The URL can be used to link to this page

PZ - Traffic Impact StudySt. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 St. Ignatius Elementary School Traffic Study and School Site Checklist Prepared by: March 18, 2016 PG‐963‐1602 St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 ii Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Proposed Development ................................................................................................................................ 2 Site Location .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Land Use and Intensity .................................................................................................................................. 2 Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Proposed Development ................................................................................................................................ 4 Analysis of Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 4 Physical Characteristics ................................................................................................................................. 4 Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Level of Service ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Safety Related Deficiencies ........................................................................................................................... 8 Analysis of Background Traffic ...................................................................................................................... 8 Physical Characteristics ................................................................................................................................. 8 Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Level of Service ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Projected Traffic .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Pass‐By Trips ............................................................................................................................................... 12 Internal Trips ............................................................................................................................................... 12 Trip Distribution and Assignment ............................................................................................................... 12 Non‐Site Traffic Projections ........................................................................................................................ 16 Total Traffic ................................................................................................................................................. 16 Traffic Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Driveways and Other Access Points to ACHD and ITD System ................................................................... 18 Level of Service Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 18 Phasing Analyses ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Internal Project Site Circulation .................................................................................................................. 19 Projected Traffic on Internal Streets ........................................................................................................... 19 Conflict Points ............................................................................................................................................. 19 Design Features ........................................................................................................................................... 20 Other Features ............................................................................................................................................ 20 Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 21 School Site Checklist ................................................................................................................................... 22 1. Land Use Master Plan ......................................................................................................................... 22 2. School Bus Plan .................................................................................................................................. 22 3. Access Safety ...................................................................................................................................... 23 4. Pedestrian Plan ................................................................................................................................... 23 5. Crossing Guard Plan ........................................................................................................................... 23 6. Barriers Between Highways and School ............................................................................................. 24 7. Location of School Zone ..................................................................................................................... 24 8. Need for Flashing Beacon ................................................................................................................... 24 9. Need for Traffic Control Signal ........................................................................................................... 24 10. Anticipated Future Improvements ..................................................................................................... 24 11. Speed on Adjacent Highways ............................................................................................................. 26 St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 iii 12. Traffic Volumes on Adjacent Highways .............................................................................................. 26 13. Effect Upon the Highway’s Level of Service ....................................................................................... 26 14. Need for Acceleration or Deceleration Lanes .................................................................................... 29 15. Internal Traffic Circulation .................................................................................................................. 30 16. Anticipated Development on Surrounding Undeveloped Parcels ..................................................... 30 17. Zoning in the Vicinity .......................................................................................................................... 31 18. Access Control on Adjacent Highways ............................................................................................... 32 19. Required Striping and Signing Modifications ..................................................................................... 34 20. Funding of Highway Improvements to Accommodate Development ................................................ 34 21. Proposed Highway Projects in the Vicinity ......................................................................................... 34 22. Any Other Issues as May Be Considered to the Particular Application.............................................. 37 List of Tables Table 1: Level of Service Criteria ................................................................................................................... 7 Table 2: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Operations ................................................................................... 8 Table 3: Project Area Growth Rate ............................................................................................................... 8 Table 4: Opening Day Peak Hour Intersection Operations ......................................................................... 11 Table 5: Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................. 11 Table 6: Opening Day + Project Peak Hour Intersection Operations ......................................................... 18 Table 7: ACHD Highway LOS ....................................................................................................................... 27 Table 8: ACHD Access Spacing on Minor Arterials ...................................................................................... 33 Table 9: ACHD CIP 2022‐2026 ..................................................................................................................... 35 St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 iv List of Figures Figure 1: Site Location ................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Land Use ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3: Site Plan.......................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 4: Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes ...................................................... 6 Figure 5: ATR Locations ................................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 6: Future AM and PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes (Background Traffic) .................... 10 Figure 7: Student Distribution by Zip Code ................................................................................................. 13 Figure 8: Trip Distribution ........................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 9: AM and PM Peak Hour Project Traffic Turning Movement Volumes (Project Traffic) ................ 15 Figure 10: Opening Day + Project AM and PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes (Background + Project Traffic) ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 11: Meridian Road Southbound ....................................................................................................... 19 Figure 12: Meridian Road Northbound ....................................................................................................... 19 Figure 13: Land Use Master Plan ................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 14: Pedestrian Plan .......................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 16: ACHD Right Turns ....................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 15: Chinden Blvd./North Access EBR ............................................................................................... 25 Figure 17: Traffic Volumes on Adjacent Highways ..................................................................................... 26 Figure 18: Roadway Segment LOS ............................................................................................................. 28 Figure 19: Left‐Turn Lane Guidelines for Two‐Lane Roads, 45 mph ........................................................... 29 Figure 20: Right‐Turn Lane Guidelines for Two‐Lane Roadways ................................................................ 30 Figure 21: Surrounding Area ....................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 22: Zoning in the Vicinity ................................................................................................................. 32 Figure 23: Spacing on Meridian Road ......................................................................................................... 34 Figure 24: Transportation Improvement Program ..................................................................................... 36 St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 1 Executive Summary Site Location The proposed project is located southwest of the intersection of Chinden Boulevard and Meridian Road in Meridian, Idaho. It will be between the existing Holy Apostles Catholic Church to the north and the residential neighborhood to the south, as shown in Figure 1. Study Area The study area consists of Chinden Boulevard/Meridian Road, the access to the east of Chinden Boulevard/Meridian Road, Meridian Road/Catholic Church Access, and Meridian Road/Rio Vista Way. Principal Findings The study area is able to accommodate the new school while still maintaining acceptable V/C ratios. Conclusions and Recommendations  The project is estimated to generate 1,197 vehicles per day based on 450 students at a private school (K‐8). 405 of these trips are estimated to take place during the AM peak hour while 270 of them are estimated to take place during the PM peak hour.  All study intersections operate with a V/C ratio below the LOS D threshold of 0.90 and continue to do so after growing background traffic to account for future growth.  Adding project traffic increases delay throughout the study area; however, all intersections continue to operate with a V/C ratio below the LOS D threshold of 0.90.  No operational mitigation is currently required. However, as the school increases its student population and background traffic increases, it is likely the Chinden/Meridian intersection will need to be improved through adding turn lanes or extra thru lanes.  A northbound right turn lane into the proposed new school access is warranted per ACHD guidelines. St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 2 Proposed Development Site Location The proposed project is located southeast of the intersection of Chinden Boulevard and Meridian Road in Meridian, Idaho. It will be between the existing Holy Apostles Catholic Church to the north and the residential neighborhood to the south, as shown in Figure 1. Land Use and Intensity The land for the proposed project is currently undeveloped. Meridian’s Land Use Map, shown in Figure 2, designates the project area as Mixed Use Community. Figure 1: Site Location Project Location St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 3 Site Plan The site plan contains the school, parking, outdoor classrooms, and other playgrounds, play areas, and athletic fields. The church to the north provides existing parking, and access is provided to both Meridian Road and Chinden Boulevard. This site plan is shown in Figure 3 and the Appendix. Figure 2: Land Use Project Location St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 4 Proposed Development The proposed development will be built in one phase, with opening day anticipated to be in the fall of 2017. Analysis of Existing Conditions Physical Characteristics Roadway Chinden Boulevard (U.S.20/26) is classified as an expressway with one travel lane in each direction and a two‐way left‐turn lane in the center. The posted speed limit is 55 mph near the study area. Meridian Road is a minor arterial with one travel lane in each direction with turn pockets at major intersections. The posted speed limit is 45 mph near the study area. Rio Vista Way is a two‐lane local road with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Traffic Control Devices The intersection of Chinden Boulevard/Meridian Road is signalized. The parameters defined in ACHD 7100 were used for the signalized intersection. These parameters included a 150s cycle length, minimum left time of 20s, and a lost time of 3s. PHFs were measured in the field and were used in place of the default value of 0.90. All other intersections are stop‐controlled. Figure 3: Site Plan St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 5 Transit Service There are no Valleyride routes near the study area. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities There are no bicycle or pedestrian facilities in the study area. However, there are intermittent bike lanes south of this project near McMillan Road that will likely continue north to Chinden Boulevard as Meridian Road is improved. Geometrics Chinden Boulevard travels east/west, and Meridian Road intersects it at a right angle. Rio Vista Way intersects Meridian Road at a right angle to the south of Chinden Boulevard. There are single left turn lanes at the Chinden/Meridian intersection with one separate right turn land at the westbound leg of the intersection. Traffic Volumes Turning movement counts were obtained at Chinden Boulevard/Meridian Road, Meridian Road/Holy Apostles Church entrance, and Meridian Road/Rio Vista Way in March, 2016 by Horrocks Engineers. Due to the nature of school peak traffic, the peak hours of traffic will be between 7:30‐8:30 AM and 2:30‐3:30 PM; which matches starting ending of school times. To best analyze the impact of the project, the counts were obtained during these hours. These counts were used to establish a base condition and estimate the direction of travel that vehicles will take to access and leave the site. The existing turning movement counts can be found in the Appendix and the volumes are shown in Figure 4. SCALE: DATE: St Ignatius Elementary School Existing AM and PM Traffic Volumes FIGURE 4 N/A 03/2016 2162 WEST GROVE PARKWAY SUITE #400 PLEASANT GROVE, UT. 84062 (801) 763-5100 1 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 2 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 3 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 4 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 1 3 2 4Chinden Blvd Me r i d i a n R o a d Holy Apostles Entrance Ri o V i s t a W a y No r t h A c c e s s St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 7 Level of Service Traffic conditions were simulated using the PTV Vistro software package. Using the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method of calculating intersection delay, a Level of Service (LOS) grade was assigned to each intersection for both the AM and PM peak hours. LOS is a term used by the HCM to describe the traffic operations of an intersection, based on congestion and delay. LOS ranges from A (almost no congestion or delay) to F (traffic demand exceeds capacity and the intersection experiences long queues and delay). LOS D is generally acceptable for urbanized intersections like the ones studied in this report. LOS E is the threshold when the intersection reaches capacity. The delay criteria used to assign a letter grade to an intersection for signalized and unsignalized intersections is shown below in Table 1. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Signalized Unsignalized A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 B > 10 ‐ 20 > 10 ‐ 15 C > 20 ‐ 35 > 15 ‐ 25 D > 35 ‐ 55 > 25 ‐ 35 E > 55 ‐ 80 > 35 ‐ 50 F > 80 > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) LOS is used to help size intersections, add turn lanes, change timing patterns, modify intersection layouts, estimate the delay per vehicle at an intersection, and quantify measures of effectiveness. ACHD also uses volume/capacity (V/C) ratios to measure LOS. A V/C of 0.90 is the threshold for LOS D and 1.00 is the threshold for LOS E. Using the counts obtained, the LOS of each study intersection was analyzed to determine the status of the study area without the proposed development. The analysis shows that all intersections operate at LOS D or better (V/C <0.9), with the exception of the shared nursery access on Chinden Boulevard. Due to the high volumes of traffic on Chinden Boulevard, delays for northbound lefts are high, even with a low volume of left‐turning vehicles. Despite the high delays, the low volumes cause the volume/capacity (V/C) ratios to be very low (0.03 during the PM peak hour) for that movement. As delays become unacceptable or a safety issue, the access will effectively operate as a right‐in/right‐out access. Eventually, based on access management standards, this access will become a right‐in/right‐out as Chinden Boulevard builds out to its expressway classification. The analysis results are summarized in Table 2. St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 8 Table 2: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Operations Intersection AM Peak hour PM Peak hour Control Delay (sec/veh) LOS V/C Ratio Control Delay (sec/veh) LOS V/C Ratio Existing Conditions Meridian Rd./Chinden Blvd. 51.6 D 0.688 52.6 D 0.690 Meridian Rd./Holy Apostles Church 14.9 B 0.000 22.5 C 0.142 Meridian Rd./Rio Vista Way 12.9 B 0.000 12.3 B 0.002 Chinden Blvd./North Access 38.4 E 0.000 51.8 F 0.025 *Control delay for unsignalized intersections shown for the worst approach only per the HCM. Safety Related Deficiencies The previously discussed analysis shows no major safety related deficiencies with the existing conditions. Analysis of Background Traffic Physical Characteristics There are no plans at this point to alter the physical characteristics of the study area within the timeframe of this analysis. Traffic Volumes In order to successfully analyze traffic conditions at opening day, background traffic must be increased to match the anticipated conditions in 2017. To find an appropriate growth rate, historic average annual daily traffic (AADT) counts from ITD’s automatic traffic recorders (ATRs) for nearby segments were used. These historic values indicate that there has been an average of nearly 2% annual growth in the area. Table 3 shows the values and Figure 5 shows the locations of the traffic counts. ATR 159 would have been used but it did not contain a sufficient amount of data. Table 3: Project Area Growth Rate ATR 3 Year 2015 AADT 2014 AADT 2013 AADT 2012 AADT Eagle Rd (ATR 270) 1.11% 36,532 35,901 35,716 35,348 1.76%0.52%1.04% McMillan (ATR 275) 1.05% 35,985 35,610 34,745 34,880 1.05%2.49%‐0.39% Longhorn (ATR 157) 3.81% 17,388 16,659 14,689 15,685 4.38%13.41%‐6.35% Average 1.99% St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 9 The 2% annual growth was applied to background traffic in order to simulate opening day conditions. These volumes are shown in Figure 6. Figure 5: ATR Locations Project Location SCALE: DATE: St Ignatius Elementary School Opening Day Background Traffic Traffic Volumes FIGURE 6 N/A 03/2016 2162 WEST GROVE PARKWAY SUITE #400 PLEASANT GROVE, UT. 84062 (801) 763-5100 1 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 2 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 3 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 4 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 1 3 2 4Chinden Blvd Me r i d i a n R o a d Holy Apostles Entrance Ri o V i s t a W a y No r t h A c c e s s St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 11 Level of Service The future background traffic was analyzed in the same way that the existing conditions were, and the results are shown in Table 4. Delays are slightly increased when compared to the existing conditions due to the 2% increase in traffic, but all intersections remain at acceptable levels according to the V/C LOS D threshold of 0.90. Once again, the access on Chinden Boulevard has high delays due to the delay of the northbound lefts. The V/C ratio is still low during the PM peak hour (0.03) for that movement. The access may effectively function as a right‐in/right‐out access during peak times. Table 4: Opening Day Peak Hour Intersection Operations Intersection AM Peak hour PM Peak hour Control Delay (sec/veh) LOS V/C Ratio Control Delay (sec/veh) LOS V/C Ratio Opening Day Conditions (Background Traffic) Meridian Rd./Chinden Blvd. 75.3 E 0.778 54.9 D 0.704 Meridian Rd./Holy Apostles Church 15.1 C 0.000 23.2 C 0.151 Meridian Rd./Rio Vista Way 13.0 B 0.000 12.4 B 0.002 Chinden Blvd./North Access 38.5 D 0.000 54.4 F 0.027 *Control delay for unsignalized intersections shown for the worst approach only per the HCM. Projected Traffic Trip Generation Project traffic was estimated using trip generation standards found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) publication Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. ITE does not provide daily rates for Private School (K‐8) (ITE 534). A comparison was made to Private School (K‐12) (ITE 536) in order to estimate a daily rate for Private School (K‐8). The AM, PM, and daily rates for K‐12 are 0.81, 0.17, and 2.48 respectively. Assuming a similar ratio between K‐8 and K‐12 AM, PM, and daily rates, results in a value of 2.66 for the daily rate for K‐8. Table 5 summarizes the trip generation using ITE rates for a Private School (K‐8). Table 5: Trip Generation Private School (K‐8) Variable Quantity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Private School (K‐8) (ITE 534) 2.66 50% 50% 0.9 55% 45% 0.60 47% 53% Students 450.0 1,197 599 599 405 223 182 270 127 143 Total New Trips 1,197 599 599 405 223 182 270 127 143 Based on the trip generation rates provided by ITE, the project is estimated to generate 1,197 trips in a 24‐hour period during a typical weekday. Of those, 405 will occur during the AM peak hour and 270 will occur during the PM peak hour of the school. St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 12 Pass‐By Trips According to ACHD 7106.5.5, “Land use activities such as retail, office, and grocery stores generally attract trips to that land use specifically.” Due to the nature of this project, it is not anticipated that this project will have any pass‐by trips. Internal Trips Internal trips are generally used at multi‐use developments. Due to the nature of this project, it is not anticipated that this project will have any internal trips. Trip Distribution and Assignment The new trips estimated to be generated from the proposed project were distributed onto the roadway network based on the proposed site access locations, existing turning movements, existing traffic patterns, and proximity to major roadways. In addition, the Holy Apostles Catholic Church provided survey information from its parishioners that was used to determine the trip distribution of potential students. The survey resulted in an estimation of how many parishioners would enroll their children in school and where they lived. The survey showed which zip codes the majority of the students would come from, and is represented in Figure 7. Based on this data and the other factors described above, approximately half of the trips were determined to come from the south, with the majority of the remaining trips coming from the east and west. The trip distribution is shown in Figure 8. The trips assigned to the roadway system are shown in Figure 9. St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 13 Figure 7: Student Distribution by Zip Code 25% 43% 18% 14% Project Location St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 14 Figure 8: Trip Distribution 20% 30% 48% 2% SCALE: DATE: St Ignatius Elementary School Project Traffic Traffic Volumes FIGURE 9 N/A 03/2016 2162 WEST GROVE PARKWAY SUITE #400 PLEASANT GROVE, UT. 84062 (801) 763-5100 1 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 2 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 3 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 4 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 1 3 2 4Chinden Blvd Me r i d i a n R o a d Holy Apostles Entrance Ri o V i s t a W a y No r t h A c c e s s 5 5 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR School Access St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 16 Non‐Site Traffic Projections The growth in this area should consist of the growth of background traffic (2%) and the additional trips generated by the project. No other sources of traffic are known at this point. There are a few open housing projects that are under construction in the immediate vicinity of this project. However, they are not substantial enough to modify the 2% annual growth rate and would be considered to be part of the 2% annual traffic increase. Total Traffic Projected opening day traffic with project traffic added is shown in Figure 10. SCALE: DATE: St Ignatius Elementary School Opening Day Plus Project Traffic Volumes FIGURE 10 N/A 03/2016 2162 WEST GROVE PARKWAY SUITE #400 PLEASANT GROVE, UT. 84062 (801) 763-5100 1 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 2 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 3 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 4 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 1 3 2 4Chinden Blvd Me r i d i a n R o a d Holy Apostles Entrance Ri o V i s t a W a y No r t h A c c e s s 5 5 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR School Access St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 18 Traffic Analysis Driveways and Other Access Points to ACHD and ITD System The project will use one existing access onto Chinden Boulevard and two existing accesses onto Meridian Road. In addition, there will be a new access onto Meridian Road between the existing two. Access spacing is discussed below in the Access Control on Adjacent Highways section. Level of Service Analysis Project traffic was added to opening day background traffic, and delay and LOS were evaluated as they were in previous scenarios, as summarized in Table 6, which compares conditions before and after the project is added. All intersections operate with V/C ratios above the LOS D threshold of 0.90. The access on Chinden Boulevard continues to have high delays due to the delays on northbound lefts, but the V/C remains low at 0.08 for that movement. This access may effectively function as a right‐in/right‐out due to the high delays. The eastbound movement at the Chinden/Meridian intersection has high delays nearing the 0.90 V/C threshold. Using the HCM method this intersection is at a LOS F due to the shared eastbound thru‐right volumes. To reduce this delay a right‐turn pocket may be considered in the future as volumes approach the 1.0 V/C threshold. Adding an eastbound right‐turn pocket would improve the LOS from F to E. Table 6: Opening Day + Project Peak Hour Intersection Operations Intersection AM Peak hour PM Peak hour Control Delay (sec/veh) LOS V/C Ratio Control Delay (sec/veh) LOS V/C Ratio Opening Day Conditions (Background Traffic) Meridian Rd./Chinden Blvd. 75.3 E 0.778 54.9 D 0.704 Meridian Rd./Holy Apostles Church 15.1 C 0.000 23.2 C 0.151 Meridian Rd./Rio Vista Way 13.0 B 0.000 12.4 B 0.002 Chinden Blvd./North Access 38.5 D 0.000 54.4 F 0.027 Opening Day Conditions (Background Plus Project Traffic) Meridian Rd./Chinden Blvd. 92.9 F 0.888 70.4 E 0.768 Meridian Rd./Holy Apostles Church 22.2 C 0.164 31.9 D 0.315 Meridian Rd./Rio Vista Way 17.0 C 0.082 15.5 B 0.054 Meridian Rd./School Access 16.2 C 0.103 17.7 C 0.093 Chinden Blvd./North Access 51.1 F 0.049 64.4 F 0.076 *Control delay for unsignalized intersections shown for the worst approach only per the HCM. Traffic Safety There are no immediate traffic safety issues within the project area. However, the shared nursery access on Chinden may need to be monitored for safety to do possible left‐turn exiting movements. Traffic safety issues are also discussed below in the School Site Checklist. Traffic Control Needs All additional traffic control needs are discussed below in the School Site Checklist. St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 19 Phasing Analyses No major improvements are necessary during the timeframe of this study. Internal Project Site Circulation Projected Traffic on Internal Streets There are no public streets contained in the development. All internal streets are private. Most internal traffic in this development will occur during the AM and PM peak periods when drivers are dropping off and picking up students. This traffic should be accommodated by the drop off and pick up lanes within the development. There are multiple accesses for drivers to use as well. Faculty and other visitors will be able to use the same roads and use the parking that will be available near Meridian Road. Conflict Points Sight Distance The new school access should have adequate sight distance in both the northern and southern directions. There is nothing that may affect sight distance when looking to the south from the new access, as shown in Figure 11. There are some trees when looking to the north, but they should be far enough back that they shouldn’t greatly affect sight distance, as shown in Figure 12. These trees and any other vegetation or signage should be maintained such that sight distance is not affected. Figure 11: Meridian Road Southbound Figure 12: Meridian Road Northbound St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 20 Building Access Delivery Points There will be access delivery points at the rear of the school. Drive‐Through Lanes There are drop‐off zones in front of the school with curbs on the right side. Vehicles using these lanes will be able to circulate through the site and exit at multiple accesses. Vehicle/Vehicle, Vehicle/Pedestrian Vehicle/vehicle conflicts may occur at parking aisles and where driveways intersect with other lanes, such as drop‐off lanes, within the development. Vehicle/pedestrian conflicts may occur at the crosswalk at the primary driveway and the other crosswalks within the site. Details of where these conflicts and crosswalks are located may be found in the site plan (Figure 3). The main crosswalk at the entrance to the school and connects the church to the north will be a raised intersection. Design Features Widths of Internal Roadways and Turning Radii The width of primary internal roadways varies from 22 feet to 32 feet. Turning radii are not included on the current site plan. Parking Dimensions There will be 60 new parking stalls built in the southwest corner of the new development. In addition to the new parking, there is existing parking at the Holy Apostles Catholic Church to the north. Driveway Stacking The 95th‐percentile queue length for any of the driveways occurs during the PM peak period after project traffic is added and is approximately 32 feet. This should not be an issue. Internal Circulation Internal circulation is improved through three accesses to the project from Meridian Road and multiple drive aisles and drop‐off zones near the school. Other Features Fire Lanes Fire trucks will be able to access the rear of the school through gates that will not be open to the general public. Delivery Truck Circulation Delivery trucks will arrive outside of the AM/PM peak hours to reduce congestion and pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 21 Conclusions and Recommendations  The project is estimated to generate 1,197 vehicles per day based on 450 students at a private school (K‐8). 405 of these trips are estimated to take place during the AM peak hour while 270 of them are estimated to take place during the PM peak hour.  All study intersections operate with a V/C ratio below the LOS D threshold of 0.90 and continue to do so after growing background traffic to account for future growth.  Adding project traffic increases delay throughout the study area; however, all intersections continue to operate with a V/C ratio below the LOS D threshold of 0.90.  No operational mitigation is currently required. However, as the school increases its student population and background traffic increases, it is likely the Chinden/Meridian intersection will need to be improved through adding turn lanes or extra thru lanes.  A northbound right turn lane into the proposed new school access is warranted per ACHD guidelines. St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 22 School Site Checklist In accordance with Idaho Code 67‐6519(3), ACHD requires an analysis of 22 items. These items are addressed below. 1.Land Use Master Plan The land use plan for the project is shown below in Figure 13. As previously discussed, the primary component of this project is the school, located towards the south of the map. Parking, playing areas, and empty space comprise most of the rest of the area. 2.School Bus Plan Since this is a private Catholic school, students will be attending from various locations throughout the surrounding area, as shown in Figure 7 previously shown above. As such, there will be no school buses provided for this school. Figure 13: Land Use Master Plan St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 23 3. Access Safety The new access has been designed to promote safety. Some of the key features are:  No horizontal curvatures exist that would obstruct vision.  No vertical curvatures exist that would obstruct vision.  The sight distance, as discussed in a previous section, is sufficient in both the northbound and southbound directions.  The throat length is over 150 feet, which provides enough distance between vehicles turning into the development and the internal roadways, and also provides enough distance for vehicles to queue while waiting to access the drop off lane without blocking the driveway.  A crosswalk will be provided to cross the driveway.  Sidewalks and ADA ramps will be provided. 4. Pedestrian Plan Pedestrians will be able to enter/exit the study area via sidewalks located on the north end of Meridian Road on the east side of the street, in addition to two sidewalks that lead to the south, one along Meridian Road and one just east of that. These routes are illustrated in Figure 14. 5. Crossing Guard Plan Crossing guards are generally required when there are large numbers of students using a crosswalk in areas with high amounts of traffic. As previously discussed and shown in Figure 7, survey results indicate that these students will be coming from various locations in the surrounding area. As a result, it is expected that there will be very few students walking to/from school or using the crosswalks in the area. Figure 14: Pedestrian Plan St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 24 Therefore, it is not anticipated that crossing guards will be necessary at this time. If crossing guards become necessary, guidance on adult crossing guards is available in Section 7D.02 of the MUTCD. 6.Barriers Between Highways and School The site plan, shown in Figure 3, shows the layout of the school and its relationship to Chinden Boulevard and Meridian Road. It is located such that parking provides a buffer to the north and west towards Chinden Boulevard and Meridian Road respectively. Areas where students will be playing are located to the south and east of the school, away from the highways. 7.Location of School Zone Although the maximum number of students that will attend this school is 450, it is anticipated that there will be between 50 and 100 the initial school yar. As previously discussed and shown in Figure 7, survey results indicate that these students will be coming from various locations in the surrounding area. As a result, it is expected that there will be very few students that will be walking in the area. Therefore, it is not anticipated that a school zone will be needed at this time. 8.Need for Flashing Beacon The MUTCD, Chapter 4L discusses the use of flashing beacons. They are generally used to provide traffic control when used as an intersection control beacon or to provide warning when used in other applications. According to Section 4L.04, speed limit sign beacons may be in included within the border of a school speed limit sign. There is no planned speed limit change for this school, so no flashing beacon is required for this purpose. This school also lacks midblock crosswalks, or an obstruction in or immediately adjacent to the roadway, which are other uses for flashing beacons. It is not likely that a flashing beacon will be needed for this school unless a school zone is created in the future. 9.Need for Traffic Control Signal All intersections in the study area were analyzed both before and after full build‐out of the 450 student school. Before the project traffic is added, all intersections, with the exception of the access on Chinden Boulevard, operate at an acceptable LOS, as shown in Table 2 and Table 5. The reason for the unacceptable LOS at the access on Chinden Boulevard is the northbound lefts crossing the high volumes of traffic on Chinden Boulevard. The V/C ratio for that movement remains low (0.08) during the PM peak hour even after project traffic is added. Drivers will notice if delays become excessive and will avoid that movement, causing the access to function as a right‐in/right‐out access. The overall low volumes, the proximity to the signal at Meridian Road/Chinden Boulevard, and the availability of other accesses make a signal at this access unwarranted. 10. Anticipated Future Improvements Chinden Boulevard is expected to be widened into a multi‐lane expressway at some point in the future. The school was constructed away from the road so that there would be sufficient room for this to occur. Meridian Road is also anticipated to become a three‐lane roadway throughout the study area with improvements made to the cross‐section throughout. These improvements include a 5 foot wide detached sidewalk and 3 foot gravel shoulders with possible bike lanes. At the access on Chinden Boulevard, the eastbound approach has a paved area that functions as a tapered right turn, as shown in Figure 15. St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 25 A representation of a tapered right turn provided by ACHD is shown in Figure 16. This allows vehicles turning right into the access from Chinden to be less of an obstruction to through traffic. Figure 16: Chinden Blvd./North Access EBR Tapered Right Turn Figure 15: ACHD Right Turns St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 26 11. Speed on Adjacent Highways Speed data from ITD’s ATR #159, which is on Chinden Boulevard, 433 ft. west of McDermott Road, was used to analyze speed in the area. Data from 2015 shows that the 85th percentile speed on the roadway was 59 mph for every month with data available. This speed is near the posted speed limit of 55 mph but is still slightly higher. 12. Traffic Volumes on Adjacent Highways AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the highways adjacent to the study area were collected in March of 2016 by Horrocks Engineers. These volumes, in addition to volumes grown to anticipated opening day volumes, are shown for each segment of the roadways in Figure 17. 13. Effect Upon the Highway’s Level of Service LOS is determined based on the AM and PM volumes and the type of road. ACHD provides guidelines to determine the LOS, shown in Table 5. According to Compass’s “2040 Functional Class Map”, Chinden Road is an expressway. There are no guidelines for the LOS of expressways. Meridian Road is a minor arterial Figure 17: Traffic Volumes on Adjacent Highways Existing: AM: 1502 PM: 1687 Opening Day: AM: 1532 PM: 1721 Existing: AM: 1541 PM: 1752 Opening Day: AM: 1572 PM: 1787 Existing: AM: 512 PM: 473 Opening Day: AM: 522 PM: 482 Existing: AM: 382 PM: 496 Opening Day: AM: 390 PM: 506 St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 27 with one lane and a channelized left‐turn lane towards the north, with no left‐turn lane towards the south. The LOS values for both of these sections of road were applied to the volumes above and the LOS values, which are all greater than LOS D, are shown in Figure 18. Table 7: ACHD Highway LOS St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 28 Figure 18: Roadway Segment LOS Existing: AM: >D PM: >D Opening Day: AM: >D PM: >D Existing: AM: >D PM: >D Opening Day: AM: >D PM: >D Minor Arterial Median‐Controlled, Channelized LT Lane 1 Lane Minor Arterial No LT Lane 1 Lane St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 29 14. Need for Acceleration or Deceleration Lanes ACHD 7100 provides left‐turn and right‐turn guidelines for two‐lane roads. Figure 19 shows the left‐turn plot with the Rio Vista access on Meridian Road plotted. The other two accesses on Meridian Way were not plotted since they already have southbound left‐turn lanes. Using the 5% left‐turn plot, neither the AM nor PM peak hours warrant a left‐turn lane. Figure 20 shows the right‐turn warrant plot for the church access and the new school access. The Rio Vista access was not plotted since it already has a right‐turn lane. The plot shows that a right‐turn lane is warranted at the new school access during the AM peak hour. The access on Chinden Boulevard was not plotted for either case since it is not anticipated to be a long‐ term full‐access driveway. Figure 19: Left‐Turn Lane Guidelines for Two‐Lane Roads, 45 mph Rio Vista Access St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 30 15. Internal Traffic Circulation Traffic will enter and exit primarily through the three accesses on Meridian Road, in addition to the access on Chinden Boulevard. Traffic will then circulate through the development as the arrows indicate in the site plan (Figure 3). 16. Anticipated Development on Surrounding Undeveloped Parcels Most of the surrounding area has been developed. Much of the open space to the south and east of the church near the study area will be developed into the current project. There is some additional open space to the west that may be developed into residential areas. The growth expected in these areas is accounted for by the growth rate used for the opening day scenario. The surrounding area is shown in Figure 21. Figure 20: Right‐Turn Lane Guidelines for Two‐Lane Roadways Church Access New School Access St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 31 17. Zoning in the Vicinity Zoning in the vicinity is shown in Figure 22, with the site highlighted. Figure 21: Surrounding Area St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 32 18. Access Control on Adjacent Highways ACHD has several access management standards that a new development must meet. The pertinent requirements for this project are taken from ACHD’s Section 7200. 7205.4.4 states that there should only be one driveway on an arterial unless one or more of the following conditions are met: The daily volume using one driveway exceeds 5,000 vehicles (total volume for entering and exiting traffic). Traffic using one driveway exceeds the volume to capacity ratio (v/c) equal to or greater than 1, of a STOP controlled intersection during either the peak hour of the street or the peak hour of the site traffic generation. A District approved traffic impact study and analysis determines that conditions warrant additional driveways. This development has one existing shared access on Chinden Boulevard and one new access on Meridian Road, in addition to two existing shared accesses on Meridian Boulevard. For these accesses on Meridian Road, Table 8 from ACHD, was used to determine the required spacing. Figure 22: Zoning in the Vicinity St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 33 Since Meridian Road is a Minor Arterial with a speed limit of 45 mph, 380 feet is the required distance between driveways on this road. Figure 23 shows the spacing on the road, with accesses labeled for convenience. The measured distances show distances between A1/A2 and A2/A3 are less than the required 380 feet. However, the school access is located so that it can be aligned with the access on the west side of Meridian Road. Having this alignment will benefit traffic operation in the area by pulling traffic away from the Chinden Boulevard intersection. A2 is the primary access for school while A1 is the primary access for the church on Sundays during off‐peak times. Table 8: ACHD Access Spacing on Minor Arterials St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 34 19. Required Striping and Signing Modifications If a northbound right‐turn lane is added to the new access on Meridian Road, since it is warranted, striping will be required to add the additional lane. It is anticipated that improvements will be made on Meridian Road in the near future, so additional striping and modifications will be made at that point. 20. Funding of Highway Improvements to Accommodate Development Funding for highway the right turn lane into the school would be funded by the developer. The future widening of Meridian Road will be funded through ACHD. 21. Proposed Highway Projects in the Vicinity As previously mentioned, Chinden Boulevard is expected to be widened into a multi‐lane expressway at some point in the future. Meridian Road is also anticipated to become a three‐lane roadway throughout the study area with improvements made to the cross‐section throughout. These improvements include a 430’ 220’ 300’ Figure 23: Spacing on Meridian Road A1 A2 A3 St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 35 5 foot wide detached sidewalk and 3 foot gravel shoulders. Table 9 shows ACHD’s capital improvements plan for 2022‐2026, with Meridian Road’s improvement highlighted. Figure 24 shows the transportation improvement program for fiscal years 2016‐2020, with improvements shown for Chinden Road in 2020. Table 9: ACHD CIP 2022‐2026 Nampa Caldwell Parma Notus Middleton GreenleafWilder Melba Kuna Meridian Garden City Boise Star Eagle Cherry Ln C a n A d a G l e n w o o d Locust Hwy 44 G a r r i t y B l v d F a r m w a y Melba V i s t a A v e E a g l e R d Hwy 19 Ustick Missouri H w y 9 5 1 2 t h A v e R i m R d WarmSprings A v e P ar k Center Hwy 44 L i n d e r R d UstickUstick Front Fairview Ave Locust Franklin Rd Chinden Blvd Hwy20/26 Oasis B r o a d w a y A v e Kuna Rd F r a n k l i n B l v d E m m e t t Amity Rd Lake Hazel Kuna-Mora Rd Federal W a y C a n -A d a Hwy 55 CaldwellBlvd H w y 2 1 H w y 5 5 Old H w y 3 0 M i d d l e t o n R d O r c h a r d S t Lake Shore H w y 4 5 C o l e R d T e n M i l e F a r n e r M c D e r m o t t R d Marsing Bowmont Amity Ave Hwy 20/26 Goodson C o l e R d H w y 1 6 Hwy 20/26 P e r c h L i n d e r R d W a g n e r Lincoln State St LakeShore F i v e M i l e Floating Feather King Rd Hubbard Rd S e a m a n s G u l c h C l o v e r d a l e R d P l e a s a n t V a l l e y BoiseAve Deer Flat Rd Orchard Lone Star State St Pine Ave MainSt Ba seline Greenhurst R o b i n s o n Beacon Light H i l l R d M i d l a n d L a k e A v e M i d w a y I n d i a n a Baker Ferry E a g l e R d TenMileCreek S t a t e L i n e Purple Sage Rd D u f f Deer FlatR d Lowe ll Rd C u r t i s R d E ChicagoSt E l P a s o Linden Lewis McMillan Rd Amity Rd Kuna Rd Linden S t a r R d N o t u s DryCr e e k R d A l l e n d a l e EGowenRd Lewis W a m s t a d Ustick Melmont Rd Market Hill R d Victory Rd Red Top B o g u s B a s in M a p l e G r o v e 1 0 t h A v e Hwy 18 C l o v e r d a l e R d M a l t R d 3 6 t h S t L a t a h S t Homedale Boise River L o c u s t G r o v e §¨¦I-84 §¨¦I-84 §¨¦I-84 §¨¦I-84 §¨¦I-84 H w y 9 5 T e n M i l e R d 13916 12886 13055 18954 18838 13494 ORN19552 ORN19550ORN19387 ORN19553 13917 13387 13389 13934 13052 13905 RD213-16 19047 13514 RD202-37 RD207-33 RD207-16 12368 RD202-35 18717 13054 12048 13349 13921 18895 13927 ORN19657 ORN19619 13931 13937 13923 ORN19610 ORN19618 13928ORN1930913964 13466 ORN19608ORN19362 ORN19613 ORN19616 13463 ORN19614 ORN19364 13467 ORN19363 13487 13025 13033 13484 13486 13492 13475 13481 18702 18702 18702 19065 18867 18950 ORN19446 ORN19446 ORN19446 ORN19649 ORN19648 18841 18872 19111 1885218830 18830 1877918779 18779 18787 19008 19008 19008 14344 13913 13941 12383 ORN19551 ORN19312 ¯ Transportation Improvement Program Construction ProjectsFiscal Years 2016-2020Current as of July 17, 2015 Non-construction projects are not shown on the map and can be found in the detailed report list. Low income areas are calculated for each census tract using the 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-year data; the most recent data available at the time of publication. Minority areas are calculated using the 2010 Decennial Census, which allows for the analysis of block groups (smaller than census tracts). Income information is not available from the 2010 Decennial Census. Low income areas maintain a median household income that is 60 percent of the median household income of the respective county. Minority areas maintain at least 30 percent of the population that is Non-white or Hispanic. 0 5.52.75 Miles Construction Year "PD City Limits Minority Consideration Area Low Income Consideration Area "2016 "2017 "2018 "2019 "2020 St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 37 22. Any Other Issues as May Be Considered to the Particular Application No other issues for this school have been observed at this time. St. Ignatius Elementary School March 18, 2016 38 Appendices % Bank 1 % Bank 2 100.0% 0.0%% Bank 3 % Bank 4 0.0% 0.0% U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h 0 4 1 7 1 1 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 1 1 9 7 4 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 6 2 6 0 0 4 4 0 1 5 3 1 0 0 0 2 8 3 7 4 0 0 7 2 0 0 1 9 0 0 2 2 6 0 1 2 1 5 3 6 0 0 1 7 1 0 2 3 9 2 5 0 0 5 7 0 1 3 8 2 1 0 0 4 2 4 9 6 0 0 6 2 2 6 1 2 1 0 2 4 4 0 1 7 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 7 0 2 9 2 4 3 0 0 7 4 0 1 0 1 4 1 5 0 0 3 9 4 9 4 1 0 6 2 0 4 2 2 0 0 2 3 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 5 4 0 1 4 1 0 2 4 0 0 4 8 0 9 6 4 0 0 1 9 4 5 3 0 U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h V e h i c l e s P e d e s t r i a n s 0 2 3 8 0 1 6 8 1 0 8 9 2 0 6 0 4 8 2 3 2 0 0 5 7 4 0 7 8 2 7 1 1 8 0 0 2 2 3 0 4 7 3 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 8 1 8 1 7 1 - 0 . 8 2 0 . 8 9 0 . 7 7 0 . 2 5 - 0 . 9 1 - 0 . 7 5 0 . 7 9 0 . 6 7 - - 0 . 8 4 - 0 . 6 7 0 . 6 8 0 . 6 9 - - 0 . 7 5 - 0 . 7 8 0 . 5 5 0 . 6 0 - - 0 . 7 6 0 . 9 2 0 . 2 5 0. 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0. 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0. 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0. 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % Tu r n i n g M o v e m e n t C o u n t R e p o r t S t u d y S u m m a r y St u d y I n f o r m a t i o n Re p o r t G e n e r a t e d U s i n g T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t C o u n t f o r A n d r o i d b y P o r t a b l e S t u d i e s . c o m Total PedestriansPeak Hour Volume 1817 Ti m e Pe r i o d Co u n t N a m e Ea s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h W e s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h N o r t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h S o u t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h me r i d i a n c h i n d e n m o r n i n g Ve r n o n R a c e h o r s e Fr i d a y , M a r c h 0 4 , 2 0 1 6 Lo c a t i o n N o t e s Pe r f o r m e d B y Da t e 7: 4 5 A M 7: 0 0 A M 7: 1 5 A M In t e r s e c t i o n U n k n o w n , m e r i d i a n i d 7: 3 0 A M Total Vehicles Ve h i c l e M o v e m e n t S u m m a r y Ea s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h % B a n k 4 Pedestrians Volume 1 Need a custom report? Contact: support@portablestudies.com PH F % B a n k 1 % B a n k 2 % B a n k 3 We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h N o r t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h Pe a k H o u r D a t a U = U T u r n L = L e f t T u r n T = T h r u R = R i g h t T u r n P1 = P e d e s t r i a n D i r e c t i o n 1 P 2 = P e d e s t r i a n D i r e c t i o n 2 Ve h = T o t a l V e h i c l e s f o r A p p r o a c h Entire Intersection Mo v e m e n t / De t a i l s So u t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h Mo v e m e n t V o l u m e % Bank 1 % Bank 2 100.0% 0.0%% Bank 3 % Bank 4 0.0% 0.0% U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h 0 7 1 4 5 1 8 0 0 1 7 0 0 3 2 2 1 8 1 2 0 0 2 6 2 0 3 1 4 2 4 0 0 5 9 0 1 4 7 9 0 0 3 0 5 2 1 0 0 1 4 1 7 3 2 7 0 0 2 1 4 0 2 0 2 1 9 1 0 0 0 2 4 9 0 1 8 6 2 4 0 0 4 8 0 1 2 7 6 0 0 2 5 5 3 6 0 0 9 1 5 4 1 9 0 0 1 8 2 0 2 9 1 6 8 1 6 0 0 2 1 3 0 2 4 1 1 1 9 0 0 5 4 0 1 8 8 6 0 0 3 2 4 8 1 0 0 5 1 5 3 2 3 0 0 1 8 1 0 3 0 1 9 4 7 0 0 2 3 1 0 4 0 1 6 5 1 0 0 1 0 7 0 1 0 8 7 0 0 2 5 5 4 4 0 U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h V e h i c l e s P e d e s t r i a n s 0 3 5 6 2 5 8 7 0 0 7 4 7 0 1 1 1 7 9 9 4 5 0 0 9 5 5 0 1 1 3 3 7 1 1 8 0 0 2 6 8 0 5 4 3 0 2 8 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 8 2 0 - 0 . 6 3 0 . 9 0 0 . 8 1 - - 0 . 8 7 - 0 . 8 7 0 . 9 1 0 . 7 0 - - 0 . 9 1 - 0 . 7 1 0 . 5 8 0 . 5 8 - - 0 . 6 3 - 0 . 7 5 0 . 9 4 0 . 7 8 - - 0 . 8 8 0 . 9 6 - 0. 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0. 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0. 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0. 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % Tu r n i n g M o v e m e n t C o u n t R e p o r t S t u d y S u m m a r y St u d y I n f o r m a t i o n Re p o r t G e n e r a t e d U s i n g T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t C o u n t f o r A n d r o i d b y P o r t a b l e S t u d i e s . c o m Total PedestriansPeak Hour Volume 2082 Ti m e Pe r i o d Co u n t N a m e Ea s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h W e s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h N o r t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h S o u t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h Me r i d i a n C h i n d e n I n t e r s e c t i o n Ve r n o n R a c e h o r s e Th u r s d a y , M a r c h 0 3 , 2 0 1 6 Lo c a t i o n N o t e s Pe r f o r m e d B y Da t e 3: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M In t e r s e c t i o n U n k n o w n , M e r i d i a n I d a h o 3: 0 0 P M Total Vehicles Ve h i c l e M o v e m e n t S u m m a r y Ea s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h % B a n k 4 Pedestrians Volume 0 Need a custom report? Contact: support@portablestudies.com PH F % B a n k 1 % B a n k 2 % B a n k 3 We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h N o r t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h Pe a k H o u r D a t a U = U T u r n L = L e f t T u r n T = T h r u R = R i g h t T u r n P1 = P e d e s t r i a n D i r e c t i o n 1 P 2 = P e d e s t r i a n D i r e c t i o n 2 Ve h = T o t a l V e h i c l e s f o r A p p r o a c h Entire Intersection Mo v e m e n t / De t a i l s So u t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h Mo v e m e n t V o l u m e % Bank 1 % Bank 2 100.0%0.0% % Bank 3 % Bank 4 0.0%0.0% U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh 0 1 41 0 0 0 42 0 0 76 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 46 0 0 64 1 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 114 0 0 1 54 0 0 0 55 0 0 97 0 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 37 0 0 96 0 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 134 0 U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh Vehicles Pedestrians 0 2 178 0 0 0 180 0 0 333 1 0 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 518 0 -0.50 0.82 ---0.82 --0.86 0.25 --0.86 ----------0.33 --0.33 0.85 - 0.0%100.0%100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100.0% 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Movement / Details Westbound Approach Movement Volume Total Vehicles Vehicle Movement Summary Southbound Approach % Bank 4 Pedestrians Volume 0 Need a custom report? Contact: support@portablestudies.com PHF % Bank 1 % Bank 2 % Bank 3 Northbound Approach Eastbound Approach Peak Hour Data U = U Turn L = Left Turn T = Thru R = Right Turn P1 = Pedestrian Direction 1 P2 = Pedestrian Direction 2 Veh = Total Vehicles for Approach Entire Intersection Location No t e s Performed By Date 8:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM Intersection Unknown, Meridian Idaho 8:00 AM Turning Movement Count Report St u d y S u m m a r y Study Information Report Generated Using Turning Movement Count for Android by PortableStudies.com Total Pedestrians Peak Hour Volume 518 Time Period Count Name Southbound Approach Northbound Approach Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Rio Vista Meridian Intersection Vernon Racehorse Tuesday, March 01, 2016 % Bank 1 % Bank 2 100.0% 0.0%% Bank 3 % Bank 4 0.0% 0.0% U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h 01 5 2 0 0 0 5 3 0 0 5 4 3 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 01 5 2 0 0 0 5 3 0 0 4 6 2 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 02 6 5 0 0 0 6 7 0 0 6 3 2 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 3 4 0 02 4 5 0 0 0 4 7 1 0 8 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 8 0 U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h U L T R P 1 P 2 V e h V e h i c l e s P e d e s t r i a n s 0 6 2 1 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 5 2 7 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 6 4 8 6 0 - 0 . 7 5 0 . 8 2 - - - 0 . 8 2 0 . 2 5 - 0 . 7 1 0 . 5 8 - - 0 . 7 2 -- - - - - - - 0. 2 5 - 0 . 6 3 - - 0 . 7 5 0 . 8 8 - 0. 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % 0. 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0. 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0. 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % Tu r n i n g M o v e m e n t C o u n t R e p o r t S t u d y S u m m a r y St u d y I n f o r m a t i o n Re p o r t G e n e r a t e d U s i n g T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t C o u n t f o r A n d r o i d b y P o r t a b l e S t u d i e s . c o m Total PedestriansPeak Hour Volume 486 Ti m e Pe r i o d Co u n t N a m e So u t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h N o r t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h W e s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Ri o V i s t a M e r i d i a n I n t e r s e c t i o n Ve r n o n R a c e h o r s e Tu e s d a y , M a r c h 0 1 , 2 0 1 6 Lo c a t i o n N o t e s Pe r f o r m e d B y Da t e 3: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M In t e r s e c t i o n U n k n o w n , M e r i d i a n I d a h o 3: 0 0 P M Total Vehicles Ve h i c l e M o v e m e n t S u m m a r y So u t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h % B a n k 4 Pedestrians Volume 0 Need a custom report? Contact: support@portablestudies.com PH F % B a n k 1 % B a n k 2 % B a n k 3 No r t h b o u n d A p p r o a c h E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Pe a k H o u r D a t a U = U T u r n L = L e f t T u r n T = T h r u R = R i g h t T u r n P1 = P e d e s t r i a n D i r e c t i o n 1 P 2 = P e d e s t r i a n D i r e c t i o n 2 Ve h = T o t a l V e h i c l e s f o r A p p r o a c h Entire Intersection Mo v e m e n t / De t a i l s We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Mo v e m e n t V o l u m e % Bank 1 % Bank 2 100.0%0.0% % Bank 3 % Bank 4 0.0%0.0% U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 8 0 0 18 0 0 68 10 0 0 78 0 4 68 0 0 0 72 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 8 0 2 102 4 0 0 108 0 4 100 0 0 0 104 220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8 0 0 14 0 0 126 2 0 0 128 0 0 144 0 0 0 144 286 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 160 0 0 0 162 0 0 104 0 0 0 104 272 0 U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh Vehicles Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 18 0 0 46 0 4 456 16 0 0 476 0 8 416 0 0 0 424 946 0 --------0.70 -0.56 --0.64 -0.50 0.71 0.40 --0.73 -0.50 0.72 ---0.74 0.83 - 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%0.0% 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Movement / Details Southbound Approach Movement Volume Total Vehicles Vehicle Movement Summary Eastbound Approach % Bank 4 Pedestrians Volume 0 Need a custom report? Contact: support@portablestudies.com PHF % Bank 1 % Bank 2 % Bank 3 Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Peak Hour Data U = U Turn L = Left Turn T = Thru R = Right Turn P1 = Pedestrian Direction 1 P2 = Pedestrian Direction 2 Veh = Total Vehicles for Approach Entire Intersection Location No t e s Performed By Date 3:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM Intersection Unknown, Meridian Idaho 3:00 PM Turning Movement Count Report St u d y S u m m a r y Study Information Report Generated Using Turning Movement Count for Android by PortableStudies.com Total Pedestrians Peak Hour Volume 946 Time Period Count Name Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach St Apostles Entrance Vernon Racehorse Wednesday, March 02, 2016 % Bank 1 % Bank 2 100.0%0.0% % Bank 3 % Bank 4 0.0%0.0% U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 2 0 0 70 0 1 48 0 0 0 49 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 9 0 0 67 0 2 45 0 0 0 47 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 67 3 0 0 70 0 1 42 0 0 0 43 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 101 18 0 0 119 0 13 58 0 0 0 71 191 0 U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh U L T R P1 P2 Veh Vehicles Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 294 32 0 0 326 0 17 193 0 0 0 210 538 0 ----------0.50 --0.50 --0.73 0.44 --0.68 -0.33 0.83 ---0.74 0.70 - 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%0.0% 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Turning Movement Count Report St u d y S u m m a r y Study Information Report Generated Using Turning Movement Count for Android by PortableStudies.com Total Pedestrians Peak Hour Volume 538 Time Period Count Name Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Holy Apostles Entrance Morning Vernon Racehorse Wednesday, March 02, 2016 Location No t e s Performed By Date 8:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM Intersection Unknown, Meridian Idaho 8:00 AM Total Vehicles Vehicle Movement Summary Eastbound Approach % Bank 4 Pedestrians Volume 0 Need a custom report? Contact: support@portablestudies.com PHF % Bank 1 % Bank 2 % Bank 3 Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Peak Hour Data U = U Turn L = Left Turn T = Thru R = Right Turn P1 = Pedestrian Direction 1 P2 = Pedestrian Direction 2 Veh = Total Vehicles for Approach Entire Intersection Movement / Details Southbound Approach Movement Volume SSOHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP U G P U G P UGP UGP UGP UGP W WW G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R G I R R GI R R GIRRGIRRGIRRGIRR IRR E E IRR I R R GIRR EPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPTWSWVWVWVIRRIRR X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X W GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX P/L P/L P/LP/LP/L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P/L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L P / L 34 2 1 34 2 1 34 2 1 U P 12 4 3 5 7 6 8 10 9 34 2 1 J H D F E I G K M O U P N L Q S V R T B X Z Y W A C X X X X X X X X X X X X X 48''GIRR GIRRGIRR 4''SS X X Meridian Rd.W. Director St. 9'19'19'32'24' 22'10' 8' 25' 26' 6' 2 8 ' 14'25' 1 1 2 2 34 6 9 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19' 4' 26' 10' 6 7 1 3 1 2 26.15'25' 1 8 14 1 5 5 5 M a t e r i a l L e g e n d 1 . P R I M A R Y D R O P O F F L A N E . 2 . S E C O N D A R Y D R O P O F F L A N E . 3 . S T . I G N A T I U S S C H O O L M O N U M E N T S I G N . 4 . N E W P A R E N T / T E A C H E R P A R K I N G . 6 0 S T A L L S . 5 . F I R E T R U C K A C C E S S R O U T E . 6 . O U T D O O R C L A S S R O O M A R E A / S O C I A L G A T H E R I N G A R E A . 7 . W E S T P L A Y G R O U N D A R E A . 8 . E A S T P L A Y G R O U N D A R E A . 9 . P L A Y F I E L D . 1 0 . T R A S H E N C L O S U R E L O C A T I O N . S I Z E D F O R O N E T R A S H D U M P S T E R A N D O N E R E C Y C L I N G D U M P S T E R . 1 1 . E X I S T I N G C H U R C H P A R K I N G . A P P R O X I M A T E L Y 3 6 2 S T A L L S . 1 2 . R E T A I N A N D P R O T E C T E X I S T I N G G R A V E L P A R K I N G . 1 3 . F L A G P O L E . 1 4 . E L E C T R I C R E A D E R B O A R D . B Y A R C H I T E C T . 1 5 . F U T U R E B U I L D I N G E X P A N S I O N . N O T P A R T O F B A S E B I D . K e y n o t e s N o t e s : 3 ' D E C O R A T I V E F E N C E L A N D S C A P E B O U L D E R S 5 ' C H A I N L I N K F E N C E 6 ' C H A I N L I N K F E N C E ( B I D A L T E R N A T E A ) 5 ' D E C O R A T I V E F E N C E X X S I T E S I G N A G E P R O P O S E D P R O P E R T Y L I N E P / L P / L HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " = 4 0 ' Site Pl a n 4 0 ' 8 0 ' 0 D R A W N B Y | R E V I S I O N S © | A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D ® ST. IGNATIUS SCHOOL HOLY APOSTLES CATHOLIC CHURCH MERIDIAN, IDAHO A N N E X A T I O N R E Z O N E 0 3 . 0 1 . 2 0 1 6 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - PRELIMINARY DESIGN 2 0 1 5 T L G P N : 1 1 5 2 1 0 C O N S T R U C T I O N N O T F O R C 2 . 0 0 S i t e P l a n Version 4.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Existing AM.pdf Scenario 1: Existing AMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. E38.40.000NB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopChinden Blvd/North Access5 B12.90.000WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 B14.90.000WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance2 D51.60.688NB RightHCM 2010SignalizedMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.688Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 51.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00200.00100.00100.00200.0020.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 355246574871255434511282985Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 9131161821861481332721Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 324826068801235031471182778Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 324826068801235031471182778Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 08324083240192401924Split [s] 0.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 03030030300303003030Maximum Green [s] 0520052005200520Minimum Green [s] --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 3.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 150Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 28.10468.04109.341235.5840.57168.1568.79261.3950.02118.0795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.1218.724.3749.421.626.732.7510.462.004.7295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 15.61321.1160.74979.0122.5493.4238.22158.2427.7965.5950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.6212.842.4339.160.903.741.536.331.112.6250th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesYesNoNoNoYesNoYesCritical Lane Group BCEEEEDFEDLane Group LOS 17.2825.4661.3358.4058.0475.2942.77100.4163.4844.45d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.040.530.270.980.110.520.110.810.160.20X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.092.082.8623.800.9011.190.4734.311.771.12d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 17.1823.3858.4834.6057.1464.1142.3066.0961.7143.34d1, Uniform Delay [s] 834981237968237168468158186415c, Capacity [veh/h] 1583186317741837177416811600158318631569s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.020.280.040.510.010.050.030.080.020.05(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.530.530.130.530.130.100.260.100.100.26g / C, Green / Cycle 79792079201539151539g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.000.002.002.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] RCLCLCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 58.40 58.4058.04 61.33 17.2825.4675.2944.45 63.48d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]75.29100.41 42.77 E EE BECEEMovement LOS D EFD 58.39 28.74d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]63.3676.33 E CApproach LOS E E 51.57d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] DIntersection LOS 0.688Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8765Ring 2 ------------4321Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 30.00100.00100.00110.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 100100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 302762446420Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1069611105Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.70000.70000.70000.70000.70000.7000Peak Hour Factor 201931732294Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 201931732294Base Volume Input [veh/h] Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.30d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.890.670.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.370.000.001.680.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.010.000.000.070.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BBAAAAMovement LOS 10.8914.940.008.360.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.020.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00110.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 5020921392Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10521098Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.85000.85000.85000.85000.85000.8500Peak Hour Factor 4017821333Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4017821333Base Volume Input [veh/h] Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.11d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.520.080.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.580.5816.4916.490.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.020.020.660.660.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BBAAAAMovement LOS 10.5212.870.008.090.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 38.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 5: Chinden Blvd/North Access Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.0050.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 010010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 61175102230Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1532125610Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 5747596130Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5747596130Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Volumes Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with EIntersection LOS 0.08d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.120.0017.74d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.780.000.000.800.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.030.000.000.030.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] ABAACEMovement LOS 0.0010.380.000.0017.7438.45d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.010.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Existing AM.pdf Scenario 1: Existing AMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1550 Total Volume 574 Thru 7 Left Westbound 5 Right 961 Thru Eastbound 3 Right 0 Left Northbound Chinden Blvd/North Access5 Intersection NameID 518 Total Volume 4 Right 0 Left Westbound 178 Thru 2 Left Southbound 1 Right 333 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 Intersection NameID 538 Total Volume 2 Right 0 Left Westbound 193 Thru 17 Left Southbound 32 Right 294 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Intersection NameID 1817 Total Volume 32 Right 482 Thru 60 Left Westbound 68 Right 801 Thru 23 Left Eastbound 50 Right 31 Thru 47 Left Southbound 118 Right 27 Thru 78 Left Northbound Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 Intersection NameID Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Detail 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Existing AM.pdf Scenario 1: Existing AMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1550 0 0 0 - 1550 Total Volume 574 0 0 0 1.00 574 Thru 7 0 0 0 1.00 7 Left Westbound 5 0 0 0 1.00 5 Right 961 0 0 0 1.00 961 Thru Eastbound 3 0 0 0 1.00 3 Right 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Chinden Blvd/North Access 5 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 518 0 0 0 - 518 Total Volume 4 0 0 0 1.00 4 Right 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 Left Westbound 178 0 0 0 1.00 178 Thru 2 0 0 0 1.00 2 Left Southbound 1 0 0 0 1.00 1 Right 333 0 0 0 1.00 333 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way 3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 538 0 0 0 - 538 Total Volume 2 0 0 0 1.00 2 Right 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 Left Westbound 193 0 0 0 1.00 193 Thru 17 0 0 0 1.00 17 Left Southbound 32 0 0 0 1.00 32 Right 294 0 0 0 1.00 294 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 1817 0 0 0 - 1817 Total Volume 32 0 0 0 1.00 32 Right 482 0 0 0 1.00 482 Thru 60 0 0 0 1.00 60 Left Westbound 68 0 0 0 1.00 68 Right 801 0 0 0 1.00 801 Thru 23 0 0 0 1.00 23 Left Eastbound 50 0 0 0 1.00 50 Right 31 0 0 0 1.00 31 Thru 47 0 0 0 1.00 47 Left Southbound 118 0 0 0 1.00 118 Right 27 0 0 0 1.00 27 Thru 78 0 0 0 1.00 78 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd 1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Study Intersections Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Conditions Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 1: 1: Existing AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Existing PM.pdf Scenario 2: Existing PMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. F51.80.025NB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopChinden Blvd/North Access5 B12.30.002WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 C22.50.142WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance2 D52.60.690NB RightHCM 2010SignalizedMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.690Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 52.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00200.00100.00100.00200.0020.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 47832116916513629315612339118Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 12208292316397814311029Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.9600Peak Hour Factor 45799111876253528305411837113Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 45799111876253528305411837113Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 08324083240192401924Split [s] 0.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 03030030300303003030Maximum Green [s] 0520052005200520Minimum Green [s] --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 3.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 150Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 38.331046.54207.35841.6659.63111.1676.48266.0368.96169.7495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.5341.868.2933.672.394.453.0610.642.766.7995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 21.29812.76118.20635.0233.1361.7642.49161.7538.3194.3050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.8532.514.7325.401.332.471.706.471.533.7750th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesYesNoNoNoYesNoYesCritical Lane Group BDEDEEDFEDLane Group LOS 17.5452.5270.4141.4859.3570.4243.27112.2165.4246.37d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.060.940.540.860.170.390.130.860.230.30X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.1619.169.6710.811.717.210.6745.723.221.92d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 17.3833.3660.7530.6757.6363.2142.6066.4962.2044.46d1, Uniform Delay [s] 751883213864213154416143168396c, Capacity [veh/h] 1425167615971641159715451435142516761425s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.030.500.070.450.020.040.040.090.020.08(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.530.530.130.530.130.100.260.100.100.26g / C, Green / Cycle 79792079201539151539g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.000.002.002.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] RCLCLCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 41.48 41.4859.35 70.41 17.5452.5270.4246.37 65.42d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]70.42112.21 43.27 D DE BEDEEMovement LOS D EFD 42.31 52.95d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]57.3177.95 D DApproach LOS E E 52.59d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] DIntersection LOS 0.690Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8765Ring 2 ------------4321Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.142Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 22.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 30.00100.00100.00110.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 100100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 22345011019549Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5812525137Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.83000.83000.83000.83000.83000.8300Peak Hour Factor 1828416816456Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1828416816456Base Volume Input [veh/h] Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.99d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 18.430.170.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.2512.200.000.750.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.130.490.000.030.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BCAAAAMovement LOS 12.1022.530.008.620.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.040.140.010.010.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.002Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00110.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 6124378286Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10612272Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.8800Peak Hour Factor 5121467252Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5121467252Base Volume Input [veh/h] Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.23d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.180.220.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.760.7618.3218.320.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.030.030.730.730.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] ABAAAAMovement LOS 9.8312.290.007.860.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.010.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.025Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 51.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 5: Chinden Blvd/North Access Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.0050.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 010010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 10163384892Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2541121221Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 9553379782Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 9553379782Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Volumes Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with FIntersection LOS 0.14d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.030.0021.89d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.290.000.001.921.9495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.010.000.000.080.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAACFMovement LOS 0.009.590.000.0015.2451.81d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.010.020.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Existing PM.pdf Scenario 2: Existing PMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1768 Total Volume 955 Thru 3 Left Westbound 3 Right 797 Thru Eastbound 8 Right 2 Left Northbound Chinden Blvd/North Access5 Intersection NameID 485 Total Volume 5 Right 1 Left Westbound 214 Thru 6 Left Southbound 7 Right 252 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 Intersection NameID 942 Total Volume 18 Right 28 Left Westbound 416 Thru 8 Left Southbound 16 Right 456 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Intersection NameID 2082 Total Volume 45 Right 799 Thru 111 Left Westbound 87 Right 625 Thru 35 Left Eastbound 28 Right 30 Thru 54 Left Southbound 118 Right 37 Thru 113 Left Northbound Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 Intersection NameID Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Detail 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Existing PM.pdf Scenario 2: Existing PMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1768 0 0 0 - 1768 Total Volume 955 0 0 0 1.00 955 Thru 3 0 0 0 1.00 3 Left Westbound 3 0 0 0 1.00 3 Right 797 0 0 0 1.00 797 Thru Eastbound 8 0 0 0 1.00 8 Right 2 0 0 0 1.00 2 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Chinden Blvd/North Access 5 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 485 0 0 0 - 485 Total Volume 5 0 0 0 1.00 5 Right 1 0 0 0 1.00 1 Left Westbound 214 0 0 0 1.00 214 Thru 6 0 0 0 1.00 6 Left Southbound 7 0 0 0 1.00 7 Right 252 0 0 0 1.00 252 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way 3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 942 0 0 0 - 942 Total Volume 18 0 0 0 1.00 18 Right 28 0 0 0 1.00 28 Left Westbound 416 0 0 0 1.00 416 Thru 8 0 0 0 1.00 8 Left Southbound 16 0 0 0 1.00 16 Right 456 0 0 0 1.00 456 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 2082 0 0 0 - 2082 Total Volume 45 0 0 0 1.00 45 Right 799 0 0 0 1.00 799 Thru 111 0 0 0 1.00 111 Left Westbound 87 0 0 0 1.00 87 Right 625 0 0 0 1.00 625 Thru 35 0 0 0 1.00 35 Left Eastbound 28 0 0 0 1.00 28 Right 30 0 0 0 1.00 30 Thru 54 0 0 0 1.00 54 Left Southbound 118 0 0 0 1.00 118 Right 37 0 0 0 1.00 37 Thru 113 0 0 0 1.00 113 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd 1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Study Intersections Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Conditions Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 2: 2: Existing PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day + Project Traffic AM.pdf Scenario 5: Future Plus Project AMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. F51.10.049NB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopChinden Blvd/North Access5 C16.20.103WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/School Access4 C17.00.082WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 C22.20.164WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance2 F92.90.888EB ThruHCM 2010SignalizedMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.888Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 92.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00200.00100.00100.00200.0020.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 365391211079052555385316135122Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 91353027226614101340930Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 33496111988332351354914832112Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 04502916003128432Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 324826068801235031471182778Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 08124081240212402124Split [s] 0.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 03030030300303003030Maximum Green [s] 0520052005200520Minimum Green [s] --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 3.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 150Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 30.07522.84215.811883.2140.96176.9070.69358.2759.84173.2495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.2020.918.6375.331.647.082.8314.332.396.9395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 16.71365.97124.371344.3422.7698.2839.27233.0833.2496.2550th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.6714.644.9753.770.913.931.579.321.333.8550th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesYesNoNoNoYesNoYesCritical Lane Group BCEFEEDFEDLane Group LOS 18.3529.6271.51136.9858.3574.4641.56136.4962.3545.33d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.050.630.571.200.120.540.121.000.180.32X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.133.4410.56100.481.1211.650.5770.022.132.17d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 18.2226.1860.9536.5057.2362.8140.9966.4760.2243.16d1, Uniform Delay [s] 732861213845213172436162190384c, Capacity [veh/h] 1425167615971646159715181427142516761398s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.030.320.080.610.020.060.040.110.020.09(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.510.510.130.510.130.110.270.110.110.27g / C, Green / Cycle 77772077201741171741g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.000.002.002.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] RCLCLCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 136.98 136.9858.35 71.51 18.3529.6274.4645.33 62.35d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]74.46136.49 41.56 F FE BECEEMovement LOS D EFD 135.08 36.32d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]62.5293.36 F DApproach LOS F E 92.93d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] FIntersection LOS 0.888Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8765Ring 2 ------------4321Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.164Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 22.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 30.00100.00100.00110.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 100100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 44413576770479Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1110891718120Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.70000.70000.70000.70000.70000.7000Peak Hour Factor 31292504749335Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 292953301635Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 201931732294Base Volume Input [veh/h] Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with CIntersection LOS 1.91d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 16.901.390.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 6.3614.390.005.260.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.250.580.000.210.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BCAAAAMovement LOS 11.9722.200.008.780.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.080.160.000.070.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.082Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 17.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00110.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 12272891920507Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 377255127Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.85000.85000.85000.85000.85000.8500Peak Hour Factor 10232461617431Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 62364141691Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4017821333Base Volume Input [veh/h] Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.88d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.580.530.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.538.5331.1431.140.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.340.341.251.250.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BCAAAAMovement LOS 12.4516.970.008.530.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.020.080.000.020.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.103Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 16.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Meridian Rd/School Access Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 50.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 100100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach School AccessMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 31372554080389Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8964102097Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 29352403875366Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 293543387522Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 0019300337Base Volume Input [veh/h] School AccessMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with CIntersection LOS 1.54d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 13.851.140.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.908.570.002.850.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.160.340.000.110.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BCAAAAMovement LOS 11.0516.200.008.420.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.050.100.000.040.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.049Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 51.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 5: Chinden Blvd/North Access Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.0050.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 010010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 67626221078334Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1696626981Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 63524211013314Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 50171628284Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5747596630Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Volumes Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with FIntersection LOS 0.64d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.400.0024.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.003.200.000.0010.653.7895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.130.000.000.430.1595th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] ABAACFMovement LOS 0.0010.920.000.0020.7251.07d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.040.000.010.130.05V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day + Project Traffic AM.pdf Scenario 5: Future Plus Project AMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1728 Total Volume 635 Thru 24 Left Westbound 21 Right 1013 Thru Eastbound 31 Right 4 Left Northbound Chinden Blvd/North Access5 Intersection NameID 783 Total Volume 29 Right 35 Left Westbound 240 Thru 38 Left Southbound 75 Right 366 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/School Access4 Intersection NameID 743 Total Volume 10 Right 23 Left Westbound 246 Thru 16 Left Southbound 17 Right 431 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 Intersection NameID 741 Total Volume 31 Right 29 Left Westbound 250 Thru 47 Left Southbound 49 Right 335 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Intersection NameID 2021 Total Volume 33 Right 496 Thru 111 Left Westbound 98 Right 833 Thru 23 Left Eastbound 51 Right 35 Thru 49 Left Southbound 148 Right 32 Thru 112 Left Northbound Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 Intersection NameID Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Detail 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day + Project Traffic AM.pdf Scenario 5: Future Plus Project AMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 783 0 242 0 - 530 Total Volume 29 0 29 0 1.02 0 Right 35 0 35 0 1.02 0 Left Westbound 240 0 43 0 1.02 193 Thru 38 0 38 0 1.02 0 Left Southbound 75 0 75 0 1.02 0 Right 366 0 22 0 1.02 337 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/School Access 4 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 743 0 214 0 - 518 Total Volume 10 0 6 0 1.02 4 Right 23 0 23 0 1.02 0 Left Westbound 246 0 64 0 1.02 178 Thru 16 0 14 0 1.02 2 Left Southbound 17 0 16 0 1.02 1 Right 431 0 91 0 1.02 333 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way 3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 741 0 192 0 - 538 Total Volume 31 0 29 0 1.02 2 Right 29 0 29 0 1.02 0 Left Westbound 250 0 53 0 1.02 193 Thru 47 0 30 0 1.02 17 Left Southbound 49 0 16 0 1.02 32 Right 335 0 35 0 1.02 294 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 2021 0 167 0 - 1817 Total Volume 33 0 0 0 1.02 32 Right 496 0 4 0 1.02 482 Thru 111 0 50 0 1.02 60 Left Westbound 98 0 29 0 1.02 68 Right 833 0 16 0 1.02 801 Thru 23 0 0 0 1.02 23 Left Eastbound 51 0 0 0 1.02 50 Right 35 0 3 0 1.02 31 Thru 49 0 1 0 1.02 47 Left Southbound 148 0 28 0 1.02 118 Right 32 0 4 0 1.02 27 Thru 112 0 32 0 1.02 78 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd 1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 1728 0 143 0 - 1555 Total Volume 635 0 50 0 1.02 574 Thru 24 0 17 0 1.02 7 Left Westbound 21 0 16 0 1.02 5 Right 1013 0 28 0 1.02 966 Thru Eastbound 31 0 28 0 1.02 3 Right 4 0 4 0 1.02 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Chinden Blvd/North Access 5 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Study Intersections Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Conditions Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 5: 5: Future Plus Project AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day + Project Traffic PM.pdf Scenario 6: Future Plus Project PMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. F64.40.076NB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopChinden Blvd/North Access5 C17.70.093WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/School Access4 B14.50.054WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 D31.90.315WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance2 E70.40.768NB RightHCM 2010SignalizedMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.768Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 70.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00200.00100.00100.00200.0020.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 488521481096743830355714843147Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 12213372716898914371137Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.9600Peak Hour Factor 468181421056473629345514241141Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0329169003022326Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 45799111876253528305411837113Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 07724077240252402524Split [s] 0.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 03030030300303003030Maximum Green [s] 0520052005200520Minimum Green [s] --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 3.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 150Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 43.041284.08264.841089.0063.07110.1173.06272.0270.46199.5795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.7251.3610.5943.562.524.402.9210.882.827.9895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 23.91982.67160.84849.9435.0461.1740.59166.2839.14112.5750th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.9639.316.4334.001.402.451.626.651.574.5050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesYesNoNoNoYesNoYesCritical Lane Group CFEEEEDFEDLane Group LOS 20.6582.1679.2365.9859.5361.4038.7083.7358.6442.61d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.071.040.700.980.180.300.120.740.180.33X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.1943.6617.1428.091.833.510.5421.831.712.01d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 20.4538.5062.0937.9057.7157.9038.1561.9056.9340.60d1, Uniform Delay [s] 694816213796213217463200235442c, Capacity [veh/h] 1425167615971636159715501405142516761393s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.030.510.090.480.020.040.040.100.030.11(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.490.490.130.490.130.140.300.140.140.30g / C, Green / Cycle 73732073202145212145g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.000.002.002.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] RCLCLCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 65.98 65.9859.53 79.23 20.6582.1661.4042.61 58.64d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]61.4083.73 38.70 E EE CEFEEMovement LOS D EFD 65.69 78.93d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]50.7962.65 E EApproach LOS E D 70.43d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] EIntersection LOS 0.768Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8765Ring 2 ------------4321Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.315Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 31.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 30.00100.00100.00110.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 100100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 49615473030594Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 121513788148Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.83000.83000.83000.83000.83000.8300Peak Hour Factor 41514542525493Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 23223017928Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1828416816456Base Volume Input [veh/h] Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with DIntersection LOS 2.18d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 23.510.460.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.1932.000.002.420.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.331.280.000.100.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BDAAAAMovement LOS 13.0731.900.008.880.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.100.310.010.030.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.054Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00110.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 11223051618351Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 35764588Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.8800Peak Hour Factor 10192681416309Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 518508952Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5121467252Base Volume Input [veh/h] Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.78d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 13.230.400.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 5.645.6427.4427.440.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.230.231.101.100.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BBAAAAMovement LOS 10.7814.460.008.070.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.020.050.000.010.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.093Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 17.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Meridian Rd/School Access Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 50.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 100100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach School AccessMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 24295152346294Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6712961173Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 23274842243276Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 232731224314Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 0044400257Base Volume Input [veh/h] School AccessMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with CIntersection LOS 1.01d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 14.280.340.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.577.610.001.440.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.100.300.000.060.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BCAAAAMovement LOS 10.1517.700.008.010.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.030.090.010.020.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.076Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 64.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 5: Chinden Blvd/North Access Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.0050.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 010010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 10671413888325Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2673322281Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 10031312835305Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 2910922223Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 9553379782Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Volumes Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with FIntersection LOS 0.49d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.130.0023.15d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.001.420.000.007.746.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.060.000.000.310.2495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAACFMovement LOS 0.009.860.000.0016.7064.40d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.020.000.010.090.08V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day + Project Traffic PM.pdf Scenario 6: Future Plus Project PMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1898 Total Volume 1003 Thru 13 Left Westbound 12 Right 835 Thru Eastbound 30 Right 5 Left Northbound Chinden Blvd/North Access5 Intersection NameID 875 Total Volume 23 Right 27 Left Westbound 484 Thru 22 Left Southbound 43 Right 276 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/School Access4 Intersection NameID 636 Total Volume 10 Right 19 Left Westbound 268 Thru 14 Left Southbound 16 Right 309 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 Intersection NameID 1089 Total Volume 41 Right 51 Left Westbound 454 Thru 25 Left Southbound 25 Right 493 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Intersection NameID 2236 Total Volume 46 Right 818 Thru 142 Left Westbound 105 Right 647 Thru 36 Left Eastbound 29 Right 34 Thru 55 Left Southbound 142 Right 41 Thru 141 Left Northbound Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 Intersection NameID Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Detail 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day + Project Traffic PM.pdf Scenario 6: Future Plus Project PMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 875 0 160 0 - 701 Total Volume 23 0 23 0 1.02 0 Right 27 0 27 0 1.02 0 Left Westbound 484 0 31 0 1.02 444 Thru 22 0 22 0 1.02 0 Left Southbound 43 0 43 0 1.02 0 Right 276 0 14 0 1.02 257 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/School Access 4 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 636 0 142 0 - 485 Total Volume 10 0 5 0 1.02 5 Right 19 0 18 0 1.02 1 Left Westbound 268 0 50 0 1.02 214 Thru 14 0 8 0 1.02 6 Left Southbound 16 0 9 0 1.02 7 Right 309 0 52 0 1.02 252 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way 3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 1089 0 129 0 - 942 Total Volume 41 0 23 0 1.02 18 Right 51 0 22 0 1.02 28 Left Westbound 454 0 30 0 1.02 416 Thru 25 0 17 0 1.02 8 Left Southbound 25 0 9 0 1.02 16 Right 493 0 28 0 1.02 456 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 2236 0 111 0 - 2082 Total Volume 46 0 0 0 1.02 45 Right 818 0 3 0 1.02 799 Thru 142 0 29 0 1.02 111 Left Westbound 105 0 16 0 1.02 87 Right 647 0 9 0 1.02 625 Thru 36 0 0 0 1.02 35 Left Eastbound 29 0 0 0 1.02 28 Right 34 0 3 0 1.02 30 Thru 55 0 0 0 1.02 54 Left Southbound 142 0 22 0 1.02 118 Right 41 0 3 0 1.02 37 Thru 141 0 26 0 1.02 113 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd 1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 1898 0 95 0 - 1768 Total Volume 1003 0 29 0 1.02 955 Thru 13 0 10 0 1.02 3 Left Westbound 12 0 9 0 1.02 3 Right 835 0 22 0 1.02 797 Thru Eastbound 30 0 22 0 1.02 8 Right 5 0 3 0 1.02 2 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Chinden Blvd/North Access 5 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Study Intersections Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Conditions Chinden Blvd/North Access Meridian Rd/School AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 6: 6: Future Plus Project PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day Background Traffic AM.pdf Scenario 3: Future Background AMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. E40.30.000NB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopChinden Blvd/North Access5 B13.00.000WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 C15.10.000WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance2 E75.30.778NB RightHCM 2010SignalizedMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.778Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 75.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00200.00100.00100.00200.0020.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 365356675888255535521303087Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 9134171922261491333822Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 334926169817235132481202880Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 324826068801235031471182778Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 08224082240202402024Split [s] 0.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 03030030300303003030Maximum Green [s] 0520052005200520Minimum Green [s] --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 3.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 150Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 29.59510.37112.931598.2440.96174.4670.01273.6951.71121.2895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.1820.414.5263.931.646.982.8010.952.074.8595th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 16.44355.7262.741179.7022.7696.9238.89167.5528.7367.3850th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.6614.232.5147.190.913.881.566.701.152.7050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesYesNoNoNoYesNoYesCritical Lane Group BCEFEEDFEDLane Group LOS 17.8528.6062.52105.1858.3576.8242.28108.2562.9644.34d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.050.610.311.120.120.560.120.860.170.23X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.123.223.7569.181.1213.180.5742.392.021.42d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 17.7325.3858.7636.0057.2363.6441.7165.8660.9442.92d1, Uniform Delay [s] 741872213860213161432152179378c, Capacity [veh/h] 1425167615971654159715131435142516761405s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.030.320.040.580.020.060.040.090.020.06(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.520.520.130.520.130.110.270.110.110.27g / C, Green / Cycle 78782078201640161640g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.000.002.002.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] RCLCLCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 105.18 105.1858.35 62.52 17.8528.6076.8244.34 62.96d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]76.82108.25 42.28 F FE BECEEMovement LOS D EFD 103.99 31.51d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]64.1780.24 F CApproach LOS F E 75.34d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] EIntersection LOS 0.778Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8765Ring 2 ------------4321Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 15.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 30.00100.00100.00110.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 100100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 302812447429Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1070612107Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.70000.70000.70000.70000.70000.7000Peak Hour Factor 201971733300Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 201931732294Base Volume Input [veh/h] Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.30d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.960.660.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.370.000.001.690.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.010.000.000.070.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BCAAAAMovement LOS 10.9615.140.008.390.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.020.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00110.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 5021421400Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 105410100Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.85000.85000.85000.85000.85000.8500Peak Hour Factor 4018221340Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4017821333Base Volume Input [veh/h] Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.11d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.580.080.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.580.5817.1017.100.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.020.020.680.680.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BBAAAAMovement LOS 10.5813.010.008.120.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 40.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 5: Chinden Blvd/North Access Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.0050.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 010010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 62275104830Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1562126210Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 5857598530Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5747596630Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Volumes Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with EIntersection LOS 0.08d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.120.0018.20d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.800.000.000.820.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.030.000.000.030.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] ABAACEMovement LOS 0.0010.500.000.0018.2040.26d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.010.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day Background Traffic AM.pdf Scenario 3: Future Background AMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1585 Total Volume 585 Thru 7 Left Westbound 5 Right 985 Thru Eastbound 3 Right 0 Left Northbound Chinden Blvd/North Access5 Intersection NameID 529 Total Volume 4 Right 0 Left Westbound 182 Thru 2 Left Southbound 1 Right 340 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 Intersection NameID 549 Total Volume 2 Right 0 Left Westbound 197 Thru 17 Left Southbound 33 Right 300 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Intersection NameID 1854 Total Volume 33 Right 492 Thru 61 Left Westbound 69 Right 817 Thru 23 Left Eastbound 51 Right 32 Thru 48 Left Southbound 120 Right 28 Thru 80 Left Northbound Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 Intersection NameID Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Detail 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day Background Traffic AM.pdf Scenario 3: Future Background AMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1585 0 0 0 - 1555 Total Volume 585 0 0 0 1.02 574 Thru 7 0 0 0 1.02 7 Left Westbound 5 0 0 0 1.02 5 Right 985 0 0 0 1.02 966 Thru Eastbound 3 0 0 0 1.02 3 Right 0 0 0 0 1.02 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Chinden Blvd/North Access 5 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 529 0 0 0 - 518 Total Volume 4 0 0 0 1.02 4 Right 0 0 0 0 1.02 0 Left Westbound 182 0 0 0 1.02 178 Thru 2 0 0 0 1.02 2 Left Southbound 1 0 0 0 1.02 1 Right 340 0 0 0 1.02 333 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way 3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 549 0 0 0 - 538 Total Volume 2 0 0 0 1.02 2 Right 0 0 0 0 1.02 0 Left Westbound 197 0 0 0 1.02 193 Thru 17 0 0 0 1.02 17 Left Southbound 33 0 0 0 1.02 32 Right 300 0 0 0 1.02 294 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 1854 0 0 0 - 1817 Total Volume 33 0 0 0 1.02 32 Right 492 0 0 0 1.02 482 Thru 61 0 0 0 1.02 60 Left Westbound 69 0 0 0 1.02 68 Right 817 0 0 0 1.02 801 Thru 23 0 0 0 1.02 23 Left Eastbound 51 0 0 0 1.02 50 Right 32 0 0 0 1.02 31 Thru 48 0 0 0 1.02 47 Left Southbound 120 0 0 0 1.02 118 Right 28 0 0 0 1.02 27 Thru 80 0 0 0 1.02 78 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd 1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Study Intersections Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Conditions Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 3: 3: Future Background AM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day Background Traffic PM.pdf Scenario 4: Future Background PMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. F54.40.027NB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopChinden Blvd/North Access5 B12.40.002WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 C23.20.151WB LeftHCM 2010Two-way stopMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance2 D54.90.704NB RightHCM 2010SignalizedMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.704Volume to Capacity (v/c): DLevel Of Service: 54.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00200.00100.00100.00200.0020.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 48849118936653830325712540120Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 12212292316698814311030Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.96000.9600Peak Hour Factor 46815113896383629315512038115Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 45799111876253528305411837113Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdMeridian RdMeridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0100010001000100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 08324083240192401924Split [s] 0.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 03030030300303003030Maximum Green [s] 0520052005200520Minimum Green [s] --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 3.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fixed timeActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 150Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 39.171101.29210.72877.7463.07115.2977.92272.0070.81172.9795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.5744.058.4335.112.524.613.1210.882.836.9295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 21.76860.71120.65666.1135.0464.0543.29166.2739.3496.0950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.8734.434.8326.641.402.561.736.651.573.8450th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesYesNoNoNoYesNoYesCritical Lane Group BEEDEEDFEDLane Group LOS 17.5556.3370.8443.4159.5370.8943.32114.7965.5746.51d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.060.960.550.880.180.400.140.880.240.30X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.1622.2910.0112.181.837.600.6948.193.331.98d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.50k, delay calibration 17.3934.0460.8331.2357.7163.2942.6366.5962.2344.53d1, Uniform Delay [s] 751883213864213154415143168394c, Capacity [veh/h] 1425167615971641159715451435142516761424s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.030.510.070.460.020.040.040.090.020.08(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.530.530.130.530.130.100.260.100.100.26g / C, Green / Cycle 79792079201539151539g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.000.002.002.000.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] RCLCLCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 43.41 43.4159.53 70.84 17.5556.3370.8946.51 65.57d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]70.89114.79 43.32 D DE BEEEEMovement LOS D EFD 44.18 56.18d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]57.6879.13 D EApproach LOS E E 54.90d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] DIntersection LOS 0.704Intersection V/C ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8765Ring 2 ------------4321Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.151Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 23.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 30.00100.00100.00110.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 100100No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 22355111019560Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5912825140Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.83000.83000.83000.83000.83000.8300Peak Hour Factor 1829424816465Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1828416816456Base Volume Input [veh/h] Holy ApostlesMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with CIntersection LOS 1.01d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 18.970.170.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.3013.030.000.760.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.130.520.000.030.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] BCAAAAMovement LOS 12.2123.220.008.660.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.040.150.010.010.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.002Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00110.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 6124878292Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10622273Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.8800Peak Hour Factor 5121867257Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 5121467252Base Volume Input [veh/h] Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd.Meridian Rd.Name Volumes Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.23d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.230.220.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.760.7618.9018.900.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.030.030.760.760.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] ABAAAAMovement LOS 9.8712.400.007.870.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.010.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] NoFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with 0.027Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 54.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 5: Chinden Blvd/North Access Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.0050.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 010010No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] ThruLeftRightThruRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 10363386592Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2591121621Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94000.94000.94000.94000.94000.9400Peak Hour Factor 9743381382Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 9553379782Base Volume Input [veh/h] Chinden BlvdChinden BlvdSchool AccessName Volumes Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with FIntersection LOS 0.14d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.030.0022.56d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.290.000.001.962.0495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.010.000.000.080.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAACFMovement LOS 0.009.660.000.0015.4854.44d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.000.000.010.030.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Summary 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day Background Traffic PM.pdf Scenario 4: Future Background PMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1803 Total Volume 974 Thru 3 Left Westbound 3 Right 813 Thru Eastbound 8 Right 2 Left Northbound Chinden Blvd/North Access5 Intersection NameID 494 Total Volume 5 Right 1 Left Westbound 218 Thru 6 Left Southbound 7 Right 257 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way3 Intersection NameID 960 Total Volume 18 Right 29 Left Westbound 424 Thru 8 Left Southbound 16 Right 465 Thru Northbound Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Intersection NameID 2125 Total Volume 46 Right 815 Thru 113 Left Westbound 89 Right 638 Thru 36 Left Eastbound 29 Right 31 Thru 55 Left Southbound 120 Right 38 Thru 115 Left Northbound Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd1 Intersection NameID Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Detail 3/16/2016Report File: \...\Opening Day Background Traffic PM.pdf Scenario 4: Future Background PMVistro File: \...\Catholic School TIS2.vistro 1803 0 0 0 - 1768 Total Volume 974 0 0 0 1.02 955 Thru 3 0 0 0 1.02 3 Left Westbound 3 0 0 0 1.02 3 Right 813 0 0 0 1.02 797 Thru Eastbound 8 0 0 0 1.02 8 Right 2 0 0 0 1.02 2 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Chinden Blvd/North Access 5 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 494 0 0 0 - 485 Total Volume 5 0 0 0 1.02 5 Right 1 0 0 0 1.02 1 Left Westbound 218 0 0 0 1.02 214 Thru 6 0 0 0 1.02 6 Left Southbound 7 0 0 0 1.02 7 Right 257 0 0 0 1.02 252 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Rio Vista Way 3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 960 0 0 0 - 942 Total Volume 18 0 0 0 1.02 18 Right 29 0 0 0 1.02 28 Left Westbound 424 0 0 0 1.02 416 Thru 8 0 0 0 1.02 8 Left Southbound 16 0 0 0 1.02 16 Right 465 0 0 0 1.02 456 Thru Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Holy Apostles Entrance 2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 2125 0 0 0 - 2082 Total Volume 46 0 0 0 1.02 45 Right 815 0 0 0 1.02 799 Thru 113 0 0 0 1.02 111 Left Westbound 89 0 0 0 1.02 87 Right 638 0 0 0 1.02 625 Thru 36 0 0 0 1.02 35 Left Eastbound 29 0 0 0 1.02 28 Right 31 0 0 0 1.02 30 Thru 55 0 0 0 1.02 54 Left Southbound 120 0 0 0 1.02 118 Right 38 0 0 0 1.02 37 Thru 115 0 0 0 1.02 113 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Rate Final Base Meridian Rd/Chinden Blvd 1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Study Intersections Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM Version 4.00-03 Generated with Traffic Conditions Chinden Blvd/North AccessMeridian Rd/Rio Vista WayMeridian Rd/Holy Apostles EMeridian Rd/Chinden Blvd Scenario 4: 4: Future Background PM