Loading...
Parks Master Plan December 2015Parks and recreation Master Plan deceMber 2015   Parks and Recreation Master Plan i Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN ............................................................................................................................. 1 PLANNING PROCESS SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1 KEY ISSUES SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 2 KEY LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS FINDINGS: .......................................................................................... 4 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 II. INTRODUCTION OF THE PLANNING CONTEXT .................................................................... 11 A. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN ....................................................................................................................... 11 B. HISTORY OF PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT .................................................................................. 11 C. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW .................................................................................... 11 D. MISSION, VISION, AND VALUES ............................................................................................................. 12 E. RELATED PLANNING EFFORTS AND INTEGRATION ....................................................................................... 13 F. METHODOLOGY OF THIS PLANNING PROCESS ............................................................................................ 13 III. WHAT WE WANT – OUR COMMUNITY AND IDENTIFIED NEEDS ........................................ 15 A. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ...................................................................................................................... 15 B. PARK AND RECREATION INFLUENCING TRENDS .......................................................................................... 20 C. COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT .................................................................................................. 22 D. RANDOM INVITATION COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY ............................................................................. 23 E. ORGANIZATIONAL AND MARKETING ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 33 G. RECREATION PROGRAMMING ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 35 H. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 36 I. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 39 IV. WHAT WE HAVE NOW – INVENTORY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ........................... 43 A. INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................................. 43 B. GRASP® METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 44 C. GRASP® ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................. 54 D. OTHER TYPES OF ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................. 65 E. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................... 68 F. PARK CLASSIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 69 G. URBAN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................. 81 H. STRATEGIC GOALS FOR MERIDIAN URBAN FORESTRY ................................................................................. 84 I. EXISTING URBAN FOREST DATA .............................................................................................................. 86 J. PATHWAYS ASSESSMENT & RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................... 92 K. SUMMARY OF PLANNING PROCESS FOR CONCEPTUAL PARK MASTER PLANS ................................................... 99 V. KEY ISSUES ...................................................................................................................... 103 TRIANGULATION MATRIX ....................................................................................................................... 103      ii City of Meridian, Idaho VI. GREAT THINGS TO COME ‐ RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION PLANS ........................... 107 A. RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 107 B. ACTION PLAN, COST ESTIMATES, AND PRIORITIZATION ............................................................................. 113   List of Tables  Table 1: Summary Demographics for Meridian, Idaho – 2015 ................................................................... 15 Table 2: Meridian Population Projections* ................................................................................................ 15 Table 3: Meridian, Idaho– 2014 Educational Attainment ........................................................................... 18 Table 4: Meridian Housing Statistics ........................................................................................................... 19 Table 5: Outdoor Inventory Summary Table .............................................................................................. 49 Table 6: Indoor Inventory Summary Table ................................................................................................. 51 Table 7: GRASP® Comparative Data ............................................................................................................ 63 Table 8: Capacities LOS for Community Components ................................................................................ 65 Table 9: GRASP® Community Component Index ........................................................................................ 67 Table 10: Key Issues Analysis Matrix ......................................................................................................... 104   List of Figures  Figure 1: Population Age Distribution for the Years 2010, 2014, and 2019 ............................................... 16 Figure 2: Ethnicity Statistics (2014) ............................................................................................................. 17 Figure 3: Snapshot of Meridian and Idaho unemployment rates from 2006 ‐ 2014 .................................. 18 Figure 4: Annual Household Income Distribution Comparison (2014 ‐ 2019) ............................................ 19 Figure 5: Current Facilities – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix ................................................................ 27 Figure 6: Current Programs – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix ............................................................... 29 Figure 7: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined .................................................. 30 Figure 8: Allocation of Funding Toward Facilities/Services/Programs – Average Allocation Amount ....... 33 Figure 9: Park Acreage ................................................................................................................................ 37 Figure 10: Pathways Maintained ................................................................................................................ 38 Figure 11: Developed Park Acres per 1,000 People  ................................................................................... 38 Figure 12: GRASP® Catchment and Scoring Example ................................................................................. 52 Figure 13: GRASP® Scoring Calculation ....................................................................................................... 53 Figure 14: Sample Data Chart Generated in GIS Using Data from Current Tree Inventory ........................ 87 Figure 15: Working Plan of Kleiner Arboretum ........................................................................................... 90                            Parks and Recreation Master Plan iii   Acknowledgements   Mayor & City Council  Tammy de Weerd ‐ Mayor  Charlie Rountree ‐ City Council President  Keith Bird ‐ Vice President  Joe Borton  Luke Cavener  Genesis Milam  David Zaremba    Parks & Recreation Commission  Matt Stoll ‐ President  Creg Steele ‐ Vice President  Treg Bernt  Sharon Borton  William Fitzgerald  Kent Goldthorpe  Jo Greer  Phillip Liddell  John Nesmith    Project Team  Steve Siddoway ‐ Parks & Recreation Director  Mike Barton ‐ Parks Superintendent  Jay Gibbons ‐ Parks & Pathways Project Manager  Roger Norberg ‐ Parks Maintenance Foreman  Elroy Huff ‐ City Arborist  Colin Moss, Garrett White, & Jake Garro ‐ Recreation Coordinators  Rachel Myers ‐ Administrative Assistant II  Shelly Houston ‐ Marketing Coordinator  Doug Green & Matt Tenold ‐ GIS Specialists  Brian McClure ‐ Associate City Planner    Parks & Recreation Staff  Community Stakeholders, Entities, Organizations, Agencies, Commissions, Churches, & Schools; &  Department Directors, & Staff that Participated in the Focus Groups    Consultant Team  GreenPlay, LLC  Design Concepts  Breckon Land Design  RRC Associates    For more information about this document, contact GreenPlay, LLC  At: 1021 E. South Boulder Road, Suite N, Louisville, Colorado 80027, Telephone: 303‐439‐8369    Email: info@greenplayllc.com  www.greenplayllc.com                                      THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 1 I. Executive Summary   A. Purpose of this Plan  The City of Meridian, Idaho, provides a  comprehensive Parks and Recreation  system that greatly contributes to the  quality of life in Meridian and surrounding  areas. In order to plan into the future of  this valuable Parks and Recreation system,  the City’s Parks and Recreation  Department began a process to develop  this Parks and Recreation Master Plan.  Development of this plan took place from  December 2014 to December 2015, and  included a public input process, services  inventory and analysis, needs assessment, operational and maintenance analysis, and financial analysis.  The Master Plan provides the framework to respond to the evolving needs of this growing community.    B. Planning Process Summary  This project has been guided by a Meridian Parks and Recreation project team made up of City staff,  with input from the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council. This team provided input  to the GreenPlay consulting team throughout the planning process. This collaborative effort created a  plan that fully utilizes the consultant’s expertise and incorporates the local knowledge and  institutional history that only community members can provide. The project consisted of the following  tasks:    Community Engagement   Review of previous planning efforts, City historical information.    Extensive community involvement effort including focus groups, meetings with key  stakeholders, and a community‐wide public meeting.   Statistically‐valid community interest and opinion survey.    Online community engagement website – MindMixer/mySidewalk.    Facility Inventory   Inventory of parks and facilities using existing mapping, staff interviews, and on‐site visits to  verify amenities and assess the condition of the facilities and surrounding areas.    GRASP® Level of Service Analysis   Interviews with staff to provide information about City facilities and services, along with insight  regarding the current practices and experiences of the City in serving its residents and visitors.   Identification of alternative providers of recreation services to provide insight regarding the  market opportunities in the area for potential new facilities and services.   Analysis addressing recreation, parks, and related services.        2 City of Meridian, Idaho Assessment and Analysis   Review and assessment of relevant plans.   Measurement of the current delivery of service for City facilities using the GRASP® Level of  Service Analysis and allowing for a target level of service to be determined that is both feasible  and aligned with the desires of citizens as expressed through the citizen survey. This analysis is  also represented graphically in GRASP® Perspectives.   Exploration of finance and funding mechanisms to support development and sustainability  within the system.    Needs Assessment   Consideration of the profile of the community and demographics, including population growth.   Research of trends related to Meridian and American lifestyles to help guide the efforts of Parks  and Recreation over the next several years.  Operational and Marketing Analysis   Analyze parks and recreation programming and service delivery.   Conduct an organizational Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis.   Develop a broad assessment of the overall parks and recreation operations.  Recommendations: Goals, Objectives, and Action Plan   Identification and categorization of recommendations into themes with goals, objectives, and an  action plan for implementation.   Development of an action plan for capital improvements including cost, funding source  potentials, and timeframe to support the implementation of the plan.     Other Plan Elements:   Review of current staffing and development of recommendation for future growth potential.   Review of the current Park Classification System and development of recommendations for a  component based system of classification.    Develop an Urban Forestry Management strategy.   Review current Pathways Plan and develop updated recommendations.   Conduct public engagement meeting to develop draft concept plans for:   South Meridian Regional Park (77 acres)   Borup/Bottles Properties (47 acres)   Margaret Aldape Park (60 acres +/‐)    C. Key Issues Summary  During the initial stages of the project, the following Key Issues were identified for focus:    Organizational:   Improve marketing and communication of activities and facilities.   Increased staffing for programming and future facilities operations.   Increased maintenance staffing to keep up with quality of service and demand.   Increase opportunities to utilize technology to improve customer service and efficiencies.   Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways.   Increase partnerships.     Parks and Recreation Master Plan 3 Programs and Service Delivery:   Increase year‐round recreational activities.   Expand special event offerings.   Expand outdoor and adventure recreation opportunities.   Need programs at convenient times for community.   Expand programming for seniors, active adults, special needs, tweens, and teens.    Facilities and Amenities:   Maintain existing quantity and quality of level of service.   Maintain and improve existing facilities.   Find opportunities to acquire new land for parks.   Expand pathways and connectivity.   Adopt and continue to maintain a component based inventory and level of service standard in  existing GIS.   Add indoor recreation space.   Improve signage agency‐wide.   Maintain existing facilities and amenities.   Develop new amenities at new and existing parks based on level of service analysis.   Add additional athletic fields and lights.   Evaluate parking and event/program/activity scheduling.   Develop an ADA Transition Plan.   Upgrade convenience and customer service items to existing facilitates.   Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when  developing new ones.   Gather and maintain data on HOA and alternative provider owned recreational property.   Develop and maintain life cycle replacement and asset management plans.   Create park identity in existing and new parks.    Finance:   Increase event and activity sponsorships.   Review Developer Impact fee ordinance.   Consider dedicated funding source for parks and recreation.   Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities.   Consider Cost Recovery and Pricing Philosophy including scholarships.        4 City of Meridian, Idaho D. Key Level of Service (LOS) Analysis Findings  Several general findings were revealed by the City of Meridian GRASP® Analysis. These may be  summarized as follows:    For neighborhood access to parks and recreation, Meridian offers:   A wide variety of well distributed recreational opportunities.   High quality and well maintained parks.   Good access with over 75 percent of land area above threshold when considering all providers.   Definite distinction between “Community Parks” and “Neighborhood Parks.”   An overall high level of service if accessed by an automobile.   High scoring “Regional Parks” or “Community Parks.”   A high number of components and average score per site when compared to some other  communities.   Some large “pockets” of high level of service.   Great restroom standards.    For walkable level of service:   While “Neighborhood Parks” often score high enough to meet the “threshold,” a lack of  pathway access often keeps an area below the threshold mark.   Some parks, especially “Neighborhood Parks,” lack unique or identifiable character.   Alternative providers are an important supplement to Meridian’s “Neighborhood” level of  service.   There is heavy reliance on alternative providers (including schools) for walkable neighborhood  level of service in many areas, and the quality of alternative providers’ parks varies greatly  across the system.   Demographic analysis shows good distribution of parks where young people live with over 75  percent of the 0‐19 age group having walkable access to some recreation service.   There is a need to identify and collect inventory data on the remaining alternative provider  parks/facilities.   Access to a quality, connected pathway system is limited and greatly impacts overall walkable  level of service in Meridian.    For pathways and pathway access:   There a variety of pathways are available across the City, but they are not meeting the needs  and demands of the community.    Many of the pathways within Meridian are not connected to the larger overall pathway system.   A significant portion of these pathways may have limited or restricted access based on locations  within subdivisions.   Pathway access is notably absent from some Meridian residential neighborhoods.    Based on projected population growth over the next 5‐7 years, Meridian and its partners need:   Additional park land and components added to the system to maintain current level of service.   To improve or upgrade existing components to maintain current level of service.        Parks and Recreation Master Plan 5 E. Recommendations  After analyzing the Findings that resulted from this process, including the Key Issues Matrix, a summary  of all research, the qualitative and quantitative data, the GRASP® LOS analyses, and input assembled for  this study, a variety of recommendations have emerged to provide guidance in consideration of how to  improve parks, recreation, and pathway opportunities in the City of Meridian. This section describes  ways to enhance the level of service and the quality of life with improvement through organizational  efficiencies, financial opportunities, improved programming and service delivery, and maintenance and  improvements to facilities and amenities.    Goal 1: Continue to Improve Organizational Efficiencies    Objective 1.1 – Maintain existing level of service goal  The City of Meridian currently has a Level of Service that is three acres of developed park land per 1,000  persons with a goal of increasing to a Level of Service Standard of four acres/1,000 persons by 2040.  Additionally, the City should develop a Level of Service Standard that considers components within parks  and a radius of .5 miles per component for walkability.    Objective 1.2 – Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department  activities and services.  The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to implement the Marketing Plan  (Communication Plan) that will guide the Department’s efforts in communicating and promoting its  activities, services, and facilities. This will continue to create great awareness and should include all of  the recommendations in the Master Plan for programs, services, and facility upgrades. Additionally, the  Marketing Plan should be reviewed annually and updated as needed, and should include marketing  strategies that incorporate the efforts of partner departments and projects.     The marketing and communication of Parks and Recreation Department activities should be enhanced  with a focused effort on adopting open lines of communication and meetings with partners and  potential partners within the community. This enhanced focus will help to create advocacy in the  community and provide a forum to better celebrate the successes of the Department.    Objective 1.3 – Provide improved signage agency‐wide to make it easier for patrons to find and use  parks, facilities, and pathways.  The Parks and Recreation Department should evaluate directional and wayfinding signage to facilities on  roadway, pathways, and within parks. Additionally, the Department should develop signage standards  for parks and update existing park signs as parks are renovated to meet the new standard. Improved  wayfinding signage will contribute to a greater connectivity of parks, facilities, and pathways.    Objective 1.4 – Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities.  There was an overwhelming public response to make sure that Parks and Recreation maintains and  improves existing facilities. The Department should continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities  and amenities as well as address low scoring components through the CIP Plan and the Life Cycle  Maintenance Program.             6 City of Meridian, Idaho Objective 1.5 – Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways.  Mobile marketing is a trend of the future. Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much  higher rates than adults in age brackets 30 and older. Usage rates of mobile applications demonstrate  that chronologically across four major age cohorts, Millennials tend to get information more frequently  using mobile devices, such as smart phones. Parks and Recreation should explore additional social media  uses and navigation apps for parks and pathways. The City of Meridian has current best practices for  social media that should be followed, reviewed annually, and updated as needed.    Objective 1.6 – Increase appropriate partnerships within the community.  The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department currently partners with a number of agencies to  provide programs and activities to the community. The Department should continue to explore  additional opportunities, as well as build on their existing partnerships. Where not already in place, the  Department should ensure that all existing and future partnerships are accurately portrayed in a signed  partnership agreement (Sample Partnership Policy can be found in Appendix G).    The City of Meridian Strategic Plan that was adopted in 2015 sets a goal of continuing to explore  partnerships with alternative providers to increase level of service. Additionally, the Department should  identify desired sports facilities or complexes and establish partnerships that foster their development.    Objective 1.7 – Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies.  The Department should continue to explore additional opportunities to expand the use of technology  Department wide. Some immediate areas in which area to increase technology within the Department  include providing online shelter reservations and providing a mobile application of the Department’s  website.    Objective 1.8 – Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service.  As recommendations in the Master Plan for programs, services, new facilities, pathways, parks, and  facility upgrades are implemented, it is important to maintain staffing levels to maintain current  performance standards. This will require the new positions both in parks and recreation.     Objective 1.9 – Maintain and keep current the Department Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and  Policies.  The Parks and Recreation Department is governed by City Code and internal standards of operations and  policies. The Department should review the City Code Chapter for Parks and Recreation annually and  recommend updates as needed. Additionally, staff should review Department SOPs and policies annually  and update as needed.    Objective 1.10 – Expand the volunteer program  The Department currently has a Park Ambassador Program that could be reviewed, improved, and  expanded to meet their growing needs. Additionally, they should continue to make use of other  volunteer opportunities for park projects and events.                Parks and Recreation Master Plan 7 Goal 2: Increase Financial Opportunities    Objective 2.1 – Increase special event and activities sponsorships.  The Department should continue to explore additional sponsorship opportunities and build on existing  sponsorships. All existing and future sponsorships should be evaluated to ensure that they are  accurately portrayed in a signed sponsorship agreement (Sample Sponsorship Policy can be found in  Appendix E).    Objective 2.2 – Evaluate Developer Impact Fee Ordinance.  The current Developer Impact Fee is based on a LOS of 3.04 acres of developed park land per 1,000  people. As the Department moves toward its goal of four acres of developed park land per 1,000 people,  the ordinance should be reviewed every three years to keep current with the LOS. Additionally, the  Department should review its Developer Impact Fee revenue annually to align with CIP requests and  existing LOS.    Objective 2.3 – Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities.  The Department currently takes advantage of grant opportunities available for programming, services,  and facility improvements. The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to pursue any and all  grant opportunities at the federal, state, regional, and local levels. To accomplish this, the Department  may consider contracting with a dedicated grant writer to research, submit, and track such grants.    Objective 2.4 –Implement a cost recovery and pricing policy.  The Department currently has a practice of cost recovery, but  it varies based on the different service areas. The Parks and  Recreation Department should implement a Cost Recovery  Policy, such as the Pyramid Pricing Methodology (Appendix F)  to determine a consistent method of pricing Parks and  Recreation activities throughout the Department. As part of  the policy, the Department should continue to support the  current Care Enough to Share Scholarship Program.     In addition to establishing a Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy,  the Department should explore the feasibility of a dedicated  revenue for parks and recreation through special revenue  funds, sports, tourism, or other available sources.    Goal 3: Continue to Improve Programs and Service Delivery    Objective 3.1 – Increase year round recreational programming and activities.  The Department should continue to look for opportunities to expand indoor recreational programs and  activities. The community would like to see additional programs for tweens, teens, people with special  needs, and seniors. As new programs are developed, continue to monitor recreational trends to stay  current with programming and demand. As popularity in program offerings and activities increases,  continue to look for opportunities to expand programs around working hours and commuting citizens  schedules.       8 City of Meridian, Idaho The City’s Strategic Plan has also set a goal to attract, promote, and maintain a “signature” event for the  City, and to set targets, identify gaps, and deploy programs, activities, and events that provide family‐ centered recreational opportunities.    Goal 4: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities    Objective 4.1 – Maintain and improve existing facilities.  The Department should continue to implement existing plans, the CIP, Life Cycle Replacement Programs,  and the Master Plan. These plans should be reviewed annually and updated as needed.    Objective 4.2 – Expand pathways and connectivity.  The Department should continue to implement the existing Pathways Master Plan and update as  needed based on annual reviews. As new and existing pathways are designed and renovated, the  Department should consider adding fitness stations and family fun stations in appropriate locations  along the pathways.     Objective 4.3 – Add indoor recreation space.  Based on feedback from focus group participants and the survey results, there is a need for additional  indoor recreation space. The Department should continue to explore opportunities to add additional  indoor recreation space either through partnerships, purchase of an existing facility, or construction of a  Community Center or Fieldhouse. Another option would be to explore opportunities to add Community  Centers to newly planned elementary schools.     Objective 4.4 – Develop new amenities at existing parks based on level of service analysis.  Demand for usage of Meridian parks and athletic facilities continue to grow, and the Department should  look for opportunities to add new amenities to enhance the experience for users. As Meridian continues  to grow, the Department should look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in those new growth  areas. Also, based on the GRASP® analysis, the Department should look for opportunities to add new  components at existing parks where the level of service is below threshold.    Objective 4.5 – Acquire new land for parks.  Based on population growth and a LOS goal of reaching four acres of developed park land per 1,000  population, the Department needs to continue to find and purchase additional land for future park  development. When considering new parks, priority should be given to areas where LOS is below  threshold.    Objective 4.6 – Improve parking at parks.  Parking was an issue that was identified at most of the focus groups. The Department should continue  to monitor parking during peak usage times and explore the need to improve and potentially add more  parking at appropriate parks and amenities. Another consideration would be to explore alternative  transportation options to reduce parking demand.                  Parks and Recreation Master Plan 9 Objective 4.7 – Continue to improve ADA accessibility at all facilities.  According to the ADA.gov website, “Access to civic life by people with disabilities is a fundamental goal  of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). To ensure that this goal is met, Title II of the ADA requires  State and local governments to make their programs and services accessible to persons with disabilities…  One important way to ensure that Title II's requirements are being met in cities of all sizes is through self‐ evaluation, which is required by the ADA regulations. Self‐evaluation enables local governments to  pinpoint the facilities, programs, and services that must be modified or relocated to ensure that local  governments are complying with the ADA.”     Parks and Recreation currently does not have an ADA Accessibility Transition Plan which identifies  needed changes during a self‐evaluation process. The Department needs to conduct a self‐evaluation  and develop a comprehensive transition plan. Once the ADA Transition Plan is developed and adopted,  it should be updated at least every five years.    Objective 4.8 – Upgrade comfort, convenience, and cultural amenities to existing facilities.  As the Department is making upgrades to and improving existing facilities, it should explore  opportunities to add shade, storage, security lighting, synthetic turf, and other amenities appropriately  at existing facilities. Working with the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Department should seek  opportunities to create individual identities for each Neighborhood Park. Where appropriate, look for  opportunities to add public art to new and existing facilities.    Objective 4.9 – Add destination park amenities.  As citizen interest grows, and demand for new and different amenities at parks are identified, the  Department should explore opportunities to add destination playgrounds and natural play areas at  existing parks. The newly adopted Strategic Plan also has a goal to foster development of Discovery  Parks that uniquely blend arts, entertainment, and culture.    Objective 4.10 – Address current and future needs for athletic fields.  As demand warrants, explore opportunities to add rectangle and diamond fields as usage increases. To  help increase field time, add sports field lighting to new facilities and improvements to lighting at  existing facilities where appropriate. Additionally, the Department should consider upgrading to or  adding synthetic turf fields as use and demand increases.    Objective 4.11 – Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or  when developing new parks.  Continue to evaluate the programming needs of the community when developing new parks or when  adding new components to existing parks.    Objective 4.12 – Monitor use, demands, and trends of recreation components.  Through the use of dashboards and other reporting and tracking tools, continue to monitor and evaluate  the use, demands, and trends in recreation amenities.                                         THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 11 II. Introduction of the Planning Context   A. Purpose of this Plan  The City of Meridian, Idaho, provides a  comprehensive Parks and Recreation system that  greatly contributes to the quality of life in Meridian  and surrounding areas. In order to plan into the  future of this valuable Parks and Recreation system,  the City’s Parks and Recreation Department began a  process to develop this Parks and Recreation  Master Plan. Development of this plan took place  from December 2014 to December 2015, and  included a public input process, services inventory  and analysis, needs assessment, operational and  maintenance analysis, and financial analysis. The Master Plan provides the framework to respond to the  evolving needs of this growing community.     B. History of Parks and Recreation Department  Since the 1980s, there have been only two developed City of Meridian parks in existence—Storey Park  (Previously known as “City Park” until 1980) and 8th Street Park. The Parks Division operated under the  Department of Public Works until 1998 when the City created a separate Parks and Recreation  Department. In January of 1998, Meridian hired its first Parks and Recreation Director, Tom Kuntz, who  served in that position until 2002. Also in 1998, the Parks and Recreation Commission was formed, and  the Department produced its first Activity Guide. Since 1998 there have been three Directors, Tom Kuntz  (1998 to 2002), Douglas Strong (2003 to 2007), and Steve Siddoway (2008 to present). The Department  continues to grow and provide facilities, programs, and services to the citizens of Meridian.     C. Parks and Recreation Department Overview  Parks and Recreation is responsible for maintaining public open spaces and for providing a quality  system of parks and recreation facilities and positive leisure opportunities available to all persons in the  community. The Department is also responsible for the development and maintenance of the pathways  system and the urban forest. The Meridian Parks and Recreation system consists of 387 acres of  parkland, 255 acres of developed parks and 132 acres of undeveloped land. The system is made up of 19  parks (not including Lakeview Golf Course): three undeveloped sites, just less than 22 miles of pathways,  and 13 miles of micro pathways, a senior center, and a community center. Additionally, Parks and  Recreation offers a variety of recreational programs, adult sports leagues, and special events, and  handles shelter/field reservations and temporary use permits.                  12 City of Meridian, Idaho D. Mission, Vision, and Values  As part of the Master Planning process, GreenPlay held a series of Mission, Vision, and Values (MVV)  work sessions with the Parks and Recreation staff. The purpose was to review the current MVV, validate  its purpose with staff, and align with the newly adopted MVV for the City that was developed as part of  the 2015 Strategic Plan. The MVV is what directs the departments and their employees daily.     The vision addresses how the Department will do its part to make Meridian, “A premier community in  which to live, work, and raise a family,” as well as fulfilling the City’s Vision that “Community members  will enjoy a … myriad of diverse arts, cultural, and recreational offerings to have meaningful  experiences.”    Furthermore, the Department’s focus areas are what guide its employees specifically as well as the  overall CARE values of the City. Meridian Parks & Recreation staff know and strive to champion  Customer service, Accountability, Respect, and Excellence, but they also practice Quality, Community,  and Fun daily.    The results of the work sessions produced the current Mission, Vision, and Values.    Mission: The Meridian Parks and Recreation Department’s mission is to enhance our community’s  quality of life by providing innovatively‐designed parks, connected pathways, and diverse recreational  opportunities for all citizens of Meridian that create lasting memories.     Vision: Meridian Parks and Recreation is a premier department that provides family‐focused  opportunities for the Meridian community and responds to a growing and changing population.    Focus Areas: Quality, Community, Fun    Quality: We provide quality parks, pathways, and recreational opportunities that are beautifully  designed, exceptionally maintained, safe, and create memories for the citizens and visitors to  Meridian.      Community: We build the sense of community in Meridian by connecting people through parks,  pathways, programs, and events that bring enjoyment to individuals and families of all ages and  abilities.    Fun: We provide places and opportunities that create quality of life experiences, bring balance  to working individuals and families, and are fun and enjoyable. At the end of the day, this is what  it’s all about!        Parks and Recreation Master Plan 13 E. Related Planning Efforts and Integration  As part of the master planning process, GreenPlay evaluated and utilized information from recent past  and/or current planning work. The consultant team consolidated relevant information from these  planning documents, inventory maps, budgets, work plans, and funding plans utilized by the Parks and  Recreation Department to facilitate the comprehensive coordination of direction and recommendations.  Documents included:    City of Meridian Strategic Plan (2015)   2003 Parks & Recreation Action Plan    City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan (2011)    Pathways Master Plan    Impact Fees Study    Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan (ACHD)    ACHD Roadways to Bikeways Plan    City of Meridian Existing Conditions Report    Ten Mile Specific Area Plan    Future Land Use Map     F. Methodology of this Planning Process  This project has been guided by a Meridian Parks and Recreation project team made up of City staff,  with input from the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council. This team provided input to  the GreenPlay consulting team throughout the planning process. This collaborative effort created a plan  that fully utilizes the consultant’s expertise and incorporates the local knowledge and institutional  history that only community members can provide. The project consisted of the following tasks:                                   Community Engagement  Facility Inventory  GRASP® Level of Service Analysis  Needs Assessment  Operational and Marketing Analysis  Recommendations: Goals, Objectives, and Action Plan                                      THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 15 III. What We Want – Our Community and Identified Needs   A. Demographic Profile   Understanding community demographics is an important component of preparing a Parks and  Recreation Master Plan. This chapter provides a demographic overview of the City of Meridian, Idaho.  The population data used in this demographic profile comes from ESRI Business Information Solutions,  based on the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census data and COMPASS to best represent the current profile.    Table 1: Summary Demographics for Meridian, Idaho – 2015  Summary Demographics  Population 91,311  Number of Households 31,555  Avg. Household Size 2.96  Median Age 33.58  Median Household Income $59,969   Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions    Demographic Analysis    Population Projections  Although the future of population growth cannot be predicted with certainty, it is helpful to make  assumptions about it for planning purposes. Table 2 contains population estimates and projections for  City of Meridian in the years 2015, 2020, and 2025, based on the 2010 U.S. Census. The annual growth  rate for the city from 2000 through 2010 was 6.16 percent. COMPASS’ projected annual growth rate for  the City for 2015 through 2025 is 1.9 percent, compared to a projected 2015‐2025 annual growth rate of  1.0 percent for the State of Idaho of and 0.73 percent for the United States as a whole.     Table 2: Meridian Population Projections*   US Census (2000 and 2010 ) and  COMPASS Projections   2000 Population 41,315  2010 Population 82,250  2015 Estimated 91,311  2020 Projected 108,701  2025 Projected 118,600  Source: COMPASS                  16 City of Meridian, Idaho Figure 1: Meridian Population Growth Trend                                  Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions. GreenPlay, LLC, calculated projected populations for 2024 based on  ESRI growth multiplier of 1.75% for Meridian.    Population Age Distribution  A comparison of the estimated population break down by age for Meridian from 2010 to 2019 is shown  in Figure 1. The gender distribution in 2014 was 49 percent male to 51 percent female. The median age  in 2014 was 33.5.     The U.S. census indicates that in 2010, the median age for the Caucasian population of Meridian was  33.1. By contrast, the median age for those who self‐identified as being of Hispanic Origin (irrespective  of race) was 21.7. Hispanic Origin was the most significant minority ethnic/racial identifier in the  Meridian population (at 6.8 percent) in 2010.    Figure 2: Population Age Distribution for the Years 2010, 2014, and 2019                                Source: 2010 U.S. Census; 2014 estimates and 2019 forecast provided by ESRI Business Information Solutions.  0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 2000 2010 2014 2019 2024 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 0 - 4 5 - 9 10 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75 - 84 85+ 2010 2014 2019   Parks and Recreation Master Plan 17 The age demographics have undergone a number of changes in  Meridian from 2010 to 2014 with these trends generally  predicted to continue through 2019. The 25‐44 age range is  predicted to drop by three percent to 27.5 percent from 2010 to  2019, while the 55‐74 age range is predicted to grow by 2.9  percent to represent 16.5 percent of the population in 2019.    Race/Ethnicity  Figure 2 reflects the racial/ethnic population distribution for  Meridian. Ninety‐one percent (91%) percent of the population  was Caucasian in 2014, with the Asian population at two  percent, African American at .8 percent, and Native American at  .5 percent of the population. Those identifying as two or more  races represented 3.1 percent of the population. Additionally,  the population of Hispanic origin (a separate look at the  population, irrespective of race) was at 7.5 percent in 2014.   The Caucasian population is trending slightly downward  from 92 percent in 2010 to a predicted 90 percent in  2019.    Meridian’s Asian population is trending upward slightly from 1.8 percent in 2010 to a predicted  2.4 percent in 2019.   The population of Hispanic origin (irrespective of race), at 6.8 percent in 2010, is expected to  grow to 8.8 percent of the population by 2019.    Figure 3: Ethnicity Statistics (2014)                                Source: 2010 U.S. Census; 2014 estimates and 2019 forecast provided by ESRI Business Information Solutions.                                                                  Hispanic origin can be viewed as the heritage, nationality, lineage, or country of birth of the person or the person’s parents or  ancestors before arriving in the United States. In the U.S. census, people who identify as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be  any race and are included in all of the race categories. Figure 3 represents Hispanic Origin as recorded in the U.S. Census.   0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Caucasian Alone African American Alone Native American Alone Asian Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 2010 2014 2019   18 City of Meridian, Idaho Educational Attainment  As shown in Table 3, the highest ranking educational cohorts in Meridian are those residents with  some college, no degree (29%) and those with a bachelor’s degree (23.8%). High school graduates  follow, comprising 18.8 percent of the population. According to a census study, education levels had  more effect on earnings over a 40‐year span in the workforce than any other demographic factor, such  as gender, race, and ethnic origin.1    Table 3: Meridian, Idaho– 2014 Educational Attainment  Education Attainment Service Area Percentage  Less than 9th grade 1.4%  9th to 12th grade, no diploma 4.9%  High school graduate (includes equivalency) 18.8%  GED/Alternative Credential 3.4%  Some college, no degree 29.0%  Associate’s degree 9.4%  Bachelor’s degree 23.8%  Graduate or professional degree 9.5%  Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions 2014 estimate based on the 2010 U.S. Census.    Employment  Figure 3 provides a snapshot of the unemployment rate from December 2006 through December  2014 for the City of Meridian and the State of Idaho as a whole. The unemployment rate for both  Meridian and Idaho in December 2014 was under four percent (3.4 percent for Meridian and 3.7  percent for the State of Idaho).    Figure 4: Snapshot of Meridian and Idaho unemployment rates from 2006 ‐ 2014                                  Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics                                                                1 Tiffany Julian and Robert Kominski, “Education and Synthetic Work‐Life Earnings Estimates” American Community Survey  Reports, US Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acs‐14.pdf, September 2011.    1.4% 5.8% 7.7% 5.3% 3.4% 2.7% 6.2% 8.8% 6.9% 3.7% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% Dec. 2006 Dec. 2008 Dec. 2010 Dec.2012 Dec.2014 Meridian Idaho   Parks and Recreation Master Plan 19 Household Information  As reflected in Table 4, in 2014, Meridian had 26,674 housing units with a 72.9 percent owner‐occupied  housing rate, compared to 22 percent renter occupied rate. The owner‐occupied housing rate dropped  more than seven percent between 2000 and 2010, but has remained steady since 2010, and is predicted  to rise slightly to 73.9 percent in 2019. The average household size in 2014 was 2.96.     Table 4: Meridian Housing Statistics                   Source: 2010 U.S. Census; 2014 estimates and 2019 forecasts provided by ESRI Business Information Solutions.    Household Income  The estimated 2014 median household income for residents of Meridian was $59,969 and is expected to  grow to $69,355 by 2019. Figure 4 illustrates the full income distribution estimated for Meridian in 2014  and projected for 2019.    In 2014, most residents had an income in the $50,000 – $74,999 income range (22.4%),  followed by the $75,000 – $99,999 income range (17.5%), and the $100,000 – $149,000  income range (13.5%).   Income distribution in the $75,000 – $99,999 and $100,000 – $149,000 ranges is expected to  rise by 2.6 percent and 3.4 percent, respectively, from 2014 to 2019.    Figure 5: Annual Household Income Distribution Comparison (2014 ‐ 2019)                                    Source: ESRI Business Information Solutions, 2014.     2000 2010 2014 2019  Total housing units 14,431 26,674 28,943 31,304  Percent owner occupied 80.8% 72.9% 72.9% 73.9%  Percent renter occupied 15.4% 22.0% 23.4% 23.3%  Percent vacant 3.8% 5.1% 3.7% 2.8%  0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 2014 2019   20 City of Meridian, Idaho Health Ranking   The United Health Foundation has ranked Idaho 18th in its State Health Rankings in 2014, down from  12th in 2013 (americashealthrankings.org/id). The State’s biggest strengths include:    Low incidence of infectious disease   High per capita public health funding   Low rate of preventable hospitalizations    Some of the challenges the State faces include:   High levels of air pollution   Low immunization coverage among teens   Limited availability of primary care physicians    In the 2014 Idaho County Health Rankings (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,  countyhealthrankings.org), Ada County ranked 6th out of 42 counties for health outcomes and 2nd for  health factors. As explained in the health ranking report, “Health outcomes represent how healthy a  county is while health factors represent what influences the health of the county.”2    B. Park and Recreation Influencing Trends  It is a challenge and an opportunity for parks and recreation providing agencies to continue to  understand and respond to the changing recreation interests of serviced populations. In this fast‐paced  society, it is important to stay on top of current trends. The following highlights relevant local, regional,  and national recreation trends relative to the Meridian demographic and identified interests. More detail  is found in Appendix A.    Demographic Trends   Millennials lead structured lives filled with rules and regulations. Less accustomed to  unstructured play than previous generations and apprehensive of the outdoors, they spend  most of their time indoors, leaving home primarily to socialize with friends and families. With an  upbeat and a can‐do attitude, this generation is more optimistic and tech‐savvy than its elders.   With their varied life experiences, values, and expectations, Baby Boomers are predicted to  redefine the meaning of recreation and leisure programming for mature adults. Boomers are  second only to Gen Y/Millennials (born between 1980 and 1999) in participation in fitness and  outdoor sports. Boomers will reinvent what being a 65‐year‐old means.   Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much higher rates than adults in age  brackets 30 and older.      Facility Trends   Design of a community’s infrastructure is directly linked to physical activity – where  environments are built with bicyclists and pedestrians in mind, more people bike and walk.  Higher levels of bicycling and walking also coincide with increased bicycle and pedestrian safety  and higher levels of physical activity. Increasing bicycling and walking make a big impact on  improving public health and life expectancy.                                                               2 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, “County Health Rankings and Roadmaps: 2014 Rankings – Idaho,”  http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/idaho/2014/rankings/ada/county/outcomes/overall/snapshot accessed on  February 18, 2015.    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 21  For the second year, dog parks were the top planned addition to parks and recreational facilities  in the country in 2013. Dog parks can be as simple as a gated area, or more elaborate with  “designed‐for‐dogs” amenities like water fountains, agility equipment, and pet wash stations, to  name a few.    Communities around the country are considering adding shade structures, as well as shade trees  to their parks, playgrounds, and pools as “a weapon against cancer and against childhood  obesity.”    The fact that a connected system of pathways increases the level of physical activity in a  community has been scientifically demonstrated through the Pathways for Health  initiative of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Pathways can provide a wide variety  of opportunities for being physically active.   Park and recreation agencies have begun installing “outdoor gyms,” with equipment  comparable to what would be found in an indoor workout facility, such as leg and chest  presses, elliptical trainers, pull down trainers, etc. Such equipment can increase the  usage of parks, pathways, and other outdoor amenities while helping to fight the  obesity epidemic and increase the community’s interaction with nature.   There is an increasing trend toward indoor leisure and therapeutic pools. Additional  amenities, such as “splash pads,” are popular as well.    Programming Trends   Figures from the Association for Interpretative Naturalists demonstrate that nature‐based  programs are on the rise. The growth of these programs is thought to come from replacing  grandparents as the teacher about the “great outdoors.” It is also speculated that a return to  natural roots and renewed interest in life’s basic elements was spurred as a response to  September 11, 2001.   Participation in walking for pleasure and family gatherings outdoors were the two most popular  activities for the U.S. population as a whole as reported in a 2012 report. These outdoor  activities were followed closely in popularity by viewing/photographing wildlife, boating, fishing,  snow/ice activities, and swimming. There has been a growing momentum in participation in  sightseeing, birding, and wildlife watching in recent years.    Some of the top ten athletic activities ranked by total participation include: exercise walking,  swimming, exercising with equipment, camping, and bicycle riding.    A national trend in the delivery of parks and recreation systems reflects more partnerships and  contractual agreements reaching out to the edges of the community to support specialized  services.   The majority of Americans agree that preserving undeveloped land for outdoor recreation is  important. A large percentage of outdoor participants also believe that developing local parks  and hiking and walking pathways is important and that there should be more outdoor education  and activities during the school day.       22 City of Meridian, Idaho Funding Trends   According to Recreation Management magazine’s “2013 State of the Industry Report,” survey  respondents from parks and recreation departments/districts reporting about their revenues  from 2009 through 2014 reveals the impact of the recession, as well as the beginning of a  recovery. More than 25 percent of respondents saw their revenues decrease from 2009 to 2010,  and 21.8 percent of respondents reported a further decrease in 2011. Forty‐four percent (44%)  of park and recreation respondents reported increases from 2011 to 2012.     C. Community and Stakeholder Input   Public process for the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan was held January 26 – 28, 2015 and  consisted of 125 participants in eight focus groups, eight stakeholder interviews, and a public forum.  This section summarizes the key issues and input that was gathered from the meetings. A full summary  of all public input can be found in Appendix B.    The community input summary is categorized below with brief details from the many focus group  meetings.    Strengths and Opportunities for  Improvement  The residents of Meridian benefit from a  good geographic distribution of parks  throughout the City, with some pockets of  underserved areas. Participants embrace the  fact that their parks form the heart of the  community and feel like the programs  offered are well run, diverse, affordable, and  operated by dedicated employees, and as  such, indicate that they feel the quality of  programs currently offered are very good.  Participants also recognized that the parks  are well maintained and have unique and innovative features. When asked about areas for  improvement, participants identified the disconnected pathway system, the need for a larger indoor  recreation facility, and the need to keep up with the city’s rapid growth as top priorities. Other general  items, such as a perceived lack of parking, shade, field space for non‐traditional sports, and off‐leash dog  areas were all identified as opportunities for improvement. Along with physical improvements,  improvement of communication, and availability of information is also important to users.    Satisfaction  Residents are very satisfied with the programs, the quality of existing infrastructure, and maintenance.  They also rated customer service and seeking community feedback as very good.       Parks and Recreation Master Plan 23 Programming and Activities, and Locations  Meridian residents love their programs and activities. They are very satisfied but do have an apparent  demand for more year‐round program offerings. Included among the additional programs are more  offerings for seniors and teens, special events, performing arts, outdoor recreation and adventure  programs, non‐sports activities, and adaptive recreation. Two areas of the community were identified as  being underserved, and may benefit from future park development. These were South and West  Meridian. Certain demographics may also be underserved, including seniors and teens, as well as active  adults and Millennials.      New Facilities  When asked for suggestions of new parks and recreation facilities in the City, participants identified:   Pathway connectivity   Fieldhouse/gym space   Parks in South and West Meridian   Additional athletic fields   Large community center   Exercise stations    Performing Arts Center   Iconic/Destination Parks    Values  City of Meridian residents value their parks and recreation system and feel like they get very good  service from staff. Participants’ number one value was family‐oriented programming and activities. They  also want good communication about happenings and program offerings. Quality and affordable  programming is a priority, while ensuring access to diverse offerings throughout the entire city.  Providing a balance between passive and active recreation, as well as organized sports and unstructured  activities, is very important to the community.    D. Random Invitation Community Survey Summary  Introduction and Methodology  The purpose of this study was to gather public feedback on City of Meridian parks and recreation  facilities, services, and programs. This survey research effort and subsequent analysis were designed to  assist the City of Meridian in the creation of a master plan for existing and possible future  enhancements, facilities, and services.    The survey was conducted using three primary methods: 1) a mail‐back survey, 2) an online, invitation‐ only web survey to further encourage response from those residents already within the defined  invitation sample, and 3) an open‐link online survey for members of the public who were not part of the  invitation sample. The analysis primarily focuses on responses from the invitation sample. However,  open link responses are additionally analyzed and discussed, particularly when they differ from the  invitation sample.             24 City of Meridian, Idaho A total of 3,500 surveys were mailed to a random sample of Meridian residents in March 2015. The final  sample size for this statistically valid survey was 731, resulting in a margin of error of approximately +/‐  3.6 percentage points calculated for questions at 50 percent response.3 The open link survey received an  additional 661 responses.    The underlying data were weighted by age, ethnicity, and area of impact by neighborhood to ensure  appropriate representation of Meridian residents across different demographic cohorts in the sample.  Using the ESRI Demographic and Income Profile, which generates a 2014 population profile using 2010  Census data, the age distribution and ethnicity distribution within the respondent sample was matched  to the 2014 demographic profile of the City of Meridian. In addition, the neighborhood distribution  within the respondent sample was matched to the 2015 area of impact by region as provided by the  City.    Current Facilities and Programs  Importance of Local Recreation Opportunities. Respondents were asked to indicate the importance of  the availability of local parks and recreation opportunities to their household on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1  meaning “not at all important” and 5 meaning “very important.” Respondents generally indicated that  local recreation opportunities are very important to their household, with 84 percent of invitation  respondents and 91 percent of open link respondents providing a 4 or 5 rating. Average importance  ratings were similarly high in both the invitation (4.2) and open link (4.5) samples.    Knowledge/Familiarity with Current Meridian Parks and Recreation Offerings. Respondents were also  asked to rate their level of familiarity with current Meridian parks and recreation facilities, programs,  and services on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means “not at all familiar” and 5 means “very familiar.” Ratings  of familiarity were not as high as ratings of importance, particularly among invitation respondents.  Forty‐three percent (43%) of invitation respondents provided a 4 or 5 rating (average rating 3.4),  compared to 70 percent of open link respondents (average 3.8).    Participation in Meridian Parks and Recreation Classes and Programs. Nineteen percent (19%) of  invitation respondents and 34 percent of open link respondents indicated that they have registered for a  Department program or class during the past year.    Ratings of Service Received. Respondents who indicated that they had registered for classes or programs  in the past year were asked to rate the service they received on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 meaning “poor”  and 5 meaning “excellent.” Satisfaction with their program or class was very high, with 95 percent of  invitation respondents and 91 percent of open link respondents providing a 4 or 5 rating and an average  satisfaction rating of 4.4 for both samples.    Most Used Facilities and Parks. Respondents were provided a list of 18 facilities and parks operated by  the City of Meridian. They were then prompted to indicate the three facilities they use most often.                                                                  3For the total invitation sample size of 731, margin of error is +/‐ 3.6 percent calculated for questions at 50% response (if the  response for a particular question is “50%”—the standard way to generalize margin of error is to state the larger margin, which  occurs for responses at 50%). Note that the margin of error is different for every single question response on the survey  depending on the resultant sample sizes, proportion of responses, and number of answer categories for each question.  Comparison of differences in the data between various segments, therefore, should take into consideration these factors. As a  General comment, it is sometimes more appropriate to focus attention on the general trends and patterns in the data rather  than on the individual percentages.    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 25 Use by Sample. Figure 5, in the following section, explores the top three most used facilities and parks  by survey sample. The following facilities were used most commonly by invitation respondents: Settlers  Park (70%), Storey Park (53%), Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park (46%), Tully Park (39%), and Bear Creek  Park (17%). Open link respondents also most frequently used Settlers Park (80%), followed by Julius M.  Kleiner Memorial Park (58%), Tully Park (28%), Storey Park (26%), and Bear Creek Park (17%).    Invitation respondents are more likely to use Storey Park and Tully Park on a regular basis, while open  link respondents have a higher likelihood of utilizing Settlers Park, Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park,  Heroes Park, and the Heritage Middle School Ball Fields.    Importance of Facilities to Household. On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is “not at all important” and 5 is  “very important,” respondents rated the importance of Meridian Parks and Recreation facilities to their  households. Figure 5 to follow illustrates the percentage of “4” and “5” responses (indicating that the  respondent feels the facility is important) versus the percentage of “1” and “2” responses (indicating  that the respondent feels the facility is not important) among invitation respondents. Figure 5 depicts  the average importance rating provided by invitation respondents for each facility. The highest average  ratings and largest shares of “4” and “5” responses were given for the following facilities:   Pathways (average rating 4.2; 82% rated a 4 or 5)   Playgrounds (4.1 average; 77% rated 4 or 5)   Picnic shelters (3.8 average; 69% rated 4 or 5)   Swimming pools/aquatic facilities (3.7 average; 56% rated 4 or 5)   Community/recreation center (3.6 average; 56% rated 4 or 5)   Indoor gym space (3.3 average; 49% rated 4 or 5)   Splash pads (3.3 average; 48% rated 4 or 5)   Athletic fields (3.3 average; 43% rated 4 or 5)   Outdoor basketball courts (3.1 average; 43% rated 4 or 5)    Importance vs. Needs‐Met Matrix – Current Facilities. It is informative to plot and compare the facility  scores for level of importance and degree to which needs are being met by these facilities using an  “Importance vs. Needs‐Met” matrix. Scores are displayed in this matrix using the mid‐points for both  questions to divide into four quadrants. The Importance scale midpoint was 3.3 (the median importance  rating across all facilities); the Needs‐Met midpoint was 3.4 (see Figure 5).    The upper right quadrant shows the facilities that have a high average rating of importance as well as a  high level of needs being met. These amenities are less of a priority for improvement since needs are  currently being met, but are important to maintain in the future as they are perceived to be important  by respondents:   Playgrounds   Picnic shelters   Splash pads (on the cusp of low importance)              26 City of Meridian, Idaho Facilities located in the upper left quadrant have relatively high importance but a lower level of needs  being met, which suggests that these facilities could be improved. Improving these facilities would  positively impact the degree to which household needs are being met overall:   Pathways   Swimming pools/aquatic facilities   Community/recreation center   Indoor gym space (on the cusp of low importance)    The lower right quadrant shows facilities that are not important to many households, yet are meeting  their needs very well. It may be beneficial in the future to evaluate the parks and recreation resources  supporting these facilities:   Athletic fields   Outdoor basketball courts   Ball fields    Finally, facilities in the lower left quadrant are not meeting needs adequately; however, they are  important to a smaller group of community members. These “niche” facilities may have a small but  passionate following; therefore, there may be merit in measuring participation and planning for future  improvements accordingly:   Tennis courts   Dog parks   Rodeo grounds       Parks and Recreation Master Plan 27 Figure 6: Current Facilities – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix  Invitation Sample Only                          2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 How Well Needs Are Currently Being Met (Average Rating) 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Splash Pads Rodeo Grounds Picnic Shelters Outdoor Basketball Courts Community/Rec. Center Ball Fields Athletic Fields Tennis Courts Playgrounds Pathways/Trails Indoor Gym Space Dog Parks Fac Imp Fac Needs High Importance/ Low Needs Met High Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ Low Needs Met Level of Importance vs. Needs Met for Current MPRD Facilities -Invitation Sample Only   28 City of Meridian, Idaho Importance of Programs to Household. Similarly, on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is “not at all important”  and 5 is “very important,” respondents rated the importance of Meridian Parks and Recreation  programs to their households. The programs that received the highest average ratings and greatest  proportion of “4” and “5” ratings from invitation respondents include:   Youth sports (average rating 3.7; 64% provided a 4 or 5 rating)   Family programs (3.7 average; 69% rated 4 or 5)   Outdoor adventure programs (3.5 average; 50% rated 4 or 5)   Youth programs (3.5 average; 57% rated 4 or 5)   Senior programs (3.3 average; 50% rated 4 or 5)   Adult programs (3.2 average; 36% rated 4 or 5)   Youth camps (3.2 average; 41% rated 4 or 5)   Teen programs (3.1 average; 40% rated 4 or 5)    Importance vs. Needs‐Met Matrix – Current Programs. Another “Importance vs. Needs‐Met” matrix  allows a comparison of programs based on level of importance and degree to which household needs  are being met. Scores are depicted in this matrix by using the mid‐points for both questions to divide  into four quadrants. The Importance scale midpoint was 3.3 (the median rating for importance across all  programs); the Needs‐Met midpoint was 3.6 (see Figure 6).    Programs in the upper right quadrant are considered to be highly important and are also adequately  meeting the needs of respondent households. Though it is less critical to consider future enhancements  for these programs, it is necessary to maintain them to keep community satisfaction high:   Youth sports   Youth programs    The upper left quadrant displays programs that are perceived as important but have a lower level of  needs being met. Therefore, improvements to and monitoring of these programs may boost the degree  to which community members feel their household needs are being met:   Family programs   Outdoor adventure programs    The programs located in the lower right quadrant are less important to households, but are currently  meeting their needs well:    Senior programs   Adult programs   Youth camps   Teen programs   Adult sports    Finally, programs found in the lower left quadrant are amenities that are not meeting needs well,  though they are not important to the majority of households in Meridian. These programs are  considered “niche” amenities, as they are important to fewer members of the community. None of the  programs evaluated by respondents fell into this category, which may make future planning and of parks  and recreation resources easier.        Parks and Recreation Master Plan 29 Figure 7: Current Programs – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix  Invitation Sample Only      Values and Vision  Top Areas Parks & Recreation Should Focus on Improving  Respondents were asked to identify three community issues that Meridian Parks and Recreation should  focus on improving from a list of potential areas. From the list, respondents indicated their number one  priority, number two priority, and number three priority. As is shown below in Figure 7, invitation  respondents indicated that the top community issue is pathway connectivity (44 percent selected this as  one of their top three priorities). Pathway connectivity also had the highest percentage of respondents  identifying it as their number one priority (33%). Other important community issues include promoting  healthy/active lifestyles (33%), family‐oriented activities (30%), maintenance of parks and facilities  (25%), safety and security (25%), community‐wide special events (25%), and aquatic  facilities/programming (24%).      3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 How Well Needs Are Currently Being Met (Average Rating) 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 Youth Sports Youth Programs Youth Camps Family Programs Adult Programs Teen Programs Senior Programs Outdoor Adventure Programs Adult Sports Prog Needs Prog Imp High Importance/ Low Needs Met High Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ Low Needs Met Low Importance/ High Needs Met Level of Importance vs. Needs Met for Current MPRD Programs -Invitation Sample Only   30 City of Meridian, Idaho Figure 8: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined  Invitation Sample Only                 Parks and Recreation Master Plan 31 Future Facilities, Amenities, and Services  Importance of Adding/Expanding/Improving Future Facilities  On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “not at all important” and 5 means “very important,”  respondents rated the importance of the 26 potential future facilities. In general, most facilities were  rated as highly important. The facilities that received the highest average ratings and largest share of  respondents providing 4 or 5 ratings include:   Indoor facilities   Indoor aquatics facility (average rating 3.8; 62% provided a 4 or 5 rating)   Community/recreation center (3.7 average; 62% rated 4 or 5)   Fieldhouse/gymnasium space (3.2 average; 38% rated 4 or 5)   Performing arts center (3.2 average; 36% rated 4 or 5)   Ice rink (3.0 average; 41% rated 4 or 5)     Outdoor facilities   Pathways (4.1 average; 78% rated 4 or 5)   Shade structures in parks (4.0 average; 78% rated 4 or 5)   Improved park amenities (3.8 average; 70% rated 4 or 5)   Playgrounds (3.7 average; 65% rated 4 or 5)   Lights for outdoor athletic facilities (3.4 average; 49% rated 4 or 5)   New parks (3.2 average; 33% rated 4 or 5)   Exercise stations along pathways in parks (3.2 average; 39% rated 4 or 5)   Splash pads (3.1 average; 40% rated 4 or 5)   Outdoor athletic fields/courts (3.1 average; 31% rated 4 or 5)   Public art in the parks (3.1 average; 40% rated 4 or 5)   Fishing ponds (3.1 average; 42% rated 4 or 5)   Parking at recreational facilities (3.1 average; 28% rated 4 or 5)   Dog parks (3.0 average; 39% rated 4 or 5)    Top Priorities to Add, Expand, or Improve  Using the same list of facilities, respondents chose their priorities for most important future facilities to  their households. The facility with the highest percentage of respondents selecting it as their first most  important priority is a community/recreation center (16%). Other top priorities include an indoor  aquatics facility (33%), community/recreation center (26%), improved park amenities (22%), and shade  structures in parks (22%).       32 City of Meridian, Idaho Financial Choices/Fees  In a final section of the survey, respondents answered questions about their opinions on the financial  aspects of their relationship with Meridian Parks and Recreation. These questions include an evaluation  of current program and facility fees, the impact of potential fee increases on level of participation, and  an allocation of future funding toward various amenities.     Current Fees  Facility Fees. Respondents were generally likely to indicate that current facility fees are reasonable, with  30 percent of invitation respondents and 48 percent of open link respondents feeling that fees are  acceptable for the value received. Eleven percent (11%) of invitation respondents feel that fees are too  high, and only two percent said fees were underpriced. Fifty‐seven percent (57%) were unsure.    Program Fees. Similarly, 29 percent of invitation respondents and 54 percent of open link respondents  believe that current program fees are reasonable. Fourteen percent (14%) of invitation sample  respondents indicated that fees are too expensive, and one percent said they are underpriced. Fifty‐six  percent (56%) didn’t know.    Allocation of Funding  Lastly, respondents were asked, “If you had $100 to spend on parks and recreation facilities, services,  and/or programs, how would you allocate that $100 across the following categories?” and were  provided with a list of nine potential categories for funding. As shown in Figure 8, invitation respondents  allocated funding most toward expanding aquatics ($19.44 on average) and adding more pathways  ($17.69), followed by making improvements and/or renovating/maintaining existing park facilities  ($12.62), and expanding programs/activities ($11.29). Items that received little funding include  providing more City‐wide special events ($5.02) and a new or expanded Community Center ($6.16).                                                   Parks and Recreation Master Plan 33 Figure 9: Allocation of Funding Toward Facilities/Services/Programs – Average Allocation Amount      E. Organizational and Marketing Analysis   Organizational Analysis  GreenPlay broadly assessed the organizational and management structure of the Parks and Recreation  Department and staffing to determine effectiveness and efficiency in meeting current and future  departmental responsibilities as related to the community’s needs. The needs assessment – including  input from staff interviews, community and key stakeholder engagement, and level of service analysis,  along with the consultant’s expertise – has identified a few areas for operational enhancement.    These key organizational issues identified and observed as areas for improvement include:   Better marketing and communication of activities   Enhance and improve internal and external communication    Improve the website so it is current and usable for patrons   Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies   Improve and update park and wayfinding signage and maps  Increase appropriate partnerships within the community  Invitation Sample Open Link $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 Average Amount Allocated $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 Average Amount Allocated Expand aquatics Add more pathways Make improvements and/or renovate and maintain existing park facilities Expand programs and activities Recreation center Add new parks Add outdoor athletic fields and courts New or expanded Community Center Provide more City-wide special events Other enhancements $17.69 $11.29 $19.44 $12.62 $8.75 $8.63 $6.16 $3.27 $7.14 $5.02 $16.29 $10.79 $16.84 $11.74 $10.91 $5.85 $5.79 $6.59 $5.37 $9.82 If you had $100 to spend on parks and recreation facilities, services, and/or pro- grams, how would you allocate that $100 across the following categories?   34 City of Meridian, Idaho Staffing Analysis  GreenPlay broadly assessed the management structure and staffing levels of the Parks and Recreation  Department to determine effectiveness and efficiency in meeting current and future departmental  responsibilities as related to the community’s needs. Many observations were taken into account to  determine if the Parks and Recreation Department had the right mix of staffing in the right places within  the Department.     The staffing analysis process included the observations and assessments of:   Community input   Community satisfaction rates   Staff focus group   Individual staff interviews   Facility tours   Observations of quality of maintenance   Professional knowledge in Parks and Recreation organizations   SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, & Threats)   Organizational chart    Staffing Considerations  After considering all of the organizational observations and staffing assessment, the consultant team has  determined that the Parks and Recreation Department has an adequate number of staff to operate its  current system with the right mix of staff in the right places within the Department. To operate more  effectively in the future and to implement the Master Plan, Parks and Recreation should consider:   Staffing appropriately to maintain a current FTE for park maintenance based on acres of park  land maintained per FTE   Developing a standard for recreation staffing that considers:   Number of sports teams managed per FTE   Number of Temporary Use Permits issued and managed per FTE   Number of programs and participation rates managed per FTE   Add grant research and writer position (staff or contractual)   Ensure that staffing resource levels can maintain existing and new facilities at or above  acceptable standards as the Master Plan is implemented    Marketing  The main reasons for not using Meridian programs or amenities include:   Focus group participants indicated not aware of programs or facility    Therefore, it is important that the Department improve communications with residents about  program/event offerings and Department information.   Increasing the use of social media    Incorporating smart phone app offerings like that of the GoStrive App which can help:   Build a stronger, healthier community through activities and programs   Cultivate an interactive link between agencies and participating individuals   Optimize programs with powerful analytics to reduce costs and generate revenue   NRPA member? Join the “GoStrive. Go Play.” campaign – it’s free!      Parks and Recreation Master Plan 35 G. Recreation Programming Analysis  Program Development  Understanding core services in the delivery of parks and recreation services will allow the City of  Meridian Parks and Recreation Department to improve upon those areas while developing strategies to  assist in the delivery of other services. The basis of determining core services should come from the  vision and mission developed by the City and what brings the greatest community benefit in balance  with the competencies of the Department, current trends, and the market.     The Department should pursue program development around the priorities identified by customer  feedback, program evaluation process, and research. The following criteria should be examined when  developing new programs.    Need: outgrowth of a current popular program, or enough demonstrated demand to  successfully support a minimal start (one class for instance)   Budget: accounting for all costs and anticipated (conservative) revenues should meet cost  recovery target established by the Department   Location: appropriate, available, and within budget   Instructor: qualified, available, and within budget   Materials and supplies: available and within budget   Marketing effort: adequate and timely opportunity to reach intended market, within budget  (either existing marketing budget or as part of new program budget)     Further research into what types of programming would be successful needs to be done. Successful  programs utilize continuous creative assessments, research, and planning. The Department has a  process that evaluates the success of current program offerings and criteria to determine if new  program ideas should be instituted or if changes should be made to current programs. Maintaining the  current dashboards and evaluation process will help to ensure success.    Moreover, new leisure and recreation trends may drive different needs. It is very easy to focus on  programs that have worked for a number of years, especially if they are still drawing enough interested  participants to justify the program’s continuation. Starting new programs, based on community demand  and/or trends, can be risky, due to the inability to predict their success. If the program interest seems  great, as with those identified in the citizen survey, then the programs should be expanded. Available  space may hinder new or expanded opportunities in some cases.     Using historical participation levels to determine program popularity and participant feedback can be  helpful in deciding if programs should be continued. In addition, utilizing citizen surveys and participant  feedback, and researching trends in park and recreational programming are useful tools in determining  future programming needs and desires. Sources for trends information include:    State Parks and Recreation Associations and Conferences   National Recreation and Parks Association   International Health, Racquet, and Sports Association   Parks and Recreation Trade Publications   Outdoor Recreation Publications      36 City of Meridian, Idaho Program Evaluation  All current programs should be evaluated annually to determine if they should be continued, changed  (market segment focus, time/day offered, etc.), or discontinued. A few simple questions should be asked  about each program that includes:    Is participation increasing or decreasing? If participation is increasing, then it could clearly mean  that the program should be continued. If participation is decreasing, are there any steps to take  to increase interest through marketing efforts, a change in the time/day of the program is  offered, and a change in the format or instructor? If not, it may be time to discontinue the  program.    Is there information contained in the participation feedback that can be used to improve the  program?    Are cost recovery goals being met? If not, can fees be realistically increased?   Is there another provider of the program that is more suitable to offer it? If yes, the Department  could provide referrals for its customers for the program it does not or is not willing or able to  offer.    Is this program taking up facility space that could be used for expansion of more popular  programs or new programs in demand by the community?     H. Operations and Maintenance Analysis  Parks and Recreation is responsible for maintaining public open spaces and for providing a quality  system of parks and recreation facilities and positive leisure opportunities available to all persons in the  community. The Department also is responsible for the development and maintenance of the pathways  system and the urban forest. The Meridian Parks and Recreation system consists of 387 acres of  parkland, 255 acres of developed parks and 132 acres of undeveloped land. The system is made up of 19  parks (not including Lakeview Golf Course): 3 undeveloped sites, just less than 22 miles of pathways, 13  miles of micro pathways, a senior center, and a community center. Additionally, Parks and Recreation  offers a variety of recreational programs, adult sports leagues, special events, and handles shelter  reservations and temporary use permits.    Community Input    Focus Groups  Public Process for the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan was held January 26 – 28, 2015 and  consisted of 125 participants in eight focus groups, 8 stakeholder interviews and a public forum.    Focus Groups were asked, “What are the strengths of the Parks and Recreation Department that should  be continued over the next several years?”      The top 3 responses were:   1. High quality parks  2. Parks well maintained  3. Innovative unique parks            Parks and Recreation Master Plan 37 Other top responses included:  1. Parks well distributed  2. Variety of amenities  3. Commitment to maintenance  4. Athletic field good quality  5. Number of parks    Focus Group attendees were asked, “What improvements are needed at existing facilities?” The top  responses were:  1. Disconnected pathways  2. Parking at most parks during major events  3. Shade and mature trees in parks  4. Field space for diversity of sports    Maintenance  The City of Meridian and the Department are committed to the highest levels of maintenance. As part of  the newly adopted Strategic Plan for the City and the CARE (Customer Service, Accountability, Respect,  and Excellence) Values, commitment to excellence is clearly defined. Maintenance throughout the year  takes many forms and task including (but not limited to) mowing, snow removal at multiple sites,  downtown tree and flower pot upkeep, event support, irrigation, urban forestry, playgrounds, and  ballfield grooming. Using existing data from the Parks and Recreation dashboards, the graphs below  illustrate the growth in total park acreage, park acreage per 1,000 persons and the linear feet of  pathways maintained by the Department.    Figure 10: Park Acreage            0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 To t a l P a r k A c r e s Year Meridian Park Acreage Added Park Acres Existing Park Acres   38 City of Meridian, Idaho Figure 11: Pathways Maintained      Figure 12: Developed Park Acres per 1,000 People      Conclusion  As the parks and recreation system continues to expand and maintenance responsibilities increase,  staffing and equipment levels must be increased to meet citizen expectations and protect the City’s  investment. In addition to new facilities, an emphasis was identified through the focus groups of  maintaining current facilities that continue to provide a safe, functional, and aesthetically pleasing park  system.            0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Li n e a l F e e t o f M a i n t a i n e d P a t h w a y s Year Pathways Maintained by the City Lineal Feet of Maintained Pathways Added Existing Lineal Feet of Maintained Pathways 0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Ac r e s p e r T h o u s a n d P e o p l e To t a l P a r k A c r e s Year Meridian Park Acreage Total Park Acres Acres/thousand people   Parks and Recreation Master Plan 39 As the population of Meridian continues to grow, significant investment will need to be made to  maintain the current level of service at four acres of developed park land per 1,000 people. COMPASS  estimates that the population of Meridian will grow to 151,081 by the year 2040. To maintain the  current level of service, it will require 604 acres of developed park land. That will require the  development of the existing 132 acres of undeveloped park land and the addition of 217 acres of park  land. Additionally, to complete the pathway system, it will take community investment and cooperation  from the private sector.    Specific recommendations for parks operations are:   Continue to develop and review written maintenance standards.   Continue to maintain quality standard park area maintenance.   Continue providing staff training that is appropriate for the assigned areas of expertise.   Evaluate the distribution of maintenance staff and areas of responsibilities to ensure the  greatest efficiencies of resources on a regular basis.   Plan for additional needs for staffing, equipment, and resources as the Department continues to  grow in response to development and growth in Meridian.   Continuously evaluate existing facilities, develop maintenance needs, and perform identified  upgrades that maintain user expectations and quality standards.     I. Financial Analysis  Funding Resources & Cost Recovery, Current Circumstances  Parks and Recreation facilities, programs, and services are very important to the community and are in  high demand. However, not all facilities, programs, and services are equal. In general, the more a  facility, program, or service provides a community benefit to citizens of Meridian as a whole, the more  that element is paid for by all citizens as part of the City’s general fund. The more a facility, program, or  service provides individual benefits, the more that element is paid for by user fees. This funding and cost  recovery philosophy acknowledges the tremendous public benefits of parks and recreation to the  community, not only in the obvious ways it provides recreational opportunities to the citizens, but for  the sometimes unrecognized benefits of promoting economic development, crime prevention, and  community health. In all cases, the City seeks to leverage partnerships wherever possible and in the best  interest of the citizens to help fund the facilities, programs, and services they provide to the community.    The following are some specific examples of how various Parks and Recreation facilities, programs, and  services fall on that continuum and how they are paid for.    Park Construction  New park construction relies on impact fees whenever possible for funding a new park that is being  developed to maintain the existing level of service (defined for this purpose in acres per thousand  residents). When impact fees are not available or when developing parks to increase the level of  service, general funds are used. Grants are also sought, such as those from the Solid Waste Advisory  Commission (SWAC), the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and other sources.  Whenever possible and in the best interest of the City, partnerships are also used to help develop  new parks and/or specific amenities within them.             40 City of Meridian, Idaho Park Maintenance  Park maintenance benefits the entire community and is funded from the City’s General Fund.  Volunteers are leveraged wherever possible to help save labor and costs.     Sports  In the sports programs, Meridian recovers all direct  costs (balls, nets, bases, etc.) through user fees.  Fees also cover the costs for all part‐time and  seasonal labor (scorekeepers, umpires, etc.) directly  associated with the program. A 20 percent  administrative charge is added to cover a portion of  the time associated with full‐time staff (recreation  coordinator, front desk) that plan and support the  sports leagues. The Department charges an  additional fee (currently $10 per player) as non‐ resident fees, for participants who do not pay taxes  to the City of Meridian.    Classes & Camps  For classes and camps, fees are set to recover all direct costs, based on the anticipated number of  participants. Direct costs include all part‐time/seasonal staffing for the camp, supplies, equipment,  and transportation. A 10 percent administrative charge is added to help cover a portion of the time  associated with full‐time staff (recreation coordinator, front desk) that plan and support the camps.  Most classes are taught by independent contractors, where the contractor establishes the fee and  the Department requires a 20 percent split of their fee to come to the City to cover the  administrative costs of scheduling the classes and publishing the Activity Guide.    Events  The cost recovery philosophy for events varies by event. For example, some events (i.e., CableOne  Movie Night, Community Block Party, and Christmas in Meridian) are paid for up front by the City,  with the understanding that the Department will generate the revenue to break even on all direct  costs through the sale of sponsorships, concessions revenue, etc. A second type of event is one that  the City chooses to pay for. With these events (Gene Kleiner Day, Independence Day Celebration),  there has been a deliberate decision by the City not to seek sponsorships. For Gene Kleiner Day, the  focus is on Gene Kleiner and his donation of Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park. Currently, revenues  from the Mayor’s State of the City Address are helping to cover the costs of this event. For the  Independence Day Celebration, there are matching funds from the Meridian Speedway for fireworks  and putting on a community celebration in Storey Park and the City of Meridian is the presenting  sponsor. The third type of event is fundraisers. With these events (i.e., Barn Sour Race, Disc Golf Fall  Classic) all direct costs are paid for by the event, and revenues are maximized. All additional  revenues, after expenses, are used for a specific purpose—for example, proceeds from the Barn  Sour Race help to fund the Care Enough to Share fund, and the Disc Golf Fall Classic helps to fund a  specific park improvement to be selected by the Parks and Recreation Commission. For outside  events put on through Temporary Use Permits (TUP) in parks, the event organizers are expected to  cover all costs, including staffing costs for City staff that have to be at the event for set‐up, trash  collection, and other duties.         Parks and Recreation Master Plan 41 Pathways  When developed by the City, pathways are paid for by the City’s General Fund or grants, not impact  fees. Impact fees are not currently charged for pathways, because most pathways are required to be  constructed through the development process.      Memorial Tree Program  The Memorial Tree Program is set up to cover all direct costs associated with creating and placing  the plaque. The fee structure should be revisited with a look at covering the long term costs and  possible revenue generation for the City.    Picnic Shelter Reservations  Fees for shelter reservations are set to cover the direct costs for cleaning the shelter and posting the  reservation. High‐demand shelters may be set higher as a potential revenue source for the City.  These fees have not changed in many years and should be revisited and updated.    Field/Court Reservations  Field/court reservation fees (i.e., softball field, soccer field, tennis court, etc.) are set based on  regional trends for fees, supply and demand, and what the City Council determines to be in the best  interest of the City. These fees should be periodically reviewed and updated.    Financial Sustainability  It is important for the City to develop a Resource Allocation and Pricing Philosophy that reflects the  values of the community and the responsibility it has to the community. This Philosophy will be  especially important if the City moves forward with the development of new programs, additional  and/or expanded facilities, and as it strives for sustainability and determines how much it is willing to  subsidize operations with tax dollars.     One means of accomplishing this goal is applying a process using an industry tool called the “Pyramid  Methodology.” This methodology develops and implements a refined cost recovery philosophy and  pricing policy based on current “best practices” as determined by the mission of the agency and the  program’s benefit to the community and/or individual.     Critical to this philosophical undertaking is the support and understanding of elected officials and  ultimately citizens. Whether or not significant changes are called for, the agency wants to be certain that  it is philosophically aligned with its residents. The development of the core services, cost recovery  philosophy, and policy is built on a very logical foundation, using the understanding of who is benefitting  from recreation services to determine how the costs for that service should be offset.     Recreation programs and services are sorted along a continuum of what delivers the greatest  community benefit to what delivers the greatest individual benefit. The amount of subsidy for each level  (not necessarily each individual program) is then determined to create an overall cost recovery  philosophy.               42 City of Meridian, Idaho Developing effective ongoing systems that help measure success in reaching cost recovery goals and  anticipate potential pitfalls are dependent on the following:    Understanding of current revenue streams and their sustainability.   Tracking all expenses and revenues for programs, facilities, and services to understand their  contributions to overall department cost recovery.   Analyzing who is benefiting from programs, facilities, and services and to what degree they  should be subsidized.    Acknowledging the full cost of each program (those direct and indirect costs associated with  program delivery) and where the program fits on the continuum, of who benefits from the  program or service to determine appropriate cost recovery targets.    Defining direct costs as those that typically exist purely because of the program and the change  with the program.    Defining in‐direct costs as those that are typically costs that would exist anyway (like full‐time  staff, utilities, administration, debt service etc.).   Program fees should not be based on ability to pay, but an objective program should be in place  that allows for easy access for lower income participants, through availability of scholarships  and/or discounts. In many instances, qualification for scholarships and/or discounts can mirror  requirements for free or reduced cost lunch in schools.          Parks and Recreation Master Plan 43 IV. What We Have Now – Inventory and Level of Service Analysis   A. Inventory and Assessment  The purpose of this Level of Service (LOS) analysis is to evaluate how facilities and parks in Meridian  serve the community. This analysis may be used as a tool to benchmark current level of service and to  direct future planning efforts. Combined with other findings, including survey results and focus group  and stakeholder feedback, it also indicates the level of service anticipated by the community.    Asset Inventory  A detailed inventory of public and semi‐public physical assets available for recreational use by the  Meridian community was assembled for the Level of Service analysis. This asset inventory was created  to serve Meridian in a number of ways. It can be used for a variety of planning and operations tasks,  such as asset management and land acquisition, as well as future strategic and master plans. The assets  inventory currently includes public parks, recreation areas, and pathways managed by the City of  Meridian.     Additionally, it was recognized that alternative providers, such as Homeowners’ Associations, Schools  and Western Ada Recreation District (WARD) facilities, provide a significant inventory of neighborhood,  walk‐to, and recreation opportunities. Due to limitations of time and resources, a selected sampling of  alternative providers was included in the full inventory and level of service analysis. Additional  alternative provider facilities owned the by City of Boise and other Homeowners’ Associations were  located using existing GIS data or aerial photography identification and included for reference. Scoring  for these facilities and amenities were assumed to meet expectations and were included in the Level of  Service analysis. The following is a summary of the overall inventoried sites.    Visited and Assessed   21 Meridian Parks   217 Components   10 Indoor Facilities   Including Meridian Community Center, Senior Center, City Hall, 6 School Gymnasiums,  and YMCA Home Court   9 Alternative Provider Parks (WARD, Boise Parks, Schools)   58 Components    Included   21.8 miles of pathways, including City pathways and various Alternative Providers, and 13 miles  of Micro Paths    Located and Assumed Scoring   64 Components at other HOA parks   63 Components at other schools (See Appendix C: School Scoring Matrix)        44 City of Meridian, Idaho Map A shows the study area and key locations of properties. Larger scale maps are provided as separate  documents.    Map A: City of Meridian system map showing all inventory included for GRASP® analysis.    B. GRASP® Methodology  Level of Service for a community parks and recreation system is  indicative of the ability of people to pursue active lifestyles. It  can have implications in regard to health and wellness, the local  economy, and quality of life and tends to reflect community  values. It is emblematic of the manner and extent to which  people are connected to their communities.     The GRASP® Methodology involves mapping, scoring,  demographics, and interpretation of the resulting perspectives  to yield a picture of recreational service in a study area. The  various efforts undertaken for this study are described below  with general findings summarized in the following section.                An analytical technique known as  GRASP® (Geo‐Referenced  Amenities Standard Process) was  used to analyze Level of Service  (LOS) provided by assets in the  City of Meridian. This proprietary  process, used exclusively by  GreenPlay and Design Concepts,  yields analytical maps and data  that may be used to examine  access to recreation across the  study area. A detailed history and  description of GRASP®  Methodology may be found in  Appendix C.    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 45 Asset Scoring  In planning for the delivery of parks and recreation services, it is useful to think of parks, pathways,  indoor facilities, and other public spaces as parts of an infrastructure. This infrastructure allows people  to exercise, socialize, and maintain a healthy physical, mental, and social wellbeing. The infrastructure is  made up of components that support this goal. Components include amenities, such as playgrounds,  picnic shelters, courts, fields, indoor facilities, and other elements that allow the system to meet  recreational needs of a community. A component is a feature that people go to a park or recreation  center to use, such as a tennis court to play a game of tennis, which gives users reason to visit and serve  as an intended destination. A standardized list of GRASP® components is used to classify each asset in  the system. This list of components and definitions can be found in Appendix C: GRASP® Components  and Definitions.    In the inventory of assets, the following information is collected:    Component type and location   Evaluation of component functionality    Evaluation of associated comfort and convenience features at a location   Evaluation of general design and ambience at a location   Site photos   General comments    All components are scored based on condition, size, site capacity, and overall quality as they reflect the  expected quality of recreational features as compared with typical facilities in the City of Meridian.   A three‐tier rating system is used to evaluate these:  1 = Below Expectations   2 = Meets Expectations   3 = Exceeds Expectations          46 City of Meridian, Idaho Not all parks are created equal. GRASP® Level of Service (LOS) analysis also takes into account important  aspects of user experience often that are easily overlooked. For example, the GRASP® system  acknowledges the important differences between these identical playground structures:              The immediate surroundings of a component affect how well it functions, so in addition to scoring  components, each park site or indoor facility is given a set of scores to rate its comfort, convenience,  and ambient qualities. This includes traits, such as the availability of restrooms, drinking water, shade,  scenery, etc. These modifier values are then attributed to any component at a given location and serve  to enhance component and location scores.           Parks and Recreation Master Plan 47 A final inventory atlas is provided as a separate document. This atlas includes maps and corresponding  data, including scoring and comments for all outdoor locations. Indoor data and scoring is also included.  Below is an example of a map and data page for Champion Park from that document.      The final dataset can be used to run a variety of reports and queries. For example, summary tables can  be produced. The following summary table shows each Meridian park in the inventory, as well as each  identified recreation component available. A separate table then shows all of the indoor facilities and  their respective components.                                     THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK    Ta b l e  5:  Ou t d o o r  In v e n t o r y  Su m m a r y  Ta b l e                                         (F u l l  su m m a r y  of  al l  fa c i l i t i e s  in  da t a  se t  ca n  be  fo u n d  in  Ap p e n d i x  D : Ou t d o o r  In v e n t o r y  Su m m a r y  Ta b l e )  * Th e s e  ac r e a g e s  re f l e c t  th e  to t a l  pa r c e l s  in  GI S  an d  ar e  no t  ne c e s s a r i l y  th e  sp e c i f i c  ac r e a g e s  tracked  for  each  site  by  the  MPR  Department         LO C A T I O N C L A S S G I S  AC R E S A q u a   F e a t ,   S p r a y B a c k s t o p ,   P r a c t i c e B a l l f i e l d B a s k e t b a l l B a t t i n g   C a g e B o c c e   B a l l C o m p l e x ,   B a l l f i e l d C o m p l e x ,   H o r s e s h o e s C o m p l e x ,   T e n n i s C o n c e s s i o n s D i s k   G o l f D o g   P a r k D r i v i n g   R a n g e E d u c a t i o n a l   E x p e r i e n c e E v e n t   S p a c e G a r d e n ,   C o m m u n i t y G a r d e n ,   D i s p l a y G o l f H o r s e s h o e s L o o p   W a l k M P   F i e l d ,   A l l   S i z e s O p e n   T u r f Open Water Other‐Active Passive Node Picnic Grounds Playground, All Sizes Public Art Shelter, All Sizes Skate Park Tennis Volleyball Water Access, General Water Feature Ju l i u s  M.  Kl e i n e r  P a r k R e g i o n a l 5 7 . 9 9 2 1 1 1 . 5 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 2 5 1 3 5 12 Se t t l e r s  P a r k R e g i o n a l 5 6 . 1 2 3 1 1 6 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 6 6 2 1 4 10 Be a r  Cr e e k  P a r k C o m m u n i t y 1 8 . 8 0 1 9 2 1 1 1 1 11 He r o e s  P a r k C o m m u n i t y 3 0 . 1 5 0 1 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 21 St o r e y  P a r k C o m m u n i t y 1 7 . 9 0 4 3 2 1 3 1 1 12 Tu l l y  P a r k C o m m u n i t y 1 8 . 4 7 7 8 2 1 11 12 1 8t h  St r e e t  P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 2 . 7 8 2 9 1 11 Ch a m p i o n  P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 5 . 9 8 3 0 1 11 11 Ch a t e a u  P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 6 . 7 1 6 3 1 1 11 11 Go r d o n  Ha r r i s  P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 1 1 . 1 3 7 0 11 1 11 Re n a i s s a n c e  P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 6 . 5 2 6 4 1 11 11 Se a s o n s  P a r k N e i g h b o r h o o d 6 . 9 5 3 3 1 11 1 1 1 Ce n t e n n i a l  P a r k M i n i 0 . 4 5 2 0 0 . 5 1 1 1 1 Co x  Mo n u m e n t M i n i 0 . 1 0 8 2 1 1 1 Fi r e  St a t i o n  No . 4  P a r k M i n i 0 . 5 9 0 6 1 Ci t y  Ha l l  Pl a z a S p e c i a l  Us e 0 . 9 2 7 9 11 1 1 1 Ge n e r a t i o n s  Pl a z a S p e c i a l  Us e 0 . 2 4 7 8 11 1 He r i t a g e  Ba l l  Fi e l d s S p e c i a l  Us e 2 2 . 6 8 6 0 1 4 3 Ja b i l  Fi e l d s S p e c i a l  Us e 8 . 3 9 8 0 2 La k e v i e w  Go l f  Co u r s e G o l f 1 1 9 . 4 2 6 3 11 3 9 2 . 3 8 5 0 2 2 1 6 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 4 23 1 5 4 11 1 1 9 1 1 2 2 9 2 2 9 1 1 3 5 2 5 1 1 0 1 2 4 To t a l s :        Parks and Recreation Master Plan 51 Table 6: Indoor Inventory Summary Table                                         (All facilities in data set)    Catchment Areas  People use a variety of transit modes to reach a recreation destination: on foot, on a bike, in a car, via  public transportation, or utilizing any combination of these or other alternatives. The mode is often  determined, at least in part, by the distance to be travelled. The GRASP® system accounts for this by  applying more than one catchment area distance to examine access to assets.     A catchment area on a map, also called a buffer, is a circle drawn around each component at a specific  distance. Any point within this distance reflects the score of that component. This is called a service  area. These buffers are overlapped and used to calculate a total GRASP® Level of Service score for any  given point within the study area that reflects service from all nearby assets. This process yields the data  used to create all perspective maps and analytical charts.     The GRASP® methodology typically applies two different catchment area distances to calculate scoring  totals, yielding two distinct perspectives used to examine a recreation system:  1. General Access to Recreation  2. Walkable Access to Recreation    General Access analysis applies a primary catchment distance of one mile. This is considered a suitable  distance for a bike ride or a short drive in a car. This one‐mile catchment is intended to capture  recreational users travelling from home or elsewhere to a park or facility by way of bike, bus, or  automobile.     Walkable Access analysis uses a smaller catchment distance to capture users within walking distance of  recreation facilities. This distance can range from as short as 1/4 mile to as long as 1/2 mile, depending  on the study area. For the City of Meridian, a 1/2 mile catchment buffer was used. This catchment  distance used in GRASP® studies represents a fifteen‐minute walk for most users.      LOCATION Ga l l e r y Gy m n a s i u m Ki t c h e n  ‐   Ki t c h e n e t t e Mu l t i ‐pu r p o s e Pa t i o  / Ou t d o o r  se a t i n g Re t a i l  / Pr o ‐sh o p City Hall 2 1 Cole Valley Christian School 2 Heritage  Middle School 1 Meridian  Academy 1 Meridian  Community Center 2 Meridian  Middle  School 1 Meridian  Senior C e n t e r 1 1511 Paramount Elementary School 1 Willow Creek Elementary School 1 YMCA Homecourt 4 T o t a l s : 3 1 1 1811   52 City of Meridian, Idaho Academic and professional research is inconclusive on the topic of just how far people are willing to  walk for recreation. Some agencies have used 1/2 mile as a walkable distance in studies they have  conducted. Other studies in this country and internationally have used one mile or one kilometer (.62  miles) as walkable distances.     Assumptions  1. Proximity equates to access. This means that the presence of a recreational facility within a  specific distance indicates that facility is accessible from a location. “Accessibility” in this analysis  does not refer specifically to ADA accessibility.  2. General access equates to proximity of 1 mile, a reasonable distance for a drive in a car.  3. Walkable access equates to proximity of 1/2 mile, a reasonable distance attainable in 15  minutes walking at a leisurely pace.    Level of Service Analysis  Maps and data quantifications produced using the GRASP® methodology are known as perspectives.  Each perspective is a model of how service is being provided across the study area. The model can be  further analyzed to derive statistical information about service in a variety of ways. Maps are utilized  along with tables and charts to provide benchmarks a community may use to determine its success in  providing services.     The score of any component is reflected at any point within a catchment area that surrounds it. As  illustrated in Figure 12, these areas are overlapped and used to calculate a total GRASP® Level of Service  score for any given point within the study area, in this case the City of Meridian. When service areas for  multiple components are plotted on a map, a picture emerges that represents the cumulative level of  service provided by that set of components in a geographic area. This process yields the data used to  create all perspective maps and analytical charts. The graphic below illustrates the process assuming all  three components and the park boundary itself, and thus all catchments, are scored a “2.”    Figure 13: GRASP® Catchment and Scoring Example                                          Parks and Recreation Master Plan 53 A basic algorithm is used to calculate scoring totals for every park and indoor facility in the inventory  and is illustrated in Figure 13.    Figure 14: GRASP® Scoring Calculation    Perspective maps and charts are produced by applying the GRASP® process to the City of Meridian  inventory. Shown on a heat map, cumulative GRASP® scoring for any part of the study area is  represented by darker or lighter shades for higher/lower scores, respectively.     GRASP® recognizes that every agency is unique and should be measured on its own standards. This  same data can also be used to portray areas that meet or do not meet a minimum standard,  represented by different colors. A threshold map displays the data related to a minimum standard  GRASP® score, called a threshold. A threshold score is normally set by the score of a typical  “neighborhood” park within a recreation system but may also be set using a median score, average  score, or some other statistical indicator. Based on the consistency in “Neighborhood Parks” in  Meridian, a typical neighborhood park equivalent was used in determining the threshold. See Appendix  C: GRASP® Inventory Compilation and Scoring Process for in‐depth discussion on threshold calculation.       Darker and lighter orange shades on a heat map show areas with higher or lower level of service respectively. Also shown are  outdoor locations, indoor locations, and city infrastructure.    •Each component receives a score 1 , 2, or 3 •Site modifiers are added up to determine a multiplier 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 •"Design & Ambiance" as a stand alone modifer 1, 2, or 3 •All modified component scores add up to a total score for a park or indoor facility 79.2   54 City of Meridian, Idaho   Purple, yellow, and grey shades on a threshold map show areas that meet the minimum standard, fall below the minimum  standard, or have no level of service respectively.     The illustrations above show two common types of perspective maps‐‐the heat map and the threshold  map. On a heat map, a darker orange shade results from the overlap of more service areas or areas  served by higher quality components. For any given spot on a perspective map there is a GRASP® Level  of Service score that reflects cumulative scoring for nearby assets. This perspective shows generally  those areas with access to more or better recreation opportunities. The threshold map shows the same  data as compared to a minimum standard GRASP® score.    The following sections will discuss the inventory, analysis, and findings from the City of Meridian  GRASP® Level of Service Analysis.    C. GRASP® Analysis  The GRASP® Methodology involves the overlap of mapping, scoring, demographics, and interpretation  of the resulting perspectives to yield a picture of recreational service in a study area. Efforts undertaken  for the City of Meridian analysis are described in full detail below. Findings and recommendations are  summarized in the following section.    Neighborhood Access to All Recreation   The Level of Service analysis indicates neighborhood access to recreation in the City of Meridian by any  means of transportation within a 1‐ mile radius with a premium for 1/2 mile walkability and is  represented in Map Series B.     Map B‐1 shows level of service provided by the City of Meridian and Alternative Providers as unique  services. Service provided by the City of Meridian is represented in an orange gradient, and service  provided by alternative providers in blue gradient. The threshold map, shown in Map B‐5, displays  GRASP® scoring based on a minimum standard GRASP® score, the threshold. Values at or above the  threshold are displayed as purple, while values below the given threshold are yellow. The analysis in  Map B‐5 does not distinguish between ownership and includes all recreation opportunities available to  users. A series of analysis iterations (Maps B‐2 through B‐4) are developed that show levels of service  and threshold analysis based on City of Meridian provision and alternative provider provision.     Parks and Recreation Master Plan 55 Further discussion and Maps B‐2 ‐ B‐4 may be found in Appendix C: GRASP® Analysis Progression Series  and Discussion.      The heat map, shown in Map B‐1 suggests that the study area has good distribution of facilities and  good general access to parks and recreation facilities. In Map B‐5, areas displayed in purple can be  thought of as having adequate level of service. Areas in yellow indicate that service is below threshold.  Residents living in areas of dark gray are within the City of Meridian limits but must travel further than  one mile to access recreation.     Map B‐1: Neighborhood Access to All Recreation in the City of Meridian is displayed here as a heat map, with service from City  facilities shown distinct from those of alternative providers.      56 City of Meridian, Idaho   Map B‐5: Neighborhood Access to All Recreation in the City of Meridian is displayed here as a threshold map, with service from  all providers analyzed together.    Chart 1 shows statistics for general access to recreation (mapped in Map B‐5) as compared to the  threshold value based on land in the City of Meridian. It shows the percentages of the city limits that  either have no service, fall below this threshold value, or exceed this threshold. While 98 percent of the  City has access to some recreation, over 3/4 of that land is above threshold. This is a good indication  that where service is provided, it is at a high level.      Parks and Recreation Master Plan 57   Chart 1: Access to all Recreation Pie Chart    Walkable Access to Recreation  Walkability is a measure of how user‐friendly an area is to people travelling on foot. A walkable  environment has benefits with regard to public health, the local economy, and quality of life. Many  factors influence walkability and include the presence or absence and quality of footpaths, sidewalks or  other pedestrian rights‐of‐way, traffic and road conditions, land use patterns, and safety considerations  among others. Perhaps the most significant factors affecting walkability in a study area are barriers.      Barriers are typically major streets and highways, waterways, or railroad tracks that restrict pedestrian  or bicycle movement and pose a potential risk to public safety. Barriers were determined for the City of  Meridian and used to “clip” the service coverage for the walkable level of service perspective analysis.  This accounts for these obstacles as deterrents to active transportation that serves to limit access to  recreation.     The Walkable Level of Service perspective models access to recreation using a 1/2 mile catchment  distance exclusively. This represents a convenient distance to access recreation on foot or by bike and  can be achieved by an average person within a 15‐minute walk. This analysis does not recognize any  service across a barrier.     The walkability heat map in Map C‐1 shows access to recreation in the City of Meridian by walking or  other non‐motorized travel mode. The effect of the barriers is notable in this perspective map. Map C‐5  displays GRASP® scoring based on the same threshold used in Map Series B. A series of analysis  iterations (Maps C‐2 through C‐4) have been developed that show levels of service and threshold  analysis based on City of Meridian provision and alternative provider provision. Further discussion may  be found in Appendix C: GRASP® Analysis Progression Series and Discussion.            58 City of Meridian, Idaho   Map C‐1: Walkable Access to Recreation in the City of Meridian is displayed here as a heat map, with service from City facilities  shown distinct from those of alternative providers.    Map C‐5, shows the combined threshold analysis for walkability with no distinction as to ownership. This  perspective map shows significant portions of the City at or above the threshold in walkability but also  reveals many areas that fall below threshold and with no service. This analysis indicates that while  overall Meridian may not be a very walk‐friendly city, there are areas, subdivisions, and neighborhoods  that could be considered very walkable.    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 59     Map C‐5: This threshold map shows Walkable Access to all recreation in the City of Meridian based on all providers. A minimum  standard GRASP® score is again used in this perspective to show service above or below threshold from any provider.     Chart 2, shows statistics for walkable access to recreation (as mapped in Map C‐5) applying a threshold.  Based on land area in the City of Meridian. While 81 percent of the City that has walkable access, only  24 percent of total City acres meet threshold, and 57 percent falls below the threshold value. A total of  19 percent of the City is without walkable service within 1/2 mile.     Chart 2: Walkability of City of Meridian by land area      60 City of Meridian, Idaho While Chart 2, above, refers to the percentage of the City within walking distance of service, it does not  tell the whole story. When discussing walkability, it is very important to understand the proximity of  parks to population centers. Using the ESRI population database, the percentage of the actual Meridian  population can also be determined within the three service levels: at or above threshold, below  threshold, and no service. The results of this further analysis are shown in Chart 3, below, which  indicates that nearly 75 percent of the Meridian population has walkable access to recreation with half  of the population at or above threshold. This would indicate that parks are generally well placed in  relation to population areas.      Chart 3: Walkability of City of Meridian by Population    This population analysis can also be broken down further to look at specific portions of the population.  Chart 4 shows that 77 percent of youth (ages 19 and under) live within walking distance of recreation  opportunities that were included in this study, further indication that recreation is well located to serve  the Meridian population.      Chart 4: Youth Walkable Access to Recreation    25% 25% 50% % of Total  2014 Population No Service Below Threshold At or Above Threshold 24% 24% 52% % of Population Ages 19 and Under No Service Below Threshold At or Above Threshold   Parks and Recreation Master Plan 61 A Note on Utilizing the GRASP® Perspectives  GRASP® perspectives provide a snapshot to benchmark future planning efforts, but it should be noted  that these analyses need to be considered along with other indicators. Used in conjunction with other  needs assessment tools (such as needs surveys and a public process), GRASP® perspectives can be used  to determine if current levels of service are appropriate in a given location. However, it is not necessarily  beneficial for all parts of the community to score equally in the analyses. The desired level of service for  any particular location will depend on the type of service being analyzed and land use or demographic  characteristics of the particular location. Commercial, institutional, and industrial areas might  reasonably be expected to have lower levels of service for parks and recreation opportunities than  residential areas, for example. All such factors must be accounted for in order to make well informed  management decisions.    Access to Pathways  In Meridian, as in many cities across the country, pathways are recognized as valuable and desirable  components to any recreation system. The following map, Map D, shows existing pathways in Meridian,  as well as planned or proposed pathways. Meridian residents have access to a number of different types  of pathway providers: those pathways provided by the City of Meridian, other public providers such as  WARD Parks, and semi‐public providers such as Homeowner Associations. Perceived public access may  vary greatly based on some of the more restrictive neighborhood pathways. While there are a variety of  opportunities to access pathways across the City, public input from this study indicates that expanded  access and additional opportunities are needed.     As a pathway system matures, the need emerges to address barriers, such as roadways, waterways, and  railroad crossings that separate distinct pathway networks in order to create a truly connected pathway  system. A pathway network is a part of a pathway system within which major barrier crossings have  been addressed and all pathways are connected. Pathway networks within a pathway system are  typically separated from each other by such barriers or by missing pathway connections. Signaled  crosswalks, pedestrian underpasses, and bridges can be used to help users navigate barriers. New  pathways may be added to link trail networks and improve overall connectivity. Most communities have  several pathway networks that connect users to common destinations such as schools, shops,  restaurants, and civic and religious institutions in addition to parks and recreation facilities. The more  integrated these networks, the more connected a community.     In response to public input regarding the need for a connected pathway and pathway system, a basic  analysis is used in this mapping (Map D) that display longer segments of existing pathways in a darker  shade of red. Shorter segments tend towards a light orange shade in this analysis.    Pathways also serve as access to other recreation opportunities. A complete discussion of “Recreational  Connectivity can be found later in this document.        62 City of Meridian, Idaho   Map D: This map shows current, planned, and proposed pathways in the City of Meridian     GRASP® Comparative Data  The GRASP® Index, or the overall GRASP® value per capita, for the City of Meridian is 18. Because  every community is unique, there are no standard or “correct” numbers for these. However, it is useful  to note that the GRASP® Index for the City of Meridian falls within the mid‐range. Table 7 provides  comparative data from other communities. For reference, statistics have been included for other  communities of similar size in addition to smaller and larger communities across the country. It is  notable that the GRASP® Index score for Meridian is similar or higher than most other cities listed with  population in the 90,000 to 116,000 range. Meridian also has one of the higher “average number of  components per site” and “average score per site” if compared to other cities. These are prime  indicators of the well‐developed Neighborhood and Community Parks in Meridian vs. other  communities. Additionally, the average level of service per acre served and percentage of area with level  of service are the highest of other cities of similar size. Finally, the Meridian statistics include currently  undeveloped park lands that once developed will further increase the overall level of service value.   Ta b l e  7:  GR A S P ®  Co m p a r a t i v e  Da t a     ST A T E C I T Y Y E A R P O P U L A T I O N ST U D Y  AR E A  SI Z E   (A C R E S ) # OF  SI T E S  (P A R K S ,   FA C I L I T I E S ,  ET C ) TO T A L  # OF   CO M P O N E N T S AV G .  #  CO M P O N E N T S  PE R   SI T E TO T A L  GR A S P ®   VA L U E  (E N T I R E   SY S T E M )   GR A S P ®  IN D E X A V G .  SC O R E / S I T E % of  TOTAL  AREA  w/LOS  >0AVG. LOS  PER  ACRE  SERVEDNUMBER OF  COMPONENTS  PER  POPULATIONAVERAGE LOS/POP  DEN  PER  ACREPOPULATION DENSITY  (PER  ACRE) VT E s s e x 2 0 1 1 2 8 , 8 5 8 2 5 , 2 3 0 4 7 1 5 3 3 . 3 8 9 5 3 1 1 9 . 0 7 2 % 1 1 . 0 5 1 0 1 . 1 ID P o s t  Fa l l s 2 0 1 1 29 , 0 6 2 2 4 , 9 2 8 35 2 7 1 7 . 7 1 0 0 5 3 5 2 8 . 7 7 1 % 1 6 9 9 1 4 5 1 . 2 OR O r e g o n  Ci t y 2 0 0 6 2 9 , 5 4 0 5 , 9 4 4 5 1 2 1 5 4 . 2 N A N A N A 8 6 % 4 5 7 9 5 . 0 CO C o m m e r c e  Ci t y 2 0 0 6 3 6 , 0 4 9 2 6 , 2 7 0 9 0 3 5 7 4 . 0 1 0 4 7 2 9 . 0 1 1 . 6 7 3 % 1 1 3 1 0 8 2 1 . 4 CA L a  Qu i n t a 2 0 0 6 3 9 , 6 1 4 2 2 , 8 2 9 2 7 1 4 3 5 . 3 6 1 1 1 5 2 2 . 6 7 9 % 78.0 44 5 1 . 7 UT S o u t h  Jo r d a n 2 0 0 6 4 4 , 2 7 6 1 4 , 0 8 1 4 8 1 7 2 3 . 6 1 5 7 8 3 6 3 2 . 9 4 4 % 2 9 . 8 4 9 3 . 1 CA P a l m  Sp r i n g s 2 0 1 3 4 4 , 4 6 8 6 0 , 4 4 2 1 6 1 6 2 1 0 . 1 1 1 4 9 2 6 7 1 . 8 6 9 % 164.9 42 2 3 0 . 7 NM F a r m i n g t o n 2 0 1 4 4 6 , 8 1 5 21 , 1 7 9 98 3 5 4 3 . 6 2 2 0 4 4 8 2 2 . 5 9 7 % 2 2 3 8 1 0 1 2 . 2 OR C o r v a l l i s 2 0 1 1 54 , 4 6 2 1 8 , 0 0 6 54 3 0 9 5 . 7 2 2 1 7 4 1 4 1 . 1 9 3 % 2 8 9 6 9 6 3 . 0 MO L i b e r t y 2 0 1 3 5 6 , 0 4 1 53 , 1 6 1 39 2 9 8 7 . 6 6 0 7 1 1 1 5 . 6 5 7 % 1 0 7 5 1 0 2 1 . 1 MA B r o o k l i n e 2 0 0 9 6 0 , 0 0 0 N A 7 4 1 2 8 1 . 7 5 5 1 9 7 . 4 N A N A 2 N A N A ID M e r i d i a n 2 0 1 5 9 4 , 2 8 9 18 , 1 5 9 21 * 2 0 7 * 9 . 9 * 1 9 4 7 1 8 5 2 . 1 9 8 % 1 9 6 2 3 7 . 8 5 . 2 FL W i n t e r  Ha v e n 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 4 2 , 1 9 1 3 1 2 3 0 7 . 4 3 2 8 3 1 0 . 6 3 7 % 1 7 5 2 7 3 . 8 2 . 4 TX P e a r l a n d 2 0 1 5 1 0 1 , 9 0 0 30 , 4 6 8 21 1 6 4 7 . 8 1 5 5 6 1 5 7 4 . 1 8 5 % 1 6 2 2 5 5 . 4 2 . 9 OR N o r t h  Cl a c k a m a s 2 0 1 2 1 1 5 , 9 2 4 23 , 0 4 0 93 2 9 5 3 . 2 2 2 0 7 1 9 2 3 . 7 9 7 1 8 3 3 3 6 . 4 5 . 0 CO F o r t  Co l l i n s 1 3 0 , 6 8 1 3 3 , 3 8 8 4 5 6 1 9 1 3 . 8 2 6 7 5 2 0 5 9 . 4 8 3 % 2 1 7 5 5 5 . 4 3 . 9 NC C a r y 2 0 1 1 1 3 9 , 3 8 2 35 , 5 7 8 43 5 6 2 1 3 . 1 2 8 4 3 2 0 6 6 . 1 9 7 % 2 2 1 4 5 6 . 4 3 . 9 IA C e d a r  Ra p i d s 1 4 3 , 7 8 8 4 5 , 9 8 7 9 8 7 5 9 7 . 7 2 4 6 7 1 7 2 5 . 2 8 6 % 3 0 0 5 9 5 . 8 3 . 1 CO L a k e w o o d 1 4 4 , 3 6 9 2 7 , 4 9 4 1 0 5 7 3 8 7 . 0 6 4 7 6 4 5 6 1 . 7 1 0 0 N A 5 5 . 3 IN S o u t h  Be n d 2 0 1 1 1 6 4 , 3 9 6 65 , 3 8 7 64 3 3 9 5 . 3 2 4 1 7 1 5 3 7 . 8 7 2 % 1 3 0 2 5 1 . 7 2 . 5 FL F t  La u d e r d a l e 1 8 1 , 0 9 5 2 3 , 2 3 0 9 1 4 8 3 5 . 3 2 6 6 2 1 5 2 9 . 3 9 8 2 2 1 3 2 8 . 4 7 . 8 VA A r l i n g t o n 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 N A 2 2 5 4 9 4 2 . 2 N A N A N A N A N A 3 WA T a c o m a 2 0 3 , 9 8 4 3 4 , 1 3 3 1 0 4 4 8 8 4 . 7 N A N A N A N A N A 2 6 . 0 OR T H P R D 2 0 1 2 2 2 4 , 6 2 7 2 9 , 0 9 7 2 5 3 1 2 1 1 5 6 8 4 3 3 0 2 7 1 0 0 % 4 8 9 5 6 3 7 . 7 *I n c l u d e s  Ci t y  of  Me r i d i a n  as s e t s  an d  fa c i l i t i e s  on l y   Parks and Recreation Master Plan 65 D. Other Types of Analysis  Capacities Analysis  One of the traditional tools for evaluating service for parks and recreation is capacity analysis. This  analysis compares the total acres and quantity of assets to current and future population. Table 8 shows  the current capacities for all park land and selected components in the City of Meridian. Along with  community and staff input, this information can be used to project future needs to accommodate  population growth.    Based on projected population growth in Meridian and current ratio of component to that population,  the City of Meridian and/or other providers would need to add 130 acres of park land by 2020 to  maintain the current level of service. This could be a single 130 acre park or multiple parks. Other  projected needs include: (4) ball fields, (7) multi‐purpose fields, (3) tennis courts, (5) picnic shelters, (6)  basketball courts, (7) loop walks, (3) horseshoe pits, (8) open turf areas, (1) volleyball court, and (12)  playgrounds for example. These could be part of new parks or schools or added to existing parks.     Table 8: Capacities LOS for Community Components Meridian, Idaho Jun-15 20 1 5 G I S A c r e s Aq u a t i c F e a t u r e , Sp r a y Ba l l f i e l d Ba s k e t b a l l Di s c G o l f Ho r s e s h o e s Lo o p W a l k MP F i e l d , a l l s i z e s Op e n T u r f Pl a y g r o u n d , a l l si z e s Sh e l t e r s , A l l S i z e s Te n n i s Vo l l e y b a l l INVENTORY City of Meridian+ 249.4 2 12 11 2 19 20 18 9 13 25 10 1 Schools 515.7 0 5 20 0 0 22 27 32 26 3 6 1 Identified Alternative Providers* 87 0 10 8 1 0 3 2 9 37 6 1 2 Total 852.1 2 27 39 3 19 45 47 50 76 34 17 4 CURRENT RATIO PER POPULATION CURRENT POPULATION 2015 94,289 Current Ratio per 1000 Population 9.04 0.02 0.29 0.41 0.03 0.20 0.48 0.50 0.53 0.81 0.36 0.18 0.04 Population per component 111 47,145 3,492 2,418 31,430 4,963 2,095 2,006 1,886 1,241 2,773 5,546 23,572 PROJECTED POPULATION - 2020 108,701 Total # needed to maintain current ratio of all existing facilities at projected population 982 2 31 45 3 22 52 54 58 88 39 20 5 Number that should be added by all providers to achieve current ratio at projected population 130 0 4 6 0 3 7 7 8 12 5 3 1 *Incomplete data available on all alternative provider park boundaries; +Only includes currently developed or planned and funded Meridian Parks. Does not include future parks or golf course Capacities LOS for Community Components   66 City of Meridian, Idaho GRASP® Index for Specific Components  A capacities analysis is based purely on the  quantity of assets without regard to quality or  functionality. Higher LOS is achieved only by  adding assets, regardless of the condition or  quality of those assets. In theory, service  provided by assets should be based on their  quality as well as their quantity. An example  will help illustrate.    In the case of Meridian, playgrounds currently  score at 125 and have a GRASP® Index of 1.3.  Based on population projections by the year  2020, Meridian and its partners would need to  provide an additional 19.1 points worth of  GRASP® scoring through playgrounds to  maintain the current level of service per capita.  Increases in GRASP® score can occur through  upgrades to current components, addition of  new components, or a combination of upgrades  and additions. For reference, a typical  component located in a typical park with typical  comfort and convenience modifiers equates to  a GRASP® score of 4.8 points.     This is especially useful in communities where  the sustainability of the parks and recreation  system over time is important. In the past, the  focus was on maintaining adequate capacity as population growth occurred. Today, many communities  are reaching build‐out while others have seen population growth slow. The focus in such communities  has shifted to maintaining current levels of service as components age or become obsolete, or as needs  change. The GRASP® Index can be used to track LOS under such conditions over time.    Table 9 shows the GRASP® Indices for the various components based on the 2015 population.     The authors of this report have developed a tool  that incorporates both quantity and quality for  any given set of assets into a single indicator  called the GRASP® Index. This index is a per  capita ratio of the functional score per  population in thousands.     The GRASP® Index can move up or down over  time as either quantity or quality changes. For  example, if all of the playgrounds in a  community are allowed to deteriorate over  time, but none are added or taken away, the  LOS provided by the playgrounds is decreasing.     Similarly, if all of the playgrounds are replaced  with new and better ones, but no additional  playgrounds are added, the LOS increases even  though the per‐capita quantity of playgrounds  did not change.     GRASP® score for any component is also directly  impacted by the Design & Ambiance score, as  well as comfort and convenience modifiers of  any given park. Improvements or upgrades to  these park features will also impact the scoring.    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 67 Table 9: GRASP® Community Component Index    Projected Community Components  GRASP® Index 2020 Current  Population  2015 94,289 Projected  Population  2020 108,701 Total   GRASP®  Community  Score per  component  type GRASP®  score per  1000  population (GRASP®  Index) Total   GRASP®  score  needed at  projected  population Additional   GRASP®  score  needed Aquatic Feature,  Spray 18.6 0.2 21.4 2.8 Ballfield 106.5 1.1 122.8 16.3 Basketball 88.5 0.9 102.0 13.5 Community Gardens 11.7 0.1 13.5 1.8 Horseshoes 180.0 1.9 207.5 27.5 Loop Walks 80.4 0.9 92.7 12.3 MP  Field, all sizes 131.5 1.4 151.6 20.1 Open Turf 75.5 0.8 87.0 11.5 Passive  Nodes 74.6 0.8 86.0 11.4 Playground, all sizes 125.0 1.3 144.1 19.1 Public Art 44.7 0.5 51.5 6.8 Shelter, all sizes 189.6 2.0 218.6 29.0 Tennis 137.6 1.5 158.6 21.0   68 City of Meridian, Idaho E. Summary of Findings  Several general findings were revealed by the City of Meridian GRASP® Analysis. These may be  summarized as follows:    For neighborhood access to parks and recreation, Meridian offers:   A wide variety of well distributed recreational opportunities.   High quality and well maintained parks.   Good access with over 75 percent of land area above threshold when considering all providers.   Definite distinction between “Community Parks” and “Neighborhood Parks.”   An overall high level of service if accessed by an automobile.   High scoring “Regional Parks” or “Community Parks.”   A high number of components and average score per site when compared to some other  communities.   Some large “pockets” of high level of service.   Great restroom standards.    For walkable level of service:   While “Neighborhood Parks” often score high enough to meet the “threshold,” a lack of  pathway access often keeps an area below the threshold mark.   Some parks, especially “Neighborhood Parks,” lack unique or identifiable character.   Alternative providers are an important supplement to Meridian’s “Neighborhood” level of  service.   There is heavy reliance on alternative providers (including schools) for walkable neighborhood  level of service in many areas, and the quality of alternative providers’ parks vary greatly across  the system.   Demographic analysis shows good distribution of parks where young people live with over 75  percent of 0‐19 age group having walkable access to some recreation service.   There is a need to identify and collect inventory data on the remaining alternative provider  parks/facilities.   Access to a quality, connected pathway system is limited and greatly impacts overall walkable  level of service in Meridian.    For pathways and pathway access:   There a variety of pathways are available across the City, but they are not meeting the needs  and demands of the community.    Many of the pathways within Meridian are not connected to the larger overall pathway system.   A significant portion of these pathways may have limited or restricted access based on locations  within subdivisions.   Pathway access is notably absent from some Meridian residential neighborhoods.    Based on projected population growth over the next 5‐7 years, Meridian and its partners need:   Additional park land and components added to the system to maintain current level of service.   To improve or upgrade existing components to maintain current level of service.      Parks and Recreation Master Plan 69 Preliminary Recommendations   Improve recreational connectivity through neighborhood pathway connections and park  “spurs.”   Continue to improve level of service especially at “Neighborhood” Parks through upgrades or  additional components if pathways cannot be added.   Work with neighborhoods to create an individual identity for each neighborhood park.   Work with alternative providers to increase level of service in areas Meridian doesn’t have  neighborhood parks but level of service is low.   Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks.    F. Park Classifications  The Nature of Classification Systems   Park classification systems are commonly utilized by park and recreation agencies. Most park and  recreation agencies organize lands and facilities into various classes, types, categories, or other schemes  as a planning and management tool. However, once established, classification schemes are rarely  modified and over time may lose effectiveness as a tool, due to changing values of an agency or a  community. Purposes for classifying lands and facilities into different categories include:    Determination of policies and strategies for management and operation of lands and facilities.   Definition of categories of need for land and facilities and identifying potential acquisitions to  meet those needs.   Establishment of policies and strategies for land acquisition, including exactions, easements,  leases, and other strategies, in addition to fee‐simple purchase.   Establishment of benchmarks and goals for providing services and measure the results of efforts  towards meeting these.    In 1995, the National Park and Recreation Association published the following classification table. At the  time it represented the most recent thinking on classification and standards for parklands and facilities.  NRPA has since moved in the direction of GIS mapping of Park and Recreation Lands, The GRASP®  methodology is one example of a GIS driven, component‐based system that may be used for both  classification and level of service analysis.    70 City of Meridian, Idaho Based on a modified 1995 NRPA Classification System the Meridian Park System would breakdown as  follows:    Regional Park  Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park  Settlers Park  Community Park Bear Creek Park  Heroes Park  Storey Park  Tully Park  Neighborhood Park 8th Street Park  Champion Park  Chateau Park  Gordon Harris Park  Renaissance Park  Seasons Park  Mini‐Park Centennial Park  Cox Monument  Fire Station No.4 Park    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 71 Special Use Park Lakeview Golf Course  City Hall Plaza  Generations Plaza  Heritage Ball Fields  Jabil Fields  Undeveloped/Future Park Lands Borup/Bottles Properties  South Meridian Property  William Watson  Private Park/Recreation Facility HOA (Various Other Parks)  Natural Resource Areas U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Undeveloped  School‐Park Andrus Elementary School  Barbara Morgan Stem Academy  Chaparral Elementary School  Chief Joseph Elementary School  Christine Donnell School of the Arts  Crossroads Middle School  Desert Sage Elementary School  Discovery Elementary School  Gateway School  Heritage Middle School  Hunter Elementary School  Joplin Elementary School  Lake Hazel Elementary School  Lake Hazel Middle School  Lewis & Clark Middle School  Lowell Scott Middle School  Mary McPherson Elementary School  Meridian Elementary School  Meridian Middle School  Paramount Elementary School  Pathways Middle School  Pepper Ridge Elementary School  Peregrine Elementary School  Pioneer School of the Arts  Ponderosa Elementary School  Prospect Elementary School  River Valley Elementary School  Sawtooth Middle School  Siena Elementary School  Silver Sage Elementary School  Spalding STEM Academy  Summerwind Elementary School  Ustick Elementary School  Willow Creek Elementary     72 City of Meridian, Idaho Other Public or Semi‐Public  Providers  C.F. McDevitt Park  Cameron Park  Cottonwood Park  Fuller Park  Meridian Swimming Pool  Peppermint Park  Settlers Village Park  Sycamore Park    A good classification system should address such a variety of purposes in ordering park facilities.  Classifications must be clear, straightforward, and understandable, especially to agency administrators  and staff. Often classification systems are adopted that are ambiguous or use conflicting criteria for  defining individual classes of lands and facilities. One example might be a classification system based on  both parcel size and uses that occur within a parcel.     Planners and administrators often try to do too many things at once within a single scheme. A common  failing of classification systems is that they tend to be used based on parcel size rather than a land use  basis. Often, a large parcel is owned within which a wide and diverse set of uses is contained, and there  is no single classification that encompasses the full range of purposes that the parcel addresses. So a  classification is chosen from among the possible choices, but it is not able to describe all of the functions  of that parcel. A common alternative is to develop a new classification that fits the parcel, but over time,  this leads to too many classifications and becomes unwieldy and less useful for its original purposes.     Consider a site that is located in a residential area on 20 or 30 acres that is part wooded area and part  developed park, with a playground intended for use by the neighborhood but not much else. This site  would be classified a neighborhood park based on use, but a community park based on size. An  exception must be made to the standard in order to assign it to one classification or the other.     That same park might have a large lawn area that is used for soccer games. The combination of size and  use would place it in the community park category, but everyone considers it a neighborhood park  because of where it is located and the people it serves. Another exception is made to the standard. Or a  new classification is created to address the unique situation. Over time, other unique situations occur,  and before long there are too many classifications and/or exceptions and classification system becomes  unwieldy. The ambiguity and number of exceptions that the classification scheme creates degrades its  effectiveness as a planning tool. Ultimately such a scheme comes to be seen as arbitrary as it is not  defensible as a means of justifying decisions.     Classifications are of relatively little importance to the general public. A visitor chooses to visit a  particular park or facility for the amenities it contains, not based on its classification. A park name that  includes its classification, such as Meridian Community Park, may suggest to the potential visitor what  amenities it contains, but the choice to visit is still based on the amenities that are actually found there  regardless of name or classification. Classifications are most valuable for internal use by an agency.            Parks and Recreation Master Plan 73 Use‐ or Function‐Based Level‐of‐Service Classification  Another useful classification system is applied on a land‐use basis rather than a parcel basis. To do this,  first list the various types of uses found within the agency’s lands and facilities. Sort these into helpful  categories that have relevance to the planning, operation, and management of the assets. For example,  if sports oriented parks are to be managed differently than neighborhood parks, a clear and  understandable definition of what uses constitute a neighborhood park should be developed.   Once the use categories are defined, all of the land and facilities owned and managed by an agency  should be evaluated to identify which parts of them fall within each of the various classifications. This  should be done on a use basis rather than a parcel basis. This means that a sports oriented park may be  defined by boundaries that reflect the use, and these boundaries may not necessarily coincide with  parcel boundaries (though often they will).These boundaries can be drawn in a GIS system and stored on  separate layers from the parcel boundaries. By creating a new layer in the GIS with classifications based  on use or functions, the classification system can be used more effectively to measure and manage the  assets of the agency.    Component‐Based Level‐of‐Service Classification  In general, the current Meridian Park Classification System appears to work well with the current  inventory. Parks or facilities within each classification fall within reasonable ranges for acres and  quantity of GRASP® components. A classification system that combines the current system with the  GRASP® component based system would mean only a minor adjustment to this system. The following  table characterizes the proposed classification system and offers general description and proposed  GRASP® ranges based on current conditions. In this system, the primary focus or intended function of  the park or facility dictates the GRASP® level of service.                                         THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK       Pr o p o s e d  Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n P r o p o s e d  Ge n e r a l  De s c r i p t i o n Ge n e r a l  De s i g n  an d  De v e l o p m e n t   Gu i d e l i n e s Si z e  an d  St r e e t  Fr o n t a g e  Gu i d e l i n e s Pr o p o s e d  Un i q u e   GR A S P ®  Co m p o n e n t   Ra n g e  ba s e d  on   Cu r r e n t  In v e n t o r y Pr o p o s e d  To t a l  GR A S P ®   Co m p o n e n t  Ra n g e  ba s e d  on   Cu r r e n t  In v e n t o r y Sp o r t s  Pa r k S p o r t  or i e n t e d  fa c i l i t y . Ap p r o p r i a t e  co m p o n e n t s  ma y  va r y  ba s e d   on  us e .   Ty p i c a l  Co m f o r t  an d  Co n v e n i e n c e   Am e n i t i e s  (P i c n i c  ta b l e s ,  be n c h e s ,  bi k e   ra c k s ,  dr i n k i n g  fo u n t a i n s ,  re s t r o o m ,  et c ) Va r i e s  by  us e St r e e t  fr o n t a g e  my  va r y  by  us e  an d  si z e Va r i e s V a r i e s Sp e c i a l  Us e  Pa r k Co v e r s  a  br o a d  ra n g e  of  pa r k s  an d   re c r e a t i o n a l  fa c i l i t i e s  or i e n t e d  to w a r d   si n g l e ‐pu r p o s e  us e ,  li m i t e d ,  is o l a t e d  or   un i q u e  re c r e a t i o n a l  ne e d s . Ap p r o p r i a t e  co m p o n e n t s  ma y  va r y  ba s e d   on  us e .   Ty p i c a l  Co m f o r t  an d  Co n v e n i e n c e   Am e n i t i e s  (P i c n i c  ta b l e s ,  be n c h e s ,  bi k e   ra c k s ,  dr i n k i n g  fo u n t a i n s ,  re s t r o o m ,  et c ) Va r i e s  by  us e St r e e t  fr o n t a g e  my  va r y  by  us e  an d  si z e Va r i e s V a r i e s 15  to  30  ac r e s  ba s e d  on  cu r r e n t  in v e n t o r y Vi s i b l e  fr o m  ad j o i n i n g  st r e e t  an d  st r e e t   fr o n t a g e  on  at  le a s t  tw o  si d e s  wi t h  40 0   fe e t  mi n i m u m 7  to  98  to  15 Ne i g h b o r h o o d  Pa r k Th e  ba s i c  un i t  of  th e  pa r k  sy s t e m  an d   se r v e s  as  th e  re c r e a t i o n a l  an d  so c i a l   fo c u s  of  th e  ne i g h b o r h o o d .    Le v e l  of   se r v i c e  is  pr i m a r i l y  pr o v i d e d  to   i n d i v i d u a l ,  fa m i l i e s  an d  sm a l l  gr o u p s   th r o u g h  un i q u e  co m p o n e n t s .    Ge n e r a l l y   se r v e s  re s i d e n t s  wi t h i n  1/ 2  mi l e  wa l k i n g   di s t a n c e  up  to  on e  mi l e  an d  li m i t e d  on ‐si t e   pa r k i n g  pr o v i d e d . Ap p r o p r i a t e  co m p o n e n t s  ma y  in c l u d e  bu t   no t  be  li m i t e d  to :   Lo c a l  Pl a y g r o u n d Op e n  Tu r f Sh e l t e r Ba s k e t b a l l  or  Ot h e r  Co u r t  Ga m e Lo o p  Wa l k Pu b l i c  Ar t   Ty p i c a l  Co m f o r t  an d  Co n v e n i e n c e   Am e n i t i e s  (P i c n i c  ta b l e s ,  be n c h e s ,  bi k e   ra c k s ,  dr i n k i n g  fo u n t a i n s ,  re s t r o o m ,  et c ) .5  to  11  ac r e s  ba s e d  on  cu r r e n t  in v e n t o r y   (C i t y  St a n d a r d  Si z e  is  7  ac r e s ) Vi s i b l e  fr o m  ad j o i n i n g  st r e e t  an d  20 0  fe e t   of  st r e e t  fr o n t a g e 5  to  64 . 5  to  6 Re g i o n a l  Pa r k  (L a r g e  Ur b a n   Pa r k ) Se r v e  a  br o a d  pu r p o s e  to  th e  c o m m u n i t y   an d  re g i o n  wh i l e  st i l l  pr o v i d i n g  ad e q u a t e   ne i g h b o r h o o d  le v e l  of  se r v i c e  to  ad j a c e n t   re s i d e n t s .  Fo c u s  is  on  co m p o n e n t s  th a t   oc c u r  in  qu a n t i t i e s ,  si z e  an d  de s i g n  to   se r v e  la r g e  gr o u p s  or  c o m m u n i t y  wi d e   ev e n t s .    Ma y  se r v e  us e r s  fr o m  ac r o s s  ci t y   or  re g i o n .  Be c a u s e  of  se r v i c e  ar e a  re q u i r e s   ad e q u a t e  pa r k i n g  fa c i l i t i e s . Ap p r o p r i a t e  co m p o n e n t s  ma y  in c l u d e  bu t   no t  be  li m i t e d  to :   De s t i n a t i o n  Pl a y g r o u n d Do g  Pa r k Sp o r t s  Fi e l d s Sp l a s h  Pa d s Ev e n t  Sp a c e Op e n  Tu r f Sh e l t e r Ba s k e t b a l l ,  Te n n i s ,  Pi c k l e b a l l ,  et c . Lo o p  Wa l k Pu b l i c  Ar t   Ty p i c a l  Co m f o r t  an d  Co n v e n i e n c e   Am e n i t i e s  (P i c n i c  ta b l e s ,  be n c h e s ,  bi k e   ra c k s ,  dr i n k i n g  fo u n t a i n s ,  re s t r o o m ,  et c ) 50 +  ac r e s  ba s e d  on  cu r r e n t  in v e n t o r y Fu l l  ac c e s s  on  at  le a s t  tw o  si d e s  of  pa r k .    At  le a s t  on e  si d e  of  th e  pa r k  sh o u l d  ha v e   ac c e s s  fr o m  a  co l l e c t o r  or  ar t e r i a l  st r e e t . 15  to  21 3 9 + Co m m u n i t y  Pa r k Se r v e  a  br o a d  pu r p o s e  to  th e  c o m m u n i t y   wh i l e  st i l l  pr o v i d i n g  ad e q u a t e   ne i g h b o r h o o d  le v e l  of  se r v i c e  to  ad j a c e n t   re s i d e n t s .  Fo c u s  is  on  co m p o n e n t s  th a t   oc c u r  in  qu a n t i t i e s ,  si z e  an d  de s i g n  to   se r v e  la r g e  gr o u p s  or  c o m m u n i t y  wi d e   ev e n t s .  Ge n e r a l l y  se r v e s  us e r s  wi t h i n  1 ‐3   mi l e  ra d i u s .  Re q u i r e s  ad e q u a t e  pa r k i n g  to   mi n i m i z e  ne i g h b o r h o o d  co n f l i c t . Ap p r o p r i a t e  co m p o n e n t s  ma y  in c l u d e  bu t   no t  be  li m i t e d  to :   De s t i n a t i o n  Pl a y g r o u n d Do g  Pa r k Sp o r t s  Fi e l d s Op e n  Tu r f Sh e l t e r Ba s k e t b a l l  or  Ot h e r  Co u r t s Lo o p  Wa l k Pu b l i c  Ar t   Ty p i c a l  Co m f o r t  an d  Co n v e n i e n c e   Am e n i t i e s  (P i c n i c  ta b l e s ,  be n c h e s ,  bi k e   ra c k s ,  dr i n k i n g  fo u n t a i n s ,  re s t r o o m ,  et c )        Ba s e d  on  ex i s t i n g  co n d i t i o n s ,  th e  cu r r e n t  pa r k s  wo u l d  fa l l  in t o  th e  fo l l o w i n g  cl a s s i f i c a t i o n s .     Pr o p o s e d  Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n L o c a t i o n Cu r r e n t  Nu m b e r  of   Un i q u e  GR A S P ®   Co m p o n e n t s Cu r r e n t  Nu m b e r  of   To t a l  GR A S P ®   Co m p o n e n t s GI S  Ac r e s Ju l i u s  M.  Kl e i n e r  Pa r k 2 1 3 9 . 5 5 7 . 9 9 2 1 Se t t l e r s  Pa r k 1 5 5 5 5 6 . 1 2 3 1 Be a r  Cr e e k  Pa r k 7 8 1 8 . 8 0 1 9 He r o e s  Pa r k 9 1 5 3 0 . 1 5 0 1 St o r e y  Pa r k 7 1 1 1 7 . 9 0 4 3 Tu l l y  Pa r k 7 9 1 8 . 4 7 7 8 8t h  St r e e t  Pa r k 3 3 2 . 7 8 2 9 Ce n t e n n i a l  Pa r k 5 4 . 5 0 . 4 5 2 0 Ch a m p i o n  Pa r k 5 5 5 . 9 8 3 0 Ch a t e a u  Pa r k 6 6 6 . 7 1 6 3 Go r d o n  Ha r r i s  Pa r k 5 5 1 1 . 1 3 7 0 Re n a i s s a n c e  Pa r k 5 5 6 . 5 2 6 4 Se a s o n s  Pa r k 6 6 6 . 9 5 3 3 Ci t y  Ha l l  Pl a z a 5 5 0 . 9 2 7 9 Co x  Mo n u m e n t 3 3 0 . 1 0 8 2 Fi r e  St a t i o n  No . 4  Pa r k 1 1 0 . 5 9 0 6 Ge n e r a t i o n s  Pl a z a 3 3 0 . 2 4 7 8 La k e v i e w  Go l f  Co u r s e 2 2 1 1 9 . 4 2 6 3 He r i t a g e  Ba l l  Fi e l d s 3 8 2 2 . 6 8 6 0 Ja b i l  Fi e l d s 1 2 8 . 3 9 8 0 Sp e c i a l  Us e  Pa r k Ne i g h b o r h o o d  Pa r k Sp o r t s  Pa r k Re g i o n a l  Pa r k  (L a r g e  Ur b a n   Pa r k ) Co m m u n i t y  Pa r k E x i s t i n g   C o n d i t i o n s           Parks and Recreation Master Plan 81 G. Urban Forestry Management Plan  Introduction    Urban Forest Overview  This chapter is intended as a  beginning to formal planning for  Meridian’s urban forest, a  summary of data, and strategic  objectives that will serve as a  springboard to more detailed  planning efforts in the future.    There are currently 5,000 trees in  255 acres of City parks, the golf  course, and other parcels of land  owned and/or maintained by the  City of Meridian. Per the  objectives of the comprehensive  plan, developed park land is expected to increase by an additional 206 acres by 2025. This translates to  an Urban Forest of around 7,000 trees.     Based on the Treasure Valley Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) Assessment (full report can be found at:  http://www.tvcanopy.net/resources/) completed in 2013, the City of Meridian has a seven percent  urban tree canopy that provides a multitude of ecosystem benefits annually to the citizens of the City,  including:   Stormwater: 8.6 million gallons, a value of $76,400 in mitigated stormwater infrastructure costs   Air Quality: 40.6 tons for a value of $513,000 in reduced adverse human health impacts   Energy Conservation: $140,400 in reduced summer cooling costs through shading of residential  homes    Urban Forest Stakeholders  Proper care of existing trees and growth of the urban forest for community benefit will involve  participation by the following stakeholders:        City of Meridian Departments   Meridian Development Corporation (MDC)  The City Partners with MDC for construction of the downtown tree planter box replacements, as  well as sharing costs for the construction of new boxes driven by new development.     Ada County Highway District (ACHD)  The City has a Memorandum of Understanding with the Ada County Highway District wherein  the city maintains the tree boxes and the trees, mitigates for sidewalk trip hazards, and shares  cost with ACHD on some sidewalk and curb repairs related to trees in public rights‐of‐way in the  downtown core geographic area.         82 City of Meridian, Idaho  West ADA School District (WASD)  The City partners with the West Ada School District each year to host an Arbor Day celebration.  Additional efforts, both present and future, will include the planting and maintenance of trees  on WASD property.       Idaho Power Company (IPC)  The City currently partners with Idaho Power Company to host the annual tree distribution  events for the Treasure Valley Shade Tree Project (http://www.tvcanopy.net/treasure‐valley‐ shade‐trees/). Trees are then planted on private property in locations determined to help  reduce future energy costs by providing shade for homes and buildings.      Idaho Department of Lands (IDL)  The Idaho Department of Lands partners with the City to host an annual Arbor Day Celebration.  They also provide grants to help fund Arbor Day Celebrations.     Treasure Valley Canopy Network (TVCN)  The City partners with the Treasure Valley Canopy Network on a number of initiatives that have  an impact on water quality, air quality, energy conservation, and overall community  enhancement through strategic investment in community infrastructure (www.tvcanopy.net).                         Others   Landscape architects and design professionals   Local nurseries   Neighborhood groups   Community volunteers and citizens   Downtown business owners   Developers who plan to build or renovate downtown     Importance of the Urban Forest to Meridian and Treasure Valley Communities  The benefits of trees to an urban environment are varied and significant. These include:   Energy savings/passive energy conservation achieved by the shading of homes and paved  surfaces   Shade, for the health, safety, and comfort of people who use parks and public areas    Mitigation of urban heat island effect   Air cleaning and purification, removal of CO2, SO2, and other airborne pollutants    Reduction of storm water runoff and soil erosion   Filtering and purification of groundwater by directly absorbing pollutants   Aesthetic enhancement and potential increased property values   Function as wind and sound breaks    Screening of unsightly urban infrastructure or for privacy   Provide valuable wildlife habitat and migration corridors                    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 83 Meridian is a Tree City USA   This is a national designation that requires participating cities to:  1. Establish a Tree Board/Commission or Urban Forestry Department  2. Enact a Tree Care Ordinance as part of the local code  3. Maintain a Community Forestry Program with an annual budget of at least $2 per capita  4. Observe Arbor Day and issue an Official Proclamation    Value that Grows with Time  Unlike other kinds of public infrastructure that require more maintenance with age and eventual  renovation or replacement, the value of a healthy tree increases over time. Considered together, the  trees that comprise the City’s urban forest are a critical community asset, the value of which is often  underrated.     Current Structure of Urban Forestry Department    Department Staff    City Arborist  The Urban Forestry Division currently has one full‐time dedicated staff member, the City Arborist, who  oversees all operations. This position was established in 2011.    Seasonal Labor  Because additional labor is needed to maintain the current standard of service, a six‐month seasonal  position was added for the first time in 2015. Eight hours per week of this staff person’s labor was  applied to the work needs of other departments.     In 2016, that need is expected to increase to one 8‐month seasonal employee.     Annual Operating Budget  Urban Forestry budget is included in the Park Department maintenance budget.   Total expenditures for 2014  $ 186,665*   Estimated expenditures for 2015  $ 195,165     *This is a comprehensive number that includes labor expense and all direct and peripheral costs  related to forestry operations.      Maintenance Overview  Meridian’s Urban Forestry Division cares for all trees in Meridian City parks, including the golf course  and street trees in the downtown core.    Forestry Department Responsibilities:   Maintenance of trees within city parks and the park system at large   This includes coordination with the Planning Department on tree mitigation for development  sites, planning for future park development, tree inventory and management, tree  maintenance, pruning cycles, new plantings, removals, replacements, fertilization, pest and  disease controls, and risk assessments.       84 City of Meridian, Idaho  Maintenance and management of the Kleiner Park arboretum   The level of maintenance required by the arboretum is higher and more specialized than  standard tree maintenance levels within the parks system at large.     Maintenance Contracts with Outside Vendors  Meridian City administers maintenance contracts for downtown street trees and selected trees on park  properties.     Outside vendors must be Certified Arborists with the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Only  Certified Arborists may perform work. Contractor must follow ANSI standards and use best management  practices. Meet other requirements by the City for outside vendors.    Annual contracted amounts vary, depending on which park or area is being pruned or added to  the budget for the coming year.    Large trees requiring specialized equipment are pruned on a five‐year cycle by contract.     Smaller trees are pruned by forestry staff on an as‐needed yearly or bi‐yearly basis, or five‐year  cycle. As a standard practice, forestry staff will raise all tree limbs for clearance over sidewalks,  pathways, and all other park areas each year as needed.    Downtown Trees/Public Rights‐of‐Way  Current care of trees within public rights‐of‐way involves cooperation between ACHD, the City of  Meridian, and the Meridian Development Corporation. Meridian Parks and Recreation bears ultimate  responsibility for management of urban street trees in the downtown core area. It is imperative that:     All agencies and organizations with jurisdiction hold to the same standards for tree planting,  care, and maintenance.   All agencies work together to set priorities for how to achieve and maintain these standards.    Challenges Specific to Downtown Trees  The following should be considered when planning for maintenance of downtown trees and other trees  in urban settings:   Tree species within the downtown are less diverse than elsewhere in park system.   Trees in the downtown tend to be shorter lived, with replacement occurring on a 10‐15 year  cycle, depending on site evaluation related to hardscape or irrigation damage by tree roots.    Drainage can be an issue within or adjacent to existing tree boxes.   Lack of existing Green Stormwater Infrastructure/Silva Cells, to help with drainage and  encourage root growth and development.    H. Strategic Goals for Meridian Urban Forestry   General Overview  To keep pace with recent growth in the area, it is important that Meridian Urban Forestry define a clear  vision for the future, as well as mechanisms for operation that will ensure a smooth transition in  anticipation of future leadership changes. The following strategic goals have been identified for the  continued health and sustainable future growth of our Meridian’s urban forest.        For more detailed objectives for each goal, along with projected timing for implementation, please refer  to the supplemental table provided in Appendix E.          Parks and Recreation Master Plan 85 1. Establish a Vision for Meridian Urban Forestry   Urban Forestry shall continue to provide a high level of service to the community by responding to  tree related calls from the public and retain its current operating model of caring for all park trees;  providing review and comment on development applications as they relate to mitigation, plantings  on City owned property and in the downtown core area; and maintaining the current tree inventory.       2. Strengthen Approach to Management of the Urban Forest  Staff will complete the ongoing GIS inventory and formalize as a comprehensive data set for use as a  management tool. Additional staff training will be required with implementation to maximize  efficiency. GIS software updates and yearly technical support is ongoing to provide what is needed  to manage urban forestry.     3. Evaluate Impacts of the Projected Park System Expansion on Urban Forestry   An understanding of the impacts of growth to maintenance of the urban forest will allow the City to  maintain its current high level of service. It is recommended that annual assessments be conducted  during the budget development process to determine needs for additional staff and equipment so  as to achieve alignment with the overall master plan.     4. Guarantee the Present and Future Health of the Urban Forest  The City Arborist will work to further the health and longevity of the urban forest through  diversification of tree species and age, anticipation of pests and other potential threats, and  implementation of standards for planting and tree selection. Staff shall also seek continuing  education on urban forestry trends, including the effects of climate change as related to forest  health.    5. Maintain and Promote the Kleiner Arboretum as a Community Asset  Develop a strategic management plan to guide future expansion, ensure adequate maintenance  resources, and create greater awareness of the arboretum within the local and regional  communities.      6. Preserve Strong Relationship with the Community/Seek Additional Opportunities for  Education and Outreach   Continue to work with the community in support of tree‐related issues, while seeking additional  opportunities to partner with other agencies, educate community members on the urban forest,  and increase awareness of its value to our community.     7. Revise City Policy as Necessary to Strengthen Urban Forestry   Periodically review and update the City ordinance to reflect changes in the field of Urban Forestry or  updates resulting from legal action in America. Updates may address changes to terms, definitions,  best practices, or other considerations, as required to stay current with the industry.       8. Continue to Offer and Develop Special Programs Related to Community Forestry  Continue to offer and develop new programs that benefit the community and increase awareness of  Urban Forestry. As programs are initiated, seek community participation first and then employ the  City budgeting process to determine staffing and funding implications.         86 City of Meridian, Idaho I. Existing Urban Forest Data   GIS Tree Inventory  A comprehensive in‐house GIS inventory by City staff of all trees maintained by the City is ongoing, with  completion expected in early 2016.     Data for each tree that will be included in this inventory:   Planting Date/Year Planted   Caliper Inches   Location   Condition Rating   Species   Cultivar   Canopy Cover   Pests, Diseases, Cultural Problems   Structural Issues   Photographs   Value Assessments   Work Order History Application to Forest Management  It is intended that the resulting complex data profile of the urban forest will function as a management  tool that can be finely tuned to the needs of the Department. Once data is fully compiled, layers can be  manipulated and various attributes selected to generate current snapshots of such parameters as tree  condition, age distribution, or pruning history. For example, see Figure 14 which shows the current tree  condition.    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 87 Figure 15: Sample Data Chart Generated in GIS Using Data from Current Tree Inventory  Beyond analysis, this information can assist trained forestry staff with:   Budget projections   Prioritization of needed improvements and maintenance   Creation of work plans   Trends and forecasting of emerging forestry issues that may threaten tree health   Generation of urban forest cost‐benefits analysis    Need for Additional Training  Due to the complexity of the GIS database, urban forestry staff will require additional training in GIS and  urban forestry‐specific software in order to achieve maximum results from manipulation of the data set.  Training should also be provided with regard to use of GIS interface devices in the field so that staff can  keep the inventory current as new trees are planted, moved, and removed.     It is recommended that any future candidates for the City Arborist position have urban forestry  management experience using the above tools and software.            88 City of Meridian, Idaho Management Schedule  As it is difficult to predict not only the rate at which growth will occur, but also the form it will take, a  standards‐based approach is recommended over more prescriptive methods. This allows a threshold‐ driven mechanism for department growth that will adjust for the changing demands of a growing  system. If standards of service are well‐defined, funding and resources may be more readily allocated, as  necessary, toward achieving and maintaining those standards.     Tree Pruning  Overview and General Guidelines   Pruning of all park trees shall take place on a five‐year rotation based on need, except where  immediate pruning is required for reasons of public safety.      The City Arborist will determine all trees in need of pruning.       Pruning shall take place on a five‐year rotation during the off‐season to avoid conflicts with park  users that might compromise public safety. Pruning of larger trees will be determined based on  growth and will be contract pruned, also on the five‐year rotation, or as needed.      The City shall create and maintain an approved list of tree contractors. All contractors will be  required to comply with the universally accepted ANSI (American Nurseryman Standards  Institute) and ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) standards.     Trees shall be monitored for poor health or stress when conditions manifest that could cause  deterioration, particularly after unusual weather events, such as freezing, flooding, high winds,  or due to insect infestation. In such cases, the City Arborist or other qualified staff shall be  consulted to determine appropriate course of action and timing.     Tree Pruning Schedule and Approach   Trees are currently pruned on an established five‐year rotation that includes a mix of contracted  services and pruning by Department staff.     Forestry staff of Meridian Parks and Recreation will perform all pruning that can be  accomplished from the ground. The City does not currently own lift trucks or major pruning  equipment. When other needs arise, like pruning for larger trees and/or large tree and stump  removals, this work shall be done by local tree contractors. City Council generally endorses the  sharing of this work with local contractors and feels it is mutually beneficial to the City and  community.   The City Arborist has established a 10‐year pruning schedule based on a five‐year rotation cycle,  available under separate cover, available from the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department.                   Parks and Recreation Master Plan 89 Equipment – for Tree Pruning and Maintenance  Department‐owned equipment includes:   Chain saws   Pruning equipment   Hand tools    Trucks    Loading equipment    As the urban forest grows, additional equipment may be required should the Parks and Recreation  Department decide to accomplish a larger scope of work in‐house, beyond currently established  practices.     Staffing Implications of Urban Forest Growth  While it is recommended that staff levels be adjusted as necessary to maintain the current standards of  service, it is useful to assess current FTE hours in relation to the size of the urban forest so as to forecast  potential future staffing needs.      Additional Recommendations   Beyond the scope of this chapter, the following action items are recommended to continue to enhance  the Urban Forestry Division and the level of service it provides.    1. Undertake Additional Forestry‐Specific Strategic Planning   The following suggested management and master plans may be funded and commissioned as  consultant‐led efforts, or performed in‐house, depending on staff availability and expertise. The  following is a list of future planning efforts that should be considered to further the efficiency  and long‐term success of the Urban Forestry Division.    Urban Forest Management Plan  This plan will build on this chapter, as well as data collected as part of the GIS inventory of park  system trees. As an option, this planning effort could begin in‐house, using a standard template  from a similar plan, as supplemented by the expertise of managers and future managers.     Arboretum Management and Master Plan  Input from an arboretum design specialist was sought at the inception of the Kleiner Park  Arboretum. Preliminary plan documentation is shown in Figure 15.                             90 City of Meridian, Idaho Figure 16: Working Plan of Kleiner Arboretum                                          Additional planning for the arboretum is needed to address recommendations for growth,  marketing to increase awareness of this little‐known community asset, and suggestions for  enhancing the visitor experience for greater interactivity.      Comprehensive Manual of Planting Details & Guidelines  This effort would enhance health of the urban forest by standardizing size and detailing of  planting areas, requirements for stormwater accommodation, and tree selection to suit site  context and plant cultural requirements, as well as minimizing long‐term maintenance.      Management Plan to Address Risks Posed by Eastern Ash Borer (EAB)  It is recommended that this plan be proactively completed and implementation begun prior to  appearance of the Eastern Ash Borer. Arrival of this insect pest is anticipated in ten years, or  around 2025.     Urban Forest Cost‐Benefits Analysis   A comprehensive cost‐benefit analysis or Meridian’s Urban Forest could help to quantify net  community benefit in terms of:   Improvements to air quality    Carbon sequestration   Reduction in energy consumption   Percentage of park canopy cover   Asset value            Parks and Recreation Master Plan 91 2. Institute a Tree Board or Urban Forest Advisory Council   The Meridian Parks Commission currently acts as an advisory body to the Urban Forestry  component of Meridian Parks and Recreation. It has been active since the adoption of the local  Tree Ordinance in 2002. In the future, it may be appropriate to institute an advisory council  devoted solely to Urban Forestry.     It is recommended that the City Arborist provide a quarterly update to the Meridian Parks  Commission, or acting advisory council. In addition to reporting, these interactions should  include training relative to the Commission’s responsibilities in Urban Forestry matters, and  alert them to common situations and issues that may arise. Beyond education, frequent  communication also helps to bridge any potential gaps in continuity due to council turnover.     A key current responsibility of the Parks and Recreation Commission includes hearing public  appeals to decisions made by the City Arborist. In such instances, the Commission’s ruling is sent  to City Council for final approval.      Duties of the existing Parks Commission may also include:   Supporting the planning process for and implementation of a future Urban Forest  Management Plan.   Public education related to the importance of trees and the urban forest.   Funding assistance with regards to grant applications, solicitation of private donations,  and facilitation of public‐private partnerships.    3. Ongoing Staff Training to Stay Current in the Industry  It is recommended that the Urban Forestry Division seek opportunities for continuing education  to stay current with changes that may occur within the field of urban forestry. In addition,  managers should seek and/or provide staff training:   To groundskeepers and forestry assistants with specialized experience relative to tree  pruning, especially with regard to the Kleiner Arboretum and other specialized  landscapes.   On forestry‐specific GIS software used as an urban forest management tool.   As needed to respond to growth and changing conditions.    4.  Take a More Active Role in Construction Management  It is recommended that qualified forestry staff inspect the installation of trees on future park  properties and rights‐of‐way the City will be responsible for maintaining.      Summary  The urban forest, when well‐managed, diverse, and healthy, provides generous benefits to a  community. Trees beautify landscapes and streetscapes, improve the health of environments, and  enhance the user experience of parks and public spaces by providing shade and relief from summer  heat. Beyond health and comfort, this shade can mitigate for “heat islands” created by increased  urbanization, and offer passive cooling of homes and buildings that results in energy savings.         92 City of Meridian, Idaho Unlike some components of the built environment whose values depreciate over time, the urban forest  is a living system whose value only increases with the passing years. Successful long‐term management  of the urban forest must not only consider trees, but also site conditions and infrastructure components  and their relationship to the overall health of the system.     It is also important to generate awareness of the benefits provided by the urban forest. The more the  local community is educated on the value of the forest over time, the greater the investment in the  forest, not only by professionals and managers of public lands, but by individual property owners, each  contributing to the vitality and longevity of the whole.  J. Pathways Assessment & Recommendations  Introduction  This section is intended as an update to the Meridian Pathways Master Plan (Adopted in 2007 and  previously amended in January of 2010) and a tool to further aid in the implementation of that plan. It  does not suggest any significant changes to proposed expansion of the pathway system as outlined in  the original plan, but rather seeks to accomplish the following objectives:   Quantify the impacts of pathway system expansion in terms of cost for ongoing maintenance,  given the significant proposed increase to pathway mileage at plan build‐out.   Establish guidelines for what portion of the pathway system is appropriate and sustainable for  the City to maintain.   Establish City priorities for near‐term pathway implementation that will have the greatest  impact on connectivity.   Propose changes to existing policy that will facilitate ongoing expansion and designate  maintenance responsibilities so as to meet the needs of the City, the development community,  and other stakeholders.     Pathway System Overview  The current breakdown of Meridian’s existing pathways, by type, is as follows:   14.8 miles of pathways currently maintained by the City   7.9 miles in parks   6.9 miles along canals and other areas  14 miles (approximately) maintained by HOAs and other entities     28.8 Miles of Total Developed Pathways     Per the existing pathways plan, an additional 104.2 miles have been identified for development.       This amounts to a total projected mileage at build out of 133 miles.    Importance of Pathways/Need  Pathways make communities more livable by helping to reduce reliance on the automobile. This has the  potential to improve the environment and mitigate for traffic congestion. Additionally, pathways  provide ongoing opportunities for physical activity to promote physical and mental health. Beyond  connecting people to places, pathways also provide ongoing opportunities to be out and about that  connect us interpersonally as well.                                                                  Per Dave Peterson, Design Concepts  Numbers per Meridian Pathways Master Plan, current mileage updates per Jay Gibbons    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 93 Need  Throughout the needs assessment and outreach phase of this planning effort, community members  consistently rated pathways as a high priority when given opportunity to comment via stakeholder  group, survey, or public meeting. This reflects a national trend wherein pathways are increasingly  important to communities.     While Meridian has identified a pathway system for development that will ultimately prove extensive,  connectivity among currently built pathways continues to be a challenge.    Some of this is due to existing major roadways and other potential barriers to pedestrian traffic, but also  existing development that occurred before pedestrian connections were required as part of the  approvals process. Stakeholders who own linear properties along existing waterways that cut through  the City are also key to enhancing the overall connectivity of the pathway system.     Stakeholders    Irrigation Districts    Nampa‐Meridian Irrigation District – Major Stakeholder.   Settlers Irrigation District – Fewer land holdings in Meridian.    West Ada School District   History of successfully partnering with the school district.   Joint use of school facilities plays a key role in filling recreation demand for ball fields  and active recreation facilities.   School properties are important when it comes to making connections, and offer  opportunities for safer crossings and connections, further off (or outside of) public  rights‐of‐way.   Developers    Homeowners’ Associations (HOAs)   City of Meridian – Building Department   Railroads   Potential for sharing existing rights‐of‐way that can achieve connection on a more  regional level.    Progress Update/Policies Implemented  Since adoption of the original Meridian Pathways Master Plan, significant progress has been made  toward implementation. Much of this has focused on the establishment of policy and planning practices  around pathway development that will lay the groundwork for greater connectivity moving forward.                           94 City of Meridian, Idaho Policy and Procedural Improvements Achieved Since Approval of Original Plan   Entitlements process for development now requires dedicated easements for pathways and  pedestrian connections.     Plan review for all new development must be routed through the Pathways Project Manager for  design input and approval, in addition to other departments as required.     Developers are required to provide better documentation of construction standards/as‐builts  for pathways that may later be deeded to the City.      Standard Specifications and Notes for pathway construction have been developed (in  conjunction with Meridian Public Works)—similar to a performance specification.      Pathway entitlement is no longer a part of the Development Agreement.     Expectation has been established among developers that working with the City to provide  pathway connections will be a standard project requirement. The City has seen improved  cooperation and general acknowledgement from the development community that pathways  benefit and add value to their final product.    Opportunities/Recommendations    Maintain a Regional Perspective   Emphasize the need to look beyond Meridian to neighboring communities and think in terms of  regional connections to Boise River Greenbelt, Eagle, Nampa, Caldwell, Star, and Kuna.     Consider Meridian’s system as it relates to a regional pathway system.     The pending acquisition of Margaret Aldape Park presents an opportunity for Meridian to  connect to the Boise River Greenbelt system. This will provide connection to the rest of the  Treasure Valley on a regional level.    Schools   Use proximity to schools, when possible, and take advantage of existing signaled crossings in  school zones.     Provide pedestrian connections between all schools and pathway system.     Safe Routes to Schools have already been mapped.    Examine these in greater detail and adjust as necessary.   Find/create connections between multi‐use pathways and schools.                Parks and Recreation Master Plan 95 Subdivision Development   Continue to work with developers to dedicate pathway easements and make strong pedestrian  connections.     Pedestrian connections shall be identified and preserved prior to development.     Coordinate with developers during the entitlements process to allow alternative routes through  developments, regardless of ditch or waterway location (if applicable).    Existing Rights‐of‐Way   Where pathways must be integrated with public rights‐of‐way, revise street sections to provide  for wider sidewalks and greater separation from major roadways, if possible.     As‐Builts and Documentation   The Building Department shall notify the Parks & Pathways Project Manager of all pathways,  once built. Institute mechanisms for better post‐construction reporting and documentation.    Key Stakeholders for Pathway Implementation   In recent years, the City has made significant progress in terms of policy to further development of the  pathway system as pertains to involvement by other property owners and stakeholders. This  momentum must continue, and relationships further developed, with the following key stakeholders.     Irrigation Districts  Due to the linear nature of waterways, Irrigation Districts (especially Nampa‐Meridian) are key to  advancing connectivity of the Meridian pathways plan. It is imperative that the City continues to partner  with irrigation districts relative to the following challenges:   Pathway development along existing canals, irrigation ditches, and laterals needs to be  addressed at a more comprehensive level.     Crossings present a special difficulty in that many waterways do not emerge at intersections  where pedestrian crossings exist and are safely articulated. For example, it is not acceptable for  pathways to emerge at the edge of a 45 mph collector road with minimal shoulder and no  proximity to an intersection for safe crossing.      In the past, irrigation districts have refused pathway proposals prior to any constructive  discussion regarding their development. Both parties now have a history of working together  and must continue to fine‐tune this partnership as each new pathway segment is implemented.    Developers   Residential and commercial developments present challenges when it comes to providing  pathway easements. The City must work closely with developers during the planning phases, as  it can be prohibitive to accomplish these connections after the fact.              96 City of Meridian, Idaho Implementation Priorities  Because so many miles of pathway have been identified for development per the Pathways Master Plan,  it is recommended that City resources focus on implementation and maintenance of the following major  components of the system. Once a strong framework is established, users will enjoy greater  connectivity, and secondary pathways can then tie into and expand the reach of the overall system.     The following pathways have been identified as high priorities for CIP and maintenance funds. This is  intended as a general guideline for resource allocation by the City, as timing and location of private  development may catalyze construction of lower priority pathways by others.     High Priority Pathways       Existing  Proposed Total  Five‐Mile Creek Pathway    2.37    8.64  11.01 miles  Ten‐Mile Creek Pathway    2.03    9.00  11.03 miles  Rail‐with‐Trail     0      8.08    8.08 miles    TOTAL PROPOSED      30.18 Miles        Regional Impact of Rail‐with‐Trail   This proposed pathway will have a significant impact on regional connectivity, as it will encompass a 22‐ mile right of way, with eight of those miles passing through the City of Meridian. The combination Rail‐ with‐Trail section, as proposed, will run between the historic railroad depots in Boise and Nampa.     Because development of this pathway will deliver considerable benefits to Boise, Nampa, and others, in  addition to Meridian, implementation of this pathway will require a co‐operative effort from all  municipalities affected, acting as regional partners, with help from COMPASS and other local agencies  and organizations.   All Other Proposed Pathways  It is anticipated that implementation of this pathway will be driven largely by private developers, with  ongoing maintenance provided by Homeowners’ Associations.     Implementation Costs for Plan Build‐Out  Even with a mandate to focus resources on the development of a few high‐priority segments, cost to  construct these pathways will be considerable. At the time of this plan, construction cost for a 10’ wide  asphalt path was approximately $36 per lineal foot, or $190,080 per mile. For estimating purposes, this  figure includes base material and preparation, as well as asphalt paving, but no administrative or design  costs associated with construction.     Pathways have been identified as a major priority for the City of Meridian, but given the demands on  public funds for other recreational facilities, the cost for build‐out of the pathway system must  necessarily be considered within a greater funding context and borne, in large part, by private sector  development.              Parks and Recreation Master Plan 97 Pathway Maintenance and Operations    Implications of System Expansion on Maintenance   With growth in recent years, the City has taken advantage of opportunities to develop pathway  connections through proposed developments. Verbiage around these development agreements  continues to evolve, but in the past, situations have arisen in which the City has been deeded ownership  (and associated maintenance) of a pathway not constructed to City standards.     It is essential to establish mechanisms for construction documentation of pathways that will guarantee  new segments are built to City standards, not only to ensure public safety, but to also minimize  maintenance impacts over time.      Need for Shared Responsibility  As time goes on, even with high standards for construction, the pathway system will grow beyond the  ability of the City to maintain it. Ultimate responsibility for maintenance of the pathway system must  be shared between the City and private landowners (often Homeowners’ associations). It is  recommended that the City transition to requiring that maintenance of future pathways implemented  as part of subdivision developments be borne by private stakeholders.     Linear Rights‐of‐Way/Canal Pathways  Irrigation district requirements for pathway development:   City acts as single point of contact   City must maintain pathway segments or coordinate maintenance with private sector/HOAs   City must enforce irrigation district requirements with other parties    Individual licensing agreement recommendations:   Require HOAs to maintain pathways, in perpetuity, to standards for safe public use and  established landscape aesthetics   Incorporate strong wording in these agreements to make clear to private developers that the  City will no longer assume long‐term maintenance of pathways.   Shall institute mechanisms for enforcement and oversight.      Replacement Cycle for Paved Pathways  Clear delineation of maintenance responsibility is a necessity, owing to the limited life span of asphalt  pavement (30 years on average). In order for pathways to remain safe and well‐maintained as the  system ages, a portion of paved pathway segments will require periodic re‐paving on an ongoing basis.     In other words, similar to the way City trees are pruned on a 5‐year cycle, so must pathways be  resurfaced on a periodic maintenance rotation.     Life Cycle Repaving Costs  Assuming a total pathway system comprised of 133 miles of pathway that require re‐paving every 30  years, estimated minimum cost to repave the entire system is as follows:     133 miles of pathway x $142,560/mile  = $18.9 million every 30 years        or = $632,000 annually      98 City of Meridian, Idaho Additional pathways proposed in the Master Plan are desired by the community and essential to the  ultimate success of the plan. However, because this increased mileage carries significant cost  implications, maintenance of the system in its entirety will ultimately lie beyond the resources of the  City.                                 Assumptions:   Unit cost to repave is calculated at $27 per lineal foot or $142,560 per mile for a   10‐foot wide asphalt pathway.     Average lifespan of pathway segment is 30 years.     Priority pathways include:   Five Mile Creek Pathway   Ten Mile Creek Pathway   Rail‐With‐Trail    Relevant Studies and Planning Efforts   The following studies, completed since the Pathways Master Plan (adopted 2007; amended 2010, 2012)  should be considered relative to the existing plan and recommendations contained in this chapter.     Arterial Crossing Study   Union Pacific Railroad/Rail with Trail Study (January 2015)   Destination Downtown   Information gathering and updates to downtown streetscapes   Includes detailed pavement sections, also standard notes and specifications    Summary  Significant progress has been made toward implementation of the current Pathways Master Plan.  Because connectivity continues to be a challenge, it is recommended that the City focus implementation  efforts on a few priority pathways.       Cost Comparison for Repaving the  Total Pathway Network vs. Priority Pathways Only     Total  Total Cost to   Mileage Repave at Build Out    Total Pathway Network 133 $632,016 annually         Priority Pathways Only 30 $143,130 annually      Parks and Recreation Master Plan 99 Beyond that, given the extent of the proposed system and an understanding of the projected costs for  build‐out and ongoing maintenance, it becomes clear that these demands will, over time, exceed the  resources of the City. Moving forward, it will be crucial to shift some of the construction burden to  private developers, who will typically retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for these  pathways, so they may better contribute to the sustainability and success of the overall system.      K. Summary of Planning Process for Conceptual Park Master Plans  Project Team Visioning  Preliminary design efforts for the three undeveloped park properties began with a project team  discussion of potential opportunities for each park. These ideas were then summarized in a series of  concept statements.     The summarized statements described a vision for each of the three regional parks, not only in terms of  the type and number of amenities that might be included, but also suggested ideas for keying into  contextual, historical, or other elements specific to each park, with the goal to reinforce a strong sense  of place and establish each as a unique destination within the Meridian Parks and Recreation system.    Full concept statements may be viewed in Appendix F.    Concept Narratives  South Meridian Regional Park         (77‐Acre Property)  This park will be devoted to active recreation, similar to a Settlers Park, with theming and design  elements that will reinforce a unique identity for a south Meridian regional park. A destination softball  complex, illuminated for nighttime play and with the capacity to host area tournaments, will be part of  this identity. Theming elements may include: planting design to evoke the native sage land area to the  north (for non‐irrigated turf areas), and also integrated art works ‐‐ one perhaps featuring Meridian‐ born Pittsburgh Pirates Baseball player Vern Law—to tie into local history and culture.      West Meridian Regional Park   (Borup‐Bottles Property – 47 acres)  The Borup‐Bottles property is envisioned as a smaller‐scale regional park with primarily active recreation  facilities similar in size and scope to the existing Heroes Park. The recent needs assessment conducted  as part of the Comprehensive Parks & Recreation Master Planning effort determined that rodeo  facilities, while important to some, are no longer appropriate for the City to offer and will not be  included in this park master plan. It is suggested that theming elements, art, architecture, and other  design materials for this park should focus on the agrarian/dairy heritage of the area that is  representative of “Old Meridian,” much of which has been lost to new development in recent decades.      Margaret Aldape Park           (70 acres, approximately)  Margaret Aldape Park will be a natural, passive‐use area unlike any other park in Meridian’s park  system. This is primarily due to its riverfront location and the unique opportunities for passive  recreation, including walking/hiking, picnicking, fishing, wildlife viewing, and non‐motorized water  sports, such as kayaking and paddle‐boarding, that this landscape affords. Emphasis will be on the  development of pedestrian pathways to provide access to the site in a variety of seasons and  corresponding water levels. There is also opportunity to enhance current wildlife habitat to sustain and  promote the diverse species, including waterfowl, great blue heron, turkey, foxes, deer and elk, which  live in and migrate through the park site.       100 City of Meridian, Idaho At the time of this plan, the southern park boundary remains proposed but yet‐to‐be‐determined. Final  delineation of the park boundary will be an iterative process that takes into account the final revised  FEMA floodway boundary; need for park land outside the floodway that can provide parking, restrooms  and other constructed support amenities; and priorities of the proposed adjacent residential  development.     In terms of theming and identity, park design will take its cues from the Boise River environment,  Basque culture and history, and elements of Aldape family history. Theming may relate to paths and  architectural elements, materials, place names, integrated art pieces, and other design opportunities as  they arise.     Design Programming  After agreeing on general a conceptual approach to the design for each park, the team developed a  detailed list of program elements for each. This provided a starting point for the creation of design  concepts.     Programming for each park site was founded on needs identified in the initial needs assessment. This  information was then filtered through the more specific working knowledge of the Meridian Parks and  Recreation project team which included staff who deal directly with programming and scheduling  demands for facilities on an ongoing basis.      Concept Development  Site Analysis  Graphic site analyses were created for the South and West Meridian Regional Park properties. These  diagrams summarized existing drainage patterns on site, potential irrigation water sources, locations of  existing and future utilities, surrounding land uses and traffic patterns, and any other existing conditions  that might affect design and development of the site.     A lengthy walking field trip and site visit was taken to the Aldape Property, but as no boundary  information was available at the time, site analysis information was recorded primarily in the form of  notes and photographs. No formal summary graphic was created.      Preliminary Concepts/Staff Review  For South Meridian Regional Park and West Meridian Regional Park, preliminary concepts were  developed and presented to staff for review, then adjusted in a series of iterative meetings and  discussions.     At this point in the process, focus was on placement of park amenities and desired adjacencies to  achieve functional relationships among all elements on site. Parking needs were estimated relative to  proposed park amenities, and anticipated use.                     Parks and Recreation Master Plan 101 Development of Final Design Concepts  As a result of these more specific functional considerations, and after additional collaboration between  the design consultant and MPR staff, the preliminary designs were refined into preferred master plan  concepts for each park. Though not executed to a high level of detail, the conceptual plans aimed to  establish a realistic development scenario for each property, establish a strong design aesthetic, and  create a unique sense of place for each proposed park.     Each concept was then rendered in color for presentation at a community open house.    Community Input    Community Open Houses  Community open houses were held for the South Meridian Regional Park (77‐Acre Property) and West  Meridian Regional Park (Borup‐Bottles Property) on Thursday July 9, 2015, and Thursday, July 30, 2015,  respectively.     Each meeting included an initial summary of the overall master planning process and needs assessment  by Meridian Parks and Recreation staff. The consultant team then offered a site analysis overview  before presenting each concept in detail. Limited questions and discussion of the concepts were  entertained before breaking into less formal interactions for the sake of obtaining community input.     At each meeting, opportunities for public comment included:   Written comment cards   Opportunity to “draw” input on black‐and‐white concept plans that were provided around the  room, along with colored markers   Face‐to‐face conversation with design consultants and MPR Staff    Due to timing and other considerations relative to the donation of the Aldape Property, a community  open house was not held for the Aldape Park Master Plan.                                             THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 103 V. Key Issues    Triangulation Matrix  Key issues were identified using a number of tools: review of existing plans and documents, focus  groups, stakeholder meetings, a community survey, inventory and level of service analysis, and My  Sidewalk online engagement. The information gathered from these sources was evaluated, and the  following recommendations and action plans were developed.    The findings are summarized on the Key Issues Matrix (Table 10), which captures all of the key issues  that surfaced during the Master Plan process and prioritizes them on one matrix. The key issues were  placed into four categories on the matrix:   a) Priority  b) Opportunity to Improve  c) Minor or Future Issue   Left blank means the issue did not come up or wasn’t addressed in that venue    The qualitative data planning tools used to determine the priority of key issues include:  1. Existing planning documents  2. Consultant team’s expertise  3. SWOT Analysis  4. Parks and Recreation staff input  5. Public forum input    The quantitative data planning tools used to determine the priority of the key issues include:  1. Community Survey  2. City Data  3. GRASP Analysis    The key issues were organized into four areas including:  1. Organizational  2. Finance  3. Programs and Service Delivery  4. Facility and Amenities    Preliminary recommendations are listed for each key issue and presented to the Parks and Recreation  project team to gather input on the prioritization of the final recommendations and action plans. The  Key Issues Matrix summarizes the areas that need immediate attention and determine the direction of  the implementation of recommendations in the Master Plan.                    104 City of Meridian, Idaho Table 10: Key Issues Analysis Matrix          Using the Key Issues Matrix, a summary of all research, analysis, and input assembled for this study, a  variety of recommendations have emerged.      Parks and Recreation Master Plan 107 VI. Great Things to Come – Recommendations and Action Plans   A. Recommendations  After analyzing the Findings that resulted from this process, including the Key Issues Matrix, a summary  of all research, the qualitative and quantitative data, the GRASP® LOS analyses, and input assembled for  this study, a variety of recommendations have emerged to provide guidance in consideration of how to  improve parks, recreation, and pathway opportunities in the City of Meridian. This section describes  ways to enhance the level of service and the quality of life with improvement through organizational  efficiencies, financial opportunities, improved programming and service delivery, and maintenance and  improvements to facilities and amenities.                                          Organizational:   Maintain existing level of service goal   Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department  activities and services   Provide improved signage agency‐wide to make it easier for patrons to find and use  parks, facilities, and pathways   Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities   Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways   Increase appropriate partnerships within the community   Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies   Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service   Maintain and keep current the Department Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)  and Policies   Expand Volunteer Program    Financial:   Increase Special Event and Activities Sponsorships   Evaluate Developer Impact Fee Ordinance   Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities   Implement a cost recovery and pricing policy   108 City of Meridian, Idaho     Goal 1: Continue to Improve Organizational Efficiencies    Objective 1.1 – Maintain existing level of service goal  The City of Meridian currently has a Level of Service that is three acres of developed park land per 1,000  persons with a goal of increasing to a Level of Service Standard of four acres/1,000 persons by 2040.  Additionally, the City should develop a Level of Service Standard that considers components within parks  and a radius of .5 miles per component for walkability.    Objective 1.2 – Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding department  activities and services.  The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to implement the Marketing Plan  (Communication Plan) that will guide the Department’s efforts in communicating and promoting its  activities, services, and facilities. This will continue to create great awareness and should include all the  recommendations in the Master Plan for programs, services, and facility upgrades. Additionally, the  Marketing Plan should be reviewed annually and updated as needed and include marketing strategies  that incorporate the efforts of partner departments and projects.     The marketing and communication of Parks and Recreation Department activities should be enhanced  with a focused effort on adopting open lines of communication and meetings with partners and  potential partners within the community. This enhanced focus will help to create advocacy in the  community and provide a forum to better celebrate the successes of the Department.              Programs and Service Delivery:   Increase year round recreational programming and activities    Facilities and Amenities:   Maintain and improve existing facilities and amenities    Expand pathways and connectivity   Add indoor recreation space   Develop new amenities at new and existing parks based on level of service analysis   Acquire new land for parks   Improve parking at parks   Continue to improve ADA accessibility at all facilities   Upgrade comfort, convenience, and cultural amenities to existing facilities   Add destination park amenities   Address current and future needs for athletic fields   Consider programming needs when adding components to existing parks or when  developing new parks   Monitor use, demand, and trends of recreation components    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 109 Objective 1.3 – Provide improved signage agency‐wide to make it easier for patrons to find and use  parks, facilities, and pathways.  The Parks and Recreation Department should evaluate directional and wayfinding signage to facilities on  roadway, pathways, and within parks. Additionally, the Department should develop signage standards  for parks and update existing park signs as parks are renovated to meet the new standard. Improved  wayfinding signage will contribute to a greater connectivity of parks, facilities, and pathways.    Objective 1.4 – Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities.  There was an overwhelming public response to make sure that Parks and Recreation maintains and  improves existing facilities. The Department should continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities  and amenities as well as address low scoring components through the CIP Plan and the Life Cycle  Maintenance Program.     Objective 1.5 – Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways.  Mobile marketing is a trend of the future. Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much  higher rates than adults in age brackets 30 and older. Usage rates of mobile applications demonstrate  that chronologically across four major age cohorts, Millennials tend to get information more frequently  using mobile devices, such as smart phones. Parks and Recreation should explore additional social media  uses and navigation apps for parks and pathways. The City of Meridian has current best practices for  social media that should be followed, reviewed annually, and updated as is needed.    Objective 1.6 – Increase appropriate partnerships within the community.  The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department currently partners with a number of agencies to  provide programs and activities to the community. The Department should continue to explore  additional opportunities, as well as build on their existing partnerships. Where not already in place, the  Department should ensure that all existing and future partnerships are accurately portrayed in a signed  partnership agreement (Sample Partnership Policy can be found in Appendix G).    The City of Meridian Strategic Plan that was adopted in 2015 sets a goal of continuing to explore  partnerships with alternative providers to increase level of service. Additionally, the Department should  identify desired sports facilities or complexes and establish partnerships that foster their development.    Objective 1.7 – Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies.  The Department should continue to explore additional opportunities to expand the use of technology  Department wide. Some immediate area to increase technology within the Department would be  provide online shelter reservations and provide a mobile application of the Department’s website.    Objective 1.8 – Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service.  As recommendations in the Master Plan for programs, services, new facilities, pathways, parks, and  facility upgrades are implemented, it is important to maintain staffing levels to maintain current  performance standards. This will require the new positions both in parks and recreation.        110 City of Meridian, Idaho Objective 1.9 – Maintain and keep current the Department Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and  Policies.  The Parks and Recreation Department is governed by City Code and internal standards of operations and  policies. The Department should review the City Code Chapter for Parks and Recreation annually and  recommend updates as needed. Additionally, staff should review Department SOPs and policies annually  and update as needed.    Objective 1.10 – Expand the volunteer program  The Department currently has a Park Ambassador Program that could be reviewed, improved, and  expanded to meet its growing needs. Additionally, it should continue to make use of other volunteer  opportunities for park projects and events.    Goal 2: Increase Financial Opportunities    Objective 2.1 – Increase special event and activities sponsorships.  The Department should continue to explore additional sponsorship opportunities and build on existing  sponsorships. All existing and future sponsorships should be evaluated to ensure that they are  accurately portrayed in a signed sponsorship agreement (Sample Sponsorship Policy can be found in  Appendix E).    Objective 2.2 – Evaluate Developer Impact Fee Ordinance.  The current Developer Impact Fee is based on a LOS of 3.04 acres of developed park land per 1,000  people. As the Department moves toward their goal of four acres of developed park land per 1,000  people, they need to review the ordinance every three years to keep current with the LOS. Additionally,  the Department should review its Developer Impact Fee revenue annually to align with CIP requests and  existing LOS.    Objective 2.3 – Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities.  The Department currently takes advantage of grant opportunities available for programming, services,  and facility improvements. The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to pursue any and all  grant opportunities at the federal, state, regional, and local levels. To accomplish this, the Department  may consider contracting with a dedicated grant writer to research, submit, and track such grants.    Objective 2.4 –Implement a cost recovery and pricing  policy.  The Department currently has a practice of cost recovery,  but it varies based on the different service areas. The Parks  and Recreation Department should implement a Cost  Recovery Policy, such as the Pyramid Pricing Methodology  (Appendix F) to determine a consistent method of pricing  Parks and Recreation activities throughout the Department.  As part of the policy, the Department should continue to  support the current Care Enough to Share Scholarship  Program.         Parks and Recreation Master Plan 111 In addition to establishing a Cost Recovery and Pricing Policy, the Department should explore the  feasibility of a dedicated revenue for parks and recreation through special revenue funds, sports,  tourism, or other available sources.    Goal 3: Continue to Improve Programs and Service Delivery    Objective 3.1 – Increase year round recreational programming and activities.  The Department should continue to look for opportunities to expand indoor recreational programs and  activities. The community would like to see additional programs for tweens, teens, people with special  needs, and seniors. As new programs are developed, continue to monitor recreational trends to stay  current with programming and demand. As popularity in program offerings and activities increases,  continue to look for opportunities to expand programs around working hours and commuting citizens  schedules.     The City’s Strategic Plan has also set a goal to attract, promote, and maintain a “signature” event for the  City, and to set targets, identify gaps, and deploy programs, activities, and events that provide family‐ centered recreational opportunities.    Goal 4: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities    Objective 4.1 – Maintain and improve existing facilities.  The Department should continue to implement existing plans, the CIP, Life Cycle Replacement Programs,  and the Master Plan. These plans should be reviewed annually and updated as needed.    Objective 4.2 – Expand pathways and connectivity.  The Department should continue to implement the existing Pathways Master Plan and update as  needed based on annual reviews. As new and existing pathways are designed and renovated, the  Department should consider adding fitness stations and family fun stations in appropriate locations  along the pathways.     Objective 4.3 – Add indoor recreation space.  Based on feedback from focus group participants and the survey results, there is a need for additional  indoor recreation space. The Department should continue to explore opportunities to add additional  indoor recreation space either through partnerships, purchase of an existing facility, or construction of a  Community Center or Fieldhouse. Another option would be to explore opportunities to add Community  Centers to newly planned elementary schools.     Objective 4.4 – Develop new amenities at existing parks based on level of service analysis.  Demand for usage of Meridian parks and athletic facilities continue to grow, and the Department should  look for opportunities to add new amenities to enhance the experience for users. As Meridian continues  to grow, the Department should look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in those new growth  areas. Also, based on the GRASP® analysis, the Department should look for opportunities to add new  components at existing parks where the level of service is below threshold.              112 City of Meridian, Idaho Objective 4.5 – Acquire new land for parks.  Based on population growth and a LOS goal of reaching four acres of developed park land per 1,000  population, the Department needs to continue to find and purchase additional land for future park  development. When considering new parks, priority should be given to areas where LOS is below  threshold.    Objective 4.6 – Improve parking at parks.  Parking was an issue that was identified at most of the focus groups. The Department should continue  to monitor parking during peak usage times and explore the need to improve and potentially add more  parking at appropriate parks and amenities. Another consideration would be to explore alternative  transportation options to reduce parking demand.    Objective 4.7 – Continue to improve ADA accessibility at all facilities.  According to the ADA.gov website, “Access to civic life by people with disabilities is a fundamental goal  of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). To ensure that this goal is met, Title II of the ADA requires  State and local governments to make their programs and services accessible to persons with disabilities…  One important way to ensure that Title II's requirements are being met in cities of all sizes is through self‐ evaluation, which is required by the ADA regulations. Self‐evaluation enables local governments to  pinpoint the facilities, programs, and services that must be modified or relocated to ensure that local  governments are complying with the ADA.”     Parks and Recreation currently does not have an ADA Accessibility Transition Plan which identified  needed changes during a self‐evaluation process. The Department needs to conduct a self‐evaluation  and develop a comprehensive transition plan. Once the ADA Transition Plan is developed and adopted,  it should be updated at least every five years.    Objective 4.8 – Upgrade comfort, convenience, and cultural amenities to existing facilities.  As the Department is making upgrades to, and improving, existing facilities, it should explore  opportunities to add shade, storage, security lighting, synthetic turf, and other amenities appropriately  at existing facilities. Working with the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Department should seek  opportunities to create individual identities for each Neighborhood Park. Where appropriate, look for  opportunities to add public art to new and existing facilities.    Objective 4.9 – Add destination park amenities.  As citizen interest grows, and demand for new and different amenities at parks are identified, the  Department should explore opportunities to add destination playgrounds and natural play areas at  existing parks. The newly adopted Strategic Plan also has a goal to foster development of Discovery  Parks that uniquely blend arts, entertainment, and culture.    Objective 4.10 – Address current and future needs for athletic fields.  As demand warrants, explore opportunities to add rectangle and diamond fields as usage increases. To  help increase field time, add sports field lighting to new facilities and improvements to lighting at  existing facilities where appropriate. Additionally, the Department should consider upgrading or adding  synthetic turf fields as use and demand increases.          Parks and Recreation Master Plan 113 Objective 4.11 – Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or  when developing new parks.  Continue to evaluate the programming needs of the community when developing new parks or when  adding new components to existing parks.    Objective 4.12 – Monitor use, demands, and trends of recreation components.  Through the use of dashboards and other reporting and tracking tools, continue to monitor and evaluate  the use, demands, and trends in recreation amenities.    B. Action Plan, Cost Estimates, and Prioritization  The following Goals, Objectives, and Action Items for the recommendations are drawn from the public  input, inventory, level of service analysis, community survey, findings feedback, and all the information  gathered during the master planning process with a primary focus on maintaining, sustaining, and  improving City of Meridian parks, recreation, and pathways. All cost estimates are in 2015 figures where  applicable. Most costs are dependent on the extent of the enhancements and improvements  determined.    Timeframe to complete is designated as:   Short‐term (up to 3 years)   Mid‐term (4‐6 years)   Long‐term (7‐10 years)    Goal 1: Continue to Improve Organizational Efficiencies  Objective 1.1:  Maintain existing level of service goal  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.1.a   Continue the planning goal of four acres of developed park  land per 1,000 population.  TBD Staff Time Ongoing  Objective 1.2:  Enhance and improve internal and external communication regarding Department activities and services  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.2.a  Continue to implement the Marketing Plan  (Communication Plan).  $0 Staff Time Short‐Term  1.2.b  Review annually and update the Marketing Plan as  needed.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing    114 City of Meridian, Idaho Objective 1.3:  Provide improved signage agency‐wide to make it easier for patrons to find and use parks, facilities, and  pathways  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.3.a   Evaluate directional and wayfinding signage to facilities on  roadways, pathways, and within parks.  $0 Staff Time Short‐Term  1.3.b  Develop signage standards for parks. $0 Staff Time Short‐Term  1.3.c  Enhance and update existing park signs as parks are  renovated.  TBD Staff Time Ongoing  Objective 1.4:  Maintain existing quality standards for facilities and amenities  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.4.a   Continue to improve and upgrade existing facilities and  amenities through the CIP Plan and the Life Cycle  Maintenance Programs.  See CIP Plan  and Life Cycle  Maintenance  Programs  Staff Time Ongoing  Objective 1.5:  Increase social media use and navigation apps for parks and pathways  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.5.a   Explore additional social media uses and navigation apps  for parks and pathways.  TBD Staff Time Short‐Term  1.5.b  Follow current social media best practices, review  annually, and recommend updates as needed.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  Objective 1.6:  Increase appropriate partnerships within the community  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.6.a   Explore additional partnership opportunities as well as  build on existing partnerships with focus on low service  areas.  $0  Staff Time  TBD  Potential increased  revenue or  decreased  expenses  Ongoing  1.6.b  Ensure all existing and future partnerships are accurately  portrayed in a signed partnership agreement (Sample  Partnership Policy has been provided as a separate staff  resource document).  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  1.6.c  Identify desired sports facilities or complexes and establish  partnerships that foster their development.   TBD Staff Time Ongoing    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 115         1.6.d  Continue to explore partnerships with alternative  providers to increase level of service. (Strategic Plan 5.A.2)  TBD Staff Time Ongoing  Objective 1.7:  Increase the utilization of technology to improve customer service and efficiencies  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.7.a   Continue to explore additional opportunities to expand the  use of technology Department wide.  $0    Staff Time    Ongoing  1.7.b   Increase the use of technology by providing online shelter  reservations and a mobile application of the Department’s  website.   TBD Staff Time Short‐Term  Objective 1.8:  Staff appropriately to meet demand and maintain established quality of service  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.8.a  Hire and train staff for current and future parks, facilities,  and pathways maintenance demands.  $0 TBD  Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  1.8.b  Hire and train staff for current and future recreation  programming and facility usage demands.  $0 TBD  Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  Objective 1.9:  Maintain and keep current the Department Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Policies  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.9.a  Review Department SOP and policies annually and update  as needed.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  1.9.b  Review the City Code Chapter for Parks and Recreation  annually and recommend updates as needed.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  Objective 1.10:  Expand the volunteer program  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  1.10.a  Improve the current Park Ambassador Program.  $0 Staff Time Short‐Term  1.10.b  Continue to make use of other volunteer opportunities for  park projects and events.  $0 Staff Time On‐going    116 City of Meridian, Idaho Goal 2: Increase Financial Opportunities  Objective 2.1  Increase special event and activities sponsorships  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  2.1.a   Explore additional sponsorship opportunities and  build on existing sponsorships.  $0  Staff Time  TBD  Potential increased  revenue or  decreased  expenses  Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  2.1.b  Ensure that all existing and future sponsorships are  accurately portrayed in a signed sponsorship  agreement (Sample Sponsorship Policy has been  provided as a separate staff resource document).  $0 Staff Time  Short Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  Objective 2.2:  Evaluate Developer Impact Fee Ordinance  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  2.2.a  Review Developer Impact Fee revenue annually to  align with CIP requests and existing LOS.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  2.2.b  Review Impact Fee Ordinance approximately every  five years.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  Objective 2.3:  Pursue grant and philanthropic opportunities  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  2.3.a  Continue to seek philanthropic donations and grant  opportunities.  $0 Staff Time Short‐Term  2.3.b  Consider contracting with a dedicated grant writer to  research, submit, and track federal, regional, state,  and local grants.  Potential Matching  Funds TBD  % of successful  grants TBD Short‐Term  Objective 2.4:  Implement a cost recovery and pricing policy  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  2.4.a  Continue periodic evaluation of fees for programs and  facilities.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  2.4.b  Continue to support the current Care Enough to Share  Scholarship Program.  $0 $0 Ongoing  2.4.c  Develop a cost recovery and pricing policy. $40,000 Staff Time Short‐Term    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 117 2.4.d  Explore feasibility of a dedicated funding source for  parks and recreation through special revenue, sports, or  other available sources.  TBD Staff Time Short‐Term    Goal 3: Continue to Improve Programs and Service Delivery    Goal 4: Maintain and Improve Facilities and Amenities  Objective 4.1  Maintain and improve existing facilities  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.1.a   Continue to implement existing plans, CIP, Master Plan,  and Life Cycle Replacement Programs.  TBD Staff Time Ongoing  4.1.b  Review existing plans, CIP, Master Plan, and Life Cycle  Replacement Programs and update as needed.  TBD Staff Time Ongoing  Objective 4.2:  Expand pathways and connectivity  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.2.a  Continue to implement existing Pathways Master Plan,  review annually, and make updates as needed.  $170,000 per  mile $0 Ongoing  Objective 3.1:  Increase year round recreational programming and activities  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  3.1.a  Continue to look for opportunities to expand indoor  recreational programs and activities.  $0 Staff Time Short‐Term  3.1.b  Continue to monitor recreational trends to stay current  with programming and demand.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  3.1.c   Continue to look for opportunities to expand programs  around working hours and commuting citizens.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  3.1.d  Explore increasing the number of program opportunities  for seniors, special needs, teens, and tweens.  $0 Staff Time Ongoing  3.1.e  Determine, attract, promote, and maintain a “signature”  event for the City. (Strategic Plan 5.B.1)  TBD Staff Time Ongoing  3.1.f  Set targets, identify gaps, and deploy programs,  activities, and events that provide family‐centered  recreational opportunities. (Strategic Plan 5.B.4)  TBD Staff Time Ongoing    118 City of Meridian, Idaho 4.2.b  Add fitness stations and family fun stations in  appropriate locations on pathways.  $100‐$150K per  park $0 Ongoing  Objective 4.3:  Add indoor recreation space  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.3.a  Continue to explore opportunities to add additional  indoor recreation space either through partnerships,  purchase of an existing facility or construction of a  Community Center or a Fieldhouse.  TBD TBD Short‐Term  4.3.b  Explore opportunities to add additional Community  Centers to newly planned elementary schools.  TBD TBD Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Objective 4.4:  Develop new amenities at new and existing parks based on level of service analysis  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.4.a  Look for opportunities to add parks and pathways in new  growth areas.  TBD TBD  Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  4.4.b  Look for opportunities to add new components at  existing parks where level of service is below threshold.  TBD TBD  Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  Objective 4.5:  Acquire new land for parks  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.5.a  Continue to find and purchase additional land for future  park development.  TBD Staff Time Mid to Long  Term  4.5.b  When considering new Parks, look where LOS is below  threshold.  TBD Staff Time Mid to Long  Term  Objective 4.6:  Improve parking at parks  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.6.a  Explore the need to improve and potentially add more  parking at appropriate parks and amenities.  TBD Staff Time Short to Mid  Term  4.6.b  Consider alternative transportation options to reduce  parking demand.  TBD Staff Time Short to Mid  Term    Parks and Recreation Master Plan 119 Objective 4.7:  Continue to improve ADA accessibility at all facilities  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.7.a  Develop and adopt an ADA Accessibility Transition Plan. TBD Staff Time  Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  4.7.b  Review and update the ADA Accessibility Transition  Plan every five years.  $0 Staff Time Short‐Term  Objective 4.8:  Upgrade comfort, convenience, and cultural amenities to existing facilities  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.8.a  Explore opportunities to add shade, storage, security  lighting, synthetic turf, etc. appropriately at existing  facilities.  TBD Staff Time  Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  4.8.b  Explore opportunities to work with the Parks and  Recreation Commission to create an individual identity  for each neighborhood park.  TBD Staff Time  Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  4.8.c  Explore opportunities to add public art appropriately at  existing facilities.  TBD Staff Time  Short‐Term  Mid‐Term  Long‐Term  Objective 4.9:  Add destination park amenities  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.9.a  Explore opportunities to add destination playground  and natural play areas with climbing features.  TBD Staff Time Short to Mid  Term  4.9.b  Foster development of Discovery Parks that uniquely  blend arts, entertainment, and culture. (Strategic Plan  5.A.4)  TBD Staff Time Short to Mid  Term  Objective 4.10:  Address current and future needs for athletic fields.  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.10.a  Explore opportunities to add both rectangle and  diamond athletic fields as use and demands warrant.  TBD TBD Short to Mid  Term    120 City of Meridian, Idaho 4.10.b  Where appropriate, add sports field lighting to new  facilities and improvements to lighting at existing  facilities.  TBD TBD Short to Mid  Term  4.10.c  Consider upgrading or adding synthetic turf fields as  use and demand for use of athletic field increases.  TBD TBD Short to Mid  Term  Objective 4.11:  Consider programming needs when adding new components to existing parks or when developing new parks  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.11.a  Continue to evaluate the programming needs of the  community when developing new parks or when  adding new components to existing parks.  TBD Staff Time Short to Mid  Term  Objective 4.12:  Monitor use, demands, and trends of recreation components  Actions Capital Cost  Estimate  Operational  Budget Impact  Timeframe to  Complete  4.12.a  Continue to monitor and evaluate the use, demands,  and trends in recreation amenities.  TBD TBD Short to Mid  Term       Community and Stakeholder Input Public process for the Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan was held January 26 – 28, 2015 and consisted of 125 participants in eight focus groups, eight stakeholder interviews, and a public forum. The community input summary is categorized below with brief details from the many focus group meetings. Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement The residents of Meridian benefit from a good geographic distribution of parks throughout the City, with some pockets of underserved areas. Participants embrace the fact that their parks form the heart of the community and feel like the programs offered are well run, diverse, affordable, and operated by dedicated employees, and, as such, indicate that they feel the quality of programs offered currently are very good. Participants also recognized that the parks are well maintained and have unique and innovative features. When asked about areas for improvement, participants identified the disconnected pathway system, the need for a larger indoor recreation facility, and the need to keep up with the city’s rapid growth as top priorities. Other general items, such as a perceived lack of parking, shade, field space for non-traditional sports, and off-leash dog areas were all identified as opportunities for improvement. Along with physical improvements, improvement of communication, and availability of information is also important to users. Satisfaction Residents are very satisfied with the programs, the quality of existing infrastructure, and maintenance. They also rated customer service and seeking community feedback as very good. Programming and Activities, and Locations Meridian residents love their programs and activities. They are very satisfied but do have an apparent demand for more year-round program offerings. Included among the additional programs are more offerings for seniors and teens, special events, performing arts, outdoor recreation and adventure programs, non-sports activities, and adaptive recreation. Two areas of the community were identified as being underserved, and may benefit from future park development. These were South and West Meridian. Certain demographics may also be underserved, including seniors and teens, as well as active adults and Millennials. New Facilities When asked for suggestions of new parks and recreation facilities in the City, participants identified: • Pathway connectivity • Fieldhouse/gym space • Parks in South and West Meridian • Additional athletic fields • Large community center • Exercise stations • Performing Arts Center • Iconic/Destination Parks Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -2- Values The City of Meridian residents value their parks and recreation system and feel like they get very good service from staff. Participants’ number one value was family-oriented programming and activities. They also want good communication about happenings and program offerings. Quality and affordable programming is a priority, while ensuring access to diverse offerings throughout the entire city. Providing a balance between passive and active recreation, as well as organized sports and unstructured activities, is very important to the community. Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -3- Focus Group Questions 1) How long have you been a resident of Meridian? <5 years: 9 5-9 years: 8 10-19 years: 24 20+ years: 12 Not a resident but use programs / facilities: 21 2) What are the strengths of the Parks and Recreation Department that should be continued over the next several years? • Partnerships****** • High Quality Programs (quality over quantity)**** • High Quality Parks**** • Park Maintenance***** • Parks well run and well maintained***** • Innovative Unique Parks* • Talented Forward Thinking Cooperative Staff*** • Flexibility responsive and adapt to change** • Safety & Security** • Variety/Diversity of Activities* • Ability to keep up with growth* • Number of Parks • Customer Service • Friendly Atmosphere • Teamwork • Technology • Family Oriented*** • Internal Expertise • Internal Support • Young Park System • Good geographic parks distribution • Keep developing open space into parks and activities • Responsive • Soliciting input and feedback from community • Community programs • Special Events • Commitment to Youth • Committed Leadership • Annual Investment in Infrastructure • Wise water use methodologies • Recycling Program • Availability of Land • Planning • Lots of open space Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -4- • Fishing Options • Parking • Playgrounds • Volunteers • Use funding well 3) Conversely, what are the major weaknesses that need to be addressed through the Parks and Recreation Master Plan? • Disconnected Pathway System****** • Lack of Parking at most parks during events*** • Lack of Communication- Internal and External (Marketing and Public Relations)*** • Lack of Facilities – open space, gymnasiums, ball fields, indoor classrooms, etc.*** • Growing Pains – Demand and Fast Growth** • Need more Youth Programs and Facilities* • Lack of Dedicated Funding to develop new facilities* • Lack of Open Field Ball Field Space for Diversity of Sports** • Lack of Funding** • Need a Large Recreation Center*** • No year round disc golf* • Lack of Off Leash Dog Parks** • Lack of Shade and Mature Trees in Parks** • Need indoor Aquatic Center* • Need more splash pads* • Need Indoor Performing Arts Center* • Lack of Security • Lack of Community Center Multipurpose Space for Community Organizations • Short on Staff • Lack of Capacity • Opportunities for future park land diminishing • Resting athletic field turf is challenging • Need Asset Replacement Plan – Life Cycle of Capital Replacement • Lack of quality of ball field lighting in parks • Lack of Dedicated use facilities • Need improved wayfinding signage and to trail connectivity • Need Developers Impact requirement for trail connectivity • Need more iconic parks (destination parks) • Need a larger downtown park • Need a Shade Policy for parks • Lack of winter water availability – restrooms, irrigation, drinking fountains, etc. • Traffic noise and shade around performance area in • Need to add a vapor policy to the non-smoking policy • Need better operational partnerships such as sharing school facilities • Need Comprehensive Plans with all City Departments • Poor maintenance of ball fields at Gordon Harris Park (school facilities) Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -5- • Over dependency on partnerships • Website needs ability for online registration and reservations • Need more seating in parks (shaded) • Need more non-bleacher seating at game fields • Rely of Volunteers 4) How satisfied are you with the quality of current programs offered? Why? 5 Excellent - 8 4 Very Good - 28 3 Good - 13 2 Fair - 0 1 Poor - 0 5) What additional programs or activities do you feel the Department should offer that are currently not available? • Non-sports Activities**** • Aquatic Programs – Swim Lessons, Water Aerobics, etc.*** • Teen Programs*** • Community-wide Special Events* • Senior Programs* • Pickleball** • Indoor Hockey* • Lacrosse* • Outdoor Recreation and Adventure Programs**** • Continuing Education Programs for all ages • Mobile Rec – Traveling Programs • Adaptive Recreation Programs • Activities for Millennials • Youth Sports • More Leagues • More Tournaments • Drop-in Programs – Gym, walking, workout, etc. • Indoor Field House Sports • Fishing / Fly Fishing – need more stocking, instruction • Expand recreational equipment rental system at concession stands • Improved Farmer’s Market • Art in the Park • Volunteer Maintenance Program – “Love Your Parks” • Winter Programs for Youth • Flag Football • Hunter Education Classes • Arts and Crafts Classes • Performing Arts Programs* Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -6- • Year round walking group 6) How satisfied are you with the overall quality of the existing park and recreation facilities provided by the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department? Why? 5 Excellent - 19 4 Very Good - 36 3 Good - 6 2 Fair - 1 1 Poor - 0 7) How would you rate the overall level of maintenance at the facilities owned or operated by the Department? Please identify the location and specifics of any maintenance concerns. 5 Excellent - 35 4 Very Good - 25 3 Good - 4 2 Fair - 0 1 Poor - 0 8) What improvements are needed at existing facilities? Where are these improvements needed? • More Parking***** • Shade in parks**** • Upgraded and Renovate Community Center*** • Upgrade lighting technology and modernization – timing, no bleed lights, etc.** • Better maintain and/or repurpose Legion Baseball Field into a Softball Field, re-grade, irrigation, lights, etc. – Storey Park** • Ballfield lights* • Pickleball markings on tennis courts* • Frost free drinking fountains, irrigation, restrooms, etc.* • Off leash dog areas in all parks* • Concession Opportunities - Upgrades • Parking at Settlers Park – Develop a Parking Plan • Beautify Pathways • Band Shell at Kleiner Park - Shade, Sound buffers, etc. • Replacement of Adventure Island Playground surfacing • Need more swings at parks • More Pathway connectivity • Air stations for bicycles in parks and on trails • Water bottle stations in parks and on trails • Healthy food and beverage options at concessions • Policy Signage in Parks – smoking, off lease dog areas (Kleiner Park), etc. • More dog pick-up bags stations in parks & trails • Electricity, Water and Sewer at Rodeo grounds • ADA Accessibility Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -7- • Conflict between neighborhood parks and sports events (parking, driving through neighborhoods, field designs, etc.) • Better Quality Water Fountains in Parks • Artificial / Synthetic Turf • Website – Online registration and reservations • Add restrooms at Settlers Park • More shaded seating in parks • More flowers and landscaping in parks • Add security systems • Flooding in Heroes Park • Heavy grass clippings in some parks • Renovate or repurpose the Community Center 9) Are there any portions of the community that are underserved? Please explain (i.e., where and what type of amenities are needed, what market segment needs more attention, etc.). • South Meridian******* • Dog Owners*** • Teens*** • Adventure Sports: Skateboarders, BMX • Adaptive – Special Needs** • Seniors / Active Adults** • Biking Community** • Youth Activities* • Aquatics – Swimmers* • Running Community • Cat Owners • Young Adults • Homeless • Competitive Club Soccer • Equestrian Community • New residents • Lacrosse Community • 10 mile and West • East of Eagle (Industrial) 10) What additional park and recreation facilities would you like to see the community provide? • Bike Pathway Connectivity***** • Athletic Fields**** • Fieldhouse including hard surface courts and indoor turf***** • Indoor Aquatic Center (competitive and family leisure)****** • Multipurpose Open Space to use for Athletic Fields**** • Dog Parks with water facilities to swim in & dog agility facility**** • Destination Softball Tournament Complex – 6 to 8 fields*** Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -8- • Destination Baseball Tournament Complex – 6 to 8 fields*** • Destination Multipurpose Rectangular Field Tournament Complex*** • Large Community Center*** • Botanical Gardens** • Splash pads*** • Indoor Tennis / Pickleball** • Ice Rink** • Pocket Parks, HOA parks* • Lacrosse Fields* • Exercise Fitness Trail* • Year Round Disc Golf Course* • Off leash dog areas** • Multipurpose Parks (Active and Passive) • Dedicated use facilities* • Performing Arts Center* • Natural Landscape Parks* • Multipurpose Artificial / Synthetic Turf with Lights* • Indoor Lacrosse (Box Lacrosse) • Farmer’s Market • Concessions • Art themed parks • Need more iconic parks (destination parks)* • Need a larger downtown park • Need a park on the West side • Nature Reserve* • Additional Community Gardening • Arboretum • Special Event Space with Large Outdoor Performance Space • Shade Structures • Historical and Cultural Park • Skate park** • Convention Center • Picnic Shelters • Picnic Areas • Outdoor Shooting Range • Sledding Hill on Southside • Children’s Working Farm • BMX • Fishing pond south of the highway • Climbing Wall, boulder area • Wi-Fi access at parks 11) Are there any facilities and/or programs currently available that should be eliminated? If so, which ones and why? Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -9- • Adult Baseball at Story Park* • Horseshoe Pits at Story Park • Community Center • Belly Dancing 12) How would you rate the quality of customer service provided by the Parks and Recreation staff? Please elaborate. 5 Excellent - 42 4 Very Good - 14 3 Good - 0 2 Fair - 0 1 Poor - 0 13) How effective is the Department in seeking feedback from the community and users on improving its performance? 5 Excellent - 23 4 Very Good - 23 3 Good - 2 Fair - 2 1 Poor - 0 14) The Parks and Recreation Department’s programs and facilities are currently funded through a combination of revenue sources, including General Fund, User Fees, Impact Fees, and Partnerships. Do you think this is an appropriate way to fund the department? Yes: 38 No: 2 Do Not Know: 14 15) Who are the key partners and stakeholders in the community with regards to assisting with the implementation of this plan? • School District****** • Youth Sports Organizations****** • YMCA***** • Boys & Girls Club**** • Senior Center** • Western Ada Recreation District – WARD** • Service Clubs – Optimist, Lions Club, etc.*** • Developers (including non-residential property)*** • Local Corporations / Business Community*** • Library* • Children’s Theater* • Irrigation Districts** • Transportation Agencies – ITD, MDC, Railroad, ACHD, COMPASS** • User Groups and Daily Users*** Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -10- • PAL* • Faith Based Community* • Boys/Girl Scouts* • Tax Paying Residents* • State and Local Governments (Idaho Fish and Game, adjacent municipalities)** • Foundations (Albertson’s) • Volunteers • Community Clubs • Meridian Arts Commission • Meridian Downtown Business Society • Regional Tennis Organizations • Medical Community – Health Care, St. Luke’s Hospital, Central District Health Department, etc. • Other City Departments* • City Council • Non-governmental Organizations • HOAs • Land Owners* • Speedway Owner 16) What are the key issues and values in the Meridian community that need to be considered while developing this Master Plan? • Family Oriented******* • Safety*** • Accessibility*** • Sustainability*** • Quality** • Aesthetics** • Connectivity** • Fiscally Responsible* • Develop in underserved areas* • Traffic / Drive Time* • Community • User Friendly • Fun • Affordability • Identity • Active Lifestyles** • Partnerships* • Suburban Design • Civic Minded • Inclusive • Leadership • Balance Active and Passive Activities • Balance organized sports and unorganized sports activities Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -11- • Growth • Land Value • Air Quality • Historical & Cultural connection to farming and dairy • Convenience • Value of outdoor recreation* • Economic Impact Value • Key Identity for each park • Destination amenities 17) Are there any political sensitivities we should be aware of that could impact the success of the city’s planning efforts? • Conservative - Do not raise taxes***** • Fiscal Responsibility and Accountability** • Government cannot fund and/or operate everything • City of Meridian is not going to build Indoor Aquatic Center, Ice Rink, Performing Arts Center, • Moore Brooks Legion Baseball Field Renovation • Rodeo Grounds • Trying to please all residents • Sharing the open process to public • City Council Support for Parks & Recreation • Open Information Sharing of Future Needs • Residents want it all but do not want to pay for it • Educate public on benefits of new facilities • Parks and Facilities West of 10 Mile • Changing political landscape – elections • Impacts to our providers* • Diversity of the community • Neighboring factors 18) During the next 5-10 years, what are the top priorities for the Parks and Recreation Department? 1-5 years • Land Acquisition***** • Pathway Connectivity**** • Recreation Center*** • Gymnasium Space** • Field House**** • Outdoor Rectangular Field space** • Outdoor Diamond Field space** • Partner better with school facilities* • Regional Park in South Meridian** • New Dog Park** Focus Group Questions Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan -12- • New Neighborhood Parks in CIP* • Increase Development Impact Fee Policy In Lieu Of for Land Acquisition Endowment Fund* • Maximize use of existing facilities**** • Implement Master Plan* • More public space South of Interstate* • Staffing Plans • Outdoor Spaces • Pickleball Courts* • Equipment to maintain new park amenities • Life Cycle Plans* • Upgrade Ball field Lighting • Upgrade Story Park • City Christmas Tree • Shade Policy • Funding Sources* • Public Relations and Marketing • Endowment for park maintenance (1%) with donation of land • Sell the Quality of Life message to the public • Focus on the priorities • Create a position to solicit grants, sponsorships, private donations, etc. • Develop West of 10 mile • Upgrade Landscaping* • Outdoor Recreation and Adventure Trips 10 Years • Pathway Connectivity** • Outdoor Rectangular Field space* • Outdoor Diamond Field space* • Indoor Recreational Space • Implement Master Plan • Increase in Staff • Increase Partnerships* • Additional Parking • Develop undeveloped parks • Aldape Park • Forestry Upgrade • New Neighborhood Parks in CIP • Two new dog Parks • Botanical Gardens • Indoor Aquatic Center • Additional park in South Meridian and North West Meridian, Idaho Parks & Recreation Final Inventory Atlas March 2015 Parks, Open Space, and Trails GRASP® Atlas Inventory Process and Scoring Information This inventory was completed in a series of steps. The planning team first prepared a preliminary list of existing components using information provided by the client as well as aerial photography and the client Geographic Information System (GIS) data. All components identified were given GIS points and names. Next, field visits were conducted by the consulting team to confirm the preliminary data and collect additional information. During the field visits and evaluations, missing components were added to the data set, and each component was evaluated as to how well it met expectations for its intended function. During the site visits the following information was collected: x Component type x Component location x Evaluation of component condition - record of comfort and convenience features x Evaluation of comfort and convenience features x Evaluation of park design and ambience x Site photos x General comments The inventory team used the following three-tier rating system to evaluate each component: 1 = Below Expectations 2 = Meets Expectations 3 = Exceeds Expectations Scores were based on such things as the condition of the component, its size, or capacity relative to the need at that location, and its overall quality. Components were evaluated from two perspectives: first, the value of the component in serving the immediate neighborhood, and second, its value to the entire community. The setting for a component and the conditions around it affect how well it functions, so in addition to scoring the components, each park site or indoor facility was given a set of scores to rate its comfort, convenience, and ambient qualities. This includes such things as the availability of restrooms, drinking water, shade, scenery, etc. Information collected during the site visit was then compiled and corrections and comparisons made to GIS. Meridian, Idaho Parks &Recreation Final Inventory Atlas March 2015 Indoor Inventory: City of Meridian De s i g n C o n c e p t s Co m p o n e n t CO M P O N E N T , D E F I N I T I O N , A N D T Y P I C A L A R C H I T E C T U R A L E L E M E N T S Ar t s a n d C r a f t s Ar t s a n d C r a f t s - n o n - c a r p e t e d f l o o r w i t h b u i l t - i n s t o r a g e a n d a s i n k , o f t e n a d j a c e n t t o a k i l n r o o m Au d i t o r i u m / T h e a t e r Au d i t o r i u m / T h e a t e r - d e s i g n e d s p e c i f i c a l l y f o r a p e r f o r m a n c e / l e c t u r e s p a c e ; b u i l t - i n s t a g e , s e a t i n g , a n d c a n a c c o m m o d a t e st a g e l i g h t i n g a n d s o u n d Ch i l d c a r e / P r e s c h o o l bu i l t i n s e c u r e e n t r y a n d c a b i n e t s , r o o m w i t h s m a l l t o i l e t , d e s i g n a t e d o u t d o o r p l a y a r e a , e t c . Cl i m b i n g W a l l Cl i m b i n g W a l l - s p e c i a l d e s i g n f o r c l i m b i n g , i n c l u d e s h a r n e s s a n d s a f e t y f l o o r i n g s y s t e m Fi t n e s s / D a n c e Fi t n e s s / D a n c e - r e s i l i e n t f l o o r i n g , m i r r o r s Fo o d - C a f é / C o n c e s s i o n s St a f f e d f o o d s e r v i c e w i t h c o m m e r c i a l k i t c h e n - i n f o r m a l ( n o d i n i n g r o o m o r w a i t e r s e r v i c e s ) Fo o d - F u l l S e r v i c e St a f f e d f o o d s e r v i c e w i t h c o m m e r c i a l k i t c h e n a n d d i n i n g r o o m / w a i t e r s e r v i c e s Fo o d - V e n d i n g No n - s t a f f e d a r e a w i t h v e n d i n g m a c h i n e s a n d / o r s e l f - s e r v i c e Ga l l e r y Ga l l e r y - a d e q u a t e l i g h t i n g , o p e n w a l l s p a c e w i t h r o o m f o r c i r c u l a t i o n G y mn a s i u m Gy m n a s i u m - l a r g e s p a c e t h a t c a n a c c o m m o d a t e b a s k e t b a l l , v o l l e y b a l l , o r o t h e r i n d o o r c o u r t s p o r t s In d o o r I c e Ic e a r e n a u s e d f o r h o c k e y o r o t h e r i c e s p o r t s Te n n i s , I n d o o r In d o o r T e n n i s C o u r t s Tr a c k - I n d o o r In d o o r T r a c k - c o u r s e w i t h p a i n t e d l a n e s , b a n k e d c o r n e r s , r e s i l i e n t s u r f a c e , a n d m a r k e d d i s t a n c e s Ki t c h e n - K i t c h e n e t t e Ar e a f o r p r e p a r i n g f o o d , w a r m i n g , o r s e r v i n g Ki t c h e n - C o m m e r c i a l Ki t c h e n t h a t m e e t s l o c a l c o d e s f o r c o m m e r c i a l p r e p a r a t i o n a n d s e r v i c e o f f o o d Lo b b y /E n t r y wa y Wa i t i n g a n d s i t t i n g a r e a a t t h e e n t r y Mu l t i - p u r p o s e Mu l t i - p u r p o s e - a n y r o o m t h a t c a n h o s t a v a r i e t y o f a c t i v i t i e s i n c l u d i n g : c l a s s r o o m , m e e t i n g r o o m , b a n q u e t r o o m e t c . m a y b e be d i v i d a b l e - s e e l i s t b e l o w f o r c o m m o n u s e s Pa t i o / o u t d o o r s e a t i n g Ou t d o o r s p a c e o r s e a t i n g a r e a t h a t i s d e s i g n e d t o b e u s e d e x c l u s i v e l y i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h a n i n d o o r s p a c e a n d h a s p r i m a r y ac c e s s t h r o u g h a n i n d o o r s p a c e . Po o l , L a p Po o l , L a p - p o o l a p p r o p r i a t e f o r s w i m m i n g l a p s Po o l , L e i s u r e Po o l , L e i s u r e - d e s i g n e d f o r l e i s u r e w a t e r a c t i v i t i e s , m a y i n c l u d e z e r o - d e p t h e n t r y , s l i d e s a n d s p r a y f e a t u r e s Po o l , T h e r a py Po o l , T h e r a p y - w a r m w a t e r p o o l u s e d f o r r e h a b i l i t a t i o n a n d t h e r a p y Re t a i l / P r o - s h o p Ar e a f o r r e t a i l s a l e s o f p r o d u c e s a l e s , s p o r t i n g e q u i p m e n t , g i f t s , e t c . U s u a l l y h a d w i t h d i r e c t a c c e s s t o o u t s i d e a n d c a n b e lo c k e d s e p a r a t l y f r o m t h e r e s t o f t h e f a c i l i t y Ra c q ue t b a l l Ra c q u e t b a l l - r e g u l a t i o n c o u r t s Sa u n a / s t e a m Sa u n a / s t e a m - b u i l t - i n s e a t i n g a n d h e a t s o u r c e , m a y b e s t e a m o r d r y h e a t S p ec i a l t y S e r v i c e s Sp e c i a l t y S e r v i c e s - f o r e x a m p l e - v i s i t i n g n u r s e S p ec i a l t y T r a i n i n g Sp e c i a l t y T r a i n i n g - f o r e x a m p l e - b o x i n g , g y m n a s t i c s , c i r c u i t t r a i n i n g We i g h t / C a r d i o E q u i p m e n t We i g h t / C a r d i o E q u i p m e n t - r e s i l i e n t o r a n t i - b a c t e r i a l f l o o r i n g , a d e q u a t e v e n t i l a t i o n a n d c e i l i n g h e i g h t s a p p r o p r i a t e f o r we i g h t a n d c a r d i o e q u i p m e n t Wo o d s h o p Wo o d s h o p - c o n t a i n s a d e q u a t e p o w e r s u p p l y a n d v e n t i l a t i o n f o r w o o d - w o r k i n g e q u i p m e n t Ty p i c a l M u l t i - p u r p o s e r o o m U S E S Cl a s s e s , e v e n t s , e t c . Fi r s t a i d r o o m Ga m e R o o m Li b r a r y Lo u n g e Lo u n g e , S e n i o r Lo u n g e , Y o u t h Ma s s a g e r o o m In d o o r C o m p o n e n t s GRASP® Atlas City Hall 2 2 general multi purpose rooms/conference rooms Inventory Date: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores 21.6 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 3 Design and AmbianceSite Access 2Aesthetics 3Entry 3Entry Aesthetics 3Building Condition 3Entry Desk 3Office Space 2Overall Storage 3Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Gallery 2 2 currently holding museum type pieces Multi-purpose 1 2 large room that can be divided into rooms A and B GRASP® Atlas Meridian Community Center 2 in need of updates and renovation throughout Inventory Date: Meridian ParksOwner: Modifiers with Scores 3.6 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 1 Design and AmbianceSite Access 1Aesthetics 1Entry 1Entry Aesthetics 1Building Condition 1Entry Desk 2Office Space 2Overall Storage 2Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Multi-purpose 1 2 main room, large desk area really cuts down on function of room Multi-purpose 1 1 smaller room with sink GRASP® Atlas Meridian Senior Center 2 very nice facility with views to park and adjacent pond. available for rentals Inventory Date: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores 81.9 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 3 Design and AmbianceSite Access 3Aesthetics 3Entry 3Entry Aesthetics 3Building Condition 2Entry Desk 3Office Space 3Overall Storage 3Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Retail / Pro-shop 1 2 gift shop Multi-purpose 1 2 library Multi-purpose 1 2 small card room off pool table area Multi-purpose 1 2 pool table area Multi-purpose 1 3 with sink Gallery 1 2 art displayed on corridor between the two bigger multi-purpose room Patio / Outdoor seating 1 2 views to park Kitchen - Kitchenette 1 3 full commercial kitchen adjacent to large room Multi-purpose 1 3 great room with stage and adjacent kitchen THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Meridian, Idaho Parks &Recreation Final Inventory Atlas March 2015 Indoor Inventory: School Properties GRASP® Atlas Cole Valley Christian School 2 Inventory Date: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores 7.2 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceSite Access 2Aesthetics 2Entry 2Entry Aesthetics 2Building Condition 2Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 2Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Gymnasium 1 3 south gym Gymnasium 1 3 north gym GRASP® Atlas Heritage Middle School 2 Inventory Date: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores 2.4 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceSite Access 2Aesthetics 2Entry 2Entry Aesthetics 2Building Condition 2Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 2Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Gymnasium 1 2 practice gym with room for basketball GRASP® Atlas Meridian Academy 2 Inventory Date: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores 1.2 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceSite Access 2Aesthetics 2Entry 2Entry Aesthetics 2Building Condition 2Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 2Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Gymnasium 1 1 small GRASP® Atlas Meridian Middle School 2 Inventory Date: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores 2.4 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceSite Access 2Aesthetics 2Entry 2Entry Aesthetics 2Building Condition 2Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 2Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Gymnasium 1 2 Wes Lowe Gym, room for basketball GRASP® Atlas Paramount Elementary School 2 Inventory Date: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores 1.2 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceSite Access 2Aesthetics 2Entry 2Entry Aesthetics 2Building Condition 2Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 2Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Gymnasium 1 1 small GRASP® Atlas Willow Creek Elementary School 2 Inventory Date: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores 2.4 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceSite Access 2Aesthetics 2Entry 2Entry Aesthetics 2Building Condition 2Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 2Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Gymnasium 1 2 volleyball only THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Meridian, Idaho Parks &Recreation Final Inventory Atlas March 2015 Indoor Inventory: Other Providers GRASP® Atlas YMCA Homecourt 2 Inventory Date: YMCAOwner: Modifiers with Scores 14.4 Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceSite Access 2Aesthetics 2Entry 2Entry Aesthetics 2Building Condition 2Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 2Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score Component Quantity Dimensions Indoor Score Comments Gymnasium 4 3 very limited use Meridian, Idaho Parks &Recreation Final Inventory Atlas March 2015 Other Indoor Locations* *Indoor facilities in this section only located for reference, not scored or analyzed. GRASP® Atlas Boys and Girls Club 0 Located but not scored Inventory Date: OtherOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 0 Design and AmbianceSite Access 0Aesthetics 0Entry 0Entry Aesthetics 0Building Condition 0Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 0Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score GRASP® Atlas Chamber of Commerce 0 Located but not scored Inventory Date: OtherOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 0 Design and AmbianceSite Access 0Aesthetics 0Entry 0Entry Aesthetics 0Building Condition 0Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 0Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score GRASP® Atlas Golf Course Club House 0 Located but not scored Inventory Date: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 0 Design and AmbianceSite Access 0Aesthetics 0Entry 0Entry Aesthetics 0Building Condition 0Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 0Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score GRASP® Atlas Meridian Library 0 Located but not scored Inventory Date: Library DistrictOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Indoor GRASP® Score Updated: General Comments 0 Design and AmbianceSite Access 0Aesthetics 0Entry 0Entry Aesthetics 0Building Condition 0Entry Desk 0Office Space 0Overall Storage 0Restrooms 0Locker Rooms Components with Score THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Meridian, Idaho Parks &Recreation Final Inventory Atlas March 2015 Outdoor Inventory: City of Meridian De s i g n C o n c e p t s Co m p o n e n t C O M P O N E N T A N D D E F I N I T I O N Am u s e m e n t R i d e A m u s e m e n t R i d e - T r a i n , g o c a r t s , e t c . Aq u a F e a t , P o o l A q u a t i c f e a t u r e , P o o l ( O u t d o o r P o o l ) – C o n s i s t s o f a s i n g l e l a p p o o l . h a s r e s t r i c t e d a c c e s s a n d l i f e g u a r d s . Aq u a F e a t , S p r a y A q u a t i c f e a t u r e , S p r a y ( D e s t i n a t i o n S p r a y g r o u n d ) – C o n s i s t s o f m a n y a n d v a r i e d s p r a y f e a t u r e s . D o e s n o t h a v e s t an d i n g w a t e r , b u t i s l a r g e a n d v a r i e d en o u g h t o a t t r a c t u s e r s f r o m o u t s i d e t h e i m m e d i a t e n e i g h b o r h o o d . Aq u a F e a t , C o m p l e x A q u a t i c f e a t u r e , C o m p l e x ( A q u a t i c P a r k ) – A f a c i l i t y t h a t h a s a t l e a s t o n e l a p p o o l a n d o n e s e p a r a t e s p r a y g r ou n d o r f e a t u r e . Ar c h e r y R a n g e A r c h e r y R a n g e – A d e s i g n a t e d a r e a f o r p r a c t i c e a n d / o r c o m p e t i t i v e a r c h e r y a c t i v i t i e s . M e e t s s a f e t y r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d h a s a p p r o p r i a t e t a r g e t s a n d sh e l t e r s . Ba c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e – D e s c r i b e s a n y s i z e o f g r a s s y a r e a w i t h a p r a c t i c e b a c k s t o p , u s e d f o r p r a c t i c e o r p e e - w e e g a m e s . Ba l l f i e l d B a l l f i e l d – D e s c r i b e s s o f t b a l l a n d b a s e b a l l f i e l d s o f a l l k i n d s . N o t s p e c i f i c t o s i z e o r a g e - a p p r o p r i a t e n e s s . Ba l l f i e l d , C o m p l e x B a l l f i e l d , C o m p l e x - 4 o r m o r e b a l l f i e l d s o f s i m i l a r s i z e i n u s e d f o r t o u r n a m e n t s . Ba s k e t b a l l B a s k e t b a l l – D e s c r i b e s a s t a n d - a l o n e f u l l s i z e d o u t d o o r c o u r t w i t h t w o g o a l s . H a l f c o u r t s s c o r e d a s ( . 5 ) . N o t c o u n t e d i f i n c l u d e d i n M u l t i u s e C o u r t . Ba t t i n g C a g e B a t t i n g C a g e – A s t a n d - a l o n e f a c i l i t y t h a t h a s p i t c h i n g m a c h i n e s a n d r e s t r i c t e d e n t r y . Bl u e w a y B l u e w a y – R i v e r , S t r e a m o r c a n a l , t h a t i s u s e d f o r a q u a t i c r e c r e a t i o n . BM X C o u r s e B M X C o u r s e – A d e s i g n a t e d a r e a f o r n o n - m o t o r i z e d B i c y c l e M o t o c r o s s . C a n b e c o n s t r u c t e d o f c o n c r e t e o r c o m p a c t e d e a r t h . Bo c c e B a l l B o c c e B a l l - O u t d o o r c o u r t s d e s i g n e d f o r b o c c e b a l l . C o u n t e d p e r c o u r t . Co n c e s s i o n s C o n c e s s i o n s - A s e p a r a t e s t r u c t u r e u s e d f o r t h e s e l l i n g o f c o n c e s s i o n s a t b a l l f i e l d s , p o o l s , e t c . Co n c e s s i o n s w i t h R e s t r o o m C o n c e s s i o n s w i t h R e s t r o o m - A s e p a r a t e s t r u c t u r e u s e d f o r t h e s e l l i n g o f c o n c e s s i o n s a t b a l l f i e l d s , p o ol s , e t c . w i t h r e s t r o o m f a c i i l t y i n c l u d e d . Di s k G o l f D i s k G o l f – D e s c r i b e s a d e s i g n a t e d a r e a t h a t i s u s e d f o r d i s k g o l f . I n c l u d e s p e r m a n e n t b a s k e t g o a l s a n d t e e s . S c o r e d p er 1 8 h o l e s . Do g P a r k D o g P a r k – A l s o k n o w n a s “ a p a r k f o r p e o p l e w i t h d o g s ” o r “ c a n i n e o f f - l e a s h a r e a ” . A n a r e a d e s i g n e d s p e c i f i c a l l y a s a n of f - l e a s h a r e a f o r d o g s a n d th e i r g u a r d i a n s . Dr i v i n g R a n g e D r i v i n g R a n g e - A n a r e a d e s i g n a t e d f o r g o l f p r a c t i c e o r l e s s o n s . Ed u c a t i o n a l E x p e r i e n c e E d u c a t i o n a l E x p e r i e n c e - S i g n s , s t r u c t u r e s o r h i s t o r i c f e a t u r e s t h a t p r o v i d e a n e d u c a t i o n a l , c u l t u r a l o r hi s t o r i c e x p e r i e n c e . Eq u e s t r i a n F a c i l i t i e s E q u e s t r i a n F a c i l i t i e s - d e s i g n e d a r e a f o r e q u e s t r i a n u s e . Ev e n t S p a c e E v e n t S p a c e - A d e s i g n a t e d a r e a o r f a c i l i t y f o r o u t d o o r p e r f o r m a n c e s , c l a s s r o o m s o r s p e c i a l e v e n t s , i n c l u d i n g a m p h i t he a t e r s , b a n d s h e l l , s t a g e s , e t c . Fi t n e s s C o u r s e F i t n e s s c o u r s e – C o n s i s t s o f a n o u t d o o r p a t h t h a t c o n t a i n s s t a t i o n s t h a t p r o v i d e i n s t r u c t i o n s a n d b a s i c e q u i p m e n t f o r s t r e n g t h t r a i n i n g . Ga r d e n , C o m m u n i t y G a r d e n , C o m m u n i t y ( v e g e t a b l e ) – D e s c r i b e s a n y g a r d e n a r e a t h a t p r o v i d e s c o m m u n i t y m e m b e r s a p l a c e t o h a v e p e r s on a l v e g e t a b l e / f l o w e r g a r d e n s . Ga r d e n , D i s p l a y G a r d e n , D i s p l a y – D e s c r i b e s a n y g a r d e n a r e a t h a t i s d e s i g n e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d t o p r o v i d e a f o c a l p o i n t i n a p a r k . Ex a m p l e s i n c l u d e : r o s e g a r d e n , f e r n ga r d e n , n a t i v e p l a n t g a r d e n , w i l d l i f e g a r d e n , a r b o r e t u m , e t c . Go l f G o l f – C o u n t e d p e r 1 8 h o l e s . ( 1 8 h o l e c o u r s e = 1 a n d 9 h o l e c o u r s e = . 5 ) Ha n d b a l l H a n d b a l l – O u t d o o r c o u r t s d e s i g n e d f o r h a n d b a l l . Ho c k e y , I n l i n e H o c k e y , I n - l i n e - R e g u l a t i o n s i z e o u t d o o r r i n k b u i l t s p e c i f i c a l l y f o r l e a g u e i n - l i n e h o c k e y g a m e s a n d p r a c t i c e . Ho c k e y , I c e H o c k e y , I c e – R e g u l a t i o n s i z e o u t d o o r r i n k b u i l t s p e c i f i c a l l y f o r l e a g u e i c e h o c k e y g a m e s a n d p r a c t i c e . Ho r s e s h o e s H o r s e s h o e s – A d e s i g n a t e d a r e a f o r t h e g a m e o f h o r s e s h o e s . I n c l u d i n g p e r m a n e n t p i t s o f r e g u l a t i o n l e n g t h . C o u n t e d p e r c o u r t . Ho r s e s h o e s , C o m p l e x H o r s e s h o e s , C o m p l e x - S e v e r a l r e g u l a t i o n c o u r t s i n s i n g l e l o c a t i o n u s e d f o r t o u r n a m e n t s . Lo o p W a l k L o o p W a l k – A n y s i d e w a l k o r p a t h t h a t i s c o n f i g u r e d t o m a k e a c o m p l e t e l o o p a r o u n d a p a r k o r f e a t u r e a n d t h a t i s s i z e a bl e e n o u g h t o u s e a s a ex e r c i s e r o u t e ( m i n . ¼ m i l e - 1 3 2 0 f t . - i n l e n g t h ) Mi n i a t u r e G o l f M i n i a t u r e G o l f - O u t d o o r m i n i a t u r e g o l f c o u r s e . MP F i e l d , S m a l l M u l t i - p u r p o s e f i e l d , S m a l l – D e s c r i b e s a s p e c i f i c f i e l d l a r g e e n o u g h t o h o s t a t l e a s t o n e y o u t h f i e l d s p o r t g a m e . M i n i m u m f i e l d s i z e i s 4 5 ’ x 9 0 ’ ( 1 5 x 3 0 ya r d s ) . P o s s i b l e s p o r t s m a y i n c l u d e , b u t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o : s o c c e r , f o o t b a l l , l a c r o s s e , r u g b y , a n d f i e l d 1 h o c k e y . F i e l d m a y h av e g o a l s a n d l i n i n g sp e c i f i c t o a c e r t a i n s p o r t t h a t m a y c h a n g e w i t h p e r m i t t e d u s e . N e i g h b o r h o o d o r c o m m u n i t y c o m p o n e n t MP F i e l d , M e d i u m M u l t i - p u r p o s e f i e l d , M e d i u m - D e s c r i b e s a s p e c i f i c f i e l d l a r g e e n o u g h t o h o s t a t l e a s t o n e y o u t h / a d u l t f i e l d s p or t g a m e . M i n i m u m f i e l d s i z e i s 9 0 ’ x 1 8 0 ’ (3 0 x 6 0 y a r d s ) . P o s s i b l e s p o r t s m a y i n c l u d e , b u t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o : s o c c e r , f o o t b a l l , l a c r o s s e , r u g b y , a n d f i e l d 1 h o c k e y . F i el d m a y h a v e g o a l s a n d li n i n g s p e c i f i c t o a c e r t a i n s p o r t t h a t m a y c h a n g e w i t h p e r m i t t e d u s e . U s e d w i t h M P F i e l d C o m p l e x c o m p o n e n t o n l y . MP F i e l d , L a r g e M u l t i - p u r p o s e f i e l d , L a r g e – D e s c r i b e s a s p e c i f i c f i e l d l a r g e e n o u g h t o h o s t a t l e a s t o n e a d u l t f i e l d s p o r t g a m e . M i n i m u m f i e l d s i z e i s 1 8 0 ’ x 3 0 0 ’ ( 6 0 x 10 0 y a r d s ) . P o s s i b l e s p o r t s m a y i n c l u d e , b u t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o : s o c c e r , f o o t b a l l , l a c r o s s e , r u g b y , a n d f i e l d h o c k e y . F i e l d m a y h a v e g o a l s a n d l i n i n g sp e c i f i c t o a c e r t a i n s p o r t t h a t m a y c h a n g e w i t h p e r m i t t e d u s e . N e i g h b o r h o o d o r c o m m u n i t y c o m p o n e n t MP F i e l d , M u l t i p l e M u l t i - p u r p o s e f i e l d , M u l t i p l e – D e s c r i b e s a n a r e a l a r g e e n o u g h t o h o s t a m i n i m u m o f o n e a d u l t g a m e a n d o n e y o ut h g a m e s i m u l t a n e o u s l y . T h i s ca t e g o r y d e s c r i b e s a l a r g e o p e n g r a s s y a r e a t h a t c a n b e a r r a n g e d i n a n y m a n n e r o f c o n f i g u r a t i o n s f o r a n y n u m b e r o f f i e l d s p o r t s . M i n i m u m f i e l d s i z e i s 22 4 ’ x 4 6 8 ’ ( 7 5 x 1 5 6 y a r d s ) . P o s s i b l e s p o r t s m a y i n c l u d e , b u t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o : s o c c e r , f o o t b a l l , l a c r o s s e , r u g b y , a n d f i e ld h o c k e y . F i e l d m a y h a v e go a l s a n d l i n i n g s p e c i f i c t o a c e r t a i n s p o r t t h a t m a y c h a n g e w i t h p e r m i t t e d u s e . N e i g h b o r h o o d o r c o m m u n i t y c o m p o n e n t MP F i e l d , C o m p l e x M P F i e l d , C o m p l e x - S e v e r a l f i e l d s i n s i n g l e l o c a t i o n u s e d f o r t o u r n a m e n t s Ou t d o o r C o m p o n e n t L i s t De s i g n C o n c e p t s Co m p o n e n t C O M P O N E N T A N D D E F I N I T I O N Ou t d o o r C o m p o n e n t L i s t Mu l t i u s e C o u r t M u l t i u s e C o u r t - A p a v e d a r e a t h a t i s p a i n t e d w i t h g a m e s s u c h a s h o p s c o t c h , 4 s q u a r e , b a s k e t b a l l , e t c . O f t e n f o u nd i n s c h o o l y a r d s . N o t e t h e q u a n t i t y of b a s k e t b a l l h o o p s i n c o m m e n t s e c t i o n . Na t u r a l A r e a N a t u r a l a r e a – A n a r e a w i t h i n d e s i g n a t e d o p e n s p a c e o r a p o r t i o n o f p a r k l a n d t h a t c o n t a i n s o p e n s p a c e c h a r a c t e r i s t ic s s u c h a s n a t i v e v e g e t a t i o n , wi l d l i f e h a b i t a t , a g r i c u l t u r a l l a n d , o r o t h e r v a l u e s t h a t a r e t y p i c a l o f o p e n s p a c e i n t h e r e g i o n . No r d i c / S k i A r e a D e s i g n a t e d a r e a s p e c i f i c a l l y f o r s k i i i n g , c r o s s - c o u n t r y , o r o t h e r w i n t e r s p o r t s . Op e n T u r f O p e n T u r f – A g r a s s y a r e a t h a t i s n o t s u i t a b l e f o r p r o g r a m m e d f i e l d s p o r t s d u e t o s i z e , s l o p e , l o c a t i o n o r p h y s i c a l o b st r u c t i o n s . P r i m a r y u s e s i n c l u d e wa l k i n g , p i c n i c k i n g , F r i s b e e , a n d o t h e r i n f o r m a l p l a y a n d u s e s t h a t r e q u i r e a n o p e n g r a s s y a r e a . Op e n W a t e r O p e n W a t e r – A b o d y o f w a t e r s u c h a s a p o n d , s t r e a m , r i v e r , w e t l a n d w i t h o p e n w a t e r , l a k e , o r r e s e r v o i r . Ot h e r - A c t i v e A c t i v e c o m p o n e n t t h a t d o e s n o t f a l l u n d e r a n y o t h e r c o m p o n e n t d e f i n i t i o n . I f p a s s i v e , c o n s i d e r p a s s i v e n o d e . Pa s s i v e N o d e P a s s i v e N o d e - A p l a c e t h a t i s d e s i g n e d t o c r e a t e a p a u s e o r s p e c i a l f o c u s w i t h i n a p a r k , i n c l u d e s s e a t i n g a r e a s , p as s i v e a r e a s , p l a z a s , o v e r l o o k s , e t c . Pi c n i c G r o u n d s P i c n i c G r o u n d s - A d e s i g n a t e d a r e a w i t h s e v e r a l , s e p a r a t e p i c n i c t a b l e s . Pl a y g r o u n d , D e s t i n a t i o n P l a y g r o u n d - D e s t i n a t i o n – P l a y g r o u n d t h a t s e r v e s a s a d e s t i n a t i o n f o r f a m i l i e s f r o m t h e e n t i r e c o m m u n i t y, h a s r e s t r o o m s a n d p a r k i n g o n - s i t e . M a y in c l u d e s p e c i a l f e a t u r e s l i k e a c l i m b i n g w a l l , s p r a y f e a t u r e , o r a d v e n t u r e p l a y . Pl a y g r o u n d , L o c a l P l a y g r o u n d - l o c a l – P l a y g r o u n d t h a t i s i n t e n d e d t o s e r v e t h e n e e d s o f t h e s u r r o u n d i n g n e i g h b o r h o o d . G e n e r a l l y d oe s n ’ t h a v e r e s t r o o m s o r o n - s i t e pa r k i n g . Pu b l i c A r t P u b l i c A r t – A n y a r t i n s t a l l a t i o n o n p u b l i c p r o p e r t y . Ra c q u e t b a l l R a c q u e t b a l l – O u t d o o r c o u r t s d e s i g n e d f o r r a c q u e t b a l l . Re s t r o o m R e s t r o o m - A s e p a r a t e s t r u c t u r e t h a t m a y o r m a y n o t h a v e p l u m b i n g . D o e s n o t r e c e i v e a n e i g h b o r h o o d o r c o m m u n i t y s c o r e . T h i s i s s c o r e d i n t h e Co m f o r t a n d C o n v e n i e n c e s e c t i o n . Ro p e s C o u r s e R o p e s C o u r s e - A n a r e a d e s i g n e d f o r r o p e c l i m b i n g , s w i n g i n g , e t c . Sh e l t e r , G r o u p S h e l t e r – L a r g e / G r o u p – A s h a d e s h e l t e r w i t h p i c n i c t a b l e s , l a r g e e n o u g h t o a c c o m m o d a t e a g r o u p p i c n i c o r o t h e r e v en t f o r a t l e a s t 2 5 p e r s o n s w i t h se a t i n g f o r a m i n i m u m o f 1 2 . Sh e l t e r , S h a d e S h e l t e r – S h a d e – A s h a d e s h e l t e r w i t h s e a t i n g b u t w i t h o u t p i c n i c t a b l e s . S e a t i n g u p t o 4 p e o p l e . Sh e l t e r S h e l t e r – S m a l l / I n d i v i d u a l – A s h a d e s h e l t e r w i t h p i c n i c t a b l e s , l a r g e e n o u g h t o a c c o m m o d a t e a f a m i l y p i c n i c o r o t h e r e v e nt f o r a p p r o x i m a t e l y 4 - 1 2 pe r s o n s w i t h s e a t i n g f o r a m i n i m u m o f 4 . Sh o o t i n g R a n g e S h o o t i n g R a n g e – A d e s i g n a t e d a r e a f o r p r a c t i c e a n d c o m p e t i t i v e f i r e a r m s s h o o t i n g a c t i v i t i e s . M e e t s s a f e t y r e q u i r e me n t s a n d h a s a p p r o p r i a t e t a r g e t s an d s h e l t e r s . Sh u f f l e b o a r d S h u f f l e b o a r d - O u t d o o r c o u r t s d e s i g n e d f o r s h u f f l e b o a r d . Sk a t e F e a t u r e S k a t e F e a t u r e – A s t a n d - a l o n e f e a t u r e i n a p a r k . M a y b e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h a p l a y g r o u n d b u t i s n o t c o n s i d e r e d a p a r t of i t . Sk a t e P a r k S k a t e p a r k – A n a r e a s e t a s i d e s p e c i f i c a l l y f o r s k a t e b o a r d i n g , i n - l i n e s k a t i n g , o r f r e e - s t y l e b i k i n g . M a y b e s p e c i f i c t o o n e u s e r g r o u p o r a l l o w f o r s e v e r a l us e r t y p e s . C a n a c c o m m o d a t e m u l t i p l e u s e r s o f v a r y i n g a b i l i t i e s . U s u a l l y h a s a v a r i e t y o f c o n c r e t e f e a t u r e s a n d h a s a c o m m u n i t y d r a w . Sl e d d i n g H i l l S l e d d i n g H i l l - A n a r e a d e s i g n a t e d f o r s l e d d i n g u s e t h a t i s f r e e f r o m o b s t a c l e s o r s t r e e t e n c r o a c h m e n t . St r u c t u r e S t r u c t u r e - A s e p a r a t e s t r u c t u r e u s e d f o r m a i n t e n a n c e , s t o r a g e , e t c . D o e s n o t r e c e i v e a N e i g h b o r h o o d o r C o m m u n i t y s c or e . Te n n i s T e n n i s c o u r t s – O n e r e g u l a t i o n c o u r t t h a t i s f e n c e d a n d h a s n e t s . Te n n i s C o m p l e x T e n n i s C o m p l e x – R e g u l a t i o n c o u r t s t h a t a r e f e n c e d a n d h a v e n e t s . P l a c e d i n a g r o u p o f 8 o r m o r e c o u r t s . Tr a c k , C o m p e t i t i o n T r a c k , c o m p e t i t i o n – A m u l t i - l a n e , r e g u l a t i o n s i z e d t r a c k a p p r o p r i a t e f o r c o m p e t i t i v e t r a c k a n d f i e l d e v e n t s an d a v a i l a b l e f o r p u b l i c u s e . C o m m u n i t y co m p o n e n t . Tr a i l s , P r i m i t i v e T r a i l s - p r i m i t i v e – T r a i l s , u n p a v e d , t h a t i s l o c a t e d w i t h i n a p a r k o r n a t u r a l a r e a . T h a t p r o v i d e s r e c r e a t i o n a l o p p o r t u n i t i e s o r c o n n e c t i o n s t o u s e r s . Me a s u r e d p e r e a c h i f q u a n t i t y a v a i l a b l e . Tr a i l s , M u l t i - u s e T r a i l s - m u l t i - u s e – T r a i l s , p a v e d o r u n p a v e d , t h a t a r e s e p a r a t e d f r o m t h e r o a d a n d p r o v i d e r e c r e a t i o n a l o p p o r t u n it i e s o r c o n n e c t i o n s t o w a l k e r s , b i k e r s , ro l l e r b l a d e r s a n d e q u e s t r i a n u s e r s . L o c a t e d w i t h i n a d e d i c a t e d R O W . M a y r u n t h o u g h a p a r k o r p a r k s b u t i s n o t w h o l l y c o n t a i n e d w i t h i n a s i n g l e p a r k . Ca n b e a c o m p o n e n t o f a p a r k i f i t g o e s b e y o n d t h e p a r k b o u n d a r i e s , o r c a n b e i t s o w n p a r k t y p e . M e a s u r e d i n m i l e s . Tr a i l h e a d M a r k e r , p o s t , s i g n o r m a p i n d i c a t i n g l o c a t i o n , i n t e r s e c t i o n , b e g i n n i n g o r e n d o f t r a i l . Vo l l e y b a l l V o l l e y b a l l c o u r t - O n e f u l l - s i z e d c o u r t . S u r f a c e m a y b e g r a s s , s a n d , o r a s p h a l t . M a y h a v e p e r m a n e n t o r p o r t a b l e p o s t s a n d n e t s . Wa t e r F e a t u r e W a t e r f e a t u r e – A p a s s i v e w a t e r - b a s e d a m e n i t y t h a t p r o v i d e s a v i s u a l f o c a l p o i n t . I n c l u d e s f o u n t a i n s , a n d w a t e r f a l ls Wa t e r A c c e s s , D e v e l o p e d W a t e r A c c e s s - D e v e l o p e d - I n c l u d e s d o c k s , p i e r s , b o a t r a m p s , f i s h i n g f a c i l i t i e s , e t c . R e c e i v e s q u a n t i t y f o r e a c h p i e r , d o c k , e t c . Wa t e r A c c e s s , G e n e r a l W a t e r A c c e s s - G e n e r a l - M e a s u r e s a p e d e s t r i a n ' s g e n e r a l a b i l i t y t o h a v e c o n t a c t o r a n e x p e r i e n c e w i t h t h e w a t e r . U s u a l l y r e c e i v e s q u a n t i t y o f o n e fo r e a c h p a r k . !( !( !( !( 08 5 - R e s t r o o m 08 8 - O p e n T u r f 08 7 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 08 6 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 8t h S t r e e t P a r k N W 1 0 t h A v e N K e n m e r e P l W C h a t e a u A ve W W i l l ow b r o o k D r W D e l m a r D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ 8t h S t r e e t P a r k 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas 8th Street Park 2 Less street visibility than most of the other parks Initial Inventory Date: 2.7Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 19.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 2Restrooms 2Shade 2Trail Connection 1Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 19.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L146 PARCEL 1 2 2 088 Open Turf 1 2 2 087 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 086 Playground, Local 1 2 2 085 Restroom 1 0 0 !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( 02 5 - R e s t r o o m 02 9 - O p e n T u r f 02 8 - B a l l f i e l d 02 7 - B a l l f i e l d 02 6 - L o o p W a l k 02 4 - D i s k G o l f 02 3 - B a s k e t b a l l 03 1 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 03 0 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Be a r C r e e k P a r k W K o d i a k D r S S t o d d a r d R d S B e a r C l a w W a y S Ala s k a W a y W C u b S t W C h r i s t o p h e r S t S Ice Bear W a y W G e y s e r S t W C a v e B e a r S t S B e a r t o o t h W a y S G a r i b a l d i A v e W P o l a r B e a r S t W C a v e B e a r C t W K o di a k D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Be a r C r e e k P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Bear Creek Park 2 Typ community park Initial Inventory Date: 18.8Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 43.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 1Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 2Restrooms 1Shade 2Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 43.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L148 PARCEL 1 2 2 031 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 Typical of larger shelters 030 Playground, Local 1 2 2 Not really a destination 029 Open Turf 1 2 2 028 Ballfield 1 2 2 027 Ballfield 1 2 2 026 Loop Walk 1 2 2 025 Restroom 1 0 0 024 Disk Golf 1 2 2 Seasonal use 023 Basketball 1 2 2 2x half court !( 30 0 - O t h e r - A c t i v e Bo r u p / B o t t l e s P r o p e r t i e s W C h e r r y L n N M c D e r m o t t R d N C h a p m a n L n Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Bo r u p / B o t t l e s P r o p e r t i e s 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Borup Bottles Properties 0 Currently undeveloped property Initial Inventory Date: 47.0Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 1 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 0Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 0Park Access 0Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L163 PARCEL 1 2 2 300 Other-Active 1 0 0 Rodeo grounds !( !( !( !( !( !( 09 9 - R e s t r o o m 30 1 - O p e n T u r f 10 2 - P u b l i c A r t 09 8 - B a s k e t b a l l 10 0 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 10 1 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Ce n t e n n i a l P a r k Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ce n t e n n i a l P a r k GRASP® Atlas Centennial Park 2 Urban pocket park Initial Inventory Date: 0.4Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 26.4 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 2Restrooms 2Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 28.8 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L153 PARCEL 1 2 2 301 Open Turf 1 2 2 102 Public Art 1 2 2 101 Playground, Local 1 2 2 Neos system 100 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 099 Restroom 1 0 0 098 Basketball 0.5 2 2 !( !(!( !( !( !( 20 5 - R e s t r o o m 20 3 - L o o p W a l k 20 7 - B a s k e t b a l l 20 4 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 20 6 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 20 2 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Ch a m p i o n P a r k E O M e r a S t N Troxe l W a y N L e s l i e W a y N C a f f e r t y W a y E S u m m e r D a w n S t E V a n O k e r S t Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ch a m p i o n P a r k 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Champion Park 2 Initial Inventory Date: 5.9Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 28.8 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 3Restrooms 1Shade 2Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 28.8 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L151 PARCEL 1 2 2 207 Basketball 1 2 2 2x half court 206 MP Field, Large 1 2 2 205 Restroom 1 0 0 204 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 203 Loop Walk 1 2 2 202 Playground, Local 1 2 2 !( !( !( !( !( !( !( 06 8 - R e s t r o o m 06 9 - L o o p W a l k 06 6 - B a s k e t b a l l 06 7 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 06 5 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 06 3 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 06 4 - B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e Ch a t e a u P a r k W C h a t e a u D r N Maxie Wa y N T o d d W a y Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ch a t e a u P a r k 02 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Chateau Park 0 Initial Inventory Date: 6.7Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 33.6 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 1Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 2Restrooms 2Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 33.6 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L145 PARCEL 1 2 2 069 Loop Walk 1 2 2 068 Restroom 1 0 0 067 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 066 Basketball 1 2 2 065 MP Field, Large 1 2 2 064 Backstop, Practice 1 2 2 063 Playground, Local 1 2 2 No seating G F !( !(!( !( !( !( 01 1 - R e s t r o o m 00 9 - E v e n t S p a c e 10 7 - P a s s i v e N o d e 10 6 - W a t e r F e a t u r e 01 0 - S h e l t e r , S h a d e 10 8 - E d u c a t i o n a l E x p e r i e n c e Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l P l a z a N M a i n S t N M e r i d i a n R d W R a i l r o a d S t Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ci t y H a l l P l a z a 02 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas City Hall Plaza 0 Initial Inventory Date: 0.9Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 50.4 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 3 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 3Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 3Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 50.4 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L160 PARCEL 1 2 2 108 Educational Experience 1 2 2 107 Passive Node 1 2 2 106 Water Feature 1 3 3 011 Restroom 1 0 0 010 Shelter, Shade 1 2 2 009 Event Space 1 3 3 !( !(!( 10 9 - W a t e r F e a t u r e 11 0 - S h e l t e r , S h a d e 11 1 - E d u c a t i o n a l E x p e r i e n c e Co x M o n u m e n t N M e r i d i a n R d Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Co x M o n u m e n t GRASP® Atlas Cox Monument 0 Initial Inventory Date: 0.1Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 19.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 2Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 0Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 2Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 19.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L156 PARCEL 1 2 2 111 Educational Experience 1 2 2 110 Shelter, Shade 1 2 2 109 Water Feature 1 2 2 !( 00 2 - P a s s i v e N o d e Fi r e S t a t i o n N o . 4 P a r k S Hood Ranch Av e E I n d i a n C r e e k D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Fi r e S t a t i o n N o . 4 P a r k GRASP® Atlas Fire Station No.4 Park 0 Parking at fire house. Access to neighborhood road but adjacent to busy street Initial Inventory Date: 0.5Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 8.8 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 1Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 2Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 8.8 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L161 PARCEL 1 2 2 002 Passive Node 1 2 2 !( !( !( 10 5 - E v e n t S p a c e 10 3 - W a t e r F e a t u r e 10 4 - E d u c a t i o n a l E x p e r i e n c e Ge n e r a t i o n s P l a z a N M a i n S t Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ge n e r a t i o n s P l a z a GRASP® Atlas Generations Plaza 2 Urban plaza Initial Inventory Date: 0.2Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 19.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 2Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 2Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 19.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L152 PARCEL 1 2 2 105 Event Space 1 2 2 Small stage 104 Educational Experience 1 2 2 103 Water Feature 1 2 2 !(!( !(!( !( !( 00 4 - R e s t r o o m 00 7 - L o o p W a l k 00 3 - O p e n T u r f 00 6 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 00 8 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 00 5 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Go r d o n H a r r i s P a r k E G r e e n C an y o n D r S L u x u r y L n S A c c o l a d e A v e S B o n i t o W a y E T hr e e B a r s D r E G r i f f o n S t E B l u e T i c k S t E G o l d s t o n e S t S Ta g i s h W a y S Br a n d y s J e w e l A v e E C o p p e r P o i n t S t S W e l l s A v e S R e d C l o u d A v e E T h r e e B a r s D r S W e l l s A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Go r d o n H a r r i s P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Gordon Harris Park 2 Would be nice to have some seating at playground other than tables at shelter Adjacent to large school Initial Inventory Date: 11.1Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 31.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 1Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 3Restrooms 2Shade 2Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 2Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 31.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L154 PARCEL 1 2 2 008 MP Field, Large 1 N 2 2 Nice turf area. Club lacrosse programming 007 Loop Walk 1 2 2 006 Shelter, Group 1 3 3 Nice shelter 005 Playground, Local 1 2 2 004 Restroom 1 0 0 003 Open Turf 1 2 2 G F !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( 25 2 - T e n n i s 31 1 - B a l l f i e l d 24 9 - B a l l f i e l d 25 3 - B a s k e t b a l l 25 1 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 24 8 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 24 6 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 25 0 - B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e 24 7 - T r a c k , C o m p e t i t i o n He r i t a g e M i d d l e S c h o o l He r i t a g e M i d d l e S c h o o l He r i t a g e M i d d l e S c h o o l B a l l F i e l d s E M c Mi l l a n R d E S i l v e r T o r c h S t E P a i n te d H i l ls D r E S e n i t a C a n y o n S t E B on i t a C a n y o n S t N R e d H i l l s A v e N R e d H i l l s A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ He r i t a g e M i d d l e S c h o o l B a l l F i e l d s 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Heritage Ball Fields 0 Portolet restroom Initial Inventory Date: 4.0Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 22 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 14.3 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L158 PARCEL 1 2 2 311 Ballfield 2 Y 2 2 251 MP Field, Large 2 2 2 250 Backstop, Practice 1 2 2 249 Ballfield 2 2 2 248 MP Field, Large 1 2 2 !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( 15 9 - S h e l t e r 16 7 - L o o p W a l k 16 0 - O p e n T u r f 16 5 - B a s k e t b a l l 16 2 - C o n c e s s i o n s 16 4 - P a s s i v e N o d e 16 6 - W a t e r F e a t u r e 16 3 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 16 1 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 15 8 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l He r o e s P a r k W L o s t R a p i d s D r N T e n M i l e R d W A n a t o l e D r W M a l t a D r N B i g C e d a r A v e N B l a c k S a n d A v e W W o l f R a p i d s D r W L a d le R a p i d s S t W R a v e n n a S t W H u n g r y C r e e k D r N B l a c k S a n d A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ He r o e s P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Heroes Park 2 Nice sports field park with upgraded amenities Initial Inventory Date: 30.1Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 148 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 3 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 3Restrooms 0Shade 2Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 3Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 97.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L149 PARCEL 1 2 2 167 Loop Walk 1 2 2 166 Water Feature 1 3 3 165 Basketball 3 3 3 Upgraded hoops 164 Passive Node 1 2 2 163 Shelter, Group 1 3 3 162 Concessions 1 3 3 With restroom 161 MP Field, Large 5 2 2 Nice large multi use area 160 Open Turf 1 2 2 159 Shelter 1 2 2 158 Playground, Local 1 3 3 This is one of the nicer local in meridian !( 03 2 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e Ja b i l F i e l d s E C e n t r a l D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ja b i l F i e l d s 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Jabil Fields 0 Multipurpose fields with parking lot Initial Inventory Date: 6.9Approximate Park Acreage: Joint SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 6.6 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 1 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 0Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 4.4 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L203 PARCEL 1 2 2 032 MP Field, Large 2 2 2 G F !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( 23 8 - R e s t r o o m 23 7 - D o g P a r k 23 3 - R e s t r o o m 21 8 - D o g P a r k 20 8 - R e s t r o o m 24 5 - L o o p W a l k 24 4 - L o o p W a l k 24 1 - O p e n T u r f 22 4 - O p e n T u r f 21 4 - L o o p W a l k 22 9 - B o c c e B a l l 22 8 - B a s k e t b a l l 22 7 - V o l l e y b a l l 22 2 - O p e n W a t e r 22 0 - O p e n W a t e r 21 1 - P u b l i c A r t 23 5 - E v e n t S p a c e 23 2 - C o n c e s s i o n s 24 3 - O t h e r - A c t i v e 24 0 - O t h e r - A c t i v e 23 6 - P a s s i v e N o d e 21 9 - P a s s i v e N o d e 21 6 - P a s s i v e N o d e 21 5 - P a s s i v e N o d e 21 2 - P a s s i v e N o d e 24 2 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 23 9 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 23 4 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 22 6 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 20 9 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 21 0 - G a r d e n , D i s p l a y 23 1 - A q u a F e a t , S p r a y 25 4 - G a r d e n , C o m m u n i t y 22 3 - W a t e r A c c e s s , G e n e r a l 22 1 - W a t e r A c c e s s , G e n e r a l 21 7 - E d u c a t i o n a l E x p e r i e n c e 21 3 - E d u c a t i o n a l E x p e r i e n c e 23 0 - P l a y g r o u n d , D e s t i n a t i o n Me r i d i a n S e n i o r C e n t e r Ju l i u s M . K l e i n e r M e m o r i a l P a r k N R e c o r d s W a y E T a h i t i D r E E l d e n G r a y S t E L o n g w i n g L n E T a h i t i S t E V i l l a g e D r N S h a r o n D r E M e a d o w W o o d D r E G r e e n M e a d o w D r E R i v e r V a l l e y S t N V e n t u r e S t E V e n t u r e C i r 22 5 - E v e n t S p a c e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ju l i u s M . K l e i n e r M e m o r i a l P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Julius M. Kleiner Park 2 Great park and design Initial Inventory Date: 57.9Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 347 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 3 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 3Seating 2BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 3Restrooms 1Shade 3Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 3Seasonal Plantings 3Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 308 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments 217 Educational Experience 1 2 2 History based kiosk 208 Restroom 1 0 0 225 Event Space 1 3 3 Large plaza overlooking pond 224 Open Turf 1 2 2 223 Water Access, General 1 2 2 222 Open Water 1 2 2 221 Water Access, General 1 2 2 Fishing access 220 Open Water 1 2 2 227 Volleyball 1 2 2 218 Dog Park 1 1 1 Small DOLA 228 Basketball 1.5 2 2 216 Passive Node 1 2 2 215 Passive Node 1 2 2 Veterans memorial 214 Loop Walk 1 2 2 213 Educational Experience 1 2 2 212 Passive Node 1 2 2 211 Public Art 3 3 3 Large public art pieces 210 Garden, Display 1 2 2 Nice arboretum that will get better with maturity 209 Shelter, Group 1 3 3 Upgraded shelter for large groups GRASP® Atlas 219 Passive Node 1 2 2 237 Dog Park 1 1 1 Large dog DOLA 254 Garden, Community 1 3 3 245 Loop Walk 1 2 2 Soft trail loop 244 Loop Walk 1 2 2 243 Other-Active 1 2 2 242 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 241 Open Turf 1 2 2 240 Other-Active 1 2 2 Small play piece at shelter 226 Shelter, Group 1 3 3 Large upgraded shelter 238 Restroom 1 0 0 L159 PARCEL 1 2 2 236 Passive Node 1 2 2 235 Event Space 1 3 3 234 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 More standard shelter 233 Restroom 1 0 0 232 Concessions 1 2 2 231 Aqua Feat, Spray 1 2 2 Could use more shade adjacent to play and spray 230 Playground, Destination 1 2 2 229 Bocce Ball 2 3 3 239 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK G F !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(05 7 - G o l f 05 8 - L o o p W a l k 05 4 - L o o p W a l k 05 6 - D r i v i n g R a n g e 06 1 - M u l t i u s e C o u r t 05 9 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 06 2 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 29 7 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 27 4 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 06 0 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Go l f C o u r s e C l u b H o u s e La k e v i e w G o l f C o u r s e Po n d e r o s a E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Se a s o n s P a r k W C h e r r y L n N T e n M i l e R d N B l a c k C a t R d N T u r n b e r r y W a y W D a w s o n D r W W h i t e A s h D r W M o o n L a k e D r W W o o d m o n t D r W S u g a r C r e e k D r W T a l a m o r e B l v d N O a k H i l l s D r W M u i r f i e l d D r N Silverl eaf Way W H a r b o r P o i n t D r W T a l a m o r e D r N V a l l e y G r e e n W a y N G o l f v i e w W a y N A r o n m i n k W a y W C l a s s i c Dr W C h a r l e s S t W T e t e r S t N W i l l o w s i d e A v e W M o o n L a k e S t W C h a t e a u D r N R o b i e A v e W S t a n w i c h D r W M o o n l a k e D r N D a y s i d e A v e N T a n g e n t A v e W F o x t r o t t e r D r N T e s s a A v e N A l t o L n W F i e l d s t r e a m D r N W a g g l e P l W K e n d r i c k S t W A n n S t N H e a r t h A v e W G e m s t o n e D r N Bur l e y W a y N E v e n i n g s i d e W a y W H i g a n S t W T o u r n a m e n t Dr W S h i r d a l e D r N I n c l i n e W a y N V i c t o r W a y W R a v e n h u r s t S t W W h i t e B i r c h D r N I n t e r l a c h e n W a y N S u m m e r t r e e W a y N G r e e n f i e l d A v e W K a n d i c e S t N M o n t g o m e r y A v e W N i e m a n n D r N Sto n e P l W D a l y L n W A n g e l i c a D r W P l u m r o s e S t W Q u a k e r R i d g e D r W J o u s t S t N V i c t o r A v e N S t o n e A v e N C a l l a w a y P l W B o n n e r S t W B e d r o c k D r N Scioto P l N Ben t Gras s L n W Q u a k e r R i d g e S t W M i r a g e C t N Gr eenbelt Pl W Se a I s l a n d C t N W h i t e O a k W a y N C r o o k e d C r e e k W a y W T u p e l o C t W Ki r k a m L n W P a t e l C t N S w a i n s o n A v e N A r o n m i n k L n N Phoenix Ave W D i l lo n D r N W a g g l e P l N S w a i n s o n A v e W M o o n L a k e S t Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ La k e v i e w G o l f C o u r s e 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1, 2 5 0 1, 5 0 0 1, 7 5 0 2, 0 0 0 2, 2 5 0 2, 5 0 0 2, 7 5 0 3, 0 0 0 3, 2 5 0 3, 5 0 0 3, 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Lakeview Golf Course 0 Initial Inventory Date: 119.4Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 13.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 0Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 0Park Access 0Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 13.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L165 PARCEL 1 2 2 057 Golf 1 2 2 056 Driving Range 1 2 2 !( !( !( !( !( !(01 6 - R e s t r o o m 01 3 - L o o p W a l k 01 7 - B a s k e t b a l l 01 4 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 01 2 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 01 5 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Re n a i s s a n c e P a r k E Z a l d i a D r S D a V i n c i W a y E R a g u s a L n E D e e r hi l l D r S M o n t a g u e W a y S G e n o a r d A v e E D e c a m e r o n L n E R a g u s a S t E D e e r h i l l D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Re n a i s s a n c e P a r k 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Renaissance Park 2 Typ neighborhood park Initial Inventory Date: 6.5Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 28.8 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 3Restrooms 1Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 28.8 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L157 PARCEL 1 2 2 017 Basketball 1 2 2 2x half courts 016 Restroom 1 0 0 015 Playground, Local 1 2 2 014 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 013 Loop Walk 1 2 2 012 MP Field, Large 1 2 2 !( !( !( !( !( !( !( 04 9 - R e s t r o o m 05 4 - L o o p W a l k 05 2 - P u b l i c A r t 04 8 - B a s k e t b a l l 05 0 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 05 3 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 05 1 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Se a s o n s P a r k W T a l a m o r e D r N T r i c i a W a y N D a y s i d e A v e N S w e e t w o o d A v e N O C onn e r A v e N W i l l o w s i d e A v e W R i d g e s i d e S t W C r o s s r i d g e S t N E v e n i n g s i d e W a y W R i d g e s i d e C t W C r o s s r i d g e C t Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Se a s o n s P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Seasons Park 2 Typical Initial Inventory Date: 6.9Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 33.6 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 3Restrooms 2Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 33.6 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L150 PARCEL 1 2 2 054 Loop Walk 1 2 2 053 MP Field, Large 1 2 2 052 Public Art 1 2 2 051 Playground, Local 1 2 2 050 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 049 Restroom 1 0 0 048 Basketball 1 2 2 !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( 14 4 - T e n n i s 14 3 - T e n n i s 14 2 - T e n n i s 15 7 - D i s k G o l f 15 5 - O p e n T u r f 15 4 - O p e n T u r f 13 8 - B a l l f i e l d 13 6 - B a l l f i e l d 13 5 - B a l l f i e l d 14 7 - H o r s e s h o e s 15 1 - C o n c e s s i o n s 13 7 - C o n c e s s i o n s 13 9 - B a t t i n g C a g e 15 6 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 15 0 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 14 9 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 14 5 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 14 6 - C o m p l e x , T e n n i s 14 1 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 15 2 - A q u a F e a t , S p r a y 14 0 - C o m p l e x , B a l l f i e l d 14 8 - C o m p l e x , H o r s e s h o e s 15 3 - P l a y g r o u n d , D e s t i n a t i o n Se t t l e r s P a r k W U s t i c k R d N M e r i d i a n R d W A s h b y D r E U s t ic k R d E A s h b y D r N L e z a n a A v e N W 3 r d S t N P r i c e W a y W A s h b y D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Se t t l e r s P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Settlers Park 2 Great active park. Well designed Initial Inventory Date: 57.7Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 554 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 3 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 3Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 2Restrooms 2Shade 2Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 3Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 207 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments 147 Horseshoes 16 3 3 136 Ballfield 1 2 2 Little league baseball 137 Concessions 1 2 2 138 Ballfield 3 2 2 Skinned infields 139 Batting Cage 3 2 2 140 Complex, Ballfield 1 0 3 Nice complex 141 MP Field, Large 6 2 2 142 Tennis 1 3 3 Champions court 143 Tennis 3 3 3 144 Tennis 6 3 3 135 Ballfield 2 2 2 Large baseball fields 146 Complex, Tennis 1 0 3 L143 PARCEL 1 2 2 148 Complex, Horseshoes 1 0 3 149 Shelter, Group 1 3 3 150 Shelter, Group 1 3 3 151 Concessions 1 3 3 With restroom 152 Aqua Feat, Spray 1 3 3 Would be great with more theme. Removed in winter. 153 Playground, Destination 1 Y 3 3 GRASP® Atlas 154 Open Turf 1 2 2 155 Open Turf 1 2 2 156 Shelter, Group 1 3 3 157 Disk Golf 1 2 2 145 Shelter, Group 1 3 3 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK So u t h M e r i d i a n P r o p e r t y E L a k e H a z e l R d S L o c u s t G r o v e R d E V i a R o b e r t o L n S R a a p R a n c h L n Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ So u t h M e r i d i a n P r o p e r t y 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 5 0 0 1 , 7 5 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 2 5 0 2 , 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas South Meridian Property 0 Currently undeveloped parcel Initial Inventory Date: 77.0Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 1 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 0Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 0Park Access 0Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L162 PARCEL 1 2 2 G F !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( 04 5 - R e s t r o o m 04 0 - D o g P a r k 03 4 - R e s t r o o m 04 4 - B a l l f i e l d 04 1 - B a l l f i e l d 04 2 - H o r s e s h o e s 04 6 - E v e n t S p a c e 03 8 - C o n c e s s i o n s 03 3 - P a s s i v e N o d e 04 3 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 03 7 - P i c n i c G r o u n d s 03 6 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 03 9 - A q u a F e a t , P o o l 03 5 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Ch a m b e r o f C o m m e r c e St o r e y P a r k Me r i d i a n S w i m m i n g P o o l E F r a n k l i n R d S M a i n S t E W a te rt o w e r S t S S t r a t f o r d D r S M e r i d i a n R d E G e m S t S R o s e C i r E S c h i l l e r L n E S c e n e r y L n W F r a n k l i n R d W P e n n w o o d S t N M a i n S t N E 3 r d S t Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ St o r e y P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Storey Park 2 Older park that could use some updates Initial Inventory Date: 17.9Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 45.6 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 1Bike Parking 2Restrooms 2Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 40.8 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L147 PARCEL 1 2 2 045 Restroom 1 0 0 044 Ballfield 1 Y 1 1 Could be updated and modern lighting 043 Shelter, Group 1 1 1 Doesn't meet current standards 042 Horseshoes 3 1 1 041 Ballfield 1 Y 1 1 Limited use field that could use updates and modern lighting 040 Dog Park 1 2 2 Future dog park 037 Picnic Grounds 1 2 2 036 Shelter, Group 1 1 1 Doesn't meet the standards of the newer shelters 035 Playground, Local 1 2 2 Highly visible spot could be a good destination 034 Restroom 1 0 0 Located in completely separate part of chamber building 033 Passive Node 1 2 2 !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( 07 7 - R e s t r o o m 08 4 - L o o p W a l k 07 9 - B a l l f i e l d 07 8 - B a l l f i e l d 08 3 - S k a t e P a r k 08 0 - B a s k e t b a l l 08 1 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 07 5 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 08 2 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 07 6 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Tu l l y P a r k N L i n d e r R d W D a r r a h D r W C h a t e a u A v e W C l a i r e S t N W 1 3 t h S t N W 1 2 t h S t W W o o d b u r y D r W C h a t e a u D r W T u r t l e C r e e k D r N W 1 1 t h A v e W C r e e k b u r y D r W C l a i r e D r W R a i n c r e st D r N B l u e S p r i n g s A v e N S o m m e r s b y W a y N T u l l y C o v e W a y N T u l l y C o v e P l NW 14th St Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Tu l l y P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Tully Park 2 Initial Inventory Date: 18.7Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 48 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 2Restrooms 2Shade 2Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 48 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L144 PARCEL 1 2 2 084 Loop Walk 1 2 2 083 Skate Park 1 2 2 082 MP Field, Large 1 2 2 081 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 Large group shelter 080 Basketball 1 2 2 Full court 079 Ballfield 1 2 2 078 Ballfield 1 2 2 077 Restroom 1 0 0 076 Playground, Local 1 2 2 075 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 !( !( !(!( 31 2 - L o o p W a l k 31 4 - P a s s i v e N o d e 31 5 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 31 3 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Ba i n b r i d g e S u b d i v i s i o n W i l l i a m W a t s o n Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ba i n b r i d g e S u b d i v i s i o n W i l l i a m W a t s o n 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas William Watson 2 based on plans Initial Inventory Date: 7.4Approximate Park Acreage: MeridianOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 26.4 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 2Restrooms 1Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 2Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 26.4 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L155 PARCEL 1 2 2 315 MP Field, Large 1 2 2 based on draft plan document 314 Passive Node 1 3 3 based on draft plan document 313 Playground, Local 1 2 2 based on draft plan document 312 Loop Walk 1 2 2 based on draft plan document THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Meridian, Idaho Parks &Recreation Final Inventory Atlas March 2015 Outdoor Inventory: School Properties An d r u s E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ An d r u s E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Andrus Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 7.2Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L177 PARCEL 1 2 2 !( !( !( !( !( 07 0 - B a l l f i e l d 07 4 - M u l t i u s e C o u r t 07 2 - M P F i e l d , S m a l l 07 3 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 07 1 - B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e Ba r b a r a M o r g a n S t e m A c a d e m y N L i n d e r R d W C h a t e a u D r W T a n a C t W B e a r d e n C t W S a n d a l w o o d D r W T a n a D r W K i n g s w o o d C t W K i n g s w o o d A v e W S a n d a l w o o d D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ba r b a r a M o r g a n S t e m A c a d e m y 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Barbara Morgan Stem Academy 0 Initial Inventory Date: 10.0Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 11 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 11 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L188 PARCEL 1 2 2 074 Multiuse Court 1 2 2 073 Playground, Local 1 2 2 072 MP Field, Small 1 1 1 071 Backstop, Practice 1 2 2 070 Ballfield 1 1 1 !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( 12 3 - S h e l t e r 12 9 - L o o p W a l k 12 2 - B a l l f i e l d 12 1 - B a l l f i e l d 12 0 - V o l l e y b a l l 12 7 - M u l t i u s e C o u r t 11 9 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 12 8 - M P F i e l d , S m a l l 12 6 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 13 0 - B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e 12 4 - P l a y g r o u n d , D e s t i n a t i o n Fu l l e r P a r k Ch a p a r r a l E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l W W a v e D r W A c a r r e r a C t N C l i f f C r e e k A v e N B r i t t P l W F o r e c a s t S t W S a lm o n C r e e k S t N New Creek Ave Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ch a p a r r a l E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Chaparral Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 11.9Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L189 PARCEL 1 2 2 Ch i e f J o s e p h E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l E C h a t e a u D r N Z i r c o n A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ch i e f J o s e p h E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Chief Joseph Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 10.1Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L187 PARCEL 1 2 2 Ch r i s t i n e D o n n e l l S c h o o l o f t h e A r t s Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ch r i s t i n e D o n n e l l S c h o o l o f t h e A r t s 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Christine Donnell School of the Arts 0 Initial Inventory Date: 9.6Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L300 PARCEL 1 2 2 Cr o s s r o a d s M i d d l e S c h o o l N N o l a R d Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Cr o s s r o a d s M i d d l e S c h o o l 02 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Crossroads Middle School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 4.9Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L301 PARCEL 1 2 2 De s e r t S a g e E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ De s e r t S a g e E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Desert Sage Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 9.2Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L199 PARCEL 1 2 2 Di s c o v e r y E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Pa t h w a y s M i d d l e S c h o o l E P a r a d i s e L n E Le i g h F i e l d D r N L o c u s t G r o v e R d N D i x o n A v e E H e r i t a g e P a r k L n N S u m m e r s i d e L n N N e i t h A v e E L o b e l i a St Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Di s c o v e r y E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Discovery Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 10.5Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L200 PARCEL 1 2 2 Ga t e w a y S c h o o l o f L a n g u a g e & C u l t u r e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ga t e w a y S c h o o l o f L a n g u a g e & C u l t u r e 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Gateway School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 9.9Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L180 PARCEL 1 2 2 G F !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( 25 2 - T e n n i s 31 1 - B a l l f i e l d 24 9 - B a l l f i e l d 25 3 - B a s k e t b a l l 25 1 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 24 8 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 24 6 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 25 0 - B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e 24 7 - T r a c k , C o m p e t i t i o n He r i t a g e M i d d l e S c h o o l He r i t a g e M i d d l e S c h o o l He r i t a g e M i d d l e S c h o o l B a l l F i e l d s E M c Mi l l an R d N M e r i d i a n R d N R e d H i l l s A v e W M c M i l l a n R d N D o n a v a n A v e N R e d H i l l s A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ He r i t a g e M i d d l e S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Heritage Middle School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 39.3Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 25.3 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 9.9 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L302 PARCEL 1 2 2 253 Basketball 3 2 2 252 Tennis 6 2 2 247 Track, Competition 1 1 1 Soft surface? 246 MP Field, Large 1 2 2 Hu n t e r E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l W M c M i l l a n R d W Los F l ores D r N C o p p e r c l o u d W a y W Q u i n t a l e D r W M i l a z z o S t W A sto n t e D r W S a l e rn o S t N P a l a t i n e W a y W P a c h i n o S t N C o o l R i v e r A v e N C o o l R i v e r A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Hu n t e r E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Hunter Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 12.8Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L179 PARCEL 1 2 2 Jo p l i n E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Jo p l i n E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Joplin Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 9.8Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L178 PARCEL 1 2 2 La k e H a z e l E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ La k e H a z e l E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Lake Hazel Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 9.9Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L196 PARCEL 1 2 2 La k e H a z e l M i d d l e S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ La k e H a z e l M i d d l e S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Lake Hazel Middle School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 27.5Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L303 PARCEL 1 2 2 Le w i s & C l a r k M i d d l e S c h o o l E P i n e A v e N P r i n c i p l e P l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Le w i s & C l a r k M i d d l e S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Lewis & Clark Middle School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 35.2Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L304 PARCEL 1 2 2 !(!( !( !( !( !( 19 5 - O p e n T u r f 19 0 - L o o p W a l k 18 8 - S k a t e P a r k 18 9 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 18 7 - B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e C. F . M c D e v i t t P a r k Lo w e l l S c o t t M i d d l e S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Lo w e l l S c o t t M i d d l e S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Lowell Scott Middle School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 26.7Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L305 PARCEL 1 2 2 !( !(!( 02 0 - M u l t i u s e C o u r t 01 8 - M P F i e l d , S m a l l 01 9 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Ma r y M c P h e r s o n E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l E A m i t y R d Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ma r y M c P h e r s o n E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Mary McPherson Elementary School 0 Older school Initial Inventory Date: 7.8Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.4 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 2Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.4 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L194 PARCEL 1 2 2 G F !( !( !( !( 09 7 - M u l t i u s e C o u r t 09 6 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 09 4 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 09 5 - B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e Bo y s a n d G i r l s C l u b Me r i d i a n E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l N W 1 s t S t N M e r i d i a n R d W C a r l t o n A v e N W 2 n d S t N W 1 s t S t Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Me r i d i a n E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Meridian Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 12.0Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L190 PARCEL 1 2 2 G F !( !( !(!( !( 08 9 - T e n n i s 09 0 - B a l l f i e l d 09 3 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 09 1 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 09 2 - T r a c k , C o m p e t i t i o n Me r i d i a n M i d d l e S c h o o l Me r i d i a n M i d d l e S c h o o l W C h e r r y L n N W 8 t h S t N W 7 t h S t W C a m e l l i a L n N W 1 3 t h A v e W E lm C t W W a s h ing t o n S t N W 1 2 t h A v e W M a p l e A v e W N o r t h G a t e C t N W 1 1 t h S t W M a p l e A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Me r i d i a n M i d d l e S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Meridian Middle School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 34.6Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 15.4 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 8.8 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L110 PARCEL 1 2 2 093 MP Field, Large 1 1 1 092 Track, Competition 1 1 1 091 MP Field, Large 1 2 2 090 Ballfield 2 1 1 089 Tennis 6 1 1 G F Pa r a m o u n t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Pa r a m o u n t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l W P r o d u c e r D r N D i e t r i c h A v e W Ca g n e y S t W Va l e n t i n o S t W Cr o s b y D r W C o l b e r t S t W Pe c k S t W Dr e yfus s S t W A r n a z S t W C a g n e y D r W Pi c k f o r d S t W G a b l e S t W K i n g s l e y S t W C a g n e y S t W Va l e n t i n o S t Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Pa r a m o u n t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Paramount Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 10.4Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L201 PARCEL 1 2 2 Pa t h w a y s M i d d l e S c h o o l Di s c o v e r y E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l E Leig h F i e l d D r N N e i t h A v e E H e r i t a g e P a r k L n E L o be l i a S t N S u m m e r s i d e L n Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Pa t h w a y s M i d d l e S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Pathways Middle School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 7.4Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L306 PARCEL 1 2 2 Pe p p e r R i d g e E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Pe p p e r m i n t P a r k Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Pe p p e r R i d g e E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Pepper Ridge Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 7.0Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L193 PARCEL 1 2 2 !( !( !( !( 13 3 - L o o p W a l k 13 2 - M u l t i u s e C o u r t 13 4 - M P F i e l d , S m a l l 13 1 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Pe r e g r i n e E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l W W a l t m a n S t W B a y e u x D r W J o s h u a L n S F l i n t s t o n e A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Pe r e g r i n e E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Peregrine Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 10.9Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L192 PARCEL 1 2 2 !( !( 19 9 - O p e n T u r f 19 8 - L o o p W a l k Pi o n e e r S c h o o l o f t h e A r t s Co t t o n w o o d P a r k Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Pi o n e e r S c h o o l o f t h e A r t s 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Pioneer School of the Arts 0 Initial Inventory Date: 12.3Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L181 PARCEL 1 2 2 !( !( !(!(!( !( 05 8 - L o o p W a l k 06 1 - M u l t i u s e C o u r t 05 9 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 06 2 - M P F i e l d , L a r g e 29 7 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 06 0 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Po n d e r o s a E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l W N i e m a n n D r W B i s m a r k D r W P a t e l D r W A n g e l i c a D r N W i l k i n s W a y W B e d r o c k D r W C a m p f i r e S t W M o o n L a k e S t W Mo o n L a k e Dr N I n l e t W a y N L o c h s a A v e N T u r n b e r r y W a y N Lochsa Way N S a g e f i r e A v e N N a o m i A v e N Turnberr y W a y W A n g e l i c a D r W B e d r o c k D r W P a t e l D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Po n d e r o s a E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Ponderosa Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 12.0Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L185 PARCEL 1 2 2 !( 26 7 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Pr o s p e c t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l N R e d H o r s e W a y N T e m p e s t W a y E H a v a s u p a i S t E R e d R o c k D r E L a v a F a l l s S t E G r a n d C a n y o n S t N M o o n e y F a l l s W a y E K a i b a b T r a i l D r E P e a c h S p r i n g s S t N M u l e T r a i n A v e N H e r i t a g e W o o d s W a y E R ed R o c k D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Pr o s p e c t E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Prospect Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 12.7Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L198 PARCEL 1 2 2 Ri v e r V a l l e y E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l N E a g l e R d N J u s t i n P l N S t o k e s b e r r y P l E R i v e r V a l l e y S t E B e r n i c e D r N J u s t i n W a y N C h a n d r a W a y E C ha t e a u D r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ri v e r V a l l e y E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas River Valley Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 12.5Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L186 PARCEL 1 2 2 Sa w t o o t h M i d d l e S c h o o l N L i n d e r R d N M c K i n l e y P a r k A v e W A n t o n D r N A n f i e l d A v e N W a t e r s o n g W a y W A s h b y D r W As h t o n D r N A r c h e s W a y W S t o n e V a l l e y D r N M o r n i n g S k y A v e W B e l l a g i o D r N M o r n i n g S k y P l N W a r m C r e e k A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Sa w t o o t h M i d d l e S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Sawtooth Middle School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 38.9Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L307 PARCEL 1 2 2 Si e n a E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l E R o me D r S C a p u l e t W a y Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Si e n a E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Siena Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 11.3Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L308 PARCEL 1 2 2 Si l v e r S a g e E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Si l v e r S a g e E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Silver Sage Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 9.9Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L195 PARCEL 1 2 2 !(!( !( !( 30 2 - R e s t r o o m 30 5 - O p e n T u r f 30 4 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 30 3 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Sy c a m o r e P a r k Sp a l d i n g S T E M A c a d e m y Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Sp a l d i n g S T E M A c a d e m y 02 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Spalding STEM Academy 0 Initial Inventory Date: 8.4Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L191 PARCEL 1 2 2 Su m m e r w i n d E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Su m m e r w i n d E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Summerwind Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 9.9Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L182 PARCEL 1 2 2 Us t i c k E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l E A r c h D r N S h a r o n A v e Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Us t i c k E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Ustick Elementary School 0 Initial Inventory Date: 9.3Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L184 PARCEL 1 2 2 G F !(!( !( !( !( 17 3 - L o o p W a l k 17 6 - M u l t i u s e C o u r t 17 4 - M P F i e l d , S m a l l 17 5 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Wi l l o w C r e e k E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Wi l l o w C r e e k E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l W C h i n d e n B l v d W T a n g o C r e e k D r N L o n g L a k e W a y W E v e r e s t L n N S i l v e r E l m W a y W B o u l d e r B a r D r N S p u r w i n g W a y W G r a n d T e t o n D r W S i l v e r R i v e r S t Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Wi l l o w C r e e k E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Willow Creek Elementary 0 Initial Inventory Date: 11.3Approximate Park Acreage: SchoolOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 9.9 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 9.9 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L197 PARCEL 1 2 2 176 Multiuse Court 1 2 2 175 Playground, Local 1 2 2 174 MP Field, Small 1 1 1 173 Loop Walk 1 2 2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Meridian, Idaho Parks &Recreation Final Inventory Atlas March 2015 Outdoor Inventory: Other Providers !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( 19 5 - O p e n T u r f 19 3 - B a l l f i e l d 19 2 - B a l l f i e l d 19 1 - B a l l f i e l d 19 0 - L o o p W a l k 18 8 - S k a t e P a r k 18 9 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 19 4 - C o m p l e x , B a l l f i e l d 18 7 - B a c k s t o p , P r a c t i c e C. F . M c D e v i t t P a r k Lo w e l l S c o t t M i d d l e S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ C. F . M c D e v i t t P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas C.F. McDevitt Park 0 Not a very appealing park Initial Inventory Date: 38.6Approximate Park Acreage: BoiseOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 31.9 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 1 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 1Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 1Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 17.6 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L207 PARCEL 1 2 2 195 Open Turf 1 2 2 194 Complex, Ballfield 1 0 2 193 Ballfield 4 2 2 Baseball 192 Ballfield 2 2 2 191 Ballfield 1 2 2 Baseball 190 Loop Walk 1 2 2 189 Playground, Local 1 2 2 188 Skate Park 1 1 1 Not as nice as Meridian 187 Backstop, Practice 4 1 1 Poor condition and no grass !( !( 20 1 - O p e n T u r f 20 0 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Ca m e r o n P a r k Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Ca m e r o n P a r k GRASP® Atlas Cameron Park 0 Initial Inventory Date: 0.8Approximate Park Acreage: BoiseOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 13.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 2Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 0Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 13.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L209 PARCEL 1 2 2 201 Open Turf 1 2 2 200 Playground, Local 1 2 2 !( !( !( 19 9 - O p e n T u r f 19 8 - L o o p W a l k 19 7 - B a s k e t b a l l Co t t o n w o o d P a r k Pi o n e e r S c h o o l o f t h e A r t s Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Co t t o n w o o d P a r k 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Cottonwood Park 0 Initial Inventory Date: 8.1Approximate Park Acreage: BoiseOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 8.8 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 1 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 0Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 2Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 8.8 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L206 PARCEL 1 2 2 199 Open Turf 1 2 2 198 Loop Walk 1 2 2 197 Basketball 1 2 2 !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( 12 3 - S h e l t e r 12 2 - B a l l f i e l d 12 1 - B a l l f i e l d 11 4 - B a l l f i e l d 11 3 - L o o p W a l k 12 0 - V o l l e y b a l l 11 6 - O p e n W a t e r 11 2 - P a s s i v e N o d e 12 5 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 11 9 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 11 8 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 11 5 - F i t n e s s C o u r s e 27 6 - A q u a F e a t , P o o l 27 7 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 12 6 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l 11 7 - W a t e r A c c e s s , G e n e r a l Fu l l e r P a r k W D o v e r D r W H e a r s t S t N B i l t m o r e A v e W B i g C r e e k D r W P a r k C r e e k D r W B l u e C r e e k D r N M a n s h i p P l N W o l f s b u r g A v e W G i l l e t t e D r N O x w i c h A v e W S p r u c e C r e e k D r N G o l f v i e w W a y N Little Creek Ave N C a s a L o m a A v e W T h o r n C r e e k S t N P o r t c h e s t e r A v e W P i n e C r e e k S t N L a u d e r h i l l W a y N Fuller Park Ln W T o w n C r e e k D r N Dee p C r e e k W a y N S a w C r e e k W a y N M i r r o r C r e e k W a y W C h e r r y t r e e C t N Not e l C r e e k Pl W B i g C r e e k C t N Cherry Creek Pl W G i l l e t t e D r 12 4 - P l a y g r o u n d , D e s t i n a t i o n Ch a p a r r a l E l e m e n t a r Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Fu l l e r P a r k 0 2 5 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Fuller Park 0 Nice park setting with mature trees Initial Inventory Date: 23.2Approximate Park Acreage: Western Ada Recreation DistrictOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 60 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 2BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 1Restrooms 2Shade 3Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 1Picnic Tables Components with Score 60 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L208 PARCEL 1 2 2 125 Shelter, Group 1 1 1 124 Playground, Destination 1 3 3 123 Shelter 1 1 1 122 Ballfield 1 1 1 121 Ballfield 1 1 1 120 Volleyball 1 3 3 Nice 119 Shelter, Group 1 1 1 118 Shelter, Group 1 1 1 117 Water Access, General 1 2 2 116 Open Water 1 2 2 115 Fitness Course 1 2 2 114 Ballfield 1 1 1 A little tired but functional field 113 Loop Walk 1 2 2 Multiple loops 112 Passive Node 1 2 2 !( !( !( 04 5 - R e s t r o o m 03 8 - C o n c e s s i o n s 03 9 - A q u a F e a t , P o o l St o r e y P a r k Me r i d i a n S w i m m i n g P o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Me r i d i a n S w i m m i n g P o o l 02 5 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Meridian Swimming Pool 0 Initial Inventory Date: 1.3Approximate Park Acreage: Western Ada Recreation DistrictOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 5.5 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 1 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 0Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 2Bike Parking 2Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 5.5 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L243 PARCEL 1 2 2 039 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 2 2 038 Concessions 1 1 1 !(!( !( !( !( 30 9 - T e n n i s 30 7 - R e s t r o o m 31 0 - O p e n T u r f 30 8 - B a s k e t b a l l 30 6 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Pe p p e r m i n t P a r k Pe p p e r R i d g e E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Pe p p e r m i n t P a r k 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Peppermint Park 0 Initial Inventory Date: 7.0Approximate Park Acreage: BoiseOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 24.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 2Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 2Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 0Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 24.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L204 PARCEL 1 2 2 310 Open Turf 1 2 2 309 Tennis 1 2 2 308 Basketball 1 2 2 307 Restroom 1 0 0 306 Playground, Local 1 3 3 Poured in-place servicing and new equip some theme Se t t l e r s V i l l a g e P a r k Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Se t t l e r s V i l l a g e P a r k GRASP® Atlas Settlers Village Park 0 Initial Inventory Date: 0.5Approximate Park Acreage: Western Ada Recreation DistrictOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 1 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 0Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 0Park Access 0Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L240 PARCEL 1 2 2 !(!( !( !( 30 2 - R e s t r o o m 30 5 - O p e n T u r f 30 4 - S h e l t e r , G r o u p 30 3 - P l a y g r o u n d , L o c a l Sy c a m o r e P a r k Sp a l d i n g S T E M A c a d e m y Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d !( Re c r e a t i o n C o m p o n e n t G F In d o o r F a c i l i t y Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ex i s t i n g P a t h w a y Mi c r o P a t h Ci t y B o u n d a r y ´ Sy c a m o r e P a r k 02 5 0 5 0 0 12 5 Fe e t GRASP® Atlas Sycamore Park 0 Initial Inventory Date: 7.1Approximate Park Acreage: BoiseOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 19.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 1Seating 0BBQ Grills 2Dog Pick-Up Station 2Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 2Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 2Park Access 2Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 2Picnic Tables Components with Score 19.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L205 PARCEL 1 2 2 305 Open Turf 1 2 2 304 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 303 Playground, Local 1 2 2 302 Restroom 1 0 0 W M c M i l l a n R d S E a g l e R d W A m i ty R d N L i n d e r R d W U s t ic k R d W C h e r r y L n S M e r i d i a n R d W V i c t o r y R d N B l a c k C a t R d S T e n M i l e R d N T e n M i l e R d W F r a n k l i n R d N M e r i d i a n R d S B l a c k C a t R d S L i n d e r R d S L o c u s t G r o v e R d E P i n e A v e E A m i t y R d N M c D e r m o t t R d E V i c t o r y R d N L o c u s t G r o v e R d W P i n e A v e N S t a r R d E F r a n k l i n R d N E a g l e R d E U s t i c k R d E O v e r l a n d R d E F a i r v i e w A v e E L a k e H a z e l R d W C h i n d e n B l v d I nt e r s t a t e 8 4 N M a i n S t S P r a t t L n W E l G a t o L n E E a s y J e t D r S S t o d d a r d R d N E 5 t h S t S N o v a L n E C h a t e a u D r S E 5 t h W a y S M a i n S t S R i d g e w o o d R d W A s h t o n D r N F o x R u n W a y E C e n t r a l D r S H o w r y L n W W a p o o t Dr N Records W a y W L e g a c y L n E C h i n d e n B l v d W L ak e H a z e l R d S S e l a t i r P l N R e d H o r s e W a y W W oo d b u r y D r W T e a n o D r N Todd W a y S W 5 t h A v e S R ustler Ln S P e l i c a n W a y N Venture St S M c D e r m o t t R d E R om e D r W W i l l o w b r o o k D r S R o l l i n g H i l l D r S A l l e n S t E A d l e r H o f L n W E v e r e s t L n N P o l l a r d L n W L a k e H a z el R d W P i n e A v e S M c D e r m o t t R d W C h i n d e n B l v d S L i n d e r R d Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d Al t e r n a t i v e P r o v i d e r C o m p o n e n t Ou t d o o r L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ci t y B o u n d a r y 01 2 3 4 5 0. 5 Mi l e s Va r i o u s H O A F a c i l i t i e s GRASP® Atlas HOA 0 Initial Inventory Date: HOA ParkOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 55 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 2 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 1Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 1Park Access 0Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 57.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments 260 Playground, Local 1 0 0 021 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 Hoa pool 196 Playground, Local 1 1 0 255 Playground, Local 1 0 0 256 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 257 Playground, Local 1 0 0 185 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 259 Playground, Local 1 0 0 184 Open Turf 1 2 2 261 Basketball 1 0 0 262 Playground, Local 1 0 0 263 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 264 Playground, Local 1 0 0 265 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 266 Playground, Local 1 0 0 258 Playground, Local 1 0 0 177 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 022 Playground, Local 1 0 0 Hoa 055 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 HOA pool GRASP® Atlas 168 Disk Golf 1 1 1 Seems badly placed in the traffic circle 169 Open Turf 1 2 2 170 Playground, Local 1 2 2 186 Playground, Local 1 0 0 172 Basketball 1 2 2 269 Volleyball 1 0 0 178 Playground, Local 1 2 2 179 Open Turf 1 2 2 180 Playground, Local 1 0 0 181 Playground, Local 1 2 2 182 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 3 3 183 Playground, Local 1 3 3 171 Shelter, Group 1 2 2 293 Basketball 1 0 0 286 Basketball 1 0 0 287 Playground, Local 1 0 0 288 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 289 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 290 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 267 Playground, Local 1 0 0 292 Playground, Local 1 0 0 283 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 294 Basketball 1 0 0 295 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 296 Basketball 1 0 0 297 Playground, Local 1 0 0 298 Playground, Local 1 0 0 299 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 291 Basketball 1 0 0 277 Playground, Local 1 0 0 L245 PARCEL 1 2 2 270 Playground, Local 1 0 0 271 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 272 Playground, Local 1 0 0 273 Playground, Local 1 0 0 274 Playground, Local 1 0 0 285 Playground, Local 1 0 0 276 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 284 Playground, Local 1 0 0 278 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 279 Playground, Local 1 0 0 280 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 GRASP® Atlas 281 Playground, Local 1 0 0 282 Aqua Feat, Pool 1 0 0 268 Playground, Local 1 0 0 275 Playground, Local 1 0 0 S E a g l e R d W M c M i l l a n R d W A m i t y R d N L i n d e r R d W U s t i c k R d W C h e r r y L n S M e r i d i a n R d W V i c t o r y R d S T e n M i l e R d W F r a n k l i n R d N M e r i d i a n R d S L o c u s t G r o v e R d S B l a c k C a t R d S L i n d e r R d E P i n e A v e N M c D e r m o t t R d E V i c t o r y R d N L o c u s t G r o v e R d W P i n e A v e N S t a r R d E F r a n k l i n R d N E a g l e R d E O v e r l a n d R d W C h i n d e n B l v d In t e r s t a t e 8 4 E C o l u m b i a R d W E l G a t o Ln S S t o d d a r d R d N E 5 t h S t S R i d g e w o o d R d E C e n t r a l D r S H o w r y L n N Records W a y W L e g a c y L n E C h i n d e n B l v d W L a k e H a z e l R d W C h i n d e n B l v d Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n , I d a h o Le g e n d US B R L o c a t i o n Wa t e r w a y Wa t e r B o d y Ci t y B o u n d a r y Un i t e d S t a t e s B u r e a u o f R e c l a m a t i o n U n d e v e l o p e d 01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 0. 5 Mi l e s GRASP® Atlas USBR Undeveloped 0 Initial Inventory Date: 125.1Approximate Park Acreage: UndevelopedOwner: Modifiers with Scores Total Neighborhood GRASP® Score 2.2 Total Community GRASP® Score General Comments 1 Design and AmbianceDrinking Fountains 0Seating 0BBQ Grills 0Dog Pick-Up Station 0Security Lighting 0Bike Parking 0Restrooms 0Shade 0Trail Connection 0Park Access 0Parking 0Seasonal Plantings 0Ornamental Planting 0Picnic Tables Components with Score 2.2 MAPID Component Quantity Lights Neighborhood Score Community Score Comments L229 PARCEL 1 2 2 INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY ........................................................ 1 DEMOGRAPHICS ...................................................................................... 2 CURRENT FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS ............................................... 6 PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES, AND SPECIAL EVENTS .............................. 28 VALUES AND VISION ............................................................................. 32 FUTURE FACILITIES, AMENITIES, AND SERVICES ............................. 37 COMMUNICATION .................................................................................. 43 FINANCIAL CHOICES/FEES ................................................................... 44 ADDITIONAL OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS ............................................. 47 Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. DEMOGRAPHICS • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 1: Demographic Profile Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 20% 40% 60% Percent of Respondents Female Male Under 35 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75 or over Single, no children Couple, no children Single with children at home Couple with children at home Single, children no longer at home Couple, children no longer at home Under $25,000 $25,000-49,999 $50,000-74,999 $75,000-99,999 $100,000-149,999 $150,000-199,999 $200,000-249,999 $250,000 or more 76% 24% 63% 37% 37% 19% 15% 12% 9% 7% 19% 36% 24% 12% 8% 2% 57% 19% 7% 6% 5% 6% 62% 16% 6% 9% 6% 1% 13% 18% 25% 17% 20% 5% 2% 1% 13% 23% 24% 25% 1% 9% 3% 3% Demographic Profile Average Invitation Sample Open Link 45.9 49.9 Average Invitation Sample Open Link $100,217 $79,496 Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 2: Residential Profile Invitation Sample Open Link 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent of Respondents 0% 50% 100% Percent of Respondents Where in the city do you live? South (south of I-84) Central (between I-84 and Cherry Lane/Fairview Ave.) Northwest (west of Meridian Rd. and nort.. Northeast (east of Meridian Rd. and north of Fairview Ave.) Other Number of Years Lived in Meridian Less than 1 1 to 3 4 to 10 11 to 20 21 or more Own vs. Rent Own Rent Other Household Need for ADA- Accessible Facilities Yes No 25% 22% 32% 22% 20% 11% 32% 23% 14% 32% 48% 19% 1% 10% 38% 31% 15% 7% 87% 11% 2% 85% 6% 9% 12% 88% 94% 6% Residential Profile Average Invitation Sample Open Link 12.0 16.5 Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. CURRENT FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS Figure 3: Importance of and Familiarity with Local Recreation Opportunities Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 4: Use of and Satisfaction with Classes and Programs Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 5: Most Used Facilities/Parks Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents Settlers Park Storey Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Tully Park Bear Creek Park Renaissance Park Gordon Harris Park Jabil Fields Chateau Park City Hall Plaza Community Center Heroes Park Heritage Middle School Ball Fields Generations Plaza Centennial Park 8th Street Park Seasons Park Champion Park 70% 53% 46% 39% 17% 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 3% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 80% 26% 58% 28% 17% 14% 12% 8% 4% 3% 7% 4% 7% 5% 1% 3% 1% 3% Top Three MPRD Facilities & Parks Used Most Often Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 6: Most Used Facilities/Parks by Area of Residence Invitation Sample Only Central Northeast Northwest South 0% 50% Percent of Respondents 0% 50% 100% Percent of Respondents 0% 50% 100% Percent of Respondents 20% 40% 60% Percent of Respondents Settlers Park Storey Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Tully Park Bear Creek Park Renaissance Park Gordon Harris Park Jabil Fields Chateau Park City Hall Plaza Community Center Heroes Park Heritage Middle School Ball Fields Generations Plaza Centennial Park 8th Street Park Seasons Park Champion Park 3% 0% 6% 5% 4% 8% 7% 6% 4% 5% 1% 3% 1% 6% 48% 39% 62% 67% 1% 1% 6% 10% 7% 22% 1% 1% 5% 32% 60% 49% 77% 4% 6% 1% 2% 6% 14% 3% 61% 36% 65% 86% 2% 0% 0% 4% 1% 0% 14% 3% 5% 1% 2% 24% 27% 52% 8% 48% 34% 47% Top Three MPRD Facilities & Parks Used Most Often - by Area of Residence Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 7: Most Used Facilities/Parks by Household Status Invitation Sample Only Children Present in Home No Children Present in Home 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Respondents Settlers Park Storey Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Tully Park Bear Creek Park Renaissance Park Gordon Harris Park Jabil Fields Chateau Park City Hall Plaza Community Center Heroes Park Heritage Middle School Ball Fields Generations Plaza Centennial Park 8th Street Park Seasons Park Champion Park 2% 1% 2% 0% 4% 7% 4% 1% 8% 8% 7% 9% 17% 45% 42% 51% 80% 3% 2% 4% 8% 3% 1% 6% 15% 2% 0% 7% 3% 16% 27% 51% 54% 51% Top Three MPRD Facilities & Parks Used Most Often - by Presence of Children in Household Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 8: Importance of Facilities Operated by MPRD – Percent Important vs. Not Important Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent of Respondents Pathways/Trails Playgrounds Picnic Shelters Community/Recreation Center Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Indoor Gym Space Splash Pads Athletic Fields Outdoor Basketball Courts Tennis Courts Ball Fields Dog Parks Rodeo Grounds 82% 7% 77% 12% 69% 19% 56% 16% 56% 16% 49% 24% 48% 30% 43% 26% 43% 32% 37% 37% 31% 29% 31% 35% 14% 62% Importance of Facilities Operated by MPRD - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Important) vs. % 1 & 2 (Not Important) Percent 4 & 5 (Important) Percent 1 & 2 (Not Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 9: Importance of Facilities Operated by MPRD – Average Rating Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating Pathways/Trails Playgrounds Picnic Shelters Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Community/ Recreation Center Indoor Gym Space Splash Pads Athletic Fields Outdoor Basketball Courts Ball Fields Tennis Courts Dog Parks Rodeo Grounds 4.2 4.4 4.1 4.1 3.8 4.1 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.3 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.8 3.1 3.1 2.9 3.2 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.2 2.1 Importance of Facilities Operated by MPRD Average Rating (1=Not at all Important, 5=Very Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 10: Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by Facilities Operated by MPRD – Percent Needs Met vs. Needs Unmet Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent of Respondents Playgrounds Athletic Fields Ball Fields Picnic Shelters Splash Pads Outdoor Basketball Courts Community/ Recreation Center Pathways/Trails Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Dog Parks Rodeo Grounds Tennis Courts Indoor Gym Space 84% 4% 73% 10% 69% 5% 67% 4% 59% 14% 57% 17% 55% 25% 50% 28% 44% 30% 41% 31% 38% 34% 38% 11% 25% 47% Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by MPRD Facilities - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Needs Met) vs. % 1 & 2 (Needs Unmet) Percent 4 & 5 (Needs Met) Percent 1 & 2 (Needs Unmet) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 11: Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by Facilities Operated by MPRD – Average Rating Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Needs Met Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Needs Met Rating Playgrounds Picnic Shelters Athletic Fields Ball Fields Splash Pads Outdoor Basketball Courts Tennis Courts Pathways/Trails Community/ Recreation Center Dog Parks Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Rodeo Grounds Indoor Gym Space 4.3 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.0 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.8 Degree to Which Household Needs Are Met by MPRD Facilities Average Rating (1=Not at all, 5=Completely) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 12: Current Facilities – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix Invitation Sample Only 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 How Well Needs Are Currently Being Met (Average Rating) 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities Splash Pads Rodeo Grounds Picnic Shelters Outdoor Basketball Courts Community/Rec. Center Ball Fields Athletic Fields Tennis Courts Playgrounds Pathways/Trails Indoor Gym Space Dog Parks Fac Imp Fac Needs High Importance/ Low Needs Met High Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ Low Needs Met Level of Importance vs. Needs Met for Current MPRD Facilities - Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 13: Importance of Programs Operated by MPRD – Percent Important vs. Not Important Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Percent of Respondents Family Programs (All Ages) Youth Sports Youth Programs (Non-Sports) Senior Programs Outdoor Adventure Programs Youth Camps Teen Programs Adult Programs (Non-Sports) Adult Sports 69% 14% 64% 15% 57% 18% 50% 30% 50% 14% 41% 24% 40% 24% 36% 16% 31% 34% Importance of Programs Operated by MPRD - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Important) vs. % 1 & 2 (Not Important) Percent 4 & 5 (Important) Percent 1 & 2 (Not Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 14: Importance of Programs Operated by MPRD – Average Rating Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating Youth Sports Family Programs (All Ages) Outdoor Adventure Programs Youth Programs (Non-Sports) Senior Programs Adult Programs (Non-Sports) Youth Camps Teen Programs Adult Sports 3.7 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.5 2.9 3.6 Importance of Programs Operated by MPRD Average Rating (1=Not at all Important, 5=Very Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 15: Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by MPRD Programs – Percent Needs Met vs. Needs Unmet Invitation Sample Only 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% Percent of Respondents Senior Programs Youth Programs (Non-Sports) Adult Sports Youth Sports Teen Programs Family Programs (All Ages) Adult Programs (Non-Sports) Youth Camps Outdoor Adventure Programs 65% 11% 63% 6% 62% 8% 60% 6% 60% 9% 57% 12% 54% 9% 51% 9% 50% 14% Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by MPRD Programs - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Needs Met) vs. % 1 & 2 (Needs Unmet) Percent 4 & 5 (Needs Met) Percent 1 & 2 (Needs Unmet) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 16: Degree to Which Household Needs are Met by MPRD Programs – Average Rating Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Needs Met Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Needs Met Rating Youth Programs (Non-Sports) Youth Sports Senior Programs Adult Sports Teen Programs Youth Camps Adult Programs (Non-Sports) Family Programs (All Ages) Outdoor Adventure Programs 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.3 3.7 3.4 3.6 3.2 3.6 3.3 3.6 3.2 3.6 3.3 3.4 3.1 Degree to Which Household Needs Are Met by MPRD Programs Average Rating (1=Not at all, 5=Completely) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 17: Current Programs – Importance vs. Needs Met Matrix Invitation Sample Only 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 How Well Needs Are Currently Being Met (Average Rating) 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 Youth Sports Youth Programs Youth Camps Family Programs Adult Programs Teen Programs Senior Programs Outdoor Adventure Programs Adult Sports Prog Needs Prog Imp High Importance/ Low Needs Met High Importance/ High Needs Met Low Importance/ Low Needs Met Low Importance/ High Needs Met Level of Importance vs. Needs Met for Current MPRD Programs - Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES, AND SPECIAL EVENTS Figure 18: Household Need for Programs Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Respondents Community events Swim lessons/aquatic programs Fitness and wellness programs Summer camps - youth Family programs Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Adult programs (non-sports) Cooking/enrichment classes After school programs Youth sports camps Arts programs Volunteer opportunities Performing arts programs Athletic leagues - adult Outdoor adventure programs Teen programs Youth programs (non-sports) Intergenerational programs Adaptive recreation programs 70% 54% 52% 44% 44% 41% 34% 34% 32% 31% 30% 30% 28% 27% 27% 22% 21% 18% 7% 5% Household Need for Programs - Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 19: Household Need for Programs by Household Status Invitation Sample Only Children Present in Home No Children Present in Home 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percent of Respondents Community events Swim lessons/aquatic programs Fitness and wellness programs Summer camps - youth Family programs Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Adult programs (non-sports) Cooking/enrichment classes After school programs Youth sports camps Arts programs Volunteer opportunities Performing arts programs Athletic leagues - adult Outdoor adventure programs Teen programs Youth programs (non-sports) Intergenerational programs Adaptive recreation programs 73% 68% 52% 62% 51% 59% 17% 21% 34% 41% 43% 34% 26% 30% 35% 24% 30% 23% 6% 4% 64% 27% 52% 12% 30% 67% 58% 28% 12% 21% 31% 22% 11% 18% 10% 7% 7% 4% 8% 8% Household Need for Programs - by Presence of Children in Household Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 20: Top Three Most Important Programs to Add, Expand, or Improve Invitation Sample Only 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% Invitation Sample Community events Fitness and wellness programs Family programs Swim lessons/aquatic programs Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Teen programs Cooking/enrichment classes Adult programs (non-sports) Performing arts programs Volunteer opportunities Summer camps - youth Youth programs (non-sports) Athletic leagues - adult Outdoor adventure programs Youth sports camps Adaptive recreation programs Arts programs After school programs Intergenerational programs 21% 11% 16% 11% 14% 17% 10% 13% 12% 10% 7% 9% 3% 5% 8% 8% 7% 4% 5% 6% 4% 6% 7% 7% 4% 4% 3% 5% 6% 42% 31% 31% 28% 26% 19% 13% 12% 11% 10% 10% 9% 8% 7% 7% 6% 6% 5% 5% 2% Top Three Most Important Programs to Household - Invitation Sample Only Most Important Program Second Most Important Program Third Most Important Program Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 21: Top Three Most Important Programs to Add, Expand, or Improve Combined Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Percent of Respondents Community events Fitness and wellness programs Family programs Swim lessons/aquatic programs Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Teen programs Cooking/enrichment classes Adult programs (non-sports) Performing arts programs Volunteer opportunities Summer camps - youth Youth programs (non-sports) Athletic leagues - adult Outdoor adventure programs Youth sports camps Adaptive recreation programs Arts programs After school programs Intergenerational programs 2% 5% 5% 6% 6% 7% 7% 8% 9% 10% 10% 11% 12% 13% 19% 26% 28% 31% 31% 42% 1% 4% 10% 3% 9% 11% 22% 7% 14% 7% 10% 10% 9% 9% 13% 37% 31% 18% 24% 36% Top Three Most Important Programs to Household Combined Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. VALUES AND VISION Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 22: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Invitation Sample Only 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% Invitation Sample Pathway connectivity Promoting healthy, active lifestyles Family-oriented activities Maintenance of parks and facilities Safety and security Community-wide special events Aquatic facilities/programming Developing new parks in under-served areas Expanded classes and programs for all ages Balance of organized sports and passive park facilities Land preservation/acquisition Accessibility Public art and landscaped areas Volunteer opportunities Customer service Leveraging partnerships 33% 11% 12% 11% 14% 13% 13% 14% 13% 10% 4% 3% 8% 8% 5% 9% 7% 8% 3% 4% 4% 3% 9% 4% 3% 5% 7% 4% 5% 5% 6% 4% 3% 44% 33% 30% 25% 25% 25% 24% 16% 16% 16% 11% 8% 5% 4% 3% 2% Top Three Community Issues for MPRD - Invitation Sample Only Top Community Issue for Parks & Rec. Second Community Issue for Parks & Rec. Third Community Issue for Parks & Rec. Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 23: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined Invitation Sample Only Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Respondents Pathway connectivity Promoting healthy, active lifestyles Family-oriented activities Maintenance of parks and facilities Safety and security Community-wide special events Aquatic facilities/programming Developing new parks in under-served areas Expanded classes and programs for all ages Balance of organized sports and passive park facilities Land preservation/acquisition Accessibility Public art and landscaped areas Volunteer opportunities Customer service Leveraging partnerships 44% 33% 30% 25% 25% 25% 24% 16% 16% 16% 11% 8% 5% 4% 3% 2% 53% 17% 30% 25% 16% 17% 28% 29% 12% 22% 15% 4% 5% 5% 1% 2% Top Three Community Issues for MPRD Combined Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 24: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined by Area of Residence Invitation Sample Only Central Northeast Northwest South 0% 80% Percent of Respondents 0% 50% Percent of Respondents 0% 20% 40% Percent of Respondents 20% 40% 60% Percent of Respondents Pathway connectivity Promoting healthy, active lifestyles Family-oriented activities Maintenance of parks and facilities Safety and security Community-wide special events Aquatic facilities/programming Developing new parks in under-served areas Expanded classes and programs for all ages Balance of organized sports and passive park facilities Land preservation/acquisition Accessibility Public art and landscaped areas Volunteer opportunities Customer service Leveraging partnerships 52% 21% 26% 23% 28% 16% 32% 13% 13% 14% 16% 7% 7% 6% 7% 5% 44% 61% 39% 16% 44% 33% 17% 11% 4% 8% 3% 7% 5% 6% 3% 34% 36% 36% 22% 32% 34% 22% 19% 8% 8% 9% 8% 3% 3% 1% 50% 16% 18% 38% 21% 16% 26% 38% 10% 18% 16% 7% 4% 3% 2% 5% Top Three Community Issues for MPRD Combined - by Area of Residence Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 25: Top Three Areas MPRD Should Focus on Improving Combined by Household Status Invitation Sample Only Children Present in Home No Children Present in Home 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents Pathway connectivity Promoting healthy, active lifestyles Family-oriented activities Maintenance of parks and facilities Safety and security Community-wide special events Aquatic facilities/programming Developing new parks in under-served areas Expanded classes and programs for all ages Balance of organized sports and passive park facilities Land preservation/acquisition Accessibility Public art and landscaped areas Volunteer opportunities Customer service Leveraging partnerships 46% 38% 36% 25% 19% 24% 30% 16% 17% 16% 9% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 41% 25% 19% 24% 35% 27% 13% 18% 15% 14% 14% 15% 9% 6% 6% 1% Top Three Community Issues for MPRD Combined - by Presence of Children in Household Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. FUTURE FACILITIES, AMENITIES, AND SERVICES Figure 26: Three Areas that, if Addressed, Would Increase Your Use of MPRD Facilities Invitation Sample Only 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% Percent of Respondents Awareness of programs (communications) Shade Additional facilities and amenities Pricing/user fees Accessibility Safety and security Parking Condition/maintenance of parks or buildings Quality of equipment Programs I want Customer service/staff knowledge Hours of operation 3% 3% 6% 8% 9% 12% 15% 19% 20% 38% 51% 55% What are the three most important areas that, if addressed by the City, would in- crease your utilization of MPRD facilities? - Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • o o o o o • o o o o o o o o o o o o o Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 27: Importance of Adding/Expanding/Improving MPRD Facilities – Percent Important vs. Not Important Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Respondents Community/Recreation Center Indoor Aquatics Facility Ice Rink Fieldhouse/Gymnasium Space Performing Arts Center 12% 62% 12% 62% 31% 41% 18% 38% 17% 36% Indoor Facilities Importance of Potential Future Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved - Invitation Sample Only % 4 & 5 (Important) vs. % 1 & 2 (Not Important) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Respondents Shade Structures in Parks Pathways & Trails Improved Park Amenities Playgrounds Lights for Outdoor Athletic Facilities Fishing Ponds Public Art in the Parks Splash Pads Dog Parks Exercise Stations Along Trails in Parks New Parks Outdoor Athletic Fields/Courts Parking at Recreational Facilities Disc Golf Rodeo/Equestrian Facility Pickleball Courts 78% 6% 78% 5% 11% 70% 11% 65% 17% 49% 30% 42% 27% 40% 25% 40% 33% 39% 26% 39% 18% 33% 20% 31% 25% 28% 37% 20% 52% 9% 43% 7% Outdoor Facilities Percent 4 & 5 (Important) Percent 1 & 2 (Not Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 28: Importance of Adding/Expanding/Improving MPRD Facilities – Average Rating Invitation Sample Only Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating Indoor Aquatics Facility Community/Recreation Center Fieldhouse/Gymnasium Space Performing Arts Center Ice Rink 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.7 Indoor Invitation Sample Open Link 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Average Importance Rating Pathways & Trails Shade Structures in Parks Improved Park Amenities Playgrounds Lights for Outdoor Athletic Facilities New Parks Exercise Stations Along Trails in Parks Splash Pads Outdoor Athletic Fields/Courts Public Art in the Parks Fishing Ponds Parking at Recreational Facilities Dog Parks Disc Golf Pickleball Courts Rodeo/Equestrian Facility 4.1 4.3 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.4 3.8 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.3 3.1 3.7 3.1 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.1 3.7 3.0 3.1 2.6 2.9 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.1 Outdoor Importance of Potential Future Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Average Rating (1=Not at all Important, 5=Very Important) Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 29: Top Three Most Important Facilities to Add, Expand, or Improve Invitation Sample Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Invitation Sample Pathways & trails Indoor aquatics facility Community/recreation center Improved park amenities Shade structures in parks Dog parks Playgrounds Outdoor athletic fields/courts Fishing ponds New parks Exercise stations along trails in parks Ice rink Performing arts center Public Art in the Parks Splash pads Lights for outdoor athletic facilities Disc golf Parking at recreational facilities Fieldhouse/gymnasium space Other (indoor or outdoor) Rodeo/equestrian facility No second or third priority listed Pickleball courts 14% 11% 16% 10% 11% 21% 14% 13% 14% 7% 4% 5% 4% 7% 7% 7% 6% 3% 5% 6% 4% 7% 8% 5% 6% 9% 4% 4% 2% 49% 33% 26% 22% 22% 18% 16% 13% 12% 11% 11% 10% 9% 8% 8% 6% 5% 5% 4% 4% 3% 2% 1% Top Three Indoor & Outdoor Facilities to Add, Expand, or Improve - Invitation Sam- ple Only Highest Priority to Be Added/Expanded/Improved Second Priority to Be Added/Expanded/Improved Third Priority to Be Added/Expanded/Improved Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 30: Top Three Most Important Facilities to Add, Expand, or Improve Combined Invitation Sample Open Link 0% 20% 40% 60% Percent of Respondents 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Respondents Pathways & trails Indoor aquatics facility Community/recreation center Improved park amenities Shade structures in parks Dog parks Playgrounds Outdoor athletic fields/courts Fishing ponds New parks Exercise stations along trails in parks Ice rink Performing arts center Public Art in the Parks Splash pads Lights for outdoor athletic facilities Disc golf Parking at recreational facilities Fieldhouse/gymnasium space Other (indoor or outdoor) Rodeo/equestrian facility Pickleball courts 49% 33% 26% 22% 22% 18% 16% 13% 12% 11% 11% 10% 9% 8% 8% 6% 5% 5% 4% 4% 3% 1% 43% 34% 21% 27% 18% 20% 17% 11% 13% 13% 17% 5% 6% 5% 9% 5% 8% 7% 7% 2% 1% 4% Top Three Indoor & Outdoor Facilities to Add, Expand, or Improve Combined Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. COMMUNICATION Figure 31: Current Methods of Receiving Information and Best Method for Reaching You Invitation Sample Only Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. FINANCIAL CHOICES/FEES Figure 32: How do you feel about the current program and facility fees charged by MPRD? Current Facility Fees Current Program Fees 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Respondents 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Respondents Fees are underpriced for the value received Fees are acceptable for the value received Fees are too high for the value received Don't know/ unsure 2% 2% 1% 2% 30% 48% 29% 54% 11% 7% 14% 8% 57% 43% 56% 36% How do you feel about the current program and facility fees charged directly to you by MPRD? Invitation Sample Open Link Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 33: Potential Impact of Fee Increases on Current Level of Participation Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. Figure 34: Allocation of Funding Towards Facilities/Services/Programs – Average Allocation Amount Invitation Sample Open Link $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 Average Amount Allocated $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 Average Amount Allocated Expand aquatics Add more pathways Make improvements and/or renovate and maintain existing park facilities Expand programs and activities Recreation center Add new parks Add outdoor athletic fields and courts New or expanded Community Center Provide more City-wide special events Other enhancements $17.69 $11.29 $19.44 $12.62 $8.75 $8.63 $6.16 $3.27 $7.14 $5.02 $16.29 $10.79 $16.84 $11.74 $10.91 $5.85 $5.79 $6.59 $5.37 $9.82 If you had $100 to spend on parks and recreation facilities, services, and/or pro- grams, how would you allocate that $100 across the following categories? Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. ADDITIONAL OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Meridian Parks and Recreation Survey RRC Associates, Inc. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan Park and Recreation Influencing Trends The following information highlights relevant regional, and national outdoor recreation trends from various sources that may influence the City of Meridian’s recreation planning for the next several years. Demographic Trends in Recreation Adult – The Millennial Generation The 25-34 age range represents potential adult program participants. Many in this age group are beginning long-term relationships and establishing families. The Millennial Generation, generally considered to represent those born between about 1980 and 1999 (ages 16 – 35). Twenty-five percent of the population in Meridian is included within the Millennial Generation. In their book, Millennials Rising, the Next Great Generation, authors William Strauss and Neil Howe identify seven Millennials characteristics 1. These characteristics were discussed in a 2010 California State Parks Bulletin article entitled “Here come the ‘Millennials’: What You Need to Know to Connect with this New Generation”: 1. Special: Used to receiving rewards just for participating, Millennials are raised to feel special. 2. Sheltered: Millennials lead structured lives filled with rules and regulations. Less accustomed to unstructured play than previous generations and apprehensive of the outdoors, they spend most of their time indoors, leaving home primarily to socialize with friends and families. 3. Team Oriented: This group has a “powerful instinct for community” and places a “High value on teamwork and belonging”. 4. Confident (and technologically savvy): Upbeat and with a can-do attitude, this generation is more ”optimistic and tech-savvy than their elders”. 5. Pressured: Millennials feel “pressured to achieve and pressured to behave”. They have been “pushed to study hard and avoid personal risk”. 6. Achieving: This generation is expected to do great things, and they may be the next “great” generation. 7. Conventional (and diverse): Millennials are respectful of authority and civic minded. Respectful of cultural differences because they are ethnically diverse, they also value good conduct and tend to have a “standardized appearance”. The California State Parks article provides a broad range of ideas for engaging Millennials in parks and recreation2. The highest ranking age cohort in Meridian in 2014 was 35 – 44 (15% of the population) followed by the 45 - 54 and 25 – 34 age cohorts (12.8% and 12.5% of the population, respectively). Planning for the next ten years suggests a growing demand for programs and services for baby boomers and senior adults (the 55 – 74 age range is predicted to grow by 2.9% by 2019). 2 Adult – The Baby Boomers Baby boomers are defined as individuals born between 1946 and 1964, as stated in Leisure Programming for Baby Boomers 3. They are a generation that consists of nearly 76 million Americans. In 2011, this influential population began their transition out of the workforce. As baby boomers enter retirement, they will be looking for opportunities in fitness, sports, outdoors, arts and cultural events, and other activities that suit their lifestyles. With their varied life experiences, values, and expectations, baby boomers are predicted to redefine the meaning of recreation and leisure programming for mature adults. Emilyn Sheffield, Professor of Recreation and Parks Management at the California State University, at Chico, in the NPRA July 2012 Parks and Recreation magazine article titled, “Five Trends Shaping Tomorrow Today,” indicated that Baby Boomers are driving the aging of America with boomers and seniors over 65 composing about 39 percent of the nation’s population 4. In the leisure profession, this generation’s devotion to exercise and fitness is an example of its influence on society. When boomers entered elementary school, President John Kennedy initiated the President's Council on Physical Fitness; physical education and recreation became a key component of public education. As boomers matured and moved into the workplace, they took their desire for exercise and fitness with them. Now as the oldest boomers are nearing 65, park and recreation professionals are faced with new approaches to provide both passive and active programming for older adults. Boomers are second only to Gen Y/Millennials in participation in fitness and outdoor sports.5 Jeffrey Ziegler, a past president of the Arizona Parks and Recreation Association identified “Boomer Basics” in his article, "Recreating retirement: how will baby boomers reshape leisure in their 60s?"6Highlights are summarized below. Boomer Basics: Boomers are known to work hard, play hard, and spend hard. They have always been fixated with all things youthful. Boomers typically respond that they feel 10 years younger than their chronological age. Their nostalgic mindset keeps boomers returning to the sights and sounds of their 1960s youth culture. Swimming pools have become less of a social setting and much more of an extension of boomers' health and wellness program. Because boomers have, in general, a high education level they'll likely continue to pursue education as adults and into retirement. Boomers will look to park and recreation professionals to give them opportunities to enjoy many life-long hobbies and sports. When programming for this age group, a customized experience to cater to the need for self-fulfillment, healthy pleasure, nostalgic youthfulness, and individual escapes will be important. Recreation trends will shift from games and activities that boomers associate with senior citizens, as Ziegler suggests that activities such as bingo, bridge, and shuffleboard will likely be avoided because boomers relate these activities to being old. Boomers will reinvent what being a 65-year-old means. Parks and recreation agencies that don't plan for boomers carrying on in retirement with the same hectic pace they've lived during their In 2010, Baby Boomers represented 17 percent of the population in Meridian (those approximately 51 – 64 years of age). 3 years in employment will be left behind. Things to consider when planning for the demographic shift: • Boomer characteristics • What drives Boomers? • Marketing to Boomers • Arts and entertainment • Passive and active fitness trends • Outdoor recreation/adventure programs • Travel programs Youth - Planning for the Demographic Shift Emilyn Sheffield also identified as one of the five trends shaping tomorrow today that the proportion of youth is smaller than in the past, but still essential to our future. As of the 2010 Census, the age group under age 18 forms about a quarter of the U.S. population, and this percentage is at an all-time low. Nearly half of this population group is ethnically diverse and 25% is Hispanic. Multiculturalism Our country is becoming increasingly racially and ethnically diverse. In May 2012, the U.S. Census Bureau announced that non-white babies now account for the majority of births in the United States. “This is an important tipping point," said William H. Frey7, the senior demographer at the Brookings Institution, describing the shift as a "transformation from a mostly white baby boomer culture to the more globalized multi-ethnic country that we are becoming." Cultural and ethnic diversity adds a unique flavor to communities expressed through distinct neighborhoods, multicultural learning environments, restaurants, places of worship, museums, and nightlife. 8 As the recreation field continues to function within a more diverse society, race and ethnicity will become increasingly important in every aspect of the profession. More than ever, recreation professionals will be expected to work with, and have significant knowledge and understanding of, individuals from many cultural, racial, and ethnic backgrounds. • Outdoor Participation varies by Ethnicity: Participation in outdoor activities is higher among Caucasians than any other ethnicity and lowest among African Americans in nearly all age groups. • Lack of interest reason for not participating: When asked who they did not participate in outdoor activities more often, the number one reason given by people of all ethnicities and races was because they were not interested. • Most popular outdoor activities: Biking, running, fishing, and camping were the most popular outdoor activities for all Americans, with each ethnic/racial group participating in each in varying degrees. While the City of Meridian has an overwhelmingly Caucasian population (91.3 percent in 2014), Meridian’s demographic profile indicates that 2 percent of the population is Asian and .8 percent, African American. Additionally, 7.5 percent of the population is of Hispanic origin (irrespective of race). 4 Recreational Preferences among Ethnic/Racial Groups (Self-Identifying): Nationwide participation in outdoor sports in 2013 was highest among Caucasians in all age groups and lowest among African-Americans, according to the 2014 Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 9. The biggest difference in participation rates was between Caucasian and African American adolescents, with 65 percent of Caucasians ages 13 – 17 participating and only 42 percent of African Americans in this age range participating. African-Americans African American youth ages 6 – 12 (52% participation), are the only age group in this demographic to participate in outdoor recreation at a rate of more than 50 percent. By comparison, Caucasians in four of the five age groupings participated in outdoor sports at rates of 60 percent or more, with only those aged 45+ (40% participation) participating at under 50 percent. According to the 2014 Outdoor Recreation Participation Report, the most popular outdoor activities among African-Americans are: running/jogging and trail running (18%); fishing (freshwater, saltwater and fly) (11%); road and mountain biking and BMX (11%); birdwatching/wildlife viewing (4%); and, camping (car, backyard, backpacking and RV) (4%). Asian-Americans Research about outdoor recreation among Asian-Americans in the San Francisco Bay Area (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Filipino)10 found significant differences among the four groups concerning the degree of linguistic acculturation (preferred language spoken in various communication media). The research suggests that communications related to recreation and natural resource management should appear in ethnic media, but the results also suggest that Asian Americans should not be viewed as homogeneous with regard to recreation related issues. Another study 11 found that technology use for finding outdoor recreation opportunities is highest among Asian/Pacific Islander populations. Over 60 percent of these populations use stationary or mobile technology in making decisions regarding outdoor recreation. According to the 2014 Outdoor Recreation Participation Report, the most popular outdoor activities among Asian/Pacific Islanders are: running/jogging and trail running (24%); hiking (15%); road and mountain biking and BMX (14%); camping (car, backyard, backpacking, and RV) (11%); and, fishing (freshwater, saltwater and fly) (10%). Caucasians According to the 2014 Outdoor Recreation Participation Report, the most popular outdoor activities among Caucasians are: running/ jogging and trail running (19%); fishing (freshwater, saltwater and fly) (18%); road and mountain biking and BMX (17%); camping (car, backyard, backpacking and RV) (16%); and, hiking (14%). Hispanics In the United States, the Hispanic population increased by 43 percent over the last decade, compared to five percent for the non-Hispanic population, and accounted for more than half of all the population growth. According to Emilyn Sheffield, Professor of Recreation and Parks Management at the California State University at Chico, the growing racial and ethnic diversity is particularly important to recreation and leisure service providers, as family and individual recreation patterns and preferences are strongly shaped by cultural influences.12 5 Participation in outdoor sports among those who identify as Hispanic is at 7% nationwide, according to the 2013 Outdoor Recreation Participation Report.13 Those who do get outdoors, however, participate more frequently than other outdoor participants, with an average of 43 outings per year. Hispanic youth (ages 6 – 17) are the most likely age group to participate in outdoor recreation, in the Hispanic demographic, followed closely by those in the 25-44 age range. The most popular outdoor activities among Hispanics are: running and jogging (22%); road and mountain biking and BMX (17%); fishing (freshwater, saltwater and fly) (14%); Camping (car, backyard and RV) (11%); and, hiking (9%). Multiculturalism and Marketing Today the marketplace for consumers has dramatically evolved in the United States from a largely Anglo demographic, to the reality that the United States has shifted to a large minority consumer base known as “new majority.” The San Jose Group, a consortium of marketing communications companies specializing in reaching Hispanic and non-Hispanic markets of the United States, suggests that today’s multicultural population of the United States, or the “new majority,” is 107.6 million, which translates to about 35.1 percent of the country’s total population. The United States’ multicultural population alone could essentially be the 12th largest country in the world14. Parks and recreation trends in marketing leisure services continue to emerge and should be taken into consideration in all planning efforts, as different cultures respond differently to marketing techniques. Facilities According to Recreation Management’s “2014 State of the Industry Report,”15 national trends show an increased user-base of recreation facilities (private and public). Additionally, parks and recreation providers responding to the survey indicated an average age of 23.8 years for their community recreation facilities. To meet that growing need, a majority of the parks and recreation survey respondents (69 percent) reported that they have plans to build new facilities or make additions or renovations to their existing facilities over the next three years. Nearly one-third (32.5 percent) of parks respondents said they have plans to build new facilities, and 28.9 percent said they plan to add to their existing facilities. More than half (52.2) percent are planning renovations to existing facilities. The current national trend is toward “one-stop” indoor recreation facilities to serve all ages. Large, multi-purpose regional centers help increase cost recovery, promote retention, and encourage cross-use. Agencies across the U.S. are increasing revenue production and cost recovery. Multi-use facilities verses specialized space is a trend, offering programming opportunities as well as free-play opportunities. “One stop” facilities attract young families, teens, and adults of all ages. Also according to the 2014 State of the Industry Report (p. 56), “parks and recreation departments continue to see a slow recovery from the lowest points of the recent recession”. While 69 percent plan for construction for parks, the average amount planned for construction in the 2014 budgets saw a slight decrease of 4.5 percent from an average of $3,973,000 in last year's survey to an average of $3,795.000 for 2014. There was very little change in the types of features and amenities included in the facilities of the survey respondents from last year to this 6 year. The most commonly found features include splash play areas, trails, dog parks, park structures (shelters and restroom buildings); playgrounds; disc golf courses, open spaces (gardens, natural areas), synthetic turf sports fields; and concession areas. Aquatics/Water Recreation Trends According to the National Sporting Goods Association (NSGA), swimming ranked third nation- wide in terms of participation in 2012.16 Outdoor swimming pools are not typically heated and open year round. Swimming for fitness is the top aspirational activity for “inactives” in 6 of 8 age categories in the SFIA “2013 Sports, Fitness and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report”, representing a significant opportunity to engage inactive populations. Nationally, there is an increasing trend towards indoor leisure and therapeutic pools. Additional indoor and outdoor amenities like “spray pads” are becoming increasingly popular as well. In some cities and counties spray pools are popular in the summer months and turn into ice rinks in the winter months. The 2014 Outdoor Recreation Participation Topline Report provided nation-wide trends for various outdoor activities, including the following water recreation activities: board sailing/windsurfing, canoeing, fishing, kayaking, rafting, sailing, stand-up paddling, and wakeboarding (Table 1). Among water recreation activities, stand up paddling has had the largest increase in participation in the past three years (23.9% increase) followed by several varieties of the kayaking experience: kayak fishing (20% increase), recreational kayaking (11.1%) and whitewater kayaking (6.6% increase). Fly fishing participation is up while other fishing activities are down in the past three years. Sailing participation has increased somewhat over the past three years, while rafting participation is down.17 Table 1: Water Recreation Participation by Activity (in thousands) (6 years of age or older) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 3 Year Average Change Boardsailing/Windsurfing 1,128 1,607 1,151 1,593 1,324 -2.4% Canoeing 10,058 10,553 9,787 9,839 10,153 -1.2% Fishing (Fly) 5,568 5,478 5,360 6,012 5,878 2.4% Fishing (Freshwater/ Other) 40,961 38,860 39,071 39,135 37,796 -0.9% Kayak Fishing no data 1,044 1,201 1,409 1,798 20% Kayaking (Recreational) 6,212 6,465 8,229 8,144 8,716 11.1% Kayaking (White Water) 1,369 1,842 1,546 1,878 2,146 6.6% Rafting 4,318 4,460 3,821 3,690 3,836 -4.6% Sailing 4,342 3,869 3,725 3,958 3,915 -.5% Stand Up Paddling no data 1,050 1,242 1,542 1,993 23.9% Wakeboarding 3,577 3,645 3,389 3,348 3,316 -3.1% Source: Outdoor Foundation 2014 (numbers in thousands). 7 Dog Parks Dog parks continue to see high popularity and have remained among the top planned addition to parks and recreational facilities over the past three years. 2014 saw the addition of a new association dedicated to providing informational resources for starting and maintaining dog parks, the National Dog Park Association. Recreation Magazine 18 suggests that dog parks can represent a relatively low-cost way to provide an oft-visited a popular community amenity. Dog parks can be as simple as a gated area, or more elaborate with “designed-for-dogs” amenities like water fountains, agility equipment, and pet wash stations, to name a few. According to Dog Fancy Magazine, an ideal dog park should include the following: • One acre or more surrounded by a 4- to 6-foot fence • Shade and water • Adequate drainage • Parking near the site • A double gated entry • Benches • Pet-waste disposal stations with pickup bags and covered waste receptacles Fitness Programming There have been many changes in fitness programs in the last fifteen years. What clients wanted in 2000 is not necessarily what they want today. The American College of Sports Medicine’s (ACSM’s) Health and Fitness Journal 19 has conducted an annual survey since 2007 to determine trends that would help create a standard for health and fitness programming. Table 2 shows survey results that focus on trends in the commercial, corporate, clinical, and community health and fitness industry. Some trends first identified in 2007 have stayed near the top of the list year after year while others came and went in popularity. Zumba made a brief appearance on the top 10 in 2012 but has fallen off the list of top 20 in 2014. Body weight training appeared as a developing trend in 2014 and is projected to stay strong in 2015 as is high-intensity interval training. Yoga is regaining popularity after falling out of the top 20 in 2009 and staying out of the top 10 until 2014. Fitness programs for older adults will remain strong in 2014 and 2015. Table 2: Top 10 Worldwide Fitness Trends for 2007 and Predicted Trends for 2015 2007 Trends for 2015 1.Children and obesity 1. Body weight training 2.Special fitness programs for older adults 2 High-intensity interval training 3.Educated and experienced fitness professionals 3. Educated and experienced fitness professionals 4. Functional fitness 4. Strength training 5. Core training 5 Personal training 6 Strength training 6. Exercise and weight loss 7. Personal training 7. Yoga 8. Mind/Body Exercise 8. Fitness programs for older adults 9 Exercise and weight loss 9 Functional fitness 10. Outcome measurements 10. Group personal training Source: American College of Sport Medicine 8 General Programming One of the most common concerns in the recreation industry is creating innovative programming to draw participants into facilities and services. Once in, participants recognize that the benefits are endless. According to Recreation Management’s “2014 State of the Industry Report,”20 the most common programs, offered by survey respondents, include holiday events and other special events (78.1%), youth sports teams (69.1%), day camps and summer camps (64.7%), adult sports teams (61.3%), arts and crafts (60.9%), educational programs (60.5%), sports tournaments and races (56.8%), programs for active older adults (55.2%), fitness programs (61.4%),.and festivals and concerts (53.2). The report also suggested more than three in 10 (35.7%) respondents indicated that they are planning to add additional programs at their facilities over the next three years. The most common types of programming they are planning to add include: 1. Programming for active older adults (up from No. 5 on the 2013 survey) 2. Fitness programs (up from No. 3) 3. Teen programming (down from No. 2) 4. Adult sports teams (did not appear in 2013) 5. Holiday events and other special events (up from No. 6) 6. Mind-body/balance programs – yoga, tai chi, Pilates or martial arts (up from No. 7) 7. Environmental education (down from No. 1) 8. Educational programs (up from No. 4) 9. Festivals and concerts (up from No. 10) 10. Sports tournaments or races (down from No. 8) Older Adults and Senior Programming The American Academy of Sports Medicine issues a yearly survey of the top 20 fitness trends 21 It ranks senior fitness programs eighth among most popular fitness trends for 2015. Whether it's SilverSneakers, a freestyle low-impact cardio class, or water aerobics, more and more people are realizing the many benefits of staying active throughout life. According to the National Sporting Goods Association, popular senior programming trends include hiking, birding, and swimming. Economic Impact of Festivals and Events In the context of urban development, from the early 1980’s there has been a process that can be characterized as ‘festivalization’, which has been linked to the economic restructuring of towns and cities, and the drive to develop communities as large-scale platforms for the creation and consumption of ‘cultural experience’. The success rate for festivals should not be evaluated simplistically solely on the basis of profit (sales), prestige (media profile), size (numbers of events). Research by the European Festival Research Project (EFRP)22 indicates there is evidence of local and city government supporting and even instigating and managing particular festivals themselves to achieve local or regional economic objectives, often defined very narrowly (sales, jobs, tourists). There are also a growing number of smaller more local community-based festivals and events in communities, most often supported by local councils that have been spawned partly as a reaction to larger festivals that have become prime economic-drivers. These community-based festivals often will re-claim 9 cultural ground based on their social, educational and participative value. For more information on the values of festivals and events, see the CRC Sustainable Tourism research guide 23 on this topic. In 2014, festivals grew in popularity as economic drivers and urban brand builders. Chad Kaydo describes the phenomenon in the January 2014 issues of Governing Magazine: “Municipal officials and entrepreneur see the power of cultural festivals, innovation-focused business conferences and the like as a way to spur short-term tourism while shaping an image of the hose city as a cool, dynamic location where companies and citizens in modern, creative industries can thrive.”24 Examples of successful festivals include: • South by Southwest (SXSW) – this annual music, film, and digital conference and festival in Austin, Texas, is a leading example. Launched in 1987, the festival’s economic impact has grown steadily over recent years. In 2007, it netted $95 million for Austin’s economy. In 2013, the event topped $218 million. • Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival in California – this two-week cultural event draws big-name bands, music fans, and marketers, attracting 80,000 people per day. • First City Festival in Monterey, California – Private producer, Goldenvoice, launched this smaller music event in August 2013 with marketing support from the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau, drawing on the city’s history as host of the Monterey Jazz Festival. Adding carnival rides and local art, furniture and clothing vendors to the live music performances, the event drew 11,000 attendees each of its two days. Healthy Lifestyle Trends and Active Living Active Transportation – Bicycling and Walking Bicycle friendly cities have been emerging over the last ten years. Cycling has become a popular mode of transportation as people consider the rising cost of fuel, desire for better health, and concern for the environment. Some people also use cycling as a mode of transportation just for the fun of it. The Alliance for Biking and Walking published Bicycling and Walking in the United States 2014 Benchmark Report,25, updating its Benchmarking report from 2012. The report shows that increasing bicycling and walking are goals clearly in the public interest. Where bicycling and walking levels are higher, obesity, high blood pressure, and diabetes levels are lower. Design of a community’s infrastructure is directly linked to physical activity – where environments are built with bicyclists and pedestrians in mind, more people bike and walk. Higher levels of bicycling and walking also coincide with increased bicycle and pedestrian safety and higher levels of physical activity. Increasing bicycling and walking make a big impact on improving public health and life expectancy. The following trends as well as health and economic indicators are pulled from the 2012 and 2014 Benchmarking Reports: Public health trends related to bicycling and walking include: • Quantified health benefits of active transportation can outweigh any risks associated with the activities by as much as 77 to 1, and add more years to our lives than are lost from inhaled air pollution and traffic injuries. • Between 1966 and 2009, the number of children who bicycled or walked to school fell 75 percent, while the percentage of obese children rose 276 percent. 10 • Bicycling to work significantly reduces absenteeism due to illness. Regular bicyclists took 7.4 sick days per year, while non-bicyclists took 8.7 sick days per year. The economic benefits of bicycling and walking include: • Bicycling and walking projects create 8-12 jobs per $1 million spent, compared to just 7 jobs created per $1 million spent on highway projects. • Cost benefit analyses show that up to $11.80 in benefits can be gained for every $1 invested in bicycling and walking. National bicycling trends: • There has been a gradual trend of increasing bicycling and walking to work since 2005. • Infrastructure to support biking communities is becoming more commonly funded in communities. • Bike share systems, making bicycles available to the public for low-cost, short-term use, have been sweeping the nation since 2010. Twenty of the most populous U.S. cities have a functional bike share system. In November 2013, the Institute for Transportation & Development Policy published a Standard for Transportation Oriented Design, with accessible performance objectives and metrics, to help municipalities, developers and local residents design land use and built environment “to support, facilitate and prioritize not only the use of public transport, but the most basic modes of transport, walking and cycling.” The TOD Standard, along with its performance objectives and scoring metrics, can be found at www.itdp.org/documents/TOD_v2_FINAL.pdf.26 National Healthy Lifestyle Trends The population of the United States is becoming more diverse. As demographics are experiencing an age and ethnic shift, so too are landscapes, daily lifestyles and habits changing. The number of adults over the age of 65 has increased, lifestyle changes have encouraged less physical activity; collectively these trends have created profound implications for the way local governments conduct business. Below are examples of trends and government responses. • According to the article “Outdoor Exercise ‘Healthier than Gym Workouts,’” published in February 201127, researchers found that going for a run outdoors is better than exercising in the gym because it has a positive impact on mental, as well as physical health. Levels of tension, confusion, anger, and depression were found to be lowered. This aligns with the trend of adult fitness playgrounds that are popping up all over the world. • While Americans have been notoriously unhealthy, a recent survey found that 58 percent of Americans adults are paying more attention to their personal health than in the past; 57 percent seek to eat a healthier diet, 54 percent seek to achieve a healthy weight; and, 45 percent want to reduce stress in their lives.28 • The link between health and the built environment continues to grow as a trend for local governments. They are increasingly incorporating active living and physical activity into daily routines. More and more, local governments are accepting the role of providing preventative health care through park and recreation services. The following facts are from an International City/County Management local government survey 29: • 89% of respondents believed P&R departments should take the lead in developing communities conducive to active living. 11 • 84% had already implemented recreation programs that encourage active living in their community. • The highest priority selected for the greatest impact on community health and physical inactivity was a cohesive system of parks and trails and accessible neighborhood parks. Health and Obesity According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), obesity continues to be a serious issue in America, growing at an epidemic rate—almost tripling since 1990. Overall, more than one-third (35.7%) of adults and 17% of children in the United States are obese.30. These statistics illustrates the importance of intercepting the epidemic in youth. As obesity in the United States continues to be a topic of interest for legislators and our government, there continues to be research suggesting that activity levels are stagnant among all age groups. The following are statistics that support this concern.  Only 25 percent of adults and 27 percent of youth (grades 9-12) engage in recommended levels of physical activity.  59 percent of American adults are sedentary.  Children nationally spend 4.5 - 8 hours daily (30-56 hours per week) in front of a screen (television and/or computer). Shade Structures Communities around the country are considering adding shade structures as well as shade trees to their parks, playgrounds and pools, as “a weapon against cancer and against childhood obesity”31; both to reduce future cancer risk and promote exercise among children. A 2005 study found that melanoma rates in people under 20 rose three percent a year between 1973 and 2001, possibly due to a thinning of the ozone layer in the atmosphere. It is recommended that children seek shade between 10am and 4pm, but with so little shade available, kids have nowhere to go. Additionally, without adequate shade, many play areas are simply too hot to be inviting to children. On sunny days, the playground equipment is hot enough to scald the hands of would-be users. Trees would help, as tree leaves absorb about 95 percent of ultraviolet radiation, but they take a decade or more to grow large enough to make a difference. So, many communities are building shade structures instead. The non-profit Shade Foundation of American is a good resource for information about shade and shade structures, www.shadefoundation.org. Trails and Health That a connected system of trails increases the level of physical activity in a community has been scientifically demonstrated through the Trails for Health initiative of the (CDC)32. Trails can provide a wide variety of opportunities for being physically active, such as walking/running/hiking, rollerblading, wheelchair recreation, bicycling, cross-country skiing and snowshoeing, fishing, hunting, and horseback riding. Recognizing that active use of trails for positive health outcomes is an excellent way to encourage people to adopt healthy lifestyle changes, American Trails has launched a “Health and Trails” resource section in its website: www/americantrails.org/resources/benefits/. 12 The health benefits are equally as high for trails in urban neighborhoods as for those in state or national parks. A trail in the neighborhood, creating a ‘linear park’, makes it easier for people to incorporate exercise into their daily routines, whether for recreation or non-motorized transportation. Urban trails need to connect people to places they want to go, such as schools, transit centers, businesses, and neighborhoods.33 Natural Environments and Open Space Conservation The top ten recommendations of the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) Conservation Task Force were published in the November 2011 issue of Parks and Recreation Magazine 34. These recommendations are a compilation of best practices used by trend-setting agencies. 1) Take a leadership role in the community to promote conservation. Park and recreation agencies have a unique opportunity to bring governmental agencies, non-profit organizations, community leaders, and the public together for the cause of working together on community wide conservation objectives - clean water, wildlife habitat preservation, reducing energy use and improving environmental quality. Park and recreation agencies must lead the way in promoting conservation to diverse and underserved audiences. 2) Lead by example in employing best management conservation practices in parks. Park and recreation agencies should become the catalyst in the community for conservation by showing how best practices can be adopted-not mowing what you don´t need to mow; stopping wasteful energy consumption; and reducing pesticide use for example. Show the public how conservation practices can benefit everyone. 3) Engage volunteers in conservation and stewardship. Create a sense of belonging and stewardship for parks by creating a personal sense of ownership and value. Enable people to identify with their parks and natural resources, and to care about their future. Sustain stewardship by creating meaningful public participation in implementation of conservation principles and practices. 4) Establish a strategic land acquisition strategy based on knowledge and awareness of significant natural and cultural resources (watershed protection, unique ecological characteristics, and sensitive natural areas deserving protection). As the largest owners of public land within most communities, park and recreation agencies should lead the way in developing a strategic vision for preserving open space and conserving important landscapes and natural features. 5) Engage youth in conservation. Get kids and teens outdoors and enjoying their parks. The experience of nature is inherently rewarding for youth. Set as a goal to connect kids in the community to nature and the outdoors. Children and youth will be fascinated by nature and will develop a lifelong affinity as well as a conservation ethic if they have early opportunities to enjoy nature and recreate outdoors in a safe, rewarding way. 13 6) Conserve energy in all ways. Park and recreation agencies must lead by example, showing the public how and why they should adopt practices that they can see demonstrated in parks and recreation facilities. Park and recreation agencies should adopt energy conservation measures that make sense and save public taxpayer funds. 7) Protect natural resources in parks and in the community. A core mission of public parks is to protect land and water resources and to be stewards of natural resources. This means committing personnel and resources to protect natural and cultural resources and creating sustainable long-term methods of funding this conservation mission. Parks and recreation agencies are entrusted with some of the most important public assets of a community and the conservation and long-term protection of this public trust is and should be a core component of every parks and recreation agency´s mission. 8) Create sustainable landscapes that demonstrate principles of conservation. Utilize sustainable landscape practices to save taxpayer funds, to measurably improve conservation benefits, and to educate the public about conservation. For example, agencies can reduce turf grass and mowing frequency; replace turf with native plants; manage floodplains for multiple uses including conservation and public recreation; enhance wetlands for water filtration and groundwater recharge; plant model landscapes of drought tolerant native plants adapted to climate and culture; and promote parks as food sources through edible landscapes and community gardens. 9) Forge partnerships that foster the mission of conservation. The greatest and most beneficial conservation successes most often occur as a result of collaboration. Park and recreation agencies should partner with non-profit and community service organizations, universities and colleges, school systems, other governmental agencies, and non-traditional partners for conservation outcomes. Promote health, education, and other goals while working toward a common mission of conservation. 10) Utilize technology to promote conservation. Park and recreation agencies need to embrace technology to promote conservation. This is not only in applications such as GIS, but in utilizing social media to engage the public, especially youth. Technology is not to be feared as something that detracts from the conservation mission of parks agencies, but rather it is to be accepted as a means of sharing knowledge and connecting people to conservation and stewardship. Economic & Health Benefits of Parks There are numerous economic and health benefits of parks, including the following: • Trails, parks, and playgrounds are among the five most important community amenities considered when selecting a home. • Research from the University of Illinois shows that trees, parks, and green spaces have a profound impact on people’s health and mental outlook.35 • US Forest Service research indicates that when the economic benefits produced by trees are assessed, the total value can be two to six times the cost for tree planting and care.36 • Fifty percent of Americans regard outdoor activities as their main source of exercise.37 14 The Trust for Public Land has published a report titled: “The Benefits of Parks: Why America Needs More City Parks and Open Space.” The report makes the following observations about the health, economic, environmental, and social benefits of parks and open space 38: • Physical activity makes people healthier. • Physical activity increases with access to parks. • Contact with the natural world improves physical and physiological health. • Residential and commercial property values increase. • Value is added to community and economic development sustainability. • Benefits of tourism are enhanced. • Trees are effective in improving air quality and act as natural air conditioners. • Trees assist with storm water control and erosion. • Crime and juvenile delinquency are reduced. • Recreational opportunities for all ages are provided. • Stable neighborhoods and strong communities are created. Researchers have long touted the benefits of outdoor exercise. According to a study published in the Journal of Environmental Science and Technology by the University of Essex in the United Kingdom, “as little as five minutes of green exercise improves both mood and self-esteem.”39 A new trend started in China as they prepared to host the 2008 Summer Olympics. Their aim was to promote a society that promotes physical fitness and reaps the benefits of outdoor exercise by working out on outdoor fitness equipment. The United States is now catching up on this trend, as park and recreation departments have begun installing “outdoor gyms.” Equipment that can be found in these outdoor gyms is comparable to what would be found in an indoor workout facility, such as leg and chest presses, elliptical trainers, pull down trainers, etc. With no additional equipment such as weights and resistance bands, the equipment is fairly easy to install. Outdoor fitness equipment provides a new opportunity for parks and recreation departments to increase the health of their communities, while offering them the opportunity to exercise outdoors. Such equipment can increase the usage of parks, trails, and other outdoor amenities while helping to fight the obesity epidemic and increase the community’s interaction with nature. Nature Programming Noted as early as 2003 in Recreation Management Magazine, park agencies have been seeing an increase in interest in environmental-oriented “back to nature” programs. In 2007, the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) sent out a survey to member agencies in order to learn more about the programs and facilities that public park and recreation agencies provide to connect children and their families with nature.40 A summary of the results follow: • Sixty-eight percent of public parks and recreation agencies offer nature-based programming and 61% have nature-based facilities. “There’s a direct link between a lack of exposure to nature and higher rates of attention-deficit disorder, obesity, and depression. In essence, parks and recreation agencies can and are becoming the ‘preferred provider’ for offering this preventative healthcare.” – Fran P. Mainella, former director of the National Park Service and Instructor at Clemson University. 15 • The most common programs include nature hikes, nature-oriented arts and crafts, fishing-related events, and nature-based education in cooperation with local schools. • When asked to describe the elements that directly contribute to their most successful programs, agencies listed staff training as most important followed by program content and number of staff/staff training. • When asked what resources would be needed most to expand programming, additional staff was most important followed by funding. • Of the agencies that do not currently offer nature-based programming, 90 percent indicated that they want to in the future. Additional staff and funding were again the most important resources these agencies would need going forward. • The most common facilities include: nature parks/preserves, self-guided nature trails, outdoor classrooms, and nature centers. • When asked to describe the elements that directly contribute to their most successful facilities, agencies listed funding as most important followed by presence of wildlife and community support. Figures from the Association for Interpretative Naturalists, a national group of nature professionals, demonstrate that nature-based programs are on the rise. According to Tim Merriman, the association's executive director, the group was founded in 1954 with 40 members. It now boasts 4,800 members, with research indicating that about 20,000 paid interpreters are working nationally, along with an army of more than 500,000 unpaid volunteers staffing nature programs at parks, zoos and museums. The growth of these programs is thought to come from replacing grandparents as the teacher about the “great outdoors”. It is also speculated that a return to natural roots and renewed interest in life’s basic elements was spurred as a response to September 11, 2000. 41 In his book Last Child in the Woods: Saving Children from Nature Deficit Disorder 42, Richard Louv introduced the concept of the restorative qualities of being out in nature, for both children and adults. This concept, and research in support of it, has led to a growing movement promoting connections with nature in daily life. One manifestation of this is the development of Nature Explore Classrooms in parks. Nature Explore43 is a collaborative program of the Arbor Day Foundation and the non-profit organization, Dimensions Educational Research Foundation, with a mission of helping children and families develop a profound engagement with the natural world, where nature is an integral, joyful part of children’s daily learning. Nature Explore works to support efforts to connect children with nature. Sports and Recreation Trends General Sports and Recreation Trends The National Sporting Goods Association (NSGA) survey on sports participation in 201244 found the top five athletic activities ranked by total participation included: exercise walking, exercising with equipment, swimming, camping, and aerobic exercising. Additionally, the following active, organized, or skill development activities remain popular: hiking, running/jogging, bicycle riding, basketball, golf, and soccer. Table 3 outlines the top twenty sports ranked by total participation in 2012. 16 Table 3: Top Twenty Sports Ranked by Total Participation (in millions) in 2012 Sport Total 1. Exercise Walking 102.1 2. Exercising with Equipment 57.7 3. Swimming 48.6 4. Camping (vacation/overnight) 45.2 5. Aerobic Exercising 44.8 6. Hiking 42.2 7. Running/Jogging 40.0 8. Bicycle Riding 39.3 9. Bowling 35.5 10. Workout at Club 35.2 11. Weight Lifting 31.1 12. Fishing (Freshwater) 30.8 13. Wrestling 28.4 14. Basketball 25.6 15. Yoga 22.9 16. Billiards/Pool 21.8 17. Target Shooting 21.7 18. Golf 21.1 19. Hunting with Firearms 19.4 20. Boating, Motor/Power 17.0 Source: NSGA 2012 The Sports & Fitness Industry Association (SFIA) produces a yearly report on sports, fitness and leisure activities in the US. The following findings were highlighted in the 2013 Report 45: • Overall participation in sports, fitness and related physical activities remained relatively steady from 2011 to 2012. • Fitness Sports had the largest increase in participation (2% increases to 61.1%). • Racquet Sports participation also increased (1% increase to 12.8 %) but still remains the 2008 peak rate of 14 %. • Both team (21.6%) and water sports 12.5%) participation increased slightly while individual (36%) and winter sports (6.6%) participation decreased slightly. • Outdoor Sports participation remained stable at around 49%. • Spending on team sports at school and lessons/instruction/sports camp was expected to increase in 2013 as it has in 2011 and 2012. • 28% of all Americans are inactive while 33% are active to a healthy level (engaged in high calorie level sport/fitness activities in a frequent basis). Idaho ranked among the states with the highest among five activity levels measured (from 38% to 43.6%). The Ten-year History of Sports Participation Report 46 published by NSGA shows national trends in team sports and individual sports. Overall participation trends indicate a general increase in 2011 for most team sports. However, softball and volleyball show a decrease in participation 17 through 2011. Over the decade individual sports show a dramatic increase in aerobic exercising, exercise walking, exercising with equipment, hiking, kayaking, running/jogging, target shooting and target shooting with an airgun, tennis, weightlifting and working out at a club. Table 4 illustrates a ten year change in participation for selected activities including both team sports and individual sports. Table 4: Ten-Year History of Sports Participation (in millions) 2001-2011 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 Aerobic Exercising 24.3 28.0 33.7 34.8 33.2 42.0 Archery (Target) 4.7 3.9 6.8 6.6 7.1 6.3 Backpacking/Wilderness Camping 14.5 13.7 13.3 13.0 12.3 11.6 Baseball 14.9 14.6 14.6 14.0 11.5 12.3 Basketball 28.1 27.9 29.9 24.1 24.4 26.1 Bicycle Riding 39.0 36.3 43.1 37.4 38.1 39.1 Billiards/Pool 32.7 30.5 37.3 29.5 28.2 20.0 Boating, Motor/Power 22.6 24.2 27.5 31.9 24.0 16.7 Bowling 40.3 39.4 45.4 43.5 45.0 34.9 Camping 45.5 51.4 46.0 47.5 50.9 42.8 Dart Throwing 16.9 n/a n/a 12.1 12.2 9.3 Exercise Walking 71.2 79.5 86.0 89.8 93.4 97.1 Exercising with Equipment 43.0 48.6 54.2 52.9 57.2 55.5 Fishing (Freshwater) 39.1 33.2 37.5 30.8 29.0 28.0 Fishing (Saltwater) 11.3 10.6 10.0 10.4 8.2 9.7 Football (tackle) 8.6 8.7 9.9 9.2 8.9 9.0 Golf 26.6 25.7 24.7 22.7 22.3 20.9 Hiking 26.1 25.0 29.8 28.6 34.0 39.1 Hockey (ice) .2 1.8 2.4 2.1 3.1 3.0 Hunting w/Bow & Arrow 4.7 5.0 6.6 5.7 6.2 5.1 Hunting with Firearms 19.2 17.7 19.6 19.5 18.8 16.4 In-Line Roller Skating 19.2 16.0 13.1 10.7 7.9 6.1 Kayaking 3.5 4.7 7.6 5.9 4.9 7.1 Mountain Biking (off road) 6.3 8.2 9.2 9.3 8.4 6.0 Muzzleloading 3.0 3.1 4.1 3.6 3.8 3.1 Paintball Games 5.6 7.4 8.0 7.4 6.3 5.3 Running/Jogging 24.5 22.9 29.2 30.4 32.2 38.7 Skateboarding 9.6 9.0 12.0 10.1 8.4 6.6 Skiing (Alpine) 7.7 6.8 6.9 6.4 7.0 6.9 Skiing (Cross Country) 2.3 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.7 2.3 Snowboarding 5.3 6.3 6.0 5.1 6.2 5.1 Soccer 13.9 11.1 14.1 13.8 13.6 13.9 Softball 13.2 11.8 14.1 12.4 11.8 10.4 Swimming 54.8 47.0 58.0 52.3 50.2 46.0 Target Shooting 15.9 17.0 21.9 20.5 19.8 19.6 Target Shooting (Airgun) 2.9 3.8 6.7 6.6 5.2 5.3 Tennis 10.9 9.6 11.1 12.3 10.8 13.1 Volleyball 12.0 10.4 13.2 12.0 10.7 10.1 Water Skiing 5.5 5.5 6.7 5.3 5.2 4.3 Weight Lifting 21.2 25.9 35.5 33.2 34.5 29.1 Workout at Club 26.5 29.5 34.7 36.8 38.3 34.5 Wrestling 3.5 n/a n/a 2.1 3.0 3.2 Note: Participated more than once (in millions), seven (7) years of age and older. 18 Source: NSGA 2012 Youth Sports The 2013 SFIA sports participation report indicates that in 2012 youth (ages 6-12) participation was highest for outdoor (63.1%), team (53.1%) and individual sport (49.8%). Children in this age group have increased interest in camping, while young adults ages 18 – 24 are becoming more interested in running/jogging. The NSGA Youth Sports Participation Report from 2001 – 2011 indicates that specific offerings for kid’s fitness are slowly increasing in health and fitness facilities. Facilities are offering more youth-specific exercise equipment. Individualized youth sports training opportunities are becoming more popular as well. In 2011, in-line roller skating experienced the largest percentage decrease in participation. For youth ages seven to 17 years, exercise walking, exercising with equipment, and swimming, followed by overnight/vacation camping had the highest number of participants in 2011 47. In 2009, an article in the Wall Street Journal observed that, in recent years lacrosse has become one of the country’s fastest growing team sports. Participation in high school lacrosse has almost doubled this decade. An estimated 1.2 million Americans over age seven played lacrosse in 2009.48 A 2011 report, “U.S. Trends in Team Sports”, finds that Lacrosse and other niche team sports and volleyball are continuing to experience strong growth for youth and adults.49 Adult Recreation: Pickleball No adult recreational sport is taking off faster than pickleball 50. Pickleball is a racquet sport played on a badminton court with a lowered net, perforated plastic ball and wood paddles. While it originated in the Pacific Northwest in the 1960’s, it has grown exponentially since 2000. The USA Pickle ball Association (USAPA) estimates that there were about 500 pickleball players in 2000, with that number growing to 125,000 in 2013. It’s especially popular with the 50 plus crowd because it is low impact but gets the heart rate pumping.51 Pickle ball is an attractive programming option for recreation managers because it is adaptable to a variety of existing facilities – four pickleball courts fit in one tennis court. Outdoor Recreation The Outdoor Foundation releases a “Participation in Outdoor Recreation” report, annually. According to the 2014 report 52, while the actual number of outdoor recreation outings increased since 2012, the participation rate fell slightly, due to population growth. The foundation reports that the top outdoor activities in 2013 were running, fishing, bicycling, camping, and hiking. Birdwatching is also among the favorite outdoor activities by frequency of participation. The Outdoor Foundation’s research brought the following key findings. Participation in Outdoor Recreation • Return to Nature: Nearly 50% of Americans ages six and older participated in outdoor recreation in 2013. That equates to a total of 143 million. • Top Five Biggest Participation Percentage Increase in Outdoor Activities in the Past three years (2014 Topline Report): Adventure Racing, Triathlon (Off Road), Stand up paddling, Kayak fishing, Recreational Kayaking. 19 • Recreation for Exercise: More than 70% of outdoor participants were motivated to recreate outdoors as a way of getting exercise. Youth Participation in Outdoor Recreation • Good News about outdoor participation rates of female youth: Participation rates among girls and young women increased by two percentage points – bringing young women’s participation to the highest since 2006. • The Influence of Family: Most youth are introduced to outdoor activities by parents, friends, family, and relatives. • Physical education in schools: The importance cannot be understated. Among adults ages 18 and older who are current outdoor participants, 74% say they had PE in school between the ages of 6 and 12. Outdoor recreation trends are also a recurring topic of study by the United States Forest Service through the Internet Research Information Series (IRIS). An IRIS report dated January 2012 53 provides the following recent nature-based outdoor recreation trends: Participation in walking for pleasure and family gatherings outdoors were the two most popular activities for the U.S. population as a whole. These outdoor activities were followed closely in popularity by viewing/ photographing wildlife, boating, fishing, snow/ice activities, and swimming. There has been a growing momentum in participation in sightseeing, birding and wildlife watching in recent years. Trail Recreation and Cycling Trends For trail-related recreation activities such as hiking, bicycling, and running, the 2014 Outdoor Recreation Topline Report indicates a positive three-year trend for running/jogging, hiking, road biking, and BMX biking. Additionally, participation in trail running and mountain biking is up significantly over the past two to three years. Table 5: Trail Recreation Participation by Activity (in thousands) (6 years of age or older) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 3 Year Change BMX Bicycling 1,904 1,811 2,369 1,547 2,175 2,168 1.9% Bicycling (Mountain/Non-Paved Surface) 7,592 7,142 7,161 6,816 7,714 8,542 6.4% Bicycling (Road/Paved Surface) 38,114 40,140 39,320 40,349 39,232 40,888 1.4% Hiking (Day) 32,511 32,572 32,496 34,491 34,545 34,378 1.9% Running/Jogging 41,130 43,892 49,408 50,713 52,187 54,188 3.1% Trail Running 4,857 4,833 5,136 5,610 6,003 6,792 9.8% Source: Outdoor Foundation 2014. Other Cycling Trends • Bicycle touring are becoming a fast-growing trend around the world, including the US and Canada. “Travelers are seeking out bike tours to stay active, minimize environmental impact, and experience diverse landscapes and cityscapes at a closer level.”54 20 • Urban bike tours, popular in cycle-friendly cities in Europe, are taking hold in the United States as well. Bikes and Hikes LA, an eco-friendly bike and hike sightseeing company founded last September, offers visitors the opportunity to “see the city’s great outdoors while getting a good workout.” In New York, a hotel and a bike store are partnering to offer guests cruisers to explore the city during the summer of 2014.55 • One of the newest trends in adventure cycling is “fat bike”, multiple speed bikes that are made to ride when other bikes can’t be ridden, with tires that are up to 5 inches wide run at low pressure for extra traction. Most fat bikes are used to ride on snow but they are also very effective for riding on any loose surface like sand or mud. They also work well on most rough terrain or just riding through the woods. This bike offers unique opportunities to experience nature in ways that wouldn’t be possible otherwise.56 Therapeutic Recreation Nationally, therapeutic recreation as a service is experiencing many struggles and challenges. The changing face of health care is having a dramatic effect on therapeutic recreation (TR) services in many rehabilitation settings and specifically in physical rehabilitation settings, thus affecting community recreation programs. A secondary issue caused by the decreased stay is the need for a clinical facility to promote community reintegration. In the past, clinical facilities provided programs such as wheelchair basketball, but due to the reduction of expenditures, facilities no longer provide such services and expect communities to address these needs. The fundamental goal of TR services is to enable participants to return successfully to their communities. This not only means they need to have the functional skill but also that they have physical and social environments in the community that are receptive to the individual. Another trend is the renewed focus on serving people with psychiatric disabilities. In 2004, The National Council on Disability (NCD) issued a comprehensive report, Livable Communities for Adults with Disabilities 57. This report identified six elements for improving the quality of life for all citizens, including children, youth and adults- with disabilities. The six elements are: 1. Provides affordable, appropriate, accessible housing 2. Ensures accessible, affordable, reliable, safe transportation 3. Adjusts the physical environment for inclusiveness and accessibility 4. Provides work, volunteer, and education opportunities 5. Ensures access to key health and support services 6. Encourages participation in civic, cultural, social, and recreational activities The right to enjoy services and programs offered to all members by both public and private entities is the essence of the elements. Unlike persons with physical disabilities, people with psychiatric disabilities face attitudinal barriers of those around them. Attitudinal barriers are exemplified by policies, programs, and beliefs about psychiatric disabilities. Fortunately, the mental health system is moving toward a model based on recovery. This model believes that everyone with a mental health diagnosis is able and capable of living independently within the community with supports. 21 Role and Response of Local Government Collectively, these trends have created profound implications for the way local governments conduct business. Some local governments are now accepting the role of providing preventative health care through parks and recreation services. The following concepts are from the International County/County Management Association 58. • Parks & Recreation departments should take the lead in developing communities conducive to active living. • There is growing support for recreation programs that encourage active living within their community. • One of the highest priorities is a cohesive system of parks and trails and accessible neighborhood parks. In summary, the United States of America, its states, and its communities share the enormous task of reducing the health and economic burden of obesity. While numerous programs, policies, and products have been designed to address the problem, there is no magic bullet to make it go away. The role of public parks and recreation as a health promotion and prevention agency has come of age. What matters is refocusing its efforts to insure the health, well-being, and economic prosperity of communities and citizens. Administration Trends for Recreation and Parks Municipal parks and recreation structures and delivery systems have changed, and more alternative methods of delivering services are emerging. Certain services are being contracted out and cooperative agreements with non-profit groups and other public institutions are being developed. Newer partners include the health system, social services, justice system, education, the corporate sector, and community service agencies. These partnerships reflect both a broader interpretation of the mandate of parks and recreation agencies and the increased willingness of other sectors to work together to address community issues. The relationship with health agencies is vital in promoting wellness. 22 The traditional relationship with education and the sharing of facilities through joint-use agreements is evolving into cooperative planning and programming aimed at addressing youth inactivity levels and community needs. Listed below are additional administrative national trends: • Level of subsidy for programs is lessening and more “enterprise” activities are being developed, thereby allowing subsidy to be used where deemed appropriate. • Information technology allows for better tracking and reporting. • Pricing is often determined by peak, off- peak, and off-season rates. • More agencies are partnering with private, public, and non-profit groups. Agency Accreditation Parks and Recreation agencies are affirming their competencies and value through accreditation. This is achieved by an agency’s commitment to 150 standards. There are currently 116 agencies around the nation that have received the Commission for Accreditation of Parks and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA) accreditation. Additional benefits of CAPRA accreditation include: • Boosts staff morale • Encourages collaboration • Improves program outcomes • Identifies agency and cost efficiencies • Builds high level of trust with the public • Demonstrates promise of quality • Identifies best management practices Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) - Compliance On September 14, 2010 the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued an amended regulation implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA 2010 Standards)59. On March 15, 2011 the amended Act became effective and, for the first time in history, includes recreation environment Accreditation is a distinguished mark of excellence that affords external recognition of an organization's commitment to quality and improvement. Accreditation has two fundamental purposes; to ensure quality and to ensure improvement. The National Recreation and Parks Association administratively sponsors two distinct accreditation programs. The Council on Accreditation of Parks, Recreation, Tourism and Related Professions (COAPRT) approves Academic institutions and Commission for Accreditation of Parks and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA) approves agencies. It is the only national accreditation of parks and recreation agencies, and is a valuable measure of an agency’s overall quality of 23 design requirements. Covered entities were to be compliant with design and construction requirements and the development of three-year transition plan by March 15, 2012. Implementation of the three-year transition plan must be complete by March 15, 2015. Funding According to Recreation Management Magazine’s “2014 State of the Industry Report”, survey respondents from parks and recreation departments/districts reporting about their revenues from 2011 through 2013 reveals the beginning of a recovery from the impact of the Recession of 2008. From 2011 to 2012, 82.6 percent of respondents reported that their revenues had either stabilized or had increased. This number grew to 84.8 percent of respondents when reporting on the 2012 to 2013 time frame and, by 2015, 95 percent of parks and recreation department respondents are expecting revenues to either increase (49.7 percent) or remain stable (45.4 percent). Marketing by Parks and Recreation Providers Niche marketing trends have experienced change more frequently than ever before as technology affects the way the public receives information. Web 2.0 tools and now Web 3.0 tools are a trend for agencies to use as a means of marketing programs and services. Popular social marketing electronic tools include: • Facebook • Whirl • Twitter • You Tube • Tagged • LinkedIn Mobile marketing is a trend of the future. Young adults engage in mobile data applications at much higher rates than adults in age brackets 30 and older. Usage rates of mobile applications demonstrate chronologically across four major age cohorts, that millennials tend to get information more frequently using mobile devices such as smart phones. For example, 95 percent of 18-to-29-year-old cell phone owners send and receive text messages, compared to 82 percent of 30-to-49-year-olds, 57 percent of 50-to-64-year-olds, and 19 percent of 65 and older. It is also a fact that minority Americans lead the way when it comes to mobile internet access. Nearly two-thirds of African-Americans (64%) and Latinos (63%) are wireless internet users, and minority Americans are significantly more likely to own a cell phone than are their white counterparts (87 percent of Blacks and Hispanics own a cell phone, compared with 80 percent of whites).60 By 2015, mobile internet penetration is forecast to grow to 71.1% for Hispanics compared to 58.8% for whites.61 1 Howe, Neil, and William Strauss, (2000). Millennials Rising, the Next Great Generation. Vintage: New York, New York. 2 California State Parks, Recreation Opportunities. (2010) “Here come the ‘Millennials’: What You Need to Know to Connect with this New Generation”, http://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/795/files/millennials%20final, accessed January 12, 2015, pages 4-6. 3 Linda Cochran, Anne Roshschadl, and Jodi Rudick, Leisure Programming For Baby Boomers, Human Kinetics, 2009. 24 4 Emilyn Sheffield, “Five Trends Shaping Tomorrow Today,” Parks and Recreation, July 2012 p. 16-17. 52012 Participation Report, Physical Activity Council, 2012. 6 Jeffry Ziegler, “Recreating Retirement: How Will Baby Boomers Reshape Leisure in Their 60s?” Parks and Recreation, October 2002. 7 Adam Serwer, “The End of White America,” Mother Jones, http://www.motherjones.com/kevin- drum/2012/05/end-white-america, May 17, 2012. 8 Baldwin Ellis, “The Effects of Culture & Diversity on America”, http://www.ehow.com/facts_5512569_effects-culture-diversity-america.html, accessed on Sept. 20, 2012. 9 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 2014”, Outdoor Foundation, 2014. 10 P.L. Winter, W.C. Jeong, G.C. Godbey, “Outdoor recreation among Asian Americans: A case study of San Francisco Bay Area residents”, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 2004. 11 Harry Zinne and Alan Graefe, “Emerging Adults and the Future of Wild nature”, International Journal of Wildness. December 2007. 12 Emilyn Sheffield, “Five Trends Shaping Tomorrow Today,” Parks and Recreation, July 2012 p. 16-17. 13 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 2013”, Outdoor Foundation, 2013. 14 “SJG Multicultural Facts & Trends”, San Jose Group, http://blog.thesanjosegroup.com/?p=275, posted October 25, 2010. 15 Emily Tipping, “2014 State of the Industry Report, State of the Managed Recreation Industry”, Recreation Management, June 2014. 16 National Sporting Goods Association, “2012 Participation – Ranked by Total Participation”, 2013. 17 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Topline Report 2014”, Outdoor Foundation, 2014. 18 Emily Tipping, “2014 State of the Industry Report, Trends in Parks and Recreation”, Recreation Management, June 2014. 19 “Walter R. Thompson, “Worldwide Survey of Fitness Trends for 2012”, Health & Fitness Journal, American College of Sports Medicine, 2011. 20 Emily Tipping, “2014 State of the Industry Report, Trends in Parks and Recreation”, Recreation Management, June 2013. 21 “Survey Predicts Top 20 Fitness Trends for 2015”, American College of Sports Medicine, http://www.acsm.org/about-acsm/media-room/news-releases/2014/10/24/survey-predicts-top-20- fitness-trends-for-2015, Accessed January 2015. 22 EFRP is an international consortium seeking to understand the current explosion of festivals and its implications and perspective, http://www.efa-aef.eu/en/activities/efrp/, accessed October 2012. 23 Ben Janeczko. Trevor Mules and Brent Ritchie, “Estimating the Economic Impacts of Festivals and Events: A Research Guide”, Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism, 2002, http://www.sustainabletourismonline.com/1005/events/estimating-the-economic-impacts-of-festivals- and-events-a-research-guide, accessed October 2012. 24 Chad Kaydo, “Cities Create Music, Cultural Festivals to Make Money,” Governing, January 2014, http://www.governing.com/topics/finance/gov-cities-create-mucis-festivals.html. 25 2014 Benchmarking Report, Alliance for Biking and Walking, http://www.bikewalkalliance.org/download-the-2014-benchmarking-report, Accessed on January 23, 2015. 26“TOD Standard, Version 2.0”, Institute for Transportation & Development Policy, November 2013, http://www.itdp.org/documents/TOD_v2_FINAL.pdf. 27 “Outdoor Exercise Healthier than Gym Workouts”, Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/outdoors/outdoor-activities/8306979/Outdoor-exercise-healther- than-gym-workouts.html, accessed March 2011. 28 Sy Mukherjee, “Are Americans inching their way to Healthier Lifestyles?” Think Progress, http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/08/02/2403921/americans-maybe-getting-heathier/, Aug 2, 2013. 29 “Active Living approached by Local Government: Survey”, International City/County Management Association, http://bookstore.icma.org/freedocs/Active%20Living%20and%20Social%20Equity.pdf, 2004. 25 30 “Obesity and Overweight - Facts”, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/facts.html, accessed on October 3, 2012. 31 Liz Szabo, “Shade: A weapon against skin cancer, childhood obesity”, USA Today, June 30, 2011, usatoday.30.usatoday.com/news/health/wellness/story/2011/06/Shade-serves-as-a –weapon-against- skin-cancer-childhood-obesity/48965070/1, accessed 5/23/3013. 32 “Guide to Community Preventive Services” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), http://www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html 33 “Health Community: What you should know about trail building,” National Trails Training Partnership: Health and Fitness, http://www.americantrails.org/resources/health/healthcombuild.html, accessed on May 24, 2013. 34 “Conservation Leaders in our Community,” National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), November 2011 Magazine, pages 85-101, http://digital.parksandrecreation.org/launch.aspx? referral=other&pnum=&refresh=Fj302M1i0bE7&EID=8201df86-57c9-428c-b31c-18125a54265c&skip= 35 F.E. Kuo, “Environment and Crime in the Inner City: Does Vegetation Reduce Crime?” Environment and Behavior, Volume 33, pp 343-367. 36 Nowak, David J., “Benefits of Community Trees”, (Brooklyn Trees, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, in review). 37 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 2010”, Outdoor Foundation, 2010. 38 Paul M. Sherer, “The Benefits of Parks: Why America Needs More City Parks and Open Space,” The Trust for Public Land, San Francisco, CA, 2006. 39 Cited in: Sally Russell, “Nature Break: Five Minutes of Green Nurture”, Green Nurture Blog, http://blog.greennurture.com/tag/journal-of-environmental-science-and-technology, Accessed on November 14, 2012. 40 National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), “NRPA Completes Agency Survey Regarding Children and Nature,” http://www.narrp.org/assets/Library/Children_in_Nature/ nrpa_survey_regarding_children_and_nature_2007.pdf, April 2007. 41 Margaret Ahrweiler,” Call of the Wild – From beautiful blossoms to bugs and guts, nature programs are growing as people return to their roots” Recreation Management Magazine, Http://recmanagement.com/200310fe04.php, October 2003. 42 Richard Louv, Last Child in the Woods: Saving Children from Nature Deficit Disorder, Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2005. 43 “What is the Nature Explore Program”, http://www.arborday.org/explore/documents/ NE_FAQ_002.pdf, accessed on August 12, 2012. 44 2012 Sport/Recreation Activity Participation”, National Sporting Goods Association, 2013, http://www.nsga.org. 45 “2012 Sports, Fitness and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report”, Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (renamed Sports and Fitness Industry Association in 2012, http://www.sfia.org/reports/all/. 46 Ten-Year History of Sports Participation (2001-2011), National Sporting Goods Association, 2012, http://www.nsga.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3346. 47“2011 vs 2001 Youth Sports Participation”, National Sporting Goods Association, 2012, http://www.nsga.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3494. 48 Evans and Trachtenberg, “Lacrosse Muscles It’s Way West,” Wall Street Journal, May, 2009. 49 “2011 Preview: U.S. Trends in Team Sports, Fall 2011”, SMGA, 2011. 50 Chris Gelbach, “Never Stop Playing: Trends in Adult Recreational Sports” Recreation Management, September 2013, http://recmanagement.com/feature_print.php?fid=201309fe02, Accessed January 2015. 51 David Crumpler, “Pickleball a fast-growing sport, especially for the 50 and older crowd”, Florida Times Union, January 26, 2015, http://jacksonville.com/prime-time/2015-01-26/story/pickleball-fast-growing- sport-especially-50-and-older-crowd, Accessed January 2015. 52 “Outdoor Recreation Participation Report 2014”, Outdoor Foundation, 2014. 26 53 “Recent Outdoor Recreation Trends”, USDA Forest Service Internet Research Information Series (IRIS) Research Brief, January 2012, http://warnell.forestry.uga.edu/nrrt/nsre/IRISRec/ IRISRec23rpt.pdf, accessed August, 2012. 54 Hope Nardini, “Bike Tourism a Rising Trend”, Ethic Traveler, http://www.ethicaltraveler.org/2012/08/bike-tourism-a-rising-trend/, Accessed on Marcy 24, 2014. 55 Michelle Baran, “New trend: Urban bike tours in Los Angeles and New York”, Budget Travel Blog, http://www.budgettravel.com/blog/new-trend-urban-bike-tours-in-los-angeles-and-new-york,11772/, accessed on March 24, 2014 56 Steven Pease, “Fat bikes, how to get the most out of winter cycling”, Minnesota Cycling Examiner, http://www.examiner.com/article/fat-bikes-the-latest-trend-adventure-cycling, February 1, 2014. 57 National Council on Disability, “Livable Communities for Adults with Disabilities”, December 2004, http://www.ncd.gov/publications/2004/12022004. 58 www.ICMA.org, Accessed in 2012. 59 U.S. Department of Justice, Americans with Disabilities Act, ADA Home Page, http://www.ada.gov/, accessed on November 15, 2012. 60Aaron Smith, “Mobile Access 2010”, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Pew Research Center, July 7, 2010, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile-Access-2010/Summary-of-Findings.aspx, Accessed on November 15, 2012. 61 Erik Sass, “Minority Groups Heaviest Users of Mobile Net”, Media Daily News, Nov. 18, 2011, http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/162699/minority-groups-heaviest-users-of-mobile- net.html#axzz2CK9zYGFw, Accessed on November 15, 2012. GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service Less Access More Access No Access Alte rnative Provider GR ASP® Leve l of Se rvice Les s Ac ces s More Acc ess GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master Plan BCity of Meridian, IdahoMap B: Composite Level of Service Perspective ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold No Access Alte rnative Provider GR ASP® Leve l of Se rvice Les s Ac ces s More Acc ess GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master Plan BCity of Meridian, IdahoMap B: Composite Level of Service Perspective ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold No Access Alte rnative Provider GR ASP® Leve l of Se rvice Les s Ac ces s More Acc ess GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master Plan BCity of Meridian, IdahoMap B: Composite Level of Service Perspective ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold No Access Alternative Provider GRA SP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master Plan BCity of Meridian, IdahoMap B: Composite Level of Service Perspective ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold No Access GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master Plan BCity of Meridian, IdahoMap B: Composite Level of Service Perspective ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emeral d Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northvi ew G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Property Boise Property Joint-Use School Property School Property WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pathwa y Micro Path Highways, Roads & Stree ts Limited Acc ess Highway Major Road Local Roa d Minor Road Other Road Waterway Water Body Meridian City Limit ´0 1 2 3½Miles Parks and Recreation Master PlanMap A: System Resources ACity of Meridian, Idaho Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent F or Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From T hose Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emeral d Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northvi ew G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Overall Trail S egment Length Sh orter Leng th Longer Le ngth GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Property Boise Property Joint-Use School Property School Property WARD Property Highways, Roads & Stree ts Limited Acc ess Highway Major Road Local Roa d Minor Road Other Road Waterway Water Body Meridian City Limit ´0 1 2 3½Miles Parks and Recreation Master PlanMap D: Trails & Recreational Connectivity DCity of Meridian, Idaho Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent F or Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From T hose Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service Less Access More Access No Access Alternative Provider GRA SP® Level of Service Less Access More Access GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master PlanMap C: Walkability Level of Service Perspective CCity of Meridian, Idaho ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold No Access Alternative Provider GRA SP® Level of Service Less Access More Access GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master PlanMap C: Walkability Level of Service Perspective CCity of Meridian, Idaho ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold No Access Alternative Provider GRA SP® Level of Service Less Access More Access GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master PlanMap C: Walkability Level of Service Perspective CCity of Meridian, Idaho ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold No Access Alternative Provider GRA SP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master PlanMap C: Walkability Level of Service Perspective CCity of Meridian, Idaho ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF GF Settlers Park South Meridian P roperty Heroes Park Fuller Park C.F. McDevitt Park Borup/Bottles Properties Tully Park Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Lakeview Golf Course Sawtooth Middle School Storey Park Lewis & Clark Middle School Bear Creek Park Lake Hazel Middle School Lowell Scott Middle School Jabil Fields Gordon Harris Park Seasons Park Chateau Park Hunter Elementary School Pioneer School of t he Arts Sycamore Park Cottonwood Park Siena Elementary School Prospect Elementary School Meridian E lementary School Peppermint Park Chaparral Elementary School River Valley E lementary School Ponderosa Elementary School Champion P ark Joplin Elementary School Peregrine Elementary School Ustick Elementary School Renaissance Park Discovery Elementary School Spalding STEM Academy Lake Hazel Elementary School Silver S age Elementary School Barbara Morgan Stem Academy Chief Joseph Elementary School Summerwind Elementary SchoolPathways Middle School Desert Sage Elementary School Andrus Elementary School Christine Donnell School of the Arts Gateway S chool of Language & Culture Mary McPherson Elementary School Pepper Ridge Elementary School Bainbridge S ubdivision William Watson Crossroads Middle School City Hall Plaza Cameron Park Settlers Village Park Centennial Park Fire Stat ion No.4 Park 8th Street Park Meridian S wimming Pool Generations Plaza Cox Monument YMCA Homecourt Meridian Library Meridian Academy Chamber of Commerce Meridian S enior Center Cole Valley Christian S chool Willow Creek Elementary School Boys and Girls Club Meridian Middle School Heritage Middle School Meridian Community Cent er Paramount Elementary School §¨¦84 §¨¦184 §¨¦84 £¤20 Frank lin Ustick E a g l e C o l e F i v e M i l e Overland C l o v e r d a l e Victory Fai rview C a n A d a C u r t i s Emerald Edna Hill Mcmillan Cherry M a p l e G r o v e M i l w a u k e e Mountain View T e n M i l e Northview G o w e n G l e n w o o d C o l l i s t e r Castle Marigold Goddard Lake Hazel G a r y P i e r c e P a r k O r c h a r d G a r r i t y Elgin F r o n t i e r G a r r e t t 44th W r i g h t M a p l e G r o v e Vic tory C u r t i s UV69 UV44 UV55 Legend Meridian GR ASP® Level of Service At or Above Threshold Below Threshold No Access GF Indoor Facility Meridian Property Bureau of Reclamation Prope rty Bois e Property Joint-Use School Proper ty School Pr oper ty WARD Property Trails Ex is ting Pa thw ay Micr o Path Highway s, R oa ds & Stre ets Limited Acc ess Highway Ma jor Road Local Road Minor R oad Other Road Waterw ay Water Body Meridian City Limit Parks and Recreation Master PlanMap C: Walkability Level of Service Perspective CCity of Meridian, Idaho ® 0 1 2½Miles Map Produced For City of Pearl and - By The GRASP® TeamThis Map Is Intended For Planning & Discussion Purposes Only -Please Refer To The Project Docum ent For Map DetailsLegend Elements M ay Vary Slightly In Size, Color A nd Transparency From Those Shown On M apGIS Data Sources M ay Include: City of Meridian, ESRI, GRA SP® Team - April 2015Copyright© 2015 City of M eridian pEa. PPAP. - nRaTeR - l 9 o { OMSTINS RESIDENCE m.. krzooi Q 0 ESTREDU E�e RRI i iM�xu+EE ' Iy d 4THLETe1ELOE € oISKLEERLL1 LER1 �' IS CWRIa I,I ERa,Lni EA .� Eienxa I� i wEP i Wo r— .. ✓est Cherry pane NOTE: Project will be phased. scalp Parking 399 0 lop 200 Over11ow Parking 114 Total Parking Number 613 TR West Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks&Recreation Design Concept #1 -Softball Complex GREE IMLBaplip i9pB In FB/b. flBG9albn 11 Meridian, Idaho 83642 mnoyeaspxe coawroa¢ 0 100 200 South Meridian Future Regional Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Meridian, Idaho 83642 Design Concept PARKS MAINTENANCE YARD DOG PARK (FENCED) SHELTER SHELTER SHELTER RESTROOM SHELTER RESTROOM CONCESSIONS TOT LOTART ART ART FISHING POND TENNIS COURT COMMUNITY GARDENS ST R E A M B R I D G E DROPOFF PLAYGROUND SAND VOLLEYBALL BASKETBALL SPLASH PAD DROPOFF PICKLEBALL DROPOFF ZONE ART PERIMETER PATH PLAZAPLAZA DOCK 3 0 0 ’ 200’ ATHLETIC FIELDS MULTI-SPORT PARKING (212) (90) (362) (70) (45) (46) (312) FUTURE RESIDENTIAL NOTE: Project will be phased. Parking 977 Overflow Parking 160 Total Parking Number 1137 SOFTBALL FIELD SEATING RESTROOM WELL HOUSE Margaret Aldape Park Meridian Parks & Recreation Meridian, Idaho 83642 Design Concept 0 100 200 SCALE DROP OFF FUTURE POND THRO U G H C O N N E C T I O N AMPHITHEATER RESTROOM SHELTER ART PA R K I N G MARGARET POND (EXISTING) BOIS E R I V E R PARKING (167) ART MEADOW PLANTINGS LAWN (IRRIGATED) PICNIC SHELTER LAWN (IRRIGATED) PA R K I N G (1 5 0 ) S L O U G H & HIG H W A T E R SE A S O N A L (1 9 3 ) FISHING DOCK BOAT DROP OFF SHELTER RESTROOM ART PRIMARY VEHICULAR ACCESSBEACH B O I S E R I V E R TO ART ART ART DISC GOLF COURSE DISC GOLF COURSEDISC GOLF COURSE BEACH APPROXIMATE FLOODWAY BOUNDARY SLO U G H (14) NOTES • THIS IS A PRELIMINARY CONCEPT, INTENDED TO SHOW POSSIBILITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE MARGARET ALDAPE PARK SITE. • NO SURVEY DATA WAS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THIS CONCEPT WAS PREPARED. BASE INFORMATION WAS COMPILED FROM EXISTING BOUNDARY DATA AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY. • THIS PRELIMINARY CONCEPT HAS NOT YET BEEN PRESENTED IN A PUBLIC FORUM, AND DID NOT UNDERGO AN INDIVIDUAL PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS. • ROADS AND PARKING AREAS MAY BE PAVED OR SURFACED WITH PERMEABLE PAVERS OR COMPACTED GRAVEL, TO BE DETERMINED. PUBLIC ART • ART WILL BE FOCUSED PRIMARILY ON ALDAPE FAMILY HISTORY, BASQUE CULTURAL HERITAGE, LOCAL WILDLIFE AND RELATED THEMES • ART ELEMENTS WILL BE INTEGRATED WITH PARK ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES • ART WILL BE PLACED SO AS TO CREATE A SENSE OF DISCOVERY FOR PARK VISITORS GREENBELT VEHICULAR/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, TYP. MEADOW PLANTINGS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, TYP. EXISTING UNDERSTORY VEGETATION, TYP. EXISTING TREES, TYP. ART ART ART ART DRAFTDRAFT PEDE—A ens D STR� K f n x�GGEx�E y -- / ..x,E.ID.E� -DDII —MUNI =1 11m. Mm in fii- in .: r G f OUR7 = ooD AREA l Oml � r IWeIG Scale _ NOTE: Project will be phased. o too zuo - �� � _. Total Parking Number 604 ® West Meridian Regional Park Meridian Parks&Recreation Design Concept #2 -Multi Sport GREE nre4a0NpFOpeNGeM, Pe<2Btlon Meridian, Idaho 83642 aeoa�syama�urvnaq