The URL can be used to link to this page

2017-04-18Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, April 18, 2017 – Page 1 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 1. City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 6:00 PM 1. Roll-Call Attendance X Anne Little Roberts X Joe Borton O Ty Palmer O Keith Bird __X___ Genesis Milam __X___ Luke Cavener X Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Community Invocation by Michael Pearson, Meridian Seventh Day Adventist Church 4. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted as amended 5. Consent Agenda Approved A. Approve Minutes of April 4, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes B. Approve Minutes of April 11, 2017 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes C. Final Order for TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 (H-2017-0024) by SCS Brighton, LLC Located Southeast Corner of W. Franklin Road and S. Ten Mile Road D. Final Order for Silverwater South (H-2017-0025) by Trilogy Development Located South of E. Victory Road Midway Between S. Meridian and S. Locust Grove Roads E. Development Agreement for Tree Farm Subdivision (H-2016-0128) with Drew Eggers (owner) and M3 Companies, LLC (Developer) located at 4740 W. Chinden Blvd., in the SW 1/4 Section 22, Township 4N., Range 1W F. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order of Denial for a Request for Reconsideration for the Tree Farm Subdivision (H-2016-0128) G. Final Plat Modification for Avebury Subdivision (H-2017-0037) By AD800, LLC CITY COUNCIL REGULAR AMENDED MEETING AGENDA Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, April 18, 2017 – Page 2 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. H. Final Plat Modification for Vicenza No 3. (H-2017-0038) by Cottonwood Development, LLC Located West of McMillian Road Between North Black Cat Road and North Ten Mile Road I. Final Plat Modification for Vicenza Subdivision No 4. (H-2017-0039) By Cottonwood Development LLC J. Final Plat for Volterra Heights No. 3 (H-2017-0023) by Cottonwood Development Located South Side of W. McMillan Road and West of N. Ten Mile Road K. Final Plat for Vicenza Subdivision No. 5 (H-2017-0022) by Cottonwood Development Located North Side of W. McMillan Road and East of N. Black Cat Road L. Final Plat for Vicenza Subdivision No. 6 (H-2017-0021) by Cottonwood Development Located North Side of W. McMillan Road and East of N. Black Cat Road M. Final Plat Modification for Volterra Heights Subdivision No. 2. (H-2017-0040) By Cottonwood Development, LLC Located North of West McMillian Road Between North Black Cat Road and North Ten Mile Road N. Final Plat for Hill's Century Farm Subdivision No 6. (H-2017-0033) By Brighton Investments Located South of East Amity Road and East of South Eagle Road O. Final Plat for Paramount No. 33 (H-2017-0030) by Brighton Land Holdings Located Approximately 740 Feet South of W. Chinden Boulevard on the West Side of N. Meridian Road P. Final Plat for Fall Creek Subdivision No. 4 (H-2017-0034) By Thomas Coleman, Toll ID I, LLC Located on the East Side of South Linder Road, Approximately 1/3 Mile South of West Overland Road Q. Final Plat for Heron Ridge Estates Subdivision No 2. (H-2017-0035) By The Ewing Company Located at North of Chinden Boulevard, South of the Phyllis Canal and Approximately a 1/2 Mile East of North Black Cat Road R. Resolution No. 17-2004A: Amended Clerk's Office Fee Schedule S. Idaho Power Utility Easement T. Citadel Storage Water Main Easement U. Newton’s Nook Water Main Easement Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, April 18, 2017 – Page 3 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. V. Newton’s Nook No.1 Release of Water Easement W. Newton’s Nook No. 2 Release of Water Main Easement X. St. Ignatius Release of Water and Sewer Main Easement Y. St. Ignatius Sewer Easement Z. St. Ignatius Water Easement AA. Verado No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement BB. Approve Finance Department to Pay Vendor Payments of $956,198.16 CC. Amended onto agenda: Final Order for Maddyn Subdivision (H-2017-0029) by A Team Land Consultants Located West Side of N. Meridian Road, South of E. Ustick Road and North of W. Sedgewick Drive DD. Amended onto agenda: Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for TM Crossing (H-2017-0027) by Brighton Investments, et al., Located Northeast Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road 6. Items Moved From the Consent Agenda None 7. Community Items/Presentations A. Swearing in of New Police Officers B. Empty Chair Project C. Community Development: CDBG Program Updates for Program Year 2016 and Program Year 2017 8. Action Items Land Use Public Hearing Process: After the Public Hearing is opened the staff report will be presented by the assigned City planner. Following Staff’s report the applicant has up to 15 minutes to present their application. Each member of the public may provide testimony up to 3 minutes or if they are representing a larger group, such as a Homeowners Association, they are allowed 10 minutes. The applicant is then allowed 10 additional minutes to respond to the public’s comments. No additional public testimony is taken once the public hearing is closed. The City Council may move to continue the item for additional information or vote to approve or deny the item with or without changes as presented. The Mayor is not a member of the City Council and pursuant to Idaho Code does not vote on public hearing items, unless to break a tie vote. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, April 18, 2017 – Page 4 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. A. Public Hearing for Meridian Meadows Senior Community (H-2017-0011) by Giza Development/Michael Wright Located 2662 E. Magic View Drive Approved 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 5.28 Acres of Land with an L -O Zoning District 2. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Nursing/Residential Care Facility in an L-O Zoning District 9. Department Reports A. Police Department: Staffing Study B. Police Department: Consolidated Records Management System Agreement Approved C. Police Department: Memorandum of Understanding between Boise Police, Garden City Police and City of Meridian Police Approved D. Parks and Recreation: FY2017 Budget Amendment for Movie Night Projector Purchase Not-to-Exceed $10,000 Approved 10. Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 17-1725: An Ordinance (H-2017-0009) Amending Meridian City Code as Codified at Title 11, Section 3 Entitled Unified Development Code of the Meridian City Code Pertaining to Sign Requirements; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing for an effective date. Approved B. Ordinance No. 17-1726: An Ordinance (H-2016-0128) for the Re-zone of a Parcel of Land Situated within the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; Establishing and Determining and the Land Use Zoning Classification from the R-2 (Low Density Residential) to R-4(Medium-Low Density Residential)(10.17 acres); R-8 (Medium Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium-Low Density Residential)(33.84 acres); R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium-Low Density Residential)(.25 acres); C-C (Community Business) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(.27 acres); and R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(154 s.f.) zoning districts, in the Meridian City Code; Providing that Copies of this Ordinance Shall be Files with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; And Providing Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, April 18, 2017 – Page 5 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. for a Summary of the Ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; And Providing an Effective Date. Approved 11. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(d) To Consider Records that are Exempt from Disclosure as Provided in Chapter 1, Title 74, Idaho Code Into Executive Session at 9:01pm Out of Executive Session at 9:38pm 12. Future Meeting Topics Adjourned at 9:39pm Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 18, 2017, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Joe Borton, Genesis Milam, Luke Cavener, and Anne Little Roberts. Members Absent: Keith Bird, Ty Palmer. Others Present: Bill Nary, C.Jay Coles, Jaycee Holman, Bill Parsons, Josh Beach, Jeff Lavey, Burle Stokes, David Jones, Clint Dolsby, Colin Moss and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Roll call. X_ Anne Little Roberts X _ _Joe Borton Ty Palmer __ Keith Bird X__ Genesis Milam __X__ Lucas Cavener X Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: Well, I would like to welcome you all to our City Council meeting. It's always nice to see friendly faces in the audience. As well we love to see our public safety personnel here and look forward to seeing our newest members sworn in. So, welcome to our City Council meeting. For the record it is April 18th. It's 6:00 p.m. We will start with roll call attendance, Mr. Clerk. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance De Weerd: Thank you. If you will all rise and join us in the pledge to our flag. Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation by Michael Pearson, Meridian Seventh Day Adventist Church De Weerd: Item No. 3 is our community invocation. Tonight we will be led by Pastor Michael Pearson. He is with the Meridian Seventh-day Adventist Church. If you will all join us in the community invocation or take this as a moment of reflection. Thank you for joining us. Pearson: Father in Heaven, we want to thank you for those in our community who serve on City Council, the Councilors, the Mayor, the men in uniform, the ladies in uniform, who serve with little recognition and especially we lift up those who will be joining those ranks this evening and ask your blessing on them , too. We thank Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 2 of 65 you for the willingness of yours to meet with us in every situation, in Jesus' name, amen. Item 4 : Adoption of the Agenda De Weerd: Thank you, Pastor Pearson. Item No. 4 is adoption of the agenda. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: On the Consent Agenda we will be adding Item CC, final order for Maiden Subdivision and DD, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for TM Crossing. For item -- Ordinance on Item 10-A, the proposed ordinance is 17-1725. And on 10-B the proposed ordinance is 17-1726. And with those amendments I would move that we adopt agenda. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as read . All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Item 5: Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of April 4, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes B. Approve Minutes of April 11, 2017 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes C. Final Order for TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 (H-2017-0024) by SCS Brighton, LLC Located Southeast Corner of W. Franklin Road and S. Ten Mile Road D. Final Order for Silverwater South (H-2017-0025) by Trilogy Development Located South of E. Victory Road Midway Between S. Meridian and S. Locust Grove Roads E. Development Agreement for Tree Farm Subdivision (H- 2016-0128) with Drew Eggers (owner) and M3 Companies, LLC (Developer) located at 4740 W. Chinden Blvd., in the SW 1/4 Section 22, Township 4N., Range 1W Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 3 of 65 F. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order of Denial for a Request for Reconsideration for the Tree Farm Subdivision (H-2016-0128) G. Final Plat Modification for Avebury Subdivision H-2017-0037) By AD800, LLC H. Final Plat Modification for Vicenza No 3 . (H-2017- 0038 ) by Cottonwood Development, LLC Located West of McMillian Road Between North Black Cat Road and North Ten Mile Road I. Final Plat Modification for Vicenza Subdivision No 4. H-2017-0039 ) By Cottonwood Development LLC J. Final Plat for Volterra Heights No. 3 (H-2017-0023) by Cottonwood Development Located South Side of W. McMillan Road and West of N. Ten Mile Road K. Final Plat for Vicenza Subdivision No. 5 (H-2017-0022) by Cottonwood Development Located North Side of W. McMillan Road and East of N. Black Cat Road L. Final Plat for Vicenza Subdivision No. 6 (H-2017-0021) by Cottonwood Development Located North Side of W. McMillan Road and East of N. Black Cat Road M. Final Plat Modification for Volterra Heights Subdivision No. 2. (H-2017-0040 ) By Cottonwood Development, LLC Located North of West McMillian Road Between North Black Cat Road and North Ten Mile Road N. Final Plat for Hill's Century Farm Subdivision No 6 . (H- 2017-0033) By Brighton Investments Located South of East Amity Road and East of South Eagle Road O. Final Plat for Paramount No. 33 (H-2017-0030) by Brighton Land Holdings Located Approximately 740 Feet South of W. Chinden Boulevard on the West Side of N. Meridian Road P. Final Plat for Fall Creek Subdivision No . 4 ( H-2017-0034) By Thomas Coleman, Toll IDI, LLC Located on the East Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 4 of 65 Side of South Linder Road, Approximately 1/3 Mile South of West Overland Road Q. Final Plat f or Heron Ridge Estates Subdivision No 2. (H- 2017-0035 ) By The Ewing Company Located at North of Chinden Boulevard, South of the Phyllis Canal and Approximately a 1/2 Mile East of North Black Cat Road R. Resolution No. 17-2004A: Amended Cl erk's Office Fee Schedule S. Idaho Power Utility Easement T. Citadel Storage Water Main Easement U. Newton’s Nook Water Main Easement V. Newton’s Nook No.1 Release of Water Easement W. Newton’s Nook No. 2 Release of Water Main Easement X. St. Ignatius Release of Water and Sewer Main Easement Y. St. Ignatius Sewer Easement Z. St. Ignatius Water Easement AA. Verado No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement BB. Approve Finance Department to Pay Vendor Payments of 956,198.16 De Weerd: Item 5 is our Consent Agenda. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: On the Consent Agenda, Item R is resolution number 17 -2004A. And with the additions of CC and DD I would move that we approve the Consent Agenda as published and for the Clerk to sign and Mayor -- or Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Cavener: Second. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 5 of 65 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda as printed. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, absent; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Item 6: Items Moved From the Consent Agenda De Weerd: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. Item 7: Community Items/Presentations A. Swearing in of New Police Officers De Weerd: So, we will move right into our community presentations and start with the swearing in of our new police officers. Lavey: Madam Mayor, Council, thank you for this opportunity. Probably one of my greatest honors as police chief is being able to swear in new officers and introduce them to our community and that's what we have in store tonight . So, for the family members that are in the audience, this is going to be semi-formal, but informal in the point that this is about you and your loved ones and we want you to get pictures and feel free to come up and -- and do whatever you need to to get that awesome picture for -- for future. When the officers -- when I call your name I want you to come up here, line up to my left and in -- kind of in order that I call you, so I don't get confused. So, Jacob, if you would come forward. De Weerd: Chief, do you want to turn the podium around so you're facing the families and our public? Lavey: I will do that. As soon as I get everybody up here, then, I will do that. De Weerd: Okay. Lavey: Kyle come forward. Danelle. Lane. Joshua. And Nick. So, the first thing I'd like to do is do the official swearing in ceremony. So, if the officers could raise your right hand and repeat after me. I, state your name, do solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the constitutional laws of the state of Idaho and the laws and ordinances of the City of Meridian. That I will abide by the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics and the policies and Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 6 of 65 procedures of the Meridian Police Department. I will obey all lawful orders and directives from those appointed over me and that I will, to the best of my ability, faithfully discharge all the duties of police officer in and for the City of Meridian, state of Idaho, so help me God. Officers sworn.) Lavey: Congratulations. Madam Mayor and Council, as stated before, if you would allow me the opportunity to introduce these fine men and women to -- to you and to our community this evening it would be my pleasure. Jacob Pele. Jacob graduated with a bachelor's degree in sociology from Idaho State University in May of 2013. He was a member of the Idaho State football team from 2009 to 2014 and was a two-year starter as a linebacker at the 3X all be -- all Big Sky all academic team selection. He was recently married in August of 2016 to his wife Leah. Shortly after graduating he started working for the Pocatello Police Department where he worked for two years before a lateral transfer to the Meridian Police Department. Welcome. De Weerd: Go Bengals. There you go. Different leagues. Come on. Lavey: We are already starting football and it hasn't even started. Kyle Mikoski. Kyle brings with him nine years of experience . He worked as a police officer for three years for the San Diego Police Department in San Diego , California. He also served six years as a police officer and a K-9 handler for the Murietta Police Department in Murrieta, California, before he decided to lateral transfer up here to Meridian. Welcome, Kyle. Danelle. Danelle Kenny brings with her just over two and a half years of experience where she worked as a deputy sheriff for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office in Los Angeles , California. You all know that that's probably the biggest sheriff's office in the United States . She started working in the jail and worked really hard until she got an opportunity to work the road and the minute she got the chance to work the road she decided to come up here. So, congratulations. Danelle's sister also works for the Police Department, so that's been kind of interesting sometimes. Lane Ahl. Lane brings with him almost four years of experience where he has worked as a police officer for Hemet PD in Hemet, California. Welcome aboard, Lane. Joshua. Joshua Shackelford spent one year as a ground tactical team member of the State of California counter drug task force. He, then, served three years as a police officer for the Modesto PD police department in Modesto, California. Welcome aboard, Joshua. Nick Allex has served nine and a half years full-time active-duty United States Army. He is currently serving as a captain team leader of the special operations in the US Army Reserve. He is currently attending Idaho POST as a recruit and welcome aboard and also thank you for your service to our country. Mayor and Council, that is our sixth newest members. As you know this comes in phases and I will probably be in front of you fairly soon, but these are our newest and they are out there working on the streets right now and we would just like to Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 7 of 65 welcome them aboard and for the family members come -- please come forward, take a picture, do whatever you need to do to make sure you got that perfect picture. So, I stand for any comment. And for the bashful family members that I don't want to come forward, I will go out in the lobby, we can all take some pictures out there. I'm sure you don't want to stay for the rest of the -- rest of the meeting. De Weerd: Oh, it's really interesting. Lavey: Some of us will be here all night. De Weerd: Before you clear the room, to our new officers and your families, we appreciate you joining our city family. You have joined in what -- I think I speak on behalf of everyone sitting up here -- the best in the state, if not the nation. We love our law enforcement officers and -- and staff and you joined a great team to the families, we know that we ask a lot of you in supporting your loved one, but let I just wanted to let you know that we stand with you in worrying about your loved one every day they are on duty and that we pray for their safe return every night or after every shift. So, thank you for supporting one of our newest members of our -- our police department and -- and for joining our family at the City of Meridian as well. So, thank you so much for being here for this important event. Thank you. B. Empty Chair Project De Weerd: Okay. Item 7-B is our Empty -- a presentation on the Empty Chair Project by Matthew Shapiro. Thank you for joining us. Shapiro: Thank you, Mayor de Weerd and Council Members. My name is Matthew Shapiro. I am the director of the Boise Commons, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization. Fairly new. And so I'm going to introduce what we are about and, then, the Empty Chair Project and appreciate the opportunity to talk about that, so -- can you all see the -- De Weerd: Yes, we can. Shapiro: Okay. Great. Okay. Oh. Okay. So, the Boise Commons, as I said, is a fairly unique nonprofit organization. We are a catalyst for community building, civic development, and participatory governance. So, our mission is to foster an inclusive and empowering civic life among the citizenry in Boise and the greater Treasure Valley. We are all about engaging citizens more in their public life and what's going on, to be able to deal with issues, to talk together, to overcome polarization and all those things we need to work on. Active since 2015 and the founding members are myself, Jerome Mapp, and Dean Gunderson. So, I have a little bit of information on them on the next -- the next slide. So, I have been Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 8 of 65 involved in community projects in Boise for about 24 years in many different arenas. Education, neighborhood development and other things. Jerome Mapp, former city council member Boise and a planner. And Dean is an urban -- urban designer. We were all brought together by this interest in -- in citizen participation and engagement. So, our scope of interest at the Boise Commons is very wide . Helping people become more comfortable with dialogue. Helping people deal with complexity of public issues and focus on the deep roots of those issues. Helping surface assumptions, create visions and solutions together, help overcome political polarization and encourage systemic approaches to solutions and encourage long-term thinking, among other things. So, some of the things we have been working on. We did a state of Boise's neighborhood associations study last year, survey and report on strengths and weaknesses and needs of all these associations. We have been working with the neighborhood associations to build a collaboration framework, so they can be more effective and learn from each other. The neighborhood game, it's more of a fun community building activity that we did a couple years ago. Dealing with complexity in the public arena. So, we are introducing some new tools and processes about dealing with complex issues. The first one we are going to work on has to do with dependents on the automobile in the Treasure Valley. Survey of the youngest voting age citizens. This was conducted among seniors in the high schools last year to get a sense of how they see voting and civic participation. Really interesting study. Meeting the other. Bringing together people with different viewpoints to get to know each other as human beings. Proposal to the school district in Boise to build a civic education curriculum and we are about to pilot the use of an online platform called Considerit for improved public debate on an issue of concern. I will give you a little preview what that looks like in case it happens to be of interest down the road. And, then, what we came here to talk about today is the Empty Chair, encouraging long-term thinking and inclusivity in public decisions. So, the Empty Chair has been used as a symbol before. We didn't invent that. This -- this empty chair represents POWs, MIAs, Holocaust -- those who were lost in Holocaust. This example is earthquake -- those who died in an earthquake in -- I believe this is New Zealand. So, this is our Empty Chair placard and it simply says this Empty Chair represents future generations who are affected by what we say and do here today. I brought a couple of examples. It's a laminated placard and designed to be -- to be affixed easily to any chair and we can provide those in any number of colors if there is an interest in that. So, the idea is simply to set aside an empty chair at your meetings, place it where it will be somewhat conspicuous. Doesn’t have to be in the middle of the room. Display the placard. Although that may not even be necessary, because when I learned about this practice, it was at a conference where they were used to having an empty chair in the middle of the meetings and there was no placard and no need for it, because everyone understood that that -- that's what it was for. But we designed the placards to sort of make it easier for people to understand why is there this empty chair? Why is it reserved? And so -- so reasons why. A reminder. A reminder to consider the future, those who are not in the room or not born yet or simply not Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 9 of 65 present in the conversation. Expressing your leadership. We don't know if anybody else in the country actually does this as a practice. It's likely that somebody does, but we are not aware. We didn't borrow that idea from -- from other cities. And encourage others who are present in meetings to think about those who are not present and to think long term as well. So, it's really just a very simple campaign, a simple reminder -- not that it's already happening, but it helps and I think -- and that is it on the -- on the placard. I do have a yellow and blue and in case -- I will leave those with you. I also have some for you -- I made seven copies, so I think that's enough for all the Council Members and the Mayor. De Weerd: If you will give it to our clerk. Thank you, Matthew. Shapiro: A little souvenir. So, before I close that, are there any questions or comments about the Empty Chair at all? De Weerd: Council, any questions? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Shapiro, thanks for your presentation, this unique idea, one that's been done all over the country. You have outlined a lot of the work that you have done in the city Boise. I'm just curious if this is something that is currently occurring in Boise city hall and, if so, where did they place that chair. Shapiro: Yeah. We have reached out to Boise city council and I know some of the members there. We have not heard back. We are -- we are going to go remind them and see if we can do that. So, this is the first invitation we have gotten, actually, from a local government entity, so -- Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mrs. Milam. Milam: Well, you picked the right colors, first of all. De Weerd: I know. Milam: I think this is -- I love the idea. We are constantly -- it is something that we -- up here have stated many times of be careful of the decisions we make and the effect that it's going to have on not only future councils, but future generations and -- I mean that's what we try to make every decision with that in mind . So, I think having that symbolism and that representation is -- I think it's a great idea. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 10 of 65 The logistics of it, I'm not sure how that will work, but -- but I really do like the idea. Thank you for bringing it to us. Shapiro: Thanks. So, the last thing I was going to show you is Considerit. We discovered this sort of by accident. It's been used heavily in Seattle. It's -- because we are interested in helping elevate the level of public dialogue about public issues and engage people more effectively and it's free , so we thought, huh, let's pilot the use of this here. We have just set up the first one and it's something that would affect everybody in the county, this particular issue that we are thinking of going with initially -- is the issue of local control of roads and ACHD, which we don't take any particular position on, but it's one that comes up now and then. So, we thought what if we pilot the use of this tool to explore that issue, to invite everybody to -- to express an opinion about it and, then, the great thing about it is it -- it lets people describe why they support -- are for something or against something and -- and those reasons can be rated and it's moderated as well, so that it remains very civil if you carefully conduct it. So, we will be -- we will be working on that soon and that's something I would highlight that for you. It's just something that might interest the City of Meridian . So, that's it. De Weerd: Well, thank you, Matthew. We appreciated receiving your information and request for coming and presenting your ideas and we are looking for better ways to encourage dialogue and feedback and -- and remind not just us, as you pointed out, but all those involved in -- in those contentious sometimes topics that it's for the good of the whole -- Shapiro: Right. De Weerd: -- and it is for not just the decision that it impacts today, it will impact our long term as well. So, those are good reminders to have. Shapiro: Thank you. De Weerd: So, thank you for joining us. Anything further from Council? Thank you. C. Community Development: CDBG Program Updates for Program Year 2016 and Program Year 2017 De Weerd: Okay. And last aspect here in our Community Presentations is our Community Development Block Grant and, Chris, I will turn this over to you. Pope: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council . I really like to be at this podium for some reason, so rather than sitting over there from the side, I'm going to address you straight on. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 11 of 65 De Weerd: All right. Pope: Regardless of that, I don't have a lot of -- I guess not much more than a bunch of updates to give you guys today in an effort to be a little bit more accountable and transparent with you and the community on what we are doing in this program, I wanted to come before you today and kind of talk about what's going on in the projects with our CDBG program and the applications that we received for funding -- for consideration for funding, rather, for this upcoming program year. For those in the room and those who may be watching somewhere else, the CDBG program that we have here -- CDBG stands for Community Development Block Grants, which is a program in which we receive federal funding from the Department -- the US Department of Housing and Urban Development in order to meet some social services and community development needs here in Meridian. So, as we -- for those, again, who don't -- who aren't as familiar with this program as we go forward, this is highlighting some of the things that we already have going on in Meridian and some of the things we are looking at potentially funding as we go forward. So, first and foremost I wanted to just provide a basic update of what's happening. Is a list of nine of the projects that we have going on right now that spans multiple different program years, all funded in different ways. Some of the ones that I want to highlight are I think of particular importance -- the first one is the slum and blight plan that we have going on right now with the help of our consultant in JUB Engineers. We are currently out there assessing properties in various different parts of the city in order to determine what percentage of these properties would be considered slum -- in a slum area or a blight area and this is designed to help us kind of classify and open up some more doors for potential funding to an expansion of projects into these areas to meet some of the needs that exist. That's moving along quite well. The project should be completed in -- at the latest by the end of June and we will have some kind of presentation of that plan to you, to give you an idea of what's actually going on in your constituencies here in terms of the state of their properties here in Meridian. In addition we have two programs we are partnering with Neighborworks and the Boise City-Ada County Housing Authority who help to provide down payment, closing costs, and principal buy down assistance funds to those who are looking at buying a home for a first time and who don't quite have all the funds there. In addition we have the senior resource guide that we were able to just get completed and printed and hopefully distributed here soon , if not already, to provide those senior citizens in the community with a very clear record of what their options are to those resources here in Meridian. We have two years of a very large street light project that's going on throughout different sections of our community, particularly in areas that need the streetlights. They haven't had it for a while, so that's moving forward just great. The Meridian Food Bank, we have just approved -- you guys have just approved in the last couple of weeks the agreement to move forward with them and they have already started buying some food and distributing it using those funds. So, as usual we have partnered with them for almost I think a decade now since we started this program and they are Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 12 of 65 flying like usual. The scholarship program that we have been funding the last few years with the Boys & Girls Club to help low and moderate income students with whatever needs they may have in whatever way that the Boys & Girls Club can't help them. It's moving forward well. And, again, most of these -- I guess projects have been just approved by you recently, but I wanted to highlight them, because they are moving, they are happening. Funding has already been drawn down for most of these projects, even though it's only been technically legally allowed to be functional for the last couple of weeks. So, these partnerships are moving forward and changes are happening in the community. Lives are being affected because of the decision to move forward with these . One that's new that I did also want to provide I guess an update with is the emergency rental assistance program that we partnered with Jesse Tree on. Their -- their goal is, essentially, to provide one month's rent for those individuals who, for whatever reason, are facing eviction or some other kind of reason that they are getting kicked out of their apartment as an emergency. They have also recently just submitted some drawdowns for funds, so we know that that's going forward, that there is a need in the community and that we are partnering with a good organization that's helping to meet that need . The last thing that -- the last update that I want to talk about is an update on the Meridian Development Corporation's project to develop and design and put in some -- some sidewalks in the downtown area and this is part of the contact -- we wanted to come forward with this, because there is some complexity with this project that we want to make sure it's clear to everybody on the Council, Madam Mayor and Council Member Bird are heavily involved in this project with MDC, but we want to make sure that everybody else is clear as things move forward on this project. It's become a little bit more complicated than we had initially expected, but it seems to be moving forward. We had a great coordination meeting with -- with those involved in MDC this last week and clarified particular items in terms of the legal agreements and the compliance factors that are necessary for both the city and MDC to be following in order to be eligible for the use of these funds and everything seems to be moving forward very well. But there are some implications here and you guys have not yet seen the subrecipient agreement or approved one for this project and unless something changes dramatically within the next couple of weeks there will be an agreement on your desk to -- to prove through the consent agenda. But this project becomes a little more complicated because this year we are -- we are choosing through the agreement with MDC to fund just the design aspect of certain segments of sidewalk in the downtown area . That’s not the construction. It's just the design. But the way that HUD works with us through the CDBG program and federal requirements and regulations -- a project can't be closed out or completed or considered finished in any way until the construction has been completed. We can't start design without ever finishing the construction. At this point that means that moving forward and approving an agreement that highlights and funds a design project also is tying us one way or another to a commitment to fund the construction project to the future. And construction isn't the chief thing for things like this and we will discuss some of the options as we go forward, but we wanted to make sure it was on your table in Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 13 of 65 understanding that as we move forward with this project -- particularly this year with the design of these sidewalks, that there is recognition that at least for the next year, if not the next two or three years, these projects -- Council is, in essence, committing to also found construction monies for this project. MDC has put forward some applications in particular for this next program year, which I'm going to get into here in a second, so you can know exactly what they are asking for, what's required, and what impact it might have on our overall CDBG budget. But I do kind of want to pause there and ask if there are questions, comments, concerns about this, because it's not often we come forward with projects and say get really excited about it, get all the pieces moving, only to realize that this might be a large multi-year funding commitment and we want to make sure that's transparent and understood by everybody and if there are concerns, questions, or comments I would invite them right now on that note. De Weerd: Well -- and I think it's probably important to give some context to it as well. The planning staff did work up some -- in -- in relationship with various stakeholders on priority paths that are -- includes safe routes to school. This is to connect students in the low to moderate income housing areas to the elementary school and Meridian Elementary and to Cole Valley Christian. So, these are -- are paths that have been rated in their highest area of need and they exist in the urban renewal district boundaries outside of the core area and in the residential area. I think one of the things that the MDC board was excited about is to be able to bring some of these infrastructure improvements to areas within the urban renewal district that hasn't gotten a lot of attention with their efforts for slum and blight, but it -- it brings a real need to the safety aspect of it. The board, too, understands the -- the design and construction constraints and does appreciate that this conversation is being held at this level with City Council to know that it's not just a one time, that it's a several year obligation and that if federal funds do dry up that there will be some responsibility on them to fund the construction of the project. So, that has been a discussion at the board level as well and so I appreciate you bringing it for an item to discuss. So, Council, any questions on that? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Chris, recognizing your still somewhat new into the role, but if I remember correctly about a year ago your predecessor brought a project of a similar scope, sidewalks for downtown and my assumption is that subrecipient has pulled their application and this is a new one from the MDC? Are the scopes similar in nature, same in nature, different? I think for me that would be helpful to get some understanding as to what -- what's changed. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 14 of 65 Pope: Madam Mayor, Councilman -- or Council Member Cavener, I think that before I get right into your question, this is -- part of the complexity of this -- this project was initially an alternate project, because as you just mentioned, there was a project previously in place to kind of do something very -- very similar. That particular subrecipient, for whatever reason, was not able to -- to follow through and now that -- at least year that it wasn't going to be something that we could pursue. To my understanding -- I haven't had a lot of work particularly with that -- that former subrecipient or -- but I guess as it moves forward my understanding is that they were different projects. They were different organizations. De Weerd: Chris, I can perhaps help you out there. Pope: Please. Yes, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: That project was tied to a low income workforce housing project that is not going forward. They are building townhomes instead. And so they did remove the off-premise sidewalk requirement in that area, because -- because they are moving forward with a different type of project. Pope: Thank you, Madam Mayor. And kind in addition to kind of this entire context, as you guys know with this program we are currently kind of being monitored by -- by HUD right now regarding our timeliness in the use of the funds that we are going through. So, when we had this initial subrecipient back out and we switched to this project with MDC and as the complexities kind of changed working with MDC, as things have gotten pushed and back and back and we are really eager to get moving, we recognize that's -- as Madam Mayor has noted, there is a clear need for this project. There is a clear capacity for MDC to conduct the project and we are just hoping to get it moving as quickly as possible in order to meet the needs in the community. As things have moved on, kind of another aspect there is that a lot of what we were hoping and expecting this project to be in terms of counting for us in the eyes of the federal government is probably going to be a little different. The timeline has been pushed back by a couple of months. So, this probably won't have a large impact on -- at least as large of an impact on our timeliness reports as we were hoping that it would, but as we move forward with this, again, there is a clear need. We are excited in the planning department to get moving. Everybody at MDC is very on board with this. But there is some intricacy to how this works. There is a commitment level that spans multiple years and there is a lot of different factors, too, that we want to make sure is on the table for everybody in considering this when it comes on to your consent agenda. De Weerd: And I think for all the subrecipients there has been a heavier burden in recordkeeping and -- that the subrecipients take on and so that's -- that's one of the complexities in the sidewalk issue. It brings in the Davis-Bacon wages, but right now construction is so high, bids are coming in that that's not even a problem because of the cost associated to two projects. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 15 of 65 Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Follow-up question if I may. Then, Chris, what's -- what's the proposed cost for design and what is an anticipated cost of construction? Pope: So, actually, if I can, I'm going to move forward with this right now and I can answer that question. So, right now this grant that we are looking at for MDC for the design is up to -- to not exceed, I guess, the clause of 60,000 dollars for the design for five segments of sidewalk in the downtown area, particularly, again, that area that's serving children who are of the low to moderate income geographic area and in addition to this I'm going kind of jump forward. I can show you -- I'm going to go through every single applicant that we have had for the 2017 program year, but MDC has applied particularly for the construction of these sidewalks, a grant worth 240,000 dollars. Again, this is like a very high level estimate, because we need a contract -- the ability to develop a contract and a price estimate as we move forward with s it. But with the estimates that we have with these particular sidewalks -- and this is inclusive of -- of that amount that we are looking at for this -- for this project in particular. In addition, as you can see, MDC has also applied for a part two aspect of -- of this sidewalk construction in low to moderate income areas in the city. This part two -- this particular application is, again, for 60,000 dollars to design some more segments of sidewalk somewhere else in the city. In a very similar area, but different segments and, then, obviously, following that there will need to be construction. In terms of -- these are applications we have. They haven't gone through our committee yet, they are not final recommendations in any way, and that is the case for all of the applicants I'm going to get through as I kind of talk a little bit more. But, in general, that's what's on the table right now. As the scoring committee goes to this and develops recommendations that funding amount might change, how we spread it over a couple of years might change . The structure of what will be presented to you as Council may be altered, but that is, essentially, the cost for construction. Okay. Madam Mayor, anything else on this point with MDC before I move into the other projects? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Chris, the slide is helpful. I'm having difficulty, though, separating this new project that we are somewhat discussing right now versus the -- it looks like three applications that we have from the MDC. So, can you walk me through specifically -- I get the 60,000 dollars for design, but the construction cost for that sidewalk that, essentially, this Council would need to be willing to agree to fund Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 16 of 65 however many years it would take. I think it's important to have at least an idea before we give you some directions on what that construction cost is -- is looking at. Pope: Yeah. Madam Mayor, Council Member Cavener, I agree with you a hundred percent and this is why we are here talking about this. It's not an insignificant amount. To kind of put it in perspective, we receive about 360,000 dollars a year for this program and 240 of that -- I mean it's literally two-thirds of the budget -- if we were to fund this at one hundred percent for just one year. These are the costs that we are expecting. How we move forward with that, how we want to structure the funding is going to be determined in our scoring committee, but also by you in -- in this conversation. But there is an expectation that if you approve this design grant for 60,000 dollars, that 240,000 dollars is going to come down the pipeline over some period of time in order to complete this project. Any other questions on that? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Madam Mayor. The 240, though, is the pass-through proceeds of CDBG funds, though; is that correct? De Weerd: That's correct. Pope: Yes. So, yes. Just to be very clear, Council Member Borton -- Borton: Yes. Pope: -- Madam Mayor, this would be coming from expected funds to be received in future years from the federal government . It's not going to come from General Fund. It's not going to come from anywhere other than the federal government as far as we have it estimated and it's been applied for right now. This is how we are moving forward with it and the expectation is that this program will be around for at least a couple more years, long enough to -- to move forward with this and to complete this project. Again, there is no surety with that, depending on how budgets move forward at the federal level, but that's the expectation that we have . So, there is some risk that we are assuming here, but I think that it will be -- moving forward with this is -- is safe in a lot of ways in terms of -- there is a clear need. We have got the money right now to do the design . We are more than likely going to have at least some funding for this next year to move forward with the construction and, then, we are all very hopeful that moving forward after that there will be funds to complete the construction, if necessary over a couple years down. Any other questions on the MDC project here? Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 17 of 65 Cavener: Not right now. Pope: Okay. So, Madam Mayor, if I may, I'm going to -- I'm going to run through the other applications that we received and I do want to highlight again -- about a month ago I came before you all and asked for recommendations for organizations that we could talk to , invite to apply. We have a pretty good reputation with a number of organizations, because they keep applying. They like partnering with us and we are able to make a relatively large impact on the -- on the community and the population they serve here and I want to run through this to give you a very clear idea of the applications that are on the table , again, in about a week or so we are going to run it through our grant committee meeting to discuss what recommendations we will officially bring to you all. This is the rough program -- I guess description of the program, the amount that the organization is asking for, the organization itself. So, starting off the Meridian Food Bank is asking for 40,000 dollars to continue to work with their hunger relief program and services here in Meridian and we have been working with them again for almost a decade and these funds have a very large impact and are a very large proportion of their budget and their ability to really serve the community here. The Allegheny County -- or not Allegheny. That's where I used to work. Ada County Housing Authority has asked for here 50,000 dollars again for down payment, closing costs, and principal buy down assistance for low to moderate income residents here. We have been working with them for the last couple of years funding this his program. It has been very successful and helped a lot of families. Neighborworks is asking for a very similar -- essentially the same programs, a different organization and a different amount. Jesse Tree, as I mentioned earlier, is providing those emergency rental assistance funds to individuals . They have -- they have, essentially, doubled their -- their ask for this year, as they have become I guess more acclimated to the community here in recognizing the need s that they could help serve here in Meridian through their services. We have a new organization that's pretty new. They provide services and case management services to those who are at risk of losing their housing. That organization is called Asego and they are run by the former assistant director of the Interfaith Rescue Mission and they are hoping to expand services here. They were particularly attracted to a priority that -- that we have been talking about here at least in our department that revolves around those who have to be rehoused due to emergencies, like fires, but also those who are feeling domestic violence. One of the -- the programs they are specifically applying for is for 15,000 dollars to -- to start up and establish a program that will provide motel vouchers for those individuals who are fleeing domestic violence, particularly they are citing the concern that many don't flee, because they don't have a place to go . And so this program in particular would address that need. They would work through a number of different referral systems in order to -- to find those clients and -- and meet those needs. Again, we will talk about this more as we move forward and get through our committee meeting. And, then, there are three grant -- grant applications on the table from Meridian Development Corporation. Two hundred Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 18 of 65 and forty thousand dollars for the construction of the sidewalk project we have talked about. Another 60,000 dollars ask for the design of a new set of segments of sidewalk and, then, also some funding of 40,000 dollars to kind of move forward and to supplement their facade improvement program. So, I would also like to kind of stand for questions at this point. If you have any questions about this -- I do -- sorry, I'm getting ahead of myself here. There are a couple of notable missing names that I want to put on your radar. The Boys & Girls Club did not apply for this year. We did not get an application from them. In addition we did not get any City of Meridian applicants, which is the first in a while. We also didn't get any applications from the Ada County School District. They were very interested and involved in talking with me, learning about this, but we didn't receive any applications from them. And also I wanted to follow up with you, Council Member Little Roberts on Catch. We are working with them. There are a bunch of loopholes because of the services they offer, where they are located and how it works. We are working with them to help kind of streamline the process, so that funding is a reasonable option from them in the future, but as far as this year goes we weren't unable to work anything out in time in order to -- to get an application on the table. So, with that I guess I -- I do officially want to stand for questions on these applicants. Are there any questions regarding whose has applied and your thoughts and concerns at this point? And these aren't final recommendations. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Either a question for tonight or when you -- when you come back to us. I know in the past some applicants have had a struggle to fulfill their financial obligations, spend the money that they have applied for. So, I think that's an important piece as we get ready to make some decisions over the next few weeks and months to have that updated information on how the current recipients that are reapplying for funds have been traditionally in spending those -- those allocated dollars and, then, just for clarification, should the Council choose not to fund the 60,000 dollar sidewalk design, would we no longer, then, be funding the 240,000 dollar sidewalk construction? Is that accurate? Or am I confusing things here? Pope: Madam Mayor, Council Member Cavener, they are completely separate. Cavener: Okay. Pope: They are unrelated to each other, other than they are coming -- they are the same funding stream, same organization carrying it out, but they are completely different projects and how we decided to move forward, whether we want a conglomerate designed together, whether we want to do them separately, Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 19 of 65 whether we want to try to do it all at the same time, would be up to you guys and the scoring committee. Cavener: Okay. Pope: But as of now they are completely unrelated in terms of -- like the actual logistic project itself. Cavener: Okay. De Weerd: Okay. Any further questions? Pope: Madam Mayor, Council Member Cavener, I did want to address that we have made some changes to the way that we are approaching the application and also the scoring of the applicants and the applications, particularly to meet -- I guess to address the concern that you just brought up . Every single application was required to give a very clear and specific schedule of which they expected to move forward with their projects and, in addition, there is a much more clear and quantifiable rubric that we are going to be using to score and we have weighted the things that are really important to us, like timeliness, as being worth more points in that rubric. Cavener: Great. Pope: So, the projects will definitely be judged according to how well they can avoid some of the problems we have had in the past, in addition to them meeting the needs and meeting the objectives and priorities of the city. So, just to highlight one last time, if I can kind of conclude with this, is our next steps. A week from this Friday we will have our first grant committee meeting where we will review all the applications, score them, and develop recommendations. We will develop that action plan and a couple weeks after that we will bring it back to you on the Council meeting on the 16th. We will have our consultant from BBC Research and Consulting here as well to present to you our five year consolidated plan, in addition to our recommendation for funding and action plan for the program year 2017. After that meeting there will be a public comment period of 34 days 'ish, whatever it turns out to be, ending on June 20th for a public hearing on the matter, after which you guys can move forward how you want to with our recommendations. But at that point any final questions or concerns I would invite at this point. De Weerd: Okay. No? Thank you, Chris. Pope: Thank you for your time. Item 8: Action Items Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 20 of 65 A. Public Hearing for Meridian Meadows Senior Community (H-2017-0011) by Giza Development/Michael Wright Located 2662 E. Magic View Drive 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 5.28 Acres of Land with an L-O Zoning District 2. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Nursing/Residential Care Facility in an L-O Zoning District De Weerd: Okay. Under Action Items, Item 8-A is a public hearing for H-2017- 0011. I will ask for staff comments at this time. Parsons: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Before you this evening is the Meridian Meadows Senior Care annexation and conditional use permit. The site consists of 5.28 acres of land, zoned RUT in Ada County and it's located at 2662 East Magic View Drive. In 2016 there was a development -- development application in front of you, which was called the Pope's Gardens application. We had a comp plan amendment, annexation, and a conditional use permit for a multi-family development and the Council did recommend denial of that application. So, the applicant is here this evening to discuss annexing the property, the 5.2 acres of land, with an L-O zone, which is consistent with the office land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan and staff is recommending a DA as a provision of annexation. A concurrent conditional use permit has also been applied for on the site plan and landscape plan are before you this evening . On the left-hand side is the site plan. You can see there are two structures proposed for development on this site. The building on the left-hand side consists of 37,800 square feet and will consist of 50 residential units and the building on the left will consist of 43,400 square feet and have 60 units themselves as well. If you look at the submitted site plan, the applicant is proposing two driveway accesses to East Magic View Drive and it's better here to see it on the landscape plan, but there is one here on the west boundary and, then, also one on the east boundary and, then, in the northwest corner there is a public street that is not constructed, but the right of way is stubbed to this property. So, that's a -- that's a key point at this point, but I will dive into that a little bit further as I get into my presentation this evening. So, currently this is all Magic View along the south boundary of this development. On ACHD's master street map a portion of East Magic View Drive is a collector road, which is the eastern half of the development. On the western portion of the site where this access touches, this is downgraded to a local street. So, currently in our UDC we try to restrict access to local streets whenever a local street is available and in this particular case they are allowed to have one access to a local street, but they must seek a Council waiver to have an access to the collector road as it's written in the UDC. So, that is one of the Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 21 of 65 requests that is on the table this even before you is allowing this eastern most driveway approach. Staff -- because the adjacent property to the east of this site is also in the county and fronts on that collector roadway, staff is requiring that cross-access easement is grounded to that property to the east to try to limit an access point to that commercial road in the future. Now, if you recall with the Pope's Garden project that came through in 2016 and ultimately was demised -- or denied, that development went before ACHD's commission. It went through the -- the public was there to testify and one of their -- and ACHD's commission recommended that that road not extend with the development of that project. They had suggested or recommended or approved a gated emergency access and a ped-bike connection to the development. Now that we have a new application on the table, staff did recommend that the road be punched through and the primary reason for it is because, one, our Comprehensive Plan supports connectivity with adjacent subdivisions, but if you look at the surrounding areas -- surrounding properties in this area, development is very -- or pedestrian -- or vehicular connectivity is very limited in here. There is really only one east-west segment through the Woodbridge Subdivision. So, staff felt closing off this roadway would -- would be a detriment to the surrounding areas and provide a needed -- and decrease the need for an access coming off of Franklin into this area and -- into this area of Meridian. And I would mention to you that the City Council did direct staff to provide a letter to ACHD and have them study the traffic in the surrounding area. We did get an update from ACHD staff and based on their study of their -- now they haven't done an official traffic study, but just looking at the surrounding developments, without further redevelopment of p some adjacent county properties, if this road is not extended they don't anticipate any other connectivity in the area at this time and that was something that we discussed with ACHD staff as well. So, one thing that I did want to mention to you is when we took this before Planning and Zoning Commission, their recommendation included ACHD's recommendation and just leave it as a gated emergency access and a bike-ped connection through this proposed development. Now, as far as the land use buffers -- or required adjacent to the residential uses, the applicant is required to provide -- if the road is not constructed the applicant is required to provide a 20 foot wide landscape buffer along the east and the north boundary. Because the property to the east is comp planned for office, there is an ability to waive some of that buffer requirements, but the applicant has not proposed that. Currently they are proposing to put in the required 20 foot wide landscape buffers. Again, the only thing that staff is recommending is that they provide cross-access to that adjacent property. So, the applicant did provide some conceptual development building elevations for you this evening. It looks like their mix of materials include horizontal and vertical board and batten style Hardie board siding. Multiple colors. Stone veneer columns and accents on walls at the entrance and asphalt shingles. The applicant will have to come before planning staff and submit a certificate of zoning compliance and administrative design review application and for the redesign -- or to get approval of that prior to development on this site. The Planning and Zoning Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 22 of 65 Commission did recommend approval of this project at their previous hearing and as I mentioned to you they did not recommend the extension of Hickory Road through this development. So, as I'm presenting to you this evening is the plan that the Planning and Zoning Commission took action on. So, I'm going to briefly go through this summary of the Commission hearing for you. We had Michael Wright, Kent Brown, Kevin Amar, Celeste Fox and Gene Fox and John Mundt testifying in favor of the project. In opposition we had David Ballard and Ron Fence. And, then, commenting on the application we had Rich Howell, Lori Somazzi and Mary Rockrohr. Kent Brown submitted testimony as part of the written testimony as part of the application in response to the staff report. Key items of discussion at the public hearing. The extension to Hickory Road to the development was one concern. The other was a dense buffer and landscape -- dense buffer and landscaping and fencing along the north boundary to buffer it up against the Greenhill Estates Subdivision and I showed, as I presented to you, they are providing the required 20 foot wide landscape buffer that's required in the L-O zoning in district. The other was concern for cut-through traffic through Greenhill Estates if Hickory Way was extended. Improvements needed to Magic View. One item -- if I could step back here. One item of concern when Pope's Gardens came through and even with this application is how this intersection -- the current design of this intersection and how it gets icy in the winter and how it doesn't quite terminate that well. So, that, again, was brought up with this particular application and, again, ACHD has not provided any comments on that. It's basically they are going to recommended it stay the way it is. Key items of discussion as part of the Planning and Zoning Commission, again, was the Hickory Road extension and how that would affect the traffic through the adjacent neighborhoods. The only recommendation -- or the change to staff's recommendation was to strike that condition for the expansion of North Hickory Way and so, really, there are two outstanding issues that we would like you to take under consideration this evening. One we would like you to still consider the extension of Hickory Way through this development to support our Comprehensive Plan and make sure that we have additional access points and connectivity within this section of Meridian. And as -- the other one is -- as I mentioned to you earlier in my presentation -- is the waiver for the easternmost access to the collector street on the south boundary. So, written testimony since the Commission hearing. We had Kent Brown, the applicant's representative, in agreement with the Commission's recommendation and, then, we also received the petition from the Greenhill Estates Subdivision in favor of the project, not in favor of the road extension. And the same was true of the Woodbridge Homeowners Association. With that, again, Planning and Zoning Commission and staff did recommend approval of this project. I will conclude my presentation and stand for any questions you may have. De Weerd: Thank you, Bill. Council, any questions at this point? Milam: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 23 of 65 De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Bill, I have a question. It seems like most of the contention is regarding Hickory Way. If we were to leave that as an emergency slash pedestrian for now, is that something that can be extended later or is this final decision for future growth of this area? Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, as it stands now ACHD's preference is that we get an easement over that right of way for an emergency access only. We are not requiring that street to be extended. So, if -- if that's how this plan is approved, then, more likely that road would not get extended. Similar to what happened to -- happened when Woodbridge was developed in 2001. There was a stub there also and it was approved for a pedestrian connection and we don't anticipate that getting punched through either . So, as it's written it's not expected to get extended. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Uh-huh. Milam: Is there anything that we can do to -- to change that -- put it right -- so that we have -- so that we could possibly extend it in the future if necessary? Is there any -- is there any way we can do that? Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I think -- as I mentioned to you, there is a development agreement. I mean certainly there can be a provision if and when something else happens in the area -- I don't -- I don't have a magic condition for you this evening to have you place it in a condition, but there is still dedicated right of way there, it's just that the road is not constructed. So, if we can get some -- to me it comes down to a couple things. We need some concurrence from the applicant. We need some buy in from the neighbors, of course, because they are certainly -- this is a point of contention for them is the extension of that roadway. There has to be a happy medium there. Certainly my experience with the project, the concern of why this road should not punch through and the reason why the Commission had concerns with it was for the fact that it -- it's an unimproved road. Even though it's a paved access through that Greenhill Estates, there is no sidewalks, there is no street lights, and so having people cut through that and people walking on those streets -- they didn't feel like it was a safe environment to have cut-through traffic into this part of this -- into this development and that's why they planned it with not -- with no extension of that roadway. Now, certainly we -- we could leave an open-ended condition that if and when this Greenhill Estates ever redevelops, comes into the city, we get those streetlights, we get sidewalk, that we can -- we can revisit that in the future. I think that's something that we maybe could draft and generate and put in a Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 24 of 65 development agreement. So, never say never. But there is going to have to be a time hold or some kind of threshold -- time frame or a threshold on how and when we expect that road to punch through. Because right now the way the site plan is designed, it's not going to be because it's -- it's not designed to have cut-through you don't want a public street stubbing into a commercial drive aisle. I mean the either has to terminate in a cul-de-sac or be extended with redevelopment, either with Greenhill and this property. De Weerd: So, basically, the applicant is okay with it. ACHD is okay not connecting. The neighbors don't want it to connect. I think I'm missing something here, but -- Milam: Madam Mayor, I'm with you, because I heard that you -- that staff wanted it to go through and what I just heard from you right now was that you didn't. So, it confused me a little bit. De Weerd: Well, there -- there are issues connecting a public road to -- into a county sub that doesn't have sidewalks and streetlights and all of that and we do have that scenario in at least one other part of our city and it hasn't been positive . So, I -- I think that the discussion that -- the Planning and Zoning Commission really makes a lot of sense, leave it for emergency access and -- and -- well, we will wait and hear what everyone has to say tonight. We don't have to solve this yet. So, does the applicant have comments? We got the cart in front of the horse. Thank you for being here. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Wright: Madam Mayor and Council Members, my name is Michael Wright. I'm with Giza Development, 801 North 500 West, Suite 300, in Bountiful, Utah. Good to be with you this evening. Bill -- staff has done a wonderful job explaining our project. We look forward to being in your community and providing a great care and service for members of your community. We, again, don't agree with the extension of Hickory Lane. We would request that our annexation be approved and our conditional use for our site plan as shown before you tonight, with the waiver approval for the access. If there is any questions about our project or about our operation, I'm happy to address those now. If not I will sit down. De Weerd: Okay. Council? Borton: Yeah. Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Give us a quick snapshot of what you propose Hickory Way to be. Any changes to it? Just keep it as is for an emergency access or is it improved at all? Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 25 of 65 Wright: It would be for emergency access only. Okay. And we have provided a pedestrian path as well for access for pedestrians. Borton: Madam Mayor? And the maintenance of that going forward falls on who? Wright: On ours. On our side. De Weerd: Other questions? Thank you. Wright: Thank you. De Weerd: This starts our public testimony part. If you signed up our city clerk will -- oh. I guess the applicant still is doing his presentation. Sorry. I was so excited, Kent, that -- Brown: I can understand that. I'm excited. De Weerd: If you will state your name for the record. Brown: For the record Kent Brown. 3161 East Greenwood. And I live in Greenhill Estates. As you might recall when I was here a year ago and we had some similar discussions about the apartments and so forth, all of a sudden I'm -- I'm popular again, but this application -- the discussion about putting a road through and putting Hickory through, as Bill stated, the highway district has asked it not be extended. That's our condition of approval. If you were to ask us to do that you would be putting us in a situation -- in fact, you would be putting us in a situation where I cannot comply. This should have I guess been addressed with the highway district sooner, but the highway district viewed what took place a year ago March 30th as being their decision about the extension of Hickory and that the road wasn't to go through and the conditions at that time was that we gate it and that we pave 20 feet and that's what our proposal has been here . We had a long, lengthy discussion at our pre-application meeting with staff and we had already been to the highway district. We explained what was going on. Staff asked us to one more time go back to the highway district and ask that question and we did before we submitted our application and the highway district has been really firm in the fact that it didn't want the road to go through. They even prep'd Justin, if you want to have Justin run up here from the highway district, ask him that question. De Weerd: As much as I like to put Justin on the spot, I don't think we need to. Brown: I think he could just shake his head. But that's kind of -- because I have talked with him about that -- that same situation. I even had a neighbor call me and tell me that I didn't do a good job before Planning and Zoning and that I needed to really hit this point, that this decision has been made, the road isn't to Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 26 of 65 be extended. It would be difficult to grant right of way with this site where we have parking and other things there, to have a full 50 foot wide street right of way. You know -- De Weerd: Kent, would it help if we just say we get it and -- Brown: I think so. De Weerd: Okay. Brown: And I think that if you ask -- poll the public, because this was the discussion at P&Z was everyone was for us, they were all against the road -- De Weerd: Well, I think, you know, one thing I guess I would say is we have seen a project here for -- we love seeing you guys, but, you know, we love to think that we finally have a project that you're okay with and if it's just all about that access no access I mean. Yeah. The access or not. You know. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I was unsure of it until Kent made his presentation. Yeah. That was a changer. Brown: Okay. Borton: Thank you. Brown: I appreciate that. That will help me when I walk around the neighborhood. Borton: You're popular again. De Weerd: You can hold your head high in the neighborhood now. Brown: If you -- one of the things that really hasn't been discussed is about the site plan. It is really sensitive to the Greenhill neighbors. There is three or four parking stalls -- Amar: They got it. Brown: Okay. Everything close to Magic View, so I will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Any questions for Kent? Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 27 of 65 Borton: On the -- the nonmotorized connection Hickory -- Brown: Yes. Borton: -- the piece that's maintained -- I'm not familiar with its dimensions. Is there -- in future I don't want it to be a spite strip with weeds and whatnot. Brown: The right of way is 50 feet. ACHD asked for a Meridian granted -- an easement granted to the City of Meridian -- De Weerd: We are not going to take care of it. Brown: And think it's for the emergency access. That's the part that is a little confusing about that, but I would be more agreeable to maintain the -- the pavement part -- De Weerd: Sold. Brown: -- and the gate -- and the neighbors have been using that already, so -- they would just have to move their vehicle to the side. De Weerd: Okay. So, the -- the applicant is -- is committing to taking care of that easement then? Brown: That's correct. De Weerd: Okay. Borton: And is it -- Madam Mayor. Is the easement wider than the pavement itself? Brown: Yes, it is. Borton: So, it's not limited just to the pavement, but the full breadth of the easement is maintained? Is that correct? Now is the time to make sure we are crystal clear on who is responsible for what. Amar: For the record Kevin Amar. 1548 West Cayuse Creek Drive. We will work with the neighbors. Right now they have got that in lawn and grass and they are maintaining it. Borton: Okay. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 28 of 65 Amar: So, it's not just a spite strip, it's not just a weed patch. It's nicely maintained. So, we will work with the neighbors. Maybe they will want to keep it as part of their grass and they will maintain it or it will be maintained as part of the development itself. But one way or another the City of Meridian will not have to maintain it. Borton: Okay. Thank you. De Weerd: Our code enforcement will have your name and number. Amar: Unfortunately, I think they are already do. But we get along well with them, so we will -- we will take care of it. Borton: Okay. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Amar: Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. This is a public hearing and since we do seem to have agreement on the connectivity -- if when your name is -- is read you want to provide testimony, we would invite you to come up and share your voice with us. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Before the public hearing begins I think it's important for me to declare that on this application I received a few e-mails and phone calls from affected citizens. During our conversation informed them that we can't talk about the particulars. I acknowledged receipt of the e-mail and encouraged them to come and participate in the process. I don't think that any of the contacts impacted my ability to be fair or impartial on this application, but I thought it would be important to be declared for the record. De Weerd: Thank you. Mr. Clerk. Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. David Ballard signed up against and would like to testify. De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Ballard: Mayor de Weerd, Council Member Little Roberts, Borton, Milam and Cavener. My name is David Ballard. I'm a resident at 2482 East Springwood in Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 29 of 65 Meridian. I sit in the pathway of what some people would run two to five thousand cars by my house. To hear the suggestion to extend Hickory I see as trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. The present infrastructure is woefully inadequate to support the unprecedented future increase in capacity. My concern is safety. We are on a narrow oval, which is a mile. Ninety degree corners at the top and at the bottom. You have to creep around those corners presently to turn safely. The straight stretches I dare to say you can do 40 to 60 miles an hour on those straight stretches. There are no sidewalks. There are no street lights. So, my concern is safety. Now, at the same time my concern is for the development of what lies to the south in that area across the street from St. Luke's and that other area. So, I beg to differ. It's not about connecting subdivisions to subdivisions, it's about running a commercial street through a residence to serve future commercial properties. I object to that respectfully. But I get it that we need to move traffic in and out of that area. There are alternate routes. You could improve turning lanes at the Allen-St. Luke's light. You could expand that. You could expand East Freeway Drive. You can expand Bentley. There are alternates to get back. So, that area to the south of us is somewhat landlocked and I'd like to see it develop, but I don't think running a commercial street through a residential section is the answer. It's asking a five pound sack to contain a 20 pound problem and we get the cut -through traffic and the two to five thousand cars running through my subdivision. Is it personal? Is it somewhat greedy? I thought about that. I live in a premier neighborhood. It's quiet. It's an enclave within an area of chaos. Who doesn't want to avoid Franklin and Eagle. I have no choice. And I patiently wait a long time to get through that. But I would submit that that little chunk of county around the city is consistent with the Pegasus report that talks about other areas blending into developments and allowing for -- it is still a county setting. It's peaceful. It's quiet. De Weerd: David, you need to summarize. But I agree. Ballard: I'm for the development that Mr. Brown and his group has presented. I just disagree with extending the street in that fashion. I think there is a better way to get to that development. That's what I ask the Council to consider. Thank you, Mayor. Thank you, Council Members. De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. Coles: Tom Baker signed up against the project. Indicated no street access, but did not indicate whether or not he wished to testify. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Ian and Jeanette Sodine signed up in favor of the project. Would like to testify, but indicated no street access on the sheet. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 30 of 65 Sodine: Mayor and Council Members. De Weerd: Good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you will state your name and address for the record. Sodine: My name is Ian Sodine. The address is 2663 East Autumn Way. So, on your map I am the occupant on the right side of the map at the top. So, I'm the next door neighbor to this development. Pope Garden I wasn't very happy with that whole deal, those apartments and all the transient and whatever else we might have said, that's all under the bridge. This development seems like a fantastic deal. The property has been up for sale for 19 years. For at least the 19 years that I have lived there I have always known something was going to be developed. Didn't realize stub roads were coming through until Woodbridge was developed and got a big surprise when we came to all that stuff. It is a walkway coming through and there is a lot of Woodbridge folks that walk that one mile loop. It turns out it's actually a little nice scenic and quiet area. So, you wouldn't just impact us if you put the road through, but you actually impact Woodbridge a second time and they seem to have enough bashing of traffic as it is. I don't have good solutions for you on how to fix that. I do walk through the area of Magic View from time to time, because I actually walk through Woodbridge using the passageway and, then, I get confused with your planning on that area , because it's a little county lane, unless the property has been developed, and, then, it's a three lane with parking and sidewalks. So, walking from Woodbridge, as soon as I get through the new R-8 subdivision, I'm on a dirt road trying not to get hit by a lot of traffic until I get past Rich's house, the five acres to the west of this development. Is that right? Piece of this development. Then I'm on sidewalks again. So, maybe the way to fix your problem with that whole developing area is to actually authorize the road and sidewalk to be developed before the land was purchased and developed each time, so that you have a full circle with the traffic light in and out, even though that's on Eagle Road. As a way to show the traffic, this is the recommended way in and out of this area. Otherwise, it gets quite confusing. That's all I have to say. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. And we would agree with you, but we don't do roads. But I see that Justin is over there and he heard what you suggested. But I think in that area it's all development driven and it's been difficult for Ada County Highway District to get right of way to do improvements when they don't own the right of way and there is no development in the immediate future. So, that's why it comes as development occurs. Sodine: Okay. So, the last thing I would say with that, then, is if you did put the road through our subdivision you would have four exits out of the area -- two exits on the one acre lots, both T into Franklin, which is now a five lane road, stop light only. So, getting out on Locust through the bridge is just as difficult. We are as bad, depending on the traffic. If you want to drive through traffic the half acres of Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 31 of 65 Greenhill Estates, then, you stub out on Springwood and Autumn and you're back on Eagle and you can only turn right . You might as well come out at Magic View or St. Luke's Hospital at the traffic light, so -- thank you for your time. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Liz Booth signed up in favor and does not wish to testify. John Overton signed up in favor and would like to testify. De Weerd: Hi. Overton: Good evening, Madam Mayor and Members of Council, city staff, Dean. Can't forget Dean. De Weerd: That's the first time Dean has been addressed. I think he's feeling pretty privileged over there. Overton: I come here -- I sit on the board now for -- De Weerd: Would you, please, state your name and address or -- the -- Overton: My name is John Overton. 1922 East Bowstring in the Woodbridge Subdivision. For the last 15 years. Now, let me start off with a little history, because we talked about comprehensive plans. My family moved to the state in 1977 and they moved into a brand new subdivision called Greenhills Estates. So, this plan for two roads going into the future of the unknown is over 40 years old . We had no idea a forty-year-old snapshot was a two lane Eagle Road with a very narrow overpass. A Locust Grove that dead ended at the interstate. A two lane Franklin. A two-lane Overland. A great little bar -- neighborhood bar across the street from Greenhills Estates and the greatest pheasant hunting in the world where St. Luke's sits. We have changed. So, the fact that we sit here and say we have a comp plan that designates that this is our last best decision for traffic, I think we can do better. We need to do better. Now, I think it's horrible -- we respect our neighbors in Greenhills. This road should never be considered. It should be just like what we have in Woodridge . It should be a walking road. But we still fight with all these developments and what they are going to do to Woodbridge and still hope there is going to be some discussion and some plan and some way to limit or reduce the attractiveness of cutting through Woodbridge into these upcoming developments. We want the medical corridor. That's what we believed was coming, that's what we want it to become. This is exactly -- I'm so glad I'm not fighting with them this year, because we spent last year arguing back and forth. This is what we wanted. This is what we testified to. But we need to look beyond this as well and I don't like hearing the words that this is our last great hope and if we don't approve this road, then, we are just going to have Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 32 of 65 to put up with ever increasing traffic through Woodbridge, because we are the only cut-through. I think there is -- De Weerd: John -- Overton: Yes. De Weerd: I think Bill was just doing his job. Overton: I know it. I like Bill. I called him -- I e-mailed Bill. It's not personal. It's just there has got to be a better way and I hate to say it, but I mean we got ITD on Eagle Road, ACHD controls the roads, whether we put a turnaround and we stop Magic View from cutting all the way through and we make it a turnaround, so everybody has to go all the way through the long route to get through that business complex, which would upset some of my neighbors, because they use it for a cut-through, I guarantee you. But we have got to think of a better plan that's got to be well thought, it's got to be well engineered and it's going to cost money. There is nothing for free. But I think we still need to look at a way to safely build in all of this complex based on what it's going to do to Woodbridge in the future and what those traffic concerns are going to bring to us. Stand for any questions. De Weerd: I guess my question would be would you be willing to help put together a group from Woodbridge and Greenhill Estates to work with ACHD and our staff on some proposals to bring to ACHD so as development occurs -- and it will -- you have a plan that can be developed as development occurs? Overton: Madam Mayor, you know the answer to that before you asked it. De Weerd: I know. Because I would have volun-told you, so -- but we appreciate that suggestion and your volunteering to head up this group, because I -- I do think that that is in -- you have -- you're spot on. That does need a discussion and I think we can pull the right people together to start that . Overton: Great. Thank you, Mayor. De Weerd: And welcome to retirement. Overton: Thank you, Mayor. Coles: Samuel Snyder signed up against and does not wish to testify. Kelli Ketlinski signed up in favor and would like to testify. De Weerd: Good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you will state your name and address for the record. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 33 of 65 Ketlinski: Sure. I am Kelli Ketlinski. 2586 East Autumn Way in Meridian in Greenhill Estates and good evening, Madam Mayor and Council Members. Appreciate just a few minutes of your time. Actually, it's going to be less than that, because I'm severely curtailing my comments based on the direction that I hear from the board right now, but -- and I had some photographs that I wanted to share, but I don't think I even need to do that at this point . The one point that I did want to make is that at the Ada County Highway District -- in hearing they had a lot of public input, they had a lot of discussion with staff -- ACHD staff, as well as Meridian staff, because Mr. Parsons was able to attend and answered their questions and provided a lot of insight at that time and the highway district at that time voted unanimously and without objection to -- on that application specifying that the road should not go through . But what I found really interesting about that was that Commissioner Baker, who was a big proponent I'm told of connectivity and these kind of issues and rarely, if ever, votes against a road going through, not only was a unanimous decision, but actually brought the motion herself limiting that. And, then, again, the entire board voted unanimously and without objection. So, that really is the only point that I wanted to make. I appreciate your time and any questions? Or if you want to see my photographs I'm happy to share with you. Show you what that easement looks like right now and how nice the neighbors take care of it, so -- De Weerd: Council, would you like to see the photographs or -- we will take her word for it? Cavener: Madam Mayor? Do your photographs look different than the Google Map image? Ketlinski: Yes. Cavener: I'd like to see them. De Weerd: Well, let's look at them. Ketlinski: Okay. De Weerd: You can give them to Mr. Clerk. Cavener: We have a brand new fancy system. I can't wait to watch it work. Ketlinski: Just an experiment with your technology. So, I have numbered the pages and looking at -- will it show on this one as well? Okay. The -- page number one, the first photograph is the location of the right of way -- is it showing on yours? De Weerd: You will see it when we do. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 34 of 65 Ketlinski: Okay. De Weerd: It's got to warm up. Ketlinski: Okay. So, that top photograph is actually the right of way. I'm standing across the street and looking at the right of way right where the pickup truck and the RV are parked right in that area looking straight across there is where the development will be. So, as you can see they have -- they I think -- I believe use a weed killer to keep the actual easement so there is not much growing on it, but on either side is grass that is maintained by the neighbors. The photograph right below it is right on the right-hand side, kind of in the middle of the picture, is right where that right of way comes out on East Autumn Way. You turn around to 180 degrees, you look down that street and it's about a three-quarter mile straight away straight down the neighborhood and this goes straight into one of the 90 degree turns that we have heard about many times. If you look at the second page, these are just two more pictures of the right-hand turns. They look like dead ends, but they are not. Those roads continue around our big one mile oval. If you go to the third page, this is -- this is the busiest corner in the entire neighborhood. It's right on Springwood and Ravenswood and you can't even see where the -- again where the road goes, but it goes off to the right there up into the neighborhood. The photograph below it is in early morning as I couldn't sleep one morning thinking of this going on. Got out there with my camera and took a picture with no flash -- so, this is coming -- looking down the opposite way into that intersection. That's what that looks like. Then I thought I better get a flash -- well, actually, next picture. This is that same -- looking down that same road and I do not intend to call out any neighbors who were driving this way, but this is a very common way that cars come around those 90 degree turns. You see that -- that car, they don't -- it's very difficult to stay in your own lane unless you're going about 15 miles an hour or less. Maybe five miles an hour to stay in your lane on those. So, oftentimes cars just come around those 90 degree turns out into both lanes. A bus physically cannot make that turn in one lane. De Weerd: I'm sure they appreciated you blocking out their license plate, so they weren't incriminated. Ketlinski: Far enough away, so -- that's that same -- or this is another one of the 90 degree turns. If you go to the page number five, this is a flash -- I'm standing out there, I can hear neighbors walking, they didn't even know I was there until I flashed my camera so you could see them on the left -hand. I have my back to the bus stop area. But that's with a flash, so -- and there is two neighbors there. There is not one, but two. So, this oftentimes during the school year this is what the bus stop looks like when kids are out there. The bus stop is on -- on page number six. There is a mailbox. The bus stop is just beyond that, so -- and, then, page number seven is the Google Maps. I cut and pasted -- literally cut and Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 35 of 65 pasted it together and put stars on the tree where all the driveways are and there is some mailboxes right on those corners. So, that's what we are looking at. Those were my photographs to share with you. De Weerd: Thank you. Any questions from -- Cavener: Madam Mayor, I do have a question. Ketinski: Okay. Cavener: Your first picture that showed what would appear to be the right of way, which I think correlates with what I see on Google Maps, which is that -- the RV -- Ketlinski: Uh-huh. Cavener: It appears that it's parked in the right of way. Is that -- when you were walking the neighbor that's what you're seeing as well? Ketlinski: Yes. Because there is nothing beyond that at this point. It just empties into the back of the lot that is not developed there. Cavener: Thank you. Ketlinski: Okay. You're welcome. De Weerd: Thank you. Ketlinski: Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you, Bill. Coles: Bill and Jan Evarts signed up in favor. Indicated no street, but did not indicate whether or not they wished to testify. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Sue -- and I apologize, Sue, I don't know how to pronounce your last name. Lovani or Lovarni. Signed up in favor, but did not indicate whether she wished to testify. Christopher Kirk signed up in favor without the stub -- stub street, but did not indicate whether he wished to testify. De Weerd: Good evening. Kirk: Madam Mayor, City Council, I'm Christopher Kirk. 2465 East Springwood. And I just stand before you to put a face to the issue. I do know many of you and Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 36 of 65 I was the one that had called Luke and I will testify that he did send me to the city website to fill out the form and send the information so that all City Council members would have my -- my testimony. So, I thank you for that transparency. I will just -- it's an issue of safety for me and my children -- I have three small children. We do walk that neighborhood. They will be using those bus stops. I'd like to see the project go through without a stub street. That's all I have got. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Cheryl Robison signed up in favor without the stub street, but did not indicate whether she wished to testify. Betty Montelay signed up in favor and does not wish to testify. Jeff Howell signed up in favor, but does not wish to testify. Celeste Fox signed up in favor and does not wish to testify. Gene Fox signed up in favor and does not wish to testify. Art and Michelle Beal signed up in favor indicating no street, but did not indicate whether or not they wished to testify. Mary Rockrohr signed up in favor, indicating no street, and does which to testify. De Weerd: Good evening. Rockrohr: Mary Rockrohr. 2715 East Autumn Way and Commissioners and Mayor, thank you very much for giving us your time. We appreciate it. Mine will be real short. Almost everything that basically has been said that I would like to say. We are in agreement with the project. I think it's a very good transition, especially for those of us that are to the north. My one big concern now, basically, would be that when Woodbridge was established the eastern section of it a mistake was made and they are paying for it now, because of the fact that Locust Grove ended up opening up into there. So, they do have major traffic along Bowstring. If you were to open up Hickory Way into Greenhills you would make another big mistake. Leaving it as pedestrian and emergency I think is a wonderful idea, but I think that's where it needs to stop definitely. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Brent Belliston signed up in favor, indicating without the street, but no indication of testimony. Elle Buchanan signed up in favor, writing emergency access to Greenhills Estates only. Limited street access. No indication of testimony. Jim Voorhees signed up in favor without the stub street, but no testimony indication. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Gloria Hunt signed up in favor without the stub street, but no testimony indication. Roger Tebo signed up in favor. Does not wish to testify. Linda Tebo signed up in favor and does not wish to testify. Robert Parker signed up in favor and would like to testify. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 37 of 65 De Weerd: Good evening. Parker: Thank you. Good evening. I just wanted to -- De Weerd: If you could, please, state your name and address for the record. Parker: My name is Robert Parker. I live at 1943 East Pegram Street in Woodbridge. De Weerd: Thank you. Parker: I just wanted to say that I am in favor of the project as it stands without the street. Hickory Way would be a street to nowhere, basically, because once you get into Greenhills Estates you have -- you wouldn't -- most people would want to be going north. There is no way on God's green earth you can go north off of Hickory Way. You have three out of four turns onto Eagle -- it's southbound only. So, there is no reason to go into Greenhills Estates. And Franklin it's going to be a real problem and already is. That's my only idea. De Weerd: Thank you. Parker: No street. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Coles: Linda Herman signed up in favor and does not wish to testify. Kevin Arnold -- I believe that's Kevin's last name. Signed up in favor and would like to testify. John Duncan signed up in favor, indicating no through street, but no testimony indication. Kelly Barber signed up as neutral and would like to testify. De Weerd: Good evening. Thank you for being with us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Barber: Yes, Madam Mayor and Commissioners. My name is Kelly Barber. I live at 2482 East Autumn Way, which is in Greenhills Estates. One little snippet of my property is in one of those pictures that Mrs. Ketlinski showed earlier. I just want to say a couple things just generally. I think this is a good example of the community working together, the fact that Mr. Brown can show his face in Greenhills Estates is a good thing these days and -- but I just -- I think it is -- I think there are a lot of us that came out of the discussions last year saying the goal is not to oppose any development, it's to come up with ways that are good use of the property and I think this is a good one generally, the medical tie, it's obviously a big thing I think and does kind of sit more with I think what people's expectations were when they moved into these areas and it definitely addresses Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 38 of 65 some of the traffic concerns. But there is one issue I did want to raise and I don't know if it's too late in the game to do this or not, but I'm still a little confused as to what the reasoning is for the emergency access and all. I can understand, I guess, the pedestrian easement, although there already is that on the -- further to the west between Greenhills Estates and Woodbridge, but as I just think about it from a practical standpoint, you have the state police and the city police that are due west that would not come through an access point from there if they were trying to get to that property. So, if they are trying to get to Greenhills Estates there is already a way to get there now. If they are trying to get to this property they are going to come through Woodbridge, so I'm not sure what the reasoning is there. If you're talking about medical, obviously, St. Luke's is directly east and would certainly come across St. Luke's Way and hang a right and get right to the to the skilled nursing facility and the assisted living home, so I'm trying to figure out the reasoning for the access -- emergency access easement and part of my question I think is -- goes back to Commissioner Milam's question about, well, why are we -- is this cutting this off forever or is this something that’s still hanging out there and to me I feel like if you create an emergency access easement for vehicular, you're not really putting this issue to bed, we are creating it potentially somewhere down the road where it could still happen and I don't understand the need for it at this point and I don't think that's ever been fully explained or addressed. So, I know ACHD -- I know I was at that hearing and it was raised there and I don't even -- I think they were kind of at a default, let's go pedestrian emergency, but there wasn't really discussion about what the reason was for the emergency, so I just -- I'm hoping someone can explain the reasoning for the emergency access. So, that would be my question. De Weerd: Thank you. Don't look at me to explain it to you. Bill or Kent, is that going to be a popular response? I'm kidding. Well, we will get your question answered, Kelly. Barber: Okay. Thank you very much for -- De Weerd: And I will tell John Overton here is another volunteer. That shows us that by working together that was the right -- Barber: I warned my son that you were going to say that to me, so -- thank you. De Weerd: I'm glad I didn't fail you. Coles: Carrie Townsend signed up in favor and does not wish to testify. Steve Brown signed up in favor of the project against pushing Hickory through and does not wish to testify. Kimberly Jensen signed up in favor of the project , indicating no through Hickory, but no testimony indication. Christine Brown signed up in favor of the project, indicating no through street at Hickory, but no testimony indication. Kenna Jensen signed up in favor of the project, no through street at Hickory, but Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 39 of 65 no testimony indication. Gary Swaggart signed up in favor of the project, no through street at Hickory, but no testimony indication. Sandy Muccia signed up in favor of the project, no through street at Hickory, but no testimony indication. And Wendy Taylor signed up in favor of the project, no through street at Hickory, but does not wish to testify. And that is all that signed up, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: Is there anyone else who would like to provide testimony? Yes, ma'am. Thank you for being here. Mecham: Thank you. Good evening to all of you. My name is Michelle Mecham. I'm at 2159 Autumn Way -- East Autumn Way. My house is the corner house to the other stub just west of the one that we are talking about on Weatherby, which we came and addressed you several years ago. The finalization of that was to have an emergency access and pedestrian access. Nothing has been done on that. My husband and I built a small bridge across the waterway there, just for bicycles and -- and pedestrians. So, what I'm wondering about in connection with our last testimony is when they say that they want to put in an emergency access and pedestrian -- do they really mean that? Are they going to go forward with those plans? Because that's exactly what they said before and nothing has happened. The reason I'm asking this is because it's now becoming needful for us to put up a fence along our property and so we are wondering about putting our fence into the easement, so that we can care for that property, controlling weeds and thistle and all of that thing, or do we put the fence really on our property and leave that huge easement uncared for? It's an issue. And as far as an emergency vehicle coming up there, it would be impossible for them to cross over that waterway the way it is right now. So, that -- I'm just questioning that. De Weerd: Can you show us perhaps, Bill, where that stub or that emergency access is? Parsons: Yeah. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, the road is actually stubbed -- the right of way is stubbed right here in the northwest corner. Mecham: But go to the west of that to the -- Parsons: The other one? Mecham: That's the stub I'm talking about. Parsons: This is the other one with Woodbridge. Mecham: Yes. De Weerd: Oh. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 40 of 65 Parsons: So, the emergency access would be here. And I'm happy to elaborate on that a little bit more for -- for the audience here as far as emergency access and why that -- typically our fire department and Parry Palmer, our fire marshal, had requested that to happen and if you look at this aerial here you can see there is a couple accesses to Eagle Road and, then, one to Franklin. If there was something that happened in this subdivision and these -- and one of these access points -- or something happened and these had to be shut off, there is no other way to get anyone out of that development. So, the fire department or somebody would have to have another way in and out of there and so he was -- our fire marshal was concerned about that and so he -- he was supportive of that happening if this ever does get blocked off or this roadway here gets blocked off, again, that's going to be a nice way to get people in and out of there. So, it's a public safety issue. De Weerd: I would thought it was more getting emergency to -- Parsons: Or in. De Weerd: -- this other location. If -- Eagle Road is often locked up and Locust Grove, that that would be a fastest route for an emergency responder , but -- I don't know. And we can't answer the one in Woodbridge. Probably is a good question for code enforcement and are planning team to answer and if you will leave your name and number we can get back with you. Mecham: Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Any further testimony? Okay. Would the applicant like to make final remarks? And maybe a remark on the emergency access. Brown: For the record, Kent Brown. 3161 East Springwood. And Bill is correct, Parry did make a comment when we submitted the Pope's Garden that they wanted an emergency access. So, when Sarah Baker made the motion for the approval she asked that it be improved. We have turned around and addressed that, that's what we would do. We have the same ditch issue. There is a ditch that runs just inside Greenhill that would need to be tiled where the crossing would be and for us paving it and making that happen. So, that's why it was originally put there was with Pope's Garden and we anticipated that that's what ACHD would be asking us to do and so we followed through. It will be a great pedestrian connection between those two and it does have to do with that -- a few years ago, because I live in the neighborhood, there was a child hit on his bike and the fire department couldn't figure out how to get in. Eagle Road was backed up, so they had a struggle trying to get into that area and, then, the same things are going to happen as more development takes place in the south, as how do you get in there and if they can't get to Eagle Road because of some accident that was there -- two years ago we had a semi truck -- the driver had a heart attack at Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 41 of 65 the St. Luke's light and went through our berm -- drove all the way through our berm, just missing our well house and blocked off the road and you couldn't travel up and down Eagle Road, so it -- to me it makes sense and it's a benefit to the community to have the emergency access. Wright: Mayor, I just wanted to publicly thank our neighbors for their support for this project. We really appreciate it. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff or the applicant or any of those that provided testimony? Okay. If there is nothing further, I would entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I move that we close the public hearing on Item 8-A, H-2017-0011. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: A good example of collaboration and communication and cooperation with the development community and the neighborhood, the Greenhill Subdivision has been very patient over the years and very active in a good way in trying to ensure the right type of development occurs here and it does it in the right way, to and including being present here tonight and providing the testimony, providing all of the -- the written testimony up through the April 14th petition, which also is very constructive and helpful to try and guide us in making a good decision and just showed continued signs of cooperation and appreciate the applicants' communications with the public and vice-versa and being here tonight. It makes sense in light of all of that that the Hickory Way connection should be limited as recommended by Planning and Zoning to the nonmotorized pedestrian emergency only access and that the two accesses and the waiver requested to allow the two accesses on Magic View, one of which would access a collector, that that appears to be appropriate as well. My two cents on it, so -- De Weerd: Thank you. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 42 of 65 Cavener: Is that a motion? Borton: I will be. Unless there is any other -- De Weerd: Any other comments? Borton: -- questions. Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I move that we approve Item 8-A, H-2017-0011, to include the applicant's comments with regards to Hickory Way and also to grant the waiver necessary to allow the two access points on Magic View. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Cavener: We don't want the road there; right? Milam: Yeah. We -- that would -- De Weerd: I think that was clearly stated in the motion that you seconded. I will say that we appreciate the discussion that was brought up with Magic View as well and what the long-term solution is. That is a pretty sharp corner and as development occurs we know that that will straighten -- straighten -- oh , my gosh that out, but I will look to ACHD and our planning staff to convene a small workgroup and you've already had a couple of volunteers tonight that -- I think that conversation is very important. Woodbridge does entertain a lot of traffic through it that is trying to get from Eagle to -- to Locust Grove that is not necessarily destined for any particular house in Woodbridge and that -- that does need to be discussed and find some remedy. So, Justin, if you can take that back to Ada County Highway District and see if we can start having conversations about that. Okay. If there is no further discussion, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, absent; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. Thank you. And thank you all. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Item 9: Department Reports Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 43 of 65 A. Police Department: Staffing Study De Weerd: Okay. We will go ahead and move into our Department Reports. Item 9-A is under our Police Department and I will turn this over to our chief. Lavey: Madam Mayor, Council, thank you for allowing us the time to present -- present this evening. As you know, I have presented to you a patrol study -- staffing study that was done internally through our staff and that was done by Beth Erickson, who is here this evening and with Sarah Kinghorn, they worked in partnership together with that -- that staffing study and they did an awesome job on it and we really wanted to validate what they did and , then, also explore can we do even better. Is there things that we can do within the department to increase our effectiveness and our efficiency, such as scheduling and should we consider some other data points and so we were quite successful in convincing you and we thank you for approving eight positions last year and you just saw six of those come before you this evening. We still have more to go and we have several in progress and it was not my intent to come back and ask for more , because that's probably the highest we have ever hired in the police department in my 20 years being here. But we did make the request to add to our professional services to hire a consultant, to do an -- to do an in-depth study and, like I said, it was to evaluate our effectiveness and efficiencies and see if there is something else out there and, then, also to look at several different staffing models that we might be able to train our internal staff on to consult. So, it's not a matter of -- of just taking a guess on what we need , it's -- we can actually show what -- what we need for our community. In essence we wanted to insure that we were doing everything we possibly could before we had to come in front of you and ask for more bodies and, then, also if we have this staffing model we can also consult to it when we are planning on how to address some of our objectives in our strategic plan of being one of the safest cities in the United States. I will tell you that the police department prides itself on the services that we provide for our community. We have a great community that's safe to live and to raise a family. It is precisely why we have a lot of people moving here. But the rapid growth has taken a toll on us and I do not like what I see . We once were a department and provided great community policing and that is not happening today. Our officers are going from call to call to call on a reactive basis . Our response times are increasing. Our area of responsibility is increasing. If you look at the Consent Agenda tonight, that is a perfect example of what we are dealing with on a continuing basis. The trend that we are seeing is not sustainable. It is my duty and my responsibility to tell you what you need to hear, not necessarily what we all would like to hear. We have a need for more people. I will tell you that crimes against persons, property, and society have all increased by double digits. I will also tell you assaults on police officers has increased 125 percent. I will also tell you that when we do our presentation you're going to see more statistics and you might not like what you see. The bottom line is that we need more bodies to get back to where we were at. That's not to improve our services, that's to get back to Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 44 of 65 the level of service that we all once had and we all enjoyed. I have a handout that I'm going to give you -- and each and every one of you. I would encourage you to look through it, but also to give as much attention as you possibly can to the consultants and with your permission I would like to bring her up here and have her give her findings. Her name is Amy Aaron and she is going to tell you a little bit about her company and where she came from and some of the work that she's done locally and, then, at the end we will make ourselves available for any questions or comments that you may have. So, Amy, if you would come forward. I think Bill is getting your presentation -- it's pulled up and I'll go ahead and give these handouts out to Council right now. And, then, Mr. Clerk, I have two additional copies if you could give -- I got one for you and if you would give them to the two absent Council members that would be great. De Weerd: Welcome, Amy. Aaron: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Council Members. My name is Amy Aaron. I am principal of Tag Line Consulting. My residence is 313 North Storybook Way in Eagle. I have been conducting business in data analysis for the last 12 years in the criminal justice, corrections, and court field. Law enforcement I have done especially a lot lately staffing studies, overtime resource, budgeting, for the Ada County Sheriff's Office -- I was their planning and research manager for nine years -- for the Ada County contract cities, Eagle, Kuna and Star. I have also worked with Eagle Fire on some staffing studies and now have had the great pleasure to work with Meridian Police. So, tonight in the handout there is a lot more background information on policing trends in Meridian over the last ten years, but what I really want to focus on tonight is I want to show you the recommended police allocation model for helping determine staffing needs for Meridian police. I am sure that none of you need to see the growth trends in Meridian. I'm sure you know them all by heart. In this nine year period here you can see that population is up 25 percent, housing 30, and crashes and citizen calls for service in an eight-year period up 90 percent. But typically the last few years is looking a little bit sharper. We do not have data from the computer aided dispatch for 2016, because there was a system change, so the information I'm going to show you today is from 2015 and earlier . During the same time period there has not been the same increase in the number of patrol officers. Up until 2012 there was a couple of officers added every year and it's been pretty flat since then. If you look at the police incident graph on the left, back in 2011 there were fewer calls for service and when you have the level of officers and fewer calls for service they have more time to spend on those proactive community- oriented policing contacts. If you look at the last three years, particularly in 2015, you see an increasing trend of the citizen calls for service , still the same number of officers, that means they have less time to spend on those proactive contacts. So, we looked at a number of different police allocation models. There are a bunch out there. Some of them are very simple to run. Some of them are very complex. Some of them are free and some of them are quite expensive . The Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 45 of 65 model that we decided to go with as a best option for Meridian Police is called the police allocation model or the PAM. This model is going to give an estimate of the total number of officers required to deliver traffic and patrol services based on four different categories. This cannot model your SROs or your detectives, it is for patrol and traffic only. So, this model incorporates over 20 factors of workload requirements, performance objectives of the agency. It includes personnel policies and it includes roadway characteristics. The roadway characteristics is particularly unique to the PAM model. Not all of them contain that that I think for a city like Meridian that's a really important consideration . It was developed in the late '80s, early '90s, with 11 different agencies. Half of them in the west, so it's very much a western focus. And Boise police was one of the development cities. So, it has direct applicability to Treasure Valley. The basis of PAM is it's a time- based model. What it does is it takes how much time it takes to do certain duties, how much percentage of the time you want your officers to spend on that, how much time they have available in a year, calculates all that up, determines the workload of the city and, then, from that determines how many officers you need to meet all those characteristics. It includes four different types. The access work that the chief was talking about, crashes and the citizen calls for service -- citizen calls for help, officers response, they generally take a fairly good amount of time and a good portion of them end in the result of -- in requiring reports. There is also uncommitted patrol time. This is the time that officers have to, essentially, drive around looking for issues, doing security checks, making sure things are okay. Administrative duties. In this model report writing is included in the call, so administrative time is basically briefing, court time, presentations, various other types of duties like that and, then, finally, those officer-initiated contacts where the officers are out there making proactive contacts with the community, traffic stops, health checks, welfare checks, security checks, all those kinds of things. A lot of that very interactive work with the community. So, as I mentioned before, the model contains over 20 factors. Some of them you can adjust and, then, the model will give you a different output and others are pretty static . So, one of the big sections is operations data. It includes shift length -- the shift length and work week. So, for the current model baseline we use their schedule, but you can use the model to look at different schedules and different shifts. Number of officers per sergeant and the percent of time sergeants should spend on field work is included. This can also be changed in the model. If you'd like to look at having a greater span of control for your sergeants or if they need more time to spend on supervisory duties versus taking calls. And, then, average time off per person per year. This was evaluated through a net annual work hours for patrol officers, corporals, and sergeants for 2011 to 2016. So, this is real data on how much an officer works per year. Very consistent across years. Very consistent across ranks. So, this is probably not going to change in the model unless you change your work week. So, as you continue to use the model in the future you will not have to redo that analysis and update that. On-duty training time. This is a ten hour shift coverage -- shift overlap training and an additional 40 hours required for officers for POST requirements. So, all of those factors are included in the model. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 46 of 65 It also includes roadway data. In this case we use 2014 data, because it was the most recent that was published. However, it's already out of date. So, if you're going to continue using the model you should update it whenever you can, especially considering the fast growth here. It includes the miles for each type. These are the COMPASS descriptions and the average uncommitted patrol speed that an officer would spend on that. So, in this case with a model with this many factors is you can make decisions that are consciously conservative and in this case the average uncommitted patrol speed was a conservative choice for the model. Pretty much on local roads, you can -- the average patrol speed is probably about 20 at any given time. But on Eagle Road it's probably unlikely that the average patrol speed is 45. It's probably a lot lower than that. So, if you would reduce that it changes your model output . But as the baseline kind of getting started using the model, the chief and the leadership wanted to go with conservative choices. One of the awesome things about this roadway and why I really like this model is that it allows agencies to select a performance goal for visibility on each of the different road types. For community-oriented policing cities, this is a really big deal. How often you see an officer in your neighborhood. So, for the performance goals for the baseline it was selected every two hours on the main roads and on the local they would want to see an officer in your neighborhood every week. Those can be changed and, then, it will tell you the change in number of officers that you will need with those changes . And, then, there is a lot of workload data that goes into the model as well. All of it is from computer-aided dispatch, the CAD, which is really solid data. We had to use data from 2013 to 2015, because of that switch, so it's already a little bit outdated, but as soon as the data gets updated you can run the model again and see if the changes are there. It takes crashes as completely separate. An officer has to respond to crashes. They take so much time. This includes all accidents and hit and runs. And, then, all other citizen calls for service that excludes administrative, excludes crashes, these are things where a citizen called 911 or called on the telephone and an officer responded and, then, the officer initiated proactive, anything that's not a crash, not administrative, where an officer had a source of radio showing that the officer checked out on a call. As I previously mentioned, 2016 data was not available and this model can handle one to three years and since this was the baseline kind of starting year, we wanted to use three years, kind of give a nice breadth. We selected 2013 to 2015 and you can see a really nice trend of increasing calls for service over those three years, from 17, to 19, to 20, with the decreasing officer initiated going with that, 33 to 29 to 25. So, very solid baseline years. It also matches up with the roadway data from 2014. So, all of the workload data that goes into it is the total number of incidents of each type . The average time on call. The percent that have a report and, then, how -- the average amount of time to write that report . Again, all of this is based on how much time it takes an officer to do things. And, then, the percent of calls that have a backup officer. We had a performance school for visibility and we also get to have a performance school for proactivity. Again, very important for community- oriented policing agencies and in this case Meridian leadership selected a Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 47 of 65 proactivity goal of 55 percent. So, slightly over half of an officer's time should be spent on doing those proactive community contacts, not just responding to calls, having the time to actually interact with the community on a different type of level. So, you have all these 20 factors that go into about, I don't know, 50 some formulas, which you can put in an Excel, which we created, and so you can change up the formulas and it will calculate. It looks a little like you're throwing numbers into a black box and you get a number out , but I assure you that all of the formulas behind make a lot of sense with how much time and how much time we want to spend. So, if we put all of this baseline data in, this is the PAM recommendation based on current conditions, based on that data that was selected for the model now. The PAM recommends 73 officers dedicated to patrol and traffic services. It does not include command staff, lieutenant and above. It does not include detectives. It recommends nine sergeants and 64 corporals and officers. Right now this means an additional seven officers for Meridian Police. With this staffing the PAM recommends -- pretty much assures that you will have the visibility of two hours on the road , one time per week in the neighborhood. You will have officers to immediately respond to any high priority calls and you will have more than half of the time available for proactive work. Of course depending on emergencies and various other things. So, just to show you comparison to two other models which are widely used, much more than the PAM. This is the COPS workload based assessment. It has only five different factors that it includes. It's based solely on citizen-initiated calls for service, not anything about proactivity or visibility, and if you look at this model it also includes time spent on a call and the amount of time they work in a year . The recommendation based on the COPS is 93 officers. So, much higher, much less conservative than the other model. The officers per thousand is widely used by almost everyone. It includes no workload data and your performance goal is essentially that you want to look like other agencies like you. So, in 2014 Meridian was about one officer per thousand. If we want to look like the other benchmark cities we would want to be up at 1.45, which means we would need 95 patrol officers. So, essentially, the PAM with the 20-plus factors, the ability to make conservative choices as -- if you want and really the transparency of all the data and all the information that goes into it, provides a much more realistic option I think than the other two. So, just a quick on how we can use this for forecasting. Pretty much this is meant to be a living model that you update with new data as you get it. So, in another year if you want to redo the model with new data , it can account for changes in policing. So, if you have new technology that reduces your report writing time, the model will incorporate that and adjust the number of officers. If you have a change in your community where you suddenly have a lot more crashes, the model can account for that and adjust to the number of officers. However, we wanted to use it forecasting it based on workload for the 2020 and 2025, just to give some thought for planning and so we updated the number of crashes, calls for service and officer-initiated contacts. Based on an average incident rate over the last ten years you have a very consistent incident rate and we use Communities In Motion population estimates and updated the miles of Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 48 of 65 roadway based on the households forecast for experience , essentially saying local roads we are going to go up at the same proportion and major roads at a third and, then, all the other model inputs were maintained at the baseline levels. So, all we are changing here is just the base workload . All the performance goals and everything else are the same. And in 2020 the PAM recommends 88 officers, which is an additional two sergeants and 13 officers on top of the ones for this year and this is because the 2040 Communities In Motion recommends a pretty big jump in population by 2020 and , then, it's a little flatter by 2025, where you would recommend 95 officers, the additional sergeants and six additional officers. Let's look at those other two models. The COPS model recommending 120 officers. The benchmark cities 115 and, then, the COPS in 2025 130 and 123 for the benchmark cities. More than 30 to 40 percent -- more than the COPS model and, really, just not realistic for growing cities. So, this is the recommendation for this year based on this typical model. If we had more time, you know, I could show you how it works and the Meridian police will certainly I'm sure use it moving into the future. So, if you have any questions for me I'd be happy to answer. Thank you. De Weerd: Any questions from Council? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Thank you for the good report. I was lucky enough to sit in on a meeting and -- and watch and see how this worked and it was -- it was fascinating really to change the numbers and everything changes and so to be a working doc ument that -- that our staff now has the ability to manipulate and -- and, you know, see where we need to be and what will change the level of service and really give us the opportunity to hit the benchmarks that were -- that we have been talking about for levels of service for so many years. I think it's a really great tool and thank you for the -- Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: A couple quick questions. You indicated in your presentation to us that Boise -- I don't know if you used the word used or is still using the PAM model. Can you clarify that for me? Aaron: So, Boise police was used as one of the base agencies to develop the model. They have not used it in recent years. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 49 of 65 Cavener: Madam Mayor, follow up? Can you share with us maybe some current law enforcement agencies that are in -- you indicated the west that are currently using this model? Aaron: Not off the top of my head. I would have to get that information for you. Cavener: Madam Mayor, maybe an additional question. I really find great value in predictive modeling in saying this is where we are, this is where we think we are headed and this is the result that we are going to need. So, if we look to the future and we say we are backyards, so I'm just curious if you have used the same data from previous years to say this is where the City of Meridian should have been and you took data from 2008 and this is where we should ha ve been in 2015 and '14 and how that pans out with the PAM model. Aaron: Uh-huh. Madam Mayor. No, I haven't done that, although that would be fascinating and something that would be really good to check on moving forward into the future. Yes. Cavener: That suffices the questions from me. Thank you. De Weerd: The cool thing about this tool is as we annex in additional developments and -- you're going to add those to the model as you can discuss maybe you don't want a police officer once a week in -- in the subdivisions, because it's too expensive. Then you can change that and the model will adjust all of that to consider, then, what is the staffing requirements at that time. So, it's it's a great tool and it can be kept current in terms of the conservative estimates and drive time for officers, even if you wanted to change that, that would be calculated in the model and you can see, then, what that would result. So, it's -- it's a tool that we can show the results of policies and decisions made by this policy group and how that impacts the expectations for level of service for our citizens. Aaron: Madam Mayor, may I add one additional thought? De Weerd: Pardon? Aaron: I said may I add one additional thought? De Weerd: Absolutely. Aaron: So, Council Member, I also would -- the Meridian police has a very sophisticated analytical services team that can actually handle this model. Most police agencies, municipal agencies, that are pretty small do not use staffing models, because they are so data heavy and require such a lot of analytical work. That's why a lot of them end up going with officers per thousand. So, certainly Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 50 of 65 Meridian police is an agency that could easily run with this -- work with this model and it would be really unique and high up to do that, use it as a planning tool. Lavey: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Chief. Lavey: So, I had a couple of comments, too, and it really goes back to maybe helping Councilman Cavener just a little bit. I have been in communication with Chief Bones of Boise, because they are struggling like we are. They are growing like crazy in their community and their staffing is not and instead of grabbing an officer per thousand, coming up with some sort of data that would support a request for more officers and so they have seen this report. They are extremely happy with the report. He was meeting with the mayor recently and I think it's probably in his hands as well and I also directed him to Amy trying to get her some more business. So, they will probably be reaching out to her, too. So, that will be another local agency. I will also share with you that the PAM model is taught in the SPSC, which is a police staff and command college for Northwestern University and a lot of our staff have -- have gone through that and we didn't have computers then and we had to struggle through hand calculations and calculators trying to understand what -- even makes it look so simple and so we didn't do it and she already answered my question and my comment was we fall back on officer per thousand, because it's simple and that's why most agencies do it, as it takes no staff time to come up with it, it's a simple computer calculation and have your answer. But we have always had that question and the Mayor and I have had this discussion and -- and others is Meridian is unique. We are not high crime and we often get accused of having too many officers, but we don't have to have as many officers in our community that you might have to in other communities. Therefore, we wanted to take a really conservative approach and that's -- that's what we have done here and one of the comments that the Mayor and I discussed this morning and I wanted to share with you is that we are not in a crisis, we are not in a state of panic, and we can continue to do what we do as best as we do with the resources that we have. But it's not sustainable and something's going to change and we are already starting to see that and if we are comfortable with that as a community, then, we go on. But it's not where we have been in as a community and so it makes the discussion where do we want to be and so we were able to sit at a computer and calculate how many times officers are on arterials and collectors and in neighborhoods and we come up with once a week . I would guess that our citizens expect us to be in their neighborhoods more based upon our recent e-mails and some -- some burglaries that we have gotten and some questions and comments and concerns that we have gotten, but the question is are they willing to pay for it. It comes with a cost. But with this model we can sit there and say, okay, if we are going to put them in -- if we are going to put a car in your neighborhood four times per week, we plug it in and it spits out a calculation and tells you how many officers you're going to need. So, we are Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 51 of 65 really excited about it and like Amy said is we have qualified staff internally that can maintain this in the future. So, I hope that answers more of your question. Cavener: Madam Mayor, if I can respond. Chief , I appreciate that and I hope that I wasn't attempting to besmirch the -- the report of the fine work that has went into this, but when I see information like this I think it becomes a decision-making tool for our Council and I think it's important that if it is a decision-making tool for the Council that we are doing our due diligence to make sure that the particular modelling is correct and accurate and, quite frankly, when I see such a low number compared to other numbers that are out there, it's surprises me and I want to make sure that we are setting our department -- our community up for success, so that at the halfway mark this model has changed so significantly that you're saying, well, we need more officers and Councilman Bird won't be here to say you told us this, you know, five years ago. So, that -- that's where my concern is from is that we are making sure that the data is accurate , that it's being used by other agencies that have found similar results before we necessarily jump on board and say this is our determining tool is all. Lavey: Madam Mayor, Councilman Cavener -- and I didn't take it any other way other than that, so I appreciate it. I actually took it as -- as you were quite inquizative in nature and so we just decided that this was going to be a starting point for the discussion and we can play the what-ifs and through those numbers come in here and crank them out and that's the awesome thing about this tool. And, then, we can sit there and say, ooh, that's -- that's too much or let's -- let's phase this. Those are the discussions that we could have and I'm fairly confident you're going to start seeing that in -- in more Ada County agencies. I do know that Nampa is also going through a staffing study, but they brought someone in out of Seattle area and I do not know what sort of -- of model that they are using. Cavener: Madam Mayor? Could I get a digital copy of this? Lavey: I can give you, actually, the -- the presentation and the double study and I will just forward it to you. Cavener: Thank you. Lavey: And anybody else that wants it. Okay. I can do everybody. De Weerd: Other questions? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 52 of 65 Borton: Amy, can you also include a variable to extrapolate necessary management for added patrol? Aaron: Beyond sergeants? Borton: Correct. Aaron: No. Borton: Lieutenants. Aaron: They do have a component in there for looking at lieutenants and above, but it's pretty much very simple how many lieutenants do you think you need for each sergeant group and that kind of thing. It's based more on area of focus than the number of officers once you get to that management level in the model. So, no. Borton: Okay. Thanks. De Weerd: Well, certainly this is really the start of a conversation and I imagine it can be something that Council can stew over that and it will probably be an item of conversation during the -- the budget workshops as well. But, please, get your your questions to the chief and -- and there is a lot of work that went into this and we appreciate everyone that has been involved . I -- I think it's a great tool that you can run a number of different scenarios with that you can actually, then, see how your suggestions can impact those numbers and -- and where you want it to be and you can determine the why with the conversation with our team. So, it it gives you a decision-making tool that is just -- just that, it's a tool. It's not something you will be held to, but it helps with the conversation and the reasons why. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: But what I like about this tool is that it -- it uses real data. It uses the information of how many incidents we had and how long it takes for each incident and so it's taking actual data and -- we could put in there what-ifs and see what would happen if -- if it took less time or more time or we had more officers or less calls or whatever, but that way that the report was done was based on actual data from actual calls and the actual amount of time that it takes for each call and so that's what I like about it and then -- then you can look at where you -- where efficiencies are possible. What can -- if we did this or change this would that -- would that really change the whole picture and -- and allow us to have less officers if we -- you know, just changing a certain way that we do something that Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 53 of 65 would save a lot of time. So, it's -- there is a lot of -- a lot of ways you can be creative with it as well. De Weerd: Well, I think the chief made a good point. We have been struggling with how do you really determine the appropriate numbers of our officers and the per thousand just didn't feel right. We went at one time to miles coverage and that didn't necessarily feel right either, because we are dealing with the Treasure Valley's traffic and so it didn't really have a connection or it wasn't relevant to necessarily the population, so this is a different way of looking at it and using the the work that are our crime analysts do in plugging it in and -- and giving us a better model for -- for these discussions. So, we appreciate your work and all of those that were involved and we will continue to have these conversations moving forward. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: This is really, really well done. I love the data and the detail. And when I look on the top of page ten, we have addressed levels of service in the fire department with regards to response times and I looked at the top of page ten and the pie chart as in one sense being a level of service goal that might be a recommendation from the chief that we adhere to, whether that comes forward some day -- sometime in the future to adopt, but percentage of time allocated towards those three job duties, one in particular being the officer-initiated contacts, it sounds like something we need to make sure we continue to emphasize and maintain. Unless I'm reading that -- that wrong, it sounds like that's what this is premised upon, assuming we are going to abide by those expected levels of service in those three areas, this is a staff level to meet that, which sounds great, because that's level of service based planning and budgeting, what we are trying to steer towards, so -- Lavey: Madam Mayor, Councilman Borton, you are absolutely correct. We took the liberty of making some decisions on your own as far as how long we thought it would take to do a report, how long we expected our officers to be out in the field on uncommitted times for proactive policing versus administrative time, but we can adjust those as well. If we -- if we feel that, well, we don't need officers quite as visible as -- as they are, we can -- we can -- we can adjust that. So, we took a very conservative approach. But that's the awesome thing about this is we can manipulate it whatever way we want. So, if you asked a question, well, what happens if we do this, we plug it in and, then, we give you the answer right there. So, we don't have to be committed to this is the way we are going to do it every single year, because we actually couldn't afford that. But when we do decide to move forward we move forward with accurate data why we are doing what we are doing. So, the one thing about it -- and Amy said this -- is that some of the data Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 54 of 65 that we had to use is old data. So, we already know that. We have had an explosive growth and so when we go in and plug in the additional roadways that are currently not on any maps that's been recorded yet, we may be facing more need than the seven, but we just don't know that yet. As it comes in we update it and that's what we go on. You also asked a question about patrol lieutenants and I will flat out tell you this is -- this is how we operate. We have two patrol lieutenants. We have a daytime lieutenant and a nighttime lieutenant to cover 80 hours a week out of 188 hours in a work week. We have a need to have two additional lieutenant -- two additional lieutenants. The idea behind that would be a daytime weekday, nighttime weekday, daytime weekend, nighttime weekend. We think that makes sense. It's a common sense approach. It's not saying we need to have 12. But what Amy was saying is that we just -- then we look at span of control and the span of control is anywheres between five, seven and nine and generally if you have difficult or time -consuming people to supervise, you're going to want to have less people. If you're out -- if a lieutenant is out there supervising veteran sergeants perhaps they can do seven or nine versus brand new ones that you may only be able to do three or five. So, that's the approach that -- that we are talking about right now. We have a plan that you may see soon, but we also have as tiered approach as well. So, we will bring that in a discussion to you when it comes into the workshop. Borton: Madam Mayor? Chief, would it be helpful -- not tonight necessarily, but -- and the tool can be used to -- based upon the officers that we have, to kick out the product of the division of their time, like the top of page ten, or is the alternative really the better approach for the Council to come to some consensus on what's our -- our hoped for allocation of time? If it's officer-initiated contact, whether it's 45 percent, 55 percent, or some figure that we strive to maintain, which would, then, drive staffing decisions from there. Lavey: Madam Mayor, Councilman Borton, I thought somewhere in that presentation that you have you're going to see what we are currently getting based upon our -- our people that we currently have. The divisions in there. Borton: Yeah. Lavey: So, I don't know if it really makes sense to go back and look at that again. I guess what I would do is I would say look at the outcomes that I put in the front of your booklet there of what we have received or our outcomes we have had for this last year and the question is if we don't add more that's what you're going to see and are you comfortable with that. So, I don't know if it really needs to go back and say what are we getting with the people we got -- there is a few -- it's not completely an apples-to-apples comparison, because you do know that we have had open positions and we haven't been able to fill them as quickly as we possibly could and we have had some officer injures that's kept them on light duty for a while. So, had we been full staffed and -- would we have the same results. No, Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 55 of 65 we wouldn't. We would have a little bit better results. So, it's not a complete comparison, but also we can't sit here and tell each of us tomorrow that we are not going to grow anymore. We already know we are going to grow more. So, we already know what we are facing. The time is to just put a plan in place to address it as it -- as it comes --comes forward. So, hopefully we can manage that growth a little bit more responsibly. Borton: Okay. De Weerd: At least knowing what we need to do to continue a level of service . Thank you. If there is no further questions, Council? Thank you very much. So, chief, I guess just one last question is, you know, we have -- we don't figure in the SROs, yet when it's summertime we do have them on bike patrol and -- and so they can in some regards help with the community-oriented policing. Same with the impact team and that -- but I guess the bottom line question is do we want more of the community -- the COPS, the community oriented policing, and we can see in the number that as those numbers of officer-initiated actions have -- have decreased while the crime has increased, so that prevention piece seems to be important. Lavey: Madam Mayor and Council -- also isn't SROs accounted in that number of officers, though? They are not? Okay. De Weerd: No. See, I was paying attention, chief. Lavey: I heard what she said, too, but I thought it was calculated a little bit differently. De Weerd: I know. I'm just giving you a hard time. Lavey: No. That's -- that's good. Madam Mayor, Council, one of the things that we also see, though, is that when those officers become available we already see an increase in crime. So, when it warms up and school's out, we see an increase in crime. So, I don't know how that -- that compares, but you're absolutely correct in that when we can utilize those resources we put them to good use and those -- those SROs do work the bikes, they do work the -- the street and they do work juvenile crimes and detective. So, we do have a balance during those -- those times. But that's three months out of a 12 month year as well, so -- and, Madam Mayor, I also saw that Councilman Borton's head was turning. I could see the -- the mechanism in there crunching the numbers and so I hope we gave you enough data to play with. I also believe I just forwarded you the presentat ion and the staffing study. I did not forward it to Councilman Palmer or Councilman Bird, because I didn't want them to be confused about what we were doing . So, when you think it's appropriate someone just forward that -- that digital copy to them as well. And, then, Bill, if you could just take -- no. Well, either way. Either take a Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 56 of 65 digital copy for the clerk or I gave you a hard copy as well, so whatever you feel -- awesome. B. Police Department: Consolidated Records Management System Agreement De Weerd: Good job. Okay. Next item. Lavey: Madam Mayor, Council, Lieutenant Stokes and I actually had an -- an agreement today. He said that you sit in the comfy chair and you do all the work and, then, I will stay for the Executive Session. So, if you have a multiple hour Executive Session tonight that wouldn't break my heart at all. No. See if he is still paying attention. Madam Mayor and Council, this is Item No. 9-B, consolidated records management system agreement. That's a whole lot of words to say that it doesn't mean much. This is business as usual for us and not to get back into the weeds too much, but as you recall we have a contract with New World -- the county and others explored going to Tri Tech. They are not ready to go to Tri Tech yet. They are staying with New World. This just keeps us on that contract as a New World contract. The good news is it's zero cost to the city. So, all we need is a signature saying we agreed to continue business as usual , as long as we maintain this, that we do not have to pay the contract. So, it's really ultimately good news for us. Lastly, about ten months ago or so I came in front of you for a a budget amendment so we could continue on the New World contract on her own. That hasn't been needed and that money has not been spent , so it's been diverted back into the General Fund. Some day, if the county ever goes to Tri Tech and we maintain our New World contract, then, I will have to come in front of you again and ask for them that -- that money once again. But for the last year or so it's been free of charge. So, just asking for -- for the authority for the Mayor to to sign that contract. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we approve the consolidated record management systems agreement as presented. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Mr. Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, absent; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent; Little Roberts, yea. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 57 of 65 De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. Thank you. And thank you all. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. De Weerd: Lieutenant Stokes, I would have just done the presentation, because you never know how long we will be in Executive Session. Lavey: Madam Mayor, he could have just snuck out while my back was turned to him, too, and I would have been stuck here, so -- C. Police Department: Memorandum of Understanding between Boise Police, Garden City Police and City of Meridian Police De Weerd: Item 9-C is also under the Police Department. Lavey: Madam Mayor, Council, this will be the last item you hear from the police this evening. This is a memorandum of understanding between the Boise Police Department and Garden City Police Department and the Meridian Police Department. This is nothing new. We have had it for at least 15 years through multiple chiefs and as you recall Boise and Garden City have recently -- fairly recently got new chiefs and we discovered that new chiefs, no new update to MOU, and so this is just a memorandum of understanding that grants us law enforcement duties in each other's jurisdictions if requested. Liability still maintains upon the employing agency. It's been reviewed by all three legal counsels and so the only thing that's new is it's going to have new updated signatures and we are just requesting permission to have that signed as well. De Weerd: And they all there agreed? Wow. Lavey: It did take a while, but yes. De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we approve the memorandum of understanding between Boise police, Garden City police and the City of Meridian police. Little Roberts: Second. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 58 of 65 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 9 -C. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, absent; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Lavey: Madam Mayor, Council, thank you for your time this evening. D. Parks and Recreation: FY2017 Budget Amendment for Movie Night Projector Purchase Not-to-Exceed $10,000 De Weerd: Thank you. Item 9-D is under our Parks Department and, Colin, you out lasted everyone else. Moss: Well, yes. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I am extremely pleased to be here tonight to present this budget amendment. It is a net zero cost to the city. So, Movie Night in Meridian, we have just completed -- not just, but we completed our 10th season last year. So, entering season 11 coming this year, which means that we had an expired contract with Cable ONE, who had two give they have done two five-year title sponsorship deals for that program and so they have agreed to continue on for another five years and part of those five years deals in the first two times were to purchase our movie screens. We are not in need of a new movie screen this time around. One of the things that we are in need of, though, is a new -- is a projector. We have struggled over the years to find consistent quality projection based with the money that we have available for through sponsorships and concessions revenue and so as Renee and I were brainstorming ways to use this Cable ONE sponsorship, this kind of rose to the top as a way that we can guarantee the quality of our Movie Night program for -- for the foreseeable future. Hopefully forever, because the projector that we are going to be able to get for this money is -- is a very high quality projector. It's got new laser technology that they don't have the bulbs that will overheat a projector or need changing over time and so we are extremely excited . Renee and I demoed this projector a couple -- couple weeks ago, set up the movie screen and the whole nine yards and we were able to see what it looks like out there at Settlers Park and so Cable ONE we have a check in hand for 10,000 dollars and we would just like permission to spend that 10,000 dollars on a new projector and lens for us to use at Movie Night moving forward. De Weerd: Thanks, Colin. Get to start the day with you and end it with you. That's awesome. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 59 of 65 Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Any questions? Yes, Mrs. Milam. Milam: Colin, next time you're going to have a private movie screening I think you should invite all of us, go down to the park and have a -- Moss: Madam Mayor, Council Member Milam, it was nothing -- it was nothing like a private screening a couple weeks ago . We did not have any speakers at -- at the movie and we only viewed some previews and a short part of Hotel Transylvania. Milam: I'm just teasing. De Weerd: And was it snowing when you -- Moss: Fortunately, Renee picked an excellent night for us to -- to demo these and we were able to demo a couple projectors and so we had two different pictures up side by side. We demoed an 8,000 lumen projector and a 10,000 lumen projector. The 10,000 lumen projector -- I mean they were both great. It would have been great to get the 10,000 lumen projector, but it was too expensive and the 8,000 lumen will do -- will suffice really, really nicely. We are extremely excited to not have to fight the -- what projector are we getting this week situation that we have had for the past several years. Milam: That's fantastic. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Colin, correct me if I'm wrong, but in the past you have partnered with a business to handle the projection. Is that accurate? Moss: Correct. Cavener: And so how does the projector that you're hoping to purchase compare with -- on average what we have received from that vendor? Moss: Sure. Madam Mayor, Council Member Cavener, we have -- we have projected with -- or we have partnered with Rocky Mountain Audio Visual for several years and it's been a -- it's been an interesting relationship, because they have a 12K projector, but it -- it's got bulb -- it's got bulbs in it and so the way that the bulb projectors work is they are -- don't stay -- they start getting dimmer as Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 60 of 65 they go. It's not like that the lights in your house where they stay on at the same brightness until they just go out. Cavener: Sure. Moss: They start getting dimmer from the moment you start -- you fire them up the very first time and so we have had -- we have been able to get the 12K. It wouldn't -- it wouldn't be a 12K level that's brand new, but we have been able to get a projector that's -- that's good enough. They have never been able to guarantee that projector. They only have one and they have never been able to guarantee that projector and in recent years the amount that we have been paying to them, they balked at the idea of providing that -- that quality of a projector at the cost that we have been -- that we have been paying them and so we have been routinely getting more like five or six K projectors that are bulb projectors and if anybody has been to Movie Night, you know, there has been times when, you know, it's been not good and I have not been pleased with the quality of the picture on the screen and I'm sure there is a lot of people in the -- in the -- in the crowd that have felt the same way and so, you know, this is an 8,000 lumen projector and so it's not anything -- you know, it's not -- it's not a huge number, but it's -- it's new laser technology. It's a laser projector where there is no bulbs to replace. There is -- you know, over time there's probably going to be some -- some maintenance that goes along with it, but this is a something that stays the same quality throughout and so there is no , you know, dimming of the bulbs over time and deciding when to -- when to replace those based on our budget. You know, it's going to be -- it's going to be something that's going to be crisp and clear every single night and based on the amount of time -- you know, we were using it for 13 shows per year, whereas, you know a rental company is using it who knows how many times per year and so the amount of time that we are going to be using it -- we are hoping that the maintenance costs are going to be almost nothing over -- over the course of the next ten or 20 years of Movie Night, you know, fingers crossed. So, we are very excited. De Weerd: Okay. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: First of all, Colin, I would like to say thank you for you due diligence in researching projectors and making sure that we are getting the biggest -- best bang for our buck and thank you to Cable ONE for their sponsorship and with that I would like to move that we proceed with purchasing the protector not to exceed 10,000 dollars. Cavener: Second. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 61 of 65 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, absent; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Moss: Thank you. Item 10: Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 17-1725: An Ordinance (H-2017-0009) Amending Meridian City Code as Codified at Title 11, Section 3 Entitled Unified Development Code of the Meridian City Code Pertaining to Sign Requirements; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing for an effective date. De Weerd: Item 10-A is ordinance 17-1725. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, read this by title. Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 17-1725, an Ordinance file number H-2017-0009, amending Meridian City Code as codified at Title 11, Section 3 entitled Unified Development Code of the Meridian City Code, pertaining to sign requirements; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing for an effective date. De Weerd: Council, you have heard the reading by title. Would you like to make a motion, please. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we approve Ordinance No., 17-1725 with suspension of rules. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 10 -A. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 62 of 65 Roll Call: Bird, absent; , yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. B. Ordinance No. 17-1726: An Ordinance (H-2016-0128) for the Re-zone of a Parcel of Land Situated within the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; Establishing and Determining and the Land Use Zoning Classification from the R-2 (Low Density Residential) to R-4(Medium-Low Density Residential)(10.17 acres); R-8 (Medium Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium-Low Density Residential)(33.84 acres); R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium-Low Density Residential)(.25 acres); C-C (Community Business) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(.27 acres); and R-15 (Medium-High Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(154 s.f.) zoning districts, in the Meridian City Code; Providing that Copies of this Ordinance Shall be Files with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County please Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as Required by Law; And Providing for a Summary of the Ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; And Providing an Effective Date. De Weerd: Item 10-B is Ordinance 17-1726. Mr. Clerk. Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 17-1726: An Ordinance, file number H-2016-0128, for the re-zone of a parcel of land situated within the west 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; establishing and determining and the Land Use Zoning Classification from the R-2, Low Density Residential, to R-4, Medium-Low Density Residential, 10.17 acres;R-8, Medium Density Residential, to R-4, Medium-Low Density Residential, 33.84 acres; R-15, Medium-High Density Residential, to R-4, Medium-Low Density Residential, .25 acres; C-C, Community Business, to R-8, Medium Density Residential, .27 acres; and R-15, Medium-High Density Residential, to R-8, Medium Density Residential.154 s.f., zoning districts, in the Meridian City Code; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder, Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 63 of 65 and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing for a summary of the ordinance; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing an effective date. De Weerd: You have heard this read by title. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Could I have a motion? Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 17-1726 with suspension of rules. Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 10 -B. Mr., Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, absent; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Item 11: Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(d) To Consider Records that are Exempt from Disclosure as Provided in Chapter 1, Title 74, Idaho Code De Weerd: Item 11 is Executive Session. Do I have a motion to adjourn. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Move that we move into Executive Session pursuant to Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(d). Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn into Executive Session. Mr. Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, absent; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, absent; Little Roberts, yea. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 64 of 65 De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (9:01 p.m. to 9:38 p.m.) Borton: I move that we come out of Executive Session. Milam: Second. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to come out of Executive Session. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. De Weerd: Council, as far as upcoming events, Mayor's Walking Club is at Paramount Elementary, Campus Charter, and Prospect, all on Thursday. Love to see you come out. We had a good turnout today. Half of it was in rain and other half was in sun, all at the same place. So, that's Idaho weather. Four season s in one day, we got summer and spring. Food Frenzy fundraiser for MYAC is this Friday in the City Hall Plaza. It's a fundraiser for SPAN, which is the Suicide Prevention Action Network and Unplugged and Be Outside kickoff is Saturday, the 22nd, from 11:00 to 3:00 in Storey Park. And, then, finally, just a reminder that next Wednesday we have our Unplugged town hall meeting. We have already gotten a couple of questions from the public and so we would love to have you there at Cole Valley Christian at 6:30. So, with that I would -- Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I move that we adjourn. Cavener: Second. Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:39 P.M. Meridian City Council April 18, 2017 Page 65 of 65 AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) V 1-7 MA-B€-A.EELD DATE APPROVED ATTEST: C. JAY COLES, WY CLERK 1f1.of d I j W m pAH N 2 SEAL .> / Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approve Minutes of April 4, 2017 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes MEETING NOTES M" APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council April 4, 2017 Page 105 of 105 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:25 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) / / / 1 MAYOR Tt�/41W DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTEST: C. JAY COLF,8, CITY CLERK Go�QORATEO A�CGS W�(4vo/' cD �I W \IANi Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5B PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approve Minutes of April 11, 2017 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes MEETING NOTES F1 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Workshop April 11, 2017 Page 29 of 30 Bird: I move we go into Executive order as per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(f). Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn into Executive Session. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (4:27 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.) De Weerd: Okay. I would entertain a motion to come out of Executive Session. Bird: So moved. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Council, I have here senior resource guides that were put together from our Mayor's senior advisory board through the CDBG and so just to let you know peruse that and make sure you let our citizens know that this is available as well. It will be online as well, so -- in addition to the hard copy that is -- it will be available online. I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Bird: So moved. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:30 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR TA DE WEERD DATE APPROVED Meridian City Council Workshop April 11, 2017 Page 30 of 30 ATTEST: C. JAY CHOLES, (CITY CLERK o�QOjp,TED AUGUST 2� wc uy of C%Q�E IDIAN�-- IDAHO - SEAL A) Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5C PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0024 ITEM TITLE: TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 Final Order for TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 (H-2017-0024) by SCS Brighton, LLC Located Southeast Corner of W. Franklin Road and S. Ten Mile Road MEETING NOTES rte✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TM CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 – FP H-2017-0024 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: MARCH 28, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF NINE (9) BUILDING LOTS AND TWO (2) COMMON LOTS ON 9.63 ACRES OF LAND IN THE C-G ZONING DISTRICT FOR TM CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2. BY: SCS BRIGHTON, LLC APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2017-0024 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on March 28, 2017 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING TM CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2, LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ¼ OF THE NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2017, HANDWRITTEN DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 2017, by JAMES R. WASHBURN, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 4,” is ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TM CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 – FP H-2017-0024 Page 2 of 3 conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated March 28, 2017, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Michael Wardle, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of AP ri )2017. B (Ofthe pTED AVG�sde e rd 11 MayorTammyC t f Meridian Attest: E�IIDIAN�IDAHO CJ Cole SEALe�City Clerk TREPSV� Copy served upon the Applicant; Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: �? y Dated: 1/Z /" (/ K/'7 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TM CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 — FP H-2017-0024 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March 28, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – H-2017-0024 I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, SCS Brighton, LLC, has applied for final plat (FP) approval of 9 building lots and 2 common area lots on 9.63 acres of land in a C-G zoning district for the second phase of TM Creek Subdivision. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 final plat based on the analysis provided below in Section V. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval I move to approve File Number H-2017-0024 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of March 28, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial I move to deny File Number H-2017-0024, as presented during the hearing on March 28, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0024 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The subject property is located at the southeast corner of W. Franklin Road and S. Ten Mile Road, in Section 14, T. 3N., R. 1W. B. Applicant: SCS Brighton, LLC 12601 W. Explorer Dr. #200 Boise, ID 83713 C. Owner: Same as applicant EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 2 D. Representative: Michael D. Wardle, Brighton Corporation 12601 W. Explorer Dr. #200 Boise, ID 83713 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts 9 building lots and 2 common area lots on 9.63 acres of land in a C-G zoning district. Development is required to comply with the dimensional standards of the C-G zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat for compliance with the aforementioned dimensional standards and found the plat to be in compliance with those standards. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for consistency with the approved preliminary plat and found there are 5 fewer lots shown on the final plat than were depicted on the preliminary plat. Because the number of building lots have decreased and the amount of open space is the same, staff finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat per the standards listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. VI. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation (AZ-13-015, Development Agreement Instrument #114045759); and preliminary plat (PP-13-030). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat for Phase I (on or before June 3, 2018); or, apply for a time extension on the preliminary plat in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by The Land Group, stamped on 2/16/17 by James R. Washburn, shown in Exhibit C shall be revised as follows: a. Notes 11, 13, 14 and 16: Include the recorded instrument numbers. b. Note 17: “Direct lot or parcel access to S. Ten Mile Road and W. Franklin Road is prohibited except for those access points approved with PP-13-030 by the City of Meridian and ACHD.” c. Depict a 35-foot street buffer along S. Ten Mile Road and a 25-foot wide street buffer along W. Franklin Road within a common lot or a permanent dedicated buffer maintained by the property owner or business owner’s association in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2. d. Include the recorded instrument numbers for the ACHD easement graphically depicted on Sheet 2. 5. The landscape plan prepared by The Land Group, dated February 2, 2017, shown in Exhibit D, is approved as submitted. 6. The applicant shall submit a minimum 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement for the multi-use pathway within this phase to the Planning Division for approval by City Council and recordation prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall coordinate with Elroy Huff, the City Arborist, (888-3579) prior to removal of any existing trees on the site. Mitigation may be required for any trees removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-10C. EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 3 8. The Tenmile Creek shall be protected during construction. 9. All fencing installed on the site shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6 and 11- 3A-7. If permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release of building permits for this subdivision. 10. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. 11. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. 12. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The City of Meridian owns and operates a reclaimed water system along the West Franklin Road frontage of this parcel. Applicant shall be bound to the same requirements that were worked out for the first phase regarding the use of reclaimed water for the provision of landscape irrigation water. 13. Applicant is responsible for the extension of the Ten Mile Trunk Sewer across this site. The developer and their design team have actively been working out the specific alignment and size with the Public Works Department. VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887- 2211. EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 4 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, water, fencing, and pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy, or as otherwise allowed by UDC 11-5C-1. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. 100 Watt and 250 Watt, high-pressure sodium street lights shall be required on all public roadways per the City of Meridian Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. Street lighting is required at intersections, corners, cul-de-sacs, and at a spacing that does not exceed that outlined in the Standards. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description, which must include the EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 5 area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. Easements must be submitted and approved prior receiving development plan approval. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. V. EXHIIBITS A. Vicinity Map B. Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 5/8/14) C. Proposed Final Plat (dated: 2/16/17) D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 2/2/17) EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 6 Exhibit A – Vicinity Map EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 7 Exhibit B – Approved Preliminary Plat EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 8 Exhibit C – Proposed Final Plat (dated: 2/16/17) EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 9 Exhibit D – Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 2/2/17) EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 10 EXHIBIT A TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 – FP H-2017-0024.doc PAGE 11 1 MV -5 11 110110 8• Sonya Allen From: Mike Wardle <mwardle@brig htoncorp.com> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 11:24 AM To: Sonya Allen Cc: Bruce Freckleton; Jon Wardle Subject: RE: TM Creek Sub. 2 - FP H-2017-0024 Staff Report for March 28th Council Mtg Sonya, We have reviewed the TM Creek Subdivision No. 2 staff report and concur with the recommended conditions of approval. I will attend the March 28th Council hearing to respond to questions, if any. Michael Wardle Director of Planning Brighton Corporation 12601 W. Explorer, Suite 200 1 Boise, Idaho 83713 Direct 208.287.0512 1 Cell 208.863.6150 From: Sonya Allen [mailto:sallen@meridiancib org] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:03 PM To: Mike Wardle Cc: Bruce Freckleton; Jon Wardle Subject: TM Creek Sub. 2 - FP H-2017-0024 Staff Report for March 28th Council Mtg Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for TM Creek Sub. 2. This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on March 28th. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Mike - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (mhitt@meridiancity.org cjcoles@meridiancity.org, cwaV@meridiancity.or , bshiffer@meridiancity.orp and myself (e-mail or fax) by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda for discussion. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday at 3:00 pm, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda. Thanks, Sonya Allen I Associate City Planner City of Meridian I Community Development Department 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste.. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 ( Direct: 208-489-05781 Fax: 208-489-0578 E IDIAN Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5D PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0025 ITEM TITLE: Silverwater South Final Order for Silverwater South (H-2017-0025) by Trilogy Development Located South of E. Victory Road Midway Between S. Meridian and S. Locust Grove Roads MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR SILVERWATER SOUTH SUBDIVISION – FP H-2017-0025 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: MARCH 28, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF FORTY EIGHT (48) BUILDING LOTS AND FOUR (4) COMMON LOTS ON 12.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ZONING DISTRICT FOR SILVERWATER SOUTH SUBDIVISION. BY: TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2017-0025 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on March 28, 2017 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING SILVERWATER SOUTH SUBDIVISION, SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2017, HANDWRITTEN DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2017, by MICHAEL S. BYRNS, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR SILVERWATER SOUTH SUBDIVISION – FP H-2017-0025 Page 2 of 3 PLS, SHEET 1 OF 6,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated March 28, 2017, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Scott Wonders, JUB Engineers, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the f day of IN v ,I_ 52017. a� w Attest: City of �E IDIAN�- IDAHO SEAL C.J Cole T��olthe TREPSV�� City Clerk By: \Tammy deerd Mayor, Ci of Meridian Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. � y ` By: S' �/ 60-C4 Dated: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR SILVERWATER SOUTH SUBDIVISION — FP H-2017-0025 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: March 28, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: Silverwater South Subdivision – FP (H-2017-0025) I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Trilogy Development, has applied for final plat (FP) approval of 48 building lots and 4 common lots on 12.08 acres of land in an R-8 (medium density residential) zoning district for Silverwater South Subdivision. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Silverwater South Subdivision final plat based on the analysis provided below in Section V. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval I move to approve File Number H-2017-0025 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of March 28, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial I move to deny File Number H-2017-0025, as presented during the hearing on March 28, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0025 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The subject property is located south of E. Victory Road midway between S. Meridian Road and S. Locust Grove Road, in the NE ¼ of Section 30, T. 3N., R. 1E. B. Applicant: Trilogy Development 9839 W. Cable Car St., Ste. 101 Boise, ID 83709 C. Owner: Viper Investments, LLC 1977 E. Overland Road Meridian, ID 83642 EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 2 D. Representative: Scott Wonders, J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Ste. 201 Boise, ID 83709 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts 48 building lots and 4 common lots on 12.08 acres of land in an R-8 zoning district. A total of 1.2 acres of qualified open space with internal pedestrian pathways as a site amenity is proposed for this development. Because the number of building lots is the same and the amount of qualified open space has not changed from what was approved with the preliminary plat, Staff deems the proposed final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. VI. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation (AZ-06-015, Development Agreement Instrument #106151214 and addendum #108065958) and preliminary plat (H-2016-0082). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by October 4, 2018, within two (2) years of City Council approval of the preliminary plat; or, apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized, as well as the Certification of the Central District Health Department and the Ada County Highway District. 4. The final plat prepared by J-U-B Engineers, Inc., stamped on 2/23/2017 by Michael S. Byrns shall be revised as follows: a. Notes: i. Note #10: Include the ACHD license agreement number. ii. Add a note: “The bottom elevation of all structural footings shall be set a minimum of 12-inches above the highest established normal ground water elevation.” b. Easement Notes: i. Note #4: The graphic depiction for the easement doesn’t appear to be correct (depicting the easement in a cross-hatch or pattern symbol would help). ii. Note #5: Include recorded instrument number for existing ACHD right-of-way easements. c. On Sheet 3, Block 2 is shown incorrectly as Block 3; revise accordingly. 5. The landscape plan prepared by J-U-B Engineers dated 5/31/16, shall be revised as follows: a. Fencing is required adjacent to all pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas; depict fencing as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7. b. Include tree class in Plant Schedule. c. Parkways are required to be constructed in accord with UDC 11-3A-17E. If 6-foot wide parkways are proposed, root barriers are required; depict a cross section of the parkway that demonstrates compliance with this standard. EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 3 6. All drainage swales shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11C, Stormwater Integration. 7. All fencing installed on the site must comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6 and 11- 3A-7. 8. This development is subject to pay $1,465.56 per acre, to proportionally offset costs incurred by the City of Meridian for the Victory Road Gap Sewer Project. Said payment must be received prior to obtaining the City Engineer’s signature on each final plat. 9. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. 10. A Street Light Plan will be required with the submittal of the civil construction plans. Plan requirements can be found in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272 VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 4 Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 5 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. V. EXHIIBITS A. Vicinity/Zoning Map B. Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 6/15/16) C. Proposed Final Plat (dated: 2/23/17) D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 5/31/16) EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 6 Exhibit A – Vicinity/Zoning Map EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 7 Exhibit B – Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 6/15/16) EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 8 Exhibit C – Proposed Final Plat (dated: 2/23/17) EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 9 EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 10 EXHIBIT A Silverwater South - FP (H-2017-0025) PAGE 11 Exhibit D –Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 5/31/16) Sonya Allen EXHIBIT B From: Scott Wonders <swonders@jub.com> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 1:24 PM To: Sonya Allen; Machelle Hill; C.Jay Coles; Charlene Way; Barbara Shiffer Cc: Shawn Brownlee (shawn@trilogyidaho.com); Bruce Freckleton Subject: RE: Silverwater South - FP H-2017-0025 Staff Report for Council Mtg on March 28th Sonya We are in agreement with the staff report/conditions of approval and have no comments. Scott W. Scott Wonders, PE Land Development Group Lead J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 1208 376 7330 a I swonders@iub.com c 1208 860 1623 THE J -U -B FAMILY OF COMPANIES: www,iub.com I www.gatewaymapping.com I www.langdongroupinc.com From: Sonya Allen[mailto:sallen@meridiancity.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 4:44 PM To: Scott Wonders <swonders(@iub.com> Cc: Shawn Brownlee (shawn@trilogyidaho.com) <shawn@trilogyidaho.com>; Bruce Freckleton <bfreckleton@meridiancity.org> Subject: Silverwater South - FP H-2017-0025 Staff Report for Council Mtg on March 28th Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Silverwater South. This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on March 28th. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda for discussion. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday at 3:00 pm, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5E PROJECT NUMBER: H-2016-0128 ITEM TITLE: Tree Farm Subdivision Development Agreement for Tree Farm Subdivision (H-2016-0128) with Drew Eggers (owner) and M3 Companies, LLC (Developer) located at 4740 W. Chinden Blvd., in the SW 1/4 Section 22, Township 4N., Range 1 W MEETING NOTES u✓ APPROIED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035132 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=50 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/21/2017 01:53 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES; 1. City of Meridian 2. Drew Eggers, Owner 3. M3 Companies, LLC, Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this day of A P r i L , 2017, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 and Drew Eggers, whose address is 2256 W. Waggle Place, Meridian, Idaho 83646, hereinafter called OWNER and M3 Companies, LLC, whose address is 1087 W. River Sheet, Suite 310, Boise, Idaho 83702, hereinafter called DEVELOPER, 1. RECITALS; 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-651 IA provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owners and/or Developer make a written commitment concerningthe use or development ofthe subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re -zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner and/or Developer has submitted an application for the re -zoning of approximately 59.94 acres of land from the R-2 (Low Density Residential), R-8 (Medium Density Residential, R-15 (Medium High Density Residential), and CC (Community Business) zoning districts in Ada County to R-4 (Medium Low Density Residential)(44.25 acres) and R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(15.69 acres) zoning districts (as described in Exhibit "A!'), under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner and/or Developer made representations at the public hearings both before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT —`I REE FARM SUBDIVISION (H-2016-0128 PAGE 1 OF 8 before the Meridian City Council, as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for the requested preliminary plat on the Property held before the Planning & Zoning Commission, and subsequently before the City Council, includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 21' day of February, 2017, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit "B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner and/or Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS, the subject property described in Exhibit "A" is bound by a development agreement recorded as instrument #106151218. The subject property shall be removed from that agreement and bound by this new Agreement. 1.10 WHEREAS, Owner and/or Developer deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.11 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner and/or Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on October 11, 2016, Resolution No. 16-1173, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -TREE FARM SUBDIVISION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 2 OF 8 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER: means and refers to Drew Eggers, whose address is 2256 W. Waggle Place, Meridian, Idaho 83646, the party that owns said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s) of the Property. 3.3 DEVELOPER: means and refers to M3 Companies, LLC, whose address is 1087 W. River Street, Suite 310, Boise, Idaho 83702, the party that is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent developer(s) of the Property. 3.4 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit "A" describing the parcels to be re -zoned Medium Low Density Residential (R-4) and Medium Density Residential (R-8) zoning districts and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner and/or Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. The applicant shall construct either N. Tree Farm Way (the off-site section as well as the proposed section included on this plat) or N. Black Cat Road with phase one of the development. b. Future development of this site shall be consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan and building elevations attached in Exhibit A of the staff report that is attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as Exhibit "B". c. The applicant shall comply with the submitted home elevations attached in the staff report that is attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as Exhibit `B". DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -TREE FARM SUBDIVISION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 3 OF 8 The rear and/or side of the structures that face N. Tree Farm Way and N. Black Cate Road shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g. —projections, recesses, step -backs, pop -outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single -story structures are exempt from this requirement. d. The applicant shall obtain alternative compliance approval for the amenities prior to approval of the final plat for the first phase. 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD This Agreement must be fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings for the annexation and zoning or it is null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE -ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default. Either party's failure to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement shall constitute default under this Agreement. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner and/or Developer's default of this Agreement, Owner and/or Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default, which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty (180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner and/or Developer that is not cured after notice as described in Section 7.2, Owners and/or Developer shall be deemed to have consented to modification of this Agreement and de - annexation and reversal of the zoning designations described herein, solely against the offending portion of Property and upon City's compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances and rules, including any applicable provisions of Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511. Owner and/or Developer reserve all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Ada County by either City or Owner and/or Developer, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. 7.4 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner and/or Developer or City is delayed for causes that DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -TREE FARM SUBDIVISION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 4 OF 8 are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.5 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner and/or Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner and/or Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner and/or Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the re -zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner and/or Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner and/or Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner and/or Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - TREE FARM SUBDIVISION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 5 OF 8 CITY: City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Drew Eggers 2256 W. Waggle Place Meridian, ID 83646 with copy to: City Attorney City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 F-PINI•liCI7an M3 Companies, LLC 1087 W. River Street, Suite 310 Boise, ID 83702 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner and/or Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner and/or Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, eachparty shall act reasonably in giving any consent, approval, or taking any other action under this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -TREE FARM SUBDIVISION (H-2016-0128 PAGE 6 OF 8 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third panty (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any, provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner and/or Developer and City relative to the subj ect matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner and/or Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re -zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; signatures, acknowledgements, and Exhibits A and B follow] ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER: DEVELOPER: M3 Companies, LLC Drew Eggers CITY OF Mayorde Weer DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—TREEF)2 SUEDNS[DN(H; By: Printed Name: 6 Its: Qwap r \l 0 City Clerk 28) PAGE 7 OF 8 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: County of Ada, ) On this day of , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Drew Eggers, known or identified to me to be the person who signed above, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written, (SEAL) STATE OF IDAHO ) Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: My Commission Expires: ss: County of Ada, ) On this �O day of 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ] I j i an, I gvvt stN_f ,C- , known or identified tome to be the DGcW/V e e -- of M3 Companies, LLC, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said Corporation, /�V �I�NE�`.WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this 64iflAe,-firstpbovqW.rit n. ,(SEAL) Notary Public f r I aho • {, `X Residing at: �GCt t I l�)? ` My Commission Expires: a a STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this day of 4 , 2017, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles, k ow or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first 0 , (SEAL) rCet Notary Public for aho %n Residing at: , Commission expires: 9 b ®,2690 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -TREE FARM SUBDIVISION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 8 Or, 8 20, COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner and/or Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner and/or Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 21,1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re -zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk, [end of text; signatures, acknowledgements, and Exhibits A and B follow] ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER: DEVELOPER: M3 Companies, LLC Drew Eggers Printed e;__ Its; ATTE CITY OF MERIDIAN By: ° °/ Mayor Tammy de Weerd C, y Col , City Clerk DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — TREE FARM SuBDMsION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 7 OF 8 STATE OF IDAHO ss: County of Ada, On this 16 day of & ri' 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Drew Eggers, known or identified to me to be the person who signed above, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my and and affixed my offic' seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. r (SRTIN McDONALD NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: County of Ada, ) Idaho Residing at: f -3r i - t -'T:Q My Commission Expires: X1-1 ' On this day of , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared , known or identified to me to be the of M3 Companies, LLC, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: My Commission Expires: On this day of 2017, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles, kdow or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. , Notary Public for I aho Residing at: �. Commission expires: - TREE FARM SUBDIVISION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 8 of 8 CJU THE ATCWAY IB1-U-8 COMPANIES onoua°N NAC P N° J -U -B ENGINEERS, INC. iii Tree Farm Subdivision -Medium Density Residential (118) Boundary Description Project Number 10-16-077 November 15, 2016 A parcel of land situated with the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence North 89017'18" West, 2,647.24 feet to a found aluminum cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 22; Thence along the west boundary of said Section 22, North 00930'42" East, 1560.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said west boundary, North 00°30'42" East, 703.26 feet Thence leaving said west boundary, South 89°45'19" East, 295,43 feet; Thence South 32°18'57" East, 126.56 feet; Thence South 0802'28" East, 65.48 feet; Thence South 00°01'52" West, 64.53 feet; Thence South 20°43'04" West, 120.77 feet; Thence South 04040'09" East, 47.03 feet; Thence South 07°37'36" East, 60.91 feet; ANO Gam.. Page 1 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise 10 83709 p 208-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 w www,jub.com (rJ-UjB ,v, J -U•6 ENGINEERS, INC. Thence South 10"33'55" East, 48.10 feet; Thence South 15°58'08" East, 49.53 feet; Thence North 74°01'52" East, 155.05 feet; 1 U I1 COMP. 11IILS I LGATEY ANGOON MAPPING GROUP ti • i INC. Thence 19.86 feet southerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 120.00 feet, a central angle of 09°28'54", and a long chord which bears South 10°41'59" East, 19.84 feet; Thence 344.77 feet southerly along the arc of a reverse curve to the right having a radius of 2,017.00 feet, a central angle of 09°4737", and a long chord which bears South 10032'37" East, 344.35 feet; Thence 45.90 feet southeasterly along the arc of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 45.00 feet, a central angle of 58"26'13", and a long chord which bears South 34051'55" East, 43.93 feet; Thence 115.39 feet easterly along the arc of compound curve to the left having a radius of 473.27 feet, a central angle of 13°58'12", and a long chord which bears South 71°04'08" East, 115.11 feet; Thence South 78°03'14" East, 56.46 feet; Thence South 19°56'46" West, 537.79 feet; Thence 118.25 feet westerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right having a radius point of 800.00 feet, a central angle of 08`28'10", and a long chord which bears North 69°20'25" West, 1.18.15 feet; Thence North 65°0621" West, 221.65 feet; dNA� LA T�q M 0 11779 s Page 2 of 3 - a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 w www.jub.com (rJ-U ��B-h 1•U B COMPANIES o"AaP0N I; M'APTINAG J-U•S ENGINEERS, INC. Thence 163.86 feet northwesterly along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 750.00 feet, a central angle of 12°31'06", and a long chord which bears North 71°21'53" West, 163.54 feet; Thence North 77°37'13" West, 61.49 feet; Thence 4353 feet northerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1,500.00 feet, a central angle of 01039'45", and a long chord which bears North 06°32'40" East, 43.52; Thence 32.56 feet westerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 960.00 feet, a central angle of 1°56'37", and a long chord which bears North 73043'19" West, 3256 feet; Thence 506.64 feet northerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1,468.00 feet, a central angle of 19°46'26", and a long chord which bears North 04°24'25" West, 504.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 683,631 square feet or 15.69 acres, more or less End Description. 10_% I - I J 779 0 Page 3 of 3 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 w www.jub.com I 0 300 600 Scale in Feet Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 19.86' 120.00' 9'28'54° S10'41'59"E 19.84' C2 344.77' 2017.00' 9'47'37" S1932'37"E 344,35' C3 45.90' 45.00' 58'26'13" S34'51'55"E 43.93' C4 115,39' 473.27' 13'58'12" S71'04'08"E 115.11' C5 118.25' 800.00' 8'28'10" N69'20'25"W 118.15' C6 163.86' 750.00' 12'31'06" N71'21'53"W 163.54' C7 32.56' 960.00' 1'56'37" N73'43'19"W 32.56' C8 43.53' 1500.00' 1'39'45" N06'32'40"E 43.52' C9 506.64' 1468.00' 19'46'26" N04'24'25"W 504.13' ('C., Q �- 11779 J' �l ti�r0 0O . Of MD Line Table Line # Direction Length L1 S32'18'57"E 126.56' L2 SOW02'28"E 65.48' L3 SOU01'52"W 64.53' L4 S20 -43'04"W 120.77' L5 SO4'40'09"E 47.03' L6 S07'37'36"E 60.91' L7 S10'33'55"E 48.10' L8 S15'58'08"E 49.53' L9 N74'01'52"E 155.05' L10 S78'03'1 4"E 56.46' 1-11 N77'37'13"W 61.49' OUB I 1-W8 ENGINEERS, INC. Cprai PM�� `S89`45' 19 "E 295.43' - L2 �i L3 0 N L5 �~ L6 �t o L7`_` L9 C1 0 r a z1 1 n ,POB Medium Density Residential R-8 Located In the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of 1 Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, SM, i C3 Cyt I, c`ro t L10 of r u7 C7 uj C8 `a CO to) C� jt/ C S 01 Lot 2, Puma Sub, 21 22 22 2647.24' 2t 27 N, 28 27 W. Chinden Blvd. (U.S. Highway 20/26) Tree Farm Subdivision SHEET Medium Density Residential R-8 Located In the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of 1 Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, SM, ATEAY r r�B)h 1 U ©COMPANIESQRN��paN ;; HAT rw"o J-U•B ENOIN6ERS, INC. Tree Farm Subdivision -Medium -Low Density Residential (114) Boundary Description Project Number 10-16-077 November 2, 2016 A parcel of land situated in the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence North 89°17'18" West, 2,647.24 feet to a found aluminum cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 22; Thence along the west boundary of said Section 22, North 00°30'42" East, 2263.89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said west boundary, North 00030'42" East 348.72 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of the Phyllis Canal as shown on Record of Survey 7900, recorded as Instrument No. 107067669, records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence along said southerly right-of-way line the following nine courses and distances: North 65°15'13" East, 174.26 feet, North 71021'04" East, 300.98 feet; North 74°33'18" East, 164.83 feet; North 75°4929" East, 79.69 feet; North 81°10'02" East, 156.99 feet; �6AIp VtA 11779 Page 3 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise 10 83709 p 208-376-7330 f 208.323.9336 w www.jub.corn (eJ• r B,'k J•U•R ENGINEERS, INC. North 80°3632" East, 317.18 feet; North 79°11'07" East, 128.36 feet; North 79°30'38" East, 40,23 feet; THEj GATEWAY J U• B COMPANIES4 I CROUP N I MACPPINO North 76033121" East, 13.91 feet to the east boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence South 00030'32" West, 338.90 feet to the northeast corner of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence along the east boundary of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22, South 00°30'49" West, 1851.43 feet; Thence 458.56 feet westerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right having a radius of 906.04 feet, a central angle of 28059'53", and a long chord which bears South 87"2649" West, 453.68 feet; Thence North 78°03'14" West, 215.76 feet; Thence 62.54 feet westerly along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 800.00 feet, a central angle of 04°2844'; and a long chord which bears North 75948'52" West, 62.52 feet; Thence North 19°56'46" East, 537.79 feet; Thence North 78003'14" West, 56.46 feet; Thence 115.39 feet westerly along the arc of curve to the right having a radius of 473.27 feet, a central angle of 13058'12'; and a long chord which bears North 71"04'08" West, 115.11 feet; Thence 45.90 feet northwesterly along the arc of a compound curve to the right having a radius of 45.00 feet, a central angle of 58°26'13", and a long chord which bears North 34°51'55" West, 43.93 feet; Ak.LAAYQ 11779 1_1 l Ito '� 04 0VF �M, 1ecCA Page 2 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 , j' 208-37.3-9336 tiv wwwjub.com CJ« « J -U B COMPANIES 'LA6. b1APP NO CROUP I INC. J-U•B ENGINEERS, INC. Thence 344.77 feet northerly along the arc a reverse curve to the left having a radius of 2,017.00 feet, a central angle of 09°47'37"; and a long chord which bears North 10°32'37" West, 344.35 feet; Thence 19.86 feet northerly along the arc of a reverse curve to the right having a radius of 120.00 feet, a central angle of 09°28'54", and a long chord which bears North 10°41'59" West, 19.84 feet; Thence South 74°01'52" West, 155.05 feet; Thence North 15058'08" West, 49.53 feet; Thence North 10"33'55" West, 48.10 feet; Thence North 07°37'36" West, 60.91 feet; Thence North 04040'09" West, 47.03 feet; Thence North 20043'04" East, 120.77 feet; Thence North 00°01'52" East, 64.53 feet; Thence North 08°02'28" West, 65.48 feet; Thence North 32°18'57" West, 126.56 feet; Thence North 89045'19" West, 295.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 1,927,625 square feet or 44.25 acres, more or less. End Description. rt', 11779 11 Page 3 of 3 u 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 i 208-323-9336 w www.jub.com W N 0 400 800 ro a c6' O M Z Scale in Feet Line Table Line # Direction Length Ll N65'1 5' 1 YE 174.26' L2 N743,3'1 8"E 164,83' L3 N75'49'29"E 79.69' L4 N81' 10'02"E 156.99' L5 N79' 11'07"E 128.36' L6 N79'30'38"E 40.23' L7 N76'33'21 "E 13.91' L8 N78'03' 14"W 215.75' L9 N78'03'1 4"W 56.46' L10 S74'01'52"W 155.05' Ll1 N15'58'08"W 49,53' L12 N 10'33'55"W 48.10' L13 N07'37'36"W 60.91' L14 N04'40'09"W 47.03' L15 N20'43'04 "E 120.77' L15 N00'01'52"E 64.53' L17 N08'02'28"W 65,48' L18 N32'1 8'57"W 126.56' L19 N89'45'19"W 295.43' `17 79 e OF r:� phi\\\ `2,� L7 W. Chinden Blvd. (U.S. Highway 20/26) N89'17'18"W 2647.24' 22 27 Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 458.56' 906.04' 28'59'53" S87'26'49"W 453.68' C2 62.54' 800.00' 4'28'44"� N75'48'52"W 62.52' C3 115.39' 473.27' 13'58'12" N71'04'08"W 115.11' C4 45.90' 45.00' 58'26' 13" N34'51'55"W 43.93' C5 344.77' 2017,00' 9'47'37" N10'32'37"W 344.35' C6 19.86' 120.00' 9.28'54" N10'41'59'W 19.84' � 744Fn°^ - fa. mon �.-- Tree Farm Subdivision SHEET In©EoelPlseNr,rrronu: 1 Y+v-"TouFtiui3ICOPPOMIMmool , riwi�.laleoa AAANOi41NIN1@IIUFYR01"ESSIOtUi 4CAV10E.8IIIF.PROYEAtY OP , Medium -Low Densi Residential R-4 J•VAWU THEFtPROJE T E4NUTIq UE U9EE"r. VIR tE0i1F'r911, UMYR: BY CAVI [nR ANY UFNCR PROJECT YATNUU1111:C%YItF.S3 YiNIf1 EN OEfJWj0Y.CItN AUfNUR7n1�ON OF JA,4 ENOINEERikt �1��REEnY Located In the W 112 of the SW 1/4 and the SW 1/4 of the NW 114 j r 1•UD ENGINEERS, INC. of Section 22, Township4 North, Range 1 West, B,M. l.Y1 IU,KftIYl OF:Sr:R4rl1lYl IIY II {MIF. IAnTUPUATEn 11/!17914 S J -U-13 COMPANIESOR OAYICWAY CJy H P H6 OP IHC.� J•U•e ENGINEERS, INC. Tree Farm Subdivision -Medium Density Residential (RS) Boundary Description Project: Number 10-16-077 November 15, 2016 A parcel of land situated with the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence North 89'17'18" West, 2,647.24 feet to a found aluminum cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 22; Thence along the west boundary of said Section 22, North 00°30'42" East, 1560.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said west boundary, North 00°30'42" East, 703.26 feet Thence leaving said west boundary, South 89°45'19" East, 295.43 feet; Thence South 32°18'57" East, 126.56 feet; Thence South 0802'28" East, 65.48 feet; Thence South 00°01.'52" West, 64.53 feet; Thence South 20'43'04" West, 120.77 feet; Thence South 04'40'09" East, 47.03 feet; Thence South 07037'36" East, 60.91 feet; �?Np 11779 S Page 1 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 w www.jub.com CJCJ-:B',% ,00 J•U•B ENGINEERS, INC, Thence South 3.0'33'55" East, 48.10 feet; Thence South 15°58'08" East, 4953 feet; Thence North 74°01'52" East, 155.05 feet; THE ATZWAY I IJ I: Lilil,j RAMIcS 1 LANGOON WAPP NO gg I GROUP INC, Thence 19.86 feet southerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 120.00 feet, a central angle of 09°28'54", and a long chord which bears South 10'41'59" East, 19.84 feet; Thence 344.77 feet southerly along the arc of a reverse curve to the right having a radius of 2,017.00 feet, a central angle of 09°47'37", and a long chord which bears South 10032'37" East, 344.35 feet; Thence 45.90 feet southeasterly alongthe arc of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 45.00 feet, a central angle of 58"26'13", and a long chord which bears South 34051'55" East, 43.93 feet; Thence 115.39 feet easterly along the arc of compound curve to the left having a radius of 473.27 feet, a central angle of 13"58'12", and a long chord which bears South 71a04'08" East, 115.11 feet; Thence South 78°03'14" East, 56.46 feet; Thence South 19°56'46" West, 537.79 feet; Thence 118.25 feet westerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right having a radius point of 800.00 feet, a central angle of 08`28'10", and a long chord which bears North 69°20'25" West, 118.15 feet; Thence North 65°06`21" West, 221.65 feet; pNP�- LA �tSTER SG � r 11779 Page 2 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, 1D 83709 p 208-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 w wwsu.jub.com (-J-UIBTHr WAY d•U 3 COMPANIES ; LAN. -ON "APPIINO Ono. INC. J•U•8 ENGINEERS, INC. Thence 163.85 feet northwesterly along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 750.00 feet, a central angle of 12'31'06", and a long chord which bears North 71°21'5311 West, 163.54 feet; Thence North 77°37'13" West, 61.49 feet; Thence 43.53 feet northerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1,500.00 feet, a central angle of 01°39'45", and a long chord which bears North 06°32'40" East, 43.52; Thence 32.56 feet westerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 960,00 feet, a central angle of 1°56'37", and a long chord which bears North 73043'19" West, 32.56 feet; Thence 506.64 feet northerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1,468.00 feet, a central angle of 19'46'26", and a long chord which bears North 04°24'25" West, 504.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 683,631 square feet or 15.69 acres, more or less End Description. 1 �9 0 OF Iwo � Page 3 of 3 u 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, IB 83709 p 208-376-7330 ( 208-323-9336 w www.jub.co Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 19.86' 120.00' 9'28'54" S10*41'59"E 19.84' C2 344.771 2017.00' 9'47'37" S1932'37"E 344.35' C3 45.90' 45.00' 58'26'13" S34'51'55"E 43.93' C4 115.39' 473.27' 13'58'12" 571'04'08"E 115.11' C5 118.25' 800.00' 8'28'10 N69'20'25"W 118.15' C6 163.86' 750.00' 12'31'06" N71'21'53"W 163.54' C7 32.56' 960.00' 1'56'37" N73'43'19"W 32.56' C8 43.53' 1500.00' 1'39'45" N06'32'40"E 43.52' C9 506.64' 1468.00' 19'46'2611 N0424'25"W 504.13' 11779 �p 4TF OF i tteude nFnn.wxra R TH49 Hn(:t1YCH1. AN6IIiC II:CA9 Nk00C51GN:1 WlAA'UHA[CtI IIf ICV1 M1,S AN IN91[LlF1A F.NI UFI.Rdef 59:ONPLLiFFLNf.F..CS1NF.l•0.CY'F.R I."F J -V ®ENGEH[fiR9, Inc A`ili f:i N"l Iti I C L11C M IMII lH NAR1. ' F0.Z NIYUINER s'RCiJ{UT wi[I17"1 InC EXNHES55'hV1iCN AIAII%1HVAiUN OF}dl•0 Ex41HEfR{Me Line Table Line # Direction Length L1 S32'18'57"E 126.56' L2 S013'02'28"E 65.48' L3 S00'01'52"W 64.53' L4 S20"43'04"W 120.77' L5 504'40'09"E 47,03' L6 S07'37'36"E 60,91' L7 S10'33'55"E 48.10' L8 S15'58'08"E 49.53' L9 N74'01'52"E 155.05' L10 578'03' 14"E 56.46' j L11 N77'37'1YIN 61.49' Go�a� I S89"45'1 9 " E f 295.43' L2 N �j L3 0 r` �r- N L5 --� L6 L7 C1 0 r C7 � z �- - i roe rarm aumvision SHEET ("JUBI Medium Density Resideniiai R -B Located in the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of 1 1-U-8 ENGINEERS, INC. Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, B.M, 4 C3 C -t I LIO of C7 w I C8 l L11 n� � O � f � a3 � I t� C�� ` Ui ro CS Lot 2, Puma Sub. 21 22 2647.24' 22 28 27 N89'17'18"w 27 W. Chinden Blvd. (U.S. Highway 20/26) �- - i roe rarm aumvision SHEET ("JUBI Medium Density Resideniiai R -B Located in the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of 1 1-U-8 ENGINEERS, INC. Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, B.M, CJ-U- :B 1 U 6 COMPANIES I LA"GZIQN 4ATEWAY I MAPPINO *Raul IHC. J -U -B ENGINEERS, INC. Tree Farm Subdivision -Medium -Low Density Residential (114) Boundary Description Project Number 10-16-077 November 2, 2016 A parcel of land situated in the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22,- Thence 2; Thence North 89617'18" West, 2,647.24 feet to a found aluminum cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 22; Thence along the west boundary of said Section 22, North 00°30'42" l=ast, 2263.89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said west boundary, North 0030'42" East 348.72 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of the Phyllis Canal as shown on Record of Survey 7900, recorded as Instrument No. 107067669, records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence along said southerly right-of-way line the following nine courses and distances: North 65°15'13" East, 174.26 feet; North 71"21'04" East, 300.98 feet; North 74"33'18" East, 164.83 feet; North 75049'29" East, 79.69 feet; North 81°10'02" East, 156,99 feet; Page 1 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Seechwood Avenue Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 f 208.323-9336 iv www: ub.cnm J•U•B ENGINEERS, INC. North 80°36'32" East, 317.18 feet; North 79011'07° East, 128.36 feet; North 7930'38" East, 40.23 feet; 1 U -B COMPANIES � ( LAN ON El I MAPPING GROUP INC, North 76033'21" East, 13.91 feet to the east boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence South 00*30'32" West, 338.90 feet to the northeast corner of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence along the east boundary of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22, South 00030'49" West, 1851.43 feet; Thence 458.56 feet westerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right having a radius of 906.04 feet, a central angle of 28°59'53", and a long chord which bears South 87°26'49" West, 453.68 feet; Thence North 78003'14" West, 215.76 feet; Thence 62.54 feet westerly along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 800,00 feet, a central angle of 04°28'44'; and a long chord which bears North 75°48'52" West, 62.52 feet; Thence North 19056'46" East, 537.79 feet; Thence North 78'03'14" West, 56.46 feet; Thence 115.39 feet westerly along the arc of curve to the right having a radius of 473.27 feet, a central angle of 13°58'12"; and a long chord which bears North 71°04'08" West, 115.11 feet; Thence 45.90 feet northwesterly along the arc of a compound curve to the right having a radius of 45.00 feet, a central angle of 58026'13", and a long chord which bears North 34°51'55" West, 43.93 feet; J�I vf.. X74 11779 j(h t rt Page 2 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 248-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 ry www,:u b.com (rJ-UIB'h THE 1-U 3 COMPAMES =* I LANGDON OROUP GATMAY MAPPING ItEC. J•U•B ENGINEERS, INC. Thence 344.77 feet northerly along the arc a reverse curve to the left having a radius of 2,01.7.00 feet, a central angle of 09°47'37"; and a long chord which hears North 10°32'37" West, 344.35 feet; Thence 19.86 feet northerly along the arc of a reverse curve to the right having a radius of 120.00 feet, a central angle of 09°28'54", and a long chord which bears North 10041'59" West, 19,84 feet; Thence South 74°07.'52" West, 1.55.05 feet; Thence North 15058'08" West, 49.53 feet; Thence North 1033'55" West, 48.10 feet; Thence North 07037'36" West, 60.91 feet; Thence North 04040'09" West, 47,03 feet; Thence North 20043'04" East, 120.77 feet; Thence North 00'01'52" East, 64.53 feet; Thence North 08"02'28" West, 65.48 feet; Thence North 32'18'57" West, 126,56 feet; Thence North 89'45'19" West, 295.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 1,927,625 square feet or 44.25 acres, more or less. End Description. �p,L LAS s 11779 d, /711 LP - 4 OF Page 3 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 208-376-7330__f 208-323-9336 w www.jub.com w /¢ N 0 400 800 o6 Ca r 3 0 Scale in Feet Line Table Line # Direction Length L1 N65'15'13 "E 174.26' L2 N74'33'18"E 164.83' L3 N75'49'29"E 79.69' L4 N81'10'02"E 156.99' L5 N79'1 1'07"E 128.36' L6 N79'30'38"E 40.23' L7 N76'33'21 "E 13.91' L8 N78'03'1 4"W 215.76' L9 N78'03'1 4"W 56.46' L10 S74'01'52"W 155.05' L11 N15'58'08"W 49.53' L12 N 1 0'33 `55"W 48.10' L13 N07'37'36"W 60.91' L14 N04'40'09"W 47,03' L15 N20'43'04"E 120.77' L16 N00'01'52"E 64.53' L17 N08'02'28"W 65.48' L18 N32'18'57"W 126.56' 1-19 N89'45'19"W 295.43' S TU '[ 779 �O F tE%: 2 22 28"27 Carol Phyllis �3 L4 L6 - t_.5 .7 N O rY7 Cn oc6 0 r7 0 W. Chinden Blvd. (U.S. Highway 20/26) N89'17'18"W 2647.24' 22 27 Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 458.56' 906.04' 28'59'53" S87'26'49"W 453.68' C2 62.54' 800.00' 4'28'44" N75'48'52'1W 62.52' C3 115.39' 473.27' 13'58'12" N71'04'08"W 115.11' C4 45.90' 45.00' 58'26' 13" N34'51'55"W 43.93' C5 344.77' 2017.00' 9'47'37" N10'32'37"W 344.35' C6 19.86` 120.00' 9'28'54" N1 0'41'59"W 19.84' Rey sQF�R��xR, rlLr:,,ur ,4l"V x,_L Tree Farm Subdivision II,c noeulnr>rr. xen rru_7�cns Hw ueeuuos NCmle�nrulr� i¢nev4 SKEET '+ Al AU 1.`STIU1MCN, Of RRnrr5510NAi 3CRNCE,M TRP PRCKATY Of aA i'n6J 1. m.lnorl ■ _ rOn Ab nUVnrEnRPROJECTw13a1x, UnT"rq Ul LSkq, INN9rbe"�QIIF'nNl', "iUVJx BY CMAI ��.��.Medium-Low N ensi Residential R-4 orr,reerRr.exu, J °'• nuruURIJ�,IVNOF J•v.p FxUlx6¢Ra.l�� 1 :W,:xF*W CA Located in the W 112 of the SW 114 and the SW 114 of the NW 114 1-!1.6 ENGINEERS, INC. of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, B•M, l.Yl fiC V,ii:[kl❑{Sf RIIriYYJ !IY II ,7AfF In .r UPLATCn'„fl1Mt8 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). H-2016-0128 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request to rezone a portion of property from R-2 (10.17 acres) to R-4, to rezone a portion of property from R-8 (33.84 acres) to R-4, to rezone a portion of property from R- 15 (.25 acres) to R-4, to rezone a portion of property from C-C (.27 acres) to R-8, to rezone a portion of property from R-15 (154 s.f.) to R-8, and for a preliminary plat consisting of 161 single- family residential lots and 15 common lots on 61.64 acres of land, located at 4740 W. Chinden Blvd, by M3 Companies, LLC. Case No(s). H-2016-0128 For the City Council Hearing Date of: February 7, 2017 (Findings on February 21, 2017) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 7, 2017, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 7, 2017, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 7, 2017, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 7, 2017, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). H-2016-0128 2 - 6. That the City has granted an order of approval of the annexation and preliminary plat request in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning Division, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached staff report for the hearing date of February 7, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for Rezone and Preliminary Plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the attached staff report for the hearing date of February 7, 2017, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Six (6) Month Development Agreement Duration The development agreement shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the City within six (6) months of the City Council granting annexation and/or rezone (UDC 11-5B-3D). A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). H-2016-0128 3 - to be signed and returned to the City if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval period (UDC 11-5B-3F). E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of February 7, 2017 Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: February 7, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Josh Beach, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2016-0128 – Tree Farm Subdivision I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant, M3 Companies, LLC, has submitted a request for the following: Rezone a portion of property from R-2 (10.17 acres) to R-4 Rezone a portion of property from R-8 (33.84 acres) to R-4 Rezone a portion of property from R-15 (.25 acres) to R-4 Rezone a portion of property from C-C (.27 acres) to R-8 Rezone a portion of property from R-15 (154 s.f.) to R-8 A remainder of the property approximately 15.42 acres will remain as R-8 The applicant is also requesting a preliminary plat consisting of one hundred sixty one (161) single- family residential lots and fifteen (15) common lots on 61.64 acres of land. II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed applications with the conditions listed in Exhibit B, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit D. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on January 5, 2017. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject RZ, and PP requests. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Mark Tate, Drew Eggers, Tuck Ewing, Sam Johnson ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Drew Eggers, Tuck Ewing, Sam Johnson, iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Josh Beach, Bill Parsons, vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. How utilities will be extended to and through this property and extended to the north. ii. Coordinating the construction of Black Cat on the west property line and determining where the road crosses the Phyllis Canal. c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Whether the proposed amenities are sufficient for the development. ii. The applicant will need to go through the alternative compliance process in order to request a change in the amenity requirement. iii. The extension of utilities to the north of this property and the timing of doing so. Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 iv. Should this project be moved forward to City Council without comments from ACHD on Tree Farm Way and Black Cat? d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Add condition 1.1.1d to read as follows: “The applicant shall obtain alternative compliance approval for the amenities prior to approval of the final plat for the first phase.” e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. None The Meridian City Council heard these items on February 7, 2017. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject RZ and PP request. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Mark Tate ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Drew Eggers, Tuck Ewing iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Josh Beach vi. Other staff commenting on application: Clint Dolsby, Warren Stewart, Caleb Hood b. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. The size of the force main that is in Basco Lane. ii. The potential to allow the applicant to receive building permits prior to utilities being in place and a signature on a final plat. c. Key Council Changes to Staff/Commission Recommendation i. None III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend approval of File Number H-2016-0128 as presented in staff report for the hearing date of January 5, 2017 with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial of File Number H-2016-0128 as presented in staff report for the hearing date of January 5, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reason(s) for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2016-0128 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The site is located at 4740 W. Chinden Blvd., in the SW ¼ of Section 22, Township 4N., Range 1W. B. Owners: Drew Eggers 2256 N. Waggle Place Meridian, ID 83646 C. Applicant: M3 Companies, LLC, (Mark Tate) Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 1087 W. River Street, Suite 310 Boise, ID 83702 E. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information. V. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject application is for a rezone and a preliminary plat. A public hearing is required before the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on this matter, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5. B. Newspaper notifications published on: December 19 and January 2, 2016 (Commission); January 20, 2017 (Council) C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: December 8, 2016 (Commission); January 13, 2017 (Council) D. Applicant posted notice on site(s) on: December 26, 2016 (Commission); January 30, 2017 Council) VI. LAND USE A. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning: The land is undeveloped and the recent use has been agricultural. The property does not have any structures or appear to have had any improvements. B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: 1. North: Phyllis Canal; Rural residential; Agricultural, zoned RUT (Ada County) 2. East: Single-family residential property in the Oak Leak and Spurwing Grove Subdivisions, zoned R-2 and R-8 respectively 3. South: Jayker Nursery, zoned C-C and R-15 4. West: Agricultural and residential, zoned R-8 C. History of Previous Actions: In 2006, the subject property was annexed as the Tree Farm (AZ-06-004 and AZ-06-050) and was granted approval with R-2, R-8, R-15, C-N and C-C zoning districts. A Development Agreement (DA) (#106151218) was executed upon annexation of the property. Several addendums to the DA have also been recorded (#107025555 and #107141993). In 2007, a third addendum to the DA was approved and recorded (#107141993) that realigned the zoning district boundaries consistent with the approved preliminary plat. In 2010, a development agreement modification (MDA-10-004) was approved that approved building elevations and a new concept plan that included a tennis facility as an amenity within a common lot contingent on the platting of the property. D. Utilities: 1. Public Works: Location of sewer: The sanitary sewer main intended to provide service to this development exists in S. Eagle Road. Location of water: Domestic water service to this development will be provided by Suez Water Idaho, formerly United Water of Idaho. Issues or concerns: None Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 E. Physical Features: 1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: An irrigation ditch runs along the south and western property lines, which is managed by the Settlers Irrigation District. The ditch will be tiled, except for an open pond amenity. 2. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards that exist on the property. 3. Flood Plain: There are no designated flood plains on the subject property. 4. Topography: This site is generally flat, except along the rim. VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS This property is designated “Medium Density Residential” and “Low Density Residential” on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. Medium density residential areas are anticipated to contain between three and eight dwellings per acre (see Page 20 of the Comprehensive Plan.). Low density residential areas are anticipated to contain up to three dwellings per acre (see Page 20 of the Comprehensive Plan.) The proposed preliminary plat includes 161 single-family lots on 61.64 acres for a total gross density of 2.61 dwelling units/acre. Even though the 2.61 dwelling units per acre is below the Comprehensive Plan designation for the Medium Density Residential” portion, it is important to note that when this property was annexed, a specific concept plan for this entire Tree Farm area was approved by the City Council. The proposed preliminary plat is generally consistent with that concept plan for this portion of the overall annexation area. Thus, staff is of the opinion that the application is compliant with the recommended density for this area as shown on the conceptual plan. Furthermore, a step down in density is allowed by the Future Land Use Map as long as the change is within one “step” of the map designation (Low to Medium in this instance). The R-8 portion of the project is 15.42 acres of land on the west side of the parcel. This portion consists of 55 single-family homes. The approximate gross density for the R-8 portion of the project is 3.56 dwelling units per acre, which is well under the allowed density for the R -8 zoning district. The gross density for the R-4 portion of the project (which consists of 106 dwelling units on 46.22 acres) is 2.29 dwelling units per acre, which is well under the maximum density allowed for the R-4 zoning district. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed development (staff analysis in italics below policy): Require street connections between subdivisions at regular intervals to enhance connectivity and better traffic flow.” (3.03.03C) The applicant’s proposed street lay-out is generally consistent with The Tree Farm Annexation. The street network proposed on the plat only allows for one public street connection for the entire development (W. Snow Cherry Street).W. Snow Cherry Lane alone is not adequate to provide access to this development. Due to the lack of connectivity, staff recommends that either the off- site section of N. Tree Farm Way or N. Black Cat Road be constructed with the first phase of development. Either of these connections will provide adequate connectivity for the proposed homes. In addition, the applicant will be required to provide stub streets to adjoining properties for future connectivity (one to the south and one to the west). Staff is generally supportive of the proposed street design and connections within this subdivision. Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system.” (3.03.03B) The applicant is proposing to construct 5-foot detached sidewalks along all of the proposed local Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 streets in the subdivision. N. Tree Farm Way, a collector street, will have a 5-foot sidewalk constructed on both sides. In addition, several micro-paths are proposed, to provide additional pedestrian connectivity to the surrounding area. The proposed sidewalks and pathways will enhance pedestrian connectivity in this area. Require common area for all subdivisions.” (3.07.02F) The applicant has provided 6.17 acres (10%) of open space which meets the ten percent requirement of open space set forth in the UDC. Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels.” (3.06.01F) The proposed rezone is consistent with the approved concept plan for The Tree Farm Annexation AZ-06-004).The concept plan for the site encourages a range and mix of housing densities. This was taken under consideration with the annexation of the property. The zoning in place for the proposed subdivision is R-2 (low-density residential, and R-8 (medium density residential). The applicant is proposing to rezone the R-2 portion of the property (that is currently located in the north east corner of the property) to R-4, which with the request to step up density, is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The request to rezone portion of the existing R-8 portion of the property to R-4 is also consistent with the comprehensive plan and the step down in density is allowed per the comprehensive plan. Staff finds the proposed plat is compatible with existing and planned residential development in the surrounding area. Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage / backage roads.” (3.03.02N) The applicant has worked with the adjacent property owners and they have entered into an agreement to dedicate the Right-of-way required to construct N. Black Cat Road. Protect and conserve existing waterways, groundwater, wetlands, wildlife habitat, air, soils, and other natural resources.” (5.01.01) Staff has concerns with the topography of the property as the future N. Black Cat Road crosses over the Phyllis Canal. The applicant will need to address this topography on their plat. This includes a requirement that a common lot be provided in the northwest corner of the plat adjacent to lots 46 and 47, Block 6. Review new development for appropriate opportunities to connect local roads and collectors to adjacent properties (stub streets).” (3.03.02O) The applicant will be required to provide a stub street to the south and to the west for future connectivity. After considering all of these factors staff believes that the proposed development is generally consistent with comprehensive plan. Based on the above analysis, staff finds that the proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommends approval. VIII. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) A. Purpose Statement of the Residential Districts (R-4 and R-8): The purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of dwelling units per acre and corresponding housing types that can be accommodated within the density Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 range. B. Schedule of Use Control: Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-2A-2 lists single family detached housing as principally permitted uses in the R-4 and R-8 zoning districts. C. Dimensional Standards: Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC 11-2A-5 for the R-4 zoning district and 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district. D. Landscaping: A 20-foot wide buffer is required to be constructed along N. Tree Farm Way and N. Black Cat Road in accord with the street buffer landscaping standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. E. Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards: The subdivision must comply with the subdivision design standards outlined in UDC 11-6C-3. F. Off-Street Parking: Off-street parking is required in accord with UDC Table 11-3C-6. IX. ANALYSIS 1. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: Rezone (RZ): The subject property is governed by a development agreement (DA) recorded as instrument #106151218. As mentioned earlier, the proposed rezone is generally consistent with the concept plan that was approved with The Tree Farm Annexation, and is generally consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Development Agreement (DA): As part of this application, staff is requiring that the applicant enter into a new development agreement for the property and be required to construct one of two off-site street improvements. These being either N. Tree Farm way to connect to the existing N. Tree Farm Way that is stubbed to the east of this property, or construction of N. Black Cat Road. Preliminary Plat: The proposed plat consists of one hundred sixty-one (161) building lots and fifteen (15) common lots on 61.64 acres of land. The R-4 and R-8 zoning districts are appropriate for the proposed development. The gross density for the subdivision is 2.61 d.u./acre. The R-8 portion of the project is 15.42 acres of land on the west side of the parcel. This portion consists of 55 single-family homes. The approximate gross density for the R-8 portion of the project is 3.56 dwelling units per acre, which is well under the allowed density for the R-8 zoning district. The gross density for the R-4 portion of the project (which consists of 106 dwelling units on 46.22 acres) is 2.29 dwelling units per acre, which is well under the maximum density allowed for the R-4 zoning district. The applicant will be required to make several modifications to the plat in order to meet UDC requirements. These changes include the following: Add a twenty (20) foot common lot adjacent to the western boundary of lots in the northwest corner of the plat (Lots 47 and 48, Block 6). Stub a street to parcels R7219170210 and S0421449000. Prior to Planning and Zoning Commission, provide a phasing plan. Dimensional Standards: Development of this site is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC 11-2A-5 for the R-4 district and Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 district. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and found it to be in compliance with the R-4 and R-8 dimensional standards. Block Length: The plat is required to comply with the block length standards listed in UDC 11- 6C-3F. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and found it to be in compliance with the aforementioned standards. Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 Common Drives: There are three common driveways proposed. The applicant is proposing Lots 22-24 of Block 1, to take access from a common driveway, Lots 64, 65 and 67-69, Block 6 to take access from a common driveway, and lots 8, 9 and 26-28, Block 6 from a common driveway. Per UDC-11-6C-3D, common driveways shall serve a maximum of (6) dwelling unit. For any plats using a common driveway, the setbacks, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures shall be shown on the preliminary plat and/or as an exhibit with the final plat application. The applicant shall provide the required exhibits with the submittal of a final plat application. One of the common driveways (Lot 10, Block 6) will be used as an emergency access and will have bollards to limit vehicular access to emergency personnel and will have no parking signs. Access: Access to this development will be provided from W. Snow Cherry Street, N. Tree Farm Way, (a portion of which has been constructed with Spurwing Greens Subdivision) and the future construction of N. Black Cat Road. The applicant has discussed the extension of N. Black Cat Road and N. Tree Farm Way with the adjacent property owner and with representatives of ACHD. Staff has not yet received a staff report from ACHD. There is a scheduled ACHD hearing for this project that is scheduled for January 25th, 2016. City staff anticipates a staff report from ACHD prior to that hearing. Without the requirements of ACHD, staff feels that in order to provide adequate access to the development, that the applicant be required to either construct the remaining portion of N. Tree Farm way (a portion of which is located off-site) or N. Black Cat Road with the first phase of development in order to provide access to the proposed subdivision. Sidewalks: Sidewalks are required along all public streets as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. Landscaping, Open Space and Amenities: The applicant is proposing 6.17 acres (10%) of open space for the development. The applicant is also proposing to include one amenity (plaza). Based on the acreage of the plat, the applicant is required to provide two (2) additional amenities that meet the requirements of UDC 11-3G and that details of this amenity are provided at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. The landscape plan also depicts a 20 foot landscape buffer along N. Tree Farm Way and N. Black Cat Road with the exception of the northwest corner. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide the common lot and required landscape buffer in that area in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C. Existing Trees: The applicant is responsible to mitigate all existing healthy trees 4-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of 100% replacement in accord with UDC 11-3B-10. The applicant will need to contact the City Arborist if any trees are to be removed. Fencing: The developer is responsible for constructing fences abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas; fencing details should be included with the final plat application in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7. Any future fencing proposed for the development must comply with the fencing regulations set forth in UDC 11-3A-7. Pressurized Irrigation (PI): The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation (PI) systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. The applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. An Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 underground, pressurized irrigation system is required to be installed in accordance with UDC 11- 3A-15. Building Elevations: The submitted elevations depict a mix of building materials, decorative window and door trim, decorative corbels, covered entries, and stone wainscot consistent with the surrounding developments. Staff is of the opinion the future single-family homes will complement the existing homes in the area and demonstrate high quality materials (see Exhibit A.4). The rear and/or side of structures that face N. Tree Farm Way and N. Black Cat Road shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g. – projections, recesses, step-backs, pop-outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. In accord with the Findings contained in Exhibit D, Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat request for this site. Staff has included comments and recommended conditions from other City departments in Exhibit B of this report. X. EXHIBITS A. Drawings/Other 1. Vicinity Map 2. Proposed Preliminary Plat (dated: 12/19/16) 3. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 10/28/16) 4. Conceptual Building Elevations B. Agency & Department Comments/Conditions C. Required Findings from Unified Development Code Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 A. Drawings 1. Vicinity Map Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 2. Proposed Preliminary Plat (dated: 12/19/16) Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 3. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 10/28/2016) Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 4. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 B. EXHIBIT B - AGENCY & DEPARTMENT COMMENTS/CONDITIONS 1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1.1 A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to the annexation ordinance approval and the acceptance of a final plat application, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the City within six months of the City Council granting annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. The applicant shall construct either N. Tree Farm Way (the off-site section as well as the proposed section included on this plat) or N. Black Cat Road with phase one of the development. b. Future development of this site shall be consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan and building elevations attached in Exhibit A and the revisions noted in the staff report. c. The applicant shall comply with the submitted home elevations attached in Exhibit A.4. The rear and/or side of structures that face N. Tree Farm Way and N. Black Cat Road shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g. – projections, recesses, step-backs, pop-outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. d. The applicant shall obtain alternative compliance approval for the amenities prior to approval of the final plat for the first phase. 1.1.2 The preliminary plat, dated 12/19/16, is approved with the following changes: a. The applicant shall provide two (2) stub streets, one (1) to parcel #R7219170210 from N. Tree Farm Way and one (1) to parcel # S0421449000 from N. Black Cat Road. b. The applicant shall provide a twenty (20) foot common lot adjacent to the western boundary of Lots 47 and 48 of Block 6. This lot shall be vegetated in accord with UDC 11-3B-7. c. Bollards and no parking signs shall be installed on common driveway Lot 10, Block 6 which will serve as an emergency access. d. Prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, the applicant shall provide a phasing plan. 1.1.3 The landscape plan included in Exhibit A.3, dated 10/28/16, is approved with the following changes: a. Prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant shall provide detail for all proposed amenities as well as for two (2) additional amenities that meet the requirements of UDC 11-3G. b. Fencing adjacent to all pathways and common open space shall meet the requirements of UDC 11-3A-7. Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 1.1.4 An exhibit depicting the setbacks, building envelope and orientation of lots and structures shall be submitted with the final plat application. Include note on the final plat that addresses access across the lots and the responsible party for maintenance of the common driveways. 1.1.5 Prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant shall provide a phasing plan for the development. 1.1.6 Because homes on lots that back-up to public streets such as N. Tree Farm Way and N. Black Cat Road (Lots 2-8, Block 1, Lots 2-7 and 8-17, Block 2, Lots 68-77, Block 6, and Lots 47 and 48, Block 7) will be highly visible; the side of any structure that faces the public street on these lots shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials, color, modulation, and architectural elements (horizontal and vertical) to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. 1.2 General Conditions of Approval 1.2.1 Comply with all bulk, use, and development standards of the R-4 and R-8 zoning districts listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-5 and 11-2A-6. 1.2.2 Comply with all provisions of 11-3A-3 with regard to access to streets. 1.2.3 Comply with the provisions for irrigation ditches, laterals, canals and/or drainage courses, as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. 1.2.4 Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 15, UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. The applicant shall provide a waiver from the applicable irrigation district that the property does not have water rights and/or water delivery to the subject property with the submittal of a final plat application. 1.2.5 Install all utilities consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-21 and 11-3B-5J. 1.2.6 Construct all off-street parking areas consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings. 1.2.7 Construct the required landscape buffers consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 7C. 1.2.8 Comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to cul-de-sacs, common driveways, easements, blocks, street buffers, and mailbox placement. 1.2.9 Protect any existing trees on the subject property that are greater than four-inch caliper and/or mitigate for the loss of such trees as set forth in UDC 11-3B-10. 1.2.10 Comply with all provisions of UDC 11-3A-3 with regard to maintaining the clear vision triangle. 1.3 Ongoing Conditions of Approval 1.3.1 The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 1.3.2 All common open space and site amenities shall be maintained by an owner's association as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3F1. 1.3.3 The project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances and previous conditions of approval associated with this site. 1.3.4 The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 1.3.5 The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 1.3.6 The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11- 3A-3. 1.4 Process Conditions of Approval 1.4.1 No signs are approved with this application. Prior to installing any signs on the property, the applicant shall submit a sign permit application consistent with the standards in UDC Chapter 3 Article D and receive approval for such signs. 1.4.2 The applicant shall complete all improvements related to public life, safety, and health as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. A surety agreement may be accepted for other improvements in accord with UDC 11-5C-3C. 1.4.3 The final plat, and any phase thereof, shall substantially comply with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C2. 1.4.4 The applicant shall obtain approval for all successive phases of the preliminary plat within two years of the signature of the City Engineer on the previous final plat as set forth in UDC 11 -6B- 7B (if applicable). 1.4.5 The preliminary plat approval shall be null and void if the applicant fails to either 1) obtain the City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years; or, 2) gain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. 1.4.6 Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Division staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11 -3B-14A. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 2.1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272 2.2 General Conditions of Approval 2.2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 2.2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at 208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 2.2.11 All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer and water, fencing, micro- paths, pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. 2.2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 2.2.18 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.2.21 100 Watt and 250 Watt, high-pressure sodium street lights shall be required on all public roadways per the City of Meridian Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found on the city of meridian Public Works Department’s website at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. 2.2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-221. 3. POLICE DEPARTMENT 3.1 The subdivision needs another access to Chinden or through the subdivision via N. Tree Farm Way. 4. FIRE DEPARTMENT 4.1 One and two family dwellings not exceeding 3,600 square feet require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute for a duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. One and two family dwellings in excess of 3,600 square feet require a minimum fire flow as specified in Appendix B of the International Fire Code. Fire Hydrant spacing shall be provided as required by Appendix C of the International Fire Code. 4.2 Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department in accordance with International Fire Code Section (IFC) 508.5.4 as follows: a. Fire hydrants shall have the 4 ½” outlet face the main street or parking lot drive aisle. Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 b. Fire hydrants shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications. d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits. e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10’. f. Fire hydrants shall be placed 18” above finished grade to the center of the 4 ½” outlets. g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of IFC Section 509.5. h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing buildings within 1,000 feet of the project. 4.3 In accordance with International Fire Code Section 503.2.5 and Appendix D, any roadway greater than 150 feet in length that is not provided with an outlet shall be required to have an approved turn around. Phasing of the project may require a temporary approved turn around on streets greater than 150' in length with no outlet. 4.4 All entrances, internal roads, drive aisles, and alleys shall have a turning radius of 28’ inside and 48’ outside, per International Fire Code Section 503.2.4. 4.5 All common driveways shall be straight or have a turning radius of 28’ inside and 48’ outside and have a clear driving surface of 20’ in width capable of supporting an imposed weight of 75,000 GVW, per International Fire Code Section 503.2. 4.6 Requirements for dead-end fire apparatus access roads that are between 500’-750’ in length are as follows: 1) Roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway District cross section standards and have a clear driving surface of 26-feet in width available at all times and shall have no parking; 2) Streets less than 32-feet in width shall have no parking on one side; and 3) Streets more than 39- feet in width shall be allowed to have parking on both sides. These measurements shall be based on the drivable surface dimension. Special approval is required for access roads over 750’ in length per International Fire Code Table D103.6.1. and D103.6.2. The roadway shall be able to accommodate an imposed load of 75,000 GVW. 4.7 Provide signage (“No Parking Fire Lane”) for all fire lanes in accordance with International Fire Code Sections 503.4 & D103.6. 4.8 Ensure that all yet undeveloped parcels are maintained free of combustible vegetation as set forth in International Fire Code Section 304.1.2. 4.9 Fire lanes, streets, and structures (including the canopy height of mature trees) shall have a vertical clearance of 13’6 as set forth in International Fire Code Section 503.2.1. 4.10 To increase emergency access to the site a minimum of two points of access will be required for any portion of the project which serves more than 30 homes, as set forth in International Fire Code Section D107.1. The two entrances should be separated by no less than ½ the diagonal measurement of the full development as set forth in International Fire Code Section D104.3. The applicant shall provide a stub street to the property to the (west/east/north/south). 4.11 The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway District cross section standards and have a clear driving surface. Streets less than 26’ in width shall have no on-street parking; streets less than 32’ in width shall have parking only on one side. These measurements shall be based on the drivable surface dimension exclusive of shoulders. The overhead clearance shall be a minimum of 13’ 6”. The roadway shall be able to accommodate an imposed load of 75,000 GVW as set forth in International Fire Code Section 503.2.1. and D103.6.1 and D103.6.2. 4.12 The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the development of this project be equipped with Opticom sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. The cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer. (National Fire Protection Std 1141 Section 5.2.11.1) Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 4.13 All portions of the buildings located on this project must be within 150’ of a paved surface as measured around the perimeter of the building as set forth in International Fire Code Section 503.1.1. 4.14 Emergency response routes and fire lanes shall not be allowed to have traffic calming devices installed without prior approval of the Fire Code Official. National Fire Protection Standard 1141, Section A5.2.18. 5. REPUBLIC SERVICES 5.1 Republic Services wants to ensure that the garbage totes get to the curb for pickup. 6. PARKS DEPARTMENT 6.1 Parks Department has no comments 7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 7.1 A staff report from ACHD has not yet been received. Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. REZONE FINDINGS: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant the rezone, the Council shall make the following findings: a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; The Applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property to the R-4 and R-8 zoning districts consistent with the adjacent Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential land use designations. Therefore, Council finds the amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan (see section VII above). b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Council finds that the proposed map amendment to the R-4 from R-2, R-8, and R-15 and to the R-8 from C-C and R-15 zoning districts is generally consistent with the purpose statement of the district. c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. City utilities will be extended at the expense of the applicant. Council considered any oral or written testimony that was provided when determining this finding. d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts; and Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. Exhibit A Tree Farm Subdivision H-2016-0128 PAGE 19 c. The annexation (as applicable) is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E). Not applicable. 2. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: a. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; Council finds that the proposed plat with 161 building lots is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section VII, of the Staff Report for more information. b. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property upon development. See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers.) c. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. d. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Council relies upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc.) to determine this finding. (See Exhibit B for more detail.) e. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. Council considered any public testimony that was presented when determining whether or not the proposed subdivision may cause health, safety or environmental problems. f. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. Council is unaware of any natural, scenic or historic features on this site. Therefore, Council finds that the proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural, scenic or historic feature(s) of major importance. Council should reference any public testimony that may be presented to determine whether or not the proposed development may destroy or damage a natural or scenic feature(s) of major importance. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5F PROJECT NUMBER: H-2016-0128 ITEM TITLE: Tree Farm Subdivision Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order of Denial for a Request for Reconsideration for the Tree Farm Subdivision (H-2016-0128) MEETING NOTES F1 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW, DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL FOR REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 1 OF 4 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 04-04-17 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE TREE FARM SUBDIVISION FOR M3 DEVELOPMENT, LLC, APPLICANT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. H-2016-0128 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL The above entitled matter received two Requests for Reconsideration, filed by Lyn Southam and Susan Fillman respectively, having come for hearing on April 4, 2017, at the hour of 6:00 o’clock p.m. at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. The City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore make the following Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law, Decision, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Local Land Use Planning Act and the Uniform Development Code have strict procedures that must be followed in all land use applications. 2. The City required neighborhood meeting with the applicant and surrounding properties was held on November 2, 2016. The sign in sheet from the meeting has 41 signatures/names listed as being there or being represented. 3. The application for rezone and preliminary plat was submitted by M3 Development on November 15, 2016. 4. Vicinity Notices to properties within 300 feet of the boundaries of this application, as required by the City Code, were mailed on December 8, 2016. 5. The public notice signs, as required by the City Code, were posted on the property on December 26, 2016. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW, DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL FOR REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 2 OF 4 6. The newspaper of record notice, as required by the Idaho State and Meridian City Codes, were published on December 19th and January 2nd for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on January 5, 2017. 7. The Commission made a recommendation to approve the project as presented. The matter was then forwarded to the City Council for a new public hearing. 8. New vicinity notices for the City Council hearing were mailed on January 13, 2017 for the City Council meeting of February 7, 2017. 9. The newspaper of record notice for the City Council meeting on February 7, 2017, was published on January 20, 2017. 10. The public notice signs on the property were updated on January 27, 2017. 11. The City Code requires signage along existing streets. This property currently only has one stub street to it. (N. Snow Cherry St.) Planning staff required two additional signs to assist with notice to the public. The City can only require signs be placed on the applicant’s property and not off site. All the signs were posted properly. 12. The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) held a meeting on January 25, 2017 and approved the project and the Commission voted to grant the applicant’s request for a modification of policy, allowing them to use the Tree Farm Way to access the first two phases of the development, or Ninety (90) building lots. 13. No request for reconsideration or appeal was filed in regards to the ACHD decision. 14. The City Council hearing was held on February 7, 2017 and the application was approved as presented. 15. The Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order were approved on February 21, 2017. 16. The City accepted the letter dated February 16, 2017 from Lyn Southam on February 22, 2017 as compliant with MCC 1-7-10 as a valid request for reconsideration for the Tree Farm approval. Mr. Southam filed two additional documents to supplement his request on March 3, 2017 and March 7, 2017. They are part of the record of this matter. 17. The City also received a second Request for Reconsideration on March 3, 2017 from Michial and Susan Fillman that was accepted. The Fillman’s supplemented their Request on March 8, 2017. They are part of the record of this matter. 18. The City Council held a hearing on the two Requests for Reconsideration on April 4, 2017. 19, At the April 4ch hearing Lyn Southam and Susan Fillman were allowed to provide supplemental information to original requests for reconsideration. 20. The applicant, M3 Development, was also given an opportunity to supplement their response to the requests for reconsideration. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). B. The Meridian City Council shall apply the standards listed in Idaho Code §67-6535 and §1- 7-10 of the Meridian City Code to review the requests for reconsideration. C. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the parties filing the requests for reconsideration and the applicant. D. This denial is based upon the staff, applicant, and public comments received on April 4, 2017 at the public hearing before the City Council. DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby order and this does order: That the two requests for reconsideration are denied. The requests have failed to identify specific deficiencies in the City Council's decision of February 7, 2017 in their approval of the Tree Farm application as required by law. An affected person aggrieved by a final decision concerning matters identified in section 67-6521(1)(a), Idaho Code, may within twenty-eight (28) days after all remedies have been exhausted under local ordinances seek judicial review as provided by chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of April, 2017. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEMBER KEITH BIRD VOTED COUNCILMEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED .0 COUNCILMEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED Yep FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW, DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL FOR REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 3 OF 4 COUNCILMEMBER GENESIS MILAM VOTED YA COUNCILMEMBER TY PALMER VOTED COUNCILMEMBER ANN LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED Ye4 MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: Z./ / / MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: MAYOR T7 de WEERD ATTEST: 2GOr �G\ CifvOf o CJAY COkES, CITY CLERK E ID ' IANC. m pAM CAL Copy served upon Applicant, the Community Development Department, Public Works Department, and City Attorney. By: C.. �V/ Cfo 4f Dated: Ll 11 / X�/ City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW, DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL FOR REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION (H-2016-0128) PAGE 4 OF 4 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5G PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0037 ITEM TITLE: Avebury Subdivision Final Plaf Modification for Avebury Subdivision (H-2017-0037) By AD800, LLC MEETING NOTES r✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5H PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0038 ITEM TITLE: Vicenza No 3. Final Plat Modification for Vicenza No 3. (H-2017-0038) by Cottonwood Development, LLC Located West of McMillian Road Between North Black Cat Road and North Ten Mile Road MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 51 PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0039 ITEM TITLE: Vicenza Subdivision No 4. Final Plat Modification for Vicenza Subdivision No 4. (H-2017-0039) By Cottonwood Development LLC MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5J PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0023 ITEM TITLE: Volterra Heights No. 3 Final Plat for Volterra Heights No. 3 (H-2017-0023) by Cottonwood Development Located South Side of W. McMillan Road and West of N. Ten Mile Road MEETING NOTES 1?1 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5K PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0022 ITEM TITLE: Vicenza Subdivision No. 5 Final Plat for Vicenza Subdivision No. 5 (H-2017-0022) by Cottonwood Development Located North Side of W. McMillan Road and East of N. Black Cat Road MEETING NOTES ur APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5L PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0021 ITEM TITLE: Vicenza Subdivision No. 6 Final Plat for Vicenza Subdivision No. 6 (H-2017-0021) by Cottonwood Development Located North Side of W. McMillan Road and East of N. Black Cat Road MEETING NOTES HI APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5M PROJECT NUMBER: 1V, ITEM TITLE: Volterra Heights Subdivision No. 2 Final Plat Modification for Volterra Heights Subdivision No. 2. (H-2017-0040) By Cottonwood Development, LLC Located North of West McMillian Road Between North Black Cat Road and North Ten Mile Road MEETING NOTES &I APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5N PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0033 ITEM TITLE: Hill's Century Farm Subdivision No 6. Final Plat for Hill's Century Farm Subdivision No 6. (H-2017-0033) By Brighton Investments Located South of East Amity Road and East of South Eagle Road MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 50 PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0030 ITEM TITLE: Paramount No. 33 Final Plat for Paramount No. 33 (H-2017-0030) by Brighton Land Holdings Located Approximately 740 Feet South of W. Chinden Boulevard on the West Side of N. Meridian Road MEETING NOTES rte✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE; E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5P PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0034 ITEM TITLE: Fall Creek Subdivision No. 4 Final Plat for Fall Creek Subdivision No. 4 (H-2017-0034) By Thomas Coleman, Toll ID I, LLC Located on the East Side of South Linder Road, Approximately 1/3 Mile South of West Overland Road MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5Q PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0035 ITEM TITLE: Heron Ridge Estates Subdivision No 2. Final Plat for Heron Ridge Estates Subdivision No 2. (H-2017-0035) By The Ewing Company Located at North of Chinden Boulevard, South of the Phyllis Canal and Approximately a 1/2 Mile East of North Black Cat Road MEETING NOTES L✓i APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5R PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Resolution No. 17-2004A: Amended Clerk's Office Fee Schedule MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 17-2004A BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE; AUTHORIZING THE CLERK'S OFFICE TO COLLECT SUCH FEES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, following publication of notice according to the requirements of Idaho Code section 63-1311A, on March 21, 2017, the City Council of Meridian held a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Meridian City Clerk's Office Fee Schedule as set forth in Exhibit,4 hereto; WHEREAS, following such hearing, on March 21, 2017, the City Council, by formal motion, did approve said proposed Fee Schedule of the Meridian City Clerk's Office; and WHEREAS, because the attachment to the resolution effectuating such motion contained a clerical error, this corrected resolution shall supersede Resolution no. 17-2004; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the Fee Schedule of the Meridian City Clerk's Office, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the City Clerk's Office is hereby authorized to implement and carry out the collection of said fees. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho this I T day of April, 2017. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of April, 2017. APPROVED: ATTEST; Z, Tammy de e rd, Mayor G0�kPORAOq ry Col 400 j�d �jd W L Clerk ADOPTION OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FEE SCHEDULE PAGE I OF 2 ADOPTION OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK ’S OFFICE FEE SCHEDULE PAGE 2 OF 2 Exhibit A FEE SCHEDULE OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CLERK ’S OFFICE FEE TYPE FEE AMOUNT Beer license – retail $50.00 Beer license – by the drink $200.00 Wine license – retail $200.00 Wine license – by the drink $200.00 Liquor license – by the drink $562.50 Alcohol catering permit $20.00 Liquor/beer/wine license transfer $100.00 Citizen’s Use Permit $50.00 Fireworks Display Permit $125.00 Retail Sales of Non-Aerial Common Fireworks Permit $25.00 Temporary Use Permit – Special Event/Outdoor Market (in a park) $150.00 Temporary Use Permit – Special Event/Outdoor Market (not in a park) $85.00 Temporary Use Permit – Promotional Sales Unit $65.00 Temporary Use Permit – Temporary Sales Unit $65.00 Temporary Use Permit – Subdivision Model Home/Real Estate Sales Office $65.00 Temporary Use Permit – Temporary Indoor Event $100.00 Mobile Sales Unit License* $81.50 Pawnbroker License without Precious Metal Dealer Endorsement – Renewal $30.00 Pawnbroker License without Precious Metal Dealer Endorsement – New* $71.50 Pawnbroker License with Precious Metal Dealer Endorsement – Renewal $30.00 Pawnbroker License with Precious Metal Dealer Endorsement – New* $71.50 Precious Metal Dealer License – New* $71.50 Precious Metal Dealer License – Renewal $30.00 Paper copies of public record information 0-100 pages: No charge 101 or more pages: $0.10/page Attorney labor to redact nonpublic records Hours 1 and 2: No charge Hours 3 and up: $60.00/hour Other labor to respond to public records request Hours 1 and 2: No charge Hours 3 and up: $30.00/hour CD or DVD with public record information $1.00 each NSF check fee $20.00 Dairy Days Art Show Vendor fee $20.00 * Includes $41.50 ISP background check fee Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5S PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Idaho Power Utility Easement MEETING NOTES M", APPROU-0 Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS POWER. An OAdCCRP Uc pa ry PLEASE RETURN TO: 1221 W. Idaho St. (83702) ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2018-080050 P.O. Box 70 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=4 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 08/23/2018 10:49 AM Boise, ID 83707 CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Easement—Organization The City Of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation "Grantor(s)", of Ada County, State of Idaho , do hereby grant and convey to IDAHO POWER COMPANY, a Corporation, with its principal office located at 1221 W. Idaho Street, Boise, Idaho, 83702 (P.O. Box 70, Boise, ID 83707), its licensees, successors, and assigns, (collectively, "Grantee"), for One Dollar and other valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, a permanent and perpetual easement and right of way, at all times sufficient in width for the installation, erection, continued operation, maintenance, repair, alteration, inspection, and/or replacement of the following: Underground Facilities: Underground electrical power line or lines and related facilities and equipment, generally including, but not limited to, buried power lines and wires, above -ground pad -mounted transformers, junction boxes, cables, conduits, communication lines, including fiber optics, other equipment, and all related appurtenances, any of which may extend above ground, in certain locations to be determined by Grantee at Grantee's sole and absolute discretion (all of the above collectively being referred to as the "Facilities") together with the right to permit the attachment and/or use or placement of the wires, fixtures, cables and conduits of other companies or parties (all of the same being included within the definition of "Facilities"), on, over, through, under, and across the following premises belonging to Grantor(s) in Ada County, State of Idaho , in the location described below. Grantee is hereby also granted the perpetual right of ingress and egress over Grantor's other property necessary for the full and complete use, occupation, and enjoyment of the easement hereby granted, and together with all rights and privileges incident thereto, including, but not limited to, (i) the right, at Grantee's expense, to excavate and refill ditches and trenches for the location of the Facilities, (ii) the right, at Grantee's expense, to cut, trim, and remove trees, brush, bushes, sod, flowers, shrubbery, overhanging branches and other obstructions and improvements which may injure or interfere with Grantee's use, occupation, or enjoyment of this easement, and (iii) the right, at Grantee's expense, to install, construct, operate, inspect, alter, maintain, replace, improve and repair any and all aspects of Grantee's Facilities over, through, under and across the lands subject to this easement. The location of the easement and right of way granted herein is described as follows in Exhibit `A' Legal Description and shown on Exhibit `B' Survey Map attached hereto and made a part hereof Grantor shall not alter the grade or elevation of the land within the right-of-way existing on the date hereof through excavations, grading, installation of berms, or other activities without the prior written approval of Grantee. Grantor shall not place nor build any structure(s) within the easement area except fences and except as otherwise approved by Grantee in writing. This Easement shall run with the land and be binding upon the parties' successors and assigns. (Signature page immediately follows) CRE 009 (5/13) IPC Checked by: Mark Kriete Work Order#: 27471198 Executed and delivered this day of Signature(s) of Grant Incl licable): Mayor, Ta e er At ted By Ujay Coles, City Cleric �U 201 `7 Approved by City Council Corporate Verification STATE OF -11j(e&h 6— ss. COUNTY OF Aot I, �t�.�.i a n< � (Notary's Name), a notary public, do hereby certify that on this day of , 20, personally appeared before meT 1 i Yt r?ai (Individual's Name Including Title) and a, ihj 1,110%_ ,4"L�4- (Individual's Name Including Title), who, being by me first duly sworn, declared that he/she/they are respectively the duly authorized person(s) of The Citv Of Meridian (Organization Name), that he/she/thev signed the foregoing document, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same as the free act and deed on behalf of said organization, (NOTARY SEAL) Notary Public V My Commission Expires on ®51) IQ 6) U CRE 009 (5/73) We PERMANENT EASEMENT DESCRIPTION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN POWERLINE EASEMENT An easement for powerline purposes located in the SW % of the SE % of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin marking the southwesterly corner of said SW % of the SE %, from which an aluminum cap monument marking the southeasterly corner of the SE Y4 of said Section 12 bears S 89°33'27" E a distance of 2657.47 feet; Thence S 8933'27" E along the southerly boundary of said SW % of the SE % a distance of 193.37 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly boundary N 0"33'47" E a distance of 400.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing N 0°33'47" E a distance of 50.00 feet to a point; Thence S 89°31'56" E a distance of 113.99 feet to point; Thence S 0°30'05" W a distance of 10.00 feet to point; Thence N 89°31'56" W a distance of 104.00 feet to a point; Thence S 0°33'47" W a distance of 40.00 to a point; Thence N 89°31'56" W a distance of 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 1,540 square feet (0.035 acres) and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Prepared by: Glenn K. Bennett, PLS Civil Survey Consultants, Incorporated a -r November 21, 2016' ' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY POWERLINE EASEMENT DESCR/PT/ON FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC, 2893 SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208)888-4312 � NO 5082 G c� orf of p*� � N K. SOR Checked by: Mark Kriete Work Order#: 27471198 Executed and delivered this day of Signature(s) of Grant Incl licable): Mayor, Ta e er At ted By Ujay Coles, City Cleric �U 201 `7 Approved by City Council Corporate Verification STATE OF -11j(e&h 6— ss. COUNTY OF Aot I, �t�.�.i a n< � (Notary's Name), a notary public, do hereby certify that on this day of , 20, personally appeared before meT 1 i Yt r?ai (Individual's Name Including Title) and a, ihj 1,110%_ ,4"L�4- (Individual's Name Including Title), who, being by me first duly sworn, declared that he/she/they are respectively the duly authorized person(s) of The Citv Of Meridian (Organization Name), that he/she/thev signed the foregoing document, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same as the free act and deed on behalf of said organization, (NOTARY SEAL) Notary Public V My Commission Expires on ®51) IQ 6) U CRE 009 (5/73) We SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY POWERLINE EASEMENT DESCR/PT/ON FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC, 2893 SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208)888-4312 � NO 5082 G c� orf of p*� � N K. SOR Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5T PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Citadel Storage Water Main Easement MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035289 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=7 HEATHER LUTHER 04/21/2017 04:20 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE WAT ' R MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this day of ��ti 20�7 between the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the GRANTORS, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the GRANTEE; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the GRANTORS desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently connect to said pipeline from time to time by the GRANTEE; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the GRANTORS, and other good and valuable consideration, the GRANTORS do hereby give, grant and convey unto the GRANTEE the right-of-way for an easement over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easementhereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair, replacement and subsequent connection at the convenience of the GRANTEE, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said GRANTEE, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs, performing maintenance, replacements or subsequent connections to the water mains, GRANTEE shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such procedures. However, GRANTEE shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anythingplaced within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Water Main Easement REV. 08/15/16.doc THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the GRANTEE that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the GRANTEE that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. Eli] Address -:::5-/ .�� STATE OF IDAIIO ) (• SS. County of Ada ) On this Zy day of Ka -v' (-,V/, , 20 1-1 'before me, the undersigned, a Notarya Public in and for said State, personally appeared cXS u,. i_ and known or identified to me to be the =� t and 0frr iL-gcaretm�, respectively, of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and J aclGiowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. STEP�. MEYER NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO .')A �— NO ARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at: A&6L- Cou lti�l/1r- Commission Expires: M�AwrlA- $_ Z () Z3 Water Main Easement REV. 08/ 15/ 1 G.doe GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy de Attes Mayor City Clerk T r.. �. r 1� = I w m Approved By City Council On: -Ltll- ' STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss County of Ada ) On this day of , 20 j, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at: Q &U' Commission Expires: g - b D Water Main Easement REV. 08/15/16,doe Sawtooth Land 5urveying, LLC P: (208) 398-8104 f: (208) 398-8105 GordSuvcyIGLG 2030 5. Waohington Ave., Emmett, ID 83617 March 8, 2017 Citadel 4 City Water Easement BASIS OF BEARINGS for this description is South 0053'14" West, between the brass cap marking the E1/4 corner of Section 34, and the brass cap marking the southeast corner of Section 34, both in T. 4 N., R. 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land located in the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 34, T. 4 N., R. 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at a found brass cap marking the E1/4 of Section 34; Thence North 89014'46" West, coincident with the northerly line of said NE1/4 of the SEI/4 of Section 34, a distance of 45.00 feet; Thence South 0153'14" West, parallel with the easterly line of said NEI/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 34, a distance of 33.57 feet; Thence North 89014'46" West, parallel with said northerly line of the NEI/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 34, a distance of 8.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 0045'14" West, 35.00 feet; Thence North 89014'46" West, parallel with said northerly line of the NEI/4 of the SEI/4 of Section 34, a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence North 0045'14" East, 15.00 feet; Thence North 89014'46" West, parallel with said northerly line of the NEI/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 34, a distance of 8.76 feet; Thence South 001354" West, 10.03 feet; Thence North 89046'06" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 0013'54" East, 10.21 feet; Thence North 89014'46" West, parallel with said northerly line of the NEI/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 34, a distance of 196.72 feet; Thence South 0°45'14" West, 11.44 feet; Thence North 89013'46" West, 326.72 feet; P:\2016\16198 -CMG TEN MILE TOPO\Survey\Drawings\Descriptions\16198-CITADEL 4 CITY WATER EASEMENT - REV 1.docx Page 11 Thence South 004517" West, 17.55 feet; Thence North 89114'43" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 0045'17" East, 17.55 feet; Thence North 89013'46" West, 24.05 feet; Thence South 0145'09" West, 178.67 feet; Thence South 8912434" East, 28.88 feet; Thence South 0035'26" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 89124`34" West, 48.93 feet; Thence North 0145'09" East, 198.74 feet; Thence North 89013'46" West, 351.28 feet; Thence South 0045'17" West, 17.49 feet; Thence North 89°14'43" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 0045'17" East, 17.50 feet; Thence North 89013'46" West, 94.93 feet; Thence South 0°47'21" West, 178.54 feet; Thence South 89014'50" East, 30.15 feet; Thence South 0045'10" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 89014'50° West, 30.17 feet; Thence South 0°47'21" West, 19.26 feet; Thence North 89014'41" West, 60.55 feet; Thence South 0°44'16" West, 45.44 feet; Thence North 89014'46" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 004416" East, 65.44 feet; Thence South 89°14'41" East, 60.57 feet; Thence North 0047'21" East, 197.81 feet; P:\2016\16198 -CMG TEN MILE TOPO\Survey\Drawings\Descriptions\16198-CITADEL 4 CITY WATER EASEMENT - REV 1.docx Page 12 Thence North 89113'46" West, 21.52 feet; Thence North 41023'20" West, 87.32 feet to said northerly line of the NEI/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 34; Thence South 89014'46" East, coincident with said northerly line of the NEI/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 34, a distance of 26.97 feet; Thence South 41023'20" East, 60.35 feet; Thence South 89113'46" East, 867.63 feet; Thence North 0045'14' East, 11.43 feet; Thence South 89014'46" East, parallel with said northerly line of the NE1/4 of the SEI/4 of Section 34, a distance of 267.48 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 0.86 acres more or less. P:12016116198 -CMG TEN MILE TOPO1Survey\Drawings\Descriptionst16198-CITADEL 4 CITY WATER EASEMENT - REV 1.docx Page 13 od ,89'Coge M6j.Vq.0S M N M Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5U PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Newton's Nook Water Main Easement MEETING NOTES �✓i APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035290 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=7 LISA BATT 04/21/2017 04:20 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made thiV14 day of/-' between i/�/�lr/Gi�� &Z �L the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the GRANTORS, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the GRANTEE; WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, the GRANTORS desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently connect to said pipeline from time to time by the GRANTEE; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the GRANTORS, and other good and valuable consideration, the GRANTORS do hereby give, grant and convey unto the GRANTEE the right-of-way for an easement over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair, replacement and subsequent connection at the convenience of the GRANTEE, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said GRANTEE, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after malting repairs, performing maintenance, replacements or subsequent connections to the water mains, GRANTEE shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such procedures. However, GRANTEE shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Water Main Easement REV. 08/15/16.doc THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the GRANTEE that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the GRANTEE that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: P es aen�— oL% ecre a ,, /1 4,�t Address P p, 1 0- 'e- STATE - STATE OF IDAHO ) . ss. County of Ada ) s-0 6 54 So On this 1041"' day of 520 1+ before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public iV and for said State, personally ppeared, 10 {ildw15 and 4 -Pk)-�03�1_ , known or identifiA to me to be the ent and Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the within inst�r and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNES S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and afAxed my official seal the day and year first above written. / (SEAL) .0� C1OTq? Water Main Easer�t�,' . AU 6 t I G O OF ID`�a�.�`� VARY I idine at: Commission Expires: ORI1 AHO v�0a ve l REV. 08/15/16.doc GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN 01vof to W -jDl Tammy de d, Mayorm SE .o ANS n A P ofhe NFAISv�� 1 Attes�by C.Ja oles, City Clerk Approved By City Council On: L l STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss County of Ada ) On this day of At i , 20 I , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Tamtny de Weerd and C.Jay Coles, known to me to be the Mayor and City Cleric, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. -14 aA, -Ioalw, z � A44 (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at: _j:M OH -t' OU /Lout.% Commission Expires: 1,I) -, !)OC V i � S 'ti • ,, STAT Water Main Easement REV. 08/15/16.doc February 14, 2017 Project No. 116022 THE LAND GROUP, INC. EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER LINE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION Page 1 of 2 Those portions of Parcels B and C according to Record of Survey No. 10499 recorded under Instrument No. 2016-046927, Ada County Records and those portions of Lots 3 and 4 of Newton's Nook Subdivision filed in Book 98 at Page 12383, Ada County Records, said portions located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the northwest corner of said Parcel B; Thence, along the west line of said Parcel B, South 00°35'24" West, 79.40 feet; Thence, departing from said west line, South 89°24'36" East, 20.38 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence, North 00° 33' 08" East, 33.14 feet; Thence, North 90° 00' 00" East, 23.00 feet; Thence, South 00° 33'08" West, 30.44 feet; Thence, South 89° 26' 52" East, 13.07 feet; Thence, South 48° 48' 52" East, 22.51 feet; Thence, North 90° 00'00" East, 88.07 feet; Thence, South 00° 00'00" East, 24.00 feet; Thence, North 90° 00'00" West, 81.67 feet; Thence, South 00° 35' 33" West, 42.96 feet; Thence, South 89° 24' 35" East, 25.98 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 3; Thence, along the north line of said Lot 3, South 89° 24' 35" East, 16.63 feet; Thence, departing from said north line, South 00° 35' 25" West, 6.00 feet; Thence, North 89° 24' 35" West, 42.61 feet; Thence, South 000 35' 33" West, 31.70 feet; Thence, South 33° 09' 27" East, 32.40 feet; Thence, South 00° 35' 33" West, 15.89 feet to the south line of said Parcel 3; Thence, along said south line, North 89° 24'43" West, 20.00 feet; Thence, departing from said south line, North 00° 35' 33" East, 9.83 feet; Thence, North 33° 08' 59" West, 32.40 feet; Thence, North 00° 35' 33" East, 37.76 feet; Thence, North 89° 24' 35" West, 48.32 feet; Thence, North 00° 35' 25" East, 6.00 feet to the north line of said Lot 4; Thence, along last said north line, South 89° 24' 35" East, 19.31 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 4; Ar Site Planning ® Landscape Architecture ® Civil Engineering ® Golf Course Irrigation & Engineering ® Graphic Communication ® Surveying 462 E. Shore Drive, Ste. 100, Eagle, Idaho 83616 e P 208.939.4041 F 208.939.4445 e www.theland rrouiinc�com THE LAND GROUP, INC. Thence, departing from said Lot 4, South 89° 24' 35" East, 29.01 feet; Thence, North 00° 35' 33" East, 39.61 feet; Thence, North 45° 00'00" West, 55.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 0.166 acres or 7,221 square feet, more or less. PREPARED BY: THE LAND GROUP, INC. 462 E. SHORE DRIVE, SUITE 100 EAGLE, IDAHO 83616 208-939-4041 208-939-4445(fax) Robert L. Kazarinoff fir Site Planning -Landscape Architecture *Civil Engineering ® Golf Course Irrigation & Engineering *Graphic Communication ®Surveying 462 E. Shore Drive, Ste. 100, Eagle, Idaho 83616 9 P 208.939.4041 F 208.939.4445 ® www.thelandgrouginc.com Re Location: g*\2016\116022\ca"owey\exhibfts\I 16022 water easement permund in 170213.dwg Last Plotted By:rob Warned Date fthed: Tuesday, February 14 2017 at 11:20 APA M =r cr LOT 48, BLK 4 1/ FRANKLIN SQUARE LOT 33, BLK 4 FRANKLIN SQUARE SUB. SUB. O C) M S'P M W C) ch 02 S00035'24"W M 0 0 zo -O> M c') Ll c") I IT- 0 4> L18 _1121 L3rn > Do z M 77 > L12 cn 0 C) C= 0 po L14 C.0 CD c:) 0 C? P C) C?C=) C) M 0 > 00 ca M C) Cl C) M :5 CD CD x cn ;xz 2: 1 �- 76 M> C) 03 2-1 M —4 MM M Do r - M 91 — R/W r *- R/W — R/W S. WEST 5TH AVENUE bl M r— 1 -0 cn M C) CD .91 J� f.0 X C.0 O N) C=) I. A > Sheet Thle: EXHIBIT "B" cn 00 i co 0 M ro -P�- r- > c') CD cl) (-- M caM C�) Na r - M ca M r- C) � CD o WATER LINE EASEMENT CO M x <o ---4 I CD C) M S'P M W C) ch 02 S00035'24"W M 0 0 zo -O> M c') Ll c") I IT- 0 4> L18 _1121 L3rn > Do z M 77 > L12 cn 0 C) C= 0 po L14 C.0 CD c:) 0 C? P C) C?C=) C) M 0 > 00 ca M C) Cl C) M :5 CD CD x cn ;xz 2: 1 �- 76 M> C) 03 2-1 M —4 MM M Do r - M 91 — R/W r *- R/W — R/W S. WEST 5TH AVENUE bl M r— 1 -0 cn M C) CD .91 J� f.0 X C.0 O N) C=) I. A g Sheet Thle: EXHIBIT "B" ION4100 CITY OF MERIDIAN Na o WATER LINE EASEMENT WATERLINE EASEMENT Idaho fin Location: g:\2016\116022\cafturvey\sxhibds\116022 water easement pennwod W 170213."ll Last Plotted 8pob kunr off Date Plotted: Tuesday, February 14 2017 at 1038 AIA M w INv � o cD CO � rn cn .tom w 1Zi'I z z cn cn z z z z z z w w W � O w oo O O° o W W o cr � w rn � � O CD CO O � O O � � W O O W N N W CJi N � CA.) C.y1 O W W CJl N 'p' CA.) � O co T�t C) CJl W�� A .A �_ w� cr0 Oro V � CrJ'1 � W N r —� N —` O z —1 Pi'1 r7'1 rn rT'1 � 1'1'1 cn C) z cn w cn � � w o w cn � � C:) z z � C:) C.0 c:)o cwD � oho 0 D � rn `w --� N W C)'1 N J� W CJ1 fV .p N �A c') � O O .p W N W (T W O O W W V � O W � WC � U7 CwJI CWJ7 CA) O N_ N W O OOo O W 00 � V —� G � � I'1'i Pi'I � rTl t•T'1 t'1'i � I'T'I ITI N � O O CO O cr r /� W .A — io cr M CD co f c:) o g a– o - a I Sheet Ttl EXHIBIT "B" g y CITY OF MERIDIAN g o� o '�� WATER LINE EASEMENT g N $ City of Meridian Ada County, Idaho q g Ad � w INv � o cD CO � rn cn .tom w 1Zi'I z z cn cn z z z z z z w w W � O w oo O O° o W W o °° � w rn � � O CD CO O � O O � � W O O W N N W CJi N � CA.) C.y1 O W W CJl N 'p' CA.) � O co T�t C) CJl W�� A .A �_ w� W W w � z —1 Pi'1 r7'1 1'T'7 rT'1 � 1'1'1 rn `w --� N � 07 N CJT � N N �A N N —� W W O N W W W Z V � O W � OHO O N v ? O N O O O W 00 � V —� W O W �A N � O O CO O � w INv � o cD CO � rn cn .tom w 1Zi'I z z cn cn z z z z z z w w W � O w oo O O° o W W o °° � w rn � � O CD CO O � O O � � W O O W N N W CJi N � CA.) C.y1 O W W CJl N 'p' CA.) � O co T�t C) CJl W�� A .A �_ w� W W w � z —1 Pi'1 r7'1 1'T'7 rT'1 � 1'1'1 C�J1 CWD CND CD � OHO V N � O Cil N V O O W 00 W V -P W O W .p N � O O CO O Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5V PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Newton's Nook No.I Release of Water Easement MEETING NOTES [Yf APPROVEP Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE; E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035127 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=2 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/21/2017 01:50 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN RELEASE OF WATER MAIN EASEMENT No. 1 GRANTOR: PENWOOD III LLC GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO WHEREAS, by easement dated August 16'x', 2005, and recorded on February 2" d, 2006 as Instrument Number 106017068 of the records of Ada County, State of Idaho, Penwood III LLC granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, a main easement for the construction, operation and maintenance of a water line over and across the real property legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. WHEREAS, the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable and a replacement easement will be recorded in the future NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Meridian does hereby release and abandon the said rights and easements hereinabove referred to and described, with the intent that the same shall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this day of f l (. , 2017 CITY OF MERIDIAN /_.,RAT EDAM,_ V VT\ $y,�/l�?� E ol.y or w Tan Z rd, Mayor tD / m ,r,0 ATTEST SEA C y Col , City Clerk �� i av/ STATE OF IDAHO ss County of Ada ) On thisjf-- day of - 2017, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and Clay Coles, know or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ` J 1 Notary Publicfo 0 Residing at: `7/ 1.t-C.i AL&� y0 4 �U' Commission expires: Q -,10 JA� t® EXHIBIT A - EASEMENT TO BE RELEASED Land in Lot 10, Block 1 of Troutner Park Subdivision, as per the Plat thereof, in Book 75, at Pages 7762-7764, Ada County Plat Records, within the NEI/4 of Section 13, T3N, R1 E, B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows; ' COMMENCING at the Northwest Corner of said NE1/4 (North 1/4 corner of Section 13), marked by a brass cap as per corner perpetuation record, Inst. No. 98117248; thence, along the North Line of said Section 13, South 89015'42" East, 966.57 feet; thence South 00°52'49' West, 45.00 feet, to the Northeast Comer of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Subdivision; thence along the boundary of said subdivision, the following three (3) calls; 1. South 00°52'49' West, 568.80 feet; 2. North 711,25'40" East, 317.12 feet; 3. South 00°52'45" West, 802.35 feet, to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, and to a set 5/8 inch rebar with a plastic survey cap marked "PLS 10782"; thence along the North Line of said Lot 10, South 89110'56" East, 323.02 feet, to a set 5/8 inch rebar with a plastic survey cap marked "PLS 10782"; thence, continuing, South 8910'56" East, 200 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of SW 51" Avenue and the Northeast comer of said Lot 10; thence, along said right-of-way, South 00053'16" West, 238.80 feet, to the Southeast corner of said Lot 10; thence North 89006'44" West, 2.00 feet, to a set 5/8 inch rebar with a plastic survey cap marked "PLS 10782", a witness corner; thence, continuing, North 89006'44" West, 114.15 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence the following 26 (twenty-six) calls. 1. North 891106'44" West 20.00 feet; 2. North 00053'32" East 9.83 feet; 3. North 32°51'28" West 32.40 feet; 4. North 00153'32" East 37.76 feet; 5_ North 89°06'36" West 48.32 feet; 6, North 00053'24" East 6.00 feet; 7. South 89006'36" East 48.32 feet; 8. North 00053'32" East 57,00 feet; 9. South 89006'36" East 12.00 feet; 10. North 00053'32" East 20.00 feet; 11. North 89006'36" West 60.62 feet; 12. North 00104" East 6,00 feet; 13. South 89106'36" East 111,24 feet; 14, South 00153'24" West 6.00 feet; 15. North 89°06'36" West 39.61 feet; 16. South 00153'32" West 20.00 feel; 17. South 89106'36" East 20.31 feel; 18. South 00153'24" West 20.00 feet; 19. North 89°06'36" West 23.31 feel; 20. South 00°53'32" West 37,00 feet; 21, South 89106'36" Easi 42.61 feel; 22, South 00°53'24" West 6.00 feet; 23. North 89°06'36° West 42.61 feet; 24. South 00153'32" West31.70 feet; 25, South 3215128" Eas132.40 feet; 26. South 00153'32" West 15,89 feet; to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5W PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Newton's Nook No. 2 Release of Water Main Easement MEETING NOTES u APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035128 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=2 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/21/2017 01:51 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN RELEASE OF WATER MAIN EASEMENT No, 2 GRANTOR: PENWOOD III LLC GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO WHEREAS, by easement dated June 21", 2016, and recorded on Stine 23`a, 2016 as Instrument Number 2016- 055041 of the records of Ada .County, State of Idaho, Penwood III LLC granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, a water main easement for the construction, operation and maintenance of a water line over and across the real property legally described in Exhibit "A attached` hereto and incorporated'herein. WHEREAS, the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable and a replacement easement will be recorded In the future NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Ivlefidian does hereby release and abandon the said rights and casements hereinabove referred to and described, with *the intent that the same shall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized. this a day of r i L 2017 CITY OF MERIDIAN \GO�Q6RP'TEOp�cG� f �.��,, By C-'�1 C. �r Tamni eerd, Mayor j m S D �ANA.- ATTEST C. Coles. 'itv Clerk STATE OF IDAHO } ss County of Ada ) -On this day of 201.7, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles, know or identified t me to be the Mayor rtrtd Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have horounto set my hand and affixed my official sea(the day and year in this certificate first above written. k�b�'1'4A Notary Public bo Idaho Residing at:vtj Ec tti) Commission expires: 1Z c, —,2p --aO EXHIBIT A — EASEMENT TO BE RELEASED An easement located in a portion of Lot 5 of Newton's Nook Subdivision, Book 98, Page 12383, as recorded in official records of Ada County, situated in the Northeast One Quarter of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of said Newton's Nook Subdivision, marked by a 5/8" steel pin with orange plastic cap "NE PLS 107820; thence on the north boundary line of said Newton's Nook Subdivision, South 89"28'56" Fast, 72.70; thence leaving said north boundary line, South 00°3524" West, 74.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 89°24'36" East, 49.57 feet, to a point on the westerly line of an existing water line easement, Inst#106017068, as recorded in official records of Ada County; Thence on said westerly line, South 00°35'24" West, 6.00 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line, North 89°2436" West, 49.57 feet; Thence North 00°35'24" East, 6,01) feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5X PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: St. Ignatius Release of Water and Sewer Main Easement MEETING NOTES rte✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035129 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=2 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/21/2017 01:51 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN RELEASE OF WATER AND SEWER MAIN EASEMENT GRANTOR: ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BOISE GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO WHEREAS, by easement dated August 1st, 2016, and recorded on August 25th, 2016 as Instrument Number 2016-079048 of the records of Ada County, State of Idaho, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, a water and sewer main easement for the construction, operation And maintenance of water and sewer lines over and across the real property legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. WHEREAS, the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable and replacement easements will be recorded in the futtu•e NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Meridian does hereby release and abandon the said rights and easements- hereinabove referred to and described, with the intent that the sarne sliall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents t0 be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 1 day of A P r 1'L, , 2017 CITY OF MERIDIAN O`�, VT\ ZO ifl By City of w Tamin We rd, Mayor �—� ►'L E IDIAN tOAHO ATTEST / C•7a Cole , City Clerk SEAL STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this day of 2017, before me, a Notary Public,'personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles, know or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively ,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed.the same. IN WITNESS WHEIZEOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this t-PHiiit4.1p. iiret ;f nw-..lVri1tP.n - n Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: -zw —tij Commission expires; -- 3o AD �j EXHIBIT A - EASEMENT TO BE RELEASED Exhibit "A" St. Ignatius School WATER AND SEWER EASEMENT DESCRIPTION An easement situated in a portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range i East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest Section Corner of said Section 30, marked by a brass cap monument; thence on the west section line of said Section 30, South 00'25'09" West, 1069.50 feet, to a point, from which the West One Quarter Comer of sold Section 30 bears, South 00'25'09° West, 1591.61 feet; thence leaving said west section line, South 89'52'46" East, 48.00 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of North Meridian Road; thence on said right-of-way line, North 00'25'09" East, 14.23 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing on said right -of -Way line, North 00' 2S'09" East, 20A9 feet Thence leaving said right-of-way line, North 77' 51153" East, 44.13 feet; Thence North 00' 25'03' East, 187.78 feet; Thence North 83' 52'47" East, 124.72 feet; Thence North 34' 21'19" East, 12.07 feet; Thence South 79' 21' 18" West, 31.99 feet; Thence North 89' 34'51" West, 142,33 feet to a point on the aforementioned easterly right-of-way line; Thence on said right-of-way line, North 00' 25'09" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving said right-of-way line, South 89' 34'51" East, 120.03 feet; Thence North 00' 25'09" East, 9.00 feet; Thence South 89' 36'27" East 20.00 feet; Thence South 00' 25'09" West, 9.01 feet; Thence South 89' 34' 51" East, 0.36 feet; Thence North 79' 21' 18" East, 50.05 feet; Thence North 34' 21'18' East, 58.55 feet; Thence South 89' 33'36" East, 394.23 feet; Thence North 77' 57'41' East, 121.14 feet; Thence North 00' 25'16" East, 332.38 feet; Thence South 89' 34'43" East, 20.00 feet; Thence South OD' 25'16" West, 51.75 feet; Thence South 89'33'36" East, 298.62 feet to a point on the easterly boundary line of Parcel "A" as shown on Record of Survey Number 10478, Ada County Records; Thence on said easterly boundary line, South 00' 29'32" West, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving said easterly boundary line, North 89'33'36' West, 298.60 feet; Thence South 00' 25'16" West, 276.70 feet; Thence South 77'57'41" West, 139,39 feet; Thence North 89'33'3611 West, 385.77 feet; Thence South 34' 21'18" West, 27.90 feet; Thence North 79' 21'18" East, 68.23 feet; Thence South 89'34'54" East, 430.14 feet; Thence South 00'25'03" West, 27258 feet; Thence North 89' 52'48" West, 140.78 feet; Thence South 00' 27'51" West, 10.06 feet; Thence North 89' 32'09" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 00' 27'51" East, 9.94 feet; Thence North 89' 52'48" West, 346.70 feet; Thence South 00' 08'36" East, 21.99 feet to a point on the southerly boundary line of Parcel "B" as shown on Record of Survey Number 10478, Ada County Records; Thence on said southerly boundary line, North 89' 52'46' West, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving said southerly boundary line, North 00' 08136" West, 41.99 feet; Thence South 89' 52'4811 East, 25.42 feet; Thence North 00'17'49" East, 22.68 feet; Thence South 89' 42'11" East, 20.00 feet; Thence South 00' 17'49" West, 22.62 feet; Thence South 89' 52'48" East, 462.26 feet; Thence North 00' 25'03" East, 232.69 feet; Thence North 89' 34'54" West, 159,15 feet; Thence South 00' 26'24" West, 25,56 feet; Thence North 89' 33' 36" West, 28.77 feet; Thence North 00' 26'45" East, 25.55 feet, Thence North 89' 34'54" West, 220.29 feet; Thence South 79' 21'18" West, 86.29 feet; Thence South 34' 21'18" West, 41.30 feet; Thence South 83'52'47" West, 116.11 feet; Thence South 00' 25'03" West, 185.97 feet Thence South 77' 51'53" West, 64.62 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described easement contains 1.45 acres, more at loss and is subject to all existing easements an right-of-ways. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5Y ITEM TITLE: St. Ignatius Sewer Easement PROJECT NUMBER: MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035130 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=7 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/21/2017 01:51 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT tot� THIS INDENTURE, made this day o , 201, between ,the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called he Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipeline from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of a sewer line over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a sanitary sewer line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance, However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area Sewer Main Easement REV. 08/15/16 described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: % /f t &J / �-�n c cs ! j 1 S �� l p I � Address STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) On this a'7 day of nA , 20J, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Reu. Denn; s W4ss mwl-&yG- and known or identified to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day above written, (SEAL) '; 2W14 -m all ® _ NOTARY PUBLIC FOV IDAAIO aq'{"t/,W : ®®®' ®If Residing at: Commission Expires: fi 5' -?-wo weid�ja�t° REV. 08/15/16 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy de Wer , Mayor 'I-- Att& by C,Ja Coles, City Clerk /Qev uT r a° 'o C%W(Uv of E IDIAN*,-- IpANp SEAL Approved By City Council On: �/ / J/ ?017 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) On this ,J day of , 20—LV—, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and C,JAY COLES known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written, NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO (SEAL) Residingat;`IlnyjC j'c, o A , Commission Expires; V — ,�D-j D ,'LD Sewer Main Easement REV, 08/15/16 March 20, 2017 Project No. 115210 THE LAN11 GROUP, INC. Exhibit "A" St. Ignatius School SEWER EASEMENT DESCRIPTION That portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows; COMMENCING at the Northwest Section Corner of said Section 30, marked by a brass cap monument; thence along the west section line of said Section 30, South 00°25'09" West, 1069.50 feet, to a point, from which the West One Quarter Corner of said Section 30 bears, South 00°25'09" West, 1591.61 feet; thence leaving said west section line, South 8952'46" East, 48.00 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of North Meridian Road; thence along said right-of-way line, North 00°25'09" East, 14.23 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence, continuing along said right-of-way line, North 00° 25'09" East, 20.49 feet; Thence, leaving said right-of-way line, North 77° 51'53" East, 44.13 feet; Thence, North 00° 25'03" East, 187,78 feet; Thence, North 83° 52'47" East, 124.72 feet; Thence, North 34° 21' 18" East, 98.91 feet; Thence, South 89° 33'36" East, 394.23 feet; Thence, North 77° 57'41" East, 121.14 feet; Thence, North 00° 25' 16" East, 332.38 feet; Thence, South 89° 34'43" East, 20.00 feet; Thence, South 00° 25'16" West, 51.75 feet; Thence, South 89° 33'36" East, 298.73 feet to the easterly line of Parcel A as shown on Record of Survey No. 10478, Ada County Records; Thence, along the easterly lines of Parcels A and B as shown on said Record of Survey, South 00° 28'36" West, 20.00 feet; Thence, leaving the easterly line of said Parcel B, North 89° 33' 36" West, 298.71 feet; Thence, South 00° 25' 16" West, 276.70 feet; Thence, South 77° 57'41" West, 139.39 feet; Thence, North 89° 33'36" West, 385,77 feet; Thence, South 34° 21'18" West, 97.48 feet; Thence, South 83° 52'47" West, 116.11 feet; Jor Site Planning • Landscape Architecture • Civil Engineering • Golf Course irrigation & Engineering • Graphic Design • Surveying 462 E, Shore Drive, Suite 100 • Eagle, Idaho 83616 • P 208.939.4041 • www.thelandgroupinc.com St. Ignatius School Sewer Easement Description Pagel 2 of 2 Thence, South 00° 25'03" West, 185.97 feet; Thence, South 770 51'53" West, 64.62 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 0.744 acres or 32,392 square feet, more or less. PREPARED BY; THE LAND GROUP, INC. Robert L. Kazarinoff, PLS, 03/20/2017 0 Site Planning • Landscape,Architecture.- Civil Engineering - Golf Course Irrigation & Engineering - Graphic Design • Surveying 462 E. Shore Drive, Suite 100 • Eagle, Idaho 83616 - P 208.939.4041, F 208.939.4445 • www.thelandgroupinc.com — — _ HIGHKAY 20-26(CHINDEN BLVD) NW COR SEC 30 I I -.k 481 I I I ii p z I � L13 _ a mVLu� L15 a vs Lu r l o PARCEL A I I m N i r PER ROS#10478 I I i Lu = Q Lu �I I I IJ I WLU Lu t/) ti I ---- PARCEL B PER ROS#10478 \\- I SEWER EASEMENT I L2ITIE LINE) D Li (TIE LINE) `- NORTHERLY LINE HACIENDA SUB, W 1/4 GOR SEC 30 5.25 S.30- Sewer .30- Sewer Easement zar 4? xauzaRuscuf: r=2oa R ,� .r a ••• 03/20/2017 NOTE; LINE TABLE, SEE SHEET 2. Slgl M: 1 OF 2 ICS _L6_ O I!i i LAI I L22 PARCEL B PER ROS#10478 \\- I SEWER EASEMENT I L2ITIE LINE) D Li (TIE LINE) `- NORTHERLY LINE HACIENDA SUB, W 1/4 GOR SEC 30 5.25 S.30- Sewer .30- Sewer Easement zar 4? xauzaRuscuf: r=2oa R ,� .r a ••• 03/20/2017 NOTE; LINE TABLE, SEE SHEET 2. Slgl M: 1 OF 2 Line Table LINE BEARING LENGTH Line Table BEARING LENGTH Li SII9°52'46"E 48,00' L13 S89°33'36"E 298.73' L14 S00°28'36"W 20.00' L15 N89°33'36'W 298,71' Lib 800°25'16"W 276,70' L17 L2 N00'25'09114,23' L18 N89°33'36"W 385.77' L19 J L3 N00°25'09"E 20.49' 116.11' L21 6"E O1-� _ = LiJ L4 N77°51'53"E 44.13' C* L5 N00°25'03"E 187,78' UJ m=a L6 NII3°52'47"E 124.72' W a L7 N34°21'18"E 98.91' Z Lu W C3 LB 889°33'36"E 394.23' ••• W h y L9 N77°5741 "E 121.14' y L10 N00°25'1 s F f W UM LAND GROUP �aawm �'TMsi"°/hA� OF \0 ANN ,�: lip') T L. KA7� 03/20/2017 tmh1 K. RC Sewer Easement ° 2OF2 Line Table LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH Li SII9°52'46"E 48,00' L13 S89°33'36"E 298.73' L14 S00°28'36"W 20.00' L15 N89°33'36'W 298,71' Lib 800°25'16"W 276,70' L17 877°57'41"W 139,39' L18 N89°33'36"W 385.77' L19 S34°21'18"W 97.48' L20 S83°52'47'W 116.11' L21 6"E 332,38' L22 S77°51'53'W 64.62' L12 S00°25'16'W 51.75' L13 S89°33'36"E 298.73' L14 S00°28'36"W 20.00' L15 N89°33'36'W 298,71' Lib 800°25'16"W 276,70' L17 877°57'41"W 139,39' L18 N89°33'36"W 385.77' L19 S34°21'18"W 97.48' L20 S83°52'47'W 116.11' L21 800°25'03'W 185.97' Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM TITLE: St. Ignatius Water Easement ITEM NUMBER: 5 PROJECT NUMBER: MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035131 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=7 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/21/2017 01:51 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE WATER. MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, Ji made this day of A Pi` , 20 /7 between 644n Catholic i6NV of UiS-1 , the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the GRANTORS, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the GRANTEE; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the GRANTORS desire to provide a water main right -of --way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others, and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently connect to said pipeline from time to time by the GRANTEE; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the GRANTORS, and other good and valuable consideration, the GRANTORS do hereby give, grant and convey unto the GRANTEE the right-of-way for an easement over and across the following described property; (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair; replacement and subsequent connection at the convenience of the GRANTEE, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said GRANTEE, it's successors and assigns forever, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties her cto, that after malting repairs, performing maintenance, replacements or subsequent connections to the water mains, GRANTEE shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such procedures, However, GRANTEE shall not be responsible for repairing; replacing orrestoring anythingplaced within the area described in this casement that was placed there in violation of this casement, Water Main Easement REV, 08/15/16,doc THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the GRANTEE that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a pant thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the GRANTEE that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Secretary 0 — Address STATE OF IDAHO ) . ss. County of Ada ) On this 2-L--L'—day of , 20 / I , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared &u. perm;1,42455rnuA, dG and , known or identified to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day an�0eayefigtt above written. ®® NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at: Commission Expires: Water`xa's°p'°°ei®Q�',®°®® REV. 08/15/16.doc ®'p.. aA0&0000 ```®® GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy de erd, Mayor Attest 4 C.Ja oles, City Clerk Approved By City Council On; � l )017 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss County of Ada ) *7 r'+ (IfY"r w IDAHD SEAL On this . / day of . , 20 ,L�—, before me) the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said Sia e, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and CJay Coles, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written, (SEAT.) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHQ wee Residing at: A" ®Q d� Commission Expires: - 0 ;?D 2h *OTARP d0040 PUBt<�Ci Water Main Easement REV, 08/15/16,doe March 20, 2017 Project No. 115210 TEIR L,&Nn GROU10, XNC. Exhibit "A" St. Ignatius School WATER EASEMENT DESCRIPTION That portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest Section Corner of said Section 30, marked by a brass cap monument; thence along the west section line of said Section 30, South 00°25'09" West, 1069.50 feet, to a point, from which the West One Quarter Corner of said Section 30 bears, South 00°25'09" West, 1591.61 feet; thence leaving said west section line, South 89°52'46" East, 48.00 feet to a point on the easterly right -of -Way line of North Meridian Road; thence along said right-of-way line, North 00°25'09" East, 250.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence, continuing along said right-of-way line, North 00° 25' 09" East, 20.00 feet; Thence, leaving said right-of-way line, South 89° 34'51" East, 120.03 feet; Thence, North 00° 25'09" East, 9.00 feet; Thence, South 89° 36' 27" East, 20.00 feet; Thence, South 00° 25'09" West, 9.01 feet; Thence, South 89' 34'51" East, 0.36 feet; Thence, North 79° 21' 18" East, 146.56 feet; Thence, South 89° 34'54" East, 251.00 feet; Thence, South 00° 26'24" West, 45.56 feet; Thence, North 89° 33'36" West, 28.77 feet; Thence, North 000 26'45" East, 25.55 feet; Thence, North 89° 34'54" West, 220.29 feet; Thence, South 79° 21'18" West, 146.56 feet; Thence, North 89° 34'51" West, 142.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 0.268 acres or 11,674 square feet, more or less. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northwest Section Corner of said Section 30, marked by a brass cap monument; thence along the west section line of said Section 30, South 00°25'09" West, 1069,50 feet, to a point, from which the West One Quarter Corner of said Section 30 bears, South 00°25'09" West, 1591.61 feet; thence leaving said west section line, South 89°52'46" East, 235.01 feet to a point on the south line of Parcel B as shown on Record of Survey No. 10478, Ada County Records, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Site Planning • Landscape Architecture • Civil Engineering • Golf Course Irrigation & Engineering • Graphic Design • Surveying 462 E, Shore Drive, Suite 100 4 Eagle, Idaho 83616 • P 208,939.4041 • www.thelandgroupinc.com St. Ignatius School Water Easement Description Page 12 of 2 Thence, North 00° 08'36" West, 41.99 feet; Thence, South 89" 52'48" East, 25.42 feet; Thence, North 00° 17'49" East, 22.68 feet; Thence, South 89' 42' 11" East, 20.00 feet; Thence, South 00° 17'49" West, 22.62 feet; Thence, South 89° 52'48" East, 341.49 feet; Thence, South 00° 27'51" West, 30,06 feet; Thence, North 89° 32'09" West, 20.00 feet; Thence, North 000 27' 51" East, 9.94 feet; Thence, North 89° 52'48" West, 346.70 feet; Thence, South 000 08' 36" East, 21,99 feet to the south line of said Parcel B; Thence, along said south line, North 89° 52'46" West, 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 0.203 acres or 8,829 square feet, more or less. PREPARED BY; THE LAND GROUP, INC. Robert L. Kazarinoff, PLS. 1 03/20/2017 Site Planning : Landscape Architecture Clvil Engineering � Golf Course Irrigation & Engineering , Graphic Design • Surveying 462.E. Shore Drive, Suite 100 . Eagle, Idaho 8361:6 - P 2Q8193M041, F 208:.939.4445- www.thelandgroupinc,com { 1 -------------------------------- HIGHWAY 20-26(GHINDEN BLVD) I — NW COR SEC 30 ( PARCEL A I I ( — — PER ROS#10478 — — I ( I L4— L5 L6 l l -a------- 9 ----- ^�_ a r i o- — -- &.-- '14 — s — —L13 — � W I L15 L11 N oi I POINT OF BEGINNING (1) o I r PARCEL B I PER ROS#10478 o WATER EASEMENT I INE z L18 _L19� o I tiq^ o I� �^�------L21_�-------� I �--e...--.--• 725 ------L24�3- - ~ S89°5246°E 235.01' L27 { (TIE LINE) �L POINT OF NORTHERLY LINE HACIENDA SUB. BEGINNING (2) 03/20/2017 T W 1/4 COR SEC 30 NOTE: LINE TABLE, SEE SHEET 2. S.25 � _ 'FS_,30 0 00 x0 Water Easement xORIZMALSCAlE r=tar ..a O � = W 0°yw C0 = Q LU W WZ F C`3 4 F= C4 UM IAND GROUP ,.M, 1 OF 2 Water LINE BEARING LENGTH ti°�A D SG �� O W �o OF T L, ICAZA 03/20/2017 ' S89°52'46"E a J O �.. O Z = W G0 y UJ W Co = W Z LL W (J a }: COD r= L17 Line Table 25,42' L18 N00°17'49"E 22.68' L19 S89'42'1 1"E 20.00' L2 N00°25'09°E 20,00' L3 S89°34'51"E 120.03' L4 N00°25'09"E 9.00' L5 S89°36'27"E 20.00' L6 500°25'09'1N 9.01' L7 S89°34'51"E 0,36' L8 N79°21'18"E 146,56' L9 S89°34'b4"E 251.00' L10 S00°26'24'NJ 45.56' L11 N89°33'36'W 28.77' L12 N00°26'45"E 25.55' i' TfW LAM GROUP K f0!lIA �IOR�NJ.41( L13 N89°34'54'W 220,29' L4 [L1 S79'21'1 8'W 146,56' 15 N89°34'51' Easement 0&dkiusc WWI cmrf ax 2OF2 Line Table LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH Li S89°52'46"E 48,00' L17 589°52'48"E 25,42' L18 N00°17'49"E 22.68' L19 S89'42'1 1"E 20.00' L20 S00°17'49'W 22,62' L21 S89°52'48"E 341.49' L22 S00°27'51'W 30.06' L23 NII9°32'09'NJ 20.00' L24 N00°27'51 "E 9,94' L25 N89°52'4II'NJ 346,70' L26 S00°08'36"E 21,99' L27 N89°52'46'W 20.00' W 142.33' L16 N00°08'36"W 41.99' L17 589°52'48"E 25,42' L18 N00°17'49"E 22.68' L19 S89'42'1 1"E 20.00' L20 S00°17'49'W 22,62' L21 S89°52'48"E 341.49' L22 S00°27'51'W 30.06' L23 NII9°32'09'NJ 20.00' L24 N00°27'51 "E 9,94' L25 N89°52'4II'NJ 346,70' L26 S00°08'36"E 21,99' L27 N89°52'46'W 20.00' Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5AA PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Verado No. 1 Sanitary Sewer Easement MEETING NOTES c✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035136 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/21/2017 01:54 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this 1e day of &r 2O�I between C. � -'� L- L, (-,. ) the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second pant, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipeline from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of a sewer line over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a sanitary sewer line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area Sewer Main Easement REV. 08/15/16 described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: 1 1 anu �nS M2n,be� �prst Zp 83 >o b ress STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) On this 21 day of " M&Y c.L , 2011 'before me, the undersigned, a Notary Pub4c in and for said State, personally appeared m e V-4 o-/' andmA A,,,- r LA -&r-1, known or identified to me to be the Presidenrand �IcMbt% �A&L411r .Seeretafy, respectively, of the zarpopatn�hat executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such..Qo -pu ei i executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. (SEALY oT n R i. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO * pResiding at: 301u— • ., U 13 •: • • .�°; Commission Expires: 8 ( Zo Sewer Main Easern6%�`�TF OC �� `�,• REV. 08/15/16 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN .G� Tammy de erd, Mayor Atte by C.JaVColes, City Clerk P�Ep AUGUST z 0%v of W Approved By City Council On:LI ! f , STATE OF IDAHO ss County of Ada On this �SI-1 day of , 20�, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, pe sonally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and C.JAY COLES known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. 140'ARY PUBLIC FOR ID�HO Nit Y (SEAL) Residing at:Q1ti�•-� Commission Expires: D _ d E Sewer Main Easement REV. 08/15/16 Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC t' fr P: (208) 398-8104 F: (208) 398-8105 2030 5. Wa5hmgton Ave., Emmett, ID 83G 17 EXHIBIT A March 6, 2017 Verado Subdivision No. 1 City of Meridian Sewer Easement Basis of Bearings for this legal description is South 89044'57" East between the brass cap marking the northwest corner of Section 5 and the brass cap marking the N1/4 of Section 5. A parcel of land located in Government Lot 3, of Section 5, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at a found brass cap marking the N1/4 corner of Section 5; Thence South 0127'25" West, coincident with the easterly line of said Government Lot 3, of Section 5, a distance of 50.00 feet to the southerly right of way of E. Ustick Road; Thence North 89144'57" West, coincident with said southerly right of way of E. Ustick Road, 335.00 feet; Thence South 0127'25" West, parallel with said easterly line of Government Lot 3, of Section 5, a distance of 825.24 feet to the northeast corner of Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2, as shown on file in Book 85 of Plats, at Page 9502, Ada County Records; Thence North 86°09'31" West, coincident with the northerly line of said Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2, a distance of 153.77 feet; Thence North 76001'02" West, coincident with said northerly line of Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2, a distance of 191.51 feet; Thence North 30042'17" West, coincident with said northerly line of Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2, a distance of 189.26 feet; Thence North 58118'33" West, coincident with said northerly line of Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2, a distance of 99.33 feet; Thence North 86015'15" West, coincident with said northerly line of Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2, a distance of 133.83 feet (formerly 133.76 feet) to the northwest corner of said Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2; Thence South 0027'32" West, coincident with the westerly line of said Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2, a distance of 565.95 feet; Thence North 89132'13" West, 19.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; P:\2016\16225-VERADO SUB\Survey\Drawings\Descriptions\16027 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER EASEMENT.docx Page (1 Thence South 0127'47" West, 5.00 feet; Thence North 89132'13" West, 296.79 feet; Thence North 0027'47" East, 20.00 feet; Thence South 89132'13" East, 296.79 feet; Thence South 0027'47" West, 15.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 0.14 acres more or less. N s� End Description OF P0R j PA2016\16225-VERADO SUB\Survey\Drawings\Descriptions\16027 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER EASEMENT.docx Page 12 EXHIBIT B ° N. LOCUST GROVE m �# \ � N ; � § ( r § kp %Q1500,/ /2- / �m _* w» . �\2 \ } \q$ ` a tea\ $ § ®_\\ o � \ \ \ § 14 o e ^ \ ^` 82524'— /-Ro co co k� ) 0 om�o -53. 2 co b \ GG%2 klg k ^®/ ljo 2 n _$ \ I % o ® sow! 0 m & o ® q \ § % 2 mom, ) # Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5BB PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approve Finance Department to Pay Vendor Payments of $956,198.16 MEETING NOTES 9 APPROIED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ABOUT THE KIDS, INC.instructor fee - Learn to Love Lacrosse 2/27-3/20/17 x 9 259.20 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DR16-6653, 15% of $728.00 in Seized Cash, CR# 29736 4/5/17 109.20 01 General Fund AMY MERRILL instructor fee-Ballet,HipHop,Lyrical,Jazz 3/2-3/23/17 x 55 1,428.00 01 General Fund ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS Per Diem, A. Roberts, Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce Leader 127.50 01 General Fund AUTO TRIM DESIGN WEST IDAHO 220/Tint windows on MF042 and MF043 200.00 01 General Fund AUTOMATIC RAIN CO DBA HORIZON tree trimming tools for Storey Park - qty 4 71.23 01 General Fund BME FIRE FIGHTER SUPPLY, LLC.220/Station boots for Luke Smillie 135.15 01 General Fund BOISE METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERC Registration, T. DeWeerd, G. Milam, R. Simison, J. Borton, C 1,745.00 01 General Fund BONNEVILLE BLUE PRINT SUPPLY FiveMile Creek Path Segment H2 Badley to Fairview CDs x 180 32.40 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC.220/Shop supplies, truck wash, St. 4 60.00 01 General Fund BRANDON MEDICA Reimburse, B. Medica, Education Assist, CWI, Fire Service Te 417.00 01 General Fund BRENDA SHERWOOD Per Diem, B. Sherwood, Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce Leade 127.50 01 General Fund BRIGHT IDEAS LIGHTING COMPANY Homecourt Bay 5 light switch replacement 51.75 01 General Fund BROWN BUS COMPANY Spring Break Day Camp busing to Meridian Bowl 3/28/17 192.25 01 General Fund BROWN BUS COMPANY Spring Break Day Camp busing to Wings Ctr 3/31/17 306.25 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil & Filter Change for Ford Fusion, Vin# 318723, Lic#C18641 24.94 01 General Fund CAMPBELL SCIENTIFIC INC Network Attachment for Weather Station 417.44 01 General Fund CHELSEA R CUNNINGHAM instructor fee - Kids Yoga 2/25-3/25/17 - qty 7 276.00 01 General Fund CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS CARD SERVICES #7898226373, Pay City Fuel March 2017 12,238.63 01 General Fund CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS CARD SERVICES #7898226399, Pay PD Fuel March 2017 12,504.57 01 General Fund CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY Ointment and eye wash for med cabinet in break area 49.49 01 General Fund CITY OF BOISE 2017 Contribution for Allumbaugh, April - June 2017 14,365.00 01 General Fund CITY OF BOISE ATTORNEYS OFFICE 17-0013, City Prosecutor/Criminal Legal Services April 2017 29,102.42 01 General Fund CLOG BUSTERS unplug ladies restroom toilet at Tully Park 198.00 01 General Fund CLOVERDALE NURSERY plants for Settlers Park - qty 8 179.20 01 General Fund CLOVERDALE NURSERY topsoil for Settlers Park - qty 4 yards 72.00 01 General Fund COMPOST WEST, INC compost for Settlers & Storey Parks - qty 70 1,330.00 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 1 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund CRAIG HOOD Per Diem, C. Hood, Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce Leadershi 127.50 01 General Fund DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO Delta Dental, April 2017, #0133-0000 23,651.57 01 General Fund DTG MAPS Map Books for Patrol & Code Enf. - Qty 4 88.70 01 General Fund E C POWER SYSTEMS 220/Repair generator at St. 3 372.89 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO lamps for exterior lights for Renaissance Park - qty 6 36.08 01 General Fund ENHANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS security camera upgrades to monitor Kleiner bollards 1,719.30 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Build New Fleet Unit #157, Build & Misc Equip 3,406.00 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Build New Fleet Unit #159, Labor & Misc Equip 3,441.16 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Build New Fleet Unit #526 2,401.74 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Front Grill Lights Replaced for Unit #28 343.00 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Labor to Continue Troubleshooting Radio for Unit #48 74.00 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Push Bumper Brackets for Unit #121 156.98 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Radio Troubleshooting & Spotlight Repair for Unit #48 618.00 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Replace Siren Speaker Unit #131 372.00 01 General Fund EXPRESS PLUMBING SERVICES, INC.220/Troubleshoot water fountain leak at St. 1 88.00 01 General Fund FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION steel for end ramp on deck over trailer, Lic# A15214 - qty 9 329.02 01 General Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.copper repair parts for Settlers plumbing - qty 6 37.27 01 General Fund FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE 220/5 subscriptions to FireHouse Magazine, 3-1-17 to 3-1-18 125.00 01 General Fund FLORAL CREATIONS & GIFTS, LLC.Refreshed Silk Flower Arrangement for State of the City, 2/8 30.00 01 General Fund FORGE Instructor fee - Shoshin Ryu for Beginners 3/4-3/25/17 x 5 140.00 01 General Fund GENESIS MILAM Per Diem, G. Milam, Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce Leadersh 127.50 01 General Fund GLENN WILSON Per Diem, G. Wilson, FDIC Convention, Indianapolis IN, 4/23/ 297.00 01 General Fund GYM OUTFITTERS Repair Pulley on Gym Equipment / PD 75.00 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY irrigation part for Bear Creek Park - qty 1 1.83 01 General Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY irrigation parts for Bear Creek Park - qty 3 4.99 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 2 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Interior Wall Repair MADC Trailer Unit #4 16.44 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Push Brooms and measure Wheels for Patrol Cars - Qty 16 334.94 01 General Fund HSBC (COSTCO) BUSINESS SERVICE #7003-7319-1000-5018, Costco, March 2017 1,238.50 01 General Fund I.C.R.M.P.ICRMP Insurance Premium, 10/1/16-9/30/17, 2nd Payment 109,881.37 01 General Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES business cards for T.Ricks, S.Zahorka & B.Sherwood 138.75 01 General Fund IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY 17-0012, Animal Control Services April 2017 30,844.33 01 General Fund IDAHO NURSERY ASSOCIATION 2017-2018 INLA membership dues for MPR Department 75.00 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2200136188, Parks Power March 2017 11,777.95 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER ID Power - Fire Department March 2017 2,153.05 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE Access Fee County or Municipal ILETS April-June 2017 3,125.00 01 General Fund IDAHO STATE POLICE Fingerprinting & Background Checks - March 2017 512.50 01 General Fund IDALOHA INC Homecourt curtain divider repairs 1,596.48 01 General Fund INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR, INC.OtterBox Defender Series iPad Pro 9.7 Protective Case for Ta 48.00 01 General Fund INT'L CODE COUNCIL 2015 IBC illustrated Handbook for B. Bjornson 109.00 01 General Fund INT'L CODE COUNCIL 2015 IBC soft/tabs combo for B. Bjornson 101.00 01 General Fund JOE BORTON Per Diem, J. Borton, Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce Leaders 127.50 01 General Fund JOHNSTONE SUPPLY HVAC unit belts - qty 5 62.20 01 General Fund KATHERINE RIGGS instructor fee - Hot Hula Fitness 3/2-3/23/17 - qty 5 128.00 01 General Fund KRISTIAN FORBEY Per Diem, K. Forbey, FDIC Convention, Indianapolis IN, 4/23/ 297.00 01 General Fund LITHIA FORD LINCOLN OF BOISE Add Keyless Entry to Unit #157 129.74 01 General Fund LOWE'S fittings for Ten Mile pump station - qty 2 8.33 01 General Fund MASTERCARD MC Pay City #7, #0999, 3/27/17 Statement -158.00 01 General Fund MCMULLEN LATERAL WATER USERS ASSOCIATION 2017 ditch maint,repairs,improvements-Keith Bird Legacy Park 108.56 01 General Fund MERIDIAN CHAMBER of COMMERCE Meridian Chamber Luncheon 4/4/17 for S Houston 15.00 01 General Fund MERIDIAN CYCLES Tune up/Maintenance 5 Bikes, Brake Repairs 358.85 01 General Fund MOORE & ELIA, LLP Courthouse matter, 2/3/17-2/22/17 1,350.00 01 General Fund MOTIONS DANCE STUDIO instructor fee-Cheer,Ballet,Tap,Jazz,Tumble 2/15-3/24/17 2,748.00 01 General Fund MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SVCS 220/Shipping for alterations to turnouts 11.79 01 General Fund NORCO cylinder rental for welding gas - March 2017 42.16 01 General Fund NORCO grinding discs for Lanark Parks Shop - qty 80 142.12 01 General Fund NORCO nozzle insulator for welder - qty 2 5.56 01 General Fund NORCO welding & torch gases for Lanark Parks Shop - Qty 3 139.38 01 General Fund NORTH SLOUGH WATER USERS Keith Bird Legacy Park 2017 water use assessment 32.32 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 3 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.copy paper, pencils, printer toner - qty 1 83.92 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Keyboard, Ergo, 4000, NATU 283736 (30.93) 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.office supplies-post-it flags/arrows and post cards - qty 7 43.35 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.paper, batteries, post-it notes - Qty 3 46.18 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.USB drives - Qty 3 16.71 01 General Fund OXARC, INC.220/Medical Oxygen - Qty 2 16.30 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 10 77.27 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for fleet truck 8 75.60 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for Ford Explorer 19.19 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for truck 11 & Storey equipment 51.15 01 General Fund PAUL'S MERIDIAN STINKER unleaded fuel for truck 4; diesel for equipment 46.78 01 General Fund QUEST SOFTWARE INC Vranger Backup & Replication Per CPU Maintenance Renewal 3,061.00 01 General Fund REPCO MARKETING, INC.Mouth Pieces for Breath Alcohol Testing - Qty 300 122.50 01 General Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT POSTAGE USE, March 2017 1,140.73 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86084920, Copier Lease 4/17 & Additional Copies 3/17 579.87 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86121202, PSTC Copier Lease 4/17 & Additional Copies 3/17 127.32 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86172112, Records Copier Additional Copies, Mar 2017 192.17 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86172157, CID Copier Additional Copies - March 2017 1,010.71 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86172509, Code Copier Additional Copies, Mar 2017 30.74 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86173707, 200-3151516-100 4/17 lease + addtl pages 3/17 599.49 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC C86173707, 200-3151516-100 copier lease - 3/1/17-3/31/17 361.41 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC Printer Cartridge for Records 41.00 01 General Fund ROBERT SIMISON Per Diem, R. Simison, Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce Leader 127.50 01 General Fund SAFETEC COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS SafeTec Essentials Upload Fee-up to 500 documents, SafeTec E 1,245.00 01 General Fund SHANNON MEYER, PHD CIT Training Class, Tactical Communication for Law Enforceme 833.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC fleet truck 31 vehicle lettering 145.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Graphics for New Motorcycle Unit # 526 125.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Mayor's Walking Club Buttons - Qty 7,500 1,600.00 01 General Fund STORMWIND STUDIOS Project Management All Access Classes, K. Vigil, Online,1,990.00 01 General Fund SYRINGA NETWORKS, LLC 17-0020 Dark Fiber 4 Strands 1,150.00 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 4 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund SYRINGA NETWORKS, LLC Ethernet B/W(100MB) Internet B/W(100MB)800.00 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP 220/Add name & rank & logo to furnished stock 102.00 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP 6 embroidered t-shirts for client meeting 110.00 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP New Hire Employee Uniform - C. Schaefer 101.00 01 General Fund TAMMY DEWEERD Mayor Cellphone Reimbursement FY17 - April 2017 100.00 01 General Fund TAMMY DEWEERD Per Diem, T. DeWeerd, Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce Leader 127.50 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)hot saw rental for Tully water line repair 3/24/17 55.00 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)Kleiner backpack blower repairs 43.32 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)Kleiner Park hedge trimmer repair 161.97 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)pump rental for Generations Plaza water feature 4/3-4/5/17 131.00 01 General Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)Tully Park Echo trimmer repair 58.09 01 General Fund TERRA ENVIRO CONSULTING, INC.soils testing-BarkPark,Renaissance,Seasons,10MileIntercha... 1,032.50 01 General Fund THE CAR PARK Court Parking for Pd March 2017 92.00 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Postage to send Defective Body Camera for Replacement 15.31 01 General Fund TOTAL SYSTEMS SVCS, INC.HVAC unit power troubleshooting at Homecourt 123.00 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE Coffee, Hot Chocolate, Cream, Sugar, Cups & Cooler Rental 322.50 01 General Fund TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE Coffee. Hot chocolate, Cream, Sugar, Cups & Cooler Rental 341.60 01 General Fund TWO OCEAN PRINT 2017 men's basketball champion shirts - qty 50 316.20 01 General Fund TWO OCEAN PRINT 2017 volleyball champion shirts - qty 94 742.00 01 General Fund UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 17-0009, UPRR - South Parking Lot Lease, April 2017 1,692.63 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001, April 2017 Premiums 13,024.76 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE United Heritage, Voluntary Insurance, April 2017 4,191.57 01 General Fund USSSOA basketball officiating 4/3-4/7/17 - qty 9 games 472.59 01 General Fund USSSOA volleyball officiating 4/3-4/7/17 - qty 40 games 872.64 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00001 Data FY2017, 2/21/17-3/20/17 1,346.30 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00002 Cellphones 2017 - 2/21/17-3/20/17 7,658.55 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00003 FY2017 - 2/21/17-3/20/17 37.54 01 General Fund VISION SERVICE PLAN 30 044489 0001, VSP April 2017 4,619.30 01 General Fund VLCM 17-0101 Council Complex Installed Equipment 134,491.14 01 General Fund WILLAMETTE DENTAL OF IDAHO, INC Willamette Dental Insurance April 2017 5,059.75 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 5 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount Total 01 General Fund 475,071.19 07 Impact Fund SONNTAG RECREATION INC gaming tables for Keith Bird Legacy Park - qty 2 2,823.00 07 Impact Fund THE LAND GROUP, INC.16-0186 prof svcs Keith Bird Legacy Park master plan 02/2017 817.50 Total 07 Impact Fund 3,640.50 20 Grant Fund governmental JOHNNY INK MADC Natural High Graphic Design for Posters & Billboard 990.00 20 Grant Fund governmental MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES 17-0263, Service Thru 2/28/17 1,675.50 20 Grant Fund governmental RESERVE ACCOUNT POSTAGE USE, March 2017 2.45 20 Grant Fund governmental TREASURE VALLEY LITHO Print MADC Natural High Poster: Positive Social Norm Environ 540.00 Total 20 Grant Fund governmental 3,207.95 60 Enterprise Fund ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC 17-0183, service period 3/25/17 375.00 60 Enterprise Fund AVAYA, INC.Avaya Quarterly Maintenance Service Agreements-Hardware 236.91 60 Enterprise Fund BHS SPECIALTY CHEMICALS 17-0142 Ferric Chloride 7,311.00 60 Enterprise Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 17-0123, IVR Processing - March 2017 862.25 60 Enterprise Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 17-0124, Lockbox Processing - March 2017 1,659.78 60 Enterprise Fund BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY Project Management Program for K. Buttars & K. Jones, 3 of 4 1,100.00 60 Enterprise Fund BRANOM INSTRUMENTS Labor & supplies for annual calibration of gas detectors & 1,843.00 60 Enterprise Fund BRANOM INSTRUMENTS Thermocouple assy w/ in-head transmitter 274.92 60 Enterprise Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Vehicle Maintenance 859.20 60 Enterprise Fund COLE INDUSTRIAL, INC.Labor for annual inspection & testing on boiler 4, digester 1,300.00 60 Enterprise Fund COLE INDUSTRIAL, INC.Labor for annual testing & inspection on boiler 3, digester 1,300.00 60 Enterprise Fund COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Project 10050, Ethernet Comm Module - Qty 2 received 3/14/17 1,113.60 60 Enterprise Fund CUSTOM ELECTRIC INC Install of Sensors @ Well 20 3,442.00 60 Enterprise Fund CUSTOM ELECTRIC INC Installation of Door Alarm @ Victory Booster Station 307.99 60 Enterprise Fund DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF IDAHO Delta Dental, April 2017, #0133-0000 6,261.08 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 6 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund DOUGLAS DEPOISTER Refund, 1521271406, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2511 N Stone Pl, Customer 91.71 60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Addtional items needed for cradlepoint install on CCTV Van 1 115.00 60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Emergency lights & window tint for PW vehicle, Lic# C19993 1,356.09 60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Installation of Light Bars on Vehicles 6,895.00 60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Labor & parts to install cradlepoint & antenna on camel 696.00 60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Labor & supplies to install cradlepoint & antenna on CCTV 622.00 60 Enterprise Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. Laor & parts to install cradlepoint & antenna on CCTV Van 2 663.00 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.17-0066, Water Meters - Qty 27 5,118.12 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Credit for Return (54.10) 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Line Wat/Sewer Repair 174.84 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Line Wat/Sewer Repair Materials 411.34 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Line Wat/Sewer Repair Supplies 3,137.04 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Part to install 6 inch decant valve on debris tank-vactor 224.99 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Bacti sampling bottles 195.98 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Conc. acid bottle tip dispenser 461.62 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Interference tests for WAD CN 61.99 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Trace metals sampling containers (FEP) & supplies 771.77 60 Enterprise Fund FORSGREN ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0230, service through 3/25/17 2,258.75 60 Enterprise Fund GEM STATE COMMUNICATIONS INC Equipment Radio Parts 253.00 60 Enterprise Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Freight Charge 35.00 60 Enterprise Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Line Wat/Sewer Repair Materials 800.00 60 Enterprise Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Wat line/Sewer Supplies 478.46 60 Enterprise Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Wat/Sewer Line Repair Supplies 306.25 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Ammonia TNT tubes 345.59 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Credit for change in service contract for LDO's-LD02 (737.48) 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Credit for change in service contract for LDO's-LDO1V (621.66) 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Trace metals sampling pump heads & connections 7,961.03 60 Enterprise Fund HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS Bainbridge PRV Materials 592.71 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Lab cleaning & shopping supplies plus tube cutter &81.76 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES paint & brushes for collections bldg 16.43 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Paint & supplies; PVC pipe & shower faucet for Collections 165.94 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Parts to plumb in sink at N. Black Cat lift station 33.38 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 7 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Parts to repair plumbing in Collections bldg for plumbing 78.04 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Returned tail piece & tube extension (5.25) 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Returned trap adapter (1.37) 60 Enterprise Fund HSBC (COSTCO) BUSINESS SERVICE #7003-7319-1000-5018, Costco, March 2017 59.94 60 Enterprise Fund I.C.R.M.P.ICRMP Insurance Premium, 10/1/16-9/30/17, 2nd Payment 36,627.13 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business cards for Dale Bolthouse 46.25 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business cards for Jason Korn 46.25 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2202131047, Wastewater Plant Power March 2017 40,345.92 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2204228288, Water Power March 2017 25,989.61 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO POWER 2205167097 WWTP Power - Liftstations March 2017 3,628.38 60 Enterprise Fund INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER Battery for emergency exit signs in Reuse booster station & 106.30 60 Enterprise Fund INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER New battery for maintenance truck C9465 134.75 60 Enterprise Fund JARED & HAYLIE BIGGS Refund, 0470150202, Wat/Sew/Trash, 5532 N Fox Run Way, Custo 62.91 60 Enterprise Fund JESSE URZUA Reimbursement, J. Urzua, IBOL Idaho Water Distribution Class 87.00 60 Enterprise Fund JOHNSTONE SUPPLY HVAC Belt 8.22 60 Enterprise Fund KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES Sure flex sleeve, size 5J 16.40 60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018 QLPE Svcs 1/1/17-2/28/17 Verado#1-5 sheets 1,300.00 60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018 QLPE Svcs 2/1-28/17 Knightsbridge Sub, 3 sheets 780.00 60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018 QLPE Svcs 2/1-28/17 Silverstond Rdwy Ext-5 sheets 1,300.00 60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018 QLPE Svcs 2/1-28/17 Swomdell Sub-2 sheets 520.00 60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0018 QLPE Svs 10/1/16 - 2/28/17 Biltmore#3 3 sheets 780.00 60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.17-0177, Service 2/1/17-2/28/17 - Final Invoice 3,636.65 60 Enterprise Fund LITHIA FORD LINCOLN OF BOISE Refund of sales tax (1.64) 60 Enterprise Fund LITHIA FORD LINCOLN OF BOISE Warranty & oil change on CCTV Van 2 C19267 41.59 60 Enterprise Fund LOWE'S Supplies 63.67 60 Enterprise Fund MASTER ROOTER PLUMBING Pumping septic tank service 3/24/17, 10716.a 295.00 60 Enterprise Fund MASTER ROOTER PLUMBING Septic Pump and dump, service 4/7/17 295.00 60 Enterprise Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Equipment/Supplies 33.01 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Teflon tape for chemical feed pipe repair 5.24 60 Enterprise Fund MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES 17-0052, service through 2/28/17 4,404.50 60 Enterprise Fund MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES 17-0091, service through 2/28/17 11,420.38 60 Enterprise Fund MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES 17-0173, service through 2/28/17 1,230.50 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 8 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS Heavy duty FHP belt 20.50 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Cylinder rental for March 2017 - Qty 8 61.44 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Dilution for eye wash stations 109.84 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Torch repair 92.30 60 Enterprise Fund NORCO Welding supplies 24.79 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC Refund, 1198000101, Sewer Adjustment, 3377 N Ten Mile Rd, On 5,265.86 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Office Supplies 116.13 60 Enterprise Fund OXARC, INC.360Gl Tank 2,646.83 60 Enterprise Fund POST DRILLING 17-0168, service 2/15/17-3/29/17 192,105.00 60 Enterprise Fund RAPID AERIAL LLC Stitched aerial photo of WRRF 125.00 60 Enterprise Fund RESERVE ACCOUNT POSTAGE USE, March 2017 312.92 60 Enterprise Fund RICOH USA, INC C86101421 Envir. copier lease April 2017, copies March 2017 365.56 60 Enterprise Fund RICOH USA, INC C8610147 copier lease PW, April 2017, copies March 2017 360.82 60 Enterprise Fund SAMUEL M TALKINGTON Refund, 1626010203, Wat/Sew/Trash, 13 W Indian Rocks St, Own 34.94 60 Enterprise Fund SIGNS, ETC Labor to change number on Operations truck C14002 30.00 60 Enterprise Fund SIMPLEX GRINNELL Labor to clean smoke chamber and repair indicator on 537.60 60 Enterprise Fund SKILLPATH SEMINARS Star 12 Pass membership renewal for D Russell 249.00 60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC Elbow, 90 degree, 2 inch socket x socket 12.40 60 Enterprise Fund STAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC 17-0260, Lost Rapids Drive PRV Installation 9,923.00 60 Enterprise Fund SULLIVAN REBERGER 17-0008, Lobbying fees for March 2017 4,000.00 60 Enterprise Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)Lp gas for weed burner for weed destruction along canal 180.00 60 Enterprise Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)Returned replacement blade (10.99) 60 Enterprise Fund TELANSWER, INC After Hour Phone Service 4/1/17-4/31/17 173.00 60 Enterprise Fund TREASURE VALLEY COFFEE Project 10601, warter cooler Rental April 10.00 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001, April 2017 Premiums 3,600.38 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE United Heritage, Voluntary Insurance, April 2017 565.35 60 Enterprise Fund UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BOISE / UTILITY TRUCK EQUIPMENT 17-0254, Install of Tube Running Boards 2,000.00 60 Enterprise Fund UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BOISE / UTILITY TRUCK EQUIPMENT 17-0254, Truck Utility Box Install, Lic# C19983 9,975.00 60 Enterprise Fund UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BOISE / UTILITY TRUCK EQUIPMENT 17-0254, Utility Truck Box Install - Lic# C19969 9,975.00 60 Enterprise Fund UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BOISE / UTILITY TRUCK EQUIPMENT 17-0254, Utility Truck Box Install - Lic# C19982 9,975.00 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 9 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund UTILITY TRAILER SALES OF BOISE / UTILITY TRUCK EQUIPMENT 17-0254, Utility Truck Box Install, Lic# C19968 9,975.00 60 Enterprise Fund VALUE HEATING & AIR CONDITION Install & Check Mini Split System 4,582.00 60 Enterprise Fund VALUE HEATING & AIR CONDITION Install of Min Split System @ Well 11 4,582.00 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 272508216-00001 Water/WW Modems FY2017 - 2/24/17-3/23/17 10.44 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00001 Data FY2017, 2/21/17-3/20/17 983.10 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00002 Cellphones 2017 - 2/21/17-3/20/17 2,520.24 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00003 FY2017 - 2/21/17-3/20/17 182.34 60 Enterprise Fund VISION SERVICE PLAN 30 044489 0001, VSP April 2017 1,410.84 60 Enterprise Fund WILLAMETTE DENTAL OF IDAHO, INC Willamette Dental Insurance April 2017 2,342.75 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC coupling adapter 23.84 60 Enterprise Fund WW GRAINGER, INC Tracemetals sampling parts 56.11 60 Enterprise Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA MX4-741080, Copier Lease 2/17 & Additional Copies 2/17 280.53 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 474,278.52 Report Total 956,198.16 Date: 4/13/17 12:18:30 PM Page: 10 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5/CC PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0029 ITEM TITLE: Maddyn Subdivision Final Order for approval consisting of 39 single family residential lots and 9 common lots on approximately 10.32 acres in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts by A Team Land Consultants - w/side of N. Meridian Rd, s/o E. Ustick Road and n/o W. Sedgewick Drive MEETING NOTES WHO Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR Maddyn Village Subdivision (H-2017-0029) Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: APRIL 4, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF TWENTY-NINE (29) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOTS AND NINE (9) COMMON LOTS ON 10.32 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 AND R-15 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR MADDYN VILLAGE SUBDIVISION. BY: A TEAM CONSULTANTS APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2017-0029 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on APRIL 4, 2017 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING MADDYN VILLAGE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN THE GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2017, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 02/17/2017, GREGORY G. CARTER, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR Maddyn Village Subdivision (H-2017-0029) Page 2 of 3 PLS , SHEET 1 OF 4,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated April 4, 2017, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the #-14 , 2017. \�GOVpv2ATED A�cGs i Ci('tvuf o W Attest: m PlAly* S q L of ha TREASV�� C. Jay Coles City Clerk B Tammy d erd Mayor, Ci y of Meridian day of Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: �� \� C'o A� Dated: L/ / /I / D2/7 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR Maddyn Village Subdivision (H-2017-0029) Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: April 4, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Josh Beach, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2017-0029 – Maddyn Village Subdivision I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant has applied for a final plat (FP) consisting of twenty-nine (29) single family residential lots, ten multi-family lots and nine (9) common/other lots on approximately 10.32 acres of land in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Maddyn Village Subdivision final plat based on the analysis provided below in Section V. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval I move to approve File Number H-2017-0029 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial I move to deny File Number H-2017-0029, as presented during the hearing on April 4, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0029 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The site is located at 2975 and 3001 N. Meridian Road, in the NE ¼ of Section 1, Township 3N, Range 1W. B. Owners: Kyle Enzler 3001 N. Meridian Road Boise, ID 83646 EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 2 C. Applicant/Representative: Steve Arnold, A Team Consultants 1785 Whisper Cove Avenue Boise, ID 83709 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts twenty-nine -nine (29) single family residential lots, ten (10) multi- family lots and nine (9) common/other lots on approximately 10.32 acres of land in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts. All of the lots comply with the dimensional standards of the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts, except for Lot 32, Block 1. The approved preliminary plat, conditional use permit and the recorded development agreement allow the site to develop with twenty-seven (27) new single family detached dwelling units, forty-eight (48) multi-family units and maintain two (2) existing homes for an overall gross density of the development is 7.5 dwelling units per acre. Two of the proposed building lots, Lots 32 and 34, Block 1, are split-zoned R-8 and R-15. Staff recommends the applicant obtain approval of a rezone application prior to signature on the final plat to clean-up the zoning boundary. The recorded development agreement also requires the site to develop with 3.82 acres of open space. Open space requirements for the proposed subdivision include the development of Lots 1, 16, 23, 24, 39, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2. Amenities for these lots include a pool, clubhouse, community garden, sport court and a micropath. Except for aforementioned common lots (including the Meridian Road street buffers), the internal landscaping and the other site amenities will be reviewed for conformance with a future certificate of zoning compliance and administrative design review application for the multi-family portion of the development. The proposed open space is consistent with the amount approved with the preliminary plat. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The number of buildable lots and common area is the same as shown on the approved preliminary plat; therefore, staff finds the proposed final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat. VI. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation and preliminary plat (H-2016- 0075) and recorded development agreement (instrument #2017-003461) for this subdivision. 2. The applicant has until October 12, 2018 to obtain City Engineer’s signature on the final plat or apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. The final plat prepared by Idaho Survey Group, by Gregory G. Carter, dated 02/17/17, shall be revised as follows: a. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. b. For all common driveways, a perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. Unless limited by a significant geographical feature, or separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped common lot, all properties that abut a common driveway shall take access from the driveway. Add a 5-foot EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 3 wide landscape buffer on the north east side of the common drive proposed to be constructed on Lot 34, Block 1. c. Prior to signature on the final plat, the applicant shall provide an exhibit that shows the setbacks, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures that take access from a common lot (Lots 34 and 35, Block 1). d. Lot 19, Block 1 shall be for the benefit of cross access and shared parking for the proposed development, revise note #9 accordingly. e. Add a note: “The bottom elevation of all structural footings shall be set a minimum of 12 - inches above the highest established normal ground water elevation.” f. Note #1: Lot 33. Block 1 shall be included as a common lot. g. Add a note: “The development is subject to the Development Agreement #2017-003461. h. Lot 32, Block 1 shall have 40 feet of street frontage in accord with UDC Table 11-2A-6. 4. The landscape plan, prepared by Power Enterprises, dated 02/26/2017, is approved with the following comment: a. All fencing should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6B and 11-3A-7. Fencing adjacent to all interior pathways and common open space shall meet the requirements of UDC 11-3A-7. b. Additional parking for the proposed clubhouse and pool are shown on the landscape plan. The applicant shall provide documentation from ACHD indicating their approval of proposed parking on Lot 1, Block 2. c. Temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed at the subdivision boundary prior to release of building permits for this subdivision. d. All landscape improvements approved with the proposed subdivision must be installed prior to releasing occupancy for any homes constructed within the subdivision. 5. Prior to development of Lot 1, Block 2, the applicant shall receive certificate of zoning compliance and design review approval for the pool and clubhouse. 6. The developer shall either rezone the portion that does not match the actual zoning of the land or the developer shall modify the Final Plat map to match the appropriate zoning prior to City signature. 7. A certificate of zoning compliance and administrative design review approval is required for the multi-family portion of the development (Lots 18-31, Block 1) prior to issuance of any building permits. NOTE: A CZC application may include one or more multi-family units on a lot/parcel. 8. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. 9. Future homes constructed within the subdivision must comply with the elevations approved with the approved preliminary plat. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record a final plat. 11. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 12. The property owner shall coordinate with the City’s Addressing Specialist and obtain a new street addresses for the existing residences proposed on Lots 17 and 32, Block 1. EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 4 13. The existing structures on Lots 17 and 32, Block 1 shall comply with the dimensional standards in accord with UDC Table 11-2A-6. Any structure that does not conform to the required setbacks shall be removed or the applicant shall obtain approval of a variance application from the City Council. VII. ONGOING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 2. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 3. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 4. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11- 3A-3. 5. All common open space shall be maintained by an owner's association as set forth in UDC 11- 3G-3F1. VIII. PROCESS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. No signs are approved with this application. Prior to installing any signs on the property, the applicant shall submit a sign permit application consistent with the standards in UDC Chapter 3 Article D and receive approval for such signs. 2. The applicant shall complete all improvements related to public life, safety, and health as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. A surety agreement may be accepted for other improvements in accord with UDC 11-5C-3C. 3. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Division staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 4. The applicant shall pay any applicable impact fees prior to the issuance of a building permit. IX. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set fo rth in EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 5 UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 6 prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year -round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. X. EXHIIBITS A. Vicinity Map B. Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 07/24/2016) C. Proposed Final Plat (dated: 02/17/2017) D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 02/26/2017) EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 7 Exhibit A – Vicinity Map EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 8 Exhibit B – Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 07/24/2016) EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 9 Exhibit C – Proposed Final Plat (dated: 02/17/2017) EXHIBIT A Maddyn Village Subdivision H-2017-0029 PAGE 10 Exhibit D: Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 02/26/2017) Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 5/DD PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0027 ITEM TITLE: TM Crossing MDA Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law for approval C. Public Hearing for TM Crossing (H- 2017-0027) by Brighton Investments, et al., Located Northeast Corner of 1-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Approved - Request: Modification to the Development Agreement to Expand the Phase I Boundary MEETING NOTES 9 APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0027 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for a Modification to the Development Agreement to Modify the Phase I Boundary to Include Additional Area, by Brighton Investments et al. Case No(s). H-2017-0027 For the City Council Hearing Date of: April 4, 2017 (Findings on April 18, 2017) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0027 - 2 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for a modification to the development agreement is hereby approved per the Staff Report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the / day of AP +rl L 2017. COUNCIL PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD VOTED — COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED e COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED I COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM VOTED MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED (TIE BREAKER) �7 Mayor Tarin Weerd Attest: N jto 1 C. y Col mo ��°,�i� `' City Clerk / Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By:� Dated: ( V 2/7 City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0027 - 3 - EXHIBIT A TM Crossing – MDA H-2017-0027 1 STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: April 4, 2017 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: TM Crossing – MDA H-2017-0027 I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant, Brighton Investments et al, requests an amendment to the existing development agreement (MDA) (Instrument #114002254 & 2016-062220) to modify the Phase I boundary to include additional area. This will facilitate the third building permit being issued in Phase I as allowed in the development agreement prior to recordation of the plat. See Section IX Analysis for more information. II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA as requested by the applicant. The Meridian City Council heard this item on April 4, 2017. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject MDA request. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Mike Wardle ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: Mike Wardle v. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. None d. Key Council Changes to Staff/Commission Recommendation i. None III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0027 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny H-2017-0027 as presented during the hearing on April 4, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0027 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) EXHIBIT A TM Crossing – MDA H-2017-0027 2 IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The site is generally located at the northeast corner of Interstate 84 and S. Ten Mile Road, in the southwest ¼ of Section 14, Township 3N., Range 1W. B. Owner: Brighton Investments et al 12601 W. Explorer Drive, Ste. 200 Boise, ID 83713 C. Applicant: Same as Owner D. Representative: Michael D. Wardle, Brighton Corporation 12601 W. Explorer Drive, Ste. 200 Boise, ID 83713 E. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information. V. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject application is for a development agreement modification. A public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5. B. Newspaper notifications published on: March 17, 2017 C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: March 8, 2017 D. Applicant posted notice on site by: March 22, 2017 VI. LAND USE A. Existing Land Use(s): This property consists of land that is currently in the development process. B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: North: Agricultural/undeveloped land, zoned C-G West: S. Ten Mile Road and agricultural land, zoned H-E and C-C South: Interstate 84, vacant/undeveloped land, zoned M-E and RUT in Ada County East: Single-family residential properties, zoned R1 in Ada County C. History of Previous Actions:  In 2012, a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPAM-12-001) was approved that changed the future land use map (FLUM) designation on this property from Lifestyle Center (LC), Medium High-Density Residential (MHDR), and High Density Employment (HDE) to Commercial. Annexation and zoning (AZ-12-005, Ord. #14-1588) of 89.22 acres of land with C-G zoning and a development agreement (#114002254); and Preliminary Plat (PP-12-003) was approved EXHIBIT A TM Crossing – MDA H-2017-0027 3 concurrently for 50 commercial building lots and 4 common/other lots on 75.5 acres of land for TM Crossing Subdivision.  In 2014, a 2 year time extension (TED-14-001) was approved by the Director to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat, to expire on October 2, 2016. The final plat has not yet been signed by the City Engineer or recorded.  In 2016, a modification to the development agreement (H-2016-0054) was approved that allowed up to 3 building permits to be issued in Phase I prior to recordation of the plat (recorded as Inst. #2016-062220). VII. ANALYSIS The applicant requests an amendment to the Development Agreement (DA) (Inst. #2016-062220) to modify the phasing plan included in Exhibit A.4 of Exhibit A of the DA to include additional area, which is currently in the Phase II boundary, to be included in the boundary of Phase I. Per the current DA, the applicant is allowed to obtain up to 3 building permits in Phase I prior to recordation of the plat. The applicant has already obtained 2 building permits and wishes to acquire a third permit for the Paylocity building. The addition of this area in the Phase I boundary will allow the applicant to proceed forward with a building permit while the final plat for Phase II is being processed. The new Phase II plat boundary will include all of the additional area proposed to be included in the Phase I site plan boundary in the DA. Without approval of the subject modification, the plat for Phase II would need to be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the Paylocity building. Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s requested modification to the DA as shown in Exhibit A.2. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Drawings/Other 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Proposed Modified Phasing Plan for Phase I EXHIBIT A TM Crossing – MDA H-2017-0027 4 Exhibit A.1: Vicinity/Zoning Map XY ""d ""d ""d ÚÚd ÚÚd ÚÚd ÚÚd S T e n M i l e R d S L i n d e r R d S M e r i d i a n R d W Franklin Rd N L i n d e r R d ECalderwoo d D r E Overland Rd S S t o d d a r d R d S M a i n S t W Overland Rd E Franklin Rd S B l a c k C a t R d N B l a c k Ca t R d W Lamont Rd N T e n M i l e R d §¨¦84 W Heavy Ti m berDr S B e a r t o o t h W a y W Dutch Farm Rd E Corporate Dr S M a l a c h i t e A v e W A m erican Fork Dr W Bayeu x D r WKarlu k Ri v e r D r SW 1 s t S t W KodiakDr W Verbena Dr W G r e e n h e a d S t W OldsRiver Dr W Davenport St S W 7 t h A v e SW 3 r d Av e S M u s c o v y A v e W Pintail Dr W Kodiak Dr W Verbena Dr W Eider Dr S C o u n t r y T e r r a c e W a y W A s p e n C o v e D r WWaltmanDr E Ada St W Greenhead Dr W L o o n S t S L i l a c S t W Grizzly Dr W Cave Bear Ct S S p o o n b i l l A v e S D o w d y A v e W Waltman Ln W Gander Dr S M a r s h W o o d P l W Be a r Track Dr WKimra St W Jacksnipe Dr W Cub St W C o r p orate Dr S O t t e r A v e W Davis Ln W Silver Terrace Rd E King St E Williams St W CrestWood Cir W Elias St W BarrettDr S C o v e y A v e S H e i d i Pl W A s p e n C o v e C i r W HanoverCt W FulmerCt N F r i t t s L n S D e n a l i P l W Waltman St WW o o dington St S L y n w o o d Ci r S C o v e y P l W Joshua Ln S W 5 t h A v e WJacksnipe Dr E Rosalyn Dr W BearTrackCt S G u l l Co v e P l E GemSt W M a d r i d D r W Perugia St S T e c h L n W B e arTrackDr WCorporate Dr S R i p t i d e A v e W Pennwood St W Taylor Ave E Whitehall St S N o v a L n N P i n e Co n e L n N W a r d A v e NW 1 0 t h S t S L a r k s p u r S t S R i p t i d e A v e N Z i m m e r m a n Ln W Merganz e r D r W Taylor Ave W WaltmanDr W C a l d e rwood S t NW 1 3 t h P l S A r i e l L n W HonkerDr W Tenderhear t Ln W E g r e t D r S B l a c k spu r W ay W Tasa Dr W EggersPl W Va queroLn W ViewPl WValleGrandeDr S Ic e B e a r W a y S B e a r t o o t h W a y W Va l V i s t a C t S G u l l Co v e P l S P e l i c a n W a y S B e a r C l a w W a y S G a r i b a l d i A v e S R e d h e a d A v e S C o b b l e W a y S M u s c o v y A v e S M o o n s t o n e W a y S A l a s k a W a y W Crest Wood Dr S L o d e s t o n e A v e SWindyRidgeLn SSpa n ish Sun W a y S S p o o n b i l l A v e S S p o o n b i l l A v e S R i p t i d e P l S P r o g r e s s A v e S M a r l o w W a y S S o c k e y e W a y S C a n v a s b a c k Av e S C a b a l l a r L n S W 8 t h A v e S C a l i s t o g a A v e S B l u e Ma r l i n L n S O u t f i e l d W a y S R o se Ci r S Nova Ln S N o v a L n S O l d T h o r n L n EXHIBIT A TM Crossing – MDA H-2017-0027 5 Exhibit A.2: Proposed Modified Phasing Plan for Phase I Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7A ITEM TITLE: Swearing in of New Police Officers PROJECT NUMBER: MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 7B PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Empty Chair Project MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS The Boise Commons T HE B OISE C OMMONS & T HE E MPTY C HAIR P ROJECT April 18, 2017 Presented to the Meridian City Council The Boise Commons •A unique non-profit, non-partisan organization serving as a catalyst for community-building, civic development, and participatory governance. •Mission: To foster an inclusive and empowering civic life among the citizenry of Boise and the greater Treasure Valley. •Active since 2015. •Founding board members Matthew Shapiro, Jerome Mapp, and Dean Gunderson. •Website: boisecommons.org 1 Founding Board Members Matthew Shapiro is founder and lead director of The Boise Commons. Matthew’s community involvement in Boise spans 24 years and has ranged from neighborhood associations to in-depth public policy studies ,renewable energy, and education reform. Jerome Mapp has over 42 years experience in land use planning and public policy, in both the public and private sectors. He served as president of the Boise City Council in 2003 and 2004, and as president of the Idaho Planning Association from 1996 to 2000. Dean Gunderson is an urban designer with over 25 year's experience working with communities and private clients throughout the Intermountain Region. He is committed to improving the quality of life within his community through livable design, with a special emphasis in New Urbanism. 2 Scope of Interest We are interested in addressing a wide range of needs in community-building and civic capacity, including: •Helping people become comfortable with dialogue •Helping people and institutions deal with complexity and focus on the deep roots of issues. •Helping to surface assumptions. •Helping people create visions and solutions together. •Helping to overcome political polarization. •Encouraging systemic approaches. •Encouraging long-term thinking. 3 Recent & Current Projects •The State of Boise’s Neighborhood Associations –Survey and report on strengths, weaknesses, interests and needs of the city’s 30+ neighborhood associations. •Collaboration Framework for Boise Neighborhood Associations –Series of summits to help the associations design a sustainable and effective collaboration framework. •The Neighborhood Game –Fun, scavenger-hunt like activity designed to build community. •Dealing with Complexity in the Public Arena: An Introduction to Structured Dialogic Design –Demonstrations of a unique process designed to help organizations, communities, and government agencies deal more effectively with very complex issues. 4 Recent & Current Projects •Survey of Youngest Voting-Age Citizens –Completed by 1,300 Boise Schools seniors (72%) in October 2016 to gain insight into how students see voting & civic participation. •Meeting The Other –Bringing together people with opposing views to help overcome polarization and improve understanding differing viewpoints. •Civic Education Design (Proposal to the Boise School District) –Proposal to help Boise Schools design a comprehensive civic education framework, using a participatory process. •Consider.it Pilot –Pilot the use of an online platform (Consider.it) for improved public debate on an issue of concern. •The Empty Chair –Encouraging long-term thinking & inclusivity in public decisions. 5 The empty chair as a symbol 6 The empty chair as a symbol 7 The empty chair as a symbol 8 9 The Empty Chair Placard 10 The Empty Chair Commitments •Set aside an empty chair at your meetings. •Place that chair where it will be somewhat conspicuous. •Display the placard on the chair* *The placard may not even be necessary if the empty chair itself is placed very conspicuously and people understand why it’s there. 11 The Empty Chair: Why Should You? •Use it as a reminder. –A reminder to consider those not represented in the room, either because they are the Meridian residents of the future or because they are simply not present in a conversation. •Express your leadership. –Helps to show that you care about the future and about inclusiveness, and that you encourage others to do the same. •Encourage others to consider long-term effects and those not represented. –Residents, developers, or other agencies and local governments who come to the City Council. 12 13 Thank you! Contact Matthew Shapiro Director The Boise Commons http://www.boisecommons.org (208) 246-9925 / mshapiro@boisecommons.org 14 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: CDBG Program Community Development: CDBG Program Updates for Program Year 2016 and Program Year 2017 MEETING NOTES 7C Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CDBG Program Update 2016 Projects and 2017 Applications Christopher Pope, CDBG Administrator Current Project Updates Slum and Blight Plan –JUB Engineers Down Payment Assistance - ACHA Down Payment Assistance - NeighborWorks Senior Resource Guide –Mayor’s Office Streetlights – City of Meridian Hunger Relief Program – Meridian Food Bank Scholarship Program –Boys & Girls Club Emergency Rental Assistance – Jesse Tree Downtown Sidewalks -MDC 2017 CDBG Applicants Meridian Food Bank •$40,000 •Hunger Relief Services ACHA •$50,000 •Down payment, closing costs, and principle buy-down assistance Neighbor Works •$30,000 •Down payment and closing cost assistance Jesse Tree •$15,000 •Emergency rental assistance 2017 CDBG Applicants Astegos •$15,000 •Emergency Motel Voucher Program MDC •$240,000 •Downtown Sidewalk Construction MDC •$60,000 •Downtown Sidewalk Design –Part 2 MDC •$40,000 •Façade Improvement Project Next Steps CDBG Committee Reviews Applications – April 28 Development of Recommendations and Action Plan – May 1 -11 Presentation to City Council – May 16 Public Comment Period – May 16 -June 20 Questions or Concerns? Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 8A PROJECT NUMBER: H-2017-0011 ITEM TITLE: Meridian Meadows Senior Community Public Hearing for Meridian Meadows Senior Community (H-2017-001 1) by Giza Development/Michael Wright Located 2662 E. Magic View Drive 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 5.28 Acres of Land with an L -O Zoning DistrictRequest: Conditional Use Permit for a Nursing/Residential Care Facility in an L -O Zoning District MEETING NOTES L✓i APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CityCouncilMeeting April 18, 2017 Item #8A: Meridian Meadows Senior Community Zoning/Aerial Map ÚÚd C-G R2 C-G C-G C-G I-L L-O C2 R-4 R1 C-C L-O L-O R1 RUT R-40 L-O RUT R1 C-N I-L RUT R6 R-15 R-8 RUT L-O C2 R1 C-G L-O R1 C-G C-C R1 I-L R-15 RUT R-2 I-L M1 RUT C-G E FRANKLIN RD S L O C U S T G R O V E R D E C E N T R A L D R S E A G L E R D §¨¦84 E WATERTOWER ST E ST LUKES ST E PRATT ST E KALISPELL ST E BOLLMAN S T E MAGIC VIEW DR S B A L T I M O R E A V E E BOWSTRING ST S R A V E N S W O O D D R E L A T T I C E D R E SPRINGWOOD DR E B E N T L E Y D R N N O L A R D E MAGIC VIEW DR N O L S O N A V E N G A U D I A N S A V E S H I C K O R Y W A Y EWOODBRIDGEDR E PEGRAM S T S A L L E N S T S T O R I N O A V E E PEGRAM ST E AUTUMN WAY S R A C K H A M W A Y E GREINER ST E WELLS CIR E SPRINGWOOD DR S W O O D H A V E N D R E AUTUMN WAY E GENTRY WAY S H I C K O R Y W A Y S W E A T H E R B Y D R E PROMENADE ST S C R O S S T I M B E R P L E LOUISE DR S B R O O K L Y N A V E E CADILLAC DR E C O N T I N E N T A L D R E FR E E W A Y D R S W E L L S S T S W E L L S S T S B E A M A V E S T R U S S P L S T R U S S LN S W O O D H A V E N A V E S T I B U R O N A V E S T O R I N O A V E S T R U N N E L A V E S T R U S S A V E S T H O R N W O O D W A Y S T O U C H M A R K W A Y S T R U N N E L A V E S T O R I N O A V E S T R U S S A V E S T I B U R O N A V E S T H O R N W O O D D R E C L I F T O N D R S M U S T A N G S T Site Plan Landscape Plan Conceptual Building Elevations Changes to Agenda: None Item #8A: Meridian Meadows Senior Community (H-2017-0011) Application(s):  Annexation & Zoning  Conditional Use Permit Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 5.28 acres of land, zoned RUT in Ada County, located at 2662 E. Magic View Drive. History: This property is platted as Lot 5 in the Amended Magic View Subdivision. In 2016, a MFR development (i.e. Pope’s Garden) was proposed to develop on this site and was denied by City Council. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Office Summary of Request: Request for annexation & zoning of 5.28 acres of land with an L-O zoning district consistent with the FLUM designation of Office for this property. The proposed zoning will provide a transition in zoning and uses from adjacent residences to the west, north & east and future commercial uses to the south & east. A DA is recommended as a provision of annexation with the conditions noted in the staff report. A CUP is requested for a nursing/residential care facility in the proposed L-O district. The site plan submitted with the application depicts two buildings; one consisting of 37,800 s.f. with 50 skilled nursing/residential units & one consisting of 43,400 s.f. containing 30 assisted living & 30 memory care units. Two driveway accesses are proposed via E. Magic View Drive, one on the portion classified as a local street on the west end and one on the portion classified as a collector street on the east end. The UDC requires access to be provided from a local street when one exists and restricts access to collector streets unless otherwise waived by Council; the applicant is requesting a waiver from Council for the access via the collector street. Right-of-way for Hickory Way is stubbed to this site at the NWC from Greenhill Estates Subdivision; however, the ROW has never been opened or the stub constructed. Extension of the stub street is not proposed but a gated emergency access is proposed. The Comp Plan supports stub streets being extended for vehicular connections between developments and better traffic flow. In this case, traffic currently flows east to Eagle Road & west through Woodbridge Subdivision to Locust Grove Road. Extension of Hickory Way south to Magic View Drive will provide a means of access in this area via Franklin Road to the north, which will improve traffic flow and better disperse traffic in this area. Therefore, staff recommended that Hickory Way be extended along the west boundary of this site with development; however, the Commission’s recommendation to Council did not include the requirement for extension of Hickory. Note: When ACHD reviewed the previous development plan for this site (Pope’s Garden), the off-site portion of unopened right-of-way (Hickory Way) at the NWC of the site was required to be improved as a pedestrian, bicycle and emergency access only; the ROW for the future extension of Hickory Way from the north property line to Magic View Drive was not to be dedicated as right -of-way to ACHD but as an easement to the City. ACHD’s position on this matter has not changed. Where access to a local street is not available, the property owner is required to grant a cross-access/ingress-egress easement to adjoining properties. Because access isn’t available via a local street for the adjacent property to the east, staff recommen ds a cross- access/ingress-egress easement is provided. Two conceptual perspective drawings of the entrances of the future structures were submitted with this application. Building materials are proposed to consist of horizontal & vertical board and batten style hardie board siding of multiple colors, stone veneer columns and accent walls at the entrance with asphalt shingles. The architectural character of the structures is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the Architectural Standards Manual. Commission Recommendation: Approval without the requirement for Hickory to be extended Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Michael Wright, Applicant; Kent Brown, Applicant’s Representative; Kevin Amar, Property Owner; Celeste Fox; Gene Fox, John Mundt ii. In opposition: David Ballard, Ron Vance iii. Commenting: Rich Howell, Laurie Somazzi, Mary Rockrohr iv. Written testimony: Kent Brown, Applicant’s Representative (response to the staff report) Key Issue(s) of public testimony: i. Most of the testimony was in favor of the project but not the extension of Hickory Way south to Magic View Drive; ii. Neighbors would like fencing and a berm along the north property boundary for a sight and sound barrier; iii. Concern regarding “cut-through” traffic through Greenhill Estates Subdivision if Hickory Way is extended; iv. Improvements needed to Magic View Drive to meet current and future traffic demands. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. Staff’s recommendation that Hickory Way is extended to the south to Magic View Drive; general traffic concerns in this area; Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. The Commission did not recommend approval of the extension of Hickory Way (modified conditions #1.1.1d and #1.1.3b); Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. If Hickory Way should be extended south to Magic View Drive along the west boundary of the site consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which supports stub street being extended for vehicular connections between developments and better traffic flow. ii. A waiver to UDC 11-3A-3 is requested from Council for approval of the easternmost access via E. Magic View Drive, a collector street. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Kent Brown, Applicant’s Representative (in agreement w/Commission Recommendation); petition from Greenhill Estates subdivision in favor of proposed development as recommended by the Commission (see letter for more information); Woodbridge Homeowner’s Association (in favor of proposed development as recommended by the Commission). Update: When this was before the City Council last year as the Pope’s Garden project, the Council directed a letter be sent to ACHD requesting a traffic study of this area to determine possible solutions to the traffic issues. ACHD staff has preliminarily reviewed this area and it does not appear there are alternatives to the existing conditions without substantial redevelopment that is unlikely to occur. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017-0011, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 18, 2017: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0011, as presented during the hearing on April 18, 2017, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0011 to the hearing date of April 18, 2017 for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: April 18, 2017 Item # Project Number: Project Name: H-2017-0011 Meridian Meadows Senior Community Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (YIN) `qX a vz f r O Ai/ C W47 s7'�,Z, ` r r 18,0 sr7a H CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET Date: April 18, 2017 Item # Project Number: H-2017-0011 Project Name: Meridian Meadows Senior Community Please print your name For Against Neutral Do you wish to testify (Y/N) Liv es VA),tJ 4"Pa ASV w✓ Tb W �t t -L 0 a C/ UY C cD +C1I L� /\, ftic en vz CL wC° Qre�� D r T �'�' JJ P` JJ z - i f Zig _ v WARM, _ d = Hill f l " D`? y � ice' >•_ .�:.�� • • A O I 0 - iA ,;i nq Aa5h e)v) ��avi rr�9 �.00 d Bx-1 wec� C-orner wi � �'za.�/�nJ S�.00d a.�d � X009 bus Slop . map p�cd �o eapkuvv he�dkborS o+% AiA6V- YVtoorn.jVn wWk-- l Vim rcl +�� +a.WY9 , �d LAA +kil-j d'►d vxo� k -how I via -S +fAe�e, u vi4� I �FIas� W -e f of -F- `llllu are dr. -fie 9,4+ m #OI u sig, -plaShi �Gl G 1'�Oj C O �v"tP•Yr -:W- to ust Rask, School h(As 3iop is 6eori " 1 +e W10-0 bob. Oh -ham l-tr'+ of PI Toto. Ok SQA+ �M u,&M 4„r V -� = E- POOM9MLA8 •u0113as IngJ ut sauzog OS -/+ agj jo sluapisaa Aq ssa.z.2a pup ssa i2ut poog.zoqu-2tau zoj AI.znln2a.z pasn salvisg Iltguaa.zg 3o uotlaas u.zalsea Luo.zj.2utuzo3 prow smogs osIV •ajnoz pasodoid uo suinj a12ue aa.z2ap -06 .zot.z@Iut UlgjjM paJUaol SAI?ManiJp ajdtllnwjo sd-eVq a12oog uzoa3 ologd Iei.zay V ligtuxg IS oaad Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9A ITEM TITLE: Police Department: Staffing Study PROJECT NUMBER: MEETING NOTES vx-1111� Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Developed for Meridian Police Department by Amy Harig Aaron, PhD February 27, 2017 Tag Line, LLC 313 N Storybook Way Eagle, Idaho 83616 www.taglineconsulting.org Patrol Staffing &Resource Analysis 15% 30%55%Administrative Crashes & CFS Officer-initiated Executive summary iFebruary 27, 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis The Police Allocation Model (PAM)was developed by the Center for Public Safety at Northwestern University in 1988- 1993 for municipal police agencies.It uses a combination of workload requirements,performance objectives, personnel policies and roadway characteristics to determine the total staff required to deliver patrol and traffic services.It is a time-based model that balances reactive work (crashes and citizen-initiated calls for service),proactive contacts (self-initiated calls),uncommitted patrol and administrative duties. Officer Visibility Officer Proactivity 16 , 9 1 4 16 , 8 0 6 16 , 8 3 3 16 , 0 4 1 17 , 1 4 5 17 , 6 1 6 19 , 1 4 8 20 , 1 4 8 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 Crashes & CFS 73 , 0 4 0 75 , 2 9 0 75 , 0 9 2 76 , 5 1 0 78 , 2 9 0 81 , 3 8 0 85 , 2 4 0 91 , 3 1 0 91 , 4 2 0 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 Population 25 , 2 7 5 26 , 0 4 7 26 , 6 7 4 27 , 1 8 7 27 , 7 7 3 28 , 8 1 4 30 , 2 2 0 31 , 4 6 0 32 , 9 3 2 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 Housing 46 47 48 50 52 52 51 52 50 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 Patrol +30%50 ±4 officers CA D S Y S T E M C H A N G E +25%+19% A police allocation model was developed for the city of Meridian to determine the number of officers required to deliver patrol and traffic services in 2017,and to forecast future needs based on anticipated changes in population and housing.COMPASS Communities in Motion 2040 estimates Meridian’s population at 108,701 in 2020 with a 17% increase in housing compared to 2015.Population and housing are both forecasted to increase another 9%by 2025. Every 2 hours on arterials 1x per wk on local roads 2x per wk on collectors Patrol frequency Model Inputs Performance Goals Operations Roadways Shift length Work week # of officers per sergeant %of time sergeants should spend on field work Average paid time off per person per year Average on-duty training time per person per year Miles of roadway by type Average uncommitted patrol speed Workload Total CAD incidents per year Average time on call % requiring a back up officer % with a report Average time to write a report Based on current workload,shifts and personnel time off,the PAM recommends 73 officers to meet patrol and traffic services for the city of Meridian –a conservative estimate compared to two other staffing models.MPD currently has 9 sergeant and 57 officer authorized positions and would need to add 7 officers to meet agency performance goals for visibility and proactivity. Recommendation ~ add officers in 2017 ~ plan for another by 2020 & by 2025 Staffing Recommendation 73 Total 9 sergeants 64 officers 88 Total 11 sergeants 77 officers 95 Total 12 sergeants 83 officers 2017 Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………..….. i Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… ii Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… ii Policing Overview 2006-2016…………………………………………………………………………………..… 1 •Incident type trends …………………………………………………………… 3 •Growth forecast …………………………………………………………………. 5 •Patrol officers and teams ……….………………………………………..… 6 Police Allocation Model …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 •Operations data ………………..…….……….………………………………. 8 •Roadway data…………………………………………………………..………… 9 •Workload data………………………………………..………………………… 10 •PAM Staffing Recommendation ….……………………………………. 11 •PAM Staffing Forecast for 2020 and 2025 …………………….….. 12 Data Sources and Methods …………..………………………………………………………………………….. 13 •Net Annual Work Hours …………………………..………………………. 14 COPS Workload-Based Assessment ……………………………………………………………………….…. 17 Table of Contents The following staffing and resource analysis of Meridian Police Department's patrol and traffic services is based on data provided by the MPD Analytical Services Unit.Data include: •CAD policing incidents (Northrop-Grumman for Jan 2006-Feb 2016 and TriTech for Apr 2016-Nov 2016); •Reports and arrests from RMS (Jan 2006-Nov 2016); •Patrol schedules from 2008-2016;and •Time off per person from the payroll/time management system (Jan 2011-Nov 2016). Data on population,housing and roadways were identified from U.S.Census,Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS)and City of Meridian websites. There are multiple ways to summarize CAD incidents,and procedural changes in how officers track their time in the field and office can make standardization challenging.For these analyses,I grouped call types into four categories defined by the Police Allocation Model (PAM):administrative activities,crashes,other citizen-initiated calls for service,and officer-initiated proactive contacts.I eliminated administrative calls from the dataset,and occasionally present crashes and other CFS as a combined measure of total citizen-initiated calls for service. Please see Data Sources and Methods on page 13 for a more detailed description of the data elements used in the analyses. Introduction iiFebruary 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis 36% 61% 3% Prioirity 1-1P Priority 2 Priority 2P-3 20 , 9 5 7 23 , 1 5 9 24 , 6 9 6 23 , 2 3 3 25 , 5 9 5 33 , 7 5 4 36 , 7 0 2 33 , 3 3 2 29 , 3 4 7 25 , 6 0 5 25 , 7 5 0 18 , 4 0 1 18 , 4 2 6 16 , 9 1 4 16 , 8 0 6 16 , 8 3 3 16 , 0 4 1 17 , 1 4 5 17 , 6 1 6 19 , 1 4 8 20 , 1 4 8 18 , 0 0 0 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Police Incidents (CAD) Crashes and other citizen-initiated… Policing Overview 2006-2016 1February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis *2016 total calls are estimates based on Northrop-Grumman CAD data from Jan-Feb. †2016 estimates for individual incident groups are based on Northrop-Grumman data from Jan-Feb and TriTech data for Apr-Nov. Total police incidents recorded in CAD (excluding administrative call types) have averaged 45,000 contacts per year for the past 10 years –a rate of 5,900 incidents per 10,000 population (95% confidence interval: 5,500-6,200). When crashes and citizen-initiated calls for service (CFS)are lower,like in 2011, patrol officers can dedicate a greater proportion of their time to proactive contacts.Since 2012,CFS have been steadily increasing,reducing the amount of time officers have for proactive work. On average CFS take longer to handle than officer-initiated contacts,and they are more likely to result in a report. Incidents by Priority and Call Source Top Officer-initiated, Proactive Contacts by Incident Group 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*† Traffic stops 15,257 16,575 18,007 16,469 18,269 24,392 24,935 19,815 19,362 17,216 17,500† Security checks 327 403 558 694 1,325 1,733 3,670 6,142 3,094 2,031 1,450* Suspicious situation 1,088 1,338 1,219 1,117 1,250 1,567 1,514 1,218 1,020 1,033 1,020† The proportion of each call type that is priority 1, 2 and 3 has remained consistent. 18% 68% 14%12% 88% Crashes Other Citizen-Initiated Calls for Service Officer-Initiated, Proactive Contacts 893 891 867 659 788 1114 1146 706 802 1037 977 484 451 600 192 194 118 57 35 76 210 118 0 450 900 1350 1800 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016* On-View Adult Juvenile 564 659 621 468 440 398 433 395 425 551 425 50 60 64 50 48 36 29 26 48 46 23 0 200 400 600 800 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016* Warrant 769 863 915 649 674 719 672 667 721 775 706 402 467 372 481 572 569 580 649 648 608 1,003 0 450 900 1350 1800 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016* Summons or Citation Each year, 15-20% of police incidents result in an MPD departmental report and 6-8% end in arrest. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*† Incidents with an MPD DR (CAD) 7,804 7,774 7,119 6,276 6,389 6,575 6,806 6,651 6,800 7,326 8,500† Arrests (RMS) 3,162 3,398 3,441 2,500 2,717 2,959 2,920 2,478 2,724 3,229 3,260* * 2016 arrests are adjusted for a full year based on RMS data from Jan-Nov. † 2016 estimates for individual incident groups are based on Northrop-Grumman data from Jan-Feb and TriTech data for Apr-Nov. Arrests by Type and Age Group (RMS) Reports and Arrests 0 75 150 225 300 375 450 Suicide Incidents (CAD) 0 150 300 450 DUI report (RMS) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Crash report (RMS) DUI Team 8% increase in crash reports each year (average) 3% increase in DUI reports each year (average) Crash reports not defined by type in these years DUI grants 0 50 100 150 200 250 Mental Commitment or Hold (RMS) 10% increase in suicide calls each year (average) 12% increase in mental holds each year (average) Mental health * 2016 total calls are estimates based on Northrop-Grumman data from Jan-Feb; reports are based on RMS data from Jan-Nov. Traffic 3February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis MPD’s police incidents and reports all follow a similar trend:steady increase in numbers to a peak in 2012,and then a slight decline.Some exceptions include the following incidents which are on a steady upward trend.In some cases, like suicide calls and mental holds,these are high intensity situations that require a significant amount of officer time. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016* Traffic problem (CAD) 1,632 1,482 1,494 1,335 1,394 1,498 1,780 1,824 1,780 1,660 1,350* Drunk or reckless driver check (CAD) 895 816 814 972 1,037 1,116 1,296 1,124 1,230 1,311 1,150* Incident Type Trends 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Misdemeanor and Felony Reports Felony Misdemeanor 0 75 150 225 300 375 Domestic Disturbance and Information Reports 0 50 100 150 200 Commercial 0 50 100 150 200 Residential 3% decline each year (average) * 2016 total calls are estimates based on Northrop-Grumman data from Jan-Feb; reports are based on RMS data from Jan-Nov. Domestic Violence (RMS) 4February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis 32% increase last year 2% increase each year (average) Overall,domestic violence has followed a similar pattern as other incidents,except for the last two years. Misdemeanor and felony reports increased by 32%last year,and reports of domestic disturbances jumped 27%the year before. 27% increase 0 100 200 300 400 500 Drugs and alcohol incidents 0 20 40 60 80 100 Overdose Burglary reports (RMS) Drug and Alcohol (CAD) 7% increase in D&A incidents each year (average) 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total (projected)Crashes and other citizen-initiated CFS Officer-initiated, proactive contacts 5February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Population Housing Units 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Communities in Motion 2040 (population)Number of residents (Census with COMPASS) 0 7500 15000 22500 30000 37500 45000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Communities in Motion 2040 (households)Number of housing units (Census + annual residential permits) Police Incidents Based on the average of 5,900 incidents per 10,000 population and the COMPASS population estimates above,MPD should expect 64,000 and 70,000 total incidents,respectively.Total incidents will ultimately be determined by the percent of time officers dedicate to proactive work,but the city can expect 25,000 crash and citizen-initiated calls for service in 2020 and 27,250 in 2025. Growth Forecast ↑25% ↑30% ↑19% Based on the December patrol schedule for each year,MPD has had 48-52 officers,corporals and sergeants dedicated to patrol and traffic services (including specialty teams)since 2008.This number will increase to 55 in 2017 once trainees complete their program.Overall,the number of officers has effectively increased by 4 (9%)in the last 8 years.During this same time period (2008 to 2016),the population of Meridian increased 25%,the number of housing units jumped 30%,and crashes and citizen calls for service increased by nearly 20%;page 5. Officers per team remained relatively unchanged until late 2014,when MPD implemented a cover shift and DUI Team.Their goal for the coming year is to add field supervision for the cover shifts,and establish a year-round Bike Team and Impact officer. # officers (all ranks)46 47 48 50 52 52 51 52 50 49 # trainees 2 3 4 6 2 0 0 6 0 6 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 NOW 2008 →2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 → goal Watch Command/Admin (2 LT, 1 SGT)SGT → non-sworn fleet Days 2 SGT,2 CPL 8 officers +1 +1 +2 -1 -1 2 SGT,2 CPs 8 officers Swings 2 SGT,2 CPL 12 officers -4 +1 -1 2 SGT,2 CPL 8 officers Graves 2 SGT,2 CPL 9 officers -1 +4 -2 2 SGT,2 CPL 8 officers Traffic 4 officers +1 CPL +1 SGT +2 -2 +1 -2 +2 1 SGT,1 CPL 6 officers Bike (seasonal)(all year) 2 officers 2 officers Cover +6 +2 SGT +2 CPL,+2 2 SGT,2 CPL 8 officers DUI +2 2 officers K9 +5 5 officers Impact 1 officer major reorganization 6February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Current Staffing As of February 2017, MPD has 66 authorized, sworn positions dedicated to patrol and traffic services: 9 sergeants and 57 corporals & officers Patrol Officers and Teams Police Allocation Model (PAM) Police Allocation Manual:Determination of the number and allocation of personnel for patrol and traffic services for municipal law enforcement agencies,version M3.0 (October 1993).Prepared by the Center for Public Safety at Northwestern University for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (contract no.DTNH22-92-C-05051). The Police Allocation Model (PAM)uses a combination of workload requirements,performance objectives,personnel policies and roadway characteristics to determine the total staff required to deliver patrol and traffic services in Meridian. 7February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Data on workload requirements,performance objectives,personnel policies and roadway characteristics are required to determine the total staff for patrol and traffic services in Meridian.An excel workbook of the model based on the published formulas and the model inputs described in the next few sections allows MPD to see the staffing impact at multiple decision points. Model Inputs Number of officers to service all CFS and crashes (reactive workload)is based on the average total obligated time per day and the agency shift length.Number of officers for uncommitted patrol time is based on the number to provide adequate visibility on highways and neighborhoods and respond to emergency and non-emergency activities in timely manner. There are many allocation models that an agency could select for planning,but the PAM is a good option for MPD’s long-term use. •It is free -Many allocation models are proprietary. •Data requirements are reasonable –The model relies primarily on CAD data that MPD analysts work with on a daily basis.The most time consuming part is grouping the incident types into consistent categories. •It is not overly simple –Some staffing models,like officers per resident,are limited in what they can estimate. The PAM has multiple factors in its calculation and as a result,its recommendation is often more conservative (and likely more accurate)than many simpler methods. # to service crashes and CFS # to provide a specified level of uncommitted patrol 1 Proportion of each hour spent on administrative activities by each on-duty officer Proportion of each hour spent on self-initiated activities by each on- duty officer average # of on-duty officers required per day Four on-duty time considerations crashes and citizen calls for service uncommitted patrol administrative duties officer-initiated, proactive contacts time spent free (e.g. patrolling highways or neighborhoods) time spent in court, briefings, etc. time spent on self-initiated, community policing work time spent responding to crashes and calls (reactive) PAM formula 8February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Model Factor Source Input Shift length (hours)Policy choice based on current schedule 10 Average work week (average number of paid hours per week per officer)Total contracted time based on current schedule 40 Average number of benefit (paid) off-duty hours per year per officer Calculated from the NAWH analysis of patrol, corporals and sergeants for 2011-2016 280 Average number of on-duty hours spent on non- patrol temporary assignments per year per officer Calculated for 10 in-house training hrs every month plus 40 hrs of additional training per year 160 Average number of officers to be supervised by each field supervisor Policy choice based on an average of the current span of supervision 7 Percentage of field supervisor on-duty time spent on uncommitted patrol, reactive and self-initiated activities Policy choice based on command recommendation 50% 55 8 41 4 30 3 23 8 19 5 16 9 23 6 51 1 65 2 78 6 83 4 94 1 10 2 1 10 4 3 10 6 9 11 5 4 13 1 4 13 7 7 12 7 6 10 8 5 10 6 1 10 1 7 96 5 75 2 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 AM PM DAYS (0700-1700) COVER (1100-2100) SWINGS (1600-0200) GRAVES (2100-0700) Current Shift Schedule compared to Citizen Calls for Service per Hour Operations Data Unless MPD chooses to change their current shift schedules and workweek,operational inputs are not likely to change in the model (although you can use the model to explore what a shift change would look like).Additionally, NAWH calculations were consistent across ranks and years,so these are likely to remain valid for future use. Rank 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*multi-yr average Patrol officer 1803 1792 1772 1788 1728 1724 1770 Corporal 1832 1826 1829 1828 1722 1816 1810 Sergeant 1828 1811 1833 1660 1768 1830 1790 Net Annual Work Hours (average # of hours worked per person per year) 9February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Performance Goal for Officer Visibility and Availability Local Patrol frequency = once per week (an officer will pass a fixed point every 168 hours) Arterial Patrol frequency = 5x per shift (an officer will pass a fixed point every 2 hours)Collector Patrol frequency = double local roads (patrol interval 84 hours) Model Factor Source Input Arterials =interstates and expressways, as well as roads that carry most of the traffic entering and leaving urban areas. Access is controlled or limited, which allows for high traffic volumes and speeds. Example: Interstate 84, State Highway 44, Eagle Road Miles of arterial roads From pg 3-12 in the City of Meridian Existing Conditions Report 2014 131.6 Average uncommitted patrol speed (MPH)Estimate 10 MPH less than posted speed limits 45 Patrol interval (hours) performance objective Policy choice 2 Collectors = provide traffic circulation within residential, commercial, and industrial areas and carry trips to and from arterials. Example: Larger “through” streets in residential neighborhoods Miles of collector roads From pg 3-12 in the City of Meridian Existing Conditions Report 2014 19.4 Average uncommitted patrol speed (MPH)Estimate 10 MPH less than posted speed limits 25 Patrol interval (hours) performance objective Policy choice 84 Local = most residential and other “small” streets Miles of local roads From pg 3-12 in the City of Meridian Existing Conditions Report 2014 385.1 Average uncommitted patrol speed (MPH)Estimate 5 MPH less than posted speed limits 20 Patrol interval (hours) performance objective Policy choice 168 Roadway Data Roadway data should be updated in the model whenever current information is available.Miles of roadway strongly influences the number of officers needed to meet officer visibility goals,so they should be as current as possible. Data included here are from 2014 which will underestimate the number of officers needed for a city growing as quickly as Meridian.Patrol speeds were estimated based on average speed limits,but the model should be updated if/when these values can be more accurately calculated. 19%36%16% 67% 62%84% 14%2%0% CRASH CFS OTHER OFIN Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 2P or 3 15% 33% 52% Current Incidents by Type Administrative activities* Crashes and citizen CFS Officer-initiated contacts 15% 30%55% Performance Goal *Administrative time is estimated at 15% by command staff; Report writing is included as part of call time 10February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Performance Goal for Officer Proactivity Workload Data Crash Response All Other Citizen CFS Officer-initiated Contacts Call source any 9 = 911 or T = telephone R = radio Total incidents per year (average of 2013-2015) 2,453 16,518 29,428 Average time on call 1 hour 50 min 20 min %with MPD departmental report 64%24%5% Average time to write a report 30 min 40 min 40 min %by priority # of officers (all ranks excluding Lieutenant)COMPASS population Officers per 1,000 citizensPatrolCIDSROTotal Current 66 19 11 96 91,420 1.05 2017 95 27 11 133 91,420 1.45 2020 98 28 12 137 94,289 1.45 2025 112 32 14 158 108,701 1.45 11February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Based on current workload,shifts and personnel time off,the model recommends 73 officers of all ranks to meet patrol and traffic services for the city of Meridian.This would provide officers with: •Uncommitted time to patrol Meridian highways every 2 hours and neighborhood roads once a week; •Availability to immediately respond to priority 2,2P and 3 calls;and •55%of their time to dedicate to proactive,community- oriented policing contacts. Current -2017 PAM Staffing Recommendations 73 Total •Officers dedicated to patrol and traffic services 9 sergeants 64 corporals & officers MPD currently has 9 sergeant and 57 corporal/officer authorized positions. Recommendation:officers to meet agency performance goals for visibility and proactivity Benchmark Cities:MPD’s patrol staffing analysis based on officers per 1,000 citizens recommends 95 patrol officers to meet the 1.45 officers per 1,000 citizens average of benchmark cities.Officers per 1,000 include all sworn personnel,not just patrol,so this recommendation is based on MPD’s 2017 organizational chart,keeping school resource officers (SRO)at 11 and splitting the recommended increase between patrol and criminal investigations division (CID)at their current proportions (78%:22%,respectively).Forecasts for 2020 and 2025 were based on the same calculations;however,school resource officers were also added. Comparison to other models COPS:Performance-Based Approach to Police Staffing and Allocation (August 2012)model using the same model inputs recommends 93 patrol officers.The COPS workload model is based on citizen-initiated calls for service –total number,time spent on CFS,and the ideal percent of officer time that should be dedicated to them.It also includes a shift relief factor,but does not distinguish between uncommitted patrol and proactive time,has fewer performance options and lumps all reports into administrative duties.See pages 17-18 for additional calculation details. Year # CFS per year %w/more than 1 officer Average time on call Adjusted for 25% CFS goal Adjusted for shift relief Total officers 2017 18,972 calculated per shift x 4 x 2.2 93 2020 25,000 66%51 min x 4 x 2.2 120 2025 27,250 66%51 min x 4 x 2.2 131 12February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis PAM Staffing Forecast Model Inputs 2017 2020 2025 COMPASS Communities in Motion 2040 Forecast Population 108,701 118,600 Households 36,941 (17% increase)40,412 (9% increase) Average incident rate (2006-2016)calculated from incident rate adjusted for population Crashes 275 crashes per 10,000 3,000 3,250 Citizen-initiated CFS 2,000 other CFS per 10,000 21,750 23,750 Officer-initiated contacts 3,500 contacts per 10,000 38,000 41,500 Miles of roadway (2014)calculated from the increase in households –local at same rate, collector at half and arterials at a one-third Arterials 131.6 mi +5.6% = 139.0 +3% = 143.1 Collector 19.4 mi +8.5% = 21.0 +4.5% = 22.0 Local 385.1 mi +17% = 450.6 +9% = 491.1 If we adjust the number of crashes,citizen calls for service,officer-initiated contacts and miles of roadway to account for population and housing growth,and keep all other inputs the same,the PAM recommends 88 officers by 2020 and 95 by 2025.These staffing levels would provide officers with: •Uncommitted time to patrol Meridian highways every 2 hours and neighborhood roads once a week; •Availability to immediately respond to priority 2,2P and 3 calls;and •55%of their time to dedicate to proactive,community-oriented policing contacts. The Benchmark Cities officers per 1,000 model recommends only 12-18%more patrol staff for 2020 and 2025 (98 and 112 total officers,respectively),but the COPS model forecasts 36-38%more patrol staff (120 and 131 officers). 88 Total •Officers dedicated to patrol and traffic services 11 sergeants 77 corporals & officers Recommends an additional 2 sergeants and 13 officers 95 Total •Officers dedicated to patrol and traffic services 12 sergeants 83 corporals & officers Recommends an additional 1 sergeant and 6 officers There are multiple ways to summarize CAD incidents,and procedural changes in how officers track their time in the field and office can make standardization challenging.For this analysis,call types were grouped into categories defined by the Patrol Allocation Model (PAM):administrative activities,crashes,other CFS and officer-initiated contacts (see PAM workbook for MPD_TLFeb2017.xlsx for the calls included each category). Administrative activities (ADMIN)–Includes call types related to reports,court attendance,training,follow-up,VIN inspection,citation services and calls not usually serviced by patrol such as code enforcement and SRO activities. Nonsworn animal control officers handled most nuisance animal calls prior to 2014,so incident types LOOSE/DEAD/INJ ANIMAL and DOG PROBLEM are considered ADMIN in 2006-2013 and patrol in 2014-2016, either as a citizen call for service or officer-initiated contact depending on the call source. Administrative activities are excluded from trend analyses because they are likely a significant underreporting of the time officers’spend on reports,follow-up activities,court and other administrative work.They are also not required for the PAM calculations,but the data are included for information. Crash response (CRASH)–Includes all accident and hit-and-run incident types regardless of call source. Other citizen calls for service (CFS OTHER)–A call for service includes all non-administrative incidents other than crashes in which a citizen contacted the police and an officer was dispatched to handle that call (call source =9 and T).Crashes are included for TOTAL citizen-initiated calls for service. Officer-initiated,proactive contacts (OFIN)–Self-initiated activities other than crashes in which an officer checks out on the radio or MDT to help a citizen or investigate a situation (call source =R). Staffing Model Inputs The PAM model recommends 1-3 years,so workload data for both models is based on CAD incidents from 2013- 2015.The CAD record of the primary responder was used when available.Time on call was calculated as close time minus dispatch time.Calls with times >24 hours (228 of them –less than 0.15%)were excluded from model calculations because they were likely errors (e.g.the officer forgot to close out). Workload Trends Eleven years of data (2006-2016)were used to demonstrate policing trends whenever possible.MPD’s CAD system switched to TriTech in 2016,so 2016 data may be: •Excluded from the information; •Estimated for a full year based on 2 months of Northrop-Grumman data (Jan-Feb);or •Estimated for a full year based on 2 months of Northrop-Grumman data (Jan-Feb)and 8 months of TriTech data (Apr-Nov). The estimate method for 2016 data is noted on all graphs and tables. Workload: Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) Data Data Sources and Methods Workload: Records Management System (RMS) Data 13February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Cases and arrests from MPD’s New World RMS system were provided for Jan 2006 –Nov 2016.Data were estimated for Dec 2016 based on the prior 11 months to provide 11 full years of data for identifying trends.Most arrest and case records have multiple charges associated with them,so duplicate entries were removed to summarize total arrests.Case data was used to investigate specific charge types only. 14February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Population, Housing and Roadways •Census population and housing data were from American Fact Finder,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics:2000 and Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics:2010: https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml •COMPASS population estimates were from 1990-2016 Population Estimates by City Limit Boundaries (Updated 4/1/2016):http://compassidaho.org/documents/prodserv/demo/2016PopulationEstimateOfficialHistoric.pdf •COMPASS population and housing forecast was from Communities in Motion 2040 Forecast by Demographic Area: http://compassidaho.org/documents/prodserv/demo/2040ForecastDemographicArea.pdf •Data on annual residential permits including the number of new single family homes,multi-family units and manufactured /mobile homes were compiled from City Construction Reports,Detailed Reports (Updated Monthly),Compiled Summary of Activity FY2017.xls:http://www.meridiancity.org/building.aspx?id=17746 •Roadway data including total miles of roadway by type was taken from the City of Meridian Existing Conditions Report 2014,page 3-12.These data were from 2014 and follow COMPASS roadway classifications: http://compassidaho.org/documents/prodserv/CIMupdate/FunctionalClassification_Nutshell.pdf Net Annual Work Hours (NAWH)represents the number of hours staff are actually available to work based on the contracted number of hours per year (40 hrs per week x 52 weeks per year =2,080 hrs)minus the average number of hours off per person per year.Out of 2080 hours contracted per employee per year,MPD patrol staff work an average of 1800 hours per year.This total is consistent among years and ranks for the positions evaluated,and can be used to calculate a relief factor for staffing analyses.Based solely on this relief factor -not workload -MPD needs 5 FTEs to cover each 24-hr patrol post. Relief Coverage per Post # hrs per day # days per week # weeks per year # hrs per year for 1 post Net Annual Work Hours Total FTEs needed to cover 1 post Patrol Sergeant 24 7 52 8,736 1,790 4.9 Patrol Corporal 24 7 52 8,736 1,810 4.8 Patrol Officer 24 7 52 8,736 1,800 4.9 Net Annual Work Hours (NAWH)analysis is based on D.R.Liebert and R.Miller’s Staffing Analysis Workbook for Jails, 2nd edition (2003),National Institute of Corrections,Washington,DC. NAWH was calculated for multiple calendar years from an export of time management records provided by MPD. Data included employee ID,first name,last name,current job title,work date,work code and description,#of hours and current division (“Dist.Code”and “Dist.Code Desc”)for all employee records from August 21,2006 through December 20,2016 for Department =(2110)Police.Meridian's time management records provide only the current position and division for each employee -not their assignment at the time of the record –so individuals included in each year’s NAWH calculation are based on the patrol schedules also provided by MPD: •Sergeants and Corporals were included if they were on the schedule for the full calendar year.Individuals who were promoted or had an assignment out of patrol mid year were not included. •Patrol officers were included if they were on the December schedule and had a full 12 months of time data. Individuals from all patrol teams were included.School Resource Officers were excluded. NAWH Calculation Net Annual Work Hours *Only 50 weeks of data provided for 2016 Average # of hours off per employee per year, by category Patrol Officer Corporal Sergeant Patrol Officer Corporal Sergeant Year:2016*2015 # of individuals included in calculation: 33 7 7 34 6 8 THC*Total hours contracted per employee per year (40 hr/wk, 52 wk/yr)2000 2000 2000 2080 2080 2080 4 Sick 74.33 37.14 36.14 68.74 84.58 33.44 5 Vacation 102.65 116.00 103.21 114.30 138.54 143.75 6 Holiday 88.18 95.71 90.00 95.91 98.33 97.25 7 FMLA 43.97 4.00 11.43 51.10 31.33 25.00 9 Unpaid time 16.08 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 6.00 11 Bereavement 3.94 0.00 0.00 4.12 5.00 3.75 12 Worker's Compensation 12.14 0.00 0.00 9.99 0.00 0.00 50 Wellness time 0.91 1.43 0.00 0.59 0.00 2.50 52 Paid administrative leave 0.06 0.00 0.00 4.71 0.00 0.00 OFF Total hours off per employee per year (total of the 9 time OFF codes)342.26 254.29 240.79 352.45 357.79 311.69 NAWH (THC -OFF)1657.74 1745.71 1759.21 1727.55 1722.21 1768.31 15February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Year:2014 2013 # of individuals included in calculation: 32 6 7 35 7 9 THC Total hours contracted per employee per year (40 hr/wk, 52 wk.yr)2080 2080 2080 2080 2080 2080 4 Sick 52.08 45.13 102.14 69.46 58.86 38.78 5 Vacation 113.59 113.00 121.00 106.67 94.64 107.50 6 Holiday 96.97 93.67 98.57 97.74 97.14 100.00 7 FMLA 12.19 0.00 88.57 23.94 0.00 0.00 9 Unpaid time 11.05 0.00 0.00 5.40 0.00 0.00 11 Bereavement 0.31 0.00 8.57 3.14 0.00 0.00 12 Worker's Compensation 5.34 0.00 0.00 1.14 0.00 0.00 50 Wellness time 0.63 0.00 1.43 0.29 0.00 1.11 52 Paid administrative leave 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 OFF Total hours off per employee per year (total of the 9 time OFF codes)292.46 251.79 420.29 308.19 250.64 247.39 NAWH (THC -OFF)1787.54 1828.21 1659.71 1771.81 1829.36 1832.61 Year:2012 2011 # of individuals included in calculation: 34 8 9 26 7 9 THC Total hours contracted per employee per year (40 hr/wk, 52 wk.yr)2080 2080 2080 2080 2080 2080 4 Sick 59.07 43.72 32.78 57.38 39.46 34.56 5 Vacation 102.79 108.56 130.67 97.30 105.46 124.11 6 Holiday 99.24 98.75 98.56 88.40 89.14 88.89 7 FMLA 14.88 0.00 0.00 8.00 11.43 0.00 9 Unpaid time 7.74 2.50 1.11 2.31 0.00 4.44 11 Bereavement 0.00 0.00 2.89 0.00 2.29 0.00 12 Worker’s Compensation 1.03 0.00 0.00 23.85 0.00 0.00 50 Wellness time 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52 Paid administrative leave 2.65 0.50 3.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 OFF Total hours off per employee per year (total of the 9 time OFF codes)287.69 254.03 269.44 277.24 247.79 252.00 NAWH (THC -OFF)1792.31 1825.97 1810.56 1802.76 1832.21 1828.00 HOURS OF TIME OFF PER MONTH FOR 2014-2016 3,325 2,134 1,749 1,127 2,786 1,866 3,812 2,548 2,786 2,821 5,331 2,779 593 412 295 467 528 651 943 671 673 753 835 429 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PATROL OFFICER SERGEANT 793 499 234 180 466 439 652 350 316 438 780 323 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Average time off per month by rank Relatively high time off for all ranks low time OFF Average time OFF The graphs below show total hours of time-off for all codes in 2014 –2016 (Dec was adjusted to account for partial data from 2016).The time scales in the Corporal and Sergeant graphs are equal,but both are 25%of the scale compared to the Patrol Officer graph.However,this information is intended to demonstrate relative patterns only. January,July and November are high leave months for all ranks,with November’s average time off at 40-60 hours per person each year.August-October tend to be average months for patrol officer leave but corporals take less leave during these months,likely to cover for their sergeants who do.February through June is a relatively long block of months with lower leave. 16February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Seasonal Time-Off Trends for Sworn Staff CORPORALS 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 AM PM DAYS (0700-1700) COVER (1100-2100) SWINGS (1600-0200) GRAVES (2100-0700) Incident group # per year Incident group # per year Crash response 2,453 Citizen assist 650 Burglary and theft 1,487 Domestic violence 648 Alarm calls 1,398 Drunk driver check 636 Welfare check 1,277 Harassment or threat 565 Suspicious situation 1,099 Reckless driver check 518 Traffic problem 835 Neighborhood complaint 512 COPS Workload-Based Assessment Performance-Based Approach to Police Staffing and Allocation.August 2012.Prepared by J.M.Wilson and A.Weiss, Michigan State University,for the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services,US Department of Justice (grant no.2009-CK-WX-K005).and Rockford Police Department:Resource Allocation and Deployment Interim Report. December 2008.The PAR Group,LLC,Lake Bluff,IL. The principal component for this workload-based assessment is citizen-initiated calls for service (CFS).The analysis includes a review of the distribution of calls for service by hour of day,day of week and month;the nature of calls for service including the number requiring more than one officer;and an estimate of the time spent on calls for service. The final staffing estimates are based on these CFS factors,an agency shift relief factor and performance objectives for the amount of time spent on CFS activities.The analysis can model different shift combinations so MPD’s proposed schedule was used to determine the minimum number of required officers. 17February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis 2. Ensure CFS are Citizen-initiated: Top Citizen CFS by Incident Group Traffic is 24% of all CFS 1. Identify Shift Coverage: Current 34% 62% 4% Priority 2P or 3 Priority 2 Priority 1 The number of officers required for citizen CFS needs to be adjusted for calls that require a backup officer.According to CAD, 66%of MPD CFS are priority 2,2P or 3,all of which require at least one additional officer.However,that officer is unlikely to stay for the duration of the call,so total CFS were adjusted up by adding half of the priority calls.This is the same formula used by the Rockford Police Department –one of the four sites used to develop the model. 3. Adjust for Multiple Officer Response: Citizen CFS by Priority 18February 2017 Meridian Police Resource Analysis Modified for multiple officer response Total Time on CFS Officers required to fulfill CFS NO RELIEF (total time/2080)Shift CFS per shift (split when hours overlap) %of priority 2+ (requires more than 1 officer) Total ADJ CFS (CFS + half % for priority) Time per call (average) Total time (hours) Days (0700-1700)5,836 60%7,587 55 min 6,955 3.34 Cover (1100-2100)5,790 64%7,643 51 min 6,497 3.12 Swings (1600-0200)4,521 71%6,126 48 min 4,901 2.36 Graves (2100-0700)2,825 80%3,955 50 min 3,296 1.58 2.2 officers need to be assigned to a shift to make sure one is working any given shift SRF = 365 x shift length (10) (365 x shift length (10) –total time off (2000)) Time On/Off Duty (hours per year) Total leave time (from NAWH)280 Training (10 hr/mo + another 40 hr/yr)160 Regular days off (3 days per wk)1,560 Total time OFF 2,000 5. Calculate Time Spent on Citizen CFS 4. Adjust for Shift Relief Factor: Net Annual Work Hours 6. Identify Citizen CFS Performance Goal 7. Calculate Officers Needed 30% 25% 45% Administrative duties Citizen CFS Officer-initiated contacts Report writing is included as part of administrative duties for the COPS model,so performance goals for citizen CFS and officer-initiated proactive work are lower than in the PAM model.Administrative time is estimated by command staff. CFS @ 25% Shift Multiply officers by 4 Multiply by shift relief 2.2 13.36 30 Days (0700-1700) 12.48 28 Cover (1100-2100) 9.44 21 Swings (1600-0200) 6.32 14 Graves (2100-0700) 93 TOTAL OFFICERS 8. Forecast Future Needs Modified for multiple officer response Total Time on CFS Officers required to fulfill CFS NO RELIEF (total time/2080) CFS Goal 25% Year # CFS per year %w/more than 1 officer Total ADJ CFS per call (average) Total (hours) officers x 4 shift relief x 2.2 2020 25,000 66%33,250 51 min 28,263 13.59 54.36 120 2025 27,250 66%36,243 51 min 30,806 14.81 59.24 131 Patrol Resource Analysis Developed for Meridian Police Department by Amy Harig Aaron, PhD February 2017 16 , 9 1 4 16 , 8 0 6 16 , 8 3 3 16 , 0 4 1 17 , 1 4 5 17 , 6 1 6 19 , 1 4 8 20 , 1 4 8 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 Crashes & CFS +19% Growth in Meridian 73 , 0 4 0 75 , 2 9 0 75 , 0 9 2 76 , 5 1 0 78 , 2 9 0 81 , 3 8 0 85 , 2 4 0 91 , 3 1 0 91 , 4 2 0 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 Population 25 , 2 7 5 26 , 0 4 7 26 , 6 7 4 27 , 1 8 7 27 , 7 7 3 28 , 8 1 4 30 , 2 2 0 31 , 4 6 0 32 , 9 3 2 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 Housing +25%+30% SY S T E M C H A N G E Growth in Meridian 46 47 48 50 52 52 51 52 50 20 0 8 20 0 9 20 1 0 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 Patrol 50 ±4 officers 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Police Incidents OFIN CFS 32% 68% 44% 56% Police Allocation Model (PAM) total # of officers required to deliver patrol and traffic services in Meridian based on… workload requirements performance objectives personnel policies roadway characteristics Center for Public Safety at Northwestern University for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Time-based model crashes & citizen CFS uncommitted patrol administrative duties officer-initiated contacts (reactive) (proactive) Operations Data Model Factor Input Shift length 10 hrs Work week 40 hrs Number of officers per sergeant 7 % of time sergeants should spend on field work 50% Average paid time off per person per year based on Net Annual Work Hours analysis for 2011-2016 280 hrs Average on-duty training time per year 10 hrs per month shift overlap + additional 40 hrs per year 160 hrs Roadway Data Model Factor Arterial Collector Local Miles of roadway 2014 data 131.6 19.4 385.1 Average uncommitted patrol speed estimate based on speed limit 45 mph 25 mph 20 mph Performance Goal for Visibility Patrol frequency once a week Patrol frequency every 2 hours Patrol frequency twice a week Arterial Collector Local Workload Data Crash response (CRASH) •accident and hit-and-run incident types regardless of call source Other citizen calls for service (CFS OTHER) •non-administrative incidents other than crashes with call source = 9 & T Officer-initiated, proactive contacts (OFIN) •non-administrative incidents other than crashes with call source = R Years Included in Model 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Police Incidents OFIN CFS Year Officer- initiated CFS 2013 33,332 17,616 2014 29,347 19,148 2015 25,605 20,148 Workload Data Model Factor CRASH CFS OTHER OFIN Total incidents per year 2,453 16,518 29,428 Average time on call 1 hour 50 min 20 min % with a report 64%24%5% Average time to write report 30 min 40 min 40 min % with a backup officer 81%64%84% Performance Goal for Proactivity 15% 30%55% Administrative activities Crashes and other CFS Officer-initiated contacts PAM Recommendation 73 Total 9 sergeants 64 corporals & officers •Officers dedicated to patrol and traffic services Police Allocation Model (PAM) total # of officers required to deliver patrol and traffic services in Meridian based on… workload requirements performance objectives personnel policies roadway characteristics Center for Public Safety at Northwestern University for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Comparison to Other Models COPS Workload-Based Assessment based on citizen-initiated calls for service -total number, time spent on CFS, and the ideal percent of officer time that should be dedicated to them Shift # CFS per year %w/>1 officer Avg time on call Adjust for 25% CFS goal x 4 Adjust for shift relief x 2.2 Total officers Days 5,836 60%55 min 30 Cover 5,790 64%51 min 28 Swings 4,521 71%48 min 21 Graves 2,825 80%50 min 14 Comparison to Other Models Benchmark Cities Officers per 1,000 2014 Average = 1.45 officers/1,000 Comparison to Other Models Benchmark Cities Officers per 1,000 Officers per 1,000 # of officer positions (all ranks excluding Lieutenant) Patrol CID SRO Total Current 1.05 66 19 11 96 Target 1.45 95 27 11 133 Calculated with COMPASS 2016 population 91,420 Comparison to Other Models Model •2017 PAM •73 COPS •93 Benchmark •95 PAM Forecast 2020 and 2025 1.Update # crashes, other CFS and officer- initiated contacts •Average incident rate per category with COMPASS Communities in Motion 2040 population forecast 2.Update miles of roadway •Increase by proportion based on COMPASS Communities in Motion 2040 households forecast: Local roads = same proportion, collectors = half and arterials = one-third 3.Maintain all other model inputs PAM Forecast 88 Total 11 sgts 77 officers 95 Total 12 sgts 83 officers Comparison to Other Models Model •2017 •2020 •2025 PAM •73 •88 •95 COPS •93 •120 •131 Benchmark •95 •98 •112 40 �- CD 00 N 0') O 17 V! L6 C\lco a) a) (n U) cu E I,- r -,Lo OC) (D 00 CY) 1 CN LO 0 (.0 0010! (D o 00 o c) Lo C:) C:) i't, Cl) C) C\l M LO 0 — ro 1,q- (.0 't �G) - C) w I I , cu -I olco 't �(O cl) 00; LO (N (Y) 0 M — CO — cy) LO ht, V- tt -.1 -oo 0 r co '(D Zq U) "t 'o , (D m cq U> Cl) a) C14 q N _7 U) C) co En N 4) 4) CD E Q L) 00 dLn cu M M -i x -i 0 o Lo Lo 0) 0)(O Lo 0) 0) C) C) LO 00 C14 CO CO '0 C> a) CD LO I Lo CD 't r-- (o CD U) a I- C> (D CO I- Lo C, r 'IT It LO ;4 C14 ce) 't LO 00 0) 0 cli O C) C) cy) CD LO (D'oo;— OC3 7 00 cl) c) Lo C) NC\[ C) C) 0(O 0) 0 N, M! 04 CD (Y) CD CN Lo i (o Lo N r C14 (7) LO (0 00 (0 N C) C14 OSLO 14 N LO -T! r -I 0 C14 0 CD rN (n co c); ce) CD Cl) -0 CY) cu I o M OF cu 0 LL E(n M < 0) 00 cl) C) i LOj LO LO C'41 0 t 0) C) C) 00; LOO C) CN! 0! 0 OD C) C) I (D 00 LO LOi "t i - CN 0 C.4 C) 04 It C) 00 cr) c) Lo C) 0) tr3 CT N IW N 2 CL > o El �2 (D CL 211-2 d) C3) c: C: 91! 0) C: m I (L) a) w 0 tr, 0, 2 -2 E C: =3 , a. 0) 0 El 0 r E U) X '0 1 2 m E 12 (v oi a),l o a) :� m z CK Ix :E LL �(DLR ol m o C) , lo Lu w (L (L U) ! CO LL w o > C) C) C) C)'CO (0 0 Ce) C) (D C) C\l a)'CO'O 04 C) OD'(D C) C) 04 N C) (D LO LO ;,q ),i O C) CD ;-tu) 00 00f010 ":r co ,t; 1 co! r, (D 0) 00 04 1- c) C) co coC\l rl to (n fn C: oi— C: a) U) aN a), 'r- I CU > a)0 cu W� 0 C a) < co, U - w C: tp� E M Co cu Q. CU, 0 :3CL 0. cc tp E (n c: > E Lo 0) In 0 N : .2 E L) 1.2- m o) cn� < 2� 0 a) a) C: ? c 0 2 cu; Er CL a- c > > CL C) 0 o C: a)j (U a) -�V- i Z i LLJ N -L a)[ L, & (D j_- a) -j (D '21 0 < CL a) LM ca _0 0 a) -0 E2� . a -t f m 0 :3 c -,0)0) a o � E! r- c: 16 CL i im 0 C', 2) a) 0 2 .2 a) i -�j 00i 'XI:2 a) E �,r- - 8 'E -5� 0 o - E M 0 o -a 0; a) C: 6515� 2 UL ,: :3 a) co 0 =5 0 c w F 212 T� w'- ol q)� o LLI(J.R CL U) Co Ll- �F z 0� WIM -1 2 < �l 05 1.s 83 co) :� C), 0 w w 1 CL o m M Cr 4) 2 0 LL a- CK m < o 40 �- CD 00 N 0') O 17 V! L6 C\lco a) a) (n U) cu E E 2 0 co 4) 12 - ,m "-- 2 a I w w I I , cu -I C14 le LO O ca FY ,It LO < -.1 -oo 0 r co '(D Zq U) "t 'o , (D m cq U> Cl) a) C14 q N _7 U) C) co E E 4) 4) CD E Q L) 00 dLn cu M M -i x -i 40 �- CD 00 N 0') O 17 V! L6 C\lco a) a) (n U) cu E E 2 0 co 4) 12 - ,m "-- 2 a I w w I I , cu m 0 0) w O ca O.0 < -.1 -oo 0 a) — F, CD; (N It 00 C), 0) tl- C) T 00( (N 1 N C\l 0) C) U) CD C\I;' cl) CO 0 IT LO IT 0 co 4) 12 - ,m "-- 2 a I w w I I , cu CL a a) (Dc (L >, >, a) U) (D 0 mo u 2 - CU 4) 2 a) U) -i (L U) co '(D Zq N co �o, < C\jco U) "t 'o , (D m cq U> Cl) a) C14 q N _7 U) C) co E E E CD L) L) OR '0 — F, CD; (N It 00 C), 0) tl- C) T 00( (N 1 N C\l 0) C) U) CD C\I;' cl) CO 0 IT LO IT (D (1) — CO N I-- r- 0 CO C) 0) co co Nr Cl) C\l 0 D- C6 U) U) O C) C) LD 0) "T CO C:) CV)' C) C) (Y> CY) N (D (y) C) (0 OD 0 CV) 1 (N 0 00 04 CN V CD (l) OR 0 o Lo Lo 0) 0)(O Lo 0) 0) C) C) LO 00 C14 CO CO '0 C> a) CD LO I Lo CD 't r-- (o CD U) a I- C> (D CO I- Lo C, r 'IT It LO ;4 C14 ce) 't LO 00 0) 0 cli O CL CY) cu I o M cu 0 LL E(n M < CroL 0 E! a CL o 0 a) 2 a) tr3 CT N IW N 2 CL > o El �2 (D CL 211-2 d) C3) c: C: 91! 0) C: m I (L) a) w 0 tr, 0, 2 -2 E C: =3 , a. 0) 0 El 0 r E U) X '0 1 2 m E 12 (v oi a),l o a) :� m z CK Ix :E LL �(DLR ol m o C) , lo Lu w (L (L U) ! CO LL w o Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9B PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Police Department: Consolidated Records Management System Agreement MEETING NOTES 36 WIDIED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS RENEWAL AND MODIFICATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO FOR A CONSOLIDATED RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS) – PAGE 1 AGREEMENT NO. 10592-4-17 RENEWAL AND MODIFICATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO FOR A CONSOLIDATED RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS) THIS RENEWAL AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT is entered into this ______ day of _______________, 2017, by and between the City of Boise, on behalf of the Boise Police Department (BPD), Ada County, on behalf of the Ada County Sheriff’s Office (ACSO), and the City of Meridian, on behalf of the Meridian Police Department (MPD) (hereinafter collectively “Parties”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Parties entered into Ada County Agreement No. 10592 for consolidated records management on December 17, 2013 (hereinafter “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, said Agreement ended on September 30, 2014; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was renewed as Agreement No. 10592-1-15 for the period beginning October 1, 2014, through September 30, 2015; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was renewed as Agreement No. 10592-2-15 for the period beginning October 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was renewed as Agreement No. 10592-3-16 for the period beginning April 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that New World Systems Corporation, which provided the Aegis MSP software system design, installation and support for the consolidated records management, was acquired by Tyler Technologies, Inc. that assumed the maintenance and support for the consolidated records management that is the subject of the Agreement; WHEREAS, it is now the mutual intent of the Parties to renew said Agreement for an additional nine-month term. The County has approved the FY 17 budget and appropriated the amount required for the contract payments payable under this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, this Agreement does renew Agreement No. 10592 for the period beginning January 1, 2017 through September 30, 2017, including Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. 1. The “Payment for Maintenance and Technical Support Services” paragraph in Exhibit A is modified to read as follows: The cost of the “Maintenance and Support Agreement” between Ada County and Tyler Technologies, Inc. for the period from January 1, 2017, to September 30, RENEWAL AND MODIFICATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO FOR A CONSOLIDATED RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS) – PAGE 2 2017, is $124,644.00. This cost will be apportioned between the City of Boise Police and Ada County Sheriff’s Office in the same percent as in the previous agreements, with the exception that Meridian Police will not have a reimbursement obligation; and the City of Boise Police and Ada County Sheriff’s Office will evenly split the prior 15% Meridian Police obligation, as follows: a. City of Boise Police - $81,641.82 (65.5%). b. Ada County Sheriff’s Office - $43,002.18 (34.5%). 2. City of Boise is not requesting reimbursement for IT Hardware, Software Maintenance, or Professional Services. 3. The Parties will make the payments outlined above directly to Tyler Technologies, Inc. at: Tyler Technologies, Inc. 840 West Long Lake Road Troy, MI 48098 IT IS FURTHER AGREED that this modification is effective as of the 1st day of January, 2017 and that all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not in any way be modified, changed, altered, or amended by this Renewal Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. Board of Ada County Commissioners B y : David L. Case, Commissioner B y : Jim Tibbs, Commissioner B y : Rick Visser, Commissioner ATTEST: Christopher D. Rich, Ada County Clerk ADA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Date Stephen Bartlett Ada County Sheriff Approved as to foriu: Joseph Mallet Chief Legal Advisor to the Sheriff CITY OF BOISE Date David H. Bieter Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF M R AN _--_ Date By: Tammy De Werd - Mayor �o�Pz�,a nucuyrr � ATTES- : �a City of CA C ly Clerkw SE Ar RENEWAL AND MODIFICA r'� RGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO FOR A CONSOLIDATED RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS) — PAGE 3 RENEWAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO – EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.Definitions: Data: For purposes of this Agreement, data shall be any piece of digital information produced by the agency that has been converted from the legacy system (IBM AS/400), or created, collected, input, and subsequently stored on the RMS while that agency is a party to this Agreement, including but not limited to Incident Tracking System (ITS) information and National Incident-Based Reporting Standards (NIBRS) information. Failover: Backup operational mode in which designated functions of a system are assumed by secondary system components when the primary component becomes unavailable through a major system failure, thus ensuring a mission-critical system is always available. Level of Authority: Level of access assigned to each user’s account in order to access data within the RMS system. Records Management System: Consolidated and collaborative system comprised of data and related work processes for collecting, storing, and sharing public safety information, including police and sheriff department records pertinent to all parties covered under this Agreement. 2.Coordination and Communication among the Agencies: a.Application Administrator:Each agency shall designate both a primary and backup Application Administrator to maintain the RMS application and provide those persons’ names, titles, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses to the other groups listed in this Paragraph. It will be the role of the Application Administrator to assign a user ID, log-ins, and passwords for each user within his agency. b.Business Rules/Processes Board Member:Each agency shall designate a Business Rules/Processes Member, who will be responsible for providing input and establishing standard business processes and standard configuration of RMS for continuity of usage across all agencies, and provide that person’s name, title, address, phone number, and email address to the other groups listed in this Paragraph. c.Notification Groups:Each agency shall maintain a standard list of contacts to which communication will be made regarding scheduled system down-time, emergency system down-time, and/or status of reported issues. d.Executive Committee:The governing board presiding over the RMS system and processes, comprised of a representative from each agency as designated by each agency’s chief law enforcement officer or designee and convening only as needed to provide general agency direction to the Steering Committee and/or RMS Project Manager. e.RMS Project Manager: The Steering Committee members shall designate a Project Manager as needed for the planning and coordinating of future implementations (expansions) of RMS and provide that person’s name, title, address, phone number, and email address to the other groups listed in this Paragraph. RENEWAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO – EXHIBIT A f.Steering Committee Member: Each agency shall designate a Steering Committee Member, who will be responsible for directly addressing issues identified by the Project Manager and guiding the Project Manager with regard to future RMS implementations and on-going support, and provide that person’s name, title, address, phone number, and email address to the other groups listed in this Paragraph. It will be function of the Steering Committee Member to identify the RMS users in his agency and document each user’s level of authority and security profile and to coordinate with the Application Administrator, who will assign user ID’s, log-ins, and passwords. g.Technology Advisory Board Member: Each agency shall designate one of its IT employees as a Technology Advisory Member, who will be responsible for providing technology advice to the Steering Committee, Business Rules/Processes Board, and Project Manager, and provide that person’s name, title, address, phone number, and email address to the other groups listed in this Paragraph. If, after the designated individuals have been named from each agency, any agency wishes to subsequently change its aforementioned candidate(s), the agency must notify all of the other groups listed above in writing, by means of the notification groups. This is critical to ensure all appropriate parties are kept informed of activities impacting the use of RMS. 3.Procedures for New Implementations: If a new implementation is needed, the Steering Committee will designate a Project Manager, who, along with the Steering Committee will work with the assigned project manager from New World Systems, the licensor of the Aegis MSP software suite, to develop an implementation schedule and timeline. The Project Manager will keep the agencies informed of project progress, the anticipated cost of the initiative, and of any decisions to modify the schedule. The parties should cooperate as required for the efficient and prompt completion of tasks. 4.City of Boise Police Department Responsibilities: a.Serve as the agency hosting Aegis MSP RMS on behalf of Ada County for all agencies formerly served by Ada County as listed herein. b.Provide annual estimates, percentage adjustments, and invoices to each agency for annual maintenance and support for services provided by City of Boise Information Technology resources as described in Exhibit B “Costs and Payments.” c.Acquire and work with third party vendors as may be required to provide the services described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, not provided by New World Systems. d.Provide, maintain, and publish the process for other agencies to report technical support issues to the City of Boise Help-Desk as described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 7. e.Provide and coordinate ongoing maintenance and technical support services to other agencies within the scope described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 7. f.Provide storage of all agencies’ RMS data as required for record retention pursuant to applicable Idaho statutes. Storage requirements will be assessed annually prior to Agreement renewal and associated increased will be included in Exhibit B “Costs and Payments.” RENEWAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO – EXHIBIT A g.Keep other agencies informed of issues reported to City of Boise and of technical issues reported by City of Boise to New World Systems by utilizing the common Notification Group identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 2. 5.Individual Participating Agency Responsibilities: a. Provide project management services as the need arises based upon the selection of the project manager as agreed upon by all agencies. b. Assign the following resources: primary and backup Application Administrator, Business Rules/Process Board member, Steering Committee member, and a Technology Advisory Board member to function as described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 2. c. The Steering Committee member shall identify those members of his/her agency who will be users of the RMS. The level of authority and security profile for each user from each agency will be documented by the Steering Committee member within each agency. The Steering Committee Member shall coordinate with the applicable Application Administrator who will assign a user ID/log-ins and passwords for each user within their respective agency. d. Immediately report to the Application Administrator when a RMS user ceases to use RMS, or leaves the employment for any reason, in order to inactivate the user account in RMS. The Application Administrator will inform the agency Steering Committee member of the account that has been inactivated. e. Immediately report to the agency’s IT Department, through the support request process shown in Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, when an RMS user ceases to use RMS, or leaves employment for any reason, in order for the RMS client software to be removed from the user’s machine if applicable. f. Immediately report to the City of Boise Help-Desk, through the support request process shown in Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, when an RMS user ceases to use RMS, or leaves the employment of the agency for any reason, in order for City of Boise IT to remove any associated account from the applicable remote access servers. g. Ensure that all users only use the RMS for valid law enforcement and public safety purposes, according to law and defined procedures. h. Promptly report any suspected security breaches to the Application Administrator. i. Handle requests for release of records in accordance with Exhibit A, Paragraph 6, and as required by law. j. Ensure that all data entered onto the RMS shall adhere to “Data Entry Standard Procedures” to be established by the Business Rules/Process Board; the agency Application Administrator shall be responsible to ensure all users of that agency adhere to the standards. k. Acquire, maintain and administer necessary hardware equipment and desktop software applications necessary for accessing the RMS from the agency’s local site. l. Provide the agency’s own local network connection capable of communicating effectively with the RMS on the City of Boise network. m. Ensure agency’s own underlying technology, including GIS data, is kept current so as not to hinder or impede usage of the RMS by other agencies. RENEWAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO – EXHIBIT A n. Handle technical problems at the local level including local connectivity issues, report unresolved problems according to Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, and follow all instructions given by the technical support service providers of New World Systems and/or City of Boise IT, as applicable. o. Request technical assistance from the City of Boise IT Department by following the support request process as described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 7. p. Maintain the agency’s applicable software license, maintenance, and support contracts as may be required to continue to meet the purposes of this Agreement through FY15 and for each renewal year thereafter. 6.Security and Release of RMS Data: a. All data converted from the legacy system (IBM AS/400), or created, collected, input, and subsequently stored on the RMS shall be the sole property of the agency that produced the data, with each agency granting to each other consent to use and review the data only for lawful law enforcement purposes and in accordance with other procedures described herein. Each agency shall be responsible for responding to Idaho public records requests (PRRs), and any other requests made to said agency to view, access, or release agency’s own data. Access to data on the RMS is limited to the parties to the Agreement. If a request is made of one agency for release of data of another agency, the requestor shall be directed to the party that produced that data. b. Agencies shall retain the ability to secure data, documents, photos and audio as deemed necessary for investigative integrity. 7.Maintenance and Technical Support Services: Maintenance. The City of Boise shall: a.Provide and maintain the PRODUCTION Aegis MSP software system and in the optimal configuration as designated by New World Systems. b.Provide and maintain the TEST/TRAINING Aegis MSP software system and in the optimal configuration as designated by New World Systems. c.Install Aegis MSP software upgrades as made available by New World Systems or otherwise permit New World Systems to install upgrades consistent with the standard software maintenance agreement with Ada County. d.Ensure City of Boise’s contributions to GIS data are kept current, and that all agencies’ GIS data are aggregated and made available in the RMS so as not to hinder or impede usage of the RMS by the other agencies. e.Using the Notification Group, coordinate scheduled system down-time in advance. f.Using the Notification Group, notify agency contacts in the event of an emergency or otherwise unplanned, system downtime event. g.Perform backups of both Production and Test/Training data on a nightly, and incremental, backup schedule. h.Provide Storage Area Network (SAN) for secure storage of data records and associated record attachments of all file format types with the exception of video RENEWAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO – EXHIBIT A files. Note: Attachments are only possible via the desktop client remote access (not possible through Citrix). i.Provide a failover system that will allow an alternate location to access data in the event the primary location is unavailable for a period of greater than eight (8) hours. NOTE: The failover process may require an 8-hour time period to execute, and only data will be available (attachments are NOT included in the failover location). j.Provide the backup and failover technology in a separate, secure geographic location other than the location of primary production and test/training environments. k.Provide a copy of the data, if requested, by any agency terminating its participation in the Agreement. l.Provide a high speed wide-area network connection physically located between all agencies from the production, test/training, and failover environments to the point of local network connection at the other agency locations. m.Maintain and provide technical support for the designated method of remote access currently provided by Citrix software. Note: Uploads/attachments are NOT possible directly from local drives or external storage devices (PC, flash drives, any other external device); uploads/attachments are only possible through the local client installation. n.Provide to agencies instructions for Citrix remote access installation. o.Provide to agencies instructions for the Aegis MSP desktop client installation. p.Maintain all software licenses, maintenance, and support contracts associated with required third party vendors, such as Citrix. Technical Support Services. The City of Boise shall provide the following types of technical support after proper internal triage process has occurred as described in Figure 1: a. Help-Desk services b. Desk-top support services c. Network administration d. Server administration e. Application administration f. Database administration g. Development services h. GIS services i. After-hours emergency support j. Contact with the New World Systems vendor RENEWAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO – EXHIBIT A Figure 1 – Multi-Agency Issue Reporting Process: The Multi-Agency Issue Reporting Process is described as follows: Level 1 Support – Application Administrator: An RMS user experiencing an issue shall report the issue first to the agency’s Application Administrator, who shall first rule out any process/procedural issues. If the Application Administrator is unable to resolve the issue, it is escalated to Level 2 - the agency’s internal IT staff. See note under Level 4 that describes if the Application Administrator determines at this point the issue is a New World Systems’ support issue, the Application Administrator may contact the vendor directly to report the issue. Level 2 Support – Agency’s internal IT staff: The Application Administrator shall report the issue to the agency’s internal IT staff, who shall first attempt to resolve all local hardware, software issues, and/or local area network issues. If the agency’s internal IT staff is unable to resolve the issue, it is escalated to Level 3. See note under Level 4 that describes if the agency’s internal IT staff determines at this point the issue is a New World Systems’ support issue, the agency’s internal IT staff may contact the vendor directly to report the issue. Level 3 Support – City of Boise Help-Desk: The Application Administrator or agency IT staff shall report the issue to the City of Boise Help- Desk by phoning 384-3767 during normal business hours, after-hours, and on weekends; the Help-Desk will triage the issue and assign it to the appropriate Boise IT personnel, who will then work with the reporting agency until resolved. If the City of Boise IT staff is unable to resolve the issue, staff will escalate the issue to Level 4, New World Systems technical support. See note under Level 4 that describes if the City of Boise IT staff determines at this point the issue is RENEWAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO – EXHIBIT A a New World Systems’ support issue, the City of Boise IT staff may contact the vendor directly to report the issue. Level 4 Support – New World Systems technical support: Any of the three previous levels of support shall escalate the issue directly to New World Systems if it is determined at that level that the issue requires vendor assistance to resolve. If this option is pursued by any previous level of support, the reporting entity must utilize the Notification Group to advise all other agencies that an issue has been reported to the vendor and subsequently to advise all other agencies when the issue has been resolved. After Hours Support. The Aegis MSP system has been classified as an URGENT system, which is any system that, when inoperable, causes disruption to services being rendered to the public. Systems in this class must be repaired within a reasonable amount of time. The City of Boise IT Department’s normal operating hours are from 7AM to 5PM Monday through Friday. After Hours support will be from 5PM to 7AM the following day. Weekends and holidays are considered after hours support 24/7. After hours contact should be made by phoning 384-3767. A Help-Desk representative will be available to answer the call 24/7. If for some reason, the call is missed, a return phone call will be made within 15 minutes from receiving the first voice mail. If the issue cannot be resolved within a half an hour by this first point of contact, the issue will be escalated to tier 3 support (IT specialist). The IT specialist shall begin troubleshooting no later than 3 hours from being dispatched by the Help-Desk and subsequently remain engaged until the issue is resolved. Note: Boise City holidays include: Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King/Human Rights Day, Presidents Day, Independence Day, and Labor Day, and one other floating holiday. Exception: Portions of fiber within the wide area network between agencies are dependent upon the Ada County Highway District (ACHD); disruptions in network connectivity created by an outside entity such as ACHD are beyond the control of the City of Boise; however, City of Boise IT will work with, and/or remain in contact with, such entity until the issue is resolved. City of Boise IT will publish to the Notification Group periodic progress reports until the issue is resolved. NOTE: A window of down-time will, from time to time, be required in order to perform routine, planned maintenance on the RMS (i.e. apply service packs, upgrades). Notification regarding scheduled down-time will be published in advance to the Notification Group. If technical support calls are received during scheduled down-time, the calls will be logged and users notified when the service is back up and running. Payment for Maintenance and Technical Support Services. The maintenance and technical support services described above shall be funded by the agencies, according to Exhibit B “Costs and Payments.” Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9C PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Police Department: Memorandum of Understanding between Boise Police, Garden City Police and City of Meridian Police MEETING NOTES rpt APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU), made this 161th day of February, 2017, by and between the Boise Police Department, the Garden City Police Department, and the Meridian Police Department, is entered into for the purpose of granting authority to officers in each agency to exercise peace officer authority in the jurisdiction of the other agencies, commonly referred to as cross-deputization. RECITALS WHEREAS, the Boise Police Department, the Garden City Police Department, and the Meridian Police Department have previously entered into an agreement on August 12, 1998 and June 4, 2002, providing for cross-deputization of each agency's officers for mutual aid; and WHEREAS, the Boise Police Department, the Garden City Police Department, and the Meridian Police Department agree that it is necessary and desirable to continue that agreement; and WHEREAS, the Boise Police Department, the Garden City Police Department, and the Meridian Police Department agree that the previous agreement should be updated to reflect current policies and to ensure that it continues to benefit the citizens of the involved communities. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions and the recitals set forth above, the Boise Police Department, the Garden City Police Department, and the Meridian Police Department understand as follows: UNDERSTANDING CONDITIONS OF AUTHORIZATION It is intended that in situations where police action is necessary or should otherwise be taken, each agency is authorized to respond and take appropriate police action within the jurisdiction of the others. It is agreed that police officers of the Boise Police Department, Garden City Police Department, and the Meridian Police Department be granted lawful authority to exercise the powers of police officers within the jurisdictions of the others. All POST -certified full-time paid employees of the Garden City Police Department and the Meridian Police Department are hereby appointed and deputized by the Boise Police Chief as Special Police inside the City of Boise, with full jurisdiction within Boise city limits. This appointment is pursuant to Boise City Code § 3-01-04. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - 1 All POST -certified full-time paid employees of the Boise Police Department and the Meridian Police Department are hereby appointed and deputized by the Garden City Police Chief as Special Police inside the City of Garden City, with full jurisdiction within the city limits of Garden City. This appointment is pursuant Garden City Code § 1-8- 3.C. All POST -certified full-time paid employees of the Boise Police Department and the Garden City Police Department are hereby appointed and deputized by the Meridian City Police Chief as Special Police inside the City of Meridian, with full jurisdiction within the Meridian city limits. This appointment is pursuant Meridian City Code § 6-1-7. With the exception of cases involving the Critical Incident Task Force (CITF) the criminal investigative unit of each agency shall have primary jurisdiction for follow-up investigation of crimes committed within the corporate limits of that agency's city. Each agency within this MOU may follow-up on crimes that originated within the corporate limits of their jurisdiction, even though such follow-up may include investigation within the corporate limits of any of the jurisdictions. If an investigation discloses any crime committed within the corporate limits of one of the other agencies, the officer leading the investigation will immediately notify the other agency's detective unit and cooperate with that other agency. Thereafter, the follow-up and investigation will be the responsibility of the agency that has primary jurisdiction. STANDARD OF CONDUCT Each police officer shall maintain standards of professional conduct required by the officer's current departmental policies and procedures. It shall be the sole duty and responsibility of an officer's employing agency to determine if there has been a breach of professional standards. Each agency shall have the responsibility to notify its officers of restrictions of jurisdiction or peace officer status due to a breach of professional standards, or other action that would limit peace officer authority for the officer. Where an officer -involved shooting, a deadly force incident, or critical incident occurs involving one or more of the agencies involved, CITF shall be automatically activated and the CITF Agreement shall be subscribed to by all participating agencies. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - 2 MEDIA RELEASES As a general guideline, media information on all cases for which this MOU is controlling will be a shared task with the primary jurisdiction assuming a lead role. However, this guideline in not intended to limit any one of the agencies from describing or withholding information regarding their participation in the situation. Whenever possible, the participating agencies will consult with one another prior to all media releases on such cases. IV. LIABILITY Assumption of liability shall be as prescribed by Idaho Code § 67-2337(4), as well as any other state of federal laws consistent with Idaho Code § 67-2337. The employing agency shall be responsible for, and assume any liability arising from, the acts of its employees participating in police actions regardless of which jurisdiction is the point of occurrence. V. AMENDMENT, DURATION, AND TERMINATION OF UNDERSTANDING This MOU may be amended by agreement of all parties. This agreement shall remain in full force and effect until terminated upon thirty (30) days written notice by any party. Notice shall be by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. The effective date of such notice shall be three (3) days after the date of posting with the United States Postal Service. Such notice shall be sent to the Chief of Police of each participating agency. Entered in this 16th day of February, 2017, by the cities of Boise, Garden City, and Meridian, Idaho. C I Y',�O F B E 4 ' Davi Bie er Mayor DATE Attest: 3/i3/1-7 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - 3 BOISEITY PO ICE DEPARTMENT F William L. Bones Chief of Police DATE: lo' - 7 CITY OF G�P yDEN CIT I�) rayoG. Evans r DATE: I/17 Attest: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tarn," -,1_e Weerd Mayor DATE: 2-11lir 7 Attest: �5��,�pa AUGusp rGU city of MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - 4 GARDEN C4TY POLICE DEPARTMENT Rick APen Chief of Police DATE: MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT DATE: -Z '/- 1-1? C) / 7 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 9D PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Parks and Recreation: FY2017 Budget Amendment for Movie Night Projector Purchase Not -to -Exceed $10,000 MEETING NOTES r_. Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE; E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS 0 ° z z- �f ❑ 41 41OEl O z� � N Z dd �j vOi aC OC ❑ ❑ F� p u c c it CU u a u u u o M d d Y Y N 0 U N Ocl Q ►y L �- L E Ln 'O to iM O a off. t to aL E 4o LU W I a` ui (u Ii a� DIV, . s E E 4° 3 ws N N \ � t a z z Z Z E C: cc v v a v o E E L � a p a a� o w Lczy j 7 -0cr_ LU L- E O '++ C ~ n G � L 7 U O LL OJ J U 0 L a O to N U' 4 O V U- � on +f6 -r a c 0 zx $ N � Z aci E ° N v 0 y 0 CJ " cU cu O' s v pcp E E IH N v � a p a a� o w Lczy j 7 -0cr_ LU L- E O '++ C ~ n G � L 7 U O LL OJ J U 0 L a E F7 0 0 Ldv C C O N M. C N 2 O Lu N l7 O to N U O V U- � c 312 a c zx TJ# Z yOa Z Z Z o 0 0 y 0 CJ " cU v Q s v O N E E IH N v a O tvo vvi v ° le n. > c 0 a O O i a� w C 0 0 L 00000000 44 c; L w U p 'A i �. wt O l0 O d' ci N M Ln O N O N 11 N O m N O N O N O N O ci rf ci V 11 '* 1-1 cF N -1 N * N d' N d' O O O O O O O O N cA N ci N `-1 N 'A N H N c-1 N 11 N H 1n In In In In 1n Ln In ci ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E F7 0 0 Ldv C C O N M. C N 2 O Lu N l7 O to O U- zx TJ# Z yOa Z Z Z is d 4 o 0 y 0 CJ " N U1 s IH W 0 C 0 0 L � 44 c; L w U p 'A i �. wt L _ E .c 0 Q 3 _ � 5g ,;'� a �E 0 F— C c Y Z O7 0 Z O o/ M v 0 li o 0 o 0 o o 0 o 0 o o o O ci y ' ev O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N ci N N N r1 N N N N N ci Ln In Ln In Ln v� In Ln In Ln 1n Ln In In Ln In v� Ln Ln �n in In ui 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N T C W ho c m G V 0 O1 Q CL 0 Y 0 0 441. tA O A a 0 T to U- zx TJ# Z yOa Z Z Z is d 4 o y 0 CJ " N U1 s W 3 a C " L � 44 c; L w U p 'A i �. wt L _ E .c 0 Q 3 _ � 5g ,;'� a �E 0 F— C W ho c m G V 0 O1 Q CL 0 Y 0 0 441. tA O A a 0 T A L a co M m n O a M � O N 0 U N In LL .li vl: i 1 1 L �a cu am U ON MA LL lt4 Q ai ho C G 0 i c Q a ;° H a O U H W a yt € o L IF O b +-•` o += #� f6O p bn :° orq N u L CO2 u 12 (9 Q to C v E tv O Y O CLT$ E bO O � >' a U 0 c t , � YO 72h 3 L -0 E us E N Q T ho � € O g� OJ Ln u 0- of h (hD N •C Cl N R .. 0 C > € O 41 m z �O fr L c ?� O ff O L k Y O uE L Q O1 N a) L (U s Q. D1 v- Q€ g O 3 U c m 3 0 o air hq -a ~ Q a) u cu v T cu w c `—° s n= v aj u l7 ZO a ho C OLs m On v CL 3 c o m 3 F h g O wv- y O c€ 3 0 O au E w L u g L� O CL c +' aci c C ahi OCL 0 n a, o m 3 O 3€ „ > cu V) u € air, C VJ a w N � ++ .N N L vOi c a as y L Q �' m_ m Ln ho > ca co L C O a O y c VI m O ahi °c°[ c a} �.vj m n a o w E v�- o 40 cE v 3 �.. #€ c c > 9 Q w N C O w ¢ N v 6 a E c m In a +tet v I E N N h C -0 x 3 Q °' tO r .� h0 O €. O u 4 Y O€ O +� a O O N O E 3 a. -0h1 }1 L {..� y._ t O L 3 -0 C >' c -a E V 3 +� c �o ta °° o 0 o - 41 C `° =3 �a�i .0 o a '0 m °1 bi M o a E O 3 ..0 K ._ O U1 y 3 v 'Ep N >; � � a � 0) a 3 ' aa) I a, E iE i (U L) CL � v E v o � � Y M a 0 v Ix 0 N i p a� d p +� u C�0 moi' E Ln Z .0-4_._.... _ Y M O_ N 4c C N 0 E to T O c v N E O a O C N O. O .c L0 b4 C i6 c N Q h m C 0 N 4C Y w c 0 L ro a c O U 3 O T L 3 Y t H A L 3O I RDvd URMIuoy dlHsuosNodS M Q T.HoiN urnoN .uulppow ul Ig IN atn0W HMO alquo rlaua It, A.md ssallloS ut �Culdslp luuorloutosd o do las lour TosuodS •upippow ul Ig IN alnoN TIO olgoD goua It, aapin VutuToolam agI 2fulmolloi lsnopuosq soj 'uotlusnp ul spuooas (0£) XITIgI'TosuodS Vutaouroid lumuasil,Tanpu Oapin (I) auo aptno.rd htu ,rosuodS £ saatnsas puu slanpold sapinosd It garrtnn sol s0rT02alp3ssaursnq agI ul Rarnrsnjm drgs,tosuods of polilluo oq hugs sosuodS 'uulplTaW ut Ig2IN alnoW E[NO olgeD of sy •Z «'uulptraW ut I1191N OIAOW F[MO algt30„ so poomojot oq ducts salsas Iuana Ig$IN arnoN Taurtuns rf1400nn s<SIID 'suorluluasasd puu stnr,talvw Iuuorloward llu uI'Itlowoa-MV stgI jo uopusnp aqI soj puu Iosluoo s,fillD Jo S*U11 agI uIgIlAk I :apnloul llogs luomoojiiy stgl jo miol agI lnogVnoagl TosuodS of jur.rnut Sig uaq'gons sV •salsas Iuana Ig2IN arnOW MUMS X13103m s,,flra3o TosuodS a[lty agI'su pozrugoaaa oq hugs pup 'aq Ilugs TosuodS'luotua;mVV stgl jo wol aqI Inog2nosgy 'dii1mosuodS allly .d 2IOSNods':Io s.11lrllHISNOam aNV S,I.HOIu •I :smoltol so aa.&I TosuodS puu XjjD lumiq polmod,mut mu gotgm'anoqu slullow Ott) Jo uolln.raprsuoo ul put,'poutuluoo ularaq siuuuanoo puu sosluto•rd Iunlntu agI 3o uotluTaptsuoo ul pup 'poojVo pup po2p0lmouj3U Kga.Taq sr gotgm jo SouaroWns pup ldlaoaT aril 'uorinsaplsaoo alquntnn put; pool .roj `aHogg2IlHy �AtON .aNO olgeD gllm IuaatowWV sigl olut ,slug of umpla0Wj0 AILD 041 jo lsa.talut Isaq agI ul 81 11 Ipgl sPuli uplptsaiN jo XiID aqI jo Irounoo RItD ogI'SdAHjHhA pull 'uulpraaw ul igVIN alnoW jo .rosuods ollp aqI so fuln,ras onutluoo of saslsop aMO olqu 'S��Ii�HM puu 'Wd s,ratllaS In 'Isnilnd pun 'Xlnp 'aunt trt dtrluana XPptsj X.rana'sar,ras Iuana arnouT .rooplTlo Xjjaam o'unrprag�t Ul IgVIN arnoy�t slsoTt 'IuaurlstrdaQ uorluasoa-1 pug mpud unlp1mW agl Ttlanwili puu Sq '�SIl ' `Sv�2I��IM '(,.rosuodS„) 04ppl'ndwaM'puo-d.ragosu5l 'S IOIZ sl mippu Inool osogm'a.rumulaG Jo MIS agI Jo smut Qq) saptm pazluuRTo uollusodroo u `aMo olqu0 pun `(<,,tlla„) ogupl'uujprsaW'anuanV Aumpnosg 'a ££ sr ssa.rppo asogm'ogepl jo alms agl JO smul agI •spun pazlu921,10 uotlu,rodroo Iudtorunur u'upiploWjo XIID aqI uaamloq purr Xq '(„alnq anlloa3J9„) L IO ` Tu r jo 4vp z srgl uo opm sr („IuatuaaT��T„) d,l�l�y��guOd d[HSHOSNO MJIL IZOZ-LIOZ NVIGINHI i NI IRDim slAOW slg,L INUMa' H2I0V cIIHSHOSNOdS of Uld, IZOZ'LTOZ AIMIQiRM All MOM HIAOW Lap Znavd IN9Mu40dd[HSHOSNOdsM1,i•sxotNa[AOW •)joogaord uo oftd;uatu;mda0 uol;uaaoa-g pur sxard urtplioN jo 4;ta oq; uo pa;sad oq tlrgs allsgom's,aosuods o; Null u pur o$ol s,aosuodS -V luautow2V stq; jo tuaa; oq; lnoq�noaq; alnpagas uutpraaN ut aq!?tN atnON dN0 olgra algrjtrAr ,Cl;uaaaa;sow oq; 2ut;stl afrdgam s,41!D oq; uo o2ud oqa uo pa,frldstp oq 11rgs a;lsgom s,aosuods of lull r pur o2ol s,aosuocis £ •alnpagas urTpiaaN ut 14�IN OIAO l dNO algra aq; ilutpsil agrdgom s,41!D aq; uo acrd oq; uo pafrldslp oq 11rgs a;tsgom s,aosuodS o; )1u11 r pug o.Wol s,aosuodS •Z •s;gvr.T 3u1suaoll OIAOUt Xq pa;;ruuad sr Tatpow jrtaos outluo put, `gutwrssow jtrut-a `Olpra `aadrdsmau `apin0 �;tnpa� aaurwns�sulads not;raaoa�j a8 s�l.Trd urtpraay�l aqa ut;uau�asl;aanp� ' 1 :sa.toJJa Vulst;aaApr pur lruol;outoad Butmolloj oq; o3juaaapun llrgs S;ta `urippow ui ig2TN arnoW djg0 olgra o; p.100.1 q;rnn 'uoi3outroaj Ura Ao saraarligrsmoasacx ZINvs,ixalx 'zx UJu;S jo Jalga s,ao,(rW aqa jo uozsstw.Tad ua;;tam `ssaadxa aq;;noq;tm osodand Xur aoj o2ol s,Sjla osn;OU llugs aosuods;uq; paptnoad `;uoutooBV slq; ,ropun ssassod Scut X;ta s;g2ra ,Tag;o XUr, ao SMAtad 3o s;ggra s,rf;ra 3O UOljgOTA anoq;Tm `uotjtmiojut otjgnd pur `Sur;aNartu `?ulsl;aanpr JO sosodtnd .toj outru s,X;r0 osn of uotssttund aosuodS o; 840AUOa Xgo.Taq ,i;tD-o�loj'atuou s,Sjla jo asjl •Q •;uam;andoa uol nwoox pur slaud um ].TOy�l ag; �o ao;aa.trd aqa J0.10P.10 To �atlod ;ta sa;rlotn astm.raq;o;rg; ao `oto;rut�utt,tastp ao `;ualotA `lrnxos'aur3oid st;rgI �ul�rssouz aaillo ao 'aotnrtlaq `a2rn�url opnloui;ou saop oaptA gutcuoolam oq; ;uq; aansua Ilrgs .Tosuods sajjjfjgtsuos pur `sonlm `sa.9r llu a03 a;rradoadde oq llrgs umotls Intaa;um 1Ir `puo srq; oZ •pua;;r oa pa;tnur oq t1rgs otlgnd aqa jo saagtuow llu ;rtl; pur aorld atlgnd r st poSBId oq Illm ooplA 2ttimoolam aq; gotgm;r anuaA otl;;rga saiipotmomlar aosuodS •aosuods;0tu-ol2uts s,)Iaam;rg; JO oaplA puoaas-4j.Tlg; r pur °saosuods Vul;uosa.Td s,.moS ;rq; Vupowoad s;umuost;aanpr oaptA puooas-R;.ng; (Z) oma `;uaurast;,raApr oaptA puoaas -Xiattll s,aowodS apnlaut oa `;g$tN 9TAO l gNO olgr0 oa pmon aqa ftTwoolam uollnanp UT sa;nulw (Z) om; Sto wtuixo.Tdde jo OaptA r `urlpt.[alnl ut agVjN oleoW ZNO olgra Xaana puu gara Jo hp 0t1; uo `(uoou) urd oO:Z I Xq do Notd o; gels ,f;la .Toj algrltrnr anutl pur oonpoad q;tm uol;rulpa000 ut `Arils aosuodS •oaplA 2ujur0319M •a •.To;aaCoad.Toopino X;tlrnb as;roq; (l) auo osugoand o; XI!D o;;soo at1; But;uosaadaa `(0Q0`Q1$) s.trllop pursnoga uaa XITD Sed hugs aosuods juaiusad losuods •g •ra.Tr But; ms oq; punon, Auldsip aoi (,g) 1001 ag3ra urq; .Toptm ou saauurq Vutpur;s-aatj (Z) om; pur `uaa.ras alnotu aqa uo Xvidsip aoj (,g) laai;qi?ra uuq; optm ou aauurq (I) auo aorld Xvw .Tosuods 'S L, do 6 HJVJ .LNi3INiI OV dIHSIIOSNOdS U'T11,11HDIN 9InOW •�Sjard �upruiuT.Tal all) Xq uolluuimiol Bons jo oollou ua)lym jo �ti►llruT uodn pa)ruluijaj oq Ilrgs juatuaa.T$y sigl'poljod Mons ulgltm paino lou st linrlap aqj jT •jlnnlap oq) ajno of oopou gans jo jdiaoa.i,ioiju skip, (p£) rSpiI anrq Ilugs Mmd ftli rjap ally •uollruluT.Ial TOJ spunwi? aqj Xjloods Begs pun'alrumio4 of luolul sll jo Xpud Suillnrlap oql of oollou uallt.rm VulAia Aq juaujaaj$d aqj alrulua,Ial of jgil.T oq) anuq Ilrgs X)Trd Taglo agl'luotumjVV sill) ,iopun suoilnVrlgo IrTaalrtu s)i 111llln3 of sl1r3 .To'ui sllnrjap APOS'120u ,lo Xilnilllm Mind Taglra 3T .To '.Iuomoo.Tgy sig) jo oouruiao3,iod oq) ut lonpuoosim jo lou Xuu ui paRnguo'Iu9tuaaj2V sial jo suoijnlndljs To/pun'swawaajvr 'sjuruanoo aqj JO Xur pajrloln'Iuatuaa.TVV Slgj JO uoillpUOO jo tujal Sur g)lM dldtuoo oI polinj snq .Iaillo oql Intl) souiwolop rS)jud .Iaglla 3r •asno jol uollnulcuaay • I luolloulumay •Q •aauransuT XIaadojd ,io/pue 'aaunansui uotlusuodmoo s,.iQ laoM'aouransui oligotuolnr'aourjnsuT XlTllquil'ol pol!wil jou jnq'guipnloul 'luotuooTSV sigl uigllm pogijosop suoT)rSllgo pun slggtj s,josuodS ao3 sjsoja)ui olqu.Tnsui s,.iosuodS )oaload o) Tapao uT poambai oq Xum sn oour.insuT 6Trssaoau llu uiulgo Ilrgs josuodS 1pnd Irgl jo Sjillglsuodsoj otos oql oq llrqs IauuosTad pun Suodoad anijaadsaa s,Xjjrd gory jo ooaujnsut Ilr pun �Suy •utojoq pogl.Tosop suoijL,2ggo oq);Io oouu.tagljnj aqj .To slgBTT aqj jo asioTaxa aqj ut aosuodS Aq' tiolvi.Tapun Xjlnijar iSuu .moo of ao'juawoojSV sigl jo aouuaaglxn;I oq) uT aosuodS r q posn sluljowtu.To juawdinbo Our 3o a�ru tp To'llagj 'ssol .TaAoa of oouransui aplAwd jou )legs 4110 'Ajjjjglsuodsaa s,.iosuodS aauoinsul ,0 •asn s,.TosuodS grim a.Taimm ao joilluoo jou scop asn juo.unouoo Bons aiagm Mand sjal)los jo asn InlMrl'Iuajjnouoo s,uosjad,Sur g)lm aTa3.ialtli o) jggl.T aqj jou 'uulpijaW ut )gBIN alnoW dN0 olqu0 mo.T3 aos.Tad 3utpigr-mel Xun apnloxo o) lg2lj o(j) iaq)tau apnloul hugs luawaaj,3y stgl Xq .TosuodS of p01uu.12 0901inl.id .To lg2yj XUV •rf)Ta ;Io Mainand olos oql ultlllm oq sowil lir jr hulls golgm jo 2ullnpogos pun luomo2mum oql 'cords otlgnd r st Mand saaljlas jrgl aspolmou�lor �flssojdxa olojoq soilmd aqj, •.TosuodS,Sq sainllar parlaa lr pun Xu VupnlouTojaaapalual soillpor punr salnoul llr Pun uripTjoW ui lggiM OIAOW dN0 olqua Vulllaouuo xo/pur Ouijnp9qoR ui uoi)ajoslp pun AjllTglsuodsoj alos anuq Ilrgs rola soouvjs(unojjo To suoijlpuoo jagjo .io jagjram of onp Sarssaoau oq Asm uopnlloouro jnq'lsnsnV pwe'Xlnr'aunp himp ssulmogs chow XI)IaaM (VI-ZI) uaajanoj oI anlaMI opnlout Ilrgs olnpagos sal.ias Iuana uulplJow tit AVIN arnoW FINO alqua gong jrgj o2polmoulou sollaud aqj, tuilnpagas :uollullaauo0 g •ula.ioq pagsilquiso poglotu oqj r q Xjaud Togj to Xq paluutmiol jollam ssolun ' I toZ `l .TagtualdoS gBnojq) a)rq anpoaJJF(aqj tuoT3 oq Iirgs asuaoil sigj 3o Umol aqj, -m.xay •d 9ROISIAnxd')dH!,1uaf)'III •aan)uialTl puu S.IOSd untpT.TOW ul jtl2iN ainoyg aN0 olqu0lo dol agl lu polsod aq llrgs o2ol s,josuodS'olgtssod o,ioMM •g L da V aabd aaNnwaauoy duasiToSMOdS 9111j, IHDIN niAow -Silo Aq opnw aq Untis IuautaOBIR slgj Jo aouiawaOj,Tad agj u1 Silo jo louuosaad ag1 Jo uoljnuSrsap puia uolloalas aqj 'XIII uI pajsaA .TOMOd TO Sjg21.T 4UU aslo.Taxa of X3lllglsu0dsaa ao Sjlaogjnr 0u 0AU4 hags ,Tosuods 'juju ooMV sly 3o waal ayj ful,Tnp s.TaT]jj0 ,TOJ saolA,Tas wjopod 01 IyVI.T agj urrjaa Bugs aosuods '41!D 3o 00SOlduTa un IOU sr .Tosuods juga agpolMou�ou sopaud ylog 'Alo, jo Woldwo .ro 'juailn 'Irlogjo fun pun Tosuods uoomjoq .To XITD pun aosuods uoomloq Woldwa pun aaSoldwo jo ditIsuoijula.T OTVurgsllqujsa To gu►IUOTo se ponalsuoo ao pola.Tdtalul oq IIUgs juowoa.TSy slgl uI gulyloN 441!;D jo .Tauland To'aa.mjU0A Iulaf'jU0VV'Qo4OId1U0 ur IOU pun ,Tojor.TluOa juapuodopul un sr .Tosuods juga sOIIaUd jo uolluolul sso.Tdxo agj 81 11 'sali-ind jo dlgsuoliviag g 'SUOtInj01A jnq �urpnlour Ig2tt�fdoo To'uxslTulSrid'Sounrad o uoljUlorA'lagll aoj suxrrio of pajlwll jou 'jualu0o xayjo ,To °3voMjau 'Xdoa OapIA .T0 olpnU s,aosuods jo futkaldsip SAID JO uOsuaT Sq olgnrl auw000q hw XI!D agj gorgnn ioi'saal ,shu,Tojjia Vulpnl0ul '.TanaOsjugM aanjn u Sun 3o 'sosuadxa pun 'sjsoo 'so&wnp 'sossol 'ssulpaaoo.Ta 'Sluawg.pnf'sllns'swlrlo Ilia tuo.ijxj!o ssolw,juq Ploq Pun puajap'Xjruwapur 'ol sow2v XgaTaq pun 'Iluys aosuods'luowaaa2V sly of juUnsTnd pampoad ao pajnaao saoald oaplA agj Jo Iuajuoo llr of sp 11ry1 sluosaadaa 'pun sjuu.TaUM .Tosuods-Sllumapul 'Z 'juawaoavv s}qj 3o uual aqj $ur.Tnp Iutaajrw Bons Xun Ilpo ao allona.T of Ig91a aqa 30 .taetrM r pa,Taplsuoo oq jou llrgs Silo Xq TuAOTddt'.-0ad Cub .Tosuods kq pajuaa0 ao 'pasn 'poljltugns lulaajrw u0411.1M ao'oaplA 'olpnu fun 'outp fun In 'laafaa To 'laouUo 'aonpaT 'Irpo Am 'uoljaTaslp Ojos sjr ul 'XIID 'Silo Sq luAoaddV ' I moljanpoad oaplA 'a •Ittaw00,19d stgl jo gouaaq ia of olqujncIplln .Taglo ayj Aq poululsns sohmep ,Toi AllltquTl An jo panalla.T oq Ilugs ,(jm)d aagjlau 'uolslnoad slyl ?u►punjsgjlMloN •aosuods jo Alaadoad ayj uluwa.T IIUys luatuaaavv sly aapun u0lssrtugns .Toj paaudaad To poliltugns pun paauda.Td sjonpoad)IaoM ,Tayjo IN PUB "n ToJpun'SIUlaajnw UOIIITM VOMj.Tu'SWUlpao0a,t OlpnUWnl0oj oaplA paysturJun pun pagslulf IIN 'Silo 3o Rlaadoad agj ulrwa,T Ilugs'j o aaAd srgj of palula.T TO .Tapun Silo �q posugoand luatudinba pup sjonpoad 11v pun Sup pun a u' lOUd uaa.Tos ally aIV undo jooj-Xjalyj nmoula ijV uado ayj gurpnioul'juowaaaRV slyl jo aoun.taglan ur ,To uulpl,TaW uI jg9IN 01AOW HNo algr.D ,Ioj Silo Aq posugoand Iuaiudlnba llia'aw.1 Sun jn'asnn0 jnogj!m To aoj .toglogm'Ajaud Tagjla Sq uoptuitu.Tol uodn 'luatuao.TSV slgl Xq pa40nuo3 slg2rT ayI jo oommoyjanj ut pautioul suopngllgo ao juau100,13d slyl of juunsind papinoad slUlaajuw jo luawdrnbo RuU .To3 so tuep ao uoilusuadutoo 01 poljpuo oq llUgs XIA d ,104110u'asnuo jnogllM ao ,Tod .TatpagM `6I0Z `I klenuup aalju Xj.tnd.Tayj!o Xq U0111MIwaaj Jo Iuana ayj ui '00015$ of dn'juawasangwlaa poluaoad ia .Tosuods of aajjo IIUys 40'610Z'I Axanuup of aolad osnno InoyjlM IUOWOQJ2V slyl sajnulw.taj 911D Iuana agj aI 'uollnupwal uodn aoljusuadutoa ,£ '0011011 ualipm 'RAUp (59£) OAli-Sjxls paapung aaagl X1,jvd .tagjo agl 01 Burptno.td Aq osnra jnotlllM ao uosraT AUU .TOJ Iuomowi?v stgl alnurtuaal Sew Aped aayjrg 'asnea jnoTllla uolluaim.tal Z L 3a S Havd INHWHERO ' dIHS-dOSNOdS HIIIJ,IHJIN MON puu sasoo olguuosuaa aanoaaa 03 polapuo oq llugs Sired VutTtunaad ogj'juauaaaAV slgj jo suotatpuoa pup suaaal agl Tapun Rpautaa ao aqua 4m, gsTjquaso ao loolosd 'owo,iva of sgujpaaooad To uoi�ov �Suu sVuliq kjTud ngjjo 3I •saaj �s fauaojjn puu sisoa lq 'oaaaaq soiaand gjoq Xq pouVis auaulaaafu uon!,tm uodn idaoxa paaallu .To poljlpow'poViuluo oq jou Af w luoutooAV stgl jo smol otlj, -gatmwoq snoauuaodulaauoo To 3oaaaq uollnoaxa aqj oa snotnaTd aagaagm'uaaalam ao Trao .Toglogm 'Xl;ted aagljo jo sjuA3 jo 'Xaaud aagpa �q apum quowoonput ao'sosituoad'sluaulaluls llu puu Am sopasaadns juauTaaa�d sTgy satjaud aqa uoamloq ilutpuuasaapun wiaua aqa somil uoo auomoo V silty quatuaaa2V amjua N •diompuuq bosuns m'juauoui'luotsSgd Xuu To uolauauarao junxas `utT.ro uo;u'au'xas'ol�tm�o �sip louliugsaosuodS'juomoo.Tgdslgajoas.lnoaaqa3noq�no.Tgy,uoinuiut mip.uoNj smui luool puu 'apjs 'lmopaj olquoilddu llu puu Suu gatm Xidmoo llugs aosuodS'juomoojVV stgl jo osmoo oqi inogVnoagy *mul gjctl aaunilduioa X -uiToj,lad of 2uTTTuj os Xaaud aqa ,Sq auautaaTsV sjga 'aapun llnuJap u pun'3o goua.Iq r Olnipsuoo 1[mis Tapuna.Taq suoTau�?tjgo aqa jo Suu ulaojaod STowil of o nlIq aqa augj puu 'juowowVV sigl of padsaa gatm aouasso agj jo Spopis st aorta jvgj owh puu 4polmoulor saTaaud aqy •aauauw Rlauttl v ut pomsojaad oq iings juomoo ?V Slgl .Iapun paptnoad saaTnaas jugj saVpajmouNou aosuodS 'aauassa aqj jo atull •1• -auaulaaiRv stgl oa papla,T ao juunsand uoNtpopun saTatni}on 3o ajnsaa aqa su portluaT auToout ft?,10j parvo soxua jo wouihd aqa ,lob: ojgtsuodsw Slolos oq 11ugs aosuodS -saxgy -j 'SOO Soldula ao SIUOVV'saaolyo q ao XJID jo jonpuoo snoTaaol aqa jo ano guistau S)tjTqutl aoj adaaxa'suoplpuoo umoujun ao umoul of ojquangppP oq huT ailumup .lo ssol qons ,Tatljatlm 'auomoo V stgl jo ooulamiojaod s,aosuod,S' of woptouT ao gjtm pmouuoo Sum Auu uT To'jo ano $ulmal? `tUO.TJ Rulsin, Maodoad ao suoslad of afucuup puu ssol aoj uopngtaluoo jo agRTa agj �IutpnjouT 'AIta Isuidt? osanooaa puu suTfelo lie puu XU13 antum 'scop Xgaaaq puu `Hugs aosuodS •aan,TgAI .fl sTaaaunlon .To soo4oldwo sat .To 41!D jo aonpuoo snotl.Ioa alt; 3o ano Vutstau ao Xq posnuo jou puu saaatn(ll ao's.laa1unlon 'sauaVu 'SOOSOIduta s,aosuodS Aq .lo aosuodS ,Sq Aaaadoad juuosaad .To 1ua.l s,RITa 3o osn alp uloTj 2ujjjnsaT To jo ano 2utsT.lu Cum Xuu ut 41.Tado.Td ao suoslod of solanfut To saguulup woTi uoTlou ,to unulo ',SIglquil Issol ,feu ung ssoltmetl Mata plod puu Xjlumoput of saaa�u .taglanj aosuodS -soo4oldmo sat ao sliD 3o aonpuoo snola.Tol oq) jo ino fujstau ao Aq pasnno jou puu 'uoony .yedat ao aouutlaluirm jo joul ku ao 41.10doad luuoslad ao jual s,AIID 3o uoTlIpuoo oqj tuo.ij 2uptnsal To jo Ino 2UTs13u saga.]union .lo 'Sluagu 'saaSojdtua s josuodS of pun 'auauldinbo ao S Tadoid luuosaad s,aosuodS oa'Tosuods of XmfuT ao sailuulup ioj uopon ao'luamgpnf'Luivjo l4pllquTl `ssol �fuu uao.13 salmi q 4110 spjoq puu 4111 sa13ruutaput.Sijuogtoads aosuodS -uolaBa1ltutuapuY a G J0 9 aovd 1N9W4H21oV dIHSNOSNOdS H11,111HOIN HIAON oqs, •.rosuodS to luo2n pur antdrluasatdaa 0q1 sr for o1 pozr.toganu 41np si oq 'utalaq g1a0J las lualxa ag101 '11181 saur.larm kissa.tdxo pou8tsiapun ag,l, •Rjlao>gjnn 3o,(IuBaanM •M •salrpurut xioln1111s s,A)tD to 411,10q)n11 aq1 aapun Butpunj otignd 3o Xjq!gritrA11 aql uodn pos11q st 1u1Dul00a8V sill) Jo Xltptl-0A 9g11-04100.1811 pur a8p0lm0u4011 salind aqy mopelado,tddy-uolq •n utatag Alaataua apip ut g1xoj jos aaam sltgtgxa aqa dt sr 3oataq jo Gard r oprm pur aoualops Aq pal-0.todtoout on luowowVV stgl of sltgtgx0 IIV •s;lglgxa Ti 'q)TmOxag snoautiodutaluoo ao joa.taq uoilnaaxo aql of snotnaxd .tagtagm 'uollpm ao Irxo °s2utpurlsx0pun JO 'sasral `81uatu003819 aaglo lir pur fur sopos.tadns pur satl.I-0d agl o auau ow& aatluo 0gl sutrlaoa luatu0012V stgZ •Juaufoaaft ai ua •y •paptnatd uta.Iaq aauunm aqa ut oBurgo Bons jo oopou aallt.Im 2utAi2 Xg gdra8rard stgl jo osodand oql xoj ssmppr sat aiu11ga htU Sind ragliF[ Zti9£8 ogrpI'Umptaaw L89£8 ogepI'rdturrl •aAV X11mproag •a ££ proU npiux .E[ 10TZ U111 1j0w to sjfD gNOaiq-0D tolrUtpiooD uotr0.toag'altqM aaua-d 302rurw iu.10UOD 10gos1100D IXJOgD 50suoas ;sm0ll0J sr passaappr 'l!TaW souls paltun fq 2uglem uodn polmiunuumoo pamaap oq Ilrgs pur 8utlt,lm ut oq li-0gs `luatuaaa8� stgl ut palms asjmaaglo ssolun 'ola.tag soilard aqa jo .raglta kq poplAoad oq of paatnbo,t ootlou Tit,pur r ud •aailom •S •peon oq tugs aapunaaag tosuods of palurl8 slqWt.t tIr Put luatuaatav saga `ta,toj lua,ttno sat ut lstxa of 0003.losaodS ptnogS •�SjjD jo luasuoo u011�.tm ssaidxa 0q1 lnogltm .taputionq satatitgtsuodsw ao slg8ta slT aalsur.tl ,to 'lor.tluoogns `lolgns'UWTssr lou tugs aosuodS •JuatuOlssej ON •7l 'paloallr oq lou Rutis 1u0ut00-IVV stgl jo aapulutow agl 'aigraa,tolu0un ,to °ptirAUI `irValit 0q of uotptpstanf lualadtuoa 30 l,Inoo r Xq punol st auautaaa d stg13o uotsiAo.Id Cur 3C •�fltlignaaAaS •Zj 1potuat .tag;o Xur 3o uotsnloxa oq1 of oq lou tugs mrI Xq pomoilr .To u[a,Iaq.toj paptnoad XPOW0.1 �Su11 JO aStodax0 aql `astma? !j 'mrI Sq pamoll-0 KP*Wa.t .to 3g8ti Taglo Cur apniaxa llrgs auou pur aAprinutno aq lugs palr,.routnuo utataq smpautaa pur slg8ti l[�1 satpautaa pun siq�l,Y anllBinucn� d •og11pl 'SjunoD up -V 3o slinoo aqa ut oq Mugs anuoA IUaU10a.18V slgl Jo auautaa.Ioluo put; 00mem,topod'uotlrlatdaalut'�CltptirA aql a A0111 Iirgs ogrpl3o oj% agl jo sm8l aqZ •ntul otlnpl Xq pauaaA02 JU01UaaJRV •p •pop.trmr jatia.t aaglo ,SUr 01 uotltppr U,'notlotpsI nrluolodutoo to vt1oo r Xq pouttuaalap sr'saaj 'Nsoutopu L JO L updd LNRWFIRMDV dINS)IOSNOdS H-Ilfj,,LHDIN RIAO1j ,�,yV]NL 74110 yav`�� y � O II V t16T'` 3ITaTa Rlta solof 'D :Isayyv .10hw ° (Oop Ru►ulrl .NVIQRIa7AI AO AJda QI RaIIrA Isar — ,la�ru>ayli Ir.lauaa `agasl ga �HosmOdS 'L IOZ `R.►rnurp jo hp agl uo auau>aa.12?d stgl painaaxa anrq olaTag satlTrd oill',IOagaHAj SSUNZIM ILII 'Irno.iddr Itounoa Rata urtpt.ic)Wjo oouasgr atll tIt RlipllrA 3o,Iooid sr ponaasuoo oq lou Ilrgs [rnoadde To uotlrot3ilrT Bons of .loud moloq pooua,la3a.l suos,lad aqa Rq auatuaa.IVV stgl 3o notlnaaxg 'luatuaaT d Qq) iutnoaddr uotlor llaunoa Rata uadn pauotltpuoo R{sso.idxa oq Ilrgs IuotuaaT5d sigl jo RatptlrA oqy-paalrtbaa Ineoadde Ilaunoa RIIa -X l.losuodS jo jIrgoq uo utaToq pogstlgrlso sr satltllgrll agl Idoaor, of pun `uta.laq glTo3 Jos suollr2I1go aql of ,losu0ds purg of pazTToglnn Sl ag lugl slurTarM .Toq)Tnj pougts,lopun Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 1 OA PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Ordinance No./ 2, % 7 ,�--S : An Ordinance (H-2017-0009) Amending Meridian City Code as Codified at Title 11, Section 3 Entitled Unified Development Code of the Meridian City Code Pertaining to Sign Requirements; and providing for a waiver of the reading rules; and providing for an effective date. MEETING NOTES u✓ APPROVED Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 27-17- 0S BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMIER, LITTLE ROBERTS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE AS CODIFIED AT TITLE 11, SECTION 3 ENTITLED THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO SIGN REQUIREMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Unified Development Code is the official zoning ordinance for the City of Meridian and provides an opportunity to better support the Comprehensive Plan and provide a tool that is relevant and contemporary to the needs of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems it to be in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of its citizens to incorporate changes to the Unified Development Code within the City of Meridian pertaining to Sign Requirements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That Meridian City Code Section 11 -3D -8C(4), Unified Development Code, be amended in part as follows: 11-3D-SC(4): Business Signs For Multi -Family Developments And Allowed Nonresidential Uses: In addition to the general standards for business identification signs set forth in this section, the following standards shall apply to business identification signs for multi -family developments and allowed nonresidential uses (R-2, R-4, R-8, R-15, R-40, and TN -R), excluding accessory uses: 4. Freestanding signs are allowed. In addition to the standards set forth in subsection A14 of this section, all freestanding signs shall meet the following standards: a. The maximum background area of any freestanding sign shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet. b. The maximum height of any freestanding sign shall not exceed eight feet (8'). c. A maximum of one freestanding sign is allowed per property. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE RE: SIGN REQUIREMENTS- H 2017-0009 PAGE 1 OF 2 de. Changeable copy signs proposed as freestanding signs are allowed. In addition to the standards set forth in subsection Al2 of this section, all changeable copy freestanding signs shall meet the following standards: (1) Any changeable copy freestanding sign visible from a public street shall be programmed as follows: All displays, including, but not limited to, graphics, letters, numbers, color and/or brightness shall remain unchanged for a minimum of ene4tew fifteen (15) seconds, except that any text messages that are longer than the display area and do not contain any graphics may scroll in a consistent and predictable manner. (2) Only one changeable copy sign proposed as a freestanding sign shall be allowed per property. Section 2. That all other provisions of Title 11 as they relate to the Unified Development Code remain unchanged. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this � day of April, 2017. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this _ 1 day of April, 2017. APPROVED: ATTEST: Tammy de W C -M 10 Clerk UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE RE: SIGN REQUIREMENTs- H 2017-0009 PAGE 2 OF 2 NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17- �LS An Ordinance of the City of Meridian amending Meridian City Code as Codified at Title 11, Section 3 Entitled the Unified Development Code, of the Meridian City Code as it relates to Sign Requirements; Providing for a Waiver of the Reading Rules; and Providing an Effective Date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective upon the passage and pub of Mayor and City Council By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk AuctsT r3 r e ty of 1 w� SEPI I; First Reading: Adopted fter first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code 50-902: YES A NO Second Reading: Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 17- 12 �5 The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance No. 17- —)7)-9 of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3). DATED this a O day of April, 2017. William. L. ary City Attorney UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE RE: SIGN REQUIREMENTS — SUMMARY—H 2017-0009 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 10B PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Ordinance o. n uroinance - - or Me e -zone of a Parcel of Land Situated within the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; Establishing and Determining and the Land Use Zoning Classification from the R-2 (Low Density Residential) to R-4(Medium-Low Density Residential) (10.17 acres); R-8 (Medium Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium -Low Density Residential) (33.84 acres); R-15 (Medium -High Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium -Low Density Residential) (.25 acres); C -C (Community Business) to R-8 (Medium Density PPciriPnfinII If 77 nnrPcl• nnH P-1 S (NAA- iii im-Hinh nPncity Pi-6HPnfinII to P -P f&At- iii im MEETING NOTES APPROfLnJ'11, Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035133 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=9 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/21/2017 01:53 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. -- BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CA'VENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS AN ORDINANCE (H-201.6-0128 -- TREE FARM SUBDIVISION) FOR THE RE -ZONE OF A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED WITH THE WEST % OF THE S OUTHWEST %4 ANA THE SOUTHWEST % OF THE NORTHWEST 1/ OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE I WE, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY IDAHO; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-2 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-4 (MEDIUM. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)(10,17 ACRES); FROM R-8 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-4 (MEDIUM -LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)(33.84 ACRES); FROM R -I5 (MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-4 (MEDIUM -LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)(,25 ACRES); FROM C -C (COMMUNITY BUSINESS) TO R-8 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)(.27 ACRES); AND FROM R-15 (MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-8 (MEDIUM DENSITY RE SIDENTIAL)(154 S.F.) ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE,- AND RDINANCE;AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" is within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for re -zoning by the owner of said property, to -wit: Drew Eggers, SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby re -zoned from the R-2 (Low Density Residential) to R-4(Medium-Low Density Residential)(10.17 acres); R-8 (Medium Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium -Low Density Residential)(33.84 acres); R-15 (Medium -High Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium -Low Density Residential)(.25 acres); C -C (Community Business) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(27 acres); and R-15 (Medlum-High Density Residential) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential)(154 s,f,) zoning districts, in the Meridian City Code, SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian zone said property, REZONE ORDINANCE— TREE FARM SUBDIVISION - RZ H-2016-0128 PAGE 1 OF 3 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2017-035677 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=10 LISA BATT 04/24/2017 12:37 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to re -zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Cleric of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of AEVIY ,2017. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this l� day of �� r j , 2017. MAYOR T Y de WEERD Hca AUGUS1,d ATTEST: o�o�`� 1� C.JA OL S C CLERK w SFSQ RE ZONE ORDINANCE — TREE FARM SUBDIVISION - RZ H-2016-0128 PAGE 2 OF 3 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss: County of Ada ) 41 On this $ day of �(I , 2017, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in dared TAMMY and for said State ersonall a p y pp de WEERD and C.JAY COLES, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (�TA$�, �•:� Notary Public fo ho V Residing At: • My Commission Expires: • 1 I • *seems SS 1 �dj9 �1'IBL1G, �p•�: RE ZONE ORDINANCE - TREE FARM SUBDIVISION - RZ H-2016-0128 PAGE 3 OF 3 EXHIBIT A AV, im 'a Ar No 1-U-8 COMPANIES UN Z"AN0UP 04" MKc.APPINO 01ROEIJ J-U*B ENGINEERS, INC. Tree Farm Subdivision -Medium Density Residential (R8) Boundary Description Project Number 10-16-0,77 November 15, 2016 A parcel of land' situated with the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range I West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence North 89017'18" West, 2,647.24 feet to a found aluminum cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 22; Thence along the west boundary of said Section 22, North 00'30'42" East, 1560.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said west boundary, North 0,0*30'42" East, 703.26 feet Thence leaving said west boundary, South 8964519" East, 295.43 feet, Thence South 32018'57" East, 126.56 feet; Thence South 08*0228" East, 65.48 feet; Thence South 00,*01'52" West, 64.53 feet; Thence South 20143'04" West, 120.77 feet, Thence South 04*40'09" East, 47.03 feet; Thence South 07'3736" East, 60.91 feet; C LA 11779 C 1(11511 Of Page I of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 208-376-7380 f 208-3231.9336 w b.corn CJ-UIB,l ,J,U*B ENGINEERS, INC. Thence South 10'33'55" East, 48.10 feet; Thence South 15*58'08" East, 49.53 feet; Thence North 74'01'52" East, 155.05 feet, i THEAYEWAY 111 j 1.1 CO I'M PAI I'll I E AN LGDX O"APPING op M 1. ORO P 1Mr_ Thence 19.86 feet southerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 120.00 feet, a central angle of 09028'54", and a long chord which bears South I0"41'59" East, 19.84 feet, Thence 344.77 feet southerly along the are of a reverse curve to the right having a radius of 2,017-00 feet, a central angle of 09*47'37", and a long chord which bears South 10*32'37" East, 344.35 feet; Thence 45.90 feet southeasterly along the arc of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 45,00 feet, a central angle of 58'26'13", and a long chord which bears South 34'51'55" fast, 43,93 feet; Thence 115.39 feet easterly along the arc of compound curve to the left having a radius of 473.27 feet, a central angle of 13*58'12", and a long chord which bears South 71*04'08" East, 115.11 feet; Thence South 78*03'14" East, 56.46 feet; Thence South 19056'46" West, 537,79 feet; Thence 118.25 feet westerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right having a radius point of 800.00 feet, a central angle of 08428'10", and a long chord which bears North 69-20'25" West, 118.15 feet; Thence North 65"06'21" West, 221.65 feet; Page 2 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 p 208-376-7330 L 208-323-9336 w www.jub.co IKE r4TEWAY UB J, U 8 COMPANIES LARanam MIPING GROUP J -U-8 ENGINEERS, INC. Thence 163.86 feet northwesterly along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 750.00 feet, a central angle of 12*31'06", and a long chord wh lch bears North 71*21'53" West, 163.54 feet; Thence North 77*37'13" West, 61.49 feet, Thence 43.53 feet northerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1,500.00 feet, a central angle of 01*39'45", and a long chord which bears North 06*32'40" East, 43.52; Thence 32.56 feet westerly along the are of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 960.00 feet, a central angle of 1'56'37", and a long chord which bears North 73943'19" West, 32.56 feet; Thence 506.64 feet northerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1,468.00 feet, a central angle of 19'46'26", and a long chord which bears North Q4°24'25"' West, 504.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 683,631 square feet or 15,69 acres, more or less End Description. 1 77 0 Page 3 of 3 a 254 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83Z22__g 208-376-7330 f 208-323-9336 w www, ub.com (rJ-U Tur GATEWAY J U 8 COMPANIES LANOWN MAPPING 0*4DOP INt. J -U-13 ENGINEERS, INC. Tree Farm Subdivision -Medium -Low Density Residential (R4) Boundary Description Project Number 10-16-077 1► ovember2,2016 A parcel of land situated in the West 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 and the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range I West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence North 8901718" West, 2,647.24 feet to a found aluminum cap marking the southwest corner of said Section 22; Thence along the west boundary of said Section 22, North 00'30'42" East, 2263.89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said west boundary, North 00030'42" East 348.72 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of the Phyllis Canal as shown on Record of Survey 7900, recorded as Instrument No, 107067669, records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence along said southerly right-of-way line the following nine courses and distances: North 65'15'13" East, 174.26 feet, North 71*21'04" East, 300.98 feet, North 74*33'18" East, 164.83 feet; North 75*49'29" East, 79.69 feet; North 81*10'02" East, 156,99 feet; C Page I of 3 a 250 SOUTH Seechwood Avenue, Suite 201, BOIS&JID 83709_1.1.208-376-7330 f 208-323-}336 tv, wMjv.ubcom U -B J -U-0 ENGINEERS, INC. North 80*36'32" East, 317.18 feet, North 79*11'07" East, 128.36 feet; North 79*313'38" East, 40.23 feet; THE k1rrWA.Y j U. B COMPANIE5 9, CRLAHOOUOPORkWG PIN* 3 1 North 76"3321" East, 13.91 feet to the east boundary of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence South 00030'32" West, 338.90 feet to the northeast corner of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22; Thence along the east boundary of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 22, South 00*30'49" West, 1851-43 feet; Thence 458.56 feet westerly along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right having a radius of 906.04 feet, a central angle of 28"59'53", and a long chord which bears South 87"26'49" West, 453.68 feet; Thence North 78*03'14`' West, 215.76 feet; Thence 62-54 feet westerly along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 800.00 feet, a central angle of 04*28'44",; and a long chord which bears North 75048'52" West, 62.52 feet; Thence North 19056'46" East, 537.79 feet; Thence North 78'03'14" West, 56.46 feet, Thence 115.39 feet westerly along the arc of curve to the right having a radius of 473.27 feet, a central angle of 13*58'12"; and a long chord which bears North 71604'08" West, 115.11 feet; Thence 45,90 feet northwesterly along the arc of a compound curve to the right having a radius of 45.00 feet, a central angle of 58026'13", and a long chord which bears North 34*51'55" West, 43.93 feet; Mae FAM N Page 2 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Bols& ID 93709,_/2 208-376-7330 208-323-9336 w wwwjubxa YftgAYKWnY }U -B 3-U B COMPANIES GROUP GDOH 1 Mt PPtNQ .J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. Thence 344.77 feet northerly along the arc a reverse curve to the left having a radius of 2,017.00 feet, a central angle of 09°47'37'; and a long chord which bears North 10°32'37" West, 344.35 feet; Thence 19.86 feet northerly along the arc of a reverse curve to the right having a radius of 120.00 feet, a central angle of 09928'54", and a long chord which bears North 10°41'59" West, 19,84 feet; Thence South 74°01'52" West, 155.05 feet; Thence North 15°58'08" West, 49,53 feet; Thence North 10°33'55" West, 48.10 feet; Thence North 07°37'36" West, 60.91 feet; Thence North 04°40'09" West, 47.03 feet; Thence North 20°43'04" East, 120.77 feet; Thence North 00001'52" East, 6453 feet; Thence North 08°02'28" West, 65.48 feet; Thence North 32°18`57" West, 126.56 feet; Thence North 89°45'19" West, 295.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 1,927,625 square feet or 44.25 acres, more or less. End Description. ��v�¢R PIA 11779 Of10,0 :�/_j RtcGA� Page 3 of 3 a 250 SOUTH Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 P 208-376-7330 i 208-323-9336 w www.jub.com 0 300 600 Scale in Feet Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 19.86' 120.00' 9,28,54" 510'41'59"E 19.84' C2 344,77' 2017.00' 9'47'37� S1O-32'3711E 344.35' C3 45-90' 45,00' 58'26'13" S34'51'55"E 43,93' C4 115.39' 473.27' 13'58'12" 571-04'08"E 115A1' C5 118.25' 800,00' 8-28"10" N69'20'25"W 118,15' C6 16186' 750-00' 12*31'06" 71'21' 3"W 163.54' C7 32,56' 960,00' 1'56'37" N73'43'19"W 32.56' C8 4153' 1500.00' 1'39'45" NO6'32'40"E 43.52' C9 506.64' 1468.00' 1 19'46'26" 1904'24'25"W 504.13' am— Line Table Line # Direction Length Ll 532'18'57"> 126.56' L2 508*02'28"E 65.48' L3 SOO'01'52"W 64.53' L4 S20*43'04"W 120.77- L5 SO4-40'OVE 47.03' L6 S07'37'36"E 60.91' L7 S 10'33'55"E 4810' L8 S15758'08"E 49.53' L9 N7401 '52"E 155-05' L10 S78'03'1 4"E 56.46' L11 N77'37'13"W fiS89*45'19"E 295.43' L2 N L3 L5 L6 0 L7 \,q C1 0 Z I � 1� C3 --u-z'Z Lia 6 - !1 UD i U-) C7 C8 Uj Ll I CO 6td. 0, 01 z Lot 2, Puma Sub, 21422 2647-24' 22 28 27 N89'1 7'18 W 27 W, Chinden Blvd. (U.S. Highway 20/26) i ree t -arm bumvision SHEEt 0-40frWAM 'W14F TO UL USED. WMME 0W407. CjAM Medium Dens�y Residential f -8) Located in the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of 14J-13 E NGIN EEKS. INC. 'r--kl. A k1 -i. M-- 4 W-# 0 Al NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 17- / 7a PROVIDING FOR RE ZONING ORDINANCE An Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting re -zoning of a parcel of land situated with the West '/z of the Southwest'/4 of the Northwest'/4 Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County. This parcel contains 59.94 acres more or less. Also, this parcel is SUBJECT TO all easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. As in attached exhibit "B" and is not based on an actual field survey. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the __L_ day of /" �Gi y , 2017. 4��A,fND A.UCt/5", U Cq f 1y ofM dian �°��?� Mayor and City Council ( t, 0.°'°. By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk SEWN First Reading: L� Adopted a er first reading by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code 50-902: YES NO Second Reading: — Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 17- / 7 �)-6 The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance No. -1-6f j - % of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3). DATED this. day of 2017. William. L.M. Nary City Attorney RE ZONE ORDINANCE SUMMARY- TREE FARM SUBDIVISION-RZ H-2016-0128 PAGE 1 0 300 600 Scale in Feet Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 19,86' 120.00' 9'28'54" WS10'41'59"E 19.84' C2 344,77' 2017,00' 9'47'37" 510'32'37"E 344.35' C3 45.90' 45,00' 58'26'13" S34'51'55"E 43.93' C4 115.39' 473,27' 13'98'12" 571'04'08"E 115.11' C5 118.25' 800.00' 8'28'10" N69'20'25"W 118.15' C6 163.86' 750.00' 12'31'06" N71'21'53"W 163.54' C7 32,56' 960.00' 1'56'37" N73'43'19"W 32.56' C8 43.53' 1500.00' 1'39'45" N06'32'40"E 43.52' C9 506.54' 1468,00' 19'46'26" N04'24'25"W 504.13' Line Table �- (11779 Direction Length L1 OF tj�r�© �O C� J, I , V REDeEor•nnatitisxra ti � nonnue+:[, nNo me: nEncNlD DcrannDwcoAroAnrcu,art1f F' lS nN INSI RXKAJ,r 4-4 MES.'I:nNhi [J5EDF4YU1(KE "1,tjti. D EN"Jj4Cn l,N<A`lI115 UR[ I!, UC USED, U, Yt1101E Dn!'ldti. -U 13 AUR AUn710HCPJ,U.D ENUI,IEC 346-TPAE.ti r51Y[11}f Line Table Line # Direction Length L1 W53218'57"E 126.56' L2 S08'02'28"E 65.48' L3 500'01'52"W 64.53' L4 S20'43'04"W 120.77' L5 SO4'40'09"E 47.03' L6 S07'37'36"E 60.91' L7 510'33'55"E 48.10' L8 S15'58'08"E 49.53' L9 N74'01'52"E 155.05' L10 S78'03'1 4"E 56.46' 1-11 N77'37'13"W 61.49' I-U•B ENGINEERS, INC. - p11�111��= .�- S89'45' 19" > 295.43' 10 j tp f' L2 L.3 to LU r L.7 1- �9 C1 rc o z �nno f� C-� f r c f L10 ci I C7 C8 <a w L 11 Co ¢ � ' C6 �^� 0o I zi Lot 2, Puma Sub, 21 22 26_47_24' 22 t� 28 27 N�39'�7'18"W 27 W. Chinden Blvd. (U.S. Highway 20/26) Tree Farm Subdivision SHEET Medium Dens!Residential R-8 Located in the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of 1 Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, S.M. Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 1 1 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1) (d) To Consider Records that are Exempt from Disclosure as Provided in Chapter 1, Title 74, Idaho Code � d 1 P /� �;3%P/11 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: April 18, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 12 ITEM TITLE: Future Meeting Topics PROJECT NUMBER: MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS