The URL can be used to link to this page

Traffic Impact StudyTraffic Impact Study Graycliff Subdivision Meridian, Idaho Prepared for: Engineering Solutions, LLP Prepared by: SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA May 4, 2015 �SS�oNai ENc O!� GISTEl�F �09 OF 6�-- P� q NG E?� TGRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MERIDIAN, IDAHO Table of Contents ReportSummary........................................................................................................................................1 ProposedDevelopment...........................................................................................................................1 Proposed Mitigation for Existing Traffic...................................................................................................1 Proposed Mitigation for 2019 (Build -Out) Background Traffic.................................................................1 Proposed Mitigation for 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic..................................................2 ProposedDevelopment.............................................................................................................................3 ProjectDescription...................................................................................................................................3 StudyApproach.........................................................................................................................................5 StudyArea ............................ ................ .......................... ._.................................................................... 5 StudyPeriod...........................................................................................................................................5 Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions...................................................................................................6 RoadwayNetwork....................................................................................................................................6 TransitService.........................................................................................................................................6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities.............................................................................................................6 TrafficVolumes........................................................................................................................................6 Existing Intersection Crash Data.............................................................................................................9 Levelof Service.....................................................................................................................................10 RoadwaySegment LOS....................................................................................................................10 IntersectionLOS................................................................................................................................11 Existing Traffic Mitigation.......................................................................................................................13 Harris Street and Meridian Road.......................................................................................................13 19 Analysis of 2019 (Build -Out) Background Traffic Conditions. Roadway Network...................................................................... Transit Service........................................................................... Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ............................................... Traffic Volumes.......................................................................... Off -Site Development................................................................ Level of Service......................................................................... Roadway Segment LOS ........................................................ IntersectionLOS.................................................................... 2019 (Build -Out) Background Traffic Mitigation ......................... Analysis of 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic Conditions...... TripGeneration............................................................................................... M ...........19 ...........19 0 SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2075 PAGE I ................................................. ..14 ........................................................14 ........................................................14 ........................................................14 ........................................................14 ........................................................15 ........................................................16 ........................................................16 ........................................................16 19 Analysis of 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic Conditions...... TripGeneration............................................................................................... M ...........19 ...........19 0 SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2075 PAGE I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCME SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO TripCapture......................................................................... Pass -By Trips...................................................................... DivertedTrips...................................................................... Trip Distribution and Assignment ......................................... Site Plus Background Traffic ............................................... Level of Service................................................................... Roadway Segment LOS .................................................. Intersection LOS.............................................................. 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic Mitigation.... SiteCirculation..................................................................... Summary of Results............................................................. Existing Traffic Conditions .................................................. 2019 (Build -out) Background Traffic Conditions ................. 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic Conditions. Appendix A: Existing Traffic Counts ................................. Appendix B: Historic Crash Data and Intersection Crash Appendix C: Analysis Reports — Existing Traffic ............. Appendix D: Turn Lane Warrant Worksheets ................... Appendix E: COMPASS Forecasts ..................................... ................... 26 ................... 26 ................... 26 ................... 26 .................... A .................... B .................... C .................... D ..................... E Appendix F: Off -Site Trip Generation Summary........................................................................... Appendix G: Analysis Reports — 2019 (Build -Out) Background Traffic ..................................... Appendix H: Signal Warrant Worksheets.. .................................................................................... Appendix I: Analysis Reports — 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic ...................... List of Figures Figure 1. Preliminary site plan .......................................... Figure 2. Existing roadway network .................................. Figure 3. 2014 existing traffic ............................................ Figure 4. 2019 (Build -out) background traffic .................... Figure 5. Site traffic distribution ........................................ Figure 6. 2019 (Build -out) site traffic ................................. Figure 7. 2019 (Build -out) site plus background traffic ..... F G H ...... I ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 11 T TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO List of Tables Table 1. Crash data summary (2009 to 2013)............................................................................................9 Table 2. ACHD LOS standards for roadway segments............................................................................10 Table 3. Roadway segment LOS — 2014 existing traffic...........................................................................11 Table 4. Intersection MOEs — 2014 existing traffic...................................................................................12 Table 5. Lane group v/c ratios — 2014 existing traffic...............................................................................13 Table 6. Roadway segment LOS — 2019 (Build -out) background traffic...................................................16 Table 7. Intersection MOEs — 2019 (Build -out) background traffic...........................................................17 Table 8. Lane group v/c ratios — 2019 (Build -out) background traffic.......................................................18 Table 9. 2019 (Build -out) trip generation summary...................................................................................19 Table 10. Roadway segment LOS — 2019 (Build -out) site plus background traffic...................................23 Table 11. Intersection MOEs — 2019 (Build -out) site plus background traffic...........................................24 Table 12. Lane group v/c ratios — 2019 (Build -out) site plus background traffic.......................................25 ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE III TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Report Summary GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO This study was prepared in compliance with the Ada County Highway District's (ACHD's) requirements for Traffic Impact Studies listed in Section 7106 of the current ACHD Policy Manual. It evaluates the traffic impacts generated by the proposed Graycliff Subdivision. An Initial Meeting was not held with ACHD for this study; however, the study area, scope and analysis requirements were verified with ACHD staff - see Study Approach on page 5. The study's principal findings and recommendations are summarized below. Proposed Development The Graycliff Subdivision is a proposed 52.01 -acre residential development located west of Meridian Road between Harris Street and Amity Road within the Meridian City limits in Ada County (see Figure 1 on page 4). The expected build -out year is 2019 with the proposed land uses consisting of: • 119 single-family dwelling lots 2. A collector street is proposed to be constructed along the western site boundary which will connect to the existing Harris Street collector for access to the roadway system. Proposed Mitigation for Existing Traffic 3. For the existing traffic conditions analyzed with the existing roadway lane configurations, all study area roadways meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds. As a result, no roadway improvements are needed to mitigate existing traffic. 4. For the existing traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, all study area intersections meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds. One intersection is expected to meet turn lane warrants based on Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) guidelines: Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. The following intersection improvements are needed to mitigate existing traffic at the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection: • Right -turn lane on southbound approach Proposed Mitigation for 2019 (Build -Out) Background Traffic 5. For the 2019 background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing roadway lane configurations, all study area roadways meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds. As a result, no roadway improvements are needed to mitigate the 2016 background traffic. 6. For the 2019 background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding improvements, one study area intersection is expected to exceed ACHD's minimum operational thresholds: Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. The Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection is not expected to meet warrants for a traffic signal. The following intersection improvements are needed to mitigate 2019 background traffic at the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection: • A second lane on eastbound approach to provide an exclusive left -turn lane Six MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 20'15 PAGE 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Proposed Mitigation for 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic 7. For the 2019 site plus background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing roadway lane configurations, all study area roadways meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds. As a result, no roadway improvements are needed to mitigate the 2019 site plus background traffic. 8. For the 2019 site plus background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements, one study area intersection is expected to exceed ACHD's minimum operational thresholds: Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. The Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection is not expected to meet warrants for a traffic signal. As a result, no intersection improvements beyond those identified for the preceding mitigation are recommended to mitigate the 2019 site plus background traffic. 9. The maximum expected traffic volume on Kentucky Way is approximately 2,130 vehicles per day (vpd), which is within the ADT threshold of 5,000 vpd on existing collector streets in residential areas with front -on housing as defined by Section 7206.3.7 of the ACHD Policy Manual. The maximum ADT allowed on new collector streets in residential areas with front -on housing is 3,000 vpd. 10. All internal local streets are projected to carry less than the 2,000 vpd threshold on local streets as defined by Section 7207.1 and Section 7207.3 of the ACHD Policy Manual. ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Proposed Development Project Description GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Graycliff Subdivision is a proposed 52.01 -acre residential development located west of Meridian Road between Harris Street and Amity Road in Meridian, Idaho. Figure 1 on page 4 shows the preliminary site plan for the development with the proposed land uses, internal circulation and site access to the existing roadway system. Graycliff Subdivision is estimated to contain a total of 119 single-family lots with an expected 2019 build -out year. The multi -family future development lot is not a part of Graycliff Subdivision and was not included in this study. The development is proposing to construct a collector street along the western site boundary connecting to the existing Harris Street collector for access to the roadway system. Two driveways are planned to be constructed on the proposed collector street. SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCME SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Figure 1. Preliminary site plan SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 4 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Study Approach GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO This TIS follows the requirements for Traffic Impact Studies listed in Section 7106 of the current ACHD Policy Manual. An Initial Meeting was not held with ACHD for this study; however, the scope and study area were verified with ACHD staff. As approved by ACHD, this TIS follows the same general requirements as the TIS for the Biltmore Estates Subdivision, which is located adjacent to the site. No new traffic counts were required for this TIS. At the time of this study, the Meridian Road interchange and 1-84 between Meridian Road and Five Mile Road were under construction, which was likely impacting traffic volumes on Meridian Road. Therefore, 2014 traffic counts collected for the Biltmore Estates Subdivision study were used for this TIS. Study Area The following external study area roadway segments and intersections were identified by ACHD for the traffic impact analysis: • Study area roadway segments: o Victory Road between Kentucky Way and Meridian Road o Kentucky Way between Harris Street and Victory Road o Harris Street west of Meridian Road • Study area intersections: o Victory Road and Kentucky Way o Victory Road and Meridian Road o Harris Street and Meridian Road Study Period The study periods are: • 2014 (Existing) • 2019 (Build -out) The following time intervals were identified for analysis: • Weekday AM peak hour • Weekday PM peak hour �� SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCME SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions Roadway Network Figure 2 on page 7 illustrates the existing roadway network, intersection control and channelization in the study area. The roadway functional classification is based on the current adopted 2035 Functional Classification Map for Ada County maintained by Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS). A brief description of the existing roadways serving the development follows. Meridian Road (SH 69) is functionally classified as a principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 55 mph. It is a north -south state highway and has two lanes in each direction with a center turn lane. It has a rural section without curb, gutter or sidewalk within the study area. Victory Road is functionally classified as a minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. It is an east -west roadway and has one lane in each direction with sidewalk or multi -use path on the north side between Stoddard Road and Meridian Road. There is also curb and gutter on the north side of the road from Meridian Road to the canal crossing. The rest of the roadway segment within the study area does not have curb, gutter or sidewalk. Kentucky Way is functionally classified as a collector street with a posted limit of 25 mph. It has one lane in each direction and currently ends at the existing Kentucky Ridge Subdivision southern boundary. Kentucky Way has curb, gutter and sidewalk with front -on housing within the existing Kentucky Ridge Subdivision. Currently, there is no curb, gutter or sidewalk on Kentucky Way for a distance of approximately 750 feet south of Victory Road. Harris Street is functionally classified as a collector street with a posted speed limit of 20 mph. It is an east -west roadway and has one lane in each direction. Harris Street has curb, gutter and sidewalk on the north side of the road. Harris Street ends approximately 1,320 feet west of Meridian Road. Transit Service There is currently no transit service in the study area. Carpooling and vanpooling programs are available for the area through ACHD Commuteride and Valley Regional Transit (VRT). Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities The study area roadways have limited sidewalks and multi -use path. There are signalized crosswalks at the Victory Road and Meridian Road intersection. There are no other mid -block pedestrian or school crossings in the study area. Traffic Volumes Existing average daily traffic (ADT) and peak hour intersection turning movements were obtained from the Biltmore Estates Subdivision TIS. The peak hour traffic and average ADT for the study roadways were collected in January 2014. Figure 3 on page 8 displays a summary of the existing traffic counts, which are included in Appendix A. aSIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY p O 0 0 O w GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO NTS VICTORY ROAD HARRIS STREET =Tlzj '�`1- •I [21 RUMPLE LANE GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISIONI ISI LEGEND: PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL p COLLECTOR STREET 0¢ [XI NUMBER OF LANES Z + CHANNELIZATION S TRAFFIC SIGNAL STOP SIGN 0 STUDY INTERSECTION Figure 2. Existing roadway network SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAYO, 2075 PAGE 7 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1 HARRIS 16(33) j 103(54) , 4_ 93(149) 30 110 `2812 ) PQ`O mN m'^ m GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO NTS VICTORY ROAD LltiL� �i p'p RUMPLE LANE 10 o�D1� 43) oo� b o LEGEND: — PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL — MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR STREET p XX(XX) AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) FX—,XXXI AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (VPD) K J- CHANNELIZATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL STOP SIGN 0 STUDY INTERSECTION Figure 3. 2014 existing traffic SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 8 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Existing Intersection Crash Data GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO The most current five years of historic crash data were obtained from ITD for the study intersections to assess the existing intersection crash rates and for use in the signal warrant analysis. Crash data is included in Appendix B. Table 1 summarizes the crashes, base crash rates and existing crash rates for the study intersections. ITD 2658 Safety Evaluation forms are attached. There were no reported crashes at the Victory Road and Kentucky Way intersection and Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection between 2009 and 2013. The calculated existing crash rate for the Victory Road and Meridian Road intersection is 0.31 accidents per million vehicles (ACC/MV), which is below the base rate of 0.58 ACC/MV for a similar intersection type in Idaho (Type 33). Table 1. Crash data summary (2009 to 2013) Intersection Total Crashes Total Injury Crashes Total Fatal Crashes(ACC/MV)' Base Rate Existing Crash Rate (ACCIMV) Victory Road and Kentucky Way No Reported Crashes 1.30 NA Victory Road and Meridian Road 16 7 0 0.58 0.31 Harris Street and Meridian Road No Reported Crashes 0.58 N/A *The base rate is the number of crashes expected to occur on a roadway or intersection in Idaho with similar travel lanes and volumes. ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 9 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Level of Service GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Roadway Segment LOS AND has developed level of service (LOS) standards for roadway segments based on directional peak hour volumes for various roadway functional classifications, number of lanes and left -turn treatments. Based on the current ACHD Policy Manual, the minimum acceptable level of service for a roadway segment is LOS E for principal arterials and LOS D for minor arterials and collectors. Table 2 summarizes ACHD's LOS standards for roadway segments. ACHD does not have LOS standards for local streets, but an ADT for new and existing local streets is typically less than 2,000 vehicles per day (vpd) as defined in Section 7207.1 and Section 7207.3 of the current ACHD Policy Manual. Table 2. ACHD LOS standards for roadway segments ACHD Policy Manual, Section 7106.4.1, Table 2 ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 10 No. of Threshold Volume Through v h LOS D LOS E Functional Classification Lanes Principal Arterial No Left -Turn Lanes 1 550 690 1 750 880 Continuous Center Left -Turn Lane 2 1,600 1,770 3 2,440 2,660 1 790 920 Median -Control, Channelized Left- 2 1,680 1,860 Turn Lanes at Major Intersections 3 2,560 2,790 Minor Arterial No Left -Turn Lanes 1 550 690 1 720 8802 Unrestricted Median, Continuous Left -Turn Lane 1,540 1,770 3 2,370 2,660 1 760 920 Median -Control, Channelized Left- 2 1,620 1,860 Turn Lanes at Major Intersections 3 2,490 2,790 Collector No Left -Turn Lanes 1 425 525 Unrestricted Median, Continuous 1 530 660 Center Left -Turn Lane 2 1,080 1,250 ACHD Policy Manual, Section 7106.4.1, Table 2 ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 10 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Table 3 summarizes the existing LOS for roadway segments in the study area. With the existing lane configuration and existing traffic, all study area roadway segments are below ACHD's threshold traffic volumes. No roadway improvements are needed to mitigate the existing traffic. Table 3. Roadway segment LOS — 2014 existing traffic Intersection LOS To determine the existing traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with existing traffic and the existing intersection control and lane configurations. For signalized, unsignalized and roundabout intersections, ACHD utilizes the Transportation Research Board's 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (2010 HCM) methodologies to determine the level of service. Intersection LOS ratings are based on the average control delay per vehicle and the intersection volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. The maximum overall intersection v/c ratio is 0.90 for signalized intersections. The intersection v/c ratio for roundabouts and unsignalized intersections is undefined by the 2010 HCM. The maximum lane group v/c ratio for the signalized and unsignalized intersections is 1.0, and 0.85 for roundabouts. The existing traffic operations were analyzed using Synchro 8 (806.77), which utilizes the 2010 HCM methodologies. The intersections were evaluated with the existing intersection control, lane configurations and peak hour volumes. All parameters used in the analysis were based on existing data when available or default values as recommended in Section 7106.6.2 of the ACHD Policy Manual, when not available. Synchro reports of the existing traffic analysis are included in Appendix C. Tables 4 and 5 on pages 12 and 13 summarize the intersection measures of effectiveness (MOES) during the AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. MILE 6 SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA Mar 4, 2015 PAGE 11 Threshold AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. of Volume (vph) Major Direction Major Direction LOS LOS Volume Volume Functional Through Left -Turn Roadway Segment Class Lanes Treatment D E (v h) LOS (vph) LOS Victory Road Kentucky Way to Meridian Road Minor Arterial 1 No LT Lane 550 690 167 < D 220 < D Kentucky Way Victory Road Collector 1 No LT Lane 425 525 40 < D 41 < D to Harris Street Harris Street West of Collector 1 No LT Lane 425 525 21 < D 18 < D Meridian Road Intersection LOS To determine the existing traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with existing traffic and the existing intersection control and lane configurations. For signalized, unsignalized and roundabout intersections, ACHD utilizes the Transportation Research Board's 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (2010 HCM) methodologies to determine the level of service. Intersection LOS ratings are based on the average control delay per vehicle and the intersection volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. The maximum overall intersection v/c ratio is 0.90 for signalized intersections. The intersection v/c ratio for roundabouts and unsignalized intersections is undefined by the 2010 HCM. The maximum lane group v/c ratio for the signalized and unsignalized intersections is 1.0, and 0.85 for roundabouts. The existing traffic operations were analyzed using Synchro 8 (806.77), which utilizes the 2010 HCM methodologies. The intersections were evaluated with the existing intersection control, lane configurations and peak hour volumes. All parameters used in the analysis were based on existing data when available or default values as recommended in Section 7106.6.2 of the ACHD Policy Manual, when not available. Synchro reports of the existing traffic analysis are included in Appendix C. Tables 4 and 5 on pages 12 and 13 summarize the intersection measures of effectiveness (MOES) during the AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. MILE 6 SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA Mar 4, 2015 PAGE 11 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO All study area intersections are currently operating at LOS D or better with a v/c ratio of 0.76 or less for all lane groups during the peak hours with the existing traffic conditions. No intersection capacity improvements are needed to mitigate the existing traffic. Table 4. Intersection MOEs - 2014 existing traffic aSIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 12 AM(PM) Peak Volumes, Control and AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Channelization MOE Hour Hour LOS NB A A Delay (s) Victory Road _ x.98731 NS 9 9 and %- Intersection Kentucky Way 135159 - ^` = v/c Max Lane 0.05 (NB) 0.03 (NB) Group v/c _ LOS B B -"o Ha- 1 931x91 Victory Road �111�_ 28126) Delay (s) 17 19 and ��- Intersection 0.62 0.67 Meridian Road 16133I 1 _ 11_ 03(50) — � v/c Max Lane - Group v/c 0.70 (EBT) 0.74 (WBR) - LOS (EB/WB) C/C D/B Harris Street m^� i'o -n - or, 131 Delay (s) (EB/WB) 16/15 27/10 and Meridian Road 17(1510© u_ 4� iv/c ntersection om Max Lane 0.07 (EB) 0.10 (EB) - Group v/c aSIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 12 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCME SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Table 5. Lane group vlc ratios - 2014 existing traffic Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LT THRU RT LT THRU RT Victory Road and Kentucky Way NB 0.05 0.03 SB EB - - WB < 0.01 0.03 Victory Road and Meridian Road NB 0.03 0.62 0.62 0.07 0.29 0.29 SB 0.36 0.16 0.01 0.20 0.56 0.03 EB 0.08 0.70 0.18 0.49 WB 0.20 0.16 0.58 0.52 0.46 0.74 Harris Street and Meridian Road NB - e 0.01 SB < 0.01 EB 0.07 0.10 WB <0.01 <0.01 Existing Traffic Mitigation No roadway improvements are needed to mitigate existing traffic; however, intersection improvements will be needed at the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection as discussed below. Harris Street and Meridian Road The eastbound minor movements at the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection are currently operating at LOS D, which requires a traffic signal warrant analysis according to ACHD policy. 24-hour approach traffic counts were not collected for the analysis; however, in reviewing the existing turning movement traffic, it was concluded that the intersection does not meet warrants for a traffic signal. The peak hourly volume on the Harris Street approach is 21 vph during the AM peak hour and 18 vph during the PM peak hour, which is below the minimum hourly volume requirement for Warrant 1 (Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume) and Warrant 2 (Four -Hour Vehicular Volume). For a major street with speeds exceeding 40 mph, the minimum hourly volume (70 percent factor) on the minor -street approach with one lane is 53 vph for Warrant 1 and 60 vph for Warrant 2. The Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection does not have the crash history to meet Warrant 7 (Crash Experience) for a traffic signal. There were no reported crashes at the intersection between 2009 and 2013. Turn lane analysis was conducted at the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection in accordance with ITD right -turn turn lane analysis guidelines. A southbound right -turn lane is warranted for existing traffic mitigation - see Appendix D for turn lane warrant worksheets. ''I SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 13 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCME SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Analysis of 2019 (Build -Out) Background Traffic Conditions Roadway Network The 2019 roadway network in the study area remains the same as existing with the exception of the southbound right -turn lane improvement at the intersection of Harris Street and Meridian Road needed to mitigate existing traffic and proposed roadways within the off-site developments. There are no funded improvements for the study roadways and intersections according to the current ACHD Five -Year Work Plan (2015-2019 FYWP) and ITD's 2015-2019 Five -Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan (]TIP). There are planned improvements for the study roadways according to the South Meridian Transportation Plan: • Extend Kentucky Way to Amity Road as a residential collector street • Extend Harris Street to Linder Road as a residential collector street The Biltmore Estates Subdivision is proposing to extend Kentucky Way to Harris Street. Transit Service VRT plans to provide transit service on Meridian Road in its comprehensive alternative transportation system vision. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ACHD's current FYWP does not have bicycle or pedestrian improvement projects designated for the study roadways. However, there are multi -use path, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities planned in the study area according the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan and ACHD Roadways to Bike Ways Plan. Traffic Volumes COMPASS provided 2015, 2018 and 2020 traffic forecasts for the study area, which are included in Appendix E. Based on the forecasts, the COMPASS model shows an annual growth rate of approximately 2.5 percent on Victory Road and 4.5 percent on Meridian Road. The 2019 background traffic on Victory Road and Meridian Road was estimated based on the COMPASS model annual growth rates. Background traffic growth is not expected on Kentucky Way and Harris Street based on COMPASS demographics forecasts, except for off-site traffic as discussed below. For Rumple Lane, the COMPASS model forecasted higher traffic growth compared to Harris Street (60 percent higher) and Victory Road (90 percent higher). The traffic growth on Rumple Lane is not expected to be this high considering there are no platted or planned developments in the area at the time of this study. Based on demographics forecasts and build -out timeframe, we assumed 25 percent of the COMPASS model 2019 forecasted traffic growth on Rumple Lane. Figure 4 on page 15 summarizes 2019 background traffic. ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 14 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Off -Site Development Traffic generated by three off-site developments within the vicinity of the study area is included in the 2019 background traffic volumes: • Fall Creek Subdivision — 296 single-family lots • Biltmore Estates Subdivision —159 single-family lots • Revolution Ridge Development — 64 single-family lots The off-site traffic generation summary is included in Appendix F. HARRIS 136(73) L2 (22)T it )� l Jl SGC_ <N GRAYCLIFF Q� SUBDIVISION 6 O Q O f _M__ RUMPLE LANE �1 NTS 0 ro rZ�?M Q]NN NDN p1e�IL 105(169) LEGEND: ---41(149) 34(151) VICTORY ROAD 136(73) L2 (22)T it )� l Jl SGC_ <N GRAYCLIFF Q� SUBDIVISION 6 O Q O f _M__ RUMPLE LANE �1 ti' Q]NN NDN m LEGEND: ^ — PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL — MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR STREET XX(XX) AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) X,XXX AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (VPD) �- CHANNELIZATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4F STOP SIGN 0 STUDY INTERSECTION Figure 4. 2019 (Build -out) background traffic ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 15 TGRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MERIDIAN, IDAHO Level of Service Roadway Segment LOS Table 6 summarizes the LOS for roadway segments in the study area for the expected 2019 background peak hour traffic conditions. With the existing lane configurations and 2019 background traffic, all study area roadway segments are below ACHD's threshold traffic volumes. Table 6. Roadway segment LOS — 2019 (Build -out) background traffic Intersection LOS To determine Phase 1 background traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with 2019 background traffic and the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements. Traffic analysis reports are included in Appendix G. Tables 7 and 8 on pages 17 and 18 summarize the intersection performance measures with the 2019 background traffic. With 2019 background traffic, all study area intersections are expected to continue to operate at LOS C or better with v/c ratio of 0.76 or less for all lane groups, with the exception of the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. It is projected to operate at LOS F with v/c ratio of 0.40 on the eastbound approach during the AM peak hour. ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 16 Threshold AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. of Volume (vph) Major Direction Major Direction Functional Through Left -Turn LOS LOS Volume Volume Roadway Segment Class Lanes Treatment D E (vph) LOS (vph) LOS Victory Road Kentucky Way Minor 1 No LT Lane 550 690 250 < D 324 < D to Meridian Road Arterial Kentucky Way Victory Road Collector 1 No LT Lane 425 525 106 < D 117 < D to Harris Street Harris Street West of Collector 1 No LT Lane 425 525 69 < D 64 < D Meridian Road Intersection LOS To determine Phase 1 background traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with 2019 background traffic and the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements. Traffic analysis reports are included in Appendix G. Tables 7 and 8 on pages 17 and 18 summarize the intersection performance measures with the 2019 background traffic. With 2019 background traffic, all study area intersections are expected to continue to operate at LOS C or better with v/c ratio of 0.76 or less for all lane groups, with the exception of the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. It is projected to operate at LOS F with v/c ratio of 0.40 on the eastbound approach during the AM peak hour. ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 16 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Table 7. Intersection MOEs - 2019 (Build -out) background traffic GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 17 AM(PM) Peak Volumes, Control and AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Channelization MOE Hour Hour LOS B A (NB Dela s 10 10 Victory Road - 28(94) I and �i- NB Kentucky Way 169(76) -ntersection 6(231 1 rm v/c Max Lane 0.15 (NB) 0.09 (NB) Group v/c LOS C C - 1 105(169) VictoryRoad _" 1 _ "1 3a(1 s � Delay (s) 22 23 and Meridian Road 4456 Li _ 11_ J _ Intersection 0.77 0.79 2222 22 22 i v/c �< Max Lane 0.76 (NBR) 0.75 (WBR) Group v/c e LOS D/C F/B (EB/WB) Harris Street _er 00301 Delay (s) 28/21 53/12 and - 11 -bit 2(2) (EBiWB) Intersection 6142 (� _ „_ °3(°6) Meridian Road 1 - v/c Z�� Max Lane 0.34 (EB) 0.40 (EB) Group v/c ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 17 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Table 8. Lane group vlc ratios - 2019 (Build -out) background traffic GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LT THRU RT LT THRU RT Victory Road and Kentucky Way NB 0.15 0.09 SB EB WB 0.02 0.06 Victory Road and Meridian Road NB 0.04 0.74 0.76 0.13 0.35 0.36 SB 0.60 0.19 0.02 0.29 0.67 0.07 EB 0.20 0.75 0.30 0.47 WB 0.24 0.20 0.59 0.59 0.56 0.75 Harris Street and Meridian Road NB < 0.01 - 0.02 - SB 0.08 0.05 EB 0.34 0.40 WB 0.18 0.06 2019 (Build -Out) Background Traffic Mitigation No roadway or intersection improvements beyond those identified for the preceding mitigation are needed to mitigate the 2019 background traffic, except for the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. The eastbound approach on Harris Street is projected to require a second lane with 2019 background traffic based on NCHRP 457 guidelines - see Appendix D for the minor approach lane warrant worksheet. With the 2019 background traffic, the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection is not expected to meet warrants for a traffic signal because the traffic volumes on Harris Street are below the warrants' minimum traffic volume requirements - see Appendix H for signal warrant worksheet. No roadway or intersection improvements beyond those identified for preceding mitigation are recommended to mitigate the 2019 site plus background traffic. However, the intersection should be monitored for operational and safety issues as the developments build out and signal warrants re-evaluated with actual traffic counts. aSIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 18 LIFF SION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCMERIDIBDIVIAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO Analysis of 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic Conditions Trip Generation The number of trips generated by build -out of the Graycliff Subdivision was estimated using the procedures from the 9th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 9 presents a summary of the build -out trip generation. With the proposed land use, the development is projected to generate approximately 1,133 trips per day, 89 trips during the AM peak hour, and 119 trips during the PM peak hour. Table 9. 2019 (Build -out) trip generation summary Trip Capture Based on the development size and land use, Graycliff Subdivision is not expected to capture a significant amount of trips internally within the site. No trip reduction for internal capture trips was assumed in the traffic impact analysis. Pass -By Trips Graycliff Subdivision contains only residential land use and is not expected to attract pass -by trips. Diverted Trips Graycliff Subdivision contains only residential land use and is not expected to attract diverted trips. Trip Distribution and Assignment Site traffic was distributed and assigned to the external roadway system based on the existing travel patterns, site layout and the general location of the site within the area. Figure 5 on page 20 shows site traffic distribution patterns. These estimated patterns are approximately 70 percent of the site traffic with origins/destinations north of the development, 5 percent south, 15 percent west and 10 percent east. Site traffic was assigned to the roadway system, assuming all proposed internal roadways and connections are constructed. Figure 6 on page 21 summarizes the estimated site traffic generated by the development. Site Plus Background Traffic Build -out site traffic was added to the 2019 background to obtain the 2019 site plus background traffic summarized by Figure 7 on page 22. SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 19 Total ITE Trip Rate Total Land Use Category Code Size Period per Unit Trips Entering Exiting Weekday Daily(vpd) 9.52 1,133 50% 566 50% 566 Single -Family Detached Housing 210 119 DU Weekday AM Peak Hour (vph) 0.75 89 25% 23 75% 67 Weekday PM Peak Hour (vph) 1.00 119 63°% 75 37% 44 Trip Capture Based on the development size and land use, Graycliff Subdivision is not expected to capture a significant amount of trips internally within the site. No trip reduction for internal capture trips was assumed in the traffic impact analysis. Pass -By Trips Graycliff Subdivision contains only residential land use and is not expected to attract pass -by trips. Diverted Trips Graycliff Subdivision contains only residential land use and is not expected to attract diverted trips. Trip Distribution and Assignment Site traffic was distributed and assigned to the external roadway system based on the existing travel patterns, site layout and the general location of the site within the area. Figure 5 on page 20 shows site traffic distribution patterns. These estimated patterns are approximately 70 percent of the site traffic with origins/destinations north of the development, 5 percent south, 15 percent west and 10 percent east. Site traffic was assigned to the roadway system, assuming all proposed internal roadways and connections are constructed. Figure 6 on page 21 summarizes the estimated site traffic generated by the development. Site Plus Background Traffic Build -out site traffic was added to the 2019 background to obtain the 2019 site plus background traffic summarized by Figure 7 on page 22. SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 19 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 0 0 0 O N VICTORY ROAD En C J/ HARRIS STREET b1&L z1 a RUMPLE LANE L 0 0 O z FLEGEND: FX w � PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR STREET Figure 5. Site traffic distribution ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY4, 2075 PAGE 20 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY °a o=o LEGEND: o�IIo �00 O MINOR ARTERIAL m 2(2) VICTORY ROAD p XX(XX) AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) a 00 00) X,XXX AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (VPD) ❑ 0 0 L NTS ❑ CHANNELIZATION O r- GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 400; _• 1}� 3�2) 1 eoo GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION o=o LEGEND: o�IIo �00 0`--0�0� MINOR ARTERIAL m 2(2) VICTORY ROAD p XX(XX) AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) 00 00) X,XXX AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (VPD) e 0 0 L one CHANNELIZATION 0 0 ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL i 010 HARRIS STREETL =`=T_:�-�17- .�F 0101 RUMPLE LANE 400; _• 1}� 3�2) 1 eoo GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION LEGEND: — PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL — COLLECTOR STREET p XX(XX) AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) 0 0 X,XXX AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (VPD) } CHANNELIZATION ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL i STOP SIGN 0 STUDY INTERSECTION Figure 6. 2019 (Build -out) site traffic SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 21 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 169(76) 9134) HARRIS RAYCLIFF BDIVISION 4 GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO NTS b N d�N 41(1(49' ) • j 36 0) VICTORY ROAD 44 56 L L 36 73 2222 I O mCN 0 O Q f m�P V' - RUMPLE LANE Figure 7. 2019 (Build -out) site plus background traffic ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 22 NNN moo m LEGEND: 0 — PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL — MINOR ARTERIAL — COLLECTOR STREET XX(XX) AM(PM) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) XAXX AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (VPD) + CHANNELIZATION 100 TRAFFIC SIGNAL • STOP SIGN 0 STUDY INTERSECTION Figure 7. 2019 (Build -out) site plus background traffic ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 22 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Level of Service GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Roadway Segment LOS Table 10 summarizes the LOS for roadway segments in the study area for the expected 2019 site plus background peak hour traffic conditions. With the existing lane configurations and 2019 site plus background traffic, all study area roadway segments are below ACHD's threshold traffic volumes. Table 10. Roadway segment LOS — 2019 (Build -out) site plus background traffic Intersection LOS To determine build -out traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with 2019 site plus background traffic and the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements. Traffic analysis reports are included in Appendix I. Table 11 and Table 12 on pages 24 and 25 summarize the intersection performance measures with the 2019 site plus background traffic. With 2019 site plus background traffic, all study area intersections are expected to continue to operate at LOS C or better with v/c ratio of 0.78 or less for all lane groups, with the exception of the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. The eastbound left turn is expected to operate at LOS F with v/c ratio of 0.68 during the PM peak hour. ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 23 Threshold AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. of Volume (vph) Major Direction Major Direction Functional Through Left -Turn LOS LOS Volume Volume Roadway Segment Class Lanes Treatment D E (vph) LOS (vph) LOS Victory Road Kentucky Way Minor 1 No LT Lane 550 690 257 < D 331 < D to Meridian Road Arterial Kentucky Way Victory Road Collector 1 No LT Lane 425 525 123 < D 135 < D to Harris Street Harris Street West of Collector 1 No LT Lane 425 525 119 < D 121 < D Meridian Road Intersection LOS To determine build -out traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with 2019 site plus background traffic and the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements. Traffic analysis reports are included in Appendix I. Table 11 and Table 12 on pages 24 and 25 summarize the intersection performance measures with the 2019 site plus background traffic. With 2019 site plus background traffic, all study area intersections are expected to continue to operate at LOS C or better with v/c ratio of 0.78 or less for all lane groups, with the exception of the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. The eastbound left turn is expected to operate at LOS F with v/c ratio of 0.68 during the PM peak hour. ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 23 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCME SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Table 11. Intersection MOEs - 2019 (Build -out) site plus background traffic 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic Mitigation All study area roadway segments and intersections are expected meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds, except for the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. The left -turn from the eastbound approach is expected to operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour With 2019 site plus background traffic, the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection is not expected to meet warrants for a traffic signal because the traffic volumes on Harris Street are below the warrants' minimum traffic volume requirements. Signal warrant worksheets are included in Appendix G. No roadway or intersection improvements beyond those identified for preceding mitigation are recommended to mitigate the 2019 background traffic. However, the intersection should be monitored for operational and safety issues as developments build out and signal warrants re-evaluated with actual traffic counts. aSIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 24 AM(PM) Peak Volumes, Control and AM Peak PM Peak Intersection Channelization MOE Hour Hour LOS B B (NB) Delay (s) 11 10 VictoryRoad 37(230 and V MIMI NB Intersection Kentucky Way ,69(76 9(34 0 1• v/c Max Lane 0.17 (NB) 0.11 (NB) Group v/c = LOS C C Delay (s) 23 23 Victory Road IN ab11 e) and _ ��1 Intersection 0.78 0.81 Meridian Road 44 s6 367 3) - u_ 2z2z r.;m v/c Max Lane 0.78 (NBR) 0.75 (WBR) Group v/c $-EBMB LOS E/C FIB Delay (s) 42/21 88/12 Harris Street "ems �_ 41�4o1 and " ' % z 2 EB WB) Intersection 108730 1 — (!— Meridian Road „(8f , az- v/c - Max Lane GroupLane (EBL) 0.68 (EBL) 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic Mitigation All study area roadway segments and intersections are expected meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds, except for the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. The left -turn from the eastbound approach is expected to operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour With 2019 site plus background traffic, the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection is not expected to meet warrants for a traffic signal because the traffic volumes on Harris Street are below the warrants' minimum traffic volume requirements. Signal warrant worksheets are included in Appendix G. No roadway or intersection improvements beyond those identified for preceding mitigation are recommended to mitigate the 2019 background traffic. However, the intersection should be monitored for operational and safety issues as developments build out and signal warrants re-evaluated with actual traffic counts. aSIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 24 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCME SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Table 12. Lane group vlc ratios - 2019 (Build -out) site plus background traffic Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LT THRU RT LT THRU RT Victory Road and Kentucky Way NB 0.17 0.11 SB EB WB 0.02 0.07 Victory Road and Meridian Road NB 0.04 0.76 0.78 0.14 0.37 0.37 SB 0.63 0.20 0.02 0.30 0.69 0.07 EB 0.20 0.75 0.30 0.47 WB 0.25 0.20 0.59 0.62 0.56 0.75 Harris Street and Meridian Road NB < 0.01 - 0.03 - SB 0.08 - 0.05 - EB 0.57 0.02 0.68 0.02 WB 0.18 0.06 Site Circulation The proposed Biltmore Estates Subdivision located north of the site plans to extend Kentucky Way from the existing Kentucky Ridge Subdivision connecting to Harris Street. Based on the preliminary site plan, Graycliff Subdivision plans to construct a collector street connecting to Harris Street to provide access to Victory Road and Meridian Road. The proposed Harris Street and Kentucky Way intersection is expected to operate at LOS A with v/c ratio of 0.01 or less for all lane groups with 2019 site plus background traffic. Traffic analysis reports are included in Appendix H. With 2019 site plus background traffic, Kentucky Way is projected to carry approximately 2,130 vpd at Victory Road, which is within the ADT threshold of 5,000 vpd on existing collector streets in residential area with front -on housing as required by Section 7206.3.7 of the ACHD Policy Manual. The maximum ADT allowed on new collector streets in residential areas with front -on housing is 3,000 vpd. All internal local streets are projected to carry less than the 2,000 vpd threshold on local streets as defined by Section 7207.1 and Section 7207.3 of the ACHD Policy Manual. ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAYO, 2015 PAGE 25 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCME SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Summary of Results The study's key findings are summarized below. Existing Traffic Conditions 1. For the existing traffic conditions analyzed with the existing roadway lane configurations, all study area roadways meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds. As a result, no roadway improvements are needed to mitigate existing traffic. 2. For the existing traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, all study area intersections meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds. One intersection is expected to meet turn lane warrants based on ITD guidelines: Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. The following intersection improvements are needed to mitigate existing traffic at the Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection: • Right -turn lane on southbound approach 2019 (Build -out) Background Traffic Conditions 3. The 2019 roadway network in the study area remains the same as existing with the exception of the southbound right -turn lane improvement at the intersection of Harris Street and Meridian Road needed to mitigate preceding traffic. There are no planned improvements for the other study roadways and intersections in the ACHD's current FYWP or in the ITIP. 4. For the 2019 background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing roadway lane configurations, all study area roadways meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds. As a result; no roadway improvements are needed to mitigate the 2019 background traffic. 5. For the 2019 background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations or with the preceding mitigation improvements, one study area intersection is expected to exceed ACHD's minimum operational threshold: Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. • The Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection is not expected to meet warrants for a traffic signal with 2019 background traffic. • A second lane on the eastbound approach to provide an exclusive left -turn lane is required based on NCHRP 457 guidelines to mitigate 2019 background traffic. 2019 (Build -Out) Site Plus Background Traffic Conditions 6. Graycliff Subdivision plans to construct the following land use by build -out year 2019: • 119 single-family dwelling units 7. The development is expected to generate approximately 1,133 trips per day, 89 trips during the AM peak hour, and 119 trips during the PM peak hour by year 2019. aSIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 26 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 8. Site traffic is anticipated to have the following general distribution patterns: • 70 percent having origins/destinations north of the development • 5 percent having origins/destinations south of the development • 15 percent having origins/destinations west of the development • 10 percent having origins/destinations east of the development GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 9. For the 2019 site plus background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing roadway lane configurations, all study area roadways meet ACHD's minimum operational thresholds. As a result, no roadway improvements are needed to mitigate the 2019 site plus background traffic. 10. For the 2019 site plus background traffic conditions analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configurations, or with the preceding mitigation improvements, one study area intersection is expected to exceed ACHD's minimum operational thresholds: Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection. • The Harris Street and Meridian Road intersection is not expected to meet warrants for a traffic signal with 2019 site plus background traffic. • The critical eastbound left -turn movement is expected to operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour. 11. The maximum expected traffic volumes on Kentucky Way is approximately 2,130 vpd, which is within the ADT threshold of 5,000 vpd on existing collector streets in residential area with front -on housing as defined by Section 7206.3.7 of the ACHD Policy Manual. The maximum ADT allowed on new collector streets in residential areas with front -on housing is 3,000 vpd. 12. All internal local streets are projected to carry less than the 2,000 vpd threshold on local streets as defined by Section 7207.1 and Section 7207.3 of the ACHD Policy Manual. ® SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 27 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Appendix A: Existing Traffic Counts GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO aSIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE A Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Kentucky Way / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Groups Printed- General Traffic File Name : Victory Kentucky AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No : 1 F �o r� North 42 N ~ < m ttcN �c o 1/22/20 M �x m _ 01 1/2224 08:45 AM o a nv General Traffic .a O o mo Left RI ht Pods 10 61 1 5 72 87 Out In Total Victory Road Kentucky Way Victory Road From East From South From West Start Time Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Ri ht Thru Peds I App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 8 0 0 8 5 0 0 5 1 18 0 19 32 07:15 AM 4 1 0 5 10 0 0 10 0 13 0 13 28 07:30 AM 9 2 0 11 12 3 0 15 0 26 0 26 52 07:45 AM 6 4 0 10 9 4 1 14 1 68 0 69 93 Total 27 7 0 34 36 7 1 44 2 125 0 127 205 08:00 AM 7 2 0 9 4 0 0 4 0 22 0 22 35 08:15 AM 5 2 0 7 7 1 0 8 0 19 0 19 34 08:30 AM 6 0 0 6 7 1 0 8 0 24 0 24 38 08:45 AM 10 0 0 10 7 1 0 8 2 14 0 16 34 Total 28 4 0 321 25 3 0 28 2 79 0 81 1 141 Grand Total 1 55 11 066 61 10 1 72 4 204 0 208 346 Apprch % 83.3 16.7 0 84.7 13.9 1.4 1.9 98.1 0 Total % 15.9 3.2 0 19.1 17.6 2.9 0.3 20.8 1.2 59 0 60.1 F �o r� North 42 N ~ < m ttcN �c o 1/22/20 M �x m _ 01 1/2224 08:45 AM o a nv General Traffic .a O o mo Left RI ht Pods 10 61 1 5 72 87 Out In Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Kentucky Way / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Victory Kentucky AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Victory Road From East Kentucky Way From South Victory Road From West Start Time Thru I Left I Peds Aon. Total Right Left I Peds I App. Total I Right I Thru IPeds Aoo. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 9 2 0 11 12 3 015 0 26 0 26 07:45 AM 6 4 0 10 9 4 1 14 1 68 0 69 08:00 AM 7 2 0 9 4 0 0 4 0 22 0 22 08:15 AM 5 2 0 7 7 1 0 8 0 19 0 19 Total Volume 1 27 10 0 371 32 8 1 41 1 1 135 0 136 Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 07:30A General Traffic 4-1 F+ Left M Peds 1 81 321 11 41 F 52 Out In Total Kcnhjr v Wav Int. Total 52 93 35 34 214 L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Kentucky Way / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Victory Kentucky AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Victory Road From East Kentucky Way From South Victory Road From West Start Time I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total I Right I Left I Peds I App. Total I Right I Thru I Peds I A= Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:30 AM 07:00 AM 07:30 AM +0 mins: 9 2 0 11 5 0 0 5 0 26 0 26 +15 mins. 6 4 0 10 10 0 0 10 1 68 0 69 +30 mins. 7 2 0 9 12 3 0 15 0 22 0 22 +45 mins. 5 2 0 7 9 4 1 14 0 19 0 19 Total Volume 27 10 0 37 36 7 1 44 1 135 0 136 % App.Total 73 27 0 81.8 15.9 2.3 0.7 99.3 0 PHF .750 .625 .000 .841 .750 .438 .250 .733 .250 .496 .000 .493 Peak Hour Data T North n c o i f � General Traffic a a n o 3 F+ Left T61 h 7 1n - Peak Hour: 1100 AM Int. Total Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Kentucky Way / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Groups Printed- General Traffic File Name : Victory Kentucky PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/21/2014 Page No : 1 m o< * �o ~ P 1m me F� Norah �2 < r O >. 1/21/2014 04;00 PM w —" 1/21/201405'45 PM 0 N x m° g+ty m General Tragic a O a yo au m— Left Ri ht Peds 2 4 1 78 50 128 Out In Total Victory Road Kentucky Way Victory Road From East From South From West Start Time Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Left Peds App. Total Ri ht Thru Peds A .Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 29 8 0 37 7 1 0 8 1 14 0 15 60 04:15 PM 42 10 0 52 2 0 0 2 1 9 0 10 64 04:30 PM 29 11 0 40 7 0 0 7 2 10 0 12 59 04:45 PM 36 13 0 49 6 1 1 8 0 18 0 18 75 Total 136 42 0 178 22 2 1 25 4 51 0 55 258 05:00 PM 46 8 0 54 7 0 0 7 1 97 0 18 79 05:15 PM 52 4 0 56 6 0 0 6 2 15 0 17 79 05:30 PM 49 12 0 61 4 0 0 4 1 9 0 10 75 05:45 PM 39 4 0 43 8 0 0 8 0 17 0 17 68 Total 186 28 0 2141 25 0 0 251 4 58 0 62 1 301 Grand Total 322 70 0 392 47 21 50 8 109 0 117 559 Apprch % 82.1 17.9 0 94 4 2 6.8 93.2 0 Total % 57.6 12.5 0 70.1 8.4 0.4 0.2 8.9 1.4 19.5 0 20.9 m o< * �o ~ P 1m me F� Norah �2 < r O >. 1/21/2014 04;00 PM w —" 1/21/201405'45 PM 0 N x m° g+ty m General Tragic a O a yo au m— Left Ri ht Peds 2 4 1 78 50 128 Out In Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Kentucky Way /Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Victory Kentucky PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/21/2014 Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 36 13 0 49 6 05:00 PM 46 8 0 54 7 05:15 PM 52 4 0 56 6 1 1 6 0 18 0 18 0 0 7 1 17 0 18 0 0 6 2 15 0 17 Peak Hour Data w� T'. N O � € — North Begins at 04:45 P 5'z Peak Hour Be 9 0 y General Traffic � o n o p� Lft RI ht Peds 1 23 1- 41 25 66 Out In Total KsnfijrW Way Int. Total 75 79 79 Victory Road From East Kentucky Way From South Victory Road From West Start Time I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total I Right I Left I Peds I App. Total I Right I Thru I Peds I App. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 36 13 0 49 6 05:00 PM 46 8 0 54 7 05:15 PM 52 4 0 56 6 1 1 6 0 18 0 18 0 0 7 1 17 0 18 0 0 6 2 15 0 17 Peak Hour Data w� T'. N O � € — North Begins at 04:45 P 5'z Peak Hour Be 9 0 y General Traffic � o n o p� Lft RI ht Peds 1 23 1- 41 25 66 Out In Total KsnfijrW Way Int. Total 75 79 79 L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study* SIX0012 Intersection: Kentucky Way / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Victory Kentucky PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/21/2014 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 reaK nool Tor CBon Victory Road From East Kentucky Way From South Victory Road From West Start Time I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total I Right Left Peds App. Total I Right I Thru I Peds I App. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 reaK nool Tor CBon mporoam be Ins au 04:45 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM +0 mins. 36 13 0 49 7 0 0 7 2 10 0 12 +15 mins. 46 8 0 54 6 1 1 8 0 18 0 18 +30 mins. 52 4 0 56 7 0 0 7 1 17 0 18 +45 mins. 49 12 0 61 6 0 0 6 2 15 0 17 Total Volume 183 37 0 220 26 1 1 28 5 60 0 65 %A91). Total 83.2 16.8 0 92.9 3.6 3.6 7.7 92.3 0 PHF .880 .712 .000 .902 .929 .250 .250 .875 .625 .833 .000 .903 Peak Hour Data a ' v <� North 0 .5._ tont xo I General Traffic = m o = A J is a � Lelfl Pl ht Peds 11 261 11 28 In - Peak Hour: 04:30 PM Int. Total Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Signalized L2 Data Collection www.L2DataGoilection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Groups Printed- General Traffic File Name : Meridian Victory AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No : 1 Meridian Road Victory Road Out In Total Meridian Road 2419 803 3222 Victory Road 101 6201 1651 0 From North From East From South From West Start Time Ri ht Thru Left Peds q ,roar Ri ht Thru Left I Peds 1 4, n.i Right I ThN FLeftT Peds qW. rami Right I Thru I Left I Peds I q ..Totj Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 68 9 0 77 22 8 9 0 39 22 297 0 0 319 0 12 3 0 15 450 07:15 AM 1 102 17 0 120 18 3 6 0 27 40 323 2 0 365 1 14 2 0 17 529 07:30 AM 1 93 18 0 112 28 9 8 0 45 30 345 4 0 379 5 16 3 0 24 560 07:45 AM 5 85 30 0 120 30 8 3 0 41 30 272 8 0 310 6 56 9 0 71 542 Total 7 348 74 0 429 98 28 26 0 152 122 1237 14 0 1373 12 98 17 0 127 2081 08:00 AM 3 69 35 0 107 17 10 11 0 38 33 273 4 0 310 4 17 2 0 23 478 0815 AM 3 71 22 0 96 29 3 4 0 36 24 264 5 0 293 4 20 7 0 31 456 08:30 AM 3 58 20 0 81 32 9 3 0 44 16 210 2 0 228 6 16 6 0 28 381 08:45 AM 2 74 14 0 90 25 10 14 1 50 13 196 1 0 210 7 10 6 0 23 373 Total 11 272 91 0 374 1 103 32 32 1 1681 86 943 12 0 1041 21 63 21 0 105 1 1688 Grand Total 18 620 165 0 803 201 60 58 1 320 208 2180 26 0 2414 33 161 38 0 232 3769 Apprch % 2.2 77.2 20.5 0 62.8 18.8 18.1 0.3 8.6 90.3 1.1 0 14.2 69.4 16.4 0 Total % 0.5 16.4 4.4 0 21.3 5.3 1.6 1.5 0 8.5 5.5 57.8 0.7 0 64 0.9 4.3 1 0 6.2 Meridian Road Out In Total 2419 803 3222 101 6201 1651 0 Righl Thr. LPft Peds a 2 North a <, o Z 1/22/2014 07:00 AM 0 n P 1/22/2014 08:45 AM m o "o General Iraffic �n D A F+ Left Thru Ri hl Peds 26 2180 OB 711 2414 3 25 Out In Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd /Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Signalized File Name : Meridian Victory AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Beains at 07:15 AM Int. Total 07:15 AM Meridian Road From North Victory Road From East Meridian RoadVictory From South Road From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I a .Tow Ri ht Thru Left Peds mw Right I Thru I Left I Peds App Totw Ri ht Thru I Left I Peds I n mw Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Beains at 07:15 AM Int. Total 07:15 AM 1 102 17 -0 120 18 3 6 0 27 40 323 2 0 365 1 1 14 2 0 17529 07:30 AM 1 93 18 0 112 28 9 8 0 45 1 30 345 4 0 379 5 16 3 0 24 560 07:45 AM 5 85 30 0 120 30 8 3 0 41 30 272 6 0 310 6 56 9 0 71 542 08:00 AM 3 69 35 0 107 17 10 11 0 38 33 273 4 0 310 4 17 2 0 23 478 Total Volume 10 349 100 0 459 93 30 280 151 133 1213 18 0 1364 16 103 16 0 135 2109 %App. Total 22 76 21.8 D 61.6 19.9 18.5 0 9.8 88.9 1.3 0 11.9 76.3 11.9 0 PHF .500 .855 .714 .000 .956 1 .775 .750 .636 .000 .839 .831 .879 .563 .000 .900 .687 .460 .444 .000 .475 1 .942 Meddlon Road Out In Total 1322 459 1781 4101 3491 1001 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data P°m Fo � %J m � A � �O Fol o Nodh K c ��-2- Peak Hour Begins at 07:15A 0Peak General Traffic 0 �h 1n 4-1rF+ Lek Thru RI ht Peds 18 1213 133 0 393 1364 1757 Out In Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Signalized File Name : Meridian Victory AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Anoroach Begins at: Meridian Road From North Victory Road From East Meridian Road From South Victory Road From West Start Time Ri htI Thru I Left I Peds I AM .Treat Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A, rotai Right I Thou I Left I Peds I App .Total Right I Theo I Left I Peds I A,,Tomj Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Anoroach Begins at: nL Total 07 15 Wee AM OY00 AM 07:45AM +0 mins. 1 102 17 0 120 17 10 11 0 38 22 297 0 0 319 fi 56 9 0 71 +15 mins. 1 93 18 0 112 29 3 4 0 36 40 323 2 0 365 4 17 2 0 23 +30 mins. 5 85 30 0 120 32 9 3 0 44 30 345 4 0 379 4 20 7 0 31 +45 mins. 3 69 35 0 107 25 10 14 1 50 30 272 8 0 310 6 16 6 0 28 Total Volume 1 10 349 100 0 459 103 32 32 1 168 122 1237 14 0 1373 20 109 24 0 153 App. Total 2.2 76 21.8 0 61.3 19 19 0.6 8.9 90.1 1 0 13.1 71.2 15.7 0 PHF .500 .855 .714 .000 .956 .805 .800 .571 .250 .840 .763 .896 .438 .000 .906 .833 .487 .667 .000 .539 nL Total Meridian Road In - Peak Hour: 07:15 AM 459 — 0 00 0 ht ru Left Peds RigThou Peak Hour Data mo � North m Q General Traffic m UY NLS r w0 > E Left Thru Ri It Ped 14 12371 122 0 373- In- Peak Hour: 07:00 AM nL Total Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Signalized L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Groups Printed- General Traffic File Name : Meridian Victory PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/21/2014 Page No : 1 Meridian Road Victory Road Out In Total Meridian Road 1443 2508 3951 Victory Road 541 22431 2101 1 From North From East From South From West 0 I Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds Aq,.Tonl Ri ht Thru Left I Peds I All mni Right I Thru Left Feeds ew-Tota Right Thru Left I Peds aoa. rens Int.Total 04:00 PM 6 221 26 0 253 22 25 23 0 70 15 174 10 0 199 1 13 7 0 21 543 04:15 PM 9 300 27 0 336 39 29 27 0 95 18 165 7 0 190 1 9 6 0 16 637 04:30 PM 5 294 24 0 323 28 23 25 0 76 18 152 7 0 177 3 9 4 1 17 593 04:45 PM 10 288 29 1 328 40 20 32 0 92 12 124 5 0 141 3 14 12 0 29 590 Total 30 1103 106 1 1240 129. 97 107 0 333 63 615 29 0 707 8 45 29 1 83 2363 05:00 PM 9 276 30 0 315 36 32 37 0 105 14 123 3 0 140 3 12 8 0 23 583 05:15 PM 4 316 22 0 342 45 35 32 0 112 12 135 4 0 151 9 19 9 0 37 642 05:30 PM 7 285 24 0 316 28 41 26 0 95 16 124 3 0 143 5 5 3 0 13 567 05:45 PM 4 263 28 0 295 44 33 32 0 109 11 110 4 0 125 5 20 5 0 30 559 Total 24 1140 104 0 1268 1 153 141 127 0 421 53 492 14 0 559 1 22 56 25 0 1031 2351 Grand Total 54 2243 210 1 2508 282 238 234 0 754 116 1107 43 0 1266 30 101 54 1 186 4714 Apprch % 2.2 89.4 8.4 0 37.4 31.6 31 0 9.2 87.4 3.4 0 16.1 54.3 29 0.5 Total % 1.1 47.6 4.5 0 53.2 6 5 5 0 16 2.5 23.5 0.9 0 26.9 0.6 2.1 1.1 0 3.9 Meridian Road Out In Total 1443 2508 3951 541 22431 2101 1 Right Thru Left Peds 0 I N 0 N Z; 2 North J < . f �3mc , o tt c 1/21/2014 04:00 PM Sr oN 12/20405: 45 PM m N o 0 u' �a General Traffic n w`o 4-] F+ Left Thru Right Peds 3 6 2507126fi 3773 Out In Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Signalized File Name : Meridian Victory PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/21/2014 Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Beoins at 04:30 PM m1. Total 04:30 PM Meridian Road From North Victory Road From East Meridian Road From South Victory Road From West Start Time Ri ht Tom I Left I Peds I A Tma Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A .Tal Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App .Teta Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A -Tai Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Beoins at 04:30 PM m1. Total 04:30 PM 5 294 24 0 323 28 23 25 0 76 18 152 7 0 177 3 9 4 1 17593 04:45 PM 10 288 29 1 328 40 20 32 0 92 12 124 5 0 141 3 14 12 0 29 590 05:00 PM 9 276 30 0 315 36 32 37 0 105 14 123 3 0 140 3 12 8 0 23 583 05:15 PM 4 316 22 0 342 45 35 32 0 112 12 135 4 0 151 9 19 9 0 37 642 Total Volume 28 1174 105 1 1308 149 110 126 0 385 56 534 19 0 609 18 54 33 1 106 2408 % App.Total 2.1 89.8 8 0.1 38.7 28.6 32.7 0 9.2 87.7 3.1 0 17 50.9 31.1 0.9 PHF .700 .929 .875 .250 .956 1 .828 .786 .851 .000 .859 .778 .878 .679 .000 .860 .500 .711 .688 .250 .716 .938 Meridian Road Out In Total 716 1308 2024 281 11741 1051 1 Right Left Peds In 4 Peak Hour Data 9� uO a n 2� North �° r` 4 20 0 co Z— Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P m5Q o rn p General TraKc r� m 0 n O �9 a om �o a o— LeftThru Rl ht Peds 19 534 56 0 1318 609 1927 Out In Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Victory Rd City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Signalized File Name : Meridian Victory PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/21/2014 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: Meridian Road From North Victory Road From East Meridian Road From South Victory Road From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I An, .Total Right I Thru I Left I Peds I AM .Taal Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App Tltai Right I ThN Left Peds rwal Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: nt Total 0430 PM Meridian Road 05:00 PM In - Peak Hour: 04:30 PM 04:00 PM F -T3-581 04:30 PM 28 - 74 105 4 +0 mins. 5 294 24 0 323 36 32 37 0 105 15 174 10 0 199 3 9 4 1 17 +15 mins. 10 288 29 1 328 45 35 32 0 112 18 165 7 0 190 3 14 12 0 29 +30 mins. 9 276 30 0 315 28 41 26 0 95 18 152 7 0 177 3 12 8 0 23 +45 mins. 4 316 22 0 342 44 33 32 0 109 12 124 5 0 141 9 19 9 0 37 Total Volume 28 1174 105 1 1308 153 141 127 0 421 63 615 29 0 707 18 54 33 1 106 % App. Total 2.1 89.8 8 0.1 36.3 33.5 30.2 0 8.9 87 4.1 0 17 50.9 31.1 0.9 PHF .700 .929 .875 .250 .956 .850 .860 .858 .000 .940 .875 .884 .725 .000 .888 .500 .711 .688 .250 .716 nt Total Meridian Road In - Peak Hour: 04:30 PM F -T3-581 28 - 74 105 4 Rip ht Thru LeR Peds Peak Hour Data a i u North2 4-2� n o r_R x o i General Traffic o r o 0 m v m o T l+ Left Thru It ht Pegs 29 615 63 0 707 In - Peak Hour. 04:00 PM nt Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Harris St City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Meridian Harris AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No : 1 Harris Street 0 4 0 5 372 0 4 0 5 488 0 5 0 6 474 0 4 0 5 375 0 17 0 21 1 1709 0 4 0 6 354 0 2 0 3 367 0 0 0 2288 0 3 0 5 303 0 9 0 16 1312 0 26 0 37 3021 0 70.3 0 0 0.9 0 1.2 Meridian Road Rumple Lane Out I To al 2302 698 3000 Meridian Road From North From East 3 fi95 0 0 From South hart Time Right Thru I Left I Peds I All Tew Right Thru Left Peds 4p,Tot,i Right Thru. Left I Peds I North Right 07:00 AM 1 76 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 0 0 290 1 07:15 AM 0 108 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 375 0 0 375 1 07:30 AM 0 104 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 364 0 0 364 1 07:45 AM 0 90 0 0 90 1 0 0 0 1 1 278 0 0 279 1 Total 1 378 0 0 379 1 0 0 0 1 1 1307 0 0 1308 4 08:00 AM 0 81 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 267 0 0 267 2 08:15 AM 1 76 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 287 0 0 287 1 08:30 AM 0 63 0 0 63 0 0 1 0 1 2 218 2 0 222 2 08:45 AM 1 97 0 0 98 0 0 2 0 2 2 196 0 0 198 2 Total 1 2 317 0 0 3191 0 0 3 0 3 1 4 968 2 0 9741 7 Grand Total 1 3 695 0 0 698 1 0 3 0 4 5 2275 2 0 2282 11 Apprch % 0.4 99.6 0 0 25 0 75 0 0.2 99.7 0.1 0 29.7 Total % 1 0.1 23 0 0 23.1 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 75.3 0.1 0 75.5 0.4 File Name : Meridian Harris AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No : 1 Harris Street 0 4 0 5 372 0 4 0 5 488 0 5 0 6 474 0 4 0 5 375 0 17 0 21 1 1709 0 4 0 6 354 0 2 0 3 367 0 0 0 2288 0 3 0 5 303 0 9 0 16 1312 0 26 0 37 3021 0 70.3 0 0 0.9 0 1.2 Meridian Road Out I To al 2302 698 3000 3 fi95 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds 7'u North b n H 2 v y 1/22/2014 07:00 AM S m 1122/2014 08:45 AM r > w 0 o m General Traffic o rh Left Thru Right Peds 2 2276 s D 709 2282 2997 Out In Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Harris St City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Meridian Harris AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM Meridian Road From North Rumple Lane From East Meridian Road From South Harris Street From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I APP Tmai Right I Thru I Left I Peds At, .roma Right I Thru I Left 11 Peds A Tma Right I ThN I Left I Peds A .Tome Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 1 76 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 0 0 290 1 0 4 0 5 372 07:15 AM 0 108 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 375 0 0 375 1 0 4 0 5 488 07:30 AM 0 104 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 364 0 0 364 1 0 5 0 6 474 07:45 AM 0 90 0 0 90 1 0 0 0 1 1 278 0 0 279 1 0 4 0 5 375 Total volume 1 378 0 0 379 1 0 0 0 1 1 1307 0 0 1308 4 0 17 0 21 1709 % App. Total 0.3 99.7 0 0 100 0 0 0 0.1 99.9 0 0 19 0 81 0 PHF .250 .875 .000 .000 .877 .250 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .871 .000 .000 .872 1.00 .000 .850 .000 .875 1 .876 Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 30 0 38 1308 1 Out In Total Meridian Road Meridian Road Out In Total 1325 379 1704 E 11 3781 01 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data F J Q o North Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 A .General Traffic 0 ip O u no F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 30 0 38 1308 1 Out In Total Meridian Road L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Harris St City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Meridian Harris AM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/22/2014 Page No : 3 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM -Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: Meridian Road Rumple Lane From North I From East Meridian Road Harris Street I From South I From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I All .Tama 1 Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A .1 1 Right I Thru I Left I Peds I .Tora I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A rmai Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM -Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: L 13081 In - Peak Hour: 07:00 AM Mcndiao Rm, Int. Total 0 ;15 AM Meridian Road 08.00 m In - Peak Hour: 07:15 AM 07:00 AM 383 3831 al 0 07:15AM Right Thru Left Peds +0 mins. 0 108 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 0 0 290 1 0 4 0 5 +15 mins. 0 104 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 375 0 0 375 1 0 5 0 6 +30 mins. 0 90 0 0 90 0 0 1 0 1 0 364 0 0 364 1 0 4 0 5 +45 mins. 0 81 0 0 81 0 0 2 0 2 1 278 0 0 279 2 0 4 0 6 Total Volume 0 383 0 0 383 0 0 3 0 3 1 1307 0 0 1308 5 0 17 0 22 A. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 0.1 99.9 0 0 22.7 0 77.3 0 PHF .000 .887 .000 .000 .887 .000 .000 .375 ,000 .375 .250 .871 .000 .000 :872 .625 .000 .850 .000 .917 L 13081 In - Peak Hour: 07:00 AM Mcndiao Rm, Int. Total Meridian Road In - Peak Hour: 07:15 AM 383 3831 al 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data vs a T o North 4-2o m A ov y i ,� I General Traffic m r = sw mo'm xa tt� 0 oy m � E a N 0 �� gr,� L_eft Thht Peds ru I 1 0 1307 1 0 L 13081 In - Peak Hour: 07:00 AM Mcndiao Rm, Int. Total Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Harris St City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Grouos Printed- General Traffic File Name : Meridian Harris PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/21/2014 Page No : 1 Meridian Road Rumple Lane Meridian Road 1224 2415 F3639 Harris Street 3 2400 2 0 From North From East From South From West '6 o ry ^' StaRTime Right Thru Left Peds 4.Tori Ri ht Thru left Peds App Tori Right Thru Left Peds Ana Tari Right I Thru Left Peds AnITMM jntjtai 04:00 PM 0 236 1 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 3 0 197 2 0 3 0 5 439 04:15 PM 1 316 0 0 317 1 0 0 0 1 0 162 0 0 162 1 0 4 0 5 485 04:30 PM 4 303 0 0 307 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 0 0 172 1 0 3 0 4 483 04:45 PM 1 308 1 0 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 3 0 127 0 0 6 0 6 443 Total 6 1163 2 0 1171 1 0 0 0 1 0 652 6 0 658 4 0 16 0 20 1850 05:00 PM 2 309 0 0 311 1 0 0 0 1 0 146 0 0 146 1 0 2 0 3 461 05:15 PM 2 338 0 0 340 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 0 132 0 0 3 0 3 475 05:30 PM 1 308 0 0 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 0 0 144 0 0 0 0 0 453 05:45 PM 2 282 0 0 284 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 3 0 128 1 0 2 0 3 415 Total 1 7 1237 0 0 1244 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 547 3 0 550 1 2 0 7 0 9 1 1804 Grand Total 1 13 2400 2 0 2415 2 0 0 0 2 0 1199 9 0 1208 6 0 23 0 29 3654 Apprch % 0.5 99.4 0.1 0 100 0 0 0 0 99.3 0.7 0 20.7 0 79.3 0 Total % 1 0.4 65.7 0.1 0 66.1 0.1 0 0 0 0.1 0 32.8 0.2 0 33.1 0.2 0 0.6 0 0.8 Meridian Road Out In Total 1224 2415 F3639 3 2400 2 0 Right Thru Left Reds '6 o ry ^' r- 3 rJ �O 2�N No h " A 3 65— € mt PM �m 1�21/201404:00 21/201405:45 PM = � N m Ge eral Traffic � �S N a B mo AN C1 l -l' Left Thru Ri hl Petls Oi 2406 1208 3614 Out In Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Harris St City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Meridian Harris PM Site Code :00000000 Start Date : 1/21/2014 Page No :2 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire. Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM Meridian Road From North Rumple Lane From East Meridian Road From South Harris Street From West Start Time Ri htI Thru I Left I Peds I A %.1 1 Right I Thru I LR I Peds AOTmai Ri ht Thru I Left I Peds I A _Tma I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I Am To, Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire. Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 1 316 0 0 317 1 0 0 0 1 0 162 0 0 162 1 0 4 0 5 465 04:30 PM 4 303 0 0 307 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 0 0 172 1 0 3 0 4 483 04:45 PM 1 308 1 0 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 3 0 127 0 0 6 0 6 443 05:00 PM 2 309 0 0 311 1 0 0 0 1 0 146 0 0 146 1 0 2 0 3 461 Total Volume 8 1236 1 0 1245 2 0 0 0 2 0 604 3 0 607 3 0 15 0 18 1872 % App.Total 0.6 99.3 0.1 0 100 0 00 0 99.5 0.5 0 16.7 0 83.3 0 PHF .500 .978 .250 .000 .982 .500 .000 .000 .000 :500 .000 .878 .250 .000 .882 .750 .000 .625 .000 .750 1 .965 Meridian Road Out In Total 621 1245 7866 81 12361 11 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data F ` J * ro n� North A m 4-2 3 Peak Hour Begins a104:15 P E t m y General r v y v o v a 4-1 T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 3 604 0 0 239607 846 Out In Total L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801)413-2993 Study #: SIX0012 Intersection: Meridian Rd / Harris St City & State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Meridian Harris PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/21/2014 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Aooroach Beains at: Meridian Road From North Rumple Lane From East Meridian Road From South Harris Street From West Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A ,Tole) Ri ht Thm Left PedsI All rmM Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A .mei Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds rdmi Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Aooroach Beains at: Int. TaWI 0445 PM Meridian Road 04:15 PM In- Peak Hour. 04:45 PM 04:00 PM 1270 KOO PM F—=61 12631 11 0 +0 mins. 1 308 1 0 310 1 0 0 0 1 0 194 3 0 197 2 0 3 0 5 +15 mins. 2 309 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 0 0 162 1 0 4 0 5 +30 mins. 2 338 0 0 340 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 0 0 172 1 0 3 0 4 +45 mins. 1 308 0 0 309 1 0 0 0 1 0 124 3 0 127 0 0 6 0 6 Total Volume 6 1263 1 0 1270 2 0 0 0 2 0 652 6 0 658 4 0 16 0 20 % App. Total 0.5 99.4 0.1 0 100 0 0 0 0 99.1 0.9 0 20 0 80 0 PHF .750 .934 .250 .000 .934 .500 .000 .000 ,000 .500 .000 .840 .500 .000 .835 .500 .000 .667 .000 .833 Int. TaWI Meridian Road In- Peak Hour. 04:45 PM 1270 F—=61 12631 11 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data ♦ A J 0 .6 'r 0 �� North N ~20 m 8,` 23 m h x° General Traffic "'om is m 0 0 e a Ho F+ Left Thru Meet Peds 6 652 0 0 658 In- Pealk Hour. 04:110 PM M,rftfi,a Road Int. TaWI L2 Data Collection Study#: SIX0012 www.L2DataCollection.com Count: Volume / Direction Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Tech:Judd/ Type: Axle Hits 12 Victory W of Meridian VOL Victory Road west of Meridian Road Meridian, Idaho Start 21 -Jan -14 Time Tue WB EB Total 12:00 AM 12:15 12:30 12:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 02:15 02:30 02:45 03:00 03:15 03:30 03:45 04:00 04:15 0430 04:45 05:00 05:15 05:30 05:45 06:00 06:15 06:30 06:45 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 08:00 08:15 0830 08:45 09:00 09:15 09:30 09:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 Total 0 0 0 Peak Vol. P.H.F. Page 1 L2 Data Collection Study #: SIX0012 www.L2DataCollection.com Victory W of Meridian VOL Count: Volume / Direction Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Victory Road west of Meridian Road Tech: Judd / Meridian, Idaho Type: Axle Hits / 2 Start 21 -Jan -14 Total Time Tue WB EB 12:00 PM 15 24 39 12:15 16 13 29 12:30 12 12 24 12:45 24 24 48 01:00 18 22 40 01:15 20 16 36 01:30 20 14 34 01:45 24 14 38 02:00 23 16 39 02:15 19 18 37 02:30 30 24 54 0245 18 24 42 03:00 28 23 51 03:15 32 27 59 03:30 39 28 67 03:45 42 28 70 04:00 44 24 68 04:15 46 16 62 04:30 38 16 54 04:45 36 30 66 05:00 46 27 73 05:15 43 40 83 05:30 52 13 55 05:45 42 30 72 06:00 35 20 55 0615 42 20 62 06:30 28 14 42 06:45 26 10 36 07:00 24 11 35 07:15 12 10 22 07:30 10 6 16 07:45 13 6 19 08:00 9 4 13 08:15 10 6 16 08:30 11 12 23 08:45 14 5 19 09:00 2 6 8 09:15 4 9 13 09:30 5 6 11 09:45 5 5 10 10:00 4 4 8 10:15 2 0 2 10:30 1 1 2 10:45 1 2 3 11:00 3 1 4 11:15 6 3 9 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 3 0 3 Total 997 684 1681 Percent 59.3% 40.7% Peak 1700 1630 17:00 Vol. 183 113 293 P.H.F. 0.880 0.706 0.883 Page 2 L2 Data Collection Study #: SIX0012 www.L2DataCollection.com Victory W of Meridian VOL Count: Volume / Direction Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Victory Road west of Meridian Road Tech: Judd / Meridian, Idaho Type: Axle Hits / 2 Start 22 -Jan -14 Time Wed WB EB Total 12:00 AM 1 0 1 12:15 2 0 2 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 1 1 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 1 1 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 1 1 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 1 1 03:45 0 1 1 04:00 0 1 1 04:15 0 1 1 04:30 0 2 2 04:45 0 1 1 05:00 0 3 3 05:15 0 4 4 05:30 4 2 6 05:45 0 9 9 06:00 2 6 8 06:15 6 9 15 0630 2 5 7 06:45 6 18 24. 0700 8 17 25 07:15 6 20 26 07:30 14 24 38 07:45 22 77 95 08:00 15 23 38 08:15 12 30 42 08:30 16 30 46 08:45 14 24 38 09:00 14 28 42 09:15 26 32 58 0930 17 20 37 09:45 19 16 35 10:00 18 12 30 1015 22 18 40 10:30 9 22 31 10:45 16 11 27 11:00 20 25 45 11:15 19 54 73 11:30 18 24 42 Total 339 590 929 Percent 36.5% 63.5% Peak 0915 07:45 07:45 Vol. 80 156 221 Grand Total Percent Page 3 1336 1274 51.2% 48.8% 2610 Study* SIX0012 Count: Volume / Direction Tech:Judd. Type: Axle Hits/ 2 Start 12:15 1230 12:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 02:15 02:30 02:45 03:00 03:15 03:30 03:45 04:00 04:15 0430 04:45 05:00 05:15 05:30 05:45 06:00 06:15 06:30 06:45 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 08:00 08:15 08:30 0845 09:00 09:15 09:30 09:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 Peak Vol. P.H.F. Page 1 21 -Jan -14 L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Kentucky S of Victory VOL Kentucky Way south of Victory Rd Meridian, Idaho Total on L2 Data Collection Study #: SIX0012 www.L2DataCollection.com Kentucky S of Victory VOL Count: Volume / Direction Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Kentucky Way south of Victory Rd Tech: Judd Meridian, Idaho Type: Axle Hits/ 2 Start 21 -Jan -14 Time Tue SB NB Total 12:00 PM 6 3 9 12:15 3 0 3 12:30 4 4 8 12:45 7 8 15 01:00 4 10 14 01:15 4 5 9 01:30 5 3 8 01:45 5 2 7 02:00 6 3 9 02:15 6 7 13 02:30 1 1 2 0245 3 4 7 03:00 12 8 20 03:15 14 7 21 03:30 12 14 28 03:45 9 3 12 04:00 10 7 17 04:15 11 2 13 04:30 '14 8 22 04:45 13 8 21 05:00 10 7 17 05:15 8 8 16 05:30 14 8 22 05:45 4 6 10 06:00 8 10 18 06:15 7 2 9 06:30 9 4 13 06:45 8 6 14 07:00 10 5 15 07:15 6 5 11 07:30 2 3 5 07:45 6 0 6 08:00 1 0 1 08:15 3 2 5 08:30 4 6 10 08:45 8 6 14 09:00 4 2 6 09:15 2 2 4 09:30 2 0 2 09:45 0 1 1 10:00 2 0 2 10:15 1 0 1 10:30 1 0 1 1045 0 0 0 11:00 1 0 1 11:15 2 3 5 11:30 0 0 0 Total 272 193 465 Percent 58.5% 41.5% Peak 1600 14:45 15:00 Vol. 48 33 79 P.H.F. 0.857 0.589 0.760 Page 2 L2 Data Collection Study #: SIX0012 www.L2DataCollection.com Kentucky S of Victory VOL Count: Volume / Direction Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Kentucky Way south of Victory Rd Tech: Judd Meridian, Idaho Type: Axle Hits/.2 12:00 AM 0 0 12:15 0 0 12:30 0 1 12:45 0 0 01:00 0 0 01:15 0 0 01:30 0 0 01:45 0 0 02:00 0 0 02:15 0 0 02:30 0 0 02:45 0 0 03:00 0 0 03:15 0 0 03:30 1 1 03:45 0 0 04:00 1 1 04:15 0 1 04:30 0 0 04:45 0 0 05:00 0 0 05:15 0 1 05:30 1 6 05:45 0 3 0600 1 2 06:15 2 2 06:30 1 5 0645 2 9 07:00 1 6 07:15 2 10 07:30 2 is 07:45 6 14 0800 2 4 08:15 2 8 08:30 1 8 08:45 2 8 09:00 4 6 0915 6 6 09:30 2 4 0945 6 5 10:00 6 1 10:15 3 5 10:30 2 5 10:45 4 1 11:00 3 1 11:15 4 5 11:30 4 4 Total 73 157 230 Percent 31.7% 68.3% Peak 09:15 07:00 07:00 Vol. 19 46 57 Grand Total Percent Page 3 345 350 49.6% 50.4% 695 Study #: SIX0012 Count: Volume/ Direction Tech:Judd Type: Axle Hits / 2 Start 21 -Jan -14 12:15 12:30 1245 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 0215 02:30 02:45 0300 03:15 0330 03:45 0400 04:15 04:30 04:45 0500 0515 05:30 0545 06:00 06:15 0630 06:45 0700 07:15 07:30 0745 08:00 0815 08:30 08:45 0900 09:15 0930 09:45 10:00 10:15 1030 1045 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 Total Percent Peak Vol. P.H.F. Page 1 L2 Data Collection www.L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Harris W of Meridian VOL Harris Street west of Meridian Road Meridian, Idaho Total N N N a L2 Data Collection Study #: SIX0012 www.L2DataCollection.com Harris W of Meridian VOL Count: Volume / Direction Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Harris Street west of Meridian Road Tech: Judd Meridian, Idaho Type: Axle Hits/ 2 Start 21 -Jan -14 12:00 PM 1 3 4 12:15 4 2 6 12:30 2 1 3 12:45 2 1 3 01:00 2 4 6 01:15 2 4 6 01:30 0 1 1 01:45 2 0 2 0200 6 2 8 02:15 2 3 5 0230 2 2 4 02:45 1 2 3 03:00 2 1 3 03:15 4 4 8 0330 2 4 6 03:45 4 1 5 04:00 2 5 7 04:15 1 4 5 04:30 3 4 7 04:45 3 6 9 05:00 2 2 4 05:15 2 3 5 05:30 1 0 1 05:45 5 4 9 0600 3 3 6 06:15 6 2 9 06:30 5 2 7 0645 0 1 1 07:00 2 0 2 07:15 1 1 2 07:30 1 0 1 07:45 3 0 3 08:00 0 0 0 08:15 1 0 1 08:30 3 0 3 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 1 1 2 0915 2 0 2 09:30 0 2 2 09:45 0 1 1 10:00 1 0 1 10:15 1 0 1 10:30 0 1 1 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 Total 88 77 165 Percent 53.3% 46.7% Peak 17:45 16:00 1745 Vol. 19 19 30 P.H.F. 0.792 0.792 0.833 Page 2 L2 Data Collection Study #: 81X0012 www.L2DataCollection.com Harris W of Meridian VOL Count: Volume / Direction Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Harris Street west of Meridian Road Tech: Judd Meridian, Idaho Type: Axle Hits / 2 12:00 AM 12:15 12:30 1245 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 0200 02:15 0230 02:45 03:00 03:15 03:30 03:45 04:00 04:15 04:30 04:45 05:00 05:15 0530 05:45 06:00 06:15 06:30 06:45 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 0800 08:15 08:30 08:45 09:00 09:15 09:30 09:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 Total 33 85 118 Percent 28.0% 72.0% Peak 09:15 07:15 08:45 Vol. 11 21 28 Grand Total Percent Page 3 121 162 42.8%0 57.2% 283 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Appendix B: Crash Rate GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Historic Crash Data and Intersection SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2075 PAGE B Total Accidents: 16 Total Fatalities: 0 Total Units: 32 Total Injuries: 9 total reopie: '�s Report Criteria: Victory Rd -Meridian And Meridian Rd Streets : Victory Rd -Meridian Counties:ALL, Cities:ALL - In City And Rural, Meridian Rd Use intersection related crashes Data From: 2013,2012,2011,2010,2009, Year Total 2009 6 2010 2 2011 1 2012 4 2013 3 Severity Total A Injury Accident 1 C Injury Accident 5 Property Dmg Report 10 Day Of Week Total Friday 2 Monday 1 Saturday 3 Sunday 2 Thursday 3 Wednesday 5 Hour Total 9 2 10 3 11 1 12 1 13 2 14 3 151 2 181 1 221 1 Event Name Total Angle 6 Angle Turning 2 Rear -End 19 Side Swipe Same 4 Traffic Signal Support 1 Contributing Circumstance Total Distracted IN or ON Vehic 2 Failed to Obey Signal 2 Following Too Close 4 Improper Lane Change 1 Inattention 5 None 76 Speed Too Fast For Condit 6 Injury Total Incapacitating 1 None Evident 44 Non -Incapacitating 1 Possible 7 Drivers Age Total 15 1 17 1 20 2 21 1 26 1 27 1 29 1 30 2 31 2 32 1 33 1 35 1 36 2 38 1 39 1 45 1 47 1 481 1 49 1 52 2 53 1 55 1 57 2 68 2 701 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Appendix C: Analysis Reports - Existing Traffic aSIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY4,2015 PAGE HCM 2010 TWSC 2014 Existing 1: Kentucky Way & Victory Road AM Peak Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR� Vol, veh/h 135 1 10 27 8 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Ven in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 150 1 11 30 9 36 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 151 0 203 151 Stage 1 - - - - 151 - Stage 2 - - - - 52 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1430 - 786 895 Stage 1 - - - - 877 - Stage 2 - - - - 970 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1430 - 780 895 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 780 - Stage 1 - - - - 877 Stage 2 - - - - 962 Approach EB WB N HCM Control Delay, s 0 2 9.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 869 - - 1430 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - - 0.008 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 - - 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 - Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, Idaho HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2014 Existing 2: Meridian Road & Victory Road AM Peak "t'r*-- A f 1w 1 r Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'i A S t it 0 tt r Volume (veh/h) 16 103 16 28 30 93 18 1213 133 100 349 10 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/hlln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 17 110 17 30 32 99 19 1290 141 106 371 11 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 211 157 24 151 201 171 728 2088 227 291 2374 1062 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.02 0.65 0.65 0.04 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1576 244 1774 1863 1583 1774 3220 351 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 17 0 127 30 32 99 19 707 724 106 371 11 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1820 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1801 1774 1770 1583 0 Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.0 7.7 1.7 1.8 6.8 0.4 26.8 27.1 2.3 4.4 0.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 7.7 1.7 1.8 6.8 0.4 26.8 27.1 2.3 4.4 0.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 181 151 201 171 728 1147 1168 291 2374 1062 V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.00 0.70 0.20 0.16 0.58 0.03 0.62 0.62 0.36 0.16 0.01 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 256 0 587 180 601 511 770 1147 1168 417 2532 1133 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.0 0.0 50.0 44.8 46.4 48.6 6.4 11.8 11.9 10.3 6.9 6.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.1 1.1 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.5 0.0 4.0 0.9 0.9 3.0 0.2 13.3 13.7 1.1 2.2 0.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.1 0.0 51.8 45.0 46.5 49.8 6.4 13.0 13.0 10.9 7.0 6.3 LnGrp LOS D D D D D A B B B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 144 161 1450 488 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.0 48.2 12.9 7.8 Approach LOS D D B A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 17.4 7.3 82.9 8.1 16.4 9.8 80.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 37.0 5.0 82.0 5.0 37.0 13.0 74.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l l ), s 3.0 8.8 2.4 6.4 3.7 97 4.3 29.1 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 1.7 0.0 70.5 0.0 1.7 0.1 43.5 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 16.8 HCM 2010 LOS B Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, Idaho HCM 2010 TWSC 2014 Existing 3: Meridian Road & Harris Street AM Peak Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 17 0 4 0 0 1 0 1307 1 0 378 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - 1 - 1 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - 2 - - 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 19 0 5 0 0 1 0 1485 1 0 430 1 MajorlMinor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1173 1916 215 1701 1917 743 431 0 0 1486 0 0 Stage 1 430 430 - 1486 1486 - - - - - - - Stage 2 743 1486 - 215 431 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 147 67 790 60 67 358 1125 - - 448 - - Stage 1 574 582 - 130 186 - - - - - - - Stage 2 373 186 - 767 581 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 147 67 790 60 67 358 1125 - - 448 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 320 172 - 123 172 - - - - - - - Stage 1 574 582 - 130 186 - Stage 2 372 186 - 763 581 - Approach EB WB NS SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.7 15.1 0 0 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLnl SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1125 361 358 448 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.066 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 15.7 15.1 0 HCM Lane LOS A C C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 0 0 Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, Idaho HCM 2010 TWSC 2014 Existing 1: Kentucky Way & Victory Road PM Peak Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NBR Vol, vehlh 59 4 37 183 1 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 60 4 38 187 1 23 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 64 0 324 62 Stage 1 - - - - 62 - Stage 2 - - - - 262 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1538 - 670 1003 Stage 1 - - - - 961 - Stage 2 - - - - 782 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1538 - 651 1003 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 651 - Stage 1 - - - - 961 Stage 2 - - - - 760 Approach EB' HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBLn1 EST EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 981 - - 1538 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - 0.025 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - - 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th °/stile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 - Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, Idaho HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2014 Existing 2: Meridian Road & Victory Road PM Peak � r ~ < •, 1 l Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'S H 1 t it 'S to 'S ft P Volume (veh/h) 33 54 18 126 110 149 19 534 56 105 1174 28 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 35 57 19 134 117 159 20 568 60 112 1249 30 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 198 117 39 260 252 214 286 1985 209 558 2249 1006 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.61 0.61 0.04 0.64 0.64 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1338 446 1774 1863 1583 1774 3232 341 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 35 0 76 134 117 159 20 310 318 112 1249 30 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1774 0 1784 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1803 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 4.7 7.8 6.8 11.3 0.5 9.6 9.6 2.7 23.2 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 4.7 7.8 6.8 11.3 0.5 9.6 9.6 2.7 23.2 0.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 198 0 156 260 252 214 286 1087 1107 558 2249 1006 V/C Ratio(X) 0.18 0.00 0.49 0.52 0.46 0.74 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.20 0.56 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 223 0 595 260 685 582 325 1120 1141 590 2301 1029 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.5 0.0 50.8 42.6 46.6 48.6 9.8 10.5 10.6 7.9 12.0 7.9 Incr Delay (0), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.8 0.5 1.9 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.0 0.0 2.4 3.9 3.5 5.1 0.2 4.7 4.8 1.3 11.4 0.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.7 0.0 51.7 43.4 47.1 50.5 9.9 10.8 10.8 8.0 12.4 7.9 LnGrp LOS D D D D D A B B A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 111 410 648 1391 Approach Delay, s/veh 50.1 47.2 10.7 11.9 Approach LOS D D B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.4 20.8 7.4 80.3 14.0 15.2 9.9 77.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 43.0 5.0 76.0 9.0 39.0 7.0 74.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 4.1 13.3 2.5 25.2 9.8 6.7 4.7 11.6 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 2.6 0.0 49.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 59.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 18.9 HCM 2010 LOS B Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, Idaho HCM 2010 TWSC 2014 Existing 3: Meridian Road & Harris Street PM Peak Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR Vol, veh/h 15 0 3 0 0 2 3 604 0 1 1236 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None None - - None None Storage Length - - - - 1 - - 1 Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - 2 - - 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 0 3 0 0 2 3 623 0 1 1274 8 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1598 1909 641 1268 1914 311 1282 0 0 623 0 0 Stage 1 1280 1280 - 629 629 - - - - - - - Stage 2 318 629 - 639 1285 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 71 68 417 125 67 685 537 - - 954 - - Stage 1 175 235 - 437 474 - - - - - - - Stage 2 668 474 - 431 233 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 70 68 417 123 67 685 537 - - 954 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 163 206 - 311 202 - - - - - - - Stage 1 174 235 - 435 471 - Stage 2 662 471 - 427 233 - Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 27.1 10.3 0.1 0 HCM LOS D B Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBL NBT NSR EBLnlWBLnl SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 537 181 685 954 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.103 0.003 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.7 27.1 10.3 8.8 - - HCM Lane LOS B D B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.3 0 0 - - Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, Idaho TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Appendix D: Turn Lane Warrant Worksheets SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE D Graycliff Subdivision ITD Right -Turn Lane Analysis 2014 Existing Traffic 0 5 010 15 20 25 DHV or Average Peak -Hour Volume of Vehicles Turning Right Into the Access 0 A peak hour O PM peak hour Right -Turn Highway Posted Volume Volume per ITD Right -Turn Speed (vph) Single Lane Warrant Check AM PM AM PM AM PM No. Intersection Direction (mph) Warranted St and OHarris 5B 55 1 8 190 623 No Yes Yes Meridian Road St and OHarris NB 55 1 0 654 304 No No No Meridian Road 0 5 010 15 20 25 DHV or Average Peak -Hour Volume of Vehicles Turning Right Into the Access 0 A peak hour O PM peak hour Graycliff Subdivision ITD Right -Turn Lane Analysis 2019 (Build -out) Background Traffic Q C N m 60( c 0) 50( L CD a c 40( 0 U G 30( X 0 20( 3 O 0 5 ° 10 15 20 25 DHV or Average Peak -Hour Volume of Vehicles Turning Right Into the Access 0 A peak hour O PM peak hour Right -Turn Highway Posted Volume Volume per ITD Right -Turn Speed (vph) Single Lane Warrant Check AM PM AM I PM AM I PM No. Intersection Direction (mph) Warranted St and OHarris SB 55 Warranted with existing traffic Meridian Road Harris St and 4o NB 55 2 2 742 348 No No No Meridian Road Q C N m 60( c 0) 50( L CD a c 40( 0 U G 30( X 0 20( 3 O 0 5 ° 10 15 20 25 DHV or Average Peak -Hour Volume of Vehicles Turning Right Into the Access 0 A peak hour O PM peak hour Graycliff Subdivision IiD Right -Turn Lane Analysis 2019 (Bu i Id -out) Site + Background Traffic d C �a 60( Q 0 Ir - U) N 50( a� CL 40( C 0 G30( x 0 20( m 3 0 5 ° 10 15 20 25 DHV or Average Peak -Hour Volume of Vehicles Turning Right Into the Access O3 AM peak hour O PM peak hour Right -Turn Highway Posted Volume Volume per ITD Right -Turn Speed (vph) Single Lane Warrant Check AM PM AM I PM AM I PM No. Intersection Direction (mph) Warranted St and OHarris SB 55 Warranted with existing traffic Meridian Road Harris St and 0 NB 55 2 2 742 350 No No No Meridian Road d C �a 60( Q 0 Ir - U) N 50( a� CL 40( C 0 G30( x 0 20( m 3 0 5 ° 10 15 20 25 DHV or Average Peak -Hour Volume of Vehicles Turning Right Into the Access O3 AM peak hour O PM peak hour Graycliff Subdivision ACHD Right -Turn Lane Guidelines for Two -Lane Roadway 2014 Existin¢ Traffic * Ott chart - not warranted 140 920 1nm . 20 Maior-Raex 4D mph 4 speetl 50 k h] Major -Road Posted Right -Turn Volume Volume -One ACHD Right -Turn Speed (vph) Direction(vph) Warrant Check AM PM AM PM AM PM No. Intersection Direction (mph) Warranted O Victory Rd and EB 35 1 4 136 63 No* No* No Kentucky Wy t9Q * Ott chart - not warranted 140 920 1nm . 20 eon 400 500 500 700 800 B00 1000 1100 12D0 Major- Road Volume - One Direction (vph) OAM peak hour PM peak hour Maior-Raex 4D mph 4 speetl 50 k h] 45 mph (7D[mh Ar9d Rlflnt-Tu Lane 5D m tsD h m) 55 mp t9Q 0 6D ftf}D mph mTJ eon 400 500 500 700 800 B00 1000 1100 12D0 Major- Road Volume - One Direction (vph) OAM peak hour PM peak hour Graycliff Subdivision ACHD Right -Turn Lane Guidefinesfor Two -Lane Roadway 2019 (Build -out) Background Traffic *Off chart -not warranted 14a 120 1CO 20 < a]or--R 40 mph 130 speed k ffi) Major -Road Posted Right -Turn Volume Volume -One ACHDRight-Turn Speed (vph) Direction (vph) Warrant Check AM PM AM PM AM PM No. Intersection Direction (mph) Warranted O Victory Rd and EB 35 6 23 175 99 No* No* No Kentucky Wy {90 km^ y *Off chart -not warranted 14a 120 1CO 20 300 400 500 Guo Tao 9001 goo Major- Road Vol ume - One Direction (vph) OAM peak hour ®PM peakhour ioua 1100 1 -MV < a]or--R 40 mph 130 speed k ffi) 45 mph (70 knVh iMd Ri,h4-Tn Lane. 5om (aO h lFi) 55 mp {90 km^ y 0 so (10O mph mm) 300 400 500 Guo Tao 9001 goo Major- Road Vol ume - One Direction (vph) OAM peak hour ®PM peakhour ioua 1100 1 -MV Graycliff Subdivision ACHD Right -Turn Lane Guidelinesfor Two -Lane Roadway 2019 (Build -out) Site + Background Traffic 140 Ftp Foa 20 ftjor-KC04 4D mph 1 speed 30 kmfh) Major -Road Posted Right -Turn Volume Volume -One ACHD Right -Turn Speed (vph) Direction(vph) Warrant Check AM PM AM PM AM PM No. Intersection Direction (mph) Warranted O Victory Rd and EB 35 9 34 178 110 No* No* No Kentucky Wy (90 kmf 140 Ftp Foa 20 300 46D 506 coo 7D0 ace Doe 1g0o 9100 1200 Major- Road Volume - One Direction (vph) OAM peak hour PM peak hour ftjor-KC04 4D mph 1 speed 30 kmfh) 45 mph (70 knFlh naa aivht-7u 50 m (8D knr h 1h) 55 rrtp (90 kmf y 6D (30D mph rNn) 300 46D 506 coo 7D0 ace Doe 1g0o 9100 1200 Major- Road Volume - One Direction (vph) OAM peak hour PM peak hour Graycliff Subdivision ACHD Left -Tum Lane Guidelines for Two -Lane Road Less Than or Equal to 40 mph 2014 Existing Traffic 990 700 Boo 190 El 5%CeY-tums 30% 29% 15% 79% en Y� Add Left -Tu m Lane No Left-tu m Lane O O a 1 D c90 309 40D 509 Advancing Volume (vph) OAMpeakhour 411PM peak hour c3D 700 Advancing Volume Left -Turn Volume Opposing Volume ACHD Left -Turn (vph) (%) (vph) Warrant Check AM F PM AM PM AM PM AM PM No, Intersection Direction Warranted O Victory Rd and Kentucky Wy WB 37 220 27% 17% 136 63 No No No 990 700 Boo 190 El 5%CeY-tums 30% 29% 15% 79% en Y� Add Left -Tu m Lane No Left-tu m Lane O O a 1 D c90 309 40D 509 Advancing Volume (vph) OAMpeakhour 411PM peak hour c3D 700 Graycliff Subdivision ACHD Left -Turn Lane Guidelines for Two -Lane Road Less Than or Equal to 40 mph 2019(Build-out) Backeround Traffic 6UD 70D 900 6 Boo N E � 400 O C G 300 6 O zoo IUD 5%an Vfirms 4U% 20% 15% 10 -Asn A Add Left Trrn Lane No Leff-tu m 'Lane O U 1m =JG 300 40D Urn Advancing Volume (vph) OAMpeakhour PM peak hour ma 7UU Advancing Volume Left -Turn Volume Opposing Volume ACHD Left -Turn (vph) (%) (vph) Warrant Check No. Intersection Direction AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Warranted O Victory Rd and Kentucky Wy WB 65 324 43% 29% 175 99 No No No 6UD 70D 900 6 Boo N E � 400 O C G 300 6 O zoo IUD 5%an Vfirms 4U% 20% 15% 10 -Asn A Add Left Trrn Lane No Leff-tu m 'Lane O U 1m =JG 300 40D Urn Advancing Volume (vph) OAMpeakhour PM peak hour ma 7UU Graycliff Subdivision ACHD Left -Turn Lane Guidelines for Two -Lane Road Less Than or Equal to 40mph 2018(Bui Id -out) Site + Backeround Traffic ago Too ego I too m 5% C tr-toms 59% 29% 15% 10% m V, Add LeftT fn Lame No Left -tun Lane 1 1 a 100 mo 300 400 500 Advancing Volume (vph) OAM peak hour I®PM peak hour 50D 990 Advancing Volume Left -Tum Volume Opposing Volume ACHD Left -Turn (vph) (%) (vph) Warrant Check AM I PM I AM I PM I AM I PM I AM I PM No. Intersection Directionj Warranted O Victory Rd and Kentucky :yd WB 67 331 45% 31% 178 110 No No No ago Too ego I too m 5% C tr-toms 59% 29% 15% 10% m V, Add LeftT fn Lame No Left -tun Lane 1 1 a 100 mo 300 400 500 Advancing Volume (vph) OAM peak hour I®PM peak hour 50D 990 Graycliff Subdivision NCHRP 457, Figure 2 - 4. Guideline for determining minor -road approach geometry at two-way stop -controlled intersections. Harris Street and Meridian Road Intersection 2019 (Build -out) Background Traffic AM INPUT Variable Value Major -road wlume (total of both directions), veh/h: 1,957 Percentage of right -turns on minor road, %: 12% Minor -road volume (one direction), veh/h: 69 OUTPUT Variable Value Limiting minor -road volume (one direction), Leh/h: 40 Guidance for determining minor -road approach geometry: Consider TWO approach lanes s 500 L Consider two approach lanes CD P: 'Cu 300 0 m E 0 p 200 0 0 >: 100 .._-___— ane-approackFlaae-is-o-:k. 0 c_ 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Major -Road Volume (total of both directions), vehlh 0 GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT TUDY MERIDIAN, IDAHO Appendix E: COMPASS Forecasts SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE E 2015 Build: 2015 Demographics on 2015 Network 1/14/2014 9500 141-64 = 59900 50500500 O 5 .65000 59300 9400 0 m 49900 17000 66900 X00 Mir, 1 17000 1_84 m 00 'b mo 0 0 0 and Rd. Over X00 2400 2500 2700 3700 3700 6900 N N 10200 9700 10500 10500 11200 1. 00 2300 2300 250-1 :1 3500 3500 6800 10700 10200 11000 11100 11700 1': 0 olverland Rd. om o tt 0 0 > voi o a m ^ V 1500 900 100 J 90 X00 p 1500 900 9� may' p ^y0 a v � v 2 8 N yr ^ O J a � 0 0 D m p J a rc aN a o v y m o 0 j! Victory Rd o m m e ]0 Victory Rd p 800 m o 800 o Victory Rd Victory Rd Victor, 700 700 600 a 700 600 800 700 900 90 00 700 800 70n 2600 2600 2700 2500 2400 32C 0 2600 2600 2700 2500 2400 300 0 0� m o rm 0 m A h� W p A O O 9 O � o O y m lIJ h M M M 60 goo 800 400 60 900 80O 400 0 o Q oA � N MU U N^ N O O m O N ^a i J 0 o Amity Rd O N O N 1106 1186 1160 1100 1100 1200 2300 2300 2300 2400 2400 2700 12T 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 2300 2300 2300 2400 2400 2500 � m 0 o A n � m 2 V O O O M O O N DAIJAG\2011 Model\Base\TIP\Base\FY1418\b2015\R0UNDED_b2015.NET CB00110(p Licensed to Community Planning Association 2015 Peak Build: 2015 Demographics on 2015 Network 1/14/2014 �, 16 3594 SBA 3010584 =1e 41-84 352 2648 2fi48 55 2 0 93 1226g93 3362 555 5 1-84 d. Overland 1 192 195 208 321 321 550 808 7 831 830 900 8675 97 12E> 228 494 436 477 487228 514 498 -Dverland Rd. nu� of 8 • 141 93 30 93 25 0 ^ry1j of of h �EDyKam NN AN o1`'aNip nmvN �aJroma7{j V! � N � O J i � N N N � N O 2 r a� m om Do 2 n Victory Rd m m 'm o Vic[58 Rd ^,5 66 B6 Victory Rd Victory Rd Victory Rd 59 58 38 70 38 46 73 a9 41 49 47 252 250 257 238 232 415 0 198 197 204 182 174 338 > vN Zuni O A 6 N � A O N �o K ZN O N r 3 85 55 28 of '» 5 59 8141 0o e O O m N ry r(D A n in 'u Z Y V cl � W N r d Amity Rd 115 115 115 118 119218 119220 219 21845 222 262 50 50 50 228 228 220 219221 235 K2 F4545 m m e V 0 D:\UAGN201IModel\Base\TIP\Base\FY1418kb2Ol5\PH—ASSIGN—b2Ol5.NET CSOOIG� Licensed to Community Planning Association 2018 Build: 2018 Demographics on 2018 Network 1/14/2014 62700 9900 52800900 = JO 74-84 67500 62100 8800 O 52300 O� 17200 69500 980y2 00 0 � 17200 9 0 I-84 m 0 'w 0 0 Rd. a ry o u' Overlan 3400 3500 3700 5100 5100 8300 c' N 11200 10700 11400 11500 12200 1521 3400 3500 3701N N 5000 5000 8300 11900 11400 12200 12200 12900 1431 00 oJverland Rd. o 0 �2 N W O O O O O 2 �O 9N N O 1500 1000 100 J n lsoo 1600 100 Boa. ^ycP o tt � b n 0(9 O Oo m O J 9 � O O a N J N O O Eo N O V N o 0 N b N �m O m a � o do � v N N t otoy Rd MN g 0 v O Victory Rd 900 � o o Victory Rd Victory Rd Victory R 800 800 C1 700 800 900 700 800 1010 900 O 800 O0 800{p 2800 2800 2900 2600 2500 3500 2800 2700 2800 2600 2500 3500 Q A� OOp TA W O a X00 Ot o u, J a 0 a 0� `v l0 0 0 J P P 100 1000 1600 800 of N N.a 100 1000 lsoo aaa o 2 m 0 o p a v y a 80 0 � 9 fD y� N n O 9 O � O M 0 M O N O Na � J JP O O N 0 o Amity Rd N 1300 1400 1400 1400 1400 400 2600 2600 2700 2700 2700 2900 1300 00 1300 1400 2600 2600 2800 ° O O 02 O O O J O O O O f` DAUAG\2011 Model\Base\TIP\Base\FY1418\b2018\ROUNDED_b2018.NET CBUOIT Licensed to Community Planning Association 2018 Build: 2018 Demographics on 2018 Network 1/14/2014 m r0 9900 7q 62700 52800900 x 8 7-84 6I 60 620000 970p m 0523005 OJ '17200 69500 970y7- � 17200 I-84 � w 00 96 a a o o d Rd. 0 0 o 0 r Ov 10 3500 3600 3600 5100 5700 8300 11300 10800 11800 11600 72300 )0 3500 3600 380(- - 5100 5100 8300 12000 11500 12300 12300 13000 0 o3verland Rd. o0 tt o ry o n o a m 0 �_ 1560 1000 100 J J 1500 1000 100 700 ^660 6 ' a K � v m 0 6� o0 o a N Nr m U O J � O O � M O C N N O 0 O 0 N � a 2. o aN N m o m 0 m y o 0 o ym o a CN N l/1� Victory Rd {Op n Victory Rd 900 m o o Victory Rd Victory Rd Vict 0 900 900 = 3 700 900 700 0 900 0100 1000 800 900 900 8002600 2800 2800 2900 2600 2600 3 0 2800 2700 2800 2500 3 0 0� 2p0 x m ooh a 2�d$ moo 8 0 o m 0 0 0 0 � r cci '� o O moo 0 J ?O o 1124 m m o 0 v e 600.' O 1600 J O� �p 500 600 1500 1600 800 K n 500 800 1500 1600 800 0 v 0 >? 0 op n a o� m� a o � 0 0 J J N O O 1400 1400 1400 1400 0 1400 1400 o 0 2600 2600 2700 Amity Rd 2700 2800 n n 2900 13 OO 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300 2500 2500 2600 2700 2700 2800 oNa gNde' J Np 0 52 O O U O J D:\UAG\2011Model\Base\studies\Base\TIS_Areaoflnfluence\Biltmore\b2018\ROUNDED b2018.NET CB00110Cq Licensed to Community Planning Association 2018 Peak Build: 2018 Demographics on 2018 Network 1/14/2014 3g1 4� II 3972 611 3362611 = 13 1 888�"�iii -eq �� 136 4745 2927 2927 570 2 357 1284 3641 570 57 3 1284 1-84 jrn bn Rd. 327 330 343 480 480 914 824 933 931 1001 7 283 137 1paa8yVKa6N 283 576 6613 622 631 656 O NOwrlwd Rd. b•- )599 � 0148 1082 9 m0 mN bj TOm nen N h 2 m O J rK b V N n p m N yNj CNI r K Sm m 2.N Sm N v o 0 y^ rG m N Victory �' N Victory Rd Rd 78b c Victory Rd Victory Rd VI 71 70 r' 50 70 82 86 50 58 fit 53 �378 288 285 290 288 261 222 220 227 201 192 3 b m J W W S m N 6 W m K m n b M N J 2m N P 1` 6 94 110 56 ¢ 10 69 160 81 ma 0 � v Sa y� m N K n � N N f� Amity Rd it9 120 120 123 123 123 226 225 222 223 226 2E 86 87 87 91 91 92 260 260 244 244 247 27 r -o N o FN m n_ °1 � m > � d N O V O D:\UAG\2011 Model\Base\TIP\Base\FY1418\b2018\PH_ASSIGN_b2018.NET (°[OI(p Licensed to Community Planning Association 2018 Peak Build: 2018 Demographics on 2018 Network 1/14/2014 �9 609 1-84 3972 336309 of`38j 4749 2918 563 2 355 •1284 3639 56 1284 I-84 0f6 nd Rd. Overland Rd 13 338 341 354 491 491 716^ 926 836 945 943 1013 933 9 130 137 16'8 283 283 575 671 609 632 641 666 562 Sverland Rd. w1 j 4'C 32982 N 100 JN�mO af2 rnm NomNmNw vN°Nmm°Y'i = 8 j a ofr J o N m Y C N O � m � "2 M N CJ r h t7 D O m M O m V) N -3 Victory Rd y 76 TO °r' Victory Rd Victory Rd Victory Rd 1 74 73 I5 56 73 82 86 $ 56 0 �!9 63 0 54 �8 rn 289 286 292 269 262 445 6 m 225 223 230 204 195 385 'S cNn 2 m N � m N O � tit A m n c_ 1124 m J P t$ m � r N � th O ryFJ iii l7 N S 53 6g 146 110 56 of ro a 32 42 100 160 81 m Y m wn N m a n m M N J 2 < N r r N O II � O N N r n Y m N t+l N P a d C J A W' Amity Rd N Y 118 118 118 121 121 122 235 234 231 231 235 284 87 87 87 92 92 92 261 260 244 244 247 275 r � 3 � N v� m Y M ro C1 A 4 � m N U J N r a of � m n m D:\UAG\2011Model\Base\studies\Base\TIS Areaoflnfluence\Biltmore\b2018\PH_ASSIGN_b2018.NET (_.,B001cp Licensed to Community Planning Association 2012 Build: 2012 Demographics on 2012 Network 1/14/2014 N Y 00 r 14600 1134 65900104011 55600 = 6 70200 65200 10000 m 00 55200 00 72300 17100 1-84 m o 0 $ o a 1 Rd. O Overland 1 4100 4200 4400 5700 5700 8900 N N 12100 11700 12300 12400 13000 1570( 1 4100 4200 440 u u 5700 5700 8900 12700 12200 12900 12900 13600 1510( g)verland Rd. m g a n � a o o0 0 2 of N N r O 7 n p p NO O V p O y U vm o N m N o� 0 1800 1000 100 ° -' m 1600 1000 100 zoo y00 O o tt m o 2 vp ° mo 0 16 ^Cl J a � 0 0 0 0 C N N O O O O a P Cl 2 a o 9N N m o 0 0 N 0 N II Vict"Y Rd M Victory Rd 1200 17 o o Victory Rd Victory Rd Victory Rd 1300 1300 1� 0 1100 1300 1100 1400 1200 1400 1200 200 1000 1 OOo 2800 2800 2800 2500 2400 3400 0 2800 2800 2800 2500 2400 3500 o 0 m a oR m o xm 0 m a 0 0 0 0 0 o 0� a N � N C (O O N 100 1100 2100 1000 of 100 1100 2100 1000 a o 6 N O m Sn O O � O J 0 0 0 � 0 � 0 m 0 m Amity Rd1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 2700 2700 2800 2800 2900 3000 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 2600 2600 2700 2700 2800 2900 F O O W O O N O E AUAG\2011 Model\Base\TIP\Base\FY1418\b2020\ROUNDED_b2020.NET CB001cp Licensed to Community Planning Association 2020 Peak Build: 2020 Demographics on 2018 Network 1/14/2014 4294 !! 3634 bb S 6 5022 3186 3186 608 m y0. 2578 1207 3865 606 608 A y 1207 1-84 N 'o s2 y° m m d. m v� f � 390 394 407 555 555 774 969 878 984 981 1050 163 172 202 317 317 602 702 641 659 669 692 'm TOverland Rd. v y a N ym j O 0 y P 1A O O N m 146 103 34 J J 16 85 9 y yb a K v � o m m N N Ary S p � T r N N N O J Y O N N J a m W Ip K S m m 2 C ]N - Victary Rd m w Victory Rd DO 90 Victory Rd Victory Rd Vi 85 84 P7. 83 84 95 63 70 100 ^b 64 90 74 c, 307 303 307 279 272 233 231 237 207 198 n m oN w r � p 6 N N Gu J of N N aJ N 8 98 140 69 ¢ 13 73 208 104 w N Nry r n N 2 n(� A � U MN N J IT r W r r N V N r m �a r J � � m iq Amity Rd 144 147 147 147 247 246 241 242 245 2E 97 102 102 102 276 276 254 254 257 28 F1441 R U O D:\UAG\20llModel\Base\TIP\3ase\FY1418\b2O2O\PH—ASSIGN—b2O2O.NET (mollJI(p Licensed to Community Planning Association TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Appendix F: Off -Site Trip Generation Summary SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE F Fall Creek Subdivision — Build -out Trip Generation Summary (296 single-family lots) Total Trip Rate Total Period per Unit Trips Entering Exiting Weekday Daily (vpd) 9.52 2,818 50% 1,409 50% 1,409 Weekday AM Peak (vph) 0.75 222 25% 56 75% 167 Weekday PM Peak (vph) 1.00 296 63% 186 37% 110 Biltmore Estates Subdivision — Trip Generation Summary (159 single-family lots) 2016 Phase 1 2018 Phase 2 Total Trips Entering ITE Trip Rate Total Total Land Use Category Code Size Period per Unit Trips Entering Exiting Weekday Daily (vpd) 9.52 781 50% 390 50% 390 Single -Family Detached Housing 210 82 DU Weekday AM Peak Hour (vph) 0.75 62 25% 16 75% 46 Weekday PM Peak Hour (vph) 1.00 82 63% 52 37% 30 2018 Phase 2 Revolution Ridge Development — Build -out Trip Generation Summary (64 single-family lots) Trip Rate Total Period Total Trips Entering Exiting ITE Trip Rate Total 50% 305 50% 305 Land Use Category Code Size Period per Unit Trips Entering Exiting Weekday Daily (vpd) 9.52 733 50% 367 50% 367 Single -Family Detached Housing 210 77 DU Weekday AM Peak Hour (vph) 0.75 58 25% 15 75% 43 Weekday PM Peak Hour (vph) 1.00 77 63% 49 37% 28 Revolution Ridge Development — Build -out Trip Generation Summary (64 single-family lots) Trip Rate Total Period per Unit Trips Entering Exiting Weekday Daily (vpd) 9.52 609 50% 305 50% 305 Weekday AM Peak (vph) 0.75 48 25% 12 75% 36 Weekday PM Peak (vph) 1.00 64 63% 40 37% 24 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO Appendix G: Analysis Reports - 2019 (Build -Out) Background Traffic SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAYO, 2015 PAGE G HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Background 1: Kentucky Way & Victory Road AM Peak Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 169 6 28 37 25 81 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 188 7 31 41 28 90 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 194 0 294 191 Stage 1 - - - - 191 - Stage 2 - - - - 103 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1379 - 697 851 Stage 1 - - - - 841 - Stage 2 - - - - 921 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1379 - 681 851 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 681 - Stage 1 - - - - 841 Stage 2 - - - - 900 Approach EB WB N13 _ HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.3 10.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBLnl EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 804 - - 1379 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.146 - - 0.023 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 - - 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 0.5 - - 0.1 - Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 Background 2: Meridian Road & Victory Road AM Peak .1* --v f- `- 4\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 50.2 13 Vi ? r D 4A D Tt P Volume (veh/h) 44 136 22 34 41 105 23 1421 172 125 411 21 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 83.0 1.00 1.00 11.0 1.00 1.00 4.8 1.00 1.00 8.0 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 145 23 36 44 112 24 1512 183 133 437 22 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 237 194 31 152 223 190 661 2015 241 220 2312 1034 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.63 0.63 0.04 0.65 0.65 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1570 249 1774 1863 1583 1774 3184 381 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 168 36 44 112 24 833 862 133 437 22 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1819 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1795 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 0.0 10.9 2.2 2.6 8.2 0.6 39.9 41.5 3.2 6.0 0.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 0.0 10.9 2.2 2.6 8.2 0.6 39.9 41.5 3.2 6,0 0.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 237 0 225 152 223 190 661 1120 1136 220 2312 1034 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.75 0.24 0.20 0.59 0.04 0.74 0.76 0.60 0.19 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 252 0 535 173 548 466 693 1120 1136 303 2401 1074 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.2 0.0 51.8 45.7 48.6 51.0 7.4 15.6 15.9 20.0 8.4 7.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.9 0.3 0.2 1.1 0.0 2.9 3.2 2.0 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.4 0.0 5.6 1.1 1.4 3.7 0.3 20.3 21.4 2.9 2.9 0.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.3 0.0 53.7 46.0 48.7 52.1 7.4 18.5 19.1 22.0 8.4 7.5 LnGro LOS D D D D D A B B C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 215 192 1719 592 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.8 50.2 18.7 11.4 Approach LOS D D B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 19.7 7.8 85.9 8.5 20.1 10.3 83.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 36.0 5.0 83.0 5.0 36.0 11.0 77.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 4.8 10.2 2.6 8.0 4.2 12.9 5.2 43.5 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 2.3 0.0 72.0 0.0 2.2 0.1 33.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.9 HCM 2010 LOS C Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Background 3: Meridian Road & Harris Street AM Peak Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 61 0 8 2 0 41 2 1480 2 27 432 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - 50 - - 50 - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - 2 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 69 0 9 2 0 47 2 1682 2 31 491 17 Major/Minor Minor2 Wort Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1397 2241 245 1995 2240 842 491 0 0 1684 0 0 Stage 1 552 552 - 1688 1688 - - - - - - - Stage 2 845 1689 - 307 552 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 2.22 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 101 42 755 36 42 308 1069 376 - - Stage 1 486 513 - 97 148 - - - - - Stage 2 324 148 - 678 513 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 80 38 755 33 38 308 1069 376 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 215 109 - 91 135 - - - Stage 1 485 471 - 97 148 - Stage 2 274 148 - 615 471 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 27.9 20.8 0 0.9 HCM LOS D C Minor LanelMajor Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLnl SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1069 - - 234 277 376 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.002 - - 0.335 0.176 0.082 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 27.9 20.8 15.4 - HCM Lane LOS A - - D C C - HCM 95th %file Q(veh) 0 - - 1.4 0.6 0.3 - Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Background 1: Kentucky Way & Victory Road PM Peak Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 76 23 94 230 12 57 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 78 23 96 235 12 58 Major/Minor Majof1 Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 101 0 516 89 Stage 1 - - - - 89 - Stage 2 - - - - 427 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1491 - 519 969 Stage 1 - - - - 934 - Stage 2 - - - - 658 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1491 - 481 969 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 481 - Stage 1 - - - - 934 Stage 2 - - - - 609 Approach EB WB NB. HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.2 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor LanelMajor Mvmt NBLnl EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 824 1491 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.085 0.064 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.2 - Six Mile Engineering; PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 Background 2: Meridian Road & Victory Road PM Peak Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations A R r "t ?t. I 4T r Volume (veh1h) 56 73 22 151 149 169 26 634 74 131 1380 67 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh1h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 60 78 23 161 159 180 28 674 79 139 1468 71 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 203 166 49 271 283 241 217 1897 222 484 2181 976 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.62 0.62 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1383 408 1774 1863 1583 1774 3193 374 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 60 0 101 161 159 180 28 373 380 139 1468 71 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1791 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1797 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 6.6 9.0 9.9 13.7 0.8 13.6 13.6 3.8 34.1 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 6.6 9.0 9.9 13.7 0.8 13.6 13.6 3.8 34.1 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 203 0 215 271 283 241 217 1052 1068 484 2181 976 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.00 0.47 0.59 0.56 0.75 0.13 0.35 0.36 0.29 0.67 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 204 0 528 271 608 517 244 1052 1068 528 2199 984 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter([) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.0 0.0 51.5 45.2 49.3 50.9 13.5 13.1 13.1 9.7 15.8 9.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.6 2.4 0.7 1.8 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %vile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.8 0.0 3.3 1.1 5.2 6.1 0.4 6.7 6.8 1.9 16.8 1.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.3 0.0 52.1 47.6 50.0 52.7 13.7 13.4 13.4 9.9 16.7 9.7 LnGrp LOS D D D D D B B B A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 161 500 781 1678 Approach Delay, s/veh 49.9 50.2 13.4 15.9 Approach LOS D D B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 24.1 8.1 83.3 14.0 20.1 10.9 80.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 41.0 5.0 78.0 9.0 37.0 9.0 74.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.7 15.7 2.8 36.1 11.0 8.6 5.8 15.6 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 3.4 0.0 41.2 0.0 3.5 0.1 57.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.5 HCM 2010 LOS C Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Background 3: Meridian Road & Harris Street PM Peak Intersection Int Delay, slveh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 42 0 6 2 0 30 8 685 2 44 1400 56 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - 50 - - 50 - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - 2 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 43 0 6 2 0 31 8 706 2 45 1443 58 MajorlMinor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1904 2259 722 1536 2258 354 1443 0 0 708 0 0 Stage 1534 1534 - 724 724 - - - - - - - Stage 2 370 725 - 812 1534 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver -42 41 369 79 41 642 466 - - 887 - - Stage 1 122 177 - 383 429 - - - - - - - Stage 2 622 428 - 339 177 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -38 38 369 74 38 642 466 - - 887 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 112 148 - 236 144 - - - - - - - Stage 1 120 168 - 376 422 - Stage 2 582 421 - 316 168 - Approach EB WB NB SB yr HCM Control Delay, s 52.7 11.6 0.1 0.3 HCM LOS F B Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLnl SBL SBT SBR Capacity (vehlh) 466 - - 123 580 887 - - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.018 - - 0.402 0.057 0.051 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.9 - - 52.7 11.6 9.3 - - HCM Lane LOS B - - F B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.7 0.2 0.2 - - -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Six Mile Engineerng, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MERIDIAN, IDAHO Appendix H: Signal Warrant Worksheets SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE H TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS 2014 EXISTING HOULY VOLUMES AND PERCENTAGES 14,278 100% 162 100% Meridian Road Harris Street Total EB Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hour Volume % Volume % 12:00 AM 79 0.6% 7 4.3% 1:00 AM 44 0.3% 9 5.6% 2:00 AM 46 0.3% 9 5.6% 3:00 AM 55 0.4% 10 6.2% 4:00 AM 114 0.8% 19 11.7% 5:00 AM 319 2.2% 9 5.6% 6:00 AM 734 5.1% 8 4.9% 7:00 AM 1,108 7.8% 1 0.6% 8:00 AM 793 5.6%° 0 0.0% 9:00 AM 666 4.7% 4 2.5% 10:00 AM 651 4.6% 1 0.6% 11:00 AM 718 5.0% 0 0.0% 12:00 PM 757 5.3% 1 0.6% 1:00 PM 781 5.5% 1 0.6% 2:00 PM 840 5.9% 0 0.0% 3:00 PM 1,004 7.0% 1 0.6% 4:00 PM 1,157 8.1% 4 2.5% 5:00 PM 1,280 9.0% 3 1.9% 6:00 PM 1,021 7.1% 9 5.6% 7:00 PM 691 4.8% 19 11.7% 8:00 PM 569 4.0% 16 9.9% 9:00 PM 432 3.0% 15 9.3% 10:00 PM 264 1.8% 8 4.9% 11:00 PM 157 1.1% 8 4.9% 14,278 100% 162 100% 2019 (BUILD -OUT) BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Warrant 1, Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume (Not Satisifed) 25,000 621 Meridian Condition B Road Harris Condition A Interruption of (Major Street Minimum Vehicular Continuous Hour Total) (EB Minor) Volume @ 70% Traffic @ 70% 12:00 AM 139 27 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 1:00 AM 77 35 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 2:00 AM 81 35 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 3:00 AM 96 38 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 4:00 AM 199 73 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 5:00 AM 559 35 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 6:00 AM 1,284 31 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 7:OOAM 1,940 4 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 8:00 AM 1,389 0 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 9:00 AM 1,167 15 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 10:00 AM 1,139 4 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 11:00 AM 1,257 0 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 12:00 PIA 1,325 4 Not Satisfied NotSatisfed 1:00 PM 1,368 4 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 2:00 PM 1,471 0 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 3:00 PM 1,757 4 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 4:00 PM 2,026 15 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied. 5:00 PM 2,241 12 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 6:00 PM 1,787 35 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 7;00 PM 1,210 73 NotSatisfed Satisfied 8:00PM 995 61 Not Satisfied Satisfied 9:00 PM 756 58 Not Satisfied Satisfied 10:00PM 462 31 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 11:00 PM 275 31 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 25,000 621 2019 )BUILD -OUT) BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Voluu a (Not satisfied) Figure 4C-2, Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) (Community Less Than 10,000 Population or Above 40 mph on Major Street) 400 x o. x u 0 i 300 Q 2 ON MORE LANES & 1 LANE w 7 O to w � 200 x C V C NOTSATISFlEO SATISFIED O 2 100 0 0 SW 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 MAJOR STREET -TOTALOF BOTH APPROACHES VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 2019 (BUILD -OUT) SITE+BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Warrant 1, Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume (Not Satisfied) Meridian ConditionA Condition Road Harris Minimum Interruption of (Major Street Vehicular Volume Continuous Hour Total) (EB Minor) @ 70% Traffic @ 70% 12!00 AM 139 48 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 1:00 AM 78 61 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 2:00 AM 81 61 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 3:00 AM 96 68 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 4:00 AM 200 130 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 500 AM 561 61 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 6:00AM 1,288 55 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 7:00 AM 1,945 7 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 8:00 AM 1,393 0 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 9:00 AM 1,170 27 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 10:00 AM 1,143 7 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 11:00 AM 1,260 0 NotSatisfed NotSatisfed 12:00 PM 1,329 7 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 1:00 PM 1,371 7 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 2:00 PM 1,475 0 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 3:00 PM 1,762 7 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 4:00 PM 2,032 27 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 5:00 PM 2,248 20 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 6:00 PM 1,792 61 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 7:00 PM 1,213 130 Not Satisfied Satisfied 8:00 PM 998 109 Not Satisfied Satisfied 9:00 PM 758 102 Not Satisfied Satisfied 10:00 PM 463 55 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 11:00 PM 276 55 Not Satisfied Not Satisfied 25,070 1,106 2019 (BUILD -OUT) SITE+BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Mrrant2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume (Not Satiafied) Figure 4C-2, Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) (Community Less Than 10,000 Population or Above 40 mph on Major Street) aao i � SATISFIED 6 NOT SATISFIED 4 Q O C i 900 6 w 2 OR MORE IANES &Z LANES O w Z 200 lz z H C O z 100 0 a 500 1000 1500 2000 1500 3000 MAJOR STREET- TOTALOF BOTH APPROACHES VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) � SATISFIED NOT SATISFIED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Appendix Site Plus GRAYCLIFF SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO I: Analysis Reports - 2019 (Build -Out) Background Traffic SIX MILE ENGINEERING, PA MAY 4, 2015 PAGE I HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Site + Background 1: Kentucky Way & Victory Road AM Peak Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.1 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 169 9 30 37 35 88 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized 4.12 - None 6.22 None - None Storage Length - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 3.518 0 0 - - Grade, % 0 - Stage 1 0 0 840 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 188 10 33 41 39 98 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minort 0.173 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 198 0 301 193 Stage 1 - - - - 193 - Stage 2 - - - - 108 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1375 - 691 849 Stage 1 - - - - 840 - Stage 2 - - - - 916 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1375 - 674 849 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 674 - Stage 1 - - - - 840 Stage 2 - - - - 893 Approach EB WB NB j HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.4 10.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 791 - - 1375 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.173 - - 0.024 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - - 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - - 0.1 - Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 Site + Background 2: Meridian Road & Victory Road AM Peak Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 50.4 A "t 4 r Vi RA 1 TR r Volume (veh/h) 44 136 22 36 41 105 23 1461 179 125 426 21 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 82.0 1.00 1.00 9.0 1.00 1.00 4.8 1.00 1.00 8.3 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 145 23 38 44 112 24 1554 190 133 453 22 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 238 194 31 152 224 191 651 2016 243 210 2314 1035 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.63 0.63 0.04 0.65 0.65 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1570 249 1774 1863 1583 1774 3181 384 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 168 38 44 112 24 856 888 133 453 22 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1819 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1795 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 0.0 11.0 2.3 2.6 8.3 0.6 42.3 44.2 3.2 6.3 0.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 0.0 11.0 2.3 2.6 8.3 0.6 42.3 44.2 3.2 6.3 0.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 238 0 225 152 224 191 651 1122 1138 210 2314 1035 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.75 0.25 0.20 0.59 0.04 0.76 0.78 0.63 0.20 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 252 0 546 172 559 475 682 1122 1138 264 2355 1053 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(]) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.4 0.0 52.2 46.0 48.8 51.3 7.4 16.0 16.4 22.1 8.5 7.5 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 0.1 0.0 1.9 0.3 0.2 1.1 0.0 3.4 3.8 2.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/pile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.4 0.0 5.6 1.1 1.4 3.7 0.3 21.5 22.9 3.0 3.0 0.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.6 0.0 54.0 46.3 49.0 52.4 7.4 19.4 20.1 24.5 8.5 7.5 LnGrp LOS D D D D D A B C C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 215 194 1768 608 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.2 50.4 19.6 12.0 Approach LOS D D B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 19.9 7.8 86.6 8.6 20.2 10.3 84.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 37.0 5.0 82.0 5.0 37.0 9.0 78.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 10.3 2.6 8.3 4.3 13.0 5.2 46.2 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 2.3 0.0 72.3 0.0 2.2 0.1 31.6 Intersection Summary -MOM=" HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.6 HCM 2010 LOS C Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Site + Background 3: Meridian Road & Harris Street AM Peak Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement ESL EBT EBR WSL WBT WBR NK NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 108 0 11 2 0 41 3 1480 2 27 432 32 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - - 50 - - 50 - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - 2 - - 2 - - 2 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 123 0 12 2 0 47 3 1682 2 31 491 36 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow Ail 1400 2243 245 1997 2242 842 491 0 0 1684 0 0 Stage 552 552 - 1690 1690 - - - - - - - Stage 2 848 1691 - 307 552 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 100 42 755 36 42 308 1069 - - 376 - - Stage 1 486 513 - 97 148 - - - - - - - Stage 2 322 148 - 678 513 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -79 38 755 33 38 308 1069 - - 376 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 214 109 - 91 135 - - - - - - Stage 1 485 471 - 97 148 - Stage 2 273 148 - 612 471 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 39.3 20.8 0 0.8 HCM LOS E C Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLnl SBL SBT SBR _ Capacity (vehlh) 1069 - - 214 755 277 376 - - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.003 - - 0.573 0.017 0.176 0.082 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 42.3 9.8 20.8 15.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - E A C C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 3.2 0.1 0.6 0.3 - - exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Site + Background 4: Harris Street & Kentucky Way AM Peak Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WEIR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 17 50 18 16 48 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 19 56 20 18 53 6 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 38 0 0 122 29 Stage 1 - - - 29 - Stage 2 - - - 93 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1572 - - 873 1046 Stage 1 - - - 994 - Stage 2 - - - 931 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1572 - - 863 1046 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 863 - Stage 1 - 994 Stage 2 - 920 Approach EB WE SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0 9.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WET WBR SBLnl Capacity (veh/h) 1572 - - 877 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.067 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - 9.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Site + Background 1: Kentucky Way & Victory Road PM Peak Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 76 34 101 230 19 61 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 78 35 103 235 19 62 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 112 0 536 95 Stage 1 - - - - 95 - Stage 2 - - - - 441 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1478 - 505 962 Stage 1 - - - - 929 - Stage 2 - - - - 648 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1478 - 465 962 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 465 - Stage 1 - - - - 929 Stage 2 - - - - 596 Approach EB WB N&:j0mL HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.3 10.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (vehlh) 767 1478 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.106 0.07 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 7.6 HCM Lane LOS B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 Site + Background 2: Meridian Road & Victory Road PM Peak Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations 51.2 A R ? r D 0 '1 ?? r Volume (veh/h) 56 73 22 158 149 169 26 661 78 131 1426 67 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 79.0 1.00 1.00 9.0 1.00 1.00 5.7 1.00 1.00 38.2 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 60 78 23 168 159 180 28 703 83 139 1517 71 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 202 166 49 269 282 239 207 1905 225 471 2190 980 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.60 0.60 0.05 0.62 0.62 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1383 408 1774 1863 1583 1774 3190 376 1774 3539 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 60 0 101 168 159 180 28 390 396 139 1517 71 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 0 1791 1774 1863 1583 1774 1770 1796 1774 1770 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 6.7 9.0 10.0 13.8 0.8 14.4 14.4 3.8 36.2 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 6.7 9.0 10.0 13.8 0.8 14.4 14.4 3.8 36.2 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 202 0 214 269 282 239 207 1057 1073 471 2190 980 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.00 0.47 0.62 0.56 0.75 0.14 0.37 0.37 0.30 0.69 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 202 0 509 269 588 500 233 1057 1073 514 2207 987 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.5 0.0 52.0 46.3 49.9 51.5 14.1 13.2 13.2 9.8 16.1 9.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.6 3.4 0.7 1.8 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.8 0.0 3.3 1.5 5.2 6.1 0.4 7.1 7.2 1.9 17.8 1.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.8 0.0 52.6 49.7 50.6 53.3 14.3 13.5 13.5 10.0 17.2 9.7 LnGro LOS D D D D D B B B B B A Approach Vol, veh/h 161 507 814 1727 Approach Delay, s/veh 50.5 51.2 13.5 16.3 Approach LOS D D B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 24.2 8.1 84.4 14.0 20.2 10.9 81.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 40.0 5.0 79.0 9.0 36.0 9.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s 5.7 15.8 2.8 38.2 11.0 8.7 5.8 16.4 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 3.4 0.0 40.2 0.0 3.5 0.1 58.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 22.8 HCM 2010 LOS C Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Site + Background 3: Meridian Road & Harris Street PM Peak Intersection Int Delay, slveh 3.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol,veh/h 73 0 8 2 0 30 12 685 2 44 1400 109 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - - 50 - - 50 - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # - 2 - 2 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 75 0 8 2 0 31 12 706 2 45 1443 112 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1912 2267 722 1544 2266 354 1443 0 0 708 0 0 Stage 1534 1534 - 732 732 - - - - - - - Stage 2 378 733 - 812 1534 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -41 40 369 78 40 642 466 - - 887 - - Stage 1 122 177 - 379 425 - - - - - - - Stage 2 616 424 - 339 177 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -37 37 369 72 37 642 466 - - 887 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 111 147 - 232 140 - - - - - Stage 1 119 168 - 369 414 - Stage 2 571 413 - 315 168 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 80.8 11.6 0.2 0.3 HCM LOS F B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLnl SBL SBT SBR Capacity (vehlh) 466 - - 111 369 578 887 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 - - 0.678 0.022 0.057 0.051 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.9 - - 88 15 11.6 9.3 HCM Lane LOS B - - F C B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 3.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined `: All major volume in platoon Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Site + Background 4: Harris Street & Kentucky Way PM Peak Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 11 33 57 53 30 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 37 63 59 33 20 Major/Minor Major? Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 122 0 0 154 93 Stage 1 - - - 93 - Stage 2 - - - 61 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1465 - - 838 964 Stage 1 - - - 931 - Stage 2 - - - 962 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1465 - - 831 964 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 831 - Stage 1 - 931 Stage 2 - 954 Approach EB WB SBS HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0 9.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/MajorMvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLnl Capacity (veh/h) 1465 - - - 876 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.061 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2 Six Mile Engineering, PA Graycliff Subdivision May 2015 Meridian, ID