Loading...
2016 09-01Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda – Thursday, September 01, 2016 Page 1 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. City Council Chambers 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho Thursday, September 01, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. 1. Roll-call Attendance __X__ Patrick Oliver __X__ Rhonda McCarvel __O__ Gregory Wilson ___X__Ryan Fitzgerald ___X___ Steven Yearsley - Chairman 2. Adoption of the Agenda Approved 3. Consent Agenda Approved A. Approve Minutes of August 4, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting B. Approve Minutes of August 18, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes 4. Action Items A. Public Hearing Continued and Re-Noticed for September 1, 2016 for Laurels Townhouses (H-2016-0065) by Northside Management Located at 2116 S Accolade Avenue Recommend Approval to City Council – Scheduled for September 27, 2016 1. Request: Rezone of approximately 1.87 acres of land from the TN-R zoning district to the R-15 zoning district 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Consisting of 20 Building Lots and Eight (8) Common Lots on 1.38 Acres of Land in the TN - R Zoning District B. Public Hearing for Hill's Century Farm Commercial (H-2016- 0092) by Martin Hill Located 3625 E. Amity Road Recommend Approval to City Council with Modifications – Scheduled for September 27, 2016 MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda – Thursday, September 01, 2016 Page 2 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 1. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Twenty (20) Building Lots on 19.73 Acres of Land in a C -N Zoning District C. Public Hearing for Maddyn Village (H-2016-0075) by A Team Land Consultants Located West Side of N. Meridian Road, South of E. Ustick Road, North of W. Sedgewick Drive Recommend Approval to City Council – Scheduled for September 27, 2016 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of Approximately 10.398 Acres from the RUT Zoning District to the R-8 Zoning District (Approximately 6.874 Acres) to the R-15 Zoning District (Approximately 3.524 Acres) 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Twenty- Nine (29) Single-Family Residential Lots, Ten (10) Multi- Family Residential Lots and Five (5) Common Lots on Approximately 10.398 Acres in the Proposed R -8 and R-15 Zoning Districts 3. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Multi-Family Development Consisting of Forty-Eight (48) Dwelling Units in the Proposed R-15 Zoning Districts D. Public Hearing for 2016 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendment (H-2016-0098) by City of Meridian Recommend Approval to City Council – Scheduled for September 27, 2016 1. Request: Amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Text of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan as Follows: 1) Update the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) So That it Represents the Built Environment and Existing Land uses; 2) Update Various Text Through-Out the Document and the Goals, Objectives and Action Items Meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Meridian Planning and Zoning Meeting September 1, 2016 Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of Septmber 1, 2016, was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairman Steven Yearsley. Members Present: Chairman Steven Yearsley, Commissioner Patrick Oliver, Commissioner Ryan Fitzgerald and Commissioner Rhonda McCarvel. Members Absent: Commissioner Gregory Wilson. Others Present: Michelle Hill, Andrea Poque, Sonya Waters, Bill Parsons, Josh Beach and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-Call Attendance: Roll-call ______ Gregory Wilson __X__ Patrick Oliver __X__ Rhonda McCarvel __X__ Ryan Fitzgerald __X__ Steven Yearsley - Chairman Yearsley: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. At this time I'd like to call to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for the hearing date of Thursday, September 1st, 2016, and let's begin with roll call. Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda Yearsley: Thank you. Next item on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda. We have no changes to the agenda, so I would entertain a motion to adopt the agenda as presented. McCarvel: So moved. Fitzgerald: Second. Yearsley: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda. All in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 3: Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of August 4, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 2 of 44 B. Approve Minutes of August 18, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Yearsley: Next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda and on that we have to approve the minutes of the August 4th, 2016, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and to approve the minutes of the August 18th , 2016, Planning and Zoning meeting. If there is no changes or comments to those, I would entertain a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Fitzgerald: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald: I would move that we approve the Consent Agenda as presented. McCarvel: Second. Yearsley: We have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. All in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR YES. ONE ABSENT. Yearsley: Before we move onto the next phase of this, I would like to explain the hearing process. So, we are going -- on the agenda we are going to open each item one at a time. We will start off with the staff report. The staff will present their findings regarding how the -- the items adhere to our Comprehensive Plan and Uniform Development Code with staff recommendations. The staff will have their chance to present their recommendations. The applicant will have an opportunity to come forward to present their case for approval of their application and to respond to any of the staff's comments . The applicant will have up to 15 minutes to do so. After that we will open this up to the public testimony. There is a sign-up sheet in the back for anybody wishing to testify. Any person wishing to come forward will be allowed three minutes. If they are speaking for a larger group, like an HOA or if there is a show of hands, they will be given up to ten minutes. After the public has had a chance to testify, we will ask the applicant to come back and have an opportunity to respond to the applicant's -- or the public testimony and they will be given up to ten minutes to do so. At that point we will close the public hearing and the Commission will have an opportunity to discuss and deliberate and, hopefully, be able to make a recommendation to City Council. Item 4: Action Items A. Public Hearing Continued and Re-Noticed for September 1, 2016 for Laurels Townhouses (H-2016-0065) by Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 3 of 44 Northside Management Located at 2116 S Accolade Avenue 1. Request: Rezone of approximately 1.87 acres of land from the TN-R zoning district to the R-15 zoning district 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Consisting of 20 Building Lots and Eight (8) Common Lots on 1.38 Acres of Land in the TNR Zoning District Yearsley: So, with that I would like to open the public hearing for continued and re-noticed application from file number H-2016-0065 with Laurels Townhomes and let's begin with the staff report. Allen: Thank you, Chairman, Members of the Commission. The applications before you are a request for a rezone, a preliminary plat, and a development agreement modification. The last of which does not require Commission action. This site consists of 1.38 acres of land. It's zoned TN&R and it's located at 2116 South Accolade Avenue, which is south of East Overland Road and west of South Eagle Road. Adjacent land use and zoning. To the north is vacant land zoned C-G. To the south are multi-family residential apartments, zoned R-15. To the east is developed common lot -- undeveloped common lot, zoned TN-R and multi-family residential apartments, zoned R-40. And to the west are also multi-family residential apartments and vacant land, zoned R-15. This property was annexed back in 2006 with an R-15 zoning district and a development agreement was required as a provision of an annexation, along with the Kenai Subdivision. A modification of the agreement was approved back in 2007, along with a rezone for R-15 to TN-R and a new preliminary plat for Gramercy Subdivision. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation for this site is mixed-use regional. The applicant has submitted a request to City Council for a modification to an existing development agreement to change the land use and building elevations from live-work units to solely living units. A rezone is 1.87 acres of land is proposed from the TN-R to the R-15 zoning district, consistent with the mixed-use regional future land use map designation. The rezone will facilitate the development of 20 townhomes. A preliminary plat is also proposed as shown that consists of 20 b uilding lots and seven common lots on 1.38 acres of land in the proposed R-15 zoning district. A north-south local street is proposed along the east boundary of the site. You can see my pointer right there. And a public alley is proposed off the local street for access to homes. A north-south pedestrian pathway is proposed mid -block within the development and conceptual sample building elevations for the townhomes were submitted as shown on the right. The ones on the left are the live-work units that were previously proposed that are being changed . All structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in architectural standards manual. Written testimony has been received by the applicant Scott Noriyuki, who is in Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 4 of 44 agreement with the staff report. Staff is recommending approval with the conditions in the report. Staff will stand for any questions. Yearsley: Thank you. Are there any questions? With that would the applicant like to come forward? Noriyuki: Commission, Scott Noriyuki, Northside Management, 6810 Fairhill Place, Boise, Idaho. Staff did a great job of explaining everything. We formally agree with all conditions of approval and I will stand for any questions. Yearsley: Are there any questions? No? Thank you. Noriyuki: Thank you. Yearsley: We will wait here to see if anybody has signed up. So, I do not have anybody wishing to testify on this application. Is there anybody with -- that would like to testify? With that I don't think we need to bring the applicant forward to comment on his own comments, so at this time I would entertain a motion to close the public hearing for file number H-2016-0065. Fitzgerald: So moved, Mr. Chairman. Oliver: Second. Yearsley: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Yearsley: Any comments or thoughts? McCarvel: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: I am in -- in favor of this. I think the thought for this kind of development is good with all the different accesses out to the two major streets. I think it fits nicely back in there. Yearsley: Thank you. Fitzgerald: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Fitzgerald. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 5 of 44 Fitzgerald: I agree. I think there is a ton of employment around that area. The live-work is not necessary in this -- I think in this location just because of the employment and commercial that's there, so I'm in agreement. Yearsley: Thank you. Oliver: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Oliver. Oliver: I as well agree. I think it fits the area. It's a good design. It looks well and it fits in the area. Yearsley: I also, too, and I think it gives it a -- you know, there is some homes there, there is a lot of apartments, so this kind of gives it a separate mix of housing out in that area and so I think it works. I think it will look really nice. So, I guess with that I would entertain a motion. McCarvel: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I moved to recommend approval of file number H-2016-0065 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of September 1, 2016, has presented. Oliver: Second. Yearsley: I have a motion and a second to approve file number H-2016-0065. All in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Thank you. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. B. Public Hearing for Hill's Century Farm Commercial (H- 2016- 0092) by Martin Hill Located 3625 E. Amity Road 1. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Twenty (20) Building Lots on 19.73 Acres of Land in a C-N Zoning District Yearsley: Next item on the agenda is the public hearing for file number H-2016- 0092, Hill Century Farm Commercial, and let's begin with the staff report. Allen: Thank you, Chairman, Commissioners. The next application is for a preliminary plat. A development agreement modification is also proposed. However, it does not require Commission action. This site consists of 19.73 Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 6 of 44 acres of land. It's zoned C-N and R-8 and located at 33625 East Amity Road at the southwest corner of East Amity Road and South Howry Lane. Adjacent land use and zoning. To the north is East Amity Road and agricultural land zoned RUT in Ada County. To the south is a future city park, a YMCA, library and elementary school, zoned C-N. To the east are rural residential agricultural properties zoned RUT in Ada County. And to the west is agricultural property. Future single family residential has been approved there, zoned R-8. A little history on this property. An amendment to the future land use map was approved last year to change the future land use map designation on his property in the larger area from low density residential to mixed -use neighborhood. The property was annexed with a C-N and R-8 zoning districts, with the requirement of a development agreement. A property boundary adjustment record of survey was later approved in 2015 and that was the map shown here on your left, the current configuration of the property. The Comprehensive Plan future land use designation is designated as mixed-use neighborhood. The applicant is requesting a modification to the development agreement to include a detailed site plan and modification of certain provisions of the agreement. Although that application does not require Commission action, I am going to go ahead and run through the applicant's request, just so that you're fully aware of everything that's being requested. The existing development agreement included a conceptual bubble plan for the mixed-use designated area that lists future possible uses and no site details. For this reason the development agreement required a detailed site plan to be submitted and approved prior to a plat application being submitted and any development occurring be yond the school and YMCA, park site to ensure development is consistent with the objectives and vision of the mixed-use neighborhood designation. A detailed plan for the first phase of the development is proposed as shown, which includes a medical clinic at the northeast corner of the site, with an assisted living facility immediately to the west on two building lots on six acres of land. Details are not shown for the 18 building lots surrounding these lots on the remaining 13.7 acres of the commercial area. The applicant anticipates that many of these lots will be consolidated as users are determined in the future and has included a list of possible uses , all allowed uses in the mixed-use neighborhood designation, and requests the development agreement not be required to be modified again i n the future to include a more detailed site plan as required in the development agreement. To insure the site layout is consistent with that desired in mixed-use neighborhood designated areas, staff does recommend the development agreement is still required to be modified in the future to include a more detailed site plan for the remaining area , since none was ever submitted on this part. The applicant also proposes to delete Development Group Provision 5.1, which states the maximum building size should be limited to 20,000 square feet building footprint. Because the provision states should, rather than shall, and is not necessarily a requirement, but rather a recommendation, staff does not recommend deletion of this provision. However, staff has included a modification to the provision for clarification on that matter. Last, the applicant proposes a modification to provision 5.1-I, to require annexation area to be so divided prior to issuance of Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 7 of 44 any single family residential building permits, but would allow commercial development to proceed with building permits that require subdivision of the property prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy permits beyond those required for the development of the school and the YMCA and the park site. Because the development agreement requires detailed site plan approve through modification to the agreement and because details haven't yet been provided for the 13.7 acres of the commercial area, staff does not recommend modification of this provision. However, staff is amenable to modifying the provision as follows: The annexation area shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits beyond those required for the development of the school , YMCA, and park sight as shown on the concept developmen t plan and the assisted living facility and medical clinic shown on the detailed site plan approved with this application . So, that is just a review of the development agreement modification. Next the applicant's preliminary plat, it consists of 20 building lots and two common area lots as shown on 19.73 acres of land in a C-N zoning district. The boundary of the plat does not include all the area included in parcel as shown on the record of survey. So, this is parcel two on the record of survey and their plat stops right here at this red line here. This area right here shown in red is a 171 foot wide strip of land zoned R-8 along the west boundary. It is not included. Because this will create a remnant parcel that's not legal to build on , staff does recommend that this area is included in the boundaries of the proposed plat. This area is to be included in a preliminary plat in the future with rest of the residential property to the west when it develops. It's the intent of the applicant, as you can see here when this residential property here develops, to include that portion at that time. However, not -- so that a remnant parcel isn't left staff is asking that it be cleared within the boundary of this plat. It does not necessarily need to be final platted, as long as the applicant gets around to filing it with this part that would be fine. A driveway access is proposed via East Amity Road. You can see right here where my pointer is at. And another driveway access is proposed via a South Hillsdale Avenue, which is currently Howry Lane, but will be named Hillsdale in the future. It will be a future collector street. A local street, South Tavistock Way, is also proposed for access in this location here via Amity in the future and, then, another local street Hill Park Street along the south boundary of the site is also proposed to be at Hillsdale Avenue . Because the UDC requires access to be provided via local streets when available, the proposed direct lot access via Amity and Hillsdale will require Council approval of a waiver. A c ross-access ingress-egress easement is required between lots in the proposed subdivision. A 25 foot wide landscape street buffer is required along Amity. A 20 foot wide buffer is required along Hillsdale and a ten foot wide by buffer is required along local streets, Tavistock and Hill Park Street. Conceptual building elevations were submitted as shown for future retail office and professional service buildings on the left and assisted living memory care facility as shown on the right. All structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the architectural standards manual. Written testimony has been received from Mike Wardle, the applicant's representative, in response to the staff report and I will let the applicant go over his comments with you. Staff is recommending approval Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 8 of 44 with the conditions with the request that a comment is added for the Parks Department under Section 6 in Exhibit B of the staff report that the Parks Department desires East Hill Park Street to have on-street parking on the south side of the street adjacent to the city park. Staff will stand for any questions. Yearsley: Are there any questions? I actually have a couple -- just a couple. Are they proposing to -- and maybe I should ask this of Mike Wardle, but to do all the frontage improvements first or are they just going to do in -- for those first two lots; do you know? Allen: Chairman, as a requirement of the subdivision plat all the street buffers adjacent to streets are required to be in -- Yearsley: Okay. Allen: -- as a subdivision improvement. Yearsley: Okay. Thank you. Any other questions? With that would the applicant like to come forward. Wardle: Mr. Chairman, Commission Members, Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation, 12601 West Explorer Drive in Boise. Sonya, if you could pull up my slide presentation, I'm going to -- there we go. Just a brief run through before I discuss the conditions of approval that Sonya addressed. This first schematic is the very, very simple bullet -- or bubble plat that was submitted with the original annexation and zoning application. I did note that the final action taken by the Council did slightly change the zoning at that point, so that black hatched line delineates the R-8 and C-N zones. I'm not smart enough to run -- okay. Turning around and looking to the south just for an update. This aerial photograph was taken in April at the time when the Hillsdale Elementary School was under construction, but, obviously, has been completed and is now being used for the first time. Shortly -- well, within the next few months it's anticipated that the YMCA complex immediately to the north that we are common joining with that elementary school will begin construction. So, the red oval is the area that we are discussing this evening within the C-N zone and, then, the yellowish gold oval is the future R-8 zoned property that will be forthcoming in a few months. It kind of specifically shows that same area. A little bit more definition in terms of a boundary. I would just make a notation relative to the home -- Marty and Dixie Harris home in the northeast portion of this slide that there is a specific condition that I will refer to in a bit concerning that. Next slide, please. Now, putting the concept together showing, again, the YMCA-Hillsdale Elementary School complex and the Hill Park that the city would be constructing -- and I don't have a date on that, but this complex would be coming together over the next few months and year or so, so that -- that area will be richly benefited from public and private facilities combined and, of course, it does show on -- the next slide gets a little bit more specific to the items Sonya identified as our detailed plan at this Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 9 of 44 point being the clinic at the northeast corner, the assisted living. The two arrows show the points of access that the Council will be requested to waive to the collector -- Hillsdale on the right, Amity, the arterial to the north, those two access points have been approved by ACHD. They have not formally submitted their staff report, but I believe they communicated that to staff and I actually forwarded ACHD's concurrence e-mail some time ago. Another slide, please. This -- I just wanted to show the juxtaposition of the school and YMCA and park facilities that are directly south of Hill Park Street, the east-west street that basically serves to front door both projects, the commercial to the north and these community facilities to the south, and I believe -- okay. One other item -- and I'm going to just let this one rest for a moment while I take you through the conditions, because there is a specific request that I have proposed. I learned something a little bit from Sonya's presentation. Apparently -- the item five, the DA modification elements are really probably not something that -- well, you won't be making any recommendation, so unless you have questions to the comments I would just wait until we get to the City Council and just take you to page three of the handout that was provided. I hope that you have that. Color coded to assist in the sense that anything and really -- we are not asking for any changes. We conclude with a few comments on some of those. The first point on page three under the Planning Division site specific conditions of approval, refer back to the slide that Sonya showed you where the red outlined portion to the rest that is zoned R-8 -- there you go. We did not include it, because -- yes, we can include it if we are required to do so, but it will not be final platted, it would just simply show up on a -- on a map. But my concern is sometimes you get something on a drawing it becomes part of a project that it doesn't really relate to and causes confusion in future applications. So, from my perspective under condition 1.1.1, items A and B and, then, the next condition down, Item A, all relate to that same question and it's my belief that it does not change any of the issues by removing that parcel or that portion of the parcel from the plat , because it is zoned R-8. So, I have requested deletion of those particular items on page three. On page four I'm going to retract my request to delete condition 1.2.4. That was kind of a peak of frustration, because I had -- was not aware that the code had been changed and there was now a new process that requires -- that there is a process that we can deal with the irrigation laterals. We will deal with that at the final plat stage of this action. So, we can just go ahead and assume that 1.2.4 stays, because, frankly, nobody has the ability at this point to waive or delete it. It's a -- it's a requirement that we will deal with in due course. On page six -- and that's why I wanted to go back, Sonya, if you would, to that last slide that I had up that showed the water mains -- yes. There you go. Thank you. Condition 2.1.1 talks about, you know, the extension of the sewer and looped water around the -- I have added a word there -- looped water mains to provide service to the park, YMCA, Hillsdale Elementary School, and Hills Century Farm Subdivision. All of those water mains will be installed -- the solid lines will be installed and we will end up with looping systems for not only this project, but also the Hill Century Farm residential project to the south, the YMCA and school complex -- all of those will be in a dual looped system. We will also extend -- because we will be Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 10 of 44 constructing the new Hillsdale Avenue north from the YMCA site to Amity Road, we will install a 12 inch main there. We are simply requesting that we not be required to construct a 12 inch water main between those that form s a third loop, because there will be a development on the north side of -- of Amity in the future and at this point the school district owns that property for a high school . Whether they build it or not I can't say, but they own it and they have done some planning on that. It's our belief that that water main does not serve us or make any -- doesn't provide any additional security because of the dual looping that we have as noted down into the Century Farm Subdivision back to Eagle Road. So, I'm simply requesting that we delete the requirement along the frontage of Amity for that 12 inch water main. Would appreciate your consideration of that. 2.2.3 was a simple wording change. That's the thing that we have actually -- the City Council has approved in two recent applications for us and that is that the easements for all of these utilities need to be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the city engineer, not prior to development plan approval, because that simply can delay the process unduly. So, it's a simple language change that the City Council has already concurred with in the past. Next page. Page seven. This is simply a statement -- because there are some farm buildings and so forth that are on the property that we are simply saying that existing structures within the bounds of the plat or right of way that are required to be removed be -- do so, but some of those facilities lay to the west in property that won't be developed until that R-8 goes in the future. So, we just don't want to have to take out any structures before their time . 2.2.9. This is simply an acknowledgement that commercial property is different from residential. You can build more than one commercial structure on a lot and so it's appropriate for residential to have everything including the plat recorded prior to applying for building permits, but in this particular case, since you can construct commercial on this parcel without the subdivision being completed, we simply asking to change the word building to occupancy and, actually, this has been done in a couple of earlier applications that we have brought forth through the Council -- Commission and the Council. And, then, finally, in 2.2.11, it's an issue that we have found interesting. I know staff has been very cooperative, but we get to a point where homes are constructed, occupancy permits are requested, but some of the landscape and fencing items that are common area facilities have not yet been completed, so it's up to staff to determine whether or not they would be able to -- be willing to grant an occupancy permit for a residential structure if those things aren't done, but they are bonded for. They had to be bonded for in order to secure -- you know, to sell that parcel for the lot. So, we have added that language -- we actually did this with the City Council about two weeks ago. Just to note that rather than have to do some negotiation with staff, if the bonding is in place, which it must be, then, we believe that even if the fencing and the common area improvements are not totally done, that there is no reason not to issue the occupancy permit. The city is covered. There is no liability. So, those are the only changes that I would propose, given the fact that item five at the very beginning on pages one, two and into page three are Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 11 of 44 development agreement considerations for the Council. I hope I haven't confused, but I would be happy to answer questions to unconfuse if I did. Yearsley: Thank you. Are there any questions? Fitzgerald: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald: Mr. Wardle, in regards to the remnant parcel, what's your plan for -- it's not in the original R-8 plat and if you don't want it in this plat, where do you want it -- where do you want it to go or how do you want it to be handled in planning? My concern is that it gets -- it's just out there and, then, there is -- it's kind of a remnant parcel that we don't know how to deal with later on. Wardle: We actually have concepts for three different types of residential, because that parcel is R-8, it does have -- we have got concepts that we are working on currently. It will be platted with that proposal. So, everything that's coming up to this north-south street, Tavistock as it's called, that will incorporate that parcel, that remnant. So, it will be a part of a preliminary plat that will be coming to the Commission within a few months. Fitzgerald: Thank you. Wardle: I would just restate, Mr. Chairman, that it can be added to the preliminary plat. It doesn't hurt necessarily, but it has the potential to confuse if it's part of a preliminary plat versus being handled when it's taken up with the zoned property consistent with it. So, that's the reason. Thank you. Yearsley: Any other questions? I actually have a couple and some of this maybe Sonya can help me with. The 2.2.3, didn't we go through this a couple of weeks ago about -- another applicant asked for this same -- I believe very similar comment and I'm not exactly sure -- I think at that time we didn't allow that and I'm kind of curious to what staff is thinking on that. Allen: Chairman, I don't recall. Yearsley: It's been a while, so I -- Allen: Yeah. And, I'm sorry, but we -- we got the applicant's response this afternoon and I was not able to catch up with the staff member that wrote these conditions, so I really don't have a response -- Yearsley: Okay. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 12 of 44 Allen: -- to address those. I can, of course, make contact with him before Council and get that squared away. Yearsley: Okay. Well, I would I assume the same thing with 2.1.1, since that is a Public Works comment, we would -- we would need Public Works to make that decision or is that -- Allen: That's correct. Everything under section two. Yearsley: Okay. Parson: Mr. Chairman, if I may interject here. Yearsley: Absolutely. Parsons: Our department put together a committee called Development Services Advisory Committee and the one question -- the one condition we can't answer tonight is the looping of the water system. That's going to require someone from Public Works to tell us if it would still work with that line not being included, because when we accept an application we have them provide AutoCAD drawings and our Public Works Department models the development based off of the AutoCAD drawing that we got. So, if their AutoCAD drawing show that line being as part of the development and we need to get AutoCAD drawings that don't include that water line to see if they still have the fire flows per our requirements. So, we can't handle that. As Sonya stated, those are things that we have to answer before City Council and we are more than willing to do that. The other condition, 2.2.3, if you could refresh my memory on that. Is that in relation to getting building permits ahead of the platting? Yearsley: Yes. Parsons: Well, we had a de sec meeting yesterday and I was in that room with Mr. Freckleton at that time and he has agreed to allow some of those things to change, so -- Yearsley: Okay. Parsons: -- Public Works is amenable to some of that happening prior to signature on the plat and that was communicated to the de sec group yesterday and representation from Brighton Corporation was at that table. So, I think, again, we will follow up with Mr. Freckleton, but I think that's something staff would be amenable to -- Yearsley: Okay. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 13 of 44 Parsons: -- and you have the power to make that recommendation that Council support that or allow it to go forward as is and let Council make that change. Yearsley: Okay. Parsons: Now, the 2.1.11 -- refresh my memory on that one. Is that the building permits? Yearsley: That's to be bonded -- Parsons: Oh. And that's another clarification that we had at the de sec meeting. So, our code gives the developer flexibility in getting occupancy permits for commercial and residential developments. We don't give temporary occupancy for single family homes, but we do give temporary occupancies to commercial developments. So, again, this is something that we have had quite a bit of discussion with the development community and we will look at that on a case - by-case basis. They can get occupancy as long as there is bonding in place for the amenities, the fencing, and, of course, the landscaping. So, we have the ability to do that and so, again, I think we have that covered as well to address the applicant's concerns. So, I can help you with the -- we can help you with a lot of those, it's just that looping of the water system that we can't help you with this evening. Yearsley: Okay. Wardle: Mr. Chairman, may I just add a comment? Yearsley: Absolutely. Wardle: Two items where the -- just the simple language additions that I noted -- actually, the Council in recent approvals has already dealt with those and I believe with the meeting that -- that we talked about yesterday, some of those things are clean-up items that will be clarified. As to the water line, the actual application we did submit the AutoCAD files. The plan does not show the water line connection along Amity Road. It shows up to Amity on the east side and from Amity south to the YMCA and across the south boundary of that commercial site. So, I'm sure by City Council that there will be the modeling issue to note whether there is the need or not. Yearsley: Okay. Wardle: So, I think we are fine. It's just -- it will come out in due course. Yearsley: Okay. All right. That's good. Any other comments? So, my guess is speak now forever hold your peace, to be honest with you, so -- thank you. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 14 of 44 Wardle: Thank you. Yearsley: I do not have anybody signed up to testify on this application . Is there anybody wanting to testify on this application? So, with that I would entertain a motion to close the public hearing on file number H-2016-0092. Fitzgerald: So moved, Mr. Chairman. McCarvel: Second. Yearsley: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on file number H-2016-0092. All in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Yearsley: We have a lot to go over. Any comments or questions? Fitzgerald: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Mr. Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald: I'm excited -- everybody's excited for this area of the -- I think the south is going to be very cool when it's all said and done. I think Brighton is master planning it very well. I appreciate the staff's efforts. I'm a little bit concerned about the remnant parcel being there, not being handled and being left out there. And that's my only concern. I understand the points that have been brought up and kind of how we can get the applicant a little bit of leeway. I do understand that the city has some challenges when we have -- we leave parcels that are not platted and hope they get platted later. That being said, I also understand not having -- taking down buildings we don't need to right at this second. So, that's my only concern. I like the project. I think it's going to be great. I know what they are building in Paramount right now it's -- it's going to look nice. It looks like this is very similar to this project. And so I think it's -- it's a good project. Again, it will be very complementary to what's getting built to the south. That's the one piece is just that parcel for me. Yearsley: Thank you. I agree. I understand that they are talking about coming in a couple of months to plat that piece, but my concern is there is a lot can happen in a couple of months and I would hate to have that be left out there and, then, kind of be a no man's land. So, I have a tendency to agree. With regards to most -- most of the others, they -- they seem amenable. You know, the one I think with the water line at this point I would recommend we leave it in until we have comments from staff . Fitzgerald: Agreed. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 15 of 44 Yearsley: And the Council can reflect upon that one, so -- so, I think it looks good. McCarvel: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: Yeah. I agree. I think we can okay off on 2.2.3, 2.2.9, 2.2.11. It sounds like those are all issues that we have worked through and I think -- I'm in agreement of 2.2.5 I think -- staying in there. I think -- I think that section should be in there -- I mean just for bookkeeping and stuff. Yearsley: Right. McCarvel: And, then, 2.1.1 we can -- I think as long as they have got it ironed out prior to Council, it makes sense. Okay. 1.1.1 was the R-8, though; right? Yearsley: Yes. McCarvel: So, 2.2.5 -- Yearsley: And that was the one that leaves the -- leaves the -- or the buildings on the property, was 2.2.5? McCarvel: Yeah. Yearsley: Yeah. Okay. Any comments, Commissioner Oliver? Oliver: Yeah, I do have just one comment. Is that -- considering that there is going to be a lot more commercial put into the section, I think that the first two pieces they are putting in are essential and I feel like having the medical care right next to the senior -- is a -- is a good start for that corner and I think it will work perfect to start as a stepping stone to other public works around the retail. I agree also with all the comments that the other commissioners said about the changes. Yearsley: Okay. Well, this will be a big one. So, at this point I would be -- entertain a motion. Fitzgerald: I'm going to leave it to the professor over here. McCarvel: Okay. Well, let me -- Yearsley: And don't forget on the staff report it talks about the other recommendation for the -- Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 16 of 44 Fitzgerald: Apartment complex? McCarvel: Yeah. It's included with their recommendations. So -- okay. 2.2.5 with the extra buildings in there -- Yearsley: Well, what is underlined is what needs to be added. McCarvel: Okay. Yearsley: And at this point we have this document here, you can just -- my thinking is we can just say we agree with -- McCarvel: The numbers? Yearsley: Yeah. McCarvel: Okay. So, yes on 2.2.5 I guess. Are you -- I guess are you okay with that, staff? Allen: I just -- excuse me. I just wanted to clarify something. If we are concerned about the existing home being required to be torn down before they are necessarily ready to do that, an option would be to have that platted in say the last phase -- final platted and, then, that would remain until such time as that -- that portion is final platted and, then, prior to signature it would need to be removed. So, if the applicant does not include this in a final plat, but, rather, would like to include it with the development to the west, require -- and hopefully this makes sense what I'm trying to say. Per the staff report, if you require that remnant parcel to be included in the preliminary plat at this time, it won't necessarily require that that structure need s to be removed right away, just prior to signature on the final plat in the phase in which it is located. The applicant did not submit a phasing plan for this development, but that is -- that is something that could happen. Yearsley: So, what you're saying is -- is he can leave the buildings there without having to modify 2.2.5. Is that what I'm hearing? Allen: Yeah. Because it requires them to be removed prior to signature on the final plat. Yearsley: And so if it's just not part of the final plat, then, they can stay. Allen: This is a preliminary plat that's before you, so it can certainly be phased. Yearsley: Okay. McCarvel: So, we don't need to include 2.2.5 in the motion. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 17 of 44 Yearsley: Okay. I like that. So, I guess the one question I did ask -- are you okay with just saying yes to those conditions on the numbers, instead of having to read everything out? Allen: Like I said, I would feel more comfortable speaking with Public Works before any -- agreeing with anything on Section 2. But, yes, numbers are fine on the rest. Yearsley: Okay. McCarvel: All right. Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend approval of file number H-2016-0092 as presented in the staff report for the hearing of September 1st, 2016, with the following modifications: To specifically include staff's recommendation as read earlier as part of the staff report. To leave in Section 1.1.1 as recommended by staff. To move forward with applicants request on 2.1.1 -- Yearsley: No, we talked about -- McCarvel: As long as -- after -- I'm sorry. After staff has had consult with Public Works and the AutoCAD drawings are available for discussion prior to Council. And to grant 2.2.3, 2.2.9, 2.2.11 as discussed. Yearsley: And, then, also the staff recommendations for the parking. McCarvel: Yes. I think I said that right at the beginning. Yearsley: Okay. McCarvel: Yes. To include the staff -- specific recommendation as read in with conditions with the request that a comment -- let's see. Is added for the Parks Department under Section 6 in Exhibit B of the staff report. That the Parks Department desires East Parkhill Street to have on -street parking on the south side of the street adjacent to the city park. Yearsley: Okay. Oliver: Second. Yearsley: I have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion? Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 18 of 44 Fitzgerald: Mr. Chairman, just to clarify. So, we are making recommendation on 2.1.1? I just want to make sure so I'm clear. Yearsley: I guess that's your -- Commissioner McCarvel, your recommendation on that? You said to include -- McCarvel: Recommendation to allow staff to work with Public Works prior to City Council. Fitzgerald: Got it. Yearsley: Okay. All right. Allen: And may I clarify? Excuse me. If Public Works is in agreement with the requested changes are you stating that the Commission is in recommendation of those? McCarvel: Yes. Allen: As requested by the applicant? Okay. Thank you. Yearsley: All right. With that I have a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Thank you. MOTION CARRIES: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. C. Public Hearing for Maddyn Village (H-2016-0075) by A Team Land Consultants Located West Side of N. Meridian Road, South of E. Ustick Road, North of W. Sedgewick Drive 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of Approximately 10.398 Acres from the RUT Zoning District to the R-8 Zoning District (Approximately 6.874 Acres) to the R-15 Zoning District (Approximately 3.524 Acres) 2. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of TwentyNine (29) Single-Family Residential Lots, Ten (10) MultiFamily Residential Lots and Five (5) Common Lots on Approximately 10.398 Acres in the Proposed R-8 and R-15 Zoning Districts 3. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Multi- Family Development Consisting of Forty-Eight (48) Dwelling Units in the Proposed R-15 Zoning Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 19 of 44 Districts Yearsley: All right. The one we have all been waiting for. Next on the agenda is for file number H-2016-0075, Maddyn Village and let's begin with the staff report. Beach: Good evening, Chair, Commissioners. As you said, this is an application for Maddyn Village, an application for annexation and zoning, preliminary plat, and for a conditional use permit. The site consists of approximately 10.4 acres of land. It is currently zoned RUT, located at 2975 and 3001 North Meridian Road. To the north we have Parkview Christian Church and Spring Creek Assisted Living Facility, which are both zoned L-O. To the east we have North Meridian Road and single-family residential property, zoned R-8 and R-4. To the south is single family residential properties in the Salisbury Lane Subdivision, which is zoned R-4 and to the west are single family residential properties in Parkway Subdivision, also zoned R-4. There is a little history on this property. As I said, it's currently zoned RUT in Ada County. They are applying for annexation, so that's when the history would start at the City of Meridian. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation for this parcel is medium density residential. The applicant is proposing to develop this 10.4 acre site with 29 single-family residential lots, ten multi-family residential lots and five common lots. The R-15 portion of the site consists of approximately 3.5 acres and will have a gross density of 13.7 dwelling unit to the acre. So, the R-15 portion is the portion here with the multi-family. So, this portion here -- it kind of wraps around these existing homes that will remain as part of the subdivision, if you're following my mouse here. So, this -- this portion here is all the R-15 multi-family portion. The R-15 portion of the site consists of three and a half acres and will have a gross density of 13.7 dwelling units to the acre. The R-8 portion of the site consists of 6.9 acres and will have a gross density of 4.2 dwelling units to the acre. The overall gross density within the proposed project is 7.4 dwelling units to the acre, which falls within the density range for the medium density residential land use designation, which is between three and eight dwelling units per acre. The project is subject to specific use standards for multi-family developments as set forth in the UDC. There are two -- as I said, there are two existing homes and associated outbuildings on the site that are proposed to remain on Lot 16 and 31 of Block 1. All existing structures that are proposed remain with the subdivision of the property must comply with the setback standards of the R-8 district or be removed prior to city engineer's signature on the final plat. Additionally, staff recommends that the existing homes connect to city utilities and terminate their access to North Meridian Road with the first phase of development and since the existing home s will no longer have access to North Meridian Road, the property owner will have to coordinate with the city's addressing specialist to obtain a new street address for both of those homes. There is an existing outbuilding on Lot 31, which is this lot here that would look into the required street yard setback with the subdividing of the property. The UDC restricts detached accessory dwellings from being located in this setback and the applicant is requesting that the City Council allow the accessory building Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 20 of 44 to remain on the property in its current location. Staff recommends that the structure be removed with the development of the first phase, unless approved to remain by Council. I just wanted to make sure you're aware of that. But it's not -- you can see the formal phasing plan. The applicant has indicated that the multi- family portion of the site will be phase one and the single-family portion will be phase two. As I said this, this portion here that I'm kind of outlining is -- is phase one. Access is proposed for the site via one access to North Meridian Road for the multi-family portion of the project and it will be an extension of an existing -- an existing driveway and the single-family portion will be provided from the subdivision to the south, which is the Salisbury Lane Subdivision via a stub street that currently exists to the property. ACHD has approved the connection to North Meridian Road for this portion of the project and some correspondence there from the highway district they have indicated that they are -- they are warning -- or in discussions with the applicant on the exact location of -- of that access and maybe the applicant can address that a little bit further as part of his presentation. So, having said that, Council will also have to approve the access -- direct access to North Meridian Road. So, of Council does not approve the access to North Meridian Road, the applicant will have to redesign the project so that the multi-family portion would take access through what they are calling their single-family portion in some way, shape or form. The applicant is proposing one common driveway in the project. The common driveway should comply with the standards listed in the UDC, unless limited by a significant geographic feature or separated by a minimum of five foot wide landscape common -- common lot. All properties taking access from -- that front the common drive are required to take access. So, the proposed common drive is here, so these lots would have to either provide a five foot landscape strip or take access from that common driveway. A 25 foot wide street buffer is required along North Meridian Road, which is considered an arterial street and it's required to be landscaped in accord with the UDC, which requires a mixture of trees and shrubs. The buffer width along North Meridian Road should be measured from the back of curb or the ultimate curb location as determined by the Ada County Highway District. A minimum of ten percent of qualified open space is required to be provided for this development and based on the area of the preliminary plat, which is approximately 10.4 acres, a minimum of 1.04 acres of qualified open space is required to be provided as set forth in the UDC. The applicant is proposing that approximately 1.59 acres or 15.3 percent qualified open space for the development, which consists of half the street buffer along North Meridian Road and an internal pathway that connects the multi-family portion of the site to the single family portion. A micropath lot and internal common open space, which appear to comply with the requirement. Based on the area of the preliminary plat, city code requires that a minimum of one qualified amenity to be provided. The applicant proposes to provide a bocce ball court, internal pathways, and gazebo or plaza, a community garden and an internal grassy area, which is at least 50 feet by 100 feet in the area in accord with the UDC. The applicant has submitted some conceptual building elevations. This is the multi-family portion and the rest is single family homes that we have included here. Building material Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 21 of 44 consists of a mix of board and batten siding, horizontal and vertical lap siding, stone veneer, corbels and architectural shingles. Staff believes the proposed elevations comply with the architectural standards manual and the design standards set forth in the UDC. Did receive written testimony from a neighbor Ted Williams, as well as the applicant's representative Steve Arnold. With that staff is recommending approval of the project and I will stand for any questions. Yearsley: Thank you. Are there any questions? Oliver: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Oliver. Oliver: If I could just ask a quick questions, Josh, if I could. They are in the midst right now of widening that intersection on Meridian and Ustick. Will that impact that subdivision to where it will be one as well there or will that be closer to Ustick to where they are widening that? Beach: The staff report from the highway district has indicated that that is already at it's -- it's already been constructed to where it needs to be, so they are not asking for any additional right of way for this length. So, it shouldn't impact. Oliver: Okay. Thank you. Parsons: Mr. Chairman? Just for clarification on that. Additional right of way isn't required, but with that rebuilding of the intersection it will extend past the front of this property, so there will be some impacts to this -- to the frontage of this property. Oliver: That helps a lot. Thank you. Yearsley: Thank you. Any other questions? With that would the applicant like to come forward. Please state your name and address for the record. Arnold: Chairman, Members of the Commission, for the record my name is Steve Arnold. I'm with A-Team Land Consultants. 1785 Whisper Cove, Boise. 83709. I think staff did a great job covering overall. Let me see if I can't hit some of the questions that came up, along with some of the visioning that we had putting this project together. When you're dealing with two existing homes there is several challenges that go into laying this out and I will get into that, but the read off -- we did dedicate right of way and we have been working with the highway district to the expansion of the roadway and the location of the driveway we are currently working with the district. We may end up shifting it a little bit south, but that's not going to impact the site layout whatsoever. And as I stated, the right of way has been dedicated and the buffer and the whole sites been designed around the expansion of the road way. Going to some of the buildings. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 22 of 44 These are -- on the multi-family -- you have seen these before. You have seen me present these -- the pinwheel type design where each of the entrance -- each side of the building has its own entrance where we don't have any one person living above the other and we have strategically placed those south adjacent to the residential portion. We had one four-plex building that's adjacent to a single family to the south. Those are the majority of the styles of the buildings that we are doing. The eight-plex building it's a little bit different. We have four down and four above, but we have tried to model the same architectural styles that we are doing on the four-plex units. So, that the nice thing about putting the other four-plexes -- which is the pinwheel design south is they, blend very well with single family and we put these adjacent to our single family homes there, too. Single family buildings will be in the range of 1 ,500 up to probably 2,300 square feet, which is very compatible with the adjacent uses. One thing to note here, too, the developer of this project is also the homeowner of the five acres , which is -- I will call it the Ida Sweet, her old home. So, they are planning to build there and they are also the homeowner. He will be the builder of the multi-family, along with the builder for the single-family. So, our developer in this case has got quite a bit of interest in building a nice product. And as presented earlier tonight, you can see that we are adding additional open space, additional amenities to the project to help enhance and make this a nice subdivision . One of the challenges that we face was we have got two fairly large homes that are up along Meridian Road and we looked at doing office along Meridian Road, but the -- there is quite a bit of higher demand for the multi-family, so that was kind of the natural dividing point that everything east of the single -family homes we were going to do a separate product type, then, everything that was west of the single- family homes and, then, tie in the single family homes to the new single family home to the west, because that blended well with the neighborhood. We are providing a pathway from this site to future connect to the church site north of us, so we are constrained by the church there. We only had one stub straight into this development, into the backside of this from the subdivision to the south. There wasn't anything stubbed east -- or, excuse me, west -- from the west east to us, so we are constrained with that six acres to just one access point. We did look at also connecting the single -- the multi-family with a drive aisle going west to the single family, but we understood that there was concerns with the neighbors to the south and the perceived additional traffic that we would have on that. Because we were able to work with the highway district and split the traffic patterns, we took the multi-family east to Meridian and, then, combined all the single-family west and south through the existing sub . Traffic volumes -- and to give you an idea for the traffic on the road to the south, Cedric Drive, it's got approximately 352 trips per day on it, you know, we are going to add approximately 290. The threshold for these roads are between 1,000 and 2,000 vehicle trips per day. So, the additional traffic, although it's not welcomed, it is well within ACHD's threshold and, as stated earlier, ACHD has reviewed this and has approved the site plan. Some of the things that -- other thoughts that went into our development. We located the park very central. We added the community garden as one of the amenities. We are finding that those are often Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 23 of 44 used and well utilized and also central we have the gazebo and bocce ball court and all this is going to be shared between the multi-family and the single family uses. One thing to note, too, is -- and we are asking that the shop remain and I think staff has left that fairly open. The shop to the south to the house, it's an outbuilding that is in the setback that needs to not be in, but we are -- we found it difficult to try to lay this out any other way to make it fit and that's one of the constraints that you get when you're laying out a subdivision with existing homes on it, is making everything fit and work well and smoothly on it. There are going to be two separate HOAs, one for the single-family and one for the multi-family and as staff has suggested, we will -- but they are currently connected to -- existing homes are connected to city services, but I envision that we will have to modify those connections to take the infrastructure , the sewer and water, to the west. We have read through all of the staff conditions, the ACHD conditions, and we are in compliance with all those. So, that being said, I will stand for any questions. Yearsley: Thank you. Are there any questions? No? Thank you. I have quite a few people here signed up and this does go to the record. There is just enough that -- I apologize, I don't want to slaughter your names, so I'm going to open it up to anyone wishing to testify please raise your hand . This gentleman in the front, he had his hand up first. Yes. You. If you want to come forward and testify. And, please, state your name and address for the record. Grossman: My name is Mike Grossman and I'm at 3056 Northwest 3rd Street, Meridian, Idaho. And I will apologize first, because I have no legal background, no government background, and this is new to me. So, if I stick my foot in my mouth I apologize in advance. I would like to state that I would not even be here tonight if it was not for the multi-family proposal. I'm in an R-4. Most people on the west side of Meridian Road are R-4 and they want to take it to an R-15. So, they want to go from a low density to a high density is my understanding. I would also like to say -- and, once again, I'm not familiar with the procedure, so if I overstep my bounds I apologize, but we have not had very much communication with the developer. He has sent out a letter. We had a meeting at the builder's house, which is where the outbuilding is occupied and I asked to have a plat map at that time and said, no, that he would e-mail. So, several of us signed up for that e-mail and to my knowledge, talking with some of my neighbors and myself, that e-mail or no further communication had happened. So, when we got this information just recently there has been changes from what the original proposal was and that is basically to increase in both areas . Now, the single family was a very small increase, but it was an increase and the multi-family is just outside the box. When you take in consideration what someone has already brought up about the highway, I don't know if any of you live over there , but they are pulling houses out of there right now at the corner of Meridian and Ustick and that road system -- I'm not sure how long it will take, but are going to change that from Meridian Road clear to Cherry Lane. They are also going to increase from Ustick to Linder. While some of that might alleviate the traffic, but at current time -- and Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 24 of 44 I'm sorry I do not understand, I could not -- I read all 31 pages of this and I'm not the best at reading. My wife is sitting back there nodding her head yes. But I cannot see the completion date about -- with ACHD -- and I probably apologize, I didn't do my due diligence -- I probably got three minutes, but I do have the head of our household -- or homeowners association member here Trent Clemmons and he is let me -- if it's all right with you, to continue on as representation of Parkway Subdivision. Yearsley: So, just for that deal, those people who were in Parkway Subdivision, you are speaking on behalf of them and that they will not be allowed to testify and if they are in agreement with that, then, we will let you have the seven more minutes. Grossman: Well, to my knowledge Trent is the only one here, so you can ask him. He's the actual president. Yearsley: Okay. So, we will give him -- he was in agreement and so we will give him seven more minutes. Grossman: So, to go through this -- and, once again, I reiterate that I would not probably be standing in front of you had it not been for what I consider -- and sorry for my poor verbiage, but somehow when I got into this process -- my wife works for a commercial developer and she's just kind of shaking her head looking at me, but it seems like to me -- and I'm not trying to be rude here, but it seems like the developer is in the old days, because I'm an old-timer that when you went to buy an automobile and you would go in and you would ask for a price and they would come back with a, no, no and you go back and forth and back and forth. So, I hope that's not what the developer is doing. You probably have not seen that, but it seems like to me somewhat there is a bait and switch on some of the information that we have been given as to where we are moving forward and I will go through this real quick -- and I don't know -- I have tried -- do you want a page number of where I'm referring to? Would that help? Or would you want me just to go on or how would you like me to proceed real quick? Yearsley: If you want to specify at least the -- the -- Grossman: The section? Yearsley: The section number. Yeah. Grossman: Okay. Yearsley: Yeah. Grossman: Okay. So, the first -- sorry. Okay. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 25 of 44 Yearsley: Go ahead. Grossman: The first section number is 3.07 .02 and insured will provide safe routes and access to schools, parks, and other communities. Under, once again, the construction currently, if this is going to be approved soon, which I don't get, I would like it to be tabled until the construction or a continuance no matter which way the Council votes, but that is not a safe environment. There is a home -- and I think it's for -- I have not researched it, but it is on the left side by a horse pasture and the home I think is for mentally challenged young people. The bus stops there, which I don't care, but it becomes a real problem currently. Going forward when they improve the lanes it's not -- there is sometimes 30 minutes to get those poor kids off and get them to their hands -- the caretakers. Meantime, people break the law, they are now passing and it could cause a dangerous accident and I'm not sure that it hasn't. Section 3.07.02, once again, the construction is horrible and the timing of this proposal is -- is not good, if I'm reading this right. The car count survey that was stated in this goes clear back to 2014 and, as we all know, Meridian has drastically changed in that period. So, I would propose a new car count before there is a decision made. On section I believe 11-2A-2, I'm not quite sure -- and maybe this is why I was never a mathematician, but I do not believe the spaces that they are stating for the multi- complex, R-15 high density, is adequate. With a mathematician -- mathematical where they came up with 96 spaces, but they are going to put in an extra five. Now, that's allotting two cars per occupant of a multi, which is probably something they have researched. But my question is to you, do these people never have any company? Do they never have any teenage drivers? If you go down a little bit farther on Meridian Road and you look at Aaron Valley and you look at the private road any Saturday, Friday night, that road is packed with cars, because there is not enough places for them to park in that complex, to the point I think it jeopardizes and hinders emergency vehicles. I promise I'm trying to get through this. I'm not sure why -- and I know some of my neighbors will be against me on this, but I'm not sure why we are having just a pathway, instead of an actual access for the single-families through the multi-complex, other than the builder owning a home there, and Mr. Sweet my understanding was still there, maybe somebody else is, with those two existing homes will basically have no impact traffic wise. Absolutely none. So, my question is why is it for them to propose to have no problems traffic wise an d, yet, for us as neighbors and people across the street, people to the other subdivision, which is, to my understanding if I read properly, which is an R-4 also, why should we have to deal with that situation? And staff I believe recommended -- and, I'm sorry here, I'm not seeing a reference. I think it's under 7.21. No. That's the square footage. I apologize. It's a reference to the outbuilding existing. It seems somewhat ironic that that belongs to a builder of one of the -- that's going to build in that subdivision and I may be wrong on this, but if I read this correctly, the single family will not be allowed to have exterior buildings, but yet that location will be able to. And it's coming out of there from Mr. Sweet, whose plans have changed. Anyway, I appreciate your time. I hope that we will take into that Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 26 of 44 consideration and because of the multi-problems, I would ask you to either deny or at the least have a continuance until the construction is addressed. I thank you and have a good evening. Yearsley: Thank you. Who wants to be next? The gentleman in the back. Name and address, please, for the record. Tucker: Hello. My name is Todd Tucker. Address 2857 North Fairglen Avenue here in Meridian, Idaho. I would -- I guess full disclosure, I am a city planner for Boise City, so I will just put that on the record, but I am in full support of this project. The density -- the density is what this area needs. We are at a very closest intersection of two arterial roadways. That's generally where we want to see density is at -- on arterial roadways. We are also very close to a large regional park. We are also very close to services where people need to -- to buy things and so this is the perfect place to have a higher density . If you look at the project overall, yes, they are asking for what's considered medium density residential up -- up front and lower density towards the existing single-family residential properties. The overall project there is only seven units per acre, which I would not consider that to be even medium density. In Boise City we would consider that to be low density, to have less than eight units per acre. So, the density might actually -- could even be higher I think. As far as the design of the buildings, they are great. As Mr. Arnold stated, we are seeing quite a bit of these throughout the Treasure Valley. It's a great design. It puts windows on all sides. It puts doors on all sides. And so we got a nice presence on the street where you have got doors and windows and eyes on the street, which is very -- very good in the planning world. We like to see that. The single-family residential is putting like yards to like yards. Mostly we have backyards matching backyards and it's about a 1.5 to one ratio, which is very good as far as matching those -- those yards and the density there. It's got good landscaping . It's got great access. I think, you know, some of the concerns about traffic, local roads, ACHD allows up to 2,000 vehicle trips and you're not even going to get to a thousand, even with this development and with the widening of Meridian Road it can accommodate that traffic. I am in support of the project for a little bit of a selfish reason, I think with density comes transit and I'd like to see transit in this area. Meridian doesn't have really good transit. Like I said, I live very close to this. I work in Boise. I'd like to see a bus system. We are never going to get transit out in this area unless we have higher density. Ustick Road is a great road to support transit. This is a great project. Very close to Ustick Road where if we get a lot of -- if we get more people in this area we are going to get a higher likelihood of getting transit in this area and I think that's going to be a benefit not only for Meridian, but for the valley as a whole. And so that will conclude my -- my comments, but just on the whole I would like to say that I support this project, it has a lot of good planning concepts behind it, and I think the design is very well laid out and I support this project. Thanks. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 27 of 44 Yearsley: Thank you. The gentleman in the back. You, with the bald head. I would say that, because I'm getting there close to you as well, so -- Lewis: No offense taken. Thank you very much. My name is Jim Lewis and my address for the record is 101 West Sedgewick Drive in Meridian. 83646. So, I am in the Salisbury Lane Subdivision. I will try and keep my comments brief and they are kind of more general. I have several concerns about this project. Number one, obviously, it has been addressed in regard to the traffic on -- you know, I live in the cul-de-sac that is very close to Meridian Road off Sedgewick and, obviously, with increased traffic through there that is a concern with this stub road coming through from the single family. I also do have concerns about this overall project becoming more of a rental community. Salisbury Lane, while, obviously, there is -- there are rental houses within the subdivision , there -- we still have a large number of owner-occupied residences. I think if you look at the size of the -- of the plots and, you know, it being so close to multi -- multi- residential, I think that those are -- kind of lend themselves to being a rental type community after a couple years. If you look at the subdivisions further south of me, I think pretty much there are -- a considerable portion are owner-occupied, which is -- you know, affects the character of the area, which we would like to retain. So, that being said, kind of the second component is the two existing houses on there. I think my one concern is whether the developer at some point is going to come back and request a variance or to try and put additional properties on that. It seems very -- kind of an odd mix of three different components of housing here, so I have some concerns about what the future of that may look like. And, then, in terms of the -- the multi-family residential, you know, what a lot of communities are trying to do is develop what are so -called lifestyle communities that are -- that appeal a lot to Millennials, which is, obviously, an increasing demographic. You know, a lot of Millennial renters statistically look for amenities, such as a swimming pool, such as athletic facilities. This complex, on the other hand, offers a community garden, a gazebo, and a bocce ball court, none of which are likely to be used in any sort of, you know, extensive manner whatsoever. Let's be honest here, it's just to meet the minimum requirements for open space and amenities, but it's not going to do anything to encourage long-term renters or long-term individuals within this complex. Finally, I think the big question mark is in regard to what happens on Meridian Road, because this access road and, of course the, ACHD project, will it be restriction to right turns only, because that is so close to the Ustick and Meridian Road intersection? ACHD could very well come back and say that that would be a right turn only, in which case those residents would, then, have problem accessing areas north for the commercial districts or in terms of coming back from any commute pattern. Thank you for your time. Yearsley: Thank you. Who wants to be next? Please. Come forward. Name and address for the record. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 28 of 44 Hitchcock: Clay Hitchcock. 93 West Sedgewick and some of the thunder has already been taken out of some of my comments, but I'm going to jump on what Jim just got through saying there and one of -- I'm going to start off -- one of the first things that I'm going to say is I think the traffic study of 352 a day versus 290 -- I would challenge where those numbers came from. It just doesn't seem -- in terms of today's world, it just seems like more than that to me . The other thing -- there has been a total lack of communication between the developer and the residents around the area. The only thing I received and I feel real inadequate doing here -- I had a little three-by-five card that came over from the city planning, but it wasn't even this complete plan that I saw here. So, you know, I had my magnifying glass and I was looking at it. I tried to navigate your website, but I couldn't find the details there either. So, the t raffic that's going to be coming down through -- through Sedgewick from the residential areas there, in terms of the number of residential areas there versus how many are down on our street, you know, I can see a significant increase in traffic going through there and there has already been two points brought up about , you know, we are waiting what's going on with the Meridian project versus now kind of integrating that into what this project is going to do in terms of people turning out and turning right on Meridian if they are going down to the freeway or, you know, trying to get on Ustick, which I don't see any access to Ustick for these people that are here. So, as far as doing this development for future transit projects, I think you got a little ways to wait on something like that. Thank you. Yearsley: Thank you. Anybody else? Please. Come forward. Name and address for the record, please. Carver: My name is John Carver. I live at 730 West Claire, which is at the end of Sedgewick. Sedgewick is virtually one of two little roads that I can use to get in. Indian Rocks and Sedgewick are the only way that I can get into where I -- which is called Vallencourt at the end of that. I have heard nothing from anybody. Now, they may not think that I -- first of all, this is -- I mean it's a stone's throw away from my house and , secondly, nobody bothered to tell us what was going on. So, I heard about this tonight, so I'm unprepared. There is a perfectly good park across the street, by the way. You don't need bocce balls and you don't need gazebos. As was mentioned earlier, that's part of a smokescreen. We have a lovely little gazebo in our neighborhood, too. I think I have seen three people use it in nine years. They are not used. This thousand cars that ACHD has come up with, how on earth did they come up with that kind of a number? How do they determine that's safe? Has anybody stopped to think about all the kids that live in that neighborhood ? There are any number of kids that are on -- just on the edges of these cul-de-sacs these gentlemen were talking about. I drive very, very slowly when I go down that street , because I know there are kids and I know how kids act. The biggest problem I have with all of this -- two of them. One is you cannot access this from Ustick. Why not? That would take a lot of the pressure off of Sedgewick for starters. But they might lose a lot doing that. And multi -- multi-families, are we talking low Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 29 of 44 income? What are we talking about here? We just -- the term is 48 dwelling units of what sort? And where is the money coming from? Is HUD involved in this? Because I heard that HUD is cutting out of a whole lot of these programs and if they do where is the money going to come from to finish those projects ? And to have just one access. This is all directed to -- to make it easy on the folks that live in those two houses now, as was mentioned earlier. They are giving up nothing and they are making a ton of money doing this. They could take a road and put it right between their houses and go right on back in. But, again, they might lose a lot that they could sell. This is very convenient for them, but they are not thinking of the rest of us and when I bought my house nine years ago, about 20 minutes before the market fell apart, I paid a hell of a lot of money for that house and I'm nowhere close to getting it back. You do this -- you allow this to happen in its present form -- I don't mind houses back there, but this multi- family stuff and only one ingress and egress -- what does the fire department say about that by the way? I will stand for any questions. Yearsley: Thank you. Carver: Thank you for your time. Yearsley: Anybody else? Name and address for the record, please. Drouillard: Jeanette Drouillard of 166 West Sedgewick. Some of the things I'm going to say have already been said. The first concern is the multiplexes out on Meridian Road. Originally we were told at the first meeting they would be four, not eight, which seems to be overstated. Our next concern is how many parking places per unit are there going to be ? How many guest parking? How many extra cars per unit? Sometimes there is three or four cars per unit. So, where are all these people going to park? They can't park on Meridian Road. Are they going to come over and park along -- into Sedgewick? That is a big concern of ours. And, then, also I was told that -- I don't know how soon this will happen, but that they will be coming onto Meridian Road, but they will have to turn right, they will not be able to go left, excuse me, and so those people that really want to go left will probably turn into Sedgewick, go into our first cul-de-sac, turn around, go back out and go left. That is a real concern, because we are already overloaded on Sedgewick. On Sedgewick we have 40 houses. We have a subdivision behind us, which is Salisbury -- what's it called? Yes. And there are 60 homes back there. They use Sedgewick and they have an alternative to use Indian Rock, which I have talked to many people that live in that subdivision , they do not like to go out Indian Rock, because they have four dips in the road to slow them down. It is a higher profile of cars lined up on the street and so I would say out of the 60 houses probably 40 to 45 use Sedgewick to get to Meridian Road. Our road, other than the third party or, you know, company, doesn't have a lot of cars on the road and we do have a speeding problem down Sedgewick. We have the 60 homes behind us, the 40 in our subdivision, and now they are going to add 29 houses coming out of this new subdivision , so that is 60 cars a day Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 30 of 44 more just on Sedgewick and our other concern is why is -- is there only one outlet for that subdivision? All of those homes are going to have to come out on one road and it just seems like the impact is going to be tremendous on Sedgewick and just trying to get out on Meridian Road, even if it is four lanes, it is going to be a tremendous impact on the people. There is houses, there is -- you know, living in the subdivision all the UPS and all these -- Yearsley: Your time is up. If you could wrap it up, please, I would appreciate it. Drouillard: Okay. Thank you. Yearsley: Thank you. Anybody else that would like to testify? Please come forward. Simunich: I am Joe Simunich and I live it 2715 Venable Avenue. I have lived in that area for 47 years and most of these subdivision projects there is no address made to the irrigation. It's just left to the developer to do what he wants. So, I don't know -- there is some pipe there along -- in the front of this subdivision there is a lateral that goes south, the lateral goes north and there is also a measuring weir and I don't know if this is going to be reconstructed by the developer or Ada County Highway District when Meridian Road widens there from Ustick south. Can you -- can someone answer that for me? Yearsley: When we have the applicant come back after everyone's talk ed I will have him answer that question, because at this point I can't answer that question, so we will have him answer that question for you when he comes back up. Simunich: I just want to reiterate that these -- some of these developers do what they want. For instance, about two years ago at 9:00 o'clock Nampa- Meridian Irrigation called me and said there is water coming out behind a lot on Indian Rocks Street, 150 inches of water, nobody knows where it's coming from, because Nampa-Meridian has no control on the laterals and the developer that did Indian Rocks did not close off the pipe. Somebody figured they needed to irrigate, they closed off a box and the water came out behind Indian Rock Street. So, it's important that we take a look at irrigation in the subdivisions. Thank you very much. Yearsley: Thank you. Is there anybody else that would like to testify? Please. Thomas: Good evening. My name is Nick Thomas. I reside at 2975 North Meridian Road. The second house in question. And I appreciate the time you have given us all to come here tonight. I -- I would like to appreciate those that have commented so far. They are passionate and that's great. I want to live in this house for a long time and I want people that are passionate about where they live surrounded by me. And I realize this isn't a perfect project. Nothing's Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 31 of 44 perfect. It's what the developer has put together with what was left. This could become a strip mall, it could become all kinds of things. I appreciate that it's a place for me to live with my wife and kids and we can enjoy the neighborhood together and I like what's planned. I appreciate the concern of the traffic. I drive up and down Meridian Road every day. Imagine right now how it is to get access on without -- with just a private driveway. With ACHD helping out and with the requirements here, it's going to be great for the community. I only have one request, because I am the second in question with the detached garage, I'd like to keep it -- I'd like to have a variance for it. My wife and kids and I would love to get a boat someday and park it in the garage. If I tear it down I spend the money building another garage and never buy the boat. So, that's selfish on my part. But I appreciate your time. Thank you. Yearsley: Thank you. Into the microphone. No. No. We have got to get it on record, so -- sorry. Name and address for the record, please. Brown: Wayne Brown. 2858 Springwater. And I did mark, no, I didn't want to speak, but -- Yearsley: No, you're more than welcome to speak. Brown: However, I heard some things tonight that kind of disturbed me. So, I will make it very brief. Everybody talks about Sedgewick. Well, I live on Spring Water. There are four houses on Spring Water and the total impact is going to come right out past by my house. We have lived there since 2002 and did I know that there was a stub street when I bought there? Yes, I did. Did I think that I would be impacted like this development? No, I did not. However, I think when it comes down to economics, as this gentleman said, my house is going to be worth about half, because nobody wants to buy it, because there is 97 cars going by my house every day. Thank you. Yearsley: Thank you. Please. Enzler: Good evening. My name's Kyle Enzler. I'm at 3001 North Meridian Road. So, I'm the big, bad developer, builder, but I'm also the homeowner and a little bit of background. We actually searched out this project, because as a builder we build custom homes and we don't build spec homes, we don't build production homes. Everybody we build for is a friend or somebody that's personally referred and we have a lot people coming to us -- in this particular area there is not a second home -- there is Corey Barton and there is older homes, but there is not a second home option. So, there are -- a lot of our friends are moving out to Bainbridge and Paramount and Eagle and other places and they were looking for a community and a product that was nice that they could stay in the area, they could stay by the park, and we were part of that, my wife and I, we have three kids. So, obviously, in planning this we -- all of the comments that were made tonight I appreciate. Obviously, as a father we have Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 32 of 44 the same concerns, thinking about traffic and kids and our little kids on bikes and everything else and we went into this with that in mind of how could we plan a really nice community that we could live in and I was thinking back when I was 14, I -- one of my first jobs was a development my father did years ago and I -- I was out there shoveling dirt and what I liked about it was it was a mixed -use project, it had multi-family, it had nice residential homes and as I got older one of my first jobs I could actually afford the -- to live on that site. I actually moved into one of the apartments. So, these apartments that we are building, as talked about, they are a pinwheel design, which if you know about the construction of them, they cost more money to build. There is a lot more cost that goes into it. There is granite in there. Our price point for our rents are higher. We are trying to attract people that want to stay the re. Say with the homes, you know, they are -- in fact, we -- where we had our community meeting we invited everybody to our house, because that's the kind of community we are trying to create. So, we are super excited about this -- this project, to be able to use the existing houses, which were built in the '90s, they are not tearer downer houses, they are -- they are houses that, you know, are worth keeping and -- and I feel like staff has done a great job in recommending how we can meet the requirements -- as you can see the extra open space that we did, the extra amenities we did were because we care about living here on site in this project and so I appreciate your time. Thank you. Yearsley: Thank you. Anybody else? Please. Name and address for the record, please. Steiger: My name is Janice Steiger and I own a home at 2881 North Spring Water. That just borders the -- what we have here and the only thing that I want to say about it is everybody has said a lot of stuff. I am opposed to it. I just think it's -- a development of that size needs to have more accesses out of what they are developing, instead of going through other neighborhoods and everywhere else. They need to have access off of Ustick. Meridian Road where they are coming -- where the multi-family is going to be coming out is a two lane right now. I know that they are going to expand that to a four-lane. I'm not sure when. I know it's on the plan. But at the very least should it not wait until it is four lane, so all that traffic can have somewhere to come out on. This is really close to Ustick and you can't get in and out of there and if you bring all that development - - wait until there is the infrastructure to support the traffic and don't go through everybody else's subdivision, make more accesses to Ustick or Meridian Road and wait for infrastructure to support it. Yearsley: Thank you. Anybody else? Thank you. Would the applicant like to come forward? Arnold: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, for the record again, Steve Arnold, A-Team Land Consultants. I will try to address as quickly as I can the majority of the concerns. Again, the number one that came up that I hear Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 33 of 44 repeatedly is the traffic and the traffic generation number that I got, that's from ACHD, the 2010 traffic count. I did send that to staff and show that comes directly off of their information, the 352 trips per day on Sedgewood Drive, and, again, we are adding 290. The traffic counts you essentially assume ten trips per household. We have got 27 new, but we are adding the two existing homes, so that's how I come up with the 290. The site is constrained. There was only one stub street provided into it -- into the back portion and we have got development that occurred west of the site with no stub to us and we got development that is -- that has occurred north of us without a connection . My fear is if -- and we didn't connect the multi-family to the single-family for a planning purpose. We were trying to keep, you know, the two separate uses -- the traffic separated and not increase potential additional traffic onto Sedgewick Drive, because we knew there was a concern there with the traffic. We did however -- and as a staff recommendation and we agreed with it -- we -- we did provide pedestrian connectivity to the north. So, we do have a pedestrian pathway that will get future pedestrians to the -- to the church or to the playing fields there and/or north to the -- to the park site and so there was a lot of thought that went into how this site was laid out, how we can best make the uses compatible and try to keep like uses next to like uses with the single family and the existing and, then, then, multi-family out closer to the arterial, as stated earlier tonight, you know, in hopes that we can have eventually density that would support transit in the future. There has been several comments about the changes in the plan, they are a bait and switch that's occurred. If anything has occurred we have gone down with -- working with staff on the density that we originally proposed. We have lost multi - family units and we have lost single family units and I apologize for anyone that I had -- did not e-mail the site plans to. I do have my e-mail on all the notifications and the public -- the neighborhood request. I have replied to everyone that -- you know, that responds to me. I have done this enough -- you guys have seen me here enough that I'm not going to bury my head and not reply to neighborhood concerns, so I apologize to any neighborhood that -- or neighbor that we did not get information to. Another issue came up about irrigation and you wanted me to address that. Our intent is -- when we develop this -- any pipes we -- any irrigation canals we pipe to and through. There has been an issue that I believe Mr. Simunich brought up about some flooding that had occurred. This property, because of the subdivision to the west of us, was -- they did not account for the tail water of our two five acres irrigating. So, there has been a problem with these two existing five acres when they irrigate there is flooding going on. Well, as a part of our development when we develop this site, we are going to provide pressure irrigation and all of that will be cleared up with -- with our development. So, there has been an irrigation issue out there that will be cleaned up as we develop. The driveway that's being proposed -- we have been working with ACHD and that's going to be a full access, so left-in, left-out, right-in, right-out. And, again, we wanted to keep traffic separated just for the concerns that we are hearing tonight. So, I think I have addressed the majority of the issues. If I have missed any I would certainly stand for questions. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 34 of 44 Yearsley: So, a couple of them was -- is this going to be a HUD home -- dealing with any HUD or urban -- a HUD project or is it not? Arnold: Mr. Chairman, these rents are going to be anywhere in that 975 to 1,000 plus. This is not a planned low-income subsidized housing. These are -- these are high end units. You can't put these types of -- you can't afford to build these type of units without getting the rent back and the intent is -- just as you heard talk about tonight is to get the high rents and to keep qualified people into the subdivision, so -- into the multi-family. And as it relates to the value of the single family homes, you know, we definitely see those as being in the mid 250s to 300, whereas that will actually help the comps for the residential neighborhood around us. So, they will increase with value. I don't see any issue with anyone losing value because of our subdivision. Yearsley: I know you mentioned it earlier, but the parking spots, per code how much is required and how much are you providing? Arnold: Mr. Chairman, two per unit, which would be 96. Parking -- I have a hard time saying this in front of a Boise city person, although he's gone. In Boise city we drop down to 1.24 or 1.5 and that's a problem. I mean I have had issues. But we have also -- where we can keep it two units of parking, it's plenty adequate and we are providing -- we have got 48 units. We are required to do 96. We are providing 101. Yearsley: Okay. And, then, the other one was talking about a transition from R- 4 to R-15. Can you kind of talk to that just a little bit? I think it was specifically to the -- to the west of your property. Arnold: I believe the R-4 is to the south of us. So, our lots -- the R-4 to the west and R-4 to the south, we are putting the R-8, which we believe, you know, between the R-4 and, then, the office north of us, is the natural planning progression of densities as you get closer to the arterials. So, our R-4 -- or, excuse me, our R-8 is in the back adjacent to the other residential densities and we are putting the R-15, the higher density, up near Meridian Road and the arterial. So, we are creating kind of a natural barrier with the existing homes and the density adjacent to the arterial and, then, lessening the density as you come closer to the existing single family homes. Yearsley: Okay. And that's -- that's exactly what I wanted to make sure that we understood. Any other questions? Fitzgerald: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Fitzgerald. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 35 of 44 Fitzgerald: Steve, the two eight-plexes are the ones to the north of the existing home and, then, the ones like to the east of the existing -- of the other existing home? Arnold: That's correct. They are away from the -- those are -- I know that they are going to be similar architectural styles. We have combined them. Instead of doing two four-plexes to try to increase areas of parking that we were doing. Originally we had four-plexes, but we were coming -- we figured it would make for a nicer product type getting more different buildings in there to do a true mixed use type of development. Fitzgerald: Okay. Thank you. Arnold: And place those away from existing single family. Yearsley: Thank you. Any other comments or questions? McCarvel: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: Could you speak to -- I know we had one person testify and I saw it in the staff report, the concern on fire equipment and stuff getting into that loop and the one access in there. Have you had comments from the fire department on that? Arnold: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner McCarvel, yes, we have had -- we had a pre-application meeting with fire. Because this is a loop road it was adequate and, then, also with our -- our access out onto Meridian Road. The alternative, if it was a problem, we would have pushed a connection between the single family and the multi-family, but that was not a concern by fire. Oliver: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Oliver. Oliver: I have just one question on -- looking at the homes facing Meridian Street, you have this upper, but are there also going to be fenced around those - - each of those multiplex family or will that just be open? Arnold: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Oliver, no, the -- most of the fencing -- we do have some screening for the mechanical units and, then, there is a little bit of fencing for the individual open space for them, but it's -- it's on their back patio, essentially, is partially fenced off. But the idea is have it open to landscaping and open along the -- there will be fencing on the perimeter of the subdivision, though. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 36 of 44 Oliver: Thank you. Yearsley: So, there was some -- some comment -- sorry, were you done? Oliver: Yes. Yearsley: There was some comment about adding -- basically putting a road in between the two homes and go out to Meridian, but if you did that you would still have to tie into the stub street off of Sedgewick, is that not correct? Arnold: That is -- Mr. Chairman, that is very correct. Yearsley: Okay. Arnold: When I worked at the highway district, we came up with that sign that, you know, this road is going to be extended in the future regardless of -- you know, I mean the whole idea of getting the stub is to have multiple in and outs and it's too bad that we didn't get one from the west and, then, to the north -- I guess there has been -- I didn't address that, but there was questions about why we are not getting a road going north and one of the problems was -- if you -- you have got the intersection of Ustick and Meridian Road. Even if we could, if there wasn't a development north of us, the offset of that intersection doesn't meet ACHD's requirements. So, you know, I would assume that's why, you know, we are not doing a public street, we are doing a pedestrian pathway, is to have those interconnected that way. Yearsley: Okay. Oliver: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Yes. Oliver: So, in relation to the pathway going north, that pathway connects to what outside of your property lines? Because there is a -- yeah, there is the church, but there is also the retirement -- Beach: Mr. Chair, if you look at the -- the aerial for that, the assisted living facility is here on the hard corner and, then, the church picks up this portion here. What you can't see in this aerial photograph is the church has since expanded significantly from this and they have added significant portion of additional parking on the site, so, essentially, will connect to the church. There is not a whole lot of additional open space to recreate in that area, but that could potentially get folks closer to the intersection and up to the park. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 37 of 44 Oliver: So, basically, what it just does, it connects to the church where they have a pavement and they can walk up to the park from there. Okay. Thank you. Yearsley: Thank you. Any other questions? Thank you. With no more questions, I would entertain a motion to close the public hearing on file number H-2016-0075. Fitzgerald: So moved, Mr. Chairman. McCarvel: Second. Yearsley: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Yearsley: Comments or thoughts? Fitzgerald: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commission Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald: This one is hard for me. I -- and I'm a -- and you all know that I like a mixed use -- mixed density projects. I think you do have a step up between residential homes, multi-family, and, then, you have a community -- or I mean an assisted living facility to the north. I think that's good. For some reason this just feels odd to me, though. I don't know if it's the layout or something. I'm not sure what it is, but something is not -- I don't know. I'm not -- I haven't totally made up my mind about where I'm headed. This just feels like we may have packed too much stuff into the -- onto the road or something is not -- I don't know. Something is not sitting well or perfect with me. I'm not sure if it's the eight- plexes or the stuff that's right up against Sedgewick to their south. If it would have been just on Meridian Road I think I would have been fine, but I think -- I don't know. It seems that we are maximizing the multi-family too much. Yearsley: One thing, if you look at those four-plexes along the south, if you look adjacent to that it's actually a common area -- Fitzgerald: Exactly. That's -- agreed. Yearsley: So, it does not -- it does -- I think it only backs up to maybe one or -- Fitzgerald: One house right there. Yearsley: Yeah. So -- Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 38 of 44 Fitzgerald: And that's actually what -- pulled up an aerial so I could see that, but -- Yearsley: Yeah. Any other comments? Oliver: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Oliver. Oliver: I, too, have some mixed feelings about this development . I do know that it's good to have mixed use and I know that any way we look at it that area is going to be filled in with something and -- and I don't know which is the lesser of two evils, to go one way or the other, but I think that if you look at this it does have some mixed use, which makes it nice and it is good access. What I worry about is putting anymore load on Meridian Road. But as far as the way it's set out, going out on to Sedgewick, it looks like that's about the only alternative we have and as far as the apartments, I think that's going to work out okay. So, viewing everything and knowing that something is going to hap pen, I think I would have to go with it. Yearsley: Thank you. McCarvel: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: Yeah. I have the same kind of odd feeling about this as everybody else. I think it -- it just -- it feels like it's got this little racetrack going around in there, but I would be -- obviously, it's just going to be homeowners in there using it, so, hopefully, you know, they pay attention and don't use it -- don't go around the corners real fast. But, yeah, it just seems kind of oddly disconnected, separated -- I'm not sure. Yearsley: You know -- and I have a tendency to agree with you, but I like the way that they did it, that they are -- because my -- one of my biggest fears -- if you would have connected the two streets together is you would have had more of the apartments trying to get out through Sedgewick. So, by doing that -- I like the fact that they are trying to limit the amount of people exiting into another subdivision. Unfortunately, they were kind of dealt a poor hand with development to the north and not a stub street to the -- to the west. You know, barring having to buy a couple of lots and adding an extra street, which, you know -- so, I kind of like the fact that they did that. It helps to minimize traffic there. I like the fact that they tried to put their commercial -- or their apartments to the front and tried to minimize impact to the adjacent subdivisions to the south. So, is it the best situation? It's probably not, but I do think it's a -- it's a good compromise I guess is what it -- and I understand -- I'm sorry, we can't have comments. And I Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 39 of 44 understand -- yeah. It is tough to have growth happening in your backyard. But the developer does have -- you know, as long as he is meeting the development -- an opportunity to develop it how he would like it, I think it works. I think it's minimal invasive to the adjacent subdivisions. Like I said, he could probably have done worse. It's hard to say. Fitzgerald: Yeah. Mr. Chairman, I think -- and I agree with exactly what you just said. I do think that the developer did a great job of trying to minimize traffic going into Sedgewick and that, so I do -- I give them a lot of credit for that. And I -- I mean it does help that the builder, developer is going to live there and I appreciate them bringing R-8 up against their own house, which is interesting. So, I mean at least they are putting themselves in the situation everybody else is in as well. I think my only comment was -- I mean somebody is going to develop there and it could be denser than it is right now overall. They could request that under the current -- the future land use map, so I think it -- could it be improved? Possibly. But I understand where you're going. Yearsley: And I think the change, you know, between what they have seen and -- and how it ended up being today, working with staff, making comments and recommendations to try to help minimize those impacts, I think was a lot of the reason for the change. Fitzgerald: And, Josh, in the future could we -- if we have something similar to this, can we see lot lines for the neighborhood around it, if the applicant doesn't provide it, so we can see what this -- what an R-4 -- or what the multi-family is up against, just so we can see it in the future. That would be helpful. McCarvel: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: Yeah. I mean my overall comment was just -- comment as far as on the overall design. I think they did a -- I do think they did a great job of trying to push most of the traffic from this directly out onto Meridian. Yeah. I t would have been ideal to have some sort of road to the north, but, obviously, they didn't get that and I think the density -- you know, your -- in the staff report we are actually looking at a gross density of 4.2. Even though it's an R -8, it's spread out -- I mean you have got the R-8 and the R-15, but the R-8 portion I think they said it's a gross density of 4.2 over there, so it -- it is a good transition of what should be expected there I think. Yearsley: Yeah. I agree. The one comment -- and I apologize to the homeowner -- the one shed that they are asking to keep, I don't know if I like that, having a shed in front of their house adjacent to the street. I know that's against city code and so I would recommend that it be removed. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 40 of 44 Oliver: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Oliver. Oliver: I also agree, because I was just sitting here thinking about it, that if they are in an HOA and the HOA say none of those allowed in the subdivision, that's not very fair when you look at somebody else, just because they were there, you get a variance to include that, so if you're going to be fair to everybody you have to play by the rules and I think that shed needs to come down. Yearsley: Yeah. McCarvel: Yeah. Mr. Chairman, I agree. I think if it was placed anywhere else, but it's right out there in the front where everybody has got to look at it and -- I agree it will probably have to go. Oliver: Sorry about the boat. Yearsley: So, with that, if there is no more discussion or comments I would entertain a motion. Oliver: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner Oliver. Oliver: I haven't been here for a while. Yearsley: I know. Oliver: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number H-2016-0075 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of September 1, 2016. Do I need to put the modifications in the -- Yearsley: No. It's already in the staff report, so -- Oliver: Okay. McCarvel: Second. Yearsley: I have a motion and a second to approve file number H-2016-0075. All in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 41 of 44 Yearsley: If you guys wouldn't mind permitting me, I would like to take a quick break if you would. So, we will stand for a quick recess. (Recess: 8:11 p.m. to 8:17 p.m.) D. Public Hearing for 2016 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendment (H-2016-0098) by City of Meridian 1. Request: Amend the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Text of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan as Follows: 1) Update the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) So That it Represents the Built Environment and Existing Land uses; 2) Update Various Text Through-Out the Document and the Goals, Objectives and Action Items Yearsley: All right. We would like to get started again. Next item on the agenda is the public hearing for H-2016-0098 for the Meridian Comprehensive Plan map and text amendment and let's begin with staff. McClure: Members of the Commission, thanks for having me here tonight. I'm before you to discuss a number of proposed changes to the city's Comprehensive Plan and to the future land use map. A little history. The previous Comprehensive Plan was reformatted to be fresh and adopted on April 19th, 2011. Since that time staff has yearly reviews of the policy statements within the Comprehensive Plan of the goals, objectives and action items and several of those reviews have results in a number of text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. This is the first city-initiated map amendment since the 2012 south Meridian update. All of the map amendments since this time have been entirely development driven. Broadly speaking, this Comp Plan application includes three types of changes, all of which staff considers to mostly be clean up. The first set of changes goes to the text of the Comprehensive Plan. Most of these are minor updates, names, references, or to inform of current efforts. The second half of the changes are to the policy statements in the Comprehensive Plan, the goals, objectives, and action items. Aga in, they are considered to be mostly clean up or status updates. Lastly, staff has proposed a number of future land use map changes. Some of these are rather significant, at least in times of - - at least in terms of the area of the map. All these, again , are still considered to be cleanups. For example, a number of school and park sites have been changed to a civil land use where previously -- currently they have a commercial or a residential designation. The reason behind this is that all of the older school Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 42 of 44 and park sites have the specific land use, so this is a consistency change. One of the reasons this is important is for land use analysis . I'm not planning to go through all the changes. There is a lot. So, I will stand for questions at the end if you have any specific ones. But I will go through a number of examples for each of the three categories I just mentioned. This slide shows a few proposed changes to the text of the Comprehensive Plan. Green underlined text represents new text. Red strike through text represents deleted text. The first here is just to show that the city has adopted a strategic plan since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted and it's important, so we are going to add it to the Comprehensive Plan. I should also note that the strategic plan has also been added to Chapter 7, which is the section that deals with all the adopted by reference documents. The second item here is just to show what a lot of these revisions are and that's minor. In this case we are changing Meridian School District and Joint Unified School District No. 2 to West Ada School District and this occurs in a number of locations. This slide shows a few proposed changes to the policy statements in the Comprehensive Plan. Again, the first item here is just a name change. We adopted the architectural standards manual at last year or early this year and the previous one was called the design manual. The second related item is just to show how we modified an existing guideline to take in what the original guidelines -- the design manual guidelines described. When we were for Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council for the adoption of the architectural standards manual, we told you about a number of site changes that were going to have to be removed, because they weren't an application and some of those will be making their way into the Comprehensive Plan or into the UDC. I think this is the only example where we are actually picking up from the old design manual and put it in the Comprehensive Plan. The third item here is just another example of the cleanup. And the fourth is just to show that in some cases it is not actually a change in the guidelines, it's just a change that we are responsible for and in this case the city cultural -- arts and cultural person is in the Finance Department and the baton is being passed from the Mayor's office to Finance. This slide shows a few of the land use changes. Red outlined areas are -- have been the Comprehensive Plan and in all areas where this has occurred this is because the county has removed this from our area of city impact or because of an adjacent area next to that has been removed and it's not hard to service. Green highlighted areas again are kind of the same. They are where the county has added to the area of city impact and where we are at adding a land use that didn't previously have one. In these cases where this has occurred we are just -- the adjacent land use is just being in this new area, so there is nothing weird or significant going on. Where changes to the existing future land use, again, this is kind of mostly where we had schools before, there was a few other areas where we have had office that were developed in a PUD and it had a residential designation, so -- and all of these cases were just changing the land use to match what is built and what was envisioned to remain there indefinitely. A number of other future elements have changed, so we have the school sites and fire stations and t hings like that. Those are currently identified with halos. Where those occur before and now, Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 1, 2016 Page 43 of 44 anywhere in that square mile we could have a park site or potentially fire station, something like that. The map has been updated to show that's no longer a possibility, so we can't actually put a park there anymore or can't put a fire station there anymore in a few locations where the parks and the fire department have identified needs. We have also added a State Highway 16 . That's a future addition to the map. We already have a number of other future roadways, so we are just showing the future Highway 16 extension on there now as well. Tonight city staff are requesting a recommendation of approval to Council for both the text and the map amendments. Next is a public hearing before City Council for approval and, lastly, next year we are planning to do again our annual review of the policy statement and, then, we will als o be looking to update the existing conditions report, which is an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan, which in learning it is very out of date. With that I'm happy to answer any specific questions you have, anything I have glossed over or didn't touch on, I will answer you if I can. Yearsley: Are there any questions? No? You look perplexed, Commissioner Fitzgerald, so I wasn't sure if there is something -- okay. You know, I think it looks very good. I think it cleans up a lot of stuff and I think the changes to the map I think look really good. So, you did a great job, so -- I guess if there are no questions, I would entertain a motion to recommend approval of these text and map changes to the City Council. McCarvel: Mr. Chairman? Yearsley: Commissioner McCarvel. McCarvel: After careful consideration of the testimony put before us, I recommend approval of the change to the map. Yearsley: And plan. McCarvel: And plan. Fitzgerald: Second. Yearsley: I have a motion and a second to recommend approval of the changes of the Comprehensive Plan and text -- a map and text amendment. All in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries: MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Yearsley: One last motion. Oliver: Mr. Chairman? Pl a n n i n g & Z o n i n g Co m m i s s i o n M e e t i n g Se p t e m b e r 1 , 2 0 1 6 It e m # 4 A : L a u r e l T o w n h o u s e s Zo n i n g / A e r i a l M a p 20 2 0 28 6 7 21 3 1 3015 3085 1965 3175 3067 22 8 9 3135 22 5 7 1875 3000 1800 2963 24 5 0 20 6 9 16 3 0 16 2 6 17 2 0 26 6 7 2 5 4 8 2 5 2 8 2 5 4 3 2 5 5 1 2 6 2 9 2 6 7 7 24 9 0 22 8 3 2 5 8 2 2 5 5 6 2 5 4 0 16 1 5 23 6 5 23 8 9 22 7 3 2962 3006 2 6 3 8 25 9 2 2 6 4 5 2 6 5 9 2 6 9 3 16 5 7 24 6 3 25 4 1 21 1 1 19 2 5 3044 24 0 0 22 3 5 23 2 1 2950 1940 3077 2949 19 3 7 18 6 9 17 5 1 2965 1789 2015 2989 3045 3023 2275 2971 2998 28 4 5 3055 1935 16 2 0 22 0 1 2 6 1 1 17 1 0 2 5 1 2 2 5 1 9 2 5 8 1 16 2 3 17 2 5 27 5 0 18 6 0 18 7 4 0 21 1 6 26 0 3 2 5 7 4 2 5 6 7 16 3 1 19 0 2 18 6 1 19 1 1 20 0 9 25 4 3 - 2 5 4 9 23 2 0 2 6 0 6 21 3 1 2264 2150 3010 2951 3 0 1 7 2955 23 4 7 16 4 3 17 1 5 19 1 6 18 7 3 2 5 3 7 2 5 7 5 24 0 0 24 0 0 TN - R R- 1 5 C-C R1 R- 4 0 C- G E O v e r l a n d R d S Eagle Rd E G o l d s t o n e D r E C o p p e r P o i n t D r S C e l e b r a t i o n A v e E G o l d s t o n e S t e d u d A v e E B l u e H o r i z o n D r E G a l a C t E C o p p e r P o i n t S t E B l u e T i c k S t E G a l a S t E G r i f f o n S t S L u x u r y L n E T a r p o n D r S A c c o l a d e A v e S W e l l s A v e S W e l l s A v e S B o n i t o W a y Pr e l i m i n a r y P l a t La n d s c a p e P l a n ( n o t a p p r o v e d ) Ex i s t i n g B r o w n s t o n e E l e v a t i o n s ( l i v e / w o r k u n i t s ) Pr o p o s e d T o w n h o u s e C o n c e p t u a l E l e v a t i o n s It e m # 4 B : H i l l ’ s C e n t u r y F a r m C o m m e r c i a l Vi c i n i t y / Z o n i n g M a p ""d RUT C- N R- 2 R- 4 R- 8 S E a g l e R d E A m i t y R d E L a c h l a n S t E W o o d v i l l e D r E T a c o n i c D r S S t o c k e n h a m W a y E L a G r a n g e S t E R o c k h a m p t o n S t E R o c k h a m p t o n S t E L a c h l a n S t E L a G r a n g e S t S T i n d a r i s P l S M a r t i n e l L n S Howry Ln S W a y l a n d A v e S S H i l l F a r m A v e S T a v i s t o c k A v e S P a l a t i n o A v e Re c o r d o f S u r v e y Pr e l i m i n a r y P l a t La n d s c a p e P l a n It e m # 4 C : M a d d y n V i l l a g e Zo n i n g / V i c i n i t y M a p Pr e l i m i n a r y P l a t La n d s c a p e P l a n Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s Bu i l d i n g E l e v a t i o n s 1 2 HCF Commercial Sub R-8 ZONE C-N ZONE YMCA City Park Amity Rd Marti & Dixie Hill’s Home 3 4 5 Access Waiver E. Hill Park St S. H i l l s d a l e A v e S. Ta v i s t o c k Av e E. Amity Rd 6 Water Main Condition 2.1.1 7 8 Q U E S T I O N S City of Meridian CoMprehensive plan ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ City of Meridian CoMprehensive plan Adopted April 19, 2011 resolution no. 11-784 Prepared by: City of Meridian Planning Division 33 E Broadway Suite 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone 208.884.5533 Fax 209.888.6854 Amended November 19, 2013 – Resolution No. 13-963 September 9, 2014 – Resolution No. 14-1011 and 14-1012 Month Day, 2016 - Resolution No. 16-XXXX ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ iCity of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Acknowledgements Mayor and City CounCil Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Brad Hoaglun Charlie Rountree David Zaremba Keith Bird planning and Zoning CoMMission Tom O’Brien Joe Marshall Steven Yearsley Scott Freeman Michael Rohm ii City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ iii Table of Contents City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 Plan Purpose and Scope ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Nature of the Plan......................................................................................................................................................................2 Plan History and Preparation ..................................................................................................................................................3 Plan Vision ....................................................................................................................................................................................4 Plan Structure .............................................................................................................................................................................4 Using this Document .................................................................................................................................................................5 Chapter 2 – Community Character ............................................................................................................7 Community Design ....................................................................................................................................................................7 Quality of Life and Livability ....................................................................................................................................................7 Healthy Initiatives ....................................................................................................................................................................10 Chapter 2 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items ................................................................................................................13 Chapter 3 – Strategic Growth ....................................................................................................................17 Area of City Impact ................................................................................................................................................................18 The Future Land Use Map .....................................................................................................................................................20 Residential .........................................................................................................................................................................................20 Commercial .......................................................................................................................................................................................21 Office .................................................................................................................................................................................................22 Industrial ............................................................................................................................................................................................22 Old Town .............................................................................................................................................................................................22 Mixed Use Designations ................................................................................................................................................................22 Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area ............................................................................................................................................34 Civic .....................................................................................................................................................................................................34 Parks ...................................................................................................................................................................................................34 Schools ................................................................................................................................................................................................35 Fire Stations.......................................................................................................................................................................................35 Entryway Corridors..........................................................................................................................................................................35 Future Planning and Referral Area ..............................................................................................................................................35 Transit Stations and Transit Friendly Development .................................................................................................................35 Symbols ..............................................................................................................................................................................................36 Housing ....................................................................................................................................................................................36 Transportation ........................................................................................................................................................................36 Transportation and Land Use Integration ................................................................................................................................37 Blueprint for Good Growth ............................................................................................................................................................37 Communities in Motion (CIM) .....................................................................................................................................................38 Alternative Transportation ..............................................................................................................................................................38 Downtown Transportation Network ............................................................................................................................................39 State Facilities ...................................................................................................................................................................................41 Supplemental Network Improvements ......................................................................................................................................41 Utilities and Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................................................42 Water Service ...................................................................................................................................................................................42 Sewer Collection ...............................................................................................................................................................................42 Sewage Treatment ...........................................................................................................................................................................43 Garbage and Recycling ..................................................................................................................................................................43 Irrigation .............................................................................................................................................................................................44 Power ..................................................................................................................................................................................................44 Natural Gas .......................................................................................................................................................................................44 Communications ..............................................................................................................................................................................44 Future Acquisitions Map ........................................................................................................................................................44 Chapter 3 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items ................................................................................................................45 Chapter 4 – Economic Excellence .............................................................................................................57 Economic Development .......................................................................................................................................................57 iv Table of Contents City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Business Enterprise Areas / Specific Area Plans ......................................................................................................................58 Chamber of Commerce .................................................................................................................................................................60 Chapter 4 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items ................................................................................................................61 Chapter 5 – Stewardship .............................................................................................................................65 Natural Resources ..................................................................................................................................................................65 Water ................................................................................................................................................................................................65 Soil and Vegetation...........................................................................................................................................................................65 Air Quality ..........................................................................................................................................................................................66 Energy .................................................................................................................................................................................................66 Sustainability .............................................................................................................................................................................66 Green Building ..................................................................................................................................................................................67 Recycling and Hazardous Waste .................................................................................................................................................67 Hazardous Areas......................................................................................................................................................................67 Special Areas and Historic Resources ................................................................................................................................68 Chapter 5 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items ................................................................................................................69 Chapter 6 – Public Services .......................................................................................................................77 Community, Social and Government Services ..................................................................................................................77 Education ...................................................................................................................................................................................77 Public Schools ...................................................................................................................................................................................77 Continuing Education ......................................................................................................................................................................78 Emergency Services ................................................................................................................................................................78 Police ...................................................................................................................................................................................................78 Fire and Ambulance ........................................................................................................................................................................79 Parks and Recreation..............................................................................................................................................................79 Arts and Entertainment .........................................................................................................................................................80 Libraries .....................................................................................................................................................................................80 Organizational Excellence .....................................................................................................................................................80 City Hall .............................................................................................................................................................................................80 Community Development Block Grant ......................................................................................................................................81 Property Rights ........................................................................................................................................................................82 Chapter 6 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items ................................................................................................................83 Chapter 7 – Implementation ......................................................................................................................87 Making the Plan Reality ..........................................................................................................................................................87 Alignment with Other Plans and Resources .............................................................................................................................87 Next Steps .........................................................................................................................................................................................88 Chapter 7 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items ................................................................................................................89 Glossary Terms ...........................................................................................................................................A-1 Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................B-1 Regulatory Takings Checklist ....................................................................................................................C-1 Future Land Use Map ................................................................................................................................D-1 Legend ..........................................................................................................................................................E-1 v Table of Contents City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan list of tables Table 3-1. Community Choices Forecasts ...................................................................................................................................18 Table 3-2. Future Land Uses within the City of Meridian Area of City Impact ..................................................................19 list of figures Figure 3-1. Mixed Use Neighborhood Concept Diagram ........................................................................................................25 Figure 3-2. Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Concept Diagram .........................................................................................26 Figure 3-3. Mixed Use Community Concept Diagram .............................................................................................................27 Figure 3-4. Mixed Use Neighborhood Center Concept Diagram .........................................................................................29 Figure 3-5. Mixed Use Regional Concept Diagram ...................................................................................................................30 Figure 3-6. Mixed Use Non-Residential Concept Diagram .....................................................................................................32 Figure 3-7. Adopted Pathway Network Map ...............................................................................................................................40 Figure 4-1. Business Enterprise Areas ...........................................................................................................................................59 vi City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 1 1 Chapter Chapter 1 – Introduction Meridian, Idaho is located in the southwestern part of the state, just west of the State’s capitol city, Boise (Figure I-1). Meridian is one of six cities in Ada County, Idaho. City limits encompass approximately 33 square miles, and the Area of City Impact contains 60 square miles. There are over 70,000 residents in Meridian, making it the third largest city in Idaho. To preserve some of the small town character and charm, while looking to progress as a community, the City enacts this Comprehensive Plan. Plan Purpose and Scope The purpose of the City of Meridian’s Comprehensive Plan is to integrate the concerns and expressions of the community into a document that guides the City on how to grow and develop. The plan uses maps, tables and narrative to Figure 1-1. MeriDiAN ViCiNiTY MAP Chapter 2 1 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan describe the City, provide a vision of a desired future, and recommend specific measures to reach that future. The required components of a comprehensive plan specified in the Idaho Code include private property rights; population; economic development; land use; natural resources; hazardous areas; public services, facilities, and utilities; transportation; recreation; special areas or sites; housing; community design; implementation; national interest electric transmission corridors, and any other component which may be necessary. One of the primary uses of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide direction for land use regulations, including zoning, as well as other implementation actions. Idaho Code § 67-6511 requires that: “The zoning districts shall be in accordance with the adopted plans.” All legislative requirements, specifically the Idaho Local Land Use Planning Act, are addressed in the plan. Idaho Code § 67-6508 (the Local Land Use Planning Act) provides for a planning process as follows: “Prepare, implement, and review and update a comprehensive plan, hereafter referred to as the plan. The plan shall include all land within the jurisdiction of the governing board. The plan shall consider previous and existing conditions, trends, desirable goals and objectives, or desirable future situations for each planning component. The plan with maps, charts, and reports shall be based on the following components unless the plan specifies reasons why a particular component is unneeded.” The plan is intended to work in concert with the City’s ordinances and specific area plans. It is based not only on the concerns and expressions of the community, but upon the Existing Conditions Report that is adopted concurrently as an addendum to this plan. The Existing Conditions Report includes background information and analysis about the built and natural environment in Meridian today (2010), trends, and a strategic plan for the future. Together, the Existing Conditions Report and the Comprehensive Plan address all of the elements required in the Local Land Use Planning Act of Idaho. This plan applies to all geographic areas within Meridian’s jurisdiction, including its surrounding Area of City Impact. Plan goals, objectives, and action items are designed to address a 10- to 15-year period, although some of the elements and action items address a longer timeframe. Nature of the Plan The Meridian Comprehensive Plan is an official policy guide for decisions concerning the physical development of the community. The Plan establishes goals, objectives and action items to implement the City’s policies regarding growth. The Plan works in concert with City Code and other planning-related documents like the City’s Strategic Plan, the City’s Sewer and Water Master Plans, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and Capital Improvement Plans. It is also used in “...integrate the con- cerns and expressions of the community into a document that guides the City on how to grow and de- velop.” City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 1 3 Chapter conjunction with each City department’s strategic plan and action plan. The Plan is not a set of standards or a means to enforce City Code. Instead, it indicates, in a general way, how the community should develop. Citizens, developers, the Planning and Zoning Commission, as well as the City Council and other groups, are all involved in shaping community development and have a primary responsibility to coordinate and direct the overall pattern of development activities within the community. The City Council, with recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, make development decisions concerning annexation, rezoning, and subdivision developments at public hearings, as well as conditional use permits, variances, and planned unit developments. Due to their responsibilities, it is necessary for the City to implement technical guidelines and adopt policies which will provide the framework for resolving questions relating to appropriateness of proposed physical development and whether they add to the quality of life to Meridian citizens and are in the best interest of the City. The City also needs to establish long-range implementation items for coordinated, unified development of public improvement projects. Plan History and Preparation Meridian’s first Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1978. That first plan was developed to meet the requirements of the newly enacted1975 Land Use Planning Act of the State of Idaho, Title 67, Chapter 65. During the summer of 1993, citizens representing neighborhood groups, developers, real estate professionals, and public agencies participated in a Comprehensive Plan update process; a modernized City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan was adopted on December 21, 1993. In August 1998, the Meridian City Council adopted the Meridian Vision Statement. By June 1999, the process of developing Meridian’s 2002 Comprehensive Plan had begun, with eventual adoption by the City Council on August 6, 2002. A significant amount of time has elapsed and growth occurred, since the 2002 version of the Comprehensive Plan. To ensure that the document remains relevant and to make it more useable, today’s City leaders recognize that a significant overhaul is needed. Many goals, objectives, and actions outlined in the 2002 plan remain. However, some changes to the plan are in order as some of the items have already been performed, objectives met, or are no longer desired. Additionally, new initiatives like sustainability and a City Arts Commission have commenced since 2002 and need to be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Throughout the comprehensive planning process, citizens affirmed that the goals, objectives, and action items contained in this plan are based on seven key community values: 1. Manage growth to achieve high-quality development. 2. Enhance Meridian’s quality of life for all current and future residents. 3. New growth should finance public service expansion. 4. Prevent school overcrowding and enhance education services. “A man who does not think and plan long ahead will find trouble right at his door.” -Confucius” Chapter 4 1 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5. Expand commercial and industrial development. 6. Improve transportation. 7. Protect Meridian’s self-identity. These important community values were expressed originally in the 1993 Comprehensive Plan and again reaffirmed during the 2002 planning process. These values continue to drive the policies contained in this 2010 update to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. City staff used survey information, workshops, steering committees, town hall meetings, and social media sites as public involvement tools to help steer the 2010 update to the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Community input solicited throughout the planning process helps ensure community support for the updated goals, objectives and action items that are created or updated as part of that involvement. For the 2010 version of the Comprehensive Plan, appropriate carry-over goals, objectives and action items were included from the 1993 and 2002 versions of the Plan, and new policy statements were composed from various stakeholders, sub-committees and general public input. The goal is to make the Comprehensive Plan a better resource that the general public, developers and decision makers can all help implement making Meridian a premier place to live, work and raise a family. Plan Vision The Plan establishes a future vision and course of action based on the issues and concerns of the community. The vision adopted by the leaders of our premier city is to promote a safe and vibrant community by implementing the principles and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Mayor and Council provide effective and responsible leadership, positive staff development, maximize available resources, and improve connectivity to our community. As a caring City we are committed to fiscal responsibility, public involvement, strategic partnerships and economic vitality. To that end, the City has established five City-wide strategic focus areas where City departments work together to guide growth, create jobs and a sustainable economic base, provide services, and be good stewards of the public trust, with trained staff that are committed to the City’s core values. Plan Structure The Comprehensive Plan is structured around the community’s vision as well as the City’s Focus Areas and Initiatives. A brief explanation about each topic then follows, explaining the underlying need addressing each element. At the end of each chapter is a list of the goals, objectives and action items best represented in the chapter. Included in the table listing the goals, objectives and specific action items is a column that assigns a responsible lead (e.g. City department) to each action item (element). Finally, Glossary Terms, Acronyms and Abbreviations, a Regulatory Takings Checklist, and the Future Land Use Map are included as appendices to this Plan. ““Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap but by the seeds that you plant.” - Robert Louis Stevenson City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 1 5 Chapter Using this Document There are several groups of people that will use this document in different ways: citizens, applicants for development, and City staff, Commissioners and elected officials. Citizens are encouraged to use this document to better understand the City’s vision for their neighborhood, their business, and the City as a whole. The Plan is formatted so goals, objectives, and action items that may be of interest are easy to find. Applicants for development can also use this document to better understand the City’s vision. The intent is to provide clear expectations on the obligations and permissions generally described within the Comprehensive Plan; our hope is to provide a greater certainty in creating a successful project that matches the City’s vision, addresses the concerns of neighboring properties, and provides the flexibility to accomplish a developer’s vision as well. Finally, this document will be frequently used by City staff, City commissions and task forces, and elected officials. It will not only be used by the Planning Department in reviewing development applications, but also by other departments in crafting their annual strategic plans and in developing and implementing their capital improvement and master plans. Implementation of the Plan will take hard work and dedication from the entire community. Hopefully, everyone finds the organization of this document to be user friendly and the goals, objectives and action items representative of the community’s vision. REFERENCE LINKS City of Meridian »http://www.meridiancity.org Existing Conditions Report »http://www.meridiancity.org/compplan/ Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan »http://www.meridiancity.org/tmisap/ Unified Development Code (UDC) »http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index. php?book_id=306 City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual »http://www.meridiancity.org/design/ Meridian Pathways Master Plan »http://www.meridiancity.org/parks_rec.aspx?id=2667 Meridian Development Corp (MDC) »http://www.meridiandevelopmentcorp.com/ Destination Downtown »http://www.meridiandevelopmentcorp.com/vision-plan Ada County Highway District (ACHD) »http://www.achdidaho.org/ Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) »http://itd.idaho.gov/ COMPASS »http://www.compassidaho.org/ Valley Regional Transit (VRT) »http://www.valleyregionaltransit.org/ Sites listed without a www.meridiancity.org domain are not maintained or operated by the City. Meridian’s online City code is maintained by Sterling Codifiers. 6 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 2 7 Chapter Chapter 2 – Community Character Meridian, has transformed from a sagebrush-filled mail drop located on the Oregon Trail in the 1880s, into one of the fastest growing cities in the state of Idaho and the western United States. Its charming history tells the story of a small town tied to its agricultural roots, while its future will depend on growing industry, spurring small business development and thriving neighborhoods. Community Design The City continues to upgrade community design standards for landscaping, site design and signs through the adoption of updated ordinance criteria that ensure development occurs in a compatible, attractive manner. The City adopted a Design Manual1 by Resolution Number 09-647 on January 27th, 2009 as an addendum to the City’s Comprehensive Plan. On February 16th, 2016, the City replaced the Design Manual with an Architectural Standards Manual (ASM). The ASM includes standards that are part of the citywide design review process that encourages the aesthetic development of the physical and built environment and results in an attractive, livable community. For their parts in the design review process, the ASM focuses on building design and the Unified Development Code on site design. Community design goals and objectives focus on protecting and improving the unique elements of the natural and built environment that contribute value Meridian’s quality of place. The inherent goal of community design is to improve on the livability and quality of life for not only current, but also future generations of Meridian residents. For the purpose of this document, community design includes analysis primarily on design review. However, community design ties back in with sustainability, livability, healthy initiatives, as well as other elements of this plan. Quality of Life and Livability Quality of life can be used to express the overall well- being of individuals within a community. Elements such as health, safety, land use, transportation, sewer and water service, parks and recreation, housing are all 1 Go to http://www.meridiancity.org/planning.aspx?id=230 GUIDE TO COMMUNITY CHARACTER The following material helps to identify key design characteristics and benefits of different development densities. For additional information, see the City of Meridian Design Manual. Keys to Rural Character »Wide-open landscapes with no sense of enclosure, and views to the horizon mostly unbroken by buildings »Structures are in the background or invisible entirely as they blend into the landscape »Very high open-space ratios and very low building cov- erage »Great building separation, providing privacy and detach- ment from neighboring dwellings Keys to Sub-Urban Character »More horizontal development than the rural class with broader spacing than the urban class »Space enclosure, if any, is provided by trees and vegeta- tion rather than buildings »Large building setbacks from streets with more “green” and open space versus on-lot driveways and on-lot park- ing surfaces »More building setbacks from streets with more “green” and open space versus on-lot driveways and on-lot park- ing surfaces »More building separation, through larger setbacks and, in some cases, larger lot »Much lower lot coverage and a correspondingly higher open spaces ration on lots »More extensive vegetation and landscaping Keys to Urban Character »Streets and other public spaces are framed by buildings »Housing types range from small, narrower single-family lots dominated by driveways and front-loaded garages (auto-urban) to attached residential (e.g., brownstones, town houses) and multi-family dwellings with alley access or rear garages (urban). Yard and landscaped areas are reduced »Smaller front and side setbacks with a tighter building spacing »Most conductive for pedestrian activity and interaction »Higher densities allow for additional amenities otherwise not cost effective in lower densities Schwab, Jim, (2010, Dec). Defining and Measuring Community Character. ZoningPractice, Vol.27, No.12, 6-7 Chapter 8 2 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan critical to daily life and are typically addressed in a comprehensive plan. Other elements like education opportunities, arts and entertainment opportunities, a sound job market, and sustainability are also factors which can help gauge whether a community is creating a thriving environment for its citizens. This Plan addresses all of these elements (and more). Some of the elements addressed in this Plan are more difficult than others to describe and measure. At its heart though, everything set in this document seeks to improve the health, safety, well-being, and quality of life for existing and future residents of Meridian. Quality of life generally represents the social well-being of individuals in a community. Livability is another term used to express the overall relationship between community members and the satisfaction residents derive from their surroundings. These livability and quality of life factors can be both public service related and derived from the quality of the built environment, the quality of place. Generally, elements such as security, environmental beautification, public cleanliness, social and cultural opportunities, travel, career opportunities, and natural resources contribute to the overall livability of an area. Livability is largely affected by conditions in the public realm, and elements share interconnected relationships where they hold more value than their sum total, as an increased or declining value in one element can have dramatic impacts on the actual and perceived values of others. Benchmarks for measuring livability and quality of life are difficult to describe. Often places that are livable have the “it” factor. They are neighborhoods where everyone wants to be at and seen in. One could argue that Meridian’s popularity indicates that many of the livability factors are present in most areas of Meridian; that most Meridian residents perceive their community as a safe, accessible, and attractive place to live. Other anecdotal evidence of success could be 2010 awards from publications such as CNN/Money Magazine, which placed Meridian at 62 in their “100 Best Places to Live”, or Family Circle Magazine which included Meridian in their “Ten Best Towns for Families” list. That being stated, there is still room to grow towards making Meridian even more livable. Below are excellent examples of programs intent on improving overall quality of life in Meridian. Streets, Pathways and Sidewalks: A healthy community is one that has good connectivity between residential areas and community gathering places as well as streets that serve multiple users. • Safe Routes to School: The Meridian School District is currently working on a master Safe Routes map that designates pedestrian routes to and from schools. The City and the School District annually partner to City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 2 9 Chapter compile a list of high priority pedestrian projects for ACHD’s Community Programs. As part of the development review process, the City regularly requires developers to install sidewalk, micro-pathways and multi-use pathways that connect to school sites. • Complete Streets: The City and transportation agencies in the region are committed to ensuring that streets, bridges and transit stops are designed, constructed, operated and maintained so that pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists and people of all ages and abilities can travel safely and independently. The City strives to balance the needs of all users while creating attractive corridors. • Mobility Management: COMPASS has developed a Mobility Management Implementation Guidebook which highlights design guidelines for creating communities that promote a multi-modal transportation approach appropriate for seniors, youth, and other non-drivers. City staff uses the Mobility Management Implementation Guidebook when reviewing development. Child Care: Accessible, affordable and quality before- and after-school child care is another necessary component of creating a healthy and livable community. A robust local system of child care and early education programs has social, economic and environmental benefits for children, families and the community as a whole. The American Planning Association (APA) advocates including child care policies within local planning. Creating policies, identifying local resources and working with developers and community partners, the City hopes to have a more proactive and positive influence on the child care programs being provided in the future. Youth Programs: The City recognizes that our youth are approximately one- third of our population but 100% of our future. • Boys & Girls Club: As part of its commitment to its youth, the City encourages, supports, and partners with groups like the Boys & Girls Club. The City works with the Boys & Girls Club by providing monetary assistance to offset the transportation costs associated with getting kids to and from the club. Funding, provided through the City’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allows the club to provide this service to primarily children of low- to moderate income families. • Mayor’s Anti-Drug Coalition: The Meridian Mayor’s Anti-Drug Coalition (MADC) is a grass-roots volunteer organization initiated by the executive order of Mayor Tammy de Weerd in January 2004 in response to her concern about the rising rates of drug use in the Treasure Valley. Educating adults and youth about the harmful and costly direct and indirect effects of drug abuse has been a longstanding goal of the coalition. In addition, the MADC is confronting a complex set of factors that contribute to our youth abusing substances. “To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also dream; not only plan, but also believe.” - Anatole France Chapter 10 2 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan • The Mayor’s Youth Advisory is a group of students dedicated to serving their community. More than a community service organization MYAC instills leadership skills that participants will use their entire life. MYAC members work alongside local and national service organizations on very diverse projects. Participants are in grades 9 – 12 and attend one of Meridian’s high schools or are home-schooled. Senior Programs: Providing accessible and suitable housing options that are easily accessible to community destinations are key to allowing older adults to remain independent, active and engaged with the community. Housing for seniors that is integrated into the fabric of the community is becoming increasing important as the Baby Boom Generation enters retirement. Keeping our seniors active with easy access to a variety if groups, clubs, and activities is vital to retaining the wealth of wisdom, knowledge, and guidance they can provide our community. Healthy Initiatives For the purposes of defining health and implementing healthy initiatives, the City looks to the Partnership for Sustainable Communities, an interagency agreement between Housing and Urban Development (HUD), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to help define what a healthy community looks like. These initiatives are a combination of the social services and the physical built aspects of the community. The six principles for a healthy community include: • Provide more transportation choices: Develop safe, reliable and economical transportation choices to decrease household transportation costs, reduce dependence on foreign oil, improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote public health. • Promote equitable, affordable housing: Expand location- and energy- efficient housing choices for people of all ages, incomes, races and ethnicities to increase mobility and lower the combined cost of housing and transportation. • Enhance economic competitiveness: Improve economic competitiveness through reliable and timely access to employment centers, educational opportunities, services and other basic needs by workers as well as expanded business access to markets. • Support existing communities: Target federal funding toward existing communities through such strategies as transit-oriented, mixed-use development and land recycling to increase community revitalization, improve the efficiency of public works investments, and safeguard rural landscapes. “Keeping our seniors active with easy ac- cess to a variety if groups, clubs, and activities is vital to re- taining the wealth of wisdom, knowledge, and guidance they can provide our com- munity.” City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 2 11 Chapter • Coordinate policies and leverage investment: Align federal policies and funding to remove barriers to collaboration, leverage funding and increase the accountability and effectiveness of all levels of government to plan for future growth, including making smart energy choices such as locally generated renewable energy. • Value communities and neighborhoods: Enhance the unique characteristics of all communities by investing in healthy, safe and walkable neighborhoods – rural, urban or suburban. Many of these principles align with values Meridian residents have expressed as important, and goals the City seeks to improve to make Meridian more livable, healthy and improve overall quality of life. 12 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ 13City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 2Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 2.01.00 Sustain, enhance, promote and protect elements that contribute to the livability and a high quality of life for all Meridian residents. 2.01.01 Encourage health and well-being of community. 2.01.01A Provide a walkable community through good design.On-going Community Development 2.01.01B Provide opportunities for physical activities.On-going Parks 2.01.01C Plan for and encourage services like health care, daycare, grocery stores and recreational areas to be built within walking distance of residential dwellings. On-going Community Development 2.01.01D Encourage community support and volunteer work.On-going Mayor's Office 2.01.01E Help educate and curtail the rate of obesity, drug, alcohol, tobacco and other substance use.Highest Police 2.01.01F Work with Health and Welfare, Central District Health, and community partners to develop healthy initiatives. High Parks / Fire 2.01.01G Develop programs, in partnership with allied agency responders, which focus on preventative emergency medical services risk reduction.High Fire 2.01.02 Support beautiful development. 2.01.02A Implement community design ordinances, and complete streets policies.On-going Community Development 2.01.02B Implement design criteria to set quality standards City-wide.On-going Community Development 2.01.02C Coordinate with appropriate agencies on interstate and gateway beautification (landscaping, signage).On-going Community Development 2.01.02D Use the Comprehensive Plan, the Unified Development Code, and the Architectural Standards Manual to discourage strip development, and encourage clustered, landscaped business or residential development on entryway corridors.On-going Community Development 2.01.02E Require landscape street buffers for new development along all entryway corridors. On-going Community Development 2.01.02F When possible, and financially feasible, underground utility lines.On-going Public Works 2.01.03 Strengthen community pride and identity. Chapter 2 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items 14City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 2Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 2.01.03A Control the spread of noxious weeds by administering an efficient, quick-response weed removal ordinance with progressive notices and penalties, in conjunction with Ada County Weed Control and Code Enforcement.On-going Police 2.01.03B Require all commercial and industrial businesses to install and maintain landscaping. On-going Community Development 2.01.03C Continue supporting community-betterment activities such as "Old Town Community Cleanup" and "Rake Up Meridian."On-going Police 2.01.03D Support and encourage involvement of community youth in the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council (MYAC) and other youth activities, groups and volunteer opportunities.On-going Mayor's Office 2.01.03E Work with residents to use homeowners associations to help maintain common areas and landscaping along public rights of way and other areas visible from public streets. On-going Police 2.01.03F Implement the Welcome to Meridian signage plan. On-going Community Development 2.01.03G Require new development to construct and maintain monument signs, consistent with the Welcome to Meridian signage plan. On-going Community Development 2.01.03H Budget for the construction of Welcome signs throughout the City. Medium Community Development 2.01.03I Promote the entryway corridors into Meridian from the I-84 interchanges and from the North, South, East, and West of City limits that will clearly identify the community.On-going Community Development 2.01.03J Provide landscaping, pedestrian friendly areas, and appropriate signage at gateways, and new development sites throughout town as appropriate, with upscale attractive construction.On-going Community Development 2.01.04 Realize strong, viable and recognizable identities for all neighborhoods.  2.01.04A Ensure long-term maintenance of greenbelts along waterways either directly by the City Parks and Recreation Department or through partnerships with neighboring associations, homeowners associations, and other community groups.On-going Parks 2.01.04B Require all new and reconstructed parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands and along streets, and to positively influence the physical and visual environment through screening, paving materials, and other landscape techniques.On-going Community Development 2.01.04C Continue to support the Meridian senior citizens' organization as an important social program in the community.On-going Mayor's Office / City Council 2.01.04D Support acquisition and development of new park land to meet the growing open space and recreational needs of the community.On-going Parks 15City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 2Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 2.01.04E [Removed]NA NA 2.01.04F Continue property maintenance programs through code enforcement to remove junk vehicles, weed nuisances, and trash, etc.On-going Police 2.01.04G Promote area beautification and community identity through building and site design, signs, and landscaping.On-going Community Development 2.01.04H Enhance and preserve aesthetic resources.On-going Community Development 2.01.04I Encourage new development to enhance the visual quality of its surroundings.On-going Community Development 2.02.00 Encourage the development of a continuum of services to meet the health care needs of the citizens of Meridian. 2.02.01 Ensure that high-quality emergency care, primary, outpatient, home, and long-term care and other types of health care are provided in the community. 2.02.01A Identify and encourage medical service related industry which are currently lacking.Highest Economic Development 2.02.01B Promote medical service related industries.Medium Economic Development 16City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 2Chapter ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 17 Chapter Chapter 3 – Strategic Growth Since 1990, Meridian experienced exponential growth that has changed both its character and appearance. From 1990 to 2007, Meridian’s population grew from approximately 10,000 to over 65,000. Despite some recent slowdowns in housing starts and job creation, the population of Meridian continues to increase with an estimated population of 75,290 in 2009 according to the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS). A population growth forecast performed by COMPASS, and analyzed in the Existing Condition Report, forecasts that the population of Meridian will increase to 138,564 by 2035, an increase of over 70% from the 2009 estimated population. Over the last 20 years, property in and around Meridian has changed from primarily agricultural to a more diverse mix of residential, commercial, and industrial uses. That trend is likely to continue as land traditionally used for agriculture, continues to be developed to support the needs of an ever-growing community. Today, the City of Meridian has over 17,000 acres within its municipal boundaries and—at full build out—is anticipated to incorporate approximately 39,000 acres within its Area of City Impact. Chapter 18 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Area of City Impact In accord with § 67-6526 of Idaho Code, an Area of City Impact (AOCI) has been established for Meridian. The City’s AOCI is the future planning area for the City, where annexation and development within the future municipal boundary of Meridian is anticipated. Although these areas are not yet incorporated, planning responsibilities for these lands rest with the City of Meridian while zoning and land use authority is maintained by Ada County. There is an agreement between Ada County and Meridian for the Area of City Impact. This agreement states that the current Meridian Comprehensive Plan will apply within the City’s established AOCI. Within the AOCI, the county has generally applied a Rural Urban Transition (RUT) zone which permits five-acre- lot, single-family residential development, as well as agricultural-related uses and a range of conditional uses. County development applications within the Area of City Impact are reviewed by the City of Meridian for compliance with the comprehensive plan and applicable City policies. The City of Meridian desires all development within its Area of City Impact to be served with urban services from the City of Meridian. Such services primarily include sanitary sewer, water, reclaimed water, fire, police, and parks. Secondarily, the City will consider the availability and capacity of the school system, transportation facilities, libraries, and storm water facilities in any review of development within the Area of City Impact. All requests for annexation into the City limits will require that the owner extend City-owned services at the time of development. However, the City recognizes that some development may precede the ability of the City, on its own, to extend services for such development. Upon formal requests to the City for development that is on property not immediately serviceable with urban services, the City Council may consider said applications TAble 3-1. COMMuNiTY CHOiCeS FOreCASTS Jurisdiction/ Demographic Area 2009 Estimate 2035 Forecast % Change, 2008 - 2035 Population HH Population HH Population HH Meridian 75,290 27,282 138,564 46,697 71.62%71.16% boise 215,630 99,748 346,704 135,180 35.71%35.52% eagle 21,370 7,347 29,917 10,066 37.42%37.01% Kuna 15,900 5,183 43,162 13,590 166.88%162.20% Nampa 82,830 32,156 132,040 45,484 41.72%41.45% Ada County 408,190 150,968 685,628 251,138 69.02%66.35% Canyon County 190,920 66,057 361,021 124,402 87.44%88.33% regional Total 599,110 217,025 1,046,649 375,540 74.95%73.04% Source: COMPASS, 2000-2009 Population estimates by City limit boundaries. City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 19 Chapter at a noticed meeting to determine if the proposed level of development is appropriate and in the best interests of the City. The City recognizes that some development may precede our ability to annex the property. Developments within the AOCI but outside City limits will only be considered if the following standards and conditions are agreed to by the developer(s): • The development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development. • An irrevocable consent to annexation is a condition of hook-up to City sanitary sewer or water, is made a deed restriction on all buildable lots, and is placed as a note on all final plats. • All City sewer and water inspection and plan review fees (for the main lines) in effect at the time of development are paid to the City of Meridian. • Development is consistent with the Future Land Use Map designation for the property. The City of Meridian is committed to fulfilling the terms of its Area of City Impact Agreement with Ada County as well as similar agreements with neighboring cities including Eagle, Kuna, Star, and Boise. We also note the City’s intent to continue working with the County and surrounding cities on Area of City Impact boundaries and development policies. TAble 3-2. FuTure lAND uSeS WiTHiN THe CiTY OF MeriDiAN AreA OF CiTY iMPACT Future Land Uses FLUM Total FLUM Undeveloped Acres %Acres % residential 23,618.27 60.15 13,044.07 58.75 Commercial 1,495.99 3.81 134.60 0.61 Office 417.34 1.06 68.74 0.31 industrial 597.31 1.52 10.61 0.05 Old Town 336.42 0.86 0.12 0.00 Mixed use 4,165.87 10.61 2,027.91 9.13 Civic 1,395.34 3.55 390.29 1.76 Ten Mile Interchange Specific 2,374.50 6.05 1,676.57 7.55 Future Planning/referral 4,863.85 12.39 4,851.27 21.85 TOTAl 39,264.88 100 22,204.18 100 Source: City of Meridian Planning Department, 2010. Chapter 20 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan The Future Land Use Map Land Use is a key component of the Comprehensive Plan, as is mapping future land uses so that development occurs in the direction and manner most desired by Meridian’s citizens and elected officials. The Future Land Use Map (FLUM), see Appendix D, identifies the vision for a mix of land uses to implement the City’s many diverse goals and objectives, and works in conjunction with the text of the Comprehensive Plan, City code and the various policies of the City. However, the FLUM is not a zoning map and differs in that the FLUM describes the character and type of use that is desired in the future and not necessarily what is currently in place. The FLUM also depicts schools, parks, fire stations and other existing civic uses. The FLUM depicts a built-out Meridian that is very diverse in residential densities, commercial and industrial land uses as well as civic/public opportunities. Land use recommendations as set forth in this plan emphasize the importance of thoughtful and responsible land use planning, cooperation and collaboration among the various jurisdictions and agencies in the area, and preservation and enhancements of the high quality of life that currently exists in Meridian. The next several pages that follow include descriptions of the various future land use designations that appear on the FLUM. Residential The purpose of this designation is to provide a variety of housing types. Uses will include a range of densities varying from large estate lots to multi-family homes. Residential designations are as follows: • Rural / Estate: to allow for agricultural uses and the ancillary development of single-family homes on large parcels where city services (e.g. – sewer and water) may or may not be provided. Uses may include both small and larger-scale agricultural related activities and single-family homes at densities less than or equal to one unit per five acres. New development should recognize existing agricultural uses and practices, respect view sheds and open space, and maintain or improve the overall health and production of agricultural lands and resources in the area. • Low Density: to allow for the development of single-family homes on large lots where urban services are provided. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of three dwelling units or less per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of public amenities such as open space, pathways, or land dedicated for public services. • Medium Density: to allow smaller lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of public amenities such as open space, pathways, or land dedicated for public services. • Medium High Density: to allow for the development of a mix of relatively dense residential housing types including townhouses, condominiums and “Greatness, it turns out, is largely a matter of conscious choice.” -Jim Collins City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 21 Chapter apartments. Residential gross densities should range from eight to fifteen dwelling units per acre, with a target density of twelve units per acre. These are relatively compact areas within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and individual project identity. • High Density: to allow for the development of multi-family homes in areas where urban services are provided. Residential gross densities should exceed fifteen dwelling units per acre. Development might include duplexes, apartment buildings, townhouses, and other multi-unit structures. A desirable project would consider the placement of parking areas, fences, berms, and other landscaping features to serve as buffers between neighboring uses. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design that incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and individual project identity. Within residential areas the following policies shall apply: • At the discretion of City Council, areas with a Residential Comprehensive Plan designation may request an office use if the property only has frontage on an arterial street or section line road and is three acres or less in size. In this instance, no ancillary commercial uses shall be permitted. • In residential areas, other residential densities will be considered without requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. However, the density can only be changed one “step” (i.e., from low to medium, not low to high, etc.). This provision does not apply to 1) the area bounded by Can- Ada, Chinden, McDermott, and Ustick Roads or 2) within the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan. • Residential uses north of Chinden Boulevard and within ¼ mile or less from the rim should have lot sizes ranging from one-half to one acre, ensuring compatibility with SpurWing Country Club to the east. Use of transitional lot sizes and clustering of smaller lots adjacent to the non- residential and rim property are encouraged. Commercial This designation will provide a full range of commercial and retail to serve area residents and visitors. Uses may include retail, wholesale, service and office uses, multi-family residential, as well as appropriate public uses such as government offices. Within this land use category, specific zones may be created to focus commercial activities unique to their locations. These zones may include “What is a city, but the people; true the people are the city.” -Coriolanus III Chapter 22 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan neighborhood commercial uses focusing on specialized service for residential areas adjacent to that zone. Office This designation will provide opportunities for low-impact business areas. These would include offices, technology and resource centers; ancillary commercial uses may be considered (particularly within research and development centers or technological parks). Industrial This designation allows a range of industrial uses to support industrial and commercial activities and to develop areas with sufficient urban services. Light industrial uses may include warehouses, storage units, light manufacturing, and incidental retail and offices uses. Heavy industrial uses may include processing, manufacturing, warehouses, storage units, and industrial support activities. In all cases, screening, landscaping, and adequate access should be provided. Old Town This designation includes the historic downtown and the true community center. The boundary of the Old Town district predominantly follows Meridian’s historic plat boundaries. In several areas, both sides of a street were incorporated into the boundary to encourage similar uses and complimentary design of the facing houses and buildings. Sample uses include offices, retail and lodging, theatres, restaurants, and service retail for surrounding residents and visitors. A variety of residential uses are also envisioned and could include reuse of existing buildings, new construction of multi-family residential over ground floor retail or office uses. The City has developed specific architectural standards for Old Town and other traditional neighborhood areas. Pedestrian amenities are emphasized in Old Town via streetscape standards. Public investment that ensures that Old Town becomes a centralized activity center, with public, cultural, and recreational structures are encouraged, and the City’s decision to build City Hall in Old Town is testament to its commitment to the area. Future planning in Old Town will be reviewed in accordance with Destination Downtown, a visioning document for redevelopment in downtown Meridian. Please see the Economic Excellence chapter for more information on Destination Downtown. Mixed Use Designations In general, the purpose of this designation is to provide for a combination of compatible land uses within a close geographic area that allows for easily accessible services for residents and the workers. The uses can be mixed vertically, such as a building with retail on the ground floor and offices above, or horizontally, such as a healthcare center with a mix of doctor offices, pharmacy, beauty salon, assisted care facilities, and apartments. Mixed use areas tend to have higher floor area ratios (less area devoted to parking), open space, and interconnected vehicular and pedestrian networks. A Mixed Use designation is typically used “It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.” -Eleanor Roosevelt City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 23 Chapter to identify a key area within the City which is either infill in nature or situated in a highly visible or transitioning area where innovative and flexible designs are encouraged. The intent of this designation is to promote developments that offer functional and physical integration of land uses while allowing developers a greater degree of design and use flexibility. Mixed Use areas are typically developed under a master or conceptual plan; during an annexation or rezone request, a development agreement will typically be required for developments with a Mixed Use designation. There are five sub-categories of the Mixed Use designation that are used throughout the City: Neighborhood, Community, Regional, Interchange, and Non- Residential. This section further describes the purpose, intent and development standards for these sub-categories. In addition, there are three sub-categories of the Mixed Use designation that are solely used in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area: Commercial, Residential and Lifestyle Center. The land use designations within the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area are shown on the city-wide Future Land Use Map. However, the Mixed Use designations in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area are different than those throughout the rest of the City and as described in this document. Mixed Use land use designations in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area are not subject to this section. For detailed descriptions of the land use designations in the Ten Mile area, go directly to the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan2. For the purposes of the Mixed Use section, the City identifies five different land use types: 1) commercial [includes retail, restaurants, etc.]; 2) office; 3) residential; 4) civic [includes public open space, parks, entertainment venues, etc.]; and, 5) industrial. All development in Mixed Use areas fall within one of these five categories. Industrial uses are typically discouraged in residential mixed use areas. However, if the developer can demonstrate that industrial uses are compatible and appropriate in Mixed Use – Regional (MU-R), Mixed Use Non Residential (MU- NR) and Mixed Use Interchange (MU-I) areas, the City will consider industrial uses, when proposed as part of a Mixed Use development. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas: • Residential densities should be a minimum of six dwellings/acre. • Where feasible, higher density and/or multi-family residential development will be encouraged, especially for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69. • A conceptual site plan for the entire mixed use area should be included in the application. • In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed (not residential), the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space. 2 Go to http://www.meridiancity.org/TMISAP/ “Setting a goal is not the main thing. It is deciding how you will go about achieving it and staying with that plan.” -Tom Landry Chapter 24 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan • The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low- or medium-density residential development. • A mixed use project should include at least three types of land uses. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis. • Community-serving facilities such as hospitals, churches, schools, parks, daycares, civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed use developments. • Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count. • All mixed use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians. • Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required within the Unified Development Code. • Because of the existing small lots within Old Town, development is not subject to the Mixed Use standards listed herein. Mixed Use Neighborhood (MU-N). The purpose of this designation is to assign areas where neighborhood-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to avoid predominantly single-use developments by incorporating a variety of uses. Land uses in these areas should be primarily residential with supporting non-residential services. Non-residential uses in these areas tend to be smaller scale and provide a good or service that people typically do not travel far for (approximately one mile) and need regularly. Employment opportunities for those living in the neighborhood are encouraged. Connectivity and access between the non-residential and residential land uses is particularly critical in MU-N areas. Tree-lined, narrow streets are encouraged. Developments are also encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-N plan depicted in Figure 3-1. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in MU-N areas: • Development should comply with the items listed for development in all Mixed Use areas. • Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 40% of the development area at densities ranging from six to 12 units/acre. • Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with residential buildings. “Planning is bringing the future into the present so that you can do something about it now” - Alan Lakein City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 25 Chapter • Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, maximum building size should be limited to a 20,000 square-foot building footprint. For the development of public school sites, the maximum building size does not apply. • Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places such as parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools should comprise a minimum of 10% of the development area. Outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count towards this requirement. • Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 10%, the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint. Sample uses appropriate in MU-N areas would include: townhouses, multi-family developments, neighborhood grocer, drug stores, coffee/sandwich/ice-cream shops, vertically integrated buildings, live-work spaces, dry cleaner/laundromat, salons/spas, daycares, neighborhood-scale professional offices, medical/dental clinics, gift shops, schools, parks, churches, clubhouses, public uses, and other appropriate neighborhood-scale uses. Appropriate zoning districts include: TN-R, TN-C, L-O, C-N and R-15. In certain MU-N areas there is a Neighborhood Center (N.C.) overlay designation. In these areas the City seeks to create a centralized, pedestrian-oriented, identifiable and day-to-day, service-oriented focal point for neighborhood scale development. Like other designations, the N.C. areas shown on the Future Land Use Map are conceptual only and intended to identify a maximum walking distance from the core of the neighborhood center of 1/4 mile. Neighborhood Centers Figure 3-1. MiXeD uSe NeigHbOrHOOD CONCePT DiAgrAM Chapter 26 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan that straddle or are centered on one or more principal or minor arterials should adhere to a similar design and recognize access control measures as established by the Ada County Highway District and City Code. Neighborhood Centers should serve as public transit locations for future park-and-ride lots, bus stops, shuttle bus stops and/or other alternative modes of transportation. Neighborhood Center developments are encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual neighborhood center plan depicted in Figure 3-2. The grid street pattern within the neighborhood allows traffic to disperse, eases congestion, slows traffic, and is safer for residents. In addition to the items listed for the MU-N designation, the following items will be considered in all MU-N areas with an N.C. overlay: • Four specific design elements should be incorporated into a Neighborhood Center development: a) street connectivity, b) open space, c) pathways, and d) residential density that is eight dwelling units per acre or more. • Most blocks should be no more than 500’ to 600’, similar to Old Town or Heritage Commons; larger blocks are allowed along arterial streets. • Reduced travel lane widths are encouraged. • The design should provide an interconnected circulation pattern that is convenient for automobiles, pedestrians, and transit. • The centers should offer an internal circulation system that connects with adjacent neighborhoods and regional pathways, connecting to and integrated with the larger street and pathway system. • Developments should provide neighborhood accessible commercial services that do not force residents onto arterial streets. Figure 3-2. MiXeD uSe NeigHbOrHOOD CeNTer CONCePT DiAgrAM City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 27 Chapter • Developments should provide a variety of housing choices and types. • Housing within developments should be arranged in a radiating pattern of lessening densities from the core. • Alleys and roadways should be used to transition from dissimilar land uses, and between residential densities and housing types. Mixed Use Community (MU-C). The purpose of this designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses, including residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings. Non-residential buildings in these areas have a tendency to be larger than in Mixed Use— Neighborhood areas, but not as large as in Mixed Use – Regional areas. Goods and services in these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to, but also walk or bike to (up to three or four miles). Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are encouraged. Developments are encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-C plan depicted in Figure 3-3. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in MU-C areas: • Development should comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed Use areas. • All developments should have a mix of at least three land use types. Figure 3-3. MiXeD uSe COMMuNiTY CONCePT DiAgrAM Chapter 28 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan • Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20% of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre. • Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings. • Vertically integrated structures are encouraged. • Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, maximum building size should be limited to a 30,000 square-foot building footprint. For community grocery stores, the maximum building size should be limited to a 60,000 square- foot building footprint. For the development of public school sites, the maximum building size does not apply. • Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools that comprise a minimum of 5% of the development area are required. Outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count towards this requirement. • Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 5%, the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint. Sample uses appropriate in MU-C areas would include: All MU-N categories, community grocer, clothing stores, garden centers, hardware stores, restaurants, banks, drive-thru facilities, auto service station, and retail shops, and other appropriate community-serving uses. Appropriate zoning districts in the MU-C include: TN-R, TN-C, C-C, L-O, R-15 and R-40. In certain MU-C areas there is a Neighborhood Center (N.C.) overlay designated. In these areas the City seeks a centralized, pedestrian-oriented, identifiable and day-to-day, service-oriented focal point for neighborhood scale development. Like other designations, the N.C. areas shown on the Future Land Use Map are conceptual only and intended to identify a maximum walking distance from the core of the neighborhood center of 1/4 mile. Neighborhood Centers that straddle or are centered on one or more principal or minor arterials should adhere to a similar design and recognize access control measures as established by the Ada County Highway District and City Code. Neighborhood Centers should serve as public transit locations for future park-and-ride lots, bus stops, shuttle bus stops or other alternative modes of transportation. Neighborhood Center developments are encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual neighborhood center plan depicted in Figure 3-4. The grid street pattern within the neighborhood allows traffic to disperse, eases congestion, slows traffic, and is safer for residents. In addition to the items listed for the MU-C designation, the following items will be used in reviewing development applications in all MU-C areas with an N.C. overlay: “Without leaps of imagination, or dreaming, we lose the excitement of pos- sibilities. Dreaming, after all, is a form of planning.” - Gloria Steinem City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 29 Chapter • Four specific design elements should be incorporated into a Neighborhood Center development: a) street connectivity, b) open space, c) pathways, and d) residential density that is eight dwelling units per acre or more. • Most blocks should be no more than 500’ to 600’, similar to Old Town and Heritage Commons; larger blocks are allowed along arterial streets. • Reduced travel lane widths are encouraged. • The design should provide an interconnected circulation pattern that is convenient for automobiles, pedestrians, and transit. • The centers should offer an internal circulation system that connects with adjacent neighborhoods and regional pathways, connecting to and integrated with the larger street and pathway system. • Developments should provide neighborhood accessible commercial services that do not force residents onto arterial streets. • Developments should provide a variety of housing choices and types. • Housing within developments should be arranged in a radiating pattern of lessening densities from the core. • Alleys and roadways should be used to transition from dissimilar land uses, or residential densities. Figure 3-4. MiXeD uSe NeigHbOrHOOD CeNTer CONCePT DiAgrAM Chapter 30 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Mixed Use Regional (MU-R). The purpose of this designation is to provide a mix of employment, retail, and residential dwellings and public uses near major arterial intersections. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses together, including residential, and to avoid predominantly single use developments such as a regional retail center with only restaurants and other commercial uses. Developments should be anchored by uses that have a regional draw with the appropriate supporting uses. For example, an employment center should have support retail uses; a retail center should have supporting residential uses as well as supportive neighborhood and community services. The standards for the MU-R designation provide an incentive for larger public and quasi-public uses where they provide a meaningful and appropriate mix to the development. The developments are encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-R plan depicted in Figure 3-5. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in MU-R areas: • Development should generally comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed Use areas. • Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 10% of the development area at densities ranging from six to 40 units/acre. • Retail commercial uses should comprise a maximum of 50% of the development area. • There is neither a minimum nor maximum imposed on non-retail commercial uses such as office, clean industry, or entertainment uses. Figure 3-5. MiXeD uSe regiONAl CONCePT DiAgrAM City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 31 Chapter Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development, the developer may be eligible for additional area for retail development (beyond the allowed 50%), based on the ratios below: • For land that is designated for a public use, such as a library or school, the developer is eligible for a 2:1 bonus. That is to say, if there is a five- acre library site, the project would be eligible for ten additional acres of retail development. • For active open space or passive recreation areas, such as a park, tot-lot or playfield, the developer is eligible for a 2:1 bonus. That is to say, if the park is 10 acres in area, the site would be eligible for 20 additional acres of retail development. For plazas that are integrated into a retail project, the developer should be eligible for a 6:1 bonus. Such plazas should provide a focal point (such as a fountain, statue, and water feature), seating areas, and some weather protection. That would mean that by providing a half-acre plaza, the developer would be eligible for three additional acres of retail development. Sample uses, appropriate in MU-R areas would include: All MU-N and MU-C categories, entertainment uses, major employment centers, clean industry, and other appropriate regional-serving uses. Appropriate zoning districts include: TN-C, C-G, R-15 and R-40. Mixed Use Non-Residential (MU-NR). The purpose of this designation is to set- aside areas where new residential dwellings will not be permitted, as residential uses are not compatible with the planned and/or existing uses in these areas. For example, MU-NR areas are used near the City’s waste water treatment plant and where there are mining, heavy industrial or other hazardous operations. The City envisions a wide variety of non-residential land uses may occur in MU-NR areas. Employment opportunities, professional offices, warehousing, flex buildings, and storage uses as well as retail uses are envisioned. Developments are encouraged to be designed similar to the conceptual MU-NR plan depicted in Figure 3-6. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in MU-NR areas: • No new residential uses will be permitted (existing residential will be allowed to remain and expand accessory structures). • Development is not required to comply with the items listed for development in all Mixed Use areas. • All developments should have a mix of at least two types of land uses. • Where mixed use developments are phased, a conceptual site plan for the entire mixed use area is encouraged. “All the flowers of all the tomorrows are in the seeds of today” - Indian Proverb Chapter 32 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan • In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed, the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space. • A transitional use is encouraged on the perimeter of the MU-NR areas between any existing or planned residential development. • Community facilities such as a hospital, school, park, daycare, civic building or public safety facilities are encouraged in larger developments. • All retail and service commercial components of projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians. • Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required within the Unified Development Code. • There is neither a minimum nor maximum imposed on non-retail commercial uses such as office, food service/restaurants, industry or warehouse uses. Sample uses, appropriate in MU-NR areas would include: employment centers, professional offices, flex buildings, warehousing, industry, storage facilities and retail, and other appropriate non-residential uses. Appropriate zoning districts include: C-G, C-C, L-O, I-L and I-H. Figure 3-6. MiXeD uSe NON-reSiDeNTiAl CONCePT DiAgrAM City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 33 Chapter Mixed Use Interchange (MU-I). The purpose of this designation is to call-out areas where construction of future SH-16 interchanges is likely to occur, and to acknowledge that this land will have a high degree of visibility. These areas will be served by highway interchange ramps and restricted local access. There are two interchange areas, one located at US 20-26 and one at Ustick Road, that differ from the other Mixed Use categories in that a much stronger emphasis will be placed upon gateway elements and traffic flow/trip generation factors when reviewing new land use applications. Uses in these areas will need to be compatible with the impacts of a freeway interchange. However, these areas are not intended for high volume retail or uses that are better suited in neighborhood centers or commercial areas. The intention is to protect the immediate vicinity of the interchange from traffic conflicts and shift the high traffic-generating uses away from the immediate vicinity of the interchange. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in MU-I areas: • Land uses within the MU-I areas and adjacent to the SH-16 corridor should be carefully examined for their potential impacts on existing and designated neighborhood centers and commercial activity areas. • A traffic impact study may be required for larger developments in these areas. • Vehicular access points should be prohibited near interchange ramps. Future uses should be planned to integrate with a frontage/backage road type circulation system. • Any new development at or near MU-I areas should promote a nodal development pattern where buildings are clustered, off-street parking is screened in the rear of the parcel and, where practical, development is inter-connected with adjoining parcels. • The SH-16/US 20-26 interchange will be one of only two regional gateways to the City of Meridian for travelers coming from north of the Boise River (the other being Linder Road). As such, buildings, landscaping, and other design features at this interchange need to reflect Meridian’s heritage, quality, and character. • Design of the SH-16/US 20-26 interchange and the adjoining land uses must give special consideration to the more scenic and environmentally sensitive area on the north side of US 20-26. The more intensive land uses should be sited on the south side of US 20-26. • Regional ridesharing, park-and-ride and transit transfer facilities are strongly encouraged within the SH-16/US 20-26 MU-I area. • The MU-I area at Ustick Road, west of SH-16, should minimize retail and auto-oriented services and transition rapidly from the interchange to the more rural, low density character intended along the county line. “Plans are only good intentions unless they immediately degener- ate into hard work.” - Peter F. Drucker Chapter 34 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Examples of uses include middle or high schools, post office or library branches, office uses, row house/patio home developments, athletic clubs, etc. The following types of appropriate uses and themes are envisioned at the two interchange locations along SH-16: • US 20-26: Commuter Services, Technology/Research, Business Park • Ustick Road: Educational, Civic, Light Retail, Residential Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area The City developed a specific plan for approximately 2,800 acres bordered (roughly) by Linder Road to the east; McDermott Road to the west: the Union Pacific Railroad line to the north and ½ mile south of Overland Road on the south. The specific area plan is an addendum to this Comprehensive Plan and places an emphasis on a mix of uses, both residential and commercial; new employment areas; higher density residential; a planned collector road network and design guidelines. It is important to note that the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan uses different land use designations than the rest of the FLUM. While there is some similarities in land use designations, for example Low Density Residential, there are also new designations which do not exist outside of this Ten Mile area. The TMISAP was adopted as an addendum to the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan on June 19th, 2007 by Resolutions Numbers 07-563 (Map) and 07-564 (Text). Development in the Ten Mile Interchange area will be reviewed using the TMISAP. See the Economic Development chapter and the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan for more details of this area. Civic The purpose of this designation is to preserve and protect existing and planned municipal, state, and federal lands for area residents and visitors. This category includes public lands, law enforcement facilities, post offices, fire stations, cemeteries, public utility sites (excluding ACHD), public parks, public schools, and other government owned sites within the Area of City Impact. Parks The purpose of this designation is to preserve and protect existing municipal, county, state, and federal land for area residents and visitors and to designate future park locations. These areas include existing and future public neighborhood, community, and urban parks. The park locations designated on the Future Land Use Map are the most current and should be used for planning purposes. These areas are further described in the Services Chapter. “No matter how carefully you plan your goals, they will never be more than pipe dreams unless you pursue them with gusto.” - W. Clement Stone City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 35 Chapter Schools The purpose of this designation is to provide areas throughout the Area of City Impact which provide educational opportunities, community gathering places, and green space. These areas are further described in the Services Chapter. Fire Stations The purpose of this designation is to preserve and protect existing and planned fire station locations throughout the Area of City Impact which provide efficient emergency response. Entryway Corridors The City feels it is important to identify roadways that introduce and welcome both visitors and residents to the City of Meridian. These roadways are noted as entryway corridors on the FLUM and are subject to additional standards within the Unified Development Code. Future Planning and Referral Area This designation is used to preserve areas where additional study and planning needs to occur before future land uses are designated and City services provided. These areas are within Meridian’s Area of City Impact and are subject to the Area of City Impact Agreement with Ada County. Transit Stations and Transit Friendly Development The Transit Station designation is used for areas where transit supported uses are envisioned along the railroad corridor. The City seeks projects that incorporate features which enhance alternative transportation and are transit friendly in these and other locations in the City. Said developments are envisioned within designated neighborhood centers and/or within commercial activity centers and should incorporate the following development and design principles: • A mix of land uses • Building orientation that provides the maximum level of services to pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users • Alternative transit features such as a bus shelter (where approved by Valley Regional Transit), bicycle locker facilities, park and ride lots or similar facilities • Residential densities that are at least 8 dwelling units per acre and designed to comply with the Traditional Neighborhood design standards in the Unified Development Code “Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men’s blood and probably will them- selves not be realized. Make big plans; aim high in hope and work, remembering that a noble, logical diagram once recorded will not die.” - Daniel H. Burnham Chapter 36 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan • Park and ride lots and other transit-supportive facilities are encouraged at interchanges throughout the City. Valley Regional Transit and Ada County Highway District Commuteride should be partners in determining appropriate facilities at each interchange Symbols All “future” symbols shown on the Future Land Use Map, such as parks, schools, fire stations, transit stations, etc., represent generalized locations based on the best information the City has to date. All such symbols are to be considered conceptual and are allowed to “float” on the map. All “existing” symbols shown on the Future Land Use Map for parks, schools, fire stations, etc. represent precise locations based on the facilities in place at the time of printing. Housing “Opportunities for housing should be available for all income groups with a mix of housing including modular, ranchettes, townhouses, apartment housing, low- income housing, and mansions. A vibrant community needs a good cross-section of housing and therefore must guard against an abundance of subdivisions in like density and price range. High-density housing must be strategically located to public transportation, community services, and not negatively affect property values.” This statement was first penned by the Mayor’s Transition Team ad hoc committee on housing in 2002, but it philosophy still holds true. At just under three units per gross acre, Meridian’s population is distributed throughout the community primarily in suburban-style developments comprised of mostly single-family, detached housing units. Going forward, the City does not envision a drastic change in the housing stock. However, the City realizes that the baby boomer generation is aging and there is an increased demand in non single- family detached dwellings from the 55-plus age population group. This coupled with the fact that more young adults are not having children and do not want large homes on large lots, necessitates providing more diversity in housing choices. Transportation The condition of an area’s transportation system impacts that community’s way of life and economic vitality. Realizing this, the City works closely with the transportation and planning agencies in the region to ensure our transportation network is the best it can be. Because Meridian does not have roadway authority of its own, however, the City coordinates with other agencies during the planning and design phases to ensure that projects meet the needs of its citizens. Meridian’s major challenge is to work with the transportation agencies in the region to meet the existing needs for adequate transportation service, while planning for and accommodating future growth as efficiently as possible. With additional growth, lack of funding options, and poor planning may not only lead to worsening traffic problems, but may also have negative impacts on the health and well being of citizens. Increased traffic congestion may deter potential employers from “Good plans shape good decisions. That’s why good planning helps to make elusive dreams come true.” - Lester Robert Bittel City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 37 Chapter locating in Meridian. Therefore, the City works closely with ITD and the State’s Transportation Improvement Plan and COMPASS’ long-range transportation plan Communities in Motion, to make sure our resident’s transportation needs are being met. In addition to planning for future transportation needs, much of the roadway infrastructure already developed will require funding for maintenance, rehabilitation, and expansion. Beyond supporting traditional vehicle use, the City continues to maintain and promote alternative methods of transportation in Meridian as well. From pedestrian sidewalks and regional multi-modal pathways to public transportation efforts, the City recognizes that supporting diversity helps to not only promote a healthier, happier community, but reduces over-use of our roadways by single occupancy vehicles. Examples of public transportation, existing and future potential include; bus routes, paratransit, vanpool, and bus rapid transit systems, not just within Meridian, but the region as a whole. Through cooperation with regional partners, Meridian is planning for the future by supporting and promoting developments that provide transportation options for everyone. Transportation and Land Use Integration To better connect transportation planning and land use decisions, ACHD and the cities in Ada County have compiled the Transportation and Land Use Integration Plan3 (TLIP). This plan envisions livable streets for tomorrow and depicts how streets should look and function in the future. The goal is to create a roadway network that balances the needs of all roadway users-motorists, pedestrians, cyclists, transit and people with disabilities, with streets that complement the built environment. Because a one-size-fits-all program for roadway construction does not respond to either the land use or transportation needs of the community, the City and ACHD have agreed to work more closely together to join together the land use plans of the City with the transportation plans of the ACHD. There are four tools that ACHD and the City use to implement TLIP: the Complete Streets Policy, the Livable Streets Design Guide, a Cost Share Policy, and a Master Street Map. As part of the adoption of this plan, the City hereby incorporates ACHD’s Complete Streets Policy, the Livable Streets Design Guide and the Master Street Map. These documents will all be used by the City when reviewing development applications and plans for new roadway projects. Blueprint for Good Growth TLIP was an outgrowth of Blueprint for Good Growth (BGG), which is aimed at addressing the best methods to manage growth for a sustainable future in Ada County. Through the Blueprint for Good Growth and Communities in Motion (CIM) long-range planning efforts, the public has stated a desire for better design of roadways and increased coordination with adjacent land uses. People have expressed preferences for roads that fit well and complement the built environment. In 2005 the Meridian City Council adopted Resolution Number 05-473 which recognizes that it is critical for the agencies in Ada County to work 3 Go to http://achdidaho.org/deparments/PP/TLIP.aspx “The goal is to create a roadway network that balances the needs of all roadway users-motorists, pedes- trians, cyclists, transit and people with dis- abilities, with streets that complement the built environment” Chapter 38 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan together to develop and create a sensible land use and transportation plan for the area. Communities in Motion (CIM) Communities in Motion (CIM) is the region’s long-range transportation plan. But CIM is more than just a transportation plan. The intent of CIM is to integrate land use and transportation planning. As such, it is intended to provide for an effective multimodal outcome, with land use patterns that support and encourage transportation alternatives. The regional long-range transportation plan for Ada and Canyon Counties, Communities in Motion 2035, was adopted by the COMPASS Board in September 2010. As part of the adoption of this plan, the City hereby adopts the vision of Communities in Motion4. Alternative Transportation The City works with transportation providers in the area to improve access to employment opportunities, medical appointments, recreational activities, and education. But improving transportation is not all about drivers. Local partnerships provide opportunities to create connections for non-drivers like youth, the elderly, and the disabled. Valley Regional Transit (VRT) is the regional public transportation authority for Ada and Canyon counties. VRT is responsible for coordinating transit service and implementing a regional public transportation system. VRT operates the bus service in this area under the name ValleyRide. VRT works in close coordination with ITD, COMPASS and other regional partners to plan for preservation and enhancements to the public transportation system in the two-county area. Pathways that encourage use by bicyclists and pedestrians can decrease road congestion and add to the community’s quality of life. In 2007, Meridian City Council adopted the Meridian Pathways Master Plan. The plan proposes the development of a pathway network that identifies a core system of pathways based on the existing canal system within the City of Meridian. This core system of pathways is enhanced by the developer-implemented pathways that will provide connections to and through many residential areas while creating a larger Citywide loop. This system gives community members a wide variety of pathway options throughout the City and to other parts of the metropolitan region. The adopted network map is included as Figure 3-7. Please refer to the Meridian Pathways Master Plan5 for specific alignments, pathway types, design specifications, detailed network descriptions, etc. The ACHD has adopted a plan that seeks to create and connect bicycle lanes throughout Ada County. The over-arching goal of the Roadways to Bikeways Bicycle Master Plan is to create a bicycle network that provides a designated bicycle facility within a quarter-mile from 95 percent of the residents in the 4 Go to http://www.compassidaho.org/prodserv/cim2035.htm 5 Go to http://www.meridiancity.org/parks_rec.aspx?id=2667 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 39 Chapter County. The City, as part of development review and ACHD roadway projects, will look to expand bicycle opportunities throughout the City. COMPASS has developed a Mobility Management Guidebook6 that includes best practices for incorporating transit access and mobility enhancements into subdivision, site, and roadway design. The Guidebook may be useful in identifying strategies for reducing reliance on the automobile. On the statewide level, I-way is a service network that connects people in Idaho to a mix of transportation options. I-way provides people in Idaho the ability to choose from a variety of connected, convenient and cost-effective transportation options–including park and rides, car and van pools, bike and walking paths, shuttles, and improved public transportation options. I-way represents a shift in the design and management of mobility options in Idaho. To meet changing future needs, this new vision focuses on the needs of people, rather than transportation modes and reorganizes the way mobility strategies are developed. The City is an active participant in I-way7. Downtown Transportation Network The City envisions a multi-modal transportation network downtown. Through the use of roadways, pathways, sidewalks, bike lanes, busses and the rail corridor, the intent is to make it easier to get to and through downtown. There are several plans and studies that evaluate where and how various opportunities for access to downtown can, and should be provided. The Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan was developed by ACHD with insight provided by the City to propose solutions to circulation-related challenges in downtown Meridian. The result of the jointly-initiated planning process was the emergence of a “Split Corridor Design” to facilitate movement throughout downtown. The “Split Corridor Design” will create a one-way traffic system between the 1-84/Meridian Road interchange and (roughly) the railroad tracks. Main Street will allow northbound traffic only, and Meridian Road will allow southbound traffic only. North of the railroad the system will support two-way traffic movement. Phase I of the Split Corridor, from I-84 to Franklin Road, was completed in 2009. Phase II of the Split Corridor is currently planned for construction in 2013. To increase connectivity and facilitate additional north-south traffic movement downtown, the City will work through development and redevelopment to preserve right-of-way and construct East 3rd from Franklin Road to Fairview Avenue per the alignment identified in the East 3rd Street Extension Alignment Study Report, dated May 2009. The May 2009 report identifies the alignment of the future roadway and presents conceptual cross-sections for use in roadway design. Pine Avenue is currently the only east-west connection to downtown between Fairview Avenue and Franklin Road, west of Locust Grove. Additional east-west 6 Go to http://www.compassidaho.org/prodserv/mobility.htm 7 Go to I-way.org “Through the use of roadways, pathways, sidewalks, bike lanes, busses and the rail corridor, the intent is to make getting to and through down- town easier. ” Chapter 40 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Figure 3-7. ADOPTeD PATHWAY NeTWOrK MAP Note: For current Pathway Network Map, please see the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation website: http://www.meridiancity.org/parks_rec.aspx?id=2667 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 41 Chapter traffic connections within downtown are needed. Extending Broadway Avenue and/or Idaho Avenue to connect with E Commercial Drive will make it easier to get to and through downtown. The City has also adopted the Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan, which is intended to preserve for and work towards long-term connectivity and streetscape improvements. State Facilities The Idaho Transportation Department has very few planned highway expansion projects in the State. However, there is certainly a need to improve the State highway system. At the top of the City’s highway improvement priority list is a rebuilt Meridian Road Interchange. The interchange is not sufficient to safely handle today’s increased traffic and mobility demands. Reconstruction of the Meridian Road Interchange will improve mobility by providing pedestrian and bicycle facilities on the structure so that different modes of transportation can traverse across the Interstate. Reconstruction will also allow free movement of commerce through the Treasure Valley and provide the infrastructure which companies here and those looking to move here desire. Two other highway improvements high on the City’s priority list are U.S. 20/26 (Chinden Boulevard) and SH-55 (Eagle Road). The Eagle Road Arterial Road Study (ITD, 2006), and the U.S. 20/26 Corridor Preservation Study, (ITD and COMPASS, ongoing), identify preferred roadway configurations and recommend safety improvements to these high-volume and high-speed facilities. The City supports access management, congestion mitigation improvements and the beautification of these corridors called for in the studies. The City of Meridian supports the construction of an overpass at the intersection of Linder Road and Interstate 84. This overpass will create a continuous, 34-mile arterial that will connect the Birds of Prey with the foothills and be one of the only roadways in the county to cross both the interstate and the Boise River. When constructed, this overpass should include an on-street pathway route along the west side of the roadway as it allows for continuation of the on-street pathway north and south of the interstate, consistent with the City’s Master Pathway Plan. Land within the future SH-16 corridor will be protected from strip commercial zoning and development. The City does not intent to strip zone land adjacent to the future highway for non-residential uses. Such uses will be targeted to key intersections and where vacant or surplus commercial space is already available and zoned. Supplemental Network Improvements To establish a more direct route, and increase connectivity between the Nampa Airport/Garrity Boulevard and the Overland Road/Ten Mile Road intersection, the Airport - Overland Corridor Study was completed in 2011. This study was conducted in partnership with the City of Nampa, ACHD, Nampa Highway District #1, Ada County, and the City. The Study evaluated feasible alignment “A day spent without the sight or sound of beauty, the contem- plation of mystery, or the search of truth or perfection is a pover- ty-stricken day; and a succession of such days is fatal to human life.” -Lewis Mumford Chapter 42 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan alternatives and associated environmental, transportation, land use and land owner issues of an extension. Ultimately, Alternative 2B was selected as the preferred alignment. As no funding is currently available, this future roadway will be constructed as adjoining properties develop, and funding partners become available. Although the centerline location identified in the Study is the preferred location, the exact location of the roadway may adjust slightly dependent upon the nature and timing of development; the Study allows for flexibility on the specific route, as long as the primary objectives of the study are achieved. The City will work with property owners, developers and ACHD to ensure Overland Road is extended west of Ten Mile Road into Canyon County as an arterial. Utilities and Infrastructure The provision, location and efficiency of public facilities contribute to quality of life and to the ability to develop in the City. While the City owns and operates its own domestic water and sewer services, it relies on other entities for some of the other essential services. Therefore, coordination between the City and each service provider is vital in planning and prioritizing of expansion areas, and continued service to existing locations. Public facilities discussed in this section include domestic water service, sewer collection, sewage treatment, and other independently operated utilities (such as power, natural gas, and communications). Water Service The City owned and operated domestic water system is currently supported by a series of deep wells, booster pump stations, multiple reservoirs, and over 400 miles of pipe line. In order to keep up with water demand, the City has constructed, on average, one new well per year, each funded by connection fees and charged to new development. Water line extensions to new developments are generally paid for and constructed by developers. Although the City plans new wells and reservoirs, the specific locations to those facilities are largely dictated by growth patterns, and will continue to be funded by new development. There is a portion of north Meridian where United Water, not the City, provides service. The rest of the City receives water from the City, via the Public Works Department. Sewer Collection The sewer (also known as wastewater) collection system in the City consists of over 500 miles of pipe and twelve lift (pump) stations. Sewage flows by gravity to the wastewater treatment plant located northwest of the Ten Mile/Ustick intersection. Generating a new Sewer Master Plan is in process. The Sewer Master Plan includes development of a computer model. The model helps Public Works staff identify priority areas for development in the City as well as segments of the existing sewage collection system that are approaching capacity. Future capital improvements will then be prioritized to upgrade the lines that are approaching capacity. No new City-funded sewer trunks or expansions are planned at this “...the City has con- structed, on average, one new well per year, each funded by connection fees and charged to new devel- opment.” City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3 43 Chapter time. After the new Sewer Master Plan and model is up and running, the City will evaluate the need for additional expansion projects. Sewage Treatment With a rated capacity of 10.2 million gallons per day (mgd), the Meridian Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) services the entire City to primary, secondary, and tertiary standards, followed by disinfection. Treated effluent is discharged into Five Mile Creek. The City of Meridian received a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permit from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in September of 1999, which expired in 2004. The discharge permit placed limits on flow, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids, dissolved oxygen, pH, toxicity, and bacteria. The permit also mandated numerous sampling and monitoring requirements for the effluent, Five Mile Creek, and the Boise River are also mandated. The Public Works Department expects to receive a new NPDES discharge permit in the next year which will include nutrient limits on phosphorus as low as 0.07 mg/L. The EPA has proposed up to a 98% reduction in the amount of total phosphorus discharged to the Lower Boise River by all point sources. In order to comply with requirements, Meridian may have to construct expensive phosphorus removal facilities at the WWTP. The additional associated costs will be apportioned to all ratepayers, although the actual construction of these additional improvements will depend on City growth rates. Currently, NPDES permits are not required for stormwater within the City. However, with increasing population growth, the City will be responsible for compliance with the Phase 2 stormwater program, thus requiring staff and funding. To keep costs down and treatment of wastewater efficient, the City is embarking on a reclaimed water project. Meridian has a Class A Reclaimed Water Permit which allows the City treat and reuse wastewater, instead of irrigation water or potable water, on City parks and open spaces near Ten Mile Road. The City would like to expand this service and it is anticipated that this highly treated water will also be made available to private property owners in other parts of the City in the near future. Garbage and Recycling Republic Services (Republic) is the solid waste and recycling collection contractor for the City of Meridian. Republic is dedicated to providing reliable and innovative recycling and waste reduction programs to the City. Every residential customer in Meridian has access to curbside recycling services as part of their basic collection services. In addition to refuse collection, recycling, and hazardous material disposal, Republic also provides fall leaf collection, spring clean-up collection, used oil collection and Christmas tree pick-up. These programs are intended to reduce the amount of organic material that would otherwise make its way to the landfill. Republic and the City are looking for additional ways to divert the amount of waste that goes to landfill. “Republic and the City are looking for additional ways to divert the amount of waste that goes to landfill.” Chapter 44 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan In 2000, the City established a Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) to help set steer a curbside recycling program and to advise the City Council on other solid waste issues. The SWAC works in conjunction with Republic staff. The SWAC focuses its attention on growing the solid waste and recycling programs and making them as user friendly as possible. Irrigation Meridian irrigation water is supplied by a series of canals and laterals diverted from the Boise River. The New York canal is operated and serviced by the Boise Project Control Board, under the Bureau of Reclamation. The Ridenbaugh and Settler’s Canal are both operated and maintained by the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District (NMID). The NMID administers water rights for all three canals. Power Idaho Power Company provides electrical services throughout the City of Meridian and its Area of City Impact. Idaho Power is a public service company regulated by the Idaho Public Utility Commission (IPUC), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and the state regulatory commissions of Idaho and Oregon. Natural Gas Intermountain Gas Company is the sole provider of natural gas in southern Idaho, including Meridian. Meridian is serviced by dual, high pressure natural gas pipelines that bisect the southwest part of the City’s Area of City Impact. Communications CenturyLink, Inc. provides basic telephone service in the area and CableOne provides traditional T.V. and internet services. There are also a number of other wireless providers which also offer phone, television, and internet services. Future Acquisitions Map Idaho Code §67-6517 allows the City to designate lands on a Future Acquisitions Map (FAM) that are proposed for public acquisition and/or facilities over the next 20 years. Facilities and utilities that could be designated on this map include, but are not limited to: fire stations, parks, open space, and recreation areas, pathways, well sites, Waste Water Treatment Plant expansion lands, utility facility corridors, streets, overpasses and highways, and some properties downtown where infrastructure is planned. The City does not have or use a FAM. Instead, a future facilities map that consolidates all City expansion and construction plans is being composed. This map, once composed, will be used for general coordination and communication, and will not be included in this Plan. However, it is envisioned that the future facilities map and the policies in this Plan be consistent and work together to guide efficient infrastructure improvements. “Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes; but no plans.” - Peter F. Drucker 45City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.01.00 Recognize that Meridian's population will continue to grow and positively influence that growth. 3.01.01 Provide facilities and services that keep up with growth. 3.01.01A Work with COMPASS to analyze and monitor demographic characteristics and trends using the Development Monitoring Report.On-going Community Development 3.01.01B Evaluate comprehensive impact of growth in all land use decisions (e.g., traffic impacts, school enrollment, parks, etc).On-going Community Development 3.01.01C Regularly calculate ultimate build-out population projections based on City’s current Comprehensive Plan policies.On-going Community Development 3.01.01D Update the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code as needed to accommodate growth trends.On-going Community Development 3.01.01E Develop incentives that encourage utilization of unimproved or underdeveloped land within City limits in order to maximize public investments, and curtail urban sprawl.Medium Community Development 3.01.01F Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.On-going Community Development 3.01.01G Evaluate development proposals based on physical, social, economic, environmental, and aesthetic criteria.On-going Community Development 3.01.01H Continuously provide essential services and utilities to all residents.On-going Council 3.01.01I Consider City Master Plans and Strategic Plans in all land use decisions. On-going Council 3.01.01J Work with transportation agencies and private property owners to preserve transportation corridors, future transit routes and infrastructure, road and highway extensions, and to facilitate access management planning. On-going Community Development 3.01.02 Ensure that land use regulations support development opportunities within the Area of City Impact. 3.01.02A Support applications that apply the neighborhood center concept.On-going Community Development 3.01.02B Establish incentives for new commercial development within under-utilized existing commercial areas.Highest Community Development 3.01.02C Support and improve upon current development review process.On-going Community Development Chapter 3 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items 46City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.01.02D Coordinate with Ada County to amend City and County Area of City Impact agreements to require Meridian land use ordinances be adopted by Ada County for developments within the Area of City Impact but outside City limits.Medium Community Development 3.01.02E [Removed]NA NA 3.02.00 Improve long range City and school district planning. 3.02.01 Jointly plan and site school and subdivision developments to ensure mutual benefits and neighborhood identity. 3.02.01A Coordinate population and household projections keeping school sites in mind.On-going Community Development 3.02.01B Support the location of school sites within every square mile.On-going Community Development 3.02.01C Support construction of multi-use facilities that can be used by both schools and the community.On-going Community Development 3.02.01D Develop programs that are more pro-active by providing more secure, safe, and fun places for children.Medium Parks 3.02.01E Actively involve West Ada School District in subdivision site selection with developer before processing applications (pre-application meetings).On-going Community Development 3.02.01F Work with West Ada School District so elementary schools are sited in locations that are safe for the children, easily accessible by automobile, transit, walking and bicycle. Elementary schools should not be "hidden" within subdivisions or otherwise made inaccessible to the public.On-going Community Development 3.02.01G Look for ways to streamline the permitting and land use review process for approval of new school facilities. On-going Community Development 3.02.01H Work with ACHD, ITD and West Ada School District to establish and map safe bicycle and pedestrian routes to schools. On-going Community Development 3.02.01I Assist West Ada School District as needed in identifying future school sites, including by providing information about potential developments and future land uses. On-going Community Development 3.02.01J Ensure compatibility of schools with neighborhoods and adjacent land uses.On-going Community Development 3.03.00 Facilitate the efficient movement of people and products to and from the Area of City Impact. 3.03.01 Support multi-modal and complete street transportation improvements. 3.03.01A Work with UPRR on constructing a multiple-use pathway through downtown.On-going Public Works 3.03.01B Support VRT’s efforts to construct a multi-modal transit center downtown.Medium Community Development 47City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.03.01C Improve ingress and egress (both pedestrian and vehicle) in Old Town.On-going Community Development 3.03.01D Pursue the extension of Idaho Ave and/or Broadway Ave to Commercial Drive.Medium Community Development 3.03.01E Pursue construction of the City’s pathway network to and through downtown.On-going Parks 3.03.01F Pursue bicycle routes/lanes to and through downtown.On-going Community Development 3.03.01G Work with ACHD to implement projects from the Downtown Meridian Pedestrian and Bicycle survey.On-going Community Development 3.03.01H Work with ACHD to increase awareness that pedestrians are part of the community and utilize criteria for plan review in determining whether a development proposal is pedestrian safe, accessible, and comfortable.On-going Community Development 3.03.02 Enhance existing transportation systems. 3.03.02A Work with COMPASS, ACHD, ITD and other regional partners to develop and manage a well- planned, sustainable, multi-modal transportation system.On-going Community Development 3.03.02B Pursue the extension of East 3rd Street from Fairview to Pine and a future signal at East 3rd Street / Fairview.Medium Community Development 3.03.02C Pursue the extension of Overland Road, west of Ten Mile Road into Canyon County, consistent with the 2011 Airport-Overland Corridor Study. On-going Community Development 3.03.02D Pursue sidewalk construction for existing substandard streets.On-going Community Development 3.03.02E Develop continuous pedestrian walkways within the downtown area.On-going Community Development 3.03.02F Consider ACHD's Complete Streets policy and Transportation and Land Use Integration Plan (TLIP) in all land-use decisions.On-going Community Development 3.03.02G Consider the adopted COMPASS regional long-range transportation plan in all land-use decisions.On-going Community Development 3.03.02H Encourage and promote the development of an overpass at the intersection of Linder Road and I-84 by ITD and ACHD. The overpass should accommodate pedestrians.Medium Community Development 3.03.02I Encourage and promote the development of an interchange at the intersection of McDermott Road / SH-16 Road extension and I-84 by ITD.Medium Community Development 3.03.02J Encourage and promote construction of Eagle Road corridor improvements.On-going Community Development 48City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.03.02K [Removed]NA NA 3.03.02L Encourage and promote the preservation and expansion of Chinden Boulevard (US 20/26) by ITD.Highest Community Development 3.03.02M [Removed]NA NA 3.03.02N Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross- access agreements, access management, and frontage / backage roads.On-going Community Development 3.03.02O Review new development for appropriate opportunities to connect local roads and collectors to adjacent properties (stub streets).On-going Community Development 3.03.02P Require the improving and maintaining of landscaping along public rights-of-way and landscaping of dedicated but unimproved rights-of-way strips.On-going Community Development 3.03.02Q Consider needed sidewalk, pathway, and lighting improvements along with all land-use decisions along SH-55.On-going Community Development 3.03.02R Improve coordination with ACHD, ITD, VRT, COMPASS and developers in addressing transportation issues and needs before public hearings. Highest Community Development 3.03.02S Work with ACHD, neighborhoods, and the city's Transportation Commission to promote traffic calming and safety where problems exist.On-going Community Development 3.03.02T Work with ACHD to establish and implement a system of performance measures to gauge whether transportation goals and objectives are being realized.Medium Community Development 3.03.02U Work with ACHD to establish a "feedback loop" to further Meridian's planning objectives and interests.High Community Development 3.03.03 Provide the most efficient transportation network possible. 3.03.03A Work with transportation agencies to establish truck routes.Lowest Public Works 3.03.03B Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system. On-going Community Development 3.03.03C Require street connections between subdivisions at regular intervals to enhance connectivity and better traffic flow.On-going Community Development 3.03.03D Develop alternative modes of transportation through pedestrian improvements, bicycle lanes, off-street pathways, and transit-oriented development as appropriate.On-going Community Development 49City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.03.03E Except in North Meridian and the Ten Mile Specific Area, where a specific collector system is planned, realize continuous collectors at regular intervals around the north-south and east-west half-mile lines within the undeveloped sections of Meridian's Area of City Impact at the time of new development. Such collectors should be the primary designated bike lane routes in lieu of arterial streets, whenever possible. On-going Community Development 3.03.03F Require the public street system to be continuous through each mile section. This does not preclude the use of traffic calming measures, nor does it imply the roadway have a straight alignment.On-going Community Development 3.03.03G Participate in the development of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). On-going Community Development 3.03.03H Work with neighborhood groups to identify gaps in the sidewalk system that need to be filled in.On-going Community Development 3.03.04 Encourage new and alternative transportation systems to accommodate growth. 3.03.04A Support COMPASS efforts to study the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) corridor for multi-use pathway and mass transit.On-going Community Development 3.03.04B Explore additional mobility options for people who do not drive; use COMPASS' Mobility Management Checklist.Medium- High Community Development 3.03.04C Develop and implement agreements with NMID, other irrigation districts, and UPRR to allow use of easements for recreation, bike/pedestrian pathways by the City.On-going Parks 3.03.04D In cooperation with COMPASS, VRT, and ACHD, continue to investigate the opportunities for providing Park & Ride lots, shuttle buses, and other forms of alternative transportation.On-going Community Development 3.03.04E Work with ACHD, VRT and other agencies, community groups, local employers and citizens to identify and promote strategies for reducing reliance on the automobile.On-going Community Development 3.03.04F Preserve the existing rail corridor for a future transit system between Boise and Nampa.On-going Community Development 3.03.04G Work with COMPASS and VRT on bringing public transportation to and through Meridian.Medium Community Development 3.03.04H Work with ACHD, COMPASS, and VRT to identify specific parcels for future park & ride lots and/or transit stations.Medium Community Development 3.03.04I The City, in coordination with VRT and COMPASS, should explore grants and other funding opportunities to provide incentives for developers to locate within areas planned for transit.Medium Community Development 3.03.04J Develop design guidelines for transit stations.Lowest Community Development 50City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.03.04K Consider ACHD's MSM (Master Street Map) in all land use decisions. On-going Community Development 3.03.04L Assist in meeting the transportation needs of non-drivers.On-going Community Development 3.03.04M Support alternative public and private sector funding opportunities for transportation investment.On-going Community Development 3.03.04N Promote the rail line as a multi-modal corridor. On-going Public Works 3.04.00 Expand, improve, and maintain the City's infrastructure to meet existing and growing demands in a timely, orderly, and logical manner. 3.04.01 Develop and follow logical master plans for all public facilities, services and safety to guide the growth of the City. 3.04.01A [Removed]NA NA 3.04.01B Annually review master plans for public facilities and services; update as needed.On-going All 3.04.01C Coordinate with other public utilities and essential service providers at annual master plan reviews.On-going All 3.04.01D Identify growth priority areas for future City expansion.On-going All 3.04.01E Develop City utilities in priority areas.On-going Public Works 3.04.01F Explore options to annex County parcels that are contiguous with City limits to allow for more efficient provision of City services.Medium Community Development 3.04.01G Protect citizen investments in existing public facilities (water, sewer, streets, fire, police, etc.) by encouraging controlled growth through development application reviews and development agreements.On-going Community Development 3.04.01H Coordinate with public works, police, and fire departments on proposed annexation and development requests, and the impacts on services.On-going Community Development 3.04.01I Review and update existing and future service needs.On-going All 3.04.01J Annually assess and compare response times to adopted standards for identification of needed growth.On-going Police / Fire 3.04.01K Continually improve public participation in matters relating to financing, construction and location of public facilities. On-going Public Works 3.04.01L Support expansion of City facilities and staff based on growth.On-going Council 51City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.04.01M [Removed]NA NA 3.04.01N Phase in residential developments in accordance with their connection to the municipal sewer and water system.On-going Community Development 3.04.02 Build services to areas of opportunity and promote future development of commercial, industrial, retail/service and residential to best protect objectives and integrity of Meridian. 3.04.02A Locate industrial and commercial uses where adequate water supply and water pressure are available for fire protection.On-going Community Development 3.04.02B Encourage infill development.Medium Community Development 3.05.00 Ensure a variety and balance of land uses to support the Meridian Area of City Impact. 3.05.01 Plan for periodic review, monitoring, and updating of land uses within the Area of City Impact and the Urban Service Planning Area. 3.05.01A Evaluate the allocation of land uses along the rail corridor, particularly the amount of land envisioned for industrial use; coordinate with UPRR and other stakeholders. High Community Development 3.05.01B Coordinate with COMPASS, UPRR, ACHD, VRT, and private property owners to ensure land uses that are compatible and will integrate with freight movement and a future rail corridor transit system.Medium Community Development 3.05.01C Update the Future Land Use Map to reflect existing facilities.On-going Community Development 3.05.01D Annually calculate percentage of each major land use category developed during previous year and compare to existing supply of vacant land in each category.On-going Community Development 3.05.01E Locate small-scale neighborhood commercial areas within planned residential developments as part of the development plan.On-going Community Development 3.05.01F Amend the Unified Development Code and Future Land Use Map to implement this plan.On-going Community Development 3.05.01G Encourage research and employment opportunities in the northwest quadrant of Area of City Impact. Highest Community Development 3.05.01H Designate land for a variety of uses.On-going Community Development 3.05.01I Consider Specific Area Plan funding for areas of interest on the Future Land Use Map.On-going Community Development 3.05.01J Plan for a variety of commercial and retail opportunities within the Area of City Impact.On-going Community Development 52City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.05.01K Monitor and adjust accordingly, the amount of industrial areas needed to meet the employment needs of the City.On-going Economic Development 3.05.02 Maintain integrity of neighborhoods to preserve values and ambiance of areas. 3.05.02A Require neighborhood and community commercial areas to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses (e.g., landscaping, fences, etc.).On-going Community Development 3.05.02B Develop standards for integrating higher density residential into existing subdivision development.On-going Community Development 3.05.02C Require new residential development to meet development standards regarding landscaping, signage, fences and walls, etc.On-going Community Development 3.05.02D Enforce City codes.On-going Police 3.05.02E Permit schools, churches, and other public and civic uses in rural areas, that are compatible with adjacent uses.On-going Community Development 3.05.02F Require new urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing low density residential land uses to provide landscaped screening or transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between urban level densities and rural residential densities. On-going Community Development 3.05.02G Evaluate the need for new residential development to provide permanent perimeter fencing, and fencing to contain construction debris on site and prevent windblown debris from entering adjacent agricultural and other properties.On-going Community Development 3.05.03 Plan for appropriate uses within rural areas. 3.05.03A Identify transitional areas to buffer commercial and residential uses, to allow uses such as offices and other low intensity uses.On-going Community Development 3.05.03B Permit low-density (one unit per 5-10 acres) residential uses where City services can not be provided. On-going Community Development 3.05.03C Require rural area residential development to submit alternative development plan to allow for the efficient extension of urban services in the future (resubdivision plan).On-going Community Development 3.05.03D Coordinate with Ada County and establish and maintain an Area of City Impact Agreement, to ensure that rural areas are developed in accordance with all applicable provisions of this plan.On-going Community Development 3.05.03E Allow residential development in rural areas that are outside the City limits but inside the Area of City Impact, provided it is not feasible to connect development to City sewer and water service, and when required by the City, development provides dry line sewer and water lines for future connection; and a concept plan for roads and lots showing that re-subdivision of the property in the future, to urban densities consistent with the Future Land Use Map is possible. On-going Community Development 53City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.05.03F Permit recreational uses that are compatible with agricultural pursuits in the rural areas.On-going Community Development 3.05.03G Evaluate feasibility of establishing preservation standards and incentives for protecting the long- term use of land with prime agricultural soils for agricultural purposes. Highest Community Development 3.06.00 Encourage compatible uses to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land. 3.06.01 Proactively address potential conflicts between incompatible uses. 3.06.01A Require industrial areas to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses (e.g., landscape, fences, etc.) and community design criteria.On-going Community Development 3.06.01B Minimize noise, odor, air pollution, and visual pollution in industrial and commercial development adjacent to residential areas.On-going Community Development 3.06.01C Encourage industrial development to locate adjacent to existing industrial uses.On-going Community Development 3.06.01D Require industrial development to conform to Federal and State air, water, and noise pollution standards, and local landscaping, traffic, noise, and environmental standards.On-going Community Development 3.06.01E Require screening and buffering of commercial and industrial properties to residential use with transitional zoning.On-going Community Development 3.06.01F Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels.On-going Community Development 3.06.01G Require screening and landscape buffers on all development requests that are more intense than adjacent residential properties.On-going Community Development 3.06.01H Support land uses that do not harm natural systems and resources. On-going Community Development 3.06.01I Preserve and protect industrial lands for continued industrial use.On-going Community Development 3.06.02 Support appropriate land uses along transportation corridors. 3.06.02A Review current regulations for issues that would prohibit or discourage the type of mixed-use, transit-oriented development desired within areas planned for transit.High Community Development 3.06.02B Cluster new community commercial areas on arterials or collectors near residential areas in such a way as to complement adjoining residential areas. On-going Community Development 3.06.02C Identify locations for low traffic-generating uses on key corridors.Low Community Development 3.06.02D Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets.On-going Community Development 54City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.06.02E Integrate transportation plans and studies into the Comprehensive Plan and City ordinances. On-going Community Development 3.06.02F Require appropriate landscaping and buffers along transportation corridor (setback, vegetation, low walls, berms, etc.).On-going Community Development 3.06.02G Develop incentives for high-density development along major transportation corridors to support public transportation system.Low Community Development 3.06.02H Coordinate with ACHD, ITD, COMPASS, and other agencies to determine future infrastructure plans, transportation corridors, highway alignments, etc. and allow only compatible adjacent land uses, appropriate site designs and traffic patterns.On-going Community Development 3.06.02I Explore with ACHD the possibility of reduced transportation impact fees for development along public transportation systems (existing or planned).Medium Community Development 3.07.00 Offer a diversity of housing types for a greater range of choice. 3.07.01 Encourage quality housing projects for all economic levels throughout the City. 3.07.01A Amend the Unified Development Code and Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to ensure a wide variety of housing types can be developed and properly zoned and land is available. On-going Community Development 3.07.01B Annually monitor building permit activity to ensure a diversity of housing is being maintained.On-going Community Development 3.07.01C Promote high density residential development in Old Town.High Community Development 3.07.01D Adopt land use designations that will allow for housing opportunities for all income levels.On-going Community Development 3.07.01E Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, medium-high and high-density single- family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities.On-going Community Development 3.07.01F Provide incentives (density bonus, reduced open space requirements, less impact fees) for infill development.On-going Community Development 3.07.01G Designate areas for high density residential on the Future Land Use Map.On-going Community Development 3.07.01H Require an open housing market for all persons, regardless of protected class, ie: race, sex, age, religion, disability, handicap, family status or ethnic background.On-going Legal 3.07.01I Develop incentives for a variety of housing types, suitable for various income groups.On-going Community Development 3.07.01J Ensure that no discriminatory restrictions are imposed by local codes and ordinances.On-going Legal 55City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.07.01K Look for incentives to encourage the development of accessible, single-family home designs.On-going Community Development 3.07.01L Coordinate public and private housing implementation efforts to improve consistency with local housing plans.On-going Community Development 3.07.01M Review ordinances or other policy statements which affect housing development and consolidate to avoid confusion and conflicting policies and requirements.Highest Community Development 3.07.01N Diversify and balance the location of up to 1,200 square foot housing throughout the City (e.g., avoid concentration of one housing type in a geographical area).Low Community Development 3.07.02 Elevate/enhance quality of residential site and subdivision planning.  3.07.02A Require usable open space to be incorporated into new residential subdivision plats.On-going Community Development 3.07.02B Consistent with the Transportation and Land Use Integration Plan, require all new residential neighborhoods to provide sidewalks, curb and gutters, and complete streets.On-going Community Development 3.07.02C Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood connectivity.On-going Community Development 3.07.02D Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers.On-going Community Development 3.07.02E Use the Architectural Standards Manual.On-going Community Development 3.07.02F Require common area in all subdivisions.On-going Community Development 3.07.02G Re-evaluate residential density categories (i.e., R-8 to R-15 to R-40 is too broad of a range) in Unified Development Code.Medium Community Development 3.07.02H Eliminate vague/unclear standards in development ordinances; keep Unified Development Code current and user-friendly.On-going Community Development 3.07.02I Support infill of vacant lots in substantially developed, single-family areas at densities similar to surrounding development. Increased densities on vacant lots may be considered if structures are compatible with surrounding development.On-going Community Development 3.07.02J Explore the option of the City acquiring vacant lots to hold for future consolidation of lots and / or development.Low Community Development 3.07.02K Apply design and construction standards to infilling development in order to reduce adverse impacts upon existing adjacent development.On-going Community Development 3.07.02L Locate high-density development, where possible, near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, Old Town, and near major access thoroughfares.On-going Community Development 56City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 3Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 3.07.02M Evaluate the potential to use density transfers through Planned Unit Developments in exchange for school sites, open space dedications, or for access easements to linear open space corridors, which contain bicycle and/or pedestrian pathway systems.Medium Community Development 3.07.02N Ensure development provides safe routes and access to schools, parks and other community gathering places.On-going Community Development 3.07.02O Evaluate the need for design review guidelines for single-family homes, particularly in Old Town.Medium Community Development 3.07.03 Ensure that a balance exists between supply and demand in rental market. 3.07.03A Identify the current mix of housing types, with COMPASS.On-going Community Development 3.07.03B Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family and multi-family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development.On-going Community Development 3.07.03C Track vacancy rates.On-going Economic Development City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 4 57 Chapter Chapter 4 – Economic Excellence This section of the Comprehensive Plan gives context to the City’s goals, objectives, and action items regarding economic development and provides the framework for growing Meridian’s economy. Policy decisions reflect Meridian’s goal of improving and diversifying the local economy to ensure a sustainable economic tax base. Economic Development Meridian is actively supporting existing and new businesses in order to retain and create new jobs, develop regional talent, foster innovation and increase tax base to promote a community that is proactive, responsive and sustainable. Some of the new businesses that the City is working to develop are: • Health Science (Medical Device Manufacturing) • Health Care Services • Info-technology • Corporate & Professional Services • Entrepreneurial Innovation • Food Processors • Light Manufacturing • Outdoor Sports Manufacturing • Alternative Energy Meridian’s location, in the center of the Pacific Northwest, gives the City an advantage in regional recognition. Meridian offers companies direct access to 66 million consumers within a 750-mile radius. In addition, Meridian provides companies with a diverse pool of motivated and dedicated workers. The City of Meridian is committed to economic excellence, and is committed to supporting and growing new and existing businesses. The City seeks to create a strong and diverse business community that is “Built for Business and Designed for Living.” As part of its commitment to economic excellence, the City has developed Business Enterprise Areas and Specific Area Plans to encourage and promote a robust and sustainable economy. Chapter 58 4 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Business Enterprise Areas / Specific Area Plans Meridian is effectively positioned to support existing, emerging, and new businesses by creating planned and integrated Business Enterprise Areas. These areas are designed to attract and foster related or complimentary business interests. This provides an environment where business can thrive in an atmosphere conducive to attracting and retaining a highly qualified workforce. These Business Enterprise Areas, located throughout the City, are diverse in approach and geared towards accommodating the needs of business and employees alike. The Core. The Core, located on the eastern edge of Meridian along I-84, is focused on fostering an environment for health sciences, technology and business centers. The Core is a community of partners and programs, like those between the City of Meridian and Idaho State University, creating sustainable jobs, developing products, training, and research to better the lives of those in Meridian, the Valley, and abroad. With over 43 active enterprises, The Core is business diversity of the future; jobs in research, development, and manufacturing that cannot be outsourced. This corridor of complementary businesses and services provides a one-stop destination for visitors and workforce with all necessary amenities. In the fall of 2009, Idaho State University opened the doors to ISU-Meridian, the Treasure Valley campus, within The Core. Students at ISU specialize in Law and Leadership, Research and Medical Arts, and International Studies. The City has been working with ISU to not only strengthen educational programs but to create partnerships with the private sector. The ISU President’s Southwestern Idaho Advisory Council on Health Science Education and Economic Excellence focuses on specific business and research opportunities. This Council of business and educational leaders helps prepare ISU to expand health science education opportunities and support the efforts of The Core. Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan. The Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP), centered along Ten Mile Road and I-84, is a highly visible, easily accessible part of the City that will offer significant employment, enhance housing diversity, and support a strong economy. The TMISAP, while sharing the same heart for economic development as the other business enterprise areas, is built for living; creating an environment for people to work, live, and play. Unlike other commercial employment districts, with diversity of mixed, adjacent, and nearby housing in a broad spectrum of sizes and costs, the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan8 seeks to create a highly accessible community that removes the need to commute to work. Urban Renewal Area (Downtown) - The Meridian Development Corporation (MDC) and the City are committed to the economic stimulation and expansion of downtown Meridian. Focus areas for creating a thriving Downtown Meridian include: pedestrian friendly, transit support, sustainable job creation, public art and beautification, affordable workforce housing, public parking, and a balanced retail environment. As part of its long-term goals, MDC is committed to supporting Destination Downtown, a Vision Plan for downtown Meridian. Destination 8 Go to http://www.meridiancity.org/planning.aspx?id=242 “This corridor of complementary busi- nesses and services provides a one-stop destination for visitors and workforce with all necessary ameni- ties.” City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 4 59 Chapter Downtown9 is a community-driven initiative, spearheaded by the MDC, to stimulate, vitalize, and establish downtown Meridian as a hub of Treasure Valley enterprise, culture, and social activities. Destination Downtown has four focus areas: Livability, Mobility, Prosperity, and Sustainability. Each of these focus areas represents a vital cornerstone in support of the long-term health and vitality of downtown Meridian and the City as a whole. The City intends to build on the Destination Downtown plan by partnering with the MDC to do specific catalyst projects, consistent with each of the four focus areas identified in the Plan. With the construction of the City Hall building in 2008, and the COMPASS/VRT building in 2011, the City and the MDC have made commitments to downtown that will serve as catalysts for additional revitalization efforts and set the standard for future development in Meridian’s downtown. Fields Area. Located in northwest Meridian, the Fields is a six-square mile area bound by the Ada-Canyon county line, Chinden Boulevard, Ustick Road and Black Cat Road. This area has been identified by the City for a future specific area plan. Like the other Business Enterprise Areas, the Fields Area will be conceived principally to grow business and develop increased economic vitality. Unlike Ten Mile, The Core, and the Downtown plans however, the Fields Area will support 9 Go to www.destination-downtown.org Figure 4-1. buSiNeSS eNTerPriSe AreAS Chapter 60 4 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan future growth and development away from I-84, providing northwest Meridian with its own Business Enterprise Area, ensuring diverse and equally dispersed opportunity throughout the City. Chamber of Commerce The Meridian Chamber of Commerce principle goal is of supporting and developing business. The Chamber is a membership organization which provides leadership opportunities, advocacy, networking, and business promotion, to encourage, foster, and promote existing and new business opportunities in the City. The Meridian Chamber of Commerce provides many services to the community, including: business referrals, City information, community maps, relocation packets, tourist information, consulting, and more. 61City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 4Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 4.01.00 Make Meridian the premier place to live, work and raise a family. 4.01.01 Diversify economic base of City - make Meridian a self-sustaining community. 4.01.01A Build upon/take advantage of the City’s location between Nampa and Boise and promote the regional concept.High Economic Development 4.01.01B Provide unique destination-type activities and centers.High Economic Development 4.01.01C Provide incentives and standards to attract high-quality businesses.High Economic Development 4.01.01D Develop and maintain methods to promote the business community (e.g., web site development, brochures, advertising).Highest Economic Development 4.01.01E Develop a selection criteria list for business types, and incorporate it into the development review process.Medium Community Development 4.01.01F Encourage high-tech, research, pharmaceutical firms, and high-quality retail facilities.On-going Economic Development 4.01.02 Create a balanced cross section of incomes. 4.01.02A Annually monitor changes in income levels.On-going Economic Development 4.01.02B Monitor supply of housing stock by tenure and income.On-going Community Development 4.01.02C Pursue grants for economic development and public-private partnerships.On-going Economic Development 4.01.02D Raise awareness through educational outreach activities to major employers and policy makers about the benefit of workforce housing and explore possibilities for creating / sustaining workforce housing.On-going Community Development 4.02.00 Support existing businesses by creating new opportunities; be more focused on the expansion of existing businesses and create an overall friendly environment in which to do business. 4.02.01 Promote business retention, expansion and improvement programs.  4.02.01A Establish and maintain relationships with existing businesses and industries to determine present and future needs. On-going Economic Development 4.02.01B Create and maintain a business registry and database. High Economic Development Chapter 4 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items 62City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 4Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 4.02.01C Coordinate with the Meridian Chamber of Commerce to form a systematic business visitation program based on industry clusters. High Economic Development 4.02.01D Establish an annual business survey. High Economic Development 4.02.01E Create a program of ‘Ambassadors’ engaging the community businesses in supporting economic development in order to develop consistent leadership and a sense of community. On-going Economic Development 4.02.01F Encourage and provide resources for companies to access a global market.On-going Economic Development 4.02.01G Partner with local, state, regional and federal resources to provide companies with a ‘one stop shop’ for incentives and opportunities.Highest Economic Development 4.02.01H Develop a new business website that reaches an international market and creates a business friendly model of services and delivers comprehensive information about Meridian.Highest Economic Development 4.02.01I Make Meridian a city that embraces and promotes the entrepreneurial spirit with onsite resources targeted to meet the needs of innovative, start-up companies.Highest Economic Development 4.02.02 Proactively streamline government processes, identify and resolve issues and/or concerns before they reach a critical stage, and create an inviting environment within Meridian City Hall as an enjoyable place to do business.  4.02.02A Produce a guide for existing and prospective business which includes the permit application process, zoning overviews and economic incentives.Highest Economic Development 4.02.02B Review and adapt to the changing needs of the business community through progressive solutions to government procedures.On-going Economic Development 4.02.03 Identify needs to fill gaps in needed workforce skills to support existing business and create innovate training opportunities to fill those gaps.  4.02.03A Coordinate efforts with the Department of Labor to determine education and training needs and catalogue to identify deficiencies.On-going Economic Development 4.02.03B Coordinate with all local, regional, and state education institutions to provide job-oriented education and training programs to match existing and anticipated business and industry needs.On-going Economic Development 4.02.03C Provide information on available training programs with local colleges and organizations and provide contact information.On-going Economic Development 4.02.03D Engage all educational levels (K-12) to develop a highly educated and innovative workforce with an entrepreneurial mindset.High Economic Development 4.03.00 Make Meridian the premier location for business in the region by recruiting and attracting new businesses to the area. 4.03.01 Create branding, tools, and relationships necessary to attract and recruit new businesses to the Treasure Valley.  63City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 4Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 4.03.01A Develop a specific brand positioning and marketing plan for the City’s economic development activities that will identify and differentiate Meridian while clearly defining its opportunities and advantages.On-going Economic Development 4.03.01B Create a GIS database of available properties with detailed information on infrastructure and entitlements.Highest Community Development 4.03.01C Develop a marketing plan and materials for targeted industries Highest Economic Development 4.03.01D Develop relationships and maintain contact with sources of new business referrals and opportunistic prospects.On-going Economic Development 4.03.02 Develop Meridian as an economic development driving force that creates dynamic, sustainable and synergistic environments through the development of industrial corridors and target markets. 4.03.02A Explore potential partnering opportunities with like-minded organizations for purposes of merging, affiliating, aligning or collaborating.On-going Mayor's Office / All 4.03.02B Determine feasibility market for agglomerations based on geographical attributions, workforce skills and research and development activities.High Economic Development 4.03.02C Create a database of industry clusters in the area with details about their capabilities. The database would create synergies among businesses, as well as attract new companies that would desire the same local talent and research.High Economic Development 4.03.02D Identify and allocate locations/inventory for industrial and commercial business parks.Medium Community Development 4.03.02E Capitalize the City’s location along the Western Heritage Byway (SH-69/Meridian Road); promote the corridor for tourism, business expansion and its proximity to downtown. Medium Economic Development 4.04.00 Create a positive environment that supports downtown as the vibrant heart of the community. 4.04.01 Support redevelopment opportunities in downtown. 4.04.01A Research potential sites for parking garages.Medium Economic Development 4.04.01B Acquire land and develop parking facilities that are available to the public and downtown employers.High Council 4.04.01C Provide plazas and public areas and integrate them as destinations that provide places for recreation, social gathering, and civic activities. On-going Community Development 4.04.01D Maintain existing public areas in downtown (e.g., Generations Plaza area, community center, City Hall)On-going Parks 4.04.01E Research potential sites with the Meridian Development Corporation for entertainment venues and a civic center in downtown.Highest Mayor's Office 64City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 4Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 4.04.01F Promote implementation of the action items identified in the Destination Downtown plan.Highest Community Development 4.04.01G Pursue Community Development Block Grants and other funding sources for improvements in Old Town.High Community Development 4.04.01H Develop programs with the Meridian Development Corporation to encourage and support development of the arts, cultural and educational facilities in Old Town.On-going Finance 4.04.01I Develop incentives to encourage higher density housing throughout Old Town.Medium Community Development 4.04.01J Develop programs to attract customer-oriented businesses that encourage pedestrian facilities and uses downtown.High Community Development 4.04.01K Support compatible uses which will attract a high daytime and nighttime population to the downtown area.On-going Community Development 4.04.01L Develop and support downtown cultural activities and events.On-going Mayor's Office 4.04.01M Provide signage with the Meridian Development Corporation to attract people downtown.Highest Mayor's Office 4.04.01N Work with the Meridian Development Corporation to establish thematic or uniform signage downtown.High Mayor's Office 4.04.01O Implement the City of Meridian Design Standards and City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual that will ensure that downtown remains the historic center for mixed-use tourism, business, retail, residential, and governmental activities.On-going Community Development 4.04.01P Create and maintain a distinct identity for downtown through consistent landscaping, street lighting, street furnishings, and rehabilitation of existing buildings.On-going All 4.04.01Q Support development that aligns with districts identified in the Destination Downtown plan.Highest Community Development 4.04.01R Complete a public-private demonstration project that maximizes resources.Medium Economic Development 4.04.01S Develop incentives to attract new and retain the existing institutional, commercial, and government facilities to remain/locate in Old Town.High Economic Development 4.04.01T Encourage infill development.High Community Development 4.04.01U Assist potential businesses with locating in downtown by providing process incentives.Highest Community Development City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5 65 Chapter Chapter 5 – Stewardship This chapter discusses the City’s ongoing commitment and obligation to be good stewards of the public trust. As part of this chapter, we discuss the natural and built environment, sustainability, hazardous areas, and historic resources. Natural Resources Productive agricultural soils, open space, vegetation, air, water, and energy are all valuable resources that the residents of Meridian enjoy and want to preserve. Beyond the environmental and health benefits realized from preserving our natural resources, they can offer exciting recreational opportunities, provide for pedestrian travel ways, and offer a simple break from the standard suburban affair. As growth continues however, increased pressures are placed on natural resources. Finding a balance that protects and preserves Meridian’s natural resources, while supporting the need for new development and growth is essential. Water One of our most valuable resources is water. Therefore, protecting our aquifers, drainage basins, creeks, canals, lakes (man made or otherwise) and the Boise River from dangerous polluted runoffs is of great importance for preserving a quality water supply. With a vision for sustainability, Meridian became the first city in Idaho to be issued a Class A Reclaimed Water Permit. The City is now using highly treated, or reclaimed water, instead of irrigation water or potable water on City parks and open spaces. This conserves a significant amount of ground water and reduces our discharge flows into the Boise River. With successful pilot projects completed, plans are in place to increase programs that look towards water conservation, protection of surface waters and improved of water quality. Soil and Vegetation Not only is preserving the water supply important for humans, but also for the plants and wildlife. The natural tree and shrub corridors along the creeks and drains throughout Meridian are critical to wildlife and also present aesthetic values. In addition, the natural vegetation provides shade and habitat for wildlife and reduces soil erosion. Chapter 66 5 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Air Quality The City is trying to do its part to help the Treasure Valley’s overall air quality so that the region does not fall below federally mandated standards (non-attainment). The City of Meridian continues to be proactive in its efforts to improve air quality in the Treasure Valley. The City has held town hall meetings on business emissions, established City Hall as a Clean Air Zone, encouraged alternative transportation and carpooling for employees, and installed conditioning equipment at the Waste Water Treatment Plant that scrubs, cleans, and then reuses the methane gas by-product. By working with the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), supporting other local and regional initiatives, implementing City policies, evaluating land use and transportation relationships, and by City departments and contracted entities using best management practices, the City intends to raise the bar even higher for improving air quality. Energy In an effort to improve the energy efficiency, transparency, accountability, and innovation of local government, the City of Meridian decided to prepare an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy (EECS). The EECS outlines the City of Meridian‘s long-range plans to integrate energy efficiency and energy independence, sustainability, resource conservation, environmental stewardship, improvements in air quality, and reductions in greenhouse gasses into the everyday operations of City government. As part of the energy strategy, the City’s mission, vision, and ongoing initiatives were incorporated into the energy planning process. These factors will be integral in directing policy options and for implementing the City’s current and future energy projects. Moreover, they will help to guide and centralize the energy planning process. The City of Meridian developed the Citywide energy strategy as a guide for achieving both short-range and long-range objectives for energy efficiency, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and the creation of sustainable jobs. The City will achieve short-range energy goals by allocating funding towards projects that accomplish these goals. A comprehensive list of future energy projects is included in the EECS that demonstrates the City’s long-range commitment to energy efficiency. The energy-related projects, programs, policies, and implementation measures identified in the planning process of the energy strategy facilitate the City’s long-range energy success. Sustainability The City of Meridian has assertively stepped-up to the challenges and dynamics of incorporating sustainability concepts into a variety of projects. From tackling energy conservation issues; establishing a state-of-the-art wastewater treatment and reclamation facility; to establishing and staffing an Environmental Division within the Public Works Department. “Sustainability and Environmental Awareness” is a stated priority issue of City leadership and will be a dynamic aspect of how “The City of Meridian has assertively stepped- up to the challenges and dynamics of incor- porating sustainability concepts into a variety of projects.” City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5 67 Chapter future service, programs and projects are understood, created and implemented. Future success bodes well, due to the accomplishments gained in our recent past; sustainable practices today are applied in Meridian in a wide variety of ways, and will continue to grow. Green Building Where buildings are constructed and how they are designed, built and operated greatly impacts the environment. In 1998 the U.S. Green Building Council developed a set of standards for environmentally sustainable design, construction and operation of buildings. These standards are formalized in certifying a building as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design). LEED is an internationally recognized green building certification system, providing third-party verification that a building or community was designed and built using strategies aimed at improving performance across all the metrics that matter most: energy savings, water efficiency, CO2 emissions reduction, improved indoor environmental quality, and stewardship of resources and sensitivity to their impacts. LEED is a voluntary certification program that can be applied to any building type and any building lifecycle phase. Guidelines encouraging buildings to be sited and designed consistent with LEED concepts are included in the City’s Architectural Standards Manual. As a prime example of the City’s ongoing efforts to be good stewards of the environment and to set a positive example for others who build in Meridian, City Hall was constructed with LEED certification in mind. In 2009, Meridian City Hall achieved the Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED), Silver Certification. Among other benefits, Idaho Power Company has calculated City Hall’s annual energy savings to be the equivalent of providing power to 56 homes for an entire year. The City would like to pursue other energy efficient projects, and promote others to also consider environmental impacts when siting and constructing projects. Recycling and Hazardous Waste The curbside recycling program within the City (operated by Sanitary Services Company) currently allows for the following items: mixed waste paper (including telephone books), corrugated cardboard, magazines and catalogs, aluminum and tin cans, newspaper, and all numbers of plastic bottles, tubs, jugs (including lids) and clamshells. Increased recycling for paper/wood products, plastics, and organic material and diversion of hazardous waste from the landfill continue to be programs that Sanitary Services Company and the City work on expanding. Hazardous Areas Fortunately, very few natural or man-made hazards exist within the City of Meridian and its Area of City Impact. Without large industrial complexes, airports, petroleum tank farms and other uses which generate safety and pollution concerns, the City is relatively free of hazardous areas. As more development occurs however, safety concerns and hazardous areas will likely increase from more service stations, increased traffic, and storage of hazardous chemicals associated “Good fortune is what happens when opportunity meets with planning.” - Thomas Alva Edison Chapter 68 5 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan with certain businesses. While federal regulations provide protection to a degree, as development increases, so will the potential for spills, accidents, and fires. The City coordinates with Ada County Emergency Management on natural hazard disaster preparedness, response, and mitigation and is a plan participant in the Ada County Hazard Mitigation Plan. There are a few notable hazards which do exist within the City of Meridian’s AOCI; a natural gas pipeline, an existing liquefied natural gas plant, state highways, and areas of the City which fall into the 100 year floodplain. The natural gas line, or Williams Pipeline, runs from the northwest edge of the City to the southeastern edge of the City. Along this pipeline is a natural gas plant, located off of N. Can-Ada Road, which temporarily liquefies natural gas for storage. The City has worked with emergency responders and the pipeline company to ensure development near these facilities is done safely. There are four State (ITD) highways that go through Meridian: Interstate-84, State Highway 55 (Eagle Road), State Highway 69 (Meridian Road) and US 20/26 (Chinden Boulevard). These facilities are high-speed roadways which have led to many accidents. In City Code, there are specific development standards for properties along State highways. These standards are in place to mitigate the potential hazards from living next to and driving on the State highway system. Portions of Meridian fall within the 100-year floodplain, generally along the Boise River and some creeks, the City has developed a floodplain overlay district which helps to guide development. Uses permitted in this district are generally associated with open space, recreational, and agricultural land uses and do not hinder the movement of the floodwaters. For additional, information including floodway maps, see the Existing Conditions Report2. Special Areas and Historic Resources Currently there are eight properties within Meridian listed on the National Register of Historic Places. In addition to these eight properties, there are many historical architectural resources within the City limits and even more within the Area of City Impact. Some of the many historic buildings within the Area of City Impact include: grain elevators, a feed mill, assorted shops, a public library, and Meridian Rural Public High School. Other historic properties and resources include: historic farmsteads, irrigation facilities, the Ridenbaugh Canal, associated check dams, and more. These recorded locations likely represent only a sample of the actual number of historic buildings within the City of Meridian’s Area of City Impact. These special sites and historic resources are important to preserving Meridian’s heritage and in remembering the previous generations that laid the foundation for Meridian today. 2 Go to www.meridiancity/compplan “These special sites and historic resources are important to pre- serving Meridian’s heritage and in remem- bering the previous generations that laid the foundation for Meridian today.” 69City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 5.01.00 Preserve, protect, enhance, and wisely use our natural resources within the Area of City Impact.  5.01.01 Protect and conserve existing waterways, groundwater, wetlands, wildlife habitat, air, soils, and other natural resources. 5.01.01A Identify waterways, wetlands, and other natural resources for preservation.Medium Public Works 5.01.01B Identify wildlife habitat areas for conservation. Medium Public Works 5.01.01C Develop and implement programs to encourage and promote tree health and preservation throughout the City, including along waterways and within proposed development.On-going Parks 5.01.01D Limit canal tiling and piping of ditches, creeks, and drains where public safety issues are not of concern.On-going Public Works 5.01.01E Improve and protect creeks (Five Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile, Ten Mile, South Slough, and Jackson and Evans drainages) throughout commercial, industrial and residential areas.On-going Community Development 5.01.01F Identify underdeveloped areas for potential development.High Community Development 5.01.01G Coordinate open space conservation with land trust.Low Parks 5.01.01H Preserve, protect and provide open space for recreation, conservation, aesthetics, etc. On-going Parks 5.01.01I Support a long-term transportation system that conforms to the public health standard for carbon monoxide attainment. On-going Community Development 5.01.02 Preserve and protect viable farm ground and agricultural resources. 5.01.02A Encourage efficient use of farm ground and open space at Area of City Impact boundaries to effectively transition from rural uses to urban uses.On-going Community Development 5.01.02B Encourage infill development in vacant/underdeveloped areas within the City over fringe area development to halt the outward progression of urban development.On-going Community Development 5.02.00 Enhance Meridian's historical, cultural and agricultural heritage. 5.02.01 Support restoration of Old Town to enhance its historical quality. 5.02.01A Develop incentives for the preservation and restoration of historic and architecturally significant buildings.Medium Community Development 5.02.01B Implement design/building standards for historically significant buildings and resources in Old Town.Medium Community Development Chapter 5 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items 70City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 5.02.01C Actively support owners of historic buildings in their efforts to restore and/or preserve their properties. Pursue grant funding sources to leverage private resources for restoration and preservation projects.On-going Community Development 5.02.01D Coordinate with the Historic Preservation Commission to review and comment on all development applications in Old Town and provide a certificate of acceptability.Highest Community Development 5.02.02 Preserve and enhance historic and cultural resources. 5.02.02A Coordinate with the Meridian Historic Preservation Commission to recommend restoration of historical buildings.Highest Community Development 5.02.02B Investigate tax incentive programs for historic properties.Low Community Development 5.02.02C Appoint members to and consistently maintain the minimum required membership on the Meridian Historic Preservation Commission to fulfill the requirements of City Ordinance No. 471 and the requirements of the Certified Local Government Program.On-going Mayor's Office 5.02.02D Undertake programs that will increase the community's awareness of its heritage and the economic as well as aesthetic value of historic preservation.On-going Council 5.02.02E Conduct activities directed toward stimulating private and public investment in the restoration and preservation of historic buildings, outdoor spaces, and natural historic features.On-going Council 5.02.02F Support the efforts of the Historic Preservation Commission to foster preservation and conservation.On-going Council 5.02.02G When appropriate, direct all City departments and personnel to seek comments and approval from the Historic Preservation Commission prior to any changes to City-owned or controlled property (including buildings, outdoor spaces, and natural features).On-going Council 5.02.02H Place informational plaque on historic structures and special sites.Highest Finance 5.02.02I Seek funding services for grants to promote historic preservation.On-going Finance 5.02.02J Use the State Historic Preservation Office as a resource.On-going All 5.02.02K When appropriate, nominate eligible properties to the National Register of Historic Places.On-going Mayor's Office 5.02.02L Provide funding to the Historic Preservation Commission through the City's annual budget.On-going Council 5.02.02M Establish and maintain a system to survey and identify cultural and historical resources within City limits and maintain a local inventory of all identified sites, buildings and resources.Medium H.P.C. 5.02.02N Develop City code to preserve and protect historic and culturally significant structures and sites.Lowest Community Development 71City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 5.02.02O Encourage the rehabilitation and restoration of existing historic structures. On-going Community Development 5.02.02P Adopt a process to review proposed development to determine if it will destroy or adversely impact unique geological, historical or archeological sites. Low Community Development 5.02.02Q Encourage events and activities that celebrate the cultural heritage of Meridian.On-going Mayor's Office 5.03.00 Improve air quality and reduce air pollution in the Meridian and Treasure Valley airshed. 5.03.01 Protect public health by reducing ozone, fine particulate matter and other green house gases and toxics in the air. 5.03.01A Implement the City's Pathways Master Plan.On-going Parks 5.03.01B Coordinate with ACHD to improve traffic flow, minimize vehicle time spent idling and accelerating, and reduce the number of single-occupancy vehicles.On-going Community Development 5.03.01C Promote transportation choices, facilities, and alternatives such as car and van pooling, bicycle racks/storage and telecommunicating.On-going Community Development 5.03.01D Partner with transportation agencies and large employers to promote public awareness of air quality concerns and the need/benefits of alternative transportation choices, such as car and van pooling.On-going Community Development 5.03.01E Enforce City policy discouraging unnecessary idling for city fleet vehicles.On-going Police 5.03.01F Research utilization/installation of Energy Management Systems in municipal buildings to track and cut energy costs for lighting and heating/cooling.On-going Public Works 5.03.01G Pursue Idaho Power’s “Flex Peak” program in both municipal; and large commercial/industrial facilities.Low Public Works 5.03.01H Convert appropriate municipal fleet vehicles to low-emission/alternative fuel vehicles when feasible.Medium Public Works 5.03.01I [Removed]NA NA 5.03.01J Adopt a Dust Abatement Ordinance in conformance with the prototype developed by COMPASS for governments in the Treasure Valley.Low Community Development 5.03.01K Participate with Ada County in publicizing burning bans when necessary.On-going Council 5.04.00 Reduce energy consumption in municipal facilities and operations; provide leadership in promoting energy conservation in the City. 5.04.01 Provide City services in an environmentally sustainable and cost effective manner. 72City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 5.04.01A Implement the action items in the City’s “Energy Efficiency & Conservation Strategy” (May, 2010) in order to reduce energy costs at municipal facilities.On-going Public Works 5.04.01B Review the “Energy Efficiency & Conservation Strategy” at regular intervals to assess status of projects and programs and to make adjustments in response to changing conditions and technologies.On-going Public Works 5.04.01C Obtain and utilize monitoring software to analyze energy consumption in City facilities.Lowest Public Works 5.04.01D Establish a dedicated, revolving fund based on energy savings to finance conservation programs and projects in municipal operations.Low Public Works 5.04.01E Pursue City Energy Analyst position as identified in the “Energy Efficiency & Conservation Strategy”.Lowest Public Works 5.04.01F Research and compile successfully-implemented, incentive-based energy conservation strategies for use in both residential and commercial settings, from other municipalities.Low Community Development 5.04.02 Promote energy conservation. 5.04.02A Develop an outreach display/informational kiosk to provide public information on energy conservation. Partner with other entities to provide outreach in other locations such as schools and other public places.On-going Public Works 5.04.02B Review and analyze City codes related to lighting standards to insure appropriate levels of outdoor lighting in both public and private installations; to assure the “the right light for the right use” is installed.On-going Public Works 5.04.02C Encourage the installation of alternative energy (wind, solar and geothermal) in public and private facilities.On-going Council 5.04.02D Seek opportunities for public-private partnerships to develop alternative electricity generating facilities.Lowest Public Works 5.05.00 Maximize diversion of the municipal waste stream from disposal to recycling and reduce the amount of solid waste generated in the City. 5.05.01 Develop and support markets for recycled materials and products. 5.05.01A Investigate opportunities with other jurisdictions and private refuse contractors for waste reduction and recycling "messaging".On-going Public Works 5.05.01B Establish solid waste fees that encourage waste reduction and recycling ("pay as you throw").On-going Council 5.05.01C Develop, and implement public education and outreach activities to raise awareness on waste reduction, reuse, recycling, and toxic reduction.On-going Public Works 5.05.02 Establish recycling/diversion and hazardous waste disposal goals. 73City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 5.05.02A Assure that opportunities are available for proper disposal of target priority waste streams such as mercury, used oil, fluorescent lamps, used gas, and waste tires.On-going Public Works 5.05.02B Work with local stakeholders to develop public education campaigns regarding the importance of and opportunities for the proper disposal of hazardous waste.On-going Public Works 5.05.03 Enhance existing City recycling and procurement policies. 5.05.03A Partner with City's waste contractor on developing and implementing composting program.Medium Public Works 5.05.03B Procure specific recycled content and less toxic materials (internal recycling/sustainability programs).On-going Public Works 5.06.00 Promote the design, construction and operation of buildings that are environmentally sustainable and healthy places to live, work and learn. 5.06.01 Optimize green building strategies in municipal buildings, both existing and new construction.  5.06.01A Work with developers, builders, educational institutions and local public utilities to research and integrate new and emerging green building technologies.On-going All 5.06.01B Evaluate using LEED Green Building standards and other adopted development and construction standards with understood and accepted tools and performance criteria (e.g., ANSI/ASHRAE/ IES Standard 90.1-2007, Energy Standard for Buildings) in municipal facility/building construction projects. Medium All 5.06.01C Work towards Energy Star rating for municipal buildings and facilities where applicable.On-going All 5.06.01D Incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) technologies on City financed construction projects, where appropriate and feasible.Medium Council 5.06.01E Promote projects that demonstrate the effectiveness of managing runoff, reducing construction and maintenance costs, and enhancing communities via adoption of LID approaches, strategies and technologies by collaborating with developers.Medium Community Development 5.06.02 Strive to optimize energy efficiency in both residential and commercial construction (existing housing stock and new.) 5.06.02A Partner with regional stakeholders to increase public awareness of the benefits of sustainable design and constructing high-performance built environments.On-going All 5.06.02B Create demonstration projects incorporating water and energy conservation; and energy efficient construction methods and materials.On-going Public Works 5.06.02C [Removed]NA NA 74City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 5.06.02D Take advantage of new technologies and advancements in building science in order to promote whole-building approach to sustainability by recognizing performance in five key areas of human and environmental health: sustainable site development, water savings, energy efficiency, materials selection and indoor environmental quality. On-going All 5.06.02E Explore funding opportunities to retrofit a Meridian public building to improve energy efficiency.On-going All 5.06.02F Develop cooperative relationships with Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, Energy Policy Institute, University of Idaho Design Institute and Idaho Energy Collaborative in order to leverage resources and opportunities for projects and public education, outreach events and initiatives.On-going Public Works 5.06.02G Capitalize on the opportunity to showcase alternative energy resources at city facilities, parks, and buildings where applicable (wind turbines, solar panels, etc.)On-going Council 5.06.02H [Removed]NA NA 5.06.02I Identify funding sources and appropriate partners to stimulate energy efficient retrofits in existing housing stock.Low Community Development 5.06.02J Review ordinances, code, and conditional use permits to ensure there are no stumbling blocks to implementing green building, energy efficient strategies and incentives.Medium Community Development 5.06.02K [Removed]NA NA 5.07.00 Efficiently treat wastewater for current and future users by focusing on financial stewardship and environmental sustainability. 5.07.01 Protect public health and watersheds through adequate treatment and disposal of wastewater. 5.07.01A Anticipate future needs by adopting and implementing the Public Works Department's revised Sewer Master Plan and Wastewater Facility Plan.On-going Public Works 5.07.02 Provide cost effective and environmentally sustainable wastewater service to citizens and business. 5.07.02A Implement the recycled wastewater master plan.On-going Public Works 5.07.02B [Removed]NA NA 5.07.02C Eliminate existing inadequate private treatment systems in the City and discourage their use within future City limits.On-going Public Works 5.07.03 Expand the use of recycled water throughout the City. 5.07.03A Utilize "closed-loop" systems to reuse or recycle the waste stream.On-going Public Works 5.07.03B Explore alternative, sustainable energy sources including co-generation of power from waste processing byproducts.On-going Public Works 75City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 5.08.00 Provide ample and clean water to the citizens of Meridian in perpetuity. 5.08.01 Protect the quality of source water. 5.08.01A Ensure that new development is connected to the City's sanitary sewer system (no septic systems).On-going Community Development 5.08.01B Develop a source water protection plan.On-going Public Works 5.08.01C Coordinate with Idaho Department of Water Resources on reducing the proliferation of private wells in the Area of City Impact.On-going Public Works 5.08.02 Provide water in a cost effective manner. 5.08.02A Develop and implement a water supply master plan.On-going Public Works 5.08.02B Assess and provide new water sources.On-going Public Works 5.08.03 Conserve existing water supplies. 5.08.03A Implement the Public Works Department Water Conservation Plan.On-going Public Works 5.08.03B Reduce reliance on City water (potable) for irrigation through use of recycled water, public education and adoption of water conserving landscape guidelines.On-going Public Works 5.08.03C Initiate a public outreach program on water conservation.On-going Public Works 5.08.03D Encourage landscaping implementing the appropriate and attractive use of xeric, drought- tolerant plant species and non-plant materials to reduce maintenance and water consumption. On-going Community Development 5.09.00 Protect Meridian's surface water quality. 5.09.01 Establish and implement a Comprehensive Surface Water Protection program. 5.09.01A Develop framework and components of a comprehensive surface water protection program including Storm Water protection, Floodplain Management and stream and riparian protection and restoration in order to satisfy the City's requirements under the Clean Water Act, FEMA, and the National Flood insurance program. On-going Public Works 5.09.01B Identify waterways, wetlands, and other natural resources for preservation.Medium Public Works 5.09.01C Implement policies that limit canal tiling and piping of creeks, drains where public safety issues are not of concern.On-going Community Development 5.09.01D Provide incentives for developers to grant conservation easements along creek-side corridors.Medium Community Development 76City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 5Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 5.09.01E Incorporate creek corridors as an amenity in development design.On-going Community Development 5.09.01F Identify and implement Low Impact Development (LID) in storm water drainage systems that are administered by the City of Meridian.Medium Community Development 5.09.01G Develop and cultivate partnerships with local and regional stakeholders on public education campaigns for water conservation and water quality.On-going Public Works 5.09.01H Work to eliminate older, inefficient septic and private treatment plants; connect users to City wastewater system.On-going Public Works City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 6 77 Chapter Chapter 6 – Public Services Community, Social and Government Services This chapter discusses community, social and government services provided in Meridian. As part of this chapter, schools, parks and recreation, emergency services, libraries, arts and entertainment, as well as general government and private property rights are described. Some other services, like sewer, water, and transportation, are addressed in other parts of this Plan and are not duplicated here. Education For Meridian to encourage and attract new business, to foster an environment which generates new ideas, and to mold a diverse and sustainable economy, we must continue to encourage and support educational opportunities which create an employment base attractive to employers. It is important for Meridian residents to have accessible educational opportunities, K-12 and beyond, which prepare them for rewarding local career opportunities. Public Schools Public school facilities in the City of Meridian are part of the West Ada School District, which serves an area larger than the City of Meridian and its Area of City Impact. The District covers 384 square miles and serves the cities of Meridian, Star, Eagle, western and south-western portions of Boise, part of Garden City, and the unincorporated areas of Ada County that lie between these municipalities. In total, there are 31 elementary schools, 9 middle schools, 5 comprehensive high schools, 2 alternative high schools, 1 charter high school, and 1 magnet high school throughout the West Ada School District. Enrollment growth has placed tremendous demands on schools in recent past. Since 2000, the District has opened eight elementary schools, three middle schools, one alternative middle school, two high schools, and one alternative high school. In the past ten years, West Ada School District has opened schools at a faster pace than any district in the history of the state of Idaho. With an additional 1,000 students per year projected to move into the District, this rate of new school construction is expected to continue into the foreseeable future. Land acquisition for future school sites within West Ada School District are based upon the following acreage standards: • Elementary Schools 10 to 12 acres • Middle Schools 40 acres • High Schools 55 acres Chapter 78 6 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Based on past trends, West Ada School District estimates that approximately 1,000 acres of land will be needed within the City of Meridian’s Area of City Impact to meet the needs of all existing and projected K-12 students. As shown on the Future Land Use Map, about one elementary school is projected within each square mile of the City. Depending upon the residential density of an area and other build-out factors, the District estimates that it will need at least one middle school for every two to two and a half square miles and one high school for every three square miles of fully developed land. To assist the District, the City of Meridian seeks to continue its support through joint long range and site planning, continued exploration into multi-use and shared facilities, and providing increased safety through efficient use of multi-modal transportation corridors servicing schools. The City will continue to support school sites within every square mile, encourage communication between essential service providers to plan for and accommodate growth associated with schools, and further explore opportunities to cut operating costs through joint land use agreements. Thoughtful communication and coordination will help to ensure residents in the City of Meridian have close, safe, and applicable educational opportunities. Continuing Education In addition to Idaho State University–Meridian, other colleges and universities in the Meridian area include (main campus location in parenthesis): University of Phoenix (Meridian), George Fox University (Meridian), Guardian College (Meridian), Broadview University (Meridian), Boise State University (Boise), College of Western Idaho (Nampa), College of Idaho (Caldwell), Northwest Nazarene University (Nampa), University of Idaho Extension (Boise), Stevens- Henager College (Boise), Carrington College (Boise), Brown Mackie College (Boise), and Treasure Valley Community College (Ontario, OR). Emergency Services Police Despite the tremendous growth Meridian has experienced over the last decade, the City has not been subject an increased crime rate. In fact, the rate of criminal offenses in Meridian has remained lower than the national and state averages for several years. Review of officer to population ratio and response times suggests that with the more recent addition of officers, detectives, school resource officers, neighborhood contact officers, support staff and the advancements of the administration, the Meridian Police Departments is maintaining a respectable crime rate as well as an impressive clearance rate at approximately 45.5% in 2009. Going forward, continued coordination with the Police Department is vital to ensure adequate services are available for proposed annexation and development requests. Making best use of the Police Departments obvious expertise in matters of safety is also important in the planning and design of new facilities, services, and contingency/hazard response plans. “Thoughtful commu- nication and coordina- tion will help to ensure residents in the City of Meridian have close, safe, and applicable educational opportuni- ties.” City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 6 79 Chapter The Police Department also houses the City’s code enforcement team. These individuals are primarily responsible for ensuring that City Code violations in the City are identified and quickly corrected. Lastly, continued participation by the Police Department in local events and special programs, such as the Police Athletic league (PAL) will remain a key element of their success by promoting a safe community, serving as proactive crime deterrents through good example, and fostering the respect of the community. Fire and Ambulance The Meridian Fire Department has quickly transformed from a primarily all- volunteer department into a combination department with 57 full-time firefighters and 20 part-time, on-call personnel. Currently, the Meridian Fire Department consists of five Fire Stations strategically located throughout the Meridian area, with plans for a total of 11 at full build out of the Meridian Area of City Impact. Services provided by the department include: fire, rescue, hazardous materials, fire prevention education, plans review, inspections and advanced life-support emergency medical service. The Meridian Fire Department will continue to be an important asset in development and land use decisions, as they ensure that there is adequate fire flow, access and compliance with the Fire Code. Parks and Recreation The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is the primary recreation service provider for Meridian. Quality parks, recreation facilities, activities and programs are considered by most Meridian residents to be vital in promoting overall quality of life. The Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for maintaining public open spaces and providing a quality system of parks and recreation facilities and positive leisure opportunities available to all persons in the community. The Department is also responsible for the development and maintenance of the pathways system and urban forest. Parks and Recreation also offers a variety of recreational programs, adult sports leagues, special events, and handles shelter/field reservations and temporary use permits. Meridian parks and recreation facilities and recreational programs provide residents with safe outlets for entertainment, exercise, social activities, and learning opportunities. Continued provision of high quality, year-round park and recreation facilities and activities requires the acquisition and development of land, funding for maintenance and renovations, and programming of elements and use activities. Developing new parks and expanding the existing park system with cutting-edge features like multi sensory games, ice skating rinks, dog parks, and year-round programs is vital to keep up with demand from growth. The City also seeks to continue expanding its pathway system by coordinating new projects with regional partners, and providing safe, tightly integrated pathways linking popular destinations such as schools and parks to neighborhood centers. Therefore, the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Pathways Master Plan should be used when evaluating proposed development for consistency with the City’s plans. “Further, parks and open space help to regulate air quality and climate, counter the warming effects of paved surfaces, recharge groundwater and protect lakes and streams from polluted runoff.” Chapter 80 6 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Arts and Entertainment Meridian envisions a vibrant arts and entertainment scene that integrates the arts experience into everyday life and enhances the spirit of the City. As part of its commitment to raising awareness of existing opportunities and providing new offerings to experience art, the City created the Meridian Arts Commission (MAC) in 2006. MAC wants to ensure continued access to a variety of offerings for all residents, regardless of age, race, or ability. In addition to supporting the arts, the City seeks to continue its encouragement of Community Events. Programs such as the Dairy Days Festival, Chili Cook-Off, Firefighter’s Salmon BBQ, Free Family Fishing Day, the Meridian Symphony Orchestra, and others are vital to community well being. The continued availability of a variety of social opportunities is essential in promoting community for all residents. Other opportunities to support new facilities for community enrichment, education, and outreach should be explored. Libraries The Meridian Library District operates two locations, one on Cherry Lane and the other in the Silverstone Business Campus, is free to all residents and provides a variety of services in support of the community. The mission of the Meridian Library District is to provide a safe and inviting place where residents can interact with each other; find information about their community and its offerings; investigate a wide range of topics pertaining to their work, school and personal lives; and develop a love of reading and learning that will continue throughout their lives. Even with the increasing demand and popularity of digitally based media, libraries continue to provide a service to the traditional book readers, the young, those needing a little extra help, and others, as a safe place to socialize, share and learn. Organizational Excellence City Hall Meridian City Hall, located in downtown, serves as the hub of Meridian’s municipal government. City Hall currently houses ten City departments, serving as a convenient “one-stop-shop” for citizens seeking services, including: Clerk’s Office, Parks and Recreation, Fire Department Administration, Building Services, Planning, Finance/Billing, Purchasing, Human Resources, City Attorney’s Office, Information Technology, and the Mayor’s Office. City Hall is a community-centric building that also features an art gallery, the Meridian Historical Society, and community meeting spaces. Meridian uses the Mayor-Council form of local government. The job of the City Council, which includes the Mayor, is to adopt codes that govern the City in addition to applicable state and federal laws, create an annual budget, and oversee all of the City’s fiscal matters. The City of Meridian promotes citizen involvement in government by inviting residents to serve on a variety of boards, commissions, and committees designed to assist City leaders in information gathering and “Life is the only art that we are required to practice without preparation, and with- out being allowed the preliminary trials, the failures and botches, that are essential for training.” -Lewis Mumford City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 6 81 Chapter deliberative processes. Some of the volunteer boards and commission in Meridian are: Parks & Recreation Commission, Planning & Zoning Commission, Meridian Arts Commission, Historical Preservation Commission, Transportation Commission, Impact Fee Advisory Committee, Solid Waste Advisory Commission and the Mayor’s Youth Advisory Council. City staff is committed to providing the best customer service to the community we serve, and responds to customers in a genuine, positive, and timely manner. Interactions are solution-oriented, where staff meets and exceeds expectations by listening to customers and following through on their concerns. Staff members understand each individual’s role in the organizational team, know their jobs, and accept that each person is responsible for their own work, choices, and actions. Staff members are trustworthy and courteous and show honor and accept people with diverse opinions and backgrounds. Staff performs professionally beyond the parameters of the job while being creative, innovative, flexible and adaptable to community needs. In short, City Staff provides our best for the community we serve. We provide quality service to our customers and positive development of our staff that promotes and expects accountability, respect and excellence. One of the ways the City is improving upon service is by investing in enterprise solution software that will integrate the services and data collection of the building division, development services division, planning department, clerk’s office, and code enforcement. This system will also have the ability to “talk” to our geographic information system, billing software, and water and sewer utility information database. By having information in a shared database, staff will be able to process permits, development applications, and licenses more efficiently and effectively and provide more accurate and timely responses to customer queries. Community Development Block Grant The City of Meridian became an Entitlement Community as designated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in the fall of 2006. With the Entitlement Community designation, the City receives money annually through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The CDBG Program seeks to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment, and by expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons. The City Council, with input from the public, establishes the overall direction of the CDBG Program in the Consolidated Plan, which identifies high-level goals and objectives for the five year interval covered by the Plan. Activities the City will undertake each year are detailed in annual action plans, which the City prepares and submits to HUD. Providing decent housing for low- and moderate-income persons is one of the primary goals of the CDBG Program, and HUD has a strong commitment to “Staff performs pro- fessionally beyond the parameters of the job while being creative, innovative, flexible and adaptable to community needs.” Chapter 82 6 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan affirmatively further fair housing. The City of Meridian, as a recipient of the CDBG federal funds, and its partnering non-profits, are obligated to not discriminate in housing or services directly or indirectly on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, familial status, or disability. In 2011, the City will update its Consolidated Plan for the next five years. Community input is an important component of each Consolidated Plan update, and the City works with individuals and local non-profit agencies to help determine the most critical needs within the community and determine how best to address those needs. As part of the updated Consolidated Plan process, the City will undergo an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. This review will determine any areas where the City can strengthen its anti-discrimination policies and practices to insure that all persons and households have access to decent housing options. Property Rights The City of Meridian wholly respects the rights of its citizens and their property, and is abjectly against the negligence, abuse or devaluing of private property by others. By encouraging property maintenance, preventing and mitigating incompatible land use, and ensuring local, state, and federal code compliance, residents should feel their private property rights are respected and secure. The City will continue to review its policy for compliance with the State regulatory takings guidelines, and ensure that its staff is appropriately trained in applicable code related to property rights. For a comprehensive review of property rights and regulatory takings analysis, which the City will use to review policy and code against for compliance with private property rights, please see Appendix C. “The City of Meridi- an wholly respects the rights of its citizens and their property, and is abjectly against the negligence, abuse or devaluing of pri- vate property by oth- ers.” 83City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 6Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 6.01.00 Provide a broad range of parks, programs, and recreational facilities that meet a variety of needs and uses and that are located geographically throughout Meridian and available to everyone. 6.01.01 Provide for park acquisition and maintenance to meet projected demands. 6.01.01A Require open space areas within all development.On-going Community Development 6.01.01B Update and maintain existing parks and recreation facilities to meet all regulatory, safety, and quality standards.On-going Parks 6.01.01C Support funding of Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Plan projects and programs.On-going Council 6.01.01D Annually review, update and implement the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System plan.High Parks 6.01.01E Identify and require future park sites using information in the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System and on the Future Land Use Map.On-going Parks 6.01.01F Consider population/housing density when acquiring future land for parks and recreation.On-going Parks 6.01.02 Throughout the City, develop all park and recreation land to provide diversity of uses and activities. 6.01.02A Identify and provide for the recreation needs of all citizens.On-going Parks 6.01.02B Review possible sites within City for developing an indoor multiple-use facility.Medium Parks 6.01.02C Develop pathways to connect Meridian with Boise, Nampa, Kuna, and Eagle.Medium Parks 6.01.02D Develop indoor/outdoor multiple-use facilities (i.e., recreation center, fairgrounds, etc.) for a variety of recreational, educational, cultural, and sports purposes and uses.Low Parks 6.01.02E Create parks that encourage year-round use and multi-sensory play.On-going Parks 6.01.02F Provide a variety of park types (neighborhood parks, community parks, regional parks) interspersed throughout the community.On-going Parks 6.02.00 Ensure that adequate public services are provided for existing and future residents and businesses. 6.02.01 Plan and expand services as part of the development process. Chapter 6 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items 84City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 6Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 6.02.01A Implement the City's Pathways Master Plan to provide a bike and pathways system between neighborhoods, local collectors, and community destinations. Work with new development, ITD, ACHD, COMPASS, Ada County, and other entities to identify partnership opportunities.On-going Community Development 6.02.01B Require that development projects have planned for the provision of all public services.On-going Council 6.02.01C Require adequate fees from new development to fund expansion of services.On-going Council 6.02.02 Cooperate with other agencies and service providers around the Valley. 6.02.02A Support joint use agreements with the West Ada School District, Western Ada Recreation District, ACHD, irrigation districts, and other private and non-profit entities.On-going Council 6.02.02B Communicate with essential service providers and local decision-makers to coordinate planning efforts and direction of growth. Service providers include but are not limited to: All City Departments, ITD, ACHD, COMPASS, VRT, Irrigation Districts, Western Ada Recreation District, Ada County, St. Luke's Hospital, St. Alphonsus Hospital, West Ada School District, Meridian Library District, Idaho Power, Century Link, Intermountain Gas, Solid Waste, Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Department of Environmental Quality, Central District Health Department, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Highest Council 6.02.02C Coordinate with irrigation districts to implement the proposed pathway network along irrigation canals, ditches, creeks, and easements.On-going Parks 6.02.02D Schedule regular meetings with City and County planning staff to discuss projects and joint planning efforts.High Community Development 6.02.02E Participate in transportation planning efforts.On-going Community Development 6.02.02F Coordinate the City's Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) with ACHD's projects.On-going Public Works 6.02.02G Address the Area of City Impact boundary with Ada County and the Cities of Eagle, Boise, Star, and Kuna.Highest Community Development 6.02.02H Coordinate with transportation agencies to ensure provision of services and transit development.On-going Community Development 6.02.02I Coordinate with the City of Nampa and Canyon County on land use, transportation and emergency services issues.On-going Community Development 6.02.02J Coordinate with appropriate agencies on master planning and long-range planning efforts.On-going Community Development 6.02.02K Ensure that other City departments, area agencies and service providers are informed about and have an opportunity to participate in the City's development review process. On-going Community Development 6.03.00 Allow all Meridian residents and visitors an opportunity to experience public art. 85City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 6Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 6.03.01 Provide art in public places.  6.03.01A Provide both permanent and rotating works of art in City Hall and other public places.On-going Finance 6.03.01B Encourage public art be integrated as a component of community development. On-going Community Development 6.03.01C Utilize percent for art ordinance funding to raise awareness and appreciation of the arts.Medium Finance 6.03.01D Establish an Art and Cultural District High Community Development 6.03.01E Provide local artists opportunities to showcase their work.On-going Finance 6.03.01F Find a way to fund a civic center - home for the arts. Medium Council 6.04.00 Provide hands-on experiences in the fine arts, regardless of age, race, ability, or other protected class. 6.04.01 Provide a diversity of education and art experiences for all residents. 6.04.01A Develop and offer youth art opportunities at and after school. On-going Finance 6.04.01B Provide arts education for adults and seniors, and partner with other community organizations to support and encourage arts programs.On-going Finance 6.04.01C Present a variety of performing arts locally. On-going Finance 6.04.01D Sponsor performing arts in partnership with community organizations.On-going Council 6.04.01E Raise awareness and promote existing arts offerings and artwork within the community.On-going Finance 6.05.00 Protect public health and safety by guiding growth and development away from hazardous areas that pose a threat to people and property. 6.05.01 Reduce the threat of loss of life and property from hazards. 6.05.01A Plan and allow land uses surrounding Waste Water Treatment Plant to reduce human exposure to odors.On-going Community Development 6.05.01B Require industrial uses to conform to disposal, spill and storage measures as outlined by the EPA.On-going Public Works 6.05.01C Discourage residential areas in close proximity to Wastewater Treatment Plant.On-going Community Development 86City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 6Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 6.05.01D Work with ITD and ACHD to ensure highways and roadways are as safe as possible.On-going Community Development 6.05.01E Maintain a Critical Task Analysis plan for Fire and Police responses within the jurisdiction.High Police / Fire 6.05.01F Work with Idaho Power to ensure that a National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor does not traverse through Meridian.On-going Community Development 6.05.01G Locate areas below canals and laterals that could be damaged if the slope is compromised. On-going Public Works 6.05.01H Allocate resources to define, locate, map, and establish response plans for target hazards within the jurisdiction.High Fire 6.05.01I Allocate resources to develop and implement Community Risk Reduction programs.High Fire 6.06.00 Ensure that all planning decisions and ordinance implementation balances the interests of the community with the protection of private property rights for owners today and future generations. 6.06.01 Enact land use ordinances, policies, fees and make decisions, including land use restrictions and conditions of approval, that do not violate private property rights. 6.06.01A Conduct regular training with City staff to ensure that they properly adhere to and apply provisions of Idaho Code §67-8003 in land use planning and development review processes.On-going Legal 6.06.01B Review policies, the Unified Development Code, and other regulations for consistency with Idaho Code. High Community Development 6.06.01C Encourage property owners to preserve and maintain their property for use of future generations. On-going Council 6.06.01D Preserve private property rights and values by enforcing regulations that will prevent and mitigate against incompatible and detrimental neighboring uses.On-going Council City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 7 87 Chapter Chapter 7 – Implementation When it comes to implementing the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, the primary responsibility lies with City Staff. As discussed in Chapter 1, however, citizens, developers, the Planning and Zoning Commission, as well as the City Council and other groups and commissions, are all involved and also responsible for shaping community development and the overall pattern of growth within the community. Making the Plan Reality Alignment with Other Plans and Resources One of the key ways that the Comprehensive Plan becomes an improved tool for growth is to align it with other established plans and goals for the City. The specific plans and documents that are adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan include: the Existing Conditions Report, the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan, the City of Meridian Strategic Plan, the Architectural Standards Manual, the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Plan, the Meridian Pathways Master Plan, Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan, Destination Downtown, Communities in Motion, ACHD’s Roadways to Bikeways Bicycle Master Plan, and the Master Street Map, Complete Streets Policy, the Livable Street Design Guide from ACHD’s Transportation and Land Use Integration Plan (TLIP), and the Ada County Emergency Plans and Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan. The City hereby adopts as addenda to the Comprehensive Plan the versions of these documents in effect at the time the Comprehensive Plan is approved by the City Council, and as amended. The Comprehensive Plan has a symbiotic relationship with and works in concert with City Code, the City’s Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Plan, the City’s Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy, the City’s Sewer and Water Master Plans, other department master plans, capital improvement plans, and various transportation plans and studies. It is also used in conjunction with each City department’s strategic plan, action plan, and annual employee performance appraisal. All City departments should use the Comprehensive Plan as a tool for setting work plans, budgets, capital improvements, and allocating other resources for City Council approval. City staff from all departments will regularly discuss and coordinate the needs of the City. Staff will work together with the common goal of guiding growth, providing City services within available resources, being organized and efficient, and being good stewards of the public trust. “Implementation of the Plan will take hard work and dedi- cation from the entire community.” Chapter 88 7 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Next Steps After adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, one of the first steps will be to prioritize the action items listed in the Plan. City Departments and other stakeholders will be part of the process to determine which action items are immediate, intermediate or long-term priorities. This consolidated list of the action items will be referred to as the Implementation Plan of the Comprehensive Plan and it will establish both an action item lead and support, including all City departments or civic organizations that need to be involved in completing each action. After staff consensus on priorities, the draft Implementation Plan will be shared with the Mayor and Council. By assigning both responsibility, and priority, the intent is to provide for the timely execution of the various components of the Plan. On a regular basis, City staff will report back to the Council on progress being made in completing action items. It is also anticipated that additional action items may be added and an update to both the text of the Comprehensive Plan and the Existing Conditions Report will occur on a semi-annual basis, and/or as otherwise needed. Implementation of the Plan will take hard work and dedication from the entire community. Hopefully, everyone finds the organization of this document to be user-friendly and the goals, objectives and action items representative of the community’s vision. 89City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 7Chapter I.D.GOALS / OBJECTIVES / ACTION ITEMS ELEMENT PRIORITY RESPONSIBLE LEAD 7.01.00 Shape the future of the City by providing citizens and City leaders with a Comprehensive Plan Vision and City ordinances that execute that vision 7.01.01 Advance, support, and promote development of planning and economic development tools. 7.01.01A Keep current the Unified Development Code and Future Land Use Map to implement the provisions of this plan.On-going Community Development 7.01.01B Support the Economic Excellence team.On-going Council 7.01.01C Maintain, update and find better ways to use Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in everyday City business and project-specific purposes.On-going All 7.01.01D Engage the public in land use planning processes by using a variety of methods to inform and solicit comments.On-going Community Development 7.01.01E Update the Unified Development Code to establish incentives and regulations for small-scale or specialized agricultural operations in certain parts of the City. High Community Development 7.01.01F Integrate land use and transportation planning to ensure that they mutually support the communities' goals and desires.On-going Community Development 7.01.01G Review the status of the Comprehensive Plan implementation plan to ensure steady progress.On-going Community Development 7.01.01H Require that the Planning and Zoning Commission duties include detailed review of the adopted Comprehensive Plan at least once a year and that decisions explicitly reflect support and advance of the Plan as the primary factor of approval.On-going Community Development 7.01.01I Require that public meetings be held regularly to review the Comprehensive Plan and to promote a better understanding of the plan and its purpose.On-going Community Development 7.01.01J Conduct work sessions with area cities and counties as needed to better coordinate planning policies regionally.On-going Community Development 7.01.01K Organize and fund committees or special commissions consistent with the provisions of this plan.On-going Council 7.01.01L Require that the Unified Development Code and all other City and County ordinances are enforced.On-going Council 7.01.01M Educate the public and advisory boards so that they understand the Comprehensive Plan's legal elements and intent.On-going Legal Chapter 7 – Goals, Objectives, & Action Items 90City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 7Chapter ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ A A-1 Appendix City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Glossary Terms Affordable Housing – Housing with rents or mortgage costs that are 30% or less of the gross monthly income of a household at 80% or below the Boise Metropolitan Statistical Area median income. Area of City Impact – Also known as the City’s planning area. It is the land area surrounding the limits of each City, negotiated between each individual City and the county in which it lies. Each City has comprehensive planning authority for its Area of City Impact, but until annexation occurs, zoning and development entitlement is handled by the county. Buffer – An area within a property or site, generally adjacent to and parallel with the property line, either consisting of existing natural vegetation or created by the use of trees, shrubs, berms and/or fences and designed to limit views and sounds from the development tract to adjacent parties and vice versa. Also commonly used when describing a transitional use, typically office, between residential and commercial or industrial. Building Code – Legislative regulations that prescribe the materials, requirements and methods to be used in the construction, rehabilitation, maintenance and repair of buildings. The City of Meridian, per state statue, has adopted the Uniform Building Code (UBC), developed by the International Conference of Building Officials. Capital Improvement Program – A process of identifying and budgeting for the public facilities that a jurisdiction will need to construct in order to serve existing and anticipated development. Capital improvement programming is typically done in five-year increments with annual updates. A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) must address the type of project, the location of the project, the cost of the project, the source of funds to finance the project, the agency or department responsible for the project, and the time frame for completion of the project. Capital Improvement Programs are a primary tool of most growth management programs. Compatible – Land uses capable of existing together without conflict or ill effects. Conditional Use – A utilization of land having characteristics such that it may be allowed in a particular zoning district only after review by the Commission and Council, and granting of approval imposing conditions deemed necessary to make the proposed use compatible with other uses in the area. Conditional Use Permit – Permit issued to allow a conditional use. Cross-Access Agreement – An agreement between adjacent property owners in which internal connections are provided between parking areas in order to improve traffic flow on the street by minimizing the number of access points needed. Cross-access agreements are typically obtained incrementally as a condition of approval for new development. The first one to develop will be Appendix A A-2 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan required to make an irrevocable offer of cross-access to the adjacent parcel and must design the parking lot to accommodate the access. When the adjacent owner wishes to develop, they will be conditioned to reciprocate with a similar cross-access agreement and complete the access. Density Bonus – Incentives given for dedication of land to the public for parks, schools, or other public facilities. Dry-line Sewer – The installation of a sewage collection system designed to be served by gravity flow into the City of Meridian municipal wastewater system, in accordance with current facilities plans, that is not initially operational because downstream sewers are not yet constructed. Fair Housing Act – Fair Housing Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, enacted to prohibit housing discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, handicap, sex, and/or familial status. Fire Flow – The minimum number of gallons per minute that are needed to fight a fire in a structure, for two continuous hours through fire plugs in the near proximity of the structure. Fire flow requirements are established by the national Uniform Fire Code and are a factor in the City’s Insurance Services Office (ISO) rating. Floodway – Drainage and irrigation channels and adjacent land areas that must be reserved to discharge flood waters from a 100-year flood. Development is prohibited in this area. Green Building – Also known as green construction or sustainable building, is the practice of creating structures and using processes that are environmentally responsible and resource-efficient throughout a building’s life-cycle: from siting to design, construction, operation, maintenance, renovation, and demolition. Hazardous Waste – Waste that poses substantial or potential threats to public health or the environment. There are four factors that determine whether or not a substance is hazardous: ignitability (i.e., flammable), reactivity, corrosiveness and toxicity Infill Development – Development on vacant parcels, or redevelopment of existing parcels to a higher and better use, that is surrounded by developed property within the City of Meridian. Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) – An internationally recognized green building certification system, providing third-party verification that a building or community was designed and built using strategies intended to improve performance in metrics such as energy savings, water efficiency, CO2 emissions reduction, improved indoor environmental quality, and stewardship of resources and sensitivity to their impacts. Low Impact Development (LID) – A term used in the United States to describe a land planning and engineering design approach to managing stormwater runoff. A A-3 Appendix City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan LID emphasizes conservation and use of on-site natural features to protect water quality. Neighborhood Center – A development area that includes a mix of uses and housing types, a central public gathering place, interconnecting streets and alleys, schools within walking distance, and services (office and retail) to serve the neighborhood. The basic goal is integration of the activities of potential residents with work, shopping, recreation and transit all within walking distance. Public Facilities and Services – See Urban Services. Reclaimed Water – Former wastewater (sewage) that has been treated to remove solids and certain impurities, and then used in sustainable landscaping irrigation or to recharge groundwater aquifers. This is done for sustainability and water conservation, rather than discharging the treated wastewater to surface waters such as rivers and oceans. Sometimes called recycled water. Strategic Plan – The strategic plan will serve as a roadmap for the City’s success over a period of five years. It will also serve as a tool to communicate the City’s intentions to the community, focus the direction of its financial resources and employees, and ensure that short-term goals and objectives are met in a timely fashion to ensure attainment of the City’s overall vision. Urban Service Planning Area – Priority planning area where City of Meridian sewer and water facilities and most other services and utilities are available or planned in officially adopted plans. Urban Services – Services provided by the City of Meridian or established jurisdictions within the City of Meridian, including City of Meridian water, fire protection by Meridian City-Rural Fire District, City of Meridian parks and recreation facilities, City of Meridian police protection, public sanitary sewers owned by the City of Meridian, public transit, schools, storm drainage facilities, and urban standard streets and roads. Walkable – Development that contains a comprehensive network of sidewalks and trails. Development tends to be compact, and diverse, providing varied and plentiful destinations for walking and cycling; destinations tend to be within ¼ of a mile from dwellings. Environment is safe and aesthetically pleasing, with open space interspersed throughout development. A-4 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ B B-1 Appendix City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Acronyms and Abbreviations ACHD Ada County Highway District AOCI Area of City Impact BGG Blueprint for Good Growth BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand CDBG Community Development Block Grant CDHD Central District Health Department CIM Communities in Motion COMPASS Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho CPRSP Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Plan DEQ Department of Environmental Quality DOT U.s. Department of Transportation EECS Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAM Future Acquisitions Map FHWA Federal Highway Administration FLUM Future Land Use Map GPM Gallons per Minute HUD Housing and Urban Development IDHW Idaho Department of Health and Welfare IPUC Idaho Public Utility Commission ISU Idaho State University ITD Idaho Transportation Department LEED Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design LID Local Improvement District MAC Meridian Arts Commission MADC Mayor's Anti-Drug Coalition MAYC Mayor's Youth Advisory Council MDC Meridian Development Corporation MGD Million Gallons per Day NC Neighborhood Center NMID Nampa Meridian Irrigation District NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System PAD Position Accountability Definition PAL Police Athletic League RUT Rural Urban Transition (Ada County zoning designation) SHPO State Historic Preservation Office SWAC Solid Waste Advisory Committee Appendix B B-2 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan TLIP Transportation and Land Use Integration Plan TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load TMISAP Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan TTF Transportation Task Force UDC Unified Development Code UPRR Union Pacific Railroad USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation USPA Urban Service Planning Area VRT Valley Regional Transit WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant C C-1 Appendix City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Regulatory Takings Checklist The City of Meridian wholly respects the rights of its citizens and their property, and is abjectly against the negligence, abuse or devaluing of private property by others. By encouraging property maintenance, preventing and mitigating incompatible land use, and ensuring local, state, and federal code compliance, residents should feel their private property rights are respected and secure. The City will continue to review its policy for compliance with the State regulatory takings guidelines, and ensure that its staff is appropriately trained in applicable code related to property rights. The following checklist is used in reviewing proposed regulations or actions to ensure compliance with private property rights. 1. Does the regulation or action result in a permanent or temporary physical occupation of private property? Regulation or action resulting in permanent or temporary occupation of all or a portion of private property will generally constitute a “taking.” For example, a regulation that required landlords to allow installation of cable television boxes in their apartments was found to constitute a “taking.” (See Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 [1982].) 2. Does the regulation or action require a property to dedicate a portion of property or to grant an easement? Carefully review all regulations requiring the dedication of property or grant of an easement. The dedication of property must be reasonably and specifically designed to represent or compensate for adverse impacts of the proposed development. Likewise, the magnitude of the burden placed on the proposed development should be reasonably related to the adverse impacts created by the development. A court will also consider whether the action in question substantially advances a legitimate state interest. For example, the United States Supreme Court determined in Nollan v. California Coastal Comm’n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) that compelling an owner of waterfront property to grant public easement across his property that does not substantially advance the public’s interest in beach access, constitutes a “taking.” Likewise, the United States Supreme Court held that compelling a property owner to leave a public green way, as opposed to a private one, did not substantially advance protection of a floodplain, and was a “taking.” (Dolan v. City of Tigard, 114 U.S. 2309 [June 24, 1994].) 3. Does the regulation deprive the owner of all economically viable uses of the property? If a regulation prohibits all economically viable or beneficial uses of the land, it will likely constitute a “taking.” In this situation, the agency can avoid liability for just compensation only if it can demonstrate that the proposed uses are prohibited by the laws of nuisance or other pre-existing limitations on the use of the property (See Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Coun., 112 S. Ct. 2886 [1992].) Appendix C C-2 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Unlike 1 and 2 above, it is important to analyze the regulation’s impact on the property as a whole, and not just the impact on a portion whether there is any profitable use of the remaining property available. (See Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United States, 18 F.3d 1560 [Fed. Cir. 1994]. The remaining use does not necessarily have to be the owner’s planned use, a prior use or the highest and best use of the property. One factor in this assessment is the degree to which the regulatory action interferes with a property owner’s reasonable investment backed expectations. Carefully review regulations requiring that all of a particular parcel of land be left substantially in its natural state. A prohibition of all economically viable users of the property is vulnerable to a takings challenge. In some situations, however, there may be pre-existing limitations on the use of property that could insulate the government from takings liability. 4. Does the regulation have a significant impact on the landowner’s economic interest? Carefully review regulations that have a significant impact on the owner’s economic interest. Courts will often compare the value of property before and after the impact of the challenged regulation. Although a reduction in property value alone may not be a “taking,” a severe reduction in the property value often indicates a reduction or elimination of reasonably profitable uses. Another economic factor courts will consider is the degree to which the challenged regulation impacts any developmental rights of the owner. As with 3, above, these economic factors are normally applied to the property owner as a whole. 5. Does the regulation deny a fundamental attribute of ownership? Regulations that deny the landowner a fundamental attribute of ownership-- including the right to possess, exclude other and dispose of all or a portion of the property—are potential takings. The United States Supreme Court recently held that requiring a public easement for recreational purposes where the harm to be prevented was to the flood plain was a “taking.” In finding this to be a “taking,” the Court stated: The City never demonstrated why a public green way, as opposed to a private one, was required in the interest of flood control. The difference to the petitioner, of course, is the loss of her ability to exclude others…[T]his right to exclude others is “one of the most essential sticks in the bundle of rights that are commonly characterized as property.” Dolan v. City of Tigard, 114 U.S. 2309 (June 24, 1994). The United States Supreme Court has also held that barring inheritance (an essential attribute of ownership) of certain interest in land held by individual members of an Indian tribe constituted a “taking.” Hodel v. Irving, 481 U.S. 704 (1987). C C-3 Appendix City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan 6. Does the regulation serve the same purpose that would be served by directly prohibiting the use or action; and does the condition imposed substantially advance that purpose? A regulation may go too far and may result in a takings claim where it does not substantially advance a legitimate governmental purpose. (Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 107 S. CT. 3141 [1987]; Dolan v. City of Tigard, 114 U.S. 2309 [June 24, 1994].) In Nollan, the United States Supreme Court held that it was an unconstitutional “taking” to condition the issuance of a permit to land owners on the grant of an easement to the public to use their beach. The court found that since there was not an indication that the Nollan’s house plans interfered in any way with the public’s ability to walk up and down the beach, there was no “nexus” between any public interest that might be harmed by the construction of the house, and the permit condition. Lacking this connection, the required easement was just as unconstitutional as it would be if imposed outside the permit context. Likewise, regulatory actions that closely resemble, or have effects of a physical invasion or occupation or property, are more likely to be found to be takings. The greater the deprivation of use, the greater the likelihood that a “taking” will be found. C-4 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ ²µ ²µ ²µ ²µ ²µ²µ ²µ ²µ ²µ ²µ ²µ L O C U S T G R O V E H U B B A R D S T A R C A N A D A I N T E R S T A T E 8 4 M C D E R M O T T L I N D E R L A K E H A Z E L C O L U M B I A V I C T O R Y F R A N K L I N C H E R R Y M C M I L L A N U S T I C K E A G L E C L O V E R D A L E T E N M I L E M E R I D I A N B L A C K C A T O V E R L A N D C H I N D E N A M I T Y N .C . N .C . N .C . N .C . N .C . N .C . N .C . N .C . N .C . C e m e t e r y I T D I d a h o P o w e r C e m e t e r y T r e a t m e n t P l a n t M e r i d i a n P o l i c e S t a t e P o l i c e P o s t O f f i c e G e n . P l a z a C i t y H a l l G o l f C o u r s e L i b r a r y I d a h o P o w e r I d a h o P o w e r B o i s e R i v e r [ N e i g h b o r h o o d C e n t e r N .C . L e g e n d F u t u r e O v e r p a s s E n t r y w a y C o r r i d o r ²µ F i r e S t a t i o n n S c h o o l k j P a r k s Æ b T r a n s i t S t a t i o n F u t u r e F a c i l i t i e s ²µ n k j Æ b F u t u r e L a n d U s e s C i t y w i d e T e n M i l e I n t e r c h a n g e S p e c i f i c A r e a L o w D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l M e d i u m D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l H i g h D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l M e d -H i g h D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l P i p e l i n e E a s e m e n t C i v i c G r e e n S p a c e /P a r k L a n d L o w D e n s i t y E m p l o y m e n t H i g h D e n s i t y E m p l o y m e n t I n d u s t r i a l M i x e d E m p l o y m e n t M i x e d U s e R e s i d e n t i a l M i x e d U s e C o m m e r c i a l L i f e s t y l e C e n t e r L o w D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l M e d i u m D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l M e d -H i g h D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l H i g h D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l C o m m e r c i a l O f f i c e I n d u s t r i a l C i v i c O l d T o w n M i x e d U s e C o m m u n i t y M i x e d U s e N e i g h b o r h o o d M i x e d U s e N o n -R e s i d e n t i a l M i x e d U s e R e g i o n a l M i x e d U s e - I n t e r c h a n g e E x i s t i n g W a t e r w a y T e n M i l e I n t e r c h a n g e S p e c i f i c F u t u r e R o a d w a y R u r a l / E s t a t e R e s i d e n t i a l A D A C O U N T Y C A N Y O N C O U N T Y C i t y o f M e r i d i a n F u t u r e L a n d U s e M a p 0 0 .5 1 0 .2 5 M i l e s A d o p t e d M o n t h D a y , Y e a r T h e i n f o r m a t i o n s h o w n o n t h i s m a p i s c o m p i l e d f r o m v a r i o u s s o u r c e s a n d i s s u b j e c t t o c o n s t a n t r e v i s i o n . T h e C i t y o f M e r i d i a n m a k e s n o w a r r a n t y o r g u a r a n t e e a s t o t h e c o n t e n t , a c c u r a c y , t i m e l i n e s s , o r c o m p l e t e n e s s o f a n y o f t h e d a t a p r o v i d e d , a n d a s s u m e s n o l e g a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d o n t h i s m a p . P r e p a r e d b y M e r i d i a n P l a n n i n g D i v i s i o n P r i n t D a t e : J u l 2 7 , 2 0 1 6 N o t e s : S y m b o l s w i t h h a l o s i n d i c a t e g e n e r a l f u t u r e f a c i l i t y l o c a t i o n s . T h e s e s y m b o l s a r e n o t p a r c e l s p e c i f i c a n d m a y f l o a t t o n e a r b y a r e a s . L a n d u s e d e s i g n a t i o n s i n t h e T e n M i l e I n t e r c h a n g e S p e c i f i c A r e a a r e d i f f e r e n t f r o m t h e r e s t o f t h e C i t y . D e s i g n a t i o n s f o r t h a t a r e a a r e d e s c r i b e d i n t h e T e n M i l e I n t e r c h a n g e S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n . DAppendix FLUM City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan D-1 ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ Legend City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan E-1 EAppendix S Y M B O L L E G E N D E l e m e n t S y m b o l Ec o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t  La n d U s e  Na t u r a l R e s o u r c e s & S u s t a i n a b i l i t y  Pu b l i c S a f e t y  Pu b l i c F a c i l i t i e s a n d U t i l i t i e s  Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n  S Y M B O L L E G E N D E l e m e n t S y m b o l Pa r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n  Hi s t o r i c P r e s e r v a t i o n / S p e c i a l A r e a s  Ho u s i n g  Co m m u n i t y D e s i g n / L i v a b i l i t y  Po p u l a t i o n / D e m o g r a p h i c s  Go v e r n a n c e  S H A D I N G L E G E N D Go a l s Ob j e c t i v e s Ac t i o n I t e m s Flip over page flap, for use of Legend with Goals, Objectives, and Action Item tables in Chapters 2 through 7 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan EAppendix E-2 Legend S Y M B O L L E G E N D E l e m e n t S y m b o l Ec o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t  La n d U s e  Na t u r a l R e s o u r c e s & S u s t a i n a b i l i t y  Pu b l i c S a f e t y  Pu b l i c F a c i l i t i e s a n d U t i l i t i e s  Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n  S Y M B O L L E G E N D E l e m e n t S y m b o l Pa r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n  Hi s t o r i c P r e s e r v a t i o n / S p e c i a l A r e a s  Ho u s i n g  Co m m u n i t y D e s i g n / L i v a b i l i t y  Po p u l a t i o n / D e m o g r a p h i c s  Go v e r n a n c e  S H A D I N G L E G E N D Go a l s Ob j e c t i v e s Ac t i o n I t e m s ~ This page left intentionally blank ~ 1 Description of Future Land Use Map Changes (H-2016-0098) The following is a description of proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map. These changes are intended to better reflect the existing and built environment, and to more consistently represent existing land uses. Reviewing these descriptions alongside with the attached “working” land use map below may be useful. Please note that the temporary legend and the referenced symbology on this map is not intended for the final document, and exists only to highlight changes. To see what the final version will look like, please reference the “final” land use map included with the amended City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Map Changes Nearest Roadway Major Intersection Description of Change Comment North of Chinden and Black Cat Add Medium Low Density Residential In 2008 the County processed a change to add this region to Meridian’s Area of City Impact. A small area isolated area within this change never had a land use appropriately applied. North of Chinden and Black Cat Add Civic to lands near the Boise River The County has previously processed a change to add this region to Meridian’s Area of City Impact. South-west of Chinden and Black McDermott Add a future Park halo The Parks & Recreation Department has indicated that there may need to be in future park in this area at some point in the City’s future.. West side of Map Area Add the future State Highway 16 alignment and supporting road network as part of “Future Roadway” information This information is helpful to understand how planned improvements will impact existing roadways and future development in this area of Meridian. East side of Chinden and Meridian Remove Future Park symbol There is no planned park here and no location for it, per the Parks Dept. See note below. South-west of Chinden and Meridian Add Future Park symbol There is potential for a future park in this area, per the Parks Dept. South-east of Ustick and Black Cat Change Civic to Medium Density Residential in Lake at Cherry Lan Sub This change is intended to reflect existing homes currently shown under a civic land use. South-east of Ustick and Linder Change Medium Density Residential to Civic This change is intended to reflect the location of an existing pathway and open space corridor connecting the shown open space corridor with Tully Park (shown). 2 Nearest Roadway Major Intersection Description of Change Comment East of McDermott and Cherry Change from Low Density Residential to Civic This change is to reflect City owned property intended for development of a future park (Borup Park). East of Cherry and Ten Mile Add existing school overlay symbol This is an existing charter school (COMPASS) and the intent is to show what the Civic land use is. North-west of Pine and Linder Change from Medium and Medium High Density Residential to Civic at two (2) locations. This change is intended to reflect ownership of these areas by West Ada School District, in areas with constructed improvements (ball fields and tennis courts). North-east of Fairview and Eagle Remove future school symbol There are no plans and no land for development of a school in this area (Kleiner Park). North-east of Fairview and Eagle Change from Mixed Use Regional to Civic This change is to consistently show parks as a Civic land use on the Future Land Use Map (Kleiner Park). South-west of Locust Grove and Franklin Remove existing park symbol The small bark park which this symbol used to represent is no longer located here, and now exists at Storey Park. South-east of Linder and Franklin Change Commercial to Medium Density Residential This property is owned by the adjacent residential subdivision HOA, and is not a commercial property. North-west of Locust Grove and Interstate-84 Add existing school symbol This used to be a commercial property but is now under joint ownership by West Ada School District and Idaho State University. The property has several schools. South-east of Linder and Pine Remove future park symbol There is no plan for a park in this area. The existing school utilizes all of the available open space. Per Parks Dept. North-west of Locust Grove and Interstate-84 Change Commercial to Civic This used to be a commercial property but is now under joint ownership by West Ada School District and Idaho State University South-east of Overland and Eagle along Area of Impact line Remove Medium Density Residential land use area The County processed a change to remove this area from Meridian’s Area of City Impact. This area is already developed and serviced by Boise (Muir Woods). 3 Nearest Roadway Major Intersection Description of Change Comment South-east of Overland and Eagle along Area of Impact line Add Low Density Residential land use area The County processed a change to add this region to Meridian’s Area of City Impact. This area is part of a larger County subdivision already within Meridian’s Area of City Impact (Ranchos Los Altos). South-east of Victory and Eagle Remove Low Density Residential land use area The County processed a change to remove this region from Meridian’s Area of City Impact. This larger area and property ownership is within Boise’s Area of City Impact. South-west of Overland and Meridian Change Medium Density Residential to Civic and add existing school symbol This property is currently being developed as a new West Ada Middle School, and the change is intended to more consistently show school properties under Civic land uses. North-west of Victory and Meridian Change Low Density Residential to Office This change is intended to reflect a larger area of existing and developing office uses, currently shown under a residential land use. These properties developed under a PUD within a residential land use area (Strada Bellissima). South-east of Victory and Meridian Remove the “N.C.” or Neighborhood Commercial overlay from this Mixed Use Neighborhood land use. This area, under Council approval, has developed without elements central to the idea of Neighborhood Commercial, and does not in fact include any commercial or office uses. There is still a mix of residential uses and one church with L-O zoning. South-east of Victory and Meridian Remove future school symbol There is no longer any school facility planned within this area (Per West Ada School District). South-west of Victory and Eagle Change Medium Density Residential to Civic This change is intended to more consistently reflect ownership and development of a school by the West Ada School District (Siena Elementary School). North-east of Black Cat and Amity Add a future Fire Station halo The Fire Department has indicated that there will need to be a new Fire Station in this area at some point in the City’s future. 4 Nearest Roadway Major Intersection Description of Change Comment South-west of Victory and Ten Mile Add a future Park halo The Parks & Recreation Department has indicated that there may need to be in future park in this area at some point in the City’s future. South-east of Victory and Ten Mile Add a future Park halo The Parks & Recreation Department has indicated that there may need to be in future park in this area at some point in the City’s future.. South-west of Amity and Eagle Remove Park halo There is no plan for a public park in this area. Open space available would be in close proximity to the Future Lake Hazel park (Per Parks Dept). South-east of Amity and Eagle Add a future Park halo The Parks and Recreation Department is planning on a partnership with West Ada school site in this area. South-east of Lake Hazel and Eagle, immediately south of Lake Hazel Remove Civic The County processed a change to remove this area from Meridian’s Area of City Impact (Boise Ranch Golf Club). South-east of Lake Hazel and Eagle Remove Low Density Residential If the golf course north of this this does not redevelop within Meridian, terrain and access for this area is difficult to provide services. 5 Working Land Use Map 1 Detailed Text Changes (H-2016-0098) The proposed additions and changes to the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan are highlighted below; underline represents new text, while strike-through is removal of existing text. The first section describes changes to the text of the Comprehensive Plan, and the second to the Goals, Objectives, and Action Items in the Comprehensive Plan (policy statements). Underline and strikethrough list of changes to Comprehensive Plan Location Text Comment Chapter 1, Page 2 The Meridian Comprehensive Plan is an official policy guide for decisions concerning the physical development of the community. The Plan establishes goals, objectives and action items to implement the City’s policies regarding growth. The Plan works in concert with City Code and other planning-related documents like the City’s Strategic Plan, the City’s Sewer and Water Master Plans, the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Master Plan, and Capital Improvement Plans. It is also used in conjunction with each City department’s strategic plan and action plan. The Plan is not a set of standards or a means to enforce City Code. Instead, it indicates, in a general way, how the community should develop. Changes to add strategic plan to list go guiding documents, and to change the name of the Parks and Recreation master Plan. Chapter 2, Page 7 The City adopted a Design Manual by Resolution Number 09-647 on January 27th, 2009 as an addendum to the City’s Comprehensive Plan. On February 16th, 2016, the City replaced the Design Manual with an Architectural Standards Manual (ASM). The ASM The Design Manual includes guidelines standards and a that are part of the citywide design review process that encourages the aesthetic development of the physical and built environment and results in an attractive, livable community. For their parts in the design review process, the ASM focuses on building design and the Unified Development Code on site design. Since adopting the ASM changed City process, staff felt it was important to reflect that in this update. Chapter 3, Page 18 However, we the City recognizes that some development may precede the ability of the City, on its own, to extend services for such development. Upon formal requests to the City for development that is on property not immediately serviceable with urban services, the City Council may consider said applications at a noticed meeting to determine if the proposed level of development is appropriate and in the best interests of the City. Grammatical correction Chapter 3, Page 19 Ada County will issue no building permit for said development(s) unless or until the applicant for such building permit provides documentation that park impact fees required by the City of Meridian have been collected or waived by the City of Meridian. This text is not accurate and in recent memory, has never been the case. 2 Location Text Comment Chapter 3, Page 19 The City recognizes that some development may precede our ability to annex the property. Developments within the AOCI but outside City limits will only be considered if the following standards and conditions are agreed to by the developer(s): • The development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development. • An irrevocable consent to annexation is a condition of hook-up to City sanitary sewer or water, is made a deed restriction on all buildable lots, and is placed as a note on all final plats. • All City sewer and water inspection and plan review fees (for the main lines) in effect at the time of development are paid to the City of Meridian. • Development is consistent with the Future Land Use Map designation for the property. The City of Meridian is committed to fulfilling the terms of its Area of City Impact Agreement with Ada County as well as similar agreements with neighboring cities including Eagle, Kuna, Star, and Boise. We also note the City’s intent to continue working with the County and surrounding cities on Area of City Impact boundaries and development policies. These changes reflects current practice. Chapter 3, Page 21 High Density: to allow for the development of multi-family homes in areas where urban services are provided. Residential gross densities may should exceed fifteen dwelling units per acre. Development might include duplexes, apartment buildings, townhouses, and other multi-unit structures. A desirable project would consider the placement of parking areas, fences, berms, and other landscaping features to serve as buffers between neighboring uses. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design that incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and individual project identity. There are always exceptions, but densities less than 15 units/acre are targeted for the Medium High Density Future Land Use. High Density should be 15 units/acre or higher. 3 Location Text Comment Chapter 3, Page 22 This designation includes the historic downtown and the true community center. The boundary of the Old Town district predominantly follows Meridian’s historic plat boundaries. In several areas, both sides of a street were incorporated into the boundary to encourage similar uses and complimentary design of the facing houses and buildings. Sample uses include offices, retail and lodging, theatres, restaurants, and service retail for surrounding residents and visitors. A variety of residential uses are also envisioned and could include reuse of existing buildings, new construction of multi-family residential over ground floor retail or office uses. In order to provide and accommodate preservation of the historic character, tThe City has developed specific Design architectural Guidelines standards for this area Old Town and other traditional neighborhood areas. Pedestrian amenities are emphasized in Old Town via streetscape standards. Public investment that ensures that Old Town becomes a centralized activity center, with public, cultural, and recreational structures are encouraged, and the City’s decision to build the new City Hall in Old Town is testament to its commitment to the area. Changes to reflect existing policy and adopted standards. Chapter 3, Page 41 The City has also adopted the Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan, which is intended to preserve for and work towards long-term connectivity and streetscape improvements. New paragraph at the end of the Downtown Transportation Network section, and is intended to reflect existing policy, Chapter 5, Page 68 Fortunately, very few natural or man-made hazards exist within the City of Meridian and its Area of City Impact. Without large industrial complexes, airports, petroleum tank farms and other uses which generate safety and pollution concerns, the City is relatively free of hazardous areas. As more development occurs however, safety concerns and hazardous areas will likely increase from more service stations, increased traffic, and storage of hazardous chemicals associated with certain businesses. While federal regulations provide protection to a degree, as development increases, so will the potential for spills, accidents, and fires. The City coordinates with Ada County Emergency Management on natural hazard disaster preparedness, response, and mitigation and is a plan participant in the Ada County Hazard Mitigation Plan. Text additions made to reflect current emergency management participation efforts. Chapter 6, Page 77 Public school facilities in the City of Meridian are part of the Joint West Ada School District No. 2 (aka Meridian School District), which serves an area larger than the City of Meridian and its Area of City Impact. The dDistrict covers 384 square miles and serves the cities of Meridian, Star, Eagle, western and south- western portions of Boise, part of Garden City, and the unincorporated areas of Ada County that lie between these municipalities. In total, there are 31 elementary schools, 9 middle schools, 5 comprehensive high schools, 2 alternative high schools, 1 charter high school, and 1 magnet high school throughout Meridian the West Ada School District. Text changes to change the name of West Ada School District from previous official names and short names. 4 Location Text Comment Chapter 6, Page 77 Enrollment growth has placed tremendous demands on schools in recent past. Since 2000, the District has opened eight elementary schools, three middle schools, one alternative middle school, two high schools, and one alternative high school. In the past ten years, Meridian West Ada School District has opened schools at a faster pace than any dDistrict in the history of the state of Idaho. With an additional 1,000 students per year projected to move into the dDistrict, this rate of new school construction is expected to continue into the foreseeable future. Land acquisition for future school sites within Meridian West Ada School District are based upon the following acreage standards: Text changes to change the name of West Ada School District from previous official names and short names. Chapter 6, Page 78 Based on past trends, Meridian West Ada School District estimates that approximately 1,000 acres of land will be needed within the City of Meridian’s Area of City Impact to meet the needs of all existing and projected K-12 students. As shown on the Future Land Use Map, about one elementary school is projected within each square mile of the City. Depending upon the residential density of an area and other build-out factors, the District estimates that it will need at least one middle school for every two to two and a half square miles and one high school for every three square miles of fully developed land. Text changes to change the name of West Ada School District from previous official names and short names. Chapter 6, Page 79 The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is the primary recreation service provider for Meridian. Quality parks, recreation facilities, activities and programs are considered by most Meridian residents to be vital in promoting overall quality of life. The Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for maintaining public open spaces and providing a quality system of parks and recreation facilities and positive leisure opportunities available to all persons in the community. The Department is also responsible for the development and maintenance of the pathways system and urban forest. Parks and Recreation also offers a variety of recreational programs, adult sports leagues, special events, and handles shelter/field reservations and temporary use permits. Meridian parks and recreation facilities and recreational programs provide residents with safe outlets for entertainment, exercise, social activities, and learning opportunities. Meridian parks and recreation facilities provide residents with safe outlets for entertainment, exercise, social activities, and learning opportunities. Further, parks and open space help to regulate air quality and climate, counter the warming effects of paved surfaces, recharge groundwater and protect lakes and streams from polluted runoff. As such, they are directly and indirectly beneficial to all Meridian residents regardless of personal use. Text changes to reflect direction from recently adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Chapter 6, Page 79 The City also seeks to continue expanding its pathway system by coordinating new projects with regional partners, and providing safe, tightly integrated pathways linking popular destinations such as schools and parks to neighborhood centers. Therefore, the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Plan (CPRSP) and Pathways Master Plan should be used when evaluating proposed development for consistency with the City’s plans. Change to reflect new name for Parks and Recreation Master Plan 5 Location Text Comment Chapter 6, Page 80 Meridian envisions a vibrant arts and entertainment scene that integrates the arts experience into everyday life and enhances the spirit of the City. As part of its commitment to raising awareness of existing opportunities and providing new offerings to experience art, the City created the Meridian Arts Commission (MAC) in 2006. MAC wants to ensure continued access to a variety of offerings for all residents, regardless of age, race, or ability. In addition to supporting the arts, the City seeks to continue its encouragement of Community Events. Programs such as the Dairy Days Festival, Chili Cook-Off, Firefighter’s Salmon BBQ, Free Family Fishing Day, the Meridian Symphony Orchaestra, and others are vital to community well being. The continued availability of a variety of social opportunities is essential in promoting community for all residents. Other opportunities to support new facilities for community enrichment, education, and outreach should be explored. Text correction Chapter 6, Page 81 Meridian uses the Mayor-Council form of local government. The job of the City Council, which includes the Mayor, is to adopt codes that govern the City in addition to applicable state and federal laws, create an annual budget, and oversee all of the City’s fiscal matters. The City of Meridian promotes citizen involvement in government by inviting residents to serve on a variety of boards, commissions, and committees designed to assist City leaders in information gathering and deliberative processes. Some of the volunteer boards and commission in Meridian are: Parks & Recreation Commission, Planning & Zoning Commission, Meridian Arts Commission, Historical Preservation Commission, Traffic Safety Commission, Meridian Transportation Task Force, Impact Fee Advisory Committee, Solid Waste Advisory Commission and the Mayor’s Youth Advisory Council. Text changes to reflect current commission and task force opportunities Chapter 7, Page 87 One of the key ways that the Comprehensive Plan becomes an improved tool for growth is to align it with other established plans and goals for the City. The specific plans and documents that are adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan include: the Existing Conditions Report, the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan, the City of Meridian Strategic Plan, the Design Architectural Standards Manual, the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Plan, the Meridian Pathways Master Plan, Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan, Destination Downtown, Communities in Motion, ACHD’s Roadways to Bikeways Bicycle Master Plan, and the Master Street Map, Complete Streets Policy, and the Livable Street Design Guide from ACHD’s Transportation and Land Use Integration Plan (TLIP), and the Ada County Emergency Plans and Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan. The City hereby adopts as addenda to the Comprehensive Plan the versions of these documents in effect at the time the Comprehensive Plan is approved by the City Council, and as amended. Text change to reference previously enacted plans, policy, and Ada County Emergency Plans. Chapter 7, Page 87 The Comprehensive Plan has a symbiotic relationship with and works in concert with City Code, the City’s Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Plan, the City’s Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy, the City’s Sewer and Water Master Plans, other department master plans, capital improvement plans, and various transportation plans and studies. It is also used in conjunction with each City department’s strategic plan, action plan, and annual employee performance appraisal Position Accountability Definition (PAD’s). Change to reflect annual employee review process. 6 Underline and strikethrough list of changes to GOA. Additions or revisions to the Support 1 and Support 2 columns are not official changes as they are not included within the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and are for internal use only. Some items may have no revisions and are only listed as status updates. For a complete list of all Goals, Objectives, and Action Items (GOA) with all changes, see the attached City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan which includes all proposed changes. I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 2.01.01G Develop programs, in partnership with allied agency responders, which focus on preventative emergency medical services risk reduction. High Fire [New] Fire request 2.01.02D Use the Comprehensive Plan, the Unified Development Code, and the Architectural Standards Design Manual to discourage strip development, and encourage clustered, landscaped business or residential development on entryway corridors. On-going Community Development Change to ASM 2.01.03C Continue supporting community-betterment activities such as "Old Town Community Cleanup" and "Rake Up Meridian." On-going Police Mayor's Office Mayor's Office Mayor’s Office request 2.01.03H Budget for the construction of Welcome signs throughout the City. Medium Community Development Mayor's Office Mayor's Office Mayor’s Office request 2.01.04B Require all new and reconstructed parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands and along streets, and to positively influence the physical and visual environment through screening, paving materials, and other landscape techniques. On-going Community Development This change is to memorialize and incorporate a previous Design Manual guideline, # B- 1.5.2.1. This was a site design guideline that was not appropriate for the new Architectural Standards Manual. 2.01.04E [Removed] Evaluate with Ada County the ability to have homeowners' exemption status applied immediately for purchased homes that were either vacant, rental, or foreclosure properties. NA High NA Community Development Discussed with County several years ago and no. 7 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 3.01.01E Develop incentives that encourage utilization of unimproved or underdeveloped land within City limits in order to maximize public investments, and curtail urban sprawl. Medium Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 3.01.01J Work with transportation agencies and private property owners to preserve transportation corridors, future transit routes and infrastructure, road and highway extensions, and to facilitate access management planning; use COMPASS' Access Management Toolkit. On-going Community Development We don't use access management toolkit. 3.01.02B Establish incentives for new commercial development within under-utilized existing commercial areas. Highest Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 3.01.02E [Removed] Coordinate with ACHD and Ada County to ensure policies and regulations are consistent with the 2011 Airport- Overland Study. Ensure that development accommodates the Overland Road extension, west of Ten Mile. NA High NA Community Development Completed. We have an on- going for this. 3.03.02C 3.02.01A Coordinate population and household projections keeping school sites in mind. On-going Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 3.02.01E Actively involve West Ada Joint School District No. 2 in subdivision site selection with developer before processing applications (pre-application meetings). On-going Community Development JSD#2 name change to West Ada 3.02.01F Work with West Ada Joint School District No. 2 so elementary schools are sited in locations that are safe for the children, easily accessible by automobile, transit, walking and bicycle. Elementary schools should not be "hidden" within subdivisions or otherwise made inaccessible to the public. On-going Community Development JSD#2 name change to West Ada 3.02.01H Work with ACHD, ITD and West Ada Joint School District No. 2 to establish and map safe bicycle and pedestrian routes to schools. On-going Community Development JSD#2 name change to West Ada 8 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 3.02.01I Assist West Ada Joint School District No. 2 as needed in identifying future school sites, including by providing information about potential developments and future land uses. On-going Community Development JSD#2 name change to West Ada 3.03.01B Support VRT’s efforts to construct a multi-modal transit center downtown. Medium High Community Development There have been no efforts in years, but we would when conditions are appropriate. 3.03.01C Improve ingress and egress (both pedestrian and vehicle) in Old Town. On-going Highest Community Development This should change to on- going. 3.03.01D Pursue the extension of Idaho Ave and/or Broadway Ave to Commercial Drive. Support split corridor traffic pattern downtown, using Main Street and Meridian Road. Medium On-going Community Development Split corridor built and done. Reference the next element in Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan instead. 3.03.01E Pursue construction of the City’s pathway network to and through downtown. On-going Medium Parks Parks request. 3.03.01F Pursue bicycle routes/lanes to and through downtown. On-going Highest Community Development Pine project will resolve largest gap. Completion of east 3rd the next hurdle. 3.03.01G Work with ACHD to implement projects from the Downtown Meridian Pedestrian and Bicycle survey. On-going Highest Community Development This plan is done and referenced as needed. 3.03.02A Work with COMPASS, ACHD, ITD and other regional partners to develop and manage a well-planned, sustainable, multi- modal transportation system. On-going Medium Community Development This is more of an on-going. 3.03.02B Pursue the extension of East 3rd Street from Fairview to Pine and a future signal at East 3rd Street / Fairview. Medium Low Community Development With development interests around the area we should up the priority of this. 9 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 3.03.02E Develop continuous pedestrian walkways within the downtown area. On-going Medium Community Development Efforts are on-going. 3.03.02H Encourage and promote the development of an overpass at the intersection of Linder Road and I-84 by ITD and ACHD. The overpass should accommodate pedestrians. Medium High Community Development The priority here does not reflect City’s yearly prioritization for roadways. 3.03.02I Encourage and promote the development of an interchange at the intersection of McDermott Road / SH-16 Road extension and I-84 by ITD. Medium On-going Community Development Shown on Dept. maps and preserved for. 3.03.02J Encourage and promote construction of the Eagle Road cCorridor improvements by ITD. On-going Community Development Work is on-going 3.03.02K [Removed] Encourage and promote the reconstruction of the Meridian Road Interchange by ITD. NA Highest NA Community Development This is done 3.03.02L Encourage and promote the preservation and expansion of Chinden Boulevard (US 20/26) by ITD. Highest Medium Community Development Actively discussing and coordinating. 3.03.02M [Removed] Identify at least one neighborhood per year to work with to submit an application to the ACHD Neighborhood Enhancement Program for traffic-calming measures and/or sidewalk improvements. NA On-going NA Community Development No longer applicable 3.03.02P Require the improving and maintaining of landscaping along public rights-of-way and landscaping of dedicated but unimproved rights-of-way strips. On-going Community Development Text clarification 3.03.02Q Consider needed sidewalk, pathway, and lighting improvements the Eagle Road Corridor Study along with in all land-use decisions along SH-55. On-going Community Development Plan is no longer relevant, but connectivity improvements still needed. 3.03.02R Improve coordination Refine procedures for coordinating with ACHD, ITD, VRT, COMPASS and developers in addressing transportation issues and needs before public hearings. Highest Community Development Text clarification 10 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 3.03.02S Work with ACHD, neighborhoods, and the city's Transportation Commission to promote traffic calming and safety where problems exist. On-going Highest Community Development Work is on-going 3.03.03E Except in North Meridian and the Ten Mile Specific Area, where a specific collector system is planned, realize continuous, grid-like collectors at regular intervals around the north-south and east-west half-mile lines within the undeveloped sections of Meridian's Area of City Impact at the time of new development. Such collectors should be the primary designated bike lane routes in lieu of arterial streets, whenever possible. On-going Community Development Grid-like is a unique description that may represent section mile roads, but not curvilinear collectors. Regular intervals (e.g. 1/4 and 1/2), yes. 3.03.04A Support COMPASS efforts to study the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) corridor for multi-use pathway and mass transit. On-going Community Development Change to reflect more immediate pathway need 3.03.04B Explore Encourage additional mobility options for people who do not drive; use COMPASS' Mobility Management Checklist. Medium-High On-going Community Development Text clarification to not presuppose a need. 3.03.04D In cooperation with COMPASS, VRT, and ACHD, continue to investigate the opportunities for providing Park & Ride lots, shuttle buses, and other forms of alternative transportation. On-going Community Development Add additional partners 3.03.04G Work with COMPASS and VRT on bringing public bus transportation to and through Meridian. Medium On-going Community Development Text clarification to not presuppose one solution. 3.03.04H Work with ACHD, COMPASS, and VRT to iIdentify two to four specific parcels for future park & ride lots and/or transit stations. Medium Community Development Text change to be more general. 3.03.04K Consider ACHD's MSM (Master Street Map) Roadways to Bikeways Plan in all land use decisions. On-going Community Development Change to reference more applicable policy reference. 3.04.01A [Removed] Evaluate potential for impact fees for lighting, landscaping, pathways and other pedestrian facilities. NA Medium NA Parks Community Development Parks Dept. indicated that pathways, landscaping and pedestrian facilities are not impact fee eligible. 11 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 3.04.01J Regularly assess law enforcement and emergency service needs. Annually assess and compare response times to adopted standards for identification of needed growth. On-going Police / Fire Fire request – text clarification. 3.04.01M [Removed] Create a future facilities map that identifies areas for new public facilities. NA Highest NA Community Development Previous Council did not want. 3.05.02G Evaluate the need for Require new residential development to provide permanent perimeter fencing, and fencing to contain construction debris on site and prevent windblown debris from entering adjacent agricultural and other properties. On-going Community Development This is not always black and white; there are also alternatives. 3.05.03D Coordinate with Ada County and establish and maintain an Area of City Impact Agreement, to ensure that rural areas are developed in accordance with all applicable provisions of this plan. On-going High Community Development Work is on-going 3.06.02G Develop incentives for high-density development along major transportation corridors to support public transportation system. Low Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 3.07.01C Identify parts of Old Town to Ppromote for high density residential development in Old Town. High Community Development Old Town already allows high density, and there's also high density designations adjacent to it. 3.07.01F Provide incentives (density bonus, reduced open space requirements, less impact fees) for infill development. On-going Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 3.07.01H Require an open housing market for all persons, regardless of protected class, ie: race, sex, age, religion, disability, handicap, family status or ethnic background. On-going High Legal This is not a one-time project, but an ongoing goal. 3.07.01I Develop incentives for a variety of housing types, suitable for various income groups. On-going Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 12 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 3.07.01K Look for incentives to encourage the development of accessible, single-family home designs. On-going Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 3.07.01N Diversify and balance the location of up to 1,200 square foot housing throughout the City (e.g., avoid concentration of one housing type in a geographical area). LowOn-going Community Development This is very specific and intentional effort, not on-going 3.07.02E Use the Architectural Standards Manual Design Manual. On-going Community Development Change to reflect new name. 3.07.02M Evaluate the potential to use density transfers through Planned Unit Developments in exchange for school sites, open space dedications, or for access easements to linear open space corridors, which contain bicycle and/or pedestrian pathway systems. Medium On-going Community Development This is not on-going. It's a specific endeavor that we've not evaluated one-way or another. 3.07.02O Elevate quality of design for houses and apartments; Evaluate the need for design review guidelines for single-family homes, particularly in Old Town. Medium On-going Community Development This is not on-going. It's a specific endeavor that we've not evaluated one-way or another. 3.07.03B Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes and multi-family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. On-going Community Development Revisions to be more generic. Mobile only allowed in R-15. 4.01.01C Provide incentives and standards to attract high-quality businesses. High Economic Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 4.04.01C Provide plazas and public areas for and integrate them as destinations that provide places for recreation, social gathering, and civic activities. On-going Community Development Modified to incorporate old Design Manual guideline (B- 1.6.3.1) that was not appropriate for the new Architectural Standards Manual, and preserved for integration into Comp Plan. 13 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 4.04.01H Develop programs with the Meridian Development Corporation to encourage and support development of the arts, cultural and educational facilities in Old Town. On-going Finance Mayor's Office Mayor's Office Legal is no longer direct staff support for MAC/HPC 4.04.01I Develop incentives to encourage higher density housing throughout Old Town. Medium Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 4.04.01O Implement the City of Meridian Design Standards and City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual downtown design guidelines and standards that will ensure that downtown remains the historic center for mixed-use tourism, business, retail, residential, and governmental activities. On-going Community Development Revisions to reflect current plan and policy names. 4.04.01Q Support development that aligns with Promote the downtown districts identified in the Destination Downtown plan. Highest Community Development MDC’s role, but City can support. 4.04.01S Develop incentives to attract new and retain the existing institutional, commercial, and government facilities to remain/locate in Old Town. High Economic Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 5.02.01A Develop incentives for the preservation and restoration of historic and architecturally significant buildings. Medium Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 5.02.02A Coordinate with the Meridian Historic Preservation Commission to recommend restoration of historical buildings. Highest Community Development Finance H.P.C. [No text change] Added Finance and HPC as support 5.02.02B Investigate tax incentive programs for historic properties. Low Community Development Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 5.02.02D Undertake programs that will increase the community's awareness of its heritage and the economic as well as aesthetic value of historic preservation. On-going Council Finance H.P.C. [No text change] Added Finance and HPC as support 14 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 5.02.02E Conduct activities directed toward stimulating private and public investment in the restoration and preservation of historic buildings, outdoor spaces, and natural historic features. On-going Council Finance H.P.C. [No text change] Added Finance and HPC as support 5.02.02F Support the efforts of the Historic Preservation Commission to foster preservation and conservation. On-going Council Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 5.02.02H Place informational plaque on historic structures and special sites. Highest Finance Legal H.P.C. Legal is no longer direct staff support for MAC/HPC 5.02.02I Seek funding services for grants to promote historic preservation. On-going Finance Legal H.P.C. Legal is no longer direct staff support for MAC/HPC 5.02.02L Provide funding to the Historic Preservation Commission through the City's annual budget. On-going Council Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 5.02.02M Establish and maintain a system to survey and identify cultural and historical resources within City limits and maintain a local inventory of all identified sites, buildings and resources. Medium H.P.C. I.T. Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 5.02.02N Develop City code to preserve and protect historic and culturally significant structures and sites. Lowest Community Development Finance H.P.C. [No text change] Added Finance to support 5.02.02Q Encourage events and activities that celebrate the cultural heritage of Meridian. On-going Mayor's Office Finance Historical Preservation Commission [No text change] Added Finance to support 5.03.01I [Removed] Educate design/builders, and small businesses about the benefits of selecting low greenhouse gas emitting products and appliances. NA Medium NA Community Development NA Public Works This was previously under Environmental. CD has no resources to do this. 5.04.01F Research and compile successfully-implemented, incentive- based energy conservation strategies for use in both residential and commercial settings, from other municipalities. Low Medium Community Development Public Works Previously under Environmental. CD has no resources for this, but keep as Low. 15 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 5.05.01B Establish solid waste fees that encourage waste reduction and recycling ("pay as you throw"). On-going Council Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 5.06.02C [Removed] Develop informational resources on green building strategies, and make available to the community. NA Medium NA Community Development This was previously under Environmental. CD has no resources to develop. 5.08.03D Encourage landscaping implementing the appropriate and attractive use of xeric, drought-tolerant plant species and non-plant materials to reduce maintenance and water consumption. On-going Community Development [New] This is from the old Design Manual (C-1.6.2.2.2), and was flagged as something not appropriate for the new Architectural Standards Manual, but to be kept as a policy statement in the Comp Plan. 6.02.01C Require adequate fees from new development to fund expansion of services. On-going Council Finance [No text change] Added Finance to support 6.02.02A Support joint use agreements with the West Ada Meridian Joint School District No. 2, Western Ada Recreation District, ACHD, irrigation districts, and other private and non-profit entities. On-going Council JSD#2 name change to West Ada 6.02.02B Communicate with essential service providers and local decision-makers to coordinate planning efforts and direction of growth. Service providers include but are not limited to: All City Departments, ITD, ACHD, COMPASS, VRT, Irrigation Districts, Western Ada Recreation District, Ada County, St. Luke's Hospital, St. Alphonsus Hospital, West Ada Joint School District No. 2, Meridian Library District, Idaho Power, Century Link, Intermountain Gas, Solid Waste, Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Department of Environmental Quality, Central District Health Department, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Highest Council JSD#2 name change to West Ada 16 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 6.03.01A Provide both permanent and rotating works of art in City Hall and other public places. On-going Finance Mayor's Office Meridian Arts Commission Mayor's Office MAC staff support in Finance now 6.03.01C Utilize Evaluate and establish a percent for art ordinance funding to raise awareness and appreciation of the arts. Medium Finance Mayor's Office Meridian Arts Commission Mayor's Office Item is completed, but revised for implementation. Finance staff support MAC now. 6.03.01D Establish an Art and Cultural District High Medium Community Development Finance Changed to reflect stakeholder interest and efforts. Added Finance to support 6.03.01E Provide local artists opportunities to showcase their work. On-going Finance Mayor's Office Meridian Arts Commission Mayor's Office Finance staff support MAC now. 6.04.01A Develop and offer youth art opportunities at and after school. On-going Finance Mayor's Office Parks Mayor's Office Finance staff support MAC now. 6.04.01B Provide arts education for adults and seniors, and partner with other community organizations to support and encourage arts programs. On-going Finance Mayor's Office Parks Finance staff support MAC now. 6.04.01C Present a variety of performing arts locally. On-going Finance Mayor's Office Parks Mayor's Office Finance staff support MAC now. 6.04.01D Sponsor performing arts in partnership with community organizations. On-going Council Finance Meridian Arts Commission [No text change] Added Finance and MAC to support. 6.04.01E Raise awareness and promote existing arts offerings and artwork within the community. On-going Finance Mayor's Office Meridian Arts Commission Mayor's Office Finance staff support MAC now. 6.05.01E Maintain a Critical Task Analysis plan for Fire and Police responses within the jurisdiction Compose a hazard response plan with Fire and Police departments. High Police / Fire Fire request 6.05.01H Allocate resources to define, locate, map, and establish response plans for target hazards within the jurisdiction Define, locate, and map hazardous areas. High Fire Fire request 17 I.D. Goals / Objectives / Action Items Priority Responsible Lead Support 1 Support 2 Additional Comments provided by Departments. 6.05.01I Allocate resources to develop and implement Community Risk Reduction programs Compose and implement standards and mitigation measures for development near the Northwest Pipeline and the liquefied natural gas tank in northwest Meridian. Highest Fire Fire request. Duplicative with new text for 6.05.01H. 6.06.01A Conduct regular training with City staff to ensure that they properly adhere to and apply provisions of Idaho Code §67- 8003 in land use planning and development review processes. On-going High Legal This is on-going work. 7.01.01M Educate the public and advisory boards so that they understand the Comprehensive Plan's legal elements and intent. On-going High Legal This is on-going work. 20 1 6 C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n & Fu t u r e L a n d U s e M a p U p d a t e Pl a n n i n g & Z o n i n g C o m m i s s i o n Se p t e m b e r 1 , 2 0 1 6 Pr o j e c t H i s t o r y • T h e p r e v i o u s C o m p r e h e n s i v e Pl a n w a s r e f o r m a t t e d , r e f r e s h e d , an d a d o p t e d A p r i l 1 9 , 2 0 1 1 • Y e a r l y r e v i e w o f p o l i c y st a t e m e n t s ; i n c l u d i n g s e v e r a l t e x t am e n d m e n t s • F i r s t C i t y – i n i t i a t e d M a p am e n d m e n t s i n c e 2 0 1 2 ( S o u t h Me r i d i a n ) De s c r i p t i o n o f A p p l i c a t i o n • T e x t C h a n g e s – M o s t l y c l e a n u p , u p d a t e d r e f e r e n c e s , or t o i n f o r m c u r r e n t e f f o r t s • P o l i c y S t a t e m e n t C h a n g e s (G o a l s , O b j e c t i v e s , a n d A c t i o n It e m s ) – M o s t l y c l e a n u p a n d s t a t u s u p d a t e s • F u t u r e L a n d U s e M a p C h a n g e s – M o s t l y c l e a n u p a n d i n t e n d e d t o im p r o v e c o n s i s t e n c y Te x t R e v i s i o n S a m p l e ( s ) Pa g e T e x t R e v i s i o n Co m m e n t Ch a p t e r 1 , Pa g e 2 Th e M e r i d i a n C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n i s a n o f f i c i a l p o l i cy g u i d e f o r d e c i s i o n s c o n c e r n i n g th e p h y s i c a l d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e c o m m u n i t y . T h e P l a n e s t a b l i s h e s g o a l s , o b j e c t i v e s an d a c t i o n i t e m s t o i m p l e m e n t t h e C i t y ’ s p o l i c i e s r eg a r d i n g g r o w t h . T h e P l a n w o r k s i n co n c e r t w i t h C i t y C o d e a n d o t h e r p l a n n i n g - r e l a t e d d oc u m e n t s l i k e th e C i t y ’ s S t r a t e g i c Pl a n , t h e Ci t y ’ s S e w e r a n d W a t e r M a s t e r P l a n s , t h e Co m p r e h e n s i v e Pa r k s a n d Re c r e a t i o n Sy s t e m Ma s t e r Pl a n , a n d C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n s . I t i s a l s o u s e d i n co n j u n c t i o n w i t h e a c h C i t y d e p a r t m e n t ’ s s t r a t e g i c p la n a n d a c t i o n p l a n . T h e P l a n i s no t a s e t o f s t a n d a r d s o r a m e a n s t o e n f o r c e C i t y C od e . I n s t e a d , i t i n d i c a t e s , i n a ge n e r a l w a y , h o w t h e c o m m u n i t y s h o u l d d e v e l o p . Ch a n g e s t o a d d s t r a t e g i c p l a n t o l i s t g o gu i d i n g d o c u m e n t s , a n d t o c h a n g e t h e na m e o f t h e P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n m a s t e r Pl a n . Ch a p t e r 6 , Pa g e 7 7 En r o l l m e n t g r o w t h h a s p l a c e d t r e m e n d o u s d e m a n d s o n sc h o o l s i n r e c e n t p a s t . S i n c e 20 0 0 , t h e D i s t r i c t h a s o p e n e d e i g h t e l e m e n t a r y s c h o ol s , t h r e e m i d d l e s c h o o l s , o n e al t e r n a t i v e m i d d l e s c h o o l , t w o h i g h s c h o o l s , a n d o n e a l t e r n a t i v e h i g h s c h o o l . I n t h e pa s t t e n y e a r s , Me r i d i a n We s t A d a Sc h o o l D i s t r i c t h a s o p e n e d s c h o o l s a t a f a s t e r pa c e t h a n a n y d D is t r i c t i n t h e h i s t o r y o f t h e s t a t e o f I d a h o . W i t h a n a d d i t i o n a l 1 , 0 0 0 st u d e n t s p e r y e a r p r o j e c t e d t o m o v e i n t o t h e d D is t r i c t , t h i s r a t e o f n e w s c h o o l co n s t r u c t i o n i s e x p e c t e d t o c o n t i n u e i n t o t h e f o r e s ee a b l e f u t u r e . L a n d a c q u i s i t i o n f o r fu t u r e s c h o o l s i t e s w i t h i n Me r i d i a n We s t A d a Sc h o o l D i s t r i c t a r e b a s e d u p o n t h e fo l l o w i n g a c r e a g e s t a n d a r d s : Te x t c h a n g e s t o c h a n g e t h e n a m e o f W e s t Ad a S c h o o l D i s t r i c t f r o m p r e v i o u s o f f i c i a l na m e s a n d s h o r t n a m e s . Un d e r l i n e re p r e s e n t s n e w t e x t , w h i l e st r i k e - t h r o u g h is r e m o v a l o f e x i s t i n g t e x t Po l i c y S t a t e m e n t R e v i s i o n S a m p l e ( s ) I. D . G o a l s / O b j e c t i v e s / A c t i o n I t e m s P r i o r i t y Re s p o n s i b l e Le a d Su p p o r t 1 Ad d i t i o n a l C o m m e n t s pr o v i d e d b y D e p a r t m e n t s . 2. 0 1 . 0 2 D Us e t h e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n , t h e U n i f i e d De v e l o p m e n t C o d e , a n d t h e Ar c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s De s i g n Ma n u a l t o d i s c o u r a g e s t r i p d e v e l o p m e n t , a n d en c o u r a g e c l u s t e r e d , l a n d s c a p e d b u s i n e s s o r re s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t o n e n t r y w a y c o r r i d o r s . On - g o i n g Co m m u n i t y De v e l o p m e n t Ch a n g e t o A S M 2. 0 1 . 0 4 B Re q u i r e a l l n e w a n d r e c o n s t r u c t e d p a r k i n g l o t s t o pr o v i d e l a n d s c a p i n g i n i n t e r n a l i s l a n d s a n d a l o n g st r e e t s , a n d t o p o s i t i v e l y i n f l u e n c e t h e p h y s i c a l a n d vi s u a l e n v i r o n m e n t t h r o u g h s c r e e n i n g , p a v i n g ma t e r i a l s , a n d o t h e r l a n d s c a p e t e c h n i q u e s . On - g o i n g Co m m u n i t y De v e l o p m e n t Th i s c h a n g e i s t o m e m o r i a l i z e an d i n c o r p o r a t e a p r e v i o u s De s i g n M a n u a l g u i d e l i n e , # B - 1. 5 . 2 . 1 . T h i s w a s a s i t e d e s i g n gu i d e l i n e t h a t w a s n o t ap p r o p r i a t e f o r t h e n e w Ar c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l . 3. 0 2 . 0 1 E Ac t i v e l y i n v o l v e We s t A d a Jo i n t Sc h o o l D i s t r i c t No . 2 in su b d i v i s i o n s i t e s e l e c t i o n w i t h d e v e l o p e r b e f o r e pr o c e s s i n g a p p l i c a t i o n s ( p r e - a p p l i c a t i o n m e e t i n g s ) . On - g o i n g Co m m u n i t y De v e l o p m e n t JS D # 2 n a m e c h a n g e t o W e s t Ad a 4. 0 4 . 0 1 H De v e l o p p r o g r a m s w i t h t h e M e r i d i a n D e v e l o p m e n t Co r p o r a t i o n t o e n c o u r a g e a n d s u p p o r t d e v e l o p m e n t of t h e a r t s , c u l t u r a l a n d e d u c a t i o n a l f a c i l i t i e s i n O l d To w n . On - g o i n g Fi n a n c e Ma y o r ' s Of f i c e Ma y o r ' s Of f i c e Le g a l i s n o l o n g e r d i r e c t s t a f f su p p o r t f o r M A C / H P C Un d e r l i n e re p r e s e n t s n e w t e x t , w h i l e st r i k e - t h r o u g h is r e m o v a l o f e x i s t i n g t e x t Fu t u r e L a n d U s e M a p R e v i s i o n S a m p l e ( s ) E a g l e R d Ov e r l a n d R d Fu t u r e L a n d U s e C h a n g e s • Re d an d Gr e e n hi g h l i g h t e d a r e a s we r e c h a n g e s p r o c e s s e d b y A d a Co u n t y t o M e r i d i a n ’ s A r e a o f C i t y Im p a c t ( A O C I ) . • Bl u e hi g h l i g h t e d a r e a w a s c h a n g e d fr o m M e d i u m D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l t o Ci v i c . T h i s w a s f o r c o n s i s t e n c y t o ma t c h o t h e r o l d e r s c h o o l s i t e s s h o w n wi t h a C i v i c l a n d u s e . Ne x t S t e p s • T o n i g h t , C i t y s t a f f a r e r e q u e s t i n g a r e c o m m e n d a t i o n of a p p r o v a l t o M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l f o r b o t h t h e t ext an d m a p c h a n g e s p r o p o s e d f o r t h e C o m p P l a n • P u b l i c H e a r i n g a t C i t y C o u n c i l f o r a p p r o v a l • N e x t y e a r : – A n n u a l r e v i e w o f p o l i c y s t a t e m e n t s ; a n d – U p d a t e E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s R e p o r t , w h i c h i s a n a d d e n d u m to t h e C o m p P l a n . QU E S T I O N S QU E S T I O N S QU E S T I O N S QU E S T I O N S