 21.4% 16.6% 7.7% 8.4% 2.7% 2.4% 1.0% 0.6% 0.6% Q1n. How well City is communicating with the community 18.7% 15.6% 17.3% 15.6% 11.3% 10.3% 2.8% 3.2% 1.9% 1.1% 2.2% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 48     Q2. While the City is not the sole contributor to your quality of life, it is important to understand the perceptions residents have of the quality of life in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Greatly Exceeds My Expectations" and 0 means "Does Not Meet My Expectations at All," please rate the City and its partners in the following areas: (N=743) G r e a t l - D o e s y n o t excee- meet d s m y m y D o n ' t expec... 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 expec... know Q2a. Overall quality of life in City 18.6% 23.8% 28.1% 13.9% 6.2% 5.9% 0.9% 1.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.4% 0.7% Q2b. Overall quality of City services provided 13.5% 20.9% 26.5% 17.0% 9.2% 5.1% 3.0% 1.6% 0.4% 0.7% 0.5% 1.7% Q2c. Overall quality of customer service you receive from City employees 19.1% 20.7% 14.1% 12.0% 5.5% 5.0% 1.7% 2.0% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 17.6% Q2d. Your view of an ideal place to live 19.2% 24.5% 22.3% 14.7% 7.1% 5.7% 1.6% 1.2% 1.2% 0.3% 0.8% 1.3% WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q2. While the City is not the sole contributor to your quality of life, it is important to understand the perceptions residents have of the quality of life in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Greatly Exceeds My Expectations" and 0 means "Does Not Meet My Expectations at All," please rate the City and its partners in the following areas: (without "don't know") (N=743) G r e a t l y D o e s exceed- not s m y m e e t e x p e c t - m y ations 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 expect... Q2a. Overall quality of life in City 18.7% 24.0% 28.3% 14.0% 6.2% 6.0% 0.9% 1.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.4% Q2b. Overall quality of City services provided 13.7% 21.2% 27.0% 17.3% 9.3% 5.2% 3.0% 1.6% 0.4% 0.7% 0.5% Q2c. Overall quality of customer service you receive from City employees 23.2% 25.2% 17.2% 14.5% 6.7% 6.0% 2.1% 2.5% 1.0% 0.8% 0.8% Q2d. Your view of an ideal place to live 19.5% 24.8% 22.6% 14.9% 7.2% 5.7% 1.6% 1.2% 1.2% 0.3% 0.8% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 49     Q3. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Strongly Agree" and 0 means "Strongly Disagree," please rate your level of agreement with the following. (N=743) S t r o n g - S t r o n g - l y l y D i s a g r - D o n ' t agree 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ee know Q3a. Quality housing & a variety of options exist in Meridian 20.6% 16.3% 21.8% 13.2% 8.2% 7.0% 4.2% 1.9% 0.9% 0.7% 2.0% 3.2% Q3b. Development in City enhances quality of life 20.5% 16.6% 19.1% 13.5% 7.9% 7.1% 3.6% 2.8% 1.7% 0.8% 2.2% 4.2% Q3c. There are a variety of employment opportunities in Meridian 8.3% 7.1% 13.3% 14.1% 11.2% 9.7% 4.7% 3.8% 2.3% 1.5% 2.2% 21.8% Q3d. Access to quality shopping & entertainment exist in Meridian 29.9% 22.5% 19.1% 12.7% 4.6% 5.2% 3.0% 1.1% 0.3% 0.5% 0.4% 0.8% Q3e. City is managing growth wisely 9.6% 12.1% 14.7% 14.8% 10.4% 8.5% 6.5% 4.2% 4.0% 2.6% 6.1% 6.7% Q3f. Meridian has a sense of community 19.1% 17.5% 19.0% 13.6% 9.2% 8.9% 3.6% 2.4% 2.2% 1.1% 1.2% 2.3% Q3g. City continuously improves services 12.7% 12.7% 17.1% 15.6% 10.6% 8.6% 3.9% 2.3% 1.3% 1.6% 1.2% 12.4% Q3h. City uses your tax dollars wisely 9.8% 11.4% 13.5% 15.2% 9.3% 9.8% 3.9% 2.6% 1.6% 1.7% 4.0% 17.1% Q3i. City is headed in right direction 15.7% 15.1% 19.0% 16.4% 8.6% 8.1% 2.6% 2.6% 2.3% 1.9% 3.1% 4.7% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 50     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q3. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Strongly Agree" and 0 means "Strongly Disagree," please rate your level of agreement with the following. (without "don't know") (N=743) S t r o n g - l y S t r o n g - D i s a g r - ly agree 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ee Q3a. Quality housing & a variety of options exist in Meridian 21.3% 16.8% 22.5% 13.6% 8.5% 7.2% 4.3% 1.9% 1.0% 0.7% 2.1% Q3b. Development in City enhances quality of life 21.3% 17.3% 19.9% 14.0% 8.3% 7.4% 3.8% 2.9% 1.8% 0.8% 2.2% Q3c. There are a variety of employment opportunities in Meridian 10.7% 9.1% 17.0% 18.1% 14.3% 12.4% 6.0% 4.8% 2.9% 1.9% 2.8% Q3d. Access to quality shopping & entertainment exist in Meridian 30.1% 22.7% 19.3% 12.8% 4.6% 5.3% 3.0% 1.1% 0.3% 0.5% 0.4% Q3e. City is managing growth wisely 10.2% 13.0% 15.7% 15.9% 11.1% 9.1% 6.9% 4.5% 4.3% 2.7% 6.5% Q3f. Meridian has a sense of community 19.6% 17.9% 19.4% 13.9% 9.4% 9.1% 3.7% 2.5% 2.2% 1.1% 1.2% Q3g. City continuously improves services 14.4% 14.4% 19.5% 17.8% 12.1% 9.8% 4.5% 2.6% 1.5% 1.8% 1.4% Q3h. City uses your tax dollars wisely 11.9% 13.8% 16.2% 18.3% 11.2% 11.9% 4.7% 3.1% 1.9% 2.1% 4.9% Q3i. City is headed in right direction 16.5% 15.8% 19.9% 17.2% 9.0% 8.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.4% 2.0% 3.2% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 51 Q4. If you own a home in Meridian, approximately 29% of your total property tax bill goes to the City of Meridian to fund the City's operating budget for services such as police, fire and parks services. Relating to services and facilities in the City of Meridian, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Definitely Getting My Money's Worth" and 0 means "Definitely Not Getting My Money's Worth," please rate the value you feel you are getting for City tax dollars and fees. (N=743) Definite- Definite- l y l y n o t getting getting m y m y D o n ' t money'... 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 money'... know Q4a. Value received for City tax & fees 13.2% 13.6% 18.2% 18.8% 9.2% 8.5% 2.7% 1.6% 0.7% 0.5% 1.7% 11.3% WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q4. If you own a home in Meridian, approximately 29% of your total property tax bill goes to the City of Meridian to fund the City's operating budget for services such as police, fire and parks services. Relating to services and facilities in the City of Meridian, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Definitely Getting My Money's Worth" and 0 means "Definitely Not Getting My Money's Worth," please rate the value you feel you are getting for City tax dollars and fees. (without "don't know") (N=743) Definitel- Definitel- y getting y not my getting money's my worth 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 money's... Q4a. Value received for City tax & fees 14.9% 15.3% 20.5% 21.2% 10.3% 9.6% 3.0% 1.8% 0.8% 0.6% 2.0% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 52     Q5. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the quality of the following services provided by the City of Meridian. (N=743) D o n ' t Excellent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q5a. Fire/rescue services 33.5% 21.9% 12.7% 6.2% 2.8% 0.9% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 20.9% Q5b. Fire prevention & public education 18.8% 19.0% 13.3% 9.8% 5.0% 4.6% 0.9% 0.7% 0.4% 0.4% 0.7% 26.4% Q5c. Police department/law enforcement 28.8% 21.1% 18.6% 8.7% 5.9% 3.8% 0.9% 1.2% 0.4% 0.3% 0.7% 9.6% Q5d. Code enforcement 13.3% 11.8% 12.2% 9.7% 7.4% 7.1% 2.4% 2.2% 0.9% 0.5% 2.7% 29.6% Q5e. Traffic enforcement 16.3% 14.3% 17.4% 11.7% 7.7% 9.2% 2.7% 3.1% 1.1% 0.9% 2.4% 13.3% Q5f. Planning & zoning services 9.0% 10.1% 9.7% 11.2% 7.9% 8.2% 3.4% 3.0% 2.6% 1.7% 4.8% 28.4% Q5g. Building permit services 8.9% 8.1% 6.3% 8.2% 5.9% 5.5% 2.2% 1.1% 1.3% 0.7% 2.2% 49.7% Q5h. Sewer services 20.7% 17.0% 18.4% 12.2% 7.1% 6.7% 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% 0.9% 0.4% 15.1% Q5i. Water services 22.1% 20.1% 19.0% 11.8% 7.0% 5.7% 1.5% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 0.9% 8.1% Q5j. Garbage/trash pick-up services 29.2% 24.9% 18.7% 10.6% 4.8% 4.7% 1.5% 0.7% 1.5% 0.3% 0.3% 2.8% Q5k. Recycling services 23.6% 20.2% 17.9% 11.3% 7.9% 5.9% 3.1% 2.7% 1.6% 0.5% 1.6% 3.6% Q5l. City parks 33.8% 26.2% 15.3% 10.8% 4.4% 2.7% 1.1% 0.9% 0.4% 0.3% 0.5% 3.5% Q5m. Recreation programs 19.1% 17.1% 14.3% 11.7% 5.5% 5.8% 1.3% 1.6% 0.7% 0.4% 0.7% 21.8% Q5n. Programs for youth 16.7% 14.8% 12.5% 11.0% 5.2% 5.0% 1.5% 1.2% 0.7% 0.3% 0.7% 30.4% Q5o. Communications 16.4% 13.6% 15.7% 11.4% 9.2% 7.4% 3.1% 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% 1.3% 17.5% Q5p. Passport Acceptance Agency 8.1% 4.0% 3.5% 3.1% 1.9% 1.7% 0.7% 0.5% 0.8% 0.3% 1.5% 73.9% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 53     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q5. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the quality of the following services provided by the City of Meridian. (without "don't know") (N=743) Excellent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q5a. Fire/rescue services 42.3% 27.7% 16.0% 7.8% 3.6% 1.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% Q5b. Fire prevention & public education 25.6% 25.8% 18.1% 13.3% 6.8% 6.2% 1.3% 0.9% 0.5% 0.5% 0.9% Q5c. Police department/ Law enforcement 31.8% 23.4% 20.5% 9.7% 6.5% 4.2% 1.0% 1.3% 0.4% 0.3% 0.7% Q5d. Code enforcement 18.9% 16.8% 17.4% 13.8% 10.5% 10.1% 3.4% 3.1% 1.3% 0.8% 3.8% Q5e. Traffic enforcement 18.8% 16.5% 20.0% 13.5% 8.9% 10.6% 3.1% 3.6% 1.2% 1.1% 2.8% Q5f. Planning & zoning services 12.6% 14.1% 13.5% 15.6% 11.1% 11.5% 4.7% 4.1% 3.6% 2.4% 6.8% Q5g. Building permit services 17.6% 16.0% 12.6% 16.3% 11.8% 11.0% 4.3% 2.1% 2.7% 1.3% 4.3% Q5h. Sewer services 24.4% 20.0% 21.7% 14.4% 8.4% 7.9% 0.6% 0.6% 0.3% 1.1% 0.5% Q5i. Water services 24.0% 21.8% 20.6% 12.9% 7.6% 6.1% 1.6% 1.5% 1.5% 1.3% 1.0% Q5j. Garbage/trash pick-up services 30.1% 25.6% 19.3% 10.9% 5.0% 4.8% 1.5% 0.7% 1.5% 0.3% 0.3% Q5k. Recycling services 24.4% 20.9% 18.6% 11.7% 8.2% 6.1% 3.2% 2.8% 1.7% 0.6% 1.7% Q5l. City parks 35.0% 27.2% 15.9% 11.2% 4.6% 2.8% 1.1% 1.0% 0.4% 0.3% 0.6% Q5m. Recreation programs 24.4% 21.9% 18.2% 15.0% 7.1% 7.4% 1.7% 2.1% 0.9% 0.5% 0.9% Q5n. Programs for youth 24.0% 21.3% 18.0% 15.9% 7.5% 7.2% 2.1% 1.7% 1.0% 0.4% 1.0% Q5o. Communications 19.9% 16.5% 19.1% 13.9% 11.1% 9.0% 3.8% 1.5% 1.6% 2.1% 1.6% Q5p. Passport Acceptance Agency 30.9% 15.5% 13.4% 11.9% 7.2% 6.7% 2.6% 2.1% 3.1% 1.0% 5.7% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 54     Q6. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Question 5 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next TWO years? Q6. Top choice Number Percent Fire/rescue services 51 6.9 % Fire prevention & public education 15 2.0 % Police department/law enforcement 129 17.4 % Code enforcement 20 2.7 % Traffic enforcement 60 8.1 % Planning & zoning services 180 24.2 % Building permit services 7 0.9 % Sewer services 9 1.2 % Water services 29 3.9 % Garbage/trash pick-up services 6 0.8 % Recycling services 38 5.1 % City parks 41 5.5 % Recreation programs 22 3.0 % Programs for youth 37 5.0 % Communications 15 2.0 % Passport Acceptance Agency 1 0.1 % None chosen 83 11.2 % Total 743 100.0 % Q6. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Question 5 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next TWO years? Q6. 2nd choice Number Percent Fire/rescue services 50 6.7 % Fire prevention & public education 25 3.4 % Police department/law enforcement 91 12.2 % Code enforcement 36 4.8 % Traffic enforcement 59 7.9 % Planning & zoning services 84 11.3 % Building permit services 33 4.4 % Sewer services 8 1.1 % Water services 20 2.7 % Garbage/trash pick-up services 15 2.0 % Recycling services 50 6.7 % City parks 57 7.7 % Recreation programs 40 5.4 % Programs for youth 47 6.3 % Communications 21 2.8 % Passport Acceptance Agency 2 0.3 % None chosen 105 14.1 % Total 743 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 55     Q6. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Question 5 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next TWO years? Q6. 3rd choice Number Percent Fire/rescue services 44 5.9 % Fire prevention & public education 17 2.3 % Police department/law enforcement 69 9.3 % Code enforcement 37 5.0 % Traffic enforcement 48 6.5 % Planning & zoning services 59 7.9 % Building permit services 23 3.1 % Sewer services 12 1.6 % Water services 21 2.8 % Garbage/trash pick-up services 16 2.2 % Recycling services 41 5.5 % City parks 75 10.1 % Recreation programs 54 7.3 % Programs for youth 50 6.7 % Communications 33 4.4 % Passport Acceptance Agency 6 0.8 % None chosen 138 18.6 % Total 743 100.0 % SUM OF TOP 3 CHOICES Q6. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Question 5 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next TWO years? (top 3) Q6. Sum of Top 3 Choices Number Percent Fire/rescue services 145 19.5 % Fire prevention & public education 57 7.7 % Police department/law enforcement 289 38.9 % Code enforcement 93 12.5 % Traffic enforcement 167 22.5 % Planning & zoning services 323 43.5 % Building permit services 63 8.5 % Sewer services 29 3.9 % Water services 70 9.4 % Garbage/trash pick-up services 37 5.0 % Recycling services 129 17.4 % City parks 173 23.3 % Recreation programs 116 15.6 % Programs for youth 134 18.0 % Communications 69 9.3 % Passport Acceptance Agency 9 1.2 % None chosen 83 11.2 % Total 1986 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 56     Q7. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following services provided by other agency partners. (N=743) E x c e l l - D o n ' t ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q7a. Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit 3.0% 1.9% 3.5% 4.8% 5.0% 7.1% 3.9% 6.3% 3.5% 2.8% 8.2% 49.9% Q7b. Animal control contracted with Idaho Humane Society 8.2% 7.0% 10.0% 10.1% 5.7% 6.9% 3.0% 2.2% 2.0% 0.8% 2.2% 42.1% Q7c. Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center 5.9% 5.8% 7.3% 5.9% 2.6% 3.2% 1.1% 0.4% 0.9% 0.0% 0.8% 66.1% Q7d. K-12 education by West Ada School District 10.2% 10.4% 14.8% 11.3% 7.1% 8.1% 3.9% 2.7% 2.8% 0.8% 3.4% 24.5% Q7e. Lakeview Golf Course 4.3% 3.2% 5.8% 4.8% 4.2% 3.8% 1.7% 0.8% 0.7% 0.4% 0.5% 69.7% Q7f. Library services by Meridian Library District 24.2% 18.8% 13.9% 11.7% 5.7% 4.2% 1.1% 0.8% 0.3% 0.1% 0.8% 18.4% Q7g. Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District 9.2% 7.3% 9.7% 7.3% 3.5% 4.6% 1.7% 0.9% 0.4% 0.7% 0.8% 54.0% Q7h. State highways operated by Idaho Transportation Department (Eagle Road, Meridian Road, & Chinden Boulevard) 5.4% 7.7% 13.9% 14.0% 9.7% 11.2% 7.3% 6.2% 4.8% 4.2% 9.2% 6.6% Q7i. All City roads operated by Ada County Highway District 4.8% 7.7% 12.9% 14.1% 13.2% 12.7% 6.5% 7.1% 5.0% 4.6% 7.0% 4.4% Q7j. Elections by Ada County clerk 15.9% 12.7% 18.3% 9.7% 6.1% 8.1% 2.2% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 1.7% 22.6% Q7k. Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance District 7.1% 7.1% 6.2% 4.8% 2.3% 2.6% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 68.9% Q7l. Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian area 13.3% 17.6% 18.7% 14.3% 6.3% 6.7% 2.3% 3.0% 3.2% 1.5% 3.4% 9.7% Q7m. Internet service by telecommunications provider in Meridian 9.4% 12.5% 16.0% 12.7% 7.8% 9.2% 5.7% 4.3% 5.1% 2.8% 5.8% 8.7% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 57     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q7. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following services provided by other agency partners. (without "don't know") (N=743) E x c e l l - ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q7a. Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit 5.9% 3.8% 7.0% 9.7% 9.9% 14.2% 7.8% 12.6% 7.0% 5.6% 16.4% Q7b. Animal control contracted with Idaho Humane Society 14.2% 12.1% 17.2% 17.4% 9.8% 11.9% 5.1% 3.7% 3.5% 1.4% 3.7% Q7c. Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center 17.5% 17.1% 21.4% 17.5% 7.5% 9.5% 3.2% 1.2% 2.8% 0.0% 2.4% Q7d. K-12 education by West Ada School District 13.5% 13.7% 19.6% 15.0% 9.4% 10.7% 5.2% 3.6% 3.7% 1.1% 4.5% Q7e. Lakeview Golf Course 14.2% 10.7% 19.1% 16.0% 13.8% 12.4% 5.8% 2.7% 2.2% 1.3% 1.8% Q7f. Library services by Meridian Library District 29.7% 23.1% 17.0% 14.4% 6.9% 5.1% 1.3% 1.0% 0.3% 0.2% 1.0% Q7g. Swimming pool by Western Ada Recreation District 19.9% 15.8% 21.1% 15.8% 7.6% 9.9% 3.8% 2.0% 0.9% 1.5% 1.8% Q7h. State highways operated by Idaho Transportation Department (Eagle Road, Meridian Road, & Chinden Boulevard) 5.8% 8.2% 14.8% 15.0% 10.4% 12.0% 7.8% 6.6% 5.2% 4.5% 9.8% Q7i. All City roads operated by Ada County Highway District 5.1% 8.0% 13.5% 14.8% 13.8% 13.2% 6.8% 7.5% 5.2% 4.8% 7.3% Q7j. Elections by Ada County clerk 20.5% 16.3% 23.7% 12.5% 7.8% 10.4% 2.8% 1.6% 1.2% 0.9% 2.3% Q7k. Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance District 22.9% 22.9% 19.9% 15.6% 7.4% 8.2% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.4% 0.9% Q7l. Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian area 14.8% 19.5% 20.7% 15.8% 7.0% 7.5% 2.5% 3.3% 3.6% 1.6% 3.7% Q7m. Internet service by telecommunications provider in Meridian 10.3% 13.7% 17.6% 13.9% 8.6% 10.0% 6.2% 4.7% 5.6% 3.1% 6.3% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 58     Q8. There are a variety of transportation infrastructure improvements needed along roads in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the following road-related aspects of our community you would like to see. (N=743) H i g h N o t p r i o r i - p r i o r i - D o n ' t ty 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ty know Q8a. Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 50.3% 12.1% 13.9% 9.3% 3.2% 3.5% 1.9% 1.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 1.9% Q8b. Intersection improvements 33.9% 15.6% 16.4% 12.8% 6.7% 7.0% 1.1% 1.3% 0.7% 0.5% 0.9% 3.0% Q8c. Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 27.7% 15.1% 16.2% 12.1% 7.5% 7.9% 2.8% 1.7% 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% 4.2% Q8d. Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 26.0% 14.9% 12.4% 13.5% 9.2% 9.3% 3.0% 2.0% 1.9% 1.6% 1.9% 4.4% Q8e. Street lights 18.7% 13.1% 16.4% 13.2% 9.6% 11.7% 3.4% 3.4% 1.9% 2.0% 2.2% 4.6% Q8f. Shared bike & pedestrian facilities (similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 31.2% 13.3% 12.0% 10.2% 6.6% 9.0% 3.8% 2.0% 1.9% 2.3% 3.6% 4.0% Q8g. Beautification/landscaping 12.0% 9.7% 16.8% 14.3% 9.6% 14.5% 5.0% 3.5% 3.9% 2.7% 4.3% 3.8% WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q8. There are a variety of transportation infrastructure improvements needed along roads in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the following road-related aspects of our community you would like to see. (without "don't know") (N=743) H i g h N o t p r i o r i - p r i o r i - ty 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ty Q8a. Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 51.3% 12.3% 14.1% 9.5% 3.3% 3.6% 1.9% 1.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% Q8b. Intersection improvements 35.0% 16.1% 16.9% 13.2% 6.9% 7.2% 1.1% 1.4% 0.7% 0.6% 1.0% Q8c. Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 28.9% 15.7% 16.9% 12.6% 7.9% 8.3% 2.9% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.5% Q8d. Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 27.2% 15.6% 13.0% 14.1% 9.6% 9.7% 3.1% 2.1% 2.0% 1.7% 2.0% Q8e. Street lights 19.6% 13.7% 17.2% 13.8% 10.0% 12.3% 3.5% 3.5% 2.0% 2.1% 2.3% Q8f. Shared bike & pedestrian facilities (similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 32.5% 13.9% 12.5% 10.7% 6.9% 9.4% 3.9% 2.1% 2.0% 2.4% 3.8% Q8g. Beautification/landscaping 12.4% 10.1% 17.5% 14.8% 9.9% 15.1% 5.2% 3.6% 4.1% 2.8% 4.5% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 59     Q9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed in Question 8 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? Q9. Top choice Number Percent Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 417 56.1 % Intersection improvements 61 8.2 % Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 38 5.1 % Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 32 4.3 % Street lights 20 2.7 % Shared bike & pedestrian facilities (similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 100 13.5 % Beautification/landscaping 10 1.3 % None chosen 65 8.7 % Total 743 100.0 % Q9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed in Question 8 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? Q9. 2nd choice Number Percent Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 73 9.8 % Intersection improvements 254 34.2 % Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 83 11.2 % Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 74 10.0 % Street lights 51 6.9 % Shared bike & pedestrian facilities (similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 101 13.6 % Beautification/landscaping 26 3.5 % None chosen 81 10.9 % Total 743 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 60     Q9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed in Question 8 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? Q9. 3rd choice Number Percent Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 60 8.1 % Intersection improvements 73 9.8 % Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 124 16.7 % Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 90 12.1 % Street lights 96 12.9 % Shared bike & pedestrian facilities (similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 118 15.9 % Beautification/landscaping 66 8.9 % None chosen 116 15.6 % Total 743 100.0 % SUM OF TOP 3 CHOICES Q9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed in Question 8 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? (top 3) Q9. Sum of Top 3 Choices Number Percent Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 550 74.0 % Intersection improvements 388 52.2 % Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 245 33.0 % Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 196 26.4 % Street lights 167 22.5 % Shared bike & pedestrian facilities (similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 319 42.9 % Beautification/landscaping 102 13.7 % None chosen 65 8.7 % Total 2032 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 61     Q10. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. (N=743) E x c e l l - D o n ' t ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q10a. Number of City parks 28.9% 16.0% 20.2% 14.3% 5.2% 3.8% 2.2% 1.1% 0.3% 0.3% 1.1% 6.7% Q10b. Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks 32.2% 25.2% 20.3% 10.6% 3.2% 2.0% 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% 4.6% Q10c. Quality of athletic fields 22.1% 16.3% 17.6% 10.2% 3.0% 3.8% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.7% 24.9% Q10d. Number of special events & festivals 13.1% 12.1% 16.3% 13.9% 8.7% 10.1% 2.8% 2.2% 0.9% 1.1% 0.9% 17.9% Q10e. Quality & variety of special events & festivals 13.3% 12.0% 15.7% 13.2% 10.2% 8.2% 2.2% 2.7% 1.5% 0.8% 0.8% 19.4% Q10f. Number of pathways for walking & biking 7.7% 7.9% 11.8% 14.4% 10.1% 13.5% 6.3% 8.3% 3.4% 1.5% 3.8% 11.3% Q10g. Quality of pathways for walking & biking 9.4% 10.6% 16.0% 13.9% 9.8% 11.0% 5.9% 3.5% 3.0% 1.2% 3.1% 12.5% Q10h. Availability of information about recreation programs & classes through social media, activity guides, email updates, website, etc 12.2% 11.0% 15.6% 13.2% 7.0% 11.4% 4.3% 3.9% 2.2% 1.1% 2.7% 15.3% Q10i. Availability of community center & gym facilities 7.9% 6.5% 9.3% 13.1% 7.7% 10.1% 4.4% 3.4% 2.8% 2.3% 3.6% 28.9% Q10j. Number of recreation programs & classes 7.5% 6.7% 9.3% 13.2% 8.7% 10.5% 2.6% 2.3% 2.0% 0.7% 2.2% 34.3% Q10k. Quality & variety of recreation programs & classes 6.6% 7.9% 8.6% 12.7% 7.3% 10.1% 1.7% 1.5% 0.8% 0.8% 1.7% 40.2% Q10l. Number of adult sports programs & sporting events 5.5% 5.9% 6.2% 10.4% 6.6% 9.4% 2.4% 2.2% 2.0% 1.7% 2.0% 45.6% Q10m. Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events 5.7% 5.9% 6.6% 9.6% 5.5% 7.3% 2.3% 2.0% 1.5% 0.9% 1.5% 51.3% Q10n. Availability of youth sports programs through partners, such as Police Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), & others 11.6% 10.9% 14.3% 9.7% 5.2% 5.4% 1.5% 1.5% 0.7% 0.1% 0.9% 38.2% Q10o. Quality of youth sports programs through partners, such as Police Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), & others 10.8% 12.0% 12.7% 9.0% 5.1% 4.7% 1.5% 0.7% 0.9% 0.7% 0.7% 41.3% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 62     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q10. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. (without "don't know") (N=743) E x c e l l - ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q10a. Number of City parks 31.0% 17.2% 21.6% 15.3% 5.6% 4.0% 2.3% 1.2% 0.3% 0.3% 1.2% Q10b. Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks 33.7% 26.4% 21.3% 11.1% 3.4% 2.1% 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% Q10c. Quality of athletic fields 29.4% 21.7% 23.5% 13.6% 3.9% 5.0% 1.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4% 0.9% Q10d. Number of special events & festivals 15.9% 14.8% 19.8% 16.9% 10.7% 12.3% 3.4% 2.6% 1.1% 1.3% 1.1% Q10e. Quality & variety of special events & festivals 16.5% 14.9% 19.5% 16.4% 12.7% 10.2% 2.7% 3.3% 1.8% 1.0% 1.0% Q10f. Number of pathways for walking & biking 8.6% 9.0% 13.4% 16.2% 11.4% 15.2% 7.1% 9.4% 3.8% 1.7% 4.2% Q10g. Quality of pathways for walking & biking 10.8% 12.2% 18.3% 15.8% 11.2% 12.6% 6.8% 4.0% 3.4% 1.4% 3.5% Q10h. Availability of information about recreation programs & classes through social media, activity guides, email updates, website, etc. 14.5% 13.0% 18.4% 15.6% 8.3% 13.5% 5.1% 4.6% 2.5% 1.3% 3.2% Q10i. Availability of community center & gym facilities 11.2% 9.1% 13.1% 18.4% 10.8% 14.2% 6.3% 4.7% 4.0% 3.2% 5.1% Q10j. Number of recreation programs & classes 11.5% 10.2% 14.1% 20.1% 13.3% 16.0% 3.9% 3.5% 3.1% 1.0% 3.3% Q10k. Quality & variety of recreation programs & classes 11.0% 13.3% 14.4% 21.2% 12.2% 16.9% 2.9% 2.5% 1.4% 1.4% 2.9% Q10l. Number of adult sports programs & sporting events 10.1% 10.9% 11.4% 19.1% 12.1% 17.3% 4.5% 4.0% 3.7% 3.2% 3.7% Q10m. Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events 11.6% 12.2% 13.5% 19.6% 11.3% 14.9% 4.7% 4.1% 3.0% 1.9% 3.0% Q10n. Availability of youth sports programs through partners, such as Police Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), & others 18.7% 17.6% 23.1% 15.7% 8.5% 8.7% 2.4% 2.4% 1.1% 0.2% 1.5% Q10o. Quality of youth sports programs through partners, such as Police Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), & others 18.3% 20.4% 21.6% 15.4% 8.7% 8.0% 2.5% 1.1% 1.6% 1.1% 1.1% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 63     Q11. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? Q11. Have you visited a City park in past 12 months Number Percent Yes, I have personally visited a City park in last year 592 79.7 % Yes, a household member has visited a City park in last year 68 9.2 % No 75 10.1 % Not provided 8 1.1 % Total 743 100.0 % Q12. Some neighborhoods have a great "sense of community." People know their neighbors form Neighborhood Watch Programs or have block parties and truly think of the others in the same area as "neighbors." Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means a "Very Strong Sense of Community" and 0 means "No Sense of Community at All," please rate the sense of community in your neighborhood. (N=743) V e r y N o s t r o n g s e n s e s e n s e o f o f c o m m u - D o n ' t comm... 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 nity at... know Q12a. "Sense of community" in your neighborhood 14.4% 9.7% 13.5% 14.9% 12.4% 11.2% 5.8% 5.1% 4.2% 1.9% 4.7% 2.3% WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q12. Some neighborhoods have a great "sense of community." People know their neighbors form Neighborhood Watch Programs or have block parties and truly think of the others in the same area as "neighbors." Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means a "Very Strong Sense of Community" and 0 means "No Sense of Community at All," please rate the sense of community in your neighborhood. (without "don't know") (N=743) V e r y s t r o n g N o s e n s e o f s e n s e o f c o m m u n - c o m m u n - ity 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ity at all Q12a. "Sense of community" in your neighborhood 14.7% 9.9% 13.8% 15.3% 12.7% 11.4% 5.9% 5.2% 4.3% 1.9% 4.8% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 64     Q13. Public safety has prioritized public outreach using social media, public presentations, citizen academies, and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following public safety services. (N=743) E x c e l l - D o n ' t ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q13a. Overall feeling of safety in City 25.2% 28.0% 24.5% 12.1% 3.2% 3.9% 1.1% 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 1.1% Q13b. Quality of local police protection 28.3% 27.2% 19.0% 8.5% 3.9% 3.6% 1.1% 0.5% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 7.1% Q13c. How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 16.7% 13.2% 7.1% 5.4% 1.9% 1.9% 0.7% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.1% 52.0% Q13d. Visibility of police in neighborhoods 14.7% 10.9% 16.3% 16.3% 10.9% 10.8% 4.0% 3.0% 3.1% 1.9% 2.4% 5.8% Q13e. Safety in City parks 20.3% 20.1% 20.1% 14.3% 3.9% 3.4% 1.9% 0.5% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 15.2% Q13f. Police safety education programs 10.5% 7.3% 9.4% 7.9% 3.5% 2.8% 1.2% 0.7% 0.7% 0.5% 0.7% 54.8% Q13g. Professionalism of employees responding to emergencies 20.5% 16.3% 9.3% 5.5% 1.3% 2.0% 1.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 42.3% Q13h. Overall quality of Fire Department 27.7% 20.2% 11.7% 4.7% 1.6% 1.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 31.4% Q13i. How quickly Fire Department responds to 911 emergencies 22.6% 14.0% 7.0% 2.3% 1.2% 0.8% 0.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 51.4% Q13j. Quality of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 23.0% 16.0% 9.3% 3.5% 1.1% 1.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 44.8% Q13k. Fire safety education programs 11.7% 8.7% 8.2% 6.5% 3.1% 2.4% 1.3% 0.5% 0.5% 0.1% 0.4% 56.4% Q13l. Current location of fire stations 28.4% 21.4% 18.3% 8.2% 4.2% 3.0% 0.8% 0.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 14.7% Q13m. ire Department public outreach 14.5% 7.9% 10.9% 6.5% 3.1% 4.0% 1.6% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.4% 48.6% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 65     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q13. Public safety has prioritized public outreach using social media, public presentations, citizen academies, and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following public safety services. (without "don't know") (N=743) E x c e l l e - nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q13a. Overall feeling of safety in City 25.4% 28.3% 24.8% 12.2% 3.3% 3.9% 1.1% 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Q13b. Quality of local police protection 30.4% 29.3% 20.4% 9.1% 4.2% 3.9% 1.2% 0.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% Q13c. How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 34.7% 27.5% 14.8% 11.2% 3.9% 3.9% 1.4% 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% 0.3% Q13d. Visibility of police in neighborhoods 15.6% 11.6% 17.3% 17.3% 11.6% 11.4% 4.3% 3.1% 3.3% 2.0% 2.6% Q13e. Safety in City parks 24.0% 23.7% 23.7% 16.8% 4.6% 4.0% 2.2% 0.6% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% Q13f. Police safety education programs 23.2% 16.1% 20.8% 17.6% 7.7% 6.3% 2.7% 1.5% 1.5% 1.2% 1.5% Q13g. Professionalism of employees responding to emergencies 35.4% 28.2% 16.1% 9.6% 2.3% 3.5% 1.9% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.9% Q13h. Overall quality of Fire Department 40.4% 29.4% 17.1% 6.9% 2.4% 1.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% Q13i. How quickly Fire Department responds to 911 emergencies 46.5% 28.8% 14.4% 4.7% 2.5% 1.7% 0.3% 0.8% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% Q13j. Quality of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 41.7% 29.0% 16.8% 6.3% 2.0% 2.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.7% Q13k. Fire safety education programs 26.9% 20.1% 18.8% 14.8% 7.1% 5.6% 3.1% 1.2% 1.2% 0.3% 0.9% Q13l. Current location of fire stations 33.3% 25.1% 21.5% 9.6% 4.9% 3.5% 0.9% 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% Q13m. ire Department public outreach 28.3% 15.4% 21.2% 12.6% 6.0% 7.9% 3.1% 1.3% 1.6% 1.8% 0.8% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 66     Q14. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City's efforts in the enforcement of the following codes and ordinances. (N=743) E x c e l l e - D o n ' t nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q14a. Weed abatement 6.7% 7.9% 12.1% 12.5% 8.1% 8.5% 4.4% 4.0% 3.4% 1.6% 4.6% 26.1% Q14b. Removal of graffiti 16.6% 14.8% 14.4% 9.3% 5.0% 3.9% 1.2% 0.8% 0.7% 0.3% 0.8% 32.3% Q14c. Abandoned/junk automobile removal 12.0% 10.4% 12.7% 8.3% 6.5% 5.7% 3.5% 2.0% 1.9% 1.1% 2.4% 33.6% Q14d. Clean-up of litter & debris on private property 7.9% 8.2% 10.9% 7.9% 8.1% 8.5% 4.0% 4.0% 2.6% 2.4% 3.5% 31.9% Q14e. Dilapidated houses or buildings 8.7% 6.9% 10.8% 10.6% 7.9% 10.2% 3.6% 2.8% 2.8% 2.4% 3.1% 30.0% Q14f. Illegal dumping 9.2% 8.7% 8.9% 8.7% 5.2% 5.4% 1.7% 1.2% 1.2% 1.1% 2.4% 46.2% WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q14. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the City's efforts in the enforcement of the following codes and ordinances. (without "don't know") (N=743) Excellent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q14a. Weed abatement 9.1% 10.7% 16.4% 16.9% 10.9% 11.5% 6.0% 5.5% 4.6% 2.2% 6.2% Q14b. Removal of graffiti 24.5% 21.9% 21.3% 13.7% 7.4% 5.8% 1.8% 1.2% 1.0% 0.4% 1.2% Q14c. Abandoned/junk automobile removal 18.1% 15.6% 19.1% 12.6% 9.7% 8.5% 5.3% 3.0% 2.8% 1.6% 3.7% Q14d. Clean-up of litter & debris on private property 11.7% 12.1% 16.0% 11.7% 11.9% 12.5% 5.9% 5.9% 3.8% 3.6% 5.1% Q14e. Dilapidated houses or buildings 12.5% 9.8% 15.4% 15.2% 11.3% 14.6% 5.2% 4.0% 4.0% 3.5% 4.4% Q14f. Illegal dumping 17.0% 16.3% 16.5% 16.3% 9.8% 10.0% 3.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.0% 4.5% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 67     Q15. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? Q15. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home Number Percent Yes 719 96.8 % No 6 0.8 % Don't know 18 2.4 % Total 743 100.0 % Q16. The Meridian Fire Department is working with other Treasure Valley Fire Departments which have produced cost savings and better effectiveness in exchange for group decision-making for certain department operations. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Strongly Agree" and 0 means "Strongly Disagree," please rate the level of cooperation and collaboration you would like to see happen. (N=743) S t r o n g - S t r o n g - l y l y d i s a g r - D o n ' t agree 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ee know Q16a. Our Fire Department should be completely independent in its operations 9.3% 3.2% 5.2% 3.5% 4.7% 10.0% 3.1% 7.7% 6.3% 5.4% 21.0% 20.6% Q16b. Our Fire Department should collaborate with other Fire Departments in operations 46.0% 16.6% 12.2% 5.8% 2.0% 3.0% 0.8% 0.4% 0.5% 0.1% 1.3% 11.2% Q16c. Our Fire Department should consolidate operations with other cities into one area department 7.1% 3.1% 4.4% 5.1% 3.9% 11.3% 3.8% 5.7% 4.8% 5.2% 22.9% 22.6% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 68     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q16. The Meridian Fire Department is working with other Treasure Valley Fire Departments which have produced cost savings and better effectiveness in exchange for group decision-making for certain department operations. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Strongly Agree" and 0 means "Strongly Disagree," please rate the level of cooperation and collaboration you would like to see happen. (without "don't know") (N=743) S t r o n g - S t r o n g - l y l y d i s a g r - agree 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ee Q16a. Our Fire Department should be completely independent in its operations 11.7% 4.1% 6.6% 4.4% 5.9% 12.5% 3.9% 9.7% 8.0% 6.8% 26.4% Q16b. Our Fire Department should collaborate with other Fire Departments in operations 51.8% 18.6% 13.8% 6.5% 2.3% 3.3% 0.9% 0.5% 0.6% 0.2% 1.5% Q16c. Our Fire Department should consolidate operations with other cities into one area department 9.2% 4.0% 5.7% 6.6% 5.0% 14.6% 4.9% 7.3% 6.3% 6.8% 29.6% Q17. In general, would you favor or oppose a city ordinance making it illegal within the City of Meridian to deny goods, services, housing, or employment to someone because he or she is gay, bisexual, or transgender? Q17. Would you favor or oppose a City ordinance making it illegal within City of Meridian to deny goods, services, housing, or employment to someone because he or she is gay, bisexual, or transgender Number Percent Favor 289 38.9 % Oppose 360 48.5 % Not sure 94 12.7 % Total 743 100.0 % Q18. Under state law, smoking is prohibited in restaurants and most workplaces, but allowed in bars and small businesses with less than 5 employees. In general, would you favor or oppose a city ordinance prohibiting smoking within the City of Meridian in all indoor public places, including bars, and small businesses? Q18. Would you favor or oppose a City ordinance prohibiting smoking within City of Meridian in all indoor public places Number Percent Favor 519 69.9 % Oppose 179 24.1 % Not sure 45 6.1 % Total 743 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 69     Q19. The City uses a variety of methods to communicate with the public, including its website, social media such as Nextdoor, Facebook and Twitter, traditional media such as newspapers, radio, and television, and a bi-weekly newsletter. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following communication services. (N=743) E x c e l l - D o n ' t ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q19a. Effectiveness of City communications with the public 16.4% 11.4% 16.3% 16.2% 7.9% 9.2% 3.2% 2.3% 1.3% 0.5% 1.7% 13.5% Q19b. Opportunities for public involvement in local decision making 12.1% 8.3% 12.4% 13.6% 9.0% 9.0% 2.8% 3.2% 2.2% 1.5% 2.8% 23.0% Q19c. Quality of www.meridiancity.org 13.5% 12.8% 18.8% 10.5% 6.9% 5.9% 2.6% 2.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.5% 24.4% Q19d. Usefulness of online services available on City of Meridian's website (bill pay/class registration) 16.3% 14.0% 15.6% 10.9% 3.6% 4.4% 1.6% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 1.3% 29.3% Q19e. Quality of information about City programs & services 12.4% 13.5% 17.5% 14.3% 7.4% 7.8% 1.5% 2.6% 1.3% 0.5% 1.7% 19.5% WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q19. The City uses a variety of methods to communicate with the public, including its website, social media such as Nextdoor, Facebook and Twitter, traditional media such as newspapers, radio, and television, and a bi-weekly newsletter. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following communication services. (without "don't know") (N=743) E x c e l l - ent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q19a. Effectiveness of City communications with the public 19.0% 13.2% 18.8% 18.7% 9.2% 10.6% 3.7% 2.6% 1.6% 0.6% 2.0% Q19b. Opportunities for public involvement in local decision making 15.7% 10.8% 16.1% 17.7% 11.7% 11.7% 3.7% 4.2% 2.8% 1.9% 3.7% Q19c. Quality of www.meridiancity.org 17.8% 16.9% 24.9% 13.9% 9.1% 7.8% 3.4% 3.2% 0.5% 0.5% 2.0% Q19d. Usefulness of online services available on City of Meridian's website (bill pay/class registration) 23.0% 19.8% 22.1% 15.4% 5.1% 6.3% 2.3% 1.7% 1.3% 1.0% 1.9% Q19e. Quality of information about City programs & services 15.4% 16.7% 21.7% 17.7% 9.2% 9.7% 1.8% 3.2% 1.7% 0.7% 2.2% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 70     Q20. Where do you currently get information about Meridian's services and programs? Q20. Where do you get information about Meridian's services & programs Number Percent City website 358 48.2 % Social media (Nextdoor, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) 347 46.7 % Television/news 352 47.4 % Flyers in utility bills 366 49.3 % Information booklets/City publications 127 17.1 % Newspaper 201 27.1 % Radio 150 20.2 % Emails from City 152 20.5 % Events such as Coffee with Mayor, Town Halls 42 5.7 % Other 34 4.6 % Total 2129 Q20. Other source Q20. Other source Number Percent Church affiliation 1 3.0 % City meetings 1 3.0 % City staff, community organizations 1 3.0 % Facebook; Nextdoor.com 1 3.0 % Family and Friends also living in the Meridian area 1 3.0 % Friends, family 1 3.0 % Google 1 3.0 % Nextdoor.com 5 15.2 % Schools 1 3.0 % Social interactions 1 3.0 % Tully next door 1 3.0 % call the city utility company 1 3.0 % library 1 3.0 % neighborhood internet 1 3.0 % neighbors 2 6.1 % signs posted around the community 1 3.0 % websites 1 3.0 % word of mouth 11 33.3 % Total 33 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 71     Q21. If the City were to expand to another communication platform, from which new platform would you prefer to receive information about Meridian's services and programs? Q21. From which new platform would you prefer to receive information about Meridian's services & programs Number Percent Texts 115 15.5 % Mobile applications 239 32.2 % None of above 350 47.1 % Other source 39 5.2 % Total 743 100.0 % Q21. Other source Q21. Other source Number Percent email 7 23.3 % mail 6 20.0 % City should have an online map where you can sign up for notifications 1 3.3 % mailings to our mailbox 1 3.3 % fliers 1 3.3 % USPS POSTAL MAIL 1 3.3 % Mail, newspaper 1 3.3 % New letters sent to home owners 1 3.3 % News, paper correspondence 1 3.3 % Direct communication with the mayor and other leader 1 3.3 % An additional new page on the city website 1 3.3 % newspaper 1 3.3 % More outreach on TV news 1 3.3 % Social media 1 3.3 % MAILING/PUBLIC POSTING/MESSAGE BOARDS 1 3.3 % TV and radio 1 3.3 % TV NEWS 1 3.3 % TV 1 3.3 % email messages 1 3.3 % Total 30 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 72     Q22. Did you visit Downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work? Q22. Did you visit Downtown Meridian at least once during past year for a purpose other than work Number Percent Yes 650 87.5 % No 80 10.8 % Don't remember 13 1.7 % Total 743 100.0 % Q22a. (If YES to Question 22) When you think about your visits to Downtown over the last year, how satisfied were you with your overall experience? Q22a. How satisfied were you with your overall experience Number Percent Very dissatisfied 31 4.8 % Somewhat dissatisfied 53 8.2 % Neutral 117 18.0 % Somewhat satisfied 237 36.5 % Very satisfied 208 32.0 % Not provided 4 0.6 % Total 650 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 73     Q23. The City of Meridian is looking to foster development of vibrant Downtown entertainment options in the future to meet the needs of various generations. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following types of nightlife entertainment options you believe would positively contribute to a vibrant Downtown. (N=743) E x c e l l e - D o n ' t nt 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor know Q23a. Restaurants 45.4% 17.5% 14.0% 8.1% 2.4% 3.0% 1.5% 1.6% 0.4% 0.7% 0.9% 4.6% Q23b. Bars & nightclubs 13.2% 4.3% 8.7% 10.5% 6.9% 10.2% 5.1% 4.8% 4.7% 4.2% 10.2% 17.1% Q23c. Live music venues 26.6% 14.0% 14.9% 9.7% 5.7% 7.7% 1.9% 2.2% 1.9% 1.2% 2.7% 11.6% Q23d. Live event venues (i.e., comedy club/magician) 20.1% 12.4% 16.0% 10.4% 7.5% 6.7% 2.2% 3.2% 1.7% 1.9% 3.6% 14.3% Q23e. Performance art (plays/ opera/symphony) 24.1% 14.8% 13.9% 10.2% 5.9% 6.7% 2.4% 2.2% 1.5% 1.2% 3.8% 13.3% Q23f. Movie theatre 24.2% 13.6% 14.5% 10.9% 6.3% 9.2% 2.7% 2.0% 1.6% 1.6% 3.5% 9.8% Q23g. Brewer/wine tasting rooms 20.7% 11.6% 11.0% 9.8% 6.7% 7.0% 3.1% 3.8% 2.8% 1.9% 7.4% 14.1% Q23h. Pool hall/arcade/bingo 8.3% 6.5% 8.5% 8.7% 7.4% 11.8% 5.1% 5.4% 5.7% 5.4% 8.5% 18.7% Q23i. Other 53.4% 10.3% 6.9% 5.2% 0.0% 8.6% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 10.3% 0.0% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 74     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q23. The City of Meridian is looking to foster development of vibrant Downtown entertainment options in the future to meet the needs of various generations. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Excellent" and 0 means "Poor," please rate the following types of nightlife entertainment options you believe would positively contribute to a vibrant Downtown. (without "don't know") (N=743) Excellent 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor Q23a. Restaurants 47.5% 18.3% 14.7% 8.5% 2.5% 3.1% 1.6% 1.7% 0.4% 0.7% 1.0% Q23b. Bars & nightclubs 15.9% 5.2% 10.6% 12.7% 8.3% 12.3% 6.2% 5.8% 5.7% 5.0% 12.3% Q23c. Live music venues 30.1% 15.8% 16.9% 11.0% 6.4% 8.7% 2.1% 2.4% 2.1% 1.4% 3.0% Q23d. Live event venues (i.e., comedy club/magician) 23.4% 14.4% 18.7% 12.1% 8.8% 7.8% 2.5% 3.8% 2.0% 2.2% 4.2% Q23e. Performance art (plays/ opera/symphony) 27.8% 17.1% 16.0% 11.8% 6.8% 7.8% 2.8% 2.5% 1.7% 1.4% 4.3% Q23f. Movie theatre 26.9% 15.1% 16.1% 12.1% 7.0% 10.1% 3.0% 2.2% 1.8% 1.8% 3.9% Q23g. Brewer/wine tasting rooms 24.1% 13.5% 12.9% 11.4% 7.8% 8.2% 3.6% 4.4% 3.3% 2.2% 8.6% Q23h. Pool hall/arcade/bingo 10.3% 7.9% 10.4% 10.8% 9.1% 14.6% 6.3% 6.6% 7.0% 6.6% 10.4% Q23i. Other 53.4% 10.3% 6.9% 5.2% 0.0% 8.6% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 10.3% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 75     Q23. Other Q23i. Other Number Percent Additional housing 1 1.8 % Affordable 1 1.8 % An open space for indoor/outdoor performances 1 1.8 % Coffee shop/bookstore 1 1.8 % Costco 1 1.8 % Cultural events for teens 1 1.8 % Distinctive feature like the Boise Green Belt 1 1.8 % Family friendly events and easy access to parking for events 1 1.8 % Farmer's Market 5 8.8 % Former weekly summer event 1 1.8 % Gun shops/shooting ranges 1 1.8 % Gun/Archery range 1 1.8 % International zone/area with markets 1 1.8 % LOCAL FOOD/DRINK 1 1.8 % More walkable business in downtown area 1 1.8 % Parking or public transit 1 1.8 % Public programs and public information after work 1 1.8 % Retail stores 1 1.8 % Roller skating 1 1.8 % Shopping centers 1 1.8 % Shopping, sporting events, public rapid transportation 1 1.8 % Shops, museums 1 1.8 % Something for the youth 1 1.8 % Sporting arena/locale 1 1.8 % The government shouldn't be involved 1 1.8 % There needs to be more to on the weekends 1 1.8 % Trader Joes or Whole Foods market 1 1.8 % Unique shops 1 1.8 % baseball 1 1.8 % bookstore 1 1.8 % boutique shops 1 1.8 % city band 1 1.8 % city market 1 1.8 % dance studio 1 1.8 % dinner theater 1 1.8 % fountain, benches 1 1.8 % get rid of speedway 1 1.8 % hockey rink 1 1.8 % indoor shooting range 1 1.8 % kids museum/discovery center 1 1.8 % more frequent community entertainment/activity opportunities 1 1.8 % more modern buildings and a better shopping environment 1 1.8 % outdoor parks that is open after dark 1 1.8 % outdoor pavilion 1 1.8 % parking 2 3.5 % parks 1 1.8 % quality dining 1 1.8 % rec center/exercise area 1 1.8 % rollerskating rink 1 1.8 % sports complex 1 1.8 % unique stores for shopping 1 1.8 % walking/biking paths connecting neighborhoods 1 1.8 % Total 57 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 76     Q24. Which TWO of the options listed in Question 23 above do you think the City should MOST FOCUS their attention on to bring to Downtown over the next THREE years? Q24. Top choice Number Percent Restaurants 297 40.0 % Bars & nightclubs 23 3.1 % Live music venues 137 18.4 % Live event venues (i.e., comedy club/magician) 47 6.3 % Performance art (plays/opera/symphony) 84 11.3 % Movie theatre 27 3.6 % Brewer/wine tasting rooms 40 5.4 % Pool hall/arcade/bingo 11 1.5 % Other 29 3.9 % None chosen 48 6.5 % Total 743 100.0 % Q24. Which TWO of the options listed in Question 23 above do you think the City should MOST FOCUS their attention on to bring to Downtown over the next THREE years? Q24. 2nd choice Number Percent Restaurants 110 14.8 % Bars & nightclubs 26 3.5 % Live music venues 114 15.3 % Live event venues (i.e., comedy club/magician) 102 13.7 % Performance art (plays/opera/symphony) 121 16.3 % Movie theatre 75 10.1 % Brewer/wine tasting rooms 86 11.6 % Pool hall/arcade/bingo 17 2.3 % Other 14 1.9 % None chosen 78 10.5 % Total 743 100.0 % SUM OF TOP 2 CHOICES Q24. Which TWO of the options listed in Question 23 above do you think the City should MOST FOCUS their attention on to bring to Downtown over the next THREE years? (top 2) Q24. Sum of Top 2 Choices Number Percent Restaurants 407 54.8 % Bars & nightclubs 49 6.6 % Live music venues 251 33.8 % Live event venues (i.e., comedy club/magician) 149 20.1 % Performance art (plays/opera/symphony) 205 27.6 % Movie theatre 102 13.7 % Brewer/wine tasting rooms 126 17.0 % Pool hall/arcade/bingo 28 3.8 % Other 43 5.8 % None chosen 48 6.5 % Total 1408 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 77     Q25. Meridian continues to grow, and there has been an indication that preserving farmland is important to the community. One way to preserve farmland would be by voter initiative to enact a levy to purchase farmland in order to preserve it for agricultural purposes. In general, would you be willing to support a levy, similar to the Boise Foothills Levy for this purpose? Q25. Would you be willing to support a levy similar to Boise Foothills Levy Number Percent Yes 369 49.7 % No 204 27.5 % Not sure 170 22.9 % Total 743 100.0 % Q26. In general, would you favor or oppose allowing residents of a city the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax (local option tax) increase to provide funding for identified infrastructure improvements in the community? Q26. Would you favor or oppose allowing City residents the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax increase to provide funding identified infrastructure improvements in community Number Percent Favor 315 42.4 % Oppose 275 37.0 % Not sure 153 20.6 % Total 743 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 78     Q27. The City of Meridian has taken the position to save money for future improvements and not use bonds for new facilities. If the City were to place a bond measure on the ballot for $10 million that could cost homeowners approximately .91 cents per month for a home with an assessed value of $100 thousand dollars, in general would you support this bond for the following items using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Highly Likely" and 0 means "Very Unlikely." (N=743) V e r y H i g h l y u n l i k e - D o n ' t likely 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ly know Q27a. Building a multipurpose center that would include flexible space for meetings & conferences in Downtown 15.3% 7.1% 10.0% 6.6% 7.8% 9.3% 3.9% 4.6% 2.6% 4.0% 21.1% 7.7% Q27b. Constructing Linder Road Overpass 29.6% 8.2% 8.1% 8.1% 4.7% 7.7% 2.2% 3.6% 3.6% 2.7% 13.3% 8.2% Q27c. Building an indoor aquatics center 21.7% 7.3% 9.4% 6.1% 7.0% 9.3% 3.6% 3.4% 4.7% 4.3% 17.0% 6.3% Q27d. Building a performing arts center 20.6% 10.5% 10.9% 9.6% 7.7% 10.0% 3.4% 2.8% 2.7% 2.6% 12.2% 7.1% Q27e. Adding more bike lanes & pathways 26.4% 10.4% 10.9% 7.7% 5.7% 7.8% 4.3% 3.6% 2.4% 3.9% 11.4% 5.5% Q27f. Providing more public transportation options 21.7% 10.9% 12.5% 7.9% 5.5% 10.0% 4.6% 3.5% 2.4% 2.8% 12.1% 6.1% Q27g. Developing a pathway along rail corridor 20.6% 9.3% 10.5% 8.3% 5.7% 7.8% 4.2% 2.7% 3.5% 2.8% 12.2% 12.4% Q27h. Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion 14.1% 6.3% 11.7% 9.7% 8.6% 10.9% 4.0% 3.5% 2.4% 2.7% 10.9% 15.1% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 79     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q27. The City of Meridian has taken the position to save money for future improvements and not use bonds for new facilities. If the City were to place a bond measure on the ballot for $10 million that could cost homeowners approximately .91 cents per month for a home with an assessed value of $100 thousand dollars, in general would you support this bond for the following items using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "Highly Likely" and 0 means "Very Unlikely." (without "don't know") (N=743) V e r y H i g h l y u n l i k e - likely 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ly Q27a. Building a multipurpose center that would include flexible space for meetings & conferences in Downtown 16.6% 7.7% 10.8% 7.1% 8.5% 10.1% 4.2% 5.0% 2.8% 4.4% 22.9% Q27b. Constructing Linder Road Overpass 32.3% 8.9% 8.8% 8.8% 5.1% 8.4% 2.3% 4.0% 4.0% 2.9% 14.5% Q27c. Building an indoor aquatics center 23.1% 7.8% 10.1% 6.5% 7.5% 9.9% 3.9% 3.6% 5.0% 4.6% 18.1% Q27d. Building a performing arts center 22.2% 11.3% 11.7% 10.3% 8.3% 10.7% 3.6% 3.0% 2.9% 2.8% 13.2% Q27e. Adding more bike lanes & pathways 27.9% 11.0% 11.5% 8.1% 6.0% 8.3% 4.6% 3.8% 2.6% 4.1% 12.1% Q27f. Providing more public transportation options 23.1% 11.6% 13.3% 8.5% 5.9% 10.6% 4.9% 3.7% 2.6% 3.0% 12.9% Q27g. Developing a pathway along rail corridor 23.5% 10.6% 12.0% 9.5% 6.5% 8.9% 4.8% 3.1% 4.0% 3.2% 14.0% Q27h. Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion 16.6% 7.4% 13.8% 11.4% 10.1% 12.8% 4.8% 4.1% 2.9% 3.2% 12.8% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 80     Q28. Which TWO of the options listed in Question 27 above would you be MOST WILLING to support, if any? Q28. Top choice Number Percent Building a multipurpose center that would include flexible space for meetings & conferences in Downtown 66 8.9 % Constructing Linder Road Overpass 190 25.6 % Building an indoor aquatics center 92 12.4 % Building a performing arts center 57 7.7 % Adding more bike lanes & pathways 119 16.0 % Providing more public transportation options 74 10.0 % Developing a pathway along rail corridor 26 3.5 % Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion 49 6.6 % None chosen 70 9.4 % Total 743 100.0 % Q28. Which TWO of the options listed in Question 27 above would you be MOST WILLING to support, if any? Q28. 2nd choice Number Percent Building a multipurpose center that would include flexible space for meetings & conferences in Downtown 44 5.9 % Constructing Linder Road Overpass 80 10.8 % Building an indoor aquatics center 75 10.1 % Building a performing arts center 103 13.9 % Adding more bike lanes & pathways 94 12.7 % Providing more public transportation options 95 12.8 % Developing a pathway along rail corridor 72 9.7 % Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion 67 9.0 % None chosen 113 15.2 % Total 743 100.0 % SUM OF TOP 2 CHOICES Q28. Which TWO of the options listed in Question 27 above would you be MOST WILLING to support, if any? (top 2) Q28. Sum of Top 2 Choices Number Percent Building a multipurpose center that would include flexible space for meetings & conferences in Downtown 110 14.8 % Constructing Linder Road Overpass 270 36.3 % Building an indoor aquatics center 167 22.5 % Building a performing arts center 160 21.5 % Adding more bike lanes & pathways 213 28.7 % Providing more public transportation options 169 22.7 % Developing a pathway along rail corridor 98 13.2 % Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion 116 15.6 % None chosen 70 9.4 % Total 1373 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 81     Q29. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the importance of the following community issues. (N=743) H i g h l y N o t D o n ' t priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority know Q29a. Roads/traffic/ transportation 60.8% 17.0% 11.4% 4.8% 2.3% 0.9% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 1.9% Q29b. Growth/development 37.3% 16.6% 14.3% 9.7% 5.9% 4.7% 1.1% 1.5% 1.2% 1.1% 1.9% 4.8% Q29c. Education/schools 52.4% 16.8% 10.1% 6.7% 3.1% 3.4% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.1% 0.9% 4.0% Q29d. Homelessness/social services 15.2% 10.0% 14.8% 12.4% 10.8% 12.0% 4.3% 4.3% 3.2% 2.4% 4.6% 6.1% Q29e. AirBnB/vacation rentals 1.7% 2.6% 3.5% 5.9% 6.7% 11.6% 7.7% 7.3% 7.8% 9.7% 22.9% 12.7% Q29f. Affordable housing 17.2% 11.0% 11.7% 12.0% 7.5% 12.5% 4.6% 5.5% 3.6% 3.1% 6.9% 4.3% Q29g. Jobs/economic development 32.2% 20.3% 16.2% 11.8% 5.4% 5.8% 1.1% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 1.3% 5.2% Q29h. Public transportation 24.0% 13.3% 13.1% 11.2% 7.1% 10.2% 4.2% 3.5% 2.6% 2.2% 3.8% 5.0% Q29i. Downtown redevelopment 17.2% 12.1% 13.5% 17.0% 9.4% 11.2% 2.7% 3.1% 2.3% 1.7% 3.8% 6.1% Q29j. Pathway/sidewalk connections 22.3% 14.5% 16.6% 11.8% 8.3% 9.2% 3.5% 2.2% 2.2% 1.2% 3.1% 5.1% Q29k. City tax burden 13.5% 11.0% 14.4% 12.4% 6.7% 14.0% 2.7% 3.4% 1.9% 1.5% 2.7% 15.9% Q29l. Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 18.4% 14.7% 14.0% 11.3% 8.5% 10.9% 3.2% 3.0% 1.9% 1.2% 4.0% 8.9% Q29m. Access to mental health services 21.7% 10.6% 12.4% 12.4% 6.1% 11.6% 2.8% 3.2% 2.6% 2.6% 4.8% 9.3% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 82     WITHOUT DON’T KNOW Q29. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "High Priority" and 0 means "No Priority," please rate the importance of the following community issues. (without "don't know") (N=743) H i g h l y N o t priority 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 priority Q29a. Roads/traffic/ transportation 62.0% 17.3% 11.7% 4.9% 2.3% 1.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% Q29b. Growth/development 39.2% 17.4% 15.0% 10.2% 6.2% 5.0% 1.1% 1.6% 1.3% 1.1% 2.0% Q29c. Education/schools 54.6% 17.5% 10.5% 7.0% 3.2% 3.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.1% 1.0% Q29d. Homelessness/social services 16.2% 10.6% 15.8% 13.2% 11.5% 12.8% 4.6% 4.6% 3.4% 2.6% 4.9% Q29e. AirBnB/vacation rentals 2.0% 2.9% 4.0% 6.8% 7.7% 13.3% 8.8% 8.3% 8.9% 11.1% 26.2% Q29f. Affordable housing 18.0% 11.5% 12.2% 12.5% 7.9% 13.1% 4.8% 5.8% 3.8% 3.2% 7.2% Q29g. Jobs/economic development 33.9% 21.4% 17.0% 12.5% 5.7% 6.1% 1.1% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 1.4% Q29h. Public transportation 25.2% 14.0% 13.7% 11.8% 7.5% 10.8% 4.4% 3.7% 2.7% 2.3% 4.0% Q29i. Downtown redevelopment 18.3% 12.9% 14.3% 18.1% 10.0% 11.9% 2.9% 3.3% 2.4% 1.9% 4.0% Q29j. Pathway/sidewalk connections 23.5% 15.3% 17.4% 12.5% 8.8% 9.6% 3.7% 2.3% 2.3% 1.3% 3.3% Q29k. City tax burden 16.0% 13.1% 17.1% 14.7% 8.0% 16.6% 3.2% 4.0% 2.2% 1.8% 3.2% Q29l. Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 20.2% 16.1% 15.4% 12.4% 9.3% 12.0% 3.5% 3.2% 2.1% 1.3% 4.4% Q29m. Access to mental health services 23.9% 11.7% 13.6% 13.6% 6.7% 12.8% 3.1% 3.6% 2.8% 2.8% 5.3% City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 83 Q30. Which THREE of the Priorities listed in Question 29 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next THREE years? Q30. Top choice Number Percent Roads/traffic/transportation 341 45.9 % Growth/development 53 7.1 % Education/schools 134 18.0 % Homelessness/social services 12 1.6 % AirBnB/vacation rentals 2 0.3 % Affordable housing 22 3.0 % Jobs/economic development 23 3.1 % Public transportation 38 5.1 % Downtown redevelopment 17 2.3 % Pathway/sidewalk connections 31 4.2 % City tax burden 10 1.3 % Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 14 1.9 % Access to mental health services 14 1.9 % None chosen 32 4.3 % Total 743 100.0 % Q30. Which THREE of the Priorities listed in Question 29 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next THREE years? Q30. 2nd choice Number Percent Roads/traffic/transportation 115 15.5 % Growth/development 149 20.1 % Education/schools 128 17.2 % Homelessness/social services 26 3.5 % AirBnB/vacation rentals 2 0.3 % Affordable housing 39 5.2 % Jobs/economic development 69 9.3 % Public transportation 34 4.6 % Downtown redevelopment 29 3.9 % Pathway/sidewalk connections 32 4.3 % City tax burden 20 2.7 % Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 26 3.5 % Access to mental health services 34 4.6 % None chosen 40 5.4 % Total 743 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 84     Q30. Which THREE of the Priorities listed in Question 29 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next THREE years? Q30. 3rd choice Number Percent Roads/traffic/transportation 63 8.5 % Growth/development 73 9.8 % Education/schools 112 15.1 % Homelessness/social services 23 3.1 % AirBnB/vacation rentals 5 0.7 % Affordable housing 40 5.4 % Jobs/economic development 106 14.3 % Public transportation 47 6.3 % Downtown redevelopment 48 6.5 % Pathway/sidewalk connections 70 9.4 % City tax burden 37 5.0 % Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 21 2.8 % Access to mental health services 34 4.6 % None chosen 64 8.6 % Total 743 100.0 % SUM OF TOP 3 CHOICES Q30. Which THREE of the Priorities listed in Question 29 above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from City leaders over the next THREE years? (top 3) Q30. Sum of Top 3 Choices Number Percent Roads/traffic/transportation 519 69.9 % Growth/development 275 37.0 % Education/schools 374 50.3 % Homelessness/social services 61 8.2 % AirBnB/vacation rentals 9 1.2 % Affordable housing 101 13.6 % Jobs/economic development 198 26.6 % Public transportation 119 16.0 % Downtown redevelopment 94 12.7 % Pathway/sidewalk connections 133 17.9 % City tax burden 67 9.0 % Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 61 8.2 % Access to mental health services 82 11.0 % None chosen 32 4.3 % Total 2125 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 85     Q32. Your gender: Q32. Your gender Number Percent Male 363 48.9 % Female 373 50.2 % Not provided 7 0.9 % Total 743 100.0 % Q33. What is your age? Q33. Your age Number Percent 18-34 144 19.4 % 35-44 145 19.5 % 45-54 150 20.2 % 55-64 151 20.3 % 65+ 142 19.1 % Not provided 11 1.5 % Total 743 100.0 % Q34. Which of the following best describes the home in which you live? Q34. What best describes the home in which you live Number Percent A manufactured trailer or mobile home 3 0.4 % An apartment 15 2.0 % A condominium 1 0.1 % Townhouse or duplex 25 3.4 % A detached single-family house 687 92.5 % Other 5 0.7 % Not provided 7 0.9 % Total 743 100.0 % Q34. Other Q34. Other Number Percent A tiny house 1 20.0 % House 1 20.0 % two story home 1 20.0 % family house 1 20.0 % home subdivision 1 20.0 % Total 5 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 86     Q35. Do you own or rent your home? Q35. Do you own or rent your home Number Percent Own 615 82.8 % Rent 115 15.5 % Don't know 7 0.9 % Other 6 0.8 % Total 743 100.0 % Q35. Other Q35. Other Number Percent Live with family 3 50.0 % Live with parents 1 16.7 % It is my parents' home 1 16.7 % my dad's house 1 16.7 % Total 6 100.0 % Q36. How many years have you lived in Meridian? Q36. How many years have you lived in Meridian Number Percent 5 or less 232 32.4 % 6 to 10 136 19.0 % 11 to 15 125 17.5 % 16 to 20 95 13.3 % 21 to 30 90 12.6 % 31+ 37 5.2 % Total 715 100.0 % Q36. How many months have you lived in Meridian? Q36. How many months have you lived in Meridian Number Percent 0 80 18.1 % 1 27 6.1 % 2 33 7.5 % 3 37 8.4 % 4 24 5.4 % 5 36 8.2 % 6 57 12.9 % 7 22 5.0 % 8 23 5.2 % 9 45 10.2 % 10 26 5.9 % 11 27 6.1 % 12+ 4 0.9 % Total 441 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 87     Q37. Including yourself, how many people in your household are: Mean Sum number 2.84 2036 Under age 5 0.20 146 Ages 5-9 0.23 163 Ages 10-14 0.26 187 Ages 15-17 0.16 116 Ages 18+ 1.98 1424 Q38. Does your household have a dog? Q38. Does your household have a dog Number Percent Yes 371 49.9 % No 344 46.3 % Not provided 28 3.8 % Total 743 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 88     Q38a. (If YES to Question 38) How many dogs do you have in your household? Q38a. How many dogs do you have in your household Number Percent One 222 59.8 % Two 129 34.8 % Three 18 4.9 % Four or more 2 0.5 % Total 371 100.0 % Q38b. (If YES to Question 38) Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually? Q38b. Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually Number Percent Yes 314 84.6 % No 54 14.6 % Not provided 3 0.8 % Total 371 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 89     Q39. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? Q39. Your current employment status Number Percent Employed full time 368 49.5 % Employed part time 32 4.3 % Self-employed 68 9.2 % Not employed outside home, a homemaker 38 5.1 % Retired 189 25.4 % A full-time student, not working 6 0.8 % A student working full time 7 0.9 % A student working part time 6 0.8 % Not employed due to a disability 13 1.7 % Not employed, but seeking work 8 1.1 % Not employed, but not seeking work 4 0.5 % Other 2 0.3 % Not provided 2 0.3 % Total 743 100.0 % Q39. Other Q39. Other Number Percent retired working part time 2 100.0 % Total 2 100.0 % Q40. What is the approximate total annual family income of all members of your household? Q40. Total annual family income of all members of your household Number Percent Less than $20K 16 2.2 % $20K-$34,999 52 7.0 % $35K-$49,999 60 8.1 % $50K-$74,999 136 18.3 % $75K-$99,999 141 19.0 % $100K-$149,999 144 19.4 % $150K-$199,999 61 8.2 % $200K+ 43 5.8 % Not sure 90 12.1 % Total 743 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 90     Q41. How do you make and receive phones calls? Q41. How do you make & receive phone calls Number Percent Landline 19 2.6 % Cell phone 525 70.7 % Both 187 25.2 % Not provided 12 1.6 % Total 743 100.0 % Q41a. (If answered "both" to Question 41) Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receive calls? Q41a. Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make & receive calls Number Percent Primarily use cell phone 116 62.0 % Primarily use landline 62 33.2 % Not provided 9 4.8 % Total 187 100.0 % Q41b. (If answered "cell phone/both" to Question 41) Who is your cell phone service provider? Q41b. Who is your cell phone service provider Number Percent Verizon 383 53.8 % AT&T 110 15.4 % Sprint 58 8.1 % T-Mobile 78 11.0 % Other 45 6.3 % Not provided 38 5.3 % Total 712 100.0 % City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 91     Q41b. Other Q41b. Other Number Percent Boost 2 4.8 % CAN 1 2.4 % Cable One 2 4.8 % Consumer cellular 3 7.1 % Credo 1 2.4 % Cricket 7 16.7 % Google Fiber 2 4.8 % Jitterbug 1 2.4 % PROJECT FI 1 2.4 % Page plus 3 7.1 % Republic 2 4.8 % Straight Talk 6 14.3 % TING 1 2.4 % Tracfone 8 19.0 % Virgin 1 2.4 % WalMart Friends & Family plan 1 2.4 % Total 42 100.0 % Q42. Who is your internet service provider? Q42. Who is your internet service provider Number Percent Centurylink 377 50.7 % CableOne 281 37.8 % Dish 13 1.7 % CTC/Westel Fiber 26 3.5 % Direct Communications 4 0.5 % Other 6 0.8 % Not sure 36 4.8 % Total 743 100.0 % Q42. Other Q42. Other Number Percent ACN 1 16.7 % Direct TV 1 16.7 % Rise 1 16.7 % SPRINT NOT SPOT 1 16.7 % Verizon 2 33.3 % Total 6 100.0 %   City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 92                 Section 5  Survey Instrument      City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 93 IDIAN� Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Joe Borton Luke Cavener Ty Palmer Genesis Milam Anne Little Roberts April 3, 2017 Dear Meridian Resident, We want your voice to be heard! The City of Meridian wants to know your thoughts on how we are doing in providing service to you, our residents. You have been randomly selected and we ask that you invest a few minutes of your time to take this important customer satisfaction survey. Your input and feedback will help the City focus our planning and budget decisions pertaining to the delivery and quality of services we provide you and your neighbors. Your responses will also help us better understand your use of and satisfaction with City services, programs, and your impressions about the performance of the City as a whole. The survey is designed to cover a wide variety of topics including your feelings about how the City uses your tax dollars, how safe you feel in the City, and how you perceive Meridian as a place to live. In addition, ·this survey will touch on several local issues from other agencies or jurisdictions such as roads and schools which are provided by our partners. The survey is being conducted by ETC Institute, a national market research firm that specializes in conducting surveys for local governments. The survey is entirely voluntary and should take only 10 to 15 minutes of your time. We ask that you complete it as soon as possible. You can either complete the written survey and return it in the mail using the postage paid envelope, or complete the survey online at www.meridiancitysurvey.org Please know that regardless of how you complete the survey, your responses will be completely confidential and combined with the responses of other Meridian residents. Thank you in advance for your participation. Your feedback matters! This information we obtain is critical to our understanding of the current and future needs of our Meridian residents. If you have questions on this survey, please contact the City of Meridian Mayor's Office at 208-489-0529. Otherwise, you can look for the survey results to be posted on the City of Meridian's website (www.meridiancity.org) by early June. My warmest regards, 1�::r Mayor's Office • 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-4433 • Fax 208-884-8119 • www.meridiancity.org City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 94 2 0 1 7 E T C I n s t i t u t e 1 2017 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Please take a few minutes to complete this survey. Your input is an important part of the City's on-going effort to improve the quality of services provided by the City. You may also complete this survey on-line by going to www.meridiancitysurvey.org. If you have questions, please call the Mayor’s Office at 489-0529. THANK YOU! 1. The vision for the City of Meridian is as follows: “By 2035, Meridian will be the West’s premier community to live, work and raise a family.” Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Excellent” and 0 means “Poor,” please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas: Excellent Poor Don't Know 01. As a place to live 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. As a place to work 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. As a place to raise a family 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. As a place to start/do business 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. As a city that is building a strong sense of community 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. As a city that is developing a strong local economy 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. As a city that is developing a strong local workforce that can compete in today’s economic climate 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08. As a city that is planning for future growth and development 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. As a city that is developing a sustainable and conscious environment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. How well the City is protecting the quality of the air and water 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. How well the City is maintaining high quality neighborhoods 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. How well the City is providing options for mobility other than driving 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. How well the City is ensuring public safety 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 14. How well the City is communicating with the community 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. While the City is not the sole contributor to your quality of life, it is important to understand the perceptions residents have of the quality of life in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Greatly Exceeds My Expectations” and 0 means “Does Not Meet My Expectations at All,” please rate the City and its partners in the following areas: Greatly Exceeds My Expectations Does Not Meet My Expectations at All Don't Know 1. Overall quality of life in the City 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Overall quality of city services provided 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Overall quality of customer service you receive from city employees 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Your view of an ideal place to live 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Strongly Agree” and 0 means “Strongly Disagree,” please rate your level of agreement with the following. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Don't Know 1. Quality housing and a variety of options exist in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Development in the City enhances the quality of life 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. There are a variety of employment opportunities in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Access to quality shopping and entertainment exist in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. The City is managing growth wisely 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Meridian has a sense of community 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 7. The City continuously improves services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 8. The City uses your tax dollars wisely 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 9. The City is headed in the right direction 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 95 2 0 1 7 E T C I n s t i t u t e 2 4. If you own a home in Meridian, approximately 29% of your total property tax bill goes to the City of Meridian to fund the City’s operating budget for services such as police, fire and parks services. Relating to services and facilities in the City of Meridian, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Definitely Getting My Money’s Worth” and 0 means “Definitely Not Getting My Money’s Worth,” please rate the value you feel you are getting for City tax dollars and fees. Definitely Getting My Money’s Worth Definitely Not Getting My Money’s Worth Don't Know 1. Value received for city tax dollars and fees 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Excellent” and 0 means “Poor,” please rate the quality of the following services provided by the City of Meridian. Excellent Poor Don't Know 01. Fire/Rescue Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Fire prevention and public education 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. Police department/law enforcement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. Code enforcement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. Traffic enforcement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Planning & zoning services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Building permit services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08. Sewer services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. Water services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. Garbage/trash pick-up services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. Recycling services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. City parks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. Recreation programs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 14. Programs for youth 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 15. Communications 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 16. Passport Acceptance Agency 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Which THREE of the City Services listed above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from city leaders over the next TWO years? [Enter the numbers for your top choices using the list in Question 5 above.] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ 7. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Excellent” and 0 means “Poor,” please rate the following services provided by other agency partners. Excellent Poor Don't Know 01. Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Animal control contracted with Idaho Humane Society 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. Programs for seniors at the Meridian Senior Center 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. K-12 education by West Ada School District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. Lakeview Golf Course 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Library services by the Meridian Library District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Swimming Pool by Western Ada Recreation District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08. State Highways operated by Idaho Transportation Department (Eagle Road, Meridian Road, and Chinden Boulevard) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. All city roads operated by Ada County Highway District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. Elections by Ada County Clerk 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. Cemetery services by Meridian Cemetery Maintenance District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. Cell/mobile/data service by provider in Meridian area 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. Internet service by telecommunications provider in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 96 2 0 1 7 E T C I n s t i t u t e 3 8. There are a variety of transportation infrastructure improvements needed along roads in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “High Priority” and 0 means “No Priority,” please rate the following road-related aspects of our community you would like to see. High Priority No Priority Don't Know 1. Roadway widening (from single to multiple lanes) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Intersection improvements 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Pathways/sidewalk connections on local streets 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Sidewalks on arterial (major) roadways 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Street lights 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Shared bike and pedestrian facilities (similar to Boise Greenbelt) detached from roadway 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 7. Beautification/landscaping 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 9. Which THREE of the transportation improvements listed above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from city leaders in working with partner agencies over the next THREE years? [Enter the numbers for your top choices using the list in Question 8 above.] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ 10. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Excellent” and 0 means “Poor,” please rate the following parks and recreation services. Excellent Poor Don't Know 01. Number of city parks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Quality, appearance and maintenance of city parks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. Quality of athletic fields 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. Number of special events and festivals 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. Quality and variety of special events and festivals 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Number of pathways for walking and biking 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Quality of pathways for walking and biking 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08. Availability of information about recreation programs and classes through social media, Activity Guides, email updates, website, etc. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. Availability of community center and gym facilities 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. Number of recreation programs and classes 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. Quality and variety of recreation programs and classes 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. Number of adult sports programs and sporting events 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. Quality of the adult sports programs and sporting events 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 14. Availability of youth sports programs through partners, such as the Police Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), and others. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 15. Quality of youth sports programs through partners, such as the Police Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), and others. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? ____ (1) Yes, I have personally visited a city park in the last year ____ (2) Yes, a household member has visited a city park in the last year ____ (3) No 12. Some neighborhoods have a great “sense of community.” People know their neighbors form Neighborhood Watch Programs or have block parties and truly think of the others in the same area as “neighbors.” Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means a “Very Strong Sense of Community” and 0 means “No Sense of Community at All,” please rate the sense of community in your neighborhood. Very Strong Sense of Community No Sense of Community At All Don't Know 1. Rating of the “sense of community” in your neighborhood 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 97 2 0 1 7 E T C I n s t i t u t e 4 13. Public safety has prioritized public outreach using social media, public presentations, citizen academies, and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Excellent” and 0 means “Poor,” please rate the following public safety services. Excellent Poor Don't Know 01. Overall feeling of safety in the City 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Quality of local police protection 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. The visibility of police in neighborhoods 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. Safety in city parks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Police safety education programs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Professionalism of employees responding to emergencies 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08. Overall quality of the fire department 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. How quickly fire department responds to 911 emergencies 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. Quality of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. Fire safety education programs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. Current location of fire stations 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. Fire department public outreach 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 14. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Excellent” and 0 means “Poor,” please rate the City’s efforts in the enforcement of the following codes and ordinances. Excellent Poor Don't Know 1. Weed abatement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Removal of graffiti 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Abandoned/junk automobile removal 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Clean-up of litter and debris on private property 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Dilapidated houses or buildings 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Illegal dumping 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 15. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? ____ (1) Yes ____ (2) No ____ (9) Don’t Know 16. The Meridian Fire Department is working with other Treasure Valley Fire Departments which have produced cost savings and better effectiveness in exchange for group decision-making for certain department operations. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Strongly Agree” and 0 means “Strongly Disagree,” please rate the level of cooperation and collaboration you would like to see happen. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Don't Know 1. Our fire department should be completely independent in its operations 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Our fire department should collaborate with other fire departments in operations 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Our fire department should consolidate operations with other cities into one area department 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 17. In general, would you favor or oppose a city ordinance making it illegal within the City of Meridian to deny goods, services, housing, or employment to someone because he or she is gay, bisexual, or transgender? ____ (1) Favor ____ (2) Oppose ____ (3) Not sure 18. Under state law, smoking is prohibited in restaurants and most workplaces, but allowed in bars and small businesses with less than 5 employees. In general, would you favor or oppose a city ordinance prohibiting smoking within the City of Meridian in all indoor public places, including bars, and small businesses? ____ (1) Favor ____ (2) Oppose ___ (3) Not sure City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 98 2 0 1 7 E T C I n s t i t u t e 5 19. The City uses a variety of methods to communicate with the public, including its website, social media such as Nextdoor, Facebook and Twitter, traditional media such as newspapers, radio, and television, and a bi-weekly newsletter. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Excellent” and 0 means “Poor,” please rate the following communication services. Excellent Poor Don't Know 1. Effectiveness of city communications with the public 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Opportunities for public involvement in local decision-making 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Quality of www.meridiancity.org 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. The usefulness of the online services available on the City of Meridian’s website (bill pay/class registration) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Quality of information about city programs and services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 20. Where do you currently get information about Meridian’s services and programs? (Check all that apply) ___ (01) City website ___ (02) Social Media (Nextdoor, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) ___ (03) Television/news ___ (04) Flyers in utility bills ___ (05) Information booklets/city publications ___ (06) Newspaper ____ (07) Radio ____ (08) Emails from the City ____ (09) Events such as Coffee with the Mayor, Town Halls ____ (10) Other Source: ____________________________ 21. If the City were to expand to another communication platform, from which new platform would you prefer to receive information about Meridian’s services and programs? (Check one) ____ (1) Texts ____ (2) Mobile applications ____ (3) None of the above ____ (4) Other source: ________________ 22. Did you visit downtown Meridian at least once during the past year for a purpose other than work? ____ (1) Yes[Go to 22a] ____ (2) No[Go to 23] ____ (3) Don’t remember 22a. [If YES to Q22] When you think about your visits to downtown over the last year, how satisfied were you with your overall experience? ____ (1) Very dissatisfied ____ (2) Somewhat dissatisfied ____ (3) Neutral ____ (4) Somewhat satisfied ____ (5) Very satisfied 23. The City of Meridian is looking to foster development of vibrant downtown entertainment options in the future to meet the needs of various generations. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Excellent” and 0 means “Poor,” please rate the following types of nightlife entertainment options you believe would positively contribute to a vibrant downtown. Excellent Poor Don't Know 1. Restaurants 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Bars and Nightclubs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Live Music Venues 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Live Event Venues (i.e., Comedy Club/Magician) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Performance Art (Plays/Opera/Symphony) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Movie Theatre 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 7. Brewery/Wine Tasting Rooms 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 8. Pool Hall/Arcade/Bingo 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 9. Other: ____________________________________ 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 24. Which TWO of the options listed above do you think the City should MOST FOCUS their attention on to bring to downtown over the next THREE years? [Enter the numbers for your top choices using the list in Question 23 above.] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 25. Meridian continues to grow, and there has been an indication that preserving farmland is important to the community. One way to preserve farmland would be by voter initiative to enact a levy to purchase farmland in order to preserve it for agricultural purposes. In general, would you be willing to support a levy, similar to the Boise Foothills Levy for this purpose? ____ (1) Yes ____ (2) No ____ (3) Not sure City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 99 2 0 1 7 E T C I n s t i t u t e 6 26. In general, would you favor or oppose allowing residents of a city the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax (local option tax) increase to provide funding for identified infrastructure improvements in the community? ____ (1) Favor ____ (2) Oppose ____ (3) Not sure 27. The City of Meridian has taken the position to save money for future improvements and not use bonds for new facilities. If the City were to place a bond measure on the ballot for $10 million that could cost homeowners approximately .91 cents per month for a home with an assessed value of $100 thousand dollars, in general would you support this bond for the following items using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “Highly Likely” and 0 means “Very Unlikely.” Highly Likely Very Unlikely Don't Know 1. Building a multipurpose center that would include flexible space for meetings and conferences in downtown 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. Constructing Linder Road overpass 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 3. Building an indoor aquatics center 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 4. Building a performing arts center 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. Adding more bike lanes and pathways 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 6. Providing more public transportation options 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 7. Developing a pathway along the rail corridor 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 8. Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 28. Which TWO of the options listed above would you be MOST WILLING to support, if any? [Enter the numbers for your top choices using the list in Question 27 above.] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ None of the Above 29. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means “High Priority” and 0 means “No Priority,” please rate the importance of the following community issues. High Priority No Priority Don't Know 01. Roads/Traffic/Transportation 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 02. Growth/Development 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 03. Education/Schools 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 04. Homelessness/Social Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 05. AirBnB/Vacation Rentals 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 06. Affordable Housing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 07. Jobs/Economic Development 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 08. Public Transportation 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 09. Downtown redevelopment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 10. Pathway/sidewalk connections 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11. City Tax burden 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12. Telecommunications (cell phone/internet service) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 13. Access to Mental Health Services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 30. Which THREE of the Priorities listed above do you think should receive the MOST EMPHASIS from city leaders over the next THREE years? [Enter the numbers for your top choices using the list in Question 29 above.] 1st: ____ 2nd: ____ 3rd: ____ 31. Use the space below to address any additional comments you wish to share with the City of Meridian. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ DEMOGRAPHICS 32. Your gender? ____(1) Male ____(2) Female 33. What is your age? ____ (1) 18 to 24 ____ (2) 25 to 34 ____ (3) 35 to 44 ____ (4) 45 to 54 ____ (5) 55 to 64 ____ (6) 65 or older City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 100 2 0 1 7 E T C I n s t i t u t e 7 34. Which of the following best describes the home in which you live? ____(1) A manufactured trailer or mobile home ____(2) An apartment ____(3) A condominium ____(4) Townhouse or duplex ____(5) A detached single-family house ____(6) Other: _______________ 35. Do you own or rent your home? ____(1) Own ____(2) Rent ____(3) Don’t know ____(4) Other: _______________ 36. How many years and months have you lived in Meridian? ________ number of years ________ number of months 37. Including yourself, how many people in your household are: Under Age 5 ____ Ages 10-14 ____ Ages 18 and over ____ Ages 5-9 ____ Ages 15-17 ____ 38. Does your household have a dog? ____(1) Yes [Answer Q38a-b] ____(2) No [Go to Q39] 38a. [If YES to Q#38] How many dogs do you have in your household? ___ (1) One ___ (2) Two ___ (3) Three ___ (4) Four or more 38b. [If YES to Q#38] Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually? ___ (1) Yes ___ (2) No 39. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? [Select one] ____ (01) Employed full time ____ (02) Employed part time ____ (03) Self-employed ____ (04) Not employed outside the home; a homemaker ____ (05) Retired ____ (06) A full-time student, not working ____ (07) A student working full time ____ (08) A student working part time ____ (09) Not employed due to a disability ____ (10) Not employed, but seeking work ____ (11) Not employed, but NOT seeking work ____ (12) Other: _______________ 40. What is the approximate total annual family income of all members of your household? ____ (01) Less than $20,000 ____ (02) $20,000-$34,999 ____ (03) $35,000-$49,999 ____ (04) $50,000-$74,999 ____ (05) $75,000-$99,999 ____ (06) $100,000-$149,999 ____ (07) 150,000-$199,999 ____ (08) $200,000 or more ____ (09) Not sure 41. How do you make and receive phones calls? ____ (1) Landline [Answer Q42] ____ (2) Cell phone [Answer Q41b] ____ (3) Both [Answer Q41a-b] 41a. [If BOTH to Q41] Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receive calls? ___ (1) Primarily use cell phone ___ (2) Primarily use landline 41b. [If CELL PHONE/BOTH to Q41] Who is your cell phone service provider? ___ (1) Verizon ___ (2) AT&T ___ (3) Sprint ___ (4) T-Mobile ___ (5) Other: _____________ 42. Who is your Internet Service Provider? ____ (01) Centurylink ____ (02) CableOne ____ (03) Dish ____ (04) CTC/Westel Fiber ____ (05) Safelink ____ (06) Tekfinity ____ (07) Direct Communications ____ (08) Other: ________________ ____ (09) Not sure This concludes the survey. Thank you for your time! Please return your completed survey in the enclosed postage paid envelope addressed to: ETC Institute, 725 W. Frontier Circle, Olathe, KS 66061 Your responses will remain completely confidential. The information printed to the right will ONLY be used to help identify which areas of the City are having problems with city services. If your address is not correct, please provide the correct information. Thank you. City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 101     …helping organizations make better decisions since 1982  Submitted to the City of Meridian, Idaho ETC Institute  725 W. Frontier Lane,  Olathe, Kansas   66061  June 2017 City of Meridian  Citizen Survey   GIS Maps  Interpreting GIS Maps City of Meridian, Idaho  The maps on the following pages show the mean ratings for several  questions on the survey by survey region.    When reading the maps, please use the following color scheme as a guide:  DARK/LIGHT BLUE shades indicate POSITIVE ratings. Shades of blue generally indicate satisfaction with a service, ratings of “excellent” or “good” and ratings of “very safe” or “safe.” OFF‐WHITE shades indicate NEUTRAL ratings. Shades of neutral generally indicate that residents thought the quality of service delivery is adequate. ORANGE/RED shades indicate NEGATIVE ratings. Shades of orange/red generally indicate dissatisfaction with a service, ratings of “below average” or “poor” and ratings of “unsafe” or “very unsafe.” City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 1 Lo c a t i o n o f S u r v e y R e s p o n d e n t s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 2 Q1 . 1 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : A s a p l a c e t o l i v e 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 3 Q1 . 2 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : A s a p l a c e t o w o r k 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 4 Q1 . 3 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : A s a p l a c e t o r a i s e a f a m i l y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 5 Q1 . 4 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : A s a p l a c e t o s t a r t / d o b u s i n e s s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 6 Q1 . 5 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : A s a c i t y t h a t i s b u i l d i n g a s t r o n g s e n s e o f c o m m u n i t y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 7 Q1 . 6 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : A s a c i t y t h a t i s de v e l o p i n g a s t r o n g l o c a l e c o n o m y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 8 Q1 . 7 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : A s a c i t y t h a t i s d e v e l o p i n g a s t r o n g l o c a l wo r k f o r c e t h a t c a n c o m p e t e i n t o d a y ’ s e c o n o m i c c l i m a t e 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 9 Q1 . 8 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : A s a c i t y t h a t i s p l a n n i n g fo r f u t u r e g r o w t h a n d d e v e l o p m e n t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 10 Q1 . 9 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : A s a c i t y t h a t i s d e v e l o p i n g a s u s t a i n a b l e a n d c o n s c i o u s e n v i r o n m e n t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 11 Q1 . 1 0 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : H o w w e l l t h e C i t y i s pr o t e c t i n g t h e q u a l i t y o f t h e a i r a n d w a t e r 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 12 Q1 . 1 1 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : H o w w e l l t h e C i t y i s ma i n t a i n i n g h i g h q u a l i t y n e i g h b o r h o o d s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 13 Q1 . 1 2 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : H o w w e l l t h e C i t y i s p r o v i d i n g op t i o n s f o r m o b i l i t y o t h e r t h a n d r i v i n g 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 14 Q1 . 1 3 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : H o w w e l l t h e Ci t y i s e n s u r i n g p u b l i c s a f e t y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 15 Q1 . 1 4 R a t i n g M e r i d i a n : H o w w e l l t h e C i t y i s co m m u n i c a t i n g w i t h t h e c o m m u n i t y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 16 Q2 . 1 E x p e c t a t i o n o f : O v e r a l l q u a l i t y o f l i f e i n t h e C i t y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 D o e s n ’ t M e e t E x p e c t a t i o n s a t A l l 2 - 4 D o e s n ’ t E x c e e d E x p e c t a t i o n s 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 E x c e e d s E x p e c t a t i o n s 8 - 1 0 G r e a t l y E x c e e d s E x p e c t a t i o n s No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 17 Q2 . 2 E x p e c t a t i o n o f : O v e r a l l q u a l i t y o f c i t y s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 D o e s n ’ t M e e t E x p e c t a t i o n s a t A l l 2 - 4 D o e s n ’ t E x c e e d E x p e c t a t i o n s 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 E x c e e d s E x p e c t a t i o n s 8 - 1 0 G r e a t l y E x c e e d s E x p e c t a t i o n s No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 18 Q2 . 3 E x p e c t a t i o n o f : O v e r a l l q u a l i t y o f c u s t o m e r se r v i c e y o u r e c e i v e f r o m c i t y e m p l o y e e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 D o e s n ’ t M e e t E x p e c t a t i o n s a t A l l 2 - 4 D o e s n ’ t E x c e e d E x p e c t a t i o n s 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 E x c e e d s E x p e c t a t i o n s 8 - 1 0 G r e a t l y E x c e e d s E x p e c t a t i o n s No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 19 Q2 . 4 E x p e c t a t i o n o f : Y o u r v i e w o f a n i d e a l p l a c e t o l i v e 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 D o e s n ’ t M e e t E x p e c t a t i o n s a t A l l 2 - 4 D o e s n ’ t E x c e e d E x p e c t a t i o n s 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 E x c e e d s E x p e c t a t i o n s 8 - 1 0 G r e a t l y E x c e e d s E x p e c t a t i o n s No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 20 Q3 . 1 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : Q u a l i t y h o u s i n g a n d a v a r i e t y o f o p t i o n s e x i s t i n M e r i d i a n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 21 Q3 . 2 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : D e v e l o p m e n t i n t h e Ci t y e n h a n c e s t h e q u a l i t y o f l i f e 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 22 Q3 . 3 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : T h e r e a r e a v a r i e t y o f em p l o y m e n t o p p o r t u n i t i e s i n M e r i d i a n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 23 Q3 . 4 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : A c c e s s t o q u a l i t y s h o p p i n g an d e n t e r t a i n m e n t e x i s t i n M e r i d i a n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 24 Q3 . 5 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : T h e C i t y i s m a n a g i n g g r o w t h w i s e l y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 25 Q3 . 6 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : M e r i d i a n h a s a s e n s e o f c o m m u n i t y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 26 Q3 . 7 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : T h e C i t y c o n t i n u o u s l y i m p r o v e s s e r v i c e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 27 Q3 . 8 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : T h e C i t y u s e s y o u r t a x d o l l a r s w i s e l y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 28 Q3 . 9 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : T h e C i t y i s h e a d e d i n t h e r i g h t d i r e c t i o n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 29 Q4 . 1 P e r c e p t i o n s : V a l u e r e c e i v e d f o r c i t y t a x d o l l a r s a n d f e e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 D e f i n i t e l y N o t G e t t i n g M o n e y ’ s W o r t h 2 - 4 N o t G e t t i n g M o n e y ’ s W o r t h 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G e t t i n g M o n e y ’ s W o r t h 8 - 1 0 D e f i n i t e l y G e t t i n g M o n e y ’ s W o r t h No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 30 Q7 . 1 R a t i n g o f : P u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s e r v i c e s co n t r a c t e d w i t h V a l l e y R e g i o n a l T r a n s i t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 31 Q7 . 2 R a t i n g o f : A n i m a l c o n t r o l c o n t r a c t e d w i t h I d a h o H u m a n S o c i e t y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 32 Q7 . 3 R a t i n g o f : P r o g r a m s f o r s e n i o r s a t t h e M e r i d i a n S e n i o r C e n t e r 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 33 Q7 . 4 R a t i n g o f : K - 1 2 e d u c a t i o n b y W e s t A d a S c h o o l D i s t r i c t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 34 Q7 . 5 R a t i n g o f : L a k e v i e w G o l f C o u r s e 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 35 Q7 . 6 R a t i n g o f : L i b r a r y s e r v i c e s b y t h e M e r i d i a n L i b r a r y D i s t r i c t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 36 Q7 . 7 R a t i n g o f : S w i m m i n g P o o l b y W e s t e r n A d a R e c r e a t i o n D i s t r i c t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 37 Q7 . 8 R a t i n g o f : S t a t e H i g h w a y s o p e r a t e d by I d a h o T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 38 Q7 . 9 R a t i n g o f : A l l c i t y r o a d s o p e r a t e d by A d a C o u n t y H i g h w a y D i s t r i c t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 39 Q7 . 1 0 R a t i n g o f : E l e c t i o n s b y A d a C o u n t y C l e r k 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 40 Q7 . 1 1 R a t i n g o f : C e m e t e r y s e r v i c e s b y Me r i d i a n C e m e t e r y M a i n t e n a n c e D i s t r i c t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 41 Q7 . 1 2 R a t i n g o f : C e l l / m o b i l e / d a t a s e r v i c e by p r o v i d e r i n M e r i d i a n a r e a 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 42 Q7 . 1 3 R a t i n g o f : I n t e r n e t s e r v i c e b y te l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s p r o v i d e r i n M e r i d i a n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 43 Q8 . 1 P r i o r i t y o f : R o a d w a y w i d e n i n g 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 44 Q8 . 2 P r i o r i t y o f : I n t e r s e c t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 45 Q8 . 3 P r i o r i t y o f : P a t h w a y s / s i d e w a l k c o n n e c t i o n s o n l o c a l s t r e e t s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 46 Q8 . 4 P r i o r i t y o f : S i d e w a l k s o n a r t e r i a l r o a d w a y s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 47 Q8 . 5 P r i o r i t y o f : S t r e e t l i g h t s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 48 Q8 . 6 P r i o r i t y o f : S h a r e d b i k e a n d p e d e s t r i a n fa c i l i t i e s d e t a c h e d f r o m r o a d w a y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 49 Q8 . 7 P r i o r i t y o f : B e a u t i f i c a t i o n / l a n d s c a p i n g 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 50 Q1 0 . 1 R a t i n g o f : N u m b e r o f c i t y p a r k s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 51 Q1 0 . 2 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y , a p p e a r a n c e a n d m a i n t e n a n c e o f c i t y p a r k s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 52 Q1 0 . 3 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y o f a t h l e t i c f i e l d s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 53 Q1 0 . 4 R a t i n g o f : N u m b e r o f s p e c i a l e v e n t s a n d f e s t i v a l s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 54 Q1 0 . 5 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y a n d v a r i e t y of s p e c i a l e v e n t s a n d f e s t i v a l s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 55 Q1 0 . 6 R a t i n g o f : N u m b e r o f p a t h w a y s f o r w a l k i n g a n d b i k i n g 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 56 Q1 0 . 7 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y o f p a t h w a y s f o r w a l k i n g a n d b i k i n g 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 57 Q1 0 . 8 R a t i n g o f : A v a i l a b i l i t y o f i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t r e c r e a t i o n p r o g r a m s a n d cl a s s e s t h r o u g h s o c i a l m e d i a , A c t i v i t y G u i d e s , e m a i l u p d a t e s , w e b s i t e , e t c . 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 58 Q1 0 . 9 R a t i n g o f : A v a i l a b i l i t y o f c o m m u n i c a t i o n ce n t e r a n d g y m f a c i l i t i e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 59 Q1 0 . 1 0 R a t i n g o f : N u m b e r o f r e c r e a t i o n p r o g r a m s a n d c l a s s e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 60 Q1 0 . 1 1 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y a n d v a r i e t y o f re c r e a t i o n p r o g r a m s a n d c l a s s e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 61 Q1 0 . 1 2 R a t i n g o f : N u m b e r o f a d u l t s p o r t s pr o g r a m s a n d s p o r t i n g e v e n t s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 62 Q1 0 . 1 3 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y o f t h e a d u l t s p o r t s pr o g r a m s a n d s p o r t i n g e v e n t s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 63 Q1 0 . 1 4 R a t i n g o f : A v a i l a b i l i t y o f y o u t h s p o r t s pr o g r a m s t h r o u g h p a r t n e r s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 64 Q1 0 . 1 5 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y o f y o u t h sp o r t s p r o g r a m s t h r o u g h p a r t n e r s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 65 Q1 2 . 1 R a t i n g o f : T h e “ s e n s e o f c o m m u n i t y ” i n y o u r n e i g h b o r h o o d 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Se n s e o f C o m m u n i t y Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 N o S e n s e o f C o m m u n i t y a t A l l 2 - 4 N o S e n s e o f C o m m u n i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 S t r o n g S e n s e o f C o m m u n i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y S t r o n g S e n s e o f C o m m u n i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 66 Q1 3 . 1 R a t i n g o f : O v e r a l l f e e l i n g o f s a f e t y i n t h e C i t y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 67 Q1 3 . 2 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y o f l o c a l p o l i c e p r o t e c t i o n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 68 Q1 3 . 3 R a t i n g o f : H o w q u i c k l y p o l i c e r e s p o n d t o 9 1 1 e m e r g e n c i e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 69 Q1 3 . 4 R a t i n g o f : T h e v i s i b i l i t y o f p o l i c e i n n e i g h b o r h o o d s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 70 Q1 3 . 5 R a t i n g o f : S a f e t y i n c i t y p a r k s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 71 Q1 3 . 6 R a t i n g o f : P o l i c e s a f e t y e d u c a t i o n p r o g r a m s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 72 Q1 3 . 7 R a t i n g o f : P r o f e s s i o n a l i s m o f e m p l o y e e s re s p o n d i n g t o e m e r g e n c i e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 73 Q1 3 . 8 R a t i n g o f : O v e r a l l q u a l i t y o f t h e f i r e d e p a r t m e n t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 74 Q1 3 . 9 R a t i n g o f : H o w q u i c k l y f i r e d e p a r t m e n t re s p o n d s t o 9 1 1 e m e r g e n c i e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 75 Q1 3 . 1 0 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y o f E m e r g e n c y M e d i c a l S e r v i c e s ( E M S ) 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 76 Q1 3 . 1 1 R a t i n g o f : F i r e s a f e t y e d u c a t i o n p r o g r a m s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 77 Q1 3 . 1 2 R a t i n g o f : C u r r e n t l o c a t i o n o f f i r e s t a t i o n s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 78 Q1 3 . 1 3 R a t i n g o f : F i r e d e p a r t m e n t p u b l i c o u t r e a c h 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 79 Q1 4 . 1 R a t i n g o f : W e e d a b a t e m e n t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 80 Q1 4 . 2 R a t i n g o f : R e m o v a l o f g r a f f i t i 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 81 Q1 4 . 3 R a t i n g o f : A b a n d o n e d / j u n k a u t o m o b i l e r e m o v a l 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 82 Q1 4 . 4 R a t i n g o f : C l e a n - u p o f l i t t e r a n d d e b r i s o n p r i v a t e p r o p e r t y 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 83 Q1 4 . 5 R a t i n g o f : D i l a p i d a t e d h o u s e s o r b u i l d i n g s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 84 Q1 4 . 6 R a t i n g o f : I l l e g a l d u m p i n g 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 85 Q1 6 . 1 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : O u r f i r e d e p a r t m e n t s h o u l d be c o m p l e t e l y i n d e p e n d e n t i n i t s o p e r a t i o n s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 86 Q1 6 . 2 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : O u r f i r e d e p a r t m e n t s h o u l d co l l a b o r a t e w i t h o t h e r f i r e d e p a r t m e n t s i n o p e r a t i o n s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 87 Q1 6 . 3 A g r e e m e n t w i t h : O u r f i r e d e p a r t m e n t s h o u l d c o n s o l i d a t e op e r a t i o n s w i t h o t h e r c i t i e s i n t o o n e a r e a d e p a r t m e n t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Ag r e e m e n t Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 S t r o n g l y D i s a g r e e 2 - 4 D i s a g r e e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 A g r e e 8 - 1 0 S t r o n g l y A g r e e No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 88 Q1 9 . 1 R a t i n g o f : E f f e c t i v e n e s s o f c i t y c o m m u n i c a t i o n s w i t h t h e p u b l i c 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 89 Q1 9 . 2 R a t i n g o f : O p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r p u b l i c in v o l v e m e n t i n l o c a l d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 90 Q1 9 . 3 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y o f w w w . m e r i d i a n c i t y . o r g 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 91 Q1 9 . 4 R a t i n g o f : T h e u s e f u l n e s s o f t h e o n l i n e s e r v i c e s av a i l a b l e o n t h e C i t y o f M e r i d i a n ’ s w e b s i t e 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 92 Q1 9 . 5 R a t i n g o f : Q u a l i t y o f i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t ci t y p r o g r a m s a n d s e r v i c e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 93 Q2 3 . 1 R a t i n g o f : R e s t a u r a n t s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 94 Q2 3 . 2 R a t i n g o f : B a r s a n d N i g h t c l u b s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 95 Q2 3 . 3 R a t i n g o f : L i v e M u s i c V e n u e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 96 Q2 3 . 4 R a t i n g o f : L i v e E v e n t V e n u e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 97 Q2 3 . 5 R a t i n g o f : P e r f o r m a n c e A r t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 98 Q2 3 . 6 R a t i n g o f : M o v i e T h e a t r e 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 99 Q2 3 . 7 R a t i n g o f : B r e w e r y / W i n e T a s t i n g R o o m s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 100 Q2 3 . 8 R a t i n g o f : P o o l H a l l / A r c a d e / B i n g o 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 101 Q2 3 . 8 R a t i n g o f : O t h e r 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 P o o r 2 - 4 B e l o w A v e r a g e 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 G o o d 8 - 1 0 E x c e l l e n t No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 102 Q2 7 . 1 L e v e l o f s u p p o r t f o r : B u i l d i n g a m u l t i p u r p o s e c e n t e r t h a t w o u l d in c l u d e f l e x i b l e s p a c e f o r m e e t i n g s a n d c o n f e r e n c e s i n d o w n t o w n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y U n l i k e l y 2 - 4 U n l i k e l y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 L i k e l y 8 - 1 0 V e r y L i k e l y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 103 Q2 7 . 2 L e v e l o f s u p p o r t f o r : C o n s tr u c t i n g L i n d e r R o a d o v e r p a s s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y U n l i k e l y 2 - 4 U n l i k e l y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 L i k e l y 8 - 1 0 V e r y L i k e l y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 104 Q2 7 . 3 L e v e l o f s u p p o r t f o r : B u i l d i n g a n i n d o o r a q u a t i c s c e n t e r 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y U n l i k e l y 2 - 4 U n l i k e l y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 L i k e l y 8 - 1 0 V e r y L i k e l y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 105 Q2 7 . 4 L e v e l o f s u p p o r t f o r : B u i l d i n g a p e r f o r m i n g a r t s c e n t e r 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y U n l i k e l y 2 - 4 U n l i k e l y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 L i k e l y 8 - 1 0 V e r y L i k e l y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 106 Q2 7 . 5 L e v e l o f s u p p o r t f o r : A d d i n g m o r e b i k e l a n e s a n d p a t h w a y s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y U n l i k e l y 2 - 4 U n l i k e l y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 L i k e l y 8 - 1 0 V e r y L i k e l y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 107 Q2 7 . 6 L e v e l o f s u p p o r t f o r : P r o v i d i n g m o r e pu b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n o p t i o n s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y U n l i k e l y 2 - 4 U n l i k e l y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 L i k e l y 8 - 1 0 V e r y L i k e l y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 108 Q2 7 . 7 L e v e l o f s u p p o r t f o r : D e v e l o p i n g a pa t h w a y a l o n g t h e r a i l c o r r i d o r 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y U n l i k e l y 2 - 4 U n l i k e l y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 L i k e l y 8 - 1 0 V e r y L i k e l y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 109 Q2 7 . 8 L e v e l o f s u p p o r t f o r : S e w e r T r e a t m e n t P l a n t E x p a n s i o n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pe r c e p t i o n Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y U n l i k e l y 2 - 4 U n l i k e l y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 L i k e l y 8 - 1 0 V e r y L i k e l y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 110 Q2 9 . 1 P r i o r i t y o f : R o a d s / T r a f f i c / T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 111 Q2 9 . 2 P r i o r i t y o f : G r o w t h / D e v e l o p m e n t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 112 Q2 9 . 3 P r i o r i t y o f : E d u c a t i o n / S c h o o l s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 113 Q2 9 . 4 P r i o r i t y o f : H o m e l e s s n e s s / S o c i a l S e r v i c e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 114 Q2 9 . 5 P r i o r i t y o f : A i r B n B / V a c a t i o n R e n t a l s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 115 Q2 9 . 6 P r i o r i t y o f : A f f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 116 Q2 9 . 7 P r i o r i t y o f : J o b s / E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 117 Q2 9 . 8 P r i o r i t y o f : P u b l i c T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 118 Q2 9 . 9 P r i o r i t y o f : D o w n t o w n R e d e v e l o p m e n t 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 119 Q2 9 . 1 0 P r i o r i t y o f : P a t h w a y / s i d e w a l k c o n n e c t i o n s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 120 Q2 9 . 1 1 P r i o r i t y o f : C i t y T a x b u r d e n 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 121 Q2 9 . 1 2 P r i o r i t y o f : T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 122 Q2 9 . 1 3 P r i o r i t y o f : A c c e s s t o M e n t a l H e a l t h S e r v i c e s 20 1 7 C i t y o f M e r i d i a n C i t i z e n S u r v e y Sh a d i n g r e f l e c t s t h e m e a n r a t i n g f o r a l l r e s p o n d e n t s b y s u r v e y r e g i o n Pr i o r i t y L e v e l Me a n r a t i n g o n a 1 0 - p o i n t s c a l e ET C IN S T I T U T E 0 - 2 V e r y L o w P r i o r i t y 2 - 4 L o w P r i o r i t y 4 - 6 N e u t r a l 6 - 8 H i g h P r i o r i t y 8 - 1 0 V e r y H i g h P r i o r i t y No R e s p o n s e City of Meridian Citizen Survey - GIS Maps Page 123