The URL can be used to link to this page

CZC_14-102_T-Mobile_Wireless_Communication_Facility�trl' CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE REPORT C -/VI E NDIAN DATE: February 12, 2015 TO: Terry Cox FROM: Bill Parsons, Planning Supervisor SUBJECT: T -Mobile Wireless Communication Facility - CZC-14-102 OWNER: West Ada School District DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant, Terry Cox, requests Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) approval to operate and construct a new wireless communication facility on 4.46 acres of land in the L -O zoning district. The scope of work includes a 100 -foot tall monopole with a slim -line design, six (6) panel antennas and equipment panel screened by a 6 -foot tall solid vinyl fence and associated landscape improvements. The site is located at 1855 E. Heritage Park Lane, DECISION The applicant's request for Certificate of Zoning Compliance is approved with the conditions listed in this report. Note: This is not a building permit. Please contact Building Services at (208) 887-2211 to verify if you need a building permit and/or inspection. You must complete that process before you commence the use or construction. Please contact Building Services for additional details about building permits and inspections. Site Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11 -3A-7 and 11 -3A -6B. Process Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall complete all improvements related to public life, safety, and health as set forth in UDC 11 -5C -3B. A surety agreement may be accepted for other improvements in accord with UDC 11 -5C -3C. 2. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Division staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11- 3B -14A. 3. The site/landscape plan prepared by Land Design and Development, dated October 27, 2014, labeled a-1 and a-2, are approved on February 12, 2015 by the City of Meridian Planning Division as shown in Exhibit B. Conditions Document T -Mobile Wireless Communication Facility 4. The elevations prepared by Land Design and Development, dated October 27, 2014, labeled a-3 and a-4, are approved on February 12, 2015 by the City of Meridian Planning Division as shown in Exhibit C. 5. The approved site/landscape plan and/or elevations may not be altered without prior written approval of the City of Meridian Planning Division. 6. The applicant shall pay any applicable impact fees prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. If any changes must be made to the site plan to accommodate ACHD requirements, the applicant shall submit a new site plan to the City of Meridian Planning Division for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Ongoing Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11 -313-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-313-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-313-14. 2. The applicant shall comply with the outdoor storage as an accessory use standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-14. 3. The project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances. 4. The issuance of this CZC does not release the applicant from any previous requirements of the other permits issued for the site. 5. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 6. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 7. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11-3A-3. 8. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to meet the specific use standards for the proposed use as set forth in UDC 11-4-3-43. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW The applicant or a party of record may request City Council review of a decision of the Director. All requests for review shall be filed in writing with the Planning Division on or before February 27, 2015, within fifteen (15) days after the written decision is issued, and contain the information listed in UDC 11 -5A -6B. If City Council review of the decision is not requested, the action of the Director represents a final decision on a land use application. You have the right to request a regulatory taking analysis under Idaho Code 67-8003. EXPIRATION Certificates of Zoning Compliance issued in conjunction with a proposed use shall expire if the use has not commenced within one year of the date of issuance of the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Certificates of Zoning Compliance issued in conjunction with construction or alteration of a structure shall expire if the construction or alteration has not commenced within one year of the Conditions Document 2 T -Mobile Wireless Communication Facility date of issuance of the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. In accord with the above provisions, the subject Certificate of Zoning Compliance is valid until February 12, 2016. EXHIBITS A. Vicinity Map B. Site/Landscape Plan (dated: October 27, 2014) C. Elevations (dated: October 27, 2014) Conditions Document 3 T -Mobile Wircless Communication Facility A. Vicinity Map Conditions Document 4 T -Mobile Wireless Communication Facility U ❑ YNIYIiIfiMY IMOPM�iION II ii Fl T . sMobi66/ REVISIONS 4ft- MERIDIAN MEDICAL ARTS 1789 EAST HERITAGE PARK ROAD MERIDIAN ID m�.'""";��s�;'�:��,,.=„aaa.,.�rc SL02049B ,•spa a ocn,wxww wanrcwr ccvrncrs m¢mvnYx 588: •A I a q _ _ -_ �aN F 4T.. :� � � ��.w I � �uuv.. I _ III iw• 16 iA II I�I SII !, t� a bgi• .. I 4 12221 } � V vv�, 4 IIS I � � � � 'el�F' seas_ m.... E 1 .0�....., K B%Wn..onnauv rtoyuuro�m "mom w�� NI ' � L 4 fig+ DRstiny SI NOFF SL020498 fd14lFI1LiKKI�aE R t-1 Conditions Document 4 T -Mobile Wireless Communication Facility to Plan (dated: October 27 .>�Wpw,p, � o � yN• w.w°RL��ww Offi Sryn��U U Lo Wss. GRAPHICIC SCAM �� ® wppe IMsllny ^ 1 wee �CR 9 nRR1}�11 SL02049B OVERALL SITE PIAN 1 M- rL[c,xervu,,a. � CONSTRUCTION PIAN KEYERNRTES I II I ptmmwrwvRavr/°IRrw a�m..uv, w. II `••.�0��6% I, I, cswnawv..a O �� ,�/ anua[°wua.wrmr. / /�T y� / .T �� [° wer uuwaa �xowvrtuu w[axcrcM rvm[�l:�B� o 0 Nnm�M�lil u•� C� /f / Cco gy 1A> V [,Rix�YPvvcmbv�i[roa,q �.Imaixory T a p' O %' ------ ---- rva oa c- W[ry NEN SHE �.,I-sting oma[°[ u �� a_iiexmlcEIARKLI v SLa 02n049B µ� Y a-/ CNLAgGEU_51{CLAN 1 I iib aswo I / I I �wmmm,wa � a�wm'naa�xwa__ Nunz'�°[µwiina[�wcv�w\�� z,�nor a .>�Wpw,p, � o � yN• w.w°RL��ww Offi Sryn��U U Lo Wss. GRAPHICIC SCAM �� ® wppe IMsllny ^ 1 wee �CR 9 nRR1}�11 SL02049B OVERALL SITE PIAN 1 M- rL[c,xervu,,a. � Conditions Document 5 T -Mobile Wireless Communication Facility CONSTRUCTION PIAN KEYERNRTES ptmmwrwvRavr/°IRrw REVISIONS `••.�0��6% amaeO�mE�irtamrn,a��Lvm O �� ,�/ anua[°wua.wrmr. / /�T y� / .T �� [° wer uuwaa �xowvrtuu w[axcrcM rvm[�l:�B� [e Nnm�M�lil u•� C� /f / Cco gy 1A> V [,Rix�YPvvcmbv�i[roa,q �.Imaixory T a p' O %' ------ ---- rva oa c- W[ry NEN SHE �.,I-sting �NOK '119 u �� nasl8ll SLa 02n049B µ� a-/ CNLAgGEU_51{CLAN 1 Conditions Document 5 T -Mobile Wireless Communication Facility C. Elevations (dated: October 27, 2014) Conditions Document 6 T -Mobile Wireless Communication Facility E MIATN1 ( Planning Division CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE Application. Checklist r are' Project name Applicantfagent: All applications are required to contain one copy of the following unless otherwise noted: Applicant - Description Staff (�) Completed and sinedDevelo ment Review Application Narrative fully describing the proposed use of the property, including the following: ➢ Information on any previous approvals or requirements for the requested use (i,, applicable conditions ofapproval orDevelo memA memem) Recorded warranty deed for the subject property Affidavit of Legal Interest signed and notarized by the property owner (If owner is a corporation, submita copy of the Articles oflnco oration orother evidence to showtbat the parsonsignmil isan authorized agent Scaled vicinity map showing the location of the subject property Civil Site/Dimension Plan -1 full size copy y (folded to 8 'r/z" x II" size A photometric test report for any light fixture(s) with a maximum output of 1,800 hunens or more (see UDC 11-3A-11) Copy of the recorded plat the property lies within 8 r/z" x 11") Copy of address verification letter from Developmentp Services, See attached request form Q Site Plan—*I copy (folded to 8 %" x 11" size) Plan must have a scale no smaller than I "= 50'(1 " = 20' is preferred) and be on a standard drawing sheet, not to exceed 36"x 48" (24"x 36" is prefen-ed). A plan which cannot be drawn in its entirety on a single sheet most be drawn with appropriate match lines on hvo or more sheets Tire following items must be shown on the siteplan: • Date, scale, dimensions, north arrow, and project name (scale not tess tban Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or firm preparmg the plan • Parking stalls and drive aisles • Location and detail of bicycle parking facilities • Trash and/or recycling enclosure(s) location • Detail of trash and/or recycling enclosure (mustbe screened on 3 sides e Location and specifications for underground irrigation (Pressurized irrigation can only be waived ifyou rove no water rights exist to subject roerty) Sidewalks or pathways (ro osed and existing) Location of proposed building on lot (include dimensions to propefty tines e Fencing (proposed and existing) Calculations table including the following: D Number of parking stalls required and provided (specify handicap and compact stalls) ➢ Number of bicycle stalls required and provided ➢ Building size (sq. ft.) ➢ Lot size (sq. ft.) Setbacks Basement locations Reduction of the site plan (8 '/a" x I I") Landscape Plan — * 1 copy (folded to 8 %" x I l" size) Plan most have a scale no smaller than I " = 50'(1 " = 20.' a preferred) and be on a standard drowingsheel not to exceed 36"x 48" (24"x 36" ispreferred). Aplan which cannot be drawn in its entirety on a single sheet must be drawn with appropriate match lines on hvo or more sheets The following items must be included on the landscapeplan: Community Developmcntn Planning Division s 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Ste, 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 Fax: 208.888-6854 www.meridimmitv.ore/ulannine (0 512 112 0 1 4) 107.1 n Community Development a Planning Division a 3313. Broadway Avenue, Ste. 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 Fax: 208-888.6854 www.meridimcib, ore/olan rine • Date, scale, dimensions, north arrow, and projertimunp • Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or firm preparing the plan • Stamp/signature of a landscape architect, landscape designer, or qualified nurseryman preparing the plan • Existing natural features such as canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands, flood tains, high groundwater areas, and rock outcro rugs • Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with trunks 4 inches or greater in diameter, measured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether the tree will be retained or removed • A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be roteeted from damn e during construction • Existing and/or structures, planting areas, light poles, power poles, walls, fences, berms, parking and loading areas, vehicular drives, trash areas, sidewalks, pathways, fire hydrants, stormwater detention areas, signs, street furniture, and other man-made elements • Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper than 20% slope. Be shall be shown with one-foot contours • Sight Triangles as defined in I1-3A-5 of this ordinance • Location and labels for all proposed plants, including trees, shrubs, and groundcovers (trees must not be planted in City water or sewer easements or within five feet of fire hyd arras). Scale shown for plantmatenials shall reflect approximate mature size • A plant list that shows the plant symbol, quantity, botanical name, common name, minimum planting size and container, tree class (1, 11, or III), and comments (for spacing, staking, and installation as appropriate) • Calculations of project components to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this ordinance, including: D Width of street buffers, lineal feet of street frontage, and number of street trees ➢ Residential subdivision trees ➢ Acreage and percentage dedicated for common open space ➢ Acreage and percentage dedicated for qualified open space D Number of trees provided on common lot(s) D Mitigation for removal of existing trees • Planting and installation details as necessary to ensure conformance with all required standards • Design drawing(s) of all fencing proposed for screening purposes. Include height and material Reduction of the landscape plan (8 '/" x 11") Building elevations showing construction materials— "1 co folded to 8 %" x 1I" size Reduction of the elevations 8 %" x 11") Electronic version of the site plan, landscape plan, and building elevations in pdf format submitted on a disk with the files named with project name and plan type (i.e. site plan, landscape plan, elevations, etc.). We encourage you to submit at least one color version If applying for approval of a public school, provide additional information as required by the Public School Facilitysupplemental checklist per 67-6519 Fee (ff this project had prior approval on a site plan reduced fees may apply) For applications requiring a change of use or new construction we recommend you contact the Ada Count Highway District at 208 387-6170 to determine rm fees or rc uirements For new ublic utility construction water, sewer, reclaimed water a q applicants are re uired to submit: (2) Sets of conceptual engineering plans including pipe sizes and profiles, in a format that complies with the specifications for project Drawings found at: www.moridiancity.org/public works/autocad standards/index.as (1) Disk with electronic version of the conceptual engineering plans in the format specified above. Community Development a Planning Division a 3313. Broadway Avenue, Ste. 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 Fax: 208-888.6854 www.meridimcib, ore/olan rine (�VE IDIZ IAN, - Division ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION Type of Review Requested Certificate of Zoning Compliance Filenumber: CZC-14-102 Assigned Planner: oil .90 A< Related Files: T Applicant Information Applicantname: TERRY COX, T -MOBILE Applicant address: 121 WEST ELECTION ROAD S-330 0,,,,name: MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DIST NO 2 Owncr address: 1303E CENTRAL DR Agent name (e.g. architect, engineer, developer, representative): Firm name: Address: 121 WEST ELECTION ROAD S-330 Contact name: TERRY COX Contact address: 121 WEST ELECTION ROAD S-330 Subject Property Information Location/street address: 1789 E HERITAGE PARK LN Assessor's parcel munber(s): 82122120500 Township, range, section: 4N1 E32 Project Description Phone: zip: 84020 Email: terry.cox@t-mobile.com Phone: zip: 83642 Email: TERRY COX Phone: Fax: Fax: zip: 84020 Email: terry.cox@t-mobile.com Phone: g0'- %6-6Z$5Fax: zip: 84020 Email: terry.cox@t-mobile.com Project/ApplicationName: T -Mobile Meridian Medical Arts location Description of Work: T -Mobile would like to install a 100' Monopole for Cellular antennas, This would be a three carrier tower for co -locations. 33 E Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208)884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Websitc: www.meridaincity.org Information GENERAL DESCRIPTION Current Land Use: Hours of Operation (Days and Hours): Types of Use Proposed: PROJECT INFORMATION Site Plan Date: Landscape Plan Date: Elevations Date: Amenities Provided with this Development: Who will own and Maintain the Pressurized Irrigation System in this Development: Which Irrigation District does this Property lie Within: Primary Irrigation Source: Secondary Irrigation Source: In Flood Zone: School n/a Cell Tower Mopopole 10/21/2014 10/21/2014 10/21/2014 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No 33 E Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208)884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridaincity.org 2 ax- G O WI"V M� l aoU: (r SIK* I l L it etwor4ea. SL02049A proposed Coverage Current Design guidelines are to have in -building LTE coverage in our network. This is accomplished by building sites in existing, poor coverage areas. The proposed site would improve a large poor coverage area. ® -indoor - in vehicle - outdoor Existing Meridian Coverage LTE Coverage from New SL02049A Site - indoor - in vehicle outdoor a E m b b b b m b 9 0 m A V y m C O A v v N .0 m A m ro w d H v u m E ro w N i C H v w � u H R OH a tl m U H m G O N m m m G O m H a b x m w a m m SI x m m LI M ii m +1 0 D o m m ro u m O 0 m '-� H m 0 O m O W b E ro m G ro N C O m F m m C Gal C H m o U ri O A H H m• H i � .0 7 H a N H N M° 9 0 a a O H I ro- 0 000 NymCK �hbHm m a,c m N ,royCm E�,mor ro W � Y v W A a E� m a m A 3 7 m m y .0 F .aLro3p� ,i m m ti a"A., H'H Nyy mm p mo N O 0..Uo �W w r] Y .m O C O W m m WEN �o,oywo [) C a m m'�k�KH CaFmFE lozom Oowox axamu 1 N W � a� \�\D\III w14Ip1 �a�iw �ro ,m � F CI tEP O I p ttj OCs UL w sa O 3 Q W W W N d QZO W LL J V Om Q LL 2 p S W LL YI LL W Q- iX Fw W w O W Y.O O W w2W 2 LL WO NaOi >m 62 ¢ P~ Z� FO ZO O u V ~W } ¢O OsW SV Oz2 F.f O MH WN OF- F 2 J h UO O ([p W LL.F iLL n �N LLY.6 O O' FJ LL W Om N 6 Im•J OUS H� G.Wm 6 LLJ 0o F¢ op ¢ QQo F o N� �c <up o}C, 2Fi za o h O J V W W 2 NQ m y y W m6 F-WOWI- ¢ h CtFW f J•,•<6 J QQ ��'N� Hy P OWyN LL OW < OV arLL 7- OZI- LL W WWLL W W LLW LL w� 66 111"'U' MWp. 3 p'yj � F F�-O N LL.� O Far W h dm ¢ti pW _W �H WJ � ¢� U w F x OW v SAY n U LL O N wNav 2 U U O W yy mst ¢4 yy}}¢o virJ yw h M O W d S QQQQQQ F m W m W m F r F 3 W c, W J p N W W O 6 S m SrYY31i F LL Q S ONO aLLiLL su W 3 W 3 3 N T'J� {N� h m 6 2 O U F LL Z p C 0 m$h F o dro 'N ww -�_ zo 0 Hxp ^o F p F xS Seo F¢3 f F H wF0-i m Z o P UO N O 4 0¢ ¢¢ U M N W 0 6 g H y�W h y N z „ ^� F /- � O 111IIITYYYYYY p W m W. F Ogg N V ri W W x W W m S �Z U Y ¢ h m y�mnyyNQ W h C N w W F F W O m W 6 W W W W W m W 2 W R$ W W T J O F W 2 F m 6 F N N Q J J W W LL W O NOZ J¢ m-V6W0Wp W y -F Wf9 m¢ SW WF1- WW rh 26JW hZ20(Sj W. 2 WO W YWOLLO W WO WI-ih WLLOWpFWh Z O W 110. S O FSJ( Z" Vim `SOW¢ OUmWry WfrJW 602¢N USZO �pr-6i2-FOmJ 06mOWWOW OSmOmhO� �- � H Nh LL � mJ FOwJ W04.J 2Q 1W..W Fly WJHW S L' O -1 PN W • OUy yWg 1-hJG yd'LLF Om . S f 2m U 6 JOEdry LLZU¢yOFxN2� �x OSIL FO 6 O 6 �y •� mW N.- � ZZ H�yO ¢y0 yyOW ¢ y LL 720\yx HOy4- O Q M O LL R 6 m N U W J J� K H F x n0 F my V.-wF W J m ¢ F v p J 2 3 m N 3 h N N w -¢U^6 2 O LL V p -J �nm QmJ Q([U }Wm 6LLwU WN'JOW�q(�LL26 62 W1'V S/yV¢UUV UZ 6 I7 J¢6W �a LLOOOOSSLLWSLLZSWH2W 2qS NN ZT }'�p Z20F ..LL OF¢ -W FV¢ �ISyW2 % rJ y27 NN WLL ¢�x ROC1Q J�WW ¢ Uy1L 6 m 1 F V N N d y rp NI N VfJ q '% y 4- 2 H• ' � YI W p ~ n�o mo vzh Ivo ¢gip Qzo F o 11��,, .a < z QLLr Qom• qZ 6 .]hV iNY ¢jFw .2r'_� iFw 2~V o 2 i .n i 2 S• 5 Q>2N Y' W _Q• S a> •(¢'J 5NF 2 d rOrH¢ NW WNp Y%W WOO �~ W v6�2i Y• 0 y' > A 1-W+p SNp wN6 n J >WQ ¢ O•-N >1-W �O 6% >N% 6�2 6 ¢ nOH ¢ Q N F- OwW tJi; pWj LLV WQ -U%F VNQW¢ O W OF� pF- U y [m'l .= Otn•% Q6y ¢p6m OWO N¢0 F ~ ¢F¢"Zp 6F 6 J 2 Ilio OQO Nm2 Qn �Wy O N%Q yy y m z OM fNO7 Oy FNOU NWN %OU 4. ~ �NjF OW p � Q LL Tm ~'WLYNIh WYm WW03 WFmW WM� OAl W wOpJ• FO U j N LL YWI6 ¢N¢ LL�x LLLL•- 6W V0 W - LL 06F O6 f Q Rl NO W�LLn6 LLV LLWaLLOU LLOW N O 062 j- 01 I- m N N LLQ WWWWWWW MOM O�OW W >NOm V LL>0 0JN¢0 NW� O W 6mW I.JLL � O VWV � VW W O p 0nm0 Ns •-JNO J�WOnN � 2 6 +S W W LL V'Z U'VU �nF Nn%V An 6•-2% I- �FOF 0 NF- N �6N 2W f•-2 Z{-JN¢ }N F- V WLL, 0 J Lr J p��O�• SQLL QyQ 6aW1-6W1-FF NU y Wm � W�J�W�J LL�W¢V�� W YYO•W y O 4LL LLw wwF¢.v.¢o Q Q FLL .% F ¢CO>JJW066% • J¢LL>1'K AJJF-IL 21� • 2$0S � 20)2 p •J.• WWOYRIW LLG W2y NW20ryW-W2AVWW0Qp � ¢QN 2 22Q } �% �'-QS OLLFJN= FULL phU6LL{-U NF 6LLN•-02 W W m ¢yam¢ F OF10-¢yU F60 PO QY OOQOw OQZON\Ow 0 o 6 % ONO 2.- wwQNWi�w O wF U2F pWFFOI-w.-(�u$1 ys�d _ qn m3 o F hw1-¢ ww1--Q..w�-¢¢ww¢`LMQ WwN .2.W O n zwaOw n a m '�• >Wp0>W LL¢>WO 6>W OYWO YW OnH¢W ¢} �%O „ym5Nm0 OJT Q V¢LLZp¢UOW _6WS n¢W06p.'WxLL6LLpyW 20.Q W' p �6<Ky Z OaQV LLU WOLL6QVLLGlOJ 2 GOWN Q03 .=RimQp QNJ}pNj iN-WW W o Q=m UO QFp UO oQF �UO Uo¢6qq pM FMLL2Mm FMM¢ZxFx F 20¢04-0¢O Z'¢ FOyOF Z¢OM m W •• OV¢i2QiOi� nniQF' N1O�W Fn y020xnOWFtl N020 n(OOW FxLLxLL OLLF2LL W2 ULLp..jQ2 mW2 O 2lyLLF2W 2NQLL�Zm LLF2�6W200w NF0�0 F02000 6OOJLL aZ 6 JLL�¢OJLL%¢JLL1-¢J0IL03OWOJJw OO W2�0-1-IF OC ..Z y2j060M �F F6•• F 6o OM ¢Oy N60NW QOYY 2w ¢ ZO O W0h2%��O¢JOpW $OF¢FOW FOO U W NOe W ¢6 WhAFW WNA• WyLLF WNq• WJWx NFGMQOJ W�„ONW� U2M w VUO%UO VOW VU70%UO WQMONW NWQ WM�{NLW Wp^'WON%WO%NWFZN W0 ¢LLOF WO-. IQLOOF 0¢U � FCO%F OLLF F60gtf¢OVrKy4x.. ily LL.�SWSW 6¢N UN O%F3F-m �QLLG✓Zi¢w QQLLr2i¢QM �LLJ y P P .y w \ \ m §z ! ) ƒ•±� ( = })! { ��/\ �lvs _— — *k}/i» \I w \ \ m §z ! ' � ! ƒ•±� ( ! ��/\ w s�eO�ya' '01 0P51, A To / 'S i➢VOPA o �p (Z 133X5 3S) z O C\2 Vl p2 cs r�Wi1 g.gl N x V) d ry M O UOO= ry F- U �d F 0 =)� Q j F F 4 I =oj qU Woo � 3 OV1 S 0F¢po J, ON mow <� d NNS \m O� l� Qz0] —WW 6 ozO J — O O<� . OU~ O O O] W n ¢ w s�eO�ya' '01 0P51, A To / 'S i➢VOPA o �p (Z 133X5 3S) i� (3LVAPId) 3NV1 3O6Y3NWI15 2 p2 u0soz r�Wi1 g.gl `I x z �U ry 1 I r �E I I Q w a U �d F 0 =)� Q j N nM �hry SS mN IIV// `� o'la OVOH 3AOLO 1SMOl 'N ,SB'BS9L M .Wllc W 5 ONI8V39 30 SISV9 z 9£111 39 '46 NOO. I.G ISNIO9115 I.OJ M3LL35 6 ,60'= M ,H L,O£.00 5 3 b �o i� N Sn m 2 p2 :g r�Wi1 g.gl 6 b3i i x z �U e� C 0�0 V o�0 RV I w a U �d F 2 =)� Q j I K i(1) C7 9£111 39 '46 NOO. I.G ISNIO9115 I.OJ M3LL35 6 ,60'= M ,H L,O£.00 5 3 b �o i� Qea p2 :g r�Wi1 I z �U M a*.ml0 S 1 RV I 5n 6a I m 0 1J w 1.i a I Wt l� 6 N M . bi s� oaa OOrnz L y 9 �_� 5 o�z cvmv _ P i r d 9 Z�131nn A'— .YX C 4) m I Ills ❑m «.e w.sma p:. O i D �o Iti 2� El �YvsifXaP I I pt �/} ❑ � n€ ✓ ernlm.L� ❑ , aR co 4 o C — ✓1 N_ Iy , _ o o� �m - 0 .p>, CD_ mD OuO�r Od® a_Ra _ # N y/ $ F 14Y 11 _� on�m Qj3m3 > .Y 3 °a gLp x o y ?,gig Sos^ m_ Jul 9 K Om C 3� q Saoi 5 i z➢ 'W$12 0 p 2 ^� £ p�2b aoa Vey m i. g&M' aD; <- mSmQmpy�py4j i s3g ➢ RP°JJ -1 O m3m �n m%m Fc .. =go � ... T m -Mobiles o W . m 11 � y o i m N 2m TylO C M �r f 111 W. Election m swi 330 2 a rZl o e 4ja M I--IIIJJIII----Il V V mQ m Dm ,, UT. 0 KO (WI)616d u 2 W v W FAX (O01)316i4R0 A [ y m g X LOCUST GROVEROAD HH pIm3 M. gom �1N Aao7 F mI -'NAO CC ��cCi SDO mC O og oN z,o zap imF= l 09 z o CmA_N mA tuu�� v -Ni 07 NN I I zm I I No m Noo cx vN mn o� inN ov s%1 3� 2� hoo $i of onj N ons u. °ao h7 by ti S 0 i O ov aF n OC NN AA I b h I.� N LANE 66 NZ 9 I 0Q A �� I a P O• NI so I N y yOI NZO o1 ''/aoa� I'\ v a $ me N I 'i m o 0 G� O i ?^ ro o D Sn 02 mm I I \ r I O i to m m S m�mcn u$ T a-Moble•121 W. s ° a o O z '�• Suite a�o�ection Al m (O N d d rC (eoet�eau ^ ,2 y W A PA Eic m u Faxfeallefs-aem € a+ = 5NtC So.F Z N z Fk/SryN�ASPryA(TguO/ANf@oq�NGCOT Zm°s m � = F pNZ DAD mm a o 4�� A D 4 O 2 O O fY.S I / � 1 m z uFCFccFss ` OA0 Tamo o�m�lI m m.0�0 K.K nfm 8°r; 03oA u'. 'w u .. a<z o y0 N f 1 a' m <,->Q- y = oe nm 30 O v t m e w w O mV m z O D°m y9 P <A tiN O Z Z �Omo CA➢ O mI y Z=ZN O 0 V mini O 00 y0 A Z O m O �D ;1 Da3 :m i� c_? 1 ovy- 9K� y E ,mr, Z m� y m� ni/v3 yyyv 'd' y mN 30 mm o r y o m z c <qzz° T. m Aamz ° (n ZHm �a m9 my'z i fl zzm > n m6 o F iizm < ZE < m m z czi> m� m x r$ 9 °a°o m aa°7 yma i mm c 5 m m m zhii ~acm s go o oo n H nr Oa ^' > "a o> -mi Z oz < m °C my OT 10 f3�0 N m my�nzm OZDy �O Q C Z ~ m go N Z~ { oNmu Zm0 p2yNy 2A m 1COf 29Z2 °n°� o �'n AA '9— < yC ygyy c ream Sv o my m v >oo Pm r"m O ovoZ mp Fymg �m z z grOm ; •m•T••Mobile•_m a o i 3 N �• D 121 W. Flection M. P ab"Oz j 3m �-�y 1—I Z T A SOW mo UT. U020 �g A pp L (SM)S (eot(WI)81z FP%10o1�016-0420 x a'< 4 Z • a o _ z m w` a ITI o �OOPEOFMRK a a w e P[1Y6b[grvvM paxtl e pme.NaMpe N-nnrebapweeaMTeka. -Insplly IW elaeluxgPokvdn MMrmmleCaNewa. empak wi h rYrepv waanM b ueaM a wm�<IMNe paMaa »an a wm,enaaBa. wk¢ as aak„N�m er MeiNlanGry Mrvppakwpeaeaywe, puAaM mMe ava atle bralka¢IR oBw Wrcalers. uneuMlMwryouMxflryv NaWnYfmre, ii Beunuea pa�oltlemryowa Wdnee¢apamervM9nrat /MEHW.S WIiNiMA's RHDVIOFD Br TMOBIIEL CONNLOABLINO N TOTENNAs RWID BEDBV WILE4 soEBEDATASNEETIOF..E. POW FTFOOHfFUEWGKN LMRRONTIMEP ...M NRA . v'o0 EF SL02049B l7$9 AMMEGIGAGZM MMIOOSTHEWTAGEPMK WIE MFHIDIaN.IO a-3 A_) FOR III G �OOPEOFMRK a a w e P[1Y6b[grvvM paxtl e pme.NaMpe N-nnrebapweeaMTeka. -Insplly IW elaeluxgPokvdn MMrmmleCaNewa. empak wi h rYrepv waanM b ueaM a wm�<IMNe paMaa »an a wm,enaaBa. wk¢ as aak„N�m er MeiNlanGry Mrvppakwpeaeaywe, puAaM mMe ava atle bralka¢IR oBw Wrcalers. uneuMlMwryouMxflryv NaWnYfmre, ii Beunuea pa�oltlemryowa Wdnee¢apamervM9nrat /MEHW.S WIiNiMA's RHDVIOFD Br TMOBIIEL CONNLOABLINO N TOTENNAs RWID BEDBV WILE4 soEBEDATASNEETIOF..E. POW FTFOOHfFUEWGKN LMRRONTIMEP ...M NRA . v'o0 EF SL02049B l7$9 AMMEGIGAGZM MMIOOSTHEWTAGEPMK WIE MFHIDIaN.IO a-3 Environmental Assessment Specialists Inc. SL02049B 02/05/2015 Airspace Teres Report & AM Station Screening Client: T -Mobile West, LLC 0 Site ID: SL02049B Site Name: Meridian Medical Arts Structure Type: Monopole Coordinates: Latitude: 43° 38'22.39" N Longitude: -116° 22' 14.44" W Address: 1789 East Heritage Park Rd Meridian, ID 83646 71 SAN MARINO AVE VENTURA, CA 93003 OFFICE(819)898-4866 FAX(805)650-0949 * Federal Airways & Airspace * * * 116°-22'-14.44" * Summary Report: New Construction * Antenna Structure Airspace User: Kelly Michaels File: SL02049B Location: Meridian, ID Latitude: 430-38'-22.39" Longitude: SITE ELEVATION AMSL...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT......... 100 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...... 2710 ft. NOTICE CRITERIA FAR 77.9(a): NNR (DNE 200 ft AGL) FAR 77.9(b): NNR (DNE Notice Slope) FAR 77.9(c): NNE. (Not a Traverse Way) FAR 77.9: NNR FAR 77.9 IFR Straight -In Notice Criteria for MAN FAR 77.9: NNR FAR 77.9 IFR Straight -In Notice Criteria for BOI FAR 77.9(d): NNR (Off Airport Construction) NR = Notice Required NNR = Notice Not Required PNR = Possible Notice Required (depends upon actual IFR procedure) For new construction review Air Navigation Facilities at bottom of this report. Notice to the FAA is not required at the analyzed location and height for slope, height or Straight -In procedures. Please review the 'Air Navigation' section for notice requirements for offset IFR procedures and EMI. OBSTRUCTION STANDARDS FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE 499 ft AGL 1 FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Airport Surface FAR 77.19(a): DNE - Horizontal Surface FAR 77.19(b): DNE - Conical Surface FAR 77.19(c): DNE - Primary Surface FAR 77.19(d): DNE - Approach Surface FAR 77.19(e): DNE - Transitional Surface VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: MAN: NAMPA MUNI Type: A RD: 44458.4 RE: 2535 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. VFR Horizontal Surface: DNE VFR Conical Surface: DNE VFR Approach Slope: DNE VFR Transitional Slope: ONE VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: BOI: BOISE AIR TERMINAL/GOWEN FLD Type: A RD: 42342.23 RE: 2824.2 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. VFR Horizontal Surface: DNE VFR Conical Surface: DNE VFR Approach Slope: DNE VER Transitional Slope: DNE TERPS DEPARTURE PROCEDURE (FAA Order 8260.3, Volume 4) FAR 77.17(a)(3) Departure Surface Criteria (40:1) DNE Departure Surface MINIMUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTITUDE (MOCA) FAR 77.17(a)(4) MOCA Altitude Enroute Criteria The Maximum Height Permitted is 3000 ft AMSL PRIVATE LANDING FACILITIES FACIL DELTA ARP FAA IDENT TYP NAME ELEVATION IFR 90ID HEL ST LUKE'S MERIDIAN MEDICAL C +30 +85 BEARING RANGE To FACIL IN NM 161.35 2.63 No Impact to Private Landing Facility Structure is beyond notice limit by 10980 feet. ID31 HEL YOUNG 350.28 4.69 No Impact to Private Landing Facility Structure is beyond notice limit by 23497 feet. ID91 HEL ST ALPHONSUS -90 No Impact to Private Landing Facility .Structure 5 ft below heliport. ID58 HEL NAMPA VALLEY 125.38 5.02 +20 No Impact to Private Landing Facility Structure is beyond notice limit by 25502 feet. AIR NAVIGATION ELECTRONIC FACILITIES FAC ST DIST DELTA GRND APCH IDNT TYPE AT FREQ VECTOR (ft) ELEVA ST LOCATION ANGLE BEAR -------------- -- ------ ------ ------ ----- -- BOI LOM I 136.81 21364 +10 ID RWY IOR BOISE AIR .03 BO NDB I 35 136.66 21402 +10 ID USTIK .03 MPA NDS I 23 253.46 46500 +251 ID MERIDIAN .31 BOI RADAR Y 2820. 128.18 53091 -253 ID BOISE AIR TERMINA -.27 No Impact. This structure does not require Notice based upon EMI. The studied location is within 20 NM of a Radar facility. The calculated Radar Line -Of -Sight (LOS) distance is: 130 NM. This location and height is within the Radar Line -Of - Sight. BOI VORTAC R 113.3 123.82 56901 -166 ID BOISE -.17 CBX RADAR WXL Y 146.79 65090 -462 ID BOISE -.41 CFR Title 47, §1.30000-§1.30004 AM STUDY NOT REQUIRED: Structure is not near a FCC licensed AM station. Movement Method Proof as specified in §73.151(c) is not required. Please review 'AM Station Report' for details. Nearest AM Station: KSPD @ 8610 meters. Airspace® Summary Version 15.1.384 AIRSPACE® and TERPS® are registered ® trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace& Copyright O 1989 - 2015 C7 02-05-2015 19:13:03 El ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SPECIALISTS INC. AIRSPACE TERPS REPORT AM STATION STUDY < 71 SAN MARINO AVE VENTURA, CA 93003 • OFFICE (818) 898-4866 • FAX (805) 650-0949 Certificate of AM Regulatory Compliance Site Name SL02049B Location N43-38-22.39 W116-22-14.44 Client T -MOBILE WEST, LLC Certification Date 2/5/2015 According to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations, §1 Subpart AA. Disturbance ofAM broadcast station antenna patterns Pao §1.30000 Purpose. This rule protects the operations of AM broadcast stations from nearby tower construction that may distort the AM antenna patterns. All parties holding or applying for Commission authorizations that propose to construct or make a significant modification to an antenna tower or support structure In the Immediate vicinity of an AM antenna, or propose to install an antenna on an AM tower, are responsible for completing the analysis and notice process described In this subpart, and for taking any measures necessary to correct disturbances of the AM radiation pattern, If such disturbances occur as a result of the lower construction or modification or as a result of Ne installation of an antenna on an AM tower. In the event these processes are not completed before an antenna structure is carrom cued, any holder of or applicant for a Commission authorization is responsible for completing these processes before loreting or proposing to locate an antenna on the structure, as described in This subpart. Pan §1.30002 Tower construction or modification near AM stations. (a) Construction near a nondirectional AM station. Proponents of construction or significant modifcetion of a rawer which is within one wavelength of a nondirectional AM station, and is taller than 60 electdcel degrees at the AM frequency, must notify the AM station at least 30 days in advance of the commencement of construction. The proponent shall examine the potential impact of the construction or modification as described in paragraph (c). If the construction or motlification would distort the radiation pattern by more than 2 did, the proponent shall be responsible for the Installation and maintenance of any retuning apparatus necessary to mature proper operation of the nondireclional antenna. (b) Construction near a directional AM station. Proponents of construction or significant modification of a tower which is within the lesser of 10 wavelengths or 3 kilometers of a directional AM station, and Is taller than 36 electrical degrees at the AM frequency, must notify the AM station at least 30 days In advance of the commencoment of construction. The proponent shall examine the potential Impact of the construction or modification as described in paragraph (c). If the construction or modification would result in radiation in excess of the AM station's licensed standard pattern or augmented standard pattern values, the proponent shall be responsible for Ne installation and maintenance of any defusing apparatus necessary to resters proper operation of the directional antenna' This certificate verifies that the site at the above location has been screened and found to have no AM broadcast stations currently licensed to operate within the FCC mandated coordination distances described in the above rules. No further AM coordination actions are warranted at this time. Certified by lsirel .i ' •r ion, p,, Burn 4�perli Matt Butcher, PE 200 North Glebe Rd, Suite 1000 VP, RF Engineering and Development Arlington, VA22203 Sitesafe, Ina 703-276-1100 www.sitesaformn 02014 Sitesafe, Inc. ..20140220 * AM RADIO STATIONS * Disturbance of AM Broadcast Station Antenna Pattern * CFR Title 47, Part 1, Subpart BB * File: SL02049B LATITUDE: 430-38'-22.39" (NAD83) LONGITUDE: 1160-221-14.44" (NAD83) SITE ELEVATION AMSL...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT......... 100 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...... 2710 ft. CALL FREQ POWER ANT P DIST BEARING NAD83 NAD83 SIGN KHz Watts MOD T Meters Degrees LATITUDE LONGITUDE CITY ST ------------ --------------- -- KSPD 790 61 N T 8610 162.04 430-33'-57 1160-201- 16 BOISE ID This station has a current license. The authorized directional antenna pattern is theoretical. This station is operating a non -directional type antenna system. The electrical height of the studied antenna is: 29°. Your structure is not within 1 wavelength of this station. The wavelength for this AM station is 379 meters. The ciritcal tower height is 63 meters. CALL FREQ POWER ANT P DIST BEARING NAD83 NAD83. SIGN KHz Watts MOD T Meters Degrees LATITUDE LONGITUDE CITY ST ------------ NEW --------------- 1200 10,000 -- D T 8610 162.04 430-33'-57 1160-20'- 16 BOISE ID The status of this station is Unknown. The authorized directional antenna pattern is theoretical. 1 This station is operating a directional type antenna system. The electrical height of the studied antenna is: 44°. The studied structure is not within 2498 meters of this AM station. 10 Wavelengths = 2498 meters. CALL FREQ POWER ANT P DIST BEARING NAD83 NAD83 SIGN KHz Watts MOD T Meters Degrees LATITUDE LONGITUDE CITY ST KIDO 580 5,000 D T 9210 195.61 43°-33'-35 1160-24'- 05 NAMPA ID This station has a current license. The authorized directional antenna pattern is theoretical. This station is operating a directional type antenna system. The electrical height of the studied antenna is: 21°. The studied structure is not within 3000 meters of this AM station. 10 Wavelengths = .5169 meters. CALL FREQ POWER ANT P DIST BEARING NAD83 NAD83 SIGN KHz Watts MOD T Meters Degrees. LATITUDE LONGITUDE CITY ST KTIK 1350 5,000 D T 10537 198.17 430-32'-58 1160-241- 41 NAMPA ID KYWN 890 250 D S 10537 198.17 43°-32'-58 116°-241- 41 MERIDIAN ID KGEM 1140 10,000 D T 10797 116.41 43°-35'-47 116°-151- 03 BOISE ID KMHR 950 3,000 N T 11208 263.25 430-37'-40 1160-30'- 31 BOISE ID KFXD 630 5,000 D A 14173 166.42 430-30'-56 1160-191- 46 BOISE ID KNFL 730 15,000 D S 14173 166.42 43°-30'-56 1160-19'- 46 BOISE ID KBGN 1060 10,000 N T 15908 304.38 430-43'-13 1160-321- 01 CALDWELL ID Airspace© Version 15.1.384 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright © 1989 - 2015 2 02-05-2015 19:13:03 DEFINITIONS: SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATION: A significant modification of a tower in the immediate vicinity of an AM station is defined in CFR Title 47, Part 1.30002, as follows; (1) any change that would alter the tower's physical height by 5 electrical degrees or more at the AM frequency; or (2) in addition or replacement of one or more antennas or trnasmission lines on a tower that has been detuned or base -insulated. The addition or modification of an antenna or antenna supporting structure on a building shall be considered a construction modification subject to the analysis and notice requirements of this subpart if and only if the height of the antenna supporting structure alone exceeds the thresholds in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. CALL SIGN: The Call Sign of the station or application. For applications and construction permits which do not have Call Signs a value of 'NEW' is used. FREQUENCY: in Kilohertz POWER: The nominal power of the station, as defined in Section CFR 73.14. This is not necessarily the effective radiated power, the transmitter power, the antenna input power, etc. ANT MOD: Antenna Mode, The mode of the complete antenna system. Indicates directional or non -directional. (D = Directional and N = Non -Directional) If a station is directional at one time during a day and non -directional at another time it is considered to be directional for the purpose of Movement Method Proof. If the same station has multiple locations these are listed as separate AM stations with the same Call Sign. PT: The type of antenna pattern which has been notified to 3 (or by) foreign countries. DIST Meters: This is the calculated distance (in meters) between your proposed site and the latitude/longitude coordinates specified by the FCC data. Bearing Degrees: This is the true bearing from your proposed site to the station. LATITUDE: This is the latitude of the AM Station in NAD 1983 coordinates. LONGITUDE: This is the longitude of the AM Station in NAD 1983 coordinates. ST: This is the state where the AM Station is located. The material in this report on AM radio stations was obtained from the FCC who provided the data on an 'as -is' basis. Therefore, Federal Airways & Airspace@ disclaims all warranties with regard to the contents of these files, including their fitness for your use. In no event shall Federal Airways & Airspace® be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages whatsoever resulting from loss or use, data or profits, whether in connection with the use or performance of the contents of these files, action of contract, negligence, or other action arising out of, or in connection with the use of the contents of these files. Data conversion of the FCC data from NAD27 to NAD83 was accomplished using the USGS NADCON210 software program. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SPECIALISTS INC. AIRSPACE TERPS REPORT > ADDITIONAL < 71 SAN MARINO AVE VENTURA, CA 93003 - OFFICE (818) 898-4866 FAX (805) 650-0949 14.44" * AIRWAY ANALYSIS * FAR 77.17(a)(4) (EN ROUTE CRITERIA) * MINIMUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTITUDE (MOCA) * MINIMUM ENROUTE ALTITUDE (MEA) Airspace User: Kelly Michaels FILE: SL02049B LATITUDE: 430-381-22.39" LONGITUDE: 1160 -221 - SITE ELEVATION AMSL ...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT......... 100 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL ...... 2710 ft. FAR 77.17(a)(4) - EN ROUTE CRITERIA MINIMUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTITUDE (MOCA) LOW ALTITUDE AIRWAY AIRWAY SEQUENCE LATITUDE LONGITUDE MEA LENGTH (NM) V330 50 43-33-40.47N 116-31-36.93W 8000 14.62 V330 60 43-33-10.116N 116-11-31.674W 7000 Minimum Obstacle Clearance Altitude (MOCA) is: 8000 AMSL. Proposed structure is between the above points along Airway V330. The Abeam distance from the course centerline is 4.95 NM. The proposed structure is within the width of the secondary area of this airway. The width of the primary area is 8 NM and the width of the secondary is 2 NM. The maximum allowable height permitted by the secondary area MOCA of this airway at this location is 7738 feet AMSL. LOW ALTITUDE AIRWAY AIRWAY SEQUENCE LATITUDE LONGITUDE MEA LENGTH 1 (NM) V4 280 43-44-05.9N 116-24-53.08W 5600 14.61 V4 290 43-33-10.116N 116-11-31.674W 7000 Minimum Obstacle Clearance Altitude (MOCA) is: 5600 AMSL. Proposed structure is between the above points along Airway V4. The Abeam distance from the course centerline is 2.36 NM. The proposed structure is within the width of the primary area of this airway. The width of the primary area of this airway is 8 NM. The minimum en route altitude (MEA) for this airway segment Is 5600 feet AMSL. Any Height above 3600 feet AMSL will not be approved. Your proposed structure must remain below this value. LOW ALTITUDE AIRWAY AIRWAY SEQUENCE LATITUDE LONGITUDE MEA LENGTH (NM) V444 80 43-44-05.9N 116-24-53.08W 5600 14.61 V444 90 43-33-10.116N 116-11-31.674W 8000 Minimum Obstacle Clearance Altitude (MOCA) is: 5600 AMSL. Proposed structure is between the above points along Airway V444. The Abeam distance from the course centerline is 2.36 NM. The proposed structure is within the width of the primary area of this airway. The width of the primary area of this airway is 8 NM. The minimum en route altitude (MEA) for this airway segment Is 5600 feet AMSL. Any Height above 3600 feet AMSL will not be approved. Your proposed structure must remain below this value. LOW ALTITUDE AIRWAY AIRWAY SEQUENCE LATITUDE LONGITUDE MEA LENGTH E (NM) V500 180 43-45-32.78N 116-49-10.43W 5000 30 V500 190 43-33-10.116N 116-11-31.674W 9000 Minimum Obstacle Clearance Altitude (MOCA) is: 5000 AMSL. Proposed structure is between the above points along Airway V500. The Abeam distance from the course centerline is. 1.5 NM. The proposed structure is within the width of the primary area of this airway. The width of the primary area of this airway is 8 NM. The minimum en route altitude (MEA) for this airway segment Is 5000 feet AMSL. Any Height above 3000 feet AMSL will not be approved. Your proposed structure must remain below this value. Airspace® Version 15.1.384 AIRSPACE@ and TERPSO are registered ® trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace® Copyright © 1989 - 2015 02-05-2015 19:12:56 The mathematical algorithms used by this program are derived directly from Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77, sub -part C. 91 * COMMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN PROXIMITY OF .CASE Airspace User: Kelly Michaels FILE: SL02049B LATITUDE: 430-38'-22.39" LONGITUDE: 116°-22'- 14.44" SITE ELEVATION AMSL...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT......... 100 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...... 2710 ft. BEARING (deg) IDENT FACILITY LOCATION NAME ST Case to FAC. DISTANCE (ft) ------------- BOI ASR ID 127.21 44821 MAN AWOS-3 NAMPA ID 242.16 45039 BOI DF BOISE ID 125.05 47379 BOI ASOS BOISE ID 125.00. 47796 BOI EFAS SQUAW BUTTE ID 142.93 59471 BOI RCAG BOISE ID 142.93 59471 BOT ID 142.93 59471 CBX NEXRAD ID 146.79 65186 EUL AWOS-3 CALDWELL ID 270.8 70053 4EM RCL SQUAW BUTTE ID 356.13 135855 4EM EFAS SQUAW BUTTE ID 356.19 136048 QUL EFAS EMMETT ID 356.92 143751 QUL RCAG SQUAW BUTTE ID 356.92 143751 QUL ID 356.92 143751 QUN RCL ORCHARD ID 146.77 182720 1 ONO ASOS ONTARIO OR 309.52 219263 THE NEAREST COMMUNICATION FACILITY TO CASE COORDINATES IS: BOI Airspace® Version 15.1 AIRSPACE6 and TERPS© are registered ® trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace® Copyright © 1989 - 2015 02-05-2015 19:13:02 F. * IFR RUNWAY DEPARTURE SURFACE ANALYSIS * 14.44" FILE: SL02049B LATITUDE: 430-38'-22.39" LONGITUDE: 116°-22'- SITE ELEVATION AMSL...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT......... 100 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...... 2710 ft. An airport with at least one instrument approach procedure (IAP) will require all airport runways to be analyzed using 40:1 criteria for Departures. FAA application of the 40:1 screening criteria extendes 22.09 nautical miles and 180° semi -circle area around the Runway centerline extended. Penetration ofthe 40:1 surface will result initially in a determination of presumed hazard(DPH). An extended study is normally required to remove the DPH. A specified climb gradient (CG) greater than the standard (200 ft/nm) is sometimes necessary to allow acceptable obstacle clearance. Should the proposed location exceed the maximum height you may need to determine if there is a published climb gradient and conduct additional calculations to determine if the climb gradient will provide proper clearance for the proposed structure. Should you require additional assistance please contact Federal Airways & Airspace or another aeronautical consult to perform these calculations. Ident Dep Rwy Elev Distance 40:1 Max Hgt CG Rwy Status 1 AIRSPACE© Version 15.1.384 AIRSPACES and TERPS® are registered 0 trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace® Copyright © 1989 - 2015 02-05-2015 19:12:52 2 MAN 11 2529. 44538 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy MAN 11R 2508 45538 DNE Below DNE Proposed Rwy MAN 11T 2535 44458 DNE Below DNE Proposed Rwy BOI 28R 2830. 43525 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy BOI 28L 2824. 42342 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy BOI 27U 2922 50307 DNE Below DNE Proposed Rwy BOI 27 2922 55903 DNE Below DNE Proposed Rwy BOI 28L 2824. 42342 DNE Below DNE Proposed Rwy EUL 12 2431. 68249 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy EUL 12F 2431 68387 DNE Below DNE Proposed Rwy S78 10 2350. 88184 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy S66 13 0.0 145456 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy U98 21 3920. 152899 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 50S 12 2225. 156692 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy IU3 30 3050. 160870 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy U88 28 3120. 193830 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy S75 13 2228. 215933 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy ONO 14 2188. 216693 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 2U0 23 4965. 222010 DNE Beyond ONE Existing Rwy AIRSPACE© Version 15.1.384 AIRSPACES and TERPS® are registered 0 trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace® Copyright © 1989 - 2015 02-05-2015 19:12:52 2 22' -14.44" ********************************************* * F.A.R. 77 OBSTRUCTION ANALYSIS Airspace User: Kelly Michaels FILE: SL02049B LATITUDE: 430-38'-22..39" LONGITUDE: 116* - SITE ELEVATION AMSL ...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT......... 100 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL ...... 2710 ft. 77.17(a)(1) A height more than 499 ft. Above Ground Level (AGL). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************* THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT IS:....... 3109 ft. AMSL AMSL AMSL THE GROUND ELEVATION AT THE SITE IS:... 2610 ft. THE OVERALL CASE ELEVATION IS:......... 2710 ft. THE CASE IS BELOW THE ALLOWABLE BY:.... 399 ft. BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR MAN 77.17(x)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Location studied is further than 5.99 NM from ARP. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ MAN THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 2537 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 7.5031 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 62.234 1 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 3260 ft. AMSL 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> MAN G<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 11/29 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 29. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 59.108 degrees ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** OUTSIDE APPROACH ANGULAR CRITERIA FOR THIS RUNWAY. ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* PROPOSED RUNWAY 11R/29L 2 77.19(0) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 29L. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 59.776 degrees ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** OUTSIDE APPROACH ANGULAR CRITERIA FOR THIS RUNWAY. ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* PROPOSED RUNWAY 11T/29T 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 29T. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 59.634 degrees ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** OUTSIDE APPROACH ANGULAR CRITERIA FOR THIS RUNWAY. ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR BOI ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Location studied is further than 5.99 NM 3 from ARP. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ BOI THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 2871 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 7.8664 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 304.996 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 3557 ft. fTu6Yiil 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> BOI <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from thehorizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY IOL/28R 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10L. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 305.595 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 205.16 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 295.16 degrees THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... 7849.9 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS .................... 2830.5 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS... 43328.193 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO NB IS......... 42623.79 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS.......... 6893.562 ft. TRANSITIONAL SURFACE HEIGHT ......................... 3982.711 ft. CASE DOES NOT EXCEED TRANSITIONAL, SAFE BY.......... 1272.71 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS ......................... 7849.88 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS............ 42823.74 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10L IS: 50 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non-utility runway. It has a precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 50,000 feet with a 50:1 Slope for the first 10,000 feet and a 40:1 Slope for 40,000 feet. The obstacle approach surface is centered symmetrically along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) theprocedure will have on the E proposed structure. Precision instrument procedures will have the greatest impact between the final approach fix (FAF) and the runway end. The FAF is located approximately 5 NM from the runway end. This type of approach usually has a non -precision and a circling approach also. A circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 1OR/28L 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10R. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 306.859 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 205.15 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 295.15 degrees THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... 8551.5 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS ................... 2824.1 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS... 42146.604 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO NB IS......... 41283.12 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS.......... 6692.462 ft. 0 TRANSITIONAL SURFACE HEIGHT ......................... 4071.741 ft. CASE DOES NOT EXCEED TRANSITIONAL, SAFE BY.......... 1361.74 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS ......................... 8551.41 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS............ 41483.08 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 1OR IS: 50 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non-utility runway. It has a precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 50,000 feet with a 50:1 Slope for the first 10,000 feet and a 40:1 Slope for 40,000 feet. The obstacle approach surface is centered symmetrically along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Precision instrument procedures will have the greatest impact between the final approach fix (FAF) and the runway end. The FAF is located approximately 5 NM from the runway end. This type of approach usually has a non -precision and a circling approach also. A circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* PROPOSED RUNWAY 09U/27U 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** 7 NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 09U. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 311.384 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 205.17 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 295.17 degrees THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... 13990.4 ft THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS ................... 2922 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS... 50115.397 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO NB IS......... 48146.96 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS.......... 7472.038 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS ......................... 13990.37 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS............ 48346.91 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 09U IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non-utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway 1i exist use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* PROPOSED RUNWAY 09/27 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 09. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 309.727 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 205.2 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 295.2 degrees 13974.9 ft. THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 3955.4 feet ************************* BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* PROPOSED RUNWAY 10R/28L 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. E ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10R. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 306.859 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 205.16 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS............. 295.16 degrees THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... 8546.4 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS ................... 2824.2 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS... 42146.365 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO NB IS......... 41283.92 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS.......... 6442.582 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE IS BEYOND APPROACH SURFACE, OUT BY .............. 31283.88 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10R IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non-utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed 10 structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR EUL 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. from ARP. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Location studied is further than 5.99 NM THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ EUL THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 2432 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 11.5536 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 90.$03 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 3665 ft. AMSL 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> EUL <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** 11 NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 12/30 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 30. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 88.857 degrees ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** OUTSIDE APPROACH ANGULAR CRITERIA FOR THIS RUNWAY. ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* PROPOSED RUNWAY 30F/12F 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 30F. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 88.965 degrees ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** OUTSIDE APPROACH ANGULAR CRITERIA FOR THIS RUNWAY. ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR S78 ********************************************* 12 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Location studied is further than 5.99 NM from ARP. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ S78 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 2356 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 14.7422 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 150.251 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 3984 ft. AMSL 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> S78 <<. ************ DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN .SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** 13 NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 28. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 150.885 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 206.53 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 116.53 degrees 49522 ft. THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 22668.5 feet BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR S66 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Airport does not have a runway longer than 3200 feet. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ S66 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 2210 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 24.0457 NAUTICAL MILES DEGREES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 86.258 THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 4914 ft. 14 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 566 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 13/31 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************ DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 31. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 85.673 degrees ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** OUTSIDE APPROACH ANGULAR CRITERIA FOR THIS RUNWAY. ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR U98 ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Location studied is further than 5.99 NM 15 from ARP. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ U98 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 3920 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 25.0947 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 244.139 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 6329 ft. AMSL 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> U98 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 03/21 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 03. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 244.02 degrees 16 THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 142.86 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 232.86 degrees 30504.6 ft. THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 99817 feet BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 50S ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Airport does not have a runway longer than 3200 feet. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ 508 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 2228 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 26.0916 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 108.882 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 5119 ft. AMSL 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 508 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** 17 NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 12/30 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 30. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 108.54 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS.............. 224.64 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 134.64 degrees 69820.4 ft. THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 90550.8 feet ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR IU3 ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. m ************ DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Airport does not have a runway longer than 3200 feet. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ IU3 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 2855 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 26.5788 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 16.932 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 5412 ft. AMSL 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 1U3 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 12/30 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 19 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 12. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 17.392 degrees ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** OUTSIDE APPROACH ANGULAR CRITERIA FOR THIS RUNWAY. ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR U88 ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Location studied is further than 5.99 NM from ARP. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ U88 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION TS: .............. 3177 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 31.9559 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 216.49 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 6272 ft. AMSL 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> U88 « . ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). 20 ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 215.88 degrees ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** OUTSIDE APPROACH ANGULAR CRITERIA FOR THIS RUNWAY. ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR S75 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Airport does not have a runway longer than 3200 feet. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ S75 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 2228 ft. IN100 THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 35.7753 NAUTICAL MILES DEGREES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 139.899 THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. 21 ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 6087 ft. lr_ 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> S75 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* EXISTING RUNWAY 13/31 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 31. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 139.813 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 241.27 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 151.27 degrees 44204.3 ft. THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF 22 ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 161443.2 feet ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR ONO 77.17(a)(2) A height. AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Location studied is further than 5.99 NM from ARP. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ ONO THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 2193 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 36.0255 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 129.467 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 6112 ft. AMSL 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> ONO <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* 23 EXISTING RUNWAY 14/32 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 32. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 129.108 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 248.59 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 158.59 degrees 108021.2 ft. THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 138484.2 feet BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 2U0 ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Location studied is further than 5.99 NM from ARP. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS:........ 2U0 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 4958 ft. fi'uM THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:.. 36.9174 NAUTICAL MILES 24 THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS:........ 283.55 DEGREES THE CASE HEIGHT AGL IS: ................ 100 ft. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT ....................... 8549 ft. AMSL 77.19 (a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 2U0 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS EXISTING RUNWAY 06/23 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 06. THE BEARING TO THE CASE FROM THE THRESHOLD IS....... 283.935 degrees THE ABEAM BEARING TO THE CENTERLINE IS .............. 161.78 degrees THE CENTERLINE OUTBOUND TRUE BEARING IS ............. 251.78 degrees 118057.5 ft. THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS....... 25 ************** DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 138976.9 feet Airspace® Version 15.1.389 AIRSPACE® and TERPS® are registered ® trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace® Copyright © 1989 - 2015 02-05-2015 19:12:52 26 * FCC REGISTERED ANTENNA STRUCTURES * ******************************************* ASR Search Range - 40000 FILE: SL02049B LATITUDE: 430-38'-22.39" LONGITUDE: 1160 -22' - 14.44" SITE ELEVATION AMSL...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT......... 100 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...... 2710 ft. STRUCTURE REGISTER FILE NUM FAA STUDY NUMBER LATITUDE LONGITUDE GROUND AGL AMSL DIST DIR TOWER 1039694 A0853164 2005-ANM-1583-OE 43-38-46.58 116-20- 32.41 802.5 88 893.6 7892 72 MTOWER 1013945 A0891624 2013-ANM-2891-OE 43-39-42.79 116-21- 13.50 798.6 21 823.9 9293 29 POLE 1211475 A0436949 2002-ANM-395-OE 43-38-06.40 116-24- 33.40 784.2 45 829.9 10347 261 MTOWER 1288035 A0921195 2014-ANM-1949-OE 43-38-17.29 116-24- 39.99 783.0 38 822.0 10716 267 TOWER 1013948 A0717125 96-ANM-1119-OE 43-36-26.99 116-23- 14.00 795.5 36 832.1 12479 201 TOWER 1039673 A0466043 89-ANM-0129-OE 43-37-44.99 116-25- 18.99 782.1 121 903.1 14091 254 TOWER 1274698 A0695762 2008-ANM-239-OE 43-38-07.29 116-19- 00.18 810.7 32 842.7 14367 96 TOWER 1274697 A0695761 2008-ANM-1456-OE 43-36-22.70 116-24- 07.80 792.5 41 833.6 14710 215 TOWER 1206550 A0104381 99-ANM-1165-OE 43-36-30.70 116-20- 00.69 807.7 24 838.2 14989 139 TOWER 1269320 A0812928 2009-ANM-1194-OE 43-40-17.80 116-20- 02.59 785.1 36 824.1 15183 40 POLE 1204349 A0436947 99-ANM-0914-OE 43-35-51.49 116-21- 33.69 804.7 33 838.2 15570 169 POLE 1212049 A0436950 00-ANM-0589-OE 43-39-35.20 116-18- 50.90 810.2 15 825.4 16683 64 POLE 1234383 A0595809 2005-ANM-1957-OE 43-37-19.20 116-18- 34.17 813.2 29 843.4 17418 112 POLE 1250416 A0492887 2005-ANM-1957-OE 43-37-19.20 116-18- 34.17 813.2 30 843.4 17418 112 MTOWER 1013947 A0891630 2014-ANM-56-OE 43-37-17.59 116-18- 34.17 813.8 30 846.1 17478 112 1 TOWER 1225959 A0225669 01-ANM-0980-OE 43-35-48.59 116-18- 56.89 823.9 30 859.9 21300 137 TOWER 1267642 A0761787 2009-ANM-330-OE 43-34-51.70 116-23- 33.91 805.9 24 830.3 22120 195 MTOWER 1291665 A0895849 2014-ANM-285-OE 43-41-52.40 116-20- 25.00 797.6 33 832.6 22736 21 MTOWER 1265942 A0868509 2013-ANM-2791-OE 43-38-04.09 116-17- 06.09 819.6 18 842.1 22752 95 TOWER 1269324 A0812929 2009-ANM-1195-OE 43-36-23.29 116-17- 31.30 819.9 24 847.9 24066 120 TOWER 1210115 A0821932 2005-ANM-2055-OE 43-39-14.09 116-16- 54.58 798.7 45 846.5 24094 77 TOWER 1018416 A0022073 97-ANM-0456-OE 43-39-23.99 116-16- 57.00 796.1 37 833.2 24160 75 LTOWER 1028790 A0822539 2012-ANM-2321-OE 43-36-37.80 116-17- 14.19 820.2 30 851.0 24492 116 POLE 1287255 A0926360 2012-ANM-2846-OE 43-37-07.29 116-16- 45.41 822.6 24 848.8 25366 107 TOWER 1037799 A0044545 97-ANM-1490-OE 43-33-57.00 116-20- 17.01 823.0 80 904.4 28226 162 TOWER 1281849 A0744279 2011-ANM-1718-OE 43-35-38.59 116-16- 59.99 837.0 31 868.4 28463 126 TOWER 1061092 A0275080 98-ANM-403-OE 43-36-42.00 116-16- 01.99 823.9 35 860.5 29221 110 POLE 1211463 A0436948 00-ANM-0073-OE 43-41-27.70 116-17- 05.68 920.5 13 935.1 29448 50 POLE 1013262 A0078736 96-ANM-1223-OE 43-36-38.99 116-16- 00.01 826.0 36 862.5 29464 111 POLE 1255779 A0902261 2006-ANM-3752-OE 43-35-06.58 116-27- 17.89 812.9 29 843.4 29858 228 4TA1 1053545 A0758932 98-ANM-0590-OE 43-33-36.99 116-24- 00.99 834.8 96 931.5 29942 195 4TA2 1053546 A0758935 98-ANM-0591-OE 43-33-36.00 116-23- 55.99 836.1 83 932.5 29945 194 POLE 1203778 A0508297 99-ANM-0632-OE 43-35-25.90 116-16- 45.60 838.2 21 860.5 30076 126 4TA2 1053546 A0758935 98-ANM-0591-OE 43-33-33.99 116-23- 53.99 836.1 83 932.5 30105 194 4TA1 1053545 A0758932 98-ANM-0590-OE 43-33-33.99 116-23- 53.99 834.8 96 931.5 30105 194 4TA4 1053548 A0758945 98-ANM-0593-OE 43-33-33.99 116-23- 53.99 834.5 95 931.1 30105 194 4TA3 1053547 A0758941 98-ANM-0592-OE 43-33-33.99 116-23- 53.99 834.2 95 930.6 30105 194 4TA3 1053547 A0758941 98-ANM-0592-OE 43-33-31.99 116-23- 58.00 834.2 95 930.6 30375 195 4TA4 1053548 A0758945 98-ANM-0593-OE 43-33-31.00 116-23- 53.00 834.5 95 931.1 30382 194 TOWER 1281175 A0829067 2011-ANM-2459-OE 43-35-04.59 116-16- 22.01 839.1 36 875.1 32763 128 TOWER 1028793 A0822541 2011-ANM-1326-OE 43-35-17.29 116-16- 08.80 841.2 18 859.5 32785 125 2 TOWER 1260076 A0596195 2006-ANM-1832-OE 43-33-45 17.08 822.0 30 854.0 33273 212 TOWER 1043188 A0786603 99-ANM-1215-OE 43-32-57 41.39 829.0 113 943.3 34628 198 POLE 1286855 A0904691 2012-ANM-3217-OE 43-33-34 29.30 850.0 30 882.3 35949 144 TOWER 1275307 A0695767 2009-ANM-772-OE 43-32-41 42.99 833.0 32 865.0 37824 156 POLE 1211462 A0805119 2012-ANM-1166-OE 43-42-23 34.79 1004.6 21 1028.9 38213 50 TOWER 1245246 A0546716 2007-ANM-831-OE 43-33-34 26.91 787.3 46 834.2 40042 223 Airspace@ Version 15.1.384 09 116-26- 49 116-24- 09 116-17- 91 116-18- 80 116-15- 09 116 -28 - AIRSPACE® and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & AirspaceO Copyright © 1989 - 2015 02-05-2015 19:13:04 3 * NOS OBSTRUCTIONS NEAR CASE * Obstacle Search Range = 40000 Airspace User: Kelly Michaels FILE: SL02049B LATITUDE: 43-38-22.39 LONGITUDE: 116-22-14.44 SITE ELEVATION AMSL...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT......... 100 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...... 2710 ft. TYPE A A M FAA JULIAN V OBSTACLE CITY ST LATITUDE LONGITUDE RANGE DEG QUAN AMSL AGL L H V K NUMBER DATE A O TOWER EAGLE ID 43-38-46.59 116-20-32.44 7891 72 1 2932 0299 R 5 E M 2003ANM00741OE 2004270 C O TOWER MERIDIAN ID 43-37-44.68 116-25-19.78 14156 254 1 2709 0139 N 1 A N 2007ANM02101OE 2012117 C O TOWER BOISE ID 43-35-55.00 116-21-11.00 15636 163 3 2971 0305 U U 1976292 D 0 TOWER MERIDIAN ID 43-35-57.59 116-23-42.45 16027 204 1 2725 0106 N 5 D N 2010ANM00494OE 2014212 A 0 TOWER BOISE ID 43-37-14.00 116-18-00.00 19954 110 1 2875 0205 U M 1992265 D O TOWER BOISE ID 43-36-35.00 116-17-24.00 23972 117 1 2957 0267 U M 1980015 D O TOWER BOISE ID 43-36-55.00 116-17-08.00 24214 ill 1 2965 0275 R 3 C M 1995017 D 0 TOWER BOISE ID 43-37-57.60 116-16-35.43 25058 96 1 2754 0064 N 5 E N 2010ANM00486OE 2014206 A U TOWER BOISE ID 43-34-10.00 116-20-26.00 26772 163 1 2967 0267 U U 1985078 D 0 TOWER BOISE ID 43-33-57.00 116-20-16.00 28250 162 1 2968 0265 R 3 C U 2014152 C 0 TOWER MERIDIAN ID 43-33-32.00 116-23-31.00 29938 191 1 2963 0210 N 3 D N 2014152 C 0 TOWER MERIDIAN ID 43-33-33.00 116-23-57.00 30258 194 4 3058 0315 R 3 C M 2014152 C 0 TOWER BOISE ID 43-35-17.26 116-16-08.85 32784 125 1 2820 0060 N 1 A N 2011ANM01326OE 2011256 C 0 TOWER KUNA ID 43-32-58.00 116-24-41.00 34571 1 198 1 3098 0375 R 3 C M 1999ANM01215OE 2014152 C AIRSPACE® Version 15.1 AIRSPACE® and TERPS® are registered ® trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace© Copyright © 1989 - 2015 02-05-2015 19:13:03 DEFINITIONS: The data for each obstacle record is in the following format: Field Data Element Description ----- ------------ "0" or "U" ----------- Verification Status "O". verified "U": unverified 2 Obstacle Type 1. Arch 15. Plant 2. Balloon 16. Pole 3. Bridge 17. Rig 4. Bldg 18. Refinery 5. Bldg-Twr 19. Sign 6. Catenary 20. Spire 7. Cool TWR 21. Stack 8. Crane 22. Stacks 9. Crane T 23. Tank 10. Ctrl Twr 24. T -L Twr 11. Dam 25. Tower 12. Dome 26. Towers 13. Elevator 27. Tramway 14. Monument 28. Windmill 3 City Name City 4 State Identifier State 5 Latitude Latitude (NAD 1883) 6 Longitude Longitude (NAD 1983) 7 Range Distance from 2 Aeronautical Study HORIZONTAL VERTICAL Code Tolerance Code Tolerance 1 +-15' A 3 to NOS Obstruction (feet) 8 DEG Bearing from Aeronautical Study to NOS Obstruction (feet) 9 Freq Charted AM station Frequency 10 AMSL Above Mean Sea Level Height (Feet) 11 AGL Above Ground Level Height (Feet) 12 Strobe Indicator (L)ighting, type of "S": High Intensity White Strobe Lighting "M": Medium Intensity White Strobe Lighting "R": Red Lighting "H": Dual, Red with HIGH Intensit White Strobe "D": Dual, Red with MEDIUM Intensity White Strobe "F": Flood Lights "N": No Lights "L": Other, Lighting not listed above 13, 14 Accuracy H V A A Horizontal, Vertical Accuracy HORIZONTAL VERTICAL Code Tolerance Code Tolerance 1 +-15' A 3 0 2 +-50' B +-10' 3 +-100' C +-20' 4 +-250' D +-50' 5 +-500' E +-125' 6 +-1000' F +-250' 7 +-1/2 NM G +-500' 8 +-1M H +-1000' 9 Unknown I Unknown 15 Mark Indicator Painted/Marked Yes or No "Y" or "N" 16 FAA Study Number or NOS Source Code NOS Source Code (when FAA study number is not available) 99CF000O 7610 Form 99AM000O FCC AM List 99FM000O FCC FM List 99FC000O Flight Check 99SP0000 Stereoplot 99IP0000 IAP Procedures 99VROODO Visual Reported 99LR000O Letter Reported 99TR000O Telephone Reported 99MS0000 MSAW Reported 990CM # OC Charts 99HC000O Horizontal Ctrl Data 99LM000O Landmark for Charts 17 Action: A, C, D, Add, Change, Dismantle, Julian Date Date of Action * 0 * A revision has been made to the Julian date field by NOS in order to comp issues. The numeric, 5-digit field (YYDDD) has changed to an alphanumeric field. The new format has a distinctive letter to indicate Y2K compliance character of the Julian date (jdate) field will be a letter. The remainin will be numeric. The sequence will begin with A0001 = January 1, 2000. It with: A1001 = January 1, 2001 A2001 = January 1, 2002 A3001 = January 1, 2003 A9001 = January 1, 2009 B0001 = January 1, 2010 5 ********************************************************** * VFR - TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE ANALYSIS * 14.44" Airspace User: Kelly Michaels FILE: SL02049B LATITUDE: 430-38'-22.39" LONGITUDE: 1160 -22' - SITE ELEVATION AMSL...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT......... 100 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...... 2710 ft. Traffic Pattern Airspace, a structure that exceed any of the following maximum allowable heights is considered to constitute a hazard to air navigation: (1) The height of the transition surface (other than abeam the runway), the approach slope, the horizontal surface, and the conical surface (as applied to visual approach runways). (2) Beyond the lateral limits of the conical surface and in the climb/descent area - 350' above airport elevation or the height of part 77.17(a)(2), whichever is greater not to exceed 500' above ground level (AGL). The climb/descent area begins abeam the runway threshold being used and is the area where the pilot is either descending to land on the runway or climbing to pattern altitude after departure. (3) Beyond the lateral limits of the conical surface and NOT in the climb/descent area of any runway - 500' above Airport Elevation not to exceed 500' AGL. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier •awl 1 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VER Conical Surface. Existing Runway 11 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 29 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 11R Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 29L Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 11T Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 29T Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier ************************ EM FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway IOL Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope.. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 28R Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 1OR Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 28L Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. 2 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 09U Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 27U Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 09 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 27 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 1OR Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 28L Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier ************************ EUL FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway 12 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 30 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 30F Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Proposed Runway 12F Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier 3 S78 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet ACL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNF - Greater Than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway 10 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 28 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier S66 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet ACL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway 13 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 31 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier U98 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway 03 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 21 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier ************************ E 50S FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not. Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway 12 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope.. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 30 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier ************************ 1U3 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VER Conical Surface. Existing Runway 12 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 30 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier ************************ U88 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM, Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway 10 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 28 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ********************* Landing Facility Identifier ************************ S75 5 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway 13 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 31 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier ************************ ONO FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway 14 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 32 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ************************ Landing Facility Identifier ************************ 200 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Existing Runway 06 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. Existing Runway 23 Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Approach Slope. Does Not Exceed Runway Visual Transitional Slope. ***************************************************************** *************** * The above analysis was conducted using default parapeters - Category C R * aircraft and a maximum of 4 like category aircraft in the VFR -Traffic * Pattern at one time. * * * * To view a graphical image of VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace for these * airports use Terps® Professional Software. Open the airport and Aispace0 * study. From the Map Menu select 'VER - Traffic Pattern Airspace'. The * proposed structure, airport, and the traffic pattern will noti be shown * together. Use this information to locate an alternate site if necessary. *************** AirspaceO Version 15.1.384 Copyright © 1989 - 2015 Federal Airways & Airspace® all rights reserved Date: 02-05-2015 Time: 19:12:52 7 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SPECIALISTS INC. AIRSPACE TERPS REPORT > TERPS < 71 SAN MARINO AVE VENTURA, CA 93003 OFFICE (818) 898-4866 FAX (805) 650-0949 SkyVector: Plight Planning / Aeronautical Charts Page 1 of 1 t5U1,RiMLA66 l: (304) 0� � 3 � STACK WAGMr 27_4'8•r2'o EAGLE r 6526 (257) _o STAR 6-- ? A IR) {P�t) � 2). -A 52 O PEACEFUL COVE' � \ 8°-- / Bois 69� 28zo 6'IVIERIDAN� 18 MPAA\ .4 M IAN 42 .:�::::;r:. BOISE/GOVJEN (BOI) �Qo i)1,';:'`"'• :;' CT - 1 1:8lk1-•ATIS-123.9 290.4 5905 k• ::'..:'. 2871`100-12,2.95 � 296$ Q:::`.' ��AOE ♦` (265) >';<a` `,;,` BOISE %� c+—Ct�++ 30585 t�� SISI► LUCKY AMPAi(MAN),[ 25'-. / USTIK PEAK OS -3 6118.325; �09� g`, JK59 BO — f ,l *L 50 -1f22.7 Q 3136 s� (375)\ /P1�(290) hist NA r-2 6 Ys " (400) ° 2 oG Portions licensed by FlightPrep— US Patent 7,690,098 Copyright © 2015 SkyVector@ About Us Privacy Advertise 91 htf r•//ehvvectnt• nnm/711=44.6195527777779.-1 16370677777779&chat•t=301 &zoom -1 2/5/2015 taTxio77ZSl:�RF.1 u e�� e I I• G 11 � �.- I f1 Fedeml Airways& Airspace® AL ASSESSMENT SPECIALISTS AIRSPACE TERPS REPORT jj > TOPO MAP < 71 SAN MARINO AVE VENTURA, CA 93003 OFFICE (818) 898-4866 FAX (805) 650-0949 ACME Mapper 2.1 - 3.4 km NXNE of Meridian ID http://mapper.acme.com/711=43,6395527777778,-116.370677777778&z... 500 m I of 1 2/5/2015 7:16 PM �� I VI Alhlnlc 30 2 91 to�j- � a Imdumse Trw 31 - R '.�2 LA YERL31 •• - ..--- •• t a I i fit. ' • 1I5 rIEK__ 0 �. i USTICK ROAD••• _ xoo �u:re�: rCNA _ _ I`�{ _ 1=:Ilh �t II•' ' .Iei�M ••• I •• 1 4- DOWNEV I � , Is CAN.,e I .� e•.1,I r. TI AH '� 1,- 6-M 262i •,. c tm). �- • 7 h * I I 7 1 t a. Ill s 2650 500 m I of 1 2/5/2015 7:16 PM ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SPECIALISTS INC. AIRSPACE TERPS REPORT > TOW. 71 SAN MARINO AVE VENTURA, CA 93003 OFFICE (818) 898-4866 - FAX (805) 650-0949 TOWAIR Search Results http://wireless2.fec.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/towairResult.jsp FCC Home I Search I Updates I E -Filing I Initiatives I For Consumers I Find Peoole Antenna Structure Registration FCC > WTB > ASR > Online Systems > TOWAIR TOWAIR Determination Results ❑9 HELP 0. New Search 8 Printable Page *** NOTICE *** TOWAIR's findings are not definitive or binding, and we cannot guarantee that the data in TOWAIR are fully current and accurate. In some instances, TOWAIR may yield results that differ from application of the criteria set out in 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13. A positive finding by TOWAIR recommending notification should be given considerable weight. On the other hand, a finding by TOWAIR recommending either for or against notification is not conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR participant to exercise due diligence to determine if it must coordinate its structure with the FAA. TOWAIR is only one tool designed to assist ASR participants in exercising this due diligence, and further investigation may be necessary to determine if FAA coordination is appropriate. DETERMINATION Results Structure does not require registration. There are no airports within 8 kilometers (S miles) of the coordinates you provided. Your Specifications NAD83 Coordinates Latitude 43-38-22.3 north Longitude 116-22-14.4 west Measurements (Meters) Overall Structure Height (AGL) 30.5 Support Structure Height (AGL) NaN Site Elevation (AMSC) 795.5 Structure Type MTOWER - Monopole Tower Construction Notifications Notify Tribes and Historic Preservation Officers of your plans to build a tower. ASR Help ASR License Glossary - EAQ - Online Help - Documentation - Technical Support ASR Online TOWAIR- CORES - ASR Online Filing - Application Search - Registration Search Systems About ASR Privacy Statement - About ASR - ASR Home FCC I Wireless I UJB I CORES Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 .1) FCC Site Mau Help I Tech Support Phone: 1-877-480-3201 TTY: 1-717-338-2824 I oft 2/5/2015 7:20 PM TOWAiR Search Results http://wireless2.fcc.gov/LflsApp/AsrSearclVtowairResultjsp -u - W 2 of 2 2/5/2015 7:20 PM ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SPECIALISTS INC. AIRSPACE TERPS REPORT ) CRANE < 71 SAN MARINO AVE VENTURA, CA 93003 OFFICE (818) 898-4866 FAX(805)650-0949 Study: SL02049B-CRANE Meridian, ID Site Information Latitude: ............. 43-38-22.39 43.6395527777778 Longitude: .......... — 116-22-14.44 116.370677777778 Ground Elevation:..... 2610 feet AMSL Structure Height:..... 120 feet AGL Overall Height:....... 2730 feet AMSL Structure Type:....... Construction Crane (New Construction) City Information Nearest City:..... Meridian, ID Distance:......... 2.4 Statute Miles Direction:........ 216 Degrees (true bearing) Nearest Landing Facility Information Analyzed by Airspace on: 02-05-2015. Using AirspaceO Version 15.1.384 Nearest Public Use landing facility is: MAN: NAMPA MUNI Distance to ARP is: 45588 ft. or 7.5028 nm. Direction to ARP is: 242.23 degrees (true bearing) Distance to the nearest runway is: 44458 ft. or 7.3168 nm. DNE FAR 77.9(a). DNE FAR 77.9(b). DNE FAR 77.9 IFR Notification Criteria. DNE FAR 77.9 (EMI Navaid Notification). INFORMATION ONLY Private use landing facilities are not studied under FAR Part 77. Nearest Private Use landing facility is: 90ID: ST LUKE'S MERIDIAN MEDICAL C Distance to this facility is: 2.63 NM Direction to this facility is: 161.35 degrees. Date Printed: 02-05-2015 AIRSPACE® and TERPS® are registered ° trademarks of Federal Airways & AirspaceO Copyright 0 1989 - 2015 Federal Airways & Airspace® * Federal Airways & Airspace * * Summary Report: New Construction * * Construction Crane * **************************************************** 1160-22'-14.44" Airspace User: Kelly Michaels File: SL02049B-CRANE Location: Meridian, ID Latitude: 430-38'-22,39" Longitude: SITE ELEVATION AMSL...... 2610 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT ......... 120 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...... 2730 ft. NOTICE CRITERIA FAR 77.9(a): NNR (DNE 200 ft AGL) FAR 77.9(b): NNR (DNE Notice Slope) FAR 77.9(c): NNR (Not a Traverse Way) FAR 77.9: NNR FAR 77.9 IFR Straight -In Notice Criteria for MAN FAR 77.9: NNR FAR 77.9 IFA Straight -In Notice Criteria for BOI FAR 77.9(d): NNR (Off Airport Construction) NR = Notice Required NNR = Notice Not Required PNR = Possible Notice Required (depends upon actual IFR procedure) For new construction review Air Navigation Facilities at bottom of this report. Notice to the FAA is not required at the analyzed location and height for slope, height or Straight -In procedures. Please review the 'Air Navigation' section for notice requirements for offset IFR procedures and EMI. OBSTRUCTION STANDARDS FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE 499 ft AGL 1 FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Airport Surface FAR 77.19(a): DNE - Horizontal Surface FAR 77.19(b): DNE - Conical Surface FAR 77.19(c):. DNE - Primary Surface FAR 77.19(d): DNE - Approach Surface FAR 77.19(e): DNE - Transitional Surface VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: MAN: NAMPA MUNI Type: A RD: 44458.4 RE: 2535 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. VFR Horizontal Surface: DNE VFR Conical Surface: DNE VFR Approach Slope: DNE VFR Transitional Slope: DNE VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: BOI: BOISE AIR TERMINAL/GOWEN FLD Type: A RD: 42342.23 RE: 2824.2 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater Than 5.99 NM. VFR Horizontal Surface: DNE VFR Conical Surface: DNE VFR Approach Slope: DNE VFR Transitional Slope: DNE TERPS DEPARTURE PROCEDURE (FAA Order 8260.3, Volume 4) FAR 77.17(a)(3) Departure Surface Criteria (40:1) DNE Departure Surface MINIMUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTITUDE (MOCA) FAR 77.17(a)(4) MOCA Altitude Enroute Criteria The Maximum Height Permitted is. 3000 ft AMSL PRIVATE LANDING FACILITIES FACIL DELTA ARP FAA IDENT TYP NAME ELEVATION IFR BEARING RANGE To FACIL IN NM 90ID BEL ST LUKE'S MERIDIAN MEDICAL C 161.35 2.63 +50 No Impact to. Private Landing Facility Structure is beyond notice limit by 10980 feet. +105 ID31 HEL YOUNG 350.28 4.69 No Impact to Private Landing Facility Structure is beyond notice limit by 23497 feet. ID91 HEL ST ALPHONSUS 2 -70 No Impact to Private Landing Facility Structure 5 ft below heliport. ID58 HEL NAMPA VALLEY 125.38 5.02 +40 No Impact to Private Landing Facility Structure is beyond notice limit by 25502 feet. AIR NAVIGATION ELECTRONIC FACILITIES FAC ST DIST DELTA GRND APCH IDNT TYPE AT FREQ VECTOR (ft) ELEVA ST LOCATION ANGLE BEAR BOI LOM I 136.81 21364 +30 ID RWY 10R BOISE AIR .08 BO NDB I 35 136.66 21402 +30 ID USTIK .08 MPA NDB I 23 253.46 46500 +271 ID MERIDIAN .33 BOI RADAR Y 2820. 128.18 53091 -233 ID BOISE AIR TERMINA -.25 No Impact. This structure does not require Notice based upon EMI. The studied location is within 20 NM of a Radar facility. The calculated Radar Line -Of -Sight (LOS) distance is: 131 NM. This location and height is within the Radar Line -Of - Sight. BOI VORTAC R 113.3 123.82 56901 -146 ID BOISE -.15 CBX RADAR WXL Y 146.79 65090 -442 ID BOISE -.39 CFR Title 47, §1.30000-§1.30004 AM STUDY NOT REQUIRED: Structureis not near a FCC licensed AM station. Movement Method Proof as specified in §73.151(c) is not required. Please review 'AM .Station Report' for details. Nearest AM Station: KSPD @ 8610 meters. Airspace@ Summary Version 15.1.384 AIRSPACE® and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright O 1989 - 2015 3 02-05-2015 19:21:05