Loading...
CC - Staff Report / RecsSign Ordinance Text Amendment – H-2017-0009 1 STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: April 4, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bill Parsons, Planning Supervisor 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2017-0009 – Sign Ordinance Text Amendment I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST The West Ada School District has applied for a text amendment to modify UDC 11-3D-8C to allow an increase in background area and sign height of freestanding signs AND time period for which a message is conveyed with a changeable copy sign for multi-family and allowed non-residential uses in residential zoning districts. NOTE: The text changes proposed by the applicant are provided in red font in Exhibit A. Staff recommended changes to the applicant’s proposal are provided in a strike-out and underline format in Exhibit B. II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed text amendments to the UDC based on the analysis provided in Section VII and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law listed in Exhibit B. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on March 2, 2017. At the public hearing, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the subject UDC text amendment request. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Virginia Cunnigham ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Mike Hirano, Todd Christensen and Tim Clare iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Time period for which a message is conveyed with a changeable copy sign. ii. Difference between a subdivision identification sign and a free-standing sign. d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Commission modified the time period in which a message is conveyed with a changeable copy sign from staff’s recommended duration of 15 minutes to 15 seconds. e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. None III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017- Sign Ordinance Text Amendment – H-2017-0009 2 0009 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 4, 2017 with the following modifications: (add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0009 as presented during the hearing on April 4, 2017 for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to continue File Number H-2017- 0009, to (insert specific hearing date), and direct staff to make the following changes: (insert comments here.) IV. APPLICATION FACTS A. Site Address/Location: Citywide B. Applicant: West Ada School District 1303 E. Central Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 C. Applicant's Statement/Justification: See narrative and Exhibit A for more information. V. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject application is for a Unified Development Code Text Amendment as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code Title 11 Chapter 5, a public hearing is required before the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on this matter. B. Newspaper notifications published on: February 10, 2017 (Commission); March 17, 2017 (Council) C. A public service announcement was broadcast via email on February 2, 2017 (Commission) and March 10, 2017 (Council) regarding this application. VI. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS Staff finds that the subject Unified Development Code Text Amendment complies with and furthers the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The specific objectives and actions that support the proposed amendment are listed below: • “Keep current the Unified Development Code and Future Land Use Map to implement the provisions of this plan.” (7.01.01A) The applicant request is to only increase the signage height and background area for those facilities along collector and arterial roadways when there is at least 750 lineal feet of street frontage. This request is consistent with other sections of the sign ordinance. The applicant believes the signage is needed to effectively inform the traveling public about upcoming school events and other public safety announcements. Sign Ordinance Text Amendment – H-2017-0009 3 • “Enforce City Codes.” (3.05.02D) Staff believes the proposed changes should not be detrimental to the welfare of the community. As mentioned above the requested changes are consistent with other sections of the sign ordinance. However, staff is recommending changes to the applicant’s proposal to ensure impacts are minimal when such signs are adjacent to nearby residences. Staff also believes the proposed changes make it easier to enforce and consistent with other sections of the code. VII. ANALYSIS The applicant has applied for a text amendment to modify UDC 11-3D-8C to allow an increase in background area and sign height of freestanding signs and time period for which a message is conveyed with a changeable copy sign for multi-family and allowed non-residential uses in residential zoning districts. Current code allows a maximum height of 8 feet and a maximum background area of 50 square feet when a freestanding sign is proposed in a residential zoning district for multi-family developments and allowed non-residential uses. The applicant’s proposal would allow the height of the sign to increase to 15 feet in height and allow a maximum background area to increase to 80 square feet if the property has more than 750 lineal street frontage along a collector and/or arterial roadway. The increase in height and background area proposed by the applicant is identical to the freestanding sign allowance in the L-O zoning district. Note: The size of the background area also has a direct correlation to size of the changeable copy sign. The changeable copy sign allowance is 30 percent of the proposed background area. This section of the sign code is not proposed to be modified with the subject application. The other request deals with the time period for which a message is conveyed with a changeable copy sign. Current code restricts the number of changes to copy to one (1) hour intervals. The applicant is proposing that the copy be allowed to change at eight (8) second intervals consistent with other sections on the sign code (commercial and industrial districts). Staff believes the current requirement was imposed to minimize the impacts to other residential uses that are typically found around school sites. For this reason staff is not amenable to the request and has proposed a modification to the applicant’s request. Staff believes the one (1) hour interval is too restrictive and recommends that the code by modified to allow the changeable copy to change in fifteen (15) minute intervals (see Exhibit B). Staff recommends approval of the proposed text changes with the modification proposed by staff. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Strike-out/Underline Version of the Proposed Changes B. Staff’s Recommended Change C. Required Findings from the Unified Development Code Sign Ordinance Text Amendment – H-2017-0009 4 Exhibit A. – Strike-out/Underline Version of the Proposed Changes Sign Ordinance Text Amendment – H-2017-0009 5 Exhibit B. Staff’s Recommended Changes d. Changeable copy signs proposed as freestanding signs are allowed. In addition to the standards set forth in subsection A12 of this section, all changeable copy freestanding signs shall meet the following standards: (1) Any changeable copy freestanding sign visible from a public street shall be programmed as follows: All displays, including, but not limited to, graphics, letters, numbers, color and/or brightness shall remain unchanged for a minimum of one hour eight (8) seconds fifteen (15) second minute intervals, except that any text messages that are longer than the display area and do not contain any graphics may scroll in a consistent and predictable manner. (2) Only one changeable copy sign proposed as a freestanding sign shall be allowed per property. Sign Ordinance Text Amendment – H-2017-0009 6 Exhibit C. – Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. Unified Development Code Text Amendments: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant a text amendment to the Unified Development Code, the Council shall make the following findings: A. The text amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds that the proposed UDC text amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section 6, of the Staff Report for more information. B. The text amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; and The Commission finds that the proposed zoning ordinance amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. It is the intent of the text amendment to further the health, safety and welfare of the public. C. The text amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts. The Commission finds that the proposed zoning ordinance amendment does not propose any significant changes to how public utilities and services are provided to developments. All City departments, public agencies and service providers that currently review applications will continue to do so. Please refer to any written or oral testimony provided by any public service provider(s) when making this finding.