Loading...
2017 05-181. 2. 3. 4. E IDIAN MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. Roll -call Attendance _X Treg Bernt _X_ Gregory Wilson X Jessica Perreault _X _X Steven Yearsley O Ryan Fitzgerald _X Bill Cassanelli Rhonda McCarvel — Chairperson Adoption of the Agenda Approve as Amended Consent Agenda Approved A. Approve Minutes of May 4, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Action Items A. Public Hearing for Bannock Ridge (H-2017-0050) by Two C Development, LLC Located 2940, 3101 & 3155 S. Mesa Way Public Hearing Continued to June 1, 2017 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 9.42 Acres of Land with an R-4 Zoning District 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Thirty - One (31) Building Lots and Six (6) Common Lots on 13.57 Acres of Land in the R-4 Zoning District B. Public Hearing for Meridian Meats (H-2017-0052) by Meridian Meat and Sausage, Inc. Located 119 E. Bower Street Public Hearing Continued to June 1, 2017 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda —Thursday May 18,2017 Pagel of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 1. Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval to Expand an Existing Nonconforming Use (Food Products Processing) for the Purpose of Constructing a 673 Square Foot Addition in the O -T Zoning District C. Public Hearing for Urban Air (H-2017-0046) by LimitLess Entertainment Boise, LLC Located 3820 & 3876 E. Lanark Street Approved — Prepare Findings of Fact for Approval for June 1, 2017 1. Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval to Operate an Indoor Recreation Facility in an I -L Zoning District D. Public Hearing for Franklin Daycare (H-2017-0047) by Donna Franklin Located 4657 N. Price Avenue Approved — Prepare Findings of Fact for Approval for June 1, 2017 1. Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval of a Daycare Group for up to Twelve (12) Children in an R-8 Zoning District E. Public Hearing for My First Steps Daycare (H-2017-0054) by Darya Krautsova Located 3545 S. Pompei Avenue Approved — Prepare Findings of Fact for Approval for June 1, 2017 1. Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval for a Group Daycare for up to Twelve (12) Children on 0.15 of an Acre in an R-8 Zoning District F. Public Hearing for Geddes Subdivision (H-2017-0041) by Schultz Development Located Southeast of the W. Ustick Road and N. Black Cat Road Intersection Recommend Approval to City Council with Modifications — Schedule for City Council June 20, 2017 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 2.08 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Ten (10) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 2.08 Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning District Adjourned at 7:08 p.m. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda —Thursday May 18,2017 Page 2 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian Planning and Zoning Meeting May 18, 2017. Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of May 18, 2017, was called to order at 6:08 p.m. by Chairman Rhonda McCarvel. Members Present: Chairman Rhonda McCarvel, Commissioner Gregory Wilson, Commissioner Steven Yearsley, Commissioner Treg Bernt, Commissioner Jessica Perreault and Commissioner Bill Cassanelli. Members Absent: Commissioner Ryan Fitzgerald. Others Present: Machelle Hill, Andrea Pogue, Caleb Hood, Sonya Allen, Josh Beach and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance __X___ Treg Bernt ___X___ Steven Yearsley __X___ Gregory Wilson _______ Ryan Fitzgerald __X___ Jessica Perreault ___X___ Bill Cassanelli _______ Rhonda McCarvel - Chairman McCarvel: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. At this time I would like to call to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission on May 18th, 2017. Let's begin with roll call. Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda McCarvel: The first item on the agenda -- on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda. We have two items this evening that will be opened for the sole purpose of continuing these items and they are H-2017-0050, Bannock Ridge and H-2017-0052, Meridian Meats. I will be opened solely for the purpose of continuing. So, if there is anybody here tonight to testify on those particular applications, we will not be taking testimony today. So, could I get a motion to adopt the agenda as amended? Bernt: So moved. Wilson: Second. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 2 of 30 McCarvel: It has been moved and second to adopt the agenda. All in favor say. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 3: Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of May 4, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting McCarvel: The next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. We have just the approval of the minutes of the May 4th Planning and Zoning Meeting on the Consent Agenda. So, could I get a motion to accept the Consent Agenda as presented. Perreault: So moved. Yearsley: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to adopt the Consent Agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. McCarvel: At this time I would like to briefly explain the public hearing process for this evening. We will open each item individually and, then, start with the staff report. The staff will report their findings regarding how the item adheres to our Comprehensive Plan and Uniform Development Code with the staff's recommendations. After the staff has made the presentation, the applicant will come forward to present their case for approval of their application and respond to any staff comments. The applicant will have 15 minutes to do so. After the applicant has finished we will open to public testimony. There is a sign-up sheet in the back as you entered for anyone wishing to testify. Any person testifying will come forward and be allowed three minutes and there is a timer on the screen in front of you. If they are speaking for a larger group, like an HOA, and there is a show of hands to represent that group, they will be given up to ten minutes. After all testimony has been heard, the applicant will be given anothe r ten minutes to have the opportunity to come back and respond if they desire. After that we will close the public hearing and the Commissioners have the opportunity to discuss and, hopefully, be able to make a recommendation to City Council. Item 4: Action Items Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 3 of 30 A. Public Hearing for Bannock Ridge (H-2017-0050) by Two C Development, LLC Located 2940, 3101 & 3155 S. Mesa Way 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 9.42 Acres of Land with an R-4 Zoning District 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Thirty One (31) Building Lots and Six (6) Common Lots on 13.57 Acres of Land in the R-4 Zoning District McCarvel: At this time I would like to open public hearing for Item No. H -2017-0050 in order to be continued. Yearsley: Madam Chair, I would move that we continue file number H -2017-0050 to June 1st, 2017. Wilson: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded and to continue item H -2017-0050. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. B. Public Hearing for Meridian Meats (H-2017-0052) by Meridian Meat and Sausage, Inc. Located 119 E. Bower Street Public Hearing Continued to June 1, 2017 1. Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval to Expand an Existing Nonconforming Use (Food Products Processing) for the Purpose of Constructing McCarvel: Next on the agenda I would like to open the public hearing for Item No. H - 2017-0052 in order to be continued to June 1. Wilson: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Wilson. Wilson: I move we continue H-2017-0052 to the date of June 1st, 2017. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 4 of 30 Bernt: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to move H -2017-0052 to June 1st. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. C. Public Hearing for Urban Air (H-2017-0046) by LimitLess Entertainment Boise, LLC Located 3820 & 3876 E. Lanark Street 1. Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval to Operate an Indoor Recreation Facility in an I-L Zoning District McCarvel: At this time I would like to open and hear public hearing for Item No. H -2017- 0046, LimitLess Entertainment. Urban Air. Beach: Very good, Madam Chair, Members of the Commission. This is an application for a conditional use permit. The site consists of approximately 11.13 acres of land. As you can see here on the map in front of you, a portion of the property that this use will encompass is not the entire property, just a portion on the -- on the eastern side, located at 3820 and 3870 East Lanark Street. The property is surrounded by property that is already zoned I-L or light industrial. This property was granted a preliminary plat in 2006 and a final plat in 2010. The Comprehensive Pla n future land use map designation for the property is industrial. The applicant is requesting approval to operate an indoor recreation facility from an existing warehouse building. The property is currently zoned, as I said, I-L or light industrial. Per the UDC arts, entertainment, or recreation facility indoors, which is how we classify this, requires a conditional use permit in the I-L zone and is subject to the specific use standards. The scope of work includes conversion of an open warehouse and off ice space into an indoor recreation facility. The proposed facility will be occupying approximately 42,000 square feet of the total approximately 142,800 square foot building. As I said, a conditional use permit is necessary to establish the use. Access to the site is taken from North Gaudians Avenue and from East Lanark Street, designated both as -- as collector roadways. Access to the site is consistent with the requirements set forth in the UDC. No other access points are proposed or approved with this application. Per the UDC all industrial districts require one space for every 2,000 square feet of gross floor area. The site is currently developed with a -- as I said, 142,800 square foot warehouse building, of which 42,000 square feet is proposed for the use. Based on the existing and planned square footage, the site must provide a minimum of 21 parking stalls. The submitted Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 5 of 30 site provides a total of 91 parking stalls. So, that would be -- following my mouse here -- and I have a -- a better plan here. So, lining up the parking just around their building there is approximately 91 parking stalls for the use. In addition, the UDC also requires that bicycle parking be installed on site and that is one bicycle parking space for every 25 proposed vehicle stalls. So, the applicant is required to install four bicycle parking stalls as part of this use. The applicant has indicated that the hours of operation for the business will be Monday through Thursday, 3:00 to 8:00 p.m. Friday and Saturday , 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Sunday, 10:00 am to 8:00 p.m. The hours of operation are mostly in the evenings and weekends and will not overlap -- only overlap for two hours with the other businesses located on the property. The applicant has indicated that the two adjacent businesses are unmanned warehouses, so parking for the facility should not be an issue. The purpose of a certificate of zoning compliance -- the applicant is also -- let me back up. The applicant is also required to apply for and receive certificate of zoning compliance approval for the site to establish the use. With that staff did not receive any comments and we are recommending approval of the application. McCarvel: Okay. Thank you. Would the applicant like to come forward? Brown: For the record, Kent Brown. 3161 East Springwood, Meridian, Idaho. As Josh has explained, we feel that this is a good fit for our facility and what we are trying to accomplish there. Having those two unmanned warehouses adjacent to us even provides more of that building with -- where we are not conflicting with those other uses and, then, our evening and weekend hours also probably isn't going to conflict with anybody either. My client is here from Dallas, Texas, and is here to explain if you have questions about the particular uses and the activities that go on inside, if you care to have that presentation. McCarvel: Sure. Brown: Okay. Thank you. Jagannathan: Good evening. Thanks for having me. My name is Suraj Jagannathan and I'm from Dallas, Texas. The concept that I am bringing to Meridian -Boise-Nampa market is called Urban Air Adventure Park. Not necessarily a trampoline park, but it is an indoor trampoline facility with additional items -- additional attractions that will encompass all of the main event, a Dave and Buster's type environment. Major course is rock climbing, laser tag, mini golf, arcade and most importantly trampolines and we chose to do this, because as a father of two girls that are three and a half ye ars old, I understand the -- and a former athlete myself, I understand the importance of taking Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 6 of 30 your kids someplace and having an exercising, fulfilling time just to get your kids out and do something, so you can sit back and relax and we think this -- this concept here will -- is going to bring something phenomenal to the market that doesn't fully encompass everything. I know there are some competitors in Jump Time and Circus Tricks that have portions of all of this, but not one facility that encompasses everything and with the market here of approximately 102,000 kids within the entire MSA within -- you guys know better than me -- but at 676 K, NSA population, I think that the percentages work out very well to have this. I have actually -- I have a 3D pdf if you would like to look at what we look to have inside the facility. It doesn't include the party rooms or private rooms that we will have. It's just some of the attractions that we are going to have in there, but -- so, as you can see to the right where the young kid is, that's going to be the ropes course. I think one of your other locations here has that. To the left is the ninja warrior course, which is very popular amongst all the kids these days and especially -- I'm sure you guys have seen the warrior courses on television as well. Here we have all the trampolines set up. To the far left we have a battle beam area for jousting. And, then, there is another visual of the warrior course. Basketball dunk. To the left or middle corner is a drop zone, jumping off a trampoline into a parachute dropping area. This is an aerial view of everything. If you look to the right there is a -- bottom right. That is a tubes course. It's going to be a five story tubes course that allows kids ages from three to seven years old to just climb up and down tubes, slide down. From that as well, if you look at the orange -- I guess horseshoe type looking at -- that is going to be -- actually a skyrider. So, you will be strapped in and zip lining all the way through. And below we will have party tables, so you and your friends are -- specifically any of you guys and your friends that are sitting in the party play tables, they -- they will see these sky zip lining across the entire -- or half of the warehouse there. So, it's pretty cool. What is it? If you look at the top right of the facility it's a -- there is rock climbing. There is a volcano where you climb up the volcano and slide down. What isn't pictured -- if you look further to the right in the rooms -- you can't see it, but we are going to have black light laser tag and black light mini golf as well. The dodgeball court. I'm sure you guys -- many of you would love to go against your kids in this one. So, please, feel free to -- another angle of the tubes course. That is the end of that. Any questions, please? McCarvel: Any questions from the Commissioners? Bernt: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Bernt. Bernt: Are you going to be doing any renovations to the outside of the building? Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 7 of 30 Jagannathan: No, sir. Nothing. The only thing we will put up on the outside is an Urban Air logo and that is -- we will not be painting or doing anything else. Bernt: Is it currently -- what is this currently -- what does this building currently look like on the outside? Jagannathan: It's a clean warehouse with no windows. The windows are just the -- the doors. It's the old Scentsy building, if you -- Bernt: Oh, yeah. McCarvel: Anybody else? Cassanelli: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Yes, Commissioner Cassanelli. Cassanelli: What -- especially I guess on the weekends, but also on the week days. What kind of kind -- what kind of traffic counts kind of numbers do you anticipate? Jagannathan: Yeah. That's a very good question. I'm actually working with a -- the highway district right now and determining that, but during the week, because we will only be open 3:00 to 8:00 p.m., those traffic counts we expect to be very low. We expect our -- our peak hours on the weekends, on Saturdays and Sundays, to be between 11:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. As we -- as all the past Urban Airs across the U.S., majority of the birthday parties are during that time. So, from a traffic count perspective -- I apologize, I don't want to mislead you or give you incorrect information and I don't have that with me, so -- Cassanelli: Not necessarily traffic counts, but I guess more attendance, if you will. You know, how many people do you typically -- I mean what's an average Saturday going through the -- you know, coming through the doors? Jagannathan: So, the average -- I have put this number at the -- the average Urban Air has 10,000 customers a month. That puts it at -- if you use eight Saturdays you're looking at a little over -- from -- in an eight hour day you need about 800 customers -- 883 customers an hour. So, we multiple thousands -- two to three thousand on a Saturday and on a Sunday as well and because the birthday parties are two hours at a time, all of that -- and you should do -- we are actually going to be able to have about 15 Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 8 of 30 birthday parties at once. That's going to put a bulk -- a rush coming in at 1:00 and, then, two hours later another rush coming in. Two hours later another rush coming in. So, they are spread out like that. Cassanelli: Thank you. McCarvel: Anybody else? All right. Thank you. Jagannathan: Thank you. McCarvel: At this time we would open to public testimony. I assume, Kent, you have already -- we can scratch you off. All right. Anybody else wishing to testify on this issue? Okay. So, at this time if there is no other questions by the Commissioners, we will close the public hearing. So, could I get a motion to close the public hearing, Item No. H-2017-0046. Bernt: So moved. Wilson: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to close the public hearing on Item No. H- 2017-0046. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. McCarvel: Any thoughts on this fun place, other than you would want to be a kid now? Perreault: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Yes. Perreault: I have a question for staff. Should the Commission be concerned that there is a similar facility that's slated or expected to be going in down the road on Franklin within a mile or two? Is that any concern of ours? Or we are just considering unconditional use and -- Beach: You got it. No. Perreault: No? Okay. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 9 of 30 McCarvel: Okay. Cassanelli: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Yes. Commissioner Cassanelli. Cassanelli: Just comments. Exactly, I'd like to be a kid again. Wish this was around. For staff is there -- is the remainder of that building -- it said it was unmanned. Does that mean there is no current uses there or are they occupied? Beach: So, to answer your question, yeah, there are several warehouses just to the west of this building, but they are unmanned warehouses and there is no employees there. Cassanelli: Okay. Beach: So, that's what they mean by unmanned. There is just several users further down in the building, but the several tenants just next door are -- are just warehouses. Bernt: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Yes. Bernt: I believe that there is a Rhino Rush right down there. Beach: Yes. Bernt: I believe that's manned. And, then, I believe that -- I believe that the Boise Slam basketball club is right there and it's mostly evenings and weekends. So, I think there might be a hair more traffic than now then -- as far as parking lots are concerned, there will be a little more, you know, people there than what we are talking about. I don't think a lot, but there is -- I know when Slam is having events there -- my kids play Slam -- there is -- the whole front of that area is all parking -- you know, all of those parking lots are full, so just food for thought. McCarvel: Yeah. Cassanelli: That's my -- my one concern on that is it meets the minimum requirements, obviously, on the parking, but -- but that's -- that's what I was kind of alluding to with my questions in terms of the number of kids and I know from other places like this a Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 10 of 30 majority of the kids are just dropped off , parents -- they drop off and run, but -- and there is a lot to say if they are -- we are talking, you know, a thousand or more people through on a -- on a Saturday -- on a busy Saturday with kids -- you know, the road out front -- is that Lanark? Is that the name of that road out front? Will that -- can that be parked upon and are there -- are there overflow parking areas around? Wilson: I mean they have exceeded -- I mean they are exceeding the amount of stalls by a significant number. McCarvel: Yes. Wilson: And that's not a -- I mean that's -- I don't know where you guys -- if you guys know where that's at. I mean that's kind of off the beaten path a little bit, so -- Cassanelli: Yeah. Wilson: So, I don't -- that's just something -- I will just comment on it. I'm not concerned about that. I think they exceed the parking list -- or the number and it's a little off the beaten path, so it's not going to be a -- you know, a challenge. Beach: So, quickly if I could. Yeah. So, Lanark is a public road. It does appear to be wide enough -- and I don't have the exact width of the road, but it is a public road. The -- yeah. So, let me -- let me show you this -- pardon me while I switch my map here again. So, the site, as you can see, is -- I believe it's this entire portion here. There is parking all the way around the back. As I mentioned, there is approximately 91 parking spaces. So, for an industrial user the code requires one parking space for every 200 -- or 2,000 square feet. They are not an industrial user. So, that in this case it would be commercial, which requires one space for every 500 square feet and doing the math of their 42,000 square feet, they would be required to have 84 parking stalls and they have 91. So, they meet that requirement with a few extra. And keep in mind there is a large number of parking stalls on the rear side of the building as well. I don't know that a majority of those at Boise Slam will be parking in these areas back here to walk all the way around the building to get -- to get where they are going. So, I think the site is adequately parked. McCarvel: Yeah. From my own sense, I think most of your busy time is going to be even when -- you know, even the unmanned warehouse portion is not in use and so I think there is plenty of space for overflow. I think it's a great use for a big empty building. Anyone else? Commissioners? Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 11 of 30 Wilson: I think he might -- McCarvel: Your mic. There you go. Hood: The applicant came up and I just want to share a couple thoughts. It seems like you moved on from parking. But, obviously, they don't want to have a parking problem either. They did say that if -- if there is an issue, there is an ability to stripe out some more parking on the north side of the building. You can kind of see there, it's -- there is some area -- yeah, kind of in that or even on the back side of the -- the building itself where you could stripe it for more parking if it does become a problem and they also confirmed parking is allowed on Lanark. So, it's not prohibited on -- on Lanark. So, there is some overflow there as well. Wilson: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Mr. Wilson. Wilson: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve file number H-2017-0046 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 18th, 2017. Bernt: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to approve Item No. H-2017-0046. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Congratulations. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. D. Public Hearing for Franklin Daycare (H-2017-0047) by Donna Franklin Located 4657 N. Price Avenue 1. Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval of a Daycare Group for up to Twelve (12) Children in an R-8 Zoning District McCarvel: Okay. Moving on. At this time we would like to open public hearing for Item No. H-2017-0047 for Donna Franklin and we will begin with the staff report. Beach: Pardon me. This is as well an application for a conditional use permit. This site consists of approximately 0.14 of an acre of land, which is zoned R-8. It's located at Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 12 of 30 4657 North Price Avenue. The property is developed with a single family detached home. As I said zoned R-8. In 2005 the property was annexed and zoned and granted a preliminary plat for the Amber -- as part of the Amber Creek Subdivision. In 2014 the property was granted final plat approval. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation for the property is medium density residential. The request in this case is for a conditional use permit to operate what we call a day care group in a 2,620 square foot home for up to 12 children. The applicant has indicated that she will be using approximately 1,066 square feet of the home for her daycare. The UDC allows for up to six children in what we call a daycare family, which requires an accessory use permit in the R-8 zoning district and to allow for a 12 children in a -- again, what we call a daycare group, the R-8 zoning district requires a conditional use permit. One of the main reasons for this distinction is the increased numb er of vehicle trips for the daycare group. There are specific use standards listed in the UDC that apply to daycare facilities. I can go through those quickly, but the type of daycare facility, the total number of children at the facility at one time , including the operators' children, is a determining factor. In this case the applicant is requesting up to 12 children. On-site vehicle pick up, parking, and turnaround areas shall be provided to ensure safe discharge and pick up of clients. In this case you can see the applicant has a three car garage, as well as three parking stalls in front and there is also the ability to have some drop off, pick up in front of the home on a public road. The decision-making body shall specify the maximum number of allowable clients and hours of operation as conditions of approval. So, there is the ability to reduce those if the Commission so desires. Due to the fact that the proposed daycare center is within an existing building and no site or exterior building modifications are proposed, a certificate of zoning compliance application will not be required. Staff is recommending approval of the application. I did receive a written testimony from Leslie Halverson from the HOA regarding some fencing that the applicant is proposing to change as part of the -- part of the application. Again, staff is recommending approval and I will the stand for any questions you have. McCarvel: Any questions for staff? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward? As you approach the mic, please, state your name and address for the record. Franklin: My name is Donna Franklin. Address is 4657 North Price Avenue in Meridian. 83646. And I'm requesting the conditional use permit for a daycare up to 12 children. The fence is being worked on in the morning, so they are raising the fence from four foot to six foot, which is required by the City of Meridian and I think that was the main concern that I read on the staff meeting notes. So, that is being taken care of tomorrow. McCarvel: Okay. Any questions for the applicant? Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 13 of 30 Perreault: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Perrault. Perrault: Do you have an idea of the ages that you will have in the home ? How many infants? How many toddlers? Franklin: I typically -- I did daycare in California and had up to 14 and, typically, I don't take more than two or three infants. The rest are two to four years old. I don't take any school age, kindergarten. So, up to about age five, depending on when the kids start kindergarten. Perrault: And you don't have concerns about having up to 14 people in a thousand square foot space? Franklin: No. The space here is bigger than where I was in California and I had up to 14. Here it's only 12 that's allowed through the health department and they have already been out and inspected and approved everything. So, this is the final and, then, next week the fire inspector will come out and check and he's already said that everything should be fine, because if you go off of his recommendations, dividing the 35 into the 1,066 square foot, that would allow me over 30 kids, which I would never do, but that's what the fire inspector on their forms -- is how they evaluate how many that you can have. So, I won't do any more than 12, if that, but that's the way they break it down with the health department and state -- excuse me -- state of Idaho. Perreault: Thank you. McCarvel: Any other questions? Cassanelli: Question, Madam Chair. McCarvel: Commissioner Cassanelli. Cassanelli: Do you have set hours at this point in time? Franklin: It will be 7:30 to 5:30, Monday through Friday, and the holidays will be closed. McCarvel: Okay. Thank you. Franklin: Thank you. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 14 of 30 McCarvel: Okay. So, at this time could I get a motion to close the public hearing for -- oh, sorry. Thank you. Jumped ahead. We will take public testimony. I have two people signed up. Susan Matlock. Matlock: Yes. I am a neighbor directly -- McCarvel: Please state your name and address for the record. Matlock: Oh, I'm sorry. Susan Matlock. 4672 North Price Avenue. I'm almost directly across from the proposed daycare and I'm a yard fanatic and I'm out all the time and it has been so quiet and drop off and pick up -- I realized she has less right now, but it's been very orderly. I don't have a problem with it at all. McCarvel: Okay. Matlock: Thank you. McCarvel: Thank you. And Tony Franklin. You're good? Okay. Anyone else wishing to testify on this issue? Okay. Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward again and address any issues that were raised ? Thank you. Okay. So, at this time could I get a motion to close the public hearing for Item No. H-2017-0047. Cassanelli: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Cassanelli. Cassanelli: I move we close the public hearing for item H-2017-0046. Wilson: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to close the public hearing for Item No. H- 2017-0047. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. McCarvel: Comments? Concerns? Discussion? Wilson: Madam Chair? Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 15 of 30 McCarvel: Commissioner Wilson. Wilson: I think it's pretty straight forward. I mean we have done a couple of these the past year or so. I think it's straight forward and I think the neighbor preempted any questions we might have in terms of pick up and whether that's, you know, loud or whether it's busy or whether -- I mean I just think everything got satisfied at least for me and I will be supporting it. McCarvel: Okay. Yeah. I think with the parking to be consistent with what we have done in the past, this does support the parking spaces that we had somewhat of an issue with in the past and it seems to be running efficiently so far. Anybody else? Comments? Okay. Wilson: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Wilson. Wilson: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve file number H-2017-0047 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 18th, 2017. Bernt: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to approve Item No. H-2017-0047. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Congratulations. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. E. Public Hearing for My First Steps Daycare (H-2017-0054) by Darya Krautsova Located 3545 S. Pompei 1. Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval for a Group Daycare for up to Twelve (12) Children on 0.15 of an Acre in an R-8 Zoning District McCarvel: Okay. At this time we will move forward and I'd like to open the public hearing for Item No. H-2017-0054, My First Steps, and we will begin with the staff report. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 16 of 30 Allen: Thank you, Chairman, Commissioners. The next application before you is a request for a conditional use permit. This site consists of .15 of an acre of land, zoned R-8, located at 3545 South Pompei Avenue. This site is surrounded by existing residential properties and vacant and undeveloped land zoned R-8. This property is platted as Lot 3, Block 11, of Tuscany Village Subdivision No. 2. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation is medium density residential. The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit for a group daycare for up to 12 children between the ages of six weeks to six years old in the R-8 zoning district. The home consists of 1,731 square feet and has a three car garage with a concrete parking pad in front of the garage for off-street parking for clients. The rear yard play area is fenced with a six foot tall vinyl fence. The proposed hours of operation are from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. The applicant is required to comply with the specific use standards for daycare facilities, which include, but are not limited to on-site vehicle pickup, parking and turnaround areas. Hours of operation not exceeding 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Provision of a six foot tall, nonscalable fence around the play area and background check and Fire Department inspection. Staff has verified that the applicant complies with the required standards for a daycare facility. Written testimony has been received from Darya Krautsova, the applicant. She is in agreement with the staff report. And staff is recommending approval with the conditions in Exhibit B of the staff report. Staff will stand for any questions. McCarvel: Any questions for staff? Yearsley: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Yearsley. Yearsley: I don't have any questions, but I do want to state -- I am currently the president of the Tuscany Homeowners Association, but I do not feel that this application causes a conflict of interest, so I just wanted to at least disclose that before we move forward. McCarvel: Okay. Yearsley: Thank you. McCarvel: Thank you. Any other questions? Would the applicant like to come forward? And as you approach the mic, please, state your name and address for the record. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 17 of 30 Krautsova: My name is Darya Krautsova. I'm located at 3545 South Pompei and I agree with the staff recommendations. I can answer any questions if you have any. McCarvel: I would -- are you currently running a small -- do you currently have less than six? Krautsova: I have six right now. McCarvel: Okay. And you're wanting to move up to -- Krautsova: Twelve. McCarvel: All the way up to 12? Krautsova: Uh-huh. McCarvel: And that's been working well for you so far? Krautsova: Yes, it has. McCarvel: Okay. Any other questions? Okay. All right. Thank you. I don't have anybody on the sign-up sheet for this application, but is there anybody in the audience that wishes to testify? Okay. So, at this time could I get a motion to close the public hearing for Item No. H-2017-0054, My First Steps? Wilson: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Wilson. Wilson: I move we close H-2017-0054. Bernt: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to close Item No. H-2017-0054. All those in favor say aye. Oppose? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. McCarvel: Any comments from the Commissioners? Thoughts? Pretty straight forward. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 18 of 30 Cassanelli: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Cassanelli. Cassanelli: I have a question for staff. What were the conditions of Exhibit B? I do not have a staff report. Allen: Chairman, Commissioner Cassanelli -- clerk? You don't have a copy of the staff report at all? Cassanelli: Not with those exhibits. Allen: Okay. Hang on. Let me -- if you have a copy of the staff report, it's going to be right after the Exhibit A with a vicinity map in it. It's just basically containing the specific use standards that the applicant needs to comply with the staff has verified that they are in compliance with. McCarvel: Okay. Wilson: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Wilson. Wilson: After -- I hope I'm not going too quickly with this. After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve file number H-2017-0054 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 18th, 2017. Bernt: Second. McCarvel: Okay. It has been moved and seconded to approve Item No. H-2017-0054. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Congratulations. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. F. Public Hearing for Geddes Subdivision (H-2017-0041) by Schultz Development Located Southeast of the W. Ustick Road and N. Black Cat Road Intersection 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 2.08 Acres of Land Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 19 of 30 with an R-8 Zoning District 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Ten (10) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 2.08 Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning District McCarvel: Okay. So, at this time we'd like to open public hearing for Item No. H-2017- 0041, Geddes Subdivision, and we will open with the staff report. Allen: Thank you, Chairman, Commissioners. The next application before you is a request for annexation and zoning and a preliminary plat . This site consists of 2.08 acres of land, is currently zoned RUT in Ada county and is located off of the southeast corner of North Black Cat and West Ustick Roads. Adjacent land use and zoning. To the north are rural and urban single family residential properties in Klamath Basin Subdivision, zoned RUT in Ada county and R-4. To the east are single family residential properties in Statin Park Subdivision, zoned R-4. To the south are single family residential properties in Ashford Greens and Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision No. 9, zoned R-4. And to the west are rural residential property, zoned RUT in Ada county. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation is low density residential. The applicant is requesting approval of annexation and zoning of 2.8 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district. A step up in density is requested from the low density residential, which is three or fewer units per acre, to the medium density residential, which is three to eight units per acre, as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan without an amendment to the future land use map, with Council approval. A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of ten single family residential building lots and four common lots on 2.08 acres of land in the proposed R-8 zoning district. The gross density of the proposed subdivision is 4.8 dwelling units per acre, with a net density of 8.9 units per acre, which is consistent with the requested step up in density, if approved. The minimum property size is 4,034 square feet, with an average lot size of 4,960 square feet. Access is proposed via the extension of a local street, North Geddes Avenue, from the south. A stub street is proposed to the west for future extension and interconnectivity. Because a roundabout is planned at the Black Cat-Ustick intersection, staff was concerned about how the properties to the north and west could redevelop in the future and requested the applicant submit a concept plan addressing this, which he did, and I will just flip back here to the vicinity map for a minute here , so if you can see it, the intersection here, this is where the roundabout is planned and, then, the applicant submitted this concept plan showing how that property could redevelop possibly in the future with an access from the proposed subdivision and this does meet -- appear to meet UDC standards and Fire Department code. A common driveway is proposed for access to the three homes at the southeast corner of the development . The applicant is Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 20 of 30 proposing .11 of an acre of common area adjacent to the cul-de-sac at the northeast corner of the site along the Eight Mile Lateral, which runs along the east boundary of the site. The unified development code does not require qualified open space and site amenities to be provided for development that is below five acres in size. However, because the applicant is requesting approval of a step up in density, staff recommends a qualifying site amenity, such as a picnic area with tables, benches and a shade structure or other qualified amenity is provided as a provision of the development agreement. The applicant also requests Council approval of a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6, to leave the Eight Mile Lateral open and not pipe it as required by the UDC due to its large capacity. Conceptual elevations were submitted as shown for future homes within this development. Building materials consist of horizontal and vertical siding with stone veneer accents. Written testimony has been received from Matt Schultz, the applicant's representative. He is in agreement with the staff report. Staff is recommending approval with the conditions in the report contingent upon Council's approval of a step up in density as requested. Staff will stand for questions. McCarvel: Any questions? Yearsley: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Yearsley. Yearsley: Sonya, did parks and rec comment on any pathways proposed or is that kind of already landlocked to that area? Allen: Chairman, Commissioner, there are no pathways required along the Eight Mile Lateral in this area. Yearsley: All right. Thank you. McCarvel: Okay. Any other questions for staff? Would the applicant like to come forward? Please state your name and address for the record. Schultz: Yes. Good evening, Madam Chair, Commissioners. Matt Schultz. 8421 South Ten Mile in Meridian. Thanks for having me tonight. Kind of a little small piece. Two acres. It's got a little bit of an odd shape to it. But I think it kind of lays out nicely for -- for a townhome product that Robert Campbell, the owner, who is also a builder, is doing. He has done another one -- it's about a mile south of here, almost do south, called Reardon Sub on the south side of Cherry Lane between Ten Mile and Black Cat. We have ten lots. Nice single -- single story townhomes. Not two story. Which is Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 21 of 30 important. It's why it felt real comfortable for me to represent it that it was a single story and that's something that we are going to subject yourself to through a development agreement with Council is single story, 1,500 square foot minimum. These elevations that you see -- these are actual pictures of stuff that's for sale or sold right now as we speak, in between that 250 and 300 thousand dollar range for a 1,500 square foot, 2,000 square foot home and we are willing to subject ourselves to a 1,500 square foot minimum home. There is no minimums in an R-8. There is a 1,400 square foot minimum in an R-4 by code, but we are willing to, you know, put that into a development agreement for 1,500. So, that's a nice -- nice little project. About half of it turned out to be road, because it's just so odd shaped and all the roads will be on-street parking. There is no parking limitation, as well as full turnaround. So, it's all to code. We are not asking for any variances. We are asking for a waiver to -- to the city code that we not tile the Eight Mile Lateral, because it would the equivalent of maybe a 48 inch plus and Council grants those for 30 to 36 inch all the time. Everybody else south of us hasn't tiled it. It looks like a nice, safe, wide ditch bank there. I walked it today before the hearing just to make sure I kind of get a good feel for the site. It's got a good access. It has sewer and water right there. The project to the south of us that was put in 20 years ago -- 17 to 20 years ago, is kind of the age -- if you look at the plats that abut to us, bigger lots. That's what they did 17 to 20 years ago. It was all R-4, 8,000 square foot minimum. Just what we did back then. I just think this is a good little -- we think we will probably get a lot of buyers -- maybe even from the subdivision next to us that want to down size now that they are empty nesters and want a fully maintained yard, which will be part of the package to -- part of the HOA dues will come -- the lawn maintenance will come with it. It's really kind of marketing towards the 55 and over, although we are not -- I don't think we are going to -- you know, write in the CC&Rs you have to be 55 or over, but that's really who the market is on this, those people that want a single story, nice, upper end, nicely done inside and out house that Robert Campbell is going to do on this one, so -- but we do agree with staff conditions. All of them. The amenity was something we were going to do anyways. It wasn't required, so we didn't worry about it. We have actually had our landscape architect draw up -- if you can go back, Sonya, to that color of rendering, please. Where those three trees are shown, we have put a shade shelter, sitting area amenity, something nice. We are not -- we don't have the exact details yet, but we will -- we will run those by planning staff and -- that's something we were going to do anyways, we just -- so, that's why we are okay with the conditions of approval. Maybe put that in there that staff came up with. And I did do a layout, even though -- you know, it's -- we have access. We are providing sewer stub, water stub. We are providing access -- and it actually kind of lays out kind of nice -- nice and efficient. About the same density, using the same size lots we did. There is about 20 more lots that could go in there. So, that would meet the fire code. There is emergency access I provided anyways. If somebody wanted an emergency access they could. But Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 22 of 30 if you plot a circle on their equal to like the Eagle -- Eagle and Amity roundabout, let's say, it doesn't even really -- almost hardly even touch the -- the green triangle in the corner there. It's deceiving. You know, you think it would just come way out and take out some lots even, maybe, the roundabout, but it's deceiving how -- how small the footprint that round about really does have if you plot it on that corner from the center of the -- from the top left-hand corner of the page there. So, it doesn't really come into play, really, with this layout. Other than you can't take any access between Moon Lake, which is the road just to the south of us, and Ustick Road. And that's the main concern is they are not going to have any access, because ACHD doesn't want any access with a roundabout right there. That's why we had to show how that would work not taking access out. You have emergency access, but it's not full vehicular access, so -- I guess with that we will stand for any questions and we agree with -- with all staff conditions. Thanks. McCarvel: Any questions for the applicant? Perreault: Yes, Madam Chair. McCarvel: Commissioner Perreault. Perreault: I'm sorry, did you say that you're anticipating putting townhomes there? Schultz: They are detached -- Perreault: The renderings show the single family. They are detached single family. Schultz: I'm sorry. I used that term a little loosely. I'm sorry. But they are not attached. They will be single -- Perreault: Yeah. They will be single family -- Schultz: Single family detached, five foot side yard setbacks -- Perreault: Okay. Schultz: -- 12 foot rear, 20 foot in the front to the garage. The R-8 allows a ten foot setback that's non-garage space, which this -- if you look at those elevations, they have a living space that pops out in front of the garage to get that square footage. So, yeah, I'm sorry. My bad. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 23 of 30 Yearsley: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Yearsley. Yearsley: So, when you said you laid out the Eagle and Amity intersection, did you assume the four lane -- or the two lane segment or just a single line segment? Schultz: I just took a diameter on the Eagle-Amity one, which is a single lane, I believe, and, then, added -- it was like a 200 foot -- or 150 foot radius or something. It was pretty big. Yearsley: Okay. Schultz: You know. It doesn't -- just doesn't come into play. I thought it would. I thought it would come into play, but it really doesn't come into play very much. Yearsley: Okay. Schultz: Geometrically at least. Yearsley: Thank you. McCarvel: Any other questions for the applicant? Okay. Schultz: Thanks. McCarvel: At the time we will begin with public testimony. Start with the sign-up sheet. We have Robert Campbell. Do you wish to testify? Okay. I guess the only one that really marked that they wanted to testify was Mike Sorensen. And, please, state your name and address for the record. Sorensen: Yes. My name is Mike Sorensen . 10334 West Milclay. I owned the two acres a year ago and sold it to Mr. Campbell. I guess I'm at a little loss of words, because I wasn't even sure about the roundabout. Actually, my wife and I still own the three acres just north of there. So, I'm not sure how that's going to affect -- affect our home and where we live there, because the home sits right there in the corner pretty much where the green, so I'm not even sure how that roundabout is going to -- going to affect us. I guess my major consideration today was two points. Number one, Mr. Campbell and the developer, again, is showing a road -- my home on three acres, it was going to be landlocked I was going to ask the planning and zoning for consideration of Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 24 of 30 stubbing a road to my place, which would be on the -- the north side of this development. Again, there is a road stubbed in. He is planning on stubbing a road into the west side of the development through my neighbor Earl Rhodes. You'd have to know Earl Rhodes. He -- that road will not go through until Earl dies, which could be 20 to 30 years. And, again, that's going to leave me someone -- somewhat landlocked. I don't assume with a roundabout in -- again, the planning and zoning would not, I'm sure, allow another feeder road coming off Black Cat to service a development if -- if I wanted to with my home on the three acres, there, again, just north of this development. So, I guess that was my concern is -- is a road being stubbed into my place. It will be pretty much landlocked. I guess I would -- it would be a home and a shop on three acres, because, again, there really is no other avenue. He shows an avenue through -- through a neighbor's place, but, again, like I said, that neighbor is not going to develop that or allow anything in there. I have been trying to buy that piece of property from him for 25 years or have him buy mine for 25 years and it's sort of been a futile exchange, so -- so, that would be my -- my first concern is, number one, possibly having a road stubbed in. Secondly, where the utilities are, first, I have a water -- a ditch where I get water, which is on the north side of this two acres. A few years ago when a development was done my water rights were cut off for about a year and a half . I just wanted to make sure that they continue to deliver water. It would be through that two acres and coming to my place and, then, the second thing, which I don't know about, I guess what I'm asking for is a utility easement also. I have gas running from where the gas is stubbed in there to Geddes, along the west side of the two acres. If this makes sense. To my land. Right there were Geddes is stubbed in, that's where all the utilities are and about 15 years ago I had a gas line run across the north side of his two acres and into my three acres and shop and home. We don't have gas running down Black Cat, so I asked for -- for a line to be run from Geddes to my place and, again, it runs across the -- the west end of these two acres and I would ask for -- I guess a utility easement if that's available, because I have no other way to heat my home. McCarvel: Thank you. Anyone else wishing to testify on this application? Would the applicant like to come back forward? Do we have any answers for Mr. Sorenson? Schultz: Maybe. Commissioner -- Madam Chairman and Commissioners, I -- I will start with the easy ones first. The irrigation ditch -- there is a ditch that runs parallel to the Eight Mile Lateral, just kind of on the edge of our common -- common lots back there -- Perreault: Could you speak into the microphone. Schultz: Yeah. Our preliminary plat shows piping. So, we are going to pipe that and not alter any deliveries to him. We are not going to mess with his irrigation. We never Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 25 of 30 do that intentionally, you know. So, we will -- we will make sure that it keeps on flowing perfectly. The -- the gas I don't think is a problem. Obviously, we could provide a corridor along a side lot line. There is a public utility easement along all side lot lines. If it's used and we would just, obviously, ask him to -- you know, if there is any cost to relocate and that, you know, to be his as far as that goes. In fact, if it's on our property, is there an easement for it now, I don't know. You know, I haven't -- I don't know if it's on our property or on his -- I -- I don't know of one, but I haven't done a deep title search either to see if there is an actual easement across our property right now for that existing facility, that may or may not be there. I am just not aware. But we are wanting to cooperate on that for sure. If he currently has a gas line across our property. The last one, which is the more difficult one, is the -- the idea of us providing a stub street to the north and to the west at the same time, I guess. Because if we do it to him, then, we have to do it to the other guy and which one do you provide it to? Is it incumbent upon us to -- to make sure he can develop tomorrow, because if we don't develop he really can't develop. So, the fact that we are developing, do we -- do we need to provide that for him. It's kind of a unique location of properties. I'm not sure if I'm responsible to provide for his efficient development, other than to provide a good stub and utility stub to our property boundary, which we are doing. One of our property boundaries. So, I will leave that up to you for your recommendation as to the politics between neighbors as to who wants to buy who and one person not agreeing to sell and development and the other one wants to -- it's kind of out of our control, you know, is what I'm saying. So, we just ask that you approve it as submitted and -- or at least provide a positive recommendation to Council. McCarvel: I have a question. Do we -- Sonya, do we have a map that shows -- I mean where his current access was -- Mr. Sorenson's current access is? A Google -- Allen: I will pull one up. Yeah. McCarvel: Because I'm assuming we are talking about this white blob here. The RUT. Yearsley: Madam Chair, while she's pulling that up -- it's my understanding that ACHD will not cut off his current access currently -- McCarvel: Yeah. Yearsley: -- the way it is, but if he wanted to develop they probably would not give him access to his site off of Black Cat for a development. Is -- Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 26 of 30 McCarvel: Right. And that's what -- I just want to see -- he's not -- not currently landlocked, it's just going forward if he were to develop. So, that's really not in this discussion I don't think. Hood: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Yes. Hood: Give Sonya another minute, if you don't mind -- McCarvel: Yes. Hood: -- while she pulls that up. So, like we just talked about it -- I mean it's not a landlocked property and ACHD would have to give them access to Black Cat, because there isn't any other place and -- and so both today and in the future if he did come in with a development application, they would still have to grant him an access to the public street. Now, what we could do is condition that, though, that is an interim access and once the two properties to the south -- similar to what Mr. Schultz developed -- you know, when that eventually develops out, then, that road goes away. But, you know, we would probably struggle as a city to say is this in the best interest of the city to allow a development there with another road, even if its interim, to Black Cat located that close to the intersection. McCarvel: Yeah. Hood: But, again, they would -- ACHD would have to grant them access, because that's the only place to the public roadway network, so -- I mean I will just -- Sonya isn't quite there yet. Just looking at -- and I appreciate the -- the neighbor to the north being here and the comment, but, really, having a stub -- having Geddes due to north is going to be very inefficient for the development of his property. You're going to be running that road along with the canal and you can't even put a buildable lot in there until you get about halfway through that property and, then, you're only going to have lots on one side. It's going to be pretty inefficient if you put a -- McCarvel: That's what I was wondering if we had a picture, because that's what I was envisioning. I'm like am I not seeing this right in my mind? I mean is there something simpler going on here? But I'm -- I agree, I don't think that's probably something -- Hood: I mean it could be done, but, again, that -- be careful what you wish for a little bit there, because I -- that makes it fairly inefficient to run -- to run that -- extend that, then, Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 27 of 30 through that property, so -- and that's all I'm -- what's best for him. I'm just saying that's one of the things -- one of the reasons we didn't require that. McCarvel: Yeah. Hood: It's not -- it's not a great location. Perreault: I'm sorry, are you referring to the -- the piece to the west is developed and -- Hood: I'm saying if -- if Geddes -- basically due north is what I heard -- Perreault: Yeah. Hood: -- the neighbor request. Perreault: Okay. Hood: Extending that when he's ready to develop, you can't even put a developable lot until you get a substantial distance of extension of that road, because you have got the narrow part of the triangle right there and you're 50 foot wide with a right of way. Well, you got to get wide enough to put a lot and even then you're only getting a lot on one side eventually, so -- and I don't know what his vision is for his property and maybe he only wants two or three lots. But that's about what you get. McCarvel: No. I was just -- all of sudden I was just -- is this really landlocked, but it's not at this point and -- okay. Any other questions? Yearsley: Madam Chair, just one last -- McCarvel: Commissioner Yearsley. Yearsley: Sorry. So, this will be an ACHD roadway; correct? Not a private roadway? Schultz: Commissioner Yearsley, it's absolutely a hundred percent public. Parking on road to their standards, yes. McCarvel: Okay. Okay. At this time could I get a motion to close the public hearing for Item No. H-2017-0041? Yearsley: So moved. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 28 of 30 Wilson: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to close the public hearing on Item No. H- 2017-0041, Geddes Subdivision. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. McCarvel: Comments? Thoughts out loud? Yearsley: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Yearsley. Yearsley: I actually like the design. I appreciate the restrictions that the -- the applicant is actually putting on himself for single story homes. I know it's a lot -- a little bit smaller than what's out there now, but I think it's actually -- with the single story homes and the way it's laid out, I think it -- I think it actually works. I think it will look really nice and be a good in-fill piece for that -- that section of property. Cassanelli: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Cassanelli. Cassanelli: I would reiterate that. I think -- my -- my first look before I saw anything was I'm not a huge fan of -- of bumping up the zoning when everything around it is -- is an R- 4 and to in-fill with an R-8. I'm just not a fan of -- a lot times the way it looks, it looks like a round peg in a square hole kind of -- kind of look to it. But I with -- with what they imposed with the -- the looks of the property, the way it's laid out, it's does -- it is an awkward piece and it's kind of hard to do a lot of things with it, so I do like it. I think the only thing in terms of my thoughts on -- on some of the conditions would be to address what has been discussed dealing with the gas issue and the -- and the irrigation coming off the canal there. McCarvel: Uh-huh. So, in the motion you would like to see some wording about protecting current water delivery and utilities -- Cassanelli: Right. McCarvel: -- on the property. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Page 29 of 30 Cassanelli: Correct. Yearsley: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Yearsley. Yearsley: I believe that -- that's kind of a standard condition -- McCarvel: Yes. Yearsley: -- already in place, so I don't think that that is necessary for the irrigation. That's -- that's what is required for developments, that they maintain that type of stuff. So, I don't know if that needs to be a condition. I don't have an issue with the -- the gas -- providing access for the gas. McCarvel: Yeah. I think it looks like -- I mean I agree with Commissioner Cassanelli, I'm usually not a big fan of an up step in density, but I think the way this is laid out it -- with the shape of the property and everything and most of it is -- a lot of its road, there is a lot of open space anyway. So, it's -- it's just down to the lot sizes. So, if there is no other comments, can we get a motion? Wilson: Madam Chair? McCarvel: Commissioner Wilson. Bernt: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend to City Council file number H-2017-0041 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 18th, 2017, with the condition that the applicant recognize that it -- it would be that gas pipeline that's going to that neighbor, that north landowner. Bernt: Second. McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to approve Item No. H-2017-0041, Geddes Subdivision. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: SIX AYES. ONE ABSENT. McCarvel: Okay. changes to Agenda: • Item #4A: Bannock Ridge (H-2017-0050) — Applicant requests continuance to June 1St in order to revise plans • Item #413: Meridian Meats (H-2017-0052) — Applicant requests continuance to June 1St due to a sign posting error. Item #4C: Urban Air (H-2017-0046) Application(s): ➢ Conditional Use Permit Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 11.13 acres of land, zoned I -L, located at 3820 and 3876 E. Lanark Street, Adjacent Land Use & Zoning: North: Warehouse, zoned I -L West: Warehouse, zoned I -L South: Vacant industrial land, zoned I -L East: Vacant industrial land, zoned I -L History: The City Council approved the preliminary plat (PP -06-055) for Seyam Subdivision on February 6, 2007. The Director approved an 18 month time extension for the preliminary plat on February 4, 2009. In January 26, 2010 City Council approved a final plat for the property. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Industrial Summary of Request: The applicant is requesting approval to operate an indoor recreation facility from an existing warehouse building. The property is currently zoned I -L (Light Industrial). Per UDC 11-2C-2, an "Arts, Entertainment or Recreation Facility, Indoors and Outdoors" requires conditional use permit approval in the I -L zone and is subject to specific use standards. Development Plans: The scope of work includes conversion of open warehouse and office space into an indoor recreation facility. The proposed facility will be occupying 42,000 square feet of the total approximately 142,800 square foot building. The CUP is necessary to establish the use. Access: Access to the site is taken from N. Gaudians Avenue and from E. Lanark Street, designated as collector roadways. Access to this site is consistent with the requirements set forth in UDC 11-3A-3. No other access points are proposed or approved with this application. Parking: Per UDC 11 -3C -6B all industrial districts require one space for every 2,000 square feet of gross floor area. The site is currently developed with a 142,800 square foot warehouse building, of which 42,000 square feet is proposed for the use. Based on the existing and planned square footage the site must provide a minimum of 21 parking stalls. The submitted site provides a total of 91 parking stalls. In addition, per UDC 11-3C-5, the applicant is responsible for providing bike parking on the site. The UDC requires the installation of one bicycle parking space for every 25 proposed vehicle parking stalls. The applicant is required to install four (4) bicycle parking stalls on site. Business Operation: The applicant has indicated that the hours of operation for the business will be Monday -Thursday 3-8PM, Friday - Saturday 10AM-11 PM and Sunday 10AM-8PM. The hours of operation are mostly evenings and weekends and will only overlap for two hours with the other business located on the property. The applicant has indicated that the two adjacent businesses are unmanned warehouses, so parking for the facility should not be an issue. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review: The purpose of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) approval is to ensure that all construction, alterations and/or the establishment of a new use complies with all of the provisions of the UDC before any work on the structure is started and/or the use is established (UDC 11 -5B -1A). To ensure that all of the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B are complied with, the Applicant will be required to obtain CZC approval from the Planning Department prior to establishment of the new use. All improvements must be installed prior to occupancy. Written Testimony: None Staff Recommendation: Approval Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0046, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 18, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0046, as presented during the hearing on May 18, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0046 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) item #4D: Franklin Daycare (H-2017.0047) Application(s): ➢ Conditional Use Permit Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 0.14 of an acre of land, zoned R-8, located at 4657 N. Price Avenue. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning: The property is developed with a single family detached home, zoned R-8 (medium density residential). History: • In 2005, the property was annexed and zoned R-8 and preliminary platted as part of Ambercreek Subdivision. • In 2014, the property was granted final plat approval (FP -14-012) for Ambercreek Subdivision No. 2. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Medium Density Residential Summary of Request: The request is for a conditional use permit to operate a daycare group in a 2,620 square foot home for up to 12 children in an R-8 zoning district. The applicant has indicated that she will be using 1,066 square feet of the home for her daycare. The UDC allows for up to 6 children in a "daycare family" with an accessory use permit in the R-8 zoning district. To allow up to 12 children in a "daycare group", the R-8 zoning district requires a conditional use permit. One of the main reasons for this distinction is the increased number of vehicle trips for the "daycare group." There are specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-9 that apply to daycare facilities that the applicant shall comply with. The applicant shall pave the 3 stalls as shown on the site plan. Specific Use Standards: The proposed use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-9, Daycare Facility. A. General standards for all child daycare and adult care uses, including the classifications of daycare center; daycare, family; and daycare, group: 1. In determining the type of daycare facility, the total number of children at the facility at one time, including the operator's children, is the determining factor. The applicant is proposing to care for up to 12 children and therefore is classified as a daycare group. 2. On site vehicle pick up, parking and turnaround areas shall be provided to ensure safe discharge and pick up of clients. The home has a three car garage and also has three stalls on the driveway to accommodate drop off and pick up of children. The proposed use will increase the number of trips to and from the home and therefore the UDC requires additional off-street parking. 3. The decision making body shall specify the maximum number of allowable clients and hours of operation as conditions of approval. See Conditions of Approval in Exhibit B. 4. Upon tentative approval of the application by the director or commission for a daycare center facility, the applicant or owner shall provide proof of criminal background checks and fire inspection certificates as required by title 39, chapter 11, Idaho Code. Said proof shall be provided prior to issuance of occupancy. The applicant or owner shall comply with all state of Idaho and department of health and welfare requirements for daycare facilities. The applicant will comply with this standard. 5. In residential districts or uses adjoining an adjacent residence, the hours of operation shall be between six o'clock (6:00) A.M. and eleven o'clock (11:00) P.M. This standard may be modified through approval of a conditional use permit. The applicant will comply with this standard. The applicant shall not exceed the maximum number of clients as stated in the approved permit or as stated in this title, whichever is more restrictive. The applicant will comply with this standard. B. Additional standards for daycare facilities that serve children: 1. All outdoor play areas shall be completely enclosed by minimum six foot (6) nonscalable fences to secure against exit/entry by small children and to screen abutting properties. The outdoor play area is enclosed with a six-foot non -scalable cedar fence on both the north and south property lines. The applicant currently has a four foot fence on the rear of the property and has indicated that this fence will be altered to meet the required 6 feet in height and that vegetation will be planted along the western property line to discourage children from climbing. With submittal of the certificate ofzoning compliance application, the applicant shall provide details of the 6 foot non -scalable fence. Certificate of Zoning Compliance: Due to the fact that the proposed daycare center use is within an existing building and no site or exterior building modifications are proposed a Certificate of Zoning Compliance application will not be required to commence the proposed use on this site. All interior modifications (tenant improvements) associated with the daycare center use must receive all required permits and inspections from the Building Division of the Community Development Department prior to operation of the daycare center. Staff recommends approval of the proposed CUP with the conditions listed in Exhibit B. NOTE: The City has adopted a local amendment to the international building code (IBC) that does not require a change in occupancy of the home if it is to operate as a daycare facilities for twelve or fewer children. Because the occupancy of the home is not changing from residential to non-residential, the parking for non-residential uses doesn't apply. However, staff has concerns with the limited parking on the site and is recommending that the applicant pave the gravel area on the east side the driveway in accord with UDC standards. standards. The applicant anticipates that the arrival of the children will be staggered so that the provided parking both on the driveway and the additional off-street stall will be sufficient. Written Testimony: Leslie Halvorson - Fencing Staff Recommendation: Approval Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0047, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 18, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0047, as presented during the hearing on May 18, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0047 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) item #4E: My First Steps Daycare (H-2017-0054) Application(s): ➢ Conditional Use Permit Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 0.15 of an acre of land, zoned R-8, located at 3545 S. Pompei Ave. Adjacent Land Use & Zoning: This site is surrounded by existing residential properties and vacant/undeveloped land, zoned R-8. History: This property is platted as Lot 3, Block 11 of Tuscany Village Subdivision No. 2 Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: MDR Summary of Request: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a group daycare for up to 12 children, between the ages of 6 weeks to 6 years old, in the R-8 zoning district. The applicant is required to comply with the specific use standards for daycare facilities, which include but are not limited to, on-site vehicle pick-up, parking and turnaround areas; hours of operation not exceeding 6am to 11 pm; provision of a 6' tall non -scalable fence around play area; and background check and Fire Dept. inspection. Written Testimony: Darya Krautsova, Applicant — in agreement w/staff report Staff Recommendation: Approval w/conditions in Exhibit B of the staff report Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0054, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 18, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0054, as presented during the hearing on May 18, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0054 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) item #4F: Geddes Subdivision (H-2017.0041) Application(s): ➢ Annexation & Zoning ➢ Preliminary Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 2.08 acres of land, zoned RUT in Ada County, located off the southeast corner of N. Blackcat & W. Ustick Roads. Adjacent Land Use & Zoning: North: Rural & urban SFR properties in Klamath Basin Subdivision, zoned RUT in Ada County and R-4 East: SFR properties in Staten Park Subdivision, zoned R-4 South: SFR properties in Ashford Greens & Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision No. 9, zoned R-4 West: Rural residential property, zoned RUT in Ada County History: None Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: LDR (low density residential) Summary of Request: The applicant requests approval of annexation and zoning of 2.08 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district. A "step up" in density is requested from LDR (low density, 3 or fewer units/acre) to MDR (medium density, 3-8 units/acre) as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan without an amendment to the FLUM. A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 10 SFR building lots and 4 common lots on 2.08 acres of land in the proposed R-8 zoning district. The gross density of the proposed development is 4.8 dwelling units/acre with a net density of 8.9 units/acre which is consistent with the requested step up in density if approved. The minimum property size is 4,034 s.f. with an average lot size of 4,960 s.f. Access is proposed via the extension of a local street, N. Geddes Avenue, currently stubbed at the SWC of the site. A stub street is proposed to the west for future extension and interconnectivity. Because a roundabout is planned at the Blackcat/Ustick intersection, staff was concerned about how the properties to the north & west could redevelop in the future and requested the applicant submit a concept plan addressing this, which he did. The concept plan provides access to these properties and appears to meet UDC standards & Fire Dept. requirements. A common driveway is proposed for access to the 3 homes at the southeast corner of the development. The applicant is proposing 0.11 of an acre of common area adjacent to the cul-de-sac at the NEC of the site along the Eight Mile Lateral, which runs along the east boundary of the site. The UDC does not require qualified open space & site amenities to be provided for development that is below 5 acres in size; however, because the applicant is requesting approval of a step up in density, staff recommends a qualifying site amenity such as a picnic area with tables, benches and a shade structure or other qualified amenity, is provided as a provision of the development agreement. The applicant also requests Council approval of a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6 to leave the Eightmile Lateral open and not pipe it as required by the UDC due to its large capacity; the applicant guesstimates it would take at least a 48" pipe to tile the facility. Conceptual elevations were submitted for future homes within this development as shown. Building materials consist of horizontal & vertical siding with stone veneer accents. Written Testimony: Matt Schultz, Applicant's Representative (in agreement w/staff report) Staff Recommendation: Approval contingent upon Council's approval of a "step up" in density as requested. Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of File Number H- 2017-0041, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 18, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial to the City Council of File Number H-2017- 0041, as presented during the hearing on May 18, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0041 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: May 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 3A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approve minutes of 5/4/17 pz meeting MEETING NOTES CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 4, 2017 Page 42 of 43 MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT. Fitzgerald: Okay. Any further comments? Commissioner Cassanelli, do you want to make your motion again, sir. Cassanelli: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion to approve the 2017 UDC Text Amendment H-2017-0044. Baird: Mr. Chairman, just a note of order. We are not approving -- we are recommending approval to City Council. Need that motion to recommend approval. Fitzgerald: Amen. Do we have a second after that? Bernt: I will second that. Fitzgerald: Thank you. I have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Thank you very much. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT, Fitzgerald: If there is no further business to come before the Commission, I would entertain one more motion. Commissioner Perreault. Perreault: Everybody looking at me? I make a motion to close our hearing this evening. Do I need to give any other information? Fitzgerald: No, ma'am. Yearsley: Second. Fitzgerald: I have a motion and a second to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Thank you. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:43 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.) APPROVED H NDA McCARVEL - CHAIRMAN DATE APPROVED Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 4, 2017 Page 43 of 43 ATTEST: ,� i� �OO"r C. JAY COLES - CITY CLERK �$,e**#,-aVLA'tuD.4 ucoty -f ����T9 ow IDANO SE TF�o'/ar 7REASUP�'V Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: May 18, 2017 ITEM TITLE: Bannock Ridge (AZ PP) ITEM NUMBER: 4A PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0050 Public Hearing - Annexation and Zoning of 9.42 acres of land with an R-4 zoning district and Preliiminary Plat approval consisting of 31 building lots and 6 common lots on 13.57 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district by Two C Development, LLC - 2940, 3101 & 3155 S. Mesa Way MEETING NOTES CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: May 18, 2017 Item # Project Number: H-2017-0050 Project Name: Bannock Ridge Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (Y/N) Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: May 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4B PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0052 ITEM TITLE: Meridian Meats CUP Public Hearing - CUP approval to expand an existing nonconforming use (Food Products Processing) for the purpose of constructing a 673 square foot addition in the O- T zoning district by Meridian Meat and Sausage, Inc. - 119 E. Bower Street MEETING NOTES ( 7) / � I ('�-o CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: May 18, 2017 Item # Project Number: H-2017-0052 Project Name: Please print your name L Meridian Meats For I Against I Neutral Do you wish to testifv (YIN) Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: May 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4C PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0046 ITEM TITLE: Urban Air CUP Public Hearing - CUP to operate an indoor recreation facility in an I -L zoning district by LimitLess Entertainment, LLC - 3820 & 3876 E. Lanark Street MEETING NOTES �4 C) -L,-j (t:: �' ( � 6 / SC //It �P �clL FPC L' s f r �/ I CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: May 18, 2017 Item # 4C Project Number: H-2017-0046 Project Name: Urban Air Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testifv (Y/N) Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: May 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 4D PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0047 ITEM TITLE: Franklin Daycare CUP Public Hearing - CUP to for a daycare group for up to 12 children in an R-8 zoning district by Donna Franklin - 4657 N. Price Avenue MEETING NOTES Appr-Dve,4— Pre 1�Ccre nit<</11 s r rn CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: May 18, 2017 Item # Project Number: H-2017-0047 Project Name: Franklin Daycare Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (Y/N) I anVi I c A CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: May 18, 2017 Item # 4E Project Number: H-2017-0054 Project Name: My First Steps Daycare Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (Y/N) Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: May 18, 2017 ITEM TITLE: My First Steps Daycare CUP ITEM NUMBER: 4E PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0054 Public Hearing - Conditional Use permit approval for a group daycare for up to 12 children on 0.15 of an acre in an R-8 zoning district by Darya Kraufsova - 3545 S. Pompei Avenue MEETING NOTES CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION C'-"- D DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: May 18, 2017 ITEM TITLE: Geddes Subdivision AZ PP ITEM NUMBER: 4F PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0041 Public Hearing - Annexation and Zoning of 2.08 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district and Preliminary Plat approval consisting of 10 building lots and 4 common lots on 2.08 acres of land in an R-8 zoning district by Schultz Development - SE of the W. Ustick Road and N. Black Cat Road intersection II T]1:4 =11101►CH01 Is] I*I 6,cc A -P P I/Irr 40 0/c- Sch�LJ-0- Qr- -�;� � fay CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS V CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: May 18, 2017 Item # 4F Project Number: H-2017-0041 Project Name: Geddes Subdivision Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (Y/N) 1