2017-06-13Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 13, 2017 – Page 1 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
1.
City Council Chambers
33 East Broadway Avenue
Meridian, Idaho
Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 3:00 PM 3:02PM
1. Roll-Call Attendance
X Anne Little Roberts X Joe Borton
O Ty Palmer X Keith Bird
__X___ Genesis Milam __O___ Luke Cavener (arrived at 4:46pm)
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted as amended
4. Consent Agenda Approved
A. Development Agreement for Holy Apostles Church (H-2017-0019) located at
the southeast corner of N. Meridian Road and E. Chinden Blvd. at 6300 N
Meridian Road, in the NW 1/4 of Section 30, Townsh ip 4 North, Range 1
East (Parcel No.:S0530223200)
B. Development Agreement for Harmony Hills Assisted Living (H-2016-0061)
located on the north side of W. Overland Road, west of S. Stoddard Road in
the southwest ¼ of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West
C. Approval of Task Order 10746 to Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. for the
SCADA System Upgrades PRV’s 1,14,16,17,18, and 19 for the Not-To-
Exceed amount of $76,000.00
D. Approval of Award of Bid and Agreement to Irminger Construction, Inc. for
the “WRRF Boise River Outfall Pump Station Upgrades” project for a Not -
To-Exceed amount of $802,527.00
E. Approval for Finance to Pay Vendor Payments of $1,183,930.17
F. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Hastings
Subdivision No. 3 (H-2017-0032) by Encore Development, LLC Located 2100
& 2160 W. Everest Lane
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
AMENDED MEETING AGENDA
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 13, 2017 – Page 2 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
5. Items Moved From the Consent Agenda None
6. Community Items/Presentations
A. Solid Waste Advisory Commission: Trash or Treasure Follow Up Report
7. Department Reports
A. Community Development: Introduction of the Proposed Draft of the
Uniform Street Name and Address Number Code
B. Community Development: Attachment of Sidewalk Barriers Downtown
C. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY2017 in the Amount of
$1,050,000.00 for JC Constructors’ Contract for the WRRF Capacity
Expansion Construction Project
Approved
D. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY 2017 in the Amount of $60,316 for
Repair of Sewer Infrastructure
Approved
E. Public Works: Approval of Contract Completion Letter with Travelers
pertaining to the default of Performance System, Incorporated on the City’s
“UV Disinfection Improvements” contract dated July 14, 2015 and payment
of retainage to Travelers in the amount of $11,900.35
Approved
F. Clerk’s Office: Paws in the Park Follow Up Report
G. Mayor’s Office: MYAC Budget Amendment Not To Exceed $6,660
Approved
H. Mayor’s Office: 2017 City Survey
8. Ordinances
A. Ordinance No. 17-1733: An Ordinance (Holy Apostles Catholic Church H-
2017-0019) For Annexation of a Parcel of Land Situated in a Portion of
Government Lot 1 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise
Meridian, Ada County, Idaho as Described in Attachment "A" and Annexing
Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada County, Idaho and Adjacent
and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the city of Meridian as
Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land
Use Zoning Classification of Said Lands from RUT to C-C (Community
Business District) in the Meridian City Code; Providing that Copies of this
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 13, 2017 – Page 3 of 3
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County
Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission; and Providing for a
Summary of the Ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules;
and Providing an Effective Date.
Approved
B. Amended onto agenda: Ordinance No. 17-1732A AN ORDINANCE (H-2016-
0027 MAVERIK) FOR ANNEXATION FOR PART OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT “A”
AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA
COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE
CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LANDS FROM C-2 TO C-G (GENERAL
RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY
CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED
WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND
THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND
PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR
A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Approved
9. Future Meeting Topics
10. Executive session per Idaho Code sections 74-206(1)(b) to Consider the
Evaluation, Dismissal or Disciplining of, or to Hear Complaints or Charges
Brought Against, a Public Officer, Employee, Staff Member or Individual Agent
and 74-206(1)(f), to Communicate with Legal Counsel for the Public Agency to
Discuss the Legal Ramifications of and Legal Options for Pending Litigation
Into Executive Session at 5:11pm
Out of Executive Session at 9:35pm
Adjourned at 9:35pm
Meridian City Council Workshop June 13, 2017.
A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 3:02 p.m., Tuesday,
June 13, 2017, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Joe Borton, Genesis
Milam, Luke Cavener and Anne Little Roberts.
Members Absent: Ty Palmer.
Others Present: Bill Nary, C.Jay Coles, Caleb Hood, Warren Stewart, Laurelie
McVey, Jamie Leslie, Kevin Fedrizzi, Terri Ricks, Dale Bolthouse and Dean
Willis.
Item 1: Roll-call Attendance:
Roll call.
X__ Anne Little Roberts X _ _Joe Borton
___ Ty Palmer X__ Keith Bird
__X__ Genesis Milam __X__ Lucas Cavener
__X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
De Weerd: Okay. I'd like to welcome you to our City Council meeting. Thank
you so much for joining us. For the record it is Tuesday, June 13th. It's a few
minutes after 3:00. We will start with roll call attendance, Mr. Clerk.
Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance
De Weerd: Thank you. Item No. 1 -- or 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will
all stand and join us in the pledge to our flag.
(Pledge of Allegiance recited.)
Item 3: Adoption of the Agenda
De Weerd: Item No. 3 is adoption of the agenda.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I think we just have one amendment to the agenda. In the Ordinances, 8-
A, the proposed ordinance is 17-1733. And, then, we need to amend Ordinance
No. 17-1732A to the agenda and with that I move that we approve the amended
agenda.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 2 of 45
Borton: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as read. All those
in favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT.
Item 4: Consent Agenda
A. Development Agreement for Holy Apostles Church (H-
2017-0019) located at the southeast corner of N.
Meridian Road and E. Chinden Blvd. at 6300 N Meridian
Road, in the NW 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North,
Range 1 East (Parcel No.:S0530223200)
B. Development Agreement for Harmony Hills Assisted
Living (H-2016-0061) located on the north side of W.
Overland Road, west of S. Stoddard Road in the
southwest ¼ of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1
West
C. Approval of Task Order 10746 to Bowen Collins &
Associates, Inc. for the SCADA System Upgrades PRV’s
1,14,16,17,18, and 19 for the Not-To-Exceed amount of
$76,000.00
D. Approval of Award of Bid and Agreement to Irminger
Construction, Inc. for the “WRRF Boise River Outfall
Pump Station Upgrades” project for a NotTo-Exceed
amount of $802,527.00
E. Approval for Finance to Pay Vendor Payments of
$1,183,930.17
F. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and
Order for Hastings Subdivision No. 3 (H-2017-0032) by
Encore Development, LLC Located 2100 & 2160 W.
Everest Lane
De Weerd: Item 4 is the Consent Agenda.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 3 of 45
Bird: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda as printed and for the Mayor
to sign and the Clerk to attest.
Borton: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Mr.
Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Cavene r, absent; Milam, yea; Palmer, absent;
Little Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT.
Item 5: Items Moved From the Consent Agenda
De Weerd: Okay. There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda.
Item 6: Community Items/Presentations
A. Solid Waste Advisory Commission: Trash or Treasure
Follow Up Report
De Weerd: So, we will move right into Item 6-A. With us today is the chair of our
Solid Waste Advisory Committee in Steve Cory and we are going to get a follow-
up report on Trash or Treasure. That sounds so exciting.
Cory: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, thank you for allowing us to come
up here. As promised previously, we are here to go ahead and -- sorry.
De Weerd: I don't know. I kind of like that, so --
Cory: We are here to go ahead and present a report on the Trash to Treasure
project that we did earlier this year and I am going to turn this over to the chair of
that project -- of that subcommittee and -- the guy that made it happen, Brett
Baranco. So, with no further adieu, thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. And thank you, Brett, for being here.
Baranco: Thank you, Madam Mayor and Council Members. I really appreciate
you guys allowing me to come back and present the upda te. Steve, thank you
very much for the introduction. Going into it. Trash or Treasure, once again, did
happen on April 29th and April 30th. It was a Saturday and Sunday. Weekend
event. To give you a recap of what happened, it was a creative and community
involved program that promotes repurposing items to divert from landfills , to
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 4 of 45
conjoin Trash or Treasure with spring clean up and, again, it was on April 29th
and 30th. And the HOAs that were involved were Burney Glenn, Copper Basin,
and Havasu Creek. And the cost for this event to the city was zero dollars,
thanks in large part to Republic Services. We did create a video. Last time we
were not able to play it. I just wanted to show that by the end of the event we did
have about 92 views on that video. Keep in mind maybe 20 or so were us
checking up on it to just see if -- what it was about and everything. But it was a
great -- it was a great way, the type of video it was, in my mind a success to give
people knowledge of what the program was about . We did have flyers, both
electronic and physical. Again, these were purchased by Republic Services. We
did have a pre-flyer that electronically was sent out by the HOA board members
via e-mail, Facebook, NextDoor and that was on Friday, March 31st, and that
was on -- that's the bottom little flyer right there. The one -- the flyer on the left
that electronically was sent out by the HOA board members to the e-mail,
Facebook and NextDoor on Saturday, April 15th, as well as the physical flyers
were inserted by a few of us throughout the neighborhood on April 15th as well .
We also had vertical flyers -- six of them that were purchased by Republic
Services. They were put up on Locust Grove and Star, Locust Grove and Red
Rock, Heritage Woods and Star. Tempest and Red Horse. Red Horse and
McMillan. Meridian and Halpin. We believe that these were a success. That if
you got lost you were able to find that, that you knew that you were in the vicinity
to be able to participate in Trash or Treasure. And those were erected on
Wednesday, April 26th. Show you a few people that we were able to capture.
Don't take this back to Lieutenant -- we were able to see them going through
finding a few things. The gentleman in the middle, I got to personally talk to him
and he was just sitting on the couch on that weekend and realized that that was
going on, so he got to go out and find a few trinkets himself . So, he was pretty
happy with what he was able to find. A lot of stuff is put out on the side of the
road from furniture, bikes. A lot of barbecues and exercise equipment and I --
yeah. I think I missed a memo. People are losing weight and I wouldn't be able
to get rid of my exercise equipment, that's for sure. A lot of other stuff, too, just --
just -- you wouldn't believe what you were able to find out there and some things
were taken. This was a house that I did come across multiple days I was able to
relocate -- or re-find and see what was the progress of the items that were out
there. Got to see that they had a baby stroller, exercise equipment, a table,
painting, and a kids' sandbox and later that night I saw that the sandbox and the
-- actually the exercise equipment was all that was left and the next day I even
saw the sandbox that was gone. So, it was fun getting to see the progression of
things being taken and even with my wife , when we were going through the
neighborhood, to see what was being taken and the activity, she actually yelled
at me to stop, pointed her finger and we were able to find the sandbox in its new
home. Multiple other items we were able to see get to be reduced throughout the
neighborhoods. You can see the filing cabinet and potting -- or the pots taken
away, as well as these tires. A lot of the toys, chairs, furniture, barbecue set. In
this one the toys were taken. The ottoman, as well as some chairs were taken,
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 5 of 45
as well as a lot of boxes of clutter. These ones were also taken as well. I was --
I did not get an after picture, but I was not able to find them again.
De Weerd: There was a wheelbarrow? Oh, my gosh. I would have taken that.
Baranco: Funny story. I did leave that, but I regretted it to this day, because I
told my wife, you know what, that would be a great decoration to have in my yard
and was never able to find it again. This I did find. I just wanted to show
everyone. My wife found it. She wanted to keep it and we were going to make it
into a little Lego table. We were up -- we realized -- I have a 15 month old
daughter and by the time she could use Legos it might not be big enough. So,
we have just used it for a table for her to have in our backyard to have when we
have barbecues with us. There were a slight -- there were some issues, being a
pilot year, that we ran into. Some was that some of the small items were not
properly put into the waste receptacles. So, the garbage collectors did have to
go out and manually bring them in, which cost a little bit more of time, as well as
with spring cleanup, you are required to call in larger items and a lot of people did
not read that -- the fine print with the spring cleanup to follow those regulations .
So, Republic Services had to work extra time to try and get all that stuff taken
care of and take care of Meridian. I did make a survey to try and get a capture of
what people felt about the event. We did have 52 out 488 residents respond to it.
That was 10.7 percent response. Being over ten percent I do believe that was a
victory in this survey, as much as possibly that you can get. The first question
was did you participate in the event. Thirty-nine out of 52 people did say yes.
With those 39 people one-fourth did place items out to the curb side. One found
specifically just a treasure. Twelve placed items out at curbside and found
treasures. And two people were looking through the neighborhood trying to find
something for them. And this is a list of some of the things that they were able to
take. It's just a vast array of different things for different reasons. I do believe
that potting cart, Madam Mayor, is the lucky person who found that wheelbarrow.
The people who did not participate, some of the reasons were timing conflicts
they were out of town, and they did not know what the event was about , even
with the flyers, the banners, the video, everything we could, people still were not
able to find information on it. Out of the 39 people that we asked if they would do
it again, 37 said yes. One person said heck, yes, and one person did say that --
not if it costs them anymore money for the garbage pick up. But they did not
know that the garbage pick up for spring cleanup is already on the bill . So, that
would be 39 of 39 people would like to participate again . Out of the ones that did
not participate, we asked if they would participate in the future. Five said yes.
Two said no. Four said maybe. And the one stated that they would bring it up to
their -- bring it to tenant's attention. With that said, 85 percent of the people who
did the survey said that they would like to do it again . If we do include the
maybes that would be 92 percent. We did get some positive feedback. A lot of it
just saying that they love the idea, they loved participating, and they had a great
time they would like to see it again. They were a go. Just some general
feedback we did get. Again, that people would like to know more about it. They
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 6 of 45
might have been out of town during the event . It did take place during some of
their yards sales events, so that kind of brought confusion, as well as possibly
brought more stuff for spring cleanup to pick up during that time . There was also
the confusion of people thinking that it was a waste , that it should go to charity,
but more and more the charity organizations have stricter guidelines that there
refusing a lot more stuff and they just need to be taught the purpose of this
program. That's not for the charitable items, it's for the stuff that is below that, to
try and give it a second chance . Which, again, with Stony Plain, it's taken them
ten years to get up and running. This was a pilot year. I do believe it was a
success. And I did present this to -- these results to the Solid Waste Advisory
Commission and they received it very well. They voted unanimously for me to
come to you and let you know that they wis hed to continue for another year with
this program and they will keep the sub committee going and will continue to
work -- and convene and work out the kinks from this pilot year and the City
Council will be advised of what we come across, what we decide. And with that I
would like to thank City Council, Madam Mayor, again, for allowing me to come
here and have this first event happen with successful results and I thank you very
much.
De Weerd: Thank you. You know, this was such a unique and innovative
program. So, where did the idea come from?
Baranco: So, the idea came almost a little more than a year ago . My brother-in-
law passed away and my wife, child, and I went to Stony Plain, Alberta, Canada,
and got to see what they went through with Trash or Treasure and with my sister-
in-law's loss and needing to move back to the states, it was a great opportunity
for her to get rid of a lot of her things and I got to see the entire community
involvement with it and it was just really neat to see you . I thought my city might
be interested in it as well.
De Weerd: Well, thank you for bringing back good ideas. I always love to rip off
good ideas. So, Council, any questions?
Bird: Just thank you very much.
De Weerd: Certainly in Genesis' neighborhood -- or Councilman Milam's
neighborhood you all participated. So, I think you added a little bit of feedback
last time, but --
Milam: Madam Mayor. I did participate in this event. I did fill out the survey. I
thought it was a great program. I walked around my neighborhood and there
were a lot of -- a lot of people in my neighborhood participating and I think they
did a really good job for -- you know, getting the information out and repetitively
sending the flyers out to -- through NextDoor and through our HOA, to our e-mail.
So, I think in our neighborhood a lot more people knew about it and participated.
I recognize a lot of that stuff in your pictures. I think it got -- after the stuff was
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 7 of 45
already -- from my yard was already taken, but it was great and it was a great
team effort and a great project and I'm -- do we need a motion to allow this to
continue forward or --
Cory: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I think we are going to go ahead
and work up some details and we will come back with those adjustments and
details and, then, we will ask for permission at that point.
Milam: Perfect.
De Weerd: Okay. So, we won't jump the gun then.
Milam: Thank you for all your hard work and it took a lot for -- for a pilot program
for the very first year, I think it was very successful, so --
Baranco: I could not have done it without the subcommittee members I had with
me. They are the -- they are the steam behind the engine that's for sure.
Milam: Great team over there.
Baranco: Yeah.
De Weerd: Small but mighty. Yeah. Thank you. This is -- this is fun and look
forward to next year. I'll go shopping.
Baranco: Thank you very much, everyone.
Bird: Thank you, guys.
Item 7: Department Reports
A. Community Development: Introduction of the Proposed
Draft of the Uniform Street Name and Address Number
Code
De Weerd: Okay. Under Department Reports, 7-A, we have our Community
Development Department. Hi, Terri.
Ricks: Pardon my inexperience here. Good afternoon, Madam Mayor, Members
of the Council. My name is Terri Ricks. I'm with Community Development and
I'm, basically, here to provide you with an overview or an introduction of a new
uniform street name and address number ordinance and right out of the gate I'd
like you to know that we are not here seeking your approval for this draft , but we
are seeking your input and direction, guidance from you regarding how to go
forward. As a means of a brief overview, I would like to discuss our -- our current
'97 -- or 1974 ordinance. Now, that is a whole long time ago, 43 years. There
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 8 of 45
isn't much to discuss, but we will discuss that. 1974 versus 2017. Then and
now. What was life like in Meridian then and what -- in our country and what is it
like now. We will go over the continued growth and development in the city and
county, partnering with our -- with our neighbors in public safety, with neighboring
cities and the county, and what can we do to help. I would like to discuss
standard addressing guidelines and consistency between agencies, how
important that is. I would like to discuss the numerous agencies solicited for
input in this draft. The highlights of our ordinance draft -- and we won't go over
every part, just name -- name a few things. And, then, of course, at the end
would like to seek your counsel and direction. If we could go back to -- down
memory lane a little bit to 1974. Well, our ordinance -- I didn't even know what to
say about our current ordinance, other than it consists of eight pages. It was
originally codified in 1974 and had a minor -- very minor update in 1999. It's
extremely vague regarding variances and appeals . It's extremely vague in most
areas, but it was more than likely very sufficient for our small population at that
time. 1974 versus 2017. Now, I'm a wordy person and so I just got carried away
and I had to reduce my slide . But I was -- I was in high school in 1974. That's
how long ago this was. But in 1974 gas prices shot up to 55 cents per gallon due
to the 1973 oil crisis. The average price of a new car was around 3,500 dollars.
The population of Meridian was between three and five thousand people and
Councilman Bird was in here before we began and he knew that right off the bat ,
that in 1974 we had 3,000 people. He didn't have to look at anything. The
population of Boise was between 75,000 and a hundred thousand and maybe
Councilman Bird would know if that number -- but that's as close as I was able to
get. Now, fast forward to 2017. The average gas price is 2.36 a gallon and this
is in the country, not necessarily in Meridian. The average price of a new car or
truck is just under 34,000 dollars. The population of Meridian is nearing 100,000
and the population of Boise is over 205,000. Although the cities in Ada county
were once separated by many miles of fields and pasture and desert, they are no
longer separated. In some cases today a structure literally next door to us can
be occupied by a Boise business or a county resident . In the '90s we were the
fastest growing city in the state and today we are among the fastest growing
cities in the entire country. We are in population today where Boise was in the
late '70s. Partnering in public safety. What can we do to help? Ada County
Emergency Communication Center now provides 911 service to 12 different
public agencies within the county, spanning four separate addressing grids. 911
answers approximately 1,100 emergency and nonemergency -- nonemergency
calls per day and coordinates movement for all fire and police departments within
the county, in addition to Ada County Paramedics. I tend to harp on 911 and why
do we care about 911? We have our own police and fire department. But 911 is
the beginning of an emergency. That's where it all starts. And our police and fire
departments are totally dependent on the 911 system. To become partners in
public safety we need to more efficiently help 911 dispatch in their efforts to help
us. We can provide consistency in the methods we use in assigning add resses
and approving street names. Oftentimes I use the term standard addressing
guidelines and I generally use it when I'm trying to explain to a developer or
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 9 of 45
contractor or someone why we do what we do , why we assign addresses the
way we do. Why they have to have street frontage. Why we can't just name a
street whatever we wish. Addressing guidelines do serve a purpose, but they
really lack the teeth to be applied consistently without a coordinating ordinance.
City -- although city retains final approval, other agencies are a vital, important
part of the review and recommendation process. They have been and they will
continue to be even more so. Consistently applying the same standards in
addressing and street naming with the county and those around us will result in
less confusion for dispatch, which means emergency responders will find less
confusion and the general public will be served better. Our ultimate goal in
drafting this new ordinance has been to seek consistency with our neighboring
communities and the agencies to facilitate emergency response efforts and in
previous public hearings where we have had requests for variances and appeals
regarding street names, you, the Council, have given us direction and we have
included that. We have also taken into consideration the standards and NENA is
the National Emergency Number Association, which we are compliant with. The
requested input -- we receive input and review from Meridian Police and Fire,
Planning, Legal, 911 dispatch, Ada County Assessor's land records division and
ACHD. We have also sought the input from the BCA developers council and are
awaiting their response. Basically, the highlights of our new ordinance -- are
staying as consistent as we possibly can to the Ada county guidelines. While we
-- our emphasis is on the City of Meridian, we don't live on an island and we are
tightly connected with those around us. While we are -- want to remain
consistent with their guidelines, we also know that there are unique instances
that will come up and they will qualify for a variance request to the P &Z
Commission and also provide for a limited right of appeal to Council. Along with
that we have parameters built in that are guidelines for P&Z and Council. So,
when we ask a question, when someone appeals, we are providing better
information for the applicant, as well as Council and the Commission. In those
cases, one thing we included are -- our cases we have had in the past you have
recommended to us that we set conditions, so that these things can be answered
in the future. Those things are included in our -- in our new ordinance. Again,
we are not -- you have the -- the ordinance before you. We won't go through all
the -- all the highlights -- or all the points of the ordinance, but we do hope the
highlights will interest you and we thank you for your time. Again, we will come
back when we have received input from the builders and contractors, developers,
and also if we have other information from you will come back at that time with a
final draft for approval. Do you have any questions?
De Weerd: Council, any equations?
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 10 of 45
Bird: None at this time.
De Weerd: Can you give any examples of why -- what's broken?
Ricks: What's broken is that in 1974 we had -- well, we had very -- well, we had
very few streets. We had very few addresses. Since that time we have added
hundreds of new streets, hundreds of new subdivisions, thousands of addresses.
911 used to provide services I believe for the county, but the city of Boise had
their own dispatch system. Now, they include -- now they include the city of
Boise, all these different public agencies and with the growth and development
not only -- a lot of times I am always thinking of Meridian's growth, but Boise's
has had growth, obviously. They have gone to 205,000 people and Kuna has
grown. Eagle has grown. And Ada county dispatch is dispatching to all those
areas and we are expecting them , with our street name duplications and address
grids -- sometimes the address numbers will overlap. It can be very, very
confusing, even though we are in different cities. And so this is an attempt to
bring our guidelines into -- I won't say compliance with Ada county, because Ada
county had some -- took some things that we had -- that we have developed and
worked on and, then, incorporated them into their newest revision of their
ordinance last year. But, hopefully, it's a 2017 answer to a 2017 Meridian.
De Weerd: So, when dispatch is -- is dispatching emergency personnel, are they
not giving the city? We have duplicate addresses, so they don't know what city
there are being dispatched to?
Ricks: Oddly enough that does happen. I know it's -- it's hard to believe, but it is
-- it isn't uncommon that we have police and fire dispatched to the wrong city. It's
not uncommon that we have police dispatch ed to South Meridian Road, but it
might be in Eagle, not Meridian. We have -- we have all kinds and there are
some things that -- for example, Fairview and Cherry Lane, there is certain roads
we are not going to mess with. It will be -- it would be too cumbersome. It would
be too difficult for our existing residents, but what we can do is make a change,
so that we are not -- we are not repeating our errors and so what we want to do
is not have street names that are -- that are the same as somewhere else in the
same addressing grid. We don't -- we don't -- if a new street is being requested,
we don't want that to be a street name that exists now in Boise or Kuna or Eagle.
If it sounds like something -- not only just in Meridian, but in the county, we don't
-- we don't want to approve it. Basically what we are doing is everything we can
to help dispatch on their end and even though fire and police are very well
equipped to know where they need to go in our city, they are not the only ones
responding to our emergencies and it first has to get -- get out of dispatch. So,
what we are trying to do is kind of level the playing field and when a call goes in
we are limiting the amount -- the amount of errors a dispatcher can have.
Milam: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 11 of 45
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: As much as it seems to make common sense in some ways, I'd like to
hear the -- the weigh in from the police and fire department, whether that's today
or next time when it comes back to us. I'd like to hear what they think. If you
have an opinion.
Leslie: Madam Mayor, Councilman Milam, yeah, obviously, we have an opinion.
There are instances -- I can think of just one off the top of my head at Cherry
Ave., for example, is one that exists in Boise city as well with the same
addressing grid. So, the caller may not recognize where they are at, depending
on what kind of crisis they are in, and to give a physical -- we have been
dispatched to situations before that were actually occurring in Boise on a few
occasions. Most of the software we have now in the curated dispatch system
does a pretty good job of being able to pinpoint those locations . GPS technology
now in most cell phone calls, landlines have kind of went away. So, there are
other avenues and other ways for us sometimes to pinpoint where the caller is
calling from, but there is confusion if there is a street with the same addressing
code, you know, 1000 block of Cherry Ave. here and in Boise as well can create
some confusion, so -- but for the most part I think it works fairly good currently
with the technology the way it is, but same names is complicated if it has the
same hundred block.
De Weerd: Does fire have anything to add?
Fedrizzi: Madam Mayor, I agree with Lieutenant Leslie. We have found, too,
that sometimes the numbering sequence -- houses will go up by sixes and, then,
the next block will go up by 12s and then -- it's just very random and if that could
be a little more systematic it helps us find the houses quicker as we are going
down the street if we know that -- that they are going up by a certain numerical
value in the same neighborhood, so -- and I think that's one of the improvements
that will come with the new ordinances. So, yeah, that would be a welcome
change for the future, especially as we grow. I mean I came from a community
that was 300,000 and we started much like Meridian at 35,000 and having those
in place early in the system really helped us deliver our response in a quicker,
more systematic way. So, I do agree.
De Weerd: Thank you. So, just one last question. Is this from this day moving
forward or are you talking about readdressing?
Ricks: No. We are --
De Weerd: Oh, thank you.
Ricks: Madam Mayor -- I'm sorry. No. And I emphasize the no. We are not
talking about readdressing. We are talking about making a change going
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 12 of 45
forward. We have had standard addressing guidelines that we have -- that we
have pretty much followed through the last -- I don't know how many years -- five
or six years, which can be pretty consistent, but, really, without the ordinance to
back us up, you know, when we come up against a hard place that we are left
dangling, because we -- you know, we have these standard addressing
guidelines, but nothing -- nothing in the ordinance and so our desire is not to
reinvent the wheel. We don't want to inconvenience the residents or tenants, the
business people. What we want to do is help police and fire. We want to help
dispatch help our police and fire and emergency response personnel. We want
to be a good neighbor to Boise, to the county, and in going forward we need to
not only -- I mean I looked at the growth from '74 to now and I think 43 -- 43
years from now where we will be. Hopefully we won't be looking at an ordinance
that was -- that was codified into 2017. Hopefully, we will be more up to date at
that time, too. But -- but our point is that we want to -- going forward make sure
that we are not providing things that would be inconsistent with county
addressing standards and dispatch. I also -- Madam Mayor. I would like to say
that we are -- in the past our ordinance for street and address numbering has
been in conflict with UDC and we would -- planning would be requesting
amendment to the UDC to bring it all in compliance with each other.
De Weerd: Well, I think this Council looks forward to having it come back and
hearing from the BCA and having them weigh in and see what their feedback is
and, then, looking at it for adoption.
Ricks: Okay. Thank you.
B. Community Development: Attachment of Sidewalk
Barriers Downtown
De Weerd: Thank you, Terri. Okay. Also under Community Development I
believe that -- Caleb is the next presenter. Item 7-B is regarding attachment of
sidewalk barriers in our downtown.
Hood: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Madam Mayor, you
weren't here last week, but it was pretty successful in proposing a code
amendment to the Council and so we thought we would come back this week
with another proposed code amendment, so -- now, that's a joke. Sorry. No.
Bird: We knew it was.
Hood: So, this one, hopefully, is a little bit cleaner and more straightforward.
De Weerd: Currently we don't have as many people in the audience.
Hood: Yeah. This -- this one is actually in Title 8, not in Title 11. It's u nder the
public ways section of city code. Currently we -- we have three different zones,
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 13 of 45
we call the use zone, the clear zone, and the street furnishing zone for, basically,
the sidewalk realm downtown. In the use zone, which is what it sounds like, it's
to allow the adjacent property owner or tenant the ability to put some things out
on the sidewalk area to use as kind of an extension of their store front or their
restaurant or whatever. We currently allow nonpermanent or movable things out
there. So, you can't place anything more permanently in the sidewalk itself. So,
this would allow amenities or barriers or fences in this case to be affixed to -- to
the buildings to other streetscape improvements to kind of secure them in the
ground. So, again, barriers is the -- the main amenity -- we classify that as an
amenity. It doesn't require that that be secured that way, but it allows it to be that
way. So, the proposed change would be to allow this -- a permanent installation
of barriers downtown with a use zone encroachment permit. What we would
require if a business owner or proprietor wants to install a barrier in the sidewalk
or affix it to other streetscape improvements or buildings is a plan and with that
plan the director may require a surety, may require as a condition of approval
that it be put back in the same manner that you found it before you installed the
barrier. So, if the sidewalk is damaged you got to fix the sidewalk as you -- you
know, cut the bolts off to remove this in the future , that you make it again flush or
whatever those requirements may be. So, a lot of mays in this. There is
discretion in this from the director to require a surety to make sure the
construction goes well. It's pretty straightforward and, again, there is just about
ten lines of change. I didn't even make any slides for this presentation today. I
did share the proposed changes with -- with MDC, Ashley, and, then, the MDBA.
Marty Schindler is here and Nick were both informed of these changes. I have
talked to Marty a little bit about it, but I don't think he has any necessarily
concerns, but he's here and, if you will, Madam Mayor and Council, I think he
does want to address you and would stand for anybody else in the audience that
has any comments on this. But, again, pretty straightforward. We are trying to --
trying to help here and allow, again, where a business wants to put in a barrier,
allow them a means to actually secure something in the -- in the public realm.
So, with that, Madam Mayor, I will stand for any questions you may have.
De Weerd: I guess my only question is I believe the fencing that had been out in
front of Busted Shovel was just a stand. They didn't drill it into the sidewalk.
Wouldn't it be less disruptive to have them attach it to their building instead of the
sidewalk, so that if -- if there is damage done they -- we don't have public
hazards or nuisance.
Hood: Yeah. Madam Mayor, I fully intend -- you know, if -- as these businesses
talk with us -- because they will have to fill out an application. Certainly want to
encourage them that direction to either figure out another way to affix it -- again,
maybe even to their building. That can keep it fairly secure if your -- if you put
the bolts into the side of the building. Maybe there is something else. You know,
just walking downtown Boise a couple of weeks ago a lot of those are loose , they
have got a plate that -- you know, that's on the sidewalk that keeps them from
tipping over and it keeps them fairly secure. But I mean if you push on it you
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 14 of 45
could move it. But they do wrap -- at least some of them wrapped -- like the LED
lights -- rope lights kind of through them to kind of keep them all together in
panels. So, I guess to answer your question, Madam Mayor, I would encourage
folks to not use that as the first resort, to go drilling into the sidewalk, but if that's
something they are concerned about, they certainly -- again, there is -- it's an
option for them to do so, provided we are comfortable with the ways that they are
going to construct it and that we are set for when it goes away that we have got
some insurance it will be, again, put back the way they found it. So, that's kind of
how I envision this working. We will have a dialogue.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Marty, do you have any comments? Okay. Thank you.
Nary: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I only have one slight concern I
think from a risk standpoint, because we do occasionally get tort claims in
regards to activities on the sidewalk or injuries that occur on the sidewalks and
sometimes they are our responsibility, sometimes they are not. But the idea, as
you're mentioning, about attaching it to the building is probably safer from the
city's perspective, because I think everything in this ordinance that Caleb and
Legal have coordinated and put together works really well as long as the
business is still there. If the business vacates, they are probably not going to be
real concerned about taking this stuff down or removing it and so if the next
owner doesn't want it and they take these things out of the sidewalk, most of
them are attached by a bolt that is driven into the sidewalk and so we were
talking about it this morning and those sometimes aren't removed , they are
sometimes just cut down and sheared off and ground down to the same level as
the sidewalk. Well -- and someone has to do that, because, otherwise, you're
going to have bolts sticking up out of the sidewalk and that's my only concern is
that all of this is really geared towards assisting the businesses that are there,
but I'm just really a little bit concerned about what happens if they vacate and
don't remove any of this stuff . That will, then, fall on the city to have that done or
have it removed if the next property -- or tenant doesn't want to use that space.
So, that's one thing that maybe we need to talk about a little bit more internally,
but that's one thing that came to my mind today that we haven't really addressed
that yet, so -- attaching to the building doesn't cause that, so --
De Weerd: Okay. Feedback from Council?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 15 of 45
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Bill brought up an awful good point on that. I know the ones over in Boise
-- a lot of them are secured and a lot of them aren't. You can secure them down
to the cement with a little deal that you just take the screw out and it's even there,
but you have to fill it up and when you start going -- working on concrete you, you
know, if you take it out, then, you got the moisture and stuff going in and -- so, I
don't know. I think -- I think we need to maybe look -- brought up a real good
point of when the existing owner leaves what does the new one do.
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: I was sitting here thinking the same thing. However, this being a last
resort type of -- of way of putting the fences up, it seems that there is -- there has
got to be something that we can do, whether it's have them put a deposit down,
depending on the project they are doing, based on how many holes they are
drilling and figure out how much it's going to cost and, then, when they sell their
business or at some point in time they get that back. I don't know how else to
guarantee that they would cover the cost of removing that. Also have no idea
how much the cost is, so -- it might be such a small amount that it's not worth
even worrying about. It might be great, so those questions I think need to be
answered.
Little Roberts: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: I'm thinking that we definitely want to explore it further, because
as we are trying to work on downtown and revitalizing it , one of the ways that we
can help participate in that is give businesses opportunity to be outside and have ,
you know, that energy that's outside. When we have mentioned Boise several
times, when you're walking around and things are downtown and people are
outside dining and having beverages and things like that, it just encourages that
energy and I think that's one of the things we are really trying to do downtown is
encourage that energy and so I'd like to figure out -- really work on how we can
protect the city and still make this happen.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: I couldn't agree more. I wouldn't worry about the cost of getting it out. I
mean the intent should be to incentivize and make it as easy as possible for
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 16 of 45
downtown businesses to provide this amenity for the public. So, we will continue
to review it and see what problems may occur, but whatever we can do to make
it as easy as possible for businesses to get these things up, I think that's where
we ought to be focused. So, the idea of a surety and posting deposits might be
unnecessary barriers to encourage that type of development of their business.
Hood: And Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes.
Hood: If I may, we had those same conversations as we were -- we were
drafting this and we didn’t want to go too far with -- yes, we want to limit risk to
the city, but we also want to encourage this to happen and we didn't want to have
too many things where now it's cost prohibitive for a business -- we hope no
business goes out of business downtown. So, holding 500 bucks for 20 years or
30 years -- who is going to remember that they even deposited it. So, we had
those conversations. At the end of the day -- I appreciate Mr. Nary's comments,
but at the end of the day the other attorneys I worked with -- you know, we have
kind of balanced that and that's where we ended up was not requiring it.
Certainly if you want to we can, but that's sort of along Councilm an Borton's train
of thought was let's not make this too difficult to get it in. Although I will go back
to my comments that I had for the Mayor previously, we hope we don't ever have
to use this, because we are just talking about when someone wants to do it
permanently and we will try to encourage them to put it into their building or
somewhere else, instead of the sidewalk first. But I understand -- as a taxpayer I
don't really want to have to pay to fix that either, so there is a line there. But I jus t
want to let you know we had that conversation internally as well.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I think we need to get Caleb to get this with Legal drawn up with the ideas
that's here and, you know, we have really -- as Ann said, we really promoted this
for downtown let's don't make it a stumbling block for them, so they can get it
going. Let's give it a try. It's been very successful in Boise, Idaho.
De Weerd: Okay. We look forward to seeing how you draw it all up.
Hood: So, Madam Mayor, just a little more direction, then, if I can. We have --
we have a draft ordinance in front of you, so -- yeah, I don't know what else --
De Weerd: So, I guess, Council, any changes to it? I was wondering how you
were going to do that without --
Milam: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 17 of 45
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: So -- and, again, I -- I agree. I don't want to put up extra barriers to
businesses and chances are if somebody sells a business and it's a restaurant,
it's probably going to remain a restaurant. The new owners are going to want
that there anyway. And it would just be nice to know what is the cost of that
before we just toss our hats out. Do you have any idea? Is 500 dollars, is that
the cost that you mentioned or --
Hood: Madam Mayor, Council Woman Milam, it kind of depends and that's -- this
process it depends on how they are -- you know, how many bolts are going in,
how they are affixing it. Is it -- you know, are they saw cutting, are they drilling,
you know, is it an epoxy in the hole with the bolt and we could sheer it off or just
saw cut it off at grade, is it going to be a full removal of that section of concrete --
I mean there is a lot of -- a lot of variables that probably go into that. But at the
time of proposal we would get an estimate of what it would -- estimated costs and
hold the surety for at least that first year to make sure it doesn't fail . I'm thinking
-- you know, just to ballpark something, it's not going to be in the thousands of
dollars. I mean if we have to re-pour the concrete, yeah, now we are talking
bigger dollars. But it's going to be, you know, in the hundreds of dollars. We
probably would even have in-house staff -- again, if we are talking about just, you
know, saw cutting it off or grinding it down to grade, it could probably be done
with existing resources probably. But, again, it does -- it does depend on what's
being installed.
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: That sounds doable to me and you guys are going to be the ones
approving the plans, so --
De Weerd: Marty, please, join us. Okay. Well, don't talk until you get to the
microphone. If you will, please, state your name.
Schindler: Martin Schindler. Property owner. 126 East Idaho Avenue.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Schindler: Let me back up and say -- Caleb, just to help plan it out here a bit, but
maybe a simple way to do it is to come up with a typical section for adherence to
the concrete, which I really truly believe the plate idea is a great one . Typically
on the length -- the run of that railing there would, then, be some security that
renews to answer those questions for risk management on your side of the
equation. There are calculations out there already and I would be glad to help
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 18 of 45
Caleb with that, supply him some information to support that. But I would think
that the removal side of it would be held to the individual tenant , because as a
property owner I wouldn't want to sign for what they are doing, but I would make
sure that on the recourse of when their lease was up or if they terminated the
lease, that there is some money -- some funding to support taking it down and
putting it away or throwing it in the trash, whatever it may be. Hopefully it could
be recycled, but that's hard to say. But I think there is a set of typicals already in
place that we are headed down the road for the style, the design of it, so we don't
get an eclectic look throughout the city of different railings styles would be also
one of my desires. Personally I'm talking now. But it -- also we haven't talked
with city planners about that -- you know, how does that take place and I know
that we are all kind of stretched for time, but I see -- hopefully -- and I'm talking a
little ahead of myself here, but on behalf of the DBA that at some point as we
expand our -- our membership base and our supporting group , that we will be
able to take some of these responsibilities along with the city to help the -- to
oversee design, because I just don't see at typical levels that we have today, with
the amount of employees at hand, to take all these over-the-counter applications
and maybe later on we could help assist with that process, to oversee a design,
have an architectural committee that actually would take a look at -- a second
look at it for you and, then, make suggestions to the planner on our behalf of
what we recommend. So, those are the things out in the future, but to answer
the question at hand, I think a typical post standard is -- would be desired, so we
can come up with it. If it's 15 dollars or 20 dollars per post per section per linear
footage and some of those run as far as ten foot in between posts, we can come
up with a set of standards quickly to have a standard fee that's throughout the
city core. That would be my suggestion.
Hood: So, Mayor, just a couple of things that Mr. Schindler just brought up. So,
first of all, we do have already in the same section of code design . We do -- it
does need to be black wrought iron sectional fencing between 36 and 48 inches
in height. That's it. It's not going to be eclectic. It's -- the standard is already on
the books. And the other point about a typical cross-section, we discussed that,
too, with ACHD and there isn't one. They don't have a typical -- again, you can
put plates down, you can put bolts -- there are different ways to affix these that
they would allow and approve. I guess I'm not opposed to having one standard,
but we are going to get somebody in that doesn’t like that standard and wants to
do something else. So, I don't see the benefit of adding that to this code. It
doesn't address the question or the concern, unless we are really going to
encourage people to -- to put these in the ground and say you have to put them
in the ground. If we say you have to put them in the ground, I think we do have a
standard and it says use four bolts that are this long and go this deep in the
concrete and we explore that again . But ACHD didn't have one and, really,
again, we don't even really want to see th ese in the concrete. So, I'm not totally
opposed to it, I just don't see the value in it.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 19 of 45
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: The only -- the only -- Caleb, you come up with a good idea. You know,
you can use a 12 or 14 screw with a led plug and you -- you have only -- you
have only drilled a 3/16ths or a quarter inch hole. My main concern is just don't
let them shoot it down with the ram sets or something like that , because -- and
you are going to tear some concrete up if you ever take them down. As long as
they are put down that way I don't -- I don't see any bit of problem with it.
De Weerd: Do you have anything else you wanted to add, Marty?
Schindler: Not at this time, Madam Mayor.
De Weerd: Thank you. Thank you for being here. Any other comments from
anyone in our audience? Okay. Council?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I don't know if under Section 2-D or 2-E -- Caleb, this is a question for you.
And asking for all that stuff, do you think it's going to scare anybody off?
Hood: So, Madam Mayor --
Bird: Like you said earlier, who is going to remember that there is a warranty
surety there?
Hood: Madam Mayor, Councilman Bird, I hope not and that's one of the reasons
I shared it with folks like Marty is to look at it and say, hey, do any of these look
too problematic. Again, saying, you know, that's not the only side of that
equation, but we would like to know from your side does this look too onerous.
The second part of your question about -- I would hope in one year we can
remember that. So, for one year we can track things. I get worried when it's 20
years later or even five or ten years later to remember that. But this use and
encroachment permit is an annual permit. It's free. It's right now one of the only
free applications that we offer in community development. But that's another,
again, a carrot. We are trying to encourage this type of stuff downtown. So, we
process it for free, but we also require you to come in and get it every year. So,
after that first year you have had it, you come in, we release your surety back, we
issue a new permit for the next year, assuming there hasn't been any problems.
So, that's why I'm not -- from my perspective I don't think this is too onerous, but
you just ask somebody that wears the other hat to sit down and he may have
other issues, but I really haven't heard those as I shared it with him and -- and,
you know, how much it was shared with other members of the MDBA, but we got
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 20 of 45
it to Nick and said, hey, the city is proposing these, any concerns, and I haven't
heard any -- there is a question about smoking within them . I think that came up.
But that -- that's not -- that's not here, but other than that, no, I don't think -- my
personal opinion, no, I don't think this is too much to scare somebody away.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: With that, Caleb, I would say if you -- if you feel comfortable with it, these
permits are only for a year, I would say let's go for it. Let's get -- let's get it going.
Let's get some things out there.
Hood: Mr. Bird, I appreciate that. I'm pretty confident if we get burned I will be
right back before you. You know, let's give them a little rope here and say, you
know, do the right thing. You know, we are trying to help you out here. Help us
help you. But I will be back here saying, you know what, we have had to repair
three of these last year and it's a thousand bucks a pop. Let's change the way
we do this. I won't let it get to three, but -- let's try it and see if it works.
Bird: Do her.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: I had one question, Caleb. The -- the strike through language in 1-B
says except as otherwise specifically set forth in this chapt er, so -- but I don't see
any other strike through language. So, prior to this proposed revision how was it
otherwise set forth in the chapter that would have allowed permanent
streetscape.
Hood: So, Madam Mayor, Councilman Borton, it's not. So, there isn't -- there
wasn't any exceptions to the rule. You just couldn't permanently put anything in
the use zone.
Borton: Madam Mayor. But our code -- it had that phrase in it?
Hood: Except as otherwise specially --
Borton: As otherwise provided in the chapter? Is that right?
Hood: I have got the code up here.
Borton: The only reason I ask is it implied to me that we did it a different way
before and this is not new, it's just a change to how it was previously permitted.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 21 of 45
Hood: So, we do allow some things without a permit. I'm trying to see if any of
those are actually permanent fixtures, chairs, planters, cooling appliances,
bicycle racks -- it says movable bicycle racks.
Borton: And if it's nothing, that's fine, I just read as though there might have
been something else.
Hood: I can follow up with you, Councilman Borton, but I -- again generally
things shouldn't -- before or currently permanently placed in the use zone were
not allowed.
De Weerd: So, what I'm hearing, Caleb, is that there is general agreement to
bring it back and move forward.
Hood: As an ordinance or you want it as -- okay. Thank you.
C. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY2017 in the
Amount of $1,050,000.00 for JC Constructors’ Contract
for the WRRF Capacity Expansion Construction Project
De Weerd: Okay. Item 7-C is under Public Works. A budget amendment.
These next three are. So, I will turn this over to Warren.
Stewart: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council.
De Weerd: You drew the short straw.
Stewart: Well, I'm going to address two of them, but Laurelei is going to do the
middle one. So, this first item, Item C, is a budget amendment -- just a little
budget amendment for about a million dollars for the capac ity projects out at the
wastewater treatment plant. As you know, we have started construction on that
project. It's been going on now for quite a few weeks and it's going quite well,
but in our relationship and coordination with the contractor , we have been
discussing some of the long lead item things that are in the project, as well as
rising costs associated with some of the different materials that are out there,
because construction is increasing, as well as our need to make sure that this
project is completed within the 30 months time frame that's allowed for this
project and in discussing those things with them -- and it's become apparent that
it would be advantageous for us to move some of the money in this project a little
forward in the timeline. So, it's a three year project. We had at the beginning of
the project estimated how much we would spend in year one and two and three
and it's now becoming apparent that it would be advantageous for us to move
some of that money forward. The overall cost of the project will not change.
That's not what we are here to discuss. It's still the overall cost remains the
same. But what we are talking about is moving some of the money up from later
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 22 of 45
to earlier to make sure that we meet the timelines associated with the project and
take advantage of pricing and so forth that we need now. To accommodate this
we have gone through and combed our existing budget for 2017 and looked for
opportunities to reallocate funds from existing projects where we have saved
some money, either because the projects have come in under budget or they
have bid out significantly under budget. We also have a few where because of
some proposed development in the community we have been able to,
essentially, abandon projects that we had scheduled, because development will
allow us to do that. Developers are going to -- essentially, one of them was a lift
station that we were going to do some improvements to and now the
development community is going to come along within the next couple of years
and allow us to completely eliminate that lift station. So, the money we had
allocated for that we no longer will need. We are going to just postpone that
expenditure. So, we are going to reallocate some funds to allow us to take this,
essentially, one -- a little over a million dollars out of this year's budget with a no
net increase to the 2017 budget and, essentially, move some of that money up
into this year that would have been spent in 2019 for this capacity project and
that's, essentially, what we are asking for is your permission to do that. And I will
stand for any questions.
De Weerd: Thank you, Warren. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: So, Warren, is it a -- does the -- the new expenditure accelerate the
schedule or does the new expenditure cover increased costs for the existing
schedule? The reason I ask is if 2009 monies are moved forward to keep it on
schedule and moving fast, is sort of how it reads, that seems to imply that it's not
necessarily capturing additional costs for the same work , but trying to get what
might have been done in future budget years done earlier .
Stewart: Yeah. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Borton --
so, essentially, the contractor is concerned, as are we, that with the current
yearly annual expenditures that we had originally planned for , that it's going to
put a lot of strain on that last year to complete a significant amount of work in a
very short time period. Whereas if we can move that up into this -- into earlier in
the project we can order some material that's long lead item stuff that is going to
have an impact or could have an impact on the schedule . It will also allow us to
save some money in the project, particularly the contractor is save some money,
because pricing on certain items is going up and up and up, especially pipe costs
for HDPE pipe is really skyrocketing right now and it's just going to allow us as a
city to feel more confident and comfortable that we are going to be able to meet
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 23 of 45
that 30 month timeline with the contractor and that's pretty important to us,
because, as you know, we are growing incredibly fast once again and so
although we have created this base where we think we have plenty of time to get
this project done before we need that capacity, it's not going to be very much
after we get this project done that that capacity is going to be necessary. So, this
is sort of providing some -- a little insurance or a little buffer for us to make sure
that we meet those timelines and that we are -- we have the project up, the
system is fully running and functional, before we actually need that capacity. I
don't know if that answered your question or not.
Borton: Madam Mayor. It did. It sounds like it is to a certain degree
compressing the schedule in a good way, trying to get a little bit more done a
little bit faster?
Stewart: Correct.
Borton: Okay. So, if all things being equal, the budget amendment, which I
know were rough -- relatively rough, but the fiscal year 2019 anticipated
expenditure of 6.3 million, should -- we should expect to see that be 5.1 million in
2019?
Stewart: Yes. So, I'm going to look at my numbers here. So, I guess the quick
and easy way to answer that is the increase in the money that we are putting in
this year will be a reduction in 2019. That's correct. So, the overall cost is still 35
million dollars and some change. It hasn't changed the overall cost of the project
at all. Just taking the 2019 money and moved it up.
Borton: Okay.
De Weerd: So, it didn't add to it, it just moves money forward.
Borton: That helps. And Madam Mayor. That -- okay.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Anybody don't have any more questions, I think this is a good sign that JC
has a little -- accelerated their schedule a little bit and maybe we can get some
decent costs on some pipe and stuff. So, I would move that we approve the
budget amendment for JC Contractors to the tune of 1,050,000 dollars.
Milam: Second.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 24 of 45
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you
call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, absent; Palmer, absent;
Little Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT.
D. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY 2017 in the
Amount of $60,316 for Repair of Sewer Infrastructure
De Weerd: Item 7-D is also public -- or a budget amendment for repairs to our
infrastructure. Laurelei.
McVey: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, thank you so much for your
time this afternoon. So, what I'm bringing before you today is a no net increase
budget amendment and this is to repair cracked sewer service T's in the Tuscany
Subdivision. So, what a sewer service T is where the homeowner's line comes in
and where it meets our main line and the city is responsible for that section of
pipe. So, when Tuscany was constructed -- that was back in 2005 to 2007, we
allowed a different type of sewer service T? Since the construction of Tuscany
and realizing that our sewer service T's put at those deep depths struggled with
the pressure of the soil, we have since changed our requirements to require a
more heavy duty T. However, now we are going back with our in-house program
we have been able to TV all of these sections and realize that these things are
happening and what a cracked sewer service T will do is -- the biggest problem is
that it allows groundwater infiltration and that's clean water that enters the sewer
system that travels to the treatment plant that takes up capacity, it takes up
resources to treat, and so we try really hard to keep those out . Additionally, if
those cracked sewer service T's get bigger, sewage can actually leach out and
cause potential contamination. So, our goal is to find those and fix them before
that happens. So, we were able to -- earlier this year fix five of these service T's
and we were able to look at our budget and we think we can prioritize some of
the spending for the rest of the fiscal year to fix the remaining 12 T's that are
cracked in that subdivision. So, what I am asking for is approval of a no net
increase budget amendment to, essentially, reallocate existing funds to cover this
repair project.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none. Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 25 of 45
Bird: Seeing no questions, I move we approve the budget amendment for fiscal
year 2017 in the amount of 60,316 dollars for the repair of sewer infrastructure.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Do I have any discussion? Mr. Clerk,
will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, absent; Palmer, absent;
Little Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
E. Public Works: Approval of Contract Completion Letter
with Travelers pertaining to the default of Performance
System, Incorporated on the City’s “UV Disinfection
Improvements” contract dated July 14, 2015 and
payment of retainage to Travelers in the amount of
$11,900.35
De Weerd: Okay. Item 7-E is under Public Works for approval of contract
completion letter and, Warren, is up.
Stewart: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, thank you. So, I'm kind of
helping tag team just a little bit with Keith. He's, obviously, out this week and so I
will try and explain this as best I can . The UV disinfection facility expansion
project is one that we just completed this past year. But you may recall that at
the very end of the project the contractor for that particular project actually went
bankrupt and left a small portion of the project unfinished . Essentially some
asphalt that needed to be put back in. So, we had to initiate the bonding
company, who backed to the contractor, bringing them into the project and work
out a resolution with them to complete the balance of the work and what has,
essentially, happened with that asphalt work is they have -- the bonding company
has obtained a quote for the asphalt work and has paid the city the value of that
quote and, then, the city has obtained another quote to complete that work from
the same contractor. Ironically, they gave us a better deal than they did the
bonding company. But in any case we are going to have that contractor come in
and complete that asphalt work within the -- the coming month. What this is
really all about is we held -- withhold a certain percentage of the invoices that the
contractor submits all the way through the project. We call it retainage. And,
essentially, now that there is a resolution to this issue -- issue, we would -- this is
about releasing that retainage money to the bonding company. It's, essentially,
letting that money that we have been holding on the project go back to the
bonding company. So, that's kind of what this is about and that's what we are
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 26 of 45
here seeking your approval to do and that will allow us to close this project out,
get the asphalt finally taken care of, and, then, once that -- this particular effort
has been done, we will also be able to receive or close our agreement with the
engineering firm, who will remain nameless, but who had an error in this project.
They owe us about 300,000 dollars that they will also pay us after this is all done.
So, we will get that money back in addition. And with that I will stand for any
questions.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Warren, my figures here -- are we -- are we using asphalt or gold? It says
11,935,000 dollars. That's -- that's -- that isn't the amount of the amendment.
Borton: Eleven thousand.
Milam: There is zeros on there.
De Weerd: Well, it's just 11,900 point three five point zero zero.
Stewart: There is some funky math there.
Coles: Madam Mayor, there are two extra zeros there. Scrivener's error there.
It's $11,900.35.
Bird: Madam Mayor. I would move that we approve the completion letter to
Travelers pertaining to the default of performance system for the amount of
$11,900.35.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: Do you want to include the 35 cents?
Milam: It's on there.
Borton: It's a set sum.
De Weerd: Any discussion? Mr. Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, absent; Palmer, absent;
Little Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 27 of 45
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: A future meeting topic, in case they might leave, Laurelei, thank you for
the information in the packet. It would be great to hear an update at a later date
with the camera and the two trucks in the cleaning and how the schedule has
accelerated and where we are at with that at a future time. That was helpful
here.
F. Clerk’s Office: Paws in the Park Follow Up Report
De Weerd: Item 7-F, we get an update -- Paws in the Park, a wildly successful
first annual event.
Coles: All right. Make my way to the podium. Thank you, Madam Mayor,
Members of the Council. We have both mics now and they are both seeming to
work, so that's good. I will use this one I think. As the Mayor said, the first Paws
in the Park event was extremely successful. It was unexpectedly successful.
We were surprised, astounded and amazed and happily surprised, actually, with
the turnout of the amount of people we had at the park. I just want to show some
pictures real quick before I get into the numbers of those that came and the
number of licenses that we issued. We had a doggy photo booth at the event
that dog owners could use and sit on this bench. That board behind them says I
love you or I heart you because -- then the dog owners could write something
about their pet if they wanted to. So, you can see I heart you because you give
good snuggles there on the right. I heart you because you love me with all those
dogs. Or excuse me. On the left. On the right because you love me. We had
both -- we had vendors both large and small at that event , so -- on the left in the
foreground is Percy's Bows. That individual he said that he sold more bows at
this three hour event than -- he was at another event that took place over an
entire weekend and he sold more bows for dogs at our event than he did over the
entire weekend at another event. And in the background I have another picture
of Costco you can see, but in the background Costco came to our event and,
then, we had some live music, some acoustic guitarists there on the right. There
is another photo of Costco. They brought samples of all of their dog food and
they did a big giveaway of that dog bed you see there in the corner. They gave
that away to some lucky winner -- some lucky winner of a drawing. The Meridian
Canine Rescue, which is recently started, but restarted under another name.
They brought some dogs there -- some adoptable dogs that individuals could
interact with. There was a food truck, the Rusty Dog, there in the background
and, then, here is licenses, so you can see our staff there on the left and, then,
on the right you can see the line of folks that were lined up to get licenses. So,
that kind of leads into the numbers game here. Total we issued 224 licenses in
that three hour time frame on that Saturday. I was -- I was thinking -- the number
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 28 of 45
I had in my head was one hundred. I thought if we did a hundred licenses, man,
that would have been a great success. Others were -- you know, thought if we
had ten people show up that would have been a great success. But, no, 224 is
what we issued. So, that's 74 an hour. That's more than one a minute,
obviously. We had -- we had four stations, if you will, going nonstop. We had
two computers and, then, two that were handwriting licenses and, then, we had a
fifth once the line got really backed up , Jaycee Holman jumped in every now and
then when the line was just so long that we couldn't get to everyone that we had
a fifth line going every now and then . Of the 224, 32 had been in our system
before, so they were repeat customers, if you will. But 192 were first-time
licenses within our system that we issued that day.
De Weerd: Congratulations --
Coles: Yes. Thank you.
De Weerd: -- on that. That's awesome.
Coles: The feedback we have received has been mostly positive. We received
one negative e-mail before the event asking for a refund, because they didn't
know about the event and wanted a refund and wanted to attend the event for
free. And, then, we received some feedback from -- there is a daycare that is
right next to Storey Bark Park. The owner of that daycare he had posted --
posted signage saying no parking, individuals had parked on his property
anyway, so he was upset about that. There is a more deep-seated issue there.
He has reported to the Parks Department before that dog owners there, while
they at the dog park, they will scoop up their poop, instead of throwing it in the
trash, they will throw it over the fence into his property. So, we have contacted
him, we have spoken with him, and the Parks Department and they want to work
with him to mitigate what's happening there, obviously, with the dog owners
doing that while they are at the dog park. But also get his feedback if we
continue to do this event in the future how he would be willing to help , what his
ideas, suggestions are in terms of parking and accommodating that number of
people. We weren't expecting that number of people. So, anyway, we are in
contact with him. From the vendors we sent out -- and now asking for feedback
from the vendors that were there. Did they think it was worth their time? Did
they enjoy themselves? Did they do business like Percy Bows did? I want to
share one -- or part of an e-mail we got back. We had Aussie Mobile Grooming.
They are doing nail trimming for dogs. They were astounded at the event as
well. So, I will read in part their e-mail to us. They said they were overwhelmed
with the success and turnout. Totally unexpected. We had two groomers who
worked constantly on nail trims. We averaged one trim every six minutes over
the three hours without a single break. They also were pleased with our pre-
event exposure over TV, radio, blogs and print. We didn't pay for any TV
advertising. We didn't pay for any radio advertising. We sent out a press
release, Kaycee Emery. We worked with her to notify the media of what was
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 29 of 45
happening. It did get picked up by some news outlets. Also Shelly Houston, the
marketing coordinator in the Parks Department, helped us advertise, because the
event was in a park. So, with the help of those two, we got lots of people out to
the event. So, we were happy with that. So, with this, with all this information, it
is my recommendation -- the Council asked that I come with a recommendation
of what to do in the future. We had an after-action meeting with the group that
helped plan and execute this event. We do recommend that we continue this
event or some version of it moving forward. It may not be free licenses every
year, because, then, everyone is going to wait for the free licensing event and the
next year it's going to be a thousand people getting licenses -- 2,000 licenses
that we issue, but -- so, we are working on maybe how that looks in the future,
but, obviously, there is interest in dog licensing. For us it was an opportunity to
educate the community -- the 192 that weren't in our system prior to that event.
We felt like it was successful in bringing government and services to the people
where they congregate. Dog owners like to congregate with other dog owners
and they like to be at the dog park. So, we felt it was a great opportunity to bring
our service out of City Hall, bring it to the dog park where they are going to be
located, so we could offer the service of licensing there. So, we will continue to
work through some of the kinks that we did have , some of the details of an event
like this moving forward, so it's not just free licenses every year, but we do think
something like this, bringing the service out of City Hall at least once a year to
where dog owners are located to license their dogs is something worthwhile and
worth our time. So, with that I thank you for allowing us to do this event this year,
to explore this opportunity, and I will stand for any questions that you might have.
De Weerd: You know, I would first like to congratulate Shelly. I think this is the
master mind behind this event and that you saw an opportunity to really build our
license program. So, I still think we need signage at the dog park that licenses
are required. But next year I guess I would like to see it where you can offer the
licenses, that they would have to pay, but anyone who has a license prior to the
event may be the sponsors give some kind of a gift. You have some kind of
recognition of bag of dog bones or, you know, dog biscuits or something that is
covered by the sponsors. But you're recognizing good behavior, just like we do
with our dogs, they get a dog treat. But I think that that way you are recognizing
that they have licensed their dog, they are being a responsible owner, and we
want to celebrate that, but that you still should offer the licensing in case
someone forgot and -- but they don't get the dog biscuits or whatever. That's --
that would be my two cents.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: Part of your -- your exploration going forward -- we had talked a little bit
offline about the private nonprofit event that 's in Kleiner Park two weeks prior, the
Helping Hand Fund, which raises funds to the Canine Rescue and a few other
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 30 of 45
entities that all support this and its a really big event, a whole bunch of activities,
and whether or not what's provided here could become part of a private event
that already exists versus the city having to run their own, at least explore the
pros and cons of that.
Coles: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Borton, we did
discuss that very briefly at our after action with our group, that that would be
something that we would look at further if the event moved forward .
Borton: Okay. Awesome.
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes, Mrs. Milam.
Milam: Did you -- I don't know if you covered it or not, C.Jay, but did you have an
estimate for the -- what you think would be the total number of attendees at this
event?
Coles: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Milam --
De Weerd: Two legged or four legged?
Milam: Two legged.
Coles: Well, that was something that I wanted -- if I would have had an
opportunity to get up and walk around at all I was going to make some sort of
estimate there. I never left that table. None of us were able to because of the
amount of people that we were trying to get through with licenses. So, I can't
even give you a guess. It was a lot. There was definitely more than just the
people there getting licenses. I think what was nice about the event was there
were those that came specifically for that purpose, but, then, there were those
that came just to go to a dog park and they saw, oh, hey, I can -- I don't have a
license. I can get my dog license for free on this day and so they came up to our
table to do that. So, there certainly were more than just the 224 or their owners
that were there. It was -- it was a lot of people and dogs there for that three hour
period.
Milam: Madam Mayor? And so did the vendors pay a fee to participate?
Coles: They did not.
Milam: That might be another idea, if the vendors pay a small fee that would
help cover the cost of the licenses at least. That way you're still able to do either
a discounted license or the free license or discounted or bonus for reregistering.
But the whole idea -- because the concept is great and the whole idea is to get
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 31 of 45
more dogs registered. It's not about the profits. But also there is a cost involved.
So, if you could get the vendors to cover the cost involved and people can get
their dogs register, which is the whole point in the first place, I think it's a win-win.
Just a thought.
Coles: Absolutely. This year we had no idea what we would expect, but that's
something for us to look at. Absolutely.
Milam: Congratulations.
Coles: Thank you.
De Weerd: So, how many dogs do we have licensed?
Coles: I'm guessing that -- the last look -- I looked at that spreadsheet a few
days ago. It was around 2,500, I believe.
De Weerd: We know there is more.
Bird: Great.
Coles: The estimation is somewhere between 17 and 20 thousand dogs --
De Weerd: I know.
Coles: -- in the city.
Little Roberts: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: Madam Mayor, C.Jay, probably a really strange question, but do
you know how many years the average dog is licensed?
Coles: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Little Roberts, I
don't, but I can get that information and get that back to you if you would like.
Little Roberts: Thank you. Madam Mayor. Just curious, because if we do give
them a free license and, then, they continue licensing the dog, we are still way
ahead of the game. I think you can almost build a public education campaign,
too, that -- and this is -- I guess here is an argument in support of the free license
-- is because it saves considerable time finding the owner. At this point you have
personnel, when a dog is picked up, spend -- can spend up to ten hours trying to
locate the owner and, then, if they are unable to and it's not adopted out, of
course, there is additional cost to what do you do with the dog . So, there -- there
is definitely a cost that is minimized if you have the dog license and you can
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 32 of 45
reunite it with the owner. So, there is -- there is an argument for that. Thank
you, C.Jay.
Coles: Thank you.
De Weerd: And thank you, Shelly. This is -- you know, we know that you have
taken a personal interest in -- it should be Shelly's Bark Park, not the Storey Bark
Park.
Bird: That's a good one.
De Weerd: But, anyway, I appreciate the heart you put into this. It's awesome,
so --
G. Mayor’s Office: MYAC Budget Amendment Not To
Exceed $6,660
De Weerd: Okay. Next is the Mayor's Office.
Simison: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The first item I
have up before you today is a budget amendment from MYAC. This is our end of
the year budget amendment, which is from the funds that they have raised from
their events throughout the year. It is also -- they have recently secured verbal
funding for their Youth Safety Summit later this spring from Idaho Power. So,
while we have not yet received those 5 ,000 dollars, we are getting near the time
when we need to do our budget amendments and if for any reason that money
does not come in, we will not do the event like we normally do, but I have every
assurance that the money will come in, so --
De Weerd: We do expect it in September is what I understand.
Simison: Correct. Yes. With that there is an amendment in front of you for
6,660 dollars for additional spending authority for MYAC. I will stand for any
questions.
De Weerd: Any questions from Council?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Seeing none, I would move that we approve the budget amendment for
MYAC in the amount of 6,660 dollars.
Milam: Second.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 33 of 45
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 7-G. Mr. Clerk, will
you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, absent; Palmer, absent;
Little Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT.
De Weerd: Thank you.
H. Mayor’s Office: 2017 City Survey
Simison: Thank you. The second item you have up before us today is -- as you
all are aware, we recently did a city survey. The results of that survey are back
and we have Jason Morado here with ETC Institute, who was the company that
did the survey on our behalf . He's going to run through a presentation for you on
the results of that survey. Once he's done and you guys have asked any
questions you have of him, I will go ahead and hand out a copy of the survey
results for you, so you can have time to review it and we will, then, hopefully, give
you an opportunity for the week and maybe come back next week for -- to accept
the results of the survey, to give you time for any technical or other questions that
may come up. Before he comes up I'm just going to point this out to you from my
very rough, poor math that I just did, 21,615. Anybody want to guess what that
number is?
Milam: Was that --
Bird: That's who --
Milam: How many participated?
Bird: -- participated.
Borton: The number of dogs --
Simison: Based upon just -- based upon my quick rough math and if we -- if I
assume we have 30,000 households in Meridian, which is close and based on
our utility billing and the numbers, that could be the number that could be used,
but we will double-check that. But just I will lead with --
Milam: In my neighborhood they all have three.
De Weerd: That was a great little brain twister there, Robert. Well, welcome,
Jason. Thank you for joining us and thank you for sitting through -- if I would
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 34 of 45
have known that that was you in the back, I would have moved this up on our
agenda.
Morado: That's all right. I learned a lot of great information today about the city.
Anyway, my name is Jason Morado. I am a senior project manager at ETC
Institute and ETC is a marketing and research firm based in the Kansas City area
and the thing that we specialize in is doing citizen surveys for city and county
governments all across the country and it's great to be back in the City of
Meridian. I was here three years ago to present the results of the first citizen
satisfaction survey and today I'm going to go through the results of the most
recent survey and this was administered in April and, then, partially in May. So,
really, just got finished up. So, ETC is based in the Kansas City area, but we are
a national leader in providing market research for local governments. We have
done this type of work for over 30 years and since 2006 we have done surveys in
over 900 communities and 49 states. So, this is really the type of work that we
specialize in. I will go through the purpose and methodology of the survey. Then
I will go over what I call the bottom line up front, which is really our main
conclusions from the survey, and I will go through the major survey findings to
show how we came to those conclusions and I will be happy to answer any
questions if there are any. So, there is several reasons to do a survey like this.
One is to objectively assess what residents think about city services and also
their perceptions of the city and also what their priorities are for the city . Also
with the survey we are going to measure trends from the previous survey in
2014. There were a few new questions this year and also a few questions we
took out, but most of the questions are the same as they were three years ago.
And, then, also with this survey we can see how Meridian stacks up to residents
in other communities, both regionally and nationally. So, this survey was seven
pages long. I mentioned it includes most of the same questions that we asked
before. The survey was administered by a combination of mail, online and phone
to randomly selected households all throughout the city and that's really our
standard methodology for these types of surveys . Our goal is to get at least 500
completed surveys and we had a really, really good response this year. Actually
ended up with 743 completed surveys. Now, one thing we always do when we
administer these surveys is as we are collecting the data we check the
demographics of respondents to make sure it reflects the actual population of the
city and we especially pay close attention to key areas, which is age, gender,
geographic location. So, we had a really good distribution of all those areas and
the results of these 743 surveys, at the 95 percent level of confidence, has a
margin of error of plus to minus 3.6 percent. So, essentially, that means if we did
this survey the same way a hundred times, 95 times the results would be plus or
minus 3.6 percent from what we are reporting. So, the results aren't perfect, but,
really, it's a very small margin of error. So, here you can see we have a map of
the city. The red dots are households that completed the survey. So, we had a
really good distribution throughout the city and this looks very similar to what we
had three years ago when we did the survey. So, here is our major findings. We
found that residents overall have very, very positive perception of the city and
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 35 of 45
there is a lot of examples of that in the survey. I have picked out a couple here
that really stand out. Ninety-three percent of residents rated Meridian as either a
great or a good place to raise a family and 92 percent rated the city is an
excellent or a good place to live. So, really, just about everybody who surveyed
felt that way. We also found that the city is moving in the right direction. Now,
the results were really good three years ago when we did the survey. They are
much higher than both regional and national averages in most areas, but this
year the results are even better. The positive ratings have increased from 64 out
of the 84 areas that we asked last year -- last time as well and we will look at
some of those in just a little bit. We also found that the satisfaction with city
services is much higher in Meridian than it is in other communities and that is no
surprise, because that was the case three years ago and, of course, this year the
results are even a little bit better and we will look at these examples in a little bit,
but the city rated above the US average and also the Mountain region average in
42 out of the 46 areas that we compared and you will see it in a little bit that in a
lot of cases it is much higher, ten, 15, even 20 percent or more. And, then, the
area that really stands out the most is that the satisfaction with the overall quality
of city services for the city rated at 30 percent above the US average, 25 percent
above the Mountain region average and when we do these surveys this is always
a key area we look at, because here we are asking your residents to take into
account everything that the city does. So, this is really an overall satisfaction
rating of city services and, then, the top priorities for residents were road, traffic,
and transportation. Education and schools. And growth development. So, the
first area we will look at is just some general perceptions of the city. Here we
asked residents to rate their perception of the city as you can see in a number of
different ways and this question is asked on a scale of zero to ten, with ten being
excellent, zero is poor. So, you can see here the dark blue are the nines and
tens ratings. The lighter blue are sevens and eights. So, really, the blue were
the positive ratings and every graph that has this 11 point scale has the same
format. A rating of four to six is the white, so that's kind of average. But, then, a
rating of three or less is poor, just the red. So, a couple things stand out here.
One is that the positive ratings far outweigh the negative really in just about every
single area. The only exception is providing mobility options in driving. For
everything else more than 60 percent of residents gave positive ratings, 12
percent or less negative, and the items that really stand out are those two at the
very top. You can see just about everybody who answered the survey feel good
about the city as a place to raise a family and also as a place to live. So, here is
some quality of life questions. Here a ten means of these items greatly exceed
expectations. Zero means doesn't exceed -- doesn't meet expectations at all.
So, again, positive rating far outweigh the negative. The couple that stand out
here the most are those bottom two ones. Eighty percent of residents feel that
customer service from city employees exceeds expectations. Only five percent
feel like it doesn't. And in that bottom row 79 percent of residents feel like the
overall quality of city services exceeds expectations and that's compared to only
three percent who don't feel that way. And those numbers are much, much
higher than we typically see in other communities where we do these surveys.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 36 of 45
Here is some more comparisons for quality of life and perceptions of the city.
Here are a ten means residents strongly agree with these statements. Zero
means they strongly disagree. Again, the positive ratings far outweigh the
negative. The lowest rated item on this list is the city managing growth wisely,
but even for that you have 55 percent positive rating as compared to only 18
percent negative, so more than a three to one ratio of positive to negative. You
can see the highest rated item is the quality of shopping and entertainment being
accessible. Then the other item that really stands out here to me is that fifth one
down. You can see that 69 percent of residents feel like the city is headed in the
right direction, compared to only ten percent who don't. So, about a seven to one
of those who feel the city is headed in the right direction versus those who don't
and that's also a much better ration than we normally see. Normally about two or
three to one is considered about average. And, then, here we asked residents to
rate major categories of city services. You can see here that ten is excellent,
zero is poor. Again, the positive outweighs the negative in all these areas. The
lowest rated item was planning and zoning services, but even for that you have
56 percent positive ratings, compared to only 17 percent negative. And the items
that are rated the highest just start at the top of the list, fire and rescue services,
city parks, garbage trash and pick up services, and police department and law
enforcement. And, then, here we asked residents about the value received for
city tax dollars and fees. Ten means that residents definitely feel like they are
getting their money's worth. Zero means they are definitely not. So, they can
see here that 72 percent of residents feel like they are getting their money's
worth for their city tax dollars and fees, compared to only six percent who don't
feel that way. So, a twelve to one ratio of residents who feel like they are getting
their money's worth versus those who don't and that's also much, much higher
than what we normally see. And, then, here we have a map of the city and what
we did here is broke the results down into four different regions. The northeast,
the northwest, the central and, then, south Meridian. And we took the average
rating for residents in each one of these four areas and, then, shaded that area
the appropriate color. So, this map is for the overall quality of city services and
you can see the entire map is the same color, that light blue. So, that means the
overall quality of city services exceeds expectations in all parts of the city and it
also means the city is really doing a good job providing services equally in all four
areas. Now, we did a map like this for every question that had that 11 point
scale. So, it's over a hundred maps overall and it's really a great way to look at
the data and more detail geographically. So, we also found that the city is
moving in the right direction. So, here what we have -- the blue line are residents
for the 2017 survey rate each item as a seven or better. So, the positive ratings.
The yellow are the positive ratings from three years ago and I put a blue arrow by
the items for the ratings that have increased by at least four percent since the
last survey. Red arrow down means the ratings have decreased by four percent
or more and this -- this graph here is for perceptions of the city. You can see
there is seven areas that have had significant increase in positive ratings since
the last survey. How well the city is ensuring public safety. The city as a place to
work is up eight percent. Building a strong sense of community. Developing
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 37 of 45
strong a local economy. The city is a place to do business. Communication with
the community is up nine percent. Then developing a strong local workforce. So
a lot of increases related to the economy and business . The one area that did
have a decrease of four percent was planning for future growth and
development. Here are the comparisons for quality of life. No significant
changes since the last survey, but for all four areas there has been either a two
or a three percent increase. Here are more quality of life and perception areas.
You can see here there is four areas that have had a significant increase. The
quality of shopping -- shopping and entertainment being accessible. Meridian as
a sense of community. The city using tax dollars wisely is up five percent. And,
then, the variety of employment opportunities is up nine percent. And we did see
a nine percent decrease, though, in the quality of housing in the variety of
options. And these comparisons are from major categories of city services .
Most of these areas saw a small increase, but there were three areas that had a
significant increase. Recreation programs. Programs for youth.
Communications. And, then, there was a four percent decrease in recycling
services. Now, this table is specifically for public safety and there is 12 different
items here. For one item the ratings are the same. For the other 11 the ratings
have increased. So, no decreases at all in any of these areas, which really is
amazing. And there is five areas especially that had a big increase. Fire
response time to emergencies. The location of fire stations. Safety in city parks.
And, then, both fire and police safety education programs. And, then, this chart
here is specifically for parks and recreation. You can see no significant
decreases, but five big increases. The number, quality, and variety of special
events and festivals. The quality and variety of recreation programs and classes.
The availability of community center and gyms is up 13 percent and, then, the
number of pathways for walking and biking is up six percent. And for code
enforcement all of these are pretty similar to the last survey. No significant
increases or decreases. And, then, here is the area that had the most significant
increases overall since the last survey. Items related to communication. All five
of these had an increase of at least seven percent since the last survey.
Usefulness of online services and the website is up 14 percent. Quality of the
city website. Information about city programs and services up 13 percent.
Effectiveness of communication with the public is up 18 percent. That's the area
that had the biggest increase since the last survey. And, then, public
involvement in local decision making. So, we also did some benchmarking
comparisons and see how the city stacks up to residents in other communities.
So, the blue line are the positive ratings for Meridian residents. The red are the
ratings for residents in the Mountain region, which includes the state of Idaho, as
well as several surrounding states. Wyoming. Montana. Utah. And Colorado
was in there. And, then, the yellow are the ratings from residents from across the
US and you can see -- you will see as you go through these in just about every
area Meridian is significantly above both the regional and the national average.
This chart here especially has some really, really positive results. If you start
with that second row down customer service from city employees, 80 percent
positive rating for the city, which is 28 percent above the regional average, more
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 38 of 45
than 30 percent above the national average and just going down the list, overall
quality of city services. So, again, taking into account everything that the city
does. Twenty-five percent above the regional average, 30 percent above the
national. Overall value received for city taxes and fees. You can see that
number is almost double the average for the -- for the US average. More than 30
percent above the regional average. And, then, the city moving in the right
direction, 16 percent above both the regional and the national average. Then
here are comparisons for perceptions of the city. You can see much, much
higher than the benchmarking averages for the city as a place to live and also to
raise a family. Again, the item that stands out here is that bottom row, planning
for future growth and development. Now, that had a four percent decrease from
the last survey, but you can see it's still nine percent above both the regional and
the national average. So, it's down a little bit, but it's still a really good number
compared to other communities. And for major categories of city services, all of
these are significant, but the benchmarking averages -- a couple I wanted to
point out here. Recreation programs and code enforcement are especially far
above the benchmarking averages and, then, that third from the bottom,
recycling services, that also went down a little bit from the last survey, but as you
can see it also is still significantly above both the regional and the national
average. And for public safety, again, just about all of these are significantly
above the benchmarking averages. The ones that especially are far above the
averages, if you look at that fourth one down, overall feeling of safety in the city,
91 percent positive rating from Meridian, more than 20 percent above the
benchmarking averages. Then just going down the list a little bit, how quickly
police respond to emergencies, that's also more than 20 percent above both the
regional and national average. For parks and recreation you can see there is
four areas that are significantly above. One area is significantly below is the
number of pathways for walking and biking, but that did see a six percent
increase in satisfaction from 2014. So, it's still below, but that forty-seven
percent is six percent higher than it was three years ago. So, it's headed in the
right direction. And for code enforcement, all three of these areas significantly
above the benchmarking averages. And, then, the same for communication.
Significantly above all three of these areas. So, the next area we will take a look
at is top priorities for the city. So, here we asked residents which of these
community priorities should receive the most emphasis from city leaders over the
next three years and I think you're picking up the three items. So, you can see
what stands out is by far the highest priority, roads, traffic and transportation, 70
percent of residents pick that as one of their top three most important. Second
highest priority is education, schools, growth and development. And, then, the
fourth, jobs and economic development. So, here what we have is the important
satisfaction rating and this is a tool that was created by ETC Institute a number of
years ago and this is really a great way to help set priorities . So, this analysis is
based on two questions on the survey. First we asked residents how satisfied
they are with different services and this is a question on major categories of city
services. And, then, the follow-up question is which of these are the most
important for the city to emphasize. So, the idea here is that those items that
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 39 of 45
have a combination of a low satisfaction rating, but also ones that people think
are important, should be the highest overall priorities. So, based on that, by far
the top priorities is planning and zoning services. Residents rate that as the most
important item and it ranked last of these 16 items of satisfaction. The second or
third highest priorities are traffic flow and police department . But there is a
significant gap between those two and planning and zoning services. Then here
we asked residents a question about transportation improvements that are the
most important and you can see by far the top priority was roadway widening.
Seventy-four percent of residents picked that as one of the top three most
important. Second most important is intersection improvements, followed by
shared bike and pedestrian facilities. And, then, just some other various survey
findings. Here we asked residents which of these bond measure options they
would be most willing to support and this question they could pick up to two that
they would support, but people also had the option of picking none if they didn't
support any of these. So, what's interesting here is only nine percent of residents
didn't pick anything. So, most people support something on this list. But you can
see it's a pretty good mix of things. The most -- highest priority was constructing
Linder Road overpass, followed by adding more bike lanes and pathways. But
those are just at 36 and 29 percent of residency who picked those. So, here we
ask the residents how they feel about prohibiting smoking in all indoor public
places in the city. So, you can see 70 percent of residents are in favor, only 24
percent opposed. The other six percent not sure. Here we asked the residents
how they feel about making it illegal to deny goods, services, housing or
employment to someone because they are either gay, bisexual, or transgender.
You can see kind of a mix of responses. Forty-eight percent oppose making it
illegal. Thirty-nine percent in favor of it. And the other 13 percent not sure. Here
we asked the residents if they would be willing to support a levy to purchase
farmland in order to preserve it for agricultural purposes . Exactly half, 50
percent, said yes. Just over a fourth, 27 percent, said no and the other 23
percent not sure. And, then, here we asked residents how they feel about giving
the residents the ability to vote on a temporary sales tax increase to prove -- that
would provide funding for identifying structural infrastructure improvements. You
can see here we also have a mixed response. Forty-two percent in favor, 37
percent opposed. A good chunk here, 21 percent that's not sure. And, then, we
had just a couple more slides about downtown. Here we asked residents how
satisfied they are with visits to downtown over the past year and you can see 68
percent are either very or somewhat satisfied and that's a nine percent increase
from three years ago when 59 percent were either very or somewhat satisfied.
And, then, 13 percent are either very or somewhat dissatisfied. And, then, we
also asked residents which night life entertainment options they prefer bringing
downtown. By far the top choice was restaurants, 55 percent picked that as one
of their top two. And, then, the other ones rated the highest were live music
venues and performance arts. So, just a quick summary. We saw that residents
have a very, very positive perception of the city. There is a lot of examples of
that. The ones that especially stand out is most residents feel like the city is an
excellent or good place to live and raise a family. Definitely the city is moving in
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 40 of 45
the right direction. The ratings have increased in most areas since the last
survey, which is impressive, because the results were really, really good last
time. Also Meridian rates higher than other communities in most of the areas
that we looked at. The one that especially stands out is the overall quality of city
services. So, again, taking everything into account at the city does. And, then,
the top overall priorities are roads, traffic, and transportation, education and
schools, and growth and development. And that’s not a surprise. Most fast
growing cities -- items related to transportation or growth are always some of the
highest priorities. So, overall, really, really great results. They were really good
last time and even a little better this time. So, really the city is doing a great job.
That's all I have. So, does anyone have any questions or comments?
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: I do have a question. Thank you for the very thorough report. We all like
living here. Probably why we are here. But so my question, though, is on your --
first slide I think was the same was your last slide.
Morano: Right.
Milam: There were -- like we had improvements in -- we had like 84 areas, but
you compared 46 of them. Are they specific areas that you generally compare,
as opposed to comparing all of the areas? Are they standard areas or did you
just compare our best areas?
Morano: So, I think you're talking about two types of data. One -- one is trends
compared to the previous survey and there are 84 items that we asked both in
2014 and this year. The 46 you're talking about are comparisons to our
benchmarking database and those are questions that we ask in other cities and
counties all across the country. So, those items that we asked often enough to
have a benchmarking database.
Milam: So, it's standard -- so the standard was that you generally compare all
the time for all cities. They weren't selected based on results?
Morano: That's right. Yeah. Yeah. We benchmark as much data as we
possibly can anytime we do the surveying, so in this case there are 46 items that
we asked here in Meridian that also are included in our benchmarking database.
Milam: Thank you.
De Weerd: Any other questions? I think this Council will look forward to getting
the full document and having a chance to kind of dive into it and see what -- what
the data numbers look like. We appreciate you being with us and, you know, this
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 41 of 45
-- this was a great report card, but now we have to gather a little bit more detail to
further understand it. But I will give the kudos to all of our staff. This was -- this
was very impressive. I think that our citizens have come to expect a level of
service. Certainly you set the standard and now there is an expectation. No
pressure. But I know that that satisfaction has shown up in a number of different
recognitions for the city and this -- this is a validator. So, thank you for your
presentation.
Morano: Great. Thank you.
Simison: And, Madam Mayor, if I could, as I hand this out -- as I mentioned the
one -- Jason put up a slide that showed you a color coded one of the entire city.
That's an appendix. I did not print out the appendix, which has 110 of those
maps in it that show the -- the breakdown by region. The reason why I did, there
really wasn't a lot of variation in those maps. Previously when we looked at it I
think that they have been touched on that in the survey, they highlight how south
Meridian was significantly different. This survey really didn't show that. So, in
the essence of saving trees, I didn't printout hard copies of it for you, but, of
course, once we get it that stuff will be made available electronically and
otherwise from that standpoint. So, I will hand this out to you and, hopefully, next
week we will come back with the resolution for approval, but if you have any
comments or edits, you can get those to me and we will get it to ETC for updates,
so we have the final version that we can post to the website and put out to
everybody else.
De Weerd: I guess, Robert, I think it would be helpful to just put it on -- I know
they are not thumb drives, flash -- some flash drives. To -- to get it to each of the
council members, so they can see the appendix. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Item 8-A is Ordinance 17 -- oh. And for the record Mr.
Cavener did join us at some point. I didn't even see him slip in. At some point
during that last item.
Coles: I did catch the time.
Item 8: Ordinances
A. Ordinance No. 17-1733: An Ordinance (Holy Apostles
Catholic Church H-2017-0019) For Annexation of a
Parcel of Land Situated in a Portion of Government Lot 1
of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise
Meridian, Ada County, Idaho as Described in Attachment
"A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated
in Ada County, Idaho and Adjacent and Contiguous to
the Corporate Limits of the city of Meridian as
Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 42 of 45
Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of Said
Lands from RUT to C-C (Community Business District)
in the Meridian City Code; Providing that Copies of this
Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor,
the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax
Commission; and Providing for a Summary of the
Ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading
rules; and Providing an Effective Date.
De Weerd: Okay. Item 8-A is Ordinance 17-1733. Mr. Clerk, will you, please,
read this by title.
Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 17-1733: An
Ordinance, Holy Apostles Catholic Church, file number H-2017-0019, for
annexation of a parcel of land situated in a portion of Government Lot 1 of
Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise meridian, Ada County,
Idaho, as described in Attachment "A" and annexing certain lands and territory,
situated in Ada county, Idaho and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits
of the City of Meridian as requested by the City of Meridian; establishing and
determining the land use zoning classification of said lands from RUT to C-C
(Community
Business District) in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this
ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder,
and the Idaho State Tax Commission; and providing for a summary of the
ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an
effective date.
De Weerd: Council, do I have a motion?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve Ordinance No. 17-1733 with suspension of rules.
Little Roberts: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-A. Mr. Clerk, will
you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent;
Little Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 43 of 45
B. Amended onto agenda: Ordinance No. 17-1732A AN
ORDINANCE (H-2016-0027 MAVERIK) FOR
ANNEXATION FOR PART OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE
1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS
DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT “A” AND ANNEXING
CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA
COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS
TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN;
ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LANDS FROM C-2
TO C-G (GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY
CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE
SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR,
THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO
STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND
PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE;
AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING
RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
De Weerd: Item 8-B was amended onto the agenda. Ordinance 17-17732A.
Mr. Clerk, will you, please, read this by title.
Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 17-1732A, an
Ordinance, file number H-2016-0027, Maverik, for annexation for part of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise
meridian, Ada county, Idaho, as described in Attachment “A” and annexing
certain lands and territory, situated in Ada county, Idaho, and adjacent and
contiguous to
corporate limits of the City of Meridian, as requested by the City of Meridian;
establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of said lands from
C-2 to C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial District) in the Meridian City
Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County
Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as
required by law; and providing for a summary of the ordinance; and providing for
a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an effective date.
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 17 -1732A with suspension of
rules.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 44 of 45
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-B. Mr. Clerk, will
you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent;
Little Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 9: Future Meeting Topics
De Weerd: Council, under Item 9, any topics for future agendas? I do have
some upcoming events. The Meridian Fire Promotion Ceremony and Employee
Awards Ceremony is tomorrow night at 6:00 p.m. at the Public Safety Training
Center. Our city picnic is on Thursday at 5:30 at Kleiner Park. Dairy Days next
week. Exciting. All kinds of things with carnival, pancake feed, pool bash, rodeo,
music and fireworks and -- and what is really exciting is the Farmers Market has
almost 30 vendors that will be there the first event. They have gotten great
response this year and just really excited to see what you can -- you can see the
best of the best for our youth here in this area. And Art in the Park will be
another pleaser for sure. So, I did pass out a calendar of events for that. We
hope to see you out and about and if you haven't let staff know that you 're
attending the parade, please, do so.
De Weerd: With that I have nothing further.
Item 10: Executive session per Idaho Code sections 74-206(1)(b) to
Consider the Evaluation, Dismissal or Disciplining of, or to
Hear Complaints or Charges Brought Against, a Public Officer,
Employee, Staff Member or Individual Agent and 74-206(1)(f),
to Communicate with Legal Counsel for the Public Agency to
Discuss the Legal Ramifications of and Legal Options for
Pending Litigation
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Oh, Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we go into Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 74-
206(1)(b), 74-206(1)(f).
Milam: Second.
Meridian City Council Workshop
June 13, 2017
Page 45 of 45
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn into Executive Session. Mr.
Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent;
Little Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: (5:11 p.m. to 9:35 p.m.)
De Weerd: I would entertain a motion to come out of Executive Session.
Bird: So moved.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: All in favor say aye?
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
De Weerd: I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
Bird: So moved.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: All in favor. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:35 P.M.
(AUDIO
MAYOR TAMMY DE
ATTEST:
I
N FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
, CITY CLERK
/ 5 / >-;C7
DATE APPROVED
Q09- AUGVST
O j0
5'%�'VEIKIDIAN�-
�ity Uf
IDAHO
s� SEAL �/
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4A
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0019
ITEM TITLE: Holy Apostles Church
Development Agreement for Holy Apostles Church (H-2017-0019) located at the
southeast corner of N. Meridian Road and E. Chinden Blvd. at 6300 N Meridian Road, in
the NW 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East (Parcel No.:S0530223200)
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-055359
BOISE IDAHO Pgs=28 HEATHER LUTHER 06/16/2017 04:57 PM
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
PARTIES: 1, City of Meridian
2, Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise, Owner/Developer
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into
this day of :�� , 2017, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal
corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue,
Meridian, Idaho 83642 and Catholic Diocese of Boise, whose address is 1501 S. Federal Way, Suite
400, Boise, ID 83705, hereinafter called OWNER/ DEVELOPER,
1, RECITALS:
1,1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract
of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A", which
is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in
full, herein after referred to as the Property; and
L2 WHERE, AS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides that cities may, by ordinance,
require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner/Developer make a
written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject
Property; and
1,3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of
Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which
authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re -zoning of
land; and
1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer has submitted an application for the
annexation of approximately 16,32 acres of land from the RUT zoning
district in Ada County to the C -C (Community Business) zoning district (as
described in Exhibit "A"), under the Unified Development Code, which
generally describes how the Property will be developed and what
improvements will be made; and
1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings
both before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission and before the
Meridian City Council, as to how the Property will be developed and what
improvements will be made; and
1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for the requested preliminary plat
on the Property held before the Planning & Zoning Commission, and
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—HOLY APOSTLES (H-2017-0019) PAGE 1 OF 8
subsequently before the City Council, includes responses of government
subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning
jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and
1.7 WHEREAS, on the 16`" day of May, 2017, the Meridian City Council
approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and
Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and
attached as Exhibit `B"; and
1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a
Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final
plat; and
1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deems it to be in its best interest to be able to
enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered
into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and
1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development
agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the
subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions
of this Agreement, herein being established as a result of evidence received
by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government
subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from
affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation are in accordance
with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on October
11, 2016, Resolution No. 16-1173, and the UDC, Title 11.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth
herein, the parties agree as follows:
2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and
binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and
phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,
unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise:
3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement,
which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of
Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose
address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642.
3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Roman Catholic Diocese of
Boise, whose address is 1501 S. Federal Way, Suite 400, Boise, Idaho 83705,
the party that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any
subsequent owner(s)/developers of the Property.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -HOLY APOSTLES (H-2017-0019) PAGE 2 OF 8
3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located
in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit "A"
describing the parcels to be re -zoned Community Business District (C -C) and
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at
length.
4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the
right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed
under the UDC.
4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without
modification of this Agreement.
5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following
special conditions:
a. The Applicant shall provide for future right-of-way as required by the Idaho
Transportation Department for the widening of E. Chinden Blvd. (SH 20/26).
b. Access is limited to the access points that currently exist to this site [one (1) via N.
Meridian Road and one (1) via E. Chinden Blvd.]; no additional accesses shall be
allowed in accord with UDC 11-3A-3.
c. The developer shall pipe or otherwise cover any and all open ditches that cross this site in
accord with UDC 11-3A-6 unless such waterway is improved as a water amenity as
defined in UDC 11-1A-1.
d. A minimum 35 -foot wide street buffer shall be provided along the north and west
property boundaries adjacent to E. Chinden Blvd. and N. Meridian Road, both entryway
corridors, and landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11 -3B -7C.
e. This development is required to connect to the City sewer system within sixty (60) days
of annexation into the City in accord with UDC I 1-3A-21 and MCC 9-1-4. At such time
as the development is connected to City sewer service, disconnection from private
service is required. Note: The church is not required to hook-up to City water service
based on the terms of the 2007 Agreement between the City of Meridian and United
Water of Idaho (preceding water purveyor to Suez North America) which stipulates that
Suez will retain their current customers.
f. All development shall comply with the dimensional standards for the C -C zoning district
listed in UDC Table 11-213-3 and the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-6,
Church or Place of Religious Worship.
g. A minimum 10 -foot wide multi -use pathway is required to be constructed within the
street buffer along E. Chinden Blvd. within a public use easement as set forth in UDC
11 -3H -4C.4. The pathway shall be setback outside of the area needed for future right -of -
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -HOLY APOSTLES (H-2017-0019 PAGE 3 OF 8
way expansion of Chinden Blvd./SH 20/26. Coordinate the details of the easement with
Jay Gibbons, Park's Department (208-888-3579), and submit a copy of the easement to
the Planning Division for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation.
h. A cross-access/ingress-egress easement shall be recorded to the property to the east
(Zamzow's) in accord with UDC 11 -3A -3A.
i. To ensure compliance with UDC standards for site improvements required in this
agreement as a provision of annexation, a Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required
to be submitted to the Planning Division within 60 days of annexation. The required
improvements will need to be completed within one (1) year of approval of the
Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6)
months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void.
7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE -ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF
ZONING DESIGNATION:
7.1 Acts of Default. Either party's failure to faithfully comply with all of the
terms and conditions included in this Agreement shall constitute default
under this Agreement.
7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this
Agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of
written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the
breach and cure the default, which action must be prosecuted with diligence
and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that
in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within
such one hundred eighty (180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such
failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the
curing of the same with diligence and continuity.
7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after
notice as described in Section 7.2, Owner/Developer shall be deemed to have
consented to modification of this Agreement and de -annexation and reversal
of the zoning designations described herein, solely against the offending
portion of Property and upon City's compliance with all applicable laws,
ordinances and rules, including any applicable provisions of Idaho Code §§
67-6509 and 67-6511. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest
whether a default has occurred. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the
Fourth Judicial District Court in Ada County by either City or
Owner/Developer, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns
of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at
law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants,
agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -HOLY APOSTLES (H-2017-0019) PAGE 4 OF 8
7.4 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed
hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are
beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance,
which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or
similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the
amount of time of such delay.
7.5 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or
more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default
and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City
nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and
conditions.
8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any
portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City
ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written
approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property.
9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement,
including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the
third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re -zoning of the Property by
the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the
ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the
City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement.
10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a
valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein.
11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds,
irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the
UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to
provide, if required by the City.
12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued
in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the
City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance
with Paragraph 11 above.
13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by
all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement.
14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement
shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the
United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed
as follows:
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -HOLY APOSTLES (H-2017-0019 PAGE 5 OF 8
CITY:
City Clerk
City of Meridian
33 E. Broadway Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise
1501 S. Federal Way, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83705
with copy to:
City Attorney
City of Meridian
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, ID 83642
14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other
party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section.
15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto
concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as
may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent
jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall
survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement.
16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time
is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that
the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a
default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform.
17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives,
including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be
binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest
in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or
portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any
successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions
herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner/Developer, to execute appropriate and
recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion,
had determined that Owner/Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement.
18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a
court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement
and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein.
19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party
shall act reasonably in giving any consent, approval, or taking any other action under this Agreement.
20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action
or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official)
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -HOLY APOSTLES (H-2017-0019) PAGE 6 OF 8
challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in
defending such action or proceeding.
21, FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements,
agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject
matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or
written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein.
Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to
this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them
or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted
ordinance or resolution of City.
21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re -zoning of the subject
Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the
City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the
notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the
time of the proposed amendment.
22, EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the
date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in
connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City
Cleric.
[end of text; signatures, acknowledgements, and Exhibits A and B follow]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made
it effective as hereinabove provided,
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise
By Lr. bI
A
C.3–ay Cues, City C
o�PZED AUGUST
Q
City of
&Qf IDIAN
IDAHO
SEAL )
CITY OF MERIDIAN
By. —
May r Takitty de Weerd
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT —HOLY APOSTLES (H-2017-0019) PAGE 7 ON 8
STATE OF IDAHO )
ss:
County of Ada, )
V-1
On this day of , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and
for said State, personally appeared .", , known or identified to me to be
they e c�a.. 92 eC� • of Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise and acknowledged to me that
he executed the same on behalf of said organization.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year in this certificate first above written.
(SEAL) '•••ee�a�u�a••��.
tA0TgRr'4,` t
Z
s • &SLIC .•
OF IDO
STATE OF IDAHO )
: ss
County of Ada )
Notary Public for Idaho
Residing at: TtA�
My Commission Expires: It
On this It96�1 day of �( anP , 2017, before me, a Notary Public,
personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles, know or identified to me to be the Mayor
and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that
executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the
same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year in this certificate first above written.
(SEA,�?�C'O T<9,i,':•t
• �' 17
•9IC o .
•xv
%0* OF"IDN.-4
'••e...•••'
C km A UY-U wm�
Notary Public for Idaho
Residing at:
Commission expires: 3- 92.20I2
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HOLY APOSTLES (H-2017-0019 PAGE 8 OF 8
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 12
C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map for Annexation Boundary
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 13
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0019 - 1 -
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of the Request for Annexation & Zoning of 16.32 Acres of Land with a C-C Zoning
District for Holy Apostles Church, by Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise.
Case No(s). H-2017-0019
For the City Council Hearing Date of: May 2, 2017 (Findings on May 16, 2017)
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 2, 2017, incorporated by
reference)
2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 2, 2017, incorporated by
reference)
3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 2, 2017,
incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing
date of May 2, 2017, incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at
Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by
ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A.
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose
expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be
signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the
Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party
requesting notice.
7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of May 2, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0019 - 2 -
reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the
application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon
the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that:
1. The applicant’s request for annexation & zoning is hereby approved with the requirement of a
development agreement with the provisions noted in the Staff Report for the hearing date of
May 2, 2017, attached as Exhibit A.
D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits
Notice of Development Agreement Duration
The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a
development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development
agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or
rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request.
A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development
agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in
accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the
property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the
modification.
A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the
agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement
to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval
period.
E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development
application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in
writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the
final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will
toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian.
When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person
who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the
governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order
seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 2, 2017
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the (U day of ,
2017.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD
COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON
COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS
COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER
COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER
COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
TIE BREAKER)
eerd
Q AUGUST
0P
Attest:
z 1 1
u
Py
ay Col
I v Clerk
VOTED I(G
VOTED
VOTED 7(4
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED
Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City
Attorney.
By: Gj Y C -e) Dated: / l 7 )217
City Cleric's Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0019 - 3 -
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: May 2, 2017
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner
208-884-5533
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
208-887-2211
SUBJECT: Holy Apostles – AZ (H-2017-0019)
I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant, Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise, has submitted an application for annexation and
zoning (AZ) of 16.32 acres of land with a C-C zoning district.
II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed AZ application with the requirement of a development
agreement in accord with the provisions in Exhibit B and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law in Exhibit D.
The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on April 6, 2017. At the public
hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ request.
a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Tamara Thompson, The Land Group
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written testimony: Tamara Thompson, The Land Group (response to the staff report)
v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen
vi. Other staff commenting on application: None
b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony:
i. None
c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission:
i. None
d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
i. None
e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. None
The Meridian City Council heard this item on May 2, 2017. At the public hearing, the Council
approved the subject AZ request.
a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Michael Thomas, The Land Group
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written testimony: Tamara Thompson, The Land Group (in agreement with staff
report)
v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen
vi. Other staff commenting on application: None
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 2
b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony:
i. None
c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council:
i. None
di. Key Council Changes to Staff/Commission Recommendation
i. None
III. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-
0019, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 2, 2017, with the following
modifications: (Add any proposed modifications).
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0019,
as presented during the hearing on May 2, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific
reasons for denial)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0019 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date
here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
A. Site Address/Location:
The site is located at the southeast corner of N. Meridian Road and E. Chinden Blvd. at 6300 N.
Meridian Road, in the NW ¼ of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East. (Parcel No.:
S0530223200)
B. Owners:
Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise
1501 S. Federal Way, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83705
C. Applicant:
Same as owner
D. Representative:
Tamara Thompson, The Land Group
462 E. Shore Drive, Suite 100
Eagle, ID 83712
E. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information.
V. PROCESS FACTS
A. The subject application is for annexation and zoning. A public hearing is required before the
Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on this matter, consistent with Meridian City
Code Title 11, Chapter 5.
B. Newspaper notifications published on: March 17, 2017 (Commission); April 14, 2017 (City
Council)
C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: March 9, 2017 (Commission); April 7,
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 3
2017 (City Council)
D. Applicant posted notice on site(s) on: March 23, 2017 (Commission); April 21, 2017 (City
Council)
VI. LAND USE
A. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning: This site is developed with a church, a single-family home, a
mobile office used for a charity food pantry, and associated parking and landscaping, zoned RUT
in Ada County.
B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
1. North: E. Chinden Blvd. and rural residential properties in Castlebury West Subdivision,
zoned R1 in Ada County
2. East: Zamzow’s retail store, zoned RUT in Ada County
3. South: St. Ignatius School, zoned C-C
4. West: N. Meridian Road and vacant/undeveloped land (approved for residential homes -
Paramount Director), zoned R-15
C. History of Previous Actions: A property boundary adjustment was recorded in 2016 that created
the current configuration of the property (ROS #10478).
D. Utilities:
1. Location of sewer: A sanitary sewer main intended to provide service to the subject site
currently exists near the SE corner of the subject site.
2. Location of water: The Holy Apostles Catholic Church is currently receiving water service
from the Suez North America water system in Chinden Boulevard. Terms of a 2007
Agreement between the City of Meridian and United Water of Idaho (preceding water
purveyor) stipulates that Suez will retain their current customers in the area that includes the
Church. Therefore, the City of Meridian will not be providing water service to the subject
church site.
3. Issues or concerns: None
E. Physical Features:
1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The North Slough runs across the southwest boundary of this site
and has been piped.
2. Hazards: Staff is unaware of any hazards that may exist on this property.
3. Flood Plain: This property does not lie within the flood plain.
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 4
VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
Land Use: The subject property is designated Mixed Use - Community (MU-C) on the Future Land
Use Map (FLUM) contained in the Comprehensive Plan.
The purpose of this designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are
seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses, including
residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings. Goods and services in
these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to, but also walk or bike to
up to 3 or 4 miles. Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are
encouraged. Developments are encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-C plan
depicted in Figure 3-3 in the Comprehensive Plan (pg. 27).
Developments should have a mix of at least 3 land use types; residential uses should comprise a
minimum of 20% of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre; non-residential
buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings; vertically
integrated structures are encouraged; supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces
and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries,
and schools that comprise a minimum of 5% of the development area are required.
The existing church is a desired use in the MU-C designated area as it provides a service to the
community and is easily accessible by car and within walking and biking distance from nearby
residential developments. Adjacent properties within the MU-C designated area have developed with
a retail store (Zamzow’s, to the east); an assisted living facility (Veranda Senior Living, to the west at
Chinden/Fox Run); and future single-family attached homes (Paramount Director, to the west
between Fox Run and Meridian Road). There is also land that has not yet developed within the MU-C
designated area which will further contribute to the mix of uses in this area when developed.
Policies: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application
and apply to the proposed use of this property (staff analysis in italics):
Require appropriate landscape and street buffers along transportation corridors (setback,
vegetation, low walls, berms, etc.).” (3.06.02F)
A 35-foot wide street buffer with landscaping is required along N. Meridian Road and E.
Chinden Blvd., entryway corridors, in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.
Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent
parcels.” (3.06.01F)
There are no residential properties that abut this site.
Restrict curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets.” (3.06.02D)
This site currently has a full access via N. Meridian Road and E. Chinden Blvd, both arterial
streets. The UDC (11-3A-3) restricts access to arterial streets when access is available via a
local street. Local street access is not available to this site. Therefore, staff does not
recommend any restrictions on access for this site with this application.
Ensure development provides safe routes and access to schools, parks and other community
gathering places.” (3.07.02N)
A detached sidewalk exists along N. Meridian Road and a 10-foot wide detached multi-use
pathway is required to be constructed along the frontage of the site on E. Chinden Blvd.
which will provide a safe route to community gathering places.
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 5
Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time
of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F)
City sewer service is available and will be extended by the applicant upon annexation of the
property in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and as set forth in the development agreement.
Encourage and promote the preservation and expansion of Chinden Boulevard (US 20/26) by
ITD (3.03.02L, Chapter 3, page 48).
The applicant should coordinate with ITD on the preservation of right of way (ROW) along
the Chinden corridor. The total ROW needed for this segment of corridor is 140 feet. The
submitted plan does not depict any future ROW for the expansion of the roadway. Staff
recommends the applicant depict the 30-feet of additional (70-feet total from centerline)
ROW with the submittal of a certificate of zoning compliance application.
Analysis: Annexation of this property with an existing church and C-C zoning is consistent with the
FLUM designation of MU-C and should be compatible with adjacent commercial and residential
uses. Therefore, Staff feels the proposed development is appropriate within the MU-C designation.
VIII. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC)
A. Purpose Statement of Zone: The purpose of the Commercial Districts is to provide for the retail
and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Six
districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures accommodated
in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of the district in
proximity to streets and highways.
The C-C district allows a larger scale (than C-N) and broader mix of retail, office and service uses
with access to arterial or collector streets.
B. Schedule of Use: Unified Development Code (UDC) Table 11-2B-2 lists the principal permitted
P), accessory (A), conditional (C), and prohibited (-) uses in the C-C zoning district. Any use not
explicitly listed, or listed as a prohibited use is prohibited. The use of the site as a church is a
principal permitted use in the C-C district, subject to the specific use standards set forth in UDC
11-4-3-6.
C. Dimensional Standards: Development of the site should be consistent with the dimensional
standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-C zoning district.
D. Landscaping: Street buffer landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the standards listed
in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-C zoning district.
E. Off-Street Parking: Off-street parking is required in accord with UDC 11-3C-6B for non-
residential uses.
F. Structure and Site Design Standards: Development of this site must comply with the design
standards in accord with UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines listed in the Architectural Standards
Manual.
IX. ANALYSIS
A. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation:
The applicant has applied for annexation and zoning of 16.32 acres of land with a C-C zoning
district. As discussed above in Section VII, the proposed zoning is consistent with the
corresponding FLUM designation of MU-C and the policies in the Comprehensive Plan as noted.
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 6
The legal description submitted with the application, included in Exhibit C, shows the boundaries
of the property proposed to be annexed and zoned. The property is contiguous to land that has
been annexed into the City and is within the Area of City Impact boundary.
The City may require a development agreement (DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant
to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure compliance with the provisions of annexation
included in this report in Exhibit B, staff recommends a DA.
The applicant has submitted a site plan, included in Exhibit B, showing how the site is developed
with a church, accessory structures, parking and access. The plan also includes the 10-foot wide
multi-use pathway proposed to be constructed along Chinden Blvd.
Existing Structures: There is an existing 52,220 square foot church and accessory structures (a
single-family home and food pantry) on this site.
Dimensional Standards: Future development on the site is required to comply with the
dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-C district.
Specific Use Standards: The proposed use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC
11-4-3-6, Church or Place of Religious Worship, as follows: “Schools, child daycare services,
meeting facilities for clubs and organizations, and other similar uses not operated primarily for
the purpose of religious instruction, worship, government of the church, or the fellowship of its
congregation may be permitted to the extent the activity is otherwise permitted in the district.”
Access: Access to arterial streets is limited in accord with the provisions listed in UDC 11 -3A-3.
One full access currently exists via N. Meridian Road and one full access exists via E. Chinden
Blvd. (SH 20/26). Because access via a local street doesn’t exist to this property, these accesses
are allowed to remain; however, no additional accesses are allowed in the future.
A cross-access/ingress-egress/cross-parking agreement was required to be recorded between the
subject property and the school property to the south with the annexation of the school site.
Further, the church’s Chinden access is shared with the Zamzow’s property to the east.
If/When the Zamzow’s property request annexation into the City, the Zamzow’s property
may be required to close their most easterly Chinden access. For this reason, staff
recommends, the applicant record a cross-access/ingress-egress easement with the property
to the east (Zamzow’s).
Parking: A minimum of one parking space is required per every 500 square feet of gross floor
area. Based on 52,220 square feet, a minimum of 104 spaces are required. A total of 375 parking
spaces are proposed on the concept plan on the subject property with shared parking on the school
property to the south consisting of 60 spaces.
Waterways: The North Slough runs along the southwest corner and the west boundary of this
site. The UDC (11-3A-6) requires all irrigation ditches, laterals, canals and drains to be piped
unless left open as a water amenity (as defined in UDC 11-1A-1) or linear open space.
Utilities: The UDC (11-3A-21) requires all development to connect to the City water and sewer
system unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Based on the terms of a 2007 Agreement
between the City of Meridian and United Water of Idaho (preceding water purveyor to Suez
North America) stipulating that Suez will retain their current customers, the City will not be
providing water service to the subject church site.
Adequate fire protection shall be required in accord with the appropriate fire district standards.
Street lighting is required to be installed with development of this property in accord with the
City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. A Type 1 light is required at the
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 7
intersection of Meridian Road and the school entrance and 220 feet to the south of the first light
as shown on the site plan.
Pressurized Irrigation (PI): The UDC (11-3A-15) requires an underground PI system to be
provided for this development in accord with UDC 11-3A-15. However, because this property is
not required to hook up to City water service, a PI system is not required.
Landscaping: A minimum 35-foot wide street buffer is required along N. Meridian Road and E.
Chinden Blvd. (SH 20/26), both entryway corridors, landscaped in accord with the standards
listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Approximately 275 feet of the 35-foot landscape buffer is not
constructed along the Chinden frontage. Staff recommends that this portion of the landscape
buffer be constructed within one year of the certificate of zoning compliance approval.
Sidewalks/Pathways: Sidewalks are required along all public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-
17. A detached sidewalk already exists along N. Meridian Road; no sidewalk exists along
Chinden. The UDC (11-3H-4C) requires a 10-foot wide detached multi-use pathway to be
provided along E. Chinden Blvd. (SH 20/26) within a public pedestrian easement.
Further, staff recommends the applicant reserve all necessary right-of-way for the future
widening of Chinden Boulevard. With the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance
application, the applicant should depict the future ITD right-of-way on the site plan to
ensure the required 10-foot multi-use pathway and the required 35-foot wide landscape
buffer comply with the standards set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3 and UDC 11-3B-7C.
Building Elevations: No new structures are proposed with this application.
Certificate of Zoning Compliance: To ensure compliance with UDC standards for site
improvements required as a provision of annexation, a Certificate of Zoning Compliance is
required to be submitted to the Planning Division within 60 days of annexation. The
required improvements will need to be completed within one (1) year of approval of the
Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
In summary, Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation and zoning request for this
site with a development agreement containing the provisions listed in Exhibit B of this report in
accord with the findings contained in Exhibit D.
X. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings/Other
1. Vicinity/Zoning Map
2. Site Plan (dated: 2/10/17)
B. Agency & Department Comments
C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map for Annexation Boundary
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 7
A. Drawings
1. Vicinity/Zoning Map
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 8
2. Site Plan (dated: 2/10/17)
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 9
B. EXHIBIT B - AGENCY & DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1.1.1 A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior
to the annexation ordinance approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,
the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer.
Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the applicant to the Planning Division prior to
commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the
City within six (6) months of the City Council granting annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,
incorporate the following provisions:
a. The Applicant shall provide for future right-of-way as required by the Idaho Transportation
Department for the widening of E. Chinden Blvd. (SH 20/26).
b. Access is limited to the access points that currently exist to this site [one (1) via N. Meridian
Road and one (1) via E. Chinden Blvd.]; no additional accesses shall be allowed in accord
with UDC 11-3A-3.
c. The developer shall pipe or otherwise cover any and all open ditches that cross this site in
accord with UDC 11-3A-6 unless such waterway is improved as a water amenity as defined
in UDC 11-1A-1.
d. A minimum 35-foot wide street buffer shall be provided along the north and west property
boundaries adjacent to E. Chinden Blvd. and N. Meridian Road, both entryway corridors, and
landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.
e. This development is required to connect to the City sewer system within sixty (60) days of
annexation into the City in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and MCC 9-1-4. At such time as the
development is connected to City sewer service, disconnection from private service is
required. Note: The church is not required to hook-up to City water service based on the
terms of the 2007 Agreement between the City of Meridian and United Water of Idaho
preceding water purveyor to Suez North America) which stipulates that Suez will retain their
current customers.
f. All development shall comply with the dimensional standards for the C-C zoning district
listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 and the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-6, Church
or Place of Religious Worship.
g. A minimum 10-foot wide multi-use pathway is required to be constructed within the street
buffer along E. Chinden Blvd. within a public use easement as set forth in UDC 11-3H-4C.4.
The pathway shall be setback outside of the area needed for future right-of-way expansion of
Chinden Blvd./SH 20/26. Coordinate the details of the easement with Jay Gibbons, Park’s
Department (208-888-3579), and submit a copy of the easement to the Planning Division for
approval by City Council and subsequent recordation.
h. A cross-access/ingress-egress easement shall be recorded to the property to the east
Zamzow’s) in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.
i. To ensure compliance with UDC standards for site improvements required in this agreement
as a provision of annexation, a Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required to be submitted
to the Planning Division within 60 days of annexation. The required improvements will need
to be completed within one (1) year of approval of the Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 10
2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval
2.1.1 The Holy Apostles Catholic Church is currently receiving water service from the Suez North
America water system in Chinden Boulevard. Terms of a 2007 Agreement between the City of
Meridian and United Water of Idaho (preceding water purveyor) stipulates that Suez will retain
their current customers in the area that includes the Church. Therefore, the City of Meridian will
not be proving water service to the subject church site.
2.1 General Conditions of Approval
2.2.1 Applicant shall coordinate sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and
execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of
a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to
sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of
Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications.
2.2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer mains to and
through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for
infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5.
2.2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public sewer mains outside of public right of way.
The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility. The easements shall be dedicated
via the City of Meridian’s standard forms. Submit an executed easement (on the form available
from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land
Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11”
map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed,
signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat
referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to
development plan approval.
2.2.4 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and
inspections (208)375-5211.
2.2.5 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan
approval letter.
2.2.6 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
2.2.7 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
2.2.8 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B.
2.2.9 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per
the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved
prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project.
2.2.10 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of
20% of the total construction cost for all completed public sewer, water and reuse infrastructure
for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the
owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash
deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 11
Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for
more information at 887-221.
3. POLICE DEPARTMENT
3.1 The Police Department has no comments on this application.
4. FIRE DEPARTMENT
2.1 The Fire Department had no comments on this application.
5. REPUBLIC SERVICES
5.1 Republic Services did not submit comments on this application.
6. PARKS DEPARTMENT
6.1 The Park’s Department has no comments on this application.
7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
Comments have not been received from ACHD on this application.
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 12
C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map for Annexation Boundary
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 13
EXHIBIT A
Holy Apostles – AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 14
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
1. Annexation Findings:
Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation
and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation, the
Council shall make the following findings:
a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive
Plan;
The Applicant is proposing to annex the subject 16.32 acres of land property with a C-C
zoning district consistent with the MU-C FLUM designation for this property. The City
Council finds that the proposed map amendment and existing church use complies with the
provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and should be compatible with the adjacent residential
and commercial uses (see section VII above for more information).
b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district,
specifically the purpose statement;
The City Council finds that the proposed map amendment to the C-C zoning district is
consistent with the purpose statement for the commercial districts as detailed in Section VIII
above.
c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,
and welfare;
The City Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare. City utilities will be extended at the expense of the
applicant.
d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services
by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not
limited to, school districts; and,
The City Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse
impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this
site.
e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E).
The City Council finds annexing this property with a C-C zoning district is in the best interest
of the City.
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4B
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2016-0061
ITEM TITLE: Harmony Hills Assisted Living
Development Agreement for Harmony Hills Assisted Living (H-2016-0061) located on the
north side of W. Overland Road, west of S. Stoddard Road in the southwest'/4 of Section
13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-054341
BOISE IDAHO Pgs=17 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 06/15/2017 10:16 AM
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE
ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
PARTIES: 1: City of Meridian
3. Derk Pardoe, Owner/Developer
TATS ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is dated
This l day of ) ( A%g , 2( 6, ("ADDENDUM"), by and between City of
Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho ("CITY"), whose address is 33 E.
Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 andDerkPardoe, ("OWNER/DEVELOPEW),
whose address is 3454 Stone Mountain Lane, Sandy, UT 84072,
RECITALS
A. CITY and OWNER/DEVELOPER entered into that certain
Development Agreement that was recorded on May 8, 2014 in the real property records of
Ada County as II1stlumentNo. 114034780 ("DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT")
B. CITY and OWNER/DEVELOPER. now desire to amend the
Development Agreement, which terns have -been approved by -the Meridian City Council in
accordance with Idaho Code Section 67-6511..
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set
forth herein, the paities agree as follows:
1. OWN ER/DEVELOPER shall be bound by the terms ofthe Development Agreement,
except as specifleally amended as follows;
5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DETIELOP MENT OF SUBJECT
PIZOPERT I':
5.1 0—Pner/Developer ,shall develop the Property in accordance with the
following special conditions.
5.13 Development of the property shall substantially comply with the
eonceptplan and wilding Blew(tions attached in .exhibit A. 3 andA.4
of the Stcff Report attached to the Findings (Exhibit A), the design
standards listed in VDC .l.l -3,449 and the guidelines contained in the
Architectural Standards Manual,
ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - Hamony Hills Assisted Living, MDA H 2016,0061 Page 1 oN
_z. 1.2 Other than the one (1) previously approved access to Overland Road
(PP -07-013), direct lot access is prohibited unless waived by City
Council in accord with UDC 11-3A-3.
3.1.3 The applicant shall grant cross access to the property to the west
(Parcel #S1213336006) through the retail portion ofthe development
as depicted on the Kennedy Commercial Center Subdivision Final
Plat (FP -07-036).
5.1.4 Any fixture multi family use on the site must obtain approval of a
conditional use permit and comply with the specific use standards set
forth in UDC 11-4-3-27.
5.1.5 Sanitary sewer service to the Kennedy Commercial development is
currently being accomplished via a temporary lift station which
pumps to a discharge manhole in Overland Road. It shall be the
responsibility of this developer to commission a study of the lift
station capacity, and make any upgrades that are needed to
accommodate this new proposal.
5.1.6 A 25' l vide landscape buffer between uses shall be constructed along
the Western boundary of this property adiacent to the residential
portion of the development. The buffer shall be constructed in accord
with UDC 11-3B-9 and is intended to eliminate the need for the
existing industrial zoned property to the west (Parcel ff
51213336006) to construct a land use buffer.
5.1.7 Any nursing care facility use on the site must obtain approval of a
conditional use permit and comply with the sped frc use standards set
forth in UDC 11-4-3-29.
2. That Owlier/Developer agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian and the
Property shall be subject to de -annexation if the Owner/Developer, or their assigns, heirs, or
successor steal l not meet the conditions of this Addendum, and the Ordinances of the City of
Meridian as herein provided.
3. This Addendum shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the parties'
respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate
authorities and their successors in office. This Addendum shall be binding on the
Owner/Developer of the Property, each subsequent owner and any other person(s) acquiring
an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the
Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the
provisions hereon and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by
the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of
Owner/Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this
Addendum if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that
Owner/Developer have fully performed its obligations under this Addendum.
d. If any provision of this Addendum is held not valid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Addendum and the
invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein.
ADDENDUM 'I O DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -Harmony Hills Assisted Living, MDA H 2016-0061 Paga 2 of 4
5. This Addendum sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition, and
understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter herein, and
there are no promises,- agreements, conditions or under -standing, either oral or writtei-4
express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein.
Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or
addition to this Addendum shall be bindinguponthe parties hereto unless reducedto writing
and signed by thein or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect
to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City.
a. Except as herein provided, no condition governing the uses and/or
conditions governing development of the subject Property herein
provided for can be modified or amended within the approval of the City
Council after the City has conducted public hearing{s} in accordance with
the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or
amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment.
6, This Addendum shall be effective as of the date herein above written,
7. Except as amended by the Addendum, all terms of the'previous Agreements shall
remain in full force and effect.
ACKCNO'WLEDGMENTS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the panties have herein executed this agreement
and made it effective as hercinabove provided.
OWNER/DE-VE LOPER:
Derk Pardoe
By:
CITY OF MERIDIAN Ep AUGVSl ATTEST:
o
ow
City o
Ey' -- -1AN&—
Mayor T de Weer IDAHO C, y Co es, City Cleric
SEAL �W
ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -Harmony Hills Assisted living, MDA 1-12016-0061 Page 3 of it
STATE OF )
County oa.
On this -(� -( day o a4U 6, before me, the widersigned, a Notary Public in and for said
State, personally appeared
Der Pardo , own or identified to me, and acknowledged tome that he executed
the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year in this certificate first above written.
(SEAL)
STATE OF I DA I-1 O
hO'fNtYPt1�11C
�tllAlr!!VE 80'YER
rdl►tM6
COMAiWON EXPIRES
timwuk ot, gor/
STATE Of UTAH
ss
L` azx c.J
No ary u lic for
Residit at:
My Cacnmission Expires:
County of Ada )
On th is � J day of �J u , before me, a Notary .Public, personally appeared
Tanuny de 'Weerd and C.Jay Coles, [snow or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the
City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrumentonbehalf ofsaid City,
and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same.
IN WI -IN ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
in this certificate first above written.
••'LENS'••
(SEAL) ••
-"pTA�
L� sj,�:ALIBLZC'- �o
•qT ()F-1��' •••
,lo AL rtf b Lam=
Notary Public for Idaho
Residing at:
Connnission expires:
ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - Harmony Hills Assisted Living, MDA H 2016-0061 Page 4 of 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). H-2016-0061 - 1 -
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of the Request for an Amendment to the Development Agreement for Harmony Hills
Assisted Living for the purposes of incorporating a new concept plan, building elevations and
modifying certain provisions of the development agreement, by Derk Pardoe.
Case No(s). H-2016-0061
For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 19, 2016 (Findings on July 26, 2016)
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 19, 2016, incorporated by
reference)
2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 19, 2016, incorporated by
reference)
3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 19, 2016,
incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing
date of July 19, 2016, incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at
Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by
ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A.
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose
expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be
signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the
Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party
requesting notice.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). H-2016-0061 - 2 -
7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of July 19, 2016, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be
reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the
application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon
the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that:
1. The applicant’s request for an amendment to the development agreement is hereby approved
per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 19, 2016, attached as Exhibit
A.
D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits
Notice of Development Agreement Duration
The development agreement shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the City
within six (6) months of the City Council granting annexation and/or rezone (UDC 11-5B-3D).
A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development
agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in
accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the
property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the
modification (UDC 11-5B-3F).
A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the
agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement
to be signed and returned to the City if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval
period (UDC 11-5B-3F).
E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development
application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in
writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the
final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will
toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian.
When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person
who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the
governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order
seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 19, 2016
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of ' ,
2016. r
COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD
COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON
COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS
COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER
COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER
COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
TIE BREAKER)
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED --
i
VOTED
i
Tammy de Weerd
Attest: AP -
PI, AUGvsT,
i0
C _ w
1 i n .q City of
City Clerk
DA
SEAL
Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City
Attorney.
By: i L 4 Lk Dated:
ity Clerk's Office
X7, 1 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). H-2016-0061 - 3 -
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 1
STAFF REPORT
HEARING DATE: July 19, 2016
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Josh Beach, Associate City Planner
208-884-5533
SUBJECT: Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061
I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant, Derk Pardoe, requests a modification to the existing development agreement (MDA) for the
purposes of incorporating a new concept plan, building elevations and modifying certain provisions of the
development agreement. See Section IX Analysis for more information.
II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA as requested by the applicant.
The Meridian City Council heard these items on September 18, 2012. At the public hearing, the
Council approved the subject CPAM, AZ, and PP requests.
a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Brent Barfus
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written testimony: None
v. Staff presenting application: Josh Beach
vi. Other staff commenting on application: None
b. Key Issues of Discussion by Council:
i. None
c. Key Council Changes to Staff/Commission Recommendation
i. None
III. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2016-0061 as
presented in the staff report for the hearing date of July 19, 2016, with the following modifications: (Add
any proposed modifications.)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny H-2016-0061 as presented during
the hearing on July 19, 2016, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2016-0061 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for
the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
A. Site Address/Location: The site is located on the north side of W. Overland Road, west of S. Stoddard
Road in the southwest ¼ of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West. (Parcel #’s R4885160020,
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 2
R4885160030, R4885160040, R4885160050, R4885160062, R4885160070, R4885160080 and
R4885160090)
B. Owner/Applicant:
Derk Pardoe
3454 Stone Mountain Lane
Sandy, UT 84072
C. Representative:
Brian Carlisle, The Richardson Design Partnership, LLC
510 South 600 East
Salt Lake City, UT 84102
D. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information.
V. PROCESS FACTS
A. The subject application is for a development agreement modification. A public hearing is required
before the City Council on this matter, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5.
B. Newspaper notifications published on: June 6, and June 20, 2016
C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: June 2, 2016
D. Applicant posted notice on site by: July 5, 2016
VI. LAND USE
A. Existing Land Use(s): A portion of the site is currently being developed with 190 unit apartment
complex. A portion of the site remains vacant along the Interstate and the W. Overland Road.
B. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
1. North: I-84
2. East: Western Electronics Building and University of Phoenix, zoned I-L and C-G
3. South: Overland Road and Sagewood Subdivision (currently under construction), zoned L-O and R-
8
4. West: Vacant industrial property, zoned I-L (Future site of recently approved Bish’s RV Sales)
C. History of Previous Actions:
In 2001, the property received a conditional use permit/planned unit development approval (CUP-
01-009), under the name of Treasure Valley Technical Center, which allowed for daycare, office,
retail and industrial uses. As part of that approval a conceptual site plan was approved and any
future daycare, office and retail uses require conditional use permit approval.
In 2007, a preliminary plat and final plat (PP-07-013 and FP-07-036) was approved for the 26 +/-
acre portion of the site to the north and west of Western Electronics that consisted of 11 building
lots and 2 common lots.
In 2008, the property received comprehensive map amendment and rezone (CPA-08-005 and RZ-
08-003) approval to change the land use from industrial to commercial and rezone the property
from the I-L zone to the C-G zone. With the rezone of the property, the City required a
development agreement (DA) that recorded as instrument #108119853. The recorded DA requires
compliance with a specific concept plan and building elevations.
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 3
In 2014, the property received approval to modify the development agreement #108119853 (MDA-
14-003) to develop the property as a mixed use development consisting of office, multi-family and
retail uses. The subject DA recorded as Instrument #114034780.
VII. ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting to amend the recorded development agreement (DA) approved in 2014 (Instrument
114034780). The approved concept plan depicts a mixed-use development consisting of three (3) retail
buildings ranging in size between 7,000 square feet and 11,250 square feet adjacent to Overland Road, 180-unit
multi-family development and a single office pad site adjacent to Interstate I-84.
A conditional use permit for the multi-family portion of the site has been granted and is currently developing
with a 190 unit apartment complex.
The applicant now desires to amend the approved concept plan in order to develop a nursing care facility. The
new concept plan depicts a 48,000 square foot nursing care facility, two (2) 7,000 square foot retail buildings,
190 unit apartment complex and future office pad site. The proposed concept plan also illustrates access to the
development, site layout, parking and site circulation.
It is important to note the property to the west has been approved to develop with a vehicle sales facility (Bish’s
RV). The recorded plat approved an access to W. Overland Road and annotates cross access to said property.
The submitted concept plan was revised to allow the interconnectivity. Staff has concerns with recreational
vehicles using the shared access. With the approval of the Bish’s RV Sales Facility, the applicant was approved
an access to Overland Road, farther to the west. Staff encourages the applicant to coordinate with the adjacent
property owner to clearly delineate that the shared driveway is to be used as a vehicle sales entrance only and
the western most driveway is to be used as a service entrance to minimize conflicts between the two uses.
In conjunction with the concept plan, the applicant has also submitted architectural elevations for the assisted
living facility. The submitted elevations incorporate the following building materials: stone wainscot, a mix of
wood siding, variations in the wall planes and rooflines and decorative corbels. In general staff is supportive of
the submitted elevations however; final design is subject to the design standards set forth in UDC 11-3A-19 and
the Architectural Standards Manual.
With a recent update to the Unified Development Code (UDC), nursing care facilities are now allowed through
the approval of a conditional use permit; it was a prohibited use with the previous development agreement
modification.
NOTE: A separate CUP application has been processed and is scheduled to be heard by the Planning and
Zoning Commission at their August 4th hearing.
DA Modification: In general, staff is supportive of the concept plan, building square footages and design
concepts proposed with the subject application. To move forward with development of the site as proposed by
the applicant, staff recommends the following DA modifications (NOTE: The recorded development agreement
for this property recorded with the incorrect DA provisions. To correct the discrepancy, Staff has included the
new DA provisions, modified provisions and the original DA provisions that were required to be included in the
amended DA:
1. Development of the property shall substantially comply with the concept plan and building elevations
attached in Exhibit A.3 and A.5 and the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines
contained in the Architectural Standards Manual.
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 4
2. Other than the one (1) previously approved access to Overland Road (PP-07-013), direct lot access to
Overland Road is prohibited unless waived by City Council in accord with UDC 11-3A-3.
3. The applicant shall provide cross access to the property to the west (Parcel #S1213336006) through the
retail portion of the development as depicted on the Kennedy Commercial Center Subdivision Final Plat
FP-07-036).
4. Any future multi-family use on the site must obtain approval of a conditional use permit and comply
with the specific use standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27.
5. Sanitary sewer service to the Kennedy Commercial development is currently being accomplished via a
temporary lift station which pumps to a discharge manhole in Overland Road. It shall be the
responsibility of this developer to commission a study of the lift station capacity, and make any
upgrades that are needed to accommodate this new proposal.
6. A 25’ wide landscape buffer between uses shall be constructed along the western boundary of this
property adjacent to the residential portion of the development. The buffer shall be constructed in
accord with UDC 11-3B-9 and is intended to eliminate the need for the existing industrial zoned
property to the west (Parcel #S1213336006) to construct a land use buffer.
7. Any nursing care facility use on the site must obtain approval of a conditional use permit and comply
with the specific use standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-29.
Staff recommends approval of the development agreement modification with recommended provisions attached
in Exhibit A.6.
VIII. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings/Other
1. Vicinity/Zoning Map
2. Approved Concept Plan
3. Proposed Concept Plan
4. Approved Elevations
5. Proposed Elevations
6. Proposed Change to the Development Agreement
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 5
Exhibit A.1: Vicinity/Zoning Map
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 6
Exhibit A.2: Approved Concept Plan
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 7
Exhibit A.3: Proposed Concept Plan
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 8
Exhibit A.4: Approved Building Elevations
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 9
Exhibit A.5: Proposed Building Elevations
EXHIBIT A
Harmony Hills Assisted Living – MDA H-2016-0061 10
Exhibit A.6: Proposed Changes to the Development Agreement (The changes below represent the
modified changes to the amended development agreement. DA provisions 5.1.2, 5.1.3 and the addition of
5.1.6 represent the changes City Council approved with the MDA Findings for file # MDA-14-003. These DA
provisions were never incorporated into the recorded DA. Staff is correcting the error with the subject
application.)
5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
5.1.1 Development of the property shall substantially comply with the concept plan and building elevations
attached in Exhibit A.3 and A.5 and the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines
contained in the Architectural Standards Manual.
5.1.2 Other than the one (1) previously approved access to Overland Road (PP-07-013), direct lot access to
Overland Road is prohibited unless waived by City Council in accord with UDC 11-3A-3.
5.1.3 The applicant shall provide cross access to the property to the west (Parcel #S1213336006) through the
retail portion of the development as depicted on the Kennedy Commercial Center Subdivision Final Plat
FP-07-036). A copy of the recorded cross access agreement shall be submitted with the first certificate
of zoning compliance application for the retail portion of the development.
5.1.6 A 25’ wide landscape buffer between uses shall be constructed along the western boundary of this
property adjacent to the residential portion of the development. The buffer shall be constructed in
accord with UDC 11-3B-9 and is intended to eliminate the need for the existing industrial zoned
property to the west (Parcel #S1213336006) to construct a land use buffer.
5.1.7 Any nursing care facility use on the site must obtain approval of a conditional use permit and comply
with the specific use standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-29.
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4C
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: Bowen Collins & Associates
Approval of Task Order 10746 to Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. for the SCADA System
Upgrades PRV's 1, 14,16,17,18, and 19 for the Not -To -Exceed amount of $76,000.00
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Page 1
Memo
To: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk
From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager
CC: Dean Stacey/PM
Date: 06/06/2017
Re: June 13 th City Council Meeting Agenda Item
The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the
June 13 th City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration.
Approval of Task Order 10746 to Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. for the SCADA
System Upgrades PRV’s 1,14,16,17,18, and 19 for the Not-To-Exceed amount of
$76,000.00.
Recommended Council Action: Award of Task Order 10746 to BOWEN
COLLINS & ASSOCIATES, INC. for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $76,000 and
authority to Purchasing Manager to sign Purchase Order 17-0319.
Thank you for your consideration.
City of Meridian
Purchasing Dept.
CONTRACT / AGENDA CHECKLIST
Date: REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Project Name:
Project Manager: Department Representative:
Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer:
Contract Amount: Is this a change order? Yes No Change Order No.
Fund: Budget Available (Attach Report):
Department Yes No Construction
GL Account FY Budget: Task Order
Project Number: Enhancement: Yes No Professional Service
Equipment
Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No
Grant #: Type of Grant
Debarment Status (Grant/Federal Funded Projects Only)
Low Bidder Highest Rated Master Agreement Category
(Bid Results Attached) Yes No (Ratings Attached) Yes No Date MSA Roster Approved:
Typical Award Yes No
If no please state circumstances and conclusion:
Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period:
PW License Expiration Date: Corporation Status
Insurance Certificates Received (Date): Expiration Date: Rating: A++
Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): Rating:
Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes No
(Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000)
Reason Consultant Selected 1 Performance on past projects
Check all that apply Quality of work On Budget
On Time Accuracy of Construction Est
2 Qualified Personnel
3 Availability of personnel
4 Local of personnel
Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation:
Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: Approval Date By:
Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted
(Only for PW Construction Projects)
NTP Date:
N/A
estimated cost to the Project Manager. Projet manager reviewed tasks and cost with supervisor and updated as needed, then forwarded to
Purchasing Department for their review and approval and issuance.
Held in -person meeting to discuss Task Order requirements and had consultant create draft design tasks listing and scope then email the package
If yes, has policy been purchased?
PROJECT MANAGER TO COMPLETE THIS SECTION ONLY
BASIS OF AWARD
N/A N/A
N/A
CONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION
22-Sep-15
N/A
Bowen Collins & Associates, INC
Contract Type Budget Information
N/A N/A
60
3490
94300
10746
$76,000.00 N/A
FY17
5/18/2017 Public Works
SCADA System Upgrades PRV's 1,14,16,17,18 And 19
Dean Stacey Dean Stacey
June 8, 2017
17-0319 June 6, 2017 N/A
AWARD INFORMATION
Goodstanding
8/17/2016 7/16/2017
Supervisor Date
Kyle Radek 5/18/2017
N/A N/A
(Type in date verified and the status)
N/A
TASK ORDER
7A
RFP / RFQ
www.sam.gov
BID
E IDIANt_6�--
Public IDAHO
Works Department
TO: KEITH WATTS
FROM: DEAN STACEY
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
City Council Members:
Keith Bird
)oe Borton
Whe Cavener
Genesis Milam
Anne Little Roberts
Ty Palmer
DATE: June 7, 2017
SUBJECT: TASK ORDER WITH BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN
AND PROGRAMMING TO UPGRADE SCADA SYSTEM - PRV'S 1, 14,
16,17,18,19 — FOR THE NOT -TO -EXCEED AMOUNT OF $76,000.
I. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS
Dean Stacey, Engineering Project Manager 489-0386
Kyle Radek, Assistant City Engineer 489-0343
Warren Stewart, City Engineer 489-0350
Dale Bolthouse, PW Director 985-1257
II. DESCRIPTION
A. Background
The City of Meridian operates a water system with over 36,000 residential
accounts. Public Works is upgrading the existing water Supervisory Control and
Data Acquisition (SCADA) radio systems. The current City Master Plan calls for
assessing the system and developing / implementing improvements to make it
more reliable. Currently the control panels, Programmable Logic Controllers
(PLC's), and associated wiring for the 6 sites are housed in below -ground vaults
that are wet and damaging to electrical equipment. The sites were selected to be
part of this project based on priority due to possible flooding issues, location, and
required SCADA data.
B. Proposed Project Description
This project consists of creating site layouts, electrical schematics, bill of
materials and designing control panels that will allow the SCADA equipment to
be brought above ground. An additional component of the design is to program
the new radios and SCADA system once construction has been completed.
Page 1 of 2
III. IMPACT
A. Fiscal Impacts
Funding is available in the Capital Electronics enhancement for the design of this
project. The Task Order cost is $76,000.
Project Costs:
Fiscal Year 2017 Construction Contract $76,000
Total $76,000
Total Project Cost $76,000
Available Project Funding
Fiscal Year 2017 Account Code / Codes
3490-94300 $94,000
Total Funding $94,000
Time Constraints
Execution of this Task Order will allow Public Works to complete the
design portion of this project in fiscal year 2017.
Department Approval: (..1 Ss
Page 2 of 2
City Of Melidiarl
Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Sandra - Unpostecl Transactions Incfuded In Report
60 - E'Iteq)liae Eund
3{90 - Water Construction Proj6cts
FrcIi] 10/1/2A76'thraugh 9 /3A /2011
Budget with CurrenE Year
Ac ! ua.I
Budge!
Remaining
Percent of
Budget
Remaining
300,000.00
300,000.00
2Aa, t81 .23
245 ,181 .23
94,218=',l1
94 ,218 .11
31 . 413
31 . 419
94100
Capitaf Outlay
Capital - Electronics
Total Capital Outlay
DEPT EXPENDITURES
TOTAL EXPENDlTURES
00300 245 ,',787 -23
205, 181.23
94,278 .11
94 ,21 8 .1t
3l .411
IU0,0{l{r.00
DaEe: 5/ 31/ 1l 1t:46:12 Atl
TASK ORDER NO. 10746
Pursuant to the
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER) AND BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES
(ENGINEER)
This Task Order is made this 13 day of June, 2017 and entered into by and between
the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "City", and accepted by (BOWEN COLLINS),
hereinafter referred to as "Engineer" pursuant to the mutual promises, covenant and
conditions contained in the Master Agreement (category 7A) between the above
mentioned parties dated September 22, 2015. The Project Name for this Task Order
10746 is as follows:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CONTROLS DESIGN AND PROGRAMMING —
PRV 1, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19 Control System Upgrades
SCOPE OF WORK
Our scope is to provide control panel design services to replace the existing SCADA
PACK PLC's at the following sites; PRV 1,14,16,17,18,19. The control panel will be
designed to utilize existing instrumentation and provide spare 1/0 for future use, Our
scope also includes control panel programming services to start-up the new control
panel that will be constructed and installed at PRV 1,14,16,17,18,19 sites.
Task 1 — Design Services
• Site survey to identify existing 1/0.
• Develop 1/0 list for current and future needs.
• Coordinate with Idaho Power
• Coordinate with HOA's
• Provide control panel and site layout drawings suitable for construction.
• Provide bid documents (specifications as needed).
Deliverables
• 90% review documents.
Task Order 10746 Controls (Design and Programming — PRV 1, 14,16,17,18,19 control system upgrades
Page 1 of 4
BOWEN COLLINS
100% Construction documents incorporating review comments
Task 2 - Bidding Services. Create bid schedule. Attend kickoff meetings. Answer bidding questions
Deliverables. Bid schedule
Task 3 - Construction Management Services. Review submittals for control panel hardware. Review submittals for instrumentation. RFI's. O&M and Record drawings
Deliverables. Submittal review
Task 4 - Programming Services. Program PLC, HMl, and provide onsite start-up for PRV 1,14,16,17,18,19. Program MDS radio and provide onsite start-up for PRV 'l ,14,16,17,18,19. Program SCADA screens at water department. Screen shots will include the
following:
Flow speed (GPM)
Flow totalizing (Gallons)
Low side pressure (PSl)
High side pressure (PSl)
Alarms
Vault Flood Alarm
lntrusion Alarms
Moisture Alarm
Set points Screen will include:
Low side pressure set point
High side pressure set point
Deliverableso Electronic copy of the PLC, HMl, and SCADA programs that are created and
modified during the project.
Task Order 10746 Controls Design and Programming - PRV 1,14,16,17,18,19 conkolsyslem upgrades
BOWEN COLLINS
Page 2 of 4
ASSUMPTIONS
While preparing our scope of services and fee estimate, we have made the following
assumptions:
• On Site installation of new SCADA control panel, power quality monitoring panel,
and all instrumentation will be complete before BC&A integrator is called out to
verify 1/0 loop checks and deploy programming.
• The remote site communication will utilize the GE MDS 900Mhz radio network.
• On Site verification of the radio path study would not be required.
• Any additional programming or screen shots outside of the listed scope of work
will be billed on an hourly basis outside this task order amount.
TIME OF COMPLETION and COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
The following schedule is based on a Notice to Proceed (NTP) from the City by Julie
2()'i'i and resulting in Final Design being completed by `)eptei7 bei :30, 2011 and Final
Programming completed by Ocfc bet 31, 2018. An NTP issued on a different date will
change the schedule accordingly.
COMPENSATION AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE
Task
Description
Due Date
Compensation
1
Design Services
■ 9/30/2017
■ $33,000
2
Bid Services
■ 5/30/2018
• $4,000
3
Construction Management Services
■ 6/30/18
■ $8,000
4
Programming Services
■ 9/30/2018
$31,000
TASK ORDER
TOTAL: $76,000
The Nat -To -Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order
No. 10746 is seventy six thousand dollars ($76,000). No compensation will be paid
over the Not -to -Exceed amount without prior written approval by the City in the form of a
Change Order. The hourly rates for services and direct expenses are per the Master
Agreement (by this reference made a part hereof) and will be the basis for any additions
and/or deletions in services rendered. Travel and meals are excluded from this Task
Order unless explicitly listed in the Scope of Services AND Payment Schedule,
CITY OF MERIDIAN
BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES
BY:
Greg Loscher, Principal
Task Order 10746 Controls Design and Programming -- PRV 1,14,16,17,18,19 control system upgrades
Page 3 of 4
BOWEN COLLINS
Dated:
Attest:
C JAY LES,�ICJTY CLERK
Purchasing.App ova/
BY:4- /tJ
KEITH, & Pu
S, roQsing Manager
City Project Manager
DEAN STACEY
6/2120'17
Ciiy or w
E IDIAN�..
� IDAHO
SEAL/
Deparitpe; ?t Appro ,al
r
BY: / / % -
WA REN STEWA/ l , City Engineer
Dated: 6 / /
Task Order 10746 Controls Design and Programming — PRV 1,14,16,17,18,19 control system upgrades
BOWEN COLLINS
Page 4 of 4
E IDIAN
IDAHO Purchase Order
Attention: Dean Stacey
61612017 1 7-0319
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST BROADWAY AVE.
MERIDIAN, ID 83642
(208) 888-4433
Vendor Address:
BOWEN COLLINS &ASSOCIATES, INC
154 E 14000 S
DRAPER, UT 84020
SCADA System Upgrades PRV's 1,14,16,17,18,19
Purchasing Manager:
Special lnstructions
Billing
Address:
Shipping
Address:
Attn: Finance
33 E Broadway Ave
Meridian, lD 83642
33 E Broadway Ave.
Ste.200
Meridian, lD 83642
Shipping Method:
FOB:
Unit
Dollar
Quantity
76000.00 1 .00
Purchase Order Total:
Total
76,000.00
$76,000.00
contract Po to Task order 10746 by Bowen collins & Associates dated 61212017. council approve d 6t13t2017 Not-to-ExceedS76,000 60-3490-94300-10246 Cale Mgmt 57060
Description
Contraclor
destination
lJnit Price
BOWECOL-01 SBARKER
'4��RO" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
DATE(MM/DD/YYYY)
8/2/2016
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER
American Insurance & Investment Corp.
448 South 400 EastE-MAIL
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
CONTACT
NAME:
P 1C, (801) 364-3434 ac No): (801) 355-5234
E:t
ADDRESS:
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
INSURER A: Travelers Indemnity Company 25658
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
INSURED
INSURERS: Twin City Fire Insurance Co 29459
INSURER C:XL Specialty Insurance Company 37885
Bowen Collins & Associates
INSURER D:
Attn: Jeff Beckman
154 East 14000 South
Draper, UT 84020
INSURER E:
07/16/2016
07/1612017
INSURER F:
rsw r.re r•CCTICIr`ATC NI IIIIIRFR• KtVINILJN NUmrSGK:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
LTR
TYPE OF INSURANCEADDLISUBR
ISD
D
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFF
MM/DD/YYYY
POLICY EXP
MM/DD/YYYY
LIMITS
A
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Meridian, ID 83642
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
DAMAGE TO RENTE
PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 300,000
CLAIMS MADE a OCCUR
68027941-324
07/16/2016
07/1612017
MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000
PERSONAL 8 ADV INJURY $ 1,000,00
GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER,
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000
PRO-
POLICY 1�1 JECT LOC
$
OTHER:
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Ea accidentSINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000
BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
A
X ANY AUTO
BA211431539
07116/2016
07/16/2017
BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
ALL OWNED SCHEDULED
AUTOS AS
NON-OWNED
HIRED AUTOS AUTOS
DAMAGE $
Per accident
A
X
UMBRELLA LIAB
EXCESS LIAB
X
OCCUR
CLAIMS -MADE
CUP6766Y453
07/16/2016
07/16/2017
EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,000
AGGREGATE $ 5,000,000
DED I X I RETENTION $ 10,000
$
B
WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE YNNI
UB2H433336
08/04/2016
08/04/2017
X PER OTH-
STATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,00
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
N 1 A
1 000,000
E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $ r
C
Prof Liab Claim Made
DPR9807460
08/04/2016
08/04/2017
Per Claim Limit 5,000,000
C
Retro Date 07/01/97
DPR9807460
08/04/2016
08/04/2017
Aggregate Limit 5,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached H more space Is required)
City of Meridian is named as an additional insured with respects General and Auto Liabilty as per the contract.
r`ANr_FI I ATIrTN
V 11100-LU14 AL UKU L V1%rVKA 1IVN. P111 rR911W ,COCl VCU.
ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
City of Meridian
ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
Purchasing Manager
33 East Broadway Ave
Meridian, ID 83642
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
V 11100-LU14 AL UKU L V1%rVKA 1IVN. P111 rR911W ,COCl VCU.
ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
IDSOS Search Results
Search Result Summary
IDAHO SECRETARY OF STATE
Search Results
Page I of 1
Lawerence Denney, Secretary ol State
Filed 30 Jul 2009
CORPORATIO N
GOODSTAN D] N G
I New Search ]
Search Results 1 through 1
( BOWEN, COLLINS & ASSOCIATES, INC. ... BOWEN, COLLINS & ASSOCIATES, INC. )
BOWEN, COLLINS & ASSOCIATES, INC. rview oetaitsr
Organizational ID / Filing number: C183990
154 E 14000 S
DRAPER, UT 84020
Idaho Secretarv of State's Main Page State of Idaho Home Paqe
Comments, questions or suggestions can be emailed to:sosinfo@so s.idaho.qov
https ://www.accessidaho. org/publ iclsos/corp/search.html
61612017
r
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4D
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: WRRF Boise River Outfall Pump Station Upgrades
Approval of Award of Bid and Agreement to Irminger Construction, Inc. for the "WRRF
Boise River Outfall Pump Station Upgrades" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of
$802,527.00
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
CONTRACT CHECKLIST
Date: REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Project Name:
Project Manager: Contract Amount:
Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer:
Is this a change order? Yes No Change Order No.
Fund: Budget Available ( Purchasing attach report ):
Department Yes No Construction
GL Account FY Budget: Task Order
Project Number: Enhancement: Yes No Professional Service
Equipment
Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No Grant
Grant #: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status (Federal Funded)
Print and Attach the determination Print, attach and amend bid by addendum (if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach
Master Agreement Category
(Bid Results Attached) Yes No (Ratings Attached) Yes No Date MSA Roster Approved:
Typical Award Yes No
If no please state circumstances and conclusion:
Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends:
PW License Expiration Date: Corporation Status
Insurance Certificates Received (Date): Expiration Date: Rating: A++
Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): Rating: A+
Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes No
(Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000)
Reason Consultant Selected 1 Performance on past projects
Check all that apply Quality of work On Budget
On Time Accuracy of Construction Est
2 Qualified Personnel
3 Availability of personnel
4 Local of personnel
Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation:
Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: By:
Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted
(Only for PW Construction Projects)
NTP Date:
Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final
$802,527 Garrick
If yes, has policy been purchased?
Contractor - Irminger Construction / Design Engineer - Mountain Waterworks
III. Contract Type II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete)
60
3590
96152
10704.b
TASK ORDER RFP / RFQ BID
VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete)
6/1/2017
Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected
VIII. AWARD INFORMATION
Approval Date
Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved
June 8, 2017
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
6/1/2017 3/11/2018
Fy17
6/7/2017 Public Works
WRRF BRO Pump Station Upgrades
V. BASIS OF AWARD
5/31/2017 June 7, 2017
IV. GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded projects
VI. CONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Goodstanding 026529-AA-1-3 5/31/2018
Page 1
Memo
To: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk,
From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager
CC: Garrick Nelson/PM
Date: 6/8/2017
Re: June 13 th City Council Meeting Agenda Item
The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the
June 13 th City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration.
Approval of Award of Bid and Agreement to Irminger Construction, Inc. for the
“WRRF Boise River Outfall Pump Station Upgrades” project for a Not-To-Exceed
amount of $802,527.00
Recommended Council Action: Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement to
IRMINGER CONSTRUCTION, INC. for the Not-To-Exceed amount of
$802,527.00.
Thank you for your consideration.
City of Meridian
Purchasing Dept.
Detailed Stath/nt
City Of uelidian
of Revenues and Expenditures
Capital Outlay
BoiseRiveroutfal ]
Surface Wate! Sanpfing
Statioo Upgrades (OutfaII )
3590 - Wr Conltruction Project.
60 - lnt6rpria6 Eund
Ero]lr 10/1/2016 rhrough 9/30/2011
Budger with Culreot Year
Actual
Budget
Rema in ing
Budget
Remaining
- aev aVexp neport Keith
96L52
10599
10704
10704 -a
WRRF BRO Pump Station,
seal, l{ate! Pump station,
Boise River Outfall Pump
Station - Design
Total Capital Outlay
't53,629 -04
250/000.00
681.00
145,690.00
0 .00
0 ,00
681.00
145,590.00
1s3,629 .O0
250, 000 .00
0.00
0.00
100,009
100.00r
0 .008
0.009
1,150,000.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Date. 5/31/lt 02:43.03 PM
___1.,_t!_q,_9_q_q-_q_0
___-_1_9-€,1_lt ,_9_0
145,3?1.00
___L_!_qL,_q2_9.,_q-0
t,403,629.40
81 .2't \
81 .2'7 \
E IDIAN
BID RESULTS
BID NAME: BOISE RIVER OUTFALL PUMP STATION UPGRADES 2i30DUE DATE & TIME: MAY 23 2017
BID NUMBER: PW -1732-10704.8
Opened by:
Attest:
VENDOR
o
c
.9
E E
E oop
dl j
-o
BID AMOUNT
S-I-AF- 0-qtstwctroN "",| . ?rt,1P7. -D.ascao6 E r.tr.,/bN-. tu3-ednu LD Stb ozt-
KSCI ,/'bbz. to) '
tSIYI,NLER- (-o r >1'bZ, 5Zz-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIII
IDAHO
CI
T
Y
O
F
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
:
B
o
i
s
e
R
i
v
e
r
O
u
t
f
a
l
l
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
o
i
n
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
BI
D
A
B
S
T
R
A
C
T
BI
D
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
en
t
e
r
b
i
d
o
p
e
n
i
n
g
d
a
t
e
It
e
m
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Qt
y
U
n
i
t
Un
i
t
Pr
i
c
e
Bi
d
I
t
e
m
To
t
a
l
Un
i
t
Pr
i
c
e
Bi
d
I
t
e
m
To
t
a
l
Un
i
t
Pr
i
c
e
Bi
d
I
t
e
m
To
t
a
l
Un
i
t
Pr
i
c
e
Bid Item TotalUnit PriceBid Item Total
Mo
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
1
L
S
5,
9
4
1
.
0
0
$
5
,
9
4
1
.
0
0
$
4
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
2
,
3
6
3
.
0
0
$
4
2
,
3
6
3
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
5
7
4
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
5
7
4
.
0
0
$ 60,968.00 $ 60,968.00 $
Ea
r
t
h
w
o
r
k
,
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
F
i
n
i
s
h
i
n
g
1
L
S
28
,
6
2
3
.
0
0
$
2
8
,
6
2
3
.
0
0
$
3
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
,
7
1
1
.
0
0
$
3
0
,
7
1
1
.
0
0
$
2
5
,
5
9
7
.
0
0
$
2
5
,
5
9
7
.
0
0
$ 53,166.00 $ 53,166.00 $
Ya
r
d
P
i
p
i
n
g
1
L
S
27
,
6
1
5
.
0
0
$
2
7
,
6
1
5
.
0
0
$
2
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
7
,
5
3
8
.
0
0
$
1
7
,
5
3
8
.
0
0
$
2
2
,
7
4
1
.
0
0
$
2
2
,
7
4
1
.
0
0
$ 73,410.00 $ 73,410.00 $
BR
O
a
n
d
N
P
W
D
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
1
L
S
20
,
3
0
4
.
0
0
$
2
0
,
3
0
4
.
0
0
$
3
2
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
2
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
5
,
7
1
6
.
0
0
$
3
5
,
7
1
6
.
0
0
$
2
4
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
4
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$ 88,980.00 $ 88,980.00 $
BR
O
a
n
d
N
P
W
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
1
L
S
19
4
,
8
6
3
.
0
0
$
1
9
4
,
8
6
3
.
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
1
,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
1
,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$
2
6
4
,
9
4
1
.
0
0
$
2
6
4
,
9
4
1
.
0
0
$ 338,154.00 $ 338,154.00 $
BR
O
a
n
d
N
P
W
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
1
L
S
12
9
,
6
1
3
.
0
0
$
1
2
9
,
6
1
3
.
0
0
$
1
0
5
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
5
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
4
9
,
8
9
6
.
0
0
$
2
4
9
,
8
9
6
.
0
0
$
1
2
0
,
7
5
4
.
0
0
$
1
2
0
,
7
5
4
.
0
0
$ 235,290.00 $ 235,290.00 $
BR
O
a
n
d
N
P
W
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
I
n
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
L
S
19
7
,
4
6
6
.
0
0
$
1
9
7
,
4
6
6
.
0
0
$
1
9
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
9
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
9
5
,
6
4
1
.
0
0
$
1
9
5
,
6
4
1
.
0
0
$
1
9
8
,
0
5
3
.
0
0
$
1
9
8
,
0
5
3
.
0
0
$ 219,560.00 $ 219,560.00 $
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
e
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
1
L
S
14
,
9
3
9
.
0
0
$
1
4
,
9
3
9
.
0
0
$
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
9
9
5
.
0
0
$
6
,
9
9
5
.
0
0
$
4
,
4
7
2
.
0
0
$
4
,
4
7
2
.
0
0
$ 26,517.00 $ 26,517.00 $
Ne
w
S
e
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
L
S
70
,
8
7
3
.
0
0
$
7
0
,
8
7
3
.
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
5
,
6
3
1
.
0
0
$
6
5
,
6
3
1
.
0
0
$
5
7
,
3
2
1
.
0
0
$
5
7
,
3
2
1
.
0
0
$ 86,437.00 $ 86,437.00 $
Ne
w
S
e
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
I
n
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
L
S
14
,
2
8
0
.
0
0
$
1
4
,
2
8
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
4
,
5
5
9
.
0
0
$
1
4
,
5
5
9
.
0
0
$
1
4
,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$
1
4
,
0
8
0
.
0
0
$ 15,104.00 $ 15,104.00 $
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
S
t
a
r
t
u
p
1
L
S
13
,
9
4
5
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
9
4
5
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
8
4
4
.
0
0
$
2
,
8
4
4
.
0
0
$
8
,
3
4
9
.
0
0
$
8
,
3
4
9
.
0
0
$ 5,900.00 $ 5,900.00 $
De
m
o
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
1
L
S
3,
3
4
7
.
0
0
$
3
,
3
4
7
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
2
7
5
.
0
0
$
2
,
2
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
5
7
4
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
5
7
4
.
0
0
$ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $
Mi
s
c
.
W
o
r
k
I
t
e
m
s
N
o
t
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
A
b
o
v
e
1
L
S
80
,
7
1
8
.
0
0
$
8
0
,
7
1
8
.
0
0
$
5
6
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$
5
6
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
2
7
5
.
0
0
$
2
,
2
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
1
7
,
9
5
9
.
0
0
$
1
1
7
,
9
5
9
.
0
0
$ -$ -$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$ -$ -$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$ -$ -$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$ -$ -$
TO
T
A
L
B
A
S
E
B
I
D
8
0
2
,
5
2
7
.
0
0
$
8
6
3
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
7
8
,
0
2
4
.
0
0
$
8
8
6
,
1
6
5
.
0
0
$ 1,213,486.00 $ STAR CONSTRUCTION
IR
M
I
N
G
E
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
R
S
C
I
T
H
E
E
W
I
N
G
C
O
.
C
A
S
C
A
D
E
E
N
T
.
CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION
WRRF BOISE RIVER OUTFALL PUMP STATION
PROJECT # 1O7O4.B
INTRODUCTION
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants,
terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Scope of Work:
1.1 CONTRACTOR shall perform and furnish to the City upon execution of this
Contract and receipt of the City's written notice to proceed, all services and work,
and comply in all respects, as specilied in the document titled "Scope of Work" a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this
reference, together with any amendments that may be agreed to in writing by the
parties.
1.2 All documents, drawings and written work product prepared or produced by
the Contractor under this Agreement, including without limitation electronic data
files, are the property of the Contractor; provided, however, the City shall have the
right to reproduce, publish and use all such work, or any part thereof, in any
manner and for any purposes whatsoever and to authorize others to do so. lf any
such work is copyrightable, the Contractor may copyright the same, except that, as
to any work which is copyrighted by the Contractor, the City reserves a royalty-free,
non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use such work, or
any part thereof, and to authorize others to do so.
1.3 The Contractor shall provide services and work under this Agreement
consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable federal,
state and city laws, ordinances, regulations and resolutions. The Contractor
WRRF BRo PUMP STATION UPGRADES page 1 of l3
Project 10704.8
THIS CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION is made this 13th day
of June, 2017, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal
corporation organized under the laws ol the State of ldaho, hereinafter relerred to as
"C|TY", 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642, and lrminoer Construction,
hereinafter relerred to as "CONTRACTOR", whose business address is 25094 Homedale
Rd.. Wilder. lD 83676and whose Public Works Contractor License # is 026529.
Whereas, the City has a need for services involving outfall pump station
construction; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor is specially tralned, experienced and competent
to perform and has agreed to provide such services;
represents and warrants that it will perlorm its work in accordance with generally
accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or prolessions that
are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in eflect at the time ol
performance of this Agreement. Except for that representation and any
representations made or contained in any proposal submitted by the Contractor
and any reports or opinions prepared or issued as part ol the work performed by
the Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor makes no other warranties, either
express or implied, as part of this Agreement.
1 .4 Services and work provided by the Contractor at the City's request under this
Agreement will be performed in a timely manner in accordance with a Schedule of
Work, which the parties hereto shall agree to. The Schedule of Work may be
revised from time to time upon mutual written consent of the parties.
2. Consideration
2.1 The Contractor shall be compensated on a Not-To-Exceed basis as provided
in Exhibit B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by reference made a part
hereol lor the Not-To-Exceed amount of $802,527.00.
2.2 The Contractor shall provide the City with a monthly statement and
supporting invoices, as the work warrants, of fees earned and costs incurred for
services provided during the billing period, which the City will pay within 30 days ol
receipt of a correct invoice and approval by the City. The City will not withhold any
Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax lrom any payment made by
City to Contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Payment of
all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of
Contractor.
2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor shall not be
entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration, compensation, salary,
wages, or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement
including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, transportatlon, drawings, renderings or
mockups. Specif ically, Contractor shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement
to consideration in the form of overtime, health insurance benefits, retirement
benefits, paid holidays or other paid leaves of absence of any type or kind
whatsoever.
3. Term:
3.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, and
shall expire upon (a) completion ol the agreed upon work, (b) or unless sooner
terminated as provided in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and Section 4 below or unless some
other method or time ol termination is listed in Exhibit A.
3.2 Should Contractor default in the performance of this Agreement or materially
breach any ol its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this Agreement by
giving written notification to Contractor.
WRRF BRo PUMP srATloN UPGRADES pase 2 or 13
Project 10704.B
3.3 Should City fail to pay Contractor all or any part of the compensation set forth
in Exhibit B of this Agreement on the date due, Contractor, at the Contractor's
option, may terminate this Agreement if the lailure is not remedied by the City
within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due.
4. Liquidated Damages:
Substantial Completion shall be accomplished within 120 (one hundred twenty)
calendar days f rom Notice to Proceed. This project shall be considered
Substantially Complete when the Owner has full and unrestricted use and benefit
of the facilities, both lrom an operational and safety standpoint, and only minor
incidental work, corrections or repairs remain lor the physical completion of the
total contract. Contractor shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time
period in the amount ol $500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such
payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of
any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty.
Upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall have 150 (one hundred
f ifty) calendar days to complete the work as described herein. Contractor shall be
liable to the City lor any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $500.00
(five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed to be
liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu ol any claim or damage because of
such delay and not be construed as a penalty. See Milestones listed in the
Payment Schedule for Substantial Completion.
5. Termination:
5. 1 lf , through any cause, CONTRACTOR, its otficers, employees, or agents fails
to f ulf ill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates
any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any
record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in
fraud, dishonesty, or any other act ol misconduct in the performance ol this
contract, or if the City Council determines that termination ol this Agreement is in
the best interest ol CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this
Agreement by giving written notice to CONTRACTOR of such termination and
specilying the effective date thereof at least fifteen (15) days belore the effective
date ol such termination. CONTRACTOR may terminate this agreement at any
time by giving at least sixty (60) days notice to CITY.
ln the event ol any termination ol this Agreement, all finished or unlinished
documents, data, and reports prepared by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement
shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and CONTRACTOR shall be
entitled to receive just and equitable compensation lor any work satislactorily
complete hereunder.
5.2 Notwithstanding the above, CONTRACTOR shall not be relieved ol liability to
the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this
WRRF BRo PUMP sTATloN UPGRADES page 3 or 13
Project 10704.8
Agreement by CONTRACTOR, and the CITY may withhold any payments to
CONTRACTOR for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of
damages due the CITY from CONTRACTOR is determined. This provision shall
survive the termination ol this agreement and shall not relieve CONTRACTOR of
its liability to the CITY for damages.
6. lndependent Contractor:
6.1 ln all matters pertaining to this agreement, CONTRACTOR shall be acting as
an independent contractor, and neither CONTRACTOR nor any officer, employee
or agent of CONTRACTOR will be deemed an employee of CITY. Except as
expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to
exercise any rights or power vested in the City and therefore has no authority to
bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the City. The selection and designation ol
the personnel of the CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by
the CITY.
6.2 Contractor, its agents, officers, and employees are and at all times during the
term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent
contractors and not as employees ol the City.
6.3 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the
work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor
shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specilied in this
Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be
subjected to City's control with respect to the physical action or activities of
Contractor in fullillment of this Agreement. lf in the performance ol this Agreement
any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and
exclusively under the direction and supervision and control ol the Contractor.
7. Sub-Contractors:
Contractor shall require that all of its sub-contractors be licensed per State ol ldaho
Statute # 54-1901
8. Removal of Unsatisfactory Employees:
The Contractor shall only f urnish employees who are competent and skilled lor work
under this contract. lf, in the opinion of the City, an employee of the Contractor is
incompetent or disorderly, reluses to perform in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the contract, threatens or uses abusive language while on City
property, or is otherwise unsatisfactory, that employee shall be removed from all
work under this contract.
WRRF BRO PUMP STATION UPGRAOES
Project 10704.8
page 4 of 13
9. lndemnification and lnsurance:
9.1 CONTRACTOR shall indemnily and save and hold harmless CITY and it's
elected oflicials, olficers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and for any and
all losses, claims, actions, judgments lor damages, or iniury to persons or property
and losses and expenses and other costs including litigation costs and attorney's
fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the perlormance of this
Agreement by the CONTRACTOR, its servants, agents, officers, employees,
guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortious
conduct of CITY or its employee s. CONTRACTOR shall maintain, and specilically
tn f reement liabil
n
amounts as follow: General Liabili ty One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident
or occurrence, Automobile Liability lnsurance One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) per
incident or occurrence and Workers' Compensation lnsurance, in the statutory
limits as required by law.. The limits ol insurance shall not be deemed a limitation
of the covenants to indemnily and save and hold harmless CITY; and il CITY
becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein provided,
CONTRACTOR covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless
CITY from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments lor damages or
injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation costs and
attorneys' fees, arising out ol, resulting lrom , or in connection with the
performance of this Agreement by the Contractor or Contractor's officers, employs,
agents, representatives or subcontractors and resulting in or attributable to
personal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible or intangible property,
including use of. CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY with a Certilicate of
lnsurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing CONTRACTOR'S compliance
with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof ol insurance with the
CITY at least ten (10) days prior to the date Contractor begins performance of it's
obligations under this Agreement. ln the event the insurance minimums are
changed, CONTRACTOR shall immediately submit prool ol compliance with the
changed limits. Evidence of all insurance shall be submitted to the City Purchasing
Agent with a copy to Meridian City Accounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue,
Meridian, ldaho 83642.
9.2 lnsurance is to be placed with an ldaho admitted insurer with a Best's rating
of no less than A-.
9.3 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be declared
in writing and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles, self-insured retentions or named
insureds; or the Contractor shall provide a bond, cash or letter ol credit
guaranleeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and delense expenses.
9.4 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, Contractor's lnsurance
coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City's elected oflicers, oflicials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City
WRRF BRo PUMP srATloN UPGRADES page 5 ot 13
Project 10704.8
insu tn n n tn red in the minimum
or the City's elected olficers, olficials, employees and volunteers shall be excess ol
the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with Contractor's insurance
except as to the extent of City's negligence.
9.5 The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability.
9.6 All insurance coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all ol the
insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein.
9.7 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the
Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
10. Time is of the Essence:
The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly ol the essence with
respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure
to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and
a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform.
11. Bonds:
Payment and Perlormance Bonds are required on all Public Works lmprovement
Projects per the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications &
Drawings to the ISPWC, which by this reference are made a part hereof.
Contractor is required to furnish laithful performance and payment bonds in the
amount of 100% of the contract price issued by surety licensed to do business in
the State of ldaho. ln the event that the contract is subsequently terminated for
failure to perlorm, the contractor and/or surety will be liable and assessed for any
and all costs for the re-procurement of the contract services.
All construction and equipment provided under this agreement shall be warranted
for 2 years lrom the date ol the City ol Meridian acceptance per the ISPWC and the
Meridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC and any
modifications, which by this reference are made a part hereof .
All items found to be defective during a warranty inspection and subsequently
corrected will require an additional two (2) year warranty lrom the date ol City's
acceptance ol the corrected work.
13. Changes:
The CITY may, lrom time to time, request changes in the Scope of Work to be
performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the
amount of CONTRACTOR'S compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and
WRRF BRO PUMP STATION UPGRADES page 6 of 13
Project 10704.B
12. Warranty:
between the CITY and CONTRACTOR, shall be incorporated in written
amendments which shall be executed with the same lormalities as this Agreement.
15. Meridian StormwaterSpecifications:
Contractor shall retain all stormwater and erosion control documentation generated
on site during construction including the SWPPP manual, field inspections and
amendments. Prior to final acceptance ol the job by the City the contractor shall
return the lield SWPPP manual and field inspection documents to the City for
review. A completed Contractor Request to File Proiect N.O.T. with the EPA form
shall be provided to the City with the documents. These documents shall be
retained, reviewed and approved by the City prior to f inal acceptance of the pro.iect.
Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with the City to obtain appropriate
ACHD permit(s) and will reimburse the City for fees, fines, or penalties City incurs
due to Contractor's violation of any ACHD policy. City shall certify to ACHD that
Contractor is authorized to obtain a Temporary Highway and Right-otWay Use
Permit from ACHD on City's behall. The parties acknowledge and agree that the
scope ol the agency granted by such certilication is limited to, and conterminous
with, the term and scope of this Agreement.
17. Reports and lnformation:
17.1 At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be
furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as
the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement.
17.2 Contractor shall maintain all writings, documents and records prepared or
compiled in connection with the performance ol this Agreement for a minimum of
four (4) years from the termination or completion ol this or Agreement. This
includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static, photographic and every
other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or
WRRF BRO PUMP STATION UPGRADES PAgE 7 Of .13
Project 10704.8
14. Taxes:
The City of Meridian is exempt from Federal and State taxes and will execute the
required exemption certilicates for items purchased and used by the City. ltems
purchased by the City and used by a contractor are subject to Use Tax. All other
taxes are the responsibility of the Contractor and are to be included in the
Contractor's Bid pricing.
All construction projects require either a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) or an erosion sediment control plan (ESCP) as specilied in the City of
Meridian Construction Stormwater Management Program (CSWMP) manual. The
CSWMP manual containing the procedures and guidelines can be found at this
address: http://www.meridiancitv.orq/environmental.aspx?id='l 361 B.
16. ACHD:
representation including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols or any
combination thereof.
18. Audits and lnspections:
At any time during normal business hours and as olten as the CITY may deem
necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all ol
CONTRACTOR'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall permit the CITY to audit, examine, and make excerpts or
transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices,
materials, payrolls, records ol personnel, conditions of employment and other data
relating to all matters covered by this Agreement.
19. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material:
No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to
copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CITY shall have
unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any
reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement.
ln performing the work herein, Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions ol
Title Vl and Vll of the Civil Rights Act, Revenue Sharing Act Title 31, U.S. Code
Section 2176. Specifically, the Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any
employee or applicant lor employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national
origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. Contractor will take
affirmative action during employment or training to insure that employees are
treated without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political
afliliation, marital status, or handicap. ln perlorming the Work required herein,
CONTRACTOB shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or
local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis ol race, color, religion,
sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability.
21. Employment of Bona Fide ldaho Residents:
Contractor must comply with ldaho State Statute 44-1002 which states that the
Contractor employ ninety-five percent (95%) bona fide ldaho residents.
22. Advice of Attorney:
Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement. lt has
received independent legal advice lrom its attorney's or the opportunity to seek such
advice.
23. Attorney Fees:
Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this
WRRF BRO PUMP STATION UPGRADES page I ot 13
Project 10704.B
20. Equal Employment Opportunity:
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as
may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys'lees as determined by a
Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate
contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forleiture
of this Agreement.
24. ConstructionandSeverability:
ll any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenlorceable, such holding will
not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part ol this Agreement so long as
the remainder ol the Agreement is reasonably capable ol completion.
25- Waiver of Default:
Waiver of delault by either pafi to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver
of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement
shall not be deemed to be a waiver ol any other or subsequent breach, and shall
not be construed to be a modilication ol the terms of this Agreement unless this
Agreement is modified as provided above.
26. Entire Agreement:
This Agreement contains the entire agreement ol the parties and supersedes any
and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written, whether previous to the
execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith.
27. Assignment:
28. Payment Request:
Payment requests shall be submitted to City ol Meridian through the City's project
management software. The Project Manager will compare the invoice against the
Payment Schedule in the Agreement for compliance. Upon approval that the work
has been done and is in compliance with the Agreement, the Proiect Manager will
approve the pay request for processing. City of Meridian payment terms are Net 30
from the date City receives a correct invoice. Final payment will not be released
until the City has received a tax release from the Tax Commission.
29. Cleanup:
Contractor shall keep the worksite clean and lree from debris. At completion of
work and prior to requesting linal inspection, the Contractor shall remove all traces
ol waste materials and debris resulting lrom the work. Final payment will not be
made il cleanup has not been performed.
WRRF BRo PUMP srATloN UPGRADES page 9 of '13
Project 10704.8
It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that CONTRACTOR
shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights under
this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent ol CITY.
30. Order of Precedence:
The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement, the Invitation for Bid
document, then the winning bidders submitted bid document.
31. Compliance with Laws:
In performing the scope of work required hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall comply
with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local
governments.
32. Applicable Law:
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian.
33. Notices:
Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless
otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed
communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt
requested, addressed as follows:
CITY CONTRACTOR
City of Meridian IRMINGER CONSTRUCTION, Inc.
Purchasing Manager Attn: Travis Conger, President
33 E Broadway Ave 25094 Homedale Rd.
Meridian, ID 83642 Wilder, ID 83676
208-489-0417 Phone: 208-800-9616
Email: iccitravis@gmail.com
Idaho Public Works License #026529
Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving
written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided.
34. Approval Required:
This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of
Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
BY: -
TAMM de RD, MAYOR
Dated:
WRRF BRO PUMP STATION UPGRADES
Project 10704.8
IRMINGER CONSTRUCTION, INC.
BY:
TRAVIS CON , RESIDENT
Dated: !� " s ~rte
page 10 of 13
Approved by Council:_ 6 / /� / 6-�9j7
Attest:
CJ C S,IT CLERK
Purchasin pproval
BY:
KEITHWATTS, Purchasing Manager
Dated:. 6-5-1-1
Project Manager
Garrick Nelson
Depart ent A aI
BY:
WA EN STE T, City Engineer
Dated: 1-2!5 /j �?
WRRF BRO PUMP STATION UPGRADES page 11 of 13
Project 10704.13
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
SPECIFICATIONS / SCOPE OF WORK
All construction work shall be done in accordance with the current version
of the ldaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC), the 2013
City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC (and any
Addendums).
See separate attached documents:
PLANS by Mountain Waterworks, lnc. dated March 2017
(61 of pages)
SPECIFICATIONS by Mountain Waterworks dated
March 2017 lsos ot pages)
WRRF BRO PUMP STATION UPGRADES
Project 10704.8
a
a
page 12 of 13
REFER TO INVITATION TO BID PW.1732.10704.8
ALL ADDENDUMS, ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the
Invitation to Bid Package # PW-1732-10704.8, are by this reference
made a part hereof.
A
MILESTONE / PAYMENTSCHEDULE
Total and complete compensation lor this Agreement shall not exceed
$802,527.00.
Milestone 1 Substantial Completion 120 Days lrom Notice to Proceed
Milestone 2 Final Completion 150 Days f rom Notice to Proceed
PRICING SCHEDULE
Contract includes lurnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals as required for the
WRRF BOSIE RIVER OUTFALL PUMP STATION UPGRADES per IFB PW-1732-10704.B.
NOT TO EXCEED CONTRACT TOTAL $802J27Jt0
Contracl is a not to exceed amount. Line item pricing below will be used lor invoice verilication and any
additional increases or decreases ln work requested by city, The City will pay the contractor based on
actual quantities ol each item ot work in accordance with the conlract documents.
Contract Pricing Schedule
Item No.Description Quantity Unit Unit Price
Mobilization 1 LS ss,941.0O
Ea rthwork, Grading, and Finishing 1 LS s28,623.0O
Yard Piping 1 LS
BRO and NPW Demolition 1 LS s20,304.0o
BRO and NPW Pump Station Mechanical 1 LS
BRO and NPW Pump Station Building 1 LS s129,613.0O
BRO and NPW Electrical and lnstrumentation 1 s197,466.00
Existing Seal Water Pump Station Demolition 1 LS s14,939.0O
New Seal Water Pump Station 1 LS s70,873.0O
New Seal Water Electrical and lnstrumentation ,l LS s14,280.00
Facility Startup 1 s13,94s.0O
Demobilization 1 LS s3,347.0O
Misc. Work ltems Not lncluded Above 1 s80,718.00
WRRF BRO PUMP STATION UPGRADES
Project 10704.8
page 13 of '13
Exhibit B
MILESTONE DATES/SCHEDULE
s27,61s.0O
s194,863.0O
LS
LS
LS
THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS
Bond# 2254325
AIA Document 4312
Performance Bond
Any singular reference to Contractor, Surety, Owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable
CONTRACTOR (Name and Address)
lrminger Construction, lnc.
25094 Homedale Rd.
Wilder, lD 83676
OWNER (Name and Address):
City of Meridian
Purchasing Department
33 E. Broadway Avenue Suite 106
Meridian. lD 83642
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Date: June 13, 2017
Amount: $802,527.00
Description (Name and Location): Boise River Outfall Pump Station Upgrades
SURETY (Name and Principal Place of Business)
North American Specialty lnsurance Company
650 Elm Street
Manchester, NH 03101
BOND
Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract Date)
Amount: $802,527.00
Modiflcations to this Bond:
June 13, 201 7
X None E See Page 3
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL
Company: (Corporate Seal)(Corporate Seal)
lr*llnge{Consti{ctron North Ame Company
Signature
Name and Titie '7'ra.t L 6.y.t- -,/*f r 4-y'Name and Title: Te S. Rob , Attorney-ln-Fact
(Any additional signatures appear on page 3)
(FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Name, Address and Telephone)
AGENT or BROKER: OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE (Architect, Engineer or
other party):
Post lnsurance
P.O. Box 8447
Boise, lD 83707
n Speci
AIA DOGUMENT A3l2 . PERFORMANCE BOND AND PAYMENT BOND . DECEMBER 1984 Eo ' AtA @
THEAMERICAN INSTITUTE OFARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W, WASHINGTON O,C,20006
THIRO PRINTING . i.{.ARCH 1987
A312-1984 1
YI
Signature:
SURETY
Company:
s",t:::::'--'' "z
-: J-:') :::/'. z: ?
: -.ri
r
: '-,:S i .Y;* i
'. -? '.. ''- :-" -r-
1 The Contractor and the Surety, jointly and severally, bind
themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns to the Owner for the performance
of the Construction Contract, which is incorporated herein
by reference.
2 lf the Contractor performs the Construction Contract, the
Surety and lhe Contractor shall have no obligation under
this Bond, except to participate in conferences as provided
in Subparagraph 3.1.
3 lf there is no Owner Default, the Surety's obligation
under this Bond shall arise after:
3.1 The Owner has notilled the Contractor and the
Surety at its address described in Paragraph 10 below
that the Owner is considering declaring a Contractor
Default and has requested and attempted to arrange a
conference with the Contractor and the Surety to be
held not later than fifteen days after receipt of such
notice to discuss methods of performing the
Construction Contract. lf the Owner, the Contractor
and the Surety agree, the Contractor shall be allowed a
reasonable time to perform the Construction Contract,
but such an agreement shall not waive the Owner's
right, if any, subsequently to declare a Contractor
Defaulti and
3.2 The Owner has declared a Contractor Default and
formally terminated the Contractor's right to complete
the contract. Such Contractor Default shall not be
declared earlier than twenty days after the Contractor
and the Surety have received notice as provided in
Subparagraph 3.1; and
3.3 The Owner has agreed to pay the Balance of the
Contract Price to the Surety in accordance with the
terms of the Construction Conlracl or to a conlraclor
selected to perform the Construction Contract in
accordance with the terms of the contract with the
Owner.
4 When the Owner has satisfied the conditions of
Paragraph 3, the Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's
expense take one of the following actions:
4.1 Arrange for the Contractor, with consent of the
Owner, to perform and complete the Construction
Contract; or
4.2 Undertake to perform and complete the
Construction Contract itself, through its agents or
through independent contractors; or
4.3 Obtain bids or negotiated proposals from qualilied
contractors acceptable to the Owner for a contract for
performance and completion of the Construction
Contracl, arrange for a contract to be prepared for
execution by the Owner and the contractor selected
with the Owner's concurrence, to be secured with
performance and payment bonds executed by a
qualified surety equivalent to the bonds issued on the
Construction Contract, and pay to the Owner the
amount of damages as described in Paragraph 6 in
excess of the Balance of the Contract Price incurred
by the Owner resulting from the Contractois default;
or
4.4 Waive its right to perform and complete, arrange
for completion, or obtain a new contractor and with
reasonable promptness under the circumstances:
.'t After investigation, determine the amount for
which it may be liable to the Owner and, as
soon as praclicable afrer the amount is
determined, tender payment therefore to the
Owner, or
.2 Deny liability in whole or in part and notify the
Owner citing reasons therefore.
5 lf the Surety does not proceed as provided in Paragraph
4 with reasonable promptness, the Surety shall be deemed
to be in default on lhis Bond fifteen days afler receipt of an
additional written notice from lhe Owner to the Surety
demanding that the Surety perform its obligations under
this Bond, and the Owner shall be entitled to enforce any
remedy available to the Owner. lf the surety proceeds as
provided in Subparagraph 4.4, and the Owner refuses the
payment tendered or the Surety has denied liability, in
whole or in part, without further notice the Owner shall be
entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner.
6 After the Owner has terminaled the Contractor's right to
complete the Construction Contract, and if the Surety
elects to act under Subparagraph 4.1, 4.2, or 4.3 above,
then the responsibilities of the Surety to the Owner shall
not be greater than those of the Contractor under the
Construction Contract, and the responsibilities of the
Owner to the Surety shall not be greater than those of the
Owner under the Construction Contract. To the limit of the
amount of this Bond, but subject to commitment by the
Owner of the Balance of the Contract Price to mitigation of
cosls and damages on the Construction Contract, the
Surety is obligated without duplication for:
6.1 The responsibilities of the Contractor for correction
of defective work and completion of the Construction
Contract;
6.2 Additional legal, design professional and delay
costs resulting from the Contractor's Default, and
resulting from the actions or failure to act of the Surety
under Paragraph 4; and
6.3 Liquidated damages, or if not liquidated damages
are specified in the Construction Conlract, actual
damages caused by delayed performance or non-
performance of the Contractor.
7 The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner or others for
obligations of the Contractor that are unrelated to the
Construction Conlract, and the Balance of the Contract
Price shall not be reduced or sel off on account of any
such unrelated obligations. No right of action shall accrue
on this Bond lo any person or entity other than the Owner
or its heirs, executors, adminislrators or successors.
8 The Surety hereby waives notice of any change'
including changes of time, to the Construction Contracl or
to related subcontracts, purchase orders and other
obligations.
9 Any proceeding, legal or equitable, under this Bond may
be instituted in any court of competent jurisdiction in the
location in which the work or part of the work is located and
shall be instituted within two years after Contractor Default
or within two years after the Contractor ceased working or
within two years after lhe Surety refuses or fails to perform
its obligations under this Bond, whichever occurs flrst. lf
the provisions of this Paragraph are void or prohibited by
law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties
as a defense in the jurisdiction of the suit shall be
applicable.
A3't 2-1984 2
il oocuurHr mrz. pERFoRMANoE BoND AND PAYMENT BoNo. oEcEMSER 1984 Eo 'AlA@
THE ATIERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. 1735 NEW YORK AVE,, N,W., WASHINGTON, O C, 20006
THIRD PRINTING. MARCH 1987
1O Notice to lhe Surety, the Owner or the Contractor shall
be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the
signature page.
11 When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a
statutory or other legal requirement in the location where
the construction was to be performed, any provision in this
Bond conflicting with said statutory or legal requirement
shall be deemed deleted herefrom and provisions
conforming to such statutory or other legal requirement
shall be deemed incorporated herein. The intent is that
this Bond shall be construed as a statulory bond and not
as a common law bond.
t2 DEFINITIONS
l2.l Balance ofthe Contract Price: The total amount
payable by the Owner to the Contractor under the
Construction Contract after all proper adjustments
have been made, including allowance to the
Contractor of any amounts received or to be received
by the Owner in settlement of insurance or other
ciaims for damages to which the Contractor is entitled,
reduced by all valid and proper payments made to or
on behalf of the Contractor under the Construction
Contract.
Signaturei
Name and
4-4*--
12.2 Construction Contract: The agreement between
the Owner and the Contractor identifled on the
signature page, including all Contract Documents and
changes thereto.
12.3 Contractor Default: Failure of the Contractor,
which has neither been remedied nor waived, to
pertorm or otheMise to comply with the terms of the
Construction Contract.
12.4 Owner Default: Failure of the Owner, which has
neither been remedied nor waived, lo pay the
Contractor as required by the Construction Conlract or
to perform and complete or comply with the other
terms thereof.
(Corporate Seal)
Signature
MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLOWS
(Space is Drovided belo\.y for additional signatures of added parties, other than those appearing on the cover page.)
(Corporate Seal)
-7-c-
f'ttle. A,,s a-r-- y'./t.-* t Name and Title
Address:Address: 2 to t/ +a..< .-1.. 4 ,(- c
t-,,'/.-/*- Za "36 4
AIA DOCUMENT A3l2 . PERFORMANCE BOND AND PAYMENT BOND . OECEMBER 1984 ED. . AIA O
THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OFARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORX AVE,. N.W, WASHINGTON OC.20006
THIRO PRINTING . IiIARCH 1987
A312-'t984 3
CONTRACIOR AS PRINCIPAL
Compahy:
7r *t. x2; t- (nns /-'r1/ o1
SURETY
Company:
THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS
Bond# 2254325
AIA Document 4312
Payment Bond
BOND
Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract Date)
Amount: $802,527.00
Modifications to this Bond:
SURETY (Name and Pnncipal Place of Business)
North American Specialty lnsurance Company
650 Elm Street
Manchester, NH 03101
OWNER (Name and Address):
City of Meridian
Purchasing Department
33 E. Broadway Avenue Suite 106
Meridian, lD 83642
June 13, 2017
E None X See Page 6
SURETY
Company C orate seal)
lrminge r Construction, lnc N orth enca Spec Company
Signature Signatu
Name and Titl e: -zz.t--.-i C,o2.*- -Z--zr.:,L*Name and Title: Te S. Robb , Attorney-ln-Fact
(Any additional signatures appear on page 6)
(FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Name, Address and Telephone)
AGENT or BROKER: OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE (Architect, Engineer
or other party):
Post lnsurance
P.O. Box 8447
Boise, lD 83707
AIA DOCUMENT A312. PERFORMANCE BONO AND PAYMENT BOND . DECEMBER 1984 ED. . AIA O
THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OFARCHITECTS. 1735 NEW YORKAVE,, N,W., WASHINGTON, O,C. 20006
THIRD PRINTING . i/tARCH 1987
A312-1984 4
u*
Any singular reference to Contractor, Surety, Owner or other pa(y shall be considered plural where applicable.
CONTRACTOR (Name and Address):
lrminger Construction, lnc.
25094 Homedale Rd.
Wilder, lD 83676
(Corporate Seal)
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Date: June 13, 20'17
Amount: $802,527.00
Description (Name and Location): Boise River Outfall Pump Station Upgrades
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL
Coj1p"ny.-
\::
f-- r.,.*\-.-. -- \.\
qtr
I The Contractor and the Surety, jointly and severally, bind
themselves. their heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns to the Owner to pay for labor,
materials and equipment furnished for use in the
performance of the Construction Contract, which is
incorporaled herein by reference.
2 With respect to the Owner, this obligation shall be null
and void if the Conlraclor:
2.1 Promptly makes payment, directly or indirectly, for
all sums due Claimants. and
2.2 Defends, indemnifies and holds harmless the
Owner from claims, demands, liens or suits by any
person or entity whose claim, demand, lien or suit is for
the payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished
for use in the performance of the Construclion Contract,
provided the Owner has promptly notilied the
Contractor and the Surety (at the address described in
Paragraph 12) of any claims, demands, liens or suits
and tendered defense of such claims, demands, liens
or suits to the Contractor and the Surety, and provided
there is no Owner Default.
3 With respect to Claimants, this obligation shall be null
and void if the Contractor promptly makes payment,
directly or indirectly, for all sums due.
4. The Surety shall have no obligation to Claimants under
this Bond until:
4.1 Claimants who are employed by or have a direct
contract with the Contractor have given notice to the
Surety (at the address described in Paragraph 12) and
sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the Owner, stating
that a claim is being made under this Bond and, with
substantial accuracy, the amount of the claim.
4.2 Claimants who do not have a direct contract with
the Contractor:
.'l Have furnished written notice to the Contractor
and sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the
Owner, within 90 days after having last
performed labor or last furnished materials or
equipment included in the claim stating, with
substantial accuracy, the amount of the claim
and the name of the Party to whom the
materials were furnished or supplied or for
whom the labor was done or performed; and
.2 Have eilher received a rejection in whole or in
part from the Contractor, or not received within
30 days of furnishing the above nolice any
communication from the Contractor by which
the Contractor has indicated the claim will be
paid directly or indirectlyi and
.3 Not having been paid within the above 30
days, have sent a written notice to the Surety
(at the address described in Paragraph 12)
and sent a copy, or notice thereof, to the
Owner, stating that a claim is being made
under this Bond and enclosing a copy of the
previous written notice furnished to the
Contractor.
5 lf a notice required by Paragraph 4 is given by the
Owner to the Contractor or to the Surety, that is sufflcient
compliance.
Itl OOCUT'let{t A:t Z . PERFORMANCE BOND ANO PAYMENT BONO ' DECEMBER 1984 EO ' AIA @
THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE,, N.W., WASHINGTON, D'C, 20006
THIRD PRINTING. t,tARCH 1987
A312-1984 5
6 When the Claimant has satisfied the conditions of
Paragraph 4, the Surety shall promptly and at the Surety's
expense take the following actions:
6.t Send an answer to the Claimant, with a copy to the
Owner, within 45 days afrer receipt of the claim, stating
the amounts that are undisputed and the basis for
challenging any amounts that are disputed.
6.2 Pay ot arrange for payment of any undisputed
amounts.
7 The Surety's total obligation shall not exceed the amounl
of this Bond, and the amount of this Bond shall be crediled
for any payments made in good faith by the Surety.
8 Amounts owed by the Owner to the Contractor under the
Construction Contract shall be used for the performance of
the Construction Contract and to satisfy claims, if any, under
any Construction Performance Bond. By the Contractor
furnishing and the Owner accepting this Bond, they agree
that all funds earned by the Contractor in the performance of
the Conslruction Contract are dedicated to satisfy
obligations of the Contractor and the Surety under this
Bond, subject to the Owner's priority to use the funds for the
completion of the work.
9 The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner, Claimants or
others for obligations of the Contractor thal are unrelated to
the Construction Contract. The Owner shall not be liable for
payment of any costs or expenses of any Claimant under
this Bond, and shall have under this Bond no obligations to
make payments to, give notices on behalf of, or otheMise
have obligations to Claimants under this Bond.
l0 The Surety hereby waives notice of any change,
including changes of time, to the Construction Contract or to
related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations.
ll No suit or action shall be commenced by a Claimant
under this Bond other than in a court of competent
jurisdiction in the location in which the work or parl of the
work is located or after the expiration of one year from the
date (1) on which the Claimant gave the notice required by
Subparagraph 4.1 or Clause 4.2.3, ot (2) on which the last
labor or service was performed by anyone or the last
materials or equipment were furnished by anyone under the
Construction Contract, whichever of (1) or (2) first occurs. lf
the provisions of this Paragraph are void or prohibited by
law, the minimum period of limitation available to sureties as
a defense in the jurisdiction of the suit shall be applicable.
12 Notice to the Surety, the Owner or the Contractor shall
be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the
signature page. Actual receipt of notice by Surety, the
Owner or the Contractor, however accomplished' shall be
suflicient compliance as of lhe date received at the address
shown on the signature page.
l3 When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a
statutory or other legal requirement in the location where the
construction was to be performed, any provision in this Bond
conflicting with said slatutory or legal requirements shall be
deemed deleted herefrom and provisions conforming to
such statutory or other legal requirement shall be deemed
incorporated herein. The intent is that this
Bond shall be construed as a statutory bond and not as a
common law bond.
15 DEFINITIONS
15.1 Claimant: An individual or entity having a direct
contracl with the Contractor or with a subcontractor of
the Contractor to furnish labor, materials or equipment
for use in the performance of the Contract. The intent
of this Bond shall be to include without limitation in the
terms 'labor, materials or equipment" that part of
water, gas, power, light, heat, oil, gasoline, telephoneservice or rental equipment used
15,2 Construction Contract: The agreement between
the Owner and the Contractor identified on the
signature page, including all Contract Documents and
changes thereto.
15.3 Owner Default: Failure of the Owner. which has
neither been remedied nor waived, to pay the
Contractor as required by the Construction Contract or
to perform and complete or comply with the other
terms thereof.
MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Paragraph 6 of this Bond is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following provision
CGNIRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL
Company:
/-r,-t. n5 e- /n's,/'.. / o--,
(Corporate Seal)
-c-
a2u - 7r^lS.> /.-, z-Signature
(Corporate Seal)
Signature:
Name and Ti e Name and Title
Address:Address: 2re2/ ,K..ztc-1o Z i./
t-v, /../-t _ z-e ?3a ?L
AtA DOCUMENT A3t2 . PERFORIjANCE BOND ANO PAYMENT BONO . OECEI,,IBER 1984 EO. . AIA @
THEAMERICAN INSTITUTE OFARCHITECTS, 1735NEWYORKAVE,NW WASHINGTON, D.C.20006
THIRD PRINTING . iTARCH 1987
A3l2-1984 6
'14 Upon request by any person or entity appearing to be a
potential beneflciary of this Bond, the Contractor shall
promptly furnish a copy of this Bond or shall permit a copy
to be made.
in the Construction Contract. architeclural and
engineering services required for performance of the
work of the Contractor and the Contractor's
subcontractors. and all other items for which a
mechanic's lien may be asserted in the jurisdiction
where the labor, materials or equipment were
furnished.
When the claimant has satisfied the conditions of Paragraph 4, and has submitted all supporting
documentation and any proof of claim requested by the Surety, the Surety shall, within a reasonable
period of time, but not more than 120 days, notify the Claimant of the amounts that are undisputed and
the basis for challenging any amounts that are disputed, including but not limited to, lack of
substantiating documentation to support the claim as to entitlement or amount, and the Surety shall,
within a reasonable time, but not more than 120 days, payor make arrangements for payment of any
undisputed amount; provided, however, that the failure of the Surety to timely discharge of its obligations
under this paragraph or to dispute or identify any specific defense to all or any part of a claim shall not
be deemed to be an admission of liability by the Surety as to such claim or otherwise constitute a waiver
of the Contractor's or Surety defenses to or right to dispute such claim. Rather, the Claimant shall have
the immediate right, without further notice, to bring suit against Surety to enforce any remedy available
to it under this Bond.
(Space i3 provided below for additional signatures of added parties, other than those appearing on the cover page.)
SURETY
Company:
-s
>-\\
NAS SURETY GROUP
NORTH AMEzuCAN SPECIALry INSURANCE COMPANY
WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPAI.IY
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT Nonh American Specialty Insurance Company, a corporation duly organized and existing under
laws ofthe State ofNew Hampshire, and having its principaloffice in the City ofManchester, New Hampshirc, and Washington Intemational
Insurance Company, a corpomtion organized and existinS under the laws ofthe State ofNew Hampshire and having its principal office in the City of
Schaumburg, Illinois, each does hereby make, constitute and appoint:
TERRY S. ROBB, WILLIAM F. POST,
and MARY JAQUIER
Its true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for and on its behalfand as its act and deed, bonds or other w tings
obligatory in the nature ofa bond on behalfofeach ofsaid Companies, as sure6/, on contracts ofsuretyship as are or may be required or permifted by
law, reSulation, contmct or otherwise, provided that no bond or undenaking or contract or suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed the
amount of: FIFTY MILLION ($50,000,000.00) DOLLARS
This Power of Attomey is granted and is signed by facsimile under and by the authority ofthe following Resolutions adopted by the Boards of
Directors ofboth North American Specialty Insurance Company and Washington Intemational Insurance Company at meetings duly called and held
on lhe 9rh ofMar, 2012:
"RESOLVED, that any two ofthe Presidents, any Managing Director, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Assistant Vice President.
the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary be, and each or any ofthem hereby is authorized to execute a Power of Attomey qualirying the attomey named
in the given Power of Attomey to execute on behalfofthe Company bonds, undertakings and all contracts ofsuety, and that each or any ofthem
hereby is authorized to attesl to the execution ofany such Power of Attomey and to attach therein the sealofthe Company; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the signature ofsuch officers and the seal ofthe Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attomey or to any
certificate .elating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power ofAnorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be
binding upon the Company when so affixed and in the future with regard to any bond, undertaking or contract ofsurety to which il is attached."
B)
Srcvcn P. AndeBor, S.nior Vt. Pr6d.rr ofWrlingron lrr.rnriloul htu.rNcConprry
& S.nior VI.. Prctld.,r otNont ADen..n Sp.clrlry Inrur.m. Comp y
Bv
JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY
& S.oi.r vic t6id l ol Norrh Amri(r Sp..idq lnlu a Coopu,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, North American Specialty Insurance Company and Washington Inremational In
official seals to be hereunto affixed, a]ld these prcsents to be signed by their authorized olficers this 22nd day of
surance Company have caused theirSeplember .2015 .
State of tllinois
County ofCook
M. Kcnny, Norlry Public
SS
I, Jeffrev Goldbere . the duly elected
Intemational lnsurance Company, do he
American Specialty Insurance Company
Assistant Sec ofNorth American S pecialty lnsurance Company and Washington
reby certi& that the above and foregoing is a true and corect copy ofa Power of Attomey given by said North
and Washington Intemational Insurance Company, which is still in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and affixed the seals ofthe Companies this I dayof June .20 17
OFFCIAL SEAT
M (EII{Y
NOTMY PUBI.IC, STAIE OF II1JNOIS
MY @$I SSTOI E)(!lRES 12rc{20r7
,oltGy Goldb.rs. vie P6rdel & Asns.er Sesi.ry oa
W.shlngion I .n.rioral Irs@c. Compey & Nonh An icu Spci.lry Insuruc. Compoy
North Americ.n Specialty Itrsurrnce Comprny
Washington lntern{tional lnsurance Company
On this 22ndday of September . 20-]j- before me, a Notary Public personally appeared Steven P. Anderson , Senior Vice President of
Washington Intemational Insuranc€ Company and Senior Vice President ofNo(h American Specialty Insurance Company and Michael A. Ito.
Senior Vice President ofwashington lnternational Insurance Company and Senio. Vice President ofNorth American Specialty Insurance
Company, personally known to me, who being by me duly swom, acknowledged that they signed the above Power ofAttomey as officersofand
acknowledged said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed oftheir resp€ctive companies.
-UP>
SEAL
-aconif
cERTtF|CATE NUMBER:2017-2018COVERAGES REVISION NUMBER:
DATE (MTVOOryYYY)
6/r / 20L7
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGI,iTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLOER. THIS
CERTIFICATE OOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMENO, EXTENO OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY IHE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZEO
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER. AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: lf the ce.tifi cate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSUREO, the policy(ies) must be endorsed lf SUBROGATION lS WAIVED, sub.i6ct to
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
wilder rD 836? 6
fi!fl}cr arysrria eanUre
iJ3,*'1, .,'), (208) 335-s60o
!ffi !r. agamble!6postins
(rJq.I!)(208)3aa-0651
INSURER
TNSURER
INSURER
INSURER
rNsuRER(S) AFFOROTNG COVERAOE
aAuto Oirnors Ingurance
B:IlLaho qqrt€ Insuranc€ FunL
c:
o:
18988
36129
E LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSUREO NAMED AEOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATEO NOTWTHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO IAI-IICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS
EXCLUSIONS AND CONOITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES LIMITS SHO\^iN I\4AY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANC
BER
POLICY EFF POLICY EXPIYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS
EACH OCCURRENCE $
OAi,iAGE IO RENTEO
PREMISES (Ea occunenc€) I
MED ExP (Any oe p€lson) I
PERSONAL & AOV INJURY , $
GENERAL AGGREGAIE I
PRODUCTS, COMP/OP AGG $
Hned & Non-Owned Labrfty 5
1 , 000 ,000
300,000
10,000
1,000,000
2 .000, 000
2 , 000,000
1 , 000 ,000
14463951753127!7
A
x
tl
3/ t! /2011 3/11. /2OtA
X . COMIIERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
. cT MS,MAOE -l! OCCUR
x 55091, 55373
ALL O\AAIEO
AUTOS
HIREOAUTOS
x 89304
4975372100
I , 000, 000Undeansur6d moloni Al
s
sAx
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
SCHEOULED
AUTOS
NON,OlM{ED
AUTOS
(Ea accidenl)
BODILY INJURY (P€r pe66)
3/lr/2011 3/ll/201,8 BOOILY INJURY (P6raedonD !
PROPERTY DAMAGE(Pd ed6n)
5 , 000 ,009
5, 000 ,00049153127a7A
X UMARELLA IIAB X
EXCESS r-rAA
RETENTION
OCCUR
CLAIMS.MAOE
€ L EACHACCTOENT _$
E L DISEASE. EA EMPTOYEE S
E L DISEASE - POLICY IIMIT I
5t9224 t/t/2at7 1/t/zota
ER
500
500 ,000
500 ,000
oESCRTPTIOi OF OPERATIONS / LOCAITONS / VENIC IES (ACORO 1Ol, Additlon.l R.,nrrt! Sch.dut., m.y b..(..hed ilmorr !p!c. t! r.qulr.d)RE: Boig€ Riwer OutfaII puntr) Station Upgrades
CERTIFICATE HOLOER CANCELLATION
City of Meridian
33 E Broadway AveMelidian, ID A3642
SHOULD ANY OF THEAAOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES AE CANCELLEO SEFORETHE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WLL BE DELIVERED IN
ACCORDANCE WTH THE POLICY PROVISIOT{S.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Alyshia Gamble /AG Aat+ t^z- -
O 1988.2014 ACORO CORPORATTON. A rights reserved.
The ACORO name and logo are registe.ed marks of ACORDACORD 25 (2014/01)
lNSO25 ru orror r sx
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
PROOUCER
Pogt Insuranc6 Serwic6s, Inc.
2717 W. Bannock St.
P. O. Box 8{{7
Boise ID 83707
INSUREO
Irming€r ConsCruction, Inc.
25094 HoDedale Rd
1, 000 , o0o
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPTIES PER'
, eorrcv i x !5& --.o"
EACH OCCURRENCE
3/!!/2017 3/l!/2a\8 AGGR€GArE
5
s
s
WOR(ERS COMPENSATION
ato EIPLoYERS' LtABtLtlY Y/NAN! PqOoFtETOR,pAc_NLR/ExECJTtvE
_ Of.,CEq/VEMBEqL\C-UDED'u (M.ndatory in NHI
llyes doscnbe und€r
DESCRIPIION OF OPERATTONS b6tN
Agency Code 39-0011-00 Policy Number 1 44639 - 577 537 ?7
This endorsomont modlffes insurancs providsd under tho fiollowing
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILtTY COVERAGE FORM,
A. Under SECTION ll - WHO lS AN INSUREO, the
following is added:
A person or organization is an Additional lnsurad,
only wilh respect to liability arising out of'your
work' br that Additional lnsured by or ficr you:
1. lf required in a written contract or agrsement;
or
2. lf requlrod by an oral contract or agreemenl
only if a Certificate of lnsurance was issusd
prior to the loss lndicating that tho person or
organization was an Additional lnsured.
8. Under SECIION lll - LIMITS OF INSURANCE, the
following is added:
The limits ol liability for the Additional lnsured are
those specifed in lh6 wriften conlract or agroe-
ment batween lhe insured and lho owner, lossee
or contractor or lhos6 specifiod in the Corlificato
of lnsurance, if an oral contract or agreemont, nol
to excoed ths limits provided in this policy. These
limits are inclusive of and not in additlon to lho
limils of insurance shown !n the Declarations.
C. SECTION IV . COMMERCIAL GENTRAL LIABILITY
CONDITIONS, is amended as follows:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
s5373 (1{7)
2. The ficllowing provision is added
Other Additional lnsur€d Coverago lssuod By
ts
lf this policy provides coverage br lhe same
loss lo any Additional lnsurod spocifically
shown as an Additional lnsured in another
endorsoment to this policy, our maximum limit
of insurance under this sndorsemonl and any
oth6r endorsement shall not oxcesd tho limit
of insuranco in the written contracl or agreo-
mont botween the insur6d and th6 owner, les-
see or conractor, or ths limits provided in this
policy, whlchever is less. Our maximum limit
of insuranc6 arising out of an 'occurrencs',
shall not exceod the limit of insurance shown
in the Declaralions, ragardless of tho number
of insureds or Additional lnsureds.
All other policy terms and condilions apply
BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED
lncludes copyrighted material of lnsurance Services Oflico, lnc., with its permission
Copyright lnsurance Services Office, lnc., 1984,2003.
1. Ths bllowing provision is added to 4. Otror
lnsurance:
This insurance is primary for ths Additional
lnsured, but ooly with rsspect to liability aris-
ing oul of 'your work' br that Additional ln-
sured by or for you. Other insurance avail-
able to the Additional lnsured will apply as
excess insurance and not conlribute as pri-
mary insurance to tha insurance providsd by
lhis endorssment.
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE REAO IT CAREFULLY,
Page 'l of 1
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4E
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Approval for Finance to Pay Vendor Payments of $1,183,930.17
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund A-1 STAMP & MABEL'S LABELS Upgraded City Seal 17.50
01 General Fund AFLAC T5581, June 2017, AFLAC 3,206.67
01 General Fund AMERICAN MECHANICAL CORP 220/Prev Mtnc HVAC, St. 2 260.00
01 General Fund AMERICAN MECHANICAL CORP 220/Prev Mtnc HVAC, St. 4 260.00
01 General Fund AMERICAN MECHANICAL CORP 220/Prev Mtnc, HVAC, St. 1 195.00
01 General Fund AMERICAN MECHANICAL CORP 220/Prev Mtnc, HVAC, St. 3 195.00
01 General Fund AMERICAN MECHANICAL CORP 220/Prev Mtnc, HVAC, ST. 5 195.00
01 General Fund AMERICAN MECHANICAL CORP 220/Repair A/C St. 2 130.00
01 General Fund AMERICAN MECHANICAL CORP 220/Repair A/C St. 4 90.25
01 General Fund AMERICAN MECHANICAL CORP 220/Repair A/C ST. 5 72.00
01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.17-0050, Streetlight Maintenance, pole 40402C,
5/27/2017
177.00
01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.roof heat tape repairs around drains at Community
Center
2,804.89
01 General Fund BLUE CROSS OF IDAHO June 2017 Blue Cross Insurance 339,207.16
01 General Fund BOISE METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERC Food & Ag Advisory Board Dues-B.Chatterton
7/1/17-6/30/18
400.00
01 General Fund BOISE SOFTBALL UMPIRES ASSOC.17-0253 softball umpire services 5/22-28/17; Summer
Kickoff
7,278.88
01 General Fund BOISE SOFTBALL UMPIRES ASSOC.17-0253 softball umpire services 5/29-6/2/17 - qty 41
games
1,107.41
01 General Fund BOUNDTREE MEDICAL 220/Medical Supplies, gauze pads, tape, gloves, BP unit 405.57
01 General Fund BPA HEALTH, INC.EAP, June 2017, 448 Employees 1,300.32
01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC.220/Truck wash, St. 4 60.00
01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC.220/Truckwash, St. 1 60.00
01 General Fund CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS
CARD SERVICES
#7898226373, Pay City Fuel May 2017 10,139.82
01 General Fund CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS
CARD SERVICES
#7898226399, Pay PD Fuel May 2017 11,992.44
01 General Fund CITY OF BOISE 2017 Contribution for Allumbaugh, July - September
2017
3,503.00
01 General Fund CITY OF BOISE ATTORNEYS OFFICE 17-0013, City Prosecutor/Criminal Legal Services June
2017
29,102.42
01 General Fund CLAYTON TREE FARM Ash & Maple trees for downtown - qty 4 691.00
01 General Fund COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP Exec. Business Membership Renewal,
000111807922078, FY2017
180.00
01 General Fund CTA ARCHITECTS 17-0039 RWT Pathway design service contract - April
2017
3,859.26
01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY 220/St. 4, Credit, plastic weld & rivets - qty 2 (7.08)
01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY repair hitches for trucks 14 & 5 - qty 2 359.98
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 1
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY tie down straps for spray tank 21.99
01 General Fund DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO Delta Dental, June 2017, #0133-0000 23,812.75
01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO part & light bulbs for all park restrooms - qty 31 76.94
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Install Cradlepoint & Update Flashlight Charger Unit #
129
397.28
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Remove Police Equipment to Prepare for Sale,
Unit#147
750.00
01 General Fund ETC INSTITUTE 17-0227, Community Survey Administration 3,225.00
01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Anchors - Qty 53 64.49
01 General Fund FOUR SEASONS SPA & POOL, LLC parts for chlorinator water line for Generations Plaza x
2
24.00
01 General Fund GEM STATE COMMUNICATIONS INC cell phone antenna fitting/adapter for Renaissance
Park x 1
11.53
01 General Fund GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE TRAINING Registration, E. Daniel, 879.C.0.00.000 Wireshark BC
Class,
3,695.00
01 General Fund GRASS ROOTS AGRONOMICS, INC.infield mix for Heritage MS ball fields - qty 30.22 2,314.52
01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY credit on irrigation parts; reference invoice I4505007 (101.21)
01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY mainline tape for Ten Mile - qty 1 23.83
01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY sprinklers for Settlers Park - qty 6 123.72
01 General Fund HALE INDUSTRIES INC 220/Repair ice maker, ST. 3 93.00
01 General Fund HILAREY JOHNSON instructor fee - DemoTeam/TourneyPrep 5/9-5/23/17 x
12
240.00
01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/dryer vent kit for Fire Safety Center 9.99
01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES paint for women's restroom at Homecourt - qty 1 27.48
01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES spray paint for HMS ball field bases & foul poles - qty 7 21.84
01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES tarp, cable ties, tape measure - qty 14 123.70
01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Wasp spray, paint, filters - Qty 9 76.76
01 General Fund HSBC (COSTCO) BUSINESS SERVICE #7003-7319-1000-5018, Costco, May 2017 635.15
01 General Fund IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY 17-0012, Animal Control Services June 2017 30,844.33
01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2200136188, Parks Power May 2017 10,422.47
01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2203586629, Street Lights Power May 2017 26,458.07
01 General Fund IDAHO POWER ID Power - Fire Department 2,002.04
01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Geddes Subdivision 44.40
01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Ord 17-1729 The Oaks South 976.73
01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for PH- 2 1/2 Street townhomes,
Kingsbridge Nor
74.74
01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Re-Zone of Bancroft Square 225.25
01 General Fund IDAHO STATE INSURANCE FUND Workers Comp Claim 201608033 - Final Adjustment 17.52
01 General Fund IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION Sales Tax May 2017 4,758.85
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 2
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund KEVIN FEDRIZZI Per Diem, K. Fedrizzi, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Course, S
288.00
01 General Fund LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Kleiner John Deere 1445 mower rear tire replacements
- qty 2
113.08
01 General Fund LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Settlers John Deere 1445 mower flat tire repair 9.20
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC City #7, #0999, 5/28/17 Statement -1,265.94
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC HR, #3590, 5/28/17 Statement -672.03
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Mayor#2, #8662, 5/28/17 Statement -393.73
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Mayor#3, #8670, 5/28/17 Statement -308.70
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks #2, #3725, 5/28/17 Statement -839.38
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Parks#1, #4525, 5/28/17 Statement -1,785.05
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay City#6, #0945, 5/28/17 Statement 1,469.79
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay City#8, #1005, 5/28/17 Statement 789.24
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay City#9, #1013, 5/28/17 Statement 839.24
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Clerks, #3582, 5/28/17 Statement 1,983.25
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#1, #8712, 5/28/17 Statement 69.71
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#2, #8720, 5/28/17 Statement 2,896.60
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#3, #8738, 5/28/17 Statement 451.28
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#4, #8746, 5/28/17 Statement 2,983.36
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Fire#5, #8753, 5/28/17 Statement 3,507.00
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay IT#11, #0438, 5/28/17 Statement 5,241.34
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#2, #8563, 5/28/17 Statement 3,297.75
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#4, #8589, 5/28/17 Statement 3,413.94
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#5, #8597, 5/28/17 Statement 3,036.09
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#6, #8605, 5/28/17 Statement 115.11
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#7, #8613, 5/28/17 Statement 276.95
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay PD#8, #8621, 5/28/17 Statement 801.32
01 General Fund MERIDIAN CHAMBER of COMMERCE Lunch, G. Milam, Meridian Chamber Luncheon 5/16/17 15.00
01 General Fund MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SVCS 220/Repair SCBA, part of repair under warranty 174.00
01 General Fund NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS NCPERS Group Life Insurance June 2017 688.00
01 General Fund NEW HORIZONS OF AUSTIN 20765 Provisioning SQL Databases 2,975.00
01 General Fund NEW HORIZONS OF AUSTIN VMware vSphere Skills for Operators v6.0 Krystal
Goodman 9-7
1,650.00
01 General Fund NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY New York Life Insurance - June 2017 843.31
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.2017 Paws in the Park event sign lamination - qty 8 14.94
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.220/clips, pads, pencils, paper 50.80
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Binders, dividers, pens, toner, clips 292.25
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Binders, Paper, HDMI Cable, Badge Holder - Qty 13 157.43
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Breakaway lanyards for contractors, pop up post its 21.58
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Calculator Ribbons - Qty 1 Pk 8.85
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 3
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Chalk, Markers, & Dry Erase Board for Dog Fair - Qty 5 23.05
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Correction tape, badge holders 21.57
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Document Covers - Qty 5 Pkg 40.25
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.duster, phone rest, paper, pencils - qty 5 39.28
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Fork, Plastic, 1000ct, White Scissors, Strt, 8, 2 pk, blk 34.12
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Leadership Training Program Training Materials - Qty 4
Pk
55.16
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Office Supplies-paper, highlighters, mousepad for Terri 188.39
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Pilot G2 pens per CR 12.08
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Sorter, Incline, Small Blk 4.29
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Supplies for Leadership Training Retreat 191.87
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.toner, clipboard 95.18
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.USB Cables 27.18
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER super unleaded fuel for Ventrac mower 35.12
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 11 63.02
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for Ventrac mower & fleet truck 14 67.89
01 General Fund PRIMEPAY, LLC.COBRA Monthly Fee May 2017 291.75
01 General Fund PRIMEPAY, LLC.FSA/Debit Card Fee May 2017 855.75
01 General Fund PROBUILD 220/1 4X12 12' board, for training 52.00
01 General Fund PROBUILD 220/12' 2x8, boards, qty 8, joint hangers, for training 92.48
01 General Fund PROBUILD 220/34 1/2in 4X8 sheetrock, training 369.92
01 General Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT #20474979, POSTAGE USE, May 2017 1,326.50
01 General Fund SBI CONTRACTING 2 toilet tissue dispensers and 3 locks 140.00
01 General Fund SIGNS BY TOMORROW new Homecourt logoed scorekeeper table cloths x 4 584.00
01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Storey Bark Park directional signs - qty 6 192.00
01 General Fund SIRENNET.COM 220/Credit for warranty repair on invoice #0213674-IN (546.34)
01 General Fund SIRENNET.COM 220/MF035, red/white Ion LED Light for lightbar 109.87
01 General Fund SIRENNET.COM 220/Warranty repair MF043, Amplifyer Assmbly, See
Credit
546.34
01 General Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY paint for ball fields - qty 144 554.40
01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 220/Office supplies, file folders, laminating pouches 29.05
01 General Fund SYRINGA NETWORKS, LLC 17-0020 Dark Fiber (4 Strands)1,150.00
01 General Fund SYRINGA NETWORKS, LLC Ethernet B/W(100MB) Internet B/W(100MB)800.00
01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP 220/button-up & polos for Admin, qty 22 859.25
01 General Fund TAMMY DEWEERD Mayor Cellphone Reimbursement FY17 - June 2017 100.00
01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Ground Commercial Tracking# 1ZE786060352904340 20.01
01 General Fund TRI STATE ELECTRIC, INC PD Server Room Repair 4/10/17 430.00
01 General Fund TWO OCEAN PRINT 2017 Summer Fun Kickoff Champion shirts - qty 107 642.60
01 General Fund ULTRA TOUCH CAR WASH 220/fuel for small engines 14.25
01 General Fund ULTRA TOUCH CAR WASH Full Detail on K-9 Unit #21 188.95
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 4
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 17-0009, UPRR - South Parking Lot Lease, June 2017 1,692.63
01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001, June 2017 Premiums 13,025.29
01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE United Heritage, Voluntary Insurance, June 2017 4,296.44
01 General Fund USSSOA basketball officiating 5/22-5/26/17 - qty 10 games 525.10
01 General Fund USSSOA volleyball officiating 5/22-5/26/17 - qty 37 games 807.19
01 General Fund VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 17-0126, service to May 15, 2017, Janitorial services 14,861.88
01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.
BELLEVUE
742047228-00001 Parks HPN Modems FY17,
2/2/17-3/1/17
152.86
01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.
BELLEVUE
742047228-00001 Parks HPN Modems FY17,
3/2/17-4/1/17
153.80
01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.
BELLEVUE
742047228-00001 Parks HPN Modems FY17,
4/2/17-5/1/17
153.74
01 General Fund VISION SERVICE PLAN 30 044489 0001, VSP June 2017 4,679.47
01 General Fund WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 17-0111, Kleenex, soap, tp 2,691.57
01 General Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 220/Firefighting foam, 5-five gallon pails per station 2,125.00
01 General Fund WILLAMETTE DENTAL OF IDAHO, INC Willamette Dental Insurance June 2017 5,222.55
01 General Fund WINEGLASS ARTS DEVELOPMENT, INC.17-0271, MAC 2017 Concerts On Broadway Production
Services -
5,000.00
01 General Fund WW GRAINGER, INC 220/Equipment batteries, AA, St. 1 34.08
Total 01 General Fund 637,596.72
07 Impact Fund BRIGHT IDEAS LIGHTING COMPANY check construction cameras at 3 new parks 150.00
07 Impact Fund SYNCB/AMAZON jobsite time lapse construction camera @ Hillsdale Park
x 1
299.00
Total 07 Impact Fund 449.00
20 Grant Fund
governmental
ADA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY Reimbursement CDBG Project, Down Payments,
Assistance Progra
20,000.00
20 Grant Fund
governmental
JUB ENGINEERS 17-0220, CDBG Slum & Blight Assessment, Serv
4/30/17-6/3/17
3,576.00
Total 20 Grant Fund
governmental
23,576.00
55 Capital Projects LCA ARCHITECTS CAD Files of City Hall Construction Plans 2,800.00
Total 55 Capital Projects 2,800.00
60 Enterprise Fund A-1 STAMP & MABEL'S LABELS Name plates for K. Buttars, J. McCloughan, & S. Hulbert 30.00
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 5
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
60 Enterprise Fund AFLAC T5581, June 2017, AFLAC 205.39
60 Enterprise Fund AMANDA CLEVENGER refund 1038 W Crestwood WST paid after closing 60.00
60 Enterprise Fund ANGELA N. HARVEY refund 124 W Bloomington Dr WST title overpaid 26.00
60 Enterprise Fund ANNA K. JACKSON refund 3005 W Santa Clara WST paid after closing 45.53
60 Enterprise Fund ANNA-LISA S. MEDEIROS refund 4755 W Dawson WST paid after closing 35.74
60 Enterprise Fund ANTON STREET, LLC.refund 101 W Anton St WST title overpaid 69.49
60 Enterprise Fund APEX INTEGRATED SECURITY
SOLUTIONS
Labor & materials to repair reader on sw corner of lab
bldg
680.94
60 Enterprise Fund APEX INTEGRATED SECURITY
SOLUTIONS
Wall mount lenel reader 221.00
60 Enterprise Fund APSCO, INC.Solenoid valve for screw sucker 1,164.76
60 Enterprise Fund BASF CORPORATION 17-0120 Zetag-polymer 35,251.92
60 Enterprise Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS Flood Plain annual mailers - qty 2,565 815.98
60 Enterprise Fund BLACKSTEAD BUILDING COMPANY refund 3715 Star Hollow WST paid after closing 27.17
60 Enterprise Fund BLACKSTEAD BUILDING COMPANY refund 6524 Moon Drummer WST paid after closing 12.02
60 Enterprise Fund BLACKSTEAD BUILDING COMPANY refund 6531 Levenham WST cust overpaid 38.16
60 Enterprise Fund BLACKSTEAD BUILDING COMPANY refund 6661 Moon Drummer WST paid after closing 10.09
60 Enterprise Fund BLUE CROSS OF IDAHO June 2017 Blue Cross Insurance 106,940.75
60 Enterprise Fund BOWERS AUTO REPAIR Repair Air Bag Wire Vech Lic# C13154 140.40
60 Enterprise Fund BPA HEALTH, INC.EAP, June 2017, 448 Employees 393.12
60 Enterprise Fund BRAD & SALLY FIFE refund 1530 W Ann Taylor St Bldg K WST paid after
closing
92.29
60 Enterprise Fund BRIAN L. VETTER refund 5471 N Landon Creek Pl WST paid after closing 60.00
60 Enterprise Fund BROWN & CALDWELL 17-0147, WRRF Capacity Exp FY15, services 3/31-4/27
2017
80,909.89
60 Enterprise Fund CECIL E. WAITE refund 05200313-02 1542 E San Pedro Ct title co
overpaid
39.84
60 Enterprise Fund CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC 17-0197 SCADA project assistance & technical support 3,868.34
60 Enterprise Fund CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC 17-0197 SCADA project assistance, software
development &
2,990.69
60 Enterprise Fund CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC 17-0269 SCADA project mgmt, software
development/techno
9,460.20
60 Enterprise Fund CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC 17-0311, WRRF Liquid Stream Capacity Expansion-
Thru 4/28/17
75,683.58
60 Enterprise Fund CULVER COMPANY Seed Bookmarks & Stress Balls for PWW & Other
Public Outrea
784.00
60 Enterprise Fund CURREN TECHNOLOGIES Labor to test VFD breaker at blower 2, post aeration 300.00
60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Equipment 632.90
60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Safety 121.49
60 Enterprise Fund DAVID L. PERRIGO refund 1650 W Joshua Ln WST title overpaid 105.94
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 6
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
60 Enterprise Fund DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO Delta Dental, June 2017, #0133-0000 6,451.17
60 Enterprise Fund DENNIS TELLER Reimbursement, D. Teller, Coffee & Kleenex - Qty 2 83.93
60 Enterprise Fund EDWARD & WENDY GASSAWAY Refund, 2302260803, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1482 N
Midtown St, Custom
846.70
60 Enterprise Fund ETHEL ROSS refund 1553 E Drucker Ln WST title overpaid 86.52
60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Clear silicone 21.81
60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Part to fix seal water flow switches on pumps 1-3,
centrate
9.55
60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Part to fix seal water flow switchs on pumps 1-3,
centrate
1.25
60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Parts to fix seal water flow switches on pumps 1-3,
centrate
39.57
60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Safety glasses 273.96
60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Ball plug for repairing pipes for digester 3 project 15.86
60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Fluoropolymer sampling containers (trace metals
sampling)
2,592.95
60 Enterprise Fund GRANT BELNAP refund 3485 W Birdie Ct WST PM & Renter paid 71.17
60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY COD TNT tubes & Total N TNT tubes 435.90
60 Enterprise Fund HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS Ball plug to repair piping for digester 3 project 189.34
60 Enterprise Fund HEARTLAND TOWNHOMES PROPERTY
MANAGMENT
refund 2350 Titanium Pl Meridian WST cust & title paid 124.11
60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Brass hose shut off 59.88
60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Magnet carabiner hook-45# pull 23.84
60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Well Maintenance & Repair 22.48
60 Enterprise Fund HSBC (COSTCO) BUSINESS SERVICE #7003-7319-1000-5018, Costco, May 2017 200.82
60 Enterprise Fund HYDRO LOGIC INC 15-0106 & 17-0315, Well Monitoring 1/26/17-4/24/17
- Final I
9,017.50
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Labor & materials for work stations for collections bldg 4,457.30
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES parts for work stations for collections bldg plumbing 895.00
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO IRRIGATION PUMPERS ASSOC Dues & License, ID Irrigation Pumpers Assoc Fee, 2017 75.00
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2202131047, Wastewater Plant Power May 2017 41,748.32
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2204228288, Water Power May 2017 27,769.26
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2205167097 WWTP Pwr - Liftstations 3,001.55
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION Sales Tax May 2017 4,960.77
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO STATESMAN 73725910, 13 Week Newspaper Subscription,
6/24/17-9/23/17
226.20
60 Enterprise Fund JEFFREY & LORI PETERSEN refund 854 N Biltmore Ave WST paid after closing 35.74
60 Enterprise Fund JESSE & REBECCA JONES refund 296 E Lake Creek WST paid after closing 85.51
60 Enterprise Fund JUB ENGINEERS 07-0225, Back Cat Trunk Sewer Ph.5, services thru
4/29/2017
7,384.54
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 7
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
60 Enterprise Fund JUB ENGINEERS 17-0011 & 17-0169, Black Cat Trunk Sewer Ph.5,
3/5-4/29 2017
43,263.08
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018 QLPE Svcs 4/1-30/17 Kentucky villas-2 sheets 520.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018 QLPE Svcs-4/1-30/17 Regency Phz II@River
Vly-1 sheet
260.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018, QLPE SVC 4/1-30/17 Jump Time-1 sheet 260.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018, QLPE Svcs 4/17-Knightsbridge Sub 2nd
Rvw-1 sheet
260.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018, QLPE SVCS-4/1-30/17 Gemstone Bldg-1 sheet 260.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018, QLPE Svcs-4/1-30/17 Harmony Hills Astd
Lvg-2 sheets
520.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018, QLPE Svcs-4/1-30/17 Heron Ridge Estates; 1
sheet
260.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018, QLPE Svcs-4/1-30/17 Movado Phase 1; 4
sheets
1,040.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018, QLPE Svcs-4/1-30/17 Movado Phase 2-4
sheets
1,040.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018, QLPE Svcs-4/1-30/17-Hastings Sub#3-3
sheets
780.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018, QLPE Svcs-4/1-30/17-Movado Phase 3-6
sheets
1,560.00
60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018,QLPE Svcs-4/1-30/17 Model Hm Furnshngs
Rvw#2;1 sheet
260.00
60 Enterprise Fund LAWNDALE LLC.refund 618 W Lawndale WST PM & Renter paid 157.80
60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC City #7, #0999, 5/28/17 Statement -1,373.42
60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay Water, #3624, 5/28/17 Statement 204.57
60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC WW, #8548, 5/28/17 Statement -1,272.90
60 Enterprise Fund MATERIALS TESTING & INSPECTION 17-0135,WRRF Capacity Expansion FY15,services
5/1-5/14 2017
4,579.20
60 Enterprise Fund MATTSON DIST CO., INC.Equipment 154.70
60 Enterprise Fund McCALL INDUSTRIAL Female thread union 43.00
60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Cowhide leather gloves-Sizes s, m, l, xl, & 2xl 673.80
60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Replacement air hose for shop 24.34
60 Enterprise Fund MURRAYSMITH INC 16-0144,Sewer Line Rep.Gregory Lift Project, thru
4/30 2017
2,648.50
60 Enterprise Fund NATHAN STEVENS refund APRO154746 5483 Saguaro Hills WST paid
after closing
74.69
60 Enterprise Fund NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS NCPERS Group Life Insurance June 2017 128.00
60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Safety glasses for Murray jones 23.32
60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Silicone for front sign 12.58
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 8
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Sunshades for maintenance truck C9868 27.98
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Badge holders, badge reels - Qty 5 22.21
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Copy paper, tabs, hole punch - Qty 7 40.52
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Credit for tabs - qty 4 (21.16)
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Folders, mouse pads, journal - Qty 5 38.82
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Office Supplies-paper, highlighters, mousepad for Terri 8.57
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Quick clips - Qty 1Pk 6.45
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.RW-CD's 1 case of 25 15.72
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Stickers - Qty 1 4.99
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Tabs - Qty 4 Pks 21.16
60 Enterprise Fund OXARC, INC.17-0046 Sodium hypo chlorite 4,818.28
60 Enterprise Fund PARAMOUNT SUPPLY CO.Packing for shop 283.25
60 Enterprise Fund PARAMOUNT SUPPLY CO.Rebuild kit for ASCO 1/2 in solenoid valve 90.00
60 Enterprise Fund POSTNET Postage & Mailing 525.54
60 Enterprise Fund POSTNET Postage & Mailings 432.08
60 Enterprise Fund PREMIER SIGNS Project 10513 Repaired banners and patchs for yard
signs PWW
129.00
60 Enterprise Fund QUANTUM RESOLVE, INC.Fixed filters in Software - Qty 4 660.00
60 Enterprise Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT #20474979, POSTAGE USE, May 2017 215.62
60 Enterprise Fund REX & SHANNA FLEGEL refund 2045 N Astaire Way WST title overpaid 127.37
60 Enterprise Fund RICH CHANEY refund 448 E Observation WST paid after closing 94.02
60 Enterprise Fund RICOH USA, INC E174M911988 monthly copier lease for May 2017 280.53
60 Enterprise Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY Floor paint for reuse & mechanical bldgs 79.80
60 Enterprise Fund RYAN WARDEN & URSULA RADKE refund 2263 E Chateau Dr WST cust & title overpaid 78.93
60 Enterprise Fund SHAWN & SARAH BIRCH refund 2723 W Divid Creek WST paid after closing 35.74
60 Enterprise Fund SHELLY COOPER refund 1517 E Locust View WST paid after closing 33.74
60 Enterprise Fund SIGNS, ETC Banner for lift station-PW Week Tour 75.00
60 Enterprise Fund SIGNS, ETC Banner for Poop Scoot 75.00
60 Enterprise Fund SIGNS, ETC Well Maintenance & Repair 280.52
60 Enterprise Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL Labor to replace fire sprinkler backflow check valve 468.00
60 Enterprise Fund SLHS SERVICE AREA Record Review for D. Crossley 16.00
60 Enterprise Fund SLHS SERVICE AREA Record Review for D. Mittelstedt 16.00
60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY Moblization & signage for work on Franklin between 324.75
60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC Ball valve, ball check valve w/seals, nipple & chemical 178.37
60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC coupling & nipple 17.00
60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC Parts to fix seal water flow switches on pumps 1-3 33.03
60 Enterprise Fund SPORTSMANS WAREHOUSE Safety 179.99
60 Enterprise Fund STAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC 17-0260, Installation of Lost Rapids PRV, 3/13/17-
Final Inv
1,293.75
60 Enterprise Fund STAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC Labor & materials for Daft 2 repair 2,893.79
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 9
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
60 Enterprise Fund STEVEN & KARLY SMITH refund 08901003-04 4362 N Weston Ave paid after
closing
56.68
60 Enterprise Fund STEVEN & KATHERINE COOK refund 1123 E Azan St WST paid after closing 92.84
60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Key-bak security heavy duty retractable key holder 59.05
60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Refund on short shipping key-bak security heavy duty
key
(11.81)
60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Wallmount PPE glove dispenser 34.49
60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Wooden Hydraulic Machines for Engineering booth
PWW Expo
43.90
60 Enterprise Fund TONY & JOCYLYN HUNT refund 3007 E Shaver Ct WST paid after closing 125.00
60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001, June 2017 Premiums 3,703.22
60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE United Heritage, Voluntary Insurance, June 2017 706.43
60 Enterprise Fund UTILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Seal sleeve (grommet)44.50
60 Enterprise Fund VARSITY FACILITY SERVICES 17-0126, service to May 15, 2017, Janitorial services 1,665.21
60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.
BELLEVUE
272508216-00001 Water/WW Modems FY2017 -
4-24-5/23/2017
10.44
60 Enterprise Fund VISION SERVICE PLAN 30 044489 0001, VSP June 2017 1,451.56
60 Enterprise Fund WASTECORP PUMPS LLC Spare counters for plunger pumps 252.63
60 Enterprise Fund WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION WEF Membership, C. Dolsby, 8/1/17-7/31/18 195.00
60 Enterprise Fund WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION WEF Membership, E. Skoro, 9/1/17-8/31/18 195.00
60 Enterprise Fund WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION WEF Membership, G. Nelsen, 9/1/17-8/31/18 195.00
60 Enterprise Fund WILLAMETTE DENTAL OF IDAHO, INC Willamette Dental Insurance June 2017 2,507.55
60 Enterprise Fund WILLIAM ALLEN refund 2006 W Sunny Slope WST paid after closing 37.97
60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Pressure gauge 31.80
60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Water Testing 132.61
Total 60 Enterprise Fund 519,508.45
Report Total 1,183,930.17
Date: 6/8/17 01:27:10 PM Page: 10
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: Hastings Subdivision No. 3
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order for Hastings Subdivision No. 3
(H-2017-0032) by Encore Development, LLC Located 2100 & 2160 W. Everest Lane
MEETING NOTES
Cif APPRONF-0
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0032 - 1 -
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of the Request for a Modification to the Development Agreement to Remove the
Number of Office Buildings that Can be Constructed within the Development; and a Combined
Preliminary and Final Plat Consisting of Eleven (11) Building Lots on 3.48 Acres of Land in the L-
O Zoning District, by Encore Development, LLC.
Case No(s). H-2017-0032
For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 6, 2017 (Findings on June 13, 2017)
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by
reference)
2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by
reference)
3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017,
incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing
date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at
Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by
ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A.
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose
expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be
signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the
Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party
requesting notice.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0032 - 2 -
7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of June 6, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be
reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the
application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon
the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that:
1. The applicant’s request for a modification to the development agreement; and a combined
preliminary and final plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report
for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, attached as Exhibit A.
D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits
Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration
Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or
short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature
on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined
preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A).
In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an
orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat,
such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for
final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B).
Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord
with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City
Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up
to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all
extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined
preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City
Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time
extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11-
6B-7C).
Notice of Development Agreement Duration
The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a
development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development
agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or
rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request.
A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development
agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in
accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the
property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the
modification.
A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0032 - 3 -
agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement
to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval
period.
E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development
application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in
writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the
final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will
toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian.
When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person
who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the
governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order
seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the /3 day of
2017.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD
COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON
COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS
COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER
COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER
COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
(TIE BREAKER)
Mayor Tammy
Attest:
m
y Cd4s r '9 ��yy �o-
City Clerk
VOTED Yf4
VOTED Y4
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED
VOTED 44
VOTED `"
Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City
Attorney.
By: C , �1 - y Co Z&� Dated: I (� "/V( /
City Clerk's Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0032 - 4 -
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT
HEARING DATE: June 6, 2017
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner
208-884-5533
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
208-887-2211
SUBJECT: Hastings Subdivision No. 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032)
I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant, Encore Development, LLC, has submitted an application for a combined preliminary
and final plat (PFP) consisting of 11 building lots on 3.48 acres of land in the L-O zoning district.
A modification to the existing development agreement (MDA) is also requested to remove the
number of office buildings that can be constructed within the development.
II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed PFP and MDA applications based on the Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit C of this report. The MDA does not require action from the
Planning & Zoning Commission, only City Council.
The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard the PFP application on May 4, 2017. At
the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject PFP request.
a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Kelly Kehrer, KM Engineering (Applicant’s Representative)
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: Tom Mannschreck, Robin Findl
iv. Written testimony: Cheryl Walston, Josh & Sara Liddell, Thomas Mannschreck, and
Tom Rudd.
v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen
vi. Other staff commenting on application: None
b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony:
i. Existing access, parking and high traffic volume in this area via Everest Lane, a private
street.
c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission:
i. Ownership of Everest Lane and possible solutions to traffic and parking issues (not
created by this developer).
d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
i. Add a DA provision requiring the property owner to install “No Parking” signs along
Everest Lane and paint the curb red signifying “no parking” adjacent to his property.
e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. None
The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 6, 2017. At the public hearing, the
Council approved the subject MDA and PFP requests.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 2
a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Kelly Kehrer
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: Tom Mannschreck, Tom Rudd
iv. Written testimony: Tina Gosney
v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen
vi. Other staff commenting on application: None
b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony:
i. Adequate parking for the proposed development should be provided on-site so that it
doesn’t contribute to the parking problem along Everest Lane.
c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council:
i. High volume of traffic in this area and parking along Everest Lane, a private street
(current issue not created by this developer).
d. Key Council Changes to Staff/Commission Recommendation
i. None
III. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-
0032, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 6, 2017, with the following
modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0032,
as presented during the hearing on June 6, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific
reasons for denial.)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0032 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date
here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
A. Site Address/Location:
The site is located at 2100 & 2160 W. Everest Lane, in the NE ¼ of Section 26, Township 4
North, Range 1 West. (Parcel No’s. R5299430890 & R5299430880)
B. Applicant:
Encore Development, LLC
63 W. Riverbridge
Eagle, ID 83616
C. Owner:
Same as Applicant
D. Representative:
Kelly Kehrer, KM Engineering, LLP
9233 W. State Street
Boise, ID 83713
E. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 3
V. PROCESS FACTS
A. The subject application is for a combined preliminary & final plat and a development agreement
modification. A public hearing is required before the Planning & Zoning Commission and City
Council on the combined preliminary and final plat; and a public hearing is required only before
the City Council on the development agreement modification, consistent with Meridian City
Code Title 11, Chapter 5.
B. Newspaper notifications published on: April 14, 2017 (Commission); May 19, 2017 (City
Council)
C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: April 6, 2017 (Commission); May 11,
2017 (City Council)
D. Applicant posted notice on site(s) on: April 21, 2017 (Commission); May 24, 2017 (City Council)
VI. LAND USE
A. Existing Land Use(s): The site consists of two undeveloped vacant lots, zoned L-O.
B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
North: W. Chinden Blvd. and a golf course with single-family residences, zoned R-8
South: W. Everest Ln. (private street) and single-family residences, zoned R-4
East: School, zoned L-O
West: Daycare and offices, zoned L-O
C. History of Previous Actions:
• In 2002, the larger Lochsa Falls development received the following approvals:
Annexation and zoning (AZ-02-010) with a development agreement recorded as
Instrument No. 103012598 and an addendum recorded as Instrument No. 104033484;
Preliminary plat (PP-02-009) for Lochsa Falls Subdivision;
Conditional use permit (CUP-02-012) for a planned development in an R-4 zoning
district; and,
• In 2004, a final plat (FP-04-054) was approved for Lochsa Falls No. 12, which included the
subject property as Lots 44 and 45, Block 49.
• In 2007, a rezone (RZ-06-008) was approved from R-4 to L-O; and a modification to the
conditional use permit/planned development (MCU-06-002) was approved to remove the
detailed conditional use permit approval on Lots 41-45, Block 49, Lochsa Falls Subdivision
No. 12.
C. Utilities:
1. Location of sewer: The city currently owns and maintains sewer mains directly adjacent to
the proposed development.
2. Location of water: The city currently owns and maintains water mains directly adjacent to
the proposed development.
3. Issues or concerns: The applicant shall be responsible for the installation of additional water
and sewer mains and services to the project.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 4
D. Physical Features:
1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: There are not any open waterways on this site.
2. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards that exist on this site.
3. Flood Plain: This site does not lie within the floodplain overlay district.
VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designates this site as Mixed Use –
Community (MU-C). The purpose of the MU-C designation is to allocate areas where community-
service uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent of the MU-C
designation is to integrate a variety of uses, including residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and
strip commercial type buildings. Development should comply with the general guidelines for
development in all mixed use areas and have a mix of at least 3 land use types. Residential uses
should comprise a minimum of 20% of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 15
units/acre. See pages 27-28 in the Comprehensive Plan for more information.
The applicant proposes to develop this 3.48 acre site with office and commercial uses, consistent with
the MU-C designation.
Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to
the proposed use (staff analysis in italics):
• “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time
of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F)
City services are available and will be extended by the developer to the proposed lots upon
development of the site in accord with UDC 11-3A-21.
• “Require all commercial and industrial businesses to install and maintain landscaping.”
(2.01.03B)
Parking lot landscaping is required to be provided with development of this property.
• “Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent
parcels.” (3.06.01F)
The future commercial/office development of this property should be compatible with existing
residential properties to the south which are separated by a private street and a landscape
buffer.
For the above reasons, staff believes the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
VIII. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
A. Purpose Statement of Zone: Per UDC 11-2B-1, the purpose of the commercial districts is to
provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan. Six districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial
structures accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the
location of the district in proximity to streets and highways. Allowed uses in the L-O district
consist of office uses and adaptive re-use of residential structures with limited hours of operation
B. Schedule of Use: Unified Development Code (UDC) Table 11-2B-2 lists the permitted,
accessory, conditional, and prohibited uses in the L-O zoning district. No specific uses are
proposed at this time.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 5
C. Dimensional Standards: The dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the L-O
zoning district apply to development of this site.
D. Landscaping: Street buffer and parking lot landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the
standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3, UDC 11-3B-7C and UDC 11-3B-8C for the L-O zoning
district.
E. Off-Street Parking: Off-street parking is required in accord with UDC 11-3C-6B for non-
residential uses.
F. Structure and Site Design Standards: Development of this site must comply with the design
standards in accord with UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines listed in the Architectural Standards
Manual.
IX. ANALYSIS
A. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation:
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MODIFICATION (MDA): The existing development agreement
(DA) (Instrument No. 103012598) restricts the number of office buildings within the Lochsa Falls
development to a maximum of 11. A modification to the DA is requested to remove that
restriction in its entirety (see Exhibit 5).
Because office uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for this site, allowed in the L-O
zoning district, and a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review is required for the
proposed structures and site design, staff is amenable to the applicant’s requested modification.
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT (PFP): A combined preliminary and final plat is proposed consisting
of 11 building lots on 3.48 acres of land in the L-O zoning district for Hastings Subdivision No. 3
(see Exhibits A.2 and A.3). This is a re-subdivision of Lots 44 and 45, Block 49, Lochsa Falls
Subdivision No. 12.
Dimensional Standards: Staff has reviewed the proposed plat for compliance with the
dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the L-O zoning district and found the plat
in compliance with those standards. Future construction on these lots shall be consistent with
these standards.
Access: Access to streets should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-3. Access will
be provided to the proposed lots via W. Everest Lane, a private street. The lots to the east and
west did not provide for cross-access to this property; therefore, none is required with this
development.
Landscaping: A 10-foot wide street buffer is required to be provided along W. Everest Lane, a
private street, as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3; the buffer should be on a common lot or on
a permanent dedicated buffer depicted on the plat. Landscaping within the street buffer should
be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. The landscaping shown on the
landscape plan complies with these standards (see Exhibit A.4).
Fencing: No fencing is depicted on the landscape plan for this site. Fencing exists along the
north, east and south perimeter boundaries of this site. All new fencing should comply with the
standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7.
Sidewalks: Sidewalks are required to be provided with development in accord with the standards
listed in UDC 11-3A-17. A 5-foot wide attached sidewalk is required to be constructed along W.
Everest Lane as depicted on the landscape plan.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 6
Utilities: All development is required to connect to the City water and sewer system unless
otherwise approved by the City Engineer in accord with UDC 11-3A-21.
Pressurized Irrigation: An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be provided
for the development in accord with UDC 11-3A-15 as proposed.
Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord
with the City’s adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances, per UDC 11-3A-18.
Certificate of Zoning Compliance: The applicant is required to obtain approval of a Certificate
of Zoning Compliance application prior to construction to ensure all construction and site
improvements comply with the conditions in this report and the provisions of the UDC, per UDC
11-5B-1.
Design Review: The applicant is required to submit an application for Design Review concurrent
with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application in accord with UDC 11-5B-8. The site
layout and design of all structures on the site is required to be consistent with the design standards
listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and in the Architectural Standards Manual.
Staff recommends approval of the subject applications with the conditions listed in Exhibit B per
the Findings in Exhibit D.
X. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings
1. Vicinity/Zoning Map
2. Preliminary Plat (dated: 3/13/2017)
3. Final Plat (dated: 3/13/2017)
4. Landscape Plan (date: 3/1/17)
5. Proposed Modification to Development Agreement
B. Agency Comments/Conditions of Approval
1. Planning Division
2. Public Works Department
3. Fire Department
4. Police Department
5. Republic Services
6. Ada County Highway District
7. Parks Department
C. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 7
Exhibit A.1: Vicinity/Zoning Map
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 8
Exhibit A.2: Preliminary Plat (dated: 3/13/2017)
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 9
Exhibit A.3: Final Plat (dated: 3/13/17)
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 10
Exhibit A.4: Landscape Plan (dated: 3/1/2017)
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 11
5. Proposed Modification to Development Agreement
(Proposed modification is shown in strike-out format)
Excerpt from Development Agreement (Instrument No. 103012598):
“4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT:
4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under “City’s”
Zoning Ordinance codified at Meridian City Code Section 11-7-2(C) which are herein
specified as follows:
Construction and development of 856 single-family dwellings, 171 multiple family dwellings,
11 office buildings, 1 commercial building, 1 city park, 1 private park, and 1 future fire
station lot, consistent with the Preliminary Plat and Conditional use Permit.
Development shall be consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land
Use Map which designates the property as Single-Family Residential, and go through the
planned development process and as conditional uses.
4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of
this Agreement.”
The Commission requested the following provision is added to the amended Development
Agreement:
“The property owner of Hastings Subdivision No. 3 shall install “No Parking” signs along
Everest Lane and paint the curb red signifying “no parking” adjacent to the property.”
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 12
B. Agency Comments/Conditions
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1.1.1 Development of the site shall substantially comply with the preliminary and final plat included in
Exhibit A, the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and in the Architectural Standards
Manual, and the conditions in this report.
1.1.2 The preliminary plat included in Exhibit A.2, dated 3/13/2017, shall be revised as follows:
a. A 10-foot wide street buffer is required to be provided along W. Everest Lane, a private
street, as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3; the buffer should be on a common lot or on a
permanent dedicated buffer depicted on the plat.
1.1.3 The final plat included in Exhibit A.3, dated April 1, 2015, shall be revised as follows:
a. 10-foot wide street buffer is required to be provided along W. Everest Lane, a private street,
as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3; the buffer should be on a common lot or on a permanent
dedicated buffer depicted on the plat.
1.1.4 The landscape plan included in Exhibit A.4, dated April 6, 2015, is approved as submitted.
1.2 General Conditions of Approval
1.2.1 Comply with all bulk, use, and development standards of the L-O zoning district listed in UDC
Chapter 2 District regulations.
1.2.2 Comply with the provisions for irrigation ditches, laterals, canals and/or drainage courses, as set
forth in UDC 11-3A-6.
1.2.3 Install lighting consistent with the provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11.
1.2.4 Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-
15, UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28.
1.2.5 Comply with the sidewalk standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17.
1.2.6 Install all utilities consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-21 and 11-3B-5J.
1.2.7 Construct all off-street parking areas consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5I,
11-3B-8C, and Chapter 3 Article C.
1.2.8 Construct the required landscape buffers consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-
7C (streets).
1.2.9 Construct storm water integration facilities that meet the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-
11C.
1.2.10 Protect any existing trees on the subject property that are greater than four-inch caliper and/or
mitigate for the loss of such trees as set forth in UDC 11-3B-10.
1.2.11 Provide bicycle parking spaces as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6G consistent with the design
standards as set forth in UDC 11-3C-5C.
1.2.12 Comply with the outdoor service and equipment area standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-12.
1.2.13 Construct all required landscape areas used for storm water integration consistent with the
standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-11C.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 13
1.2.14 Comply with the structure and site design standards, as set forth in UDC 11-3A-19 and the
guidelines set forth in the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual.
1.2.15 Comply with all provisions of UDC 11-3A-3 with regard to maintaining the clear vision triangle.
1.2.16 Low pressure sodium lighting shall be prohibited as an exterior lighting source on the site.
1.2.17 All fencing constructed on the site shall comply with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7
and 11-3A-6B as applicable.
1.2.18 100 Watt and 250 Watt, high-pressure sodium street lights shall be required on all public
roadways per the City of Meridian Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. All street lights
shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the
development plan set for approval. Applicant shall also include the location of any existing street
lights in the development plan set. Street lighting is required at intersections, corners, cul-de-sacs,
and at a spacing that does not exceed that outlined in the Standards. The contractor’s work and
materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to
the ISPWC.
1.3 Ongoing Conditions of Approval
1.3.1 The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a
minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the
area.
1.3.2 The project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances and previous conditions of
approval associated with this site.
1.4 Process Conditions of Approval
1.4.1 No signs are approved with this application. Prior to installing any signs on the property, the
applicant shall submit a sign permit application consistent with the standards in UDC Chapter 3
Article D and receive approval for such signs.
1.4.2 The applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and
Design Review application for all future structures proposed on the site from the Planning
Division, prior to submittal of any building permit applications.
1.4.3 The applicant shall complete all improvements related to public life, safety, and health as set forth
in UDC 11-5C-3B. A surety agreement may be accepted for other improvements in accord with
UDC 11-5C-3C.
1.4.4 The preliminary plat approval shall be null and void if the applicant fails to either 1) obtain the
City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years of the approval of this combined
preliminary/final plat; or 2) gain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7.
1.4.5 The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat within two years of the
approval of this combined preliminary/final plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7A.
1.4.6 The final plat, and any phase thereof, shall substantially comply with the approved preliminary
plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C2.
1.4.7 The property owner shall sign the amended development agreement and return such to the City
within 6 months of the Council granting this development agreement modification request as set
forth in UDC 11-5B-3D2; or, prior to submittal of the Certificate of Zoning Compliance
application(s) for the 11th office building in the overall Lochsa Falls development.
1.4.8 The applicant shall pay any applicable impact fees prior to the issuance of a building permit.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 14
2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval
2.1.1 The applicant shall be responsible for the installation of additional water and sewer mains and
services to the subject development.
2.2 General Conditions of Approval
2.2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works
Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide
service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover
from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in
conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications.
2.2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water
mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement
agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5.
2.2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of
way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a
single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but
rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The
easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed
easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked
EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for
review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO
NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be
submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer.
2.2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water (MCC 9-2-28C1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or
well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point
connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,
the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to
prior to receiving development plan approval.
2.2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat
by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and
possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC.
2.2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC
11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any
other applicable law or regulation.
2.2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per
City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at
(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic
purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources
Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190.
2.2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and
inspections (208)375-5211.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 15
2.2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,
road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision
shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits.
2.2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted
fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat.
2.2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy
of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety
for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in
UDC 11-5C-3B.
2.2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan
approval letter.
2.2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
2.2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
2.2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
2.2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B.
2.2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
2.2.18 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of
3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom
elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above.
2.2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage
facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD.
The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance
with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of
occupancy is issued for any structures within the project.
2.2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per
the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved
prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project.
2.2.21 Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street
Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be
installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan
set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s
work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental
Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility
Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting.
2.2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount
of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure
prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by
the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash
deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the
Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for
more information at 887-2211.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 16
2.2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of
20% of the total construction cost for all completed public sewer, water and reuse infrastructure
for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the
owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash
deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the
Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for
more information at 887-221.
3. FIRE DEPARTMENT
3.1 The Fire Department has no comment on this application.
4. POLICE DEPARTMENT
4.1 The Police Department has no comment on this application.
5. REPUBLIC SERVICES
5.1 No comments were received from Republic Services on this application.
6. PARKS DEPARTMENT
6.1 The Park’s Department has no comment on this application.
7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
The Ada County Highway District has reviewed the submitted application and has determined that
there are no improvements required to the adjacent street(s). The proposed plat is approved without
conditions.
EXHIBIT A
Hastings Sub 3 – PFP, MDA (H-2017-0032) PAGE 17
C. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
1. PRELIMINARY PLAT:
In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the
decision-making body shall make the following findings:
a. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan;
The City Council finds that the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, transportation, and circulation. Please see
Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section VII, of the Staff Report for more
information.
b. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to
accommodate the proposed development;
The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property upon
development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service
providers.)
c. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the
City’s capital improvement program;
Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the developer at
their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of
capital improvement funds.
d. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Based on comments provided by public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc.), the
City Council finds there is financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development. (See Exhibit B for more detail.)
e. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare;
and
The City Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated
with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis.
f. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features.
The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that
exist on this site.
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6A
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: Solid Waste Advisory Commission
Solid Waste Advisory Commission: Trash or Treasure Follow Up Report
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7A
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Community Development: Introduction of the Proposed Draft of the Uniform Street
Name and Address Number Code
MEETING NOTES
l
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7B
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Community Development: Attachment of Sidewalk Barriers Downtown
MEETING NOTES
Z"�
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
DRAFT
UPDATING USE ZONE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR BARRIERS PAGE 1 OF 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. ________________
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS,
MILAM, PALMER
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(C)(1), ALLOWING
SPECIFICATION OF EXCPETIONS TO GENERAL USE ZONE AMENITIES STANDARDS;
AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(D)(3), ALLOWING BARRIERS TO
BE AFFIXED TO SIDEWALKS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Meridian’s Use Zone Encroachment Permit provides a process by
which the City regulates the size, placement, operation, and maintenance of structures and objects
placed in the Use Zone of the sidewalks in the downtown Meridian area, in accordance with the terms
and provisions of its August 7, 2012 license agreement with Ada County Highway District; and
WHEREAS , the changes to Meridian City Code set forth herein are intended to improve the
processes and standards established for barriers delineating outdoor alcohol service areas and dining
areas;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO:
Section 1. That Meridian City Code section 8-1-3(C)(1) is hereby amended to read as follows.
C. General Use Zone Standards: The following standards shall apply to encroachments in the use zone,
and/or to the placement thereof:
1. Amenities Movable: Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this chapter:
a. All amenities placed in the use zone shall be nonpermanent, movable, and freestanding.
b. Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this chapter, amenities Amenities may not be
secured or fastened to streetscape improvements, buildings, or the sidewalk. It shall be unlawful for
any person to permanently attach or affix any amenity in the use zone.
Section 2. That Meridian City Code section 8-1-3(D)(3) is hereby amended to read as follows.
D. Use Zone Amenities Allowed With Encroachment Permit: The following amenities may be allowed
in the use zone under a valid city of Meridian use zone encroachment permit and subject to all
applicable standards as set forth herein:
* * *
3. Barriers that are used to delineate outdoor dining areas or alcohol service areas, so long as
such barriers meet all of the following standards:
a. Barriers shall be comprised of black, wrought iron, sectional fencing, between thirty
six (36) and forty eight inches (48") in height.
b. Barriers shall accommodate access by disabled persons as required by law.
c. Barriers shall not impede, or encroach into the path of, any points of building ingress
or egress.
DRAFT
UPDATING USE ZONE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR BARRIERS PAGE 2 OF 3
d. Nonterminal section breaks of barriers shall be connected, unless incorporating
planters or other container landscaping as set forth above.
e. With specific approval by the Director, barriers may be permanently attached or
affixed to streetscape improvements, buildings, or the sidewalk in the use zone. The
Director may specify, as conditions of such approval:
(1) The manner by which the barriers may be attached to the streetscape improvements,
buildings, or the sidewalk in the use zone;
(2) A requirement that the applicant repair or replace the sidewalk following removal of
the barriers; and/or
(3) A requirement that the applicant provide a warranty surety, with the City as the
named beneficiary, in an amount equal to the estimated cost of replacing the sidewalk
segments in which the barriers are installed, which warranty surety shall be in effect for
one (1) year following the installation of the Encroachment Permit.
(4) Any other conditions deemed necessary or appropriate to protect public safety,
welfare, or interest.
Section 3. That this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, on April ____, 2017.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, on April ____, 2017.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
______________________________ ______________________________
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor C.Jay Coles, City Clerk
DRAFT
UPDATING USE ZONE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR BARRIERS PAGE 3 OF 3
NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A)
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17-_______
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(C)(1), ALLOWING
SPECIFICATION OF EXCPETIONS TO GENERAL USE ZONE AMENITIES STANDARDS;
AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 8-1-3(D)(3), ALLOWING BARRIERS TO
BE AFFIXED TO SIDEWALKS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
__________________________________________
City of Meridian
Mayor and City Council
By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk
First Reading: _________________
Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to
Idaho Code § 50-902: YES_______ NO_______
Second Reading: ________________
Third Reading: _________________
STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO
ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 17- _________
The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies
that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance no. 16-
_______ of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides
adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A(3).
DATED this ______ day of __________________, 2017.
____________________________________
William. L.M. Nary
City Attorney
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7C
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY2017 in the Amount of $1,050,000.00 for JC
Constructors' Contract for the WRRF Capacity Expansion Construction Project
MEETING NOTES
u✓ APPROIED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
'o
a
° ca
00
CL Q
v v
H
o o
v°
Ir
u
� 0
c ~
U
l
^,4A
C
z z°
u^
bD
C
Qo
CJD
rn
3
o
`°
A
�
a
L°
w
N
•NK
� a
a
o
� O
ti
N
>3�
°
O
W
V
a
❑❑
�-
U
U
O
N
N
_
a
L
"'O
'o
a
1,
0
a
0
° ca
00
CL Q
v v
c
o o
v°
h0
u
� 0
c ~
U
l
N
v
C
z z°
F
bD
C
Qo
CJD
3
o
`°
A
m
o
_
L°
0
c
•NK
i
a
o
LD
ti
>3�
°
E
E
M
a
❑❑
�-
U
U
_
L
"'O
-O
"o
U d
u U
d U
O.
d.
F
a
7 U
N
LLO
w
a�
0
E
N
bD
O N
y
ci
ci
C
00
d E O
0
in
a 0
m
0
O
0
w
�
0
O
a
0
0
N
o
�
(O
� N
J
0
0
0 0
LL
0
o
E E
r
�7
3
m
z z
O
N
O
N
z
o
N
O
N
O
E
N
O
U
Y
c C
N
Q.
N
d'
N
d*
N
V
N
d'
U/
N
o
t t
N
N
N
0!
O.
fl
Q
Q
1,
0
a
0
° ca
00
CL Q
v v
c
o o
v°
h0
u
� 0
c ~
U
l
N
v
C
7- hO
F
1,
0
a
0
0
00
0
0
0
N
'^
O
U
l
0
C
U
C
bD
C
c
C
3
n
E
o
_
O
c
a
cQ
a
o
LD
ti
Q
°
E
E
M
a
v
o
N
N
_
b
ani
"o
Q
cc
o
a
F
a
>
O
c
O
U
u.
w
a�
0
E
w
ci
0
ei
ci
ci
ci
ci
0
in
a 0
m
0
O
0
w
0
O
0
O
0
0io
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
O
w
O
r
-+
N
m
'n
O
N
O
N
Iq
N
O
m
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
e -i
N
N
N
d'
N
d*
N
V
N
d'
U/
N
N
v
N
N
N
0!
O.
fl
Q
Q
Q
d
Y
i+
Q
i�
C
:E
:E
2
2
2
:E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
tD(D(D
tD
O
w
1,
0
a
0
0
00
0
0
0
N
'^
O
l
0
C
C
C
C
m
a
a
o
LD
M
N
N
N
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
o
0
0
0
0
o
0
O
o
ui
0
00
m
�
v
�
v
(D
N
LD
N
C
Ul
�
N
3
E
�
N
U
�
f0
Q
N
O
O
@
�
N
v
v
O
v
ai
W
W
d
Z
c
J
.
CL
N
oz
U
U
co
n:
'n
,-'
ci
ci
ci
O
C)
LD
O
0
LO(
O
0
(D
O
0
l0
O
0
l0
o
0
l0
0
l0
C)
0
l0
0
l0
0
0
LD
0
0
0
0
0
a 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
My
'Nn
o
�
W
In
in
Qi
dl
Q1
Ul
Q
—
—
—
O
O)
o)
-4(3)
Y
Y
Y
t
m
m
m
m
m
2:E
2:�E
�5;
5;
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
w
LO
LO�o
LD
w
w
ZI
}„ o
O
00
z
3'
a
z
z z
0
N
'^
O
l
1
O
ro
u:
3
a
w
w
C
E
m
C
O
H
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7D
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: Public Works
Budget Amendment for FY 2017 in the Amount of $60,316 for Repair of Sewer
Infrastructure
MEETING NOTES
Ff APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
O
a m
-�-+
V
6
IR 4)-.c,
v
"
z z
U
aQi
O
O
O
O
U
C
i,
i�
� C
n
oa
�_f
A :-
O'
"
M
,
N
"
d
C�
C
�o
N
�
Q
c
O
N
c
_
~ O
Q
H
U
X
3
o
'a
O)
❑❑
v
`,.�
w
'c _
-Q
-c
�
�
u
�•
O
OO
N
d
d'
o
nom.
U
E
E
F>
d
�//E�
c
cuN
F7
W
O
E
O
O
v) o
m w
0
O
0
0
0
o
O
O
m a
w
E 0
d'
O
-i
N
N
N
o
w
N
N
N
Q
I
N
r-1
C y
O
N
W
a'
i
al a/
D
LL
J
O
�
U
Z
O�
m co
/-�
z z
m
n v
z
O
O
O
C
C
O
E
N
L-�
O
N
N
`- d
3
E E
N
U-
D
W
v
Ott
N
a
G
ai
4� :#
tq0
co
O
a m
-�-+
V
6
IR 4)-.c,
v
"
U
aQi
O
O
O
O
U
C
i,
i�
� C
n
oa
O'
"
m
U,
h
N
"
d
C�
C
�
N
�
Q
c
O
N
c
_
~ O
Q
U
Q1
aoC
o
'a
O)
"
v
v
�
o
y
vo
O
OO
N
MO
W
�I
o
E
E
F>
d
O
c
U
W
inG
£
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
o
O
O
to
O
O
c-1
d'
O
-i
N
N
N
M
N
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
r-1
W
O
N
O
N
O
N
�
L~ILL
�
U
N
O
O
O
O
C
C
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
cN
D
W
M
M
N
a
G
ai
c
O
m
M 0
O
Ea
0
0
n
0
7
U
N
LD
U
.�•-�
LL
V
a1
al
U
m
a)
0
o
J
CL
4� :#
tq0
co
O
N.
V
6
"
U
O
O
O
O
U
C
i,
i�
�
n
oa
O'
Ln
m
U,
h
N
I,
o
c
O
a)
Q
U
Q1
o
"
v
v
�
o
y
vo
O
OO
N
e
�I
o
Ln
F>
d
O
c
U
W
inG
£
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
to
O
O
c-1
d'
O
-i
N
N
N
M
N
w
N
N
N
N
N
N
r-1
M
a -i
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
lD
W
LD
W
LD
lD
W
WLL LL
O
h0
O
N.
V
6
O
O
O
O
lD
N
i,
i�
O
V
n
oa
O'
Ln
m
U,
h
N
I,
•N
y
OO
N
e
�I
OLn
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
inG
O
O
lD
N
,
r�
0 O
V'
n
00
C
d U
W
cu
o ���i
in
in
Ln
in
in
t/?
O 7
N
N
N
114
m
a)
0
o
O
h0
O
N.
V
6
O
O
O
O
lD
N
i,
i�
O
V
n
oa
O'
Ln
m
N
N
I,
OO
N
e
rl
_
O
O
O
O
lD
N
,
r�
0 O
V'
n
00
in
in
Ln
in
in
t/?
N
N
m
a)
0
J
a
-
•CL
06a
n
JPJ..�
L
O
C
E
E
Y
N
a
G
oc
0
K
vagi
Q6
'O
a
F
v
ac
E
-r
,
,
E
v
CL
m
11
W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
O
N
Mz*
O
O
N
O
d`
O
h
O
hOl
O
O
www
mto
w
in
OO
O0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ww
M
M
w
M
w
M
w
M
vl
M
w
M
in
M
w
M
w
M
vl
M
w
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
0
lD
lD
lD
W
W
lD
LD
W
W
W
tD
LD
i
7
D
C
al
G
W
bA
mc
L
a)
C.
O
H
f
u
0
N
a
a
cc
c
c
CD
Q
f6
0
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7E
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Public Works: Approval of Contract Completion Letter with Travelers pertaining to the
default of Performance System, Incorporated on the City's "UV Disinfection
Improvements" contract dated July 14, 2015 and payment of retainage to Travelers in
the amount of $11,900.35
MEETING NOTES
c✓i APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Page 1
Memo
To: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk,
From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager
CC: Warren Stewart, Emily Skoro
Date: 6/8/2017
Re: June 13 th City Council Meeting Agenda Item
The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the
June 13 th City Council Agenda under a Public Works Department Report for Council’s
consideration.
Approval of Contract Completion Letter with Travelers pertaining to the default of
Performance System, Incorporated on the City’s “UV Disinfection Improvements”
contract dated July 14, 2015 and payment of retainage to Travelers in the amount of
$11,900.35.00.
Recommended Council Action: Approval of Contract Completion Letter and
release of retention in the amount of $11,900.35.
Thank you for your consideration.
City of Meridian
Purchasing Dept.
Estimate
Date
4/5/2017
Estimate #
17-079
Name / Address
ESI inc.
12400 W Overland Rd
Boise, ID 83709
Terms
in full upon completion
Project
S. Construction Road Repair
Signature (Sign and Print Name)
Customer Phone
208-813-0138
Customer Fax
Permits, testing, engineering, surveying, and/or any other work not
specifically defined in this estimate is not included in total price.
All material is guaranteed to be as specifed. All work to be completed in a
workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or
deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed
only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and
above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or
delays beyond our control. Our workers are fully covered by Workman's
Compensation Insurance.
Acceptance of Proposal - The above prices,
specifications and conditions are sastisfactory and are
hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as
specifed. Payment will be made as outlined above.
This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not
accepted within 15 days.
Description Total
Excavate to sub-grade and haul off excavated material. Compact, before adding 8 inches of pit
run, fine grade, wet and compact. Place 4 inches of 3/4 inch road mix. Fine grade, wet and
compact, then furnish, haul, place and compact 3" Class I PG58-28 compound A.C. mat over
approximately 3924 sq. ft. Includes all necessary sawcutting.
15,696.00
_____________________________________
TRAVELERf 31650 6th Avenue So.
Suite 200
Federal Way, WA 98003
John Fouhy
Claim Counsel
Bond & Specialty lnsurance Claim
Phone: (253) 943-5806
Fax: (866) 842-9201
Email: jfouhy@travelers.com
June 7, 2017
Keith Watts
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho Avenue
Meridian, ID 83642
Re:Surety:
File No.:
Bond No
Principal
Obligee:
Proj ect:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
T1703494
106181573
Performance Systems Inc.
City of Meridian
Meridian UV Disinfection Improvements - Project 10055.A
Mr. Watts:
This letter is written regarding the above referenced project, and the intent ofthe City of Meridian
("Obligee" ) to complete this project.
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America ("Surety") and Obligee agree to the following
terms:
l. Obligee contracted with Performance Systems, Inc. ("PSI") for work on the above-
referenc€d project.
2. Surety issued performance and payment bonds for this project naming the City of
Meridian as Obligee.
3. On March 23, 2017, PSI defaulted on the above-referenced contract
4. Surety has paid $51,059.90 to subcontractors to date under the palment bond for work
completed by Subcontractors but not paid for by PSL
5. The remaining contract balance is $12,758.66. Obligee also currently holds $14,837.69 in
retainage.
6. Surety and Obligee are in receipt of a quote from Hazel Asphalt, attached, to complete all
remaining work on the project for $15,696.00.
7. Obligee hereby agrees to complete the contract utilizing Hazel Asphalt's quote and the
remaining contract fu nds.
8. Obligee agrees to release the remaining retainage in the amount of $l 1,900.35 to Surety
upon completion of the remaining work.
**t+,1**ri***r****+****** Our toll-fiee number is 800-842-8496 **t:Ir'r'*********'t:*:*:l'I*'Itlt
Itpossible, please serd futurE communications and docunents concerning lhis clarm via email to Jfouh},1@u'avekrs.com. Please include lhe
claim nunber in he subject line. (Please note that in certain cases we may strll Equesl original documents).
Travelers
June 7, 2017
Pawn 'l
9. Surety's performance bond shall remain in effect to cover PSI's warranty obligations in
Obligee's contract with PSI. Obligee must contact Surety and make a performance bond
claim for any warranty issue that arises.
10. Surety's obligations under the performance bond, this agreement, or Obligee's contract
with PSI, should any arise, are limited to the penal sum of its performance bond,
By signing this agreement below, each party consents and agrees to the terms contained herein.
Sincerely,
John M.Fouhy
Claim Counsel
CITY OF MERIDIAN
June ,2017
7a ___
By: T6LJee�
Its: A 0 Dr _ and
lawfully authorized representative.
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY
COMPANY OF AMERICA
June 7th , 2017
a--
Ey: hn j Foully
Its: Claim Counsel and
lawfully authorized representative.
Our toll-free number is 800-842-8496 *****+***************+**
If possible, please send future communications and documents concerning this claim via email to jfouhyt<ytmvelers.com Please include the
claim number in the subject line. (Please note that in certain eases we may still request original documents),
Ren I1 IWO C-03
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7F
ITEM TITLE: Clerk's Office
Paws in the Park Follow Up Report
PROJECT NUMBER:
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Paws in the Park
After Action
Report
City Clerk’s Office
Paws in the Park
Paws in the Park
Paws in the Park
Paws in the Park
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7G
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: Mayor's Office
MYAC Budget Amendment Not To Exceed $6,660
MEETING NOTES
M APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
M=3
W
0
T f
o
L W
C
_L
(D
i >
N a
w
LLI
v G
E
C 0
1{. {�
O •�
7 0
N
i••' LL al
U
�c-\C
^s
2
Vl aJ
O O
a
V
O O
^'
o
O �
N
� LL
L
v
Z Z
V
m
a
rn
LL
m
a
w
S r
r
W
N C
c
°u
C�
C
m
0
Q
•1-+
O
U
N
d
n
O)
E
M=3
W
0
T f
o
L W
C
_L
(D
i >
N a
w
LLI
v G
E
C 0
1{. {�
O •�
7 0
N
i••' LL al
U
V)
Y
2
Vl aJ
O O
a
V
O O
^'
o
O �
N
� LL
L
(D
Z Z
V)
m
m
to
m
O O
^'
l�-
u
O
O
i,
Z Z
V
m
tw
O
z
41'
m
O O
z z
❑e
r
trl
c
n
m
^O
U
U
cn
N
E
1~
r_00
in
Vv
e I
lr}
V?
o
}}
V4
c
O
Q
om
❑ ❑
u
C0
p0
N
>
N
0
E
n• n•
I Y
2
2
_a
a) U
N
Z•
i,
N
W
O •�
E to o
`a al
n
m
0
a/
m
G
w O
>
a
O
O 0
Q)
Q
LL
o
>
01
7
G
J
+L
O
LL
w
7
O
O
o
>o-zz
O
`°
Yz
LD
c c
ci
o
ar ai
°-
O
N
O
N
.-1
N
o
m
N
O
N
O
N
o
N
O
.-f
O
m
m
to
m
S
l�-
u
O
O
i,
u
V
m
tw
O
z
41'
C
O O
z z
G
r
trl
S
n
m
3
E
in
in
Vv
o
—
lr}
V?
o
c
V4
c
O
Q
om
u
a1
m
O
E
N
N
m
i,
N
W
d
0)
1-1
m
0
a/
m
al
to
t
O
Y
LL
o
>
01
C
Z)
Q
U
LL
W
a
C
a
E
w
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
LD
O
ci
N
m
1n
O
N
O
N
.-1
N
o
m
N
O
N
O
N
o
N
O
.-f
.-1
.-i
e-1
N
N
N
N
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
c
m
.-1
m
1-1
m
1•1
m
ei
m
ei
m
1-1
m
"
m
j
w
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
a`
O
oa
m
m
to
m
S
l�-
O
O
i,
N
LO
V
m
.-1
O
z
41'
O
z
O O
z z
r
trl
S
iA
in
in
Vv
in
lr}
V?
in
In
V4
VT
vt
in
om
m
to
m
O
O
i,
N
W
d
0)
1-1
to
1/1
Vf
V?
VT
<n
v
CL
c
j
w
O
N
c
N
al
y
lL
O
lL
N
C
N
3
��oav
G
v1
J
�--•
N
E
E
N
t
wv
_
v
E
c
N
o
v
m
`
F.
O
O
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
c
m
N
N
1Nrl
N
N
00m
N
In
n
n
m
to
to
to
to
to
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
H
m
.-i
m
r•1
m
ei
m
ei
m
e-1
m
14
m
e-1
m
c
m
•-1
m
1-1
m
1-1
m
H
m
H
i q
e•1
ei
-1
c-1
e -I
c -i
ei
.-1
a-1
1-1
11
N
r-1
----
C-
0
0
0
0
0
1----
0
I
C00
0
0
0
0
N
L
'O
C
al
0
w
0a
c
a!
CL
0
O
F
M
M
O
H
E
U
S
l�-
O
z
41'
O
z
O O
z z
r
S
M
M
O
H
E
U
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017
ITEM TITLE: Mayor's Office
2017 City Survey
ITEM NUMBER: 7H
PROJECT NUMBER:
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
2017 Citizen Satisfaction Survey
City of Meridian, Idaho
Presented by
June 2017
More than 2,150,000 Persons Surveyed Since 2006
for more than 900 cities in 49 States
A National Leader in Market Research
for Local Governmental Organizations
…helping city and county governments gather and use survey data to enhance
organizational performance for more than 30 years
2
ETC Institute
Agenda
•Purpose and Methodology
•Bottom Line Upfront
•Major Findings
•2
•Summary
•Questions
3
4
Purpose
•To objectively assess citizen satisfaction
with the delivery of City services
•To compare the City’s performance with
residents in other communities regionally
and nationally
•To measure trends from the 2014 survey
•To help determine priorities for the
community
5
Methodology
•Survey Description
seven-page survey; asked many of the same questions from
2014 survey
2nd citizen satisfaction survey administered for the City
•Method of Administration
by mail, online and phone to a random sample of City residents
each survey took approximately 15-20 minutes to complete
•Sample size:
goal number of surveys: 500
goal far exceeded: 743 completed surveys
demographics of survey respondents accurately reflects the
actual population of the City
•Confidence level: 95%
•Margin of error: +/-3.6% overall
Location of Survey
Respondents
City of Meridian
2017 Community
Survey
Good Representation throughout the City
6
7
Bottom Line Up Front
Residents Have a Very Positive Perception of the City
93% rated Meridian as an “excellent” or “good” place to raise a family
92% rated Meridian as an “excellent” or “good” place to live
The City Is Moving in the Right Direction
Satisfaction ratings have increased in 64 of 84 areas since 2014
Satisfaction with City Services Is Much Higher in Meridian
Than Other Communities
Satisfaction with the Overall Quality of City Services rated 30%
above the U.S. Average, and 25% above the Mountain Region Average
Meridian rated above the U.S. Average and Mountain Region Average
in 42 of the 46 areas
Highest Priorities for Residents Are: 1) Roads/Traffic/
Transportation, 2) Education/Schools, and 3)
Growth/Development
Major Finding #1
Residents Have a Very Positive
Perception of the City
8
Over 90% of Residents Rated Meridian as an Excellent or Good Place to
Live and Raise a Family 9
79% of Residents Feel the City Exceeds Expectation in the Overall Quality of City Services;
Only 3% Feel the City Doesn’t Meet Expectations 10
69% of Residents Feel the City Is Headed in the Right Direction;
Only 10% Don’t Feel the City Is Headed in the Right Direction 11
Satisfaction Is High for All City Services 12
72% of Residents Feel They Get Their Money’s Worth for City Tax Dollars and Fees;
Only 6% Don’t Feel They Get Their Money’s Worth 13
Satisfaction with the Overall Quality of City Services
14
ALL Areas Are in BLUE, Which
Indicates That the Overall
Quality of City Services
Exceeds Expectations in All
Parts of the City
Major Finding #2
The City Is Moving in the Right
Direction
15
16Significant Increases From 2014:Significant Decreases From 2014:16
17Significant Increases From 2014:Significant Decreases From 2014:17
18Significant Increases From 2014:Significant Decreases From 2014:18
19Significant Increases From 2014:Significant Decreases From 2014:19
20Significant Increases From 2014:Significant Decreases From 2014:20
21Significant Increases From 2014:Significant Decreases From 2014:21
22Significant Increases From 2014:Significant Decreases From 2014:22
23Significant Increases From 2014:Significant Decreases From 2014:23
Major Finding #3
Satisfaction Levels in Meridian
Are Significantly Higher than
the National and Regional
Averages in Most Areas
24
25Significantly Higher:Significantly Lower:25
26Significantly Higher:Significantly Lower:26
27Significantly Higher:Significantly Lower:27
28Significantly Higher:Significantly Lower:28
29Significantly Higher:Significantly Lower:29
30Significantly Higher:Significantly Lower:30
31Significantly Higher:Significantly Lower:31
Major Finding #4
Top Priorities
32
33
Residents Top Priorities Are: 1) Roads/Traffic/Transportation, 2) Education/Schools,
3) Growth/Development 33
34Top Priorities:
34
35Residents Rated Roadway Widening as the Most Important Transportation Improvement 35
Other Findings
36
3737
3838
3939
4040
4141
42
68% Are Very Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied with Their Overall Experience Downtown;
This Is a 9% Increase in Satisfaction from 2014 (59%)42
43
44
Summary
Residents Have a Very Positive Perception of the City
93% rated Meridian as an “excellent” or “good” place to raise a family
92% rated Meridian as an “excellent” or “good” place to live
The City Is Moving in the Right Direction
Satisfaction ratings have increased in 64 of 84 areas since 2014
Satisfaction with City Services Is Much Higher in Meridian
Than Other Communities
Satisfaction with the Overall Quality of City Services rated 30%
above the U.S. Average, and 25% above the Mountain Region Average
Meridian rated above the U.S. Average and Mountain Region Average
in 42 of the 46 areas
Highest Priorities for Residents Are: 1) Roads/Traffic/
Transportation, 2) Education/Schools, and 3)
Growth/Development
Questions?
THANK YOU!!
45
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 8A
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: /7-- 1733
r mance o. n Urclinance (Holy Apostles Uatriolic Churcn H-
2017-0019) For Annexation of a Parcel of Land Situated in a Portion of Government Lot
1 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho as
Described in Attachment "A" and Annexing Certain Lands and Territory, Situated in Ada
County, Idaho and Adjacent and Contiguous to the Corporate Limits of the city of
Meridian as Requested by the City of Meridian; Establishing and Determining the Land
Use Zoning Classification of Said Lands from RUT to C -C (Community Business District) in
the Meridian City Code; Providing that Copies of this Ordinance Shall be Filed with the
Arin C-'ni inti AccPccnr thr= Arin C'ni inti RpnnrrlPr nnrl the Irinhn StntP Tnx C'nmmieeinn-
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-054340
BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 06/15/2017 10:15 AM
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 1 -7— ( 3/
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVE, NER,
M11LAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS
AN ORDINANCE (H-2017-0019 HOLY APOSTLES CATHOLIC CHURCH) FOR
ANNEXATION FOR A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT
LOT 1 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA
COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN
LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND
CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS
REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE
LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LANDS FROM RUT TO C -C
(COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT) IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING
THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY
ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX
COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE
ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO:
SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description
herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" are within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian,
Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re -zoning by the
owner of said property, to -wit; Ronian Catholic Diocese of Boise.,
SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re -zoned from
RUT to C -C (Community Business District) in the Meridian City Code.
SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the
Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property.
SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the
laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re -zone said
property.
SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well
as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of
the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance.
ANNEXATION -- HOLY APOSTLES CATHOLIC CHURCH (H 2017-0019) Page 1 of 3
SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled.
SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full farce and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication, according to law.
SECTION 8. The Cleric of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the
effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a
draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of
Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file
simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission ofthe State
of Idaho.
SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the
Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings bytitle and one (1) reading in
full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force
and effect upon its passage, approval and publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
day of _ U.A/ _ , 2017.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
r
day of S QAe, , 2017.
MAYOR TV4MY de WEERD
ATTEST:
1 s,
AY CUES, CITY CLERK 4 cuy
EP IMAM2.
7i
SPIAL 4t
ANNEXATION — HOLY APOSTLES CATHOLIC CHURCH (H 2017-0019) Page 2 of 3
STATE OF IDAHO, )
ss:
County of Ada )
On this I e day of J Lj ne , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public
in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY de WEERD and C.JAY COLE, S, known to
me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed
the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year first above written.
.00040,
(SEAL) ; ` goTA, Sty �.
■
■
i ^` G` �
. C raAlry WM,=-
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDkIO
RESIDING Il AI MY iCOMMISSION �' i' Ida
ANNEXATION -HOLY APOS'T'LES CATHOLIC CHURCH (H 2017-0019) Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A
C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map for Annexation Boundary
February 13, 2016
Project No, 115210
THE LAND GROUP, WC,
Parcel A
Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise
Holy Apostles Catholic Church
Page S of 1
A parcel of land situated in a portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1
East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Northwest Section Corner of said Section 30, marked by a brass cap
monument;
Thence on the north line of said section 30, South 89°50'45" East, 1101.92 feet, to a point
on the easterly line of aforementioned Government Lot 1;
Thence leaving said north line, South 00°29'32" West, 443.84 feet, on said easterly line;
Thence leaving said easterly line, North 89"52'46" West, 361.45 feet;
Thence South 00°29'32" West, 290.00 feet;
Thence North 89°52'46" West, 494.67 feet;
Thence South 44°08'46" West, 39.13 feet;
Thence South 88'20'02° West, 217,97 feet, to a point on the west line of aforementioned
Section 30;
Thence on said west line, North 00°25'09" East, 769.42 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described parcel of land contains 16.32 acres more or less, subject to all existing
easements and rights-of-way of record.
PREPARED BY:
THE LAND GROUP, INC.
462 E. SHORE DRIVE, SUITE 100
EAGLE, IDAHO 83616
208-939.4041
Michael S. Femenia
02/ 012017
Sita Plrntninry -I onekalpe Architecture Gulf Coune froyation & cl)yfnerring n Grophir commm)(Carion r surveying
,16) (, Shore Orive, Ste. 100, Fagle, Idalto 33616 a F 205.939A041 F 208.939-44445 « mrvxv,thelandaroupinc.com
Holy Apostles — AZ H-2017-0019 PAGE 12
IIW COR SEC 30
I
5,24 S.19
S.251.d
1� Poll
EXHIBIT B
HICHW4Y 20/26(C'HINDVJV BLVD)
h18W50'45'W 2420.06'
S89150'45'E 1101.92' T
ti
C
5;
i.f
In
tD
"M N
t j ! S08'20'02'W 217,97'
hi88°52`46'N!
S44�fi8'46'YI 39,18'
� 1
Io I
1 St. l0nau
HACIENDA
W 114 COR SEC 30
N 1l4 COR SEC $0
1316.94'
cq
cq
i
SUBDIVISION t
Parcel IN Annexation
116VrOtift VMf-. 1'. U0,
Holy Apostles — AZ H-2017-0019
O 0
d1 CS
_Q 0
Q e�C
LLl
rn
CEJ v
CL
>= 4
zn
C
cc
UIE LAND GROUP
rtt tur W. a,.r. Fwr..�o
fhc4
�I
9i
PARCEL A
�
16.32 Acres=
1,189'62'46V 361.45'
o ....
1
m
N
O
494.67'
o
E3
I
I
Is Catholic School
I
1
i
SUBDIVISION t
Parcel IN Annexation
116VrOtift VMf-. 1'. U0,
Holy Apostles — AZ H-2017-0019
O 0
d1 CS
_Q 0
Q e�C
LLl
rn
CEJ v
CL
>= 4
zn
C
cc
UIE LAND GROUP
rtt tur W. a,.r. Fwr..�o
fhc4
NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A)
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17 -
PROVIDING FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE
An Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting annexation and zoning for a parcel
of land Situated in a portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 30, Township 4 North,
Range 1 East, Boise, Ada County, Idaho. This parcel contains 16.32 acres more or less.
Also, this parcel is SUBJECT TO all easements and rights-of-way of record or implied.
As surveyed in attached exhibit "B" and is not based on an actual field survey. A full
text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East
Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the
day of ", , 2017.
x oS
City of MeVity
ian
Mayoar and Council
By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk
/111 City of
EP,1DIA1` t--,
IDMIO
�. SEL qJ-
First Reading:'
Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code
§50-902: YES- NO
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 17 -
The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian,
Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of
the attached Ordinance No. 17- of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found
the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to
Idaho Code § 50-901A (3).
DATED this I day of 5 L)N , 2017.
6
William. L.M. Nary
City Attorney
ORDINANCE SUMMARY - HOLY APOSTLES CATHOLIC CHURCH (H-2017-0019)
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-054342
BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 06/15/2017 10:16 AM
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17 f 17 3 ?- A
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER,
MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS
AN ORDINANCE (H-2016-0027 MAVERHQ FOR ANNE XATIONFOR PART OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND
ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO,
AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND
DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SAID LANDS FROM C-2
TO C -G (GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) IN THE
MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND
THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING
FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE
READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO:
SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description
herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" are within the corporate limits ofthe City of Meridian,
Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re -zoning by the
owner of said property, to -wit, Russel S. Barger.
SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re -zoned from
C-2 to C -G (General Retail and Service Commercial District) in the Meridian City Code.
SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the
Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property.
SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the
laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re -zone said
property.
SECTION S. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well
as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of
the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance.
ANNEXATION — MAVERIK (H 2016-0027) Page 1 of 3
SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof hi conflict herewith are
hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled.
SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in fall force and effect fiom and after its passage,
approval and publication, according to law.
SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the
effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a
draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of
Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file
simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State
of Idaho.
SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the
Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in
full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force
and effect upon its passage, approval and publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
day of 5 Ui✓e , 2017.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
day of J U/'/(� , 2017.
MAYOR de WEERD
ATTEST:
�eo,Vnxrpn(I -�
G� jrsC
,'p,�
Y LES, CITY CLERK City ofEIS I-(' IANk-
i
r. 'alpAtlO
EAiL ti:•
ANNEXATION -- MAVERIIC (H 2016-0027) Page 2 of 3
STATE OF IDAHO, )
ss:
County of Ada )
On this 13"' day of 6 UYIP_ , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notazy Public
in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY de WEERD and C.JAY COLES, known to
me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed
the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year first above written.
(SEAL) •Mrrrrrr
♦•.• ,NRL�'••.••
DA119 0*
•••.•1111••.
0'�ayjnp
W
NOTARY PUBLIC FO IDAHO
RESIDING AT:
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 3 -a?-A09a
ANNEXATION — MAVERIK (II 2016-0027) Page 3 of 3
Legal Description
4&Reeve
& Associates, Inc,
02.18.16
Exhibit A
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
LEGAL DIESCRIPTION
PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE I EAST,
BOISE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FAIRVIEW
AVENUE, SAID POINTBEING N89°53'54"W ALONG THE SECTION LINE, 80.82 FEET AND
S00°06'06"W 28.92 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE
S46° 17'39"E 45.48 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD;
THENCE DUE SOUTH ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 678.05 FEET TO THE
NORTH LINE OF KEZIAH SUBDIVISION; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE THE
FOLLOWING THREE COURSES: (1) N37°43'00"W 304.99 FEET; (2) N55°47'00"W 117.23 FEET;
AND (3) S84°25'50"W 48.86 FEET; THENCE N00°00' 15"E 326.80 FEET; THENCE N21'56'21 "E
86.88 FEET TO T14E SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE; THENCE
589"58'54"E ALONG SAID SOLI'i'HERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 267.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 170,190 SQUARE FEET OR 3.907 ACRES
Maverik — AZ H-2016-0027
EXHIBIT
�XHIBIT MAP TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL I)LSCRIPTION
ANWOTION AREA
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
T30,821 NORTHEAST CORNER Qt
3,07 AMES SCALL 1"=1(30'
Reeve
, Ir Gum- Ulm 941m
Mayeflk, Inc.
WNW, Idaho
PROJECT NM VEO-M)
M DWG FILE;
DRAM BY:
K4avehk—AZH-2O1s*0z7
NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A)
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17- { 7,3,)- AT
PROVIDING FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE
An Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting annexation and zoning for part of
the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise, Ada County,
Idaho. This parcel contains 3.907 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is SUBJECT TO
all easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. As surveyed in attached exhibit
"B" and is not based on an actual field survey. A full text of this ordinance is available
for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian,
Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the :)2-11'' day of A JAt62 ,
2017. .
of Mdridi
Mayor and City Council
By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk
First Reading ✓ f
Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code
§50-902: YES NO
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 17- J 7 ,�1_
The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian,
Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of
the attached Ordinance No. 17- of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found
the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to
Idaho Code § 50-901A (3).
DATED this f day of , 2017.
William. L.M. Nary
City Attorney
ORDINANCE SUMMARY - MAVERIK (H-2016-0027)
4
GU
YW
_ City of Qay )^R
lG A11Q .yf'
Y
S
First Reading ✓ f
Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code
§50-902: YES NO
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 17- J 7 ,�1_
The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian,
Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of
the attached Ordinance No. 17- of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found
the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to
Idaho Code § 50-901A (3).
DATED this f day of , 2017.
William. L.M. Nary
City Attorney
ORDINANCE SUMMARY - MAVERIK (H-2016-0027)
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9
ITEM TITLE:
Future Meeting Topics
PROJECT NUMBER:
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: June 13, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 10
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Executive session per Idaho Code Sections 74-206(1)(b) to Consider the Evaluation,
Dismissal or Disciplining of, or to Hear Complaints or Charges Brought Against, a Public
Officer, Employee, Staff Member or Individual Agent and 74-206(1) (f), to Communicate
with Legal Counsel for the Public Agency to Discuss the Legal Ramifications of and
Legal Options for Pending Litigation
MEETING NOTES
Aj
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS