Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutChesterfield Subdivision CUPFetxuary T 7, 2004 CUP 03-070 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING February 19, 2004 APPLICANT Centennial Development, LLC ITEM NO. G REQUEST Cntd Public Hearing -Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development with requf for reduction to the minimum requirements for loi size, street frontage and front yard setbacks for patio patio homes for Chesterfield Subdivision -east of Norfh Black Cat Road and north of Wesf Franklin Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: aMaehed COMMENTS See Previous Item Packet Sir aN act d. ~~ (`CY~I~er~-s ~ ~~~~ ~~ "1 y ~ Andrea Casey, Leslie Sergeant, 8 Tom Knoll Date: ~' 1 ~'~ PlaQne: Staff Initials: \ Maferlals presented of publle meetings shall became property of the Cty of HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY n1nvOR A Good Place to Live i_izG:~L DCP;~R rnn_u7 90811GG-~»72 ~Fa~46G-1905 ( Tammy dcWeertl CITY 4F MERIDIAN . PUBLiGWOitKS <:~ryax~uciLmBnnBBKS BUILDING DBPAK-rM ~N'~~ Kei[h Bird 33 E'AS'T IDAHO (_03) 887 .'.211 -Pas 393-95_ I wuGam L v~. Nary MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Shaun Wardle (206) 888-4433 -PAX (208) 857-4813 PLANNING nND 70NI,AG ' CharVes M Rountree City Cled<Office Fax (208) 588-4215 DGPN2[ MB~r . (20$) 354-5537 ~ I~AX 888-6854 STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: February 19, 2004 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission r l~~ RECEIVED From: Wendy Kirkpatrick, AICP, Associate City Planner W FEB 17 2004 Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Tech. III City Of Meridian Re: ChestertieldSubdivision City Clerk Office • Annexation and Zoning of 46.4 Acres, by Centennial Development, LLC (!File No. AZ-03-37). • Preliminary Plat Approval ofTwo-hundred and fifteen (215) Building Lots and Thirty-four (34) Other Lots on 46.4 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone, ly Centennial Development, LLC (File No. PP-03-046). • Conditional Use Permit approval for a Planned Development consisting of Two-hundred and fifteen (215) single family detached residential building lots and thirty-four (34) common lots including four open space areas on 46.4 acres in a proposed R-8 Zone. The proposed Planned Development includes a request to allow reduced lot sizes, a request for a block which exceeds the maximum block length of 1000', reduced frontage, and reduced setbacks by Centennial Development, LLC (File No. CUP-03-070). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the IVleridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Centennial Development, LLC, has applied for the Annexation and Zoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit approval of a Planned Development consisting of 215 buildable lots and 34 common lots on 46.4 acres of land locared on Pine Street approximately 1/z mile north of W. Franklin Road and '/z mile west of Ten Mile Road. The property is currently zoned RUT, and the applicants have requested that the property be rezoned to R-8 upon annexation. >z-oa-a ~~ ~ c uv.nyo~u ; rr-u,-wo cis«~m<m s~~i,a~o~,~o, :¢ yr cur Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 2 The applicant's preliminary plat approval request is for 215 residential building lots and 34 corrunon lots. The common lots include a 1.1-acre park (which will include a playground, picnic area and volleyball court), a 1.21-acre park and two open space/drainage lots. The proposed residential lot sizes range in size from 4,980 square feet to 12,500 square feet. The applicant is proposing two types of single family lots: standard lots which range in size fi~om 5,000 square feet to 10,420 square feet and 5,000 square foot patio home lots with shared common drives. All lots will have single family detached homes. The density of the proposed subdivision is 4.61 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is requesting approval of a block which will exceed [he maximum block length of 1000' due to a change in the access point locations off of E1 Gato Street requested by Meridian's Fire Department. The plat originally submitted by the applicant featured access points off of El Gato Street which were deemed [o be too close together by Meridian's Fire Department. In order to meet the approval of the Fire Department, the applicant shifted the access points on El Gato Street resulting in access points which are now 1,300' apart; this has created a block which is 1,300' in length. The applicant is subsequently asking for approval of a block that exceeds the maximum allowed length of 1000' feet. Staff supports the applicant's request to exceed the maximum block length. The Planned Development application includes requests to allow reduced development standards including reduced setbacks (including reduced side setbacks for lots with a 5' landscape buffer and a 5' side setback and reduced front yard setbacks of 8' for patio homes from edge of pavement of shared common drive), reduced lot sizes, reduced frontages, and a block longer than 1000' in length. The following is a comparison of the City' s minimrm~ requirements and the reduced requirements that have been proposed by the applicant: Setbacks- City Requirements (R-8) Front: 15'livi ng area and side-entry garage Proposed Setbacks (single family) Front: 8' for patio homes from edge of pavement of shared common drive Street side: 20' Lot Size- City Requirements (R-8) 6,500 sq.ft. (detached) Lot Frontage- City Requirements (R-8) 65'minimum 5' of landscaping and a 5' side setback Proposed Lot Sizes 4,980 sq.ft. (detached) Proposed Frontage 49'6" minimum The applicant has proposed the following amenities to fulfill the requirement of fie Planned Development Ordinance: a micropath along the western side of Ten Mile Creek., 4.62 acres of common area (10% of gross land area) which will include playground equipment, a gazebo and picnic area, and a volleyball court in the proposed 1.1-acre and 1.21-acre parks. AZL]-03'. PP-03-046. CL'P-p}OJO Chvsierfiald Subdir[.ion AZ PP.NP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 3 The 'legal description submitted with the application appeazs to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and places the parcel contiguous to existing city limits. The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Area and essential City services are or can be made available to the subject property. CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD Centennial Development, LLC is the cun-ent property owner. LOCATION The property is located on Pine Street, approximately '/zmile north of Franklin Road and '/amile west of Ten Mile Road. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North: Castlebrook Subdivision No. 2, zoned R-8 South: Agricultural, zoned RUT. Union Pacific Rail Road tracks are located immediately to the south of the subject property (Ada County). The Comprehensive Plan designations for the properties located to the south are Industrial and High Density Residential. East: Rural residential, zoned RUT (Ada County). The Comprehensive Plan. designation for the property located to the east is Mixed Use Community. West: Rura] residential, zoned RUT (Ada County). The Comprehensive Plan designation for the property located to [he west is Medium Density Residential. ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS According Co Ordinance 11-15-ll, General Star2dards Applicable to Zoning Anaen~drnents, both the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment. " The following is the list of standards found in 11-IS-11 and analysis by staff: A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment; Staff finds that the requested zoning designation, R-8, is harmonious with and iu accordance with the effective Comprehensive Plan (`02) and the Future Land Use Map, which designates the land to be "Medium Density Residential. " PLO~A6T. NN lit!uo. ('U N!tl-Iqp ^IJ:LL'~IialJ S~hJ'wixlen AJ, I'I' flip Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 4 The Comprehensive Plan also indicates that the subject property should have a Multi Use pathway ntnning along Ten Mile Creek in the northeast corner of the subject property. Subdivisions developed to the north of Che subject property have been approved with the regional pathway located on the east side of Ten Mile Creels. Meridian's Parks Department is supportive of the regional pathway i^ this location being located on the east side of Ten Mile Creels The applicant has indicated that they w ill construct a 5' a sphalt multi-use pathway a long the west side of Ten Mile Creek. B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the future; The applicant has not indicated that they intend to rezone the subject property in the future. C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the fashion that would be allowed under the new' zoning -tor example, a residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use permits; Staff finds that the proposed single family residential subdivision would be allowed within the requested R-8 zone, if accompanied with a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development. D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; Staff finds that the land to the north of the subject property has been developed as residential subdivisions (Castlebrook Subdivision No. 2, a residential subdivision with R-8 zoning, is located directly north of the subject property) similar to the proposed subdivision. Staff finds that the requested zoning designation of R-8 is harmonious with the recently approved subdivisions adjacent to the subject property and it would be appropriate to rezone the property as requested. The Comprehensive Plan designates property to the north as Medium Density Residential, property to the east as Mixed Use Community and properties to the south as High Density Residential and Industrial. E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed use (single family residential) will be harmonious with the existing character of the area. See note D above. AZ. 09-OP. VP-03-096. CUP-03-U]0 ChmcrOdd SubJvision nL.PV CUV Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 5 F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony (oral and written) to determine whether or not the proposed uses will be disturbing or hazardous to the existing or future neighboring uses. Staff d oes n of a nticipate [hat the p roposed r esidential a ses w it l b e h azardous o r disturbing to future or existing neighbors. G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; Staff finds that the property to be annexed can be served adequately by all essential public facilities and services. Applicant shall be required to extend water and sanitary sewer mains to and through the proposed development, thereby m aking them available to the adjacent properties. Pine Street will be extended to the subject property as a part of the development of Castlebrook Subdivision. Please review agency comments regarding the subject property. H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not result in excessive additional requirements at public cost for public services and facilities. h~6astruc[ure to service the proposed planned development is in close proximity to the subject property and the subject property will be accessible off of an existing road network. The extension of Pine Street to Black Cat Road will. be required as a Condition of Approval for the proposed Chesterfield Subdivision. T. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase significantly upon build-out of the proposed subdivision; however staff does not feel that the amount generated will be detrimental to the public welfare of the city. J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; AZ.-03-03], YY-0Y046, CLV-Ill-UJO CLu~w~liclJ Suhunve~n ?J_YI' CUJ Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 6 Staff finds that the subdivision's vehicular approaches off ofPine Street will cause some degree of interference on the surrounding public streets. Please review ACRD comments concerning vehicular approaches and traffic generation. K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; The proposed subdivision will not result in the loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major imponance. The site does not contain any natural or scenic features of great importance. The site does contain a number of mature trees. The applicant should contact Meridian's Parks Department regarding these existing trees. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are removed shall be mitigated for per the Landscape Ordinance. L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest o1' the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-7992)? Staff finds services are available to the site and that the proposed subdivision complies with Meridian's Comprehensive Plan and that the annexation of this property in the best interest of the City. ANEXATION AND ZONING CONDTIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available from the Ci[y of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council s hall c onsider the objectives of this t itle a nd at I east the fallowing: a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan; Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property as Medium Density Residential and the applicant's request for R-8 zoning is consistent with the Medium Density Residential Comprehensive Plan designation. b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; AZ-0?-Ol 1, YVJIJ-046. U:P-O~-0JO Chuula~uld Subdlvis lon AL. PY Q1N Plamiing & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 7 Staff finds that public services can be made available to accommodate the proposed development. See Annexation and Zoning Comments G and H. c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program; Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds, the applicant will extend urban services to the subject property Crum existing main lines, and the extension of Pine Street will be constructed as a pact of the Casllebrook No. 2 Subdivision. d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services; the applicant will pay for the constniction of extending services to the subject property. e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the Commission's attention. Staff finds that the proposed development will not present any health, safety or environmental problems that would need to be brrought to the Council or Commission's attention. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Parl: Drainage Areas: The four proposed open space areas all feature drainage areas. In order Cor these open space areas to be counted towards the 10°io open space requirement for Che subdivision drainage ponds in these areas must be dry ponds. Reduced Lot and Setback Requirements: The reduced lot dimensions of 5,000 square feet and the proposed reduced front yard and side yard setbacks within the proposed subdivision are less than those required by the current Zoning Ordinance and would not be permitted without the applicant's request for a Planned Development. Staff supports the requested reduced setbacks and lot d imensions; t he r esulting s maller 1 of s izes a nd p roposed p atio h owes w ith s hared c onunon drives will help to increase the diversity of Meridian's housing choices. Shared Common Drives: The smaller patio home lots located in the southern portion of the subdivision share common driveways. The proposed configuration features a series of four patio home lots (5,000 square foot lots) which are accessed by a shared comtnon drive. Staff is supportive of the proposed configuration for the patio lots and the diversity of housing types which the applicant is proposing. The recently approved Berkeley Square subdivision featured a similar configuration with a series of six small lots sharing a common drive, staff feels that the proposed design for Chesterfield is superior to the approved design for Berkeley Square. However, staff recommends that the applicant design the proposed shared drivewavs to resemble a private road rather than a standard driveway (i.e., a curb return rather than a rolled curb.) AZ-0]-057. VP-03-096, CUP-05-0]0 Cho'mricld Settlrvielan A].PV.N P Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 8 Pine Street Extension: The subject property is currently land locked. Pine Street will be extended to Black Cat Road during the constriction of the Castlebrook No. 2 Subdivision. Staff is recommending that the Final Plat for Chesterfield not be signed until the Pine Street extension to Black Cat Road is completed. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS /PRELIMINARY PLAT Water service to this site shall be via main line extensions from the existing mains adjacent to the property. The applicant shall be required to extend water mains to anal through the proposed development, thereby malting them available to Che adjacent properties (including stub streets and El Gato Road.). Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide servtce. 2. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via main line extensions fo an existing temporary lift station within the Blackstone Subdivision. This lift station pumps to an existing gravity sewer main located in Black Cat Road, that then flows to the Ashford Greens lift station. The Blackstone lift station shall be upgraded or modified, at this developers expense, to the City of Meridian's standards and specifications. The applicant will be responsible to construct lateral sewer mains to and through this proposed development including and in coordination with the City's Black Cat Trunk Project. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. This development shall be subject to the Ashford Greens sewer latecomers fees. Black Cat trunk development fee of $1,500.00 per dwelling unit shall also be assessed against this development. Payment of the trunk development fees and latecomer fees are required prior to signature on the final plat map by the City Engineer. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 3. The final plat for Chesterfield Subdivision will not be signed until the extension of Pine Street to Blacl< Cat Road has been completed. 4. The applicant has not definitively indicated who will own and maintain the pressurized in~igation system within this development. If the pressurized ,irrigation system within this development is to remain a private Homeowners Association system, complete plans and specifications shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process. A draft copy of the pressurized in igation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridia^ requires that pressurized irrigation systems besupplied by ayear-round source of water. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 5. A detailed fencing plan shall be submitted upon application for the final plat. A solid AZ~13-n'39, PY-0}OGb, CG0.03-0JO Chesierneld Snbd{vis'ion AZYP CUV Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 9 fence shall be required around the perimeter of the subdivision unless the City agrees in writing that such a fence is not required. Fencing for the side yards of patio lots bordering Kaspell Sn-eet and all patio lots bordering common areas shall be 4' in height and made of a semi-solid material. Fencing adjacent to the proposed pain shall be 4' in height (to increase the visibility of the park) and depicted in the fencing plan. This shall he an on- going condition of approval. 6. Submit a detailed landscaping depicting the playground equipment to be added to the proposed parks and a detailed plan for the proposed storm drain ponds. 7. Add or revise the fallowing preliminary plat notes: •Add a note to the face of the plat that restricts fencing adjacent to the pathways within the subdivision to being no greater than four feet in height if solid sight-obscuring material is used for fence construction. 8. Ten (10) copies of a revised plat shall be submitted to the City Clerk's Office at least ten days prior to the next public hearing for this plat. 9. The applicant has not indicated whether the project is to be phased. If this project is to be phased, revise the plat to indicate phase lines. 10. Place a note on the plat that references the FEMA flood plain boundary adjacent to the Ten Mile Creek. Note restrictions associated with the flood zone on the face of the preliminary plat 11. Please submit all updated groundwater/soils monitoring data to the Public Works Department for review. The preliminary geotechnical evaluation, as prepared by Geo Engineers, indicates that shallow groundwater may be a factor, particularly in the areas of Test pits #1 and #5, where groundwater is assumed to be at a depth on the order of 3-3 1/2 feet. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storms up to and including a 100-year storm event (All areas being counted toward the 10% open space amenity shall be free of "wet ponds" or other such nuisances.) Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil. type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minim~ml of 3-feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above groundwater. GENERAL COMMENTS Please submit a copy of the Ada County SCreet Name Committee's approval letter 'for the subdivision name, and the lot and block numbering. Mahe any corrections necessary to conform. AZ~03-03], PP-03-096, CUP-03-OID Chesmi 17c1d Sulxllvlsion AZ PCCUP Plaiming & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 10 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, p lay equipment, p ressurized i rrigation, s anitary s ewer, water, e tc., p rior t o signature on the final plat. 4. All micro-paths within the proposed subdivision shall be designed in accordance with MCC 12-13-15 "Micropath Landscaping". 5. A detailed landscape plan, depicting changes made to the plat since the initial submittal of the project and in compliance with the landscape ordinance shall be submitted for the subdivision with the final plat application. 6. Sidewalks within the proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC72-13 10-8. 7. 100-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 8. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owner's), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Deparhnent. if lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 9. Contact Meridian's Parks Department regarding the existing matures trees, on the subject property. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed. 10. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. l 1. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells maybe used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 12. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered back511, where footing would sit atop 511 material.. ~L~n!.U 12 YY-OI-OYO, CUY-03-U~0 Chee:ui GaW Snbdivixlon ALPV,I UN Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Pagel 1 13. Contact Sanitary Services Company regarding the location of trash receptacles in the subdivision. STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve. a conditional use permit if they shall find evidence presented at The hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3): A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by this ordinance; Staff finds that the subject property is large enough to accomrodate the proposed subdivision and all required subdivision features including amenities required by the Planned Development application. B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance; The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as "Medium Density Residential." Staff finds that the proposed residential uses are harmonious wide and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. The project is being proposed as a conditional use for a planned development in order to allow reduced lot sizes, reduced street frontages, a block exceeding the maximum block length of 1000' and reduced setbacks. If the project is approved as a Planned Development, it will meet the minimum requirements of the MCC. C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed residential subdivision use will be harmonious with the intended and existing character of the area. The proposed development is located immediately south of Castlebrool< Subdivision No. 2, another residential subdivision with R-8 zoning and the Comprehensive Plan designates property to the north and west as Medium Density Residential, to the east as Mixed lise Community, and property immediately to the south as High Density Residential and Industrial. D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity; .wm-rai. Nrl~yoae, cur-m-o~o ci~,~mmem s~dnr~~-~, ~o~~ nz.rr cur Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 12 Staff does not anticipate that the proposed project will have an adverse impact on other properties within the vicinity; however, the Commission and Council should consider any testimony (written and oral) presented at the public hearings before malting this finding. E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; Staff finds that the proposed development will be adequately served by the essential public facilities and services listed above. See Annexation and Zoning Comments G and K. F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic rvelt'are of the community; Staff finds that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; the applicant will be responsible for the costs of extending existing sewer and water mains to the subject property and Pine Street will be extended as a part of the Castlebrook development. C. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipmenC, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff finds that there will be an increase in traffic and noise in the general vicinity if the subdivision is approved, but that approval of the subdivision will not lead to a major increase in smoke, fumes, glare, odors or other disturbances that will be considered detrimental to the welfare of the City and the subdivision's neighbors. H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Based on the ACHD staff report, staff finds that the proposed vehicular approaches are sufficient such that the development will not create significant interference with any traffic an the surrounding public streets. ACHD has not indicated that there are any significant traffic issues facing the proposed project. Please review the ACHD report for this project for additional information regarding this finding. I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. nz.ui-e ~~, rx-o~-wa. cua-m-nn; Cna~~.~~ rdd s~r:,d~,"~~~,~~ n;. rr a:r Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 13 Staff finds that the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. Staff finds that there are no such features on the subject property. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Conditional Use Permit) Applicant shall meet all of the requirements of the preliminary plat as a condition of the Conditional Use Permit. 2. All development shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: (from Chapter VI and VII) • "Large development proposals that are likely to generate significant traffic should be assessed for their impact on the transportation system and sun~ounding land uses. They should be examined for ways to encourage all forms of transportation such as transit, walking, and cycling. • New development should not rely on cul-de-sacs since they provide poor fire access, walkability, and neighborhood social life. Ivew development and streets should he designed to encourage walking and bicycling. • Pathways that encourage use by bicyclists and pedestrians can decrease road congestion and add to the community's quality of life. The proposed off-street and multiple-use pathway systems are depicted in Figures VI-3 and VI-4. New and existing developments should ensure that the guidelines laid out in this plan are adopted. • Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes and multi-family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling traits for all income groups in a variety of location suitable for residential development. OTHER AGENCY/ DEPARTMENT COMMENTS & CONDITIONS SANI"rARY SERVICES COMPANY (SSC) Contact SSC regarding location of receptacles for patio lots. MERIDIAN' FIRE DEP.ARTIDtENT One and two family dwellings will require afire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute available for duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. hitemational Fire Code Appendix D 2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department. iA7-0]-037, YVaA~Oi(.. CU P-O1-010 Chaier9elJ Subdivision ALVY CUV Planning & Zoning CommissionLMayor & City Council Page 14 3. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 '/~" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Wor]<s spec. d. Locatioivs with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of the hydrant location. e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers. f Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. 4. The phasing plan may require that any roadway greater than 150' in length that is not provided with an outlet shall be required to have an approved turn around. 5. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside. 6. Insure that all yet undeveloped parcels are maintained free of combustible vegetation. 7. Operational fire hydrants and Cetnporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction begins. 8. A minimum of two points of access will be required for any portion of the project, which serves more than 50 homes. This shall be measured off of the center line of the street. 9. Building setbacks shall be per the Building Code for one and two story construction. ] 0. The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway Standards and shall have a clear driving surface, available at all times, which is 20' wide. Streets with less than a 29' street width shall have no parking. Streets with less than 33' shall have parking only on one side. 11. Fire lanes and streets shall have a vertical clearance of 13'6". This includes mature landscaping. 12. The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal. Achievement of this goal is subject Co budgetary constraints and is intended to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic Life Support. The budget constraints are typically defined as capita] outlay for facilities that are located within 1.~ miles from a given location and sufficient operational funds to staff the facilities. 13. The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of die development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer RECOMMENDATION AZAI-037, PP-0I~OY6. CUP-03~0~0 CnumrLcid SuhJlrGmu AL.4'V OUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Page 15 Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation/rezone, preliminary plat, and conditional use permit with the aforementioned findings and conditions. i~L'a}_m%. PI'~~'_~wn. CLP-OYOIp CLcaerFcld SuM1dlvi,a Ion AL YP CUN RECEIVED DEB - 6 2004 February 4, 2004 Qp3ty of Meridian City Clerk Optics Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission This letter is concerning the Chesterfield Subdivision. These 46.40 acres are surrounded by people with 5 + acres. We have all been here a long time and value our quality of life. Therefore, we feel that going from RUT to R-8 is unreasonable. We feel that the maximum size lots of 80 feet instead of 50 feet would be the best choice. It would be a much nicer looking neighborhood and less.congested. -- The proposed 2131ots would bring a minimum of 426 cars onto Blackcat, a two lane road in bad repair. Add that to the two other subdivisions going in below this one and we'll have way too much traffic. We need turn lanes going into these subdivisions so traffic won't back up more than necessary. Our property is on the railroad tracks bordering a triangle of land that they want to put 8 houses on. I would like to see a berm with a 6 foot fence on top so people won't be staring in our back yard. Also to keep people from trespassing on private property. We also need to have access to the imgation ditch so we will need 2 gates that we can lock. We need one at the irrigation ditch and one going from our property to get to the irrigation ditch. There is some bare:~xQUrid up by the irrigation ditch and we are concerned that the people will park their boats, Motor homes, trailers, ect. up there. Could we keep that landscaped so that wouldn't happen? I think these are reasonable requests and hope you will consider them carefully. Sincerely, Garey and Andrea Casey 4631 Quarterhorse Lane Meridian ID 83642 888-1213 RECF~VED FEB f 3 2004 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Meridian Mayor, Tammy De Weerd 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 deweerdt@meridiancity. org Re: Proposed Chesterfield Subdivision Road Outlet Dear Mayor De Weerd, February 9, 2004 Leslie L. Sergeant 5947 W. El Gato Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 llsarg~homeinternet net Please consider the 30-year old EI Gato Lane neighborhood that will be significantly affected by the proposed eventual extension of Pine Avenue west from 10 Mile Road to ,Black Cat Road and directly through to El Gato Lane. Urban development may be inevitable however, please recognize the quality of the existence of the rural El Gato Lane neighborhood. If the proposed Chesterfield subdivision must be built, please off-set this subdivision road outlet onto Black Cat so that the outlet does not feed directly into EI Gato Lane. The off- set will not affect the sale of houses in the proposed subdivision but it will reduce the number of cars that drive down El Gato Lane. Families who buy homes in the proposed subdivision will also benefit considerably from reduced traffic. Ideally, the Chesterfield subdivision outlet onto Black Cat is best placed along the Kennedy Lateral Irrigation Ditch for 2 reasons: 1. It provides the off-set away from El Gato Lane and, 2. The visibility of oncoming Black Cat traffic is much improved and therefore safer as an outlet from the Chesterfield subdivision. Traffic visibility from El Gato Lane is limited due to a gentle rise in the landscape, which peaks to the north near the Kennedy Lateral Irrigation Ditch on Black Cat. We can all benefit from significant safety measures and appropriate traffic planning that allow the family-oriented quality of life that we all ultimately seek. This El Gato neighborhood is a very quiet, mile-long road of 5-acre subdivisions having neighborhood children and adults riding their bicycles, walking their dogs and riding their horses -even after dark. During the Holidays, neighbors drive their horse-drawn carriage down the road with sleighbells. My husband, delivered candy canes on Christmas Eve to the kids in the neighborhood by horseback with sleighbells. We do not want to lose this valuable part of our family-oriented El Gato Community. I might add that, the newly-established St. James subdivision at the west end of El Gato Lane, at the county line (McDermott), is also 5-acre parcels. Additional traffic would significantly impact the ability of the El Gato neighborhood to enjoy our quality of life -which we should also be able and entitled to enjoy. Pine Avenue cannot be extended much further west anyway so why not let Pine Avenue stop at Black Cat, off-set from El Gato Lane, so that that Meridian's quality of life can be shared by all of us. I ask that the developers of the proposed Chesterfield subdivision form a road outlet onto Black Cat Road that does not flow directly onto El Gato Lane. This can be awin-win solution that will benefit us all-the residents of the El Gato neighborhood, the future residents of the proposed Chesterfield subdivision, and the citizens of Ada County and Meridian. With Sincere Regards, .i/ / r% Leslie L. Sergeant cc: Meridian Planning and Zoning ACRD Tara Green From: Kristy Vigll [vigilk~meridiancity.oig] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 8:01 AM To: Wendy Kirkpatrick; Anna Powell; Jessica Johnson; Jolene. Robles; Tara Green Subject: FW: RFCIEIVEI~ ICristy vigil Administrative Assistant Meridian Planning & Zoning 208-884-5533 ----Original Message---- From: Leslie Sargennt [mailto:Ilsorge~homeinternet.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 9:26 AM To: vigilkCmeridioncity.org Subject: February 9, 2004 Leslie L. Sargeant 5447 W. EI Gato Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 <moi Ito:llsarge@homeinternet.net>I Isarge~homeinternet.net Meridian Plonnirg and Zoning 660 East Watertower, Suite 202 Meridian, Idaho 83642 vigilkC meridiancity.org Dear Meridian Planning and Zoning, Please consider the 30-year old EI Gato Lane neighborhood thnt will be significantly affected by the proposed eventual extension of Pine Avenue west from 10 Mile Rand to Blnck Cat Road and directly through to EI 6ato Lane. Urban development may be inevitable however, please recognize the quality of the existence of the rural EI Gato Lone neighborhood. If the proposed Chesterfield subdivision muss' be built, please off-set this subdivision road outlet onto 81nck Cnt so that the outlet does not feed directly into EI Gato Lane. The off-set will not affect the sale of houses in the proposed subdivision but it will reduce the number of cars that drive dawn EI 6ato Lane. Families who buy homes in the proposed subdivision. will also benefit considerably from reduced troffic. FF~ 1 ? 2004 City Of Meridian (`,itp Clerk Office Ideally, the Chesterfield subdivision outlet onto Black Cot is best placed along the Kennedy Laternl Irrigation Ditch for 2 reasons: * It provides the off-set away from EI Gato Lane and, * The visibility of oncoming Black Cat traffic is much improved and Therefore saftr as on outlet from The Chesterfield subdivision. Traffic visibility from EI 6ato Lane is limited due to n gentle rise in the landscape, which peaks to the north near the Kennedy Lateral Irrigation Ditch on Black Cat. We con all benefit from significant snfety measures and appropriate traffic planning that allow the family-oriented quality of life that we all ul#imately seek. This EI 6ato neighborhood is a very quiet, mile-lo-g road of 5-acre subdivisions having neighborhood children and adults riding their bicycles, walking their dogs and riding their horses -even nfter dark. I might add that, the newly-established St. Jamts subdivision at the west end of EI Gato Lane, at the county line (McDermott), is also 5-acre parcels. Additional traffic would significantly impact the ability of the EI Gato neighborhood to enjoy our quality of life -which we should also be able and entitled to enjoy. Pine Avenue cannot be extended much further west orryway so why not let Pine Avenue stop of Block Cat, off-set from EI Gato Lane, so that that Meridian's quality of life con be shared by all of us. I ask that the de~lopers of the proposed Chesterfield subdivision form a rogd outlet onto Black Cat Road that does not flow directly onto EI 6ato Lone. This can be a win-win solution that will benefit us all -the residents of the EI Gato neighborhood, the future residents of the proposed Chesterfield subdivision, and the citizens of Ada County and Meridian. With Sincere Regards, Leslie L. Sergeant ce: ACHD Meridian Mayor Tammy DeWeerd From: Tammy de Weerd Sent: Wednesday, Febn:ary 11,2004 2:17 PM FEB 1 1 2~4 To: 'Leslie Sargeanf Cc: Jessica Johnson; Tara Green; W[II Berg City of Meridian Subject: RE: Cheste~eld Subdivision City Clerk Office Thank you for your comments regarding the Chesterfield Subdivision application. I will forward them on to our City Clerk`s office to be included in the material prepared for this application`s public hearing. I understand that this application is currently in front of our Planning and Zoning Con¢nission. Your comments will be available to the Commissioners as well as the City Councilman. Thanks again for your comments. Sincerely, Tammy de Weerd, Mayor City of Meridian -----Original Message----- From: Leslie Sargeant [mailto:llsarge@homeinternet.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 10:23 AM To: Tammy de Weerd Subject: Chesterfield Subdivision February 9, 2004 Leslie L. Sargeant 5947 W. El Gato Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 <mailto:llsarge@homeinternet.net>llsarge@homeinternet.net Meridian Mayor, Taimny De Weerd 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 deweerdt@meridiancity.org Re: Chesterfield Subdivision Outlet Road Dear Mayor De Weerd, Please consider the 30-year old E1 Gato Lane neighborhood that will be significantly affected by the proposed eventual extension of Pine Avenue west from 10 Mile Road to Black Cat Road and directly through to E1 Gato Lane. Urban development may be inevitable however, please recognize the quality of the existence of the rural E1 Gato Lane neighborhood.. if the proposed Chesterfield subdivision must be built, please off-set this subdivision road outlet onto Black Cat so that the outlet does not feed directly into El Gato Lane. The off-set will not affect the sale of houses in the proposed subdivision but it will reduce the number of cars that drive down E1 Gato Lane. Families who buy homes in the proposed subdivision will also benefit considerably from reduced traffic. Ideally, the Chesterfield subdivision outlet onto Black Cat is best placed along the Kennedy Lateral Irrigation Ditch for 2 reasons: * It provides the off-set away from El Gato Lane and, * The visibility of oncoming Black Cat traffic is much improved and therefore safer as an outlet from the Chesterfield subdivision. Traffic visibility from E1 Gato Lane is limited due to a gentle rise in the landscape, which peaks to the north near the Kennedy Lateral Irrigation Ditch on Black Cat. We can all benefit from significant safety measures and appropriate traffic planning that allow the family-oriented quality of life that we all ultimately seek. This E1 Gato neighborhood is a very quiet, mile-long road of 5-acre subdivisions having neighborhood children and adults riding their bicycles, walking their dogs and riding their horses - even after dark. During the Holidays, neighbors drive their horse-drawn carriage down the road with sleighbells. My husband deliverered candy canes on Christmas Eve to the kids in the neighborhood by horseback with sleighbells. We do not want to lose this valuable part of our family-oriented E1 Gato Community. I might add that, the newly-established St. James subdivision at the west end of E1 Gato Lane, at the county line (McDermott), is also 5-acre parcels. Additional traffic would significantly impact the ability of the El Gato neighborhood to enjoy our quality of life - which we should also be able and entitled to enjoy. Pine Avenue cannot be extended much further west anyway so why not let Pine Avenue stop at Black Cat, off-set from E1 Gato Lane, so that that Meridian's quality of life can be shared by all of us. I ask that the developers of the proposed Chesterfield subdivision form a road outlet onto Black Cat Road that does not flow directly onto El Gato Lane. This can be a win-win solution that will benefit us all - the residents of the E1 Gato neighbonc~od, the future residents of the proposed Chesterfield subdivision, and the citizens of Ada County and Meridian. With Sincere Regards, Leslie L. Sargeant cc: Meridian Planning and Zoning ACHD February 9, 2004 Leslie L. Sargeant 5947 W. El Gato Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 llsarFe~na.homeinternet.net Meridian Planning and Zoning 660 East Watertower, Suite 202 Meridian, Idaho 83642 vi ilk ,_eridiancity.org Re: Proposed Chesterfield Subdivision Road flatlet Dear Planning and Zoning, R,EcEr~ FEB 122004 CITY OF MEIt1DIAld PLANNING 8c ZCYN'I1v~.: Please consider the 30-year old El Gato bane neighborhood that will be significantly affected by the proposed eventual extension of Pine Avemte west from 10 IvTile Road to Black Cat Road and directly through to El Gato Lane. Urban developmern may be inevitable however, please recognize the quality. of the existence of the. rural El Gato Lane neighborhood. If the proposed Che~erfield subdivision must be built, please. off-set this subdivision road outlet onto Black Cat so that.the outlet does not feed directly into. El Gato Lane. ,The off- set will not affect the sale of houses in the proposed subdivision but it will reduce the number of cars that drive down El Gato Lane. Families who buy homes in the proposed subdivision will also benefit considerably from reduced traffic. Ideally, the Chesterfield subdivision outlet onto Black Cat is best placed along the Kennedy Lateral Irrigation Ditch for 2 reasons: 1. It provides the off-set away from El Gato Lane and, 2. The visibility of oncoming Black Cat traffic is much improved and therefore safer as an outlet from the Chesterfield subdivision. Traffic visibility from El Gato Lane is limited due to a gentle rise in the landscape, which peaks to the north near the Kennedy Lateral Irrigation Ditch on Black Cat. We can all benefit from significant safety measures and appropriate traffic planning that allow the family-oriented quality of life that we all ultimately seek. This EI Gato neighborhood is a very quiet, mile-long road of 5-acre subdivisions having neighborhood children and adults riding their bicycles, walking their dogs and riding their horses - evemafter dark: During the Holidays, neighbors drive their horse-drawn . , carriage down the road with sleighbells. My husband, delivered candy canes on Christmas Eve to the kids in the neighborhood by horseback with sleighbells. We do not want.. to lose this valuable part of our family-oriented El Gato Community._ I might add that, the newly-established St. James subdivision at the west end of EI Gato Lane, at the county line (McDermott), is a(so 5-acre parcels. Additional traffic would significantly impact the abihty of the El Gato neighborhood to enjoy our quality of life -which we should also be able and entitled to enjoy. Pine Avenue cannot be extended much fiuther west anyway so why not let Pine Avenue stop at Black Cat, off-set from El Gato Lane, so that that Meridian's quality of life can be shared by all of us. I ask that the developers of the proposed Chesterfield subdivision form a road outlet onto Black Cat Road that does not flow directly onto El Gato Lane. This can be a win-win solution that will benefit us all -the residents of the El Gato neighborhood, the future residents of the proposed Chesterfield subdivision, and the citizens of Ada County and Meridian. With Sincere Regards, ~G2 " Y Lesli . Sargeant cc: Meridian Mayor Tammy De Weerd ACRD Tara Green From: Kristy Vgil [vigitk~meridiancity.org] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 8:01 AM To: Jessica Johnson; Jolene Robles; Tara Green Subject: FW: Chesterfield Subdivision ,~;~~EI~EL F r~ 1 2 2004 Kristy Vigil Administrative ASSistnM Meridinn Planning 6 Zoning 208-884-5533 -----Original Message---- From: Tom Noll [mailto:tomnoll@velocitus.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 9:16 AM To: atunirg@achd.ada.id.us Cc: vigilk~meridioncity.org Subject: Chesterfield Subdivision Ms Andrea Tuning: I am a resident living on EI 6oto Lane and I rend your report regarding the proposed Chesterfield subdivision: http://achd.ada.id.us/pdf/staff_reports/128/Chesterfield5ubdivision.pdf I did not see arty analysis of the traffic impact on EI Gato Lane west of 81ack Cat Rood. Wos that analysis not done or was it completed and not included in the report? What will be the traffic impost on EI Gato Lane? I've talked with nearly all of the EI 6nto Lane residents and we are all very concerned about this proposed subdivision inereasirg traffic on EI Gato Lane. As presently constructed, EI Gato Lane fails to meet the design requirements of a residential collector, and probably cannot be redesigned to meet the residerrtial collector design specifications. What plans does ACHD have to mitigate the negative impacts of increased traffic on EI 6ato Lane? Thank you, Tom Noll 5947 EI Gato Lnne Meridinn, Idaho 83642 ZOS-388-2623 City Of Meridian. City Clerk Office CITY OF MERIDIA4N PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET DATE February 19, 2004 ITEM # 6 PROJECT NUMBER CUP 03-070 PROJECT NAME Chesterfield Subdivision NAME PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL February 2, 2004 CUP 03-070 MERIDIAN PLANNING ii<ZONING MEETING February 5, 2004 APPLICANT Centennial Development, LLC ITEM NO. ~ O REQUEST Public Hearing -Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development with request for reduction to the minimum requirements for lot s¢e, street frontage and front yard setbacks for patio patio homes for Chesterfield Subdivision -east of North Black Caf Road and north of West Franklin Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: S attached letter of COMMENTS No Comment No Comment See attached Comments See attached Comments ~~~~ ~ ~~~ . ~~1 ~ ~~v~ Contacted: Date: - Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meddlan. LRND CONSULTRNTS INC 52 N. 2nd Stteet Eagle, Idaho 83616 Office - 208-938-3812 Fax - 206-938-5873 Email: shawa@laadconculraztts.aet RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2004 City Of 1VIeridian. City Clerk Office To: Meridian City Clarks Office Frorre Shawn L. Nickel Fax: 888.4218 Pages: 2 { includ'mg cover page) Plwrre: 208 936 5873 P.01i02 ~rit~. ~'.O11S111~ritS 117.C . Date: 124/2004 Re: Postponement of Public Hearing for Ce: Wendy K. -Meridian P8Z Dept. Chestefield Subdivision ®Urgent ^For Rswew ^ please Comment ^ Please Reply ^ Please Rscyel® JRN 24 '04 13:07 208 938 5873 Par,F R1 SRN-24-2004 01 12 LRND CAN5ULTRNTB INC 208 938 5873 P.02i02 Land Consultants Inc. 52 N. 2ND Street • Eagle Idaho 83616 • Office 208.938.3812 + Fax 208.938-5873 January 23, 2004 Plamxing and Zoning Commission City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave, Meridian, Idaho 83642 1tE: Chesterfield Subdivision Annexatioo/Zoniug, PUDand PtetiminaryPlat-Requestto Table Dear Commissioners; As representative for Centennial Development, LLC, please accept this request for postponement of Chesterfield Subdivision, scheduled for public hearing on February 5, 2004. The mason for this request is due to minor changes to the layout as required by the Fite Department, and to allow PBrZ staff adequate time to review prior to yow next meeting. We herby request to be placed on the February 19, 2004 public hearing agenda. Thank you for yow consideration. Sincerely, ~~n.~o Shawn L. Nicke! Representing Centennial. Development, LLC Ce: Meridian City Clerk's Office Meridian Punning and Zoning Department TOTRL P.02 JRN 24 '04 13 07 208 938 5873 PRGE.02 MAYOR Rober[ D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird ~°( ' ~,~ ,~' an of f,"~~, ~../Vl eY1G~1~Y1 ~` tl IDAHO TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January Transmittal Date: January 2, 2004 File No.: CUP 03-070 2004 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-G854 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 4G6-9272 • FAX 4GG-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 896-5500 • Fax 887-1297 Hearing Date: February 5, 2004 Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development with request for reduction to the minimum requirements for lot size, street frontage and front yard setbacks for patio home lots for Chesterfield Subdivision By: Centennial Development, LLC Location of Property or Project: east of North Black Cat Road and north of West Franklin Road David Zaremba, P/Z (No vAR, vac, FP) Vecard, PiZ (No VAR, VAC, FP) Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No vAR, vac, FP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Robert Come, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C KeRh Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (N Building Departmen Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Departure t RECEIVE o VAR, VAC, FP) t JAN - 9 2003 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP Doty) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP only) U.S. WOSt (FP/PP only) Intermountain Gas (FP~PP anty) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Hl7~ltAfy'G n KBCOI'nS (FP/PP only) Meridian Dev nt Corporation Histo ' ation Commission Your Concise Remarks: E~~I~~ JAN 0 F "^~3 CIS a ~,>r' i~vt1~:RIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 836 ~gp~.~ '~r3, 7~~!pT City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 Fi~it~~ tJ t~~~t 7th' (2Q8y'88T4813 MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird ,. UTY OF 1 . _., „ „ C~ri~i~n~~ ~8 11 IDAHO LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 • FAX 466-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 29, 2004 Transmittal Date: January 2, 2004 Hearing Date: FebrU8ry 3, 2004 File No.: CUP 03-070 ReQUeSt: Condkional Use Pemtit for a Manned Development vAth request for reduction to the minimum requirements for lot size, street frontage and front yard setbacks for patio home late for Chesterfield Subdivision By: Centennial Development, LLC Location of Property or Project: east of North Black Cat Road and north of West Franklin Road David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, vac, FP) Vacant, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Robert Cowie, Mayor Bill Nary, CJC Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Ity Planner Parks Department Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian brig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP only) U.S. West (FP/PP ~~ry) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP Only) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP oNy) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (Annexa5on Doty) Ada County Land Records (FPiPP oMy) Meridian Development Corporation Remarks: Historical Preservation Commission RECEIVEL, ~fi~Fa ~ 0 2004 Cfty of Meridian City Clerk Office 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT •• DISTRICT Return to: HEALTH Environmental Health Division DEPARTMENT ^ BOlse ^ Eagle Rezone # Conditional Use # ~ (~ P p -©7U Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ^ Garden City ~eridian ^ Kuna ^ ACZ ^ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. .~AIV 1 4 2004 ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. City Of Meridian City Clerk Office ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ or bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and ~ water availability. /7p 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ~ ~ ~eentral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage J~eentral water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ~-eentral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ~~entral water /~ Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store Id~'4. Please see attached stormwater management recommendatations ^ 15. Date: ~/ ! /~ Reviewed By: ~--~~~~~' ~oHO~o,k~ Review Sheet CENTRAL ~® DISTRICT ~~1'HEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFRCE • 707 N. ARhLSTRON6 PL. • BOISE, ID 83704-0825 • (208) 375-5211 • FAX 327-8500 To prerenl and treat disease and disabiiipq to promote I+eaGh~~ lifestyles; and to prorecz and prwnote d+e Leatr6 and quaiitP of our en virm+mEnr. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that storm water bepre-treated prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals -that could be used for guidance are: State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, July 1997. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise- Public Works Department, May 2000. ^•a.u,<.oxm Serningl'alley,Ebronre.8ni~e,nndAdaCaunties_ _~_ Ad2 I Boise County UNice Eimor~ Lounr; i)i:cE .zi!e~ ioL'ni\' ~iiiCE 707 N. Armstrong PI. SZ0 E. 8th St. North 7G: N. 1 ~ 5+- ID 83704 Boue Mountain Home, ID E364i P.D. Gox 144E , Endro. Health: 327-7499 Endro. Heahh: 587-9225 McCall, IC 8353E Family Planning: 327-7400 Familv Health: 5Ei-a407 Ph. 6.4-i15<. Immunizations: 's27-7450 WIC 587-S4Gc FAY: 534-21 Senior Nu[rdion: 327-7460 F.4Y: SE7.352! WIC 327-748E F,X: 527-E 50:' RECEIVF~ JAN 151003 City of Meridian City Clerk pfficr ~ ~c ~~u ~n~u~ii ~rra~uct 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 8 January, 2004 William G. Berg Jr. City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 RE: CUP 03.0070 and PP 03-046 -Chesterfield Subdivision Dear Will: Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nompa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires a Land Use change Application be filed for review prior to final platting. Please contact Donna Moore at 466-7861 for further information. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. The District's Purdam Drain and Kennedy Lateral course through this proposed project. This easement must be protected and any encroachment without a signed License Agreement and approved plan, before any construction is started, is unacceptable. All municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. Thank you, ~~ ~ Bill Henson Asst. Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District BH/dbg C: Water Superintendent - - -' Shawn NickeULand Consultanfs, Inc. File • OffIce/Shop APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 RECEIVED JAN 152003 City of Meridian ~ (~ ~j ~ ~ y ~j City Clerk ©fnfice ~J 1503 FIRST STREEr SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Scott Sherrow W & H Pacific 3130 S. Owyhee Street Boise, ID 83705 RE: Land Use Change Application -Chesterfield Subdivision Dear Mr. Sherrow: Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466.7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above-referenced development. If this development is under a "rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application. Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned, operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P. Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's office, or John P. Anderson, at the District's shop. Sincerely, ~idated by Ms. Moore aril mailed wilhaA signature in her absance to ewe delay Donna N. Moore, Asst. Secretary/Treasurer NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DNNI/smc cc: File Water Superintendent Will Berg, City Clerk, Meridian City Shawn L. Nickel, Land Consultants, Inc., 52 N. 2nd Street, Eagle, ID 83616 Centennial Development LLC, 114 E. Idaho Street, Suite 230, Meridian, ID 83642 enc. APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 8 January 2004 g~~ti~D CITY OF MERIDIAN FEB - 5 2004 PUBLIC HEARING CITY Or ,_.;..,.,~:.:v SIGN-UP SHEET DATE February 5, 2004 ITEM # 10 PROJECT NUMBER CUP 03-070 PROJECT NAME Chester'Feld Subdivision NAME PLEASE PRIN FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL