Loading...
2009-661 Amdmt to Pathway Master PlanCITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. _ BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, HOAGLUN, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, AMENDING THE PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Meridian City Code section 2-2-3(A)(11) charges the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission with reviewing and commenting on the City's comprehensive plan as it relates to parks and recreation, and the Meridian comprehensive plan includes, by reference, the Pathways Master Plan; WHEREAS, City staff from both the Planning Department and the Parks and Recreation Department reviewed and analyzed the Pathways Master Plan, compared the information contained therein to on -the -ground conditions, determined that the Pathways Master Plan contains some outdated and/or inaccurate information, and proposed amendments to the Pathways Master Plan; WHEREAS, on March 11, 2009, by resolution, the Parks and Recreation Commission directed the Parks and Recreation Director to request that the City of Meridian City Council implement the amendments to the Pathways Master Plan as set forth in the staff report, attached to the Commission's resolution as Exhibit A thereto; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council find that it is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Meridian to implement such amendments to the Pathways Master Plan; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the amendments to the Pathways Master Plan as set forth in Exhibit A to the Commission's March 11, 2009 resolution, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, are hereby accepted and adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTEDby the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this y�da.y of 2009. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of 2009. APPROVED: OF Mew G '9yor T de Weerd r ATTEST: Fa By: _ L Jaycee AAman, City Clerk 7,j, ,�& \` yvS .90,9 T 1 g� • �. yea RESOLUTION ADOPTING PATHWAYS M13N\AMENDMENTS Page I of I EXHIBIT 1 MPR Commission Resolution —March 11, 2009 wIDIAN�-- o PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION A RESOLUTION OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, RECOMMENDING THAT THE PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN BE AMENDED. WHEREAS, Meridian City Code section 2-2-3(A)(11) charges the Commission with reviewing and commenting on the city's comprehensive plan as it relates to parks and recreation, and the Meridian comprehensive plan includes, by reference, the Pathways Master Plan; WHEREAS, City staff from the Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments have reviewed and analyzed the Pathways Master Plan, comparing the information contained therein to on -the -ground conditions, and determined that the Plan contains some outdated and/or inaccurate information, as catalogued in the staff report attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Commission finds that providing opportunities for safe, fun, interconnected foot and bicycle travel is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Meridian, and an up-to-date and accurate Pathways Master Plan is necessary to best facilitate such opportunities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Parks and Recreation Director shall request that the City of Meridian City Council implement the amendments to the Pathways Master Plan as set forth in the staff report attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. PS.�. ADOPTVD by a Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of r , 2009. APPROVED: John Nesmith, President Parks and Recreation Commission RESOLUTION OF PARKS & REc. COMMISSION - AMEND PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN PAGE I OF 1 Exhibit A UPDATE Proposed Pathway Network Revisions March 11, 2009 The Parks and Recreation Director and Planning staff have reviewed the core pathway network as outlined in the City's Pathways Master Plan. This review included an analysis of the network using GIS data, field work, and a review of recently approved developments throughout the City. Through this review, staff identified a series of revisions to the planned network and text descriptions that aim to make the Plan easier to implement, and create a more usable system in the near and long term. Staff recommends the following changes to the Meridian Pathways Master Plan for consideration by the Parks & Recreation Commission: A. MAPS A new "Pathway Network Map" will replace the existing "Pathway Alignments Map" on page 4-2 of the Plan. The new Network Map will show existing pathways, proposed pathways, micro -pathways, alternate/on-street routes, schools, parks, proposed transit stations, and the revised Area of City Impact. The new Network Map will not include bike lanes, proposed bike lanes, bike routes, or pathways proposed in other jurisdictions (as the existing map does), or "Water" (which is in the legend for the Pathway Alignments Map, but not on the map itself). Staff will also prepare new pathway -specific maps that show the vicinity of each pathway in the network. These maps will replace those throughout Chapter 4 of the Plan. The new maps will show existing pathways, proposed pathways, micro -pathways, and alternate/on-street routes that constitute each pathway. Maps will also show schools, parks, the side of a given waterway the relevant pathway segment will ultimately be on, and the revised Area of City Impact. They will not show the South Meridian Study Area (as the existing maps do) or "Water" (which is in the legend for pathway -specific maps in the adopted plan, but not on the maps themselves). B. PATHWAY SPECIFIC CHANGES 1. Five Mile a. Move Segments A — C to north side of creek (SH 16/McMillan Intersection/crossing, fewer creek crossings). Revise map and narrative. b. Segment E — "This portion of the pathway will be primarilXthe responsibility of the city..." c. Segment J runs along Eight Mile Creek; revise the map with an extension of the pathway along Five Mile Creek (and revise the narrative accordingly). The Eight Mile route creates a good tie-in to Meridian Loop/Ridenbaugh, so it should remain in the network as an unnamed pathway connection. 2. Ten Mile a. Revise narrative for Long -Term route to keep pathway on north side of creek after crossing Cherry. UPDATE - PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN REVISIONS PAGE 1 OF 4 Exhibit b. Linder crossing in Segment C should be rerouted through (roughly) Harks to run east along Franklin to Linder Intersection, then proceed south along east side of Linder to pick back up on the south side of Creek. This will result in a pathway on both sides of Linder from Franklin south to the Creek. c. Segment E — Plan proposes the pathway switch to east side of creek at Calderwood. Revise map and text to keep it on the west (there is an existing pathway south of Calderwood on west side of creek. There are also fewer homes to negotiate future connection with on west side, although structures near creek bed may be a problem on either side). Add on street alt. route south on E. 5th and southeast on Trinidad, then connect with proposed pathway across empty lot (Updike — R5672290540)(only three property owners to negotiate with rather than 12). Revise narrative accordingly. Existing pathway at Glacier Bay is on west/south side of Creek, and Cabella Creek constructed on east/north side (crossing needed to tie together). d. Segment F — Map routes Locust Grove crossing south to align with Ionia, which will necessitate an additional creek crossing further west. Revise narrative to reflect. Segment F — Locust Grove to Eagle: - New Short Term (map and text): Pathway continues south parallel to Locust Grove and cross at Wrightwood; then uses the existing pathway in Bellingham Park Sub to reconnect with the creek. - New Long Term (map and text): There are three unincorporated parcels east of Locust Grove and between Tuscany Lakes Sub and Bellingham Park Sub. When these parcels redevelop, the long term route will connect the existing pathways in Tuscany and Bellingham Park. Two waterway crossings are necessary to make the long term connection; one over Ten Mile Creek (fairly minor) and the second over the Ridenbaugh (not so minor). 3. Meridian Loop a. Segment A — New note in narrative - median breaks and ramps needed at Red Horse. b. Segment O — Revise narrative to reflect map (same as Ridenbaugh F... Bellingham... etc.). c. Segment Q — Revise narrative to cross RWT at Nola (instead of Locust Grove). d. Segment R — Narrative says to parallel South Slough west before heading north along Wingate Lane to Ustick. It should parallel Sough Slough west, then head north to intersect Ustick at Troxel (narrative revision needed). 4. Ridenbaugh a. Segment A — Start pathway on north side of creek — narrative revision needed. b. Segment B — Switch to south side at Black Cat, then add a short term route behind Acreview sub and below southern most point of canal west of Ten Mile (map and text change). Continue west to cross Ten Mile where rerouted Overland intersects. UPDATE - PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN REVISIONS PAGE 2 OF 4 Exhibit A c. Segment C — Pathway should cross Ten Mile at the Overland Intersection and continue east along the south side of the canal and on the south side of Overland. Somewhere (roughly) in the first half -mile east of Ten Mile, the pathway will cross over to the north side of the canal (use Overland crossing) and continue east to intersect Linder at around the half mile (a mid -mile collector intersecting Linder is unlikely at this location, so it may make sense to allow the pathway to parallel the canal and cross Linder wherever the canal intersects). Map and text change needed. d. Segment D — Pathway proceeds along northern edge of canal until Stoddard, then crosses to the south side of canal at Stoddard to continue east along existing pathway through Bear Creek neighborhood. The pathway crosses the canal again at Victory to connect with the existing pathway in Strada Bellissima, which proceeds east and intersects with Meridian Road. e. Segment E — The pathway begins at the intersection of Meridian and Victory, paralleling Meridian south to continue the pathway along to south side of the canal. As the pathway approaches Locust Grove it strays slightly from the canal to cross the arterial at Wrightwood and connect with an existing pathway segment in Bellingham Park Subdivision (text change needed). f. Segment F — (Same as Meridian Loop, Segment O) Segment begins at Locust Grove south of the Ridenbaugh with an existing pathway through Bellingham Park Subdivision (Phase 3). A proposed/approved pathway through Bellingham Park No. 4 will connect with another existing pathway in Messina Meadows, still on the south side of the canal. The pathway continues east to Tybalt, where a short on street segment crosses to the north side of the Ridenbaugh, and the pathway remains on that side of the canal past Victory (text change needed). 5. Rail With Trail a. Current short term option routes users north on Meridian to Broadway, then east to connection on Five Mile Creek Pathway. This on street connection should run north on Main (text change needed). 6. Nine Mile a. Segment B — Add on street Alternative Route in narrative that runs east along north side of Ustick to east side of Ten Mile, then south on Ten Mile to existing micro path on south side of creek. b. Segment C — Move pathway to south side of creek from Cherry to RWT (map and text change needed); fewer property owners, and school district owns large portion of needed connection. On street segment on Linder can run on either side of roadway (narrative revision needed — as with Eagle Island). 7. Middle Tap a. Segment B —Narrative reads "The crossing of Star is nearly 3/10 of a mile from the nearest intersection, so a mid -block crossing is recommended." This sentence should be removed. UPDATE - PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN REVISIONS PAGE 3 OF 4 Exhibit A 8. Settlers Canal a. Segments A -B — Move pathway to south side of creek to avoid a new bridge in reaching intersection of McDermott/Ustick (has to cross at Ustick) (map and text change needed). b. Segment C — Keep pathway as on street route/street-side pathway on Ustick to connect to Meridian Loop (map and text change needed). 9. Farr a. Segment A — Continue segment adjacent to Meridian south to Rumple, then proceed south east on south side of creek (map and text change needed). b. Segment B — Cross Amity and switch to opposite side of creek (segment snakes, but pathway stays on same side to Columbia)(map and text change needed). c. Segment D — Change map to reflect text (north side of canal). 10. South Slough a. Segment B — Remove the proposed pathway from Meridian to Highgate (Sweet parcel; north of lateral), and instead use existing micro path in Windham. New bridge over Creason will be needed to connect into existing pathway in Highgate (City responsibility). Pathway would continue along the north/west side of lateral until Baldwin (map and text change needed). b. Segment D — Pathway proceeds south along the west side of Eagle to River Valley. A new bridge will be necessary to cross back to the north side of the creek and the existing pathway in Redfeather Estates Sub; there is a possibility with the future extension of Tahiti (amend text to reflect map). 11. Eagle Island a. Add second connection in text from Meridian/Chinden Intersection. b. Continue connection along Linder from park past I-84. Pathway will run on west side of roadway from 1-84 to Franklin; either side of roadway from Franklin to Chateau; and east side of roadway from Chateau to the park (map and text change needed). 12. Nourse/Lemp a. Segment C — Use existing pathway/service road in Bridgetower rather than micro/on-street combo to reach Brineger parcel (40 acres) and Linder (map and text change needed). UPDATE - PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN REVISIONS PAGE 4 OF 4