Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutACHD Comments PZDevelopment Services Department Project/File: MAZ-14-001ITen Mile Center This is an annexation and rezone application to allow the development of a mixed use project consisting of retail and medium-density residential on approximately 120.69 acres. This site is located on the east side of Ten Mile Road north of I-84 in Meridian, Idaho. Lead Agency: City of Meridian Site address: Ten Mile Road north of I-84 and south of Franklin Road Staff Approval: March 10, 2014 Applicant: Mirazim Shakoori Treasure Valley Investments, LLC 4313 Mansfield Drive Danville, CA 94506 Representative: Becky McKay Engineering Solutions, LLP 1029 N. Rosario Street, STE 100 Meridian. ID 83642 Staff Contact: Mindy Wallace Phone: 387-6178 E-mail: m~vall~ce~_a_chdi~aho,orq e Findings ~ acf 1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting annexation and rezone approvals for a 120.69 acre site. The applicant is proposing a C-G zone for 81.35 acres, TN-C zone for 26.11 acres, and R-8 for 13.23 acres. This site is located within the City of Meridian's Ten Mile interchange Specific Area Plan's planning area. 2. Descri tion of Adjacent Surroundin Area: Direction Land Use Zoning North Rural Urban Transitional -Ada Count RUT South Rural Urban Transitional -Ada County RUT East Rural Urban Transitional -Ada Count RUT West Rural Urban Transitional -Ada County RUT MAZ-14-001ITen Mile Center 3. Site Otis#ory: ACRD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application. 4. Transit: Transit services are not available to serve this site. 5. New Center Lane Miles: This development will add 1.6 center Lane miles of new roadways. 6. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 7. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP); ® Franklin Road is listed in the CIP and IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Black Cat to Ten Mile in 2016. ® The intersection of Black Cat and Frankiin Road is listed in the CIP to be widened fo 7-lanes on the north leg, 7-lanes on the south, 7-lanes east, and 7-lanes on the west leg, and signalized between 2015 and 2016. ® The Black Cat and Franklin Roads intersection is listed in the IFYWP to be reconstructed in 2016. Traffic Findings fir ®nsiderafi®n 1. Future Traffic Impact Study: This site is located within the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan planning area. If the proposed land uses are different from those adopted in the plan, the applicant should be require to provide an abbreviated traffic impact study {TIS). The TIS should a trip generate analysis comparing the proposed development to the approved uses in the plan and a trip distribution analysis. 2. Trip Generation: Because the proposed land uses within the site area unknown at this time the following table provides trip generation information based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9`" edition. Land Use t7aily Trip PM Peak Hour Trips ' Single-family Home (Unit) 9.52 1 Apartment (Unit) 6.65 0.62 Shopping Center {1,OOOsf) 42.70 3.71 Discount Super Store (1,000 sf) 50.75 4.35 General Office (1,000 sf) 11.03 1.49 Medical Office (1,000 sf) 36.13 3.57 2 MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center 3. Condition of Area Roadways: Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH} Functional PM Peak PM Peak Existing I~oadvvay Frontage Classification Hour Hour Level Plus Traffic Count of Service Pro'ect Ten Mile 1,210- Principal 1 443 Better than " Better than Road feet Arterial , "D "D" Franklin Road N/A Principal 710 Better than Betfer than Arterial "D" "D" '" Acceptable level of service for afive-lane principal arterial is "E" (1,770 VPH}. 4. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT) Average daity traffic counts are based on ACND's most current fraffic counts. The average daily traffic count for Franklin Road west of Linder was 10,449 on 7/6/11. ® The average daily traffic count for Ten Mile Road south of Franklin was 1,443 on 2/2912012. indin S f®r ®nSiderati®n This application is for annexation and rezone only. Listed below are some of the findings for consideration that the District may identify when it reviews a future development application. The District may add addifional findings for consideration when it reviews a specific redevelopment application. 1. Ten Mile Interchange Specific e4rea Plan (TMISAIP) The transportation element of the TMISAP is to guide transportation decisions in the Ten Mile Interchange Area. It was developed concurrently with the Land Use and Design Elements and has been designed to preserve the integrity of the arterial road system and the proposed Ten Mile interchange; provide for the use of public transit; enhance pedestrian and bicycle mobility and accessibility; and create transportation infrastructure and promote land use patterns that encourage the sustainable use of resources and reduces demands on natural resources. The TMISAP recommends the construction of an east/west collector roadway along the site's south property line, anorth/south coliector through the site stubbing to the south, and a roundabout at the collector/collector intersection, The applicant's proposal is consistent with the TMISAP. MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center TMISAP ~- t :~ ;~ 3 ~ r °~ ~ ~~f p ~ k ~ _.. so ~ .._..._. _. c ~ . r ~_ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ , i ,^ .. . A ~ ,~n.__. ~~ ~ ux ~ _ ,.. , . F _ ~ ~ ' jr '--- -- ~ ~ i'~ ' ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ , ~ 1 1 e 61 '6 6 a ~ ~ x p ~. _ ~~ ;,-.„ - a g- ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . _ ,. .._..... . . s 1 ~ as ~°yg.~s wyv~ M.. ~ #~ i x. ~• l~ _ Y}4 "°`. ti av~~~n~;t- qua ..;~~. ...,~<~ _r ~.. ;_ ... ...... -z ~ ~, ~ .. ~: . _ ~-~, r = ,~~ 4 MAZ-14-D01/Ten Mile Center 2. Roadway Configuration Please refer to the image below for roadway names and configuration. I ---~-----~-~ ..--- I _____ ~' ,' iii S ^ ~ 1 -.... ,- ~. .i /, t~ ~~~ I~ -ll I ~-~ ,. ,~ I, F I t I' r-- .~ I r II it it it II I- ! ~ A II ~-~ I~---=- ~I II ll I t ~c ~ I ~ ~ ~-----_ ~-(~ R-8 Ali .. ~' Ili ~± jl j~~ t-""- ~ I~ I I /~ JII I I I ~._ -- i ~ c-r. 11 fI ~--,.~ i ~ i ..n. -, ._-_ I Y lEGE_R -'~ ~ ~ I C`a - - Ftltt13£ ROADWAY /UGN4FN1 1 I I I ~~-~-- (uhY VAkI') 11 -'l-- I ~ I i 1'-s# 3. Road C/Ten Mile Road Interseotion As part of the construction of the Ten Mile Interchange project ITD planned a signal at the intersection of Ten Mile Road and Road C. ITD has indicated that conduit and pull wire have been installed at this location and there is 88-feet of ITD right-of-way at the Road CITen Mile Road intersection to accommodate the installation of the signal. Installation of a signal in this location is also consistent with the TMISAP. Consistent with the TMISAP and to accommodate the traffic anticipated to be generated by the proposed Ten Mile Center project, the applicant should be required to design and install a signal at the Ten Mile/Smithfield Drive intersection. The signal should be constructed through the signal poles and luminaires, prior to signature on the first final plat. When the signal is warranted in the future, as determined by ACRD, the District will complete the installation of the mast arms, signal heads, controller and wiring and put the signal into operation. The westbound leg of the intersection should be designed to accommodate six travel lanes, bikE lanes, verfical curb, and gutter, an 84-foot wide street section within the 88-feet of ITD right-of- way. The construction of center landscape islands will be restricted from the first 600-feet of the westbound leg of the intersection east from Ten Mile Road. ~. ROUndal~OUtS a. existing Conditions: There are no roundabouts within the site. b. Policy: Intersection Control Policy: District policy 5108.5 states that roundabout traffic control shall be considered and evaluated as an option if the intersection is being considered for improvement for any of the following reasons: MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center ® A capacity deficiency exists, and an all-way stop and/or traffic signal volume warrant is met as defined in the MUTCD; or ® A safety deficiency exists; or ® Unconventional geometry exists (e.g., five approaches}. An alternatives analysis (potentially including other intersection control types, such as signals and stop signs) shall be conducted at all intersections where a roundabout is being considered. The alternatives analysis shall include a detailed traffic operations analysis and shall considerACHD costs (e.g., right-of-way, construction, and maintenance) and public casts (e.g., delay, safety, and the environment.) The alternatives analysis should be the decisian- making tool used to determine whether or not a roundabout will be constructed. Final discretion for all intersection control decisions rests with ACHD. 'T'raffic ©perations Analysis Policy: District Policy 5108.6 states that traffic conditions shall be analyzed for al! peak periods of the intersection's construction year and design year(s). The construction year is the year the roundabout will be constructed and opened. For federally funded projects the design year is 20 years after the construction year. There may be multiple design years if considering interim designs. Analysis Procedure Policy: District Policy 5108.6.2 states that traffic analysis procedures shall be consistent with the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) beginning with the 2010 edition. Prior to the publication of the 2010 HCM the traffic analysis procedures shall be based upon the equations summarized in NCHRP Report 572; Roundabouts in the United States. Additional analytical or simulation tools may be required to supplement the traffic analysis. The additional analysis tools shall be calibrated to match either the data summarized in NCHRP Report 572, the 2010 HCM (or its subsequent updates), or local conditions. Site selection, data collection, and calibration methods must be pre-approved by ACHD Traffic. Result Reporting Policy: District Policy 5108.6.3 states that roundabout traffic operations shall be reported an a lane-by-lane basis. Volume-to-capacity (V/C), traffic delay, level of service, and 95th percentile queues shall be reported. Acceptable Thresholds Policy: District Policy 51 D8.6.4 states that the acceptable level of service for all roundabouts shall be based upon the critical/worst lane and a maximum volume-to-capacity (V/C} ratio of D.85. Roundabout Designers Policy: District Policy 5108.8.1 states that ACHD roundabout projects shall be designed and submitted by ACRD staff or prequalified firms approved to design roundabouts by ACHD. A peer review shall be performed by an ACHD prequalified roundabout peer review firm for ail roundabouts designed by ACRD staff. The list of firms approved to design and review roundabouts will be available to the public. The ACRD prequalified firms approved to design roundabouts are recommended for developer projects. If a roundabout is not designed by a firm prequalified by ACHD to design roundabouts, the developer shall have a roundabout peer review performed by a firm acceptable to ACHD. Preliminary Deliverables Policy: District Policy 5108.8.2 s#ates that before plat approval, right-of-way dedication or purchase, grading, or other details are designed, the designer shall demonstrate to ACHD's satisfaction that the preliminary roundabout design meets the standards set forth in ACHD Roundabout Policy. All roundabout designs will be required to meet the same standards outlined in the roundabout policy. Preliminary submittal deliverables shall include the following items; 1, Traffic Operation Analysis Summary MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center Include input parameter summary sheets and output tables as necessary so analysis can be independently replicated. 2. 1:50 Scale Plan View Include curbs and pavement markings. Plan view shall be supplemented with an AutoCAD compatible file. 3. Wheel Path Plots illustrate the wheel paths of the design vehicle(s) making every movement from each approach. Additionally, aside-by-side swept path plot shall be provided with the appropriate design vehicle{s) for multilane roundabout sections, 4. Fastest Path Plots Illustrate the fastest path for every movement from each approach. Include a complete speed comparison table. 5. Natural Path Plots Illustrate the natural path for every movement from each approach. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct 2 roundabouts, one at the north property fine at the Road A/Road B intersection and one at the south property line at the Raad C/Road A intersection. The roundabouts are proposed to be split an the property line with half of both roundabouts to be constructed on properties owned by SCS Brighton, LLC. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal to construct 2 roundabouts at the Road A/Road B intersection and the Raad C/Road A intersection is consistent with the TMISAP, and ACRD 's actions on Ten Mile Crossing and TM Creek Subdivision north and south of the site and should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to design both roundabouts. If the right-of-way can be acquired from the property owner to the north and south {SCS, Brighton, LLC} and a cost share agreement between the two parties can be reached, the roundabouts should be constructed with this project. If right-of--way for the construction of the roundabout cannot be acquired at this firne, then the applicant should be required to provide a road trust deposit for the construction of half of the roundabout minus the design costs. The roundabout would then be constructed when the parcels to the north and south develop. The applicant should be required to provide the preliminary deliverables for the roundabout design as part of the plan submittal as identified in District policy 5108.8.2, noted above. The roundabout should be designed by a qualified designer following ACHD's Roundabout Design Guidelines. The applicant should be required to dedicate all islands as right-of-way owned by ACRD; and the Developer or Property Owners Association should apply for a license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within the islands. 5. Ten I~lile R®ad a, Existing Conditions: Ten Mile Road is improved with 5-travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter, and a 7-foot wide asphalt path and 7-foot wide attached concrete sidewalk abutting the site. There is 114 to 235-feet of right-of-way for Ten Mile Road (30 to 75-feet from section line). b. Policy: Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. included are sidewalk construction or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any improvements to Ten Mile Road abutting the site. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations:, Ten Mile Road was recently reconstructed to its ultimate width as a 5-lane roadway in conjunction with the Ten Mile Interchange Project and is fully-improved. Therefore, staff recommends no additional roadway improvements or right-of- way dedication on Ten Mile Road be required as part of this application. 6. IV®rth/S®uth G®Ilect~r, R®~d A a. fWxisting Conditions: There are no collector roadways within the site. b. Policy: Collector Street Policy: District policy 7206.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all collector frontages adjacent to the site or internal to the development as required below, regardless of whether access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typologies Policy: District policy 7206.5 states that if the collector street is designated with a typology on the Master Street Map, that typology shall be considered for the required street improvements. If there is no typology listed in the Master Street Map, then standard street sections shall serve as the default. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard right-of-way width for collector streets shall typically be 50 to 70-feet, depending on the location and width of the sidewalk and the location and use of the roadway. The right-of-way width may be reduced, with District approval, if the sidewalk is located within an easement; in which case the District will require a minimum right-of-way width that extends 2-feet behind the back-of-curb on each side. The standard street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-furn lane, and bike lanes. Sidewalk Policy: District policy 7206.5.6 requires a concrete sidewalks at least 5-feet wide to be constructed on both sides of all collector streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-af-curb shall be a minimum of 7-feet wide. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of--way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-af-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. AGH® Master Street Map: ACRD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of way acquisition, collector street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. Anew collector roadway was identified on the MSM with the street typology of Town Center Collector. The new collector roadway should intersec# MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center with Franklin Road on the north and continue through the property stubbing to the south. The Town Center Collector typology as depicted in the Livable Street Design Guide recommends a 3-lane roadway with bike lanes, and on street parking, a 60-foot street section within 88 feet of right-of-way. Landscape Medians Policy: District policy 7206.5,14 states that landscape medians are permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided: • The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACRD. • The width of an island near an intersection is 12-feet maximum for a minimum distance of 150-feet. Beyond the 150-feet, the island may increase to a maximum width of 30-feet. • At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and tapers. • The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply fora license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within these medians. • The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer including, but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions. • Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shall slope away #rom the curb to prevent ponding. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct a northlsouth collector to run between 2 roundabouts to serve the site. The applicant has not proposed a specific street section for the north/south collector roadway. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal to construct collector Road A between 2 roundabouts is consistent with the TMISAP and ACHD's actions on TM Creek and Ten Mile Crossing subdivisions located north and south of the site. The northlsouth collector should be constructed as a 3-lane town center collector consistent with the TMISAP and the MSM. 7. Northern ~as~JVVest C®Ilec~or Roadwray, R®ad ~ a. Existing Conditions: There are no collector roadways within the site. b. Policy: Collector Street Policy: District policy 7206.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all collector frontages adjacent to the site or internal to the development as required below, regardless of whether access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typologies Policy: District policy 7206.5 states that if the collector street is designated with a typology on the Master Street Map, that typology shall be considered for the required street improvements. If there is no typology listed in the Master Street Map, then standard street sections shall serve as the default. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard right-of-way width for collector streets shalt typically be 50 to 70-feet, depending on the location and width of the sidewalk and the location and use of the roadway. The right-of-way width may be reduced, with District approval, if the sidewalk is located within an easement; in which case the Dis#rict will require a minimum right-of-way width that extends 2-feet behind the back-of-curb on each side. The standard street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes. MAZ-14-001ITen Miie Center Sidewalk Policy: District policy 7206.5,6 requires a concrete sidewalks at least 5-feet wide to be constructed on both sides of all collector streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of 7-feet wide. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged, A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the pub}ic right-of-way or wholly within an easement. ACW© Master Street Map: ACRD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master 5freet Map (MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, collector street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. Anew collector roadway was identified on the MSM with the street typology of Town Center Collector. The new collector roadway should intersect with Ten Mile Road on the west and continue through the property stubbing to the east. The Town Center Collector typology as depicted in the Livable Street Design Guide recommends a 3-lane roadway with bike lanes, and on street parking, a 60-foot street section within 88 feet of right-of-way. Landscape Medians Policy: District policy 7206.5.14 states that landscape medians are permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided: ® The median is platted as right-of-way awned by ACHD. m The width of an island near an intersection is 12-feet maximum for a minimum distance of 150-feet. Beyond the 150-feet, the island may increase to a maximum width of 30-feet. ® At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and tapers. ® The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply fora license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within these medians. ® The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer including, but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions. ® Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shall slope away from the curb to prevent ponding. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a portion of the northern east/west collector roadway from Ten Mile Road east to a proposed roundabout. The location of the roadway is consistent with the TMISAP and ACHD's prior action on TM Creek located north of the site. The applicant has not proposed a specific street section for the northern eastlwest collector. d. Staff CommentslRecommendations: The applicant's proposal is consistent with the TMISAP and the MSM and should be approved, as proposed. The extension of Road B east to the proposed roundabout at the Road A/Road B intersection will require coordination with property owner to the north (SCS Brighton, LLC). The applicant should be required to design Road B from Ten Mile Road east to the proposed roundabout at the Road A/Road B intersection. 10 MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center ff the right-of-way can be acquired from the property owner to the north (SCS Brighton, LLC} and a cost share agreement between the two parties can be reached, the roadway should be constructed as part of this project, if right-of-way and cost share agreement for the construction of the roadway cannot be acquired at this time, then the applicant should be required to provide a road trust deposit for the construction of half of the road minus half of the design cost. Road B would then be constructed when the parcel to the north develops. ~. Southern E~st/lnlest Collector, load C a. Existing Conditions: Road C has not been constructed through the site. There is 88 to 73- feet of ITD right-of-way for Road C between Ten Mile Road and the site's south property line. b. Policy: Collector Sfireet Policy: District Policy 7206.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all collector frontages adjacent to the site or internal to the development as required below, regardless of whether access is taken to al! of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typologies Policy: District Policy 7206.5 states that if the collector street is designated with a typology on the Master Street Map, that typology shall be considered for the required street improvements. If there is no typology listed in the Master Street Map, then standard street sections shall serve as the default. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7206.5,2 states that the standard right-of-way width for collector streets shall typically be 50 to 70 feet, depending on the location and width of the sidewalk and the location and use of the roadway, The right-of-way width may be reduced, with District approval, if the sidewalk is located within an easement; in which case the District wi11 require a minimum right-of--way width that extends 2 feet behind the back-of--curb on each side. The standard street section shall be 46 feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes. Off-site Streets Policy: District Policy 7206.2.3 requires proposed developments not served by a public street that are fully improved to urban standards (curb, gutter, sidewalk) or wi#h a minimum of 30-feet of pavement to provide 30-feet of pavement with 3-foot gravel shoulders from the site to a public street specified by the District; OR the developer shall provide 24-feet of pavement with 3-foot gravel shoulders and a minimum 6-foot wide detached asphalt/concrete pedestrian facility, from the site to a public street specified by the District. Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7206.5.6 requires concrete sidewalks at least 5 feet wide to be constructed on both sides of all collector streets. A parkway strip at least 6 feet wide between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of 7 feet wide. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way fine and 2 feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement, i-andscape Medians Policy: District Policy 7206.5.14 states that landscape medians are permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided. • The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACRD. 91 MAZ-14-009/Ten Mile Center ® The width of an island near an intersection is 12' maximum for a minimum distance of 150'. Beyond the 150' the island may increase to a maximum width of 30'. ® At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and fiapers. ® The Develaper or Homeowners Association shall apply for a license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within these medians. ® The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer including, but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions. m Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shall slope away from the curb to prevent ponding. ACH® Master Street Map: ACRD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map {MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, collector street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. Anew collector roadway was identified on the MSM with the street typology of Town Center Collector. The new collector roadway should intersect with Ten Mile Raad on the west and continue through the property s#ubbing to the north. The road should eventually connect with i=ranklin Road to the north. The Town Center Collector typology as depicted in the Livable Street Design Guide recommends a 3-lane roadway with bike lanes, and on street parking, a 60-foot street section within 88 feet of right-of-way. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant hasn't proposed any improvements to Road C abutting the site. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: As part of ACHD's action on Ten Mile Crossing Subdivision south of the site, that applicant, SCS Brighton, proposed to construct Road Coff- site within ITD's right-of-way as a 5-lane roadway with 6-lanes at the Ten Mile/Road C intersection, ACRD approved this proposal with the understanding that the road would be constructed to meet ACHD's standards within ITD's right-of-way and that the right-of way would be transferred to ACHD. The Ten Mile Crossing staff report also notes that if SCS Brighton is able to acquire additional right-of-way from this applicant, Treasure Valley Investments, L.LC, then sidewalks should be constructed. if additional right-of-way cannot be acquired at the time Road C is constructed, then the applicant, Treasure Valley Investments, LLC, would be responsible to construct the sidewalks, If this site moves forward and development occurs prior to Ten Mile Crossing Subdivision, and Road C is necessary to serve the site, it should be constructed according to ACHD's Off-Site Street policy which requires the construction of a minimum of 30-feet of pavement with 3-foot gravel shoulders. Additionally, the applicant should be required to dedicate additional right- of-way and to construct 5-foot wide detached sidewalks on both the north and south sides of Road C. 9. Internal Collector, Road D a. Existing Conditions: Road D has not been constructed through the site. b. Policy: Collector Street Policy: District Policy 7206.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all collector frontages adjacent to the site or internal to the development as required below, regardless of whether access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typologies Policy: District Policy 7206.5 states that if the coAector street is designated with a typology on the Master Street Map, that typology shall be 92 MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center considered for the required street improvements. If there is no typology listed in the Master Street Map, then standard street sections shall serve as the default. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard right-of-way width for collector streets shall typically be 50 to 70 feet, depending on the location and width of the sidewalk and the location and use of the roadway. The right-of-way width may be reduced, with District approval, if the sidewalk is located within an easement; in which case the District will require a minimum right-of-way width that extends 2 feet behind the back-of-curb on each side. The standard street section shall be 46 feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes. Off-site Streets Policy: District Policy 7206.2,3 requires proposed developments not served by a public street that are fully improved to urban standards (curb, gutter, sidewalk) or with a minimum of 30-feet of pavement to provide 30-feet of pavement with 3-foot gravel shoulders from the site to a public street specified by the District; OR the developer shall provide 24-feet of pavement with 3-foot gravel shoulders and a minimum 6-foot wide detached asphalt/concrete pedestrian facility, from the site to a public street specified by the District. Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7206.5.6 requires concrete sidewalks at least 5 feet wide to be constructed on both sides of all collector streets. A parkway strip at least 6 feet wide between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians, Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-af-curb shall be a minimum of 7 feet wide. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged, A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2 feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of--way or wholly within an easement. Landscape Medians Policy: District Policy 7206.5.14 states that landscape medians are permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to accommodate the #rave! lanes and where the following is provided. ® The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACRD. • The width of an island near an intersection is 12' maximum for a minimum distance of 150'. Beyond the 150' the island may increase to a maximum width of 30'. • At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and tapers. ® The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply for a license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within these medians. • The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer including, but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions. • Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shall slope away from the curb to prevent ponding. AOHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, collector street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. Anew collector roadway was identified on the MSM 13 MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center with the street typology of Town Center Collector. The new collector roadway should intersect with Road A on the west and continue through the property stubbing to the north. The road should eventually connect with Franklin Road to the north. The Town Center Collector typology as depicted in the Livable Street Design Guide recommends a 3-lane roadway with bike lanes, and on street parking, a 60-foot street section within 88 feet of right-of-way. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct Road D from its intersection with Road A on the west and continuing through the site stubbing to the north property line. The applicant hasn't proposed a specific street section for Road D. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal to construct collector Road D is consistent with the TMISAP and the MSM and should be approved, as proposed. The Road D should be constructed as a 3-lane town center collector consistent with the TMISAP and the MSM. 10. Local Street, Road ~ a. Existing Conditions: There are no local roadways within the site. b. Policy: Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Street Section and Right-of-VVay Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of--way widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than 50-feet wide and that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval. Standard Urban Local Street-36-foot to 33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy: District Policy 7207.5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb} for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be within 50-feet of right-of-way. The District will also consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval. Most often this width is a 33-foot street section (back-of--curb to back- of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. Off-Site Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.3 states that if the proposed development is not served by a public street with at least 24-feet of pavement then the developer shall pave the street or widen the existing pavement to provide 24-feet of pavement with 3-foot gravel shoulders from the site to a public street specified by the District. Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development shall be extended in that development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following: Reduces vehicle miles traveled. ® Increases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. a Increases access for emergency services. ® Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system ® Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries. ® Promotes appropriate intro-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks, neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc. ® Promotes orderly development. 7~4 MAZ-14-001ITen Mile Center Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the stree#. Some local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks. The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least 8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce the width of the parkway strip. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.). Developments with lot sizes of 1-acre or greater, but less than 5-acres per dwelling will provide streets with a 30-feet wide surface (26-feet of pavement with 2-foot concrete ribbon on each side), 4-foot of which will be striped for non-motorized travel on each side. The minimum right-of-way width for this street section shall be 52-feet in order to encompass the entire swale section. The developer shall construct on both sides of the road a 2-foot wide (minimum) concrete ribbon 8-inches thick and an $-foot wide drainage swale along the edge of the pavement to accommodate the runoff from the development. See Section 7207.5.6 for roadside swale requirements. Cut-de-sac Streets Policy: District policy 7207.5.8 requires cul-de-sacs to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet; in rural areas or for temporary cul-de-sacs the emergency service providers may require a greater radius. Landscape and parking islands may be constructed in turnarounds if a minimum 29-foot street section is constructed around the island. The pavement width shall be sufficient to allow the turning around of a standard AASHTO SU design vehicle without backing. The developer shall provide written approval from the appropriate fire department for this design element. The District wilt consider alternatives to the standard cul-de-sac turnaround on a case-by-case basis. This will be based on turning area, drainage, maintenance considerations and the written approval of the agency providing emergency fire service for the area where the development is located. Landscape Medians Policy: District palicy 7207.5.16 states that landscape medians are permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided: The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACRD. ® The wid#h of an island near an intersection is 12-feet maximum for a minimum distance of 150-feet. Beyond the 150-feet, the island may increase to a maximum width of 30-feet, ® At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and tapers. ® The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply fora license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within these medians. 15 MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center ® The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer including, but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions. ® Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shad slope away from the curb to prevent ponding. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a several local streets to serve the Traditional Neighborhood Center and residential portion of the site. The applicant hasn't proposed specific street sections for the local streets. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Staff is supportive of the proposed street configuration and it shauld be approved, as proposed. The local roadways within the site, Road Es' should be constructed meeting ACHD's local street section policies as noted above. 11. Stub Stree$~ a. Existing Conditions: Right-of-way for Waltman Street and Lilac Street abut the site's southeast property line. b. Policy; Stub Street Policy; District policy 7206.2.4 states that stub streets will be required to provide circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with the requirements described in Section 7206.2.5.4 except a temporary cul-de-sac wilt not be required if the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS IS A DESIGNATED COLLECTOR ROADWAY. THIS STREET WILL BE EXTENDED AND WIDENDED IN THE FUTURE." In addition, stub streets must meet the following conditions: o A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the nearest street intersection within the proposed development and drain surface water towards that intersection; unless an alternative storm drain system is approved by the District. ® The District may require appropriate covenants guaranteeing that the stub street will remain free of obstruc#ions. Temporary Dead End Streets Policy: District policy 7206.2,4 requires that the design and construction for cul-de-sac streets shall apply to temporary dead end streets. The temporary cul-de-sac shall be paved and shall be the dimensional requirements of a standard cul-de-sac. The develaper shall grant a temporary turnaround easement to the District for those portions of the cul-de-sac which extend beyond the dedicated street right-of-way. In the instance where a temporary easement extends onto a buildable lot, the entire lot shall be encumbered by the easement and identified on the plat as anon-buildable lot until the street is extended. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct one stub street to the north, and two stub streets to the south. One of the stub streets to the south is proposed to tie into Waltman/Lilac Streets. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meet's District policy and should be approved, as proposed. The proposed connection to Waltman/Lilac Streets is an important connection, in that it will allow the residents in that area to access future services planned within the site, and it will provide secondary access to that area. At this time Linder Road is the only way in or out of that area. The proposed stub street connection will allow for the traffic to be distributed between the new connection and Linder Road, The applicant should be required to install signs at the terminus of both stub streets stating that, "THIS IS A DESIGNATED COLLECTOR ROADWAY. THIS STREET WILL BE EXTENDED AND WiDENDED IN THE FUTURE." 96 MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center If the stub street extend greater than 150-feet a temporary turnaround will need to be constructed at the terminus of the stub streets. The temporary turnarounds should be paved and constructed as standard cul-de-sac turnarounds with a minimum radius of 45-feet. 12. Neighborhood Concerns The applicant has indicated to staff that there are some neighborhood concerns regarding the applicant's proposal to extend a stub street to Waltman/Lilac Street which would allow for connectivity between the proposed development and the existing neighborhood south and east of the site. Those concerns include: ® The existing condition of Waltman Lane, ® The existing traffic generated by Peregrine Elementary School, ® The neighboring property owners do not want a vehicular connection to Waltman/Lilac from the site, and ® Storm drainage problems on Waltman Lane. ACRD will work with the City of Meridian to review the concerns raised by the neighboring property owners and address them as part of a future action on the preliminary plat application for this site. 13, Cost Share Agreet~ents As noted in Findings 3 and 6, the construction of Road B and the roundabouts will require cooperation between the applicant and the property owner to the north and south. The applicant reports they have had discussions with the property owner to the north and south and they have both agreed on the alignment presented. Each property, when it develops should be required to enter into a Development Agreement to provide for the design and construction of the road and roundabout the apportionment of costs. The Ten Mile Center applicant should be required to design the roadway and roundabout and provide a deposit for half the costs of construction minus the design costs, When the properties to the north and south develop, that applicant will be required to construct the road and roundabout paying the balance of construction costs and be reimbursed for the applicant's proportionate share from the deposit. The Development Agreements will provide for any differences in the estimated costs versus the actual costs. If the property owner to the north and south will work with the Ten Mile Center applicant and dedicate the right-of-way with this development, the applicant should then be required to build the road and roundabout at this time and be reimbursed in the future from the property owner to the south when they develop. This will require both parties entering into the Development Agreements at this time to provide for the apportionment of costs and future reimbursement. 14. fridge for Road ~ The Distric# will require that the applicant submit the bridge plans far the crossing of the Ten Mile Creek (Road 13) for review and approval prior to plan approval and signature of the first final plat. The applicant should dedicate additional right-of-way or a permanent right-of-way easement to a minimum 5 feet beyond the wing-wails of the structure. 15. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class I! trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet. 77 MAZ-14-001 (Ten Mile Center 16. Landscaping Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACRD right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle at intersections, District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all District requirements prior fo signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans. 17. ®thelr a4ccess Ten Mile is classified as a principal arteria- roadway, Roads A,B,C, and D are classified as collector roadways, Other than the access specifically approved wifh this application, direct lot access to these roadways is prohibited. o i p~iic nitir~s ®f per®v~{ This application is for annexation and rezone only. The District may add additional findings for consideration when it reviews a specific development application. Site Specific Conditions will be will be established at that time. o tandar nitin~ per®rral Z. All irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACRD right-of-way. 2. Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACRD right-of-way. 3, In accordance with Dis#rict policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number} for details. 5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACRD right-of-way or easement areas. 6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at na cost to ACRD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shalt be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days priar to breaking ground within ACRD right-of way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) far details. 9. All design and construction shall be in accordance wifh the ACRD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 18 MAZ-14-001iTen Mile Center 70. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACRD prior to District approval for occupancy. 91. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shalt be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACRD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless awaiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. a n~iusi®rts ®f Lam The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. t~~hm~n~s 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Utility Coordinating Council 4. Development Process Checklist 5, Request for Reconsideration Guidelines 19 MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center VICINITY MAP 20 MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center SITE P~.AN i I F ;,, ~ F C-C ' ~ i / ! C-G ~~ r r ~ It it t l z~ ii 1-'~=~ `„ r ~~_, _ C"C ~ ~ f _ ~~ a `/ ` P~ __ C • -. .. W._ ~ ~~~ C-C _......._...- Filit}RE R SAVhY AItGNMEK! (MAY VA4Y~ 9-x»' ! L-( _ k «_--.,.fit ~ /~.__`. kll j ! i I t !~~ I~t r ! it in-C j~l TH-C ~._ .___~___~.. f i ~ TREASUREVAL~EYGENTER 1p EIU~fN~'~kfNG ~OLdfTflll{~ 29 MAZ-14-d011Ten Mile Center Ada C®unty lJtility C®®rdinating C®uncil Developer/L.ocal Improvement District Right of VVay Improvements Guide}ine Request Purpose: To develop tale necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process. 1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC}. Notifica#ion shah include but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities. 2} Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference. 3} Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon. 4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise agreed upon. Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent ta; 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com for email notification information. 22 MA.Z-14-001/Ten Mile Center Development Process Checklist Items Completed to Date: ®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACRD ®The ACRD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following: ^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at this time. ®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. Items to be completed by Applicant: ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter: • The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of- way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ^Pay Impact l=ees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Non-Subdivisions) ^ Driveway or Property Approach(sj • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACHD Construe#ion (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working in the ACRD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACHD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Pian Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisia~s) ^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up aPre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative &Pian, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Stormwater Section. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling aPre-Con. 23 MAZ-14-009/Ten Mile Center Requesf f®r .Appeal ®f Staff ®e~i~a®n 1. Appeal of Staff ®ecision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACRD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant far the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10} working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shaft not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply; The ROWDS Manager shall have ten {i0) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager`s reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. 24 MAZ-14-001ITen Mife Center Request for reconsideration ®f Corn~is~ion Action Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACRD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting. c, The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting. d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACRD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action an the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACRD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority at the Commission deems advisable. f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission. 25 MAZ-14-001/Ten Mile Center