Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 15, 2004 P&Z MinutesMeridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 75, 2004 Pg. 2 aF 124 Mathes: Page 1. Borup: All right. Yes. The cover sheet was correct the other one was not. All right. Thank you. Zaremba: Let's see. I have no corrections to these minutes, but I would only comment, again, for the record that we still have not seen October 6, 2003, and now we have not seen December 4, 2003. If we approve the minutes of December 18th, we have moved passed both of those. We have two of them that are still outstanding. October 16th and December 4'", both of 2003, I have not seen yet. Green: We'll get those to you. Zaremba: That being said and hearing no other comments, Mr. Chairman, I move that we approve the Consent Agenda, which means the minutes of December 18, 2003, as written. I'm sorry, with the one amendment made by Commissioner Mathes. Mathes: Second. Borup: Motion and second. All in favor? Any opposed? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Powell: Chairman Borup, before you open the first public meeting, can I make a quick introduction from our new Deputy City Clerk? Borup: Yes. Please do. Powell: This is Jolene Robles and she comes to us from, I believe, the St. Anthony area and she is our new Deputy City Clerk, so she will, I believe, start taking over for Tara probably at these hearings. Item 4. Continued Public Hearing from November 6, 2003: AZ 03-025 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 57.84 acres from RUT to C-G zones for Blue Marlin by W. H. Moore Company -northwest corner of East Ustick Road and North Eagle Road: Borup: Okay. Welcome. We do have a -- this was a Continued Public Hearing. We do have a letter in our packet again requesting to be continued one more time. Zaremba: Mr. Chairman, I would move that we continue this hearing to our meeting of February 19~' as the next available date. Borup: The q uestion I would h ave i s, s tall, h as there been any communication w ith them? Are -- is that adequate time this time or -- Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 15, 2004 Pg. 3 of 124 Hawkins-Clark: Chairman Borup, Members of the Commission, yes, it is. The main reason it was delayed the first time, if you recall, was there was some disagreement with the staffs report and I think there has been some ground made, at least to the point that they're willing to have the hearing now. The problem is that they did not get the property posted 10 days before this hearing, so we could not have -- we could not open the' hearing tonight because of the posting issue. Borup: Wasn't it posted the first time? Hawkins-Clark: No, I don't believe it was. Borup: Oh, we couldn't have held the first hearing either. Hawkins-Clark: Right. Borup: Okay. Zaremba: If it hasn't been posted, then, the hearing hasn't been opened, so a motion to continue it is not in order. We should table it. Semantics, but -- Borup: Well, right. Our -- it's been -- Hawkins-Clark: We do have arepresentative - Borup: A couple of months ago, it was back in November -- Zaremba: I thought it had been opened atone time and we did continue it. Borup: That's the way it's written is that it's a continuation. Hawkins-Clark: Chairman, if it was continued the first time, I think staff would recommend that it be continued again. Borup: Right but if it wasn't noticed -- if it wasn't posted the first time -- it wasn't posted or it wasn't noticed? Hawkins-Clark: Posted. Borup: If it wasn't posted the first time, we never should have opened that hearing either, should we? Hawkins-Clark: That's correct. Meridian Planning and Zoning CommisEaon Meeting January 15, 2004 Pg. 4 of 124 Borup: But it wasn't noticed, so there could have been public -- because we had the paper notification and letters went out and everything else. Okay. Okay. That's a good date. You said February 19th and -- Zaremba: This is just a suggestion. Borup: It's a pretty open agenda and -- Zaremba: We continue it, as opposed to table it. Green: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, if it has not been posted, we have to renotice it. It will have to be a whole new Public Hearing. Zaremba: Okay. In that case, I need to move that the Public Hearing be closed? Green: Correct and that we renotice it. Borup: Are we clear that it definitely was not -- Hawkins-Clark: Chairman Borup, could (suggest -- we do have Mr. Seel here tonight representing the developer and they could clarify that on the record. Borup: Mr. Seel, would you like to go ahead and do that. Seel: Jonathan Seel, 600 N. Steelhead, Boise, Idaho, representing W.H. Moore Company. To my knowledge, it's never been opened. We elected to postpone it or -- Borup: So, we tabled it the first time. Seel: Tabled it, but there has never been a Public Hearing, to my knowledge. Borup: Okay. Seel: So, as they say, part of the thing was we were working some details out, we knew that January 5`h was the date that we had to notice it. We didn't get it worked out by then, so, obviously, we couldn't have it tonight anyways, but we ask that it simply be tabled anyways. Borup: Well, it may have been opened and continued without public testimony. I don't know if anybody remembers two months ago without checking the minutes. Zaremba: We didn't have a public testimony. Seel: I think I might have a copy of the minutes here if you want to -- Meddlan Planning and Zoning Commission MaeUng January 15, 2004 Pg. 5 of 124 Borup: Weli, that's fine. Either way. I don't think it's going to change what we need to do. Seel: We are going to post it. Borup: There is plenty of time to post it and give proper notification, so whether we continue it or table it, I'm not sure -- Zaremba: If I know you're going to post it anyhow, that tells me, I think, how I want to frame my motion. Seel: Okay. We apologize for the inconvenience here. We just figured it was better to have things in order, then otherwise wasting your time. Borup: Okay. Seel: Thank you. Zaremba: Mr. Chairman, Imove atwo-part hearing -- a two-part motion. One, that if this was previously opened according to -- this hearing on AZ 03-025 was previously opened as found in the records, that it be closed and, second, if it was never opened, I move that we re-calendar it for re-noticing for the Febnaary 19~' meeting. Rohm: I will second that. Borup: Motion and second. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: That's a wonderful motion. We have never had one like that before. Rohm: I liked it, though. Creative. Item 5. Public Hearing: RZ 03-012 Request for a Rezone. of .85 acre from R-15 to O-T for proposed Strickland Subdivision by Roy Strickland - 1125 Main Street: Item 6. Public Hearing: PFP 03-006 Request for Preliminary Final Plat approval of 2 building lots on .85 acre in a proposed O-T zone for proposed Strickland Subdivision by Roy Strickland -1225 Main Street: Item 7. Public Hearing: CUP 03-063 Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a medical office building in a proposed O-T zone for proposed Strickland Subdivision by Roy Strickland -1225 Main Street: