Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2015-12-15
1 1 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 6:00 PM 1. Roll -Call Attendance X David Zaremba X Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Genesis Milam X Luke Cavener X Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Community Invocation by Darrell Taylor from Ten Mile Christian Church 4. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted 5. Consent Agenda Approved A. Approve Minutes of December 1, 2015 City Council PreCouncil Meeting B. Approve Minutes of December 1, 2015 City Council Meeting C. Approval of 2016 Dog Licensing Agreements (9) with Intermountain Pet Hospital, Idaho Humane Society, Linder Pet Medical, Meridian Vet Clinic, Settler's Park Vet Hospital, Sunnyside Animal Hospital, The Pet Doctor, and Treasure Valley Vet Hospital D. Approval of Task Order 10135.b to MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES for the "SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT AT GREGORY LIFT STATION - DESIGN" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $115,367.00. E. Memorandum of Agreement For Meridian Development Corporation's Contribution To Meridian Youth Farmer's Market F. Purchase Order approval for purchase of Z34122 IC Articulating Z Boom Lift from ONE SOURCE EQUIPMENT and Authorization for the Purchasing Manager to Sign the Purchase Order for the Not -To -Exceed amount of $58,500.91 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 15, 2015 — Page 1 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. G. Amended Development Agreement Baltic Place Addition - MDA (H-2015- 0006) Located at 1151 E. Kalispell Street, in the NE 1/4 of Section 18, T.3N., R.1 E. H. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law : PP 15-018 Sundial Circle Subdivision by Conger Management Group Located 2250 W. Whitelaw Drive Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Eleven (11) Single Family Residential Lots and One (1) Common Lot on Approximately 2.54 Acres in the R-4 Zoning District I. Resolution No. 15-1105: Resolution of the Parks and Recreation Commission - 2016 Pathway Priority Task List J. Resolution No. 15-1106: Resolution Adopting the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 6. Items Moved From the Consent Agenda None 7. Action Items Land Use Public Hearing Process: After the Public Hearing is opened the staff report will be presented by the assigned City planner. Following StafYs report the applicant has up to 15 minutes to present their application. Each member of the public may provide testimony up to 3 minutes or if they are representing a larger group, such as a Homeowners Association, they are allowed 10 minutes. The applicant is then allowed 10 additional minutes to respond to the public's comments. No additional public testimony is taken once the public hearing is closed. A. Request for Reconsideration by Gem State ER, LLC Located at 6168 N. Elk Ranch Lane for Bull Ranch (AZ -15-013): Annexation and Zoning of 10.06 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District, PP -15-017: Approval Consisting of Fifty (50) Building Lots and Twelve (12) Common Lots on 10.06 Acres of Land in a Proposed R-8 Zoning District Denied B. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Denial: AZ 15-013, PP 15-017 Bull Ranch Subdivision by Gem State ER, LLC Located at 6168 N. Elk Ranch Lane, in the NW 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East (Parcel # R1002730200). Request: Annexation of 10.06 Acres of Land With an R-8 Zoning District and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 48 Single - Family Residential Building Lots and 9 Common Lost on 10.06 Acres of Land. Approved C. PY 2014 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 15, 2015 — Page 2 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. D. Public Hearing: PY 2014 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) E. Resolution Number 15-1107: PY 2014 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) Continued to December 22, 2015 F. Public Hearing for Jackson Headquarters Vacation (H-2015-0028) by B & A Engineers, Inc. Located at 3410 & 3500 W. Commercial Court Continued to December 22, 2015 1. Request: Vacate a Portion (10x135.5 feet) of the 10 -Foot Wide Public Utility and Drainage Easement Located on the East Boundary of Lot 3, Block 2 and the West Boundary of Lot 4, Block 2 that is Platted with the Commerce Park Subdivision G. Public Hearing for South Meridian Annexation (H-2015-0019) by City of Meridian Located Along Amity Road, East of Linder Road, West of Eagle Road and North of Columbia Road Approved 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning (1,241.10 Acres), R-8 (10.37 Acres), Acres) Zoning Designations of 1,322.14 Acres of Land with R-4 R-15 (30.10 Acres) and C -G (40.57 H. Continued from December 1, 2015: Shelburne Subdivision No. 1 (H-2015- 0004) by Shelburne Properties, LLC Located 1/4 Mile East of S. Eagle Road and North of E. Amity Road Approved w/ Conditions Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty -Eight (48) Building Lots and Twelve (12) Common Lots on 19.42 Acres of Land in the R-4 Zoning District Public Hearing for Una Mas (H-2015-0016) by Glenn Walker, NeuDesign Architecture Located Southwest Corner of E. Ustick Road and N. Records Avenue Request: Modification to the Development Agreement to Remove the Requirement for all Building Elevations to be in Substantial Conformance with the Previously Approved Elevations J. Public Hearing for Eagle Commons at Overland (H-2015-0024) by Eagle Commons at Overland, LLC Located Northeast Corner of S. Eagle Road and E. Overland Road Continued to January 5t", 2016 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 15, 2015 — Page 3 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 1. Request: Execute a Development Agreement Required with the Annexation of the Property for the Purpose of Including a Concept Plan and Specific Provisions Relevant to the Development of the Property K. Public Hearing for Twelve Oaks Center Subdivision (H-2015-0025) by Twelve Oakes, LLC Located South Side of W. Franklin Road, Approximately 1/4 Mile West of S. Linder Road Approved 1. Request: Short Plat Approval Consisting of Four (4) Building Lots on 1.44 Acres of Land in a C -C Zoning District L. Public Hearing for TM Creek East (H-2015-0018) by SCS Brighton, LLC Located Southeast Corner of S. Ten Mile Road and W. Franklin Road Approved 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 14.93 Acres of Land with an R-40 Zoning District Request: Modification to the Development Agreement (Inst. #1140457759) for TM Creek to Include the Subject 14.93 Acre Parcel in the Agreement 2. Request: Modification to the Development Agreement (Inst. #1140457759) for TM Creek to Include the Subject 14.93 Acre Parcel in the Agreement M. Public Hearing for Calnon Properties (H-2015-0017) by Kostka & Calnon, LLC / Calnon Enterprises, LTD Located 2215 W. Franklin Road 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 55.55 Acres of Land with C -C (40.06 Acres), TN -C (5.46 Acres) and TN -R (10.03 Acres) Zoning Districts Approved w/ Conditions 2. Request: Amendment to the Future Land Use Map Contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan to Change the Land Use Designation on 40.06 Acres of Land from Medium High and High Density Residential to Mixed Use Commercial; and 15.49 Acres of Land from Medium, Medium -High and High Density Residential to Mixed Use Residential Approved w/ Conditions N. Public Hearing for UDC Text Amendment 2015 & Meridian Design Manual Revamp (H-2015-0011) by City of Meridian Planning Division Design Manual Revamp Approved/UDC Text Amendment continued and will be brought back on January 19, 2016 1. Request: Text Amendment to as follows: 1) UDC Sections: Standards; Fencing; Structure the Unified Development Code (UDC) Definitions; Residential Dimensional and Site and Multi -Family Design Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 15, 2015 — Page 4 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Standards; Common Open Space and Site Amenity Requirements; Specific Use Standards for Drinking Establishments, Flex Space and Home Occupations; Timelines for Signatures on Development Agreements; Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards and Other Miscellaneous Sections; AND 2) Reformat of the Meridian Design Manual Including Reducing Duplicate Guidelines; Removing Site Design and Transportation Related Guidelines; Emphasize Architectural Elements and Change the Name of the Design Manual to the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual 8. Department Reports A. Strategic Plan Update Moved to December 22, 2015 B. Quarterly Dashboard Discussion Moved to December 22, 2015 C. Police Department: Budget Amendment for the Purchase of a Replacement Canine to Service the Needs of the City, for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $8,000.00 Approved 9. Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 15-1666: An Ordinance (AZ 15-012 Graycliff Estates) of the City of Meridian Granting Annexation and Zoning for a Parcel of Land Containing 52.46 Acres more or less, located in the SE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise, Ada County, Idaho from RUT to R- 8 (Medium Density Residential District) and R-40 (High Density Residential District) in the Meridian City Code Approved B. Ordinance No. 15-1667: An Ordinance (RZ 13-016 DaVinci Park) for the Rezone of a Parcel of Land Being Portions of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Lot 7, Crestwood Subdivision No. 1, Located in Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of C -N (Neighborhood Business) and R-8 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning Districts in the Meridian City Code Approved Adjourned at 9:28 p.m. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 15, 2015 — Page 5 of 5 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:04 p.m., Tuesday, December 15, 2015, by Mayor Tammy Rountree. Members Present: Charlie Rountree, Keith Bird, David Zaremba, Joe Borton, Genesis Milam and Luke Cavener. Others Present: Bill Nary, Jaycee Holman, Caleb Hood, Sonya Watters, Josh Beach, Kyle Radek, Mike de St. Germain, Perry Palmer, Jake Garro and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll -call Attendance: Roll call. X David Zaremba X Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Genesis Milam X Lucas Cavener X Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: Thank you. Sorry we are starting a few minutes late, but thank you for joining us. For the record it is Tuesday, December 15th. It's four minutes after 6:00. We will start with roll call attendance, Madam Clerk. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance De Weerd: Item No. 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in the pledge to our flag. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation by Darrell Taylor from Ten Mile Christian Church De Weerd: Item No. 3 -- is Dusty here? Darrell? No. Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda De Weerd: Well, we will skip Item No. 3 and go to Item No. 4, adoption of the agenda. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: On Item 5-I, the resolution number is 15-1105. On 5-J the resolution number is 15-1106. On Item 7-E the resolution number is 15-1107 and that item has been requested to continue to December 22nd, 2015. On Item 7-J, the applicant has requested Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 2 of 70 that item to be continued to January 5th. And on Item 9-A the proposed -- or the ordinance number is 15-1666 and on 9-B the ordinance number is 15-1667. With those additions, Madam Mayor, I move we approve the agenda. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the agenda as amended. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried or as noted. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 5: Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of December 1, 2015 City Council PreCouncil Meeting B. Approve Minutes of December 1, 2015 City Council Meeting C. Approval of 2016 Dog Licensing Agreements (9) with Intermountain Pet Hospital, Idaho Humane Society, Linder Pet Medical, Meridian Vet Clinic, Settler's Park Vet Hospital, Sunnyside Animal Hospital, The Pet Doctor, and Treasure Valley Vet Hospital D. Approval of Task Order 10135.b to MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES for the "SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT AT GREGORY LIFT STATION - DESIGN" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $115,367.00. E. Memorandum of Agreement For Meridian Development Corporation's Contribution To Meridian Youth Farmer's Market F. Purchase Order approval for purchase of Z34/22 IC Articulating Z Boom Lift from ONE SOURCE EQUIPMENT and Authorization for the Purchasing Manager to Sign the Purchase Order for the Not - To -Exceed amount of $58,500.91 G. Amended Development Agreement Baltic Place Addition - MDA (H-2015-0006) Located at 1151 E. Kalispell Street, in the NE 1/4 of Section 18, T.3N., RAE. H. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law : PP 15-018 Sundial Circle Subdivision by Conger Management Group Located 2250 W. Whitelaw Drive Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Eleven (11) Single Family Residential Lots and One (1) Common Lot on Approximately 2.54 Acres in the R-4 Zoning District Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 3 of 70 I. Resolution No. 15-1105: Resolution of the Parks and Recreation Commission - 2016 Pathway Priority Task List J. Resolution No. 15-1106: Resolution Adopting the Parks and Recreation Master Plan De Weerd: Consent Agenda. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda, authorize the Clerk to Sign and the -- or the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 6: Items Moved From the Consent Agenda De Weerd: Item 6, there were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. Item 7: Action Items De Weerd: I will ask as we move into Item 7 under Action Items, is anyone here for the public hearing for Eagle Commons at Overland? Okay. Are you -- you're not the applicant. So, it has been requested by the applicant to continue this to January 5th. If you are not able to come to that public hearing, if Council agrees to continue that, we will accept your testimony tonight. Otherwise, I would invite you to stay here until we get to Item J and see what Council decides to do or tell us that you will be back here on January 5th. Okay. Thank you. A. Request for Reconsideration by Gem State ER, LLC Located at 6168 N. Elk Ranch Lane for Bull Ranch (AZ -15-013): Annexation and Zoning of 10.06 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District, PP -15-017: Approval Consisting of Fifty (50) Building Lots and Twelve (12) Common Lots on 10.06 Acres of Land in a Proposed R-8 Zoning District Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 4 of 70 De Weerd: Okay. Item 7-A. Council, in front of you you do have a letter of request for reconsideration by Gem State ER, LLC. The letter details why they would like reconsideration. Council, do you have any questions that are caused from this letter or discussion on this request for reconsideration? Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I would clarify one point on a request for consideration. De Weerd: Is your mike on? Is your mike on? Zaremba: It is on, yes. De Weerd: Okay. Zaremba: I will lean closer. And Mr. Nary can correct me if I'm going off course here, but for a request consideration, the only thing we consider tonight is whether we would like to hear this at a public hearing. We are not discussing the issue or -- De Weerd: That's correct. Zaremba: -- the merits of the issue, we are only deciding should this be rescheduled for a public hearing and I guess my question to Mr. Nary is since the decisions were made at a public hearing, would it be re -noticed for a new public hearing if we decide to reconsider? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Yes. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, excuse me, Council Member Zaremba. Yes, the rest of the ordinance requires if the Council makes that direction they will have to pay to have it renoticed. It will be set at a future date, not tonight, but based on the schedule and a new notice will be done. De Weerd: Okay. So, any further questions, comments, direction from Council? Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: My comment is I don't -- I don't believe that there has been any new relevant information provided. The information provided was information either provided or discussed in the previous hearing and I don't think any new information has been provided that wasn't provided previously. So, with that comment, Madam Mayor, I would move that we deny the request for reconsideration for the reasons I just stated. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 5 of 70 Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to deny the request for reconsideration on Item 7-A. Any discussion from Council? Madam Clerk, will you, please, call roll. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. B. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Denial: AZ 15-013, PP 15-017 Bull Ranch Subdivision by Gem State ER, LLC Located at 6168 N. Elk Ranch Lane, in the NW 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East (Parcel # R1002730200). Request: Annexation of 10.06 Acres of Land With an R-8 Zoning District and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 48 Single -Family Residential Building Lots and 9 Common Lost on 10.06 Acres of Land. De Weerd: Item 7-B is the Findings of Facts -- yes, Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we approve the Findings of Facts and Conclusion of Law for AZ 15 -013 -- Bird: Second. Rountree: --and 15-017. :3R'0 1110" - •. TOO I De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 7-B. Any discussion from Council? Madam Clerk. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. C. PY 2014 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) De Weerd: Item 7-C is program year 2014, Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report. Thank you, Sean, for joining us. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 6 of 70 Kelly: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, thanks for the opportunity to present to you this evening. Yes, it's the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report. It's a bit like a report card. It's not a report card. What it really is, though, is a self reflection in some ways for us to look back over the last year and ask ourselves did we do what we said we were going to do and, then, how well did we do that and, then, use that going forward to the next action plan cycle to make sure that we are actually taking care of those things. So, I'd like to start off with this graphic here. You have seen this in various formats and, hopefully, you have had a chance to look over the Council memo that was provided two weeks ago. This map is our low to moderate income area and what's interesting about this map and what I like about this map is that it has the concentrations of low to moderate income individuals within each block as a visual, so that you can see that and we will be using this going forward as we go through our planning phase for the action plan as well. It also shows you where the projects that were either built into the annual action plan for 2014 or amended earlier this year into that action plan. So, what did we do? To start with we have the Boys and Girls Club gym that's finally been built and it's almost finished and that's actually a really great thing, not just because it's a seven or eight year old planned project that we really want to be finished with, but it's a great facility for that agency to actually utilize and I think parks has actually -- and the city is actually taking advantage of it as well. So, that's a good completion. The February 1 date is probably going to move somewhere, but it's going to be right around that date. We also began construction of the Idaho Avenue sidewalks. We actually completed that. It happened just after the close of the fiscal year, which is my program year as well, so it says it's incomplete, but it has been completed now. As you know, last November we did complete the picnic shelter and the ADA restroom at Centennial. For our public service projects -- one thing to talk about with CATCH, they had some issues this year with us. It was the first year we got to work with them. They did not expend very much of what we allocated them and we worked with them throughout the year. They had a few things that kind of got in their way, not the least of which was an unplanned maternity leave and you might think now that's something that you can plan, but if you're sitting on an adoption list and someone calls you tomorrow -- and so our Meridian case manager was fortunate enough to be on that adoption list and get to be able to -- it was in two months. So, they didn't plan for that. We didn't plan for that. It's a great thing for them. Unfortunately, they just weren't able to work as well within that program with only one staff member. Having said that, with what they did draw down, seven homeless -- or previously homeless families were worked with within their program, six of which attained a level of self sufficiency through CATCH's program. There is some other things that happened there, too. We have our own restrictions that we place on the organizations that we work with and most of them are to be as conservative as possible, so we make sure we meet the letter of the law with HUD, but some of those things also get in the way and I think going forward this next year we are going to have some conversations about how to loosen some of those restrictions within the law to make sure that they can help more individuals and if you look you will see the amount of money that they actually spent down, which was probably ten percent of what we gave them. Think about what they could have done with the rest of that had they had the staff and we had the looser restrictions that would allow them to do that. The Meridian Food Bank, as Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 7 of 70 always, capitalizes on their uncanny ability to make use of donated dollars. The network - - the network that they have and the people that they have that they are associated with, everything from Rosauer's to Albertsons, they are just able to make a lot of use out of those dollars. Fifty-five thousand households -- or 55,000 individuals served. The Boys and Girls Club still had some money left in their 2013 scholarship program and we allowed them to use some of that, so that's 16 low income individuals that were actually able to -- families that were able to utilize that. For the financials, you can see here that CATCH still had a significant amount of their portion that didn't draw down. The asterisks -- that should be pretty clear. Those are dollars we will be able to, going forward in the next year when we consolidate or we do our next annual action plan, those are dollars that we will be able to use for future projects. We did have the community center fagade, which causes a lot of this this last year and the three projects below that on this list that have not drawn down yet. I want to make clear -- of course, it looks like nothing's happened on those projects, but I'd like to talk about those projects a little bit. Storey Park, that upgrade, we ran into a small -- small issue going through the environmental assessment that we have overcome now. The women's side of that bathroom cuts right through the flood plain -- the current flood plain and it's -- De Weerd: It has nothing to do with the women's room, though. Kelly: Madam Mayor, it does not. However, it's about, I don't know, 60 square feet and it's -- so, that caused some hoops to be jumped through and so we have done that and, hopefully, we will be moving forward with that project with Parks, excuse me, very soon. The homeowner down payment assistance project with the Housing Authority, we gave them some money for last year that they haven't been able to use yet. That's not to say they haven't tried. I have done three environmental assessments on homes for a family that's desperately trying to get into one and close. Unfortunately, they are -- the inspection versus what the seller would correct never made it past muster, so this final house they are looking to close on the 29th. So, on the 29th they should have a very good Christmas present -- maybe a little late, but for that family. And, then, our slum and blight assessment that is planned for this spring. That's my planning project for this spring. It's not the only dollars that we expended was last year's dollars, some of them were from 2013. Here is where you can see the picnic shelter and the restroom facility that we talked about in November, as well as the sidewalk -- the Idaho Avenue sidewalk project. That dollar remaining is about half of that now, so we still have some funds left over from that project, even though it's complete. So, that's more -- that's more dollars to roll forward into the next annual action plan -- annual action plan cycle. Madam Mayor, Members of Council, as of right now the city's Finance Department is reviewing the CAPER. They are trying to make sure the financials are good. The CAPER itself is mostly what I have given you and the executive summary, but there is all sorts of reports that HUD wants to make sure are done through our IDIS system, so that's what we are currently working on now. There is a few changes that we are going to be making, but they are not any part of substance, they are just making sure that it's correct. Public comment period was open on November 30th, so we will close that today. I have not received any comments as of today, so any testimony given to me today we would record and, then, we would have that, too, to send forward to HUD. Madam Mayor, requested Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 8 of 70 actions. Staff will stand for any questions Council may have at this time. Subsequent to those questions you have already continued this -- the resolution until the 22nd, which is just as well, but we just need to hold that public hearing. So, if there is any questions that you may have. De Weerd: Thank you, Sean. Council, any questions for Sean? Bird: I have none. Rountree: I have none. D. Public Hearing: PY 2014 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) De Weerd: Thank you, sir. Okay. Item 7-D is a public -- Rountree: Just a question. Open the public hearing? De Weerd: Yes. I will the open public hearing on Item 7-D for program year 2014 for our CDBG and ask if there is any members of the public who would like to provide testimony on this item? Okay. Council, any further questions for staff? Cavener: Madam Mayor, seeing no other questions -- do we keep that public hearing open, then, for another -- De Weerd: No. Cavener: We can close that? Then I move we close the public hearing on the CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report for 2014. . n11i1111+ - .. I I De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 7-D. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. E. Resolution Number 15-1107: PY 2014 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) De Weerd: Council, the resolution under 7-E has been requested to continue until next week. Do I have a motion? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 9 of 70 Bird: I move we continue proposed Resolution 15-1107 to December 22nd, 2015. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to continue Item 7-E until next week. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. F. Public Hearing for Jackson Headquarters Vacation (H-2015-0028) by B & A Engineers, Inc. Located at 3410 & 3500 W. Commercial Court 1. Request: Vacate a Portion (10x135.5 feet) of the 10 -Foot Wide Public Utility and Drainage Easement Located on the East Boundary of Lot 3, Block 2 and the West Boundary of Lot 4, Block 2 that is Platted with the Commerce Park Subdivision De Weerd: Item 7-F is a public hearing for H-2015-0028. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Beach: Thank you, Mayor and Council Members. This is a vacation for Jackson headquarters. The project site is 3410 and 3500 West Commercial Court. The applicant is requesting to vacate a portion of a ten foot by 135 and a half foot section of an existing ten foot wide public utility and drainage easement located on the east boundary of Lot 3, Block 2, and the west boundary of Lot 4, Block 2. This is platted with the Commerce Park Subdivision. The remaining public utility and drainage easement will remain along the shared property line. So, they are not requesting to vacate the entire section, just a portion. Approval of the subject vacation application will remove a portion of that easement and allow the applicant to submit for a building permit to construct an addition to their existing industrial slash office building and they have applied for their building permit, but they are waiting for this vacation to take place, so that they can move forward with that and all public utilities, which include Idaho Power, Cable One, Intermountain Gas, with the exception of CenturyLink, who did not respond to the applicant's request, have given consent to relinquish the portion of said easement. The Nampa -Meridian Irrigation District has stated that they have no jurisdiction over the easement area. Staff did ask the applicant to provide a letter from CenturyLink prior to tonight's hearing and to this point staff has not received such a letter. So, staff is recommending that we continue this public hearing to such time as the applicant can provide a letter from CenturyLink stating that they have no interest in the easement. Staff will stand for any questions. De Weerd: I guess my only question would be could Council grant the vacation and that a building permit would be held until that letter was received? Mr. Nary? Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 10 of 70 Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I don't think we have a method in our ordinance to grant conditional approval. So, you -- although it seems logical, we don't have that in our ordinance to allow for a conditional approval and, then, rely on the staff to, then, get that document. They are supposed to submit that document with the application or at least by this point. De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Nary. Any questions for staff at this time? Is the applicant here this evening? Well, hi, Joe. Canning: Hi, how are you? De Weerd: It's been awhile. Canning: It's been awhile. De Weerd: Welcome. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Canning: I can do that. My name is Joe Canning and I'm with B&A Engineers in Boise, Idaho. Address is 5505 West Franklin Road. De Weerd: Thank you. Canning: And I'm here tonight with the applicant. Scott Stom is also in the audience. I think Scott may want to address the Council also. I appreciate the Mayor's question, if this could be a conditional approval. Our first request went into CenturyLink in August of this year. We have been desperately trying to get a hold of those folks. I don't know if anyone is aware, they are in huge turmoil right now. The offices here in Boise, at least the administrative offices, have pretty much disappeared from an engineering standpoint. We have been in contact previously with folks here in Boise. We have been in contact recently with more staff in Nevada. Today we were sent to folks up in Washington. So, we are desperately trying to get this letter from CenturyLink and they are, basically, nonresponsive. A little bit of history on the easement itself. It was created by the platting of the subdivision. It's a typical size lot easement that is done in almost every plat. It shouldn't be done in every plat, but it was done in this one. Idaho Power is the only company we are aware of that has any facility in that easement and that's why this is a partial request for a vacation. We deal -- we still have to protect their existing facility that's in part of the easement. The yard we are trying to relinquish and vacate is the part where Jacksons wants to expand their headquarters and that's what's holding up this building permit at this particular point in time. So, I think there is a couple of issues here we wanted to talk about. Number one was the CenturyLink issue. We are more than happy to get that letter if they ever get it to us. It's a real problem and we are trying to chase that down and, then, additionally, I believe there is an appeal period that goes with an approval of an easement vacation. If there would be any way to release that to shorten it, something like that, would be most appreciated. Jacksons does own all the property on each side of this easement. Of course, they have quite a facility there and they would sure like to get going and I really think that's all I have to say. But we have been working Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 11 of 70 on it since August. Everyone is in compliance, except for CenturyLink. That's the Issue we have got. So, Scott, if you would like to come up. De Weerd: I think, Joe, the whole reason I asked the question is we have all been hung up by CenturyLink and so I -- I had assumed you would get up there and share the length of time you have been trying to do this. So, appreciate that. Welcome, Scott. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Stom: Yeah. My name is Scott Stom. My address is 3450 East Commercial Court, Meridian, Idaho. 83642. 1 work with Jacksons and I represent Jacksons and like Joe said, we have been held up -- well, we have been working through this project -- or this vacation issue since August. We are very anxious to move forward with our project to expand our office building. Initially we wanted to expand and what we are trying to do is connect the two buildings, part of Capital Distributing with our existing Jackson headquarters to put everything together. We had to phase the project. Phase one was actually midway through construction and we have to split out into phase two while we worked through this vacation issue. So, it was our hope tonight that we could get this approved and move forward without further delay and I would just hate to have the CenturyLink delay us from accomplishing -- or trying to do what we are trying to accomplish. I know John Jackson is excited to move forward with our project and I just -- it seems like this is a technicality that -- you know, if we can't get a hold of CenturyLink, which we have been trying to do for the last, you know, four months, I guess we -- it's just -- it's just really difficult to stomach. So, I just ask if there is any way possible that this could be approved we would sure appreciate it. And, then, like Joe said, if we can't approve this, we are looking -- I think it was in our -- in early discussions with the planning department, it seemed like it was entertained that the appeal period could be waived, because, really, what we are talking about here is an issue that's within the confines of our own property. It's not like we are opposing adjacent property owners regarding this easement or the use of this easement. There is no way for this easement to go further north, because of the irrigation canal in the way, too. So, with that said I would just also like to recommend the waiving of that appeal period as well. So, that's all I have to say. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Scott. Okay. This is a public hearing. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony on this item? Brown: For the record Kent Brown. 3161 East Springwood, Meridian, Idaho. De Weerd: Thank you. Brown: I'm doing two of these and CenturyLink is my last one on both of them. They are holding me up on those projects also. But I want to take the opportunity to also speak to -- lots of times we are asked to put these easements, which is really interesting in the fact that they never do have any facilities in them. They have an opportunity and the nine years I was with the city of Boise I never had -- very few that would respond. CenturyLink occasionally would go through a block, but, then, they don't fit within these size lot easements and so they have to be bigger. So, you would make a special effort. When Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 12 of 70 you have your single family home, for example, it's not an easement, they run the line to your house. It's a service. And so these side lot line easements rarely, if ever, have anything in them and I would like to see them go away. I tried to do that a few years ago when I was working for another engineering firm and -- and the utility companies promised that they would make a speedy turn around. Those things happen and change and those people that made those promises are no longer there, especially with CenturyLink, and just to make you understand that it -- it really does -- it takes a lot of lot effort. I'm doing these vacations and I'd almost rather do a preliminary plat and go to a neighborhood meeting and everything else, because you just can't get people to respond to you and I even sent certified mail. Well, the certified mail was in Colorado and that doesn't do you any good, because they don't respond. It goes to their corporate office and that's where it's located and so -- thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Any further testimony on this item? Council? Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: My first instinct would be to ask if their telephone service provider could be changed to something like AT&T and, then, we get the easement released from them. Or does CenturyLink have a monopoly in this area? Milam: A monopoly in this area. Zaremba: Okay. That wouldn't work. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: This is for Mr. Nary. Bill, with that easement, I mean they could -- we could approve this and let them go ahead and do it, but they could come back in ten years and still got -- I mean we don't take away the easement unless they allow it; right? Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Bird, I mean that's the problem. But there is an appeal process to do this and so I think that's really the appropriate process they need to follow. Like I said, our ordinance requires that they were supposed to submit this with the application. We do allow it to be done prior to final approval, but we still need relinquishment or we need a process to create the relinquishment, because the easement was created by the plat, which is a statutory process. So, if you simply granted this tonight and they wanted to exercise that easement, they would have a right to do that and that's a bigger mess than what we really want to deal with. So, there is an appeal process to go through to get that relinquishment, extinguish, when they won't respond and I think planning has actually discussed that with the applicant and I think they said -- and I don't recall the time period. I was trying to find it Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 13 of 70 while they were talking -- that they were talking waiving. If that's a process that we can waive, then, we can certainly do that. But I don't think -- I think we still want to follow the process to grant this, because we don't have a way to grant it conditionally. De Weerd: Well, always have new things come up. Thanks a lot. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Joe. Borton: Bill, will you say that again. It sounded as if the city grants a vacation of the easement, the easement exists for the beneficial user or CenturyLink in this case, even if it's vacated by the city, until CenturyLink actually consents to its relinquishment? Nary: Council Member Borton, either they still have the right to exercise that -- use of that easement, unless we have granted it through our process to extinguish it. Right now our initial way of extinguishing it is getting consent. If they won't consent, there is a process that they can follow to have us grant it without their consent and what I'm saying is I think that's what they need to do, rather than have you simply grant approval without following any of the processes in the code. De Weerd: So, what is that process in the code? I'm not sure I'm clear on that. Nary: Madam Mayor, that's what I was looking for. I don't know if Planning -- I don't know if Bill knows how quickly that can be accomplished. Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I'm into -- I don't remember discussing any waive of appeal period with the applicant. The way our code is structured it follows the state code and it says when these plats are created by -- or when these easements are created by a plat it needs to be vacated by getting these letters. I'm not sure of the appeal process either as far as this. Typically a vacation application does not produce findings, it produces a resolution that Legal Department prepares and it gets back on the agenda. That's where I was following that maybe the applicant thought they could save two weeks and not have to wait for the resolution to get approved and we would sign off on the building permit. So, I'm not sure what the appeal process is at this point either to explain it to you. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: What's the decision that's being appealed? You used the word appeal process. Appeal of what? Parsons: Vacations are either typically yes or no. So, I think either approval or denial. guess that's -- to me that would be the appeal if they don't like if you vote no on this, Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 14 of 70 because they don't have the information to do that, then, they would have to go through that process. I'm not that familiar with state statute to explain that to you other than -- Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, if you wouldn't mind -- I know the applicant doesn't want a delay. This is an issue that wasn't raised to us before right now, so I don't know -- no one's asked us either and we haven't ever had this come up. Usually we have always gotten these things. So, it is unusual to not get a response of any kind. If you give us a week we will work with the applicant and get this resolved, whatever we need to do with the code, to get this done, so we aren't violating any conditions of the plat and we don't create a precedent we are going to just do this when there is a problem of this type. We want to make sure we are clear about that. So, if you give us a week and put this over to next week we will get this resolved. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Short of Joe just giving me the phone number and I will call them, too. Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: If we go that direction, would it be possible for the city to send CenturyLink a certified return receipt letter that states we are about to remove this easement and if we hear no response it's over. Nary: I don't know the answer to that. So, all I'm saying if you give us a week we will get this resolved. De Weerd: Because I think we would all like to say that. Would the applicant like to respond to some of the discussion before we continue this, if that's -- do you have any response? Stom: So, again, this is Scott Stom. So, as I'm understanding it, we will take a week and how do we determine in a week if that's, you know, time to resolve it is my question. De Weerd: I guess the week allows our legal team to look into how you can do it without permission if you can and what would the process be if they never respond. I guess it's just to work with you on identifying what options we might have or if we have any at all and what the next steps would be. Stom: Correct. Yeah. If that's what we have to do -- I mean, obviously, a delay is not going to be taken too well in the upper management. John Jackson. He was anticipating to get this resolved tonight, so -- but, you know, if it takes a week I guess we need to work through that. I guess -- yeah. A week would be -- De Weerd: I guess, Scott, what we are hearing is we don't know if we even have a legal, viable option -- Stom: Right. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 15 of 70 De Weerd: -- to even give you that. Stom: Yes. De Weerd: So, that's -- that's what we are trying to identify. Stom: I understand that. So, again, in a week if we can't contact CenturyLink or we are having no luck getting a hold of them, I understand there is -- it sounds like there is still maybe a process that can be worked out to where we could move forward anyway? De Weerd: That's what we will work to identify. Stom: And that's -- that sounds fair if that's what it takes, so -- Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: At that point the week is not to give CenturyLink an additional week of time to respond. If they do, great. But the week is for us to get the process lined out and ready to take action next week to help you out and insure that it still complies with state code. Stom: Okay. Yeah. Understood. So, again, if I can reiterate, you know, three of the four utility companies didn't have an issue. You know, I think the primary one was Idaho Power. We had a tough time getting a hold of them, but we finally got that resolved, because we are, basically, vacating everything north of their transformer. So, it's just, again, you know, three of the four didn't have a problem. So, I don't know if that could be weighed in on this as well. So, just my input, but -- De Weerd: We wish that counted, because we have all been hung up by CenturyLink and we all have felt your pain. Stom: Understood. Okay. De Weerd: So, sorry. Stom: Well, thank you for working with us. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we continue the public hearing on H-2015-0028 to December 22, 2015. Milam: Second. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 16 of 70 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to continue this item to next week. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: If this process, once approved, has been done by resolution, can that be available and prepared for the same day? Nary: Yes. G. Public Hearing for South Meridian Annexation (H-2015-0019) by City of Meridian Located Along Amity Road, East of Linder Road, West of Eagle Road and North of Columbia Road Approved 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 1,322.14 Acres of Land with R-4 (1,241.10 Acres), R-8 (10.37 Acres), R-15 (30.10 Acres) and C -G (40.57 Acres) Zoning Designations De Weerd: Thank you. Item 7-G is a public hearing for South Meridian Annexation, H-2015-0019. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Hood: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. I wish this project was as exciting as a utility easement vacation, but it's not, unfortunately. It's just a small little annexation of 1,300 plus acres. So, on the screen is a vicinity map. The City of Meridian, with consent from all the subject property owners, has applied for annexation and zoning of 1,322.14 acres of land, all zoned RUT right now in Ada County. There were 1,241 of those acres proposed for the R-4 zoning district. 10.37 acres in the R-8. 30.1 acres in the R-15. And 40.57 acres in the C -G zoning district. The project contains 42 different parcels and 22 different property owners. The properties are generally located along West Amity Road, east of South Linder Road, west of South Eagle Road and north of East Columbia Road, but it does not include all of the properties within those arterial roadways. There are some county properties that will remain in the county. But a good chunk of those properties -- again, this one probably shows it better -- the ones that are the 45 degree angle highlight are the subject properties that are being annexed. But, again, it doesn't include all of those properties between those roadways I just mentioned. The properties are generally developed with rural residential properties. Some are being framed. Several of the properties have commercial, industrial type uses also operating from them. Most of the -- the property owners desire to annex, so their respective properties can be developed to urban densities at some time in the future, but there is no development proposed at this time with this application. It is just an annexation and zoning application. There are seven different comp plan future land use map designations Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 17 of 70 on the properties, but most of them are either low or medium density residential, so either the yellow or the green. Green is the low and the yellow is medium density. There are also properties that have the medium high density residential, a mixed use community, mixed use regional, mixed use nonresidential, and civic designation and I will point that one out. Right here. That's the future 77 acre park site. The subject annexation meets the eligibility requirements for a Category A annexation classification as set forth in Idaho Code Section 15-222. The subject annexation being processed in accord with -- with state code. Over the past year city staff has had several meetings and worked closely with the subject property owners to develop an annexation plan. Each property owner has submitted a consent to annex form. These written consent to annex forms have been recorded. In addition to the consent to annex form, a develop agreement was prepared by our legal staff for each property owner that addresses current uses and future development of the property. Each development agreement is customized for the owner and parceled. Some provisions within the development agreement vest owners with land uses and/or operations. They are typically allowed within the city limits. As I mentioned, again, most of these properties are rural residential in nature. Some of the properties have livestock, for instance, and we don't allow that within city limits. So, in these situations the develop agreement allows that use or uses to continue until the properties actually do develop or propose development within the city. The development agreement that each property owner has already signed will be recorded if and when the City Council approve the annexation application. So, with the Meridian Heights and Redtail and the Simplot properties to the north of the subject property, extending sewer and getting down to this area is a bit challenging. It's really kind of cost prohibitive for any one developer to take sewer from near the intersection at Victory and run it down to get down into this area here. So, this public -- public-private partnership solution gets services past that mile, allowing the orderly development of the city. A large part of the annexation plan involved an active role by our Public Works Department to insure extension of city utilities, specifically sewer and water and Warren Stewart is here if there are any questions on that. I do -- Tom was also very involved with those meetings that I mentioned previously, too. The sewer, again, is, essentially, stuck up at Victory and Meridian and there are development pressures down further to the south. There are a couple of different sewer sheds in this area and those are somewhat highlighted in this exhibit. Sewer trunks currently exist in Meridian Road and Linder Road near the Ridenbaugh Canal. Within each development agreement there is a section entitled commitments and conditions by the City of Meridian. This section outlines the advancement of sewer and water infrastructure for the benefit of the subject properties. The section explains the city's role in planning, designing, and construction of infrastructure over time. There are two phases in which the infrastructure will be installed. The first phase anticipates completion of the infrastructure in or about Meridian Road within two years of annexation. The second phase envisions infrastructure in or about Linder Road and Victory Road within four years of annexation. Additional extensions of these utilities is needed in the future. It's envisioned that the additional extension of these utilities will be done by or with developers in the future. The future development of these properties will have to adhere to the characteristics of their underlying land uses and all City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development, including any necessary utility extensions. Again, no development is proposed this evening with any of the subject properties. A more Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 18 of 70 thorough review of each individual property as it develops and their utility plans will occur once we receive a development application. The one caveat to that -- and this came up at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting -- is the 77 acre park site that I highlighted on the comp plan map. So, let me summarize a little bit some of the testimony and I will read the folks' names that were at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on November 19th. And this how the folks signed up on the sign -in sheet in back of the room. In favor Mary Taysom, Robin Willamen, Brian White, who was neutral. Carl and Bonnie Riderman. Susan Bloomberg. Kurren Ramus. And Cynthia Davis. In opposition was Ronald Galloway. Commenting was Kent Mills. Gary Hanson spoke in option. Jay Christensen, Dave Taysom, Gordon Hamilton and Aaron Raap. No written testimony was received before the Planning and Zoning Commission and I checked the clerk's laser fische late this afternoon and I didn't see that anything had been submitted in between the Planning and Zoning Commission and this meeting tonight. During the Commission meeting a couple of things were discussed. The district boundaries -- and this is something we have talked about before -- the varying lines of the boundaries between school districts, fire districts, zip codes, just different things and how they aren't all nice and smooth and don't all choose the same line for those things, but, again, the fire districts, the difference between the Kuna School District and the West Ada School District and how those lines maybe affected with annexation. Particularly schools was talked about there at Planning and Zoning Commission. And, then, also, again, the future development of a park site. Mr. Raap was at that meeting and had some concerns -- wanted to know when the appropriate time would be to comment on lighting, sounds -- he's an adjacent neighbor and wanted to know if that was the appropriate forum for those types of concerns and comments and review that master plan. I did put in -- and I see Mike Barton is here. I do know Mike contacted Mr. Rapp and spoke with him about that. I don't know the extent of those discussions, but I did at least connect parks up with him and I think that they are on the same page now, but I will let -- Mike, if you have anything to add, maybe give him a minute. So, there isn't an official spokes person for this group, Madam Mayor and City Council, but I know there are several of the property owners that are in the audience this evening and I just appreciate working with them. It's been quite the process, but they have all been real good to work with, real responsive. It's been quite the effort on both sides or all sides, but I'm happy and proud to say that we made it to this point and so with that I will stand for any questions, but maybe someone from -- some of these property owners would like to address you as well. De Weerd: Thank you, Caleb. Council, any questions for Caleb? I guess, Caleb, the applicant is the city. Hood: Correct. De Weerd: So, you just gave the applicant's report. I will open this up for public testimony. I only have one person on the sign-up sheet, Charles Wood signed up in favor. Would you like to provide testimony? Okay. Well, we will go ahead and open it up for others. Come on forward. Mr. Brown. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 19 of 70 Brown: Well, you will find my name on something then. I signed something down there, so -- De Weerd: Well, you might have signed the wrong one. Brown: Yeah. De Weerd: But welcome. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Brown: For the record my name is Kent Brown and my address is 3161 East Springwood, Meridian, Idaho. I'm speaking in behalf of Charlie Wood and -- and I know that the people are anxious and -- to be annexed and -- and it seems like when you attend the meeting -- at least when I do with my clients and we meet with staff, you hear certain things or my client hears certain things and, then, I go back and interpret what was said, because you're anxious and hopeful that that's what it is and I think the same thing is true with the development agreement and just have a few questions. I would ask, you know, for some clarification I guess on those. In section five of the development agreement -- and I didn't realize that everybody's would maybe be different, but -- at least on the one that Charlie provided to me. Section 5.1.3, it talks about any property or easements needed by the City of Meridian to provide any sewer or water infrastructure needed in furtherance of this agreement shall be provided by the owner to the city at no cost. When I read that I first was drawn to the exhibit the Caleb had on the screen that it's a sewer that the city is extending on the screen and Charlie is in the one that's supposed to be done down Meridian Road and that those would be the easements and, then, I started looking at the people that are involved and not all of those properties are in the request for annexation. The American Paving pit there at Amity and -- at the corner -- the southeast corner of Amity and Meridian Road and, then, the Simplot property that's the -- as I have always known the old chicken coops, neither one of them are in this annexation and so I --yes, I assume that the furtherance of this is for this entire area being annexed, that the owners are to provide easements, so that this can happen and what draws me to that is in 6.1 -- this is directed towards the city commitments and conditions by the City of Meridian. It is the intent of the parties in this agreement to provide for the advancement of sewer, water infrastructure, utility infrastructure for the benefit of the subject properties and the City of Meridian and adjacent and adjoining properties for the furtherance objective of the city to provide the needed infrastructure of water and sewer. So, to me I guess I'm hopeful that that's what that's saying, because we have extended sewer in the past in certain areas and, then, just because it's on someone's property we can't go get it and it sounds like -- if I'm interpreting this correctly -- Mr. Nary or Caleb -- that that's saying that the City of Meridian can request an easement to get to the adjoining properties after the sewer gets extended here and, then, I guess those that are adjoining land owners that are part of this annexation agreement can work with the city to make that -- that happen. As I understand, the people that are not involved when I read 6.2, there is a whole list of reasons why the city might not be able to build this and this kind of makes the agreement not happen or one of them is 6.21D, the inability to acquire all the needed targeted properties necessary to allow the expenditure of this improvement. 6.2G, which is acquiring that the easements -- I'm just kind of curious which easements have been Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 20 of 70 acquired. We are moving forward here and are we advanced maybe a little too quickly if we don't have -- for example, with the one that's supposed to be done in two years, do we have the one from Simplot, do we have one from American Paving. I know if I was bringing something forward those would be a question that you would have of me to -- you know, how am I going to get there. So, those are the questions that kind of stuck out in my mind as I looked at those and if someone could clarify those I would appreciate it. De Weerd: Okay. Just for those of us who tried to follow you, can you ask your questions -- like did you have three questions in there? I think three. Brown: Yes. De Weerd: Okay. Well, at least I was tracking that. Can you just ask those three specific and, then, I know how to -- Brown: Am I correct in looking at this agreement that the -- the people that are participating in this agreement have the ability to go get the city making the request of the adjacent properties to get it for the -- some of the people that are involved in this agreement. De Weerd: So -- and maybe in layman's terms, did we have -- have we worked with those along that line to get easements and at least have their verbal agreement that that is the line and they want to work with us? Brown: Yes. And as I understand in reverse, Mr. Wood, if he goes and gets the sewer from -- from his neighbor and he brings sewer to his property, then, he also has to provide an easement at the city's request to extend the sewer, you know, through that area. De Weerd: So, beyond the main trunk that you're looking at, the ancillary, branches -- Brown: Because I understand the end goal, the end goal is to put sewer in all of this area and the way to make that happen is to insure that there is the easements to make that happen and the agreement is really clear in the fact that the developer -- landowner or developers of the future need to do that, but the way that protects that is that there is easements to go get that. De Weerd: Okay. I'm just clarifying your question. Okay. So, we have two questions -- Brown: But that's me being hopeful. De Weerd: Okay. What's your third question? Brown: The third question was what easements do you have today that are in there. De Weerd: Well, Warren, I hope you -- you can answer that. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 21 of 70 Stewart: I will do my best. Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. So -- and Bill can correct me if I'm wrong. He's the expert on the actual agreement. But I understand what our intent was when we wrote this. So, the intent with the language -- if we go back to Section 5 that Kent brought up -- was to include language in there that said this is really about the commitment the City of Meridian made, which is the two phases of the sewer trunk line, what you're seeing on this map, the dark -- the dashed green line and the dashed red line and the agreement, essentially, says if you're one of these people that's annexing property as a part of this agreement and the sewer line goes across your property, you agree to give the City of Meridian an easement at no cost in order to facilitate the extension of this sewer trunk. It does not, however -- and it was not our intent to indicate that once we get this -- this particular sewer line built and it's stubbed across Meridian Road south of Amity there, a little over a quarter of a mile, to, then, be the agent to go to other landowners and request easements on behalf of developers that may want to develop other places. That's not what we intended. I don't believe that's what the agreement says. It's specific to the piece. It's locked into the piece of infrastructure that we are building here. That was the intent, that's it for this piece of infrastructure. As far as the easements that exist, there is, essentially, two parcels that I think people are interested in that are not part of the annexation that we will need to get easements across. One of them is the Simplot property where they have the storage units and the old chicken coops and we are actually in negotiations and discussions with the Simplot folks presently. We have had conversations with them. We have another meeting, in fact, this Friday where we will be talking to them about the actual route for the line and so forth. So, we are hopeful for a positive conclusion to those negotiations. The agreement -- the reason that you see the pieces in there in Section 6, essentially, there is items in there that say, okay, if the city is unable to obtain those easements from these property owners, there is a way to back out of this for the city and for the property owners, essentially the out clause if worst case scenario comes and we cannot obtain the ability to get the sewer line through there. The property, which is being referred to as the American Paving property, is currently -- I don't know whether it's been purchased or whether there is a purchase agreement, but we have at the city an application that's actually come in for a development on that and we have been negotiating with them an easement corridor through there as well and they have been working in good faith with us on putting an easement through and across that property as well. Those are the only two pieces, other than public right of way and parcels that are included in the annexation that we need to get easements through. So, I think if we can successfully negotiate those, which we are still doing and those are going forward well I think at this point, we will be able to get the easements in place and we will be able to build the sewer. Once that sewer trunk is built to there, though, there was no intention to then act as an agent for developers out there. We essentially expect that to develop like things currently do in the city where one developer will pick it up, take it to and through his property to the next one. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Okay. Anything further? Brown: To accomplish the goal that you're trying to accomplish there needs to be an ability to go get that sewer, so realistically the one that's being done the first two years goes to two landowners and kind of dies on their property and depending how quickly or Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 22 of 70 whatever -- and I know that that will put pressure on them for those properties to maybe be developed quickly, but if there is the inability for -- for the development community, there is a number of sewer lines in the city that we can't develop property, because someone has a blockade that they are not intending to develop and where these people are in the agreement to do this and move this forward, it -- it seems shortsighted that we can't at least make that happen that there is easements or the likelihood for those and as we work in some of the other communities those easements have been provided to the development community and the city makes that happen. De Weerd: Thank you, Kent. Any questions for Mr. Brown? Okay. Thank you. Brown: Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. This is the public testimony portion. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony? No one wants to provide testimony. Okay. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Question for Mr. Nary that might tie somewhat into Kent's comments. If the -- Section 6.2 lists in each development agreement a number of conditions which could bar the city from completing the design and construction of these improvements and one of those items that could bar the city from being able to perform is that inability to acquire those target properties. If that occurs and there is no ability to acquire those target properties, the city would not be in default of the agreement. So, the condition or consequence of potential de -annexation that is one of the remedies in the event of default, but if there is not a default, what occurs if an annexation is completed, the target easements aren't acquired, the city is not in default, so the remedy provisions of the annexation don't apply, what knocks the completed annexation off center one way or the other? Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Borton, I think that was probably what Mr. Brown didn't raise in 6.2. 6.2 is all about the time that we have committed to getting this project completed. Two years and four years. All of those conditions are related to delay. So, all of those things are related to delaying the project beyond the two years, beyond the four years. That doesn't cause the default because of the delay. So, if there is a position at some point in time -- which, again, I -- this was all discussed with all the property owners in the meetings I was present at. I mean we are always hopeful that those things get resolved. They generally have been. So, those types of issues that -- I don't know at what point in time we would be making a decision and bringing to the Council and saying -- say the chicken coop property. They are never going to sell this to us, they were going to do that. We have other remedies in the code that we could address getting sewer infrastructure if we need to. So, I don't know when that conversation ever occurs. But all of this -- all of those conditions -- 6.2 all the way through N, are all about delay of the projects, not default of the projects. There are Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 23 of 70 conditions of default and the remedy -- the sole remedy of the property owner is the annexation. So, that -- that is a potential that exists out there at some point in time, but I don't know when that's going to occur, because, again, as long as we are -- and we have an application for a project that these will likely be part of that application requirement. So, we have a property that's probably going to be taken care of that Mr. Brown has already raised. The other one they -- they have much more in the interest of the Simplot property to allow that through than to not allow that through. So, we do anticipate that that will happen, but if it doesn't, again, we will have the discussion and see of other legal remedies. But all of those things were meant to deal with the potential for delay, because we are making a very aggressive commitment of the two and are four years to get it done. We wanted to make sure that if there was a necessity for delay based on things that were outside the city's control, that we weren't going to be held to a strict standard and, then, suddenly that delay immediately becomes a default and we are de -annexing everybody in two years. That's what we were trying to avoid. And Warren can correct me if I'm wrong, but all the other conversations about the -- the extensions of the sewer, in the meetings I was present in, I mean what was always explained to the property owners is the city isn't agreeing to build a sewer line all by itself with all the city's funds all the way from Victory to Amity or to -- yeah. To Amity. Yeah. So -- or Lake Hazel? Yeah. Amity. I'm sorry. That part of this was the -- was extending it through -- I think as Caleb stated, areas that are constrained and economically impractical for one or two, probably to four, to bring that sewer to that point. What we anticipated and discussed with the property owners was that the natural process of development would occur after that. The to and through policy that we have, the ordinances that require that. Again, the people that were interested in signing development agreements are all interested in developing their property. So, it wasn't ones where people just said I'm going to -- I'm going to annex because I just want to annex today, they didn't have a plan in place, but they certainly were interested in annexing in the future and developing their -- annexing now and developing in the future once sewer was available. So, I don't -- and, hopefully, that clears it up and if it muddied it up worse, then, forget it, but -- and if Caleb or Warren need to correct my -- my belief of what we discussed with the property owners, but -- but, clearly, on those two issues of the easements, those conditions in 6.2 were meant to deal with delay and not for default. Borton: Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Madam Mayor. A question about the future. Economics change and the desire of what somebody wants to build changes. Accepting these annexations without any plats or plans or even conceptual plans, something that somebody is agreeing to zone as R-4 today, if when they are actually ready to develop, be that six years from now or seven years from now, they decided it really needs to be an L -O, how easily can they change that or can they? Nary: That might be -- Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 24 of 70 Hood: Your voice is --sounds a little hoarse, so let me tackle that one. I mentioned -- Madam Mayor, Councilman Zaremba -- multiple comp plan designations and we even talked to some of the property owners about potentially changing their designation on the future land use map to office or commercial or something like that. So, that is contemplated in some of the agreements explicitly, in some of them it's just anyone within our area of impact can go through that process and change and zone to office in your example. There are a couple of them -- and I can't remember if it's universal or not, but several of them do have -- the first one is R-4, as I mentioned in my presentation. Twelve hundred of the thirteen hundred acres is R-4. Almost as a holding zone, if you will. It's to get it annexed -- now, R-4 will probably work for -- I will just -- 50 percent let's say of the property owners. But the other half will probably have to go through that rezone process. You know, properties on Meridian Road, R-4 probably isn't the best land use for a lot of those properties there. So, I envision a lot those properties rezoning. So, it is contemplated, but it's case by case for everybody. Some of them where we have it as low density residential on our map, and rezone -- we don't see the need for that, probably didn't make a development agreement that you get a free request to rezone the property, but a lot of them we did include that language in that you get the first request for a rezone and the city will process that for you. The plat and all those other fees, that's on you. But one rezone request, basically, per property, general rule of thumb I think that's probably 80 percent of these, something like that. Hope that answered the question. Zaremba: Great. Thank you. De Weerd: Any further questions? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Maybe a question for Caleb. Caleb, I think it was last week -- maybe two weeks ago that we had a fairly well attended public hearing where many of our residents were frustrated and confused because they had moved into an area that was zoned one way, felt that they weren't aware of a potential for a rezone in that area could be changed. What -- what power or what steps can we take as a Council to make sure that future residents who move out to that area are better educated or more aware of what the potential for a lot of this large piece of land mass could potentially become? Hood: Madam Mayor, Councilman Cavener, it's a good question, good point. Obviously, that hearing predated -- or it came after a lot of this stuff that we kind of worked through and I know we don't like to -- generally we do like to have our zoning designations match our future land use map and that would be the one thing I would request for anybody that's talking something. If you looked at the zoning map, that's good, that's today. Look at the future land use map. That's tells you what -- with pretty little effort someone could up zone the property to. So, this -- what we see on the map now is what I tend to send to a lot of folks, to say it may be zoned R-4 now, but what does it show on our future land use map? What's the ultimate vision for the property. Same case with that one. If you Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 25 of 70 look at the comp plan map, it doesn't show single family homes. So, that's the one request. It's not -- you can't just go to a zoning map and it's R-4, it's always going to be R- 4. You really need to go to -- and even this isn't set in stone. You can change it. So, it's something where, you know, you need to regularly check it, do your due diligence, but this is the one document I would recommend folks go to to look at and say what's the potential look like to rezone that property. Cavener: Thanks. De Weerd: Further questions from Council? Again, before I ask if Council would like to close the public hearing, is there any further testimony? Okay. Milam: Madam Mayor? I.4TH.�2 6Ma=►VAnFr11 Milam: I move that we close the public hearing H-2015-0019. Zaremba: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in favor say aye. Did I get all ayes? Okay. Thank you, Mr. Zaremba. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Okay. Discussion? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Zaremba: I actually got it in on time with everybody else, so that's probably why you didn't hear me. De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we approve the annexation and zoning of 1,322.14 acres of land with R-4 --I guess I don't need to read all of that, do I? H-2015-0019. Rountree: Second. Milam: With all staff and applicant comments. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second. Any discussion from Council? Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 26 of 70 Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: I will say to those that are in the room that are related to this annexation, thank you for your diligence and working together and working with staff. We appreciate that. And we expect that you will hold our feet to the fire, so -- and I will tell -- I will thank our staff. Warren, Caleb, Robert, Tom, Bill, thank you. There was countless hours in work with the neighbors and listening to their concerns, addressing their concerns. Tonight was a testament of that -- that hard work and you have established a foundation of trust and now we need to continue that relationship and thank you again for your due diligence. H. Continued from December 1, 2015: Shelburne Subdivision No. 1 (H-2015-0004) by Shelburne Properties, LLC Located 1/4 Mile East of S. Eagle Road and North of E. Amity Road Approved w/ Conditions 1. Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty -Eight (48) Building Lots and Twelve (12) Common Lots on 19.42 Acres of Land in the R-4 Zoning District De Weerd: Okay. Item 7-H is continued from December 1st. It's on H-2015-0004. I will ask for staff comments on this final plat. Watters: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The next application before you is a request for a final plat. This site consists of 19.42 acres of land. It's zoned R-4 and is located east of South Eagle Road off of East Zaldia Lane, north of East Amity Road. The proposed final plat depicts 48 new building lots and 12 common area lots. All of the proposed lots are for single family detached homes and comply with the dimensional standards of the R-4 district. There are two existing homes and an accessory structure on this site that are proposed to remain on lots within the subdivision. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat and found the number of buildable lots and common area lots the same as shown on the preliminary plat. Therefore, staff finds the proposed final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat. A condition of approval of the preliminary plat required emergency access to be provided for any development over 40 building lots. The applicant has submitted a recorded emergency access easement over the adjacent property owned by the Taylors in compliance with this requirement. Written testimony has been received from Katie Miller, the applicant's representative, in response to the staff report. Staff is recommending approval with the conditions in the staff report, with one change. That site specific condition number 5-B be deleted, which states remove the western most driveway, stub street shown at the north boundary of the site as it was not approved with the preliminary plat and not shown on the final plat and instead add a new condition under the site specific condition number four as follows: A driveway easement Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 27 of 70 shall be depicted across block one for the existing driveway for the property at 3550 East Zaldia Lane and what that's in reference to is there is a -- there is a driveway -- if you can see my pointer right here to this property -- this one right -- one of these two right here. That just allows for their driveway access still. Staff will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Thank you. Is the applicant here this evening? Would you like to provide testimony? Or staff adequately portrayed your application. Yes. Staff says what you would have. Okay. There you go. Council, any -- Council, any questions for the applicant or staff? This is a final plat. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I'm still trying to understand the driveway easement. Just to the right of where the driveway easement is talked about, to the right of that is that a current or future planned public road? That right there. Watters: Yes. Zaremba: Is that -- is that a public road? And I guess my question is should this access to Zaldia Lane continue forever or should they eventually take their access on that side road, if that's a side road? Watters: At that time we would look at -- when it redevelops we would look at the access. Right now we have a driveway access that we need to preserve. This is a future public street access for the future extension of Zaldia as a public street along the north boundary. But until these county properties develop that's -- that's how it's going to be for a while. Zaremba: So, Madam Mayor, follow up. Should we say as part of that condition that the driveway easement needs to exist until the property redevelops or the use changes or some wording like that? Watters: We can. Zaremba: I would feel more comfortable if we included that. Watters: That's fine. I can add that. De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions for staff? Okay. Do I have a motion? Zaremba: Madam Mayor, I move we close the public hearing on -- De Weerd: We don't have a public hearing. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 28 of 70 Zaremba: Uh? De Weerd: This is not a public hearing. Zaremba: Oh, it wasn't. Okay. Well, in that case, Madam Mayor, I move we approve H-2015-0004, to include staff's comments and with the noted condition that we would delete site specific condition 5.13 and add a new condition under specific number four that says a driveway easement shall be depicted across Block 1 for the existing driveway for the property at 2550 East Zaldia Lane, which easement will continue until -- is there a name for that future street? Watters: East Zaldia Lane. It's private right now, but -- Zaremba: That's what -- well, let me just identify it as the street that -- the future public street that will create the eastern boundary of the property in question. De Weerd: And also referred to as East Zaldia Lane. Okay. Zaremba: That works. De Weerd: Do I have a second? De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion by Council? Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. I. Public Hearing for Una Mas (H-2015-0016) by Glenn Walker, NeuDesign Architecture Located Southwest Corner of E. Ustick Road and N. Records Avenue 1. Request: Modification to the Development Agreement to Remove the Requirement for all Building Elevations to be in Substantial Conformance with the Previously Approved Elevations De Weerd: Item 7-1 is a public hearing for Una Mas at H-2015-0016. I will open the public hearing with staff comments. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 29 of 70 Watters: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Council. The next application before you is a request for a development agreement modification. This site consists of 9.5 acres of land, zoned C -G, located at the southwest corner of East Ustick Road and North Records Avenue. This property was annexed with a development agreement back in 2005. The applicant requests a modification to the development agreement to remove the portion of development agreement provision number 5.1.12 that requires all buildings to be in substantial conformance with the elevations presented at the April 4th, 2006, hearing, as shown here on the right, and have similar modulation and treatments to those elevations as determined by the planning director. Because the city has since adopted design standards since this project's approval in 2006, the quality of design to this development can be insured through design review as currently required in the development agreement and by the UDC with a certification of zoning compliance and design applications. So, staff is fine with the applicant's proposed change. Glenn Walker submitted written testimony in agreement with the staff report. He is the applicant's representative and staff is recommending approval of the proposed modification to the development agreement. Staff will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Okay. Would the applicant like to provide comment? No? Okay. We found Kent Brown's name, so just wanted to let know we found the missing sheet. He signed up to testify on this item and I don't think he wants to. Is there anyone that would like to provide testimony on this item? Okay. Council, seeing -- Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we close the public hearing on H -- De Weerd: Item I? Do you know that? Bird: Yeah. H-2015-0016. Zaremba: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 7-1. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. LVA WI11670[4W-11V �1Z197I_1IW_\'1�II Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve H-2015-0016 and to include -- include staff comments and applicant response. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 30 of 70 Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 7-1. Any discussion by Council? Madam Clerk. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. J. Public Hearing for Eagle Commons at Overland (H-2015-0024) by Eagle Commons at Overland, LLC Located Northeast Corner of S. Eagle Road and E. Overland Road 1. Request: Execute a Development Agreement Required with the Annexation of the Property for the Purpose of Including a Concept Plan and Specific Provisions Relevant to the Development of the Property De Weerd: Item 7-J has requested a continuance through -- until January 5th, 2016. 1 will open this public hearing and ask for a motion to continue. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we continue H-2015-0024 to January 5th, 2016. LVA n17 17, iii. - .. 0 .1 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to continue Item 7-J to January 5th, 2016. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. I'm going to miss you, Mr. Zaremba. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. K. Public Hearing for Twelve Oaks Center Subdivision (H-2015- 0025) by Twelve Oakes, LLC Located South Side of W. Franklin Road, Approximately 1/4 Mile West of S. Linder Road Approved 1. Request: Short Plat Approval Consisting of Four (4) Building Lots on 1.44 Acres of Land in a C -C Zoning District De Weerd: Okay. Item 7-K is a public hearing on H-2015-0025. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 31 of 70 Watters: Thank you, Madam Mayor. The next application before you is a request for a short plat. This site consists of 1.44 acres of land, zoned C -C, located at the south side of West Franklin Road, approximately a quarter mile west of South Linder Road. The proposed subdivision is a re -subdivision of Lot 1, Block 1, of Twelve Oaks Subdivision. The proposed plat consists of four building lots. All of the proposed lots comply with the dimensional standards of the C -C and the TN -R districts as applicable and is in substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in the UDC for short plats. Written testimony has been received from Carl Porter, the applicant's representative, in agreement with the staff report and staff is recommending approval with the conditions in the report. Staff will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions? :3 0MIIFV03TI *Lt2 De Weerd: Mr. Cavener, did you have a question? Cavener: No questions. De Weerd: Okay. Would the applicant like to make comment? Okay. Council -- oh, this is a public hearing. Is there anyone who would like to hear or provide public testimony on this item? You would think it was really late already. It seems like I have been doing this all night. I see no public testimony. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we close the public hearing on 7-K. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 7-K. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we approve H-2015-0025 with all staff comments and applicant's response. Rountree: Second. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 32 of 70 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion by Council? Madam Clerk, roll call, please. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. L. Public Hearing for TM Creek East (H-2015-0018) by SCS Brighton, LLC Located Southeast Corner of S. Ten Mile Road and W. Franklin Road 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 14.93 Acres of Land with an R-40 Zoning District Request: Modification to the Development Agreement (Inst. #1140457759) for TM Creek to Include the Subject 14.93 Acre Parcel in the Agreement 2. Request: Modification to the Development Agreement (Inst. #1140457759) for TM Creek to Include the Subject 14.93 Acre Parcel in the Agreement De Weerd: Item 7-L is a public hearing on H-2015-0018, for the annexation and zoning and a modification to a DA. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Watters: Thank you, Madam Mayor. The next applications before you are a request for annexation and zoning and a development agreement modification. This site consists of 14.93 acres of land, currently zoned RUT in Ada County and is generally located on the south side of West Franklin Road, approximately a quarter mile east of South Ten Mile Road. The applicant requests approval to annex and zone 14.93 acres of land with an R- 40 zoning district, consistent with the corresponding future land use map designation of high density residential for this site. The applicant proposes to develop multi -family residential uses on this site. A conceptual development plan was submitted as shown that depicts high density multi -family residential use of the property, with arrows depicting internal and external circulation and a general alignment of a future mid mile collector on the property to the east. A subsequent conditional use permit application will be required for approval of a multi -family development in the R-40 zoning district. Staff is not recommending a new development agreement as a provision of annexation. However, the applicant is proposing a current modification to the development agreement for TM Creek. That is the property here to the west. The development is under the same ownership and they would like to incorporate the subject property in that agreement. Staff recommends a few new provisions are added to the development agreement that pertain to the development of the subject property, including, but not limited to the following: Provide cross -access between properties. Construct a multi -use pathway along the north side of the Ten Mile Creek. Subdivide the property prior to issuance of any building permit and provide an overall target density of at least 16 to 25 dwelling units per acre. The Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 33 of 70 Commission did recommend approval of the subject annexation and zoning. Mike Wardle testified in favor. No one testified in opposition. Gary Hansen commented on the application. And written testimony was received from Mike Wardle, the applicant's representative, in agreement with the staff report. There are no outstanding issues for City Council and there has been no written testimony since the Commission hearing. Staff will stand for any questions. Rountree: Questions for staff? Bird: I have none. Rountree: Seeing none, is the -- Mike, you want to make a presentation? Just a short one? Wardle: Okay. Mr. President, Commission -- Council Members. Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation. Address 12601 West Explorer Drive in Boise. I would just note that you have seen in the staff reports that these are two companion applications that were encouraged in discussions earlier in the year concerning the formation of the Urban Renewal District in the Ten Mile area. And so the Brighton parcel is coming forward and staff has noted that we are incorporating that into the previous TM Creek project and so, really, we have no issues at all. It is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The zoning R-40 is appropriate and its just an extension of what we did previously. I would answer any questions that you have. Rountree: Questions for the applicant? Thank you. This is a public hearing. Anyone wish to provide testimony on this application? Seeing none, are there any further questions for the applicant or staff? Bird: Mr. President? Wen riiff--Im■LVA M:31�i1 Bird: I move we close the public hearing on H-2015-0018. Milam: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and second to close the public hearing on this item. All those in favor signify by aye. Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Borton: Mr. President? Quick question for Mr. Nary. The modification for the DA, how was that -- is that referenced in the same 2015-0018 application? Because it's the DA for the different property or do you represent by instrument? Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 34 of 70 Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council, Council Member Borton, so what we will do in the modification is we will tie it back to the original instrument. So, this -- so, in your approval it's fine to use the language that's in here, but we will tie it together in the modification in the addendum. Rountree: Need a motion. Bird: Madam -- or Mr. President. I would move we approve H-2015-0018 and that is annex and zoning of 14.93 acres and also the modification to the development agreement on 14.93 acres and to include all staff and applicant comments. Borton: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item L. Roll call. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Okay. That was M; right? Rountree: No. We are on M now. M. Public Hearing for Calnon Properties (H-2015-0017) by Kostka & Calnon, LLC / Calnon Enterprises, LTD Located 2215 W. Franklin Road 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 55.55 Acres of Land with C -C (40.06 Acres), TN -C (5.46 Acres) and TN -R (10.03 Acres) Zoning Districts 2. Request: Amendment to the Future Land Use Map Contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan to Change the Land Use Designation on 40.06 Acres of Land from Medium High and High Density Residential to Mixed Use Commercial; and 15.49 Acres of Land from Medium, Medium - High and High Density Residential to Mixed Use Residential De Weerd: Okay. 7-M is a public hearing on Calnon Property, H-2015-0017, annexation and zoning and amendment to the future land use map. I will open these public hearings with staff comments. Watters: Thank you, Madam Mayor. The next applications before you are a request for a Comprehensive Plan map amendment and an annexation and zoning. This site consists of approximately 54 acres of land, currently zoned RUT in Ada County, located at 2215 West Franklin Road. This is the property directly to the east of the property you just Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 35 of 70 heard. The applicant proposes to amend the future land use map contained in the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation on 40.06 acres of land from medium high density residential and high density residential to mixed use commercial and 15.49 acres of land from medium density residential, medium high density residential and high density residential to mixed use residential. Annexation and zoning of 55.55 acres of land to a C -C zoning district, which consists of 40.06 acres of the site. TN -C zoning, which is 5.46 acres, and TN -R zoning, which is 10.03 acres, developer requested. A concept plan was submitted that depicts retail, office, and service commercial uses within the proposed MUC area and professional office and medium high density residential uses within the proposed MUR area. And that is right over here. The arrows depicting internal and external circulation and the general alignment of a future mid mile collector street are also depicted. On mixed use areas, development is required to integrate the three major use categories, residential, commercial and employment. The MUC area does not include a residential component and the MUR area does not include and commercial component as required. Professional office combined with medium high density residential at a density of eight to fifteen units per acre is depicted on a small portion of the site, but does not commit to a minimum number of units. As is with the current residential land use designation a target density of 508 dwelling units could be expected for this area. With the proposed change to the future land use map this number is substantially decreased to approximately 136 units. These calculations assume development with a 25 percent loss to infrastructure and open space and the average target density of each land use designation, less the area owned by NMID for the Vaughn Lateral is located and the creek. As a compromise between the applicant's proposal and the higher density of residential uses currently designated and anticipated for this area, staff recommends a change from the mixed use community land use designation proposed south of the Ten Mile Creek and west of the future collector street to mixed use residential consistent with that proposed on the east side of the collector street. This will insure a higher density of residential uses in this area, which will contribute to the mix of uses required in the MUR designation. Within MUC areas no more than 30 percent of the land area should be residential. Within MUR areas no more than 40 percent of the land area should be nonresidential. While not necessarily the burden of this application area, it should be understood that cumulative changes to this area of the Ten Mile plan, east of Ten Mile Road, have likely resulted in a loss of employment and residential densities needed to support transit supportive development. The loss of employment and residential acreage and the loss of transit supportive densities may limit future transportation services and have long term transportation implications. However, realizing a significant higher density residential component is still important to the long term viability of the area. Cumulative changes to the future land uses within the Ten Mile interchange have resulted in significantly more commercial property than originally planned. With both employment and residential densities lessened in this application area and elsewhere within the specific area plan, it is unclear how a further reduction of residential acreage and increased commercial acreage can be supported within this area of Meridian. In accord with staff's recommended change to the future land use map for the 9.3 acre area south of the creek and west of the future collector street, staff recommends a zoning change from the proposed C -C to the R-40 zoning district. This is as shown here on the map on the left. Further, staff recommends a site reconfiguration of the proposed TN -C and TN -R Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 36 of 70 districts as follows: A total of 6.9 acres of TN -C zoning on either side of the future collector street south of the creek at a depth of 300 feet from center line and 6.5 acres of TN -R zoning on the remainder of the site south of the creek and east of the collector street in the TN -C zoning. This will leave 32.9 acres of C -C zoning on the north side of the creek. The R-40 zoning will enable the development of high density residential uses as desired in this area, which will merge with that to the west for a larger development area. The zoning should be compatible with future development to the south in the C -G and TN -C district and to the east in the TN -C district. The TN -C and TN -R zoning will accommodate the office and medium high density residential uses proposed by the applicant. The TN -C zoning will allow traditional neighborhood style development on either side of the collector street, which will provide a transition from development in the C -C zone to the north and will merge with the future traditional neighborhood uses to the south. It will also allow for a wide variety of small scale retail, commercial, and community service uses. The TN -R zoning will allow for the development of a daycare center, as well as other residential types, for example, single family, townhouse, duplex, multi -family, and vertically integrated residential uses. It will provide a transition in uses and zoning to the existing and future medium density single family residential properties to the east and south. The C -C zoning will allow small scale retail office and service commercial uses as proposed, as well as a wide variety of commercial uses, such as restaurant, drive-thru establishments and personal and professional services. Employment uses, such as offices, daycare center, industry -- industry, information, and hotel and motels and residential uses, such as multi -family and vertically integrated residential. Overall, the zoning proposed by the applicant as refined by staff, will allow for the development of a mix of residential, commercial, and employment uses as required in MUC and MUR designated areas if the site is developed in accord with the provisions in the development agreement and recommended by staff. To insure a density compatible with the Ten Mile plan for this area, while still compromising on overall land uses for this area, staff recommends a minimum of 380 dwelling units are provided on the overall site. In order to insure the site develops as proposed and as recommended by staff, staff recommends a development agreement is required as a provision of annexation that includes, but is not limited to, the following provisions. The development agreement shall be modified prior to any development occurring on the site to include a more detailed conceptual development plan that is consistent with the MUC and MUR designations and includes a mix of uses from each major use category, commercial, residential and employment. Future development is required to incorporate design elements contained in the Ten Mile plan for the MUC and MUR designated areas. This property shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits. A minimum of 380 residential dwelling units of varying types are required to be provided. A ten foot wide multi -use pathway is required along the north side of the Ten Mile Creek and to the property to the south per the master pathways plan. Direct access to Franklin Road is prohibited, except for the future collector street and cross -access is required to the properties to the east and west. The Commission recommended approval of the subject application per the staff report. Mike Wardle, the applicant's representative, testified in favor. No one testified in opposition or on the application. Written testimony was received from Mike Wardle, the applicant's representative, in response to the staff report. Key issues of discussion by the Commission -- the Commission was conflicted in determining the number of the Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 37 of 70 residential units and density appropriate for this site and did leave it up to the Council to determine if the staff recommendation is appropriate or if a lesser number or density would be more appropriate. And that's condition number 1.1D in the staff report. The Commission did not make any changes to the staff recommendation. The outstanding issue for the Council is the number of residential units and density appropriate for this site. Written testimony has been received from Mike Wardle since the Commission hearing. Since that hearing staff has met with the applicant and discussed a modification to the zoning of the property, which more accurately depicts the mid mile collector and zoning established by the Ten Mile Center project to the south. Staff does not object to applicant's proposed change. And that proposed change here is the map on your right. The applicant also requests a minimum number of residential units required to be constructed on the site be reduced from 380 to 218. Staff is not in favor of the proposed reduction. Lastly, the applicant requests development agreement provision 1.1.11, which prohibits direct lot access via West Franklin Road be modified as follows: Direct lot access via West Franklin Road, an arterial street, is prohibited per UDC 11-3A-3. The applicant would like to add unless approved by ACHD and the city in conjunction with a more detailed development plan and/or subdivision application. Staff is okay with this change, as any future plans will come by the -- come through the City Council and you can have an opportunity at that time to approve a waiver for access. Staff will stand for any questions the Mayor and Council may have. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions at this point? Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I have a technical question that I'm not sure is even a valid question, so I will ask it and we will see. There was a time when we required six months to elapse between changes to the Comprehensive Plan map. I don't know if that's still true. It was true at one time. If it's still true, my memory is pinging me that we did one of these about three or four months ago and I can't identify where, but I'm thinking south of the interstate. Watters: Madam Mayor, Councilman Zaremba, we still have that provision in our code if it's a sole application for a comp plan map amendment. If another application is accompanying it, we are letting those go through as often as submitted now. Zaremba: I think I understood that. Thank you. Watters: So, they don't have to wait six -- every six months. Zaremba: Okay. That's what I wanted to hear. De Weerd: Anything further from Council? Thank you. Would the applicant like to make comment? Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 38 of 70 Wardle: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Mike Wardle. 12601 West Explorer Drive in Boise. want to thank Sonya. It was a lot of technical information. I hope to make it reasonably simple and short in our discussion and based on staff's comment relative to the three issues that we had put on your plate, as it were, hopefully we just need to address one of those three this evening and that would be the minimum number of residential units. I just want to take a step back for a moment, just to note that in the discussions earlier in the year Kathy Kostca, who is the owner of the Calnon property, has indicated that she has no plans at this point, but with the city's encouragement for participation in the URD, Mr. Turnbull volunteered to basically companion these applications and bring them forward and so that's the reason that this is brought forward with very little specific information at this time, but it affords the city the opportunity to bring some property in that will add value to the potential renewal district. We just note that with the discussion Sonya identified since we had -- actually two discussions. First of all, since the applications were submitted and prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission, we had the discussion about modifying our request for Comprehensive Plan amendment and we concurred with that and as it's been presented the area north of Ten Mile Creek will be designated mixed use commercial. The area south mixed use residential and that was an acceptable alternative and agreed upon with staff and the Commission. Conceptually we also agreed with the zoning designations that were brought forward, but you saw in the handout that we provided that the conceptual difference between the zoning that was proposed by staff at the Planning and Zoning hearing really was based on the Comprehensive Plan map and did not account for the actual alignments established for the mid mile collector with the Treasure Valley Investments property immediately to the south or the adjacent zones. So, those were really the issues. But with staff's consent or agreement with the applicant request on the zoning, restated that the Council accept and approve B&A Engineers November 16th, 2015, zoning map, that issue, I believe, is laid to rest and the third, which relates to a discussion that we actually had on the Brighton parcel with ACHD, they simply noted that on specific applications right -in, right -out limited access certainly can be considered and so we just added that request for clarifying language. Which takes us back to the one issue and that is the minimum density standard and when we got to the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing I suffered some brain damage trying to look at the formulas. So, Sonya, if you would go to the fourth slide -- and some day I'm going to learn how to use this, but I'm not sure when. Watters: I can come to your office and give you a PowerPoint tutorial. Wardle: Yeah. There you go. This -- this was the slide presented at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing and it was a request that instead of the 380 units that staff had recommend as the minimum number for the overall site, that we used, actually, the Comprehensive Plan designations that you have in your standards right now in the mixed use commercial, which is the area, again, north of Ten Mile Creek, which is that strong division line kind of about two-thirds of the way south in the property and also in the mixed use residential designations it establishes the target density for the areas at the same, eight to 12 units per acre. Now, staff in its formula had suggested ten units per acre, but it's our belief that if we are going to establish the minimums, that the minimums ought to be founded on what your Comprehensive Plan actually says. The minimum it suggests as Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 39 of 70 a target would be eight. So, that was what led to the 188 unit request at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. And, Sonya, if we go to the third of the last slide. Using the zone map that takes it from the conceptual to actual -- and I just want to note that the little red circle at the bottom of that map is the actual location of the mid mile collector established with the Treasure Valley Investments project. So, utilizing, then, a formula that staff had kind of worked with talking about -- and I'm not going to get into the technicalities, because there is some percentage issues and so forth, but based on, again, some reasonable or minimum standards, C -C dwelling unit count as noted in the northerly area there, that 30 point -- 32.84 acres times 30 percent, which comes out of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan times the minimum established in the Comprehensive Plan, would yield 78 acres in that area. And, again, this is not to say that there will be 78 in that area or in any of the others specifically. The R-40 dwelling units at 7.22 acres -- and this is really the distinction between staff and the applicant. The staff recommendation as a minimum for -- or the calculation for that R-40 was actually 25 units per acre and you would be hard pressed to find in the city today any multi -family project that actually was developed at 25 units per acre. Twenty, sometimes a little bit plus or minus, is typical. The project that we will bring forward immediately to the west of this, as we currently have it configured, is right at 20 units per acre. So, if we establish a minimum of 25, we have, essentially, said this is going to have more than almost anything else developed in the city. So, we utilized, again, a number, 12 units per acre at a minimum that would generate 86 units and, then, the TN -R utilizing again a formula of a percentage, 75 percent of the land are being utilized for residential, would yield 54. So, the number using your Comprehensive Plan and reasonable numbers, particularly for the R-40, would come up to about 218. Now, I was tempted to bring a sword this evening, but didn't think I could get it into City Hall, so that the Council could, in its wisdom, you know, and utilize the Solomon rule and figure this out. But clearly 380 units is not an appropriate minimum number to be applied to the properties that are before you. It's not to say that there won't be substantially more than what we are proposing, the 218, when it gets down to reality in the future, but if we establish it at that point now, it might -- it might have some impact on market capability to respond to reasonably, good opportunities that might come to the city that, otherwise, would be deferred. So, we would propose, based on the information that we have -- the discussions with staff, that the one point of disagreement is this number and ask the Council to -- utilizing the minimums established in the Comprehensive Plan, set that number as the minimum number of residential units on the overall properties at 218. And I will be happy to answer any questions that you have. De Weerd: So, Mike, on that typically when you put any number in there it becomes the minimal and the maximum. In particular at a public hearing that the public comes to this density is usually the -- the hot button, the hot issue, so you're comfortable with this, knowing that often people will pull it out of the public testimony and out of the documents and say, you know, this is what we were expecting and base their testimony on that. Wardle: Madam Mayor, it's a good question and it provokes the answer that perhaps no number is appropriate, because the zoning and the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan necessitate certain numbers of -- for instance, R-40 is going to be a multi -family project. The TN -R is going to have -- could be, as Sonya pointed out, could be single Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 40 of 70 family, but it could be townhomes, it could be even multi -family. In the C -C zone by conditional use permit you could do multi -family. So, perhaps no number is appropriate, because something will come back in the future with residential uses. So, I appreciate the question. It's a good -- perhaps the best solution. De Weerd: Let's just stick with the zone. Council, any questions for Mike? Okay. Thank you. Wardle: Thank you. De Weerd: This is a public hearing. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony on this item? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Does staff agree with the calculations on the slide five, the math that's done? I presume so, but -- Watters: On the current slide? Borton: Correct. Watters: This is the applicant's calculation. Borton: Correct. Watters: Staff's calculations are quite different. I'm not sure what you're asking. Borton: The potential minimum residential units for these zonings -- is this map correct, understanding that staff would like a greater minimum. Watters: I believe so, Councilman Borton. Borton: Okay. Understanding that's not your recommendation. De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions from Council? Bird: I have none. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 41 of 70 Borton: I have a couple questions for Mike before, but -- Wardle: Yes, sir. I could have asked them when he was up Borton: With regard to the requested change on the DA 1.1.11, are you comfortable with inclusion into that language that the permissive access is only related to potential right -in, right -out? Wardle: Madam Mayor, Council Member Borton, yes. Yes, because that's actually ACHD controls that, they will have their access management standards that they will apply. It's not to say that short term until a lot of additional development occurs they may allow something more, but eventually it's like the only -- it's a right -in, right -out, except for the quarter mile collector to the west in the TM Creek project and the mid mile collector that will be developed through the Calnon properties. Borton: So, would that inclusion be acceptable, though? Wardle: As we proposed It? Borton: Well, specifying a right -in, right -out. Wardle: Yes. Because that's actually what ACHD had already indicated to us that we said as acceptable when we -- we actually made that contact before we bought the Calnon property that came in as TM Creek this evening. And so it was in response to the question specifically can we have a right -- you know, at least that type of an access and it was approved. Borton: Okay. Wardle: Subject to, obviously, the development application in the future. Borton: Okay. And, Madam Mayor, the second question I think staff in their presentation and in the application material brings up some -- some compelling narrative regarding residential densities and the loss of that in the general area and kind of the basis for their recommendation. Can you speak to the reason why that shouldn't be promoted more, as staff suggests? Wardle: Why increased density? Borton: Yeah. If the math on the slide is correct and the recommendation is the minimum density is 218 and staff's recommending for the purposes described that it's set at 380, give me your perspective on why the concerns about loss of employment in residential densities in the area shouldn't be resolved by kind of bumping that floor up above the 218. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 42 of 70 Wardle: I'd like to go back to slide two, Sonya. Sorry. Slide three. There we go. Obviously, the Brighton -- the Calnon properties. If you look to the north, the city has already annexed and zoned the entire complex as industrial. It's from my own perhaps seasoned experience that you're not going to see the type of tier residential along that corridor facing industrial that might be desirable and so as this application came forward we were looking for greater flexibility, that's why the mixed use commercial and the commercial zone, but there, again, there are some requirements for a certain percentage of residential component to be included therein and the same thing with the mixed use residential to the south of Ten Mile Creek, again, some minimum residential components. So, I think we are simply arguing do we put a number on it or not. The number that staff has proposed -- and this is staff report page 12 and it's -- obviously, you don't probably have direct, easy access to it, but in their -- in the calculation that staff had proposed the R-40 at 25 dwelling units per acre. Again, that number is extremely high as a minimum. And, then, rather than using the minimums established by the Comprehensive Plan, they proposed the mid range or the average, eight to 12. So, again, we are simply asking if we do put a number in the development agreement let's establish it as the minimums and we are willing to concede, rather than the 188, to 218 based on a little bit of a different formulation than we had at Planning and Zoning. But I would go back to the Mayor's question and even wonder why perhaps we put a number in their at all. So, I hope that answers a little bit of your question. Turnbull: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Borton, David Turnbull, Brighton Corporation, 12601 West Explorer Drive. De Weerd: Thank you. Turnbull: You know, I think there is a lot of good work that's gone into this from our original application. We have had very productive meetings with staff and came to broad resolutions and fine resolutions -- I mean more detailed resolutions. This one issue that we are kind of stuck on right here -- and I agree with Mike that the Mayor made kind of a good point. I remember 25 years ago -- a very good point. A very good point. And I remember 25 years ago when I first started developing property in the City of Meridian the complaint was we have got too much residential, we don't have enough commercial, we need more property tax base and my how things have changed. So, I think our point here is that we are trying to build in enough flexibility. Obviously, Brighton on the existing property we have directly to the east is going to have well over 300 units and that's a lot of residential in any given area. To add a minimum on top of that of 388, you're talking -- you're getting into the seven, eight hundred unit range in a very small area and there is very few places in this community -- I don't know of any places in this community right now that support that kind of density yet. I will tell you that if the market evolves and changes and it will support that kind of density, it is perhaps the highest and best use of that property, that, obviously, we will be coming forth with applications like that. But we are hesitant to have minimums set up as a requirement, because those just set markers that, you know, potentially run afoul of what the market will support, what the market will demand and so we are offering a compromise. If you do choose to set a minimum standard, we do think that the minimum standard that is proposed by staff is too high. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 43 of 70 But, otherwise, like I said, we have had some very good dialogue, collaborative efforts with the staff and we appreciate all of their efforts. So, hope that answers the question. De Weerd: Thank you. Did you have additional questions for Mr. Wardle? Rountree: I have got a question for Mike. De Weerd: Okay. Rountree: Mike, I have the same issues with my system up here as you have with yours, because it keeps kicking me off, and I can't recall in our packet on this project was there a neighborhood meeting? Wardle: Madam Mayor, Council Member Rountree, yes, we had a neighborhood meeting and, interestingly enough, I expected something far different than what happened. The neighbors that came didn't really have any particular issues and they were primarily the single family neighbors to the east. There was no opposition and nobody came to the hearing, so -- Rountree: That was my question, because the last time we saw this we had a room full. The project to the south. Wardle: Oh. Yes. Well, we anticipated similar interest, but they were invited -- Rountree: That's good. Thank you. Wardle: Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Anything further for the applicant? Bird: I have nothing. Wardle: Thank you, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Council, any further information needed from the applicant or staff? I would entertain a motion to close if not. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Move that we close the public hearing on Item M, H-2015-0017. Rountree: Second. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 44 of 70 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 7-M, one and two. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Borton: Mr. Nary, is there an order to these that's required with regard to implement a future land use map prior to an annexation? Nary: Yes. Borton: Okay. Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I would move that we approve the future land use map amendment as proposed by the applicant in H-2015-0017, to include -- I don't know if it goes in the map amendment itself -- residential unit count. Mr. Nary? Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, isn't that part of the DA? Wasn't that part of the DA conditions? Borton: It is. Nary: Yeah. So, it wouldn't be on the map, it would just be on the annexation. Borton: Then I move for the approval of the amendment to the future land use map as present by the applicant, specifically the map provided by B&A Engineers, dated November 16th, 2015. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Okay. Hearing none, Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Borton. Borton: I would move that we approve H-2015-0017, the annexation and zoning of Kostca and Calnon Properties to include DA requirement in 1.1.1D, establishing a minimum Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 45 of 70 residential unit base of 218 units, as well as the DA modification of 1.1.11 regarding right - in, right -out access if approved by ACHD and the city, as well as the zoning map dated November 16, 2015. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and second. Just a question there. There was some discussion on not placing the minimum, just having the R-40 and applicant would -- would come back with the appropriate densities at that time. Just wanted to see if you wanted to set the minimum, because it -- we have all heard apartment testimony often enough to know that a minimum becomes the maximum as well. Borton: Madam Mayor? I04TWI �=2 6MA=IS • • , Borton: The motion still includes a minimum. I think the understanding it might create some potential confusion for the public. If it truly, in fact, the accurate application of our existing zoning requirements and the true minimum available for the site as zoned, then, it does nothing more than provide the public an accurate reflection of what the potential minimum is. If it's misconstrued to be a public -- or, excuse me, to be a maximum -- I would rather have that clarity included in the DA. It doesn't inhibit any of the development rights of the developer -- De Weerd: To increase their density. Borton: They clearly can -- can go above that -- can go within any range provided by our zoning. De Weerd: I think footnoted that would be a good thing, so you don't put our future council in a predicament. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: But, then, would it be more clear to put a minimum and a maximum? No? Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: It may be semantics, but rather than say this is a minimum, could we say no less than and that may be interpreted -- no less than may be interpreted differently than minimum. It's a word choice. I'm just wondering if that helps. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 46 of 70 Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: On discussion, I like the idea of not even having numbers, because of the simple fact is this 218 is the minimum, but when somebody gets -- when somebody buys a property and stuff they might look at 218, but they don't -- you know, they don't -- they think that's max, they don't -- they don't read or we don't -- we don't get it down right on the plats or something. I mean I don't know how many times -- and all of us have been through this -- that people come in and I mean it's a plain as your nose what it says, but they all swear up and down that that's not what they were told. While I prefer the 218 over the 380, 1 could -- I could sure -- and maybe we can't with our existing ordinances land maps and stuff, but I would just soon not have a number, period, stuck to it. Let the -- let the zoning types determine the density. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Just respectfully disagree, only to the extent that -- that its inclusion provides some glimmer of clarity and if you exclude it, then, you have the risk of the public trying to decipher it themselves, do the calculation, believe that perhaps the minimum units is 80 and being even more upset. I don't know if there is an answer that can solve that on every situation. So long as the developer has complete rights to develop within the full range of densities allowed by the zone, including the minimum units, might help the public know that surely it isn't 50. De Weerd: I think with that clarity that that certainly helps. Or the glimmer of clarity. I like that. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: I think that's quote worthy Yes, Mrs. Milam. Milam: Along that note, it also -- it's such a small amount that it could be misleading. If people were looking at that for some guidance when, in reality, there could be 40 units per acre, which is -- what is that? How much is that? How many acres? Seven? Oh, it's 280. Is that the one we are talking about or a different piece? Yeah. I don't know. De Weerd: I think there are a lot of people who like to see them reduce it and think they R-40 really only have 20 and, then, they are the heroes. Really. Borton: Madam Mayor, I think -- I think having the floor, if there is any matrix to include, the floor is the one that might matter. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 47 of 70 De Weerd: Okay. The motion stands and if there is no further discussion, Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. With a glimmer of clarity. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Council, I am going to recommend that Item 8-A and B be moved to the 22nd, next week. So, if any staff is kind of hanging out to participate in the strategic plan update and quarterly dashboard discussion, we can have it next week, unless anyone here in the public is here to listen to that specifically. Anyone here listening to that specifically? Okay. Any opposition to that? Rountree: No. De Weerd: Next week is very light and we are going to start at 5:00, so that we can have an opportunity to have a cup of punch with Mr. Zaremba and Mr. Rountree, so -- from 5:00 to 6:00. But anyway. Okay. If there is -- there is no objection, so we are moving those to -- to the 22nd. hTATILT ="6M1VARVIF17-TIVOTIM Zaremba: Do we need to officially amend the agenda? De Weerd: No. When we -- when we get to it we will. Zaremba: Okay. N. Public Hearing for UDC Text Amendment 2015 & Meridian Design Manual Revamp (H-2015-0011) by City of Meridian Planning Division Design Manual Revamp Approved/UDC Text Amendment 1. Request: Text Amendment to the Unified Development Code (UDC) as follows: 1) UDC Sections: Definitions; Residential Dimensional Standards; Fencing; Structure and Site and Multi -Family Design Standards; Common Open Space and Site Amenity Requirements; Specific Use Standards for Drinking Establishments, Flex Space and Home Occupations; Timelines for Signatures on Development Agreements; Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards and Other Miscellaneous Sections; AND 2) Reformat of the Meridian Design Manual Including Reducing Duplicate Guidelines; Removing Site Design and Transportation Related Guidelines; Emphasize Architectural Elements and Change the Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 48 of 70 Name of the Design Manual to the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual De Weerd: Thank you. Okay. Item 7-N is a public hearing for the UDC text amendment to the 2015 Meridian Design Manual revamp. I will note it's H-2015-0011. 1 will turn this over to Bill. Parsons: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The last public hearing item on the agenda tonight is the UDC text amendment and update -- or revamp of the design manual. Staff has been before you on a couple of occasions talking about the revisions that we wanted to take forth not only to our development community, but also to the Planning and Zoning Commission and in front of this body. Tonight's presentation -- we will try to break it into two parts. I will go ahead do my presentation as part of the UDC changes and, then, Brian is also here to assist me to that update to the changes to the design manual and, then, I will follow up -- once Brian concludes his presentation, then, will follow up with what transpired at the Planning and Zoning Commission back on the 19th and, then, I will conclude and stand for any questions that you may have for myself and Brian. So, when we came forward to you back in October we brought forth a table that had all of those listed changes. The slide before you this evening kind of defines -- or depicts the major sections of the code that we are looking to change. The table itself is approximately nine pages. And, again, all of these changes -- or a vast majority of these changes have and were brought forward to the development community, landowners, anyone that does business with the city, so that we could get their input and keep our proposed changes transparent to the community. So, tonight I'm just going to touch on -- and very broadly give you an overview -- you have seen a lot of these. So, the first one that I did want to touch base on was, again, the dimensional standards. I know, again, staff did not -- we brought this forward to you in October. Some of the Council members did have some concerns with the -- some of the minimal dimensional standards that we were proposing at that time. I do have a couple slides in tonight's presentation that kind of shows how the changes would correlate to actual development on the ground and I believe Council's direction was to have staff actually attend a town hall meeting and present those findings and get take from the public how they would perceive the changes to our code and Caleb actually, with Brian's assistance, was able to generate some graphics and take that to that town hall meeting and share that with the community. In particular, I think Council, from what I recall, had concerns with the R-4 standards and that R-8 dimensional standards and so this next slide here really represents -- again, this isn't taking any topography, site constraints, waterways, that would impact certain properties in Meridian. This is, basically, a 17 acre piece of ground and based on our current R-8 dimensional standards this is what we typically get, based our minimal standards today and this is one of the similar graphics that was presented at that town hall meeting. So, you can see here you got 97 units, you get 5.6 dwelling units to the acre and you have approximately 14 percent open space. Keep in mind code requires ten percent. This same graphic, done at the 4,000 square foot minimum lot size, with 40 feet of frontage, you increase density slightly to 6.9 dwelling units to the acre. It looks like open space has an increase and the number of units has gone up from 97 to 120. This is just one example. Staff did not do any other graphics or anything for any of the R-4, the R-15 and Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 49 of 70 the R-40 district. This is just one example that we brought forward. Staff did receive a letter from the BCA and, again, they were in support of the smaller lot sizes, letting kind of the market drive what the community wants to happen. In the presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission, Caleb did mention that the neighbors -- or at least some of the residents that he spoke to at that town hall meeting didn't seem to be very -- didn't really want smaller lots backing up to their larger lots or to their home. They didn't see this as a benefit to the community. I don't know how many residents Caleb talked to, but he didn't seem to get a very well reception from -- from the community. The next item that we talked about at that hearing in October was reference to gravel mining and, again, we are removing that entirely from our ordinance, but we are keeping the definition of gravel mining in our ordinance, so that way if there are any code violations we will have something clearly that we can reference in our code to determine or interpret if that is, in fact, grading the site or is it a commercial mining operation. As we discussed previously -- and this has been a topic for the city in the last year and a half or two, it's our common lot fencing standards and so we are proposing a third option for the development community and we are also proposing to add those graphics to the UDC as well. Planning and Zoning Commission did like that. Mr. Dave Yorgason did testify at the hearing that he would like the flexibility to have options for not requiring fencing for some of those lots that back up to common open space. There is -- certain developers don't like to have fencing off their common lots, but like to have the buildable lots incorporated as part of the common open space or at least front on the open space, so it looks like one large open space rather than walling off that open space and we discussed those options and that right now the way our proposed changes are this evening we are going to require developers to fence all of their common lots, so we don't have the homeowners putting up illegal fencing, we want to make sure that gets in -- put in with development, but there is an opportunity through the alternative compliance process to request that no fencing be allowed along that common open lot and that can be taken up by the director and if we can't support the applicant's position on that, certainly they could take that decision to Council to take direction or action on. So, design standards here. Currently this is a phase one. So, Brian was doing that modification to the design manual. This is, again, phase one where we are taking the design -- the current design standards in the code and we are basically striking all of them and with a future phase two we envision coming back with more robust standards to help with site design standards. Brian will -- our task is really to focus on the architectural design standards and he will touch bases on more -- more on that in his presentation with -- as I get -- finish up my UDC presentation. One thing that we did not bring forth, but came about as a result of a recent road project was the widening of McMillan Road is currently, as the Council knows, we require landscaping along all of our roadways, so a local street primarily the ten foot wide landscape buffer. Collector roads is a 20 foot wide landscape buffer and an arterial street requires a 25 foot wide landscape buffer. Typically when the developer comes in and they want to subdivide a piece of property, they are required to dedicate a certain amount of right of way, but they are not required to improve an arterial roadway, they pay impact fees for that. So, what's happening is if that arterial street is not within ACHD's five year work program, these developers by our code currently requires them to landscape that unimproved right of way, so that we don't have this strip of ground in front of that nice common lot built by the subdivision. Well, this change would require the developer to put that in regardless of Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 50 of 70 whether or not it was in the five year work program and a recent example of that would be with the widening of McMillan Road some of the landscaping that was -- I guess some of the frontage -- the street frontage along McMillan Road did not have the right of way -- unimproved right of way landscape and so ACHD did not put landscaping back in and so the city is essentially stuck with basically compacted dirt and gravel along the side of the road next to the sidewalk and we want to make -- and that's what this is trying to do is make sure we get that landscaping put back in. If the developer put that in with their -- with their development regardless of timing for that right of way improvement, ACH D is willing to put the landscape -- whatever they take out they are willing to replace exactly what they took out. So, this -- this is an effort to make sure that we have beautification along our streets and we don't end up with that example of just gravel or dirt along our entryways or our arterial roadways. And I know BCA had some concerns with that requirement as well. Mr. Yorgason was concerned that would be a throw away cost to the developer, particularly say for example the road is going to be widened within the next year, the developer just went in and put all this money into landscaping and, then, was going in less than a year widening -- ripping out that landscaping in order to widen the road. So, there was some concerns with that. Planning and Zoning Commission stayed with staff's recommendation and kept this provision as is stated -- or presented to you this evening. Open space requirements -- De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Bill, to that point, though, what you're saying -- in that scenario, if that was ripped out six months after it was installed, ACHD would fund the -- the replacement of all that taken out? Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Borton, that -- that's what this is trying to do -- attempt to do, to make sure that is replaced, yes. Last -- one of the last items that I want to touch on -- and I think we talked about this the last several meetings we have had with you as well, is the open space requirements and some of those proposed changes and I won't go into those and the only reason why I kept it in my presentation this evening is because Planning and Zoning Commission did struggle with some of the proposed changes, particularly with that average lot size of 10,000 square feet. They certainly want to make sure that we have attractive developments in the community and we do provide that residential subdivisions have the appropriate amenities and open space for the residents in the community. So, they struggled with that. But, again, there weren't any proposed changes that came -- came about. They were just concerned -- right now the way it reads it's an average lot size, so there could be some lots that are under that 10,000 minimum and some lots that are larger than that. We just don't know until development comes, but you have to hit that at least average lot size of 10,000 square feet in order to take advantage of reducing your open space. But it is the desire of the city to at least -- if you are going to take advantage of large lots that you still meet the intent of the subdivision amenities ordinance that still falls under the same section. With that I don't really have anything else for you, unless you have any questions at this time. If you don't, I will go ahead and turn it over to Brian and he can segue into the Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 51 of 70 design manual and, like I mentioned to you earlier in my presentation, I will summarize with how the Planning and Zoning Commission -- action on this application. De Weerd: Thank you, Bill. Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Just to clarify a couple of things. On the changing in dimensions in the different zoning districts, we are still preserving the original setbacks and things, we are not changing that. Okay. And refresh my memory. Do we -- how do we log common wall buildings? I know we have done it, but is that separately allowed? Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, as stated the setbacks aren't changing, but there is one exception to that. In the R-8 district currently there is a 15 foot setback to the street and staff is proposing that that 15 be reduced down to ten feet. So, that way you get your living area closer to the street and push your garage away from the street to take advantage of the smaller lot size. If you would indulge me on the other question. I'm sorry. Zaremba: How do we allow common -- shared walls, common walls? Parsons: Yeah. A lot of this change, too, is also taking -- the way the R-8 standards are currently in the ordinance if you had attached product as part of your development and zero lot lines -- Zaremba: Yeah. Parsons: -- you could take advantage of a 40 foot wide lot or a 4,000 square foot minimum lot size. But that allows a principally permitted use in an R-8 zone, you just have to tell that to us with the platting of your project and show that on your plat that there is zero lot lines and there is no easements provided along that lot line and -- Zaremba: We are not changing that? Parsons: Not changing that. That would still be a principally permitted use in the R-8 district. Zaremba: More questions if I may and that is is your discussion of fencing, the last thing that you said I didn't totally catch what you said. I'm not sure I heard. Were you talking about the problem that we used to have with double fencing and -- you said something right at the end about that and I didn't catch what you -- Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Zaremba, that's one problem that we are trying to address here, but we also want to build in flexibility and so we want to make sure that fencing gets put in correctly at the time of development, so homeowners are -- it's understandable that they can't double fence that or when you have that common lot fenced off that's your fencing, it's -- there is nothing else you can do to close off the fencing or put up illegal fencing. That's what we are trying to avoid. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 52 of 70 Zaremba: Great. Thank you. De Weerd: Yeah. Additional questions? Mr. Rountree. Rountree: Bill, on the lot size for the R-8, could we memorialize the process that we have done for a number of years with respect to buffers or bordering property that if -- if this proposed dimensional standard change for R-8 abuts an existing R-4 that the lot sizes would be bigger -- will be bigger adjacent to that subdivision to save the heartburn of -- it's going to come in here and somebody is going to say, well, you have a buffering, you need to make the lot sizes larger. We almost always condition that situation and just get it out, so as the developers subdivide and put together their preliminary plats that they take that into consideration and it just becomes part of the process, instead of us being the judge and jury on that, just have it in our process. Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, currently the last couple meetings we were -- we have seen the residents coming and asking for that transition. Now, our comp plan does speak to providing that transition. If you want something in code I'm not sure how to really address that and have staff look for that, other than maybe getting some assurances or go back to my staff or -- and Caleb is here, too. Take it up with the P&Z and say, hey, listen, we are hearing loud and clear from the Council that when plats come forward we really need to stress the importance of transitional lot sizes, particularly when they are up against larger lots, R-4 developments, R-2 developments, or even one acre county development and transition for that as you go to your smaller lots. We can make that an internal policy. I'm not sure how to really wrap that into code for you, unless we add an asterisk or something that says you provide that transition in accordance with the comp plan. I don't know if Caleb has any ideas on that or not, but I know we have -- certainly have enough Comprehensive Plan policies that speak to that and, you know, we have a great artist next to me named Brian. What we could certainly do on our cut sheets. We have cut sheets for our -- each individual land use designation. Maybe we put an asterisk on there and we say, you know, when you butt up against the low density residential, provide that transition, so we at least get that out in front of the development community when we preapp with them and let -- or even property owners when we preapp, say, hey, this is what our expectation is, this is what the city envisions, providing that transition. Rountree: Well, those are all good ideas specifically tonight, but just explore that. Parsons: Absolutely. I don't expect you to address my question Rountree: It's something we are doing. I mean it's just almost every subdivision in that situation we are having to make a special condition. You have to go back and redraw the plat. If you know that's going to happen up front, just get it done, plan out what of kind comments folks might have on that. And the next question I have is on the landscaping and your comment that, well, if the landscaping goes in and ACHD is going to go ahead Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 53 of 70 and they will acquire the landscaping in their right of way, at some point in time work with the future homeowners association -- it's usually not the developer when they are widening a road. And though Ten Mile is not necessarily the example of the setbacks that we require now, are you telling me that ACHD is willing to buy the additional right of way to put in the landscaping when they are widening the road and from the back of sidewalk, a cross section to the back of sidewalk on the other side, they are going from property line to property line, and in order to put landscaping back in, they would have to acquire additional property. Do we have an exception in -- in that particular policy for that situation? Because a lot of the old roadways -- or almost all of the existing roadways pretty much fall in that kind of category if you're going to go from three or two to the full five lane section that we are seeing in a lot of collectors and arterials. Hood: Madam Mayor, Councilman Rountree, regarding the right of way for those projects, I mean that Ten Mile project that was recently completed is a good example. You have -- most of those subdivisions have a landscape buffer and there is not much of one anymore, but they had it. And let me just summarize, because the right of way kind of adds another wrinkle to this. But ACHD's policy -- and this goes to some of the discussion you all had earlier today about the primary benefit of the motorists. If there is not green on the street side of the sidewalk, they cannot patch that back. There is nothing for them to match into. That is their policy. So, there has to be green on the street side -- it can just be a strip, a two foot strip, but if there is not green on that -- now, the back side, because that's something we require in the landscape buffer. But that's why we still want to see this, because I -- don't know if any of you have driven out on McMillan. It's been done for several months now, but you will see on the north side primarily the subdivisions that didn't have -- it was just gravel up to the sidewalk, they put gravel back. Bird: Yeah. Hood: But the ones that had grass, even just a strip or two, they put it back. Now, the right of way, again, throws a little bit of a wrench into your question, but that's generally what this is going to -- ACHD will preserve the right of way with development, so they shouldn't -- going forward, unless something changes from a five lane to a seven lane, that they weren't anticipating, then, we are more into your scenario. But generally preserving the right of way with development requiring that to be set aside, dedicated, so that doesn't create that issue. Rountree: So, is this proposed change clear on that? Hood: I think so. All this does is -- as Bill pointed out, all this does is get rid of the caveat that says if it's in the five year work plan or not. It doesn't say if it's in the five year work plan or not. If it is or isn't, you still need to have grass on the front side of the sidewalk -- Rountree: Okay. Hood: -- really the only thing we are changing here. Because we have got some projects coming in and it was -- and so they didn't put the green in and, then, when ACHD does a Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 54 of 70 project we are like where is the -- where is our landscape strip? There wasn't one there, so we aren't putting one back and -- yeah. So, that isn't -- parks didn't want to buy it and maintain it, so it's like -- so, that's the intent of the section. Rountree: Thank you for the explanation. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Bill, on our R -4s now existing with the 8,000 square feet, what -- what kind of units are we getting per acre now? About 3.5, 3.7 or something? Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Bird, I would say anywhere from high twos, low threes. Bird: Okay. So, the developers can, basically, pick up another unit on that per acre; is that right? If they are getting three now, they can pick up another -- De Weerd: On these dimensional standards I know a lot of discussion comes up generally in the R-8. I'm not understanding maybe why we are fiddling with the R-4 or the R-2. Parsons: Madam Mayor, it came down from the development community. They were looking at some of their suggestions at our UDC focus group. They had suggested some of these ideas, so we figured since we were toying with changing some of the other dimensional standards we would look at the other ones. But certainly we don't have to change anything if the Council doesn't want to this evening on those. We don't really get a lot of R-2 in the city and if we do we typically don't require a development agreement either, because it's such a low density development, probably our least -- our least restrictive for a residential development, it's just a large lot development. We don't get -- if they never developed it, the way they brought it forward, then, they come back and replat it. So, again, that's just something that Mrs. McKay brought up at our -- at our meeting. It gives it a little more lots out of their projects if they go that way. Thought maybe we would get more variety, more of an R-2 mix into the community. Particularly on the fringe. De Weerd: So, they are looking for the flexibility and lot size design, not necessarily greater density, but more diversity? Parsons: I think that's all of our goals. I mean even the city, plus the UDC focus group is we do want to get -- again, we want densities to reflect what -- what our code says, because right now we have maximum densities in our ordinance and we want to get those densities in line with that and we want to prevent developers having -- coming before you -- it almost goes to your example this evening where we put a unit count on a lot and the homeowner -- or the homeowners think that that's the maximum or the minimum -- the maximum lot number -- or maximum units they can have. What we are trying to prevent Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 55 of 70 here -- and I think you have seen in the last couple -- over the last couple years having people come in with an R-8 development, but request an R-15 zoning district, because it's the same thing, the community comes out and says you're doing R-15 with 15 units to the acre. Why are you getting R-15? And that's to them -- that's high density development in our community and so that's why we have also proposed some of these changes as well, to try to avoid those situations, so we don't have to up zone the property just to meet -- to get them relief from a different dimension -- or different residential district. De Weerd: Yeah. But at least they have an option available to do it different. My concern is would we do this -- with the exception of some of our better developers, this becomes the standard, so -- Parsons: And certainly that's one thing that our Planning and Zoning Commission talked about or at least I brought up there is when you -- when you get these smaller and narrower lots you have to pay particular attention to the design of the homes, because you take that five foot setback off each side of that lot, you end up with a 30 foot wide lot -- or home on a 40 foot wide lot. So, it's -- design is going to be crucial. Absolutely. Or you get more of the attached product that we all want to get, so we can have -- you kind of do that transition where you have single family attached homes on the perimeter and, then, almost like at Heritage Grove over there on Ustick and Locust Grove where they have the MEW lots, the alley loaded lots in the middle, but still have your traditional single family around the boundaries. I think that's the ultimate goal here. But, like you said, you have good developers and you have developers that want to do the minimums and it's hard to have that balance, that fine line, with minimum lot sizes sometimes. De Weerd: Can we just go to the open space? I'm not sure I understand what the proposed changes are. Maybe everyone else tracked it and, I'm sorry, I don't feel well tonight, so I'm trying to follow things, but that one was one that completely lost me. Parsons: That's okay. I will try to explain it a little bit better for you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. So, currently -- the current UDC standards require any property under five acres typically we don't get an amenity or we don't get open space. Anything between five and 20 we get ten percent -- the code requires ten percent open space -- De Weerd: Okay. Then I do understand today's standards. I just don't understand the proposed one. Parsons: So, our proposed changes -- basically, if you come in with a large lot development -- in our world a large lot development of 10,000 -- your plat has to be R-2 basic -- I know we say average 10,000 square foot lots, but R-2 is what you're going to probably end up with. So, if you have an R-2 development for this you wouldn't necessarily be required to do the ten percent open space. De Weerd: Oh. Okay. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 56 of 70 Parsons: Because you have bigger lots, you have bigger backyards for the kids to recreate. So, we will give them that. So, if you have this type style of development you don't need to meet the ten percent open space, but you still have to meet the amenity requirements and that's really all -- all that we are saying here. Anything else, R-4, R-8 developments would still have to comply with that ten -- ten percent. De Weerd: Okay. So, you're basically only adding a fourth bullet under the UDC standards that for R-2 or those averaging 10,000 square feet you don't need to meet the use. Parsons: Yes. And if it's an annexation we can always still require something more than just what the applicant proposes, too, but this is an attempt to try to give them a little more flexibility to these larger lot type style development. De Weerd: Thank you. Any other questions for Bill? Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: On the lot sizes -- R-4, if we reduce that from 60 feet to 50 feet, your comment a little while ago about deducting the setbacks, 50 feet with a five inch setback -- five foot setback on each side would allow a buildable front of 40 feet. Typically in R-4 are three car garages, which are going to take up anywhere between 27 and 30 feet of that 40 feet. So, we are talking about having an entryway or the rest of the front of the building that's only ten feet wide, maybe 13 feet wide. Is that -- is that okay? Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, we see it all over the community, you know, a lot of those patio homes sometimes they have -- will get a tandem garage. I'm not sure of what the dimensional standards are for that project south of -- Sawtooth Village, Arch Rock, they had some townhomes along Linder, I believe, and, then, as you transition there is some single family -- I think there is some three -- three car garages, but I don't design homes, so -- I know I look at them, but I don't -- I don't know, maybe we have some developers here that could probably answer some of those questions if they want to get up and testify on anything, but typically -- that's a good point as well. But certainly you're going to get two story homes with living space over the garage if you need to get square footage on that lot and that's typically what -- what I have seen on -- either get patio homes with an extra deep two car garage or you get a two story with a tandem garage with living over that and a bonus room upstairs is basically what I have seen in Meridian since I have been reviewing some home plans for those communities out there. Zaremba: Okay. De Weerd: Okay. If there is nothing further, we will move to Brian. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 57 of 70 McClure: Madam Mayor, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, thank you for having me here tonight. I'm here to speak with you about design review, more specifically design manual overhaul and what is now referred to as the architectural standards manual. I discussed this with Council several times now, so I am going to try and be brief. So, why the overhaul? We wanted to streamline the design manual, we wanted to emphasize consistent application. Wanted to recategorize existing items and correlate with city policy and to eliminate duplicates and consolidate some similar items for which there are many, to focus on building design elements and, then, to create express standards. Lastly -- and it's kind of a next step is to relocate site development through either the Comprehensive Plan or the Unified Development Code. Since the last Council update there have been a few minor revisions. I removed a few paragraphs from the introduction. I highlighted this in your memo, but the intent for that is to relocated the text to the UDC in an upcoming phase, it is not to get rid of it. The same application standard as in process -- it's still envisioned. We don't want to change that. We just don't want to -- necessarily want to have to change it again if the wording gets tweaked a little when they go to the UDC. And for the standards themselves, we made some minor grammatical tweaks. There were no significant changes. Just some minor formatting occurred and, then, a bunch of new photos were added. Public involvement briefly. Early on we had a design manual work group. There were a series of meetings over several months, beginning in December of 2014. After we completed a draft, additional invitations to comment were sent out. There was broader outreach to design firms and, then, we also attended a BCA meeting and provided them with all of our -- or at least working documents. In terms of the formal application before the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 19th, they recommended approval of the UDC revision to enable this document, which is really what this is about. And, then, finally, we are here today. Finally, kind of next steps, as part of this overhaul it allows site design elements that were not applicable at design review were removed from the old design manual. These will be revisited later and incorporated in either the UDC or the Comprehensive Plan. So, the ones that are more specific can go to the UDC and the ones that are more kind of vague or general would go to the Comprehensive Plan potentially. Some of them may, some of them we are keeping. Additionally UDC changes would also have to occur to formalize some of the processes, such as the new design standards exceptions. I touched on this last time, but, essentially, that's a form of alternative compliance that lends itself more to creative design freedom and latitude to approve. Any other ideas you want to do and not because it won't sit on the site. And, lastly, tonight is -- staff is seeking approval to reference this new document within the UDC. With that, if there is anymore detail questions I would be happy to answer that. Again I will come with this again, so I don't want to bore you, though, if you're good with it. And with that I will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you, Brian. Council, any questions? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 58 of 70 Borton: Brian, if you mentioned it earlier, I apologize, but who in the development community do you reach out to for a project like this -- oftentimes the BCA isn't necessarily the best spokesman for the development community. McClure: The BCA -- Madam Mayor, Councilman Borton, the BCA -- we sent some drafts and they -- you're right, they are the builders and not necessarily the people who are designing these buildings, so they will build whatever they are given. But we were -- just standard protocol for us to approach the BCA and involve them. The earlier stages of the design work group we approached -- we sent out e-mails to people who were serving on the design review committee. We haven't used that in a while, but we invited all of them and, then, the additional -- I'm trying to think of what else we might have -- we had a -- we had a developer in there and, then, we had another -- and the architects that have been working with staff. So, they helped kind of steer with us initially and, then, afterwards we sent it to a whole lot of architects, that we could find, and that was how we reached the other architects. We didn't really receive any comments from any of them in terms of the broader outreach, but we did try. Borton: And similar outreach to the developers themselves? McClure: The developers themselves we only approached the BCA. There were a number of them included on the broader outreach as well, but, yeah, we didn't -- the development community in general we didn't make a -- we didn't aggressively outreach to them. The Mayor originally had asked us to speak with the realtors. We weren't really sure how to do that and Caleb sent out an e-mail to a realtor contact, he said he would send it to others, and, again, we didn't hear any feedback at all. We did try that. I'm not really sure where that went after the e-mail went out, but -- yeah, that's -- did I answer your question? Borton: You did. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I think, Councilman Borton, hitting BCA -- because in housing it's a little different than commercial to the fact that most of the builders hire the architects that draw it and they have a lot of say on what the house is going to be, along with the owners, so I -- I think Brian covered it -- covered the area pretty dang good on this. McClure: Madam Mayor, Councilman Bird, just a note. The BCA -- Mr. Yorgason was supportive of the project at the last meeting as well and just to make sure we are clear on it, I said this last time as well. How we approach residential design is not changing from what we do currently, so currently single family homes are not -- there is no design review required, unless Council has directed that to occur. That is how it remains moving forward. So, like the previous design manual which has had single family residential standards, but were only applied when Council asked for them to be. The manual has Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 59 of 70 single family residential standards, but they only apply when Council directs us to apply it. So, nothing is really changing there in terms of single family homes. De Weerd: Anything further from Council? Any questions? This is a public hearing. Is there any member of the public who would like to testify? Our resident testifier, for the lack of -- Turnbull: Madam Mayor, David Turnbull. Brighton Corporation. 12601 West Explorer Drive in Boise. De Weerd: Thank you. Turnbull: Yeah, I didn't come here for this. I have been participating in parts of both of these processes. You know, there seemed to be a few questions on some dimensional standards. I would be happy to give you my take or input or answer any questions on garage sizes or anything that you might have like that. I would say on the design review this is primarily a commercial focused effort here. It's kind of impossible for me to attend all of these hearings and keep up with all that's going on, but we did have one of the architects that we use quite a bit Cornell Larsen involved in that and he would sort of report back to me and I think he may have been one of the more active participants. You know, as far as the BCA, that's really not their thing, they are into residential home building. A few of them do some commercial building, but it's more commercial developers like ourselves or commercial architects like Cornell Larsen that probably have the best input there. The realtors -- you know, if you ever need to get a hold of them, Miguel Legarreta is probably the right contact there or you can go up to their statewide association as well. You know, I think that -- just a couple of comments on some of the things that were reviewed in the UDC. I think the issue of what does R-4 mean, what does R-8 mean, I think that those dimensional standard changes were probably more to get the density in line with the underlying designation, so with an R-8 -- you know, I will give you Century Farm as an example. That is an R-8 zone, but we are getting three units to the acre. So, it was more of a public perception thing, I guess, if you want to look at it that way, because sometimes when people see R-8 they think, well, we are going to get eight units to the acre and it's virtually impossible to get eight units to the acre with the R-8 dimensional standards. So, the only way you could look at it is just redesignate your -- you know, keep the same dimensional standards and relable them, too. That's another way you could look at it. I would say -- and this is just our experience -- if we are doing single family housing, single family detached housing -- we tried one project with 46 foot wide lots in a PUD, but that didn't work particularly well from a home design standpoint. So, our standard right now in our company is this smallest frontage we would do, basically, if you measure to the setback -- street frontages can be a little bit different than the setback frontage. The narrowest we will do a single family detached is 50 feet. Fifty foot wide lot. If you get narrower than that -- in my opinion you want to get quality architectural design, you probably ought to go to attached, so that you combine those frontages and so you have some opportunity to create some interest in the entry and not be totally garage dominated front. So, that's -- you know, I would be happy to answer any questions you might have there. Fencing was brought up on common areas. My Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 60 of 70 personal opinion is that as long as there is an alternative compliance element there, there are a lot of times where we have done common areas where we don't think it's really appropriate to have fencing and I know what the concern is with the fencing, somebody else will throw up a fence, but if you have an alternative compliance method where your CC&Rs or something like that that fencing can be either not allowed or that if it is install it's to a certain design standard, then, that might solve that. And, then, the open space question was something that probably I brought up, because in the previous -- and I can't even remember what the resolution is on this one, but we have done some large projects where we have done -- you know, you're counting amenities, but we put in a clubhouse that costs, you know, what, a million dollars plus and that counts as one amenity, when it really should count as several. So, we talked about how do -- you know, do we go to a point system and we didn't want to get too complicated, but that's sort of the difficulties you run into when you take one standard that -- and apply it to all. So, you know, is a pool that costs 100,000 dollars one amenity versus somebody putting in a little park with a park bench and a picnic table. Just doesn't seem to equate. So, there, again, maybe an alternative compliance method is the appropriate way to look at it. Like I said, I didn't come here to testify, but just listening to the presentation and some of your questions that is the input I would give you. And I will stand for any questions if you have any. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Bird: I have none. Rountree: No, but I appreciate your -- De Weerd: Great comments. Bird: Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. This is a public hearing and I don't see anyone else in the public that looks like they are dying to provide feedback or comment. Council, any other questions for staff or Mr. Turnbull? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Seeing none, I move we close the public hearing on UDC Text Amendment 2015 and Design Manual Revamp H-2015-0011. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 7-N. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 61 of 70 Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I want to make a statement to our staff. Brian, Bill and Caleb, all you guys have done a superb job on this. I appreciate all the work you have put into it and stuff and you covered all the bases for us. De Weerd: Dean is looking pretty nervous over there. You need to articulate. Bird: Anyway, thank you guys very much. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: With respect to the design standard manual, what's happened is the original intent of the design guideline that was created was to give you a place and as we work through it find -- find all the bugs and work those out and, hopefully, the same group of architects and folks that spend a lot of time originally on this. The intent of having this was to get this body out of the design business and it's happened and it's been a good thing think. And I appreciate staff's work and, Brian, especially, your work in coordinating that and Bill and Caleb, the work you have done as well. And I think it's been successful and it's been successful to me in that it has morphed into something hopefully better and reflects the things that are working and got rid of the things that weren't. So, I think that's a good thing. With respect to the UDC revamp, I -- I would like you to explore the -- the border or buffer comment that I made about dimensional standards. I would like to see the -- the R-4 stay the same. R-8 could go down and just for some flexibility of housing types and just because it's R-8 and it says -- David mentioned doesn't mean that it has to be that, so I was looking, thinking do some things with larger lots and architecture, but maybe have some setbacks that are different, but make them work well. So, that would be my recommendation at least for the R-4. Go ahead and work the other five categories with respect to the changes. On the amenities, I think you have gone the right direction with the larger lots. I think we do need to define what -- what an amenity is in terms of -- and I think, David, you represented it rather well that, you know, is a swimming pool or a clubhouse an amenity, as opposed to a bench and jungle gym. Pretty significant difference in terms of space and expense and usability to the community that it's in. So, if you can explore some way to -- I don't think it needs to be a dollar and cents thing, but to expand that definition that a clubhouse might offset a certain amount of open space. Or a swimming pool and adjoining meeting space or whatever would possibly eliminate some -- some or most of the empty space, with the exception of maybe the entranceway or a boulevard or a collector into the community. But have that be the focus of the open space in the area. Again, that's just a thought and you don't have to do what I'm saying, but I just would like you to think about that. I really have a tough time seeing that you might Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 62 of 70 just as well do away with the R-4 if you bring it down that low, because it -- the products are going to begin to all look the same in the R-4 at any rate. De Weerd: Any comments from Council? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: To echo Councilman Rountree and -- on the amenities. I think we really need to look at what the amenities are putting in and how we can -- you know, a pool and a clubhouse and stuff like that is quite -- an amenity and, then, to stack other stuff on top of it don't seem fair, so -- and I'm like him, I -- I can change everything but the R-4. I just -- -- you may as well just have all R-8. De Weerd: Really? Bird: That's what you would end up with. Milam: Oh. No. You didn't mean that. De Weerd: Is that a motion? Milam: No. Bird: No. Borton: For the record. Bird: It's for the record. De Weerd: He was just mumbling, Dean. Bird: Yeah. Don't put that down. De Weerd: Any other comments from Council? Rountree: Madam Mayor, with respect to the motion on this item, because it's been ask for approval and there is portions of it that I think we can approve and portions of it that we would like staff to take additional work on. De Weerd: Can you talk into your microphone. Rountree: I will move over two inches, so it can hear me. So, I would move that we -- can we approve a portion and direct staff to -- okay. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 63 of 70 Nary: Yes. Rountree: Madam Mayor, I would move that we approve the design manual revamp and its inclusion in mentioning in the UDC and direct staff to consider our comments with respect to the UDC text amendment and bring some clarification back to us. Do you have a date? Do we need a date certain? De Weerd: Can we make those two separate motions or do they have to be together? Milam: If you want to get it done this year, then, you might want to -- Nary: They could be done -- probably should be done separately. Rountree: Okay. All right. Then I move that we approve the design manual revamp and its inclusion by reference in the UDC. Milam: Second. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second regarding the design review of the UDC. Any discussion? Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we have staff consider the discussion this evening and bring back a final recommendation with respect to the comments made on the proposed UDC text changes. Bird: Second. Rountree: And, then, a date certain? Nary: Well, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, unless you're going to do it next week, which I don't think -- is a little ambitious, they will just have to renotice it for a future one. I don't know of any other way to do it. Rountree: I don't have a 2016 calendar, but I would say for January -- is it the 11th? Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 64 of 70 Milam: 12th. 19th. 26th. De Weerd: The workshop on the 12th or -- 19th. 26th. Rountree: Bring that back to the Council on January 19th, 2016. Bird: Second agrees. De Weerd: Okay. Any discussion? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Joe. Borton: The weight afforded to amenities, the discussion sounded kind of quaintish, like you allocate points for a clubhouse, versus a tot lot. If that's not the direction, it probably would be helpful to staff. Or if that is the direction. One way or the other on how you're going to allocate the weight of -- De Weerd: Quaintish. Sounds kind of -- JflF NW41N=ff , r9Ma Rountree: Madam Mayor, I didn't mean to be pointed. I meant it that I know the creativity of staff and they will come with a solution that works or they will make -- they will continue with the recommendations they have, because it is a workable model for them. Parsons: I guess, Madam Mayor, for my clarification, just so I make sure I bring back the correct information. One, talking about maybe having something in the ordinance about transition lot sizes when you butt up against an R-4 or R-2 development. Rountree: Correct. Parsons: Maybe explore as far as regards to the R-8 standards or the R-4, it seems like Council is leaning on just leaving that alone, so -- Rountree: Correct. Parsons: -- really nothing to explore there. And, then, it sounds like a point system, essentially, for the open, meaning a credit has been -- if you put in a clubhouse and a pool, you did five percent opens space or something to that effect. I know I have played around with some of that language. I have kind of a draft of that started. I don't know if that's the perfect solution at this time. But certainly I can reopen that drawing board and see what we can do, Caleb and myself. I mean look at that. Those are probably the two items. It's just the -- Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 65 of 70 Rountree: You covered it think rather well, Bill. De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I just would like to clarify what I think I heard on the R-4 and the R-8. I would be supportive of not changing the R-4 requirements from what they currently are. I would be supportive of changing the R-8 requirements. So, it's not changing the four, but do change the eight. Parsons: Yeah. Leave it as is. Zaremba: Is that what you were saying? Parsons: Yes. Leave it as -- Zaremba: Okay. Parsons: Leave everything dimensional standards to what is here, except for the R -- R-8 district is what I heard. De Weerd: Uh-huh. Zaremba: Works for me. De Weerd: Okay. There is a motion and a second to continue this to next month on the 19th. So, all those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Just to add a comment, I, too, appreciate all the work that staff is putting into this. This is a continuing and evolving project, but I also wanted to recommend -- recognize the time and effort that Mr. Turnbull puts into many of our things. He was on the committee that helped write the UDC. He has stayed involved in making good recommendations about what works and what doesn't and has been very generous of sharing his time and his knowledge with the city staff and Council and everybody else and just wanted to recognize -- I, for one, appreciate the comments that he makes and the help that he's been. Rountree: I will second that motion. De Weerd: I will third. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 66 of 70 Milam: Third. Bird: Fourth, fifth, sixth. Milam: All those in favor -- oh. Bird: It's nice to have somebody involved like that. De Weerd: I appreciate your comment, Mr. Zaremba, and thank you, Mr. Turnbull. Our thanks to staff as well for your diligence and making sure the I's are dotted and the T's are crossed and that you go out and seek feedback and that's appreciated. Item 8: Department Reports A. Strategic Plan Update Moved to December 22, 2015 B. Quarterly Dashboard Discussion De Weerd: So, with that said we will move into Item 8-C. I will just -- I don't think we have to have a motion to move department reports. C. Police Department: Budget Amendment for the Purchase of a Replacement Canine to Service the Needs of the City, for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $8,000.00 De Weerd: So, we are looking at under the police department and, lieutenant, are you going to comment on this? De St. Germain: Yes. We purchased two dogs back in October 2014. One of the dogs is skittish and just can't go up stairs and we have tried everything. We have had other handlers work with him and he just cannot operate from high levels. We put him up on tables and he just shuts down immediately. So, we had a warranty on the dog for five years. We contacted the company, they are going to give us a replacement dog and, then, started not returning our phone calls. So, we contacted legal. They have sent a letter and a demand by December 9th I think it was and we have no response from them whatsoever. So, we have got a handler with a dog that doesn't meet our standards. So, we would like 8,000 dollars to purchase another dog from a more reputable canine vendor. De Weerd: Thank you. So, you have one that does the ground work, but doesn't want to do anymore than that? De St. Germain: It's amazing. You get him on just a second floor and that dog just shuts down and lays down and won't do the same things that he does -- we took him to the fire station and put him up the stairs, he won't go past the third stair. He starts tugging to go Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 67 of 70 back down again. So, I don't know why we didn't pick that up in the beginning, but Berle said we put him through the drills and he passed all the basic drills, but the dog can't function at this time. Borton: Madam Mayor? Iplay,kyf @MLVAImo: • • Borton: You're going to get a dog from a different vendor, I presume? De St. Germain: Pardon me? Borton: From a different vendor? De St. Germain: Oh, yes. Borton: Yeah. De St. Germain: This vendor I think is going bankrupt. They purchased a lot of dogs for the Army and I think they didn't do their finances well and so they have not returned any of our phone calls. We have all called them. We have mailed them. And, then, finally we contacted legal to send them a demand letter. De Weerd: Okay. Cavener: Madam Mayor? Question. What happens to the dog? De St. Germain: What we are going to try to do is we are going to put him on the POST site and offer him to an agency like BLM that doesn't go out -- they are on land all the time and he's a good drug dog, but he's not a good bite dog. So, they use him out in the BLM area I think he will function well and we would have to give him to them at a reduced rate. Try and get some of our money back and, then, see what happens with legal. Cavener: Thanks. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we approve a budget amendment for the purchase of a replacement canine for the not to exceed amount of 8,000 dollars. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Madam Clerk. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 68 of 70 Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9: Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 15-1666: An Ordinance (AZ 15-012 Graycliff Estates) of the City of Meridian Granting Annexation and Zoning for a Parcel of Land Containing 52.46 Acres more or less, located in the SE'/4 of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise, Ada County, Idaho from RUT to R-8 (Medium Density Residential District) and R-40 (High Density Residential District) in the Meridian City Code De Weerd: Item 9-A is ordinance 15-1666. Madam Clerk, will you, please, read this ordinance by title. Holman: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 15-1666, an ordinance AZ 15-012, Graycliff Estates for annexation and rezone of a parcel of land located in the SE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise, Ada County, Idaho as described in Attachment A and annexing certain lands and territories situated in Ada County, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, as requested by the City of Meridian, establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of said lands from RUT to R-8, Medium Density Residential District, and R-40, High Density Residential District, in the Meridian City Code. Providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder and the Idaho State Tax Commission as required by law and providing for a summary of the ordinance and providing for a waiver of the reading rules and providing an effect date. De Weerd: You have heard this read by title. Is there a motion to approve? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve Ordinance No. 15-1666 with suspension of rules. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 9-A. Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 69 of 70 De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. B. Ordinance No. 15-1667: An Ordinance (RZ 13-016 DaVinci Park) for the Rezone of a Parcel of Land Being Portions of the NE 1/4 of the NE'/4 of Lot 7, Crestwood Subdivision No. 1, Located in Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of C -N (Neighborhood Business) and R-8 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning Districts in the Meridian City Code De Weerd: 9-B is Ordinance 15-1667. Madam Clerk, will you read this by title only. Holman: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 15-1667, an Ordinance RZ 13-016, DaVinci Park for the rezone of a parcel of land being portions of the NE '/4 of the NE '/4 of Lot 7, Crestwood Subdivision No. 1, Located in Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of C -N, Neighborhood Business Zoning District, and R-8, Medium Density Residential Zoning District, in the Meridian City Code. Providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder and the Idaho State Tax Commission as required by law and providing for a summary of the ordinance and providing for a waiver of the reading rules and providing an effect date. De Weerd: You have heard this ordinance read by title only. Any discussion from Council? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move we approve Ordinance No. 15-1667 with suspension of rules. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-B. Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Rountree, yea; Bird, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. Meridian City Council December 15, 2015 Page 70 of 70 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: We are at the end of our agenda, Council. Bird: Madam Mayor, I move we adjourn. Rountree: Second. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:28 P.M. (AUD G -RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR T1 -"Y De WEE DATE APPROVED �UtAT=,DgiJ,Crs l!a ATTEST: �p �4- k / / a City O( JAYCEE HOLMAN, CITY CLEC K �. SEAL, A ;RF,�s��`��; a'� Item #7F: Jackson Headquarters Vacation (H-2015.0028) Application(s): ➢ Vacation Property location: The site is located at 3410 and 3500 W. Commercial Court. Summary of Request: The applicant requests to vacate a portion (10'X 1353) of the 10 -foot wide public utility and drainage easement located on the east boundary of Lot 3, Block 2, and the west boundary of Lot 4, Block 2 that is platted with the Commerce Park Subdivision. The remaining PUDI easement will remain along the shared property line. Approval of the subject vacation application will remove a portion of the PUDI easement and allow the applicant to submit for a building permit to construct an addition to an existing industrial/office building. All public utilities (Idaho Power, Cable One, Intermountain Gas) with the exception of Centurylink (who did not respond to requests) have given consent to relinquish the portion of said easement. The Nampa Meridian Irrigation District has stated they have no jurisdiction over the easement area. Staff did ask that the applicant provide a letter from Centurylink prior to tonight's hearing. To this point, staff has not received such a letter. (With the inclusion of the letter from Centurylink stating approval of the easement vacation), staff recommends approval of vacating the easements as proposed. Written Testimony: None Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: None Notes: Item VG: South Meridian Annexation (H-2015-0019) Application(s): ➢ Annexation and Zoning Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 1,322 acres of land currently zoned RUT in Ada County, and is generally located along W. Amity Road, east of S. Linder Road, west of S. Eagle Road and north of E. Columbia Road. Land Use & Zoning: The subject properties are generally rural residential in nature. Some are developed with residences or are being farmed; several of the properties have commercial/industrial type uses operating from them. History: The City has not previously processed any applications on any of these properties. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, Mixed-use Community, Mixed-use Regional, Mixed-use Non-residential, and Civic. Summary of Request: The City of Meridian Planning Division, with consent from all of the subject property owners, has applied for annexation of approximately 1322.14 acres of land from the RUT zoning district in Ada County to the R-4 (Medium -low density residential) (1241.10 acres); R-8 (Medium -density residential) (10.37 acres); R-15 (Medium high-density residential) (30.10 acres) and C -G (General retail and service) (40.57 acres) zoning districts. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: a. Testimony (according to sign in sheet): i. In favor: Mari Taysom, Robin Willeman, Brian White (neutral); Carl and Bonnie Reiterman, Susan Blomberg, Kurin Ramis and Cynthia Davis ii. In opposition: Ronald Galloway iii. Commenting: Kent Mills, Gary Hanson (opposition), Jay Christensen, Dave Taysom, Gordon Hamilton and Aaron Raap iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Caleb Hood vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. District boundaries between the established Fire Districts, the Kuna School District and West Ada School District and how/if those are affected with the proposed annexation boundary. ii. Future development of the City park site. c. Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. None d. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. None Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Recommendation: Approval Notes: Item #7H: Shelburne Subdivision No.1 (H-2015-0004) Application(s): ➢ Final Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 19.42 acres of land, zoned R-4, located east of S. Eagle Road off of E. Zaldia Ln., north of E. Amity Road. Summary of Request: The proposed final plat depicts 48 new building lots & 12 common area lots. All of the proposed lots are for single-family detached homes & comply with the dimensional standards of the R-4 district. There are 2 existing homes and an accessory structure on this site that are proposed to remain on lots within the subdivision. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat and fount the number of buildable lots and common area are the same as shown on the preliminary plat; therefore, staff finds the proposed final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat. A condition of approval of the preliminary plat required an emergency access to be provided for any development over 40 building lots. The applicant has submitted a recorded emergency access easement over the adjacent property owned by the Taylor's in compliance with this requirement. Written Testimony: Katie Miller (response to staff report) Staff Recommendation: Approval w/conditions in the staff report w/one change: • Delete site specific condition #5.b, "Remove the westernmost driveway/street stub street shown at the north boundary of the site as it was not approved with the preliminary plat and not shown on the final plat" and add a new condition under site specific #4 as follows: "A driveway easement shall be depicted across Block 1 for the existing driveway for the property at 3550 E. Zaldia Ln." Notes: Item #71: Una Mas (H-2015.0016) Application(s): ➢ Development Agreement Modification Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 9.5 acres of land, zoned C -G, located at the southwest corner of E. Ustick Road and N. Records Ave. History: This property was annexed with a DA in 2005. Summary of Request: The applicant requests a modification to the DA to remove the portion of DA provision #5.1.12 that requires all buildings to be in substantial conformance with the elevations presented at the April 4, 2006 hearing and have similar modulation and treatments to those elevations as determined by the Planning Director. Because the City has adopted design standards since this project's approval in 2006, the quality of design for this development can be ensured through design review as currently required in the DA and by the UDC with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application(s). Written Testimony: Glenn Walker (in agreement w/staff report) Staff Recommendation: Approval of the proposed DA modification Notes: Item #7K: Twelve Oaks Center Subdivision (H-2015.0025) Application(s): ➢ Short Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 1.44 acres of land, zoned C -C, located on the south side of W. Franklin Road, approximately'/4 mile west of S. Linder Road. History: The proposed subdivision is a re -subdivision on Lot 1, Block 1 of Twelve Oaks Sub. Summary of Request: The proposed plat consists of 4 building lots. All of the proposed lots comply with the dimensional standards of the C -C and TN -R district as applicable, and is in substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in the UDC for short plats. Written Testimony: Carl Porter, Applicant's Representative (in agreement w/staff report) Staff Recommendation: Approval w/conditions in staff report Notes: Item #7L: TM Creek East — AZ, MDA (H-2015.0018) Application(s): ➢ Annexation & Zoning ➢ Development Agreement Modification Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 14.93 acres of land, currently zoned RUT in Ada County, and is generally located on the south side of W. Franklin Road, approximately'/4 mile east of S. Ten Mile Road. Summary of Request:: The applicant requests approval to annex & zone 14.93 acres of land with an R-40 zoning district consistent with the corresponding FLUM designation of HDR for this site. The applicant proposes to develop multi -family residential uses on this site. A conceptual development plan was submitted that depicts high density multi -family residential use of the subject property with arrows depicting internal and external circulation and the general alignment of a future mid -mile collector on the property to the east. A subsequent conditional use permit application will be required for approval of a multi -family development in the R-40 zoning district. Staff is not recommending a new DA as a provision of annexation; however, the applicant is proposing a concurrent modification to the DA for TM Creek, the development approved to the west of this site that is under the same ownership, to incorporate the subject property in that agreement. Staff recommends a few new provisions are added to the DA that pertain to development of the subject property including but not limited to the following: provide cross -access between properties, construct a multi -use pathway along the north side of the Ten Mile Creek, subdivide the property prior to issuance of any building permits, and provide an overall target density of at least 16-25 dwelling units/acre. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Mike Wardle ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Gary Hanson iv. Written testimony: Mike Wardle Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: None Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: None Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: None Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Notes: Item #7M: Calnon Properties — AZ, CPAM (H-2015.0017) Application(s): ➢ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ➢ Annexation & Zoning Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of approximately 54 acres of land, currently zoned RUT in Ada County, located at 2215 W. Franklin Road. Summary of Request: The applicant proposes to amend the FLUM contained in the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation on 40.06 acres of land from MHDR and HDR to MU -Commercial; and 15.49 acres of land from MDR, MHDR, and HDR to MU -Residential. Annexation & zoning of 55.55 acres of land with the C -C (40.06 acres), TN -C (5.46 acres) & TN -R (10.03 acres) zoning districts is also requested. A concept plan was submitted that depicts retail, office & service commercial uses within the proposed MU -C area and professional office/MHDR uses within the proposed MU -R area. Arrows depicting internal and external circulation and the general alignment of a future mid -mile collector street are also depicted. In mixed use areas, development is required to integrate the 3 major use categories (residential, commercial & employment). The MU -C area does not include a residential component & the MU -R area does not include a commercial component as required. Professional office combined with MHDR at a density of 8-15 units/acre is depicted on a small portion of the site but does not commit to a minimum number of units. As is with the current residential land use designations, a target density of 508 dwelling units could be expected for this area. With the proposed change to the FLUM, this number is substantially decreased to approximately 136 units. [These calculations assume development with a 25% loss to infrastructure & open space and the average target density of each land use designation less the land area owned by NMID where the Vaughn Lateral is located & the creek.] As a compromise between the applicant's proposal and the higher density of residential uses currently designated & anticipated for this area, Staff recommends a change from the MU -C land use designation proposed south of the Ten Mile Creek and west of the future collector street to MU -R consistent with that proposed on the east side of the collector street. This will ensure a higher density of residential uses in this area which will contribute to the mix of uses required in the MU -R designation. [Within MU -C areas, no more than 30% of the land area should be residential; within MU -R areas, no more than 40% of the land area should be non-residential.] While not necessarily the burden of this application area, it should be understood that cumulative changes to this area of the TMISAP, east of Ten Mile Road, have likely resulted in the loss of employment and residential densities needed to support transit supportive development. The loss of employment and residential acreage, and the loss of transit supportive densities, may limit future transportation services and have long-range transportation implications. However, realizing a significant, higher -density residential component is still important to the long-term viability of the area. Cumulative changes to future land uses within the Ten Mile Interchange have resulted in significantly more commercial property than originally planned. With both employment and residential densities lessened, in this application area and elsewhere within the specific area plan, it is unclear how a further reduction of residential acreage and increased commercial acreage, can be supported within this area of Meridian. In accord with Staffs recommended change to the FLUM for the 9.3 acre area south of the creek and west of the future collector street, Staff recommends a zoning change from the proposed C -C to the R-40 district. Further, Staff recommends a slight reconfiguration of the proposed TN -C and TN -R districts as follows: a total of 6.9 acres of TN -C zoning on either side of the future collector street south of the creek at a depth of 300 feet from centerline; and 6.5 acres of TN -R zoning on the remainder of the site south of the creek & east of the collector street and TN -C zoning. This leaves 32.9 acres of C -C zoning on the north side of the creek. The R-40 zoning will enable the development of HDR uses as desired in this area which will merge with that to the west for a larger development area. This zoning should be compatible with future development to the south in the C -G &TN -C districts, to the north in the C -C district and to the east in the TN -C district. The TN -C and TN -R zoning will accommodate the office/MHDR uses proposed by the applicant. The TN -C zoning will allow traditional neighborhood style development on either side of the collector street which will provide a transition from development in the C -C zone to the north and will merge with the future traditional neighborhood uses to the south. It will also allow for a wide variety of small scale retail, commercial and community service uses. The TN -R zoning will allow for the development of a daycare center as well as other residential types (e.g. single-family, townhouse, duplex, multi -family, and vertically integrated residential uses). It will provide a transition in uses and zoning to existing and future medium density SFR properties to the east & south. The C -C zoning will allow small scale retail, office and service commercial uses as proposed, as well as a wide variety of commercial uses such as restaurants, drive-through establishments, and personal & professional services; employment uses such as offices, daycare center, industry information, and hotel/motel; and residential uses such as multi -family &vertically integrated residential. Overall, the zoning proposed by the applicant, as refined by staff, will allow for the development of a mix of residential, commercial and employment uses as required in MU -C and MU -R designated areas IF the site is developed in accord with the provisions in the DA as recommended by staff. To ensure a density compatible with the TMISAP for this site while still compromising on the overall land uses for this area, staff recommends a minimum of 380 units are provided on the overall site. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed and as recommended by staff, Staff recommends a DA is required as a provision of annexation that includes but is not limited to the following provisions: • The DA shall be modified prior to any development occurring on the site to include a more detailed conceptual development plan that is consistent with the MU -C &MU -R designations and includes a mix of uses from each major use category (commercial, residential, employment). • Future development is required to incorporate the design elements contained in the TMISAP for the MU -C & MU -R designated areas. • The property shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any building permits • A minimum of 380 residential dwelling units of varying types are required to be provided • A 10 -foot wide multi -use pathway is required along the north side of the Ten Mile Creek & to the property to the south per the Master Pathways Plan • Direct access to Franklin Rd. is prohibited except for the future collector street • Cross -access is required to the properties to the east & west Commission Recommendation: Approval per the staff report Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Mike Wardle ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: Mike Wardle, Applicant's Representative (response to the staff report Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. The Commission was conflicted in determining the number of residential units/density appropriate for this site and left it up to the Council to determine if the staff recommendation is appropriate or if a lesser number/density would be more appropriate (see condition #1.1.1d). Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: None Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. The number of residential units/density appropriate for this site. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Mike Wardle Since the Commission hearing, staff met with the applicant and discussed a modification to the zoning of the property which more accurately depicts the mid -mile collector and zoning established by the Ten Mile Center project to the south. Staff does not object to the applicant's proposed change. The applicant also requests the minimum number of residential units required to be constructed on the site be reduced from 380 to 218. Staff is not in favor of the proposed reduction. The applicant requests DA provision #1.1.1 i, which prohibits direct lot access via W. Franklin Road be modified as follows: "Direct lot access via W. Franklin Road, an arterial street, is prohibited per UDC 11-3A-3 unless approved by ACHD and the City in conjunction with a more detailed development plan and/or subdivision application." Notes: Item #7N: UDC Text Amendment 2015 and Meridian Design Manual Revamp (H-2015-0011) Application(s): ➢ UDC Text Amendment Summary of Request: The Planning Division has applied for a zoning text amendment application to 1) update certain sections of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and 2) revamp the City of Meridian Design Manual (DM). Part one of the subject application proposes modifications to the following UDC sections: definitions, residential dimensional standards, fencing, structure and site and multi -family design standards, common open space and site amenities requirements, specific use standards for drinking establishments, flex spaces and home occupations, timelines for signatures on development agreements, subdivision design and improvement standards and various other miscellaneous sections. Part two proposes revisions to the Meridian Design Manual. Since its inception in 2009, this document has seen very few modifications. The changes are proposed in effort to streamline the process and develop guidelines that are more expressive. The document name is also changing from the City of Meridian Design Manual, to the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual. All of the proposed changes to the UDC and Design Manual including the support documents are attached for your review in PDF format. Further, Staff has vetted a majority of the proposed changes with various design professionals and outside organizations with the hope of obtaining more transparency as the City embarks on changes to the development review process. In summary, Staff believes the proposed changes will make the implementation and use of the UDC and the Meridian Design Manual more understandable and enforceable. Commission Recommendation: Approval at the November 191h hearing Summary of Commission Public Hearing: a. Testimony: i. In favor: Planning Division ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Dave Yorgason iv. Written testimony: BCA v. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons vi. Other staff commenting on application: Caleb Hood b. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. The proposed dimensional standards of the residential districts. ii. Requiring less open space when lots average 10,000 square feet. iii. Requiring dedicated right-of-way to be landscaped along arterial streets even if it is within the transportation authorities five (5) year funded plan. c. Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. None d. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council i. None Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Recommendation: Approval Notes: Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 5A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Consent Agenda Approve Minutes of December 1, 2015 City Council PreCouncil Meeting MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS I Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM TITLE: Consent Agenda ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: Approve Minutes of December 1, 2015 City Council Meeting MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION I1 DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 5C PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: 2016 Dog Licensing Agreements Approval of 2016 Dog Licensing Agreements (9) with Intermountain Pet Hospital, Idaho Humane Society, Linder Pet Medical, Meridian Vet Clinic, Settler's Park Vet Hospital, Sunnyside Animal Hospital, The Pet Doctor, and Treasure Valley Vet Hospital MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS 2016 Dog Tags LOCATION SIGNED NUMBER OF CONTRACT BEGINNING # ENDING # - TAGS ISSUED COMMENTS / NOTES CITY HALL NA 2001 2100 100 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 IDAHO HUMANE SOCIETY YES 2300 2800 500 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 INTERMOUNTAIN PET YES 1301 1500 200 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 6320 Saguaro Hills new 2801 3000 200 ISSUED NOV 9, 2015 CINDER PET MEDICAL 2101 2200 100 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 REISSUED NOV 17, 2015 MERIDIAN POLICE DEPT NA 1 1000 1000 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 MERIDIAN VET YES 1501 1700 200 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 PET CARE YES 1701 1900 200 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 SETTLER'S PARK YES 1001 1200 200 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 SUNNYSIDE ANIMAL HOSPITAL YES 1901 2000 100 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 THE PET DOCTOR YES 2201 2300 100 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 TREASURE VALLEY VET YES 1201 1300 100 ISSUED NOV 1, 2015 C� flEf� ,IA DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ` h£ This DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT is made this day of , 20 ff by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," 3 3 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and (� Gi , hereinafter referred to as "LICENSING DESIGNEE," whose business address is A. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights and obligations of CITY and of LICENSING DESIGNEE with reference to LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses on CITY's behalf. By entering into this agreement, both parties seek to: 1) encourage and facilitate' Ie licensing of all dogs within the City of Meridian; and 2) implement the provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(H). B. Time of Performance: This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. C. Designation of authority: CITY hereby authorizes and empowers LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue dog licenses on behalf of CITY in accordance with all applicable provisions of Meridian City Code. D. Responsibilities of LICENSING DESIGNEE: 1. Issuance of dog licenses: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall issue dog licenses only after verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3, including, but not limited to: a. Verification that any dog to be licensed has a valid rabies vaccination in accordance with Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(D). b. Verification that the owner of any dog to be licensed is eligible for the license fee sought to be paid, i.e., whether dog to be licensed is neutered or spayed; whether dog owner/user is visually or hearing impaired or disabled; whether dog owner is training such dog as seeing eye, hearing ear, or guide dog; and/or whether replacement license tag will indeed replace validly issued, lost tag. I . Collection of appropriate license fee. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ® PAGE 1 OF 6 2. Official log: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep an official, monthly, written log of all dog licenses issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE on the form provided herewith entitled, "MONTHLY LOG — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE: [MONTH & YEAR]" (hereinafter "monthly log"). If such form is lost or rendered unusable for any reason whatsoever, LICENSING DESIGNEE must keep a written record including: the serial numbers of the dog license tags provided by CITY for issuance.by LICENSING DESIGNEE and shall also contain the following information as to each dog license issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE: a. date of issuance; b. dog license tag serial number; c. amount of license fee collected; d. amount of 'administrative fee collected; e. name, address, and telephone number of dog owner; f. description of dog to be licensed; g. verification of documentation demonstrating dog owner's compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3; and h. verification of eligibility of dog owner to pay license fee sought to be paid. 3. Administrative fee: CITY hereby authorizes LICENSING DESIGNEE to collect and keep an administrative fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of each dog license fee collected on CITY's behalf. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep a record of dog license fees collected and administrative fees retained and shall report same to CITY in its annual report. 4. Monthly submission to City Clerk: At the end of each month during the term of this Agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf; and b. A true and correct copy of the LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly log, completed in full. Such fees and log shall be submitted to the Meridian City Clerk no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the month following the month for which the fees were collected and the monthly log completed. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 2 OF 6 5. Annual submission to City Clerk: No later than January 15, 2016, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license tags provided by CITY to LICENSING DESIGNEE but unissued by LICENSING DESIGNEE; and b. An annual report, by completing in full the form provided herewith entitled, "ANNUAL REPORT — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE." 6. Remission of discrepancy: If, following the Meridian City Clerk's monthly and/or annual review and accounting of LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, the Meridian City Clerk notifies LICENSING DESIGNEE of a discrepancy in fees collected and data reported by LICENSING DESIGNEE in the log or quantity of unissued tags, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of such discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE's obligation to remit to CITY funds in an amount corresponding to the number and type of dog licenses issued and the number of unissued dog license tags returned to CITY shall not be excused for any reason, regardless of LICENSING DESIGNEE's assertion of loss, theft, misplacement, mistake, or mismanagement of fees, tags, and/or data. E. Responsibilities of CITY: 1. Provision of dog license tags: CITY shall provide to LICENSING DESIGNEE Q ant ) dog license tags with the following serial numbers: 2 `6L which dog license tags are to be issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE only upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3. 2. Monthly accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on behalf of CITY and the official monthly log kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an -accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's log. In the event of a discrepancy between the log, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. 3. Annual accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE, all official monthly 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 3 OF 6 logs kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, unissued dog license tags, and LICENSING DESIGNEE's annual report, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the _fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's logs. In the event of a discrepancy between the logs, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. F. Vicious dog licenses: This Agreement shall not authorize LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue vicious dog licenses on behalf of CITY. G. Independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither LICENSING DESIGNEE nor any officer, employee or agent of LICENSING DESIGNEE will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. H. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to CITY as follows: City Clerk, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, or to LICENSING DESIGNEE as follows: _ ng Desi"n er t3usiness Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. I. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate, subcontract,.or sell any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. K. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services set forth herein, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 4 OF 6 $.3`7©1s- L. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. M. Audits and Inspections: At any time during business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of LICENSING DESIGNEE'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. N. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. O. Changes: Proposed changes to any portion of this Agreement shall be submitted in writing. The party to whom the change is proposed shall have thirty (30) days to accept or reject the proposed change. Changes which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment signed by both parties. P. Termination: 1. Written notice: If, through any cause, LICENSING DESIGNEE, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the Meridian City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving LICENSING DESIGNEE at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice. LICENSING DESIGNEE may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice to CITY. 2. Remittance to CITY: In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or documents, data, and reports prepared by LICENSING DESIGNEE pursuant to Meridian City Code and/or under this Agreement, completed or incomplete, shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY all licensing fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf and all unissued dog license tags. Upon such remittance following termination, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting(s) as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not thereby be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by LICENSING DESIGNEE. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve LICENSING DESIGNEE of its liability to the CITY for damages. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 5 OF 6 Q. Construction and severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. R. Entire agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. S. Applicable law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. T. Approval required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by CITY. LICENSING DESIGNEE: KIM, J TAMr"e WEERD, MAYOR Attest: GW City of P�DIAh CI CL (� SEAL �.fT. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 6 OF 6 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT, This DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT is made this day of 20, by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," 3 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and aw 6 , hereinafter referred to as "LICENSING DESIGNEE," whose business address is �-jp W OW1 A06601) t 1,/ A. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rigfiiis an obligations of CITY and of LICENSING DESIGNEE with reference to LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses on CITY's behalf. By entering into this agreement, both parties seek to: 1) encourage and facilitate the licensing of all dogs within the City of Meridian; and 2) implement the provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(H). B. Time of Performance: This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. C. Designation of authority: CITY hereby authorizes and empowers LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue dog licenses on behalf of CITY in accordance with all applicable provisions of Meridian City Code. D. Responsibilities of LICENSING DESIGNEE: 1. Issuance of dog licenses: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall issue dog licenses only after verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3, including, but not limited to: a. Verification that any dog to be licensed has a valid rabies vaccination in accordance with Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(D). b. Verification that the owner of any dog to be licensed is eligible for the license fee sought to be paid, i.e., whether dog to be licensed is neutered or spayed; whether dog owner/user is visually or hearing impaired or disabled; whether dog owner is training such dog as seeing eye, hearing ear, or guide dog; and/or whether replacement license tag will indeed replace validly issued, lost tag. c. Collection of appropriate license fee. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ° PAGE 1 OF 6 2. Official log: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep an official, monthly; written log of all 'dog licenses issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE on the form provided herewith entitled, "MONTHLY LOG — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE: [MONTH & YEAR]" (hereinafter "monthly log"). If such form is lost or rendered unusable for any reason whatsoever, LICENSING DESIGNEE must keep a written record including: the serial numbers of the dog license tags provided by CITY for issuance. by LICENSING DESIGNEE and shall also contain the following information as to each dog license issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE: a. date of issuance; b. dog license tag serial number; c. amount of license fee collected; d. amount of administrative fee collected; e. name, address, and telephone number of dog owner; L description of dog to be licensed; g. verification of documentation demonstrating dog owner's compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3; and h. verification of eligibility of dog owner to pay license fee sought to be paid. 3. Administrative fee: CITY hereby authorizes LICENSING DESIGNEE to collect and keep an administrative fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of each dog license fee collected on CITY's behalf. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep a record of dog license fees collected and administrative fees retained and shall report same to CITY in its annual report. 4. Monthly submission to City Clerk: At the end of each month during the term of this Agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf; and b. A true and correct copy of the LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly log; completed in full. Such fees and log shall be submitted to the Meridian City Clerk no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the month following the month for which the fees were collected and the monthly log completed. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 2 OF 6 5. Annual submission to City Clerk: No later than January 15, 2016, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license tags provided by CITY to LICENSING DESIGNEE but unissued by LICENSING DESIGNEE; and b. An annual report, by completing in full the form provided herewith entitled, "ANNUAL REPORT — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE." 6. Remission of discrepancy: If, following the Meridian City Clerk's monthly and/or annual review and accounting of LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, the Meridian City Clerk notifies LICENSING DESIGNEE of a discrepancy in fees collected and data reported by LICENSING DESIGNEE in the log or quantity of unissued tags, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of such discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE's obligation to remit to CITY funds in an amount corresponding to the number and type of dog licenses issued and the number of unissued dog license tags returned to CITY shall not be excused for any reason, regardless of LICENSING DESIGNEE's assertion of loss, theft, misplacement, mistake, or mismanagement of fees, tags, and/or data. E. Responsibilities of CITY: 1. Provision of dog license tags: CITY shall provide to LICENSING DESIGNEE Qu tity do license tags wrta share to be issued b LICENSING DESIGNEE only upon �., g g .., L which dog license tags Y n LICENSING DESIGNEE's verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3. 2. Monthly accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE'S monthly remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on behalf of CITY and the official monthly log kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's log. In the event of a discrepancy between the log, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. 3. Annual accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE, all official monthly 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 3 OF 6 logs kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, unissued dog license tags, and LICENSING DESIGNEE's annual report, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's logs. In the event of a discrepancy between the logs, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. F. Vicious dog licenses: This Agreement shall not authorize LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue vicious dog licenses on behalf of CITY. G. Independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither LICENSING DESIGNEE nor any officer, employee or agent of LICENSING DESIGNEE will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. H. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to CITY as follows: City Clerk, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, or to LICENSING DESIGNEE as follows: _ T'.ia gun 61,y(lkad (fid - fWdJaa JC/ Lice ing Designee Business Name and Address 9�slflyz Either parry may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. I. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate, subcontract,.or sell any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. K. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services set forth herein, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ° PAGE 4 OF 6 L. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be famished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. M. Audits and Inspections: At any time during business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of LICENSING DESIGNEE'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. N. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. ®. Changes: Proposed changes to any portion of this Agreement shall be submitted in writing. The party to whom the change is proposed shall have thirty (30) days to accept or reject the proposed change. Changes which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment signed by both parties. P. Termination: 1. Written notice: If, through any cause, LICENSING DESIGNEE, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the Meridian City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving LICENSING DESIGNEE at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice. LICENSING DESIGNEE may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice to CITY. 2. Remittance to CITY: In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or documents, data, and reports prepared by LICENSING DESIGNEE pursuant to Meridian City Code and/or under this Agreement, completed or incomplete, shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY all licensing fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf and all unissued dog license tags. Upon such remittance following termination, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting(s) as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not thereby be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by LICENSING DESIGNEE. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve LICENSING DESIGNEE of its liability to the CITY for damages. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 5 OF 6 Q. Construction and severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. R. Entire agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. S. Applicable law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. T. Approval required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by CITY. LICENSING DESIGNEE: rm n a x6n T4 Wc6P��� Name ofBusiness / A; Desi ee's Signatuure BY: /- M M ('L l V&Gi;�r Print Name CITY OF MERIDIAN: BY: - TAMM d ERD, MAYOR ore r� Attest: $C, City of E TDIAN*4- CITY CLE t'�j("°A"° l'A L . `v v iR(�SUO��P 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 6 OF 6 OME DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT r-�/This DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT is made this _ day of 20L5, , by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CTY," 33 EastBroad-wayAvenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and ' lieremalter referred to ,as "LICENSING DESIGNEE," whose business address is A. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights and obligations of CITY and of LICENSING DESIGNEE with reference to LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses on CITY's behalf. By entering into this agreement, both parties seek to: 1) encourage and facilitate the licensing of all dogs within the City of Meridian; and 2) implement the provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(H). B. Time of Performance: This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. C. Designation of authority: CITY hereby authorizes and empowers LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue dog licenses on behalf of.CITY in accordance with all applicable provisions of Meridian City Code. D. Responsibilities of LICENSING DESIGNEE: 1. Issuance of dog licenses: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall issue dog licenses only after verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3, including, but not limited to: a. Verification that any dog to be licensed has a valid rabies vaccination in accordance with Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(D). b. Verification that the owner of any dog to be licensed is eligible for the license fee sought to be paid, i. e., whether dog to be licensed is neutered or spayed; whether dog owner/user is visually or hearing impaired or disabled; whether dog owner is training such dog as seeing eye, hearing ear, or guide dog; and/or whether replacement license tag will indeed replace validly issued, lost tag. c. Collection of appropriate license fee. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE I OF 6 2. Official log: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep an official, monthly, written log of all dog licenses issued by' LICENSING DESIGNEE on the form provided herewith entitled, "MONTHLY LOG — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE: [MONTH & YEAR]" (hereinafter "monthly log"). If such form is lost or rendered unusable for any reason whatsoever, LICENSING DESIGNEE must keep a written record including: the serial numbers of the dog license tags provided by CITY"for issuance by LICENSING DESIGNEE and shall also contain the following information as to each dog license issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE: a. date of issuance; b. dog license tag serial number; c. amount of license fee collected; d. amount of administrative fee collected; e. name, address, and telephone number of dog owner; f. description of dog to be licensed; g. verification of documentation demonstrating dog owner's compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3; and h. verification of eligibility of dog owner to pay license fee sought to be paid. 3. Administrative fee: CITY hereby authorizes LICENSING DESIGNEE to collect and keep an administrative fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of each dog license fee collected on CITY's behalf. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep a record of dog license fees collected and administrative fees retained and shall report same to CITY in its annual report. 4. Monthly submission to City Clerk: At the end of each month during the term of this Agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf, and b. A true and correct copy of the LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly log, completed in full. Such fees and log shall be submitted to the Meridian City Clerk no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the month following the month for which the fees were collected and the monthly log completed. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 2 OF 6 5. Annual submission to City Clerk: No later than January 15, 2016, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license tags provided by CITY to LICENSING DESIGNEE but unissued by LICENSING DESIGNEE; and b. An annual report, by completing in full the form provided herewith entitled, "ANNUAL REPORT — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE." 6. Remission of discrepancy: If, following the Meridian City Clerk's monthly and/or annual review and accounting of LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, the Meridian City Clerk notifies LICENSING DESIGNEE of a discrepancy in fees collected and data reported by LICENSING DESIGNEE in the log or quantity of unissued tags, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of such discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE's obligation to remit to CITY funds in an amount corresponding to the number and type of dog licenses issued and the number of unissued dog license tags returned to CITY shall not be excused for any reason, regardless of LICENSING DESIGNEE's assertion of loss, theft, misplacement, mistake, or mismanagement of fees, tags, and/or data. E. Responsibilities of CITY: 1. Provision of dog license tags: CITY shall provide to LICENSING DESIGNEE 1 Quantity "-7 dog license tags with the following serial numbers: V S' which dog license tags are to be issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE only upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3. 2. Monthly accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on behalf of CITY and the official monthly log kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's log. In the event of a discrepancy between the log, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. 3. Annual accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE, all official monthly 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT m PAGE 3 OF 6 logs kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, unissued dog license tags, and LICENSING DESIGNEE's annual report, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's logs. In the event of a discrepancy between the logs, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. F. Vicious dog licenses: This Agreement shall not authorize LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue vicious dog licenses on behalf of CITY. G. Independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither LICENSING DESIGNEE nor any officer, employee or agent of LICENSING DESIGNEE will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. H. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to CITY as follows: City Clerk, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, or to LICENSING DESIGNEE as follows: ng Designee ness Name ress C, 10. Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. I. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate, subcontract, or sell any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. K. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services set forth herein, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 4 OF 6 L. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. M. Audits and Inspections: At any time during business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of LICENSING DESIGNEE'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. N. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. 0. Changes: Proposed changes to any portion of this Agreement shall be submitted in writing. The party to whom the change is proposed shall have thirty (30) days to accept or reject the proposed change. Changes which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment signed by both parties. P. Termination: 1. Written notice: If, through any cause, LICENSING DESIGNEE, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the Meridian City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving LICENSING DESIGNEE at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice. LICENSING DESIGNEE may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice to CITY. 2. Remittance to CITY: In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or documents, data, and reports prepared by LICENSING DESIGNEE pursuant to Meridian City Code and/or under this Agreement, completed or incomplete, shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY all licensing fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf and all unissued dog license tags. Upon such remittance following termination, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting(s) as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not thereby be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by LICENSING DESIGNEE. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve LICENSING DESIGNEE of its liability to the CITY for damages. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 5 OF 6 Q. Construction and severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. R. Entire agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. S. Applicable law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. T. Approval °required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by CITY. LICENSING DESIGNEE: o'"t p �G2 Name of Business D ignee's Slgfffture BY: , Pri t Name CITY O TAMMY /)WEERD, MAYOR -- �V/ ovj13ennu Attest: ' City of IDIAN& CIT CLE T "°'�" ° 0 0- FAL the TItI+SJ�� 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 6 OF 6 C� fIEN,,LIA�-M DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT { his DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT is made this day of 20L�, by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referredo'°s "CITY," 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, andy R , hereina er referred to as "LICENSING DESIGNEE," whose business address is A. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights and obligations of CITY and of LICENSING DESIGNEE with reference to LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses on CITY's behalf. By entering into this agreement, both parties seek to: 1) encourage and facilitate the licensing of all dogs within the City of Meridian; and 2) implement the provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(H). B. Time of Performance: This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. C. Designation of authority: CITY hereby authorizes and empowers LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue dog licenses on behalf of CITY in accordance with all applicable provisions of Meridian City Code. D. Responsibilities of LICENSING DESIGNEE: 1. Issuance of dog licenses: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall issue dog licenses only after verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3, including, but not limited to: a. Verification that any dog to be licensed has a valid rabies vaccination in accordance with Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(D). b. Verification that the owner of any dog to be licensed is eligible for the license fee sought to be paid, i. e., whether dog to be licensed is neutered or spayed; whether dog owner/user is visually or hearing impaired or disabled; whether dog owner is training such dog as seeing eye, hearing ear, or guide dog; and/or whether replacement license tag will indeed replace validly issued, lost tag. c. Collection of appropriate license fee. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE I OF 6 2. Official log: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep an official, monthly, written log of all dog licenses issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE on the form provided herewith entitled, "MONTHLY LOG — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE: [MONTH & YEAR]" (hereinafter "monthly log"). If such form is lost or rendered unusable for any reason whatsoever, LICENSING DESIGNEE must keep a written record including: the serial numbers of the dog license tags provided by CITY for issuance.by LICENSING DESIGNEE and shall- also contain the following information as to each dog license issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE: a. date of issuance; b. dog license tag serial number; c. amount of license fee collected; d. amount of 'administrative fee collected; e. name, address, and telephone number of dog owner; L description of dog to be licensed; g. verification of documentation demonstrating dog owner's compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3; and h. verification of eligibility of dog owner to pay license fee sought to be paid. 3. Administrative fee: CITY hereby authorizes LICENSING DESIGNEE to collect and keep an administrative fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of each dog license fee collected on CITY's behalf. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep a record of dog license fees collected and administrative fees retained and shall report same to CITY in its annual report. 4. Monthly submission to City Clerk: At the end of each month during the term of this Agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf; and b. A true and correct copy of the LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly log; completed in full. Such fees and log shall be submitted to the Meridian City Clerk no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the month following the month for which the fees were collected and the monthly log completed. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 2 OF 6 5. Annual submission to City Clerk: No later than January 15, 2016, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license tags provided by CITY to LICENSING DESIGNEE but unissued by LICENSING DESIGNEE; and b. An annual report, by completing in full the form provided herewith entitled, "ANNUAL REPORT — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE." 6. Remission of discrepancy: If, following the Meridian City Clerk's monthly and/or annual review and accounting of LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, the Meridian City Clerk notifies LICENSING DESIGNEE of a discrepancy in fees collected and data reported by LICENSING DESIGNEE in the log or quantity of unissued tags, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of such discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE's obligation to remit to CITY funds in an amount corresponding to the number and type of dog licenses issued and the number of unissued dog license tags returned to CITY shall not be excused for any reason, regardless of LICENSING DESIGNEE's assertion of loss, theft, misplacement, mistake, or mismanagement of fees, tags, and/or data. E. Responsibilities of CITY: 1. Provision of dog license tags: CITY shall provide to LICENSING DESIGNEE Quantity dog license tags with the following serial numbers: )� �I_:" r , which dog license tags are to be issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE only upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3. 2. Monthly accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on behalf of CITY and the official monthly log kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's log. In the event of a discrepancy between the log, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. 3. Annual accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE, all official monthly 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 3 OF 6 logs kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, unissued dog license tags, and LICENSING DESIGNEE'S annual report, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's logs. In the event of a discrepancy between the logs, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. F. Vicious dog licenses: This Agreement shall not authorize LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue vicious dog licenses on behalf of CITY. G. Independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither LICENSING DESIGNEE nor any officer, employee or agent of LICENSING DESIGNEE will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. H. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to CITY as follows: City Clerk, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, or to LICENSING DESIGNEE as follows: _ Either party may change its address for the purpose of -this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. I. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing parry shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate, subcontract,.or sell any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. K. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services set forth herein, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT 0 PAGE 4 OF 6 L. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY -may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. M. Audits and Inspections: At any time during business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of LICENSING DESIGNEE'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. N. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. O. Changes: Proposed changes to any portion of this Agreement shall be submitted in writing. The party to whom the change is proposed shall have thirty (30) days to accept or reject the proposed change. Changes which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment signed by both parties. P. Termination: 1. Written notice: If, through any cause, LICENSING DESIGNEE, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the Meridian City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving LICENSING DESIGNEE at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice. LICENSING DESIGNEE may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice to CITY. 2. Remittance to CITY: In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or documents, data, and reports prepared by LICENSING DESIGNEE pursuant to Meridian City Code and/or under this Agreement, completed or incomplete, shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY all licensing fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf and all unissued dog license tags. Upon such remittance following termination, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting(s) as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not thereby be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by LICENSING DESIGNEE. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve LICENSING DESIGNEE of its liability to the CITY for damages. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREENIENT 0 PAGE 5 OF 6 Q. Construction and severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. R. Entire agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. S. Applicable law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. T. Approval required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by CITY. LICENSING DESIGNEE: QA I Name of Bu jn D?aigneeignature BY: Print Name CITY OF TAMMY MAYOR q,,,,,�tan Attest: ��� City of E IDIAN CIT ERKU IDAHO SEAL ° rel TRIO'S 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 6 OF 6 C� fIEN DIAT DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT a .�This DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT is made this � day of , 20 G, by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and -'lr enc- hereinafter referred to as "LICENSING DESIGNEE," whose business address is &l / rA,,9jeYg0 A. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights and obligations of CITY and of LICENSING DESIGNEE with reference to LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses on CITY's behalf. By entering into this agreement, both parties seek to: 1) encourage and facilitate the licensing of all dogs within the City of Meridian; and 2) implement the provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(H). B. Time of Performance: This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. C. Designation of authority: CITY hereby authorizes and empowers LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue dog licenses on behalf of CITY in accordance with all applicable provisions of Meridian City Code. D. Responsibilities of LICENSING DESIGNEE: 1. Issuance of dog licenses: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall issue dog licenses only after verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3, including, but not limited to: a. Verification that any dog to be licensed has a valid rabies vaccination in accordance with Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(D). b. Verification that the owner of any dog to be licensed is eligible for the license fee sought to be paid, i. e., whether dog to be licensed is neutered or spayed; whether dog owner/user is visually or hearing impaired or disabled; whether dog owner is training such dog as seeing eye, hearing ear, or guide dog; and/or whether replacement license tag will indeed replace validly issued, lost tag. c. Collection of appropriate license fee. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 1 OF 6 2. Official log: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep an official, monthly, written log of all dog licenses issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE on the form provided herewith entitled, "MONTHLY LOG — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE: [MONTH & YEAR]" (hereinafter "monthly log"). If such form is lost or rendered unusable for any reason whatsoever, LICENSING DESIGNEE must keep a written record including: the serial numbers of the dog license tags provided by CITY for issuance -by LICENSING DESIGNEE and shall also contain the following information as to each dog license issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE: a. date of issuance; b. dog license tag serial number; c. amount of license fee collected; d. amount of administrative fee collected; e. name, address, and telephone number of dog owner; f. description of dog to be licensed; g. verification of documentation demonstrating dog owner's compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3; and h. verification of eligibility of dog owner to pay license fee sought to be paid. 3. Administrative fee: CITY hereby authorizes LICENSING DESIGNEE to collect and keep an administrative fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of each dog license fee collected on CITY's behalf. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep a record of dog license fees collected and administrative fees retained and shall report same to CITY in its annual report. 4. Monthly submission to City Clerk: At the end of each month during the term of this Agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf; and b. A true and correct copy of the LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly log; completed in full. Such fees and log shall be submitted to the Meridian City Clerk no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the month following the month for which the fees were collected and the monthly log completed. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 2 OF 6 5. Annual submission to City Clerk: No later than January 15, 2016, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license tags provided by CITY to LICENSING DESIGNEE but unissued by LICENSING DESIGNEE; and b. An annual report, by completing in full the form provided herewith entitled, "ANNUAL REPORT — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE." 6. Remission of discrepancy: If, following the Meridian City Clerk's monthly and/or annual review and accounting of LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, the Meridian City Clerk notifies LICENSING DESIGNEE of a discrepancy in fees collected and data reported by LICENSING DESIGNEE in the log or quantity of unissued tags, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of such discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE's obligation to remit to CITY funds in an amount corresponding to the number and type of dog licenses issued and the number of unissued dog license tags returned to CITY shall not be excused for any reason, regardless of LICENSING DESIGNEE's assertion of loss, theft, misplacement, mistake, or mismanagement of fees, tags, and/or data. E. Responsibilities of CITY: 171, 1. Provision of dog license tags: CITY shall provide to LICENSING DESIGNEE•" Quantity dog license tags with the following serial numbers: > which dog license tags are to be issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE only upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3. 2. Monthly accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on behalf of CITY and the official monthly log kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's log. In the event of a discrepancy between the log, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. 3. Annual accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE, all official monthly 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 3 OF 6 logs kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, unissued dog license tags, and LICENSING DESIGNEE's annual report, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's logs. In the event of a discrepancy between the logs, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. F. Vicious dog licenses: This Agreement shall not authorize LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue vicious dog licenses on behalf of CITY. G. Independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither LICENSING DESIGNEE nor any officer, employee or agent of LICENSING DESIGNEE will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. H. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to CITY as follows: City Clerk, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, or to LICENSING DESIGNEE as follows: _ Licensing Designee Business Name and Address Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. I. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate, subcontract,.or sell any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. K. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services set forth herein, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT H PAGE 4 OF 6 L. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. M. Audits and Inspections: At any time during business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of LICENSING DESIGNEE'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. N. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. O. Changes: Proposed changes to any portion of this Agreement shall be submitted in writing. The party to whom the change is proposed shall have thirty (30) days to accept or reject the proposed change. Changes which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment signed by both parties. P. Termination: 1. Written notice: If, through any cause, LICENSING DESIGNEE, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the Meridian City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving LICENSING DESIGNEE at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice. LICENSING DESIGNEE may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice to CITY. 2. Remittance to CITY: In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or docinnents, data, and reports prepared by LICENSING DESIGNEE pursuant to Meridian City Code and/or under this Agreement, completed or incomplete, shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY all licensing fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf and all unissued dog license tags. Upon such remittance following termination, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting(s) as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not thereby be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by LICENSING DESIGNEE. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve LICENSING DESIGNEE of its liability to the CITY for damages. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREENI NT ■ PAGE 5 OF 6 Q. Construction and severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. R. Entire agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. S. Applicable law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. T. Approval required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by CITY. LICENSING DESIGNEE: ?it- 1�?4 2G �� t Ay lZ— Name of Business m P DXzal, Designee'V'Signature BY: lc��,v v y J,��u- Print Name CITY OF MERIDIAN: BY: TAMMY d HERD, MAYOR o����D nucusl. Attest: t City Of CITY CLE IDA', G A" 4 s R T1'e("y2� v •�(' r p 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEN NT m PAGE 6 OF 6 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT Abjhis DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT is made this qday of , 20t, by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. and k r+ 1, LX -5 9A"— A► ,Oe � 1.hereinafter referred to as "LICENSING DESIGNEE," whose business address is A. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights and obligations of CITY and of LICENSING DESIGNEE with reference to LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses on CITY's behalf. By entering into this agreement, both parties seek to: 1) encourage and facilitate the licensing of all dogs within the City of Meridian; and 2) implement the provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(H). B. Time of Performance: This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. C. Designation of authority: CITY hereby authorizes and empowers LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue dog licenses on behalf of CITY in accordance with all applicable provisions of Meridian City Code. D. Responsibilities of LICENSING DESIGNEE: 1. Issuance of dog licenses: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall issue dog licenses only after verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3, including, but not limited to: a. Verification that any dog to be licensed has a valid rabies vaccination in accordance with Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(D). b. Verification that the owner of any dog to be licensed is eligible for the license fee sought to be paid, i.e., whether dog to be licensed is neutered or spayed; whether dog owner/user is visually or hearing impaired or disabled; whether dog owner is training such dog as seeing eye, hearing ear, or guide dog; and/or whether replacement license tag will indeed replace validly issued, lost tag. c. Collection of appropriate license fee. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 1 OF 6 2. Official log: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep an official, monthly; written log of all ` 'dog licenses issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE on the form provided herewith entitled, "MONTHLY LOG — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE: [MONTH & YEAR]" (hereinafter "monthly log"). If such form is lost or rendered unusable for any reason whatsoever, LICENSING DESIGNEE must keep a written record including: the serial numbers of the dog license tags provided by CITY for issuance.by LICENSING DESIGNEE and shall also contain the following information as to each dog license issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE: a. date of issuance; b. dog license tag serial number; c. amount of license fee collected; d. amount of administrative fee collected; e. name, address, and telephone number of dog owner; f. description of dog to be licensed; g. verification of documentation demonstrating dog owner's compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3; and h. verification of eligibility of dog owner to pay license fee sought to be paid. 3. Administrative fee: CITY hereby authorizes LICENSING DESIGNEE to collect and keep an administrative fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of each dog license fee collected on CITY's behalf. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep a record of dog license fees collected and administrative fees retained and shall report same to CITY in its annual report. d. Monthly submission to City Clerk: At the end of each month during the term of this Agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf; and b. A true and correct copy of the LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly log; completed in full. Such fees and log shall be submitted to the Meridian City Clerk no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the month following the month for which the fees were collected and the monthly log completed. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 2 OF 6 5. Annual submission to City Clerk: No later than January 15, 2016, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license tags provided by CITY to LICENSING DESIGNEE but unissued by LICENSING DESIGNEE; and b. An annual report, by completing in full the form provided herewith entitled, "ANNUAL REPORT — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE." 6. Remission of discrepancy: If, following the Meridian City Clerk's monthly and/or annual review and accounting of LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, the Meridian City Clerk notifies LICENSING DESIGNEE of a discrepancy in fees collected and data reported by LICENSING DESIGNEE in the log or quantity of unissued tags, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of such discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE's obligation to remit to CITY funds in an amount corresponding to the number and type of dog licenses issued and the number of unissued dog license tags returned to CITY shall not be excused for any reason, regardless of LICENSING DESIGNEE's assertion of loss, theft, misplacement, mistake, or mismanagement of fees, tags, and/or data. E. Responsibilities of CITY: 1. Provision of dog license tags: CITY shall provide to LICENSING DESIGNEE ' - Quantity dog license tags with the following serial numbers: r which dog license tags are to be issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE only upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3. 2. Monthly accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on behalf of CITY and the official monthly log kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's log. In the event of a discrepancy between the log, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. 3. Annual accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE, all official monthly 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 3 OF 6 logs kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, unissued dog license tags, and LICENSING DESIGNEE's annual report, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's logs. In the event of a discrepancy between the logs, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. F. Vicious dog licenses: This Agreement shall not authorize LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue vicious dog licenses on behalf of CITY. G. Independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither LICENSING DESIGNEE nor any officer, employee or agent of LICENSING DESIGNEE will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. H. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to CITY as follows: City Clerk, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, or to LICENSING DESIGNEE as follows: _ ��P7- z- 3 z2-0 M, A " Licensing Designee Business Name ana Haaruss y-s�-yVri �:Ylk yl Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. I. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate, subcontract,.or sell any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. K. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services set forth herein, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT 9 PAGE 4 OF 6 L. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. M. Audits and Inspections: At any time during business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of LICENSING DESIGNEE'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. N. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. O. Changes: Proposed changes to any portion of this Agreement shall be submitted in writing. The party to whom the change is proposed shall have thirty (3 0) days to accept or reject the proposed change. Changes which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment signed by both parties. P. Termination: 1. Written notice: If, through any cause, LICENSING DESIGNEE, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the Meridian City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving LICENSING DESIGNEE at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice. LICENSING DESIGNEE may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice to CITY. 2. Remittance to CITY: In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or documents, data, and reports prepared by LICENSING DESIGNEE pursuant to Meridian City Code and/or under this Agreement, completed or incomplete, shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY all licensing fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf and all unissued dog license tags. Upon such remittance following termination, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting(s) as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not thereby be relieved of liability to the, CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by LICENSING DESIGNEE. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve LICENSING DESIGNEE of its liability to the CITY for damages. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 5 OF 6 Q. Construction and severability:- If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. R. Entire agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. S. Applicable law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. T. Approval required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by CITY. LICENSING DESIGNEE: �t>i'g;5 "T- s Name of Business Designee' i a re �p BY: :70 o � '.o;> v" `J x-15 Print Name CITY OF MERIDIAN: :• TAMMY d ERD, MAYOR -- 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT n PAGE 6 OF 6 f1ENDI�AN�=- DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT `his DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT is made this day of 20 IS, by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and 11tor"ki sibAn irah 14, ,hereinafter referred to as "LICENSING DESIGNEE," whose business address is A. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights and obligations of CITY and of LICENSING DESIGNEE with reference to LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses on CITY's behalf. By entering into this agreement, both parties seek to: 1) encourage and facilitate the licensing of all dogs within the City of Meridian; and 2) implement the provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(H). B. Time of Performance: This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. C. Designation of authority: CITY hereby authorizes and empowers LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue dog licenses on behalf of CITY in accordance with all applicable provisions of Meridian City Code. D. Responsibilities of LICENSING DESIGNEE: 1. Issuance of dog licenses: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall issue dog licenses only after verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3, including, but not limited to: a. Verification that any dog to be licensed has a valid rabies vaccination in accordance with Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(D). b. Verification that the owner of any dog to be licensed is eligible for the license fee sought to be paid, i.e., whether dog to be licensed is neutered or spayed; whether dog owner/user is visually or hearing impaired or disabled; whether dog owner is training such dog as seeing eye, hearing ear, or guide dog; and/or whether replacement license tag will indeed replace validly issued, lost tag. c. Collection of appropriate license fee. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 1'OF 6 2. Official log: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep an official, monthly, written log of all - "dog licenses issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE on the form provided herewith entitled, "MONTHLY LOG — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE: [MONTH & YEAR]" (hereinafter "monthly log"). If such form is lost or rendered unusable for any reason whatsoever, LICENSING DESIGNEE must keep a written record including: the serial numbers of the dog license tags provided by CITY for issuance.by LICENSING DESIGNEE and shall- also contain the following information as to each dog license issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE: a. date of issuance; b. dog license tag serial number; c. amount of license fee collected; d. amount of 'administrative fee collected; e. name, address, and telephone number of dog owner; f. description of dog to be licensed; g. verification of documentation demonstrating dog owner's compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3; and h. verification of eligibility of dog owner to pay license fee sought to be paid. 3. Administrative fee: CITY hereby authorizes LICENSING DESIGNEE to collect and keep an administrative fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of each dog license fee collected on CITY's behalf. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep a record of dog license fees collected and administrative fees retained and shall report same to CITY in its annual report. 4. Monthly submission to City Clerk: At the end of each month during the term of this Agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf; and b. A true and correct copy of the LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly log; completed in full. Such fees and log shall be submitted to the Meridian City Clerk no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the month following the month for which the fees were collected and the monthly log completed. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ® PAGE 2 OF 6 5. Annual submission to City Clerk: No later than January 15, 2016, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license tags provided by CITY to LICENSING DESIGNEE but unissued by LICENSING DESIGNEE; and b. An annual report, by completing in full the form provided herewith entitled, "ANNUAL REPORT — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE." 6. Remission of discrepancy: If, following the Meridian City Clerk's monthly and/or annual review and accounting of LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, the Meridian City Clerk notifies LICENSING DESIGNEE of a discrepancy in fees collected and data reported by LICENSING DESIGNEE in the log or quantity of unissued tags, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of such discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE's obligation to remit to CITY funds in an amount corresponding to the number and type of dog licenses issued and the number of unissued dog license tags returned to CITY shall not be excused for any reason, regardless of LICENSING DESIGNEE's assertion of loss, theft, misplacement, mistake, or mismanagement of fees, tags, and/or data. E. Responsibilities of CITY: 1. Provision of dog license tags: CITY shall provide to LICENSING DESIGNEE Quantity dog license tags with the following serial numbers:`` which dog license tags are to be issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE only upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3. 2. Monthly accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE'S monthly remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on behalf of CITY and the official monthly log kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's log. In the event of a discrepancy between the log, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. 3. Annual accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE, all official monthly 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 3 OF 6 logs kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, unissued dog license tags, and LICENSING DESIGNEE's annual_ report, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's logs. In the event of a discrepancy between the logs, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. F. Vicious dog licenses: This Agreement shall not authorize LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue vicious dog licenses on behalf of CITY. G. Independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither LICENSING DESIGNEE nor any officer, employee or agent of LICENSING DESIGNEE will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. H. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to CITY as follows: City Clerk, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, or to LICENSING DESIGNEE as follows: _ ng Degignee Business ress Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. I. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate, subcontract,.or sell any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. K. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services set forth herein, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT o PAGE 4 OF 6 L. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. M. Audits and Inspections: At any time during business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of LICENSING DESIGNEE'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. N. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. O. Changes: Proposed changes to any portion of this Agreement shall be submitted in writing. The party to whom the change is proposed shall have thirty (3 0) days to accept or reject the proposed change. Changes which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment signed by both parties. P. Termination: 1. Written notice: If, through any cause, LICENSING DESIGNEE, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the Meridian City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving LICENSING DESIGNEE at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice. LICENSING DESIGNEE may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice to CITY. 2. Remittance to CITY: In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or documents, data, and reports prepared by LICENSING DESIGNEE pursuant to Meridian City Code and/or under this Agreement, completed or incomplete, shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY all licensing fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf and all unissued dog license tags. Upon such remittance following termination, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting(s) as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not thereby be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by LICENSING DESIGNEE. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve LICENSING DESIGNEE of its liability to the CITY for damages. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 5 OF 6 Q. Construction and severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. R. Entire agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. S. Applicable law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. T. Approval required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by CITY. LICENSING DESIGNEE: Name of Busnitss F BY: f arc,/le l /VaA, dei' Print Name CITY OF MERIDIAN: BY: TAMMY creWEERD, MAYOR Attest: CITY `$GOCSORpTED AU�.�SlrX City of �21ER,IDIfll° A— 4 \DANO SERI, w ��T Pkv C,Q o(.rhe TRF A560�'y .. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 6 OF 6 E IDIAN DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT i v`b, -This DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT is made this day of e,r , 20)5 by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and :2!�;i, 1 C4 arr O r , hereinafter referred to as "LICENSING DESIGNEE," whose business address is 09by W, 4rfeoe 51. %,)ise . `33701 A. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights and obligations of CITY and of LICENSING DESIGNEE with reference to LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses on CITY's behalf. By entering into this agreement, both parties seek to: 1) encourage and facilitate the licensing of all dogs within the City of Meridian; and 2) implement the provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(H). B. Time of Performance: This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. C. Designation of authority: CITY hereby authorizes and empowers LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue dog licenses on behalf of CITY in accordance with all applicable provisions of Meridian City Code. D. Responsibilities of LICENSING DESIGNEE: 1. Issuance of dog licenses: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall issue dog licenses only after verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3, including, but not limited to: a. Verification that any dog to be licensed has a valid rabies vaccination in accordance with Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(D). b. Verification that the owner of any dog to be licensed is eligible for the license fee sought to be paid, i. e., whether dog to be licensed is neutered or spayed; whether dog owner/user is visually or hearing impaired or disabled; whether dog owner is training such dog as seeing eye, hearing ear, or guide dog; and/or whether replacement license tag will indeed replace validly issued, lost tag. c. Collection of appropriate license fee. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 1 OF 6 2. Official log: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep an official, monthly, written log of all 'dog licenses issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE on the form provided herewith entitled, "MONTHLY LOG — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE: [MONTH & YEAR]" (hereinafter "monthly log"). If such form is lost or rendered unusable for any reason whatsoever, LICENSING DESIGNEE must keep a written record including: the serial numbers of the dog license tags provided by CITY for issuance. by LICENSING DESIGNEE and shall also contain the following information as to each dog license issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE: a. date of issuance; b. dog license tag serial number; GU?) c. amount of license fee collected; e� &C d. amount of administrative fee collected; re?or e. name, address, and telephone number of dog owner; Cop i f. description of dog to be licensed; Cc�1�l g. verification of documentation demonstrating dog owner's compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3; and C©P j h. verification of eligibility of dog owner to pay license fee sought to be paid. 3. Administrative fee: CITY hereby authorizes LICENSING DESIGNEE to collect and keep an administrative fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of each dog license fee collected on CITY's behalf. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep a record of dog license fees collected and administrative fees retained and shall report same to CITY in its annual report. 4. Monthly submission to City Clerk: At the end of each month during the term of this Agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf; and b. A true and correct copy of the LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly log; completed in full. Such fees and log shall be submitted to the Meridian City Clerk no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the month following the month for which the fees were collected and the monthly log completed. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 2 OF 6 5. Annual submission to City Clerk: No later than January 15, 2016, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license tags provided by CITY to LICENSING DESIGNEE but unissued by LICENSING DESIGNEE; and b. An annual report, by completing in full the form provided herewith entitled, "ANNUAL REPORT — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE." 6. Remission of discrepancy: If, following the Meridian City Clerk's monthly and/or annual review and accounting of LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, the Meridian City Clerk notifies LICENSING DESIGNEE of a discrepancy in fees collected and data reported by LICENSING DESIGNEE in the log or quantity of unissued tags, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of such discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE's obligation to remit to CITY funds in an amount corresponding to the number and type of dog licenses issued and the number of unissued dog license tags returned to CITY shall not be excused for any reason, regardless of LICENSING DESIGNEE's assertion of loss, theft, misplacement, mistake, or mismanagement of fees, tags, and/or data: E. Responsibilities of CITY: 1. Provision of dog license tags: CITY shall provide to LICENSING DESIGNEE E Quantity dog license tags with the following serial numbers: tr - which dog license tags are to be issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE only upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3. 2. Monthly accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on behalf of CITY and the official monthly log kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee' -s log. In the event of a discrepancy between the log, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. 3. Annual accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE, all official monthly 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 3 OF 6 logs kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, unissued dog license tags, and LICENSING DESIGNEE's annual report, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's logs. In the event of a discrepancy between the logs, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. F. Vicious dog licenses: This Agreement shall not authorize LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue vicious dog licenses on behalf of CITY. G. Independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither LICENSING DESIGNEE nor any officer, employee or agent of LICENSING DESIGNEE will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. H. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to CITY as follows: City Clerk, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, or to LICENSING DESIGNEE as follows: _ L i t Oro,/ 0 Licensing Designee Business Name and Address Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. I. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate, subcontract,.or sell any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. K. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services set forth herein, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 4 OF 6 L. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be famished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. M. Audits and Inspections: At any time during business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of LICENSING DESIGNEE'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. N. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. O. Changes: Proposed changes to any portion of this Agreement shall be submitted in writing. The party to whom the change is proposed shall have thirty (3 0) days to accept or reject the proposed change. Changes which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment signed by both parties. P. Termination: 1. Written notice: If, through any cause, LICENSING DESIGNEE, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the Meridian City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving LICENSING DESIGNEE at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice. LICENSING DESIGNEE may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice to CITY. 2. Remittance to CITY: In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or documents, data, and reports prepared by LICENSING DESIGNEE pursuant to Meridian City Code and/or under this Agreement, completed or incomplete, shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY all licensing fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf and all unissued dog license tags. Upon such remittance following termination, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting(s) as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not thereby be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by LICENSING DESIGNEE. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve LICENSING DESIGNEE of its liability to the CITY for damages. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 5 OF 6 Q. Construction and severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. R. Entire agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. S. Applicable law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. T. Approval required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by CITY. LICENSING DESIGNEE: Name of Busmess ignee's S' BY:�,'//cxa Q Print N e CITY OF MERIDIAN: BY: _ ITAMM d ERD, MAYOR Attest: --- , - T rD CIO CITY CLE City of E IDIA T<I)—�-- I6A110 F SEU w Fp a P h, TAF.\SU 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 6 OF 6 E IDIAN DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT /((J) (tt� �c n, -r' This DqG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT is made this T day of , 20AS, by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter r ferry to as "CITY," 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and '� �4'� �� , hereinafter referred to as "LICENSING DESIGNS ," whose business ad ress is A. Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights and obligations of CITY and of LICENSING DESIGNEE with reference to LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses on CITY's behalf. By entering into this agreement, both parties seek to: 1) encourage and facilitate the licensing of all dogs within the City of Meridian; and 2) implement the provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(H). B. Time of Performance: This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. C. Designation of authority: CITY hereby authorizes and empowers LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue dog licenses on behalf of CITY in accordance with all applicable provisions of Meridian City Code. D. Responsibilities of LICENSING DESIGNEE: 1. Issuance of dog licenses: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall issue dog licenses only after verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3, including, but not limited to: a. Verification that any dog to be licensed has a valid rabies vaccination in accordance with Meridian City Code section 6-2-3(D). b. Verification that the owner of any dog to be licensed is eligible for the license fee sought to be paid, i. e., whether dog to be licensed is neutered or spayed; whether dog owner/user is visually or hearing impaired or disabled; whether dog owner is training such dog as seeing eye, hearing ear, or guide dog; and/or whether replacement license tag will indeed replace validly issued, lost tag. c. Collection of appropriate license fee. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT X PAGE 1 OF 6 2. Official log: LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep an official, monthly, written log of all "dog licenses issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE on the form provided herewith entitled, "MONTHLY LOG — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE: [MONTH & YEAR]" (hereinafter "monthly log"). If such form is lost or rendered unusable for any reason whatsoever, LICENSING DESIGNEE must keep a written record including: the serial numbers of the dog license tags provided by CITY for issuance.by LICENSING DESIGNEE and shall also contain the following information as to each dog license issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE: a. date of issuance; b. dog license tag serial number; c. amount of license fee collected; d. amount of "administrative fee collected; e. name, address, and telephone number of dog owner; f. description of dog to be licensed; g. verification of documentation demonstrating dog owner's compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3; and h. verification of eligibility of dog owner to pay license fee sought to be paid. 3. Administrative fee: CITY hereby authorizes LICENSING DESIGNEE to collect and keep an administrative fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of each dog license fee collected on CITY's behalf. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall keep a record of dog license fees collected and administrative fees retained and shall report same to CITY in its annual report. 4. Monthly submission to City Clerk: At the end of each month during the term of this Agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf, and b. A true and correct copy of the LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly log; completed in full. Such fees and log shall be submitted to the Meridian City Clerk no later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the month following the month for which the fees were collected and the monthly log completed. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT 9 PAGE 2 OF 6 5. Annual submission to City Clerk: No later than January 15, 2016, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall submit to the Meridian City Clerk: a. All dog license tags provided by CITY to LICENSING DESIGNEE but unissued by LICENSING DESIGNEE; and b. An annual report, by completing in full the form provided herewith entitled, "ANNUAL REPORT — DOG LICENSES ISSUED BY LICENSING DESIGNEE." 6. Remission of discrepancy: If, following the Meridian City Clerk's monthly and/or annual review and accounting of LICENSING DESIGNEE's issuance of dog licenses as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, the Meridian City Clerk notifies LICENSING DESIGNEE of a discrepancy in fees collected and data reported by LICENSING DESIGNEE in the log or quantity of unissued tags, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of such discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE's obligation to remit to CITY funds in an amount corresponding to the number and type of dog licenses issued and the number of unissued dog license tags returned to CITY shall not be excused for any reason, regardless of LICENSING DESIGNEE's assertion of loss, theft, misplacement, mistake, or mismanagement of fees, tags, and/or data. E. Responsibilities of CITY: 1. Provision of dog license tags: CITY shall provide to LICENSING DESIGNEE "I uazttty dog license tags with the following serial numbers: ' R C° 1, - ,c which dog license tags are to be issued by LICENSING DESIGNEE only upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's verification of compliance with all provisions of Meridian City Code section 6-2-3. 2. Monthly accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's monthly remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on behalf of CITY and the official monthly log kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's log. In the event of a discrepancy between the log, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. 3. Annual accounting: Upon LICENSING DESIGNEE's remittance to the Meridian City Clerk of all dog license fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE, all official monthly 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 3 OF 6 logs kept by LICENSING DESIGNEE, unissued dog license tags, and LICENSING DESIGNEE's annual report, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting to determine that the fees remitted correspond to the number and type of dog license tags issued by the designee according to the designee's logs. In the event of a discrepancy between the logs, fees remitted, and/or unissued tags, the Meridian City Clerk shall notify LICENSING DESIGNEE in writing and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. F. Vicious dog licenses: This Agreement shall not authorize LICENSING DESIGNEE to issue vicious dog licenses on behalf of CITY. G. Independent Contractor: In all matters pertaining to this agreement, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be acting as an independent contractor, and neither LICENSING DESIGNEE nor any officer, employee or agent of LICENSING DESIGNEE will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the personnel of CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by CITY. H. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to CITY as follows: City Clerk, City of Meridian, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, or to LICENSING DESIGNEE as follows: _ Licen in Designee Business Name and Address Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. I. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning - this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate, subcontract,.or sell any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. K. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services set forth herein, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 4 OF 6 L. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. M. Audits and Inspections: At any time during business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of LICENSING DESIGNEE'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. N. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder, LICENSING DESIGNEE shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. O. Changes: Proposed changes to any portion of this Agreement shall be submitted in writing. The party to whom the change is proposed shall have thirty (3 0) days to accept or reject the proposed change. Changes which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment signed by both parties. P. Termination: 1. Written notice: If, through any cause, LICENSING DESIGNEE, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the Meridian City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving LICENSING DESIGNEE at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice. LICENSING DESIGNEE may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (15) calendar days written notice to CITY. 2. Remittance to CITY: In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or documents, data, and reports prepared by LICENSING DESIGNEE pursuant to Meridian City Code and/or under this Agreement, completed or incomplete, shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY all licensing fees collected by LICENSING DESIGNEE on CITY's behalf and all unissued dog license tags. Upon such remittance following termination, the Meridian City Clerk shall conduct an accounting(s) as set forth in sections E(2) and E(3) of this Agreement, and LICENSING DESIGNEE shall remit to CITY funds in the amount of the discrepancy. LICENSING DESIGNEE shall not thereby be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by LICENSING DESIGNEE. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve LICENSING DESIGNEE of its liability to the CITY for damages. 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT • PAGE 5 OF 6 Q. Construction and severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. R. Entire agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. S. Applicable law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. T. Approval required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by CITY. LICENSING DESIGNEE: NitrneApusiness D gnee's Signature BY. PAL�,U"a— Print Name TAMMWEERD, MAYOR Attest: Go"zp'cLD n uc.0 -+C ItY of IDIA li CITY CLE 11 �F SFAT• rhr TREASU� 2016 DOG LICENSING DESIGNEE AGREEMENT ■ PAGE 6 OF 6 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 5D PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approval of Task Order 10135.b Approval of Task Order 10135.b to MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES for the "SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT AT GREGORY LIFT STATION - DESIGN" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $115,367.00. MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Memo To: Jaycee L. Holman, City Clerk, From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager CC: Jacy Jones, Emily Skoro Date: 12/9/2015 Re: December 15th City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the December 15th City Council Consent Agenda for Council's consideration. Approval of Task Order 10135.b to MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES for the "SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT AT GREGORY LIFT STATION - DESIGN" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $115,367.00. Recommended Council Action: Award of Task Order 101353 to MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES for the Not -To -Exceed amount of $115,367.00. Thank you for your consideration. • Page 1 E IDIAN?�t. Public IDAHO Works Department TO: Keith Watts FROM: Emily Skoro Staff Engineer II DATE: 12/9/2015 Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: Charlie Rountree Keith Bird Joe Borton Luke Cavener Genesis Milam David Zaremba SUBJECT: TASK ORDER WITH MURRAY, SMITH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR GREGORY LIFT STATION SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT DESIGN FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $115,367.00, PURSUANT TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 22, 2013. I. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Emily Skoro, Staff Engineer II 489-0356 Clint Dolsby, Assistant City Engineer 489-1341 Warren Stewart, City Engineer 489-0350 Tom Barry, PW Director 489-0372 II. DESCRIPTION A. Background The City of Meridian is working toward abandoning existing lift stations and sewer lines that are in disrepair and located in areas with difficult maintenance access. The Gregory Lift Station was identified as being one such lift station. In FYI 5, the City conducted a feasibility study that confirmed that abandonment of the Gregory Lift Station was feasible with the construction of a sewer main extension. B. Proposed Project This project will install new gravity sewer lines that will allow the abandonment of Gregory Lift Station. While maintaining service to homes that are currently serviced by the Gregory Lift Station. The gravity lines will be installed in small sections of road near the existing Gregory Lift Station in NW Meridian. Page I of 3 C. Describe Item This portion of the project will develop bid ready design plans and specifications. Construction of this project is planned for FYI 7. III. IMPACT A. Fiscal Impacts A portion of the FYI Sewer Main Replacement Enhancement for $1,625,000.00 will provide funding for this project. Project Costs: ---------------------------------- Previous: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Fiscal Year 2015 ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ; Account Code / Codes Expenses ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------- Gregory Lift Station ; 60-3590-95000 $13,790.00 Feasibility Study ---------------------------------- --------------------------------- Total$13,790.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current: ------------------------ - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal Year 2016 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sewer Line Replacement --------- ----- - - ; 60-3590-95000 $115,367.00 at Gregory Lift Station Design - --------------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Total ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- $115,367.00 -------------------- Future: --------------------, --- Fiscal Year 2017 --------------------------- - - - - ------------- Sewer Line Replacement ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ; 60-3590-95000 $24,000.00 at Gregory Lift Station Construction Services and Record Drawings ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total $24,000.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ,----------------------- Total Estimated $153,157.00 Consulting Project Cost B. Alternatives The alternative to this design plan is to take no action and leave the lift station in service. The impacts of the no action alternative are leaving substandard sewer lines in service and continuing to incur operations and maintenance costs associated with operation of this lift station. Page 2 of 3 C. Time Constraints The time constraint for this project is to have a bid ready design package by September 2016. Bidding and construction are anticipated to start in October of FY17. Departmental Approval: e9x Page 3 of 3 Date: 11/30/2015 CONTRACT / AGENDA CHECKLIST REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works Fund: 60 Department: 3590 GL Account: 95000 Project # 10135.b Construction: Task Order x PSA Equipment Project Name: Sewer Line Replacement -Gregory Lift Station Project Manager: Emily Skoro Department Representative: Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Murray Smith & Associates Budget Available (Attach Report): yes Contract Amount: $115,367.00 Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No Budget Information: FY Budget: FY16 Enhancement #: Grant #: Other: Type of Grant: CONTRACTCHECKLIST BASIS OF AWARD Low Bidder Highest Rated Master Agreement x (Bid Results Attached) (Ratings Attached) (Category) 2C Typical Award Yes No If no please state circumstances and conclusion: Debarment Status (Grant/Federal Funded Projects Only) na (Type in date verified and the status) Date Award Posted: na 10 day protest period: na PW License # na Expiration Date na Corporation Status Goodstanding Insurance Certificates Received (Date): January 15, 2015 Expiration Date: January 4, 2016 Rating: A Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): na Rating: na Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes na No nan If yes, has policy been purchased? na (Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000) Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: December 9, 2015 Approval Date By: Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: (Only for non Public Works Project) TASK ORDER NO. 10135.b Pursuant to the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN (OWNER) AND MURRAY, SMITH AND ASSOCIATES, INC (ENGINEER) This Task Order is made this day of December, 2015 and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "City", and accepted by (MURRAY, SMITH AND ASSOCIATES INC) hereinafter referred to as "Engineer" pursuant to the mutual promises, covenant and conditions contained in the Master Agreement (Category 2c) between the above mentioned parties dated October 22, 2013. The Project Name for this Task Order 10135.b is as follows: CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT AT GREGORY LIFT STATION - DESIGN PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City would like to abandon the Gregory Lift Station, located northeast of the intersection of NW 91h Avenue and W Carlton Avenue (south of Meridian Middle School). The City would also like to abandon existing gravity lines located along back lot lines with no maintenance access for the following locations: • South of Camellia Ln between NW 11th Street and NW 8th Street • West of NW 8th Street between W Camellia Lane and W. Carlton Avenue This will require construction of a new gravity sewer line on W, Washington Drive between NW 11 th Street and NW 9th Avenue Street, W. Camellia Lane, NW 11 th Street and NW 12th Avenue. The design will include approximately 2,500 LF of new sewer line and 48 new sewer services. Project feasibility investigation has been done in the previous Task Order (10135.a) to spot-check and determine the feasibility for abandoning the Gregory Lift Station. The investigation included spot-checking 4 residential service locations being served the Lift Station and pre -designing the gravity sewer routing. Task Order 10185.b Sewer Line Replacement At Gregory Lift Station - Design Page 1 of 8 Murray, Smith And Associates, Inc This SOW builds on the findings determined from the initial investigation to meet the City's gravity sewer service goals. Field work, full sewer design and development of construction documents are provided in this SOW. Services during construction are provided as an optional task. General description of project/services rendered by Consultant/Engineer. SCOPE OF WORK Task 1 —Project Management Subtask 1.1— Kickoff Meeting No kickoff meeting is planned to occur. Due to the continuing nature of this project both MSA and the City are familiar with the project goals, constraints and limits. Subtask 1.2 — General Project Management and Meetings The purpose of this task is to manage the project team, schedule, and budget. This includes monthly invoicing (invoices will include progress in terms of project percent complete), budget (percent spent and budget remaining) and schedule review, updates, and general administrative tasks. At a minimum, MSA's project manager (PM) will hold monthly teleconferences with the City's PM to provide project status updates. Additional status meetings are described in the subsequent project tasks. Monthly invoices will include updates on project schedule and budget. Task 1 Assumptions 1. One (1) hour per month have been budgeted for project management and meeting time for the project's eight (8) -month project duration (design only). 2. No MSA travel time will be charged. Task 1 Deliverables 1. Monthly project updates (submitted with invoice) that summarize each month's budget, schedule, and work accomplished. Task 2 — Data Collection ENGINEER will perform the following tasks as part of a data collection effort prior to development of design plans and specifications. Task Order 10135.b Sewer Line Replacement At Gregory Lift Station - Design Page 2 of 8 Murray, Smith And Associates, Inc Task 2,1- Data Collection In this task, ENGINEER will review background information provided by the CITY and may develop a formal data request for any additional information required for completion of the work. It is anticipated that additional data requests will be made throughout the project, however the majority of the data required will be requested at the beginning of the project. MSA will limit the number of data requests that are made to minimize the required CITY's Staff time. Task 2.2 - Sewer Service Coordination MSA will work with the CITY to identify the locations of existing sewer services and coordinate new sewer service alignment with property owners. Approximately 43 sewer services will be located as part of this task. These locates will be performed in addition to the previous 5 sewer service locates for a project total of 48 service connections. Services will be located by visual inspection of existing cleanouts outside the building and by locating the service in the crawl space where it exits the building. Service locations will be marked in the field based on measurements off existing building features. The budget includes time for a CCTV/locate sub -consultant in cases where the sewer service location cannot be readily measured from existing features and visual inspection in the crawl space. There may be cases where the sub -consultant will need to access the building sewer vent on the roof or remove a toilet to CCTWlocate the line. Task 2.3 - Sewer Service Survey MSA will provide survey for the following: • x,y,z data for the 43 sewer services identified in Task 2.2 • x,y,z data for 5 storm manholes in the project area • x,y,z data for 3 storm catch basins in the project area. • x,y,z data for the 4 potholes identified in Task 2.4. Surface elevations will be provided for these locations • Land monuments in the project area. • Roadway curb and gutter and centerline if available. • Potable water valves, fire hydrants and water meters within the project area. • Underground utilities as identified by utility locate services Task Order 10135.b Sewer Line Replacement At Gregory Lift Station - Design Page 3 of 8 Murray, Smith And Associates, Inc Task Z4 - Potholing MSA will perform potholing to confirm existing asphalt, base and subbase depths and confirm location of existing utilities at critical locations in the project area. This task includes 4 total pothole locations. These locations will require traffic control. Assumptions 1. ENGINEER and the CITY will identify and collect required data in a timely manner so as to not impact the project schedule. 2. The data collection does not include survey or excavation to verify number and location of side sewer connections into the main. This task order assumes that MSA will locate and survey side sewer cleanouts that are observed from the surface. In addition, the construction contractor will be required to perform field verification of all side sewer connections as part of the contract. 3. All work will be based on sewer service locations from the OWNER CCTV tapes (main line), side sewer location services, observations from site investigations, and a survey point of the sewer service as it exits the building. 4. ENGINEER will contact ACHD to verify if there are moratoriums on construction in the project area. 5. SOW assumes that an Ada County Highway District (ACRD) permit for potholing is required, but the fee will be waived. 6. ENGINEER will send flyers to property owners notifying them of the project. Flyer will be approved by City prior to delivery to property owners. 7. Make initial contact with property owners (CITY staff may attend). 8. Visit all properties where sewer services will be affected by the project, determine location of sewer service line and develop preferred sewer service route with property owner and CITY staff. 9. Survey horizontal locations and ground elevations of existing side sewers at the exit of existing structures. The ground elevation and data from the sewer service locate will be used to approximate sewer service elevation. 10. Develop schematic drawing of proposed sewer service route and send to property owners and CITY for review and approval. 11.A budget of 20 hours for pre -field work, contact of property owners and documentation of the proposed sewer service routes and a surveyed point of service connection. Ten, 8 -hour days of fieldwork for one ENGINEER staff are included in this task. 12.The routes will be field measured and documented with digital photos. 13. ENGINEER will verify water service size and number of services in each box during field work. 14. Any required permitting fees will be paid by the CITY. Task Order 10135.b Sewer Line Replacement At Gregory Lift Station - Design Page 4 of 8 Murray, Smith And Associates, Inc Deliverables 1. Formal data request(s) Task 3 —Design ENGINEER will develop concept, 60%, 95% and 100% designs for the work described in the background section of this SOW. ENGINEER will then develop a construction package for the improvements. Task 3.1- Concept Design MSA will perform a data analysis effort that includes the following tasks: 1. Review CCTV inspection tapes and reports. 2. Analysis of field investigation information. 3. Review of existing plans to assist in identifying locations of existing cleanouts and side sewers. 4. Review as -built maps for existing utilities (e.g. water, gas, power) in the proposed project area. ENGINEER will analyze the previously proposed sewer alignment with the new information to determine if the route remains viable. Sewer services not serviced by the previous sewer conceptual design will be included in this concept design. Conceptual level construction cost estimates will be developed during this task and used to compare the alternatives. ENGINEER will present the results of the concept design at a review meeting with the CITY. Any alternatives alignment options will be presented for selection by the CITY. Task 3.2 - 60% Design ENGINEER will develop the 60% design package based on the concept design presented to the CITY. 60% Design Development will include the following: ® Plan and Profile Sheets ® Standard Notes and Details specific to the project. (Standard details are not required) ® Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) plan as required by Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) and ACHD. (The plan will be reviewed by the City of Meridian Environmental Division) ® ACHD Variance Request (if required) ® Traffic Control Plan ® Technical Specifications Task Order 10135.b Sewer Line Replacement At Gregory Lift Station - Design Page 5 of 8 Murray, Smith And Associates, Inc • Bid Schedule • Opinion of probable cost for work Reassessment of design schedule The 60% design plans and specifications will be submitted to the City for review and comment by the Development Services and Environmental Divisions. ENGINEER will attend a meeting with the CITY to review the 60% design package and perform a site walk through. Task 3.3 - 959*1 Design Package ENGINEER will develop a 95% design package based on the comments on the Concept Design and 60% Design. The 95% design package will include the following final documents: • Plan and Profile Sheets • Erosion and Soil Control Plan (ESC) as required by the City of Meridian, IDEA and ACHD • Traffic Control Plan as required by ACHD • Notes and Details specific to the project, standard details are not required • Technical Specifications • Side Sewer Details • Bid Schedule with quantities • Opinion of Probable Cost The 95% plans are assumed to be "bid ready" and are only missing minor CITY, NMID and ACHD comments and approvals. The 95% design plans and specifications will be submitted to the City for review and comment by the Development Services and Environmental Divisions. ENGINEER may attend a meeting with the CITY to review comments from the 95% design package, if needed. Engineer will provide six hard copies of the plans and three hard copies of the specifications to the City for review and comment. Task 3.5 - 100% Design Package ENGINEER will finalize the 100% design package based on the comments on the 95% plans. The 100% design package will include the following FINAL documents with all the approval stamps and signatures: • Plan and Profile Sheets • Erosion and Soil Control Plan (ESC) as required by City of Meridian, IDEQ and ACRD. • Traffic Control Plan as required by ACHD and with an ACHD signature • Notes and Details specific to the project, standard details are not required • Technical Specification Package Task Order 10135.b Sewer Line Replacement At Gregory Lift Station - Design Page 6 of S Murray, Smith And Associates, Inc ® Side Sewer Details • Bid Schedule ® Opinion of Probable Cost The 100% design plans and specifications will be submitted to the City for approval signature and inclusion in the bid package. Assumptions 1. The entire project will be designed with plan and profiles for traditional open trench construction. 2. Variance requests for "out of corridor work" will be submitted to ACHD and any other utilities affected. Approval letters from those utilities will be submitted to the City of Meridian prior to commencing the 100% design plans. 3. The budget assumes up to four (4) hours of meetings with ACHD and NMID to review the design packages during the design phase. 4. The CITY will provide a QLPE review of the plans in lieu of submittal to the IDEA. 5. ENGINEER will prepare the Technical Specifications to The Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) and CITY supplements and Addenda will be used as the basis of the Technical Specifications and they will be in the ISPWC formatting. ISPWC specifications will be referenced and not reproduced in the specification package. Supplemental technical specifications will be developed as required. (Specifications will state specifically what points shall be staked with a reference that the contractor will pay for additional staking or restaking) 6. The CITY will prepare the "front end" bid specification section. 7. The CITY will administer the contract. 8. Plans will be full size (22 -inch x 34 -inch). 9. Any required permitting fees will be paid by the CITY. Deliverables 1. Concept design, presented in email format. 2. Three (3) hard copies of the 60% and one (1) file in PDF format (to be placed on the City of Meridian FTP site) design package (plans and technical specifications) 3. Six (6) hard copies of the 95% design package (plans and technical specifications) 4. One (1) reproducible copy of the FINAL 100% design package in PDF format to be placed on the City of Meridian FTP site. Task Order 10135.b Sewer Line Replacement At Gregory Lift Station - Design Page 7 of 8 Murray, Smith And Associates, Inc TIME OF COMPLETION and COMPENSATION SCHEDULE The following schedule is based on a Notice to Proceed (NTP) from the City by December 2015 and resulting in Final Design being completed by June 2016. A NTP issued on a different date will change the schedule accordingly. The Not -To -Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order No. 10135.b is one hundred fifteen three hundred sixty seven dollars ($115,367.00). No compensation will be paid over the Not -to -Exceed amount without prior written approval by the City in the form of a Change Order. Any and all travel will only be reimbursed if pre -approved by the Project Manager, and only per the City of Meridian Travel Policy. Reimbursable expenses will be paid at cost and only if pre -approved by the Project Manager. Any travel and/or reimbursables paid will be paid as part of the Not -To - Exceed Task Order Total per the Compensation and Completion Schedule above. CITY OF MERIDIAN____— BY: TAM Y de � RD, MAYOR Dated: la 115 bS Approved by HOLMAN, CITY CLERK MURRAY, SMITH AND ASS CIATES, INC BY: '- DENNIS GALINAT P.E., Senior Engineer, Associate city of ID SEAL r . Purchasing Approval. `'RE,a`.:"�- BY: KEITH W,&_TSr0urq)3a9Vng Manager wARREN STEWART, Engineering Manager Dated: ;; - � � e City Project Manager Emily Skoro Task Order 10135.b Sewer Line Replacement At Gregory Lift Station - Design Page 8 of 8 Murray, Smith And Associates, Inc COMPENSATION AND COMPLETION' SCHEDULE Task Description Due Date Compensation 1 Project Management ■ June 30, 2016 $2,013 2 Data Collection ■ June 30, 2016 $44,089 3 Design ■ June 30, 2016 $69,265 TASK ORDER TOTAL: $115,367 The Not -To -Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order No. 10135.b is one hundred fifteen three hundred sixty seven dollars ($115,367.00). No compensation will be paid over the Not -to -Exceed amount without prior written approval by the City in the form of a Change Order. Any and all travel will only be reimbursed if pre -approved by the Project Manager, and only per the City of Meridian Travel Policy. Reimbursable expenses will be paid at cost and only if pre -approved by the Project Manager. Any travel and/or reimbursables paid will be paid as part of the Not -To - Exceed Task Order Total per the Compensation and Completion Schedule above. CITY OF MERIDIAN____— BY: TAM Y de � RD, MAYOR Dated: la 115 bS Approved by HOLMAN, CITY CLERK MURRAY, SMITH AND ASS CIATES, INC BY: '- DENNIS GALINAT P.E., Senior Engineer, Associate city of ID SEAL r . Purchasing Approval. `'RE,a`.:"�- BY: KEITH W,&_TSr0urq)3a9Vng Manager wARREN STEWART, Engineering Manager Dated: ;; - � � e City Project Manager Emily Skoro Task Order 10135.b Sewer Line Replacement At Gregory Lift Station - Design Page 8 of 8 Murray, Smith And Associates, Inc e a rt N C, J C) r r r r N O O O o 0 n m u n r w o K w N n Ft0 o N N tY N n £ w a n H t) C) O [=i N H b b H It [�] x 0n a to :E It z(n ro G) m ,(D (D r x roIt a a (Dm ma 0�Em nnm < ro th n �m £ aro rt £ (D (D£ 0 z 0 Fi K r+ (D rt ri (D r (D H a H N N (D o� H I LQ (D tJ O H C 0 0 rt d H n fh 0 F'- O o O. (D fi 0 W C Sl (D a - N K Ca N t" H C n z w P. r- �� Cn w N- P. P. K C 7o rt E !EC'�J SD (D O- zrt H' iq C� rpt a n N C rt C N (D C�=1 Uri r 10 10 0 N O(D C r C rt O K rt (Dro r- O N 0 (D I (D � (D W (D (D z rt¢cit I ft z Cn m < rt a fD It O O O .p 61 R (D t(D lD lD to J N OD N N W N CL r+ r P ,p o N £ C� cn cn cn u, u, cn 0 0 0 o 0 o (D (,- rr rt O O O 61 O O O O .p n C FS r r r rs cn v, rs m r N N rt� W W W l0 N A O0 a co O N O N r J N O r N 00 OJ N O O O O N O FS N Cn Ct O O O co) Cn O r r r r r- IQ r r r lD 0 0 o cn C, � •p r �o o P.rr r Ol Ol Ol .P W r J N o � IQ N N o 0 0 00 0 N Ct Ct Ol O O O N m m to 0 a� r r p (D rt rt w w w o 0 0 0 0 0 �J O IQ h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J oM J op O oW O aM O o',4 O 0 O O 0 o1. a rt m m It It 0 I -h (D < (D 7 r W C O � 1 N 1p N 0 o I m O sa � o 0 10 rt FC u ro H ft Fh 0 Fh x rt G o rt N• (D h 0 ((D a F \ ro O O a < U. N (D a rn M x 'O (D o 0 O n rt I x a rt K S I OZ/£/Z I Iw}u'980 £L I D/daoo/sos/oijgnd/-'9ao•ouvpissaoou•mmm//: djjq abed awoH ouePI do 94e1S Med u!eW s,a4e4S 40 ae4@.aoaS ouePI Tewaoj ddIl a ewI 021/Vd Ma!n TewaoJ dad a ewI MD!n ONHO 900Z aeaA ao; laodeN au!!u0 Tuawnooa nna!A Dd0d-2i -lvnNNV SOOZ aeaAao; jaoda21 au!!u0 quawnooa nna!A au!!u0 4uawnooa Ma!n au!!u0 Tuawnooa nna!n au!!u0 Tuawnooa nna!n ou!!u0 4uawnooa nna!n au!!u0 Tuownooa nna!n au!lu0 Tuawnooa nna!A [ ddIl nna!ATu!ad aW IaH 4ewaoT ddI.l a ewI M@IT 4ewaoJ dad a ewI main [ ddIl Male Iu!-Jd GW OPH l 1210d=i21 -lvnNNV 60OZ aeaA io; laoda21 12iOdD'd -lvnNNV OTOZ aeaA aol 1.iodaN Ild 0 d 9'divnNNV TTOZ aeeA jo;;aoda'M 12iOdD'd -lvnNNV ZTOZ seal( io;;.iodaa I'd 0dDd ivnNNV ETOZ aeaA io; 4.aodaN 12iOdg21 ivnNNV vTOZ aeaA aol poda21 BdOdD2i -lvnNNV STOZ aeaA aol Taoda-d AII210Hinv d0 DIV3IdI-L21=iO LOOZ AeW bT pol!d e uole:] feua a.1 9TOZ AeW :and :aoda21 lenuud STOZ ung ZZ :aaoda21 lenuuV Tse-I;o algia :saae4S T)04S pazl.'044nV to iagLunN VOZL6 210 '(INV-Il2JOd 006 DIS 1S NOWIVS MS TZT [ s u!I!T ssau!snq 'DNI S91VIOOSSV'8 HAWS AV2i no aoq!uoW ] [ 'ONI S�IIVIOOSSV'8 HAWS AvV n nw aoi aouaTs!xa To aTeo!T!),Jaa e 4a9 ] [ AjewwnS o4� e9 ] [ uaaeaS n @N a4e4S 3o Ajejan@S 'Aauuaa aouaaame-I • so' ZJo I ai?L'd Xjpug ssouisng Suimarn SOSQI :.iagLunN 9802/TO 6uilld / aI leuolleziue6a0 90/-28 m 'DSIOq SI121f1O N 6TZZ all SDOIA'dgS ONIIV'dOd'dODNI :Tua6d paaalsl6a21 leil!ul :uoljezuoy;nV/uoljeul6l.a0 LOOZ AeW t T ;o area NOE)TdO :ul61.a0 do OMS ONI INVISa000 :sn;e;S SSSNISfl9 'lV'dDN9O 'NOIlV'dOd2!OO :ssauisn8 jo adA.L VOZL6 210 '(INV-Il2JOd 006 DIS 1S NOWIVS MS TZT [ s u!I!T ssau!snq 'DNI S91VIOOSSV'8 HAWS AV2i no aoq!uoW ] [ 'ONI S�IIVIOOSSV'8 HAWS AvV n nw aoi aouaTs!xa To aTeo!T!),Jaa e 4a9 ] [ AjewwnS o4� e9 ] [ uaaeaS n @N a4e4S 3o Ajejan@S 'Aauuaa aouaaame-I • so' ZJo I ai?L'd Xjpug ssouisng Suimarn SOSQI SIOZ/£/ZI IWIT980£LI0/daoo/sos/oilgnd/i?io•ouupissaaoL,•mAtm//:dilu no •ogepi•sos@oJuisos :o4 pollewa aq uea suopsa66ns ao suopsanb 's4uawwoD Z Jo Z 35Ld /,Klug ssautsng 5uima. SOSQI FrnrunavJ 544ula IIV-NUI1Vt1Udt10U pNOOV jo sinew pamsl6aa ale o6ol pue aweu ONOOV 941 3N1ViN3S3adU 03ZIuoH1nV 'SNOISIAOLId A01 -10d 3H1 H11M 3ONVON000V NI 03L13AI130 38 THM 3011ON 'd03H3H1 31VO NOIIVNIdX3 3Hi 3a0d38 03113ONVO 38 S3101 -10d 0391HOS30 3AOSV 3H1 d0 ANV 01(10HS NOIIV119ON VO (Bo/6LOZ) 5Z ONOOV Zb9£8 QI 'ueTpTzaW 9AV AVMpeO,zg 3 ££ TIeTPTa9N 30 A1T0 •aoexauoo uaAllam Aq paxTnbea uagw saToTTod paouaxa;ax anoge agq uo poansuT TeuI;aTppe se paueu sT ueTPTaeN ;o AITD iags"d u2TPT1aP1 90 AaTO : 1000O3d VSN :ani (pajinbei sl eoeds ejow A lopipapS sluewe8 IeuogIPPV'loL ONOOV 4oeAV) S3131HSA I SNOUVOM I SNOURSdO d0 NOLWIHOS30 000 OOSS 11MIA0110d'3SV3SICI VIN M0IegSNOI1Vu3dOdONOI1dJ80 iapun oquosop''� 11 (HN U1tdOWPuaW) L030n1OX3 83GV43WI83OL-IAO 3AI.LnO3X3M3NiuVdM0131adOadANV 000'0065 31101dW3V3 3SV3SI0'1'3 000'00SS IN30100VHOV3'T3 2131—Ts-DIM 1A2101X N / A A1I119VI1 Su3AOldW3 ONV Hl0 '51V1SOM 9T0Z/T0/TT STOZ/TO/TT Mews99M68 N011VSN3dW03Su3NUOM 8 S 000 0TSNOUN313u 1-X-] 030 000'000'£s 31V03800V 9TOZ/10/11 SIOZ/10/1T TZ6090M8S6a V 30VWSWIV10 8noo0 X evil Mom evilvliaveWn X 000'000'£S 30N3Nun300HOV3 s SOlnV S01nV03NIH sluaplooeJed) 30VWVO Alu3dOud 03NMO,NON SOinV S (WOR -11 Jed) AunfNI A11008some 9TOZ/TO/11 STOZ/TO/TT £66LN492n60 A 031n03HOS 03NM011V O1nV ANV unievn31180WOlnV X 0 S (uosied 1ed) ANnf NI A11008 00010001TS UU811MO 11 imn3l0NIS03Ni8WOO S 001 'MidX AOI10d 'IBd S3IlddV lIW1131V03800V IN30 000' 000' 6S 00V dO/dW03 • S10nO0ud 000'000165 91V03800VIV83N30 000' 000' ZS kuntN( AOV I NNOMMd an000 ❑X 30VW-SWIV10 000'OTS (uosiedouoAuV)dX303W 000'000'ZS 0ouailn00003 S3SIW3Nd 031N3ao,L39 Ma_ TORS gLTrl •3oxd A1n18VnlV83N301V1083WWO0 X 000'0001ZS 30N31un000HOV3 9TOZ/1O/TT STOZ/TO/TT TZ6090M8S68 A A11118VI11VUSN30 V SIM -1 tAAAMa/WWJ LkAAAMCVWWIu38WnNA0110d30NVanSNId03dA1 all dX3In"'QA dd3A0I10d u OOV HSNI 'SWIV10 alVd A9 030n038 N338 3AVH AVW NMOHS S11WI1 •S31onOd HOnS d0 SNO1110N00 0NV SNOISMOX3 'SWUM 3H1 llV Ol 1o3f8nS SI NI3a3H CIMINOS30 S310110d 3H1 A8 030NOddV 30NVanSN1 3HI UVINBd AVW NO 03nSS1 38 AVW 31VOIJUN30 SIHI HOW OJ. 103dS3a H11M 1N3Wn000 N3H10 NO lOV81N00 ANV d0 NOI110N00 NO Wdl31 '1NMauln03a ANV EINIONVISHIMLON '031VOI0NI 001M3d AOIIOd 31-11 NOd 9A08V 03WVN 03NnSN1 3Hi 0103nSS1 N338 9AVH MO -138 031SI1 30NV2lnSNl d0 S3I0110d 31-111VH1 AdLLL130 Ol SI SIHl -tJ3H1NIIN NUISIAdd ;tiauuynN 41VU1jI1t13U S30VU3A03 d a3unSNl 3 HaHnSNI :au3anSNi 60ZL6 W 'pueTgxOd 006 '94S 'UOWTVS 'M'S TZT WOE 00 aauexnsuI sz94t2nzapun p20;41eH:oH9unSN1 ovI OossV 9 g�Twg �AezznW OOOTT p q Auudtuoo aouexnsul TauTIu9S:6u3un8N1 03unSNl LSEZZI 00 4Tuwapul 3 4u8pio0V px0;IzeH:VuaunSN1 0OWN 30Vu3A000N10uOddVISla3un8NI TOT£9 ON 9Tn07 'IS woo gszewpOgsanbazguaTTo0a0e:SS3u00V OOTT 'ads '4a914S 49NIV14 TOL 11VW3 'DUI VS[1 gszeW ;O UOTSTATp e ELT£-TZ9-888'ON ')DIV) T-006'NHBOd sutezboza paxosuod g gszeW 3N J.DVINOO u30nOoad s ;uawaslopua 43ns jo nail ul japlo4 alenylliao a41 of s14611 aajuon jou scop alengljlao s14i uo juawalejs V •;uawaslopua ue unbal Am salallod uleljao'Aopod eqj jo suolllpuoo pue swlal 841 of lDafgns '03AIVM SI NOI1V90N8nS jl 'paslopue aq lsnw (sal)Anllod a4j'03mml 'IVNOLLIUdV ue sl lap104 01e01MV93 94111 :1NVINOdWI 'N30"IOH 31VOIdum 3Hi 0NV 'N30n0ONd NO 3ALLVINMUcI N 03ZINOH1nV '(S)2132 ml DWSSI 31-11 N33M138 13VNIN00 V 31n1LLSN00 ION S300 30NVNnSNI d0 31V3Id111830 SIH1 'MO -138 S310110d 31-11 AS 030HOAAV 30VH3A00 31.11 N311V NO 0N31X3 '0N3WV A-13AI1VEGN NO A13AIIVWNIddV ION 5300 31VOId111830 SIH; 'N30'lOH 31VOIAMN30 31-11 NOdn SIHSIN ON 9M3dNO0 0NV A1NO NOLLVWNOANI d0 N311VW V SV 03nSSl SI 31VOIdmm30 SIHi STOZ,E33NvunSN1 AIIII VII �0 31V31:11IM30 cAAAA/arvww131Va va Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 5E PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: MDC Contribution to Youth Farmers Market Memorandum of Agreement For Meridian Development Corporation's Contribution To Meridian Youth Farmer's Market MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR CONTRIBUTION TO DOWNTOWN YOUTH FARMERS' MARKET This MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR CONTRIBUTION TO MARKET ("Agreement") is made this jQ- day of December, 2015 (`Effective Date"), by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("City"), and Meridian Development Corporation, an urban renewal agency organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("MDC"). WHEREAS, City and MDC desire to promote economic activity in the downtown area; WHEREAS, MDC and the City desire to cooperate and work together regarding the Meridian Youth Farmers' Market ("Market") in downtown Meridian; WHEREAS, MDC and the City recognize the benefits of the Market in promoting, revitalizing and maintaining entrepreneurship, economic development and commercial activity in the urban renewal district, and for these reasons, MDC is willing to contribute financial support to the City specifically for the Market in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00); NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties agree as follows: I. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES. A. Meridian Youth Farmer's Market 2016 Market planning and presentation. City, by and through a contracted promoter, shall present a weekly Meridian Youth Farmer's Market 2016 ("Market"), between June 25, 2016 and September 24, 2016. B. Publicity. City shall publicize the Market, which publicity may include distribution of information via written and broadcast media, social and online media, e-mail, posters, and a banner displayed at Meridian City Hall. Decisions regarding the time, place, and manner of such publicity shall be made by City. C. Invoice MDC. City shall provide one (1) invoice to MDC by February 1, 2016, in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), and City shall use such amount for the payment of expenses related to the planning and presentation of the Market. II. MDC'S RESPONSIBILITIES. A. Payment. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of City's invoice, MDC shall provide payment to City in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00). B. Appropriation. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, MDC's obligations under this Agreement to provide payment to City as described herein shall be MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR DOWNTOWN MARKET CONTRIBUTION PAGE 1 OF 3 subject to and dependent upon appropriations being made by the MDC governing board for such purpose. III. GENERAL TERMS. A. Term. This Agreement begins immediately upon execution and shall remain in effect through September 30; 2016. B. Notice. Notice required to be provided by either of the parties under this Agreement shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed by United States Mail, addressed as follows: City: City of Meridian MDC: Meridian Development Corporation City Attorney's Office 104 East Fairview Avenue #239 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian ID 83642 Meridian ID 83642 Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving formal notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. C. Entire agreement; modification. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, negotiations, representations, and discussions, whether verbal or written, of the parties pertaining to that subject matter. The Agreement may not be changed, amended, or superseded unless by means of writing executed by both Parties hereto. D. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement in whole, or in part, due to convenience, nonappropriation, or when either or both parties agree that the continuation of the project is not in the parties' best interest, by providing thirty (30) days written notice. E. Hold harmless. For purposes of or in furtherance of this Agreement, each party and each of its employees, agents, contractors, officials, officers, servants, guests, and/or invitees, shall save and hold harmless the other party from and for any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused or incurred by either party or any employee, agent, contractor, official, officer, servant, guest, and/or invitee thereof. F. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. The invalidity or unenforceability of any particular provision of this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if any invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. G. Applicable Law. The Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho and MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR DOWNTOWN MARKET CONTRIBUTION PAGE 2 OF 3 jurisdiction for any disputes arising hereunder shall be in the Fourth Judicial District, Ada County, State of Idaho. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this -Ti day of December, 2015. MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: y. Uw'Eseebff, c4i ,- 4a- a'SO4-"' L)'L' C � CITY OF MERIDIAN: Tammy de Via rd, Mayor Attest ave Winder, Secretary Attest: I city of Ja ee�H lman, City Clerk II ^IDIW) SEAL, TFH°f the YR1,�5��� MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR DOWNTOWN MARKET CONTRIBUTION PAGE 3 OF 3 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 5F PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Purchase Order approval for purchase of Z34/22 Purchase Order approval for purchase of Z34/22 IC Articulating Z Boom Lift from ONE SOURCE EQUIPMENT and Authorization for the Purchasing Manager to Sign the Purchase Order for the Not -To -Exceed amount of $58,500.91 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Page 1 Memo To: Jaycee L. Holman, City Clerk, From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager CC: Jacy Jones, Laurelei McVey Date: 12-8-2015 Re: December 15 , 2015 City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the December 15 th City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration. Purchase Order approval for purchase of Z34/22 IC Articulating Z Boom Lift from ONE SOURCE EQUIPMENT and Authorization for the Purchasing Manager to Sign the Purchase Order for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $58,500.91 Recommended Council Action: Approval of purchase of a Z34/22 IC Articulating Z Boom Lift and from ONE SOURCE, INC for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $58,500.91 and authorize the Purchase Manager to sign the Purchase Order. This purchase is being made from the HGACBuy contract (a cooperative contract) that has been reviewed and approved by Legal. This purchase is part of the approved 2016 Budget. Thank you for your consideration. City of Meridian Purchasing Dept. Contract No.: CM02-15 Date Prepared: 10/21/2015 Buying Agency: Contractor: Contact Person: Prepared By: Phone: Phone: Fax: Fax: Email: Email: Product Code: DA18 Description: 45901 Cost Cost N/C Subtotal B: 0 Cost Cost 5792.55 1979.8 Subtotal C: 7772.35 17% D. Total Cost before any other applicable Charges, Trade-Ins, Allowances, Discounts, Etc. (A+B+C) 1 53673.35 = Subtotal D: 53673.35 Cost Cost 4827.56 Subtotal E: 4827.56 58500.91 F. Total Purchase Price (D+E): Delivery Date: Approx 5 weeks Subtotal From Additional Sheet(s): Quantity Ordered: For this transaction the percentage is: Check: Total cost of Unpublished Options (C) cannot exceed 25% of the total of the Base Unit Price plus Published Options (A+B). X Subtotal of A + B + C: E. Other Charges, Trade-Ins, Allowances, Discounts, Etc. CONTRACT PRICING WORKSHEET For Standard Equipment Purchases Z34/22 IC, Articulating Z Boom Lift, Diesel Engine,40ft 6in working height, 22ft horizontal reach A. Product Item Base Unit Price Per Contractor's H-GAC Contract: This Worksheet is prepared by Contractor and given to End User. If a PO is issued, both documents MUST be faxed to H-GAC @ 713-993-4548. Therefore please type or print legibly. Cindy Todd 972-594-0927 cindy@onesourceequipment.com Subtotal From Additional Sheet(s): Description Description City of Meridian Idaho Mr. Tony Bernard 208-888-2191 tbernard@meridiancity.org One Source Equipment B. Published Options - Itemize below - Attach additional sheet if necessary - Include Option Code in description if applicable (Note: Published Options are options which were submitted and priced in Contractor's bid.) Description Description Engine Option: 31 hp Kubota DF-972 Gas/LPG C. Unpublished Options - Itemize below - Attach additional sheet if necessary (Note: Unpublished options are items which were not submitted and priced in Contractor's bid.) Upgrade to 4WD Unit Delivery: Meridian City, Idaho 2 platform mounted work lights Light Package: 2 chassis mounted work lights, Description Description CONTRACT PRICING VERIFICATION TO: FROM: Tony Bernard/Kathy Wanner Veronica Johnson COMPANY: DATE: City of Meridian 12/03/2015 PHONE NUMBER: 208-888-2191 RE: REFERENCE: Price Verification for 1) Z34/22 IC, Articulating Z Boom Lift, Diesel Engine, 40ft. 6in Working Height, 22ft. horizontal reach 2)Genie GTH 1056 Telehandler Contract Pricing Worksheet dated 10/21-15 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I have reviewed the pricing worksheet provided through HGACBuy the above referenced items My review verifies the pricing worksheet provided is in compliance with the contract for the Z34/22IC, Articulating Z Boom Lift, Diesel Engine, 40ft. 6in. Working Height 22ft. horizontal reach . My review for the Genie GTH 1056 Telehandler found that further review is needed prior to issuing a verification. I should receive an answer from our Purchasing Coordinator no later than 12/7/15. Once his review is complete I will contact you with the finding. When you are ready please make your Purchase Order out to the vendor and send a copy of the Purchase Order and HGACBuy Worksheet to veronica.johnson@h-gac.com or fax 713-993-4548 and also send a copy of the Purchase Order to the vendor. Please advise if we can assist further in this matter. Thank You PO Box 22777 3555 Timmons Ln. Houston, Texas 77227-2777 1-800-926-0234 C ENTRAL FAX# 713.993 .4548 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 5G PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0006 ITEM TITLE: Baltic Place Addition -MDA Amended Development Agreement Baltic Place Addition - MDA (H-2015- 0006) Located at 1 151 E. Kalispell Street, in the NE 1/4 of Section 18, T.3N., R.1 E. MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 5H PROJECT NUMBER: PP -15-018 ITEM TITLE: Findings of Fact PP 15-018 Sundial Circle Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law: PP 15-018 Sundial Circle Subdivision by Conger Management Group Located 2250 W. Whitelaw Drive Request: Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of Eleven (11) Single Family Residential Lots and One (1) Common Lot on Approximately 2.54 Acres in the R-4 Zoning District MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Parks and Recreation 2016 Pathway Priority Task List Resolution No. K' �\10`-j : Resolution of the Parks and Recreation Commission - 2016 Pathway Priority Task List MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 15-//O.� BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADOPTING THE 2016 PRIORITY TASK LIST FOR MERIDIAN PATHWAYS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Meridian City Code section 2-4-2(7) charges the Parks and Recreation Commission with setting priority to plans, recommendations and suggestions for the future growth and development pathways throughout the city, subject to approval by the Mayor and City Council; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2015, the Commission unanimously voted to recommend to the Mayor and City Council that certain enumerated tasks be adopted as the City's priorities in improving the community's pathway system in 2016; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council find that it is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Meridian to adopt such recommended priorities; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the tasks and priorities assigned thereto enumerated in the Resolution of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission, adopted by the Commission on December 9, 2015, and attached hereto as Exhibit A, are hereby accepted and adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian. Section 2. That the Director of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is authorized to carry out said tasks, in such manner and timeframe, and as allowed by the annual budget appropriations for the Parks and Recreation Department, per the discretion of the Director. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. 2015. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 15th day of December, APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 15th day of December, 2015. APPROVED: Mayor TanAy de Weerd ATTEST: ;LL'DAU CSS ;qfE�T&Ai ;r. `. SEAL, ti pF 1l City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTING MPR COMMISSION PATHWAYS 2016 PRIORITY TASK LIST Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A COMMISSION RESOLUTION - 2016 PATHWAYS PRIORITIES RRSOLUTTON ADOPTTNG MPR COMMTSSTON PATHWAYS 2016 PRTORTTY TASK LTST Page 2 of 2 C ERIDIAN��- >wl p on, A RESOLUTION OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, ESTABLISHING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING PATHWAYS DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES. WHEREAS, the Commission finds that providing opportunities for safe, fun, interconnected foot and bicycle travel is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Meridian; WHEREAS, Meridian City Code section 2-4-2(7) charges the Commission with setting priority to plans, recommendations and suggestions for the future growth and development pathways throughout the city, subject to approval by the mayor and city council; and WHEREAS, the Commission has undertaken site visits to pathways systems throughout the City and has studied the Pathways Master Plan and concluded that by assigning improvement and development priorities as set forth herein, the City can maximize connectivity between pathways and parks within the City of Meridian and capitalize on opportunities to connect large pathway segments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That as soon as resources and/or opportunities become available, the City should undertake the following activities, listed in order of urgency and importance to connectivity: Goal: Secure easements, permits and construct the portion of the proposed Five Mile Creek Pathway Segment H2 that will run between Badley and Fairview Avenues. Purpose: Complete the Five Mile Creek Pathway segment to the north to connect existing neighborhoods and commercial centers building on the success of the Bud Porter Pathway. 2. Goal: Secure easements, permits and construction documents for the first half mile of the Meridian Rail -With -Trail. Actively seek easements and permits needed to extend the pathway beyond the first half mile. Pursue pathway funding opportunities based on these easements. Purpose: Create a major regional pathway connection using the existing railroad right-of-way that connects downtown to the Eagle Road area, Ten Mile area, and beyond to the edge of Meridian's area of Impact east and west. 3. Goal: Secure easements for the Five Mile Creek Pathway from Black Cat Road to Eagle Road. These easements will allow specific funding requests for pathway RESOLUTION OF PARKS & REC. COMMISSION - 2016 PATHWAY PRIORITY TASK LIST PAGE 1 OF 2 projects on an annual basis. The FY16 project encompasses pathway segments D, F, G, H, and I. Utilize the secured easements in segments F, G & H to construct widened sidewalks between existing sections of multi -use pathway in FY16. Purpose: Create a fully connected spine pathway across the City's area of city impact area. 4. Goal: Pursue and secure additional funding sources for future multi -use pathway projects. Purpose: Minimize the impact of multi -use pathway development and construction on City resources. 5. Goal: Develop a comprehensive pathway network informational, directional and interpretive package including signage, distance markings and a parks & pathways guide. Purpose: Provide park and pathway user assistance with point specific information to improve functionality and safety. 6. Goal: Partner with the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) and Meridian Development Corporation (MDC) to foster connection of the Five Mile Creek Pathway to Downtown via Pine Avenue and other roadways. Purpose: Provide pedestrian and bicycle connections between the City's pathway network and the downtown core. 7. Goal: Foster a partnership with the City of Eagle in pursuit of a pathway connection between the future Meridian park property adjacent to the Boise River, Eagle Island Park and the Boise River Greenbelt. Purpose: Provide a pedestrian and bicycle connection to other regional parks and pathways. 8. Goal: Update the Pathway Master Plan annually to reflect new information, completed projects and changing conditions. Purpose: Provide an accurate reference to guide future pathway development opportunities and illustrate current pathway conditions. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 9th day of December, 2015. APPROVED: Matt Stoll, Pr sident Parks and Recreation Commission RESOLUTION OF PARKS & REC. COMMISSION - 2016 PATHWAY PRIORITY TASK LIST PAGE 2 OF 2 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 5J PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Parks and Recreation Master Plan Resolution No. O(p : Resolution Adopting the Parks and Recreation Master Plan MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 15- //() BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ADOPTING THE MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN; AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO FULFILL HIS DUTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MASTER PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it is the mission of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to enhance the Meridian community's quality of life by providing innovatively-designed parks, connected pathways, and diverse recreational opportunities, to create lasting memories for all citizens of Meridian; WHEREAS, in furtherance of this mission, a team of City staff and consultants worked together to prepare and propose the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A, which process included a public input process, services inventory and analysis, needs assessment, operational and maintenance analysis, and financial analysis; WHEREAS, on December 9, 2015, the Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission, pursuant to its authority under Meridian City Code section 2-4-2(10), which charges the Commission with reviewing and commenting on the Parks and Recreation Department's Master Plan, recommended that the Meridian City Council adopt the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as proposed; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council find that it is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Meridian to implement such the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby accepted and adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian. Section 2. That the Director of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is authorized to fulfill his duties as set forth in Title 13, Chapter 2, Meridian City Code, in general accordance with the provisions of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan as adopted by this resolution. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 15th day of December, 2015. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 15th day of December, 2015. F 9 . 911"l ,? A s E PIDIAT',T MayorT y de Weerd SFAL J tr . °f flee i3E �6Ue`,•�'t! RESOLUTION ADOPTING PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN L. Holman, City Cleric PAGE 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT A MERIDIAN PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN RESOLUTION ADOPTING PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN PAGE 2 OF 2 Parks and recreation Master Plan deceMber 2015 Parks and Recreation Master Plan i Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN ......................................................................................................................... 1 B. PLANNING PROCESS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1 C. KEY ISSUES SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 2 D. KEY LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS FINDINGS ....................................................................................... 4 E. RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................. 5 II. INTRODUCTION OF THE PLANNING CONTEXT .................................................................... 11 A. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN ....................................................................................................................... 11 B. HISTORY OF PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT .................................................................................. 11 C. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW .................................................................................... 11 D. MISSION, VISION, AND VALUES ............................................................................................................. 12 E. RELATED PLANNING EFFORTS AND INTEGRATION ....................................................................................... 13 F. METHODOLOGY OF THIS PLANNING PROCESS ............................................................................................ 13 III. WHAT WE WANT – OUR COMMUNITY AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS ........................................ 15 A. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ...................................................................................................................... 15 B. PARK AND RECREATION INFLUENCING TRENDS .......................................................................................... 20 C. COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT .................................................................................................. 22 D. RANDOM INVITATION COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY ............................................................................. 23 E. ORGANIZATIONAL AND MARKETING ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 33 G. RECREATION PROGRAMMING ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 35 H. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 36 I. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 39 IV. WHAT WE HAVE NOW – INVENTORY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ........................... 43 A. INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................................. 43 B. GRASP® METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 44 C. GRASP® ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................. 54 D. OTHER TYPES OF ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................. 65 E. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................... 68 F. PARK CLASSIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 69 G. URBAN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................. 79 H. STRATEGIC GOALS FOR MERIDIAN URBAN FORESTRY ................................................................................. 82 I. EXISTING URBAN FOREST DATA .............................................................................................................. 84 J. PATHWAYS ASSESSMENT & RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................... 90 K. SUMMARY OF PLANNING PROCESS FOR CONCEPTUAL PARK MASTER PLANS ................................................... 97 V. KEY ISSUES ...................................................................................................................... 101 TRIANGULATION MATRIX ....................................................................................................................... 101 VI. GREAT THINGS TO COME – RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLANS .......................... 105 A. RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 105 B. ACTION PLAN, COST ESTIMATES, AND PRIORITIZATION ............................................................................. 111 ii City of Meridian, Idaho APPENDIX A – PARK AND RECREATION INFLUENCING TRENDS ............................................. A‐1 APPENDIX B – COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT ..................................................... A‐27 APPENDIX C – SURVEY RESULTS .......................................................................................... A‐41 APPENDIX D – SAMPLE SPONSORSHIP POLICY .................................................................... A‐97 APPENDIX E – SAMPLE PARTNERSHIP POLICY ................................................................... A‐115 APPENDIX F – GRASP® METHODOLOGY ............................................................................ A‐135 APPENDIX G – LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS MAPS ............................................................ A‐149 APPENDIX H – STRATEGIC GOALS FOR URBAN FORESTRY ................................................. A‐175 APPENDIX I – FUTURE PARK CONCEPT PLANS ................................................................... A‐183 List of Tables Table 1: Summary Demographics for Meridian, Idaho – 2015 ................................................................... 15 Table 2: Meridian Population Projections* ................................................................................................ 15 Table 3: Meridian, Idaho– 2014 Educational Attainment ........................................................................... 18 Table 4: Meridian Housing Statistics ........................................................................................................... 19 Table 5: Outdoor Inventory Summary Table .............................................................................................. 49 Table 6: Indoor Inventory Summary Table ................................................................................................. 51 Table 7: GRASP® Comparative Data ............................................................................................................ 63 Table 8: Capacities LOS for Community Components ................................................................................ 65 Table 9: GRASP® Community Component Index ........................................................................................ 67 Table 10: Key Issues Analysis Matrix ......................................................................................................... 102 Table 11: Water Recreation Participation by Activity (in thousands) ........................................................... 7 Table 12: Top 10 Worldwide Fitness Trends for 2007 and Predicted Trends for 2015 ................................ 8 Table 13: Top Twenty Sports Ranked by Total Participation (in millions) in 2012 ..................................... 18 Table 14: Ten‐Year History of Sports Participation (in millions) 2001‐2011 ............................................... 19 Table 15: Trail Recreation Participation by Activity (in thousands) (6 years of age or older) .................... 22 List of Figures Figure 1: Population Age Distribution for the Years 2010, 2014, and 2019 ............................................... 16 Figure 2: Ethnicity Statistics (2014) ............................................................................................................. 17 Figure 3: Snapshot of Meridian and Idaho unemployment rates from 2006 ‐ 2014 .................................. 18 Figure 4: Annual Household Income Distribution Comparison (2014 ‐ 2019) ............................................ 19 Figure 5: Current Facilities – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix ................................................................ 27 Figure 6: Current Programs – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix ............................................................... 29 Figure 7: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined .................................................. 30 Figure 8: Allocation of Funding Toward Facilities/Services/Programs – Average Allocation Amount ....... 33 Figure 9: Park Acreage ................................................................................................................................ 37 Figure 10: Pathways Maintained ................................................................................................................ 38 Figure 11: Developed Park Acres per 1,000 People ................................................................................... 38 Figure 12: GRASP® Catchment and Scoring Example ................................................................................. 52 Figure 13: GRASP® Scoring Calculation ....................................................................................................... 53 Figure 14: Sample Data Chart Generated in GIS Using Data from Current Tree Inventory ........................ 85 Figure 15: Working Plan of Kleiner Arboretum ........................................................................................... 88 Parks and Recreation Master Plan iii Acknowledgements Mayor & City Council Tammy de Weerd ‐ Mayor Charlie Rountree ‐ City Council President Keith Bird ‐ Vice President Joe Borton Luke Cavener Genesis Milam David Zaremba Parks & Recreation Commission Matt Stoll ‐ President Creg Steele ‐ Vice President Treg Bernt Sharon Borton William Fitzgerald Kent Goldthorpe Jo Greer Phillip Liddell John Nesmith Project Team Steve Siddoway ‐ Parks & Recreation Director Mike Barton ‐ Parks Superintendent Jay Gibbons ‐ Parks & Pathways Project Manager Roger Norberg ‐ Parks Maintenance Foreman Elroy Huff ‐ City Arborist Colin Moss, Garrett White, & Jake Garro ‐ Recreation Coordinators Rachel Myers ‐ Administrative Assistant II Shelly Houston ‐ Marketing Coordinator Doug Green & Matt Tenold ‐ GIS Specialists Brian McClure ‐ Associate City Planner Parks & Recreation Staff Community Stakeholders, Entities, Organizations, Agencies, Commissions, Churches, & Schools; & Department Directors, & Staff that Participated in the Focus Groups Consultant Team GreenPlay, LLC Design Concepts Breckon Land Design RRC Associates For more information about this document, contact GreenPlay, LLC At: 1021 E. South Boulder Road, Suite N, Louisville, Colorado 80027, Telephone: 303‐439‐8369 Email: info@greenplayllc.com www.greenplayllc.com THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Parks and Recreation Master Plan 1 I. Executive Summary A. Purpose of this Plan The City of Meridian, Idaho, provides a comprehensive Parks and Recreation system that greatly contributes to the quality of life in Meridian and surrounding areas. In order to plan into the future of this valuable Parks and Recreation system, the City’s Parks and Recreation Department began a process to develop this Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Development of this plan took place from December 2014 to December 2015, and included a public input process, services inventory and analysis, needs assessment, operational and maintenance analysis, and financial analysis. The Master Plan provides the framework to respond to the evolving needs of this growing community. B. Planning Process Summary This project has been guided by a Meridian Parks and Recreation project team made up of City staff, with input from the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council. This team provided input to the GreenPlay consulting team throughout the planning process. This collaborative effort created a plan that fully utilizes the consultant’s expertise and incorporates the local knowledge and institutional history that only community members can provide. The project consisted of the following tasks: Community Engagement Review of previous planning efforts, City historical information. Extensive community involvement effort including focus groups, meetings with key stakeholders, and a community‐wide public meeting. Statistically‐valid community interest and opinion survey. Online community engagement website – MindMixer/mySidewalk. Facility Inventory Inventory of parks and facilities using existing mapping, staff interviews, and on‐site visits to verify amenities and assess the condition of the facilities and surrounding areas. GRASP® Level of Service Analysis Interviews with staff to provide information about City facilities and services, along with insight regarding the current practices and experiences of the City in serving its residents and visitors. Identification of alternative providers of recreation services to provide insight regarding the market opportunities in the area for potential new facilities and services. Analysis addressing recreation, parks, and related services. 2 City of Meridian, Idaho Assessment and Analysis Review and assessment of relevant plans. Measurement of the current delivery of service for City facilities using the GRASP® Level of Service Analysis and allowing for a target level of service to be determined that is both feasible and aligned with the desires of citizens as expressed through the citizen survey. This analysis is also represented graphically in GRASP® Perspectives. Exploration of finance and funding mechanisms to support development and sustainability within the system. Needs Assessment Consideration of the profile of the community and demographics, including population growth. Research of trends related to Meridian and American lifestyles to help guide the efforts of Parks and Recreation over the next several years. Operational and Marketing Analysis Analyze parks and recreation programming and service delivery. Conduct an organizational Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis. Develop a broad assessment of the overall parks and recreation operations. Recommendations: Goals, Objectives, and Action Plan Identification and categorization of recommendations into themes with goals, objectives, and an action plan for implementation. Development of an action plan for capital improvements including cost, funding source potentials, and timeframe to support the implementation of the plan. Other Plan Elements: Review of current staffing and development of recommendation for future growth potential. Review of the current Park Classification System and development of recommendations for a component based system of classification. Develop an Urban Forestry Management strategy. Review current Pathways Plan and develop updated recommendations. Conduct public engagement meeting to develop draft concept plans for: South Meridian Regional Park (77 acres) Borup/Bottles Properties (47 acres) Margaret Aldape Park (60 acres +/‐) C. Key Issues Summary During the initial stages of the project, the following Key Issues were identified for focus: Organizational: Improve marketing and communication of activities and facilities. Increased staffing for programming and future facilities operations. Increased maintenance staffing to keep up with quality of service and demand. Increase opportunities to utilize technology to improve customer service and efficiencies. Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways. Increase partnerships. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 3 Programs and Service Delivery: Increase year‐round recreational activities. Expand special event offerings. Expand outdoor and adventure recreation opportunities. Need programs at convenient times for community. Expand programming for seniors, active adults, special needs, tweens, and teens. Facilities and Amenities: Maintain existing quantity and quality of level of service. Maintain and improve existing facilities. Find opportunities to acquire new land for parks. Expand pathways and connectivity. Adopt and continue to maintain a component based inventory and level of service standard in existing GIS. Add indoor recreation space. Improve signage agency‐wide. Maintain existing facilities and amenities. Develop new amenities at new and existing parks based on level of service analysis. Add additional athletic fields and lights. Evaluate parking and event/program/activity scheduling. Develop an ADA Transition Plan. Upgrade convenience and customer service items to existing facilitates. Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when developing new ones. Gather and maintain data on HOA and alternative provider owned recreational property. Develop and maintain life cycle replacement and asset management plans. Create park identity in existing and new parks. Finance: Increase event and activity sponsorships. Review Developer Impact fee ordinance. Consider dedicated funding source for parks and recreation. Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities. Consider Cost Recovery and Pricing Philosophy including scholarships. 4 City of Meridian, Idaho D. Key Level of Service (LOS) Analysis Findings Several general findings were revealed by the City of Meridian GRASP® Analysis. These may be summarized as follows: For neighborhood access to parks and recreation, Meridian offers: A wide variety of well distributed recreational opportunities. High quality and well maintained parks. Good access with over 75 percent of land area above threshold when considering all providers. Definite distinction between “Community Parks” and “Neighborhood Parks.” An overall high level of service if accessed by an automobile. High scoring “Regional Parks” or “Community Parks.” A high number of components and average score per site when compared to some other communities. Some large “pockets” of high level of service. Great restroom standards. For walkable level of service: While “Neighborhood Parks” often score high enough to meet the “threshold,” a lack of pathway access often keeps an area below the threshold mark. Some parks, especially “Neighborhood Parks,” lack unique or identifiable character. Alternative providers are an important supplement to Meridian’s “Neighborhood” level of service. There is heavy reliance on alternative providers (including schools) for walkable neighborhood level of service in many areas, and the quality of alternative providers’ parks varies greatly across the system. Demographic analysis shows good distribution of parks where young people live with over 75 percent of the 0‐19 age group having walkable access to some recreation service. There is a need to identify and collect inventory data on the remaining alternative provider parks/facilities. Access to a quality, connected pathway system is limited and greatly impacts overall walkable level of service in Meridian. For pathways and pathway access: There a variety of pathways are available across the City, but they are not meeting the needs and demands of the community. Many of the pathways within Meridian are not connected to the larger overall pathway system. A significant portion of these pathways may have limited or restricted access based on locations within subdivisions. Pathway access is notably absent from some Meridian residential neighborhoods. Based on projected population growth over the next 5‐7 years, Meridian and its partners need: Additional park land and components added to the system to maintain current level of service. To improve or upgrade existing components to maintain current level of service. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 5 E. Recommendations After analyzing the Findings that resulted from this process, including the Key Issues Matrix, a summary of all research, the qualitative and quantitative data, the GRASP® LOS analyses, and input assembled for this study, a variety of recommendations have emerged to provide guidance in consideration of how to improve parks, recreation, and pathway opportunities in the City of Meridian. This section describes ways to enhance the level of service and the quality of life with improvement through organizational efficiencies, financial opportunities, improved programming and service delivery, and maintenance and improvements to facilities and amenities. Goal 1: Continue to Improve Organizational Efficiencies Objective 1.1 – Maintain existing level of service goal The City of Meridian currently has a Level of Service that is three acres of developed park land per 1,000 persons with a goal of increasing to a Level of Service Standard of four acres/1,000 persons by 2040. Additionally, the City should develop a Level of Service Standard that considers components within parks and a radius of .5 miles per component for walkability. Objective 1.2 – Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department activities and services. The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to implement the Marketing Plan (Communication Plan) that will guide the Department’s efforts in communicating and promoting its activities, services, and facilities. This will continue to create great awareness and should include all of the recommendations in the Master Plan for programs, services, and facility upgrades. Additionally, the Marketing Plan should be reviewed annually and updated as needed, and should include marketing strategies that incorporate the efforts of partner departments and projects. The marketing and communication of Parks and Recreation Department activities should be enhanced with a focused effort on adopting open lines of communication and meetings with partners and potential partners within the community. This enhanced focus will help to create advocacy in the community and provide a forum to better celebrate the successes of the Department. Objective 1.3 – Provide improved signage agency‐wide to make it easier for patrons to find and use parks, facilities, and pathways. The Parks and Recreation Department should evaluate directional and wayfinding signage to facilities on roadway, pathways, and within parks. Additionally, the Department should develop signage standards for parks and update existing park signs as parks are renovated to meet the new standard. Improved wayfinding signage will contribute to a greater connectivity of parks, facilities, and pathways. Objective 1.4 – Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities. There was an overwhelming public response to make sure that Parks and Recreation maintains and improves existing facilities. The Department should continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities and amenities as well as address low scoring components through the CIP Plan and the Life Cycle Maintenance Program. 6 City of Meridian, Idaho Objective 1.5 – Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways. Mobile marketing is a trend of the future. Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much higher rates than adults in age brackets 30 and older. Usage rates of mobile applications demonstrate that chronologically across four major age cohorts, Millennials tend to get information more frequently using mobile devices, such as smart phones. Parks and Recreation should explore additional social media uses and navigation apps for parks and pathways. The City of Meridian has current best practices for social media that should be followed, reviewed annually, and updated as needed. Objective 1.6 – Increase appropriate partnerships within the community. The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department currently partners with a number of agencies to provide programs and activities to the community. The Department should continue to explore additional opportunities, as well as build on their existing partnerships. Where not already in place, the Department should ensure that all existing and future partnerships are accurately portrayed in a signed partnership agreement (Sample Partnership Policy can be found in Appendix E). The City of Meridian Strategic Plan that was adopted in 2015 sets a goal of continuing to explore partnerships with alternative providers to increase level of service. Additionally, the Department should identify desired sports facilities or complexes and establish partnerships that foster their development. Objective 1.7 – Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies. The Department should continue to explore additional opportunities to expand the use of technology Department wide. Some immediate areas in which area to increase technology within the Department include providing online shelter reservations and providing a mobile application of the Department’s website. Objective 1.8 – Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service. As recommendations in the Master Plan for programs, services, new facilities, pathways, parks, and facility upgrades are implemented, it is important to maintain staffing levels to maintain current performance standards. This will require the new positions both in parks and recreation. Objective 1.9 – Maintain and keep current the Department Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Policies. The Parks and Recreation Department is governed by City Code and internal standards of operations and policies. The Department should review the City Code Chapter for Parks and Recreation annually and recommend updates as needed. Additionally, staff should review Department SOPs and policies annually and update as needed. Objective 1.10 – Expand the volunteer program The Department currently has a Park Ambassador Program that could be reviewed, improved, and expanded to meet their growing needs. Additionally, they should continue to make use of other volunteer opportunities for park projects and events. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 7 Goal 2: Increase Financial Opportunities Objective 2.1 – Increase special event and activities sponsorships. The Department should continue to explore additional sponsorship opportunities and build on existing sponsorships. All existing and future sponsorships should be evaluated to ensure that they are accurately portrayed in a signed sponsorship agreement (Sample Sponsorship Policy can be found in Appendix D). Objective 2.2 – Evaluate Developer Impact Fee Ordinance. The current Developer Impact Fee is based on a LOS of 3.04 acres of developed park land per 1,000 people. As the Department moves toward its goal of four acres of developed park land per 1,000 people, the ordinance should be reviewed every three years to keep current with the LOS. Additionally, the Department should review its Developer Impact Fee revenue annually to align with CIP requests and existing LOS. Objective 2.3 – Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities. The Department currently takes advantage of grant opportunities available for programming, services, and facility improvements. The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to pursue any and all grant opportunities at the federal, state, regional, and local levels. To accomplish this, the Department may consider contracting with a dedicated grant writer to research, submit, and track such grants. Objective 2.4 –Implement a cost recovery and pricing policy. The Department currently has a practice of cost recovery, but it varies based on the different service areas. The Parks and Recreation Department should implement a Cost Recovery Policy, such as the Pyramid Pricing Methodology to determine a consistent method of pricing Parks and Recreation activities throughout the Department. As part of the policy, the Department should continue to support the current Care Enough to Share Scholarship Program. In addition to establishing a Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy, the Department should explore the feasibility of a dedicated revenue for parks and recreation through special revenue funds, sports, tourism, or other available sources. Goal 3: Continue to Improve Programs and Service Delivery Objective 3.1 – Increase year round recreational programming and activities. The Department should continue to look for opportunities to expand indoor recreational programs and activities. The community would like to see additional programs for tweens, teens, people with special needs, and seniors. As new programs are developed, continue to monitor recreational trends to stay current with programming and demand. As popularity in program offerings and activities increases, continue to look for opportunities to expand programs around working hours and commuting citizens schedules. 8 City of Meridian, Idaho The City’s Strategic Plan has also set a goal to attract, promote, and maintain a “signature” event for the City, and to set targets, identify gaps, and deploy programs, activities, and events that provide family‐ centered recreational opportunities. Goal 4: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities Objective 4.1 – Maintain and improve existing facilities. The Department should continue to implement existing plans, the CIP, Life Cycle Replacement Programs, and the Master Plan. These plans should be reviewed annually and updated as needed. Objective 4.2 – Expand pathways and connectivity. The Department should continue to implement the existing Pathways Master Plan and update as needed based on annual reviews. As new and existing pathways are designed and renovated, the Department should consider adding fitness stations and family fun stations in appropriate locations along the pathways. Objective 4.3 – Add indoor recreation space. Based on feedback from focus group participants and the survey results, there is a need for additional indoor recreation space. The Department should continue to explore opportunities to add additional indoor recreation space either through partnerships, purchase of an existing facility, or construction of a Community Center or Fieldhouse. Another option would be to explore opportunities to add Community Centers to newly planned elementary schools. Objective 4.4 – Develop new amenities at existing parks based on level of service analysis. Demand for usage of Meridian parks and athletic facilities continue to grow, and the Department should look for opportunities to add new amenities to enhance the experience for users. As Meridian continues to grow, the Department should look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in those new growth areas. Also, based on the GRASP® analysis, the Department should look for opportunities to add new components at existing parks where the level of service is below threshold. Objective 4.5 – Acquire new land for parks. Based on population growth and a LOS goal of reaching four acres of developed park land per 1,000 population, the Department needs to continue to find and purchase additional land for future park development. When considering new parks, priority should be given to areas where LOS is below threshold. Objective 4.6 – Improve parking at parks. Parking was an issue that was identified at most of the focus groups. The Department should continue to monitor parking during peak usage times and explore the need to improve and potentially add more parking at appropriate parks and amenities. Another consideration would be to explore alternative transportation options to reduce parking demand. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 9 Objective 4.7 – Continue to improve ADA accessibility at all facilities. According to the ADA.gov website, “Access to civic life by people with disabilities is a fundamental goal of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). To ensure that this goal is met, Title II of the ADA requires State and local governments to make their programs and services accessible to persons with disabilities… One important way to ensure that Title II's requirements are being met in cities of all sizes is through self‐ evaluation, which is required by the ADA regulations. Self‐evaluation enables local governments to pinpoint the facilities, programs, and services that must be modified or relocated to ensure that local governments are complying with the ADA.” Parks and Recreation currently does not have an ADA Accessibility Transition Plan which identifies needed changes during a self‐evaluation process. The Department needs to conduct a self‐evaluation and develop a comprehensive transition plan. Once the ADA Transition Plan is developed and adopted, it should be updated at least every five years. Objective 4.8 – Upgrade comfort, convenience, and cultural amenities to existing facilities. As the Department is making upgrades to and improving existing facilities, it should explore opportunities to add shade, storage, security lighting, synthetic turf, and other amenities appropriately at existing facilities. Working with the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Department should seek opportunities to create individual identities for each Neighborhood Park. Where appropriate, look for opportunities to add public art to new and existing facilities. Objective 4.9 – Add destination park amenities. As citizen interest grows, and demand for new and different amenities at parks are identified, the Department should explore opportunities to add destination playgrounds and natural play areas at existing parks. The newly adopted Strategic Plan also has a goal to foster development of Discovery Parks that uniquely blend arts, entertainment, and culture. Objective 4.10 – Address current and future needs for athletic fields. As demand warrants, explore opportunities to add rectangle and diamond fields as usage increases. To help increase field time, add sports field lighting to new facilities and improvements to lighting at existing facilities where appropriate. Additionally, the Department should consider upgrading to or adding synthetic turf fields as use and demand increases. Objective 4.11 – Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when developing new parks. Continue to evaluate the programming needs of the community when developing new parks or when adding new components to existing parks. Objective 4.12 – Monitor use, demands, and trends of recreation components. Through the use of dashboards and other reporting and tracking tools, continue to monitor and evaluate the use, demands, and trends in recreation amenities. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Parks and Recreation Master Plan 11 II. Introduction of the Planning Context A. Purpose of this Plan The City of Meridian, Idaho, provides a comprehensive Parks and Recreation system that greatly contributes to the quality of life in Meridian and surrounding areas. In order to plan into the future of this valuable Parks and Recreation system, the City’s Parks and Recreation Department began a process to develop this Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Development of this plan took place from December 2014 to December 2015, and included a public input process, services inventory and analysis, needs assessment, operational and maintenance analysis, and financial analysis. The Master Plan provides the framework to respond to the evolving needs of this growing community. B. History of Parks and Recreation Department Since the 1980s, there have been only two developed City of Meridian parks in existence—Storey Park (Previously known as “City Park” until 1980) and 8th Street Park. The Parks Division operated under the Department of Public Works until 1998 when the City created a separate Parks and Recreation Department. In January of 1998, Meridian hired its first Parks and Recreation Director, Tom Kuntz, who served in that position until 2002. Also in 1998, the Parks and Recreation Commission was formed, and the Department produced its first Activity Guide. Since 1998 there have been three Directors, Tom Kuntz (1998 to 2002), Douglas Strong (2003 to 2007), and Steve Siddoway (2008 to present). The Department continues to grow and provide facilities, programs, and services to the citizens of Meridian. C. Parks and Recreation Department Overview Parks and Recreation is responsible for maintaining public open spaces and for providing a quality system of parks and recreation facilities and positive leisure opportunities available to all persons in the community. The Department is also responsible for the development and maintenance of the pathways system and the urban forest. The Meridian Parks and Recreation system consists of 387 acres of parkland, 255 acres of developed parks and 132 acres of undeveloped land. The system is made up of 19 parks (not including Lakeview Golf Course): three undeveloped sites, just less than 22 miles of pathways, and 13 miles of micro pathways, a senior center, and a community center. Additionally, Parks and Recreation offers a variety of recreational programs, adult sports leagues, and special events, and handles shelter/field reservations and temporary use permits. 12 City of Meridian, Idaho D. Mission, Vision, and Values As part of the Master Planning process, GreenPlay held a series of Mission, Vision, and Values (MVV) work sessions with the Parks and Recreation staff. The purpose was to review the current MVV, validate its purpose with staff, and align with the newly adopted MVV for the City that was developed as part of the 2015 Strategic Plan. The MVV is what directs the departments and their employees daily. The vision addresses how the Department will do its part to make Meridian, “A premier community in which to live, work, and raise a family,” as well as fulfilling the City’s Vision that “Community members will enjoy a … myriad of diverse arts, cultural, and recreational offerings to have meaningful experiences.” Furthermore, the Department’s focus areas are what guide its employees specifically as well as the overall CARE values of the City. Meridian Parks & Recreation staff know and strive to champion Customer service, Accountability, Respect, and Excellence, but they also practice Quality, Community, and Fun daily. The results of the work sessions produced the current Mission, Vision, and Values. Mission: The Meridian Parks and Recreation Department’s mission is to enhance our community’s quality of life by providing innovatively‐designed parks, connected pathways, and diverse recreational opportunities for all citizens of Meridian that create lasting memories. Vision: Meridian Parks and Recreation is a premier department that provides family‐focused opportunities for the Meridian community and responds to a growing and changing population. Focus Areas: Quality, Community, Fun Quality: We provide quality parks, pathways, and recreational opportunities that are beautifully designed, exceptionally maintained, safe, and create memories for the citizens and visitors to Meridian. Community: We build the sense of community in Meridian by connecting people through parks, pathways, programs, and events that bring enjoyment to individuals and families of all ages and abilities. Fun: We provide places and opportunities that create quality of life experiences, bring balance to working individuals and families, and are fun and enjoyable. At the end of the day, this is what it’s all about! Parks and Recreation Master Plan 13 E. Related Planning Efforts and Integration As part of the master planning process, GreenPlay evaluated and utilized information from recent past and/or current planning work. The consultant team consolidated relevant information from these planning documents, inventory maps, budgets, work plans, and funding plans utilized by the Parks and Recreation Department to facilitate the comprehensive coordination of direction and recommendations. Documents included: City of Meridian Strategic Plan (2015) 2003 Parks & Recreation Action Plan City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan (2011) Pathways Master Plan Impact Fees Study Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan (ACHD) ACHD Roadways to Bikeways Plan City of Meridian Existing Conditions Report Ten Mile Specific Area Plan Future Land Use Map F. Methodology of this Planning Process This project has been guided by a Meridian Parks and Recreation project team made up of City staff, with input from the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council. This team provided input to the GreenPlay consulting team throughout the planning process. This collaborative effort created a plan that fully utilizes the consultant’s expertise and incorporates the local knowledge and institutional history that only community members can provide. The project consisted of the following tasks: Community Engagement Facility Inventory GRASP® Level of Service Analysis Needs Assessment Operational and Marketing Analysis Recommendations: Goals, Objectives, and Action Plan THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Parks and Recreation Master Plan 15 III. What We Want – Our Community and Identified Needs A. Demographic Profile Understanding community demographics is an important component of preparing a Parks and Recreation Master Plan. This chapter provides a demographic overview of the City of Meridian, Idaho. The population data used in this demographic profile comes from ESRI Business Information Solutions, based on the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census data and COMPASS to best represent the current profile. Table 1: Summary Demographics for Meridian, Idaho – 2015 Summary Demographics Population 91,311 Number of Households 31,555 Avg. Household Size 2.96 Median Age 33.58 Median Household Income $59,969 Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions Demographic Analysis Population Projections Although the future of population growth cannot be predicted with certainty, it is helpful to make assumptions about it for planning purposes. Table 2 contains population estimates and projections for City of Meridian in the years 2015, 2020, and 2025, based on the 2010 U.S. Census. The annual growth rate for the city from 2000 through 2010 was 6.16 percent. COMPASS’ projected annual growth rate for the City for 2015 through 2025 is 1.9 percent, compared to a projected 2015‐2025 annual growth rate of 1.0 percent for the State of Idaho of and 0.73 percent for the United States as a whole. Table 2: Meridian Population Projections* US Census (2000 and 2010 ) and COMPASS Projections 2000 Population 41,315 2010 Population 82,250 2015 Estimated 91,311 2020 Projected 108,701 2025 Projected 118,600 Source: COMPASS 16 City of Meridian, Idaho Figure 1: Meridian Population Growth Trend Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions. GreenPlay, LLC, calculated projected populations for 2024 based on ESRI growth multiplier of 1.75% for Meridian. Population Age Distribution A comparison of the estimated population break down by age for Meridian from 2010 to 2019 is shown in Figure 1. The gender distribution in 2014 was 49 percent male to 51 percent female. The median age in 2014 was 33.5. The U.S. census indicates that in 2010, the median age for the Caucasian population of Meridian was 33.1. By contrast, the median age for those who self‐identified as being of Hispanic Origin (irrespective of race) was 21.7. Hispanic Origin was the most significant minority ethnic/racial identifier in the Meridian population (at 6.8 percent) in 2010. Figure 2: Population Age Distribution for the Years 2010, 2014, and 2019 Source: 2010 U.S. Census; 2014 estimates and 2019 forecast provided by ESRI Business Information Solutions. 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 2000 2010 2014 2019 2024 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 0 - 4 5 - 9 10 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75 - 84 85+ 2010 2014 2019 Parks and Recreation Master Plan 17 The age demographics have undergone a number of changes in Meridian from 2010 to 2014 with these trends generally predicted to continue through 2019. The 25‐44 age range is predicted to drop by three percent to 27.5 percent from 2010 to 2019, while the 55‐74 age range is predicted to grow by 2.9 percent to represent 16.5 percent of the population in 2019. Race/Ethnicity Figure 2 reflects the racial/ethnic population distribution for Meridian. Ninety‐one percent (91%) percent of the population was Caucasian in 2014, with the Asian population at two percent, African American at .8 percent, and Native American at .5 percent of the population. Those identifying as two or more races represented 3.1 percent of the population. Additionally, the population of Hispanic origin (a separate look at the population, irrespective of race) was at 7.5 percent in 2014. The Caucasian population is trending slightly downward from 92 percent in 2010 to a predicted 90 percent in 2019. Meridian’s Asian population is trending upward slightly from 1.8 percent in 2010 to a predicted 2.4 percent in 2019. The population of Hispanic origin (irrespective of race), at 6.8 percent in 2010, is expected to grow to 8.8 percent of the population by 2019. Figure 3: Ethnicity Statistics (2014) Source: 2010 U.S. Census; 2014 estimates and 2019 forecast provided by ESRI Business Information Solutions. Hispanic origin can be viewed as the heritage, nationality, lineage, or country of birth of the person or the person’s parents or ancestors before arriving in the United States. In the U.S. census, people who identify as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be any race and are included in all of the race categories. Figure 3 represents Hispanic Origin as recorded in the U.S. Census. 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Caucasian Alone African American Alone Native American Alone Asian Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 2010 2014 2019 18 City of Meridian, Idaho Educational Attainment As shown in Table 3, the highest ranking educational cohorts in Meridian are those residents with some college, no degree (29%) and those with a bachelor’s degree (23.8%). High school graduates follow, comprising 18.8 percent of the population. According to a census study, education levels had more effect on earnings over a 40‐year span in the workforce than any other demographic factor, such as gender, race, and ethnic origin.1 Table 3: Meridian, Idaho– 2014 Educational Attainment Education Attainment Service Area Percentage Less than 9th grade 1.4% 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 4.9% High school graduate (includes equivalency) 18.8% GED/Alternative Credential 3.4% Some college, no degree 29.0% Associate’s degree 9.4% Bachelor’s degree 23.8% Graduate or professional degree 9.5% Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions 2014 estimate based on the 2010 U.S. Census. Employment Figure 3 provides a snapshot of the unemployment rate from December 2006 through December 2014 for the City of Meridian and the State of Idaho as a whole. The unemployment rate for both Meridian and Idaho in December 2014 was under four percent (3.4 percent for Meridian and 3.7 percent for the State of Idaho). Figure 4: Snapshot of Meridian and Idaho unemployment rates from 2006 ‐ 2014 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics 1 Tiffany Julian and Robert Kominski, “Education and Synthetic Work‐Life Earnings Estimates” American Community Survey Reports, US Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acs‐14.pdf, September 2011. 1.4% 5.8% 7.7% 5.3% 3.4% 2.7% 6.2% 8.8% 6.9% 3.7% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% Dec. 2006 Dec. 2008 Dec. 2010 Dec.2012 Dec.2014 Meridian Idaho Parks and Recreation Master Plan 19 Household Information As reflected in Table 4, in 2014, Meridian had 26,674 housing units with a 72.9 percent owner‐occupied housing rate, compared to 22 percent renter occupied rate. The owner‐occupied housing rate dropped more than seven percent between 2000 and 2010, but has remained steady since 2010, and is predicted to rise slightly to 73.9 percent in 2019. The average household size in 2014 was 2.96. Table 4: Meridian Housing Statistics Source: 2010 U.S. Census; 2014 estimates and 2019 forecasts provided by ESRI Business Information Solutions. Household Income The estimated 2014 median household income for residents of Meridian was $59,969 and is expected to grow to $69,355 by 2019. Figure 4 illustrates the full income distribution estimated for Meridian in 2014 and projected for 2019. In 2014, most residents had an income in the $50,000 – $74,999 income range (22.4%), followed by the $75,000 – $99,999 income range (17.5%), and the $100,000 – $149,000 income range (13.5%). Income distribution in the $75,000 – $99,999 and $100,000 – $149,000 ranges is expected to rise by 2.6 percent and 3.4 percent, respectively, from 2014 to 2019. Figure 5: Annual Household Income Distribution Comparison (2014 ‐ 2019) Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions, 2014. 2000 2010 2014 2019 Total housing units 14,431 26,674 28,943 31,304 Percent owner occupied 80.8% 72.9% 72.9% 73.9% Percent renter occupied 15.4% 22.0% 23.4% 23.3% Percent vacant 3.8% 5.1% 3.7% 2.8% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 2014 2019 20 City of Meridian, Idaho Health Ranking The United Health Foundation has ranked Idaho 18th in its State Health Rankings in 2014, down from 12th in 2013 (americashealthrankings.org/id). The State’s biggest strengths include: Low incidence of infectious disease High per capita public health funding Low rate of preventable hospitalizations Some of the challenges the State faces include: High levels of air pollution Low immunization coverage among teens Limited availability of primary care physicians In the 2014 Idaho County Health Rankings (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, countyhealthrankings.org), Ada County ranked 6th out of 42 counties for health outcomes and 2nd for health factors. As explained in the health ranking report, “Health outcomes represent how healthy a county is while health factors represent what influences the health of the county.”2 B. Park and Recreation Influencing Trends It is a challenge and an opportunity for parks and recreation providing agencies to continue to understand and respond to the changing recreation interests of serviced populations. In this fast‐paced society, it is important to stay on top of current trends. The following highlights relevant local, regional, and national recreation trends relative to the Meridian demographic and identified interests. More detail is found in Appendix A. Demographic Trends Millennials lead structured lives filled with rules and regulations. Less accustomed to unstructured play than previous generations and apprehensive of the outdoors, they spend most of their time indoors, leaving home primarily to socialize with friends and families. With an upbeat and a can‐do attitude, this generation is more optimistic and tech‐savvy than its elders. With their varied life experiences, values, and expectations, Baby Boomers are predicted to redefine the meaning of recreation and leisure programming for mature adults. Boomers are second only to Gen Y/Millennials (born between 1980 and 1999) in participation in fitness and outdoor sports. Boomers will reinvent what being a 65‐year‐old means. Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much higher rates than adults in age brackets 30 and older. Facility Trends Design of a community’s infrastructure is directly linked to physical activity – where environments are built with bicyclists and pedestrians in mind, more people bike and walk. Higher levels of bicycling and walking also coincide with increased bicycle and pedestrian safety and higher levels of physical activity. Increasing bicycling and walking make a big impact on improving public health and life expectancy. 2 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, “County Health Rankings and Roadmaps: 2014 Rankings – Idaho,” http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/idaho/2014/rankings/ada/county/outcomes/overall/snapshot accessed on February 18, 2015. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 21 For the second year, dog parks were the top planned addition to parks and recreational facilities in the country in 2013. Dog parks can be as simple as a gated area, or more elaborate with “designed‐for‐dogs” amenities like water fountains, agility equipment, and pet wash stations, to name a few. Communities around the country are considering adding shade structures, as well as shade trees to their parks, playgrounds, and pools as “a weapon against cancer and against childhood obesity.” The fact that a connected system of pathways increases the level of physical activity in a community has been scientifically demonstrated through the Pathways for Health initiative of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Pathways can provide a wide variety of opportunities for being physically active. Park and recreation agencies have begun installing “outdoor gyms,” with equipment comparable to what would be found in an indoor workout facility, such as leg and chest presses, elliptical trainers, pull down trainers, etc. Such equipment can increase the usage of parks, pathways, and other outdoor amenities while helping to fight the obesity epidemic and increase the community’s interaction with nature. There is an increasing trend toward indoor leisure and therapeutic pools. Additional amenities, such as “splash pads,” are popular as well. Programming Trends Figures from the Association for Interpretative Naturalists demonstrate that nature‐based programs are on the rise. The growth of these programs is thought to come from replacing grandparents as the teacher about the “great outdoors.” It is also speculated that a return to natural roots and renewed interest in life’s basic elements was spurred as a response to September 11, 2001. Participation in walking for pleasure and family gatherings outdoors were the two most popular activities for the U.S. population as a whole as reported in a 2012 report. These outdoor activities were followed closely in popularity by viewing/photographing wildlife, boating, fishing, snow/ice activities, and swimming. There has been a growing momentum in participation in sightseeing, birding, and wildlife watching in recent years. Some of the top ten athletic activities ranked by total participation include: exercise walking, swimming, exercising with equipment, camping, and bicycle riding. A national trend in the delivery of parks and recreation systems reflects more partnerships and contractual agreements reaching out to the edges of the community to support specialized services. The majority of Americans agree that preserving undeveloped land for outdoor recreation is important. A large percentage of outdoor participants also believe that developing local parks and hiking and walking pathways is important and that there should be more outdoor education and activities during the school day. 22 City of Meridian, Idaho Funding Trends According to Recreation Management magazine’s “2013 State of the Industry Report,” survey respondents from parks and recreation departments/districts reporting about their revenues from 2009 through 2014 reveals the impact of the recession, as well as the beginning of a recovery. More than 25 percent of respondents saw their revenues decrease from 2009 to 2010, and 21.8 percent of respondents reported a further decrease in 2011. Forty‐four percent (44%) of park and recreation respondents reported increases from 2011 to 2012. C. Community and Stakeholder Input Public process for the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan was held January 26 – 28, 2015 and consisted of 125 participants in eight focus groups, eight stakeholder interviews, and a public forum. This section summarizes the key issues and input that was gathered from the meetings. A full summary of all public input can be found in Appendix B. The community input summary is categorized below with brief details from the many focus group meetings. Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement The residents of Meridian benefit from a good geographic distribution of parks throughout the City, with some pockets of underserved areas. Participants embrace the fact that their parks form the heart of the community and feel like the programs offered are well run, diverse, affordable, and operated by dedicated employees, and as such, indicate that they feel the quality of programs currently offered are very good. Participants also recognized that the parks are well maintained and have unique and innovative features. When asked about areas for improvement, participants identified the disconnected pathway system, the need for a larger indoor recreation facility, and the need to keep up with the city’s rapid growth as top priorities. Other general items, such as a perceived lack of parking, shade, field space for non‐traditional sports, and off‐leash dog areas were all identified as opportunities for improvement. Along with physical improvements, improvement of communication, and availability of information is also important to users. Satisfaction Residents are very satisfied with the programs, the quality of existing infrastructure, and maintenance. They also rated customer service and seeking community feedback as very good. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 23 Programming and Activities, and Locations Meridian residents love their programs and activities. They are very satisfied but do have an apparent demand for more year‐round program offerings. Included among the additional programs are more offerings for seniors and teens, special events, performing arts, outdoor recreation and adventure programs, non‐sports activities, and adaptive recreation. Two areas of the community were identified as being underserved, and may benefit from future park development. These were South and West Meridian. Certain demographics may also be underserved, including seniors and teens, as well as active adults and Millennials. New Facilities When asked for suggestions of new parks and recreation facilities in the City, participants identified: Pathway connectivity Fieldhouse/gym space Parks in South and West Meridian Additional athletic fields Large community center Exercise stations Performing Arts Center Iconic/Destination Parks Values City of Meridian residents value their parks and recreation system and feel like they get very good service from staff. Participants’ number one value was family‐oriented programming and activities. They also want good communication about happenings and program offerings. Quality and affordable programming is a priority, while ensuring access to diverse offerings throughout the entire city. Providing a balance between passive and active recreation, as well as organized sports and unstructured activities, is very important to the community. D. Random Invitation Community Survey Summary Introduction and Methodology The purpose of this study was to gather public feedback on City of Meridian parks and recreation facilities, services, and programs. This survey research effort and subsequent analysis were designed to assist the City of Meridian in the creation of a master plan for existing and possible future enhancements, facilities, and services. The survey was conducted using three primary methods: 1) a mail‐back survey, 2) an online, invitation‐ only web survey to further encourage response from those residents already within the defined invitation sample, and 3) an open‐link online survey for members of the public who were not part of the invitation sample. The analysis primarily focuses on responses from the invitation sample. However, open link responses are additionally analyzed and discussed, particularly when they differ from the invitation sample. 24 City of Meridian, Idaho A total of 3,500 surveys were mailed to a random sample of Meridian residents in March 2015. The final sample size for this statistically valid survey was 731, resulting in a margin of error of approximately +/‐ 3.6 percentage points calculated for questions at 50 percent response.3 The open link survey received an additional 661 responses. The underlying data were weighted by age, ethnicity, and area of impact by neighborhood to ensure appropriate representation of Meridian residents across different demographic cohorts in the sample. Using the ESRI Demographic and Income Profile, which generates a 2014 population profile using 2010 Census data, the age distribution and ethnicity distribution within the respondent sample was matched to the 2014 demographic profile of the City of Meridian. In addition, the neighborhood distribution within the respondent sample was matched to the 2015 area of impact by region as provided by the City. Current Facilities and Programs Importance of Local Recreation Opportunities. Respondents were asked to indicate the importance of the availability of local parks and recreation opportunities to their household on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 meaning “not at all important” and 5 meaning “very important.” Respondents generally indicated that local recreation opportunities are very important to their household, with 84 percent of invitation respondents and 91 percent of open link respondents providing a 4 or 5 rating. Average importance ratings were similarly high in both the invitation (4.2) and open link (4.5) samples. Knowledge/Familiarity with Current Meridian Parks and Recreation Offerings. Respondents were also asked to rate their level of familiarity with current Meridian parks and recreation facilities, programs, and services on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means “not at all familiar” and 5 means “very familiar.” Ratings of familiarity were not as high as ratings of importance, particularly among invitation respondents. Forty‐three percent (43%) of invitation respondents provided a 4 or 5 rating (average rating 3.4), compared to 70 percent of open link respondents (average 3.8). Participation in Meridian Parks and Recreation Classes and Programs. Nineteen percent (19%) of invitation respondents and 34 percent of open link respondents indicated that they have registered for a Department program or class during the past year. Ratings of Service Received. Respondents who indicated that they had registered for classes or programs in the past year were asked to rate the service they received on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 meaning “poor” and 5 meaning “excellent.” Satisfaction with their program or class was very high, with 95 percent of invitation respondents and 91 percent of open link respondents providing a 4 or 5 rating and an average satisfaction rating of 4.4 for both samples. Most Used Facilities and Parks. Respondents were provided a list of 18 facilities and parks operated by the City of Meridian. They were then prompted to indicate the three facilities they use most often. 3For the total invitation sample size of 731, margin of error is +/‐ 3.6 percent calculated for questions at 50% response (if the response for a particular question is “50%”—the standard way to generalize margin of error is to state the larger margin, which occurs for responses at 50%). Note that the margin of error is different for every single question response on the survey depending on the resultant sample sizes, proportion of responses, and number of answer categories for each question. Comparison of differences in the data between various segments, therefore, should take into consideration these factors. As a General comment, it is sometimes more appropriate to focus attention on the general trends and patterns in the data rather than on the individual percentages. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 25 Use by Sample. Figure 5, in the following section, explores the top three most used facilities and parks by survey sample. The following facilities were used most commonly by invitation respondents: Settlers Park (70%), Storey Park (53%), Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park (46%), Tully Park (39%), and Bear Creek Park (17%). Open link respondents also most frequently used Settlers Park (80%), followed by Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park (58%), Tully Park (28%), Storey Park (26%), and Bear Creek Park (17%). Invitation respondents are more likely to use Storey Park and Tully Park on a regular basis, while open link respondents have a higher likelihood of utilizing Settlers Park, Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park, Heroes Park, and the Heritage Middle School Ball Fields. Importance of Facilities to Household. On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is “not at all important” and 5 is “very important,” respondents rated the importance of Meridian Parks and Recreation facilities to their households. Figure 5 to follow illustrates the percentage of “4” and “5” responses (indicating that the respondent feels the facility is important) versus the percentage of “1” and “2” responses (indicating that the respondent feels the facility is not important) among invitation respondents. Figure 5 depicts the average importance rating provided by invitation respondents for each facility. The highest average ratings and largest shares of “4” and “5” responses were given for the following facilities: Pathways (average rating 4.2; 82% rated a 4 or 5) Playgrounds (4.1 average; 77% rated 4 or 5) Picnic shelters (3.8 average; 69% rated 4 or 5) Swimming pools/aquatic facilities (3.7 average; 56% rated 4 or 5) Community/recreation center (3.6 average; 56% rated 4 or 5) Indoor gym space (3.3 average; 49% rated 4 or 5) Splash pads (3.3 average; 48% rated 4 or 5) Athletic fields (3.3 average; 43% rated 4 or 5) Outdoor basketball courts (3.1 average; 43% rated 4 or 5) Importance vs. Needs‐Met Matrix – Current Facilities. It is informative to plot and compare the facility scores for level of importance and degree to which needs are being met by these facilities using an “Importance vs. Needs‐Met” matrix. Scores are displayed in this matrix using the mid‐points for both questions to divide into four quadrants. The Importance scale midpoint was 3.3 (the median importance rating across all facilities); the Needs‐Met midpoint was 3.4 (see Figure 5). The upper right quadrant shows the facilities that have a high average rating of importance as well as a high level of needs being met. These amenities are less of a priority for improvement since needs are currently being met, but are important to maintain in the future as they are perceived to be important by respondents: Playgrounds Picnic shelters Splash pads (on the cusp of low importance) 26 City of Meridian, Idaho Facilities located in the upper left quadrant have relatively high importance but a lower level of needs being met, which suggests that these facilities could be improved. Improving these facilities would positively impact the degree to which household needs are being met overall: Pathways Swimming pools/aquatic facilities Community/recreation center Indoor gym space (on the cusp of low importance) The lower right quadrant shows facilities that are not important to many households, yet are meeting their needs very well. It may be beneficial in the future to evaluate the parks and recreation resources supporting these facilities: Athletic fields Outdoor basketball courts Ball fields Finally, facilities in the lower left quadrant are not meeting needs adequately; however, they are important to a smaller group of community members. These “niche” facilities may have a small but passionate following; therefore, there may be merit in measuring participation and planning for future improvements accordingly: Tennis courts Dog parks Rodeo grounds Parks and Recreation Master Plan 27 Figure 6: Current Facilities – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix Invitation Sample Only 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 How Well Needs Are Currently Being Met (Average Rating) 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Splash Pads Rodeo Grounds Picnic Shelters Outdoor Basketball Courts Community/Rec. Center Ball Fields Athletic Fields Tennis Courts Playgrounds Pathways/Trails Indoor Gym Space Dog Parks Fac Imp Fac Needs High Importance/ Low Needs Met High Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ Low Needs Met Level of Importance vs. Needs Met for Current MPRD Facilities -Invitation Sample Only 28 City of Meridian, Idaho Importance of Programs to Household. Similarly, on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is “not at all important” and 5 is “very important,” respondents rated the importance of Meridian Parks and Recreation programs to their households. The programs that received the highest average ratings and greatest proportion of “4” and “5” ratings from invitation respondents include: Youth sports (average rating 3.7; 64% provided a 4 or 5 rating) Family programs (3.7 average; 69% rated 4 or 5) Outdoor adventure programs (3.5 average; 50% rated 4 or 5) Youth programs (3.5 average; 57% rated 4 or 5) Senior programs (3.3 average; 50% rated 4 or 5) Adult programs (3.2 average; 36% rated 4 or 5) Youth camps (3.2 average; 41% rated 4 or 5) Teen programs (3.1 average; 40% rated 4 or 5) Importance vs. Needs‐Met Matrix – Current Programs. Another “Importance vs. Needs‐Met” matrix allows a comparison of programs based on level of importance and degree to which household needs are being met. Scores are depicted in this matrix by using the mid‐points for both questions to divide into four quadrants. The Importance scale midpoint was 3.3 (the median rating for importance across all programs); the Needs‐Met midpoint was 3.6 (see Figure 6). Programs in the upper right quadrant are considered to be highly important and are also adequately meeting the needs of respondent households. Though it is less critical to consider future enhancements for these programs, it is necessary to maintain them to keep community satisfaction high: Youth sports Youth programs The upper left quadrant displays programs that are perceived as important but have a lower level of needs being met. Therefore, improvements to and monitoring of these programs may boost the degree to which community members feel their household needs are being met: Family programs Outdoor adventure programs The programs located in the lower right quadrant are less important to households, but are currently meeting their needs well: Senior programs Adult programs Youth camps Teen programs Adult sports Finally, programs found in the lower left quadrant are amenities that are not meeting needs well, though they are not important to the majority of households in Meridian. These programs are considered “niche” amenities, as they are important to fewer members of the community. None of the programs evaluated by respondents fell into this category, which may make future planning and of parks and recreation resources easier. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 29 Figure 7: Current Programs – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix Invitation Sample Only Values and Vision Top Areas Parks & Recreation Should Focus on Improving Respondents were asked to identify three community issues that Meridian Parks and Recreation should focus on improving from a list of potential areas. From the list, respondents indicated their number one priority, number two priority, and number three priority. As is shown below in Figure 7, invitation respondents indicated that the top community issue is pathway connectivity (44 percent selected this as one of their top three priorities). Pathway connectivity also had the highest percentage of respondents identifying it as their number one priority (33%). Other important community issues include promoting healthy/active lifestyles (33%), family‐oriented activities (30%), maintenance of parks and facilities (25%), safety and security (25%), community‐wide special events (25%), and aquatic facilities/programming (24%). 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 How Well Needs Are Currently Being Met (Average Rating) 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 Youth Sports Youth Programs Youth Camps Family Programs Adult Programs Teen Programs Senior Programs Outdoor Adventure Programs Adult Sports Prog Needs Prog Imp High Importance/ Low Needs Met High Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ Low Needs Met Low Importance/ High Needs Met Level of Importance vs. Needs Met for Current MPRD Programs -Invitation Sample Only 30 City of Meridian, Idaho Figure 8: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined Invitation Sample Only Parks and Recreation Master Plan 31 Future Facilities, Amenities, and Services Importance of Adding/Expanding/Improving Future Facilities On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “not at all important” and 5 means “very important,” respondents rated the importance of the 26 potential future facilities. In general, most facilities were rated as highly important. The facilities that received the highest average ratings and largest share of respondents providing 4 or 5 ratings include: Indoor facilities Indoor aquatics facility (average rating 3.8; 62% provided a 4 or 5 rating) Community/recreation center (3.7 average; 62% rated 4 or 5) Fieldhouse/gymnasium space (3.2 average; 38% rated 4 or 5) Performing arts center (3.2 average; 36% rated 4 or 5) Ice rink (3.0 average; 41% rated 4 or 5) Outdoor facilities Pathways (4.1 average; 78% rated 4 or 5) Shade structures in parks (4.0 average; 78% rated 4 or 5) Improved park amenities (3.8 average; 70% rated 4 or 5) Playgrounds (3.7 average; 65% rated 4 or 5) Lights for outdoor athletic facilities (3.4 average; 49% rated 4 or 5) New parks (3.2 average; 33% rated 4 or 5) Exercise stations along pathways in parks (3.2 average; 39% rated 4 or 5) Splash pads (3.1 average; 40% rated 4 or 5) Outdoor athletic fields/courts (3.1 average; 31% rated 4 or 5) Public art in the parks (3.1 average; 40% rated 4 or 5) Fishing ponds (3.1 average; 42% rated 4 or 5) Parking at recreational facilities (3.1 average; 28% rated 4 or 5) Dog parks (3.0 average; 39% rated 4 or 5) Top Priorities to Add, Expand, or Improve Using the same list of facilities, respondents chose their priorities for most important future facilities to their households. The facility with the highest percentage of respondents selecting it as their first most important priority is a community/recreation center (16%). Other top priorities include an indoor aquatics facility (33%), community/recreation center (26%), improved park amenities (22%), and shade structures in parks (22%). 32 City of Meridian, Idaho Financial Choices/Fees In a final section of the survey, respondents answered questions about their opinions on the financial aspects of their relationship with Meridian Parks and Recreation. These questions include an evaluation of current program and facility fees, the impact of potential fee increases on level of participation, and an allocation of future funding toward various amenities. Current Fees Facility Fees. Respondents were generally likely to indicate that current facility fees are reasonable, with 30 percent of invitation respondents and 48 percent of open link respondents feeling that fees are acceptable for the value received. Eleven percent (11%) of invitation respondents feel that fees are too high, and only two percent said fees were underpriced. Fifty‐seven percent (57%) were unsure. Program Fees. Similarly, 29 percent of invitation respondents and 54 percent of open link respondents believe that current program fees are reasonable. Fourteen percent (14%) of invitation sample respondents indicated that fees are too expensive, and one percent said they are underpriced. Fifty‐six percent (56%) didn’t know. Allocation of Funding Lastly, respondents were asked, “If you had $100 to spend on parks and recreation facilities, services, and/or programs, how would you allocate that $100 across the following categories?” and were provided with a list of nine potential categories for funding. As shown in Figure 8, invitation respondents allocated funding most toward expanding aquatics ($19.44 on average) and adding more pathways ($17.69), followed by making improvements and/or renovating/maintaining existing park facilities ($12.62), and expanding programs/activities ($11.29). Items that received little funding include providing more City‐wide special events ($5.02) and a new or expanded Community Center ($6.16). Parks and Recreation Master Plan 33 Figure 9: Allocation of Funding Toward Facilities/Services/Programs – Average Allocation Amount E. Organizational and Marketing Analysis Organizational Analysis GreenPlay broadly assessed the organizational and management structure of the Parks and Recreation Department and staffing to determine effectiveness and efficiency in meeting current and future departmental responsibilities as related to the community’s needs. The needs assessment – including input from staff interviews, community and key stakeholder engagement, and level of service analysis, along with the consultant’s expertise – has identified a few areas for operational enhancement. These key organizational issues identified and observed as areas for improvement include: Better marketing and communication of activities Enhance and improve internal and external communication Improve the website so it is current and usable for patrons Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies Improve and update park and wayfinding signage and maps Increase appropriate partnerships within the community Invitation Sample Open Link $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 Average Amount Allocated $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 Average Amount Allocated Expand aquatics Add more pathways Make improvements and/or renovate and maintain existing park facilities Expand programs and activities Recreation center Add new parks Add outdoor athletic fields and courts New or expanded Community Center Provide more City-wide special events Other enhancements $17.69 $11.29 $19.44 $12.62 $8.75 $8.63 $6.16 $3.27 $7.14 $5.02 $16.29 $10.79 $16.84 $11.74 $10.91 $5.85 $5.79 $6.59 $5.37 $9.82 If you had $100 to spend on parks and recreation facilities, services, and/or pro- grams, how would you allocate that $100 across the following categories? 34 City of Meridian, Idaho Staffing Analysis GreenPlay broadly assessed the management structure and staffing levels of the Parks and Recreation Department to determine effectiveness and efficiency in meeting current and future departmental responsibilities as related to the community’s needs. Many observations were taken into account to determine if the Parks and Recreation Department had the right mix of staffing in the right places within the Department. The staffing analysis process included the observations and assessments of: Community input Community satisfaction rates Staff focus group Individual staff interviews Facility tours Observations of quality of maintenance Professional knowledge in Parks and Recreation organizations SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, & Threats) Organizational chart Staffing Considerations After considering all of the organizational observations and staffing assessment, the consultant team has determined that the Parks and Recreation Department has an adequate number of staff to operate its current system with the right mix of staff in the right places within the Department. To operate more effectively in the future and to implement the Master Plan, Parks and Recreation should consider: Staffing appropriately to maintain a current FTE for park maintenance based on acres of park land maintained per FTE Developing a standard for recreation staffing that considers: Number of sports teams managed per FTE Number of Temporary Use Permits issued and managed per FTE Number of programs and participation rates managed per FTE Add grant research and writer position (staff or contractual) Ensure that staffing resource levels can maintain existing and new facilities at or above acceptable standards as the Master Plan is implemented Marketing The main reasons for not using Meridian programs or amenities include: Focus group participants indicated not aware of programs or facility Therefore, it is important that the Department improve communications with residents about program/event offerings and Department information. Increasing the use of social media Incorporating smart phone app offerings like that of the GoStrive App which can help: Build a stronger, healthier community through activities and programs Cultivate an interactive link between agencies and participating individuals Optimize programs with powerful analytics to reduce costs and generate revenue NRPA member? Join the “GoStrive. Go Play.” campaign – it’s free! Parks and Recreation Master Plan 35 G. Recreation Programming Analysis Program Development Understanding core services in the delivery of parks and recreation services will allow the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to improve upon those areas while developing strategies to assist in the delivery of other services. The basis of determining core services should come from the vision and mission developed by the City and what brings the greatest community benefit in balance with the competencies of the Department, current trends, and the market. The Department should pursue program development around the priorities identified by customer feedback, program evaluation process, and research. The following criteria should be examined when developing new programs. Need: outgrowth of a current popular program, or enough demonstrated demand to successfully support a minimal start (one class for instance) Budget: accounting for all costs and anticipated (conservative) revenues should meet cost recovery target established by the Department Location: appropriate, available, and within budget Instructor: qualified, available, and within budget Materials and supplies: available and within budget Marketing effort: adequate and timely opportunity to reach intended market, within budget (either existing marketing budget or as part of new program budget) Further research into what types of programming would be successful needs to be done. Successful programs utilize continuous creative assessments, research, and planning. The Department has a process that evaluates the success of current program offerings and criteria to determine if new program ideas should be instituted or if changes should be made to current programs. Maintaining the current dashboards and evaluation process will help to ensure success. Moreover, new leisure and recreation trends may drive different needs. It is very easy to focus on programs that have worked for a number of years, especially if they are still drawing enough interested participants to justify the program’s continuation. Starting new programs, based on community demand and/or trends, can be risky, due to the inability to predict their success. If the program interest seems great, as with those identified in the citizen survey, then the programs should be expanded. Available space may hinder new or expanded opportunities in some cases. Using historical participation levels to determine program popularity and participant feedback can be helpful in deciding if programs should be continued. In addition, utilizing citizen surveys and participant feedback, and researching trends in park and recreational programming are useful tools in determining future programming needs and desires. Sources for trends information include: State Parks and Recreation Associations and Conferences National Recreation and Parks Association International Health, Racquet, and Sports Association Parks and Recreation Trade Publications Outdoor Recreation Publications 36 City of Meridian, Idaho Program Evaluation All current programs should be evaluated annually to determine if they should be continued, changed (market segment focus, time/day offered, etc.), or discontinued. A few simple questions should be asked about each program that includes: Is participation increasing or decreasing? If participation is increasing, then it could clearly mean that the program should be continued. If participation is decreasing, are there any steps to take to increase interest through marketing efforts, a change in the time/day of the program is offered, and a change in the format or instructor? If not, it may be time to discontinue the program. Is there information contained in the participation feedback that can be used to improve the program? Are cost recovery goals being met? If not, can fees be realistically increased? Is there another provider of the program that is more suitable to offer it? If yes, the Department could provide referrals for its customers for the program it does not or is not willing or able to offer. Is this program taking up facility space that could be used for expansion of more popular programs or new programs in demand by the community? H. Operations and Maintenance Analysis Parks and Recreation is responsible for maintaining public open spaces and for providing a quality system of parks and recreation facilities and positive leisure opportunities available to all persons in the community. The Department also is responsible for the development and maintenance of the pathways system and the urban forest. The Meridian Parks and Recreation system consists of 387 acres of parkland, 255 acres of developed parks and 132 acres of undeveloped land. The system is made up of 19 parks (not including Lakeview Golf Course): 3 undeveloped sites, just less than 22 miles of pathways, 13 miles of micro pathways, a senior center, and a community center. Additionally, Parks and Recreation offers a variety of recreational programs, adult sports leagues, special events, and handles shelter reservations and temporary use permits. Community Input Focus Groups Public Process for the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan was held January 26 – 28, 2015 and consisted of 125 participants in eight focus groups, 8 stakeholder interviews and a public forum. Focus Groups were asked, “What are the strengths of the Parks and Recreation Department that should be continued over the next several years?” The top 3 responses were: 1. High quality parks 2. Parks well maintained 3. Innovative unique parks Parks and Recreation Master Plan 37 Other top responses included: 1. Parks well distributed 2. Variety of amenities 3. Commitment to maintenance 4. Athletic field good quality 5. Number of parks Focus Group attendees were asked, “What improvements are needed at existing facilities?” The top responses were: 1. Disconnected pathways 2. Parking at most parks during major events 3. Shade and mature trees in parks 4. Field space for diversity of sports Maintenance The City of Meridian and the Department are committed to the highest levels of maintenance. As part of the newly adopted Strategic Plan for the City and the CARE (Customer Service, Accountability, Respect, and Excellence) Values, commitment to excellence is clearly defined. Maintenance throughout the year takes many forms and task including (but not limited to) mowing, snow removal at multiple sites, downtown tree and flower pot upkeep, event support, irrigation, urban forestry, playgrounds, and ballfield grooming. Using existing data from the Parks and Recreation dashboards, the graphs below illustrate the growth in total park acreage, park acreage per 1,000 persons and the linear feet of pathways maintained by the Department. Figure 10: Park Acreage 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 To t a l P a r k A c r e s Year Meridian Park Acreage Added Park Acres Existing Park Acres 38 City of Meridian, Idaho Figure 11: Pathways Maintained Figure 12: Developed Park Acres per 1,000 People Conclusion As the parks and recreation system continues to expand and maintenance responsibilities increase, staffing and equipment levels must be increased to meet citizen expectations and protect the City’s investment. In addition to new facilities, an emphasis was identified through the focus groups of maintaining current facilities that continue to provide a safe, functional, and aesthetically pleasing park system. 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Li n e a l F e e t o f M a i n t a i n e d P a t h w a y s Year Pathways Maintained by the City Lineal Feet of Maintained Pathways Added Existing Lineal Feet of Maintained Pathways 0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Ac r e s p e r T h o u s a n d P e o p l e To t a l P a r k A c r e s Year Meridian Park Acreage Total Park Acres Acres/thousand people Parks and Recreation Master Plan 39 As the population of Meridian continues to grow, significant investment will need to be made to maintain the current level of service at four acres of developed park land per 1,000 people. COMPASS estimates that the population of Meridian will grow to 151,081 by the year 2040. To maintain the current level of service, it will require 604 acres of developed park land. That will require the development of the existing 132 acres of undeveloped park land and the addition of 217 acres of park land. Additionally, to complete the pathway system, it will take community investment and cooperation from the private sector. Specific recommendations for parks operations are: Continue to develop and review written maintenance standards. Continue to maintain quality standard park area maintenance. Continue providing staff training that is appropriate for the assigned areas of expertise. Evaluate the distribution of maintenance staff and areas of responsibilities to ensure the greatest efficiencies of resources on a regular basis. Plan for additional needs for staffing, equipment, and resources as the Department continues to grow in response to development and growth in Meridian. Continuously evaluate existing facilities, develop maintenance needs, and perform identified upgrades that maintain user expectations and quality standards. I. Financial Analysis Funding Resources & Cost Recovery, Current Circumstances Parks and Recreation facilities, programs, and services are very important to the community and are in high demand. However, not all facilities, programs, and services are equal. In general, the more a facility, program, or service provides a community benefit to citizens of Meridian as a whole, the more that element is paid for by all citizens as part of the City’s general fund. The more a facility, program, or service provides individual benefits, the more that element is paid for by user fees. This funding and cost recovery philosophy acknowledges the tremendous public benefits of parks and recreation to the community, not only in the obvious ways it provides recreational opportunities to the citizens, but for the sometimes unrecognized benefits of promoting economic development, crime prevention, and community health. In all cases, the City seeks to leverage partnerships wherever possible and in the best interest of the citizens to help fund the facilities, programs, and services they provide to the community. The following are some specific examples of how various Parks and Recreation facilities, programs, and services fall on that continuum and how they are paid for. Park Construction New park construction relies on impact fees whenever possible for funding a new park that is being developed to maintain the existing level of service (defined for this purpose in acres per thousand residents). When impact fees are not available or when developing parks to increase the level of service, general funds are used. Grants are also sought, such as those from the Solid Waste Advisory Commission (SWAC), the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and other sources. Whenever possible and in the best interest of the City, partnerships are also used to help develop new parks and/or specific amenities within them. 40 City of Meridian, Idaho Park Maintenance Park maintenance benefits the entire community and is funded from the City’s General Fund. Volunteers are leveraged wherever possible to help save labor and costs. Sports In the sports programs, Meridian recovers all direct costs (balls, nets, bases, etc.) through user fees. Fees also cover the costs for all part‐time and seasonal labor (scorekeepers, umpires, etc.) directly associated with the program. A 20 percent administrative charge is added to cover a portion of the time associated with full‐time staff (recreation coordinator, front desk) that plan and support the sports leagues. The Department charges an additional fee (currently $10 per player) as non‐ resident fees, for participants who do not pay taxes to the City of Meridian. Classes & Camps For classes and camps, fees are set to recover all direct costs, based on the anticipated number of participants. Direct costs include all part‐time/seasonal staffing for the camp, supplies, equipment, and transportation. A 10 percent administrative charge is added to help cover a portion of the time associated with full‐time staff (recreation coordinator, front desk) that plan and support the camps. Most classes are taught by independent contractors, where the contractor establishes the fee and the Department requires a 20 percent split of their fee to come to the City to cover the administrative costs of scheduling the classes and publishing the Activity Guide. Events The cost recovery philosophy for events varies by event. For example, some events (i.e., CableOne Movie Night, Community Block Party, and Christmas in Meridian) are paid for up front by the City, with the understanding that the Department will generate the revenue to break even on all direct costs through the sale of sponsorships, concessions revenue, etc. A second type of event is one that the City chooses to pay for. With these events (Gene Kleiner Day, Independence Day Celebration), there has been a deliberate decision by the City not to seek sponsorships. For Gene Kleiner Day, the focus is on Gene Kleiner and his donation of Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park. Currently, revenues from the Mayor’s State of the City Address are helping to cover the costs of this event. For the Independence Day Celebration, there are matching funds from the Meridian Speedway for fireworks and putting on a community celebration in Storey Park and the City of Meridian is the presenting sponsor. The third type of event is fundraisers. With these events (i.e., Barn Sour Race, Disc Golf Fall Classic) all direct costs are paid for by the event, and revenues are maximized. All additional revenues, after expenses, are used for a specific purpose—for example, proceeds from the Barn Sour Race help to fund the Care Enough to Share fund, and the Disc Golf Fall Classic helps to fund a specific park improvement to be selected by the Parks and Recreation Commission. For outside events put on through Temporary Use Permits (TUP) in parks, the event organizers are expected to cover all costs, including staffing costs for City staff that have to be at the event for set‐up, trash collection, and other duties. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 41 Pathways When developed by the City, pathways are paid for by the City’s General Fund or grants, not impact fees. Impact fees are not currently charged for pathways, because most pathways are required to be constructed through the development process. Memorial Tree Program The Memorial Tree Program is set up to cover all direct costs associated with creating and placing the plaque. The fee structure should be revisited with a look at covering the long term costs and possible revenue generation for the City. Picnic Shelter Reservations Fees for shelter reservations are set to cover the direct costs for cleaning the shelter and posting the reservation. High‐demand shelters may be set higher as a potential revenue source for the City. These fees have not changed in many years and should be revisited and updated. Field/Court Reservations Field/court reservation fees (i.e., softball field, soccer field, tennis court, etc.) are set based on regional trends for fees, supply and demand, and what the City Council determines to be in the best interest of the City. These fees should be periodically reviewed and updated. Financial Sustainability It is important for the City to develop a Resource Allocation and Pricing Philosophy that reflects the values of the community and the responsibility it has to the community. This Philosophy will be especially important if the City moves forward with the development of new programs, additional and/or expanded facilities, and as it strives for sustainability and determines how much it is willing to subsidize operations with tax dollars. One means of accomplishing this goal is applying a process using an industry tool called the “Pyramid Methodology.” This methodology develops and implements a refined cost recovery philosophy and pricing policy based on current “best practices” as determined by the mission of the agency and the program’s benefit to the community and/or individual. Critical to this philosophical undertaking is the support and understanding of elected officials and ultimately citizens. Whether or not significant changes are called for, the agency wants to be certain that it is philosophically aligned with its residents. The development of the core services, cost recovery philosophy, and policy is built on a very logical foundation, using the understanding of who is benefitting from recreation services to determine how the costs for that service should be offset. Recreation programs and services are sorted along a continuum of what delivers the greatest community benefit to what delivers the greatest individual benefit. The amount of subsidy for each level (not necessarily each individual program) is then determined to create an overall cost recovery philosophy. 42 City of Meridian, Idaho Developing effective ongoing systems that help measure success in reaching cost recovery goals and anticipate potential pitfalls are dependent on the following: Understanding of current revenue streams and their sustainability. Tracking all expenses and revenues for programs, facilities, and services to understand their contributions to overall department cost recovery. Analyzing who is benefiting from programs, facilities, and services and to what degree they should be subsidized. Acknowledging the full cost of each program (those direct and indirect costs associated with program delivery) and where the program fits on the continuum, of who benefits from the program or service to determine appropriate cost recovery targets. Defining direct costs as those that typically exist purely because of the program and the change with the program. Defining in‐direct costs as those that are typically costs that would exist anyway (like full‐time staff, utilities, administration, debt service etc.). Program fees should not be based on ability to pay, but an objective program should be in place that allows for easy access for lower income participants, through availability of scholarships and/or discounts. In many instances, qualification for scholarships and/or discounts can mirror requirements for free or reduced cost lunch in schools. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 43 IV. What We Have Now – Inventory and Level of Service Analysis A. Inventory and Assessment The purpose of this Level of Service (LOS) analysis is to evaluate how facilities and parks in Meridian serve the community. This analysis may be used as a tool to benchmark current level of service and to direct future planning efforts. Combined with other findings, including survey results and focus group and stakeholder feedback, it also indicates the level of service anticipated by the community. Asset Inventory A detailed inventory of public and semi‐public physical assets available for recreational use by the Meridian community was assembled for the Level of Service analysis. This asset inventory was created to serve Meridian in a number of ways. It can be used for a variety of planning and operations tasks, such as asset management and land acquisition, as well as future strategic and master plans. The assets inventory currently includes public parks, recreation areas, and pathways managed by the City of Meridian. Additionally, it was recognized that alternative providers, such as Homeowners’ Associations, Schools and Western Ada Recreation District (WARD) facilities, provide a significant inventory of neighborhood, walk‐to, and recreation opportunities. Due to limitations of time and resources, a selected sampling of alternative providers was included in the full inventory and level of service analysis. Additional alternative provider facilities owned the by City of Boise and other Homeowners’ Associations were located using existing GIS data or aerial photography identification and included for reference. Scoring for these facilities and amenities were assumed to meet expectations and were included in the Level of Service analysis. The following is a summary of the overall inventoried sites. Visited and Assessed 21 Meridian Parks 217 Components 10 Indoor Facilities Including Meridian Community Center, Senior Center, City Hall, 6 School Gymnasiums, and YMCA Home Court 9 Alternative Provider Parks (WARD, Boise Parks, Schools) 58 Components Included 21.8 miles of pathways, including City pathways and various Alternative Providers, and 13 miles of Micro Paths Located and Assumed Scoring 64 Components at other HOA parks 63 Components at other schools 44 City of Meridian, Idaho Map A shows the study area and key locations of properties. Larger scale maps are provided as separate documents. Map A: City of Meridian system map showing all inventory included for GRASP® analysis. B. GRASP® Methodology Level of Service for a community parks and recreation system is indicative of the ability of people to pursue active lifestyles. It can have implications in regard to health and wellness, the local economy, and quality of life and tends to reflect community values. It is emblematic of the manner and extent to which people are connected to their communities. The GRASP® Methodology involves mapping, scoring, demographics, and interpretation of the resulting perspectives to yield a picture of recreational service in a study area. The various efforts undertaken for this study are described below with general findings summarized in the following section. An analytical technique known as GRASP® (Geo‐Referenced Amenities Standard Process) was used to analyze Level of Service (LOS) provided by assets in the City of Meridian. This proprietary process, used exclusively by GreenPlay and Design Concepts, yields analytical maps and data that may be used to examine access to recreation across the study area. A detailed history and description of GRASP® Methodology may be found in Appendix F. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 45 Asset Scoring In planning for the delivery of parks and recreation services, it is useful to think of parks, pathways, indoor facilities, and other public spaces as parts of an infrastructure. This infrastructure allows people to exercise, socialize, and maintain a healthy physical, mental, and social wellbeing. The infrastructure is made up of components that support this goal. Components include amenities, such as playgrounds, picnic shelters, courts, fields, indoor facilities, and other elements that allow the system to meet recreational needs of a community. A component is a feature that people go to a park or recreation center to use, such as a tennis court to play a game of tennis, which gives users reason to visit and serve as an intended destination. A standardized list of GRASP® components is used to classify each asset in the system. This list of components and definitions can be found in Appendix F. In the inventory of assets, the following information is collected: Component type and location Evaluation of component functionality Evaluation of associated comfort and convenience features at a location Evaluation of general design and ambience at a location Site photos General comments All components are scored based on condition, size, site capacity, and overall quality as they reflect the expected quality of recreational features as compared with typical facilities in the City of Meridian. A three‐tier rating system is used to evaluate these: 1 = Below Expectations 2 = Meets Expectations 3 = Exceeds Expectations 46 City of Meridian, Idaho Not all parks are created equal. GRASP® Level of Service (LOS) analysis also takes into account important aspects of user experience often that are easily overlooked. For example, the GRASP® system acknowledges the important differences between these identical playground structures: (Note, these park photos have been included for illustrative purposes. They are not located in Meridian.) The immediate surroundings of a component affect how well it functions, so in addition to scoring components, each park site or indoor facility is given a set of scores to rate its comfort, convenience, and ambient qualities. This includes traits, such as the availability of restrooms, drinking water, shade, scenery, etc. These modifier values are then attributed to any component at a given location and serve to enhance component and location scores. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 47 A final inventory atlas is provided as a separate document. This atlas includes maps and corresponding data, including scoring and comments for all outdoor locations. Indoor data and scoring is also included. Below is an example of a map and data page for Champion Park from that document. The final dataset can be used to run a variety of reports and queries. For example, summary tables can be produced. The following summary table shows each Meridian park in the inventory, as well as each identified recreation component available. A separate table then shows all of the indoor facilities and their respective components. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Ta b l e 5: Ou t d o o r In v e n t o r y Su m m a r y Ta b l e * Th e s e ac r e a g e s re f l e c t th e to t a l pa r c e l s in GI S an d ar e no t ne c e s s a r i l y th e sp e c i f i c ac r e a g e s tr a c k e d fo r ea c h si t e by th e MP R De p a r t m e n t LO C A T I O N C L A S S G I S AC R E S A q u a F e a t , S p r a y B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e B a l l f i e l d B a s k e t b a l l B a t t i n g C a g e B o c c e B a l l C o m p l e x , B a l l f i e l d C o m p l e x , H o r s e s h o e s C o m p l e x , T e n n i s C o n c e s s i o n s D i s k G o l f D o g P a r k D r i v i n g R a n g e E d u c a t i o n a l E x p e r i e n c e E v e n t S p a c e G a r d e n , C o m m u n i t y G a r d e n , D i s p l a y G o l f H o r s e s h o e s L o o p W a l k M P F i e l d , A l l S i z e s O p e n T u r f Open Water Other‐Active Passive Node Picnic Grounds Playground, All Sizes Public Art Shelter, All Sizes Skate Park Tennis Volleyball Water Access, General Water Feature Ju l i u s M. Kl e i n e r P a r k R e g i o n a l 5 7 . 9 9 2 1 1 1 . 5 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 2 5 1 3 5 12 Se t t l e r s P a r k R e g i o n a l 5 6 . 1 2 3 1 1 6 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 6 6 2 1 4 10 Be a r Cr e e k P a r k C o m m u n i t y 1 8 . 8 0 1 9 2 1 1 1 1 11 He r o e s P a r k C o m m u n i t y 3 0 . 1 5 0 1 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 21 St o r e y P a r k C o m m u n i t y 1 7 . 9 0 4 3 2 1 3 1 1 12 Tu l l y P a r k C o m m u n i t y 1 8 . 4 7 7 8 2 1 11 12 1 8t h St r e e t P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 2 . 7 8 2 9 1 11 Ch a m p i o n P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 5 . 9 8 3 0 1 11 11 Ch a t e a u P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 6 . 7 1 6 3 1 1 11 11 Go r d o n Ha r r i s P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 1 1 . 1 3 7 0 11 1 11 Re n a i s s a n c e P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 6 . 5 2 6 4 1 11 11 Se a s o n s P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 6 . 9 5 3 3 1 11 1 1 1 Ce n t e n n i a l P a r k M i n i 0 . 4 5 2 0 0 . 5 1 1 1 1 Co x Mo n u m e n t M i n i 0 . 1 0 8 2 1 1 1 Fi r e St a t i o n No . 4 P a r k M i n i 0 . 5 9 0 6 1 Ci t y Ha l l Pl a z a S p e c i a l Us e 0 . 9 2 7 9 11 1 1 1 Ge n e r a t i o n s Pl a z a S p e c i a l Us e 0 . 2 4 7 8 11 1 He r i t a g e Ba l l Fi e l d s S p e c i a l Us e 2 2 . 6 8 6 0 1 4 3 Ja b i l Fi e l d s S p e c i a l Us e 8 . 3 9 8 0 2 La k e v i e w Go l f Co u r s e G o l f 1 1 9 . 4 2 6 3 11 3 9 2 . 3 8 5 0 2 2 1 6 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 4 23 1 5 4 11 1 1 9 1 1 2 2 9 2 2 9 1 1 3 5 2 5 1 1 0 1 2 4 To t a l s : Parks and Recreation Master Plan 51 Table 6: Indoor Inventory Summary Table (All facilities in data set) Catchment Areas People use a variety of transit modes to reach a recreation destination: on foot, on a bike, in a car, via public transportation, or utilizing any combination of these or other alternatives. The mode is often determined, at least in part, by the distance to be travelled. The GRASP® system accounts for this by applying more than one catchment area distance to examine access to assets. A catchment area on a map, also called a buffer, is a circle drawn around each component at a specific distance. Any point within this distance reflects the score of that component. This is called a service area. These buffers are overlapped and used to calculate a total GRASP® Level of Service score for any given point within the study area that reflects service from all nearby assets. This process yields the data used to create all perspective maps and analytical charts. The GRASP® methodology typically applies two different catchment area distances to calculate scoring totals, yielding two distinct perspectives used to examine a recreation system: 1. General Access to Recreation 2. Walkable Access to Recreation General Access analysis applies a primary catchment distance of one mile. This is considered a suitable distance for a bike ride or a short drive in a car. This one‐mile catchment is intended to capture recreational users travelling from home or elsewhere to a park or facility by way of bike, bus, or automobile. Walkable Access analysis uses a smaller catchment distance to capture users within walking distance of recreation facilities. This distance can range from as short as 1/4 mile to as long as 1/2 mile, depending on the study area. For the City of Meridian, a 1/2 mile catchment buffer was used. This catchment distance used in GRASP® studies represents a fifteen‐minute walk for most users. LOCATION Ga l l e r y Gy m n a s i u m Ki t c h e n ‐ Ki t c h e n e t t e Mu l t i ‐pu r p o s e Pa t i o / Ou t d o o r se a t i n g Re t a i l / Pr o ‐sh o p City Hall 2 1 Cole Valley Christian School 2 Heritage Middle School 1 Meridian Academy 1 Meridian Community Center 2 Meridian Middle School 1 Meridian Senior C e n t e r 1 1511 Paramount Elementary School 1 Willow Creek Elementary School 1 YMCA Homecourt 4 T o t a l s : 3 1 1 1811 52 City of Meridian, Idaho Academic and professional research is inconclusive on the topic of just how far people are willing to walk for recreation. Some agencies have used 1/2 mile as a walkable distance in studies they have conducted. Other studies in this country and internationally have used one mile or one kilometer (.62 miles) as walkable distances. Assumptions 1. Proximity equates to access. This means that the presence of a recreational facility within a specific distance indicates that facility is accessible from a location. “Accessibility” in this analysis does not refer specifically to ADA accessibility. 2. General access equates to proximity of 1 mile, a reasonable distance for a drive in a car. 3. Walkable access equates to proximity of 1/2 mile, a reasonable distance attainable in 15 minutes walking at a leisurely pace. Level of Service Analysis Maps and data quantifications produced using the GRASP® methodology are known as perspectives. Each perspective is a model of how service is being provided across the study area. The model can be further analyzed to derive statistical information about service in a variety of ways. Maps are utilized along with tables and charts to provide benchmarks a community may use to determine its success in providing services. The score of any component is reflected at any point within a catchment area that surrounds it. As illustrated in Figure 12, these areas are overlapped and used to calculate a total GRASP® Level of Service score for any given point within the study area, in this case the City of Meridian. When service areas for multiple components are plotted on a map, a picture emerges that represents the cumulative level of service provided by that set of components in a geographic area. This process yields the data used to create all perspective maps and analytical charts. The graphic below illustrates the process assuming all three components and the park boundary itself, and thus all catchments, are scored a “2.” Figure 13: GRASP® Catchment and Scoring Example Parks and Recreation Master Plan 53 A basic algorithm is used to calculate scoring totals for every park and indoor facility in the inventory and is illustrated in Figure 13. Figure 14: GRASP® Scoring Calculation Perspective maps and charts are produced by applying the GRASP® process to the City of Meridian inventory. Shown on a heat map, cumulative GRASP® scoring for any part of the study area is represented by darker or lighter shades for higher/lower scores, respectively. GRASP® recognizes that every agency is unique and should be measured on its own standards. This same data can also be used to portray areas that meet or do not meet a minimum standard, represented by different colors. A threshold map displays the data related to a minimum standard GRASP® score, called a threshold. A threshold score is normally set by the score of a typical “neighborhood” park within a recreation system but may also be set using a median score, average score, or some other statistical indicator. Based on the consistency in “Neighborhood Parks” in Meridian, a typical neighborhood park equivalent was used in determining the threshold. See Appendix F for in‐depth discussion on threshold calculation. Darker and lighter orange shades on a heat map show areas with higher or lower level of service respectively. Also shown are outdoor locations, indoor locations, and city infrastructure. •Each component receives a score 1 , 2, or 3 •Site modifiers are added up to determine a multiplier 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 •"Design & Ambiance" as a stand alone modifer 1, 2, or 3 •All modified component scores add up to a total score for a park or indoor facility 79.2 54 City of Meridian, Idaho Purple, yellow, and grey shades on a threshold map show areas that meet the minimum standard, fall below the minimum standard, or have no level of service respectively. The illustrations above show two common types of perspective maps‐‐the heat map and the threshold map. On a heat map, a darker orange shade results from the overlap of more service areas or areas served by higher quality components. For any given spot on a perspective map there is a GRASP® Level of Service score that reflects cumulative scoring for nearby assets. This perspective shows generally those areas with access to more or better recreation opportunities. The threshold map shows the same data as compared to a minimum standard GRASP® score. The following sections will discuss the inventory, analysis, and findings from the City of Meridian GRASP® Level of Service Analysis. C. GRASP® Analysis The GRASP® Methodology involves the overlap of mapping, scoring, demographics, and interpretation of the resulting perspectives to yield a picture of recreational service in a study area. Efforts undertaken for the City of Meridian analysis are described in full detail below. Findings and recommendations are summarized in the following section. Neighborhood Access to All Recreation The Level of Service analysis indicates neighborhood access to recreation in the City of Meridian by any means of transportation within a 1‐ mile radius with a premium for 1/2 mile walkability and is represented in Map Series B. Map B‐1 shows level of service provided by the City of Meridian and Alternative Providers as unique services. Service provided by the City of Meridian is represented in an orange gradient, and service provided by alternative providers in blue gradient. The threshold map, shown in Map B‐5, displays GRASP® scoring based on a minimum standard GRASP® score, the threshold. Values at or above the threshold are displayed as purple, while values below the given threshold are yellow. The analysis in Map B‐5 does not distinguish between ownership and includes all recreation opportunities available to users. A series of analysis iterations (Maps B‐2 through B‐4) are developed that show levels of service and threshold analysis based on City of Meridian provision and alternative provider provision. Further discussion and Maps B‐2 ‐ B‐4 may be found in Appendix F. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 55 The heat map, shown in Map B‐1 suggests that the study area has good distribution of facilities and good general access to parks and recreation facilities. In Map B‐5, areas displayed in purple can be thought of as having adequate level of service. Areas in yellow indicate that service is below threshold. Residents living in areas of dark gray are within the City of Meridian limits but must travel further than one mile to access recreation. Map B‐1: Neighborhood Access to All Recreation in the City of Meridian is displayed here as a heat map, with service from City facilities shown distinct from those of alternative providers. 56 City of Meridian, Idaho Map B‐5: Neighborhood Access to All Recreation in the City of Meridian is displayed here as a threshold map, with service from all providers analyzed together. Chart 1 shows statistics for general access to recreation (mapped in Map B‐5) as compared to the threshold value based on land in the City of Meridian. It shows the percentages of the city limits that either have no service, fall below this threshold value, or exceed this threshold. While 98 percent of the City has access to some recreation, over 3/4 of that land is above threshold. This is a good indication that where service is provided, it is at a high level. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 57 Chart 1: Access to all Recreation Pie Chart Walkable Access to Recreation Walkability is a measure of how user‐friendly an area is to people travelling on foot. A walkable environment has benefits with regard to public health, the local economy, and quality of life. Many factors influence walkability and include the presence or absence and quality of footpaths, sidewalks or other pedestrian rights‐of‐way, traffic and road conditions, land use patterns, and safety considerations among others. Perhaps the most significant factors affecting walkability in a study area are barriers. Barriers are typically major streets and highways, waterways, or railroad tracks that restrict pedestrian or bicycle movement and pose a potential risk to public safety. Barriers were determined for the City of Meridian and used to “clip” the service coverage for the walkable level of service perspective analysis. This accounts for these obstacles as deterrents to active transportation that serves to limit access to recreation. The Walkable Level of Service perspective models access to recreation using a 1/2 mile catchment distance exclusively. This represents a convenient distance to access recreation on foot or by bike and can be achieved by an average person within a 15‐minute walk. This analysis does not recognize any service across a barrier. The walkability heat map in Map C‐1 shows access to recreation in the City of Meridian by walking or other non‐motorized travel mode. The effect of the barriers is notable in this perspective map. Map C‐5 displays GRASP® scoring based on the same threshold used in Map Series B. A series of analysis iterations (Maps C‐2 through C‐4) have been developed that show levels of service and threshold analysis based on City of Meridian provision and alternative provider provision. Further discussion may be found in Appendix F. 58 City of Meridian, Idaho Map C‐1: Walkable Access to Recreation in the City of Meridian is displayed here as a heat map, with service from City facilities shown distinct from those of alternative providers. Map C‐5, shows the combined threshold analysis for walkability with no distinction as to ownership. This perspective map shows significant portions of the City at or above the threshold in walkability but also reveals many areas that fall below threshold and with no service. This analysis indicates that while overall Meridian may not be a very walk‐friendly city, there are areas, subdivisions, and neighborhoods that could be considered very walkable. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 59 Map C‐5: This threshold map shows Walkable Access to all recreation in the City of Meridian based on all providers. A minimum standard GRASP® score is again used in this perspective to show service above or below threshold from any provider. Chart 2, shows statistics for walkable access to recreation (as mapped in Map C‐5) applying a threshold. Based on land area in the City of Meridian. While 81 percent of the City that has walkable access, only 24 percent of total City acres meet threshold, and 57 percent falls below the threshold value. A total of 19 percent of the City is without walkable service within 1/2 mile. Chart 2: Walkability of City of Meridian by land area 60 City of Meridian, Idaho While Chart 2, above, refers to the percentage of the City within walking distance of service, it does not tell the whole story. When discussing walkability, it is very important to understand the proximity of parks to population centers. Using the ESRI population database, the percentage of the actual Meridian population can also be determined within the three service levels: at or above threshold, below threshold, and no service. The results of this further analysis are shown in Chart 3, below, which indicates that nearly 75 percent of the Meridian population has walkable access to recreation with half of the population at or above threshold. This would indicate that parks are generally well placed in relation to population areas. Chart 3: Walkability of City of Meridian by Population This population analysis can also be broken down further to look at specific portions of the population. Chart 4 shows that 77 percent of youth (ages 19 and under) live within walking distance of recreation opportunities that were included in this study, further indication that recreation is well located to serve the Meridian population. Chart 4: Youth Walkable Access to Recreation 25% 25% 50% % of Total 2014 Population No Service Below Threshold At or Above Threshold 24% 24% 52% % of Population Ages 19 and Under No Service Below Threshold At or Above Threshold Parks and Recreation Master Plan 61 A Note on Utilizing the GRASP® Perspectives GRASP® perspectives provide a snapshot to benchmark future planning efforts, but it should be noted that these analyses need to be considered along with other indicators. Used in conjunction with other needs assessment tools (such as needs surveys and a public process), GRASP® perspectives can be used to determine if current levels of service are appropriate in a given location. However, it is not necessarily beneficial for all parts of the community to score equally in the analyses. The desired level of service for any particular location will depend on the type of service being analyzed and land use or demographic characteristics of the particular location. Commercial, institutional, and industrial areas might reasonably be expected to have lower levels of service for parks and recreation opportunities than residential areas, for example. All such factors must be accounted for in order to make well informed management decisions. Access to Pathways In Meridian, as in many cities across the country, pathways are recognized as valuable and desirable components to any recreation system. The following map, Map D, shows existing pathways in Meridian, as well as planned or proposed pathways. Meridian residents have access to a number of different types of pathway providers: those pathways provided by the City of Meridian, other public providers such as WARD Parks, and semi‐public providers such as Homeowner Associations. Perceived public access may vary greatly based on some of the more restrictive neighborhood pathways. While there are a variety of opportunities to access pathways across the City, public input from this study indicates that expanded access and additional opportunities are needed. As a pathway system matures, the need emerges to address barriers, such as roadways, waterways, and railroad crossings that separate distinct pathway networks in order to create a truly connected pathway system. A pathway network is a part of a pathway system within which major barrier crossings have been addressed and all pathways are connected. Pathway networks within a pathway system are typically separated from each other by such barriers or by missing pathway connections. Signaled crosswalks, pedestrian underpasses, and bridges can be used to help users navigate barriers. New pathways may be added to link trail networks and improve overall connectivity. Most communities have several pathway networks that connect users to common destinations such as schools, shops, restaurants, and civic and religious institutions in addition to parks and recreation facilities. The more integrated these networks, the more connected a community. In response to public input regarding the need for a connected pathway and pathway system, a basic analysis is used in this mapping (Map D) that display longer segments of existing pathways in a darker shade of red. Shorter segments tend towards a light orange shade in this analysis. Pathways also serve as access to other recreation opportunities. A complete discussion of “Recreational Connectivity can be found later in this document. 62 City of Meridian, Idaho Map D: This map shows current, planned, and proposed pathways in the City of Meridian GRASP® Comparative Data The GRASP® Index, or the overall GRASP® value per capita, for the City of Meridian is 18. Because every community is unique, there are no standard or “correct” numbers for these. However, it is useful to note that the GRASP® Index for the City of Meridian falls within the mid‐range. Table 7 provides comparative data from other communities. For reference, statistics have been included for other communities of similar size in addition to smaller and larger communities across the country. It is notable that the GRASP® Index score for Meridian is similar or higher than most other cities listed with population in the 90,000 to 116,000 range. Meridian also has one of the higher “average number of components per site” and “average score per site” if compared to other cities. These are prime indicators of the well‐developed Neighborhood and Community Parks in Meridian vs. other communities. Additionally, the average level of service per acre served and percentage of area with level of service are the highest of other cities of similar size. Finally, the Meridian statistics include currently undeveloped park lands that once developed will further increase the overall level of service value. Ta b l e 7: GR A S P ® Co m p a r a t i v e Da t a ST A T E C I T Y Y E A R P O P U L A T I O N ST U D Y AR E A SI Z E (A C R E S ) # OF SI T E S (P A R K S , FA C I L I T I E S , ET C ) TO T A L # OF CO M P O N E N T S AV G . # CO M P O N E N T S PE R SI T E TO T A L GR A S P ® VA L U E (E N T I R E SY S T E M ) GR A S P ® IN D E X A V G . SC O R E / S I T E % of TOTAL AREA w/LOS >0AVG. LOS PER ACRE SERVEDNUMBER OF COMPONENTS PER POPULATIONAVERAGE LOS/POP DEN PER ACREPOPULATION DENSITY (PER ACRE) VT E s s e x 2 0 1 1 2 8 , 8 5 8 2 5 , 2 3 0 4 7 1 5 3 3 . 3 8 9 5 3 1 1 9 . 0 7 2 % 1 1 . 0 5 1 0 1 . 1 ID P o s t Fa l l s 2 0 1 1 29 , 0 6 2 2 4 , 9 2 8 35 2 7 1 7 . 7 1 0 0 5 3 5 2 8 . 7 7 1 % 1 6 9 9 1 4 5 1 . 2 OR O r e g o n Ci t y 2 0 0 6 2 9 , 5 4 0 5 , 9 4 4 5 1 2 1 5 4 . 2 N A N A N A 8 6 % 4 5 7 9 5 . 0 CO C o m m e r c e Ci t y 2 0 0 6 3 6 , 0 4 9 2 6 , 2 7 0 9 0 3 5 7 4 . 0 1 0 4 7 2 9 . 0 1 1 . 6 7 3 % 1 1 3 1 0 8 2 1 . 4 CA L a Qu i n t a 2 0 0 6 3 9 , 6 1 4 2 2 , 8 2 9 2 7 1 4 3 5 . 3 6 1 1 1 5 2 2 . 6 7 9 % 78.0 44 5 1 . 7 UT S o u t h Jo r d a n 2 0 0 6 4 4 , 2 7 6 1 4 , 0 8 1 4 8 1 7 2 3 . 6 1 5 7 8 3 6 3 2 . 9 4 4 % 2 9 . 8 4 9 3 . 1 CA P a l m Sp r i n g s 2 0 1 3 4 4 , 4 6 8 6 0 , 4 4 2 1 6 1 6 2 1 0 . 1 1 1 4 9 2 6 7 1 . 8 6 9 % 164.9 42 2 3 0 . 7 NM F a r m i n g t o n 2 0 1 4 4 6 , 8 1 5 21 , 1 7 9 98 3 5 4 3 . 6 2 2 0 4 4 8 2 2 . 5 9 7 % 2 2 3 8 1 0 1 2 . 2 OR C o r v a l l i s 2 0 1 1 54 , 4 6 2 1 8 , 0 0 6 54 3 0 9 5 . 7 2 2 1 7 4 1 4 1 . 1 9 3 % 2 8 9 6 9 6 3 . 0 MO L i b e r t y 2 0 1 3 5 6 , 0 4 1 53 , 1 6 1 39 2 9 8 7 . 6 6 0 7 1 1 1 5 . 6 5 7 % 1 0 7 5 1 0 2 1 . 1 MA B r o o k l i n e 2 0 0 9 6 0 , 0 0 0 N A 7 4 1 2 8 1 . 7 5 5 1 9 7 . 4 N A N A 2 N A N A ID M e r i d i a n 2 0 1 5 9 4 , 2 8 9 18 , 1 5 9 21 * 2 0 7 * 9 . 9 * 1 9 4 7 1 8 5 2 . 1 9 8 % 1 9 6 2 3 7 . 8 5 . 2 FL W i n t e r Ha v e n 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 4 2 , 1 9 1 3 1 2 3 0 7 . 4 3 2 8 3 1 0 . 6 3 7 % 1 7 5 2 7 3 . 8 2 . 4 TX P e a r l a n d 2 0 1 5 1 0 1 , 9 0 0 30 , 4 6 8 21 1 6 4 7 . 8 1 5 5 6 1 5 7 4 . 1 8 5 % 1 6 2 2 5 5 . 4 2 . 9 OR N o r t h Cl a c k a m a s 2 0 1 2 1 1 5 , 9 2 4 23 , 0 4 0 93 2 9 5 3 . 2 2 2 0 7 1 9 2 3 . 7 9 7 1 8 3 3 3 6 . 4 5 . 0 CO F o r t Co l l i n s 1 3 0 , 6 8 1 3 3 , 3 8 8 4 5 6 1 9 1 3 . 8 2 6 7 5 2 0 5 9 . 4 8 3 % 2 1 7 5 5 5 . 4 3 . 9 NC C a r y 2 0 1 1 1 3 9 , 3 8 2 35 , 5 7 8 43 5 6 2 1 3 . 1 2 8 4 3 2 0 6 6 . 1 9 7 % 2 2 1 4 5 6 . 4 3 . 9 IA C e d a r Ra p i d s 1 4 3 , 7 8 8 4 5 , 9 8 7 9 8 7 5 9 7 . 7 2 4 6 7 1 7 2 5 . 2 8 6 % 3 0 0 5 9 5 . 8 3 . 1 CO L a k e w o o d 1 4 4 , 3 6 9 2 7 , 4 9 4 1 0 5 7 3 8 7 . 0 6 4 7 6 4 5 6 1 . 7 1 0 0 N A 5 5 . 3 IN S o u t h Be n d 2 0 1 1 1 6 4 , 3 9 6 65 , 3 8 7 64 3 3 9 5 . 3 2 4 1 7 1 5 3 7 . 8 7 2 % 1 3 0 2 5 1 . 7 2 . 5 FL F t La u d e r d a l e 1 8 1 , 0 9 5 2 3 , 2 3 0 9 1 4 8 3 5 . 3 2 6 6 2 1 5 2 9 . 3 9 8 2 2 1 3 2 8 . 4 7 . 8 VA A r l i n g t o n 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 N A 2 2 5 4 9 4 2 . 2 N A N A N A N A N A 3 WA T a c o m a 2 0 3 , 9 8 4 3 4 , 1 3 3 1 0 4 4 8 8 4 . 7 N A N A N A N A N A 2 6 . 0 OR T H P R D 2 0 1 2 2 2 4 , 6 2 7 2 9 , 0 9 7 2 5 3 1 2 1 1 5 6 8 4 3 3 0 2 7 1 0 0 % 4 8 9 5 6 3 7 . 7 *I n c l u d e s Ci t y of Me r i d i a n as s e t s an d fa c i l i t i e s on l y Parks and Recreation Master Plan 65 D. Other Types of Analysis Capacities Analysis One of the traditional tools for evaluating service for parks and recreation is capacity analysis. This analysis compares the total acres and quantity of assets to current and future population. Table 8 shows the current capacities for all park land and selected components in the City of Meridian. Along with community and staff input, this information can be used to project future needs to accommodate population growth. Based on projected population growth in Meridian and current ratio of component to that population, the City of Meridian and/or other providers would need to add 130 acres of park land by 2020 to maintain the current level of service. This could be a single 130 acre park or multiple parks. Other projected needs include: (4) ball fields, (7) multi‐purpose fields, (3) tennis courts, (5) picnic shelters, (6) basketball courts, (7) loop walks, (3) horseshoe pits, (8) open turf areas, (1) volleyball court, and (12) playgrounds for example. These could be part of new parks or schools or added to existing parks. Table 8: Capacities LOS for Community Components Meridian, Idaho Jun-15 20 1 5 G I S A c r e s Aq u a t i c F e a t u r e , Sp r a y Ba l l f i e l d Ba s k e t b a l l Di s c G o l f Ho r s e s h o e s Lo o p W a l k MP F i e l d , a l l s i z e s Op e n T u r f Pl a y g r o u n d , a l l si z e s Sh e l t e r s , A l l S i z e s Te n n i s Vo l l e y b a l l INVENTORY City of Meridian+ 249.4 2 12 11 2 19 20 18 9 13 25 10 1 Schools 515.7 0 5 20 0 0 22 27 32 26 3 6 1 Identified Alternative Providers* 87 0 10 8 1 0 3 2 9 37 6 1 2 Total 852.1 2 27 39 3 19 45 47 50 76 34 17 4 CURRENT RATIO PER POPULATION CURRENT POPULATION 2015 94,289 Current Ratio per 1000 Population 9.04 0.02 0.29 0.41 0.03 0.20 0.48 0.50 0.53 0.81 0.36 0.18 0.04 Population per component 111 47,145 3,492 2,418 31,430 4,963 2,095 2,006 1,886 1,241 2,773 5,546 23,572 PROJECTED POPULATION - 2020 108,701 Total # needed to maintain current ratio of all existing facilities at projected population 982 2 31 45 3 22 52 54 58 88 39 20 5 Number that should be added by all providers to achieve current ratio at projected population 130 0 4 6 0 3 7 7 8 12 5 3 1 *Incomplete data available on all alternative provider park boundaries; +Only includes currently developed or planned and funded Meridian Parks. Does not include future parks or golf course Capacities LOS for Community Components 66 City of Meridian, Idaho GRASP® Index for Specific Components A capacities analysis is based purely on the quantity of assets without regard to quality or functionality. Higher LOS is achieved only by adding assets, regardless of the condition or quality of those assets. In theory, service provided by assets should be based on their quality as well as their quantity. An example will help illustrate. In the case of Meridian, playgrounds currently score at 125 and have a GRASP® Index of 1.3. Based on population projections by the year 2020, Meridian and its partners would need to provide an additional 19.1 points worth of GRASP® scoring through playgrounds to maintain the current level of service per capita. Increases in GRASP® score can occur through upgrades to current components, addition of new components, or a combination of upgrades and additions. For reference, a typical component located in a typical park with typical comfort and convenience modifiers equates to a GRASP® score of 4.8 points. This is especially useful in communities where the sustainability of the parks and recreation system over time is important. In the past, the focus was on maintaining adequate capacity as population growth occurred. Today, many communities are reaching build‐out while others have seen population growth slow. The focus in such communities has shifted to maintaining current levels of service as components age or become obsolete, or as needs change. The GRASP® Index can be used to track LOS under such conditions over time. Table 9 shows the GRASP® Indices for the various components based on the 2015 population. The authors of this report have developed a tool that incorporates both quantity and quality for any given set of assets into a single indicator called the GRASP® Index. This index is a per capita ratio of the functional score per population in thousands. The GRASP® Index can move up or down over time as either quantity or quality changes. For example, if all of the playgrounds in a community are allowed to deteriorate over time, but none are added or taken away, the LOS provided by the playgrounds is decreasing. Similarly, if all of the playgrounds are replaced with new and better ones, but no additional playgrounds are added, the LOS increases even though the per‐capita quantity of playgrounds did not change. GRASP® score for any component is also directly impacted by the Design & Ambiance score, as well as comfort and convenience modifiers of any given park. Improvements or upgrades to these park features will also impact the scoring. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 67 Table 9: GRASP® Community Component Index Projected Community Components GRASP® Index 2020 Current Population 2015 94,289 Projected Population 2020 108,701 Total GRASP® Community Score per component type GRASP® score per 1000 population (GRASP® Index) Total GRASP® score needed at projected population Additional GRASP® score needed Aquatic Feature, Spray 18.6 0.2 21.4 2.8 Ballfield 106.5 1.1 122.8 16.3 Basketball 88.5 0.9 102.0 13.5 Community Gardens 11.7 0.1 13.5 1.8 Horseshoes 180.0 1.9 207.5 27.5 Loop Walks 80.4 0.9 92.7 12.3 MP Field, all sizes 131.5 1.4 151.6 20.1 Open Turf 75.5 0.8 87.0 11.5 Passive Nodes 74.6 0.8 86.0 11.4 Playground, all sizes 125.0 1.3 144.1 19.1 Public Art 44.7 0.5 51.5 6.8 Shelter, all sizes 189.6 2.0 218.6 29.0 Tennis 137.6 1.5 158.6 21.0 68 City of Meridian, Idaho E. Summary of Findings Several general findings were revealed by the City of Meridian GRASP® Analysis. These may be summarized as follows: For neighborhood access to parks and recreation, Meridian offers: A wide variety of well distributed recreational opportunities. High quality and well maintained parks. Good access with over 75 percent of land area above threshold when considering all providers. Definite distinction between “Community Parks” and “Neighborhood Parks.” An overall high level of service if accessed by an automobile. High scoring “Regional Parks” or “Community Parks.” A high number of components and average score per site when compared to some other communities. Some large “pockets” of high level of service. Great restroom standards. For walkable level of service: While “Neighborhood Parks” often score high enough to meet the “threshold,” a lack of pathway access often keeps an area below the threshold mark. Some parks, especially “Neighborhood Parks,” lack unique or identifiable character. Alternative providers are an important supplement to Meridian’s “Neighborhood” level of service. There is heavy reliance on alternative providers (including schools) for walkable neighborhood level of service in many areas, and the quality of alternative providers’ parks vary greatly across the system. Demographic analysis shows good distribution of parks where young people live with over 75 percent of 0‐19 age group having walkable access to some recreation service. There is a need to identify and collect inventory data on the remaining alternative provider parks/facilities. Access to a quality, connected pathway system is limited and greatly impacts overall walkable level of service in Meridian. For pathways and pathway access: There a variety of pathways are available across the City, but they are not meeting the needs and demands of the community. Many of the pathways within Meridian are not connected to the larger overall pathway system. A significant portion of these pathways may have limited or restricted access based on locations within subdivisions. Pathway access is notably absent from some Meridian residential neighborhoods. Based on projected population growth over the next 5‐7 years, Meridian and its partners need: Additional park land and components added to the system to maintain current level of service. To improve or upgrade existing components to maintain current level of service. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 69 Preliminary Recommendations Improve recreational connectivity through neighborhood pathway connections and park “spurs.” Continue to improve level of service especially at “Neighborhood” Parks through upgrades or additional components if pathways cannot be added. Work with neighborhoods to create an individual identity for each neighborhood park. Work with alternative providers to increase level of service in areas Meridian doesn’t have neighborhood parks but level of service is low. Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks. F. Park Classifications The Nature of Classification Systems Park classification systems are commonly utilized by park and recreation agencies. Most park and recreation agencies organize lands and facilities into various classes, types, categories, or other schemes as a planning and management tool. However, once established, classification schemes are rarely modified and over time may lose effectiveness as a tool, due to changing values of an agency or a community. Purposes for classifying lands and facilities into different categories include: Determination of policies and strategies for management and operation of lands and facilities. Definition of categories of need for land and facilities and identifying potential acquisitions to meet those needs. Establishment of policies and strategies for land acquisition, including exactions, easements, leases, and other strategies, in addition to fee‐simple purchase. Establishment of benchmarks and goals for providing services and measure the results of efforts towards meeting these. In 1995, the National Park and Recreation Association published the following classification table. At the time it represented the most recent thinking on classification and standards for parklands and facilities. NRPA has since moved in the direction of GIS mapping of Park and Recreation Lands, The GRASP® methodology is one example of a GIS driven, component‐based system that may be used for both classification and level of service analysis. 70 City of Meridian, Idaho Based on a modified 1995 NRPA Classification System the Meridian Park System would breakdown as follows: Regional Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Settlers Park Community Park Bear Creek Park Heroes Park Storey Park Tully Park Neighborhood Park 8th Street Park Champion Park Chateau Park Gordon Harris Park Renaissance Park Seasons Park Mini‐Park Centennial Park Cox Monument Fire Station No.4 Park Parks and Recreation Master Plan 71 Special Use Park Lakeview Golf Course City Hall Plaza Generations Plaza Heritage Ball Fields Jabil Fields Undeveloped/Future Park Lands Borup/Bottles Properties South Meridian Property William Watson Private Park/Recreation Facility HOA (Various Other Parks) Natural Resource Areas U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Undeveloped School‐Park Andrus Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chaparral Elementary School Chief Joseph Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Crossroads Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Discovery Elementary School Gateway School Heritage Middle School Hunter Elementary School Joplin Elementary School Lake Hazel Elementary School Lake Hazel Middle School Lewis & Clark Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Mary McPherson Elementary School Meridian Elementary School Meridian Middle School Paramount Elementary School Pathways Middle School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Pioneer School of the Arts Ponderosa Elementary School Prospect Elementary School River Valley Elementary School Sawtooth Middle School Siena Elementary School Silver Sage Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Summerwind Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Willow Creek Elementary 72 City of Meridian, Idaho Other Public or Semi‐Public Providers C.F. McDevitt Park Cameron Park Cottonwood Park Fuller Park Meridian Swimming Pool Peppermint Park Settlers Village Park Sycamore Park A good classification system should address such a variety of purposes in ordering park facilities. Classifications must be clear, straightforward, and understandable, especially to agency administrators and staff. Often classification systems are adopted that are ambiguous or use conflicting criteria for defining individual classes of lands and facilities. One example might be a classification system based on both parcel size and uses that occur within a parcel. Planners and administrators often try to do too many things at once within a single scheme. A common failing of classification systems is that they tend to be used based on parcel size rather than a land use basis. Often, a large parcel is owned within which a wide and diverse set of uses is contained, and there is no single classification that encompasses the full range of purposes that the parcel addresses. So a classification is chosen from among the possible choices, but it is not able to describe all of the functions of that parcel. A common alternative is to develop a new classification that fits the parcel, but over time, this leads to too many classifications and becomes unwieldy and less useful for its original purposes. Consider a site that is located in a residential area on 20 or 30 acres that is part wooded area and part developed park, with a playground intended for use by the neighborhood but not much else. This site would be classified a neighborhood park based on use, but a community park based on size. An exception must be made to the standard in order to assign it to one classification or the other. That same park might have a large lawn area that is used for soccer games. The combination of size and use would place it in the community park category, but everyone considers it a neighborhood park because of where it is located and the people it serves. Another exception is made to the standard. Or a new classification is created to address the unique situation. Over time, other unique situations occur, and before long there are too many classifications and/or exceptions and classification system becomes unwieldy. The ambiguity and number of exceptions that the classification scheme creates degrades its effectiveness as a planning tool. Ultimately such a scheme comes to be seen as arbitrary as it is not defensible as a means of justifying decisions. Classifications are of relatively little importance to the general public. A visitor chooses to visit a particular park or facility for the amenities it contains, not based on its classification. A park name that includes its classification, such as Meridian Community Park, may suggest to the potential visitor what amenities it contains, but the choice to visit is still based on the amenities that are actually found there regardless of name or classification. Classifications are most valuable for internal use by an agency. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 73 Use‐ or Function‐Based Level‐of‐Service Classification Another useful classification system is applied on a land‐use basis rather than a parcel basis. To do this, first list the various types of uses found within the agency’s lands and facilities. Sort these into helpful categories that have relevance to the planning, operation, and management of the assets. For example, if sports oriented parks are to be managed differently than neighborhood parks, a clear and understandable definition of what uses constitute a neighborhood park should be developed. Once the use categories are defined, all of the land and facilities owned and managed by an agency should be evaluated to identify which parts of them fall within each of the various classifications. This should be done on a use basis rather than a parcel basis. This means that a sports oriented park may be defined by boundaries that reflect the use, and these boundaries may not necessarily coincide with parcel boundaries (though often they will).These boundaries can be drawn in a GIS system and stored on separate layers from the parcel boundaries. By creating a new layer in the GIS with classifications based on use or functions, the classification system can be used more effectively to measure and manage the assets of the agency. Component‐Based Level‐of‐Service Classification In general, the current Meridian Park Classification System appears to work well with the current inventory. Parks or facilities within each classification fall within reasonable ranges for acres and quantity of GRASP® components. A classification system that combines the current system with the GRASP® component based system would mean only a minor adjustment to this system. The following table characterizes the proposed classification system and offers general description and proposed GRASP® ranges based on current conditions. In this system, the primary focus or intended function of the park or facility dictates the GRASP® level of service. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Pr o p o s e d Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n P r o p o s e d Ge n e r a l De s c r i p t i o n Ge n e r a l De s i g n an d De v e l o p m e n t Gu i d e l i n e s Si z e an d St r e e t Fr o n t a g e Gu i d e l i n e s Pr o p o s e d Un i q u e GR A S P ® Co m p o n e n t Ra n g e ba s e d on Cu r r e n t In v e n t o r y Pr o p o s e d To t a l GR A S P ® Co m p o n e n t Ra n g e ba s e d on Cu r r e n t In v e n t o r y Sp o r t s Pa r k S p o r t or i e n t e d fa c i l i t y . Ap p r o p r i a t e co m p o n e n t s ma y va r y ba s e d on us e . Ty p i c a l Co m f o r t an d Co n v e n i e n c e Am e n i t i e s (P i c n i c ta b l e s , be n c h e s , bi k e ra c k s , dr i n k i n g fo u n t a i n s , re s t r o o m , et c ) Va r i e s by us e St r e e t fr o n t a g e my va r y by us e an d si z e Va r i e s V a r i e s Sp e c i a l Us e Pa r k Co v e r s a br o a d ra n g e of pa r k s an d re c r e a t i o n a l fa c i l i t i e s or i e n t e d to w a r d si n g l e ‐pu r p o s e us e , li m i t e d , is o l a t e d or un i q u e re c r e a t i o n a l ne e d s . Ap p r o p r i a t e co m p o n e n t s ma y va r y ba s e d on us e . Ty p i c a l Co m f o r t an d Co n v e n i e n c e Am e n i t i e s (P i c n i c ta b l e s , be n c h e s , bi k e ra c k s , dr i n k i n g fo u n t a i n s , re s t r o o m , et c ) Va r i e s by us e St r e e t fr o n t a g e my va r y by us e an d si z e Va r i e s V a r i e s 15 to 30 ac r e s ba s e d on cu r r e n t in v e n t o r y Vi s i b l e fr o m ad j o i n i n g st r e e t an d st r e e t fr o n t a g e on at le a s t tw o si d e s wi t h 40 0 fe e t mi n i m u m 7 to 98 to 15 Ne i g h b o r h o o d Pa r k Th e ba s i c un i t of th e pa r k sy s t e m an d se r v e s as th e re c r e a t i o n a l an d so c i a l fo c u s of th e ne i g h b o r h o o d . Le v e l of se r v i c e is pr i m a r i l y pr o v i d e d to i n d i v i d u a l , fa m i l i e s an d sm a l l gr o u p s th r o u g h un i q u e co m p o n e n t s . Ge n e r a l l y se r v e s re s i d e n t s wi t h i n 1/ 2 mi l e wa l k i n g di s t a n c e up to on e mi l e an d li m i t e d on ‐si t e pa r k i n g pr o v i d e d . Ap p r o p r i a t e co m p o n e n t s ma y in c l u d e bu t no t be li m i t e d to : Lo c a l Pl a y g r o u n d Op e n Tu r f Sh e l t e r Ba s k e t b a l l or Ot h e r Co u r t Ga m e Lo o p Wa l k Pu b l i c Ar t Ty p i c a l Co m f o r t an d Co n v e n i e n c e Am e n i t i e s (P i c n i c ta b l e s , be n c h e s , bi k e ra c k s , dr i n k i n g fo u n t a i n s , re s t r o o m , et c ) .5 to 11 ac r e s ba s e d on cu r r e n t in v e n t o r y (C i t y St a n d a r d Si z e is 7 ac r e s ) Vi s i b l e fr o m ad j o i n i n g st r e e t an d 20 0 fe e t of st r e e t fr o n t a g e 5 to 64 . 5 to 6 Re g i o n a l Pa r k (L a r g e Ur b a n Pa r k ) Se r v e a br o a d pu r p o s e to th e c o m m u n i t y an d re g i o n wh i l e st i l l pr o v i d i n g ad e q u a t e ne i g h b o r h o o d le v e l of se r v i c e to ad j a c e n t re s i d e n t s . Fo c u s is on co m p o n e n t s th a t oc c u r in qu a n t i t i e s , si z e an d de s i g n to se r v e la r g e gr o u p s or c o m m u n i t y wi d e ev e n t s . Ma y se r v e us e r s fr o m ac r o s s ci t y or re g i o n . Be c a u s e of se r v i c e ar e a re q u i r e s ad e q u a t e pa r k i n g fa c i l i t i e s . Ap p r o p r i a t e co m p o n e n t s ma y in c l u d e bu t no t be li m i t e d to : De s t i n a t i o n Pl a y g r o u n d Do g Pa r k Sp o r t s Fi e l d s Sp l a s h Pa d s Ev e n t Sp a c e Op e n Tu r f Sh e l t e r Ba s k e t b a l l , Te n n i s , Pi c k l e b a l l , et c . Lo o p Wa l k Pu b l i c Ar t Ty p i c a l Co m f o r t an d Co n v e n i e n c e Am e n i t i e s (P i c n i c ta b l e s , be n c h e s , bi k e ra c k s , dr i n k i n g fo u n t a i n s , re s t r o o m , et c ) 50 + ac r e s ba s e d on cu r r e n t in v e n t o r y Fu l l ac c e s s on at le a s t tw o si d e s of pa r k . At le a s t on e si d e of th e pa r k sh o u l d ha v e ac c e s s fr o m a co l l e c t o r or ar t e r i a l st r e e t . 15 to 21 3 9 + Co m m u n i t y Pa r k Se r v e a br o a d pu r p o s e to th e c o m m u n i t y wh i l e st i l l pr o v i d i n g ad e q u a t e ne i g h b o r h o o d le v e l of se r v i c e to ad j a c e n t re s i d e n t s . Fo c u s is on co m p o n e n t s th a t oc c u r in qu a n t i t i e s , si z e an d de s i g n to se r v e la r g e gr o u p s or c o m m u n i t y wi d e ev e n t s . Ge n e r a l l y se r v e s us e r s wi t h i n 1 ‐3 mi l e ra d i u s . Re q u i r e s ad e q u a t e pa r k i n g to mi n i m i z e ne i g h b o r h o o d co n f l i c t . Ap p r o p r i a t e co m p o n e n t s ma y in c l u d e bu t no t be li m i t e d to : De s t i n a t i o n Pl a y g r o u n d Do g Pa r k Sp o r t s Fi e l d s Op e n Tu r f Sh e l t e r Ba s k e t b a l l or Ot h e r Co u r t s Lo o p Wa l k Pu b l i c Ar t Ty p i c a l Co m f o r t an d Co n v e n i e n c e Am e n i t i e s (P i c n i c ta b l e s , be n c h e s , bi k e ra c k s , dr i n k i n g fo u n t a i n s , re s t r o o m , et c ) Ba s e d on ex i s t i n g co n d i t i o n s , th e cu r r e n t pa r k s wo u l d fa l l in t o th e fo l l o w i n g cl a s s i f i c a t i o n s . Pr o p o s e d Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n L o c a t i o n Cu r r e n t Nu m b e r of Un i q u e GR A S P ® Co m p o n e n t s Cu r r e n t Nu m b e r of To t a l GR A S P ® Co m p o n e n t s GI S Ac r e s Ju l i u s M. Kl e i n e r Pa r k 2 1 3 9 . 5 5 7 . 9 9 2 1 Se t t l e r s Pa r k 1 5 5 5 5 6 . 1 2 3 1 Be a r Cr e e k Pa r k 7 8 1 8 . 8 0 1 9 He r o e s Pa r k 9 1 5 3 0 . 1 5 0 1 St o r e y Pa r k 7 1 1 1 7 . 9 0 4 3 Tu l l y Pa r k 7 9 1 8 . 4 7 7 8 8t h St r e e t Pa r k 3 3 2 . 7 8 2 9 Ce n t e n n i a l Pa r k 5 4 . 5 0 . 4 5 2 0 Ch a m p i o n Pa r k 5 5 5 . 9 8 3 0 Ch a t e a u Pa r k 6 6 6 . 7 1 6 3 Go r d o n Ha r r i s Pa r k 5 5 1 1 . 1 3 7 0 Re n a i s s a n c e Pa r k 5 5 6 . 5 2 6 4 Se a s o n s Pa r k 6 6 6 . 9 5 3 3 Ci t y Ha l l Pl a z a 5 5 0 . 9 2 7 9 Co x Mo n u m e n t 3 3 0 . 1 0 8 2 Fi r e St a t i o n No . 4 Pa r k 1 1 0 . 5 9 0 6 Ge n e r a t i o n s Pl a z a 3 3 0 . 2 4 7 8 La k e v i e w Go l f Co u r s e 2 2 1 1 9 . 4 2 6 3 He r i t a g e Ba l l Fi e l d s 3 8 2 2 . 6 8 6 0 Ja b i l Fi e l d s 1 2 8 . 3 9 8 0 Sp e c i a l Us e Pa r k Ne i g h b o r h o o d Pa r k Sp o r t s Pa r k Re g i o n a l Pa r k (L a r g e Ur b a n Pa r k ) Co m m u n i t y Pa r k E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s Parks and Recreation Master Plan 79 G. Urban Forestry Management Plan Introduction Urban Forest Overview This chapter is intended as a beginning to formal planning for Meridian’s urban forest, a summary of data, and strategic objectives that will serve as a springboard to more detailed planning efforts in the future. There are currently 5,000 trees in 255 acres of City parks, the golf course, and other parcels of land owned and/or maintained by the City of Meridian. Per the objectives of the comprehensive plan, developed park land is expected to increase by an additional 206 acres by 2025. This translates to an Urban Forest of around 7,000 trees. Based on the Treasure Valley Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) Assessment (full report can be found at: http://www.tvcanopy.net/resources/) completed in 2013, the City of Meridian has a seven percent urban tree canopy that provides a multitude of ecosystem benefits annually to the citizens of the City, including: Stormwater: 8.6 million gallons, a value of $76,400 in mitigated stormwater infrastructure costs Air Quality: 40.6 tons for a value of $513,000 in reduced adverse human health impacts Energy Conservation: $140,400 in reduced summer cooling costs through shading of residential homes Urban Forest Stakeholders Proper care of existing trees and growth of the urban forest for community benefit will involve participation by the following stakeholders: City of Meridian Departments Meridian Development Corporation (MDC) The City Partners with MDC for construction of the downtown tree planter box replacements, as well as sharing costs for the construction of new boxes driven by new development. Ada County Highway District (ACHD) The City has a Memorandum of Understanding with the Ada County Highway District wherein the city maintains the tree boxes and the trees, mitigates for sidewalk trip hazards, and shares cost with ACHD on some sidewalk and curb repairs related to trees in public rights‐of‐way in the downtown core geographic area. 80 City of Meridian, Idaho West ADA School District (WASD) The City partners with the West Ada School District each year to host an Arbor Day celebration. Additional efforts, both present and future, will include the planting and maintenance of trees on WASD property. Idaho Power Company (IPC) The City currently partners with Idaho Power Company to host the annual tree distribution events for the Treasure Valley Shade Tree Project (http://www.tvcanopy.net/treasure‐valley‐ shade‐trees/). Trees are then planted on private property in locations determined to help reduce future energy costs by providing shade for homes and buildings. Idaho Department of Lands (IDL) The Idaho Department of Lands partners with the City to host an annual Arbor Day Celebration. They also provide grants to help fund Arbor Day Celebrations. Treasure Valley Canopy Network (TVCN) The City partners with the Treasure Valley Canopy Network on a number of initiatives that have an impact on water quality, air quality, energy conservation, and overall community enhancement through strategic investment in community infrastructure (www.tvcanopy.net). Others Landscape architects and design professionals Local nurseries Neighborhood groups Community volunteers and citizens Downtown business owners Developers who plan to build or renovate downtown Importance of the Urban Forest to Meridian and Treasure Valley Communities The benefits of trees to an urban environment are varied and significant. These include: Energy savings/passive energy conservation achieved by the shading of homes and paved surfaces Shade, for the health, safety, and comfort of people who use parks and public areas Mitigation of urban heat island effect Air cleaning and purification, removal of CO2, SO2, and other airborne pollutants Reduction of storm water runoff and soil erosion Filtering and purification of groundwater by directly absorbing pollutants Aesthetic enhancement and potential increased property values Function as wind and sound breaks Screening of unsightly urban infrastructure or for privacy Provide valuable wildlife habitat and migration corridors Parks and Recreation Master Plan 81 Meridian is a Tree City USA This is a national designation that requires participating cities to: 1. Establish a Tree Board/Commission or Urban Forestry Department 2. Enact a Tree Care Ordinance as part of the local code 3. Maintain a Community Forestry Program with an annual budget of at least $2 per capita 4. Observe Arbor Day and issue an Official Proclamation Value that Grows with Time Unlike other kinds of public infrastructure that require more maintenance with age and eventual renovation or replacement, the value of a healthy tree increases over time. Considered together, the trees that comprise the City’s urban forest are a critical community asset, the value of which is often underrated. Current Structure of Urban Forestry Department Department Staff City Arborist The Urban Forestry Division currently has one full‐time dedicated staff member, the City Arborist, who oversees all operations. This position was established in 2011. Seasonal Labor Because additional labor is needed to maintain the current standard of service, a six‐month seasonal position was added for the first time in 2015. Eight hours per week of this staff person’s labor was applied to the work needs of other departments. In 2016, that need is expected to increase to one 8‐month seasonal employee. Annual Operating Budget Urban Forestry budget is included in the Park Department maintenance budget. Total expenditures for 2014 $ 186,665* Estimated expenditures for 2015 $ 195,165 *This is a comprehensive number that includes labor expense and all direct and peripheral costs related to forestry operations. Maintenance Overview Meridian’s Urban Forestry Division cares for all trees in Meridian City parks, including the golf course and street trees in the downtown core. Forestry Department Responsibilities: Maintenance of trees within city parks and the park system at large This includes coordination with the Planning Department on tree mitigation for development sites, planning for future park development, tree inventory and management, tree maintenance, pruning cycles, new plantings, removals, replacements, fertilization, pest and disease controls, and risk assessments. 82 City of Meridian, Idaho Maintenance and management of the Kleiner Park arboretum The level of maintenance required by the arboretum is higher and more specialized than standard tree maintenance levels within the parks system at large. Maintenance Contracts with Outside Vendors Meridian City administers maintenance contracts for downtown street trees and selected trees on park properties. Outside vendors must be Certified Arborists with the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Only Certified Arborists may perform work. Contractor must follow ANSI standards and use best management practices. Meet other requirements by the City for outside vendors. Annual contracted amounts vary, depending on which park or area is being pruned or added to the budget for the coming year. Large trees requiring specialized equipment are pruned on a five‐year cycle by contract. Smaller trees are pruned by forestry staff on an as‐needed yearly or bi‐yearly basis, or five‐year cycle. As a standard practice, forestry staff will raise all tree limbs for clearance over sidewalks, pathways, and all other park areas each year as needed. Downtown Trees/Public Rights‐of‐Way Current care of trees within public rights‐of‐way involves cooperation between ACHD, the City of Meridian, and the Meridian Development Corporation. Meridian Parks and Recreation bears ultimate responsibility for management of urban street trees in the downtown core area. It is imperative that: All agencies and organizations with jurisdiction hold to the same standards for tree planting, care, and maintenance. All agencies work together to set priorities for how to achieve and maintain these standards. Challenges Specific to Downtown Trees The following should be considered when planning for maintenance of downtown trees and other trees in urban settings: Tree species within the downtown are less diverse than elsewhere in park system. Trees in the downtown tend to be shorter lived, with replacement occurring on a 10‐15 year cycle, depending on site evaluation related to hardscape or irrigation damage by tree roots. Drainage can be an issue within or adjacent to existing tree boxes. Lack of existing Green Stormwater Infrastructure/Silva Cells, to help with drainage and encourage root growth and development. H. Strategic Goals for Meridian Urban Forestry General Overview To keep pace with recent growth in the area, it is important that Meridian Urban Forestry define a clear vision for the future, as well as mechanisms for operation that will ensure a smooth transition in anticipation of future leadership changes. The following strategic goals have been identified for the continued health and sustainable future growth of our Meridian’s urban forest. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 83 1. Establish a Vision for Meridian Urban Forestry Urban Forestry shall continue to provide a high level of service to the community by responding to tree related calls from the public and retain its current operating model of caring for all park trees; providing review and comment on development applications as they relate to mitigation, plantings on City owned property and in the downtown core area; and maintaining the current tree inventory. 2. Strengthen Approach to Management of the Urban Forest Staff will complete the ongoing GIS inventory and formalize as a comprehensive data set for use as a management tool. Additional staff training will be required with implementation to maximize efficiency. GIS software updates and yearly technical support is ongoing to provide what is needed to manage urban forestry. 3. Evaluate Impacts of the Projected Park System Expansion on Urban Forestry An understanding of the impacts of growth to maintenance of the urban forest will allow the City to maintain its current high level of service. It is recommended that annual assessments be conducted during the budget development process to determine needs for additional staff and equipment so as to achieve alignment with the overall master plan. 4. Guarantee the Present and Future Health of the Urban Forest The City Arborist will work to further the health and longevity of the urban forest through diversification of tree species and age, anticipation of pests and other potential threats, and implementation of standards for planting and tree selection. Staff shall also seek continuing education on urban forestry trends, including the effects of climate change as related to forest health. 5. Maintain and Promote the Kleiner Arboretum as a Community Asset Develop a strategic management plan to guide future expansion, ensure adequate maintenance resources, and create greater awareness of the arboretum within the local and regional communities. 6. Preserve Strong Relationship with the Community/Seek Additional Opportunities for Education and Outreach Continue to work with the community in support of tree‐related issues, while seeking additional opportunities to partner with other agencies, educate community members on the urban forest, and increase awareness of its value to our community. 7. Revise City Policy as Necessary to Strengthen Urban Forestry Periodically review and update the City ordinance to reflect changes in the field of Urban Forestry or updates resulting from legal action in America. Updates may address changes to terms, definitions, best practices, or other considerations, as required to stay current with the industry. 84 City of Meridian, Idaho 8. Continue to Offer and Develop Special Programs Related to Community Forestry Continue to offer and develop new programs that benefit the community and increase awareness of Urban Forestry. As programs are initiated, seek community participation first and then employ the City budgeting process to determine staffing and funding implications. I. Existing Urban Forest Data GIS Tree Inventory A comprehensive in‐house GIS inventory by City staff of all trees maintained by the City is ongoing, with completion expected in early 2016. Data for each tree that will be included in this inventory: Planting Date/Year Planted Caliper Inches Location Condition Rating Species Cultivar Canopy Cover Pests, Diseases, Cultural Problems Structural Issues Photographs Value Assessments Work Order History Application to Forest Management It is intended that the resulting complex data profile of the urban forest will function as a management tool that can be finely tuned to the needs of the Department. Once data is fully compiled, layers can be manipulated and various attributes selected to generate current snapshots of such parameters as tree condition, age distribution, or pruning history. For example, see Figure 14 which shows the current tree condition. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 85 Figure 15: Sample Data Chart Generated in GIS Using Data from Current Tree Inventory Beyond analysis, this information can assist trained forestry staff with: Budget projections Prioritization of needed improvements and maintenance Creation of work plans Trends and forecasting of emerging forestry issues that may threaten tree health Generation of urban forest cost‐benefits analysis Need for Additional Training Due to the complexity of the GIS database, urban forestry staff will require additional training in GIS and urban forestry‐specific software in order to achieve maximum results from manipulation of the data set. Training should also be provided with regard to use of GIS interface devices in the field so that staff can keep the inventory current as new trees are planted, moved, and removed. It is recommended that any future candidates for the City Arborist position have urban forestry management experience using the above tools and software. 86 City of Meridian, Idaho Management Schedule As it is difficult to predict not only the rate at which growth will occur, but also the form it will take, a standards‐based approach is recommended over more prescriptive methods. This allows a threshold‐ driven mechanism for department growth that will adjust for the changing demands of a growing system. If standards of service are well‐defined, funding and resources may be more readily allocated, as necessary, toward achieving and maintaining those standards. Tree Pruning Overview and General Guidelines Pruning of all park trees shall take place on a five‐year rotation based on need, except where immediate pruning is required for reasons of public safety. The City Arborist will determine all trees in need of pruning. Pruning shall take place on a five‐year rotation during the off‐season to avoid conflicts with park users that might compromise public safety. Pruning of larger trees will be determined based on growth and will be contract pruned, also on the five‐year rotation, or as needed. The City shall create and maintain an approved list of tree contractors. All contractors will be required to comply with the universally accepted ANSI (American Nurseryman Standards Institute) and ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) standards. Trees shall be monitored for poor health or stress when conditions manifest that could cause deterioration, particularly after unusual weather events, such as freezing, flooding, high winds, or due to insect infestation. In such cases, the City Arborist or other qualified staff shall be consulted to determine appropriate course of action and timing. Tree Pruning Schedule and Approach Trees are currently pruned on an established five‐year rotation that includes a mix of contracted services and pruning by Department staff. Forestry staff of Meridian Parks and Recreation will perform all pruning that can be accomplished from the ground. The City does not currently own lift trucks or major pruning equipment. When other needs arise, like pruning for larger trees and/or large tree and stump removals, this work shall be done by local tree contractors. City Council generally endorses the sharing of this work with local contractors and feels it is mutually beneficial to the City and community. The City Arborist has established a 10‐year pruning schedule based on a five‐year rotation cycle, available under separate cover, available from the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 87 Equipment – for Tree Pruning and Maintenance Department‐owned equipment includes: Chain saws Pruning equipment Hand tools Trucks Loading equipment As the urban forest grows, additional equipment may be required should the Parks and Recreation Department decide to accomplish a larger scope of work in‐house, beyond currently established practices. Staffing Implications of Urban Forest Growth While it is recommended that staff levels be adjusted as necessary to maintain the current standards of service, it is useful to assess current FTE hours in relation to the size of the urban forest so as to forecast potential future staffing needs. Additional Recommendations Beyond the scope of this chapter, the following action items are recommended to continue to enhance the Urban Forestry Division and the level of service it provides. 1. Undertake Additional Forestry‐Specific Strategic Planning The following suggested management and master plans may be funded and commissioned as consultant‐led efforts, or performed in‐house, depending on staff availability and expertise. The following is a list of future planning efforts that should be considered to further the efficiency and long‐term success of the Urban Forestry Division. Urban Forest Management Plan This plan will build on this chapter, as well as data collected as part of the GIS inventory of park system trees. As an option, this planning effort could begin in‐house, using a standard template from a similar plan, as supplemented by the expertise of managers and future managers. Arboretum Management and Master Plan Input from an arboretum design specialist was sought at the inception of the Kleiner Park Arboretum. Preliminary plan documentation is shown in Figure 15. 88 City of Meridian, Idaho Figure 16: Working Plan of Kleiner Arboretum Additional planning for the arboretum is needed to address recommendations for growth, marketing to increase awareness of this little‐known community asset, and suggestions for enhancing the visitor experience for greater interactivity. Comprehensive Manual of Planting Details & Guidelines This effort would enhance health of the urban forest by standardizing size and detailing of planting areas, requirements for stormwater accommodation, and tree selection to suit site context and plant cultural requirements, as well as minimizing long‐term maintenance. Management Plan to Address Risks Posed by Eastern Ash Borer (EAB) It is recommended that this plan be proactively completed and implementation begun prior to appearance of the Eastern Ash Borer. Arrival of this insect pest is anticipated in ten years, or around 2025. Urban Forest Cost‐Benefits Analysis A comprehensive cost‐benefit analysis or Meridian’s Urban Forest could help to quantify net community benefit in terms of: Improvements to air quality Carbon sequestration Reduction in energy consumption Percentage of park canopy cover Asset value Parks and Recreation Master Plan 89 2. Institute a Tree Board or Urban Forest Advisory Council The Meridian Parks Commission currently acts as an advisory body to the Urban Forestry component of Meridian Parks and Recreation. It has been active since the adoption of the local Tree Ordinance in 2002. In the future, it may be appropriate to institute an advisory council devoted solely to Urban Forestry. It is recommended that the City Arborist provide a quarterly update to the Meridian Parks Commission, or acting advisory council. In addition to reporting, these interactions should include training relative to the Commission’s responsibilities in Urban Forestry matters, and alert them to common situations and issues that may arise. Beyond education, frequent communication also helps to bridge any potential gaps in continuity due to council turnover. A key current responsibility of the Parks and Recreation Commission includes hearing public appeals to decisions made by the City Arborist. In such instances, the Commission’s ruling is sent to City Council for final approval. Duties of the existing Parks Commission may also include: Supporting the planning process for and implementation of a future Urban Forest Management Plan. Public education related to the importance of trees and the urban forest. Funding assistance with regards to grant applications, solicitation of private donations, and facilitation of public‐private partnerships. 3. Ongoing Staff Training to Stay Current in the Industry It is recommended that the Urban Forestry Division seek opportunities for continuing education to stay current with changes that may occur within the field of urban forestry. In addition, managers should seek and/or provide staff training: To groundskeepers and forestry assistants with specialized experience relative to tree pruning, especially with regard to the Kleiner Arboretum and other specialized landscapes. On forestry‐specific GIS software used as an urban forest management tool. As needed to respond to growth and changing conditions. 4. Take a More Active Role in Construction Management It is recommended that qualified forestry staff inspect the installation of trees on future park properties and rights‐of‐way the City will be responsible for maintaining. Summary The urban forest, when well‐managed, diverse, and healthy, provides generous benefits to a community. Trees beautify landscapes and streetscapes, improve the health of environments, and enhance the user experience of parks and public spaces by providing shade and relief from summer heat. Beyond health and comfort, this shade can mitigate for “heat islands” created by increased urbanization, and offer passive cooling of homes and buildings that results in energy savings. 90 City of Meridian, Idaho Unlike some components of the built environment whose values depreciate over time, the urban forest is a living system whose value only increases with the passing years. Successful long‐term management of the urban forest must not only consider trees, but also site conditions and infrastructure components and their relationship to the overall health of the system. It is also important to generate awareness of the benefits provided by the urban forest. The more the local community is educated on the value of the forest over time, the greater the investment in the forest, not only by professionals and managers of public lands, but by individual property owners, each contributing to the vitality and longevity of the whole. J. Pathways Assessment & Recommendations Introduction This section is intended as an update to the Meridian Pathways Master Plan (Adopted in 2007 and previously amended in January of 2010) and a tool to further aid in the implementation of that plan. It does not suggest any significant changes to proposed expansion of the pathway system as outlined in the original plan, but rather seeks to accomplish the following objectives: Quantify the impacts of pathway system expansion in terms of cost for ongoing maintenance, given the significant proposed increase to pathway mileage at plan build‐out. Establish guidelines for what portion of the pathway system is appropriate and sustainable for the City to maintain. Establish City priorities for near‐term pathway implementation that will have the greatest impact on connectivity. Propose changes to existing policy that will facilitate ongoing expansion and designate maintenance responsibilities so as to meet the needs of the City, the development community, and other stakeholders. Pathway System Overview The current breakdown of Meridian’s existing pathways, by type, is as follows: 14.8 miles of pathways currently maintained by the City 7.9 miles in parks 6.9 miles along canals and other areas 14 miles (approximately) maintained by HOAs and other entities 28.8 Miles of Total Developed Pathways Per the existing pathways plan, an additional 104.2 miles have been identified for development. This amounts to a total projected mileage at build out of 133 miles. Importance of Pathways/Need Pathways make communities more livable by helping to reduce reliance on the automobile. This has the potential to improve the environment and mitigate for traffic congestion. Additionally, pathways provide ongoing opportunities for physical activity to promote physical and mental health. Beyond connecting people to places, pathways also provide ongoing opportunities to be out and about that connect us interpersonally as well. Per Dave Peterson, Design Concepts Numbers per Meridian Pathways Master Plan, current mileage updates per Jay Gibbons Parks and Recreation Master Plan 91 Need Throughout the needs assessment and outreach phase of this planning effort, community members consistently rated pathways as a high priority when given opportunity to comment via stakeholder group, survey, or public meeting. This reflects a national trend wherein pathways are increasingly important to communities. While Meridian has identified a pathway system for development that will ultimately prove extensive, connectivity among currently built pathways continues to be a challenge. Some of this is due to existing major roadways and other potential barriers to pedestrian traffic, but also existing development that occurred before pedestrian connections were required as part of the approvals process. Stakeholders who own linear properties along existing waterways that cut through the City are also key to enhancing the overall connectivity of the pathway system. Stakeholders Irrigation Districts Nampa‐Meridian Irrigation District – Major Stakeholder. Settlers Irrigation District – Fewer land holdings in Meridian. West Ada School District History of successfully partnering with the school district. Joint use of school facilities plays a key role in filling recreation demand for ball fields and active recreation facilities. School properties are important when it comes to making connections, and offer opportunities for safer crossings and connections, further off (or outside of) public rights‐of‐way. Developers Homeowners’ Associations (HOAs) City of Meridian – Building Department Railroads Potential for sharing existing rights‐of‐way that can achieve connection on a more regional level. Progress Update/Policies Implemented Since adoption of the original Meridian Pathways Master Plan, significant progress has been made toward implementation. Much of this has focused on the establishment of policy and planning practices around pathway development that will lay the groundwork for greater connectivity moving forward. 92 City of Meridian, Idaho Policy and Procedural Improvements Achieved Since Approval of Original Plan Entitlements process for development now requires dedicated easements for pathways and pedestrian connections. Plan review for all new development must be routed through the Pathways Project Manager for design input and approval, in addition to other departments as required. Developers are required to provide better documentation of construction standards/as‐builts for pathways that may later be deeded to the City. Standard Specifications and Notes for pathway construction have been developed (in conjunction with Meridian Public Works)—similar to a performance specification. Pathway entitlement is no longer a part of the Development Agreement. Expectation has been established among developers that working with the City to provide pathway connections will be a standard project requirement. The City has seen improved cooperation and general acknowledgement from the development community that pathways benefit and add value to their final product. Opportunities/Recommendations Maintain a Regional Perspective Emphasize the need to look beyond Meridian to neighboring communities and think in terms of regional connections to Boise River Greenbelt, Eagle, Nampa, Caldwell, Star, and Kuna. Consider Meridian’s system as it relates to a regional pathway system. The pending acquisition of Margaret Aldape Park presents an opportunity for Meridian to connect to the Boise River Greenbelt system. This will provide connection to the rest of the Treasure Valley on a regional level. Schools Use proximity to schools, when possible, and take advantage of existing signaled crossings in school zones. Provide pedestrian connections between all schools and pathway system. Safe Routes to Schools have already been mapped. Examine these in greater detail and adjust as necessary. Find/create connections between multi‐use pathways and schools. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 93 Subdivision Development Continue to work with developers to dedicate pathway easements and make strong pedestrian connections. Pedestrian connections shall be identified and preserved prior to development. Coordinate with developers during the entitlements process to allow alternative routes through developments, regardless of ditch or waterway location (if applicable). Existing Rights‐of‐Way Where pathways must be integrated with public rights‐of‐way, revise street sections to provide for wider sidewalks and greater separation from major roadways, if possible. As‐Builts and Documentation The Building Department shall notify the Parks & Pathways Project Manager of all pathways, once built. Institute mechanisms for better post‐construction reporting and documentation. Key Stakeholders for Pathway Implementation In recent years, the City has made significant progress in terms of policy to further development of the pathway system as pertains to involvement by other property owners and stakeholders. This momentum must continue, and relationships further developed, with the following key stakeholders. Irrigation Districts Due to the linear nature of waterways, Irrigation Districts (especially Nampa‐Meridian) are key to advancing connectivity of the Meridian pathways plan. It is imperative that the City continues to partner with irrigation districts relative to the following challenges: Pathway development along existing canals, irrigation ditches, and laterals needs to be addressed at a more comprehensive level. Crossings present a special difficulty in that many waterways do not emerge at intersections where pedestrian crossings exist and are safely articulated. For example, it is not acceptable for pathways to emerge at the edge of a 45 mph collector road with minimal shoulder and no proximity to an intersection for safe crossing. In the past, irrigation districts have refused pathway proposals prior to any constructive discussion regarding their development. Both parties now have a history of working together and must continue to fine‐tune this partnership as each new pathway segment is implemented. Developers Residential and commercial developments present challenges when it comes to providing pathway easements. The City must work closely with developers during the planning phases, as it can be prohibitive to accomplish these connections after the fact. 94 City of Meridian, Idaho Implementation Priorities Because so many miles of pathway have been identified for development per the Pathways Master Plan, it is recommended that City resources focus on implementation and maintenance of the following major components of the system. Once a strong framework is established, users will enjoy greater connectivity, and secondary pathways can then tie into and expand the reach of the overall system. The following pathways have been identified as high priorities for CIP and maintenance funds. This is intended as a general guideline for resource allocation by the City, as timing and location of private development may catalyze construction of lower priority pathways by others. High Priority Pathways Existing Proposed Total Five‐Mile Creek Pathway 2.37 8.64 11.01 miles Ten‐Mile Creek Pathway 2.03 9.00 11.03 miles Rail‐with‐Trail 0 8.08 8.08 miles TOTAL PROPOSED 30.18 Miles Regional Impact of Rail‐with‐Trail This proposed pathway will have a significant impact on regional connectivity, as it will encompass a 22‐ mile right of way, with eight of those miles passing through the City of Meridian. The combination Rail‐ with‐Trail section, as proposed, will run between the historic railroad depots in Boise and Nampa. Because development of this pathway will deliver considerable benefits to Boise, Nampa, and others, in addition to Meridian, implementation of this pathway will require a co‐operative effort from all municipalities affected, acting as regional partners, with help from COMPASS and other local agencies and organizations. All Other Proposed Pathways It is anticipated that implementation of this pathway will be driven largely by private developers, with ongoing maintenance provided by Homeowners’ Associations. Implementation Costs for Plan Build‐Out Even with a mandate to focus resources on the development of a few high‐priority segments, cost to construct these pathways will be considerable. At the time of this plan, construction cost for a 10’ wide asphalt path was approximately $36 per lineal foot, or $190,080 per mile. For estimating purposes, this figure includes base material and preparation, as well as asphalt paving, but no administrative or design costs associated with construction. Pathways have been identified as a major priority for the City of Meridian, but given the demands on public funds for other recreational facilities, the cost for build‐out of the pathway system must necessarily be considered within a greater funding context and borne, in large part, by private sector development. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 95 Pathway Maintenance and Operations Implications of System Expansion on Maintenance With growth in recent years, the City has taken advantage of opportunities to develop pathway connections through proposed developments. Verbiage around these development agreements continues to evolve, but in the past, situations have arisen in which the City has been deeded ownership (and associated maintenance) of a pathway not constructed to City standards. It is essential to establish mechanisms for construction documentation of pathways that will guarantee new segments are built to City standards, not only to ensure public safety, but to also minimize maintenance impacts over time. Need for Shared Responsibility As time goes on, even with high standards for construction, the pathway system will grow beyond the ability of the City to maintain it. Ultimate responsibility for maintenance of the pathway system must be shared between the City and private landowners (often Homeowners’ associations). It is recommended that the City transition to requiring that maintenance of future pathways implemented as part of subdivision developments be borne by private stakeholders. Linear Rights‐of‐Way/Canal Pathways Irrigation district requirements for pathway development: City acts as single point of contact City must maintain pathway segments or coordinate maintenance with private sector/HOAs City must enforce irrigation district requirements with other parties Individual licensing agreement recommendations: Require HOAs to maintain pathways, in perpetuity, to standards for safe public use and established landscape aesthetics Incorporate strong wording in these agreements to make clear to private developers that the City will no longer assume long‐term maintenance of pathways. Shall institute mechanisms for enforcement and oversight. Replacement Cycle for Paved Pathways Clear delineation of maintenance responsibility is a necessity, owing to the limited life span of asphalt pavement (30 years on average). In order for pathways to remain safe and well‐maintained as the system ages, a portion of paved pathway segments will require periodic re‐paving on an ongoing basis. In other words, similar to the way City trees are pruned on a 5‐year cycle, so must pathways be resurfaced on a periodic maintenance rotation. Life Cycle Repaving Costs Assuming a total pathway system comprised of 133 miles of pathway that require re‐paving every 30 years, estimated minimum cost to repave the entire system is as follows: 133 miles of pathway x $142,560/mile = $18.9 million every 30 years or = $632,000 annually 96 City of Meridian, Idaho Additional pathways proposed in the Master Plan are desired by the community and essential to the ultimate success of the plan. However, because this increased mileage carries significant cost implications, maintenance of the system in its entirety will ultimately lie beyond the resources of the City. Assumptions: Unit cost to repave is calculated at $27 per lineal foot or $142,560 per mile for a 10‐foot wide asphalt pathway. Average lifespan of pathway segment is 30 years. Priority pathways include: Five Mile Creek Pathway Ten Mile Creek Pathway Rail‐With‐Trail Relevant Studies and Planning Efforts The following studies, completed since the Pathways Master Plan (adopted 2007; amended 2010, 2012) should be considered relative to the existing plan and recommendations contained in this chapter. Arterial Crossing Study Union Pacific Railroad/Rail with Trail Study (January 2015) Destination Downtown Information gathering and updates to downtown streetscapes Includes detailed pavement sections, also standard notes and specifications Summary Significant progress has been made toward implementation of the current Pathways Master Plan. Because connectivity continues to be a challenge, it is recommended that the City focus implementation efforts on a few priority pathways. Cost Comparison for Repaving the Total Pathway Network vs. Priority Pathways Only Total Total Cost to Mileage Repave at Build Out Total Pathway Network 133 $632,016 annually Priority Pathways Only 30 $143,130 annually Parks and Recreation Master Plan 97 Beyond that, given the extent of the proposed system and an understanding of the projected costs for build‐out and ongoing maintenance, it becomes clear that these demands will, over time, exceed the resources of the City. Moving forward, it will be crucial to shift some of the construction burden to private developers, who will typically retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for these pathways, so they may better contribute to the sustainability and success of the overall system. K. Summary of Planning Process for Conceptual Park Master Plans Project Team Visioning Preliminary design efforts for the three undeveloped park properties began with a project team discussion of potential opportunities for each park. These ideas were then summarized in a series of concept statements. The summarized statements described a vision for each of the three regional parks, not only in terms of the type and number of amenities that might be included, but also suggested ideas for keying into contextual, historical, or other elements specific to each park, with the goal to reinforce a strong sense of place and establish each as a unique destination within the Meridian Parks and Recreation system. Concept Narratives South Meridian Regional Park (77‐Acre Property) This park will be devoted to active recreation, similar to a Settlers Park, with theming and design elements that will reinforce a unique identity for a south Meridian regional park. A destination softball complex, illuminated for nighttime play and with the capacity to host area tournaments, will be part of this identity. Theming elements may include: planting design to evoke the native sage land area to the north (for non‐irrigated turf areas), and also integrated art works to tie into local history and culture. West Meridian Regional Park (Borup‐Bottles Property – 47 acres) The Borup‐Bottles property is envisioned as a smaller‐scale regional park with primarily active recreation facilities similar in size and scope to the existing Heroes Park. The recent needs assessment conducted as part of the Comprehensive Parks & Recreation Master Planning effort determined that rodeo facilities, while important to some, are no longer appropriate for the City to offer and will not be included in this park master plan. It is suggested that theming elements, art, architecture, and other design materials for this park should focus on the agrarian/dairy heritage of the area that is representative of “Old Meridian,” much of which has been lost to new development in recent decades. Margaret Aldape Park (70 acres, approximately) Margaret Aldape Park will be a natural, passive‐use area unlike any other park in Meridian’s park system. This is primarily due to its riverfront location and the unique opportunities for passive recreation, including walking/hiking, picnicking, fishing, wildlife viewing, and non‐motorized water sports, such as kayaking and paddle‐boarding, that this landscape affords. Emphasis will be on the development of pedestrian pathways to provide access to the site in a variety of seasons and corresponding water levels. There is also opportunity to enhance current wildlife habitat to sustain and promote the diverse species, including waterfowl, great blue heron, turkey, foxes, deer and elk, which live in and migrate through the park site. 98 City of Meridian, Idaho At the time of this plan, the southern park boundary remains proposed but yet‐to‐be‐determined. Final delineation of the park boundary will be an iterative process that takes into account the final revised FEMA floodway boundary; need for park land outside the floodway that can provide parking, restrooms and other constructed support amenities; and priorities of the proposed adjacent residential development. In terms of theming and identity, park design will take its cues from the Boise River environment, Basque culture and history, and elements of Aldape family history. Theming may relate to paths and architectural elements, materials, place names, integrated art pieces, and other design opportunities as they arise. Design Programming After agreeing on general a conceptual approach to the design for each park, the team developed a detailed list of program elements for each. This provided a starting point for the creation of design concepts. Programming for each park site was founded on needs identified in the initial needs assessment. This information was then filtered through the more specific working knowledge of the Meridian Parks and Recreation project team which included staff who deal directly with programming and scheduling demands for facilities on an ongoing basis. Concept Development Site Analysis Graphic site analyses were created for the South and West Meridian Regional Park properties. These diagrams summarized existing drainage patterns on site, potential irrigation water sources, locations of existing and future utilities, surrounding land uses and traffic patterns, and any other existing conditions that might affect design and development of the site. A lengthy walking field trip and site visit was taken to the Aldape Property, but as no boundary information was available at the time, site analysis information was recorded primarily in the form of notes and photographs. No formal summary graphic was created. Preliminary Concepts/Staff Review For South Meridian Regional Park and West Meridian Regional Park, preliminary concepts were developed and presented to staff for review, then adjusted in a series of iterative meetings and discussions. At this point in the process, focus was on placement of park amenities and desired adjacencies to achieve functional relationships among all elements on site. Parking needs were estimated relative to proposed park amenities, and anticipated use. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 99 Development of Final Design Concepts As a result of these more specific functional considerations, and after additional collaboration between the design consultant and MPR staff, the preliminary designs were refined into preferred master plan concepts for each park. Though not executed to a high level of detail, the conceptual plans aimed to establish a realistic development scenario for each property, establish a strong design aesthetic, and create a unique sense of place for each proposed park. Each concept was then rendered in color for presentation at a community open house. Community Input Community Open Houses Community open houses were held for the South Meridian Regional Park (77‐Acre Property) and West Meridian Regional Park (Borup‐Bottles Property) on Thursday July 9, 2015, and Thursday, July 30, 2015, respectively. Each meeting included an initial summary of the overall master planning process and needs assessment by Meridian Parks and Recreation staff. The consultant team then offered a site analysis overview before presenting each concept in detail. Limited questions and discussion of the concepts were entertained before breaking into less formal interactions for the sake of obtaining community input. At each meeting, opportunities for public comment included: Written comment cards Opportunity to “draw” input on black‐and‐white concept plans that were provided around the room, along with colored markers Face‐to‐face conversation with design consultants and MPR Staff Due to timing and other considerations relative to the donation of the Aldape Property, a community open house was not held for the Aldape Park Master Plan. All documents related to the conceptual park master plans are located in Appendix I. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Parks and Recreation Master Plan 101 V. Key Issues Triangulation Matrix Key issues were identified using a number of tools: review of existing plans and documents, focus groups, stakeholder meetings, a community survey, inventory and level of service analysis, and My Sidewalk online engagement. The information gathered from these sources was evaluated, and the following recommendations and action plans were developed. The findings are summarized on the Key Issues Matrix (Table 10), which captures all of the key issues that surfaced during the Master Plan process and prioritizes them on one matrix. The key issues were placed into four categories on the matrix: a) Priority b) Opportunity to Improve c) Minor or Future Issue Left blank means the issue did not come up or wasn’t addressed in that venue The qualitative data planning tools used to determine the priority of key issues include: 1. Existing planning documents 2. Consultant team’s expertise 3. SWOT Analysis 4. Parks and Recreation staff input 5. Public forum input The quantitative data planning tools used to determine the priority of the key issues include: 1. Community Survey 2. City Data 3. GRASP Analysis The key issues were organized into four areas including: 1. Organizational 2. Finance 3. Programs and Service Delivery 4. Facility and Amenities Preliminary recommendations are listed for each key issue and presented to the Parks and Recreation project team to gather input on the prioritization of the final recommendations and action plans. The Key Issues Matrix summarizes the areas that need immediate attention and determine the direction of the implementation of recommendations in the Master Plan. 102 City of Meridian, Idaho Table 10: Key Issues Analysis Matrix Using the Key Issues Matrix, a summary of all research, analysis, and input assembled for this study, a variety of recommendations have emerged. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 103 Level of Service: Improve recreational connectivity through neighborhood pathway connections and park “spurs.” Continue to improve level of service especially at “Neighborhood” Parks through upgrades or additional components if pathways cannot be added. Work with neighborhoods to create an individual identity for each neighborhood park. Work with alternative providers to increase level of service in area where Meridian doesn’t have neighborhood parks but level of service is low. Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks. Existing Facilities: Maintain and improve existing facilities and amenities including upgrades to outdated amenities that do not function well, especially in areas of low current service. Continue to improve level of service, especially at “Neighborhood” Parks through upgrades or additional components. Add shade structures where appropriate. Ensure ADA accessibility at all facilities. Work with neighborhoods to create an individual identity for each neighborhood park. Additional or Future Parks and Amenities: Consider programming needs where adding or upgrading components at existing parks. Expand pathways & connectivity. Monitor sports field demands & needs. Improve recreational connectivity through neighborhood trail connections and park “spurs.” When considering new Parks look to no service and low service areas as priorities for acquisition of future park land. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Parks and Recreation Master Plan 105 VI. Great Things to Come – Recommendations and Action Plans A. Recommendations After analyzing the Findings that resulted from this process, including the Key Issues Matrix, a summary of all research, the qualitative and quantitative data, the GRASP® LOS analyses, and input assembled for this study, a variety of recommendations have emerged to provide guidance in consideration of how to improve parks, recreation, and pathway opportunities in the City of Meridian. This section describes ways to enhance the level of service and the quality of life with improvement through organizational efficiencies, financial opportunities, improved programming and service delivery, and maintenance and improvements to facilities and amenities. Organizational: Maintain existing level of service goal Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department activities and services Provide improved signage agency‐wide to make it easier for patrons to find and use parks, facilities, and pathways Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways Increase appropriate partnerships within the community Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service Maintain and keep current the Department Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Policies Expand Volunteer Program Financial: Increase Special Event and Activities Sponsorships Evaluate Developer Impact Fee Ordinance Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities Implement a cost recovery and pricing policy 106 City of Meridian, Idaho Goal 1: Continue to Improve Organizational Efficiencies Objective 1.1 – Maintain existing level of service goal The City of Meridian currently has a Level of Service that is three acres of developed park land per 1,000 persons with a goal of increasing to a Level of Service Standard of four acres/1,000 persons by 2040. Additionally, the City should develop a Level of Service Standard that considers components within parks and a radius of .5 miles per component for walkability. Objective 1.2 – Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department activities and services. The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to implement the Marketing Plan (Communication Plan) that will guide the Department’s efforts in communicating and promoting its activities, services, and facilities. This will continue to create great awareness and should include all the recommendations in the Master Plan for programs, services, and facility upgrades. Additionally, the Marketing Plan should be reviewed annually and updated as needed and include marketing strategies that incorporate the efforts of partner departments and projects. The marketing and communication of Parks and Recreation Department activities should be enhanced with a focused effort on adopting open lines of communication and meetings with partners and potential partners within the community. This enhanced focus will help to create advocacy in the community and provide a forum to better celebrate the successes of the Department. Programs and Service Delivery: Increase year round recreational programming and activities Facilities and Amenities: Maintain and improve existing facilities and amenities Expand pathways and connectivity Add indoor recreation space Develop new amenities at new and existing parks based on level of service analysis Acquire new land for parks Improve parking at parks Continue to improve ADA accessibility at all facilities Upgrade comfort, convenience, and cultural amenities to existing facilities Add destination park amenities Address current and future needs for athletic fields Consider programming needs when adding components to existing parks or when developing new parks Monitor use, demand, and trends of recreation components Parks and Recreation Master Plan 107 Objective 1.3 – Provide improved signage agency‐wide to make it easier for patrons to find and use parks, facilities, and pathways. The Parks and Recreation Department should evaluate directional and wayfinding signage to facilities on roadway, pathways, and within parks. Additionally, the Department should develop signage standards for parks and update existing park signs as parks are renovated to meet the new standard. Improved wayfinding signage will contribute to a greater connectivity of parks, facilities, and pathways. Objective 1.4 – Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities. There was an overwhelming public response to make sure that Parks and Recreation maintains and improves existing facilities. The Department should continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities and amenities as well as address low scoring components through the CIP Plan and the Life Cycle Maintenance Program. Objective 1.5 – Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways. Mobile marketing is a trend of the future. Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much higher rates than adults in age brackets 30 and older. Usage rates of mobile applications demonstrate that chronologically across four major age cohorts, Millennials tend to get information more frequently using mobile devices, such as smart phones. Parks and Recreation should explore additional social media uses and navigation apps for parks and pathways. The City of Meridian has current best practices for social media that should be followed, reviewed annually, and updated as is needed. Objective 1.6 – Increase appropriate partnerships within the community. The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department currently partners with a number of agencies to provide programs and activities to the community. The Department should continue to explore additional opportunities, as well as build on their existing partnerships. Where not already in place, the Department should ensure that all existing and future partnerships are accurately portrayed in a signed partnership agreement (Sample Partnership Policy can be found in Appendix E). The City of Meridian Strategic Plan that was adopted in 2015 sets a goal of continuing to explore partnerships with alternative providers to increase level of service. Additionally, the Department should identify desired sports facilities or complexes and establish partnerships that foster their development. Objective 1.7 – Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies. The Department should continue to explore additional opportunities to expand the use of technology Department wide. Some immediate area to increase technology within the Department would be provide online shelter reservations and provide a mobile application of the Department’s website. Objective 1.8 – Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service. As recommendations in the Master Plan for programs, services, new facilities, pathways, parks, and facility upgrades are implemented, it is important to maintain staffing levels to maintain current performance standards. This will require the new positions both in parks and recreation. 108 City of Meridian, Idaho Objective 1.9 – Maintain and keep current the Department Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Policies. The Parks and Recreation Department is governed by City Code and internal standards of operations and policies. The Department should review the City Code Chapter for Parks and Recreation annually and recommend updates as needed. Additionally, staff should review Department SOPs and policies annually and update as needed. Objective 1.10 – Expand the volunteer program The Department currently has a Park Ambassador Program that could be reviewed, improved, and expanded to meet its growing needs. Additionally, it should continue to make use of other volunteer opportunities for park projects and events. Goal 2: Increase Financial Opportunities Objective 2.1 – Increase special event and activities sponsorships. The Department should continue to explore additional sponsorship opportunities and build on existing sponsorships. All existing and future sponsorships should be evaluated to ensure that they are accurately portrayed in a signed sponsorship agreement (Sample Sponsorship Policy can be found in Appendix D). Objective 2.2 – Evaluate Developer Impact Fee Ordinance. The current Developer Impact Fee is based on a LOS of 3.04 acres of developed park land per 1,000 people. As the Department moves toward their goal of four acres of developed park land per 1,000 people, they need to review the ordinance every three years to keep current with the LOS. Additionally, the Department should review its Developer Impact Fee revenue annually to align with CIP requests and existing LOS. Objective 2.3 – Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities. The Department currently takes advantage of grant opportunities available for programming, services, and facility improvements. The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to pursue any and all grant opportunities at the federal, state, regional, and local levels. To accomplish this, the Department may consider contracting with a dedicated grant writer to research, submit, and track such grants. Objective 2.4 –Implement a cost recovery and pricing policy. The Department currently has a practice of cost recovery, but it varies based on the different service areas. The Parks and Recreation Department should implement a Cost Recovery Policy, such as the Pyramid Pricing Methodology to determine a consistent method of pricing Parks and Recreation activities throughout the Department. As part of the policy, the Department should continue to support the current Care Enough to Share Scholarship Program. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 109 In addition to establishing a Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy, the Department should explore the feasibility of a dedicated revenue for parks and recreation through special revenue funds, sports, tourism, or other available sources. Goal 3: Continue to Improve Programs and Service Delivery Objective 3.1 – Increase year round recreational programming and activities. The Department should continue to look for opportunities to expand indoor recreational programs and activities. The community would like to see additional programs for tweens, teens, people with special needs, and seniors. As new programs are developed, continue to monitor recreational trends to stay current with programming and demand. As popularity in program offerings and activities increases, continue to look for opportunities to expand programs around working hours and commuting citizens schedules. The City’s Strategic Plan has also set a goal to attract, promote, and maintain a “signature” event for the City, and to set targets, identify gaps, and deploy programs, activities, and events that provide family‐ centered recreational opportunities. Goal 4: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities Objective 4.1 – Maintain and improve existing facilities. The Department should continue to implement existing plans, the CIP, Life Cycle Replacement Programs, and the Master Plan. These plans should be reviewed annually and updated as needed. Objective 4.2 – Expand pathways and connectivity. The Department should continue to implement the existing Pathways Master Plan and update as needed based on annual reviews. As new and existing pathways are designed and renovated, the Department should consider adding fitness stations and family fun stations in appropriate locations along the pathways. Objective 4.3 – Add indoor recreation space. Based on feedback from focus group participants and the survey results, there is a need for additional indoor recreation space. The Department should continue to explore opportunities to add additional indoor recreation space either through partnerships, purchase of an existing facility, or construction of a Community Center or Fieldhouse. Another option would be to explore opportunities to add Community Centers to newly planned elementary schools. Objective 4.4 – Develop new amenities at existing parks based on level of service analysis. Demand for usage of Meridian parks and athletic facilities continue to grow, and the Department should look for opportunities to add new amenities to enhance the experience for users. As Meridian continues to grow, the Department should look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in those new growth areas. Also, based on the GRASP® analysis, the Department should look for opportunities to add new components at existing parks where the level of service is below threshold. 110 City of Meridian, Idaho Objective 4.5 – Acquire new land for parks. Based on population growth and a LOS goal of reaching four acres of developed park land per 1,000 population, the Department needs to continue to find and purchase additional land for future park development. When considering new parks, priority should be given to areas where LOS is below threshold. Objective 4.6 – Improve parking at parks. Parking was an issue that was identified at most of the focus groups. The Department should continue to monitor parking during peak usage times and explore the need to improve and potentially add more parking at appropriate parks and amenities. Another consideration would be to explore alternative transportation options to reduce parking demand. Objective 4.7 – Continue to improve ADA accessibility at all facilities. According to the ADA.gov website, “Access to civic life by people with disabilities is a fundamental goal of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). To ensure that this goal is met, Title II of the ADA requires State and local governments to make their programs and services accessible to persons with disabilities… One important way to ensure that Title II's requirements are being met in cities of all sizes is through self‐ evaluation, which is required by the ADA regulations. Self‐evaluation enables local governments to pinpoint the facilities, programs, and services that must be modified or relocated to ensure that local governments are complying with the ADA.” Parks and Recreation currently does not have an ADA Accessibility Transition Plan which identified needed changes during a self‐evaluation process. The Department needs to conduct a self‐evaluation and develop a comprehensive transition plan. Once the ADA Transition Plan is developed and adopted, it should be updated at least every five years. Objective 4.8 – Upgrade comfort, convenience, and cultural amenities to existing facilities. As the Department is making upgrades to, and improving, existing facilities, it should explore opportunities to add shade, storage, security lighting, synthetic turf, and other amenities appropriately at existing facilities. Working with the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Department should seek opportunities to create individual identities for each Neighborhood Park. Where appropriate, look for opportunities to add public art to new and existing facilities. Objective 4.9 – Add destination park amenities. As citizen interest grows, and demand for new and different amenities at parks are identified, the Department should explore opportunities to add destination playgrounds and natural play areas at existing parks. The newly adopted Strategic Plan also has a goal to foster development of Discovery Parks that uniquely blend arts, entertainment, and culture. Objective 4.10 – Address current and future needs for athletic fields. As demand warrants, explore opportunities to add rectangle and diamond fields as usage increases. To help increase field time, add sports field lighting to new facilities and improvements to lighting at existing facilities where appropriate. Additionally, the Department should consider upgrading or adding synthetic turf fields as use and demand increases. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 111 Objective 4.11 – Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when developing new parks. Continue to evaluate the programming needs of the community when developing new parks or when adding new components to existing parks. Objective 4.12 – Monitor use, demands, and trends of recreation components. Through the use of dashboards and other reporting and tracking tools, continue to monitor and evaluate the use, demands, and trends in recreation amenities. B. Action Plan, Cost Estimates, and Prioritization The following Goals, Objectives, and Action Items for the recommendations are drawn from the public input, inventory, level of service analysis, community survey, findings feedback, and all the information gathered during the master planning process with a primary focus on maintaining, sustaining, and improving City of Meridian parks, recreation, and pathways. All cost estimates are in 2015 figures where applicable. Most costs are dependent on the extent of the enhancements and improvements determined. Timeframe to complete is designated as: Short‐term (up to 3 years) Mid‐term (4‐6 years) Long‐term (7‐10 years) Goal 1: Continue to Improve Organizational Efficiencies Objective 1.1: Maintain existing level of service goal Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.1.a Continue the planning goal of four acres of developed park land per 1,000 population. TBD Staff Time Ongoing Objective 1.2: Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding Department activities and services Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.2.a Continue to implement the Marketing Plan (Communication Plan). $0 Staff Time Short‐Term 1.2.b Review annually and update the Marketing Plan as needed. $0 Staff Time Ongoing 112 City of Meridian, Idaho Objective 1.3: Provide improved signage agency‐wide to make it easier for patrons to find and use parks, facilities, and pathways Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.3.a Evaluate directional and wayfinding signage to facilities on roadways, pathways, and within parks. $0 Staff Time Short‐Term 1.3.b Develop signage standards for parks. $0 Staff Time Short‐Term 1.3.c Enhance and update existing park signs as parks are renovated. TBD Staff Time Ongoing Objective 1.4: Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.4.a Continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities and amenities through the CIP Plan and the Life Cycle Maintenance Programs. See CIP Plan and Life Cycle Maintenance Programs Staff Time Ongoing Objective 1.5: Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.5.a Explore additional social media uses and navigation apps for parks and pathways. TBD Staff Time Short‐Term 1.5.b Follow current social media best practices, review annually, and recommend updates as needed. $0 Staff Time Ongoing Objective 1.6: Increase appropriate partnerships within the community Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.6.a Explore additional partnership opportunities as well as build on existing partnerships with focus on low service areas. $0 Staff Time TBD Potential increased revenue or decreased expenses Ongoing 1.6.b Ensure all existing and future partnerships are accurately portrayed in a signed partnership agreement (Sample Partnership Policy has been provided in Appendix E). $0 Staff Time Ongoing 1.6.c Identify desired sports facilities or complexes and establish partnerships that foster their development. TBD Staff Time Ongoing Parks and Recreation Master Plan 113 1.6.d Continue to explore partnerships with alternative providers to increase level of service. (Strategic Plan 5.A.2) TBD Staff Time Ongoing Objective 1.7: Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.7.a Continue to explore additional opportunities to expand the use of technology Department wide. $0 Staff Time Ongoing 1.7.b Increase the use of technology by providing online shelter reservations and a mobile application of the Department’s website. TBD Staff Time Short‐Term Objective 1.8: Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.8.a Hire and train staff for current and future parks, facilities, and pathways maintenance demands. $0 TBD Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term 1.8.b Hire and train staff for current and future recreation programming and facility usage demands. $0 TBD Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term Objective 1.9: Maintain and keep current the Department Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Policies Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.9.a Review Department SOP and policies annually and update as needed. $0 Staff Time Ongoing 1.9.b Review the City Code Chapter for Parks and Recreation annually and recommend updates as needed. $0 Staff Time Ongoing Objective 1.10: Expand the volunteer program Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 1.10.a Improve the current Park Ambassador Program. $0 Staff Time Short‐Term 1.10.b Continue to make use of other volunteer opportunities for park projects and events. $0 Staff Time On‐going 114 City of Meridian, Idaho Goal 2: Increase Financial Opportunities Objective 2.1 Increase special event and activities sponsorships Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 2.1.a Explore additional sponsorship opportunities and build on existing sponsorships. $0 Staff Time TBD Potential increased revenue or decreased expenses Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term 2.1.b Ensure that all existing and future sponsorships are accurately portrayed in a signed sponsorship agreement (Sample Sponsorship Policy has been provided in Appendix D). $0 Staff Time Short Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term Objective 2.2: Evaluate Developer Impact Fee Ordinance Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 2.2.a Review Developer Impact Fee revenue annually to align with CIP requests and existing LOS. $0 Staff Time Ongoing 2.2.b Review Impact Fee Ordinance approximately every five years. $0 Staff Time Ongoing Objective 2.3: Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 2.3.a Continue to seek philanthropic donations and grant opportunities. $0 Staff Time Short‐Term 2.3.b Consider contracting with a dedicated grant writer to research, submit, and track federal, regional, state, and local grants. Potential Matching Funds TBD % of successful grants TBD Short‐Term Objective 2.4: Implement a cost recovery and pricing policy Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 2.4.a Continue periodic evaluation of fees for programs and facilities. $0 Staff Time Ongoing 2.4.b Continue to support the current Care Enough to Share Scholarship Program. $0 $0 Ongoing 2.4.c Develop a cost recovery and pricing policy. $40,000 Staff Time Short‐Term Parks and Recreation Master Plan 115 2.4.d Explore feasibility of a dedicated funding source for parks and recreation through special revenue, sports, or other available sources. TBD Staff Time Short‐Term Goal 3: Continue to Improve Programs and Service Delivery Goal 4: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities Objective 4.1 Maintain and improve existing facilities Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.1.a Continue to implement existing plans, CIP, Master Plan, and Life Cycle Replacement Programs. TBD Staff Time Ongoing 4.1.b Review existing plans, CIP, Master Plan, and Life Cycle Replacement Programs and update as needed. TBD Staff Time Ongoing Objective 4.2: Expand pathways and connectivity Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.2.a Continue to implement existing Pathways Master Plan, review annually, and make updates as needed. $170,000 per mile $0 Ongoing Objective 3.1: Increase year round recreational programming and activities Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 3.1.a Continue to look for opportunities to expand indoor recreational programs and activities. $0 Staff Time Short‐Term 3.1.b Continue to monitor recreational trends to stay current with programming and demand. $0 Staff Time Ongoing 3.1.c Continue to look for opportunities to expand programs around working hours and commuting citizens. $0 Staff Time Ongoing 3.1.d Explore increasing the number of program opportunities for seniors, special needs, teens, and tweens. $0 Staff Time Ongoing 3.1.e Determine, attract, promote, and maintain a “signature” event for the City. (Strategic Plan 5.B.1) TBD Staff Time Ongoing 3.1.f Set targets, identify gaps, and deploy programs, activities, and events that provide family‐centered recreational opportunities. (Strategic Plan 5.B.4) TBD Staff Time Ongoing 116 City of Meridian, Idaho 4.2.b Add fitness stations and family fun stations in appropriate locations on pathways. $100‐$150K per park $0 Ongoing Objective 4.3: Add indoor recreation space Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.3.a Continue to explore opportunities to add additional indoor recreation space either through partnerships, purchase of an existing facility or construction of a Community Center or a Fieldhouse. TBD TBD Short‐Term 4.3.b Explore opportunities to add additional Community Centers to newly planned elementary schools. TBD TBD Short‐Term Mid‐Term Objective 4.4: Develop new amenities at new and existing parks based on level of service analysis Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.4.a Look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in new growth areas. TBD TBD Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term 4.4.b Look for opportunities to add new components at existing parks where level of service is below threshold. TBD TBD Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term Objective 4.5: Acquire new land for parks Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.5.a Continue to find and purchase additional land for future park development. TBD Staff Time Mid to Long Term 4.5.b When considering new Parks, look where LOS is below threshold. TBD Staff Time Mid to Long Term Objective 4.6: Improve parking at parks Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.6.a Explore the need to improve and potentially add more parking at appropriate parks and amenities. TBD Staff Time Short to Mid Term 4.6.b Consider alternative transportation options to reduce parking demand. TBD Staff Time Short to Mid Term Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-117 Objective 4.7: Continue to improve ADA accessibility at all facilities Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.7.a Develop and adopt an ADA Accessibility Transition Plan. TBD Staff Time Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term 4.7.b Review and update the ADA Accessibility Transition Plan every five years. $0 Staff Time Short‐Term Objective 4.8: Upgrade comfort, convenience, and cultural amenities to existing facilities Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.8.a Explore opportunities to add shade, storage, security lighting, synthetic turf, etc. appropriately at existing facilities. TBD Staff Time Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term 4.8.b Explore opportunities to work with the Parks and Recreation Commission to create an individual identity for each neighborhood park. TBD Staff Time Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term 4.8.c Explore opportunities to add public art appropriately at existing facilities. TBD Staff Time Short‐Term Mid‐Term Long‐Term Objective 4.9: Add destination park amenities Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.9.a Explore opportunities to add destination playground and natural play areas with climbing features. TBD Staff Time Short to Mid Term 4.9.b Foster development of Discovery Parks that uniquely blend arts, entertainment, and culture. (Strategic Plan 5.A.4) TBD Staff Time Short to Mid Term Objective 4.10: Address current and future needs for athletic fields. Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.10.a Explore opportunities to add both rectangle and diamond athletic fields as use and demands warrant. TBD TBD Short to Mid Term 4.10.b Where appropriate, add sports field lighting to new facilities and improvements to lighting at existing facilities. TBD TBD Short to Mid Term 4.10.c Consider upgrading or adding synthetic turf fields as use and demand for use of athletic field increases. TBD TBD Short to Mid Term 118 City of Meridian, Idaho Objective 4.11: Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when developing new parks Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.11.a Continue to evaluate the programming needs of the community when developing new parks or when adding new components to existing parks. TBD Staff Time Short to Mid Term Objective 4.12: Monitor use, demands, and trends of recreation components Actions Capital Cost Estimate Operational Budget Impact Timeframe to Complete 4.12.a Continue to monitor and evaluate the use, demands, and trends in recreation amenities. TBD TBD Short to Mid Term Parks and recreation Master Plan aPPendiX deceMber 2015 Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-1 Appendix A – Park and Recreation Influencing Trends The following information highlights relevant regional, and national outdoor recreation trends from various sources that may influence the City of Meridian’s recreation planning for the next several years. A. Demographic Trends in Recreation Adult – The Millennial Generation The 25–34 age range represents potential adult program participants. Many in this age group are beginning long‐term relationships and establishing families. The Millennial Generation is generally considered to represent those born between about 1980 and 1999 (ages 16 – 35). Twenty‐five percent (25%) of the population in Meridian is included within the Millennial Generation. In their book, Millennials Rising, the Next Great Generation, authors William Strauss and Neil Howe identify seven Millennial characteristics.4 These characteristics were discussed in a 2010 California State Parks Bulletin article entitled, “Here come the ‘Millennials’: What You Need to Know to Connect with this New Generation”: 1. Special: Used to receiving rewards just for participating, Millennials are raised to feel special. 2. Sheltered: Millennials lead structured lives filled with rules and regulations. Less accustomed to unstructured play than previous generations and apprehensive of the outdoors, they spend most of their time indoors, leaving home primarily to socialize with friends and families. 3. Team Oriented: This group has a “powerful instinct for community” and places a “High value on teamwork and belonging.” 4. Confident (and technologically savvy): Upbeat and with a can‐do attitude, this generation is more “optimistic and tech‐savvy than its elders.” 5. Pressured: Millennials feel “pressured to achieve and pressured to behave.” They have been “pushed to study hard and avoid personal risk.” 6. Achieving: This generation is expected to do great things, and they may be the next “great” generation. 7. Conventional (and diverse): Millennials are respectful of authority and civic minded. Respectful of cultural differences because they are ethnically diverse, they also value good conduct and tend to have a “standardized appearance.” The California State Parks article provides a broad range of ideas for engaging Millennials in parks and recreation.5 4 Howe, Neil, and William Strauss, (2000). Millennials Rising, the Next Great Generation. Vintage: New York, New York. 5 California State Parks, Recreation Opportunities. (2010) “Here come the ‘Millennials’: What You Need to Know to Connect with this New Generation,” http://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/795/files/millennials%20final, accessed January 12, 2015, pages 4‐6. The highest ranking age cohort in Meridian in 2014 was 35–44 (15 percent of the population) followed by the 45–54 and 25–34 age cohorts (12.8% and 12.5% of the population, respectively). Planning for the next ten years suggests a growing demand for programs and services for Baby Boomers and seniors (the 55 – 74 age range is predicted to grow by 2.9% by 2019). A -2 City of Meridian, Idaho Adult – The Baby Boomers Baby boomers are defined as individuals born between 1946 and 1964, as stated in Leisure Programming for Baby Boomers.6 They are a generation that consists of nearly 76 million Americans. In 2011, this influential population began its transition out of the workforce. As Baby Boomers enter retirement, they will be looking for opportunities in fitness, sports, outdoors, arts and cultural events, and other activities that suit their lifestyles. With varied life experiences, values, and expectations, Baby Boomers are predicted to redefine the meaning of recreation and leisure programming for mature adults. In the July 2012 issue of Parks and Recreation magazine, published by NRPA, Emilyn Sheffield, Professor of Recreation and Parks Management at the California State University, at Chico, write an article titled, “Five Trends Shaping Tomorrow Today.” In it, she indicated that Baby Boomers are driving the aging of America with Boomers and seniors over 65 composing about 39 percent of the nation’s population.7 In the leisure profession, this generation’s devotion to exercise and fitness is an example of its influence on society. When boomers entered elementary school, President John Kennedy initiated the President's Council on Physical Fitness; physical education and recreation became a key component of public education. As Boomers matured and moved into the workplace, they took their desire for exercise and fitness with them. Now, as the oldest Boomers are nearing 70, park and recreation professionals are faced with new approaches to provide both passive and active programming for older adults. Boomers are second only to Gen Y/Millennials in participation in fitness and outdoor sports.8 Jeffrey Ziegler, a past president of the Arizona Parks and Recreation Association identified “Boomer Basics” in his article, “Recreating retirement: how will baby boomers reshape leisure in their 60s?”9 Highlights are summarized below. Boomer Basics: Boomers are known to work hard, play hard, and spend hard. They have always been fixated with all things youthful. Boomers typically respond that they feel 10 years younger than their chronological age. Their nostalgic mindset keeps boomers returning to the sights and sounds of their 1960s youth culture. Swimming pools have become less of a social setting and much more of an extension of Boomers’ health and wellness program. Because Boomers in general have a high education level they will likely continue to pursue education as adults and into retirement. Boomers will look to park and recreation professionals to give them opportunities to enjoy many life‐ long hobbies and sports. When programming for this age group, a customized experience to cater to the need for self‐fulfillment, healthy pleasure, nostalgic youthfulness, and individual escapes will be important. Recreation trends will shift from games and activities that Boomers associate with senior citizens, as Ziegler suggests that activities such as bingo, bridge, and shuffleboard will likely be avoided because Boomers relate these activities to being old. 6 Linda Cochran, Anne Roshschadl, and Jodi Rudick, Leisure Programming For Baby Boomers, Human Kinetics, 2009. 7 Emilyn Sheffield, “Five Trends Shaping Tomorrow Today,” Parks and Recreation, July 2012 p. 16‐17. 82012 Participation Report, Physical Activity Council, 2012. 9 Jeffry Ziegler, “Recreating Retirement: How Will Baby Boomers Reshape Leisure in Their 60s?” Parks and Recreation, October 2002. In 2010, Baby Boomers represented 17 percent of the population in Meridian (those approximately 51 – 64 years of age). Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-3 Boomers are reinventing what being a 65‐year‐old means. Parks and recreation agencies that do not plan for Boomers carrying on in retirement with the same hectic pace they have lived during their years in employment will be left behind. Things to consider when planning for the demographic shift: Boomer characteristics What drives Boomers? Marketing to Boomers Arts and entertainment Passive and active fitness trends Outdoor recreation/adventure programs Travel programs Youth – Planning for the Demographic Shift Sheffield also identified that the proportion of youth is smaller than in the past, but still essential to our future. As of the 2010 Census, the age group under age 18 forms about a quarter of the U.S. population, and this percentage is at an all‐time low. Nearly half of this population group is ethnically diverse, and 25 percent is Hispanic. Multiculturalism Our country is becoming increasingly racially and ethnically diverse. In May 2012, the U.S. Census Bureau announced that non‐white babies now account for the majority of births in the United States. “This is an important tipping point,” said William H. Frey,10 the senior demographer at the Brookings Institution, describing the shift as a “…transformation from a mostly white Baby Boomer culture to the more globalized multi‐ethnic country that we are becoming.” Cultural and ethnic diversity adds a unique flavor to communities expressed through distinct neighborhoods, multicultural learning environments, restaurants, places of worship, museums, and nightlife. 11 As the recreation field continues to function within a more diverse society, race and ethnicity will become increasingly important in every aspect of the profession. More than ever, recreation professionals will be expected to work with, and have significant knowledge and understanding of, individuals from many cultural, racial, and ethnic backgrounds. 10 Adam Serwer, “The End of White America,” Mother Jones, http://www.motherjones.com/kevin‐drum/2012/05/end‐white‐ america, May 17, 2012. 11 Baldwin Ellis, “The Effects of Culture & Diversity on America,” http://www.ehow.com/facts_5512569_effects‐culture‐ diversity‐america.html, accessed on Sept. 20, 2012. While the City of Meridian has an overwhelmingly Caucasian population (91.3 percent in 2014), its demographic profile indicates that two percent of the population is Asian and .8 percent is African American. Additionally, 7.5 percent of the population is of Hispanic origin (irrespective of race). A -4 City of Meridian, Idaho Outdoor Participation varies by Ethnicity: Participation in outdoor activities is higher among Caucasians than any other ethnicity and lowest among African Americans in nearly all age groups. Lack of interest reason for not participating: When asked why they did not participate in outdoor activities more often, the number one reason given by people of all ethnicities and races was because they were not interested. Most popular outdoor activities: Biking, running, fishing, and camping were the most popular outdoor activities for all Americans, with each ethnic/racial group participating in each in varying degrees. Recreational Preferences among Ethnic/Racial Groups (Self‐Identifying): Nationwide participation in outdoor sports in 2013 was highest among Caucasians in all age groups and lowest among African‐Americans, according to the 2014 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report.”12 The biggest difference in participation rates was between Caucasian and African American adolescents, with 65 percent of Caucasians ages 13–17 participating and only 42 percent of African Americans in this age range participating. African‐Americans African American youth ages 6–12 (52% participation), are the only age group in this demographic to participate in outdoor recreation at a rate of more than 50 percent. By comparison, Caucasians in four of the five age groupings participated in outdoor sports at rates of 60 percent or more, with only those aged 45+ (40% participation) participating at under 50 percent. According to the 2014 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report,” the most popular outdoor activities among African‐Americans are: running/jogging and trail running (18%); fishing (freshwater, saltwater, and fly) (11%); road, mountain, and BMX biking (11%); birdwatching/wildlife viewing (4%); and camping (car, backyard, backpacking, and RV) (4%). Asian‐Americans Research about outdoor recreation among Asian‐Americans in the San Francisco Bay Area (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Filipino)13 found significant differences among the four groups concerning the degree of linguistic acculturation (preferred language spoken in various communication media). The research suggests that communications related to recreation and natural resource management should appear in ethnic media, but the results also suggest that Asian Americans should not be viewed as homogeneous with regard to recreation related issues. Another study14 found that technology use for finding outdoor recreation opportunities is highest among Asian/Pacific Islander populations. Over 60 percent of these populations use stationary or mobile technology in making decisions regarding outdoor recreation. According to the 2014 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report,” the most popular outdoor activities among Asian/Pacific Islanders are: running/jogging and trail running (24%); hiking (15%); road, mountain, and BMX biking (14%); camping (car, backyard, backpacking, and RV) (11%); and fishing (freshwater, saltwater, and fly) (10%). 12 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 2014,” Outdoor Foundation, 2014. 13 P.L. Winter, W.C. Jeong, G.C. Godbey, “Outdoor recreation among Asian Americans: A case study of San Francisco Bay Area residents,” Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 2004. 14 Harry Zinne and Alan Graefe, “Emerging Adults and the Future of Wild nature,” International Journal of Wildness. December 2007. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-5 Caucasians According to the 2014 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report,” the most popular outdoor activities among Caucasians are: running/jogging and trail running (19%); fishing (freshwater, saltwater, and fly) (18%); road, mountain, and BMX biking (17%); camping (car, backyard, backpacking and RV) (16%); and hiking (14%). Hispanics In the United States, the Hispanic population increased by 43 percent over the last decade, compared to five percent for the non‐Hispanic population, and accounted for more than half of all the population growth. According to Emilyn Sheffield, the growing racial and ethnic diversity is particularly important to recreation and leisure service providers, as family and individual recreation patterns and preferences are strongly shaped by cultural influences.15 Participation in outdoor sports among those who identify as Hispanic is at seven percent nationwide, according to the “2013 Outdoor Recreation Participation Report.”16 Those who do get outdoors, however, participate more frequently than other outdoor participants, with an average of 43 outings per year. Hispanic youth (ages 6–17) are the most likely age group to participate in outdoor recreation, followed closely by those in the 25–44 age range. The most popular outdoor activities among Hispanics are: running and jogging (22%); road, mountain, and BMX biking (17%); fishing (freshwater, saltwater, and fly) (14%); Camping (car, backyard, and RV) (11%); and hiking (9%). Multiculturalism and Marketing Today the marketplace for consumers has dramatically evolved in the United States from a largely Anglo demographic, to the reality that the United States has shifted to a large minority consumer base known as “new majority.” The San Jose Group, a consortium of marketing communications companies specializing in reaching Hispanic and non‐Hispanic markets of the United States, suggests that today’s multicultural population of the United States, or the “new majority,” is 107.6 million, which translates to about 35.1 percent of the country’s total population. The United States’ multicultural population alone could essentially be the 12th largest country in the world.17 Parks and recreation trends in marketing leisure services continue to emerge and should be taken into consideration in all planning efforts, as different cultures respond differently to marketing techniques. 15 Emilyn Sheffield, “Five Trends Shaping Tomorrow Today,” Parks and Recreation, July 2012 p. 16‐17. 16 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 2013,” Outdoor Foundation, 2013. 17 “SJG Multicultural Facts & Trends,” San Jose Group, http://blog.thesanjosegroup.com/?p=275, posted October 25, 2010. A -6 City of Meridian, Idaho B. Facilities According to Recreation Management magazine’s 2014 “State of the Industry Report,”18 national trends show an increased user‐base of recreation facilities (private and public). Additionally, parks and recreation providers responding to the survey indicated an average age of 23.8 years for their community recreation facilities. To meet that growing need, a majority of the parks and recreation survey respondents (69%) reported that they have plans to build new facilities or make additions or renovations to their existing facilities over the next three years. Nearly one‐third (32.5%) of parks respondents said that they have plans to build new facilities, and 28.9 percent said that they plan to add to their existing facilities. More than half (52.2%) are planning renovations to existing facilities. The current national trend is toward “one‐stop” indoor recreation facilities to serve all ages. Large, multi‐purpose regional centers help increase cost recovery, promote retention, and encourage cross‐ use. Agencies across the U.S. are increasing revenue production and cost recovery. Multi‐use facilities versus specialized space is a trend, offering programming opportunities as well as free‐play opportunities. “One stop” facilities attract young families, teens, and adults of all ages. Also according to the 2014 “State of the Industry Report” (p. 56), “…parks and recreation departments continue to see a slow recovery from the lowest points of the recent recession.” While 69 percent plan for construction for parks, the average amount planned for construction in the 2014 budgets saw a slight decrease of 4.5 percent from an average of $3,973,000 in last year’s survey to an average of $3,795.000 for 2014. There was very little change in the types of features and amenities included in the facilities of the survey respondents from last year to this year. The most commonly found features include splash play areas, trails, dog parks, park structures (shelters and restroom buildings); playgrounds; disc golf courses, open spaces (gardens, natural areas), synthetic turf sports fields; and concession areas. Aquatics/Water Recreation Trends According to the National Sporting Goods Association (NSGA), swimming ranked third nation‐wide in terms of participation in 2012.19 Outdoor swimming pools are not typically heated and open year round. Swimming for fitness is the top aspirational activity for “inactives” in 6 of 8 age categories in the SFIA “2013 Sports, Fitness and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report,” representing a significant opportunity to engage inactive populations. Nationally, there is an increasing trend towards indoor leisure and therapeutic pools. Additional indoor and outdoor amenities like “spray pads” are becoming increasingly popular as well. In some cities and counties spray pools are popular in the summer months and turn into ice rinks in the winter months. The 2014 Outdoor Recreation Participation Topline Report provided nation‐wide trends for various outdoor activities, including the following water recreation activities: board sailing/windsurfing, canoeing, fishing, kayaking, rafting, sailing, stand‐up paddling, and wakeboarding (Table 11). Among water recreation activities, stand up paddling has had the largest increase in participation in the past three years (23.9% increase) followed by several varieties of the kayaking experience: kayak fishing (20% increase), recreational kayaking (11.1%) and whitewater kayaking (6.6% increase). 18 Emily Tipping, “2014 State of the Industry Report, State of the Managed Recreation Industry,” Recreation Management, June 2014. 19 National Sporting Goods Association, “2012 Participation – Ranked by Total Participation,” 2013. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-7 Fly fishing participation is up while other fishing activities are down in the past three years. Sailing participation has increased somewhat over the past three years, while rafting participation is down.20 Table 11: Water Recreation Participation by Activity (in thousands) (6 years of age or older) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 3 Year Average Change Boardsailing/Windsurfing 1,128 1,607 1,151 1,593 1,324 ‐2.4% Canoeing 10,058 10,553 9,787 9,839 10,153 ‐1.2% Fishing (Fly) 5,568 5,478 5,360 6,012 5,878 2.4% Fishing (Freshwater/ Other) 40,961 38,860 39,071 39,135 37,796 ‐0.9% Kayak Fishing no data 1,044 1,201 1,409 1,798 20% Kayaking (Recreational) 6,212 6,465 8,229 8,144 8,716 11.1% Kayaking (White Water) 1,369 1,842 1,546 1,878 2,146 6.6% Rafting 4,318 4,460 3,821 3,690 3,836 ‐4.6% Sailing 4,342 3,869 3,725 3,958 3,915 ‐.5% Stand Up Paddling no data 1,050 1,242 1,542 1,993 23.9% Wakeboarding 3,577 3,645 3,389 3,348 3,316 ‐3.1% Source: Outdoor Foundation 2014 (numbers in thousands). Dog Parks Dog parks continue to see high popularity and have remained among the top planned addition to parks and recreational facilities over the past three years. In 2014, a new association was formed, dedicated to providing informational resources for starting and maintaining dog parks, the National Dog Park Association. Recreation Management magazine21 suggests that dog parks can represent a relatively low‐ cost way to provide an oft‐visited a popular community amenity. Dog parks can be as simple as a gated area, or more elaborate with “designed‐for‐dogs” amenities like water fountains, agility equipment, and pet wash stations, to name a few. According to Dog Fancy magazine, an ideal dog park should include the following: One acre or more surrounded by a 4‐ to 6‐foot fence Shade and water Adequate drainage Parking near the site A double gated entry Benches Pet‐waste disposal stations with pickup bags and covered waste receptacles Fitness Programming There have been many changes in fitness programs in the last 15 years. What clients wanted in 2000 is not necessarily what they want today. The American College of Sports Medicine’s (ACSM’s) Health and Fitness Journal22 has conducted an annual survey since 2007 to determine trends that would help create a standard for health and fitness programming. 20 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Topline Report 2014,” Outdoor Foundation, 2014. 21 Emily Tipping, “2014 State of the Industry Report, Trends in Parks and Recreation,” Recreation Management, June 2014. 22 “Walter R. Thompson, “Worldwide Survey of Fitness Trends for 2012,” Health & Fitness Journal, American College of Sports Medicine, 2011. A -8 City of Meridian, Idaho Table 12 shows survey results that focus on trends in the commercial, corporate, clinical, and community health and fitness industry. Some trends first identified in 2007 have stayed near the top of the list year after year, while others came and went in popularity. Zumba made a brief appearance on the top 10 in 2012, but has fallen off the list of top 20 in 2014. Body weight training appeared as a developing trend in 2014 and is projected to stay strong in 2015 as is high‐intensity interval training. Yoga is regaining popularity after falling out of the top 20 in 2009 and staying out of the top 10 until 2014. Fitness programs for older adults will remain strong in 2014 and 2015. Table 12: Top 10 Worldwide Fitness Trends for 2007 and Predicted Trends for 2015 2007 Trends for 2015 1. Children and obesity 1. Body weight training 2. Special fitness programs for older adults 2. High‐intensity interval training 3. Educated and experienced fitness professionals 3. Educated and experienced fitness professionals 4. Functional fitness 4. Strength training 5. Core training 5. Personal training 6. Strength training 6. Exercise and weight loss 7. Personal training 7. Yoga 8. Mind/Body Exercise 8. Fitness programs for older adults 9. Exercise and weight loss 9. Functional fitness 10. Outcome measurements 10. Group personal training Source: American College of Sport Medicine General Programming One of the most common concerns in the recreation industry is creating innovative programming to draw participants into facilities and services. Once in, participants recognize that the benefits are endless. According to Recreation Management magazine’s “2014 State of the Industry Report,”23 the most common programs offered by survey respondents include holiday events and other special events (78.1%), youth sports teams (69.1%), day camps and summer camps (64.7%), adult sports teams (61.3%), arts and crafts (60.9%), educational programs (60.5%), sports tournaments and races (56.8%), programs for active older adults (55.2%), fitness programs (61.4%), and festivals and concerts (53.2%). The report also suggested that more than 3 in 10 (35.7%) respondents are planning to add additional programs at their facilities over the next three years. The most common types of programming they are planning to add include: 1. Programming for active older adults (up from No. 5 on the 2013 survey) 2. Fitness programs (up from No. 3) 3. Teen programming (down from No. 2) 4. Adult sports teams (did not appear in 2013) 5. Holiday events and other special events (up from No. 6) 6. Mind‐body/balance programs – yoga, tai chi, Pilates, or martial arts (up from No. 7) 7. Environmental education (down from No. 1) 8. Educational programs (up from No. 4) 9. Festivals and concerts (up from No. 10) 10. Sports tournaments or races (down from No. 8) 23 Emily Tipping, “2014 State of the Industry Report, Trends in Parks and Recreation,” Recreation Management, June 2013. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-9 Older Adults and Senior Programming The American Academy of Sports Medicine issues a yearly survey of the top 20 fitness trends.24 It ranks senior fitness programs eighth among most popular fitness trends for 2015. Whether it’s SilverSneakers, a freestyle low‐impact cardio class, or water aerobics, more and more people are realizing the many benefits of staying active throughout life. According to the National Sporting Goods Association, popular senior programming trends include hiking, birding, and swimming. C. Economic Impact of Festivals and Events In the context of urban development, from the early 1980s, there has been a process that can be characterized as “festivalization,” which has been linked to the economic restructuring of towns and cities, and the drive to develop communities as large‐scale platforms for the creation and consumption of “cultural experience.” The success rate for festivals should not be evaluated simplistically solely on the basis of profit (sales), prestige (media profile), or size (numbers of events). Research by the European Festival Research Project (EFRP)25 indicates there is evidence of local and city government supporting and even instigating and managing particular festivals themselves to achieve local or regional economic objectives, often defined very narrowly (sales, jobs, tourists, etc.). There are also a growing number of smaller more local community‐based festivals and events in communities, most often supported by local councils that have been spawned partly as a reaction to larger festivals that have become prime economic‐drivers. These community‐based festivals often will re‐claim cultural ground based on their social, educational, and participative value. For more information on the values of festivals and events, see the CRC Sustainable Tourism research guide26 on this topic. In 2014, festivals grew in popularity as economic drivers and urban brand builders. Chad Kaydo describes the phenomenon in the January 2014 issues of Governing magazine: “Municipal officials and entrepreneur see the power of cultural festivals, innovation‐focused business conferences, and the like as a way to spur short‐term tourism while shaping an image of the host city as a cool, dynamic location where companies and citizens in modern, creative industries can thrive.”27 Examples of successful festivals include: South by Southwest (SXSW) – this annual music, film, and digital conference and festival in Austin, Texas, is a leading example. Launched in 1987, the festival’s economic impact has grown steadily over recent years. In 2007, it netted $95 million for Austin’s economy. In 2013, the event topped $218 million. Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival in California – this two‐week cultural event draws big‐ name bands, music fans, and marketers, attracting 80,000 people per day. 24 “Survey Predicts Top 20 Fitness Trends for 2015,” American College of Sports Medicine, http://www.acsm.org/about‐ acsm/media‐room/news‐releases/2014/10/24/survey‐predicts‐top‐20‐fitness‐trends‐for‐2015, Accessed January 2015. 25 EFRP is an international consortium seeking to understand the current explosion of festivals and its implications and perspective, http://www.efa‐aef.eu/en/activities/efrp/, accessed October 2012. 26 Ben Janeczko. Trevor Mules and Brent Ritchie, “Estimating the Economic Impacts of Festivals and Events: A Research Guide,” Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism, 2002, http://www.sustainabletourismonline.com/1005/events/estimating‐the‐economic‐impacts‐of‐festivals‐and‐events‐a‐research‐ guide, accessed October 2012. 27 Chad Kaydo, “Cities Create Music, Cultural Festivals to Make Money,” Governing, January 2014, http://www.governing.com/topics/finance/gov‐cities‐create‐mucis‐festivals.html. A -10 City of Meridian, Idaho First City Festival in Monterey, California – Private producer, Goldenvoice, launched this smaller music event in August 2013 with marketing support from the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau, drawing on the city’s history as host of the Monterey Jazz Festival. Adding carnival rides and local art, furniture and clothing vendors to the live music performances, the event drew 11,000 attendees each of its two days. D. Healthy Lifestyle Trends and Active Living Active Transportation – Bicycling and Walking Bicycle friendly cities have been emerging over the last ten years. Cycling has become a popular mode of transportation as people consider the rising cost of fuel, desire for better health, and concern for the environment. Some people also use cycling as a mode of transportation just for the fun of it. The Alliance for Biking and Walking published its “Bicycling and Walking in the United States 2014 Benchmark Report,”28 updating the one from 2012. The report shows that increasing bicycling and walking are clearly in the public interest. Where bicycling and walking levels are higher, obesity, high blood pressure, and diabetes levels are lower. Design of a community’s infrastructure is directly linked to physical activity – where environments are built with bicyclists and pedestrians in mind, more people bike and walk. Higher levels of bicycling and walking also coincide with increased bicycle and pedestrian safety and higher levels of physical activity. Increasing bicycling and walking make a big impact on improving public health and life expectancy. The following trends as well as health and economic indicators are pulled from the 2012 and 2014 Benchmarking Reports: Public health trends related to bicycling and walking include: Quantified health benefits of active transportation can outweigh any risks associated with the activities by as much as 77 to 1, and add more years to our lives than are lost from inhaled air pollution and traffic injuries. Between 1966 and 2009, the number of children who bicycled or walked to school fell 75 percent, while the percentage of obese children rose 276 percent. Bicycling to work significantly reduces absenteeism due to illness. Regular bicyclists took 7.4 sick days per year, while non‐bicyclists took 8.7 sick days per year. The economic benefits of bicycling and walking include: Bicycling and walking projects create 8‐12 jobs per $1 million spent, compared to just 7 jobs created per $1 million spent on highway projects. Cost benefit analyses show that up to $11.80 in benefits can be gained for every $1 invested in bicycling and walking. 28 2014 Benchmarking Report, Alliance for Biking and Walking, http://www.bikewalkalliance.org/download‐the‐2014‐ benchmarking‐report, Accessed on January 23, 2015. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-11 National bicycling trends: There has been a gradual trend of increasing bicycling and walking to work since 2005. Infrastructure to support biking communities is becoming more commonly funded in communities. Bike share systems, making bicycles available to the public for low‐cost, short‐term use, have been sweeping the nation since 2010. Twenty of the most populous U.S. cities have a functional bike share system. In November 2013, the Institute for Transportation & Development Policy published a Standard for Transportation Oriented Design, with accessible performance objectives and metrics, to help municipalities, developers and local residents design land use and built environment “to support, facilitate and prioritize not only the use of public transport, but the most basic modes of transport, walking and cycling.” The TOD Standard, along with its performance objectives and scoring metrics, can be found at www.itdp.org/documents/TOD_v2_FINAL.pdf.29 National Healthy Lifestyle Trends The population of the United States is becoming more diverse. As demographics are experiencing an age and ethnic shift, so too are landscapes, daily lifestyles and habits changing. The number of adults over the age of 65 has increased, and lifestyle changes have encouraged less physical activity; collectively these trends have created profound implications for the way local governments conduct business. Below are examples of trends and government responses. According to the article “Outdoor Exercise ‘Healthier than Gym Workouts,’” published in February 2011,30 researchers found that going for a run outdoors is better than exercising in the gym, because it has a positive impact on mental, as well as physical health. Levels of tension, confusion, anger, and depression were found to be lowered. This aligns with the trend of adult fitness playgrounds that are popping up all over the world. While Americans have been notoriously unhealthy, a recent survey found that 58 percent of Americans adults are paying more attention to their personal health than in the past; 57 percent seek to eat a healthier diet, 54 percent seek to achieve a healthy weight; and, 45 percent want to reduce stress in their lives.31 The link between health and the built environment continues to grow as a trend for local governments. They are increasingly incorporating active living and physical activity into daily routines. 29“TOD Standard, Version 2.0,” Institute for Transportation & Development Policy, November 2013, http://www.itdp.org/documents/TOD_v2_FINAL.pdf. 30 “Outdoor Exercise Healthier than Gym Workouts,” Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/outdoors/outdoor‐ activities/8306979/Outdoor‐exercise‐healther‐than‐gym‐workouts.html, accessed March 2011. 31 Sy Mukherjee, “Are Americans inching their way to Healthier Lifestyles?” Think Progress, http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/08/02/2403921/americans‐maybe‐getting‐heathier/, Aug 2, 2013. A -12 City of Meridian, Idaho More and more, local governments are accepting the role of providing preventative health care through park and recreation services. The following facts are from an International City/County Management local government survey32: Eight‐nine percent (89%) of respondents believed P&R departments should take the lead in developing communities conducive to active living. Eighty‐four percent (84%) had already implemented recreation programs that encourage active living in their community. The highest priority selected for the greatest impact on community health and physical inactivity was a cohesive system of parks and trails and accessible neighborhood parks. Health and Obesity According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), obesity continues to be a serious issue in America, growing at an epidemic rate—almost tripling since 1990. Overall, more than one‐third (35.7%) of adults and 17 percent of children in the United States are obese.33 These statistics illustrate the importance of intercepting the epidemic in youth. As obesity in the United States continues to be a topic of interest for legislators and our government, there continues to be research suggesting that activity levels are stagnant among all age groups. The following are statistics that support this concern. Only 25 percent of adults and 27 percent of youth (grades 9‐12) engage in recommended levels of physical activity. Fifty‐nine percent (59%) of American adults are sedentary. Nationally, children spend 4.5 to 8 hours daily (30‐56 hours per week) in front of a screen (television and/or computer). Shade Structures Communities around the country are considering adding shade structures as well as shade trees to their parks, playgrounds, and pools, as “…a weapon against cancer and against childhood obesity”34; both to reduce future cancer risk and promote exercise among children. A 2005 study found that melanoma rates in people under 20 rose three percent a year between 1973 and 2001, possibly due to a thinning of the ozone layer in the atmosphere. It is recommended that children seek shade between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m., but with so little shade available, kids have nowhere to go. Additionally, without adequate shade, many play areas are simply too hot to be inviting to children. On sunny days, the playground equipment is hot enough to scald the hands of would‐be users. Trees would help, as tree leaves absorb about 95 percent of ultraviolet radiation, but they take a decade or more to grow large enough to make a difference. So, many communities are building shade structures instead. The non‐profit Shade Foundation of American is a good resource for information about shade and shade structures, www.shadefoundation.org. 32 “Active Living approached by Local Government: Survey,” International City/County Management Association, http://bookstore.icma.org/freedocs/Active%20Living%20and%20Social%20Equity.pdf, 2004. 33 “Obesity and Overweight ‐ Facts,” Center for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/facts.html, accessed on October 3, 2012. 34 Liz Szabo, “Shade: A weapon against skin cancer, childhood obesity,” USA Today, June 30, 2011, usatoday.30.usatoday.com/news/health/wellness/story/2011/06/Shade‐serves‐as‐a –weapon‐against‐skin‐cancer‐childhood‐ obesity/48965070/1, accessed 5/23/3013. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-13 Trails and Health That a connected system of trails increases the level of physical activity in a community has been scientifically demonstrated through the Trails for Health initiative of the (CDC)35. Trails can provide a wide variety of opportunities for being physically active, such as walking/running/hiking, rollerblading, wheelchair recreation, bicycling, cross‐country skiing and snowshoeing, fishing, hunting, and horseback riding. Recognizing that active use of trails for positive health outcomes is an excellent way to encourage people to adopt healthy lifestyle changes, American Trails has launched a “Health and Trails” resource section in its website: www/americantrails.org/resources/benefits/. The health benefits are equally as high for trails in urban neighborhoods as for those in state or national parks. A trail in the neighborhood, creating a “linear park,” makes it easier for people to incorporate exercise into their daily routines, whether for recreation or non‐motorized transportation. Urban trails need to connect people to places they want to go, such as schools, transit centers, businesses, and neighborhoods.36 E. Natural Environments and Open Space Conservation The top ten recommendations of the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) Conservation Task Force were published in the November 2011 issue of Parks and Recreation magazine.37 These recommendations are a compilation of best practices used by trend‐setting agencies. 1) Take a leadership role in the community to promote conservation. Park and recreation agencies have a unique opportunity to bring governmental agencies, non‐profit organizations, community leaders, and the public together for the cause of working together on community wide conservation objectives – clean water, wildlife habitat preservation, reducing energy use and improving environmental quality. Park and recreation agencies must lead the way in promoting conservation to diverse and underserved audiences. 2) Lead by example in employing best management conservation practices in parks. Park and recreation agencies should become the catalyst in the community for conservation by showing how best practices can be adopted‐not mowing what you do not need to mow; stopping wasteful energy consumption; and reducing pesticide use for example. Show the public how conservation practices can benefit everyone. 3) Engage volunteers in conservation and stewardship. Create a sense of belonging and stewardship for parks by creating a personal sense of ownership and value. Enable people to identify with their parks and natural resources, and to care about their future. Sustain stewardship by creating meaningful public participation in implementation of conservation principles and practices. 35 “Guide to Community Preventive Services” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), http://www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html 36 “Health Community: What you should know about trail building,” National Trails Training Partnership: Health and Fitness, http://www.americantrails.org/resources/health/healthcombuild.html, accessed on May 24, 2013. 37 “Conservation Leaders in our Community,” National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), November 2011 Parks and Recreation Magazine, pages 85‐101, http://digital.parksandrecreation.org/launch.aspx? referral=other&pnum=&refresh=Fj302M1i0bE7&EID=8201df86‐57c9‐428c‐b31c‐18125a54265c&skip= A -14 City of Meridian, Idaho 4) Establish a strategic land acquisition strategy based on knowledge and awareness of significant natural and cultural resources (watershed protection, unique ecological characteristics, and sensitive natural areas deserving protection). As the largest owners of public land within most communities, park and recreation agencies should lead the way in developing a strategic vision for preserving open space and conserving important landscapes and natural features. 5) Engage youth in conservation. Get kids and teens outdoors and enjoying their parks. The experience of nature is inherently rewarding for youth. Set as a goal to connect kids in the community to nature and the outdoors. Children and youth will be fascinated by nature and will develop a lifelong affinity as well as a conservation ethic if they have early opportunities to enjoy nature and recreate outdoors in a safe, rewarding way. 6) Conserve energy in all ways. Park and recreation agencies must lead by example, showing the public how and why they should adopt practices that they can see demonstrated in parks and recreation facilities. Park and recreation agencies should adopt energy conservation measures that make sense and save public taxpayer funds. 7) Protect natural resources in parks and in the community. A core mission of public parks is to protect land and water resources and to be stewards of natural resources. This means committing personnel and resources to protect natural and cultural resources and creating sustainable long‐term methods of funding this conservation mission. Parks and recreation agencies are entrusted with some of the most important public assets of a community and the conservation and long‐term protection of this public trust is and should be a core component of every parks and recreation agency’s mission. 8) Create sustainable landscapes that demonstrate principles of conservation. Utilize sustainable landscape practices to save taxpayer funds, to measurably improve conservation benefits, and to educate the public about conservation. For example, agencies can reduce turf grass and mowing frequency; replace turf with native plants; manage floodplains for multiple uses including conservation and public recreation; enhance wetlands for water filtration and groundwater recharge; plant model landscapes of drought tolerant native plants adapted to climate and culture; and promote parks as food sources through edible landscapes and community gardens. 9) Forge partnerships that foster the mission of conservation. The greatest and most beneficial conservation successes most often occur as a result of collaboration. Park and recreation agencies should partner with non‐profit and community service organizations, universities and colleges, school systems, other governmental agencies, and non‐traditional partners for conservation outcomes. Promote health, education, and other goals while working toward a common mission of conservation. 10) Utilize technology to promote conservation. Park and recreation agencies need to embrace technology to promote conservation. This is not only in applications such as GIS, but in utilizing social media to engage the public, especially youth. Technology is not to be feared as something that detracts from the conservation mission of parks agencies, but rather it is to be accepted as a means of sharing knowledge and connecting people to conservation and stewardship. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-15 Economic & Health Benefits of Parks There are numerous economic and health benefits of parks, including the following: Trails, parks, and playgrounds are among the five most important community amenities considered when selecting a home. Research from the University of Illinois shows that trees, parks, and green spaces have a profound impact on people’s health and mental outlook.38 U.S. Forest Service research indicates that when the economic benefits produced by trees are assessed, the total value can be two to six times the cost for tree planting and care.39 Fifty percent (50%) of Americans regard outdoor activities as their main source of exercise.40 The Trust for Public Land has published a report titled: “The Benefits of Parks: Why America Needs More City Parks and Open Space.” The report makes the following observations about the health, economic, environmental, and social benefits of parks and open space41: Physical activity makes people healthier. Physical activity increases with access to parks. Contact with the natural world improves physical and physiological health. Residential and commercial property values increase. Value is added to community and economic development sustainability. Benefits of tourism are enhanced. Trees are effective in improving air quality and act as natural air conditioners. Trees assist with storm water control and erosion. Crime and juvenile delinquency are reduced. Recreational opportunities for all ages are provided. Stable neighborhoods and strong communities are created. Researchers have long touted the benefits of outdoor exercise. According to a study published in the Journal of Environmental Science and Technology by the University of Essex in the United Kingdom, “as little as five minutes of green exercise improves both mood and self‐esteem.”42 A new trend started in China as they prepared to host the 2008 Summer Olympics. Their aim was to promote a society that promotes physical fitness and reaps the benefits of outdoor exercise by working out on outdoor fitness equipment. The United States is now catching up on this trend, as park and recreation departments have begun installing “outdoor gyms.” Equipment that can be found in these outdoor gyms is comparable to what would be found in an indoor workout facility, such as leg and chest presses, elliptical trainers, pull down trainers, etc. With no additional equipment such as weights and resistance bands, the equipment is fairly easy to install. 38 F.E. Kuo, “Environment and Crime in the Inner City: Does Vegetation Reduce Crime?” Environment and Behavior, Volume 33, pp 343‐367. 39 Nowak, David J., “Benefits of Community Trees,” (Brooklyn Trees, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, in review). 40 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 2010,” Outdoor Foundation, 2010. 41 Paul M. Sherer, “The Benefits of Parks: Why America Needs More City Parks and Open Space,” The Trust for Public Land, San Francisco, CA, 2006. 42 Cited in: Sally Russell, “Nature Break: Five Minutes of Green Nurture,” Green Nurture Blog, http://blog.greennurture.com/tag/journal‐of‐environmental‐science‐and‐technology, Accessed on November 14, 2012. A -16 City of Meridian, Idaho Outdoor fitness equipment provides a new opportunity for parks and recreation departments to increase the health of their communities, while offering them the opportunity to exercise outdoors. Such equipment can increase the usage of parks, trails, and other outdoor amenities while helping to fight the obesity epidemic and increase the community’s interaction with nature. Nature Programming Noted as early as 2003 in Recreation Management magazine, park agencies have been seeing an increase in interest in environmental‐oriented “back to nature” programs. In 2007, the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) sent out a survey to member agencies in order to learn more about the programs and facilities that public park and recreation agencies provide to connect children and their families with nature.43 A summary of the results follow: Sixty‐eight percent (68%) of public parks and recreation agencies offer nature‐based programming and 61% have nature‐based facilities. The most common programs include nature hikes, nature‐oriented arts and crafts, fishing‐related events, and nature‐based education in cooperation with local schools. When asked to describe the elements that directly contribute to their most successful programs, agencies listed staff training as most important followed by program content and number of staff/staff training. When asked what resources would be needed most to expand programming, additional staff was most important followed by funding. Of the agencies that do not currently offer nature‐based programming, 90 percent indicated that they want to in the future. Additional staff and funding were again the most important resources these agencies would need going forward. The most common facilities include: nature parks/preserves, self‐guided nature trails, outdoor classrooms, and nature centers. When asked to describe the elements that directly contribute to their most successful facilities, agencies listed funding as most important followed by presence of wildlife and community support. 43 National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), “NRPA Completes Agency Survey Regarding Children and Nature,” http://www.narrp.org/assets/Library/Children_in_Nature/ nrpa_survey_regarding_children_and_nature_2007.pdf, April 2007. “There’s a direct link between a lack of exposure to nature and higher rates of attention‐deficit disorder, obesity, and depression. In essence, parks and recreation agencies can and are becoming the ‘preferred provider’ for offering this preventative healthcare.” – Fran P. Mainella, former director of the National Park Service and Instructor at Clemson University. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-17 Figures from the Association for Interpretative Naturalists, a national group of nature professionals, demonstrate that nature‐based programs are on the rise. According to Tim Merriman, the Association's Executive Director, the group was founded in 1954 with 40 members. It now boasts 4,800 members, with research indicating that about 20,000 paid interpreters are working nationally, along with an army of more than 500,000 unpaid volunteers staffing nature programs at parks, zoos, and museums. The growth of these programs is thought to come from replacing grandparents as the teacher about the “great outdoors.” It is also speculated that a return to natural roots and renewed interest in life’s basic elements was spurred as a response to September 11, 2001. 44 In his book Last Child in the Woods: Saving Children from Nature Deficit Disorder,45 Richard Louv introduced the concept of the restorative qualities of being out in nature, for both children and adults. This concept, and research in support of it, has led to a growing movement promoting connections with nature in daily life. One manifestation of this is the development of Nature Explore Classrooms in parks. Nature Explore46 is a collaborative program of the Arbor Day Foundation and the non‐profit organization, Dimensions Educational Research Foundation, with a mission of helping children and families develop a profound engagement with the natural world, where nature is an integral, joyful part of children’s daily learning. Nature Explore works to support efforts to connect children with nature. F. Sports and Recreation Trends General Sports and Recreation Trends The National Sporting Goods Association (NSGA) survey on sports participation in 201247 found the top five athletic activities ranked by total participation included: exercise walking, exercising with equipment, swimming, camping, and aerobic exercising. Additionally, the following active, organized, or skill development activities remain popular: hiking, running/jogging, bicycle riding, basketball, golf, and soccer. Table 13 outlines the top twenty sports ranked by total participation in 2012. 44 Margaret Ahrweiler,” Call of the Wild – From beautiful blossoms to bugs and guts, nature programs are growing as people return to their roots” Recreation Management Magazine, Http://recmanagement.com/200310fe04.php, October 2003. 45 Richard Louv, Last Child in the Woods: Saving Children from Nature Deficit Disorder, Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2005. 46 “What is the Nature Explore Program,” http://www.arborday.org/explore/documents/ NE_FAQ_002.pdf, accessed on August 12, 2012. 47 2012 Sport/Recreation Activity Participation,” National Sporting Goods Association, 2013, http://www.nsga.org. A -18 City of Meridian, Idaho Table 13: Top Twenty Sports Ranked by Total Participation (in millions) in 2012 Sport Total 1. Exercise Walking 102.1 2. Exercising with Equipment 57.7 3. Swimming 48.6 4. Camping (vacation/overnight) 45.2 5. Aerobic Exercising 44.8 6. Hiking 42.2 7. Running/Jogging 40.0 8. Bicycle Riding 39.3 9. Bowling 35.5 10. Workout at Club 35.2 11. Weight Lifting 31.1 12. Fishing (Freshwater) 30.8 13. Wrestling 28.4 14. Basketball 25.6 15. Yoga 22.9 16. Billiards/Pool 21.8 17. Target Shooting 21.7 18. Golf 21.1 19. Hunting with Firearms 19.4 20. Boating, Motor/Power 17.0 Source: NSGA 2012 The Sports & Fitness Industry Association (SFIA) produces a yearly report on sports, fitness, and leisure activities in the US. The following findings were highlighted in the 2013 Report48: Overall participation in sports, fitness, and related physical activities remained relatively steady from 2011 to 2012. Fitness Sports had the largest increase in participation (2% increases to 61.1%). Racquet Sports participation also increased (1% increase to 12.8%), but still remains below the 2008 peak rate of 14%. Both team (21.6%) and water sports 12.5%) participation increased slightly while individual (36%) and winter sports (6.6%) participation decreased slightly. Outdoor Sports participation remained stable at around 49%. Spending on team sports at school and lessons/instruction/sports camp was expected to increase in 2013 as it has in 2011 and 2012. Twenty‐eight percent (28%) of all Americans are inactive, while 33% are active at a healthy level (engaged in high calorie level sport/fitness activities in a frequent basis). Idaho ranked among the states with the highest among five activity levels measured (from 38% to 43.6%). The Ten ‐year History of Sports Participation Report49 published by NSGA shows national trends in team sports and individual sports. Overall participation trends indicate a general increase in 2011 for most team sports. However, softball and volleyball show a decrease in participation through 2011. 48 “2012 Sports, Fitness and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report,” Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (renamed Sports and Fitness Industry Association in 2012, http://www.sfia.org/reports/all/. 49 Ten‐Year History of Sports Participation (2001‐2011), National Sporting Goods Association, 2012, http://www.nsga.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3346. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-19 Over the decade individual sports show a dramatic increase in aerobic exercising, exercise walking, exercising with equipment, hiking, kayaking, running/jogging, target shooting and target shooting with an airgun, tennis, weightlifting and working out at a club. Table 14 illustrates a ten year change in participation for selected activities including both team sports and individual sports. Table 14: Ten‐Year History of Sports Participation (in millions) 2001‐2011 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 Aerobic Exercising 24.3 28.0 33.7 34.8 33.2 42.0 Archery (Target) 4.7 3.9 6.8 6.6 7.1 6.3 Backpacking/Wilderness Camping 14.5 13.7 13.3 13.0 12.3 11.6 Baseball 14.9 14.6 14.6 14.0 11.5 12.3 Basketball 28.1 27.9 29.9 24.1 24.4 26.1 Bicycle Riding 39.0 36.3 43.1 37.4 38.1 39.1 Billiards/Pool 32.7 30.5 37.3 29.5 28.2 20.0 Boating, Motor/Power 22.6 24.2 27.5 31.9 24.0 16.7 Bowling 40.3 39.4 45.4 43.5 45.0 34.9 Camping 45.5 51.4 46.0 47.5 50.9 42.8 Dart Throwing 16.9 n/a n/a 12.1 12.2 9.3 Exercise Walking 71.2 79.5 86.0 89.8 93.4 97.1 Exercising with Equipment 43.0 48.6 54.2 52.9 57.2 55.5 Fishing (Freshwater) 39.1 33.2 37.5 30.8 29.0 28.0 Fishing (Saltwater) 11.3 10.6 10.0 10.4 8.2 9.7 Football (tackle) 8.6 8.7 9.9 9.2 8.9 9.0 Golf 26.6 25.7 24.7 22.7 22.3 20.9 Hiking 26.1 25.0 29.8 28.6 34.0 39.1 Hockey (ice) .2 1.8 2.4 2.1 3.1 3.0 Hunting w/Bow & Arrow 4.7 5.0 6.6 5.7 6.2 5.1 Hunting with Firearms 19.2 17.7 19.6 19.5 18.8 16.4 In‐Line Roller Skating 19.2 16.0 13.1 10.7 7.9 6.1 Kayaking 3.5 4.7 7.6 5.9 4.9 7.1 Mountain Biking (off road) 6.3 8.2 9.2 9.3 8.4 6.0 Muzzleloading 3.0 3.1 4.1 3.6 3.8 3.1 Paintball Games 5.6 7.4 8.0 7.4 6.3 5.3 Running/Jogging 24.5 22.9 29.2 30.4 32.2 38.7 Skateboarding 9.6 9.0 12.0 10.1 8.4 6.6 Skiing (Alpine) 7.7 6.8 6.9 6.4 7.0 6.9 Skiing (Cross Country) 2.3 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.7 2.3 Snowboarding 5.3 6.3 6.0 5.1 6.2 5.1 Soccer 13.9 11.1 14.1 13.8 13.6 13.9 Softball 13.2 11.8 14.1 12.4 11.8 10.4 Swimming 54.8 47.0 58.0 52.3 50.2 46.0 Target Shooting 15.9 17.0 21.9 20.5 19.8 19.6 Target Shooting (Airgun) 2.9 3.8 6.7 6.6 5.2 5.3 Tennis 10.9 9.6 11.1 12.3 10.8 13.1 Volleyball 12.0 10.4 13.2 12.0 10.7 10.1 Water Skiing 5.5 5.5 6.7 5.3 5.2 4.3 Weight Lifting 21.2 25.9 35.5 33.2 34.5 29.1 Workout at Club 26.5 29.5 34.7 36.8 38.3 34.5 Wrestling 3.5 n/a n/a 2.1 3.0 3.2 Note: Participated more than once (in millions), seven (7) years of age and older. Source: NSGA 2012 A -20 City of Meridian, Idaho Youth Sports The 2013 SFIA sports participation report indicates that in 2012, youth (ages 6‐12) participation was highest for outdoor (63.1%), team (53.1%), and individual sports (49.8%). Children in this age group have increased interest in camping, while young adults ages 18–24 are becoming more interested in running/jogging. The NSGA “Youth Sports Participation Report” from 2001 – 2011 indicates that specific offerings for children’s fitness are slowly increasing in health and fitness facilities. Facilities are offering more youth‐ specific exercise equipment. Individualized youth sports training opportunities are becoming more popular as well. In 2011, in‐line roller skating experienced the largest percentage decrease in participation. For youth ages seven to 17 years, exercise walking, exercising with equipment, and swimming, followed by overnight/vacation camping had the highest number of participants in 2011.50 In 2009, an article in the Wall Street Journal observed that lacrosse had become one of the country’s fastest growing team sports. Participation in high school lacrosse has almost doubled this decade. An estimated 1.2 million Americans over age seven played lacrosse in 2009.51 A 2011 report, “U.S. Trends in Team Sports,” finds that lacrosse and other niche team sports and volleyball are continuing to experience strong growth for youth and adults.52 Adult Recreation: Pickleball No adult recreational sport is taking off faster than pickleball.53 Pickleball is a racquet sport played on a badminton court with a lowered net, perforated plastic ball and wood paddles. While it originated in the Pacific Northwest in the 1960s, it has grown exponentially since 2000. The USA Pickle ball Association (USAPA) estimates that there were about 500 pickleball players in 2000, with that number growing to 125,000 in 2013. It’s especially popular with the 50 plus crowd because it is low impact but gets the heart rate pumping.54 Pickle ball is an attractive programming option for recreation managers because it is adaptable to a variety of existing facilities – four pickleball courts fit in one tennis court. Outdoor Recreation The Outdoor Foundation releases a “Participation in Outdoor Recreation” report, annually. According to the 2014 report,55 while the actual number of outdoor recreation outings increased since 2012, the participation rate fell slightly, due to population growth. The foundation reports that the top outdoor activities in 2013 were running, fishing, bicycling, camping, and hiking. Birdwatching is also among the favorite outdoor activities by frequency of participation. 50“2011 vs 2001 Youth Sports Participation,” National Sporting Goods Association, 2012, http://www.nsga.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3494. 51 Evans and Trachtenberg, “Lacrosse Muscles its Way West,” Wall Street Journal, May, 2009. 52 “2011 Preview: U.S. Trends in Team Sports, Fall 2011,” SMGA, 2011. 53 Chris Gelbach, “Never Stop Playing: Trends in Adult Recreational Sports” Recreation Management, September 2013, http://recmanagement.com/feature_print.php?fid=201309fe02, Accessed January 2015. 54 David Crumpler, “Pickleball a fast‐growing sport, especially for the 50 and older crowd,” Florida Times Union, January 26, 2015, http://jacksonville.com/prime‐time/2015‐01‐26/story/pickleball‐fast‐growing‐sport‐especially‐50‐and‐older‐crowd, Accessed January 2015. 55 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 2014,” Outdoor Foundation, 2014. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-21 The Outdoor Foundation’s research brought the following key findings. Participation in Outdoor Recreation Return to Nature: Nearly 50% of Americans ages six and older participated in outdoor recreation in 2013. That equates to a total of 143 million. Top Five Biggest Participation Percentage Increase in Outdoor Activities in the Past three years (2014 Topline Report): Adventure Racing, Triathlon (Off Road), Stand up paddling, Kayak fishing, Recreational Kayaking. Recreation for Exercise: More than 70 percent of outdoor participants were motivated to recreate outdoors as a way of getting exercise. Youth Participation in Outdoor Recreation Good News about outdoor participation rates of female youth: Participation rates among girls and young women increased by two percentage points – bringing young women’s participation to the highest since 2006. The Influence of Family: Most youth are introduced to outdoor activities by parents, friends, family, and relatives. Physical education in schools: The importance cannot be understated. Among adults ages 18 and older who are current outdoor participants, 74% say they had PE in school between the ages of 6 and 12. Outdoor recreation trends are also a recurring topic of study by the United States Forest Service through the Internet Research Information Series (IRIS). An IRIS report dated January 201256 provides the following recent nature‐based outdoor recreation trends: Participation in walking for pleasure and family gatherings outdoors were the two most popular activities for the U.S. population as a whole. These outdoor activities were followed closely in popularity by viewing/ photographing wildlife, boating, fishing, snow/ice activities, and swimming. There has been a growing momentum in participation in sightseeing, birding, and wildlife watching in recent years. Trail Recreation and Cycling Trends For trail‐related recreation activities such as hiking, bicycling, and running, the 2014 “Outdoor Recreation Topline Report” indicates a positive three‐year trend for running/jogging, hiking, road biking, and BMX biking. Additionally, participation in trail running and mountain biking is up significantly over the past two to three years. 56 “Recent Outdoor Recreation Trends,” USDA Forest Service Internet Research Information Series (IRIS) Research Brief, January 2012, http://warnell.forestry.uga.edu/nrrt/nsre/IRISRec/ IRISRec23rpt.pdf, accessed August, 2012. A -22 City of Meridian, Idaho Table 15: Trail Recreation Participation by Activity (in thousands) (6 years of age or older) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 3 Year Change BMX Bicycling 1,904 1,811 2,369 1,547 2,175 2,168 1.9% Bicycling (Mountain/Non‐Paved Surface) 7,592 7,142 7,161 6,816 7,714 8,542 6.4% Bicycling (Road/Paved Surface) 38,114 40,140 39,320 40,349 39,232 40,888 1.4% Hiking (Day) 32,511 32,572 32,496 34,491 34,545 34,378 1.9% Running/Jogging 41,130 43,892 49,408 50,713 52,187 54,188 3.1% Trail Running 4,857 4,833 5,136 5,610 6,003 6,792 9.8% Source: Outdoor Foundation 2014. Other Cycling Trends Bicycle touring is becoming a fast‐growing trend around the world, including the U.S. and Canada. “Travelers are seeking out bike tours to stay active, minimize environmental impact, and experience diverse landscapes and cityscapes at a closer level.”57 Urban bike tours, popular in cycle‐friendly cities in Europe, are taking hold in the United States as well. Bikes and Hikes LA, an eco‐friendly bike and hike sightseeing company founded last September, offers visitors the opportunity to “see the city’s great outdoors while getting a good workout.” In New York, a hotel and a bike store are partnering to offer guests cruisers to explore the city during the summer of 2014.58 One of the newest trends in adventure cycling is “fat bike,” multiple speed bikes that are made to ride when other bikes can’t be ridden, with tires that are up to five inches wide run at low pressure for extra traction. Most fat bikes are used to ride on snow but they are also very effective for riding on any loose surface like sand or mud. They also work well on most rough terrain or just riding through the woods. This bike offers unique opportunities to experience nature in ways that would not be possible otherwise.59 Therapeutic Recreation Nationally, therapeutic recreation as a service is experiencing many struggles and challenges. The changing face of health care is having a dramatic effect on therapeutic recreation (TR) services in many rehabilitation settings and specifically in physical rehabilitation settings, thus affecting community recreation programs. A secondary issue caused by the decreased stay is the need for a clinical facility to promote community reintegration. In the past, clinical facilities provided programs such as wheelchair basketball, but due to the reduction of expenditures, facilities no longer provide such services and expect communities to address these needs. 57 Hope Nardini, “Bike Tourism a Rising Trend,” Ethic Traveler, http://www.ethicaltraveler.org/2012/08/bike‐tourism‐a‐rising‐ trend/, Accessed on Marcy 24, 2014. 58 Michelle Baran, “New trend: Urban bike tours in Los Angeles and New York,” Budget Travel Blog, http://www.budgettravel.com/blog/new‐trend‐urban‐bike‐tours‐in‐los‐angeles‐and‐new‐york,11772/, accessed on March 24, 2014 59 Steven Pease, “Fat bikes, how to get the most out of winter cycling,” Minnesota Cycling Examiner, http://www.examiner.com/article/fat‐bikes‐the‐latest‐trend‐adventure‐cycling, February 1, 2014. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-23 The fundamental goal of TR services is to enable participants to return successfully to their communities. This not only means they need to have the functional skill, but also that they have physical and social environments in the community that are receptive to the individual. Another trend is the renewed focus on serving people with psychiatric disabilities. In 2004, The National Council on Disability (NCD) issued a comprehensive report, “Livable Communities for Adults with Disabilities.”60 This report identified six elements for improving the quality of life for all citizens, including children, youth, and adults with disabilities. The six elements are: 1. Provides affordable, appropriate, accessible housing 2. Ensures accessible, affordable, reliable, safe transportation 3. Adjusts the physical environment for inclusiveness and accessibility 4. Provides work, volunteer, and education opportunities 5. Ensures access to key health and support services 6. Encourages participation in civic, cultural, social, and recreational activities The right to enjoy services and programs offered to all members by both public and private entities is the essence of the elements. Unlike persons with physical disabilities, people with psychiatric disabilities face attitudinal barriers of those around them. Attitudinal barriers are exemplified by policies, programs, and beliefs about psychiatric disabilities. Fortunately, the mental health system is moving toward a model based on recovery. This model believes that everyone with a mental health diagnosis is able and capable of living independently within the community with supports. G. Role and Response of Local Government Collectively, these trends have created profound implications for the way local governments conduct business. Some local governments are now accepting the role of providing preventative health care through parks and recreation services. The following concepts are from the International County/County Management Association.61 Parks & Recreation departments should take the lead in developing communities conducive to active living. There is growing support for recreation programs that encourage active living within their community. One of the highest priorities is a cohesive system of parks and trails and accessible neighborhood parks. In summary, the United States of America, its states, and its communities share the enormous task of reducing the health and economic burden of obesity. While numerous programs, policies, and products have been designed to address the problem, there is no magic bullet to make it go away. The role of public parks and recreation as a health promotion and prevention agency has come of age. What matters is refocusing its efforts to insure the health, well‐being, and economic prosperity of communities and citizens. 60 National Council on Disability, “Livable Communities for Adults with Disabilities,” December 2004, http://www.ncd.gov/publications/2004/12022004. 61 www.ICMA.org, Accessed in 2012. A -24 City of Meridian, Idaho Administration Trends for Recreation and Parks Municipal parks and recreation structures and delivery systems have changed, and more alternative methods of delivering services are emerging. Certain services are being contracted out and cooperative agreements with non‐profit groups and other public institutions are being developed. Newer partners include the health system, social services, justice system, education, the corporate sector, and community service agencies. These partnerships reflect both a broader interpretation of the mandate of parks and recreation agencies and the increased willingness of other sectors to work together to address community issues. The relationship with health agencies is vital in promoting wellness. The traditional relationship with education and the sharing of facilities through joint‐use agreements is evolving into cooperative planning and programming aimed at addressing youth inactivity levels and community needs. Listed below are additional administrative national trends: Level of subsidy for programs is lessening and more “enterprise” activities are being developed, thereby allowing subsidy to be used where deemed appropriate. Information technology allows for better tracking and reporting. Pricing is often determined by peak, off‐ peak, and off‐season rates. More agencies are partnering with private, public, and non‐profit groups. Agency Accreditation Parks and Recreation agencies are affirming their competencies and value through accreditation. This is achieved by an agency’s commitment to 150 standards. There are currently 116 agencies around the nation that have received the Commission for Accreditation of Parks and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA) accreditation. Accreditation is a distinguished mark of excellence that affords external recognition of an organization's commitment to quality and improvement. Accreditation has two fundamental purposes; to ensure quality and to ensure improvement. The National Recreation and Parks Association administratively sponsors two distinct accreditation programs. The Council on Accreditation of Parks, Recreation, Tourism and Related Professions (COAPRT) approves Academic institutions and Commission for Accreditation of Parks and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA) approves agencies. It is the only national accreditation of parks and recreation agencies, and is a valuable measure of an agency’s overall quality of operation, management, and service to the community. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-25 Additional benefits of CAPRA accreditation include: Boosts staff morale Encourages collaboration Improves program outcomes Identifies agency and cost efficiencies Builds high level of trust with the public Demonstrates promise of quality Identifies best management practices Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ‐ Compliance On September 14, 2010 the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued an amended regulation implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA 2010 Standards).62 On March 15, 2011 the amended Act became effective and, for the first time in history, it includes recreation environment design requirements. Covered entities were to be compliant with design and construction requirements and the development of three‐year transition plan by March 15, 2012. Implementation of the three‐year transition plan must be complete by March 15, 2015. Funding According to Recreation Management magazine’s “2014 State of the Industry Report,” survey respondents from parks and recreation departments/districts reporting about their revenues from 2011 through 2013 reveals the beginning of a recovery from the impact of the Recession of 2008. From 2011 to 2012, 82.6 percent of respondents reported that their revenues had either stabilized or had increased. This number grew to 84.8 percent of respondents when reporting on the 2012 to 2013 time frame, and by 2015, 95 percent of parks and recreation department respondents are expecting revenues to either increase (49.7%) or remain stable (45.4%). Marketing by Parks and Recreation Providers Niche marketing trends have experienced change more frequently than ever before as technology affects the way the public receives information. Web 2.0 tools and now Web 3.0 tools are a trend for agencies to use as a means of marketing programs and services. Popular social media marketing tools include: Facebook Twitter Instagram You Tube Pinterest LinkedIn Mobile marketing is a trend of the future. Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much higher rates than adults in age brackets 30 and older. Usage rates of mobile applications demonstrate that chronologically across four major age cohorts, Millennials tend to get information more frequently using mobile devices such as smart phones. For example, 95 percent of 18‐to‐29‐year‐old cell phone owners send and receive text messages, compared to 82 percent of 30‐to‐49‐year‐olds, 57 percent of 50‐to‐64‐year‐olds, and 19 percent of 65 and older. 62U.S. Department of Justice, Americans with Disabilities Act, ADA Home Page, http://www.ada.gov/, accessed on November 15, 2012. A -26 City of Meridian, Idaho It is also a fact that minority Americans lead the way when it comes to mobile internet access. Nearly two‐thirds of African‐Americans (64%) and Latinos (63%) are wireless internet users, and minority Americans are significantly more likely to own a cell phone than are their white counterparts (87 percent of Blacks and Hispanics own a cell phone, compared with 80 percent of whites).63 By 2015, mobile internet penetration is forecast to grow to 71.1% for Hispanics compared to 58.8% for whites.64 63Aaron Smith, “Mobile Access 2010,” Pew Internet and American Life Project, Pew Research Center, July 7, 2010, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile‐Access‐2010/Summary‐of‐Findings.aspx, Accessed on November 15, 2012. 64 Erik Sass, “Minority Groups Heaviest Users of Mobile Net,” Media Daily News, Nov. 18, 2011, http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/162699/minority‐groups‐heaviest‐users‐of‐mobile‐net.html#axzz2CK9zYGFw, Accessed on November 15, 2012. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-27 Appendix B – Community and Stakeholder Input THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Community and Stakeholder Input Public process for the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan was held January 26 – 28, 2015 and consisted of 125 participants in eight focus groups, eight stakeholder interviews, and a public forum. The community input summary is categorized below with brief details from the many focus group meetings. Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement The residents of Meridian benefit from a good geographic distribution of parks throughout the City, with some pockets of underserved areas. Participants embrace the fact that their parks form the heart of the community and feel like the programs offered are well run, diverse, affordable, and operated by dedicated employees, and, as such, indicate that they feel the quality of programs offered currently are very good. Participants also recognized that the parks are well maintained and have unique and innovative features. When asked about areas for improvement, participants identified the disconnected pathway system, the need for a larger indoor recreation facility, and the need to keep up with the city’s rapid growth as top priorities. Other general items, such as a perceived lack of parking, shade, field space for non‐traditional sports, and off‐leash dog areas were all identified as opportunities for improvement. Along with physical improvements, improvement of communication, and availability of information is also important to users. Satisfaction Residents are very satisfied with the programs, the quality of existing infrastructure, and maintenance. They also rated customer service and seeking community feedback as very good. Programming and Activities, and Locations Meridian residents love their programs and activities. They are very satisfied but do have an apparent demand for more year‐round program offerings. Included among the additional programs are more offerings for seniors and teens, special events, performing arts, outdoor recreation and adventure programs, non‐sports activities, and adaptive recreation. Two areas of the community were identified as being underserved, and may benefit from future park development. These were South and West Meridian. Certain demographics may also be underserved, including seniors and teens, as well as active adults and Millennials. New Facilities When asked for suggestions of new parks and recreation facilities in the City, participants identified: Pathway connectivity Fieldhouse/gym space Parks in South and West Meridian Additional athletic fields Large community center Exercise stations Performing Arts Center Iconic/Destination Parks Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -2- Values The City of Meridian residents value their parks and recreation system and feel like they get very good service from staff. Participants’ number one value was family‐oriented programming and activities. They also want good communication about happenings and program offerings. Quality and affordable programming is a priority, while ensuring access to diverse offerings throughout the entire city. Providing a balance between passive and active recreation, as well as organized sports and unstructured activities, is very important to the community. Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -3- Focus Group Questions 1) How long have you been a resident of Meridian? <5 years: 9 5‐9 years: 8 10‐19 years: 24 20+ years: 12 Not a resident but use programs / facilities: 21 2) What are the strengths of the Parks and Recreation Department that should be continued over the next several years? Partnerships****** High Quality Programs (quality over quantity)**** High Quality Parks**** Park Maintenance***** Parks well run and well maintained***** Innovative Unique Parks* Talented Forward Thinking Cooperative Staff*** Flexibility responsive and adapt to change** Safety & Security** Variety/Diversity of Activities* Ability to keep up with growth* Number of Parks Customer Service Friendly Atmosphere Teamwork Technology Family Oriented*** Internal Expertise Internal Support Young Park System Good geographic parks distribution Keep developing open space into parks and activities Responsive Soliciting input and feedback from community Community programs Special Events Commitment to Youth Committed Leadership Annual Investment in Infrastructure Wise water use methodologies Recycling Program Availability of Land Planning Lots of open space Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -4- Fishing Options Parking Playgrounds Volunteers Use funding well 3) Conversely, what are the major weaknesses that need to be addressed through the Parks and Recreation Master Plan? Disconnected Pathway System****** Lack of Parking at most parks during events*** Lack of Communication‐ Internal and External (Marketing and Public Relations)*** Lack of Facilities – open space, gymnasiums, ball fields, indoor classrooms, etc.*** Growing Pains – Demand and Fast Growth** Need more Youth Programs and Facilities* Lack of Dedicated Funding to develop new facilities* Lack of Open Field Ball Field Space for Diversity of Sports** Lack of Funding** Need a Large Recreation Center*** No year round disc golf* Lack of Off Leash Dog Parks** Lack of Shade and Mature Trees in Parks** Need indoor Aquatic Center* Need more splash pads* Need Indoor Performing Arts Center* Lack of Security Lack of Community Center Multipurpose Space for Community Organizations Short on Staff Lack of Capacity Opportunities for future park land diminishing Resting athletic field turf is challenging Need Asset Replacement Plan – Life Cycle of Capital Replacement Lack of quality of ball field lighting in parks Lack of Dedicated use facilities Need improved wayfinding signage and to trail connectivity Need Developers Impact requirement for trail connectivity Need more iconic parks (destination parks) Need a larger downtown park Need a Shade Policy for parks Lack of winter water availability – restrooms, irrigation, drinking fountains, etc. Traffic noise and shade around performance area in Need to add a vapor policy to the non‐smoking policy Need better operational partnerships such as sharing school facilities Need Comprehensive Plans with all City Departments Poor maintenance of ball fields at Gordon Harris Park (school facilities) Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -5- Over dependency on partnerships Website needs ability for online registration and reservations Need more seating in parks (shaded) Need more non‐bleacher seating at game fields Rely of Volunteers 4) How satisfied are you with the quality of current programs offered? Why? 5 Excellent ‐ 8 4 Very Good ‐ 28 3 Good ‐ 13 2 Fair ‐ 0 1 Poor ‐ 0 5) What additional programs or activities do you feel the Department should offer that are currently not available? Non‐sports Activities**** Aquatic Programs – Swim Lessons, Water Aerobics, etc.*** Teen Programs*** Community‐wide Special Events* Senior Programs* Pickleball** Indoor Hockey* Lacrosse* Outdoor Recreation and Adventure Programs**** Continuing Education Programs for all ages Mobile Rec – Traveling Programs Adaptive Recreation Programs Activities for Millennials Youth Sports More Leagues More Tournaments Drop‐in Programs – Gym, walking, workout, etc. Indoor Field House Sports Fishing / Fly Fishing – need more stocking, instruction Expand recreational equipment rental system at concession stands Improved Farmer’s Market Art in the Park Volunteer Maintenance Program – “Love Your Parks” Winter Programs for Youth Flag Football Hunter Education Classes Arts and Crafts Classes Performing Arts Programs* Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -6- Year round walking group 6) How satisfied are you with the overall quality of the existing park and recreation facilities provided by the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department? Why? 5 Excellent ‐ 19 4 Very Good ‐ 36 3 Good ‐ 6 2 Fair ‐ 1 1 Poor ‐ 0 7) How would you rate the overall level of maintenance at the facilities owned or operated by the Department? Please identify the location and specifics of any maintenance concerns. 5 Excellent ‐ 35 4 Very Good ‐ 25 3 Good ‐ 4 2 Fair ‐ 0 1 Poor ‐ 0 8) What improvements are needed at existing facilities? Where are these improvements needed? More Parking***** Shade in parks**** Upgraded and Renovate Community Center*** Upgrade lighting technology and modernization – timing, no bleed lights, etc.** Better maintain and/or repurpose Legion Baseball Field into a Softball Field, re‐grade, irrigation, lights, etc. – Storey Park** Ballfield lights* Pickleball markings on tennis courts* Frost free drinking fountains, irrigation, restrooms, etc.* Off leash dog areas in all parks* Concession Opportunities ‐ Upgrades Parking at Settlers Park – Develop a Parking Plan Beautify Pathways Band Shell at Kleiner Park ‐ Shade, Sound buffers, etc. Replacement of Adventure Island Playground surfacing Need more swings at parks More Pathway connectivity Air stations for bicycles in parks and on trails Water bottle stations in parks and on trails Healthy food and beverage options at concessions Policy Signage in Parks – smoking, off lease dog areas (Kleiner Park), etc. More dog pick‐up bags stations in parks & trails Electricity, Water and Sewer at Rodeo grounds ADA Accessibility Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -7- Conflict between neighborhood parks and sports events (parking, driving through neighborhoods, field designs, etc.) Better Quality Water Fountains in Parks Artificial / Synthetic Turf Website – Online registration and reservations Add restrooms at Settlers Park More shaded seating in parks More flowers and landscaping in parks Add security systems Flooding in Heroes Park Heavy grass clippings in some parks Renovate or repurpose the Community Center 9) Are there any portions of the community that are underserved? Please explain (i.e., where and what type of amenities are needed, what market segment needs more attention, etc.). South Meridian******* Dog Owners*** Teens*** Adventure Sports: Skateboarders, BMX Adaptive – Special Needs** Seniors / Active Adults** Biking Community** Youth Activities* Aquatics – Swimmers* Running Community Cat Owners Young Adults Homeless Competitive Club Soccer Equestrian Community New residents Lacrosse Community 10 mile and West East of Eagle (Industrial) 10) What additional park and recreation facilities would you like to see the community provide? Bike Pathway Connectivity***** Athletic Fields**** Fieldhouse including hard surface courts and indoor turf***** Indoor Aquatic Center (competitive and family leisure)****** Multipurpose Open Space to use for Athletic Fields**** Dog Parks with water facilities to swim in & dog agility facility**** Destination Softball Tournament Complex – 6 to 8 fields*** Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -8- Destination Baseball Tournament Complex – 6 to 8 fields*** Destination Multipurpose Rectangular Field Tournament Complex*** Large Community Center*** Botanical Gardens** Splash pads*** Indoor Tennis / Pickleball** Ice Rink** Pocket Parks, HOA parks* Lacrosse Fields* Exercise Fitness Trail* Year Round Disc Golf Course* Off leash dog areas** Multipurpose Parks (Active and Passive) Dedicated use facilities* Performing Arts Center* Natural Landscape Parks* Multipurpose Artificial / Synthetic Turf with Lights* Indoor Lacrosse (Box Lacrosse) Farmer’s Market Concessions Art themed parks Need more iconic parks (destination parks)* Need a larger downtown park Need a park on the West side Nature Reserve* Additional Community Gardening Arboretum Special Event Space with Large Outdoor Performance Space Shade Structures Historical and Cultural Park Skate park** Convention Center Picnic Shelters Picnic Areas Outdoor Shooting Range Sledding Hill on Southside Children’s Working Farm BMX Fishing pond south of the highway Climbing Wall, boulder area Wi‐Fi access at parks 11) Are there any facilities and/or programs currently available that should be eliminated? If so, which ones and why? Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -9- Adult Baseball at Story Park* Horseshoe Pits at Story Park Community Center Belly Dancing 12) How would you rate the quality of customer service provided by the Parks and Recreation staff? Please elaborate. 5 Excellent ‐ 42 4 Very Good ‐ 14 3 Good ‐ 0 2 Fair ‐ 0 1 Poor ‐ 0 13) How effective is the Department in seeking feedback from the community and users on improving its performance? 5 Excellent ‐ 23 4 Very Good ‐ 23 3 Good ‐ 2 Fair ‐ 2 1 Poor ‐ 0 14) The Parks and Recreation Department’s programs and facilities are currently funded through a combination of revenue sources, including General Fund, User Fees, Impact Fees, and Partnerships. Do you think this is an appropriate way to fund the department? Yes: 38 No: 2 Do Not Know: 14 15) Who are the key partners and stakeholders in the community with regards to assisting with the implementation of this plan? School District****** Youth Sports Organizations****** YMCA***** Boys & Girls Club**** Senior Center** Western Ada Recreation District – WARD** Service Clubs – Optimist, Lions Club, etc.*** Developers (including non‐residential property)*** Local Corporations / Business Community*** Library* Children’s Theater* Irrigation Districts** Transportation Agencies – ITD, MDC, Railroad, ACHD, COMPASS** User Groups and Daily Users*** PAL* Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -10- Faith Based Community* Boys/Girl Scouts* Tax Paying Residents* State and Local Governments (Idaho Fish and Game, adjacent municipalities)** Foundations (Albertson’s) Volunteers Community Clubs Meridian Arts Commission Meridian Downtown Business Society Regional Tennis Organizations Medical Community – Health Care, St. Luke’s Hospital, Central District Health Department, etc. Other City Departments* City Council Non‐governmental Organizations HOAs Land Owners* Speedway Owner 16) What are the key issues and values in the Meridian community that need to be considered while developing this Master Plan? Family Oriented******* Safety*** Accessibility*** Sustainability*** Quality** Aesthetics** Connectivity** Fiscally Responsible* Develop in underserved areas* Traffic / Drive Time* Community User Friendly Fun Affordability Identity Active Lifestyles** Partnerships* Suburban Design Civic Minded Inclusive Leadership Balance Active and Passive Activities Balance organized sports and unorganized sports activities Growth Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -11- Land Value Air Quality Historical & Cultural connection to farming and dairy Convenience Value of outdoor recreation* Economic Impact Value Key Identity for each park Destination amenities 17) Are there any political sensitivities we should be aware of that could impact the success of the city’s planning efforts? Conservative ‐ Do not raise taxes***** Fiscal Responsibility and Accountability** Government cannot fund and/or operate everything City of Meridian is not going to build Indoor Aquatic Center, Ice Rink, Performing Arts Center, Moore Brooks Legion Baseball Field Renovation Rodeo Grounds Trying to please all residents Sharing the open process to public City Council Support for Parks & Recreation Open Information Sharing of Future Needs Residents want it all but do not want to pay for it Educate public on benefits of new facilities Parks and Facilities West of 10 Mile Changing political landscape – elections Impacts to our providers* Diversity of the community Neighboring factors 18) During the next 5‐10 years, what are the top priorities for the Parks and Recreation Department? 1‐5 years Land Acquisition***** Pathway Connectivity**** Recreation Center*** Gymnasium Space** Field House**** Outdoor Rectangular Field space** Outdoor Diamond Field space** Partner better with school facilities* Regional Park in South Meridian** New Dog Park** New Neighborhood Parks in CIP* Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -12- Increase Development Impact Fee Policy In Lieu Of for Land Acquisition Endowment Fund* Maximize use of existing facilities**** Implement Master Plan* More public space South of Interstate* Staffing Plans Outdoor Spaces Pickleball Courts* Equipment to maintain new park amenities Life Cycle Plans* Upgrade Ball field Lighting Upgrade Story Park City Christmas Tree Shade Policy Funding Sources* Public Relations and Marketing Endowment for park maintenance (1%) with donation of land Sell the Quality of Life message to the public Focus on the priorities Create a position to solicit grants, sponsorships, private donations, etc. Develop West of 10 mile Upgrade Landscaping* Outdoor Recreation and Adventure Trips 10 Years Pathway Connectivity** Outdoor Rectangular Field space* Outdoor Diamond Field space* Indoor Recreational Space Implement Master Plan Increase in Staff Increase Partnerships* Additional Parking Develop undeveloped parks Aldape Park Forestry Upgrade New Neighborhood Parks in CIP Two new dog Parks Botanical Gardens Indoor Aquatic Center Additional park in South Meridian and North West Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-41 Appendix C – Survey Results THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY ........................................................ 1 DEMOGRAPHICS ...................................................................................... 2 CURRENT FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS ............................................... 6 PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES, AND SPECIAL EVENTS .............................. 28 VALUES AND VISION ............................................................................. 32 FUTURE FACILITIES, AMENITIES, AND SERVICES ............................. 37 COMMUNICATION .................................................................................. 43 FINANCIAL CHOICES/FEES ................................................................... 44 ADDITIONAL OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS ............................................. 47 Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. DEMOGRAPHICS • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 1: Demographic Profile Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 20% 40% 60% Percent of Respondents Female Male Under 35 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75 or over Single, no children Couple, no children Single with children at home Couple with children at home Single, children no longer at home Couple, children no longer at home Under $25,000 $25,000-49,999 $50,000-74,999 $75,000-99,999 $100,000-149,999 $150,000-199,999 $200,000-249,999 $250,000 or more 76% 24% 63% 37% 37% 19% 15% 12% 9% 7% 19% 36% 24% 12% 8% 2% 57% 19% 7% 6% 5% 6% 62% 16% 6% 9% 6% 1% 13% 18% 25% 17% 20% 5% 2% 1% 13% 23% 24% 25% 1% 9% 3% 3% Demographic Profile Average Invitation Sample Open Link 45.9 49.9 Average Invitation Sample Open Link $100,217 $79,496 Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 2: Residential Profile Invitation Sample Open Link 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent of Respondents 0% 50% 100% Percent of Respondents Where in the city do you live? South (south of I-84) Central (between I-84 and Cherry Lane/Fairview Ave.) Northwest (west of Meridian Rd. and nort.. Northeast (east of Meridian Rd. and north of Fairview Ave.) Other Number of Years Lived in Meridian Less than 1 1 to 3 4 to 10 11 to 20 21 or more Own vs. Rent Own Rent Other Household Need for ADA- Accessible Facilities Yes No 25% 22% 32% 22% 20% 11% 32% 23% 14% 32% 48% 19% 1% 10% 38% 31% 15% 7% 87% 11% 2% 85% 6% 9% 12% 88% 94% 6% Residential Profile Average Invitation Sample Open Link 12.0 16.5 Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. CURRENT FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS Figure 3: Importance of and Familiarity with Local Recreation Opportunities Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 4: Use of and Satisfaction with Classes and Programs Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 5: Most Used Facilities/Parks Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents Settlers Park Storey Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Tully Park Bear Creek Park Renaissance Park Gordon Harris Park Jabil Fields Chateau Park City Hall Plaza Community Center Heroes Park Heritage Middle School Ball Fields Generations Plaza Centennial Park 8th Street Park Seasons Park Champion Park 70% 53% 46% 39% 17% 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 3% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 80% 26% 58% 28% 17% 14% 12% 8% 4% 3% 7% 4% 7% 5% 1% 3% 1% 3% Top Three MPRD Facilities & Parks Used Most Often Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 6: Most Used Facilities/Parks by Area of Residence Invitation Sample Only Central Northeast Northwest South 0% 50% Percent of Respondents 0% 50% 100% Percent of Respondents 0% 50% 100% Percent of Respondents 20% 40% 60% Percent of Respondents Settlers Park Storey Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Tully Park Bear Creek Park Renaissance Park Gordon Harris Park Jabil Fields Chateau Park City Hall Plaza Community Center Heroes Park Heritage Middle School Ball Fields Generations Plaza Centennial Park 8th Street Park Seasons Park Champion Park 3% 0% 6% 5% 4% 8% 7% 6% 4% 5% 1% 3% 1% 6% 48% 39% 62% 67% 1% 1% 6% 10% 7% 22% 1% 1% 5% 32% 60% 49% 77% 4% 6% 1% 2% 6% 14% 3% 61% 36% 65% 86% 2% 0% 0% 4% 1% 0% 14% 3% 5% 1% 2% 24% 27% 52% 8% 48% 34% 47% Top Three MPRD Facilities & Parks Used Most Often - by Area of Residence Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 7: Most Used Facilities/Parks by Household Status Invitation Sample Only Children Present in Home No Children Present in Home 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Respondents Settlers Park Storey Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Tully Park Bear Creek Park Renaissance Park Gordon Harris Park Jabil Fields Chateau Park City Hall Plaza Community Center Heroes Park Heritage Middle School Ball Fields Generations Plaza Centennial Park 8th Street Park Seasons Park Champion Park 2% 1% 2% 0% 4% 7% 4% 1% 8% 8% 7% 9% 17% 45% 42% 51% 80% 3% 2% 4% 8% 3% 1% 6% 15% 2% 0% 7% 3% 16% 27% 51% 54% 51% Top Three MPRD Facilities & Parks Used Most Often - by Presence of Children in Household Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 8: Importance of Facilities Operated by MPRD – Percent Important vs. Not Important Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent of Respondents Pathways/Trails Playgrounds Picnic Shelters Community/Recreation Center Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Indoor Gym Space Splash Pads Athletic Fields Outdoor Basketball Courts Tennis Courts Ball Fields Dog Parks Rodeo Grounds 82% 7% 77% 12% 69% 19% 56% 16% 56% 16% 49% 24% 48% 30% 43% 26% 43% 32% 37% 37% 31% 29% 31% 35% 14% 62% Importance of Facilities Operated by MPRD - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Important) vs. % 1 & 2 (Not Important) Percent 4 & 5 (Important) Percent 1 & 2 (Not Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 9: Importance of Facilities Operated by MPRD – Average Rating Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating Pathways/Trails Playgrounds Picnic Shelters Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Community/ Recreation Center Indoor Gym Space Splash Pads Athletic Fields Outdoor Basketball Courts Ball Fields Tennis Courts Dog Parks Rodeo Grounds 4.2 4.4 4.1 4.1 3.8 4.1 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.3 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.8 3.1 3.1 2.9 3.2 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.2 2.1 Importance of Facilities Operated by MPRD Average Rating (1=Not at all Important, 5=Very Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 10: Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by Facilities Operated by MPRD – Percent Needs Met vs. Needs Unmet Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent of Respondents Playgrounds Athletic Fields Ball Fields Picnic Shelters Splash Pads Outdoor Basketball Courts Community/ Recreation Center Pathways/Trails Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Dog Parks Rodeo Grounds Tennis Courts Indoor Gym Space 84% 4% 73% 10% 69% 5% 67% 4% 59% 14% 57% 17% 55% 25% 50% 28% 44% 30% 41% 31% 38% 34% 38% 11% 25% 47% Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by MPRD Facilities - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Needs Met) vs. % 1 & 2 (Needs Unmet) Percent 4 & 5 (Needs Met) Percent 1 & 2 (Needs Unmet) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 11: Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by Facilities Operated by MPRD – Average Rating Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Needs Met Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Needs Met Rating Playgrounds Picnic Shelters Athletic Fields Ball Fields Splash Pads Outdoor Basketball Courts Tennis Courts Pathways/Trails Community/ Recreation Center Dog Parks Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Rodeo Grounds Indoor Gym Space 4.3 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.0 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.8 Degree to Which Household Needs Are Met by MPRD Facilities Average Rating (1=Not at all, 5=Completely) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 12: Current Facilities – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix Invitation Sample Only 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 How Well Needs Are Currently Being Met (Average Rating) 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Splash Pads Rodeo Grounds Picnic Shelters Outdoor Basketball Courts Community/Rec. Center Ball Fields Athletic Fields Tennis Courts Playgrounds Pathways/Trails Indoor Gym Space Dog Parks Fac Imp Fac Needs High Importance/ Low Needs Met High Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ Low Needs Met Level of Importance vs. Needs Met for Current MPRD Facilities - Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 13: Importance of Programs Operated by MPRD – Percent Important vs. Not Important Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Percent of Respondents Family Programs (All Ages) Youth Sports Youth Programs (Non-Sports) Senior Programs Outdoor Adventure Programs Youth Camps Teen Programs Adult Programs (Non-Sports) Adult Sports 69% 14% 64% 15% 57% 18% 50% 30% 50% 14% 41% 24% 40% 24% 36% 16% 31% 34% Importance of Programs Operated by MPRD - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Important) vs. % 1 & 2 (Not Important) Percent 4 & 5 (Important) Percent 1 & 2 (Not Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 14: Importance of Programs Operated by MPRD – Average Rating Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating Youth Sports Family Programs (All Ages) Outdoor Adventure Programs Youth Programs (Non-Sports) Senior Programs Adult Programs (Non-Sports) Youth Camps Teen Programs Adult Sports 3.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.5 2.9 3.6 Importance of Programs Operated by MPRD Average Rating (1=Not at all Important, 5=Very Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 15: Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by MPRD Programs – Percent Needs Met vs. Needs Unmet Invitation Sample Only 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% Percent of Respondents Senior Programs Youth Programs (Non-Sports) Adult Sports Youth Sports Teen Programs Family Programs (All Ages) Adult Programs (Non-Sports) Youth Camps Outdoor Adventure Programs 65% 11% 63% 6% 62% 8% 60% 6% 60% 9% 57% 12% 54% 9% 51% 9% 50% 14% Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by MPRD Programs - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Needs Met) vs. % 1 & 2 (Needs Unmet) Percent 4 & 5 (Needs Met) Percent 1 & 2 (Needs Unmet) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 16: Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by MPRD Programs – Average Rating Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Needs Met Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Needs Met Rating Youth Programs (Non-Sports) Youth Sports Senior Programs Adult Sports Teen Programs Youth Camps Adult Programs (Non-Sports) Family Programs (All Ages) Outdoor Adventure Programs 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.3 3.7 3.4 3.6 3.2 3.6 3.3 3.6 3.2 3.6 3.3 3.4 3.1 Degree to Which Household Needs Are Met by MPRD Programs Average Rating (1=Not at all, 5=Completely) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 17: Current Programs – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix Invitation Sample Only 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 How Well Needs Are Currently Being Met (Average Rating) 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 Youth Sports Youth Programs Youth Camps Family Programs Adult Programs Teen Programs Senior Programs Outdoor Adventure Programs Adult Sports Prog Needs Prog Imp High Importance/ Low Needs Met High Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ Low Needs Met Low Importance/ High Needs Met Level of Importance vs. Needs Met for Current MPRD Programs - Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES, AND SPECIAL EVENTS Figure 18: Household Need for Programs Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Respondents Community events Swim lessons/aquatic programs Fitness and wellness programs Summer camps - youth Family programs Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Adult programs (non-sports) Cooking/enrichment classes After school programs Youth sports camps Arts programs Volunteer opportunities Performing arts programs Athletic leagues - adult Outdoor adventure programs Teen programs Youth programs (non-sports) Intergenerational programs Adaptive recreation programs 70% 54% 52% 44% 44% 41% 34% 34% 32% 31% 30% 30% 28% 27% 27% 22% 21% 18% 7% 5% Household Need for Programs - Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 19: Household Need for Programs by Household Status Invitation Sample Only Children Present in Home No Children Present in Home 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents Community events Swim lessons/aquatic programs Fitness and wellness programs Summer camps - youth Family programs Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Adult programs (non-sports) Cooking/enrichment classes After school programs Youth sports camps Arts programs Volunteer opportunities Performing arts programs Athletic leagues - adult Outdoor adventure programs Teen programs Youth programs (non-sports) Intergenerational programs Adaptive recreation programs 73% 68% 52% 62% 51% 59% 17% 21% 34% 41% 43% 34% 26% 30% 35% 24% 30% 23% 6% 4% 64% 27% 52% 12% 30% 67% 58% 28% 12% 21% 31% 22% 11% 18% 10% 7% 7% 4% 8% 8% Household Need for Programs - by Presence of Children in Household Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 20: Top Three Most Important Programs to Add, Expand, or Improve Invitation Sample Only 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% Invitation Sample Community events Fitness and wellness programs Family programs Swim lessons/aquatic programs Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Teen programs Cooking/enrichment classes Adult programs (non-sports) Performing arts programs Volunteer opportunities Summer camps - youth Youth programs (non-sports) Athletic leagues - adult Outdoor adventure programs Youth sports camps Adaptive recreation programs Arts programs After school programs Intergenerational programs 21% 11% 16% 11% 14% 17% 10% 13% 12% 10% 7% 9% 3% 5% 8% 8% 7% 4% 5% 6% 4% 6% 7% 7% 4% 4% 3% 5% 6% 42% 31% 31% 28% 26% 19% 13% 12% 11% 10% 10% 9% 8% 7% 7% 6% 6% 5% 5% 2% Top Three Most Important Programs to Household - Invitation Sample Only Most Important Program Second Most Important Program Third Most Important Program Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 21: Top Three Most Important Programs to Add, Expand, or Improve Combined Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Percent of Respondents Community events Fitness and wellness programs Family programs Swim lessons/aquatic programs Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Teen programs Cooking/enrichment classes Adult programs (non-sports) Performing arts programs Volunteer opportunities Summer camps - youth Youth programs (non-sports) Athletic leagues - adult Outdoor adventure programs Youth sports camps Adaptive recreation programs Arts programs After school programs Intergenerational programs 2% 5% 5% 6% 6% 7% 7% 8% 9% 10% 10% 11% 12% 13% 19% 26% 28% 31% 31% 42% 1% 4% 10% 3% 9% 11% 22% 7% 14% 7% 10% 10% 9% 9% 13% 37% 31% 18% 24% 36% Top Three Most Important Programs to Household Combined Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. VALUES AND VISION Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 22: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Invitation Sample Only 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% Invitation Sample Pathway connectivity Promoting healthy, active lifestyles Family-oriented activities Maintenance of parks and facilities Safety and security Community-wide special events Aquatic facilities/programming Developing new parks in under-served areas Expanded classes and programs for all ages Balance of organized sports and passive park facilities Land preservation/acquisition Accessibility Public art and landscaped areas Volunteer opportunities Customer service Leveraging partnerships 33% 11% 12% 11% 14% 13% 13% 14% 13% 10% 4% 3% 8% 8% 5% 9% 7% 8% 3% 4% 4% 3% 9% 4% 3% 5% 7% 4% 5% 5% 6% 4% 3% 44% 33% 30% 25% 25% 25% 24% 16% 16% 16% 11% 8% 5% 4% 3% 2% Top Three Community Issues for MPRD - Invitation Sample Only Top Community Issue for Parks & Rec. Second Community Issue for Parks & Rec. Third Community Issue for Parks & Rec. Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 23: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined Invitation Sample Only Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Respondents Pathway connectivity Promoting healthy, active lifestyles Family-oriented activities Maintenance of parks and facilities Safety and security Community-wide special events Aquatic facilities/programming Developing new parks in under-served areas Expanded classes and programs for all ages Balance of organized sports and passive park facilities Land preservation/acquisition Accessibility Public art and landscaped areas Volunteer opportunities Customer service Leveraging partnerships 44% 33% 30% 25% 25% 25% 24% 16% 16% 16% 11% 8% 5% 4% 3% 2% 53% 17% 30% 25% 16% 17% 28% 29% 12% 22% 15% 4% 5% 5% 1% 2% Top Three Community Issues for MPRD Combined Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 24: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined by Area of Residence Invitation Sample Only Central Northeast Northwest South 0% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 50% Percent of Respondents 0% 20% 40% Percent of Respondents 20% 40% 60% Percent of Respondents Pathway connectivity Promoting healthy, active lifestyles Family-oriented activities Maintenance of parks and facilities Safety and security Community-wide special events Aquatic facilities/programming Developing new parks in under-served areas Expanded classes and programs for all ages Balance of organized sports and passive park facilities Land preservation/acquisition Accessibility Public art and landscaped areas Volunteer opportunities Customer service Leveraging partnerships 52% 21% 26% 23% 28% 16% 32% 13% 13% 14% 16% 7% 7% 6% 7% 5% 44% 61% 39% 16% 44% 33% 17% 11% 4% 8% 3% 7% 5% 6% 3% 34% 36% 36% 22% 32% 34% 22% 19% 8% 8% 9% 8% 3% 3% 1% 50% 16% 18% 38% 21% 16% 26% 38% 10% 18% 16% 7% 4% 3% 2% 5% Top Three Community Issues for MPRD Combined - by Area of Residence Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 25: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined by Household Status Invitation Sample Only Children Present in Home No Children Present in Home 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents Pathway connectivity Promoting healthy, active lifestyles Family-oriented activities Maintenance of parks and facilities Safety and security Community-wide special events Aquatic facilities/programming Developing new parks in under-served areas Expanded classes and programs for all ages Balance of organized sports and passive park facilities Land preservation/acquisition Accessibility Public art and landscaped areas Volunteer opportunities Customer service Leveraging partnerships 46% 38% 36% 25% 19% 24% 30% 16% 17% 16% 9% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 41% 25% 19% 24% 35% 27% 13% 18% 15% 14% 14% 15% 9% 6% 6% 1% Top Three Community Issues for MPRD Combined - by Presence of Children in Household Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. FUTURE FACILITIES, AMENITIES, AND SERVICES Figure 26: Three Areas that, if Addressed, Would Increase Your Use of MPRD Facilities Invitation Sample Only 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% Percent of Respondents Awareness of programs (communications) Shade Additional facilities and amenities Pricing/user fees Accessibility Safety and security Parking Condition/maintenance of parks or buildings Quality of equipment Programs I want Customer service/staff knowledge Hours of operation 3% 3% 6% 8% 9% 12% 15% 19% 20% 38% 51% 55% What are the three most important areas that, if addressed by the City, would in- crease your utilization of MPRD facilities? - Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • o o o o o • o o o o o o o o o o o o o Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 27: Importance of Adding/Expanding/Improving MPRD Facilities – Percent Important vs. Not Important Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Respondents Community/Recreation Center Indoor Aquatics Facility Ice Rink Fieldhouse/Gymnasium Space Performing Arts Center 12% 62% 12% 62% 31% 41% 18% 38% 17% 36% Indoor Facilities Importance of Potential Future Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Important) vs. % 1 & 2 (Not Important) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Respondents Shade Structures in Parks Pathways & Trails Improved Park Amenities Playgrounds Lights for Outdoor Athletic Facilities Fishing Ponds Public Art in the Parks Splash Pads Dog Parks Exercise Stations Along Trails in Parks New Parks Outdoor Athletic Fields/Courts Parking at Recreational Facilities Disc Golf Rodeo/Equestrian Facility Pickleball Courts 78% 6% 78% 5% 11% 70% 11% 65% 17% 49% 30% 42% 27% 40% 25% 40% 33% 39% 26% 39% 18% 33% 20% 31% 25% 28% 37% 20% 52% 9% 43% 7% Outdoor Facilities Percent 4 & 5 (Important) Percent 1 & 2 (Not Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 28: Importance of Adding/Expanding/Improving MPRD Facilities – Average Rating Invitation Sample Only Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating Indoor Aquatics Facility Community/Recreation Center Fieldhouse/Gymnasium Space Performing Arts Center Ice Rink 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.7 Indoor Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating Pathways & Trails Shade Structures in Parks Improved Park Amenities Playgrounds Lights for Outdoor Athletic Facilities New Parks Exercise Stations Along Trails in Parks Splash Pads Outdoor Athletic Fields/Courts Public Art in the Parks Fishing Ponds Parking at Recreational Facilities Dog Parks Disc Golf Pickleball Courts Rodeo/Equestrian Facility 4.1 4.3 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.4 3.8 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.3 3.1 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.1 3.7 3.0 3.1 2.6 2.9 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.1 Outdoor Importance of Potential Future Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Average Rating (1=Not at all Important, 5=Very Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 29: Top Three Most Important Facilities to Add, Expand, or Improve Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Invitation Sample Pathways & trails Indoor aquatics facility Community/recreation center Improved park amenities Shade structures in parks Dog parks Playgrounds Outdoor athletic fields/courts Fishing ponds New parks Exercise stations along trails in parks Ice rink Performing arts center Public Art in the Parks Splash pads Lights for outdoor athletic facilities Disc golf Parking at recreational facilities Fieldhouse/gymnasium space Other (indoor or outdoor) Rodeo/equestrian facility No second or third priority listed Pickleball courts 14% 11% 16% 10% 11% 21% 14% 13% 14% 7% 4% 5% 4% 7% 7% 7% 6% 3% 5% 6% 4% 7% 8% 5% 6% 9% 4% 4% 2% 49% 33% 26% 22% 22% 18% 16% 13% 12% 11% 11% 10% 9% 8% 8% 6% 5% 5% 4% 4% 3% 2% 1% Top Three Indoor & Outdoor Facilities to Add, Expand, or Improve - Invitation Sam- ple Only Highest Priority to Be Added/Expanded/Improved Second Priority to Be Added/Expanded/Improved Third Priority to Be Added/Expanded/Improved Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 30: Top Three Most Important Facilities to Add, Expand, or Improve Combined Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 20% 40% 60% Percent of Respondents 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents Pathways & trails Indoor aquatics facility Community/recreation center Improved park amenities Shade structures in parks Dog parks Playgrounds Outdoor athletic fields/courts Fishing ponds New parks Exercise stations along trails in parks Ice rink Performing arts center Public Art in the Parks Splash pads Lights for outdoor athletic facilities Disc golf Parking at recreational facilities Fieldhouse/gymnasium space Other (indoor or outdoor) Rodeo/equestrian facility Pickleball courts 49% 33% 26% 22% 22% 18% 16% 13% 12% 11% 11% 10% 9% 8% 8% 6% 5% 5% 4% 4% 3% 1% 43% 34% 21% 27% 18% 20% 17% 11% 13% 13% 17% 5% 6% 5% 9% 5% 8% 7% 7% 2% 1% 4% Top Three Indoor & Outdoor Facilities to Add, Expand, or Improve Combined Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. COMMUNICATION Figure 31: Current Methods of Receiving Information and Best Method for Reaching You Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. FINANCIAL CHOICES/FEES Figure 32: How do you feel about the current program and facility fees charged by MPRD? Current Facility Fees Current Program Fees 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Respondents 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Respondents Fees are underpriced for the value received Fees are acceptable for the value received Fees are too high for the value received Don't know/ unsure 2% 2% 1% 2% 30% 48% 29% 54% 11% 7% 14% 8% 57% 43% 56% 36% How do you feel about the current program and facility fees charged directly to you by MPRD? Invitation Sample Open Link Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 33: Potential Impact of Fee Increases on Current Level of Participation Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 34: Allocation of Funding Towards Facilities/Services/Programs – Average Allocation Amount Invitation Sample Open Link $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 Average Amount Allocated $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 Average Amount Allocated Expand aquatics Add more pathways Make improvements and/or renovate and maintain existing park facilities Expand programs and activities Recreation center Add new parks Add outdoor athletic fields and courts New or expanded Community Center Provide more City-wide special events Other enhancements $17.69 $11.29 $19.44 $12.62 $8.75 $8.63 $6.16 $3.27 $7.14 $5.02 $16.29 $10.79 $16.84 $11.74 $10.91 $5.85 $5.79 $6.59 $5.37 $9.82 If you had $100 to spend on parks and recreation facilities, services, and/or pro- grams, how would you allocate that $100 across the following categories? Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. ADDITIONAL OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-97 Appendix D – Sample Sponsorship Policy THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Sample XX Parks & Recreation Department Sponsorship Policy Created for XX by: 211 N. Public Road, Suite 225 Lafayette, CO 80026 Phone: (303) 439‐8369 Fax: (303) 664‐5313 Info@GreenPlayLLC.com www.GreenPlayLLC.com © 2003, 2008, 2012 © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 2 XX Parks & Recreation Department Sponsorship Policy Introduction The following guidelines in this Sponsorship Policy have been specifically designed for the XX Parks & Recreation Department, while considering that these guidelines may be later adapted and implemented on a city‐wide basis. Some assumptions regarding this policy are: Partnerships for recreation and parks facilities and program development may be pursued based on the XX Partnership Policy, encouraging the development of partnerships for the benefit of the city, its citizens, and potential partners. Sponsorships are one type of partnership, and one avenue of procurement for alternative funding resources. The Sponsorship Policy may evolve as the needs of new projects and other City departments are incorporated into its usage. Broad guidelines are offered in this policy primarily to delineate which types of sponsors and approval levels are currently acceptable for the XX Parks & Recreation Department. The policy should ensure that the definition of potential sponsors may include non‐ commercial community organizations (for example: YMCAs and Universities), but does not include a forum for non‐commercial speech or advertising. Sponsorships are clearly defined and are different from advertisements. Advertisements are one type of benefit that may be offered to a sponsor in exchange for cash or in‐kind sponsorship. The difference between sponsors and donors must be clarified, as some staff and the public often confuse and misuse these terms. Structure Part A of this document gives the Sponsorship Policy Part B gives the Levels of Sponsorship Tiers and Benefits Part C provides the vocabulary and Glossary of Sponsorship Terms © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 3 Part A. Sponsorship Policy XX Parks & Recreation Department I. Purpose In an effort to utilize and maximize the community’s resources, it is in the best interest of the City’s Parks & Recreation Department to create and enhance relationship‐based sponsorships. This may be accomplished by providing local, regional, and national commercial businesses and non‐profit groups a method for becoming involved with the many opportunities provided by the Parks & Recreation Department. The Department delivers quality, life‐enriching activities to the broadest base of the community. This translates into exceptional visibility for sponsors and supporters. It is the goal of the Department to create relationships and partnerships with sponsors for the financial benefit of the Department. Sponsorships vs. Donations It is important to note that there is a difference between a sponsorship and a philanthropic donation. Basically, sponsorships are cash or in‐kind products and services offered by sponsors with the clear expectation that an obligation is created. The recipient is obliged to return something of value to the sponsor. The value is typically public recognition and publicity or advertising highlighting the contribution of the sponsor and/or the sponsor’s name, logo, message, products, or services. The Sponsor usually has clear marketing objectives that they are trying to achieve, including but not limited to the ability to drive sales directly based on the sponsorship, and/or quite often, the right to be the exclusive sponsor in a specific category of sales. The arrangement is typically consummated by a letter of agreement or contractual arrangement that details the particulars of the exchange. In contrast, a donation comes with no restrictions on how the money or in‐kind resources are used. This policy specifically addresses sponsorships, the agreements for the procurement of the resources, and the benefits provided in return for securing those resources. Since donations or gifts come with no restrictions or expected benefits for the donor, a policy is generally not needed. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 4 II. Guidelines for Acceptable Sponsorships Sponsors should be businesses, non‐profit groups, or individuals that promote mutually beneficial relationships for the Parks & Recreation Department. All potentially sponsored properties (facilities, events, or programs) should be reviewed in terms of creating synergistic working relationships with regard to benefits, community contributions, knowledge, and political sensitivity. All sponsored properties should promote the goals and mission of the Parks & Recreation Department as follows: NEED SPECIFIC MISSION STATEMENT Sample XX Parks & Recreation Mission Statement: NEED SPECIFIC GOALS Sample Goals of the Park & Recreation Department: III. Sponsorship Selection Criteria A. Relationship of Sponsorship to Mission and Goals The first major criterion is the appropriate relationship of a sponsorship to the above outlined Parks & Recreation Department’s Mission and Goals. While objective analysis is ideal, the appropriateness of a relationship may sometimes be necessarily subjective. This policy addresses this necessity by including Approval Levels from various levels of City management staff and elected officials, outlined in Section B, to help assist with decisions involving larger amounts and benefits for sponsorship. The following questions are the major guiding components of this policy and should be addressed prior to soliciting potential sponsors: Is the sponsorship reasonably related to the purpose of the facility or programs as exemplified by the Mission Statement and Goals of the Department? Will the sponsorship help generate more revenue and/or less cost per participant than the City can provide without it? What are the real costs, including staff time, for procuring the amount of cash or in‐ kind resources that come with the generation of the sponsorship? Sponsorships which shall NOT be considered are those which: Promote environmental, work, or other practices that, if they took place in the City, would violate U.S. or state law (i.e., dumping of hazardous waste, exploitation of child labor, etc.), or promote drugs, alcohol, or tobacco, or that constitute violations of law. Duplicate or mimic the identity or programs of the Parks & Recreation Department or any of its divisions. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 5 Exploit participants or staff members of the Department. Offer benefits which may violate other accepted policies or the Sign Code. DO YOU HAVE A SIGN CODE? B. Sponsorship Plan and Approval Levels Each project or program that involves solicitation of Sponsors should, PRIOR to procurement, create a Sponsorship Plan specific to that project or program that is in line with the Sponsorship Levels given in Part B. This plan needs to be approved by the Management Team Members supervising the project and in accordance to City Partnership, Sponsorship, and Sign Code policies. In addition, each sponsorship will need separate approval if they exceed pre‐specified limits. The Approval Levels are outlined below: Under $1,000 The program or project staff may approve this level of Agreement, with review by their supervising Management Team Member. $1,001 to $10,000 The Agreement needs approval of a Management Team Member. $10,001 to $25,000 The Agreement needs approval of the entire Senior Management Team and Department Director. Over $25,000 The Agreement needs approval of the City Supervisor (the City Supervisor may recommend a City Council or Board of Trustees review). C. No Non‐Commercial Forum is Permitted This criterion deals with the commercial character of a sponsorship message. The City intends to create a limited forum, focused on advertisements incidental to commercial sponsorships of Parks & Recreation facilities and programs. While non‐commercial community organizations or individuals may wish to sponsor Department activities or facilities for various reasons, no non‐commercial speech is permitted in the limited forum created by this policy. Advertisements incidental to commercial sponsorship must primarily propose a commercial transaction, either directly, through the text, or indirectly, through the association of the sponsor’s name with the commercial transaction of purchasing the commercial goods or services which the sponsor sells. The reasons for this portion of the Policy include: (1) The desirability of avoiding non‐commercial proselytizing of a “captive audience” of event spectators and participants. (2) The constitutional prohibition on any view‐point related decisions about permitted advertising coupled with the danger that the City and the Parks & Recreation Department would be associated with advertising anyway. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 6 (3) The desire of the City to maximize income from sponsorship, weighed against the likelihood that commercial sponsors would be dissuaded from using the same forum commonly used by persons wishing to communicate non‐ commercial messages, some of which could be offensive to the public. (4) The desire of the City to maintain a position of neutrality on political and religious issues. (5) In the case of religious advertising and political advertising, specific concerns about the danger of “excessive entanglement” with religion (and resultant constitutional violations) and the danger of election campaign law violations, respectively. Guidelines for calculating the Levels of Sponsorship Tiers and Benefits are provided and outlined in Part B. IV. Additional Guidelines for Implementation A. Equitable Offerings It is important that all sponsorships of equal levels across divisions within Parks & Recreation yield the same value of benefits for potential sponsors. B. Sponsorship Contact Database A designated staff person or representative of the Parks & Recreation Department will keep an updated list of all current sponsors, sponsored activities, and contacts related to sponsorship. Purpose of Maintaining the Database: Limit duplicate solicitations of one sponsor Allow management to make decisions based on most appropriate solicitations and levels of benefits offered Keep a current list of all Department supporters and contacts Help provide leads for new sponsorships, if appropriate For staff below Management Team level, access to the database will be limited to printouts of listings of names of sponsors and their sponsored events. This limited access will provide information to help limit duplicated solicitations, and will also protect existing sponsor relationships, while allowing the evaluation of future sponsorships to occur at a management level. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 7 If a potential sponsor is already listed, staff should not pursue a sponsorship without researching the sponsor’s history with the most recently sponsored division. If more than one division wishes to pursue sponsorship by the same company, the Management Team shall make a decision based on several variables, including but not limited to: History of sponsorship, relationships, and types of sponsorship needed. Amount of funding available. Best use of funding based on departmental priorities. C. Sponsorship Committee A committee consisting of the supervisors of each program using sponsorships and other management team designees shall meet twice per year to review the database, exchange current contract samples, and recommend adjusting benefit levels and policy as needed. Changes shall not take effect before approval by the Management Team. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 9 Part B. Levels of Sponsorship Tiers and Benefits The following tiers are presented as a guideline for types of benefits that may be presented as opportunities for potential sponsors. Each sponsorship will most likely need to be individually negotiated. One purpose for these guidelines is to create equity in exchanges across sponsorship arrangements. While for the sake of ease the examples given for levels are based on amount of sponsorship requested, the level of approval needed from City staff is really based on the amount of benefits exchanged for the resources. The levels of approval are necessary because the costs and values for different levels of benefits may vary, depending on the sponsorship. It is important to note that these values may be very different. Sponsors will not typically offer to contribute resources that cost them more than the value of resources that they will gain and, typically, seek at least a 2‐1 return on their investment. Likewise, the City should not pursue sponsorships unless the total value the City receives is greater than its real costs. A hierarchy of Sponsors for events, programs, or facilities with more than one sponsor is listed below from the highest level to the lowest. Not all Levels will necessarily be used in each Sponsorship Plan. Note that the hierarchy is not dependent on specific levels or amounts of sponsorship. Specific levels and amounts should be designed for each property before sponsorships are procured within the approved Sponsorship Plan. Complete definitions of terms are included in Part C. Hierarchy of Sponsorship Levels (highest to lowest) Parks and Recreation Department‐Wide Sponsor Facility/Park Title or Primary Sponsor Event/Program Title or Primary Sponsor Presenting Sponsor (Facility, Event, or Program) Facility/Park Sponsor Program/Event Sponsor Media Sponsor Official Supplier Co‐sponsor © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 10 This hierarchy will help decide the amounts to ask various sponsors for, and will determine what levels of benefits to provide. It is important to build flexibility and choice into each level so that sponsors can have the ability to choose options that will best fit their objectives. Note that the benefits listed under each level are examples of value. The listing does not mean that all of the benefits should be offered. It is a menu of options for possible benefits, depending on the circumstances. These are listed primarily as a guideline for maximum benefit values. It is recommended that each project create a project‐specific Sponsorship Plan for approval in advance of Sponsorship procurement, based on the benefits available and the values specific to the project. I. Sponsorship Assets and Related Benefits Inventory TO BE DETERMINED FOR EACH AGENCY BASED ON OFFERINGS (PROPERTIES), VALUATION, AND DETERMINED BENEFITS A tiered structure of actual values and approval levels should be determined as part of a Sponsorship Plan. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 11 Part C. Glossary of Sponsorship Terms Activation The marketing activity a company conducts to promote its sponsorship. Money spent on activation is over and above the rights fee paid to the sponsored property. Also known as leverage. Advertising The direct sale of print or some other types of City communication medium to provide access to a select target market. Ambush Marketing A promotional strategy whereby a non‐sponsor attempts to capitalize on the popularity/prestige of a property by giving the false impression that it is a sponsor. Often employed by the competitors of a property’s official sponsors. Audio Mention The mention of a sponsor during a TV or radio broadcast. Business‐to‐Business Sponsorship Programs intended to influence corporate purchase/awareness, as opposed to individual consumers. Category Exclusivity The right of a sponsor to be the only company within its product or service category associated with the sponsored property. Cause Marketing Promotional strategy that links a company’s sales campaign directly to a non‐profit organization. Generally includes an offer by the sponsor to make a donation to the cause with purchase of its product or service. Unlike philanthropy, money spent on cause marketing is a business expense, not a donation, and is expected to show a return on investment. Co‐sponsors Sponsors of the same property. CPM (Cost per Thousand) The cost to deliver an ad message to a thousand people. Cross‐Promotions A joint marketing effort conducted by two or more co‐sponsors using the sponsored property as the central theme. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 12 Donations Cash or in‐kind gifts that do not include any additional negotiated conditions in return. Synonyms: Philanthropy, Patronage. Editorial Coverage Exposure that is generated by media coverage of the sponsored property that includes mention of the sponsor. Emblem A graphic symbol unique to a property. Also called a mark. Escalator An annual percentage increase built into the sponsorship fee for multi‐year contracts. Escalators are typically tied to inflation. Exclusive Rights A company pays a premium or provides economic benefit in exchange for the right to be the sole advertised provider, at the most competitive prices, of goods purchased by consumers within Parks & Recreation Department facilities and parks. Fulfillment The delivery of benefits promised to the sponsor in the contract. Hospitality Hosting key customers, clients, government officials, employees, and other VIPs at an event or facility. Usually involves tickets, parking, dining, and other amenities, often in a specially designated area, and may include interaction with athletes. In‐Kind Sponsorship Payment (full or partial) of sponsorship fee in goods or services rather than cash. Licensed Merchandise Goods produced by a manufacturer (the licensee) who has obtained a license to produce and distribute the official Marks on products such as clothing and souvenirs. Licensee Manufacturer which has obtained a license to produce and distribute Licensed Merchandise. Licensing Right to use a property’s logos and terminology on products for retail sale. Note: While a sponsor will typically receive the right to include a property’s marks on its packaging and advertising, sponsors are not automatically licensees. Mark Any official visual representation of a property, including emblems and mascots. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 13 Mascot A graphic illustration of a character, usually a cartoon figure, used to promote the identity of a property. Media Equivalencies Measuring the exposure value of a sponsorship by adding up all the coverage it generated and calculating what it would have cost to buy a like amount of ad time or space in those outlets based on media rate cards. Media Sponsor TV and radio stations, print media, and outdoor advertising companies that provide either cash, or more frequently advertising time or space, to a property in exchange for official designation. Municipal Marketing Promotional strategy linking a company to community services and activities (sponsorship of parks and recreation programs, libraries, etc.) Option to Renew Contractual right to renew a sponsorship on specified terms. Philanthropy Support for a non‐profit property where no commercial advantage is expected. Synonym: Patronage. Perimeter Advertising Stationary advertising around the perimeter of an arena or event site, often reserved for sponsors. Premiums Souvenir merchandise, produced to promote a sponsor’s involvement with a property (customized with the names/logos of the sponsor and the property). Presenting Sponsor The sponsor that has its name presented just below that of the sponsored property. In presenting arrangements, the event/facility name and the sponsor name are not fully integrated since the word(s) “presents” or “presented by” always come between them. Primary Sponsor The sponsor paying the largest fee and receiving the most prominent identification (Would be naming rights or title sponsor if sponsored property sold name or title). Property A unique, commercially exploitable entity (could be a facility, site, event, or program) Synonyms: sponsee, rightsholder, seller. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 14 Right of First Refusal Contractual right granting a sponsor the right to match any offer the property receives during a specific period of time in the sponsor’s product category. Selling Rights The ability of a sponsor to earn back some or all of its sponsorship fee selling its product or service to the property or its attendees or members. Signage Banners, billboards, electronic messages, decals, etc., displayed on‐site and containing sponsors ID. Sole Sponsor A company that has paid to be the only sponsor of a property. Sponsee A property available for sponsorship. Sponsor An entity that pays a property for the right to promote itself and its products or services in association with the property. Sponsor ID Visual and audio recognition of sponsor in property’s publications and advertising; public‐address and on‐air broadcast mentions. Sponsorship The relationship between a sponsor and a property, in which the sponsor pays a cash or in‐kind fee in return for access to the commercial potential associated with the property. Sponsorship Agency A firm which specializes in advising on, managing, brokering, or organizing sponsored properties. The agency may be employed by either the sponsor or property. Sponsorship Fee Payment made by a sponsor to a property. Sports Marketing Promotional strategy linking a company to sports (sponsorship of competitions, teams, leagues, etc.). Supplier Official provider of goods or services in exchange for designated recognition. This level is below official sponsor, and the benefits provided are limited accordingly. Title Sponsor The sponsor that has its name incorporated into the name of the sponsored property. © 2003, 2008, 2012 GreenPlay LLC ‐ Sample Parks & Recreation Department –Sample Sponsorship Policy 15 Venue Marketing Promotional strategy linking a sponsor to a physical site (sponsorship of stadiums, arenas, auditoriums, amphitheaters, racetracks, fairgrounds, etc.) Web Sponsorship The purchase (in cash or trade) of the right to utilize the commercial potential associated with a site on the World Wide Web, including integrated relationship building and branding. Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-115 Appendix E – Sample Partnership Policy THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Sample Partnership Policy and Proposal Format Created By: www.greenplayllc.com Phone: 303-439-8369 Email: info@greenplayllc.com www.greenplayllc.com © 2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 2 Sample Parks and Recreation Department Partnership Policy And Proposal Format Table of Contents Part One Page I. The Sample Parks and Recreation Department Partnership Policy A. Purpose 3 B. Background and Assumptions 4 C. Partnership Definition 5 D. Possible Types of Partners 6 E. Sponsorships 7 F. Limited Decision-Making Partnerships 8 G. Benefits of Partnerships 8 II. The Partnering Process 9 III. The Partnership Evaluation Process A. Mission and Goals 13 B. Other Considerations 13 C. Selection Criteria 15 D. Additional Assistance 16 Part Two The “Proposed Partnership Outline Format” 17 Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 3 I. Sample Parks and Recreation Department Partnership Policy A. Purpose This policy is designed to guide the process for XX Parks and Recreation Department in their desire to partner with private, non-profit, or other governmental entities for the development, design, construction, and operation of possibly partnered recreational facilities and/or programs that may occur on City property. The XX Parks and Recreation Department would like to identify for-profit, non-profit, and governmental entities that are interested in proposing to partner with the City to develop recreational facilities and/or programs. A major component in exploring any potential partnership will be to identify additional collaborating partners that may help provide a synergistic working relationship in terms of resources, community contributions, knowledge, and political sensitivity. These partnerships should be mutually beneficial for all proposing partners including the City, and particularly beneficial for the citizens of the community. This policy document is designed to: • Provide essential background information. • Provide parameters for gathering information regarding the needs and contributions of potential partners. • Identify how the partnerships will benefit the Sample Parks and Recreation Department and the community. Part Two: The “Proposed Partnership Outline Format,” provides a format that is intended to help guide Proposing Partners in creating a proposal for review by Sample Parks and Recreation Department staff. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 4 B. Background and Assumptions Partnerships are being used across the nation by governmental agencies in order to utilize additional resources for their community’s benefit. Examples of partnerships abound, and encompass a broad spectrum of agreements and implementation. The most commonly described partnership is between a public and a private entity, but partnerships also occur between public entities and non-profit organizations and/or other governmental agencies. Note on Privatization: This application is specific for proposed partnering for new facilities or programs. This information does not intend to address the issue of privatization, or transferring existing City functions to a non-City entity for improved efficiency and/or competitive cost concerns. An example of privatization would be a contract for a landscaping company to provide mowing services in a park. The City is always open to suggestions for improving services and cost savings through contractual arrangements. If you have an idea for privatization of current City functions, please call or outline your ideas in a letter for the City’s consideration. In order for partnerships to be successful, research has shown that the following elements should be in place prior to partnership procurement: There must be support for the concept and process of partnering from the very highest organizational level – i.e.: the Board or Trustees, a council, and/or department head. The most successful agencies have high-ranking officials that believe that they owe it to their citizens to explore partnering opportunities whenever presented, those communities both solicit partners and consider partnering requests brought to them. It is very important to have a Partnership Policy in place before partner procurement begins. This allows the agency to be proactive rather than reactive when presented with a partnership opportunity. It also sets a “level playing field” for all potential partners, so that they can know and understand in advance the parameters and selection criteria for a proposed partnership. A partnership policy and process should set development priorities and incorporate multiple points for go/no-go decisions. The partnership creation process should be a public process, with both Partners and the Partnering Agency well aware in advance of the upcoming steps. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 5 C. Partnership Definition For purposes of this document and policy, a Proposed Partnership is defined as: "An identified idea or concept involving Sample Parks and Recreation Department and for- profit, non-profit, and/or governmental entities, outlining the application of combined resources to develop facilities, programs, and/or amenities for the City and its citizens." A partnership is a cooperative venture between two or more parties with a common goal, who combine complementary resources to establish a mutual direction or complete a mutually beneficial project. Partnerships can be facility-based or program-specific. The main goal for XX Parks and Recreation Department partnerships is enhancing public offerings to meet the mission and goals of the City. The XX Parks and Recreation Department is interested in promoting partnerships which involve cooperation among many partners, bringing resources together to accomplish goals in a synergistic manner. Proposals that incorporate such collaborative efforts will receive priority status. Partnerships can accomplish tasks with limited resources, respond to compelling issues, encourage cooperative interaction and conflict resolution, involve outside interests, and serve as an education and outreach tool. Partnerships broaden ownership in various projects and increase public support for community recreation goals. Partners often have flexibility to obtain and invest resources/dollars on products or activities where municipal government may be limited. Partnerships can take the form of (1) cash gifts and donor programs, (2) improved access to alternative funding, (3) property investments, (4) charitable trust funds, (5) labor, (6) materials, (7) equipment, (8) sponsorships, (9) technical skills and/or management skills, and other forms of value. The effective use of volunteers also can figure significantly into developing partnerships. Some partnerships involve active decision making, while in others, certain partners take a more passive role. The following schematic shows the types of possible partnerships discussed in this policy: Types of Partnerships Active Partnerships Management Agreements Program Partnerships Facility Leases Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) Marketing Partnerships Semi-Limited Decision Making Partnerships Sponsorships Limited Decision Making Partnerships Grant Programs Donor Programs Volunteer Programs Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 6 D. Possible Types of Active Partnerships The XX Parks and Recreation Department is interested in promoting collaborative partnerships among multiple community organizations. Types of agreements for Proposed “Active” Partnerships may include leases, contracts, sponsorship agreements, marketing agreements, management agreements, joint-use agreements, inter-governmental agreements, or a combination of these. An innovative and mutually beneficial partnership that does not fit into any of the following categories may also be considered. Proposed partnerships will be considered for facility, service, operations, and/or program development including associated needs, such as parking, paving, fencing, drainage systems, signage, outdoor restrooms, lighting, utility infrastructure, etc. The following examples are provided only to illustrate possible types of partnerships. They are not necessarily examples that would be approved and/or implemented. Examples of Public/Private Partnerships • A private business seeing the need for more/different community fitness and wellness activities wants to build a facility on City land, negotiate a management contract, provide the needed programs, and make a profit. • A private group interested in environmental conservation obtains a grant from a foundation to build an educational kiosk, providing all materials and labor, and is in need of a spot to place it. • Several neighboring businesses see the need for a place for their employees to work out during the work day. They group together to fund initial facilities and an operating subsidy and give the facility to the City to operate for additional public users. • A biking club wants to fund the building of a race course through a park. The races would be held one night per week, but otherwise the path would be open for public biking and in-line skating. • A large corporate community relations office wants to provide a skatepark, but doesn't want to run it. They give a check to the City in exchange for publicizing their underwriting of the park's cost. • A private restaurant operator sees the need for a concessions stand in a park and funds the building of one, operates it, and provides a share of revenue back to the City. • A garden club wants land to build unique butterfly gardens. They will tend the gardens and just need a location and irrigation water. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 7 Examples of Public/Non-Profit Partnerships • A group of participants for a particular sport or hobby sees a need for more playing space and forms a non-profit entity to raise funds for a facility for their priority use that is open to the public during other hours. • A non-profit baseball association needs fields for community programs and wants to obtain grants for the building of the fields. They would get priority use of the fields, which would be open for the City to schedule use during other times. • A museum funds and constructs a new building, dedicating some space and time for community meetings and paying a portion of revenues to the City to lease its land. Examples of Public/Public Partnerships • Two governmental entities contribute financially to the development and construction of a recreational facility to serve residents of both entities. One entity, through an IGA, is responsible for the operation of the facility, while the other entity contributes operating subsidy through a formula based on population or some other appropriate factor. • Two governmental public safety agencies see the need for more physical training space for their employees. They jointly build a gym adjacent to City facilities to share for their training during the day. The gyms would be open for the City to schedule for other users at night. • A school district sees the need for a climbing wall for their athletes. The district funds the wall and subsidizes operating costs, and the City manages and maintains the wall to provide public use during non-school hours. • A university needs meeting rooms. They fund a multi-use building on City land that can be used for City community programs at night. E. Sponsorships The XX Parks and Recreation Department is interested in actively procuring sponsorships for facilities and programs as one type of beneficial partnership. Please see the Sample Parks and Recreation Department Sponsorship Policy for more information. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 8 F. Limited-Decision Making Partnerships: Donor, Volunteer, and Granting Programs While this policy document focuses on the parameters for more active types of partnerships, the City is interested in, and will be happy to discuss, a proposal for any of these types of partnerships, and may create specific plans for such in the future. G. Benefits of Partnerships with Sample Parks and Recreation Department The City expects that any Proposed Partnership will have benefits for all involved parties. Some general expected benefits are: Benefits for the City and the Community: Merging of resources to create a higher level of service and facility availability for community members. Making alternative funding sources available for public community amenities. Tapping into the dynamic and entrepreneurial traits of private industry. Delivering services and facilities more efficiently by allowing for collaborative business solutions to public organizational challenges. Meeting the needs of specific groups of users through the availability of land for development and community use. Benefits for the Partners: Land and/or facility availability at a subsidized level for specific facility and/or program needs. Sharing of the risk with an established stable governmental entity. Becoming part of a larger network of support for management and promotion of facilities and programs. Availability of professional City recreation and planning experts to maximize the facilities and programs that may result. Availability of City staff facilitation to help streamline the planning and operational efforts. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 9 II. The Partnering Process The steps for creation of a partnership with the XX Parks and Recreation Department are as follows: A. XX Parks and Recreation Department will create a public notification process that will help inform any and all interested partners of the availability of partnerships with the City. This will be done through notification in area newspapers, listing in the brochure, or through any other notification method that is feasible. B. The proposing partner takes the first step to propose partnering with the City. To help in reviewing both the partnerships proposed, and the project to be developed in partnership, the City asks for a Preliminary Proposal according to a specific format as outlined in Part Two - Proposed Partnership Outline Format. C. If initial review of a Preliminary Proposal yields interest and appears to be mutually beneficial based on the City Mission and Goals, and the Selection Criteria, a City staff member or appointed representative will be assigned to work with potential partners. D. The City representative is available to answer questions related to the creation of an initial proposal, and after initial interest has been indicated, will work with the proposing partner to create a checklist of what actions need to take place next. Each project will have distinctive planning, design, review, and support issues. The City representative will facilitate the process of determining how the partnership will address these issues. This representative can also facilitate approvals and input from any involved City departments, providing guidance for the partners as to necessary steps. E. An additional focus at this point will be determining whether this project is appropriate for additional collaborative partnering, and whether this project should prompt the City to seek a Request for Proposal (RFP) from competing/collaborating organizations. Request for Proposal (RFP) Trigger: In order to reduce concerns of unfair private competition, if a proposed project involves partnering with a private "for-profit" entity and a dollar amount greater than $5,000, and the City has not already undergone a public process for solicitation of that particular type of partnership, the City will request Partnership Proposals from other interested private entities for identical and/or complementary facilities, programs, or services. A selection of appropriate partners will be part of the process. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 10 F. For most projects, a Formal Proposal from the partners for their desired development project will need to be presented for the City’s official development review processes and approvals. The project may require approval by the Legal, Planning, Fire and Safety, Finance, and/or other City Departments, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Planning Board, The Board of Trustees, and/or the City Supervisor’s Office, depending on project complexity and applicable City Charter provisions, ordinances or regulations. If these reviews are necessary, provision to reimburse the City for its costs incurred in having a representative facilitate the partnered project’s passage through Development Review should be included in the partnership proposal. G. Depending on project complexity and anticipated benefits, responsibilities for all action points are negotiable, within the framework established by law, to ensure the most efficient and mutually beneficial outcome. Some projects may require that all technical and professional expertise and staff resources come from outside the City’s staff, while some projects may proceed most efficiently if the City contributes staff resources to the partnership. H. The partnership must cover the costs the partnership incurs, regardless of how the partnered project is staffed, and reflect those costs in its project proposal and budget. The proposal for the partnered project should also discuss how staffing and expertise will be provided, and what documents will be produced. If City staff resources are to be used by the partnership, those costs should be allocated to the partnered project and charged to it. I. Specific Partnership Agreements appropriate to the project will be drafted jointly. There is no specifically prescribed format for Partnership Agreements, which may take any of several forms depending on what will accomplish the desired relationships among partners. The agreements may be in the form of: Lease Agreements Management and/or Operating Agreements Maintenance Agreements Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) Or a combination of these and/or other appropriate agreements Proposed partnership agreements might include oversight of the development of the partnership, concept plans and project master plans, environmental assessments, architectural designs, development and design review, project management, and construction documents, inspections, contracting, monitoring, etc. Provision to fund the costs and for reimbursing the City for its costs incurred in creating the partnership, facilitating the project’s passage through the Development Review Processes, and completing the required documents should be considered. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 11 J. If all is approved, the Partnership begins. The City is committed to upholding its responsibilities to Partners from the initiation through the continuation of a partnership. Evaluation will be an integral component of all Partnerships. The agreements should outline who is responsible for evaluation and what types of measures will be used, and should detail what will occur should the evaluations reveal Partners are not meeting their Partnership obligations. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 13 III. The Partnership Evaluation Process A. Mission Statements and Goals All partnerships with Sample Parks and Recreation Department should be in accord with the City’s and the Parks and Recreation Department’s Mission and Goals to indicate how a proposed partnership for that Department would be preliminarily evaluated. SAMPLE MISSION STATEMENT The XX Parks and Recreation Department will provide a variety of parks, recreation facilities, and program experiences equitably throughout the community. Programs will be developed and maintained to the highest quality, ensuring a safe environment with exceptional service while developing a lifetime customer. Services will demonstrate a positive economic investment through partnerships with other service providers, both public and private, ensuring a high quality of life for citizens of XX. (Sample) GOALS – • Promote physical and mental health and fitness • Nourish the development of children and youth • Help to build strong communities and neighborhoods • Promote environmental stewardship • Provide beautiful, safe, and functional parks and facilities that improve the lives of all citizens • Preserve cultural and historic features within the City’s parks and recreation systems • Provide a work environment for the Parks & Recreation Department staff that encourages initiative, professional development, high morale, productivity, teamwork, innovation, and excellence in management B. Other Considerations 1. Costs for the Proposal Approval Process For most proposed partnerships, there will be considerable staff time spent on the review and approval process once a project passes the initial review stage. This time includes discussions with Proposing Partners, exploration of synergistic partnering opportunities, possible RFP processes, facilitation of the approval process, assistance in writing and negotiating agreements, contracting, etc. There may also be costs for construction and planning documents, design work, and related needs and development review processes mandated by City ordinances. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 14 Successful Partnerships will take these costs into account and may plan for City recovery of some or all of these costs within the proposal framework. Some of these costs could be considered as construction expenses, reimbursed through a negotiated agreement once operations begin, or covered through some other creative means. 2. Land Use and/or Site Improvements Some proposed partnerships may include facility and/or land use. Necessary site improvements cannot be automatically assumed. Costs and responsibility for these improvements should be considered in any Proposal. Some of the general and usual needs for public facilities that may not be included as City contributions and may need to be negotiated for a project include: Any facilities or non-existent infrastructure construction Outdoor restrooms Water fountains Roads or street improvements Complementary uses of the site Maintenance to specified standards Staffing Parking Utility improvements (phone, cable, storm drainage, electricity, water, gas, sewer, etc.) Snow removal Custodial services Lighting Trash removal 3. Need The nature of provision of public services determines that certain activities will have a higher need than others. Some activities serve a relatively small number of users and have a high facility cost. Others serve a large number of users and are widely available from the private sector because they are profitable. The determination of need for facilities and programs is an ongoing discussion in public provision of programs and amenities. The project will be evaluated based on how the project fulfills a public need. 4. Funding Only when a Partnership Proposal demonstrates high unmet needs and high benefits for City citizens, will the City consider contributing resources to a project. The City recommends that Proposing Partners consider sources of potential funding. The more successful partnerships will have funding secured in advance. In most cases, Proposing Partners should consider funding and cash flow for initial capital development, staffing, and ongoing operation and maintenance. The details of approved and pending funding sources should be clearly identified in a proposal. For many partners, especially small private user groups, non-profit groups, and governmental agencies, cash resources may be a limiting factor in the proposal. It may be a necessity for partners to utilize alternative funding sources for resources to complete a proposed project. Obtaining alternative funding often demands creativity, ingenuity, and persistence, but many forms of funding are available. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 15 Alternative funding can come from many sources, e.g. Sponsorships, Grants, and Donor Programs. A local librarian and/or internet searches can help with foundation and grant resources. Developing a solid leadership team for a partnering organization will help find funding sources. In-kind contributions can, in some cases, add additional funding. All plans for using alternative funding should be clearly identified. The City has an established Sponsorship Policy, and partnered projects will be expected to adhere to the Policy. This includes the necessity of having an Approved Sponsorship Plan in place prior to procurement of sponsorships for a Partnered Project. C. Selection Criteria In assessing a partnership opportunity to provide facilities and services, the City will consider (as appropriate) the following criteria. The Proposed Partnership Outline Format in Part Two provides a structure to use in creating a proposal. City staff and representatives will make an evaluation by attempting to answer each of the following Guiding Questions. • How does the project align with the City and affected Department’s Mission Statement and Goals? • How does the proposed facility fit into the current City and the affected Department’s Master Plan? • How does the facility/program meet the needs of City residents? • How will the project generate more revenue and/or less cost per participant than the City can provide with its own staff or facilities? • What are the alternatives that currently exist, or have been considered, to serve the users identified in this project? • How much of the existing need is now being met within the City borders and within adjacent cities? • What is the number and demographic profile of participants who will be served? • How can the proposing partner assure the City of the long-term stability of the proposed partnership, both for operations and for maintenance standards? • How will the partnered project meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) requirements? • How will the organization offer programs at reasonable and competitive costs for participants • What are the overall benefits for both the City and the Proposing Partners? Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 16 D. Additional Assistance The XX Parks and Recreation Department is aware that the partnership process does entail a great deal of background work on the part of the Proposing Partner. The following list of resources may be helpful in preparing a proposal: • Courses are available through local colleges and universities to help organizations develop a business plan and/or operational pro-formas. • The Chamber of Commerce offers a variety of courses and assistance for business owners and for those contemplating starting new ventures. • There are consultants who specialize in facilitating these types of partnerships. For one example, contact GreenPlay LLC at 303-439-8369 or info@greenplayllc.com. • Reference Librarians at libraries and internet searches can be very helpful in identifying possible funding sources and partners, including grants, foundations, financing, etc. • Relevant information including the City of XX Comprehensive Plan, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, site maps, and other documents are available at the _______. These documents may be copied or reviewed, but may not be taken off-site. • The XX Parks and Recreation Department Web Site (www.XXXX.com) has additional information. • If additional help or information is needed, please call 000-000-0000. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 17 Part Two Sample Proposed Partnership Outline Format Please provide as much information as possible in the following outline form. I. Description of Proposing Organization: • Name of Organization • Years in Business • Contact Name, Mailing Address, Physical Address, Phone, Fax, Email • Purpose of Organization • Services Provided/Member/User/Customer Profiles • Accomplishments • Legal Status II. Decision Making Authority Who is authorized to negotiate on behalf of the organization? Who or what group (i.e. Council/Commission/Board) is the final decision maker and can authorize the funding commitment? What is the timeframe for decision making? Summary of Proposal (100 words or less) What is being proposed in terms of capital development, and program needs? III. Benefits to the Partnering Organization Why is your organization interested in partnering with the XX Parks and Recreation Department? Please individually list and discuss the benefits (monetary and non-monetary) for your organization. IV. Benefits to the Sample Parks and Recreation Department Please individually list and discuss the benefits (monetary and non-monetary) for the XX Parks and Recreation Department and residents of the City. V. Details (as currently known) The following page lists a series of Guiding Questions to help you address details that can help outline the benefits of a possible partnership. Please try to answer as many as possible with currently known information. Please include what your organization proposes to provide and what is requested of XX Parks and Recreation Department. Please include (as known) initial plans for your concept, operations, projected costs and revenues, staffing, and/or any scheduling or maintenance needs, etc. Sample Partnership Policy – ©2003, 2008, 2012, 2015 GreenPlay LLC Page 18 Guiding Questions Meeting the Needs of our Community: In your experience, how does the project align with park and recreation goals? How does the proposed program or facility meet a need for City residents? Who will be the users? What is the projected number and profile of participants who will be served? What alternatives currently exist to serve the users identified in this project? How much of the existing need is now being met? What is the availability of similar programs elsewhere in the community? Do the programs provide opportunities for entry-level, intermediate, and/or expert skill levels? How does this project incorporate environmentally sustainable practices? The Financial Aspect: Can the project generate more revenue and/or less cost per participant than the City can provide with its own staff or facilities? If not, why should the City partner on this project? Will your organization offer programs at reasonable and competitive costs for all participants? What are the anticipated prices for participants? What resources are expected to come from the Parks & Recreation Department? Will there be a monetary benefit for the City, and if so, how and how much? Logistics: How much space do you need? What type of space? What is critical related to location? What is your proposed timeline? What are your projected hours of operations? What are your initial staffing projections? Are there any mutually-beneficial cooperative marketing benefits? What types of insurance will be needed and who will be responsible for acquiring and paying premiums on the policies? What is your organization's experience in providing this type of facility/program? How will your organization meet ADA and EEOC requirements? Agreements and Evaluation: How, by whom, and at what intervals should the project be evaluated? How can you assure the City of long-term stability of your organization? What types and length of agreements should be used for this project? What types of “exit strategies” should we include? What should be done if the project does not meet the conditions of the original agreements? Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-135 Appendix F – GRASP® Methodology THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 GRASP® Level of Service Analysis A. Introduction GRASP® is a unique toolset that allows service providers to identify gaps and prioritize improvements. For the parks and recreation field, this means that you can accurately target needs and develop effective strategies to address them. Provides more robust evidence for action than traditional master planning techniques Decisions are based on customizable demographics and other factors specific to YOUR community, rather than generalized standards The needs and desires of the public are incorporated into the process and reflected in the outcomes The GRASP® methodology was developed collaboratively by GreenPlay, LLC, and Design Concepts, CLA, Inc. specifically to advance the state of the art in master planning for parks and recreation systems. It has been proven over the past 15 years on more than 100 plans representing many of the nation’s top accredited and Gold Medal agencies. Recognizing the value that GRASP® has brought to parks and recreation planning, other firms have adopted similar methods. Meanwhile, we have continued to evolve our proprietary GRASP® methodology to remain at the forefront of innovation and expertise in the field. We are able to offer a much more detailed and refined picture of the level of service for the parks and recreation system in any community. GRASP® goes beyond the typical lands‐and‐features analysis to incorporate historical values, cultural arts, and other unique aspects of your system while taking into account the quality and condition of each asset. B. Level of Service Analysis Analysis of the existing parks, open space, trails, and recreation systems are often conducted in order to try and determine how the systems are serving the public. A Level of Service (LOS) has typically been defined in parks and recreation master plans as the capacity of the various components and facilities that make up the system to meet the needs of the public. This has traditionally been expressed in terms of the size or quantity of a given facility per unit of population. Brief History of Level of Service Analysis In order to help standardize parks and recreation planning, professionals and academics have long been looking for ways to benchmark and provide “national standards” for how much acreage and how many ballfields, pools, playgrounds, etc., a community should have. For example, in 1906 the fledgling “Playground Association of America” called for playground space equal to 30 square feet per child. In the 1970s and early 1980s, the first detailed published works on these topics began emerging (Gold, 1973, Lancaster, 1983). In time “rule of thumb” capacity ratios emerged with 10 acres of parklands per thousand population becoming the most widely accepted standard application. Other normative guides have also been cited as “traditional standards,” but have been less widely accepted. In 1983, Roger Lancaster compiled a book called, Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines, published by the National Park and Recreation Association (NRPA). In this publication, Mr. Lancaster centered on a recommendation “that a park system, at minimum, be composed of a core system of parklands, with a total of 6.25 to 10.5 acres of developed open space per 1,000 population.” (Lancaster, 1983, p. 56) The guidelines went further to make recommendations regarding an appropriate mix of park types, sizes, service areas, acreages, and standards regarding the number of available recreational facilities per thousand people. While the book was published by NRPA and the table of standards became widely 2 known as “the NRPA standards,” for Level of Service Analysis, it is important to note that these standards were never formally adopted for use by NRPA. Since that time various publications have updated and expanded upon possible “standards”, several of which have also been published by NRPA. Many of these publications did benchmarking and other normative research to try and determine what an “average LOS” should be. Yet organizations such as the NRPA and the prestigious American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration have focused in recent years on accreditation standards for agencies which are less directed towards outputs, outcomes, and performance, and more focused on planning, organizational structure, and management processes. The following table gives some of the more commonly and historically used “capacity standards.” 3 Common Historically‐Referenced LOS Capacity “Standards” Activity/ Facility Recommended Space Requirements Service Radius and Location Notes Number of Units per Population Baseball Official Little League 3.0 to 3.85 acre minimum 1.2 acre minimum ¼ to ½ mile Unlighted part of neighborhood complex; lighted fields part of community complex 1 per 5,000; lighted 1 per 30,000 Basketball Youth High school 2,400 – 3,036 vs. 5,040 – 7,280 s.f. ¼ to ½ mile Usually in school, recreation center, or church facility; safe walking or bide access; outdoor courts in neighborhood and community parks, plus active recreation areas in other park settings 1 per 5,000 Football Minimum 1.5 acres 15 – 30 minute travel time Usually part of sports complex in community park or adjacent to school 1 per 20,000 Soccer 1.7 to 2.1 acres 1 to 2 miles Youth soccer on smaller fields adjacent to larger soccer fields or neighborhood parks 1 per 10,000 Softball 1.5 to 2.0 acres ¼ to ½ mile May also be used for youth baseball 1 per 5,000 (if also used for youth baseball) Swimming Pools Varies on size of pool & amenities; usually ½ to 2‐acre site 15 – 30 minutes travel time Pools for general community use should be planned for teaching, competitive, and recreational purposes with enough depth (3.4m) to accommodate 1m to 3m diving boards; located in community park or school site 1 per 20,000 (pools should accommodate 3% to 5% of total population at a time) Tennis Minimum of 7,200 s.f. single court area (2 acres per complex ¼ to ½ mile Best in groups of 2 to 4 courts; located in neighborhood community park or near school site 1 court per 2,000 Volleyball Minimum 4,000 s.f. ½ to 1 mile Usually in school, recreation center or church facility; safe walking or bide access; outdoor courts in neighborhood and community parks, plus active recreation areas in other park settings 1 court per 5,000 Total land Acreage Various types of parks ‐ mini, neighborhood, community, regional, conservation, etc. 10 acres per 1,000 Sources: David N. Ammons, Municipal Benchmarks ‐ Assessing Local Performance and Establishing Community Standards, 2nd Ed., 2002 Roger A. Lancaster (Ed.), Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines (Alexandria, VA: National Recreation and Park Association, 1983), pp. 56‐57. James D. Mertes and James R. Hall, Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenways Guidelines, (Alexandria, VA: National Recreation and Park Association, 1996), pp. 94‐103. 4 In planning work it is important to realize that the above standards can be valuable when referenced as “norms” for capacity, but not necessarily as the target standards for which a community should strive. Every community is different, and there are various factors and details not addressed by the standards above, such as: What about quality and condition? What if there are multiple ballfields, but they haven’t been maintained in the last ten years? What if the agency is an urban land‐locked community? What if the agency is a small town surrounded by open Federal lands? Does “developed acreage” include golf courses? What about indoor and passive facilities? What are the standards for skateparks? Ice Arenas? Public Art? Etc.? And many other questions…. C. GRASP® Component‐Based Level of Service Analysis In order to address these and other relevant questions, a new methodology for determining Level of Service was developed. Since 2001 GRASP® Component Based Level of Service Analysis has been applied in many communities across the nation to provide a better way of to measure and portray the service provided by parks and recreation systems. A component is an asset such as a playground, picnic shelter, court, field, indoor facility or other elements that allows a system to meet the recreational needs of a community. The GRASP® methodology focuses on these essential pieces and parts to glean and understanding of a system as a whole. Primary research and development on this methodology was funded jointly by GreenPlay, LLC, a management consulting firm for parks, open space, and related agencies, Design Concepts, a landscape architecture and planning firm, and Geowest, a spatial information management firm. While a component based system can be utilized by anyone, the proprietary trademarked name for the process used by these three firms is GRASP® (Geo‐Referenced Amenities Standards Process). For GRASP® analysis, the traditional idea of capacity based on acreage and asset quantity is only part of the LOS equation. Other factors are brought into consideration including quality, condition, location, comfort, convenience, and ambience. In a GRASP® analysis parks, trails, open space, and other recreation amenities and properties are studied as part of an overall infrastructure for a community made up of various components such as playgrounds, ballfields, swimming pools, etc. This methodology is unique in that it values the context and setting of a component in addition to the characteristics of the component itself, based on the assumption that but an enhanced setting in proximity to a component enhances the value of the component. 5 The characteristics of components include: Quality – The service provided by anything, whether it is a playground, soccer field, or swimming pool is determined in part by its quality. A playground with a variety of features, such as climbers, slides, and swings provides a higher degree of service than one with nothing but an old teeter‐totter and some “monkey‐bars.” Condition – The condition of a component within the park system also affects the amount of service it provides. A playground in disrepair with unsafe equipment does not offer the same service as one in good condition. Similarly, a soccer field with a smooth surface of well‐maintained grass certainly offers a higher degree of service than one that is full of weeds, ruts, and other hazards. Functionality – Functionality is a measure of how well something serves its intended purpose, and is a result of its quality and condition. Location – To receive service from something, you need to be able to get to it. Therefore, service is dependent upon proximity and access. All components are geographically located using GPS coordinates and GIS software. Comfort – The service provided by a component is increased by having amenities. For example, outdoor components are often enhanced by attributes such as shade, seating, and a restroom nearby. Comfort enhances the experience of using a component. Convenience – Convenience encourages people to use a component, which increases the amount of service that it offers. Easy access and the availability of trash receptacles, bike rack, or nearby parking are examples of conveniences that enhance the service provided by a component. Ambience – Simple observation will prove that people are drawn to places that “feel” good. This includes a sense of safety and security, as well as pleasant surroundings, attractive views, and a sense of place. For example, a well‐designed park is preferable to poorly‐designed one, and this enhances the degree of service provided by the components within it. Capacity is still part of the LOS analysis and the quantity of each component is recorded as well. By combining and analyzing the overlapping values of each component on a map, it is possible to measure the service provided by a parks and recreation system from a variety of perspectives and for any given location in a study area. Typically this begins with a decision on “relevant components” for the analysis, collection of an accurate inventory of those components, analysis and then the results are presented in a series of maps and tables that make up the analysis of the study area. 6 Data for Analysis and Making Justifiable Decisions All of the data generated from the GRASP® evaluation is compiled into a digital database that is then available and owned by the agency for use in a variety of ways. In addition to determining LOS, the database can help keep track of facilities and programs, can be used to schedule maintenance or replacement of components, and can be used to project long‐term capital and life‐cycle costing needs. All portions of the information are in standard available software and can be produced in a variety of ways for future planning or sharing with the public. It is important to note that GRASP® analysis not only provides accurate LOS and facility inventory information, but also works with and integrates with other tools to help agencies make decisions. It is relatively easy to maintain, updatable, and creates easily understood graphic depictions. Combined with a needs assessment, public and staff involvement, program, and financial assessment, GRASP® analysis allows an agency to make defensible recommendations on priorities for ongoing resource allocation, along with capital and operational funding. D. Inventory Data Collection Process A detailed inventory of relevant components for the project is conducted. The inventory locates and catalogues all of the relevant components for the project, and evaluates each one as to how well it was serving its intended function within the system. The planning team first prepares a preliminary list of existing components using aerial photography and the community’s Geographic Information System (GIS). Components identified in the aerial photo are given GIS points and names according to a list of standard components. Next, field visits are conducted by the consulting and project team staff to confirm the preliminary data and collect additional information. Additionally, indoor facilities are scored and for the purposes of this study, each relevant space is considered a component and is scored based on its intended function. During the field visits and evaluations, any missing relevant components are added to the data set, and each component is evaluated as to how well it meets expectations for its intended function. During the site visits the following information is collected: Component type and location Evaluation of component functionality Evaluation of comfort and convenience features Evaluation of park design and ambience Site photos and general comments After the inventory is completed, it is given to the project team for final review and approval for accuracy. 7 E. Standardized Process for Scoring Components Component Scoring The approved inventory is the basis for the creation of values used in analysis. Each component received a functionality score that is related to the quality, condition, and ability of the space to meet operational and programming needs. For the GRASP® process, the range of scores for each component is as follows: Below Expectations (BE) – The component does not meet the expectations of its intended primary function. Factors leading to this may include size, age, accessibility, or others. Each such component is given a score of 1 in the inventory. Meeting Expectations (ME) – The component meets expectations for its intended function. Such components are given scores of 2. Exceeding Expectations (EE) – The component exceeds expectations, due to size, configuration, or unique qualities. Such components are given scores of 3. If the feature exists but is not useable because it is unsafe, obsolete, or dysfunctional, it may be listed in the feature description, and assigned a score of zero (0). If a feature is used for multiple purposes, such as a softball field that is also used for T‐Ball or youth soccer games, it is scored only once under the description that best fits the use that for which the component is designed. Neighborhood and Community Scoring Components are evaluated from two perspectives: first, the value of the component in serving the immediate neighborhood, and second, its value to the entire community. Neighborhood Score Each component is evaluated from the perspective of a resident that lives nearby. High scoring components are easily accessible to pedestrians in the neighborhood, are attractive for short and frequent visits, and are unobtrusive to the surrounding neighborhood. Components that do not have a high neighborhood score may not be located within walking distance of residents, may have “nuisance features” such as sports lighting, or may draw large crowds for which parking is not provided. Community Score Additionally each component is evaluated from the perspective of residents in the community as a whole. High scoring components in this category may be unique components within the parks and recreation system, have a broad draw from throughout the community, have the capacity and associated facilities for community‐wide events, or are located in areas that are accessible only by car. Indoor Components Indoor components are generally thought to be accessible to the entire community, partially because it is often not financially feasible to provide indoor facilities at a walking distance from every distance from each residence. Additionally, indoor facilities often provide programs and facilities that are geared to the community as a whole, or in larger communities, are intended 8 for a region of the community. For these reasons, unless a detailed indoor analysis is completed, indoor facilities are given only one score. Modifiers (Comfort and Convenience Features) Scoring Outdoor Modifiers Besides standard components, this inventory also evaluates features that provide comfort and convenience to the users. These are things that a user might not go to the parks specifically to use, but that may enhance the user’s experience by making it a nicer place to be and include: drinking fountains, seating, BBQ grills, dog stations, security lighting, bike parking, restrooms, shade, connections to trails, park access, parking, picnic tables, and seasonal and ornamental plantings. These features are scored as listed above with the 1‐3 system. In this case it is not important to get a count of the number or size of these components; instead the score should reflect the ability of the item to serve the park. Indoor Modifiers For indoor facilities, the comfort and convenience features change slightly to reflect the characteristics of the building. Building modifier categories include: site access, setting aesthetics, building entry function, building entry aesthetics, overall building condition, entry desk, office space, overall storage, and restrooms and/or locker rooms. Activity and Sports Lighting This modifier accounts for lighting that allows for component use in the evening/night hours and is applied to the quantity of the component as it affectively expands the capacity of the component. This modifier does not apply to security lighting. Shade Like Activity and Sports lighting, shade can be added to outdoor components to extend use beyond normal hours or seasons. Design & Ambience Scoring Using the same rating system that is used for components and modifiers, the quality of Design and Ambience is scored. Good design not only makes a place look nice, it makes it feel safe and pleasant, and encourages people to visit more often and stay longer Trails and Greenways Scoring Trails and/or greenways can be scored as independent parcels or as individual components within another parcel. The former type of trail receives its own set of scores for modifiers and design and ambiance. The trail in the latter situation takes on the modifiers and design and ambiance of the larger park in which it resides. Multi‐use trails are assumed to consist of three components including one active component, one passive component, and the parcel itself. Because traveling the length of any given trail is time consuming, trail information is often collected with the aid of staff. For the purposes of most studies, a list of trails is obtained to provide a reasonable dataset that offers some park and recreational value to the public. While no specific listing of components at each greenway or trail is generated, it is assumed that each greenway provides a value equivalent to three (3) components. Think of these as one active component (walking, running, biking, etc.), one passive 9 component (quiet contemplation along the trail), and one experiential component (observing nature, perhaps art and interpretive signage). These three components and the parcel are assumed to be meeting the expectations (scores 2) of the community in the same way that park components meet expectations. The other parts to the GRASP® score relate to the comfort and design of the location, and are called modifiers. The aesthetic and recreational standards for greenways are typically similar to those for parks, so modifiers at greenways are generally assigned a value of meeting expectations (score 2). Multi‐use trails that typically are adjacent to major roads are assumed to have less aesthetic and recreational standards and are therefore assigned a value of below expectations (score 1). The final component in the GRASP® score is the ownership modifier. This is a percentage that is applied to the score that relates to the general public’s ability to access the facility. This translates into the following formula for calculating the GRASP® score: Trails or Greenway Scoring (Component number + Parcel) x Component score x (Comfort x Design) x ownership = GRASP® score or (3 +1) x 2 x 2.2 x 1 = 17.6 Multi‐Use Trail Scoring (Component number + Parcel) x Component score x (Comfort x Design) x ownership = GRASP® score or (3 +1) x 2 x 1.1 x 1 = 8.8 In the GRASP® Perspectives t, that value is assigned to the location where each trail is found and buffered accordingly. This value also is included in computations for the GRASP® Indices that are calculated along with each Perspective. Ownership Modifier This modifier is generally weighted with a percentage that is applied to the GRASP® score after other modifiers have been applied. It accounts for access and control of components that are provided by alternative providers. For example, in most cases components that are owned and managed by schools are given a 50% weighted ownership modifier, which halves the GRASP® score to account for the limited access that the neighborhood has to school facilities (it’s only open to the public outside of school hours). F. Calculating GRASP® Functional Scores Once the components are inventoried and scored, calculations can be made for any combination of components to derive average scores, scores per combinations of various components, scores per sub‐ areas, etc., depending on the key issues being studied and objectives for the project. These are very helpful for analyzing area comparisons and setting of target scores for component service and agency target standards. For example, a total composite GRASP® score for each individual component is determined by using the following formula: (total component score) x (adjusted modifier score) x (design and ambiance score) x (ownership modifier) = Composite GRASP® Score 10 These individual scores can be additively combined in various ways to examine service from various subsets of the agency’s system. G. GRASP® Perspectives and Target Threshold Scores GRASP® scores are often used to create analysis maps to show how the study area is being served for parks and recreation benefits. These maps are called Perspectives, because each one provides a certain perspective on the way service is being provided. Types of Perspectives include heat maps, threshold maps, and composition maps, as well as others. On heat maps, the numerical value of LOS available to a person at any given location is represented by an orange tone. Where the tone is darker, the available LOS is higher. Locations on the map with no orange tone (i.e a grey tone) have no service. Heat maps can be produced from any set of components in the inventory. For example, if the intent is to measure the relative LOS available for seniors, then a heat map can be generated using only those components in the inventory that relate to seniors. Heat maps can be further analyzed to determine where the LOS on them falls above or below a certain threshold. The threshold may vary, and can be set to represent an assumed “target” value for LOS, or can be the median, average, or other value for the Perspective. On the threshold maps, colors are used to show whether any given location is above or below the threshold value. The types of Perspectives used to analyze and depict the community’s LOS will depend upon the key issues being studied. Typical and Standard GRASP® Perspectives Below are some types of Perspectives typically used to analyze service in an area. Neighborhood Composite This Perspective depicts service from a neighborhood point of view. Multiple buffers (or “catchment areas”) are used to reflect multiple ways of travelling to reach components. The threshold for this Perspective is typically the value that results from being within 1/2 mile of 4 recreation components and one recreational trail. Walkability (same as Neighborhood Composite but with only 1/2 mile buffers) The threshold scores for this Perspective are normally the same as for the Neighborhood Composite. Component‐Specific Analysis The threshold here is equivalent to being within 1/2 mile of the selected component, and assumes that the component, modifiers, and design and ambiance are meeting expectations. Note: Aside from meeting a single goal, the mix of components also needs to be considered. For example, a home that is within 1/2 mile away from four tennis courts and no other amenities would meet the basic numeric standard, but not the intent of the standard. Component Specific Analyses can examine one single type of component or an array of types to analyze the mix of options available to residents. 11 H. GRASP® Project Technical Standards for GIS Data The GRASP® Team utilizes the most up to date computer hardware and software to produce and enhance project‐based GIS data. The following technical details are standard with all GRASP® Team projects. All GRASP® Team GIS workstations employ Microsoft® Windows® operating systems. All project files conform to PC‐based architecture and extension naming standards. The GRASP® Team employs ESRI® ArcGIS™ 10.2 for all GIS applications. Final project GIS data is submitted to the client in Microsoft® Access™‐based Geodatabase (*.mdb) Feature Class format and/or Shapefile (*.shp/*.dbf/*.shx) format. ArcMap™ Layer files (*.lyr) are submitted to ease client replication of all project map legend formats. The GRASP® Team will not resubmit original client source data that has not undergone enhancement. All final GIS datasets (deliverables) area submitted to the client using the geographic coordinate system(s) from the original client source data. The GRASP® team will assign a coordinate system that is most appropriate for the client location if the client does not require a predetermined standard coordinate system. Most GRASP® project data is submitted in State Plane Coordinates (Feet) with a NAD83/NAD83 HARN datum. All GRASP® Perspectives and Resource Maps (deliverables) are submitted to the client in standard PDF and JPEG formats. The project PDFs are high resolution, print‐ready files for scalable print operations. Most project map‐based PDFs are 300dpi, 24” x 36” images. The project JPEGs are lower resolution digital presentation‐ready files for insertion into Microsoft® Office® productivity suite applications – MS Word®, MS Power Point®, etc. Most project map‐ based JPEGs are 300dpi 4”x6” images. Project Deliverables and Future Use All information and deliverables are transmitted “as‐is” to fulfill specific tasks identified in a scope of services for a contract. While these may be useful for other purposes, no warranties or other assurances are made that the deliverables are ready for such use. The database can be modified to add, change, or delete information as needed by personnel trained in use of these standard software applications. For example, if new parks or facilities are constructed, the components of these may be added to the database to keep it current. The database may also be queried in a variety of ways to produce tables, charts, or reports for use in operations, management, and planning or other agency tasks. Such modification, updating, reformatting, or other preparation for other purposes is the sole responsibility of the client. Similarly, the database information can be used to prepare a variety of maps and analysis perspectives using GIS software. Such use by the client is beyond the scope of a single contract, and no warranties or assurances are made that the deliverables are ready or intended for such future use. If desired, the GRASP® Team can make such modifications, and/or prepare additional or updated maps or Perspectives upon request for a negotiated fee. The GRASP® name for the methodology for analysis is proprietary, but the component based process is generic and the software used is common and typical for most agencies. The data and information collected is owned and can be updated and managed by the agency for ongoing usage Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-149 Appendix G – Level of Service Analysis Maps Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-175 Appendix H – Strategic Goals for Urban Forestry THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Strategic goals as identified in Section III, pp. 4‐5 of the Urban Forestry chapter are included below, with additional detail, recommended action items, and estimated timeframe to complete. Timeframe to complete is designated as: Short‐term (up to 3 years) Mid‐term (4‐6 years) Long‐term (7‐10 years) Goal 1: Define a Vision/Direction for Meridian Urban Forestry Objective 1.1: Anticipate a change in leadership and facilitate a smooth leadership transition Actions Timeframe to Complete 1.1.a Define skill set of future City Arborist. Short‐Term 1.1.b Document existing data; current procedures and practices. Short‐Term Objective 1.2: Continue to provide a high level of service Actions Timeframe to Complete 1.2.a Retain a Certified Arborist on staff. Ongoing 1.2.b Continue to respond to forestry‐related calls from the community. Ongoing 1.2.c Risk management to remain a top priority. Ongoing – Mid‐Term 1.2.d Review and comment on development applications relative to tree mitigation. Ongoing 1.2.e Provide regular updates to Parks and Recreation Commission to share progress and successes (quarterly). Ongoing 1.2.f Provide updates to Meridian Development Corporation on state of urban forest in downtown core (biannually). Ongoing Goal 2: Strengthen Approach to Management of the Urban Forest Objective 2.1 Use GIS data on existing urban forest as a primary management tool Actions Timeframe to Complete 2.1.a Complete GIS tree inventory. Short‐Term 2.1.b Provide additional staff training in Forestry‐specific GIS program / Treeworks™ software to maximize effectiveness of this tool. Mid‐Term Goal 3: Evaluate Impacts of Projected Park System Expansion on Urban Forestry Goal 4: Guarantee the Present and Future Health of the Urban Forest Objective 4.1 Ensure diversity Actions Timeframe to Complete 4.1.a Maintain diversity of tree species in urban forest. Ongoing 4.1.b Maintain diversity of tree age in urban forest. Ongoing 4.1.c Use GIS database as tool to manage for diversity. Ongoing Objective 4.2: Implement standards for tree planting Actions Timeframe to Complete 4.2.a Adjust standards to achieve larger tree planting areas to ensure strong root growth, canopy development, and long life. Ongoing 4.2.b Ensure proper planting techniques per ANSI standards. Ongoing 4.2.c Institute guidelines for proper tree selection so that tree habit & culture are suited to planting location. Ongoing 4.2.d Create and maintain an approved list of tree contractors. Short‐Term Objective 3.1: Conduct annual assessment during the budget development process to determine staffing needs. Actions Timeframe to Complete 3.1.a Determine thresholds/triggers for hiring of staff that will allow Urban Forestry to maintain current level of service. Short‐Term 3.1.b Relate these thresholds/triggers to forest size(# of trees). Short‐Term Objective 3.2: Conduct annual assessment during the budget development process to determine maintenance equipment needs Actions Timeframe to Complete 3.2.a Assess need for replacement equipment. Short‐Term 3.2.b Assess need for any new equipment due to increase in volume or scope of in‐house maintenance work. Short‐Term Objective 4.3: Anticipate pests and other potential threats to forest health so as to minimize future impacts Actions Timeframe to Complete 4.3.a Stay current with Urban Foresty trends, including the effects of climate change on the urban forest, by attending conferences and networking with other arborists. Ongoing 4.3.b Provide close tracking and management of pests through GIS and other tools. Mid‐Term 4.3.c Institute chemical control programs as necessary. Mid‐Term Goal 5: Maintain and Promote the Kleiner Arboretum as a Community Asset Objective 5.1: Develop strategic management plan Actions Timeframe to Complete 5.1.a Continue working with CWI horticulture student, with supplemental input from local experts, to complete this plan. Short‐Term 5.1.b Generate budget projections to fund future improvements and ongoing specialized maintenance. Short‐Term 5.1.c Form and solicit a community group to operate the Arboretum, similar to that of the community garden. Mid‐Term Objective 5.2: Celebrate and raise awareness of the arboretum as a community and regional resource Actions Timeframe to Complete 5.2.a Increase marketing and outreach efforts. Short‐Term 5.2.b Enhance signage and interpretation for more interactive visitor experience on multiple levels. Mid‐ Long Term 5.2.c Partner with area colleges, universities, and K‐12 schools to provide education and receive support. Ongoing Objective 5.3: Provide higher‐level, specialized maintenance Actions Timeframe to Complete 5.3.a Provide staff training, specific to arboretum needs. Mid‐Term 5.3.b Train volunteers as a maintenance resource. Mid‐Term Goal 6: Preserve Strong Relationship with the Community/ Seek Additional Opportunities for Education and Outreach Goal 7: Revise City Policy as Necessary to Strengthen Urban Forestry Objective 6.1: Involve City Arborist in public education and other forestry‐related events Actions Timeframe to Complete 6.1.a Continue to respond to forestry‐related calls from the community. Ongoing 6.1.b Offer tree pruning classes, and others on related subject matter. Mid‐Term 6.1.c Partner with ACHD to work with Homeowners Associations to meet standards for tree limb height over sidewalks. Mid‐Term 6.1.d Remain a Tree City, USA. Ongoing Objective 7.1: Periodically review and update forestry ordinance Actions Timeframe to Complete 7.1.a Update existing forestry ordinance to reflect changes to industry or national standards, including Terms, Definitions, Best Practices, or other changes as required to maintain current standards of practice. Ongoing‐ Mid‐Term Objective 7.2: Be a sustainability leader Actions Timeframe to Complete 7.2.a Consider revisions to City Ordinance to address relationship of urban street tree plantings to stormwater management and encourage use of Green Stormwater Infrastructure. Short‐Term 7.2.b Consider revisions to City Ordinance to reference existing plans or study data relative to street trees, stormwater, and/or other infrastructure. Short‐Term Goal 8: Continue to Offer and Develop Special Programs Related to Urban Forestry Objective 8.1: Continue City Christmas Tree program Actions Timeframe to Complete 8.1.a Ensure adequate stock for Christmas Tree Program Ongoing 8.2.a Provide temporary, accessible growing space for donated trees Ongoing Objective 8.2 Support and develop new programs to enhance Meridian’s Urban Forest Actions Timeframe to Complete 8.2.a Continue current programs with Idaho Power, ACHD, MDC, and West Ada School District. Ongoing 8.2.b When developing new programs, seek community support first, then follow through with City budgeting process to determine staffing impacts and necessary funding. Mid‐ to Long‐Term Parks and Recreation Master Plan A-183 Appendix I – Future Park Concept Plans SOUTH MERIDIAN REGIONAL PARK | 77 ACRES CONCEPT STATEMENT: This park will be devoted to active recreation, similar to a Settlers Park, with theming and design elements that will reinforce a unique identity for a south Meridian regional park. A destination softball complex, illuminated for nighttime play and with the capacity to host area tournaments, will be part of this identity. Theming elements may include: planting design to evoke the native sageland area to the north (for non-irrigated turf areas), and also integrated art works to dovetail with local history and culture. PROGRAM ELEMENTS: Diamond ball fields – 4 or 5. Sufficient to host tournament play. Fishing Pond/ Surface Irrigation Water Storage – Locate on north side. Size - approx. 1-2 acres. Restroom Buildings – 3 50-60 acres of turf grass -- estimated Parking 700-750 spaces – consider layout to minimize walking distance to amenities so as to preclude users from parking on area roadways. (Estimated parking requirements were increased during conceptual design process). Integrate drop-off zones with parking lots Primary vehicular access from north off Lake Hazel Road Potential for future roadway along east and south property lines. This would be ideal. Would likely also include streetside parallel parking. Rectangular ball-fields -- flexible, adaptable -- for soccer, lacrosse, other. Significant destination playground Minor splash pad – complementary to playground. Shall have a one-pass water system – no re- circ., waste to pond (needed adjacency). Shall be smaller than splash pad planned as part of nearby YMCA. Pathways – Provide hierarchy of, to include a loop within the park, plus other options for circulation and exercise. Consider including distance information for loops. Large Picnic Shelter – 1 shelter, 200-400 person capacity. Partitionable, if possible. Playground adjacency important. Small picnic shelters – 3 shelters, 20’x20’ approx. Maintenance yard -- Fenced. With garage structure and material storage bins. ½-acre yard min. Dog area – off-leash, fenced. 1-2 acres; consider a completely nonliving surface with plenty of shade. Shade structures – located strategically, to maximize shade. Provide strong relationships to playgrounds, spectator areas, etc. POSSIBLE PROGRAM ELEMENTS: Disc golf – this site could be an option for year-round disc golf course. Tennis Courts – If included, should be dual-use, and striped for pickle ball as well. Possibility of public works well site – would include small well/pump house GENERAL NOTES/ OTHER CONSIDERATIONS It is anticipated this property will be developed ahead of or in tandem with adjacent housing, to avoid complications of coming in later with a lighted softball complex. A septic system will be installed initially, with eventual tie-in to city sewer when development reaches the area. Irrigation well located at northeast part of site, near existing residence. Gas line – identified as the Pipeline Trail corridor – traverses site. Limitations as to what amenities may be located over this utility easement. No major excavation, no footings or foundations, hand-digging required. Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District Tom Roy/ IYSA – Potential partnership with Idaho Youth Soccer Association for ballfield development and use. City water – currently exists at LDS Church to the east. Will be routed from that general area. Irrigation Water info: EXIST. SURFACE WATER = 540 GPM – not continuous GROUNDWATER WELL = 750 GPM TOTAL 1300 GPM – approximate So u t h M e r i d i a n S i t e DĞ ƌ ŝ Ě ŝ Ă Ŷ W Ă ƌ Ŭ Ɛ Θ Z Ğ Đ ƌ Ğ Ă Ɵ Ž Ŷ DĞ ƌ ŝ Ě ŝ Ă Ŷ ͕ / Ě Ă Ś Ž ϴ ϯ ϲ ϰ Ϯ Si t e I n v e n t o r y & A n a l y s i s GE N E R A L N O T E S : IR R I G A T I O N W A T E R I N F O R M A T I O N : dž ŝ Ɛ Ɵ Ŷ Ő ^ Ƶ ƌ Ĩ Ă Đ Ğ t Ă ƚ Ğ ƌ с ϱ ϰ Ϭ ' W D Ͳ Ŷ Ž ƚ Đ Ž Ŷ Ɵ Ŷ Ƶ Ž Ƶ Ɛ 'ƌ Ž Ƶ Ŷ Ě ǁ Ă ƚ Ğ ƌ t Ğ ů ů с ϳ ϱ Ϭ ' W D dŽ ƚ Ă ů ϭ ϯ Ϭ Ϭ ' W D Ͳ Ă Ɖ Ɖ ƌ Ž dž ŝ ŵ Ă ƚ Ğ FU T U R E SE W E R LO W PO I N T HI G H PO I N T FU T U R E TH R O U G H RO A D CI T Y WA T E R IN P U T IR R I G A T I O N WE L L EX I S T I N G RE S I D E N C E TO R E M A I N PR I M A R Y SI T E AC C E S S RU N O F F FUTURE THROUGH ROAD G A S P I P E L I N E E A S E M E N T Su m m a r y o f Pu b l i c C o m m e n t s 77 - A C R E S O U T H M E R I D I A N P R O P E R T Y P U B L I C C O M M E N T S Pa g e 1 o f 5 7 - 9 - 1 5 RE C E I V E D FR O M CO M M E N T S M. C a p e l l v i a e m a i l da t e d 7 / 1 / 1 5 I w a n t e d t o s a y o n e t h i n g t h a t w o u l d b e ni c e i s i f f u t u r e p a r k s a l l i n c l u d e d t e n n i s co u r t s . T h e T r e a s u r e V a l l e y h a s a h i g h am o u n t o f p e o p l e t h a t p l a y t e n n i s p e r c a p i t a , a n d i f y o u n o t i c e , m o s t B o i s e p a r k s h a v e te n n i s c o u r t s . T h a t i s m y 2 c e n t s . I f yo u h a v e q u e s t i o n s o r w a n t m e to e x p a n d i n t h a t l e t m e k n o w . J. A l d e r e t e v i a e m a i l da t e d 6 / 3 0 / 1 5 I c a n ’ t m a k e i t t o t h e m e e t i n g , b u t I s u r e h o p e t h a t t e n n i s c o u r t s a r e p a r t o f t h e p l a n s, a s t h e r e a r e n ’ t any on this side of to w n ! An o n y m o u s e m a i l d a t e d 6/ 3 0 / 1 5 Pr o v i d e d t h e n e w p a r k i n c l u d e s s o f t b a l l f i e l d s ( a s s h o w n o n t h e b r o c h u r e ) m y f i r m w i l l p r o v i d e g e o t e c h n i c a l c o n s u l t i n g se r v i c e s a t c o s t . I w i l l n e e d t o i n v o i c e f o r i t e m s I p a y f o r , s u ch a s d r i l l r i g o r b a c k h o e t o ex c a v a t e t e s t p i t s , h i g h e n d s o i l s la b w o r k , e t c . , b u t m y t i m e a n d m y s t a f f ' s t i m e w i l l b e d o n a t e d a s n e e d e d . A s a l o n g t i m e p a r t i c i p a n t i n y o u r s p r i n g a n d fa l l s o f t b a l l s e a s o n s , i t i s n i ce t o b e a b l e t o g i v e b a c k . M. C o x v i a p h o n e me s s a g e d a t e d 7 / 7 / 1 5 I h o p e t o s u p p o r t p i c k l e b a l l i n t h e p l a n n i n g o f t h e p a r k . T. & K . S a u e r v i a e m a i l da t e d 7 / 8 / 1 5 Fo r t h e n e w p a r k , w e w o u l d l i k e t o s u g g e s t th a t P i c k l e b a l l C o u r t s a r e ad d e d . I t i s a g r o w i n g s p ort, and permanent courts wo u l d b e a n a d d e d a t t r a c t i o n f o r M e r i d i an r e s i d e n t s . P l e a s e t a k e t h i s i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n w h e n p l a n n i n g t h e p a r k . D. N i c h o l l s v i a e m a i l da t e d 7 / 1 0 / 1 5 I’ m a t t a c h i n g a s k e t c h m a p o f t h e ar e a o f m y c o n c e r n ( s e e b e l o w ) . Th e r e a r e t w o m a i n p o i n t s o f a c c e s s t o t h e n e w S o u t h M e r i d i a n P a rk s i t e : t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n s o f L a k e H a z e l R o a d w i t h b o t h Ea g l e R o a d a n d M e r i d i a n R o a d ( H i g h w a y 6 9 ) . B o t h a r e u n d e ve l o p e d i n t e r s e c t i o n s t h a t s h o u ld be kept in mind in the pl a n n i n g s t a g e . My b i g g e s t c o n c e r n i s t h e L a k e H a z e l / E a g l e i n t e r s e c t i o n . I t ’ s h a l f w a y u p a b l u f f a nd n o w i s j u s t a f o u r - w a y s t o p . T h a t ar e a i s r a p i d l y b e c o m i n g a d e s t i n a t i o n f o r g r o u p s p o r t s , w h a t wi t h t h e n e w Y M C A c o m p l e x n e a r E a g l e a n d A m i t y a n d t h e NO V A y o u t h s o c c e r c o m p l e x n e a r t h e L a ke H a z e l / E a g l e i n t e r s e c t i o n . Th e N E q u a d r a n t f r o m L a k e H a z e l / E a g l e w a s o w n e d b y t h e T u r f Co . a n d t h e H i l l f a m i l y . T h e o w n e r s o f t h e T u r f C o . a r e yo u t h s o c c e r s u p p o r t e r s a n d s o l d a p a r c e l fo r t h e N O V A c o m p l e x . T h a t a r e a i s n o w pr i m e f o r d e v e l o p m e n t , a n d t h e T u r f Co . a n d t h e H i l l f a m i l y h a v e s o l d t h e i r l a nd t o f o r m t h e n e w C e n t u r y F a r m s u b d i v i s i o n . Th e a c t u a l s o d g r o w i n g f i e l d s f o r t h e T u r f C o . n o w l i e o n t h e S E q u a d r a n t o f V a n t a g e P o i n t L a n e a n d E a g l e R o a d , a n d al s o t o t h e s o u t h o f H u b b a r d r o a d i n la n d a d j a c e n t t o “ L a k e H u b b a r d ” . D u r i n g s o c c e r t o u r n a m e n t s , g a m e s a r e p l a y e d n o t ju s t a t t h e N O V A c o m p l e x b u t a l s o a t t w o ov e r f l o w s i t e s : t h e T u r f C o . g r o w i n g f i el d s a s s h o w n o n m y m a p . T h i s c a u s e s 77 - A C R E S O U T H M E R I D I A N P R O P E R T Y P U B L I C C O M M E N T S Pa g e 2 o f 5 7 - 9 - 1 5 ex t r e m e t r a f f i c c o n g e s t i o n a t t h e L a k e H a z e l / E a g l e i n t e r s ec t i o n . I ’ m p o i n t i n g t h i s o u t s i n c e y o u w o u l d n o t k n o w a b o u t th i s u n l e s s y o u l i v e d i n t h e i m m e d i a t e a r e a . Co n s i d e r t h e t r a f f i c i m p a c t o f j u s t t h e f i ve s o f t b a l l f i e l d s i n t h e ne w S o u t h M e r i d i a n P a r k . W i t h 9 p l a y e r s p e r t e a m a n d 2 te a m s p e r g a m e t i m e s 5 f i e l d s . . . . t h a t ’ s a m i n i m u m o f 9 0 p e o p l e s h o w i n g u p t o p l a y. W i t h y o u t h y o u m a y h a v e 9 0 c a r s i f a pa r e n t b r i n g s t h e m i n a c a r . A d d i n t r a f f i c f r o m t h e ot h e r p l a y i n g f i e l d s a n d y o u c a n s e e t h e r e w i l l b e a p r o b l e m . I’ m p o i n t i n g t h i s o u t a s a n a r e a r e s i d e n t w h o s e e s t h i s s i t u a t i o n un f o l d . I w o u l d s u g g e s t t h a t y o u a t M e r i d i a n P & R g e t yo u r n e e d s k n o w n t o A C H D a s e a r l y a s p o ss i b l e . F o r e x a m p l e , y o u n e e d a d e d i c a te d r i g h t t u r n l a n e c o m i n g o f f E a g l e Ro a d g o i n g w e s t b o u n d o n t o L a k e H a z e l R o a d . 77 - A C R E S O U T H M E R I D I A N P R O P E R T Y P U B L I C C O M M E N T S Pa g e 3 o f 5 7 - 9 - 1 5 M. B e r t e l v i a C o m m e n t Ca r d d a t e d 7 / 9 / 1 5 Li k e h a v i n g t h e d o g p a r k . L o v e h a v i n g a n i c e p a r k i n S . M e ri d i a n . R e a l l y l i k e a n o u t d o o r g r e e n s p a c e t o w a l k . Pa t h w a y s a n d t r a i l s a n d g e t c o n n e c t e d . Li k e l o t s o f t r e e s . R e a l l y l i k e t h e w a y M e r i d i a n i s d e v e l o p i n g w i t h a l l t h e be a u t i f u l l a n d s c a p i n g . 77 - A C R E S O U T H M E R I D I A N P R O P E R T Y P U B L I C C O M M E N T S Pa g e 4 o f 5 7 - 9 - 1 5 T. P i n k e r t B r a n n e r v i a Co m m e n t C a r d d a t e d 7/ 9 / 1 5 I t h i n k t h i s i s a r e a l l y b e a u t i f u l l y d e s i gn e d p a r k . I ’ d l i k e t o s e e a l a r g e r p l a y a r e a a n d s p l a s h p a d f o r k i d s a n d s o m e co v e r e d s e a t i n g a r o u n d t h e p l a y a r e a , s o p a re n t s c a n w a t c h t h e i r k i d s w i t h o u t o v e r h e a ti n g ( t r e e s w i l l t a k e s e v e r a l y e a r s t o pr o v i d e s h a d e ) . J. M o y e r v i a C o m m e n t Ca r d d a t e d 7 / 9 / 1 5 Ho w d o e s t h e P a r k ’ s D e p a r t m e n t c o n f i g u r e i t s i r r i g a t i o n ? W h a t is r a t i o o f f i n a l i r r i g a t e d l a nd s c a p e t o o r i g i n a l l a n d a r e a ? Po c a t e l l o p l a n n e d a n a m p h i t h e a t e r t o g e n e r a t e s o m e r e v e n u e t o h e l p o f f - s e t s o m e e x p e n s e s . L. M c M u l l a n v i a Co m m e n t C a r d d a t e d 7/ 9 / 1 5 Th e n e e d f o r m o r e b a s e b a l l a n d s o c c e r f i e l d s i s F A R l e s s th a n t h e n e e d f o r a n o u t d o o r c o m m u n i t y s w i m m i n g p o o l . W e ’ d ra t h e r s e e a p o o l ! M e r i d i an i s d e s p e r a t e l y d r y ! J. & P . C r o t t y v i a Co m m e n t C a r d d a t e d 7/ 9 / 1 5 Th r e e r e s t r o o m s s e e m q u i t e i n a d e q u a t e f o r a p a r k t h i s s i z e , e s pe c i a l l y i f t o u r n a m e n t s a r e e xp e c t e d t o b e p l a y e d t h e r e . Pa r k i n g w i l l a l w a y s b e a c h a l le n g e d u r i n g t o u r n a m e n t s a l s o ! C. H o l l i s t e r v i a Co m m e n t C a r d d a t e d 7/ 9 / 1 5 Ra d i o c o n t r o l f l y i n g f i e l d w o u l d b e a n i c e f e a t u r e . T. D o n o h u e ( B o i s e A r e a Pi c k l e b a l l A s s o c i a t i o n ) vi a C o m m e n t C a r d d a t e d 7/ 9 / 1 5 Th i s d e s i g n c o n c e p t i s v e r y i m a g i n a t i v e . W e h o p e t h a t t h e f i n a l d e s i g n i n c l u d e s te n d e d i c a t e d p i c k l e b a l l c o u r t s f o r t h e fa s t e s t g r o w i n g s p o r t i n N . A m e r i c a . Ou r c l u b i n c o r p o r a t e s p e o p l e f r o m 1 5 to 8 5 y e a r s y o u n g , s h a r e d e q u a l l y b y m a l e s an d f e m a l e s . E x c l u d i n g o t h e r P B g r o up s i n t h e a r e a , B A P A h a s g r o w n b y 4 to 5 t i m e s i n t h e l a s t 4 y e a r s . Th e f e n c e d “ d o g p a r k ” i s 4 t i m e s l a r g e r t h a n t h e p i c k l e b a l l c o u r t s ! I s s o f t b a l l t h a t bi g t h a t 1 / 3 o f t h e 7 7 a c r e s i s d e v o t e d t o it ? J. V a r g a s v i a C o m m e n t Ca r d d a t e d 7 / 9 / 1 5 1. Ad d m o r e r e s t r o o m s . 2. No t s u r e t h a t 2 e x t r a f i e l d s f o r L i t t l e L e a g u e o r S r . S o ft b a l l i s e n o u g h t o s e r v i c e t h e g r ow i n g n e e d . M i g h t n e e d 2 - 3 mo r e . 3. Pa r k i n g w i l l a l w a y s b e a p r e m i u m. M a k e s u r e t h e b u l k o f t h e s o f t b a l l / s o c c e r p a r e n t s / u s e r s h a v e t o p a r k i n t h e b i g l o t or a l l t h e o t h e r l o t s w i l l a l w a y s b e f u l l a n d t h e n n o o n e w i l l u s e t h e o t h e r a m e n i t i e s b e c a u s e t h e y c a n ’ t f i n d a p a r k i n g sp o t . T h e n o v e r t i m e t h e p a r k w i l l o n l y b e u s e d f o r s o f t b a l l / s o c c e r . W. & T . L . C a y s v i a Co m m e n t C a r d d a t e d 7/ 9 / 1 5 We w o u l d l i k e t o s e e s o m e p o r t i o n o f t h e pa r k d e s i g n e d t o i n c l u d e c u l t u r a l p r o g r a m s, s u c h a s m u s i c , o u t d o o r s t a g e e v e n t s , et c . M o r e l i k e K l e i n e r P a r k b a n d s h e l l ! B. L a w s ( M V H S G i r l s La c r o s s e ) v i a C o m m e n t Ca r t d a t e d 7 / 9 / 1 5 I a m v e r y p l e a s e d t o s e e a m u c h n e e d e d pa r k p l a n n e d f o r s o u t h o f t h e f r e e w a y . I am c o n c e r n e d w i t h t h e o v e r d u e n e e d f o r la c r o s s e f i e l d s p a c e . I t a p p e a r s t h a t a l l o t h e r s p o r t s h a v e be e n a d d r e s s e d i n c u r r e n t p a r k s . H o w e v e r , a s t h e S t a t e s m a n re p o r t e d , l a c r o s s e i s t h e o n l y y o u t h s p o r t g r ow i n g i n t h e U . S . , a n d I d a h o i s t h e t op t e n s t a t e e x p e r i e n c i n g t h a t g r o w t h . La c r o s s e g r e w b y 6 % f o r y o u t h s p o r t s ; a l l o t h e r y o u t h s p o r t s e xp e r i e n c e d d e c l i n e s b e t w e e n 2 - 5 % . I want to see Meridian 77 - A C R E S O U T H M E R I D I A N P R O P E R T Y P U B L I C C O M M E N T S Pa g e 5 o f 5 7 - 9 - 1 5 pl a n n i n g w i t h t h o s e n u m b e r s i n m i n d . I s u g g e s t t h a t t h e m u l t i - u s e f i e l d s b e d e ve l o p e d i n p h a s e o n e . F o r t h e a m o u n t o f d e v e l o p m e n t n e e d e d , i t w o u l d b e v e r y fi n a n c i a l l y f e a s i b l e . A l s o , w i t h t h e g r o w th o f l a c r o s s e i n y o u t h s p o r t s , i t w o u l d b e g o o d f o r t h e C i t y t o s e e h o w q u i c k l y th o s e f i e l d s a r e n e e d e d o n a y e a r - r o u n d a n d r e g u l a r b a s i s . Be a u t i f u l p a r k d e s i g n . An o n y m o u s v i a Co m m e n t C a r d d a t e d 7/ 9 / 1 5 To o m u c h e m p h a s i s o n s o f t b a l l a s a w h o l e . W o u l d l i k e t o s e e m o r e “ p a s s i v e ” a r e a s. F o r e x a m p l e , t h e s p l a s h p a d — w o u l d lo v e t o s e e i t b e f o r o l d e r k i d s a s w e l l — o r b i g g e r . C a n p i c k l e b a l l b e p l a y e d on t e n n i s c o u r t s ? T h a n k s ! K. B a i r ( W e s t A d a Sc h o o l D i s t r i c t ) v i a Co m m e n t C a r d d a t e d 7/ 9 / 1 5 Sh a d e p r o v i d e d o v e r p l a y s t r u c t u r e s , s u c h a s s a i l s t o r e d u c e h ea t d u r i n g s u m m e r o f m e t a l s t r u ctures, would be appreciated fo r i n c r e a s e d u s e . T. L e a c h ( B o i s e A r e a Pi c k l e b a l l A s s o c i a t i o n ) vi a C o m m e n t C a r d d a t e d 7/ 9 / 1 5 Ne e d m o r e p i c k l e b a l l c o u r t s . Y o u c a n p u t 4 pi c k l e b a l l c o u r t s i n t h e s a m e s p a c e a s 1 te n n i s c o u r t . S o i f w e c o u l d h a v e t h e sa m e s p a c e a s t e n n i s f o o t p r i n t t h a t c o u l d g i v e u s 1 2 c o u r t s . T h r e e c o u r t s a r e n o t e n o u g h . D. D r a k e ( I d a h o S e n i o r So f t b a l l ) v i a C o m m e n t Ca r d d a t e d 7 / 9 / 1 5 Wo u l d l i k e t o s e e a s o f t b a l l f i e l d f o r s e ni o r s a n d d e d i c a t e d t o v e t e r a n s . M o s t p l a y e r s i n t h e I d a h o S e n i o r S o f t b a l l As s o c i a t i o n a r e v e t s . Ho p e t h a t t h e s e n i o r f i e l d w i l l b e b u il t e a r l y , s i n c e w e a r e a ll o v e r 6 0 a n d d o n ’ t k n o w h o w m u c h t i m e w e h a v e l e f t . WEST MERIDIAN REGIONAL PARK | 47 ACRES CONCEPT STATEMENT: The Borup-Bottles property is envisioned as a community park with primarily active recreation facilities of a scope similar to Heroes Park. The recent needs assessment conducted as part of the Comprehensive Parks & Recreation Master Planning effort determined that rodeo facilities, while important to some, are not a priority for the City to provide and will not be included in this park. Theming elements, art, and other design materials for this park could focus on the agrarian/dairy heritage of the area that is representative of the “Old Meridian,” much of which has been lost to new development in recent decades. PROGRAM ELEMENTS: Fishing Pond/ Surface Irrigation Water Storage – Sized at 0.5-1 acres Restroom Buildings – (2) Parking -- 500+ spaces. Consider layout to minimize walking distance to amenities so as to preclude users from parking on area roadways Integrate drop-off zones with parking lots Vehicular access from the south off Cherry Lane per ACHD requirements Consider moving the residential access easement to the east. Potential for future roadway along east property line. Investigate this potential with ACHD. May also include streetside parallel parking. Dog area – off-leash, fenced. Approximately 1-2 acres in size. Consider layout with small dog area in center with large dog areas at either end that may be rotated for turf recovery. Explore options for a completely non-living surface with plenty of shade. Rectangular ball-fields -- flexible, adaptable -- for soccer, lacrosse, other. Maintenance yard. Fenced. With garage structure, asphalt paving storage bins. 1-acre max. size. Significant playground element. Destination. Pathways – Provide hierarchy of. Loop within park, plus other subsidiary options for circulation and exercise. Consider including distance information for loops. Provide bridge/ pedestrian connection to existing pathway north of canal Picnic Shelters – 3 Total – (2) 20’x20’ and (1) 20’x30’ Shade structures – strategic locations for, to maximize shade. Strong relationships to playgrounds, spectator areas, etc. POSSIBLE PROGRAM ELEMENTS: Disc golf – this site could be an option for year-round disc golf course. Community Gardens – that might be integrated with maintenance yard, as in Kleiner Park. GENERAL NOTES/ OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: As part of the purchase agreement, access to the existing residence to remain must be provided per this master plan. Could be a shared parking lot or access road. This site is not in the 10-yr CIP plan Could be developed with a septic system, initially, with eventual tie-in to city sewer when development reaches the area Gas line – identified as Pipeline pathway corridor – traverses part of the site. Limitations exist as to what amenities may be located over this utility easement. Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District Water rights for irrigation EXIST. SURFACE WATER = 329 GPM OTHER WATER, ANTICIPATED = 400 GPM TOTAL 730 GPM – approximate We s t M e r i d i a n R e g i o n a l P a r k Me r i d i a n P a r k s & R e c r e a Ɵ on Me r i d i a n , I d a h o 8 3 6 4 2 Si t e I n v e n t o r y & A n a l y s i s IR R I G A T I O N W A T E R I N F O R M A T I O N : Ex i s t . S u r f a c e W a t e r = 3 2 9 G P M Ot h e r W a t e r , A n Ɵ ci p a t e d = 4 0 0 G P M To t a l 7 3 0 G P M – a p p r o x . GE N E R A L N O T E S : TO T A L = 4 7 A C R E S RA I L S W I T H T R A I L S C O R R I D O R TO S O U T H ( N O R T H O F F R A N K L I N ) TE N M I L E C R E E K EX I S T I N G RE S I D E N C E TO R E M A I N PR I M A R Y SI T E AC C E S S AG R I C U L T U R E AG R I C U L T U R E EX I S T I N G R E S I D E N C E TO R E M A I N W. C h e r r y L a n e M c D e r m o t t R o a d F u t u r e C o n n e c t i o n t o H W Y 1 6 - E m m e t t CA N A L A C C E S S R O A D UN D E R G R O U N D G A S L I N E RI G H T O F W A Y PR E S E R V E AC C E S S MERIDIAN LOOP PATHWAY PI P E L I N E PA T H W A Y TE N M I L E C R E E K P A T H W A Y We s t M e r i d i a n R e g i o n a l P ar k Me ri d i a n P a r ks & R ec r ea Ɵ on M er i d i a n , I d a h o 8 3 6 4 2 S um m a r y o f Pu b l i c C o m m e n t s y NOTE: Pro j ect will be phased . 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 Sc a l e (#) Nu m b er comment s in p arentheses indicate how often a m eetin g a pp eared on the p lans p rovided at the p ublic m . If no p arentheses, comment a pp eared once . We s t M e r i d i a n R e g i o n a l P ar k Me ri d i a n P a r ks & R ec r ea Ɵ on M er i d i a n , I d a h o 8 3 6 4 2 NOTE: Project will be phased.NO TE Su m m a r y o f Pu b l i c C o m m e n t s y 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 Sc a l e (#) Nu m be r e nt s s in p ar en n th t eses indicate ho w of ten a comm e g ap pe ared on the plans prov id ed at th e pu bl ic mee ti ng . If no p arentheses, comment a pp eared once . 47-ACRE WEST MERIDIAN PROPERTY PUBLIC COMMENTS Page 1 of 5 7-30-15 RECEIVED FROM COMMENT S D. Farnham via email dated 7/21/15 As a longtime, 4th Generation Idahoan/’Meridianite,’ I am inquiring as to the possibility of adding an ‘Outdoor Archery Range’ at the new park that is proposed for McDermott and Cherry Lane Roads. I believe this would be a positive addition so local residents would not have to travel to Boise for archery practice and also to build or interest our youth into the sport. Actual space-wise would be small proportionally, and upkeep at a minimum. Maybe some volunteer work to get it started. I brought up this proposal/wish to the City a year or two ago and was told that there were not any plans set at that time. I sure hope this could be brought up or earmarked at this juncture and feel the timing is perfect. A. Mehl via email dated 7/21/15 I do like the plan of additional softball fields. How about 4? R. & K. Poulin via email dated 8/11/15 The plan as shown in the presentation is simply just awesome. We live in the Castlebrook sub-division nearby. We would set our morning walk destination for the park each morning for sure if there was a way to get there on foot. My wife and I have no issue with anything we read in the presentation; however, if we were asked to vote on our preferred plan, we would probably vote for Concept #1 for the simple reason that it opens the park up to a wider audience than mostly soccer. However, we do realize that for large public venues, Concept #2 would probably work out better, but then, we already have a park with large venues in mind near The Village. The only wish we have is that the City/County move a little faster on the walking paths. We hope that, in our lifetime, we would have the ability to walk from the Franklin Christian Church to the new park using the path along the Ten-Mile Creek. That, to us, is just as important as the new park because it would encourage people to walk and promote a healthy lifestyle. T. Faubel via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 How about using North McDermott Road as an entrance, once it’s redone? I just talked to the guy who owns the land at the southwest corner of the park/area. I think he might sell some of his land. The new McDermott Road will be ¼ mile west of where it is now. What about uses of the park during the winter months? Any plans for that? G. Huskey via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 Needs more shelters. Please be considerate of the needs of the existing homeowners in the area. D. Beehler (Meridian Lions) via Comment Would like to see accommodations for the Meridian Lions Rodeo or assistance in relocation. 47-ACRE WEST MERIDIAN PROPERTY PUBLIC COMMENTS Page 2 of 5 7-30-15 Card dated 7/30/15 R. Hagadone (Meridian Lions) via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 I am disappointed that there is not a space for the rodeo grounds. We do make money, and this money goes to the people in the community. We donate to the Meridian Food Bank and provide community service to check the food and help organize the shelves. We also provide for eyeglasses and hearing devices for those who apply that have a limited income. J. Bokenkamp via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 Excited to see Community Garden space in both concepts—curious about their design and size and vision. With the growth to the west in Meridian, would be nice to create another nice-sized dog park. Concerns about entrances/exits—I almost think I’d consider coming around to the left of the parking area and north of the dog park to come out on McDermott. B. Freeland via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 Year-round aquatic facility. Handicap access for all facilities. #1 Concept seems to make more sense. Dog park with restrooms available nearby. J. Frasier via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 I live across Cherry Lane from one of your entrance and egress streets. I asked that they not do this, as people will be entering and exiting the park throughout the day and if fields are lighted into the night. I would like to be contacted within 30 days to see if anyone in Planning thinks this is a real concern. M. Massett (MYAC) via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 Prefer Concept 2 – will attract various groups. • When games are finished at sport complexes, consider parking traffic in and out (other exits). • Consider residences trying to get home or out with traffic. • Open grass: for picnic/free space/sport jams (Frisbee). • Put big trees along trail/small trees nearing parking (roof damage). • Maintain park structure cleanliness. • Utilize waterways for attraction and function (hot weather cools air). • Hills. S. Day via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 Thanks for the invitation to attend this meeting. I like the mix of active sports with pond/trails. I recommend a third exit for vehicles is added. I recommend including a hill area near sand volleyball courts (see Boise State sand courts). I’d prefer arranging parking so there are spaces in at least 3 sections vs. 1 large and strip. Sand volleyball is becoming “trendy”/popular (and competitive). So I like having those 2 courts in this concept. 47-ACRE WEST MERIDIAN PROPERTY PUBLIC COMMENTS Page 3 of 5 7-30-15 Lacrosse is gaining in popularity; therefore, facilitating lacrosse fields makes some sense. I think a concept that includes an indoor ice rink would be great. Short-track speed skaters could train and race in a rink at this park. I’d think a concept with: 1) ice rink, 2) sand volleyball courts, 3) lacrosse/soccer fields, and 4) fishing pond sounds lovely. J. Lucker via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 60+ wood bat softball “Veterans Memorial Softball Field” Regional softball tournaments Time to fund a field for veterans who have given so much for our country. Anonymous via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 More pickleball courts—You can put 4 pickleball courts in the same footprint as 1 tennis court. So if you had 2 tennis courts and 8 pickleball courts, that would be awesome. Twelve would be even better!!! F. DePold via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 Love it. Personally I think the multiuse option will get more use. Also I think people would love to have exercise stations around the park. My only complaint is it’s too far out. G. Mossett via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 Design Concept #2 would work better, since there is already a plethora of fields currently in Settlers Park. The multi-field option would work better, especially if there were to be a large lacrosse, soccer, football, etc. tournament taking place throughout the valley. J. Moyer via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 If a park is planned at McMillan and McDermott, why another park so close? If McDermott is the county line, are we building for Meridian or Nampa? M. Frasier via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 • Move 2nd entrance. • Purchase property on McDermott for additional 10 acres and McDermott entrance. • Where will irrigation water come from for grass? • Where will “overflow” parking be? On Cherry Lane? Overflow to Settlers is on Ustick. • Speed limit on Cherry Lane? D. Anderson via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 1. Will sports fields be lit at night? 2. What type of fence on the west? Security for pathway to help people jumping the fence. I like all the trees. Thank you for removing the animal shelter. R. & B. Schumacher via Possibility of a Bocce Ball Court? Like the idea of a multi-use field, rather than totally dedicated to softball, but team use 47-ACRE WEST MERIDIAN PROPERTY PUBLIC COMMENTS Page 4 of 5 7-30-15 Comment Card dated 7/30/15 may dictate otherwise. Looks like a wonderful first concept of a park! D. Farnham via Comment Card dated 7/30/15 I absolutely love the idea/concept of the softball complex. I would love even more for the addition of an outdoor field archery range similar to Fort Boise. I have forwarded a few emails on concepts, community enhancement, etc. and will include a ‘very rough’ drawing (see below) (and pictures on file from my phone). Thank you for listening to a LONGTIME (51 years) Idaho/Meridian resident. Appreciate any comments or listening from the City. 47-ACRE WEST MERIDIAN PROPERTY PUBLIC COMMENTS Page 5 of 5 7-30-15 MARGARET ALDAPE PARK | 70 ACRES, APPROX. CONCEPT STATEMENT Margaret Aldape Park is envisioned as a natural, passive‐use area unlike any other park in Meridian’s park system. This is primarily due to its riverfront location and the unique opportunities for passive recreation – walking/hiking, picnicking, fishing, wildlife viewing, and non‐motorized water sports such as kayaking and paddle‐boarding ‐‐ that this landscape affords. Emphasis will be on the development of pedestrian trails to provide access to the site in a variety of seasons and corresponding water levels. There is also opportunity to enhance current wildlife habitat to sustain and promote the diverse species that live in and migrate through the park. Determination of the final park boundary will be an iterative process that takes into account the final revised FEMA floodway boundary; need for park land outside the floodway that can provide parking, restrooms and other constructed support amenities; and priorities of the proposed adjacent residential development. In terms of theming and identity, park design will take its cues from the Boise River, Basque culture and history, and elements of Aldape family history as may relate to paths and architectural elements, materials, place names, integrated art pieces, and other opportunities as they arise. PROGRAM ELEMENTS Note: Final determination of the park program elements will be based on feedback from the donors, Sherrie and John Ewing, and their family. Margaret Pond – exists already on park site Provide a second pond that will provide boat access to the Boise River Restroom Building(s) – 2 desired. Must be outside of floodway and situated to comply with FEMA requirements for floodplain development. There will likely also be a need for above‐ ground portables in the further reaches of the property, proximate to river. Parking ‐‐ 500 spaces min., plus overflow Vehicular access from the south – through existing and proposed neighborhood developments. Secondary future access assumed. Maintenance yard – 1/2‐ acre minimum One large destination play structure, themed to match the park. In addition, a less‐traditional play area with options for unstructured, task‐oriented play that may be integrated with landforms, trees and canopy areas, or other. Limited acreage of irrigated turf grass. Irrigated turf areas shall be designed strategically so as to serve areas of higher use and pedestrian traffic. Pathways – Provide hierarchy of. Assume riverside pathway, pedestrian loops and options within park. General transition from primary paved loop to branches and offshoots of compacted gravel. Pathway structural elements such as boardwalks and bridges will be required to make the site [mostly] accessible during periods of high water Picnic Shelters (4) – 1 large shelter, 3 family size. Capitalize on opportunities for integration of Basque cultural element through theming and use of materials, interpretive signage. Area for Boise River ingress/egress to control and minimize negative impacts on erosion and riparian vegetation Kayak/ Canoe launching sites – at both ponds and river Provide a dock at Margaret Pond. Look into Fish and Game grants to fund these. Interpretive signs – Basque Culture, property history, wildlife – type, habitat, water cycle POSSIBLE PROGRAM ELEMENTS Disc golf – consider potential for integration at this site. Potential Integration of water cycle interpretive exhibits Explore possibility of connecting pond to river for access via kayak, other non‐motorized boats GENERAL NOTES/ OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Understand and design for seasonal high water areas It is expected that there will be times during periods of high water when the site, or a portion of the park, is closed to public use for safety reasons Roadways and parking permitted in floodway. Limitations exist with regards to fill, or any modification that would reduce capacity of floodway area. Potential additional park land will be South of the riverfront portion of the park, comprised of a strip roughly 250’ wide and running the length of the southern floodway boundary. Southern boundary is assumed for the preliminary design concept. Irrigation water rights to be applied for upon acquisition of property. Need to calculate anticipated irrigation water requirements. Research locations of any existing bald eagle nesting sites on or near the park site. Ma r g a r e t A l d a p e P a r k DĞ ƌ ŝ Ě ŝ Ă Ŷ W Ă ƌ Ŭ Ɛ Θ Z Ğ Đ ƌ Ğ Ă Ɵ Ž Ŷ DĞ ƌ ŝ Ě ŝ Ă Ŷ ͕ / Ě Ă Ś Ž ϴ ϯ ϲ ϰ Ϯ De s i g n C o n c e p t 0 100 200SCALE DR O P O F F FU T U R E PO N D TH R O U G H C O N N E C T I O N AMPHITHEATER RESTROOM SH E L T E R ART PARKING MA R G A R E T PO N D (E X I S T I N G ) BO I S E R I V E R PA R K I N G (1 6 7 ) AR T ME A D O W PL A N T I N G S LA W N (I R R I G A T E D ) PI C N I C SH E L T E R LAWN (IRRIGATED)PARKING(150)SLOUGH &HIGH WATERSEASONAL (193)FISHING DOCK BOAT DROP OFF SH E L T E R RESTROOMART PRIMARY VEHICULAR ACCESS BE A C H BOIS E R I V E R TO AR T AR T ART DI S C G O L F CO U R S E DI S C G O L F CO U R S E DI S C G O L F CO U R S E BE A C H APPROXIMATE FLOODWAY BOUNDARY S L O U G H (1 4 ) NO T E S • T H I S I S A P R E L I M I N A R Y C O N C E P T , I N T E N D E D T O S H O W P O S S I B I L I T I E S F O R DE V E L O P M E N T O F T H E M A R G A R E T A L D A P E P A R K S I T E . • N O S U R V E Y D A T A W A S A V A I L A B L E A T T H E T I M E T H I S C O N C E P T W A S P R E P A R E D . B A S E IN F O R M A T I O N W A S C O M P I L E D F R O M E X I S T I N G B O U N D A R Y D A T A A N D A E R I A L PH O T O G R A P H Y . • T H I S P R E L I M I N A R Y C O N C E P T H A S N O T Y E T B E E N P R E S E N T E D I N A P U B L I C F O R U M , A N D DI D N O T U N D E R G O A N I N D I V I D U A L P U B L I C I N P U T P R O C E S S . • R O A D S A N D P A R K I N G A R E A S M A Y B E P A V E D O R S U R F A C E D W I T H P E R M E A B L E P A V E R S OR C O M P A C T E D G R A V E L , T O B E D E T E R M I N E D . PU B L I C A R T • A R T W I L L B E F O C U S E D P R I M A R I L Y O N A L D A P E F A M I L Y H I S T O R Y , B A S Q U E CU L T U R A L H E R I T A G E , L O C A L W I L D L I F E A N D R E L A T E D T H E M E S • A R T E L E M E N T S W I L L B E I N T E G R A T E D W I T H P A R K A R C H I T E C T U R A L F E A T U R E S • A R T W I L L B E P L A C E D S O A S T O C R E A T E A S E N S E O F D I S C O V E R Y F O R P A R K V I S I T O R S GR E E N B E L T VEHICULAR/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, TYP. ME A D O W PL A N T I N G S PE D E S T R I A N BR I D G E , T Y P . EX I S T I N G U N D E R S T O R Y VE G E T A T I O N , T Y P . EX I S T I N G T R E E S , T Y P . AR T AR T AR T AR T DR A F T Ci t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g Ci t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g Ci t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g Ci t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g De c e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 1 5 De c e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 1 5 De c e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 1 5 De c e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 1 5 It e m s # 7 A : B u l l R a n c h S u b d i v i s i o n - Z o n i n g & A e r i a l M ap s It e m s # 7 F : J a c k s o n H e a d q u a r t e r s V a c a t i o n - Z o n i n g & A e r ia l M a p s Ja c k s o n H e a d q u a r t e r s V a c a t i o n – Ar e a p r o p o s e d t o b e v a c a t e d It e m # 7 G : S o u t h M e r i d i a n - V i c i n i t y M a p So u t h M e r i d i a n – A Z Bo u n d a r y w i t h P r o p o s e d Zo n i n g D i s t r i c t s So u t h M e r i d i a n - F L U M M a p So u t h M e r i d i a n – P h a s e d Ut i l i t y P l a n It e m # 7 H : S h e l b u r n e S u b d i v i s i o n N o . 1 – F P Z o n i n g M a p Fi n a l P l a t Preliminary Plat It e m s # 7 I : U n a M a s – D e v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t M o d i f i c a t io n Zo n i n g / A e r i a l M a p Co n c e p t u a l E l e v a t i o n s It e m # 7 K : T w e l v e O a k s C e n t e r S u b d i v i s i o n 16 0 45 5 15 8 0 1 5 3 5 17 0 1 17 1 1 11 5 19 2 5 34 2 37 4 16 2 5 17 6 7 27 5 1 7 9 5 31 8 27 6 1 7 4 9 1 7 6 7 34 3 1 8 0 1 1 7 28 1 8 0 0 30 1 1 7 2 7 31 0 21 3 0 18 4 5 16 8 0 25 1 33 2 17 02 18 2 1 1 7 6 6 15 3 5 21 5 5 19 5 0 32 5 15 6 8 17 3 4 1 7 8 9 37 5 11 0 15 7 1 44 1 1 7 6 5 31 1 16 8 0 17 3 5 15 1 1 7 5 4 1 8 4 6 19 0 1 17 5 0 65 23 9 1 7 7 6 1 8 6 8 18 7 0 28 0 19 5 0 17 2 0 20 7 5 19 7 0 25 0 23 8 1 8 2 4 1 9 0 4 34 7 32 3 22 1 5 1 9 2 6 34 9 1 6 9 9 18 0 0 R1 TN - R C- C R1 C- N R1 W F r a n k l i n R d N L i c h i t e A v e W G r e e n h e a d D r e W B a W C a l c i t e C t N W a r d A v e Zo n i n g Short Plat It e m # 7 L : T M C r e e k E a s t – A n n e x a t i o n & Z o n i n g a n d D e v e lo p m e n t A g r e e m e n t M o d i f i c a t i o n Zo n i n g M a p It e m # 7 M : C a l n o n P r o p e r t i e s – Z o n i n g / A e r i a l M a p Am e n d m e n t t o t h e F u t u r e L a n d U s e M a p Ap p l i c a n t P r o p o s e d C h a n g e & C o n c e p t P l a n Ex i s t i n g F u t u r e L a n d U s e M a p St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C h a n g e Ap p l i c a n t P r o p o s e d Z o n i n g B a s e d o n St a f f ’ s R e c o m m e n d e d C h a n g e t o t h e F L U M St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d Z o n i n g i n S t a f f R e p o r t Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7A Action Items PROJECT NUMBER: AZ -15-013 ITEM TITLE: Bull Ranch Sub.Request for Reconsideration -PP,- 1 - C> Request for Reconsideration by Gem State ER, LLC Located at 6168 N. Elk Ranch Lane for Bull Ranch (AZ -15-013): Annexation and Zoning of 10.06 Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning Disfrict,PP-15-017: Approval Consisting of Fifty (50) Building Lots and Twelve (12) Common Lots on 10.06 Acres of Land in a Proposed R-8 Zoning District MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7B Action Items PROJECT NUMBER: AZ -15-013, PP -15-017 ITEM TITLE: Bull Ranch Subdivision by Gem State ER, LLC Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Denial: AZ 15-013, PP 15-017 Bull Ranch Subdivision by Gem State ER, LLC Located at 6168 N. Elk Ranch Lane, in the NW 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East (Parcel # R1002730200). Request: Annexation of 10.06 Acres of Land With an R-8 Zoning District and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 48 Single - Family Residential Building Lots and 9 Common Lost on 10.06 Acres of Land. MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 Action Items ITEM TITLE: PY 2014 CDBG ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: PY 2014 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION W DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET DATE December 15, 2015 ITEM # PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME 7D PY 2014 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance PLEASE PRINT NAME FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL a s Z CLERKSCITY OFFICE: Co m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t B l o c k G r a n t PY 2 0 1 4 C o n s o l i d a t e d A n n u a l P e r f o r m a n c e an d E v a l u a t i o n R e p o r t ( C A P E R ) Pu b l i c H e a r i n g Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l De c e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 1 5 Se a n K e l l y , C D B G Ad m i n i s t r a t o r Ge o g r a p h i c D i s t r i b u t i o n Hi g h l i g h t s o f P Y 2 0 1 4 Be g a n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e M e r i d i a n B o y s & G i r l s C l u b G y m . Sc h e d u l e d t o c o m p l e t e b y F e b r u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 6 . Be g a n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e I d a h o A v e n u e S i d e w a l k s P r oj e c t . Th i s p r o j e c t c o m p l e t e d j u s t a f t e r t h e s t a r t o f t h e fi s c a l y e a r . Co m p l e t e d c o n s t r u c t i o n o n t h e 8 th St r e e t Pa r k P i c n i c S h e l t e r . Co m p l e t e d c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d i n s t a l l a t i o n o f C e n t e n n i al P a r k AD A R e s t r o o m F a c i l i t y p r o j e c t . Hi g h l i g h t s C o n t i n u e d CA T C H a s s i s t e d 7 h o m e l e s s o r p r e v i o u s h o m e l e s s f a m i li e s ( 2 7 pe r s o n s ) w i t h c a s e m a n a g e m e n t . 6 o f t h e s e h o u s e h o l d s b e c a m e ab l e t o s u s t a i n t h e i r o w n r e n t . Me r i d i a n F o o d B a n k p r o v i d e d f o o d t o o v e r 5 5 , 0 0 0 p e o pl e t h r o u g h o u t th e y e a r . 9 8 . 9 % o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l s a n d h o u s e h o l d s s er v e d w e r e l o w to m o d e r a t e i n c o m e p e r s o n s / h o u s e h o l d s . Me r i d i a n B o y s & G i r l s C l u b p r o v i d e d s c h o l a r s h i p s f o r f e e - b a s e d pr o g r a m s t o 1 6 y o u n g p e o p l e , 1 0 0 % o f w h o m w e r e f r o m l o w - mo d e r a t e i n c o m e f a m i l i e s . Pr o g r a m Y e a r 2 0 1 4 Ex p e n d i t u r e s PY 2 0 1 4 P r o j e c t s A l l o c a t e d E x p e n d e d R e m a i n i n g Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n $ 4 3 , 0 9 1 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 8 3 9 . 8 0 * $ 2 0 , 2 5 1 . 2 0 Me r i d i a n E l e m e n t a r y F i t n e s s P a t h $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 7 , 8 2 5 . 1 2 * $2,174.88 Ho m e l e s s C a s e M a n a g e m e n t ( C A T C H ) $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 1 5 7 . 0 0 * $15,843.00 Me r i d i a n F o o d B a n k $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 Co m m u n i t y C e n t e r F a ç a d e ( Ca n c e l l e d ) $ 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 * $ 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 Ho u s i n g A u t h o r i t y D o w n P a y m e n t A s s i s t a n c e $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 * * $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 St o r e y P a r k A D A U p g r a d e $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 * * $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 Sl u m & B l i g h t A s s e s s m e n t a n d P l a n $ 1 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 * * $ 19,500.00 TO T A L $3 0 0 , 0 9 1 . 0 0 $ 9 9 , 8 2 1 . 9 2 $ 2 0 0 , 2 6 9 . 0 8 * A m o u n t w i l l b e r e a l l o c a t e d t o e l i g i b l e p r o j e c t s . ** P r o j e c t i s p a r t o f t h e P Y 2 0 1 4 S u b s t a n t i a l A m e n d m e nt . St a t u s o f S u b s t a n t i a l Am e n d m e n t P r o j e c t s St o r e y P a r k R e s t r o o m A D A U p g r a d e ( $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 ) Cu r r e n t l y c o n d u c t i n g E n v i r o n m e n t a l A s s e s s m e n t Ex p e c t t o p r o c e e d w i t h P a r k s i n J a n u a r y Ho m e o w n e r D o w n - P a y m e n t A s s i s t a n c e – H o u s i n g A u t h o r i t y ($ 5 0 , 0 0 0 ) Cu r r e n t l y w o r k i n g w i t h 1 f a m i l y t o p u r c h a s e a h o m e in M e r i d i a n ( E x p e c t e d t o cl o s e o n 2 9 D e c e m b e r ) Sl u m a n d B l i g h t A s s e s s m e n t ( $ 1 9 , 5 0 0 ) Re q u e s t f o r P r o p o s a l S p r i n g 2 0 1 6 PY 2 0 1 4 E x p e n d i t u r e s f r o m pr e v i o u s p r o g r a m y e a r s Pr o j e c t ( P r o g r a m y e a r ) Pr i o r Y e a r Re m a i n i n g Ex p e n d e d i n PY 2 0 1 3 R e m a i n i n g 8t h S t r e e t P a r k P i c n i c S h e l t e r ( P Y 2 0 1 3 ) $ 1 7 , 7 5 0 . 7 6 $ 1 7, 7 5 0 . 7 6 $ 0 . 0 0 Ce n t e n n i a l P a r k R e s t r o o m F a c i l i t y ( P Y 2 0 1 3 ) $ 2 , 3 9 7 . 0 0 $ 2, 3 9 7 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 Id a h o A v e n u e S i d e w a l k C o n s t r u c t i o n ( P Y 2 0 1 3 ) $ 1 3 3 , 7 3 0 . 05 $ 4 0 , 2 8 0 . 1 1 * * $ 9 3 , 0 8 0 . 4 4 Bo y s a n d G i r l s C l u b S c h o l a r s h i p ( P Y 2 0 1 3 ) $ 5 , 4 0 4 . 0 0 $ 2 , 51 7 . 0 0 * $ 2 , 8 8 7 . 0 0 To t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s f o r P Y 2 0 1 4 ( n o n - 2 0 1 4 f u n d s ) $ 6 1 , 9 0 3. 1 3 * A m o u n t w i l l b e r e a l l o c a t e d t o e l i g i b l e p r o j e c t s . ** P r o j e c t c o m p l e t e d a f t e r t h e e n d o f t h e p r o g r a m y e ar . Pr o g r a m Y e a r 2 0 1 4 C A P E R • T h e C i t y ’ s F i n a n c e D e p a r t m e n t i s r e v i e w i n g a n d ve r i f y i n g t h e f i n a n c i a l r e p o r t s w i t h i n t h e C A P E R . • P u b l i c C o m m e n t p e r i o d w a s o p e n e d o n N o v e m b e r 30 th , 2 0 1 5 . • N o c o m m e n t s h a v e b e e n r e c e i v e d a t t h i s t i m e . • A n y t e s t i m o n y g i v e n t o d a y w i l l b e i n c l u d e d i n th e C A P E R s u b m i s s i o n t o H U D Re q u e s t e d A c t i o n Co n d u c t t h e P u b l i c H e a r i n g f o r t h e P Y 2 0 1 4 CD B G C A P E R . Co n t i n u e t h e r e s o l u t i o n a d o p t i n g t h e C A P E R un t i l D e c e m b e r 2 2 , 2 0 1 5 ( c o n s e n t i t e m ) . Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7E Action Items PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Resolution PY 2014 CDBG Resolution Number X - 11,Q7_ : PY 2014 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7F Action Mems PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0028 ITEM TITLE: Jackson Headquarters Vacation Vacate a Portion (10x135.5 feet) of the 10 -Foot Wide Public Utility and Drainage Easement Located on the East Boundary of Lot 3, Block 2 and the West Boundary of Lot 4, Block 2 that is Platted with the Commerce Park Subdivision MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: Action Mems PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0019 ITEM TITLE: South Meridian Annexation Request: Annexation and Zoning of 1,322.14 Acres of Land with R-4 (1,241.10 Acres), R-8 (10.37 Acres), R-15 (30.10 Acres) and C -G (40.57 Acres) Zoning Designations MEETING NOTES r_✓ Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7H Action Mems PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0004 ITEM TITLE: Shelburne Subdivision No. 1 Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty -Eight (48) Building Lots and Twelve (12) Common Lots on 19.42 Acres of Land in the R-4 Zoning District MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 71 Action Items PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0016 ITEM TITLE: Una Mas Request: Modification to the Development Agreement to Remove the Requirement for all Building Elevations to be in Substantial Conformance with the Previously Approved Elevations MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7J Action Items PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0024 ITEM TITLE: Eagle Commons at Overland Request: Execute a Development Agreement Required with the Annexation of the Property for the Purpose of Including a Concept Plan and Specific Provisions Relevant to the Development of the Property MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7K Action Mems PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0025 ITEM TITLE: Twelve Oaks Center Subdivision Request: Short Plat Approval Consisting of Four (4) Building Lots on 1.44 Acres of Land in a C -C Zoning District MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7L1 Action Items PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0018 ITEM TITLE: TM Creek East Request: Annexation and Zoning of 14.93 Acres of Land with an R-40 Zoning District Request: Modification to the Development Agreement (Inst. # 1 140457759) for TM Creek to Include the Subject 14.93 Acre Parcel in the Agreement MEETING NOTES 5 i Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7L2 Action Items PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0018 ITEM TITLE: TM Creek East Request: Modification to the Development Agreement (Inst. # 1 140457759) for TM Creek to Include the Subject 14.93 Acre Parcel in the Agreement MEETING NOTES , M , Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7M1 Action Items PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0017 ITEM TITLE: Calnon Properties 2215 W Franklin Rd. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 55.55 Acres of Land with C -C (40.06 Acres), TN -C (5.46 Acres) and TN -R (10.03 Acres) Zoning Districts MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS 1 Ten Mile Urban Renewal District Study Area & Sub-Districts 2 3 B C 4 MU-C Dwelling Units 32.9 ac X 30% X 8 du/ac = 79 units MU-R Dwelling Units 22.7 ac X 60% X 8 du/ac = 109 units Minimum Residential Units For Site: 188 P&Z Hearing Slide DA Requirement 1.1.1.d 5 DA Requirement 1.1.1.d Minimum Residential Units For Site: 218 R-40 Dwelling Units 7.22 ac X 12 du/ac = 86 units TN-R Dwelling Units 8.95 ac X 75% X 8 du/ac = 54 units C-C Dwelling Units 32.84 ac X 30% X 8 du/ac = 78 units Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 7M2 Action Items PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0017 ITEM TITLE: Calnon Properties 2215 W Franklin Rd. Request: Amendment to the Future Land Use Map Contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan to Change the Land Use Designation on 40.06 Acres of Land from Medium High and High Density Residential to Mixed Use Commercial; and 15.49 Acres of Land from Medium, Medium -High and High Density Residential to Mixed Use Residential MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: N1 Action Mems PROJECT NUMBER: H-2015-0011 ITEM TITLE: UDC Text Amendment 2015 UDC Sections: Definitions; Residential Dimensional Standards; Fencing; Structure and Site and Multi -Family Design Standards; Common Open Space and Site Amenity Requirements; Specific Use Standards for Drinking Establishments, Flex Space and Home Occupations; Timelines for Signatures on Development Agreements; Subdivision Design and Improvement Standards and Other Miscellaneous Sections; AND 2) Reformat of the Meridian Design Manual Including Reducing Duplicate Guidelines Removing Site Design MEETING NOTES �— LLDC VVI Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS De s i g n R e v i e w De s i g n M a n u a l O v e r h a u l – A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l De c e m b e r 1 5 , 2 0 1 5 Ba c k g r o u n d R e f r e s h e r – W h y t h e O v e r h a u l ? • S t r e a m l i n e t h e D e s i g n M a n u a l ; • E m p h a s i s c o n s i s t e n t a p p l i c a t i o n ; • R e - c a t e g o r i z e e x i s t i n g i t e m s a n d b e t t e r co r r e l a t e w i t h C i t y p o l i c y ; • E l i m i n a t e d u p l i c a t e s a n d c o n s o l i d a t e si m i l a r i t e m s ; • F o c u s o n B u i l d i n g d e s i g n e l e m e n t s ; • F o c u s o n “ e x p r e s s s t a n d a r d s ” ; a n d • R e l o c a t e s i t e d e v e l o p m e n t i t e m s t o e i t h e r th e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n o r U n i f i e d De v e l o p m e n t C o d e [ F U T U R E ] Pr o g r e s s Si n c e t h e l a s t C i t y C o u n c i l u p d a t e : • R e m o v e d a f e w p a r a g r a p h s f r o m t h e In t r o d u c t i o n . T h e i n t e n t i s f o r t h a t t o b e re l o c a t e d t o U D C w i t h n e x t u p d a t e • F o r t h e s t a n d a r d s , s o m e m i n o r gr a m m a t i c a l te x t t w e a k s - n o si g n i f i c a n t c h a n g e s • S o m e f o r m a t t i n g i m p r o v e m e n t s • A d d e d m o r e p h o t o s Re m o v e d T e x t ( P a g e A -4 ) Ap p l i c a b i l i t y Ad m i n i s t r a t i v e D e s i g n R e v i e w , a s e s t a b l i s h e d i n C h a pt e r 5 , A r t i c l e B , S e c t i o n 8 o f t h e U n i f i e d D e v e l o p ment Co d e ( U D C ) , a n d i n c o n f o r m a n c e w i t h t h e C i t y o f M e r id i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l s h a l l b e re q u i r e d f o r a l l : • Ne w c o m m e r c i a l , i n d u s t r i a l , i n s t i t u t i o n a l , p u b l i c o r q u a s i - p u b l i c d e v e l o p m e n t s u b j e c t t o t h e f o l l o w i n g ap p r o v a l s : c o n d i t i o n a l u s e , c e r t i f i c a t e o f z o n i n g c om p l i a n c e a n d / o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s t h a t i n c l u d e e x t e rior bu i l d i n g i m p r o v e m e n t s . • Ne w a t t a c h e d r e s i d e n t i a l s t r u c t u r e s c o n t a i n i n g t w o or m o r e d w e l l i n g u n i t s . • Ex t e r i o r b u i l d i n g a l t e r a t i o n s , i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l im i t e d t o : t h e a d d i t i o n , r e m o v a l , o r m o d i f i c a t i o n o f ar c h i t e c t u r a l e l e m e n t s , s u c h a s d o o r s , w i n d o w s , a w n in g s , a n d a r c a d e s ; b u i l d i n g r e m o d e l s w h e r e a l l o r a p o r t i o n o f a s t r u c t u r e i s m o d i f i e d , i n c l u d i n g e n t ra n c e s , f a ç a d e s , r o o f l i n e s , a n d b u i l d i n g e x p a n s i o n s ; a ch a n g e i n e x t e r i o r m a t e r i a l s a n d / o r c o l o r s c h e m e ; o r a n y o t h e r a l t e r a t i o n t h a t m o d i f i e s t h e e x t e r i o r ap p e a r a n c e o f t h e b u i l d i n g , a p p r o v e d c o n d i t i o n s , a n d/ o r t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s i n t h e U D C a n d / o r t h e C i t y o f Me r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l . ( N o t e : F o r e x i s t i n g b u i l d i n g s , o n l y t h e e l e m e n t ( s ) b e i n g al t e r e d , e n l a r g e d , r e m o v e d o r o t h e r w i s e m o d i f i e d w i ll b e s u b j e c t t o c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e M a n u a l . ) Pu b l i c I n v o l v e m e n t Ea r l y o n : • D e s i g n M a n u a l W o r k g r o u p s – T h e r e w a s a S e r i e s o f m e e t i n g s o v e r se v e r a l m o n t h s , b e g i n n i n g i n D e c o f 20 1 4 Po s t D r a f t , i n v i t a t i o n s t o c o m m e n t : • B r o a d e r d e s i g n f i r m o u t r e a c h • I d a h o B u i l d i n g C o n t r a c t o r s A s s o c i a t i o n (8 / 1 1 / 1 5 ) Of f i c i a l A p p l i c a t i o n : • P l a n n i n g & Z o n i n g C o m m i s s i o n (1 1 / 1 9 / 1 5 ) . R e c o m m e n d e d a p p r o v a l o f UD C r e v i s i o n t o e n a b l e . • C i t y C o u n c i l ( T o d a y ) Ne x t S t e p s • S i t e D e s i g n e l e m e n t s t h a t w e r e r e m o v e d wi l l b e r e v i s i t e d l a t e r , a n d i n c o r p o r a t e d in t o t h e U D C o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n • A d d i t i o n a l U D C c h a n g e s l a t e r t o fo r m a l i z e s o m e o f t h e p r o c e s s f o r t h i s , su c h a s t h e d e s i g n st a n d a r d e x c e p t i o n s • To n i g h t , s e e k i n g a p p r o v a l t o re f e r e n c e t h i s n e w d o c u m e n t i n t h e UD C . Qu e s t i o n s ? Th e d r a f t c h a n g e s t o t h e U D C i n c l u d e t h e f o l l o w i n g sections: De f i n i t i o n s Di m e n s i o n a l S t a n d a r d s o f t h e R e s i d e n t i a l D i s t r i c t s Re m o v a l o f G r a v e l M i n i n g f r o m t h e U D C Co m m o n L o t F e n c i n g De s i g n S t a n d a r d s ( F i r s t P h a s e ) La n d s c a p i n g S t a n d a r d s Pa r k i n g S t a n d a r d s Sp e c i f i c U s e S t a n d a r d s Ti m i n g f o r S i g n a t u r e o n t h e D A Va r i o u s M i s c e l l a n e o u s S e c t i o n s UD C T e x t C h a n g e s Di m e n s i o n a l S t a n d a r d s (G o a l : T o e n c o u r a g e d e n s i t i e s m o r e i n l i n e w i t h t h e UDC an d C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n ) R- 2 : M i n i m u m L o t S i z e : 10 , 0 0 0 ( 1 2 , 0 0 0 ) sq u a r e f e e t Mi n i m u m S t r e e t F r o n t a g e : 70 ( 8 0 ) fe e t R- 4 : M i n i m u m L o t S i z e : 6, 0 0 0 ( 8 , 0 0 0 ) sq u a r e f e e t Mi n i m u m S t r e e t F r o n t a g e : 50 ( 6 0 ) fe e t R- 8 : M i n i m u m L o t S i z e : 4, 0 0 0 ( 5 , 0 0 0 ) sq u a r e f e e t Mi n i m u m S t r e e t F r o n t a g e : 40 ( 5 0 ) fe e t ; a l l e y l o a d a n d m e w 32 ( 4 0 ) fe e t R- 1 5 : M i n i m u m L o t S i z e : 2, 0 0 0 ( 2 , 4 0 0 ) sq u a r e f e e t R- 4 0 : M i n i m u m L o t S i z e : 1, 0 0 0 ( 1 , 2 0 0 ) sq u a r e f e e t UD C T e x t C h a n g e s Co n c e p t u a l L a y o u t U s i n g E x i s t i n g R - 8 D i m e n s i o n a l S t andards Co n c e p t u a l L a y o u t U s i n g P r o p o s e d R - 8 D i m e n s i o n a l S t andards Re m o v e G r a v e l M i n i n g a s a n a l l o w e d u s e i n t h e U D C : (In 20 1 4 , s a n d a n d g r a v e l m i n i n g w a s r e m o v e d a s a n a l l o we d u s e i n t h e r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t s ) UD C T e x t C h a n g e s Us e C - N C - C L - O C - G M - E H - E I - L I - H O - T T N - C T N - C Co n s t r u c t i o n s a n d an d g r a v e l m i n i n g C C C C C C C C C C C Co m m o n L o t F e n c i n g UD C T e x t C h a n g e s De s i g n S t a n d a r d s As p a r t o f P h a s e 1 o f t h e D e s i g n M a n u a l u p d a t e , a l l b u i l d i n g d e s i g n s t a n d a r d s ar e p r o p o s e d t o b e r e m o v e d f r o m t h e U D C ; s u b j e c t t o th e g u i d e l i n e s i n t h e Ar c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l ( a k a C i t y o f M e r i d i a n D e s i g n M a n u a l ) . Ph a s e 2 w i l l i n c l u d e t h e a d d i t i o n a n d / o r m o d i f i c a t i on s t o t h e r e m a i n i n g s i t e de s i g n s t a n d a r d s i n t h e U D C 1 1 - 3 A - 1 9 . UD C T e x t C h a n g e s La n d s c a p i n g U n i m p r o v e d R O W Pr o p o s e d L a n g u a g e : If t h e u n i m p r o v e d s t r e e t r i g h t o f w a y i s t e n f e e t ( 10 ’ ) o r g r e a t e r f r o m t h e e d g e of p a v e m e n t t o e d g e o f s i d e w a l k o r p r o p e r t y l i n e , an d s t r e e t w i d e n i n g p r o j e c t i s no t i n t h e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a u t h o r i t y ’ s f i v e ( 5 ) y e a r f u n d e d p l a n , th e d e v e l o p e r sh a l l m a i n t a i n a t e n f o o t ( 1 0 ’ ) c o m p a c t e d s h o u l d e r me e t i n g t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n st a n d a r d s o f t h e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a u t h o r i t y a n d l a n d s ca p e t h e r e m a i n d e r w i t h la w n o f o t h e r v e g e t a t i v e g r o u n d c o v e r . UD C T e x t C h a n g e s Op e n S p a c e a n d S i t e A m e n i t i e s Cu r r e n t U D C S t a n d a r d s : • Un d e r 5 a c r e s – N o t R e q u i r e d • 5- 2 0 A c r e s – 1 0 % a n d o n e a m e n i t y • 20 + A c r e s - 1 0 % a n d o n e a m e n i t y f o r e v e r y 2 0 a c r e s Pr o p o s e d C h a n g e s t o t h e U D C : Fo r r e s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t s w i t h r e s i d e n t i a l l o t s iz e s a v e r a g i n g t e n t h o u s a n d ( 1 0 , 0 0 0 ) s q u a r e fe e t o r m o r e o r d e v e l o p m e n t s w i t h i n a q u a r t e r ( 1 / 4 ) m i l e o f a C i t y r e g i o n a l p a r k o r a n e i g h t h (1 / 8 ) o f a m i l e o f a C i t y c o m m u n i t y p a r k s h a l l o n l y c o m p l y w i t h t h e s i t e a m e n i t i e s i n a c c o r d w i t h su b s e c t i o n C . Qu a l i f i e d O p e n S p a c e Pi c n i c a r e a w h i c h i n c l u d e s t a b l e s , b e n c h e s a n d a s t ru c t u r e f o r s h a d e ; Ad d i t i o n a l f i v e p e r c e n t ( 5 % ) q u a l i f i e d o p e n s p a c e o f a t l e a s t 2 0 , 0 0 0 s q u a r e f e e t UD C T e x t C h a n g e s Qu e s t i o n s ? UD C T e x t C h a n g e s 1 Proposed UDC Text Amendment UDC Section Topic Problem/Question Potential Fix 11-1-1 Broken Reference Section 11-1-1 references 1-1-3, which no longer exists pursuant to a recent re-numbering of Title 1. Upon adoption by the Meridian city council, this title is declared to be and shall hereafter constitute the official zoning ordinance of the city of Meridian. This title shall be known and cited as the UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN. The unified developmen t code of the city of Meridian is published by authority of the Meridian city council, and it shall be kept up to date as provided in section 1-1-3 of this code. Within this title, the unified development code of the city of Meridian shall be referred to as "this tit le". 11-1A-1 Abandoned definition Modify the definition of abandoned. ABANDONED: To cease or discontinue a use or activity for twelve (12) months without apparent intent to resume. 11-1A-1 Automobile definition Work with Legal to incorporate language that restricts commercial vehicles from parking in residential districts. AUTOMOBILE: A vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of under twelve thousand (12,000) pounds primarily designed f or transporting passengers and light cargo upon streets. 11-1A-1 Dwelling, secondary definition Received an inquiry from a citizen regarding the establishment of tiny homes. DWELLING, SECONDARY: A habitable dwelling unit established in conjunction with and subordinate to a single -family dwelling unit constructed on a foundation and connected to municipal services. The term shall include guest-house, granny flat, tiny house, carriage house, and garage apartment and caretaker unit. 11-1A-1 Fence, semi-private definition The UDC does not currently contain provisions for semi- private fencing. A fence that does not restrict or impede vision or sight through the fence by more than fifty percent (50%). 11-1A-1 Flex space definition Currently, the flex space definition does not include other uses that may also be appropriate as small-scale flex space uses FLEX SPACE: The use of a site building or portion thereof for small-scale warehousing and/or light industry with associated offices, and/or retail showroom space. Flexibility in use of the interior spaces and low scale, attractive exterior appearance characterize flex buildings. 11-1A-1 Parking lot definitions Clarify parking lot maintenance/overlay and reconstruction. PARKING LOT OVERLAY: Any resurfacing of The addition of one or more layers of pavement over an existing parking lot areas with asphalt or other permanent material. PARKING LOT REPLACEMENT RECONSTRUCTION: Removal and replacement of an existing parking surface done for the purpose of improvement or repair. 11-2A-3D.3 Accessory detached structures Keep shed size requirements consistent with the IRC. Request from BCA. 3. One detached accessory building that is exempt from a permit as defined by the currently adopted International Residential Code that does not exceed one hundred twenty (120) square feet in area and eight feet (8') or less in height shall be allowed in the required rear yard. In no case shall an accessory building be allowed in the street yard or the required side yard. Table 11-2A-4 Dimensional standards for the R-2 district Reduce the lot size and minimum street frontage requirements. Minimum property size/dwelling unit (in square feet) 12,000 10,000 Minimum street frontage (in feet) 80 70 Rear setback (in feet) 15 Interior side setback (in feet) 7.5/story Street setback (in feet): Local 20 Collector 25 Street landscape buffer (in feet): Collector 20 Arterial 25 Entryway corridor 35 Interstate 50 Maximum building height (in feet) 35 Minimum living area (in square feet): 1,500 Minimum ground floor area for multi-story units (in square feet) 800 2 Table 11-2A-5 Dimensional standards for the R-4 district Reduce the lot size and minimum street frontage requirements and add a setback for alleys so subdivisions can develop closer to the intended density. Minimum property size/dwelling unit (in square feet) 8,000 6000 Minimum street frontage (in feet) 60 50 Rear setback (in feet) 15 Interior side setback (in feet) 5 Street setback to front loaded garage (in feet): Local 20 Collector 25 Alley 5 Street setback to living area and/or side loaded garage (in feet): Local 15 Collector 25 Alley 5 Street landscape buffer (in feet): Collector 20 Arterial 25 Entryway corridor 35 Interstate 50 Maximum building height (in feet) 35 Minimum living area (in square feet): Detached 1,400 Attached 800 Minimum ground floor area for multi-story units (in feet) 800 Table 11-2A-6 Dimensional standards for the R-8 district Reduce the lot size and minimum street frontage requirements and add a setback for alleys so subdivisions can develop closer to the intended density. Minimum property size/dwelling unit (in square feet) 5,000 4000 Single-family detached dwelling unit with garage facing the front property line 5,000 Single-family detached dwelling unit with common driveway, alley loaded garage, or private street mew lots 4,000 Single-family attached and two-family duplex dwelling unit 4,000 Any corner property 5,000 Minimum street frontage single family detached dwelling unit (in feet): With garage facing street 50 Minimum street frontage -single family attached, townhouse, and two-family duplex dwelling unit (in feet) 40 Minimum street frontage (in feet) 50 40 With alley loaded garage, side entry garage, or private mew lots 32 Street setback to garage (in feet): Local 20 Collector 25 Alley 5 Street setback to living area (in feet): Local 15 10 Collector 25 Alley 5 Interior side setback (in feet) 5 Rear setback (in feet) 12 Street landscape buffer (in feet): Collector 20 Arterial 25 Entryway corridor 35 Interstate 50 Maximum building height (in feet) 35 3 C-N C-C C-G L-O M-E H-E Construction sand and gravel mining I-L I-H Construction sand and gravel mining O-T TN-C TN-R Construction sand and gravel mining Table 11-2A-7 Dimensional standards for the R-15 district Add a setback for alleys. Minimum property size/dwelling unit (in square feet) 2,400 2000 Minimum street frontage (in feet) 0 Street setback to garage (in feet): Local 20 Collector 25 Alley 5 Street setback to living area (in feet): Local 10 Collector 20 Alley 5 Interior side setback (in feet) 3 Rear setback (in feet) 12 Street landscape buffer (in feet): Collector 20 Arterial 25 Entryway corridor 35 Interstate 50 Maximum building height (in feet) 40 Table 11-2A-8 Dimensional standards for the R-40 district Add a setback for alleys and modify the interior side yard and rear yard setback to match the R-15 zoning district. Minimum property size/dwelling unit (in square feet) 1,200 1000 Minimum street frontage (in feet) 0 Rear setback (in feet) 15 12 Interior side setback (in feet) 5/story 3 Street setback to garage (in feet): Local 20 Collector 25 Alley 5 Street setback to living area (in feet): Local 10 Collector 20 Alley 5 Street landscape buffer (in feet): Collector 20 Arterial 25 Entryway corridor 35 Interstate 50 Maximum building height (in feet) 60 Table 11-2B-2 Table 11-2C-2 Table 11-2D-2 Gravel Mining Gravel mining is a high intensity use that is currently allowed by CUP in most zones. There are no specific use standards for gravel mining and this use has created some significant issues for adjacent residential developments. This use is most appropriate in the County, before a property annexes into the City. Remove as an allowed use from all zon es. Table 11-2B-2 Nursing or Residential Care Facility Add nursing or residential care facility as a conditional use permit in the C-G zone. Use C-G Nursing or residential care facility C 11-2D-3C.1 Standards applicable in all traditional neighborhood districts Strike the reference to the City of Meridian Design Manual. This section will be expanded upon with a future application. 1. Street Layout: The street system shall be primarily based on a grid with connections to the existing street system. Street systems shall be consistent with section B-1.2.3, street networks, of the “City of Meridian Design Manual”. 4 11-2D-4B Standards in the Old Town District Currently, staff is working on restructuring the City of Meridian Design Manual. The proposed change to the code section references the proposed name of the renamed document. B. Number of Stories: Minimum number of stories for new construction is two (2) and/or as set forth in the “City of Meridian Architectural Standards Design Manual”. 11-2D-4D Standards in the Old Town District Need to reference the new public works standards. D. Streetscape Improvements: Streetscape improvements within the area bounded by Carlton Avenue, East Third Street, Ada Stree t, and Meridian Road shall be designed in accord with the city of Meridian downtown streetscape design guidelines Public Works Design Standards Manual. (Ord. 10- 1463, 11-3-2010, eff. 11-8-2010) 11-3A-6 Irrigation easement s and common lots Restrictive irrigation easemen ts on buildable lots can create “no man’s land” areas that become an eyesore. C. Easements: In residential districts, irrigation easements wider than ten feet (10’) shall be included in a common lot that is a minimum of twenty feet (20’) wide and outside of a fenced area, unless modified by City Council at a public hearing with notice to surrounding property owners. DC. Impeding Movement Of Water Prohibited: For any irrigation or drainage ditch not within the jurisdiction of an irrigation or drainage district, piping shall not impede the movement of the amount of water crossing the property prior to development or the amount of water delivered to downstream properties. ED. Natural Drainage Courses: All natural drainage courses shall be left undisturbed or be improved in a manner that will improve the hydraulics and ease of maintenance of the channel. Relocation of natural swales is acceptable if the hydraulics and ease of maintenance are provided for. The term "natural drainage course" shall not be deemed to apply to minor swales and depressions that are located entirely on the applicant's property and which serve a relatively small area where runoff is infrequent. (Ord. 05 -1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) 11-3A-7A.7 Common area fencing Currently, the UDC restricts fencing along interior common area and micro -paths to 4' closed/6' open. Applicants have argued that this only should apply if the common area is not clearly visible from a public street. Further, applicants have also requested to have a taller fence to keep animals/children in while still allowing privacy. 7. Regulations for fences along abutting pathways and common open space areas lots are set forth below. These regulations are intended to assist in the implementation of CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) strategies to reduce the incidence of crime and improve the quality of life. See figure 1 of this section. a. The developer is responsible for constructing fences adjacent abutting micropathways connections and common open space areas lots to distinguish common from private areas. b. Fences adjacent abutting all pathways, and common open space lots not entirely visible from a public street shall be: 1) An open vision or semi-private fence up to six feet (6') in height, as it provides visibility from adjacent homes or buildings; 2) A closed vision fence up to six feet (6’) in height may be allowed if the lot depth does not exceed one (1) lot, connects directly to a public school or a park and is visible from a public street; or 3) If closed vision fencing is used, it shall not exceed four feet (4') in height. This does not allow four feet (4') of closed vision fence with two feet (2') of open vision fencing. An additional two feet (2’) in height of open vision fencing may be provided to the top section of the fence. c. Other fences located within the rear or side yard of properties abutting pathways and common open space lots not entirely visible from a public street shall be set back a minimum of eight feet (8') from the property line. Within the rear yard other fences shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the property width. d. These restrictions are intended to apply to fencing along interior common open space areas lots and pathways that are not entirely visible from a public street. They are not intended to apply to street buffers or entryway landscaping strips. These restrictions are not intended to require fencing on interior common open space. 11-3A-7C.8 Alley Fencing 8. Rear yard of alley accessed properties and alley side yard properties: All fences within the required rear yard shall comply with the fencing standards in accord with UDC 11-3A-7A.7. Fences shall be set back a minimum of five feet (5’) from the alley (measured from p roperty line). 5 Figure 1 Fence Regulations Adding graphics of fencing types along pathways and common open space lots 6 11-3A-19A and B Structure and site design standards Design review standards do not contain enough specificity or "express regulations". This lack of clear requirements can create some difficulty when trying to apply the design standards. There is a separate committee working concurrently on new standards. A. Minimum Standards: The following minimum standards shall apply in addition to the detailed guidelines as set forth in the "City Of Meridian Architectural Standards Design Manual": 1. Architectural Character: Buildings shall be designed in accord with the “City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual. a. Facades: Building facades visible from a public street or public space shall incorporate modulations in the facade, includ ing, but not limited to, projections, recesses, and step backs that articulate wall planes and break up building mass. Facades shall be modulated and articulated in accord with the "City Of Meridian Design Manual". b. Primary Entrance(s): The primary building entrance(s) shall be clearly defined by the architectural design of the building . c. Rooflines: Roof design shall provide variations in profile through modulation and/or articulation in accord with the "City Of Meridian Design Manual ", including, but not limited to, the following: 1) overhanging eaves; 2) sloped roofs; 3) two (2) or more roof planes; 4) varyi ng parapet heights; and 5) cornices. d. Pattern Variations: Architectural building design shall not create blank wall segments along public streets and/or adjacen t public spaces. Architectural elements, including, but not limited to, windows, awnings and arcades, shall have color, texture and/or materials to mitigate blank walls. e. Mechanical Equipment: All ground level mechanical equipment shall be screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property line. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened as viewed from the farthest edge of the adjoining right of way. 2. Materials: a. Exterior building designs shall demonstrate the appearance and use of high quality materials, including, but not limited t o, stone, brick, wood or other natural materials, tinted or textured masonry block, textured or architecturally detailed concrete panels, or stucco or stucco like s ynthetic materials. b. Smooth faced concrete block, prefabricated steel panels, and/or vinyl are prohibited as finish materials bu t may be approved as accent materials in accord with the "City Of Meridian Design Manual". c. Untextured concrete panels are prohibited as finish and/or accent materials. (Ord. 09-1394, 3-3-2009, eff. retroactive to 2-4-2009) 3. Parking Lots: 3.4. Pedestrian Walkways: B. Alternative Compliance: If: 1) the location of existing buildings or structures prevents conformance with the standards of this section and/or the guidelines of the "City Of Meridian Design Manual", or 2) strict adherence to such standards and/or guidelines would create inconsistency in the design objectives of the proposed development, the director may consider an alternative design proposal through the alternative comp liance provisions as set forth in section 11-5B-5 of this title. The director may approve, or recommend approval of, such an alternative compliance proposal when the overall design, as proposed by the applicant, meets or exceeds the intent and the requirements of this section and the "City Of Meridian Design Manual" and is not detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare. 11-3B-7C.5a Landscaping within right of way Modify standards to require developers to landscape the dedicated ROW regardless of the timing for the roadway expansion. a. If the unimproved street right of way is ten feet (10’) or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, and street widening project is not in the transportation authority’s five (5) year funded plan, the developer shall maintain a ten foot (10’) compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn of other vegetative ground cover . 11-3B-8B.2 Parking lot reconstruction The use of the word repaving is not consistent with the definitions section of the code. 2. For parking lot reconstruction, exclusive of sealing, striping, or overlaying repaving, all current landscape standards of this section shall be met, unless approved as set forth in section 11-1B-4 of this title. 7 TABLE 11-3C-6 Parking pad for alley loaded units Allow structures to be 5-feet from the alley and clarifying the parking pad will still need to be required along the side of the garage or if an equivalent off-street parking is provided in accord with UDC Table 11-3C-5. Note 2. The parking pad shall be measured from edge of sidewalk or edge of paved travel lane (public street, private street, or al ley) where no sidewalk exists. For alley accessed properties the parking pad is not required in front of the garage if the garage is located at the five (5) foot setback to the rear property line; the required parking pad must be provided along the side of the garage unless equivalent off -street parking, as determined by the director, is provided in accord with UDC Table 11-3C-5. 11-3C-6B.1 and 2 Required number of off street parking spaces Add a standard that requires the parking for the facility to be based on the square footage of the office and not the square footage of all the structures. 1. In all commercial and residential districts the requireme nt shall be one space for every five hundred (500) square feet of gross floor area, except for self-service storage facilities which shall only require parking based on the gross floor area of any office space. 2. In all industrial districts the requirement shall be one space for every two thousand (2,000) square feet of gross floor area , except for self-service storage facilities which shall only require parking based on the gross floor area of the office space. 11-3D-5A.5 Setbacks and Sign location of freestanding signs The code currently required Subdivision identification signs to meet the same setback as Business Identification Signs, 12.5’ from rear and interior side property lines. This setback can limit construction on most common lots. Change setback to 5 feet in the residential districts. 5. All subdivision identification signs shall meet the setback standards in subsection 11 -3D-8A3 of this article. No part of a subdivision identification sign, including the footing, shall be located closerthan one foot (1’) from any street property line and five feet (5’) from any rear or interior side property line, unless greater separation is required. 11-3G-3A.1 Common Open Space and Site Amenity Requirements For large developments the additional 5% open space can be a large quantity of land. Should the amenity allowance for additional open space be proportional to the size of the development? 1. The total land area of all common open space that meets the standards as set forth in subsection B of this section shall equal or exceed ten percent (10%) of the gross land area of the development. For residential developments with residential lot sizes averaging ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more or developments within a quarter (1/4) mile of a City regional park or an eighth (1/8) of a mile of a City community park shall only comply with the site amenities in accord with subsection C. 11-3G-3B5.e and f Qualified open space e. Picnic area which includes tables, benches and a structure for shade; f. Additional five percent (5%) qualified open space of at least 20,000 square feet 11-4-3-10B Drinking Establishment Code needs to mirror State language and allow existing DE’s to be permitted even if a church, school or adult entertainment moves next to them. B. The drinking establishment shall not be located within three hundred feet (300') of a property used for a ch urch or any other place of worship, or any public or private education institution, Nnor shall the drinking establishment be located within one thousand feet (1,000') of an adult entertainment establishment; provided, that this limitation shall not apply to any duly licensed premises that at the time of licensing did not come within the restricted area but subsequent to licensing came therein; the expansion of an existing establishment may be allowed with the approval of a conditional use permit as set forth in section 11-5B-6 of this title. 11-4-3-11C.1 Drive through establishments Council has provided staff with direction to look at our drive through standards to ensure cars are not stacking in the main drive aisles. 1. Stacking lanes shall have sufficient capacity to prevent obstruction of the public right of way and/or shared drive aisles by patrons. Completed with ZOA-15-001. 11-4-3-18 Flex space Include standards to limit the size of light industry uses allowed under the flex space definition . FLEX SPACE: A. Office and/or retail showroom areas shall comprise a minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the structure and/or tenant space. B. Light industry and warehousing shall not comprise more than seventy percent (70%) of the tenant space. C. In the C-C, C-G and M-E districts, roll-up doors shall not be visible from a public street. D. Except in the I-L and I-H districts, loading docks are prohibited. E. Retail use shall not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of leasable area in any tenant space. 11-4-3-21B Home occupation Clarify that 25% of the “dwelling” is actually the living area (excludes garage.) Also allow business to be conducted within garage. B. The home occupation shall be conducted entirely in the dwelling, and not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the gross floor area overall living area of said dwelling shall be used for a home occupation or for storing goods associated with the home occupation. Materials may be stored in an attached garage or storage area, An attached garage may be used for a home occupation provided it shall not reduce the required off street parking below the standard established for that district and the area being used for the home occupation is calculated to be no greater than twenty five percent (25%) of the overall living area of the dwelling. 8 11-4-3-27B.6, E, F and G Multi-family development Rename City of Meridian Design Manual with City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual under the architectural character and remove references to the City of Meridian Design Manual from the parking and landscape sections. These areas will be further defined with a future zoning text amendment. B. Site Design: 6. The parking shall meet the requirements set forth in Chapter 3, “Regulations Applying To All Districts”, of this title. and shall be in accord with the “City of Meridian Design Manual”. E. Architectural Character: 1. All building elevations shall have a minimum portion of the elevation devoted to architectural features designed to provide articulation a nd variety. These features shall include, but are not limited to, windows, bays and offsetting walls, in accord with the "City Of Meridian Design Manual". 2. Main entrances, which are the primary point(s) of entry where the majority of building users will enter and leave, shall b e designed as an obvious entrance and focal point of the building through architectural treatment, light ing, and address identification. 3. Entrances shall be adequately covered, recessed, or treated with a permanent architectural feature in such a way that weat her protection is provided. 4. Roof forms shall be distinctive and include variety and detail when viewed from the street. Sloped roofs shall have a significant pitch. Flat roofs should include distinctive cornice treatments. 5. Exterior building materials and finishes shall convey an impression of permanence and durability. Materials such as masonr y, stone, stucco, wood, terra cotta, and tile are encouraged. 6. Windows are required to allow views to exterior activity areas or vistas. Windows shall be provided on any building facing any common area used for children's recreation. 7. All roof and wall mounted mechanical, electrical, communications, and service equipment should be screened from public view from the adjacen t public streets and properties by the use of parapets, walls, fences, enclosures, or by other suitable means. F. Landscaping Requirements: 1. Development shall meet the minimum landscaping requirements in accord with chapter 3, "Regulations Applying To All Distric ts", of this title. and shall be in accord with the "City Of Meridian Design Manual". FG. Maintenance And Ownership Responsibilities: All multi-family developments shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features. 11-5A-2C.6 Duties and Authority Rename City of Meridian Design Manual with City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual. 6. The director may convene a committee of design professionals to provide recommendations on the interpretation and application of the guidelines contained in the "City Of Meridian Architectural Standards Design Manual". The committee may also review and make recommendations on alternative compliance requests related to administrative design review. The director shall review and act on recommendations from the committee and shall issue a final determination. 11-5B-1A and B CZC purpose and applicability (DR/Exterior mods only to an existing building) CZC should not be required for simple exterior modification s to existing build ings; DR should be. A. Purpose: The purpose of the certificate of zoning compliance is to ensure that all new building construction or additions, site alterations and/or the establishment of a new use complies with all of the provisions of this title before any construction on the site is started and/or the use is established. B. Applicability: These provisions apply to all requests for permits that involve new building construction, building additions, exterior site alterations and/or the establishment of a new use. These provisions do not apply to tenant interior building improvements where the footprint of the existing structure is not enlarged or to exterior building alterations, including, but not limited to: the addition, removal, or modification of architectural elements, such as doors, wind ows, awnings, and arcades; building remodels where all or a portion of a structure is modified, including entrances, facades, and rooflines, and building expansions; a change in exterior materials and/or color scheme; or any other alteration that modifies the exterior appearance of the building. These provision s do not apply to single-family detached dwellings and/or secondary dwellings. 9 11-5B-1C 3 and 4 CZC expiration clarifications It is unclear when a CZC may expire when issued in conjunction with a building permit – difficult to track and enforce. Combine to just require use or construction to commence within 1 year of CZC issuance. 3. Certificates of zoning compliance issued in conjunction with a proposed use shall expire if said use has not commenced within one year of the date of issuance of the certificate of zoning compliance. 4. Certificates of zoning compliance issued in conjunction with construction or alteration of a structure shall expire if said construction, or alteration, or the use has not commenced within one year of the date of issuance of the certificate of zoning compliance. 54. The certificate of zoning compliance may require inspections and approvals specified in the approval of the application. 11-5B-3D.2 Timeframe to obtain signature on new and amended DA’s Per City Council, two years is too long to allow the property to sign the DA for a property agreed to during the Annexation/Rezone. 2. The city may require a development agreement in conjunction with the annexation or rezone pursuant to Idaho Code section 67 -6511A. When required, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the city within six (6) months two (2) years of the city council granting annexation and/or rezone. 11-5B-3F.2 and 3 2. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the dev elopment agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with chapter 5, “Administration”, of this title. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months two (2) years of the city council granting the modification. 3. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the City if filed prior to the end of the six (6) months two (2) year approval period. 11-5B-5B.2f Alternative Compliance Deviation to the architectural design will be allowed in the in the restructured City of meridian Architectural Standards Manual. f. The proposed architectural and/or site design demonstrates consistency with the "City Of Meridian Design Manual"; or g. Additional environmental quality improvements would result from the alternative compliance. 11-5B-6E.10 Additional findings for construction of sand and gravel mining Removing gravel mining as an allowed use within the City limits therefore; these Findings are no longer necessary. 10. Additional findings for construction sand and gravel mining: a. That the duration and intensity of the proposed mining activities are appropriately addresse d in the conditions of approval; b. That the environmental impacts of the proposed mining activities are appropriately addressed in the conditions of approval , including but not limited to dust, groundwater safety, stormwater runoff, slope stability, and pr eservation of natural resources; c. That the noise impacts and hours of operation of the proposed mining activities are appropriately addressed in the conditi ons of approval; and d. That timing and responsible party of implementing approved reclamation plans are appropriately addressed in the conditions of approval. 11-6C-3A. Subdivision design standards Add a section that prohibits double frontage lots (through properties as defined in the UDC). A. Compliance: 1. Through properties are prohibited except where it is shown that unusual topography or other conditions make it impossible to meet this requirement. Through properties shall be limited to one street access on one frontage, designated by a note on the final plat . 2. The plat shall comply with all applicable requirements as set forth on Chapter 2 “District Regulations”, of this title. 3. The plat shall comply with all applicable requirements as set forth in Chapter 3, “Regulations Applying To All Districts”, of this title. C ity of M eridian ManualArchitectural Standards DRAFT Reference for the City of Meridian Unified Development Code, by resolution No. 15-10XX, on Month, Day Year ManualArchitectural StandardsCity of M eridian DRAFT This Archtiectural Standards Manual is the result of collaboration and input by architects, designers, planners, and other experienced design and construction professionals. It is the hope that these standards are conveyed so as to describe baseline architectural minimums, with creativity, skill, and experience marginalizing their need. Furthermore, it is the goal that this Manual provide greater value to the community as a visual reference. That readers from all backgrounds are able to view and discuss the good work already being done, and build upon it. PrePared by: City of Meridian Community Development Department, Planning Division 33 E Broadway Suite 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 For questions: Phone | 208.884.5533 Fax | 209.888.6854 Ai special thanks to: DRAFT sPecial thanks to: last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) last, first (representing) For their many hours in service to the Meridian Community reviewing, discussing, and providing suggestions for this Architectural Standards Manual. This will be populated, with permission, for individuals and their supporting business/agency, as we get closer to the adoption. Not intended to be used as an endorsement.Aii DRAFT Table of Contents A. Introduction A-3 ■Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-3 Expectation of Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-3 ■Process & Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-4 Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-4 Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-4 Design Standard Exceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-4 ■Manual Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-5 Standards Sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-5 Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-5 Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-5 Additional Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-5 B. How To Use This Document B-3 ■Determining Applicable Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B-3 ■Standards Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B-4 C. Non-Residential Standards C-3 ■Cohesive Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C-3 ■Building Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C-7 ■Building Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C-13 ■Architectural Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C-17 ■Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C-23 ■Signs & Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C-29 D. Residential Standards D-3 ■Cohesive Design Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D-3 ■Building Form Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D-7 ■Architectural Elements, Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D-13 ■Materials, Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D-17 ■Lighting, Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D-21 E. Appendices E-3 ■Appendix 1: Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .E-3 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .E-3 ■Appendix 2: Photo Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .E-7 Index of Photo Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .E-7 Aiii A DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW IntroductionSeCtion A Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | In t r o d u c t i o n AA-1 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Introduction Purpose The Meridian Community Development Department, at the direction of the City Council, has developed this Architectural Standards Manual (Manual) to support Meridian as “a vibrant community whose vision is to be the premier city to live, work and raise a family .” Architectural design can contribute more than just an aesthetic appearance to development . It can also provide an integrated, functional, and coher- ent solution that corroborates the principles of a livable community and the values of the City of Meridian, as expressed in the Comprehensive Plan . The purpose of the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual, is to set and maintain a baseline level of effort for the design and construction of build- ings within the City – particularly new structures . The Manual is not intended to limit creativity or to prioritize one architectural style over another . Rather the intent is to establish minimum standards that the community has agreed should apply to development of new buildings and the alteration of existing buildings . exPectation oF use The expectation of this Manual is to be used as a checklist by design professionals; to verify that basic design principles, safety considerations, and quality of place improvements reflecting the environment that Meridian residents have come to expect, are made . The Manual should be used early in the building design process . Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | In t r o d u c t i o n AA-3 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Process & Application Process The City of Meridian development process encom- passes a wide range of project scales and stages, ranging from annexation and zoning of large acre- age subdivisions, to redevelopment on a single parcel . Typically, design review occurs concurrently with other development applications . Projects that require Administrative Design Review (see Title 11, Chapter 5, Article B, Section 8, Meridian City Code) should meet all requirements and follow supplied checklists . aPPlicability Administrative Design Review as established in Chapter 5, Article B, Section 8 of the Unified Devel - opment Code (UDC), and in conformance with the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual shall be required for all: »New commercial, industrial, institutional, public or quasi-public development subject to the following approvals: conditional use, certificate of zoning compliance and/ or building permits that include exterior building improvements . »New attached residential structures con- taining two or more dwelling units . »Exterior building alterations, including, but not limited to: the addition, removal, or modification of architectural elements, such as doors, windows, awnings, and arcades; building remodels where all or a portion of a structure is modified, including entrances, façades, rooflines, and building expansions; a change in exterior materials and/or color scheme; or any other alteration that modifies the exterior appearance of the building, approved conditions, and/or the requirements in the UDC and/or the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual . (Note: For existing buildings, only the element(s) being altered, enlarged, removed or otherwise modified will be subject to compliance with the Manual .) Administrative Design Review and conformance with the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual shall not be required for interior tenant improvements, detached single-family homes, and/or secondary dwellings unless stipulated as part of a development agreement or as otherwise required by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Com- mission or the Meridian City Council . design standard excePtions As mentioned in the Purpose section above, the intent of administrative design review is not to limit creativity or to prioritize one architectural style over another . The standards in this Manual are general in nature, but evolving construction practices, avail- ability of new materials and products, and creative design and engineering solutions require alternatives to be occasionally considered . The City recognizes that not all sites are conducive to full conformance with the standards contained in the Manual and that strict adherence in some cases may actually create inconsistency and disjointed development patterns . The City encourages innovative design and recognizes that there are many ways to meet the intent, goals and standards contained in the Manual . Therefore, in addition to the explicit inno- vative alternatives enabled within the Manual, the director will consider alternative design proposals through design standard exception requests . The director will consider the following when approving or denying a design standard exception request: »Does the location of existing buildings or structures prevent conformance with the Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | In t r o d u c t i o n AA-4 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW standards of the City of Meridian Archi- tectural Standards Manual; »Does strict adherence to the standards create inconsistency in the design objec- tives of the proposed development; and »Does the specific use require unique site and building development that would otherwise prohibit meeting the intent (e .g . - a secure site)? Any request for design standard exception must be requested in writing concurrent with the adminis- trative design review submittal . The request should specify the following: »the standard(s) that are proposed to be exempt, including the actual text; »the reason the exception is requested; and »how the alternative means for compliance meet the intent and goals of the requested standard exemption, or how the alterna- tive proposes to maintain a similar level of effort by exceeding other site and building standards . The Director may approve, or recommend approval of, design standard exceptions when the overall design, as proposed by the applicant, meets or exceeds the intent of the City of Meridian Archi- tectural Standards Manual and the applicable requirements of the Unified Development Code and is not detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare . Requests for design standard exceptions are subject to the process, findings and/or fees contained in Chapter 5, Article B, of the Unified Development Code . Manual Structure standards sections The Manual contains two main sections, one each for non-residential and residential development . The Non-Residential section contains policy statements and standards that include: Cohesive Design, Build- ing Scale, Building Form, Architectural Elements, Materials, and Signs & Lighting . The Residential section contains policy statements and standards that include: Cohesive Design, Build- ing Form, Architectural Elements, and Lighting . tables The Architectural Standards Manual contains tables that include intent, goal and standard statements . These tables are grouped into the two sections listed above: Non-Residential and Residential . aPPendices The appendices in this Manual include definitions, and an index of terminology and correlating photo examples . additional Material In addition to this Manual and its appendices, addi- tional material are available on the City’s website, including standards checklists that are specific to each sub-category type (e .g . – Commercial Districts, Industrial Districts, etc .) . For questions: Contact the Planning Division at 208 .884 .5533 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | In t r o d u c t i o n AA-5 BHow to Use this DocumentSeCtion B DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Ho w t o U s e t h i s D o c u m e n t BB-1 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW How To Use This Document Determining Applicable Standards 1. Identify Section (type of structure): This Architectural Standards Manual is broken into two distinct sections, Non-Residential and Residential . You’ll need to know what type of structure you’re developing for the next step . 2. Identify Sub-category: Sub-categories of a section (residential or non-residential) are based on zoning designations. Use the matrix below to determine specific application of standards, based on the type of structure (section) and zoning designation (sub-category) . Your sub- category will either be “CD”, “TND”, “IND”, “MF”, or “SF” (see table below for description and references to definitions). Integrated structures with both residential and non-residential uses may fall into either section, depending on the property zoning designation . Residential structures fall into single-family or multi-family sub-categories as defined by the City of Meridian Unified Development Code. R- 2 R- 4 R- 8 R - 1 5 R- 4 0 TN - R TN - C O - T C- N C- C C- G L- O M- E H- E I- L I- H Sub-categories Non-Residential Section Non-residential --CD CD CD TND TND TND CD CD CD CD CD CD IND IND Integrated ----TND TND TND TND -------- Residential Section Multi-family --MF MF MF MF TND TND -MF MF ----- Single-family*SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF -------- SF=Single-family Residential, MF=Multi-family Residential, TND= Traditional Neighborhood Districts, CD=Commercial Districts, and IND=Industrial Districts. For single-family and multi-family definitions, see Title 11 Chapter 1 Article A of the City of Meridian Unified Development Code. *Not all detached single-family homes are subject to Design Review. Please refer to the UDC and the entitlement for the property when determining if Design Review is required. 3. Review Standards Tables: The District Sub-category identified above will be used to identify applicable standards in this Manual . The following page includes an overview of how to use the standards tables . See table to the right for sub-category page numbers . 1. identiFy section (building tyPe) 2. identiFy sub-category (zoning) 3. review standards tables ■Non-residential: Section C Pg. Commercial CD C-3 Traditional TND C-3 Industrial IND C-3 ■Residential: Section D Pg. Multi-family MF D-3 Single-family SF D-3 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Ho w t o U s e t h i s D o c u m e n t BB-3 Standards Tables Standards are categorized by their basic building type and sub-category . Some standards may also have other more specific application conditions, indicated in the text. For how to determine sub-category applicability, see the previous page . Each table within the Manual has several consistent features, including: 1 .) iden- tification (ID #); 2.) Description; 3.) Sub-categories indicator; and 4.) Reference indicator . See below for an example . exaMPle standards table ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND A.BC This is an example of an architectural standard in the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual. The “Ref.” column to the right will sometimes be populated with a letter, which is a reference to a picture with the same indicated letter. Z ●●○ DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW 4. reFerence iMages The City of Meridian Architectural Standards make use of images to provide relevant design examples . These images may either be photos or drawings . Each image is generally referenced within a standards table, if adjacent to a table, indicated by a small lettered symbol . These letters are specific to and start over in new sub-sections (e .g . - Cohesive Design) . 1. identiFication nuMbers The Standards Tables are organized in a hierarchy starting with the Intent, followed by Goals, and ending in Standards . In the above example, “A” references the Intent of a section; B references the goal(s) under an intent; and “C ” references specific standards under a goal. For example, 3.2C, would indicate Intent #3, Goal #2 and standard C. 2. descriPtion Each description for an Intent, Goal, or Standard provides directive text . Intent statements are high level and inter- pretive. Goals provide more specific direction but are still conceptual . Standards are intended to be measurable or specific, such as yes or no.3. section sub-categories The columns to the right of the reference column (Ref .) indicate whether standards are applicable to sub-categories of a section . If there is an: “●“ , the text applies to the sub-category “○”, the text does not apply to the sub-categoryGoalIntentStandardWhat do the table icons mean? Z Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Ho w t o U s e t h i s D o c u m e n t BB-4 CNon-Residential StandardsSeCtion C DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-1 Non-Residential Standards The following section of standards are applicable to non-residential development as defined by the City of Meridian Unified Development Code, as outlined in this Manual (see the How To Use This Document section), applicable Development Agreements, or as directed by City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Design Review Committee . Cohesive Design The Cohesive Design group of standards are applicable to all non-residential and even some residential development. See the How to Use This Document section for more information on applicability of standards . cohesive design, non-residenetial standards (cds) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Intent 1.00 Promote visually aesthetic building designs that incorporate quality architectural characteristics and establish built envi- ronments that are compatible with existing, planned, and anticipated adjacent land uses. ●●● Goal 1.10 Articulate building designs to frame and accentuate public spaces with pedestrian scale elements and details.●●● Goal 1.11 Building design should address building scale, mass, form, and use a variety of materials and architectural features to ensure an aesthetic contribution compatible with surrounding buildings. A ●●● 1.1A Maintain consistent and contiguous pedestrian environments across developments. Limit circuitous connections and maintain clear visibility. B ●●● 1.1B Provide pedestrian connections to non-private public spaces.●●○ 1.1C Incorporate architectural features on all sides of a building façade facing: the primary entrance(s) of an adjacent building, public roadways, interior site amenities, and façades that are visible from public spaces. See Architectural Elements, Building Form, and Materials sections. C ●●○ 1.1D Buildings must orient, frame, and/or direct pedestrian views to adjacent cultural buildings, parks, and plazas.●●○ »Variety of materials, architectural elements, and integration with pedestrian environment. »Continuous and articulated pedestrian environment across multiple tenant spaces and a drive-through. »All public facing sides of buildings include some level of interesting architecture. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, TND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-3 cohesive design, non-residenetial standards (cds) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND 1.1E Design and orient buildings not to impede access. The building should enhance the appeal of open space and pedestrian environments ●●○ Goal 1.20 Design building façades to express architectural character and incorporate the use of design principles to unify developments and buildings, and relate to adjacent and surrounding uses. D ●●● 1.2A Comply and adhere with all previously required building design elements that were included as part of a Development Agreement, Conditional Use Permit, and/or other requirements as part of prior approval. ●●● 1.2B New construction must share at least three similar accent materials, field materials, or other architectural feature of a building within 150-feet of the property. Similar materials must be the same basic group, such as masonry, stone, or stucco, but do not need to be the same color, brand, or style. Compliance with any streetscape provisions, such as historic lighting and furniture, count as one item towards this require- ment. In Old Town, use of brick masonry as a field or accent material may count towards this requirement. ○●○ Goal 1.30 Incorporate design principles to include rhythm, repetition, framing, and/or proportion. Applies to all sides of a building façade facing public roadways, that are visible from residential neighborhoods or public spaces, or facing the public entry of an adjacent building. E ●●● 1.3A Integrate at least one material change, color variation, or horizontal reveal for every 12-vertical feet of building façade; vertical spacing may be averaged over façade. F ●●● 1.3B Integrate at least one material change, color variation, or vertical reveal every 50-horizontal feet of building façade; horizontal spacing may be averaged over façade elevation. ●●● DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »Use of similar materials, shared landscape materials, and consistent lighting help to unify a variety of building designs. »Simple building design incorporates a repetition of building elements and frames the entryway facing a public roadway. »Several narrow bands of material modulation help to break up an otherwise bland expanse of material along the vertical face of building. DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND DISTRICTS: IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND D E F Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-4 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »For simplicity, standards are written to capture requirements for the bulk of Design Review applications. In some cases, such as this industrial building within a commercial zoning district, and part of a larger mixed use development, there may be opportunities to meet the intent and goals through design standard exceptions. While the building in this picture lacks significant modulation along a stretch of the façade facing an arterial roadway (it does modulate elsewhere), it still meets requirements for overall modulation. The site also exceeds requirements for tree plantings, with a large number of additional trees planted near the face of the building, providing texture, depth, and interest. Some of the other added improvements with this industrial building include: {A} cultured stone panels; {B} extended eaves with accent materials; {C} exceeds material and color requirements; {D} glazing above the first floor (which also exceeds requirements); {E} wide sidewalks integrated throughout the site and connecting to site amenities; and {F} mature trees near the face of the building. This structure also relates to and compliments other office buildings on the campus, which also exceed site, landscape, and architectural requirements. DISTRICTS: CD, INDG Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-5 C E A D F B DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »Unifying architectural element at an entryway to the Silverado business park. Stone and arches are prominent features for many of the buildings. »A variety of horizontal and vertical material changes, reveals, fenestration, and architectural canopies create interest in the building designs from all public views. »A variety of colors and finish materials are used within this cluster of multi-tenant buildings off of Overland Road, but all share basic architectural design and field materials. »Unifying architectural element within an area of the El Dorado business park, that shares architectural elements with surrounding buildings. DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND H I J K Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-6 Building Scale The Building Scale group of standards are applicable to all non-residential and even some resi- dential development. See the “How to Use This Document” chapter for more information on applicability of standards . building scale, non-residenetial standards (bss) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Intent 2.00 Promote building designs that use appropriate architectural and pedestrian scales to establish compatible physical and visual relationships with adjacent and surrounding developments and reinforce a cohesive built environment. A ●●● Goal 2.10 Development should consider the scale of surrounding build- ings, including relationships to existing residential areas, as well as an appropriate height, mass, and form scaled for the built environment. Applies to façades of development along public roads, public spaces, and adjacent to residential areas. ●●● 2.1A Buildings with rooflines 50-feet in length or greater must incorporate roofline and parapet variations. Variations may include step-downs, step-backs, other modulation, or architectural features such as cornices, ledges, or columns, and must occur in total combination for at least 20% of the façade length. May be averaged over entire façade, but may not exceed 75-feet without a break. B ●●● 2.1B For buildings with façades longer than 200-feet, reduce mass- ing of buildings by grouping or incorporating smaller tenant spaces along the commercial façade, or by incorporating at least one significant modulation with depth at least 3% of the total façade length or 10-feet, and a width in combination at least 20% of the façade length. C ●●○ 2.1C Within Old Town, building designs must provide a building scale of two or more stories at least 25-feet in height along roadways. ○●○ 2.1D Within mixed use areas and for all developments along arterial roadways, buildings over 1,000 sqft must provide a minimum 20-foot building elevation to include average parapet height, ridge of a pitched roof, or tower/turret type elements at least 20% in total of overall façade width. ●●● »A variety of street, automotive, and pedestrian scale features are used to integrate this building into the surrounding environment. »The building parapet integrates a variety of step-downs, modulation, and material changes to create interest. »Fred Meyer grocery store integrates and modulates a variety of smaller complimentary uses into the building frontage. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-7 building scale, non-residenetial standards (bss) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Goal 2.20 Physically configure building designs to reduce disproportioned architectural scale relative to adjacent uses. Applies to façades of development along public roads, public spaces, and residential areas. D ●●○ 2.2A For adjacent buildings with greater than 1-story height dispar- ity (i.e. – two or more stories difference) and within 30-feet of each other, integrate and align parapet designs, material changes, fenestration alignment, material reveals, or other architectural elements and horizontal articulation, to relate varying building heights to one another. Aligned features do not have to be the same type (i.e. window pattern on one could align with parapet on another). ●●○ 2.2B Use pedestrian scale and landscape design elements such as specialty lighting, awnings, trees or other site elements to visually relate and transition multi-story buildings (or equivalent) to the ground plane. E ●●○ Goal 2.30 Incorporate pedestrian-scale architectural features to support an aesthetic character that contributes to the quality of the building design and connectivity with the surrounding environ- ment. Applies to façades in developments: visible from arterial or collector roadways, adjacent to residential developments facing roadways, facing an adjacent building's primary building entries, and adjacent to public spaces. F ●●● 2.3A Consistently incorporate at least two (2) architectural features into the building design that are pedestrian scale, to include: fenestration patterns; architectural elements such as ledges, lighting, or canopies; material or pattern banding; or detailing (see Pedestrian Scale definition). ●●● »Raised planters, trees, and awnings help to integrate the design of an arterial roadway scaled building to the pedestrian space adjacent to it. »Varying parapet heights help to transition taller focal elements and relate the buildings to one another. »Windows, architectural canopies with supports, and landscaping up close to the building each lend themselves to improving a sense of pedestrian scale. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND E D F Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-8 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »This multi-story building despite being industrial, includes a number of attractive design features to maintain a pedestrian scale environment on the public oriented side of the structure. Some of these elements include: {A} consistent landscaping along the edge of the building; {B} organized fenestration along customer and public entries; exceeds and {C} architectural canopies using thematic materials the company sells. Other architectural elements contributing to a cohesive building design include: {D} windows with attractive and complimentary materials; {E} secondary architectural canopies above top-level windows; {F} consistent use of material caps, both on textured block and stucco; and {G} clean, organized reveals in the stucco correlating with other architectural elements. DISTRICTS: INDG Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-9 C E B A F F D G building scale, non-residenetial standards (bss) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Goal 2.40 Along local or collector roadways and within Traditional Neighbor- hood Districts, maintain relative consistency of building scales along roadways and blocks to promote the development of cohesive urban areas. ○●○ 2.4A For buildings fronting local and collector roadways, off-street parking must be located to the side of or behind buildings; off-street parking is not allowed between the roadway and building. H ○●○ 2.4B Limit building separation from the roadway to streetscape and pedestrian supportive use areas, such as locations for street furnishings, outdoor dining, small plazas, public spaces, or storefronts. I ○●○ »Buildings brought up close to local and collector roads or drive lanes, in coordination with appropriate streetscape elements, help to enhance pedestrian scale. »The buildings here are brought up close to the street and off-street parking is located behind the buildings. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, TND DISTRICTS: CD, TND I H Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-10 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »Landscape design, including trees and shrubs, specialty lighting, patio furniture, and unique entryway design features help to emphasize pedestrian scale on an automotive scaled building along an arterial roadway. »Arbors with strong architectural character and landscaping up close to the building help to emphasize pedestrian scale. »A number of interesting architectural features including modulation, varying building heights, architectural canopies, material patterns designed to lead the eye, and strong landscape elements help to maintain a pedestrian scale and emphasize the entries. »A variety of landscape elements spaced appropriately from the face of an industrial looking building, help to transition an imposing building scale to the pedestrian realm near the entry. DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND J K L M Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-11 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »Unique entryway features, covered parking, raised planters, and a variety of landscape materials help to transition and emphasize the pedestrian realm on an otherwise imposing multi-story structure. More specifically, the building includes the following: {A} raised landscape planter with seating, low trimmed shrubs, and mature trees help frame the grand entry, while also providing transition to a welcoming pedestrian scale; {B} large wood beams, oversized hardware, and unique roof forms in concert with modulation help to emphasize the entry in coordination with landscaping; {C} unique materials in conjunction with additional raised planters, landscaping, and covered parking help to transition the building scale to the pedestrian realm; {D} accent bands with color and texture variation help to create interest at all building elevations; {E} vertical landscape elements near to the façade help to quickly transition the building to a comfortable pedestrian scale along the sidewalk; and {F} modulation in coordination with material changes help to transition and accent building form. DISTRICTS: CD, INDN Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-12 C A E B F F D Building Form The Building Form group of standards are applicable to all non-residential and even some resi- dential development. See the “How to Use This Document” chapter for more information on applicability of standards . building ForM, non-residenetial standards (bFs) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Intent 3.00 Promote building designs that articulate and define appropriate building forms with visual interest and enhance the character of the built environment. ●●● Goal 3.10 Articulate building forms, including but not limited to massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of aesthetic building designs. Applies to façades in developments: along arterial and col- lector roadways, adjacent to residential developments facing roadways, facing public entries of adjacent buildings, and visible from public spaces. A ●●● 3.1A Incorporate at least one type of the following modulations in the façade plane, including but not limited to: projections, recesses, and step backs that articulate wall planes and break up building mass. Examples include but are not limited to columns with trim or accent materials, change in finished material depths, building overhangs, and inset features and materials such as false windows or fenestration with architectural accents. B ●●● 3.1B Qualifying modulation must be at least 6-inches in depth, be at least 8-inches in width or height (whichever is narrowest), and occur in total for 20% of overall façade elevation. For buildings with façades less than 150-feet, horizontal modulation must occur no less than every 30-feet. For buildings with façades greater than or equal to 150-feet, horizontal modulation must occur no less than every 50-feet. C ●●● 3.1C Design parking structure façades as site integrated buildings, meeting applicable Manual standards for Architectural Ele- ments and Material sections. ●●○ »Covered entries are integrated into the building design for each tenant space, providing modulation, weather protection, and help in emphasizing entry locations. »Façade projection helps to add significance to the public entryway, while also providing modulation, varying material colors, and weather protection. »Building modulation, along with a unique architectural canopy, material banding, and fenestration help to signify the public entrance. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-13 building ForM, non-residenetial standards (bFs) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Goal 3.20 Incorporate visual and physical distinctions in the building design that enhance building forms, articulate façades, identify entries, integrate pedestrian scale, and visually anchor the building to the ground or street level. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public space, and to façades with public entries. D ●●● 3.2A For at least 30% of applicable façades use any combination of concrete, masonry, stone, or unique variation of color, texture, or material, at least 10-inches in height, around the base of the building. May alternatively incorporate other architectural features such as ledges, façade reveals, ground level fenestration, raised planters, or landscaping elements within 3-feet of finished grade. E F ●●● 3.2B Where building designs incorporate multiple stories, or multiple floor height equivalents, integrate at least one field or accent color, material, or architectural feature used on lower stories, on the upper stories. ●●● 3.2C Building designs with multiple stories must provide pro- portionally taller ground-level façades adjacent to public roadways and public spaces. Provide floor-to-ceiling heights, or floor-to-floor from 10 to 16 feet. ●●● 3.2D In mixed-use areas and for structures greater than four stories, design the uppermost story or façade wall plane to include material changes, horizontal articulation, and modulation meeting first story requirements, or include a patio, rooftop garden, penthouse, or strong architectural feature such as a tower element. ●●○ Goal 3.30 Building design should establish visual connections that relate internal spaces at ground- or street-level with facades adjacent to public roadways, public spaces, and along primary building entries, and that add visual interest and complexity to the first floor building design. ●●● 3.3A Use horizontal and/or vertical divisions in wall planes, such as ledges, awnings, recesses, stringcourse, molding, joint lines, or other material types, to frame and accent 30% or more of total fenestration. ●●● »Facade modulation and incorporation of a vestibule, multiple roof types, and integration with a unique sign help to highlight the public building entry, without use of canopies. »Material banding around the base of the building, along with ledges, fenestration patterns, and landscaping, help to ground the building design and incorporate pedestrian scale. »Fenestration at finished grade and landscape design help to ground the building and incorporate pedestrian scale, without material banding near the bottom. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND D E F Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-14 building ForM, non-residenetial standards (bFs) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND 3.3B Within Old Town, average 50% fenestration along first floor façade facing roadways and public spaces. May also meet fenestration alternative for up to half of required area. Buildings with façades fronting multiple streets may meet Fenestration Alternative for other façades (see 3.3E). ○●○ 3.3C Within mixed-use areas, average 40% fenestration along applicable first floor façade. May also meet fenestration alternative at 40% (see 3.3E). For façades facing roadways that are not public entryways, may meet Fenestration Alternative (see 3.3E). Big box may limit applicable façade area to 30-feet around public pedestrian entries. ○●○ 3.3D Average 30% fenestration for applicable first floor façade, unless specified elsewhere. May also meet fenestration alternative (see 3.3E). Big box and buildings in industrial districts may limit applicable façade area to 30-feet around public entries. G H ●○● 3.3E Fenestration Alternative: Incorporate doors and windows for at least 30% of applicable first floor façade, or suggest their inclusion using faux treatments that incorporate at least two of the following: material changes, reveals in conjunction with color or material change, qualifying modulation such as recessed areas, architectural trellis, awnings and canopies over access areas, detached structures such as pergola, or similar architectural features and details. I ●●● »Vivid copper colored framing, detailed columns, reveal patterns, and canopies help to frame and accent fenestration. »Fenestration is an important building element and except for very unique conditions, should be integral to the design. »Fenestration may not always be practical on required façades, in which case hinting their inclusion with faux elements such as canopies and unique materials can be beneficial. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND G H I Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-15 building ForM, non-residenetial standards (bFs) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Goal 3.40 Building roof types, forms, and elements should provide variation and interest to building profiles and contribute to the architectural identity of the buildings, without creating an imposing scale on adjacent uses. Applies to façades: in development along arterial roadways, visible from residential development, adjacent to public spaces, facing public entries of adjacent buildings. ●●● 3.4A For flat roofs, incorporate primary and secondary roof ele- ments including but not limited to: multiple material types along parapets, multiple parapet elevations with at least 1-foot change in elevation, or modulation of at least 2-feet in the parapet, such as along entryway overhangs. Qualifying elements must exist for at least 20% the length of applicable façades. May also incorporate secondary roof types, such as hip roofs along overhangs. J ●●● 3.4B For sloped roofs, incorporate at least two of any one roof element, including but not limited to: valleys, ridges, or gables. Qualifying elements in total must exist for at least 20% of applicable façade roof area and be visible from the same façade elevation. May also incorporate other roof styles, such as parapet walls over entryway features. K ●●● 3.4C Provide variation in roof profile over façade modulation and/ or articulation over façade material/color transitions. Options include, but are not limited to: varying parapet heights; two or more roof planes; continuation of façade modulation through roof lines; dormers; lookouts; overhang eaves; sloped roofs; or cornice work. L ●●○ »Varying parapet heights with a variety of materials and details are integral to a complete building design. »A variety of roof planes help to transition and integrate other materials, modulation, and reinforce points of interest. »Coinciding modulation with variation in the roof profile helps to articulate and correlate important elements of the building design, such building entries. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND J K L Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-16 Architectural Elements The Architectural Elements group of standards are applicable to all non-residential and even some residential development. See the “How to Use This Document” chapter for more informa- tion on applicability of standards . architectural eleMents, non-residenetial standards (aes) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Intent 4.00 Promote integrated architectural elements and details as components of cohesive building designs that enhance the visual interest of building façades, support activity at and/or near ground level, and provide pedestrian scale. ●●● Goal 4.10 Use proportional architectural elements and detailing to articu- late façades, and contribute to an aesthetic building character with a high level of pedestrian design. Applies to façades: in development along public roadways, visible from residential development, adjacent to public spaces, facing public entries of adjacent buildings. ●●● Goal 4.11 Design and articulate architectural elements using proportions, divisions, detailing, materials, textures, and colors and appropri- ately integrate these elements into the building design. Applies to façades: in development along public roadways, visible from residential development, adjacent to public spaces, facing public entries of adjacent buildings. A ●●● 4.1A Provide at least three detailing elements that transition façade material changes or integrate pedestrian scale elements, such as doorways, windows, or material banding, at the base of the building. Examples include but are not limited to: cornice work around primary entries, decorative caps on brick or stone banding, architectural canopies over entries, or decorative lintels above the first floor windows. B ●●○ 4.1B Provide building overhangs or other projections such as canopies which articulate the building façade and provide temporary relief from inclement weather. At a minimum, an overhang or projection is required within 20-feet of all public entryways, must be at least 3-feet in depth from the point of entry, and be least 6-feet in length. Entryways with vestibules or other permanent enclosed transition space are exempt. C ●●● »Relatively simple materials and thoughtful accents can be used to create interest and integrate design elements throughout the building. »Specialty lighting, trellis, material banding, raised planters, and similar type improvements can all help to reinforce a comfortable pedestrian environment adjacent to large buildings. »Architectural canopies can provide a number of benefits, including supporting the building design, reinforcing pedestrian scale details, and providing weather protection. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-17 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »This building is well grounded, with integration of both building form and accent color in the landscape, and conversely landscape materials that emphasize building form, such as the upright stone outcropping. »The tower element drive-through canopy not only helps to generate awareness of the building, but also creates interest in the building form and establishes the building as an integrated part of the site. Added fenestration and use of thematic and complimentary service equipment help to enhance the building. »Relating building form to landscape elements help to create complexity and interest in the design. In this case, a fenced outdoor sales area is integrated into the building design using colored and textured CMU columns, to match elements of the building design. »In some cases, building form and modulation of the facade can be false, creating the illusion of more substantial elements without complicating the design. In this industrial example, concrete buttresses are used in conjunction with metal awnings to frame fenestration, landscaping, and entries. DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND D E F G Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-18 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »This entryway is emphasized with a number of attractive architectural elements that transition this 3-story building to pedestrian scale. Some of these elements include: {A} decorative railing over second-story modulation of the façade, that also works to transition the building scale; {B} oversized eaves with unique accent materials; {C} a large architectural canopy to emphasize the entrance, provide weather protection, and to further transition the building elevation to a pedestrian scale; {D} unique landscape materials to accentuate the entrance; and {E} landscape materials in coordination with finished grade fenestration along the building edge, to integrate the building into the overall site and anchor the building. DISTRICTS: CD,INDH Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-19 B C A A E D architectural eleMents, non-residenetial standards (aes) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND 4.1C Provide details that emphasize focal elements such as public entries, building corners, or public spaces. Examples include but are not limited to: columns, quoin or rustication, canopies over entries, lintels, transom windows, or modulation of the roof plane. At least one focal element is required and must be accented with a unique combination of color, texture, materials, or modulation in the wall or roof plane. I ●●○ Goal 4.20 Building designs must not create blank wall segments when visible from a public street or public spaces. Consider the treatment at the base, middle, and top of the façade. ●●● 4.2A Use any combination of standards from Building Form, Architectural Elements, or Material sections to provide pattern, color, or material variation on all wall segments. Must not exceed 30-feet horizontally or vertically without building variation. ●●● Goal 4.30 Organize building service equipment, including, but not limited to, utility, service, and mechanical, away from building entries, roadways, public spaces, and, where appropriate, from adjacent buildings. ●●● 4.3A Use and integrate standards from the Architectural Standards Manual to screen and conceal service and mechanical equip- ment. Landscaping meeting the same intent may also be considered for utility meters and connections. ●●● 4.3B All ground level mechanical equipment must be screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property line.J ●●● 4.3C All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened as viewed from the farthest edge of the adjoining right of way.K ●●● »A clock tower and vestibule on a rotated axis, coordinated awning, and a variety of materials and details all help to identify and direct focus to the public entryway. »Walls and landscape material which relate to the overall building designs are appropriate methods for screening ground level utility connections and mechanical equipment. »Mechanical equipment on this building is screened with landscaping, with a parapet, and with additional roof-top screens placed around roof-top equipment (not visible from this perspective). DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND I J K Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-20 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »A curvilinear canopy and columns on an otherwise angular building footprint, help to reinforce and draw attention to the public entryway. Vivid colors and additional glazing to help frame the doorways, further emphasize this space. »Small touches like ledges, reveal patterns, transom lighting, and landscaping can create unique interest out of otherwise commonplace materials. »Distinct pattern reveal lines in conjunction with color, landscape, and fenestration create interest, despite limited use of unique construction materials. »Color banding, extra fenestration, architectural canopies, facade modulation, and simple geometric forms create building interest despite limited use of unique construction materials. DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: IND DISTRICTS: IND L M N O Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-21 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »This large building, part of a multi-tenant big box development, includes a number of unique building scale, architectural elements, and attractive materials that help to maintain a relevant pedestrian scale, despite building features designed to be visible from an arterial roadway, more than 600-feet to the west. Some of the building elements working to create this cohesive building design include: {A} an array of complimentary building materials such as brick, stucco, engineered bamboo, and steel, with details such as reveals and cornice pieces; {B} attractive large framed metal awnings over windows and entries; {C} specialty lighting to emphasize the entrance and support pedestrian scale; {D} accent lighting to emphasize building elements; and {E} landscaping including trees in raised planters, up close to the building, to enhance and frame building elements, and reinforce pedestrian scale. DISTRICTS: CD, INDP Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-22 B C D A E Materials The Materials group of standards are applicable to all non-residential and even some residential development. See the “How to Use This Document” chapter for more information on applicabil- ity of standards . Materials, non-residenetial standards (Mas) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Intent 5.00 Use quality materials and colors that promote aesthetic build- ing designs and contribute to the development of a timeless community character. ●●● Goal 5.10 Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design. Use materials from the following basic groups: wood, masonry, concrete, stucco, metal, and glazing. ●●● 5.1A For buildings with façades that face multiple public roadways and/or public spaces, use consistent material combinations, material quality, and architectural detailing. A ●●● 5.1B For all façade elevations visible from public roads, public spaces, primary entrance(s) of an adjacent building, and facing residential districts, use at least two distinct field materials, colors, or material-color combinations on the building façade (see also Material definitions). ●●○ 5.1C For all façade elevations in industrial districts along arterial and collector roads or facing public spaces, use at least two distinct field materials, colors, or material-color combinations on the building façade (see also Material definitions). ○○● 5.1D For façade elevations visible from public roadways and along primary building entryways, incorporate an accent material on the first story. B ●●● 5.1E Distinguish field materials from accent materials through pattern, texture, or additional detail visible from edge of nearest roadway. Alternate masonry or material courses with relief from primary plane may count toward this. ●●● 5.1F Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. For example, wrap stone or stone-like products around visible corners to convey the appearance of mass, and not as a thin veneer. C ●●● »Surrounded by roadways or public entries, this building incorporates some level of consistent material variation, accents, and facade modulation on all sides. »This building incorporates a number of accent materials on all required sides, including: decorative stone, lintels, unique materials at points of interest, and landscape material. »Decorative stone and other materials affixed to the building face should transition around modulation and building corners, appearing integral to the building design. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-23 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »Minor material details through reveals and color changes, in coordination with other architectural elements such as canopies, can have a big impact on the overall design. »Façade materials should always transition around outside angles, but going a step further and providing the same detail underneath or behind, or with accent materials such as the brick in this image, provides a robust design that enhances not just the view from a vehicle orientation, but a pedestrian up close. »Full depth masonry is used to provide façade modulation, and in coordination with several types of windows and awnings, creates a focal point adjacent to several types of banded CMU patterning. »A variety of metal paneling materials may be appropriate as field materials in some districts, when used in coordination with other qualifying field materials, such as masonry products. DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND D E F G Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-24 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »This industrial technology building uses a variety of relatively stark building materials and colors in combination with sharp intersections of building forms, to create a complex and detailed building design. Points of interest are signified by intersections of building form, modulation, and material changes, and accented by fenestration and landscape elements. Some of these elements include: {A} columnar trees and specimen planting to coincide with material banding; {B} sharp contrast of building material types and colors to emphasize focal elements; {C} often competing, horizontal and vertical patterns maintain clear continuation through material and building modulation; {D} large areas of flat color are accented with reveals that maintain horizontal banding leading to changes in building modulation and form; and {E} accent materials that coincide with fenestration to create cohesive vertical banding elements. DISTRICTS: CD,INDH Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-25 C E D A B Materials, non-residenetial standards (Mas) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND 5.1G Non-durable materials, treatments, and finishes that deteriorate quickly with weather, ultra-violet light, and that are more susceptible to wear and tear are prohibited on permanent structures. ●●● 5.1H The use of vinyl and ordinary smooth face block, unfinished, colored, or painted, are prohibited as a field materials for building façades along public roadways, adjacent to public spaces, and when visible from residential neighborhoods. Smooth face block may be used as an accent material. ○○● 5.1I Untextured concrete panels and prefabricated steel panels are prohibited as field materials for building façades, except when used with a minimum of two other qualifying field materials and meeting all other standard fenestration and material requirements. I ●●● 5.1J In Industrial Districts, untextured concrete panels and prefab- ricated steel panels are prohibited as facade field materials facing arterial and collector roadways, or public spaces, except when used with a minimum of two other qualifying field materials and meeting standard fenestration requirements. Concrete panels that do not exceed three (3) SQFT without a patterned reveal or modulation break may be considered textured. J ●●○ Goal 5.20 Use colors that complement building materials and support innovative and good design practices. Applies to building façades visible from a public street, public spaces, and pedestrian environments. K ●●● 5.2A Use of subtle, neutral, or natural tones must be integrated with at least one accent or field material.●●● 5.2B Use of intensely saturated colors or fluorescence is prohibited as a primary material. May be used as an accent material.●●● 5.2C Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as some metals or reflective glazing, must not redirect light towards roadways, public spaces, or adjacent uses in a way which constitutes a public nuisance or safety hazard. ●●● »In commercial districts, concrete panels are a permitted field material type, in conjunction with other field materials, in this example utilizing brick and additional fenestration. »Within industrial districts, a variety of attractive colors, reveals, accents, and meeting all other standards, the use of untextured concrete panels may be permitted. »Natural tones in this building are complimented through accent materials such as architectural canopies and multiple types of clear and translucent glass. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND I J K Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-26 Materials, non-residenetial standards (Mas) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Goal 5.30 Integrate roll-up doors, will-call doors, drive-through doors, and loading docks into the building design, and locate them in a manner which does not create pedestrian, drive aisle, or roadway conflicts. Applies to façades along arterial and collector roadways, and façades facing public spaces. ●●● 5.3A For commercial and traditional neighborhood districts, roll-up and drive-through doors are allowed when integrated into the building design, but will-call doors with roll-ups and loading docks are prohibited. Consider material variation and transitions, modulation, and other architectural features and standards for the design. L ●●○ 5.3B For industrial district properties, will-call and roll-up doors are allowed when integrated into the building design, but loading docks are prohibited. Consider material variation, transitions, modulation, and other architectural features and standards for the design. M ○○● DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »[Placeholder image from Google Maps] Roll-up door integrated into the commercial building design. »In Industrial districts facing arterial and collector roadways, loading docks must be located to the sides or rear or the building, but will-call doors and roll-ups may be located in the front. DISTRICTS: CD DISTRICTS: IND L M Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-27 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »Materials wrap around corners, are accented with banding and other architectural materials, and modulation in the facade coincides with changes in parapet heights, materials, and accents. »This building which is otherwise a box, uses insets at the corners to frame and accent fenestration, and to provide required modulation facing public roadways. Textured concrete, mirrored glass, and reveals provide necessary material and accent variations. »Masonry can integrate alternate rows and courses to provide required accents and variation, without actually using another material. »Materials transition across and wrap around modulation, and use decorative accents such as stone caps. DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND DISTRICTS: IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND N O P Q Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-28 Signs & Lighting The Signs & Lighting group of standards are applicable to all non-residential and even some residential development. See the “How to Use This Document” chapter for more information on applicability of standards . signs & lighting, non-residenetial standards (sls) ID #Description Ref.CD TND IND Intent 6.00 Integrate signs and architectural lighting as cohesive elements of building designs that contribute to the atmosphere of the built environment and enhance safety. ●●● Goal 6.10 Use lighting on building exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environments along roadways, at intersections, and in public spaces. ●●● 6.1A Lighting fixture spacing and height along streetscapes and roadways must be placed to avoid conflicts with tree plantings.●●● 6.1B Use energy-efficient architectural lighting.●●● 6.1C Use lighting fixtures that are consistent with other decorative hardware on the building. For example, select lighting hardware with similar color and shape as other building hardware, use recessed lighting, incorporate uniform spacing, integrate with other accents and reveals, and coordinate specialty lights with predominate architectural features. A B ●●● Goal 6.20 Signs should be integrated with architectural features and complement the building design and materials. Relate the size, shape, materials, details, and illumination to a pedestrian scale in mixed-use environments. See City of Meridian Unified Development Code for other sign requirements. ○●○ 6.2A Within traditional neighborhood districts, integrate hanging or projecting signs in pedestrian oriented areas.C ○●○ 6.2B Use signs that are proportional to the mounted and visible building façade plane. Provide modulation, material variations, or integrate architectural features to accentuate and frame signs that are not hanging or projecting. ○●○ 6.2C Use sign types such as, wall, window, door, awning, hanging, and projecting, to enhance urban character. Non-portable freestanding, box, and pole signs are not allowed. ○●○ »Specialty lighting that compliments other building hardware such as canopies or storefront window framing, can help to unify the building design and reinforce points of interest. »Integrating accent and pedestrian lighting can be as simple as selecting hardware with a similar color. »Within an urban area, with the building façades up close to the street, projecting and hanging signs can improve visibility and awareness for both pedestrians and motorists. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-29 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »Complimenting the building design doesn’t necessarily mean sharing the same thematic elements. In this example, new and old are blended through modern design features of this specialty lighting, to relate with architectural features on the adjacent building. »By using several types of specialty lighting, focal elements of the building design can be enhanced day or night, by the size, style, and color of the lamp, housing, and/or complete luminaire. »Using attractive site lighting can help to emphasize a development and establish a cohesive design thematic even when individual buildings may vary dramatically. »Signs and wayfinding should work to help establish and enhance the design and thematic of the primary structure. DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND DISTRICTS: CD, TND, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND DISTRICTS: CD, IND D E F G Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s CC-30 DResidential StandardsSeCtion D DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-1 Residential Standards The following section of standards are applicable to residential development as defined by the City of Meridian Unified Development Code, as outlined in this Manual (see the How To Use This Document section), applicable Development Agreements, or as directed by City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Design Review Committee . Cohesive Design Residential The Cohesive Design Residential group of standards are applicable to residential development . See the How to Use This Document section for more information on applicability of standards. cohesive design, residential standards (cdrs) ID #Description Ref.SF MF Intent R1.00 Promote visually aesthetic building designs that incorporate quality architectural characteristics and establish built environments that are compatible with existing, planned, and anticipated adjacent land uses. ●● Goal R1.10 Articulate building designs to frame and accentuate public spaces with pedestrian scale elements and details.●● R1.1A Maintain consistent and contiguous pedestrian environments across developments. Limit circuitous connections and maintain clear visibility. A ○● R1.1B Provide pedestrian connections to public spaces.B ○● R1.1C Buildings must orient, frame, and/or direct pedestrian views to adjacent cultural buildings, parks, and plazas.C ○● R1.1D Design and orient buildings not to impede access. The building should enhance the appeal of open space and pedestrian environments ○● R1.1E Incorporate architectural features on all sides of a building façade facing: the primary entrance(s) of an adjacent building, public roadways, interior site amenities, and façades that are visible from public spaces. See Architectural Elements, Building Form, and Materials sections. ●● »Amenities such as pools, clubhouses, playgrounds, and centralized open space should be connected with a robust sidewalk and pathway network. »Pedestrian connections should be made to and from public spaces and nearby services, such as parks and neighborhood commercial. »Use building placement, orientation, and architecture to frame, accentuate, and provide access to site amenities and public spaces. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-3 cohesive design, residential standards (cdrs) ID #Description Ref.SF MF Goal R1.20 Within multi-family developments, enhance wayfinding and create a unique identity for each building, by incorporating complimentary variation in design. D ○● R1.2A Ensure that no two buildings viewed from a public street or public space are alike, by varying at least two of the following for each building: roof pitches, material types, color packages, structure orientation, or incorporate other unique and identifiable architectural or landscape element (such as art). E F ○● »Use building placement, orientation, materials, and colors to create easily identifiable buildings that enhance sense of place and improve wayfinding. »Within this multi-family development, housing units have a colorful array of color palettes and architectural features, helping to create unique and identifiable units. »While the color variations are subtle, each building also faces varying focal elements and site amenities from unique perspectives, improving wayfinding and enhancing sense of place. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: MF RESIDENTIAL: MF RESIDENTIAL: MF D E F Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-4 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »Multi-family residential buildings, garages, and carports all share a cohesive design using similar architecture, materials, and colors. »Site maps are an important element to help visitors and emergency responders find and locate specific units within a development. »Placing site maps near site entries and key locations such as clubhouses or property manager offices, helps to improve wayfinding for visitors and emergency responders. »Centralized amenities such as club and pool houses along with connective sidewalks and pathways help to keep a space attractive, accessible, and safe. RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: MF G H I J Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-5 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »These multi-family units while sharing similar architecture, have very unique material and color schemes. This helps individual units to be easily identifiable, increase the sense of place, and improve wayfinding. The structures also have a number of other attractive design elements including: {A} Peek-a-boo style accent windows; {B} a wide cross-section of materials and colors; {C} porch architectural accents; {D} attractive landscaping to define personal space; {E} a variety of techniques to differentiate first and second stories; and {F} pedestrian safety lighting near entries and walkways. RESIDENTIAL: MFK Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-6 A FC B E D Building Form Residential The Building Form Residential group of standards are applicable to residential development . See the “How to Use This Document” chapter for more information on applicability of standards. building ForM, residential standards (bFrs) ID #Description Ref.SF MF Intent R3.01 Emphasize architectural building forms that support compatible build- ing scales, provide appealing architectural character, and contribute to the quality of the neighborhood. ●● Goal R3.10 Articulate building forms, including, but not limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of visually aesthetic and well articulated building designs. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public spaces. A ●● R3.1A Provide a complementary and proportionate level of design and detail on all public oriented façades.●● R3.1B Incorporate at least one type of modulation in the façade plane, including, but not limited to: projections, recesses, and step backs that articulate wall planes and break up building mass. ●● R3.1C For applicable façades equal to or longer than 20-feet, provide a minimum total modulation area of 20% the horizontal wall span, with a minimum vertical height of at least 3-feet. Porches and balconies may count toward this. ●● R3.1D Modulation for qualifying projections, pop outs, bays, recesses, and varied setbacks, must be a minimum depth of 1-foot from the primary façade plane. A minimum 50% of total modulation must be visible over permanent barriers, such as berms and fencing, from described areas. B ●● R3.1E Use any combination of material type, color variation, banding, stringcourse, or modulation to clearly distinguish between the ground level and upper stories. ●● R3.1F Incorporate visually heavier and more massive elements or materials, such as stone or masonry, primarily at the base of buildings, and lighter elements and materials such as siding, above. This excludes columns, supports, modulated walls, architectural features, and roof elements. C ●● »All residential building types should include attractive forms that include modulation, a variety of roof elements, and other complimentary architectural features. »Construction efficiency is an important consideration, but some modulation in the building form is required. Modulation should be designed to create interest and emphasize focal elements. »Stone, masonry, and heavier materials or colors can help to visually anchor a structure to the ground, conveying permanence, durability, and transition the landscape to the built environment. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-7 building ForM, residential standards (bFrs) ID #Description Ref.SF MF Goal R3.20 Residential designs should articulate façades into smaller components and break up monotonous wall planes by integrating horizontal and vertical elements. ●● R3.2A Use any combination of material, color, modulation, or other articula- tion to delineate and break up wall planes greater than 20-feet by 10-feet or wall planes exceeding 200 total square feet (whichever is more stringent). Applies to public oriented building façades visible from a public street or public spaces. D ●● R3.2B Second-story residential façades may not extend to the front face of garage bays without additional façade modulation or additional material types and architectural accents. ●● R3.2C Building façades and structures, including detached garages and carports, with a projection depth towards the front property line of more than 30% the primary façade width are not allowed. ●● R3.2D Residential buildings with attached units must articulate the design to differentiate façades of individual units or groups of units. Must consistently incorporate any two of the following: modulation, material, or color variation. ●● Goal R3.30 Design accessory structures to be compatible with residential build- ings. Accessory structures include, but are not limited to, sheltered mailboxes, storage areas, maintenance and recreational facilities, detached garages and carports, and secondary dwellings. ●● R3.3A For an accessory structure, 25% or more of the roof surface area must utilize a like material or color of a primary structure, or the structure must share similar roof forms. E ●● R3.3B For an accessory structure, 25% or more of the non-roof surface area must utilize a like material of a primary structure. Carports and other post type construction are excluded if the roof material complies. ●● Goal R3.40 Modulate and articulate roof forms to create building profile interest and to reduce the appearance of building mass and scale. Applies to public oriented façades visible from a public street, public spaces, and pedestrian environments. F ●● »Material banding and molding may be appropriate options for subtly articulating large wall planes, otherwise intended to be secondary, supportive, or background elements. »Required carports for multi-family structures may use materials that are dissimilar from housing units, but must integrate similar or complimentary colors. »For multi-family units, modulation in the form of covered patios, porches, or entryway features, may be an appropriate means to create interest without complicating design. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: MF RESIDENTIAL: MF D E F Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-8 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »All sides of a residential building facing public spaces, including required open space and pathways as part of a multi-family development, should include proportionate levels of detail in their design. »Visually heavier material such as stone or masonry should generally be located or begin at the base of the building, but may continuously cover any area upwards on the façade, so long as they appropriately transition into other materials, modulation, or roof forms. »Use of columns with attached entries is a simple technique to enhance and provide the appearance of significant façade modulation, even if the actual wall modulation only has minimal depth from the primary wall plane. They may also be effective to emphasize points of interest such as entries. »Trim, lintels, ledges, and other architectural elements help to integrate the stone field material into the rest of the façade. The stone also wraps around outside corners and ends at interior angles, limiting the appearance of a thin veneer. RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF G H I J Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-9 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »This single family residential home incorporates a number of interesting façade modulations, roof forms, and correlates the two with added architectural elements and details. Some of the attractive elements include {A} use of modulation, even minor, to transition and end façade materials; {B} lintels to accentuate fenestration; {C} added detail to the rakes, accenting the gables; {D} a dormer incorporated into the roof, creating a focal point and helping to breakup an otherwise large mass; {E} a unique roof hip end and archway accents over the covered patio; {F} multiple valleys and ridges incorporated into the roof design; and {G} a number of gables correlating with facade modulation and material applications. RESIDENTIAL: SFK Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-10 G D C E A F B building ForM, residential standards (bFrs) ID #Description Ref.SF MF R3.4A Break up roof massing into primary and secondary roof elements that correspond to horizontal and vertical modulations or divisions in the façade, and denote key architectural elements, such as entries and porches. L ●● R3.4B For all public oriented façades, provide a complementary and proportionate level of roof form design and detail.M ●● R3.4C Align and correlate roof forms including elements over porches and entries, with the overall building design and use of materials. Examples include but are not limited to: continuation of roof forms with vertical elements such as columns, piers, and pilasters, or accenting gable type façades with rafters, corbels, or distinct material variations from other wall planes. ●● R3.4D Sloped roofs shall have a significant pitch, to be no less than 5/12 (22-1/2 deg).○● R3.4E Sloped roofs must extend at least 12 inches beyond the face of walls.●● R3.4F Provide variations in roof profile including but not limited at least two of the following: two or more visible roof planes; dormers, lookout, turret, or cornice work such as corbels, spaced consistently along the façade plane. N ○● »Elements of the roof design should accentuate massing and façade design, and enhance points of interest such as porches and entries. »Actual roof lines do not need to be complicated to add interest. The covered porch on this structure creates the appearance of complexity for an otherwise modular building form. »Variation in roof design does not necessarily require a variety of ridge orientations or features such as dormers, and may also be a projection of the same orientation, over modulation. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF L M N Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-11 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »Secondary structures such as detached garages need not be complex, even lacking modulation and variety in form of the primary structure, but still create interest by playing off of and complementing the primary structure through balance, symmetry, and framing design principles. »Secondary structures and features such as towers and enclosed courtyards, may be used to bring the front of the house “forward”, reducing the disproportionate distance between the garage and the front of the living area. »Entryway features such as a small covered porch, in combination with minor modulations of the building façade, creative roof forms, and attractive materials, can create a great deal of interest despite a relatively simple front façade »Secondary structures, such as enclosures for community mailboxes, should integrate a variety of architectural forms, materials, or colors from the primary residential structures. RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF O P Q R Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-12 Architectural Elements, Residential The Architectural Elements Residential group of standards are applicable to residential devel- opment. See the “How to Use This Document” chapter for more information on applicability of standards . architectural eleMents, residential standards (aers) ID #Description Ref.SF MF Intent R4.01 Promote attractive residential units that enhance the quality of neighborhoods and developments by integrating architectural ele- ments and details with building designs. ●● Goal R4.10 Use architectural elements and detailing to add interest and contribute to an aesthetic building character. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public spaces. ●● R4.1A Provide detailing that transition or frame façade material changes, and that integrate architectural elements such as lighting, doorways and windows. Examples include but are not limited to: cornice work, decorative caps on brick or stone, decorative lintels, porch railing, transom light, and shutters. A ●● Goal R4.20 Strategically locate focal points as key elements within the building design to enhance architectural character. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public space. ●● R4.2A Provide details that emphasize focal elements such as building corners, entries, or unique features. Detail examples include but are not limited to: quoin or rustication, canopies, and columns, or using roof lines and modulation to direct views. At least one focal element is required and must be accented with a contrast in color, texture, or modulation of the wall or roof plane. B ●● Goal R4.30 Incorporate windows into all applicable façade elevations and coor- dinate their placement and design with other architectural elements and material standards. ●● R4.3A Windows must be provided to allow views to exterior activity areas or vistas, and must be provided on any façade facing a pedestrian area or common area used for children's recreation. ●● R4.3B Anchor windows and other portals into building wall planes by integrating proportional detailing such as trim, lintels, shutters, railing, and ledges into the building design. C ●● »Stringcourses, lintels, and ledges are all appropriate techniques to transition varying material types into a cohesive design. »This prominent entryway feature makes use of columns with stone accents, ledges, portals, recessed lighting, and other architectural features such as corbels and tracery like features. »Windows can be anchored into the building façade through a variety of techniques such as trim, stringcourses, lintels, ledges, railing, or other detail work. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-13 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »This single family residential home has a number of added architectural elements including: {A} corbels to emphasize roof gables; {B} transom windows to create more interest; {C} stained wood columns and accents, to frame the entry and front of the house; {D} sidelights to emphasize the entry; {E} stone column bases with caps to anchor the building; and {F} shutters and trim around windows and vents to accent and transition materials. RESIDENTIAL: SFD Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-14 F A B D E C architectural eleMents, residential standards (aers) ID #Description Ref.SF MF Goal R4.40 Residential entries and multifamily stairwells must provide convenient access from parking and pedestrian areas, and be integrated into the overall site and building design. ●● R4.4A Primary building entries must be clearly defined using any unique combination of architectural elements, materials, or façade modula- tion meeting other architectural standards in this Manual. E ●● R4.4B Multifamily structures must provide internal site circulation to access individual residential units.F ○● R4.4C Multifamily stairwells must be integrated with the building design and provide residents protection from inclement weather. Use materials, modulation, and architectural elements which relate to and support other standards. G ○● »Building entries can use any combination of unique materials, façade or roof modulation, or other architectural elements to emphasize their prominence in the overall building design. »Multi-family developments must include robust site circulation and provide convenient connections between residential units and access to amenities, parking, and other public spaces. »Multi-family buildings with stairwells must provide protection from inclement weather using modulation, materials, or other architectural features meeting supportive standards. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: MF RESIDENTIAL: MF E F G Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-15 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »This multi-family residential building has a number of added architectural elements including: {A} corbels to transition and accent second story modulation; {B} arched portals highlighting outdoor balconies and entries; {C} stone columns, caps, and wrougt iron to delineate and accent outdoor spaces; {D} corbels to add interest to the eaves; and {E} added detail to the tops of the stone columns, to transition material changes. The building also has interesting roof lines that correspond with modulation in the façade. RESIDENTIAL: MFH Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-16 E C D B A Materials, Residential The Materials Residential group of standards are applicable to residential development . See the “How to Use This Document” chapter for more information on applicability of standards. Materials, residential standards (Mars) ID #Description Ref.SF MF Intent 5.01 Ensure that materials used for residential development promote and establish an architectural character that contributes to the aesthetic qualities of neighborhoods and protects adjacent property values. ●● Goal R5.10 Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design. Use materials from the following basic groups: wood, masonry, concrete, metal, and glazing. ●● R5.1A For buildings with façades that face multiple public roadways and/ or public spaces, use consistent material combinations, material quality, and architectural detailing. A ●● R5.1B Distinguish field materials from accent materials through pattern, texture, or additional detail visible from edge of nearest roadway. Alternate masonry or material courses may count toward this. ●● R5.1C Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. For example, wrap stone or stone-like products around visible corners to convey the appearance of mass, and not a thin veneer. B ●● R5.1D Non-durable materials, treatments, and finishes that deteriorate quickly with weather, ultra-violet light, and that are more susceptible to wear and tear are prohibited on permanent structures. ●● R5.1E Unfinished or colored ordinary smooth face block, untextured concrete panels, and prefabricated steel panels are prohibited as a finish material for building façades, except an accent or secondary field material. ●● Goal R5.20 Incorporate material and color changes as integrated details of the building design; maintain architectural integrity and promote a quality appearance and character. Applies to building façades visible from a public street, public space, and pedestrian environments. ●● R5.2A Use a cohesive color scheme featuring a minimum of two field colors, a trim color, and an accent color or unique material. Garage door colors must coincide with this scheme or other accents. C ●● »This structure consistently integrates a variety of field and accent materials, and other architectural elements, for all façades visible from a street or public space. »Masonry visible from multiple planes must wrap around corners and conclude at interior angles, or then transition to another material using appropriate accent materials and techniques. »In combination with modulation, materials, and other architectural features, colors supported through good design may be similar or even identical, and yet still distinct. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-17 Materials, residential standards (Mars) ID #Description Ref.SF MF R5.2B For each wall plane area greater than 20-feet in length or height, and visible from prescribed areas, incorporate at least two distinct field materials, patterns, or colors in any combination, for at least 25% of the visible area. Windows or portals with qualifying accent materials may count toward this requirement, when meeting overall material requirements for the façade elevation. D ●● R5.2C Vinyl siding must include a mix of material patterns, including but not limited to: board and batten, horizontal and vertical lap, shake, or shingles, and meeting other material requirements. ●● R5.2D Masonry as a qualifying accent material must be applied to 50 percent of the available wall length at a minimum height of 24 inches. (Available wall length does not include garage openings.) ●● Goal R5.30 Use colors that complement building materials and support innovative and good design practices. Applies to building façades visible from a public street, public spaces, and pedestrian environments. ●● R5.3A Use of subtle, neutral, or natural tones must be integrated with at least one accent or field material.E ●● R5.3B Use of intensely bright and fluorescent colors, as well as the widespread use of saturated hues without complementary colors, materials, and accents, is not allowed. ●● R5.3C Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as some metals or reflective glazing, must not redirect light towards roadways, public spaces, or adjacent uses in a way which constitutes a public nuisance or safety hazard. ●● Goal R5.40 When practical, organize building service equipment, including, but not limited to, utility, service, and mechanical, away from building entries, roadways, public spaces, and adjacent buildings. ●● R5.4A All roof and wall mounted mechanical, electrical, communications, and service equipment must be screened from public view from the adjacent public streets and properties by the use of parapets, walls, fences, enclosures, or by other suitable means. F ●● »A large wall plane must integrate secondary elements, such as the incorporation of additional materials, colors, or by enhancing architectural features such as windows. »The white accent trim pieces and splash of orange on the first story, along with inset patio areas, help to offset and provide color and contrast to the expansive use of light earth colors. »Landscaping can be a simple and effective means to hide or partially screen mechanical equipment, including equipment not mounted to the building surface. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF D E F Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-18 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »This single-family home contains a number of materials to integrate and relate design elements to another. These include: {A} distinct trim colors; {B} board and batten siding in a neutral field color, to compliment accent colors and stone materials; {C} window trim and stone ledges to integrate windows; {D} gutters colored to match trim; and {E} a stone field material used to anchor the building and transition into other materials, with ledges, trim, and stone caps. All stone façade materials wrap around outside corners and are finished off with trim or other transitional material. The home also includes a number of roof slopes and ridges coinciding with modulation. RESIDENTIAL: SFG Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-19 B C A E D DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »A light yellow field color in combination with white accent trim, greenery, and a complimentary stone field material yields a vibrant and eye catching color palette with depth and interest. »Bold and vibrant colors and color combinations, such as this red board and batten siding, can help to establish a unique identify, enhance a sense of place, and work to improve wayfinding for guests and residents. »The slight modulation of the second story in combination with supportive corbels, white accent material, and use of stone creates an attractive and timeless appearance. »The bay window is not only prominent because of the façade and roof modulation, but is also accented by the stone veneer applied to the primary wall plane on both sides and above. RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF H I J K Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-20 Lighting, Residential The Lighting Residential group of standards are applicable to residential development . See the “How to Use This Document” chapter for more information on applicability of standards. lighting, residential standards (lirs) ID #Description Ref.SF MF Intent R6.00 Integrate architectural lighting as cohesive elements of building designs that contribute to the atmosphere of the built environments and enhance safety. ○● Goal R6.10 Use lighting on building exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environ- ments along roadways, at intersections, and in public spaces.○● R6.1A Lighting fixture spacing and height along streetscapes and roadways must be placed to avoid conflicts with tree plantings.A ○● R6.1B Use energy-efficient architectural lighting.○● R6.1C Use lighting fixtures that are consistent with other decorative hardware on the building. For example, select lighting hardware with similar color and shape as other building hardware, use recessed lighting, incorporate uniform spacing, integrate with other accents and reveals, and coordinate specialty lights with predominate architectural features. B C ○● »Careful consideration of street tree and lighting placement is critical to prevent competing elements from diminishing benefits such as safety and comfort. »Architectural lighting doesn’t have to be fancy or stylish to work well with the building design. In this case the dark casing around the light accents the adjacent railing. »Specialty lighting adds detail and enhances the sense of completion in a building design, while also providing necessary safety accommodations. DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF RESIDENTIAL: MF RESIDENTIAL: SF, MF A B C Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-21 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW »More important than architectural features or façade modulation, this single-family residence also incorporates {A} pedestrian lighting near the roadway, enhancing resident, pedestrian, and motorist safety. The building also incorporates a number of other interesting architectural elements, including: {B} wrought iron integrated into the gateway and fencing design {C} bold accent colors and materials that not only highlight points of interest (and entry), but also transition materials and modulation; {D} stone columns with caps to frame the entryway; and {E} transition of materials to highlight and frame windows. RESIDENTIAL: SFD Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l S t a n d a r d s DD-22 A D E C B E DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW AppendicesSeCtion E Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Ap p e n d i c e s EE-1 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Appendix 1: Definitions Definitions Name Description Accent See Materials Definition Architectural Feature The combination or composition of materials, colors, articulation, modulation, and architectural elements to create a unique feature of the building design. Art, Artwork A device, element, or feature whose primary purpose is to express, enhance, or illustrate aesthetic quality, feeling, physical entity, idea, local condition, historical or mythical happening, or cultural or social value. Examples of artwork include sculpture, mural, or unique specially crafted lighting, furniture, pave- ment, landscaping, or architectural treatment that is intended primarily, but not necessarily exclusively, for aesthetic purpose. Articulation: The manner in which the form or portions of a building are expressed to empha- size or create distinct patterns or rhythms that enhance the design and add visual interest or pedestrian scale. Articulation, Horizontal: Articulation left and right across the span of a wall façade. Examples include ledges, reveals awnings, column caps, arches, or other projecting or recessed architectural feature. Awning:A fixed cover, typically comprised of cloth over metal frame, that is placed over windows or building openings as protection from the sun and rain. Blank wall: A wall or building façade that has no fenestration, architectural detail, modula- tion, or material variation to enhance adjacent roadways, public spaces, or to provide visual interest or add pedestrian scale. Color, Fluores- cent Any material which absorbs and then emits some portion of light. Often has the appearance of “glowing”. Not to be confused with neon light. Color, Saturation Saturation can be characterized in the RGB (red, green, blue) color scheme, as HSB (Hue, Saturation, and brightness). Intensely saturated colors are defined in this Manual as any color with 90% or greater saturation (S), and greater than 80% brightness (B). Composition:The arrangement of elements based on proportion or relation to form a unified whole. Connectivity:The interconnectedness of roadways, pathways, transit routes, and pedestrian ways that support convenient and/or multiple mobility options. Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Ap p e n d i c e s EE-3 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Name Description Elevation Elevation is used in the context of perspective, not the building height, and is the flat representation of one view (façade). See also Façade definition. Façade: Typically the front, but any side of a building or exterior wall that faces a public way or space (for example, a street or plaza) and often distinguished from other building sides by architectural details. A typical building has four facades or faces, viewed from the north, south, east, and west, or some variation (e.g. north-west). Faux Window A faux window is a portion of the façade enclosed with a decorative trim such as stone or brick, and covered in a distinct material (typically darker) which varies from the surrounding field material. Finish Materials Materials which are non-essential to complete the building design and are used in addition to primary and secondary materials. Fenestration: The arrangement, design, proportioning, or general disposition of windows and other openings in the exterior walls of a building. Fenestration requirements for buildings do not count toward minimum number of exterior material or color types, unless they exceed required fenestration coverage areas by 10% for applicable areas, and minimum Field Materials (see definition) area for all other facades. Roll-up doors must function in part as windows when closed and com- ply with all applicable standards to qualify as fenestration. Floor Height Equivalent Floor height equivalent refers to the massing and design of a building that appears to have more stories than it does. One (1) story is equivalent of 10 to 20-feet, and each 20-feet after is considered to be another story. Building height is measured from respective adjacent grade to median parapet or ridgeline roof height of an elevation. Focal point:A building, structure, open space, or other feature that naturally draws the eye and provides an aesthetically pleasing view. Hardscape: The use of hardened surface materials to create unique patterns of color, design, and texture in order to create visual interest; also refers to those areas that have received such improvements. Integrated Build- ing Mixed use development such as vertical mixed-use or a live-work unit. See mixed-use definition. Landscaping:Vegetation, trees, and other plant materials that soften the built environment, making it more inviting to pedestrians. Massing:The three-dimensional bulk of a structure: height, width, and depth. Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Ap p e n d i c e s EE-4 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Name Description Material(s), Accent Distinct materials or color used to provide emphasis of architectural features or areas of the building. Accent materials to be used less than field materials and between 5 and 25% of applicable façade elevations, excluding exterior fenestra- tion coverage. Qualifying accent materials must either be a different material type, have a different cut size or installation technique (such as types of masonry rows), or be a unique color. Awnings or canopies with a unique material type and meeting visible coverage areas may qualify. Material(s), Field Materials or colors used for at least 20% of applicable façade elevations, exclud- ing all fenestration area. See color and fenestration definitions. There is no limit on number of field materials provided other coverage requirements are met. Accent materials in excess of minimum requirements, which meet required area in total, may count as a field material. Visible roofing material meeting all other material and roof standards, including elevation area requirements, may count as a field material. See also Fenestration definition. Mixed-use devel- opment: Projects that integrate three or more income-generating land uses, such as resi- dential, commercial, and office, with a strong pedestrian orientation. Mixed-use development may occur horizontally in separate buildings within a project, be vertically integrated and occurring on multiple floors within one building, or be a combination of the two. See also the definition for Uses. Modulation: In the design standards, modulation is a stepping back or projecting forward of portions of a building face or roofline within specified intervals of building width and depth as a means of breaking up the apparent bulk of a structure's continu- ous exterior walls. Pedestrian scale: The inclusion of building design elements at the ground or street level and the relationship between building height and streetscape. Building design elements exclusive to the first and second building story (when greater than two), or inclu- sion of streetscape elements such as trees, decorative lighting, and benches can help to create pedestrian scale. Public Entry Access to a building intended for the general public, and not restricted access intended only for service, deliveries, or employees. Special event access, emer- gency only, or exit only access is exempt from this definition. Public space Facilities such as public roads, parks, pathways, and open space corridors. May also be facilities owned privately but open to the public, such as HOA pathways connected to larger networks. Common areas serving as an amenity for com- mercial and multi-family developments are also considered to be public space. Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Ap p e n d i c e s EE-5 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Name Description Reveal In the context of this Manual, a reveal is a linear break in material application or depth. Reveals are intended to provide architectural definition and material interest by accenting building geometry, fenestration, or by creating additional depth through distinct shadow lines. Reveals depending on material be may multi-purpose and necessary for material expansion and contraction. A reveal may also be known as a channel, score line, reglet, expansion joint, or similar term. Scale or architec- tural scale: Scale includes the height, size, mass, and proportions of buildings or portions thereof and refers to the spatial relationships and appearances among struc- tures, whether along a street or block front, on adjoining lots or within the same site. Sign See City of Meridian Unified Development Code for definition. See also defini- tion for “copy”. No part of a sign or sign cabinet may constitute a required mate- rial or accent standard. Street wall: The cumulative effect of many buildings providing a consistent edge to the public street, creating a public space defined by a wall of buildings. On com- mercial corridors and in mixed-use areas, the street wall is typically immediately adjacent to the sidewalk. Streetscape: The visual character along a roadway created by the combined use of elements such as building façades, landscaping, trees, open space, paving, plantings, side- walks, lighting, signs, and furniture. Transom Horizontal opening or window typically multi-paned and above a doorway or a larger window. More generally, any window placed to permit passage of light further into a building envelope. May also provide increased privacy when placed independently of other fenestration, and used to accent building facades when larger windows are inappropriate. Uses A specific purpose unique for all or portion of an area or structure, and the man- ner in which it is arranged, designed, constructed, altered, converted, rented, leased, or intended to be maintained and/or occupied. Wall Plane Any face of a building not including recesses, parapets, or other modulation. Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Ap p e n d i c e s EE-6 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Appendix 2: Photo Examples Index of Photo Examples Non-Residential 9 ■Commercial District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 ■Traditional Neighborhood District . . . . . .15 ■Industrial District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 Residential 20 ■Multi-Family Residential Districts . . . . . . .20 ■Single-Family Residential District . . . . . . .24 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | EE-7 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: Many images contained in this appendix include features not referenced. The elements chosen to be referenced are those determined to be the best examples, and not necessarily all examples. Index of Photo Examples a ■Alley: E-25 ■Awning: E-9, E-10 , E-14 . See Canopy b ■Balcony: E-18 , E-20, E-22 c ■Canopy: E-9, E-10 , E-15 Architectural Canopy: E-11 , E-12, E-13 , E-14 , E-15 , E-17, E-18 , E-19 ■Columns: E-10 , E-12 , E-22, E-23, E-27 ■Courtyard: E-24 d ■Drive-through: E-9 e ■Entryway: E-10 , E-11 , E-12 , E-17, E-21, E-23, E-24, E-27 F ■Façade Detailing Banding: E-9, E-13 , E-15 , E-21 Corbel: E-21, E-25, E-27 Ledge: E-9, E-10 , E-12, E-18 , E-25, E-26 Reveal: E-9, E-10 , E-12, E-13 , E-14 , E-17, E-18 , E-19 Trim: E-12, E-24 , E-25, E-26 , E-27 ■Fenestration Faux Fenestration: E-10 Sidelight: E-24, E-27 Transom: E-13 , E-24 , E-27 Window: E-9, E-11 , E-12, E-13 , E-15 , E-18 , E-25 g ■Garage: E-26, E-27 l ■Landscaping: E-15 Open Space: E-15 , E-22, E-23 Patio. See Patio Raised Planter: E-9, E-11, E-13 , E-14 , E-16 , E-19 Streetscape: E-10 , E-15 , E-16 , E-20 Trellis: E-13 Wall: E-15 Water Feature: E-12 ■Lighting Accent Lighting: E-9, E-16 Specialty Lighting: E-9, E-10 , E-14 , E-15 , E-16 , E-20 ■Lintel: E-25 M ■Mailbox: E-21, E-25 ■Materials: E-9, E-10 , E-15 Brick. See Stone and Brick Color Variation: E-9, E-11 , E-15 , E-18 , E-23, E-27 Concrete: E-14 , E-17, E-18 , E-19 Concrete Masonry Unit: E-11 , E-13 , E-14 , E-17, E-18 , E-19 Masonry. See Stone and Brick Metal: E-11, E-14 , E-18 , E-19 Natural Appearance: E-10 , E-13 , E-21, E-22, E-27 Siding: E-20, E-21, E-23, E-26, E-27 Stone. See Stone & Brick Stucco: E-9, E-10 , E-11 , E-12, E-14 , E-17, E-25, E-26, E-27 Texture Variation: E-17, E-18 Wood: E-9, E-14 , E-27 ■Modulation Façade Modulation: E-9, E-10 , E-11, E-12 , E-15 , E-16, E-17, E-20, E-22, E-24, E-25, E-27 Roof Modulation: E-10 , E-13 , E-16 , E-19 , E-20 , E-22, E-24 , E-25, E-27 P ■Parking Covered Parking: E-14 , E-21, E-23 ■Patio: E-22, E-23 ■Pedestrian Scale: E-9, E-10 , E-13 , E-15 ■Porch: E-26 , E-27 r ■Railing: E-20, E-22 ■Roof Dormer: E-16, E-20, E-25 Eaves: E-11, E-22, E-23, E-25, E-27 Fascia: E-10 , E-23, E-25, E-27 Overhang: E-16, E-23 Parapet: E-10 , E-11 , E-12, E-18 Soffit: E-20, E-22, E-23, E-25 s ■Sign: E-11 ■Stairwell: E-21 ■Stone and Brick: E-9, E-10 , E-12 , E-13 , E-15 , E-16 , E-22, E-23, E-25, E-26, E-27 Course Variation: E-13 , E-16 Masonry Cap: E-9, E-15 , E-22, E-26 Wrap corners. See Materials: Natural Appearance w ■Wayfinding: E-23 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Ph o t o E x a m p l e s EE-8 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. Non-Residential RefeRences: Accent Lighting, Awning, Ledge, Masonry Cap, Pedestrian Scale, Specialty Lighting, Stone and Brick RefeRences: Awning, Canopy, Drive-through, Façade Modulation, Materials, Pedestrian Scale, Reveal, Window RefeRences: Canopy, Materials, Pedestrian Scale, Raised Planter, Stone and Brick, Window, Wood RefeRences: Banding, Color Variation, Materials, Stone and Brick, Stucco ROSAUERS PIER 1 IMPORTS BIG AL’S BOWLING DICK’S SPORTING GOODS A B C D co MMercial d istrict P hotos Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-9 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. c o MM ercial district P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Columns, Entryway RefeRences: Fascia, Façade Modulation, Roof Modulation, Stone and Brick RefeRences: Awning, Canopy, Faux Fenestration, Façade Modulation, Ledge, Materials, Parapet, Pedestrian Scale, Reveal, Specialty Lighting, Streetscape RefeRences: Façade Modulation, Natural Appearance, Roof Modulation, Stone and Brick, Stucco THE VILLAGE AT MERIDIAN PAD SITE KEY BANK (OVERLAND RD) TACO BELL (EAGLE RD)IDAHO GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES E F G H Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-10 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. c o MM ercial district P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Color Variation, Eaves, Entryway, Parapet, Sign RefeRences: Parapet, Window RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Color Variation, Concrete Masonry Unit, Façade Modu- lation, Raised Planter RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Metal, Stucco, Window WALMART (TEN MILE RD)MULTI-TENANT BUILDING (OVERLAND RD) IDAHO UROLOGICAL INSTITUTE JAKERS BAR & GRILL I J K L Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-11 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. c o MM ercial district P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Façade Modulation, Reveal, Stucco, Water Feature, Window RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Entryway, Parapet, Stone and Brick, Trim RefeRences: Stone and Brick RefeRences: Columns, Ledge EAGLE ROAD PROFESSIONAL CENTER MATERIAL AND ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT (MERIDIAN CITY HALL) PKG (PINE AVE)IDAHO SURGERY CENTER M N O P Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-12 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. c o MM ercial district P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Course Variation, Roof Modulation, Stone and Brick RefeRences: Concrete Masonry Unit, Natural Appearance, Pedestrian Scale, Raised Planter, Trellis RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Course Variation, Stone and Brick, Transom RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Banding, Reveal, Window MULTI-TENANT BUILDING (EMERALD AVE)MULTI-TENANT BUILDING, (EMERALD AVE) MULTI-TENANT BUILDING (COBALT POINT WAY)MATERIAL EXAMPLES (VILLAGE AT MERIDIAN) Q R S T Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-13 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. c o MM ercial district P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Concrete Masonry Unit, Covered Parking, Wood RefeRences: Awning, Specialty Lighting RefeRences: Metal, Reveal, Stucco RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Concrete, Metal, Raised Planter MOUNTAIN WEST BANK (ALLEN ST)BIG AL’S COVERED PARKING BRINEGAR BUILDING ROSAUER’S U V W X Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-14 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. traditional neighborhood d istrict P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Canopy, Landscaping, Materials, Pedestrian Scale, Stone and Brick, Window RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Banding, Façade Modulation, Open Space, Specialty Lighting, Wall RefeRences: Color Variation, Specialty Lighting, Streetscape RefeRences: Masonry Cap, Streetscape, Wall GINO’S ITALIAN RISTORANTE, FACING RESIDENTIAL CITY HALL GRAMERCY PLAZA (WELLS AVE)36TH STREET GARDEN PLAZA A B C D Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-15 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. traditional neighborhood d istrict P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Course Variation, Roof Modulation, Stone and Brick RefeRences: RefeRences: Accent Lighting, Raised Planter, Specialty Lighting, Streetscape RefeRences: Dormer, Façade Modulation, Overhang, Roof Modulation USTICK NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER (FAST EDDY’S)MATERIAL EXAMPLE (BRICK MASONRY) GRAMERCY (WELLS AVE)MATERIAL EXAMPLE (OLD WITH NEW) E F G H Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-16 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. i ndustrial d istrict P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Concrete, Façade Modulation, Reveal, Texture Variation RefeRences: Reveal, Texture Variation RefeRences: Concrete, Reveal RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Concrete Masonry Unit, Entryway, Reveal, Stucco H.D. FOWLER COMPANY TRANE MULTI-TENANT BUILDING (EMERALD AVE)MATERIAL EXAMPLE (COLOR AND TEXTURE) A B C D Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-17 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. i ndustrial d istrict P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Balcony, Concrete, Ledge, Parapet, Reveal, Texture Variation, Window RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Color Variation, Concrete, Reveal RefeRences: Color Variation, Concrete RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Concrete Masonry Unit, Metal, Reveal MATERIAL EXAMPLE (CONCRETE)STORAGE WAREHOUSE (PINE AVE) MULTI-TENANT BUILDING (EMERALD ST)H.D. FOWLER COMPANY E F G H Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-18 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. i ndustrial d istrict P hotosNon-Residential RefeRences: Metal RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Concrete, Metal, Raised Planter RefeRences: Concrete, Concrete Masonry Unit, Roof Modulation RefeRences: Architectural Canopy, Reveal OREGON TILE & MARBLE (EXECUTIVE DR)MULTI-TENANT BUILDING (EXECUTIVE DR) MATERIAL EXAMPLE (METAL SEAM)MULTI-TENANT BUILDING (EXECUTIVE DR) I J K L Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | No n - R e s i d e n t i a l EE-19 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. M ulti -Fa Mily P hotosResidential RefeRences: Balcony, Railing, Siding, Soffit RefeRences: Siding, Specialty Lighting, Streetscape RefeRences: Balcony, Railing RefeRences: Dormer, Façade Modulation, Roof Modulation, Siding FIELDS AT GRAMERCY FIELDS AT GRAMERCY (BALCONY) REGENCY AT RIVER VALLEY (BALCONY)REGENCY AT RIVER VALLEY (CLUBHOUSE) A B C D Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l EE-20 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. M ulti -Fa Mily P hotosResidential RefeRences: Mailbox RefeRences: Covered Parking, Entryway RefeRences: Banding, Corbel, Siding RefeRences: Natural Appearance, Stairwell REGENCY AT RIVER VALLEY (COVERED ENTRY)COMMUNITY MAILBOXES GRAMERCY VILLAS GRAMERCY VILLAS E F G H Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l EE-21 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. M ulti -Fa Mily P hotosResidential RefeRences: Eaves, Railing, Soffit, Stone and Brick RefeRences: Open Space, Patio RefeRences: Balcony, Columns, Façade Modulation, Masonry Cap, Natural Appearance, Roof Modulation, Stone and Brick RefeRences: Balcony, Patio, Railing GRAMERCY VILLAS RED TAIL (AMENITY) RED TAIL (BALCONIES)RED TAIL (COVERED ENTRIES) I J K L Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l EE-22 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. M ulti -Fa Mily P hotosResidential RefeRences: Color Variation, Overhang, Patio, Siding RefeRences: Open Space RefeRences: Columns, Eaves, Entryway, Fascia, Soffit, Stone and Brick RefeRences: Covered Parking, Wayfinding RED TAIL (CLUBHOUSE)RED TAIL (PATHWAYS) LINDER SPRINGS (DIRECTORY)LINDER SPRINGS M N O P Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l EE-23 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. s ingle -Fa M ily P hotosResidential RefeRences: Courtyard, Entryway RefeRences: Façade Modulation, Roof Modulation, Transom RefeRences: Entryway, Sidelight, Transom RefeRences: Façade Modulation, Trim ROOF AND FAÇADE MODULATION ENTRYWAY FOCAL ELEMENT ENTRYWAY & COURTYARD FAÇADE MODULATION A B C D Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l EE-24 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. s ingle -Fa M ily P hotosResidential RefeRences: Dormer, Fascia, Ledge, Lintel RefeRences: Corbel, Eaves, Fascia, Ledge, Lintel, Soffit, Window RefeRences: Alley, Façade Modulation, Mailbox, Roof Modulation, Stone and Brick, Trim RefeRences: Dormer, Eaves, Fascia, Roof Modulation, Stone and Brick, Stucco ROOF MODULATION & ACCENTS REAR ALLEY-LOADED ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS FRONT PORCH & GABLE E F G H Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l EE-25 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. M ulti -Fa Mily d istricts s ingle -Fa M ily P hotosResidential RefeRences: Garage RefeRences: Porch, Stone and Brick, Stucco RefeRences: Ledge, Masonry Cap, Stone and Brick RefeRences: Porch, Siding, Trim WRAP-AROUND PORCH GARAGE ACCENTS MATERIAL TRANSITIONS FRONT PORCH & MODULATION I J K L Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l EE-26 DRAFT | WWW.MERIDIANCITY.ORG/DESIGNREVIEW Note: The above images reflect desirable building elements within the City of Meridian. Only the visible façade elements depicted in the image are considered to be compliant or acceptable alternatives with the intent, goals, and standards within this Manual, and only within applicable districts and locations. M ulti -Fa Mily d istricts s ingle -Fa M ily P hotosResidential RefeRences: Color Variation, Eaves, Entryway, Fascia, Stone and Brick, Stucco RefeRences: Columns, Corbel, Natural Appearance, Porch, Roof Modulation, Sidelight, Siding, Stone and Brick, Transom, Wood RefeRences: Color Variation, Façade Modulation, Trim RefeRences: Garage, Sidelight, Transom SIDELIGHTS & TRANSOM WINDOWS TRANSITION OF FORMS ACCENT MATERIALS & COLORS ACCENT MATERIALS M N O P Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n A r c h i t e c t u r a l S t a n d a r d s M a n u a l | Re s i d e n t i a l EE-27 1 Changes below are grammatical in nature or to help with readability, with no change to standard requirements or applicability. Text in the middle column shows the previous text with items to be removed (strike-through), and the right column shows proposed text with additions (underlines). ID Staff Revision 5, Before P&Z 11/19/2015 Current Standard (with new text highlighted) 1.30 Incorporate design principles to include rhythm, repetition, framing, and/or proportion. Applies to all sides of a building façade facing public roadways, visible from residential neighborhood or public spaces, or facing the public entry of an adjacent building. Incorporate design principles to include rhythm, repetition, framing, and/or proportion. Applies to all sides of a building façade facing public roadways, that are visible from residential neighborhoods or public spaces, or facing the public entry of an adjacent building. 2.1B For buildings with façades longer than 200-feet, reduce massing of buildings by grouping or incorporating smaller tenant spaces along the commercial façade, or by incorporating at least one significant modulation whose depth is at least 3% of the total façade length or 10- feet, and whose width in combination is at least 20% of the façade length. For buildings with façades longer than 200-feet, reduce massing of buildings by grouping or incorporating smaller tenant spaces along the commercial façade, or by incorporating at least one significant modulation with depth at least 3% of the total façade length or 10-feet, and a width in combination at least 20% of the façade length. 2.30 Incorporate pedestrian-scale architectural features to support an aesthetic character that contributes to the quality of the building design and connectivity with the surrounding environment. Applies to façades: in development visible from arterial or collector roadways, adjacent to residential developments facing roadways, facing an adjacent buildings primary building entries, and adjacent to public spaces. Incorporate pedestrian-scale architectural features to support an aesthetic character that contributes to the quality of the building design and connectivity with the surrounding environment. Applies to façades in developments: visible from arterial or collector roadways, adjacent to residential developments facing roadways, facing an adjacent building's primary building entries, and adjacent to public spaces. 2.3A Consistently incorporate at least two (2) architectural features into the building design that are pedestrian scale, to include: fenestration patterns, architectural elements such as ledges, lighting, or canopies, material or pattern banding, or detailing (see Pedestrian Scale definition). Consistently incorporate at least two (2) architectural features into the building design that are pedestrian scale, to include: fenestration patterns; architectural elements such as ledges, lighting, or canopies; material or pattern banding; or detailing (see Pedestrian Scale definition). 2.4A For buildings fronting local and collector roadways, off street parking must be located to the side of or behind buildings; off street parking is not allowed between the roadway and building. For buildings fronting local and collector roadways, off-street parking must be located to the side of or behind buildings; off-street parking is not allowed between the roadway and building. 2 ID Staff Revision 5, Before P&Z 11/19/2015 Current Standard (with new text highlighted) 2.4B Limit building separation from the roadway to streetscape and pedestrian supportive use areas, such as locations for street furnishings, outdoor dining, small plazas, public spaces, or store fronts. Limit building separation from the roadway to streetscape and pedestrian supportive use areas, such as locations for street furnishings, outdoor dining, small plazas, public spaces, or storefronts. 3.10 Articulate building forms, including but not limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of aesthetic building designs. Applies to façades in: developments along arterial and collector roadways, adjacent to residential developments facing roadways, facing public entries of adjacent buildings, and visible from public spaces. Articulate building forms, including but not limited to massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of aesthetic building designs. Applies to façades in developments: along arterial and collector roadways, adjacent to residential developments facing roadways, facing public entries of adjacent buildings, and visible from public spaces. 3.1A Incorporate at least one type of the following modulations in the façade plane, including, but not limited to: projections, recesses, and step backs that articulate wall planes and break up building mass. Examples include but are not limited to: columns with trim or accent materials, change in finished material depths, building overhangs, and inset features and materials such as false windows or fenestration with architectural accents. Incorporate at least one type of the following modulations in the façade plane, including but not limited to projections, recesses, and step backs that articulate wall planes and break up building mass. Examples include but are not limited to columns with trim or accent materials, change in finished material depths, building overhangs, and inset features and materials such as false windows or fenestration with architectural accents. R3.1C For applicable façades equal to or longer than 20-feet, provide a minimum total modulation area of 20% the horizontal wall span, with a minimum vertical height of at least 3-feet. Porches and balconies may count towards this. For applicable façades equal to or longer than 20-feet, provide a minimum total modulation area of 20% the horizontal wall span, with a minimum vertical height of at least 3-feet. Porches and balconies may count toward this. 3.20 Incorporate visual and physical distinctions in the building design that enhance building forms, articulate façades, identify entries, integrate pedestrian scale, and to visually anchor the building to the ground or street level. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public spaces, and façades with public entries. Incorporate visual and physical distinctions in the building design that enhance building forms, articulate façades, identify entries, integrate pedestrian scale, and visually anchor the building to the ground or street level. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public space, and to façades with public entries. 3 ID Staff Revision 5, Before P&Z 11/19/2015 Current Standard (with new text highlighted) 3.4A For flat roofs, incorporate primary and secondary roof elements including but not limited to: multiple material types along parapets, multiple parapet elevations with at least 1-foot change in elevation, or modulation of at least 2-feet in the parapet, such as along entryway overhangs. Qualifying elements must exist for at least 20% the length of applicable façades. May also incorporate secondary roofs types, such as hip roofs along overhangs. For flat roofs, incorporate primary and secondary roof elements including but not limited to: multiple material types along parapets, multiple parapet elevations with at least 1-foot change in elevation, or modulation of at least 2-feet in the parapet, such as along entryway overhangs. Qualifying elements must exist for at least 20% the length of applicable façades. May also incorporate secondary roof types, such as hip roofs along overhangs. 3.4C Provide variation in roof profile over façade modulation and/or articulation over façade material/color transitions. Options include, but are not limited to: varying parapet heights; two or more roof planes; continuation of façade modulation through roof lines, dormers; lookout; overhang eaves; sloped roofs; or cornice work. Provide variation in roof profile over façade modulation and/or articulation over façade material/color transitions. Options include, but are not limited to: varying parapet heights; two or more roof planes; continuation of façade modulation through roof lines; dormers; lookouts; overhang eaves; sloped roofs; or cornice work. R4.20 Strategically locate focal points as key elements within the building design to enhance architectural character. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public spaces. Strategically locate focal points as key elements within the building design to enhance architectural character. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public space. R4.4A Primary building entries must be clearly defined using any unique combination of architectural elements, materials, or façade modulation meeting other standards. Primary building entries must be clearly defined using any unique combination of architectural elements, materials, or façade modulation meeting other architectural standards in this Manual. R5.1B Distinguish field materials from accent materials through pattern, texture, or additional detail visible from edge of nearest roadway. Alternate masonry or material courses may count towards this. Distinguish field materials from accent materials through pattern, texture, or additional detail visible from edge of nearest roadway. Alternate masonry or material courses may count toward this. R5.1C Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. For example, wrap stone or stone-like products around visible corners to convey the appearance of mass, and not as a thin veneer. Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. For example, wrap stone or stone-like products around visible corners to convey the appearance of mass, and not a thin veneer. 4 ID Staff Revision 5, Before P&Z 11/19/2015 Current Standard (with new text highlighted) 5.1E Distinguish field materials from accent materials through pattern, texture, or additional detail visible from edge of nearest roadway. Alternate masonry or material courses with relief from primary plane may count towards this. Distinguish field materials from accent materials through pattern, texture, or additional detail visible from edge of nearest roadway. Alternate masonry or material courses with relief from primary plane may count toward this. R5.2B For each wall plane area greater than 20-feet in length or height, and visible from prescribed areas, incorporate at least two distinct field materials, patterns, or colors in any combination, for at least 25% of the visible area. Windows or portals with qualifying accent materials may count towards this requirement, when meeting overall material requirements for the façade elevation. For each wall plane area greater than 20-feet in length or height, and visible from prescribed areas, incorporate at least two distinct field materials, patterns, or colors in any combination, for at least 25% of the visible area. Windows or portals with qualifying accent materials may count toward this requirement, when meeting overall material requirements for the façade elevation. 5.30 Integrate roll-up doors, will call doors, drive through doors, and loading docks into the building design, and locate them in a manner which does not create pedestrian, drive aisle, or roadway conflicts. Applies to façades along arterial and collector roadways, and façades facing public spaces. Integrate roll-up doors, will-call doors, drive-through doors, and loading docks into the building design, and locate them in a manner which does not create pedestrian, drive aisle, or roadway conflicts. Applies to façades along arterial and collector roadways, and façades facing public spaces. 5.3A For commercial and traditional neighborhood districts, roll-up and drive through doors are allowed when integrated into the building design, but will call doors with roll ups and loading docks are prohibited. Consider material variation and transitions, modulation, and other architectural features and standards for the design. For commercial and traditional neighborhood districts, roll-up and drive-through doors are allowed when integrated into the building design, but will-call doors with roll-ups and loading docks are prohibited. Consider material variation and transitions, modulation, and other architectural features and standards for the design. 5.3B For industrial district properties, will call and roll-up doors are allowed when integrated into the building design, but loading docks are prohibited. Consider material variation, transitions, modulation, and other architectural features and standards for the design. For industrial district properties, will-call and roll-up doors are allowed when integrated into the building design, but loading docks are prohibited. Consider material variation, transitions, modulation, and other architectural features and standards for the design. 6.00 Integrate signs and architectural lighting as cohesive elements of building designs that contribute to the atmosphere of the built environments and enhance safety. Integrate signs and architectural lighting as cohesive elements of building designs that contribute to the atmosphere of the built environment and enhance safety. Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref I 1.00 Promote visually aesthetic building designs that incorporate quality architectural characteristics and establish built environments that are compatible with existing, planned, and anticipated adjacent land uses. ●●●C-2.1.2.1. To encourage visually aesthetic building designs that promote quality architectural character and establish built environments that are compatible with existing, planned, and/or anticipated adjacent land uses. C and D the same. Residential? Consider merge with similar B, but this is distinct and not "downtown"D-2.1.2.1. G 1.10 Articulate building designs to frame and accentuate public spaces with pedestrian scale elements and details.●●●B-2.1.3.3. Building design should enhance public and urban spaces, articulate an urban form, and provide human and pedestrian scale. Similar in B, C, D, and E. Merge all C-2.1.3.4. G 1.11 Building design should address building scale, mass, form, and use a variety of materials and architectural features to ensure an aesthetic contribution compatible with surrounding buildings. ●●●B-2.1.3.1. Building design should appropriately address building scale, mass, and form, and the use of materials, architectural elements, and details to ensure a compatible and aesthetic contribution to the urban environment. B, C, D, and E all share similarities. Merge C-2.1.3.1. S 1.1A Maintain consistent and contiguous pedestrian environments across developments. Limit circuitous connections and maintain clear visibility. ●●●B- 2.1.3.3.3. Design building façades that define and articulate an appropriately scaled street wall to maintain contiguous pedestrian environments and support public spaces. B, C, D, and E all include similar. B and E vary a bit. Split into two; this is the first half. S 1.1B Provide pedestrian connections to non-private public spaces.●●○ Design building façades that define and articulate an appropriately scaled street wall to maintain contiguous pedestrian environments and support public spaces. This was B-2.1.3.3.3 but split into two separate items. This is the second half.B-2.1.3.3.3. S 1.1C Incorporate architectural features on all sides of a building façade facing: the primary entrance(s) of an adjacent building, public roadways, interior site amenities, and façades that are visible from public spaces. See Architectural Elements, Building Form, and Materials sections. ●●○C- 2.1.3.3.1. Design all appropriate sides of buildings, including façades that face public roadways, public spaces, other buildings, interior site elements, and adjacent uses, to unify a consistent building design and appearance with the consistent use of materials, elements, and color. Mayor / Council have historiclly been very clear that buildings facing major roadways, including even residential, should not just be boxes. Same in C, D, and E. Merge for all - does not conflict with B S 1.1D Buildings must orient, frame, and/or direct pedestrian views to adjacent cultural buildings, parks, and plazas.●●○B- 2.1.3.3.1. Design buildings and structures to enhance the attractiveness and appeal of prominent landmarks, civic and cultural buildings, parks, plazas, streetscapes, view corridors, and other public and urban spaces. S 1.1E Design and orient buildings not to impede access. The building should enhance the appeal of open space and pedestrian environments ●●○C- 2.1.3.4.1. Design buildings to enhance the attractiveness and appeal of developments, define public and open space, establish community identity, and promote pedestrian environments. Similar in C, D, and E. More detailed in B. Merge basic level for all D-2.1.3.4.1. G 1.20 Design building façades to express architectural character and incorporate the use of design principles to unify developments and buildings, and relate to adjacent and surrounding uses. ●●●C-2.1.3.3. Design building façades that express architectural character and incorporate the use of design principles to unify developments and buildings, and relate to adjacent and surrounding uses. Split into 3 parts, 1 of 3. One goal and two standards. Reverted to original text from DM as a Goal, with more specific direction to different types of standards. Make generic for all, including B which is worded differently and more specific (but does not conflict with this as core guideline) B-2.1.3.3.3. S 1.2A Comply and adhere with all previously required building design elements that were included as part of a Development Agreement, Conditional Use Permit, and/or other requirements as part of prior approval. ●●●Split into 3 parts, 2 of 3. Applies to all commercial development.B-2.1.3.3.3. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)1 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S 1.2B New construction must share at least three similar accent materials, field materials, or other architectural feature of a building within 150-feet of the property. Similar materials must be the same basic group, such as masonry, stone, or stucco, but do not need to be the same color, brand, or style. Compliance with any streetscape provisions, such as historic lighting and furniture, count as one item towards this requirement. In Old Town, use of brick masonry as a field or accent material may count towards this requirement. ○●○ Split into 3 parts, 3 of 3. Applies only to TND development. Comment from an architect that this would limit good design. This only applies to TND (effectively Old town), where streetscape are almost required. One point right there. Another if brick is used. One material, e.g. stone, stucco, or metal, should really not be a big deal??? Hard to imagine not having a similiar material within 150-feet. TND almost always share somecohesive design similiarities, even new. Original guideline could arguably be used to require much more. B-2.1.3.3.3. G 1.30 Incorporate design principles to include rhythm, repetition, framing, and/or proportion. Applies to all sides of a building façade facing public roadways, visible from residential neighborhood or public spaces, or facing the public entry of an adjacent building. ●●●B-2.1.3.2. Use fundamental design principles, including, but not limited to, composition, order, balance, rhythm, repetition, proportion, and scale to create a unified building design. Split into 3 parts, 1 of 3. One goal and two standards. Direction to integrate some design principles with measureable metric. B, C, and D all similar. Merge B-2.1.3.2. S 1.3A Integrate at least one material change, color variation, or horizontal reveal for every 12-vertical feet of building façade; vertical spacing may be averaged over façade. ●●● Split into 3 parts, 2 of 3. Comment that this would be a zebra. Spacing not required to be equal, just averaged, and footings, caps, cornice, fenestration, etc. would all count. Not sure why this would ever be difficult, even on big box. B-2.1.3.2. S 1.3B Integrate at least one material change, color variation, or vertical reveal every 50-horizontal feet of building façade; horizontal spacing may be averaged over façade elevation. ●●●Split into 3 parts, 3 of 3.B-2.1.3.2. I 2.00 Promote building designs that use appropriate architectural and pedestrian scales to establish compatible physical and visual relationships with adjacent and surrounding developments and reinforce a cohesive built environment. ●●●B-2.2.1.1. To encourage building designs that use appropriate architectural and human scales to establish compatible physical and visual relationships with adjacent and surrounding developments and reinforce a cohesive urban environment. Revisions cover all similar goals C-2.2.1.1 G 2.10 Development should consider the scale of surrounding buildings, including relationships to existing residential areas, as well as an appropriate height, mass, and form scaled for the built environment. Applies to façades of development along public roads, public spaces, and adjacent to residential areas. ●●●C- 2.2.2.2.1. Development should consider the scale of surrounding buildings, including relationships to residential areas, as well as an appropriate scale for a transitional built environment. Complaint on this. Just a goal though, and more restricted to certain applications than currently adopted text. Same as D, similar to portion of B.. S 2.1A Buildings with rooflines 50-feet in length or greater must incorporate roofline and parapet variations. Variations may include step-downs, step-backs, other modulation, or architectural features such as cornices, ledges, or columns, and must occur in total combination for at least 20% of the façade length. May be averaged over entire façade, but may not exceed 75-feet without a break. ●●●C- 2.2.2.1.2. Large-scale and multi-building developments are encouraged to produce innovative and creative designs that visually reduce the mass, size, and box form to promote an aesthetic appearance on appropriate façades. C and D S 2.1B For buildings with façades longer than 200-feet, reduce massing of buildings by grouping or incorporating smaller tenant spaces along the commercial façade, or by incorporating at least one significant modulation whose depth is at least 3% of the total façade length or 10-feet, and whose width in combination is at least 20% of the façade length. ●●○C- 2.2.2.1.3. Where possible, group or incorporate smaller uses along façades that introduce modulation and create pedestrian environments that break up massing of large-scale buildings. Comment that this should be form-based code, and that this does not necessarily guarantee good design. It does not, by itself, but it does work in concert with other requirements like material, architectural elements, fenestration, etc.. Form based code (which staff supports), would require a UDC overhaul, and does not meet intent of project (to be measureable). Seems like something that needs to be identified and at least encouraged early…?D-2.2.2.1.3. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)2 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S 2.1C Within Old Town, building designs must provide a building scale of two or more stories at least 25-feet in height along roadways. ○●○B-2.2.2.2. Building designs should provide a building scale of two or more stories at least 35 feet in height along roadways to encourage an urban character with contiguous street walls. The UDC is very clear that buildings must be two-stories. The minimum height is an attempt to more easily allow larger single story buildings such as gymnasiums, churches, and venue locations without a second story, but which have tall single stories. Current requirements state 2-story without any exception, and this is intended to ease that without taking liberties with code. S 2.1D Within mixed use areas and for all developments along arterial roadways, buildings over 1,000 sqft must provide a minimum 20-foot building elevation to include average parapet height, ridge of a pitched roof, or tower/turret type elements at least 20% in total of overall façade width. ●●●C- 2.2.2.2.4. Building scales along roadways and adjacent to or near urban areas of the community are encouraged to develop a minimum two-story design character. Comment that this is restrictive. It's already less than the typical design elevation on new arterial developments. Not applicable to smaller roadways. Intent for 90% of projects, the other 10% with good intentions have option for "design standards exemption" G 2.20 Physically configure building designs to reduce disproportioned architectural scale relative to adjacent uses. Applies to façades of development along public roads, public spaces, and residential areas. ●●○B- 2.2.2.1.2. Physically configure building designs, as appropriate, to reduce overwhelming and disproportioned architectural scale relative to adjacent uses. Development should consider the scale of surrounding buildings in addition to the proposed scale of the anticipated urban environment. Split into 3 parts, 1 of 3. One goal and two standards. More open ended, but provided specific examples. Not sure if its "express" enough? I do think its closer to heart of original guideline. Similar to others. C-2.2.2.2.1. S 2.2A For adjacent buildings with greater than 1-story height disparity (i.e. – two or more stories difference) and within 30-feet of each other, integrate and align parapet designs, material changes, fenestration alignment, material reveals, or other architectural elements and horizontal articulation, to relate varying building heights to one another. Aligned features do not have to be the same type (i.e. window pattern on one could align with parapet on another). ●●○ Split into 3 parts, 2 of 3. Comment that this may not do much. Only for buildings that are two or more stories, shorter or taller, and very flexible in what elements align. Doesn't have to literally line up feature to feature. C-2.2.2.2.1. S 2.2B Use pedestrian scale and landscape design elements such as specialty lighting, awnings, trees or other site elements to visually relate and transition multi-story buildings (or equivalent) to the ground plane. ●●○Split into 3 parts, 3 of 3.C-2.2.2.2.1. G 2.30 Incorporate pedestrian-scale architectural features to support an aesthetic character that contributes to the quality of the building design and connectivity with the surrounding environment. Applies to façades: in development visible from arterial or collector roadways, adjacent to residential developments facing roadways, facing an adjacent buildings primary building entries, and adjacent to public spaces. ●●●B-2.2.2.3. Incorporate human scale on appropriate building façades to support an aesthetic architectural character that contributes to the quality of the building design, adjacent buildings and public spaces, and the surrounding urban character. B, C, and D similar. Merged.E-2.2.2.4. S 2.3A Consistently incorporate at least two (2) architectural features into the building design that are pedestrian scale, to include: fenestration patterns, architectural elements such as ledges, lighting, or canopies, material or pattern banding, or detailing (see Pedestrian Scale definition). ●●●B- 2.2.2.3.1. Use human scale to emphasize fenestration patterns, architectural elements, proportion, materials, and detailing throughout the façade and building design. Added definition reference, which describes area these are Very similar to B-2.1.3.3.2 which seems redundant with this, which is in a more appropriate location (building scale) @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)3 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref G 2.40 Along local or collector roadways and within Traditional Neighborhood Districts, maintain relative consistency of building scales along roadways and blocks to promote the development of cohesive urban areas. ○●○B- 2.2.2.1.4. Where appropriate, maintain relative consistency for building scales along roadways and among blocks to promote the development of cohesive urban areas and provide opportunities to create “districts” within urban environments. Split into 3 parts, 1 of 3. Reverted to similar text as DM guideline, as a goal. Added specific locations and text for different conditions. Less about actual building height as setbacks and pedestrian environment (easier). B-2.2.2.1.4. S 2.4A For buildings fronting local and collector roadways, off street parking must be located to the side of or behind buildings; off street parking is not allowed between the roadway and building. ○●○Split into 3 parts, 2 of 3.B-2.2.2.1.4. S 2.4B Limit building separation from the roadway to streetscape and pedestrian supportive use areas, such as locations for street furnishings, outdoor dining, small plazas, public spaces, or store fronts. ○●○Split into 3 parts, 3 of 3.B-2.2.2.1.4. I 3.00 Promote building designs that articulate and define appropriate building forms with visual interest and enhance the character of the built environment. ●●●B-2.3.1.1. To encourage building designs that articulate and define appropriate building forms to enhance the character of urban environment and promote architectural vitality. Similar elsewhere C-2.3.1.1. G 3.10 Articulate building forms, including but not limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of aesthetic building designs. Applies to façades in: developments along arterial and collector roadways, adjacent to residential developments facing roadways, facing public entries of adjacent buildings, and visible from public spaces. ●●●B-2.3.2.1. Articulate building forms, including, but not limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of visually aesthetic building designs. S 3.1A Incorporate at least one type of the following modulations in the façade plane, including, but not limited to: projections, recesses, and step backs that articulate wall planes and break up building mass. Examples include but are not limited to: columns with trim or accent materials, change in finished material depths, building overhangs, and inset features and materials such as false windows or fenestration with architectural accents. ●●●11-3A- 19A.1a façades: Building façades visible from a public street or public space shall incorporate modulations in the façade, including, but not limited to, projections, recesses, and step backs that articulate wall planes and break up building mass. façades shall be modulated and articulated in accord with the "City Of Meridian Design Manual". S 3.1B Qualifying modulation must be at least 6-inches in depth, be at least 8-inches in width or height (whichever is narrowest), and occur in total for 20% of overall façade elevation. For buildings with façades less than 150-feet, horizontal modulation must occur no less than every 30- feet. For buildings with façades greater than or equal to 150-feet, horizontal modulation must occur no less than every 50-feet. ●●●11-3A- 19A.1a Comment that this "eliminates any options for creative resolution of massing and modulation by forcing untested limits". This allows modulation to be grouped or spreadout, and only sets generous limits to prevent blank walls relative to the size of the building. Existing approved building elevations were reviewed and used to set minimum values. Exceptions may be allowed for trully creative solutions - this is set to establish a bare minimum. This is a new item. Split UDC code into two S 3.1C Design parking structure façades as site integrated buildings, meeting applicable Manual standards for Architectural Elements and Material sections. ●●○B- 2.3.2.1.2. Design parking structures as integrated buildings that are compatible with surrounding uses and contribute to the urban form. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)4 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref G 3.20 Incorporate visual and physical distinctions in the building design that enhance building forms, articulate façades, identify entries, integrate pedestrian scale, and to visually anchor the building to the ground or street level. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public spaces, and façades with public entries. ●●●C-2.3.2.2. Incorporate visual and physical distinctions in the building design that enhance building forms, articulate façades, identify entries, and integrate human scale. B, C, and D. Merged here as non-downtown version. B changed to focus on multiple building floors B-2.3.2.2. S 3.2A For at least 30% of applicable façades use any combination of concrete, masonry, stone, or unique variation of color, texture, or material, at least 10-inches in height, around the base of the building. May alternatively incorporate other architectural features such as ledges, façade reveals, ground level fenestration, raised planters, or landscaping elements within 3-feet of finished grade. ●●●B- 2.3.2.2.2. Design lower stories to visually anchor buildings to the ground or street and appropriately integrate architectural elements and details that emphasize pedestrian scale. Exists in B, C, and D S 3.2B Where building designs incorporate multiple stories, or multiple floor height equivalents, integrate at least one field or accent color, material, or architectural feature used on lower stories, on the upper stories. ●●●C- 2.3.2.2.2. Where building designs incorporate multiple stories, or equivalent building heights, design upper stories to complement lower stories and create a cohesive building design. C and D. I like how this was broken up separately. The ones in B is combined and harder to track.C-2.3.2.2.2. S 3.2C Building designs with multiple stories must provide proportionally taller ground-level façades adjacent to public roadways and public spaces. Provide floor-to- ceiling heights, or floor-to-floor from 10 to 16 feet. ●●●D-2.3.2.4. Where multiple stories are proposed, building designs should provide proportionally taller ground-level façades adjacent to pedestrian environments, roadways, and public spaces. Provide floor-to-ceiling heights, or floor-to- floor from 10 to 16 feet. Removed the more restrictive version of this for mixed use. This one applies to all now. Similar to B and C. KEEP THIS ONE FOR VANILLA COMMERCIAL, and the one in B FOR MIXED USE.B-2.3.2.4. S 3.2D In mixed-use areas and for structures greater than four stories, design the uppermost story or façade wall plane to include material changes, horizontal articulation, and modulation meeting first story requirements, or include a patio, rooftop garden, penthouse, or strong architectural feature such as a tower element. ●●○B- 2.3.2.2.4. Design the uppermost story or façade wall planes to complete the building design. Use articulation, architectural elements, materials, and details to emphasize the termination of walls, roof planes or rooftop elements, such as a patio, garden or penthouse. G 3.30 Building design should establish visual connections that relate internal spaces at ground- or street-level with facades adjacent to public roadways, public spaces, and along primary building entries, and that add visual interest and complexity to the first floor building design. ●●●B-2.3.2.3. Building designs should establish visual connections that relate internal spaces at ground- or street-level with adjacent public roadways, public spaces, and pedestrian environments. Multistory buildings should provide more transparency at ground or street level than upper stories. Wordy objective, and seems duplicative with action item. The portion regarding multistory building should probably a separate action? C-2.3.2.3. S 3.3A Use horizontal and/or vertical divisions in wall planes, such as ledges, awnings, recesses, stringcourse, molding, joint lines, or other material types, to frame and accent 30% or more of total fenestration. ●●●B- 2.3.2.2.1. Use horizontal and vertical divisions in wall planes to organize fenestration as integrated elements of façade compositions, provide visual interest and complexity to the building design, and emphasize architectural elements. Different color paint is not a division in the wall plane. Needs actual modulation through material or other techniques, such as those listed. Similar to, and functionally the same as, C-2.3.2.2.3. S 3.3B Within Old Town, average 50% fenestration along first floor façade facing roadways and public spaces. May also meet fenestration alternative for up to half of required area. Buildings with façades fronting multiple streets may meet Fenestration Alternative for other façades (see 3.3E). ○●○B- 2.3.2.3.2. Façades at ground level should average 50 percent transparency along roadways and adjacent to public spaces. Value seems a little arbitrary. Exists in C and D with lesser values.C-2.3.2.3.2. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)5 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S 3.3C Within mixed-use areas, average 40% fenestration along applicable first floor façade. May also meet fenestration alternative at 40% (see 3.3E). For façades facing roadways that are not public entryways, may meet Fenestration Alternative (see 3.3E). Big box may limit applicable façade area to 30-feet around public pedestrian entries. ○●○C- 2.3.2.3.2. Façades at ground level should average 40 percent transparency along roadways and adjacent to public spaces. Uncomfortable with big box exception.Value seems a little arbitrary. Only need once - tweak for each new category B-2.3.2.3.2. S 3.3D Average 30% fenestration for applicable first floor façade, unless specified elsewhere. May also meet fenestration alternative (see 3.3E). Big box and buildings in industrial districts may limit applicable façade area to 30-feet around public entries. ●○●D- 2.3.2.3.2. Façades at ground level should average 30 percent transparency along roadways and adjacent to public spaces. Uncomfortable with big box exception. Not sure what makes them special. While most new construction big box has met Design Manual guidelines, some have not. Some older product is downright terrible (and scary). Value seems a little arbitrary. Exists elsewhere with other values B-2.3.2.3.2. S 3.3E Fenestration Alternative: Incorporate doors and windows for at least 30% of applicable first floor façade, or suggest their inclusion using faux treatments that incorporate at least two of the following: material changes, reveals in conjunction with color or material change, qualifying modulation such as recessed areas, architectural trellis, awnings and canopies over access areas, detached structures such as pergola, or similar architectural features and details. ●●●B- 2.3.2.3.1. Use architectural elements, such as doors and windows, details, and materials, to articulate building façades that face roadways, or are adjacent to public spaces and pedestrian environments to establish a transparent relationship between active indoor and outdoor spaces. Wordy, and exists in B,C, and D. Doors, windows, and "materials" isn't exactly revolutionary or specific. G 3.40 Building roof types, forms, and elements should provide variation and interest to building profiles and contribute to the architectural identity of the buildings, without creating an imposing scale on adjacent uses. Applies to façades: in development along arterial roadways, visible from residential development, adjacent to public spaces, facing public entries of adjacent buildings. ●●●B-2.3.2.5. Building roof types, forms, and elements should provide variation and interest to building profiles and contribute to the architectural identity of buildings without imposing overwhelming scale on adjacent uses. Went back to more of the original text.B, C, and D C-2.3.2.5. S 3.4A For flat roofs, incorporate primary and secondary roof elements including but not limited to: multiple material types along parapets, multiple parapet elevations with at least 1-foot change in elevation, or modulation of at least 2-feet in the parapet, such as along entryway overhangs. Qualifying elements must exist for at least 20% the length of applicable façades. May also incorporate secondary roofs types, such as hip roofs along overhangs. ●●●B- 2.3.2.5.1. Building designs should incorporate appropriate roof forms with primary and secondary roof elements that complement the building form and façade designs and help reduce the appearance of building mass and scale. Split into 2 parts, 1 of 2. Flat roofs. Break this up into several pieces and better define intent with examples.B, C, and D B-2.3.2.5.1. S 3.4B For sloped roofs, incorporate at least two of any one roof element, including but not limited to: valleys, ridges, or gables. Qualifying elements in total must exist for at least 20% of applicable façade roof area and be visible from the same façade elevation. May also incorporate other roof styles, such as parapet walls over entryway features. ●●● Split into 2 parts, 2 of 2. Sloped roofs. Comment that complex roofs don't necessarily look more interesting. That's totally true, but this only requires 2 of 1 element. Slight revision to make clearer that its not do two of all. Design exception is always an option if they can show how a single visible ridge with one flat slope, would be interesting with overall building design. Meant to protect the bare minimum. B-2.3.2.5.1. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)6 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S 3.4C Provide variation in roof profile over façade modulation and/or articulation over façade material/color transitions. Options include, but are not limited to: varying parapet heights; two or more roof planes; continuation of façade modulation through roof lines, dormers; lookout; overhang eaves; sloped roofs; or cornice work. ●●○B- 2.3.2.5.2. Where appropriate, modulate and/or articulate roof types, both flat and sloped, with roof elements, including, but not limited to, parapets, dormers, overhangs, and eaves, architectural detailing, and cornice work. Exists in B,C, and D. Left 11-3A-19A for residential C-2.3.2.5.2. I 4.00 Promote integrated architectural elements and details as components of cohesive building designs that enhance the visual interest of building façades, support activity at and/or near ground level, and provide pedestrian scale. ●●●B-2.4.1.1. To integrate architectural elements and details as components of cohesive building designs that enhance the visual interest of building façades, support urban activity at and/or near ground level, and provide human and pedestrian scale. B, C, and D similar. Merge C-2.4.1.1. G 4.10 Use proportional architectural elements and detailing to articulate façades, and contribute to an aesthetic building character with a high level of pedestrian design. Applies to façades: in development along public roadways, visible from residential development, adjacent to public spaces, facing public entries of adjacent buildings. ●●●B-2.4.2.1. Use architectural elements and detailing, including, but not limited to, fenestration patterns, awnings, canopies, balconies, arcades, atriums, porticos, colonnades, entries, materials, and decorative or ornamental detailing, to articulate façades, and contribute to an aesthetic building character. Similar to C-2.4.2.1. and D. Merged C-2.4.2.1. G 4.11 Design and articulate architectural elements using proportions, divisions, detailing, materials, textures, and colors and appropriately integrate these elements into the building design. Applies to façades: in development along public roadways, visible from residential development, adjacent to public spaces, facing public entries of adjacent buildings. ●●●B- 2.4.2.1.1. Design and articulate architectural elements using proportions, divisions, detailing, materials, textures, and colors and appropriately integrate these elements into the building design. Similar to and functionally exists in all. This wording is better.C-2.4.2.1.1. S 4.1A Provide at least three detailing elements that transition façade material changes or integrate pedestrian scale elements, such as doorways, windows, or material banding, at the base of the building. Examples include but are not limited to: cornice work around primary entries, decorative caps on brick or stone banding, architectural canopies over entries, or decorative lintels above the first floor windows. ●●○B- 2.4.2.1.2. Provide architectural elements and detailing that emphasize human scale throughout the building design. Pedestrian scale that uses a high level of design and detailing is required at ground level adjacent to roadways and public spaces. Functionally same in all except E. Merge C-2.4.2.1.2. S 4.1B Provide building overhangs or other projections such as canopies which articulate the building façade and provide temporary relief from inclement weather. At a minimum, an overhang or projection is required within 20-feet of all public entryways, must be at least 3-feet in depth from the point of entry, and be least 6-feet in length. Entryways with vestibules or other permanent enclosed transition space are exempt. ●●●B- 2.4.2.1.3. Incorporate building overhangs or other similar features, such as canopies and awnings, which offer temporary relief from inclement weather along portions of façades that adjoin pedestrian environments. Projections into right-of-ways should comply with the standards in the UDC. This is in part, an existing UDC requirement as well: 11- 3A-19-4. Trying to blend that with the original Design Manual guideline, to serve both an aesthetic and functional purpose, and also be measureable. Each should have, not just within 20-feet though…(current code) Reference to UDC applies to everything…? Merge C-2.4.2.1.3. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)7 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S 4.1C Provide details that emphasize focal elements such as public entries, building corners, or public spaces. Examples include but are not limited to: columns, quoin or rustication, canopies over entries, lintels, transom windows, or modulation of the roof plane. At least one focal element is required and must be accented with a unique combination of color, texture, materials, or modulation in the wall or roof plane. ●●○B- 2.4.2.1.4. Integrate strategically located elements as focal points in building designs at entries, building corners, or at other visually prominent locations. Focal elements should be proportional to the building scale and emphasize building corners, entries, adjacent public spaces, or other such features to enhance urban and pedestrian environments. Some of this is covered elsewhere, and worded better. Changed to reflect C/D. E is similar, but lighter on text. Merge G 4.20 Building designs must not create blank wall segments when visible from a public street or public spaces. Consider the treatment at the base, middle, and top of the façade. ●●●B-2.4.2.2. Use architectural elements and detailing in combination with color palettes, textural changes, and material combinations to mitigate the stark appearance of blank walls. Building designs should not create blank wall segments along roadways or adjacent to public space. Landscaping techniques may also be considered. Too specific for a goal. See standard below. Merged ideas from all categories, including residential. This seems appropriate and allows for options that are not just windows. S 4.2A Use any combination of standards from Building Form, Architectural Elements, or Material sections to provide pattern, color, or material variation on all wall segments. Must not exceed 30-feet horizontally or vertically without building variation. ●●●11-3A- 19A.1d Pattern Variations: Architectural building design shall not create blank wall segments along public streets and/or adjacent public spaces. Architectural elements, including, but not limited to, windows, awnings and arcades, shall have color, texture and/or materials to mitigate blank walls. Revised with goal above. G 4.30 Organize building service equipment, including, but not limited to, utility, service, and mechanical, away from building entries, roadways, public spaces, and, where appropriate, from adjacent buildings. ●●●B-2.4.2.3. Organize and locate building service equipment, including, but not limited to, mechanical units, flutes, and vents, away from building entries, roadways, public spaces, and, where appropriate, from adjacent buildings. Just a goal. The specific standards are more towards screening regardless of where (per UDC)Functionally identical to C and D.C-2.4.2.3. S 4.3A Use and integrate standards from the Architectural Standards Manual to screen and conceal service and mechanical equipment. Landscaping meeting the same intent may also be considered for utility meters and connections. ●●●B- 2.4.2.3.1. Use integrated architectural elements to provide adequate screening and appropriately conceal service equipment and areas. Combined with B-2.4.2.3.4. Original exists in B, C, and D. S 4.3B All ground level mechanical equipment must be screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property line.●●●B- 2.4.2.3.2. Screen service equipment at ground level from pedestrian and vehicular view to a minimum height of the equipment on all sides and integrated with the building design and site layout. Functionally same as C-2.4.2.3.2. Exists in B, C, and D. S 4.3C All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened as viewed from the farthest edge of the adjoining right of way. ●●●B- 2.4.2.3.3. Screen service and building equipment that is attached or on top of structures from public view. Use pedestrian lines of sight from the farthest edge of adjoining right-of-way to determine the height and effectiveness of screening. Functionally same as C-2.4.2.3.3.. Exists in B, C, and D. I 5.00 Use quality materials and colors that promote aesthetic building designs and contribute to the development of a timeless community character. ●●●B-2.5.1.1. To encourage the use of quality materials that promote aesthetic building designs and appropriate contributions to the development of a timeless urban character. Similar all but residential. Merge C-2.5.1.1. G 5.10 Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design. Use materials from the following basic groups: wood, masonry, concrete, stucco, metal, and glazing. ●●●B-2.5.2.2. Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design. Use materials from the following basic groups: wood, masonry, concrete, metal, and glazing. Exists in all categories.C-2.5.2.2. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)8 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S 5.1A For buildings with façades that face multiple public roadways and/or public spaces, use consistent material combinations, material quality, and architectural detailing. ●●●B-2.5.2.1. Buildings with façades that face multiple roadways and/or public spaces should use consistent material combinations, quality, and detailing to unify the building design. I don't understand this. Is this referring to different buildings looking similar? Exists in all categories.C-2.5.2.1. S 5.1B For all façade elevations visible from public roads, public spaces, primary entrance(s) of an adjacent building, and facing residential districts, use at least two distinct field materials, colors, or material-color combinations on the building façade (see also Material definitions). ●●○B- 2.5.2.2.4. Create interest and variety in façade design to establish attractive architectural character and pedestrian scale. Split into 2 parts, 1 of 2. One industrial and one not.Functionally same in all but residential, only difference is ped vs. human scale.C-2.5.2.2.4. S 5.1C For all façade elevations in industrial districts along arterial and collector roads or facing public spaces, use at least two distinct field materials, colors, or material-color combinations on the building façade (see also Material definitions). ○○● Split into 2 parts, 2 of 2. Split from 5.1B, which no longer applies to industrial. This one applies to industrial only. Unlike 5.1B, this is only for façades along roadways, and not necessarily visible from (e.g. - interior buildings). Landscape buffers, screening of storage areas, and other "site" requirements per UDC would still be required. B-2.5.2.2.4. S 5.1D For façade elevations visible from public roadways and along primary building entryways, incorporate an accent material on the first story. ●●●B- 2.5.2.2.1. Select a combination that emphasize a finished composition and enhance human scale for lower stories and pedestrian scale at ground level. Exists in all categories but residential C-2.5.2.2.1. S 5.1E Distinguish field materials from accent materials through pattern, texture, or additional detail visible from edge of nearest roadway. Alternate masonry or material courses with relief from primary plane may count towards this. ●●●B- 2.5.2.2.5. Provide pattern, texture, and detail in the building design and distinguish field materials from accent materials.Exists in all categories. Residential has some extra detail C-2.5.2.2.5. S 5.1F Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. For example, wrap stone or stone-like products around visible corners to convey the appearance of mass, and not as a thin veneer. ●●●B-2.5.2.3. Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. (For example, stone or stone-like products should convey the appearance of mass and should not appear as a thin veneer.) Functionally same in all categories C-2.5.2.3. S 5.1G Non-durable materials, treatments, and finishes that deteriorate quickly with weather, ultra-violet light, and that are more susceptible to wear and tear are prohibited on permanent structures. ●●●B- 2.5.2.2.3. Use well-detailed, proportioned, and durable materials that will weather and age gracefully, adding to the architectural character over time. Avoid non-durable materials that deteriorate quickly and require frequent maintenance or replacement. Some of this really should be implied? Addressed in all categories C-2.5.2.2.3. S 5.1H The use of vinyl and ordinary smooth face block, unfinished, colored, or painted, are prohibited as a field materials for building façades along public roadways, adjacent to public spaces, and when visible from residential neighborhoods. Smooth face block may be used as an accent material. ●●●B- 2.5.2.2.2. Concrete masonry that provides texture, interest, and detail may be appropriate for building designs; however, the use of ordinary, smooth face block, unfinished, colored or painted, is not an acceptable finish material for building façades along roadways, adjacent to public spaces, and residential areas. Split into 3 parts to make better allowances, especially for Industrial considerations. Keep in mind that UDC currently disallows. Already said concrete is allowed - this just needs to disallow a specific type. Colored is colored, doesn't matter if its painted or integral. Exists in all categories but residential C-2.5.2.2.2. S 5.1I Untextured concrete panels and prefabricated steel panels are prohibited as field materials for building façades, except when used with a minimum of two other qualifying field materials and meeting all other standard fenestration and material requirements. ●●○11-3A- 19A.2c Untextured concrete panels are prohibited as finish and/or accent materials. (Ord. 09-1394, 3-3-2009, eff. retroactive to 2-4-2009) Split into 3 parts. From UDC (was previously integrated into new standard). Materials. What's the story with this? Why prohibit as accent?C-2.5.2.2.2. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)9 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S 5.1J In Industrial Districts, untextured concrete panels and prefabricated steel panels are prohibited as facade field materials facing arterial and collector roadways, or public spaces, except when used with a minimum of two other qualifying field materials and meeting standard fenestration requirements. Concrete panels that do not exceed three (3) SQFT without a patterned reveal or modulation break may be considered textured. ○○●11-3A- 19A.2c Split into 3 parts to make better allowances, especially for Industrial considerations. Keep in mind that UDC currently disallows. Allow use of these materials for industrial, without other materials, when not located on arterial/collector roadways. Upgraded materials on façades facing roadways still need to transition though. C-2.5.2.2.2. G 5.20 Use colors that complement building materials and support innovative and good design practices. Applies to building façades visible from a public street, public spaces, and pedestrian environments. ●●●B-2.5.2.4.Use colors that complement the use of building materials and support innovative and good design practices.Functionally same in all categories C-2.5.2.4. S 5.2A Use of subtle, neutral, or natural tones must be integrated with at least one accent or field material.●●●B- 2.5.2.4.1. The use of subtle, neutral, and natural tones for field materials should complement accent colors and materials. The use of deep earth tones or saturated colors to distinguish building façades should enhance the building design and be compatible with adjacent structures. See material definitions. This isn't "reasonably" measureable per say, but neither are some of the City's lighting requirements. A 20% shift in L, A, or B on the RGB/CIELAB color space can be defined. Peer review is always an option if developer/planner disagree. Functionally same in all categories C-2.5.2.4.1. S 5.2B Use of intensely saturated colors or fluorescence is prohibited as a primary material. May be used as an accent material. ●●●B- 2.5.2.4.2. The use of intensely bright and fluorescent colors, as well as the widespread use of saturated hues without complementary colors, materials, and accents, is discouraged. See definitions. Saturated colors can be defined, as can fluorescence (which absorb and then emits light). Hard to know what original intent was with this, as "complementary" for an obnoxious color, is another obnoxious color. Term was used incorrectly. Functionally same in all categories. "Complementary" in the context of color does not mean compliment. S 5.2C Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as some metals or reflective glazing, must not redirect light towards roadways, public spaces, or adjacent uses in a way which constitutes a public nuisance or safety hazard. ●●●B- 2.5.2.4.3. Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as metal or reflective glazing, should be reviewed and evaluated with the Planning staff to minimize glare on roadways, public spaces, and adjacent uses and to determine appropriateness. Not super measureable, but the intent is only to prohibit a safety hazard and to not blind kids on the playground. Architect and/or engineer is acknowledging it does not (or verify with a lighting specialist/product manufacturer), by checking this. Functionally same in all categories. This makes it sound like planning staff are the design professionals, which is not the case. Staffs confirm compliance, not design. C-2.5.2.4.3. G 5.30 Integrate roll-up doors, will call doors, drive through doors, and loading docks into the building design, and locate them in a manner which does not create pedestrian, drive aisle, or roadway conflicts. Applies to façades along arterial and collector roadways, and façades facing public spaces. ●●●This is entirely new. Discuss with Council. S 5.3A For commercial and traditional neighborhood districts, roll- up and drive through doors are allowed when integrated into the building design, but will call doors with roll ups and loading docks are prohibited. Consider material variation and transitions, modulation, and other architectural features and standards for the design. ●●○This is entirely new. Discuss with Council. S 5.3B For industrial district properties, will call and roll-up doors are allowed when integrated into the building design, but loading docks are prohibited. Consider material variation, transitions, modulation, and other architectural features and standards for the design. ○○●This is entirely new. Discuss with Council. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)10 of 11 Architectural Standards | Non-Residential @ ID #Current Revision CD TND IND Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref I 6.00 Integrate signs and architectural lighting as cohesive elements of building designs that contribute to the atmosphere of the built environments and enhance safety. ●●●B-2.6.2.1. To encourage the use of signs and architectural lighting as integrated elements of building designs that contribute to the atmosphere of urban environments and enhance the pedestrian experience. Exists in all categories but residential C2.6.2.1. G 6.10 Use lighting on building exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environments along roadways, at intersections, and in public spaces. ●●●B-2.6.3.1. Where appropriate, use lighting on building exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environments along roadways, at intersections, and in public spaces. Exists in all categories but residential C-2.6.3.1. S 6.1A Lighting fixture spacing and height along streetscapes and roadways must be placed to avoid conflicts with tree plantings. ●●●B- 2.6.3.1.1. Coordinate lighting fixture spacing and height along streetscapes and roadways to avoid conflicts with tree plantings. Exists in all categories but residential C-2.6.3.1.1. S 6.1B Use energy-efficient architectural lighting.●●●B- 2.6.3.1.2. The use of architectural lighting is encouraged to be energy-efficient and easily maintained, in addition to providing attractive qualities to building character and public spaces. Note: Meridian's historical lighting is not available with glass in energy efficient varieties. Not necessarily a building quality or form item, either Exists in all categories but residential C-2.6.3.1.2. S 6.1C Use lighting fixtures that are consistent with other decorative hardware on the building. For example, select lighting hardware with similar color and shape as other building hardware, use recessed lighting, incorporate uniform spacing, integrate with other accents and reveals, and coordinate specialty lights with predominate architectural features. ●●●B- 2.6.3.1.3. Lighting fixtures used on building exteriors should be integrated with building design and coordinate with architectural elements and building entries. Exists in all categories but residential C-2.6.3.1.3. G 6.20 Signs should be integrated with architectural features and complement the building design and materials. Relate the size, shape, materials, details, and illumination to a pedestrian scale in mixed-use environments. See City of Meridian Unified Development Code for other sign requirements. ○●○B-2.6.3.2. Signs in urban environments are typically attached to building façades as buildings are brought up close to roadways and public spaces. Therefore, signs should complement building designs and be integral with architectural elements and materials. The City of Meridian Unified Development Code regulates all of the important sign types, sizes, and other requirements. This is just some extra stuff from the original Design Manual, relating to the look and feel aesthetics. Why is this written like an argument in a debate? Similar to C and D, without the debate. Merged.C-2.6.3.2. S 6.2A Within traditional neighborhood districts, integrate hanging or projecting signs in pedestrian oriented areas.○●○B- 2.6.3.2.1. Provide signs to identify individual storefronts, buildings and uses along roadways, and pedestrian walkways. Avoid large, single signs with multiple tenants. Signs stay or go to UDC? Some of these are much more specific than UDC, and very much part of the "building" design. Not much in Comp Plan. Change to reflect all categories and be generic if kept. Similar to B, C, and D. Merged C-2.6.3.2.1. S 6.2B Use signs that are proportional to the mounted and visible building façade plane. Provide modulation, material variations, or integrate architectural features to accentuate and frame signs that are not hanging or projecting. ○●○B- 2.6.3.2.3. Use appropriately scaled signs that are compatible with the architectural character and design of the building. Merged several. Removed logo as addressed in other item.C-2.6.3.2.3. S 6.2C Use sign types such as, wall, window, door, awning, hanging, and projecting, to enhance urban character. Non- portable freestanding, box, and pole signs are not allowed. ○●○B- 2.6.3.2.4. Use sign types, such as, wall, window, awning, projecting, under canopy, door and parapet, to enhance urban character. Avoid freestanding, box, and pole signs. UDC should cover this by zoning? @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: CD=Commercial, TND=Traditional, IND=Industrial | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)11 of 11 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref B-1.1 Coherent Plan Urban SC CP Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-1.1.2.1.To encourage the creation, enhancement, and evolution of compatible urban and mixed-use developments that promote functional, integrated, and attractive built environments.Urban SC CP B-1.1.3.1.Development should contribute to the anticipated urban form and character and enhance the existing urban environment as appropriate.Urban SC CP B-1.1.3.1.1. Emphasize a compatible mix of uses, including retail, commercial, office, residential, civic, cultural, and educational, that support functional, attractive, and livable urban neighborhoods, districts and activity centers. Urban SC CP UDC does not require mixed use. Comp Plan addresses. B-1.1.3.1.2. Relate proposed development, including land uses and activities, to adjacent and surrounding uses and public spaces as appropriate to maintain compatibility and establish the continuity of the planned urban form and character. Urban SC CP B-1.1.3.2.Anticipate the addition of future transit systems to the transportation network and plan for the integration of appropriate transit facilities and infrastructure. Urban SC CP Allowed to count as an amenity in UDC 11-3C-3C. B-1.1.3.2.1.Coordinate routes, placement of facilities, and infrastructure improvements with the appropriate transportation authorities and any adopted or accepted long-range plans.Urban SC CP Exists in all sections. Referenced in UDC 11-6A-7G.4 C-1.1.3.2.1. B-1.1.3.3. Appropriately address the critical issues of site layout that influence urban development character, including, but not limited to, street networks and patterns, block configurations, vehicular access, pedestrian connectivity, building orientation and site layout, parking, and public spaces. Urban SC CP B-1.2 Street Networks Urban SC SN Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-1.2.2.1.To establish a foundational framework, with suitable urban street patterns, that encourages the development of functional, attractive, and integrated urban environments.Urban SC SN Need reduced buffers in urban core. Some conflicts in UDC. B-1.2.3.1.Use an appropriate urban development pattern, such as a grid, grid and squares, radial, web or other combination of geometric forms, as a framework for street networks and block configurations.Urban SC SN Urban circulation system is already defined (TMISAP TOD), or already exists (downtown). Discussed with TN-R and possibly PD. B-1.2.3.1.1.Development proposals in the Downtown District and Old Town should extend the use of a grid pattern.Urban SC SN Downtown Circulation system already exists. Merged with part of 1.2.3.3 B-1.2.3.2.11-3A-3 Create street networks using a hierarchy of roadway typologies and classifications consistent with the highway district standards.Urban SC SN Addressed in master street map. B-1.2.3.2.1.Use local, collector, and arterial roadways, as appropriate, to establish an interconnected street network. Coordinate traffic movements and direction with the surrounding roadway pattern.Urban SC SN Addressed in master street map. B-1.2.3.2.2.Where appropriate, preserve or create and use alleys as part of the street network. Alleys allow for internal access to blocks and reduce the need for direct access off roadways. Urban SC SN We allow/encourage, but may need to modify standards. B-1.2.3.3.Establish blocks that are compatible with the urban framework and street network. Where appropriate, enhance or restore existing block configurations.Urban SC SN First sentence exists in 1.2.2.1, and second merged with 1.2.3.1.1. Addressed in master street map. B-1.2.3.3.1.Blocks should generally be square, slightly elongated rectangles, or geometrically shaped (if the urban development pattern used is other than a grid). Urban SC SN Not sure what this is saying. BP and JL agree. B-1.2.3.3.2.Use block configurations that provide relative uniformity in size, spacing, shape, and orientation. Urban SC SN Not sure what this is saying. BP and JL agree. B-1.2.3.3.3.11-2D-6 Generally, blocks should not exceed a length greater than 500 feet along any side; however, greater block lengths may be appropriate on a case-by-case basis after considering the need or purpose of the increased length. Urban SC SN UDC is less restrictive overall, but for TN-R (more urban standards), similar. B-1.3 Access and Connectivity Urban SC AC Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-1.3.2.1. To promote connectivity and accommodate various modes of transportation by establishing contiguous pedestrian environments, integrating accessible transit, and linking urban and public spaces. Urban SC AC Should be addressed in Comp Plan for encouraging integration (not UDC b/w required). B-1.3.2.2.11-3A-19 To mitigate the physical and visual impacts that vehicular accomodations have on the urban form and character, particularly along roadways.Urban SC AC B-1.3.3.1.11-6C-3F, 11-3A-3Limit direct vehicular access off major roadways to maintain the continuity of pedestrian environments, streetscapes, and the urban character. Urban SC AC B-1.3.3.1.1.11-3A-3 Where appropriate, use alleys to provide vehicular access to blocks, sites, and buildings.Urban SC AC I can see this being handled through UDC or here. Building placement and access for infill. Alleys are kind of ignored for primary access - need a stronger arm to prohibit streets like Pine/Main being used for driveways Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)1 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref B-1.3.3.1.2.11-3A-3 The preferred options to provide access are alleys and local roadways. Access from arterial and collector roadways is discouraged.Urban SC AC Merged unique part with 1.3.3.1 B-1.3.3.1.3.11-3A-3 Coordinate access points with adjacent sites and uses to limit interruptions along roadways, streetscapes, and pedestrian environments. Individual building and site access points are discouraged. Urban SC AC This is something that often happens on the architects level I think (could be UDC or DM) . Need a site and grading plan to prevent x-access issues. B-1.3.3.2.Provide pedestrian connections that establish contiguous pedestrian networks throughout the urban environment.Urban SC AC Sub action item is same thing but more specific B-1.3.3.2.1.11-3A-19 Use sidewalks, mid-block passages, on-site pedestrian circulation, alleyways and multiuse corridors to link adjacent uses, including blocks, buildings, public spaces, and parking facilities.Urban SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. We require pathway but might want to add language about sidewalk stubs. Only really addressed for parking lots. B-1.3.3.2.2.11-3A-19 Where appropriate, multiple pedestrian routes should converge on significant urban places, such as transit facilities, parks, plazas, civic buildings, and other public spaces.Urban SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. We require pathway but might want to add language about sidewalk stubs. Only really addressed for parking lots. B-1.3.3.3.Plan for access and connectivity to future transit facilities, including, but not limited to, pullouts, stops, and shelters. Urban SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. Subdivision review can be required with annexation and is considered an amenity in UDC 11-3G. B-1.3.3.3.1.Coordinate with the appropriate agencies and organizations to ensure the successful integration of transit facilities and infrastructure as integrated elements of the urban environment. Urban SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. B-1.3.3.3.2.11-3A-19 Provide adequate pedestrian connections from adjacent public spaces that allow convenient, direct access to transit facilities.Urban SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. Similar in B, C, and D. Revisions is substantial but taken from C/D and seems to apply to urban. We require pathway but might want to add language about sidewalk stubs. C-1.2.3.4.2. B-1.4 Orientation and Layout Urban SC OL Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-1.4.1.1 To ensure that site organization, including, but not limited to, the placement and orientation of buildings, structures, and public spaces, as well as the location and layout of service and parking areas, contributes to the establishment of an appropriate urban form and character. Urban SC OL Similar exists in all. Core? Purpose statement. Update through other UDC changes.C-1.3.1.1. B-1.4.2.1.Locate buildings to establish an appropriate urban form that enhances the character and attractiveness of the building and surrounding uses.Urban SC OL Similar exists in all. Core? Revisions from other section text.C-1.3.2.1. B-1.4.2.1.1. Place building façades at or close to the build-to-lines (property lines and/or setbacks as appropriate in the zoning district and/or streetscape standards) to provide street walls as elements of the urban form. Urban SC OL Downtown/mixed use urban specific. Site / master plans (just UDC) don't do this necessarily. Perfect example is Primary Health in Grammercy. Not what was intended…at all. B-1.4.2.1.2.Orient building façades toward roadways and public spaces to enclose and delineate pedestrian environments and streetscapes. Urban SC OL Downtown/mixed use urban specific. Mostly about specific site/building design, but has implications linked with master plan/larger phased developments. B-1.4.2.1.3.Where appropriate, extend building façades to interior lot lines (and rear setbacks on alleys) to establish a continuous street wall along block lengths. Urban SC OL TOD / Downtown. Does UDC address specifically (O-T)? B-1.4.2.1.4.Use buildings that incorporate articulated façades and architectural elements or integrated public spaces to anchor block corners at intersections.Urban SC OL Functionally same in all sections. Nothing wrong with allowing integrated public spaces for other sections (the different part from C, D, and E)C-1.3.2.1.4. B-1.4.2.2.11-3A-19 Primary building entries for ground level and upper story uses should be oriented to provide access from adjacent roadways and public spaces. Secondary and alternative entries may access buildings and uses from parking areas, parking structures, and other areas with available access to the public. Urban SC OL Mostly about specific site/building design, but has implications linked with master plan/larger phased developments. B-1.4.2.3. Strategically locate public and urban spaces to encourage pedestrian activity, enhance the attractiveness of the community, and create landmarks that add character and identity to urban environments. Urban SC OL Unclear where this fits. Very much part of specific site/building design for urban, but maybe less for suburban B-1.4.2.3.1. Integrate public spaces with street patterns, block configurations, and building placements to establish a network of various urban amenities, including gathering places, open spaces, and streetscapes. Urban SC OL Very much part of specific site/building design for urban. Significantly revised to make architectural guidelines appropriate. B-1.4.2.3.2.Frame urban and public spaces with building façades, enhanced streetscapes, or other appropriate enhancements that create a sense of enclosure and delineate space for the intended activities.Urban SC OL Merged with 1.4.2.3.1 and revised for architectural guidelines. B-1.4.2.3.3. Building façades designed to accommodate courtyards, outdoor seating or dining areas, and other such spaces should coordinate with the streetscape and minimize the setback beyond the build-to- lines to maintain the continuity of the street wall and urban form. Urban SC OL Shortened to work with 1.4.2.3.1 for move to architectural guidelines. B-1.4.2.3.4. Where appropriate, incorporate public space to anchor prominent intersections and street terminuses. Use squares, parks, common greens, plazas, or other suitable urban spaces that serve as destinations within the urban environment. Urban SC OL Significant revision to support previous guidelines and move to architectural guidelines B-1.4.2.4.Place transit facilities adjacent to or near public spaces and/or prominent buildings as integrated urban elements. Urban SC OL This seems excessive and well covered already Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)2 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref B-1.4.2.5.Parking areas within urban environments should not detract from establishing an appropriate urban form and character.Urban SC OL This should be DM I think. It's all integrated for urban stuff. B-1.4.2.5.1.11-3A-19 Place parking primarily behind or to the side of buildings and public spaces and away from block corners and major roadways. Urban SC OL TOD / Downtown B-1.4.2.5.2. Use a parking strategy that includes one or a combination of the following: structured parking, on- street parking, integrated small parking areas, and/or shared parking as an alternative to general surface parking. Urban SC OL I think this often changes when a building is actually designed. You know, come in with a larger or smaller user? B-1.4.2.5.3.Where appropriate and consistent with roadway typologies and classifications, provide on-street parking integrated with adjacent streetscape.Urban SC OL Onstreet parking could be with infill…but I think that's probably unlikely in terms our outside TMISAP/Downtown. B-1.4.2.5.4.Orient parking structures to reserve the area of the ground floor adjacent to roadways for tenant spaces with active uses, such as retail or office. Urban SC OL TOD / Downtown. I don't think this is Comp Plan - very specific and defineable. B-1.4.2.6.11-3A-19 Site services, building utilities, and mechanical equipment should not detract from the attractiveness of the urban environment and should be located to minimize impacts on adjacent uses. Urban SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, D, and E. See utilty coord spreadsheet for thought behind. Some of this is considered with site plans, but finalized and often varies with actual construction.C-1.3.2.6. B-1.4.2.6.1.Place service areas and utilities behind buildings and provide access from internal parking areas and/or alleys.Urban SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, D, and E. See utilty coord spreadsheet for thought behind. Some of this is considered with site plans, but finalized and often varies with actual construction. B-1.4.2.6.2.11-3C-8 Where possible, avoid placing service areas adjacent to roadways, public spaces, or in locations that inhibit pedestrian and vehicle circulation. Urban SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, D, and E. See utilty coord spreadsheet for thought behind. Some of this is considered with site plans, but finalized and often varies with actual construction. B-1.4.2.6.3.Place utility lines underground and away from planting zones whenever possible.Urban SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, D, and E. See utilty coord spreadsheet for thought behind. B-1.4.2.7.Where possible, coordinate the placement of public spaces, parking, buildings, pedestrian environments, and/or site services with adjacent properties to encourage integrated developments.Urban SC OL B, C, and D all similar. UDC? B-1.5 Parking Urban SC PK Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-1.5.2.1 11-3C To incorporate parking as an integrated element of the urban environments and address issues, such as appropriate location for parking, size of parking areas, paving materials, landscaping, and screening, that influence the physical and visual characteristics of parking areas. Urban SC PK Similar in B, C, and D. Merged ideas. This is noted through review as being limited in urban context.C-1.4.2.1. B-1.5.3.1.11-3C Design surface parking as an integrated and attractive element of the urban environment that promotes pedestrian comfort and safety.Urban SC PK B-1.5.3.1.1.11-3C Divide surface parking into smaller, separated modules, and arrange parking to minimize large paving areas. Use pedestrian circulation, landscaping, and/or public space to separate parking areas.Urban SC PK B, C, and D all functionally the same. Merged C-1.4.3.2.1. B-1.5.3.1.2.Coordinate vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns that clearly delineate parking stalls and vehicle travel lanes from pedestrian walkways and adjoining public spaces, including roadways. Urban SC PK This is noted through review as being limited in urban context (not just big lots). B-1.5.3.1.3.11-3C Use trees, landscaping, hardscapes, and architectural elements to provide shade, create interest and human scale for pedestrians, and add aesthetic qualities to parking areas.Urban SC PK First occurrence of this. Keep.C-1.4.3.2.4. B-1.5.3.1.4.11-3C Shade pedestrian walkways and parking, including stalls and drive aisles, with the appropriate type and class of trees, and arrange tree plantings in configurations that will provide shade for at least 50 percent of parking surfaces at mature growth. Urban SC PK Original is far too stringent. Revised to be generic guideline as a good practice. Does not need to be correlated with UDC.C-1.4.3.2.5. B-1.5.3.1.5.Integrate appropriately scaled and distributed lighting to provide a safe and comfortable environment for vehicular and pedestrian use.Urban SC PK Really seems like this should be required or left alone. B-1.5.3.1.6. Screen parking adjacent to public spaces, roadways, and pedestrian walkways with landscaped buffers, low walls, architectural elements, or a combination that provides continuous screening at a height of 3 feet. Additional elements above 3 feet should provide 70 percent transparency. Urban SC PK May incorporate in the UDC parking standards. 3-foot shrubs is easy. What's the intent here? How can "special" entryway corridors just be poorly maintained turf (e.g. - Lowes on Eagle)D-1.4.3.2.7. B-1.5.3.2. Design parking areas, or portions thereof, to accommodate other uses, such as markets, plazas, and other pedestrian-oriented gathering spaces, that temporarily shift focus away from vehicle use and promote pedestrian activity. Urban SC PK First occurrence of this.D-1.4.3.4. B-1.5.3.2.1.Where possible, place parking areas designed to accommodate other uses adjacent to public and urban spaces, and organize the parking area as an extension of the public or urban space. Urban SC PK B-1.5.3.2.2. Combine architectural elements, paving materials, landscaping, plantings, and/or other features to enhance multiuse parking areas and maintain identifiable circulation patterns that delineate vehicle use and parking. Urban SC PK B-1.5.3.3.Parking structures should be compatible with adjacent and nearby uses. Use the urban architectural guidelines to design parking structure façades to appear as building façades.Urban SC PK This relates to B-2.3.2.1.3. I think this is a better link and the other is duplicative given requirements listed FOR building facades. ~~***Does UDC speak to parking structures as something that requires DR?***~~ Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)3 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref B-1.5.3.3.1.Coordinate the location and design of vehicular ingress/egress to maintain safe visibility for adjacent pedestrian and roadway circulation. Urban SC PK Parking structures should probably require DR B-1.5.3.3.2.Locate parking level ramps internally away from roadways to avoid the structural expression of diagonal elements on exterior façades.Urban SC PK Parking structures should probably require DR B-1.5.3.3.3. Use solid panels or other architectural elements to screen vehicles and parking levels from public view. Vehicles parked along the perimeter of parking levels should use pedestrian lines of sight from the farthest edge of the adjoining right-of-way to determine the height and effectiveness of screening. Urban SC PK Parking structures should probably require DR B-1.5.3.4.Design and arrange on-street parking to produce a traffic calming effect adjacent to pedestrian environments and streetscapes.Urban SC PK What sort of onstreet parking doesn't do this inherently (for good or bad)? B-1.5.3.4.1.Coordinate the location, orientation, and design of on-street parking with traffic patterns, cycling lanes, transit facilities, streetscapes, pedestrian environments, and public spaces.Urban SC PK Like ACHD would allow them to conflict with traffic patterns? B-1.5.3.4.2.Integrate traffic calming strategies and techniques, such as landscape islands, bulb-outs, and detailed crosswalks, to increase safety and enhance the urban character along roadways. Urban SC PK In urban, this seems like its design manual not UDC C-1.4.3.3.3. B-1.6 Public and Open Space Urban SC PO Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-1.6.2.1.To provide a variety of attractive, usable, and integrated public spaces that encourage pedestrian activity and enhance the character of urban environments.Urban SC PO Doesn't really say anything. Sub items all merged into other sections B-1.6.3.1.Design public urban spaces as destinations within urban environments that provide places for recreation, social gathering, and other pedestrian activities. Urban SC PO TOD / Downtown? Need better drive from Comp Plan C-1.5.3.1 B-1.6.3.1.1.Provide public urban spaces of appropriate types and sizes that are proportional to the use and intensity of proposed developments.Urban SC PO B-1.6.3.1.2. Public and open spaces are not required to be located at ground level, but developments that incorporate open space above ground level that is not accessible to the public should contribute to or establish public or open space elsewhere on-site or nearby. Urban SC PO I can't see when this would possibly come into play in Meridian? Revised to maybe be a little more useful. Might just be a delete B-1.6.3.1.3. Clearly delineate the edges of public urban spaces from other urban elements. Use building façades, materials, architectural features, landscaping, or other appropriate means to define the edges of the space. Urban SC PO Examples are overly broad. Any façade or landscaping is a "material"D-1.5.3.1.3 B-1.6.3.1.4. Where possible, place public and open spaces adjacent or in close proximity to transit facilities, building entries, roadways, pedestrian walkways, and other public spaces to establish an interconnected system of urban spaces. Urban SC PO C-1.5.3.1.3. B-1.6.3.1.5.Where appropriate, use public and open spaces as transitions between land uses to promote community connectivity and compatibility among land uses.Urban SC PO Similar in B, C, and D C-1.5.3.1.3. B-1.6.3.2. Incorporate pedestrian-oriented amenities that promote various active and passive uses within public and open spaces. Pedestrian amenities include, but not are not limited to, furnishings, hardscapes, landscaping, artwork, lighting, water features, and decorative details. Urban SC PO B, C, D, and E all similar. Doesn't seem like a UDC thing, but if this stays in the "site" category of things, we lose the ability to require for downtown? B-1.6.3.2.1.Use decorative pavers or other materials suitable for hardscapes that endure well and add texture, color, pattern, and decoration to public spaces. Urban SC PO B, C, and D. Doesn't seem like a UDC thing, but if this stays in the "site" category of things, we lose the ability to require for downtown?C-1.5.3.2.1. B-1.6.3.2.2.Incorporate plantings, trees, and other plant materials to add vertical texture and variety to public spaces; coordinate streetscapes to maintain a consistent look along roadways.Urban SC PO Similar in all categories (B, C, D, and E). Some differences. Do we have downtown appropriate landscape guidelines, or is it all City Core Streetscape/Alternative Compliance? B-1.6.3.2.3. Provide adequate seating that reflects the nature of the intended activities. Use fixed seating, such as benches, low walls, steps, and planter or fountain edges, and/or movable seating, like tables and chairs. Urban SC PO Similar in all categories (B, C, D, and E). Merge C-1.5.3.2.3. B-1.6.3.2.4.Introduce public art as an integral part of the public realm. As appropriate, incorporate artwork as an integrated component of the building design or as a feature or element of the public space.Urban SC PO B and C, D and E are very similar. Merge D-1.5.3.2.4. B-1.6.3.2.5.Include decorative details and elements, such as banners, flags, signs, and planters, which visually enhance the attractiveness and character of the space with additional layers of color and texture.Urban SC PO B, C, D, and E all identical. Merge C-1.5.3.2.5. B-1.6.3.2.6.Where appropriate, provide adequate lighting with integrated pedestrian-scaled fixtures to support the intended activities within public and open spaces. Urban SC PO "Adequate" would encompass and imply appropriate C-1.5.3.2.6. B-1.6.3.3.11-3A-16 Public and open spaces should maintain pedestrian and user safety and provide secure environments that avoid dead areas, hidden corners, dark areas, and unusable space.Urban SC PO Safety should not be optional? Kind of a given anyways. B, C, and D. UDC is limited D-1.5.3.3 B-1.7 Streetscape Urban SC SS Just a heading that will exist where appropriate. Specific to Urban B-1.7.2.1.To promote an attractive urban street character that accomodates various pedestrian activities and establishes a general level of consistency among urban roadways and urban environments.Urban SC SS Need a note that excludes residential from these? Otherwise they're applicable for all. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)4 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref B-1.7.3.1. Integrate streetscape profiles along roadways and blocks to maintain the continuity of the urban environment. Use streetscape profiles consisting of the following three zones: the landscape and furnishing zone, the pedestrian mobility zone, and the frontage zone. Urban SC SS Not consistent with title 8 language (intent is downtown). Revised to be generic and point elsewhere. Need to reference DMSP (cleanup from old standards ). B-1.7.3.1.1. The landscape or furnishing zone is located along the curb and includes, but is not limited to, street trees, seating, street and pedestrian lighting, kiosks, wayfinding signs, bicycle racks, trash receptacles, transit shelters, and planters. This zone, along with on-street parking or cycling lanes, where available, provides a buffer for pedestrians. Urban SC SS For downtown, but UDC, guidelines and street plan address B-1.7.3.1.2. The pedestrian mobility zone is adjacent to the landscape zone. This zone provides unobstructed passage for pedestrians. Encroachments that inhibit pedestrian movement, such as portable business signs, product displays, and newspaper stands, are prohibited in this zone. Urban SC SS For downtown, but UDC, guidelines and street plan address B-1.7.3.1.3. The frontage or commerce zone provides a buffer between the pedestrian mobility zone and adjacent building façades. The intent of this zone is to provide flexibility to accommodate various ground-floor uses and business activity fronting the roadway, such as seating, tables and chairs, product displays, and advertisements. Urban SC SS For downtown, but UDC, guidelines and street plan address B-1.7.3.2.Depending on adjacent land uses and roadway typologies, the dimensions of streetscape profiles and individual zones may vary to accommodate anticipated pedestrian activity.Urban SC SS For downtown, but UDC, guidelines and street plan address B-1.7.3.2.1.A typical width for streetscapes is 20 feet (8-foot landscape zone, 8- to 10-foot pedestrian zone, and a 2- to 4-foot frontage zone), unless otherwise specified for an urban area.Urban SC SS Not consistent with title 8 language (intent is downtown). Delete as ideas are merged in 1.7.3.1. B-1.7.3.2.2. The minimum width for streetscape profiles should not be less than 15 feet. Reduced widths for individual zones require approval from appropriate City staff and should be based on severely constrained conditions. Urban SC SS Not consistent with title 8 language (intent is downtown). Delete as ideas are merged in 1.7.3.1 B-1.7.3.2.3. Additional widths are optional and encouraged to accommodate higher pedestrian activity levels, enhanced landscaping or additional trees, and larger commerce areas in front of retail and commercial uses. Coordinate additional widths to achieve a balance among the three zones. Urban SC SS For downtown, but guidelines and street plan address. Not current terminology. B-1.7.3.3. Integrate landscaping and streetscapes as appropriate to create an aesthetic urban character and enhance pedestrian environments and public spaces. Use an organizational strategy for landscape plantings to promote aesthetic compositions that enhance development character. Urban SC SS I have no idea what the intent of this is. Second half is identical to B and C. Should separate?C-1.6.2.1. B-1.7.3.3.1.Use formal planting arrangements, such as regular and linear intervals and geometric patterns, for streetscapes, public spaces, parks, plazas and squares. Urban SC SS B, C, and D virtually identical.C-1.6.2.1.1. B-1.7.3.3.2.Use informal planting arrangements, such as irregular intervals, random patterns and groupings, to create additional interest and focal elements or provide a natural setting within public spaces. Urban SC SS Merged intent of B,C, and D. Should this exempt E? Doesn't seem like it should - residential require landscape buffers still?C-1.6.2.1.2. B-1.7.3.3.3. Use appropriate classes of trees for urban environments and streetscapes. Consider height and canopy diameter at mature growth for spacing and aesthetics as well as watering requirements, maintenance, and soil conditions before selecting species. Urban SC SS There's no reason this needs to be specific to urban. Merge. UDC trees need to be modified - City should not preclude Class III trees in urban areas (ACHD can do that).C-1.6.2.2.1. B-1.7.3.3.4.Provide clear branch heights of at least 8 feet above sidewalks and designated walkways and 14 feet above roadways to promote pedestrian safety and avoid conflicts with vehicles.Urban SC SS This is important…but it’s a maintenance thing not design, for the most part. Don’t start with trees big enough to do this day one, usually. B-1.7.3.3.5.Use planting arrangements that feature seasonal plants, flowers, and ornamental trees to provide accents and focal points.Urban SC SS This makes a huge impact, but it kind of seems like something we should not require. Especially with streetscape standards set by Parks. B-2.1 Cohesive Design Urban AC CD Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-2.1.2.1.To promote vertically integrated building designs that incorporate enduring architectural characteristics to create and visually enhance an appropriate and timeless urban environment.Urban AC CD B-2.1.3.3.2.Where appropriate, incorporate human and pedestrian scale as integral components of the building design.Urban AC CD B, C, and D. E similar. Merge B-2.1.3.4.Design vertically integrated structures that generally locate active uses at or near ground level adjacent to roadways, pedestrian environments, and public spaces.Urban AC CD Kind of a given…? Not going to put stuff people want to walk to, on the 3rd floor. B-2.1.3.5.Use building design and architecture to promote mixed-use and denser developments as aesthetically pleasing elements of urban environments.Urban AC CD I don't know what this is saying, or that its anything that can be pointed to, to say do B-2.2 Building Scale Urban AC BS Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-2.2.2.1.Proposed developments should provide appropriately scaled buildings compatible in height, mass, and form with the anticipated character of the urban environment. Urban AC BS Objective shouldn’t try to provide details or examples that actions address C-2.2.2.1 B-2.2.2.1.1.Coordinate the placement, orientation, and design of buildings to mitigate and avoid the visual appearance of buildings that present an overwhelming form, mass, and scale.Urban AC BS Revise to cover others C-2.2.2.1.1. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)5 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref B-2.2.2.1.3. Use variation in building form, including, but not limited to, step-backs, similar roof forms, and building height, to ensure adjacent building elements are compatible and/or transition to adjacent uses. Urban AC BS Similar in B, C, D, and E. Merged C-2.2.2.2. B-2.2.2.3.2.Human scale is required at the ground or pedestrian level at building entries, along roadways, and adjacent to public spaces. Urban AC BS Similar in B, C, and D. Terminology floats (human vs ped). Merged B-2.3 Building Form Urban AC BF Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-2.3.2.1.1. Building façades that face roadways, public spaces, and pedestrian environments should incorporate façade modulations, including, but not limited to, appropriately proportioned projections, recesses, and step-backs that articulate wall planes and break up building masses. Urban AC BF B, C, D, and E are similar. Merged C-2.3.2.1.1. B-2.3.2.1.3. Parking structures should incorporate modulations, architectural elements, details, materials, and finishes that unify the structure with a coherent building design and character on all appropriate façades. Urban AC BF If we're saying design parking structures like adjacent buildings, and that adjacent buildings have to do this, is this then unnecessary? See B-1.5.2.3. Otherwise make DR mandatory as a "building" B-2.3.2.2.Incorporate visual and physical distinctions in the building design between lower and upper stories that enhance urban building forms, articulate façades, and integrate pedestrian and human scale.Urban AC BF Similar to C and D, but no upper/lower floor distinction. Separating stories here, and preserving other considerations in subsequent guidelines as Core guideline C-2.3.2.2. B-2.3.2.2.3. Design upper stories to complement the lower stories and create a cohesive building design. Use divisions, fenestration, architectural elements, details, accent materials, and human scale to relate building façades to surrounding uses and create an appropriate urban form and street wall. Urban AC BF C-2.3.2.2.1. and C-2.3.2.2.2. are better as similar text but broken into two guidelines.C-2.3.2.2.1. B-2.3.2.2.5.Building designs in Old Town and within designated areas of the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan are encouraged to use the “base,” “body,” “top” concept to integrate horizontal and vertical divisions.Urban AC BF This is weird. The last few guidelines described this, but never named it (base, body, top).C-2.3.2.2.6. B-2.3.2.4. Design façades to accommodate ground-level floor-to-floor heights that are proportionally taller than upper stories. Ground- or street-level uses adjacent to public spaces and along roadways should establish exterior transom or bulkhead heights of 12 to 18 feet. Urban AC BF Functionally same as one in C-2.3.2.4.. KEEP THIS ONE FOR MIXED USE, and the one in D for VANILLA COMMERCIAL D-2.3.2.4. B-2.4 Architectural Elements Urban AC AE Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-2.4.2.3.4. Use screening techniques, architectural elements, and materials that are consistent with the building design and do not detract from the aesthetic appearance of the building and adequately conceal equipment. Urban AC AE Combined with B-2.4.2.3.1 B-2.5 Materials Urban AC MA Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-2.6 Signs and Lighting Urban AC SL Just a heading that will exist where appropriate B-2.6.3.2.2.Use signs that incorporate business and civic logos that identify developments, businesses, and places.Urban AC SL Merged with Similar in C C-2.6.3.2.2. B-2.6.3.2.5.Orient signs toward pedestrians as well as vehicles along roadways and walkways, with the size, shape, materials, details, and illumination related to a human scale.Urban AC SL Signs stay or go to UDC? Some of these are much more specific than UDC. Not much in Comp Plan. B-2.6.3.2.6.Decorative flags and banners should promote the identity of place and enhance the character and attractiveness of buildings and public spaces rather than advertise.Urban AC SL Exists in all categories but residential. Is there anything in UDC on this? This is something that seems ignored in everything else, but useful downtown.C-2.6.3.2.5. C-1.1 Coherent Plan Urb/Sub SC CP Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-1.1.2.1.To encourage integrated, functional, and attractive transitional developments that strengthen identity within the City and support urban and mixed-use areas.Urb/Sub SC CP Goal is weird, and we don't really have suburban/urban areas. Very stark transitions C-1.1.3.1. Developments should establish an appropriate and compatible transitional development pattern that reflects planned and anticipated land uses, development character, and mixed-use opportunities. Urb/Sub SC CP Seems like a UDC in terms of buffers and such. Don't need in DM C-1.1.3.1.1.Develop a master plan for large-scale, phased, and multiple-site proposals to demonstrate the establishment of an appropriate context and the cohesiveness of individual project components.Urb/Sub SC CP Seems like a UDC in terms of buffers and such. Don't need in DM C-1.1.3.1.2.Where appropriate, coordinate with adjacent uses and residential areas, including single-project phases, to promote a cohesive neighborhood. Urb/Sub SC CP Even reading the goal, I don't know what this is actually requesting. Nothing specific C-1.1.3.1.3.Avoid piecemeal and fragmented development that detracts from the establishment of an aesthetic neighborhood appearance and character. Urb/Sub SC CP Core guideline? C, D, and E. Could just as easily apply to B D-1.1.3.1.3. C-1.1.3.1.4.Reduce and mitigate the impacts from proposed developments on adjacent sites as appropriate and compatible with planned and anticipated land uses and development character.Urb/Sub SC CP C-1.1.3.1.5.Mixed-use, large-scale, and multiple-site developments should integrate public space within a discernible center and/or create interconnected pedestrian-oriented nodes. Urb/Sub SC CP Is this needed? C-1.1.3.2.Anticipate the addition of future transit systems to the transportation network and plan for the integration of appropriate transit facilities and infrastructure.Urb/Sub SC CP Duplicate, but urban one may be moved to mixed use.B-1.1.3.2. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)6 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref C-1.1.3.2.1.Coordinate routes, placement of facilities, and infrastructure improvements with the appropriate transportation authorities and any adopted or accepted long-range plans.Urb/Sub SC CP Not convinced transit for non-urban should be addressed in DM. Unless specific to Urban/Downtown. Duplicate from B B-1.1.3.2.1. C-1.1.3.3.Where possible, incorporate and enhance significant natural features as site amenities and/or design elements. Urb/Sub SC CP Exists in C, D, and E. Marked as Comp Plan, but wish UDC was more…firm with protections. Once its lost, very infrequently are they gotten back.D-1.1.3.3. C-1.1.3.4. Appropriately address the critical issues of site layout that influence development character, including, but not limited to, vehicular access, pedestrian connectivity, building orientations, parking, and public space. Urb/Sub SC CP Similar to urban guidelines, little different though. Not sure this is specifically adding anything though. Sub categories address. All in the same "checklist".B-1.1.3.3. C-1.2 Access and Connectivity Urb/Sub SC AC Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-1.2.2.1.To promote the interconnectivity of the community and reduce the impacts that vehicle access points impose on roadways and the physical and visual character of developments.Urb/Sub SC AC This is similar to an Urban item, but context is very different B-1.3.2.2. C-1.2.3.1.Limit direct vehicular access off major roadways, including highways, principal arterials, and other designated mobility corridors, to mitigate development impacts on the roadway system.Urb/Sub SC AC D-1.2.3.1. C-1.2.3.1.1.Coordinate and combine access points with adjacent sites and uses to reduce or eliminate multiple vehicle access points along roadways.Urb/Sub SC AC D is better D-1.2.3.1.2 C-1.2.3.1.2.Provide site ingress/egress from secondary roadways for sites adjacent to major roadways.Urb/Sub SC AC D-1.2.3.1.1. C-1.2.3.1.3.Where secondary roadways cannot be provided, coordinate and combine access points to limit site entry along major roadways.Urb/Sub SC AC D is better D-1.2.3.1.2 C-1.2.3.1.4.Multiple-site and large-scale developments should limit ingress/egress points and establish an internal circulation pattern. Urb/Sub SC AC C-1.2.3.1.5.Use shared access points, secondary roadways, or internal circulation to access corner sites.Urb/Sub SC AC Not sure if in UDC. Should be, but relating to final constructed improvements of actual building siting and parking, and the variations that happen from concept plans, maybe could use some finesse requirements? Results not always awesome D-1.2.3.1.5. C-1.2.3.2.Provide pedestrian and vehicular connections that link adjacent uses and circulation patterns, including buildings, public spaces, parking areas, roadways, sidewalks, and pathways.Urb/Sub SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. C-1.2.3.2.1.Where possible, coordinate and align ingress/egress points, cross access, and internal circulation patterns to provide vehicular connectivity.Urb/Sub SC AC Restate mix of several others. Delete C-1.2.3.1.2. C-1.2.3.2.2. Unrestricted access points and roadways used for site entry should align across primary roadways to form controlled intersections. Coordinate intersections with the transportation authority as appropriate. Urb/Sub SC AC D is better D-1.2.3.2.4 C-1.2.3.2.3.Multiple pedestrian routes should converge on public and open spaces, such as transit facilities, courtyards, plazas, building entries, and other site amenities.Urb/Sub SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. C-1.2.3.3. Establish internal site circulation as an interconnected network of walkways, pathways, roadways, and enhanced drive aisles that promote pedestrian and vehicular mobility within the development and connections to adjacent uses. Urb/Sub SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. C-1.2.3.4.11-3G-3C4 Plan for access and connectivity to future transit facilities, including, but not limited to, park-and- ride locations, pullouts, stops, and shelters. Urb/Sub SC AC VRT does not comment on applications. We could be preserving for them. Exists in C, D, and E. Similar in E.D-1.2.3.3. C-1.2.3.4.1.Coordinate with the appropriate agencies and organizations to ensure the successful integration of transit facilities and the necessary infrastructure as integrated elements of the development. Urb/Sub SC AC C-1.2.3.4.2.Provide adequate pedestrian connections from public spaces, building entries, and parking areas that allow convenient, direct access to transit facilities.Urb/Sub SC AC Similar in B, C, and D.B-1.3.3.3.2. C-1.3 Orientation and Layout Urb/Sub SC OL Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-1.3.1.1. To ensure that site organization, including, but not limited to, the placement and orientation of buildings, structures, and public spaces, as well as the location and layout of service and parking areas, promotes an integrated built environment that establishes an appropriate development character. Urb/Sub SC OL Similar exists in all. Core?B-1.4.1.1 C-1.3.2.1.Locate buildings to establish an appropriate development character that enhances the compatibility and attractiveness of the site, buildings, and surrounding uses.Urb/Sub SC OL Similar exists in all. Core? Revisions from other section text.B-1.4.2.1. C-1.3.2.1.1.Bring buildings up close to roadways to establish a street presence and orient primary building façades toward roadways and public spaces to accommodate and encourage pedestrian activity. Urb/Sub SC OL Exists in C and D D-1.3.3.2.1. C-1.3.2.1.2. Limit the distance from buildings to roadways and the distance between buildings, including the depth and width of parking areas, to maintain interconnectivity and convenient walking distances for pedestrians. Urb/Sub SC OL Exists in C and D D-1.3.3.2.3. C-1.3.2.1.3. Large-scale and multi-building developments may place buildings away from roadways if a minimum of 40 percent of the buildable frontage is occupied by building façades and/or public space that establish an aesthetically consistent street presence. Urb/Sub SC OL Not sure this is appropriate here. Isn't street frontage required? C, D, and E are similar.D-1.3.3.2.4. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)7 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref C-1.3.2.1.4.Use buildings that incorporate articulated façades and architectural elements to anchor site corners at intersections.Urb/Sub SC OL Functionally same in all sections.B-1.4.2.1.4. C-1.3.2.2.Provide clearly defined building entries and connect them to roadways, pedestrian walkways, public spaces, transit facilities, parking, and adjacent uses. Urb/Sub SC OL D-1.3.3.3. C-1.3.2.2.1.Primary building entries should face roadways, pedestrian environments, or adjacent public space. Secondary and alternative entries may access buildings from parking areas.Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use? C and D only D-1.3.3.3.1. C-1.3.2.2.2.11-3A-19-A3 Large-scale buildings should provide entrances on at least two different building façades with one entrance oriented toward a roadway or accessible public space.Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use? C-1.3.2.3.Strategically locate public spaces and site amenities, such as common open space, transit facilities, plazas, and other appropriate spaces, that encourage and support pedestrian activity.Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use? C & D only D-1.3.3.4. C-1.3.2.3.1.Organize buildings around public space and site amenities to establish destinations that encourage pedestrian activity and mobility within developments.Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use? C & D only D-1.3.3.4.1. C-1.3.2.3.2. Use building façades, enhanced streetscapes, or other appropriate enhancements to frame public spaces and site amenities to create a sense of enclosure and delineate space for the intended activities. Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use? C & D only D-1.3.3.4.2. C-1.3.2.3.3.Orient public spaces and site amenities toward roadways adjacent to building entries, pedestrian environments, and streetscapes or as separations between parking areas.Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use? C & D only D-1.3.3.4.3. C-1.3.2.3.4. Spaces designed for courtyards, outdoor seating, dining areas, or other such spaces should coordinate with building orientations and circulation patterns to maximize adjacency to pedestrian activity. Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use? C & D only. Consider some of these as "amenities" for UDC, for mixed use (bill comment)?D-1.3.3.4.4. C-1.3.2.4.11-3G-3C4 Locate parking toward the interior of the site and integrate parking areas to establish an attractive built environment that provides accessibility to public spaces and buildings. Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use? C & D only D-1.3.3.5. C-1.3.2.4.1.Place parking areas away from site corners, primarily to the rear and/or side of buildings, and where possible, avoid expansive parking areas along roadways.Urb/Sub SC OL C-1.3.2.4.2. Use a parking strategy to minimize the land area devoted to vehicular parking; include, as appropriate, structured parking, on-street parking, smaller, integrated parking areas, and/or shared parking as alternatives to general surface parking. Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use?D-1.3.3.5.2. C-1.3.2.4.3.Distribute parking into smaller areas around, between, and behind structures to shorten the distance to buildings, pedestrian walkways, public spaces, site amenities, and roadways.Urb/Sub SC OL Mixed use? C & D only D-1.3.3.5.3. C-1.3.2.5. Where possible, coordinate the placement of public spaces, site amenities, parking areas, and/or buildings with adjacent properties to encourage integrated developments and support community connectivity. Urb/Sub SC OL B-1.4.2.7. C-1.3.2.6.Locate site services, building utilities, and mechanical equipment to enhance the attractiveness of the built environment and minimize impacts on adjacent uses. Urb/Sub SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, and D. See B B-1.4.2.6. C-1.3.2.6.1.Place and orient service and loading areas, mechanical equipment, and utilities away from residential properties, pedestrian and public spaces, and building entrances.Urb/Sub SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, and D. See B B-1.4.2.6.1. C-1.3.2.6.2.Where possible, place service and loading areas behind buildings and provide access from parking areas, internal circulation, and/or local roadways. Urb/Sub SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, and D. See B B-1.4.2.6.2. C-1.3.2.6.3.Coordinate the placement of freestanding site services and mechanical equipment to eliminate conflicts with vehicle and pedestrian circulation.Urb/Sub SC OL This does not exist in B, but could/should D-1.3.3.7.3. C-1.3.2.6.4.Place utility lines underground and away from planting zones whenever possible.Urb/Sub SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, and D. See B B-1.4.2.6.3. C-1.4 Parking Urb/Sub SC PK Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C1.4.2.1. To incorporate parking as an integrated element of the built environment and address issues that influence the physical and visual characteristics of parking areas, such as the appropriate location of parking, size of parking areas, paving materials, landscaping, and screening. Urb/Sub SC PK Exists in B, C, and D. Merged intent in B B-1.5.2.1. C-1.4.3.1. Parking areas should establish an appropriate circulation pattern for pedestrians and vehicles. Large- scale and multi-building sites are encouraged to organize and design circulation patterns that resemble and function as street networks. Urb/Sub SC PK C and D functionally same. Extra content in C is size dependent. Consolidated here. Commercial?D-1.4.3.1. C-1.4.3.1.1.Coordinate vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns to delineate pedestrian walkways and adjoining public spaces. Urb/Sub SC PK Similar to D D-1.4.3.1.2 C-1.4.3.1.2.Provide pedestrian connections from internal circulation to public spaces and adjacent roadways.Urb/Sub SC PK Needs to be better defined. More important than access to arterials for example, are the local and collectors. D-1.4.3.1.3. C-1.4.3.2. Design surface parking as an integrated and attractive element of the built environment that promotes pedestrian comfort and safety and adds to the aesthetic character of developments, in addition to accommodating vehicular uses. Urb/Sub SC PK Needs to be better defined. C and D D-1.4.3.2. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)8 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref C-1.4.3.2.1. Break up parking areas into smaller, separated modules and arrange parking to minimize large impervious paving areas. Use pedestrian circulation, landscaping, and/or public space to separate parking areas. Urb/Sub SC PK B, C, and D all functionally the same. Merged B-1.5.3.1.1. C-1.4.3.2.2.Reduce the depth of parking areas and limit parking between building façades and roadways to 50 percent or less of the total required parking for the site to encourage compact developments. Urb/Sub SC PK Similar in C and D. Seems pointless with current interpretation of small "satellite" buildings along roadway, and has zero functional value to the intent (compact developments)D-1.4.3.2.3. C-1.4.3.2.3.The design and layout of internal site parking should avoid long, unbroken parking bays. Divide parking bay lengths with crossing travel lanes at approximately 300-foot intervals. Urb/Sub SC PK Similar elsewhere with different bay lengths. Think it should just be UDC. Shouldn't matter where you are except maybe, maybe urban. Wording is terrible. Revision not much better…D-1.4.3.2.2. C-1.4.3.2.4.Use trees, landscaping, hardscapes, and architectural elements to provide shade, create interest and human scale for pedestrians, and add aesthetic qualities to parking areas.Urb/Sub SC PK Mixed use / Downtown only?B-1.5.3.1.3. C-1.4.3.2.5. Shade pedestrian walkways and parking, including stalls and drive aisles, with the appropriate type and class of trees and arrange tree plantings in configurations that will provide shade for at least 50 percent of parking surfaces at mature growth. Urb/Sub SC PK This is merged with more generic version for all categories B-1.5.3.1.4. C-1.4.3.2.6.Screen parking with berms, landscaping, walls, architectural elements, or a combination to produce an appropriate buffer adjacent to public spaces, or along roadways and pedestrian walkways. Urb/Sub SC PK More intense than UDC. Exists in B, C, and D to varying degrees.B-1.5.3.1.6. C-1.4.3.2.7.Distribute and integrate appropriately scaled lighting to provide safe and adequately illuminated environments for vehicular and pedestrian use. Urb/Sub SC PK C and D. Seems like should be required or left alone. Under the impression that UDC does not require lighting, only if you decide to provide. Need to decide if we want to require, or not.D-1.4.3.2.8. C-1.4.3.3.Where appropriate, incorporate and arrange on-street parking to produce traffic calming effects for adjacent pedestrian environments and roadways. Urb/Sub SC PK Considered with parking alternatives in downtown. C and D D-1.4.3.3. C-1.4.3.3.1.Coordinate the use of on-street parking, including the design and location, with the transportation authority. Urb/Sub SC PK Similar but less detailed than D. D combines this and C-1.4.2.3.2, which seems to make some sense. Prefer that.D-1.4.3.3.1. C-1.4.3.3.2.Internal roadways are encouraged to use on-street parking that is integrated with streetscapes, parkways, and pedestrian walkways.Urb/Sub SC PK D combines this with C-1.4.2.3.1. Prefer that. C-1.4.3.3.3. Where on-street parking is provided or where vehicles are circulation is directed in front of building entries, integrate traffic calming strategies and techniques, such as landscape islands, bulb-outs, and detailed crosswalks, to increase safety and enhance the development character. Urb/Sub SC PK B-1.5.3.4.2 C-1.4.3.4. Structured parking facilities are encouraged and should be designed to coordinate vehicular ingress/egress and screen parking levels adjacent to roadways and public spaces. Use the appropriate architectural guidelines in the Design Manual under sections B and C, as appropriate, to design parking structure façades. Urb/Sub SC PK This is handled elsewhere. C-1.5 Public and Open Space Urb/Sub SC PO Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-1.5.2.1. To provide a variety of attractive, usable, and integrated public spaces and open spaces that enhance development character, encourage pedestrian use and contribute to community life and the positive experience of daily activities. Urb/Sub SC PO Just a goal…probably similar to others. Combine later if appropriate D-1.5.2.1 C-1.5.3.1.Design public and open spaces as destinations within individual developments and mixed-use areas that provide places for recreation, social gathering, and other pedestrian activities. Urb/Sub SC PO Seems like this is said in a lot of different ways. Merged D-1.5.3.1. C-1.5.3.1.1.Provide appropriate types and sizes of public and open spaces, including development amenities, that are proportional to the proposed use and intensity of development.Urb/Sub SC PO There is no scaled value for consolidated open space (more people = more area). Also, this is not talking about landscape buffers or parkways, which count in part for the UDC (see parent objective C- 1.5.3.1). UDC Workgroup brought this up. D-1.5.3.1.1. C-1.5.3.1.2.Clearly delineate the edges of public spaces. Use building façades, materials, architectural features, landscaping, or other appropriate means to define the edges of the space.Urb/Sub SC PO D-1.5.3.1.3 C-1.5.3.1.3. Where appropriate, place public and open spaces adjacent or in close proximity to transit facilities, building entries, roadways, pedestrian walkways, and other public spaces, and provide pedestrian connections. Urb/Sub SC PO Some of these throughout in different forms. Consolidate. Near identical in D, and similar in A/B D-1.5.3.1.4. C-1.5.3.1.4.Design public spaces to provide visual interest that enhances development character and complements adjacent building designs.Urb/Sub SC PO D is better D-1.5.3.1.6 C-1.5.3.1.5.Where appropriate, use public and open spaces as transitions between land uses to promote community connectivity and compatibility among land uses.Urb/Sub SC PO B, C, D, and similar in E B-1.6.3.1.5. C-1.5.3.2. Incorporate pedestrian-oriented amenities that promote various active and passive uses within public and open spaces. Pedestrian amenities include, but not are not limited to, furnishings, hardscapes, landscaping, artwork, lighting, water features, and decorative details. Urb/Sub SC PO B, C, and D similar. Merged B-1.6.3.2. C-1.5.3.2.1.Use decorative pavers or other materials suitable for hardscapes that endure well and add texture, color, pattern, and decoration to public spaces. Urb/Sub SC PO B, C, and D B-1.6.3.2.1. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)9 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref C-1.5.3.2.2. Incorporate plantings, trees, and other plant materials to add vertical texture and variety to public spaces. Where appropriate, coordinate streetscapes and/or landscaping to maintain a consistent look along roadways. Urb/Sub SC PO Exists in B, C, D, and E. Use B wording B-1.6.3.2.2. C-1.5.3.2.3. Provide adequate seating that reflects the nature of the intended activities. Use fixed seating, such as benches, low walls, steps, and planter or fountain edges, and/or movable seating like tables and chairs. Urb/Sub SC PO B-1.6.3.2.3. C-1.5.3.2.4.Introduce public art as an integral part of the public realm. As appropriate, incorporate artwork as an integrated component of the building design or as a feature or element of the public space.Urb/Sub SC PO B and C duplicate - D and E similar. Merge B-1.6.3.2.4. C-1.5.3.2.5.Include decorative details and elements, such as banners, flags, signs, and planters, which visually enhance the attractiveness and character of the space with additional layers of color and texture.Urb/Sub SC PO B, C, D, and E all identical.B-1.6.3.2.5. C-1.5.3.2.6.Where appropriate, provide pedestrian-scaled light fixtures that provide adequate lighting levels to support the intended activities within public and open spaces. Urb/Sub SC PO C, D, and E all functionally same. B similar. Merged B-1.6.3.2.6. C-1.5.3.3.Public and open spaces should maintain pedestrian and user safety and provide secure environments that avoid dead areas, hidden corners, dark areas, and unusable space.Urb/Sub SC PO Safety should not be optional? Kind of a given anyways. B, C, and D. Should be everywhere B-1.6.3.3 C-1.6 Landscaping Urb/Sub SC LS Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-1.6.1.1 To encourage the attractive and purposeful use of plants and other landscape materials that enhance development character, including public and open space, parking, required buffers, and pedestrian environments. Urb/Sub SC LS Same in C and D. Not sure where to put D-1.6.1.1. C-1.6.2.1. Use an organizational strategy for landscape plantings to promote aesthetic compositions that enhance development character. Avoid indifferent and unsubstantial plantings, particularly along narrow buffers and setbacks. Urb/Sub SC LS This does not say much of anything… C-1.6.2.1.1.Use formal planting arrangements, such as regular and linear intervals and geometric patterns, for streetscapes, parkways, public spaces, parks, plazas, and squares.Urb/Sub SC LS B, C, and D virtually identical B-1.7.3.3.1. C-1.6.2.1.2. Use informal planting arrangements, such as irregular intervals, random patterns, and groupings, to create additional interest and focal elements or to produce a natural setting along roadways, pathways, and within public spaces. Urb/Sub SC LS Merged intent with B B-1.7.3.3.2. C-1.6.2.2.Integrate landscaping as appropriate to establish a consistent appearance and aesthetic character for transitional developments.Urb/Sub SC LS Fluff. Similar to D. Revised to be more "goal" or objective.D-1.6.2.2. C-1.6.2.2.1. Use appropriate classes of trees for urban environments and streetscapes. Consider height and canopy diameter at mature growth for spacing and aesthetics as well as watering requirements, maintenance, and soil conditions before selecting species. Urb/Sub SC LS B, C, and D. Merge if not UDC B-1.7.3.3.3. C-1.6.2.2.2.Landscaping should encourage the appropriate and attractive use of xeric, drought-tolerant plant species and non-plant materials to reduce maintenance and water consumption. Urb/Sub SC LS Allowed under UDC 11-3B-5N+O. Maybe look at water conserving design standards. C and D only.D-1.6.2.2.3. C-1.6.2.2.3.Incorporate various plants and non-vegetative materials that provide groundcover and add interest and texture to landscaping compositions. Avoid the extensive use of turf and lawn as groundcover.Urb/Sub SC LS C and D only.D-1.6.2.2.4. C-1.6.2.2.4.Use planters and planting arrangements that feature seasonal plants, flowers, and ornamental trees to provide accents and focal points.Urb/Sub SC LS C and D only.D-1.6.2.2.5. C-1.6.2.3. Where appropriate or advantageous to promote pedestrian activity, integrate streetscape profiles along roadways, primary drive aisles, building façades, and public spaces. Use the guidelines for streetscapes from Section B of the Design Manual. Urb/Sub SC LS C and D only. Mixed use? Need to revise to reflect section names. Reference livable streets manual maybe?D-1.6.2.3. C-1.6.2.4. Where possible, development should coordinate landscaping with adjacent properties to establish the use of similar elements that produce a complementary character along roadways, buffers, and public space. Urb/Sub SC LS C and D D-1.6.2.4. C-2.1 Cohesive Design Urb/Sub AC CD Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-2.1.3.1. Building designs should appropriately address building scale, mass, and form, and the use of materials, architectural elements, and details to ensure a compatible and aesthetic contribution to the built environment. Urb/Sub AC CD B, C, D, and E all share similarities. Merge B-2.1.3.1. C-2.1.3.2.Use fundamental design principles, including, but not limited to, composition, order, balance, rhythm, repetition, proportion, and scale, to create a unified building design.Urb/Sub AC CD B, C, and D all similar. Merge B-2.1.3.2. C-2.1.3.4.Building design should enhance public and opens spaces, articulate aesthetic character, and provide human and pedestrian scale.Urb/Sub AC CD Similar in B, C, D, and E. Merge all B-2.1.3.3. C-2.1.3.4.2.Where appropriate, incorporate human and pedestrian scale as integral components of the building design.Urb/Sub AC CD Identical in B, C, and D. Similar in E. Merge B-2.1.3.3.2. C-2.1.3.5.Use building design and architecture to promote mixed-use and denser developments as aesthetically pleasing developments throughout the community.Urb/Sub AC CD Same in C and D D-2.1.3.5. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)10 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref C-2.1.3.5.1.Building designs are encouraged to use vertically integrated structures and/or horizontal mixed-use forms to create compact developments.Urb/Sub AC CD Merged with E and D C-2.2 Building Scale Urb/Sub AC BS Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-2.2.1.1. To encourage building designs that appropriately use architectural and human scale to establish compatible physical and visual relationships with adjacent and surrounding developments and reinforce a cohesive architectural character. Urb/Sub AC BS Similar to B, C, D, and E. B revised to cover all B-2.2.1.1 C-2.2.2.1.Proposed developments should use proportion and scale to design buildings compatible in height, mass, and form with an appropriate transitional built environment. Urb/Sub AC BS Similar in all. Merged in B B-2.2.2.1 C-2.2.2.1.1. Infill, greenfield, and redevelopment proposals should coordinate the placement, orientation, and design of buildings to mitigate and avoid the visual appearance of buildings that present an overwhelming form, mass, and scale. Urb/Sub AC BS What is there besides infill and greenfield??? Similar in others, delete B-2.2.2.1.1. C-2.2.2.2.Design and configure buildings to reduce overwhelming and disproportioned architectural scale to establish appropriate relationships to adjacent roadways and uses.Urb/Sub AC BS Similar to others, including D-2.2.2.2 B-2.2.2.1.2. C-2.2.2.2.2. Use variation in building form and proximity to other buildings, including, but not limited to, step- backs, similar roof forms, and building height, to ensure building elements are compatible and/or transition to adjacent uses. Urb/Sub AC BS Similar in B, C, D, and E. Merged B-2.2.2.1.3. C-2.2.2.2.3. Where appropriate, establish a hierarchy of building scales that transition from intense to less intense uses, maintain relationships between stages, and provide opportunities to create distinctive areas and “districts.” Urb/Sub AC BS C, D, and E similar. Really vague - not sure what the intent is. C-2.2.2.3. Incorporate human scale on appropriate building façades to support an aesthetic architectural character that contributes to the quality of the building design, adjacent buildings, and public spaces. Urb/Sub AC BS B, C, and D similar. Merged B-2.2.2.3. C-2.2.2.3.1.Use human scale to emphasize fenestration patterns, architectural elements, proportion, materials, and detailing throughout the façade and building design.Urb/Sub AC BS B, C, D, and E identical B-2.2.2.3.1. C-2.2.2.3.2.Human scale is required at the ground or street level at building entries, along roadways, and adjacent to pedestrian environments and public spaces. Urb/Sub AC BS Similar in B, C, and D. Terminology floats (human vs. ped). Merged B-2.2.2.3.2. C-2.3 Building Form Urb/Sub AC BF Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-2.3.1.1.To enhance the visual interest of building designs and promote quality architectural character.Urb/Sub AC BF B, C and D. Merged with B-2.3.1.1.D-2.3.1.1. C-2.3.2.1.Articulate building forms, including, but not limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of visually aesthetic building designs. Urb/Sub AC BF Need this as a objective to unique goal? B has the same objective but different goal B-2.3.2.1. C-2.3.2.1.1. Building façades that face roadways, public spaces, and pedestrian environments should incorporate façade modulations, including, but not limited to, appropriately proportioned projections, recesses, and step-backs that articulate wall planes and break up building masses. Urb/Sub AC BF B, C, D, and E are similar. Merged B-2.3.2.1.1. C-2.3.2.1.2.Design parking structures as integrated buildings that are compatible with surrounding uses and contribute to the urban form. Urb/Sub AC BF B-2.3.2.1.2. C-2.3.2.1.3. Parking structures should incorporate modulations, architectural elements, details, materials, and finishes that unify the structure with a coherent building design and character on all appropriate façades. Urb/Sub AC BF If we're saying design parking structures like adjacent buildings, and that adjacent buildings have to do this, is this then unnecessary? See B-1.5.2.3.B-2.3.2.1.3. C-2.3.2.2.1.Use divisions, fenestration, architectural elements, details, accent materials, and human scale to articulate building façades that relate to adjacent roadways and uses.Urb/Sub AC BF This is buried in several other guidelines. B is similar but combined with C-2.3.2.2.2.. This is better. Keep.D-2.3.2.2.1. C-2.3.2.2.3. Use horizontal and vertical divisions in wall planes to organize fenestration as integrated elements of façade compositions, provide visual interest and complexity to the building design, and emphasize the structure or feature architectural elements. Urb/Sub AC BF Functionally the same as B-2.3.2.2.1., and identical to one in D. Should all just be same?B-2.3.2.2.1. C-2.3.2.2.4.Design lower stories to visually anchor buildings to the ground or street and appropriately integrate architectural elements and details that emphasize pedestrian scale.Urb/Sub AC BF Don't understand this. "Base body and top" listed below, and the techniques for better buildings as a whole said elsewhere. C and D. Confusing B-2.3.2.2.2. C-2.3.2.2.5. Design the uppermost story or façade wall planes to complete the building design. Use articulation, architectural elements, materials, and details to emphasize the termination of walls, roof planes, or rooftop elements. Urb/Sub AC BF Better said in B. Also in D-2.3.2.2.5.B-2.3.2.2.4 C-2.3.2.2.6.Building designs within designated areas of the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan are encouraged to use the “base,” “body,” “top” concept to integrate horizontal and vertical divisions.Urb/Sub AC BF Already exists in B.B-2.3.2.2.5 C-2.3.2.3. Building designs should establish visual connections that relate internal spaces at ground- or street- level with adjacent roadways, public spaces, and pedestrian environments. Multistory buildings should provide more transparency at ground- or street-level than upper stories. Urb/Sub AC BF Wordy objective, and seems duplicative with action item B-2.3.2.3. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)11 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref C-2.3.2.3.1. Use architectural elements, such as doors and windows, details, and materials to articulate building façades that face roadways, or are adjacent to public spaces and pedestrian environments to establish a transparent relationship between active indoor and outdoor spaces. Urb/Sub AC BF B-2.3.2.3.1. C-2.3.2.4. Building designs should provide proportionally taller ground-level façades to accommodate various uses adjacent to pedestrian environments, roadways, and public spaces where appropriate along an urban edge or as part of a development transition. Provide floor-to-ceiling heights, or floor-to-floor for multistory buildings, from 12 to 18 feet. Urb/Sub AC BF Functionally the same as one in B. Similar to one in D. Need just once and make specific for each new category type.B-2.3.2.4. C-2.3.2.5. Building roof types, forms, and elements should provide variation and interest to building profiles and contribute to the architectural identity of buildings without imposing overwhelming scale on adjacent uses. Urb/Sub AC BF B, C, and D B-2.3.2.5. C-2.3.2.5.1. Building designs should incorporate appropriate roof forms with primary and secondary roof elements that complement the building form and façade designs and help reduce the appearance of building mass and scale. Urb/Sub AC BF B, C, and D B-2.3.2.5.1. C-2.3.2.5.2. Where appropriate, modulate and/or articulate roof types, both flat and sloped, with roof elements, including, but not limited to, parapets, dormers, overhangs, and eaves, architectural detailing, and cornice work. Urb/Sub AC BF B-2.3.2.5.2. C-2.4 Architectural Elements Urb/Sub AC AE Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-2.4.1.1. To integrate architectural elements and details as components of cohesive building designs that enhance the visual interest of building façades, support activity at and/or near ground level, and provide human and pedestrian scale. Urb/Sub AC AE B, C, and D similar. Merge B-2.4.1.1. C-2.4.2.1. Use architectural elements and detailing, including, but not limited to, fenestration patterns, awnings, canopies, balconies, entries, materials, and decorative or ornamental detailing, to articulate façades and contribute to an aesthetic building character. Urb/Sub AC AE Similar to B, which has a few more examples listed. Can break out later if necessary B-2.4.2.1. C-2.4.2.1.1.Design and articulate architectural elements using proportions, divisions, detailing, materials, textures, and colors that appropriately integrate these elements with the building design.Urb/Sub AC AE Exists in all B, C, D, and E. Just needs to be core guidelines.B-2.4.2.1.1. C-2.4.2.1.2. Provide architectural elements and detailing that emphasize human scale throughout the building design. Human scale that uses a high level of design and detailing is required at ground or street level adjacent to roadways, pedestrian environments, and public spaces. Urb/Sub AC AE Functionally the same as B C-2.4.2.1.2. C-2.4.2.1.3. Where appropriate, provide building overhangs or other similar features, such as canopies and awnings, that offer temporary relief from inclement weather along portions of façades that adjoin pedestrian environments. Urb/Sub AC AE This should be a generic, in all areas (except residential). Revise B if necessary to apply to all. Currently, similar to B and identical to D.B-2.4.2.1.3. C-2.4.2.1.4. Integrate strategically located elements as focal points in building designs. Focal elements should be proportional to the building scale and emphasize building corners, entries, adjacent public spaces, and other such features to establish development or building identity. Urb/Sub AC AE B, C, and D similar. Merge B-2.4.2.1.4. C-2.4.2.2. Building designs should not create blank wall segments along roadways or adjacent to public space. Use architectural elements and detailing in combination with color palettes, textural changes, and material combinations to mitigate the stark appearance of blank walls. Landscaping techniques may also be considered. Urb/Sub AC AE Same functional intent for all except maybe residential B-2.4.2.2. C-2.4.2.3. Organize and locate building service equipment, including, but not limited to, mechanical units, flutes, and vents, away from building entries, roadways, public spaces, and where possible from adjacent buildings. Urb/Sub AC AE Functionally identical to B. Same in all except residential B-2.4.2.3. C-2.4.2.3.1.Use integrated architectural elements to provide adequate screening and appropriately conceal service equipment and areas. Urb/Sub AC AE Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.4.2.3.1. C-2.4.2.3.2.Screen service equipment at ground level from pedestrian and vehicular view to a minimum height of the equipment on all sides and integrate with the building design and site layout.Urb/Sub AC AE Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.4.2.3.2. C-2.4.2.3.3. Screen service and building equipment that is attached or on top of structures from public view. Use pedestrian lines of sight from the farthest edge of the adjoining right-of-way to determine the height and effectiveness of screening. Urb/Sub AC AE Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.4.2.3.3. C-2.4.2.3.4. Use screening techniques, architectural elements, and materials that are consistent with the building design and do not detract from the aesthetic appearance of the building and adequately conceal equipment. Urb/Sub AC AE Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.4.2.3.4. C-2.5 Materials Urb/Sub AC MA Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C-2.5.1.1.To encourage the use of quality materials that promote aesthetic building designs and appropriate contributions to the development of a timeless community character.Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.5.1.1. C-2.5.2.1.Buildings with façades that face multiple roadways and/or public spaces should use consistent material combinations, quality, and detailing to unify the building design. Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.1. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)12 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref C-2.5.2.2.Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design. Use materials from the following basic groups: wood, masonry, concrete, metal, and glazing.Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.2. C-2.5.2.2.1.Select combinations that emphasize a finished composition and enhance human scale for lower stories and pedestrian scale at ground level. Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.5.2.2.1. C-2.5.2.2.2. Concrete masonry that provides texture, interest, and detail may be appropriate for building designs; however, the use of ordinary, smooth face block, unfinished, colored, or painted, is not an acceptable finish material for building façades along roadways, adjacent to public spaces, and residential areas. Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.5.2.2.2. C-2.5.2.2.3. Use well-detailed, proportioned, and durable materials that will weather and age gracefully, adding to the architectural character over time. Avoid non-durable materials that deteriorate quickly and require frequent maintenance or replacement. Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.2.3. C-2.5.2.2.4.Create interest and variety in façade design to establish attractive architectural character and human scale. Urb/Sub AC MA B, C, and D all similar B-2.5.2.2.4. C-2.5.2.2.5.Provide pattern, texture, and detail in the building design and distinguish field materials from accent materials.Urb/Sub AC MA B, C, D, and E similar B-2.5.2.2.5. C-2.5.2.3. Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. (For example, stone or stone-like products should convey the appearance of mass and should not appear as a thin veneer.) Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.3. C-2.5.2.4.Use colors that complement the use of building materials and support innovative and good design practices.Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4. C-2.5.2.4.1. The use of subtle, neutral, and natural tones for field materials should complement accent colors and materials. The use of deep earth tones or saturated colors to distinguish building façades should enhance the building design and be compatible with adjacent structures. Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4.1. C-2.5.2.4.2.The use of intensely bright and fluorescent colors, as well as the widespread use of saturated hues without complementary colors, materials, and accents, is discouraged.Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4.2. C-2.5.2.4.3. Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as metal or reflective glazing, should be reviewed and evaluated with the Planning staff to minimize glare on roadways, public spaces, and adjacent uses and to determine appropriateness. Urb/Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4.3. C-2.6 Signs and Lighting Urb/Sub AC SL Just a heading that will exist where appropriate C2.6.2.1.To encourage the use of signs and architectural lighting as integrated elements of building and site designs that contribute to the atmosphere of quality, aesthetic built environments.Urb/Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.2.1. C-2.6.3.1.Where appropriate, use lighting on building exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environments along roadways, at intersections, and in public spaces.Urb/Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.1. C-2.6.3.1.1.Coordinate lighting fixture spacing and height along streetscapes and roadways to avoid conflicts with tree plantings.Urb/Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.1.1. C-2.6.3.1.2.The use of architectural lighting is encouraged to be energy-efficient and easily maintained, in addition to providing attractive qualities to building character and public spaces.Urb/Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.1.2. C-2.6.3.1.3.Lighting fixtures used on building exteriors should be integrated with building design and coordinate with architectural elements and building entries.Urb/Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.1.3. C-2.6.3.2. Signs should be integrated with architectural elements and complement building designs and materials. Relate the size, shape, materials, details, and illumination to a pedestrian scale as appropriate, in addition to accommodating vehicles. Urb/Sub AC SL Similar to B and C. Merged D-2.6.3.2. C-2.6.3.2.1.Provide signs to identify individual storefronts, buildings, and uses along roadways, pedestrian environments, and within developments. Avoid large, single signs with multiple tenants.Urb/Sub AC SL Similar to B, C, and D. Merged B-2.6.3.2.1. C-2.6.3.2.2.Use corporate and business logos to identify developments and businesses along roadways, pedestrian environments, and adjacent to public spaces .Urb/Sub AC SL Exists in B, C, and D. Merged in B.D-2.6.3.2.2. C-2.6.3.2.3.Use appropriately scaled signs that incorporate logos, minimize or eliminate the use of large amounts of text, and are compatible with the architectural character and design of the building. Urb/Sub AC SL Exists in B, C and D. Previous item mentioned logos - does not need to be said again. Merged in B.D-2.6.3.2.3. C-2.6.3.2.4.Where buildings are brought up close to roadways, pedestrian environments, and public spaces, use appropriate urban sign types that address pedestrian sight lines in addition to vehicular traffic. Urb/Sub AC SL Functionally same in C and D, but D has some extra which may just be fluff. Similar to a B, urban specific.D-2.6.3.2.4. C-2.6.3.2.5.Decorative flags and banners should promote the identity of place and enhance the character and attractiveness of buildings and public spaces rather than advertise.Urb/Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.2.6. C-3.1.2.1. To promote the appropriate use of site layout, separation techniques, and architectural design guidelines to mitigate the adverse impacts that industrial uses impose on adjacent commercial, residential, and other non-industrial uses. Urb/Sub SPC ID Goal. Industrial Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)13 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref C-3.1.3.1. Orient industrial developments, including buildings, structures, and site elements, such as work yards and material storage, to minimize the off-site impacts of noise, glare, smoke, exhaust, dust, vibration, and so forth, and protect adjacent non-industrial uses. Urb/Sub SPC ID Some of this is a restate of goal (protect) C-3.1.3.2. Provide an appropriate architectural design for buildings and structures that are adjacent to a public roadway. Articulate building façades facing the roadway as appropriate with modulation fenestration, material, color and textual changes, roof form and variation, and architectural elements. Urb/Sub SPC ID C-3.1.3.3. Use the placement and orientation of the building or structure to screen industrial activity, including, but not limited to, truck docks, operating equipment, site entries/exits, lights, and mechanical equipment, away from adjacent non-industrial uses. Urb/Sub SPC ID C-3.1.3.4. Maintain the required buffers adjacent to non-residential uses as indicated in the UDC. In addition, apply screening techniques that use landscaping, walls, and architectural elements, or a combination to mitigate the off-site impacts from industrial activities where placement and building orientation alone cannot provide adequate screening. Urb/Sub SPC ID Wordy. Addressed in UDC? C-3.2.2.1.To accommodate the adaptive reuse of the existing residence to a commercial use, while maintaining compatibility with the use(s) on adjoining properties.Urb/Sub SPC RC Goal: Conversions C-3.2.2.2. To ensure that such residential to commercial conversions are compatible with the existing character of the original residential use, while recognizing the need to modify the structure to meet commercial building code requirements. Urb/Sub SPC RC Goal: Conversions C-3.2.3.1. Developments that propose the conversion of residential to commercial within Old Town should comply with the guidelines for site and architectural character as applicable to maintain the original residential character. Urb/Sub SPC RC Text may need to change to reflect new categories and structure with reformat. C-3.2.3.2. Residential to commercial conversions should use the guidelines from Section C. Design Guidelines for Urban/Suburban Developments as well as Section E. Design Guidelines for Residential Developments. Urb/Sub SPC RC Text may need to change to reflect new categories and structure with reformat. C-3.2.3.3. Additions, restorations, and repairs should use similar building forms, materials, and details consistent with the architectural character, style, or period of the original residence.Urb/Sub SPC RC C-3.2.3.4.Where there are site constraints that prevent a conversion from complying with the site character guidelines, the applicant should propose an alternative and meet with the Planning staff for review.Urb/Sub SPC RC D-1.1 Coherent Plan Sub SC CP Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-1.1.2.1.To encourage attractive and functional neighborhood-oriented developments that are compatible and integrated with adjacent uses, including existing and planned residential areas. Sub SC CP Good goal for joined C, D, and E (non multi) D-1.1.3.1. Proposed developments should establish appropriate orientations to surrounding uses and residential neighborhoods that encourage compatible development patterns and support a unified appearance and character. Sub SC CP Fluff - goal and actions say the same D-1.1.3.1.1.Develop a concept plan to demonstrate compatibility with adjacent uses and the cohesiveness of individual project components. Use master plans for phased and multiple-site developments.Sub SC CP This really seems like something that applies to all? This really isn't done very well currently, beyond cursory nod. Especially for well designed ped. Mostly a requirement of annexation or RZ, which is a problem when you don't know how buildings will work. E-1.1.3.1.1. D-1.1.3.1.2.Where appropriate, coordinate with adjacent uses and residential areas, including single project phases, to promote a cohesive neighborhood. Sub SC CP D-1.1.3.1.3.Avoid piecemeal and fragmented development that detracts from the establishment of an aesthetic neighborhood appearance and character. Sub SC CP Core guideline? C, D, and E C-1.1.3.1.3. D-1.1.3.1.4.Use appropriate methods to reduce and mitigate development impacts on adjacent uses that support compatibility and integration with the neighborhood.Sub SC CP This does not say anything…? Bill indicates this is a landscape buffer thing. Revise to speak to that. D-1.1.3.2.Anticipate the addition of future transit systems to the transportation network and plan for the integration of appropriate facilities and infrastructure. Sub SC CP Identical in D and E, similar in others. Core?E-1.1.3.3. D-1.1.3.2.1. Coordinate routes, placement of facilities, and infrastructure improvements with the appropriate transportation authorities and any adopted or accepted long-range plans.Sub SC CP Similar in all B-1.1.3.2.1. D-1.1.3.3.Where possible, incorporate and enhance significant natural features as site amenities and/or design elements. Sub SC CP Exists in C, D, and E. probably in E though written differently. Core?C-1.1.3.3. D-1.1.3.4. Appropriately address the critical issues of site layout that influence development character, including, but not limited to, vehicular access, pedestrian connectivity, building orientations, parking, and public space. Focus on compatible integration with adjacent uses and neighborhood orientation. Sub SC CP More of a goal…zero specifics here. Variations exist in all sections. "merged" thoughts.B-1.1.3.3. D-1.2 Access and Connectivity Sub SC AC Just a heading that will exist where appropriate Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)14 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref D-1.2.2.1.To promote the interconnectivity of the community and reduce the impacts that vehicle access points impose on roadways and the physical and visual character of developments.Sub SC AC This should stay if any vehicle access actions remain and aren't instead addressed in UDC.C-1.2.2.1. D-1.2.3.1.Limit direct vehicular access off major roadways, including highways, principle arterials, and other designated mobility corridors, to mitigate development impacts on the roadway system.Sub SC AC C-1.2.3.1. D-1.2.3.1.1.Provide vehicular ingress/egress from secondary roadways for sites adjacent to major roadways. Sub SC AC C-1.2.3.1.2. D-1.2.3.1.2.Where secondary roadways cannot be provided, coordinate and combine access points to reduce or eliminate multiple access points along major roadways.Sub SC AC Need a much more concrete way of requiring this. Rarely happens well when required at later date. Results in a lot of unsafe parking aisles and rarely actual (safe) drive aisles... D-1.2.3.1.3.Limit access points on arterial roadways to strategic locations, such as residential and commercial entries, secondary roadways, or primary drive aisles. Sub SC AC D-1.2.3.1.4.Developments should anticipate and coordinate vehicular ingress/egress with adjacent uses and establish internal circulation patterns that minimize access points on roadways.Sub SC AC not sure if in UDC. Should be, but relating to final constructed improvements of actual building siting and parking, and the variations that happen from concept plans, maybe could use some finesse requirements? D-1.2.3.1.5.Use shared access points, secondary roadways, or internal circulation to access corner sites.Sub SC AC C and D C-1.2.3.1.5. D-1.2.3.1.6.Site entryways, primary circulation patterns, and connections to adjacent uses should appear and function like complete streets rather than oriented to accommodate only vehicles.Sub SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. *~This is a large problem with pedestrian connections. They almost always lack ramps or dead end shortly after, seemingly randomly. D-1.2.3.1.7.Provide safe and attractive connections between developments and adjoining uses, including residential areas, which reduce vehicular use, promote walkability, and support access to transit.Sub SC AC D-1.2.3.2 and sub items are more explicit. D-1.2.3.2. Developments should connect with adjacent existing or planned developments and integrate accommodations that provide options to walk, bike, and/or drive without the necessity to use arterial roadways. Sub SC AC D-1.2.3.2.1. Street stub extensions, roadways, and vehicular drive connections to adjacent developments should accommodate pedestrians and incorporate streetscapes or landscaping that create attractive elements between uses. Sub SC AC D-1.2.3.2.2.Connections to residential areas should be designed as attractive entryways to the development and relate to the site layout, including building orientations, public spaces, and parking. Sub SC AC Value in this? Sometimes they connect, but not like what this suggests. Half the time it seems like a road suddenly turned sidewalk when residents (who new it was coming via sign, when they moved in) want their faux cul-de-sac. D-1.2.3.2.3.Where appropriate, coordinate and align ingress/egress points, cross access, and internal circulation patterns to provide vehicular connectivity.Sub SC AC D-1.2.3.2.4.Access points and roadways used for site entry should align across primary roadways to form controlled intersections. Coordinate intersections with the transportation authority as appropriate.Sub SC AC C-1.2.3.2.2. D-1.2.3.2.5. Integrate pedestrian routes with site circulation patterns that converge on building entries, public and open spaces, and transit facilities and provide connections to parking areas, sidewalks, pathways, and roadways. Sub SC AC Common theme (ped connections) D-1.2.3.3.Plan for access and connectivity to future transit facilities, including, but not limited to, park-and- ride locations, pullouts, stops, and shelters. Sub SC AC Exists in C, D, and E. Similar in E.C-1.2.3.4. D-1.2.3.3.1.Coordinate with the appropriate agencies and organizations to ensure successful integration of transit facilities and infrastructure as integrated elements of the development. Sub SC AC I think that C-1.2.3.4. / D-1.2.3.3. implies this. D-1.2.3.3.2.Provide adequate pedestrian connections from adjacent uses, public spaces, building entries, and parking areas that allow convenient, direct access to transit facilities.Sub SC AC Similar in B, C, and D.B-1.3.3.3.2. D-1.3 Orientation and Layout Sub SC OL Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-1.3.2.1. To ensure that site organization, including, but not limited to, the placement and orientation of buildings, structures, and public spaces, as well as the location and layout of service and parking areas, establishes an appropriate neighborhood-oriented development character. Sub SC OL Similar exists in all. Core?B-1.4.1.1 D-1.3.3.1. Developments should establish an organizing framework of roadways, primary drive aisles, and pedestrian walkways that provide an internal circulation network, which promotes vehicular and pedestrian mobility, parallel routes, and connectivity to adjacent uses. Sub SC OL I think some of this is lost with long drawn out and phased projects, especially with big commercial developments. The specific buildings don't "connect" D-1.3.3.2.Locate buildings to establish an appropriate development character that enhances the compatibility and attractiveness of the site, buildings, and surrounding uses. Sub SC OL Similar exists in all. Core? Revisions from other section text.B-1.4.2.1. D-1.3.3.2.1.Bring buildings up close to roadways to establish a street presence and orient primary building façades toward roadways and public spaces to accommodate and encourage pedestrian activity. Sub SC OL C and D. Use for Com/Mixed use? NOT core?C-1.3.2.1.1. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)15 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref D-1.3.3.2.2. In addition to the establishment of a street presence, developments should create appropriate relationships to surrounding uses, including residential areas that integrate a mixture of mitigation and enhancement techniques, but not limited to screening. Sub SC OL Exists in D and E. Not sure of value. Received no comment so deleting.E-1.3.2.2.2. D-1.3.3.2.3. Limit the distance from buildings to roadways and the distance between buildings, including the depth and width of parking areas, to maintain interconnectivity and convenient walking distances for pedestrians. Sub SC OL Exists in C and D C-1.3.2.1.2. D-1.3.3.2.4. Multi-building developments may place buildings away from roadways if a minimum of 40 percent of the buildable frontage is occupied by building façades and/or public space that establish an aesthetically consistent street presence. Sub SC OL C, D, and E C-1.3.2.1.3. D-1.3.3.2.5.Use buildings that incorporate articulated façades and architectural elements to anchor site corners at intersections and where developments are adjacent to residential areas.Sub SC OL Functionally same in all sections.B-1.4.2.1.4. D-1.3.3.3.Provide clearly defined building entries and connect them to roadways, pedestrian walkways, public spaces, transit facilities, parking, and adjacent uses. Sub SC OL C-1.3.2.2. D-1.3.3.3.1.Primary building entries should face roadways, pedestrian environments, or adjacent public space. Secondary and alternative entries may access buildings from parking area.Sub SC OL C and D only.C-1.3.2.2.1. D-1.3.3.3.2. Retail buildings with multiple entries or that occupy a prominent location, such as a block corner or street intersection, are encouraged to provide entrances on at least two different building façades with one entrance oriented toward a roadway or accessible public space. Sub SC OL Developers do not like this. Encourage vs. require. Tenants do make it work when they want the prominent location, though. Putting the other door on major arterial when no one walks there is silly. Makes sense where ped activity is, or will be. If required, only where its appropriate (e.g. - not Eagle Rd or regional mixed use). Regardless, need safer access D-1.3.3.4.Strategically locate public spaces and site amenities, such as common open space, transit facilities, plazas, and other appropriate spaces that encourage and support pedestrian activity. Sub SC OL C and D only.C-1.3.2.3. D-1.3.3.4.1.Organize buildings around public space and site amenities to establish destinations that encourage pedestrian activity and mobility within developments.Sub SC OL C and D only.C-1.3.2.3.1. D-1.3.3.4.2. Use building façades, enhanced streetscapes, or other appropriate enhancements to frame public spaces and site amenities to create a sense of enclosure and delineate space for the intended activities. Sub SC OL C and D only.C-1.3.2.3.2. D-1.3.3.4.3.Orient public spaces and site amenities toward roadways adjacent to building entries, pedestrian environments, and streetscapes or as separations between parking areas. Sub SC OL C and D only.C-1.3.2.3.3. D-1.3.3.4.4. Spaces designed for courtyards, outdoor seating, dining areas, or other such spaces should coordinate with building orientations and circulation patterns to maximize adjacency to pedestrian activity. Sub SC OL C and D only.C-1.3.2.3.4. D-1.3.3.5. Locate parking toward the interior of the site and integrate parking areas to support the establishment of an attractive built environment that provides accessibility to public spaces and buildings. Sub SC OL C and D only.C-1.3.2.4. D-1.3.3.5.1. Parking should not be a dominant feature along roadways. Place parking areas away from site corners primarily to the rear and/or side of buildings, and where possible, avoid expansive parking areas along roadways. Sub SC OL Seems universal, especially with "as appropriate". May be embedded in other previous actions though D-1.3.3.5.2. Use a parking strategy to minimize the land area devoted to vehicular parking; include, as appropriate, structured parking, on-street parking, smaller, integrated parking areas and/or shared parking as alternatives to general surface parking. Sub SC OL Seems universal, especially with "as appropriate". May be embedded in other previous actions though C-1.3.2.4.2. D-1.3.3.5.3.Distribute parking into smaller areas around, between, and behind structures to shorten the distance to buildings, pedestrian walkways, public spaces, site amenities, and roadways.Sub SC OL C and D only.C-1.3.2.4.3. D-1.3.3.6. Where possible, coordinate the placement of public spaces, site amenities, parking areas, and buildings with adjacent properties to encourage integrated developments and support community connectivity. Sub SC OL B, C, and D all similar B-1.4.2.7. D-1.3.3.7.Locate site services, building utilities, and mechanical equipment to enhance the attractiveness of the built environment and minimize impacts on adjacent uses. Sub SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, and D. See B B-1.4.2.6. D-1.3.3.7.1.Place and orient service and loading areas, mechanical equipment, and utilities away from residential properties, pedestrian and public spaces, and building entrances.Sub SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, and D. See B B-1.4.2.6.1. D-1.3.3.7.2.Where possible, place service and loading areas behind buildings and provide access from parking areas, internal circulation, and/or local roadways. Sub SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, and D. See B B-1.4.2.6.2. D-1.3.3.7.3.Coordinate the placement of freestanding site services and mechanical equipment to eliminate conflicts with vehicle and pedestrian circulation.Sub SC OL This does not exist in B, but could/should. Exists in C C-1.3.2.6.3. D-1.3.3.7.4.Place utility lines underground and away from planting zones whenever possible. Sub SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, and D. See B B-1.4.2.6.3. D-1.4 Parking Sub SC PK Just a heading that will exist where appropriate Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)16 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref D-1.4.2.1. To incorporate parking as an attractive, integrated element of development and address issues that influence the physical and visual characteristics of parking areas, such as the appropriate location for parking, size of parking areas, paving materials, landscaping, and screening. Sub SC PK Exists in B, C, and D. Merged intent in B B-1.5.2.1. D-1.4.3.1.Parking should establish appropriate circulation patterns that accommodate and balance pedestrian and vehicular uses. Sub SC PK C and D functionally the same. C has extra text, but listed as optional dependent on size C-1.4.3.1. D-1.4.3.1.1.Neighborhood-oriented developments are encouraged to use parking configurations that contribute to a functional internal circulation network. Sub SC PK Kind of vague. Mostly a goal? D-1.4.3.1.2.Coordinate vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns to delineate travel lanes from pedestrian walkways and adjoining public spaces. Sub SC PK Really seems like a purely safety thing. Pedestrian travel delineation and crossings needs to get a lot better than currently in large non-residential developments C-1.4.3.1.1. D-1.4.3.1.3.Provide pedestrian connections from internal circulation to public spaces and adjacent roadways.Sub SC PK C and D.C-1.4.3.1.2. D-1.4.3.2. Design surface parking as an integrated and attractive element of the built environment that promotes pedestrian comfort and safety and adds to the aesthetic character of developments, in addition to accommodating vehicular uses. Sub SC PK C and D.C-1.4.3.2. D-1.4.3.2.1. Break up parking into smaller separated modules and arrange parking to minimize large impervious paving areas. Use pedestrian circulation, landscaping, public space, internal roadways, and primary drive aisles to separate parking areas. Sub SC PK B, C, and D all functionally the same. Merged B-1.5.3.1.1. D-1.4.3.2.2.11-3A-19 Design and lay out parking to avoid long, unbroken parking bays. Parking bay lengths should not exceed 200 feet. Where appropriate, provide crossing travel lanes that improve circulation.Sub SC PK Similar elsewhere with different bay lengths. Second sentence is similar to separate actions. Measurement in C changed to be same as D (per current planning). Delete this one.C-1.4.3.2.3. D-1.4.3.2.3.11-3A-19 Limit the amount and depth of parking between building façades and roadways to 50 percent or less of the total required parking for the site to encourage compact developments. Sub SC PK Similar in C and D. Seems pointless with satellite buildings, and has zero functional value to the intent (compact developments)C-1.4.3.2.2. D-1.4.3.2.4.Neighborhood-oriented, small-scale anchors oriented along roadways should distribute parking areas on at least two sides of the building.Sub SC PK In UDC already, and not very clear here D-1.4.3.2.5.Use trees, landscaping, hardscapes, and architectural elements to provide shade, create interest, and human scale for pedestrians, and add aesthetic qualities to parking areas.Sub SC PK B-1.5.3.1.3. D-1.4.3.2.6. Shade pedestrian walkways and parking, including stalls and drive aisles, with the appropriate class and use of trees and arrange tree plantings in configurations that will provide shade for at least 50 percent of parking surfaces at mature growth. Sub SC PK Repeated multiple times B-1.5.3.1.4. D-1.4.3.2.7. Enhance the attractiveness of parking with berms, landscaping, walls, architectural elements, or a combination to produce an appropriate buffer and/or screen adjacent to residential areas, public spaces, or along roadways and pedestrian walkways. Sub SC PK More intense than UDC. Exists in all B, C, and D to varying degrees.B-1.5.3.1.6. D-1.4.3.2.8.Distribute and integrate appropriately scaled lighting to provide safe and adequately illuminated environments for vehicular and pedestrian use. Sub SC PK C and D C-1.4.3.2.7. D-1.4.3.3.Where appropriate, incorporate and arrange on-street parking to produce traffic calming effects for adjacent pedestrian environments and roadways. Sub SC PK C and D C-1.4.3.3. D-1.4.3.3.1. Coordinate the use of on-street parking, including the design and location, with the transportation authority. Internal roadways are encouraged to use on-street parking that is integrated with streetscapes, parkways, and pedestrian walkways. Sub SC PK C is virtually identical, but broken up into two action items instead of just one. C is better broken up, delete this.C-1.4.3.3.1. D-1.4.3.3.2. Where on-street parking is provided or where vehicles are circulation is directed in front of building entries, integrate traffic calming strategies and techniques, such as landscape islands, bulb-outs, and detailed crosswalks, to increase safety and enhance the development character. Sub SC PK Repeat. Stated poorly C-1.4.3.3.3. D-1.4.3.4. Design parking areas, or portions thereof, to accommodate other uses, such as markets, plazas, and other pedestrian-oriented gathering spaces, that temporarily shift focus away from vehicle use and promote pedestrian activity. Sub SC PK Exists in B and D at least, not sure why not C. Wording might just be different and not finding in similar search. Should be all?B-1.5.3.2. D-1.4.3.5. Structured parking facilities should be designed to coordinate vehicular ingress/egress and screen parking levels adjacent to roadways, public spaces, and where visible from residential areas. Use the appropriate architectural guidelines in the Design Manual under sections B, C, or D as appropriate to design parking structure façades. Sub SC PK Requires design review and should fall under architectural standards because the structure will require compliance as a building. Design Review for structure itself, and UDC standards for access/circulation? D-1.5 Public and Open Space Sub SC PO Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-1.5.2.1. To provide a variety of attractive, usable, and integrated public and open spaces that enhance development character, encourage pedestrian use, and contribute to community life and the positive experience of daily activities. Sub SC PO Just a goal…probably similar to others. Combine later if appropriate C-1.5.2.1 D-1.5.3.1.Design public and open spaces as destinations within individual developments and mixed-use areas that provide places for recreation, social gathering, and other pedestrian activities. Sub SC PO C and D. Just need it once?C-1.5.3.1. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)17 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref D-1.5.3.1.1.Provide appropriate types and sizes of public and open spaces, including development amenities, which are proportional to the proposed use and intensity of development.Sub SC PO C and D. Just need it once? See note/question on C C-1.5.3.1.1. D-1.5.3.1.2.The physical form of public and open spaces should not be created from residual land areas; use a planned form with a coherent design that is integrated with the site layout. Sub SC PO Not sure where this should go, but its good to keep in some form. Mostly a sub division issue? D-1.5.3.1.3.Clearly delineate the edges of public, urban, and open spaces. Use building façades, materials, architectural features, landscaping, or other appropriate means to define the edges of public spaces.Sub SC PO Not sure where this should go, but its good to keep in some form, and said like this.B-1.6.3.1.3. D-1.5.3.1.4.Place public and open spaces adjacent or in close proximity to transit facilities, building entries, roadways, pedestrian walkways, and other public spaces and provide pedestrian connections.Sub SC PO Some of these throughout - consolidate?B-1.6.3.1.5. D-1.5.3.1.5. Where appropriate, use public and open spaces to create compatible transitions between different land uses, including adjacent residential areas.Sub SC PO Similar in B and C. Similar in E, but different sub-sect.E-1.4.3.3. D-1.5.3.1.6.Design public spaces to provide visual interest and pedestrian scale that enhances development character and complements adjacent building designs.Sub SC PO I think this has some similar elsewhere…C-1.5.3.1.4. D-1.5.3.2. Incorporate pedestrian-oriented amenities that promote various active and passive uses within public and open spaces. Pedestrian amenities include, but are not limited to, furnishings, landscaping, artwork, lighting, and water features. Sub SC PO B, C, and D similar. Merged B-1.6.3.2. D-1.5.3.2.1.Use decorative pavers or other materials suitable for hardscapes that endure well and add texture, color, pattern, and decoration to public spaces. Sub SC PO B, C, and D B-1.6.3.2.1. D-1.5.3.2.2. Incorporate plantings, trees, and other plant materials to add vertical texture and variety to public spaces; where appropriate, coordinate streetscapes and/or landscaping to maintain a consistent look along roadways. Sub SC PO Exists in B, C, D, and E. Use B wording D-1.5.3.2.3. Provide adequate seating for gathering spaces, along the edges of public and open spaces, or where appropriate to accommodate pedestrian and user activities. Use fixed and/or movable seating, such as benches, low walls, steps, planter and fountain edges, or tables and chairs. Sub SC PO Lot of text for something that seems like in the weeds. Similar to B and C. Delete B-1.6.3.2.3. D-1.5.3.2.4.Incorporate public art as a feature or integrated element of the public space. Where appropriate, incorporate artwork as an integrated component of the building design.Sub SC PO D and E, B and C are very similar. Merged all B-1.6.3.2.4. D-1.5.3.2.5.Include decorative details and elements, such as banners, flags, signs, and planters, which visually enhance the attractiveness and character of the space with additional layers of color and texture.Sub SC PO B, C, D, and E all identical.B-1.6.3.2.5. D-1.5.3.2.6.Where appropriate, provide pedestrian-scaled light fixtures that provide adequate lighting levels to support the intended activities within public and open spaces. Sub SC PO C, D, and E all functionally same. No reason for B not to be included or merged with another idea, if not already B-1.6.3.2.6. D-1.5.3.3.Public and open spaces should maintain pedestrian and user safety and provide secure environments that avoid dead areas, hidden corners, dark areas, and unusable space.Sub SC PO B is better B-1.6.3.3 D-1.6 Landscaping Sub SC LS Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-1.6.1.1. To encourage the attractive and purposeful use of plants and other landscape materials to enhance development character, public and open spaces, parking areas, required buffers, screening, and pedestrian environments. Sub SC LS Same in C and D.C-1.6.1.1 D-1.6.2.1. Use an organizational strategy for landscape plantings to promote aesthetic compositions that enhance development character. Avoid indifferent and unsubstantial plantings, particularly along narrow buffers and setbacks. Sub SC LS Same in C and D. C-1.6.2.1. D-1.6.2.1.1.Use formal planting arrangements, such as regular and linear intervals and geometric patterns, for streetscapes, parkways, public spaces, parks, plazas and squares.Sub SC LS B, C, and D virtually identical B-1.7.3.3.1. D-1.6.2.1.2. Use informal planting arrangements, such as irregular intervals, random patterns and groupings, to create additional interest and focal elements or to produce a natural setting along roadways, pathways and walkways, within public spaces or as buffers and screening between land uses. Sub SC LS Merged intent with B B-1.7.3.3.2. D-1.6.2.2.Integrate landscaping to establish a consistent appearance and aesthetic character for developments and buffers.Sub SC LS Fluff. Similar to C C-1.6.2.2. D-1.6.2.2.1.11-3B Use appropriate classes of trees for parking areas, buffers, screening, public and open spaces and streetscapes to enhance development character. Sub SC LS Similar to B and C. Merge.B-1.7.3.3.3. D-1.6.2.2.2.Consider tree height and canopy diameter at mature growth for spacing and aesthetics as well as watering requirements, maintenance, and soil conditions before selecting species. Sub SC LS Same as merged D-1.6.2.2.1 D-1.6.2.2.3.Landscaping should encourage the appropriate and attractive use of xeric, drought-tolerant plant species and non-plant materials to reduce maintenance and water consumption. Sub SC LS C and D only C-1.6.2.2.2. D-1.6.2.2.4.Incorporate various plants and non-vegetative materials that provide groundcover and add interest and texture to landscaping compositions. Avoid the extensive use of turf and lawn as groundcover.Sub SC LS C and D only C-1.6.2.2.3. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)18 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref D-1.6.2.2.5.Use planters and planting arrangements that feature seasonal plants, flowers, and ornamental trees to provide accents and focal points.Sub SC LS C and D only C-1.6.2.2.4. D-1.6.2.3. Where appropriate or advantageous to promote pedestrian activity, integrate streetscape profiles along roadways, primary drive aisles, building façades, and public spaces. Use the guidelines for streetscapes from Section B of the Design Manual. Sub SC LS C and D only C-1.6.2.3. D-1.6.2.4. Where possible, development should coordinate landscaping with adjacent properties to establish the use of similar elements that produce a complementary character along roadways, buffers, and public space. Sub SC LS C and D only C-1.6.2.4. D-2.1 Cohesive Design Sub AC CD Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-2.1.2.1. To encourage visually aesthetic building designs that promote quality architectural character and establish built environments that are compatible with existing, planned, and/or anticipated adjacent land uses. Sub AC CD C and D the same. Residential?C-2.1.2.1. D-2.1.3.1. Building designs should appropriately address building scale, mass, and form, and the use of materials, architectural elements, and details to ensure a compatible and aesthetic contribution to the built environment. Sub AC CD B, C, D, and E all share similarities. Merge C-2.1.3.1. D-2.1.3.2.Use fundamental design principles, including but not limited to, composition, order, balance, rhythm, repetition, proportion, and scale, to create a unified building design.Sub AC CD B, C, and D all similar. Merge B-2.1.3.2. D-2.1.3.3.Design building façades that express architectural character and incorporate the use of design principles to unify developments and buildings, and relate to adjacent and surrounding uses.Sub AC CD Same as C C-2.1.3.3. D-2.1.3.3.1. Design all appropriate sides of buildings, including façades that face public roadways, public spaces, other buildings, interior site elements, and adjacent uses, to unify a consistent building design and appearance with the consistent use of materials, elements, and color. Sub AC CD C-2.1.3.3.1. D-2.1.3.4.Building design should enhance public and opens spaces, articulate aesthetic character, and provide human and pedestrian scale.Sub AC CD Similar in B, C, D, and E. Merge all B-2.1.3.3. D-2.1.3.4.1.Design buildings to enhance the attractiveness and appeal of developments, define public and open space, establish community identity, and promote pedestrian environments. Sub AC CD Similar in C, D, and E. More detailed in B. Merge basic level for all C-2.1.3.4.1. D-2.1.3.4.2. Where appropriate, incorporate human and pedestrian scale as integral components of the building design.Sub AC CD Identical in B, C, and D. Similar in E. Merge B-2.1.3.3.2. D-2.1.3.5.Use building design and architecture to promote mixed-use and denser developments as aesthetically pleasing developments throughout the community.Sub AC CD Same in C and D C-2.1.3.5. D-2.1.3.5.1.Building designs are encouraged to use horizontal mixed-use forms to create compact developments.Sub AC CD When is "horizontal" mixed-use compact???? Why is the item under residential list both vertical integrated and horizontal but not here where more appropriate? Merged with E-2.1.3.4.1 and C- 2.1.3.5.1 C-2.1.3.5.1. D-2.2 Building Scale Sub AC BS Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-2.2.1.1. To encourage building designs that appropriately use architectural and human scale to establish compatible physical and visual relationships with adjacent and surrounding developments and reinforce a cohesive architectural character Sub AC BS C, D, and E C-2.2.1.1. D-2.2.2.1.Proposed developments should use proportion and scale to design buildings compatible in height, mass, and form with an appropriate transitional built environment. Sub AC BS C, D, and E similar. Not sure why does not apply to B. May be buried. Merged C-2.2.2.1. D-2.2.2.1.1. Infill, greenfield, and redevelopment proposals should coordinate the placement, orientation, and design of buildings to mitigate and avoid the visual appearance of buildings that present an overwhelming form, mass, and scale. Sub AC BS C, D, and E C-2.2.2.1.1. D-2.2.2.1.2. Multi-building developments are encouraged to produce innovative and creative designs that visually reduce the mass, size, and box form to promote an aesthetic appearance on appropriate façades. Sub AC BS C and D C-2.2.2.1.2. D-2.2.2.1.3.Where appropriate, group or incorporate smaller uses that introduce building modulation and façade articulations along roadways or adjacent to public space to break up building mass and scale.Sub AC BS C and D at least, maybe others C-2.2.2.1.3. D-2.2.2.2.Design and configure buildings to reduce overwhelming and disproportioned architectural scale to establish appropriate relationships to adjacent roadways and uses.Sub AC BS C and D C-2.2.2.2. D-2.2.2.2.1.Development should consider the scale of surrounding buildings, including relationships to residential areas, as well as an appropriate scale for neighborhood environments.Sub AC BS Similar to B, C, and D.C-2.2.2.2. D-2.2.2.2.2. Use variation in building form and proximity to other buildings, including, but not limited to, step- backs, similar roof forms, and building height, to ensure building elements are compatible and/or transition to adjacent uses. Sub AC BS Similar in B, C, D, and E. Merged B-2.2.2.1.3. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)19 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref D-2.2.2.2.3. Where appropriate, establish a hierarchy of building scales that transition from intense to less intense uses, maintain relationships between stages, and provide opportunities to create distinctive areas and “districts.” Sub AC BS C, D, and E similar. Really not sure what the intent is.C-2.2.2.2.3. D-2.2.2.3.Incorporate human scale on appropriate building façades to support an aesthetic architectural character that contributes to the quality of the building design, adjacent buildings and public spaces.Sub AC BS B, C, and D similar. Merged B-2.2.2.3. D-2.2.2.3.1.Use human scale to emphasize fenestration patterns, architectural elements, proportion, materials, and detailing throughout the façade and building design.Sub AC BS B, C, D, and E identical B-2.2.2.3.1. D-2.2.2.3.2.Pedestrian scale is required at the ground or pedestrian level at building entries, along roadways, and adjacent to public spaces. Sub AC BS Similar in B, C, and D. Terminology floats (human vs. ped). Merged B-2.2.2.3.2. D-2.3 Building Form Sub AC BF Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-2.3.1.1.To enhance the visual interest of building designs and promote quality architectural character.Sub AC BF C and D C-2.3.1.1. D-2.3.2.1.Articulate building forms, including, but not limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of visually aesthetic building designs. Sub AC BF B-2.3.2.1. D-2.3.2.1.1. Building façades that face roadways, public spaces, and pedestrian environments should incorporate façade modulations, including, but not limited to, appropriately proportioned projections, recesses, and step-backs that articulate wall planes and break up building masses. Sub AC BF B, C, D, and E are similar. Merged B-2.3.2.1.1. D-2.3.2.2.Incorporate visual and physical distinctions in the building design that enhance building forms, articulate façades, identify entries, and integrate human scale.Sub AC BF B, C, and D. Merged here as core. B changed to focus on multiple building floors C-2.3.2.2. D-2.3.2.2.1.Use divisions, fenestration, architectural elements, details, accent materials, and human scale to articulate building façades that relate to adjacent roadways and uses.Sub AC BF Why in C and D only? This is buried in several other guidelines. Might need to be separated and made core???C-2.3.2.2.1. D-2.3.2.2.2.Where building designs incorporate multiple stories, or equivalent building heights, design upper stories to complement lower stories and create a cohesive building design. Sub AC BF C and D. Similar exist in other sections, grouped with other items. Might need to be separated.C-2.3.2.2.2. D-2.3.2.2.3. Use horizontal and vertical divisions in wall planes to organize fenestration as integrated elements of façade compositions, provide visual interest and complexity to the building design, and emphasize the structure or feature architectural elements. Sub AC BF Functionally the same as B-2.3.2.2.1., and identical to one in C. Should all just be same? May need to tweak B/C a bit.C-2.3.2.2.3. D-2.3.2.2.4.Design lower stories to visually anchor buildings to the ground or street and appropriately integrate architectural elements and details that emphasize pedestrian scale.Sub AC BF B, C, and D. Doesn't make sense not to be all, as E still has items related to first floor being larger and more pronounced than second for ped reasons???B-2.3.2.2.2. D-2.3.2.2.5. Design the uppermost story or façade wall planes to complete the building design. Use articulation, architectural elements, materials, and details to emphasize the termination of walls, roof planes, or rooftop elements. Sub AC BF C and D C-2.3.2.2.5. D-2.3.2.3. Building designs should establish visual connections that relate internal spaces at ground- or street- level with adjacent roadways, public spaces, and pedestrian environments. Multistory buildings should provide more transparency at ground or street level than upper stories. Sub AC BF Wordy objective, and seems duplicative with action item, D-2.3.2.3.1. B-2.3.2.3. D-2.3.2.3.1. Use architectural elements, such as doors and windows, details, and materials to articulate building façades that face roadways, or are adjacent to public spaces and pedestrian environments to establish a transparent relationship between active indoor and outdoor spaces. Sub AC BF Really, "Use doors and windows"??? Groundbreaking!B-2.3.2.3.1. D-2.3.2.5. Building roof types, forms, and elements should provide variation and interest to building profiles and contribute to the architectural identity of buildings without imposing overwhelming scale on adjacent uses. Sub AC BF B, C, and D B-2.3.2.5. D-2.3.2.5.1. Building designs should incorporate appropriate roof forms with primary and secondary roof elements that complement the building form and façade designs and help reduce the appearance of building mass and scale. Sub AC BF B, C, and D B-2.3.2.5.1. D-2.3.2.5.2. Where appropriate, modulate and/or articulate roof types, both flat and sloped, with roof elements, including, but not limited to, parapets, dormers, overhangs, and eaves, architectural detailing, and cornice work. Sub AC BF B, C, and D B-2.3.2.5.2. D-2.4 Architectural Elements Sub AC AE Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-2.4.1.1. To integrate architectural elements and details as components of cohesive building designs that enhance the visual interest of building façades, support activity at and/or near ground level, and provide human and pedestrian scale. Sub AC AE B, C, and D similar. Merge B-2.4.1.1. D-2.4.2.1. Use architectural elements and detailing, including, but not limited to, fenestration patterns, awnings, canopies, balconies, entries, materials, and decorative or ornamental detailing, to articulate façades and contribute to an aesthetic building character. Sub AC AE Identical to C, similar to B.C-2.4.2.1. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)20 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref D-2.4.2.1.1.Design and articulate architectural elements using proportions, divisions, detailing, materials, textures, and colors that appropriately integrate these elements with the building design.Sub AC AE Exists in all B, C, D, and E. Just needs to be core guidelines.B-2.4.2.1.1. D-2.4.2.1.2. Provide architectural elements and detailing that emphasize human scale throughout the building design. Human scale that uses a high level of design and detailing is required at ground or street level adjacent to roadways, pedestrian environments, and public spaces. Sub AC AE Functionally the same as B C-2.4.2.1.2. D-2.4.2.1.3. Where appropriate, provide building overhangs or other similar features, such as canopies and awnings, that offer temporary relief from inclement weather along portions of façades that adjoin pedestrian environments. Sub AC AE Identical to C, similar to B.C-2.4.2.1.3. D-2.4.2.1.4. Integrate strategically located elements as focal points in building designs. Focal elements should be proportional to the building scale and emphasize building corners, entries, adjacent public spaces, and other such features to establish development or building identity. Sub AC AE B, C, and D similar. Merge B-2.4.2.1.4. D-2.4.2.2. Building designs should not create blank wall segments along roadways or adjacent to public space. Use architectural elements and detailing in combination with color palettes, textural changes, and material combinations to mitigate the stark appearance of blank walls. Landscaping techniques may also be considered. Sub AC AE B, C, and D all similar B-2.4.2.2. D-2.4.2.3. Organize and locate building service equipment, including, but not limited to, mechanical units, flutes, and vents, away from building entries, roadways, public spaces, and where possible from adjacent buildings. Sub AC AE B, C, and D all similar B-2.4.2.3. D-2.4.2.3.1.Use integrated architectural elements to provide adequate screening and appropriately conceal service equipment and areas. Sub AC AE Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.4.2.3.1. D-2.4.2.3.2.Screen service equipment at ground level from pedestrian and vehicular view to a minimum height of the equipment on all sides and integrate with the building design and site layout.Sub AC AE Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential C-2.4.2.3.2. D-2.4.2.3.3. Screen service and building equipment that is attached or on top of structures from public view. Use pedestrian lines of sight from the farthest edge of the adjoining right-of-way to determine the height and effectiveness of screening. Sub AC AE B, C, and D all similar B-2.4.2.3.3. D-2.4.2.3.4. Use screening techniques, architectural elements, and materials that are consistent with the building design and do not detract from the aesthetic appearance of the building and adequately conceal equipment. Sub AC AE Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.4.2.3.4. D-2.5 Materials Sub AC MA Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-2.5.1.1.To encourage the use of quality materials that promote aesthetic building designs and appropriate contributions to the development of a timeless community character.Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.5.1.1. D-2.5.2.1.Buildings with façades that face multiple roadways and/or public spaces should use consistent material combinations, quality, and detailing to unify the building design. Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.1. D-2.5.2.2.Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design. Use materials from the following basic groups: wood, masonry, concrete, metal, and glazing.Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.2. D-2.5.2.2.1.Select a combination that emphasizes a finished composition and enhances human scale for lower stories and pedestrian scale at ground level. Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.5.2.2.1. D-2.5.2.2.2. Concrete masonry that provides texture, interest, and detail may be appropriate for building designs; however, the use of ordinary, smooth face block, unfinished, colored, or painted, is not an acceptable finish material for building façades along roadways, adjacent to public spaces, and residential areas. Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.5.2.2.2. D-2.5.2.2.3. Use well-detailed, proportioned, and durable materials that will weather and age gracefully, adding to the architectural character over time. Avoid non-durable materials that deteriorate quickly and require frequent maintenance or replacement. Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.2.3. D-2.5.2.2.4.Create interest and variety in façade design to establish attractive architectural character and human scale. Sub AC MA B, C, and D all similar B-2.5.2.2.4. D-2.5.2.2.5.Provide pattern, texture, and detail in the building design and distinguish field materials from accent materials.Sub AC MA B, C, D, and E similar B-2.5.2.2.5. D-2.5.2.3. Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. (For example, stone or stone-like products should convey the appearance of mass and should not appear as a thin veneer.) Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.3. D-2.5.2.4.Use colors that complement the use of building materials and support innovative and good design practices.Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4. D-2.5.2.4.1. The use of subtle, neutral, and natural tones for field materials should complement accent colors and materials. The use of deep earth tones or saturated colors to distinguish building façades should enhance the building design and be compatible with adjacent structures. Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4.1. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)21 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref D-2.5.2.4.2.The use of intensely bright and fluorescent colors, as well as the widespread use of saturated hues without complementary colors, materials, and accents, is discouraged.Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4.2. D-2.5.2.4.3. Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as metal or reflective glazing, should be reviewed and evaluated with the Planning staff to minimize glare on roadways, public spaces, and adjacent uses and to determine appropriateness. Sub AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4.3. D-2.6 Signs and Lighting Sub AC SL Just a heading that will exist where appropriate D-2.6.2.1.To encourage the use of signs and architectural lighting as integrated elements of building and site designs that contribute to the atmosphere of quality, aesthetic built environments.Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.2.1. D-2.6.3.1.Where appropriate, use lighting on building exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environments along roadways, at intersections, and in public spaces.Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.1. D-2.6.3.1.1.Coordinate lighting fixture spacing and height along streetscapes and roadways to avoid conflicts with tree plantings.Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.1.1. D-2.6.3.1.2.The use of architectural lighting is encouraged to be energy-efficient and easily maintained, in addition to providing attractive qualities to building character and public spaces.Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.1.2. D-2.6.3.1.3.Lighting fixtures used on building exteriors should be integrated with building design and coordinate with architectural elements and building entries.Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.1.3. D-2.6.3.2. Signs should complement building designs and be integral with architectural elements and materials. Relate the size, shape, materials, details, and illumination to a pedestrian scale as appropriate, in addition to accommodating vehicles. Sub AC SL Similar to B and C. Merged C-2.6.3.2. D-2.6.3.2.1.Provide signs to identify individual storefronts, buildings and uses along roadways, pedestrian environments, and within developments. Avoid large, single signs with multiple tenants.Sub AC SL Similar to B, C, and D. Merged B-2.6.3.2.1. D-2.6.3.2.2.Use corporate and business logos to identify developments and businesses along roadways, pedestrian environments, and adjacent to public spaces .Sub AC SL Exists in C and D C-2.6.3.2.2. D-2.6.3.2.3.Use appropriately scaled signs that incorporate logos, minimize or eliminate the use of large amounts of text, and are compatible with the architectural character and design of the building. Sub AC SL Exists in C and D C-2.6.3.2.3. D-2.6.3.2.4. Where buildings are brought up close to roadways, pedestrian environments, and public spaces, use appropriate urban sign types consistent with the UDC standards that address pedestrian sight lines in addition to vehicular traffic. Sub AC SL Functionally same as C. Doesn’t seem to add much. Merged C-2.6.3.2.4. D-2.6.3.2.5.Decorative flags and banners should promote the identity of place and enhance the character and attractiveness of buildings and public spaces rather than advertise.Sub AC SL Addressed in first occurrence for all but residential B-2.6.3.2.6. D-3.1.3.1. To encourage the appropriate development of Neighborhood Centers throughout the City as expressed in the Comprehensive Plan, including the incorporation of higher residential densities, integrated public space, and small-scale commercial within a mixed-use environment compatible with the surrounding area. Sub SPC NC This entire N.C. section is ignored. Consider these as a sub category of Site character, rather than under Architectural. Addressed in Comp Plan, but UDC is where this does not happen, and which causes problems for design review later (too late) D-3.1.4.1.Develop Neighborhood Centers under a single concept or master plan to ensure a unified character and seamless development buildout that avoids the piecemeal appearance of separated uses. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.1.1. Where a Neighborhood Center designation consists of multiple property owners, the applicant shall coordinate with the property owners to develop a concept or master plan for the entire land use designation. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.1.2. Concept or master plans should identify the size and boundaries of the Neighborhood Center and establish the relationships between the proposed types and intensities of uses as well as appropriate transitions to adjacent areas. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.1.3. The concept or master plan should clearly communicate the following: site access, internal circulation patterns, connectivity to adjacent uses, site organization and building orientations, parking areas, and public or common spaces. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.2. Use the Neighborhood Center Concept Diagram in the Comprehensive Plan or a similar concept to organize the following general land uses: a core commercial area, residential areas, and public uses within Neighborhood Center designations on the Future Land Use Map. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.3.Provide compact commercial and office developments oriented toward the daily needs of residents, including small-scale retail, entertainment, and office, including local and professional services.Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.3.1.Core areas are encouraged to use vertically integrated mixed-use forms that reinforce an appropriate street character and pedestrian orientation.Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.3.2.Commercial cores and mixed-use areas should be centrally located to allow convenient access for adjacent and nearby residents. Sub SPC NC N.C. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)22 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref D-3.1.4.4.Use appropriate densities and mixed-use environments to provide and distribute a variety of housing options within the Neighborhood Center.Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.4.1. Appropriately use residential housing types to transition from higher densities at the commercial core to medium and low densities at the edge of the Neighborhood Center, as indicated on the Future Land Use Map. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.5. Provide public uses such as parks, plazas, and common greens, as well as public and quasi public buildings, to serve residents. Distribute these public spaces appropriately throughout the Neighborhood Center. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.5.1.Provide a large plaza or green space adjacent to the commercial core as a focal element of the Neighborhood Center, and design this space to accommodate various pedestrian activities.Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.5.2. Create and distribute smaller public and common spaces throughout the Neighborhood Center, including, but not limited to, parks, playgrounds, sports and multiuse fields, and sheltered areas with tables or seating. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.5.3. Connect public and common spaces within an overall circulation system that accommodates pedestrian mobility. Use enhanced streetscapes, parkways, dedicated bicycle lanes, pathways, trails, and other pedestrian-oriented passages. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.6. Develop a recognizable, formalized, and interconnected street network that provides convenient internal circulation and parallel routes that encourage local trips to minimize vehicle use on arterial roadways. (See Manual Section B. Design Guidelines for Urban Developments for street network guidelines.) Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.6.1.Street networks should converge on site access points, core commercial areas, schools, parks, and other public uses. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.6.2.Provide safe, attractive, and accessible street crossings throughout the Neighborhood Center that are appropriately located and integrated into the pedestrian circulation system. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.6.3.Where roadways connect Neighborhood Center development with adjacent uses and residential areas, design these connections as attractive entrances and identifying elements.Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.7.Orient commercial, office, and residential buildings along roadways and/or adjacent to public spaces to establish an attractive neighborhood character and create an appropriate street presence.Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.7.1.Neighborhood Centers are encouraged to design a “main street” environment to anchor the commercial core and expand uses outward within an appropriate street network. Sub SPC NC N.C. D-3.1.4.7.2.Building orientations and site layout should frame public and open spaces to create view sheds and focal points for residential and commercial areas.Sub SPC NC N.C. E-1.1 Coherent Plan Res SC CP Just a heading that will exist where appropriate E-1.1.2.1.To encourage attractive, livable residential developments and neighborhoods that are integrated and compatible with adjacent uses.Res SC CP Residential goal. Livable is more important than attractive E-1.1.3.1. Residential developments should establish appropriate orientations to surrounding uses, including residential and non-residential areas, that encourage compatible development patterns, character, and appearances. Res SC CP Not sure this says much. Restates sub guidelines E-1.1.3.1.1.Develop a concept plan to demonstrate compatibility with adjacent uses and the cohesiveness of individual project components. Use master plans for phased and multiple-site developments.Res SC CP This really seems like something that applies to all?D-1.1.3.1.1. E-1.1.3.1.2.Where appropriate, coordinate with adjacent uses, including single project phases, to promote the development of a cohesive neighborhood. Res SC CP This is pretty similar to a generic one in C, which is better said.C-1.1.3.1.4. E-1.1.3.1.3.Avoid piecemeal and fragmented development that detracts from the establishment of an aesthetic neighborhood appearance and character. Res SC CP Core guideline? C, D, and E C-1.1.3.1.3. E-1.1.3.1.4.Residential developments should create a pleasant, comfortable, and safe place to live that is integrated within a neighborhood and the community.Res SC CP UDC does not require a mix of housing types except for TN-R and PD process. E-1.1.3.2.Residential developments are encouraged to provide a mix of housing types to promote non- homogeneous neighborhoods capable of accommodating a wide range of residents. Res SC CP Is there value with this for general residential (large scale sub divisions)? Reworded to be independent from sub guideline. E-1.1.3.2.1.Where appropriate, use this mix to provide transitions in scale between higher-density and lower- density areas.Res SC CP Reworded to be stand alone.E-1.1.3.2. E-1.1.3.3.Anticipate the addition of future transit systems to the transportation network and plan for the integration of appropriate facilities and infrastructure. Res SC CP Identical in D and E, similar in others. Core?D-1.1.3.2. E-1.1.3.3.1.Coordinate routes, placement of facilities, and infrastructure improvements with the appropriate transportation authorities and any adopted or accepted long-range plans.Res SC CP Similar in all B-1.1.3.2.1. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)23 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref E-1.1.3.4.Where appropriate, incorporate and enhance significant natural features as site amenities and/or design elements. Res SC CP Exists in C, D, and E. probably in E though written differently. Core?C-1.1.3.3. E-1.1.3.5. Appropriately address the critical issues of site layout that influence a compatible and integrated neighborhood character, including, but not limited to, vehicular access, pedestrian connectivity, building orientations, and common spaces. Res SC CP More of a goal…zero specifics here. Variations exist in all sections. "merged" thoughts.B-1.1.3.3. E-1.2 Access and Connectivity Res SC AC Just a heading that will exist where appropriate E-1.2.2.1.To promote the interconnectivity of the community and reduce the impacts that vehicles impose on the physical and visual character of residential developments. Res SC AC Likely a repeat from earlier section that just needs to be reworded more generically E-1.2.2.2.To encourage residential developments that provide multiple and accessible mobility options.Res SC AC Likely a repeat from earlier section that just needs to be reworded more generically E-1.2.3.1. Limit street connections for residential developments off major roadways, including highways, principle arterials, and other designated mobility corridors, to mitigate development impacts on the roadway system. Res SC AC Same thing as C. Mention residential in C.C-1.2.3.1 E-1.2.3.1.1.Provide vehicular access from secondary roadways for sites adjacent to major roadways. Res SC AC C-1.2.3.1.2. E-1.2.3.1.2.Limit street connections on arterial roadways to strategic locations, such as residential and commercial entries and secondary roadways. Res SC AC Applies to big development and small site stuff…is there a core guideline for this elsewhere??? E-1.2.3.2. Residential developments should establish an appropriate street network, roadway system, or circulation pattern that provides connectivity with adjacent uses and promotes contiguous pedestrian environments. Res SC AC E-1.2.3.2.1.Provide safe and attractive connections within and between developments and adjoining uses that reduce vehicular use, promote walkability, and support access to transit.Res SC AC E-1.2.3.2.2. Residential developments should connect with adjacent existing or planned developments and design integrated connections that provide options to walk, bike, and/or drive without the necessity to use arterial and major roadways. Res SC AC D is better. D-1.2.3.1.6 and D-1.2.3.1.7 D-1.2.3.1.6 E-1.2.3.2.3. Coordinate and design connections to adjacent residential and non-residential developments that provide accommodations for pedestrians and incorporate streetscapes or landscaping to create attractive links between uses. Res SC AC E-1.2.3.2.4.Residential development entryways should align across primary roadways to form controlled intersections. Coordinate intersections with the transportation authority as appropriate. Res SC AC D is much better D-1.2.3.2.4 E-1.2.3.2.5.Attractive well-designed and integrated entryways that express a sense of arrival are encouraged.Res SC AC D-1.2.3.1.6 and D-1.2.3.1.7 are better. Kind of a duh anyways, development want this.D-1.2.3.1.6 E-1.2.3.2.6. Integrate pedestrian routes with site circulation patterns that converge on development amenities, common and open spaces, and transit facilities and provide connections to parking areas, sidewalks, pathways and roadways. Res SC AC Repeated in several forms throughout. D-1.2.3.1.6 and D-1.2.3.1.7, and E-1.2.3.2.1 E-1.2.3.2.1 E-1.2.3.2.7. Incorporate and coordinate connections through buffers and other barriers that would otherwise separate and cut off access from residential development to adjacent non-residential and neighborhood uses. Res SC AC Current Planning staff to revise pedestrian walkway standards in UDC 11-3A-19A4. Very important. E-1.2.3.3.Plan for access and connectivity to future transit facilities, including, but not limited to, park-and- ride locations, pullouts, stops, and shelters. Res SC AC Exists in C, D, and E. Similar in E.C-1.2.3.4. E-1.2.3.3.1.Coordinate with the appropriate agencies and organizations to ensure successful integration of transit facilities and infrastructure as integrated elements of the development. Res SC AC I think that C-1.2.3.4. / E-1.2.3.3. implies this. E-1.2.3.3.2.Provide appropriate pedestrian connections from adjacent use, common spaces, and along roadways that allow convenient access to transit facilities.Res SC AC Covered elsewhere I think E-1.3 Orientation and Layout Res SC OL Just a heading that will exist where appropriate E-1.3.1.1.To encourage proposed residential developments to become integral parts of neighborhoods and the community rather than separated or isolated areas. Res SC OL Goal E-1.3.1.2. To ensure that site organization, including, but not limited to, the placement and orientation of buildings, structures, and public spaces, as well as the location and layout of services, establishes an appropriate residential development character. Res SC OL Similar exists in all. Core?B-1.4.1.1 E-1.3.2.1. Residential developments should establish an appropriate organizing framework of roadways and pedestrian walkways that provide an internal circulation network, which promotes vehicular and pedestrian mobility, parallel routes, and connectivity to adjacent uses. Res SC OL This category seems like it doesn't need to be in DM. Kind of fluff E-1.3.2.1.1.Circulation should link residential areas to neighborhood places, including, but not limited to, common and open spaces, schools, parks, transit facilities, and nearby retail uses.Res SC OL Very important…hate seeing dead end paths or access points unfinished or lead to nowhere, while parks and open space lack connectivity. Not just about using left over fragments of space to meet OS requirements. I'd like to see consolidated open space to be required as "centralized" or within some distance of furthest parcel via ped infrastructure (does not have to be central on small developments). Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)24 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref E-1.3.2.1.2.Where appropriate, incorporate traffic calming strategies that increase neighborhood safety and provide opportunity to enhance the character of roadways and streetscapes.Res SC OL When would traffic calming become a consideration? When they're creating the sub division layout??? E-1.3.2.2. Locate buildings to establish an appropriate development character that enhances the compatibility and attractiveness of the site, adjacent uses, and neighborhood. (Note: This guideline is not intended for individual single-family dwellings.) Res SC OL Similar exists in all. Revisions from other section text. All sub items really deal with setbacks though, and less about orientation.B-1.4.2.1. E-1.3.2.2.1. Appropriately use setbacks or bring buildings up close to roadways to establish a uniform street presence and support a contiguous pedestrian environment. Orient primary building façades toward roadways and provide walkways that connect entrances. Res SC OL Residential only? Similar in C/D, but different intent.C-1.3.2.1.1. E-1.3.2.2.2. In addition to the establishment of a street presence, developments should create appropriate relationships to surrounding uses, including residential areas that integrate a mixture of mitigation and enhancement techniques, but not limited to screening. Res SC OL Exists in D and E. Not sure of value…D-1.3.3.2.2. E-1.3.2.2.3.Limit the distance from buildings to roadways and provide appropriate distances between buildings to maintain interconnectivity and convenient walking distances for pedestrians. Res SC OL E-1.3.2.2.4. Multibuilding developments may place buildings away from roadways if a minimum of 40 percent of the buildable frontage is occupied by building façades and/or public space that establish an aesthetically consistent street presence. Res SC OL C, D, and E C-1.3.2.1.3. E-1.3.2.2.5.Use buildings that incorporate articulated façades and architectural elements to anchor site corners at intersections.Res SC OL Functionally same in all sections. Doesn’t really seem to fit with other guidelines in this header, either B-1.4.2.1.4. E-1.3.2.3.Strategically locate common and open spaces and site amenities to encourage and support pedestrian activity. Res SC OL Some of it seems like way before DM (plats), and some of it seems way before DM. If not addressed early to some level though, it lacks the structure to do right later. E-1.3.2.3.1.Organize buildings around common space and site amenities to create a sense of enclosure and delineate space for the activities and uses.Res SC OL E-1.3.2.3.2. Use building façades, enhanced streetscapes, or other appropriate enhancements to frame public spaces and site amenities as focal points within developments and to delineate or distinguish between public and private areas. Res SC OL Move to multi-family. Don't understand why building façade elements and streetscape is under a section on locating common/open space, in residential (if Urban, then sure). Certainly not required when we allow a very large portion of open space to not even be useable (stripped out along roads and associated with drainage) E-1.3.2.3.3.Orient common spaces and site amenities toward roadways, adjacent to building entries, pedestrian environments, and streetscapes, or as separations between adjacent uses. Res SC OL Move to multi-family. Probably said similiarly elsewhere. Try and merge if makes sense E-1.3.2.4. Where provided, parking should be located toward the interior of the site and integrate with buildings and common spaces. (Note: This guideline is not intended for individual single-family dwellings.) Res SC OL Move to multi-family. This seems like a DM thing, but I know we get concept plans sometimes way early and it could be missed or bad design allowed unintentionally without UDC too? E-1.3.2.4.1. Parking should not be a dominant feature along roadways; place parking areas away from site corners, primarily to the rear and/or side of buildings to minimize the visibility of parking areas from roadways. Res SC OL Move to multi-family. This seems like a DM thing, but I know we get concept plans sometimes way early and it could be missed or bad design allowed unintentionally without UDC too? E-1.3.2.4.2.Distribute parking into smaller areas around, between, and behind structures to shorten the distance to buildings, pedestrian walkways, common spaces, site amenities, and roadways. Res SC OL Move to multi-family. This seems like a DM thing, but I know we get concept plans sometimes way early and it could be missed or bad design allowed unintentionally without UDC too? E-1.3.2.4.3. Parking should not interfere with common open spaces and amenities or safe pedestrian circulation. Res SC OL Move to multi-family. This seems like a DM thing, but I know we get concept plans sometimes way early and it could be missed or bad design allowed unintentionally without UDC too? E-1.3.2.5.Where possible, coordinate the placement of common spaces and site amenities with adjacent properties to encourage integrated developments and support community connectivity. Res SC OL Move to multi-family. This seems like a DM thing, but I know we get concept plans sometimes way early and it could be missed or bad design allowed unintentionally without UDC too? E-1.3.2.6.Site services and building utilities should not distract from the attractiveness of the residential development. (Note: This guideline is not intended for individual single-family dwellings.)Res SC OL Exists all. Mereged. Keep just to note exclusion of individual???B-1.4.2.6. E-1.3.2.6.1.Place and orient services and utilities away from roadways, common spaces, and building entries. Where necessary, appropriately screen services and utilities. Res SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, D, and E. See B B-1.4.2.6.1. E-1.3.2.6.2.Place utility lines underground and away from planting zones whenever possible.Res SC OL Merged ideas in B, C, D, and E. See B B-1.4.2.6.3. E-1.4 Common and Open Space Res SC CO Just a heading that will exist where appropriate E-1.4.2.1. To provide a variety of attractive, usable, and integrated amenities and common and open spaces that enhance development character, are accessible, and contribute to community and residential life and the positive experience of daily activities. Res SC CO UDC work group mentioned. Amenities defined in UDC 11-3G E-1.4.3.1. Provide integrated, usable amenities and common spaces, including parks, playgrounds, bicycle and pedestrian pathways, squares, common greens, gardens, and other such spaces that provide usable spaces for play, recreation, and social or cultural activities. Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup E-1.4.3.2.Design common spaces and amenities to enhance the development character and promote attractive, pedestrian-oriented elements throughout neighborhoods.Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)25 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref E-1.4.3.2.1.Provide appropriate types and sizes of amenities and common spaces that are proportional to the proposed use and intensity of development.Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup E-1.4.3.2.2.The physical form of common and open spaces should not be created from residual land areas; use a planned form with a coherent design that is integrated with the development and neighborhood. Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup E-1.4.3.2.3.Common spaces and amenities should be centrally located or distributed throughout a development with safe walkable routes that provide access for all residents. Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup E-1.4.3.2.4.Link multiple common spaces and facilities throughout the development with pedestrian pathways and parkways.Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup E-1.4.3.2.5.Place common spaces adjacent or in close proximity to transit facilities, building entries, roadways, pedestrian walkways, and other public spaces and provide pedestrian connections.Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup E-1.4.3.2.6.Residential developments adjacent to planned or existing parks, common and open spaces, or other neighborhood amenities should maximize visibility and pedestrian access to these areas.Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup E-1.4.3.2.7.Clearly delineate the edges of common and open spaces. Use building façades, materials, architectural features, landscaping, or other appropriate means to define the edges of spaces.Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup E-1.4.3.2.8.Frame common spaces with building façades, landscaping, and/or streetscapes to create a sense of enclosure.Res SC CO This seems like a DM thing, but concept plans much earlier and could be allowed unintentionally? Staff currently looking at the open standards via the UDC workgroup E-1.4.3.3.Where appropriate, use common and open spaces to create compatible transitions between different land uses within a development or neighborhood.Res SC CO Generic residential D-1.5.3.1.5. E-1.4.3.4. Incorporate pedestrian-oriented amenities that promote various active and passive uses within common spaces. Pedestrian amenities include, but are not limited to, furnishings, landscaping, artwork, lighting, and water features. Res SC CO Exists in B, C, D, and E similiar. Merge B-1.6.3.2. E-1.4.3.4.1.Use decorative pavers or other materials for hardscapes that endure well and add texture, color, pattern, and decoration to public spaces. Res SC CO Exists in B, C, D, and E similiar. Merge B-1.6.3.2.1. E-1.4.3.4.2. Incorporate plantings, trees, and other plant materials to add vertical texture and variety to public spaces; where appropriate, coordinate streetscapes and/or landscaping to maintain a consistent look along roadways. Res SC CO Exists in B, C, D, and E similiar. Merge B-1.6.3.2.2. E-1.4.3.4.3. Provide adequate seating for gathering spaces along the edges of public and open spaces or where appropriate to accommodate pedestrian and user activities. Use fixed and/or movable seating, such as benches, low walls, steps, planter and fountain edges, or tables and chairs. Res SC CO Exists in B, C, D, and E similiar. Merge B-1.6.3.2.3. E-1.4.3.4.4.Incorporate public art as a feature or integrated element of the public space. Where appropriate, incorporate artwork as an integrated component of the building design.Res SC CO D and E, B and C are very similar. Merged all B-1.6.3.2.4. E-1.4.3.4.5.Include decorative details and elements, such as banners, flags, signs, and planters, which visually enhance the attractiveness and character of the space with additional layers of color and texture.Res SC CO B, C, D, and E all identical.B-1.6.3.2.5. E-1.4.3.4.6.Where appropriate, provide pedestrian-scaled light fixtures that provide adequate lighting levels to support the intended activities within public and open spaces.Res SC CO C, D, and E all functionally same. No reason for B not to be incldued or merged with another idea, if not already C-1.5.3.2.6. E-1.4.3.4.7.Provide convenient bicycle parking, based on a proportional use and activity level, for common spaces and amenities.Res SC CO This is kind of universal… E-1.4.3.5.Residential roadways are encouraged to incorporate detached sidewalks with parkway planting strips to accommodate canopy-producing street trees.Res SC CO UDC has some requirements, but I don't know that it encourages? E-1.4.3.6. Encourage safe and secure amenities and common and open spaces by avoiding the creation of dead areas, unusable spaces, dark areas, and hidden corners. Provide public and neighborhood views for casual monitoring of common spaces and facilities. Res SC CO E-2.1 Cohesive Design Res AC CD Just a heading that will exist where appropriate E-2.1.2.1. To encourage visually aesthetic residential building designs that promote quality architectural character and establish built environments that are compatible with existing adjacent and planned uses. Res AC CD Just a goal. Similar to others including C-2.1.2.1.B-2.1.2.1. E-2.1.3.1. Building designs should appropriately address building scale, mass, and form, and the use of materials, architectural elements and details to ensure a compatible and aesthetic contribution to neighborhood development. Res AC CD B, C, D, and E all share similiarities. Merge B-2.1.3.1. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)26 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref E-2.1.3.2. Design building façades that express architectural character and incorporate the fundamental design principles, including but not limited to, composition, order, balance, rhythm, repetition, proportion, and scale, to create a unified building design. Design all appropriate sides of buildings, including façades that face roadways and drive aisles, public and common spaces, other buildings, and adjacent uses to create an attractive appearance and unify the building design with the consistent use of materials, elements, and color. Res AC CD First part of this should be same for all. Second part is similar to most others but a separate guidelines. No reason to be mashed into one long one C-2.1.3.3. E-2.1.3.3.Building designs should enhance public and common spaces, articulate aesthetic character, and provide human and pedestrian scale.Res AC CD Similar in B, C, D, and E. Merge all B-2.1.3.3. E-2.1.3.3.1.Design buildings to enhance the attractiveness and appeal of developments, define street presence, public and common spaces, and contribute to neighborhood identity.Res AC CD Similar in C, D, and E. More detailed in B. Merge basic level for all C-2.1.3.4.1. E-2.1.3.3.2.Incorporate human and pedestrian scale as integral components of the building design to enhance the attractiveness and appeal of buildings and residential areas.Res AC CD Identical in B, C, and D. Similar in E. Merge B-2.1.3.3.2. E-2.1.3.4.Where appropriate, use building design and architecture to promote aesthetically pleasing mixed- use developments within neighborhoods.Res AC CD Doesn't say much… E-2.1.3.4.1 Building designs are encouraged to use vertically integrated mixed-use structures and/or horizontal mixed-use forms to create compact developments.Res AC CD Similar to D but more detailed. If the intent is compact form, how does horizontal mixed-use help?D-2.1.3.5.1. E-2.2 Building Scale Res AC BS Just a heading that will exist where appropriate E-2.2.1.1. To encourage building designs that appropriately use architectural and human scale to establish compatible physical and visual relationships with adjacent buildings and buildings and reinforce a cohesive architectural character. Res AC BS C-2.2.1.1. E-2.2.2.1. Infill, greenfield, and redevelopment proposals should coordinate the placement, orientation, and design of residential buildings to mitigate and avoid the visual appearance of an imposing scale that presents an overwhelming form and mass. Res AC BS C, D, and E C-2.2.2.1.1. E-2.2.2.1.1.Residential designs should use proportion and scale to create buildings that are compatible in height, mass, and form with adjacent structures and uses.Res AC BS C, D, and E similar.C-2.2.2.1. E-2.2.2.1.2.In a suburban context, building height and scale should be similar to that of other buildings in the surrounding area and avoid a dominant appearance along street frontages and roadways.Res AC BS Why is this needed? The previous / merged guideline said it needed to be compatible. Is this even about residential, or other buildings next to residential? E-2.2.2.1.3.Where development permits an increase in height and/or density, residential building designs should mitigate the visual impacts of an imposing scale on adjacent structures.Res AC BS Why is this needed? The previous / merged guideline said it needed to be compatible. Is this even about residential, or other buildings next to residential? E-2.2.2.2.Appropriately use scale and massing to create building forms that express compatible architectural interest and provide transitions to adjacent buildings and uses. Res AC BS Why is this needed? The previous / merged guideline said it needed to be compatible. Is this even about residential, or other buildings next to residential? E-2.2.2.2.1.Design residential buildings that break up and distribute massing with various wall planes, roof configurations, and architectural elements that reduce imposing building height and scale.Res AC BS E-2.2.2.2.2. Use variation in building form and proximity to other buildings, including, but not limited to, step- backs, similar roof forms, and building height, to ensure building elements are compatible with or transition to adjacent uses. Res AC BS Similar in B, C, D, and E. Merged B-2.2.2.1.3. E-2.2.2.3. Where appropriate, establish a hierarchy of building scales to transition from higher density to lower density; maintain relationships between hierarchy levels to promote opportunities to create distinctive areas within neighborhoods. Res AC BS C, D, and E similar. Really not sure what the intent is.C-2.2.2.2.3. E-2.2.2.4. Incorporate human scale on all appropriate building façades to support an aesthetic architectural character that contributes to the quality of the building design, adjacent buildings, and public spaces. Res AC BS Similar to others B-2.2.2.3 E-2.2.2.4.1.Use human scale to emphasize fenestration patterns, architectural elements, proportion, materials, and detailing throughout the façade and building design.Res AC BS B, C, D, and E identical B-2.2.2.3.1. E-2.3 Building Form Res AC BF Just a heading that will exist where appropriate E-2.3.2.2.3.Provide taller ceiling heights for ground-floor façades where 30 percent or more of the square footage is above the ground floor.Res AC BF E-2.4 Architectural Elements Res AC AE Just a heading that will exist where appropriate E-2.5 Materials Res AC MA Just a heading that will exist where appropriate E-2.5.2.1.Buildings with façades that face multiple roadways and/or public spaces should use consistent material combinations, quality, and detailing to unify the building design. Res AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.1. E-2.5.2.2.1. Use well-detailed, proportioned, and durable materials that weather and age gracefully, adding to the architectural character over time. Avoid nondurable materials that deteriorate quickly and require frequent maintenance or replacement. Res AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.2.3. E-2.5.2.5.Use colors that complement the use of building materials and support innovative and good design practices.Res AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4. Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)27 of 28 Design Manual | Removed Guidelines Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Sect Category Sub-sect Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref E-2.5.2.5.1. The use of subtle, neutral, and natural tones for field materials should complement accent colors and materials. The use of deep earth tones or saturated colors to distinguish building façades should enhance the building design and be compatible with adjacent structures. Res AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4.1. E-2.5.2.5.3. Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as metal or reflective glazing, should be reviewed and evaluated with the Planning staff to minimize glare on roadways, public spaces, and adjacent uses and determine appropriateness. Res AC MA Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4.3. 11-3A-19A.1b Primary Entrance(s): The primary building entrance(s) shall be clearly defined by the architectural design of the building.UDC AE E-2.4.2.2. 11-3A-19A.1e Mechanical Equipment: All ground level mechanical equipment shall be screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property line. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened as viewed from the farthest edge of the adjoining right of way. UDC AE 11-3A-19A.2a Exterior building designs shall demonstrate the appearance and use of high quality materials, including, but not limited to, stone, brick, wood or other natural materials, tinted or textured masonry block, textured or architecturally detailed concrete panels, or stucco or stuccolike synthetic materials. UDC MA B-2.5.2.2.5.Provide pattern, texture, and detail in the building design and distinguish field materials from accent materials. Coherent Plan CP Street Network SN Access & Connectivity AC Orientation & Layout OL Parking PK Public & Open Space PO Streetscape SS Landscaping LS Common & Open Space CO Cohesive Design CD Building Scale BS Building Form BF Architectural Elements AE Materials MA Signs & Lighting SL Neighborhood Centers NC Industrial Developments ID Residential Conversions RC Sub-sect Acronyms: Category: SC=Site Criteria, AC=Architectural Criteria, SPC=Specific Criteria | Sub-sect: See last page. | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)28 of 28 Architectural Standards | Residential @ ID #Current Revision Single Multi Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref I R1.00 Promote visually aesthetic building designs that incorporate quality architectural characteristics and establish built environments that are compatible with existing, planned, and anticipated adjacent land uses. ●●C-2.1.2.1. To encourage visually aesthetic building designs that promote quality architectural character and establish built environments that are compatible with existing, planned, and/or anticipated adjacent land uses. G R1.10 Articulate building designs to frame and accentuate public spaces with pedestrian scale elements and details.●●B-2.1.3.3. Building design should enhance public and urban spaces, articulate an urban form, and provide human and pedestrian scale. S R1.1A Maintain consistent and contiguous pedestrian environments across developments. Limit circuitous connections and maintain clear visibility. ○●B- 2.1.3.3.3. Design building façades that define and articulate an appropriately scaled street wall to maintain contiguous pedestrian environments and support public spaces. S R1.1B Provide pedestrian connections to public spaces.○● Design building façades that define and articulate an appropriately scaled street wall to maintain contiguous pedestrian environments and support public spaces. S R1.1C Buildings must orient, frame, and/or direct pedestrian views to adjacent cultural buildings, parks, and plazas.○●B- 2.1.3.3.1. Design buildings and structures to enhance the attractiveness and appeal of prominent landmarks, civic and cultural buildings, parks, plazas, streetscapes, view corridors, and other public and urban spaces. S R1.1D Design and orient buildings not to impede access. The building should enhance the appeal of open space and pedestrian environments ○●C- 2.1.3.4.1. Design buildings to enhance the attractiveness and appeal of developments, define public and open space, establish community identity, and promote pedestrian environments. S R1.1E Incorporate architectural features on all sides of a building façade facing: the primary entrance(s) of an adjacent building, public roadways, interior site amenities, and façades that are visible from public spaces. See Architectural Elements, Building Form, and Materials sections. ●●C- 2.1.3.3.1. Design all appropriate sides of buildings, including façades that face public roadways, public spaces, other buildings, interior site elements, and adjacent uses, to unify a consistent building design and appearance with the consistent use of materials, elements, and color. G R1.20 Within multi-family developments, enhance wayfinding and create a unique identity for each building, by incorporating complimentary variation in design. ○●Goal created for new standard from UDC, to require variation of buildings.E-2.3.2.5.4. S R1.2A Ensure that no two buildings viewed from a public street or public space are alike, by varying at least two of the following for each building: roof pitches, material types, color packages, structure orientation, or incorporate other unique and identifiable architectural or landscape element (such as art). ○●E- 2.3.2.5.4. Breaking out varying pitches and creating new standards for it, that are more flexible and allow other elements to vary instead. Separated from E-2.3.2.5.4 (roof slopes) and created a new companion Goal.E-2.3.2.5.4. I R3.01 Emphasize architectural building forms that support compatible building scales, provide appealing architectural character, and contribute to the quality of the neighborhood. ●●E-2.3.1.1. To emphasize architectural building forms that support compatible building scales, provide appealing architectural character, and contribute to the quality of the neighborhood. G R3.10 Articulate building forms, including, but not limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of visually aesthetic and well articulated building designs. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public spaces. ●●E-2.3.2.1. Articulate building forms, including, but not limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with appropriately scaled modulations that contribute to the development of visually aesthetic building designs. B, C, D, and E identical. Keep for residential goal B-2.3.2.1. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: Single=Single-Family Residential, Multi=Multi-Family | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)1 of 7 Architectural Standards | Residential @ ID #Current Revision Single Multi Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S R3.1A Provide a complementary and proportionate level of design and detail on all public oriented façades.●●E- 2.3.2.1.2. Residential designs that provide a disproportionate level of design and detail on one or two façades are not appropriate and should display a complementary level of quality, design, and architectural interest on all façades. S R3.1B Incorporate at least one type of modulation in the façade plane, including, but not limited to: projections, recesses, and step backs that articulate wall planes and break up building mass. ●●E- 2.3.2.1.1. 11.3A- 19a.1a Building façades that face roadways, public spaces, and pedestrian environments should incorporate façade modulations, architectural elements, and details that appropriately articulate the building design. B, C, D, and E are similar. Merged B-2.3.2.1.1. S R3.1C For applicable façades equal to or longer than 20-feet, provide a minimum total modulation area of 20% the horizontal wall span, with a minimum vertical height of at least 3-feet. Porches and balconies may count towards this. ●●E- 2.3.2.1.3. Create building forms that provide visual interest, compatibility with adjacent uses, and eliminate the long, flat appearance of walls, box-like building masses, and large, unvaried roofs. S R3.1D Modulation for qualifying projections, pop outs, bays, recesses, and varied setbacks, must be a minimum depth of 1-foot from the primary façade plane. A minimum 50% of total modulation must be visible over permanent barriers, such as berms and fencing, from described areas. ●●E- 2.3.2.1.4. Use modulations in wall planes and floor plans, such as, but not limited to, projections, recesses, varied setbacks, step-backs, and roof heights, to articulate building mass and form. Pretty sure similar elsewhere…might be worth having again in residential though S R3.1E Use any combination of material type, color variation, banding, stringcourse, or modulation to clearly distinguish between the ground level and upper stories. ●●E- 2.3.2.1.5. Residential designs should distinguish between the ground levels and upper stories to articulate building forms and emphasize human scale. S R3.1F Incorporate visually heavier and more massive elements or materials, such as stone or masonry, primarily at the base of buildings, and lighter elements and materials such as siding, above. This excludes columns, supports, modulated walls, architectural features, and roof elements. ●●E- 2.3.2.1.6. Incorporate visually heavier and more massive elements and materials at the base of buildings and lighter elements and materials above. G R3.20 Residential designs should articulate façades into smaller components and break up monotonous wall planes by integrating horizontal and vertical elements. ●●E-2.3.2.2. Residential designs should articulate façades into smaller components and break up monotonous wall planes by integrating horizontal and vertical elements. S R3.2A Use any combination of material, color, modulation, or other articulation to delineate and break up wall planes greater than 20-feet by 10-feet or wall planes exceeding 200 total square feet (whichever is more stringent). Applies to public oriented building façades visible from a public street or public spaces. ●●E- 2.3.2.2.1. Break up two-story walls on the front, sides, and rear façades with changes in materials and color, modulation in form, and architectural elements. S R3.2B Second-story residential façades may not extend to the front face of garage bays without additional façade modulation or additional material types and architectural accents. ●●E- 2.3.2.2.2. Second-story residential façades should avoid extending to the front face of garage bays without additional modulation or architectural elements. S R3.2C Building façades and structures, including detached garages and carports, with a projection depth towards the front property line of more than 30% the primary façade width are not allowed. ●●E- 2.3.2.2.4. Building façades and structures, including detached garages and carports, that extend in a disproportionate horizontal dimension are discouraged and should be designed to mitigate imposing mass, form, and scale. Unclear? Is this saying no snout houses? No examples provided @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: Single=Single-Family Residential, Multi=Multi-Family | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)2 of 7 Architectural Standards | Residential @ ID #Current Revision Single Multi Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S R3.2D Residential buildings with attached units must articulate the design to differentiate façades of individual units or groups of units. Must consistently incorporate any two of the following: modulation, material, or color variation. ●●E-2.3.2.3. Residential buildings with attached units should articulate the design to differentiate façades of individual units or groups of units, particularly where such units are oriented toward a roadway or common space. G R3.30 Design accessory structures to be compatible with residential buildings. Accessory structures include, but are not limited to, sheltered mailboxes, storage areas, maintenance and recreational facilities, detached garages and carports, and secondary dwellings. ●●E-2.3.2.4. Design accessory structures to be compatible with residential buildings. Accessory structures include, but are not limited to, grouped mailboxes, storage areas, maintenance and recreational facilities, detached garages and carports, and secondary dwellings. UDC link? S R3.3A For an accessory structure, 25% or more of the roof surface area must utilize a like material or color of a primary structure, or the structure must share similar roof forms. ●●E- 2.3.2.4.1. Use similar building and roof forms, architectural elements and details, and materials and colors to maintain the quality of the architectural character. S R3.3B For an accessory structure, 25% or more of the non-roof surface area must utilize a like material of a primary structure. Carports and other post type construction are excluded if the roof material complies. ●●E- 2.3.2.4.1. G R3.40 Modulate and articulate roof forms to create building profile interest and to reduce the appearance of building mass and scale. Applies to public oriented façades visible from a public street, public spaces, and pedestrian environments. ●●E-2.3.2.5. Modulate roof forms to add interest to building form and profile and reduce the appearance of building mass and scale. S R3.4A Break up roof massing into primary and secondary roof elements that correspond to horizontal and vertical modulations or divisions in the façade, and denote key architectural elements, such as entries and porches. ●●E- 2.3.2.5.1. Break up roof massing into primary and secondary roof elements that correspond to modulations in the façade and denote key architectural elements, such as entries and porches. S R3.4B For all public oriented façades, provide a complementary and proportionate level of roof form design and detail.●●E- 2.3.2.5.2. Articulate roof forms and elements with architectural detailing and use compatible roof types, slopes, and elements to support a cohesive building design. S R3.4C Align and correlate roof forms including elements over porches and entries, with the overall building design and use of materials. Examples include but are not limited to: continuation of roof forms with vertical elements such as columns, piers, and pilasters, or accenting gable type façades with rafters, corbels, or distinct material variations from other wall planes. ●●E- 2.3.2.5.3. Roof forms, including elements over porches and entries, should be consistent with the building design and use materials that contribute to the architectural character of the building. S R3.4D Sloped roofs shall have a significant pitch, to be no less than 5/12 (22-1/2 deg).○●11-4-3- 27E.4 S R3.4E Sloped roofs must extend at least 12 inches beyond the face of walls.●●E- 2.3.2.5.4. Sloped roofs should vary pitches between structures and extend at least 12 inches beyond the face of walls on all sides. Breaking out varying pitches and creating new standards for it. Should not require different pitches in all cases, for example if orientation, types of materials, and colors vary. Eaves less houses look cheap, but this seems to be trending on narrow lots? Facing public spaces only? S R3.4F Provide variations in roof profile including but not limited at least two of the following: two or more visible roof planes; dormers, lookout, turret, or cornice work such as corbels, spaced consistently along the façade plane. ○●11-3A- 19A.1c Rooflines: Roof design shall provide variations in profile through modulation and/or articulation in accord with the "City Of Meridian Design Manual", including, but not limited to, the following: 1) overhanging eaves; 2) sloped roofs; 3) two or more roof planes; 4) varying parapet heights; and 5) cornices. B-2.3.2.5.2. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: Single=Single-Family Residential, Multi=Multi-Family | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)3 of 7 Architectural Standards | Residential @ ID #Current Revision Single Multi Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref I R4.01 Promote attractive residential units that enhance the quality of neighborhoods and developments by integrating architectural elements and details with building designs. ●●E-2.4.1.1. To promote attractive residential units that enhance the quality of neighborhoods and developments by integrating architectural elements and details with building designs. G R4.10 Use architectural elements and detailing to add interest and contribute to an aesthetic building character. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public spaces. ●●E-2.4.2.1. Use architectural elements and detailing, including, but not limited to, fenestration patterns, awnings, balconies, entries, porches, materials, decorative or ornamental detailing, exposed trusses, roof brackets, window trim, arches and cornices to articulate façades, add interest and contribute to an aesthetic building character. This guideline applies to building façades facing roadways and the perimeter of the subdivision where the rear and side façades are viewed from the adjoining roadways. …long. If DM is not "required", then the required portion should not be here but in the UDC. If its wanted everywhere, but not required everywhere, then good here S R4.1A Provide detailing that transition or frame façade material changes, and that integrate architectural elements such as lighting, doorways and windows. Examples include but are not limited to: cornice work, decorative caps on brick or stone, decorative lintels, porch railing, transom light, and shutters. ●●E- 2.4.2.1.2. Provide architectural elements and detailing that emphasize human scale throughout the building design as appropriate. First portion is same in all. Less detail than B,C, and D. Keep for residential?B-2.4.2.1.2. G R4.20 Strategically locate focal points as key elements within the building design to enhance architectural character. Applies to building façades visible from a public street or public spaces. ●●E-2.4.2.3. Residential buildings adjacent to roadways and public space should strategically locate key elements as focal points within the design to enhance architectural character. S R4.2A Provide details that emphasize focal elements such as building corners, entries, or unique features. Detail examples include but are not limited to: quoin or rustication, canopies, and columns, or using roof lines and modulation to direct views. At least one focal element is required and must be accented with a contrast in color, texture, or modulation of the wall or roof plane. ●●E- 2.4.2.3.1. Focal elements should emphasize building corners, entries, adjacent public spaces, or other such features that enhance the building character or adjacent pedestrian environments. Much lighter on text than B, C, and D, but seems to be the same? Merged ideas. Worth keeping in residential?B-2.4.2.1.4. G R4.30 Incorporate windows into all applicable façade elevations and coordinate their placement and design with other architectural elements and material standards. ●●E-2.4.2.4. Where appropriate, windows should be placed on all elevations and detailed to provide articulation and avoid blank walls. The placement, size, proportions, and details of windows should contribute to the architectural character of the building. Different wording than B, C, and D. Intent is the same but in totally different approach. Seems like the others offer greater flexibility B-2.4.2.2. S R4.3A Windows must be provided to allow views to exterior activity areas or vistas, and must be provided on any façade facing a pedestrian area or common area used for children's recreation. ●●11-4-3- 27E.6 From UDC, 11-4-3-27E.6. Added pedestrian areas if eyes on public spaces is the goal. S R4.3B Anchor windows and other portals into building wall planes by integrating proportional detailing such as trim, lintels, shutters, railing, and ledges into the building design. ●●E- 2.4.2.1.3. Use architectural elements to articulate the fenestration of façades to create balance and order that contribute to the quality and architectural character of the building. Separated E-2.4.2.1.3. into different parts. G R4.40 Residential entries and multifamily stairwells must provide convenient access from parking and pedestrian areas, and be integrated into the overall site and building design. ●●E-2.4.2.5. Multifamily stairwells should be integrated with the building design and provide residents protection from the weather. Use durable materials that contribute to the architectural character. Redefined to be broader and created new standard with specifics from goal. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: Single=Single-Family Residential, Multi=Multi-Family | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)4 of 7 Architectural Standards | Residential @ ID #Current Revision Single Multi Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S R4.4A Primary building entries must be clearly defined using any unique combination of architectural elements, materials, or façade modulation meeting other standards. ●●E-2.4.2.2. 11-3A- 19A.1b 11-4-3- 27E.2 Clearly define and articulate building entries and connect them to roadways and pedestrian walkways. Where appropriate, primary building entries should face roadways or adjacent public space. Meets intent of 11-3A-19A.1b., and similar to 11-4-3- 27E.2 S R4.4B Multifamily structures must provide internal site circulation to access individual residential units.○●E- 2.4.2.5.1. Multifamily structures are encouraged to use internal circulation and stairwells to access individual residential units. S R4.4C Multifamily stairwells must be integrated with the building design and provide residents protection from inclement weather. Use materials, modulation, and architectural elements which relate to and support other standards. ○●11-4-3- 27E.3 New standard using criteria from goal.E-2.4.2.5. I R5.01 Ensure that materials used for residential development promote and establish an architectural character that contributes to the aesthetic qualities of neighborhoods and protects adjacent property values. ●●E-2.5.1.1. To ensure that materials used for residential development promote and establish an architectural character that contributes to the aesthetic qualities of neighborhoods and protects adjacent property values. G R5.10 Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design. Use materials from the following basic groups: wood, masonry, concrete, metal, and glazing. ●●E-2.5.2.2.11-4-3- 27E.5 Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design. Use materials from the following basic groups: wood, masonry, concrete, metal, and glazing. Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.2. S R5.1A For buildings with façades that face multiple public roadways and/or public spaces, use consistent material combinations, material quality, and architectural detailing. ●●B-2.5.2.1. Buildings with façades that face multiple roadways and/or public spaces should use consistent material combinations, quality, and detailing to unify the building design. S R5.1B Distinguish field materials from accent materials through pattern, texture, or additional detail visible from edge of nearest roadway. Alternate masonry or material courses may count towards this. ●●E- 2.5.2.2.2. Provide pattern, texture, and detail in the building design and distinguish field materials from accent materials to create interest and variety in façade design and establish an attractive architectural character. Doesn't seem like this needs any more detail than B, C, or D categories. Actually, seems like it would be the opposite for residential. B-2.5.2.2.5. S R5.1C Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. For example, wrap stone or stone-like products around visible corners to convey the appearance of mass, and not as a thin veneer. ●●E-2.5.2.3. Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance of the material. (For example, stone or stone-like products should convey the appearance of mass and should not appear as a thin veneer.) Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.3. S R5.1D Non-durable materials, treatments, and finishes that deteriorate quickly with weather, ultra-violet light, and that are more susceptible to wear and tear are prohibited on permanent structures. ●●B- 2.5.2.2.3. Use well-detailed, proportioned, and durable materials that will weather and age gracefully, adding to the architectural character over time. Avoid non-durable materials that deteriorate quickly and require frequent maintenance or replacement. S R5.1E Unfinished or colored ordinary smooth face block, untextured concrete panels, and prefabricated steel panels are prohibited as a finish material for building façades, except as an accent or secondary field material. ●● 11-3A- 19A.2b 11- 3A-19A.2c Smooth faced concrete block, prefabricated steel panels, and/or vinyl are prohibited as finish materials but may be approved as accent materials in accord with the "City Of Meridian Design Manual". Similar and a replacement to UDC items 11-3A-19A.2b and 11-3A-19A.2c From UDC (11-3A-19A.2b and 11-3A-19A.2c). Need in both Non-residential and residential. G R5.20 Incorporate material and color changes as integrated details of the building design; maintain architectural integrity and promote a quality appearance and character. Applies to building façades visible from a public street, public space, and pedestrian environments. ●●E-2.5.2.4. Incorporate material and color changes as integrated details of the building design; maintain architectural integrity and promote a quality appearance and character. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: Single=Single-Family Residential, Multi=Multi-Family | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)5 of 7 Architectural Standards | Residential @ ID #Current Revision Single Multi Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref S R5.2A Use a cohesive color scheme featuring a minimum of two field colors, a trim color, and an accent color or unique material. Garage door colors must coincide with this scheme or other accents. ●●E- 2.5.2.5.4. Residential structures should use a cohesive color scheme featuring a minimum of two field colors: a trim color and a front door color. Garage door colors should coincide with this scheme or the material palette of the structure. I don't feel like a front door has to be a special color. Changing to be "accent", and incorporated however the designer chooses. S R5.2B For each wall plane area greater than 20-feet in length or height, and visible from prescribed areas, incorporate at least two distinct field materials, patterns, or colors in any combination, for at least 25% of the visible area. Windows or portals with qualifying accent materials may count towards this requirement, when meeting overall material requirements for the façade elevation. ●●E- 2.5.2.4.1 When large wall areas are proposed, architectural embellishments should be used to reduce monotony. S R5.2C Vinyl siding must include a mix of material patterns, including but not limited to: board and batten, horizontal and vertical lap, shake, or shingles, and meeting other material requirements. ●●E- 2.5.2.4.2. Vinyl siding may be appropriate if it creates interest in the design by using a mix of material patterns (e.g. board and batten, horizontal and vertical lap, shake or shingles), colors and accented corner posts. S R5.2D Masonry as a qualifying accent material must be applied to 50 percent of the available wall length at a minimum height of 24 inches. (Available wall length does not include garage openings.) ●●E- 2.5.2.4.3. The use of masonry as a material accent should be applied to 50 percent of the available wall length at a minimum height of 24 inches. (Available wall length does not include garage openings.) G R5.30 Use colors that complement building materials and support innovative and good design practices. Applies to building façades visible from a public street, public spaces, and pedestrian environments. ●●B-2.5.2.4.Use colors that complement the use of building materials and support innovative and good design practices. S R5.3A Use of subtle, neutral, or natural tones must be integrated with at least one accent or field material.●●B- 2.5.2.4.1. The use of subtle, neutral, and natural tones for field materials should complement accent colors and materials. The use of deep earth tones or saturated colors to distinguish building façades should enhance the building design and be compatible with adjacent structures. S R5.3B Use of intensely bright and fluorescent colors, as well as the widespread use of saturated hues without complementary colors, materials, and accents, is not allowed. ●●E- 2.5.2.5.2. The use of intensely bright and fluorescent colors, as well as the widespread use of saturated hues without complementary colors, materials, and accents, is discouraged. Addressed in first occurrence for all categories B-2.5.2.4.2. S R5.3C Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as some metals or reflective glazing, must not redirect light towards roadways, public spaces, or adjacent uses in a way which constitutes a public nuisance or safety hazard. ●●B- 2.5.2.4.3. Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as metal or reflective glazing, should be reviewed and evaluated with the Planning staff to minimize glare on roadways, public spaces, and adjacent uses and to determine appropriateness. G R5.40 When practical, organize building service equipment, including, but not limited to, utility, service, and mechanical, away from building entries, roadways, public spaces, and adjacent buildings. ●●11-4-3- 27E.7 Created goal to support UDC requirement. Similar to original ID #156 for commercial screening of mechanical equipment. S R5.4A All roof and wall mounted mechanical, electrical, communications, and service equipment must be screened from public view from the adjacent public streets and properties by the use of parapets, walls, fences, enclosures, or by other suitable means. ●●11-4-3- 27E.7 From UDC specific to multi-family. Very similar to existing criteria for mechanical units on commercial structures. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: Single=Single-Family Residential, Multi=Multi-Family | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)6 of 7 Architectural Standards | Residential @ ID #Current Revision Single Multi Original DM Code UDC #Original Design Guideline or UDC Code Record Comments Sorting Comments (DM A, B, C, D, & E Sections)Similar Ref I R6.00 Integrate architectural lighting as cohesive elements of building designs that contribute to the atmosphere of the built environments and enhance safety. ○●B-2.6.2.1. To encourage the use of signs and architectural lighting as integrated elements of building designs that contribute to the atmosphere of urban environments and enhance the pedestrian experience. G R6.10 Use lighting on building exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environments along roadways, at intersections, and in public spaces. ○●B-2.6.3.1. Where appropriate, use lighting on building exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environments along roadways, at intersections, and in public spaces. S R6.1A Lighting fixture spacing and height along streetscapes and roadways must be placed to avoid conflicts with tree plantings. ○●B- 2.6.3.1.1. Coordinate lighting fixture spacing and height along streetscapes and roadways to avoid conflicts with tree plantings. S R6.1B Use energy-efficient architectural lighting.○●B- 2.6.3.1.2. The use of architectural lighting is encouraged to be energy-efficient and easily maintained, in addition to providing attractive qualities to building character and public spaces. S R6.1C Use lighting fixtures that are consistent with other decorative hardware on the building. For example, select lighting hardware with similar color and shape as other building hardware, use recessed lighting, incorporate uniform spacing, integrate with other accents and reveals, and coordinate specialty lights with predominate architectural features. ○●B- 2.6.3.1.3. Lighting fixtures used on building exteriors should be integrated with building design and coordinate with architectural elements and building entries. @: I=Intent, G=Goal, S=Standard | ● = applicable, ○ = not-applicable | Districts: Single=Single-Family Residential, Multi=Multi-Family | Sorting Comments: A, B, C, D, E Reference Original Design Manual Sections (Urban, Suburban, etc.)7 of 7 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: May 5, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 8C PROJECT NUMBER: Department Reports ITEM TITLE: Police Department: Budget Amendment Police Department: Budget Amendment for the Purchase of a Replacement Canine to Service the Needs of the City, for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $8,000.00 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS W � O N W L c @ 3 w c L cd) E O G � •L t-- LL N O p U n y a� N A N z U U N a N 0 U N 4 c c E `o +�• O m 4. G c � � E c p O u m O O LL � coo coo � O Z to a) a) E E 'a t t G fl_ O- U a) a) � p p v GA 0 � G O E LU ai m v Z a1 bA N � c o to � O L t a) c O vi vi v� vt L1 Y 0 U cc c 0 v CL C cOi Y O c m C 3 Q ' O H U N � v _O � CL aco O QQ \ m F\- > c U w E a. O p LL a w 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W O d' rl N m to O O �--1 O N N N N N N N m O o 0 0 '. q 11 rl N N N N m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 x W a c= v`o°w°'aZ`a°c ,p v. a a a +. a w v ar � y 3 �v3'.c�v�o,OaN' a vC°'a��,c'ova •� 1 t,31 C a � w \ 0000000000000 I I m m m m m m m m m m m m cn L N N N N N N N N N N N N N s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z\ ` z z JK N N 41 Vii) V j �. Q � Ql a I. It 00 0 n 0 aJ Do A a� 4) LL 94 0 00 V/- H S t1J GC C c� G c Q 0 O O L ~ E 0 LL C:: m E a C a) Q N m 0=0 to 0 } LL c m �o 0 T x t � y a 0 N M y s u a y a� N A N z U U N a N 0 U N 4 c c E `o +�• O m 4. G c � � E c p O u m O O LL � coo coo � O Z to a) a) E E 'a t t G fl_ O- U a) a) � p p v GA 0 � G O E LU ai m v Z a1 bA N � c o to � O L t a) c O vi vi v� vt L1 Y 0 U cc c 0 v CL C cOi Y O c m C 3 Q ' O H U N � v _O � CL aco O QQ \ m F\- > c U w E a. O p LL a w 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W O d' rl N m to O O �--1 O N N N N N N N m O o 0 0 '. q 11 rl N N N N m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 x W a c= v`o°w°'aZ`a°c ,p v. a a a +. a w v ar � y 3 �v3'.c�v�o,OaN' a vC°'a��,c'ova •� 1 t,31 C a � w \ 0000000000000 I I m m m m m m m m m m m m cn L N N N N N N N N N N N N N s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z\ ` z z JK N N 41 Vii) V j �. Q � Ql a I. It 00 0 n 0 aJ Do A a� 4) LL 94 0 00 V/- H S t1J GC C c� G c Q 0 O O L ~ E 0 LL C:: m E a C a) Q N m 0=0 to 0 } LL c m �o 0 T G fl_ O- U a) a) � p p v GA 0 � G O E LU ai m v Z a1 bA N � c o to � O L t a) c O vi vi v� vt L1 Y 0 U cc c 0 v CL C cOi Y O c m C 3 Q ' O H U N � v _O � CL aco O QQ \ m F\- > c U w E a. O p LL a w 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W O d' rl N m to O O �--1 O N N N N N N N m O o 0 0 '. q 11 rl N N N N m m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 x W a c= v`o°w°'aZ`a°c ,p v. a a a +. a w v ar � y 3 �v3'.c�v�o,OaN' a vC°'a��,c'ova •� 1 t,31 C a � w \ 0000000000000 I I m m m m m m m m m m m m cn L N N N N N N N N N N N N N s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z\ ` z z JK N N 41 Vii) V j �. Q � Ql a I. It 00 0 n 0 aJ Do A a� 4) LL 94 0 00 V/- H S t1J GC C c� G c Q 0 O O L ~ E 0 LL C:: m E a C a) Q N m 0=0 to 0 } LL c m �o 0 T x 0 x W a c= v`o°w°'aZ`a°c ,p v. a a a +. a w v ar � y 3 �v3'.c�v�o,OaN' a vC°'a��,c'ova •� 1 t,31 C a � w \ 0000000000000 I I m m m m m m m m m m m m cn L N N N N N N N N N N N N N s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z\ ` z z JK N N 41 Vii) V j �. Q � Ql a I. It 00 0 n 0 aJ Do A a� 4) LL 94 0 00 V/- H S t1J GC C c� G c Q 0 O O L ~ E 0 LL C:: m E a C a) Q N m 0=0 to 0 } LL c m �o 0 T z\ ` z z JK N N 41 Vii) V j �. Q � Ql a I. It 00 0 n 0 aJ Do A a� 4) LL 94 0 00 V/- H S t1J GC C c� G c Q 0 O O L ~ E 0 LL C:: m E a C a) Q N m 0=0 to 0 } LL c m �o 0 T I. It 00 0 n 0 aJ Do A a� 4) LL 94 0 00 V/- H S t1J GC C c� G c Q 0 O O L ~ E 0 LL C:: m E a C a) Q N m 0=0 to 0 } LL c m �o 0 T E O LL C a) W N T- C) O N LL co ^0 CW G O AlLJ m a c Q x a) N ami a 0 O c w M1. C m CL ao mm 10 Cl cr1 A i �` 0 > O Q Q m N a ¢ >0 v Q cn o .D m _� m C� U E m da)a c � IL O 30 L1 Y m ° >. 4 m C N � Y c m u o m m .l C ca — Y U O (UL, O c m U a) C 1 aE v o L N O 'O O E N m O > U - s °4-- U '3 Y Q U 3 i a, m L a) E O Y N v ac) '3 aa) ¢ N -0Y 5.N 7 c a E o Nc ¢ ¢ a Q 3 21110 I m N 3N U E Co .3 0 m c N N C m O(U ME '0 aj a) a) NU t Y m C O @ N m : C c 4 c 'O a) oN d .o L fa a) a)O _ +� N c N E n m cu (v " C ;: @ O U 41 s a) cu L 4L- ISA c C ai 3 T 3 > -0 lJ m ,; a) fEa Z a a) a) > 'o w> aa)) > > m t v 4 m t m -a o- a c a aci c t Wh +� s 0 v i me a) o aa) 401a) E a + O m @ o > N a N o _ u N ai F a) o fu N j O c O °O'D a m -0Z 73 -O o c i-' c m a) = O 4=- `L° a) Z ..0 L U o O 3 N v Z 'a u@fs-o c o o Oc E rli > fll ap m -o N a1 m :. W Y N YL- Y z E s O +` m m f 0) L 41 U c f Y - c a) C v Y _ a) L m > O �. N >O � m m w :P N U 3 s'3 a cn c _ hA :c m "a)O Y t1p N U ) LL I 'c _ ai C C> p c -I E �c a) O N O c o aN ` O Y 3> a) v 'O C? C. 3 a) U .N O CL L a)fv fU 0 � m LfU U m U a) N c a m E: a m m c m aN) in E o E Q1 m a�Nio m c c+ fa i Z fL C 'D {=n N fco c aai L a) Q 7'v @�-Y au)+� c v 4== cYo E um COX E E c.. m a) 3 a a) a) '�' @ �. a i, i.) S v bA t c �+ = C al E- fca E 4- a v N c t3 aci:Oaj t t m m E a) 4> - — o v m o v o v Z m Q. > O m , cr U si fT "O a) mN Y C +� a) O +� U v a) F- Co to a ai -:5 fy00' 4S v 0 -2-M a) CI- m :3OO_ CA .n `Ln �. 1 j.. d' t O o -W O m U U c c c O) m me 4; NN fca m o a) .Y m co 3 3 �' ao *' a) N 0 ,>� L C m C:c `u N0= U E .0 O c LL LL c m N s m c c O q) v E Y N v m tLa m 0 v N W � o F-. is m a c Q x a) N ami a 0 O c w M1. C m CL ao mm 10 Cl cr1 A i �` 0 > O Q Q m N a ¢ >0 v Q cn o .D m _� m C� U E m da)a c � IL O 30 L1 Y m ° >. 4 m C N � Y c m u o m m .l C ca — Y U O (UL, O c m U a) C 1 aE v o L N O 'O O E N m O > U - s °4-- U '3 Y Q U 3 i a, m L a) E O Y N v ac) '3 aa) ¢ N -0Y 5.N 7 c a E o Nc ¢ ¢ a Q 3 21110 I m N 3N U E Co .3 0 m c N N C m O(U ME Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM TITLE: Strategic Plan Update ITEM NUMBER: 8A PROJECT NUMBER: Department Reports MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 8B PROJECT NUMBER: Department Reports ITEM TITLE: Quarterly Dashboard Discussion MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 9A PROJECT NUMBER: AZ -15-012 ITEM TITLE: Graycliff Estates Ordinance No. 1s- I lo(a(p : An Ordinance (AZ 15-012 Graycliff Estates) of the City of Meridian Granting Annexation and Zoning for a Parcel of Land Containing 52.46 Acres more or less, located in the SE '/4 of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise, Ada County, Idaho from RUT to R-8 (Medium Density Residential District) and R-40 (High Density Residential District) in the Meridian City Code MEETING NOTES [Y] Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: December 15, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 9B PROJECT NUMBER: RZ 13-016 ITEM TITLE: DaVinci Park E,Loho. /c-� (e7 An Ordinance (RZ 13-016 DaVinci Park) for the Rezone of a Parcel of Land Being Portions of the NE'/4 of the NE'/4 of Lot 7, Crestwood Subdivision No. 1, Located in Section3l , Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County Idaho; Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification of C -N (Neighborhood Business) and R-8 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning Districts in the Meridian City Code. MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS