2017-05-23Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 23, 2017 – Page 1 of 6
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
1.
City Council Chambers
33 East Broadway Avenue
Meridian, Idaho
Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 6:00 PM 6:01PM
1. Roll-Call Attendance
X Anne Little Roberts X Joe Borton
X Ty Palmer X Keith Bird
__X___ Genesis Milam __X___ Luke Cavener
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Community Invocation by Troy Drake with Calvary Chapel
4. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted as amended
5. Amended onto agenda: Proclamation for Rocky Mountain High School Golf State
Champions Day
6. Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum)
This time is reserved for the public to address their elected officials regarding matters of general
interest or concern of public matters and is not specific to an active land use/development
application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented under this public comment
section, other than the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting
agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further
assist you in resolving the matter following the meeting.
7. Consent Agenda Approved
A. Approve Minutes of May 9, 2017 City Council Workshop Meeting
B. Approve Minutes of May 16, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting
C. Approve Minutes of May 16, 2017 City Council Special Meeting
D. Resolution No. 17-2014: A Resolution for the Donation of Surplus
Computer Equipment to Meridian Food Bank, Nampa School District, Boys
& Girls Club of Ada County, Star Fire Department and Computers for Kids
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR
AMENDED MEETING AGENDA
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 23, 2017 – Page 2 of 6
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
E. Resolution No. 17-2015: A Resolution for the Vacation of a Portion of the
10-foot wide Public Utility, Drainage and Irrigation (PUDI) Easement
Located between Lots 4 and 5 of Block and Lots 4 and 5 of Block 5 platted
with Troutner Park Subdivision No. 2 (Rainier Villas)
F. Final Order for Hill's Century Farm Commercial No. 1 (H-2017-0051) by
Century Farm Development, LLC Located 1/2 Mile East of S. Eagle Road on
South of E. Amity Road
G. Final Order for Paisley Meadows No. 2 (H-2017-0056) by Hayden Homes
Idaho, LLC Located 2180 E. Amity Road
H. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Belltower Park (H-2017-
0053) by Bridgetower Crossing, LLC & T3 Holdings, LLC Located 3140 &
3150 W. Belltower Drive
I. City Financial Report for April 2017
J. Approval for Finance to Pay Vendor Payments of $1,009,249.25
8. Items Moved From the Consent Agenda
9. Community Items/Presentations
A. City Scholarship Presentations
B. Dairy Board Request for Cost Share for the Annual Dairy Days Parade
Approved not-to-exceed $4,600
C. ACHD Chipseal Program
10. Action Items
Land Use Public Hearing Process: After the Public Hearing is opened the staff report will be
presented by the assigned City planner. Following Staff’s report the applicant has up to 15
minutes to present their application. Each member of the public may provide testimony up to 3
minutes or if they are representing a larger group, such as a Homeowners Association, they are
allowed 10 minutes. The applicant is then allowed 10 additional minutes to respond to the
public’s comments. No additional public testimony is taken once the public hearing is closed.
The City Council may move to continue the item for additional information or vote to approve or
deny the item with or without changes as presented. The Mayor is not a member of the City
Council and pursuant to Idaho Code does not vote on public hearing items, unless to break a tie
vote.
A. Continued from May 16, 2017: Final Plat for Bainbridge Subdivision No. 5
(H-2017-0043) by Brighton Investments, LLC Located Approximately 1/2
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 23, 2017 – Page 3 of 6
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Mile South of W. Chinden Boulevard and 1/4 Mile West of N. Ten Mile Road
Approved
1. Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Twenty-Six (26) Building Lots
and Four (4) Common Lots on 7.56 Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning
District
B. Public Meeting for Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. 5 (H-2017-0060) by
Schultz Development Located 635 E. Vivid Sky Drive
Approved
1. Request: Vacate the Slope Easement on Lot 17, Block 12 of Reflection
Ridge Subdivision No. 5
C. Public Hearing for Gyro Shack at Paramount (H-2017-0059) by Jeff Likes
Located 5038 N. Linder Road
Approved
1. Request: Council Review to Reduce the Required Twenty-Five (25) Foot
Landscape Buffer on the East Property Boundary
D. Public Hearing for Goddard Creek (H-2017-0007) by Brian Porter Located
2780 W. McMillan Road
Continued to June 6, 2017
1. Request: Rezone of 12.38 Acres of Land from R-4 to the R-40 (5 Acres)
and the C-C (7.38 Acres) Zoning Districts
2. Request: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
to Change the Land Use Designation on 12.38 Acres of Land from Office
and High Density Residential to Mixed-Use Community
3. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Self -Storage Facility Consisting of
Ten (10) Buildings on Approximately 7.38 Acres of Land in the Proposed
C-C Zoning District
4. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Multi-Family Development
Consisting of Eighty-Two (82) Dwelling Units in the Proposed R-40 Zoning
District on Five (5) Acres of Land
5. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Twenty-Two (22)
Building Lots, and Five (5) Common Lots on 12.38 Acres of Land in the
Proposed C-C and R-40 Zoning Districts
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 23, 2017 – Page 4 of 6
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
6. Request: Amendment to an Existing Development Agreement (Lochsa
Falls Inst. #103012598) to Update the Development Plan for this Site from
Office to Multi-Family and Self Storage
E. Public Hearing for New Beginnings (H-2017-0026) by Chris Fuhrman
Located 780 E. Ustick Road
Approved
1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 1.00 Acre of Land with an R-4 Zoning
District
2. Request: Short Plat Approval Consisting of Two (2) Building Lots on 0.73
of an Acre of Land
F. Public Hearing for Rockbury Subdivision (H-2017-0018) by Rock Harbor
Church, Inc. Located 6437 N. Tree Haven Way
Approved
1. Request: Rezone of 25.06 Acres of Land from R-15 (8.95 Acres) and C-N
(16.11 Acres) to R-15 (6.71 Acres) and C-N (18.35 Acres) Zoning Districts
2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Two (2) Common Lots,
One (1) Commercial Lot and One (1) Multi-Family Lot on 23.56 Acres of
Land in the Proposed R-15 and C-N Zoning Districts
3. Request: Variance to Allow a Limited Access (Right-In/Right-Out) Through
a Shared Driveway onto Chinden Boulevard
4. Request: To be Removed from the Existing Development A greement for
Tree Farm (Inst. #106151518) and to be Placed in a Separate
Development Agreement for this Development
11. Department Reports
A. Finance: Agreements
1. Approval of Award of RFP and Agreement to Enviro-Care for the
“PERFORATED PLATE SCREENS EQUIPMENT” for the Headworks
Expansion project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $522,400.00. This
agreement is being funded in two fiscal years: 2017 (Oct. 2016 – Sept.
2017) $52,240.00; 2018 (Oct. 2017 – Sept. 2018) $470,160.00.
Approved
2. Approval of Award of RFP and Agreement to JWC Environmental for the
“WASHER COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT” for the Headworks Expansion
project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $309,750.00. This agreement is
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 23, 2017 – Page 5 of 6
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
being funded in two fiscal years: 2018 (Oct. 2017 – Sept. 2018)
$278,775.00; 2019 (Oct. 2018 – Sept. 2019) $30,975.00.
Approved
3. Approval of Supply Agreement to APSCO, LLC for the “Hidrostal Pumps
for the WRRF Headworks Expansion” project for a Not -To-Exceed amount
of $1,165,737.00 with 2017 spending authority of $233,174.40.
Approved
4. Award of Bid and Approval of Construction Contract to The Ewing
Company, Inc. for the “WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion” project for
a Not-To-Exceed amount of $9,729,000.00 with 2017 spending authority
of $4,075,037.00
Approved
B. Police: Intergovernmental Memorandum of Understanding of use of
Meridian Police Department Canine Holding Facility between City of
Meridian and Bureau of Land Management
Approved
12. Ordinances
A. Ordinance No. 17-1728: An Ordinance (Bancroft Square MDA H-2016-0055)
For the Re-Zone of a Portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of
Meridian, Ada County Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land Use
Zoning Classification From R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential) to R-8
(Medium Low Density Residential) Zoning Districts in the Meridian City
Code; Providing that Copies of this Ordinance shall be Filed with the Ada
County Assessor, The Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax
Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the
Ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and Providing
an Effective Date.
Approved
B. Ordinance No. 17-1729: An Ordinance (Oaks South - H-2017-0010) For the
Re-Zone of Parcels of Land Situated in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33,
Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning
Classification From L-O (Limited Office) to R-8(Medium Density
Residential)(0.005 acres); L-O (Limited Office) to R-15 (Medium-High
Density Residential)(0.001 acres); R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential)
to L-O (Limited Office)(0.04); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) to R-8
(Medium Density Residential)(0.22 acres); R-15 (Medium-High Density
Residential) to R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential)(0.19); R-8 (Medium
Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential)(0.31); and R-
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, May 23, 2017 – Page 6 of 6
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
4 (Medium Low Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Density
Residential)(0.07)zoning districts, in the Meridian City Code; Providing that
Copies of this Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor, the
Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required
by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and providing for a
waiver of the reading rules; And Providing an Effective Date.
Approved
13. Future Meeting Topics
Adjourned at 10:56pm
Meridian City Council May 23, 2017.
A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:02 p.m., Tuesday,
May 23, 2017, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Joe Borton, Genesis
Milam, Luke Cavener, Anne Little Roberts and Ty Palmer.
Others Present: Bill Nary, C.Jay Coles, Bruce Chatterton, Josh Beach, Clint
Dolsby, Jeff Brown, Charlie Butterfield, and Dean Willis.
Item 1: Roll-call Attendance:
Roll call.
X__ Anne Little Roberts X _ _Joe Borton
X__ Ty Palmer X__ Keith Bird
__X__ Genesis Milam __X__ Lucas Cavener
__X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
De Weerd: I would like to welcome all of you to our City Council meeting. We will
go ahead and get his meeting started. Thank you for joining us. For the record it
is Tuesday, May 23rd. It's a little bit after 6:00. We will start with roll call
attendance, Mr. Clerk.
Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance
De Weerd: Item No. 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in
the pledge to our flag.
(Pledge of Allegiance recited.)
Item 3: Community Invocation by Troy Drake with Calvary Chapel
De Weerd: Item No. 3 is our community invocation. Tonight we will be led by
Pastor Troy Drake who is with Calvary Chapel. If you will, please, join us in the
community invocation or take this as an opportunity for a moment of reflection.
Thank you.
Drake: Father in Heaven, we just first off tonight, God, heavy on our hearts for
what's happened in Manchester, England. We just pray for those who are fighting
for their lives and for those who lost loved ones and, you know, just these
senseless tragedies being so commonplace now and it grieves our soul and so
just pray for you to help, God. Your Word says I look to the hills, where does my
help come from. Our help comes from you, the Lord God, who makes heaven and
earth and so we just ask your help in this situation, that you would aid those who
need it and, Lord, just here in Meridian we pray that your hand of protection would
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 2 of 99
be upon our city, especially those who are first responders, the ones who keep the
peace here, God, that serve you and so we just pray for our city and we thank you
so much for it and for all that you do for us and -- and the freedom that we have in
the United States and to elect our representatives and so for that we just thank you
for these people here who serve our community and we pray that you would just
bless them tonight in this City Council meeting and that you would give them great
wisdom and the ability to discern what they should do and not do , whether it's a
small matter or a big matter, and so, Lord, we just pray for their service that you
would bless their life and that you would be over this time and it's in your name we
pray, amen. Thanks for the opportunity.
Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda
De Weerd: Thank you. Item No. 4 is adoption of the agenda.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: We need to add Item 5, which is the proclamation for Rocky Mountain High
School Golf State Championship Day. Item 7-D under the Consent, the resolution
number is 17-2014. E, the resolution number is 17-2015. I think they give me
stuck paper. There we go. And under 12, ordnances, A, ordinance number is 17-
1728 and B is 17-1729. And with that I move we approve the amended agenda.
Borton: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the agenda. All those in
favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 5: Amended onto agenda: Proclamation for Rocky Mountain High
School Golf State Champions Day
De Weerd: I'm going to move down to the podium. So, it's always a privilege to
be able to recognize our high school athletes when they achieve such a
momentous occasion as state champions and so I'd like to invite the Rocky
Mountain golf team to come stand with me. Now, I have a proclamation to read in
their honor and for you all, so it may not seem like a big deal now, but someday
you may want to say to your kids I had a name -- or a day named after me. So,
your names will be in our public record and you ca n go back to this day and you
will see your name, your accomplishment, and -- because this is a big deal. So,
I'm going to read a proclamation that doesn't list the names, but your names are
on the second proclamation that I will present to your coach, so -- whereas being
a Rocky Mountain golfer is more than driving fairways, putting the greens, making
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 3 of 99
par and having a perfect swing, it is training to build character, leadership,
confidence, teamwork and resilience, traits needed to be successful on the course,
in the classroom, and in the real world and whereas the Rocky Mountain golf team
posted a final score of 580 at the 2017 state championship tournament for golf and
whereas their hard work, determination, and teamwork resulted in a 48 stroke
victory to repeat as state champions and bring home the 2017 state golf title and
whereas capturing the state title builds school spirit and allows these student
athletes bragging rights as they walk the halls of Rocky Mountain and whereas the
leadership, training, and discipline of their coach and -- their coaches help all the
team members to focus their talents and passion to become a winning team with
each player making valuable contributions to their victory. Therefore, I, Mayor
Tammy de Weerd, hereby proclaim May 23rd, 2017, as Rocky Mountain High
School Golf State Champions Day in the City of Meridian and call upon the
community to join me in congratulating the Grizzlies on repeating as state
champions and for representing Meridian so proudly in the state tournament. So,
please, join me in congratulating these young athletes. Now, I will ask that each
of you introduce yourself and say what year in school you are. But I will first
present this certificate -- proclamation to your coach. I also have a City of Meridian
pin for each of you and, coach, if you need extras I would love to give you those.
But my congratulations to you and your team . My dad was a golf coach. Never
golfed with him, because he will always be a coach, but certainly I know the hard
work you put into it and we are just very proud of you.
Tidd: My name is Sam Tidd and I'm a junior at Rocky.
Slocum: My name is Jake Slocum and I'm a freshman.
Downs: My name is Ranger Downs and I'm a senior.
Barry: Carson Barry, also a junior.
Reinke: My name is Drew Reinke and I am also a junior.
McCrady: My name is Mike McCrady, I'm the head golf coach at Rocky and I just
want to say thank you for recognizing these young men for the hard work they
have put in. It is a year-long process -- pretty much a lifetime process for these
boys to -- to excel the way they have and they represent ed this city very well and
are going to move on, some of them, into college ranks already and I'm pretty
excited to send off our senior. He's going to go play at Oklahoma Christian and
play golf in college that we have got a couple of other signees that are going to be
signing next year with their schools and probably two more along the way. Very
blessed to be honored with such good kids, even though sometimes they are late
and he will run for that next year. I did tell -- I did tell -- I do tell our Councilman
Palmer that we have a traffic problem in this city, so if you could get on that we --
we would all be on time. Of course he said that wasn't in his sphere of
responsibility, so -- anyway, I just want to say that we are truly blessed to be here
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 4 of 99
at Rocky Mountain and representing such a quality school with Mike Hirano on our
administration and Troy Rice our ID, just quality, quality people that back us up all
the time and got good teachers, good students, and even better golfers, which is
pretty -- pretty awesome. So, thanks again for honoring us with this and we are
truly blessed to represent Meridian. Thank you.
Palmer: I think the bigger problem is that we have a bunch high school students
running around in sweatshirts in 90 degree weather.
McCready: This is something they are very proud of and it's the only thing we get.
We don't get rings, because that's too cheesy. So, we represent ourselves in
sweatshirts and they will have to turn around and show you what the back is,
because that's pretty awesome.
Item 6: Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes
Maximum)
De Weerd: Council, I'm going to go ahead and do the next couple of items from
here. Our next item for the agenda is future meeting topics. Mr. Clerk, did we
have anyone signed up?
Coles: Madam Mayor, zero sign ups tonight.
Item 7: Consent Agenda
A. Approve Minutes of May 9, 2017 City Council Workshop
Meeting
B. Approve Minutes of May 16, 2017 City Council Regular
Meeting
C. Approve Minutes of May 16, 2017 City Council Special
Meeting
D. Resolution No. 17-2014: A Resolution for the Donation
of Surplus Computer Equipment to Meridian Food Bank,
Nampa School District, Boys & Girls Club of Ada
County, Star Fire Department and Computers for Kids
E. Resolution No. 17-2015: A Resolution for the Vacation of
a Portion of the 10-foot wide Public Utility, Drainage and
Irrigation (PUDI) Easement Located between Lots 4 and
5 of Block and Lots 4 and 5 of Block 5 platted with
Troutner Park Subdivision No. 2 (Rainier Villas)
F. Final Order for Hill's Century Farm Commercial No. 1 (H-
2017-0051) by Century Farm Development, LLC Located
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 5 of 99
1/2 Mile East of S. Eagle Road on South of E. Amity
Road
G. Final Order for Paisley Meadows No. 2 (H-2017-0056) by
Hayden Homes Idaho, LLC Located 2180 E. Amity Road
H. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for
Belltower Park (H-2017- 0053) by Bridgetower Crossing,
LLC & T3 Holdings, LLC Located 3140 & 3150 W.
Belltower Drive
I. City Financial Report for April 2017
J. Approval for Finance to Pay Vendor Payments of
$1,009,249.25
De Weerd: Okay. So, we will move to Item 7, the Consent Agenda.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: As stated earlier Item 7-D, the resolution number is 17-2014. Item E, the
resolution number is 17-2015 and with that I move we approve the agenda as
printed and the Clerk to sign -- Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign.
Borton: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. If there
is no discussion, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 8: Items Moved From the Consent Agenda
De Weerd: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda.
Item 9: Community Items/Presentations
A. City Scholarship Presentations
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 6 of 99
De Weerd: So, we will move to Item 9-A, our city scholarships. So, this is kind of
bitter sweet and I hope I won't get emotional, but no guarantees that I won't,
because I certainly know several of these over the last several years and it's hard
saying goodbye. But our scholarship program is funded by our sponsors that fund
the State of the City and so this is all money from business sponsors that want to
not only invest in an event, but also that their proceeds have, over the last eight
years, funded for 1,000 dollar scholarships. Part of the criteria to be eligible for the
scholarship is you need to graduate in the spring and I 'm assuming all of you are
graduating. They need to live in Meridian or be a member of the Mayor's Youth
Advisory Council. They need to demonstrate leadership potential through
community involvement, as well as volunteerism. We also look at school activities
or their work experience. Preference -- extra points are given -- are given to
students that have gone through our Alive At 25 safe driving course and these are
-- all of the applications are rated by a group -- a panel of citizens, City Council
members, chamber members and those that look and weigh each of the criteria.
So, I'm very pleased to announce our winners and they are here to receive their
certificate. The money goes directly to the college, so I won't be presenting any
checks today, but we are just really proud of these young leaders. I will ask each
of the four that we are recognizing today that as you go off and spread your wings
and go to that next chapter in furthering your education, that you will come home
afterwards. We can't afford to export our talent. We want you to come back home
when you're ready to start your careers and start them here in this valley. Certainly
those of you that are Mayor's Youth Advisory Council members, you have left a
legacy in our community and each of the four have left their legacy through their
various volunteerism, their leadership in the various activities they are involved in,
and when I read a little narrative about each of them you will see that we can't
afford to lose these young leaders. So, the first leader that I will be recognizing is
Hannah Chambers. Hannah, if you will come up and stand with me. You get the
benefit of standing here while I talk about you. So, Hannah Chambers is
graduating for Meridian High School. Hannah says her passion to become a
veterinarian started when she was three and has never wavered. She has also
made volunteering and giving back to the community a priority in her daily life. She
has served in the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council, volunteered at the Meridian
Food Bank, Toys For Tots Drive and has been an advocate for Be The Match
raising money, educating others and adding donors to the registry to save lives,
but only in Meridian, but all over the world. Hannah plans to -- and Hannah plans
to attend the College of Idaho and major in biology, with a minor in animal science,
in the hopes of becoming a veterinarian. Hannah was very instrumental in bringing
the agility equipment to the Storey Bark Park. She gave a beautiful addition to this
by her passion for animals and her passion for our community . So, please, join
me in congratulating Hannah Chambers.
Chambers: All right. I just wanted to say thank you to everyone. My family. My
friends. My Mayor's Youth Advisory Council friends. I have grown a lot since I
was a freshman and I'm really glad that I got to grow up here , because there is a
lot of worse places you could live and I -- and we truly are the best city to live in
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 7 of 99
and I just want to thank everyone in this community for supporting all of our youth
and giving back and showing that there is still good that we can look for every day.
So, thank you.
De Weerd: Our second is -- so, Colby, I don't know how to say your last name,
but I will guess -- no, I won't. Come on up and, then, you can tell me how to say
your last name.
Jogstor: Jogstor.
De Weerd: Jogstor. So, now you know why I asked first. So, Colby is graduating
from Renaissance High School with a weighted GPA of 4.18. Colby has a passion
for giving back to his community and peers. He has volunteered to be a special
education peer tutor, as well as a scribe writing tutor during his years in high
school. Colby has volunteered his time at the Idaho Food Bank, as well as
organizing events for Toys For Tots. As a founder coordinator of the International
Baccalaureate For Jump Program -- the Jump Program, Colby designed a program
to connect junior and senior classes to share academic resources between groups.
Colby plans to attend the University of Arizona and major in public health. Please
join me in welcoming -- or congratulating Colby.
Jogstor: Okay. I'm sorry, everyone, I'm not in MYAC, so I don't know how to use
a microphone, but I'm going to try. I just -- I would really like to thank the community
for this honor, because everything I live and do, whether it's public health or falling
into this weird pit of anthropology that I have been in this last year, is focused on
giving back to the community. So, I really appreciate you guys -- or I shouldn't say
you guys. I really appreciate you all, I don't know, helping me in this journey to
kind of give back to other communities, ours included. Thank you.
De Weerd: Cheyenne. So, Cheyenne Quilter is graduating also from Renaissance
High School. She was ranked first in the class of associate degree students at her
high school. She has been a leader in the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council for the
last four years, serving the last year as the chair. In addition to her time in MYAC
Cheyenne has served as a youth commissioner on the Meridian Arts Commission.
Volunteering and giving back to our community is a priority to Cheyenne and she
gave more than 500 hours and two years of volunteer service for communities in
Idaho. She is also the creator and founder of the Idaho Water Safety Pals program.
Cheyenne will begin college this fall at West Point Military Academy where she
hopes to enter into a career in law with emphasis in international relations in the
Middle East. Please join me in congratulating this young lady.
Quilter: First of all, thank you all for this amazing community and putting together
these scholarships and pitching in to make sure that t he youth and the leaders of
this next generation are really able to achieve their dreams. I don't know where I'd
be without the community of Meridian. I want us to call it the City of Meridian,
because, really, it's more of a community. You guys have so many opportunities
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 8 of 99
for every single generation and it's become so apparent that this community comes
together to provide opportunities and to strengthen as one and that has just
become so apparent. So, thank you all for helping foster the leaders of the next
generation.
De Weerd: Lance Baumgartner. You do not have to be in MYAC, but it does give
you extra points and certainly -- what you will find from many of the MYAC
members is they have somehow learned how to balance life, all their volunteerism,
their grades, because they are excellent students, but I can tell you that they have
left a real legacy in our community. Lance is graduating also from Renaissance
High School with a weighted GPA of 4.17. Lance is a member of MYAC and a
leader in participatory budgeting subcommittee within MYAC. Lance has served
for two years as the member of -- on the Meridian Transportation Commission.
Through his actions you can tell he has a passion for giving back to his community
and volunteering. Lance has also participated in Rake Up Meridian, Toys For Tots,
Toy Drive, Operation Christmas Child and volunteered at the food bank, as well as
numerous other volunteer activities. Lance plans to further his education and study
in international corporate law, with an emphasis in development of third world
countries. Please join me in congratulating Lance.
Baumgartner: Hello. I want to say thank you. Thank you to the City Council and
Mayor Tammy for investing so much in Meridian's youth, including myself. I love
Meridian and this community is so inspirational and it's driven me to accomplish
more and I hope I do the city and all of you proud as I take my next step s in my
life. So, thank you for your help and support. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. So, I know where you guys live, so you better be coming back,
because I know your parents, too. So, thank you for joining us and you don't have
to stay through the entire program.
Cavener: It's not in the fine print?
B. Dairy Board Request for Cost Share for the Annual Dairy
Days Parade
De Weerd: It's not in the fine print. Item 9-B is the Dairy Board, a request for cost
share for the annual Dairy Days Parade and we have Hans Bruijn here with us and
Jerry Mattison.
Mattison: I guess I will start. My name is Jerry Mattison. I'm the secretary-
treasurer of the Meridian Dairy and Stock Show, also known as the dairy board.
Bruijn: My name is Hans Bruijn, and I'm the president of the same organization.
And before we say anything else, and I'm proud to say that my daughter is a
teacher at Renaissance High School for the last couple years and it's good to see
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 9 of 99
all those great kids coming out of that school. Maybe she had just a little bit to do
with that.
Mattison: I guess the first thing we always like to do is thank the -- the City of
Meridian for their help and participation in putting on the annual Dairy Days shows
the past couple of years and that's why we are here again to ask for your continued
support of that event.
Bruijn: As you can see into paperwork, what we ask for is the support for the cost
of Specialty Construction to come and do all the traffic control to make sure that
the parade, once again, is a safe environment for everybody in the parade, as well
as all the bystanders and the cost as you see in this -- it's actually the same as last
year. However, after our last -- we had a meeting last week and Meridian Police
requested to have additional -- what they call tubular markers or the candle sticks
at each intersection that has a barricade, which is roughly about 20 of them. So,
that would be times -- so, that will be another 80 -- probably another 200 dollars is
what will be added onto the bill, because of the request of Meridian Police. So,
that's -- we are asking for support of those costs. Are there any questions?
De Weerd: Council, you have in front of you some information breaking down the
-- the various costs that are associated with the request. Do you have any
questions for Hans or Jerry? I guess just to -- to restate that the city has been a
partner to this long-standing tradition in our community. Certainly as part of the
safety aspect of -- of the parade we get large numbers and I would also say that
our -- our Dairy Board funds a lot of our youth programs as well, that this -- this
money that is generated from this annual event definitely is reinvested back into
our youth and youth programs. So, thank you for your -- your commitment to our
youth in our community as well and, Council, I will turn that over to you.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I believe what we have done in the past t hree years, whatever it's been, is
we just -- we have just said up to -- forgive up to 10,000 dollars I think it was and,
then, we just presented the bill and we paid whatever it was and that's -- so we --
I would make a motion, if it's agreeable, that we continue that way.
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: Question for Hans or Jerry. Mr. Bird said in the amount of 10,000, but
I'm seeing a quote here for 4,500 with your cost increase, having those
recommended by -- those are costs that --
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 10 of 99
Mattison: It is confusing, because, again, it's -- it's my understanding that an
ordinance was passed by Council several years ago that salary expense for
historic events is already covered. Bill can -- maybe you can confirm that.
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, that is correct. We did pass that,
so that there is no fee for the event, there is no -- there is no cost share that -- the
city, basically, provides the staff necessary for the park -- for the safety of the
citizens that come. So, really, the only hard cost is the security -- traffic controls
for the parade that I think is necessary for the Council's direction.
Mattison: I think the 10,000 that Keith was alluding to would include those salary
expenses for police, park or -- no?
Bird: Madam Mayor, when Charlie made that original motion when we passed the
ordinance and put this parade in the grandfathered rights, we didn't have any idea
what -- because we would have never -- we never had the parade in the existing
configuration, that it was going to be, because we didn't have a split corridor and
we had no idea what it was going to -- what the cost to cover the parade route was
going to be and so that's why Councilman Rountree took it up to nine, so we would
not run over and have to come back for a budget amendment or something like
that or the Dairy Show Board in -- asking for more. So, consequently, I think the
first year I think it was up to 4,800 or something -- our first bill was something like
that and that's all that's ever been paid. The wages had nothing to do with it.
De Weerd: So, a motion to cover the hard costs -- here it mentions 4,338 or 39,
plus that additional 200 should suffice. If -- if there are additional costs I think this
Council would be interested in knowing what they are.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: The 200 addition is just a guess. We have not got a new bid back and there
is -- we need to do -- on the return route the police felt we needed to beef up
security or stuff there, so we have no idea what the cost is going to be on that in
real detail.
Bruijn: Where I came up with the 200 dollars is roughly another 80 of those candles
at a buck seventy-five apiece, so it's a rough estimate, but we haven't heard back
from Specialty Construction yet.
De Weerd: But most likely it's not going to be in excess of over 5,000 dollars in
addition to what you have here.
Bruijn: I wouldn't think so.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 11 of 99
De Weerd: Well, I would hope not.
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: I understand that we have done things differently in the past, because we
didn't have a parade route and didn't know exactly what the costs were going to
be, but the way I see this we do have a parade route and we do know what the
costs are going to be, because we have a pretty firm bid here; correct? So, I would
move that we approve the hard costs of 4,500 dollars, which would cover the
additional 80 markers, plus this 4,338 pretty closely.
De Weerd: Amount of 4,600 --
Milam: Forty-six hundred.
De Weerd: Okay.
Milam: And the other -- any other bid?
De Weerd: So, the motion is --
Milam: The 4,600 dollars.
De Weerd: Do I have a second?
Cavener: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: So, if it runs into 47, 48 hundred, we are going to have a budget amendment
for a couple hundred bucks?
De Weerd: It's not that big of deal. But I think we would like to know what -- what
the cause was and certainly -- I think this -- this Council is committed to being a
full partner to this community event and we shouldn't have worries about justified
expenses to ensure the public safety. So, I --
Mattison: I appreciate that. And I would also mention the police estimated last
year's parade attendance of 30,000 people.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 12 of 99
De Weerd: If you're not going to the parade I would recommend avoiding
downtown. Any other questions? Okay. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: And while I have you here I would like to thank you for adding the
Meridian Youth Farmers Market as one of your events that you are engaged with.
They completed a successful year last year and it looks like they have some more
exciting new vendors this year -- almost most than we have canopies and tables
for. So, that is a good problem to have. But thank you for, again, this comm unity
event, continuing it and looking to expand it through engaging our youth. So, thank
you for being here tonight.
Mattison: Thank you for your support.
C. ACHD Chipseal Program
De Weerd: Okay. Item 9-C is under our ACHD chip seal program and, Tim, we -
- I will turn this over to you.
Nicholson: Thank you. Madam Mayor, Council Members, Tim Nicholson, Ada
County Highway District maintenance manager. It's my pleasure to be in front of
you tonight to discuss ACHD's plan for the fiscal year 2017 chip seal season and
brief you on that information. The last time I was in front of you we were in the
middle of Snowmageddon. So, 85 degrees out there today is welcome and I think
we are all looking forward to the summer, so -- so, why does ACHD chip seal. We
chip seal because it provides a maximum return on the taxpayers' dollars
investments in Ada County and it helps maintain our road infrastructure in a very
good overall PCI, that's pavement condition index rating. We also chip seal
because asphalt oxidizes and becomes hard and brittle, which causes cracking
and can eventually lead to failure in the road surfaces as water infiltrates and
penetrates into the sub base. We also -- chip sealing slows the oxidation process
down by sealing the road surface and creating a new wearing surface for the
traveling public. It also weatherproofs the road and prevents base failures. You
can see from our costs here that it costs us about 17 cents per square foot to do
our chip seal and a standard mill and overlay project is about ten times that
expense. So, there is a lot of bang for the buck here and it's a fast -moving
processes as well that doesn't inconvenience the public like a mill and overlay
project would. We anticipate spending approximately eight million dollars on the
overall chip seal process this whole summer. We have already started spending
a lot of that currently with our rock crushing. It will be about 25,000 team member
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 13 of 99
hours. Our totals, as you can see here, 550 lane miles, 7,000 tons of liquid asphalt,
57,000 tons of aggregate and about 43 working days, so some matrix there. A
little overview of the chip seal process. You can see from the picture here the truck
out in front here is a distributor truck. Well, I'm skipping ahead of myself a little bit.
First, one to three days ahead of the chip seal we will have our sweepers out in
front sweeping the roads clean and free of debris, followed up by our chip seal
process, which, again, includes a distributor truck here spraying oil down. The
amount of oil to be placed on the road depends on the road condition . We have
standard shot rates as we call them for oil application, but if the road is older and
more worn out, then, it may require a little bit more oil. That distributor truck is
immediately followed by the chip spreader that you can see here and that's what
spreads the chips on the road and the dump trucks back into the chipper box and
provide material to the chipper box. We have flaggers that are involved with this
whole process. We have flaggers out in front, alongside the chip seal train, and
behind the operation throughout the course of the process to keep both the
traveling public and our employees safe. After the chip seal we generally a llow
three to five days for the oil to cure on the roadway and , then, we will sweep up
the excess chips and follow that with a fog coat, which you can see being applied
here in this picture. The fog coat seals up the chips, penetrates down and helps
lock the chips into place, and also creates the nice black canvas for the new
roadway markings and striping. Our tentative schedule is listed here. We are
proposing a soft start of June 7th, this -- coming up here in the next couple weeks.
During that day we will have a training session for all of our operators and
personnel involved with that, including the flaggers and our temporary laborers.
We will get started later that afternoon. We will do calibration that day on
equipment and mobilize out. June 12th that following Monday is the official start
date to chipping. You can see over the July 4th holiday we plan on not chipping.
I think we have actually modified this a little bit as of yesterday morning and I didn't
update the slide, but we will be chipping the Thursday before the holiday. We are
going to take off Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and no chipping on those days.
Estimated to be completed late August and, then, have a little celebration for the
crew and everybody that was involved to help with th e process hopefully on
September 7th. Of course, these dates are all weather dependent. Last year we
had a pretty good year. I think we only missed about one day due to rain. So, we
are pretty fortunate in that respect. The year before the smoke in the fires that we
had impacted us quite a bit. If there is poor air quality we typically shut down as
to not adversely contribute to the air quality standard and also not to put our
workers out in harm's way as well, so -- here is a little overview map of our six
preventative maintenance zones. As you can tell we are going to be in zone six
here in the northwest quadrant of the county. Our outreach efforts to date are
shown here. We have been meeting with police representatives from both Ada
County Sheriff's Office and Meridian and Boise. We have presented this
information to our commission earlier this month and Boise City last week and as
I stand before you tonight my counterpart Tim Morgan was over at the City of Eagle
presenting the same information to them. We will follow up with Star the first week
in June. Losing my place. Going back to this map here real quickly. With our six
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 14 of 99
preventive maintenance zones we try to do all the arterials and collector streets.
So, all the major streets every six years. We also try to do half the residentials in
those zones during that six year period, too. So, residentials are effectively every
12 years. Arterials and collectors every six years. This is more a detailed --though
it's a little tough to see -- map of all the roads that we are planning to chip seal
within zone six. The green roads are residential roads that will get quarter inch
chips. The red roads are major arterial collector roads, which will get our 3/8ths
inch chips. The blue area denoted on the east side of the map is what our Adams
division will handle and the brown area on the west side and northern part of the
map is our Cloverdale division and I have handouts if you'd like them that I
distributed earlier to your clerk. This is our largest zone yet. Again, like I said, we
are going to do about 550 lane miles. Last year we did about 500 -- 480 or so.
So, this is -- this is a pretty ambitious plan and -- but we are up for the challenge
we believe. So, with that I would stand for any questions or comments that you
might have.
De Weerd: Thank you, Tim. Council, any questions?
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: Question -- maybe a comment and a question. First thanks -- I have
always been very curious about the chip seal program, so I'm glad we have got
some many of our citizens here that are able to learn a little bit about this as well.
While you're here I'm curious if I could get some feedback from you on street
sweeping. I know that's not the agenda item, but I know that you have had trucks
that have been out across the county. You referenced Snowmageddeon earlier. I
had some calls from a constituent this week sayings good news, the street
sweeper finally came through our neighborhood. They were a little miffed as to
why it took so long and I thought maybe there is some people that are in the
audience that may have some more questions and since you're a subject matter
expert I hope you might be able to provide a little context as to the timin g of why
we are not starting with the street sweepers.
Nicholson: Sure, Councilman Cavener. We put down approximately 20,000 tons
of sand over the course of Snowmageddon in the winter. That, as you can imagine,
takes quite a long time to pick up for a vehicle that travels at about four miles an
hour. Beings that we got in the residential streets this year we didn't typically sand
residential areas, unless it was in the foothills or in school routes. A lot of times
there was -- it was just basically a volume issue. Our sweeper crews normally
work Monday through Thursday. They have since -- since the weather cooperated
with this and temperatures were above freezing in March, that we started working
Fridays as well. So, we put in a lot of overtime with a lot of our folks and it just,
basically, was the effect of the winter that it took so long and this is really just the
first pass at everything. We have swept every road in the county in about ten
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 15 of 99
weeks and that's about what we anticipated it to take. It's just a volume number
and operators and equipment.
Cavener: Thank you. I appreciate hearing that.
Nicholson: Sure thing.
De Weerd: Any other questions from Council? We appreciate you coming and
sharing your schedule with us. I know that you have it posted on your website, so
that is something that we point our citizens to in case they have questions.
Nicholson: Thank you. Yeah. It's a good resource. There is a lot of information
on our website. If anybody has any questions you can p oint them in our direction
and we would be happy to answer them for them.
De Weerd: Great. Well, thank you, Tim. We appreciate you coming tonight.
Nicholson: Thank you, Mayor.
Item 10: Action Items
A. Continued from May 16, 2017: Final Plat for Bainbridge
Subdivision No. 5 (H-2017-0043) by Brighton
Investments, LLC Located Approximately 1/2 Mile South
of W. Chinden Boulevard and 1/4 Mile West of N. Ten
Mile Road
1. Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Twenty-Six
(26) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 7.56
Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning District
De Weerd: Okay. Item 10, under Action Items, our first item 10 -A is continued
from May 16th, a final plat on H-2017-0043. Sonya.
Allen: Excuse me, Madam Mayor. Just a moment. My computer went to sleep.
Madam Mayor, Council, the next item missed the Consent Agenda. The applicant
is in agreement. I can run through the staff report if you would like.
De Weerd: Is there agreement with the staff report?
Allen: Yes.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, do you have any questions?
Bird: I have none, Madam Mayor.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 16 of 99
De Weerd: Okay. If there are no questions on this final plat I would entertain a
motion.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve H-2017-0043 with staff and applicant comment.
Little Roberts: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 10 -A. Mr. Clerk, will
you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
B. Public Meeting for Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. 5
(H-2017-0060) by Schultz Development Located 635 E.
Vivid Sky Drive
1. Request: Vacate the Slope Easement on Lot 17,
Block 12 of Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. 5
De Weerd: 10-B is a public hearing for H-2017-0060. I will open the public hearing
with staff comments.
Allen: Madam Mayor, Council, the nature of this easement -- slope easement does
not require a public hearing. The applicant is in agreement with the staff report. If
you would like to move that along quickly, that's fine. If not, if you would like me to
go into the staff report I certainly can.
De Weerd: It's listed as a public hearing.
Allen: Okay. I will run through the staff report.
Coles: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes.
Coles: It is listed as a -- as a public meeting. There is a vacation --
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 17 of 99
De Weerd: A public meeting.
Coles: Public meeting. Vacation of easements doesn't require a public hearing.
However, this item did require it be addressed by Council through public meeting.
De Weerd: Is there anyone from our audience here to listen to this item or provide
comment? Oh, only you, Matt. Sorry. Council, would you like to have a
presentation or just have a brief summary? We could ask Matt if he has any
comment from the applicant.
Allen: Sure, Madam Mayor, I can give a brief summary.
De Weerd: Okay.
Allen: The applicant is requesting a vacation of a slope easement on Lot 17, Block
12, that was shown on the recorded plat for Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. 5.
This slope is entirely within the subject lot and vacation of such will not require the
adjustment of any existing public utility easements. In previous phases of this
development slope easements were shown on certain lots where the developer
planned to install homeowners association maintained grass on large slopes
between tiers of lots. In other locations private homeowners would maintain the
slope and easements where such weren't necessary. In those cases many
homeowners chose to modify the slope with the addition of retaining walls to
increase the usable yard and flat building area of the lot. The applicant states the
slope easement should not have been depicted on the plat for the subject lot. At
this location the slope is privately maintained . With approval of the proposed
easement vacation, the building homeowner will be allowed to modify the extent
of the slope with a rock retaining wall, subject to city building permit requirements
and setbacks. Staff did recommend approval of the requested vacation and Matt
Schultz submitted written testimony in agreement with the staff report. Staff will
stand for any questions.
De Weerd: Thank you. I appreciate that summary. Council, any questions for
staff?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Matt, do you have any comments? Thank you.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Seeing how this is a public meeting, I moved we close the public meeting, I
guess.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 18 of 99
Cavener: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public meeting. I know. I
think -- I have never seen a public meeting, just not a public hearing. So, this is
weird, but I have a motion and a second to close the public meeting. All those in
favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve H-2017-0060 and to include staff and applicant --
applicant comments.
Borton: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 10 -B. If there is no
discussion from Council, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
C. Public Hearing for Gyro Shack at Paramount (H-2017-
0059) by Jeff Likes Located 5038 N. Linder Road
1. Request: Council Review to Reduce the Required
Twenty-Five (25) Foot Landscape Buffer on the East
Property Boundary
De Weerd: 9-C is a public hearing for H-2017-0059. I will open the public hearing
with staff comment.
Beach: Good evening, Madam Mayor. Get to the slides. So, this -- a little history.
I did a hearing outline there. I did kind of an overkill and so I'd like to just explain
kind of the background on this and you should have a copy of the memo that's
written to Council from staff kind of explaining what the applicant is looking for on
this application. So, on April 6th of this year the Planning and Zoning Commission
approved a conditional use permit for a drive-thru for a restaurant that's within 300
feet of another drive-thru facility, both Dutch Bros and Sonic, and within 300 feet
of a residential use, the Linder Springs Apartments. So, if you -- Dutch Bros would
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 19 of 99
be here where my pointer is. Sonic is just to the south, I believe here, and the
Linder Springs Apartments are in this location here. The applicant requests City
Council review of the following condition of approval associated with the
conditional use permit. So, Condition 1.3E of that staff report reads a 25 foot wide
landscape buffer to the adjoining residential uses is required along the east side
of the site, along the backage road adjacent to the apartments in Linder Springs
as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3, planned in accord with the standards in 3-B
and C. The applicant proposes to install a six foot and a 17 foot three inch
landscape buffer at 19 feet and 84 feet offset from the existing drive aisle. A solid
fence and approximately five foot landscape buffer were installed as part of the
Linder Springs Apartment development and are adjacent to the east side of the
drive aisle. So, the applicant is proposing that instead of the required 25 feet along
this east side, that their landscape buffers they are installing as part of this project
be sufficient and I will also mention going back to this previous plan, that waivers
were granted both for Dutch Bros and for the Sonic Drive -In facility as well. With
that staff is recommending approval and I will stand for any questions.
De Weerd: Josh, on the Sonic and Dutch Bros, were those waived because they
were in before the apartments? What came first? The apartments?
Beach: The apartments were there first.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions? Okay. Is the applicant here? Please
state your name and address for the record.
Likes: Jeff Likes. 1119 East State Street, Eagle, Idaho.
De Weerd: Thank you for joining us.
Likes: I don't have a lot to say, except for the fact that the other two developments
that we have along this property have not had to do the required 25 foot landscape
setback and we have provided quite a bit of setback in there. Our drive -thru is
along the street and the apartment complex does have their six foot fence and their
five foot landscape island on our west side -- or on our east side. I will take any
questions that you may have of anything.
De Weerd: Council, any questions for the applicant?
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: Sorry. Could you articulate to us why you're requesting the proposed
change from the 25 foot? I heard because the others weren't asked, but I didn't
want to put words in your mouth.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 20 of 99
Likes: Well, requesting that -- we are requesting the change because -- due to --
there is already a drive aisle in between us and the existing apartment complex .
They do have a six foot fence. They do have a landscape buffer. We are providing
further landscape buffers mixed in with our parking before our drive-thru on -- well,
this is the slide, Josh. Are they are on the same slide we are?
Beach: Yeah. Everyone is -- yeah.
Likes: As you can see the apartment complex is over there to the existing
development and our -- our project is all the way to the west of that.
Beach: I apologize.
Likes: There you go.
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: Jeff -- Jeff, I'm sorry. I guess I still -- either I'm -- it's not connecting with
me or I'm not hearing you correctly. Typically when somebody comes before us
and they are asking for a change, they articulate to us the reason why and I guess
I haven't heard the reason why.
Likes: The reason we are requested the landscape variance --
Cavener: Uh-huh.
Likes: -- basically --
Cavener: Yes, sir.
Likes: -- is the existing development has not done it. So, in keeping with the
standards of what's already been developed , we have pushed our building to
Linder and, then, provided parking similar to what's already existing in the
surrounding developments north and south of us. Dutch Bros, Sonic to the south,
there is the orthodontist development next just directly to the south of us and an
extra 25 foot of landscaping isn't going to do a lot from what's already been done
today. There you go. You can kind of see a little better there on what's -- on what's
been developed currently up and down that access road.
De Weerd: Council, any other questions? Thank you.
Likes: No problem.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 21 of 99
De Weerd: Okay. This is a public hearing. Is there anyone who wishes to provide
testimony on this application? Okay. Council?
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: Madam Mayor. I move that we close the public hearing on Item 10-C, H-
2017-0059.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and the second to close the public hearing on Item 10-
C. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: I would move that we approve Item 10-C, H-2017-0059, using the modified
language in the conditions of approval for the CUP, Section 1.3B, as in boy, as
proposed by the applicant.
Palmer: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and second to approve Item 10-C as stated. Any
discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, nay; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: The ayes have it.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE NAY.
D. Public Hearing for Goddard Creek (H-2017-0007) by
Brian Porter Located 2780 W. McMillan Road
1. Request: Rezone of 12.38 Acres of Land from R-4 to
the R-40 (5 Acres) and the C-C (7.38 Acres) Zoning
Districts
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 22 of 99
2. Request: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Map to Change the Land Use
Designation on 12.38 Acres of Land from Office
and High Density Residential to Mixed-Use
Community
3. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Self-Storage
Facility Consisting of Ten (10) Buildings on
Approximately 7.38 Acres of Land in the Proposed
C-C Zoning District
4. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Multi-Family
Development Consisting of Eighty-Two (82) Dwelling
Units in the Proposed R-40 Zoning District on Five (5)
Acres of Land
5. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of
Twenty-Two (22) Building Lots, and Five (5) Common
Lots on 12.38 Acres of Land in the Proposed C-C and
R-40 Zoning Districts
6. Request: Amendment to an Existing Development
Agreement (Lochsa Falls Inst. #103012598) to
Update the Development Plan for this Site from Office
to Multi-Family and Self Storage
De Weerd: Item 10-D is a public hearing for H-2017-0007. I will open this public
hearing with staff comment.
Beach: Very good, Madam Mayor. This application is for quite a few sub
applications, so this is for a Comprehensive Plan map amendment, conditional use
permit for a multi-family development, an R-40 rezoning district, a conditional use
permit for a self-storage facility in a C-C zoning district, a rezone, a preliminary plat
and a development agreement modification . So, the subject property consists of
approximately 12.38 acres of land, which is currently zoned R-4 and located at
2780 West McMillan Road. To the north are the Selway Apartments, which are
zoned R-4. To the east is residential property zoned L-O. To the south is West
McMillan Road and single family homes in the R-4 and R-8 and RUT zoning
districts. And to the west is vacant commercial property zoned L-O. This property
was granted annexation, preliminary plat, and a conditional use permit as part of
the Lochsa Falls Subdivision in 2002. It has a development agreement on the
property currently. The conditional use permit allows for 11 office buildings to be
built within the R-4 zoning district and the subject property is one such property
selected to have office uses. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map
designation for the property is split, with high density residential and office. So,
the summary of the request for a rezone, the applicant requests approval to rezone
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 23 of 99
12.38 acres of land from R-4 to R-40, with approximately five acres and from R-4
to C-C of approximately 7.38 acres, which are consistent with the future land map
designation of the mixed use community. There is a development agreement
modification to the existing development agreement. It is requested to remove the
property from the existing development agreement and to enter into a new
development agreement with the associated concept plans and elevations . The
applicant proposes a -- so, this is the proposal for the Comprehensive Plan as I
said previously. High density residential and office with the split there on the north
and, then, proposing to change it to mixed use community. The preliminary plat
proposed for the project consists of 22 residential lots, one commercial lot and five
common lots on 12.38 acres of land in a proposed C-C and R-40 zoning districts.
Access to streets is required to comply with the standards of the UDC. The
applicant is requesting a Council wavier to allow for direct access to West McMillan
Road for the storage portion of the project. ACHD has approved the proposed
access point. The proposed plat depicts access for the multi-family portion of the
project via West Apgar Creek Lane, which is located approximately here where my
mouse is there. Minimum of ten percent of the multi-family portion of the site is
required to consist with qualified -- qualified open space in accord with the
standards in the UDC. A total of 1.56 acres of qualified open space is proposed.
The applicant has proposed to include several amenities, including bike storage,
a 50-by-100 foot play field, a community garden with six rentable raised beds,
walking trails, and a playground facility with an adjacent shelter seating area, which
will comply with the UDC standards as far as the amenities are concerned. Moving
onto the first conditional use permit, a conditional use permit is requested for the
multi-family portion of the project. The proposal consists of 82 dwelling units,
which consists of 12 townhouse buildings, each unit containing two to three
bedrooms. The applicant is required to comply with the specific use standards set
forth in the UDC for multi-family developments. Moving onto the self-storage
portion. There is a conditional use permit required for self-storage in the C-C
zoning district. There are some specific use standards for self-storage within the
UDC that the applicant is required to comply with . The multi-family plan depicts a
total of 205 parking spaces, 94 enclosed garages, and 94 parking pads in front of
garages. Both of these projects are required to apply for and obtain certificate of
zoning compliance and the design review. The multi-family portion -- they have
submitted some elevations for those that will be included in the proposed
development agreement. A little summary of the Planning and Zoning
Commission. This was seen by the Planning and Zoning Commission at March
16th and April 20th of this year. Summary of that -- I guess just to back up.
Planning and Zoning Commission in their first hearing requested that they make
some changes to their plan and they did so for the April 20th and on April 20th the
Planning and Zoning Commission did recommend denial of the project. Summary
of the hearing. Shon Parks, James Doolin, and John Carpenter were in favor. In
opposition were -- and commenting were a large number of individuals. Happy to
name them if -- if requested, but there is a long list. Staff -- presenting the
application was myself. Bill Parsons also commented. Key issues of public
testimony were concerns over the proposed number of parking spaces for the
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 24 of 99
development. The neighbors did not see the number of spaces as being adequate
for the development. Concerns over the amount of traffic in Goddard Creek and
how this project will increase the traffic coming out of the Selway Apartments,
which also uses Apgar Creek Lane as their access. Concerns that the
Comprehensive Plan amendment would be extremely damaging to surrounding
residents. Concerns that the current residents that purchased their homes with
the knowledge that this area would be developed in accord with the current
Comprehensive Plan. Concerns that the project wasn't noticed properly. The
issues of discussion by the Commission were design of the open space and the
number of amenities proposed. Performance with the existing Comprehensive
Plan and the existing development agreement, which proposed a certain number
of apartment units for the development agreement, of which almost the entire --
the entire number were included in the number of apartments in the Selway
Apartment community. Concerns over traffic in the area with access parking in
location at the entrance to the multi-family project. Concerns about the large
number of apartments that would be in the area if this were approved. Commission
changes to staff recommendation. The Commission voted to deny the subject
application based on maintaining the integrity of the current development
agreement. With that staff will stand for any questions you have.
De Weerd: Council, any questions at this point?
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: Just one quick question for Josh. Can you maybe go a little deeper into
the -- what the concerns were that the project wasn't properly noticed?
Beach: Sure. There was several concerns that neighbors did not receive -- this
was -- all happened about the same time as the previous mentioned
Snowmageddon, I guess we are calling it, that happened this year. There were
concerns that maybe due to that some of the surrounding residents did not receive
a notice. We have numerous times and during our Planning and Zoning
Commission reviewed those folks that we sent that notice to and they were -- as
far as our records are concerned we sent notices to those folks. It was signed
according to the posted -- the signs on the site were where they should be, so we
reviewed that at length.
Cavener: Great. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions at this point? Okay. Is the applicant here
this evening? Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for
the record.
Seel: Yes. It's Jonathan Seel. 2906 Haven, Eagle.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 25 of 99
De Weerd: Thank you.
Seel: Good evening, Madam Mayor, Council Members. First I might mention to
you -- and some of you are already aware. I worked for Winston Moore for 18
years and one of the things that I learned with Winston is that he keeps a high
standard of quality with his projects and the reason I'm here in part tonight is
because Mr. Moore is currently with Mr. -- working with Mr. Doolin on a project
potentially at Center Point Marketplace and the reason he's doing it is because --
not that he has to do it, he's in that nice position that some of us wish we were in,
but because he's impressed with the quality, the design, the thoroughness of it and
also the character of the developer. So, I'm not suggesting tonight that I mentioned
and you should just accept that or Winston Moore like -- that you're going to like it
and you're going to approve it, but simply that, hopefully, that -- that shines
somewhat of a positive light maybe on this project. I know in the last couple
Planning and Zoning -- or Planning and Zoning Commission hearings some of the
residents stood up and expressed concerns and there was also letters and what I
would like to do first is, hopefully, address those -- address those that they might
have concerns on your part and maybe, hopefully, I might alleviate some of the
concerns of the residents. One of the things that I found was interesting -- in the
HOA letter from the president, it mentions in there for profit rental business have
only a profit mode. I don't know about anybody else, but I am motivated by profit.
I think we are all. But I think if we step back for a minute between the first P&Z
hearing and the second one, Mr. Doolin -- Goldman. Sorry, I keep wanting to
pronounce his name wrong -- reduced the number of units from 82 to 74. He also
reduced -- increased the parking from 202 to 205. Now, that doesn't sound like a
lot, but when you think that you have reduced the number of units, that number --
it's increasing. So, in other words, in going from a 2.5, he funded 2.77. He still
exceeding the required limit. He adjusted the access off of Apgar from 80 feet to
220 feet back to address the stacking units. He increased the amenities to five
and, again, with 75 -- 72 units in this case, he's only required to have four
amenities, but he has the garden, he has the open area --
De Weerd: Jonathan, will you --
Seel: I can hear myself. Use the microphone on that side.
Coles: Madam Mayor, we have two microphone posts there, but one isn't working,
so it's the only one we have at the moment.
De Weerd: Oh.
Coles: We will have a second working microphone post in a couple of weeks.
Seel: Anyways, I will try to do that. He's got the community gardens, the internal
walking paths, the open areas, the playgrounds, the bike storage. He's also
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 26 of 99
increased the open area to 1.36 acres, which is 124 percent of the open area. So,
yes, there might be a suggestion that he's motivated by profit, but I think what Mr.
Doolin has demonstrated here -- he listened to the condition, he listened to the
residents and he tried to adjust his development to satisfy their concerns. You
know, we all recognize that compromise -- most people walk away from the table
and nobody's happy, but that's -- that's a definition of compromise. But I think here
he's not a one trick pony. He intends to do future developments within the City of
Meridian. Obviously Center Point and others. So, he wants to take in
consideration the concerns of the neighbors to try to adjust them and also to the
city and staff. So, I think he's done a fair job at that and I think it reflects that he
as a developer is a quality -- and also a quality project. Another one that came up
in here -- I know some of the residents mentioned that they bought this property
-- their property, the residents, in part because this is L-O zoned. It's interesting -
- and I have been in front of you before on the same thing. As a developer you try
to put together a concept plan of what you think -- the city says I want a concept
plan and so you put together what you envision it to be at that time , but things
change, sectors change, maybe this office market is not as hot as this, or the
residential or what have you and so the city I think recognizes that also , because
they give us the opportunity to come back to you to modify -- whether it's a comp
plan, it's a DA or many of the other applications. You can't simply force a developer
to say this is what you got to build and if you build it they will come. So, you have
the option of either building things that potentially will not be occupied or you have
vacant land sitting out there and I think the vision of the City of Meridian is to want
to continue to grow in a quality way. It also mentions in here that -- that the current
office market -- if you talk about that, the L-O zone, this is where we get back to
the fact of how the market is changing. All you have got to do is drive up and down
many of those streets, including the land directly to the west of this project. It's
zoned L-O and it's been vacant. What I'd like to do is just take a moment -- I have
got a couple of letters here, one from Mark Bottles that has done resident-office in
the area and I will just read it very briefly. He said basically the market has
changed significantly -- this is with L-O. Office. Significant driving this property
tight and the demand has shrunk considerably. The inventory created through the
mid-2000 boom still hasn't been absorbed and many projects have been brought
even more inventory to the market of late date. To require -- under this
development agreement for the city to require this, all you're doing is exacerbating
what is already a problem. There is also a letter here from Dave Evans and they
have a property over at Meridian and Ustick. It's currently 60 percent built, but
since 2006 it's had zero activity. If you go up to Ten Mile you can see all kinds of
signs. Let me remind you it's not just L -O, it's the L-O and it could also be
commercial, which can be office. There is simply not the demand for it, but there
is demand for other uses. So, I will mention that. Also we have mentioned that --
that ACHD's requirement -- let's assume for the moment it is office, okay? It stays
office. There may be a misunderstanding on the part of the residents that all the
traffic is going to go out to McMillan. That's not the case. ACHD's policy is, yes,
you will go out to McMillan, but you will also have access to a lesser functioning
street. The thinking for there is -- is so that maybe the surrounding community
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 27 of 99
can, then, use that local street to get to this office, which, of course, could very well
be used by other people. So, it's not going to eliminate the access simply to drive
it all the way out to McMillan. I think also there is a -- there is a perception out
there that office is going to be less intrusive. If you think about in the L-O zone
you're allowed to operate from 6:00 o'clock in the morning until 10:00 o'clock at
night. Okay? There is many uses in there, but some of the uses, for example, are
private and public education, daycare, healthcare, or social services. There is a
possibility -- I'm not saying it's an absolute, but there is a possibility that there could
be businesses that are open verily early in the morning or could be open up very
late at night. Also you're going to -- you have parking lots as we all know and
parking lots have lights and, yes, you want to drive those parking lot lights down,
but they are still going to be visible. So, there is going to be an impact there. I
think the other thing is -- in there is the fact that even Meridian -- staff has brought
this up and you probably have directed this in the past. The desire within the city
is to go from a less intensive use to a more intensive use. If you look at this project
you have on the east side of Goddard you have single family. If this project goes
through you have what -- they call them multi-family and I -- I have an issue with
that, but I will get to that later. Then you have self-storage, then you have L-O,
then you have commercial. You have that nice transition of intensity, which is what
the city wants. So, I think that's an important consideration here, too. I know some
of the people talked about the fact that they don't want to access of Apgar, but staff
has said that they -- this is where they want access. I have also talked to ACHD,
Christy Little over there. Their position as staff at ACHD is we want access off
Apgar and the only way that you will be able to potentially achieve it is going -- to
get it off McMillan is go in front of the Ada county commissioners and we as staff
are going to oppose it. I may not be the smartest person in the room, but I can
generally tell when I'm climbing uphill on something and I think that's it. There was
a discussion about school overcrowding. There is actually a letter in here that talks
about the fact that the lower schools, the middle schools, are basically near
capacity and yet the high school is over capacity. But I would also mention there
in the staff report that Ada county -- or Ada West did not send any comments back.
In other words, they did not have any concerns and the applicant actually
contacted them and expressed no concerns about that . They are going to have a
middle school open in 2018 and they are planning for a high school in the future.
The bottom line is schools, as we all know -- I have been faced with it, you have
been faced with it -- Ada West is always just a half step behind where -- the idea
of they are supposed to be and why is that? That's a result of growth. That's
something we all deal with. We know like clockwork we are going to get a notice
saying there is a bond election at some point in time. Park access was another
issue that was brought up in here. The neighbors in the surrounding community
were concerned that -- that this project was going to use their park. It's a private
park. I can understand that. But again -- if we can bring up the site plan, Josh.
The colored one, please.
Beach: I don't have a colored one here.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 28 of 99
Seel: No? Okay. Well, go back to the black and white. I always like color, so --
okay. In this one, as we mentioned, we have open areas, we have a playground,
we have community gardens, we have a sitting area, we have walk paths, and
more than a fair amount of open area. This will give these people the incentive to
stay here. But I also will mention that within the City of Meridian over here you
currently have got 19 parks with like 240 acres, with more planned, and, by the
way, this development will also be contributing with park impact fees to that. So, I
think the residents in here have a myriad of options to select from if they do choose
to park. Traffic. And I guess if this is all you have it didn't get there. The traffic
engineer could talk a little bit about it, but we have something here. There was a
traffic report put out by the Meridian Police Department. Since 2011 there has
been three -- and we can provide this documentation to you -- three accidents at
Goddard and McMillan and they have been property damage ones. No fatalities.
No injuries. Now, someone might say, well, okay, maybe not all the damage ones
have been reported and that may be the case and I can't argue that one. But
certainly if it was a fatality or it's an injury, I got to believe that it would be reported.
Also Ada County Highway District did not require a traffic study here. If they have
concerns with traffic they do require that. They did not see any concern with traffic
at the intersection. And I'm going to have -- at the end I'm going to have -- well, I
guess I should step back. Some of the residents also said, hey, we would like to
see a traffic study. Well, the applicant has done us a traffic study and the traffic
engineer, after I get done, will get up and talk about that and address I think in
more detail what I don't always understand. But let me get to what I think is the
key thing here.
De Weerd: You need to speak into the microphone.
Seel: Oh. Sorry. I think the key thing here is the fact that this is called multi-family
and rental and I think that's the rub. As you may recall for some of you, I came in
front of you with Redtail Apartments, Iuxury apartments here several years ago.
Submitted that and also came in -- in front of you with the park impact fee
ordinance. I don't know if I should mention that or not, but, anyway, in doing that
research and something and also observing with Redtail Apartments over there at
Victory and Meridian, what we saw is there is a paradigm shift in the thinking of
people. You know, there was a time when -- when I think most of us wanted to do
is -- as soon as possible buy a single family home. We didn't care what it looked
like, as long as we got that. That was the key thing. But what we are seeing is we
are seeing a transition. I'm not seeing this ground swell, but what you're seeing is
people are saying, no, I don't want that single family home. You know, I want the
flexibility to be able to move quickly. I don't want the maintenance. Maybe I don't
want a mortgage. I don't want to be saddled with ill-liquid asset. Right now it's
great, but we all remember 2006. Maybe they retired and they want to pull their
equity out. But the point is they want to have a nice residence that they can go to,
you know. They want something that -- that will mirror maybe -- maybe a single
family home and I think this project will do that. There was comments about -- and
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 29 of 99
I can pass this one out. There was comments about crime in the area. Crime and
vandalism that would -- that would cause --
De Weerd: If you want to give it to the clerk he will make sure --
Seel: Oh. Sure. If you look at the police reports for Selway Apartments and you
look at the police -- also the police report for the surrounding community, on a
yearly basis the amount of police calls for the surrounding subdivision was .83 per
unit per year. For Selway it was .92. I don't see that as an overly material
difference in there in any way -- yeah. I'd like to say that. That's the research from
them, so -- so, I think what I would say is from a purely technical standpoint , yes,
you could -- you could define this as multi-family, but I really question that it's truly
multi-family. In fact, one of the Planning and Zoning Commissioners made the
comment -- he says this is not typical multi-family. To me multi-family is one above,
one below, one to the left, one to the right. In this particular case -- can we show
the elevations, please? And I'm sorry they are not color for you. Maybe we got
color. Yeah. We got color. Okay. Right here. Look at that and tell me does that
-- when you look at that does that say to you multi-family? To me this is residential.
This is single family. These buildings were not attached. They would be single
family. These buildings are fifteen to eighteen hundred square feet. By the way,
Selway -- Selway Apartments are three bedroom, two bath, 1,150 square feet. So,
you got -- you got a different thing here. They all have three bedrooms, two and a
half baths. The three story with the one car garage with parking in front. The two
story is a two garage with parking in front. Okay? The -- the rent on these runs
from 1,300 to 1,450 dollars --
De Weerd: Jonathan, your time has just run out.
Seel: Okay. I'm -- I'm almost done.
De Weerd: You need to summarize.
Seel: Okay. Yes. Thirteen hundred to 1,450 dollars a month. I think that's a pretty
fair house payment. I'd also mention -- and here is the critical thing that I want to
emphasize. There is strict CC&Rs in here, which is --
De Weerd: Jonathan, you need to summarize.
Seel: Okay. This is a really critical part, Mayor, I can -- I will finish really quick.
De Weerd: But your time is up.
Seel: Okay. But could -- if I could do just this and, then, that will be. This is an
important part. Please.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 30 of 99
De Weerd: You can wrap that into your -- your final remarks as well, but your time
is expired.
Seel: Okay. So, I --
De Weerd: So, you can bring that up at a later point.
Seel: Okay.
Palmer: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Palmer.
Palmer: There are a ton of deep points kind of going into this project that I think
the typical 15 minutes and with the applicant's efficiency in addressing a lot of the
issues, I would love to at least award him another three to five minutes, instead of
--
Seel: Three minutes and I'm done.
De Weerd: Well, as I understand it, he has other people talking about this
application, too, and they only have three minutes each, so --
Seel: I will take one of theirs then. How is that?
De Weerd: If Council would like to -- to hear his final comment, I -- I will cede to
your direction.
Borton: Sure.
Bird: Go ahead, Mayor.
Seel: All right. This is it. I think this is very critical and this is why I want to
emphasize this. There is strict CC&Rs in this project. There are 35 pages of it.
They address the fact that there is a property management office, that there is an
ongoing maintenance fee, both initially and to support ongoing maintenance, as
well as current maintenance and it's also very strict about the outside and literally
everything on the outside of these buildings has to be maintained by the
association. That is the walls, the roof, the driveways, the garage doors,
everything. So, when you walk through one of these projects, you know, you're
not going to look at it and say this is a rental, okay? It's going to be strictly
controlled and so I think that's important and, hopefully, that's important to the
residents of the surrounding community. So, the bottom line -- and I'm done -- you
have got -- this is another option for the community. You have got the single family,
you have got the multi-family here, and now you've got something that's in between
and I think if you go through your comp plan and vetting your stuff, that's what the
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 31 of 99
City of Meridian is trying to encourage, they have other options for housing and
this provides it. Thank you. I will stand for questions.
De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions?
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: Jonathan, based on some comments that you just made, are these four-
plexes to be individually sold to separate owners? Is that -- am I correct on that?
Seel: Madam Mayor, Council Woman Milam, no. Each unit -- when I say that,
there is like four of them in there. That whole thing will be sold. So, it's not
individual.
Milam: Right. But each building --
Seel: Each cluster, for lack of a better word. Yes. Yes.
Milam: Thank you.
Seel: And keep in mind, that they have got -- they have got an incentive there,
too, to maintain that and it's quality, it's an investment for them, so --
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: Jon, since your presentation you -- you talked earlier about listening to
some of the residents' concerns and reducing the amount of these clusters -- I
think is the term you used -- from 82 -- at one point you said 74 and they said
72 --
Seel: Seventy-two. If I did I'm sorry, too. Eighty-four to 72. My correction. I'm
sorry. I'm sorry.
Cavener: All right. So, 74 or 72. Seventy-four. Okay. Thank you. Madam Mayor,
an additional question. Jon, I appreciate your referencing Redhawk on Victory and
Meridian. I think that development is the gold standard for multi-family in Meridian.
It's spread out. It's not large structures. I think it adheres well to our community
and so with you referencing that I'm curious if you could share with me some
comparisons and things that I would see in this proposed development that I
currently find in that other development on Meridian and Victory.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 32 of 99
Seel: Yes. Madam Mayor, Council Members, if you -- if you look at Redtail
Apartments, for one thing, it's running approximately 105 percent occupancy.
Now, you say wait a minute, how can it be 105 percent, there is only a hundred
percent of the space. Because they have a waiting list in there. But because they
put the quality into the interiors. I was involved in the construction, too. It's also
the amenities. In other words, again, it's encouraging people with a pool, with the
clubhouse, with a variety of things that encourages the people to stay there. In
other words, instead of getting on the road, which I know you like to keep people
from traveling any more than necessary, it is also a -- of a quality level that -- that
attracts the type of people I have talked to that don't want that single family home
or don't want that flexibility of it. This is -- to me is another continuation of that. It's
a step up in quality. So, I don't know if I have answered the question or not.
Cavener: Madam Mayor, follow up if I may. I guess I want to drill a little deeper,
because I didn't see a clubhouse or pool in the proposed development that's before
us tonight, which you referenced. So, maybe, then, you could talk -- is it -- the
word luxury gets thrown around a lot and it's an arbitrary term --
Seel: Yes.
Cavener: -- and I like specifics and so when you say luxury rental, what specifically
makes this rental a luxury item?
Seel: Well, Madam Mayor, Council Members, I think what this says -- one thing
you have to step back and realize -- when you looked at -- at Redtail Apartments,
that was like 40 acres. This is like five. There was 360 units in there. So, they
are going to add a certain amount of other amenities that -- that this one just can't
simply justify, nor you couldn't put a pool in. You couldn't put a large clubhouse in.
I mean you could, but what do you have left. But what I'm trying to drive at is that
the residents -- the residence itself -- I said in this particular case I think represents
the quality of a single family home. It's three bedrooms. It's 15 to 18 hundred
square feet. It's garage. So, it offers those type of things that if you wanted a
single family home, but you didn't want that, what I was trying to drive by with the
luxury is -- is that there is a paradigm shift away from everybody wanting to own a
single family home, but people wanting rental, but wanting a quality rental, you
know, and they don't want to have to just go and get a simple, you know, apartment
building with four walls and just a cheap, simple construction. So, I think that's the
difference I'm trying to drive home.
Cavener: Madam Mayor, Jonathan, you know, I appreciate you and Winston
Moore, I think you guys have a strong track record and so I guess I will give you
one more shot to maybe articulate -- we have a lot of developments that have
garages and four walls and multi-story. Some are great and, boy, some I think the
developers wish they had a do over on. So, I think in terms of trying to listen to
some of the citizen's concerns, which I applaud you for doing earlier in your
testimony, I guess I just want to give you one more opportunity to articulate to me,
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 33 of 99
who is not a developer, I'm John Q. Citizen. Explain to me why you market this as
a luxury item and, again, with your referencing Redtail as also -- that's my
barometer. Really, can you share with me what makes this development so similar
to that, besides they have got a garage and a pool?
Seel: Madam Mayor, Council Member, I think we are getting hung up with the
luxury. What I was trying to drive home -- I'm not implying that this is some type
of luxury building, okay? What I am saying is is that there is that paradigm shift,
like we saw at Redtail where people want something that is nicer than your
prototypical apartment building that we have seen over the years. What this is --
what I'm saying is if you look at the quality of this, you know, with the architecture,
the design, the amenities they do have -- and they can't compete against a 40 acre
development -- that I think it's a quality development and my -- if I suggested to
you that this is luxury, no, no. What I'm saying is that this a quality, that this is
another option out there that's available. So, maybe that's where we are having a
challenge as far as communicating and, if so, I apologize for that.
Cavener: I appreciate that. Thank you.
De Weerd: Any further questions from Council at this point? Thank you, Jonathan.
Seel: Thank you. And I apologize for the delay. Appreciate your patience.
De Weerd: Thank you. I will go to the sign-up sheet.
Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. David Valasquez signed up against. Does not
wish to testify. Richard and Diane Hurdigan signed up against and does not wish
to testify. Reed Jones signed up against. There was no indication of testimony.
Jonathan Forsythe signed up against. No indication of testimony. Don --
De Weerd: So, when you hear your name if you didn't sign up to testify, if you want
to, please, let us know at that time when your name is read. Okay. Thank you,
Mr. Clerk.
Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Don Fleck signed up against and wishes to
testify.
De Weerd: Good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you, please, state your
name and address for the record.
Fleck: Don Fleck. I live at 5197 North Blackstead Avenue.
De Weerd: And, Don, can you pull that microphone up a little bit. Thank you.
Fleck: Okay. As a long time resident in the community there I was -- through the
process of the building of the Selway Apartments and the commitment was
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 34 of 99
reaffirmed to the community at that point in time that 171 units would be the
variance that was allowed in the initial planning for that community. That was done
for the Selway Apartments. So, the commitment, then, falls back on the City
Council to honor that previous commitment that was made then . Now, I have no
objection to a storage unit being there. What I have a problem with is we have 171
units with traffic from that and now you add onto that another 74'ish units that the
number seems to change, as well as the picture seemed to change as well. So, I
have seen an advertisement for this particular unit, you know, marketed. That's
not the picture that I see there. So, I'm not sure what's real for this development I
know when you look at the -- the overhead view of what they are planning, it doesn't
look like any other different multiple family designated development. If this is to be
residential, make it R-4 as it's already platted to be. There is plenty of demand for
R-4 residential units out there already. You can strike the development as office
space, that would be fine. They can even build the whole thing in storage. I don't
think the residents there would have much problem with that either. Not that much
traffic involved in that kind of business. They mentioned a traffic study that they
had done, you know, and these studies are interesting, because you can show
many things with numbers. You can show minimums. You can show maximums.
And I looked through the summary that they gave and it appeared that they were
showing minimums and not including the Selway Apartments in their study of the
amount of traffic that's going go out on that -- on that street. In particular Apgar.
As a resident of that area I typically avoid going out on Goddard Creek because of
the traffic, especially in the morning and in the evening, because it does back up
there and I had -- I can't talk about what is on Apgar, but I know if I am avoiding it
-- in fact, I have driven down Apgar myself to avoid the back up of traffic on
McMillan there. So, I guess my main point is we have a large number of
apartments in there now. I have nothing against apartments. I'm a real estate
investor myself. But these people that are buying and trying to build this section,
they don't live there. I don't even know if they live in the state. It doesn't matter to
me.
De Weerd: Mr. Fleck, can you summarize, please.
Fleck: Yes, I will.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Fleck: Thank you very much. And I would just ask that you honor the commitment
to the citizens that live in this community to the multi-family units that were there
and not to add anymore high density residential components to that community.
Thank you very much.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: Sherry Fleck signed up against. Does not wish to testify. Dan Fisher
signed up against and wishes to testify.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 35 of 99
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: First before you provide testimony, I need to do this before Mr. Fleck
came up. On this application I have been contacted by residents both in favor and
against, sharing their opinions with me, both via phone call and e-mail. With each
contact I informed them that as a City Council Member we are not allowed to
provide any commentary while not on the record, but that I had to acknowledge
and receive their feedback. But it's important to disclose that as we move into the
public hearing process tonight.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Fisher: Good evening, City Council. This is my first opportunity to see you all. I'm
very impressed with the work that's been done tonight. First of all, I'd like to start
off --
De Weerd: Can you, please --
Fisher: Oh, sorry.
De Weerd: -- start with your name and address.
Fisher: Dan Fisher. 2382 West Apgar Creek Drive.
De Weerd: Thank you, Dan.
Fisher: All right. Thank you. The Lochsa Falls development agreement of January
2nd, 2003, states clearly the maximum 171 multi-family units would be developed
on this site. The home purchasers, myself included in the Lochsa Falls
Subdivision, purchased their homes in good faith on what would be developed on
the property. The Meridian Comprehensive Plan calls for suburban office to be
developed on the property and this was reaffirmed -- I believe the Comprehensive
Plan was reaffirmed in 2016 that this is the -- the plan, the vision for our city. I
think that putting 74 -- 74 units -- but if you have three people per family that's a lot
of human beings stacked like sardine cans in kind of a stairwell style apartment on
five acres of land. That's just as -- that's absolutely -- that's pretty crazy, in my
opinion. I think that there are a lot -- there are other properties in the City of
Meridian that would be well suited to this development . I think the -- the exteriors
of the buildings are very nice, but there is plenty of other spaces within the city
where this would be a good fit and not such a tight fit with all the -- the different
access points. But I would just like you to remember to go back to the vision for
our city and what we -- as we develop the Comprehensive Plan what we would put
there and, again, please, honor the development agreement that was signed with
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 36 of 99
Lochsa Falls in 2003. That's all I have to say and thank you very much for your
time.
De Weerd: Thank you for coming.
Coles: Penny Fisher signed up against, with no indication of testimony.
De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and
address for the record.
P.Fisher: My name is Penny Fisher. I live at 2382 West Apgar Creek. My home
is the corner lot on Apgar and Goddard, so I will be seeing this if it is approved.
One of the things I want to address today is -- I'm not going to talk about traffic, I'm
not going to talk about overcrowding. The fact of the matter is they have the
Selway Apartments, 171 units, the Comprehensive Plan that was approved. It was
my understanding that this -- the apartments, as well as the storage units, were
together in one application, because they needed the zero traffic with the proposed
storage units to fit into the -- I guess the formula for traffic. If you just took the
apartment itself without that zero, it was too high. That was our understanding.
One of the things I was there at the meetings with the zoning and planning , they
did agree that the units are beautiful and they would have -- I'm not sure exactly
who said it, but they did agree that it would be better suited for somewhere else
and that was the reason why they -- they disapproved it was because of the high
density and they also did not feel that it was the best thing to go against the prior
commitment that -- in 2003. So, for these reasons I do wish for you guys to decline
and disapprove this property. Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you, Penny.
Coles: Bill Wade signed up against and wishes to testify.
De Weerd: Thank you for being here tonight. If you will, please, state your name
and address for the record.
Wade: This might be a little difficult for me, since -- my name is Bill Wade. I live
at 2244 West Apgar Creek Drive.
De Weerd: Thank you, Bill.
Wade: Thank you. I'm going to just read, because I sort of prepared this and it
will keep me within the three minute frame, because -- I wish I had the same
amount of time to address as those looking to submit this. I want to first thank the
Council for hearing our request to hopefully deny this rezoning of the 12.38 acres
of land from R-40 to R -- from R-4 to R-40 and C-C located at North Goddard Creek
Way and McMillan Road. The previous meeting I stated that the traffic flow alone
since the installation of the Selway Apartments has created their share of traffic on
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 37 of 99
Apgar Creek, which has been self-directed over time based upon convenient
access to Linder Road and/or McMillan Road to avoid delays by exiting North
Goddard to McMillan. This increased traffic flow on Apgar Creek has certainly
impeded and put our safety and our family's safety in harm's way. Apgar Creek
has one of our community's largest parks less than a quarter of a mile from the
proposed apartment development and safety is a concern. The speeds in which
teens and adult drivers from the Selway and within our own community can truly
be frightening at times. As parents my wife and I took it upon ourselves two years
ago to reduce our daughter's activities of playing in the front yard or while riding a
razor or a bike near the street due to our concern with the amount of traffic and
speeds on Apgar. It only takes one event to -- to have a tragedy. So, I don't agree
with only having three findings of accidents there. I sell insurance. Auto. Home.
Life. I get those calls every day. So, it only takes one. It only takes one and one
matters to me. In addition to this concern, I also got this sincere feeling that -- at
the last meeting, city planning and development representative was actually
working for the applicant versus for the citizens of Meridian. The Selway
Apartment complex is large. It's 171 units and that's more than sufficient to meet
the housing needs of future homeowners and renters that choose to reside within
our community. Adding an additional 74 units would only devalue the property of
those living in close proximity the complex, while the pockets of the investors would
be filled and they would certainly maintain, but over time properties do devalue.
With apartments it's just an historically effect. So, as much as they say they care,
in the end it is about their profitability and as current homeowners that have
invested our time and our hard earned money in the community, we would rather
see something placed there that would benefit all of us and to add value to our
daily lives in the short and long term and to add to our profitability. After all, that is
why we chose the community. It is my opinion that many others -- and many others
that small business development would ease traffic tension in the evenings and on
the weekends, while actually providing services that can actually be used by those
in the community. I would ask that this request again be denied, that the zoning
remains as the city originally intended. In conclusion I ask this one question based
upon the comments today and would like to paint a quick picture --
De Weerd: Mr. Wade --
Wade: Is my time --
De Weerd: -- your time is up. Can you summarize?
Wade: Absolutely. Let me ask this one thing. This is my reality and many others
here today. Please put yourselves in our shoes. If you truly do, there is no way
that you can you can answer yes to adding this additional development , because
we placed our time into the community and we would just ask that the city pay that
back upon us the citizens. Thank you for your time.
De Weerd: Thank you. No. Please. You can clap internal. Okay.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 38 of 99
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: Can everyone in the back hear? I saw some -- you're okay? Okay. It
looked like some people were leaning a little, like it might have been hard to hear.
Coles: Cheryl and Steve Tolman signed up against and wish to testify. Marcia
Dennis signed up as neutral with no indication of testimony. Willie Taylor signed
up against and wishes to testify.
De Weerd: Good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your
name and address for the record.
Taylor: I'm Willie Taylor. I live at 511 -- or 5001 North Chimney Peak, which is the
corner of Apgar and Chimney Peak, just down the street.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Taylor: So, I appreciate your time. So, through what I have heard today, some of
the questions have been asked and some -- as a concerned citizen, you know,
talking about business hours, 6:00 to 10:00 p.m., I'm perfectly happy with 6:00 to
10:00 p.m., not 24 hours a day running through my neighborhood. I also do wish
to ask that you respect the agreement between the Lochsa Falls and what was
already agreed with the Selway Apartments. I also feel it's interesting that we talk
about paradigms when we talk about single family homes versus apartments. One
of the reasons why we moved into this is because we wanted our single family --
or I do appreciate that it is an apartment and I -- I understand that. I have lived in
apartments many times in my life and I needed that and so -- but I did desire -- as
for not wanting to do the things, there are different models that can be used for
single family homes where it is provided by the developers as we have in Meridian
where it is provided so that they cannot have to do landscaping and other things
like that and I wish we would explore different options in that. But I'd like it to stay
as a business office entity and -- because I think that will help us in the community
grow and we have a way we can tax ourselves for buying stuff and providing
services that we can use in the community and that's what I ask. Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: John Carpenter signed up in favor and wishes to testify.
De Weerd: Thank you for joining us and if you would, please, state your name and
address for the record.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 39 of 99
Carpenter: I will. Good evening. Thank you for having me. John Carpenter. TO
Engineers. My address is 332 North Broadmore and I'm going to flip through this
presentation, Josh, if that's all right with you and I will be quick.
De Weerd: You do have three minutes.
Carpenter: I will be really quick. The project location as shown here -- if my mouse
works. To the west of this is light office and, obviously, to the north is Selway and,
then, single family. This map shows you just the general surrounding areas. As
noted earlier, the planned unit development for this project Lochsa Falls was
approved in 2002. It sat idle for the last -- sat idle for the last 14 years. Sorry
about that. The project is 12 acres. Seven of the acres is storage units on the
west side. On the east side is the four-plexes. The concentration -- or the -- most
of the comments we had on the project is for the four-plexes, so I'm going to hit on
them. Some of -- some of the attractions that were asked earlier is architectural
facades. We have a lot of landscaping on this project. We have tried to beef up
the interior and we beefed up the buffers. There is a lot of walkable space on this
project, not only on the perimeter, but through the interior. If you look between the
storage units and the residential, there is actually a pathway that gets you out of
Selway Falls down to McMillan. It's a really nice transition between single family
over to the light office. So, instead of having the storage units next to Goddard, it
gets us from single family, a little higher density, storage units, light office. Of the
five acres on this we have 1.36 acres of open space. So, there is actually quite a
bit of open space. It was said earlier we are proposing R-40. We are actually
proposing R-15. When we started with Planning and Zoning it was R-40. It was
requested that we drop it. We lost those units. It was 74 units. We are asking for
R-15. Nothing more. Our parking did go up and if you look at the parking -- I will
touch on it briefly. We have way more parking than what's required and we have
got -- we have got it split, so visitors coming in are easily parked and don't have to
walk a long distance. It's not all in one spot. Minimum open space required is just
over an acre. We have almost a half acre more than that. Our parking is shown
there. For Meridian we have to have two parking stalls per unit. We have almost
three. 2.84. And, like I said, they are spread out. One of the things that we had
was traffic and Dan Thompson is going to get up after me , if you can put them in
that order, but one of -- one of the items was just our access to Apgar. We initially
-- if I get this pen out of the way I can move -- had our connection closer to
Goddard. We were asked to move it over to approximate ly -- are you doing that,
Josh? Two hundred and fifty feet to the --
Beach: Sorry. My fault. I wasn't sure --
Carpenter: All right. So, we moved our access 250 feet from Goddard, just to be
a little more stacking distance. We have an emergency access going to the bottom
and the --
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 40 of 99
De Weerd: I'm sorry, you will need to summarize.
Carpenter: I will summarize it. Thank you.
De Weerd: Very good.
Carpenter: We looked at having a shared access between the storage units and
the residential. As Jon said -- Jonathan said earlier, we were told no by Meridian
and ACHD. Dan Thompson I'm going to invite up here to come right after me. We
have quite a bit of amenities. For the R-15 we are required to have four and I will
just note we have five on the project. So, we are not trying to go cheap on it. Any
questions for me?
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: Just a question on parking that you touched on in your presentation.
Carpenter: Yeah.
Cavener: How many vehicles do you anticipate for the development? If you have
got 72 units that are four-plexes -- again, I'm not that bright, but I -- is that like 280
cars if each person only has one vehicle. I don't know if my -- is my math --
Carpenter: We have 74 units here and there is -- there is two car garages on a
portion of them and single car garages on the others. So, you have got parking
underneath and, then, parking right in front of it. So, that doesn't count anything
in the street and, then, we have street parking on top of that. So, that's kind of how
we got to that almost three parking stalls per unit, the garages. Most apartments
aren't -- you know, Selway doesn't have garages. A lot of -- a lot of them don't.
Cavener: Thank you. I appreciate that.
Carpenter: Yeah.
De Weerd: What is the traffic generation in a multi-family development like this
versus a light office?
Carpenter: Well, that is a very interesting question and Dan Thompson is prepared
to talk about that.
De Weerd: Okay.
Carpenter: This is dramatically less than light office. But a very good question.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 41 of 99
De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions, Council?
Bird: I have none, Mayor.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Carpenter: Thank you.
Coles: Dan Thompson signed up in favor and wishes to testify.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: I will lead off with a question that you might answer either answer at the
end or somewhere in there. A lot of discussion about traffic throughout the
hearings and the ACHD staff report makes reference -- makes reference to an
increase in trip volume of eight hundred and some odd daily -- average daily trips.
I believe that's when it had 82 units initially proposed . Your traffic impact study, all
using the same national standard matrix cites an average daily new trip generation
of 705 trips a day, okay? And had it remained as the L-O with 14 units, you cite
using those same measurements that -- the existing approved plan would allow for
1,340 new unique average daily trips. Much greater under its existing than under
your proposed use. So, there is lots of data in the record provided by citizens with
regards to, you know, the magnitude of daily trips right now on these roads without
any development on it. They are much higher than anyone anticipated. If we focus
just on the -- the delta of new trips created by either the existing light office versus
the proposed residential, somewhere in your discussion, if you could, address
whatever foundation leads to that -- that is a big difference. It seems to be
massively more intense of a traffic generator for office use. But if you can get into
the weeds on that a bit, that would help everybody.
Thompson: Okay. Does that cut my three minutes?
De Weerd: No. But you can begin by stating your name and address for the
record.
Thompson: My name is Dan Thompson. I'm with Thompson Engineers. My
business address is 181 East 50th Street in Garden City.
De Weerd: Thank you. Your time begins now.
Thompson: Thank you. Boy. As was mentioned several times, ACHD did not
require a traffic impact study for this, but we did prepare substantially in
conformance with their requirements. The big difference is we didn't meet with
them and discuss the scope, since they didn't require it. The reason we didn't
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 42 of 99
require it -- one of the reasons is it falls well below the threshold that would be
required -- as the Councilman mentioned, even they calculated about 800, but their
threshold is a thousand. I will get right to it -- to Mr. Borton's question. As far as
the difference between theirs and mine, again, we have different numbers of units
and probably the other issue is how they calculate the number of trips at the
storage units. There is several ways you can do it and that -- and I don't remember
what they did, but there could be different ways of doing it. I just used the acreage
on that. But just the ten or 12 units could make a difference in the numbers there.
As far as the -- a proposed land use or the development agreement, the land use
of light office, we had 12 acres, I did not have a site plan to go where I could have
square footage or specific land uses, but we deal with this on a regular basis and
in those situations we can look at what -- the floor area ratio and typically in the
light office you get somewhere between 20 and 25 percent square footage of the
overall acreage. The rest of it goes into parking, landscaping, setbacks or
whatever. So, I just used 22 percent floor area ratio and from that, as mentioned,
I generated almost 1,300 trips per day, as compared to 700 trips. So, almost twice.
But offices are even more intense during the peak hour and the p.m. peak hour I
estimated that a light office would generate 200 trips per hour, whereas what's
being proposed would generate about 70.
De Weerd: Okay.
Thompson: I guess I'll go ahead and finish up. We did go out and count the
intersections during a week day. I was not present at the P&Z meeting, so I didn't
hear a lot of the testimony concerning traffic, but hearing some of the testimony
just tonight I'm kind of confused, because I did not see any significant traffic issues
out there. Clearly the -- the intersection of Goddard Creek and McMillan was
operating at a level of service D and C and adding the site and expanding the traffic
for future -- a future build out time did not significantly change the level of service.
The intersection of Apgar Creek and Goddard Creek was operating at level of
service A in the morning and level of service B in the evening and, again, adding
the site traffic did not significantly impact the level of service. I did not see any
queues developing on Apgar Creek. Very short queues on Goddard Creek at
McMillan. I did not see anywhere near the traffic situation that is being described
here this evening.
De Weerd: Can you summarize your testimony.
Thompson: I'm standing for questions.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Council, any questions? Mr. Borton, did you have
any follow up?
Borton: Just a bit. I take it from the final comment you're not asserting that there
is -- there is a lack of traffic on these roadways from this development. You might
not have observed it, but it truly exists. Would you concede that at least?
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 43 of 99
Thompson: Oh, I can observe what I observed.
Borton: And from a traffic engineering objective data it might not be significant, but
to a mom or dad trying to get in and out for practice --
Thompson: I understand.
Borton: Okay.
Thompson: But there was substantial people that didn't even stop for the stop
sign. They were not delayed by the traffic coming through.
Borton: Madam Mayor. One of the -- if you can articulate -- my question is perhaps
not worded well, but I'm back on this -- the difference between the existing traffic
that would be generated from the office use today versus the residential use and
both ACHD's report and your traffic study make reference to the same 9th Edition
of the --
Thompson: Trip generation manual.
Borton: -- generation manual, so -- and it may be helpful for the residents, in
addition to me, can you articulate some of the -- the objective findings and
conclusions and assumptions that go into an office use and the type of trips they
generate, as opposed to a residential use that would lead to such a massive
difference, because your proposal is, in essence, a proposal to reduce the increase
of traffic that would be generated on this, which -- it's counter intuitive and I think
many members of the public and what we have seen in -- in the petitions and
letters, they all bring up good points.
Thompson: Okay.
Borton: Perhaps you can help articulate --
Thompson: So, 12 acres of light office. If I just take 22 percent of that I can come
up with 115,000 square feet of office space. Okay? Basically a thousand feet of
office space you might have three to four people. Quite often you're -- and not
even more than that in that space. So, in a hundred thousand square feet of office
space you could have a lot of people coming and going in that area and that's all
-- all these numbers are all based on national averages . They are doing national
studies on that and they are published and they are kind of the accepted standard
as to where these are coming from. If you have got four people per thousand feet,
everybody arriving at 8:00 o'clock, it's going to generate a lot of traffic within a small
amount of time. They all get off work at 5:00 o'clock and they are all going to head
for the exits. So, they do generate quite a bit of traffic and it does peak much more
so than residential traffic does.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 44 of 99
Borton: Madam Mayor. It may not be a fair question. I'm not trying to put you on
the spot with it, but oftentimes we rely on these consistent national objective
measures and -- and rarely is it one of the more relevant issues as -- as it is today
in consideration of an application. So, I just wanted to give you a chance to
articulate some of that background data that leads to the conclusion .
Thompson: Correct.
Borton: So, when someone were to say, for example, 1,400 new daily trips as an
office use, but only 700 as a residential use, I'm not buying it. I'm not -- to help
articulate and make me understand here is where the 1,400 comes from.
Thompson: If you're expecting me to go out there and count exactly 705 cars
coming out of that site on any given day, I'm not going to do that either. You know,
it's an average. Some days it's going to be more, some days it's going to be less,
but these are -- this is the science we have. It's the science we have and it's
accepted science throughout the industry.
Borton: Appreciate it.
De Weerd: Any other questions from Council? Okay.
Thompson: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: Brian -- apologize I'm not going to get this last name right. Rolkes? Ralke?
Signed up in favor and wishes to testify.
De Weerd: Hi, Brian. If you will pronounce your last name that would be awesome.
Rollins: Brian Rollins. 902 21st Street, Boise.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Rollins: Madam Mayor, Council Members, my name is Brian Rollins. I work with
Mark Bottles. Mark Bottles could not be here tonight, so I'm here on his behalf.
First of all, I just wanted to ensure that each of you received the letter that Jonathan
Seel referenced that we sent you out --
De Weerd: It is part of the record, yes.
Rollins: Sure. And so I just wanted to comment a little bit on that. You know, we
have been working as the -- the listing brokers on the property. We do a lot of land
development sales in this valley and currently we have about 140 listings active
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 45 of 99
right now, most of which are development lands. So, just commenting a little bit
on what the market appetite is and what's out there . I think, first of all, just for the
record, I wanted to clarify there was some confusion about 74 units, whether that
was multiplied by four or not. I wanted to be clear it is 74 total units divided by 4
as to how many buildings there would be. So, I wanted to make sure that that got
on the record. I think, you know, development -- you know, the very definition of it
is a change in use for land. I think it's important to recognize that people come in
here all the time looking for applications to change use in land . Housing is not
sufficient in this valley. It's growing like crazy. I mean we are -- we have people
moving in the marketplace all the time. I think growth is inevitable. I think it's a
question of what kind. I think as far as density there has been some concerns
about density. We sell a lot of multi-family ground. I will tell you that most
developers are trying to pack density and within R-40, which is what was originally
proposed, you will see developers trying to push 25 to 30 units an acre and try to
get that. We work with Bach Homes, we work with Hawkins Companies, a lot of
the big developers here in town and I will tell you that 14 and a half units an acre
versus twice that for a normal multi-family development is actually fairly light -- light
usage. As far as alternatives, just wanted to talk on that a little bit. It's been part
of the record tonight. But, first of all, if there is some suggestion of storage for the
whole property. There is really not an appetite for that. There is storage going in
all around. I will tell you we do a lot of the storage transactions that you see in
town. Typically storage users are looking for five to seven acres. This is actually
a fairly large storage development. So, there is -- but the idea of 12 and a half
acres all storage really is not viable. Next question being, well, what about office.
As Jonathan stated and as was in our letter, there is a lot of mid-block office in the
comp plan in Meridian that use has really changed over time. First of all,
construction costs don't make it viable for small business owners to go build
individual buildings and, as Jonathan stated, we actually work with and have
associates in our office that have development ground, work with users like Dave
Evans on major arterial hard corners and have lots that are available that have n't
transacted since the 2006. So, I think from a standpoint of what the market has in
store, I think you're going to see applications for change in use on this. I think the
question is what kind. I think we believe this is a very good product. It is lower
density than what we expected from a multi-family user on this property. In talking
with planners at the beginning, bringing this to the forefront as far as a perspective
use, we were encouraged, as we stated in the letter, to go look for this type of use.
So, I just wanted to make it clear, you know, kind of what the marketplace is
pushing towards. I think this is the kind of product that we are going to see. We
need it here in the city and just wanted to -- to kind of talk through some of the
other alternatives that I think really aren 't market viable for this property. Thank
you.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Rollins: Any questions?
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 46 of 99
De Weerd: No. Thank you.
Coles: Guy Young signed up against and does not wish to testify. Stephanie
Young signed up against and does not wish to testify. Tina Taylor signed up
against with no indication of testimony. Bennett Hadden signed up against and
does not wish to testify.
De Weerd: Yes, you can. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your
name and address for the record.
Hadden: Yes. My name is Bennett Hadden. I live at 2723 West Divide Creek
Street in Meridian.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Hadden: I didn't intend to speak tonight. I wanted to show up and just make sure
that I was heard, at least on paper, that I -- I object to this particular development.
I'm actually very pro growth and development person , but I object this particular
project and here is why. One more -- one thing really quick to preface this. My
wife and I bought this home in December of last year. We moved here from
Colorado. When we drove into the neighborhood off of McMillan onto Go ddard
Creek, the realtor took us in and we noticed the pretty water feature and we drove
in and immediately noticed the apartments on the left and my wife said, oh, that's
not good and we continued on and, obviously, we ended up buying the home. It's
been stated before, but I would like to reiterate high density rental properties do
negatively impact single family. They do. It's a fact. Had -- had there been --
since we already have the Selway Apartments there, considering this additional
high density rental unit just seems -- it just seems like the wrong thing at this
location. They actually do look nice. I think they would probably work somewhere
else really well. But I live there, we own the house, I would just like to be on the
record as saying that I am -- I am pro-growth and I'm pro-development, I like things
to be done right. I just think this is the wrong place for this. Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: Yori Delarosa signed up against with no indication of testimony.
De Weerd: Yes, please. If you will, please, state your name and address for the
record.
Delarosa: Yori Delarosa. 1940 West Wapoot Drive.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Delarosa: So, I also am a teacher at the school at Willow Creek and my kids also
attend the school and my I guess big thing is the overcrowding in the school
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 47 of 99
already. I'm the computer teacher and we already don't have enough computers
for the students that we have. So, two kids in 5th grade when they come don't
have a computer. They have to type on a laptop, so -- my concern is mostly for
-- not mostly, but other reasons, but also just as the overcrowding with 74 units,
that's probably going -- and there is like three bedrooms, so I would assume it's
going to be a family unit, so I would assume there would be children. I did hear
him say at the beginning that the school district didn't send an ything, but I saw a
letter from the -- Eric Exline saying that they were not in favor of the project . So, I
just wanted that stated, because I think that I may have heard him incorrectly, but
I thought I heard him say that the -- they didn't hear anyone from the school district
and I thought I saw a letter that said they were not in favor of it, because we are
overcrowded, and middle school and high school right there are overcrowded and
the school -- the kids that would go -- or in the part -- in this area would go to our
Willow Creek school. Okay. Any questions?
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: Excuse me. Just a couple questions about the school.
Delarosa: Sure.
Cavener: I love that you're a teacher. Kudos to you. I could never do that
profession. You have way more patience. Appreciate you have patience with us
tonight. Talk to me a little bit about Willow Creek. How many -- are there like -- I
go back to my school and we had four 5th grades, four 4th grades, four third
grades, four second grades, four first grades, four kindergartens.
Delarosa: No.
Cavener: What is it at Willow Creek?
Delarosa: No. So, actually, there -- so, there are -- we have a TK program for
kindergarten and, then, there is a half day kindergarten teacher and a full day
kindergarten. So, there is four kindergarten classes. There is three first grade.
There is four second. There is four third. There three fourths and three fifths. And
our fifth grade classes are overcrowded. So, they allow 32 and they have 34.
Cavener: Okay. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions, Council?
Bird: I have none.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 48 of 99
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: James Doolin signed up in favor, but does not wish to testify.
De Weerd: Yes. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and
address for the record.
Doolin: My name is James Doolin. 4685 South Highland Drive, Salt Lake City,
Utah.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Doolin: I am the developer. Mayor and Council Members. First of all, I like to be
liked. I wish that I could go keep this land open and put grass there and make
everybody happy. Unfortunately, that's not going to work for -- for anybody or --
so, backing up a bit. When we first went around looking for land in this community
Mark Bottles and Brian Rollins showed me this piece of property. I saw that it was
on a busy road, bordered by potential commercial to the west and, then, multi-
family to the north and I thought this is a great piece of property. It will provide a
nice transition from residential to higher density residential, to storage units, to
commercial. We met with city staff. They gave us positive feedback and, then, we
went and met with -- we went to Planning and Zoning and at the first meeting
Planning and Zoning -- we had some feedback that it didn't appear we had enough
parking, even though the city requires two spaces per unit, we had two and a half,
roughly, it didn't appear it had enough parking, so we added parking. It also --
some feedback we got this project is too tight and there is too many units, so we
reduced the project by ten percent. So, we went from 84 to 70 -- I’m sorry, 82
units to 74 units. We also needed that -- they wanted some more amenities, so
we went up to five amenities. They were concerned about traffic, so we moved
our traffic entrance. So, we tried to appease what we thought was the feedback
from the Planning and Zoning and also from the neighbors and we met with the
neighbors after that first Planning and Zoning meeting and tried to figure out what
would work for them. At the end of the other day I think we did a pretty good job
at doing that, but there is still some concerns and I understand that. A lot of
concerns that I'm hearing tonight are based on opinion . It feels like there is so
much traffic, so I hired -- I engaged Dan to complete a traffic study. I called up the
school district, because the schools are overcrowded, and I talked with Joe Yocum
and he -- his letter that he provided actually -- and he pointed this out -- he doesn't
ever state if he's in favor or against a development and I talked with him briefly.
Willow Creek School he said is not overcrowded based his assessment. There is
592 active students. The school was built for 650. Sawtooth, excuse me, is at
1,081 and was built for a thousand, but there is a new middle school being built
approximately four miles from Goddard Creek that will relieve that problem. I got
to grab some water real quick.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 49 of 99
De Weerd: You're back in time to summarize.
Doolin: Right. Okay. So, long story short, we are trying to do what's -- what we
feel is best for this community. Light office is what's intended for this or was initially
intended for this. I feel like the impact of light office is going to be much more
impactful than what we are providing -- or what we are offering today. It's 74 units
over a 12 acre site, roughly 6.6 units an acre. That impact I believe should impact
these residents a lot less than eight light office lots.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Doolin: So, thank you very much. I appreciate your time.
De Weerd: Any questions from Council? Okay.
Coles: Shon Parks signed up in favor, but does not wish to testify. Carol Young
signed up against and does not wish to testify. Dorothy Peverley signed up against
and does not wish to testify. Diane McClain signed up against and does not wish
to testify. Richard Stilwell signed up against and does wish to testify.
De Weerd: Good evening.
Stilwell: Good evening. Richard Stilwell. 5170 -- 17 North Dove Ridge Place,
Meridian, in the Kelly Creek Subdivision. I'm also a director of the HOA board for
Kelly Creek. I had --
De Weerd: Would you desire more time?
Stilwell: I'm reminded of what my professor once told me. Saying something three
times doesn't make it any more correct than saying it one time.
De Weerd: Smart man.
Stilwell: What I'm going to do -- on the fly here kind of amend my comment. I think
you have heard enough about the Lochsa Falls --
De Weerd: Can you pull the mic closer to you. Thank you.
Stilwell: I think you have heard enough about the Lochsa development plan and
the fact that people relied on that. There is two or three things -- points that I
wanted to make is that -- first of all, the traffic, because I was dealing with this as
an HOA member today. When I was preparing for this I was also reading about
30 e-mails from other HOA board members and we are actively in the process of
buying speed limit and slow down signs, because of the traffic volume and the
traffic speed within Kelly Creek. Part of that is because of the difficulty in people
-- particularly during rush hour, getting access through Goddard and Apgar onto
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 50 of 99
West McMillan. They drive through the development over to Linder, so they can
make right-hand turns, it's easier to do that onto Linder and, then, go into town
during rush hours and the speed has increased and the volume has increased and
we are also in contact with the city, we are going to have one of those electronic
speed signs brought out and if that doesn't slow things down with the approaching
summer, we are going to be talking to the police department about actually coming
out and ticketing speeders. I will be the first to admit that this isn't all renters from
Selway, it's more some of our homeowners and particularly their teenage sons and
daughters that need to be slowed down. But the traffic volume is a real issue and
it -- Mr. Wade talked about that. I have had other parents, homeowners complain
with regards to the safety of their small children. The second thing that I want to
talk about is -- and certainly the Council here knows how to weigh these issues,
but what they are, basically, asking for is to amend this development plan and I
started to wonder about that and I thought, well, what are the criteria that the City
Council should consider when making that kind of decision and I decided, well, I
would think that they would want to see a substantial change or a substantial need.
Is there a greater need for more apartment complexes in that area . Kelly Creek
already has on the east side, just by -- through the discussion of the previous
application, an apartment -- apartment complexes. On the west side of Kelly Creek
we have a 171 unit Selway Apartment complex. Now we are getting another
apartment complex being asked for and it seems like the need that's being
expressed here as well -- you know, we want to max -- the developer wants to
maximize their return on investment. There is nothing wrong with that. These are
honorable men. They have conducted themselves through this process as
gentlemen. There is nothing wrong with maximizing a return on investment. But
from a community -- or from a city perspective I don't think that dictates a
substantial change. I mean a substantial change would be we need more
apartment complexes and that's the ideal place to put it.
De Weerd: Mr. Stilwell, your time is up.
Stilwell: Okay. For those reasons I would submit that you deny the application.
Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: Cheryl Hopkins signed up against and does not wish to testify. Jonathan
Hopkins signed up against and does not wish to testify. Angie Ludlow signed up
against and does not wish to testify. Addie Dosy signed up against and does not
wish to testify. Rod Ludlow signed up against and does wish to testify.
De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and
address for the record.
Ludlow: Rodney Ludlow. 2347 West Apgar Creek.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 51 of 99
De Weerd: Thank you.
Ludlow: As I begin -- if we could pull up a map of the area , including the
development area, Apgar Creek and a little bit of Rocky Mountain. So, as I begin
I'd like to actually kind of tap into our human knowledge. As a little kid and as a
young adult -- and as an adult now I still try to find the easiest route to get in , out,
or through things and what I'd like to -- as I bring that to mind one of the things I'd
like to point out on this map -- where the site is developed, if we look at Apgar
Creek -- West Apgar Creek, it runs directly through our subdivision, all the way to
North Linder. Now, living off of Apgar Creek for the last seven years we have
noticed the traffic increase as people have become aware of that corridor. I'd also
like to point out that the park of Kelly Creek is located off of that street. There are
stop signs that are frequently dismissed. With that in mind as the -- as more
development, obviously, that is going to bring more traffic. Also as we look on
McMillan and Linder, we, obviously, have the Walgreen's, the Taco Johns. Earlier
discussed was a Gyro, the Dutch Bros -- as that develops the traffic through Apgar
Creek, that corridor, is going to also increase. So, that would probably be my
largest safety concern and now I would just like to throw some numbers from some
-- throw some numbers of the school district of Rocky Mountain. When the high
school was constructed it was designed for 18 -- or 1,800 students and staff. In
2016 they had a record of 2,312 enrolled students, excluding staff. As the density
of Paramount increases and all the development, obviously, those schools are
going to continue to overcrowd and I understand that that is a basic problem that
we all face. That -- like I said, I just wanted to share my concern with that and
share those numbers. Thank you for your time and your consideration.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: Question for -- and I apologize for putting you on the spot.
Ludlow: No.
Cavener: And maybe this isn't a question for -- but do you know how many homes
are in your neighborhood -- what the total home --
Ludlow: According to the development agreement -- and that's the information that
I had available -- available to me -- excuse me? Oh.
De Weerd: I didn't say anything.
Ludlow: Oh. Sorry. In the development agreement there was 856 single family
homes and 171 multi-family homes in the development.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 52 of 99
Cavener: Thank you.
Ludlow: You're welcome.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: Fran Blottles signed up against and does not wish to testify. Steve Blottles
signed up against and does not wish to testify. Alex Astas signed up against and
does not wish to testify. Geraldine Astas signed up against and does not wish to
testify. Jamie Pullman signed up against and would like to testify.
Pullman: Good evening.
De Weerd: Good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you will state your name
and address.
Pullman: Jamie Pullman. 5030 North Guard Creek Way.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Pullman: I do have a slide. It's not very good quality and I apologize, but we might
be able to -- what was that? We might be able to answer some of the traffic
questions, especially Mr. Borton's question. I have -- recently we had a traffic
count from Ada -- Ada County Highway District -- excuse me. I'm really nervous.
I'm sorry. I hope I can get to my points through my nervousness. And that was
May 2nd --
De Weerd: Do you want to start the time once she gets the presentation up.
Beach: I'm not finding the slide for her.
Pullman: Can I keep talking?
De Weerd: Yes, you can. ACHD did a recent traffic count in May -- May 3rd and
May 4th. They put the counters out May 2nd, took them out on the 5th and I have
that from Ada county. Debbie White sent it to me today in an e-mail and that's
what my slide is -- is the traffic count.
De Weerd: We do have -- yeah. So, if you can give it to the clerk, he will put it up
there. What's called an Elmo or something.
Pullman: Okay. On an average week day, 24 hour period, as you will see from
what we just received today, 3,268 cars go through McMillan and Goddard Creek.
My point is in -- two years ago Debbie told me they do the traffic counts every two
years. Two years ago it was less than 1,900. So, in two years we have close to
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 53 of 99
double that. The fact of the matter is that we have no new housing in our area.
So, it's not from new houses, it's -- it's from the existing apartment complex that's
there, all the houses. What is causing the increase in traffic is people using our
access roads, Goddard Creek, Apgar Creek, to access through -- excuse me.
Goddard Creek they will access up to Rocky High School. It's so much easier to
go that way than to go up Linder. That's one reason. The other reason is all the
new development, commercial and retail, that's on the corner of McMillan and Ten
Mile, which we love having that out there, but everybody is accessing coming
through. The top of our neighborhood -- of Lochsa Falls, all the way down Goddard
Creek, they are coming to access over there to get to Walmart, to get to the
restaurant, physical therapist, the dental offices -- all those things over there. The
pizza place. So, we have a huge increase in traffic in our area and the proof is in
the pudding with what Ada county just sent me. Now, if I could, please -- a couple
of things to answer your question, they work -- you were not understanding how
there could be so many more trips with an office complex versus the residential.
Well, it's a little bit confusing, but when you look at it, this -- they are saying that if
the full 12 acres were office buildings, there would be that many more trips. Well,
they are not all going to come out on Apgar and Goddard, they have access from
McMillan Road. They are making it sound like -- maybe not to you, but to me --
the report makes it sound like 1,300 extra trips are going to come out that one
intersection. Well, that's not true. Will it be impacted? Certainly. But it's not all
going to come out. So, it makes it look like the five acres of high density has way
less traffic than -- than the office complex would be and that -- that's -- I don't think
it -- they made that clear. Does that answer your question about where that high
number of 1,300, you know, come from? And also the developer -- or, excuse me,
the owner just said that there is 74 units. He may have misspoken, but he said 74
units over 12 acres. It's not 74 units over 12 acres, it's 74 units over five acres.
So, I just want to make that clear. I know I'm out of time, but I want to say one
more thing. The storage units, I clocked this with my car, which is not scientific,
but within one mile there are -- would be three storage units if you approve this
project. The one that's right by the treatment plant, the one that's just a few
hundred yards north of the existing storage units, and, then, you come up around
the corner and we have got another giant storage unit project within one mile if this
is approved. Now, I know these are commercial sites, the storage units. I know
it's commercial. But when you drive by a big giant metal building, it looks industrial.
I don't care what your landscaping is, it looks industrial and I don't think that's what
we want and I hope that you will vote against this project.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: Jennifer Blasco signed up against and does not wish to testify. With that,
Madam Mayor, that is all that signed up on the public hearing sign-in sheet.
De Weerd: Is there anyone else -- I'm sorry, you can't do it off the record. Council,
he is the HOA president. If you wish to hear from him again -- please. If you will,
please, state your name for the record.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 54 of 99
Stilwell: Richard Stilwell. 5117 North Dove Ridge Place. I'm the director for the
Kelly Creek HOA.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Stilwell: I think a question was asked is how many houses are in the Kelly Creek
Subdivision and the number is 372. The 800 number includes Lochsa Falls
development. Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Is there anyone else who would like to provide testimony?
Yes, sir.
Alatorre: Madam Mayor, sorry for not signing up. I got confused on if I was the
applicant or not.
De Weerd: That's all right.
Alatorre: My name is Tim Aletorre. I am the project architect for the storage units
and, Josh, if you can put my plan up -- I just want to go over a couple things really
quickly on the traffic. We are acknowledging that 215 of those trips are for the
storage units. The storage isn't a zero traffic entity. There is some traffic generated
from that. It's only about 492 are going up Apgar and I wanted to just go through
really quickly and show you that we are trying to create a good project for this
neighborhood. I think we really put together an A plus team on this. Originally we
were coming in with just the storage facility. We had a -- there is a market need
for it. There are a lot of storage units within a mile, but they are full and so there
is a need for that. But we were stuck. We couldn't move on this project without
filling this gap for the five acres and it took us quite a while to find a use that would
work for that space and the neighbors -- we had a community meeting with the
neighbors early on, it was storage and they all loved our project and I understand
their frustrations with the use that we are proposing here, but looking at the
alternative it works economically, it works with the development team, and we
really do think it's the best fit long term for what could possibly go in here . If we
don't put something in here, you know, it's a gamble on which developer in 12
years from now is going to take another look at this and see what they can do . I
did want to just show that we are heavily landscaping the storage facility and also
-- just going to skip through some of this stuff, we don't -- we are not redundant. I
just want to show you the exterior. So, we are not doing a blank metal building.
The City of Meridian recently passed their new design criteria. I think we are the
first storage facility going into the new design criteria, but we really want to make
this something that's pedestrian scale, that's a cohesive design. If you notice here
we have these tower elements. The tower elements wrap the corners and all the
ends of the buildings. We are really trying to make this something with material
changes and sod articulation that's a good transition from the housing -- multi-
family housing and this future commercial and I will yield the rest of my time.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 55 of 99
De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Is there anyone else who would like to -- yes, sir. I will get to you next.
Newell: Thanks very much.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Newell: Sam Newell. 398 South Olive Way, Lehi, Utah. I'm actually the marketing
agent that works with Mr. James Doolin. When we started the meeting tonight you
were talking about your scholarship winners I guess they were. I went Mary
McPhearson, Meridian Middle School, and Meridian High School and I was the
first graduating class of Mountain View High School. So, I'm actually one of those
type of people that went away for school and am now coming back and moving
back to Meridian, bringing my career and my family and my business with me.
When my mom and sister and I moved to Meridian in 1997 there was about 36,000
residents. As of 2015 there is over 75,000. Those are rough numbers. You can
fact check me, because just going off of memory there. Based on the research I
have done for the last six months for the Boise valley, we are looking at about
300,000 more residents in the next ten to fifteen years. The whole Boise valley,
not just Meridian. So, you guys have --
De Weerd: Thank you for clarifying that.
Newell: I know you guys --
De Weerd: We are ready to pass out.
Newell: I don't envy your job. Sorry. So, what we did research is there is a two
and a half percent vacancy rate in Boise valley. There is a huge, huge demand
for residential and multi-family housing. Huge demand. As far as commercial goes
-- and the higher traffic, but also the demand, that's what we would be developing
if there was demand for that. There is simply not. I could not come out and sell
and do -- have such a large career change and move back to Meridian for
commercial real estate. It's just not going to happen. What my clients and my
business partners and I have noticed is that there is a huge demand for residential
housing and people, just like in Utah and other parts of the country, that are
attractive -- like in Meridian, don't have housing and rents are going up, they are
skyrocketing -- skyrocketing because there is not a medium income level housing.
There is, you know, 15 to 18 hundred dollars a month and, then, there is your 1,200
dollar a month. What our project will do -- will fit right in the middle of our two and
three bedroom flats versus a large home to rent and that's what we are providing.
So, I don't think it's a question of if this land is going to get developed, because it's
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 56 of 99
very enticing. It's a great piece of land. It's really just what's going to be put in it,
whether it's commercial, which I don't see happening. I don't see any demand for
that. Like I said, that's what we would be selling if there was demand, and storage
units. There is plenty of storage units being built like they already presented. So,
really, it seems like a question of are you going to put more stacked, high, high
density multi-family units or more of a single style residential unit. I'm not saying it
is a single family, but that's what we have tried to accomplish is that type of style.
De Weerd: You will need to summarize.
Newell: I'm done.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Newell: Thank you very much.
De Weerd: Thank you for being here. If you will state your name and address for
the record.
Humphries: Glen Humphries. 6880 North Pira Avenue, Meridian. Can I get the
picture back up that depicted McMillan and Ten Mile and the Lochsa development
above it? Okay. I spent 35 years in law enforcement in the state of California and
I'm very glad to be here in Idaho. Yesterday on the news they were commenting
that 26,000 people moved to the Treasure Valley in Idaho in 2016, 10,000 came
from California, Oregon, Washington and Utah. The growth in Meridian got the
most and Nampa was second. So, in other words, we are growing very quickly.
What we are looking at in this picture is McMillan and Ten Mile and above that is
Chinden and I live in Spurwing Greens. For instance, those roadways are buckets.
They are one gallon buckets. And what the City of Meridian is doing is trying to
empty gallons and gallons of water into one bucket and the buckets can't hold the
water any longer and what's happening -- the traffic is flowing out of that one gallon
bucket and it's going onto side streets, it's going through developments. The
infrastructure is not here to hold what you are trying to dump into it. There was no
planning ahead to put infrastructure in to put in wider roads, schools, other
developments. You are overtaxing the system. The schools can't take it. The
high schools. There are levies, bonds almost monthly trying to get more money to
build more schools. ACHD says roads aren't planned to be widened. Chinden has
no plans for ten years. You are just now working on portions of Ustick and
McMillan. The area cannot take high density growth. It cannot take it. That's all I
wanted to say. Thank you very much.
De Weerd: Thank you. I'm sorry, we don't do that in this room. Remember, clap
to yourself. Is there any further testimony? Yes, sir. Thank you for being here this
evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 57 of 99
Melander: Thank you. So, Martin Melander. 3644 North Summercrest Place in
Meridian, Idaho. I have been a resident of Idaho since I was a little kid and --
De Weerd: Can you pull that mic up.
Melander: I will. I have been a resident of Idaho since I was about four years old.
My -- all my ancestors are from this area. My family moved away for college and
they came back when I was a baby. I'm now 52 years old. What you see on this
road and this -- in this map -- what the gentleman just talked about, if what was --
if that was true, what we are saying, then, we are going to stop all growth, because
I used to ride my ten speed on Eagle Road when it was a flashing light and there
was no access. Many of you are from here. Some of you. Some of -- many of
you and many of these people behind me aren't from here and never were from
here. They just moved here. But you just invited during your -- you just had your
scholars that received a scholarship. You invited them to come back. If you invite
them to come back and you expect this area to continue to grow and to do good,
you're going to have to find a place for them . There is going to be need to do
growth. I'm not here to complain about the roads. I understand it. For 20 years I
have been building in this valley. For 15 years of that I have owned multi- family,
I have owned single family, and I have owned all kinds of commercial properties.
I have my kids. I want them to move back. They are at school away from the
valley. I wouldn't mind if they came back, but I have got to find a place and develop
this, so that they want to come back. We have got a great place here and I don't
think anything about this development is going to change that . I think -- as I was
looking at Selway Apartments that were way in there way before Kelly Creek,
because I know that, because I was in the development side of some of those
areas. Lochsa Falls -- somebody -- I have heard Boise miscommunicated and
mispronounced. I've heard Lochsa mispronounced. If you're from Idaho you know
what the Lochsa is. You know what these things are and you understand how to
pronounce them. We have talked about traffic matrix. We have talked about lots
of things. One thing for sure, as my rental, I have them -- I just had one that I
rented out. I had -- in 15 minutes 20 applications from all across the United States.
The people that are moving here are good, wholesome people. They are a doctor.
There are professors from Texas Tech. They are going to be working downtown.
None of these people are low lifes or whatever the perception may be. They simply
aren't that. This development is for good, wholesome people. Because somebody
classifies multi-family is not that, the world has changed. These are nice
developments. Sure, it's going to increase traffic on our roads, but the lady that
spoke before said the Walmart increased traffic flows by 2,000 something cars.
There is what brought traffic to their neighborhood, not this development. And,
then, another -- Borton asked what constitutes -- I will summarize real quick. What
constitutes -- constitutes -- because I own some commercial properties -- what
constitutes visits to those offices? Well, you have got -- per thousand people you
may have employees per thousand square feet. Every one of those are -- may
have customers that come and go on a 15 minute regular basis. Now, you multiply
that by the number of hours and you will see why that is increasing the traffic over
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 58 of 99
light office -- way over what we are going to currently -- currently is being proposed.
So, I want to express my opinion that I'm for this development and I am probably
not the one that's probably more pro growth, but I do know that change and growth
does happen and it can be managed and this is a good way to do it.
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Any further testimony? Would the applicant like to
summarize?
Seel: Sometimes I think I'm getting too old for this stuff. Jonathan Seel again.
First thing I'd like to do is I'd like to read a comment in the staff report. Do I get --
I get three minutes? Fifteen?
De Weerd: You have ten.
Seel: Okay. In the staff report it says -- the area in the vicinity of West McMillan
and Ten Mile has limited housing options. The proposed project would propose
housing diversity and provide greater opportunities for residents to live in the place
for employment and shopping. I think we can go back and forth and argue about
traffic. Obviously, whatever project goes in here, the fact of the matter is it's going
to create traffic. So, maybe it's just a difference of opinion the degree of it. I'm not
a traffic expert, so I'm not going to speak to that, but from my opinion I think what
you're faced with today is you can either maintain the existing development
agreement, which is L-O and there is no market for it and it will stay like that for
who knows how many years. Although, you do have the opportunity to change.
Or I think you have the opportunity here to bring in a development that I think , as I
mentioned before, I think is a third option in this community. If you look at the
Selway Apartments or any apartments or even, for that matter, Redtail Apartments,
this is not like Redtail. It is quality. Okay. And that's the term maybe I should have
used. But it's a different animal, but it's also not a single family and I think the
desire of this community is to give residents the option of various housing and this
is another one. So, some people call it multi-family, I have a question with that,
but I think the bottom line is you have the opportunity to bring in a project that I
don't think is going to impact this community. I think it's going to be a positive. As
I mentioned before, I think all the things that are built in for -- for the maintenance
and the care and the quality of it represents what this community stands for or you
can leave it as a weed field for who knows how many years, because there is a lot
out there right now that is not being used up as L-O. So, I think that's the decision.
Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you, Jonathan. Council, any questions for the applicant? Thank
you.
Seel: Thank you very much.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 59 of 99
De Weerd: Council, I guess I would recommend not closing the public hearing
until you have a chance to have a conversation, see if there is any further questions
that you have for anyone who has provided testimony or for staff or the applicant.
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: So, one of the issues that I have with this -- you know, it is not a -- it's not
a terrible development, but as far as where it is and the other apartments that are
in correlation with this, creates almost a third of that development agreement into
apartments and to me that seems like a huge change and I don't think that was
what was intended. I agree that people want to move here and that's great, we
have a wonderful place to live, but that doesn't mean that we are just going to cram
as many people in as tight of space as we can, so that we can fit more in, I'm not
in any kind of hurry to just open the flood gates and get as many people as we can.
We are already growing fast enough and I think that it makes too many apartments
in the area that was planned to be out there.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I guess this goes to show us that has been on this Council back in 2002 that
-- that regardless of how well you plan ahead and -- and, you know, these people
that are here that bought their homes and thinking this was going to be L-O or R-
4, that's what we had certainly planned at that time, but the economics of the valley
does change. I do -- I do not like the developer comparing this to Redtail at all,
because there is -- it's not even close to being a Redtail. The amenities is not there
at all period. It's an apartment complex. With, in fact, very few amenities, in my
opinion, for the amount of -- of people that are going to be in it, so -- but there is a
need for the multi-family. I don't understand it. In our day we -- we worked hard
to save money and start a -- get our house -- get a single family house and now
the young ones -- and I have grandsons and granddaughters that are -- I think
somebody hit it right when they said they want to be able to move fast. So, it's
kind of like, you know, you used to stay with a job your whole life if you had a good
job, but now they have more jobs in ten years in -- you know. I don't know. It's --
the changing times. In 1996 we probably had at the most 19,000 in Meridian. 2000
we -- the official count was 30,000 -- 34,000, in fact, and now I think we are going
to probably get hit 100,000 this year and while we haven't done a perfect job, I
think we have tried and, personally, I'd like to see R-4 in there, single family
housing, but that is not what the economics call for right now.
De Weerd: I was on City Council in 2002. This came as a planned community
that -- and when Selway Apartments came in we worked with the neighbors and
said this was master planned and we wanted to make sure that the real estate
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 60 of 99
industry was accurately presenting to those that purchase the homes -- that
purchased in that area what the long-term vision was. Therein lies my problem is
we came and we said those apartments were planned and so there wasn't too
much we can do. These apartments weren't planned and I think that there are --
they look nice, the elevation is nice. I think they will have potentially a lower impact
traffic wise, but it's not what was in the master plan and, then, you need to work
with the neighbors and -- and find that middle ground of what can go there or you
wait until the market catches up. I have a hard time believing that -- I do know that
the rental market is strong, but so is the single family housing. You can put a
house on the market and it will have five offers on it in two days. So, you can't tell
me the single family housing market is not there. It is. We are seeing it. I do want
a clarification point. Our staff works with everyone that walks in the door and they
will tell you what is in the master plan, what is entitled. They will tell you what
options there are in working with property owners, what might be possible. They
don't share their opinion. They will work with neighbors that walk in the door and
talk about the process and what the options are. They don't play sides. They play
our plan. They work with -- with our citizens and our customers. That's -- that's
their job. So, I do want to make sure that they are working with our Unified
Development Code and our land use plans that do anticipate flexibility within that
plan. So, I don't want anyone to think that they have taken a side. They are --
they are Switzerland and -- and it's not easy being stuck in the middle oftentimes.
So, I do want to at least put that out on the record . I know that we denied an
apartment complex up in the northeast corner of Lochsa Falls, because it wasn't
anticipated in the plan, and the neighbors weren't anticipating that development
either. I hope there is an opportunity for further conversations and compromise. I
don't know what -- what direction Council is going to go on this, but I think we have
a master planned development that if I knew that there was one and I did my
research, there would not be apartments on that corner and I would expect the --
the city to honor my purchase. And I was here. So, I'm just one of two that were
here.
Palmer: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: And I will -- I'm sorry, Mr. Palmer. And I will say I got beat up a lot for
the Selway Apartments. I think I recognize several of your faces, so -- Mr. Palmer.
Palmer: Madam Mayor, since we are all reminiscing on where we were in 2002, I
was a freshman at Meridian High School and, then, I was the third graduat ing class
at Mountain View. I grew up here in Meridian. Had there been a hospital in
Meridian I would have been born in Meridian. We didn't have one. I was b orn
downtown Boise. So, I was there for a couple days and, then, made my way here.
And I grew up here. I was fortunate enough that in my family situation we were
always able to be in single family homes. Many of them -- we moved a lot. All
over Meridian. And, then, when I left home Meridian had changed a little bit . It
wasn't all single family rooftops. There were other opportunities besides a few
apartment buildings in downtown Meridian for people who wanted to stay in
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 61 of 99
Meridian, start a family and grow and be able to, then, move into a -- afford to be
able to move into a home. I'm on my second home now and my first house was
barely larger than the apartment that we lived in right before it at a thousand square
feet. Now we have got four kids and a little bit larger home. There are lots of
options now in Meridian, but there is still -- I feel that even though we built a lot
more multi-family, as we're calling it, recently than before, there is still a major lack.
We are still at a point where those that are leaving home , but want to stay here,
are having a hard time to find -- finding a place to, then, be able to, hopefully, go
on and -- and either stay in that if they want to be able to move faster -- Millennials
these days -- or who knows. But if they want to be able to go into a single family
home, then, they have that opportunity. But they -- so many people are moving
out -- they are moving to Boise, they are moving to Nampa, because there is not
enough of this here and I feel like this is a quality project that's been put here -- it's
not all four stories, stairwells, all cookie cutter like a lot of the apartments that we
see around. These look like skinnier homes that are attached to each other.
Townhouses. As opposed to just apartment buildings. And so I -- economic
situations change. This -- I believe business owners, when they say it's not a viable
option to put what was originally planned here 15 years ago -- we have changed a
little in 15 years. If this makes more sense because, sure, it's going to be more
profitable, even if they are able to fill light offices, this is probably going to be more
profitable anyway, plus it's what's in demand and so we should give an opportunity
for those who want to be able to stay here to work their way up and be able to stay
in Meridian, instead of kicking them out to Nampa and Boise.
De Weerd: Other comments? Discussion? Questions?
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Cavener: I appreciate the comments from Council tonight. I think that this is,
obviously, an issue that has been weighing on our shoulders this evening and I
somewhat echo Council Member Palmer's comments. You know, when I moved
back to Meridian after I graduate college I rented a house, because I couldn't find
an apartment to rent. There was some apartments that my mother would have
killed me if I lived in and other apartments that were tax subsidized housing that I
couldn't -- you know, I made too much to be able to live in. So, I rented a house
until I bought. I don't know if in 2002 we could have conceived that we would be a
community of 100,000 people. If you would have told me in 2005 or 2010 that we
would be a community of 100,000 people, I would laugh and make you a bet that
I would surely lose. So, that's -- that's challenging and what -- are best forecast
for what our community could be has changed and changed dramatically. Families
in Meridian come in different shapes and sizes and, likewise, rented housing
comes in different shapes and sizes. We have got our residents that live in
apartments. We have got residents who live in big houses with big yards. We got
residents with big houses and little yards and big yards a little houses. W ide
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 62 of 99
variety. And as a community we pride ourselves on that. We want to be able to
offer a place where people can live and work within our community and diverse
housing supports that. I applaud the residents that are here tonight, anyone saying
we don't like apartments. I saw it and I appreciate it. Quite frankly, we don't get
that in every City Council meeting and I appreciate the testimony tonight was --
was pragmatic. The challenge to me is changing the development agreement,
because I would think that any time we would want to change it is because there
is a dramatic improvement into the area around it and, man, in 2005 when I moved
back here, if this apartment was available I would have ran to it. Compared to
what we had at the time it would have stood above all . We talked a lot about
Redtail tonight as a gold standard. Oh, I think in 2005 this development would
have been the gold standard. And I think it would actually make a lot of sense in
a lot of different parts of our community. I think this is something that is going --
this type of project we have seen a lot of and it's somewhat desirable. I struggle
with is it such an improvement, though, that it warrants us changing the
development agreement in that particular area. I'm struggling with that, quite
frankly. And so why? I think we need more multi-family in Meridian to support our
changing community. Also I want to be respectful to our residents that were here
in 2002 that were expecting that their last home or their first home -- the things
around it weren't going to change and so I'm hoping to hear for the rest of us
tonight, specifically maybe about development agreement, your thoughts are
appreciated. For me that's the one piece that I am really wrestling with.
Little Roberts: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: I concur with Councilman Cavener. At the Chamber we have the
visitor center and we get many many people -- especially this time of year coming
in and saying can you give us help with housing. You don't have what we are
looking for with that in between lovely retired couple seem to be the thing coming
in lately that want to follow their grandchildren . But really struggling with -- we
changed the development agreement, that gold standard. Love to hear from
everyone else.
De Weerd: I think that means one more councilman. Mr. Borton.
Borton: Madam Mayor. I do appreciate the discussion and going through this --
this process and I love the -- the diverse comments and history of the Council
Members as we talk about it. I don't -- I appreciate the objective minutia of the
project and particularly the traffic impact study and preparation for the hearing, a
lot of the e-mails and comments from the public and the Planning and Zoning
testimony that was provided had a common theme of support for the project itself
and its design and development, but what I saw as the overriding issue is -- is
perhaps a great project in the wrong location. There was a lot of compliments --
we even heard them tonight about the -- the applicant and his development staff
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 63 of 99
has done wonderful work here. But the concern is its location. So, a lot of my
questions are focused on traffic counts and traffic impact studies and the delta and
additional traffic -- kind of the wonky stuff that I thought was going to be a little
more part of the discussion. I -- I didn't look at this as a change in a plan. This
isn't -- this isn't county ground within the city that's requesting to be annexed and
for its first time perhaps subject to just the future land use map , there is a -- just a
plan which might indicate what probably should happen on this property, but what
we have -- what's been referenced since 2002 is a vested property right wherein
this property owner has a present ability to develop 11 lots on 12 acres -- excuse
me --11 commercial lots or light office lots on these 12 acres. Like it or not, that's
the landscape that we have and we started tonight's hearing with, it's what many
of you might have purchased your home expecting for better or worse , that's the
vested property right that exists, which is a different starting point than other
instances where it might be a blank slate and we are using our best crystal ball,
comp plan, future land use map, to try and guide development. I applaud the
developed. I think they have done a fantastic job in trying to address all of the
issues raised by the public through multiple Planning and Zoning Commissions
and even today they seem more than willing to try and accommodate the concerns,
but it sounds like from the public traffic aside, there is a unanimous position in
opposition of making this change to the existing property right. Despite the efforts
to reduce the units, the lots, the density, I -- in review of the materials and hearing
the testimony, it seems to be a round peg in a square hole. Great project that
might be best located somewhere else. At least that's the summation of the
testimony here from a lot of the public and a lot of the data we hear with regards
to demand for different types of housing products in the city I don't disagree with,
but it didn't necessarily answer the question of this type of product at this location .
In the city as a whole and this region of Meridian may benefit from this type of
product and diverse housing types, but to these 12 acres that -- that are supposed
to be light office, do they warrant this change and we take the input from the public
very seriously and it plays as a big role at least in the consideration -- all of the e-
mails, they are all read and reviewed and the exhibits you at tach and showing up
and providing testimony, we don't always have that. Oftentimes things move
smoothly. But when there is a concern raised we appreciate the public's input.
You have been active throughout the whole process. So, I'm not convinced at the
conclusion of this hearing that a change is warranted. I thought I might hear
different remarks in particular with regards to traffic, but the overwhelming
consensus to me seems that this community in this region has trusted and -- and
felt committed to the existing designations on this property and that they would like
to see the long term plan -- even if it's difficult in the short term, the long term plan
fulfilled. That would mean a denial of the application and keeping the existing land
use as previously approved. That's the takeaway that I have got from all of the
materials, from the initial application, including through today's hearing with all the
testimony.
Palmer: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 64 of 99
De Weerd: Mr. Palmer.
Palmer: I would make some additional point. I have a thought here. We had a
community presentation before us where the idea was floated that we take pieces
of agricultural land and lock it down for time and all eternity as such , regardless of
any future owner, and that idea scares me, that there is no mechanism to change
what that land use could be. We have in our code a mechanism for that where
tonight's meeting can take place, to say, hey, the previous plan isn't going to work.
How much time is needed for a piece of property to sit vacant after one idea is --
is set and doesn't work out, for us to say, okay, we will consider a different option?
Fifteen years is not enough?
De Weerd: I don't know. When we were discussing this in 2002 this was a 20 year
phased plan and, you know, it developed a lot quicker than it had been anticipated
and the apartments came at the tail end, which made the misery as part of that.
But I know that the market does change. There is -- there is no doubt about that.
But we have a lot of greenfield. It doesn't have to go right there. I go back to --
we made it very specific when Selway came through that residents when they
bought they needed to know what -- that was part of the master plan, that
development agreement, and that was our expectation that that plan was out there
and that residents would know what they were buying into . The gentleman from
Colorado who -- who bought December over a year ago, he would have done his
research and saw that it was -- it was light office and would not have known that
there was an opportunity to change that plan. It's a good development. It really
is. And I don't think you heard anyone testify we don't want those people in our
backyard and we don't want those buildings . It was about this is not what they
knew would be in that area. You did a good job.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: A member of the applicant team --
De Weerd: Okay.
Borton: -- has a response or a question.
Carpenter: I just want to -- excuse me. John Carpenter. TO Engineers. There is
actually two applicants. If I can get to the right spot. Can you get me onto our --
a portion is storage units, a portion of it is residential. What I was going to toss o ut
there -- if we are really just opposed to the residential, nobody is -- nobody has
been opposed to the storage units. I would suggest if we are going to go denial
on the residential, we pull the residential off and approve the conditional use permit
just for the storage units as a stand-alone on the seven acres on this property. I
just wanted to toss that out there as an option.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 65 of 99
Palmer: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Palmer.
De Weerd: I don't think the -- the housing side is quite dead.
Carpenter: Okay. That was Option B. I just wanted to toss that out there in case
it was going to be killed. I just want to get it considered.
Palmer: And I don't know if that's something we could do tonight anyway, or if that
would have to come back as a separate --
Carpenter: We have an application for a conditional use permit as part of it.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council -- and I don't -- I have the
development agreement up here that's the Lochsa Falls development ag reement
and I'd like to just add to the record -- because it probably is a little confusing to
folks why there is two in this relation to this area. This originally was called the
Folfer sub and it was the entire square mile. It included what is now Loch sa Falls
and what is now Kelly Creek and if you look in the record Kelly Creek was
separated out in 2003, so it was just the residential piece only and that was
because of some changes in the development process. So, that was just a piece
I wanted to add. So, all of the discussion has really been about the Lochsa Falls
portion, which talks about the single family homes, multi -family dwellings, office
buildings, commercial buildings, one city park. The land use request of the rezone
is in two parts as Mr. Carpenter just stated. So, if -- if the desire of the Council is
to split that, there is no -- there is no notice concern, because everyone has been
told that these pieces were going to be zoned -- or being requested to be rezoned
separately. So, if the Council wants to -- desire to separate that you can. We
would still need to amend -- or, excuse me, we still have to have the CUP, the --
Item 4 for the multi-family could be denied separate and apart from the other
portion. The preliminary plat for the two would be the only one that would be of
concern to me, because we don't have a preliminary plat -- at least I’m not -- I don't
see it at the moment. We have them completely separate that we could approve
one and not the other. And Josh is looking at me like he knows the answer to that.
And. then, again, we can do -- amend the existing development agreement,
because the application was seeking to separate this 12 acre parcel out of the
entire Lochsa Falls. Similar to what Kelly Creek did, but, again, that was 14 years
ago and nothing had been developed yet. But that was the ir objective and, again,
that's something that Council certainly can allow them to do. We can separate out
the development agreement and only do it for the seven point -- whatever acres of
the commercial piece and not the five acres of the other -- of the residential piece.
So -- so, Councilman Palmer's question is is can we do that or do we need another
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 66 of 99
hearing or another thing -- we probably in the findings piece would have to do a
little work to make sure it's clean, but I -- if Josh could answer that on whether we
have two plats that separated or are they all one with just simply designation?
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes. Mrs. Milam.
Milam: Just a thought on that. So, then, could we just separate the 12 acres and
not rezone the five acres? We could still separate those out, but, then, not approve
and rezone the five acres from R-4.
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Milam, yes, you
can -- you can move to do that. Like I said, my only real concern is what plat y ou
have in front of you to approve and so that would be the only reason if we -- if we
needed to to continue it to make sure we have two separate plats, so we approve
the one that we want and not the one that you don't, if that's our desire.
Milam: Thank you.
De Weerd: Josh.
Beach: I have -- I have several comments. I think that there is potential to do
several things. It gets a little bit complicated, because the first step to get the other
six application types approved is to modify the Comp rehensive Plan map
amendment to mixed use community. In order to do that we would have to make
the finding that fits with what we require for that Comprehensive Plan and for the
mixed use specifically it's a minimum of three land use types. We have made the
finding already that because there is office right next to this that we can -- we can
fit this in, but if we don't change the Comprehensive Plan map amendment we
can't get the R-40 zoning -- or the R-15 even that the applicant is looking for or
really the C-C. So, they all kind of -- they all kind of stem from that application.
So, to answer a generic question is this is just one plat. They have platted the
storage units as one lot and they have platted the other residential portion as -- I
believe it was 22 lots. So, keep in mind that if we rezone this to R-15, the next
developer can come in and it would be potentially a permitted use for apartments
there. So, if the intent is to not have multi-family, I caution you against rezoning it
to R-15 or R-40, because, then, it would be a permitted use to do what they are
wanting to do. The rezone gets them to -- and the Comprehensive Plan
amendment gets them the ability to apply for multi-family.
De Weerd: But I didn't hear anyone saying that piece. It was only in consideration
of the storage units.
Beach: Sure. Again, the storage units aren't -- aren't allowed with the current
Comprehensive Plan designation.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 67 of 99
De Weerd: Okay. That's an important clarification. Council, any other questions
for Mr. Nary or Josh?
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: A question for Mr. Carpenter, just to make sure I understood what he had
said at the end -- was if it was considered to approve that portion of the project,
which may include a comp plan amendment to permit the storage unit portion
to go forward, the remaining portion of the 12 acres would remain L-O as it
existed --
Carpenter: Yeah. I mean the read I was getting is --
De Weerd: If you will just state your name again for the record.
Carpenter: Apologize. John Carpenter.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Carpenter: The sense I got is the residential didn't -- wasn't following the
development agreement and, obviously, development agreements get changed.
A lot happens over 15 years. We can't predict out in the future. But if the Council
is going to not go along with the residential, yes, I would like to do the storage
units. My clients would. There is one applicant just the storage units and one for
the residential. I asked James Doolin before I hopped up here if he was okay for
me to ask the question and he said yes. It appears as if the residential is not going
to get approved. And I may be wrong. I appreciate your questions. Those are
great. But I wanted to toss that out as Option B. Obviously, we want it to get
approved as planned, but I just wanted to throw that option out there. So, yeah,
we would be willing to get a conditional permit just for the storage units and leave
that additional five acres as light office.
De Weerd: So, Council, you have a couple of considerations in front of you and
you could also consider to continue this to have something more specific and --
and that the -- the residents in that area would be able to provide testimony specific
to what you're asking to come back or to be considered . Not in a separate
application, but in a continuation of this discussion.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 68 of 99
Bird: I -- I don't want to see us continue it. I don't want to see us split it. These
people come in with a plan and -- and I think, as you stated, it is a nice plan and
stuff and so I'm -- I'm for one that we either go up or down tonight on it and I'm
having -- I'm having a -- quite a problem thinking of which way, you know, because
I was sitting there in 2002 when we thought we was doing something right.
Palmer: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Palmer.
Palmer: Madam Mayor, I move we close the public hearing on H-2017-0007.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 10 -
D. All those in favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Palmer: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Palmer.
Palmer: Madam Mayor, I move we approve all of H-2017-0007 as presented.
De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion.
Bird: I will second it for discussion.
De Weerd: And a second for discussion to approve Item 10-B -- or 10-D. Sorry.
Palmer: Madam Mayor, discussion?
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Palmer.
Palmer: Madam Mayor and Mr. Bird, I -- I don't think that what you did was wrong.
You said you felt like what you were doing was right back in 2002 and I'm sure it
was. But it's been 15 years. Again, we have seen a lot of change and it's -- it's
had that designation for 15 -- it could have been built as that for 15 years. It may
be if we deny this they may go build light office next month. They may -- it may sit
there another 15 years. We have no idea. But, in the meantime, I feel like the --
the project that's been proposed is quality, it fits, it's against an arterial and also
against apartments. I feel like it’s a higher quality multi-family development than
its neighbor. It's not, as ones that we have see n before, where it's immediately,
you know, a whole bunch of R-4s. You know, we recently denied another one
where that was the main concern that -- if neighbors -- are a good transition, I feel
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 69 of 99
like it's a quality project and I'd rather see it get develop ed as that than sit for a
long time and eventually something that may not be as good come along and we
approve it, because it's been sitting now for 20 years.
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: The five acres are zoned R-4; right? So, right now it's much more difficult
to find a single family home than it is to find an apartment. I think per -- I don't
know. Per -- I'm not a -- I'm not an agent. I am a landlord and I know that the
single family homes I have are -- go much faster than the attached product. That's
something that -- it isn't needed, but I very much honor and value the time of our
Planning and Zoning Commission that they put into this. As well as our citizens
who are all here saying we don't want this and I know we are talking about, you
know, 74 units -- which you're adding 74 units to another 171 units, which makes
the proportion of apartment buildings to single family homes in that square mile I
think too high, so as much as I think that they are nice enough apartme nts, I just
think it's the wrong location and that we could build -- you know, even it if was R-8
single family homes on that property that would sell very fast.
De Weerd: Any further discussion?
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: There is -- amongst everything else that's been considered and discussed,
there is a large amount of expense, time and money that goes into getting to this
stage of the development process and we rarely either pause and reflect or
continue for the purpose of -- of addressing an issue that's raised. But concerns
at least that I had lean on the residential area component of it, not the storage unit
component of it and to the extent there may be some mechanism that won't be
solved today to split these and clearly articulate the path that could allow for a
storage unit component to go forward and the residential unit to stay -- or that
portion to stay as is, that is intriguing and would be worth exploring to me, see if
that's an option in what that would look like. And in fairness to the applicant, give
them some opportunity to -- more than, you know, 20 minutes to think if that truly
is viable or if -- if they want to say it's all or nothing, respect that request as well.
But when they are tough projects like this, I'm not a big fan of -- of just making a
denial if that were to be where it may go if there is an opportunity to still save and
utilize viable portions of the project. There is a lot that goes into it, so --
Cavener: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Cavener.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 70 of 99
Cavener: To Councilman Borton's point, the motion before us isn't a motion of
denial, it's a motion to approve. Perhaps I would have different comments if this
was a motion of the deny, but as the motion before us is a motion to approve, I
think that we owe it to the applicant, staff, the time and energy -- to everyone here
to have our vote up or down, as Mr. Bird said, to approve or do not vote to approve
and if things don't go the way of approval, then, having that discussion about what
other options we want to look for.
De Weerd: Okay. Any further discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, nay; Borton, nay; Milam, nay; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, nay.
De Weerd: Motion fails.
MOTION FAILS: TWO AYES. FOUR NAYS.
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: Well, I don't have a problem of separating it out if we have a good way to
do it and I still -- I still don't think we have clarity from to know if it's -- or advice
maybe from legal and from staff. Didn't know if it -- to really have a good
understanding of -- if we can do that or not in a clean manner or if we need to have
them bring back a different --
De Weerd: Well, I guess the option is you can reopen the public hearing and
instruct staff to work with the applicant and seeing how that could happen if that is
a possibility with the application that is in front of you at this time and bring those
options back. That way the applicant and the residents will -- will know what the
proposal is moving forward and what this Council would be asked to take action
on.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: I will float a motion out that may accomplish that. First I guess I would
move to reopen the public hearing on Item H-2017-0007.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to reopen the public hearing on Item 10-
D. All those in favor say aye. All ayes.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 71 of 99
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: I would move that we continue Item H-2017-0059 for the purpose of giving
the applicant and staff an opportunity -- and the public as well -- to address the
potential and the mechanism to permit the storage unit component of the project
to proceed independent of the residential portion of the project. The report back
might describe a path that could allow it to happen. It will report back if there is not
a mechanism to do it and also the applicant has an opportunity to decide, based
upon those findings, whether they want to proceed or not. The applicant would
have an opportunity -- the applicant would have the opportunity -- as well as the
public -- at that continued hearing to provide some more final input on that definitive
plan, so the entire project would remain -- would remain potentially viable, but there
has been some clear direction that -- to the extent part of it can go forward and
part of it not, that opportunity exists and in the motion I made referenced to H-
2017-0059, which is the wrong application number. My colleague to my left -- it is
H-2017-0007 is the application that's here that we would be continuing. So, I make
a motion to continue for those reasons.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to continue this public hearing to June
--
Borton: Madam Mayor, June 6th would be great.
De Weerd: Okay.
Borton: If two weeks is enough time to accomplish that, that would be great.
De Weerd: Okay. To June 6th. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed?
Milam: Y'all come back.
De Weerd: All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
De Weerd: Okay. So this public hearing will be continued on Tuesday, June 6th.
E. Public Hearing for New Beginnings (H-2017-0026) by
Chris Fuhrman Located 780 E. Ustick Road
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 72 of 99
1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 1.00 Acre of Land
with an R-4 Zoning District
2. Request: Short Plat Approval Consisting of Two (2)
Building Lots on 0.73 of an Acre of Land
De Weerd: Okay. Item 10-E is a public hearing on H-2017-0026. I will open the
public hearing with staff comments.
Allen: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council.
De Weerd: I don't think you're on.
Allen: Excuse me. Thank you. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, the next
application before you is a request for annexation and zoning and a short plat .
This site consists of .73 of an acre of land, zoned R-4, located at 780 East Ustick
Road at the northeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Curt Drive. The
Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation for this property is low
density residential. The applicant has applied for annexation of zoning of one acre
of land with an R-4 zoning district, consistent with the corresponding future land
use map designation of low density residential and the policies in the
Comprehensive Plan as noted in the staff report. A conceptual development plan
was submitted as shown that depicts how the site is proposed to develop with two
building lots, for two single family residential homes, and a common driveway for
access to the homes via Curt Drive. Access via Ustick Road is prohibited. A short
plat is also proposed as shown there on the left that consists of two building lots
on .73 of an acre of land in a proposed R-4 zoning district. Access is proposed for
both lots via at North Curt Drive. A common driveway is proposed for access to
both lots. A 25 foot wide landscape street buffer is required along Ustick Road
and is required to be in a common lot maintained by a homeowners association .
A minimum five foot wide detached sidewalk is required to be constructed along
East Ustick Road and a minimum five foot wide attached sidewalk is required along
North Curt Drive. Conceptual building elevation of a single story home was
submitted as shown that represents the future homes in this development . As a
provision of annexation, staff is recommending a development agreement is
required that includes provisions for access and development consistent with the
proposed conceptual development plan and building elevation. Written testimony
has been received from Chris Fuhrman, the applicant. He is in agreement with the
staff report. Staff is recommending approval with the conditions in the staff report.
Staff will stand for any questions.
De Weerd: Council, any questions at this point? Does the applicant wish to testify?
Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record.
Tealey: My name is Pat Tealey. Office address 12594 Explorer in Boise.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 73 of 99
De Weerd: Thank you, Pat. Will you pull the microphone a little bit closer. Thank
you.
Tealey: I'm representing the applicant Mr. Chris Fuhrman. I won't go through all
the specifics of the application. It seems like a pretty easy application on its -- on
its face. It complies with the comp plan. We are asking for an R-4 zone, which
allows 8,000 square foot lots. We are proposing two lots, one of 10,000 and one
of 17,000. It was a short plat and it was supposed to be like an expedited process
at the City of Meridian and it's just sort of evolved. So, I wasn't expecting much. I
basically made this same presentation that the applicant agreed was staff's
evaluation of the project and I -- and I sat down and, then, I assume you read the
Planning and Zoning staff report. I also noticed that there is still a lot of people in
the audience and I -- with the last application I couldn't figure out why they would
be here for this little two lot subdivision. Well, I soon found out. The name of the
subdivision has caused quite a bit of controversy. The applicant has always, from
the beginning, stated both to the staff in the pre-application and -- and other
conversations with staff, in conversations with me, that this was a single family
subdivision. He was going to build one house for himself and sell the other off .
We had a neighborhood meeting. Nobody showed up, so we -- when we got to
the Planning and Zoning meeting we were -- I was blindsided. The applicant wasn't
here and I was really sort of upset with him as I sat there and listened to all the
comments about what was actually going to happen in this subdivision -- two lot
subdivision. It's not 74 four-plexes. I found out through the neighbors that it was
going to be homes for -- I don't even know how to classify it. I guess disadvantaged
or refugee women with children and it baffled me. It -- and I think it did everybody
else at the -- at the meeting also. Like I said, I was pretty upset at the applicant
for not telling me that this is what was goin g to happen. So, I stated in there that
this was never part of the discussion and I tried to assure the neighborhood that
that was not going to be what was going to happen and first thing I did when I got
in my truck is I called the applicant and says what the hell did you do to me? I
mean you made me look like a fool in front of these people. Well, he assured me
that -- again, that that wasn't the case. This was not going to be some church
project for disadvantaged refugee women with -- they can probably explain it. They
will come up and tell you again what it's going to be. And, then, I went and got on
the internet, because I heard discussion of the internet. That's -- well, if you look
up New Beginnings, which is the name of the subdivision, that's what I stated to
begin with is where the problem was. You looked up -- look up New Beginnings
and it is a church and it is -- what they do, evidently, is house refugee -- people
that I have been talking about. I have been assured by the client -- and he has
written e-mails to me. This is not the intention. It was just -- I guess a poor choice
of names for a subdivision and he got caught. It was -- is not his intention to do
anything at all like this. This is a single family subdivision. One of them is going
to be his home, most likely he is going to sell the other one and that's probably --
and I -- and I'm sure -- I hope that the neighbors can feel assured by this, but guess
we will find out. Any questions?
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 74 of 99
Milam: Mr. President?
Bird: Any questions? Mrs. Milam.
Milam: Pat, did he tell you why they -- how they came up with that name? My
name is Genesis and it's a church thing and that means in the beginning and all
that, so I get all that, but did he tell you where that name -- because I kind of agree,
I mean when I read it I kind of felt the same way. Especially when you only have
two homes. Unless he's like divorcing his wife and they start all over --
Tealey: I think that's more than you probably would need to know anyway, but,
yeah, a small piece of land can only support --
Milam: I was curious about the name, If he told you where the name came from?
Tealey: No, he didn't.
Bird: Any other questions? Thank you, Pat. This is a public hearing. Is there
anybody else that would like to testify? Welcome.
Garrison: Hello. My name is Matt Garrison. I live at 3280 Curt Drive, which is the
house directly behind it. So, I will give you the whole story and see if I can clear it
up, because I was blindsided, too. Chris Fuhrman came to me -- one time he was
out there looking at the lot and I was out and he intr oduced himself and said he's
the new owner of the lot and he was planning on building a single family home for
himself and he was going to build another house and either rent it to his son while
he goes to BSU or turn it into a rental later. Both my wife and I thought -- we
always knew that there was going to be something in that lot. We thought, great,
that's awesome. It's going to be a little buffer from the road for us and sounds like
great neighbors. I told him let me know when the hearing is and, obviously, I would
go and I will come support you. So, I come to the hearing and all my neighbors
are here and there is like -- can you believe what's happening and I -- I don't
understand what's happening. I'm here to support him. He's building two homes.
So, somewhere along the lines we came up with this New Beginnings thing that it
was going to be a refugee housing. My only problem with it is -- is that Chris has
never come back and talked to me directly about it and said, no, that's not what
I'm doing and there is only 13 houses in the subdivision and he's never walked
down the street and introduced himself and said, hey, that's not what's happening.
Now, if I was moving into a neighborhood I would say that's not what's happening.
I'm going to be your neighbor. Let's be good friends, you know. None of that's
ever happened. He always sent him to the meetings. He never showed up to the
meeting. So, that makes me a little leery of what might be going on. I know that
after going through zoning that there is not much can be done with this anyway.
I'm aware of that. I do have some questions for you if I can get real quick. My
question is who, if anyone, regulates or approves that sort of housing if it was going
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 75 of 99
to be a multiple family or something like that? Is there any agency that they have
to go through to get a permit?
De Weerd: I can't answer that. Mr. Chatterton.
Chatterton: Madam Mayor, it depends, again, on what you're talking about. If
you're talking about -- the way I just heard this New Beginnings, which I guess
came off the internet, described as a treatment or group home for -- for refugees?
Garrison: That's correct. We understand that they are allowed to have up to ten
residents -- nonfamily residents in a house in Meridian.
De Weerd: So -- I'm still running this meeting kind of. I appreciate you all having
a conversation, but why don't we get your questions --
Garrison: Okay.
De Weerd: -- and will have them answered all once.
Garrison: Okay. So, that -- we understand that. So, I would just want to know if
-- if going forward there is two houses going in there and all of a sudden this does
take place, is there some sort of application process that they have to go through
to put ten residents in the house or is that just, you know, allowed? If that is
allowed, I will tell you that you're going to have a very large problem with parking
on Curt Drive with a stop sign right. There will be no room for -- I guess what would
be 20 people, say ten of them have cars, to park and -- and I'm going to be that
neighbor. I'm going to be that neighbor. I will not let it go by and I will be the
neighbor the calls every time there is a car longer than it should be. I will learn all
the rules. So, I don't know if there is a process. I'm comfortable with it being two
single family dwelling homes. I love that. That's a great idea. I just wanted to
know if there was a process that I will be alerted that that's going to happen the
other way. Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: Madam Mayor, Tim Ratliff signed up as neutral and does not wish to testify.
Kim Shootson signed up as neutral and does not wish to testify. And John and
Lisa Villanueva signed up -- actually no indication of in favor or against, but did not
wish to testify. And that was all for the public hearing sign-in sheet.
De Weerd: Mr. Chatterton, can you perhaps share any insight you have on these
kind of group homes or is there a regulatory agency that -- that oversees that?
Chatterton: Madam Mayor. First, again, to reiterate that we have no indication
that these particular two single family homes would be used for a group home.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 76 of 99
De Weerd: We understand that.
Chatterton: And Mr. Nary can probably give you the legal definitions better than I,
but, effectively, a group home is a provision under federal law that allows the
housing of individuals with disabilities in -- in group settings and the -- without going
into too much detail, regulatory agencies, cities, counties are not allowed to --
really, the test is you're not allowed to regulate them more than you would a single
family home. That is these unrelated individuals are considered a family under --
under federal law. We -- there is no permit process for this. Anyone living in the
City of Meridian in a subdivision could have a group home move in next to them .
The city doesn't know where all the group homes are , nor are we allowed to
necessarily pierce that veil. We have to be very careful with that.
De Weerd: Okay. We know that. But is there an agency that does look for health
safety, any kind of oversight. Any agency --
Chatterton: I'm not aware of that. In the case of halfway houses, often you have
the Department of Corrections involved, sometimes you have Health and Welfare
involved with those. They are not regulatory agencies, they are partner agencies
in that case. That's my understanding of -- of halfway houses. As far as -- I think
it depends on where the money comes from for such things. Again, we have no
indication that that's what these single family homes would be used for, any more
than any other single family home anywhere in Meridian would be used for a group
home.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary, anything you wish to add?
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, so -- I mean Bruce is a hundred
percent on. All we have the authority under this application is to whether to allow
this property be annexed and allow the property to be divided into two parcels.
Who lives in it, what it looks like -- all of that, the only standards we have are our
building standards and that's the only decision point for this Council. Everything
else beyond that is not allowed, would definitely be something a court would have
serious concern with and we only can make this -- you know, we cannot make a
decision based an assumption.
De Weerd: And I don't think that was the question. The question that the citizen
asked was is there an oversight by any kind of governmental agency and I don't
know that answer.
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, the only other thing I can think of
from what Bruce stated is refugees in this country are regulated by the federal
government through the Department of Homeland Security. So, when refugees
are placed in communities, in this state and other states, those are all done through
the federal government and none of it's done at the local level. So, is there any
warning or meetings or hearings -- generally not, but it would depend on the federal
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 77 of 99
regulations that I'm not familiar with the specifics, but I'm not aware there is public
meetings about those that are required.
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Is there any person who would like to testify that
didn't sign up? Okay. Any final comments from the applicant?
Tealey: Pat Tealey. As far as why I'm the one representing Mr. Fuhrman, he hired
me to do that and that's my job. I'm not in cahoots with him. If -- if he turns this
into what they are talking about I'm going to be just as mad as the neighbors are,
because it would appear that I'm not representing something faithfully in front of
the Council that I have to come in front of again. I just don't do that. So -- and
they did have -- I assumed that they had a chance to comment at the neighborhood
meeting, which Mr. Fuhrman held and nobody showed up. So, maybe some of
that could have been clear up prior to. Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any further information needed? Is there
additional testimony? If you will, please, state your name and address for the
record.
Villanueva: My name John Villanueva. I live at 3466 North Curt Drive in Meridian.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Villanueva: I was never made aware of any meeting with Mr. Fuhrman as far as
to discuss a neighborhood meeting at all. I was just told that houses were going
to be built and we did a little bit of research and looked into it and I feel the same
as that -- in the idea that I think it's kind of odd that he's not here representing
himself and if it really was his intention to build single family homes for himself
maybe he would talk to us. There is only a few of us there. He could talk to us
and settle us down. That's just not the way -- he's coming across at this time. But,
really, it appears that there is not much we can do. So, I appreciate you listening
to me. Thank you for your time.
De Weerd: Thank you. And I will tell you it's not unusual to have the
representative, not the property owner. That's more our experience. Any further
testimony? Did I -- okay. Council, anything further?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Hearing nothing, I move we close the public hearing on H-2017-0026.
Milam: Second.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 78 of 99
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in
favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: As Mr. Nary so nicely stated, we are just passing on an annexation and
zoning request and a short plat approval and it seems like he had jumped through
all the hoops, so I would make a motion that we approve H-2017-0026 with
applicant and staff comments.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close -- or to approve Item 10-E. Any
discussion? Mr. Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
F. Public Hearing for Rockbury Subdivision (H-2017-0018)
by Rock Harbor Church, Inc. Located 6437 N. Tree
Haven Way
1. Request: Rezone of 25.06 Acres of Land from R-15
(8.95 Acres) and C-N (16.11 Acres) to R-15 (6.71
Acres) and C-N (18.35 Acres) Zoning Districts
2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Two
(2) Common Lots, One (1) Commercial Lot and One
(1) Multi-Family Lot on 23.56 Acres of Land in the
Proposed R-15 and C-N Zoning Districts
3. Request: Variance to Allow a Limited Access (Right-
In/Right-Out) Through a Shared Driveway onto
Chinden Boulevard
4. Request: To be Removed from the Existing
Development Agreement for Tree Farm (Inst.
#106151518) and to be Placed in a Separate
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 79 of 99
Development Agreement for this Development
De Weerd: Item 10-F is a public hearing for H-2017-0018. I will open this public
hearing with staff comment.
Palmer: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Palmer.
Palmer: Real quick if I might disclose that the applicant is the largest renter of my
family -- my parents' building, though I have no financial interest in that building or
anything else that they do. So, I just wanted to disclose that. But I do plan on
participating in the discussion and voting.
De Weerd: Thank you for that disclosure.
Little Roberts: And Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: I feel like I should also disclose that that is the church that my family
and I attend, although do not benefit financially from attendance and I wanted it on
the record that that is our home church.
De Weerd: I have to reveal I have gone to that church and still watch their -- their
sermons online. But I will not financially gain either. I do spiritually gain, though.
I will say that.
Nary: Madam Mayor, just for the record, if you don't mind, for the Council and for
the public record, we did receive these requests from Council Members in regards
to their interaction and under the Idaho Code and Council Member Palmer and
Council Member Little Roberts hit on that -- the Council -- the code requires some
financial interest personally to the Council Member or a member of their
household. So, even though it may be Council Member Palmer's family, since he
doesn't reside there or receive financial benefit from that and Mrs. Little Roberts
merely attends that congregation, neither of tho se violate the Idaho Code. So, I
just wanted to make that clear for the record.
Palmer: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Palmer.
Palmer: I just wanted to make sure no item went without a little drama, so --
De Weerd: Because we haven't had any yet. Okay. Josh.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 80 of 99
Beach: Very good, Madam Mayor. This is an application for four application types
associated with this. It's a rezone of approximately 25.6 acres of land from R-15
and C-N to R-15 and C-N. They are just modifying the dimensions of those slightly.
Request for a preliminary plat consisting of two common lots, one commercial lot
and one multi-family lot on 23.56 acres of land in the proposed R-15 and C-N
zoning districts. Request for a variance to allow a limited access right-in, right-out
through a shared driveway to Chinden Boulevard. A request to be removed from
the existing development agreement for the Tree Farm Subdivision and to be
placed in a separate development agreement for this specific project . So, having
said that, the site consist of, as I said, approximately 25.6 acres, which is currently
zoned R-15 and C-N, located at 6437 North Tree Haven Way. A little history on
this project. The property received annexation in 2006 and conceptual approval
to develop a mixed use community consisting of single family residential,
townhomes, multi-family and neighborhood commercial, which was known as the
Tree Farm Development. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map
designation is medium density residential. As I said, the applicant is proposing to
rezone -- not two different zoning designations, but to slightly modify the current
zoning designation to fit what their desired use of the property is. A development
agreement modification, as I said, to remove this project from the current
development agreement and to place it in their own, maybe tied to their elevation
and any conceptual site plan. The applicant's current desire -- as I can move on
to the -- this is the current Tree Farm designation for the property and as you can
see here in the box it's varied uses proposed for this piece. Their preliminary plat
consist of, as I said, essentially, two lots, an R-15 lot here on the north side. It
would be just one lot currently and proposed it would have to come back before
the Planning and Zoning and City Council for further subdivision in the future and
the church being proposed would be on the southern portion up against Chinden
Boulevard. So, staff has reviewed the proposed plat for compliance with the
applicable standards in the UDC. Access for the property at this time -- the primary
access into the development is North Tree Farm Way via Chinden Boulevard. This
roadway will eventually be extended through the adjacent property, intersect with
Black Cat Road, and insuring the primary access from Chinden Boulevard, as I
said, North Tree Farm Way. The UDC does require Council waiver for two access
points currently proposed to North Tree Farm Way. So, as you can see here on
the site plan, the applicant is proposing -- applying for a variance to have a
secondary right -- right-out access onto Chinden -- onto Chinden Boulevard. It
does require a Council action. Moving on to the conceptual elevations. The
applicant has submitted sample elevations to depict the design of the church
proposed for Lot 2, Block 1, of the subdivision. The church elevations incorporate
glass, metal ownings, stucco, two variations in metal siding and transition wall
panels. In general staff is supportive of the proposed building elevations . Further
refinement of the church elevations proposed on Lot 2, Block 1, should comply
with the submitted conceptual elevations and comply with the design standards.
So, the building will have to come through certificate of zoning compliance and
design review. A little history from the Planning and Zoning Commission. The
Commission did recommend approval of the project. It was heard on April 20th.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 81 of 99
Scott Wonders and Scott Harrop are in favor. In opposition was Robert Neufelt.
Commenting were Robert Ebert, Tom McNeill, Jamie Koozie, Robert Nuefelt and
Denise LeFevre. Written -- written testimony was received by Robert Ebert. I
was the staff that presented the application. Bill Parsons also commented. Key
issues of public testimony for this application were traffic through the area,
especially on North Tree Farm Way and has been increasing recently. Concerns
about the amount of traffic through the area and for pedestrian safety. Discussions
about how the addition of berms on the property would g reatly reduce noise.
Concerns about the lack of parking for the residences and where the guests would
park. The issues of discussion by the Commission were discussions about berms
and what is required by the city versus required by ITD. Potential for alternative
compliance to reduce or remove the berms from along Chinden Boulevard. The
Commission changes to staff's recommendations were to modify condition 1.1.1C
to read as follows: The applicant shall coordinate with ITD on the amount of right
away required adjacent to Chinden Boulevard in accord with UDC 11-3H. So, a
little clarification on -- on that specific item. We were afforded a plan by ITD that
indicated a certain amount -- a letter from them indicating a certain amount of right-
of-way width on Chinden would be required. We, then, referenced a plan for that
and there was discrepancy. So, we wanted to make sure that that specific thing
was ironed out. So, we left that kind of vague, so that we could ascertain the exact
amount that would be required. I think we have -- we have reached that. Add
condition 1.2.4 to read as follows: Prior to the City Council hearing the applicant
shall provide a horizontal elevated landscape plan. Modify condition 1.1.1D to read
as follows: The existing tenants and businesses shall vacate the premises by
December 31st, 2017. There is some existing structures on the property with
existing tenants and wanted to make sure that those tenants were out of there
fairly soon with the development of this project. Modify Condition 1.2.2 to read as
follows: Construct a 35 foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to Chinden Boulevard
as proposed. If the unimproved street right of way along West Chinden Boulevard
is ten feet or greater from the edge of pavement, to edge of sidewalk or property
line, the streetlighting project is not in the transportation authority's five year funded
plan. The developer is required to maintain a ten foot wide compacted gravel
shoulder meeting the construction -- construction standards of the transportation
authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or vegetative ground cover in
accord with the UDC. The applicant shall enter into a license agreement for the
landscape improvements within the right of way. I realized that was a very long
condition. Add Condition 1.1.1F to read as follows: The applicant shall either
install the berm along Chinden Boulevard as required by the UDC or apply and
receive approval for alternative compliance. The only outstanding issue before the
Council is the variance request for a direct access to -- to Chinden Boulevard. With
that I will stand for any questions.
De Weerd: Council, any questions for Josh at this time? Okay. Thank you. Good
evening. Thank you for sticking with us.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 82 of 99
Wondesr: Good evening. Scott Wonders. JUB. 250 South Beachwood in Boise.
Here representing Rock Harbor Church, the applicant on the project. I also have
Pastors Keith Harrington and Scott Harrop with me tonight should you have any
questions in regards to the church itself, operations, et cetera. I believe we are in
agreement with all the conditions that were modified at the Planning and Zoning.
I will go through a little bit of history. This piece was zoned, obviously, with the
Tree Farm development in 2006. It was zoned R-15 and C-N. We are just
modifying it slightly after the zoning and through the process of development the
Settlers Canal was tiled through there, so we have a 40 foot easement that kind of
zig zags through here that we have tried to accommodate in the site plan and it
just made a logical boundary between the C-N and R-15. So, that's why we are
modifying the zoning slightly to accommodate that. Obviously, we have the
preliminary plat, new development agreement and the variance request for the
right-end, right-out along Chinden. When the church was looking at this property
late last fall, they started engaging with the Spurwing HOA and the developers to
figure out what the issues were and meeting with the board and, obviously, traffic
was the number one issue that seemed to be coming up repeatedly in this area .
Obviously, there was another zoning -- or not a zoning. Another preliminary plat
recently, just to the northwest of here. And the fact that Tree Farm doesn't connect
to Black Cat and Black Cat to Chinden quite yet. So, we looked at ways of
modifying the plan -- or actually designed the plan to accommodate for as many
ingresses and egresses as we possibly could, knowing a church doesn't have a lot
of daily trips Monday through Saturday for that matter and really only has, you
know, a small peak for about four hours on Sundays. But knowing that and
knowing that the conditions that are out there, we looked at adding ingresses and
egresses. We have the two that were pretty much there off of Tree Haven Way,
with the existing preliminary plat and, then, we added, in addition to that, a northerly
exit onto Tree Farm Way, which you see on the very northwest corner of the
property, kind of shaded in grey. That would be a shared access with the property
to the west that is proposed to be commercial in the future and, then, also in right-
in, right-out onto Chinden at the very southwest corner, which, again, would be a
shared drive with a commercial -- for future commercial to the west in the future.
We met with ITD. It does meet their spacing criteria. We have not submitted a
traffic study or an application. We are coming to the City Council to request a
variance for this access prior to moving forward with the traffic study and the
application. But I have met with them at least four times now on this specific
application and it's a quarter mile spacing in either direction and it does meet their
criteria. I did get to the right-of-way classification. They are requesting a hundred
feet north of center line from this location and we have adjusted our site plan to
accommodate for that future right of way and for the required buffer that's required
by code. Right before Planning and Zoning -- literally the day before or even that
morning, we found out that there is a stipulation in Meridian code that requires a
ten foot buffer along Chinden, just because it -- I always thought it was applied to
residential that were immediately adjacent to Chinden, but there was a provision
in there for schools and churches. But knowing that this was commercial all along,
the intention was never to create to be foot berm along here and so although we
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 83 of 99
were providing intermittent berms -- and I don't know if, Josh, you can zoom into
that landscape section along Chinden, it -- we are proposing like four to six foot
high or four to five high berming intermittently along Chinden and so if we are
required to stick with the UDC criteria for that, we are fine with that. W e have
actually commissioned an acoustical engineer to provide a sound study that we --
I actually provided to the city on Friday that we will use in the future for the
alternative compliance and, basically, what it's saying is that -- that for a ten foot
berm the only person that really benefits from those high terms are those that are
immediately on the adjacent side of that and as you get further and further away
from that berm, the impacts or the reduction in noise is not -- it's not beneficial and
it's to about a distance of 250 to 300 feet alone, just quoting the memo from the
acoustical engineers. So, our intention all along was to provide berming within all
of our landscape buffers, although they are just going to be, you know, more of an
aesthetic aspect where there is going to be, you know, varying in heights and
intermittent and not like a solid, uniform berm that's planted to death to provide an
ultimate screen. So, that's kind of where we are at with that. A little bit of history
on Rock Harbor. It sounds like some of you may already know, but they are current
-- you currently use Rock Harbor -- or excuse me. Rocky Mountain High School
for the last five years and start out with just a handful and now they have pretty
much reached capacity for that area and so this is going to be, obviously, the new
home for Rock Harbor Church. The initial phase is going to be about a 45 to 50
thousand square foot facility with an ultimate configuration of possibly reaching
73,000 square feet. All the existing tenants -- I think, again, it was kind of clarified
that we are requesting that those tenants just vacate those existing buildings on
the site by the end of the year. When Rock Harbor purchased the property there
was some existing leases to those buildings, even though we now know that they
were not in conformance with I guess city code, but they just want to honor those
leases until the end of the year and, then, they will -- those buildings will actually
be taken down with the process of building the new church and that, which leads
me to the timing for the church, which is always very important. So, their goal
would be to be in this new facility by the spring of 201 9. So, basically, two years
from now. It will take about another eight to nine months to detail the plans and
get them submitted and approved through the city and, then, obviously, almost a
year or just about a year to construct the facility. So, from a timing aspect it would
be spring of 2019. And I believe that's everything I have and I could stand for any
questions you may have.
De Weerd: Council, any questions for the applicant? Okay.
Wonders: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: Dirk Benatri signed up on the sheet with no indication for or against and no
indication of testimony.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 84 of 99
De Weerd: Would you like to come forward? You need to talk on the record. I
apologize. If you will state your name and address for the record.
Benatri: Yes. I'm Dirk Benatri and I live at 6458 North Pira Avenue in Spurwing.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Benatri: I recommend approval of the variance request for that extra road. The
road -- the burden on that road is already going to be crazy, as we know from the
other subdivision that got, apparently, a variance to Black Cat Road out. So, we
are already having trouble getting out in the morning as it is and it's only going to
get worse. And it's all compounded with Chinden and that -- that sort of thing. And
I need to reiterate, I guess, looking at what was said, that, you know, I really think
the state and the city are a little -- a little bit behind on all of this when they -- when
they allow unbridled growth of this area -- and I just see it all over the place and I
look for different ways to get to work all the time. I work at the hospital downtown
and in Meridian and it's -- it's difficult and Chinden is just a turd show and, for lack
of better words, it is a mess, it is a disgrace. It really is. There is just way too much
traffic on it. I just -- and I have to avoid it and it's getting worse and it's going to
continue to get worse and you know the state doesn't have the solution for it. So,
that's --
De Weerd: You need to speak in the microphone.
Benatri: -- on everybody to do something about it. The leadership here. The city
with the state.
De Weerd: We certainly agree with you and I hope you're part of our Chinden
Boulevard mailing list and -- and use your voice every time you absolutely can . I
want you to know that the traffic on Chinden is not just Meridian cars.
Benatri: Oh, no. I understand that.
De Weerd: And that will -- and that growth is not just for Meridian, too, so, we -- I
will say I am in full agreement with you, that that road needs widening and we do
have legislators that are working and trying to get funding options, but there is not
a whole lot of tools out there right now.
Benatri: It's getting less and less safe. I mean the state -- state got up on 44, they
took care of State, they took care of Eagle after a lot of years, but they just forgot
about Chinden.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: Glen Humphrey signed up as neutral with no indication of testimony.
Marsha Dennis signed up in favor with no indication of testimony. Tom Marene
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 85 of 99
signed up as neutral and does wish to testify. I apologize if I mispronounced your
last name.
De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and
address for the record.
McNeill: Hi. I'm Tom McNeill. I live at 4221 West Greenspire. We are at the
corner of Tree Haven and Tree Farm. So, we are impacted by this property
development a great deal. I'm also -- and I'm going to take my -- I can't say -- I do
need to say things three times. I am a member of the board -- two boards in
Spurwing, so it says I get to talk longer that way, so whether I will or not --
De Weerd: You are a spokesperson then?
McNeill: I am. I'm the only one from the board that is here. If you would indulge
me. I, first of all, would like to say that the church has done a magnificent job of
being a new neighbor. They have approached us again and again and again and
let us know what they wanted to do. So, I am in favor of their project. The issues
I have have to be addressed in some fashion and it might even be as simple as
you -- that the City Council gets the swim center and library back on the ballot and
-- and let us see if we can support that , so we can get Black Cat -- the Black Cat
has to be developed for -- in order for this property -- especially the R-15 property
to be successful. I do know a little bit about the numbers of this. There was a
traffic study last fall and interestingly enough ACHD did it in October. They said
the -- the -- what that traffic light can support is 2,900 vehicles through it a day. In
October was 3,095. So, even with that information we should have been at a
meeting with you with the M3 Development with the northwest corner of this
development and that was approved without our neighborhood being in that and,
let me tell you, we would have been -- because they are coming right by our -- they
are using our -- our road, which I know is a county road, but -- so, when this R-15
is developed we are not going to have -- M3 doesn’t have to develop Black Cat
until they have the 91st lot sold in their development. So, we have a possibility of
another 90 homes going in this six acres here and Black Cat with no agreement
and I know that we still have Planning and Zoning that has to happen with that
property, but this road, Tree Farm, is -- it's falling apart because of the amount of
traffic that goes over it right now and even though the church only impacts it on --
on Sunday, it's going to be an impact. I'm so glad they are doing the right-in, right-
out. You have to -- that's the only way that it's going to work at all and, then, I'm
going to really try to communicate with the church members -- please go right.
Don't try to use Tree Farm, that light, because the light right now with what we
have, will have ten or 15 cars backed up at that light and you can get four or five
at the most to get through in the mornings. So, that is the biggest issue we have
with the project is the traffic and you will hear this -- how many times have we
heard that tonight on traffic, traffic, traffic and Chinden -- since I become a board
member I have been with the ACHD planning committee and their plans on
Chinden are grand, but we will all be retired and many of us may be gone before
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 86 of 99
they are completed and it's -- it's sad that we don't have the finances and unlimited
resources for that. But that is the way it is. So, if you can figure out a way that we
can get the swim center going again, that's your proposal, I will support you, I will
come and speak and -- I don't think you had a good enough PR last time. So,
that's -- Black Cat has to be developed. Just has to be and city dollars is going to
have to come into that sometime. That's all I got at this time. Thank you.
Palmer: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Palmer.
Palmer: I see Justin squirming back there, taking ownership of Chinden. Chinden
is an ITD as a state highway.
De Weerd: It still needs to be fixed. We don't care who owns it. It needs to be
fixed. Mr. Clerk.
Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Lisa Queverson signed up as neutral, with no
indication of testimony. And Denise Hansen -- and apologize, I cannot figure out
the last name. LeFevre. Signed up as neutral, but wishes to testify.
De Weerd: Good evening. Thank you for sticking with us. If you will, please, state
your name and address.
Lefevre: Denise Hanson Lefevre. 6706 North Salvia Way. I am part of the
Spurwing group and the neighborhood and I'd like to say I am pro development. I
am pro the church. I think they have done a really good job of commenting to the
neighbors and I'd really like to see the variance approved, the right-out onto
Chinden and if this -- if I read this site map correctly, they did take into
consideration the flow out onto the eventual way out to Black Cat onto the north
there, so if I read that correctly and they do plan on putting that -- that exit onto the
North Tree Farm onto Black Cat, I'm absolutely ecstatic and look forward to having
a good neighbor. So, that's all I have to say and I hope they use it more than
Sundays. I hope they find other uses to use the church, in the evenings and in
daycares and whatever else they would like to do with it. So, that's all I have to
say.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Coles: There were no other sign-ups, Madam Mayor.
De Weerd: Okay. Is there anyone else who wishes to provide testimony? Okay.
Would the applicant like to provide final comments?
Wonders: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Council Members. Scott Wonders again for
the record. Just a brief couple items to cover -- the R-15 was left as one lot.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 87 of 99
Obviously, the church are not developers, so they are just going to end up holding
onto that lot and maybe have someone else purchase that lot and come back om
with an R-15 development at a future date. So, that was why it was just merely
left as one lot. To clarify, yes, there is going to be a secondary access to Tree
Farm Way that we are requesting and that is one point that -- in the staff report
there is a waiver that I guess we are needing to request for that for ha ving two
access points off of Tree Farm Way along that section, one for the church and,
then, obviously, the one for the R-15 parcel and one of the items for that location
of that entrance, as you see there, that's immediately to the east of our -- the
church's entrance, we kind of strategically put that access at that location and that
was the way it was originally shown on the -- on the previous plan, just to kind of
focus the traffic to the west and into Black Cat and not so much back on Tree Farm
Way and Tree Haven Way. So, it was kind of a strategic location for that. So,
other than that I can stand for any other questions that you might have.
De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Okay.
Wonders: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Council, any questions for staff?
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: Mr. Nary, are there specific findings we need to put into a motion with
regards to the variance? Unique characteristics or otherwise or not?
Nary: Well, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Borton, I
guess I'm a little tiny bit confused and -- there is an application letter in here from
the applicant for a variance. That's not discussed at the Planning and Zoning level,
because it only can be granted by the Council. There is discussion in the staff
report about the variance, but there is no findings suggested, either approval or
denial, by staff. I heard the applicant say he still needs to apply for the variance
and do a traffic study. So, to me I think we are premature in granting a variance
without enough information. But to answer your question specifically Idaho Code
67-6516 requires specific findings in regards to variances and requires that the
applicant, upon a showing of undue hardship because of characteristics of the site,
that the variance is not in conflict with the public interest. So, that's a specific
finding and when it talks about undue hardship in the -- both in the code and the
case law, undue hardship is something that's not created by the property owner,
but created by the geographic dimensions and topography of the property itself .
So, those would be the findings you would have to make, but it seems -- and maybe
I'm missing something that I didn't see in the report, but it seems like we are
premature to grant a variance at this point.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 88 of 99
Borton: Madam Mayor. That's -- that's the question. We can provide direction,
but the actual application itself has not yet been presented?
De Weerd: Well, this was listed as one of the outstanding issues for City Council.
Beach: So, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, the question -- did they apply
for a variance? And the answer is, yes, if that's the question. I guess I want to
make sure that was actually the question for Mr. Nary.
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. So, yeah, the question was -- I
see that in the documents of the application that there was an application for that.
I heard the applicant say he still needed to apply for it and do a traffic study. In
looking at the staff report, there is no findings to either approve or deny this based
on the code. So, that's the information that Council doesn't have to make a
decision on on whether or not it complies with the code or it doesn't.
De Weerd: Is there anything you would like to add? It's number three on our
agenda, the variance, so --
Wonders: Scott Wonders again for the record. What we are requesting is the --
because we need the variance for the right-in, right-out, that's what we are
requesting and I think we would be looking for maybe a conditional approval of the
variance, subject to the ITD permit. It's just a matter of submitting the right-of-way
application and the traffic study that supports the turn lane dimensions, which is
what it would be required and we were hoping to grant -- or obtain that variance
through the city first before applying for the right -of-way permit through ITD, just
because it involves some additional expenses to the church that we are trying to
avoid, just to make sure that you guys -- being the City Council would be
acceptable to the variance subject to that condition. I hope that helps. Thanks.
Beach: Madam Mayor, real quick if I might. Mr. Nary, looking to the staff report,
on page 34 there are findings for a variance, if that's -- Item 3 under the findings.
Had me in a panic for a minute. I would also mention that we did receive a letter
from -- you probably all received this, but from ITD indicating no objection to the
construction of the church on the property and they discussed the access, but you
have probably already all read that. But we do have comments from ITD, so --
Nary: So, Madam Mayor. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I apologize,
So, I do see Josh's findings. I was confused when he was talking about the
application, I thought he was talking about hours and it appears the application
was talking about the ITD application for the access point, not an application
through us. So, I apologize for my confusion. And there are -- there are three
findings here on page 35 of the staff report that do address the specifics of the
Idaho Code.
De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions?
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 89 of 99
Borton: Everybody pass the variance.
Bird: Yeah.
De Weerd: Okay.
Milam: Conditionally.
De Weerd: Do I have a motion to close the public hearing?
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Borton.
Borton: I would move to close of public hearing on Item H-2017-0018.
Little Roberts: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in
favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Borton: Unless I get a nod from legal counsel otherwise, I'm going to make motion
that would address all four components of it. I would move that we approve Item
H-207-0018 in all respects to and including the variance request with the findings
set forth in the staff report, the proposed findings which justify the unique
characteristics of this parcel and its physical components, that the variance is
warranted. So, that -- the entire application to be approved.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion?
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: Obviously that's conditional upon verbal from ITD on the variance.
Bird: Yeah.
Borton: Correct. It's -- it's all the permission that we can grant.
De Weerd: Okay. Any further discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 90 of 99
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 11: Department Reports
A. Finance: Agreements
1. Approval of Award of RFP and Agreement to Enviro-
Care for the “PERFORATED PLATE SCREENS
EQUIPMENT” for the Headworks Expansion project
for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $522,400.00. This
agreement is being funded in two fiscal years: 2017
(Oct. 2016 – Sept. 2017) $52,240.00; 2018 (Oct. 2017
– Sept. 2018) $470,160.00.
2. Approval of Award of RFP and Agreement to JWC
Environmental for the “WASHER COMPACTOR
EQUIPMENT” for the Headworks Expansion project
for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $309,750.00. This
agreement is being funded in two fiscal years: 2018
(Oct. 2017 – Sept. 2018) $278,775.00; 2019 (Oct.
2018 – Sept. 2019) $30,975.00.
3. Approval of Supply Agreement to APSCO, LLC for the
“Hidrostal Pumps for the WRRF Headworks
Expansion” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount
of $1,165,737.00 with 2017 spending authority of
$233,174.40.
4. Award of Bid and Approval of Construction Contract
to The Ewing Company, Inc. for the “WRRF
Headworks Capacity Expansion” project for a Not-To-
Exceed amount of $9,729,000.00 with 2017 spending
authority of $4,075,037.00
De Weerd: Okay. Item 11-A is under our Finance Department.
Watts: Good evening Madam Mayor, Council Members. Not to make you feel
bad, but about 9:30 I went out for a walk tonight and it's an absolutely beautiful
evening tonight. Ty will have a nice drive home.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 91 of 99
De Weerd: Well, thank you so much for telling us that.
Watts: I have four contracts before you tonight for the wastewater headworks
project and the reason that we are doing a department report was, again, instead
of on Consent Agenda is these four contracts are all being funded over multiple
fiscal years, multiple budgets, and they have different amounts, of course, for this
FY-17 and '18 and a couple into '19 as well. I will start off with the first contract
before you and that's the perforated plate screens. That was an RFP that we had
issued. We ended up getting four responses to that and we have selected Enviro-
Pure as the vendor. I guess I will go back and state one more item for these
contracts. The reason why these mechanical or equipment supplier contracts are
being split over the fiscal year is we don't need them right now, but we have got to
get the orders placed in order to get them in the manufacturing queue. So, that's
the reason to split these into fiscal years. The perforated plate screens is 522,400
dollars with 52,240 requested for this fiscal year and an estimated -- or, actually, it
is an exact amount of 471,061 fiscal year '18. That's the balance of that contract
upon delivery. Would you like me to go through all of them and then -- okay. And,
then, our next one is for a washer compactor. We issued an RFP on that piece of
equipment as well. These were all formal RFPs that were issued, advertised, and
left open for quite some time. We did only receive one proposal on the washer
compactor. The cost on that one was 309,750. We -- I negotiated a contract with
these folks to eliminate the need for a payment performance bond on it and not
take -- not have any payments due until delivery. So, there is no funding required
this fiscal year on that contract. That saves the city about 30,000 or so on that --
what they were waiting for a supply bond. Our third contract is for hydrostal pumps.
There is six pumps in this contract. This was a sole source that was brought before
Council -- see if I can find my date here. That was October of 2016 is when we
got the sole source. Finished going through the design process, negotiating the
contract, and now we have that contract here before you. That contract is
1,165,737 for all six pumps, with 233,174.40 being requested for FY-17 and
932,562.60 for next fiscal year '18 on delivery. And the last contract that we had
that's for the construction contract for the headworks project . That was a bid that
we went out and did pre-qualifications of the general contractors for. We had five
contractors, I believe, prequalified. We received four bids from those five
contractors. Ewing Company was the low bid at 9,728,000 dollars and we are
requesting 4,075,037 dollars for fiscal year '17. 5,439,316 was the estimate for
'18. It will be dependent upon construction. And, then, 214,647 in '19 is the
estimate. The total of these contracts for the FY-17 request is 4,360,451 and we
have ample budget with a signif icant amount remaining to go on FY-17.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 92 of 99
Bird: Just a statement. Keith, I appreciate you staying and doing this with these
contracts, because it's nice for the public -- not only us to know, but the public also.
I see that -- that from now until October 1st John is going to have approximately
40 percent of his work done?
Watts: He may be a little overexaggerating the amount of work he's going to
complete in the next few months, but that is his estimate. I talked to John Monday
-- or, actually, I think last Friday, John came in and we talked for a while and he
thinks he can hit that. But he does think it's conservative, so --
Bird: I wouldn't want to be in Tuck's shoes. Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: If we don't have any questions, I would move that we approve and award the
RFP and agreement to Viral Care for perforated screens and equipment for the
headworks and in the amount of 52,240 dollars.
Borton: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion?
Watts: That contract -- excuse me --
Bird: Oh, you want the whole amount?
Watts: Well, the contract is getting written for the entire amount, but the fiscal year
funding -- as we do have the funding clauses --
Bird: That's just what I forgot to add.
Watts: Yes.
Bird: All these contracts are going out for the full amount.
Watts: Yes.
Bird: Okay.
Watts: We are writing the contract language for the full amount with the funding
clauses --
Bird: We are doing something we have done before if we are not.
Watts: Correct. So --
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 93 of 99
Bird: Okay.
Watts: -- every contract is dependent on the Council funding those additional fees
in the subsequent years.
Bird: So, I change the amount to 470,160 dollars and RFP -- an agreement with
JWC Environmental for a total amount of 309,750 dollars and an agreement with
APSCO, LLC, for the total amount of $233,174.40.
Watts: Excuse me, Councilman Bird.
Bird: Yeah.
Watts: The total dollar amount of that contract is 1,165,737. The APSCO contract.
And I'm not positive, but --
Bird: Oh, I see that. I'm sorry.
Watts: And also I might need to correct the perforated plate screens Enviro-Care.
That was 522,400 and I think it might have got stated at 470,160.
Bird: 470,160?
De Weerd: One sixty.
Watts: Yeah. It would be '18 fiscal year funding, but the total cost of that contract
is 522,400 dollars.
Bird: Yeah.
Watts: And, then, if I may make a statement also before we get to the headworks
contract. John has contacted me, as has JWC company that the -- I know we
spoke briefly about the manufacturers prices fluctuating. The HDPE pipe has gone
up approximately about 20 percent in the last six or seven months and so with this
contract John has brought it to my attention that before we executed this contract
his prices have gone up in excess of 50,000 dollars from bid time to award today.
I let John know there is nothing in our language that allows me to move forward
with any -- we do not have escalation language in our contracts for fluctuations in
manufacturers' prices.
Bird: They will just have to bring forward a --
Watts: Yeah. So, I just wanted to -- just to make you aware of that, that we may
be coming forward in the future to have a discussion .
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 94 of 99
Bird: Now that I have gobbled up everything else, I will go to number four and
award the bid and approval of construction contract to Ewing Company in the
amount for a not to exceed amount of nine million seven hundred and twenty -nine
dollars -- and if he has more he brings it forward.
De Weerd: So, 9,729,000.
Bird: Yeah. 9,729,000.
De Weerd: It's late.
Watts: It is.
De Weerd: So, your motion is to approve Item 11 -A, one, two, three and four.
Bird: Yeah.
De Weerd: Do I have a second?
Borton: Second.
De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Mr. Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Watts: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you, Keith.
Borton: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Thanks for sticking around. Yes, Mr. Borton.
Borton: I would love to have had you gone first, one, so the public watches you go
through it. You do an absolutely fantastic job.
Watts: Thank you.
Borton: This is some -- perhaps some just grinding guts to make these things work
with tax dollars the right way and you're phenomenal at it.
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 95 of 99
Watts: These have actually taken quite an amount of time to negotiate --
Borton: It's not easy.
Watts: -- these contracts. That doesn't -- it's been challenging, as you can
imagine, manufacturers don't like the idea of seeing something in their contract
saying that we are giving this little bit of money or in this one contract you're
guaranteed nothing until next year.
Borton: Okay. You made reference to the -- to the bond savings or --
Watts: Yes.
Borton: -- escalation clauses and all those little details to save taxpayer dollars.
So, thank you for doing what you do.
Watts: You bet. Thank you. Appreciate it.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Keith, what was the -- what was the range on the Ewing bids?
Watts: On --
Bird: On the overall bid.
Watts: So, our high bid on the headworks project was 12,61,666. John came in
at nine -- or Ewing Company, excuse me, came in at 9,729,000. Our second low
bid was 10,217,000. So, it was a significant -- 488,000 dollars low.
Bird: I was going to say, he's --
Watts: So, when I had that discussion -- actually, the first time I had a discussion
with Tuck on the equipment -- or the price escalation, he was a little concerned,
because he knew he left --
Bird: Almost 25 percent of it.
Watts: Yeah. And he had left so much out to start with. So, I understand his
concern.
B. Police: Intergovernmental Memorandum of
Understanding of use of Meridian Police Department
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 96 of 99
Canine Holding Facility between City of Meridian and
Bureau of Land Management
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. 11-B is under our Police Department. I can't wait
to ask my questions.
Brown: Good evening, Madam Mayor and Council Members. I have a request for
authorization for a memorandum of understanding between the Meridian Police
Department and our canine holding facility and the Bureau of Land Management.
They currently have two canines that are in our district and have asked to use our
facility. I will say that they have also provided us with valuable sites for training
our police canines and it has been a very beneficial relationship.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions?
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: I move that we approve the MOU between the City of Meridian and the
BLM.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 11-B. Any discussion?
Mr. Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Milam: Thank you.
Brown: Thank you.
Item 12: Ordinances
A. Ordinance No. 17-1728: An Ordinance (Bancroft Square
MDA H-2016-0055) For the Re-Zone of a Portion of the
Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 21,
Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of
Meridian, Ada County Idaho; Establishing and
Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification From R-
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 97 of 99
4 (Medium Low Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Low
Density Residential) Zoning Districts in the Meridian City
Code; Providing that Copies of this Ordinance shall be
Filed with the Ada County Assessor, The Ada County
Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as
Required by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the
Ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading
rules; and Providing an Effective Date.
De Weerd: Thank you. Eleven -- or 12-A is Ordinance 17-1728. Mr. Clerk, will
you, please, read this by title.
Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 17-1728: an
Ordinance (Bancroft Square MDA H-2016-0055) for the re-zone of a portion of the
Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 1
East, Boise meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; establishing and
determining the land use zoning classification from R-4 (Medium Low Density
Residential) to R-8 (Medium Low Density Residential) Zoning Districts in the
Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the
Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax
Commission, as required by law; and providing for a summary of the
ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing
an effective date.
De Weerd: Council, do I have a motion?
Milam: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Ms. Milam.
Milam: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 17-1728 with suspension of rules.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 12 -A. If there is no
discussion, Mr. Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
B. Ordinance No. 17-1729: An Ordinance (Oaks South - H-
2017-0010) For the Re-Zone of Parcels of Land Situated
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 98 of 99
in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North,
Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land
Use Zoning Classification From L-O (Limited Office) to
R-8(Medium Density Residential)(0.005 acres); L-O
(Limited Office) to R-15 (Medium-High Density
Residential)(0.001 acres); R-15 (Medium-High Density
Residential) to L-O (Limited Office)(0.04); R-15 (Medium
High Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Density
Residential)(0.22 acres); R-15 (Medium-High Density
Residential) to R-4 (Medium Low Density
Residential)(0.19); R-8 (Medium Density Residential) to
R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential)(0.31); and R- 4
(Medium Low Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium
Density Residential)(0.07)zoning districts, in the
Meridian City Code; Providing that Copies of this
Ordinance Shall be Filed with the Ada County Assessor,
the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax
Commission, as Required by Law; and Providing for a
Summary of the Ordinance; and providing for a waiver
of the reading rules; And Providing an Effective Date.
De Weerd: Mr. Clerk, will you, please, read Ordinance 17-1729 by title.
Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 17-1729, an
Ordinance (Oaks South - H-2017-0010) for the re-zone of parcels of land situated
in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise
meridian, City of Meridian, Ada county, Idaho; establishing and determining the
land use zoning classification from L-O (Limited Office) to R-8(Medium Density
Residential)(0.005 acres); L-O (Limited Office) to R-15 (Medium-High
Density Residential)(0.001 acres); R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential)
to L-O (Limited Office)(0.04); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) to R-8
(Medium Density Residential)(0.22 acres); R-15 (Medium-High Density
Residential) to R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential)(0.19); R-8 (Medium
Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential)(0.31); and R- 4
(Medium Low Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(0.07)
zoning districts, in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance
shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the
Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing for a summary of
the ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an
effective date.
De Weerd: Do I have a motion?
Milam: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
May 23, 2017
Page 99 of 99
De Weerd: Mrs. Milam.
Milam: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 17-1729 with suspension of rules.
Bird: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 12-B. Mr. Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little
Roberts, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 13: Future Meeting Topics
De Weerd: Item 13. We have a couple of upcoming event. Hands Only CPR
class Wednesday -- this Wednesday. I know Councilman Borton is going to be
taking our -- one of our CPR -- thank you for doing that.
Bird: When it is?
De Weerd: It on Wednesday at 1:00 p.m. at the Public Safety Training Center
Hands Only CPR. On Wednesday. Take Me Fishing trailer will be a Kleiner Park
on Thursday from 4:00 to 8:00. Love to see you take your poles out there. And
our senior advisory board is having their fire safety presentation on Saturday, May
27th from 10:00 to noon at the Public Safety Training Center and we have our
Memorial Day Celebration Monday, the 29th, at 10:30 the Rock of Honor. Any
items under this future meeting topics? If not, I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
Bird: So moved.
Milam: Second.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
MEETING A JOURNED AT 10:45 P.M.
(AUDIO RE991RDIWON ILFQF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
A1AVQD TA DATE APPROVED
ATTESTi)
C. dAY CaES, CITY CLERK
O��O�ATCD A VCL
~G 90
yCity of
A IUAH4
� V
�, SEAL
The Office of the Mayor
P R O C L A M A T I O N
Whereas, being a Rocky Mountain golfer is more than driving fairways, putting the greens,
making par and having a perfect swing. It is training to build leadership,
character, confidence, teamwork and resilience – traits needed to succeed on the
course, in the classroom and in the real world; and,
Whereas, the Rocky Mountain Golf Team posted a final score of 580 at the 2017 state
championship tournament for golf; and,
Whereas, their hard work, determination and teamwork resulted in a 48 stroke victory to
repeat as State Champions and bring home the 2017 state golf title; and,
Whereas, capturing the state title builds school spirit and allows these student athletes
bragging rights as they walk the halls of Rocky Mountain; and,
Whereas, the leadership, training and discipline of coaches Mike McCrady, Jeff Davis, and
Frank McCrady helped Sam Tidd, Carson Barry, Drew Reinke, Ranger Downs,
Jake Slocum and Jesse Lasley to focus their talents and passion to become a
winning team, with each player making valuable contributions to their victory;
Therefore, I, Mayor Tammy de Weerd, do hereby proclaim May 23rd, 2017 as
Rocky Mountain High School Golf State
Champions Day
in the City of Meridian and call upon the community to join me in congratulating the
Grizzlies on repeating as state champions and for representing Meridian so proudly in the
state tournament.
Dated this 23rd day of May 2017. _________ ______
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
Keith Bird, City Council President
Joe Borton, City Council Vice President
Anne Little Roberts, City Council
Genesis Milam, City Council
Luke Cavener, City Council
Ty Palmer, City Council
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum)
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC FORUM SIGN -IN SHEET
Date: May 23, 2017
Prior to the commencement of the meeting a person wishing to address the Mayor and City
Council MUST sign in and limit their comments to the matter described below. Complaints
about individuals, city staff, business or private matters will not be allowed. Testimony or
comment on an active application or proposal that is or will be pending before Planning and
Zoning or City Council is strictly prohibited by Idaho law. Each speaker will have up to three
(3) minutes to address the Mayor and Council, but the chair may stop the speaker if the
matter does appear to violate guidelines, varies from the topic identified on this sign in
sheet or other provisions of law or policy,
Print Name jProvide Description of Discussion Topic
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6A
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Approve Minutes of May 9, 2017 City Council Workshop Meeting
MEETING NOTES
u APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Meridian City Council Workshop
May 9, 2017
Page 63 of 63
De Weerd: Okay. I will get an e-mail out to all of you tomorrow. Okay. If there
is nothing further, I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
Bird: So moved.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:10 P.M.
(AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
MAYOR TA rp
DE WEERD
ATTEST:
C. JA COLE . WY CLERK
S` 2-3 /�
DATE APPROVED
f X16' oP c'o
rn
� Ill W
ANS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6B
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Approve Minutes of May 16, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting
MEETING NOTES
L✓i APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Meridian City Council
May 16, 2017
Page 22 of 23
then, either we get savings, hey, we decided this when we did the budget
process, instead of amending it later.
Niemeyer: Agreed. All right.
De Weerd: So, we will hear this in a couple of weeks.
Niemeyer: You will hear the MOU in a couple weeks, so long as we get that
done legally. On the issue of the software, it may be a little bit longer than that.
De Weerd: Okay.
Niemeyer: But we will bring it back.
Item 10: Future Meeting Topics
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Okay. Item 10 is Future Meeting Topics.
Council, anything for future agenda items? Just a few upcoming events.
Tomorrow we have the groundbreaking at the Idaho College Osteopathic
Medicine. So, hopefully, you can join us at 11:00 a.m. at the lot just on the east
side of Idaho State University. On May 18th from 6:00 to 7:30 is law appreciation
-- law enforcement appreciation dinner at Harvest Church. They have done this
in past years and just a way to love on our law enforcement and show them how
much they appreciate them. And that's from 6:00 to 7:30. If you would like to
attend, please, let my office know and we will pass that along. Paws in the Park
is on Saturday, May 20th from 10:00 to 1:00 at Storey Bark Park. The library is
celebrating their 20th birthday party at -- of their Cherry Lane branch on Saturday
on -- from 2:00 to 4:00 and join Council Member Palmer on Monday -- Meridian
Mondays at 6:00 o'clock in City Hall Plaza. If there is nothing further, I would
entertain a motion to close -- or to adjourn.
Bird: So moved.
Milam: Second.
De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:45 P.M.
(AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
MAYOR MY DE WEERD DATE APPROVED
Meridian City Council
May 16, 2017
Page 23 of 23
OR
O�QpTEDgVc� T
s
2V �
ATTEST:
CV`"` of w
E I%AjN�
Z FANO
m
AL
C. J CO S, CITY CLERK
��,� �w/
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6C
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Approve Minutes of May 16, 2017 City Council Special Meeting
MEETING NOTES
c✓i APPRO11:0
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Meridian City Council Special Meeting
May 16, 2017
Page 2 of 2
Bird: Move to come out of executive session.
Borton: Second.
DeWeerd: Motion and a second to come out of executive session. All in favor?
MOTION CARRIED: ONE ABSENT, FIVE AYES.
Bird: Move to adjourn.
Borton: Second.
DeWeerd: Motion and a second to adjourn. All in favor?
MOTION CARRIED: ONE ABSENT. FIVE AYES.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:58 P.M.
(AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
m
MAYOR De WEERD DATE APPROVED
ATTEST:
C.JAY C-OLE8JCITY CLERK
\2GO�QpRATEDAbG,Gs;
f o
m jD�** W
�` V �.
��2. SEAL L�/
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6D
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
/7 -
Resolution No.: A Resolution for the Donation of Surplus Computer Equipment to
Meridian Food Bank, Nampa School District, Boys & Girls Club of Ada County, Star Fire
Department and Computers for Kids
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. ! -7
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER,
MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO,
SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES TO DECLARE SURPLUS
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT OF NOMINAL VALUE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF
THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO DONATE SUCH COMPUTER EQUIPMENT,
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Meridian to declare that a certain computer
equipment as attached in Exhibit "A" as surplus as these particular items are no longer needed or used by
the City of Meridian;
WHEREAS, the City of Meridian's purchasing policy allows surplus City property to be donated
to other government agencies when the value of the property in question is of nominal value, that is,
valued at less than the cost of disposing of the property;
WHEREAS, the cost of maintaining the computer equipment listed in Exhibit "A" would result
in the unnecessary expenditure of City funds; and
WHEREAS, the City of Meridian desires to donate the computer equipment listed in Exhibit "A"
to Nampa School District, Meridian Food Bank, Boys & Girls Club of Ada County, Star Fire Department
and Computers for Kids, all agencies exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorize and declare that certain
computer equipment as attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is surplus property.
Section 2. That the Mayor and City Council hereby authorize the conveyance of the computer
equipment listed in Exhibit "A" to the Nampa School District, Meridian Food Bank, Boys & Girls Club
of Ada County, Star Fire Department and Computers for Kids, all agencies exempt fi•om federal income
tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this X day of May, 2017.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ?3 day of May, 2017.
APPROVED:
x Ip o
'd
Mayor Tam e Weerd z� S�gL'O•N,/
ATTEST:
Cly ColO City Clerk
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DONATION OF 'UTER MENT TO NAMPA SCHOOL DISTRICT, MERIDIAN FOOD
BANK, BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ADA COUNTY, EPARTMENT AND COMPUTERS FOR KIDS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6E
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
/7--/
Resolution No.: A Resolution for the Vacation of a Portion of the 10 -foot wide Public
Utility, Drainage and Irrigation (PUDI) Easement
Located between Lots 4 and 5 of Block and Lots 4 and 5 of Block 5 platted with
Troutner Park Subdivision No. 2 (Rainier Villas)
MEETING NOTES
Ff APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-046810
BOISE IDAHO Pgs=3 VICTORIA BAILEY 05/25/2017 12:02 PM
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE
CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. C -7� do! 5
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER,
MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS
A RESOLUTION VACATING THE 10 -FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY,
DRAINAGE AND IRRIGATION (PUDI) EASEMENT (GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN,
GRANTOR: INTERMOUNTAIN PACIFIC) LOCATED BETWEEN LOTS 4 AND 5 OF
BLOCK 4 AND LOTS 4 AND 5 OF BLOCK 5 PLATTED WITH TROUTNER PARK
SUBDIVISION NO. 2 IN THE NE 1/40F SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1
WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2017 the City Council of the City of Meridian, held a hearing on
the vacation of the 10 -foot wide public utility, drainage and irrigation easement platted along the
north/south lot lines of Lots 4 and 5 of Block 4 and Lots 4 and 5 of Block 5 of Troutner Park
Subdivision No. 2 (Rainier Villas), as shown in the attached Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located on the west of N. Meridian Road between W.
Corporate Drive and W. Pennwood Street in the NE '/4 of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1
West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; and
WHEREAS, after such hearing, the City Council, by formal motion, did approve said
described vacation.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO:
Section 1. That the 10 -foot wide public utility, drainage and irrigation easement platted
along the north/south lot lines of Lots 4 and 5 of Block 4 and Lots 4 and 5 of Block 5 of Troutner
Park Subdivision No. 2 (Rainier Villas), located on the west of N. Meridian Road between W.
Corporate Drive and W. Pennwood Street in the NE %4 of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1
West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho is hereby vacated. A copy of the
necessary relinquishment is attached as Exhibit "A".
Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
adoption and approval.
TROUTNER PARK SUBDIVISION No. 2 (RAINIER VILLAS) VACATION - H-2017-0045 PAGE I OF 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian Idaho, this a3 day of May, 2017.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 0 day of May, 2017.
= 8I� W
mI
m2 �q/O �o Vi
L
ATTEST:
By:
C. ay Coles ity Clerk
STATE OF IDAHO,
ss
County of Ada
Mager Tammy eerd
On this day of L , 2017, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for said State, personally ppeared TAMMY de WEERD and C.JAY
COLES, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian,
Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian
executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official
seal the day and year first above written.
goes*#•
(SEAVO, 0 - P --
.y
IC
�P� �jn-
NOTARY PUBLIC ��R IDAHO
RESIDING AT:
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
TROUTNER PARK SUBDIVISION No. 2 (RAINIER VILLAS) VACATION — H-2017-0045 PAGE 2 of 2
EXHIBIT A
PUDI Easement to be Vacated
Troutner Park Subdivision No. 2 H-21117'-0045
701
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: Mav 23,2017
ITEM NUMBER: 6F
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0051
ITEM TITLE: Hill's Century Farm Commercial No. 1
Final Order for Hill's Century Farm Commercial No. 1 (H-2017-0051) by Century Farm
Development, LLC Located 1/2 Mile East of S. Eagle Road on South of E. Amity Road
MEETING NOTES
u APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR HILL’S CENTURY FARM COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (H-2017-0051)
Page 1 of 3
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
HEARING DATE: MAY 16, 2017
IN THE MATTER OF THE
REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT
CONSISTING OF TEN (10)
BUILDING LOTS AND ONE (1)
COMMON LOT ON 10.82 ACRES
OF LAND IN THE C-N ZONING
DISTRICT FOR HILL’S CENTURY
FARM COMMERCIAL
SUBDIVISION NO. 1
BY: CENTURY FARM
DEVELOPMENT, LLC
APPLICANT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. H-2017-0051
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council on May 16, 2017 for final plat approval
pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the
Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the
Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having
considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING HILL’S CENTURY FARM
COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION NO. 1, LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE
NORTHEAST ¼ OF THE NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR HILL’S CENTURY FARM COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (H-2017-0051)
Page 2 of 3
COUNTY, IDAHO, 2017, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 4/3/2017, by AARON L.
BALLARD, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 3,” is conditionally approved subject to those
conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council
from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community
Development Department dated May 16, 2017, a true and correct copy of which is
attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and
the response letter from Mike Wardle, a true and correct copy of which is attached
hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s
requirements shall be signed only at such time as:
2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are
completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been
issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site
improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the
City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at
issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition
for Judicial Review may be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an
interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-
eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho
Code§ 67-52.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the & day of
zl—1 y , 2017.
VORATEpq By:
Goy �eG Tammy de e
IV'`�� ayor, Cit Meridian
Attest: (�lVor (0
jDW
-4
M ��qNO
2� SEAL
C.Jdy ColerReAsvR��Pw
City Clerk
Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the
Community Development Department and City Attorney.
By: C - 7 �/ C'D Dated: V( � G// �)/
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR HILL'S CENTURY FARM COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (H-2017-0051)
Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: May 16, 2017
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner
208-884-5533
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
208-887-2211
SUBJECT: Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision No. 1 – FP H-2017-0051
I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant, Century Farm Development, LLC, has applied for a final plat (FP) consisting of 10
building lots and one common area lot on 10.82 acres of land in the C-N zoning district. This is the
first phase of development of Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision No. 1 final plat
based on the analysis provided below in Section V.
III. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
I move to approve File Number H-2017-0051, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of
May 16, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.)
Denial
I move to deny File Number H-2017-0051, as presented during the hearing on May 16, 2017, for the
following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0051 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date
here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
A. Site Address/Location:
The subject property is generally located ½ mile east of S. Eagle Road on the south side of E.
Amity Road at the southwest corner of E. Amity Road and S. Hillsdale Avenue, in the NW ¼ of
Section 33, T. 3N., R. 1E.
B. Applicant:
Century Farm Development, LLC
12601 W. Explorer Drive, Ste. 200
Boise, ID 83713
C. Owner:
Martin L. Hill
3675 E. Amity Rd.
Meridian, ID 83642
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 2
D. Representative:
Michael D. Wardle, Brighton Corporation
12601 W. Explorer Drive, Ste. 200
Boise, ID 83713
V. STAFF ANALYSIS
The proposed final plat depicts 10 building lots and one common lot on 10.82 acres of land in the C-
N zoning district. All of the lots proposed in this phase are for retail, service, and professional office
uses.
Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary
plat in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The number of buildable lots and
common area is the same; therefore, staff deems the proposed final plat in substantial compliance
with the approved preliminary plat.
VI. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC,
consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6B.
2. The final plat prepared by KM Engineering, stamped on 4/3/2017 by Aaron L. Ballard shall be
revised as follows:
a. Include the recorded instrument numbers on the face of the plat for the gravity irrigation
easements, temporary turnaround easement, and City of Meridian water and sewer easements.
b. Note #11: Include recorded instrument number.
c. Note #14: Include recorded instrument number.
d. Note #15: Include recorded instrument number.
e. Include a note and/or depict a cross-access easement that grants cross-access to all lots within
the subdivision.
f. Include the following note: Maintenance of any irrigation and/or drainage pipes or ditches
crossing a lot is the responsibility of the lot owner unless such responsibility is assumed by an
irrigation/drainage entity or lot owners association.
g. Depict a 25-foot wide permanent dedicated buffer or common lot along E. Amity Road; a 20-
foot wide buffer along S. Hillsdale Road; and a 10-foot wide buffer along E. Hill Park St.
Include a note stating these buffers will be maintained by the property owner or business
owner’s association, as applicable, as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.2b.
h. Applicant shall be required to dedicate sanitary sewer and water easements to provide service
to Lots 3 and 6, Block 2. The easements will need to be created outside of the plat process
using meridian standard forms per General Condition of Approval #19 below.
3. The landscape plan prepared by KM Engineering, dated 2/3/2017, shall be revised prior to
signature on the final plat by the City Engineer as follows:
a. Depict one tree per 35 linear feet within the required street buffers along E. Amity Road, S.
Hillsdale Avenue and E. Hill Park Street in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.3. No trees are
allowed within the easement for the Cunningham Lateral; provide an additional 5 feet outside
of the easement for landscaping if necessary to accommodate the required trees.
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 3
b. Include a calculations table demonstrating compliance with the street buffer landscape
requirements listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3.
VII. ONGOING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets
the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth
in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14.
2. All common open space and site amenities shall be maintained by an owner's association as set
forth in UDC 11-3G-3F1.
3. The project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances and previous conditions of
approval associated with this site (CPAM-15-001, AZ-15-004, Development Agreement #2015-
061375; H-2016-0092).
4. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a
minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the
area.
5. The applicant shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all pathways.
6. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set
forth in UDC 11-3A-11.
7. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping
and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11-
3A-3.
8. Future buildings constructed within this development shall be generally consistent with the
conceptual elevations included in the development agreement.
9. This property shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required
for the development of the assisted living facility and medical clinic.
VIII. PROCESS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. No signs are approved with this application. Prior to installing any signs on the property, the
applicant shall submit a sign permit application consistent with the standards in UDC Chapter 3
Article D and receive approval for such signs.
2. The applicant shall complete all improvements related to public life, safety, and health as set forth
in UDC 11-5C-3B. A surety agreement may be accepted for other improvements in accord with
UDC 11-5C-3C.
3. The applicant shall obtain approval for all successive phases of the preliminary plat within two
years of the signature of the City Engineer on the previous final plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-
7B or obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7.
4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Division staff, the
applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A.
5. The applicant shall pay any applicable impact fees prior to the issuance of a building permit.
IX. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to
the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall
coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 4
of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer
mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate
materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard
Specifications.
2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development.
The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development,
coordinate main size and routing with Public Works.
3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy
of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety
for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in
UDC 11-5C-3B.
4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the
applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A.
5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat.
6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the
amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior
to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the
owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement
with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,
cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the
Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for
more information at 887-2211.
7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of
20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration
of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by
the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash
deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the
Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for
more information at 887-2211.
8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health
improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a
surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C.
9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan
approval letter.
10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B.
14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 5
15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of
3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom
elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above.
16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or
drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district
or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in
accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate
of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project.
17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per
the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved
prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project.
18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street
Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be
installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan
set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s
work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental
Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility
Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting.
19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of
way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a
single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but
rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The
easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed
easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked
EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for
review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO
NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be
submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer.
20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that
may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per
City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at
(208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic
purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources.
22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment
procedures and inspections.
23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface
or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point
connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,
the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to
development plan approval.
24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 6
11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any
other applicable law or regulation.
X. EXHIIBITS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 7/14/16)
C. Proposed Final Plat (dated: 4/3/17)
D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 2/3/17)
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 7
Exhibit A – Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 8
Exhibit B – Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 07/14/16)
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 9
Exhibit C – Proposed Final Plat (dated: 4/3/17)
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 10
EXHIBIT A
Hill’s Century Farm Commercial Subdivision – FP H-2017-0051 PAGE 11
Exhibit D –Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 2/3/17)
Sonya Allen EXHIBIT B
From: Mike Wardle < mward le@ brig htoncorp.com >
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 3:55 PM
To: Sonya Allen; C.Jay Coles; Machelle Hill; Charlene Way; Barbara Shiffer
Cc: David Turnbull; Jon Wardle; Kevin McCarthy (Kevin@kmengllp.com); Lachlin Kinsella
(LKinsella@kmengllp.com); Kameron Nauahi
Subject: RE: Hill's Century Farm Commercial Sub. 1 - FP H-2017-0051 Staff Recommendation to
Commission for May 16th Mtg
All,
We have reviewed the Hill's Century Farm Commercial Subdivision No. 1 staff report and concur with its
analysis and recommended conditions, and request the Council's consent agenda approval.
For the record, Site Specific Condition #3.a cites the Boise Project Board of Control's restriction of trees within
the Cunningham Lateral easement and its potential impact on the required street buffer. We appreciate
staff's "if necessary" statement concerning the location of the "required trees" outside of that easement; and
note that Alternative Compliance may be necessary in the future if unanticipated site development conflicts
arise with that requirement.
Respectfully,
Michael Wardle
Director of Planning
Brighton Corporation
12601 W. Explorer, Suite 200 ( Boise, Idaho 83713
Direct 208.287.0512 1 Cell 208.863.6150
From: Sonya Allen[mailto:sallen@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:10 PM
To: Mike Wardle
Cc: Kameron Nauahi; Barbara Shiffer; C.Jay Coles; Charlene Way; Machelle Hill
Subject: Hill's Century Farm Commercial Sub. 1 - FP H-2017-0051 Staff Recommendation to Commission for May 16th
Mtg
Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Hill's Century Farm Commercial Sub. 1. This item
is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on May 16th. The hearing wilt be held at City Halt, 33 E.
Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions.
Mike - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office
(mhill@meridiancity.or , cjcoles@meridiancity.org, cway@meridiancity.or , bshiffer@meridiancity.or and
myself (e-mail or fax) by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting.
If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a
written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are
passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with
the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the
consent agenda for discussion.
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
6G
Final Order for Paisley Meadows No. 2 (H-2017-0056) by Hayden Homes Idaho, LLC
Located 2180 E. Amity Road
MEETING NOTES
c✓ APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PAISLEY MEADOWS SUBDIVISION No. 2 (H-2016-0056)
Page 1 of 3
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
HEARING DATE: MAY 16, 2017
IN THE MATTER OF THE
REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT
CONSISTING OF 29 RESIDENTIAL
LOTS AND 1 COMMON LOT ON
8.02 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-4
ZONING DISTRICT FOR PAISLEY
MEADOWS SUBDIVISION NO. 2
BY: HAYDEN HOMES IDAHO, LLC
APPLICANT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. H-2017-0056
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
This matter coming before the City Council on May 16, 2017 for final plat approval
pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the
Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the
Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having
considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING PAISLEY MEADOWS SUBDIVISION
NO. 2, LOCATED IN THE SW ¼ OF SECTION 29, T.3N., R.1E, B.M.,
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2017, CLINTON W. HANSEN, PLS,
SHEET 1 OF 3,” is approved subject to those conditions in the staff report to the
Mayor and City Council from the Planning and the Development Services
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PAISLEY MEADOWS SUBDIVISION No. 2 (H-2016-0056)
Page 2 of 3
Divisions of the Community Development Department dated May 16, 2017, a
true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this
reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Ross Erickson, a true
and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this
reference incorporated herein.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s
requirements shall be signed only at such time as:
2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are
completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been
issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site
improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the
City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at
issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition
for Judicial Review may be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an
interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-
eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho
Code§ 67-52.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 6/ day of
//� I\/ 32017.
a
Attest:
(11Y of w
�E ..IDIAN�-
IDAHO
SEAL
C. Lay Col
City Clerk Ofthe TREPsv
Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning Division, Public Works Department, and City
Attorney.
By: C 4' Dated: 5Z d Zj
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
FOR PAISLEY MEADOWS SUBDIVISION No. 2 (H-2016-0056)
Page 3 of 3
1
Joshua Beach
From:Ross Erickson <ross@ericksoncivil.com>
Sent:Thursday, May 11, 2017 7:57 AM
To:Joshua Beach; Barbara Shiffer; C.Jay Coles; Charlene Way; Machelle Hill
Cc:'Mike Gregory'; 'Tim Mokwa'
Subject:RE: Paisley Meadows No. 2
Attachments:Paisley Meadows No. 2 - FP H-2017-0056.pdf
Hi Josh – Thanks for sending over the revised report. We are in agreement with, and will comply with the Conditions of
Approval as stated within the revised staff report. Please let me know if you need anything else from us in order for the
project to be included on the consent agenda next week.
Thanks, RE
Ross Erickson, PE
Erickson Civil, Inc.
6213 N. Cloverdale Rd. Suite 125
Boise, Idaho 83713
C.208.867.3954
T.208.846.8955
F.208.846.8956
ross@ericksoncivil.com
www.ericksoncivil.com
From: Joshua Beach [ mailto:jbeach@meridiancity.org ]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:56 AM
To: ross@ericksoncivil.com ; Barbara Shiffer < bshiffer@meridiancity.org >; C.Jay Coles < cjcoles@meridiancity.org >;
Charlene Way < cway@meridiancity.org >; Machelle Hill < mhill@meridiancity.org >
Subject: Paisley Meadows No. 2
Ross - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk’s office
(cjcoles@meridiancity.org , mhill@meridiancity.org ) and myself (e-mail or fax) by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior
to the meeting.
If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a
written response accordingly by Thursday at 3:00 pm, your item will be placed on the consent agenda;
consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you
are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the
item is pulled off of the consent agenda.
If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday, or if you have concerns with the conditions of
approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda.
Josh Beach | Associate City Planner
City of Meridian | Community Development Department
33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: 208-489-0576
Built for Business, Designed for Living
2
www.opportunitymeridian.org
All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law,
in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law.
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: May 16, 2017
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Josh Beach, Associate City Planner
208-884-5533
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
208-887-2211
SUBJECT: Paisley Meadows Subdivision No. 2 - FP (H-2017-0056)
I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant, Hayden Homes Idaho, LLC, has applied for final plat (FP) approval of 29 single-
family residential building lots and 1 common area lot on 8.02 acres of land in an R-4 zoning district
for Paisley Meadows Subdivision No. 2.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Paisley Meadows Subdivision No. 2 final plat based on the
analysis provided below in Section V.
III. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
I move to approve File Number H-2017-0056 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of
May 16, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.)
Denial
I move to deny File Number H-2017-0056, as presented during the hearing on May 16, 2017, for the
following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0056 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date
here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
A. Site Address/Location:
The subject property is located at 2180 E. Amity Road, in the SW ¼ of Section 29, T. 3N., R. 1E.
B. Applicant:
Hayden Homes Idaho, LLC
1406 N. Main Street, Suite 114
Meridian, Idaho 83642
C. Owner:
B&L Idaho 2, LLC
6700 E. Glacier Dr.
Boise, ID 83713
D. Representative:
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 2
Erickson Civil, Inc.
6213 N. Cloverdale Road, Suite 125
Garden City, ID 83714
V. STAFF ANALYSIS
The proposed final plat depicts 29 building lots and 1 common area lot on 8.02 acres of land in the R-
4 zoning district. All of the lots proposed in this subdivision are for single-family detached homes and
comply with the dimensional standards of the R-4 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5.
Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary
plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance
with the approved preliminary plat.
VI. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation and preliminary plat (H-2016-0089,
AZ-06-042).
2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by November 9, 2018;
or, apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-6B-7.
3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the
accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized.
4. The final plat prepared by Land Solutions, stamped and dated on 4/11/17 by Clinton W. Hansen
PLS, shall be revised prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat as follows:
a. Complete the recording instrument number reference for the sidewalk easement in the plat
legend.
b. Revise note #2 to create 5-foot wide side lot line PUDI easements.
5. The landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts, dated 9/21/16, shall be revised as follows:
a. All fencing installed on the site must comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6
and 11-3A-7. If permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary
construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release
of building permits for this subdivision.
b. The proposed 4-foot solid fencing with 2-foot “lattice” openings at the top require that
the “lattice “ be at least 80% open vision in order to meet the requirements of UDC 11-
3A-7. This condition is applicable to fencing adjacent to Lot 11, Block 5.
6. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does
not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
7. Comply with the stormwater integration standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11C.
8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record a final plat.
9. All existing structures on the site shall be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City
Engineer.
10. Future homes constructed within this development shall comply with the conceptual building
elevations and materials approved with the preliminary plat.
11. A landscape surety shall be put into place for removal of the construction entrance and t he
temporary construction entrance shall be removed prior to signature on the final plat for
phase two of the proposed development.
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 3
VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to
the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall
coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms
of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer
mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate
materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard
Specifications.
2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development.
The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development,
coordinate main size and routing with Public Works.
3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy
of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety
for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set f orth in
UDC 11-5C-3B.
4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the
applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A.
5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat.
6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the
amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior
to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the
owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Sur ety Agreement
with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,
cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the
Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for
more information at 887-2211.
7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of
20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration
of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by
the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash
deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the
Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for
more information at 887-2211.
8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health
improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a
surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C.
9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan
approval letter.
10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 4
13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B.
14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of
3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom
elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above.
16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or
drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district
or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the faciliti es have been installed in
accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate
of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project.
17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per
the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved
prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project.
18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street
Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be
installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan
set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s
work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental
Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility
Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting.
19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of
way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a
single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but
rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The
easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed
easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked
EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for
review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO
NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be
submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer.
20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that
may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per
City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at
(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic
purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources
Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190.
22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and
inspections (208)375-5211.
23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year -round
source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface
or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point
connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized,
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 5
the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to
development plan approval.
24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC
11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any
other applicable law or regulation.
VIII. EXHIIBITS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 7/11/16)
C. Proposed Final Plat (dated: 4/11/17)
D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 3/29/17)
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 6
Exhibit A – Vicinity Map
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 7
Exhibit B – Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 7/11/16)
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 8
Exhibit C – Proposed Final Plat (dated: 4/11/17)
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 9
Exhibit D –Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 3/29/17)
Exhibit A
Paisley Meadows Sub No. 2 – FP H-2017-0056 PAGE 10
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: Mav 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6H
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Bellfower Park (H-2017-0053) by
Bridgetower Crossing, LLC & T3 Holdings, LLC Located 3140 & 3150 W. Belltower Drive
MEETING NOTES
91 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0053 - 1 -
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION & ORDER
In the Matter of the Request for Short Plat Consisting of Four (4) Commercial Building Lots on
1.64 Acres of Land in the L-O (Limited Office) Zoning District for Belltower Park Subdivision, by
Bridgetower Crossing, LLC and T3 Holdings, LLC.
Case No(s). H-2017-0053
For the City Council Hearing Date of: May 16, 2017 (Findings on May 23, 2017)
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 16, 2017, incorporated by
reference)
2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 16, 2017, incorporated by
reference)
3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 16, 2017,
incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing
date of May 16, 2017, incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at
Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by
ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A.
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose
expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be
signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the
Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party
requesting notice.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0053 - 2 -
7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of May 16, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be
reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the
application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon
the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that:
1. The applicant’s request for a short plan is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the
Staff Report for the hearing date of May 16, 2017, attached as Exhibit A.
D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits
Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration
Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or
short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature
on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined
preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A).
In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an
orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat,
such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for
final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B).
Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord
with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City
Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up
to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all
extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined
preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City
Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time
extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11-
6B-7C).
E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development
application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in
writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the
final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will
toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian.
When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person
who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the
governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order
seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code.
F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 16, 2017
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the a3 day of
2017.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD VOTED
COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED rn
COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER
VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER
VOTED
Y
COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM
VOTED
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED '—
(TIE BREAKER)
Attest:
C&y Coli
City Clerk
Mayor Tanoy dyWeerd
OORATt _
m
ISI W
sFgL��•'V
Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City
Attorney.
By: / 4fok Dated:
City Cleric's Office
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
FILE NO(S). H-2017-0053 - 3 -
EXHIBIT A
Belltower Park Subdivision – H-2017-0053 PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT
HEARING DATE: May 16, 2017
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Josh Beach, Associate Planner
208-884-5533
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
208-887-2211
SUBJECT: Belltower Park Subdivision - SHP H-2017-0053
I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicants, Bridgetower Crossing, LLC and T3 Holdings, LLC, have applied for short plat (SHP)
approval of four (4) commercial lots on approximately 1.64 acres of land in the L-O zoning district.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the criteria noted in UDC 11-6B-5, Staff finds the proposed plat is eligible to be processed
as a short plat. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions
and Findings stated in this report.
The Meridian City Council heard this item on May 16, 2017. At the public hearing, the Council
approved the subject SHP request.
a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Thomas Felter (Applicant)
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written testimony: None
v. Staff presenting application: Josh Beach
vi. Other staff commenting on application: None
b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony:
i. None
c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council:
i. None
d. Key Council Changes to Staff/Commission Recommendation
i. None
III. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
I move to approve File Number H-2017-0053 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of
May 16, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.)
Denial
I move to deny File Number H-2017-0053, as presented during the hearing on May 16, 2017, for the
following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0053 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date
here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for co ntinuance.)
EXHIBIT A
Belltower Park Subdivision – H-2017-0053 PAGE 2
IV. PROCESS FACTS
a. The subject application will in fact constitute a short plat as determined by City Ordinance. By
reason of the provisions of UDC 11-5B-3, a public hearing is required before the City Council on
this matter.
b. Newspaper notifications published on: April 28, 2017
c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: April 21, 2017
V. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
A. Site Address/Location:
The site is located at 3140 & 3150 W. Belltower Drive, in the NW ¼ of Section 35, Township
4N., Range 1W.
B. Agent:
Quadrant Consulting
1904 W. Overland Road
Boise, ID 83705
C. Applicant/Owner(s):
Bridgetower Crossing, LLC
2018 S. Pond Street
Boise, ID 83705
T3 Holdings, LLC
219 S. Ruby St., Ste. 102
Boise, ID 83705
D. History:
In 2001, the property was annexed and granted preliminary plat approval as part of the
Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision (AZ-01-003, PP-01-005).
In 2002, the subject property was granted final plat approval. The section of W. Bridgetower
Drive that provides access to this property was created with Bridgetower Crossing No. 2 (FP-02-
008).
In 2004, the subject property received preliminary/final plat (PFP-04-002) approval for
Bridgetower Gallery Subdivision.
In 2006, Lot 1, Block 1 of the proposed subdivision received certificate of zoning compliance
approval to construct a 2,272 square foot office building.
VI. STAFF ANALYSIS
The proposed short plat depicts four (4) commercial lots on approximately 1.64 acres of land in an L-
O zoning district. The proposed plat is a re-subdivision of Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 of Gallery
Subdivision.
The existing landscaping along the west (35 feet) boundary of the site was installed with the
construction of the Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision No. 2, and meet current landscape standards.
This area must remain protected during the construction on this site.
Access to the proposed lots and the surrounding public streets are provided via reciprocal cross access
agreements platted with Bridgtower Crossing No. 2 and the Gallery Subdivisions.
EXHIBIT A
Belltower Park Subdivision – H-2017-0053 PAGE 3
Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in
UDC 11-6B-5 and deems the final plat to be in substantial compliance with said requirements to
recommend approval as proposed.
VII. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved preliminary plat and final plat (PFP-07-003, FP-
02-008), and instrument numbers (101117652, 108059795, 101124464, 103062005, 108059800)
for this subdivision.
2. Direct access to N. Ten Mile Road is prohibited.
3. The final plat prepared by Quadrant Consulting, Inc., stamped on April 5, 2017 by Peter W.
Lounsbury, is approved as shown.
4. If the City Engineer’s signature has not been obtained within two (2) years of the City Council’s
approval of the short plat, the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is
obtained, per UDC 11-6B-7.
5. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the
accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized.
6. Prior to applying for a building permit for any lot within the proposed subdivision, the applicant
shall obtain the Planning Division’s approval of a certificate of zoning compliance and design
review application. Future development shall be consistent with the design standards listed in
UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines contained in the City of Meridian Architectural Standards.
7. Applicant shall be responsible for the extension of sanitary sewer and/or water services to the
newly created lots, as well as abandoning any services that are not being utilized.
VIII. ONGOING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets
the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth
in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. The existing landscape buffer along the
west boundary of the site that was installed with the construction of the Bridgetower
Crossing Subdivision must remain protected during the construction on this site.
2. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a
minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the
area.
3. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set
forth in UDC 11-3A-11.
4. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping
and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11-
3A-3.
5. Comply with all bulk, use, and development standards of the applicable district (L-O) listed in
UDC Chapter 2 District regulations.
IX. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat.
EXHIBIT A
Belltower Park Subdivision – H-2017-0053 PAGE 4
2. All development improvements, including but not limited to fencing, pressurized irrigation and
landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy, or as
otherwise allowed by UDC 11-5C-1.
3. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan
approval letter.
4. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
5. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
6. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office.
7. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H.
8. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
9. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or
drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district
or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in
accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate
of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project.
10. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that
may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
11. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per
City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at
(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic
purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources
Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190.
12. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance
Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and
inspections (208)375-5211.
X. EXHIBITS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Proposed Short Plat (dated: 04/05/2017)
C. Required Findings from the Unified Development Code
EXHIBIT A
Belltower Park Subdivision – H-2017-0053 PAGE 5
Exhibit A – Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT A
Belltower Park Subdivision – H-2017-0053 PAGE 6
Exhibit B – Proposed Short Plat (dated: 04/05/2017)
EXHIBIT A
Belltower Park Subdivision – H-2017-0053 PAGE 7
Exhibit C – Required Findings from the Unified Development Code
In consideration of a short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings:
A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified
Development Code;
The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Office. The current zoning
district of the site is L-O. The proposed short plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan and the
dimensional standards in the UDC for the L-O district.
B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the
proposed development;
The City Council finds that public services are adequate to serve the site.
C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s
capital improvements program;
The City Council finds that the development will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds. All required utilities are being provided with the development of the property at the
developer’s expense.
D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development;
The City Council finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing
supporting services. The developer and/or future lot owner(s) will finance the extension of sewer,
water, utilities and pressurized irrigation to serve the project. The primary public costs to serve the
future tenants will be fire and police services.
E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and
The City Council recognizes the fact that traffic and noise may increase with the approval of this
subdivision; however, the City Council does not believe that any additional amount generated will be
detrimental to the general welfare of the public in the surrounding area. The City Council finds that
the development of this site will not involve uses that will create nuisances that would be detrimental
to the public health, safety or general welfare.
F. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features.
The City Council is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with the
development of this site.
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017
ITEM TITLE:
City Financial Report for April 2017
ITEM NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROIED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
REPORT NAME PAGE #
Fund Balance - General 2
Fund Balance - Enterprise 3
Investment and Cash Position Graphs 4
Water - Budget to Actual Comparison 5
Wastewater - Budget to Actual Comparison 6
Public Works/Billing Budget to Actual Comparison 7
Enterprise Fund - Budget to Actual Comparison 8
Enterprise Fund - Graphs 9
Utility Sales Revenue Comparison 10
General Fund Expenditures - Budget to Actual Comparison 11
General Fund - Graphs 12
General Fund Revenue - Budget to Actual Comparison 13
Community Development - Forecast 14
Community Development - Budget to Actual Comparison 15
Community Development - Graphs 16
Overtime Graphs 17
Volunteer Hours 18
Vacant Positions 19
Internal Transfers 20
Impact Fund - Summary 21
Detailed Revenue & Expenditure Reports 22-67
Table of Contents
FINANCE REPORT
April 2017
CITY of MERIDIAN
Month 7 of FY2017 (Oct 1 - Sep 30)
1 of 1
CITY of MERIDIAN
FY2017 Enterprise Fund Balance Projection (based on approved Budget)
as of 5/9/2017
Unrestricted Restricted Restricted
Fund 60 Fund 61 Fund 62
Enterprise Grants Latecomers Total
Unrestricted Fund Balance @ 9/30/16 46,670,751$ -$ -$ 46,670,751$
Current Year Revenue & Expenditures
Fiscal Year 2017 Budgeted Revenue 32,490,274$ -$ -$ 32,490,274$
Fiscal Year 2017 Budgeted Ops Expenses 16,294,013$ -$ -$ 16,294,013$
Fiscal Year 2017 Budgeted Cap Expenses 30,859,000$ -$ -$ 30,859,000$
Fiscal Year 2017 Budgeted Transfers 2,467,003$ -$ -$ 2,467,003$
Beg FY17 Current Yr NET Revenues(Expenditures)(17,129,742)$ -$ -$ (17,129,742)$
Net Projected Fund Balance@ 9/30/17 29,541,009$ -$ -$ 29,541,009$
FY2017 Amendments
Idaho Power WRRF Electrical System 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$
Well 32 Pumping Facility Design 72,000$ 72,000$
WRRF Collections Building sewer and vent line repair 65,000$ 65,000$
Total Amendments 2,637,000$ -$ -$ 2,637,000$
Current Yr NET change to fund balance Rev(Exp)(19,766,742)$ -$ -$ (19,766,742)$
Net Fund Balance after Amendments @ 9/30/17 26,904,009$ -$ -$ 26,904,009$
FY2017 Carryforwards
Carryforward Operating 1,081,914$ 1,081,914$
Carryforward Capital 16,030,723$ 16,030,723$
Carryfoward Adjustment (8,232,985)$ (8,232,985)$
Total Carryforwards 8,879,652$ -$ -$ 8,879,652$
Net Fund Balance after Amendments & Carryforwards @ 9/30/17 18,024,357$ -$ -$ 18,024,357$
Operating Reserves - 6 months 9,000,000$ 9,000,000$
Depreciation Reserve -$ -$
Emergency Reserve 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$
Total Reserves 10,000,000$ -$ -$ 10,000,000$
Net Fund Balance after Reserves @ 9/30/17 8,024,357$ -$ -$ 8,024,357$
1 of 1 Enterprise Fund Bal
City of Meridian
Investments and Cash Position
FY2017 for Month Ending 04/30/2017
$25,508,542
$1,090,484
$0
$539,149
$2,033,766
$3,879,720
$20,323,238
$47,429,255
City of Meridian Investment Portfolio
Govern Bonds
Muncipal Bonds
Certif of Deposit
Investor Cash
BOTC MM
Cash
Idaho Bond Fund
Idaho State Pool
-0.50%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
Govern
Bonds
Muncipal
Bonds
Certif of
Deposit
Investor
Cash
BOTC
MM
Cash Idaho
Bond
Fund
Idaho
State
Pool
Yield by Investment Type
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
$400,000
General Enterprise
City of Meridian Interest Income by Fund
(GF includes restricted and designated funds)
Total Budget Budget YTD Actual YTD Prior YTD
$38,000,000
$40,000,000
$42,000,000
$44,000,000
$46,000,000
$48,000,000
$50,000,000
$52,000,000
$54,000,000
General Enterprise Fund
City of Meridian Investment/Cash Balance by Major Fund
(GF includes restricted and designated funds)
FY2017 FY2016
1 of 1 Investments
NOTE: 1/2 Billing/Public Works = Administrative costs allocated 50% / 50% to Water and Wastewater departments.
City of Meridian
Water Department - Enterprise Fund
Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons
FY2017 for Month Ending 4/30/2017
Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $YTD Variance %PYTD Actual PYTD Variance %
WATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Revenue
Water Sales 8,255,445$ 4,815,676$ 4,140,385$ (675,291)$ -14%4,081,575$ 1%
Miscellaneous 270,000$ 157,500$ 198,326$ 40,826$ 26%183,813$ 8%
1/2 Billing/Public Works 464,636$ 271,037$ 371,254$ 100,216$ 37%344,357$ 8%
Total Revenue 8,990,081$ 5,244,214$ 4,709,965$ (534,249)$ -10%4,609,745$ 2%
Personnel Costs
Administration 244,430$ 142,584$ 129,448$ 13,136$ 9%116,417$ 11%
Operations 547,797$ 319,548$ 293,167$ 26,381$ 8%269,005$ 9%
Distribution 623,081$ 363,464$ 328,546$ 34,918$ 10%322,492$ 2%
Production 288,171$ 168,100$ 148,659$ 19,441$ 12%120,741$ 23%
Backflow Prevention 124,082$ 72,380$ 60,399$ 11,981$ 17%37,120$ 63%
1/2 Billing/Public Works 2,031,471$ 1,185,024$ 980,895$ 204,130$ 17%921,317$ 6%
Total Personnel Costs 3,859,032$ 2,251,100$ 1,941,114$ 309,987$ 14%1,787,091$ 9%
Operating Costs
Administration 414,687$ 241,901$ 259,489$ (17,588)$ -7%283,117$ -8%
Operations 548,099$ 319,724$ 69,701$ 250,024$ 78%303,212$ -77%
Distribution 280,495$ 163,622$ 103,265$ 60,357$ 37%112,038$ -8%
Production 914,463$ 533,437$ 365,182$ 168,255$ 32%462,813$ -21%
Backflow Prevention 74,700$ 43,575$ 32,849$ 10,727$ 25%21,535$ 53%
General Fund Transfer 1,086,710$ 633,914$ 587,709$ 46,205$ 7%576,754$ 2%
1/2 Billing/Public Works 1,347,399$ 785,982$ 402,938$ 383,044$ 49%366,611$ 10%
Total Operating Costs 4,666,553$ 2,722,156$ 1,821,132$ 901,024$ 33%2,126,081$ -14%
Operating Income (Loss)464,496$ 270,958$ 947,719$ 676,761$ 250%696,574$ 36%
Capital Outlay Operations
Administration 402,185$ 234,608$ 243,904$ (9,296)$ -4%233,327$ 5%
Distribution 120,000$ 70,000$ 119,278$ (49,278)$ -70%-$
1/2 Billing/Public Works 71,130$ 41,492$ 46,220$ (4,728)$ -11%91,859$ -50%
Total Capital Outlay 593,315$ 346,101$ 409,403$ (63,302)$ -18%325,186$ 26%
Net Income (Loss) from Operations (128,819)$ (75,143)$ 538,317$ 613,459$ -816%371,387$ 45%
WATER CONSTRUCTION
Revenue
Residential Assessments 2,080,000$ 1,213,333$ 1,927,179$ 713,846$ 59%1,281,992$ 50%
Commercial Assessments 300,000$ 175,000$ 252,600$ 77,600$ 44%201,071$ 26%
Interest 150,000$ 87,500$ 113,410$ 25,910$ 30%91,835$ 23%
Total Revenue 2,530,000$ 1,475,833$ 2,293,189$ 817,356$ 55%1,574,898$ 46%
Operating Costs 18,000$ 10,500$ 5,830$ 4,670$ 44%20,656$ -72%
Capital Construction Projects 7,446,829$ 4,343,984$ 1,635,749$ 2,708,235$ 62%536,535$ 205%
Net Income (Loss) from Construction (4,934,829)$ (2,878,650)$ 651,610$ 3,530,261$ -123%1,017,707$ -36%
Water Department Net Income (Loss)(5,063,648)$ (2,953,793)$ 1,189,927$ 4,143,720$ -140%1,389,095$ 26%
Budget to Actual Actual
1 of 1 Water
NOTE: 1/2 Billing/Public Works = Administrative costs allocated 50% / 50% to Water and Wastewater departments.
City of Meridian
Waste Water - Enterprise Fund
Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons
FY2017 for Month Ending 4/30/2017
Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $YTD Variance %PYTD Actual PYTD Variance %
WASTE WATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Revenue
Utility Sales 14,900,000$ 8,691,667$ 8,525,826$ (165,841)$ -2%8,225,771$ 4%
Miscellaneous -$ -$ 159,346$ 159,346$ 25,785$ 518%
1/2 Billing/Public Works 464,636$ 271,037$ 371,254$ 100,216$ 37%344,357$ 8%
Total Revenue 15,364,636$ 8,962,704$ 9,056,425$ 93,721$ 1%8,595,914$ 5%
Personnel Costs
Administration 275,177$ 160,520$ 149,655$ 10,865$ 7%127,484$ 17%
Treatment Plant 1,360,718$ 793,752$ 769,191$ 24,561$ 3%759,554$ 1%
Collection Lines 541,023$ 315,597$ 223,395$ 92,201$ 29%272,686$ -18%
Pretreatment Division 159,590$ 93,094$ 92,127$ 967$ 1%84,291$ 9%
Lab 420,932$ 245,544$ 236,359$ 9,184$ 4%221,398$ 7%
1/2 Billing/Public Works 2,031,471$ 1,185,024$ 980,895$ 204,130$ 17%921,317$ 6%
Total Personnel Costs 4,788,912$ 2,793,531$ 2,451,623$ 341,908$ 12%2,386,731$ 3%
Operating Costs
Administration 482,882$ 274,390$ 273,872$ 517$ 0%224,335$ 22%
Treatment Plant 1,964,156$ 1,153,049$ 1,099,493$ 53,556$ 5%904,081$ 22%
Collection Lines 505,525$ 294,890$ 260,255$ 34,635$ 12%291,189$ -11%
Pretreatment Division 22,540$ 13,148$ 4,987$ 8,161$ 62%5,748$ -13%
Lab 222,930$ 130,042$ 76,226$ 53,816$ 41%73,346$ 4%
General Fund Transfer 1,086,710$ 633,914$ 596,601$ 37,313$ 6%585,154$ 2%
1/2 Billing/Public Works 1,347,399$ 785,982$ 402,938$ 383,044$ 49%366,611$ 10%
Total Operating Costs 5,632,142$ 3,285,416$ 2,714,373$ 571,043$ 17%2,450,465$ 11%
Operating Income (Loss)4,943,583$ 2,883,757$ 3,890,429$ 1,006,672$ 35%3,758,718$ 4%
Capital Outlay Operations
Administration 177,306$ 103,429$ 65,527$ 37,901$ 37%93,596$ -30%
Treatment Plant -$ -$ -$ -$ 141,353$ -100%
Collection Lines 462,275$ 269,660$ 465,492$ (195,832)$ -73%-$
Lab -$ -$ 6,116$ (6,116)$ -$
1/2 Billing/Public Works 71,130$ 41,492$ 46,220$ (4,728)$ -11%91,859$ -50%
Total Capital Outlay 710,711$ 414,582$ 583,356$ (168,774)$ -41%326,808$ 79%
Net Income (Loss) from Operations 4,232,871$ 2,469,175$ 3,307,074$ 837,898$ 34%3,431,910$ -4%
WASTE WATER CONSTRUCTION
Revenue
Residential Assessments 3,498,343$ 2,040,700$ 3,652,610$ 1,611,909$ 79%2,561,882$ 43%
Commercial Assessments 450,000$ 262,500$ 504,581$ 242,081$ 92%424,049$ 19%
EPA Compliance Revenue 1,432,215$ 835,459$ 841,405$ 5,946$ 1%802,347$ 5%
Interest 225,000$ 131,250$ 222,629$ 91,379$ 70%181,279$ 23%
Miscellaneous -$ -$ 20,431$ 20,431$ 99,487$ -79%
Total Revenue 5,605,558$ 3,269,909$ 5,241,655$ 1,971,746$ 60%4,069,044$ 29%
Operating Costs 35,000$ 20,417$ 11,660$ 8,757$ 43%(173,566)$ -107%
Capital Construction Projects 33,092,592$ 19,304,011$ 5,642,507$ 13,661,504$ 71%3,237,984$ 74%
Net Income (Loss) from Construction (27,522,034)$ (16,054,519)$ (412,511)$ (15,642,008)$ 97%1,004,626$ -141%
Waste Water Department Net Income (Loss)(23,289,163)$ (13,585,344)$ 2,894,562$ 16,479,906$ -121%4,436,536$ 0%
Budget to Actual Actual
1 of 1 Wastewater
NOTE: Administrative Costs are allocated to Water and Wastewater departments 50%/50%
City of Meridian
Enterprise Overhead - Public Works/Utility Billing/Environmental Divisions
Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons
FY2017 for Month Ending 04/30/2017
Actual
Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $YTD Variance %PYTD Actual
Revenue
PW Review Fees 250,000$ 145,833$ 380,431$ 234,598$ 161%330,752$
Utility Billing Fees 679,271$ 396,241$ 362,076$ (34,166)$ -9%357,962$
Total Revenue 929,271$ 542,075$ 742,507$ 200,432$ 37%688,714$
Personnel Costs 4,062,943$ 2,370,049$ 1,961,790$ 408,259$ 17%1,842,633$
Operating Expense 2,694,797$ 1,571,965$ 805,877$ 766,088$ 49%733,223$
Transfers 293,583$ 171,257$ 105,275$ 65,982$ 39%110,814$
Total OE 2,988,380$ 1,743,222$ 911,152$ 832,070$ 48%844,037$
Total PC & OE 7,051,323$ 4,113,270$ 2,872,941$ 1,240,329$ 30%2,686,671$
Operating Income (Loss) (6,122,052)$ (3,571,195)$ (2,130,434)$ 1,440,761$ -40%(1,997,957)$
Capital Outlay 142,260$ 169,547$ 92,440$ 77,107$ 45%183,718$
Net Income (Loss) (6,264,311)$ (3,740,743)$ (2,222,874)$ 1,517,869$ -41%(2,181,675)$
Budget to Actual
1 of 1 PWbilling
City of Meridian
Total Enterprise Fund
Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons
FY2017 for Month Ending 04/30/2017
Unrestricted Net Position at 9/30/2016 46,670,751$ Budget to Actual Actual
Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $
TOTAL UTILITY OPERATIONS
Operating Revenue
Water Sales 8,255,445$ 4,815,676$ 4,140,385$ (675,291)$ 4,081,575$ 58,810$
Wastewater Sales 14,900,000$ 8,691,667$ 8,525,826$ (165,841)$ 8,225,771$ 300,055$
Public Works/Utility Billing 929,271$ 542,075$ 742,507$ 200,432$ 688,714$ 53,793$
Miscellaneous 270,000$ 157,500$ 357,672$ 200,172$ 209,598$ 148,073$
Total Revenue 24,354,716$ 14,206,918$ 13,766,390$ (440,528)$ 13,205,659$ 560,731$
Personnel Costs
Water Division 1,827,561$ 1,066,076$ 960,219$ 105,857$ 865,774$ 94,444$
Wastewater Division 2,757,440$ 1,608,507$ 1,470,728$ 137,779$ 1,465,414$ 5,314$
Public Works/Utility Billing 4,062,943$ 2,370,049$ 1,961,790$ 408,259$ 1,842,633$ 119,156$
Total Personnel Costs 8,647,944$ 5,044,631$ 4,392,736$ 651,895$ 4,173,822$ 218,915$
Operating Costs
Water Division 2,232,444$ 1,302,259$ 830,484$ 471,775$ 1,182,716$ (352,231)$
Wastewater Division 3,198,033$ 1,865,519$ 1,714,834$ 150,686$ 1,498,700$ 216,133$
Public Works/Utility Billing 2,694,797$ 1,571,965$ 805,877$ 766,088$ 733,223$ 72,654$
Total Operating Costs 8,125,274$ 4,739,743$ 3,351,194$ 1,388,549$ 3,414,639$ (63,444)$
Total PC & OE 16,773,218$ 9,784,374$ 7,743,931$ 2,040,444$ 7,588,460$ 155,471$
Capital Operations 1,304,027$ 760,682$ 992,758$ (232,076)$ 651,994$ 340,765$
Operations Income (Loss)6,277,472$ 3,661,861$ 5,029,701$ 1,367,839$ 4,965,205$ 64,496$
CONSTRUCTION
Construction Revenue
Residential Assessments 5,378,343$ 3,137,367$ 4,042,724$ 905,357$ 3,668,516$ 374,208$
Commercial Assessments 750,000$ 437,500$ 757,181$ 319,681$ 625,120$ 132,061$
Multi-Family Assessments 200,000$ 116,667$ 1,537,065$ 1,420,398$ 175,358$ 1,361,706$
EPA Compliance Revenue 1,432,215$ 835,459$ 841,405$ 5,946$ 802,347$ 39,058$
Miscellaneous -$ -$ 20,431$ 20,431$ 99,487$ (79,056)$
Interest 375,000$ 218,750$ 336,039$ 117,289$ 273,114$ 62,925$
Total Construction Revenue 8,135,558$ 4,745,742$ 7,534,845$ 2,789,102$ 5,643,942$ 1,890,902$
Operating Costs Construction 53,000$ 30,917$ 17,490$ 13,427$ (152,910)$ 170,400$
Capital Construction Projects 40,539,421$ 23,647,995$ 7,278,256$ 16,369,739$ 3,774,518$ 3,503,737$
Construction Income (Loss)(32,456,863)$ (18,933,169)$ 239,099$ 19,172,268$ 2,022,334$ (1,783,235)$
General Fund Transfer 2,467,003$ 1,439,085$ 1,289,585$ 1,272,722$
Enterprise Fund Net Income (Loss) (28,646,394)$ (16,710,393)$ 3,979,215$
Fund Balance 18,024,357$ 29,960,358$ 50,649,966$
1 of 1 Enterprise
City of Meridian
Enterprise Fund Graphs
FY2016 for Month Ending 04/30/2017
Notes:
* The revenues and costs for
Public Works Administration and
for General Fund Support
services are split evenly
between Water and Wastewater
* Depreciation expense is not
included in these graphs.
$-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
Total Budget
YTD
Actual YTD PYTD Actual
Water Operations Budget to Actual
Revenue Expense
$-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
$10,000,000
Total Budget YTD Actual YTD PYTD Actual
Wastewater Operations Budget to
Actual
Revenue Expense
$-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
Total Budget YTD Actual YTD PYTD Actual
Total Enterprise Fund YTD Operating
Income and Expense
Revenue Expense
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
Water Construction WWTP Construction
Capital Construction Total Budget to
Actual
Total Budget Actual YTD
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
$4,500,000
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017
YTD Actual Utility Connection / Assessment
Revenue
Water Connection Revenue Sewer Connection Revenue
1 of 1 EnterGraphs
City of Meridian
Utility Sales Revenue Comparison
FY2017 for Period Ending 04/30/2017
what does this tell us? You can see when the high
water bills occur due to hot weather
$-
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
16.55 19.75 22.12 22.12 22.12 22.12 22.12 22.59 22.59 22.59
19.94
28.28
35.63 35.63 35.63 35.63 35.63 36.35 36.35 36.35
$3.75 $3.75 $3.75
$13.45
$13.45
$16.32 $16.62 $16.62 $16.84 $17.00 $17.25 $17.67 $17.85
Meridian Monthly Utility Bill
Trash
Sewer EPA
Sewer
Water
water @ 9000gal
sewer @ 5000gal
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
$-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
An
n
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Water / Sewer Revenues
# of Accounts
Water Revenue
Sewer Revenue
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
FY
1
9
8
0
FY
1
9
9
0
FY
2
0
0
0
FY
2
0
0
1
FY
2
0
0
2
FY
2
0
0
3
FY
2
0
0
4
FY
2
0
0
5
FY
2
0
0
6
FY
2
0
0
7
FY
2
0
0
8
FY
2
0
0
9
FY
2
0
1
0
FY
2
0
1
1
FY
2
0
1
2
FY
2
0
1
3
FY
2
0
1
4
FY
2
0
1
5
FY
2
0
1
6
FY
2
0
1
7
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
History of Meridian Utility Accounts
Sewer rate
increased in FY09
by 35% and FY10 by
26%
1 of 1 Utility
City of Meridian
General Fund
Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons
FY2017 for Month Ending 04/30/2017
Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $YTD Variance %PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $
POLICE
PC 13,723,785$ 8,005,542$ 7,264,923$ 740,619$ 9%6,905,256$ 359,667$
OE 2,638,376$ 1,539,053$ 1,398,468$ 140,585$ 9%1,264,875$ 133,593$
Total PC and OE 16,362,161$ 9,544,595$ 8,663,391$ 881,204$ 9%8,170,132$ 493,260$
CO 1,015,252$ 592,231$ 760,136$ (167,905)$ -28%323,314$ 436,822$
FIRE
PC 8,866,442$ 5,172,091$ 5,017,571$ 154,520$ 3%4,624,032$ 393,539$
OE 1,297,669$ 756,974$ 672,385$ 84,589$ 11%594,380$ 78,005$
Total PC and OE 10,164,111$ 5,929,065$ 5,689,956$ 239,109$ 4%5,218,413$ 471,543$
CO 305,520$ 178,220$ 125,322$ 52,898$ 30%575,644$ (450,322)$
Interfund Transfers 74,823$ 43,647$ 40,811$ 2,836$ 6%43,930$ (3,119)$
PARKS
PC 2,715,645$ 1,584,126$ 1,245,007$ 339,119$ 21%1,068,073$ 176,934$
OE 1,856,457$ 1,082,933$ 889,029$ 193,904$ 18%784,437$ 104,592$
Total PC & OE 4,572,101$ 2,667,059$ 2,134,036$ 533,023$ 20%1,852,510$ 281,527$
CO 7,627,087$ 4,449,134$ 1,010,836$ 3,438,298$ 77%505,168$ 505,668$
Interfund Transfers 48,461$ 28,269$ 26,433$ 1,836$ 6%28,453$ (2,020)$
ADMINISTRATION
PC 4,978,911$ 2,904,365$ 2,678,851$ 225,514$ 8%2,582,034$ 96,818$
OE 3,340,285$ 1,948,500$ 1,385,279$ 563,221$ 29%1,236,402$ 148,877$
Total PC & OE 8,319,196$ 4,852,866$ 4,064,130$ 788,736$ 16%3,818,436$ 245,694$
CO 617,469$ 360,190$ 145,279$ 214,911$ 60%111,037$ 34,242$
Interfund Transfers (2,636,078)$ (1,537,712)$ (1,380,768)$ (156,945)$ 10%(1,369,959)$ (10,809)$
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
PC 30,284,782$ 17,666,125$ 16,206,353$ 1,459,772$ 8%15,179,395$ 1,026,958$
OE 9,132,788$ 5,327,460$ 4,345,161$ 982,299$ 18%3,880,095$ 465,066$
Total PC and OE 39,417,570$ 22,993,585$ 20,551,514$ 2,442,071$ 11%19,059,490$ 1,492,024$
CO 9,565,328$ 5,579,775$ 2,041,573$ 3,538,202$ 63%1,515,163$ 526,410$
Interfund Transfers (2,512,794)$ (1,465,797)$ (1,313,523)$ (152,273)$ 10%(1,297,576)$ (15,947)$
PC = Personnel Costs OE = Operating Expenses CO = Capital Outlay
NOTE:
~ (01 thru 55 funds) General Fund, Impact Fund, Grant Fund, and Capital Projects Fund
~ Parks trending to underspend Personnel Cost due to seasonal hire in summer months
~ Fire and Parks Interfund Transfers are from Other Government to pay for City Hall costs
~ Admin Interfund Transfers are to Water and Wastewater Departments
Budget to Actual Actual
1 of 1 GeneralFund
City of Meridian
General Fund Graphs Before Interfund Transfers
FY2017 for Month Ending 04/30/2017
$-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
Police Fire Parks Admin
General Fund Personnel Cost
Current YTD compared to Prior YTD
Budget
YTD
Actual
YTD
PYTD
Actual
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
Police Fire Parks Admin
General Fund Operating Expense
Current YTD compared to Prior YTD
Budget
YTD
Actual
YTD
PYTD
Actual
$-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
Police Fire Parks Admin
General Fund Capital Outlay
Total Budget to Actual
Total
Budget
Actual YTD
1 of 1 GenFundGraphs
City of Meridian
General Fund Revenue
FY2017 Budget to Actual Comparison
As of 04/30/2017
Budget with
Amendments
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of
Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Taxes
General Property Tax Revenue 28,280,322.00 98,401.44 17,260,544.98 11,019,777.02 38.96%15,623,115.46
Total Taxes 28,280,322.00 98,401.44 17,260,544.98 11,019,777.02 38.97%15,623,115.46
Licenses & Permits
Liquor License Revenues 66,969.96 38,012.50 70,800.00 (3,830.04)(5.71)%69,387.50
Misc Licenses/Permits Revenues 9,999.96 1,935.00 8,362.50 1,637.46 16.37%9,882.50
Fire Inspection & Permit Fees 0.00 1,992.00 6,266.00 (6,266.00)0.00%8,035.00
Dog License Revenues 45,000.00 3,433.00 40,904.10 4,095.90 9.10%39,805.50
Total Licenses & Permits 121,969.92 45,372.50 126,332.60 (4,362.68)(3.58)%127,110.50
Intergovernmental
Grant Revenues 1,130,811.04 69,610.67 187,649.08 943,161.96 83.40%118,239.69
Grant Revenue - Capital 75,395.00 0.00 10,745.00 64,650.00 85.74%0.00
State Revenue Sharing Revenue 4,500,000.00 1,050,087.37 2,478,974.59 2,021,025.41 44.91%2,279,912.41
State Liquor Apportionment
Revenue
608,979.96 170,400.00 340,800.00 268,179.96 44.03%265,154.00
Rural Fire & Misc Revenue 1,160,109.96 84,208.05 547,113.00 612,996.96 52.83%677,678.46
Meridian Downtown Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%5,000.00
Total Intergovernmental 7,475,295.96 1,374,306.09 3,565,281.67 3,910,014.29 52.31%3,345,984.56
Franchise Fees
Gas Franchise Revenue 600,000.00 0.00 642,884.23 (42,884.23)(7.14)%608,692.58
Cable TV Franchise Revenue 225,000.00 0.00 57,994.41 167,005.59 74.22%58,330.00
Electricity Franchise Revenue 500,000.04 151,870.30 281,230.93 218,769.11 43.75%255,115.04
Total Franchise Fees 1,325,000.04 151,870.30 982,109.57 342,890.47 25.88%922,137.62
Fines & Forfeitures
False Alarm Fees 2,000.04 2,190.00 17,110.00 (15,109.96)(755.48)%1,725.00
Court Revenue 399,999.96 56,217.56 190,950.39 209,049.57 52.26%234,282.38
Restitution 0.00 114.02 1,487.46 (1,487.46)0.00%349.71
Federal Drug Seizure Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%17,659.74
State Drug Seizure Revenue 0.00 3,043.00 6,495.00 (6,495.00)0.00%14,732.88
Fines, Forfeit Revenues 5,000.04 730.00 4,615.00 385.04 7.70%5,645.00
Total Fines & Forfeitures 407,000.04 62,294.58 220,657.85 186,342.19 45.78%274,394.71
Charges for services
Passport Revenues 39,999.96 5,775.00 38,525.00 1,474.96 3.68%36,075.00
Reimbursement Revenues 30,000.00 16,482.63 100,856.54 (70,856.54)(236.18)%108,087.39
School Resource Revenue 297,500.04 174,219.00 350,337.56 (52,837.52)(17.76)%278,724.52
Rental Income 127,000.08 11,204.85 81,373.95 45,626.13 35.92%20,927.00
Park Reservations Fee Revenue 110,000.04 25,098.30 66,544.40 43,455.64 39.50%63,180.19
Recreation Class Revenues 200,000.04 39,436.74 98,274.75 101,725.29 50.86%78,520.54
Community Event Rev/Sponsorship 60,000.04 12,570.00 59,116.07 883.97 1.47%40,883.73
Sports Revenue 216,000.00 12,667.12 219,297.02 (3,297.02)(1.52)%143,769.37
Contract Service Revenues 8,000.04 260.00 1,151.01 6,849.03 85.61%812.40
Total Charges for services 1,088,500.24 297,713.64 1,015,476.30 73,023.94 6.71%770,980.14
Impact revenues
Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 186,151.68 509,008.50 (509,008.50)0.00%162,882.72
Impact Rev - Commercial 80,000.04 8,036.64 200,122.92 (120,122.88)(150.15)%114,539.09
Impact Rev - Residential 1,714,436.04 194,426.10 1,272,582.20 441,853.84 25.77%1,255,381.68
Total Impact revenues 1,794,436.08 388,614.42 1,981,713.62 (187,277.54)(10.44)%1,532,803.49
Donations
Donations (plus project code)9,181.04 1,836.10 17,515.68 (8,334.64)(90.78)%81,762.02
MAC Arts Commission Revenues 20,299.96 380.00 11,265.00 9,034.96 44.50%24,397.00
Cash Donation for Capital Outlay 425,000.00 0.00 23,387.50 401,612.50 94.49%0.00
Total Donations 454,481.00 2,216.10 52,168.18 402,312.82 88.52%106,159.02
Interest Revenues
Interest Earnings 192,000.00 103,287.65 275,752.28 (83,752.28)(43.62)%187,479.90
Total Interest Revenues 192,000.00 103,287.65 275,752.28 (83,752.28)(43.62)%187,479.90
Miscellaneous revenues
Recycled Revenue 0.00 17,052.92 22,201.21 (22,201.21)0.00%3,130.00
Miscellaneous Revenues 0.00 541.84 2,790.71 (2,790.71)0.00%6,307.96
Total Miscellaneous revenues 0.00 17,594.76 24,991.92 (24,991.92)0.00%9,437.96
TOTAL REVENUES 41,139,005.28 2,541,671.48 25,505,028.97 15,633,976.31 38.00%22,899,603.36
Sale of capital assets GAIN
Sale of Assets - Gain(Loss)0.00 9,193.00 61,742.57 (61,742.57)0.00%57,279.07
Total Sale of capital assets GAIN 0.00 9,193.00 61,742.57 (61,742.57)0.00%57,279.07
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) of REVENUES OVER
(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
41,139,005.28 2,550,864.48 25,566,771.54 15,572,233.74 37.85%22,956,882.43
1 of 1 Revenue
City of Meridian
Community Development Services
Year End Change to Fund Balance Forecast
FY2017 for Month Ending 04/30/2017
Total Original Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD Projected
TOTAL DEV. SVCS. REVENUE
Commercial Permits 850,000$ 495,833$ 643,320$ 1,000,000$
All other Permits 2,665,000$ 1,554,583$ 2,384,934$ 3,500,000$
Planning Revenue 200,000$ 116,667$ 218,977$ 375,390$
Miscellaneous Revenue -$ -$ 240$ 411$
Total Revenues 3,715,000$ 2,167,083$ 3,247,471$ 4,875,801$
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICE FUND
Revenue 3,715,000$ 2,167,083$ 3,247,471$ 4,875,801$
PC 1,384,470$ 807,609$ 766,025$ 1,313,185$
OE 2,133,647$ 1,244,627$ 1,248,115$ 2,139,626$
Net Operating to Fund Balance 196,883$ 114,847$ 1,233,331$ 1,422,990$
CO & Interfund Transfers 76,797$ 44,798$ 23,938$ 41,037$
Total Change to Fund Balance 120,086$ 70,049$ 1,209,393$ 1,381,952$
FY2003 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $585,467
FY2004 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $799,548
FY2005 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,897,123
FY2006 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,815,539
FY2007 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,172,405
FY2008 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0
FY2009 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0
FY2010 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0
FY2011 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $600,722
FY2012 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,044,914
FY2013 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,592,539
FY2014 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,391,676
FY2015 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,652,245
FY2016 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,275,054
TOTAL $17,827,232
1 of 1 CommDevForecast
City of Meridian
Community Development Services
Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons
FY2017 for Month Ending 04/30/2017
Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $YTD Variance %PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $
ADMINISTRATION
Personnel Costs 219,140$ 127,832$ 118,566$ 9,266$ 7%106,194$ 12,372$
Operating Expenses 147,151$ 85,838$ 21,834$ 64,004$ 75%20,368$ 1,466$
Total PC & OE 366,291$ 213,670$ 140,401$ 73,270$ 34%126,562$ 13,839$
Interfund Transfers 74,362$ 43,378$ 40,560$ 2,818$ 6%43,659$ (3,099)$
Fund Balance Transfer -$ 2,275,054$ 3,043,921$
PLANNING
Personnel Costs 585,917$ 341,785$ 324,512$ 17,273$ 5%315,820$ 8,692$
Operating Expenses 69,400$ 40,483$ 12,278$ 28,206$ 70%22,299$ (10,022)$
Total PC and OE 655,317$ 382,269$ 336,790$ 45,479$ 12%338,119$ (1,330)$
BUILDING
Personnel Costs 456,178$ 266,104$ 255,481$ 10,623$ 4%254,901$ 580$
Operating Expenses 1,752,245$ 1,022,143$ 1,177,032$ (154,889)$ -15%1,108,548$ 68,483$
Total PC & OE 2,208,423$ 1,288,247$ 1,432,513$ (144,266)$ -11%1,363,450$ 69,063$
Capital Outlay 31,005$ 18,086$ -$ 18,086$ 100%-$ -$
Interfund Transfers (57,254)$ (33,398)$ (32,820)$ (579)$ 2%(32,822)$ 3$
ECONOMIC DEVLP
Personnel Costs 123,235$ 71,887$ 67,465$ 4,422$ 6%65,600$ 1,865$
Operating Expenses 164,850$ 96,163$ 36,971$ 59,191$ 62%52,123$ (15,152)$
Total PC & OE 288,085$ 168,050$ 104,436$ 63,613$ 38%117,723$ (13,287)$
Interfund Transfers 28,684$ 16,732$ 16,198$ 534$ 3%14,018$ 2,180$
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICE FUND
Personnel Costs 1,384,470$ 807,609$ 766,025$ 41,584$ 5%742,516$ 23,509$
Operating Expenses 2,133,647$ 1,244,627$ 1,248,115$ (3,488)$ 0%1,203,339$ 44,776$
Total PC and OE 3,518,117$ 2,052,236$ 2,014,140$ 38,096$ 2%1,945,855$ 68,285$
Capital Outlay 31,005$ 18,086$ -$ 18,086$ 100%-$ -$
Interfund Transfers 45,792$ 26,712$ 23,938$ 2,774$ 10%24,855$ (916)$
Fund Balance Transfer -$ 2,275,054$ 3,043,921$
NOTE:
Interfund Transfers = 25.42% of City Hall costs transfer to Community Development Services
Budget to Actual Actual
City of Meridian
Building Department Permit Revenue compared to Building Inspectors Expense
FY2017 for Month Ending 04/30/2017
% of Permit Fee
Inspectors Gross Revenue Inspector Expense Rev. vs Exp.that Goes to City
Building Inspections 1,992,283$ 452,922$ 1,539,362$ 77%
Mechanical Inspections 318,795$ 191,492$ 127,303$ 40%
Electrical Inspections 213,286$ 160,838$ 52,447$ 25%
Plumbing Inspections 277,009$ 167,974$ 109,035$ 39%
Fire Inspections 232,972$ 181,508$ 51,463$ 22%
Total 3,034,345$ 1,154,734$ 1,879,611$ 62%
1 of 1 CommDev
City of Meridian
Community Development Services
FY2017 for Month Ending 4/30/2017
$1,118,733$1,316,153
$659,439
$372,654
$782,182
$1,136,207
$1,371,078
$1,299,887
$1,351,310$1,354,607
$643,320
FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017
YTD
Dollar Sales Commercial Building Permits Sold
849
606 562 562 483
768 913 765
990
1,368
722
FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017
YTD
Annual # Residential Building Permits Sold
43
210
0 0 48
196
390
604
450
188
632
FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017
YTD
Annual # Multi-Family Units Building Permits Sold
1 of 1 CommDevGraphs
City of Meridian
Overtime Graphs
FY2017 for Month Ending 4/30/2017
Projected for FY2017
TOTAL BUDGET
ACTUAL YTD
The Fire Chief breaks out OT (overtime) budget into 3 components
1. Overtime budget for Training
2. Overtime budget for Admin meetings or projects, and
3. Overtime budget for mandatory Extra Shift staffing
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
TOTAL
Projected Actual
Budget
Police
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
TOTAL
Projected Actual
Budget
Fire
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
TOTAL
Projected Actual
Budget
PW&MUBS
NOTE: SNOW-MAGEDDON caused excessive OT in January 2017
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
405,276
456,448
551,287
375,305
387,714
427,465
456,000
569,059 643,381
Police Department Overtime
Projected Actual Budget Actual
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
601,462
737,218
587,267
336,300
459,790
634,804
634,804
395,232 576,514
Fire Department Overtime
Projected Actual Budget Actual
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
32,473
30,065
38,188
24,660
10,677
10,991
26,658
31,278 42,275
Water Department Overtime
Projected Actual Budget Actual
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
46,944
50,504
50,302
35,549
42,151
42,911
47,521
47,749 60,942
WWTP Overtime
Projected Actual Budget Actual
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
21,711
25,361
30,001
26,122
19,062
19,396
19,699
20,245 44,781
Parks Department Overtime
Projected Actual Budget Actual
$0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000
Project
ed
Actual
Budget
Fire Projection vs OT Budget
Training OT
Admin OT
ExShift Staffing
1 of 1 OT
City of Meridian
Volunteer Hours
FY2017 for Month Ending 4/30/2017
MONTH Parks General Police Fire Mayor Comm Dev Clerk Total
October 832 95 79 296 1,591 30 48 2,970
November 388 111 65 47 992 37 44 1,683
December 852 57 104 31 1,167 76 31 2,317
January 324 72 65 40 475 71 36 1,083
February 334 152 73 354 370 23 71 1,376
March 509 104 80 181 175 44 54 1,146
April 630 107 78 30 229 59 26 1,159
May 0
June 0
July 0
August 0
September 0
TOTAL 3,868 697 543 979 4,998 339 310 11,733
GRAND TOTAL YTD 11,733
1 of 1 Volunteers
City of Meridian
Vacancy Report April 2017
Position Position Number FTE Fund Department HR Status Position
Vacant Date
Position Posted
Date
Position Start
Date
Admin Assistant 230 1 Enterprise PW Offer Accepted 1/9/2017 1/6/2017 5/8/2017
Management Analyst 426 1 Enterprise PW Accepting applications 4/21/2017 5/2/2017 Not yet filled
Deputy Director Utility Ops 295 1 Enterprise PW Accepting applications 2/21/2017 4/28/2017 Not yet filled
GIS Tech 302 1 Enterprise PW Offer Accepted 1/3/2017 3/2/2017 5/22/2017
Public Works Communications
Specialist 359 1 Enterprise PW No request to fill at this
time 12/9/2016 Not yet requested Not yet filled
Staff Engineer II 315 1 Enterprise PW Accepting applications 7/25/2016 8/30/2016 Not yet filled
Collection System Manager 97 1 Enterprise PW-WW Interim Manager,
Miguel Espinola 7/14/2016 8/10/2016 Not yet filled
Collection System Tech 449 1 Enterprise PW-WW Offer Accepted 3/20/2017 3/20/2017 5/22/2017
Deputy Chief/Fire Prevention 62 1 General Fire Internal Promotion 4/28/2017 N/A 5/2/2017
Fire Fighter 465 1 General Fire No request to fill at this
time 11/2/2016 Not yet requested Not yet filled
Evidence Technician 112 1 General Police Background in progress 11/15/2016 11/10/2016 Not yet filled
Police Officer 164 1 General Police Background in progress 12/8/2016 12/14/2016 Not yet filled
Police Officer 191 1 General Police Background in progress 12/21/2016 12/14/2016 Not yet filled
Police Officer 283 1 General Police Background in progress 2/24/2016 9/27/2016 Not yet filled
Police Officer 163 1 General Police Background in progress 2/8/2017 9/27/2016 Not yet filled
Police Officer 457 1 General Police Accepting applications 3/27/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled
Police Officer 438 1 General Police Accepting applications 3/28/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled
Police Officer 138 1 General Police Accepting applications 3/29/2017 4/4/2017 Not yet filled
Internal Auditor 452 1 General Council No request to fill at this
time
New position as
of 10/01/2015 Not yet requested Not yet filled
Code Enforcement Officer 201 1 General Police Background in progress 12/9/2016 11/15/2016 Not yet filled
TOTAL FTE 20
1 of 1 VacantPositions
City of Meridian
Interfund Transfers
FY2017
Effective Date General Fund Enterprise Fund
transfer expense to ENTERPRISE FUND (water & sewer fund)
15% of Mayor's Office personnel costs (except Mayor wage & benefits) transfer to Enterprise Fund FY2010 (reduces expense)increases expense
50% of Finance expenses transfer to Enterprise Fund FY2000 (reduces expense)increases expense
50% of HR expenses transfer to Enterprise Fund FY2002 (reduces expense)increases expense
50% of IT expenses transfer to Enterprise Fund FY2004 (reduces expense)increases expense
50% of Legal expenses transfer to Enterprise Fund FY2012 (reduces expense)increases expense
50% of IT Capital expense transfer to Enterprise Fud FY2016 (reduces expense)increases expense
transfer City Hall costs to the following:
13% Fire Department in the General Fund FY2009 transfers all in this fund
8.42% Parks & Recreation in the General Fund FY2009 transfers all in this fund
12.92% Community Development in the General Fund FY2009 transfers all in this fund
23.08% Public Works in the Enterprise Fund FY2009 (reduces expense)increases expense
Personnel Transfers:
Bldg Dept Mgr 50% from Building Department to Public Works FY2009 (reduces expense)increases expense
Capital Projects Mgr 50% from Other Govt to Public Works FY2009 (reduces expense)increases expense
Communications Mgr 50% from Other Govt to Public Works FY2003 (reduces expense)increases expense
1 of 1 Transfers
City of Meridian
IMPACT FUND BALANCE as of 04/30/2017
Account #Account Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
2110 - Police Department
REVENUES
34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 0.00 47,502.00 (47,502.00)
34780 Commercial Impact Revenue 20,000.00 0.00 38,912.79 (18,912.79)
34781 Residential Impact Revenue 176,436.00 0.00 97,693.40 78,742.60
Total REVENUES 196,436.00 0.00 184,108.19 12,327.81
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2210 - Fire Department
REVENUES
34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 0.00 192,874.50 (192,874.50)
34780 Commercial Impact Revenue 60,000.00 0.00 161,210.13 (101,210.13)
34781 Residential Impact Revenue 500,000.00 0.00 396,770.40 103,229.60
Total REVENUES 560,000.00 0.00 750,855.03 (190,855.03)
54000 Equipment & Supplies 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00
5200 - Parks & Recreation
REVENUES
34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 0.00 0.00 268,632.00 (268,632.00)
34781 Residential Impact Revenue 1,038,000.00 0.00 778,118.40 259,881.60
34920 Cash Donation for Capital Outlay 0.00 425,000.00 0.00 425,000.00
36100 Interest Earnings 15,000.00 0.00 72,266.53 (57,266.53)
Total REVENUES 1,053,000.00 425,000.00 1,119,016.93 358,983.07
55102 Investment Services 0.00 0.00 1,319.59 (1,319.59)
92000 Cap Outlay - Bldgs & Struct 638,000.04 (638,000.04)0.00 0.00
93415 Borup Property construction 71,859.24 0.00 160.00 71,699.24
96925 Keith Bird Legacy Park construction 637,294.92 963,498.04 233,515.77 1,367,277.19
96927 77 acre South Park 735,221.76 (38,592.30)38,321.32 658,308.14
96928 Reta Huskey Park Construction 1,461,010.20 88,439.43 145,911.26 1,403,538.37
96929 Hillsdale Park Construction 1,459,923.72 270,336.84 213,096.14 1,517,164.42
0.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,003,309.88 645,681.97 632,324.08 5,016,667.77
TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES for FY2017 5,023,309.88
Dept
FY2017 beginning
fund balance
FY2017 net
change YTD
Fund Balance
YTD
Police Department $ 801,948.00 184,108.19 986,056.19$
Fire Department $ 3,597,216.00 750,855.03 4,348,071.03$
Parks & Recreation $ 7,626,318.00 486,692.85 8,113,010.85$
TOTAL IMPACT FUND BALANCE 12,025,482.00 1,421,656.07 13,447,138.07
2.00
1 of 1 ImpactFund
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Council 1120 - Council
Council PERSONNEL COSTS
Council Administrative Wages 61,000 0 5,083 35,583 25,417 41.66%36,167
Council Wages 79,997 0 0 0 79,997 100.00%0
Council FICA (7.65%)10,786 0 315 2,155 8,631 80.02%2,273
Council PERSI 15,961 0 575 4,028 11,933 74.76%3,811
Council Workers' Comp 516 0 0 22 494 95.65%23
Council Employee Insurance 99,400 0 6,190 44,484 54,916 55.24%39,350
Council Total PERSONNEL COSTS 267,660 0 12,164 86,273 181,387 67.77%81,624
Council
Council OPERATING COSTS
Council Office Expense 500 0 0 9 491 98.20%665
Council Employee Coffee & Misc 420 0 0 180 240 57.10%75
Council Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%300
Council Pagers/Radios/Communications 0 0 38 179 (179)0.00%136
Council Business Meals 3,000 0 304 896 2,104 70.13%2,291
Council Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 100 0 0 0 100 100.00%28
Council Employee Seminars/Training 7,405 0 0 965 6,440 86.96%1,145
Council Travel - Transportation 3,320 0 0 1,278 2,042 61.51%723
Council Travel - Lodging 5,611 0 0 1,861 3,750 66.82%1,329
Council Travel - Per Diem 2,044 0 (68)432 1,612 78.88%325
Council City Training Classes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%920
Council Printing/Binding/Engraving 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%80
Council Holiday Expense 105 0 0 0 105 100.00%0
Council Total OPERATING COSTS 22,505 0 274 5,800 16,705 74.23%8,016
Council
Council DEPT EXPENDITURES 290,165 0 12,438 92,073 198,092 68.26%89,639
Council
Council Transfers
Council Personnel transfer interfund (39,998)0 0 0 (39,998)100.00%0
Council Total Transfers (39,998)0 0 0 (39,998)100.00%0
Council
Council TOTAL EXPENDITURES 250,167 0 12,438 92,073 158,094 63.19%89,639
Page 1 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Clerk 1140 - City Clerk
Clerk REVENUES
Clerk Liquor License Revenues 66,970 0 38,013 70,800 (3,830)(5.71)%69,388
Clerk Misc Licenses/Permits Revenues 10,000 0 1,935 8,363 1,637 16.37%9,883
Clerk Dept Svc Fees 40,000 (40,000)0 0 0 0.00%0
Clerk Passport Revenues 0 40,000 5,775 38,525 1,475 3.68%36,075
Clerk Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%320
Clerk Total REVENUES 116,970 0 45,723 117,688 (718)(0.61)%115,665
Clerk
Clerk PERSONNEL COSTS
Clerk Wages 357,253 26,560 33,104 209,537 174,277 45.40%191,154
Clerk Overtime Wages 916 0 0 59 857 93.60%174
Clerk FICA (7.65%)27,400 2,032 2,538 15,360 14,072 47.81%13,759
Clerk PERSI 40,545 3,007 3,747 23,726 19,825 45.52%21,658
Clerk Workers' Comp 1,175 72 0 194 1,053 84.45%227
Clerk Employee Insurance 99,400 10,650 7,751 53,507 56,543 51.37%52,232
Clerk Total PERSONNEL COSTS 526,689 42,321 47,141 302,382 266,627 46.86%279,204
Clerk
Clerk OPERATING COSTS
Clerk Office Expense 3,700 0 422 1,957 1,743 47.11%2,685
Clerk Copier Expense 7,081 0 505 2,982 4,099 57.88%3,599
Clerk Employee Coffee & Misc 420 0 0 140 280 66.70%166
Clerk Codification Expenses 6,000 0 0 1,632 4,368 72.80%2,624
Clerk Software Maintenance 25,522 0 0 2,346 23,176 90.80%3,841
Clerk Electronics Expense (under $5000)1,000 0 0 67 933 93.29%0
Clerk Furniture & Furnishings 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%6,734
Clerk Computers & Printers (IT use only)3,850 0 0 0 3,850 100.00%2,625
Clerk Contracted Labor 20,000 0 2,796 9,128 10,872 54.36%10,682
Clerk Background/Employment Testing 6,000 0 1,406 1,557 4,443 74.05%2,027
Clerk Telephone/Internet 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%433
Clerk Postage & Mailings 6,300 0 667 3,274 3,026 48.03%4,175
Clerk Pagers/Radios/Communications 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%70
Clerk Cellphone Expense 600 0 74 296 304 50.58%78
Page 2 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Clerk Business Meals 100 0 0 25 75 74.98%40
Clerk Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 0 0 0 5 (5)0.00%0
Clerk Employee Seminars/Training 4,760 0 0 60 4,700 98.73%178
Clerk Travel - Transportation 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%283
Clerk Travel - Lodging 350 0 0 0 350 100.00%0
Clerk Travel - Per Diem 201 0 0 0 201 100.00%89
Clerk City Training Classes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%153
Clerk Legal Notices 2,000 0 215 215 1,785 89.24%180
Clerk Printing/Binding/Engraving 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%348
Clerk Dues,Licenses,Publications 90 0 0 90 0 0.00%135
Clerk Holiday Expense 105 0 0 114 (9)(8.09)%105
Clerk Elections 100 0 0 0 100 100.00%0
Clerk Bank & Merchant Charges 0 0 1 0 0 0.00%(1)
Clerk Total OPERATING COSTS 89,179 0 6,086 23,888 65,291 73.21%41,252
Clerk DEPT EXPENDITURES 615,868 42,321 53,227 326,270 331,918 50.42%320,455
Clerk
Clerk TOTAL EXPENDITURES 615,868 42,321 53,227 326,270 331,918 50.42%320,455
Page 3 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Mayor 1310 - Mayor's Office
Mayor REVENUES
Mayor Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 0 1,507 (1,507)0.00%0
Mayor Community Event Rev/Sponsorship 20,000 0 0 29,070 (9,070)(45.34)%26,480
Mayor Donations (plus project code)5,000 0 1,746 4,675 325 6.50%11,662
Mayor Total REVENUES 25,000 0 1,746 35,252 (10,252)(41.01)%38,142
Mayor
Mayor PERSONNEL COSTS
Mayor Administrative Wages 90,959 0 7,580 51,975 38,984 42.85%49,500
Mayor Wages 221,010 4,392 18,048 129,603 95,799 42.50%124,276
Mayor Overtime Wages 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%70
Mayor FICA (7.65%)23,866 336 1,875 13,187 11,015 45.51%12,537
Mayor PERSI 35,315 497 2,901 19,807 16,005 44.69%19,679
Mayor Workers' Comp 1,284 20 0 192 1,112 85.23%227
Mayor Employee Insurance 71,000 0 6,036 41,931 29,069 40.94%44,893
Mayor Total PERSONNEL COSTS 443,434 5,245 36,439 256,695 191,984 42.79%251,183
Mayor
Mayor OPERATING COSTS
Mayor Office Expense 2,750 0 45 439 2,311 84.02%701
Mayor Copier Expense 2,400 0 111 517 1,883 78.46%(113)
Mayor Employee Coffee & Misc 600 0 16 175 425 70.85%167
Mayor Fuels - Gas 1,500 0 37 299 1,201 80.03%335
Mayor Clothing Expense 1,000 0 0 992 8 0.80%750
Mayor Community Events Expenses 8,300 0 5,663 14,121 (5,821)(70.13)%8,904
Mayor Vehicle Repair 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%25
Mayor Vehicle Maintenance 500 0 76 76 424 84.83%202
Mayor Software Maintenance 1,973 0 0 560 1,413 71.61%836
Mayor Misc Contributions 0 0 0 1,000 (1,000)0.00%0
Mayor Electronics Expense (under $5000)500 0 0 122 379 75.69%0
Mayor Furniture & Furnishings 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%0
Mayor Computers & Printers (IT use only)2,000 0 0 0 2,000 100.00%974
Mayor Professional Services 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 100.00%0
Mayor Contracted Labor 100 0 0 0 100 100.00%0
Page 4 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Mayor Postage & Mailings 1,250 0 19 272 978 78.23%514
Mayor Pagers/Radios/Communications 240 0 38 136 104 43.31%122
Mayor Cellphone Expense 2,400 0 189 1,144 1,256 52.33%1,248
Mayor Business Meals 2,500 0 12 1,471 1,029 41.15%1,890
Mayor Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 250 0 0 107 143 57.19%112
Mayor Employee Seminars/Training 10,475 0 162 2,739 7,736 73.84%2,910
Mayor Travel - Transportation 7,828 0 0 6,331 1,497 19.12%5,766
Mayor Travel - Lodging 9,624 0 (10)7,069 2,555 26.54%7,517
Mayor Travel - Per Diem 2,835 0 0 982 1,854 65.37%749
Mayor City Training Classes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%307
Mayor Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 250 0 0 20 230 91.99%0
Mayor Printing/Binding/Engraving 600 0 0 614 (14)(2.26)%518
Mayor Bldg & Structures Rental & Lease 350 0 0 0 350 100.00%0
Mayor Dues,Licenses,Publications 1,157 0 250 995 163 14.04%1,188
Mayor Holiday Expense 75 0 0 75 0 0.00%275
Mayor Volunteer Appreciation expense 550 0 0 0 550 100.00%0
Mayor Total OPERATING COSTS 68,007 0 6,608 40,256 27,752 40.81%35,896
Mayor
Mayor DEPT EXPENDITURES 511,441 5,245 43,047 296,951 219,735 42.52%287,079
Mayor
Mayor
Mayor Transfers
Mayor Personnel transfer interfund (77,587)0 (6,246)(42,872)(34,715)44.74%(39,219)
Mayor Total Transfers (77,587)0 (6,246)(42,872)(34,715)44.74%(39,219)
Mayor
Mayor TOTAL EXPENDITURES 433,854 5,245 36,801 254,079 185,021 42.13%247,861
Page 5 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Finance 1500 - Finance Department
Finance PERSONNEL COSTS
Finance Wages 614,934 (26,560)47,798 335,279 253,095 43.01%370,815
Finance Overtime Wages 0 0 0 65 (65)0.00%90
Finance FICA (7.65%)47,042 (2,032)3,495 24,528 20,482 45.50%27,177
Finance PERSI 69,610 (3,007)5,411 37,961 28,642 43.00%41,986
Finance Workers' Comp 2,525 (72)0 360 2,093 85.32%380
Finance Employee Insurance 142,000 (10,650)9,268 65,405 65,945 50.20%68,623
Finance Total PERSONNEL COSTS 876,111 (42,321)65,972 463,598 370,192 44.40%509,071
Finance
Finance OPERATING COSTS
Finance Office Expense 5,000 0 940 3,546 1,454 29.08%2,405
Finance Employee Coffee & Misc 600 0 126 415 185 30.90%64
Finance Software Maintenance 15,924 15,000 0 21,231 9,693 31.34%10,816
Finance Electronics Expense (under $5000)450 0 0 253 197 43.77%382
Finance Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)36,000 (15,000)0 14,677 6,323 30.10%0
Finance Furniture & Furnishings 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%484
Finance Computers & Printers (IT use only)4,000 0 0 0 4,000 100.00%0
Finance Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%2,071
Finance Audit & Accounting Services 52,500 0 0 47,000 5,500 10.47%46,000
Finance Investment Services 20,000 0 1,350 9,459 10,541 52.70%9,397
Finance Postage & Mailings 2,800 0 193 1,247 1,553 55.46%1,231
Finance Cellphone Expense 600 0 74 296 304 50.58%303
Finance Business Meals 640 0 0 25 615 96.09%52
Finance Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 0 0 0 86 (86)0.00%66
Finance Employee Seminars/Training 11,634 0 175 3,644 7,990 68.67%2,759
Finance Travel - Transportation 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 100.00%0
Finance Travel - Lodging 1,750 0 0 0 1,750 100.00%0
Finance Travel - Per Diem 600 0 0 0 600 100.00%0
Finance City Training Classes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%153
Finance Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 0 0 95 95 (95)0.00%0
Finance Legal Notices 3,000 0 105 207 2,793 93.11%206
Finance Printing/Binding/Engraving 5,000 0 0 1,989 3,011 60.21%1,931
Page 6 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Finance Dues,Licenses,Publications 3,001 0 0 980 2,021 67.34%1,770
Finance Holiday Expense 150 0 0 119 31 20.85%140
Finance Bank & Merchant Charges 0 0 56 112 (112)0.00%32
Finance Total OPERATING COSTS 165,149 0 3,113 105,381 59,768 36.19%80,263
Finance
Finance DEPT EXPENDITURES 1,041,260 (42,321)69,085 568,979 429,960 43.04%589,334
Finance Transfers
Finance
Finance Personnel transfer interfund (438,056)0 (32,986)(231,799)(206,257)47.08%(254,535)
Finance Operating transfer interfund (82,574)0 (882)(42,474)(40,100)48.56%(35,356)
Finance Total Transfers (520,630)0 (33,868)(274,273)(246,357)47.32%(289,891)
Finance
Finance TOTAL EXPENDITURES 520,630 (42,321)35,217 294,706 183,603 38.38%299,442
Page 7 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
IT 1510 - Information Technology
IT PERSONNEL COSTS
IT Wages 931,969 0 75,367 505,098 426,871 45.80%448,517
IT Wages - Seasonal/Parttime 19,200 0 1,213 8,039 11,161 58.12%3,389
IT Overtime Wages 110 13,042 869 4,407 8,746 66.49%0
IT FICA (7.65%)72,772 998 5,568 37,298 36,472 49.44%32,831
IT PERSI 105,510 1,476 8,630 57,343 49,643 46.40%50,537
IT Workers' Comp 6,819 306 0 626 6,499 91.21%542
IT Employee Insurance 213,000 0 17,198 117,567 95,433 44.80%107,828
IT Total PERSONNEL COSTS 1,349,380 15,822 108,844 730,377 634,825 46.50%643,644
IT
IT OPERATING COSTS
IT Office Expense 1,200 0 20 546 654 54.53%353
IT Copier Expense 4,000 0 0 645 3,355 83.87%320
IT Employee Coffee & Misc 1,080 0 0 541 539 49.91%430
IT Safety Expense 100 0 0 84 16 16.01%0
IT Fuels - Gas 800 0 42 261 539 67.32%235
IT Vehicle Repair 500 0 0 422 78 15.59%405
IT Vehicle Maintenance 500 0 0 284 216 43.16%39
IT Software Maintenance 143,005 0 4,786 114,262 28,743 20.09%101,781
IT Equipment & Supplies 100 0 0 0 100 100.00%0
IT Electronics Expense (under $5000)40,000 (5,000)1,170 26,273 8,727 24.93%10,245
IT Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)51,461 5,000 630 24,365 32,095 56.84%20,483
IT Furniture & Furnishings 11,800 0 0 10,398 1,402 11.88%2,694
IT Computers & Printers (IT use only)8,600 0 0 86 8,514 98.99%19,239
IT Professional Services 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 100.00%0
IT Telephone/Internet 17,800 0 1,262 8,832 8,968 50.38%8,792
IT Postage & Mailings 150 0 0 62 88 58.86%0
IT Pagers/Radios/Communications 1,800 0 436 1,420 380 21.11%888
IT Cellphone Expense 4,200 0 258 1,806 2,394 57.00%1,428
IT Business Meals 100 0 0 0 100 100.00%0
IT Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 100 0 10 20 80 79.99%39
IT Employee Seminars/Training 44,500 0 0 11,055 33,445 75.15%10,705
Page 8 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
IT Travel - Transportation 8,000 0 0 278 7,722 96.52%2,537
IT Travel - Lodging 5,500 0 0 0 5,500 100.00%3,329
IT Travel - Per Diem 2,600 0 0 306 2,294 88.23%1,457
IT Printing/Binding/Engraving 100 0 0 0 100 100.00%0
IT Dues,Licenses,Publications 0 0 0 135 (135)0.00%0
IT Holiday Expense 270 0 0 270 0 0.00%231
IT Total OPERATING COSTS 378,266 0 8,614 202,351 175,915 46.51%185,630
IT
IT Capital Outlay
IT Capital - Computers & Printers 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 100.00%29,131
IT Total Capital Outlay 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 100.00%29,131
IT
IT DEPT EXPENDITURES 1,747,646 15,822 117,459 932,729 830,739 47.10%858,405
IT
IT Transfers
IT Personnel transfer interfund (674,690)0 (54,422)(365,189)(309,501)45.87%(321,822)
IT Operating transfer interfund (199,133)0 (4,307)(98,055)(101,078)50.75%(107,166)
IT Total Transfers (873,823)0 (58,729)(463,243)(410,580)46.99%(428,988)
IT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 873,823 15,822 58,729 469,485 420,160 47.22%429,416
Page 9 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Legal 1520 - Legal Dept
Legal PERSONNEL COSTS
Legal Wages 501,973 0 41,208 289,337 212,636 42.36%282,422
Legal FICA (7.65%)38,401 0 3,007 20,956 17,445 45.42%20,541
Legal PERSI 56,823 0 4,665 32,753 24,070 42.35%31,970
Legal Workers' Comp 1,342 0 0 203 1,139 84.86%210
Legal Employee Insurance 72,315 0 5,190 39,442 32,873 45.45%41,687
Legal Total PERSONNEL COSTS 670,854 0 54,070 382,691 288,163 42.95%376,831
Legal
Legal OPERATING COSTS
Legal Office Expense 2,500 0 54 1,104 1,396 55.82%978
Legal Employee Coffee & Misc 300 0 0 76 224 74.70%48
Legal Software Maintenance 1,546 0 0 840 706 45.65%1,163
Legal Electronics Expense (under $5000)500 0 0 349 151 30.12%0
Legal Furniture & Furnishings 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%0
Legal Computers & Printers (IT use only)800 0 0 0 800 100.00%974
Legal Legal Services 30,000 0 2,719 58,352 (28,352)(94.50)%14,363
Legal Postage & Mailings 150 0 15 39 111 73.78%52
Legal Pagers/Radios/Communications 240 0 38 138 102 42.58%122
Legal Cellphone Expense 1,800 0 84 588 1,212 67.33%714
Legal Business Meals 100 0 7 54 46 45.98%107
Legal Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 100 0 0 48 52 51.73%62
Legal Employee Seminars/Training 4,000 0 0 814 3,186 79.64%873
Legal Travel - Transportation 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 100.00%257
Legal Travel - Lodging 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 100.00%847
Legal Travel - Per Diem 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%320
Legal City Training Classes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%153
Legal Printing/Binding/Engraving 150 0 0 0 150 100.00%0
Legal Dues,Licenses,Publications 10,162 0 1,033 5,533 4,629 45.55%6,098
Legal Holiday Expense 75 0 0 72 3 3.53%85
Legal Total OPERATING COSTS 55,423 0 3,950 68,008 (12,585)(22.71)%27,214
Legal
Legal DEPT EXPENDITURES 726,277 0 58,021 450,699 275,577 37.94%404,045
Page 10 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Legal
Legal Transfers
Legal Personnel transfer interfund (335,427)0 (27,035)(191,346)(144,081)42.95%(188,415)
Legal Operating transfer interfund (27,712)0 (616)(4,222)(23,490)84.76%(6,374)
Legal Total Transfers (363,139)0 (27,651)(195,567)(167,572)46.15%(194,790)
Legal
Legal TOTAL EXPENDITURES 363,138 0 30,370 255,132 108,006 29.74%209,255
Page 11 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
HR 1540 - Human Resources
HR PERSONNEL COSTS
HR Wages 254,431 0 22,019 150,914 103,517 40.68%148,710
HR Wages - Seasonal/Parttime 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 100.00%0
HR FICA (7.65%)20,994 0 1,584 10,883 10,111 48.16%10,823
HR PERSI 28,802 0 2,493 17,083 11,719 40.68%16,006
HR Workers' Comp 741 0 0 140 601 81.13%189
HR Employee Insurance 136,000 0 10,404 73,242 62,758 46.14%71,579
HR Total PERSONNEL COSTS 460,968 0 36,499 252,262 208,706 45.28%247,306
HR
HR OPERATING COSTS
HR Office Expense 4,500 0 169 3,279 1,221 27.13%3,281
HR Copier Expense 5,526 0 580 3,552 1,974 35.72%3,711
HR Employee Coffee & Misc 300 0 0 (3)303 101.03%207
HR Software Maintenance 19,200 0 0 15,352 3,848 20.04%10,483
HR Electronics Expense (under $5000)500 0 10 109 391 78.27%919
HR Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)0 0 0 0 0 0.00%3,955
HR Furniture & Furnishings 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%101
HR Professional Services 38,500 (6,000)0 4,975 27,525 84.69%13,651
HR Background/Employment Testing 11,500 0 2,335 5,881 5,619 48.86%4,939
HR Postage & Mailings 400 0 19 199 201 50.33%122
HR Pagers/Radios/Communications 240 0 0 0 240 100.00%18
HR Cellphone Expense 2,400 0 110 770 1,630 67.91%855
HR Business Meals 100 0 0 50 49 49.50%0
HR Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 100 0 0 12 88 87.99%12
HR Employee Seminars/Training 7,600 0 0 1,616 5,984 78.73%1,224
HR City Training Classes 34,000 6,000 4,000 12,070 27,929 69.82%16,008
HR Wellness Program 17,000 0 602 7,520 9,480 55.76%7,961
HR Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 14,000 0 150 13,413 587 4.19%8,283
HR Printing/Binding/Engraving 500 0 0 713 (213)(42.67)%839
HR Dues,Licenses,Publications 8,442 0 3,249 7,419 1,023 12.11%4,745
HR Holiday Expense 75 0 0 0 75 100.00%0
HR Employee Education Reimbursement 12,000 0 417 2,417 9,583 79.85%6,988
Page 12 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
HR Employee Longevity awards 5,500 0 25 1,547 3,953 71.87%86
HR Total OPERATING COSTS 182,883 0 11,664 80,891 101,992 55.77%88,389
HR
HR DEPT EXPENDITURES 643,851 0 48,163 333,153 310,698 48.25%335,695
HR
HR Transfers
HR Personnel transfer interfund (197,984)0 (18,250)(126,131)(71,853)36.29%(123,653)
HR Operating transfer interfund (91,442)0 (5,832)(40,321)(51,121)55.90%(45,310)
HR
HR Total Transfers (289,426)0 (24,082)(166,452)(122,974)42.49%(168,963)
HR
HR TOTAL EXPENDITURES 354,425 0 24,082 166,702 187,723 52.96%166,732
Page 13 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Oth Gov 1840 - Other Govt/St Lighting
Oth Gov REVENUES
Oth Gov General Property Tax Revenue 28,280,322 0 98,401 17,260,545 11,019,777 38.96%15,623,115
Oth Gov Gas Franchise Revenue 600,000 0 0 642,884 (42,884)(7.14)%608,693
Oth Gov Cable TV Franchise Revenue 225,000 0 0 57,994 167,006 74.22%58,330
Oth Gov Electricity Franchise Revenue 500,000 0 151,870 281,231 218,769 43.75%255,115
Oth Gov Grant Revenues 356,324 373,527 22,205 71,579 658,272 90.19%50,234
Oth Gov Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 0 182 (182)0.00%0
Oth Gov State Revenue Sharing Revenue 4,500,000 0 1,050,087 2,478,975 2,021,025 44.91%2,279,912
Oth Gov State Liquor Apportionment Revenue 608,980 0 170,400 340,800 268,180 44.03%265,154
Oth Gov Restitution 0 0 0 436 (436)0.00%0
Oth Gov Meridian Downtown Development 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%5,000
Oth Gov Recycled Revenue 0 0 17,053 22,201 (22,201)0.00%2,077
Oth Gov Donations (plus project code)0 0 0 0 0 0.00%59,874
Oth Gov MAC Arts Commission Revenues 10,000 10,300 380 11,265 9,035 44.50%24,397
Oth Gov Interest Earnings 177,000 0 75,827 203,486 (26,486)(14.96)%143,617
Oth Gov Total REVENUES 35,257,626 383,827 1,586,224 21,371,578 14,269,875 40.04%19,375,518
Oth Gov
Oth Gov PERSONNEL COSTS
Oth Gov Wages 142,148 0 11,836 82,516 59,632 41.95%74,815
Oth Gov Wages - Seasonal/Parttime 6,000 0 436 2,664 3,336 55.60%2,544
Oth Gov FICA (7.65%)11,334 0 911 6,313 5,021 44.29%5,711
Oth Gov PERSI 16,091 0 1,340 9,341 6,750 41.94%8,469
Oth Gov Workers' Comp 3,009 0 0 472 2,537 84.31%450
Oth Gov Employee Insurance 28,400 0 2,350 16,439 11,961 42.11%16,159
Oth Gov Total PERSONNEL COSTS 206,982 0 16,874 117,745 89,237 43.11%108,148
Oth Gov
Oth Gov OPERATING COSTS
Oth Gov Office Expense 1,500 0 0 659 841 56.05%853
Oth Gov Copier Expense 7,226 (10)735 2,122 5,094 70.59%0
Oth Gov Employee Coffee & Misc 180 0 0 139 41 22.87%60
Oth Gov Safety Expense 0 0 0 640 (640)0.00%0
Oth Gov Fuels - Gas 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%18
Page 14 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Oth Gov Community Events Expenses 20,000 (12,961)0 7,039 0 0.00%0
Oth Gov Building Maintenance 2,500 0 0 3,972 (1,472)(58.87)%798
Oth Gov Parking/Asphalt Maintenance 2,500 0 0 0 2,500 100.00%0
Oth Gov Street Light/Signs Repairs/Maintenance30,001 0 1,674 12,855 17,146 57.14%16,221
Oth Gov Grounds Maintenance 300 0 0 0 300 100.00%0
Oth Gov Software Maintenance 330 0 0 465 (135)(40.83)%313
Oth Gov Alarm Service/Sprinkler System 1,200 0 30 947 253 21.08%923
Oth Gov Historical Preservation 16,025 3,500 0 6,639 12,886 65.99%39
Oth Gov Misc Contributions 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 100.00%0
Oth Gov Transportation Services 160,194 0 0 160,194 0 0.00%117,243
Oth Gov Senior Transportation 30,000 0 8,253 3,357 26,643 88.81%6,873
Oth Gov Allumbaugh House 57,460 3,503 14,365 43,095 17,868 29.30%43,095
Oth Gov Equipment & Supplies 179,000 202,000 0 4,059 376,942 98.93%26,905
Oth Gov Electronics Expense (under $5000)250 0 0 86 164 65.71%0
Oth Gov Professional Services 112,730 0 3,650 3,650 109,080 96.76%10,957
Oth Gov Arts Commission Expenses 26,501 8,553 5,007 9,658 25,396 72.44%7,379
Oth Gov Contracted Services 0 0 0 71,510 (71,510)0.00%0
Oth Gov Telephone/Internet 0 0 119 427 (427)0.00%430
Oth Gov Postage & Mailings 3,975 0 89 1,534 2,441 61.42%1,254
Oth Gov Cellphone Expense 600 0 74 355 245 40.76%642
Oth Gov Business Meals 100 0 0 0 100 100.00%28
Oth Gov Employee Seminars/Training 1,025 0 0 0 1,025 100.00%0
Oth Gov Travel - Transportation 650 0 0 0 650 100.00%0
Oth Gov Travel - Lodging 850 0 0 0 850 100.00%0
Oth Gov Travel - Per Diem 400 0 0 0 400 100.00%0
Oth Gov Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 7,450 0 93 6,679 771 10.35%0
Oth Gov Printing/Binding/Engraving 1,850 0 0 0 1,850 100.00%422
Oth Gov Insurance Premium/Claims 0 0 (6,942)(6,942)6,942 0.00%6,081
Oth Gov Electricity - Idaho Power 320,000 0 25,804 158,062 161,938 50.60%174,819
Oth Gov Dues,Licenses,Publications 72,567 0 7,126 57,826 14,741 20.31%57,906
Oth Gov Irrigation Taxes 300 0 0 163 137 45.53%327
Oth Gov ADA Compliance 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 100.00%162
Oth Gov Holiday Expense 45 0 0 44 1 3.15%33
Page 15 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Oth Gov Miscellaneous Expense 4,130 20 0 (2)4,152 100.05%0
Oth Gov Volunteer Appreciation expense 2,500 0 0 291 2,209 88.34%1,991
Oth Gov Grant Expenditures 356,324 220,027 29,806 87,210 489,141 84.86%50,234
Oth Gov Total OPERATING COSTS 1,450,662 424,632 89,883 636,730 1,238,565 66.05%526,005
Oth Gov
Oth Gov Capital Outlay
Oth Gov Capital - Signs/Art 186,694 (60,529)0 1,500 124,665 98.81%5,000
Oth Gov Total Capital Outlay 186,694 (60,529)0 1,500 124,665 98.81%5,000
Oth Gov
Oth Gov DEPT EXPENDITURES 1,844,338 364,103 106,757 755,975 1,452,467 65.76%639,153
Oth Gov
Oth Gov Transfers
Oth Gov Personnel transfer interfund (103,491)0 (8,437)(58,101)(45,390)43.85%(54,074)
Oth Gov Operating transfer interfund 0 (37,500)0 0 (37,500)100.00%0
Oth Gov Total Transfers (103,491)(37,500)(8,437)(58,101)(82,890)58.79%(54,074)
Oth Gov
Oth Gov Interfund Cash Transfers
Oth Gov Operating Transfer In 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%(3,043,921)
Oth Gov Transfer of Equity (37,500)37,500 0 (2,275,054)2,275,054 0.00%353,986
Oth Gov Total Interfund Cash Transfers (37,500)37,500 0 (2,275,054)2,275,054 0.00%(2,689,935)
Oth Gov
Oth Gov TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,703,347 364,103 98,320 (1,577,180)3,644,630 176.28%(2,104,856)
Page 16 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
City Hall 1850 - City Hall
City Hall REVENUES
City Hall Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 0 487 (487)0.00%272
City Hall Rental Income 20,000 0 1,681 11,707 8,293 41.46%11,627
City Hall Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%1,735
City Hall Total REVENUES 20,000 0 1,681 12,194 7,806 39.03%13,634
City Hall
City Hall PERSONNEL COSTS
City Hall Wages 103,436 0 9,150 60,407 43,028 41.59%58,811
City Hall Overtime Wages 452 0 0 622 (170)(37.51)%982
City Hall FICA (7.65%)7,947 0 665 4,436 3,512 44.18%4,356
City Hall PERSI 11,760 0 1,036 6,909 4,852 41.25%6,769
City Hall Workers' Comp 3,771 0 0 597 3,174 84.15%584
City Hall Employee Insurance 28,400 0 1,986 13,857 14,543 51.20%13,523
City Hall Total PERSONNEL COSTS 155,766 0 12,837 86,827 68,939 44.26%85,024City Hall
City Hall OPERATING COSTS
City Hall Office Expense 1,200 0 114 127 1,073 89.43%495
City Hall Employee Coffee & Misc 120 0 4 14 106 88.15%0
City Hall Janitorial 127,150 9,000 7,413 66,067 70,083 51.47%55,398
City Hall Safety Expense 300 0 0 28 272 90.54%0
City Hall Shop Supplies 2,500 0 33 474 2,026 81.03%953
City Hall Fuels - Gas 1,000 0 28 321 679 67.87%206
City Hall Clothing Expense 200 0 0 23 177 88.67%0
City Hall Medical Supplies 0 0 0 208 (208)0.00%131
City Hall Building Maintenance 109,071 53,143 8,869 41,048 121,166 74.69%72,646
City Hall Parking/Asphalt Maintenance 6,430 0 0 5,970 460 7.15%2,448
City Hall Vehicle Repair 2,000 0 0 119 1,881 94.05%277
City Hall Vehicle Maintenance 2,000 0 50 178 1,822 91.09%53
City Hall Equipment Maintenance & Repair 200 0 45 112 88 44.18%302
City Hall Alarm Service/Sprinkler System 17,177 0 10,644 12,354 4,823 28.07%11,747
City Hall Equipment & Supplies 4,000 0 0 1,755 2,245 56.13%632
City Hall Electronics Expense (under $5000)1,500 0 0 11 1,489 99.26%122
City Hall Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)0 0 0 0 0 0.00%370
City Hall Computers & Printers (IT use only)1,550 0 0 0 1,550 100.00%974
Page 17 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
City Hall Telephone/Internet 350 0 276 1,112 (761)(217.54)%1,141
City Hall Postage & Mailings 3,492 0 0 1,609 1,883 53.92%1,695
City Hall Pagers/Radios/Communications 480 0 38 117 363 75.64%0
City Hall Cellphone Expense 1,200 0 180 690 510 42.48%563
City Hall Employee Seminars/Training 3,000 0 0 0 3,000 100.00%275
City Hall Travel - Transportation 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%0
City Hall Travel - Lodging 250 0 0 0 250 100.00%0
City Hall Travel - Per Diem 200 0 0 0 200 100.00%0
City Hall Legal Notices 0 0 0 73 (73)0.00%0
City Hall Printing/Binding/Engraving 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 100.00%739
City Hall Insurance Premium/Claims 21,646 0 0 19,046 2,600 12.01%21,273
City Hall Electricity - Idaho Power 95,000 0 6,867 47,840 47,160 49.64%46,907
City Hall Intermountain Gas 15,000 0 981 10,154 4,846 32.30%10,107
City Hall Equipment Rental & Lease 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%365
City Hall Bldg & Structures Rental & Lease 20,312 0 1,693 11,799 8,513 41.91%13,099
City Hall Dues,Licenses,Publications 1,378 0 0 349 1,029 74.67%643
City Hall Irrigation Taxes 200 0 0 346 (146)(73.11)%139
City Hall Holiday Expense 30 0 0 30 0 0.00%30
City Hall Penalties/Settlements/Forfeitures 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%8
City Hall Total OPERATING COSTS 441,436 62,143 37,233 221,974 281,605 55.92%243,738
City Hall Capital Outlay
City Hall Improvement - pavement sidewalks 27,208 0 0 0 27,208 100.00%0
City Hall Capital - Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%40,204
City Hall CIP - Municipal Center 513,483 (69,387)134,491 143,779 300,317 67.62%36,703
City Hall Total Capital Outlay 540,691 (69,387)134,491 143,779 327,525 69.49%76,907
City Hall
City Hall DEPT EXPENDITURES 1,137,893 (7,244)184,561 452,581 678,068 59.97%405,668City Hall
City Hall Transfers
City Hall Personnel transfer interfund (89,441)0 (7,371)(49,856)(39,585)44.25%(48,821)
City Hall Operating transfer interfund (241,043)0 (21,379)(130,403)(110,640)45.90%(145,213)
City Hall Total Transfers (330,484)0 (28,750)(180,259)(150,225)45.46%(194,034)
City Hall
City Hall TOTAL EXPENDITURES 807,409 (7,244)155,811 272,322 527,844 65.96%211,635
Page 18 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
ComDev 1910 - Community Development Depts
ComDev REVENUES
ComDev Bldg Permits - Residential Revenue 1,300,000 0 168,467 1,076,480 223,520 17.19%1,014,271
ComDev Plumbing Permit Revenues 325,000 0 48,991 277,009 47,991 14.76%243,521
ComDev Mechanical Permit Revenues 450,000 0 56,320 318,795 131,205 29.15%349,888
ComDev Electrical Permit Revenues 250,000 0 41,392 213,286 36,714 14.68%232,390
ComDev Fire Inspection & Permit Fees 300,000 0 41,455 226,706 73,294 24.43%192,738
ComDev Bldg Permits - Multifamily Revenue 40,000 0 107,270 272,484 (232,484)(581.21)%74,304
ComDev Bldg Permits - Commercial Revenue 850,000 0 63,462 643,320 206,680 24.31%712,452
ComDev Flood Plain Permit Revenue 0 0 0 175 (175)0.00%300
ComDev Filing Fees - Revenues 200,000 0 48,251 204,181 (4,181)(2.09)%227,876
ComDev Grant Revenues 0 0 7,422 14,797 (14,797)0.00%7,066
ComDev Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 0 2,395 (2,395)0.00%20
ComDev Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 20 240 (240)0.00%200
ComDev Total REVENUES 3,715,000 0 583,050 3,249,866 465,134 12.52%3,055,025
ComDev
ComDev PERSONNEL COSTS
ComDev Wages 981,080 0 80,627 542,939 438,141 44.65%523,356
ComDev Wages - Seasonal/Parttime 0 0 2,941 15,029 (15,029)0.00%12,465
ComDev Overtime Wages 332 0 0 0 332 100.00%151
ComDev FICA (7.65%)74,874 0 6,164 41,125 33,749 45.07%39,629
ComDev PERSI 110,793 0 9,460 63,078 47,715 43.06%60,672
ComDev Workers' Comp 4,391 0 0 664 3,727 84.86%627
ComDev Employee Insurance 213,000 0 15,066 103,189 109,811 51.55%105,615
ComDev Total PERSONNEL COSTS 1,384,470 0 114,258 766,025 618,445 44.67%742,516
ComDev
ComDev OPERATING COSTS
ComDev Office Expense 3,500 0 231 1,017 2,483 70.94%1,674
ComDev Copier Expense 7,096 0 961 3,803 3,293 46.40%4,144
ComDev Employee Coffee & Misc 1,560 0 102 164 1,396 89.50%153
ComDev Fuels - Gas 500 0 0 46 454 90.77%156
ComDev Building Maintenance 1,800 (1,800)0 0 0 0.00%0
ComDev Vehicle Repair 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%0
Page 19 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
ComDev Vehicle Maintenance 500 0 189 189 312 62.30%32
ComDev Software Maintenance 20,210 0 0 18,823 1,387 6.86%21,160
ComDev Electronics Expense (under $5000)2,000 0 115 220 1,780 88.99%595
ComDev Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)700 597 0 695 602 46.41%1,445
ComDev Furniture & Furnishings 500 0 0 624 (124)(24.79)%133
ComDev Computers & Printers (IT use only)6,650 0 0 0 6,650 100.00%29,804
ComDev Professional Services 139,000 0 3,125 11,400 127,600 91.79%17,958
ComDev Contracted Labor 43,500 0 1,528 2,864 40,636 93.41%3,751
ComDev Building Inspections 650,475 0 81,441 452,922 197,553 30.37%387,424
ComDev Mechanical Inspections 292,500 0 33,792 191,492 101,008 34.53%227,427
ComDev Electrical Inspections 162,500 0 28,974 160,838 1,662 1.02%151,419
ComDev Plumbing Inspections 195,000 0 29,395 167,974 27,026 13.85%146,113
ComDev Fire Inspections 413,910 0 31,999 181,508 232,402 56.14%142,886
ComDev Telephone/Internet 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%297
ComDev Postage & Mailings 750 0 36 276 474 63.23%199
ComDev Pagers/Radios/Communications 7,680 0 859 3,071 4,609 60.01%3,522
ComDev Cellphone Expense 3,600 0 285 1,632 1,968 54.68%1,591
ComDev Business Meals 1,100 0 29 1,103 (3)(0.30)%243
ComDev Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 100 0 0 28 72 72.48%13
ComDev Employee Seminars/Training 11,825 0 1,600 3,463 8,362 70.71%3,852
ComDev Travel - Transportation 7,035 0 818 1,594 5,442 77.34%1,720
ComDev Travel - Lodging 8,300 0 837 2,998 5,302 63.87%1,349
ComDev Travel - Per Diem 3,150 0 832 1,387 1,763 55.96%970
ComDev City Training Classes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%153
ComDev Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 14,000 0 8,634 11,634 2,366 16.89%3,041
ComDev Legal Notices 10,400 0 889 4,198 6,202 59.63%8,218
ComDev Printing/Binding/Engraving 6,000 0 668 2,590 3,410 56.83%3,476
ComDev Dues,Licenses,Publications 42,858 0 280 18,616 24,243 56.56%37,804
ComDev Commission Expense 200 0 0 0 200 100.00%0
ComDev Holiday Expense 450 0 0 400 50 11.06%326
ComDev Meridian Development 75,000 0 0 0 75,000 100.00%0
ComDev Bank & Merchant Charges 0 0 0 (10)10 0.00%1
ComDev Suspense (no receipts)0 0 82 82 (82)0.00%0
Page 20 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
ComDev Grant Expenditures 0 0 0 476 (476)0.00%292
ComDev Total OPERATING COSTS 2,134,850 (1,203)227,701 1,248,115 885,531 41.50%1,203,339
ComDev
ComDev Capital Outlay
ComDev Capital - Software 31,602 (597)0 0 31,005 100.00%0
ComDev Total Capital Outlay 31,602 (597)0 0 31,005 100.00%0
ComDev
ComDev DEPT EXPENDITURES 3,550,922 (1,800)341,959 2,014,140 1,534,982 43.24%1,945,855
ComDev
ComDev Transfers
ComDev Personnel transfer interfund (57,254)0 (4,706)(32,820)(24,434)42.67%(32,822)
ComDev Personnel Transfer of Expense 48,809 0 4,002 27,416 21,393 43.82%25,003
ComDev Operating Transfer of Expense 54,237 0 4,811 29,342 24,895 45.90%32,674
ComDev Total Transfers 45,792 0 4,106 23,938 21,854 47.72%24,855
ComDev
ComDev Interfund Cash Transfers
ComDev Transfer of Equity 0 0 0 2,275,054 (2,275,054)0.00%3,043,921
ComDev Total Interfund Cash Transfers 0 0 0 2,275,054 (2,275,054)0.00%3,043,921
ComDev
ComDev TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,596,714 (1,800)346,065 4,313,132 (718,219)(19.97)%5,014,630
Page 21 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Police 2110 - Police Department
Police REVENUES
Police Dog License Revenues 45,000 0 3,433 40,904 4,096 9.10%39,806
Police False Alarm Fees 2,000 0 2,190 17,110 (15,110)(755.48)%1,725
Police Grant Revenues 100,000 300,960 47,406 116,070 284,890 71.05%68,006
Police Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 1,696 65,676 (65,676)0.00%71,417
Police Court Revenue 400,000 0 56,218 190,950 209,050 52.26%234,282
Police Restitution 0 0 114 1,031 (1,031)0.00%199
Police Federal Drug Seizure Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%17,660
Police State Drug Seizure Revenue 0 0 3,043 6,495 (6,495)0.00%14,733
Police School Resource Revenue 297,500 0 174,219 350,338 (52,838)(17.76)%278,725
Police Recycled Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%669
Police Rental Income 3,000 0 50 2,700 300 10.00%2,650
Police Impact Rev - Multifamily 0 0 17,372 47,502 (47,502)0.00%15,201
Police Impact Rev - Commercial 20,000 0 1,563 38,913 (18,913)(94.56)%22,270
Police Impact Rev - Residential 176,436 0 14,929 97,693 78,743 44.62%96,463
Police Donations (plus project code)0 4,181 0 4,181 0 0.00%0
Police Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 542 1,726 (1,726)0.00%3,921
Police Fines, Forfeit Revenues 5,000 0 730 4,615 385 7.70%5,645
Police Sale of Assets - Gain(Loss)0 0 9,193 34,226 (34,226)0.00%33,838
Police Total REVENUES 1,048,936 305,141 332,697 1,020,131 333,946 24.66%907,208
Police
Police PERSONNEL COSTS
Police Wages 8,863,618 79,954 722,278 4,794,616 4,148,956 46.39%4,570,635
Police K-9 Wages 35,002 0 2,316 18,042 16,960 48.45%19,757
Police Wages - Seasonal/Parttime 18,103 0 1,579 9,828 8,275 45.70%10,243
Police Overtime Wages 511,350 57,709 54,944 375,306 193,753 34.04%311,877
Police Uniform Allowance 123,900 0 0 103,450 20,450 16.50%105,000
Police FICA (7.65%)730,725 9,001 58,361 391,694 348,032 47.04%369,518
Police PERSI 1,092,465 13,319 90,297 600,538 505,246 45.69%566,576
Police Workers' Comp 325,673 2,765 0 47,084 281,354 85.66%42,611
Police Employee Insurance 1,860,201 0 135,113 924,366 935,835 50.30%907,187
Police Unemployment 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%1,852
Page 22 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Police Total PERSONNEL COSTS 13,561,037 162,748 1,064,888 7,264,923 6,458,862 47.06%6,905,256
Police
Police OPERATING COSTS
Police Office Expense 10,421 21,809 1,279 19,178 13,052 40.49%19,643
Police Copier Expense 18,352 0 1,635 10,504 7,848 42.76%7,721
Police Employee Coffee & Misc 8,590 0 1,158 5,308 3,282 38.21%3,901
Police Janitorial 80,295 0 4,523 31,658 48,637 60.57%32,340
Police Safety Expense 3,500 200 410 1,223 2,477 66.95%142
Police Shop Supplies 4,000 0 0 788 3,212 80.29%2,701
Police Fuels - Gas 266,000 4,000 12,103 69,679 200,321 74.19%67,087
Police Clothing Expense 59,600 4,000 4,623 50,318 13,282 20.88%22,684
Police Medical Supplies 2,250 0 0 2,730 (480)(21.33)%1,249
Police Data Access Expense 1,800 0 0 0 1,800 100.00%750
Police Investigation Expenses 11,000 0 110 2,884 8,116 73.78%3,372
Police K-9 Expenses 6,000 0 394 4,406 1,594 26.56%2,939
Police Community Events Expenses 9,900 5,122 1,000 6,089 8,933 59.46%954
Police Building Maintenance 86,749 0 5,391 41,403 45,346 52.27%25,693
Police Parking/Asphalt Maintenance 6,000 0 0 0 6,000 100.00%0
Police Vehicle Repair 61,250 1,000 8,399 37,409 24,841 39.90%19,135
Police Vehicle Maintenance 88,950 1,050 4,664 32,760 57,240 63.59%28,155
Police Equipment Maintenance & Repair 500 0 80 265 235 47.00%256
Police Software Maintenance 158,590 0 1,640 115,100 43,490 27.42%104,559
Police Alarm Service/Sprinkler System 3,000 0 112 4,277 (1,277)(42.57)%4,677
Police Misc Contributions 0 2,500 0 0 2,500 100.00%0
Police Equipment & Supplies 56,340 1,860 1,998 39,413 18,787 32.28%60,997
Police Ammunition & Firearms 81,990 5,200 335 74,097 13,093 15.01%63,926
Police SWAT Equipment 6,000 0 781 3,832 2,168 36.13%3,421
Police Electronics Expense (under $5000)42,137 0 254 9,668 32,469 77.05%10,907
Police Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)5,500 0 0 4,044 1,456 26.47%2,418
Police Furniture & Furnishings 9,000 2,000 680 7,620 3,380 30.72%6,575
Police Computers & Printers (IT use only)106,420 0 0 641 105,780 99.39%24,683
Police Professional Services 23,502 25,200 0 28,207 20,495 42.08%17,911
Police Contracted Labor 0 0 1,257 7,747 (7,747)0.00%0
Page 23 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Police Legal Services - Prosecution 362,292 0 29,102 203,717 158,575 43.76%197,783
Police Background/Employment Testing 8,800 0 4,408 14,648 (5,848)(66.45)%3,061
Police Contracted Services 370,132 0 30,844 215,910 154,222 41.66%205,410
Police Telephone/Internet 14,702 0 819 4,951 9,751 66.32%5,648
Police Postage & Mailings 1,600 6,120 599 4,686 3,034 39.29%6,295
Police Pagers/Radios/Communications 26,398 13,905 1,736 16,401 23,902 59.30%11,834
Police ILETS Network 20,000 0 3,125 9,375 10,625 53.12%9,375
Police Cellphone Expense 75,000 0 10,830 36,257 38,743 51.65%33,918
Police Business Meals 2,800 100 378 1,454 1,446 49.85%1,316
Police Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 1,950 0 92 474 1,477 75.71%751
Police Employee Seminars/Training 54,450 20,518 5,105 31,072 43,896 58.55%28,289
Police Travel - Transportation 11,800 0 2,057 8,270 3,530 29.91%11,227
Police Travel - Lodging 17,700 0 3,930 16,075 1,625 9.18%20,124
Police Travel - Per Diem 11,800 0 2,413 8,215 3,585 30.38%9,424
Police City Training Classes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%153
Police Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 0 63,947 6,746 41,077 22,870 35.76%12,624
Police Legal Notices 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%79
Police Printing/Binding/Engraving 7,500 10,233 1,549 9,278 8,455 47.68%5,087
Police Insurance Premium/Claims 123,216 0 2,220 115,379 7,837 6.36%115,865
Police Electricity - Idaho Power 59,102 0 2,734 22,247 36,855 62.35%21,477
Police Intermountain Gas 21,333 0 784 9,652 11,681 54.75%9,429
Police Sanitary Services 300 0 0 144 156 51.90%0
Police Equipment Rental & Lease 625 0 0 304 321 51.42%304
Police Dues,Licenses,Publications 13,455 325 425 4,178 9,602 69.68%5,337
Police Irrigation Taxes 1,700 0 0 2,608 (908)(53.40)%2,549
Police Holiday Expense 1,995 0 0 0 1,995 100.00%309
Police Property Abatement 5,000 0 0 235 4,765 95.30%2,820
Police Moving Expenses 0 0 0 250 (250)0.00%0
Police Bank & Merchant Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0
Police Drug Seizure Enforcemnt Exp 18,000 0 1,461 10,363 7,637 42.42%5,591
Police Total OPERATING COSTS 2,449,287 189,089 164,184 1,398,468 1,239,908 47.00%1,264,875
Page 24 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Police
Police Capital Outlay
Police Building Improvements 44,200 (7,775)0 1,620 34,805 95.55%0
Police Capital - Vehicles 879,300 (7,260)4,454 748,141 123,899 14.20%292,665
Police Capital - Equipment 10,500 0 0 10,375 125 1.19%0
Police Capital - K-9 & Equipment 16,000 0 0 0 16,000 100.00%7,500
Police Public Safety Training Ctr 101,113 (20,825)0 0 80,287 100.00%23,149
Police Total Capital Outlay 1,051,113 (35,860)4,454 760,136 255,116 25.13%323,314
Police
Police DEPT EXPENDITURES 17,061,437 315,977 1,233,526 9,423,527 7,953,886 45.77%8,493,446
Police
Police TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,061,437 315,977 1,233,526 9,423,527 7,953,886 45.77%8,493,446
Page 25 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Fire 2210 - Fire Department
Fire REVENUES
Fire Fire Inspection & Permit Fees 0 0 1,992 6,266 (6,266)0.00%8,035
Fire Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 3,557 12,875 (12,875)0.00%10,603
Fire Restitution 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%12
Fire Rural Fire & Misc Revenue 1,160,110 0 84,208 547,113 612,997 52.83%677,678
Fire Impact Rev - Multifamily 0 0 70,537 192,875 (192,875)0.00%61,720
Fire Impact Rev - Commercial 60,000 0 6,474 161,210 (101,210)(168.68)%92,269
Fire Impact Rev - Residential 500,000 0 60,618 396,770 103,230 20.64%391,608
Fire Donations (plus project code)0 0 90 8,360 (8,360)0.00%8,537
Fire Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 761 (761)0.00%5
Fire Sale of Assets - Gain(Loss)0 0 0 29,997 (29,997)0.00%11,997
Fire Total REVENUES 1,720,110 0 227,475 1,356,226 363,884 21.15%1,262,464
Fire
Fire PERSONNEL COSTS
Fire Wages 5,945,558 (55,428)493,393 3,323,547 2,566,582 43.57%3,110,276
Fire Wages - Seasonal/Parttime 15,800 0 1,803 9,795 6,005 38.00%0
Fire Overtime Wages 339,804 55,428 45,222 336,301 58,932 14.91%259,283
Fire FICA (7.65%)482,038 0 39,656 269,434 212,604 44.10%247,618
Fire PERSI 731,661 0 62,700 426,243 305,418 41.74%391,038
Fire Workers' Comp 272,381 0 0 41,359 231,022 84.81%39,223
Fire Employee Insurance 1,079,200 0 85,431 610,892 468,308 43.39%576,595
Fire Total PERSONNEL COSTS 8,866,442 0 728,205 5,017,571 3,848,871 43.41%4,624,032
Fire
Fire OPERATING COSTS
Fire Office Expense 7,950 0 477 2,810 5,140 64.64%3,988
Fire Copier Expense 7,351 0 604 3,897 3,454 46.98%3,754
Fire Employee Coffee & Misc 4,920 0 774 2,587 2,333 47.41%2,297
Fire Janitorial 12,030 0 922 5,794 6,236 51.83%6,330
Fire Safety Expense 200 0 0 0 200 100.00%132
Fire Shop Supplies 5,200 0 867 2,669 2,531 48.67%3,392
Fire Dispatch Service 96,000 0 21,667 65,002 30,998 32.28%61,918
Fire Fuels - Gas 95,650 0 5,470 29,677 65,973 68.97%25,272
Page 26 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Fire Fuels - Diesel/Propane 2,250 0 0 283 1,967 87.40%0
Fire Clothing Expense 63,500 0 2,689 47,725 15,775 24.84%22,331
Fire SCBA/Bottles/Co Tester 20,600 0 912 4,634 15,966 77.50%3,485
Fire Medical Supplies 15,000 0 3,742 13,820 1,180 7.86%8,919
Fire JPA Medical Svc & Supplies 31,250 0 0 21,250 10,000 32.00%0
Fire Community Events Expenses 1,500 0 0 550 950 63.36%21
Fire Building Maintenance 88,786 0 11,433 53,532 35,254 39.70%34,202
Fire Parking/Asphalt Maintenance 44,020 (29,520)460 460 14,040 96.82%0
Fire Vehicle Repair 58,300 0 10,955 59,593 (1,293)(2.21)%47,315
Fire Vehicle Maintenance 67,980 0 1,805 34,306 33,675 49.53%38,288
Fire Equipment Maintenance & Repair 28,175 0 7,070 13,570 14,605 51.83%5,089
Fire Grounds Maintenance 625 0 0 0 625 100.00%0
Fire Software Maintenance 52,680 0 290 22,983 29,697 56.37%15,565
Fire Alarm Service/Sprinkler System 7,882 0 1,623 6,060 1,822 23.12%6,319
Fire Flag/Banner Expense 1,050 0 0 0 1,050 100.00%254
Fire Equipment & Supplies 93,350 0 8,126 24,019 69,331 74.26%68,600
Fire Turnout Equipment 93,549 0 7,649 31,207 62,342 66.64%11,539
Fire Electronics Expense (under $5000)12,150 0 80 2,151 9,999 82.29%8,397
Fire Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)0 0 0 299 (299)0.00%0
Fire Furniture & Furnishings 11,890 0 192 9,638 2,251 18.93%11,963
Fire Computers & Printers (IT use only)17,000 0 0 223 16,777 98.68%3,894
Fire Professional Services 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 100.00%27,940
Fire Contracted Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%2,217
Fire Preventative Health Exp 35,110 0 0 16,180 18,930 53.91%12,535
Fire Background/Employment Testing 7,800 0 0 2,289 5,511 70.65%510
Fire Telephone/Internet 7,568 0 777 2,776 4,792 63.31%2,809
Fire Postage & Mailings 1,700 0 463 1,094 606 35.62%899
Fire Pagers/Radios/Communications 33,470 (16,000)9,573 11,922 5,548 31.75%2,991
Fire Cellphone Expense 9,763 0 1,513 5,228 4,535 46.45%4,858
Fire Business Meals 1,900 0 385 573 1,328 69.86%370
Fire Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 100 0 0 10 90 89.99%1
Fire Employee Seminars/Training 36,092 0 4,987 22,911 13,181 36.51%12,208
Fire Travel - Transportation 20,264 0 3,770 8,847 11,417 56.34%2,811
Page 27 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Fire Travel - Lodging 28,478 0 4,934 12,188 16,290 57.20%4,355
Fire Travel - Per Diem 17,566 0 3,764 7,954 9,612 54.71%4,103
Fire City Training Classes 6,969 0 132 1,244 5,725 82.14%1,849
Fire Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 7,000 0 47 47 6,953 99.32%299
Fire Legal Notices 0 0 0 74 (74)0.00%0
Fire Printing/Binding/Engraving 3,060 0 0 1,081 1,979 64.68%1,195
Fire Insurance Premium/Claims 86,584 0 0 76,184 10,400 12.01%74,690
Fire Electricity - Idaho Power 33,500 0 4,045 15,037 18,463 55.11%14,244
Fire Intermountain Gas 22,700 0 1,074 13,940 8,760 38.59%13,701
Fire Sanitary Services 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%78
Fire Equipment Rental & Lease 400 0 255 545 (145)(36.18)%133
Fire Dues,Licenses,Publications 29,827 0 963 11,449 18,378 61.61%14,277
Fire Irrigation Taxes 1,300 0 0 871 430 33.03%922
Fire Holiday Expense 1,200 0 0 1,200 0 0.00%1,125
Fire Bank & Merchant Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0
Fire
Fire Total OPERATING COSTS 1,343,190 (45,520)124,488 672,385 625,284 48.19%594,380
Fire
Fire Capital Outlay
Fire Capital - Vehicles 118,520 0 16,959 111,063 7,457 6.29%56,108
Fire Capital - Fire Trucks 1,053,829 (1,053,829)0 0 0 0.00%519,536
Fire Capital - Software 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 100.00%0
Fire Capital - Equipment 131,000 0 0 62 130,938 99.95%0
Fire Capital - Communication Equipment 0 16,000 0 14,197 1,803 11.27%0
Fire Total Capital Outlay 1,343,349 (1,037,829)16,959 125,322 180,198 58.98%575,644
Fire
Fire DEPT EXPENDITURES 11,552,981 (1,083,349)869,652 5,815,278 4,654,353 44.45%5,794,057
Fire
Fire Transfers
Fire Personnel Transfer of Expense 20,250 0 1,669 11,288 8,962 44.25%11,053
Fire Operating Transfer of Expense 54,573 0 4,840 29,524 25,049 45.90%32,877
Fire Total Transfers 74,823 0 6,509 40,811 34,012 45.46%43,930
Fire
Fire TOTAL EXPENDITURES 11,627,804 (1,083,349)876,161 5,856,089 4,688,365 44.46%5,484,000
Page 28 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Parks 2250 - Parks & Recreation
Parks REVENUES
Parks Grant Revenue - Capital 0 75,395 0 10,745 64,650 85.74%0
Parks Reimbursement Revenues 30,000 0 11,230 20,129 9,871 32.90%25,795
Parks Restitution 0 0 0 20 (20)0.00%139
Parks Recycled Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%384
Parks Rental Income 104,000 0 9,474 66,967 37,033 35.60%6,650
Parks Park Reservations Fee Revenue 110,000 0 25,098 66,544 43,456 39.50%63,180
Parks Recreation Class Revenues 200,000 0 39,437 98,275 101,725 50.86%78,521
Parks Community Event Rev/Sponsorship 30,000 10,000 12,570 30,046 9,954 24.88%14,404
Parks Sports Revenue 216,000 0 12,667 219,297 (3,297)(1.52)%143,769
Parks Impact Rev - Multifamily 0 0 98,243 268,632 (268,632)0.00%85,962
Parks Impact Rev - Residential 1,038,000 0 118,879 778,118 259,882 25.03%767,311
Parks Contract Service Revenues 8,000 0 260 1,151 6,849 85.61%812
Parks Donations (plus project code)0 0 0 300 (300)0.00%1,689
Parks Cash Donation for Capital Outlay 0 425,000 0 23,388 401,613 94.49%0
Parks Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 304 (304)0.00%327
Parks Interest Earnings 15,000 0 27,461 72,267 (57,267)(381.77)%43,863
Parks Sale of Assets - Gain(Loss)0 0 0 (2,480)2,480 0.00%11,445
Parks Total REVENUES 1,751,000 510,395 355,319 1,653,702 607,693 26.87%1,244,251
Parks
Parks PERSONNEL COSTS
Parks Wages 1,351,415 (4,452)112,140 728,392 618,571 45.92%614,694
Parks Wages - Seasonal/Parttime 449,656 0 31,398 105,973 343,683 76.43%102,544
Parks Overtime Wages 20,245 0 1,806 26,123 (5,878)(29.03)%11,400
Parks Uniform Allowance 445 (445)0 0 0 0.00%0
Parks FICA (7.65%)130,292 0 10,650 62,781 67,511 51.81%53,144
Parks PERSI 145,060 0 12,820 84,985 60,075 41.41%72,096
Parks Workers' Comp 53,521 0 0 8,056 45,465 84.94%6,362
Parks Employee Insurance 569,908 0 36,707 223,603 346,305 60.76%199,803
Parks Unemployment 0 0 0 5,095 (5,095)0.00%8,029
Parks Total PERSONNEL COSTS 2,720,542 (4,897)205,521 1,245,007 1,470,638 54.15%1,068,073
Parks
Page 29 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Parks OPERATING COSTS
Parks Office Expense 5,446 0 293 2,990 2,456 45.10%3,952
Parks Copier Expense 11,952 0 707 3,752 8,200 68.60%2,908
Parks Spraying/Fertilizer 71,766 0 975 1,380 70,386 98.07%20,614
Parks Employee Coffee & Misc 3,622 60 78 1,134 2,548 69.20%789
Parks Janitorial 47,164 (9,000)2,925 21,131 17,033 44.63%5,178
Parks Restroom Supplies 22,527 0 4,994 20,085 2,442 10.84%12,856
Parks Safety Expense 2,845 0 211 2,337 508 17.84%2,065
Parks Shop Supplies 7,912 0 643 4,349 3,563 45.02%4,382
Parks Fuels - Gas 64,123 0 3,421 18,433 45,690 71.25%14,217
Parks Clothing Expense 6,720 445 0 4,642 2,523 35.21%4,009
Parks Medical Supplies 1,435 0 71 104 1,331 92.74%85
Parks Recreation Class Expense 16,600 0 0 352 16,248 97.87%633
Parks Recreation Sports Expenses 125,000 0 8,282 69,784 55,216 44.17%62,682
Parks Community Events Expenses 42,000 0 937 2,819 39,181 93.28%2,675
Parks Building Maintenance 91,791 0 6,146 46,540 45,251 49.29%31,779
Parks Parking/Asphalt Maintenance 34,556 0 175 3,691 30,865 89.31%11,391
Parks Vehicle Repair 15,000 0 1,092 6,186 8,815 58.76%16,160
Parks Vehicle Maintenance 15,000 0 332 4,582 10,419 69.45%8,091
Parks Equipment Maintenance & Repair 33,601 0 4,187 29,725 3,876 11.53%14,869
Parks Forestry Expense 44,536 0 9,485 20,571 23,965 53.81%16,394
Parks Downtown Tree Maintenance 75,000 0 0 8,078 66,922 89.22%65
Parks Grounds Maintenance 167,861 12,000 37,623 102,390 77,471 43.07%107,251
Parks Vandalism Cleanup Exp 2,063 0 0 0 2,063 100.00%4,843
Parks Turf Rehab 15,699 0 4,546 6,494 9,205 58.63%509
Parks Surface Well Maint 13,826 0 173 8,835 4,990 36.09%14,858
Parks Software Maintenance 3,753 0 0 1,689 2,064 55.00%1,661
Parks Alarm Service/Sprinkler System 1,000 0 0 1,579 (579)(57.93)%0
Parks Misc Contributions 3,000 0 0 2,253 747 24.90%2,631
Parks Transportation Services 9,000 0 0 9,000 0 0.00%0
Parks Flag/Banner Expense 9,257 0 0 1,656 7,601 82.10%749
Parks Equipment & Supplies 43,783 (7,000)7,435 32,305 4,478 12.17%17,993
Parks Electronics Expense (under $5000)12,908 0 262 11,391 1,517 11.74%10,199
Page 30 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Parks Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)12,946 0 0 618 12,328 95.22%0
Parks Furniture & Furnishings 3,082 0 291 1,218 1,864 60.48%7,584
Parks Computers & Printers (IT use only)5,800 1,950 0 287 7,463 96.29%8,475
Parks Professional Services 58,342 (407)736 21,914 36,021 62.17%27,475
Parks Investment Services 0 0 188 1,320 (1,320)0.00%1,311
Parks Contracted Labor 297,963 0 26,045 136,718 161,245 54.11%134,669
Parks Background/Employment Testing 2,100 0 19 111 1,989 94.71%148
Parks Telephone/Internet 8,465 0 667 3,097 5,369 63.42%3,275
Parks Postage & Mailings 1,000 0 30 867 133 13.30%569
Parks Pagers/Radios/Communications 1,278 520 81 618 1,180 65.61%378
Parks Cellphone Expense 19,778 400 2,729 13,515 6,663 33.01%6,781
Parks Business Meals 300 0 30 70 230 76.65%0
Parks Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 0 0 0 116 (116)0.00%9
Parks Employee Seminars/Training 16,120 206 445 7,685 8,641 52.92%4,703
Parks Travel - Transportation 6,099 258 0 2,870 3,487 54.84%800
Parks Travel - Lodging 9,369 670 0 3,764 6,275 62.50%1,952
Parks Travel - Per Diem 4,536 363 0 2,256 2,643 53.94%854
Parks City Training Classes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%153
Parks Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 9,000 0 168 1,264 7,736 85.95%410
Parks Legal Notices 500 0 0 338 162 32.47%295
Parks Printing/Binding/Engraving 27,150 0 2,309 10,030 17,120 63.05%5,701
Parks Insurance Premium/Claims 18,316 0 288 21,416 (3,100)(16.92)%15,800
Parks Electricity - Idaho Power 151,926 0 11,778 69,495 82,431 54.25%66,397
Parks Intermountain Gas 23,787 0 854 10,145 13,642 57.35%5,927
Parks Equipment Rental & Lease 40,613 0 3,843 30,457 10,156 25.00%10,842
Parks Dues,Licenses,Publications 9,681 0 225 6,633 3,048 31.48%6,430
Parks Commission Expense 1,000 0 19 473 527 52.66%281
Parks Irrigation Taxes 41,100 0 141 44,660 (3,560)(8.66)%43,336
Parks Holiday Expense 35,480 15 6 30,564 4,931 13.89%20,246
Parks Volunteer Appreciation expense 2,500 0 13 354 2,146 85.82%0
Parks Bank & Merchant Charges 27,000 0 1,804 13,992 13,008 48.17%13,149
Parks Suspense (no receipts)0 0 0 1,909 (1,909)0.00%0
Parks Total OPERATING COSTS 1,855,977 480 147,703 889,029 967,427 52.11%784,437
Page 31 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Parks
Parks Capital Outlay
Parks Cap Outlay - Bldgs & Struct 4,004,900 (3,370,719)0 0 634,181 100.00%0
Parks Building Improvements 105,000 0 0 42,542 62,458 59.48%0
Parks Pathway development 569,577 (26,191)12,923 49,528 493,858 90.88%39,007
Parks Improvements @ Tully Park 21,039 12,961 0 34,000 0 0.00%0
Parks Improvements @ Storey Park 130,861 74,665 160 12,401 193,125 93.96%13,952
Parks Streetscape irrigation landscaping 146,748 (1,335)0 69,791 75,622 52.00%3,345
Parks Borup Property construction 71,859 0 0 160 71,699 99.77%3,141
Parks Capital - Vehicles 58,500 0 0 53,137 5,364 9.16%0
Parks Capital - Equipment 92,500 10,000 68,048 86,117 16,383 15.98%157,787
Parks Capital - Lawnmower 38,698 (19,698)0 16,886 2,114 11.12%78,802
Parks Capital - Communication Equipment 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 100.00%0
Parks Adventure Island Equipment@56acres 14,048 0 0 0 14,048 100.00%183,914
Parks Bear Creek Development 32,000 0 0 0 32,000 100.00%0
Parks Keith Bird Legacy Park construction 637,295 963,498 6,809 233,516 1,367,277 85.41%18,245
Parks Kleiner Memorial Park 36,219 (1,679)0 15,429 19,111 55.32%1,126
Parks 77 acre South Park 735,222 (38,592)12,857 38,321 658,308 94.49%119
Parks Reta Huskey Park 1,461,010 88,439 2,399 145,911 1,403,538 90.58%5,074
Parks Hillsdale Park Construction 1,459,924 270,337 12,116 213,096 1,517,164 87.68%658
Parks Total Capital Outlay 9,665,401 (2,038,314)115,311 1,010,836 6,616,251 86.75%505,168
Parks
Parks DEPT EXPENDITURES 14,241,919 (2,042,731)468,534 3,144,872 9,054,316 74.22%2,357,678
Parks
Parks Transfers
Parks Personnel Transfer of Expense 13,115 0 1,081 7,311 5,804 44.25%7,159
Parks Operating Transfer of Expense 35,346 0 3,135 19,122 16,224 45.90%21,294
Parks Total Transfers 48,461 0 4,216 26,433 22,028 45.46%28,453
Parks
Parks TOTAL EXPENDITURES 14,290,380 (2,042,731)472,750 3,171,305 9,076,344 74.10%2,386,130
Page 32 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
PW 3200 - Public Works
PW REVENUES
PW Review Fees 150,000 0 56,104 284,813 (134,813)(89.87)%247,541
PW QLPE Review Revenue 50,000 0 6,760 38,220 11,780 23.56%26,780
PW Filing Fees - Revenues 50,000 0 7,855 41,571 8,429 16.85%37,096
PW Dept Svc Fees 0 0 25 1,290 (1,290)0.00%2,917
PW Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 0 5,030 (5,030)0.00%0
PW Donations (plus project code)0 0 4,980 5,860 (5,860)0.00%6,525
PW Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%2,700
PW Sale of Assets - Gain(Loss)0 0 0 3,647 (3,647)0.00%7,193
PW Total REVENUES 250,000 0 75,724 380,431 (130,431)(52.17)%330,752
PW
PW PERSONNEL COSTS
PW Wages 2,480,073 0 170,184 1,228,501 1,251,572 50.46%1,152,935
PW Wages - Seasonal/Parttime 0 0 0 9,319 (9,319)0.00%0
PW Overtime Wages 17,143 0 204 5,836 11,307 65.95%2,026
PW FICA (7.65%)189,832 0 12,536 91,595 98,237 51.74%85,296
PW PERSI 280,701 0 19,288 140,289 140,412 50.02%129,977
PW Workers' Comp 76,839 0 0 10,734 66,105 86.03%9,327
PW Employee Insurance 579,375 0 31,453 234,313 345,062 59.55%224,517
PW Unemployment 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%16,655
PW Total PERSONNEL COSTS 3,623,963 0 233,665 1,720,587 1,903,376 52.52%1,620,732
PW
PW OPERATING COSTS
PW Office Expense 13,479 0 884 4,346 9,133 67.75%3,677
PW Copier Expense 8,367 0 726 4,795 3,572 42.69%5,243
PW Employee Coffee & Misc 2,460 0 87 666 1,794 72.92%517
PW Safety Expense 4,014 0 309 1,446 2,568 63.98%1,917
PW Fuels - Gas 10,800 0 805 4,259 6,542 60.56%3,755
PW Clothing Expense 3,950 0 76 773 3,177 80.42%1,268
PW Community Events Expenses 5,000 0 1,498 1,606 3,394 67.87%165
PW Vehicle Repair 4,700 0 222 239 4,461 94.92%1,166
PW Vehicle Maintenance 4,700 0 50 2,176 2,524 53.70%2,901
Page 33 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
PW Software Maintenance 44,483 0 3,553 35,368 9,115 20.49%27,150
PW Equipment & Supplies 5,000 0 0 421 4,579 91.58%238
PW Electronics Expense (under $5000)5,500 0 24 661 4,839 87.97%3,200
PW Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)0 0 0 164 (164)0.00%299
PW Furniture & Furnishings 21,500 0 0 15,999 5,501 25.58%3,924
PW Computers & Printers (IT use only)4,700 0 0 1,320 3,380 71.91%9,847
PW Professional Services 513,502 (193,502)4,000 31,059 288,942 90.29%34,080
PW Professional Svc - PW Wastewater 523,392 452,608 5,930 99,537 876,463 89.80%106,253
PW Professional Svc - PW Water 424,088 (99,210)11,731 82,835 242,043 74.50%49,644
PW PROFESSIONAL SVC for QLPE Reviews 50,000 0 16,380 33,020 16,980 33.96%22,880
PW Audit & Accounting Services 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%4,900
PW Contracted Labor 20,000 0 2,111 9,677 10,323 51.61%0
PW Legal Services 15,000 0 0 6,445 8,555 57.03%9,561
PW Contracted Services 1,100 0 0 0 1,100 100.00%0
PW Telephone/Internet 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%433
PW Postage & Mailings 1,850 0 21 356 1,494 80.74%194
PW Pagers/Radios/Communications 1,500 0 779 1,648 (148)(9.88)%1,067
PW Cellphone Expense 9,420 0 1,434 5,956 3,464 36.77%5,200
PW Business Meals 100 0 19 499 (399)(399.11)%306
PW Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 180 0 12 20 160 88.88%150
PW Employee Seminars/Training 85,922 0 29,766 48,165 37,758 43.94%47,107
PW Travel - Transportation 15,459 0 459 1,419 14,040 90.82%1,710
PW Travel - Lodging 11,314 0 837 2,942 8,372 73.99%4,327
PW Travel - Per Diem 8,102 0 448 2,082 6,021 74.30%1,925
PW City Training Classes 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%153
PW Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 51,100 0 747 1,841 49,259 96.39%3,316
PW Legal Notices 270 0 0 0 270 100.00%76
PW Printing/Binding/Engraving 4,520 0 46 325 4,195 92.80%1,259
PW Insurance Premium/Claims 4,772 0 0 0 4,772 100.00%1,474
PW Dues,Licenses,Publications 94,862 0 11,041 62,807 32,055 33.79%64,785
PW Holiday Expense 615 0 0 615 0 0.00%615
PW Employee Education Reimbursement 0 0 0 1,785 (1,785)0.00%0
PW Total OPERATING COSTS 1,975,723 159,895 93,997 467,270 1,668,348 78.12%426,681
Page 34 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
PW
PW Capital Outlay
PW Capital - Vehicles 64,000 0 1,876 60,753 3,247 5.07%0
PW Total Capital Outlay 64,000 0 1,876 60,753 3,247 5.07%0
PW
PW DEPT EXPENDITURES 5,663,686 159,895 329,538 2,248,610 3,574,971 61.38%2,047,413
PW
PW Transfers
PW Personnel Transfer of Expense 196,696 0 7,669 52,859 143,837 73.12%52,446
PW Operating Transfer of Expense 96,887 0 8,593 52,416 44,471 45.90%58,368
PW Total Transfers 293,583 0 16,262 105,275 188,308 64.14%110,814
PW
PW TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,957,269 159,895 345,800 2,353,885 3,763,279 61.51%2,158,228
Page 35 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
MUBS 3300 - Meridian Utility Billing
MUBS REVENUES
MUBS Dept Svc Fees 30,000 0 120 2,539 27,462 91.53%21,994
MUBS Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 0 15 (15)0.00%0
MUBS Garbage - Admin Fee Revenue 649,271 0 60,694 359,524 289,747 44.62%335,948
MUBS Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 (2)2 0.00%21
MUBS Total REVENUES 679,271 0 60,814 362,076 317,195 46.70%357,962
MUBS
MUBS PERSONNEL COSTS
MUBS Wages 281,983 0 24,839 165,744 116,239 41.22%149,480
MUBS Overtime Wages 2,804 0 101 3,043 (239)(8.52)%894
MUBS FICA (7.65%)21,786 0 1,795 12,077 9,709 44.56%10,900
MUBS PERSI 32,238 0 2,823 19,107 13,131 40.73%17,022
MUBS Workers' Comp 769 0 0 146 623 81.04%118
MUBS Employee Insurance 99,400 0 5,905 41,086 58,314 58.66%43,487
MUBS Total PERSONNEL COSTS 438,980 0 35,463 241,202 197,778 45.05%221,901
MUBS
MUBS OPERATING COSTS
MUBS Office Expense 6,000 0 390 3,100 2,900 48.33%1,776
MUBS Copier Expense 5,350 0 0 1,501 3,849 71.94%4,267
MUBS Employee Coffee & Misc 420 0 0 142 278 66.28%0
MUBS Data Access Expense 1,800 0 0 0 1,800 100.00%750
MUBS Software Maintenance 30,524 0 0 30,560 (36)(0.11)%3,413
MUBS Misc Contributions 16,050 0 784 6,364 9,686 60.34%5,608
MUBS Electronics Expense (under $5000)1,600 0 88 1,121 479 29.94%525
MUBS Furniture & Furnishings 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%0
MUBS Computers & Printers (IT use only)0 0 0 0 0 0.00%3,744
MUBS Contracted Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%14,356
MUBS Lockbox Services 22,600 0 1,369 10,596 12,004 53.11%10,565
MUBS IVR Phone Services 17,400 0 778 5,833 11,567 66.47%8,535
MUBS Postage & Mailings 250,000 0 7,728 129,203 120,797 48.31%140,083
MUBS Employee Seminars/Training 3,650 0 0 0 3,650 100.00%0
MUBS Travel - Transportation 1,125 0 0 581 544 48.34%0
Page 36 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
MUBS Travel - Lodging 1,125 0 0 710 415 36.92%0
MUBS Travel - Per Diem 750 0 0 672 78 10.40%0
MUBS Printing/Binding/Engraving 10,000 0 0 8,125 1,875 18.74%9,924
MUBS Insurance Premium/Claims 180 0 0 50 130 72.22%100
MUBS Holiday Expense 105 0 0 104 1 1.06%98
MUBS Bank & Merchant Charges 170,000 0 16,497 98,294 71,706 42.18%89,900
MUBS A/R Writeoffs & Loss 20,000 0 19,105 41,652 (21,652)(108.25)%12,898
MUBS Total OPERATING COSTS 559,179 0 46,739 338,607 220,572 39.45%306,542
MUBS
MUBS Capital Outlay
MUBS Capital - Software 226,653 (148,393)2,400 31,687 46,573 59.51%183,718
MUBS Total Capital Outlay 226,653 (148,393)2,400 31,687 46,573 59.51%183,718
MUBS
MUBS DEPT EXPENDITURES 1,224,812 (148,393)84,602 611,496 464,923 43.19%712,162
MUBS
MUBS
MUBS TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,224,812 (148,393)84,602 611,496 464,923 43.19%712,162
Page 37 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Water 3400 - Water Department
Water REVENUES
Water Dept Svc Fees 250,000 0 28,818 151,897 98,103 39.24%145,226
Water Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 263 273 (273)0.00%2,974
Water Restitution 0 0 0 290 (290)0.00%0
Water Recycled Revenue 0 0 76 1,629 (1,629)0.00%2,451
Water Rental Income 20,000 0 7,355 44,238 (24,238)(121.19)%31,348
Water Water/Sewer Sales Revenue 8,055,445 0 551,188 3,906,923 4,148,522 51.49%3,879,405
Water Meter/Equip Sales Revenues 200,000 0 45,511 233,462 (33,462)(16.73)%202,170
Water Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%1,814
Water Total REVENUES 8,525,445 0 633,210 4,338,711 4,186,734 49.11%4,265,388
Water
Water PERSONNEL COSTS
Water Wages 1,172,049 0 100,938 620,731 551,318 47.03%570,700
Water Overtime Wages 31,278 0 4,160 24,660 6,618 21.15%17,864
Water FICA (7.65%)92,055 0 7,548 46,268 45,787 49.73%42,604
Water PERSI 136,217 0 11,897 72,525 63,692 46.75%66,314
Water Workers' Comp 40,962 0 0 5,870 35,092 85.67%5,459
Water Employee Insurance 355,000 0 30,481 190,166 164,834 46.43%162,833
Water Total PERSONNEL COSTS 1,827,561 0 155,024 960,219 867,342 47.46%865,774
Water
Water OPERATING COSTS
Water Office Expense 7,500 0 106 5,377 2,123 28.30%6,818
Water Copier Expense 6,526 0 1,126 2,644 3,882 59.47%2,159
Water Employee Coffee & Misc 1,500 0 73 524 976 65.07%891
Water Chemicals 85,000 0 4,074 28,790 56,210 66.12%27,303
Water Janitorial 15,694 0 348 2,532 13,162 83.86%2,433
Water Safety Expense 10,150 0 1,353 8,552 1,598 15.74%4,814
Water Shop Supplies 7,000 0 238 4,011 2,989 42.69%2,143
Water Fuels - Gas 45,425 0 2,852 13,321 32,104 70.67%12,240
Water Fuels - Diesel/Propane 3,000 0 0 2,758 242 8.05%1,414
Water Clothing Expense 4,400 0 0 5,994 (1,594)(36.21)%2,176
Water Medical Supplies 300 0 0 0 300 100.00%16
Page 38 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Water Water Meters 516,500 0 11,389 56,887 459,613 88.98%288,283
Water Building Maintenance 26,595 0 400 14,467 12,128 45.60%18,942
Water Vehicle Repair 10,850 0 80 2,376 8,474 78.09%3,828
Water Vehicle Maintenance 10,850 0 1,550 9,411 1,439 13.26%28,860
Water Equipment Maintenance & Repair 6,035 0 26 1,005 5,030 83.34%2,076
Water Rolling Stock Repair 2,500 0 0 827 1,673 66.93%0
Water Rolling Stock Maintenance 2,500 0 0 0 2,500 100.00%1,059
Water Grounds Maintenance 3,500 0 2,307 2,307 1,193 34.09%2,125
Water Line Wat/Sew Maintenance 20,000 0 2,287 6,568 13,432 67.15%37,633
Water Line Wat/Sew Repair 180,000 0 14,636 51,677 128,323 71.29%17,333
Water Software Maintenance 44,094 0 194 23,913 20,181 45.76%37,532
Water Alarm Service/Sprinkler System 3,704 0 110 1,654 2,050 55.34%1,071
Water Flag/Banner Expense 100 0 0 0 100 100.00%0
Water Equipment & Supplies 80,400 0 11,429 33,910 46,490 57.82%12,984
Water Well Maintenance & Repair 144,000 20,000 20,924 85,453 78,547 47.89%87,348
Water Electronics Expense (under $5000)5,000 0 0 1,970 3,030 60.60%2,295
Water Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)0 0 0 0 0 0.00%10,555
Water Furniture & Furnishings 2,000 0 0 1,308 692 34.60%10,020
Water Computers & Printers (IT use only)13,030 0 0 0 13,030 100.00%7,858
Water Professional Services 146,704 (60,704)0 9,151 76,849 89.35%37,145
Water Contracted Labor 14,800 0 2,473 9,150 5,650 38.17%10,191
Water Water Testing 131,230 0 20,701 61,662 69,569 53.01%28,857
Water DEQ Water Assessment 97,936 0 0 97,134 802 0.81%94,414
Water Well Assessment / Abandonment 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 100.00%88,127
Water Telephone/Internet 3,600 0 597 2,136 1,464 40.67%2,150
Water Postage & Mailings 10,372 0 0 916 9,456 91.17%1,780
Water Pagers/Radios/Communications 9,893 0 2,009 6,133 3,760 38.00%4,422
Water Cellphone Expense 12,020 0 2,083 6,945 5,075 42.21%6,013
Water Business Meals 300 0 73 144 156 52.04%140
Water Mileage & Parking Reimbursement 100 0 0 0 100 100.00%0
Water Employee Seminars/Training 12,110 0 1,760 6,212 5,897 48.69%4,340
Water Travel - Transportation 3,759 0 1,112 1,172 2,587 68.81%661
Water Travel - Lodging 3,759 0 1,298 1,475 2,284 60.75%894
Page 39 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Water Travel - Per Diem 2,099 0 576 704 1,396 66.48%321
Water Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 7,800 24,049 0 24,823 7,025 22.05%4,466
Water Legal Notices 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%58
Water Printing/Binding/Engraving 10,050 0 767 1,557 8,493 84.50%5,562
Water Insurance Premium/Claims 36,632 0 0 32,232 4,400 12.01%31,819
Water Electricity - Idaho Power 409,000 0 25,990 166,076 242,924 59.39%190,993
Water Intermountain Gas 10,000 0 624 6,467 3,533 35.33%8,628
Water Sanitary Services 1,500 0 0 96 1,404 93.57%672
Water Equipment Rental & Lease 5,000 0 6,171 18,869 (13,869)(277.38)%20,120
Water Dues,Licenses,Publications 7,907 0 147 5,182 2,725 34.45%4,762
Water Irrigation Taxes 4,000 0 0 3,635 365 9.13%3,660
Water Holiday Expense 375 0 0 375 0 0.00%310
Water Total OPERATING COSTS 2,249,100 (16,656)141,882 830,484 1,401,960 62.80%1,182,716
Water
Water Capital Outlay
Water
Water Capital - Vehicles 366,805 (191,805)56,278 175,388 (388)(0.22)%53,667
Water Capital - Electronics 0 123,615 0 68,516 55,099 44.57%179,660
Water Capital - Software 93,570 0 0 0 93,570 100.00%0
Water Capital - Computers & Printers 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 100.00%0
Water Capital - Equipment 120,000 0 109,850 119,278 722 0.60%0
Water Total Capital Outlay 590,375 (68,190)166,128 363,183 159,003 30.45%233,327
Water
Water DEPT EXPENDITURES 4,667,035 (84,845)463,034 2,153,885 2,428,305 52.99%2,281,817
Water
Water Transfers
Water Personnel Transfer of Expense 891,816 0 71,866 495,174 396,642 44.47%486,933
Water Operating Transfer of Expense 194,895 0 5,818 92,535 102,359 52.52%89,821
Water Total Transfers 1,086,710 0 77,684 587,709 499,001 45.92%576,754
Water
Water TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,753,745 (84,845)540,718 2,741,595 2,927,305 51.63%2,858,570
Page 40 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
Water 3490 - Water Construction
Water REVENUES
Water Assessments - Residential Revenue 1,980,000 0 205,192 1,390,607 589,393 29.76%1,221,714
Water Assessments - Commercial Revenue 300,000 0 10,359 252,600 47,400 15.79%201,071
Water Assessments - Multifamily Revenue 100,000 0 252,544 536,572 (436,572)(436.57)%60,278
Water Interest Earnings 150,000 0 39,586 113,410 36,590 24.39%91,835
Water Total REVENUES 2,530,000 0 507,680 2,293,189 236,811 9.36%1,574,898
Water
Water OPERATING COSTS
Water Investment Services 18,000 0 832 5,830 12,170 67.61%5,827
Water Development Expense 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%14,828
Water Total OPERATING COSTS 18,000 0 832 5,830 12,170 67.61%20,656
Water
Water Capital Outlay
Water Capital Outlay - Land 60,000 0 0 56,365 3,635 6.05%0
Water Cap Outlay - Bldgs & Struct 21,535 0 0 0 21,535 100.00%0
Water Building Improvements 100,000 0 0 76,990 23,010 23.00%0
Water Capital - Vehicles 35,000 (35,000)0 0 0 0.00%0
Water Capital - Electronics 300,000 0 13,620 13,677 286,323 95.44%0
Water Capital - Communication Equipment 84,501 0 0 860 83,641 98.98%0
Water Service Line/Main Replacement 1,190,920 (261,399)65,012 306,643 622,878 67.01%20,093
Water Well #15 100,000 0 32,983 71,375 28,625 28.62%0
Water WELL #19 CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%207,526
Water WELL #21 CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%83,596
Water Well 29 construction 1,170,744 (270,297)6,303 43,920 856,527 95.12%44,509
Water Well #22 Construction 800,000 0 8,107 38,210 761,790 95.22%0
Water Well 14 Construction Upgrades 21,528 (21,528)0 0 0 0.00%13,064
Water Well#30 877,263 (32,894)13,586 63,574 780,795 92.47%22,763
Water WATERLINE EXTENSIONS 3,042,294 (713,464)49,395 279,864 2,048,965 87.98%35,454
Water Well #27 construction 1,147,227 (730,854)0 371,109 45,264 10.87%104,659
Water Well #32 capital 521,460 39,792 7,830 313,161 248,091 44.20%4,872
Water Total Capital Outlay 9,472,473 (2,025,645)196,836 1,635,749 5,811,080 78.03%536,535
Water
Water DEPT EXPENDITURES 9,490,473 (2,025,645)197,668 1,641,579 5,823,250 78.00%557,190
Water
Water TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9,490,473 (2,025,645)197,668 1,641,579 5,823,250 78.00%557,190
Page 41 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
WWTP 3500 - WasteWater Facility
WWTP REVENUES
WWTP Review Fees 0 0 825 8,625 (8,625)0.00%10,550
WWTP Grant Revenue - Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%(5,816)
WWTP Reimbursement Revenues 0 0 3,262 147,289 (147,289)0.00%21,038
WWTP Recycled Revenue 0 0 75 583 (583)0.00%14
WWTP Water/Sewer Sales Revenue 14,900,000 0 1,212,135 8,525,826 6,374,174 42.77%8,225,771
WWTP Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 2,849 (2,849)0.00%0
WWTP Total REVENUES 14,900,000 0 1,216,297 8,685,171 6,214,829 41.71%8,251,557
WWTP
WWTP PERSONNEL COSTS
WWTP Wages 1,764,116 0 144,966 980,457 783,659 44.42%979,155
WWTP Overtime Wages 47,749 0 4,240 35,549 12,200 25.55%27,808
WWTP FICA (7.65%)138,608 0 11,244 74,775 63,833 46.05%73,731
WWTP PERSI 205,103 0 16,890 114,831 90,272 44.01%113,925
WWTP Workers' Comp 62,264 0 0 11,019 51,245 82.30%8,631
WWTP Employee Insurance 539,600 0 34,877 254,097 285,503 52.91%260,287
WWTP Unemployment 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%1,876
WWTP Total PERSONNEL COSTS 2,757,440 0 212,218 1,470,728 1,286,712 46.66%1,465,414
WWTP
WWTP OPERATING COSTS
WWTP Office Expense 9,650 0 377 6,590 3,060 31.70%5,570
WWTP Copier Expense 19,286 0 1,089 8,240 11,046 57.27%7,219
WWTP Employee Coffee & Misc 2,280 0 111 709 1,571 68.92%768
WWTP Chemicals 400,000 0 26,277 273,604 126,396 31.59%229,889
WWTP Janitorial 22,410 0 1,318 11,951 10,459 46.67%12,484
WWTP Safety Expense 31,300 14,863 8,333 41,040 5,123 11.09%11,145
WWTP Shop Supplies 69,150 0 6,032 28,974 40,176 58.09%35,433
WWTP Fuels - Gas 16,750 0 1,864 7,391 9,359 55.87%7,391
WWTP Fuels - Diesel/Propane 38,000 0 0 7,702 30,298 79.73%10,048
WWTP Clothing Expense 6,150 0 13 3,663 2,487 40.44%4,334
WWTP Medical Supplies 1,000 0 0 203 797 79.67%130
WWTP Building Maintenance 55,000 0 4,627 25,122 29,878 54.32%23,834
Page 42 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
WWTP Plant Maintenance 300,000 74,000 23,364 186,749 187,251 50.06%68,911
WWTP Plant Repairs 150,000 0 24,714 63,978 86,022 57.34%57,083
WWTP Parking/Asphalt Maintenance 6,000 0 0 1,520 4,480 74.67%1,623
WWTP Vehicle Repair 24,600 0 1,281 22,364 2,236 9.08%12,287
WWTP Vehicle Maintenance 24,400 0 2,302 14,448 9,952 40.78%25,730
WWTP Equipment Maintenance & Repair 71,000 0 1,358 20,158 50,842 71.60%40,234
WWTP Rolling Stock Repair 10,000 0 1,689 2,495 7,505 75.04%9,005
WWTP Rolling Stock Maintenance 8,500 0 0 3,469 5,031 59.18%3,201
WWTP Grounds Maintenance 15,000 0 17 5,151 9,849 65.65%3,886
WWTP Lift Station Maint 25,000 10,000 2,093 30,421 4,579 13.08%9,057
WWTP Lift Station Repair 35,000 0 232 11,718 23,282 66.51%90,075
WWTP Line Wat/Sew Maintenance 20,300 0 1,692 6,260 14,040 69.16%24,298
WWTP Line Wat/Sew Repair 110,000 0 4,593 72,862 37,138 33.76%42,654
WWTP Software Maintenance 58,545 4,500 0 45,303 17,742 28.14%45,050
WWTP Alarm Service/Sprinkler System 2,600 0 2,723 3,044 (444)(17.08)%4,606
WWTP Flag/Banner Expense 300 0 0 0 300 100.00%0
WWTP Equipment & Supplies 196,500 20,912 7,239 74,148 143,264 65.89%110,866
WWTP Electronics Expense (under $5000)7,730 0 0 7,190 540 6.98%1,658
WWTP Software Acquisition & Licenses (under $25,000)48,600 (48,600)0 0 0 0.00%10,939
WWTP Furniture & Furnishings 500 0 0 0 500 100.00%453
WWTP Computers & Printers (IT use only)2,600 0 0 1,852 748 28.77%4,890
WWTP Professional Services 380,227 (89,127)21,902 124,340 166,760 57.28%83,116
WWTP Professional Svc - PW Wastewater 675,000 (675,000)0 0 0 0.00%0
WWTP Contracted Labor 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 100.00%1,612
WWTP Preventative Health Exp 1,200 0 0 185 1,015 84.61%1,126
WWTP Contracted Services 85,900 0 0 5,382 80,518 93.73%11,396
WWTP Telephone/Internet 7,050 0 775 2,439 4,611 65.40%3,189
WWTP Postage & Mailings 14,300 0 340 1,226 13,074 91.42%2,863
WWTP Pagers/Radios/Communications 363 0 278 481 (118)(32.57)%228
WWTP Cellphone Expense 9,600 0 1,546 5,927 3,673 38.25%5,251
WWTP Business Meals 100 0 0 106 (6)(5.94)%99
WWTP Employee Seminars/Training 27,997 0 4,989 26,649 1,348 4.81%10,480
WWTP Travel - Transportation 10,965 0 1,015 1,764 9,201 83.91%144
Page 43 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
WWTP Travel - Lodging 11,040 0 2,579 4,239 6,801 61.60%459
WWTP Travel - Per Diem 6,180 0 726 1,555 4,626 74.84%511
WWTP Advertising/Promotional/Outreach 7,000 0 467 2,726 4,274 61.05%16
WWTP Printing/Binding/Engraving 1,280 0 262 670 610 47.63%266
WWTP Insurance Premium/Claims 46,622 0 0 41,022 5,600 12.01%40,437
WWTP Electricity - Idaho Power 542,000 0 88,838 315,308 226,692 41.82%293,524
WWTP Intermountain Gas 77,500 0 8,427 59,092 18,408 23.75%52,679
WWTP Sanitary Services 145,650 0 45,736 126,025 19,625 13.47%60,061
WWTP Equipment Rental & Lease 33,746 0 59 690 33,056 97.95%9,676
WWTP Bldg & Structures Rental & Lease 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%(255)
WWTP Dues,Licenses,Publications 5,844 0 493 2,517 3,327 56.92%3,370
WWTP Irrigation Taxes 3,200 0 0 3,591 (391)(12.21)%3,154
WWTP Holiday Expense 570 0 0 582 (12)(2.10)%550
WWTP Total OPERATING COSTS 3,886,485 (688,452)301,772 1,714,834 1,483,200 46.38%1,498,700
WWTP
WWTP Capital Outlay
WWTP Cap Outlay - Bldgs & Struct 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%58,245
WWTP WWTP - Bldg improvements 11,411 (11,411)0 0 0 0.00%0
WWTP Capital - Vehicles 497,989 (35,714)0 465,492 (3,217)(0.69)%25,464
WWTP Capital - Electronics 240,945 (63,639)0 65,527 111,779 63.04%9,886
WWTP Capital - Software 13,767 (13,767)0 0 0 0.00%0
WWTP Capital - Equipment 0 0 6,116 6,116 (6,116)0.00%141,353
WWTP Total Capital Outlay 764,112 (124,531)6,116 537,136 102,446 16.02%234,948
WWTP
WWTP DEPT EXPENDITURES 7,408,037 (812,983)520,106 3,722,697 2,872,357 43.55%3,199,062
WWTP
WWTP Transfers
WWTP Personnel Transfer of Expense 891,816 0 73,167 504,065 387,750 43.47%495,333
WWTP Operating Transfer of Expense 194,895 0 5,818 92,535 102,359 52.52%89,821
WWTP Total Transfers 1,086,710 0 78,985 596,601 490,109 45.10%585,154
WWTP
WWTP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,494,747 (812,983)599,091 4,319,298 3,362,467 43.77%3,784,216
Page 44 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
WWTP 3590 - WasteWater Construction
WWTP REVENUES
WWTP Assessments - Residential Revenue 3,398,343 0 401,940 2,652,117 746,226 21.95%2,446,802
WWTP Cash Donation for Capital Outlay 0 0 0 20,431 (20,431)0.00%99,487
WWTP EPA WW Compliance Fee 1,432,215 0 121,457 841,405 590,810 41.25%802,347
WWTP Assessments - Commercial Revenue 450,000 0 23,313 504,581 (54,581)(12.12)%424,049
WWTP Assessments - Multifamily Revenue 100,000 0 467,712 1,000,493 (900,493)(900.49)%115,080
WWTP Interest Earnings 225,000 0 78,511 222,629 2,371 1.05%181,279
WWTP Total REVENUES 5,605,558 0 1,092,933 5,241,655 363,903 6.49%4,069,044
WWTP
WWTP OPERATING COSTS
WWTP Software Maintenance 4,500 (4,500)0 0 0 0.00%0
WWTP Investment Services 35,000 0 1,664 11,660 23,340 66.68%11,655
WWTP Legal Notices 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%79
WWTP Fixed Assets - Gain or Loss 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%(185,300)
WWTP Total OPERATING COSTS 39,500 (4,500)1,664 11,660 23,340 66.69%(173,566)
WWTP
WWTP Capital Outlay
WWTP Cap Outlay - Bldgs & Struct 24,896 (24,896)0 0 0 0.00%10,647
WWTP Building Improvements 275,000 (275,000)0 0 0 0.00%0
WWTP WWTP - Bldg improvements 54,915 2,785,085 0 58,342 2,781,658 97.94%113,275
WWTP Sewer Line Extensions 5,295,807 (157,533)16,290 408,071 4,730,203 92.05%692,740
WWTP Capital - Electronics 1,301,960 (683,877)23,949 216,462 401,621 64.97%108,475
WWTP Capital - Software 63,245 6,755 0 30,000 40,000 57.14%13,605
WWTP Capital - Equipment 200,735 (105,735)1,080 80,837 14,163 14.90%65,465
WWTP Service Line/Main Replacement 2,881,093 (563,738)125,028 547,843 1,769,512 76.35%170,673
WWTP Aeration Basin Construction 5,958 (5,958)0 0 0 0.00%31,626
WWTP Fermentation Projects 157,498 (157,498)0 0 0 0.00%14,505
WWTP Lift Station construction 526,004 (20,232)121,076 356,833 148,939 29.44%35,916
WWTP PreDesign of Capital Projects 12,729,893 (1,107,351)511,950 1,910,931 9,711,611 83.55%510,273
WWTP BoiseRiverOutfall 1,150,000 0 34,350 99,549 1,050,451 91.34%0
WWTP DAFT upgrade projects 66,183 (66,183)0 0 0 0.00%7,369
WWTP Centrate Basin Construction 1,662,336 (580,325)336 887,473 194,538 17.97%46,890
Page 45 of 46
City of Meridian
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
From 4/1/2017 Through 4/31/2017
Dept Revenue and Expense Description
Total Budget -
Original
Total Budget -
Revised
Current Period
Actual
Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Percent of Budget
Remaining
Prior Year
Actual
WWTP Headworks Improvements 7,901,315 (772,760)0 685,496 6,443,059 90.38%174,860
WWTP Reclaimed WasteWater Svc Lines 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%239
WWTP Ultraviolet Disinfection 1,475,267 (950,267)0 360,670 164,330 31.30%1,241,427
WWTP Total Capital Outlay 35,772,107 (2,679,515)834,060 5,642,507 27,450,085 82.95%3,237,984
WWTP
WWTP DEPT EXPENDITURES 35,811,607 (2,684,015)835,724 5,654,167 27,473,426 82.93%3,064,418
WWTP
WWTP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 35,811,607 (2,684,015)835,724 5,654,167 27,473,426 82.93%3,064,418
Page 46 of 46
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: Mav 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 6J
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Approval for Finance to Pay Vendor Payments of $1,009,249.25
MEETING NOTES
rte✓ APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund A-1 STAMP & MABEL'S LABELS Name Plates for B. Caldwell & Lt. J. Brown 20.00
01 General Fund ACROSS THE STREET PRODUCTIONS 220/Blue Card 50 hour training course for Adam
Johnston
346.50
01 General Fund AMY MERRILL instructor fee - Ballet 4/4-4/27/17 - qty 53 1,376.00
01 General Fund AUTOMATIC RAIN CO DBA HORIZON credit on switch; vbelt for Exmark 48 inch stand-on
mower
73.43
01 General Fund AUTOMATIC RAIN CO DBA HORIZON equipment nuts & bolts for shop - qty 36 52.56
01 General Fund AUTOMATIC RAIN CO DBA HORIZON Exmark clutch jumper harness kit - qty 1 26.35
01 General Fund AUTOMATIC RAIN CO DBA HORIZON PTO switch for Exmark 48 inch stand-on mower - qty 1 47.32
01 General Fund BATTERIES PLUS battery for radio for downtown trees - qty 1 17.99
01 General Fund BATTERIES PLUS Recycle Fee for Used Batteries - Qty 26 52.00
01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.220/Repair & restore power to Fire Safety Center 264.43
01 General Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 17-0122, MUBS Bills, Delinquent Notes, & Newsletter
Inserts
81.87
01 General Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XPN547404, Additional Copies 2/22/17-3/21/17 848.80
01 General Fund BOISE SOFTBALL UMPIRES ASSOC.17-0253 softball umpire services 5/8-5/12/17 - qty 52
games
1,404.52
01 General Fund BOISE SPEAKWELL Registration, B. Sherwood, Public Speaking Session,
Boise ID
1,650.00
01 General Fund BONNEVILLE BLUE PRINT SUPPLY foamcore maps of new parks - qty 48 79.44
01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Billing Error Corrected with Credit on Inv #71724 65.50
01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Corrected Invoice for Oil Change & Tires for Unit # 140 768.88
01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Credit fo Fix Billing Error on Inv # 71722 (65.50)
01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Credit for Inv# 71713 for Oil Change and Tires on Unit
# 140
(711.16)
01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Credit for Oil Change Unit # 99 (50.00)
01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change for Unit # 119 70.20
01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change Unit # 99 50.00
01 General Fund BRYANT IDEAS 'If This Property Could Talk' Printed Signs for Historic
Pre
876.00
01 General Fund CALLBACK STAFFING SOLUTIONS, LLC Support (less than 100 users) (5/01/17-6/01/17)39.99
01 General Fund CDW GOVERNMENT CradlePoint 3G/4G LTE MB Routers 7,920.00
01 General Fund CITY OF BOISE IT COMMUNICATIONS ETS Monitoring for May 2017 - Cherry, STratford,
Charter
143.67
01 General Fund CITY OF BOISE POLICE DEPARTMENT Registration, L. Sunada, LE Handgun Mastery
Instructor Devel
995.00
01 General Fund CITY OF BOISE POLICE DEPARTMENT Registration, W. Soy & TJ Cambron, Motorcycle Crash
Investig
1,000.00
01 General Fund CLIMA-TECH CORPORATION Installed Controls for New Damper for PSTC 969.00
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 1
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund COMMERCIAL TIRE C-14304 Taurus maintenance-brake/steering flush &
Oil change
188.50
01 General Fund CORBIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.Registration, K. York, Basic & Intermediate SRO
Training, Me
790.00
01 General Fund CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC 220/Sweep parking lot at Fire Safety Center 80.00
01 General Fund CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC 220/Sweep parking lot at St. 1 160.00
01 General Fund CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC 220/Sweep parking lot at St. 2 100.00
01 General Fund CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC 220/Sweep parking lot at St. 3 100.00
01 General Fund CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC 220/sweep parking lot at St. 4 80.00
01 General Fund CURTIS CLEAN SWEEP INC 220/Sweep parkinglot at St. 5 120.00
01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY breakaway cable crimps & pins for trailers - qty 19 21.97
01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY breakaway cable crimps & pins for trailers - qty 24 7.72
01 General Fund DAVID JONES Expense Report, D. Jones, FDIC Convention,
Indianapolis IN,
25.00
01 General Fund DONE RITE TREE CO.downtown Box Elder tree removal at Main & State - qty
1
400.00
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
17-0259 Labor & Misc Equipment to Complete New K9
Unit #160
3,998.00
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Emergency Light Programming Change for Unit # 21 132.00
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Fix MDT Power Supply, Update LED Flashlight Unit
#130
74.00
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Install Cradlepoint in Unit #140 360.28
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Install Cradlepoint on Unit #130 360.28
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Labor to Replace Warning Light for Unit #12 74.00
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Remove Equipment to sell vehicle, Unit # 134 750.00
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Remove Police Equipment for Sale of Unit # 126 750.00
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Siren Speaker Replacement Unit #526 332.49
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Update Verizon Connection, Install Cradlepoint 360.28
01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Update/Install Cradlepoint & LED Flashlight Charger 360.28
01 General Fund ESP PRINTING & MAILING remaining balance due 2017 Spring Activity Guide qty
8,807
714.67
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 2
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund ETC INSTITUTE 17-0227, Survey Printing & Mailing, Database & Web
Set-Up
7,100.00
01 General Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Generations Plaza plumbing parts - qty 4 3.97
01 General Fund FORGE instructor fee - Shoshin Ryu for Beginners 4/1-4/29/17
x 3
84.00
01 General Fund GEM STATE COMMUNICATIONS INC Renaissance Park cell modem antenna cables - qty 50 96.06
01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY CO gloves, paper towels, bowl cleaner - qty 28 1,610.42
01 General Fund GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE &
SERVICE CENTER
220/MF021, 8 tire switch, loose drive rotation 109.25
01 General Fund GOSNEY MANAGEMENT, LLC.instructor fee - Creepy Cool Art 4/8-4/29/17 - qty 3 120.00
01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Settlers mainline repair parts - qty 32 350.10
01 General Fund HITS INC Registration, M. Ferrunato, Advanced Roadside
Interview Tech
250.00
01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Stair Tread Tape for K9 Equip & Push Broom 62.92
01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Tread Tape for Stairs on K9 Agility Equip 12.97
01 General Fund HRE LLC Tenzinga Performance Management Annual License Fee 480.00
01 General Fund ID COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
& VICTIM ASSISTANCE
Registration, C. Gonzalez, ICDVVA June Training
Conference,
50.00
01 General Fund ID COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
& VICTIM ASSISTANCE
Registration, D. Mersch, ICDVVA June Training
Conference, Bo
50.00
01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2200136188, Parks Power April 2017 10,247.49
01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2203586629, Street Lights Power April 2017 26,017.29
01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Porter/Fuhrma - New Beginnings Day
Care
91.76
01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Public Hearing 6/1/17 for Mason, Et Al 65.86
01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notices for Collection Equip Fac Bid & Ord#
17-1724
122.37
01 General Fund IDAHO STATE INSURANCE FUND #36670, Workers Comp Payroll Premium 1/1/17-4/1/17 107,142.77
01 General Fund IDAHO SUICIDE PREVENTION HOTLINE MYAC Food Frenzy Fundraiser 15% Donation, 4/21/17 18.17
01 General Fund IDASEW, LLC 220/ Hem uniform pants - Qty 3 36.00
01 General Fund IMPACT PEST SERVICES pest control at Ten Mile Interchange at NE side 250.00
01 General Fund INSIGHT ARCHITECTS, pa Space Needs Planning & Programming for Bay 5 @
Homecourt
2,376.00
01 General Fund INT'L CODE COUNCIL 220/4 Fire Inspector Guide Books 102.29
01 General Fund JENSEN BELTS ASSOC professional services for Kleiner Memorial Plaza
pre-design
480.00
01 General Fund JOURNAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SVCS 220/JEMS Subscription renewal, April 2017 to April
2018
19.99
01 General Fund KATHERINE RIGGS instructor fee - Hot Hula Fitness 4/6-4/27/17 - qty 2 51.20
01 General Fund KATHY DRURY-BOGLE, PHR 17-0051, EDP Program Fees for April 2017 2,000.00
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 3
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund KATHY DRURY-BOGLE, PHR Emotional Intelligence 2.0 book-train MPR staff 4/21,
5/5/17
400.00
01 General Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE 17-0242 price code 1/landscape maint contract May
2017
20,621.00
01 General Fund LEAPFOX LEARNING 220/Leapfox Visio Course, Gerhart/Boucher, local June
6
600.00
01 General Fund LEGACY FEED & FUEL 220/supplies to repair saws, grips, plugs, sprokets,
bearing
369.85
01 General Fund LEXIS NEXIS On-line legal research, 4/1/17-4/30/17 175.00
01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pre-Pay PD#2, #8563, Low Balance as of 5/18/17 3,000.00
01 General Fund MERCER HEALTH & BENEFITS 17-0060, Health & Benefits Consulting May 2017 4,166.67
01 General Fund MERIDIAN CHAMBER of COMMERCE Lunch, R. Simison, Economic Development Committee
Meeting, 5
12.00
01 General Fund MERIDIAN CHAMBER of COMMERCE Lunch, R. Simison, Government Affairs Committee
Meeting,
12.00
01 General Fund MERIDIAN TROPHY Plaques for PD, Emp Year, Officer Year & Supervisor
Year
258.00
01 General Fund MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES COMPANY 220/Repair Thermal Imager, A5-2832-A06 754.09
01 General Fund MINUTEMAN, INC.key & door lock repairs at Heroes 109.95
01 General Fund MINUTEMAN, INC.Settlers tennis kiosk extra keys - qty 2 4.50
01 General Fund MISTER CAR WASH April 2017 PD Fleet Washes 150.00
01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Business Cards for PD 270.00
01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Cut & Fold Newsletters - Qty 30,000 385.00
01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Finance Dept. Window Envelopes - Qty 5000 272.00
01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Trim 'Do The Right' Cards - Qty 2900 30.00
01 General Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS part for Settlers sprayer - qty 1 43.55
01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee-Cheer,Ballet,Tap,Jazz,Tumble
4/3-4/27/17 x 65
1,496.00
01 General Fund MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SVCS 220/2 AFW Quick release suspenders for turnouts 99.35
01 General Fund NORCO 220/Welding wire to weld pullup bars - qty 11 LB 40.37
01 General Fund NOVUS AUTO GLASS Rock Chip Repair for Unit# 167 & Unit# 99 70.00
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Keyboard Duster 4.24
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Keyboard/Mouse Wrls, Mk Tiss, Puffs, Lotion - Qty 7 60.18
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Toner for Crystal Ritchie Office Printer 128.99
01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Toners & Paper - Qty 3 206.41
01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Credit for Returned Ink Cartridge the Wrong Size (78.99)
01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Credit for Returned Pencils on Inv# 79548-0 - Qty 1 (18.24)
01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Pencils for PD - Qty 1 Dozen 2.79
01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Toner for Printer in Records 115.77
01 General Fund ON THE SPOT CLEANERS #15 Dry Cleaning for PD Uniforms - Qty 182 910.00
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 4
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund OXARC, INC.220/Medical oxygen 35.80
01 General Fund OXARC, INC.Fire Extinguisher for Unit #160 76.50
01 General Fund PAIGE MECHANICAL GROUP, INC.Homecourt ceiling exhaust fan repairs 941.28
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER diesel for transfer tank 15; unleaded fuel for truck 15 319.88
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER diesel fuel for transfer tank 13 37.46
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER diesel fuel for transfer tank 9 141.04
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER super unleaded fuel for fleet truck 5 50.00
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 11 66.85
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 17 80.29
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 30 59.00
01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 9 38.13
01 General Fund PETER T MEGIS JR repair Welcome to Meridian sign at split corridor 540.00
01 General Fund PORTAPROS, LLC portable toilets for HMS ball fields 4/10-5/7/17 498.00
01 General Fund PORTAPROS, LLC portable toilets for Jabil Fields 3/28-4/24/17 249.00
01 General Fund PORTAPROS, LLC portable toilets for Storey Bark Park 12/3/16-1/24/17 254.25
01 General Fund PORTAPROS, LLC portable toilets for Storey Bark Park 4/4-4/18/17 197.00
01 General Fund PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL Registration, M. Panter, Practical Kinesic Interview
Phase I
325.00
01 General Fund RANDY S LATTIMER instructor fee - Line Dancing 4/9-4/30/17 - qty 10 160.00
01 General Fund REAL ANIMAL MANAGEMENT 17-0095 goose management services - April 2017 1,830.00
01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86172150, Copier Lease for Patrol - June 2017 273.94
01 General Fund ROBERT SIMISON Expense Report, R. Simison, Boise Metro Chamber of
Commerce
38.25
01 General Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY paint for Heroes Park restrooms - qty 1 130.38
01 General Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY paint primer for Heroes Park restroom - qty 1 84.95
01 General Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY paint rollers for Heroes Park restroom - qty 2 7.28
01 General Fund SAFETY ENTERPRISE, INC.04/2017: DOT Load Securement, Dress for Weather,
Respirators
75.00
01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC.220/shredding, St. 4 31.49
01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Banners & Bases for Youth Farmers Market - Qty 3 911.70
01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Decals for K9 Agility Equipment - Qty 7 105.00
01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC logo decals & custom lettering for Homecourt branding
x 105
270.10
01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Remove City Graphics to Sell Bike Unit #520 35.00
01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Sections of Plastic for Stairs on K9 Agility Equip 12.50
01 General Fund SOUTHEASTERN SECURITY
CONSULTANTS, INC.
background check for instructor & volunteers - qty 10 185.00
01 General Fund STERLING CODIFIERS INC Codification 1,787.00
01 General Fund STRICTLY TECHNOLOGY Plantronics Hook Switch Designed for ShoreTel Phones 29.99
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 5
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
01 General Fund STRICTLY TECHNOLOGY Ubiquiti Networks - 10 pack of 5GHz Nanobeam AC,
19d Bi
197.98
01 General Fund SUNNY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.Repair of 2 Portable Radios 562.00
01 General Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC.17-0217 design services Lemp/Larkwood Pathway
04/2017
1,024.00
01 General Fund THE UPS STORE 220/Send in Thermal Imager for repair 64.64
01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Postage to Return Pants 12.66
01 General Fund TOTAL SYSTEMS SVCS, INC.HVAC service at Community Center 335.00
01 General Fund TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE
DATA SOLUTIONS
TLO Charges for April FY17 115.92
01 General Fund TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE
DATA SOLUTIONS
TLOxp Charges Mar FY17 134.62
01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY CHILDREN'S
THEATER, LLC.
2nd Payment for FY17 Agreement With Youth
Theatre-Harriet Th
1,500.00
01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE Coffee, Hot Chocolate, Cream, Sugar, Stir Sticks & Cups 392.96
01 General Fund USSSOA basketball officiating 5/1-5/5/17 - qty 9 games 472.59
01 General Fund USSSOA volleyball officiating 5/1-5/5/17 - qty 41 games 894.45
01 General Fund WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 17-0111, Purell, Cascade, Recycle Container Lids - Qty
7
158.98
01 General Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 220/ 4 MSA Respirators & 6 cartridges for fire
inspectors
127.13
01 General Fund WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRIC Refund, Storey Park WARD Pool House Project Soft
Permit Fees
26,463.02
01 General Fund WIENHOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC 17-0115, Drug & Alcohol Testing - Qty 12, April 2017 360.00
01 General Fund WIENHOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC Pre-Employment Testing for L. Curley & A. Reyes 120.00
01 General Fund WW GRAINGER, INC 220/AA & C Batteries for equipment, St. 5 - qty 3 pkg 18.06
01 General Fund WW GRAINGER, INC 220/garden hose nozzles, 2 45.88
01 General Fund WW GRAINGER, INC 220/St. 1, shop supplies, degreaser & linseed oil - qty 3 64.53
01 General Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA MX1-198654, Xerox 7835 base fee - April 2017 312.69
Total 01 General Fund 266,077.79
07 Impact Fund BRIGHT IDEAS LIGHTING COMPANY install construction progress camera at Hillsdale Park 112.50
07 Impact Fund ESI, INC 16-0400, 17-0262, Reta Huskey Park Pre-Construction
& CM Ser
200,647.28
07 Impact Fund JENSEN BELTS ASSOC 17-0292 construction administration-Reta Huskey Park
04/2017
1,615.00
07 Impact Fund SPF WATER ENGINEERING, LLC prof svcs Hillsdale Park well construction design
04/2017
1,890.25
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 6
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
07 Impact Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC.16-0186 prof svcs K Bird Legacy Park master plan
04/2017
1,740.00
07 Impact Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC.16-0355 A&E services for 77-Acre South Meridian Park
04/2017
12,857.25
07 Impact Fund THE RUSSELL CORPORATION 17-0234, CM Services for Hillsdale Park,
4/1/17-4/30/17
119,242.90
07 Impact Fund THE RUSSELL CORPORATION 17-0235, CM Services for Keith Bird Legacy Park,
4/1/17-4/30
68,031.91
Total 07 Impact Fund 406,137.09
20 Grant Fund
governmental
BEFORE THE MOVIE, INC.17-0223, MADC Natural High On Screen Advertising -
4/17-5/17
2,196.00
20 Grant Fund
governmental
MICHAEL SIKORSKI MADC Shoulder Tap Operation Youth Decoy, 3/31/17 96.00
Total 20 Grant Fund
governmental
2,292.00
60 Enterprise Fund A COMPANY INC Project 10601, Portapotty Service, 4/3/17-4/30/17 90.50
60 Enterprise Fund A-1 STAMP & MABEL'S LABELS Name Plate for T. Converse 10.00
60 Enterprise Fund ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC.Water Testing 3,163.50
60 Enterprise Fund AQUA-AEROBIC SYSTEMS, INC Parts to repair tertiary filter #3 1,088.20
60 Enterprise Fund ARC Document Solutions Project 10044 WRRF Headwork copies of plans - Qty 4 384.72
60 Enterprise Fund BACKFLOW SUPPLY Line Wat/Sewer Maintenance 449.63
60 Enterprise Fund BHS SPECIALTY CHEMICALS 17-0142 Ferric Chloride 6,933.00
60 Enterprise Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 17-0122, MUBS Bills, Delinquent Notes, & Newsletter
Inserts
12,328.65
60 Enterprise Fund BIOAIR SOLUTIONS LLC Nutrients for bio-air tower 764.40
60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XKP547491, Additional Copies 2/3/17-3/2/17 201.49
60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XKP547491, Additional Copies 3/3/17-4/2/17 229.76
60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XKP547491, Copier Lease 1/1/17-1/31/17 275.80
60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XKP547491, Copier Lease 11/1/16-11/30/16 275.80
60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XKP547491, Copier Lease 12/1/16-12/31/16 275.80
60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XKP547491, Copier Lease 2/1/17-2/28/17 275.80
60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XKP547491, Copier Lease 3/1/17-3/31/17 275.80
60 Enterprise Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment XKP547491, Copier Lease 4/1/17-4/30/17 275.80
60 Enterprise Fund BOISE RIGGING SUPPLY Shop Supplies 175.00
60 Enterprise Fund BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES, INC 17-0231, Water Div SCADAProgram, 4/1/17-4/28/17 -
Final Inv
5,639.00
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 7
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
60 Enterprise Fund BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES, INC 17-0246, Well 31 Water Div SCADA Program,
4/1-4/28/17-Final
6,465.50
60 Enterprise Fund BROWN & CALDWELL 1-0147, service 2/24-3/31/17, WRRF Capacity exp 127,846.14
60 Enterprise Fund CITY OF BOISE PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Certification Fee, A. McNutt, Plan Designer Class, Boise
ID,
55.00
60 Enterprise Fund CITY OF BOISE PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Certification Fee, S. O'Brien, Plan Designer Class, Boise
ID
55.00
60 Enterprise Fund CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS 16-0153, service 4/1-4/30/17 Well 30 1,307.99
60 Enterprise Fund CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS 17-0071, service 4/1-4/30/17, ACHD Pine water &
Sewer
11,315.00
60 Enterprise Fund CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS Well 9 Building Design, Service 4/1/17-4/30/17 450.00
60 Enterprise Fund COMMERCIAL TIRE Vehicle Maintenance 31.50
60 Enterprise Fund CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY,Equipment/Supplies 88.40
60 Enterprise Fund CONDOC Project 0596.d, service April 2017, South Black Cat lift
sta
49.99
60 Enterprise Fund CONDOC Project 10050, service April 2017, WRRF Centrate
Equalizer
49.99
60 Enterprise Fund CONDOC Project 10601, service April 2017, WRRF Capacity Exp.49.99
60 Enterprise Fund CONTAINER & PACKAGING SUPPLY 10 oz HDPE sample bottles 88.18
60 Enterprise Fund COT SPA COVERS Labor & Material for Vinyl Covered Foam Pad for Meter
Sets
100.00
60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Equipment/Supplies 219.99
60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY garden hose shut off valve 24.95
60 Enterprise Fund DAN & LYNN SCHABLE Refund, 4660013202, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1904 E Serchio
St, Custom
385.83
60 Enterprise Fund DC FROST ASSOCIATES, INC 17-0166 Parts for UV System 3,939.08
60 Enterprise Fund DC FROST ASSOCIATES, INC 17-0166 UV Board kit relay, receptacle kit & module
power
1,600.93
60 Enterprise Fund DIGLINE, INC.Digline Monthly Tickets 1,621.08
60 Enterprise Fund E C POWER SYSTEMS Well Maintenance & Repair 1,869.04
60 Enterprise Fund ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS, INC.Solids filters 684.69
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Install Cradlepoint antenna & cable C18640 inspection
vehicl
296.00
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Installation of Light Bars, Radio, Antenna, & Cradle
Points
2,953.98
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Installed Cradlepoint antenna & cable C17945
Inspection vehi
296.00
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Installed Cradlepoint antenna & cable C18780
Inspection vehi
296.00
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 8
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Installed Cradlepoint antenna & cable C19159
Inspection vehi
370.00
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Installed Cradlepoint antenna & cable C19160
Inspection vehi
296.00
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Labor & Installation of Cradlepoint Cableing 222.00
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Labor & materials to install tint on driver & passenger 200.00
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Labor & parts to install antenna for communication
system
1,100.98
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Labor to install driver & passenger side window tint on 289.00
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Repair damaged lights on C19159 Inspection Truck 111.00
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Replaced light and bad hide-a-ways C19160 185.00
60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER
SERVICES, INC.
Replaced lights and bad switch in C18780 74.00
60 Enterprise Fund ESP PRINTING & MAILING Postage for 2017 Water Report-16 Page Booklet - Qty
38,557
6,246.23
60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Hi-vis vest size small and medium 34.38
60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Nitrile gloves-size XL 250.40
60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Equipment/Suppplies 35.95
60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Grounds Maintenance 5.48
60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Composite sampler tubing 794.24
60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Filter flasks 198.48
60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Test strips for CN interferences 23.08
60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Trace metals tubing 119.26
60 Enterprise Fund FORSGREN ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0230, Service thru 4/25/17 Water main Ext.
Pengrove
13,326.75
60 Enterprise Fund GREG & THERESA ARNOLD Refund, 0550027502, Wat/Sew/Trash, 5363 N Red
Hills Pl, Cust
35.34
60 Enterprise Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Line Wat/Sewer Repair 1,740.28
60 Enterprise Fund HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS Powder coating & paint brush for stock 59.50
60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Chemicals 2.99
60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Drano clog remover, pink spray paint, staple gun &71.76
60 Enterprise Fund HONSINGER LAW Source Water Protection Water rights service thru
5/1/17
5,220.00
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2204228288, Water Power April 2017 24,566.90
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 9
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Invitation to Bid Locust Grove/Lake
Hazel
71.76
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Invitation to Bid Sewer Services 63.48
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for Invitation to Bid Well 30 Pumping 35.52
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice for WRRF Boise River Pump 4/28/17 &
5/5/17
71.76
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notices for Collection Equip Fac Bid & Ord#
17-1724
63.48
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO STATE INSURANCE FUND #36670, Workers Comp Payroll Premium 1/1/17-4/1/17 27,009.23
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO WATER USERS ASSOC Registration, D. Miles, IWUA Water Law & Resource
Issues Sem
190.00
60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO WATER USERS ASSOC Registration, K. Radek, IWUA Water Law & Resource
Issues Sem
190.00
60 Enterprise Fund INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER UPS batteries for 5YR replacement on generators 2,024.00
60 Enterprise Fund INTERSTATE ELECTRIC SUPPLY Equipment/Supplies 444.86
60 Enterprise Fund KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES Part to rebuild tertiary filter #3 spare 223.97
60 Enterprise Fund KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES Parts to rebuild tertiary filter #3 spare 262.98
60 Enterprise Fund KIMBERLY SYBESMA Refund, 2047111803, Wat/Sew/Trash, 4190 E English
Dr, Auto P
166.08
60 Enterprise Fund L2 EXCAVATION, LLC.Refund Bid Bond Check, Bid# PW-1727-10560.b.r.b,
Contractor
4,084.00
60 Enterprise Fund LAWN CO MAINTENANCE 17-0249 price code 2/landscape maint contract - May
2017
2,705.75
60 Enterprise Fund LEGACY FEED & FUEL STIHL powerhead w/hedger & edger attachments plus
hand held
1,172.22
60 Enterprise Fund LINDSEY A TERNES Refund, 4650112602, Wat/Sew/Trash, 4157 S
Rangewood Way, Cus
50.17
60 Enterprise Fund MARCUM HOMES, LLC.Refund, Surety-War-2015-0021, Arch Rock Terrace
Subdivision,
19,307.92
60 Enterprise Fund MARSHALL & REBEKAH WEST Refund, 1521264803, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2286 N Hyde
Ave, Customer
99.36
60 Enterprise Fund MASTERCARD MC Pre-Pay PW#1, #8639, Low Balance as of 5/18/17 4,000.00
60 Enterprise Fund MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY Flow switch for rehab project at S. Black Cat lift station 255.80
60 Enterprise Fund MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY Flow switches for RAS pump seal repairs 760.00
60 Enterprise Fund MICHAEL & CAROLYN THOMPSON Refund, 4655090503, Wat/Sew/Trash, 4668 S
Glenmere Way, Titl
217.51
60 Enterprise Fund MIDGLEY-HUBER INC Spare Lab HVAC actuators 790.00
60 Enterprise Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Line Wat/Sewer Repair Supplies 12.65
60 Enterprise Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Parts to install new pumps in sump at S. Black Cat lift 60.77
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 10
City Of Meridian
Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie
Code
Fund
Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount
60 Enterprise Fund MOUNTAIN WATERWORKS, INC 16-0229, Tertiary Crane Design, service thru 4/21/17 -
Final
335.00
60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Sanding drum kit 16.07
60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Seal water valve to replace existing leaking valve 38.39
60 Enterprise Fund MYFLEETCENTER.COM Vehicle Maintenance 66.38
60 Enterprise Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS Heavy duty belt 38.13
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Staples, Batteries, Toners, Wire Hooks, File Labels,
Post-It
418.71
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Brother labels for Lab, busines card holder for Kevin S.
&
170.59
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Business card holder for Tony Parks 10.59
60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Office Supplies 155.58
60 Enterprise Fund OXARC, INC.17-0056, Sodium Hypochlorite Delivery - Qty 920gl 1,541.60
60 Enterprise Fund OXARC, INC.17-0057, Sodium Hyplochlorite Delivery - Qty 1152gl 1,919.76
60 Enterprise Fund PACIFIC STEEL & RECYCLING Shop Supplies 54.74
60 Enterprise Fund PLATT Parts to replace lamps in old HVAC room in Lab 79.21
60 Enterprise Fund PLATT Returned timer (35.64)
60 Enterprise Fund RODDA PAINT COMPANY Front sign paint 65.80
60 Enterprise Fund SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.Paint & brushes to cover up graffiti 34.95
60 Enterprise Fund SIGNS, ETC Vehicle Lettering 23.00
60 Enterprise Fund SPF WATER ENGINEERING, LLC 15-0371, service 4/1-4/30/17, Source water
protection, right
204.75
60 Enterprise Fund SPF WATER ENGINEERING, LLC 17-0126, service 4/1-4/30/17, Well 29 500.00
60 Enterprise Fund SULLIVAN REBERGER 17-0008, Lobbing fees April 2017 4,000.00
60 Enterprise Fund SUSIE DEARDORFF Expense Report, S. Deardorff, PNCWA Public
Communications Ca
267.53
60 Enterprise Fund TECHNI CHEM CORPORATION Glycol for heat loop 270.00
60 Enterprise Fund TMG SERVICES INC Chemical feed pumps - Qty 3 7,553.06
60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE
CO
Refund, Surety-War-2015-0013, United Heritage Bldg
2, Final
1,682.80
60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Microporous hooded coverall size 2XL & hose fittings 166.20
Total 60 Enterprise Fund 334,742.37
Report Total 1,009,249.25
Date: 5/18/17 12:23:40 PM Page: 11
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 8A
ITEM TITLE:
City Scholarship Presentations
PROJECT NUMBER:
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 8B
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Dairy Board Request for Cost Share for the Annual Dairy Days Parade
MEETING NOTES
N* -� e
f
APPROVED L
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Welcome to 88th Annual Meridian Dairy Days: June 22-24,2017
Located at the Meridian Speedway and Storey Park
YJZiLtJ/I�GU L Brought to you by the Meridian Dairy Board and sponsored by:
� C
since 1929
�y Check www.dairydays.orE for updated information f
MOUNTAIN AMERICA
CREDIT UNION
This Year also the Meridian Lions PRCA Rodeo
June 24 and 25 — 6054 W. Cherry Lane (Cherry Lane & McDermott)
Monday, June 19
7:00 p.m. 68"' Annual Meridian Dairy Days Princess Pageant — SpurWing Country Club, Meridian
Thursday, June 22
11:00 a.m. Dairy Cattle can start to check in
5:00 P.M. BROWN'S AMUSEMENTS CARNIVAL at the Meridian Speedway opens
4:00 p.m. Old McDonalds Farm at the Dairy Barn opens till 10:00 p.m. FREE, put on by the Crafty Critter 4-11 Club
4:30 p.m. 67' Annual PANCAKE FEED with all the trimmings, next to the Dairy Barn, with all the proceeds going to
the Meridian Food Bank and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Fund.
Adults $6, Seniors and Kids 6-12 $5
- 'Nine 23
10:00 a.m. Old McDonalds Farm at the Dairy Barn opens till 10:00 p.m. FREE, put on by the Crafty Critter 4-H Club
10:00 a.m. 4-H & FFA work shop at the Dairy Barn
12:00 noon Food Vendors in Storey Park open
3:00 p.m. BROWN'S AMUSEMENTS CARNIVAL at the Meridian Speedway opens
3:00 p.m. Meridian Pool Bash at the Meridian Swimming Pool till 5:00 p.m.
3:00-4:15 Open Swim with 2 canned food item donation; 4:15 — 5:00 Belly Flop Contest
5:00 p.m. Dairy Days Grass Volleyball at Storey Park Softball Fields
6:45 p.m. 'REAL DAIRY' PARADE' Starts at the Speedway, Main Street, Fairview, 2 I/Z & 3rd streets.
8:00 —10:00 pm Music by Weatherhead Music School, Meridian Downtown Business Association
Dusk FREE Fireworks inside the Speedway
11:00 P.M. Food vendors and the Carnival close
Saturday, June 24
8:00 a.m. Dairy Days SK & 1 Mile Run sponsored by the Pulse Running & Fitness Shop.
Starts in the Speedway — 8:00 a.m. Start 1 mile; 8:30 a.m. Start 5K
8:00 a.m. Old McDonalds Farm at the Dairy Barn opens, FREE, put on by the Crafty Critter 4-11 Club
9:00 a.m. 4-11 and FFA Dairy Cattle and Dairy Goat Show at the Dairy Barn and Speedway Infield
9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Dairy Days Art in the Park put on by the Meridian Arts Commission
With activities for the kids and entertainment for the whole family, such as the Idaho National
Guard Rock Climbing Wall.
9:00 a.m. Dairy Days Grass Volleyball at Storey Park Softball Fields
9:00 a.m. —Noon Meridian Youth Farmers Market at the Meridian City Hall Plaza
10:00 a.m. Food Vendors open in Storey Park
12:00 noon BROWN'S AMUSEMENTS CARNIVAL at the Meridian Speedway opens
4:00 p.m. Old McDonalds Farm closes
4:00 p.m. Meridian Lions Pre Rodeo Events — 6054 W. Cherry Lane
5:00 P.M. Meridian Lions Rodeo Starts — 6054 W. Cherry Lane
6:30 p.m. CWI Dairy Day Races at the Meridian Speedway - $11
11:00 P.M. Dairy Days Closes
'�,y June 26
1:00 P.M. Meridian Lions Pre Rodeo Events — 6054 W. Cherry Lane
2:00 p.m. Meridian Lions Rodeo Starts — 6054 W. Cherry Lane
SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY
348 Northwest 13th Place 9 Meridian, Idaho 83642
Irrsum cmansme $arn Phone (208) 322-6800 • Fax (208) 322-2636 • Toll Free (888) 574-7732
www.specialtysupply.com
Idaho Public Works License # PWC -C -12763 -AAA -2-4 (02785, 01550, 18700, 01570, 07100)
EIN # 20-8122260
DUNS # 19-710-7550
Contractor License # RCE -20560
Oregon Construction Registration #178588
QUOTATION
Estimator: Daniel Kircher
Project: Meridian Dairy Days 2017
ITEM QUANTITY UNITS DESCRIPTION
100 mnhr Mobilization & Maintenance
Estimate Only
120 ea Traffic Control Signs
40 ea Barricades
200 ea Tubular Markers (Candies)
5 ea Arrow Board
Page 1
Bid Date:
4/5/2017
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
$ 27.50
$
2,750.00
$ 2.75
$
330.00
$ 4.25
$
170.00
$ 1.75
$
350.00
$ 39.75
$
198.75
27 mnhr Flagging $ 20.00 $ 540.00
- 9 flaggers, three hours
TOTAL $ 4,38.75
"Any changes or additional signs (added by ACHD or others) will be billed at the per each pricing. -
" No special signs (information signs or street nameplates) included. Additional fees would apply.
* Quantifies are estimates only - unit price prevails.
Bid bond not included in price - if required, add 2.5% to overall quote total.
` Prices quoted include sales or use tax. ' Prices are based on furnishing all of the material on this
' Totals and average prices are shown for your convenience. quotation. Prices on individual items may be negotiated.
Our invoice will reflect the unit prices for the actual quantities ' Quantities are based on our take off and are not guaranteed.
required and furnished. ' Above prices quoted for acceptance within 30 days and
` Does not include light towers. apply to this project only.
www.invarion.com
^i SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY
a 348 NW 13th Place, Meridian, ID.
Phone (208) 322-6800 Fax (208) 322-2636
s4 Toll Free (888) 574-7732 NORTH
www.specialtysupply.com
svRlsurealtsresrnss9vvu ,,,,a„
oos
Cherry.
bac ...SEGO
yyashington
I i
Caron
I uawv
State
'�-
Pine 6� 3t } All
Idaho -
�� Yo
k e ' t: a
These side streets listed will have I�- ±� II i - Broadway , O of 5o� ou=
Type 111 Barricades and Road Closed
Ahead signs at Main Street:
Broadway
Du1Fwu
Bower -
Ada 1 II r r it - - - Bower ao
King _
Williams gg
XX A
`o
_ y� r msoia off. i
- • t E _ moa 9
i s
W. • - ��
� 0.03m
( ROM
-
l:
Place Road Closed Ahead On All Sidestreets
Leading Up To Every Type 3
o� anomia Every Flogger Will Be Covered With Flagging
-- r: Signs
ttW®
'All traffic control will be placed to M.U.TC.D. spacing standards
as adopted by the State of Idaho
'This plan is the copyright of Specialty Construction Supply
and iCs use is restricted to use by permission only
'Contractors will be responsible for placing delineation
around objects left in the right of way
'This is not a Engineer stamped plan
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: Mav 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 8C
ITEM TITLE:
ACHD Chipseal Program
PROJECT NUMBER:
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Tim Nicholson, P.E.
Maintenance
Manager
Our Mission: We Drive Quality Transportation for all Ada County -Anytime, Anywhere!
23 May 2017
Meridian City
Chip Seal
Briefing
Why do we do it?
Chip Seal costs approx. $0.17/SF vs. Mill & Overlay approx. $1.75/SF
Total anticipated cost: $8 million
Total team hours: 25,000
2017 Planning Totals:
550 Lane Miles of Road
7,000 tons Liquid Asphalt
57,000 tons Aggregate Chips
43 Working Days
June 7, 2017 –Training (Soft Start)
June 12, 2017 –Official Start Date
June 29-July 4, 2017 –No Chip Sealing for
Holiday
August 31, 2017 –Estimated Completion
September 7, 2017 –Chip Seal Celebration
April 12, 2017 –Traffic evaluated peak hour
restrictions
May 8, 2017–Met with Police Representatives from
ACSO and Meridian
May 10, 2017 -Commission Overview
May 16, 2017 -Boise City Council Presentation
May 23, 2017 –Eagle City Council Presentation
May 23, 2017 –Meridian City Council Presentation
June 7, 2017 –Star City Council Presentation
N
4
9
CL
91 AMH
m
M
N
N !n
m
N
N
n
N C
m
n
ro ry
N
N m
e N�
N
�OaGN3"OHS3SMOH
ogab
oa
Z���
0
a
u
L9
N
4
9
CL
91 AMH
pxw3ang jeasd!y7LLOZ leu!d19LOZ-L-ZIVeardlyplL1pZFgeuoZ4u!eyrnal&sauoZ aaueva!ulely anpeluanaidFOiN 9:yled luawnao0 LLW/OZX:-)
3
t
U
00
M
�OaGN3"OHS3SMOH
F—t-
T
3lIW 3AId i
-
+I
J
r
L IL
PJ
N1
Oa 3lVaa3AOlO
C4
x
1
CL
1 a
xr
e 3
as 31
7
IxCL
, h
r LFix
-
a 3noao
IsnOol
-Ix..
r
- -
1S NIV4Y
`1
JU
Oa NVIgIa3W
-
j.�,1:�I�
ti
3 f
H3ONIl
i
-o
Na:-
Oa
-I vDo
1
— v
�
C
tf
cb
1Y
a
_
w
j
a
f=ti
-'
+_+
0 3lIW N31
It
/T
LL. -
,r.s __ !.,,
ON IVO NOVI.a
T
CL
w
L
bl
K
C
w
� a
v
–Oaa3WWald..
aauowa3oow
Q�r
NCL
11w
cr
"W
I
t _ ¢
O
UH avis
U
'
nava xva
naval
NV3
pxw3ang jeasd!y7LLOZ leu!d19LOZ-L-ZIVeardlyplL1pZFgeuoZ4u!eyrnal&sauoZ aaueva!ulely anpeluanaidFOiN 9:yled luawnao0 LLW/OZX:-)
3
t
U
00
M
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9A
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: Bainbridge Subdivision No. 5
Continued from May 16, 2017: Final Plat for Bainbridge Subdivision No. 5 (H-2017-0043)
by Brighton Investments, LLC Located Approximately 1/2 Mile South of W. Chinden
Boulevard and 1/4 Mile West of N. Ten Mile RoadRequest: Final Plat Approval Consisting
of Twenty -Six (26) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 7.56 Acres of Land in an R-
8 Zoning District
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Planning & Zoning
Commission Meeting
May 23, 2017
Item #9A: Bainbridge
Zoning Map
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââ
ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â
R-4
R1
RUT
R-15
R-8
L-O
RUT
R-4R-15
R-4
R-8
R1
C-C
R-4
RUT
L-O
R-8
R-8
L-O
R-4
RUT
R-4
R-8
L-O
C-G
C-C
R-8
R-8
L-O
C-N
R-15
R-15
R-15
L-O
R-8
R-8
L-O
R-2
L-O
R-8
N
T
E
N
M
I
L
E
R
D
W M C M I L L A N R D
W CHINDEN BLVD
N
L
O
N
G
L
A
K
E
W
A
Y
W CHINDEN BLVD
N
G O D D
A
R
D
C R E E K W A Y
N
B
L
A
C
K
C
A
T
R
D
W LOS FLORESDR
N
S A N
V I T O
W A Y
W WOLF RAPIDS ST
W WOLF RAPIDS DR
N
D A L L A S
A V E
WSTARHOLLOWDR
N
T
H
R
E
E
LI
N
K
S
L
N
W BOULDER
BAR DR
N
S I L V E R
S P R U C E
A V E
N
E L M S T O N E
A V E
W AVILLA DR
N
S E A C L I F F
A V E
W TANGO CREEK ST
W SUNNY COVE ST
W LOST RAPID S D R
W EVEREST ST
N
SE
A
W
I
N
D
A
V
E
W PHILOMENA ST
W LOS
FLORES ST
W VANDERBILT DR
W TANGO CREEK DR
W WAPOOT ST
N
J
O
Y
W
A
Y
N
T A N G O
R A P I D S
W A Y
N
B I G
C E D A R
A V E
N
V E R C E L L I
W A Y
W SELWAY RAPIDS L N
N
E Y N S F O R D
A V
E
W DAPHNE ST
W ROOT CREEK ST
W LOS FLORES ST
W ANATOLE DR
N J A Y K E R W A Y
N
R U S T I C
O A K
W A Y
N PEN N C R O S S W A YWSTARHOLLOWDR
NTI
G
N
E
S
A
V
E
W LOS FLORES ST
W D I T C H C R E E K DR
NTREEFARMWAY
N
A
D
A
L
E
AV
E
W LOST
R APIDS ST
W APGAR CRE E K D R
W DITCH CREEK ST
W CEDAR GROVE ST
W DIVIDE CREEK ST
N
B L A C K
S A N D
A V E
W GONDOLA DR
W ROOT CREEK ST
W LADLE RAPIDS ST
W CEDAR
GROVE ST
W VANDERBILT DR
W DIVIDE
CREEK ST
W BAYOAKST
W KELLY
CREEK DR
W WAPOOT DR
W APGAR
CREEK LN
W EVEREST
LN
W GRAND
TETON DR
W
G
L
ADE CREEK DR
W G LADE
C R E EK ST
N F A I R B O R N A V E
W
RATTLESNAKE
DR
W CEDAR
GROVE ST
W WAPOOT S T
W RAVENNA ST
W DAPHNE ST
W RIVA
CAPRI ST
W SAND
WEDGE S T
N
E X E T E R
A V E
NLONICERA
W
A
Y
W LOS FLORES CT
W MILANO ST
N
S I L V E R
M A P L E
A V E
N
L
E
V
I
L
N
NLONGLAK
E
W
A
Y
W BAY O A K S T
W RAMBLIN CT
W DIVIDE CREEK DR
W SELWAY RIVER LN
W MILANO DR
W HUNGRY C R E E K
D R
W MALTA DR
WBALAT A C T
W LARRY LN
NTREEHAVENWAY
N
D O U B L E E A G L E L N
N
E L I S H A
A V E
N S A L V I A W A Y
N
J
O
Y
A
V
E
N
C A R L E S E
A V E
N
B O L S E N A
A V E
N A S I S S I
W A Y
N
W
H
I
T
E
C
A
P
L
N
N L E V E N H A M A V E
N
T
O
S
C
A
N
A
A
V
E
N
S
I
L
V
E
R
E
L
M
W
A
Y
N
C O R T O N A
W A Y
N
A
R
E
Z
Z
O
A
V
E
N
B L A C K
S A N D
A V E N
L O L O
P A S S
A V E
N
L
O
L
O
P
A
S
S
W
A
Y
NMOONDRUMMERW
A
Y
N
E X E T E R
A V E
W TURI N C T
N SPURWING LN
N
MA
P
L
E
S
T
O
N
E
A
V
E
N
S
T
A
N
L
E
Y
CR
E
E
K
A
V
E
N
J
O
Y
S
T
N
B L A C K
S A N D
A V E
N
S
P
U
R
W
I
N
G
W
A
Y
4N1W21 4N1W22 4N1W23
4N1W28
4N1W27
4N1W26
4N1W33
4N1W34 4N1W35
Final Plat
Landscape Plan
Updated Development Plan with Updated Qualified Open Space Exhibit
Item #9B: Reflection Ridge
Zoning Map
Item #9C: Gyro Shack
Zoning Map
Vicinity Map
Landscape Plan
Item #9D: Goddard Creek Subdivision
Vicinity/Zoning/Aerial Map
Comprehensive Plan Proposal
Proposed Preliminary Plat
Landscape Plan
Landscape Plan
Conceptual Building Elevations
Item #9E: New Beginnings
Vicinity/Zoning/Aerial Map
Conceptual Development
Plan/Lot Layout Exhibit
Landscape Plan
Short Plat
Conceptual Building Elevation
Item #9F: Rockbury Subdivision
Vicinity/Zoning/Aerial Map
Approved Concept Plan
Proposed Preliminary Plat
Site/Landscape Plan
Conceptual Building Elevations
Changes to Agenda: None
[However, Council may want to move Items #9A: Bainbridge Sub. 5 – FP (H-2017-0043) and #9B: Reflection Ridge Sub. 5 –
VAC (H-2017-0060) to the consent agenda as the applicants are in agreement w/the staff reports (responses were received
after the agenda was published).]
Item #9A: Bainbridge Subdivision No. 5 - FP (H-2017-0043)
Application(s):
Final Plat
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 7.56 acres of land, zoned R-8, located approximately ½ mile
south of W. Chinden Blvd.
Summary of Request: The proposed final plat depicts 26 SFR building lots & 4 common lots on 7.56 acres of land in an R-8 zoning
district. The minimum property size in this phase is 8,328 s.f. with an average size of 9,762 s.f.
A total of 0.45 of an acre of open space is proposed consisting of parkways and landscaped common lots. A micropath is proposed as
an amenity. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat and deems it in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat.
With the previous phase final plat the applicant was required to submit an updated conceptual development plan with an open space
exhibit to demonstrate how the increase in building lots and decrease in common area with previous phases would play out in later
phases of the development. The updated plan includes 10 additional building lots that the applicant states will either be deleted through
future phases or be included in a new preliminary plat with another 2.5 acre parcel in the north area of the development that the
applicant is trying to acquire. The open space area is substantially the same.
Written Testimony: Jon Wardle – In agreement w/the staff report
Notes:
Possible Motions:
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0043, as presented in the staff
report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0043, as presented during the
hearing on May 23, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0043 to the hearing date of May 23, 2017 for the following reason(s): (You should state
specific reason(s) for continuance.)
Item #9B: Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. 5 (Lot 17, Block 12) - VAC (H-2017-0060)
Application(s):
Vacation
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 0.41 of an acre of land, zoned R-8, located at 635 E. Vivid Sky
Drive.
History: In 2016, the final plat depicting the easement proposed to be vacated was recorded.
Summary of Request: The applicant requests approval to vacate a slope easement depicted and noted on Lot 17, Block 12 of the
Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. 5 recorded plat. The slope is entirely within the subject lot and vacation of such will not require the
adjustment of any existing public utility easements.
In previous phases of the development, slope easements were shown on certain lots where the developer planned to install
Homeowner’s Association maintained grass on large slopes between tiers of lots. In other locations, private homeowner would maintain
the slope and easements for such weren’t necessary. In those cases, many homeowners chose to modify the slope with the addition of
retaining walls to increase the usable yard and flat building area of the lot.
The applicant states the slope easement should not have been depicted on the plat for the subject lot; at this location, the slope is
privately maintained.
With approval of the proposed slope easement vacation, the building/homeowner will be allowed to modify the extent of the slo pe with
a rock retaining wall, subject to City building permit requirements and setbacks.
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Written Testimony: Matt Schultz – In agreement w/staff report
Notes:
Possible Motions:
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0060, as presented in the staff
report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0060, as presented during the
hearing on May 23, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0060 to the hearing date of May 23, 2017 for the following reason(s): (You should state
specific reason(s) for continuance.)
Item #9C: Gyro Shack at Paramount (H-2017-0059)
Application(s):
Council Review
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 0.493 of an acre of land, zoned C-G, located at 5038 N. Linder
Road.
Adjacent Land Use & Zoning:
North: Dutch Bros. Coffee, zoned C-G
East: Linder Springs Townhomes, zoned C-G
South: Kelson Orthodontics, zoned C-G
West: Kelly Creek Subdivision, zoned C-G
History:
In 2004, this property was annexed as part of Paramount Subdivision (AZ-03-006) with a Development Agreement, recorded
as Instrument No. 103137116.
In 2003, a preliminary plat (PP-03-004) and conditional use permit/planned development (CUP-03-008) was approved for
Paramount Subdivision which include the subject property. This property was designated on the conceptual site pla n for
retail/office uses.
In 2007, this property was included in the following approvals:
Preliminary plat (PP-07-011) for 18 commercial building lots on 18.5 acres of land in a C-G zoning district;
Development Agreement modification (MI-07-007) to remove the conditional use permit requirement and require
design review approval instead for all commercial development in the C-G and L-O zoning districts, recorded as
Instrument No. 107145935.
In 2012, a final plat (FP-12-019) was approved for Commercial Southwest Subdivision No. 2 which includes the subject
property as Lot 2, Block 2.
In 2017, the property received approval for a drive-through for a restaurant.
Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Commercial
Summary of Request: On April 6, 2017, the property was granted Conditional Use Permit approval for a drive through. As part of that
approval there was a condition that the applicant provide the required landscape buffer adjacent to a residential use. The applicant has
submitted an application for Council Review regarding that condition in the staff report (condition 1.3b, see memo below)
Written Testimony: None
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Notes:
Possible Motions:
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve of File Number H-2017-0059, as presented in the staff
report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0059, as presented during the
hearing on May 23, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0059 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following
reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance)
Item #9D: Goddard Creek – H-2017-0007
Application(s):
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development in an R-40 zoning district.
Conditional Use Permit for a self-storage facility in a C-C zoning district.
Rezone
Preliminary Plat
Development Agreement Modification
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: The subject property consists of 12.38 acres of land zoned R-4 at 2780 W. McMillan
Road.
Adjacent Land Use & Zoning:
1. North: Selway Apartments, zoned R-4
2. East: Residential property with a home, zoned L-O
3. South: W. McMillan Road and single-family homes in the R-4 and R-8 zoning districts
4. West: Vacant commercial property, zoned L-O
History: This property was granted annexation, preliminary plat, and a conditional use permit as part of the Lochsa Falls Subdivision in
2002 (AZ-02-010, PP-02-009, CUP 02-012) and has a development agreement (Instrument #102012598). The conditional use permit
allowed for 11 office buildings to be built within the R-4 zoning district. The subject property was one such property selected to have
office uses.
Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: HDR, Office
A. Summary of Request: Rezone (RZ):
The applicant requests approval to rezone 12.38 acres of land from R-4 to R-40 (5 acres) and C-C (7.38 acres) zoning
districts consistent with the proposed FLUM designation of MU-C.
The applicant has submitted a site plan that depicts (82) attached structures. The proposed R-40 zoning district will
accommodate the proposed multi-family development with a gross density of 16.40 dwelling units per acre.
B. Development Agreement Modification (MDA): A modification to the existing development agreement (DA) is requested to
remove this property from the existing development agreement and to enter into a new development agreement with the
associated concept plan and elevations.
C. Preliminary Plat (PP):
The applicant proposes a new preliminary plat consisting of 22 residential building lots, one (1) commercial lot, and 5 common
area lots on 12.38 acres of land in the proposed C-C and R-40 zoning districts.
Access: Access to streets is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-3. The UDC (11-3A-3) requires
access to be taken from a local street when available. The applicant is requesting a Council waiver to allow for direct
access to W. McMillan Road. ACHD has approved the proposed access points.
The proposed plat depicts access for the multi-family portion of the project via W. Apgar Creek Lane (Private Street), at the
north boundary of the site.
Open Space: A minimum of 10% of the multi-family portion of the site is required to consist of qualified open space in accord
with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. A total of 1.56 acres of qualified open space is proposed consisting of half of the
landscape buffer along W. McMillan Road, stormwater detention facilities, a 50’ X 100’ area that is also called out as a
stormwater detention area and internal micropaths consistent with UDC standards.
Site Amenities: The applicant has proposed to include enclosed bike storage, a 50’ X 100’ playfield, a community garden with
6 rentable raised beds, walking trails and a playground facility with an adjacent sheltered seating area which would comply
with UDC requirements.
D. Conditional Use Permit(s) (CUP) Multi-family:
A CUP is requested for a multi-family development in the proposed R-40 zoning district as required by UDC Table 11-2A-2.
The proposed multi-family development consists of 82 dwelling units consisting of (12) townhouse buildings, each unit
containing 2-3-bedrooms.
Specific Use Standards: The specific use standards for multi-family developments listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 apply to
development of this site.
E. Conditional Use Permit(s) (CUP) Self-service Storage:
A second CUP is requested for a self-storage facility in the C-C zoning district as required by UDC Table 11-2B-2. The
storage units consist of 143,964 square feet of storage space on 5 acres of land.
Self-Service Storage Facilities: The specific use standards for the self-service storage facility listed in UDC 11-4-3-34 apply
to development of this site.
Self-Service Uses: The proposed use of the property is for a self-service storage facility. The project is required to comply
with UDC 11-3A-16.
Parking: The multi-family site plan depicts a total of 205 parking spaces – 94 in enclosed garages, 94 on parking pads in front
the garages, 4 ADA parking stalls, and 13 other stalls located throughout the development. This meets the requirements of the
UDC for off-street parking.
The storage portion of the project proposes three (3) parking stall is meets the requirements of UDC 11-3C-6B.
Certificate of Zoning Compliance: The applicant is required to obtain approval of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance
application for establishment of the new uses, in accord with UDC 11-5B-1.
Design Review: The applicant is required to submit an application for Design Review concurrent with the Certificate of Zoning
Compliance application in accord with UDC 11-5B-8. The site and building design is required to be generally consistent with
the elevations and site plan submitted with this application and the standards listed in UDC 11 -3A-19 and the City of Meridian
Architectural Standards Manual.
In summary, Staff recommends approval of the proposed RZ, CPAM, PP, CUP and MDA applications with the conditions
included in Exhibit B and approval of the proposed RZ application with a development agreement that includes the provisions
listed in Exhibit B of this report in accord with the findings contained in Exhibit D.
Commission Recommendation: The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items again on April
20. 2017 At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subject RZ, CPAM, CUP,
CUP, PP and MDA requests.
Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Shon Parks, James Doolin, John Carpenter
ii. In opposition:
iii. Commenting: Don Fleck, Dan Fisher, Bill Wade, Jamie Pollman, Rick Stillwell, Jennifer Blasko,
iv. Written testimony: Petition from neighbors (see public record); Bre Jones, Catherin Dehart, Cynthia
Romans, Daniel Shelton, David and Jennifer Blasko, Dorothy Pefferle, Janie Pollman, John Bellamy,
Laurie Bower, Maggie Collett, Marie Fullmer, Michael Caliendo, Miranda Randall, Pam Fiscus, Philip
Sosa, Rick Stillwell, Robert and Jennifer Drewett, Rod Ludlow, Rowland and Ann Stroll, Samuel
Hunter, Sandra Freeman, Sheryl and Jon Hopkins, Yori Dela Rosa, Diane McLain, Jennifer Griffith
v. Staff presenting application: Josh Beach
vi. Other staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons
b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony:
i. Concerns over the proposed number of parking spaces for the development;
ii. Concerns over the amount of traffic on Goddard Creek and how this project will increase the traffic;
iii. Concerns that the Comprehensive Plan amendment would be extremely damaging to surrounding
residents;
iv. Concern that the current residents purchased their homes on the knowledge that this are a would be
developed in accord with the current Comprehensive Plan;
v. Concerns that the project wasn’t noticed properly.
c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission:
i. Design of the open space and amenities;
ii. Conformance with the existing comprehensive plan and the existing development agreement;
iii. Concerns over the traffic in the area, with access, parking and location of the entrance to the multi-
family project;
iv. Concerns about the large number of apartments that would be in the area if this were approved;
d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
i. The Commission voted to deny the subject applications based on maintaining the integrity of the
current development agreement.
e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. None
Notes: ______
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Possible Motions:
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0007, as presented in the staff
report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0007, as presented during the
hearing on May 23, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0007 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following
reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance)
Item #9E: New Beginnings (H-2017-0026)
Application(s):
Annexation & Zoning
Short Plat
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 0.73 of an acre of land, zoned R-4, located at 780 E. Ustick
Road at the NEC of E. Ustick Road & N. Curt Drive.
Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: LDR
Summary of Request: The applicant has applied for annexation and zoning of 1.00 acre of land with an R-4 zoning district consistent
with the corresponding FLUM designation of LDR and the policies in the Comprehensive Plan as noted in the staff report.
A conceptual development plan was submitted that depicts how the site is proposed to develop with 2 building lots for 2 single-family
residential homes and a common driveway for access to the homes via Curt Drive; access via Ustick Rd. is prohibited.
A short plat is also proposed that consists of 2 building lots on 0.73 of an acre of land in a proposed R-4 zoning district. Access is
proposed for both lots via N. Curt Drive; direct access via Ustick Road is prohibited. A common driveway is proposed for access to both
lots.
A 25’ wide landscaped street buffer is required along Ustick Road and is required to be in a common lot maintained by a HOA. A
minimum 5’ wide detached sidewalk is required to be constructed along E. Ustick Rd. and a minimum 5’ wide attached sidewalk is
required along N. Curt Dr.
A conceptual building elevation of a single-story home was submitted that represents the future homes in this development.
As a provision of annexation, staff recommends a development agreement is required that includes provisions for access and
development consistent with the proposed conceptual development plan and building elevation.
Written Testimony: Chris Fuhrman, Applicant (in agreement w/staff report)
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Notes:
Possible Motions:
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0026, as presented in the staff
report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0026, as presented during the
hearing on May 23, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0026 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following
reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance)
Item #9F: Rockbury Subdivision (H-2017-0018)
Application(s):
Rezone
Preliminary Plat
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 25.06 acres of land, zoned R-15 and C-N, located at 6437 N.
Tree Haven Way.
Adjacent Land Use & Zoning:
North: Single-family residential homes in the Spurwing Green Subdivision, zoned R-8 and R-15
South: W. Chinden Blvd rural residential home and vacant residential and office property, zoned RUT in Ada County, R -8,
and L-O
East: Single-family residential homes in the Spurwing Green Subdivision, zoned R-8
West: Jayker Nursery, zoned R-15 and C-C
History: In 2006, the property received annexation (AZ-06-004) and conceptual approval to develop a mixed use community
consisting of single family residential, townhomes, multi-family and neighborhood commercial known as the Tree Farm.
Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: MDR
Summary of Request: Rezone (RZ): The applicant is requesting to rezone 25.06 acres of land from the R-15 (8.95 acres)
and C-N (16.11 acres) to R-15 (6.71 acres) and C-N (18.35 acres). The requested zoning is consistent with the MU-C and the
MDR land use designations.
Development Agreement Modification (MDA): This property is governed by three (3) development agreements. At the time
of annexation approval, the approved concept plan envisioned a mix of residential and neighborhood commercial uses for this
property. Now that specific development plans are proposed, the applicant is requesting all of the subject property
(approximately 25.06 acres) be excluded from the approved development agreements, so a new DA can be approved to
govern development of the property.
The applicant has submitted a new concept plan for Lot 2, Block 1. The submitted plan depicts a 73,000 square foot church
and associated site improvements to be developed in multiple phases. In general staff is supportive of the submitted concept
plan however, UDC 11-3A-19A.2. limits the amount of parking (50%) that is to be located between the building facades and
the abutting streets. If the applicant desires to keep the design as proposed, the applicant may request alternative compliance
(ALT) concurrent with the certificate of zoning compliance (CZC) application. NOTE: The applicant has incorporated
several design features (wider buffer, berms, plazas etc.) to mitigate the location of the parking area. Official approval
of these design concepts will be reviewed with a future ALT application. To ensure the C-N portion of the site develops
as proposed, staff recommends limiting Lot 2, Block 1 to the church use.
At this time, the R-15 portion of the site (Lot 3, Block 1) is not proposed to develop. To ensure housing diversity within the
development, Staff recommends the R-15 portion of the development be restricted to the aforementioned residential uses as
previously approved.
Preliminary Plat (PP) application: The applicant is proposing to plat one (1) residential lot, 2 common lots and one (1)
commercial lot on 23.56 acres of land in the R-15 and C-N zoning districts. The proposed C-N (Lot 2, Block 1) lot will consist
of the proposed church and associated site improvements.
The residential lot (Lot 3, Block 1) is being platted as a single 5.83 acre parcel and may be further subdivided in the future.
Dimensional Standards: Staff has reviewed the proposed plat for compliance with the applicable standards listed in UDC
Table 11-2A-7 and UDC 11-2B-3 for the R-15 and C-N zoning districts.
Access: At this time, the primary access into the development is N. Tree Farm Way, via Chinden Boulevard. This roadway will
eventually be extended through the adjacent property and intersect with Black Cat Road. In the interim, the primary access
from Chinden Boulevard is N. Tree Farm Way. UDC 11-3A-3 requires Council waiver for the two (2) access points
currently proposed to N. Tree Farm Way.
Variance: The applicant is proposing a right-in/right-out access to Chinden Boulevard. The proposed access is located on the
shared property line with the adjacent property owner. With the application submittal, the applicant submitted a letter from the
property owner granting use of his property for the access. If the variance is approved, the applicant and the adjacent property
owner will have to record a reciprocal cross access agreement for the shared access. The recorded cross access agreement
must be submitted with the certificate of zoning compliance for the development of the church property (Lot 2, Block 1) or the
first final plat application whichever is submitted first.
Conceptual Building Elevations: The applicant has submitted sample elevations to depict the design of the church proposed
for Lot 2, Block 1 of the subdivision. The church elevations incorporate glass, metal awnings, stucco, two variations in metal
siding, and translucent wall panels. In general, staff is supportive of the proposed building elevations. Further, refinement of
the church elevations proposed on Lot 2, Block 1 should comply with the submitted conceptual elevations and comply with the
design standards set forth in UDC 11-3A-19 and the Architectural Standards Manual.
Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review (DES): A CZC application is required to be submitted prior to
issuance of building permits. The applicant is required to obtain approval of a design review application for the proposed
structures and site design for the church site (Lot 2, Block 1). This application may be submitted c oncurrently with the CZC
application. The applicant must comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11 -3A-19 and the guidelines contained in the
Architectural Standards Manual.
Commission Recommendation: Approval w/conditions
The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on April 20, 2017. At the public hearing, the Commission
moved recommend approval of the project.
a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
ii. In favor: Scott Wonders, Scott Harrop
iii. In opposition: Robert Neufeldt
iv. Commenting: Robert Ebert, Tom Mcneill, Jamie Koozie, Robert Neufeldt, Denise LeFevre,
v. Written testimony: Robert Ebert
vi. Staff presenting application: Josh Beach
vii. Other staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons
b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony:
i. Traffic through the area, especially on Tree Farm Way has been increasing recently
ii. Concerns about the amount of traffic through the area, and for pedestrian safety.
iii. Discussion about how the addition of berms on the property would greatly reduce noise;
iv. Concerns about the lack of proposed parking for the residences and where the guests would park.
c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission:
i. Discussion about berms and what is required by the city vs. required by ITD.
ii. The potential for alternative compliance to reduce or remove the berms from along Chinden.
d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
ii. Modify condition 1.1.1C to read as follows: “The applicant shall coordinate with ITD on the amount of right-of-
way required adjacent to Chinden Boulevard in accord with the UDC 11-3H.”
iii. Modify condition 1.2.1B as follows: “The applicant shall coordinate with ITD on the amount of right-of-way
required adjacent to Chinden Boulevard in accord with the UDC 11-3H.”
iv. Add condition 1.2.4 to read as follows: “Prior to the City Council hearing, the applicant shall provide a horizontal
elevated landscape plan.”
v. Modify condition 1.1.1D to read as follows: “The existing tenants and businesses shall vacate the premises by
December 31, 2017.”
vi. Modify condition 1.2.2 to read as follows: “Construct a 35-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to Chinden
Boulevard as proposed. If the unimproved street right-of-way along W. Chinden Boulevard is 10 feet or greater
from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, and street widening project is not in the
transportation authority’s five year funded plan, the developer is required to maintain a 10-foot wide compacted
gravel shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder
with lawn or other vegetative ground cover in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.5. The applicant shall enter into a
license agreement for the landscape improvements within the ROW.
vii. Add condition 1.1.1F to read as follows: “The applicant shall either install the berms along Chinden Blvd. as
required by the UDC, or apply and receive approval for alternative compliance.”
f. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. Variance request for direct access to Chinden Blvd.
Notes:
Possible Motions:
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0018, as presented in the staff
report for the hearing date of May 23, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial to the City Council of File Number H-2017-
0018, as presented during the hearing on May 23, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2017-0018 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following
reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance)
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017
ITEM NUMBER: 9B
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0060
ITEM TITLE: Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. 5
Public Meeting for Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. 5 (H-2017-0060) by Schultz
Development Located 635 E. Vivid Sky Drive
1. Request: Vacate the Slope Easement on Lot 17, Block 12 of Reflection Ridge
Subdivision No. 5
MEETING NOTES
U✓ APPROIED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9C
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0059
ITEM TITLE: Gyro Shack at Paramount
Public Hearing for Gyro Shack at Paramount (H-2017-0059) by Jeff Likes Located 5038
N. Linder Road
1. Request: Council Review to Reduce the Required Twenty -Five (25) Foot Landscape
Buffer on the East Property Boundary
MEETING NOTES
CWe�eJ_ /\/0
u7APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
� 7-1
IDYAI�I:,,
May 23, 2017
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Josh Beach, Associate Planner
CC: Bill Nary, City Clerk
RE: Gyro Shack — H-2017-0059
503 8 N Linder Road
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
City Council Members:
Keith Bird Joe Borton
Luke Cavener Genesis Milam
Ty Palmer Anne Little Roberts
On April 6, 2017, the Planning & Zoning Commission approved a conditional use permit (H-2017-
0028) for a drive-through for a restaurant within 300 feet of another drive-through facility (Dutch
Bros and Sonic) and a residential use (Linder Springs Apartments).
The applicant requests City Council review of the following condition of approval associated with
the CUP: (the applicant's request is in italics)
• 1.3b -A 25 -foot wide landscape buffer to adjoining residential uses is required along the
east side of the site along the backage road adjacent to the apartments in Linder Springs
as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3, planted in accord with the standards listed in 11 -3B -
9C.
The applicantproposes to install a 6foot and a 17foot three inch landscape buffer at 19
feet and 84 feet off -set from the existing drive aisle. A solid fence and an approximately 5
foot landscape buffer were installed as part of the Linder Springs Apartment development
and are adjacent to the east side of the drive aisle.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Date: May 23, 2017 Item #
Project Number: H-2017-0059
Project Name:
9C
Gyro Shack at Paramount
Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish
to testify (Y/N)
jC-FF LtKEs APPI <«
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9D
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0007
ITEM TITLE: Goddard Creek
Public Hearing for Goddard Creek (H-2017-0007) by Brian Porter Located 2780 W.
McMillan Road;Rezone of 12.38;Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan;Conditional
Use Permit for a Self-Storage;Conditional Use Permit for a Multi -Family; Preliminary Plat
Approval Consisting of Twenty -Two (22) Building Lots,Amendment to an Existing
Development Agreement
MEETING NOTES
ca,j-,Jv- �0 ufie 6, ;b 17
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Z/
L,
Ll
v
L11
L/
v
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Date: May 23, 2017 Item #
Project Number:
Project Name:
H-2017-0007
Goddard Creek
ac
Please print your name
Do you wish
to testify (YIN)
i
0 ME 5— 54�,
Will
111 it T4 0111
W, V, Wkv ff M-M.N.W9. 6 Mr. W WE ME
M E E
C��
7 now-
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Date: May 23, 2017 Item #
Project Number:
Project Name:
H-2017-0007
Goddard Creek
MI
Please print your name
For
Against
Neutral
Do you wish
to testify (YIN)
A N�
U
V1 of S
�J
T)"
6
10 -blvd LS , rw < l
Y-11,
ves
as
)<
30nQ_�&a V'\ N � n k; ftc
-Pfti-e I Itiv
Xa
Rd,&k_ 0 hs, -c
I
Q0
Y
,S�JEV,5 EL,q 60 -S
x
fJ
)k��% ks m
CRALD i JE tvM
X,
�`
Y
1
Jon Seel
From: James Doolin <james@ldputah.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 12:55 PM
To: jcarpenter@to-engineers.com; Jon Seel
Subject: FW: ACSO Public Information Request - PIR 171333
Attachments: Kelly Creek Sub & Selway Sub CFS 2013-2016.pdf, Fulfer Falls #1 - #7 final plats.pdf;
Kelly Creek and Selway - Subdivision Analysis.xlsx
Gentlemen,
Attached are the dispatch call details for both the Kelly Creek Subdivision and the Selway Apartments. The Kelly Creek
Subdivision surrounds the Selway apartments, and includes the Fulfer Falls subdivisions #1- #7 (see attached Fulfer Falls
#1- #7 final plats).
Based on a quick analysis of number of dispatch calls per residence over a combined 4 -year period, there is not a
material difference between the apartments (0.92 calls per residence) and single-family homes (0.83 calls per
residence), see below anaylsis:
KELLY CREEK SUB & SELWAY APARTMENTS SUB -UNIT COUNT ANALYSIS
Subdivision Name
# of ResidentlaI Lots (Finial Plat) ` # of Multi -Family
'Fulfer Falls #1- Kelly Creek Sub.6
_ 4
Fulfer Falls #2- KeliyCreekSub.
47
Fulfer Falls #3 - Belly Creek Sub.
73.,
Fulfer Falls #4 - Kelly Creek Sub.
49
Fulfer Falls #5 - !telly Creek Sub.
46
Fulfer Falls #6 - Kelly Creek Sub.
55
Fulfer Fells #7 - Kelly Creek Sub.
44,
Selway Apartments
171
Total _
0.83' 1
379; 17.1
Please review the dispatch reports and above analysis, and let me know how you think we should use this data in our
City Council presentation.
Thanks,
Kelly Creek Subdivision
Selvray Apartments
Total Dispatch Cal Is 2013
1Cltl i
52 `
'total Dispatch Cal Is 2014
B7'
45'
Total Dispatch Calls 2015
48,
Total Dispatch Calls 2016
25;
15
Total Dispatch Calls 2013- 2016
314!
158
Total Dispatch Calls/Residence
0.83' 1
4.92,
Please review the dispatch reports and above analysis, and let me know how you think we should use this data in our
City Council presentation.
Thanks,
Goddard Creek
SELF STORAGE
MAY 23, 2017
MERIDIAN IDAHO
SITE OVERVIEW
SITE FEATURES
SITE ACCESS
12.25 acre Office Development:
◦1,340 = Estimated trips per day
7 acre Storage & 5.25 acre Residential:
◦705 = Estimated trips per day
Existing Development Agreement for Office
Proposed Mixed-Use: Storage / Residential
148,710 SF = Storage Building
1,384 SF = Office
2,076 SF = Manager’s unit and garage
STRUCTURES
STRUCTURES
STYLE
•TOWER ELEMENTS
WRAP CORNERS
•ARTICULATED
FACADES
•MATERIAL AND
COLOR VARIATIONS
•PEDESTRIAN SCALE
STYLE
STYLE
STYLE
Goddard Creek
SELF STORAGE
MAY 23, 2017
MERIDIAN IDAHO
GODDARD CREEK
SUBDIVISION PROJECT LOCATION
SURROUNDING
AREA
ADJACENT LAND USE
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
Trim & Band Color
COMMUNITY
OVERVIEW
Design Highlights
Strong Architecture Facades
Highly Planted Landscape Buffers
Walkable Connections
Well Placed Vehicular Access
Good Land Use Transition
1.36 Acres Of Open Space Trim & Band Color
4 -PLEX PLAN -
DENSITY
--Proposed 74 units on ±5-acres
--The proposed density is 14.75
units/acre.
-Requesting approval of R-15
zoning.
-1.36 acres of Open Space provided
(1.09 required).
4 -PLEX PLAN -
OPEN SPACE
4 -PLEX PLAN -
PARKING
--2.8 parking spaces provided per
unit. The City requires 2 spaces per
unit with at least one in a covered
carport or garaged (11-3C-6).
--33 guest parking spaces provided
--10 bicycle storage spaces
PARKING HIGHLIGHTS
Covered
Spaces
Surface
Spaces
Spaces
Per Unit
Bicycle
Required 1 per Unit
74
1 per Unit
74
2 1 per 25
vehicular stalls
9
Proposed 86 119
(30 guest+ 3
ADA,
86 driveway)
2.84 10
4 -PLEX PLAN –
ROADS
o 4-Plex entrance located 250’ west of
Apgar Creek Ln/Goddard Creek Way
to eliminate potential stacking of
vehicles along Apgar Creek Lane.
o Apgar Creek Lane will be widened 5’
o McMillan Rd Right-of-way will be
dedicated to ACHD for future
improvements.
o ACHD report states McMillan (Linder to
Ten Mile) is in the CIP to be widened to
3 lanes.
PICTURE
250’ (c.l. to curb)
Road widened
4 -PLEX PLAN –
TRAFFIC
o Traffic study prepared by Daniel
Thompson on May 16, 2017
PICTURE
4 -PLEX PLAN -
AMENITIES
5 Amenities (City requires 3 Amenities For
Developments Between 20 And 75 Units)
Quality of Life Category
•Enclosed Bike Storage
Recreation Category
•Walking Trails
•Children’s Play Structure
Open Space Category
•Open Grassy Area of 50’x100’
•Community Garden
•Shelter/Plaza
Storm
Drainage in
subsurface
seepage beds
4 -PLEX PLAN -
AMENITIES
Community Garden
20’x28’ Fenced & Gated
(6) -4’x8’ Plots
Plaza
17’x17’ Paver Plaza
12’x12’ Picnic Shelter
4 -PLEX RENDERINGS
2,3,3,2 STORY BLDS
4 -PLEX RENDERINGS
2,3,3,2 STORY BLDS
PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
4 -PLEX RENDERINGS
3 ,3,3,3 STORY BLDS
4 -PLEX RENDERINGS
3 ,3,3,3 STORY BLDS
PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
SITE PLAN –
ALTERNATE ENTRY
o Shared entry off of McMillan Rd
o No access to Apgar Creek Ln or N. Goddard Creek Way
PICTURE
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017
ITEM TITLE: New Beginnings
ITEM NUMBER: 9E
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0026
Public Hearing for New Beginnings (H-2017-0026) by Chris Fuhrman Located 780 E.
Ustick Road
1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 1.00 Acre of Land with an R-4 Zoning
DistrictRequest: Short Plat Approval Consisting of Two (2) Building Lots on 0.73 of an Acre
of Land
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROIED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Date: May 23, 2017 Item #
Project Number: H-2017-0026
Project Name: New Beginnings
Please print your name
,:1
9E
For Against Neutral Do you wish
to testifv (Y/N)
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: Mav 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9F
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0018
ITEM TITLE: Rockbury Subdivision
FUNIC Hearing Tor KOCKOury5ubdivision - - y oc ar or Churcri, Inc.
Located 6437 N. Tree Haven Way
1. Request: Rezone of 25.06 Acres of Land from R-15 (8.95 Acres) and C -N (16.11 Acres)
to R-15 (6.71 Acres) and C -N (18.35 Acres) Zoning Districts
2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Two (2) Common Lots, One (1)
Commercial Lot and One (1) Multi -Family Lot on 23.56 Acres of Land in the Proposed R-
15 and C -N Zoning Districts
3. Request: Variance to Allow a Limited Access (Right-In/Right-Out) Through a Shared
F)rivPwrw nntn C'hinriPn Rnl ilPvryrrl
MEETING NOTES
uy APPMED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
I&
i
rAr
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Date: May 23, 2017 Item # 9F
Project Number: H-2017-0018
Project Name: Rockbury Subdivision
P eas print your name
For
Against
Neutral
Do you wish
to testify (Y/N)
�vrU
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 10A1
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: Enviro-Care
Approval of Award of RFP and Agreement to Enviro-Care for the "PERFORATED PLATE
SCREENS EQUIPMENT" for the Headworks Expansion project for a Not -To -Exceed
amount of $522,400.00. This agreement is being funded in two fiscal years: 2017 (Oct.
2016 - Sept. 2017) $52,240.00; 2018 (Oct. 2017 - Sept. 2018) $470,160.00.
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Page 1
Memo
To: C.J. Coles, City Clerk,
From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager
CC: Troy Thrall, Clint Dolsby
Date: 5/11/2017
Re: May 23 rd City Council Meeting Agenda Item
The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the
May 23 rd City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration.
Approval of Award of RFP and Agreement to Enviro-Care for the “PERFORATED
PLATE SCREENS EQUIPMENT” for the Headworks Expansion project for a Not-To-
Exceed amount of $522,400.00. This agreement is being funded in two fiscal years,
2017 (Oct. 2016 – Sept. 2017) $52,240.00, 2018 (Oct. 2017 – Sept. 2018)
$470,160.00.
Recommended Council Action: Award of RFP and Approval of Agreement to
Enviro-Care for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $522,400.00.
Thank you for your consideration.
City of Meridian
Purchasing Dept.
City of Meridian
RFP NUMBER: PW-1705-10044
DUE DATE & TIME: November 9, 2016
VENDOR SELECTION: (in order)Points Awarded
1 Enviro-Care 88.26
2 Kusters Zima Corporation 80.15
3 JWC Environmental, LLC 74.92
4 Huber Technology, Inc 64.55
5
6
7
Date Posted: 1-20-2016
PERFORATED PLATE SCREENS EQUIPMENT FOR THE WRRF
HEADWORKS EXPANSION PROJECT
SELECTION
AGREEMENT FOR THE SUPPLY OF
PERFORATED PLATE SCREENS EQUIPMENT FOR THE
WRRF HEADWORKS EXPANSION PROJECT
PROJECT #100'14.F
THIS AGREEMENT FOR EQUIPMENT / SUPPLIES PROCUREMENT is made
this 23'd day of May, 2017, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a
municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of ldaho, hereinafter
referred to as "C|TY", 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642, and Enviro-
Care, hereinafter referred to as "SUPPL|ER", whose business address is '1570 St. Paul
Ave., Gurnee, lL 60031.
INTRODUCTION
WHEREAS, the SUPPLIER is specially trained, experienced and
competent to provide and has agreed to provide such equipment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants,
terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Equipment / Supply Specifications & Requirements:
1.1 SUPPLIER shall supply the equipment, supplies and services to the
City upon execution of this Agreement and receipt of the City's written notice
to proceed, all items, and comply in all respects, as specified in the Request
for Proposals titled "Perforated Plate Screens Equipment for The WRRF
Headworks Expansion Project" and suppliers proposal dated November 7,
2016, which by this reference are incorporated herein, together with all
addendums issued.
1.2 The SUPPLIER shall provide all equipment and services under this
Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by
applicable federal, state and city laws, ordinances, regulations and
resolutions and the UCC. The SUPPLIER represents and warrants that it will
perform its work in accordance with generally accepted industry standards
and practices for the profession or professions that are used in performance
of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of performance of this
PERFORATED PLATE SCREENS EQUIPMENT
Project No. 10044. F
page 1 of 11
Whereas, the City has a need for PERFORATED PLATE SCREENS
EQUIPMENT ; and
Agreement. Delivery shall take place wilhin g weeks of approval ofsubmittals to the address below:
City of Meridian, Wastewater Treatment Facility
Attn: Laurelei McVey
3401 N. Ten Mile Rd.
Meridian, lD 83646
2. Consideration
PERFORATED PLATE SCBEENS EOUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.F
2.1 The SUPPLIER shall be compensated on a Fixed price basis asprovided in Attachment B "payment Schedule" attached nereto anO Uyre-ference made a part hereof, for the Not-To-Exceed amount oi
$522,400.00.
2.2 The SUPpLIER shall provide the City with a detailed Invoice upondelivery of all equipment and supplies, whichihe City will pay within 30 diysof receipt of a correct invoice and approval by the City erojeci l,lanager. Thecity will not wirhhord any Federar oi state income tixesbr Sociar-securityTax Jrom any payment made by City to SUppLIER under the terms andconditions of this Agreement. payment of all taxes and other assessmentson such sums is the sole responsibility of SUppLlER.
2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, SUppLIER shall notbe entifled to receive from the city any additional consideration,compensation, salary, wages, or other type of remuneration for servicesrendered under this Agreement.,. including , but not limited to, meals, lodging,
tran-sportation, drawings, renderings or mockups. Specifically, SuppilEH
shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreemeni to consideration in the tormof overtime, health insurance benefits, retirement benefits, paid holidays orother paid leaves of absence of any type or kind whatsoever.
Fundlng:
Funding for tlp q{o]ggt wiil be sptit between three fiscat years, 2017 (Oct.
2016 - Sept. 2017) 952,240.00, 2018 (Oct. 2017 - Sept. zOr a) E+zO, r OO.Od.
The amounls beyond the 2017 fiscal year have not yei been appropriated bythe City.. Contractor may not incur more than thl amount
'speiified
andapproved for a specific fiscal year. Any and all additional expendituresbeyond the cunent fiscal year must b6 approved by Cify Ciuncil indmemorialized by a written amendment or change ordeito this Agreemenl.
3
page 2 of 11
4. Term:
PEBFORATEO PLATE SCREENS EOUIPMENT
Project No. 100214.F
4.1 . This agreement shall become effectlve upon execution by bothparties, and shall expire upon (a) completion of the agreed upon wor( or (b)
unless sooner terminated as provided below or unresi some other method o;
time of termination is listed in Attachment A.
4.2 Should SUPPLIER delault in the performance of this Agreement or
mate-rially breach any of ils provisions, City, at City,s option, miy terminate
this Agreement by giving written notification to SUppligR.
4.3. Should Cily fait to pay SUppLIER all or any part of the compensation
set forth in Attachment B of this Agreement on th-e date due, SUp'pUten, afthe SUPPLIER's option, may terminate this Agreement if the fairure is notremedied by the City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due.
Termination:
lf, through any cause, SUppLlER, its officers, employees, or agents fails totylfj!., " timety and proper manner its obligations under this-Agreement,
violates any of the covenants, agreemenls, oi stipulations of this A!reement,falsifies any record or document required to be prepared u-nder thisagreemenl, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any othei ait of misconduct inthe performance of this contract, or if the City Council determines thaltermination of this Agreement is in the best interest of crry, the crry shafl
lhejg.rlp_gn !1ve the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice
to SUPPLIEB of such termination and specifying tne efeitive-oate thereof atleast fifteen (15) days before the effective date-of such termination.
Nolwithstanding the above, suppLrER shalr not be rerieved of riabirity to theCITY for damages sustained by the ClTy by virtue of any breach'of this
1.9.8:ryU by SUPPL|ER, and the CtTy miy withhotd any paymenrs roSUPPLIER for the purposes of set-off untir such time as the exact amount ofdamages due the crrY from suppLrER is determined. Tnis provision shail
survive the termination of lhis agreement and shall not relieve SUppLIER ofits liability to the CtTy for damages.
lndependent SUPPLIER:
6.1 ln all matters pertaining to this agreement, SUPPLIER shall be actingas an independent SUPPLIER, and neither SUPPLIER nor any officeiemployee or agent ot SUppLIER will be deemed an emptoyee bt CtfV.
Except as expressly provided in Attachment A, SUppLtER haj no iutnoriiyor responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City anltherefore has no authority to bind or incur any obrigation on behart of the
5
6
page 3 of 11
7
City. The selection and designation of the personnel of the CITY in theperformance of this agreement shall be madd by the ClTy.
I ? SUPPLIER, its agents, officers, and employees are and at ail timesduring the term of thisAgreement sharr represeni and conduct themserves aiindependent SUPPLIERs and not as employees of the City.
6.3 SUPPLIER shail determine the method, details and means ofperforming the work and services to be provided by SUppLIER under thisAgreement. SUPPLIER shalt be responsibte to City orfy to, inerequirements and results specified in tiris Agreement ind, except as
:l^?rg_.:! plgriged in rhis Agreement, shail nor b6 subiecred to City,s conrrotwrrn respect to the physical action or activities of suppllER in fuifillment ofthis Agreement. lf in the perlormance of this Agreement any third persons
are.employed by SUppLlER, such persons shaii be entirely inO exifusi,efyunder the direction and supervision and control of the SUppLlER.
lndemnlflcatlon and lnsurance:
SUPPLIER shall indemnify and save and hord harmress crry from and rorany and all losses, claims, actions,. judgments for damages, or injury lopersons or property and losses and expenses and otheicosts inituOinglitigation costs and attorney's fees, aribing out of, resulting from, or iiconneclion with the performance of this Agreement by the S-Uppf_f Ln, irsservants, agents, otficers, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not
9au:ed.by_or arising oul of the tortuoul conduct of ClTy or its employees.suPPLlER.shall maintain, and specificaily agrees that it wirr riraintain,throughout the term of this Agreement, riabirity in'surance, in which the ciTvshall be named an additionar insured in the minimum amounts as foflow:General Liability one Miilion Doilars (gl ,000,000) per incidenl or oc"urrence,Automobile Liability lnsuranr.e One Million Oottais ($t ,000,000) per incideni
or occurrence and workers' compensation lnsurance, in the siaiutory limits
as required by law.. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation
of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY; and if ClTybecomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance rimits, hereinprovided, SUPPLIER covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold
harmless CITY from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments fordamages or injury to persons or property and other costs, inctu'Oin-g litigation
costs and anorneys' fees, arising out ol, resulting from , or in connection withthe perlormance ol this Agreement by the SUppLiER or SUppLIER's
ottrcers, employs, agents, representatives or subSUppLlERs and resulting in
or attributable to personal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangi-bte
or intangible property, inctuding use of. SUppLIER shalt provide Ctry ilitn a
Certilicate of lnsurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing SUppLlEh;S
compliance with the requiremenls of this paragraph and filJsuch proof of
insurance with the CtTy at least ten (10) days prior to the date SUirpLlER
PERFORATED PLATE SCREENS EOUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.F
page 4 of I1
begins performance of it's obligations under this Agreement. ln the evenl theinsurance minimums are changed, SUPPLIER ahall immediately submitproof of compliance with the changed limits. Evidence of ail insurance shallbe submitted_-to_the City purchasing Agent with a copy to Meridian CityAccounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldah;-ffi642.
7..2 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must bedeclared in writing and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either:
the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles, self-insured retenrions
or named insureds; or the SUPPLIER shall provide a bond, cash or letter of
credit .guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claimadministration and detense expenses.
7 .3 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, SUppLIER's lnsurance
co.verage shall be primary insurance regarding the city's elecled officers,ofticials, employees and vorunteers. 1ny insurance or serf-insurance
maintained by the City or the City's elected oificers, officials, employees andvolunteers shall be excess of the sUppllER's insurance and shail notcontribute with SUPPLIER'S insurance except as lo the extent of City,s
negligence.
The SUPPLIEB's insurance shall apply separately to each insured againstwhom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits;f theinsurer's liability.
7..4 . All insurance coverages for Suppliers subs shall be subject to all ofthe insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein.
7.5 The rimits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liabirity ofthe Supplier and Supplier's agents, representatives, employees orsubcontractors.
7.6 The limits of insurance described herein shail not rimit the riabirity olthe Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives, employees orsubcontractors.
o Bonds: Payment, Warranty and performance Bonds are required atcontract signing.
Warranty: ln addition to any warranly required in the specificalions, allequipment, coatings, valves, controls, and other component's provided under
this. agreement shall be guaranteed for three (3) yiars against defects inworkmanship and malerials from the notice of acceptance.
PERFORATED PLATE SCREENS EOUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.F
page 5 of 11
9.
'10 Notlces: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties
hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shill be in writing inObedeemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, 6ertilied,return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
City of Meridian
Purchasing Manager
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, tdaho 83642
Ph. (208) 489-0417
Email: kwa tts@me ridiancitv orq
Enviro-Care
: Phil Th n P d
1570 St. PaU lAvenue
Gurn e. lllinois.0031
Ph 815) 636 -8306 -224\ 302-0301 (d irect)
e-m il: pthom n@e nviro-care com
Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph bygiving written notice of such change to the other in tne mannJ n'ereinprovided.
11. Attorney Fees: shourd any ritigation be commenced between the parties
hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevairing party shari oe Lnliiieo, inaddition to any other rerief as may be granted, to dourt iosts and r""ron"ot"
attorneys' fees. as.derermined by a court of competent jurisdiction. ihisprovision shail be deemed to be a separate contraci betwe'en the farties andsharr survive any defaurt, termination or forfeiture or tnis ngreem!;i. -- -
12. Trme rs ot the .Essence: The parties hereto acknowredge and agree lhattime is striclly of the Fssence wilh respect to eacn anO eve"[ ierm, EonOiiionand provision hereof, and that the fairure to timery perform
"r,y
oi ir,"obrigations hereunder shail constitute a breach or, ano I aeiaurt ,rter, tt,i.Agreement by the party so failing to perform.
l3 Assrgnment: rt is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto,thar SUppLtEB. sha, not havelhe right to assign, t'.n&"r, fi,potf,"."i. o,sell any of its rights.under this Agreement exclpt upon the [rior "rpL.,written consent of ClTy.
14. Drscrrmrnatron. prohrbited: rn performing the work reguired herein,suppLrER sha, not unlawfurty disiriminate ii vioratio" oi"rii.o-o"i,it"r"or local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basi;
"i A;,;;6r,religion, sex, national origin or incestry,'age or disability.
PEBFORATED PLATE SCREENS EQUIPMENT
Project No. r ooa+.r - E\JUrrMErY I - page 6 of 1 1
15. Reports and lnrormation:
'r5. r Ar such times and in such forms as the crry may require, there shabe furnished to the crry such starements, records, reports, data andinformation as the crry may request pertaining to matters covered by thisAgreement.
15.2 SUPPLIER shall maintain all writings, documents and recordsprepared or compired in connecrion with the performance of this Agreement
for a minimum.of four (4) years from the termination or comptetiorioiinis orAgreement. This.incrudes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, ptroio static,photographic and every other means ot rec6ioing upin any i'"ngibie ihing,any form of communication or representation -iniruding'
rette-rs, w;rol,pictures, sounds or symbols or any combination thereof.
16. Audits and rnspecrions: Qubject to appricabre raws respecting theprotection of privacy and the city's requirement to compry wit'h the idaho
Public Records Act, at any time during normar business nours and ". ort"n
as the crry may deem necessary, there shail be made avairabre to tn, cryfor examinalion ail of sUppLlER's records with respect to ait ,"tterscovered by this Agreement. suppLrEH shail permit the crry ro iroit,examine, and make excerprs or transcripts from such records, ano to mixeaudits of aI contracts, invoices, mareriars, payrofls, records of p"isonner,
conditions of emproyment and other data reiating to ail matters dovered bythis Agreement.
17. Pubrication, Reproduction and use o, Materiar: No materiar produced in
whore or in part u.nder lhis Agreement shail be subject to copyrigni in it,eunited states or in any orher country. The crry inart navd irn7"irii"i"oauthority to publish, disclose and othe*ise use, in whole or in part, inyreports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement.
18. Compliance 1i!fr._!ws: ln performing the scope of work requiredhereunder, sUppLrER shail compry with aflippricabre'raws, oroinancei, anocodes of Federal, State, and local governments.
19. C_langes: The ClTy may, from time to time, request chanoes in the Scooeof work to be performed hereunder. Such chani]es, incruaing any inciealeor decrease in the amount of SUppLIER,S iompensatiin, ,rni.n ir"mutuaily agreed upon by and between the clry ano suppt-tER, shail beincorporated in wrinen amendments which shalr be executed with ihe sameformalitles as this Agreement.
20. construcfion and severabllity: lf any part of this Agreement is held to beinvalid or unenrorceabre, such holding wiil not ;ffect the varidity or
PERFoRATED PLATE SCBEENS EoutpMENT _ page 7 of 1iProject No. '10044.F
enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of
the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion,
21. Waiver of Default: Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shall
not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of
any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any
other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modification
of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided
above.
22. Advice of Attorney: Each party warrants and represents that in executing
this Agreement, It has received independent legal advice from its attorney's
or the opportunity to seek such advice.
23. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral
of written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous
herewith.
24. Order of Precedence: The order or precedence shall be this contract
agreement, the Request for Proposals, Enviro-Cares' proposal dated
November 7, 2016.
25, Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the
ordinances of the City of Meridian,
26. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding
until approved by the City of Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN ENVIRO-CARE
TAMM d EE -R --D, MAYOR
Dated: S/ 2Y X17
Approved by City Council:__ O3/ ;bl7_
Attest:
COLE$7 CITY CLERK
PERFORATED PLATE
Project No. 10044,E
S4
city of
tai WQU 1ANt
4PME110
BY: PHIL IP A. THOMPSON,
PRESIDENT
Dated: February 0.2 2017
Approved as to Form
CITY ATTORNEY
page 8 of 11
BYBY
Purchasing
Keith
Dated: 2 .Z
PEBFOBATEO PLATE SCREENS EOUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.F
Dated: 5 L
Approval
Engineer
page I of 11
Attachment A
SCOPE OF WORK
REFER TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PW.1705-10044, ALL ADDENDUMS,
ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the Request for proposats package
#PW-1 705-10044, written proposal by Phillip A. Thompson dated Novembe r 7, 2016,
PEBFOBATED PLATE SCREENS EQUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.F page 10 of 1 1
Atlachment B
MILESTONE / PAYMENTSCHEDULE
A -- _Total and complele compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed
$522,400.00.
TASK DESCRIPTION
Council
DATE
(Dependsnt on PAYMENT
A.Written Approval of Submittals 5t29t2017 $52,240.00
B Delivery
October 1 2017
No Earlier than
$365,680.00
c Progress Payment
120 Days after
rgcoipt ot $52,240.00
D Startup, Completion of Training and Finat Acceptance No lhan
June 201 $52,240.00
CONTRACT TOTAL.$522J100-00
PEHFOBATED PLATE SCFEENS EOUIPMENT
Poecl No. 10044,F page 11of 11
MILESTONE DATES/PRICING SCHEDULE
CitY Of ualidian
Detailed Stalement of Revenues and Expendilures - Rev and Exp Report
3590 - l{li Conatruction P!oj6ct6
60 - Bnte4rrile EUnd
Fron 10/1/2016 Throuqh 9/30/2017
Keith
Percent of
Budget
Remaining
Budget with Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Capital Outlay
Headworks Improvements
fleadworks/Eine Screens
WRRE Headworks Capacity
Expansion - Design
WRRF Grit Removaf
Equipment for the
Headv,,orks Expansion Proj
10044.G
10601.H
96164
10044
10044.d
6,339,423.66
707,458.50
0. 00
70?,458.50
6,339,O23.66
0. 00
100.00t
0. 00t
82,413.40
0 .00
82tAt3.AA
292,980 .AO
0.00
(292,984 -04)WRRF Cap. Exp. Process
Controf Softrare
Integration
Total Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
_l , r28,555.16
7,128,555.16
1,082,511.50 046 043 .66
1 ae2 511.50 6,046,443 .66
Date.5/12/7',1 01 .4 0:21 PM
84.81t--!3-i1!
Date 4/9/201.s
Fu nd 60
Construction
Project Name:
Department
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CONTRACT/AGENDA REQUEST CHECKLIST
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT PW - ENGR
3590 GL Account:96164 Project s 10044.F
PSA Task Order
Perforated Plate Screens Equipment for the Headworks Expansion Project
Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer
Troy Thrall Department Representative
Enviro-Ca re
BudSet Available (Attach Repon):Split
Willthe project cross fiscal years?
Contrad Amounti ss22,400.00
Yes x NO
FY Budget: 17 & 18 Enhancement #
Other:
Grant f:
CONTRACT CHECKTIST
Low Bldder _
{Bid Results Attached) _
TypicalAward Yes X No
Highest Rated
(Ratings Attached)
BASIS OF AWARD
x Master Agreement
(category)X
tf no-ph.r" ,t"t" .ir.il-t.,l."s and conclusion
10 Day Waiting Period Complete
PW License d
Corporation Status
lnsurance Certificates Received (Date)
Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date)
Builders Risk lns. Req'd: Yes
(Only applicabal€ lor protects above Sl,00O,OOO)
Current? (attach print out) n/a
Rating: N/A
Febtrary 2,2077 Rating: A++
lf yes. has policy been purchased? n/a
Yes oate Award Posted lanuary 20, 2077
N/A
xNO
Date lssued
Approved by Council
WH5 submitted
NTP Date:
Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda
lssue Purchase Order No
May 72,2017
lssue Notice of Award: Date
lonlyfor non Publa( works P.oject)
Project Manager:
Budget lnformation:
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 1 QA2
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: WASHER COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT
Approval of Award of RFP and Agreement to JWC Environmental for the "WASHER
COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT" for the Headworks Expansion project for a Not -To -Exceed
amount of $309,750.00. This agreement is being funded in two fiscal years: 2018 (Oct.
2017 - Sept. 2018) $278,775.00; 2019 (Oct. 2018 - Sept. 2019) $30,975.00.
MEETING NOTES
rte✓ APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Page 1
Memo
To: C.J. Coles, City Clerk,
From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager
CC: Troy Thrall, Clint Dolsby
Date: 5/11/2017
Re: May 23 rd City Council Meeting Agenda Item
The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the
May 23 rd City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration.
Approval of Award of RFP and Agreement to JWC Environmental for the “WASHER
COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT” for the Headworks Expansion project for a Not-To-
Exceed amount of $309,750.00. This agreement is being funded in two fiscal years,
2018 (Oct. 2017 – Sept. 2018) $278,775.00, 2019 (Oct. 2018 – Sept. 2019)
$30,975.00.
Recommended Council Action: Award of RFP and Approval of Agreement to
JWC Environmental for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $309,750.00.
Thank you for your consideration.
City of Meridian
Purchasing Dept.
City of Meridian
RFP NUMBER: PW-1704-10044
DUE DATE & TIME: November 10, 2016
VENDOR SELECTION: (in order)
Avg.
Points
1 JWC Environmental, LLC
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date Posted:
Washer/Compactor for WRRF Headworks
SELECTION
AGREEMENT FOR THE SUPPLY OF
WASHER COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT FOR THE
WRRF HEADWORKS EXPANSION PROJECT
PROJECT #10044.H
THIS AGREEMENT FOR EQUIPMENT / SUPPLIES PROCUREMENT is made
this 23'd day of Mav, 2017 , and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a
municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of ldaho, hereinafter
referred to as "ClTY", 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642, and JWC
Environmental, hereinafter referred to as "SUPPL|ER", whose business address is 2850
S. Red Hill Ave., Suite 125, Santa Ana, CA 92705.
INTRODUCTION
Whereas, the City has a need for WASHER C OMP A CTOR EQUIPMENT
, and
WHEREAS, the SUPPLIER is specially trained, experienced and
competent to provide and has agreed to provide such equipment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants,
terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Equipment / Supply Specifications & Requirements:
1.1 SUPPLIER shall supply the equipment, supplies and services to the
City upon execution of this Agreement and receipt of the City's written notice
to proceed, all items, and comply in all respects, as specified in the Request
for Proposals titled "Perforated Plate Screens Equipment for The WRRF
Headworks Expansion Project" and suppliers proposal dated November 8,
2016, which by this reference are incorporated herein, together with all
addendums issued.
1.2 The SUPPLIER shall provide all equipment and services under this
Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by
applicable federal, state and city laws, ordinances, regulations and
resolutions and the UCC. The SUPPLIER represents and warrants that it will
perform its work in accordance with generally accepted industry standards
and practices forthe profession or professions that are used in performance
of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of performance of this
WASHER COI\4PACTOR EQUIPMENT
Project No '10044 H
page 1 of 10
Agreement. Delivery shall take place within 8 weeks of approval of
submittals to the address below:
City of Meridian, Wastewater Treatment Facility
Attn: Laurelei McVey
3401 N. Ten Mile Rd.
Meridian, lD 83646
2.1 The SUPPLIER shall be compensated on a Fixed Price basis as
provided in Attachment B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by
reference made a part hereof, for the NolTo-Exceed amount of
$309,750.00.
2.2 The SUPPLIER shall provide the City with a detailed invoice upon
delivery of all equipment and supplies, which the City will pay within 30 days
of receipt of a correct invoice and approval bythe City Project Manager. The
City will not withhold any Federal or State income taxes or Social Security
Tax from any payment made by City to SUPPLIER under the terms and
conditions of this Agreement. Payment of all taxes and other assessments
on such sums is the sole responsibility of SUPPLIER.
2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, SUPPLIER shall not
be entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration,
compensation, salary, wages, or other type of remuneration for services
rendered underthis Agreement., including , but not limited to, meals, lodging,
transportation, drawings, renderings or mockups. Specifically, SUPPLIER
shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement to consideration in the form
of overtime, health insurance benefits, retirement benefits, paid holidays or
other paid leaves of absence of any type or kind whatsoever.
3. Funding:
Funding for this project will be split between two fiscal years, 2018 (Oct.2017
- Sept. 2018) $278,775.00 and 2019 (Oct. 2018 - Sept. 2019) $30,975.00.
The amounts beyond the 2017 fiscal year have not yet been appropriated by
the City. Contractor may not incur more than the amount specified and
approved for a specific fiscal year. Any and all additional expenditures
beyond the current fiscal year must be approved by City Council and
memorialized by a written amendment or change order to this Agreement.
4. Term:
4.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both
parties, and shall expire upon (a) completion of the agreed upon work, or (b)
WASHER COMPACTOR EOUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.H
2. Consideration
page 2 of 10
unless sooner terminated as provided below or unless some other method or
time of termination is listed in Attachment A.
4.2 Should SUPPLIER default in the performance of this Agreement or
materially breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate
this Agreement by giving written notification to SUPPLIER.
4.3 Should City fail to pay SUPPLIER all or any part of the compensation
set forth in Attachment B of this Agreement on the date due, SUPPLIER, at
the SUPPLIER's option, may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not
remedied by the City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due.
5. Termination:
lf, through any cause, SUPPLIER, its officers, employees, or agents fails to
fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement,
violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement,
falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this
agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in
the performance of this contract, or if the City Council determines that
termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall
thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice
to SUPPLIER of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at
least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination.
Notwithstanding the above, SUPPLIER shall not be relieved of liability to the
CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this
Agreement by SUPPLIER, and the CITY may withhold any payments to
SUPPLIER forthe purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of
damages due the CITY from SUPPLIER is determined. This provision shall
survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve SUPPLIER of
its liability to the CITY for damages.
6. lndependent SUPPLIER:
6.2 SUPPLIER, its agents, officers, and employees are and at all times
during the term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as
independent SUPPLIERs and not as employees of the City.
WASHER coMpACToR EoutpMENT - page 3 of 10
Project No. 10044.H
6.1 ln all matters pertaining to this agreement, SUPPLIER shall be acting
as an independent SUPPLIER, and neither SUPPLIER nor any officer,
employee or agent of SUPPLIER will be deemed an employee of CITY.
Except as expressly provided in Attachment A, SUPPLIER has no authority
or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City and
therefore has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the
City. The selection and designation of the personnel of the CITY in the
performance of this agreement shall be made by the CITY.
6.3 SUPPLIER shall determine the method, details and means of
performing the work and services to be provided by SUPPLIER under this
Agreement. SUPPLIER shall be responsible to City only for the
requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as
expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's control
with respect to the physical action or activities of SUPPLIER in fulfillment of
this Agreement. lf in the performance of this Agreement any third persons
are employed by SUPPLIER, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively
under the direction and supervision and control of the SUPPLIER.
7. lndemnification and lnsurance:
SUPPLIER shall indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY from and for
any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to
persons or property and losses and expenses and other costs including
litigation costs and attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in
connection with the performance of this Agreement by the SUPPLIER, its
servants, agents, officers, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not
caused by or arising out of the tortuous conduct of CITY or its employees.
SUPPLIER shall maintain, and specifically agrees that it will maintain,
throughout the term of this Agreement, liability insurance, in which the CITY
shall be named an additional insured in the minimum amounts as follow:
General Liability One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident or occurrence,
Automobile Liability lnsurance One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident
or occurrence and Workers' Compensation lnsurance, in the statutory limits
as required by law.. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation
of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY; and if CITY
becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein
provided, SUPPLIER covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold
harmless CITY from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for
damages or injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation
costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of, resulting from , or in connection with
the performance of this Agreement by the SUPPLIER or SUPPLIER's
officers, employs, agents, representatives or subSUPPLlERs and resulting in
or attributable to personal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible
or intangible property, including use of. SUPPLIER shall provide CITY with a
Certificate of lnsurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing SUPPLIER'S
compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of
insurance with the CITY at least ten (10) days prior to the date SUPPLIER
begins performance of it's obligations under this Agreement. ln the event the
insurance minimums are changed, SUPPLIER shall immediately submit
proof of compliance with the changed limits. Evidence of all insurance shall
be submitted to the City Purchasing Agent with a copy to Meridian City
Accounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642.
WASHER COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT
Project No. 10044. H
page 4 of 10
8
I
7.2 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be
declared in writing and approved bythe City. Atthe option of the City, either:
the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles, self-insured retentions
or named insureds; or the SUPPLIER shall provide a bond, cash or letter of
credit guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim
administration and defense expenses.
7.3 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, SUPPLIER's lnsurance
coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City's elected officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance
maintained by the City or the City's elected officers, officials, employees and
volunteers shall be excess of the SUPPLIER's insurance and shall not
contribute with SUPPLIER's insurance except as to the extent of City's
negligence.
The SUPPLIER's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability.
7.4 All insurance coverages for Suppliers subs shall be subject to all of
the insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein.
7 .5 ln no event shall the Supplier be liable for lost profits or other special,
indirect or consequential damages. Supplier's lndemnity obligations shall be
limited to the limits of the Seller's insurance where Supplier's insurance is
applicable. Where Supplier's insurance is not applicable, the Supplieis
aggregate total liability shall not exceed the purchase order amount."
Bonds: Payment, Warranty and Performance Bonds are not required.
Warranty: ln addition to any warranty required in the specifications, all
equipment, coatings, valves, controls, and other components provided under
this agreement shall be guaranteed for two (2) years against defects in
workmanship and materials from the notice of acceptance.
page 5 of 10
10. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties
hereto, unless othenrvise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be
deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified,
return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
City of Meridian
Purchasing Manager
33 E. BroadwayAvenue
Meridian, ldaho 83642
Ph. (208) 489-0417
Email: kwatts@meridiancitv.orq
WASHER COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.H
Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by
giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein
provided.
11 Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties
hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in
addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable
attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This
provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and
shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement.
12.Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that
time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition
and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the
obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this
Agreement by the party so failing to perform.
13 Assignment: lt is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto,
that SUPPLIER shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or
sell any of its rights under this Agreement except upon the prior express
written consent of CITY.
15. Reports and lnformation:
15.1 At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall
be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and
information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this
Agreement.
15.2 SUPPLIER shall maintain all writings, documents and records
prepared or compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement
for a minimum of four (4) years from the termination or completion of this or
Agreement. This includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static,
WASHERcoMpACToR EeurpMENT - page 6 of 10
Project No. 10044.H
JWC Environmental
Attn: Mark Wiflev. Contracts Manaoer
2850 S. Red Hill Ave., Suite 125
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Ph. @oo\ 331-2277 - (714\ 428-4612 @tect\
e-mail: markw@iwce.com
14. Discrimination Prohibited: ln performing the Work required herein,
SUPPLIER shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state
or local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race, color,
religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability.
photographic and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing,
any form of communication or representation including letters, words,
pictures, sounds or symbols or any combination thereof.
16.Audits and lnspections: Subject to applicable laws respecting the
protection of privacy and the City's requirement to comply with the ldaho
Public Records Act, at any time during normal business hours and as often
as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY
for examination all of SUPPLIER'S records with respect to all matters
covered by this Agreement. SUPPLIER shall permit the CITY to audit,
examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make
audits of all contracts, Invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel,
conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by
this Agreement.
17.Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material: No material produced in
whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the
United States or in any other country. The CITY shall have unrestricted
authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any
reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement.
19 Changes: The CITY may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope
of Work to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase
or decrease in the amount of SUPPLIER'S compensation, which are
mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and SUPPLIER, shall be
incorporated in written amendments which shall be executed with the same
formalities as this Agreement.
20.Construction and Severability: lf any part of this Agreement is held to be
invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or
enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of
the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion.
22. Advice of Attorney: Each party warrants and represents that in executing
this Agreement. lt has received independent legal advice from its attorney's
or the opportunity to seek such advice.
WASHER coMpAcroR EeutpMENT - page 7 of 10
Project No. 10044.H
18. Compliance with Laws: ln performing the scope of work required
hereunder, SUPPLIER shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and
codes of Federal, State, and local governments.
21 . Waiver of Default: Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shall
not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of
any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any
other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modification
of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided
above.
23. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral
of written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous
herewith.
24. Order of Precedence: The order or precedence shall be this contract
agreement, the Request for Proposals, JWC Environmental proposal dated
November 7, 2016.
25. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the
ordinances of the City of Meridian,
26. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding
until approved by the City of Meridian,
CITY OF MERIDIAN JWC ENVIRONMENTAL
BY:
TAMMY clERD, MAYOR BY: MARK WIFLW1, 0onacts —Manager
Dated: ;'M �1Z --
Approved by City Council:__. 7 �z '?q/ 7—
Attest: �jfD A UC USTr
— 114 ti
:— of
CJ CbLES,(dITY CLERK 1 �f
VDTAV)�-
I D Ali 0
5yla
Purchasing Department Approval -"`-'§
BY:
Keith
I -
tts, P rehas!4ingManager
Dated: —L112 511 7
WASHER COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.1-1
Dated: I/ ,.
Approved as to Form
CITY ATTORNEY
PubliZc, rks D ent Approval
BY:
Warr'e'n- Stewart,-'Ny Engineer
Dated: h
page 8 of 10
Attachment A
SCOPE OF WORK
REFER TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PW-1704-10044, ALL ADDENDUMS,
ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the Request for Proposals Package
#PW-1704-10044, and written proposal by Kenneth Bie dated November 7,2016,
WASHER COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.H
page 9 of 10
Attachment B
MILESTONE / PAYMENTSCHEDULE
A. Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed
$309,750.00.
WASHER COMPACTOR EOUIPMENT
Project No. 10044.H
TASK DESCRIPTION
DATE
(Dependent on
Council Approval)
PAYIVENT
A Delivery No Earlier than
Octobet 1 , 20'17 $278,77 5.00
B Startup, Completion of Training and Final Acceptance No later than
June 2018 $30,975.00
CONTRACT TOTAL $309.750.00
page 10 of 10
MILESTONE DATES/PRICING SCHEDULE
CitY Of ualidian
Detailed Stalement of Revenues and Expendilures - Rev and Exp Report
3590 - l{li Conatruction P!oj6ct6
60 - Bnte4rrile EUnd
Fron 10/1/2016 Throuqh 9/30/2017
Keith
Percent of
Budget
Remaining
Budget with Current Year
Actual
Budget
Remaining
Capital Outlay
Headworks Improvements
fleadworks/Eine Screens
WRRE Headworks Capacity
Expansion - Design
WRRF Grit Removaf
Equipment for the
Headv,,orks Expansion Proj
10044.G
10601.H
96164
10044
10044.d
6,339,423.66
707,458.50
0. 00
70?,458.50
6,339,O23.66
0. 00
100.00t
0. 00t
82,413.40
0 .00
82tAt3.AA
292,980 .AO
0.00
(292,984 -04)WRRF Cap. Exp. Process
Controf Softrare
Integration
Total Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
_l , r28,555.16
7,128,555.16
1,082,511.50 046 043 .66
1 ae2 511.50 6,046,443 .66
Date.5/12/7',1 01 .4 0:21 PM
84.81t--!3-i1!
Date: 4/25/2077
Fu nd 60 Department
CIry OF MERIDIAN
CONTRACT/AGENDA REQUEST CHECKLIST
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT PW - ENGR
3590
PSA:Task Order
washer Compactor Equipment for the Headworks Expansion Proiect
10044.H
Project Manager
Contrador/Consultant/Design Engineer
Budget Available (Attach Report)
Willthe project cross fiscal years?
Budget lnformation
Troy Thrall
JWC
Yes
Yes
FY Budget: 18 & 19
s309,7s0.00
x
6rant f
CONTRACT CHECKTIST
Low Bidder _
(Bid Results Attached) _
TypicalAward Yes X t,to
Highest Rated
(Ratings Attached)
BASIS OF AWARD
x
X
tf no-pl""* rt"r".i,.. Gii"s and conc|usion
10 Day Waiting Period Complete
PW License #
Corporation Status
lnsurance Certificates Received (Date)
Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date)
Builders Risk lns. Req'd: Yes _ No
(only applicabale for projects above S1,c100,000)
current? (attach print out) n/a
Date Award Posted January 23, 2017
x
Rating: N/A
Rating: N/A
lf yes, has policy been purchased? n/a
Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda
lssue Purchase Order No.
May 12,2011
Construction:
GL Account:96t64 Project #
Project Name:
Department Representative:
Contracl Amount:
No
Enhancement #:
Other:
Master Agreement
(Category)
Yes
Date lssued:
Approved by Council
WH5 submitted
NTP Date:lssue Notice of Award: Date:
(only for non Publicworks Projed)
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 1 OA3
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: Hidrostal Pumps
Approval of Supply Agreement to APSCO, LLC for the "Hidrosfal Pumps for the WRRF
Headworks Expansion" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $1,165,737.00 with 2017
spending authority of $233,174.40.
MEETING NOTES
9 APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Page 1
Memo
To: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk,
From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager
CC: Troy Thrall
Date: 5/15/2017
Re: May 23rd City Council Meeting Agenda Item
The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the
May 23rd City Council Agenda under a Purchasing/Public Works Department Report for
Council’s consideration.
Approval of Supply Agreement to APSCO, LLC for the “Hidrostal Pumps for the
WRRF Headworks Expansion” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $1,165,737.00
with 2017 spending authority of $233,174.40.
Recommended Council Action: Approval of Supply Agreement to APSCO,
LLC for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $1,165,737.00 and authority to expend
$233,174.40 in fiscal year 2017.
Thank you for your consideration.
City of Meridian
Purchasing Dept.
CONTRACT CHECKLIST
Date: REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Project Name:
Project Manager: Contract Amount:
Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer:
Is this a change order? Yes No Change Order No.
Fund: Budget Available ( Purchasing attach report ):
Department Yes No Construction
GL Account FY Budget: Task Order
Project Number: Enhancement: Yes No Professional Service
Equipment
Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No Grant
Grant #: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status (Federal Funded)
Print and Attach the determination Print, attach and amend bid by addendum (if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach
Master Agreement Category
(Bid Results Attached) Yes No (Ratings Attached) Yes No Date MSA Roster Approved:
Typical Award Yes No
If no please state circumstances and conclusion:
Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends:
PW License Expiration Date: Corporation Status
Insurance Certificates Received (Date): Expiration Date: Rating:
Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): Rating:
Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes No
(Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000)
Reason Consultant Selected 1 Performance on past projects
Check all that apply Quality of work On Budget
On Time Accuracy of Construction Est
2 Qualified Personnel
3 Availability of personnel
4 Local of personnel
Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation:
Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: By:
Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted
(Only for PW Construction Projects)
NTP Date:
Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
N/A
17 & 18
5/12/2017 Public Works
HIDROSTAL PUMPS
V. BASIS OF AWARD
N/A N/A
IV. GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded projects
VI. CONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION
This purchase is the result of a Council Approved Sole Source from 10/11/2016.
May 15, 2017
VIII. AWARD INFORMATION
Approval Date
Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved
VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete)
Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected
$1,165,737 Troy Thrall
If yes, has policy been purchased?
APSCO, LLC
III. Contract Type II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete)
60
3590
96164
10044.J
TASK ORDER RFP / RFQ BID
AGREEMENT FOR THE SUPPLY OF
HIDROSTAL PUMPS FOR THE
WRRF HEADWORKS EXPANSION PROJECT
PROJECT #10044.J
INTRODUCTION
Whereas, the City has a need for HIDROS TAL PUMPS ;and
WHEREAS, the SUPPLIER is specially trained, experienced and
competent to provide and has agreed to provide such equipment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants,
terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:
1. Equipment / Supply Specifications & Requirements:
1.1 SUPPLIER shall supply the equipment and services (if required in
specifications), to the City upon execution of this Agreement and receipt of
the City's written notice to proceed, all items, and comply in all respects, as
specified in the attached Specifications "Attachment A" and suppliers
proposal dated March 24, 2017, which by this reference are incorporated
herein.
1.2 The SUPPLIER shall provide all equipment and services under this
Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by
applicable federal, state and city laws, ordinances, regulations and
resolutions and the UCC. The SUPPLIER represents and warrants that itwill
perform its work in accordance with generally accepted industry standards
and practices forthe profession or professions that are used in performance
of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of performance of this
Agreement. Submittals shall be delivered to the City within 8 weeks of
receipt of order and signed contract. Embedded materials shall be delivered
HIDROSTAL PUMPS
Project No. 10044.J
page 1 of 10
THIS AGREEMENT FOR EQUIPMENT / SUPPLTES PROCUREMENT is made
this 23'd day of Mav, 2017, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a
municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of ldaho, hereinafter
referred to as "C|TY", 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642, and ApSCO,
LLC, hereinafter referred to as "SUPPLIER", whose business address is pO Box 2639,
Kirkland WA 98083-2639.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
10 weeks after approval ol submiltals, VFDs shall be delivered 20 weeks
after approval of submittals and Pumps shall be delivered 28 weeks after
approval of submittals to the address below:
City of [/eridian, Wastewater Treatment Facility
Attn: Troy Thrall
3401 N. Ten N/ile Hd.
li/eridian, lD 83646
2. Consideration
2.1 The SUPPLIER shall be compensated on a Fixed price basis as
provided in Altachmenl B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by
reference made a part hereof, for the Not-To-Exceed amount ol
$1,165,737.00.
2.2 The SUPPLIER shall provide the City with a delailed invoice upon
delivery of all equipment and supplies, which the City wilt pay within 30 days
of receipt of a correcl invoice and approval bythe City project lvlanager. The
City will not withhold any Federal or State income taxes or Social Security
Tax from any payment made by City to SUPPLIER under the terms and
conditions of this Agreement. Payment of all taxes and other assessments
on such sums is the sole responsibility of SUPPLIER.
2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, SUPPLIER shall not
be entitled lo receive from the City any additional consideration,
compensation, salary, wages, or olher type of remuneration for services
rendered underthis Agreement., including , but not ljmited to, meals, lodging,
lransportation, drawings, renderings or mockups. Specifically, SUppLIER
shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement to consideration in the form
of overtime, health insurance benef its, retiremenl benelits, paid holidays or
other paid leaves of absence of any type or kind whatsoever.
3. Funding:
Funding for this project will be split between two fiscal years, 201 7 (Oct. 20 1 6
- Sept. 2017) $233,174.40 and 2018 (Oct. 20'l 7 - Sept. 2018) $932,562.60.
The amounts beyond the 2017 fiscal year have not yet been appropriated by
the City. Contractor may not incur more than the amount specified and
approved for a specific fiscal year. Any and all additional expenditures
beyond the current fiscal year must be approved by City Council and
memorialized by a written amendment or change order to lhis Agreemenl.
4. Term:
4.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both
parties, and shall expire upon (a)completion of the agreed upon work, or (b)
HTDROSTAL PUMPS - page 2 of 10
Project No. '10044.J
5
4.2 Should SUPPLIER default in the performance of this Agreement or
materially breach any of its provisions, Cily, at City,s option, miy terminate
this Agreement by giving written notification to SUppLIER and provide
supplier with a reasonable cure period of 30 days.
4.3 . Should City fail to pay SUPPLIER all or any part of lhe compensation
set forth in Attachment B of this Agreement on the date due, SUppLlER, at
the SUPPLIER's option, may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not
remedied by the City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due.
Termination:
unless sooner terminated as provided below or unless some olher method or
time of terminalion is listed in Attachment A.
6
Notwithslanding lhe above, SUPPLIER shall not be relieved of tiability to the
CITY for damages sustained by the ClTy by virtue of any breach of this
lglg9rg4 by SUPPLIER, and the CtTy may withhotd any payments ro
SUPPLIEB for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of
damages due the CITY f rom SUPPLIER is determined. This provision shall
survive lhe termination of this agreemenl and shall not relieve SUppLIER of
its liability to the CITY for damages.
lndependent SUPPLIER:
If, through any cause, SUPPLIER, its officers, employees, or agents fails to
fulflll in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this-Agreement,
violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations ol this Agreement,
falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this
agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in
the performance of this contract, or if the City Council delermines that
terminalion of this Agreement is in the best interesl of ClTy, the ClTy shall
thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice
to SUPPLIER of such termination and specifying the efiective Aate thereof at
least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination. Absent
anyvalid offsets, Cityshall pay for any and all equipment, materials, supplies
furnished or acquired in execution of this agreemenl hereunder up io tf,e
date ol termination.
6.1 ln all matters pertaining to this agreement, SUppLIER shall be acting
as an independent SUPPLIER, and neither SUPPLIER nor any officei,
employee or agent of SUPPLIER will be deemed an employee of ClTy.
Except as expressly provided in Altachment A, SUppLIER has no authority
or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vesled in the City and
therefore has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the
Cily. The seleclion and designation of the personnel of the ClTy in the
performance of this agreement shall be made by the ClTy.
HrDBosrAL puMps - page 3 of 10
Project No. 10044.J
6.2 SUPPLIER, its agents, officers, and employees are and at all times
during the term ol this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as
independent SUPPLIERs and not as employees ol the City.
6.3 SUPPLIER shall determine the method, details and means of
furnishing equipment and supplies to be provided by SUppLIER under thisAgreement. SUPPLIER shall be responsible to City only for the
requirements and resulls specified in this Agreement ind, except as
expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City,s control
with respect to the physical action or activities ol SUppLIER in fulfillment of
this Agreement. lf in the performance of lhis Agreement any third persons
are employed by SUPPLIER, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively
under the direction and supervision and control of the SUppLlER.
7. lndemnification and lnsurance:
SUPPLIER shall indemnify and save and hold harmless ClTy from and for
any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to
persons or property and losses and expenses and other costs including
litigation costs and attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or ii
conneclion with the performance of this Agreement by the SUppllER, its
servants, agents, officers, employees, guesls, and business invitees, to the
extent caused by suppliers negligent acts oromissions. and nol caused by or
arising oul of the tortuous conduct of ClTy or its employees. SUppLiER
shall maintain, and specifically agrees lhat it will maintain, throughout the
term of this Agreement, liability insurance, in which the ClTy shall be named
an additional insured in the minimum amounts as follow: General Liability
One Million Dollars (91,000,000) per incident or occurrence, Automobile
Liability lnsurance One Million Dollars ($i,000,000) per incidenl or
occurrence and Workers' Compensation lnsurance, in the statutory limits as
required by law.. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of
the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless ClTy; and if ClTy
becomes liable for an amount in excess of lhe insurance limits, herein
provided, SUPPLIER covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold
harmless ClTYfrom and Ior all such losses, claims, aclions, or judgmenls for
damages or injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation
cosls and attorneys'fees, arising out of , resulting f rom , or in connection wilh
the performance of this Agreement by the SUPPLTER or SUppLIER's
officers, employs, agents, representatives orsubSUPPLlERs and resulting in
or attributable to personal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible
or intangible property, including use of, to the extent caused by Suppliers
negligent acts or omissions. SUPPLIER shall provide C|TYwith a Certificateol lnsurance, or olher proof of insurance evidencing SUPPLIER'S
compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of
insurance with the CITY at least ten (10) days prior to the date SUppLIER
begins performance of it's obligations under this Agreement. ln the evenl lhe
HtDBosrAL PUMPS - page 4 of 10
Project No. 10044.J
8
I
insurance minimums are changed, SUPPLIER shall immediately submit
proof of compliance with the changed limits. Evidence of all insurance shall
be submitted to the City Purchasing Agent with a copy to l\/eridian City
Accounling, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642.
7.2 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be
declared in writing and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either:
the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles, seltinsured retentions
or named insureds; or the SUPPLIER shall provide a bond, cash or letter of
credit guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim
administration and defense expenses.
7.3 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, SUPPLIER's lnsurance
coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City's elected officers,
officials, employees and volunleers. Any insurance or self-insurance
maintained by the City or the City's elected olf icers, officials, employees and
volunteers shall be excess of the SUPPLIER's insurance and shall not
contribule with SUPPLIER's insurance except as to the extent of City's
negligence.
The SUPPLIER's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability.
7.4 All insurance coverages for Suppliers subs shall be subject to all of
the insurance and indemnity requirements slated herein.
7 .5 ln no event shall the Supplier be liable for losl profits or other special,
indirecl or consequential damages. Supplier's lndemnity obligations shall be
limited to the limits of the Seller's insurance where Supplier's insurance is
applicable. Where Supplier's insurance is not applicable, the Supplier's
aggregate total liability shall not exceed the purchase order amounl."
Bonds: Supply are required at contract signing.
Warranty: See APSCO's Limited Warranly attached as Attachment C as
provided by Rockwell Automation and Hidrostal Pumps LLC.
Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties
hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be
deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified,
return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
City of Meridian
Purchasing Manager
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, ldaho 83642
10.
HIDROSTAL PUMPS
Prolect No. 10044.J
page 5 of 10
AP , LLC
Attn: J Kernkamo.President
P.O.Box 2639
11.
tz
IJ
14.
t5.
HIDROSTAL PUMPS
Project No. '10044.J
Assignm-enti lt is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto,
that SUPPLIER shall nol have the right to assign, tranifer, liypothecate oi
sell any of its rights under this Agreement except upon the-prior express
writlen consent of CITY.
Discrimination Prohlbited: ln performing the Work required herein,
SUPPLIER shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of anyfederal, state
or.local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basia of race, color,
religion, sex, national origin or anceslry, age or disabilily.
Beports and lnformation:
15.1 At such times and in such forms as the ClTy may require, lhere shallbe furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and
information as the CITY may request pertainlng to matters covered by this
Agreement.
page 6 of 10
Ph. (208) 489-0417
Email: kwatts@meridiancitv.orq
Kirkland. WA 98083-2639
Ph. (800) 791 -6195 - (206) 890-4039
e-mail: ikernkamo@apsco-llc.com
Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by
giving written nolice of such change to the other in the manner herein
provided.
Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties
hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entiiled, in
addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable
altorneys' fees as determined by a Courl of competent jurisdiction. This
provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and
shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement.
Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that
time is striclly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition
and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the
obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this
Agreement by the party so failing to perform.
tb
18
lo
20
21
23
22
15.2 SUPPLIER shall maintain all writings, documents and records
prepared or compiled in conneclion with the performance of this Agreement
for a minimum of tour (4) years from the terminalion or completion of this or
Agreemenl. This includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static,
photographic and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing,
any form of communication or representation including le ers, words,
pictures, sounds or symbols or any combination thereof.
17. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material: No material
produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to
copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CITY shall with
Suppliers writlen pre authorizalion the right to publish, disclose and
otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, dala or other materials
prepared under this Agreement.
Compliance with Laws: ln performing the scope ol work required
hereunder, SUPPLIER shall comply with allapplicable laws, ordinances, and
codes of Federal, State, and local governments.
Changes: The CITY may, from time to time, request changes in lhe Scope
of Work to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase
or decrease in the amount ol SUPPLIER'S compensation, which are
mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and SUPPLIER, shall be
incorporated in written amendments which shall be executed with the same
formalities as this Agreemenl.
Construction and Severability: lf any part of this Agreement is held to be
invalid or unenlorceable, such holding will not affect the validity or
enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of
the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion.
Waiver of Default: Waiver ol default by either party to this Agreement shall
not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of
any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any
other or subsequent breach, and shall not be conslrued to be a modilication
of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided
above.
Advice of Attorney: Each party warrants and represents lhat in executing
this Agreement. lt has received independent legal advice from its attorney's
or the opporlunity to seek such advice.
Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreemenl ol the
parties and supersedes any and all other agreemenls or understandings, oral
of written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous
herewith.
page 7 of 10HIDROSTAL PUIV]PS
Project No. 10044.J
24- Order of Precedence: The order or precedence shall be this contract
agreement, APSCO, LLC proposal dated May 4, 2017,
25. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the
ordinances of the City of Meridian.
26. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding
until approved by the City of Meridian,
CITY OF MERIDIAN APSCO, LLC
BY:
TAMMY t -- t
AMM deFK�DMAYOR BY: Ju—rv' KERNKAMP, PrLees—�ient—
Dated:--R--?��2ol
Approved by City COL=11:_—iZ2�
.-�1- PJ D A L, C --",
Attest: 0 &Vf
>
n /-F City of
CJ C ES., WY CLERK EI�TDTANt—,
,.l YfAAHO
Purchasing epartmen� A pro)-bf
BY:
Keithts' P u rc
<eith ts, Purchaysln6 Manager
Dated: -7
HIDROSTAL PUMPS
Project No. 10044.J
Dated:
Approved as to Form
CITY ATTORNEY
Public tV rks Dep dent Approval
BY: , I k .1
War en tewart, City Engineer
Dated: - /J Z- A -7
page 8 of 10
Attachment A
SPECIFICATIONS
1. Section 01 78 23 - TRA|NING REOUTRETVENTS AND OPERAT|ON AND
IUAINTENANCE DATA FoR pRE-pURCHASED EeUtptvENT (9 pages)
2. Section 26 05 04 - BASTC ELECTRTCAL MATERTALS AND METHODS
(1 1 pages)
3. Section 262923 - LOW VOLTAGE ADJUSTABLE FREQUENCY DRTVES
(7 pages)
4. Seclion 43 23 52.13 _ IIVIMERSIBLE WET.PIT VARIABLESPEED SCREW
CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS AND TNTAKE BASTNS (20 pages)
5. P&lD's (3 pages)
6. Electrical (1page)
HIDBOSTAL PUI!4PS
Prolect No. 10044.J page I of 10
Attachment B
MILESTONE / PAYMENTSCHEDULE
A. Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed
$1 ,1 65,737.00.
.Dates are included based on contract award date and Notice to proceed of June 7th
and used as a guideline only. Actual dates may very.
TASK DESCRIPTION DATE PAYIVENT
A Approval of Submitlals 8/16/2017 $1 16,57s.70
B.Acceplance of Factory Witness Testing 2113t2018 16/$1 1 6,573.70
C Deliver to Jobsite ?3/27t2018 $816,015.90
D Start-up, Testing & Operational & Maintenance
i/anuals $4110t2018 $1 16,573.70
CONTRAGT TOTAL $1J65/37J0
HIDROSTAL PUMPS
Project No. 10044.J
page '1 0 of 10
MILESTONE DATES/PRICING SCHEDULE
11L "r
E ( IDIAN
Public
• Department
TO: Keith Watts
FROM: Emily Skoro
Staff Engineer II
DATE: 8/30/2016
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
City Council Members
Keith Bird
Joe Borton
Whe Cavener
Genesis Milam
Anne Little Roberts
Ty Palmer
SUBJECT: Hidrostal Influent Submersible Pumps with Prerostal Intake Basins -Sole
Source Supplier Hidrostal
1. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS
Emily Skoro, Staff Engineer II 489-0356
Clint Dolsby, Assistant City Engineer 489-0341
Warren Stewart, City Engineer 489-0350
Tom Barry, PW Director 489-0372
II. DESCRIPTION
A. Describe Item
Influent pumping of raw sewage is one of the initial steps in the treatment process
for municipal wastewater at the Meridian Wastewater Resource Recovery
Facility. As such, it is critical these pumps be designed to pass solids through to
downstream treatment processes and be easy to maintain should a pump become
plugged with debris. An influent pump station is designed to meet peak hour
capacity with one pump out of service, so down time for maintenance cannot be
extended beyond a few hours.
Two types of influent pumping systems were considered for the Headworks
Capacity Expansion project: Hidrostal Submersible Pumps with Prerostal Intake
Basins and Vertical Turbine Solids Handling (VTSH) Pumps. While both
systems have good capability of passing solids through to downstream treatment
processes, the Hidrostal Submersible Pumps offers the following advantages over
the VTSH Pumps:
Page I of 2
• A shallower pump station wet well as cleaning occurs within each pump's
prerostal intake basin. VTSH pumps have a deeper wet well which adds
unnecessary cost and construction risk.
Easy removal from the wet well for maintenance purposes. The guiderail
system will allow staff to pull the pumps for service with existing
maintenance equipment. This is advantageous because operations would
not have to purchase any additional equipment or rent equipment to
perform maintenance on the pumps. VTSH pumps require a crane to lift
the pumps from the wet well which means more time and money as the
crane would be rented ($2500) each time maintenance is required.
Freeze -free bearings. Submersible pumps do not require lubrication of the
pump shaft bearings as they are immersed in water. This eliminates
building an approximately $400,000 enclosure that would be required if
purchasing the VTSH pumps as they have had freezing issues if not
protected from the weather.
Based on the comparison of Hidrostal and VTSH pumps, the Public Works
Department recommends procuring Hidrostal Submersible Pumps with Prerostal
Intake Basins.
The Public Works Department requests a sole source procurement as there is no
functional equivalent for the Hidrostal Influent Pump with Prerostal Intake Basin
only available through Hidrostal.
Departmental Approval: /
Page 2 of 2
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 01 78 23 - 1 Project No. 14 9129
August 2016
SECTION 01 78 23
TRAINING REQUIREMENTS AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA FOR PRE-PURCHASED
EQUIPMENT
PART 1–GENERAL
1.01 SUMMARY
A. This section specifies Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Manuals and related
equipment data for incorporation into the Owner’s asset management system.
B. Requirements for Vendor training sessions for pre-purchased equipment specified in
each equipment specification.
1.02 SUBMITTALS
A. Procedures: Informational submittal item requirements are satisfied when they have
been reviewed by the Owner and returned with a review action of “Receipt
Acknowledged”. There are no Vendor activities that are conditioned on Informational
Submittal items.
B. Informational Submittal Items:
1. Provide completed O&M Manual Transmittal Form (Form 01 78 23-A) and Equipment
Record Forms (Form 01 78 23-B and Form 01 78 23-C) with each submittal. Insert
Forms 01 78 23-B and Form 01 78 23-C as the initial pages of the Operation and
Maintenance Manual. Forms are located at the end of this Section.
2. Sixty days prior to the Operational Test Phase tests specified in each equipment
specification, submit Preliminary Operation and Maintenance manuals electronically.
3. Owner will complete review of preliminary O&M manuals and deliver review
comments within 30 days of receipt.
4. Provide four hard copies and two electronic copies of the final O&M Manual.
5. Training session presentation materials, agenda, and scheduled training date(s).
1.03 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL CONTENTS
A. O&M Manuals contain all information needed to operate, maintain, and repair all
systems and equipment and material provided for the Contract, including but not
limited to, the following:
1. General: Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the manufacturer,
the nearest manufacturer’s representative, and the manufacturer’s nearest
supplier of equipment and parts. Include the manufacturer’s web site
information.
2. Operating Instructions:
a. Safety Precautions: List personnel hazards for equipment and list
safety precautions for all operating conditions.
b. Operator Prestart: Provide requirements to set up and prepare
equipment for use.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 01 78 23 - 2 Project No. 14 9129
August 2016
c. Start-up, Shutdown, and Post-Shutdown Procedures: Provide a
control sequence for each of these operations.
d. Normal Operations: Provide control diagrams; explain operation and
control of systems and specific equipment. As applicable, provide
baseline vibration, temperature, pressure, etc. readings.
e. Emergency Operations: Provide emergency procedures for equipment
malfunctions to permit a short period of continued operation or to
shut down the equipment to prevent further damage. Include
shutdown instructions for fire, explosion, spills, or other foreseeable
contingencies. Provide guidance on emergency operations of all
utility systems including valve locations and portions of systems
controlled.
f. Service Requirements: Provide instructions for services to be
performed by the operator such as lubrication, adjustments, and
inspection.
g. Environmental Conditions: Provide a list of environmental conditions
(temperature, humidity, and other relevant data) that are best suited
for each product and describe conditions under which product should
not be allowed to run.
3. Preventive Maintenance:
a. Lubrication Data: Provide a table showing recommended lubricants
for specific temperature ranges and applications; provide charts with
a schematic diagram showing lubrication points, recommended
lubricants, and capacities; provide a lubrication schedule showing
service interval frequency.
b. Provide manufacturer's preventive maintenance schedule for routine
inspections, tests, and adjustments required to ensure proper and
economical operation and minimize repairs. Provide manufacturer's
projection of preventive maintenance man-hours, by type of craft, on
a daily, weekly, monthly, and annual basis. List tasks to be
performed at specific calendar and usage intervals.
4. Corrective Maintenance:
a. Troubleshooting Guides and Diagnostic Techniques: Provide step-by-
step procedures to promptly isolate the cause of typical malfunctions.
Describe clearly why the checkout is performed and what conditions
are to be sought. Identify tests or inspections and test equipment
required to determine whether parts and equipment may be reused
or require replacement.
b. Wiring and Control Diagrams: Provide point-to-point drawings of
wiring and control circuits including factory-field interfaces. Provide a
complete and accurate depiction of the actual job-specific wiring and
control work. On diagrams, number electrical and electronic wiring
terminals identically to actual installation.
c. Maintenance and Repair Procedures: Provide instructions and list
tools required to restore equipment to proper operational condition.
d. Removal and Replacement Instructions: Provide step-by-step
procedures and list required tools and supplies for removal, replace-
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 01 78 23 - 3 Project No. 14 9129
August 2016
ment, disassembly, and assembly of components, subcomponents,
and accessories. Provide tolerances, dimensions, settings, and
adjustments required. Include a combination of text and illustrations.
e. Spare Parts and Supply Lists: Provide a list of spare parts and
supplies required for maintenance and repair to ensure continued
service or operation without unreasonable delay. Identify spare parts
and supplies that require a long lead time. Provide list prices.
f. Corrective Maintenance: Provide manufacturer's projection of
corrective maintenance man-hours by type of craft. Separately
identify and tabulate corrective maintenance requiring equipment
manufacturer’s participation.
5. Appendices:
a. Parts Identification: Identify each component, subcomponent, and
accessory subject to replacement. Include special hardware
requirements, such as requirement to use high-strength bolts and
nuts. Identify parts by make, model, serial number, and source of
supply to allow reordering without further identification. Provide clear
and legible illustrations, drawings, and exploded views to enable easy
identification. When illustrations omit the part numbers and
description, cross reference the illustrated part to the listed part.
Group parts by components, subcomponents, and accessories.
b. Training Requirements: Provide manufacturer’s information used
during training of Owner’s staff.
c. Testing Equipment and Special Tool Information: Provide information
on required test equipment; provide information on special tools
needed for operation, maintenance, and repair.
B. Bind each hard copy of the final O&M Manual in slant-D, 3 ring view binders with
insertable clear vinyl overlay on the front cover and spine and heavy duty nylon
reinforced hinges.
1. Provide typed cover slip sheet identifying Project name, equipment name,
equipment number(s), Vendor and date. Provide typed spine slip sheet
identifying equipment name, equipment number(s), and date. For the final
O&M Manual leave the date blank.
2. Include a typed index and tabbed dividers between equipment categories or
specification sections for each copy of the O&M manual.
3. Provide multiple volumes as necessary so that the paper contents of each
volume does not exceed 3-1/2 inches thick. Label volumes consecutively as
“Volume [number] of [total number of volumes]”.
C. Deliver electronic copies of O&M manuals on a USB flash drive.
1. Provide electronic copies of O&M manuals as searchable Adobe Acrobat pdf
format files.
2. Where scanned pages are used, each scanned page is provided with a
bookmark and identified in the index. In addition, annotate each scanned
page identifying the content. For example, for a scan of a Special Warranty,
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 01 78 23 - 4 Project No. 14 9129
August 2016
insert an annotation in the file stating “Special Warranty Documentation,
Page 1.”
3. Index each manual with hyperlinks and bookmarks to each section.
4. Consistently orient all diagrams, drawings, pictures and illustrations.
5. Where 3D drawing equipment blocks have been provided by equipment
manufacturers, include equipment blocks as part of the electronic O&M
manuals.
PART 2–NOT USED
PART 3–EXECUTION
3.01 TRAINING
A. Conduct training after completion of Component Test Phase.
1. Training performed by factory representatives experienced in operation and
maintenance of the equipment. Sales representatives are not qualified to provide
training.
2. Training will not be considered complete unless:
a. All training deliverables are submitted, reviewed, and receipt acknowledged
before training begins.
b. System operates free of malfunctions during training.
c. All provisions of field and classroom training are met.
3. Repeat entire training session for any training on equipment that does not comply
with the requirements listed above.
B. FIELD AND CLASSROOM TRAINING REQUIREMENTS:
1. Conduct classroom training at the City of Meridian WRRF site.
2. Provide factory trained instructors familiar with both classroom and hands-on
instruction.
3. Training instructors present for class room training on time. Session beginning and
ending times to be coordinated with the Owner. Normal time lengths for class
periods can vary. Schedule brief rest breaks during training.
4. Plan for a class attendance of 12 people at each session; provide sufficient
classroom materials, samples, and handouts for those in attendance.
5. Instructors to have a typed agenda and well-prepared instruction material. The use
of visual aids (e.g., films, pictures, and slides) is recommended.
6. Provide equipment required for presentation of films, slides and other visual aids.
7. Maintain a log of classroom training including: instructors, topics, dates, time, and
attendees.
8. Furnish digitally recorded training on DVD. Label DVD with equipment or system
name and submit to Owner.
9. Include hands-on training held at the actual installed equipment location.
10. Submit electronic copies of handouts and presentation materials including copies of
PowerPoint presentations.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 01 78 23 - 5 Project No. 14 9129
August 2016
11. Notify the Owner of class times at least 10 days prior to the day of training.
12. Owner may, at its discretion, choose to record training sessions using internal
resources or by contracting with a third party. Contractor and manufacturers shall
cooperate with recording efforts.
3.02 TRAINING PRESENTATION CONTENTS
A. Train the Owner's personnel only with factory trained manufacturer’s representatives.
Provide expertise necessary to respond to questions during training. Use the following
general outline for manufacturer’s training presentations:
1. Familiarization:
a. Show catalog, parts lists, drawings, and O&M manuals.
b. Provide overview of design intent.
c. Review the installation of specific equipment items.
d. Demonstrate the unit’s operation.
e. Answer questions.
2. Safety:
a. Point out safety references.
b. Discuss safety precautions around equipment.
3. Operation:
a. Point out reference literature.
b. Explain all modes of operation, including emergency.
c. Test personnel on proper use of the equipment by letting them operate it.
4. Preventative maintenance:
a. Distribute the preventative maintenance list, including reference material,
and daily, monthly, quarterly, semi-annual and annual tasks.
b. Demonstrate how to perform preventative maintenance tasks.
c. Identify indicators of equipment problems.
5. Corrective Maintenance:
a. List possible problems.
b. Discuss repairs, point out special problems.
c. Open up the equipment and demonstrate procedures where practical.
6. Parts:
a. Review spare parts list, and indicate how to use.
b. Indicate how to order additional spare parts.
c. Provide recommendations for spare parts inventory.
d. Provide price list.
B. Schedule and attend a planning and coordination meeting 10 days prior to first
anticipated training class.
C. Provide a training status report and schedule-to-complete presentation materials.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 01 78 23 - 6 Project No. 14 9129
August 2016
D. Provide agenda and training materials for each presentation a minimum of seven
days prior to the presentation.
PART 4–FORMS
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 01 78 23 - 7 Project No. 14 9129
August 2016
01 78 23 01 78 23 01 78 23 01 78 23-- --A. OPERATIO A. OPERATIO A. OPERATIO A. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE N AND MAINTENANCE N AND MAINTENANCE N AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL TRANSMITTAL FORM TRANSMITTAL FORM TRANSMITTAL FORM TRANSMITTAL FORM
Date: Submittal No:
To: Contract No:
Spec. Section:
Submittal Description:
Attention: From:
Checklist Contractor Construction Manager
Satisfactory N/A Accept Deficient
1. Table of contents
2. Equipment record forms
3. Manufacturer information
4. Vendor information
5. Safety precautions
6. Operator prestart
7. Start-up, shutdown, and post-shutdown procedures
8. Normal operations
9. Emergency operations
10. Operator service requirements
11. Environmental conditions
12. Lubrication data
13. Preventive maintenance plan and schedule
14. Troubleshooting guides and diagnostic techniques
15. Wiring diagrams and control diagrams
16. Maintenance and repair procedures
17. Removal and replacement instructions
18. Spare parts and supply list
19. Corrective maintenance man-hours
20. Parts identification
21. Warranty information
22. Personnel training requirements
23. Testing equipment and special tool information
Remarks:
Contractor's Signature :
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 01 78 23 - 8 Project No. 14 9129
August 2016
01 78 23 01 78 23 01 78 23 01 78 23-- --B. EQUIPMENT RECORD FORM B. EQUIPMENT RECORD FORM B. EQUIPMENT RECORD FORM B. EQUIPMENT RECORD FORM
Equip Descrip Equip Loc
Equip No. Shop Dwg No. Date Inst Cost
Mfgr Mfgr Contact
Mfgr Address Phone
Vendor Vendor Contact
Vendor Address Phone
Maintenance Requirements D W M Q S A Hours
Lubricants: Recommended:
Alternative:
Misc. Notes:
Recommended Spare Parts Electrical Nameplate Data
Part No Quan Part Name Cost Equip
Make
Serial No. Id No.
Model No. Frame No.
Hp V Amp Hz
Ph Rpm Sf Duty
Code Insl. Cl Des Type
Nema Des C Amb Temp Rise Rating
Misc.
Mechanical Nameplate Data
Equip
Make
Serial No. Id No.
Model No. Frame No.
Hp Rpm Cap Size
Tdh Imp Sz Belt No. Cfm
Psi Assy No. Case No.
Misc
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 01 78 23 - 9 Project No. 14 9129
August 2016
01 78 23-C. EQUIPMENT RECORD FORM
Equip Descrip Equip Loc
Equip No. Shop Dwg No. Date Inst Cost
Mfgr Mfgr Contact
Mfgr Address Phone
Vendor Vendor Contact
Vendor Address Phone
Maintenance Requirements D W M Q S A Hours
Delaired statemen. o, *"""","""]if ::r::]fr:" - Rev and Exp Repolt
3590 - Illl Conatruction Projecta
60 - Ent6rpria6 E\rnd
Fton. 7A/7/2016'Ibra1-Lgh 9 /30 /2al'7
Kei lh
Percent of
Budget
Remaioing
Budget with Budget
Remaining
Capital Outlay
Headrorks Improvements
Headworks/Ei.ne Screens
WRRE lleadworks Capacity
Expansion - Design
WRRF Grit Removal
Equipment for the
Heaalworks Expansion Proj
10044.G
10601.H
96764
10044
10044,d
6,339,023.66
107,458.50
0. 00
707, 458.50
6,339,423.66
0 .00
100.00*
0.009
I{RRE Cap. Exp. Process
Controf Soft*are
Integration
82, 0'7 3 .00 82.073.00
0 .00 292,980 .40 t292,980 .00)
1t128,555.16 1,082, s 11.50 6,046,043.66
0.00r
I4 .819Total Capital Outlay
TOTA], EXPENDITURES 1,128,555.16 1,082,511.50 446 043.55 84.81r
Date: 5/15/11 04:24:33 PM
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 1 Project No. 149129
November 2016
SECTION 26 05 04
BASIC ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS
PART 1–GENERAL
1.01 REFEREMCES
A. The following is a list of standards which may be referenced in this section:
1. ASTM International (ASTM):
a. A167, Standard Specification for Stainless and Heat-Resisting
Chromium-Nickel Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip.
b. A1011/A1011M, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet, and Strip,
Hot-Rolled, Carbon, Structural, High-Strength Low Alloy and High-
Strength Low Alloy Formability.
c. E814, Method of Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops.
2. Canadian Standards Association (CSA).
3. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE): 18, Standard for
Shunt Power Capacitors.
4. International Society of Automation (ISA): RP12.06.01, Wiring Practices for
Hazardous (Classified) Locations Instrumentation–Part 1: Intrinsic Safety.
5. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA):
a. 250, Enclosures for Electrical Equipment (1,000 Volts Maximum).
b. AB 1, Molded Case Circuit Breakers, Molded Case Switches, and
Circuit-Breaker Enclosures.
c. C12.1 Code for Electricity Metering
d. C12.6 Phase-Shifting Devices Used in Metering, Marking and
Arrangement of, Terminals for
e. CP 1, Shunt Capacitors.
f. ICS 2, Industrial Control and Systems: Controllers, Contactors, and
Overload Relays Rated 600 Volts.
g. ICS 5, Industrial Control and Systems: Control Circuit and Pilot
Devices.
h. KS 1, Enclosed and Miscellaneous Distribution Switches (600 Volts
Maximum).
6. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA): 70, National Electrical Code
(NEC).
7. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL):
a. 98, Standard for Enclosed and Dead-Front Switches.
b. 248, Standard for Low Voltage Fuses.
c. 486E, Standard for Equipment Wiring Terminals for use with
Aluminum and/or Copper Conductors.
d. 489, Standard for Molded-Case Circuit Breakers, Molded-Case
Switches, and Circuit Breaker Enclosures.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 2 Project No. 149129
November 2016
B. 508, Standard for Industrial Control Equipment.
1. 810, Standard for Capacitors.
2. 943, Standard for Ground-Fault Circuit-Interrupters.
3. 1059, Standard for Terminal Blocks.
4. 1479, Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops.
1.02 SUBMITTALS
A. Action Submittals:
1. Provide manufacturers’ data for the following:
a. Control devices.
b. Control relays.
c. Circuit breakers.
d. Fused switches.
e. Nonfused switches.
f. Timers.
g. Fuses.
h. Terminal blocks.
i. Magnetic control relays.
j. Intrinsic safety barriers
k. Time delay relays.
l. Magnetic contactors.
m. Support and framing channel.
n. Firestopping.
o. Enclosures: Include enclosure data for products having enclosures.
1.03 EXTRA MATERIALS
A. Furnish, tag, and box for shipment and storage the following spare parts and special
tools:
1. Fuses, 0 to 600 Volts: Six of each type and each current rating installed.
PART 2–PRODUCTS
2.01 MOLDED CASE CIRCUIT BREAKER THERMAL MAGNETIC, LOW VOLTAGE
A. General:
1. Type: Molded case.
2. Trip Ratings: 15-800 amps.
3. Voltage Ratings: 120, 240, 277, 480, and 600V ac.
4. Suitable for mounting and operating in any position.
5. NEMA AB 1 and UL 489.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 3 Project No. 149129
November 2016
B. Operating Mechanism:
1. Overcenter, trip-free, toggle type handle.
2. Quick-make, quick-break action.
3. Locking provisions for padlocking breaker in open position.
4. ON/OFF and TRIPPED indicating positions of operating handle.
5. Operating handle to assume a center position when tripped.
C. Trip Mechanism:
1. Individual permanent thermal and magnetic trip elements in each pole.
2. Variable magnetic trip elements with a single continuous adjustment 3X to
10X for frames greater than 100 amps.
3. Two and three pole, common trip.
4. Automatically opens all poles when overcurrent occurs on one pole.
5. Test button on cover.
6. Calibrated for 40 degrees C ambient, unless shown otherwise.
7. Do not provide single-pole circuit breakers with handle ties where multi-pole
circuit breakers are shown.
D. Short Circuit Interrupting Ratings:
1. Equal to, or greater than, available fault current or interrupting rating shown.
E. Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter (GFCI): Where indicated, equip breaker as specified
above with ground fault sensor and rated to trip on 5 mA ground fault within 0.025
second (UL 943, Class A sensitivity, for protection of personnel).
1. Ground fault sensor shall be rated same as circuit breaker.
2. Push-to-test button.
F. Equipment Ground Fault Interrupter (EGFI): Where indicated, equip breaker specified
above with ground fault sensor and rated to trip on 30 mA ground fault (UL-listed for
equipment ground fault protection).
G. Magnetic Only Type Breakers: Where shown; instantaneous trip adjustment which
simultaneously sets magnetic trip level of each individual pole continuously through a
3X to 10X trip range.
H. Accessories: Shunt trip, auxiliary switches, handle lock ON devices, mechanical
interlocks, key interlocks, unit mounting bases, double lugs as shown or otherwise
required. Shunt trip operators shall be continuous duty rated or have coil-clearing
contacts.
I. Connections:
1. Supply (line side) at either end.
2. Mechanical wire lugs, except crimp compression lugs where shown.
3. Lugs removable/replaceable for breaker frames greater than 100 amperes.
4. Suitable for 75 degrees C rated conductors without derating breaker or
conductor ampacity.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 4 Project No. 149129
November 2016
J. Enclosures for Independent Mounting:
1. See Article Enclosures.
2. Service Entrance Use: Breakers in required enclosure and required
accessories shall be UL 489 listed.
3. Interlock: Enclosure and switch shall interlock to prevent opening cover with
switch in the ON position. Provide bypass feature for use by qualified
personnel.
2.02 FUSED SWITCH, INDIVIDUAL, LOW VOLTAGE
A. UL 98 listed for use and location of installation.
B. NEMA KS 1.
C. Short Circuit Rating: 200,000 amps RMS symmetrical with Class R, Class J, or Class L
fuses installed.
D. Quick-make, quick-break, motor rated, load-break, heavy-duty (HD) type with external
markings clearly indicating ON/OFF positions.
E. Connections:
1. Mechanical lugs, except crimp compression lugs where shown.
2. Lugs removable/replaceable.
3. Suitable for 75 degrees C rated conductors at NEC 75 degrees C ampacity.
F. Fuse Provisions:
1. 30 amp to 600 amp rated shall incorporate rejection feature to reject all
fuses except Class R.
2. 601 amp rated and greater shall accept Class L fuses, unless otherwise
shown.
G. Enclosures: See Article Enclosures.
H. Interlock: Enclosure and switch to prevent opening cover with switch in ON position.
Provide bypass feature for use by qualified personnel.
2.03 NONFUSED SWITCH, INDIVIDUAL, LOW VOLTAGE
A. NEMA KS 1.
B. Quick-make, quick-break, motor rated, load-break, heavy-duty (HD) type with external
markings clearly indicating ON/OFF positions.
C. Lugs: Suitable for use with 75 degrees C wire at NEC 75 degrees C ampacity.
D. Auxiliary Contact:
1. As required to disconnect adjustable frequency drive control power or other
auxiliary controls.
2. Operation: Make before power contacts make and break before power
contacts break.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 5 Project No. 149129
November 2016
3. Contact Rating: 7,200VA make, 720VA break, at 600V, NEMA ICS 5
Designation A600.
E. Enclosures: See Article Enclosures.
F. Interlock: Enclosure and switch to prevent opening cover with switch in ON position.
Provide bypass feature for use by qualified personnel.
2.04 FUSE, 250-VOLT AND 600-VOLT
A. Power Distribution, General:
1. Current-limiting, with 200,000 ampere rms interrupting rating.
2. Provide to fit mountings specified with switches.
3. UL 248.
B. Power Distribution, Ampere Ratings 1 Amp to 600 Amps:
1. Class: RK 1.
2. Type: Dual element, with time delay.
3. Manufacturers and Products:
a. Bussmann; Types LPS RK (600 volts) and LPN RK (250 volts).
b. Littelfuse; Types LLS RK (600 volts) and LLN-RK (250 volts).
C. Power Distribution, Ampere Ratings 601 Amps to 6,000 Amps:
1. Class: L.
2. Double O rings and silver links.
3. Manufacturers and Products:
a. Bussmann; Type KRP C.
b. Littelfuse, Inc.; Type KLPC.
D. Cable Limiters:
1. 600V or less; crimp to copper cable, bolt to bus or terminal pad.
2. Manufacturer and Product: Bussmann; K Series.
E. Ferrule:
1. 600V or less, rated for applied voltage, small dimension.
2. Ampere Ratings: 1/10 amp to 30 amps.
3. Dual-element time-delay, time-delay, or nontime-delay as required.
4. Provide with blocks or holders as indicated and suitable for location and use.
5. Manufacturers:
a. Bussmann.
b. Littlefuse, Inc.
2.05 CONTROL DEVICES
A. HOA Padlocking Cover: Provide padlocking cover on all HOA switches. Cover shall be
clear plastic. AB 800T or approved equal.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 6 Project No. 149129
November 2016
B. Potentiometer Units: Provide ohm value for the application. Provide with back plate
marked with 0-100% in 10% increments.
C. Contact Rating: 7,200VA make, 720VA break, at 600V, NEMA ICS 5 Designation
A600. Provide bifurcated contacts for 24Vdc switching.
D. Selector Switch Operating Lever: Standard.
E. Emergency stop/close buttons shall be 2-position, push-pull/twist release type with
red jumbo mushroom head.
F. Indicating Light: press-to-test LED, full voltage.
G. Pushbutton Color:
1. ON or START: Black.
2. OFF or STOP: Red.
H. Pushbutton and selector switch lockable in OFF position where indicated.
I. Legend Plate:
1. Material: Aluminum.
2. Engraving: Enamel filled in high contrasting color.
3. Text Arrangement: 11 character/spaces on one line, 14 character/spaces on
each of two lines, as required, indicating specific function.
4. Letter Height: 7/64 inch.
J. Manufacturers and Products:
1. Allen Bradley 800H or 800T, or equivalent.
2.06 INDICATING LAMP COLORS
A. All indicating lamps shall have an integrated lamp-test function or a common lamp
test switch for all lamps on a single line-up of equipment.
B. Unless otherwise specified, indicating lights shall be equipped with colored lenses in
accordance with the following schedule:
Color Function Examples
Green Run, open valve Equipment operating, motor running
Red Stopped, closed valve Alarm, end of cycle, motor stopped
White or Clear Normal condition, Ready Control power on, status OK
Amber (yellow) Abnormal condition Failure of equipment or status
abnormal, fault condition
2.07 TERMINAL BLOCK, 600 VOLTS
A. UL 486E and UL 1059.
B. Size components to allow insertion of necessary wire sizes.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 7 Project No. 149129
November 2016
C. Capable of termination of control circuits entering or leaving equipment, panels, or
boxes.
D. Screw clamp compression, dead front barrier type, with current bar providing direct
contact with wire between compression screw and yoke.
E. Yoke, current bar, and clamping screw of high strength and high conductivity metal.
F. Yoke shall guide all strands of wire into terminal.
G. Current bar shall ensure vibration-proof connection.
H. Terminals:
1. Capable of wire connections without special preparation other than stripping.
2. Capable of jumper installation with no loss of terminal or rail space.
3. Individual, rail mounted.
I. Marking system, allowing use of preprinted or field-marked tags.
J. Manufacturers:
1. Weidmuller, Inc.
2. Ideal.
3. Electrovert USA Corp.
2.08 MAGNETIC CONTROL RELAY
A. Industrial control with field convertible contacts rated 10 amps continuous, 7,200VA
make, 720VA break.
B. NEMA ICS 2, Designation: A600 (600 volts).
C. Time Delay Relay Attachment:
1. Pneumatic type, timer adjustable from 0.2 second to 60 seconds (minimum).
2. Field convertible from ON delay to OFF delay and vice versa.
D. Latching Attachment: Mechanical latch, having unlatching coil and coil clearing
contacts.
E. Manufacturers and Products:
1. Eaton/Cutler-Hammer; Type M 600.
2. General Electric Co.; Type CR120B.
2.09 TIME DELAY RELAY
A. Industrial relay with contacts rated 5 amps continuous, 3,600VA make, 360VA break.
B. NEMA ICS 2 Designation: B150 (150 volts).
C. Solid-state electronic, field convertible ON/OFF delay.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 8 Project No. 149129
November 2016
D. One normally open and one normally closed contact (minimum).
E. Repeat accuracy plus or minus 2 percent.
F. Timer adjustment from 1 second to 60 seconds, unless otherwise indicated on
Drawings.
G. Manufacturers and Products:
1. Square D Co.; Type F.
2. Eaton/Cutler-Hammer.
3. General Electric Co.
2.10 INTRINSIC SAFETY BARRIER
A. Provides a safe energy level for exposed wiring in a Class I, Division 1 or Division 2
hazardous area when circuit is connected to power source in nonhazardous area.
B. Rating: Power source shall be rated 24 volts dc, nominal, with not more than 250
volts available under fault conditions.
C. Contact Rating: 5 amps, 250 volts ac.
D. Mounting: Rail or surface.
E. Manufacturers and Products:
1. MTL, Inc.
2. R. Stahl, Inc.
2.11 SUPPORT AND FRAMING CHANNELS
A. Carbon Steel Framing Channel:
1. Material: Rolled, mild strip steel, 12 gauge minimum, ASTM A1011/A1011M,
Grade 33.
2. Finish: Hot-dip galvanized after fabrication.
B. Paint Coated Framing Channel: Carbon steel framing channel with electro-deposited
rust inhibiting acrylic or epoxy paint.
C. PVC Coated Framing Channel: Carbon steel framing channel with 40 mil polyvinyl
chloride coating.
D. Stainless Steel Framing Channel: Rolled, ASTM A167, Type 316 stainless steel, 12
gauge minimum.
E. Manufacturers:
1. B Line Systems, Inc.
2. Unistrut Corp.
3. Aickinstrut.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 9 Project No. 149129
November 2016
2.12 FIRESTOPS
A. General:
1. Provide UL 1479 classified hourly fire-rating equal to, or greater than, the
assembly penetrated.
2. Prevent the passage of cold smoke, toxic fumes, and water before and after
exposure to flame.
3. Sealants and accessories shall have fire-resistance ratings as established by
testing identical assemblies in accordance with ASTM E814, by Underwriters
Laboratories Inc., or other testing and inspection agency acceptable to
authorities having jurisdiction.
B. Firestop System:
1. Formulated for use in through-penetration firestopping around cables,
conduit, pipes, and duct penetrations through fire-rated walls and floors.
2. Fill, Void, or Cavity Material: 3M Brand Fire Barrier Caulk CP25, Putty 303,
Wrap/Strip FS195, Composite Sheet CS195 and Penetration Sealing
Systems 7902 and 7904 Series.
3. Two-Part, Foamed-In-Place, Silicone Sealant: Dow Corning Corp. Fire Stop
Foam, General Electric Co. Pensil 851.
2.13 ENCLOSURES
A. Finish: Sheet metal structural and enclosure parts shall be completely painted using
an electrodeposition process so interior and exterior surfaces as well as bolted
structural joints have a complete finish coat on and between them.
B. Color: Manufacturer’s standard color (gray) baked-on enamel, unless otherwise
shown.
C. Barriers: Provide metal barriers within enclosures to separate wiring of different
systems and voltage.
D. Enclosure Selections: Except as shown otherwise, provide electrical enclosures
according to the following table:
ENCLOSURES
Location Finish Environment NEMA 250 Type
Indoor Finished Dry 1
Indoor Unfinished Industrial Use 12
Outdoor Any Denoted “WP” 3R
Indoor and Outdoor Any Wet and/or Corrosive 4X: 304 Stainless Steel
Indoor and Outdoor Any Wet, Dust, or Oil 13
Indoor and Outdoor Any Hazardous Gas 7
Indoor and Outdoor Any Hazardous Dust 9
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 10 Project No. 149129
November 2016
PART 3–EXECUTION
3.01 GENERAL
A. Install equipment in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations.
3.02 CONTROL DEVICES
A. Unless otherwise shown, install heavy-duty, oil-tight type in nonhazardous, indoor, dry
locations, including motor control centers, control panels, and individual stations.
B. Unless otherwise shown, install heavy-duty, watertight and corrosion-resistant type in
nonhazardous, outdoor, or normally wet areas.
3.03 SUPPORT AND FRAMING CHANNEL
A. Install where required for mounting and supporting electrical equipment, raceway,
and cable tray systems.
B. Channel Type:
1. Interior, Dry (Noncorrosive) Locations:
a. Steel Raceway: Carbon steel or paint coated.
2. Interior, Corrosive (Wet or Dry) Locations:
a. PVC-Coated Steel Conduit and Other Systems Not Covered: Type 316
stainless steel or PVC-coated steel.
3. Outdoor Locations:
a. PVC-Coated Steel Conduit and Other Systems Not Covered: Type 316
stainless steel or PVC coated steel.
C. Paint cut ends prior to installation with the following:
1. Carbon Steel Channel: Zinc-rich primer.
2. Painted Channel: Rust-inhibiting epoxy or acrylic paint.
3. Nonmetallic Channel: Epoxy resin sealer.
4. PVC-Coated Channel: PVC patch.
3.04 INTRINSIC SAFETY BARRIERS
A. Install in compliance with ISA RP12.06.01.
B. Arrange conductors such that wiring from hazardous areas cannot short to wiring
from nonhazardous area.
C. Stencil “INTRINSICALLY SAFE CIRCUIT” on all boxes enclosing barriers.
3.05 FIRESTOPS
A. Install in strict conformance with manufacturer’s instructions. Comply with
installation requirements established by testing and inspecting agency.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 05 04 - 11 Project No. 149129
November 2016
B. Sealant: Install sealant, including forming, packing, and other accessory materials, to
fill openings around electrical services penetrating floors and walls, to provide
firestops with fire-resistance ratings indicated for floor or wall assembly in which
penetration occurs.
END OF SECTION
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 29 23 - 1 Project No. 149129
November 2016
SECTION 26 29 23
LOW-VOLTAGE ADJUSTABLE FREQUENCY DRIVES
PART 1–GENERAL
1.01 REFERENCES
A. The following is a list of standards which may be referenced in this section:
1. National Electrical Manufacturers’ Association (NEMA):
a. NEMA ICS 1, General Standards for Industrial Controls and Systems.
b. NEMA ICS 2, Standards for Industrial Control Devices, Controllers and Assemblies
c. NEMA ICS 3, Industrial Systems
d. NEMA ICS 3.1, Safety Standards for Construction and Guide for Selection,
Installation and Operation of Variable-speed Drive Systems
e. NEMA ICS 4, Terminal Blocks for Industrial Control Equipment and Systems
f. NEMA ICS 6, Enclosures for Industrial Controls and Systems.
2. American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
a. ANSI C37.90, Relays and Relay Systems Associated with Electric Power
Apparatus
b. ANSI C37.30A(1984), Definitions and Requirements for High- Voltage Air
Switches, Insulators, and Bus Supports, Supplement to C37.30-1971
c. ANSI C37.32, Schedules of Preferred Ratings, Manufacturing Specifications and
Application Guide for High-Voltage Air Switches, Bus Supports, and Switch
Accessories.
3. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
a. IEEE 519, Harmonic Control and Reactive Compensation of Static Power
Converters
1.02 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL
A. Listed and labeled by Underwriter’s Laboratories, Inc. (UL), ETL, or Canadian Standards
Association.
B. All upgrades to specified requirements per UL 508 or ETL.
C. Quality Assurance: The Owner reserves the right to observe factory tests on the VFD
controller at the Owner’s option and expense.
D. Compatibility: VFD controller’s performance shall be compatible and tolerant of
disturbances produced by other VFD controllers and not interfere with each other.
E. Programming: Provide VFD controller configuration and MACRO or sub-routine
programming to meet specified driven equipment requirements.
F. Maintainability: VFD controller’s parts shall be interchangeable and modular for all
controllers.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 29 23 - 2 Project No. 149129
November 2016
G. Factory Test: Subject complete VFD enclosure to a complete simulated operational test.
Drive a calibrated load at various speeds over the specified speed range to determine
VFD efficiency.
1.03 SUBMITTALS
A. ACTION SUBMITTAL ITEMS:
1. A copy of this specification Section with addenda updates, and all referenced
Sections, with addenda updates, with each paragraph check-marked to show
specification compliance or marked to show deviations.
2. Catalog and technical data indicating the equipment complies with the Construction
Document.
3. Installation instructions, outline dimensions and weights including filters and/or
isolation transformers, front view drawing identifying control and monitoring devices,
nameplate engravings, shipping section dimensions, weight, and foundation
requirements or wall mounting requirements for all assemblies.
4. External connection diagram showing function and identification of all terminals
requiring field connections.
5. Schematics and wiring diagrams.
6. Plan drawings showing conduit entry locations
7. Current and voltage distortion calculations:
a. Point of Common Coupling (PCC)
b. Include first 36 odd current and voltage harmonics. Voltage shall be calculated
on line-to-line basis.
c. Provide distortion figures for each harmonic and the total demand distortion.
8. Efficiency and power factor calculations:
a. Calculate efficiencies of the VFD controller including the auto-transformer (where
applicable), ventilation fans, control power and all VFD losses.
b. Calculate displacement and total power factor including filter.
c. Perform calculations at 100, 75, and 50 percent speed.
d. Include first 36 harmonics.
9. Calculations of cooling and ventilation requirements.
10. Location and description of service center and spare parts stock.
11. Recommended spare parts list.
12. Written descriptions explaining ladder diagram operation, system operation, and
analog signal processing.
13. Comprehensive interconnection diagrams for VFD and motor.
14. Certification that VFD, motor, and driven load are compatible throughout the
specified speed range.
15. Certified statement from the manufacturer accepting responsibility for providing a
fully functioning installation as specified herein.
B. INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTAL ITEMS:
1. Certified final factory test procedure and results for each drive prior to shipment.
2. Manufacturer’s operation and maintenance information in accordance with Section
01 78 23.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 29 23 - 3 Project No. 149129
November 2016
3. Factory and field test documentation.
4. Training schedule and materials.
1.04 COORDINATION
A. Motor: Obtain and review the appropriate data for the driven motor and load over the
required speed range, for a complete system analysis. Verify that equipment is mutually
compatible and free of resonance over the complete operating range. Coordinate the
assignment of any critical frequencies with the motor supplier. Prepare the certificate
required under Submittals paragraph in this Section; the certificate shall specifically
state whether the VFD equipment is rated for variable torque or constant torque
applications.
PART 2–PRODUCTS
2.01 MANUFACTURERS/PRODUCTS
A. Variable frequency drives shall be Rockwell Automation PowerFlex 753.
2.02 SYSTEM
A. General: Provide integrated, all solid state variable frequency drives (VFD) complete with
power and signal conditioning. Each VFD system shall be installed within its own
individual enclosure. System shall comply with NEMA ICS 1, 3, 4, 3.1, 4, and 6.
B. Operation: Accomplish speed control by adjusting the output frequency according to the
desired reference speed. Adjust ac voltage and frequency simultaneously to provide the
constant Volts/Hertz necessary to operate the motor at the desired speed. The VFD must
use pulse width modulation technology.
C. Rating:
1. Line Voltage: 480 volts, -5 percent continuous, -10 percent momentary, +10 percent,
3 phase.
2. Line Frequency: 60 Hz, ±2 Hz
3. Ambient Temperature: 5°C to 40°C
4. Altitude: Up to 3,300 feet above sea level.
5. Power Factor: Above 0.95 at full speed and rated load.
D. Performance:
1. Efficiency: Above 95 percent at 100 percent full speed, above 93 percent at 70
percent full speed.
2. VFD Inrush Current: Limited to less than 100 percent of motor full load
3. Duty Cycle: 6 starts per hour.
E. Features:
1. Provisions to accept the following control signals for automatic and manual
operation:
a. FWD & REV Run signal from a single remote contact closure when specified
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 29 23 - 4 Project No. 149129
November 2016
b. A 4-20 mA dc signal for speed control. The VFD shall provide linear speed control
of the motor from zero to full speed as the variable speed input signal varies from
its minimum to maximum. Input impedance shall be 250 ohms resistive.
2. Native Ethernet/IP connectivity.
3. Remote Potentiometer for manual speed control. Motor speed indicator calibrated in
percent of full speed.
4. A 4-20 mA dc signal for remote speed indication to a local PLC. The VFD shall provide
linear speed indication of the motor speed from zero to full speed. Input impedance
shall be 250 ohms resistive.
5. A 4-20 mA dc signal for remote motor current indication to a local PLC. The VFD shall
provide linear current indication of the motor from zero to full current. Input
impedance shall be 250 ohms resistive.
6. Incoming line fused lockable disconnect switch to meet UL requirements.
7. 24 VDC control circuitry and 480V-120V step down transformer.
8. Variable time delay for delaying motor drive restart after power failure; timer range
shall be 0 to 120 seconds, with initial settings differing by 10 seconds for each drive;
provide module which causes multiple attempts to restart.
9. Provision for automatic emergency shutdown in any mode, activated by the following:
a. Motor thermal protection.
b. Any additional abnormal conditions as shown on the Drawings. Provide for
manual restart.
10. Auxiliary contacts for remote indication of "Run" and "VFD Fault."
11. VFD able to withstand harmonic distortion and notching as defined in IEEE-519 for
dedicated system (10 percent voltage distortion factor and 36,500 volt
microseconds commutation notch area).
12. VFD operable with motor disconnected, in order to test VFD.
13. Linearity and repeatability accuracy of 3 phase output of 1 percent of analog input
control signal regardless of input power voltage fluctuations between 437 and 505
volts.
14. Independent acceleration and deceleration controls, adjustable from 2 to 30 Hz per
second.
15. Conditioning: Provide 5 percent nominal reactance power input series line reactor for
power conditioning. Provide 3 percent nominal reactance power output series line
reactor for power conditioning. Install all conditioning devices within the drive panel
or enclosure.
16. Label with fault current rating and arc flash warning per NEC. See Section 26 05 73,
Electrical Systems Analysis.
17. Label denoting overload setting and date it was set.
F. Protection: Protect VFD against the following conditions:
1. Reverse phase sequence and single phasing of input power.
2. Input power failure.
3. Input transient voltages, including peak suppression and snubbers, in accordance
with ANSI C37.90.
4. Transmission signal interference.
5. Output overcurrent.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 29 23 - 5 Project No. 149129
November 2016
6. Input overcurrent.
7. Motor over temperature.
8. Cabinet over temperature.
9. Under voltage: VFD shall automatically shut down if input voltage falls below preset
limit with automatic restart upon return to a stable supply.
G. Construction:
1. Enclosure:
a. Housing controller modules and components shall be free-standing, wall-
mounted, NEMA 1 gasketed and fabricated from steel, 12-gauge minimum.
b. Dead front and dead back construction with all modules, components, load, line,
and control terminations fully front accessible.
c. Fan-vented with axial fan controlled via thermostat.
d. Provision for top and bottom entry of wiring and conduits.
e. Gasketed doors mounted on semi-concealed hinges, with lockable door latches.
f. Door-mount the following devices:
1) HMI with the following indications.
a) Power On
b) Speed indication
2) Control devices and indication:
a) HOA switch and Motor Run
b) VFD Fault Indication
3) External operating handle for the incoming line fused disconnect.
g. Control components shall be in accordance Section 26 05 04, Basic Electrical
Materials and Methods. Configuration of the enclosure and the components shall
be as shown on the drawings.
h. Components: Mount components on circuit cards or modules, which can be
adjusted or replaced in the field without the use of special tools.
i. Finish: Paint finish shall be ANSI Grey.
H. Spare Parts: Furnish two sets of spare power fuses for each size and type of fuse used;
furnish a minimum of five fuses of each size and type of control circuit fuse.
PART 3–EXECUTION
3.01 INSTALLATION
A. The Contractor will be responsible for installation of the VFD enclosure, including:
1. Per manufacturer’s instructions, lace power conductors to resist short circuit forces.
2. Operate each drive from no load to full load and perform a spectrum analysis to verify
that the waveform on the line side of the VFD is in compliance with IEEE 519 for
general systems.
3.02 MANUFACTURER’S SERVICES
A. Provide the services of a factory trained service technician to inspect and check out each
system before energizing.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 29 23 - 6 Project No. 149129
November 2016
B. Furnish manufacturer’s representative for the following services at site or classroom as
designated by Owner for minimum person-days listed below, travel time excluded:
1. 3 person-days (one person for 8 hours within regular Contractor working hours) for
installation inspection and prestartup classroom training.
2. Furnish startup services and training of Owner’s personnel at such times as
requested by Owner to accommodate the shift schedules of Owner’s operation and
maintenance staff.
3. Certify completion of training on Form 43 05 11-B, included with Section 43 23
52.13.
C. Provide a completed Manufacturer’s Certificate of Proper Installation form, included with
this specification.
END OF SECTION
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 26 29 23 - 7 Project No. 149129
November 2016
MANUFACTURER’S CERTIFICATE OF PROPER INSTALLATION
OWNER EQPT SERIAL NO.
EQPT TAG NO:
EQPT/SYSTEM:
PROJECT NO:
SPEC. SECTION:
I hereby certify that the above-referenced equipment/system has been: (check applicable)
□ Installed in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations.
□ Inspected, checked, and adjusted.
□ Serviced with proper initial lubricants.
□ Electrical and mechanical connections meet quality and safety standards.
□ All applicable safety equipment has been properly installed.
□ Functional tests.
□ System has been performance tested and meets or exceeds specified performance
requirements. (When complete system of one manufacturer.)
Note: attach any performance test documentation from manufacturer.
Comments:
I, the undersigned Manufacturer’s Representative, hereby certify that I am (i) a duly authorized
representative of the manufacturer, (ii) empowered by the manufacturer to inspect, approve, and
operate their equipment, and (iii) authorized to make recommendations required to ensure
equipment furnished by the manufacturer is complete and operational, except as may be otherwise
indicated herein. I further certify that all information contained herein is true and accurate.
Date: , 20____
Manufacturer:
By Manufacturer’s Authorized Representative:
(Authorized Signature)
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 1 Project No. 149129
November 2016
SECTION 43 23 52.13
IMMERSIBLE WET-PIT VARIABLE SPEED SCREW CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS AND INTAKE BASINS
PART 1–GENERAL
1.01 SUMMARY
A. Section includes:
1. Immersible/submersible helical screw centrifugal pumps complete with
motor, variable frequency drive, suction bell and spool, discharge nozzle and
discharge elbow, guide bars, guide bar brackets, and accessories suitable for
pumping raw, unscreened wastewater at variable speed.
2. All external relays required for pump thermal and moisture protection.
3. Self-cleaning, prefabricated intake basins for each pump capable of
capturing, entraining, and pumping floatables and other debris.
B. Equipment List:
Item Equipment number
Influent Pump 1 SIPS1PMP0001
Influent Pump 1 Motor Thermistors SIPS1SWH0001A-TSH
Influent Pump 1 Moisture Probe SIPS1SWH0001A-MSH
Influent Pump 1 VFD SIPS1VFD0001
Influent Pump 1 Intake Basin -
Influent Pump 2 SIPS1PMP0002
Influent Pump 2 Motor Thermistors SIPS1SWH0002A-TSH
Influent Pump 2 Motor Lower Bearing Temperature Sensor SIPS1SWH0002B-TSH
Influent Pump 2 Moisture Probe SIPS1SWH0002A-MSH
Influent Pump 2 Float Switch SIPS1SWH0002B-MSH
Influent Pump 2 VFD SIPS1VFD0002
Influent Pump 2 Intake Basin -
Influent Pump 3 SIPS1PMP0003
Influent Pump 3 Motor Thermistors SIPS1SWH0003A-TSH
Influent Pump 3 Motor Lower Bearing Temperature Sensor SIPS1SWH0003B-TSH
Influent Pump 3 Moisture Probe SIPS1SWH0003A-MSH
Influent Pump 3 Float Switch SIPS1SWH0003B-MSH
Influent Pump 3 VFD SIPS1VFD0003
Influent Pump 3 Intake Basin -
Influent Pump 4 SIPS1PMP0004
Influent Pump 4 Motor Thermistors SIPS1SWH0004A-TSH
Influent Pump 4 Motor Lower Bearing Temperature Sensor SIPS1SWH0004B-TSH
Influent Pump 4 Moisture Probe SIPS1SWH0004A-MSH
Influent Pump 4 Float Switch SIPS1SWH0004B-MSH
Influent Pump 4 VFD SIPS1VFD0004
Influent Pump 4 Intake Basin -
Influent Pump 5 SIPS1PMP0005
Influent Pump 5 Motor Thermistors SIPS1SWH0005A-TSH
Influent Pump 5 Motor Lower Bearing Temperature Sensor SIPS1SWH0005B-TSH
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 2 Project No. 149129
November 2016
Influent Pump 5 Moisture Probe SIPS1SWH0005A-MSH
Influent Pump 5 Float Switch SIPS1SWH0005B-MSH
Influent Pump 5 VFD SIPS1VFD0005
Influent Pump 5 Intake Basin -
Influent Pump 6 SIPS1PMP0006
Influent Pump 6 Motor Thermistors SIPS1SWH0006A-TSH
Influent Pump 6 Moisture Probe SIPS1SWH0006A-MSH
Influent Pump 6 VFD SIPS1VFD0006
Influent Pump 6 Intake Basin -
1.02 REFERENCES:
A. This Section contains references to the following documents. They are a part of this
Section as specified and modified. Where a referenced document contains
references to other standards, those documents are included as references under
this section as if referenced directly. In the event of conflict between the
requirements of this section and those of the listed documents, the requirements of
this section prevail.
Reference Title
AISI 316 Stainless Steel
ANSI/HI 1.1–1.6 Rotodynamic (Centrifugal) Pumps
ANSI/HI 9.6.3 Rotodynamic Pumps (Centrifugal and Vertical) Guideline for Allowable
Operating Region
ANSI/HI 11.6 Submersible Pump Tests
ANSI/HI 14.6 Rotodynamic Pumps for Hydraulic Performance Acceptance Tests
ASTM A48 Gray Iron Castings
ASTM A532 Abrasion-Resistant Cast Irons
ASTM A536 Ductile Iron Castings
ASTM A743 Stainless Steel Casting
ISO 1940 Mechanical Vibration – Balance Quality Requirements of Rigid Rotors
ISO 9001 Quality Systems
NEMA MG 1 Motors and Generators
1.03 SUBMITTALS
A. Procedures:
1. Except at his own risk, the Vendor is not authorized to proceed with
manufacture of the specified components until all Action Submittal Items
have been reviewed by the Owner and returned with a review action of “No
Exceptions Taken” or “Make Corrections Noted”.
2. Informational submittal item requirements are satisfied when they have been
reviewed by the Owner and returned with a review action of “Receipt
Acknowledged”. There are no Vendor activities that are conditioned on
Informational Submittal items.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 3 Project No. 149129
November 2016
B. Action Submittal Items:
1. A copy of this specification section with addendum updates included, with
each paragraph check-marked to indicate specification compliance or
marked to indicate requested deviations from specification requirements.
Check-marks ( ) denote full compliance with a paragraph as a whole.
Deviations shall be underlined and denoted by a number in the margin to the
right of the identified paragraph. The remaining portions of the paragraph not
underlined signify compliance on the part of the Vendor with the
specifications. Include a detailed, written justification for each deviation.
Failure to include a copy of the marked-up specification sections, along with
justification(s) for any requested deviations to the specification requirements,
with the submittal is sufficient cause for rejection of the entire submittal with
no further consideration.
2. A copy of the contract process and instrumentation diagrams (Figures 1–3)
and the motor control schematic (E-000-0101), marked to show specific
changes necessary for the equipment proposed in the submittal. If no
changes are required, mark the drawing(s) "no changes required". Failure to
include copies of the relevant drawings with the submittal shall be cause for
rejection of the entire submittal with no further review.
3. Electrical internal connection diagrams, and external interconnection
diagrams, drawn in accordance with JIC and/or ICS standards. Connection
diagrams shall be the conventional type with lines showing point-to-point
wiring and must show terminals and devices as viewed by the electrician;
wireless or wire schedule types are not acceptable.
4. Product data on all electrical relays (intrinsically safe and non-intrinsically
safe) required for thermal and moisture protection, including voltage and
contact rating.
5. Drawings showing general dimensions and confirming the size of pumps,
motors, drives and specified appurtenances; piping connections; construction
details of equipment; wiring diagrams; and weight of equipment.
6. Product data on lifting chain assemblies and grip eye attachment as specified
in Paragraph 2.06-F.
7. Shaft deflection calculations.
8. Bearing L-10 life calculations.
9. Motor submittal items:
a. Motor Data Form 26 05 84-A, included with this specification. Provide
a separate form for each motor size.
b. Motor duty rating.
c. Motor outline, dimensions and weight.
d. Manufacturer's general descriptive information relative to motor
features.
e. Cabling information for each motor size including number of cables,
size, type, and length.
f. Inverter duty motor specifications including the motor winding voltage
rating.
g. Operating speed range.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 4 Project No. 149129
November 2016
h. Motor manufacturer’s statement that the submitted motor is fully
suitable for operation with the selected variable frequency drive.
C. Informational Submittal Items:
1. Certified factory test results of each pump prior to shipment in accordance
with the requirements of this Section. Certified material includes copies of
test logs and resulting performance curves and performance guarantee
statement.
2. Warranty information.
3. Pump discharge elbow anchor requirements including size, number,
placement pattern, and embedment depth. Provide a bolting template for
each pump size with specific instructions for required grouting of the
discharge elbow for each pump size.
4. Manufacturer’s installation recommendations and procedures for the
prefabricated intake basins.
5. Installation Certification Form 43 05 11-A as specified in paragraph 3.02-D.
6. Training Certification Form 43 05 11-B as specified in paragraph 3.02-D.
7. Manufacturer’s operation and maintenance information in accordance with
Section 01 78 23.
8. Installation manual containing instructions to be followed in the installation
of the pumps and intake basins. The manual, as a minimum, contains the
following information:
a. Major parts list including weights of component parts.
b. Procedures to be followed in unpacking and unloading, including
directions indicating proper methods for moving the equipment.
c. Instructions for field assembling of match-marked components as
they will be shipped.
d. Instructions for alignment, leveling, and all pertinent information for
the proper installation of the equipmnet.
e. Instructions for anchoring and securing the equipment.
f. Equipment weight and lifting points.
g. Wiring, alignment, and connection instructions for the influent pumps
and motors.
h. Site storage and protection requirements for equipment prior to
installation.
D. Provide the following spare parts for each size pump:
1. Two complete sets of all gaskets.
2. Two complete sets of all bearings.
3. Two complete sets (upper and lower) of mechanical seals.
4. Two complete sets of wear rings.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 5 Project No. 149129
November 2016
PART 2–PRODUCTS
2.01 MANUFACTURERS
A. Hidrostal immersible/sumbersible screw centrifugal pumps, model H12K-SS and
model F10K-MD.
B. Prefabricated intake basins shall be Hidrostal Prerostal™ size 1300.
2.02 TYPE
A. Each pump will be of the heavy-duty, submersible, vertical shaft, centrifugal nonclog,
helical screw type, suitable for pumping raw, unscreened wastewater. Pumps are
designed for continuous or cyclic operation under submerged, partially submerged, or
totally dry conditions without damage to the pump and motor.
B. Each pump will be installed above a prefabricated intake basin capable of capturing,
entraining, and removing floatables and other debris from the wetwell during a pump
station cleaning cycle. During normal operation the wetwell level will be controlled
above the top of the pump motors and the intake basin will be fully submerged.
2.03 PERFORMANCE/DESIGN CRITERIA
A. Service Conditions:
Parameter Value
Equipment number(s) SIPS1PMP0001
SIPS1PMP0002
SIPS1PMP0003
SIPS1PMP0004
SIPS1PMP0005
SIPS1PMP0006
Area Exposure Exposure type: Head space 1
Environment: Atmospheric 2
Fluid Type Raw wastewater containing fine and fibrous
material including but not limited to hair,
plant material, sand, silt, petroleum products,
industrial solvents, animal fats, oils, and
plastic.
Fluid Temperature 50 to 75 degrees F
1. Headspace: Low oxygen, wet environment with exposure to hydrogen sulfide and
other corrosive gases.
2. Atmospheric: in the space surrounding a structure or process.
B. Operating Conditions:
1. The full speed operating conditions presented in the table below are based
on the following:
a. SIPS1PMP0001 and SIPS1PMP0006 (small pumps): two small
pumps and three large pumps in service (only required for peak hour
flow conditions if a large pump is out of service)
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 6 Project No. 149129
November 2016
b. SIPS1PMP0002, SIPS1PMP0003, SIPS1PMP0004, and
SIPS1PMP0005 (large pumps) : four large pumps in service
2. Automatic control of the influent pumps will be through the plant’s SCADA
system. During normal operation, with either SIPS1PMP0001 or
SIPS1PMP0006 running or one or more of SIPS1PMP0002, SIPS1PMP0003,
SIPS1PMP0004, and SIPS1PMP0005 running in parallel, the maximum
normal operating speed for the pumps will be limited to a value less than the
full operating speed (approximately 1530 rpm and 1120 rpm for the small
and large pumps, respectively). The listed rated capacity of the pumping
installation will be based on the maximum normal operating speed. Rated
capacities at maximum normal operating speed will be as follows:
a. SIPS1PMP0001 and SIPS1PMP0006, each: 4.0 mgd at total head of
28.5 feet
b. SIPS1PMP0002, SIPS1PMP0003, SIPS1PMP0004, and
SIPS1PMP0005, each: 8.0 mgd at total head of 41.0 feet
Parameter Value
Equipment number Small pumps:
SIPS1PMP0001
SIPS1PMP0006
Large pumps:
SIPS1PMP0002
SIPS1PMP0003
SIPS1PMP0004
SIPS1PMP0005
Full speed operation, Condition A1,4
Capacity, mgd 4.3 8.7
Total head, feet 43.0 43.0
Pump speed, rpm 1760 1180
NPSHA, feet 34.6 40.3
Operating limits, percent of BEPQ 5 Within AOR Within AOR
Maximum permissible vibration, inches/sec 0.14 0.14
Full speed operation, Condition B 2,4
Capacity, mgd From pump H/Q curve From pump H/Q curve
Total head, feet 37.5 37.5
Pump speed, rpm 1760 1180
NPSHA, feet 36.6 41.8
Operating limits, percent of BEPQ 5 70 to 126 70 to 126
Maximum permissible vibration, inches/sec 0.1 0.1
Reduced speed operation, Condition C 3,4
Capacity, mgd 1.3 3.3
Total head, feet 18.1 18.8
Pump speed, rpm 850 650
NPSHA, feet 34.7 40.5
Operating limits, percent of BEPQ 5 70 to 126 70 to 126
Maximum permissible vibration, inches/sec 0.1 0.1
1. Condition A is the full speed operating condition. Guarantee performance at Condition A in accordance
with this Section. Select pumps to achieve Condition A performance, but also operate continuously within
specified vibration limits at the head head and flow conditions specified for Condition B and Condition C.
Condition A must be within the pump manufacturer’s published allowable operating range (AOR) for the
pump.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 7 Project No. 149129
November 2016
2. Condition B head is presented to indicate operating conditions when the pump is operating at maximum
normal operating speed against minimum anticipated system head, assuming a hypothetical head-
capacity curve. NPSHA, as listed for Condition B, is calculated on a pumped flow of 4.6 mgd and 9.5 mgd
for the small pumps and large pumps, respectively.
3. Condition C is the anticipated continuous duty minimum speed condition. Pumps furnished under this
specification shall be capable of sustained (24 hours per day) operation at this condition.
4. Total head in the above table is the algebraic difference between the discharge head and suction head
as defined in ANSI/HI 1.1 through 1.6. Net positive suction head available (NPSHA) in the above tabulation
is referred to the wet well invert as shown and is calculated in accordance with ANSI/HI 1.3 for average
barometric pressure and maximum temperature conditions. An allowance of five feet has been included
for the presence of volatile constitutes in the pumped fluid.
5. Best efficiency point flow (BEPQ) is the flow rate at the peak pump efficiency point on the pump curve
for the required operating speed.
C. Design Requirements:
Parameter Value
Equipment number Small pumps:
SIPS1PMP0001
SIPS1PMP0006
Large pumps:
SIPS1PMP0002
SIPS1PMP0003
SIPS1PMP0004
SIPS1PMP0005
Influent pumps (each unit)
Diameter of rigid sphere capable of passing
through the pump from inlet to discharge,
minimum, inches
4.5 5.88
Efficiency at best efficiency point (BEP) at full
speed, minimum, percent
78 78
Suction bell outside diameter, inches 30 40
Suction specific speed (Nss), maximum 1 15,000 10,000
Pump inlet size, inches 10 12
Pump discharge size, inches 10 12
Full speed operation, maximum, rpm 1,760 1,180
Operating speed, constant or variable Variable Variable
Approximate pump centerline elevation,
measured from wetwell invert, ft
3.20 3.33
Motor (see paragraph 2.07)
Type Explosion proof (XP)
Immersible
Explosion proof (XP)
Immersible
Size, maximum, hp 51 107
Speed, maximum, rpm 1,800 1,200
Inverter duty Yes Yes
Thermal protection Yes Yes
Moisture protection Yes Yes
Power supply voltage, phase, frequency 480 Vac, 3-ph, 60 hz 480 Vac, 3-ph, 60 hz
Hazardous rating Class 1, Div 1, Group D Class 1, Div 1, Group D
Reversing motor No No
Multispeed motor No No
Motor starting type VFD VFD
1. Suction specific speed is calculated (using NPSH3) in accordance with ANSI/HI 1.3, paragraph
1.3.4.1.15.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 8 Project No. 149129
November 2016
2.04 SYSTEM OPERATION
A. Pumps will be installed in an unheated and unventilated wetwell receiving raw,
unscreend wastewater from a 72-inch diameter approach pipe. Each pump will be
guide-rail mounted with the pump suction centered over a prefabricated intake basin,
installed on the opposite side of the wetwell forebay channel. Raw wastewater will be
pumped to a distribution channel upstream of the influent screens.
B. During normal operation, the pumps will be controlled by the plant SCADA system to
automatically sequence pump operations based on liquid level in the wetwell. Pump
speed will be modulated to maintain a level setpoint. The level setpoint will increase
as influent flows increase and more pumps are brought into service. At low flows, a
single small pump will operate. As flows increase beyond the capacity of the single
small pump, level in the wetwell will begin to rise and when the next level setpoint is
reached, the lead large pump will be called to run and the small pump will turn off,
with the large pump then modulating speed to maintain the new level setpoint. This
sequence continues as flows increase and additional large pumps are brought
online, then reverses as influent flows decrease.
C. The wetwell will include an automatic cleaning cycle programmed to occur during the
plant’s minimum flow period. Frequency of cleaning cycles will be operator
adjustable. When a cleaning cycle is initiated, online pumps ramp up to bring the
wetwell down to a cleaning level setpoint and then the duty cleaning pump is called
to run at its preset cleaning speed setpoint for a preset cleaning cycle duration. The
purpose of the cleaning cycle is to entrain floatables and other debris accumulated in
the wetwell into the pump suction for removal. Setpoints for the cleaning cycle will be
set by the manufacturer during commissioning.
2.05 MATERIALS
Component Material
Pump and motor casing ASTM A48, cast iron, class 30
Discharge fitting and elbow ASTM A48, cast iron, class 30
Suction spool and bell AISI, stainless steel, type 316
Impeller ASTM A743, stainless steel, grade CF8M
Suction liner ASTM A532, high chrome cast iron, class III-A
Wear ring ASTM A532, high chrome cast iron, class III-A
Impeller flange ASTM A536, ductile iron, grade 80-55-06
Motor and pump shaft AISI, stainless steel, type 316
External bolts and nuts AISI, stainless steel, type 316
Guide bar brackets AISI, stainless steel, type 316
Anchor bolts AISI, stainless steel, type 316
Guide rails, lifting chain assemblies AISI, stainless steel, type 316
Prefabricated intake basin Fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP)
Prefabricated intake basin frame Galvanized steel
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 9 Project No. 149129
November 2016
2.06 FEATURES:
A. Volute Casing and Inlet/Discharge Nozzles:
1. Volute designed for efficient conversion of kinetic to potential energy with
clear passageways designed to pass the minimum specified solid sphere
size.
2. Volute casing: one-piece casting with a tangential or center discharge nozzle.
Casting designed to bear the loads associated with removal and replacement
of the pump and to withstand the loads imposed by the specified operating
conditions.
3. Discharge nozzle designed to mate with the discharge fitting required for
connection to the discharge elbow. Discharge fitting custom fabricated by the
manufacturer to center the pump suction over the center of the intake basin.
4. Volute casing fitted with an inlet nozzle connected to an intermediate spool
piece and suction intake bell. Spool piece custom fabricated by the
manufacturer to locate the suction bell at the required clearance above the
center of the intake basin.
5. Suction and discharge flanges drilled for ANSI 150-pound bolting.
B. Shaft:
1. Pump shaft of sufficient section to limit deflection at the shaft seal to not
more than 2 mils (0.002 inches) at any operating condition within the zone
described by the specified continuous-duty operating conditions. Calculate
deflection at the shaft seal as required by provisions set forth in ANSI/HI 1.3.
C. Bearings:
1. Heavy-duty, permanently greased lubricated anti-friction type double shielded
and factory sealed. Thrust bearings designed to take the full axial load of the
impeller.
2. Designed for an L-10 rating life of at least 50,000 hours at any operating
condition within the zone described by the specified continuous-duty
operating conditions. Provide calculations supporting the selection of bearing
sizes.
D. Impeller:
1. Dynamically balanced, one-piece, single suction, screw centrifugal, single
vane, nonclogging design capable of passing solids, fibrous materials, heavy
sludge, and other matter found in raw wastewater applications.
2. Hydraulic design of the impeller combining the action of a positive
displacement screw with the action of a single-vane centrifugal impeller to
provide a single, non-bifurcated flow stream with only gradual changes in flow
direction.
3. Leading edge of the impeller vane blends into the impeller body in such a way
that rags or other fibrous material caught on the leading edge and folded
over both sides of the vane will be unfolded and released flowing through the
pump.
4. Impeller flange or impeller contains a spiral groove on the rear face so that
any solids in the pumped media are discharged from the space between the
backplate and the rear of the impeller.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 10 Project No. 149129
November 2016
5. Abrasion resistant wearing ring system to provide efficient sealing between
the volute and impeller.
6. Conical impeller and adjustable-position suction liner. Any axial adjustment of
the suction liner will cause the clearance between the impeller and suction
liner to change uniformly along the entire length of the impeller to maintain
design hydraulic efficiencies. Regulable suction liner externally adjustable to
compensate for wear by means of regulating screws.
E. Mechanical Seals:
1. Shaft sealing provided by tandem double mechanical seals running in an oil
reservoir, composed of two separate lapped face seals.
2. Mechanical seal nearest the bearing isolates the seal cooling oil from the
motor frame. Provide manufacturer’s standard seal material for the specified
motor size.
a. Small pump motors: carbon/ceramic faces
b. Large pump motors: tungsten carbide/silicon carbide faces
3. Mechanical seal nearest the impeller contained in a seal chamber formed by
the impeller flange and a recess cast into the motor frame. Bellows-type
construction with bellows designed to prevent contaminants from contacting
the stainless steel spring that loads the seal face. Seal faces are a solid
tungsten carbide rotating face running agains a solid silicon carbide
stationary face. Provide manufacturer’s standad bellows material for the
specified motor size.
a. Small pump motors: rubber bellows
b. Large pump motors: stainless steel bellows
4. To minimize debris reaching the shaft seal, mechanical seal nearest the
impeller isolated from contaminants in the pumped media by a labyrinth-fit
between the backside of the impeller and the backplate, as well as by pump-
out grooves cast into the impeller back shroud and into the backplate.
F. Pump Anchorage, Guide Rail System, and Accessories:
1. Each pump mounted using manufacturer-supplied discharge elbow anchor
system, cantilevering the entire pump and motor from the volute discharge
flange out over the center of the intake basin. Installation must provide an
unobstructed area under the pumps. Supports from the underside of the
pump volute or pump suction to wetwell floor are not acceptable.
2. Provide each pump with a dual-rail guide system to allow removal of the
pump without entering the wetwell or requiring any bolts, nuts, or other
fastenings to be removed. Sealing of the pumping unit to the discharge
connection accomplished by a simple linear downward motion of the pump
with the entire weight of the pumping unit guided to and pressing tightly
against the discharge connections. Pump supported by a positive metal-to-
metal interlocking flange additionally sealed by a nitrile rubber ring pressed
against the fixture flange by the weight of the pump.
3. Provide all accessories needed for a complete guide rail system for each size
pump, including:
a. Guide rails/bars (stainless steel pipe)
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 11 Project No. 149129
November 2016
b. Upper guide bar brackets – provide with integral hook to suspend
lifting chain assembly
c. Discharge elbow connections
d. Anchor bolts
4. Lifting chain assemblies: Provide all pumps with the same size lifting chain,
sized based on the largest pump specified in this Section. Provide one
compatible grip eye attachment, sized based on the lifting the largest pump
specified in this Section. The grip eye must be capable of hanging from the
hook of a hoist, enabling it to be lowered down over a guide to the pump
lifting chain and engage the grip eye to the chain.
G. Prefabricated Intake Basin:
1. Provide one intake basin for each pump. Each intake basin is the same size
for all pumps. Specified size shall be capable of accommodating future
Hidrostal I16K size pumps with the same basin.
2. Each intake basin is fiberglass with a galvanized steel frame. Intake basins
will be permanently secured/grouted in the wetwell by the Contractor,
following the manufacturer’s recommendations.
2.07 ELECTRIC MOTORS
A. General Requirements for Motors:
1. Manufactured by the same manufacturer as the pump.
2. Factory Mutual (FM) listed for Class 1, Division 1, Group D hazardous
atmospheres.
3. Inverter duty, squirrel-cage induction, shell type design, housed in an air-
filled, watertight chamber, NEMA Design B with a service factor of 1.15 based
on nameplate rating.
4. Immersible type motors suitable for full-load, continuous operation either
completely dry or fully submerged in the pumped liquid of up to 65-foot
depths.
5. Stator winding and stator leads insulated with moisture resistant Class F
insulation, rated at a temperature of 155 degrees C.
B. Motor Cooling System:
1. Specifically designed for use with variable speed applications.
2. Air filled motor housing type with a separate heat exchanger circuit.
3. Shaft-mounted cooling pump circulating oil from a jacket surrounding the
stator to a heat exchanger surface cast into the pump backplate. The
circulating oil transfers excess motor heat directly to the pumped media
inside the volute without the need for submergence.
4. Circulating oil capable of providing adequate motor cooling at any continuous
power output up to the nameplate rating in an ambient temperature of up to
40 degrees C.
C. Motor Thermal and Moisture Protection:
1. Three thermistor type thermal sensors embedded in the stator windings and
wired in parallel. Thermistors are wired to an external thermistor relay (to be
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 12 Project No. 149129
November 2016
installed by the Contractor in a junction box at the pump’s disconnect/plug
rack). If winding temperature exceeds rating operating temperature, the
thermistor relay opens a protective circuit and shuts down power to the
motor. The external relay must be manually reset before the motor can be
returned to operation. Provide Siemens 3RN10 thermistor relay for each
pump.
2. Provide manufacturer’s standard bearing temperature protection device and
intrinsically safe, external relay, for the specified motor size.
a. SIPS1PMP0001 and SIPS1PMP0006 (small pumps) motors: none.
b. SIPS1PMP0002, SIPS1PMP0003, SIPS1PMP0004, and
SIPS1PMP0005 (large pumps) motors: one normally closed thermal
sensor provided in close contact to the lower thrust bearing. Sensor
wired in a separate, intrinsically safe circuit to an external
temperature relay (to be installed by the Contractor in a junction box
at the pump’s disconnect/plug rack). Wired to shut down the motor if
bearing temperature exceeds rated operating temperature. Provide
Warrick 17 intrinsically safe relay for each large pump.
3. Provide manufacturer’s standard protection device for moisture monitoring in
the dry portion of the motor and intrinsically safe, external relay, for the
specified motor size.
a. SIPS1PMP0001 and SIPS1PMP0006 (small pumps) motors: none.
b. SIPS1PMP0002, SIPS1PMP0003, SIPS1PMP0004, and
SIPS1PMP0005 (large pumps) motors: one dry chamber float switch
installed in the dry portion of the motor. Float switch wired in a
separate, intrinsically safe circuit to an external moisture relay (to be
installed by the Contractor in a junction box at the pump’s
disconnect/plug rack). Wired to shut down the motor if water enters
the dry portion of the motor. Provide Warrick 17 intrinsically safe relay
for each large pump.
4. One conducitivity moisture probe for each motor to monitor the moisture
content of the oil in the chamber between the mechanical seals. Moisture
probe wired in a separate, intrinsically safe circuit to an external moisture
relay (to be installed by the Contractor in a junction box at the pump’s
disconnect/plug rack). If moisture relay is tripped, an alarm will be issued
indicating a failure of the outer mechanical seal. Provide Warrick 17
intrinsically safe moisture probe relay for each pump.
D. Power and Control Cables:
1. Each pump will have three separate cables leaving the motor, one cable for
power and two cables for controls. One control cable dedicated to intrinsically
safe controls. Provide the same length for all cables for all pumps, minimum
cable length of 50 feet.
2. The Contractor will cut the cables to length in the field during installation of
the Meltric plugs and local disconnect panels for each pump.
E. Cable Seals:
1. Motor cable-entry sealing assembly includes five components to ensure a
positive, redundantly watertight seal:
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 13 Project No. 149129
November 2016
a. Sealing components are mechanically isolated from cable strains by a
two-piece restraining clamp that securely grips the cable above the
moisture-sealing components and bears any mechanical forces
applied to the cable.
b. The cable moisture seal consists of an elastomer grommet prevented
from extruding past the cable by stainless steel retaining washers on
either side. Grommet compressed tightly against the cable outside
diameter and the entry assembly inner diameter by a screwed
follower gland.
c. Each individual conductor interrupted by a solid copper isolation dam
to prevent wicking of moisture through the conductor strands.
d. Cable insulation sealed by an epoxy poured into the cable entry and
totally encapsulating the stripped back insulation and the individual
copper dams. Poured epoxy seal also functions as a redundant seal
for the cable outside diameter.
e. Cable free end sealed from moisture entry during shipping, storage,
and prior to connection to the control panel by a plastic sleeve
securely clamped over the cable end.
2.08 VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVES
A. Provide a complete VFD enclosure package for each pump as specified in Section 26
29 23. See influent pump control schematic (Drawing E-000-0101).
2.09 CONTROLS:
A. General: The influent pumps will be controlled by a PLC at the IPS electrical building.
The Contractor’s system’s integrator will program the influent pumps for automatic
control during normal operation and during cleaning cycles, based on the Engineer’s
control strategy for the IPS.
B. The pump manufacturer is responsible for assisting with commissioning and to
recommend setpoints for the pumps for the automatic cleaning cycle. Provide
manufacturer’s representative as specified in paragraph 3.02-E.
2.10 COATINGS
A. Provide manufacturer’s standard prime and finish coatings.
2.11 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL
A. Factory Testing: At a minimum, factory testing of the pumps will include hydrostatic
tests and performance tests. The Owner reserves the right to be present during
factory testing. Notify the Owner at least four weeks prior to the scheduled test
date(s).
B. Hydrostatic Tests: Factory test all pressure sustaining parts in accordance with the
following requirements:
1. Conform hydrostatic tests to the requirements of ANSI/HI 11.6 for
submersible pumps. Hold castings at the test pressure for the duration
indicated in ANSI/HI 11.6 and 14.6. Ensure that test results are certified
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 14 Project No. 149129
November 2016
correct by the chief engineer or individual in responsible charge of the
manufacturing facility.
C. Performance Tests: Subject each pump to a performance test to verify the full range
of operating conditions in accordance with the following requirements:
1. Performance Guarantee:
a. Guarantee pump performance (flow and head, efficiency, and NPSH3)
to the criteria specified under this paragraph. Guarantee in writing
and have certified by the chief engineer or individual in responsible
charge of the test facility.
b. Test not less than eight points on the head/capacity curve to
document hydraulic performance from shutoff to maximum capacity
without overloading the motor. Cover full-speed operating points
specified in this Section. Ensure that tests conducted at specified
operating conditions are performed with sump liquid levels adjusted
to produce the NPSHA indicated for that specific condition. Perform
NPSH3 tests for not less than four full-speed operating conditions,
but not less than specified operating conditions and at the best
efficiency point (BEPQ).
c. Conform test procedures to those set forth in ANSI/HI 14.6
acceptance grade 1U, and as specifically detailed in these
specifications.
d. Ensure that acceptance criteria for head and capacity test results,
based upon Condition A specified in this Section, are as required in
ANSI/HI 11.6 and 14.6, acceptance grade 1U.
e. Ensure that acceptance criteria for NPSH3 at any specified operating
condition are the values proposed in the submitted curves, with a
tolerance of plus 0, minus unlimited.
2. Performance Tests:
a. Test the pumps with the suction bell/spool and the discharge
elbow/spool fitted to the pump. Apply the specified performance
requirements to the complete pumping assembly. Include in the
certified test data separate readings for inlet and discharge head for
each data point.
b. Perform NPSH3 tests in accordance with ANSI/HI 14.6, paragraph
14.6.5.8.2.1, Type 1 Test except that not less than four tests should
be performed at the test motor speed to completely cover the range
of operating conditions specified in this Section. Ensure that one of
the test points is at BEP flow to confirm the test pump’s Nss. Extend
all NPSH3 tests from 50 percent to 140 percent of best efficiency
flow at maximum operating speed, or to not less than 10 percent (in
terms of flow) past the flow at Operating Condition B, whichever is
greater. Cause for rejection is failure to achieve specified
performance or performance proposed in accepted submittal
documents (capacity and head, efficiency, or NPSH3), whichever is
more restrictive.
c. Have all test results, including test logs and generated curves,
certified correct by the chief engineer or individual in responsible
charge of the manufacturer’s test facility.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 15 Project No. 149129
November 2016
3. NPSH Margin Limitations:
a. NPSH3, as used in the following paragraphs, means the NPSH3 at the
impeller eye, determined in accordance with ANSI/HI 11.6 or 14.6, as
applicable for the proposed pump. Document the method used to
determine NPSH3 for the proposed pump.
PART 3–EXECUTION
3.01 INSTALLATION
A. The influent pumps and VFD enclosures will be installed by a Contractor hired by the
Owner and installed in accordance with the the project documents and the vendor’s
installation instructions, and in accordance with all OSHA, local, state, and federal
codes and regulations.
3.02 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL
A. General: Perform all testing for this product or system consistent with applicable
codes, and the manufacturers’ current quality assurance program.
B. Component Test Phase: Following the preoperational test phase tests performed by
the Contractor, the Contractor will perform the following field tests during the
component test phase.
1. Demonstrate that each influent pump is correctly installed and performs
successfully at each specified operating condition. Each continuous duty
operating condition will be tested for a short duration (approximately 5 to 10
minutes or as required to demonstrate successfull operation). Additionally,
each pump will be tested for a longer duration (1 hour minimum) at a
throttled condition that results in maximum power draw on the motor without
overloading the motor. Tests will be conducted with clean water (plant
effluent). The Contractor will be responsible for providing means to fill and
recirculate flow from the pump station discharge back to the wetwell and to
simulate design head conditions.
2. Demonstrate that each influent pump functions correctly when the IPS
wetwell level is drawn down below the weir of the prefabricated intake basin,
simulating operation during a wetwell cleaning cycle. Coordinate with the
pump manufacturer to optimize required cleaning cycle setpoints (cleaning
speed for small and large pumps, cleaning level, cleaning cycle duration,
etc.).
C. System Test Phase: Following the component test phases performed by the
Contractor, the Contractor will perform the following field tests during the system test
phase.
1. Conduct overall test of IPS system controls and pump operation with multiple
pumps in service. Tests during this phase will still be conducted with
recirculation of clean water as described for the component test phase. The
Contractor will be responsible for supplying additional water or removing
water during the testing as needed to achieve target levels in the wetwell for
the various flow conditions and to test speed control of pumps. Testing will
include, at a minimum, the following operating conditions:
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 16 Project No. 149129
November 2016
a. One small pump running, modulating speed between minimum and
maximum normal speed setpoints.
b. Transition from one small pump running to one large pump running.
c. One large pump running, modulating speed between minimum and
maximum normal speed setpoints.
d. Transition from one large pump running to two large pumps running
in parallel.
e. Two large pumps running, modulating speed between minimum and
maximum normal speed setpoints.
f. Transition from two large pumps running to three large pumps
running in parallel.
g. Three large pumps running, modulating speed between minimum and
maximum normal speed setpoints.
h. Transition from three large pumps running to four large pumps
running in parallel.
i. Four large pumps running, modulating speed between minimum and
maximum normal speed setpoints.
j. Two small pumps and three large pumps running, modulating speed
between minimum and maximum normal speed setpoints.
D. Operational Test Phase: Following the component and system test phase tests, the
Contractor will perform the following tests as part of the operational test phase.
1. Conduct tests to demonstrate full automatic operation of the IPS over all
specified operating conditions with the plant control systems, using actual
plant wastewater.
E. Manufacturer Services:
1. On-Site Inspections and Training: Provide a factory-trained manufacturer’s
representative at the Site for the following activities. Specified durations do
not include travel time to or from the Site.
a. Installation Inspections: Assist, supervise, and inspect the
Contractor’s activities during installation of the prefabricated intake
basins and pumps. Provide a minimum of 24 inspection hours.
Provide a completed Form 43 05 11-A, included with this
specification.
b. Test Phase Inspections: Assist, supervise, and inspect the
Contractor’s activities during the component, system, and operational
test phase activities. Guide Contractor’s activities during system and
operational testing of the pumps for automated wetwell cleaning
cycles specified in this Section. Provide a minimum of 40 inspection
hours.
c. Training Sessions: Provide a minimum of 4 hours classroom training
for each training session. Conduct one training session. Certify
completion of training on Form 43 05 11-B, included with this
specification.
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 17 Project No. 149129
November 2016
END OF SECTION
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 18 Project No. 149129
November 2016
26 05 84-A. MOTOR DATA FORM
Equipment Name: Equipment No(s):
Project Site Location:
Nameplate Markings
Mfr: Mfr Model: Frame: Horsepower:
Volts: Phase: RPM: Service Factor:
FLA: LRA: Frequency: Amb Temp Rating: ºC
Time rating: Design Letter:
(NEMA MG1-10.35) (NEMA MG-1.16)
KVA Code KVA Code KVA Code KVA Code Letter: Letter: Letter: Letter: Insulation Class:
The following information is required for explosion-proof motors only:
A. Approved by UL for installation in Class _____, Div _____, Group _____
B. UL frame temperature code ____ (NEC Tables 500-8B)
The following information is required for all motors 1/2 horsepower and larger:
A. Guaranteed minimum efficiency
(Section 26 05 84-2.03)
B. Nameplate or nominal efficiency
Data Not Necessarily Marked on Nameplate
Type of Enclosure: Enclosure Material:
Temp Rise: ºC (NEMA MG1-12.41,42)
Space Heater included? Yes No If Yes: Watts Volts
Type of motor winding over Type of motor winding over Type of motor winding over Type of motor winding over-- --temperature protection, if specified: temperature protection, if specified: temperature protection, if specified: temperature protection, if specified:
Provide information on other motor features specified:
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 19 Project No. 149129
November 2016
43 05 11-A. MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION CERTIFICATION FORM
Contract No: Specification section:
Equipment name:
Contractor:
Manufacturer of equipment item:
The undersigned manufacturer of the equipment item described above hereby certifies that he has checked the
installation of the equipment and that the equipment, as specified in the project manual, has been provided in
accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, and that the trial operation of the equipment item has been
satisfactory.
Comments:
Manufacturer Contractor
Signature of Authorized Representative Signature of Authorized Representative
Date Date
WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion 43 23 52 .13 - 20 Project No. 149129
November 2016
43 05 11-B. MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION FORM
Contract No: Specification Section:
Equipment name:
Contractor:
Manufacturer of equipment item:
The undersigned manufacturer certifies that a service engineer has instructed the wastewater treatment plant operating
personnel in the proper maintenance and operation of the equipment designated herein.
Operations Check List (check appropriate spaces)
Start-up procedure reviewed
Shutdown procedure reviewed
Normal operation procedure reviewed
Others:
Maintenance Check List (check appropriate spaces)
Described normal oil changes (frequency)
Described special tools required
Described normal items to be reviewed for wear
Described preventive maintenance instructions
Described greasing frequency
Others:
Manufacturer Signature of Contractor Representative Date
Signature of Authorized Representative
Date Signature of Authorized Representative Date
E IDIAN
PURCHASING AGENT
33 East Broadway Avenue
Meridran, lO 83642
Pnone:20&888-4433 Fax: 208-887-4813
Date: 6/1 3/20"16
X Sole Source Item is available from only one vendor. ltem is one-of-a kind
item and is not sold through distributors. Manufacturer is a
sole distributor.
Refer to instructions on 2nd page for complelion
JUSTIFICATION: (Attach additional pages if needed)
lnfluent pumping is one of the initial steps in lhe treatment process for municipal wastewater. As such,
it is critical that these pumps be designed to pass solids through to downstream treatment processes
and be easy to maintain should a pump become plugged with debris. The influent pump station will be
designed to meel peak hour capacity with one pump out of service, so down time for maintenance
cannot be extended for lengthy durations.
Two types of influent pumping systems were considered for the Headworks Capacity Expansion
project: Hidrostal Submerslble Pumps with Prerostal lntake Basins and Vertical Turbine Solids
Handling (V|-SH) Pumps. While both systems have good capability of passing solids through to
downstream treatment processes, the Hid rostal Submersible Pumps offer th€ followng advantages to
the WSH Pumps:
Shallower pump station wet well as cleaning occurs within each pump's prerostal intake basrn.
WSH pumps require an ogee ramp to create a hydraulic jump for cleaning. lnstallation of the
ogee ramp adds depth to the pump stiation wet well.
Submersible Hidrostal pumps are more easily removed from the wet well for maintenance
purposes. The guiderail system will allow staff to pull the pumps for service with existing
maintenance equipment. VTSH pumps would require a crane to lift the pumps from the wet well
for access and maintenance purposes. Relying on crane removal/replacement of the pumps
could extend their down time period,
Submersible pumps do not require lubrication of the pump shaft beanngs as they are immersed
in water. Operations and maintenance staff have experienced freezing issues with a seal water
CITY OF TERIDIAN
SOLE SOURCE FORM
Item or Service: Hrdrostal lnfluent Submersible Pumps with Prerostal lntake Basins
lubrication system on existing wsH pumps at the WRRF. Utilizing Hidrostal pumps will
eliminate the need for a builjing enclosure or other means of freeze protection around the pump
station wet well.
Based on the comparison of Hidrostal and WSH pumPs, the Public Works Department recommends
procuring Hidrostal Submersible Pumps with Prerostal lntake Basins'
The Public Works Department requests a sole source procurement as there is no function equivalent
for the Hidrostal lnfluent Pump with Prerostal lntake Basin.
CERTIFICATION:
I am a!ryare of the requirements sel forlh in the Cily'6 Purchasing Policy & Procedu,es Manual for compstltivs bidding and the
eitabrisneO criteria tor iustitication for sole sourcuTsote UranO pr-rctrasing. I have gathered l8*nic3l.int:T?!ojr_?t)11"_1"_'"d'
"
*ni"1t"a
"tfon
fo ,*iew comparable/equal "qrhr"nr.
I hereby corlify as to the valldity of the inlormation 8nd leel confident
that lhis justilicalion for sol€ sou.celsole brand meets the City's criteria and is accurate'
V'lb
R tor (P ame)
Departme Manager Sign ure
Council Approval
Date:
Purchasing
Approval
Cxrlobel il
ManagerP
L1
L2
L3
FU1
FU2
FU3
1
2
3
1
2
3
LINE
REACTOR
480V
120V
UNIT
MAIN
DISCONNECT
R L1
S L2
T L3
PE
DIC INPUTS COMMON
X2X1
FAN
W
DI0 ENABLE
DI1 STOP
DI2 RUN
DI3 AUTO SPEED SEL
DI0 HAND
DI1 AUTO
PWR
DI2
DI4
DI5
R0NO
R0COM
R0NO
R0COM
R1NO
R1COM
AUTO RUN CMD
RUN/ACTIVE
FAIL
RELAY OUTPUT SLOT 5
RELAY OUTPUT SLOT 4
DIGITAL INPUTS SLOT 5
DIGITAL INPUTS SLOT 4
DIGITAL INPUTS MAIN
U
V
W
PE
T1
T2
T3
PE
10V+
+
-
10V-THERMOSTAT
CONTROL POWER ON
X00
X00
00X
00X
X00
00X
O
AH
B A
RO
RELAY 0 FROM VFD AUTO RUN
A
B
2CR
G RUNNING
PUMP FAIL
DIGITAL INPUTS SLOT 4
+24 VDC
COMMON
2
CR
1CR
HMI
BREAKER
IN MCC
480V
FOR E-NET CONNECTIONS,
SEE CONTROL SYSTEM
ARCHITECTURE DRAWINGS.
IP ADDRESSING ASSIGNED
BY THE CITY DURING
CONSTRUCTION
E-NET
OPTION
CARD
HS
DI3 HI MOTOR TEMP
CLEAR FAULTS DI4 CLEAR FAULTS
DI5 AUX FAULT
1
2
3
1
2
3
LOAD
REACTOR
VFD
ETHERNET
PORT 6
MELTRIC
PLUG
A
THERMISTOR RELAY
MOISTURE PROBE RELAY
1
CR
3
CR
MELTRIC
PLUG
MELTRIC
PLUG
3CR
PUMP MOISTURE
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
BEARING TEMP RELAY
MOISTURE FLOAT RELAY
1 2 3
1 2 3
3
3
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(A)
(C)
(B)
(D)
1
D
M
e
r
i
d
i
a
n
L
o
g
o
.
J
P
G
DATE
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTION
BC PROJECT NUMBER
FILENAME
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWING NUMBER
AT FULL SIZE
CHECKED:
APPROVED:
DRAWN:
MERIDIAN PROJECT NUMBER
DESIGNED:
REV
CHECKED:
2 3 4 5 6
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6
OF
D
C
B
A
LINE IS 2 INCHES
A
E N G I N E E R I N G
440 East Corporate Dr., Ste. 103
Meridian ID 83642
ph 208-288-2181
fax 208-288-2182
Pa
t
h
:
\\
D
C
E
\
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
2
0
1
6
\
1
6
B
R
O
0
1
-
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
W
W
T
P
H
E
A
D
W
O
R
K
S
E
L
E
C
\
C
A
D
D
F
I
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
E-
0
0
0
-
0
1
0
1
.
D
W
G
P
L
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
11
/
9
/
2
0
1
6
1
0
:
2
8
A
M
C
A
D
U
S
E
R
:
MA
R
C
P
R
I
D
E
City of Meridian
Wastewater Resource
Recovery Facility
Headworks
Capacity Expansion
PRELIMINARY
DESIGN - NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
----
149129
E-000-0101.DWG
DPB
JBB
MAP
JBB
E-000-0101
MOTOR CONTROL
SCHEMATIC
SHEET 1
ELECTRICAL
GENERAL SHEET NOTES
1.RELAYS, VFD ENCLOSURE AND ALL
COMPONENTS CONTAINED WITHIN ARE OWNER
FURNISHED, CONTRACTOR INSTALLED, UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE
ALL FIELD TERMINATIONS.
2.RELAYS AND METRIC PLUGS ARE LOCATED IN
NEMA 4X BOX AS SHOWN ON PLAN SHEET
E-105-0302.
3.INTRINSICALLY SAFE CIRCUITS. OWNER
FURNISHED RELAYS SHALL BE INTRINSICALLY
SAFE.
KEY NOTES:
1.MOTOR ELEMENTARY DIAGRAM SHOWN ON THIS
DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR THE EQUIPMENT
LISTED BELOW. THE VFD SHOWN ON THIS
DRAWING IS BASED ON ALLEN BRADLEY
POWERFLEX. PROVIDE EACH EQUIPMENT
MOTOR AS A SEPARATE ELEMENTARY DIAGRAM
MODIFIED AS NEEDED TO MEET PRODUCT
MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND THE
SPECIFIED FUNCTION.
2.WIRE NUMBERS TO MATCH RESPECTIVE
EQUIPMENT AREA LOOP NUMBERS. SEE
SPECIFICATIONS FOR WIRE LABELING
REQUIREMENTS.
3.SEE INFLUENT PUMP WIRING DIAGRAM ON
SHEET E-000-0201.
FOR THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS:
SIPS1PMP0001
SIPS1PMP0003
SIPS1PMP0005
SIPS1PMP0002
SIPS1PMP0004
SIPS1PMP0006
INFLUENT PUMP CONTROL SCHEMATIC
SCALE: N.T.S
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FY2017 BUDGET REQUESTS
The Fiscal Year Budget Enhancement Form workbook contains the necessary forms needed to submit all budgetary
requests for the fiscalyearannualbudget development process. The following information will help define the needs for
each budgetrequestform.
The included forms in this FiscalYearBudgetEnhancementForm workbookare:
E100 –Request for Budget Enhancement
G100 –Replacement Capital Form
G200 –Replacement Computer Request Form
G500 –Line Item Re-Allocation Form
H100 –Revenue Worksheet
I100 –Carry Forward
Inputinformation into aqua cellsand textboxes only! Manycells contain formula’s that can be broken if altered.
E100 – Request for Budget Enhancement
An enhancement is a request for additional personnel, opera ting expense or capital to perform a new service, solve a
problem or to provide the same service for an increased population. All related costs must be included in the
enhancement request.
Completing the form:
The E100 form contains six sections to manage the necessary data needed to communicate the enhancement request:
PersonnelCosts, Operating Costs, Capital Outlay, TotalEnhancement Cost-Lifetime, Enhancement Details, and Evaluation
Questions.
Personnel Costs:
This section will capture the requested amountof Personnel Costs associated with the BudgetEnhancementrequest. Be
sure to input the number of Full Time Equivalents (FTE) that you are requesting in the E100. The form will then calculate
the cost of taxesand benefits automatically based on the Wages and FTE’s.
Operating Costs:
This section will capture the requested amount of Operating Costs associated with the Budget Enhancement request.
Input the G/L# and G/L Description along with an amount for the requested Operating Costs. Enter the amount of the
Operating Costs into either the “On-Going” or “One-Time” columns. “On-Going” refers to any expenses that are
anticipated to continue beyond the 12-month period. “One-T ime” refers to anyexpenses thatneed to be expended once
and will not have any expensesbeyond the 12-month period.
It is important to include all costs associated with yourrequests. Forexample,adding positions usually requires office or
field supplies,training money,phone,furniture, acomputer, employee incentivemoney,etc.
Capital Outlay:
This section will capture the requested amount of Capital Outlay associated with the Budget Enhancement request.
Expenditures for equipment,construction, buildings, land,building and land improvements or furniture and fixtures over
$5,000 are capital. Input the G/L# and G/L Description along with an amountforthe requested CapitalOutlay. Allcapital
items are “One-Time” although they may have “On-Going” operating expenses. For example, a vehicle will have “On-
Going” operatingcosts for fuel, maintenance, insurance and repairs.
Total Enhancement Cost-Lifetime
This section will capture the prior year’s funding requests, current year request and future year’s fu nding requests associated
with the Budget Enhancement request.
Evaluation Questions
5/15/2017 instructions
Evaluation Questions
This section willcapture the requested information associated with the BudgetEnhancementrequest. Answers to these
questions arecritical! Why, whatand where the requestties to yourstrategic plans. Be CLEAR &CONCISE.
The IT department prior to submitting an enhancementformmustapprove all equipmentbeing supported on the City’s
network.
G100 –Replacement Capital Form
The G100 form is to requestthe replacement of operating orca pitalitems. The item mustbe worn outor obsolete to be
considered forreplacement.
For the originalasset, provide (if applicable): AssetTag Number; Asset Description; Date of Original Purchase; Condition
of OriginalAsset;Mileage as of March 30 forvehicles; Hours as of March 30 for equipment; Notes (additionalinformation
aboutthe assetthat mayassistin the decision to replace it).
G200 –Replacement Computer/Tablet/Printer Request F orm
The G200 form is to request the replacement of computers/tablets and printers. The Information Technology (IT)
department willcreate a listthatcontains the recommended replacement items for departments to review and approve.
IT will send the approved G200 form for each department to Finance. All departments are to meet with Information
Technology departmentto discuss allreplacementsas wella s anyotherhardware/softwareneeds/request.
G500 –Line Item Re-Allocation Form
The G500 formis to request budget dollars be moved from accountto anotherorfrom one division to another. Allowable
line item adjustments mustbe related to one anotherto be considered. For example, move Fuels from 3400 to 3410 is
acceptable. Forexample,move BuildingConstruction from 1850 to Personnelis notacceptable.
H100 –Revenue Worksheet
The H100form is to requestanyadjustmentsto Revenue if:
1. You expectto generaterevenue that has notpreviouslybeen appropriated. Thismight bethe resultof fees charged
foran additional program, a change in the rate structure,or an increase in the number of customers.
2. You expect a decrease in revenue. This might be the result of a decrease in customers using the service or the
elimination of a programor change in rate structure.
I100 –Carry Forward
The I100 form is to establish which capital/operating proje cts willnotbe finished in the currentfiscal yearand willne ed to
be carried over into the next fiscal year. The I100 form will be delivered to all departments in June. Total Enhancement
Cost-Lifetime
5/15/2017 instructions
5/
1
5
/
2
0
1
7
7
:
1
1
P
M
Ci
t
y
o
f
M
e
r
i
d
i
a
n
F
Y
2
0
1
7
B
u
d
g
e
t
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
F
o
r
m
(
E
-
10
0
)
P
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
C
o
s
t
s
F
u
l
l
T
i
m
e
E
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
(
F
T
E
)
:
Fu
n
d
#
D
e
p
t
.
#
G
/
L
#
P
r
o
j
.
#
T
o
t
a
l
6
0
3
5
9
0
4
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
4
4
6
0
3
5
9
0
4
1
2
0
6
1
0
0
4
4
6
0
3
5
9
0
4
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
4
4
6
0
3
5
9
0
4
1
3
0
4
1
0
0
4
4
6
0
3
5
9
0
4
2
0
2
1
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
6
0
3
5
9
0
4
2
0
2
2
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
Ti
t
l
e
:
6
0
3
5
9
0
4
2
0
2
3
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
N
a
m
e
:
6
0
3
5
9
0
4
2
0
2
5
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
i
n
g
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
N
a
m
e
:
To
t
a
l
P
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
C
o
s
t
s
-
$
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
#
:
3
5
9
0
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
6
0
Fu
n
d
#
D
e
p
t
.
#
G
/
L
#
P
r
o
j
.
#
O
n
e
-
T
i
m
e
O
n
-
G
o
i
n
g
T
o
t
a
l
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
#
:
2
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
CI
P
#
:
1
0
4
4
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
:
1
0
0
4
4
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
-
$
To
t
a
l
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
-
$
-
$
-
$
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
O
u
t
l
a
y
Fu
n
d
#
D
e
p
t
.
#
G
/
L
#
P
r
o
j
.
#
T
o
t
a
l
6
0
3
5
9
0
9
6
1
6
4
1
0
0
4
4
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
To
t
a
l
P
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
C
o
s
t
s
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
To
t
a
l
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
-
$
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
To
t
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
O
u
t
l
a
y
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
6
0
3
5
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
To
t
a
l
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
To
t
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
O
u
t
l
a
y
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
To
t
a
l
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
-
L
i
f
e
t
i
m
e
Pr
i
o
r
Y
e
a
r
(
s
)
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
F
i
s
c
a
l
Ye
a
r
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
N
a
m
e
:
To
t
a
l
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
-
$
-
$
-
$
Ti
t
l
e
:
G/
L
#
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
G/
L
#
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
G/
L
#
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
WR
R
F
H
e
a
d
w
o
r
k
s
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
O
d
o
r
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
Wa
g
e
s
P
T
/
S
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
W
a
g
e
s
O
v
e
r
t
i
m
e
Un
i
f
o
r
m
A
l
l
o
w
a
n
c
e
FI
C
A
P
E
R
S
I
Wo
r
k
e
r
'
s
C
o
m
p
Em
p
l
o
y
e
e
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
WR
R
F
H
e
a
d
w
o
r
k
s
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
O
d
o
r
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
He
a
d
w
o
r
k
s
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Pl
e
a
s
e
o
n
l
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
th
e
f
i
e
l
d
s
h
i
g
h
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
in
A
q
u
a
.
Ci
t
y
o
f
M
e
r
i
d
i
a
n
F
Y
2
0
1
7
B
u
d
g
e
t
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
F
o
r
m
(
E
-
10
0
)
C
:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
(
x
8
6
)
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
ro
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
F
E
A
8
4
6
6
2
-
9
4
3
8
-
4
8
1
8
-
8
9
F
D
-
3
9
A
2
7
D
4
B
C
5
B
3
\
M
er
i
d
i
a
n
.
2
9
1
2
.
1
.
F
Y
2
0
1
7
_
B
u
d
g
e
t
_
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
_
F
o
r
m
_
W
a
s
t
e
water_#2_WRRF_Headworks_Upgrades.xlsx
5/
1
5
/
2
0
1
7
7
:
1
1
P
M
Ci
t
y
o
f
M
e
r
i
d
i
a
n
F
Y
2
0
1
7
B
u
d
g
e
t
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
F
o
r
m
(
E
-
10
0
)
To
t
a
l
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
:
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
N
a
m
e
:
Pl
e
a
s
e
a
n
s
w
e
r
a
l
l
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
f
i
na
n
c
i
a
l
d
a
t
a
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
d
a
b
o
v
e
.
T
i
t
l
e
:
T
i
t
l
e
:
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
N
a
m
e
:
WR
R
F
H
e
a
d
w
o
r
k
s
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
O
d
o
r
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
WR
R
F
H
e
a
d
w
o
r
k
s
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
O
d
o
r
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
1.
D
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
w
h
a
t
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
a
n
d
w
h
y
.
I
f
t
he
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
b
a
s
i
c
e
x
p
l
an
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
j
o
b
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
I
f
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
co
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
o
r
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
f
e
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
c
o
p
e
o
f
w
o
r
k
.
I
f
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
e
q
ui
p
m
e
n
t
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
w
h
a
t
t
h
e
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
wi
l
l
b
e
u
s
e
d
f
o
r
.
I
f
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
ti
o
n
,
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
t
h
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
o
f
t
h
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
p
ro
j
e
c
t
.
Th
i
s
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
f
u
n
d
t
h
e
t
h
i
r
d
y
e
a
r
o
f
a
f
o
u
r
y
e
a
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
W
a
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
R
es
o
u
r
c
e
R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
h
e
a
d
w
o
r
k
s
t
h
a
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
n
o
d
o
r
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
h
e
a
d
w
o
r
k
s
,
i
n
f
l
u
e
n
t
f
l
o
w
m
ea
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
,
i
n
f
l
u
e
n
t
p
u
m
p
i
n
g
,
g
r
i
t
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
,
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
,
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
c
l
a
r
i
f
i
e
r
o
d
o
r
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
,
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
cl
a
r
i
f
i
e
r
p
u
m
p
s
a
n
d
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
,
a
n
d
a
s
e
a
l
w
a
t
e
r
p
u
m
p
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
he
f
i
r
m
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
h
e
a
d
w
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
b
e
t
t
e
r
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
u
p
s
t
r
e
a
m
o
f
f
u
t
u
r
e
n
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
c
e
ss
e
s
.
T
h
e
n
e
w
s
c
r
e
e
n
s
w
i
l
l
r
e
m
o
v
e
d
e
b
r
i
s
u
p
s
t
r
e
a
m
i
n
t
h
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
m
a
k
e
s
o
l
i
d
s
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
tr
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
n
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
s
m
o
r
e
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
.
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
f
u
t
u
r
e
s
i
d
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
t
r
e
at
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
b
i
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
n
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
a
n
t
i
ci
p
a
t
e
d
f
o
r
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
E
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
(
N
P
DE
S
)
P
e
r
m
i
t
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
.
Th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
H
u
b
e
r
S
t
e
p
S
c
r
e
e
n
s
h
a
v
e
n
o
t
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
we
l
l
d
u
r
i
n
g
c
o
l
d
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
W
a
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
Di
v
i
s
i
o
n
h
a
s
m
a
d
e
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
k
e
e
p
t
h
e
m
f
r
o
m
fr
e
e
z
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
w
i
n
t
e
r
t
i
m
e
.
T
h
e
s
e
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
a
v
e
m
a
d
e
i
t
d
i
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
a
n
d
t
i
m
e
c
o
n
s
u
m
i
n
g
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
th
e
m
.
W
h
e
n
f
l
o
w
s
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
t
h
e
s
c
r
e
e
ns
r
u
n
co
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
l
y
,
a
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
m
o
r
e
s
o
l
i
d
s
t
o
p
a
s
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
.
T
h
i
s
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
s
N
P
D
E
S
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
la
n
N
o
.
2
6
.
2.
D
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
m
e
t
h
o
d
o
f
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
?
I
f
f
u
n
d
in
g
i
s
s
p
l
i
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
F
u
n
d
s
(
i
.
e
.
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
,
E
n
t
e
r
p
r
i
se
,
G
r
a
n
t
)
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
t
h
e
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
s
p
l
i
t
.
L
is
t
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
s
a
n
d
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
o
f
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
ev
e
n
u
e
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
f
r
o
m
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
st
.
En
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e
F
u
n
d
3.
D
o
e
s
t
h
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
a
l
i
g
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
/
C
i
t
y
'
s
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
p
l
a
n
?
I
f
n
o
t
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
h
o
w
t
h
i
s
r
e
qu
e
s
t
w
a
s
n
o
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
/
C
i
t
y
Ye
s
WW
-
1
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
e
m
p
l
o
y
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
E
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
.
WW
-
6
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
i
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
W
a
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
T
r
e
a
t
m
en
t
P
l
a
n
t
4.
D
o
e
s
t
h
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
t
o
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
de
d
b
y
o
t
h
e
r
d
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
?
I
f
y
e
s
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
t
h
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
t
o
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
o
t
h
e
r
Th
e
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
i
n
g
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
a
s
s
i
s
t
i
n
b
i
d
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
f
o
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
5.
D
o
e
s
t
h
i
s
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
n
y
n
e
e
d
e
d
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
o
r
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
t
h
a
t
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
?
(
Y
e
s
or
No
6.
A
n
y
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
?
Ci
t
y
o
f
M
e
r
i
d
i
a
n
F
Y
2
0
1
7
B
u
d
g
e
t
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
F
o
r
m
(
E
-
10
0
)
C
:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
(
x
8
6
)
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
ro
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
F
E
A
8
4
6
6
2
-
9
4
3
8
-
4
8
1
8
-
8
9
F
D
-
3
9
A
2
7
D
4
B
C
5
B
3
\
M
er
i
d
i
a
n
.
2
9
1
2
.
1
.
F
Y
2
0
1
7
_
B
u
d
g
e
t
_
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
_
F
o
r
m
_
W
a
s
t
e
water_#2_WRRF_Headworks_Upgrades.xlsx
CI
T
Y
o
f
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
:
2
0
1
7
G1
0
0
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
/
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
:
As
s
e
t
Da
t
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ac
c
t
T
a
g
A
s
s
e
t
t
o
b
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
o
f
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
o
f
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
M
i
l
e
a
g
e
C
o
s
t
f
o
r
Co
d
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
s
s
e
t
E
q
u
i
p
.
H
o
u
r
s
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
TO
T
A
L
S
-
$
Notes
G1
0
0
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
/
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
5/
1
5
/
2
0
1
7
G100
CI
T
Y
o
f
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
:
2
0
1
7
G2
0
0
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
/
T
a
b
l
e
t
/
P
r
i
n
t
e
r
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
F
o
r
m
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
:
As
s
e
t
Ac
c
t
T
a
g
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
b
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
Co
d
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
TO
T
A
L
S
-
$
G2
0
0
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
F
o
r
m
Th
i
s
f
o
r
m
t
o
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
b
y
I
T
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
o
r
a
n
d
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
d
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
i
r
b
u
d
g
e
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Co
s
t
o
f
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l
A
s
s
e
t
Da
t
e
o
f
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
Notes
5/
1
5
/
2
0
1
7
G200
CI
T
Y
o
f
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
:
2
0
1
7
G5
0
0
-
L
i
n
e
I
t
e
m
R
e
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
:
FR
O
M
T
O
D
o
l
l
a
r
A
m
o
u
n
t
AC
C
O
U
N
T
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
/
CO
D
E
C
O
D
E
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
m
o
u
n
t
(
D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
)
TO
T
A
L
S
$0
$
0
**
U
s
e
t
w
o
l
i
n
e
s
p
e
r
t
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
.
O
n
e
l
i
n
e
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
F
r
o
m
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
o
t
h
e
r
l
i
n
e
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
T
o
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
.
**
*
B
o
t
h
l
i
n
e
s
w
i
l
l
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
i
r
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
b
u
d
g
e
t
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
r
D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
t
o
i
t
.
G5
0
0
-
L
i
n
e
I
t
e
m
R
e
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
Re
a
s
o
n
f
o
r
C
h
a
n
g
e
5/
1
5
/
2
0
1
7
G500
CI
T
Y
o
f
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
Fiscal Year: 2017
H1
0
0
-
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
Department:
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Ac
c
t
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
o
D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
o
Co
d
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
To
t
a
l
s
-
$
-
$
to
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
H1
0
0
-
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
Reason
fo
r
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
r
D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
5/
1
5
/
2
0
1
7
H100
CI
T
Y
o
f
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
Fiscal Year: 2017
I1
0
0
-
C
a
r
r
y
F
o
r
w
a
r
d
Department:
FY
2
0
1
4
F
Y
2
0
1
4
F
Y
2
0
1
5
Ac
c
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
S
p
e
n
t
t
o
A
m
o
u
n
t
t
o
Co
d
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
A
m
o
u
n
t
D
a
t
e
C
a
r
r
y
F
o
r
w
a
r
d
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
TO
T
A
L
S
-
$
Estimate Date of Completion
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
i
s
"
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
"
5/
1
5
/
2
0
1
7
I100
FY
2
0
1
7
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
&
P
r
i
n
t
e
r
C
o
s
t
s
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
B
u
d
g
e
t
A
m
o
u
n
t
HA
R
D
W
A
R
E
Ne
w
D
e
s
k
t
o
p
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
(
1
)
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
$
1
,
6
0
0
Ne
w
L
a
p
t
o
p
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
$
1
,
9
5
0
Ne
w
T
a
b
l
e
t
P
C
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
I
T
Ne
w
P
r
i
n
t
e
r
-
S
i
n
g
l
e
P
e
r
s
o
n
-
B
l
a
c
k
a
n
d
W
h
i
t
e
$
3
0
0
Ne
w
P
r
i
n
t
e
r
-
S
i
n
g
l
e
P
e
r
s
o
n
-
C
o
l
o
r
$
5
0
0
Ne
w
D
e
s
k
t
o
p
L
C
D
S
c
r
e
e
n
-
2
4
"
$
1
3
0
Ai
r
C
a
r
d
A
n
n
u
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
$
5
2
0
*
I
f
y
o
u
n
e
e
d
p
r
i
c
i
n
g
f
o
r
s
o
m
e
t
h
i
n
g
n
o
t
o
n
t
h
i
s
l
i
s
t
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
I
T
.
**
A
l
l
c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
s
a
r
e
a
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
W
e
b
e
l
i
e
v
e
t
h
e
s
e
m
a
c
h
i
n
e
s
w
i
l
l
wo
r
k
e
q
u
a
l
l
y
w
e
l
l
f
o
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
c
o
m
m
o
n
d
e
s
k
t
o
p
u
s
e
r
s
.
I
f
y
o
u
n
e
e
d
a
mo
r
e
p
o
w
e
r
f
u
l
m
a
c
h
i
n
e
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
I
T
f
o
r
p
r
i
c
i
n
g
.
5/
1
5
/
2
0
1
7
computer costs
FROM ROCK TRAP
MANHOLE
72" RS
a
TO IPS FORCE MAIN
HEADER
36" RS
SIPS1PMP0001
INFLUENT PUMP 1
SPEC:
SIPS1SGT0001
LIT
0001
PI
0001
SIPS1VAL0001
SIPS1VAL0002
12
"
R
S
1" RS
SIPS1PMP0002
INFLUENT PUMP 2
SPEC:
SIPS1VAL0003
SIPS1VAL0004
16
"
R
S
1" RS
b
TO IPS FORCE MAIN
36" RS
36" RS
36" RS
CONTINUED
ON
SIPS1PLC0001
ES480/3/60
YQ
0002
RUN
YL
0002
RUN
ZL
0002
AUTO
YA
0002
FAULT
SC
0002
SPEED
CNTRL
E
SIPS1VFD0002
TEMP
HIGH
SI
0002
DRIVE
SPEED
II
0002
DRIVE
AMPS
ES480/3/60
YQ
0001
RUN
YL
0001
RUN
ZL
0001
AUTO
YA
0001
FAULT
SC
0001
SPEED
CNTRL
E
SIPS1VFD0001
TEMP
HIGH
SI
0001
DRIVE
SPEED
II
0001
DRIVE
AMPS LEAK
LI
0001
LEVEL
LE
0001
MAH
0001
MAH
0002
LEAK
TSH
0001
10
"
R
S
MSH
0001
PI
0002
TSH
0002 B
12
"
R
S
MSH
0002 B
TAH
0001
TAH
0002
20
"
R
S
20
"
R
S
JA
0001
TVSS
SIPS1MDP0001
JS
0001
LEVEL
LAHH
0002
LAH
0001
LSH
0001
LSHH
0002
LIT
0002
LI
0002
LEVEL
LE
0002
SIPS1LIT0001 SIPS1LIT0002
TSH
0002 A
MSH
0002 A
1
D
DATE
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTION
BC PROJECT NUMBER
FILENAME
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWING NUMBER
AT FULL SIZE
CHECKED:
APPROVED:
DRAWN:
MERIDIAN PROJECT NUMBER
DESIGNED:
REV
CHECKED:
2 3 4 5 6
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6
OF
D
C
B
A
LINE IS 2 INCHES
A
Pa
t
h
:
\\
B
C
S
E
A
F
P
0
1
\
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
,
C
I
T
Y
O
F
\
1
4
9
1
2
9
-
H
E
A
D
W
O
R
K
S
\
_
C
A
D
\
2
-
S
H
E
E
T
S
\
I
-
P
I
D
F
I
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
I-
1
0
5
-
0
0
0
1
.
D
W
G
P
L
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
11
/
9
/
2
0
1
6
8
:
4
0
A
M
C
A
D
U
S
E
R
:
AR
T
E
M
C
H
E
K
H
O
V
S
K
I
Y
City of Meridian
Wastewater Resource
Recovery Facility
Headworks
Capacity Expansion
149129
I-105-0001.DWG
DPB
SMP
ADH
MJW
INFLUENT PMP STA
1 OF 3
INSTRUMENTATION
1.PLC I/O PREFACED WITH FULL EQUIPMENT
NUMBER, SUCH AS "SIPSLIT0001-LI" FOR LEVEL
INDICATION REFER TO SECTION 25 06 30.85 FOR
FULL INSTRUMENT NUMBER.
GENERAL SHEET NOTES
KEY NOTES:
1.MOUNT TRANSMITTER BELOW SERVICE
HATCH.
2. SUPPLIED EQUIPMENT.
1 1
2 2
2 2
VENDOR
FIGURE 1
EQUIPMENT
PRE-PROCUREMENT
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
43 23 52.13 43 23 52.13
FIGURE 2 A
FIGURE 2 B
FIGURE 2
a
TO IPS FORCE MAIN
HEADER
36" RS
SIPS1PMP0003
INFLUENT PUMP 3
SPEC:
SIPS1VAL0005
SIPS1VAL0006
16
"
R
S
1" RS
SIPS1PMP0004
INFLUENT PUMP 4
SPEC:
SIPS1VAL0008
SIPS1VAL0009
16
"
R
S
1" RS
b
TO IPS FORCE MAIN
36" RS
36" RS
CONTINUED
ON
ES480/3/60
SIPS1PLC0001
YQ
0004
RUN
YL
0004
RUN
ZL
0004
AUTO
YA
0004
FAULT
SC
0004
SPEED
CNTRL
E
SIPS1VFD0004
TEMP
HIGH
SI
0004
DRIVE
SPEED
II
0004
DRIVE
AMPS
ES480/3/60
YQ
0003
RUN
YL
0003
RUN
ZL
0003
AUTO
YA
0003
FAULT
SC
0003
SPEED
CNTRL
E
SIPS1VFD0003
TEMP
HIGH
SI
0003
DRIVE
SPEED
II
0003
DRIVE
AMPS
MAH
0003
LEAK
MAH
0004
LEAK
PI
0003
TSH
0003 B
12
"
R
S
MSH
0003 B
PI
0004
TSH
0004 B
12
"
R
S
MSH
0004 B
TAH
0003
TAH
0004
A
TO IPS FORCE MAIN
HEADER
36" RS
B
TO IPS FORCE MAIN
36" RS
CONTINUED
20
"
R
S
20
"
R
S
SIPS1VAL0007
SIPS1VAL0019
1-1/2" RS
SIPS1VAL0021
SIPS1VAL0018
4" RS
SIPS1VAL0017
SIPS1VAL0020
SIPS1VAL0016
D D
1-1/2" RS
TSH
0003
A
MSH
0003 A
TSH
0004
A
MSH
0004 A
1
D
DATE
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTION
BC PROJECT NUMBER
FILENAME
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWING NUMBER
AT FULL SIZE
CHECKED:
APPROVED:
DRAWN:
MERIDIAN PROJECT NUMBER
DESIGNED:
REV
CHECKED:
2 3 4 5 6
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6
OF
D
C
B
A
LINE IS 2 INCHES
A
Pa
t
h
:
\\
B
C
S
E
A
F
P
0
1
\
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
,
C
I
T
Y
O
F
\
1
4
9
1
2
9
-
H
E
A
D
W
O
R
K
S
\
_
C
A
D
\
2
-
S
H
E
E
T
S
\
I
-
P
I
D
F
I
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
I-
1
0
5
-
0
0
0
2
.
D
W
G
P
L
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
11
/
9
/
2
0
1
6
8
:
4
0
A
M
C
A
D
U
S
E
R
:
AR
T
E
M
C
H
E
K
H
O
V
S
K
I
Y
City of Meridian
Wastewater Resource
Recovery Facility
Headworks
Capacity Expansion
149129
I-105-0002.DWG
DPB
SMP
ADH
MJW
INFLUENT PMP STA
2 OF 3
INSTRUMENTATION
1.PLC I/O PREFACED WITH FULL EQUIPMENT
NUMBER, SUCH AS "SIPSLIT0001-LI" FOR LEVEL
INDICATION REFER TO SECTION 25 06 30.85 FOR
FULL INSTRUMENT NUMBER.
GENERAL SHEET NOTES
KEY NOTES:
1.SUPPLIED EQUIPMENT.
1 1
1 1
VENDOR
FIGURE 2
EQUIPMENT
PRE-PROCUREMENT
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
43 23 52.13 43 23 52.13
ON FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3
FIGURE 1 a
FIGURE 1 b
FIGURE 3 A
FIGURE 3 B
A
FROM IPS FORCE
MAIN HEADER
36" RS
SIPS1PMP0005
INFLUENT PUMP 5
SPEC:
PI
0005
SIPS1VAL0010
SIPS1VAL0011
16
"
R
S
1" RS
SIPS1PMP0006
INFLUENT PUMP 6
SPEC:
PI
0006
SIPS1VAL0012
SIPS1VAL0013
12
"
R
S
1" RS
B
FROM IPS
FORCE MAIN
36" RS
36" RS
CONTINUED
ON
TO INFLUENT
SCREENS
TO INFLUENT
SCREENS
SIPS1VAL0014
SIPS1VAL0015
FIT
0001
FE
0001
36" RS 36" RS
36" RS 36" RS
TRANSITION
TO BURIED
HDPE
INFLUENT PUMP STATION WET WELL
ES480/3/60
SIPS1PLC0001
YQ
0006
RUN
YL
0006
RUN
ZL
0006
AUTO
YA
0006
FAULT
SC
0006
SPEED
CNTRL
E
SIPS1VFD0006
TEMP
HIGH
SI
0006
DRIVE
SPEED
II
0006
DRIVE
AMPS
ES480/3/60
YQ
0005
RUN
YL
0005
RUN
ZL
0005
AUTO
YA
0005
FAULT
SC
0005
SPEED
CNTRL
E
SIPS1VFD0005
TEMP
HIGH
SI
0005
DRIVE
SPEED
II
0005
DRIVE
AMPS
FI
0001
FLOW
FQ
0001
FLOW
TOTAL
FIT
0002
FI
0002
FLOW
FQ
0002
FLOW
TOTAL
M
FE
0002
M
20" RS
20" RS
36" RS
TSH
0005
B
12
"
R
S
MSH
0005
B
TSH
0006
10
"
R
S
MSH
0006
MAH
0005
LEAK
TAH
0005
MAH
0006
LEAK
TAH
0006
20
"
R
S
20
"
R
S
1.PLC I/O PREFACED WITH FULL EQUIPMENT
NUMBER, SUCH AS "SIPSLIT0001-LI" FOR
LEVEL INDICATION REFER TO SECTION 25
06 30.85 FOR FULL INSTRUMENT NUMBER.
GENERAL SHEET NOTES
ES120VAC
ES 120VAC
SIPS1FIT0002
SIPS1FIT0001
SHDW1PLC001
TSH
0005
A
MSH
0005
A
1
D
DATE
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTION
BC PROJECT NUMBER
FILENAME
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWING NUMBER
AT FULL SIZE
CHECKED:
APPROVED:
DRAWN:
MERIDIAN PROJECT NUMBER
DESIGNED:
REV
CHECKED:
2 3 4 5 6
C
B
1 2 3 4 5 6
OF
D
C
B
A
LINE IS 2 INCHES
A
Pa
t
h
:
\\
B
C
S
E
A
F
P
0
1
\
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
M
E
R
I
D
I
A
N
,
C
I
T
Y
O
F
\
1
4
9
1
2
9
-
H
E
A
D
W
O
R
K
S
\
_
C
A
D
\
2
-
S
H
E
E
T
S
\
I
-
P
I
D
F
I
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
I-
1
0
5
-
0
0
0
3
.
D
W
G
P
L
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
11
/
9
/
2
0
1
6
8
:
4
1
A
M
C
A
D
U
S
E
R
:
AR
T
E
M
C
H
E
K
H
O
V
S
K
I
Y
City of Meridian
Wastewater Resource
Recovery Facility
Headworks
Capacity Expansion
149129
I-105-0003.DWG
DPB
SMP
ADH
MJW
INFLUENT PMP STA
3 OF 3
INSTRUMENTATION
KEY NOTES:
1. SUPPLIED EQUIPMENT.
11
11
VENDOR
FIGURE 3
EQUIPMENT
PRE-PROCUREMENT
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
43 23 52.13 43 23 52.13
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2 a
FIGURE 2 b
March 24
7R 7UR\7KUDOO3(
6WDII(QJLQHHU,,:DVWHZDWHU
&LW\RI0HULGLDQ3XEOLF:RUNV'HSDUWPHQW
(%UHDGZD\$YH0HULGLDQ,'
5H 3URSRVDO IRU,363XPS6WDWLRQ
&LW\RI 0HULGLDQ,'
0HULGLDQ,':55)+HDGZRUNV&DSDFLW\([SDQVLRQ3URMHFW,QIOXHQW3XPS6WDWLRQ
(QJLQHHU %URZQDQG&DOGZHOO
<RXUVYHU\WUXO\
-RH.HUQNDPS
3UHVLGHQW
$36&2 //&
MNHUQNDPS#DSVFROOFFRP
There will beBBB24 total pages including this cover sheet
$36&2//&ZLOO EHRIIHULQJWKHIROORZLQJHTXLSPHQWIRU WKH&LW\ RI0HULGLDQ,363URMHFW
6HFWLRQ /RZ9ROWDJH$GMXVWDEOH)UHTXHQF\'ULYHV
0DQXIDFWXUHU ± 5RFNZHOO$XWRPDWLRQ
(TXLSPHQW7DJ1XPEHUV 6,369)'6,369)'6,369)'
6,369)'6,369)'6,369)'
6HFWLRQ ,PPHUVLEOH:HW3LW 9DULDEOH6SHHG6FUHZ&HQWULIXJDO3XPSVDQG
,QWDNH%DVLQV
0DQXIDFWXUHU ± +LGURVWDO
(TXLSPHQW7DJ1XPEHUV 3XPSV 6,363036,363036,36303
6,363036,36303 6,36303 ZLWK%DVLQV0RLVWXUH3UREHVDQG
7KHUPLVWRUV
3OHDVHUHIHUWRWKHDWWDFKHGGHWDLOHG3URSRVDO3OHDVHFRQWDFWRXURIILFHLI\RXKDYHDQ\
TXHVWLRQV
1BZNFOUBOE%FMJWFSZ4DIFEVMF
1BZNFOU5FSNT
10PGUPUBMVQPOBQQSPWFE4VCNJUUBMT
PGUPUBMVQPO"DDFQUFE'BDUPSZ8JUOFTTUFTUJOH1BSUJBMBMMPXFE
70PGUPUBMVQPO%FMJWFSZUP+PCTJUF UPBMMPXQBSUJBMJOWPJDJOH
PGUPUBMVQPO4UBSUVQBOE5FTUJOH1SPSBUBBTDPNQMFUFE/PUUPFYDFFE
EBZTGSPNTIJQNFOU
PGUPUBMVQPOBDDFQUBODFPGPQFSBUJPOBMBOENBJOUFOBODFNBOVBMT/PUUP
FYDFFEEBZTGSPNGSPN4IJQNFOU
1BZNFOUUFSNT/FUEBZT
*Supply bond to be provided.
5FSNTBOE$POEJUJPOT
1SJDJOHJTQFS"14$0--$5FSNTBOE$POEJUJPOTBUUBDIFE"OZDIBOHFJO
TDPQFPGTVQQMZPSDPNNFSDJBMUFSNTNBZSFRVJSFNPEJGJFEQSJDJOH4FF
"UUBDIFE
'SFJHIU
"MMFRVJQNFOUJTRVPUFE'0#KPCTJUFGSFJHIUBMMPXFE$POUSBDUPSPS0XOFS
SFRVJSFEUPPGGMPBEBOEQSPQFSMZTUPSFFRVJQNFOU
%FMJWFSZ
4VCNJUUBMTXFFLTBGUFSSFDFJQUPGPSEFSBOETJHOFEDPOUSBDU
1VNQTXFFLT"GUFSBQQSPWFE4VCNJUUBMT
7'%XFFLTBGUFSBQQSPWFETVCNJUUBMT
&NCFEEFE.BUFSJBM8FFLT
4FFBUUBDIFEQSPQPTFEQSPKFDUEFMJWFSZTDIFEVMF
&YDMVTJPOT
"OZUIJOHOPUTQFDJGJDBMMZMJTUFEPSOBNFEJOUIFTDPQFPGTVQQMZXJMMOPUCF
QSPWJEFE1SJDJOHEPFTOPUJODMVEFBOZGJFMEHBVHFT
GJFMEUFTUJOH
BODIPSCPMUT
JOTUBMMBUJPO
QJQJOH
GJFMEBMJHONFOUPSPUIFSTFSWJDFTTQFDJGJDBMMZMJTUFE1SJDF
EPFTOPUJODMVEFUBYFTPGBOZLJOE
EVUJFTPSCPOETJGSFRVJSFE
7BMJEJUZ
1SJDJOHWBMJEEBZTBGUFSUIFCJEEBUF"14$0SFTFSWFTUIFSJHIUUPBEKVTU
QSJDJOHGPSBOZDIBOHFTJOTDPQFPGTVQQMZPSDIBOHFTJODPNNFSDJBMUFSNT
3URMHFW::55)+HDGZRUNV&DSDFLW\([SDQVLRQ0HULGLDQ,'
6HFWLRQ: /2:92/7$*($'-867$%/()5(48(1&<'5,9(6
Pump
SIPS1PMP000
1
1 PF753 6 pulse 60 77 HD 480VAC WL-K1USI20022-0096 %RWWRP
Pump
SIPS1PMP000
6
1 PF753 6 pulse 60 77 HD 480VAC WL-K1USI20022-0096 %RWWRP
Pump
SIPS1PMP000
2
1 PF753 6 pulse 125 156 HD 480VAC WL-K1USI20022-0186 %RWWRP
Pump
SIPS1PMP000
3
1 PF753 6 pulse 125 156 HD 480VAC WL-K1USI20022-0186 %RWWRP
Pump
SIPS1PMP000
4
1 PF753 6 pulse 125 156 HD 480VAC WL-K1USI20022-0186 %RWWRP
Pump
SIPS1PMP000
5
1 PF753 6 pulse 125 156 HD 480VAC WL-K1USI20022-0186 %RWWRP
**ND – (110% Overload for 60 seconds)
**HD – (150% Overload for 60 seconds repeated every 10 min)
*18 pulse design includes Aluminum transformer as standard
9)'6&23(2)6833/<
This proposal is for the supply of Variable Frequency Drives for the WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion , Meridian,ID
Project. The scope of supply is for the relevant sections of the specification limited to the items listed within this proposal and
subject to the clarifications, exceptions and Rockwell Automation Terms & Conditions of Sale.
Tag Qty Type Bridge*
Drive
HP
Drive
Amps
Rating
**
Input
Voltage Preliminary Dimensions Cable Entry Cable Exit
/RZ9ROWDJH9)'
(48,30(177$*180%(56 6,369)'6,369)'6,369)'
6,369)'6,369)'6,369)'
%RWWRP
%RWWRP
%RWWRP
%RWWRP
%RWWRP
%RWWRP
VFD Product Details:- Influent Pump (SIPS1PMP0001, SIPS1PMP0006)
Enclosure NEMA type 1G enclosure (12-gauge minimum)
1 HIM
1 Door Mounted Name Plate
1 Input Reactor 5%
1 Output Reactor 3%
1 6 pulse design
1 Control Transformer
2 Primary Fuse-Control Transformer
1 Secondary Fuse-Control Transformer
3 Control relay
0 Time Delay relay
1 Ethernet/IP communication card
2 I/O Card
1 H.O.A. S/S (6 Aux. contact)
1 Thermostat
4 Control Fuse
1 PB(Reset)
3 Pilot Light
3 Line fuse
1 Fuse Disconnect Switch (meet UL requirements)
1 Fan/Filter
1 Mechanical Door interlock
VFD Product Details:- Influent Pump (SIPS1PMP0002, SIPS1PMP0003, SIPS1PMP0004, SIPS1PMP0005)
Enclosure NEMA type 1G enclosure (12-gauge minimum)
1 HIM
1 Door Mounted Name Plate
1 Input Reactor 5%
1 Output Reactor 3%
1 6 pulse design
1 Control Transformer
2 Primary Fuse-Control Transformer
1 Secondary Fuse-Control Transformer
3 Control relay
0 Time Delay relay
1 Ethernet/IP communication card
2 I/O Card
1 H.O.A. S/S (6 Aux. contact)
1 Thermostat
4 Control Fuse
1 PB(Reset)
3 Pilot Light
3 Line fuse
1 Fuse Disconnect Switch (meet UL requirements)
1 Fan/Filter
1 Mechanical Door interlock
VFD Product Details:- Influent Pump&RQW
G (SIPS1PMP0002, SIPS1PMP0003, SIPS1PMP0004, SIPS1PMP0005)
Exceptions to Specification 262923
Clarification/Exception
ϮϲϮϵϮϯͲϭ͘ϬϮ ^KhZ Yh>/dzKEdZK> džĐĞƉƚŝŽŶ͗ZƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐĂŶĚWƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐĂƉƉůLJ͘EŽŽƚŚĞƌĐƵƐƚŽŵƚĞƐƚŝŶŐǁŝůůďĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƐĐŽƉĞ͘
ϮϲϮϵϮϯͲϭ͘Ϭϯ ^hD/dd>^ ůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗Z^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ^ƵďŵŝƚƚĂůƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƌŝǀĞƐǁŝůůďĞƐƵƉƉůŝĞĚǁŝůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ͕ƐŽŵĞŝƚĞŵƐƵŶĚĞƌƚŚŝƐĐĂƚĞŐŽƌLJŝƐďLJƚŚĞĐŽŶƚĂĐƚŽƌ͘
ϮϲϮϵϮϯͲϭ͘Ϭϰ KKZ/Ed/KE džĐĞƉƚŝŽŶ͗EŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƐĐŽƉĞ͘LJŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘
ϮϲϮϵϮϯͲϮ͘ϬϮͲ'ͲϭͲ
/
&ŝŶŝƐŚ͗WĂŝŶƚĨŝŶŝƐŚƐŚĂůůďĞE^/'ƌĞLJ͘ ůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗WĂŶĞůĐŽůŽƌĂŶĚĐŚĞŵŝƐƚƌLJĂƌĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉĂŶĞůŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌĞƌ͘
ϮϲϮϵϮϯͲϯ͘Ϭϭ /E^d>>d/KE džĐĞƉƚŝŽŶ͗EŽ/ŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƐĐŽƉĞ͕ďLJŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘
ϮϲϮϵϮϯͲϯ͘ϬϮ DEh&dhZ Z͛^^ Zs/ ^ džĐĞƉƚŝŽŶ͗Z^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ^ƚĂƌƚͲhƉΘdƌĂŝŶŝŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƐĐŽƉĞ͘ŶLJŽƚŚĞƌƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚǁŝůůŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞƋƵŽƚĞĚůŽĐĂůůLJ͘
'ĞŶĞƌĂů ,ĂƌŵŽŶŝĐ ůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ZŽĐŬǁĞůůƐƵƉƉůŝĞĚŝŶƉƵƚϱйƌĞĂĐƚŽƌƉĞƌZĞƋƵĞƐƚĂŶĚŽŶĞͲůŝŶĞ͕ZŽĐŬǁĞůůĐĂŶŶŽƚŐƵĂƌĂŶƚĞĞƚŚĞĚƌŝǀĞƐǁŝůůŵĞĞƚ/ Ͳϱϭϵ͘
'ĞŶĞƌĂů DŽŝƐƚƵƌĞ&ůŽĂƚZĞůĂLJ͕ŵŽŝƐƚƵƌĞ͕ƉƌŽďĞ͕ƚŚĞƌŵŝƐƚŽƌ
ƌĞůĂLJ͕ďĞĂƌŝŶŐƌĞůĂLJĂŶĚDĞůƚƌŝĐƉůƵŐ
džĐĞƉƚŝŽŶ͗dŚĞƐĞŝƚĞŵƐĂƌĞŶŽƚŝŶZŽĐŬǁĞůůΖƐƐĐŽƉĞŽĨƐƵƉƉůLJ͘
'ĞŶĞƌĂů ůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ƐƐƵŵĞƚŚĂƚŽƵƚƉƵƚĨŝůƚĞƌŝƐĂůůƚŚĂƚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌ>ĞĂĚůĞŶŐƚŚĨƌŽŵĚƌŝǀĞƚŽŵŽƚŽƌ͘
'ĞŶĞƌĂů ^ĞĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĐůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĞůŽǁ
Additional Design and Application Clarifications
• All Customer-Furnished Equipment (CFE) and Customer-Specified Material (CSM) will meet all applicable material restrictions as defined in RoHS If it does not Customer will
Motor FLA is required in order to properly size the drives. If FLA is not available at the time of the proposal, VFD’s are sized based on HP requested using NEC 2014 Table 430250
data Ifmotor data is received at a later date which increases the size of the VFD’s Rockwell Automation reserves the right to increase pricing accordingly
Local code is not in the scope of the VFD supplier.
The drives have adjustable carrier frequency of 2-10 KHz. The drive ratings are based on 4 KHz setting.
Rockwell Automation packaged drives are rated for 1000m, at 0-40 deg C
Labor, equipment, and materials required for installation are not in the scope of the VFD supplier.
Power and motor cable termination lugs are the responsibility of the purchaser, not Rockwell Automation.
Wire markers, if required by spec, are sleeve-type and applied to customer wiring points only.
Rockwell Automation drives have a +/- 10% voltage tolerance. See Pub 20B-UM001_-EN-P for full details.
Power factor correction caps should not be used with Rockwell Automation drives.
Rockwell Automation standard test process and procedure are included with this proposal.
Motor design, cable lead length and type are required in order to determine if DV/DT filters are required in the design. If information is received post proposal, and it is
Rockwell Automation VFD PCB connections are not all gold plated.
Drive modules are run-in tested prior to shipment to Rockwell Automation, no additional run-in is included.
The door mounted HIM is not available with a keypad key switch
Non current carrying parts will be painted with a Rockwell Automation standard paint color.
Field testing and the equipment to perform the required field testing is not in the scope of the VFD manufacturer.
The HIM backlight and DC bus parameter can provide indication that the bus is charged.
When sizing drive/motor combinations, Rockwell Automation assumes that inverter duty motors have a service factor of 1.0 when run on VFD power, in accordance with
Any customer supplied equipment shipped to a RA facility will be subject to a mounting and handling fee.
Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS)
Addenda, Clarifications and Exceptions to Commercial T&C’s
For the scope of equipment outlined in this proposal, prices noted are in USD funds. Prices exclude freight, duty and taxes unless otherwise specified.
This quotation is valid for 30 days after proposal generation date. Scope of supply will be built as defined by this proposal. Should errors and omissions be
identified they will be quoted as price adders.
*Should changes to the drive package (s) specified herein be required due to a system supplier requirement or information not contained in the
specification Rockwell Automation reserves the right to adjust price accordingly.
*All other commercial items to be handled locally
6HFWLRQ 'HVFULSWLRQ
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
W/WW SUBMITTALS
If required, Rockwell Automation standard submittal procedure includes up to 10 submittal binders & 3 CD’s.
Note: The price quoted for submittals is for the printing services only. The engineering required in the preparation of
submittals is included in the base price of the quoted VFD’s. Any submittal not returned within 3 months of submittal
date will be reviewed for price and delivery impact.
W/WW O&M MANUALS
If required, Rockwell Automation standard O & M procedure includes up to 10 submittal binders & 3 CD’s.
SHIPMENT
ƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐĚƌĂǁŝŶŐƐƐƵƉƉůŝĞĚϲͲϴǁĞĞŬƐZK͘Lead time is 14-20 Weeksafter RA receipt ofapproved drawings. This
does not include time required for special/witness testing and/or dyne testing.
FREIGHT
Freight is prepaid and allowed to first destination, with means of transport selected by Rockwell Automation. Special
means of transport directed by customer purchase order will incur additional freight charges. Freight for the VFD to
the pump manufacturer’s facility is also included in the price. Freight cost for shipping VFD’s from the pump OEM’s
facility to the jobsite is NOT included. Rockwell Automation has included in this proposal our standard packaging and
shipping for configured drives. Export crating is not included in this proposal.
WARRANTY
Standard–Parts only-Warranty period is the lesser of 12 months from startup or 18 months from date of shipment from
the Rockwell Automation manufacturing facility unless otherwise noted. See definition below.
Parts and labor warranty is available upon request. See definition below.
Definition –Parts warranty: Covers the major component items of the supplied materials. Expendable items including
but not exclusive of lights/indicators, fuses, push-buttons, fans, filters, relays, are excluded from the provided on-site
warranty offered.
Seller does not warrant and will not be liable for any design, materials, construction criteria or goods furnished or
specified by Buyer (including that sourced from other manufacturers or vendors specified by Buyer). Any warranty
applicable to such Buyer-specified items will be limited solely to the warranty, if any, extended by the original
manufacturer or vendor directly or indirectly to Buyer. Seller does not warrant the compatibility of its Products with the
goods of other manufacturers or Buyer's application except to the extent expressly represented in Seller's published
specifications or written quotation.
Definition –Parts & labor warranty (if included in this proposal): Consist of time, travel and expenses for services
covered under the parts warranty definition above. On-site warranty services are available Monday through Friday
8AM to 5PM, excluding Rockwell Automation and/or National holidays. Requested on-site warranty services require a
minimum of 24 hours advance notification. Warranty services requested outside the normal Monday through Friday
8AM to 5PM working period (evenings and/or holidays) will be billable for labor and expenses at the Rockwell
Automation standard published engineering rate for labor at the time of the request and for expenses at actual cost
plus 10% handling charge.
On-site warranty services and expenses will be billable for warranty calls found to be solely of the expendable items
listed above.
PRICE IS FIRM
Price is valid for 30 days from initial issue of proposal. Delays incurred by others resulting in a shipment date after the
mutually agreed upon shipping date specified in the purchase order may cause escalation of the quoted price.
Pricing does not include any state, sales, use or other taxes as may be applicable to this project.
RIGHT TO INVOICE
Purchaser will be notified when Rockwell Automation is ready to ship. Rockwell Automation reserves the right, upon
stated notification, to issue invoice for goods ready to ship notwithstanding purchaser’s ability to accept shipment.
STORAGE
Provisions must be made by the receiving party for storage in a clean, dry, temperature controlled facility
immediately after conducting a thorough receiving inspection. In the event purchaser is unable to accept
shipment upon notification of Rockwell Automation’s readiness to ship, goods shall be placed in suitable storage by
Rockwell Automation. Storage charges, escalation charges (if applicable) and any charges for drayage, re-
inspection by Q.A., etc. will be accrued to the account of the purchaser.
COMMERCIAL ITEMS&217
'
VFD TESTING
Each VFD goes throughRockwell Automation Standard testing procedures before being shipped. Rockwell
Automation can also customize a test procedure to meet your specific project needs. ExtendedTests are notincluded
unless specifically listed in this proposal. Contact your Rockwell Automation sales office for further detailsand pricing.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE:
If the service is purchased direct from Rockwell Automation, Rockwell Automation Conditions of Sale are applicable.
If service is purchased through an authorized Allen-Bradley Distributor, the distributor’s terms and conditions of sale are
applicable.
PUBLICITY
Customer agrees that Rockwell Automation may disclose in the ordinary course of business Customer’s name andlogo
on Rockwell Automation’s customer list and Web site. For this project, Rockwell Automation may wish topublicize a
contract award by issuing a brief news release, and only on a one-time basis. In such event, RockwellAutomation will
provide Customer with a written request approving such news release. Customer agrees to approveor deny such
requests within 30 days from receipt of request.
TRAINING
If Informal training is included in this proposal, unless otherwise agreed to in advance, this training will be provided on
site by the Rockwell Engineer performing the start-up work. No training manuals will be supplied. No formal classroom
training involving printed materials, overhead projectors, or training demo hardware is included. The training may
referto the O & M manuals supplied for the project, but they are not required for training. Training may not be
recorded.HARMONIC ANALYSIS/TESTING
If harmonic analysis/calculations are included in this proposal, there will be a limit of two iterations of bus and/or
loading configurations.
If on site harmonic measurements are included, it is the customer’s responsibility to verify that all motors are fullyloaded
at the time of verification testing and to arrange for the drives to be shutdown to acquire baseline
Rockwell Automation Commitment for System Sales Through Distribution
General. This Commitment (“Commitment”) covers purchase by Distributor’s customer (“Customer”) from Distributor of the hardware, software,
and/or services (individually a “Product” and collectively “Products”) described and integrated pursuant to this Statement of Work (collectively as
integrated pursuant to the Statement of Work, the “WORK”) to be provided by Rockwell Automation, Inc. and/or its affiliates (“Rockwell
Automation”). Its terms are integral to the Statement or Work. In other words, Customer purchases the Work subject to the terms contained in this
Commitment (as well as other terms that may be included elsewhere in the Statement of Work). These terms apply directly to Customer and
Rockwell Automation. Previously negotiated and signed terms and conditions with Customer that include provisions between Rockwell
Automation and Customer for sale of systems through distribution supersede these terms.
Warranty.(a)Warranty : Rockwell Automation warrants to Customer for the lesser period of 18 months from delivery or 12 months from startup,
that the WORK will perform as stated in the Statement of Work and the Products will be free of defects in material, fabrication, and workmanship
provided that: (1) the operating conditions and use of the WORK are in accordance with any standards set forth in the Statement of Work,
Rockwell Automation's published specifications, and applicable recommendations of Rockwell Automation; and (2) the installation, adjustment,
tuning, and start-up of the WORK have been properly performed in accordance with Rockwell Automation’s published specifications and any
applicable recommendations of Rockwell Automation. Repaired or replacement Products provided pursuant to subparagraph (b) below are
similarly warranted for the longer period of six months from date of shipment or the remainder of the original warranty term.
(b)Remedies : Remedies under this warranty will be limited to, at Rockwell Automation’s discretion, replacement, repair, re-performance,
modification, or issuance of a credit for the purchase price of the Products involved, but only after the return of such Products pursuant to
Rockwell Automation’s instructions. Replacement Products, at Rockwell Automation’s discretion, may be new, remanufactured, refurbished, or
reconditioned. If the repair, re-performance, or replacement does not cure the defective performance, Customer may request emergency on-site
service, which will be at Rockwell Automation’s expense (consisting of time, travel, and expenses incurred by Rockwell Automation related to
such services). If the defective performance is not due to warranted defects in the WORK or Products, the on-site service will be at Customer’s
expense. On-site warranty services performed at Rockwell Automation expense shall not include removal or reinstallation costs related to large-
scale assemblies such as motors or transformers. The foregoing will be the exclusive remedies for any breach of warranty or breach of contract
arising from warranted defects.
(c)General : Warranty satisfaction is available only if (a) Rockwell Automation is provided prompt written notice of the warranty claim, and (b)
Rockwell Automation’s examination discloses that any alleged defect has not been caused by misuse, neglect, improper installation, operation,
maintenance, repair, alteration, or modification by other than Rockwell Automation, accident, or unusual deterioration or degradation of the
Products or parts thereof due to physical environment or electrical or electromagnetic noise environment.
(d)Services : Rockwell Automation warrants that service (including, but not limited to, training, installation, modifications, additions, software
programming, engineering, startup, or repairs) shall be performed in a workmanlike manner conforming to standard industry practice. Rockwell
Automation must receive written notification of non-conforming services within 30 days after the services are provided. If such services are
confirmed to be non-conforming, Rockwell Automation will, at its option, re-perform the service or provide a refund or credit to Customer in the
amount paid for the service. The foregoing will be the exclusive remedies for any breach of warranty or breach of contract arising from warranted
non-conforming services.
(e) THE ABOVE WARRANTIES ARE IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS, WHETHER EXPRESSED, IMPLIED OR
STATUTORY, INCLUDING IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, INFRINGEMENT, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE.
Disclaimer and Limitation of Liability. NEITHER ROCKWELL AUTOMATION NOR CUSTOMER WILL BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER FOR
BUSINESS INTERRUPTION OR LOSS OF PROFIT, REVENUE, MATERIALS, OR THE LIKE (WHETHER DIRECT OR INDIRECT) OR FOR
ANY INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. EACH PARTY’S MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE LIABILITY TO EACH OTHER
FOR ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES WILL NOT EXCEED THE LESSER OF $1,000,000 OR THE COST OF THE WORK. ROCKWELL
AUTOMATION DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FOR TO GRATUITOUS ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY ROCKWELL AUTOMATION BUT NOT
REQUIRED BY THE STATEMENT OF WORK. THESE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY WILL APPLY REGARDLESS THE
FORM OF ACTION, WHETHER CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE, AND EXTEND TO THE BENEFIT OF ROCKWELL AUTOMATION’S
VENDORS AND APPOINTED DISTRIBUTOR.
Intellectual Property. (a) Firmware and Packaged Software. Software comprised of firmware or packaged software is subject to Customer’s
acceptance of additional terms and conditions set forth in separate Rockwell Automation or third-party license agreements. In the absence of a
separate Rockwell Automation license agreement, Rockwell Automation hereby grants Customer a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use
such firmware or packaged software only in object code form and solely in conjunction with the WORK, without the right to sublicense, disclose,
disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer, or otherwise modify the firmware or software. Ownership of the respective Rockwell Automation or
third-party firmware or packaged software shall remain with Rockwell Automation or the third party.
(b) Documentation and Other Software. Rockwell Automation hereby grants to Customer a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to modify and
use solely in conjunction with the WORK all documentation and any software created by Rockwell Automation as specified in the Statement of
Work.
(c) Ownership of Pre-existing Intellectual Property. Each party shall continue to own all right, title, and interest in all patents, trademarks,
copyrights, confidential information, and other intellectual property rights as it owned on the Effective Date of this Commitment.
(d) No Other Licenses. Except as expressly set forth herein, no license under any patents, trademarks, copyrights, confidential information, or
other intellectual property rights is granted or implied under this Commitment by either party.
Government Clauses and Contracts. No government contract clauses, specification, or regulations apply to the WORK, Products, or otherwise
to this Statement of Work except to the extent agreed in writing by Rockwell Automation.
Confidentiality.(a) During the term of this Commitment and for a period of three years thereafter, each party will maintain in strict confidence all
technical and business data and information disclosed by one party to the other that is marked "Confidential” and will not use or reveal such
information without the prior written authorization of the other.
(b) The obligations of confidentiality and non-use will not apply to information (i) that is published or becomes part of the public domain other than
by means of a breach of this Commitment; (ii) that a party can prove by written documentation was known to it prior to disclosure by the other
party; (iii) that a party subsequently rightfully receives from a third party without an obligation of confidentiality; (iv) that a party discloses to a third
party on a non-confidential basis; or (v) that was independently developed by the receiving party.
(c) Each party will take reasonable precautions to instruct its employees and consultants of its obligation under this section. Additionally, each
party shall protect the exchanged information of the other against unauthorized use or disclosure with the same degree of care as it accords its
own proprietary information of a similar type, but not less than reasonable care.
(d) Disclosure of confidential information will not be precluded if it is: (i) in response to a valid order of a court or governmental body of the United
States or any political subdivision thereof; provided, however, that the disclosing party will first have made a reasonable effort to obtain a
protective order requiring that the confidential information be used only for the purpose for which the order was issued; or (ii) otherwise required
by law.
Independent Terms. Rockwell Automation is not a party to or bound by any contract between Customer and Distributor, including by Distributor’s
acceptance of a Customer purchase order. Distributor is an independent enterprise, not an agent or representative of Rockwell Automation, and
is not authorized to bind Rockwell Automation.
Effective Date. This Commitment will become effective when Customer purchases the WORK from Distributor. Customer agrees that by
purchasing the WORK it accepts the Statement of Work and Commitment. Absent such purchase, this Commitment will become null and void. No
addition or modification to the Commitment and Statement of Work, including terms appearing in Customer’s purchase order or requisition, will
bind Rockwell Automation unless mutually agreed to in writing.
Delivery. Ex Works Rockwell Automation’s plant or warehouse (per current Incoterms) or as otherwise specified in the Statement of Work
(Delivery). In all cases, title transfers to Customer upon the earlier of Rockwell Automation’s delivery to Customer or receipt by the first carrier for
transport to Customer, except that title to all intellectual property rights associated with the WORK remains with Rockwell Automation or its
suppliers and licensors.
Acceptance. (a) Acceptance occurs (i) on the date the WORK conforms to acceptance criteria in the Statement of Work or is otherwise
beneficially used by Customer, but in no event later than 120 days following Delivery; or (ii) if otherwise unspecified, upon Delivery.
(b)Interim Approvals . Any Rockwell Automation submittal or deliverable requiring Customer approval pursuant to the Scope of Work will be
deemed accepted if formal Customer approval, written or as otherwise required, is not received by Rockwell Automation within two calendar
weeks after the date submitted.
Changes. Any change resulting from any of the following circumstances is subject to equitable adjustments to price, scheduling, and other
affected terms and conditions: (a) Customer requested changes, including those affecting the identity, scope, and delivery of the WORK or
Products; (b) physical conditions differing materially from those indicated or anticipated in the Statement of Work or that otherwise differ
materially from those ordinarily found under similar circumstances; (c) delays caused by Customer, its employees, affiliates, other contractors to
Customer, or any other party within Customer’s reasonable control; and (d) an emergency endangering persons or property; in such emergency
circumstances, Rockwell Automation may act at its discretion to prevent damage, injury, or loss.
All changes, except actions necessitated by emergencies as provided in (d) above, must be executed by a written change order signed or
otherwise definitively authorized by both parties, and Rockwell Automation will not begin work on a change until it is authorized. All claims must
be made within a reasonable time after the occurrence giving rise to the claim.
Safety and Standards. Rockwell Automation is responsible for compliance of the WORK with laws, regulations, and standards, including safety
regulations and standards, of the country where the WORK will be located that are applicable to the WORK at the effective date of this
Agreement. Customer must inform Rockwell Automation of any other laws, regulations, or standards that may apply to the WORK. Rockwell
Automation will be responsible for compliance with such other safety or other standards only if documented in the Statement of Work. Rockwell
Automation is not responsible for laws, regulations, or standards that apply to Customer’s (or end user’s, if different from Customer) facility,
equipment, process, information system, or data.
Site Rules, Licenses, Permits, Site Preparation. (a) Rockwell Automation agrees to comply with all applicable posted site rules of Customer
(unless inconsistent with the obligations set forth in the Statement of Work) and any additional Customer’s site rules that have been incorporated
into the Statement of Work.
(b) Customer is responsible for: (1) all licenses, permits, clearances, and site access rights; (2) all sites being ready and equipped with all
necessary Customer furnished equipment and facilities; (3) any required customer fixtures or facilities being hazard free, structurally sound, and
sufficient; and (4) reasonable access to the worksite as required for installing, commissioning or using the WORK.
Customer Specification. Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work, Rockwell Automation will not be liable for (i) design, materials, or
construction criteria furnished or specified by Customer and incorporated into the WORK or Products, (ii) products made by or sourced from other
manufacturers or vendors specified by Customer; or (iii) commercially available computer software, hardware, and electrical components. (Such
Customer-specified products shall include but not be limited to any identified in the Statement of Work.)
Customer Information. Customer warrants that access and use of information made available by Customer to Rockwell Automation, including
technical specifications, drawings, source code, application code, communication interfaces, protocols, and other documentation, will not infringe
or violate any intellectual property rights of the original vendor or other third party.
RoHS. 1. Customer-Furnished Equipment (CFE) will meet all applicable material restrictions as defined in RoHS. If it does not, customer will
notify Rockwell Automation prior to shipment of the CFE to Rockwell Automation. Customer will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Rockwell
Automation, its distributors, representatives, agents and employees from and against all claims, damage, losses and expenses, including attorney
fees, associated with any requirements or regulations requiring these material restrictions for products or solutions.
2. The EU RoHS regulation takes effect July 22, 2017. Prior to this date, [Distributor] reserves the right to submit a change order proposal to
customer for any requirements for RoHS-compliant products or solutions imposed on [Distributor] or Rockwell Automation from customer or any
third parties empowered to do so.
^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ͗ϰϯϮϯϱϮ͘ϭϯ͗/ŵŵĞƌƐŝďůĞtĞƚͲWŝƚsĂƌŝĂďůĞ^ƉĞĞĚ^ĐƌĞǁĞŶƚƌŝĨƵŐĂůWƵŵƉƐ
ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚdĂŐEƵŵďĞƌƐ͗ ^/W^ϭWDWϬϬϬϭ͕^/W^ϭWDWϬϬϬϲ
tĞĂƌĞƉůĞĂƐĞĚƚŽƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƚŚĞW^KƐĐŽƉĞůĞƚƚĞƌƚŚĂƚĚĞƚĂŝůƐƚŚĞ,ŝĚƌŽƐƚĂůϱϭ,ŽƌƐĞƉŽǁĞƌ
^ƵďŵĞƌƐŝďůĞWƵŵƉƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨDĞƌŝĚŝĂŶ/W^WƌŽũĞĐƚ͘
W^KůŽŽŬƐĨŽƌǁĂƌĚƚŽǁŽƌŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚLJŽƵŽŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘^ŚŽƵůĚLJŽƵŚĂǀĞĂŶLJĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐŽƌ
ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƚŚŝƐƐĐŽƉĞ͕ƉůĞĂƐĞĨĞĞůĨƌĞĞƚŽĐŽŶƚĂĐƚ:ŽĞ<ĞƌŶŬĂŵƉĂƚŽƵƌŽĨĨŝĐĞĂƚ
;ϰϮϱͿϴϮϮͲϯϯϯϱ͘
Yh/WD Ed/E>h ͗
Ydz;ϮͿWhDWDŽĚĞů&ϭϬ<ͲD
Ydz;ϮͿWƌĞƌŽƐƚĂů^ŝnjĞϭϯϬϬĂƐŝŶƐ
Ydz;ϮͿWƌĞƌŽƐƚĂů&ĂƐƚͲKƵƚ^ŝnjĞϭϬyϭϬ;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƐƉŽŽůƉŝĞĐĞƐͿ
Ydz;ϮͿWƌĞƌŽƐƚĂů^ƵĐƚŝŽŶĞůůŵŽƵƚŚ;^^͕ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƐƉŽŽůƉŝĞĐĞƐͿ
Ydz;ϮͿ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ>ŝĨƚƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚŚĂŝŶϮWŽŝŶƚƐƐĞŵďůLJ;ůŝĨƚŝŶŐďĂůĞƐŝnjĞĚĨŽƌůĂƌŐĞƌƉƵŵƉƐ
ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚͿ
Ydz;ϮͿϯϬ&ĞĞƚ^^ŚĂŝŶ;ϯͬϴΗŚĂŝŶϮΖ͕ϭͬϮΗ^ŚĂĐŬůĞƐ͕ŚĂŝŶƐŝnjĞĚĨŽƌůĂƌŐĞƉƵŵƉƐ, includes grip eyeͿ
Ydz;ϮͿ/ŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞ'ƵŝĚĞZĂŝůƌĂĐŬĞƚ;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐůĂŵƉĂŶĚƚŚƌĞĂĚĞĚƌŽĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐ
ĞĂĐŚŝŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞŐƵŝĚĞƌĂŝůďƌĂĐŬĞƚƚŽƚŚĞƉƵŵƉĚŝƐĐŚĂƌŐĞƉŝƉĞͿ
Ydz;ϮͿhƉƉĞƌŐƵŝĚĞƌĂŝůďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐ
Ydz;ϮͿϱϭ,W;ϰϰ͘ϯ,Wϭ͘ϭϱ^&Ϳ͕ϭϳϲϬZWD͕ϰϲϬs͕/ŵŵĞƌƐŝďůĞDŽƚŽƌ
Ydz;ϮͿϵϴ&ĞĞƚĂďůĞ;/ŶĐůƵĚĞƐϭƉŽǁĞƌĐĂďůĞ͕ϮĐŽŶƚƌŽůĐĂďůĞƐĞĂ͘Ϳ
Ydz;ϮͿtĂƌƌŝĐŬ^ĞƌŝĞƐϭϳDŽŝƐƚƵƌĞZĞůĂLJ
Ydz;ϮͿ^ŝĞŵĞŶƐdŚĞƌŵŝƐƚŽƌZĞůĂLJ
Ydz;ϮͿƵƐƚŽŵĞƌtŝƚŶĞƐƐĞĚWĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞdĞƐƚ
Ydz;ϮͿ,LJĚƌŽƐƚĂƚŝĐĂŶĚEW^,dĞƐƚ
Ydz;1ͿϮ͘ϱΗŝĂŵĞƚĞƌϯϭϲ^ƚĂŝŶůĞƐƐ^ƚĞĞů^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞϰϬWŝƉĞĨŽƌŐƵŝĚĞƌĂŝůƐ to be used for all F10K-MD
pumps
Dd Z/>^K&KE^dZhd/KE͗
WƵŵƉdLJƉĞ͗/DD Z^/> ͬ^hD Z^/> WhDW
WƵŵƉ^ŝnjĞ͗&ϭϬ<
WƵŵƉ/ŵƉĞůůĞƌ͗&ϭϬ<ͲD
tĞƚ ŶĚdLJƉĞ͗Z 'h>>
^ƚĂŝŶůĞƐƐ^ƚĞĞů͗z ^Ͳ^^/DW >> Z
tĞƚ ŶĚDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗,/Ͳ,ZKD KE^dZhd/KE
sŽůƵƚĞĂƐŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗^d/ZKEϰϱ>ϯϬ
/ŵƉĞůůĞƌDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗^d/E> ^^^d >ϳϰϯ&ϴD
>ŝŶĞƌDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗,/Ͳ,ZKD ϱϯϮͲ///Ͳ
^ƵĐƚŝŽŶĂƐŝŶŐͬŽǀĞƌDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗^d/ZKEϰϱ>ϯϬ
tĞĂƌZŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗,/Ͳ,ZKD ϱϯϮͲ///Ͳ
/ŵƉĞůůĞƌ&ůĂŶŐĞDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗hd/> /ZKEϱϯϲͲϴϬͲϱϱͲϬϲ
DŽƚŽƌ͗/DD Z^/> DKdKZ͕ϱϭ,WϭϳϲϬZWD͕^dEZK/>KK>/E'͕ϵϴ& d
> ͕&D͕ϰϲϬs͕& ϰdϰͲDz<нyϭϲDDͲϮϱ;ϰϰ͘ϯ,Wϭ͘ϭϱ^&Ϳ
^ŚĂĨƚDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗^d/E> ^^^d >/^/ϰϮϬ
^ĞĂůŝŶŐ dLJƉĞ͗ WhDW ^/ ͗ dzW D͕ Zh Z KKd ^/E'> ^WZ/E' ^ >͕ ^ͬd ^ĞĂůŝŶŐ dLJƉĞ͗
DKdKZ ^/ ͗ dzW &͕ Zh Z >>Kt^ ^/E'> ^WZ/E' ^ >͕ ^ͬ ŽĂƚŝŶŐ͗ dE D Eϲϵ
^dEZdtKWZdW/Ed
Pump Data Sheet - Hidrostal US
Company:
Name:
Date: 3/13/2017
Pump:
Size: F10K-MD
Type: HIDROSTAL Speed: 1759 rpmSynch Speed: Adjustable Dia: 12.75 in
Curve: CUR-F10K-MD Impeller: F10K-MD
Specific Speeds:Ns: ---Nss: ---
Dimensions:Suction: 10 inDischarge: 10 in
Pump Limits:
Temperature: ---Power: ---Pressure: ---Eye Area: ---Sphere Size: 4.5 in
Search Criteria:
Flow: 2986 US gpm Head: 43 ft
Fluid:
Water Temperature: 60 °FDensity: 62.37 lb/ft³Vapor Pressure: 0.2563 psi aViscosity: 1.105 cP Atm Pressure: 14.7 psi a
NPSHa: ---
Motor:
---Speed: ---Frame: ---
Standard: ---Enclosure: ---
Sizing Criteria: Max Power on Design Curve
Selected from catalog: Hidrostal US.60 Vers: 1.2
---- Duty Point ----
Flow:2987 US gpm
Head:43 ft
Eff:76%
Power:42.4 hp
NPSHr:13.3 ft
---- Design Curve ----
Shutoff Head:117 ft
Shutoff dP:50.8 psi
Min Flow:1065 US gpm
BEP: 78.9% @ 2536 US gpm
NOL Power:
53.7 hp @ 1074 US gpm
-- Max Curve --
Max Power:
57.3 hp @ 1096 US gpm
US gpm
NP
S
H
r
-
f
t
40003500300025002000150010000500
10
20
30
He
a
d
-
f
t
400035000
10
3000
20
2500
30
40
2000
50
60
1500
70
1000
80
90
500
100
78.9
1759 rpm
1800 rpm
1650 rpm
1550 rpm
1450 rpm
1350 rpm
1250 rpm
1150 rpm
1050 rpm
950 rpm
850 rpm
5 hp 7.5 hp10 hp 15 hp
20 hp25 hp30 hp
40 hp
50 hp
60 hp
55
55
60
60
60
60
65
65
65
65
70
70
70
70
75
75
75
75
78
78
Performance Evaluation:
Flow Speed Head Efficiency Power NPSHrUS gpm rpm ft %hp ft
3583 1759 27.6 62 39.9 17.7
2986 1759 43.1 76 42.4 13.3
2389 1759 61.4 78 47 10.4
1792 1759 78.8 72 49.7 8.13
1194 1759 95 54 53.2 6.91
^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ͗
ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚdĂŐEƵŵďĞƌƐ͗ ^/W^ϭWDWϬϬϬϮ͕^/W^ϭWDWϬϬϬϯ͕^/W^ϭWDWϬϬϬϰ͕^/W^ϭWDWϬϬϬϱ
tĞĂƌĞƉůĞĂƐĞĚƚŽƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƚŚĞW^KƐĐŽƉĞůĞƚƚĞƌƚŚĂƚĚĞƚĂŝůƐƚŚĞ,ŝĚƌŽƐƚĂůϭϬϳ,ŽƌƐĞƉŽǁĞƌ^ƵďŵĞƌƐŝďůĞ
WƵŵƉƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨDĞƌŝĚŝĂŶ/W^WƌŽũĞĐƚ͘
W^KůŽŽŬƐĨŽƌǁĂƌĚƚŽǁŽƌŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚLJŽƵŽŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘^ŚŽƵůĚLJŽƵŚĂǀĞĂŶLJĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐŽƌĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐ
ƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƚŚŝƐƐĐŽƉĞ͕ƉůĞĂƐĞĨĞĞůĨƌĞĞƚŽĐŽŶƚĂĐƚ:ŽĞ<ĞƌŶŬĂŵƉĂƚŽƵƌŽĨĨŝĐĞĂƚ;ϰϮϱͿϴϮϮͲϯϯϯϱ͘
Yh/WD Ed/E>h ͗
Ydz;ϰͿWhDWDŽĚĞů,ϭϮ<Ͳ^^
Ydz;ϰͿWƌĞƌŽƐƚĂů^ŝnjĞϭϯϬϬĂƐŝŶƐ
Ydz;ϰͿWƌĞƌŽƐƚĂů&ĂƐƚͲKƵƚ^ŝnjĞϭϮyϭϮ;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƐƉŽŽůƉŝĞĐĞƐͿ
Ydz;ϰͿWƌĞƌŽƐƚĂů^ƵĐƚŝŽŶĞůůŵŽƵƚŚ;^^͕ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƐƉŽŽůƉŝĞĐĞƐͿ
Ydz;ϰͿ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ>ŝĨƚƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚŚĂŝŶϮWŽŝŶƚƐƐĞŵďůLJ;ůŝĨƚŝŶŐďĂůĞƐŝnjĞĚĨŽƌůĂƌŐĞƌƉƵŵƉƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚͿ
Ydz;ϰͿϯϬ&ĞĞƚ^^ŚĂŝŶ;ϯͬϴΗŚĂŝŶϮΖ͕ϭͬϮΗ^ŚĂĐŬůĞƐ͕ĐŚĂŝŶƐŝnjĞĚĨŽƌůĂƌŐĞƉƵŵƉƐ, includes grip eyeͿ
Ydz;ϰͿ/ŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞ'ƵŝĚĞZĂŝůƌĂĐŬĞƚ;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐůĂŵƉĂŶĚƚŚƌĞĂĚĞĚƌŽĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐĞĂĐŚ
ŝŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞŐƵŝĚĞƌĂŝůďƌĂĐŬĞƚƚŽƚŚĞƉƵŵƉĚŝƐĐŚĂƌŐĞƉŝƉĞͿ
Ydz;ϰͿhƉƉĞƌŐƵŝĚĞƌĂŝůďƌĂĐŬĞƚ
Ydz;ϰͿϭϬϳ,W;ϵϯ,Wϭ͘ϭϱ^&Ϳ͕ϭ180ZWD͕ϰϲϬs͕/ŵŵĞƌƐŝďůĞDŽƚŽƌ
Ydz;ϰͿϵϴ&ĞĞƚĂďůĞ;/ŶĐůƵĚĞƐϭƉŽǁĞƌĐĂďůĞ͕ϮĐŽŶƚƌŽůĐĂďůĞƐĞĂ͘Ϳ
Ydz;ϭϮͿtĂƌƌŝĐŬ^ĞƌŝĞƐϭϳDŽŝƐƚƵƌĞZĞůĂLJ
Ydz;ϰͿ^ŝĞŵĞŶƐdŚĞƌŵŝƐƚŽƌZĞůĂLJ
Ydz;ϰͿƵƐƚŽŵĞƌtŝƚŶĞƐƐĞĚWĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞdĞƐƚ
Ydz;ϰͿ,LJĚƌŽƐƚĂƚŝĐĂŶĚEW^,dĞƐƚ
Ydz;1ͿϮ͘ϱΗŝĂŵƚĞƌϯϭϲ^ƚĂŝŶůĞƐƐ^ƚĞĞů^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞϰϬWŝƉĞĨŽƌŐƵŝĚĞƌĂŝůƐ to be used for all H12K-SS pumps
NOTE: Lower bearing temperature protection is included for all H12K-SS pumps supplied.
Dd Z/>^K&KE^dZhd/KE͗
WƵŵƉdLJƉĞ͗/DD Z^/> ͬ^hD Z^/> WhDW
WƵŵƉ^ŝnjĞ͗,ϭϮ<
WƵŵƉ/ŵƉĞůůĞƌ͗,ϭϮ<Ͳ^^
tĞƚ ŶĚdLJƉĞ͗Z 'h>>
tĞƚ ŶĚDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗,/Ͳ,ZKD KE^dZhd/KE
sŽůƵƚĞĂƐŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗^d/ZKEϰϱ>ϯϬ
/ŵƉĞůůĞƌDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗^d/E> ^^^d >ϳϰϯ&ϴD
>ŝŶĞƌDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗,/Ͳ,ZKD ϱϯϮͲ///Ͳ
^ƵĐƚŝŽŶĂƐŝŶŐͬŽǀĞƌDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗^d/ZKEϰϱ>ϯϬ
tĞĂƌZŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗,/Ͳ,ZKD ϱϯϮͲ///Ͳ
/ŵƉĞůůĞƌ&ůĂŶŐĞDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗hd/> /ZKEϱϯϲͲϴϬͲϱϱͲϬϲ
DŽƚŽƌ͗/DD Z^/> DKdKZ͕ϭϬϳ,WϭϭϴϬZWD͕^dEZK/>KK>/E'͕ϵϴ& d
> ͕&D͕ϰϲϬs͕, hϲͲyz<нy ϭϵDDͲϮϱ;ϵϯ,Wϭ͘ϭϱ^&Ϳ
^ŚĂĨƚDĂƚĞƌŝĂů͗^d/E> ^^^d >/^/ϰϮϬ
^ĞĂůŝŶŐdLJƉĞ͗WhDW^/ ͗dzW y͕^d/E> ^^^d >,Kh^ Dh>d/^WZ/E'^ >͕^ͬd
^ĞĂůŝŶŐdLJƉĞ͗DKdKZ^/ ͗dzW &͕Zh Z >>Kt^^/E'> ^WZ/E'^ >͕^ͬ
ŽĂƚŝŶŐ͗dE D Eϲϵ^dEZdtKWZdW/Ed
ϰϯϮϯϱϮ͘ϭϯ͗/ŵŵĞƌƐŝďůĞtĞƚͲWŝƚsĂƌŝĂďůĞ^ƉĞĞĚ^ĐƌĞǁĞŶƚƌŝĨƵŐĂůWƵŵƉƐ
Pump Data Sheet - Hidrostal US
Company:
Name:
Date: 3/13/2017
Pump:
Size: H12K-SS
Type: HIDROSTAL Speed: 1183 rpmSynch Speed: Adjustable Dia: 17.375 in
Curve: CUR-H12K-SS Impeller: H12K-SS
Specific Speeds:Ns: ---Nss: ---
Dimensions:Suction: 12 inDischarge: 12 in
Pump Limits:
Temperature: ---Power: ---Pressure: ---Eye Area: ---Sphere Size: 5.88 in
Search Criteria:
Flow: 6042 US gpm Head: 43 ft
Fluid:
Water Temperature: 60 °FDensity: 62.37 lb/ft³Vapor Pressure: 0.2563 psi aViscosity: 1.105 cP Atm Pressure: 14.7 psi a
NPSHa: ---
Motor:
---Speed: ---Frame: ---
Standard: ---Enclosure: ---
Sizing Criteria: Max Power on Design Curve
Selected from catalog: Hidrostal US.60 Vers: 1.2
---- Duty Point ----
Flow:6044 US gpm
Head:43 ft
Eff:78%
Power:84 hp
NPSHr:18.7 ft
---- Design Curve ----
Shutoff Head:128 ft
Shutoff dP:55.4 psi
Min Flow:2076 US gpm
BEP: 78.2% @ 5612 US gpm
NOL Power:
101 hp @ 2171 US gpm
-- Max Curve --
Max Power:
217 hp @ 2752 US gpm
US gpm x10
NP
S
H
r
-
f
t
110010009008007006005004003002000100
20
40
He
a
d
-
f
t
110010000900800
20
700
40
600
60
500
80
400
100
300
120
200
140
100
78.2
1183 rpm
1500 rpm
1460 rpm
1350 rpm
1250 rpm
1150 rpm
1050 rpm
960 rpm
850 rpm
750 rpm
650 rpm
7.5 hp10 hp 15 hp 20 hp25 hp30 hp40 hp50 hp60 hp 75 hp 100 hp125 hp
150 hp
200 hp
250 hp
55
55
60
60
65
65
65
65
70
70
70
70
73
73
73
73
76
76
78
78
Performance Evaluation:
Flow Speed Head Efficiency Power NPSHrUS gpm rpm ft %hp ft
7250 1183 30.7 72 77.6 19.9
6042 1183 43 78 84 18.7
4834 1183 55.3 77 87.3 18.3
3625 1183 68.1 71 88.1 18.5
2417 1183 84.3 55 94 18.6
^ Zs/ ^EKd, Z/d D^/E>h
v ŽŵƉůĞƚĞƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂůƉĂĐŬĂŐĞ͘
v d ^d/E'
v ^ƚĂƌƚƵƉ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
v KƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚDĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŵĂŶƵĂůƐ͘
v Ydz;ϭͿ^ĞƚŽĨ^ĞŝƐŵŝĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ŶLJĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŽƌŵŽĚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝůůďĞďŝůůĞĚ
ĂƚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĐŽƐƚ͘
^, h>
^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮϲϮϵϮϯ͗>ŽǁͲsŽůƚĂŐĞĚũƵƐƚĂďůĞ&ƌĞƋƵĞŶĐLJƌŝǀĞƐ
v ƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĚƌĂǁŝŶŐƐƐƵƉƉůŝĞĚϴǁĞĞŬƐZK
v >ĞĂĚƚŝŵĞŝƐϮϬǁĞĞŬƐĂĨƚĞƌZƌĞĐĞŝƉƚŽĨĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĚƌĂǁŝŶŐƐ͘;dŚŝƐ
ƚŝŵĞĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŝŵĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌƐƉĞĐŝĂůͬǁŝƚŶĞƐƐƚĞƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚͬŽƌ
ĚLJŶĞƚĞƐƚŝŶŐͿ
v ϲǁĞĞŬƐĨŽƌƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂůƐ
^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϰϯϮϯϱϮ͘ϭϯ͗/ŵŵĞƌƐŝďůĞtĞƚͲWŝƚsĂƌŝĂďůĞ^ƉĞĞĚ^ĐƌĞǁĞŶƚƌŝĨƵŐĂů
WƵŵƉƐĂŶĚ/ŶƚĂŬĞĂƐŝŶƐ
v ϮϰǁĞĞŬƐZK
v ϲǁĞĞŬƐĨŽƌƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂůƐ
EKd ^E y Wd/KE^
^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮϲϮϵϮϯ͗>ŽǁͲsŽůƚĂŐĞĚũƵƐƚĂďůĞ&ƌĞƋƵĞŶĐLJƌŝǀĞƐ
ϭ͘ϬϮ ^KhZ Yh>/dzKEdZK>
džĐĞƉƚŝŽŶ͗ZƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐĂŶĚWƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐĂƉƉůLJ͘EŽŽƚŚĞƌ
ĐƵƐƚŽŵƚĞƐƚŝŶŐǁŝůůďĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƐĐŽƉĞ͘
ϭ͘Ϭϯ ^hD/dd>^
ůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗Z^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ^ƵďŵŝƚƚĂůƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƌŝǀĞƐǁŝůůďĞƐƵƉƉůŝĞĚ
ǁŝůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ͕ƐŽŵĞŝƚĞŵƐƵŶĚĞƌƚŚŝƐĐĂƚĞŐŽƌLJŝƐďLJƚŚĞĐŽŶƚĂĐƚŽƌ͘
ϭ͘Ϭϰ KKZ/Ed/KE͗
džĐĞƉƚŝŽŶ͗EŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƐĐŽƉĞ͘LJŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘
Ϯ͘ϬϮ^z^d D
'͘ϭ͘ůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗WĂŶĞůĐŽůŽƌĂŶĚĐŚĞŵŝƐƚƌLJĂƌĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ
ƉĂŶĞůŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌĞƌ͘
ϯ͘Ϭϭ /E^d>>d/KE
džĐĞƉƚŝŽŶ͗EŽ/ŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƐĐŽƉĞ͕ďLJŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘
ϯ͘ϬϮ DEh&dhZ ZΖ^^ Zs/ ^
džĐĞƉƚŝŽŶ͗Z^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ^ƚĂƌƚͲhƉΘdƌĂŝŶŝŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶ
ƐĐŽƉĞ͘ŶLJŽƚŚĞƌƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚǁŝůůŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞƋƵŽƚĞĚůŽĐĂůůLJ͘
' E Z>
,ĂƌŵŽŶŝĐͲůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ZŽĐŬǁĞůůƐƵƉƉůŝĞĚŝŶƉƵƚϱйƌĞĂĐƚŽƌƉĞƌ
ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĂŶĚŽŶĞͲůŝŶĞ͕ZŽĐŬǁĞůůĐĂŶŶŽƚŐƵĂƌĂŶƚĞĞƚŚĞĚƌŝǀĞƐǁŝůůŵĞĞƚ
/ Ͳϱϭϵ͘
ůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ƐƐƵŵĞƚŚĂƚŽƵƚƉƵƚĨŝůƚĞƌŝƐĂůůƚŚĂƚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌ>ĞĂĚ
ůĞŶŐƚŚĨƌŽŵĚƌŝǀĞƚŽŵŽƚŽƌ͘
^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϰϯϮϯϱϮ͘ϭϯ͗/ŵŵĞƌƐŝďůĞtĞƚͲWŝƚsĂƌŝĂďůĞ^ƉĞĞĚ^ĐƌĞǁĞŶƚƌŝĨƵŐĂůWƵŵƉƐĂŶĚ
/ŶƚĂŬĞĂƐŝŶƐ
WĂƌƚϭ' E Z>
Ϯ͘Ϭϲ& dhZ ^
͘ϮΘϯĂ͘Θď͘DĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů^ĞĂůƐ
^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ,ŝĚƌŽƐƚĂůDĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů^ĞĂůƐƚŽďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƉĞƌŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐŽĨ
ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘
&͘WƵŵƉŶĐŚŽƌĂŐĞ͕'ƵŝĚĞZĂŝů^LJƐƚĞŵ͕ĂŶĚĐĐĞƐƐŽƌŝĞƐ
ϯ͘ Ě͘ŶĐŚŽƌďŽůƚƐƚŽďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJŽƚŚĞƌƐ
ϭ͘DŽƚŽƌ&>ŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽƉƌŽƉĞƌůLJƐŝnjĞƚŚĞĚƌŝǀĞƐ͘/Ĩ&>ŝƐŶŽƚĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ
ĂƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĂů͕s&ΖƐĂƌĞƐŝnjĞĚďĂƐĞĚŽŶ,WƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚƵƐŝŶŐE
ϮϬϭϰ͘
Ϯ͘>ŽĐĂůĐŽĚĞŝƐŶŽƚŝŶƚŚĞƐĐŽƉĞŽĨƚŚĞs&ƐƵƉƉůŝĞƌ
ϯ͘dŚĞĚƌŝǀĞƐŚĂǀĞĂĚũƵƐƚĂďůĞĐĂƌƌŝĞƌĨƌĞƋƵĞŶĐLJŽĨϮͲϭϬ<,nj͘dŚĞĚƌŝǀĞƌĂƚŝŶŐƐĂƌĞ
ďĂƐĞĚŽŶϰ<,njƐĞƚƚŝŶŐ͘
ϰ͘ZŽĐŬǁĞůůƵƚŽŵĂƚŝŽŶƉĂĐŬĂŐĞĚĚƌŝǀĞƐĂƌĞƌĂƚĞĚĨŽƌϭϬϬϬŵĂƚϬͲϰϬĚĞŐ͘
ϱ͘>ĂďŽƌ͕ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶĂƌĞŶŽƚŝŶƚŚĞƐĐŽƉĞ
ŽĨƚŚĞs&ƐƵƉƉůŝĞƌ͘
ϲ͘WŽǁĞƌĂŶĚŵŽƚŽƌĐĂďůĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶůƵŐƐĂƌĞƚŚĞƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞ
ƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞƌ͕ŶŽƚZŽĐŬǁĞůůƵƚŽŵĂƚŝŽŶ͘
/d/KE> ^/'EEWW>/d/KE>Z/&/d/KE^
ϳ͘tŝƌĞŵĂƌŬĞƌƐ͕ŝĨƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚďLJƐƉĞĐ͕ĂƌĞƐůĞĞǀĞͲƚLJƉĞĂŶĚĂƉƉůŝĞĚƚŽ
ĐƵƐƚŽŵĞƌǁŝƌŝŶŐƉŽŝŶƚƐŽŶůLJ͘
ϴ͘ZŽĐŬǁĞůůƵƚŽŵĂƚŝŽŶs&WϴĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶƐĂƌĞŶŽƚĂůůŐŽůĚƉůĂƚĞĚ͘
ϵ͘ƌŝǀĞŵŽĚƵůĞƐĂƌĞƌƵŶͲŝŶƚĞƐƚĞĚƉƌŝŽƌƚŽƐŚŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽZŽĐŬǁĞůů
ƵƚŽŵĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƌƵŶͲŝŶŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ͘
ϭϬ͘dŚĞĚŽŽƌŵŽƵŶƚĞĚ,D/ŝƐŶŽƚĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞǁŝƚŚĂŬĞLJƉĂĚŬĞLJƐǁŝƚĐŚ͘
ϭϭ͘DŽƚŽƌĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĐĂďůĞůĞĂĚůĞŶŐƚŚĂŶĚƚLJƉĞĂƌĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞŝĨsͬd
ĨŝůƚĞƌƐĂƌĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘/ĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŝƐƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚƉŽƐƚƉƌŽƉŽƐĂů͘
ϭϮ͘ZŽĐŬǁĞůůƵƚŽŵĂƚŝŽŶs&WŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶƐĂƌĞŶŽƚĂůůŐŽůĚƉůĂƚĞĚ͘
ϭϯ͘ƌŝǀĞŵŽĚƵůĞƐĂƌĞƌƵŶͲŝŶƚĞƐƚĞĚƉƌŝŽƌƚŽƐŚŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽZŽĐŬǁĞůůƵƚŽŵĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŶŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů
ƌƵŶͲŝŶŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ͘
ϭϰ͘dŚĞĚŽŽƌŵŽƵŶƚĞĚ,D/ŝƐŶŽƚĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞǁŝƚŚĂŬĞLJƉĂĚŬĞLJƐǁŝƚĐŚ͘
ϭϱ͘EŽŶͲĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĐĂƌƌLJŝŶŐƉĂƌƚƐǁŝůůďĞƉĂŝŶƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂZŽĐŬǁĞůůƵƚŽŵĂƚŝŽŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƉĂŝŶƚ
ĐŽůŽƌ͘
ϭϲ͘&ŝĞůĚƚĞƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚƚŚĞĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽƉĞƌĨŽƌŵƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŝĞůĚƚĞƐƚŝŶŐŝƐŶŽƚŝŶƚŚĞƐĐŽƉĞŽĨ
ƚŚĞs&ŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌĞƌ͘
ϭϳ͘dŚĞ,D/ďĂĐŬůŝŐŚƚĂŶĚďƵƐƉĂƌĂŵĞƚĞƌĐĂŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚƚŚĞďƵƐŝƐ
ĐŚĂƌŐĞĚ͘
ϭϴ͘tŚĞŶƐŝnjŝŶŐĚƌŝǀĞͬŵŽƚŽƌĐŽŵďŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ZŽĐŬǁĞůůƵƚŽŵĂƚŝŽŶĂƐƐƵŵĞƐƚŚĂƚŝŶǀĞƌƚĞƌĚƵƚLJ
ŵŽƚŽƌƐŚĂǀĞĂƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĨĂĐƚŽƌŽĨϭ͘ϬǁŚĞŶƌƵŶŽŶs&ƉŽǁĞƌ͘
ϭϵ͘ŶLJĐƵƐƚŽŵĞƌƐƵƉƉůŝĞĚĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƐŚŝƉƉĞĚƚŽĂZĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJǁŝůůďĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽĂŵŽƵŶƚŝŶŐ
ĂŶĚŚĂŶĚůŝŶŐĨĞĞ͘
ϮϬ͘ZĞƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŽŶŽĨ,ĂnjĂƌĚŽƵƐ^ƵďƐƚĂŶĐĞƐ;ZŽ,^Ϳ
ΎhŶůĞƐƐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůLJŵĞŶƚŝŽŶĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůĨŽƌŝŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ
ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕W^KŚĂƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂŶLJŽƚŚĞƌŝƚĞŵƐŽƌƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘
Ύ^ĞĞĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƚĞƌŵƐ͕ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƐĂůĞ͕ĂŶĚǁĂƌƌĂŶƚLJ
ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚďĞůŽǁ
dŽƚĂů^ĂůĞWƌŝĐĞĨŽƌĂůůŽĨƚŚĞĂďŽǀĞƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘͘Ψͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ1,165,737.00ͺͺͺͺͺ
1.SCOPE:
acceptance
uponPurch
Sellersellsi
provisions.
2. PRICES:
federal,sta
maybeadd
3. TERMS:
andpayable
notification
Creditterm
whichshall
Latepayme
permonth
whichever
regardlesso
anditscusto
IfPurchaser
anymonies
possession;
immediately
paymentsa
paymentfo
4. ITEMS
equipment
Sellershall
describedin
shallcomp
Occupationa
andSellerh
manufactur
5. SECURIT
applicablel
rightofrepo
infull.Purc
encumber,
Intheev
Purchaser’s
entitledto
attorney’s
GEN
Unlessotherw
ofPurchaser’s
haseraccepting
itsequipmentin
PricesareEXW
teorlocalsales
edtotheprice.
Unlessotherwis
einfull,netͲ30
ofreadiness
saresubjectto
bedetermineds
ntsshallbechar
orthehighe
isless.Purcha
ofanypaymen
omer.
risindefaultof
sofPurchasera
declareallp
ydueandpaya
arebroughtcu
rfutureshipme
INCLUDED:E
describedinthe
supplyonly
ntheorderorin
plywiththose
alHealthandSa
haveidentifieda
reofthegoods.
TYINTEREST:T
law,Sellerreta
ossession,tothe
chaserwillnote
thegoodsbyan
entlegalacti
obligationsun
orecoverits
feesifitprev
NERALT
iseagreedin
purchaseorde
gtheseterms
naccordancewi
W. Pricesdon
s,useorother
seagreed,allin
daysfromdate
toship,which
oPurchaser’scre
solelybySeller.
rgedinterestat
strateallowa
asershallpayt
tschedulebetw
fanypaymentS
availabletoSell
aymentsforco
able;stopallfur
rrent,and/orr
nts.
achsaleinclu
eorder.
thosesafetyd
nitsproposalan
eprovisionso
afetyActof1970
asspecificallya
.
ot h eextenta
insasecurity
egoodsuntilPu
encumber,norp
nyliensorsecur
onisnecessa
nderanyorder,
courtcostsa
ails.Purchase
Page1
TERMSa
writing,Seller’s
risconditioned
andconditions
ththefollowing
notincludeany
taxesandtaxes
nvoicesaredue
eofshipmentor
heverisearlier
editworthiness,
therateof1.5%
bleunderlaw,
hefullamount,
weenPurchaser
Sellermayoffset
erorinSeller’s
ompletedwork
rtherworkunti
requireadvance
udesonlythe
devices,ifany,
ddrawings,and
ofthefedera
0thatPurchaser
pplicabletothe
allowableunder
interestin,and
rchaserhaspaid
permitothersto
rityinstruments
arytoenforce
Sellershallbe
andreasonable
ershallprovide
1of3
ndCON
s
d
.
g
y
s
e
r
.
,
%
,
,
r
t
s
k
l
e
e
,
d
l
r
e
r
d
d
o
.
e
e
e
e
insura
again
6. SH
Seller
itsre
drawi
effort
any
guara
nolia
whet
delive
Unles
factor
claim
shipm
specif
notify
ofrec
shall
Unles
partia
unde
7. WA
withi
isinco
8. PA
Seller
costs
byrea
paten
ifthe
Purch
Seller
9. SU
suspe
Seller
thes
reaso
storag
borne
DITIONS
anceforSeller’
nstlossordamag
HIPMENTSAND
rallnecessaryin
equesteddelive
ingapprovals,
tstomeetthes
suchdatesar
anteednorater
abilitytoPurcha
herdirectorin
ery,regardlesso
ssotherwiseag
ry,Incoterms2
sfordamage,
mentdirectlyaga
fiedEXW,Purc
ySellerofanyd
ceipt.Purchase
bedeemedasa
ssagreedother
alshipmentsof
rthetermsofth
ARRANTY:Selle
itscurrentappli
orporatedbyref
ATENTS:Purcha
ragainstallcla
andexpensest
asonofanyinfr
ntorpatentsari
eequipment
haser’sdetailed
r.
USPENSIONOR
ension,ordelay
rallreasonable
suspensionor
onableprofit.A
ge,disposition,
esolelybyPurch
SofSAL
’sbenefittopr
geuntilisthego
DDELIVERY:Pu
nformationand
eryschedule,in
andSellersha
hipmentdatesi
reestimateso
rmofthisagreem
aseroritscusto
ndirect,forany
oftheseverityof
greed,allshipm
2010,andPurc
delay,orshort
ainstthecarrier
chasershallins
damageorshort
ragreesthatfai
cceptanceofth
rwiseintheor
completeditem
heorder.
erwarrantsthe
cableSeller’sPr
ferencehere.
aseragreesthat
aims,demands
towhichtheSel
ringementoralle
isingoutofperf
isconstructed
ddrawingsor
RDELAY:IfP
ysSeller’swork
andnecessary
delay,plusS
Additionally,all
and/orresump
haser.
E
rotectSeller’si
oodsarefullypa
rchasermustp
instructionsreg
ncludinganyre
alluseitsreas
ntheorder.Ho
onlyandaren
ment.Sellersha
omerforanyda
delayinshipm
fthedelay.
mentsareEXWS
chasershallma
tagearisingfro
.Whenshipme
spectthegood
tagewithinseve
iluretosonotify
egoods.
rder,Sellermay
msforpartialpa
egoodsinacco
roductwarranty,
titshallindemn
,damages,pe
llermaybecome
egedinfringeme
formanceofthis
inaccordance
designssubmit
Purchaserrequ
k,Purchasersh
costsincurred
eller’soverhea
chargesandri
ptionofworks
nterest
idfor.
provide
garding
equired
sonable
owever,
neither
allhave
mages,
mentor
Seller’s
akeall
omany
entsare
ds,and
endays
ySeller
ymake
ayment
ordance
,which
nifythe
nalties,
eliable
entofa
sorder
ewith
ttedto
uestsa
allpay
dueto
adand
sksfor
hallbe
W^K͕>>͘
10. LIMITAT
NOTWITHST
TOTHEC
WHETHER
REMEDYT
PURPOSES,
LIABILITY,IN
LOSSOFUS
CAPITAL;SU
SPECIAL,
COLLATERA
CLAIMSBY
CUSTOMER
SIMILARTY
ordeferral
exclusionan
costofcap
services,do
ofcontract
downtime,
threatened
responset
propertyan
meetother
customersf
punitive,an
lossesor
characterize
SELLER’SAG
CLAIMSARI
SERVICESP
AGREEMEN
NEGLIGENC
SHALLNOT
VALUEOFT
THEFOREG
PURCHASER
THEIRESSEN
11.CHANG
obligatedto
ofthewor
writingtoth
scheduleor
toanylaw
requiremen
entitleSelle
timeofperf
Purchasera
labor,mate
adjustment,
approvedin
12.CHANG
Purchaser,S
ofthegood
TIONOFLIABILIT
TANDINGANYTH
CONTRARY,SEL
INCONTRACT,
TOACHIEVEIT
TORT(INCLU
NDEMNITY,ORA
SE,REVENUE,SA
UBSTITUTEUSE
LIQUIDATED,
L,INCIDENTALO
PURCHASERFO
S;ORANYO
PE.“Consequen
ofproduction,
ndlossofreven
pital,overhead,
owntimecosts,
orbusinessinte
costsrelatingt
release,remed
oanyhazardo
ndequipment,
contractualco
foranyofthefo
ndspeculative
damagesof
ed.
GGREGATELIAB
SINGOUTOFO
PROVIDEDORO
T,WHETHERIN
CE),STRICTPROD
EXCEEDFIFTY
THEORDERUND
GOINGLIMITATI
R’SREMEDIESUN
NTIALPURPOSE.
GESANDBACKC
omakeanychan
rkunlessSeller
hedetailsofthe
rothercontract
w,rule,regulati
ntwhichrequire
ertoanequitab
formance.
agreesnottore
erials,orother
,serviceorrep
nwritingbyana
GESINDESIGN
Sellermaymod
dsinordertoin
TY:
HINGELSEINTH
LLERSHALLNO
,WARRANTY,
TSINTENDED
UDINGNEGLIG
ANYOTHERLEG
AVINGS,ORPR
ORPERFORMA
PUNITIVE,
ORCONSEQUEN
ORDAMAGESO
THERLOSSES
ntialDamages”
,lossofprodu
nue,profitoran
costofsubstitu
increasedcosto
erruption,facilit
ocleanup,rem
diation,ordisp
ousmaterial,i
lossesresulting
mmitments,cla
oregoing,andsp
damages,asw
anytypeno
BILITYTOPURC
RRELATEDTOG
OTHERWISEREL
NCONTRACT,TO
DUCTLIABILITYO
PERCENT(50%)
DERWHICHTHE
ONSHALLAPPL
NDERTHISAGRE
.
CHARGES:Sell
ngesinoradditio
randPurchase
changeandany
tualmodificatio
ion,order,cod
esanychange
bleadjustmenti
eturngoodsor
costsincurred
pairofgoodsu
uthorizedemplo
:Uponwritten
ifythedesigna
ncorporateimpr
Page2
HEAGREEMENT
OTBELIABLE,
FAILUREOFA
ORESSENTIAL
GENCE),STRICT
GALTHEORYFOR
OFIT;COSTSOF
ANCE;INDIRECT,
EXEMPLARY,
NTIALDAMAGES;
OFPURCHASER'S
ORCOSTSOF
shallmeanloss
ct,lossofuse,
nticipatedprofit,
uteproductsor
ofworking,loss
ty,vessel,orrig
oval,releaseor
posaloforany
nabilitytouse
fromfailureto
imsofaparty’s
ecial,incidental,
wellasindirect
omatterhow
HASERFORALL
GOODSSOLDOR
LATEDTOTHIS
ORT(INCLUDING
OROTHERWISE,
OFTHETOTAL
ECLAIMAROSE
LYEVENIFTHE
EEMENTFAILOF
ershallnotbe
onstothescope
rfirstagreein
yresultingprice,
ons.Anychange
de,standardor
hereundershal
inthepriceand
backchargefor
inmodification,
nlesspreviously
oyeeofSeller.
nnotificationto
andconstruction
rovementsorto
2of3
T
,
A
L
T
R
F
,
,
;
S
F
s
,
,
r
s
g
r
y
e
o
s
,
t
w
L
R
S
G
,
L
.
E
F
e
e
n
,
e
r
l
d
r
,
y
o
n
o
subst
specif
modif
13.D
gover
alloy,
parto
which
order
consid
anex
anyg
once
expor
termi
14.
furnis
conne
goods
Seller
15.F
respo
defau
failur
obliga
cause
earth
(whet
rioto
action
date
autho
labor
distur
trans
reaso
give
Force
endt
Majeu
perfo
tothe
16.
interp
Utah,
The
Contr
Purch
Purch
subm
state
exclus
confli
titutemateriale
fied.Nochar
ficationsmadea
DUALUSEITEM
rnmentexportr
HastelloyCͲ276
ofanyorderfal
hSellerisrequi
rincludesadu
deredaccepted
xportlicense.Fu
goodrequiring
Sellerhasthata
rtlicensetheo
inatedbyForce
PROPRIETARY
shedbySeller
ectionwiththe
sandshallnotb
r’sprior,written
FORCEMAJEUR
onsibletoPur
ultedunderorb
eordelayin
ationsunderthi
edby,orresults
hquakeorexpl
therwarisdecl
orothercivilunr
ns,embargoeso
ofthisagreem
ority;(g)nation
stoppageso
rbances;(i)s
portationfacilit
onablecontrolof
Purchasernotic
eMajeureeven
thefailureord
ureareminimiz
ormanceitshall
eperiodofForce
GOVERNINGL
pretedinaccor
,U.S.A.,withou
applicationof
ractsfortheInt
hasershallcomp
haserirrevocably
mitthemselves
orfederalcou
sivejurisdiction
ictsarisingfrom
equal,orsuper
rgeshallbem
atSeller’soption
MS:Inaccordan
rules,itemsmad
6alloy,andInco
llintothecateg
redtoobtaina
ualusealloy,t
untiltheU.S.g
urthermore,the
regulatoryapp
approval.Ifthe
rderwillbecon
Majeure.
INFORMATION
rissolelyfor
emaintenance
bedisclosedtoa
nconsent.
RE:Sellersh
rchaser,norb
breachedthisa
fulfillingorp
isagreementifs
sfrom,(a)acts
losion;(c)war
aredornot),te
rest;(d)govern
orblockadesin
ment;(f)action
alorregionale
orslowdowns
shortageofa
ties;or(j)othe
fSeller(“Force
cewithinarea
tandshalluse
elayandensur
zed.Shouldthe
beextendedfo
eMajeureandit
LAW:This
rdancewiththe
tregardtoitsc
theUnitedNa
ternationalSale
plywithallappli
yandunconditi
to,theexclusiv
rtsofSaltLake
nandvenuef
orpursuantto
rior,tothator
adetoPurchas
n.
ncewithcurren
defromHastello
onel718alloy,f
goryof“dualus
nexportlicense
theorderwill
governmenthas
edeliverysched
provalshallonl
governmentde
nsideredtohav
N:Allinfor
rPurchaser’s
andoperation
anythirdpartyw
hallnotbeliab
bedeemedto
agreement,for
performingany
suchfailureord
ofGod;(b)floo
r,invasion,ho
erroristthreatso
mentorderorl
effectonoraf
byanygovern
emergency;(h)
orotherind
adequatepow
ereventsbeyo
Majeure”).Selle
asonabletime
reasonableeff
etheeffectsof
reeverbeanyt
oratimeperiod
tsconsequences
agreementsh
elawsoftheSt
conflictsoflaws
ationsConventi
ofGoodsisexc
icablelaws.Sel
onallyconsentt
vejurisdiction
eCounty,Utah,
fortheresolut
thisagreement.
riginally
serfor
ntU.S.
oyCͲ22
orming
se,”for
e.Ifan
notbe
issued
dulefor
ystart
niesan
ebeen
mation
usein
ofthe
without
blenor
ohave
Seller's
ofits
delayis
od,fire,
stilities
oracts,
aw;(e)
fterthe
mental
strikes,
dustrial
weror
ndthe
ershall
ofthe
fortsto
fForce
timeof
dequal
s.
allbe
tateof
srules.
ionon
cluded.
lerand
to,and
ofthe
asthe
tionof
.
17.INDEMN
Purchaserh
liabilityincu
claimsforp
property,t
Sellershall
andsettlea
iscondition
warrantyp
providingre
claim.
18.U.S.
Purchasera
withapplica
sale,expor
usageofth
anyexport
suchgoods
used,expor
disposedof
withsucha
beacondit
obligations
regulations
tocomplyw
oftheU.S
Department
UnitedStat
exportorp
ultimatede
countryliste
Commerce
restricteda
TradeCon
NITY:Sellersha
harmlessfrom
urredbyPurcha
personalinjury,
otheextentc
havethesoleau
anyindemnified
nedonPurcha
eriod,notifying
easonablecoop
EXPORTCOM
acknowledgesth
ableexportlaws
rtation,transfe
hegoodsprovid
licenserequire
shallnotatan
rted,sold,trans
finamannerth
applicableexpor
tionofSeller’s
thatcomplianc
bemaintained
withallapplicab
S.Commerce,
tsorotheragen
tes.Purchaser
permitthereͲex
estinationofa
edbytheDepa
ortheDepa
nd/orindividual
ntrols’Debarre
allindemnify,d
anyclaim,cau
aserasaresult
,deathordam
causedbySelle
uthoritytodirec
claim.Seller’s
aser(a)promp
gSellerofany
perationinthe
PLIANCE:Fu
hatSellerisreq
sandregulation
er,assignment,
dedunderthe
ements.Purcha
nytimedirectly
sferred,assigne
atwillresultin
rtlawsandregu
continuingper
cewithsuche
atalltimes.P
bleexportlaws
Treasury,State
ncyregulatinge
agreesitwill
xportofanySe
restrictedand
rtmentofState,
artmentofTr
lsontheDirecto
dListandN
Page3
efendandhold
seofactionor
tofthirdparty
magetotangible
er'snegligence
ctthedefenseof
indemnification
ptly,withinthe
claim,and(b)
defenseofany
urthermore,as
uiredtocomply
srelatingtothe
disposal,and
order,including
aseragreesthat
orindirectlybe
ed,orotherwise
nonͲcompliance
ulations.Itshal
formanceofits
xportlawsand
urchaseragrees
andregulations
eandDefense
xportsfromthe
notexport,reͲ
ellergoodtoan
d/orembargoed
,Departmentof
reasuryand/or
orateofDefense
Nonproliferation
3of3
d
r
y
e
.
f
n
e
)
y
s
y
e
d
g
t
e
e
e
l
s
d
s
s
e
e
Ͳ
n
d
f
r
e
n
Sanct
Perso
ofFo
Listo
expor
good
Toth
utilize
provis
incorp
toex
agree
partie
agent
specif
regula
PURC
HARM
PENA
COMP
REGU
19.E
entire
super
repre
andis
byan
tionList,Burea
on’sList,EntityL
reignAssetsCo
oranyotherU.S
rt,reͲexportor
foranyprohibit
heextentthatP
esagentsor
sionoftheS
poratetheoblig
portcompliance
ementswithsu
es.Allcontrac
ts,affiliates,or
ficrequiremen
ations(including
CHASERAGREES
MLESSFROM
ALTIES,SANCTIO
PLIANCEWITH
ULATIONS.
ENTIREAGREEM
eagreement
rsedesany
esentations,ora
snotsubjectto
nauthorizedoffic
uofIndustrya
ListandUnverif
ontrol’sSpecially
S.governmentl
rpermitthere
tedusesundert
Purchasersubco
thirdͲpartiesw
ServicestoSe
gationsofthisp
eintoitsrespec
uchsubͲcontrac
ctsenteredint
rthirdͲparties,
nttocomply
gU.S.exportlaw
STOINDEMNIF
ANYANDALL
ONSANDFINES
HAPPLICABLE
MENT:Thispr
betweenthe
yprevious
agreements,wh
modificationex
cerofeachpart
andSecurity’s
fiedListandthe
yDesignatedNa
list.NorwillCu
eͲexportofany
theU.S.exportla
ontractsitsserv
withrespectt
eller,Purchaser
provisionwithr
ctivesubcontrac
ctedagentsand
tobyPurchase
mustalsoinc
withalllaw
ws).
FYANDHOLD
LCOSTS,LIAB
SRELATEDTO
EXPORTLAWS
roposalexpress
partiesheret
communic
hetheroralorw
xceptinwriting,
y.
Denied
eOffice
ationals
stomer
ySeller
aws.
vicesor
tothe
rshall
respect
ctsand
dthird
erwith
cludea
wsand
SELLER
ILITIES,
NONͲ
SAND
sesthe
oand
cations,
written,
signed
COVERAG
workman
designed
WARRAN
productw
occursfir
REMEDIE
period,W
orreplac
CLAIMSB
ARISESB
CLAIM,
(INCLUDI
LIMITATI
OWNER’
discovery
facility,o
EXCLUSIO
duringm
storage,
performe
accessor
warranty
products
damages
SELLERM
WARRAN
PARTICU
ARISEFR
STATUTO
GE:WSP(S
nshipwhen
d.
NTYPERIOD
wasplacedi
rst.
ES:Ifthepro
WSP’ssoleo
cementofth
BASEDONF
BEFORE,DU
HOWEVER
INGNEGLIG
ONSOFLIAB
SOBLIGATI
y.A tOwner’
orbyreturni
ONS:Thisw
maintenance;
neglect,ora
edoutside
iesnotman
y.Sellersha
s.Sellersha
sordelaysre
MAKESNOO
NTIESINCLU
ULARPURPO
ROMCOUR
ORYWARRA
L
Seller)warra
operated
D:Thiswarr
intoservice,
oductfailsd
bligationaft
heproduct.
FAILUREOF
RING,ORA
DESCRIBED,
GENCE),ST
BILITYFOUN
IONS:Owne
’sexpense,t
ngtheprod
warrantydoe
;anddefect
accident.Th
Seller’sfa
nufactured
allnotbelia
allnotbe
esultingfrom
OTHERWAR
UDING,WIT
OSE,MERCH
RSEOFDEA
ANTIES.
IMITED
antsitspro
underthe
rantycovers
,oreighteen
duetodefec
terverificati
THISPARAG
ORDEFECT
AFTERTHEA
,ISBASED
RICTLIABIL
NDHEREOR
ershallnot
thedefectm
ucttoSeller
esnotapply
tsresultingf
iswarranty
ctorywitho
bySellera
ableforcos
liablefora
morrelated
RRANTIES,E
THOUTLIM
HANTABILIT
ALINGORU
DWARR
oductstob
normalcon
saperiod
n(ϯϲ)mont h
ctivemateria
onofthede
GRAPHPROV
INAPRODU
APPLICABLE
ONCONT
LITY,ORO
ELSEWHERE
tifySellero
maybeverifi
r’sfactory.
ytoconsum
fromimprop
doesnotcov
outSeller’s
rewarrante
stsofremo
anyconsequ
todefective
XPRESSOR
MITATION,A
TY,ANDAN
USAGEOFT
RANTY
befreefrom
nditionsfor
oftwelve(
hsfromthe
alsorworkm
efect,shallb
VIDESTHEEX
UCT,WHETH
WARRANTY
TRACT,WAR
THERWISE,
EINTHETER
ofadefect
edatOwne
mableitems
perinstallati
veranyexpe
sprioraut
edonlyby
oval,transpo
uential,spe
eproducts.
IMPLIED,A
ANYWARR
NYIMPLIED
TRADE.SE
mdefectsi
rwhichthe
(Ϯϰ)m o n t hs
dateofship
manshipwit
beatitsdisc
XCLUSIVERE
HERTHEFAI
YPERIODA
RRANTY,IN
ANDISS
RMSANDCO
withinten
r’ssite,atSe
sthatareno
ion,operatio
enseforrep
horization.
theorigina
ortation,or
ecial,incide
ANDDISCLAI
RANTYOF
DWARRANT
ELLERALSO
nmaterials
eproducts
sfromthe
pment,which
hinthewar
cretionther
EMEDIESFO
LUREORDE
ANDWHETH
DEMNITY,T
UBJECTTO
ONDITIONS.
(10) dayso
eller’sautho
ormallyrep
on,mainten
pairsoralter
Equipment
lmanufactu
reinstallatio
ntal,orind
MSALLIMP
FITNESSFO
TYTHATCO
DISCLAIMS
sand
were
date
hever
ranty
repair
RALL
EFECT
HERA
TORT
OALL
ofits
orized
laced
ance,
ration
and
urer’s
onof
direct
PLIED
ORA
OULD
SALL
W^K͕>>͘
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 1 OA4
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE: WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion
Award of Bid and Approval of Construction Contract to The Ewing Company, Inc. for
the "WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of
$9,729,000.00 with 2017 spending authority of $4,075,037.00
MEETING NOTES
Rf APPROIED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Page 1
Memo
To: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk,
From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager
CC: Troy Thrall
Date: 5/18/2017
Re: May 23rd City Council Meeting Agenda Item
The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the
May 23rd City Council Agenda under a Purchasing/Public Works Department Report for
Council’s consideration.
Award of Bid and Approval of Construction Contract to The Ewing Company, Inc. for
the “WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of
$9,729,000.00 with 2017 spending authority of $4,075,037.00.
Recommended Council Action: Approval of Construction Contract to The
Ewing Company, Inc. for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $9,729,000.00 and
authority to expend $4,075,037.00 in fiscal year 2017.
Thank you for your consideration.
City of Meridian
Purchasing Dept.
CONTRACT CHECKLIST
Date: REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Project Name:
Project Manager: Contract Amount:
Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer:
Is this a change order? Yes No Change Order No.
Fund: Budget Available ( Purchasing attach report ):
Department Yes No Construction
GL Account FY Budget: Task Order
Project Number: Enhancement: Yes No Professional Service
Equipment
Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No Grant
Grant #: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status (Federal Funded)
Print and Attach the determination Print, attach and amend bid by addendum (if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach
Master Agreement Category
(Bid Results Attached) Yes No (Ratings Attached) Yes No Date MSA Roster Approved:
Typical Award Yes No
If no please state circumstances and conclusion:
Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends:
PW License Expiration Date: Corporation Status
Insurance Certificates Received (Date): Expiration Date: Rating:
Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): Rating: A++
Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes No
(Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000)
Reason Consultant Selected 1 Performance on past projects
Check all that apply Quality of work On Budget
On Time Accuracy of Construction Est
2 Qualified Personnel
3 Availability of personnel
4 Local of personnel
Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation:
Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: By:
Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted
(Only for PW Construction Projects)
NTP Date:
Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Goodstanding PWC-C-12003 7/31/2017
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
17-18-19
4/4/2017 PUBLIC WORKS
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION
V. BASIS OF AWARD
IV. GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded projects
VI. CONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION
May 18, 2017
VIII. AWARD INFORMATION
Approval Date
Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved
VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete)
5/18/2017
Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected
TROY THRALL
If yes, has policy been purchased?
/ Brown & Caldwell
III. Contract Type II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete)
TASK ORDER RFP / RFQ BID
CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION . CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT # 10044.1
INTRODUCTION
WHEREAS, the Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent
to perform and has agreed to provide such services;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants,
terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Scope of Work:
1.1 CONTRACTOR shall perform and furnish to the City upon execution of this
Contract and receipt of the City's written notice to proceed, all services and work,
and comply in all respects, as specified in the document titled "Scope of Work" a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this
reference, together with any amendments that may be agreed to in writing by the
parties.
1.2 All documents, drawings and written work product prepared or produced by
the Contractor under this Agreement, including without limitation electronic data
files, are the property of the Contractor; provided, however, the City shall have the
right to reproduce, publish and use all such work, or any part thereof, in any
manner and for any purposes whatsoever and to authorize others to do so. lf any
such work is copyrightable, the Contractor may copyright the same, except that, as
to any work which is copyrighted by the Contractor, the City reserves a royalty-free,
non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use such work, or
any part thereof, and to authorize others to do so.
1.3 The Contractor shall provide services and work under this Agreement
consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable federal,
state and city laws, ordinances, regulations and resolutions. The Contractor
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION - CONSTRUCTION page 1 of 15
Project 10044.1
THIS CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION is made this 23'd day
of May, 2O17, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal
corporation organized under the laws of the State of ldaho, hereinafter referred to as
"CITY', 33 East BroadwayAvenue, Meridian, ldaho 83642, and The Ewinq Companv. lnc..,
hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR", whose business address is 1500 Eldorado. Ste
4. Boise, lD 83704 and whose Public Works Contractor License # is PWC-C-12003.
Whereas, the City has a need for services involving Waste Water Treatment
Facilitv Construction; and
represents and warrants that it will perform its work in accordance with generally
accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or professions that
are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of
performance of this Agreement. Except for that representation and any
representations made or contained in any proposal submitted by the Contractor
and any reports or opinions prepared or issued as part of the work performed by
the Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor makes no other warranties, either
express or implied, as part of this Agreement.
1 .4 Services and work provided by the Contractor at the City's request underthis
Agreement will be performed in a timely manner in accordance with a Schedule of
Work, which the parties hereto shall agree to. The Schedule of Work may be
revised from time to time upon mutual written consent of the parties.
2. Consideration
2.1 The Contractor shall be compensated on a Not-To-Exceed basis as provided
in Exhibit B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by reference made a part
hereof for the Not-To-Exceed amount of I 729 000.00
2.2 The Contractor shall provide the City with a monthly statement and
supporting invoices, as the work warrants, of fees earned and costs incurred for
services provided during the billing period, which the City will pay within 30 days of
receiptof a correct invoice and approval bythe City. The Citywill notwithhold any
Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax from any payment made by
City to Contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. payment of
all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of
Contractor.
2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor shall not be
entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration, compensation, salary,
wages, or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement
including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, transportation, drawings, renderings or
mockups. Specifically, Contractor shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement
to consideration in the form of overtime, health insurance benefits, retirement
benefits, paid holidays or other paid leaves of absence of any type or kind
whatsoever.
3. Funding:
Funding for this project will be split between three fiscal years, 2017 (Oct. 2016 -Sept. 2017) $4,075,037.00, 2018 (Oct. 2017 - Sept. 2018) estimated at
$5,439,31 6.00 and 201 9 (Oct. 2018 - Sept. 2019) estimated at $214,647.00. The
amounts estimated beyond the 2017 fiscal year have not yet been appropriated by
the City. Contractor may NOT expend more than the amount specified and
approved for a specific fiscal year. Any and all additional expenditures beyond the
current fiscal year MUST be approved by City Council and memorialized by a
written amendment or change order to this Agreement.
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACIry EXPANSION - CONSTRUCTION
Project 10044.1
page 2 of 15
4. Term:
4.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, and
shall expire upon (a) completion of the agreed upon work, (b) or unless sooner
terminated as provided in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and Section 4 below or unless some
other method or time of termination is listed in Exhibil A.
4.2 Should Contractor default in the performance of this Agreement or materially
breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this Agreement by
giving written notification to Contractor.
4.3 Should City fail to pay Contractor all or any part of the compensation set forth
in Exhibit B of this Agreement on the date due, Contractor, at the Contractor's
option, may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not remedied by the City
within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due.
5. Liquidated Damages:
There are 10 milestones stated in the Milestone/Payment Schedule. Contractor
shall be liable to the City for any delay for Milestones 1-8 beyond the stated time
period in the amount of $250.00 (two hundred fifty dollars) per calendar day. Such
payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of
any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty.
Substantial Completion shall be accomplished within 854 (eight hundred fifty four)
calendar days from Notice to Proceed. This project shall be considered
Substantially Complete when the Owner has full and unrestricted use and benefit
of the facilities, both from an operational and safety standpoint, and only minor
incidental work, corrections or repairs remain for the physical completion of the
total contract. Contractor shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time
period in the amount of $500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such
payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of
any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty.
Upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall have 896 (eight hundred
ninety six) calendar days to complete the work as described herein. Contractor
shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time period in the amount of
$500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed
to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because
of such delay and not be construed as a penalty. See Milestones listed in the
Payment Schedule for Substantial Completion.
6.1 lf , through any cause, CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, or agents fails
to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates
any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any
WRHF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION. CONSTRUCTION PAgE 3 OI 15
Project 10044.1
6. Termination:
record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in
fraud, dishonesty, or any olher act of misconduct in the performance of this
contract, or if the City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in
the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to lerminate this
Agreement by giving written notice to CONTRACTOR of such termination and
specifying the effective date thereof at least fifteen (15) days before the effective
date of such termination. CONTRACTOR may terminate this agreement at any
time by giving at least sixty (60) days notice to CITY.
ln the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or unfinished
documents, data, and reports prepared by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement
shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and CONTRACTOR shall be
entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily
complete hereunder.
6.2 Notwithstanding the above, CONTRACTOR shall not be relieved of liability to
the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this
Agreement by CONTRACTOR, and the CITY may withhold any payments to
CONTRACTOR for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of
damages due the CITY from CONTRACTOR is determined. This provision shall
survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve CONTRACTOR of
its liability to the Clry for damages.
7. lndependentContractor:
7.1 ln all matters pertaining to this agreement, CONTRACTOR shall be acting as
an independent contractor, and neither CONTRACTOR nor any oflicer, employee
or agent of CONTRACTOR will be deemed an employee of CITY. Except as
expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to
exercise any rights or power vested in the City and therefore has no authority to
bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the City. The selection and designation of
the personnel of the CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by
the CITY.
7.2 Conlractor, its agents, officers, and employees are and at alltimes during the
term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent
contractors and not as employees of the City.
7.3 Contractor shalldetermine the method, details and means of performing the
work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor
shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this
Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreemenl, shall not be
subjected to City's control wilh respect to the physical action or activities of
Contractor in f ullillment of this Agreement. lf in the performance of this Agreement
any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and
exclusively under the direction and supervision and control of the Contractor.
WRRF HEADWOFIKS CAPACITY EXPANSION. CONSTRUCTION
Project 10044.1
page 4 of 15
8. Sub-Contractors:
Contractor shall require that all of its sub-contractors be licensed per State of ldaho
Statute # 54-1901
9. Removal of Unsatisfactory Employees:
The Contractor shall only f urnish employees who are competent and skilled for work
under this contract. lf , in the opinion of the City, an employee of the Contractor is
incompetent or disorderly, refuses to perform in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the conlract, threatens or uses abusive language while on City
property, or is otherwise unsatisfactory, that employee shall be removed from all
work under this contract.
10. lndemnificationandlnsurance:
10.1 CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY and it's
elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and for any and
all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or in.iury to persons or property
and losses and expenses and other costs including litigation costs and attorney's
fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the performance of this
Agreement by the CONTRACTOR, its servants, agents, officers, employees,
guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortious
conduct of CITY or its employees. CONTRACTOR shall maintain. and soecifically
aorees that it will maintain, throuqho the term of this Aoreement. liabilitv
insurance. in which the CITY shall be named an additional ins ured in the minimum
amounts as follow: General Liability One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) per incident
or occurrence, Automobile Liability lnsurance One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per
incident or occurrence and Workers' Compensation lnsurance, in the statutory
limits as required by law.. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation
of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY; and if CITY
becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein provided,
CONTRACTOR covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless
CITY from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or
injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation costs and
attorneys' fees, arising out of, resulting from , or in connection with the
performance of this Agreement by the Contractor or Contractor's officers, employs,
agents, represenlatives or subcontractors and resulting in or attributable to
personal in.jury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible or intangible property,
including use of. CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY with a Certificate of
lnsurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing CONTRACTOR'S compliance
with the requirements of this paragraph and lile such proof of insurance with the
CITY at least ten (10) days prior to the date Contractor begins performance of it's
obligations under this Agreement. ln the event the insurance minimums are
changed, CONTRACTOR shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the
changed limits. Evidence of all insurance shall be submitted to the City Purchasing
Agent with a copy to Meridian City Accounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue,
Meridian, ldaho 83642.
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION - CONSTRUCTION
Project 10044.1
page 5 of 15
10.2 lnsurance is to be placed with an ldaho admitted insurer with a Best's rating
of no less than A-.
10.3 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be declared
in writing and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles, self-insured retentions or named
insureds; or the Contractor shall provide a bond, cash or letter of credit
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
10.4 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, Contractor's lnsurance
coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City's elected officers, oflicials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City
or the City's elected off icers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be excess of
the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with Contractor's insurance
excepl as to the extent of City's negligence.
10.5 The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability.
10.6 All insurance coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the
insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein.
11. Time is of the Essence:
The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is slrictly of the essence with
respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof , and that the failure
to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of , and
a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform.
12. Bonds:
Payment and Performance Bonds are required on all Public Works lmprovement
Projects per the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications &
Drawings to the ISPWC, which by this reference are made a part hereof.
Conlractor is required to furnish faithful performance and payment bonds in the
amount of 100% of the contract price issued by surety licensed to do business in
the State of ldaho. ln the event that the contract is subsequently terminated for
failure to perform, the contractor and/or surety will be liable and assessed for any
and all costs for the re-procurement of the contract services.
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION - CONSTRUCTION
Project 10044.1
page6ofl5
10.7 The limits ol insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the
Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
13. Warranty:
All construction and equipment provided under this agreement shall be warranted
for 2 years f rom the date of the City of Meridian acceptance per the ISPWC and the
Meridian Supplemental Specif ications & Drawings to the ISPWC and any
modifications, which by this reference are made a part hereof.
All items found to be defective during a warranly inspection and subsequently
corrected will require an additional two (2) year warranty from the date of City's
acceptance of the corrected work.
14. Changes:
The CITY may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Work to be
performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the
amount of CONTRACTOR'S compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and
between the CITY and CONTRACTOR, shall be incorporated in written
amendments which shall be executed with the same formalities as this Agreement.
15. Taxes:
16. MeridianStormwaterSpecifications:
All construction projects require either a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) or an erosion sediment control plan (ESCP) as specified in the City of
Meridian Construction Stormwater Management Program (CSWMP) manual. The
CSWMP manual containing the procedures and guidelines can be found at this
address: http://www.meridiancitv.orq/e nviron mental. asox?id= 1 361 8
Contractor shall relain all stormwater and erosion control documentation generated
on site during construction including the SWPPP manual, field inspections and
amendments. Prior to final acceptance of the job by the City the contractor shall
relurn the field SWPPP manual and field inspection documents to the City for
review. A completed Contractor Request to File Project N.O.T. with the EPA form
shall be provided to the City with the documents. These documents shall be
retained, reviewed and approved by the City prior to f inal acceptance of the project.
17. ACHD:
Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with the City to obtain appropriate
ACHD permit(s) and will reimburse the City for fees, tines, or penalties City incurs
due to Contractoas violation of any ACHD policy. City shall certify to ACHD that
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACIry EXPANSION - CONSTRUCTION page 7 of 15
Project 10044.1
The City of Meridian is exempt from Federal and State taxes and will execute the
required exemption certificates for items purchased and used by the City. ltems
purchased by the City and used by a contractor are subject to Use Tax. All other
taxes are the responsibility of the Contractor and are to be included in the
Contractor's Bid pricing.
18. Reports and lnformation:
18.1 At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be
furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as
the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement.
18.2 Contractor shall maintain all writings, documents and records prepared or
compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a minimum of
four (4) years from the termination or completion of this or Agreement. This
includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static, photographic and every
other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or
representation including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols or any
combination thereof.
19. Audits and lnspections:
No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to
copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CITY shall have
unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any
reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement.
21. Equal Employment Opportunity:
ln performing the work herein, Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of
Title Vl and Vll of the Civil Rights Act, Revenue Sharing Act Title 31, U.S. Code
Section 2176. Specifically, the Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national
origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. Contractor will take
affirmative action during employment or training to insure that employees are
treated without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political
affiliation, marital status, or handicap. ln performing the Work required herein,
CONTRACTOR shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or
local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race, color, religion,
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION . CONSTRUCTION
Project 10044.1
Contractor is authorized to obtain a Temporary Highway and Right-otway Use
Permit from ACHD on City's behalf. The parties acknowledge and agree that the
scope of the agency granted by such certification is limited to, and conterminous
with, the term and scope of this Agreement.
At any time during normal business hours and as often as the CITY may deem
necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all ot
CONTRACTOR'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall permit the CITY to audit, examine, and make excerpts or
transcripts trom such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices,
materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data
relating to all matlers covered by this Agreement.
20. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material:
page 8 of 15
sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability.
22. Employment ol Bona Fide ldaho Residents:
Contractor must comply with ldaho State Statute 44-1002 which states that the
Contractor employ ninety-five percent (95%) bona fide ldaho residents.
23. Advice of Attorney:
Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement. lt has
received independent legal advice from its attorney's or the opportunity to seek such
advice.
24. Attorney Fees:
Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as
may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys'fees as determined by a
Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate
contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture
of this Agreement.
25. ConstructionandSeverabalaty:
lf any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will
not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as
the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion.
26. Waiver of Default:
27. Entire Agreement:
28. Assignment:
It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that CONTRACTOR
shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights under
this Agreement except upon the prior express wrilten consent of CITY.
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION . CONSTBUCTION
Project 10044.1
page I of 15
Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver
of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement
shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall
not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this
Agreement is modified as provided above.
This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any
and all other agreements or understandings, oralof written, whether previous to the
execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith.
29. Payment Request:
Payment requests shall be submitted to City of Meridian through the City's proiect
management softvvare. The Project Manager will compare the invoice against the
Payment Schedule in the Agreement for compliance. Upon approval that the work
has been done and is in compliance with the Agreement, the Project Manager will
approve the pay request for processing. City of Meridian payment terms are Net 30
from the date City receives a correct invoice. Final payment will not be released
until the City has received a tax release from the Tax Commission.
30. Cleanup:
Contractor shall keep the worksite clean and free from debris. At completion of
work and prior to requesting final inspection, the Contractor shall remove all traces
of waste materials and debris resulting from the work. Final payment will not be
made if cleanup has not been performed.
31. Order ol Precedence:
The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement, the lnvitation for Bid
document, then the winning bidders submitted bid document.
ln performing the scope of work required hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall comply
with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local
governments.
33. Applicable Law:
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of ldaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian.
34. Notices:
Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless
otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed
communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt
requested, addressed as follows:
CONTRACTOR
NAME
Attn:
Address
Address
Phone:
Email:
ldaho Public Works License # PWC-C-
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION . CONSTRUCTION
Project '10044.1
page 10 of 15
32. Compliance with Laws:
CITY
City of Meridian
Purchasing Manager
33 E Broadway Ave
Meridian, lD 83642
208-489-0417
Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving
written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided.
35. Approval Required:
This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of
Meridian.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
BY:
TAMMY de WEEfIAD, MAYOR
Dated: �C7
Approved by Council:
Attest:
CJ CO S, CI CLERK
Purchasing A proval
BY: A�—&
KEITH TS, Purchasing Manager
Dated:: Zi 0! `7
Project Manager
Troy Thrall
THE EWING POMPANY, INC.
BY:
JOHN EVVING, PR SIDENT
Dated: -5 // P A91 7
r G-�
yle7y w�
O
Deparknt App
BY: /7Pf
WARREN STEWA T, City Engineer
Dated:: `z-- i
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION - CONSTRUCTION page 11 of 15
Project 10044.1
SCOPE OF WORK
. REFER TO INVITATION TO BID PW.1722.10044.I
Al=L ADDENDUMS, ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the
lnvitation to Bid Package # PW-1722-1OO44.1, and the attached Line
ltem Price Schedule (Exhibit C) are by this reference made a part
hereof.
SPECIFICATIONS / SCOPE OF WORK
All construction work shall be done in accordance with the current version
of the ldaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC), the 2013
City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC (and any
Addendums).
See separate attached documents:
Technical Specifications and Drawings by Brown & Caldwell
dated January 2017
o Volume 1 Technical Specilications (593 pages)
o Volume 2 Technical Specilications (471 pages)
o Volume 3 Technical Specifications (269 pages)
o Volume 4 Technical Specilications (539 pages)
o Volume 5 Standard Detail Drawings (157 page)
o Volume 6 Drawings (223 pages)
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION - CONSTRUCTION
Project 10044.1
page 12 of 15
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit B
MILESTONE / PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed
$9,729,000.00.
MILESTONE DATES/SCHEDULE
Preliminary Schedule of Values
14 Days f rom
Conditional
Notice of Award
Milestone 2
Preliminary Schedule of Submittals and Construclion
Schedule
7 Days prior to
Preconslruction
Meetino
Milestone 3 Owner-Accepted Schedule of Values, Schedule of
Submittals and Construction Schedule
28 Days from
Notice to Proceed
Milestone 4 Approval of ALL Submittals 270 Days from
Notice to Proceed
Milestone 5 Approval of Operation & Maintenance Manual Submittal 390 Days from
Notice to Proceed
New Headworks Facilities and Equipment Fully Tested and
Commissioned
440 Days from
Notice to Proceed
Milestone 7 496 Days from
Notice to Proceed
Milestone B Substantial Completion 510 Days from
Notice to Proceed
Milestone 9 Final Completion 545 Days from
Notice to Proceed
Milestone l0 896 Days from
Notice to Proceed
PRICING SCHEDULE
Contract includes furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals as required for the
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION per IFB PW-1722-10044.1
NOT TO EXCEED CONTRACT TOTAL $9J29-000-00
Contr
additi
act is a not to exceed amount, Line item pricing below wlll be used for invoice verilication and any
onal Increases or decreases in work requested by city. The Cily will pay the contractor based on actualquantilies ol each ilem of work in accordance wilh lhe contract documents.
Contract Pricin Schedule
Item No.Description Quantity Unit Unit Price
WBRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION - CONSTBUCTION
Project 10044.1
page 13 of 15
A.
Milestone 1
Milestone 6
Approval of Project Record Documents and Drawings
Final Completion
1 General / Site Work 1 LS 51,7s1,220.00
2 lnfluent Pumo Station includinq Electrical Buildinq 1 LS 52,334,960.00
3 Headworks Buildino include Foul Air Biolilter 1 LS ss,642,820.00
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACITY EXPANSION ' CONSTRUCTION
Project '10044.1
page 14 of 15
EXHIBIT C
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK
WRRF HEADWORKS CAPACIry EXPANSION - CONSTRUCTION
Project 10044.1 Page15 of 15
BI
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
S
S
i
g
n
e
d
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
1
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
#
2
B
i
d
B
o
n
d
L
i
c
#
S
u
b
s
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
At
t
e
s
t
:
T
r
o
y
T
h
r
a
l
l
RS
C
I
JC
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
s
VE
N
D
O
R
Mc
A
l
v
a
i
n
Th
e
E
w
i
n
g
C
o
.
Op
e
n
e
d
b
y
:
K
e
i
t
h
W
a
t
t
s
$9
,
7
2
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
,
2
1
7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
0
,
3
4
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
BA
S
E
B
I
D
A
M
O
U
N
T
$1
2
,
6
1
1
,
6
6
6
.
0
0
DU
E
D
A
T
E
&
T
I
M
E
:
A
p
r
i
l
4
,
2
0
1
7
2
:
3
0
BI
D
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
P
W
-
1
7
2
2
-
1
0
0
4
4
.
I
BI
D
N
A
M
E
:
W
R
R
F
H
E
A
D
W
O
R
K
S
C
A
P
A
C
I
T
Y
E
X
P
A
N
S
I
O
N
Surety
2O2B Halls Mill Road, PO Box 1650
Mitehous€ Station, Nl 08889.1650
Federal Insurance Company
O + 908.903.3485
F + 908.903,3656
Bond No. 82041232
CONTRACTOR
(Name, legal stat,.]6 and address):
The Ewing Company, lnc.
1500 Eldorado, Suite 4
Boise, lD 83704
OWNER
(Name, legal status and address):
City of Meridian
33 East Broadway Ave.
Meridian. lD 83642
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Date: April 25,2017
Amount: $9,729,000.00 Ni
Description (Name and Wation):
SURETY (Name dn d Pincipal Place ofBusiness)r
Federal Insurance Company
2028 Halls Mill Boad, P.O. Box 1650
Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889-1650
ne Million Seven Hundred Twenty Nine Thousand Dollars and 00/100
Meridian WFIRF Headworks Capacity Expansion
BOND
Date(NotearlierthanconstructioncontractDate): May 12' 2017
AIn6911; $9,729,000.00 Nine Million Seven Hundred Twenty Nine Thousand Dollars and 00/100
Modifications to this Bond: E None D Seepage4
CONTRACTORS AS PzuNCIPAL
Company:
The Ewing Companyy'hc
Signature:
(corwrote seql)
SURETY
Company:
Federal Insurance Company
Signature:
Attomey-in-Fact Name:enda J. Sm
,1
{-
-1r.44u1
Name and Title; {, t,
^,
A €n,
fi e ''d cY
Signed and Sealed this 12th day of May, 2017
(Any additional ignarures aryeor on the la* page of this Perform,nce Bond,)
(FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Name, Address and Telephone)
AGENT or BROKER:
Paynewest lnsurance, lnc.
960 Broadway Avenue, Suite 100
Boise, lD 83706
208-424-2900
pinkd in c@perfutiontvith the Atr,ericon lnstitute oJ Archiacts (AIA) by Chubb, The languoge in thb doctrl,rent confornts lo thela,Woge used in
AIA Doo,,ment A312 - 2010.
,.m ls42os7l-EEDG€{, 1il,O
CHL'EIEI
AIA Document A312rrr - 2OlO Performance Bond
Any sirlgular reference to Contractor, Surety, Owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable.
OWNERS REPRESENTATM (Architect Engineer or other wrty):
I x
\,
i\
1. The Contractor and the Surety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns to the Owner for the performance ofthe Construction Contract, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
Z Ifthe Contracror performs the Construction Contract, the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation
under this Bond, except when applicable to participate in a conference as provided in Section3.
3, If there is no O\rner Default under the Construction Contract, the Surety's obligation under this Bond shall
arise after:
J the On'ner first provides notice to the Contractor and the Surety that the Owner is considering declaring
a Contractor Default. Such notice shall indicate whether the owner is requesting a conference among the
Owner, Contractor and Surety to discuss the Contractor's performance. Ifthe Owner does not request a
conference, the Surety may, within five (5) business days after receipt ofthe Ovfner's notice, request such
a conference. Ifthe Surety timely requests a conference, the Owner shall attend. Unless the owner agrees
otherwise, any conference requested underthis Section 3.1shall be held within ten (10)business days ofthe
Surety's receipt ofthe Owner's notice, If the Owner, the Contractor and the Surety agree, the Contractor
shall be allowed a reasonable time to perform the Construction Contract, but such an agreement shall not
rvaive the Owner's right, if any, subsequently to declare a Contractor Default;
2 the Owner declares a Contractor Default, terminates the Construction Contract and notifies the Surety;
and
3 the Owner has agreed to pay the Balance of the Contract Price in accordance with the terms of the
Construction Contract to the Surety or to a contractor selected to perform the Construction Contract.
,L Failure on the part of the Owner to comply with the notice requirement in Section 3.1 shall not constitute
a failure to comply with a condition precedent to the Surety's obligations, or release the Surety from its
obligations, except to the extent the Surety demonstrates actual prejudice,
5. when the owner has satisfied the conditions ofSection3, the Suretyshall prompdy and atthe Surety's expense
take one ofthe following actions:
5J Arrange for the Contractor, ,nrith corBent ofthe Otvner, to perform and complete the Construction Contracq
52 Undertake to perform and complete the Consfuction Contract itself, though its agents or independent
contractors;
53 Obtain bids or negotiated proposals from qualified contractors acceptable to the Owner for a contract for
performance and completion ofthe Construction Contract, arrange for a contract to be prepared for execution
by the Owner and a contractor selected with the Owner's concurrence, to be secured with performance and
pal.rnent bonds executed by a qualified surety equivalent to the bonds issued on the Construction Contract,
and pay to the Owner the amount ofdamages as described in Section 7 in excess of the Balance ofthe Contract
Price incurred by the Owner as a result of Contractor Default; or
5.4 Waive its right to perform and complete, arrange for completion, or obtain a new contractor and with reasonable
promptness under the circumstances:
.l After investigation, determine the amount for rvhich it maybe liable to the Owner and, as soon as practicable
after the amount is determined, make payment to the Owner; or
,2 Deny liability in whole or in part and nodry the owner, citing the reasons for denial'
6, Ifthe Surety does not proceed as provided in Section 5 with reasonable promptness, the Surety shall be deemed
to be in default on this Bond seven days after receipt of an additional written notice from the owner to the
Surery demanding that the Surety perform its obligations under this Bond, and the Orvner shall be entitled to
enforce any remedy available to the Owner. If the Surety proceeds as provided in Section 5.4, and the Owner
refuses the payment or the Surety has denied liability, in whole or in part, without further notice the Owner
shall be entitled to enforce any remedy available to the Owner.
printed in cooperation wlth the Arnerlcan hstitate of Architects (NA) by Chubb. The languqge in this docllment conlorns to the l1nguageused ln
AIAD, nefi A312fl- 2O1O.
Forn rs-o2om-FID Gd. l&46)2
7, If the Surety elects to act under Section 5.1, 5.2 or 5.3, then the responsibilities of the Surety to the Orvner shall not
be geater than those of the Contractor under the Construction Contract, and the responsibilities of the Owner to
the Suety shall not be greater than those ofthe Owner under the Construction Contract. Subject to commitrnent
by the O*,ner to pay the Balance of the Contract P ce, the Surety Is obligated, without duplication, for
J the responsibilitiesofthe Contractor for correction ofdefective workand completionofthe Construction Contract
2 additional legal, design professional and delay costs resulting from the Contractor's Default, and resulting
from the actions or failure to act ofthe Surety under Section 5; and
3 liquidated damages, or ifno liquidated damages are specified in the Construction Contract, actual damages
caused by delayed performance or non.performance of the Contractor.
& Ifthe Surety elects to act under Section 5.1, 5.3 or 5.4, the Surety's liability is limited to the amount oftiis Bond.
9. The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner or others for obligations of the Contractor that are unrelated to
the Construction Contract, and the Balance ofthe Contract Price shall not be reduced or set offon account
ofany such unrelated obtigations, No right ofaction shall accrue on &is Bond to any person or entity other
than the Owner or its heirs, executors, administrators successors and assigns.
tO. The surety hereby waives notice ofany change, induding changes of time, to the Construction Contract or to
related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations.
11 Any proceeding, legal or equitable, under this Bond may be instituted in any court ofcompetentjurisdiction
in the location in which the work or part ofthe work is located and shall be instituted within two years after
a declaration of Contractor Default or within two years after the Contractor ceased working or within two
years after the Surety refuses or fails to perform its obligations under this Bond, whichever occurs first. If
the provisions ofthis Paragraph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to
sureties as a defense in the jurisdiction ofthe suit shall be applicable.
lrl Notice to the Surety, the Owner or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown on the
page on which their siglature appears.
13. When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location
where the construction was to be performed, any provision in this Bond conflictirg with said statutory or legal
requirement shall be deemed deleted herefrom and provisions conforming to such statutory or other legal
requirements shall be deemed incorporated herein. When so fumished, the intent is that this Bond shall be
construed as a statutory bond and not as a common law bond.
14. DEFINITIONS
14,1 Balance of the Contract Price: The total amount payable by the Owner to the Contractor ulder the Construction
Contractafterallproperadjustrnents havebeen made, includingallowance to the Contractorofanyamounts receivedor
to be received by the Owner in setdementofinsurance or otherclaims for damages towhich the Contractor is entitled,
reduced by all valid and proper payments made to or on behalfofthe Contractor under the Consrudion Contract.
l42construction Contract: The agreement between the Owner and the Contractor identified on the cover
page, including all Contract Documents and changes made to the agreement and the Contract Documents.
l4scontractor Defaults Failure of the Contractor, which has not been remedied nor waived, to perform or
otherwise to compiy with the term of the Construction Contract.
l4.40wner Defaul& Failure ofthe Owner, which hm not been remedied or waived, to pay the Contractor as
required under the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or comply with the other material
terms of the Construction Contract.
14.5. Contract Documents: AII the documents that comprise the agreement between the Owner and Contractor.
15. Ifthis Bond is issued for an agreement between a Contractor and subcontractor, the term Contractor in this
Bond shall be deemed to be Subcontractor and the term Owner shall be deemed to be Contractor.
Mnted in @oryrstion with the Amerian itrI|stifrite of Archihcts 6IN by Chubb. Thc lanSuage in thb drcament conforms to the lqnguage Lted in
AlADoalrnent A3t2 - 2OlO.
Form I5{2OSI3.FED (R6r. lUtO 3
16 MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLOWS:
(Space is provided below for additional signatures ofadded panies, other than those appearing on the cover page.)
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL SURETY
Company: Gor@rateseal) Company: {hrwrate Seal)
Federal Insurance ComPanY
Signature:
Name and Title:
Address:
Name and Title:
Address:
Hinted in cooryationsith the Ameicdn tnstitute of Architects (AIA) W Chubb. The language inthis docllient confonns to the l4ngudge used in
AIA Do{i.rnent A3r2n - 2O1O.
FmD lSO2-0573 FED(B!V. u/16) 4
EHLIEIE!
AIA Document A3l2rir - 2OlO Payment Bond
Surety
2O2B Halls Mill Road, PO Box 1650
whitehouse Station, NJ 08889-1650
Federal Insurance Company
O + 908.903.3485
F + 908.903.3656
Bond No. 82041232
Any singular reference to Contractor, Surety, owner or other party shall be considered plural where applicable,
COMRACTORS AS PRINCIPAL
Company:
The Ewing Company, lnc.
Signature:
NameandTitle' ,$1,l A" En,
BOND
Date (Not earlier than Construction Contract
Datd, MaY 12,2017
Amount: $9,729,000.00 Nine Million Seven Hundred Twenty Nine Thousand Dollars and 00/100
Modifications to this Bond: E None 1 Seepage4
SURETY
Company:
Federal Insurance Company
Signature:
Attomev-in-Fact Nam
Seal)
J
/t*rr
Sigred and Sealed this 12lh day of MaY' 2017
(Any additional signdtures appear on the ldst page of this Performance Bond.)
(FOR INFOR]I4{TION ONLY - Name, Address and Telephone)
AGENT or BROKER:
Paynewest Insurance, lnc.
960 Broadway Avenue, Suite 100
Boise, lD 83706
208-424-2900
OWNER'S REPRESEI{TATIVE (Ardlitd, Engineer or other party)
printedin @perationviththeAmericonInstirutefArchitec9(AIA)by Chubb.Thelanguagein thisdor'tmen confonLs to the langud,ge used in NA
Doflnatt A312x - 2O1O.
Form r5o2osa.FED G.v. lUl6)t'
CoI.ITRACTOR SURETY
(Name, legal status and address): (Name, legal status and pincipal place of business):
The Ewing Company, lnc- Federal Insurance Company
'1500 Eldorado, Suite 4 2028 Halls Mill Hoad, PO. Box 1650
Boise, lD 83704 Whitohouse Station, NJ 08889-1650
OWNER
(Nane,legal status antl aildress):
City ot Meridian
33 East Broadway Ave.
Meridian, lD 83642
CONS'IRUC"TION COT.ITRACT
Dare: April 25,2017
Amount: $9,729,000.00 Nine Million Seven Hundred Twenty Nine Thousand Dollars and 00/100
Description (Nam e and lncation)t Meridian WRRF Headworks Capacity Expansion
(Corporate Seol)
x
I
L The Contractor and the Suety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns to the Owner to pay for labor, materials and equipment furnished for use in the
performance ofthe Construction Contract, whichis incorporated herein byreference, subjecttothe following
terms.
2 If the Contractor promptly makes payment of all sums due to Claimants, and defends, indemnifies and holds
harmless the owner from claims, demands, liens or suits by any person or entity seeking payment for labor,
materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance of the Construction Contract, then the Surety
and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond.
& Ifthere is no Owner Default under the Construction Contract, the Surety's obligation to the owner under this
Bond shall arise after the Owner has promptly notified the Contractor and the Surety (at the address described in
Section 13) ofclaims, demands, liens or suits against the Owner or the Owner's property by any person or entity
seeking payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance of the Construction
Contract and tendered defense ofsuch claims, demands, liens or suits to the Contractor and the Suety.
4 When the Owner has satisfied the conditions in Section 3, the Suretyshall promptlyandat the Surety's expense
defend, indemniff and hold harmless the owner against a duly tendered claim, demand, lien or suit.
5, The Surety's obligations to a claimant under this Bond shall arise after the following:
5.1 Claimants, who do not have a direct contract with the Contractor,
,1 have furnished a written notice of non-payment to the Contractor, stating with substantial accuracy the
amount claimed and the name of the party to whom the materials were, or equipment was, furnished or
supplied or for whom the labor was done or performed, within ninety (9o) days after having last performed
labor or last furnished materials or equipment included in the Claim; and
.2 have sent a Claim to the Surety (at the address described in Section 13).
52 Claimants, who are employed by or have a direct contract with the Contractor, have sent a Claim to the Surety
(at the address described in Section 13).
6 Ifa notice ofnon-payment required by Section 5.1.1 is given by the Owner to the Contractor, that is suflicient
to satisfy a Claimant's obligation to furnish a written notice of non-payment under Section 5.1.1.
?, When a Claimant has satisfied the conditions of Sections 5.1 or 5.2, whichever is applicable, the Surety shall
promptly and at the Surety's expense take the followingactions:
7J Send an answer to the Claimant, with a copy to the owner, within sixty (60) days after receipt of the Claim,
stating the amounts that are undisputed and the basis for challenging any amounts that are disputed; and
72 Pay or arrange for payment of any undisputed amounts,
73 The Suety's failure to discharge its obligations under Section 7.1 or Section 7.2 shall not be deemed to constitute
a waiver of deferses the Surety or Contractor may have or acquAe as to a Claim, except as to undisputed
amounts for which the Surety and Claimant have reached agreement. If, however, the Surety fails to discharge
its obligations under Section 7.1 or Section 7.2, the Surety shall indemniff the Claimant for the reasonable
attorney's fees the Ciaimant incurs thereafter to recover any sums found to be due and owing theClaimant.
& The Suety's total obligation shall not exceed the amount ofthis Bond, plus the amount ofreasonable attomey's
fees provided under Section7.3, and the amountofthis Bond shallbe creditedfor any payments made in good
faith by the Surety.
9, Amounts owed by the Owner to the Contractor under the Construction Contract shall be used for the
performance ofthe Construction Contract and to satisfy claims, ifany, under any construction performance
bond. By the Contractor furnishing and the Owner accepting this Bond, they agxee that all funds earned by
the Contractor in the performance ofthe Construction Contract are dedicated to satisry obligations of the
Contractor and the Surety under this Bond, subject to the Owner's priority to use the ft.mds for the completion
ofthe work.
printed ii c@perotion vith the American Institute olArchltecls (NA)by Chubb. mel/,nguqgeinthisdoarme conforms to he langnge uscd in
AIA Dofltmant Nlztu - 2O1O,
Form ltu2ot+rED G.v. nIO 2
tro, The Surety shall nor be liable to the owner, Claimans or others for obligations of the Contractor that are
unrelatedto the Construction Contract. The Ownershall notbe liablefor the payment ofany costs or expenses
ofany Claimant under this Bond, and shall have under this Bond no obligations to make payments to, or give
notice on behalfof, Claimants or otherwise have any obligations to Claimants under this Bond.
lL The Surety hereby waives notice ofany change, including changes oftime, to the Construction Contract or to
related subcontracts, purchase orders and other obligations.
12 No suit or action shall be commenced by a Claimant under this Bond other than in a court of competent
jurisdiction in the state in which the project that is subject ofthe Construction Contract is located or after
the expiration of one year from the date (1) on which the Claimant sent a Claim to the Surety pursuant to
Section 5,1.2 or 5.2, or (2) on which the last labor or service was performed by anyone or the last materials or
equipment were fumished by anyone under the Construction Contract, whichever of(l) or (2) Iirst occurs. If
the provisions of this Paragraph are void or prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to
sureties as a defense in thejurisdiction of the suit shall be applicable,
B. Notice and Claims to the Suety, the Owner or the Contractor shall be mailed or delivered to the address shown
on the page which thet signature appears. Actua] receipt of notice or Claims, however accomplished, shall
be sullicient compliance as ofthe datereceived.
l,t When this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory or other legal requirement in the location
where the construction was to be perfbrmed, any provision in this Bond conflicting with said statutory or
legal requirement shall be deemed deleted herefrom and provisions conforming to such statutory or other
legal requirement shall be deemed incorporated herein. When so fumished, the intent is that this Bond shall
be construed as a statutory bond and not as a common Iaw bond.
L1 Upon request by any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneficiary ofthis Bond, the Contractor and
Owner shall promptly furnish a copy of this Bond or shall permit a copy to be made.
16" DEFINITIONS
I6.f Claim. A written statement by the Claimant including at aminimum:
.1 the name of the Claimant;
.2 the name of the person for whom the labor was done, or materials or equipment furnished;
.3 a copy of the a$eement or purchase order pursuant to which labor, materials or equipment was furnished
for use in the performance ofthe Construction Contract;
.4a brief description ofthe labor, materials or equipment furnished;
.sthe date onwhich the Claimant last performed labor orlast furnished materials or equipment for use in the
performance of the Construction Contract;
.6rhe total amount earned by the Claimant for labor, materials or equipment furnished as of the date of the
Claim;
.7 the total amount ofprevious payments received by the Claimanu and,
.Sthe total amount due and unpaid to the Claimant for hbor, materials or equipmetrt frrnished as of the date
of the Claim.
16,2 Claimane An individual or entity having a dtect contract with the Contactor or with a subcontractor of t}le
Contractor to furnish labor, materials, or equipment for use in the performance ofthe Construction Contract.
Theterm Claimant also includes anyindividual orentitythat has rightfully asserted a claimunderan applicable
mechanic's lien or similar statute against the real property upon which the Project is located. The intent of
this Bond shall be to include without limitation in the terms "labor, materials or equipment" that part of
water, gas power, light, heat, oil gasoline, telephone service or rental equipment used in the Construction
Contract, architectural and engineering services required for performance of the work of the Contractor
printed in cooperation lr,ith the American lnstllute of Architects (NN W Chubb, me hngudge h thb docllment @nfonns to the langtuge used in
3
AIADocummt A312nt - 2OlO,
Form r5020'ta.PED G6r. 11116)
and the Contractor's subcontractors, and all other items for which a mechanic's lien may be asserted in the
jurisdiction where the labor, materials or equipment were fumished.
I63Construction Contract: The agteement between the Owner and the Contractor identified on the cover
page, includingall Contract Documens and all changes made to the agreementand the Contract Documents.
164owner Default! Failure ofthe Owner, which has neither been remedied nor waived, to pay the Contractor
as required under the Construction Contract or to perform and complete or comply with the other material
terms of the Construction Contract.
165 Contract Documents. All the documents that comprise the agreement between the Owner and Contractor.
17. If this Bond is issued for an agreement between a Contractor and subcontractor, t}le term Contrador in this
Bond shall be deemed to be Subcontractor and the term Owner shall be deemed to be Contractor.
Ig MODIFICATIONS TO THIS BOND ARE AS FOLLOWS:
18I "Claim notices for FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPAMmustbe sent to the followingaddress: Chubb, POBox2l9l,
Chesapeake, Vtginia 332 Attention: Surety SupportTeam."
(Space is provided below for additional signatures ofadded parties, other than those appearing on the cover page.)
CONTRACTOR AS PRINCIPAL
Company:(Corporate Seal)
SURETY
Company:
Federal Insurance Company
Signature:Signature:
Name and Title:
Address:
Name and Title:
Address:
Printed in cooperationvith the Ameican lnstirute oJArchitects (AIA)b! Chubb, me bnguage lnthis doatment conforns to the language used in
4
AU Docufient 4312n- 2O1O.
Fo.m ltu2Ot.l.FED Gev. U/16)
(Corporate Seal)
EHIJElEI'
Power of Attorney
Federal Insurance Company I Vigilant lnsurance Company I Pacilic Indemnity Company
fnow All by Th.s. Pr.scnts, Th.t FEDEI|AI INSU]IANCE COMPA!{Y, an lndl.n. corpor:do& VIGIL ilf IISUR^NCE COMPAI{y, a l{.w York corporadorr 2nd PACltlC
INDEMNITY CoMPANY, a wisconsin corpoBtion, do.ach h.Eby constltute and.ppolnt Brenda J. Smith
amending or akedng the satne, and consents to thc modlficadon or eltaaadon of any lnatrumant tcfercd to ln aald bondJ or obllgadons.
Surcry Bond Numb.c 82041232
Obliglcr ( ily,rf Mundran
Ir Wrre$ Wt.r.or, ield F8DERAL Il.lSUMl{CE COMPANY, UclL4flt ,flSURltrCE COMPAT{y, ,nd ?ACIFIC IflDEUt{fi CoMPlNy tae. .t.fi .x€.!r.d ,nd ttteiLd t l'.
prcslnts and iflL.d thelr corporate s€als on thk 5n day of ,3ru.ry, 2017.
Surrrr.-Vn.Q}ltorcf $t:,*n#..t-,
Dawn M. Chloros, Assbtanr S€cretiry
llotarlal Se6l
Stephen il, Han y, Vlc. Pr6ident
'IATE
OP NEW
'8RSEYCountyofHont rdm ss
On thls 6it d.y ot ,aruary, 2017 before me, a Not ry Publl. of I{.w r.rsrr, peBonaily c.m6 Da$n M. Chlorcs, lo m. knonn to b6 Asslrtrnt Secletary of FEDERAL Ii6URANCE
COMPANY, VlGlLlttT INSURA CECOMPA y, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPAltlY, tha companl.a whldr daqrtad tha foIlgoln8 Pou.r ofAtlomcy,.nd lhe s:Id Dawn M. Chlorcr,
bclDS by me duly 5wor4 dld depose aod say tha! she 15 Assl$lant Secre!.ry of FEDERAL !!{SURAXCE COMPANY, VlGltiN" INSURAI{CB COMPANY, and PACmC IIDEMNITY
CoMP t{Y .od tnows the corpora@ seals ther€ot ahat th. seak amx.d lo rhe forcgolng Power of Attormy .lE such cor?orat. se.ls ind werc thercto affxed by autborlty of srld
th..elo rubrcrlbad by authorlty ofsald ComFnlea and h depoo€DCr pr.srnae-
rqn€R${E J. tDEUln
ItlOl iY An[r OF litw IttEY
No 23165c46a.b Erd... .t y ld zott
CERTIFICATIOTI
Resolurlonr adopted by rh! Bo.rds ofDl.ectors of FEDEnAL IiISURANCE COMPANY, VIGlUlllT INSURAHCE COMPANY, snd P CIFIC INDEMNITY COMPAT{Y onAugusl30,2016:
.nt rtd lnto h u.ordln ry.ouncof hrln.$ (.ad.'wri[t.n Com! E .!l):
r.1 or$. Comp.n, o, ottcrwlrc,
todr.rLntth.lrudl.cltonlr 6o{rr!d b, dxtnnrolpostnFovldd fo.h $A p!6ot*w'lEar.ppol nr.ltrtrat&!otn}lr.A.t
C3) Erct ol tt|. clt.llml! tlt. ktd&n!. 1 th. vle hd.ltr .l dr.comp.nrbncftty.unora4torftdon b.ldfolti.ComF.rao.ppolnilnprLh! ary p.rsoo h. .llomr]h.
E r o{ li! co6py di fd F !r :nd st}orlty b .,.eta (o! .rd o. t Mo(th CorFly, !Ed.r t!. ..dl otri. Cdry.a, c or}.rita, rtrdl $t{l.r Ce{eD.rn o{ th.
Conp.ny.r !D.y t ?.df.d ln.ed t9rtia A9ohfi.il wild rp.ciftetlon n , t ltt.itrC Bp. ord.t! ot $tiom &rlnttraB or btt dndd of R G Bn p.rtklLr
Wdntn Commlr'cnn
(a) E .i ol6. CrdlE 4 th. PrBtd... .id tL. Vlc. Hd.!!r o, 6. ConFn), b i.r*y.u6orts 4to!.rdont 5.lror6.Co!t ry,todd€t larE!tlor!yo.h.!o,nc.ol$.
C.Dp.ry tt. n$oritrto.aortq, fo. md on b.hlt o, &! Cohp.rr, @d,r lh! CorFn)/r ...t or orl|.tdrc $d lltltt o conmlor.llB 01li. CoEp.ny.r r sFmcd h nlcn
,rld& ddqrdou rr,6 p.dfadB rrr b. U, !a...1 ryF q d.! o{ lYrit 6 Coclk'atr c t, ?.dBtlon otdor r rtFrO.rtl.!!,tl!5lctrid8at.nti
(, Ih dSrdrtdqea..E?Fr3.r te.st&Aqhtli.a ColrEltctq.:rrnffi ordd.tee F.@t|o irrr R.r&, !d t!.r.d dtiacorw,, nryt lffri!!,
fdld!. oi nrdr Wrltt o CoE ttElmtcsrltt !.probt!.rt or d.|.8.lloll
C4nD.!r. rld !l.l R.$htlon .tdt !.tBolt.rorh..e!r !tr ra ri..rxdr. o(.ry $.h !o*.ror &dt dty d.B,G. v.[.tt!r,!r.d 6rri.4'
c.rdry thal
(l) the forcgoloS Resolutlons adopt€d by the Board ol Dlrecto6 ol the Companles sre tnre, coEect and ln full forco end €ftecq
0l) th. Conpanles ir. aluly llcensed .nd .uthorlz.d to Eoi.ct 3u!.!y bu3ln.ss ln all 50 of th. Unlted St tes of Am.rlc. rnd th. Dkd.t of Columbh .nd arc
ruthorlz.d by the US. lrer$ry Dep.rtma& funh.c F.dar.l and Vlgllant ..€ llenr.d ln the U.5, Vl8ln klaldr .nd Fld.rel ls lL.ns.d ln cuanl Pu.no Rl.o,
and a.ch of tha Prodrc!, of Canada !e.pt Prlnc6 Edwa.d ld.nd; and
0ll) th6 forc8o,og Powlr ofAttomey ls Eue, correq.ld h rull ,orcc.nd.rf.ct
Olwn und.r my hard and s.rls ofsatd Compa[I.3 alYvhttlhoure Slatlor, NJ, thls May 12,2017
Doul=\n. A$]om(
Dawn M. Chioros,jrjGb
VENFYTHE
903.3a93
OF Tllls EOND 0B Nolltl I,s 0t AllY OItlE IIATTER PLEATE COm Cr USATII Tl{E EVEm YOU wls fl fO NOttFY
903-3696
@@@ @@@
Fom t5tcoz2sa-U GEfl CONSE}IT (r8v. 12n6)
PublicWorks Search
.{ Print
Page 1 ol I
Company License Work l,icense License
Name Number Cateeorv Tvoe Class
StaIus A!!licanl ( xr ner CumDan\ (i,nrnrn-\ ('ompan\ Comoan! -. l'\piralion
\.rinc \rme Addre.s !q srcc.- 4!;a;; t'h)n( D;(
Parent
License
Number
r2003
00001
00002
o@03
12.3.5 uruurreo ecrrve l[ E[no I500 BOISE ]D 83704
(208)
3n
150o
78112011
https://web.dbs.idaho.gov/etrakit3/Custom,ildaho PublicWorksPrint.aspx 4t412017
Detailed sratemen. o. *",.,,,"""]lf ::r::lfrI" - Rev and Exp Reporr
3590 - Hli ConatrucUj,on Projecta
50 - Enterplile Eund
Fxorn 70/7/2016 Through 9/30/201?
Ker th
96164
10044
10044.d
Budget with
Amendment s
Curlent Year
Actual
Budget
Renaining
Pelcent of
Budget
Remaininq
6,339,023.66
107,458.50
344 .12
70?,458.50
6, 338, 638.94
0 .00
99. 99r
0.00r
Capital Outl-ay
Lleadworks Improvements
Headworks/aine Screens
WRRE Eeadworks Capacity
ExpansioD - Design
WRRF Grit Removal
Equipnent for the
Headr"ro!ks Expansion Proj
10044.c
10601.H
82,0?3.00
0, 00
82, 073. 00
292,984 .00
0.00
1292,980.A0)
0.00*
!{RRF Cap. Exp. Process
Cont!ol Software
Integration
Total Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
'7 128 555.16 1,482,896.22 6,04s,558.94
'7 , 128 ,555 -76 1 082 896.22 ___9.,_9!2.,_923-2-4 84 .81*
84.81E
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: Mav 23,2017
ITEM TITLE:
ITEM NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
Police: Intergovernmental Memorandum of Understanding of use of Meridian Police
Department Canine Holding Facility between City of Meridian and Bureau of Land
Management
MEETING NOTES
u✓ A PPROIED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
Any party may change its respective address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving
written notice of such change in the manner herein provided.
Q. Approval required. This MOU shall not become effective until approved by the respective
governing bodies of both the City of Meridian and Guest.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this MOU to be executed by their duly
authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written.
GUEST: ciy - AAI
Signature:
Print name: y Z'R"/ -i1
Title: C 1'S lts� jT1, cSy�.erVj or p. -
Date; !J 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN:
BY:
Tammy de Weed ayor
Attest: J </
C. Yany ColesCtity Clerk
MOU WITH GUEST AGENCY FOR USE OF MPD CANINE FACILITY PAGE 6 OF 6
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 11 A
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2016-0055
ITEM TITLE: Bancroft Square MDA 1-7— /7L
Ordinance No.: An Urdinance (BancroTT square MDA H -2U- or me He -Lone o
a Portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 21, Township 3 North,
Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; Establishing and
Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification From R-4 (Medium Low Density
Residential) to R-8 (Medium Low Density Residential) Zoning Districts in the Meridian City
Code; Providing that Copies of this Ordinance shall be Filed with the Ada County
Assessor, The Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required
by Law; and Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and providing for a waiver of
the rPnrlinn n dt-g- nnri Prnvirlinn nn FffPrtivP r)ntP
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-046808
BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 VICTORIA BAILEY 05/25/2017 11:59 AM
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. — T.) b
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER,
MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS
AN ORDINANCE (H-2016-0055 — BANCROFT SQUARE) FOR THE RE -ZONE OF A
PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST/40F THE SOUTHWEST'/ OF SECTION 21,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN,
ADA COUNTY IDAHO; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-4 (MEDIUM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO R-8 (MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING
DISTRICTS IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE
ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS
REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE
ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO:
SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description
herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" is within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian.,
Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for re -zoning by the owner of said
property, to -wit: Reginald Jones and Jack Stolfo.
SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby re -zoned fiom the R-4
(Medium Low Density Residential) to R-8(Medium Low Density Residential) zoning districts, in the
Meridian City Code.
SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the
Ordinances of the City of Meridian zone said property.
SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the
laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to re -zone said property.
SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well
as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of
the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance.
SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or pans thereof in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled.
RE ZONE ORDINANCE — BANCROFT SQUARE RZ H-2016-0055 PAGE 1 OF 3
SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication, according to law.
SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the
effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a
draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of
Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file
simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State
of Idaho.
SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the
Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading
in fitll be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full
force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
day of /'16*/ , 2017.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
day of /l �1 �� 92017.
MAYOR de WEERD
ATTEST:
�P, IAIVAUC�S
'q0 T
�GG� 7 r
C.J Y COLWS, S, CITY CLERK City of
E �IDIAN
IF) Ali 0
SEAL
REZONE ORDINANCE— BANCROFT SQUARE RZ H-2016-0055 PAGE 2 OF 3
STATE OF IDAHO, )
ss:
County of Ada )
On this day of ! , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for said State, personally appeared ItAMMY de WEERD and C.JAY COLES, known to me to be
the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within
instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year first above written.
Notary Publicf aho
Residing At:
My Commission Expires: 3 - -,a0ag.
RE ZONE ORDINANCE - BANCROFT SQUARE RZ H-2016-0055 PAGE 3 OF 3
EXHIBIT A
May 4, 2016
Rezone Description
From Existing R-4 To Proposed R-8
For
PROPOSED BANCROFT SQUARE SUBDIVISION
A portion of the Northwest 114 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 21, Township 3
North, Range I East, Boise Meridian, City of Meddian, Ada County, Idaho being more
particularly described as follows.
COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of said Section 21 from which the
West 114 comer of said Section 21 bears North 00*0U01" West, 2700,15 feiat:
Thence along the West boundary line of said Section 21 North 00*00'Ul" West,
1350,12 feet to the South Ili 6 corner of said Section 21 and Section 20, Township 3
North, Range I East, Boise Meridian, City of Wrldlan, Ada County, Idaho, being the
REAL POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing along said West boundary line North 00'00'01" West,
280,82 feet to the Intersection With the centerline of East Easy Jet Drive-.
Thence leaving said West boundafy fine and along said centerline South
80*07146' E ast, 1,029.38 feet 10 the intersection with the centerline of South Nephrite
Way;;
Thence leaVing the centerline of said East Easy Jet Drive and along the
centerfine or said Ew Nephrite Way South 00'51'26" West 154.10 feet;
Thence 190,14 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of
300-00 feet, a central angle of 19'07'31", and a long chord which bears South
1092512" Westa distance of 99.68 feet',
Thence South 19"68'68" West, 25.743 feet to the Intertection with the South
boundary line of the Northwest 114 of the Southwest 114 of said Section 21;
Thence leaving said centerline and along said South boundary line North
89°21'39" West, 1,000.18 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an
area of 6-54 acres, more or less.
Bancroft Square - MDA H-2016-0055
EXHIBIT B
Bancroft Square - MDA H-2016-005
NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A)
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17- a D
PROVIDING FOR RE ZONING ORDINANCE
An Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting re -zoning of a portion of the Northwest '/a of
the Southwest '/4 of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,
Ada County. This parcel contains 6.54 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is SUBJECT TO all
easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. As in attached exhibit `B" and is not based on an
actual field survey. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of
Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the
day of �SUNe , 2017.� �
City of
yof dian rte"1/,Ll li,i
t
Da,1(11
Mayor and City Council \\<:
By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk r,
First Reading:
Adopted after first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code 50-902:
YES- NO
Second Reading:
Third Reading: --�
STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE NO. l 17- l7 2
The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby
certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance
No, 17- / -7 a � of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete
and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3).
DATED this a' L day of /14 y , 2017.
William. L.M. Na
City Attorney
RE ZONE ORDINANCE SUMMARY- BANCROFT SQUARE — RZ H-2016-0055 PAGE 1
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: May 23,2017
ITEM NUMBER: 11 B
PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0010
ITEM TITLE: Oaks South /7-17
Uralnance No.: An Uralnance paKS JOUM - H -1U I /-uu I u) I -or Tne Ke -Lone or rarcels OT
Land Situated in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise
Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land
Use Zoning Classification From L -O (Limited Office) to R-8(Medium Density
Residential) (0.005 acres); L -O (Limited Office) to R-15 (Medium -High Density
Residential) (0.001 acres); R-15 (Medium -High Density Residential) to L -O (Limited
Office) (0.04); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Density
Residential) (0.22 acres); R-15 (Medium -High Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium Low
r)r-neity Pteidt-ntin1) (0 19) • R -R (hAt-ri i im Dp-ncit\i RpgiriPntinII to R-4 fMP. Iii im I nw nansity _
MEETING NOTES
Ff APPROVED
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-046809
BOISE IDAHO Pgs=17 VICTORIA BAILEY 05/25/2017 12:01 PM
CITY OF MERIDIAN. IDAHO NO FEE
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. /7—
BY—
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER,
MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS
AN ORDINANCE (H-2017-0010 — OAKS SOUTH) FOR THE RE -ZONE OF PARCELS OF
LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST % OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,
RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY IDAHO;
ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM L -O (LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT) TO R-8 (MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL)(0.005 ACRE); FROM L -O (LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT) TO R-15
(MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)(0.001 ACRE); FROM R-15 (MEDIUM-HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO L -O (LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT)(0.04); FROM R-15
(MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL) TO R-8 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)(0.22
ACRE); AND FROM R-15 (MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-4 (MEDIUM
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)(0.19); FROM R-8 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
TO R-4 (MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) (0.31 ACRE); AND FROM R-4
(MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-8 (MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) (0.07 ACRE) ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE;
PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA
COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX
COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF
THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO:
SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description
herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" is within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian,
Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for re -zoning by the owner of said
property, to -wit: Thomas Coleman, New Oafs, LLC.
SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby re -zoned from the L -O (Limited
Office) to R-8(Medium Density Residential)(0.005 acres); L -O (Limited Office) to R-15 (Medium -High
Density Residential)(0.001 acres); R-15 (Medium -High Density Residential) to L -O (Limited
Office)(0.04); R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(0.22
acres); R-15 (Medium -High Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential)(0.19); R-8
(Medium Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential)(0.31); and R-4 (Medium Low
Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(0.07)zoning districts, in the Meridian City
Code.
RE ZONE ORDINANCE — OAKS SOUTH - RZ H-2017-0010 PAGE 1 OF 3
SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the
Ordinances of the City of Meridian zone said property.
SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the
laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to re -zone said property.
SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as
the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the bo-undaries and the zoning districts of the
City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance.
SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled.
SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication, according to law.
SECTION S. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the
effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a
draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of
Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file
simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State
of Idaho.
SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the
Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in
full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force
and effect upon its passage, approval and publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
day of/'N ,2017.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ' -3 day
of p 4y , 2017.
A
C.JA
� _siVD,atac� F
1�C,
City of
E I1 IAN*
1CfAHp
��. z
F ?f leeTg k�v
YOR TAIIY de
RE ZONE ORDINANCE — OAKS SOUTH — RZ H-2017-0010 PAGE 2 OF 3
STATE OF IDAHO, )
ss:
County of Ada )
rd
On this day of MQ' , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY de WEERD and C.JAY COLES, known to me to be
the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within
instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and
year first above written.
yLY T °•
(SEAe.���� p�,RLL���''•.
' O �' •
OjAym �Jaj-,'
Notary Public for Idaho
Residing At:
My Commission Expires:},
RE ZONE ORDINANCE - OAKS SOUTH - RZ H-2017-0010 PAGE 3 OF 3
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions for Rezone Boundaries
TTIK a...
('J.U-B I U $3 0mp'NNIES i -.0 �)M
J.UIa ENGINEERS, INC.
The Oaks South Subdivision
Limited Office (L-0) Rezone
goundary Description
Project Number 10-26-114 February 7, 2017
A parcel of land situated In the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range I
West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada CourAW Idaho and more particularly described as follows. -
Commencing at a Brass Cap marking the northwest corner of Section 33, from which a Brass Cap marking the
North 1/4 corner of Section 33 beats, South 89'1V5V Last, 2635.34 feet,
Thence ailong the north boundary of Section 33, South 99*16'50" East, 1,118.69 feet;
Thence South 00°43'10" West, 488.98 feet;
Thence South 08*2738" West, 48.48 feet,
Thence 17.82 feet westerly along the are of a non -tangent curve to the right having a radius of 400.00 feet, a
central angle of 02"33'07", and a long chord which bears North 83'12'06" West 17.81 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING,
Thence continuing along said curve, 17.40 feet westerly aloog the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of
400.00 feet, a central arighe of02*29'3W, and a long chord which bears North 80'40'47" West 1739 feet,
Thence North 7926'O2" West, 134.82 feet;
Thence 87,44 feet westerly along the are of a curve to left having a radius of 500.00 feet a central angle of
IWOMV', and a longthord which bears North 8gV26*38" West 87,33 feet;
Thence South 89*27'21" East, 75.14 feet,
Thence 165:48 feet easterly along the am of a non -tangent curve to the eight having a radius of 400.00 feet, a
central angle of 2342'le, and a long chord which bears South 7713WIS" East 1%31 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Said parcel contains 1,572 square feet or 0.04 acres, more or 1#4s.
End of Description,
Page I of I
it 250 SOUTH Seechwoo;l Avenue, Suite 201. Boise; tD 83709 p 208316-7330 C 208-323.9336 w www.1u6.com
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions for Rezone Boundaries
CJY
:B )b
1 U-13 COP41PA141ES LAN"O"
VROV,
Ulm M 1
J1111111 EHOINKER56 INC.
The Oaks South Subdivision
Medium -Low Density Residential (114) Rezone
Boundary Description
Project Number 10-16-114 February 7, 2017
Parcel't
A parcel of land situated, In the ,Northwest ,1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range I West of the
Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows*
Commencing ate Brass Cap marking the northwest comer of said Section 33;
Thence South 84*16'59'5a5t, 2635.34 feet to a Brass Cap marking the North 114 corner of Section 33,
Thence South 3rwos West, 875.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,
Thence North 89*1WWWest100.43 feet;
Thence North =43'02" East, 42.21 feet;
Thence North 59"33'16" East, 1.31 feet-,
Thence North 14'33*16" East, $4.95 leet;
Thence North 51*23'45" East, 2540 feet;
Thence 51.59 feet southeastartV along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right having a radius of
150.00 feet, a central angle of 19*42'27", and a long chord which bears South 28045'OV East, $1.34 feet;
Thence South 18*53148' East, 102,47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said parcel contains 9,073 square feet or 0.21 acres, more or less.
Page 1 of'4
a 250 SOUTH, 8eeChV.'0qdAV4qtM, Suite 2 108-3#6-7330 L 2t i-323-9336 tv, www4ubcom
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions for Rezone Boundaries
IUBUMPAN11751 fft"11410"
i im
J*U-D ENGINEERS, INC.
Thence South 75,*35'33" West, 44,23 feet;
Thence South 58'0655" West, 56.81 feet,
Thence South 58107'15" West, 32.21 feet;
Thence North 31753'05" West, 39-34 feet;
Thence South 70*59'59" West, 46.32 feet;
Thence South 06'1521" West, 128.22 feet;
Thence North 21*04'20" West, 150.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said parcel contains 11,263 square feet or 0.26 acres, more or less,
Parcel �
A parcel of land situated in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range I West
of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as
follows,
Commencing at a Brass Cap marking the northwest corner of said Section 33 from which a Brass
Cap marking the North 1/4 comer of Section 33 bears South 89'i6'50" East, 2635,34 feet;
Thence along the north boundary of Section 30, South 89'16'50" East, 1,118.69 feet,
Thence leaving said north boundary South 00'020" West, 488.98 feet,
Thence South 0802738" West, 73.56 feet,
Page 3 of 4
a 2SOSOUTH Seechwood Avenue, Suite 201.92!je,,10 83709 p 208-3764330 C 208-323-9�36 Tv wwVJW-Ccm
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions for Rezone Boundaries
CJU-B'� I U 5 COMVAMI�i
II4-U-0 r"6WrrQ% Mc.
Thence South 2r04'20" East, 288,30 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence South 06*22'09" West, 230.18 feet;
Thence South 09*28'49" West, 178.23 feet;
Thence North 07*43'36" East, 408-26 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said parcel contains 1,113 square feet or 0.03 acres, more or less.
End of Destription,
morm-
rd
Page 4 of 4
a M SOUr1i Seethwood Avonue, Suite 201, tloiLt, IV 83709 k! 20!W76.7334; wOtt vubxcm
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions for Rezone Boundaries
fJ-U-B J Lt B COMPANIESoaN
7-=--`
J -U-13 LUGINVEOS, 1141,11.
The Oaks South Subdivision
Medium Density Residential (R-8) Rezone
Boundary Descriptions
Project Number 10-16-114 February 6, 2017
PU�C—el 1
A parcel of land situated in the Northeast 114 of the Northwest 114 of Section 33, Township 4
North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and 'more
particularly described as follows -
Commencing at a grass Cap marking the northwest comer of said Section 33;
Thence South 89*16'50" East, 2635.34 feet to a Brass Cap marking the North 1/4 corner of
Section 33;
Thence South 26*38'09" West, 777.68 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence 171.46 feet westerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of
1,175.00 feet, a central angle of 08*21'40", and a long chord which bears South 75*20'44" West,
171.31 feet;
Thence North 1853'48" West, 42. 17 feet;
Thence South 89*16'58" East, 121.20 feet;
Thence 58.51 feet Easterly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of
300.00 feet, a central angle of 11'10'29", and a long chord which bears North 85'07'47" East,
58.42 feet to the POINT OV BEGtNNING.
Said parcel contains 2,845 square feet or 0.07 acres, more or less.
Page I of 3
a 2so 5.8 echwuod Avenue, §vjte 202 Boisef -6 w www.jubx0m
j ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 �P$323-933
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions for Rezone Boundaries
fi-U-B j tj 11 COMP-AmrS, TUC
J.u.8 ENGINEERS, INC.
Parcel 2
A parcel of land situated in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4
North, Range I West of the Boise Meridian, Cityof Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a Brass Cap marking the northwest corner of said Section 43;
Thence South 89'16'50' East, 2635.34 feet to a Brass Cap marking the North 1/4 corner of
Section 33;
Thence South 43055'02" West, 9,05.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence South 00'43'02" West, 3.03 feet;
Thence South 59033'16" West, 13.1S feet,
Thence North 75*2644" West, 41.18 feet;
Thence South 89'16'58" East,, 51,20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING-
Said parcel contains 269 square feet or 0.01 acres, more or less.
Page 2 of 3
a 250S.3eechwoodAvenuLSulte20,1,,SWse,,,108BL09., p 208-376-?SIQ�j',208-323-11336 _ w www4ub,cpm
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions for Rezone Boundaries
,(J.U-B
71-7::�
J�U=SCOKOAWFS
. . .
*P#J-0 ENGINEERS. Mt.
Parcel 3
A parcel of land situated in the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4
North, Range I West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more
particularly described as follows-,
Commencing at a Brass Cap marking the northwest corner of said Section 33 from which a Brass
Cap marking the North 1/4 corner of Section 33 bears South 89*16'50" East, 2635.34 feet,•
Thence along the north boundary of Section 30, South 89*16'50" East, 1,118.69 feet;
Thence leaving said north boundary South 00'43'10" West, 481;3,98 feetto the POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence continuing, South 00*43'10" West, 57.63 feet;
Thence 170.65 feet southeasterly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right having a
radius of 400.00 feet, a central angle of 24*26'39", and a long chord which bears South
49641'31" East, 169,36 feet,
Thence South 68"55'46" West, 95.99 feet;
Thence North 21*04'20" West, 138.18 feet,
Thence North 08'27'38" East, 73.56 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said parcel contains 9,474 square feet or 0.22 acres, more or less.
End of Description.
Page 3 of 3
a 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, wise, it) 83749 g 208-376-733Q Z 209-323-9336 w vnYw-,jub.a)m
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions for Rezone Boundaries
fi-U-8J
V-3 COWAMES 0-0
11.11-11.130.
M
19i t1g"')
J�U-s ruGINCE*S. INC.
The Oaks South Subdivision
Medium -High Density Residential (RIS) Rezone
Boundary Description
Project Number 10-16-114 February 7, 2017
A parcel of land situated in the Northwest 114 of the Northwest 114 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range I
West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as folllowv
Commencing at a grass Cap marking the northwest corner of Section 33, from which a Brass Cap marking the
North 1/4 corner of Section 35 bears, South 89°16'SV' East, 2635.34 feet;
Thence along the north boundary of Section 33, South 99°16'S0"' East, 1,119-69 feet;
Thence South W43'10" West, 488,98 feet,
Thence South 09'27'38" West, 48A8 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing, South 08°27'38" West 6.00 feet,
Thence 18.63 feet northwesterly along the are of a non-tarigant curve to the lefthaving a radius of 400.00
feet, a central angle of 02*4009", and a long chord which bears North 64125'03" West 18.63 feet;
Thence 17.82 feet easterly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 400.00 feet, 4
central angle of 02'33'07", and a long chordi which bears South 93*12'06" East 17.81 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Said parcel contains 51 square feet or 0.00 acres, more or less.
Page I of I
a 2 7 SOUTM SCOCI)WOOd Avenue, Stifte 201, Soile, M $3709 a 3U$ -37f-13.10 C ZUB-323-9336 w www jubtett
EXHIBIT B
Exhibit Maps for Rezone Boundaries
EXHIBIT 8
Exhibit Maps for Rezone Boundaries
CJ -U -B
j'-TM11,A
J-U-BCOMPANIES &IIANIUMN 1
amavp wc�
J -U-9 ENUINKERS, INC.
pArgerg
A parcel of land situated In the Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range I West
of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at a Brass Cap marking the northwest comer of said Section 33 from which a Brass
Cap marking the North 1/4 corner of Section 33 bears South ST1615011 East, 2635.34 feet;
Thence along the north boundary of Sectlon 30, South 89'16'5v' East, 1,118.69 feet;
Thence leaving said north boundary South 00'43'10" West, 488.98 feet,
Thence South 08*2738" West, 73.56 feet;
Thence South 21904!20" East, 138.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence North 68'55'40" East, 121.02 feet,
Thence North 70003'09" East, 25.00 feet;
Thence 51.26 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius
of 500.00 feet, a central angle of 05'52'25", and a long chord which bears South 22053,04" East,
51.23 feet,
Thence South 25*49'16" East, 2.90 feet;
Thence North 71'3948" East, 82.59 feet,
'hence South 83'16'50'East, 565.00 feet;
Thence South 75026'44" East, 3.87 feet,
Thence North 89°16'58"'Nest, 553,80 feet;
Page 2 o(4
a 250 SOU rH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID $1709 fl 208-37fi-7330__X 208-19$-9336, w,www. 1vb.cam
EXHIBIT B
Exhibit Maps for Rezone Boundaries
29 2
3 33 a1lp�ss' vr_ MOWI€On Rood
Um
75om of $rsginnil�q
lxtdratl
Pol.t .1f $C�SAn1ng
Curve Lo N, i14d+ 4 D040 CtrarC tiea*t9g
Fard2t 3:
cdl 7,5p' S3'IrfkF` 19'42', 7`" S7043,01,t
51,44'
S.2 55.20' SGk3.lHl 552'ZS" Sx�53'ak"E
�
4r"
A
i-3
N,9A'1,3'1R'i} 1.31`
�u
:Sita"25`16`1 € 444'S
n
L6
59p'S3'48't €.dkY4��7'
0
': NCIMS4 -C 121Z2''
L3
r-llva3 on: `t 25.w
L6
Lt4
C2
_'-8,
mo, 16,581W 553 e
R-4
C lnb K
Curve Lo N, i14d+ 4 D040 CtrarC tiea*t9g
mrd iiarvsln
cdl 7,5p' S3'IrfkF` 19'42', 7`" S7043,01,t
51,44'
S.2 55.20' SGk3.lHl 552'ZS" Sx�53'ak"E
_ id.S3` _ .
of 1}r0illm%nr2:
ftmet t,
L
1;na ias+a
L:xe i �
i.R=n�x1[4+1 =� LcrglC&
L7
N89"10'5e8'VJl 10A. -Y:
i-3
N,9A'1,3'1R'i} 1.31`
>,#;
:Sita"25`16`1 € 444'S
L6
59p'S3'48't €.dkY4��7'
0
': NCIMS4 -C 121Z2''
L3
r-llva3 on: `t 25.w
L6
Lt4
is75'45'I¢WE 1, www
'at7P71V'llyt`L'j #2`-W
l/1
L12 _
'571"a".b'Ra'r 3v,
i57Y35'33V 0 2Y
113
S58'd+6'65'W woo.
L15
N31'SX05" W •,� 3924' I
Lids
017 M
t to
520rS9 S9'W 40.32'
SWJV7,Yv 124.22'
WA -04-20-11 tldO, I2'.
LIV
SwZ7'38-01 73.56`
EXHIBIT B
Exhibit Maps for Rezone Boundaries
29 78 W . i miller, f'dgd
:S?. 'AM:
"111779
'2 ta�47 + R..,.;..
Ciiil9 :$tial
aara �-a-rm;inn Urq,*
A[ng4r t I`iaaHl4
t3 S87tq 5�J'C t2i.2c3' `
u'Sl.*iE6+
{sxat"av/lF�
Lik4if}St S3[Cn—
q^.h..
lJ
t51$t.
1l3iTM�E
Ciiil9 :$tial
M✓�P �,
A[ng4r t I`iaaHl4
Cita
u'Sl.*iE6+
{sxat"av/lF�
Lik4if}St S3[Cn—
q^.h..
lJ
t51$t.
1l3iTM�E
2+'+'tDi']9'
7t@7
a!@.!fi`
CC3t
8a1@''
j 0'
10
Modkim
75 '28 tV, MO •illota P*qd j
2,1'5,441 28
3i ��u�•a"` 4178.64' _ ,,.__
SS
a+i
1 u Iri aB
o- P lama n;Pre
L-()
,heti L�NI?
q r
° 1 }779 �
R-8'
f
t R""4„ i
Car u 4
?�^AI� � 8v3i,kP
Cita
Cl rd 5H"e�:�
Cn;n.S tcngrl,
lJ
j?Q,cS`�+aav-i7p'
2+'+'tDi']9'
9sT&Y3t'E
a!@.!fi`
R-8'
f
t R""4„ i
EXHIBIT B
Exhibit Maps for Rezone Boundaries
29
23'
W. �.3cWton Road
r,anti`.�
kdrl�5rc Gann
cnbrFi 8�uctrSG wt5aril C4ngdh
�y.
_ v — 56,;3 i6 5WE 7635 3W
�CrGtYt" 2`+l9'
$
32
3
ap'3;�€t' �'3.}`4�'
S@3`t2'Q6`6 f7.t1S'
33
u Foo-:: aao
ao
"p
Sr�e wFt'cet
of
y<
R-8
1.. [
t,igE [1iF1'CtX�SF t+0.1M}iEi
i+}
nor
c�
tR Ll S7@`27'38'W 6.00'
Pains, of Elog3rning
C2
ci W
Curve
4
{...E}--..
LA
a
1 779 9
1 t�117
�a�' or �v
.—
The flaks South Subd cion
[ }
Medium High Density Residential (R-1 6) Rezone
K � :..
1.{od ski #hA Nt�liiltti98tii1ldi16t#t IINd N¢t1�t44Gt gU:itidt.
<-s ufaea4uFccat.«re.
WS{tdon,33,Township 4Nofttr,:FRanpoltlV"S 1114
�'
r,anti`.�
kdrl�5rc Gann
cnbrFi 8�uctrSG wt5aril C4ngdh
ct
B3tb5"
�CrGtYt" 2`+l9'
t�t;4'25'U3'Yt
r7tS2'
ap'3;�€t' �'3.}`4�'
S@3`t2'Q6`6 f7.t1S'
EXHIBIT B
Exhibit Maps for Rezone Boundaries
L—av—s> The Oaks South Subdivision
' r®
NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A)
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17- / ?
PROVIDING FOR RE ZONING ORDINANCE
An Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting re -zoning of a parcels of land situated in the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,
Ada County. These parcels contain 0.836 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is SUBJECT TO all
easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. As in attached exhibit `B" and is not based on an
actual field survey. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of
Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the
3 day of � upl f , 2017.
Cdty of McUdian
Mayor and City Council
By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk
�eON,
p;trB A uGtrs+ I c......
G0 c
City of
First Reading:
�
t� � � I�,11��1 AI�1, x
Adopted after first reading by suspension of the
YES_ NO
Second Reading;
Third Reading:
as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code 50-902:
STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEYAS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE NO. 17- I
The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby
certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance
No, J7' % f the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete
and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3).
DATED this 3'S day of /11q1 , 2017.
William. L.M. ary
City Attorney
RE ZONE ORDINANCE SUMMARY- OAKS SOUTH - RZ H-2017-0010 PAGE 1
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: Mav 23,2017 ITEM NUMBER: 12
ITEM TITLE:
Future Meeting Topics
PROJECT NUMBER:
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE:
E-MAILED TO
STAFF
SENT TO
AGENCY
SENT TO
APPLICANT
NOTES
INITIALS