Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
File Documents Cedar Springs AZ 00-019 and PP 00-018
If-ITY CLERK FILE CHECKLISO Project Name: Revised Cedar Springs Findings / Conclusions / Order: Contact Name: Kevin Howell Flle No. PP 00-018/AZ 00-019 Phone: 383-4302 Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: F] Findings Recorded 0"� Planning and Zoning level: �AA.,�C� AIM C-A*(CPA.) August 21, 2001 Q Transmittals to agencies and others: Hearing Date: September 20, 2001 P9 Notice to newspaper with publish dates: N/A August 22, 2001 ❑ Certifieds to property owners: N/A and N/A ❑ Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: ❑Approve Deny Notes: ❑ Copies Disbursed: ft -MW I t City Council Level: Hearing Date: F Transmittals to agencies and others: ❑ Notice to newspaper with publish dates: and Certifieds to property owners: ❑ City Council Action: ❑ Approve EJ Findings / Conclusions / Order---; ed fr Deny V om attorney on: Findings / Conclusions / Order: Approved by Council: ' «�A,.WLkb k �"„�0� a,� �ErW� Copies Disbursed: wM" F] Findings Recorded 0"� Development Agreement: �AA.,�C� AIM C-A*(CPA.) Sent for P0-*(, CP signatures: COF-i *CWk Signed by all parties: 8"T-C— "MC.W`"""° CWAft-y Approved by Council: cwf: E]ft Recorded: "�0W*CWk > ❑ Copies Disbursed: ft -MW I t Ordinance No. _ ft Resolution No. C*., ❑ Approved by Council: ❑ Recorded: peadline: 10 days ❑ Published in newspaper: ft -o aft ❑ Copies Disbursed: 0 "CJ.* Notes: TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: September 13, 2001 Transmittal Date: August 22, 2001 Hearing Date: September 20, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Preliminary Plat approval of 264 building lots and 31 other lots on 99.82 acres in an R-4 zone for Revised Cedar Springs By: Kevin Howell Development Location of Property or Project: nw of North Meridian Road and West Ustick Road Sally Norton, P/Z (No vAR, vAc, FP) Jerry Centers, .P/Z (No VAR, vAc, FP) Bill Nary, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keven Shreeve, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP) Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FPiPP only) U.S. West (FP/PP only) Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (Annexation only) Building Department Your Concise Remarks: Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential only) AZ -27 FP -24 PPIPFP-26 VARNAC- 20 CUP -26 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 •Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: September 13, 2001 Transmittal Date: August 22, 2001 Hearing Date: September 20, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Preliminary Plat approval of 264 building lots and 31 other lots on 99.82 acres in an R-4 zone for Revised Cedar Springs By: Kevin Howell Development Location of Property or Project: nw of North Meridian Road and West Ustick Road Sally Norton, P/Z (No vAR, vAc, FP) Jerry Centers, .P/Z (No VAR, vAc, FP) Bill Nary, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keven Shreeve, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP) Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FPiPP only) U.S. West (FP/PP only) Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (Annexation only) Building Department Your Concise Remarks: Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential only) AZ -27 FP -24 PPIPFP-26 VARNAC- 20 CUP -26 a Memo TO: P&Z Commission Frorre Brad Hawkins -Clark Z"� 0 CC: Shad Stiles (P&Z), Bill Nichols, Gary Lee (J -U -B), Brad Watson (Pub. Works) Date: 08/17/01 Re: Cedar Springs Resubmittal Process (AZ -00-019 & PP -00-018) Dear Commissioners, This memo is to clarify the process that staff recommends for handling the Order of Remand from City Council of the subject applications. As you know, the Commission recommended approval of the subject applications to Council at your March 15, 2001 meeting. On June 19, 2001, City Council acted on the applications, recommending several modifications to the plat and remanding both the Annexation and Preliminary Plat applications back to the Commission. The Applicant has now re -submitted the Preliminary Plat with a new application cover sheet and letter, incorporating the Council's recommended changes. The applications will have the same application tracking numbers. No modifications were made to the original Annexation application; it stands as originally submitted with an R-4 zone proposed for the entire 100 acres. In accordance with the Remand Order, Bill Nichols, City Attorney, recommended that the P&Z Commission review the revised Preliminary Plat. Since the Commission originally recommended approval of the plat and since a new application was not required to be submitted by the Applicant, a public hearing is not necessary before the Commission. To fulfill due process, a public hearing will be held before the City Council, but only after the Commission makes a formal recommendation upon review of the revised Preliminary Plat. Your review should include both the Annexation & Zoning application as well as the Preliminary Plat application. Staff has scheduled the Commission's review of the revised Preliminary Plat for your second meeting in September (9-20-01). Copies of the revised Preliminary Plat have been transmitted to all the standard agencies, in case the plat modifications trigger any changes to original comments. A full staff report will be prepared prior to the 9-20 meeting. 0 Page 1 oo� 2 REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerk's possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month that the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P. M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision: Cedar Springs 2. General Location: Northwest of N. Meridian Rd. /West Ustick Rd. 3. OwnersofRecord: Leslie Family Trust/Moore Family Trust Address: 1185 Osprey Ride Rd . Eagle, t-ip 83616 Telephone 383-4302 4. Applicant:Kevin Howe D v Tele hone a��-4 i�? Address: 1 7 W. R" r o' F_ip_331 Z p 5. Eneer:M _tth�W R Srnult _Firm: U B ^�r_Tticcoc ginrnr 6. Name and address to receive City billings- Name: Key i n Howell Address 1087 W. River St., X250, Boise, 83702 Telephone 383-4302 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres: 99.82 2. Number of building lots• 26L 3. Number of other lots: ^ ^a 1 4. Gross density per acre:_ 2 64 — 5. Net density per arae: 3 '4 6. Zoning Classification(s): R4 7. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification? RUT 8. Does the plat border a potential green belt? �NYes -Homeowner 0 en Spaces 9. Have recreational easements been provided for. 10. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City? No Explain Site is adjacent to future city park. AUG 22 101 12:4 , 7G1A 7P7 g77F7 RECEIVED —� 0 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. fJ- U• B,1 A i Jr 1 6 7!; r i. ENGINEERS *SURVEYORS - PLANNERS MAYO.IS Gr I; 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 CITY OF N ERIDIAN Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 FAX: 208/323-9336 August 14, 2001 Honorable Mayor of the City of Meridian Honorable Council Members Planning Et Zoning Commission Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planning Et Zoning Department 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision (Annex and Prelim. Plat) No. AZ -00-019 No. PP -00-018 In accordance with the Order of Remand to Planning and Zoning dated June 19, 2001, by the City Council, please find enclosed 16 copies of the revised preliminary plat with 16 copies of an 8-'/i" x11 " reduction of same for the above -referenced Cedar Springs Subdivision Preliminary Plat. In addition, we wish to address each of the inconsistencies identified within the remand order in the preliminary plat that has been corrected. These revisions will be discussed as presented in the remand order as follows: 1.1 West Anton Street has been extended to the west boundary of Cedar Springs Subdivision to a point, which will provide access to Mr. John Kennedy's property. This location has been reviewed with Mr. Kennedy and he finds it acceptable. 1.2 Any previous references to L-0 and multi -family have been removed from the preliminary plat of Cedar Springs Subdivision. 1.3 West Ashby Street has been relocated to run along the southern boundary of Cedar Springs Subdivision. This alignment was discussed with Tom Kuntz, the City of Meridian Parks Director and he found it to be acceptable. In addition, we are proposing that the developer of Cedar Springs Subdivision construct this street as shown on the revised preliminary plat. We are proposing that the City construct the curb and gutter with four feet of pavement along the southerly side of West Ashby Street adjacent to the proposed city park. No sidewalk is planned along the southern side of said street, the city pathway within the park will provide for pedestrian traffic. The developer will construct curb, gutter and sidewalk along the northern side of this street along with 28 feet of pavement. (1 /2 street + 12') 1.4 The lots have been re -designed to accommodate more diversity in lot sizes throughout the Cedar Springs Subdivision. A table has been included within the new preliminary plat showing the number and percentage of lots for various lot sizes within the development. Honorable Mayor of the City of Meridian Engineers Surveyors Planners Honorable Council Members Planning Et Zoning Commission Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planning Et Zoning Department August 14, 2001 Page 2 1.5 This revised preliminary plat, and as previously submitted, includes the construction of Venable Lane from West Ustick Road, north approximately 1700 feet to West Ashton Drive. The road will have 58 feet of right-of-way and a street section that is 41 -feet wide. The developer of Cedar Springs Subdivision will construct one-half of said street plus 12 feet in accordance with ACHD review comments. Future development to the west will construct the balance of the roadway. The balance of Venable Lane from West Ashton Drive north to the northern boundary of Cedar Springs Subdivision will be vacated when those lots are developed. Further, we have delivered a copy of this new revised preliminary plat along with the electronic media to Don Carnahan and Keller and Associates to use for their easement and design preparation for the White Drain Sewer Trunk for that portion which will be routed through Cedar Springs Subdivision and the Mr. John Kennedy properties. It is our hope that the easement documents will be prepared by Keller and Associates in a timely manner so that the developer of Cedar Springs Subdivision can review them. In addition, the revised preliminary plat is being sent to Christy Richardson of the Ada County Highway District for review. It is not anticipated that their review comments will change since the plat has not changed significantly to affect the traffic patterns for the collector streets within the development. Please schedule this revised preliminary plat before the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission as soon as possible. Let me know if you require additional information or if you have any questions. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. Project Manager GAL:Ihc Enclosures cc: Kevin Howell, Howell -Murdoch Corporation Brad Watson, P.E., City Engineer Christy Richardson, ACHD Don Carnahan, P.E., Keller and Associates F:\projects\11644\admin\City Letter 8-14-01.doc �a CEDAR SPRINGS PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' YORGASON J RAMON YORGASON MARILYN 2304 N COLE RD BOISE ID 83704-7371 N LINDER RD WHITE WANDA TRUST 4399 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 4273 N MERIDIAN RD HOWELL-MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1087 W RIVER ST STE 250 BOISE ID 83705-0000 W USTICK RD N MERIDIAN RD 3615 N MERIDIAN RD WHITE FAY M 4015 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5421 KENNEDY JOHN 218 RUBY ST BOISE ID 83705-5940 W USTICK RD COOPER DALE E COOPER KATHY A 1030 W USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5452 W USTICK RD LESLIE FAMILY TRUST MOORE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 6290 BOISE ID 83707-0000 W USTICK RD PAULSON OSCAR I & MAXINE D AND PAULSON JAMES I & PAULA A 4118 CATALINA RD BOISE ID 83705-0000 W USTICK RD MERIDIAN CITY 33 E IDAHO AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-2631 W USTICK RD 3245 N MERIDIAN RD PAULSON OSCAR I & MAXINE D AND PAULSON JAMES I & PAULA A 4118 CATALINA RD BOISE ID 83705-0000 W USTICK RD 840 W USTICK RD LITZ GRACE R LIFE ESTATE LITZ KENNETH L 870 W USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5452 LESLIE FAMILY TRUST MOORE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 6290 BOISE ID 83707-0000 W USTICK RD BRINEGAR E E BRINEGAR VIRGINIA 5190 N LOCUST GROVE RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 650 W USTICK RD WHITE WANDA TRUST 4399 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 4273 N MERIDIAN RD MYER JACK J & BERNELDA M TRUST MYER MARGARET LYNN TRUSTEE PO BOX 818 MERIDIAN ID 83680-0818 4010 N MERIDIAN RD BAYLESS DAVID N BAYLESS EUNICE J 3860 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5420 BLADES V L & I R REV LVNG TRST 540 E USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5548 MCBIRNEY PROPERTY TRUST 1162 BENTOAK LN SAN JOSE CA 95129-3104 C s SIMUNICH JOE SIMUNICH KATHERINE 955 W USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5427 VENABLE ERLAN J & CARYL A 6678 WARREN SPUR RD MELBA ID 83641-5226 N VENABLE LN WARD RUBY E 745 W USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5478 BOLES ROBIN L BRITT CHRISTINE M 595 W USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5425 • .Mm O I co M n C N � � n mo)D.=4 x o fTl Z O c D D Z O Q < r M CD m O No CD c O O �NZZ ° Q7 Z N O O v -� m z D m g z M M o z d N-� W 1p0 z A n CIN 9 MERIDIAN "Hub of Treasure Valley 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 888433 Customer's p� Order No. 1 Date i '21-0 Name l-//—!! Address Phcne: ?iii I I O O mm I I I v Opp I w DDvf I N mmto I D 1 (NJ fTi (n 2 iC m I I oa I m 0 I I mD ° n I i I M N D All claims and returned goods MUST be accompanied � 1 07013796 Received C cn c D cn K OC N D Eft rn _' m O N O O O J M co 0 CIN 9 MERIDIAN "Hub of Treasure Valley 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 888433 Customer's p� Order No. 1 Date i '21-0 Name l-//—!! Address Phcne: ?iii I I � I I I I I I 1 I I I I I i I I I I All claims and returned goods MUST be accompanied by this bill. 1 07013796 Received TAX GS -202-2 PRINTED IN U.S.A. B IVIAL1 hU 11f() 17&1� 100 100 100 7n=1zTjjTm=-= - -- W. USTICK ROAD W.ASHBY STREET o � 1 INTERNAL ADT PREDICTIONS 760 Q Q 0 ff z Q 0 w 5 a CEDAR SPRINGS _ RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION r U•B� FIGURE 4 ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS• PLANNERS IJ -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. 0 0 Future Level of Service ' Meridian Road/Ustick Road Intersection The future Level of Service (LOS) was calculated under two separate scenarios. First, the ' LOS was calculated for the intersection with future growth and without the effects of this development. Secondly, the additional traffic generated by the community's growth and the proposed residential subdivision is shown on the revised peak -hour projections. The ' second LOS was re -calculated using the existing traffic, plus the traffic generated by growth and the traffic from the proposed development. 1 L The resulting LOS follows: This all -way stop -controlled intersection's current level of service during the afternoon peak -hour is LOS "B" with an average of 14.8 seconds of delay per vehicle. With only the growth in this area over the next five years, the intersection will operate as a LOS "C" with an average of 20 seconds of delay per vehicle. With the growth and the additional traffic the projected LOS for the entire intersection has deteriorated to LOS "E". The movement with the worst delay is the northbound through movement. It has a 64 second delay per vehicle. The southbound through/right movements also had a calculated LOS "E". Both of these lanes had the highest traffic volumes and an all -way stop seems to congest rather quickly under conditions with high traffic. The westbound lane was at an LOS "D" and the eastbound approach had an LOS "C". These lanes had lighter traffic, which is an advantage in a traffic control system where motorists "take turns". Existing and future PM Levels of Service and average delay per vehicle are as follows for each approach of the stop -controlled intersection at Meridian Road and Ustick Road: Existing 2000 Northbound "C", 15.4 sec. Eastbound "B", 13.1 sec. (overall, LOS "B") Southbound "C", 15.1 sec. Westbound "C", 15.5 sec. 2005, w/growth Northbound "C", 22.0 sec. Eastbound "C", 15.7 sec. (overall, LOS "C") Southbound "C", 20.5 sec. Westbound "C", 20.8 sec. 2005 w/ Subd. Northbound "F", 55.8 sec. Eastbound "C", 17.5 sec. (overall, LOS "E") "E", 41.�gp6 sec. Westbound "D", 26.6 sec. 7Southbound 2005, w/ Subd. s` Northbound "A" Eastbound "D" Southbound "A" Westbound "F" Diagrams of the predicted turning movement peak hour volumes are shown on the following page. Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study page 11 1 IJ -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. 0 a t t 0 a 0 X 4 f 165 40 USTICK ROAD � USTICK ROAD 256 Figure 5 2005 Peak Hour predictions with growth. 0 a 0 Cr 4 J 185 45 USTICKR v. USTICK ROAD 287 71 0 a 0 Figure 6 2005 Peak Hour Predictions with development. Access 2, Meridian Road/Ashton Lane Intersection The left turn from Ashton Lane has an average 13.7 seconds per vehicle delay. This is Level of Service "B". A left -turn bay would be warranted, given the volumes at this access (Access 2) exceed those of the first access on Meridian Road. Access 3, Ustick Road/Venable Lane Intersection The LOS for the left -turn movement from this intersection is LOS "B" with 14 seconds delay per vehicle. At the intersection of Venable Lane and Ustick Road, there will be 18 Left -turning vehicle in the peak -hour and 296 opposing westbound vehicles on Ustick Road. Again, this exceeds the threshold for the construction of a left -turn bay. Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study Page 12 The three major accesses to the subdivision were also examined for their performance under the anticipated traffic volumes. Access 9, Meridian Road/Ashby Street Intersection The Level of Service at the intersection of Ashby Street with Meridian Road was also checked with the future traffic after full build -out of the subdivision. Under these traffic volumes, the LOS for the intersection was LOS "B" with an average delay of 12.1 seconds for traffic making the eastbound left -turn. Would left lane a -turn be warranted for the northbound traffic entering the subdivision? According to the standard charts (displayed in the appendix), with 17 left -turning vehicles and 190 southbound vehicles in the opposing through lane, a left -turn bay would be warranted on Meridian Road for this access. Access 2, Meridian Road/Ashton Lane Intersection The left turn from Ashton Lane has an average 13.7 seconds per vehicle delay. This is Level of Service "B". A left -turn bay would be warranted, given the volumes at this access (Access 2) exceed those of the first access on Meridian Road. Access 3, Ustick Road/Venable Lane Intersection The LOS for the left -turn movement from this intersection is LOS "B" with 14 seconds delay per vehicle. At the intersection of Venable Lane and Ustick Road, there will be 18 Left -turning vehicle in the peak -hour and 296 opposing westbound vehicles on Ustick Road. Again, this exceeds the threshold for the construction of a left -turn bay. Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study Page 12 L t n L� t I� 11 t 0 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Recommendations With the additional traffic of the nearby subdivision, the intersection of Meridian Road and Ustick Road has deteriorated to a Level of Service that is unacceptable. The traffic volumes have outgrown the method of traffic control for this intersection. An all -way stop control is no longer acceptable in this case. A two-way stop control with the traffic on Ustick Road stopping at Meridian Road was investigated as a temporary solution. The traffic on Meridian Road is well served by this alteration of the traffic control, but the traffic on Ustick can expect excessive delays. This is not an equitable solution. A traffic signal could be employed at this intersection providing that the warrants for a signal are met. Given these future traffic volumes from area growth and this subdivision, we predict that a traffic signal will be warranted at full development. The first warrant, for Minimum Vehicular Volume, will most likely be met with the full build -out of the proposed subdivision. The first warrant was not met by the year 2005 with the general area growth alone. One of the other ten warrants may be met at this time, but this prediction is difficult to support without specific data relating to the future conditions at this intersection. Intersections created by the three accesses to the subdivision atl operate well under stop - control conditions. Each intersection had an LOS "B" for the left -turn from the access onto the major roadway. Summary ✓ A signal will be warranted at the Ustick Road / Meridian Road Intersection prior to the horizon year of this study. ✓ Each access from the subdivision should have two separate lanes at the exit, one for left turns, exclusively. ✓ Each access to the subdivision should be constructed with a left -turn bay on the major road. Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study Page 13 1 11 • Appendix ✓ Traffic Counts ✓ Growth Rate ✓ Trip Generation ✓ Level of Service Calculations ✓ Traffic Signal, Warrant i Worksheet ✓ Standard Left -turn Lane Warrants t8/03/00 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY 10:12.32 G WAY DISTRI 1 318 EAST 37TH ST BOISE, ID 83714 (208) 387-6140 TRAFFIC SERVICES *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** Site ID : USTICK RD 486 Info 1 : W OF MERIDIAN Start Time 00:00 Info 2 : 45032 Start Date : Aug 2, 2000 Wed Factor : 1,000% End Time : 23:00 tane #1 EndDate :g22000Wed Info : A00 EE Lane Mode : Directional Sensor Used : Axle DivideB*2:Yesane t#2 Info : D00 WB Lane Mode : Directional Sensor Used : Axle Divide By 2 : Yes Date Day Time Lane #1 Lane #2 _____ Avg. Total 8/02/00 Wed 00 00 ----------------- -- 9 12 01:00 5 5 10-------21- 5 02:00 2 7 4 10 03:00 4 4 4 9 8 04:00 9 4 6 13 05:00 29 16 22 45 06:00 75 58 66 133 07:00 179 83 131 262 08:00 122 47 84 169 09:00 104 45 74 149 10:00 106 88 97 194 11:00 135 94 114 229 12:00 121 89 105 210 13:00 103 65 84 168 14:00 110 98 104 208 15:00 122 112 117 234 16:00 123 124 123 247 17:00 204 208 206 412 18:00 177 194 185 371 ' 19:00 113 154 133 267 20:00 99 121 110 220 21:00 98 109 103 207 22:00 53 70 61 123 23:00 24 27 25 51 24 HOUR TOTAL 2126 1834 1980 3960 ' PERCENTS 54% 46% AM AM PM Total Percent PM Peak Peak Peak Peak (ane--Total-Percent`-Avg_ ------------------ Avg. AM Total PM Total #1 779 36.6% #2 64.9 1347 63.4% ------ --- _ 112.3 07:00 179 17:00 - 204 __-463 -25_2% -_38.6 f --1371 _74_8% -114.3 11:00 94 17:00 208 __ _______ _____ ___ 9NINNC7d QHD� 3639-'33-397 bb Zi 999Zi9IJ39 8/03%00 0:12:33 *DA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICO 318 EAST 37TH ST BOISE, ID 83714 (208) 387-6140 TRAFFIC SERVICES *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** 8 Site ID : MERIDIAN RD 487 Peak Info 1 : N OF USTICK RD Start Time 00:00 Info 2 : 30929 Start Date : Aug 2, 2000 Wed Factor : 1.000% End Time : 23:00 x* **r****** r rr* ****** *** ** Date Aug2, r *x***r* r r k Wed pane #1 Info AQO NB rEnd *2000* gy Lane Mode : Directional Sensor Used : Axle 04:00 4 ane #2 Info D00 SB 228 Lane Mode : Directional Sensor Used : Axle 35 07_ 00 06:00 Date Day Time Lane Lane ------------- 8/02/00 Wed 00• ----------- AM ,Lane --Total #1 675 #2 740 Z3 39~d Avg. Total 7 5 7 5 27 85 137 122 106 96 105 122 111 111 146 171 231 156 94 82 79 39 25 2078 15 10 15 10 55 171 274 245 213 193 210 244 223 223 292 343 463 312 189 164 159 79 50 4156 AM Percent Avg. .00 8 7 Peak 01:00 7 3 ^ 02:00 1 3 PM 03:00 8 7 111.1 04:00 4 6 228 05:00 20 35 07_ 00 06:00 91 80 07:00 138 136 08:00 116 129 09:00 100 113 10:00 94 99 11:00 88 122 12:00 114 130 13:00 107 116 14:00 103 120 15:00 147 145 16:00 175 168 17:00 228 235 18:00 155 157 19:00 91 98 20:00 83 81 21:00 71 88 22:00 33 46 23:00 24 HOUR TOTAL ---26 ---24 2008 2148 PERCENTS 48% 52% AM ,Lane --Total #1 675 #2 740 Z3 39~d Avg. Total 7 5 7 5 27 85 137 122 106 96 105 122 111 111 146 171 231 156 94 82 79 39 25 2078 15 10 15 10 55 171 274 245 213 193 210 244 223 223 292 343 463 312 189 164 159 79 50 4156 AM Percent Avg. PM Total Percent PM Avg. Peak AM Peak Peak Peak ^ Total PM Total 33.6% 56.3 61 7 1333 66.4% 1408 111.1 07:00 _ 138 17:00 228 -34_5% -- 65_ - 5% --- 117_3 07_ 00 136 --- 17:00 235 9NINNV7a QH97 Z6Z9-L3Z-30Z bb:ZT 9g0Z/9T/39 8/03100 WDA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRI* Page: 0:12:32 318 EAST 37TH ST BOISE, ID 83714 (208) 387-6140 TRAFFIC SERVICES *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** ite ID USTICK RD 484 Start Time : 00:00 Info 1 : E OF MERIDIAN Start Date : Aug 2, 2000 Wed Info 2 ; 45039 End Time : 23:00 Factor 1.000% End Date : Aug 2, 2000 Wed Lane #1 Info : A00 EB Sensor Used : Axle Lane Mode : Directional Divide By 2 : Yes Lane #2 Info : D00 WB Sensor Used : Axle ane Mode : Directional Divide By 2 : Yes Lane Lane Date Day Time #1 #2 Avg. Total -------------------------------------- F8/02/00 wed 00:00 16 14 15 30 01:00 5 7 6 12 02:00 3 5 4 8 03:00 6 3 4 9 04:00 9 4 6 13 05:00 31 21 26 52 06:00 75 79 77 154 07:00 157 95 126 252 08:00 129 65 97 194 09:00 10:00 94 113 55 83 74 98 149 196 11:00 135 94 114 229 12:00 142 77 109 219 13:00 109 62 85 171 14:00 136 95 115 231 15:00 145 90 117 235 16:00 154 120 137 274 17:00 246 189 217 435 18:00 208 236 222 444 19:00 138 163 150 301 20:00 129 144 136 273 21:00 124 120 122 244 22:00 76 87 81 163 23:00 32 32 32 64 24 HOUR TOTAL 2412 1940 2176 4352 PERCENTS 55% 45% AM AM PM PM Peak Peak Peak Peak Lane Total Percent Avg. Total Percent Avg. AM Total PM Total -------------------------------------------------------------------- #1 773 32.0 64.4 1639 68.0 136.6 07:00 157 17:00 246 #2 525 27.1% 43.8 1415 72.9% 117.9 07:00 95 18:00 236 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ VO 39Cd DNINNVId QH9h `629 -L32 -30Z bb:ZT 000Z/9T/30 F8/03/00 *ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRIC Page: 10:12:32 318 EAST 37TH ST ' BOISE, ID 83714 (208) 387-6140 TRAFFIC SERVICES 1 90 39"d 9NINNH7d QHOH C'6C9-L3E-39Z bb:ZL 009Z/9i/39 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** **�cic�c�cick*�c�c**it�kic�F' k�r�ct*�c�c**icttyc�F*�rk**ic7c*�c�c�***k�c*icy'c�F�c�t�**�rFk*ic�c�F*�t�k**�c**�k*��F�cxt�c�c lte ID : MERIDIAN RD 485 Start Time : 00:00 Info 1 S OF USTICK RD Start Date : Aug 2, 2000 Wed : Info 2 . 45036 End Time : 23:00 Factor : 1.000% End Date : Aug 2, 2000 Wed tane#1 Info : A00 NB Sensor Used : Axle Lane Mode : Directional Divide By 2 : Yes ane #2 Info D00 SB Sensor Used Axle ane Mode Directional Divide By 2 Yes *ic*�c�ic�c*;rbc***t*�c+r,t�ck��cic*!c*�rt*tt*icyck***t**�r+c*icic,t**ic��t*+rbc*ic�c�c7c;E*ic*�r�cictYr�c*�c�t�cyc*�cicicic Lane Lane Date Day Time #1 #2 Avg. Total --------------------------------------------- 08/02/00 Wed 00:00 15 10 12 25 01:00 9 7 8 16 r 02:00 03:00 7 12 6 10 6 11 13 22 04:00 5 6 5 11 05:00 24 45 34 69 06:00 98 113 105 211 07:00 162 197 179 359 08:00 136 165 150 301 09:00 10:00 118 141 151 140 134 140 269 281 11:00 139 164 151 303 12:00 184 174 179 358 ' 13:00 159 157 138 316 14:00 162 155 158 317 15:00 221 176 198 397 16:00 235 202 218 437 17:00 322 264 293 586 18:00 234 262 248 496 19:00 152 146 149 298 20:00 138 129 133 267 21:00 121 115 118 236 22:00 62 69 65 131 23:00 37 33 35 70 24 HOUR TOTAL 2893 2896 2894 5789 ' PERCENTS 50% 50% AM AM PM PM Peak Peak Peak Peak Lane Total Percent Avg. Total Percent Avg. AM Total PM Total -------------.-- ---- --.----- --- --- ----------------------1-6-2--1-7-:-0 ---------------- #1 866 299 722 2027 70.1$ 168.9 07:00 162 17:00 322 #2 1014 35.0% 84.5 1882 65.0% 156.8 07:00 197 17:00 264 r------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ 1 90 39"d 9NINNH7d QHOH C'6C9-L3E-39Z bb:ZL 009Z/9i/39 c O i+ u a, N L Q) rLf O u N ra O C: O c� 00 00 00 Q) c v O cq J O u FO- 10 "D O r� M M 00 N O o,�-+ to r O� N 1� N N L O N N N N CC m O O N .-- .- N M 3 � go o L W h 00 O Ul Ul N Ul N N N 'T 'T Ul to %O 3 H O 'T N 10 M O% M �- 10 N e- tT 3 Ln N N a0 % 00 O, co W v s ~ _ 0% C14 00 Yi fV N M N LnO N M im p uj to J O O w u W � �- O N M .- � :n c L C ~ N M M M M Ln M M 5 m N •L J NT M In Ln In M m to 03 rn-qT O V M N O N Z L ~ CD N r- rn N to N M t M co Z z C J r M %O 00 O,Ln O qT tf1 coZ a E u7 O to G to 0 Ln O M q- O tv1 C O O �t �t ti i tr i tri t1i �O f- O to O to p Ln O Ld 00 I I o I� I Ia I Q i N o to oI IL I LM O I I o �qr io I to CD I-, Q r O IL QI 1,0 Ln IS t ^ NIS O I I 00 I� I Ln � I o iL I D v 0) � I o �1= oI Ia i I o I I D 0 1 0� O I I� I T o, to 1I '� � o I� o CD I I T a, C, i L L L 7 Q R Ou r o Y n � � n 1 2 w C O c Y 1 O d ro C Z) N N R R CL N Q) b L 0 O c m Q) O 0 O O O u CL O L � U � CL n 3 a v N Q! O z 0 0 N co low Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision Calculation of average yearly growth Predicted ADT provided by Compass • Appendix Traffic Impact Study Cameron McGough 345-5274 Meridian Road 8/2/00 2001 2008 2020 Growth Rate North of Ustick ADT: 2965 ADT: 4064 1.6733 % per year South of Ustick ADT: 4401 ADT: 9886 4.3514 % per year Ustick Road 50.0 2001 5789 2020 Growth Rate West of Meridian Road ADT: 7939 ADT: 13301 2.7533 % per year East of Meridian Road ADT: 6521 ADT: 15450 4.6445 % per year Current ADT counts: Meridian Road 8/2/00 North of Ustick Road NB ADT: 2008 % 48.3 SB ADT: 2148 % 51.7 Total ADT: 4156 ------------------ South of Ustick Road NB ADT: 2893 % 50.0 SB ADT: 2896 % 50.0 Total ADT: 5789 Average: 3.36 % per year Provided by ACHD Ustick Road 8/2/00 West of Meridian Road EB ADT: 2126 % 53.7 WB ADT: 1834 % 46.3 Total ADT: 3960 ------------------- East of Meridian Road EB ADT 2412 % 55.4 WB ADT: 1940 % 44.6 Total ADT: 4352 f:\projects\11644\admin\Traffic.XLS, Growth 8/29/00 X 0 C 0 C1 C1 Ey L L (n C QO (D 11') U) M m M CD 0 0 d C O m tC L 3 0 O L Z6 • UCIO 00, CY) v O c�a i L O_ i r•i C0 m 04: C) LO N ---}--- i O q' Eb LO i ' O A Q/ i _ Y 0 Of � d'; 0 O = m C,) e ' � O CD 'n � p�O w ... , ------- co C-,) w ' m r- 00 � C L Oi0 � O;M S O 0 = 3 L c Y CL = 0 U7 0 O d 0 4) � a; a o • UCIO 00, CY) O r 00 i i r•i C0 m 04: C) LO N ---}--- i O q' m R LO i ' (D A i _ Y 0 Of � d'; 0 O = m C,) fA w ' CD 'n Ln (o w ... , ------- co C-,) w ' m r- 00 U Oi0 mr O;M M J m i 1 r-- 0 U7 i i T � �v Lf) : N r m (0, ' r - z g ' ~ i r-: C r m M N Z z 0 1 � i C. Eo E >.> O L Z) O O U7 00 V �� 00,L 0 ACV a � U U U Q Q Ln LO r - r L() O) 70 X- C C N 0 m m a a n 2 2 N Cd m 0) 0) U) Z C C m m co U � (6 m m 0 0 Q C a) X X w w O O CY) N 00 Appendix Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision Trip Generation Area 1 Access 1 onto Meridian Road AM Peak Hour Single -Family Detached Housing ITE Trip Generation (Page 264) Per Dwelling Unit On a Weekday, Peak hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One hour between 7 and 9 Dwelling Units: 69 Total Trip Ends: 58 14 Enter 44 Exit PM Peak dour Single -Family Detached Housing ITE Trip Generation (Page 265) Per Dwelling Unit On a Weekday, Peak hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One hour between 4 and 6 Dwelling Units: 69 Total Trip Ends: 77 49 Enter Assume 605yo from South: 30 from the North: 19 28 Exit Assume 60% turn South: 17 turn to North: 11 fAprojects\11644\admin\Traffic.XLS Page 1 8/30/00 • • Appendix Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision Trip Generation Area 2 Access 2 onto Meridian Road AM Peak Hour Single -Family Detached Housing ITE Trip Generation (Page 264) Per Dwelling Unit On a Weekday, Peak hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One hour between 7 and 9 Dwelling Units: 183 Total Trip Ends: 138 34 Enter 104 Exit PM Peak Hour Single -Family Detached Housing ITE Trip Generation (Page 265) Per Dwelling Unit On a Weekday, Peak hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One hour between 4 and 6 Dwelling Units: 183 Total Trip Ends: 185 118 Enter Assume 605vo from South: 71 from the North: 47 67 Exit Assume 60% turn South: 41 turn to North: 26 fAprojects\11644\admin\Traffic.XLS Page 2 8/30/00 0 • Appendix Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision Trip Generation Area 3 Access 3 onto Ustick Road 4M Peak Hour Single -Family Detached Housing ITE Trip Generation (Page 264) Per Dwelling Unit On a Weekday, Peak hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One hour between 7 and 9 Dwelling Units: 81 Total Trip Ends: 66 17 Enter 49 Exit PM Peak Hour Single -Family Detached Housing ITE Trip Generation (Page 265) Per Dwelling Unit On a Weekday, Peak hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One hour between 4 and b Dwelling Units: 81 Total Trip Ends: 89 57 Enter Assume 55% from East: 32 from the West: 25 32 Exit Assume 55% turn East: 18 turn to West: 14 fAprojects\11644\admin\Traffic.XLS Page 3 8/30/00 HC.*nsignalized Intersections Release 3* ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Worksheet 1 - Basic Intersection Information 1. Analyst: G. H. Flatz G r .- 2. Intersection: Meridian / Ustick 3. Count Date: 8/8/00 4. Time Period: PM Peak hour 9_ W�'1� $fay Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics JJ North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L1 1. LT Volume: 54 0 14 0 3 2. TH Volume: 0 179 0 169 140 54 217 3. RT Volume: 0 65 0 7 34 4. Peak Hour Factor: 0.90 0.86 0.70 0.73 0.71 7 0.90 5. Flow Rate LT: 60 0 20 0 4 G. Flow Rate TH: 0 208 0 231 197 60 241 7. Flow Rate RT: 0 75 0 9 47 8. Flow Rate Total: 60 283 20 241 249 7 308 9. Prop. Heavy Vehicle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10. Subject Approach 2 2 2 2 11. Opposing Approach 2 2 2 2 1 1 12. Conflicting Approach 1 1 1 1 1 1 13. Geometry Group 5 5 5 5 2 2 14. T (Time in Hours): 0.250 2 2 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L1 1. Flow Rate Total: 60 283 20 241 249 308 2. Flow Rate LT: 60 0 20 0 4 3. Flow Rate RT: 0 75 0 9 60 4. Prop LT in lane: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 47 0.02 7 0.19 S. Prop RT in lane: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.04 0.19 0.03 6. Prop. Heavy Vehicle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7. Geometry Group 5 5 5 5 2 8. hLT-adj by Table 10-18 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.20 2 0.20 9. hRT-adj by Table 10-18 -0.70 -0.70 -0.70 -0.70 -0.60 -0.60 10. hHV-adj Table 10-18 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 11. hadj 0.50 -0.19 0.50 -0.03 -0.11 0.02 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L1 1. Total lane flow rate 60 283 20 241 249 308 2. hd, initial value 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3. x, initial 0.05 0.25 0.02 0.21 0.22 0.-7 4. hd, final value 7.3 6.6 7.5 6.9 5.9 6.1 5. x, final value 0.12 0.52 0.04 0.46 0.41 0.52 6. Move -up time, m 2.3 2,3 2.3 2.3 2.0 20 7. Service Time 5.0 4.3 5.2 4.6 3.9 4.1 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L1 1. Total lane flow rate 60 283 20 241 249 308 2. Service Time 5.0 4.3 5.2 4.6 3.9 4.1 3. Degree Utilization, x 0.12 0.52 0.04 0.46 0.41 0.52 4. Departure headway, hd 7.3 6.6 7.5 6.9 5.9 6.1 5. Capacity 498 526 483 498 584 575 6. Delay 11.0 16.3 10.5 15.5 13.1 15.5 7. Level Of Service B C B C 8. Delay Approach 15.4 15.1 B 13.1 C 9. LOS, approach C C 15.5 10. Delay, Intersection 14.8 B C 11. LOS, Intersection B East Bound HCS signalized Intersections Release 3.� L1 L1 4 64 165 256 40 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) 0.90 ANALYSIS 71 232 284 Worksheet 1 - Basic Intersection Information 8 294 364 1. Analyst: G. H. Flatz 1 1 1 2. Intersection: Meridian / Ustick 3. Count Date: 8/8/00 4. Time Period: PM Peak hour, 2005 w/ growth Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics North Bound South Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 1. LT Volume: 64 0 17 0 2. TH Volume: 0 211 0 199 3. RT Volume: 0 77 0 8 4. Peak Hour Factor: 0.90 0.86 0.70 0.73 5. Flow Rate LT: 71 0 24 0 6. Flow Rate TH: 0 245 0 272 7. Flow Rate RT: 0 89 0 10 8. Flow Rate Total: 71 334 24 283 9. Prop. Heavy Vehicle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10. Subject Approach 2 2 2 2 11. Opposing Approach 2 2 2 2 12. Conflicting Approach 1 1 1 1 13. Geometry Group 5 5 5 5 14. T (Time in Hours): 0.250 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment worksheet North Bound South Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 1. Flow Rate Total: 71 334 24 283 2. Flow Rate LT: 71 0 24 0 3. Flow Rate RT: 0 89 0 10 4. Prop LT in lane: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5. Prop RT in lane: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.04 6. Prop. Heavy Vehicle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7. Geometry Group 5 5 5 5 8. hLT-adj by Table 10-18 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 9. hRT-adj by Table 10-18 -0.70 -0.70 -0.70 -0.70 10. hHV-adj Table 10-18 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 11. hadj 0.50 -0.19 0.50 -0.03 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time North Bound South Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 1. Total lane flow rate 71 334 24 283 2. hd, initial value 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3. x, initial 0.06 0.30 0.02 0.25 4. hd, final value 8.0 7.3 8.2 7.6 5. x, final value 0.16 0.68 0.06 0.60 6. Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 7. Service Time 5.7 5.0 5.9 5.3 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service North Bound South Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 1. Total lane flow rate 71 334 24 283 2. Service Time 5.7 5.0 5.9 5.3 3. Degree Utilization, x 0.16 0.68 0.06 0.60 4. Departure headway, hd 8.0 7.3 8.2 7.6 5. Capacity 482 485 468 458 6. Delay 12.2 24.1 11.4 21.2 7. Level Of Service B C B C 8. Delay Approach 22.0 20.5 9. LOS, approach C C 10. Delay, Intersection 20.0 11. LOS, Intersection C East Bound West Bound L1 L1 4 64 165 256 40 8 0.71 0.90 5 71 232 284 56 8 294 364 0.00 0.00 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 East Bound West Bound L1 L1 294 364 5 71 56 8 0.02 0.20 0.19 0.02 0.00 0.00 2 2 0.20 0.20 -0.60 -0.60 1.70 1.70 -0.11 0.02 East Bound West Bound L1 L1 294 364 3.2 3.2 0.26 0.32 6.3 6.5 0.51 0.65 2.0 2.0 4.3 4.5 East Bound West Bound L1 L1 294 364 4.3 4.5 0.51 0.65 6.3 6.5 565 550 15.7 20.8 C C 15.7 20.8 C C 11 t v 1 � I HCS:4i g nalized Intersections Release 3.1. ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Worksheet 1 - Basic Intersection Information 1. Analyst: G. H. Flatz 2. Intersection: Meridian / Ustick 3. Count Date: 8/8/00 4. Time Period: PM Peak hour, 2005 w/ growth Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics jrO'^'�t�. Svb6 North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound. L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 Ll 1. LT Volume: 83 0 21 0 4 185 71 287 2. TH Volume: 0 276 0 256 9 3. RT Volume: 0 0.90 100 0.86 0 0.70 11 0.73 45 0.71 0.90 4. Peak Hour Factor: 5 78 5. Flow Rate LT: 92 0 30 0 0 350 260 318 6. Flow Rate TH: 0 320 15 63 10 7. Flow Rate RT: 0 92 116 437 0 30 365 329 407 8. Flow Rate Total: Prop. Heavy Vehicle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.01 9. 2 2 2 10. Subject Approach 2 1 1 11. Opposing Approach 2 2 2 2 2 2 12. Conflicting Approach 1 1 1 1 2 13, Geometry Group 5 5 5 5 2 14. T (Time in Hours): 0.250 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L1 1. Flow Rate Total: 92 43 7 30 365 329 407 78 2. Flow Rate LT: 92 0 30 0 5 63 10 3. Flow Rate RT: 0 1.00 116 0.00 0 1.00 15 0.00 0.02 0.19 4. Prop LT in lane: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.04 0.19 0.020.00 5. Prop RT in lane: 6. Prop. Heavy Vehicle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 5 5 5 2 7. Geometry Group 8. hLT-adj by Table 10-18 5 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.20 0.200 9. hRT-adj by Table 10-18 -0.70 -0.70 -0.70 -0.70 -0.60 .0 6 -0.600 1.7 10. hHV-adj Table 10-18 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 0.02 11. hadj 0.50 -0.19 0.50 -0.03 -0.11 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L1 1. Total lane flow rate 92 437 30 365 329 407 3..2 2 2. hd, initial value 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 0. 36 3. x, initial 0.08 0.39 0.03 0.33 0.29 6.6 4. hd, final value 8.7 8.0 9.0 8.4 6.3 0.58 0.75 5. x, final value 0.22 0.97 0.07 0.85 2.0 6. Move -up time, m 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 4.3 4.6 7. Service Time 6.4 5.7 6.7 6.1 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service North Hound South Bound East Bound West Bound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L1 1. Total lane flow rate 92 437 30 365 329 4074.6 2. Service Time 6.4 5.7 6.7 6.1 4.3 0.58 .75 06.6 3. Degree Utilization, x 0.22 0.97 0.07 0.85 4. Departure headway, hd 8.7 8.0 9.0 8.4 6.3 572 550 5. Capacity 466 448 451 424 26.6 6. Delay 13.9 64.6 12.4 44.0 17.5 D 7. Level Of Service B F B E C 17.5 26.6 B. Delay Approach 55.8 41. 6 C D 9. LOS, approach F E 10. Delay, Intersection 37.5 11. LOS, Intersection E HCS: Unsi4halized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY rCntersection: Meridian/Ustick Analyst: G.H. Flatz Project No.: 11644 26fj o mate: 8/25/00 �Tp1' East/West Street: Ustick Road TWv_ W North/South Street: Meridian Road Study period (hrs): 1.00 intersection Orientation: NS Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Southbound 4ajor Street: Approach Northbound 6 Movement 1 2 3 145 L T R L T R .1olume 54 dourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Redian Type Undivided WZT Channelized? Lanes Configuration *.Jpstream Signal? Minor Street: Approach Movement 7 W L T lolume dourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Dercent Grade (o) Median Storage 1 21ared Approach: Exists? Storage ;T Channelized? r -Janes Configuration NF Approach XRovement mane Config r (vph) (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length k;ontrol Delay LOS Approach Delay rkpproach LOS t 7J 179 65 14 169 7 226 91 20 228 12 1 1 0 1 1 0 L TR L TR No No Westbound Eastbound 8 9 I 10 11 12 T R L T R 54 217 7 3 140 34 76 261 12 4 200 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service tbaund NB SB Westbound1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 L L LTR LTR 60 20 349 248 1339 1255 278 366 0.68 0.04 0.02 1.26 5.85 0.00 0.00 44.38 34.8 7.8 7.9 534.3 D A F 534.3 34.8 F D HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 2005 TWSC - Meridian/Ustick HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Meridian/Ustick Analyst: G.H. Flatz Project No.: 11644 Date: 8/25/00 East/West Street: Ustick Road North/South Street: Meridian Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach N thb 1.00 Movement 1 L or ound 2 T 3 R 1 4 I L Southbound 5 T 6 R Volume 83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 92 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 276 349 __ 100 140 __ 21 30 0 256 345 11 18 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R " -u"LC 71 287 9 4 185 45 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 100 345 15 5 264 58 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L L I LTR 1 LTR 92 30 460 327 1207 1085 0 0 0.08 0.03 0.16 0.00 8.2 8.4 A A a.► 51 c d% . w� r ssz� LC S r 1 HCS: Unsolializ ed Intersections Release 3.2 UIn'ter —TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY section: Meridian Access 1 Analyst: G.H. Flatz (roject No.: 11644 ate: 8/25/00 ast/West Street: Ustick North/South Street: Access 1 'Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle ajor Street: Approach Volumes and Adjustments 13 18 Movement 1 Northbound Southbound 0 7 7 0 2 3 4 5 6 9.4 L T R I L T R tolume .ourly 30 189 B 190 Flow Rate, HFR 33 210 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 211 21 edian Type Undivided T Channelized? Lanes 0 1 LT 1 0 fonfiguration pstream Signal? No TR No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound 1 Movement 7 8 9 1Q 11 12 L T R I L T R F olume ourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles (ercent Grade M edian Storage 1 hared Approach: Exists? tanes T Channelized? Storage Configuration pproach ovement ane Config tvph) (m) (vph) v/c (5% queue length ontrol Delay OS Approach Delay Fproach LOS Delay, NB 1 LT [e7 Queue Length, and Level of SB Westbound 4 I 7 8 9 17 18 13 18 524 14 0 0.03 0 7 7 0 0.00 No 1 1 L R Service Eastbound 10 11 12 L R 33 1348 18 14 0.02 524 823 0.00 0.03 0.02 7 7 0.00 0.00 A 12.1 9.4 B A 10.9 B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 HCS: Uns*alized Intersection • s Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Meridian Access 2 Analyst: G.H. Flatz Project No.: 11644 Date: 8/25/00 East/West Street: Ustick ,North/South Street: Access 2 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments @Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 145 6 L T R L T R Volume 70 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 77 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 edian Type Undivided FR T Channelized? 0.05 Lanes 0 onfiguration 7.9 Upstream Signal? 0 Minor Street: Approach B Movement 7 11.3 L Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles ercent Grade (%) edian Storage 1 lared Approach: Exists? tanes T Channelized? Storage Configuration Approach ovement ane Config (vph) (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length ntrol Delay UoS Approach Delay @Approach LOS 189 190 46 210 211 51 0 1 1 0 LT TR No No Westbound Eastbound 8 9 I 10 11 12 T R L T R 26 28 43 1314 39 28 0.06 0.06 0.05 43 0 0.02 7.9 13.7 0 0 B 0 11.3 B No 1 1 L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 1 LT L R 77 28 43 1314 443 808 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.02 7.9 13.7 9.7 A B A 11.3 B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 ' HCS: UnsQnalized Intersections Rel• e 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Ustick Access 3 Analyst: G.H. Flatz ,Project No.: 11644 Date: 8/25/00 East/West Street: Ustick ,North/South Street: Access 3 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 1.00 Imaj or 5zreet : Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R ,volume 25 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 U edian Type Undividec T Channelized? Lanes Configuration stream Signal? Minor Street: Approach Movement 7 L Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M edian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage tanes T Channelized? Configuration 177 32 296 196 35 328 0 1 0 1 LT LT No No Northbound Southbound 8 9 I 10 11 12 T R L T R 18 35 14 20 1243 15 0 718 0 0 0 0.02 No 1 1 L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound ovement 1 4 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ane Config LT LT L R IF(vph) (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length ontrol Delay ILOS Approach Delay SApproach LOS 27 35 20 15 1243 1389 420 718 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.0 7.7 14.0 10.1 A A B B 12.3 B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Appendix Warrant 1- Minimum Vehicular Volumes Minor Road: Meridian Road Minor Road: Ustick Road Existing Counts: Total of both Approaches: 489 Vehicles per Hour Does not Exceed 600 Highest Minor Approach: 278 Vehicles per Hour Exceeds 150. 2005 Prediction plus Growth (w/o Subd.): Total of both Approaches: 576 Vehicles per Hour Does not Exceed 600 Highest Minor Approach: 328 Vehicles per Hour Exceeds 150. 2005 Prediction plus Growth with Cedar Springs Subdivision: Total of both Approaches Highest Minor Approach f:\projects\11644\admin\Traffic.XLS, Traffic.XLS 748 Vehicles per Hour Exceeds 600. 367 Vehicles per Hour Exceeds 150. 8/30/00 • 0 LEFT -TURN DECE 4TION-LANE WARRANTS 30-35 mph J 300 -00 J J > 00 v 0 10 15 =0-5 30 40-45 mph i0 10 15 :0 DHV or :-ase peak -hour voiume of Vehicles --:ne left into the access 72-F10 101 Eagle Olen Lane, Suite A Eagle, Idaho 83616 BRRRY 2089392692 Attorney at Law, P.A. Admitted to Practice in Idaho & California P. 01 RECEIVED ED APR 17 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Telephone: (208) 939-2600 Facsimile: (208) 939-2692 NUML3)3R OF PAGES BEING TRANSMITTED - 2 IF ALL PAGES ARE NOT RECEIVED, PLEASE TEL,PHONE MARY AT (208) 939-2692, TIME SENTi 4. IS P.M. TIDE ORIGINAL, OF THIS TELECOPY WILL RE SENT BY REGULAR MAIL FAX NUMER, (208) 888-4218 FAX NUMBER: (208) 288-2501 April 17, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Cedar Springs Annexation and Preliminary Plat Applications Case No. AZ -00-019 Case No. PP -00-018 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: This office represents John Kennedy who owns property adjacent to the northwest corner of the proposed Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision. Mr. Kennedy brought this proposed plat to my attention today with concerns regarding access to his property. I am enclosing with this letter a copy of the 1908 Deed which established the public right-of-way for what is now designated as North Venable Lane. As you will note, the right-of- way extends the full length of what is now proposed as the Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision. However, the preliminary plat being submitted in connection with this property only provides for Venable Lane to extend about two-thirds of the way toward the north end of the property. This will leave my client's property essentially landlocked. For that reason, Mr. Kennedy vehemently opposes the approval of this subdivision as submitted. APR 17 101 16:02 20e9392692 PAGE. 01 BRRRY PETERS CI Mayor and Members of the Meridian city council April. 17, 2001 Page 2 2089392692 • P. OZ Although I will be unable to attend the hearing this evening on this issue, I do believe that it is very important for the city not to approve this subdivision which will leave my client essentially landlocked. Mr. Kennedy hopes to be able to attend the meeting this evening. He will be happy to answer any questions which you might wish to submit to him at that time. Thank you for your consideration of this important issue. BP:mmg Enclosure cc: John Kennedy RPALMM4673A^05,L03 APR 17 101 16=02 Very truly ours, Barry P ters 2089392692 10/10/00 12:17 Ctf U-B'k October 10, 2000 X208 323 9336 i Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 400 Meridian, ID 83642 J -U -B ENG. BOISE 11002 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS - PLANNERS 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 FAX: 208/323-9336 -v _D pC1 1 p ?inn City C°,lMk efface City RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision - AZ-00-019/PP-00-018 Members of the Commission: On behalf of our client Kevin Howell, we request that the Commission table the above noted applications to the November 14, 2000 public hearing. By that time the Ada County Highway District will have taken an action on the application and any required changes to the proposed preliminary plat will be a matter of the public record. Thank you in advance for your consideration and attention to this matter. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Daren Fluke, AICP Planning Associate cc: Gary A Lee, P.E./L.S Kevin Howell OCT 10 100 12.31 208 323 9336 PAGE.02 10/10/00 12:1 7 $208 323 9336 0 J -U -B ENG. BOISE 0 J -U -B ENGINEERS, INC. FACSIIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET f0: FROM: WillBerg Daren Fluke C;LdVIPANY: DATE: Cay of Meridian 10/ 10/00 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAVES 1NCLUDINC COVER: 888-4218 2 PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S K6'FaENCE N DABER i RE: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: Cedar Springs prelim plat AZ -00-019 / PP -00-018 i ❑ URGENT ❑ POR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE CONBIENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY O PLL•ASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: FE Will — please let me know if there is a problem with the attached request. Thanks, Daren 0 S. BEECHWOOD AVE., SL B' ISE, IDAHO 83709 208.376.7330 FAX 208.323.9336 201 OCT 10 '00 12:31 208 323 9336 PAGE.01 to 001 NYC)R Robert D Corne CITti" COLNCIL MEIMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird T.arrxnv deWeerd (7terie VkCandless MEMORANDUM: HUB OFIREASUIUY VALLEY Goal Place to Live CITY CSF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 FELX (308) 887-4813 City (led, Office Fax (308) 888-3218 To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner "�L LEGAL DEPARrNf N (208) 388-'_-399 • Fax aS8-2501 PUBLIC, WORKS BUILD LNG DEPARTXrENI' (208) 887 11 - Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING: DEPARTMENT (208) 884-»33 FAX 348-6854 October 6, 2000 E C E I E} CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE Re: CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION - Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-4 for Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction (File #AZ -00- 019) - Request for Preliminary Plat of 99.83 Acres for 358 Lots by Kevin Howell Construction for a Residential Subdivision in a Proposed R-4 Zone (File #PP -00- 018) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY The subject applications propose to annex and plat approximately 100 acres consisting of 333 single-family buildable lots and 25 common lots at a gross density of 3.34 dwelling units per acre. The subdivision would surround the future 56 -acre City park at the northwest corner of Meridian/Ustick on the north and west sides. The preliminary plat proposes two new access roads onto Meridian Road and one new access road onto Ustick Road. A pre -application meeting was held with the applicant and his representatives on 7/18/00, wherein it was stressed that the proposed development needed to complement the park and provide additional amenities (i.e., pathways, etc.), that higher densities were desirable adjacent to the park, and that the City would need to make a determination that annexation of their development is in the best interest of the City. The applicant proposes two pedestrian/bicycle micropath connections from the subdivision to the park, one on the north side of the park and one on the west. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North — Agricultural land and use, zoned RUT (Ada County) South — Existing agricultural; proposed City Park, zoned Limited Office (Meridian). East — Agricultural land and use, zoned RUT (Ada County) West — Rural residential homes on parcels ranging from 4-10 acres in size, zoned RUT (Ada County) AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&O October 6, 2000 Page 2 CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD The Leslie Family Trust and the Moore Family Trust are the current property owners and have submitted consent for both applications. ANNEXATION AND ZONING GENERAL COMMENTS Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, states that both the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment." In other words, there must be ample evidence supporting the necessity for the City to expand its annexed area before the Commission and/or Council approves an annexation request. Specifically, Ordinance 11-15-11 lists the following questions (shown in bold) that must be adequately answered for each property. Staffs analysis of each required finding is below each item (shown in italics): A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment; There are several Comprehensive Plan policies that both support and do not support this proposed annexation. Since the preliminary plat was submitted with the annexation, Staff considered both the annexation request and the plat together in this analysis. Comprehensive Plan policies that support the annexation/plat are: • The subject property is designated as Single Family Residential on the Land Use Map of the current Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant is requesting an R-4 zone, which complies with the single family designation. • "Encourage new development ...of higher -density development within the Old Town area and lower -density development in outlying areas. " (Land Use Chapter, 1.4U) • "Encourage residential developments to provide adequate easements for future pathways. " (Transportation Chapter, 1.919 • "Link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities. " (Parks Chapter, 3.1. e) • "Through subdivision review, annexation and zoning, emphasize the establishment of connecting trails and open space networks. " (Parks Chapter, 3.4(9 • "Encourage landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors. " (Community Design Chapter, 4.4 U) Comprehensive Plan policies that do not support the annexation/plat are: • "School sites should be reserved for future acquisition in advance of development of planned land use. Approval of subdivision plats may be withheld if adequate school facilities or sites are not available to serve the proposed subdivision. " (Schools Chapter, 3.3) AZ -00-019, PP -00.018 Cedar Springs.az.PP Mayor, Council and P&* . October 6, 2000 Page 3 • "Support a variety of residential categories ...for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. " (Land Use Chapter, 2.1 U) • "Although it is recognized that urbanized development does exist within the rural areas of the Area of City Impact, the rural lands should be kept in agricultural production as long as possible until urban services (municipal sewer and water facilities and other essential services) can be provided" (Land Use Chapter, 6.3). • "All development in the USPA shall be required to connect to the municipal sewer system. " (Public Services Chapter, 5.5) • "Police protection within the city limits. ..should be maintained according to the recommended service ratio of 1.6 to 1.8 police officers per 1,000 persons. " (Public Services Chapter, 6.8) • "Maintain a five-minute or less response time goal to all fire, police, and medical emergencies within the City. " (Public Service Chapter, 6.911) • "The City of Meridian intends to provide a wide diversity of housing types and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. " (Housing Chapter, 1.1) • "Housing proposals shall be phased with ... public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. " (Housing Chapter, 1.6) • "Residential developments shall be phased in accordance with their connection to the municipal sewer system. " (Housing Chapter, 1.7) • "High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. " (Housing Chapter, 1.19) B. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; The Parks Department has completed a master plan for the 56 -acre park southeast of the subject parcels, so the City anticipates an imminent change of use in this general vicinity from the existing dominant agricultural uses. Rezoning of land in this area is certainly feasible. A residential zone adjacent to the park is also feasible. However, Staff feel the last Housing policy cited above (1.19) which encourages higher density housing immediately adjacent to open spaces would be more suitable than the proposed single family homes that put their rear lots up to the park with very limited access into the park. C. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az. pp Mayor, Council and P&O . October 6, 2000 Page 4 Staff recognizes that the "essential character of the area" will change in the near future and that the change will involve some form of residential development. As noted above and as noted by the Applicant, housing is certainly compatible with the park use. D. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Single family housing would not be hazardous or disturbing to the future park users or to the rural residences to the west. The only possible disturbance may be with the agricultural uses to the north, which could be adequately addressed through the Right -to - Farm clause in Idaho State Code. E. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; Sewer Facilities: The Public Facilities Plan shows that the proposed subdivision would be sewered via the new White Drain Trunk, which is being designed at this time. The Trunk alignment is totally dependent on whether or not the subdivision layout of the future Bridgetower Subdivision on the east side of Ten Mile, north of Ustick, is satisfactory to the City, ACRD, the irrigation district and other agencies. If this future phase of Bridgetower is approved (which has not even been submitted to the City yet), the Public Works Department would probably proceed with surveying and easements along the proposed route. They would probably require 3 to 4 months of design time followed by 6 or so months of construction. The Public Works Department anticipates the trunk being completed by the end of 2001, assuming a relatively smooth approval process. Since the Bridgetower Subdivision layout is so critical to the future White Trunk, and given the City has not received a formal application on the subdivision yet, Staff feels it is pre- mature to annex the proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision until the White Trunk alignment is better known and easements have been obtained by the City. None of the proposed subdivision can be sewered into existing sewer. All of it, along with the park, must be sewered to the White Trunk. School Facilities: The Generalized Land Use Map in the 1993 Comprehensive Plan shows a school symbol on the parcel immediately west of the subject parcel. Staff's interpretation of the symbols for parks and schools on the map has been they should ultimately be located somewhere in the vicinity in order to serve a square mile radius. In other words, they serve as indicators/reminders to begin discussions and/or negotiations for specific school sites in that Section and general area when the population growth demands it. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&O October 6, 2000 Page 5 Policy 3.3, pg. 14, of the School Facilities Chapter states, "School sites should be reserved for future acquisition in advance of development of planned land use. Approval of subdivision plats may be withheld if adequate school facilities or sites are not available to serve the proposed subdivision. " In their September 22, 2000 comment letter regarding Cedar Springs Subdivision, Wendel Bigham of the School District states that Andrus Elementary School is over capacity and both Meridian Middle School and Eagle High School are at capacity. He also states that before the District could support this subdivision, they would need land dedicated or made available to the District. To Staff's understanding, the Applicant has not negotiated such agreements with the School District. The District's estimate is that, at build -out, Cedar Springs would add approximately 270 total students to the district's schools. Some evidence should be presented to the City that the Applicant and the District have some agreements in place to address this issue. Roadway Capacity: Per the Applicant's traffic study, by 2005 (the project's horizon year), this subdivision added to projected growth in the area is estimated to deteriorate the intersection at Meridian Ustick Roads to a Level of Service "E. " With growth only (not considering the subdivision), the LOS is projected to be "C. " Neither Meridian Road or Ustick Road are in the ACHD Five-year Work Program for improvements or widening. Also, neither arterial is listed in the draft Destination 2020 Plan for widening through the year 2020. Also, the traffic study uses an annual growth rate of 3.36%. However, the City's comprehensive plan consultant (Dale Rosebrock) estimates Meridian's annual growth rate over the next 5 years to be approximately 5.1 %. Given the pending construction of the White Drain trunk line, Staff feels the 3.36% figure is probably low and, therefore, even more traffic could be seen along the arterials north of Ustick, between Ten Mile and Locust Grove. Fire and Emergency Medical Services: Policy 6.9U, pg. 42, of the Public Services Chapter, states "Maintain a five-minute or less response time goal to all fire, police, and medical emergencies within the City. " Staff questions if this goal can be achieved for paramedics originating from St. Luke's Hospital or for the Fire Department until the Fire Department until the new substation on Ten Mile Road is constructed. F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; The proposed subdivision would certainly not create any more additional requirements or demands to the City than other residential uses. The primary question is one of timing. Until the White Drain Trunk is constructed, sanitary sewer service is not available for this development. G. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.azpp Mayor, Council and P&O October 6, 2000 Page 6 The additional traffic contributed by a 333 -house subdivision would certainly add to the adjacent roadway's congestion. However, there would also be a potential reduction in daily trips for recreation purposes given the close proximity of the City park. It would not likely be any more "excessive " than other residential uses or densities. H. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Until the City receives a report from ACHD, this finding is difficult to calculate. The ACHD Commission's hearing date on Cedar Springs has, of this report, not been scheduled. Staff recommends any decision on this application be tabled until a final ACHD report is available. I. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and None foreseeable. J. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992) As noted above, Housing Diversity and Affordability are two issues addressed consistently in the Comprehensive Plan. The average lot size in the proposed subdivision is 8,961 sf., which is a typical average lot size in other R-4 zoned subdivisions in Meridian. Ashford Greens is 9,105 s f. The average lot size in Turnberry Subdivision is 8,668 sf.. The average proposed lot size in Autumn Faire is 9,132 sf. The dominant zoning (greater than 90%) in Sections 1, 2 and 3 of Township 3N, Range 1 W is R4 (minimum 8, 000 s.f lot sizes). Also, the value range of the houses in Cedar Springs is $125,000 to $175,000, which is within the general range of single family housing stock in Meridian. Staff does not believe the goals of housing diversity and providing housing that meets the needs of all economic levels would be achieved through annexation of this parcel, especially with a straight R-4 zone. Greater choices between housing types (i.e. offering a mix of duplexes, townhomes and single family) is necessary, especially in this northern area of the City. Additionally, the proposed development does not offer any features to complement the future City park and does not comply with the proposed landscape ordinance, which will require that a minimum of five percent of the gross land area be designated as open space. As the applicant is requesting annexation, the City is free to impose additional standards as a condition of annexation. Annexation Recommendation Arguments can be made on both sides regarding annexation of this parcel. It meets the essential requirements of contiguity and is in the Urban Service Planning Area. It's important to point out that the above findings and policies carry different weight and should not be viewed solely on the basis of the number of policies that support or don't support. However, Staffs interpretation of AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az pp Mayor, Council and P&S . October 6, 2000 Page 7 the Land Use Planning Act, Comprehensive Plan policies and required findings of the Zoning & Development Ordinance is that the size and scope of this annexation request does not fulfill the intent of these guiding policies and the annexation should not be granted at this time. Should the Commission and/or Council choose to annex, Staff recommends that, at a minimum, a cost benefit analysis be prepared by the Applicant detailing the overall projected costs to the City to serve the new homes and how this subdivision benefits the community as a whole if it were annexed. (Comp Plan policy #1.9U of the Housing Chapter states that the City will consider areas for annexation when it is demonstrated through such studies that the City will benefit.) PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS Since Staff is recommending denial of the annexation request, no comments are provided on the preliminary plat application at this time other than those comprehensive plan policies that pertain to plats and subdivisions cited above. Preliminary Plat Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the preliminary plat application. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp 09/29/2000 15:18 2088885052 SANITARY SERVICE PAGE 04 MAYOR HUS HUS OF TREASURE VALLEY Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live DEPARTMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (:08) 887.2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884.5533 - Fax 888.6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date:ho Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No.: AZ -00-019 Request: Annenation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless. C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department Your Concise Remarks: City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications ony) Gen - 26 PP FP!PFP . 30 AZ - 27 SEP 29 '00 15:27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County ation) Idaho Trap6p(Vati6n Department SEP 2 9 7.000 CI'T'Y OF IV1ERIDTAIN 2oeeee5052 Preparing iZO O Today's . Students for n Tomorrow's Challenges. S e•Fo9/e. Mer�d�°�. SUPERINTENDENT Christine H. Donnell September 22, 2000 Joint School District No. 2 911 Meridian Street • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • (208) 888-6701 • Fax (208) 888-6700 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Councilmen: FXcErNrED SEP 2 6 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN Enclosed for your review is general information relative to schools located in the proposed project area. If you have any questions, please contact Wendel Bigham at 888-6701. Reference: Cedar Springs Subdivision Elementary School: Andrus Elementary School Middle School: Meridian Middle School High School: Eagle High School Comments and/or Recommendations: Andrus Elementary School is over capacity. The school district is currently busing students from new developments to schools outside Andrus Elementary's attendance boundary. Eagle Middle School is at capacity. Eagle High School is at capacity. We can predict that these homes, when completed, will house one hundred thirteen (113) elementary aged children, eighty-one (81) middle school aged children, and seventy-six (76) senior high aged students. The Meridian School District is not opposed to growth in our district, however this subdivision will cause increased overcrowding in all three schools. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land dedicated to the district or at least made available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer service available. Sincerely, Wendel Bigham, Supervisor of Facilities and Construction cl CENTRAL DISTRICT CENTRXI DISTRICT HEALTH DEP TMENT HEALTH Environmental Health Division Return to: DEPARTMENT ❑ Boise 1?FcF-1-vED ❑ Eagle Rezone QG� -Cj�� SEP 2 6 2000 ❑ Garden City Conditional Use # GIN OF MEWD-14—NI Meridian Preliminary / Final / Short Plat ❑ Kuna ❑ ACZ ❑ Star 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics ❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other ❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ❑ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well ❑ interim sewage ❑ central water ❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water ❑ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water ❑ sewage dry lines ❑ central water ❑ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center ❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store ❑ 14. Date:.9 Reviewed By:��� CDHDW1kc Review Sheet TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: ''` � f �t d Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No.: AZ -00-01§___U Request: Annexzation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Reside, Com -20 PP/FP/PFP-30 AZ -27 northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig, District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department 1_0/90d b17L&tPQ9&7=QI H91VM719HM NHIQIHRW gS:bT 00-S aT:9l 00, SE d3S KUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Give LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY Off' MERIDIAN 1208)CITX PUB 3 2501 COUNCIL MEMBERSBERS C WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO $3642 (208) 887-27,11 - Fax SS7-t297 Tammy deWecrd (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 854.5533 - Fax 838-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: ''` � f �t d Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No.: AZ -00-01§___U Request: Annexzation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Reside, Com -20 PP/FP/PFP-30 AZ -27 northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig, District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department 1_0/90d b17L&tPQ9&7=QI H91VM719HM NHIQIHRW gS:bT 00-S HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 836E C E I VELl 887 2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887- NNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218��� ry 2 DEPARTMENT L 2000 (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK nFFICE TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date:, aO; Hearing Date: File No.: AZ -00-019 October 10, 2000 Request: Annexzation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro. P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Your Concise Remarks: q—,:;2, /` o City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 dA.1) MAYOR Robert D. Com HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN LEGAL DEPARTMENTe (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: /Z PPI90 Hearing Date: File No.: AZ -00-019 October 10, 2000 Request: Annexzation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Come, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C ><-_ Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Gen -26 PP/FP/PFP-30 AZ -27 f?]ECEIVEI) SEP 2 1 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN RECEIVED SEP 1 9 2000 Meridian City Water Superintendent MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, Transmittal Date: �t; Hearing Date: File No.: AZ -00-019 2000 October 10, 2000 Request: Annexzation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Your Concise Remarks: Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY rl FRK 0PFIrE cE�D SEP 2 9 2000 CITY OF NIERIDLAIN 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 September 25 2000 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Will Berg, City Clerk Meridian City Hall 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Re: AZ -00-019 / PP -00-018 Proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision Dear Commissioners: The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. Contact Donna Moore at 466-7861 for further information. The District has no comment regarding the annexation and zoning on the proposed project. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. All municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. Sincerely, Bil�on Asst.Water P Su erintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT BH:dln Cc, File — Shop File - Office Water Superintendent APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 E 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 26 September 2000 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 " Matthew B. Schultz SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 a:,�,�� J -U -B Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Avenue Boise, ID 83709 RE: Land Use Change Application - _Cedar Springs Subdivision Dear Mr. Schultz: / 7 -00 - 0 l9/ jP - 00-0 1g Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above -referenced development. If this development is under a "rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application. Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned, operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P. Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's office, or John P. Anderson, at the District's shop. Sincerely, Donna N. Moore, Assistant Secretary/Treasurer cc: File Water Superintendent Kevin Howell Development Leslie Family Trust/Moore Family Trust City of Meridian enc. APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 ** TX CONFIASON REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 01 01/16 07:57 PUBLIC WORKS 02 01/16 07:513 LEGAL DEPARTMENT 03 01/16 07:59 206 85S 6854 AS OF JAN 16-07:59 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS OF --S 00'11" 001 154 OK EC --S 00'23" 001 154 OK EC --S 00'20" 001 154 OK RECEIVED JAN 12 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN '91104&ase Dart 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651.4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 January 10, 2001 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampo 466-7861 Will Berg, City Clerk SHOP: Nampo 466.0663 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83042 Re: PP 00-018 Revision of Preliminary Plat for Cedar Springs Subdivision Dear Commissioners: The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no facilities within the area for the above- mentioned project, However, the District has two concerns, one being who will be operating and maintaining the pressure system and the second being, will the storm drainage be retained on site? If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me, Sincerely, Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT BH: din Cc: File — Shop File — Office Water Superintendent APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 8015E PROJECT RIGHTS • 40,000 ** TX CONFIROON REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 05 01/10 12:54 PUBLIC WORKS 06 01/10 12:55 LEGAL DEPARTMENT 07 01/10 12:56 208 888 6854 AS OF JAN 10 -12:56 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS OF --S 00'17" 001 051 OK EC --S 00'32" 001 051 OK EC --S 00'26" 001 051 OK WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your Mme w a,-,; ;,,,,,,�„vai;:r;�w„Far.� n),, a Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Men f C3K4J=''� - Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P2 Richard Hatcher, P2 Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer North of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Inig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Your Concise Remarks: A.,—, City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) G- -2t PPIFPIPFP • 30 AZ - 27 RECEIVED JAN 10 2001 CITY OF 1V muDDIAN HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR LEGAL DEPAR'1MEN7 Robcn D. Corrie A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288.2501 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Kciih Bird (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Tammy dcWeerd City Clerk Office Fix (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT Cheric McCandless (206) 884-5533 - Fax 888.6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your Mme w a,-,; ;,,,,,,�„vai;:r;�w„Far.� n),, a Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Men f C3K4J=''� - Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P2 Richard Hatcher, P2 Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer North of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Inig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Your Concise Remarks: A.,—, City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) G- -2t PPIFPIPFP • 30 AZ - 27 RECEIVED JAN 10 2001 CITY OF 1V muDDIAN NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on October 10, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Kevin Howell for Annexation And Zoning of 110.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision; Furthermore, the applicant also requests Preliminary Plat approval of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision generally located northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 18th day of September, 2000 A WILLIAM G.Bl JAR., Y ERK PUBLISH September 29, 2000 and October 6, 2000 SEAL - op -913, ����. •� NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on October 10, 2000, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the applications of: Sam Fishel for a modification of the existing Conditional Use Permit to reduce front landscape setback generally located west of Meridian Road on Franklin Road; Kevin Howell for Annexation and Zoning of 110.71 acres from RT and R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision; furthermore, the applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision generally located northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Road; Dale Ownby for Annexation and Zoning of 34.84 acres from RT to R-8 for a proposed church and vacant land generally located on Meridian Road south of Overland Road. PUBLISH September 29, 2000 and October 6, 2000 ** TX CONFIRM -)N REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 03 09/20 10:07 3776309 AS OF SEP 20 W 10:07 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS EC --S 00'21" 001 231 OK NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on October 10, 2000, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the applications of. Sam Fishel for a modification of the existing Conditional Use Permit to reduce front landscape setback generally located west of Meridian Road on Franklin Road; Kevin Howell for Annexation and Zoning of 110.71 acres from RT and R-4 for Proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision; furthermore, the applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision generally located northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Road; Dale Ownby for Annexation and Zoning of 34.84 acres from RT to R-8 for a proposed church and vacant land generally located on Meridian Road south of Overland Road. PUBLISH September 29, 2000 and October 6, 2000 v T O 3 W co V v co -4 Wcl Ul A W N 1 cn v ` Q c 3 �Q zD T ID C Lrl N O D n d (D — G Z C C <cl N Q N d N sa O 1O� A a m m ti r a u m _ fD m Q� '` S� _ m %� of 2 Sp al `� ¢° '9 O 0 20 20 20 p N 7C� r N 7 O C aN C 3 i a W N IO I O P o a � d o c m w ct 2 a r (n W $ r r r O W r 00 O O p cfDTc S b $ tD 00 Ln O 00 O Ln N m O Z — Im W p� 3' 00 � -0 'cu IT, v�I C G7 ,Q D a G C m G y 6 C< G m O Cce n ry � EIR o v � < n y o o x o= m m 0 3 0 0 3 0 v ccr �a3a m G (-)C/7 O� cn m o mN�oa 1 a iuiPELCDm ° ° Q m v _ m 3 cm M 3�N5D N g m o 3 N T cn d 7 d = I T � 7 a O N a m `3Sm?x 53. c o m 3 O •.c O j m m n I G m� T CO T O W co V V On kF O a A ' I a Cn I A W N I p CD c I V p U7 A I W N --. > m nZi a 3 (T CD C7 m n y D) N� O. 0-1 O m 10 m z > a_ N G Z C n C a 3 N W Q 0 o m Om _ m �c m n N 0c ' 3.3 m _ co d v c $ 20 Pq 90 a fD (D H nZi n fD C 0 o ❑❑❑ ❑ o J N O a 0 y O co CD b UY m a O Ln tD t cty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ d o ,n �_ (D C y CD �tO30om ' a m -' 7 y C O p ❑ ❑ �m (D 0 as y = 7 0 Z ° 3N�oCd I a Q a n c ro m B D D o °- oo �7-1 � .A N N ? N � 37 ma m fAN Nry m7a I � O � O tv W n0 K y m 7 d t0, C _Q CD G V n .m � 7�n- I I I _ 7 C C -0 n r Ill O O D 7 m T [n ill O 3 72 CD o n F ff m F c I CD b l7 _ m- c CD o jpj ^ m �O 3 7 O c cn n D' I On kF O a A ' 7 - April 13, 2001 • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 17, 2001 APPLICANT J -U -B Engineers ITEM NO. 12 REQUEST Preliminary Plat approval for 268 building lots and 27 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision - n/o Ustick Road and w/o Meridian Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See P & Z Item Packet CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: See attached Recommendations OTHER: Contacted: - ci,4- ylor M(A- ' cS k� Date: 4/13/01 Phone: 376-7330 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. POSITION STATEMENT Case No. PP -00-018 Name of Applicant: Cedar Springs To: Meridian City Council From: Meridian Planning & Zoning Staff k�,� \,\4. 1 ( i 12-- iRE CEIVE D APR 15 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE I have reviewed the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission with which I disagree as follows: The following Findings and/or Recommendations should be deleted: §§ Recommendation 6 (pg. 3): (This discrepancy clarified in ACHD's revised report) §§ Recommendation 7 (pg. 4): (This discrepancy clarified in ACHD's revised report) § § Recommendation 9 (pg. 4): (Already included in revised plat) The following Findings and/or Recommendations should be modified: (recommended deletionsstr-u&�) (recommended corrections/additions in bold) § 7 (pg. 1-2): The applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: develop a 33-3 264 buildable single-family lots and 25 common lots subdivision. § Recommendation 5 (pg. 3): 3rd line of paragraph —. . . However, there are no easement delineations or notes explaining this area. Applicant shall add easement delineations to preliminary plat. Applicant hear-ing hear-their-ntentions r these c -49 -43 -1 -m. -Aft .10% the SetIt'.1 District conditions fef use of this faeility, and haw feneing along the easement w 11 be hand—1 intends to construct perimeter fencing on the Settlers easement line. § 11 Recommendation: Last 3 lines ofparagraph -- ...Representatives from the P&R Commission intend to testify at the P&Z COffiffli-SiAll City Council hearing on this matter. The Planning and Zoning Commission does not recommend the single -loaded street design. Dated this 13f day of. 61 , 2001. Signed: Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. Received in the record By: William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk -&7/"lZ Gamow 101 Eagle Olen Lane, Suite A Eagle, Idaho 83616 Attorney at Law, P.A. Admitted to Practice in Idaho 8: California RECEIVED APR 17 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Telephone: (208) 939-2600 Facsimile: (208) 939-2692 NUMBER OF PAGES BEING TRANSMITTED - 2 IF ALL PAGES ARE NOT RECEIVED, PLEASE TELEPHONE MARY AT (208) 9342692 TRAE SENM 4. IS P.M. T1IE ORIGINAL OF THIS TELF.COPY WILL BE SENT BY REGULAR MAIL FAX NUMBERc (208) 888-4218 FAX NUMBER: (208) 2W2S01 April 17, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Cedar Springs Annexation and Preliminary Plat Applications Case No. AZ -00-019 Case No. PP -00-018 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: This office represents John Kennedy who owns property adjacent to the northwest corner of the proposed Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision. Mr. Kennedy brought this proposed plat to my attention today with concerns regarding access to his property. I am enclosing with this letter a copy of the 1908 Deed which established the public right-of-way for what is now designated as North Venable Lane. As you will note, the right-of- way extends the full length of what is now proposed as the Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision. However, the preliminary plat being submitted in connection with this property only provides for Venable Lane to extend about two-thirds of the way toward the north end of the property. This will leave my client's property essentially landlocked. For that reason, Mr. Kennedy vehemently opposes the approval of this subdivision as submitted. APR 17 '01 16:02 Mayor and Members of the Meridian City council April 17, 2001 Page 2 Although T will be unable to attend the hearing this evening on this issue, Z do believe that it is very important for the city not to approve this subdivision which will leave my client essentially landlocked. Mr. Kennedy hopes to be able to attend the meeting this evening. He will be happy to answer any questions which you might wish to submit to him at that time. Thank you for your consideration of this important issue. Very truly ours, Barry P tens BP:mmg Enclosure cc: John Kennedy RP.ALMRIMS73 A "0S. L03 APR 17 '01 15=02 016mant U04306 at U. to Tse Pobl'csae s MahmW.. . Z F�tt7J'j Zb 9;o F1■ .1C Nurber 191`53. Tars I1MMTt". 1la4s this 21st. day of larch in t1s year or our Lord me taoueand hitu hun4rsd sad sigbt SE'M TdP Clamant Hedges and QUa.A.Hedgae un'utvband'sni wife of larldian C°tr or Ada'. etwte or Idaho the parties or the flret part, anLha 1'ublio for * d public 1'1*r , of County or Ada, auto or Idaho the partieG of the 0 PUpact; elm W 2l17MUPR, That t2ri Bald party of the first Part, for and 1n conaldsrebion of the sup of ons and nq/100 DOGGAR9 of thG United States or America, to tbo>t Snhanq Paid by the Raid partia" or the second part, the recsi t whereof la horeby acknowledgsd ha... EEK9ED, REI.EA9RD &&I IP P CUIT_CLAI7dED, and DY those prosehta do... AEXSE, RFI EASE AND forever QUITQ,ALIf imt° the said part.... of the second part, and to their hobs and ae"lgn" all the t011owing described real estate altuat♦ in tforever and bounded and he County of Ada, and State of Idaho, k�+cti0ularly dsearibed de follow" to wit: A strip or 1prjd twenty nine(2, foot wide off of tha Beat alde of the east half (E4) or the FbLat;half (E j or the Southwest Quarter (81[�) of Section Thi rty nix (36) township four (4) north or range ane (1) wast B.H. of thereunt pOBT� with all and singular the tenements, bereditasanto and e and rew♦indere tents, lsin ,%�awAM appertaining, rofit$ therreof. . the reversion Ahd rovereion°e,nraeai•utar ansa unto thea vp Ard) TO ROGD, All and eingylsr the said premises to t ps.rtlsa'of the eso0nd part, and to their he1Rn and er with the appnrten Ip ViTNHW MHEREO) assign* forever. earl seals the r Tb said parties of the first part have hersutsto tot hands Y" and year fiRst above written. Signed, eealad and dollverad in the presence or x.C.9[aokburn j Clement Red,See (Swo STATE or IDAn ) ( P. Lis'a.A.Ra(Iges, (WATj) COMY OF ADA ss , On tbls 21st day of 1kroh 1900 borore rte'M. In and for Bald County ysrvonally appeere4 Clement Had C.Blaokburn a Notary ,Public *ire kno4c to er to be the pereone whose namaa ere Bas °M aisa.A.Ho a tad acknowledged to me that t et►beorlberi to the within busbaM add they oseouted the Gama hin Instrument, rXWrTN thday &8 e11rt MH the d.09, I have hereunto Got My hand And affixed ray official Geal yFREear in this osrlirioate first above written. . NO"'Public W-Coft1valcu expires Ysy 1, 3.910 . �A'C.soktvl'n *corded at the request of 1N.0.81sokburn at 9:50 e.a. Noh 25, 19o(i. Pee -11:20.c 7Y7� f &--Vtv� Recorder. APR 17 '01 16:03 Tammy de Weerd, Meridian City Council 2090 W. Chateau Drive Meridian, ID 83642 (208) 887-3747 MEMORANDUM RECEIVED APR 15 2001 TO: Mayor Corrie and City Council Members CITY OF MERIDIAN FROM: Tanury de Weerd DATE: April 15, 2001 RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision As you all are aware, I will not be present for the City Council meeting this Tuesday, April 17 at which the City is to consider the proposal for Cedar Springs Subdivision. There are a number of issues with this subdivision that I am sure staff will raise in their comments, but I feel strongly about one item in particular that I wanted to comment on. While I question the timing of this application in light of the delivery of city services (sewer and safety services) and the mixed-use issues that most likely will be addressed with the comprehensive plan update and/or the planned development ordinance currently in the public hearing stage, this issue is also one of policy. This proposed subdivision surrounds, on two sides, our City's largest park that will begin development of Phase I this summer. This will be our City's premier park and most likely will be the only one of this size. This is an important amenity of the City and it's citizens and safety and design is of utmost importance. The proposal submitted has development abutting both sides of this park to the west and north. I share the sentiments of staff (Parks, P&Z, Fire, Police) and the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommended policy to keep parks of this size open with frontage roads on at least three of the four sides of the park. Ustick and Meridian Roads keep the park open to the south and east, and for safety reasons, either the west or the north side should remain open, with a frontage road, to the park as well. Cedar Springs as designed, with the proposed school site and business or multi -family to the west, and the houses backed up to the park on the north, creates a huge safety concern and vision handicap. Please consider this policy and safety aspect in the decision process for the proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision. Thank you for considering these comments in your recommendation. 0 Will Berg From: TdeWeerd@aol.com Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 2:11 PM To: bergw@ci. meridian. id.us; andersonr@ci.nampa.id.us; rackem@gwest.net; cherie919@gwest.net; corrieb@ci.meridian. id. us Cc: stiless@ci. meridian. id. us; kuntzt@ci.meridian.id.us Subject: RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision comments Hi all, I have attached a memo with my comments regarding Cedar Springs Subdivision that will be heard at the City Council meeting on Tuesday. Will, if you could make sure hard copies are made to the appropriate people I would appreciate it tremendously. Thanks for allowing the ability to share my comments on this proposal. Have a good meeting. Tammy 4/16/01 0 Memo To: Mayor Corrie and Council From Tom Kuntz I I CC: Shari Stiles, P&R Commission Date: 04/13/2001 Re: Cedar Springs — Single loaded street RECEIVED APR 13 2001 CITY OF MERIDUN The Parks and Recreation Commission and staff do not agree with the Planning and Zoning Commissions approval of the Cedar Springs Subdivision without resolving the single loaded street issue. Our recommendation on this issue was outlined in a memo dated February 14, 2001, and a follow up memo was distributed on March 14, 2001 outlining our attempt to reach a compromise with the developer. (see March 14t�' memo attached) Staff and commission consider it essential that a single loaded street (no yard backing up to the park) be required on the southern boundary of the Cedar Springs Subdivision. The single loaded street will provide access and visibility into the secluded back corner of the 58 Acre park for our Police Officers. The skate park is a good example of the current emphasis the Council has placed on safety related to visibility into parks. This is the first park of this size to be developed in Meridian and we appreciate your support in resolving this issue. 0 Meridian Parks & Recreation RECEIVED 2001 Memo '.ID�AN CITY OF �rIE To: Planning and Zoning Commission, Mayor Corrie, City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission From: Tom Kuntz T� Date: 03-14-01 Re: Negotiation of single loaded street in Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction At the Eebalafy 15 Planning and Zoning meeting, the Commission recommended the City Parks Department meet with the developer of Cedar Springs Subdivision to resolve the single loaded street issue. On February 22, the Parks staff met with representatives from JUB and the developer to discuss possible solutions to the street issue. At the conclusion of the meeting, two options were left on the table without a viable compromise. The Parks Staff recommends the developer combine eight to ten existing lots into one common lot along the northwest park boundary (,tee attachment A). This common lot would help the developer meet the 5% open space requirement, and address the Parks Department's concerns about visibility and safety in the park. The developer did not support this recommendation due to traffic concerns. The Parks staff believes the developers concerns about increased traffic could be mitigated by prohibiting on street parking on the south side of Alexis Drive. In exchange for a single loaded street, the developer offered to construct a road from the North Venable Lane into the northwest comer of the park. The Park staff does not support this option for three reasons; (1) the building lots on Alexis Drive would be bordered on two sides by a street or parking lot (,attachment b1. This is prohibited by City Ordinance #12-4-5 (which states all blocks shall be two-tier, i.e. no double frontages). (2) This would invite more traffic than the single loaded street. (3) It would not meet the original purpose of a single loaded street which was to provide law enforcement the opportunity to perform 'drive by views' from an adjacent public street into the northwest comer of the park. * Page 1 • Thi developer declined the opt to meet with the Park.-, Staff a SPmnd time, to resolve this issue. Without an acceptable compromise to the single loaded street issue, the Parks and Recreation staff recommends denial of the cedar Springs subdivision application for annexation and preliminary plat. 0 Page 2 .�� ... �.. NOWWWALO M TDMOM MUM NOIst cons M1N3atm soMldds bY= "AN Ivid AHVN nniud �[�! f, f=�'trJi't �1� ' ,,� , � ;! i� ■��� f ! jjlii � !1!i all { j f #1., ;JAI 11 '{ JIM .1�.�.�.r. :li,lt � i rir I I 1 � t i ' • ■ ' e r 'b Ir � •� A Y M� J Y I� I It 1 .t .t -� • ■�• i.i t -� ■� .. i, i l I >.� •�•> .^ i w. ' , ■ it I >\` / °■� '`�, • it I I': i I —•- — _ � , .1 A raj � ,— i � •"` `.. .1 ..1 � i .. it j� � oa i • a Zm 1� r -+• -i � i I � Q •• • i ' i�' ilii .i ` r > .� i I !=� i�• Ali' ii' i �i 1 I 711 1i iI i . i i loln"iaM xt I 1 ' 1,7 ':i' 'i •t •i -i -� Ai ' i i� �i : i I'iwi •.��� ��Iii ,�I '! t I I. MCLLind1SmW TGAR464 NAM =11 NormucBnS TAIN301M S'UMUdS UV= �seL� � ftft f• fi �'� t �!I • 4! rrs ',� !�lff lJ, 1 1 ss X 111 I } fly /1 ■ M r • !1 pp I+1 i 1 x i f i#�!i�: {I fit:#�I.I f �! :i ; j!si loll "j � _ �— _ —� _ — _ _.•O1 wOOn M o I a � � A � ■ • i ' Q� � YY4 j • •fib � � i •i -i •i -il- I 171 - .. l i• i .i �, ., A A j .� i •i '� ; IIAI I I�I� a IF • A I..I 11— ,� A I ,1 Y • - 'i -•i vi^ice■� ♦ A 9 171 I A 41 Java t !:� r � A��' All • I -I .I � I'; I I _ I "I -i -i •i -i I 'I ( '7I : I •I'_ I .I .i ,i .I .I74 .t •I • I� '-i 1 rIw 3 �'!! • I �' •i �i �i �i �i �i �i �i .I' I i I April 12, 2001 Will Berg, City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 RE Dear Mr. Berg: RECEIVED J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. EIVED ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS APR 13 2001 Regional Office 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 CITY OF MERIDIAN Boise, ID 83709-0944 208-376-7330 Fax: 208-323-9336 Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision Annexation and Preliminary Plat Applications On behalf of my client, Kevin Howell Development, we are requesting a continuance for the annexation and preliminary plat applications scheduled at Meridian City Council on April 17, 2001. We will require time to discuss some issues recently brought to our attention by staff. Please continue these items to the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting. Contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Matthew B. Schultz, P. . Project Engineer MBS: the cc: Kevin Howell, Kevin Howell Development f:\projects\11644\admin\continue request.doc U April 12, 2001 Will Berg, City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 10 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS - PLANNERS Regional Office 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208-376-7330 Fax: 208-323-9336 RECEIVED APR 12 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN RE: Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision Annexation and Preliminary Plat Applications Dear Mr. Berg: On behalf of my client, Kevin Howell Development, we are requesting a continuance for the annexation and preliminary plat applications scheduled at Meridian City Council on April 17, 2001. We will require time to discuss some issues recently brought to our attention by staff. Please continue these items to the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting. Contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, J -IJ -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Matthew B. Schultz, P. . Project Engineer MBS:Ihc cc: Kevin Howell, Kevin Howell Development f:\projects\11644\admin\continue request.doc ni APR 12 '01 11:50 rasa z�z gzzc o�r� �- i V J • J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 FAX: 208/323-9336 208/376-7330 TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSMITTAL TO: Will Berg, City Clerk COMPANY: City of Meridian FAX NUMBER: 887-481 FROM: Matt Schultz SUBJECT: Date: 4/12/01 Time: Pages (including this page): Z 1 J -U -B Project No. If you do not receive all of the pages, please call 208/376-7330, or notify by FAX: 208/323-9336. APR 12 101 11:5o 208 323 9336 PAGE.01 0 • WHITE PETERSON WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIGRAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. KEVIN E. DINIUS CHRISTOPHER S. NYE JULIE KLEIN FlscBER PHILIP A. PETERSON Wm. F. GIGRAY, 11I ERIC S. RossMAN BRENT J. JOHNSON TODD A. RossMAN D. SAMUEL JOHNSON DAVID M. SWARTLEY LARRY D. MOORE TERRENCE R. WHITE** WILLIAM A. MORROW NICHOLAS L. WOLLEN WILLIAM F. NICHOLS* *Also admitted in OR ** Also admitted in To: Staff Applicant Affected Property Owner(s) Re: Application Case No ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 EAST CARLTON AvE., SIIrrE 31 POST OFFICE Box1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL (208) 288-2499 FAX (208) 288*2501 E-MAIL: @wPPMG.coM April 2, 2001 NAWA OFFICE 5700 E FRANKLIN RD., STEL 200 NAMPA, IDAHO SA87-8402 TEL. 208) 466-9272 FAX ( 08)466 4405 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE RECEIVED APR - 2 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these Findins and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the Ety Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must decide, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is important to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings before the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: 1. That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be prepared to state yourposition on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and 2. That you carefully complete (be sure it is legg��'1ble) the Position Statement if you diisagree with the Findings and -Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you prepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. If that is not possible, please present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The copies will be presented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the C ity Attorney. If you are a part of a group, it is strongly recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, which can be signed by the representative for the group. Very truly yours, City Attorney's Office n/ BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION, KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION, Applicant Case No. PP --00-018 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 1. The property is approximately 99.83 acres in size and is generally located at the northwest corner of Meridian and Ustick Roads on the north and west sides of the future 56 -acre City Park in Meridian, Idaho. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is the Leslie Family Trust and Moore Family Trust of Eagle. 3. The Applicant is Kevin Howell Construction of Boise, Idaho. 4. The subject property is currently zoned RUT. However, there is an application before the City Council for annexation and zoning to R-4. The zoning of R-4 is defined within the City of Meridian's Zoning and Development Ordinance Section 11-7-2. 5. The subject property is within the city limits of the City of Meridian. 6. The entire parcel is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 7. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION w • manner: develop a 333 buildable single family lots and 25 common lots subdivision. 8. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. RECOMMENDATION 1. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the preliminary plat as requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application, subject to the following: Adopt the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Assistant City Engineer Recommendations as follows: Sanitary sewer service to this development will have to be provided by the future White Trunk Sewer. The Trunk alignment/construction is totally dependent on whether or not the subdivision layout of the future Bridgetower Subdivision on the east side of Ten Mile, north of Ustick, is satisfactory to the City, ACHD, the irrigation district and other agencies, and that the appropriate easements can be obtained. If this future phase of Bridgetower is approved (which will be reviewed at the 3-15-01 P&Z Commission hearing), the Public Worlcs Department would proceed with surveying and easements procurement along the proposed route. Approximately 3 to 4 months of design time, followed by 6 or so months of construction is expected. The Public Works Department anticipates the trunk being completed by the end of 2001, assuming a relatively smooth approval process. This proposed development cannot be provided sanitary sewer service by gravity into any other existing city sewer system. When sewer is available, applicant will be responsible to construct sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION 0 • 2. Water service to this development shall be via extensions from the existing main in Ustick Road adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to construct water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Worlcs Department. 3. Underground pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Due to the size of the landscaped areas, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Applicant shall submit a revised plat showing service locations and source for the irrigation water. The irrigation pump station for the subdivision must be located on a common lot, designated as such on the plat. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 4. Applicant shall indicate whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department the as pressurizedpart the d development plan review process, and a copy irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. 5. To date, Settlers Irrigation District has not submitted a response to the preliminary plat transmittal. The plat shows what appears to be a 25 - foot wide irrigation easement along the north property line. However, there are no easement delineations or notes explaining this area. Applicant should clarify at the hearing their intentions for these three common lots, the Settlers Irrigation District conditions for use of this facility, and how fencing along the easement will be handled. 6. ACHD's Site Specific Requirements #7 and # 15 on page 7 of their revised report require conflicting street section widths for N. Venable Lane. One requires a 36 -foot section and the other requires a 40 -foot RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION 0 E section. Applicant should clarify for the record. See revised ACHD requirements below. 7. ACHD's Site Specific Requirement #10 (pg. 7) classifies Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing. The street is required to provide 64 -feet of right-of-way to Greenwich. However, the revised preliminary plat only shows the 64 -foot width to N. Byron Place and then reduces to a 58 - foot right-of-way until Ashby Drive. Applicant should clarify ACHD's condition for the record. If the collector status is required to Greenwich and front -on housing is restricted, 13 lots will not meet the minimum 80 -foot frontage requirement on the connecting local streets. These lots include: Lots 1 and 7, Block 11, Lot 1, Block 12, Lots 1, 18 and 19, Block 6, Lots 16 and 17, Blocic 14, Lot 17, Block 16, and Lots 6-9, Block 5. The Applicant must be prepared to address ACHD's requirement and how these 13 lots will comply with the minimum frontage if they can't front on Ashton Drive. See revised ACHD requirements below. 8. The micropath at the NW corner of the future park must be relocated to the west so it serves the future school site instead of the park. The park master plan does not accommodate a pedestrian access into the park at this location. The Planning and Zoning Commission further recommend that the micropath along the NW corner for pedestrian access shall be for school access only. There shall be a 10 foot paved surface with five feet on each side for landscaping on all walking paths. A fence will be provided along the northwest boundary of the subdivision. The southern edge of the subdivision shall have a fence no more than 54 inches in height. 9. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that an additional micropath be provided at the west end of Block 17, possibly between Lots 7/8 and Lots 24/25, in order to improve pedestrian accessibility from the NW portion of the subdivision to the school and park sites. 10. The Planning and Zoning Commission have some concern about how children residing on the south side of Usticic Road will access the school site at the Venable Lane intersection. While there is currently limited residential in this area, the Comp Plan designates the entire south side of Usticic as single family residential. ACHD is requiring a center turn lane at this intersection but not a signal or crosswalk to facilitate a safe RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION pedestrian crossing. The Applicant and Commission should address this concern at the public hearing. See revised ACHD requirements below. 11. During two different pre -application meetings held with the Applicant and his representatives in July and Age as a000,presented . One possibility of designing W. Ashby D $1e -loaded street concept discussed was townhomes or other higher density housing that would front on the north side of Ashby and the south side would remain open for greater accessibility into the park site. ue to the t the concept. icant cost of re -design, the Applicant was not amenab Subsequently, Tom Kuntz of the Parks Department has also presented the concept to the Applicant's representative. In his 1-29-01 letter to Mr. Kuntz, Matthew Schultz of J -U -B Engineers stated that he felt the design as submitted has many merits and "does not warrant revision. The addition of a single -loaded street along the north boundary (of the park) will require a wholesale revision of the 100 -acre preliminary plat layout." The Parks & Recreation Commission are strongly in favor of having the park accessible from Ashby Drive. Z Commissionehearing on from the PSR Commission intend to testify at t this matter. 12. Three (3) copies of a detailed landscape plan for the street buffers, open space common lots and the Lot 34, Block 1 land use buffer, including a detailed fencing plan, shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the final plat application. The plan must include sizes and species of trees, shrubs, berming/swale details, and all proposed ground cover/treatment. A mix of tree species is required per Ordinance 12-13. No fencing will be permitted within the required landscape buffers. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to City signature on the Final Plat. All required landscaping shall be constructed prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy for the future buildings. All perimeter fencing shall be installed prior to applying for building permits. 13. The Meridian Road and Usticic Road landscape buffers shall be a minimum of 35 feet and 25 feet in width respectively, constructed beyond the required ACHD right-of-way and constructed by the developer as a condition of the plat. The landscape buffers shall be placed in common separate lots as shown. Fencing is not to encroach RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION upon these buffers. 14. Six -foot -high, solid, perimeter fencing shall be required along the full northern and western boundaries of the subdivision, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Director. Fencing adjacent to the future City park, should be determined in coordination with the Parks SL Recreation Department. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. A letter of credit or cash will be required for these fences prior to signature on the final plat. 15. Notes #3 and #8 refer to "Amherst" Subdivision. Correct to read "Cedar Springs." 16. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names with the final plat application. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 17. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 18. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance 12- 5-2.K. 19. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 20. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance No. 12-4-13, except as provided for under site specific requirements. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 21. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 22. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION common landscape areas on the site. 23. Two -hundred -fifty watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 24. Indicate on the final plat map any FEMA Flood Plains affecting the area being platted, and detail plans for reducing or eliminating the boundary. 25. Assessment fees for water and sewer service will be determined during the building plan review process. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) submitted in revised form and received February 22, 2001, as follows: 26. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 27. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Usticic Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 28. Locate any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Usticic Road and Meridian Road outside of the new right-of-way. 29. The two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270 -feet north of the south property line, and 300 -feet south of the north property line, are approved with this application. The entrances shall be designed with two outbound lanes and one inbound lane on either side of a center median, within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4 -feet wide to total a minimum of a 100 -square foot area. 30. Construct center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 7 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION 31. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 32. Construct a center turn lane on Ustick, Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 33. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 34. Construct a segment of Ashton Drive from Meridian Road to Ashby Drive as a residential collector street with no front -on housing. Construct the street as a 36 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 - foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. Parking shall be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. The access restrictions for this street segment shall be stated on the final plat. 35. Construct the segment of Ashby Drive from Meridian Road to the west property line of the office/commercial lot as a 40 -foot street section within 58 -feet of right-of-way. Parking shall be prohibited on this segment of Ashby Drive. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. The access restrictions for this street segment shall be stated on the final plat. 36. Construct three stub streets to the north, located as proposed: • Between Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Blocic 18 • Between Lot 11, Blocic 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 Install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUThRE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. 37. Construct Ashton Lane to the west property line, as proposed. Install a RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. 38. One driveway on Ashby Drive shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial lot. The driveway shall be located a minimum of 100 - feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. 39. One driveway on Venable Lane shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial/multi-family lot. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 100 -feet north of Usticic Road and constructed 24 to 30 - feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. 40. Construct Venable Lane at the west property line from Usticic Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way. To the north of the school site, construct Venable Lane one half of a 36 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement within 42 -feet of right-of- way. 41. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. 42. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. 43. Unless otherwise specified, construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36 -foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50 -feet of right-of-way. 44. The public streets within the subdivision shall be located to align or offset a minimum of 12 5 -feet (centerline to centerline). 45. The turnarounds shall be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. 46. Provide a $30,000 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 9 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION • the cost of one-quarter of a traffic signal at the intersection of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. 47. Other than the proposed public streets, direct lot or parcel access to Ustick Road and Meridian Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 48. The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 49. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 50. Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. 51. The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Recommendations\PP018CedarSprings.wpd RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 10 PRELIMINARY PLAT - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION March 12, 2001 "111 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING March 15, 2001 APPLICANT J -U -B Engineers, Inc ITEM NO. 9 REQUEST Preliminary Plat approval for 268 building lots and 27 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision -- north of Ustick and west of Meridian Roads AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: SANITARY SERVICE: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: COMMENTS See previous Item Packet Contacted: Date: Q Phone: 31 IV I �7�0 Materia s presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. rJ-U-B,A March 8, 2001 Kevin Hughes W&H Pacific 3130 S. Owyhee Street Boise, ID 83705-4768 RE: n City of Meridian 56 -acre Park Site Irrigation Plan Review J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 208-376-7330 FAX: 208-323-9336 MAR 15 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Dear Mr. Hughes: C We are in receipt of the Gravity Irrigation Plans for the Meridian Park Tiling Project and have reviewed the plans on behalf of the owner, Kevin Howell Development. Although we wish to develop this property, the City has delayed the review and approval of the preliminary plat. In addition, the White Drain sewer extension is delayed for at least 18 months by the latest City schedule. As such, we have no guarantees of developer work on this property, if any, for at least 18 months. In the meantime, this property must be provided its fair share of Oirrigation water in the historic location while not adversely directing wastewater to the site. The following is a list of comments and concerns that must be addressed prior to our approval of the plans: D 1. To ensure fair proportioning of irrigation water, Box "B" must be designed with an additional weir. 2. The 12 -inch delivery pipe must be revised to 15 -inch (minimum) and deliver our share of irrigation water directly to the concrete delivery ditch. Some adjustments to the box height may be required. V 3. Unless an alternate delivery method is proposed, the concrete delivery ditch must remain in place until the Howell property is developed and a pressurized irrigation system is installed and operational on the Howell site. 4. The 15 -inch delivery pipe and 24 -inch waste pipe must cross connect with a gated box or valve downstream of the Box "B" to allow diversion of the delivery flows to the waste drain. The. 24 -inch waste drain must be extended five feet north of the property line. The open ditch drain to the north may be located on only 10 feet of the Howell property and will be constructed at no cost to Howell. The remainder of the ditch may be constructed within the existing ACHD right-of-way with a license agreement to the existing drain location approximately 345 feet north of the property line. The existing drain outlet is approximately four feet inside the right-of-way line. Please contact ACHD concerning the license agreement requirements. Please research all potential utility conflicts prior to design and construction. q- J • rJ.V-B, ;inee rs Surveyors Planners Kevin Hughes March 8, 2001 Page 2 6. The existing driveway between the north boundary and the existing drain outlet must be tiled with a 24 -inch pipe for 30 feet and the driveway replaced to the existing condition. 7. With the exception of the 10 feet along the common boundary at Meridian Road, no grading will be allowed on the Howell property. 8. As an irrigation ditch user, Howell and all successive owners of this property shall have unrestricted access to Box "A" and Box "B" to ensure fair proportioning of irrigation water. 9. J -U -B ENGINEERS does not assume any responsibility for the functional operation of the structures to be designed by W&H Pacific and constructed by the City of Meridian to deliver adequate irrigation water and dispose of irrigation wastewater. 10. Please submit revised plans incorporating these revisions for review. We understand time is of the essence and will review the plans and provide comments O within 48 hours of receipt. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Matthew B. Schultz, P.E. YProject Engineer MBS:Ihc cc: Kevin Howell, Howell Construction Tom Kuntz, Meridian Parks Elroy Huff, Meridian Parks Ross Oyen, ACHD Ken Aschenbrenner F:\projects\11644\admin\park gravity review.doc NO J rJ March 1, 2001 0 Tom Kuntz Meridian Parks Department 11 East Bower Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Irrigation Coordination City Park at Ustick/Meridian Dear Mr. Kuntz: 4► J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 208-376-7330 FAX: 208-323-9336 gECEl"ED MAR 15 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN This letter is to summarize several meetings and phone conversations regarding the acceptability of the Meridian Park gravity irrigation design. This area is not regulated by either NMID or Settlers Irrigation District for design approval. As such, the design must be acceptable to the ditch users on this line. O As a representative of one of those users, Kevin Howell, I have repeatedly stated that the irrigation water needs to be delivered to its historic location at the common boundary between the park and his property. Ideally, provisions should be made for the ease of connection to convey the wasted irrigation water to the White Drain along the Meridian Road alignment. F1You have proposed to grade an interim trench across a portion of our site, until our site develops. With development, we will connect to the pipe stub on your property and continue the drain. At first glance, this would seem to be the most affordable solution to all affected parties. However, J -U -B ENGINEERS has never implied our approval of this alternative and have repeatedly stated that we will require plans for review and discussion with our client prior to consenting to this alternative. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, In . Matthew B. Schultz, E. Project Engineer MBS:Ihc cc: Kevin Howell, Howell Construction Dave Caneer, W&H Pacific Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S., J -U -B F:\projects\11644\admin\park irrigation.doc is wt A Member of The R Gmup BFCi&r\74 MAR 15 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN 3130 South Owyhee Street Boise, Idaho 83105-4168 208.342.5400 Fax 208.342.5353 PROJECT MEETING MINUTES 1:30 pm, February 7, 2001 @ Meridian Parks & Rec. Offices 56 AC. MERIDIAN PARK IRRIGATION DITCH TILING (WHP Proiect No. 822212.00100000) Present: Tom Kuntz, Meridian Parks & Recreation Dept. Director . Elroy Huff, Meridian Parks & Recreation Dept. Superintendent Ken Aschenbrenner (Part-time) Dale Cooper (Part-time) Matt Schultz (Part-time) Kevin Hughes, W&H Pacific Designer David Caneer, W&H Pacific Civil Engineer (WHP) Purpose: Review Preliminary Tiling Plan Design DISCUSSION Proposed Diversion Box Location - WHP presented their preliminary design plan with the three - celled diversion box (42.49 miner's inches to the park, 38.75 miner's inches to the Cedar Springs Subdivision to the north and 65.75 miner's inches to the users to the west) located in the northeast corner of the park site and west of Cedar Springs' proposed commercial site. Ken stated that there could be a maximum delivery of 225 miner's inches to the east side of the park site due to waste from other properties to the east. Since the existing Cedar Springs delivery ditch due north of the proposed diversion box will be removed when the site is developed, the possible maximum excess waste water (225 — 42.49 — 38.75 — 65.75= 78.01 miner's inches) will have no place to waste to. Consequently, it was agreed to relocate the diversion box and future park pressure irrigation system pump station to the park site's northeast corner abutting Meridian Rd. To ensure that Dale did not receive an excessive amount of water, the diversion box requires a check to waste any excess delivery water from the east into a pipe or ditch placed along the west side of Meridian Rd. and diverted north into the Settler's Irrigation District's White Drain. Matt said his client would dig a temporary trench across the future Cedar Springs commercial site to divert his water right and any waste water northwest into their existing delivery ditch. When Cedar Springs is developed, they will install a combination irrigation waste water and storm water pipe along the west side of the ultimate Meridian Rd. right-of-way and discharge it into the White Drain. Matt will check with Nathan Draper, Settler's Irrigation District Manager, to confirm that this increased amount of irrigation waste water is acceptable to them. 2. Irrigation Tiling Ali n,nt — Kevin confirmed that the irrigation pipe could deliver each water user's respective water right by gravity, but due to the relatively flat grades, the pipe would be extending above the ground and therefore require a couple feet of fill over it for protection. Tom said the planned park entrance drive off Meridian Rd. could be moved south of the 2.5'W x 1.5'D delivery squash pipe coming from the east side of Meridian Rd. to avoid the berm that would result from the elevated irrigation pipe. The berm could be turfed around the perimeter of the park site and designed into the park landscaping with a meandering asphalt path running over it. The irrigation pipe is proposed to be ADS N-12, but Tom asked WHP to price ADS vs. PVC pipe with a seal to see how much more the tighter sealed pipe would cost. whpacific.com planners surveyors engineers landscape architects 0 i Diversion Box Design — Elroy requested the three -celled diversion box with expanded metal lid be set a couple feet west of the ultimate Meridian Rd. right-of-way to allow him room to plant an irrigation screen around it. The main/incoming cell would contain the waste water check to the north and three delivery pipes connecting into three weir boxes metering Cedar Springs' water right to the north and the park's and the downstream users water rights to the west. The pipes would be fitted with lockable screw gates. The park pressure irrigation pump station's clearwater screen could be bolted to the flanged end of the park's delivery pipe and set in the main/incoming cell. A 1 t/2" return pipe from the pump station would have to be stubbed through the diversion box and connected to the clearwater screen to spray debris off the screen. Elroy said the clearwater screen should be capable of handling 500 — 600 GPM. The users would have to adjust the waste water check and weir heights the first year of operation in order to work out the actual heights required to deliver and waste the proper amount of irrigation water. Tom said Cedar Springs' weir box with lockable screw gate should be located on their own property behind their fence line. Elroy requested an 8" Cl. 125 pressure line be run from the exisitng well & pump into the downstream side of the park's weir box. The well pump is equipped with a screen. 4. Final Plan Delivery Schedule — Kevin will fax Elroy a sketch of the proposed diversion box layout by noon, Friday, February 9`'', along with the proposed Clemons clearwater screen catalogue cut for his review and comment by the end of the day. Final plans will be delivered at the end of the day Monday so the City can perform their plan review Tuesday and Wednesday for submittal of comments to WHP for incorporation into Friday, February 16`h's bid set. THESE MINUTES REFLECT THE AUTHOR'S RECOLLECTION OF THE MEETING DISCUSSIONS. IF THE READER DISCOVERS AN OMMISSION OR ERROR, THEY SHOULD BRING IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE AUTHOR IMMEDIATELY FOR CORRECTION OR THE MINUTES WILL BE DEEMED ACCURATE AS PRESENTED. avid Caneer, P.E. Project Manager February 27, 2001 Cc: Tom Kuntz & Elroy Huff, Meridian Parks & Rec. Dept. Nathan Draper, Settler's Irrigation District Manager Matt Schultz, J -U -B I:\Project\822212\W ord\2-7MtgMins.doc 3130 South Owyhee Street MAR 15 2001 Boise, Idaho 83105-4168 WY OF NERMUN 208.342.5400 fax 208.342.5353 A Member of The?Group PROJECT MEETING MINUTES 2.00 pm January 16 2001 @ Meridian City Hall Council Chambers 56 AC. MERIDIAN PARK IRRIGATION DITCH TILING (WHP Proiect No 822212 00100000) Present: (See attached Attendance List) Purpose: Project Kick -Off Meeting DISCUSSION 1. Introductions — The attendees introduced themselves which included City Parks & Rec. and DPW staff, ACHD representatives, J -U -B Project Engineer for the Cedar Springs Subdivision proposed north of the park, the City's irrigation ditch tiling consulting engineers, W&H Pacific (WHP), Ken Aschenbrenner, the park site farmer, and downstream surface water users Martin Yurke, Dale Cooper, Dick Richards, Ranny Endicott, Warren Watson & Lester Vogel. 2. Review Site Topography & Park Master Plan — WHP presented the site topographic map overlaid with the City's three -phased Park Master Plan. The ground falls about 7' over the ± 2,000' length of the park site (east to west) with about 8' of fall in the existing concrete irrigation ditch with delivery water running through the middle of the site. J -U -B presented the Cedar Springs Preliminary Plat with the existing irrigation delivery and waste ditches shown running through the park site (formerly Lopez Property) and the Cedar Springs/Kevin Howell site to the north (Creason Property) and future elementary school site to the west (Vastrey Property). The water running to the west is delivery water that serves the Cooper Property and former Scholten Property. The water running to the north in the concrete irrigation ditch along Meridian Rd. is delivery water that serves the Creason Property and the water running north in the dirt ditch along the park's west property line is waste water that runs north and northwest through the Creason Property into Settler's Irrigation District's White Drain. Based on a prior Parks & Rec. mtg. with Ken on December 11, 2000, he confirmed that the existing 15" pipe running under Meridian Rd. about 285 feet north of Ustick Road carries irrigation waste water behind the house on the northwest corner of Meridian & Ustick Roads and dumps it into the existing dirt combination storm water & irrigation waste ditch running along the north side of Ustick to the west. An existing 24" corrugated metal pipe near the southwest corner of the site also discharges irrigation waste water into the ditch on the north side of Ustick from the existing dirt combination storm water & irrigation waste ditch running along the south side of Ustick and properties to the south. Tom was not aware of any easements encumbering the park site. Disposition of 522 GPM Irrigation Pump — The existing artesian well and pump, which Ken said has a flow rate of 522 GPM, are located about 10' west of the existing 50' wide Meridian Rd. right-of- way (25' from centerline/section line). (Ken owns the pump.) When the Meridian Rd. right-of-way is widened to its ultimate width of 96' (48' from centerline/section line), the well and pump will have to be relocated outside the new right-of-way. Ross suggested that Tom contact their Planning & Development Services Division and ACHD Right -of -Way Division to confirm who would pay to relocate the well when Meridian Rd. is widened. The City's well and pump ground water source and its surface water right are to be combined to serve the park's future irrigation pump station and sprinkler system. The consensus was that the best spot for their relocation is in the northeast corner whpacific.com planners surveyors engineers landscape architects 0 9 of the park site abutting Meridian Rd., for easy access, and Cedar Springs, where J -U -B shows their irrigation pump station. 4. Agency Jurisdiction — The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District and Settler's Irrigation District (SID) have confirmed that the park site is outside their jurisdiction and that the ditches running through it are "user's ditches". However, SID has requirements for discharging into their system - - in this case, the White Drain running east to west along the north side of Cedar Springs. (Per my subsequent call to the SID Manager, Nathan Draper, who was unable to attend this meeting, any proposed new irrigation waste water or storm drainage discharge points or changes in the proposed discharge flows into the White Drain will have to be approved by SID.) 5. Tiling Pipe Sizes & Alignment Options — Ken provided WHP with a breakdown of the water user's water rights which come into the concrete irrigation ditch running through the center of the park site from a 2.5' wide x 1.5' deep squash pipe that runs under Meridian Rd. and discharges into the ditch at the park site's east property line as follows: Creason Property 38.75 miner's inches Vastrey Property 24.75 miner's inches Scholten Property 19.75 miner's inches Cooper Property 21.25 miner's inches Lopez/Park Property 42.49 miner's inches The irrigation delivery pipe/tiling will have to be sized to deliver each property its respective water right. Matt said the delivery water allocated to the Cedar Springs/Kevin Howell site (Creason & Vastrey Properties) will have to be maintained until the site is developed. Its development is pending a sanitary sewer extension from the west, which may not happen this year, in which case the property is likely to be farmed. Mr. Cooper is on the tail end of the delivery ditch and requires delivery of his full water right. Three tiling alignment options were discussed including 1) Tiling Center Ditch, 2) Tile Ditch @ E., N. & W. Property Lines and 3) Tile South Ditch. The three options involve tiling ±2,5001.f. (through the center of the site with waste water from the east and south diverted along the east and south property lines) to 5,500 l.f. (along the east, north & west and/or south property lines) of new and/or rerouted existing irrigation ditch within the park site. It was agreed that the preferred option was to construct an irrigation diversion box in the northeast corner of the park site to deliver water to 1) Mr. Cooper and the other downstream water users to the west, 2) Mr. Howell to maintain his agricultural lands until he develops Cedar Springs and waste the extra water to the White Drain, and 3) the City for use in their park's future pressurized irrigation system. Duane said that ACHD is planning to chip seal a 28' wide swath along Ustick Rd. this spring which will require them to tile the existing dirt combination storm water & irrigation ditch running along the south side of Ustick Rd. The road storm drain runoff would be collected in a new borrow ditch drained to flow with the grades to the west. Ross said that ACHD does not have any Ustick Rd. or Meridian Rd. storm drainage improvements in their 5 -year capital improvement program. Since the existing 15" waste water pipe, that runs under Meridian Rd. and carries irrigation waste water behind the house on the northwest corner of Meridian & Ustick Roads to the ditch running along the north side of Ustick, cannot be redirected north due to its invert being 2.4' (elevations 86.1-88.5) lower than the concrete V -ditch to the north, Tom suggested that ACHD consider tiling the existing dirt combination storm water & irrigation waste ditch running along the north side of Ustick Rd. instead since the 15" waste water pipe will have to be kept alive until the property at the northeast corner of Meridian & Ustick Roads is developed. ACHD prefers that irrigation pipes be located outside of their right-of-way since the pipes are not theirs and therefore they do not maintain them. However, it may be possible for ACHD to grant an irrigation pipe easement within their right-of-way if the pipe were placed under their sidewalk or within the landscape strip in front or behind the future Ustick Rd. sidewalk. An ACHD License Agreement may also be required. Duane did not see a problem with tiling either ditch except for deciding the pipe's location with respect to the ultimate Ustick Rd. right -of way. Since this portion of the park will not be developed until the second phase, Tom wanted to explore this option after confirming the timing of the property developing at the northeast corner of Meridian & Ustick Roads. 6. Tiling Design Criteria — With the downstream irrigation water user's concerns about a tiled ditch getting plugged with debris and them possibly having to clean the pipe out, it was agreed that the upstream/opened ends of all irrigation pipe be fitted with a trash rack to reduce the chances of downstream plugging. It was also agreed that junction boxes be installed in the tiled ditches at all angle points and at adequate intervals to allow the pipes to be flushed or rodded with available equipment. Gary said he prefers that the irrigation pipe running within the park site be designed for gravity flow and that siphons be avoided wherever possible. Weirs and gates will need to be installed in the diversion box proposed at the park's northeast corner to regulate/divert the respective water rights to each property owner. 7. Waste Water Tiling Coordination with Cedar Springs Subdivision — It was agreed that the park's waste water discharge could be combined into Cedar Springs' proposed combination waste water and storm drain line to be installed along the west side of Meridian Rd. and discharged into the White Drain to the north. 8. Irrigation Pipe Maintenance Responsibilities — This was a major issue for the downstream water users since they do not have adequate equipment to rod or flush out plugged irrigation pipes. When ditches get plugged it's easier to clear them than it is an underground pipe. Resolution of the irrigation pipe maintenance issue was deferred to a later date. 9. ACHD Ultimate 96' Wide Right -of -Way Requirements — ACHD confirmed the ultimate Meridian & Ustick Road right-of-way widths at 96' (48' from centerline/section line). The proposed irrigation tiling along Meridian Rd. should be located outside this ulimate right-of-way (i.e. — within the park property). Ross said that ACHD would likely require the City to construct deceleration/acceleration lanes into their park entries/driveways and sidewalk, but no curb & gutter, along their park's Ustick & Meridian Rd. frontages when they submitted their park improvement plans. He suggested that Tom contact Christy Richardson in their Planning & Development Services Division to confirm the timing of the right-of-way dedication and what off-site roadway improvements would likely be imposed on the City as a result of their proposed park project. 10. ACHD Borrow Ditch/Road Drainage Requirements & Maintenance — ACHD agreed that it is their responsibility to handle borrow ditch storm water. If existing combination storm water & irrigation waste ditches are tiled within ACHD's right-of-way, Duane said that ACHD would maintain them. 0 0 However, as mentioned above, ACHD is not responsible for maintaining irrigation pipes lying outside of their right-of-way. 11. Project Schedule/Construction Inspection - The City wishes to complete the construction of this project prior to water returning to the irrigation system for the spring irrigation season, so that construction of Phase 1 of the park (northeast portion of the site) can begin immediately thereafter. The City will be responsible for inspection of the gravity irrigation/ditch tiling improvements. THESE MINUTES REFLECT THE AUTHOR'S RECOLLECTION OF THE MEETING DISCUSSIONS. IF THE READER DISCOVERS AN OMMISSION OR ERROR, THEY SHOULD BRING IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE AUTHOR IMMEDIATELY FOR CORRECTION OR THE MINUTES WILL BE DEEMED ACCURATE AS PRESENTED. David Caneer, P.E. Project Manager February 27, 2001 Cc: Tom Kuntz & Elroy Huff, Meridian Parks and Rec. Dept. Matt Schultz, J -U -B Nathan Draper, Settler's Irrigation District Manager Ross Oyen & Duane Hays, ACHD Attachment Meridian Parks & Recreation RECEIVED MAR 14 2001 Memo City of Meridian City Clerk Office To: Planning and Zoning Commission, Mayor Corrie, City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission From: Tom Kuntz K Date: 03-14-01 Re: Negotiation of single loaded street in Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction At the February 15 Planning and Zoning meeting, the Commission recommended the City Parks Department meet with the developer of Cedar Springs Subdivision to resolve the single loaded street issue. On February 22, the Parks staff met with representatives from JUB and the developer to discuss possible solutions to the street issue. At the conclusion of the meeting, two options were left on the table without a viable compromise. The Paries Staff recommends the developer combine eight to ten existing lots into one common lot along the northwest park boundary (see attachment A). This common lot would help the developer meet the 5% open space requirement, and address the Parks Department's concerns about visibility and safety in the park. The developer did not support this recommendation due to traffic concerns. The Parks staff believes the developers concerns about increased traffic could be mitigated by prohibiting on street parking on the south side of Alexis Drive. In exchange for a single loaded street, the developer offered to construct a road from the North Venable Lane into the northwest comer of the park. The Park staff does not support this option for three reasons; (1) the building lots on Alexis Drive would be bordered on two sides by a street or parking lot (attachment b). This is prohibited by City Ordinance #12-4-5 (which states all blocks shall be two-tier, i.e. no double frontages). (2) This would invite more traffic than the single loaded street. (3) It would not meet the original purpose of a single loaded street which was to provide law enforcement the opportunity to perform "drive by views" from an adjacent public street into the northwest comer of the park. 0 Page 1 The developer declined the opportunity to meet with the Parks staff a second time to resolve this issue. Without an acceptable compromise to the single loaded street issue, the Parks and Recreation staff recommends denial of the Cedar Springs subdivision application for annexation and preliminary plat. • Page 2 EN �i '=4 V433NICta 911-C NOLUMsrmTOWN wAMI NOImmenS -v11Nwmu SE)NIdds MVU30 and mjyNIWn3Hd tip f�fez f'uqu '1l�t l!! NT lit e— • Y b h R �171- BBQ - lil-r i NOU.�fA1181100 TS�MOII MI.�1 �1p1� s NOIS AICanS - M1NMISMd SONIUdS WY030 4yf.�ws�awws i "Id.tHVNmmWd IIJ /,r �I -- --- -------- h — ---- h a: .Q� 104CLuw I MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless MEMORANDUM: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner IZA PImn19-1 zjo�t(9 ROL-N,.� 15 , 2CO 1 J l+cm No. q (208) 884-5533 • FAX 888-6854 March 14, 2001 Re: CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT REVISION - Request for Preliminary Plat of 99.83 Acres for 295 Lots by Kevin Howell Construction for a Residential Subdivision in a Proposed R-4 Zone (File #PP -00- 018) This Staff memo responds to the 3-12-01 letter from Matthew Schultz of J -U -B Engineers and the accompanying revised preliminary plat. At your 2-15-01 meeting, the P&Z Commission instructed Mr. Kevin Howell and Mr. Tom Kuntz to meet to discuss options regarding the "single loaded street" and how the minimum 5% open space requirement will be met. As stated in Mr. Schultz's letter (Item #3), the number of residential building lots was reduced and the amount of usable open space was increased to 5.2% of the subdivision. However, the open space was not provided along the city park; the open space was integrated into existing and one (1) new stormwater detention lot, dispersed throughout the subdivision. No compromise was reached between Mr. Howell and Mr. Kuntz regarding the provision of a "single loaded street" along the north end of the 56 -acre city park. (See Mr. Kuntz's letter to the Commission.) This issue will need to be reviewed by Commission and a final decision incorporated into your motion on this application. There are still to (2) outstanding issues that were raised in the 2-15-01 Staff report which we request be addressed by the Applicant and Commission at the 3-15-01 hearing: Item #5, pg. 6 — To date, the City has not received a written response from Settlers Irrigation District on the easement width and tiling of the White Drain along the north boundary and the revised plat still does not show easement boundaries. Mr. Schultz's letter states that this issue will be addressed by the Settlers Irrigation Board, but no date is provided. Staff's primary concern is the easement width on this facility, as that may place some of the lots under the minimum lot size. If the Applicant can confirm the 25 -foot width shown will not change, our concern is addressed. Ordinance 12-4-13.A.2. allows the Applicant to request a waiver of the canal tiling, so a formal Variance application is not required. 2. Item #9, pg. 6 — The revised plat still shows an easementJmicropath at the NW corner of the city park. The Applicant should address how this strip will be utilized and ensure measures are in place that will restrict pedestrian access into this corner of the park, unless otherwise approved by the Meridian Parks & Recreation Department. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar SpringsIv.pp ir&U-B,i7_� March 12, 2001 Brad Hawkins -Clark City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 100 Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Dear Mr. Hawkins -Clark: Cedar Springs Preliminary Plat J -IJ -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS Regional Office 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208-376-7330 Fax: 208-323-9336 Please find the attached revised Preliminary Plat for Cedar Springs Subdivision. Since the last meeting, the following issues have been resolved: 1. The ACHD requirement for an additional collector street was a misprint. ACHD staff has issued a revised report. 2. J -U -B ENGINEERS has requested a waiver for the requirement to tile the White Drain. Depending on the results of the next Settlers Irrigation Board meeting, we will submit a variance application to be heard at City Council. 3. We have reviewed the site drainage and landscaping requirements. Based on our analysis, the detention basins were upsized. The resultant lot count is 264 and 5.2% of the area has been designated as usable open space in accordance with Meridian criteria. 4. As discussed in depth at the last meeting, the developer does not wish to encourage parking for the City Park interior to the Cedar Springs Subdivision. A "single -loaded" street on the south property line is not proposed with the revised preliminary plat. On behalf of our client and in accordance with staff recommendations, J -U -B ENGINEERS requests approval of the subdivision as submitted. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. y4dz/ Matthew B. Schultz, P.E. Project Engineer MBS: the Attachment cc: Kevin Howell, Kevin Howell Construction Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S., J -U -B Daren Fluke, A.I.C.P., J -U -B F:\projects\11644\admin\new plat commission.doc February 15, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 400 Meridian, ID 83642 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 RE: Response to Staff Report dated February 15, 2001 Cedar Springs Subdivision Members of the Commission: 208-376-7330 FAX: 208-323-9336 BE C F, IVE]) F F B 15 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN We are in receipt of the staff report for Cedar Springs Subdivision and offer the following responses to the issues raised therein. For ease of use we have addressed any issues in the order they appear in the staff report. Requirement #2, pg. 3, requiring 5% open space within the development. As requested we have analyzed our open space relative to the newly adopted landscaping ordinance. Of the total amount of open space provided, 3.14 acres or 3.14% of the total land area complies with the provisions of the ordinance. We will fully comply with the provisions of the ordinance for the design and maintenance of the open space but must reiterate the comments of staff noting that our application was submitted well before the adoption of the landscape ordinance. To fully comply with the 5% requirement would require eliminating approximately ten lots. Had the ordinance been adopted at the time of design we would have of course complied. However, we have already eliminated 65 lots for the addition of a school site and do not feel that the loss of an additional ten lots is warranted, especially given the proximity of a regional park on our southern boundary. Requirement #3, pg. 3, requiring a buffer between lot 34 and future L-0 site to the east. The proposed L-0 site is currently requested to be zoned R-4. The site will require both a rezone and a conditional use to be developed and any buffering would be properly addressed at that time. Requirement #5, pg. 4, requiring a planter strip on Meridian Road. The Ada County Highway District has required that the sidewalk on Meridian Road be placed two feet within the new right-of-way. We are amendable to placing landscaping within the right-of-way provided that the District will grant a license agreement to do so. Requirement #3, pg. 5, pertaining to irrigation service. The irrigation pump facility is proposed to be located within the common landscape area along Meridian Road and the alignment of the irrigation supply ditch for the area. The final plans will detail the exact location. Requirement #4, pg. 5, pertaining to ownership and maintenance of the pressurized irrigation system. We intend to have the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District own and maintain the pressurized irrigation system. The application to accomplish this is currently being completed. LJ l rJ - u • B� City ry Meridian _� February 15, 2001 Page 2 Engineers Surveyors Planners Requirement #5, pg. 5, pertaining to the irrigation easement on the north boundary. The Settler's Irrigation District easement on the north property line will be maintained. We have provided a 25' common lot to accommodate the easement in accordance with the District's policies. A 6' solid cedar fence will be provided on the north boundary of the lots abutting the 25' common Lot. Requirement #6, pg. 6, pertaining to Venable Lane. The District is requiring a 40' street section to the north of the school, the remainder of the road is required to be a 36' street section. See attached email from Christy Richardson to Gary Lee, dated February 13, 2001. Requirement #7, pg. 6, pertaining to Ashton Lane. Our traffic study documented a need for a residential collector to Ashby Drive, not Greenwich Way. We are working with the Highway District to clarify what appears to be a clerical error. Requirement #8, pg. 6, pertaining to relocation of the park micro -path. We coordinated the location of the path with both the Meridian School District and the Meridian Parks Department. We can certainly move the path but believe that the proposed location works well for both the park and the school. Requirement #9, pg. 6, additional micro -path. The requested path makes good sense and are amenable to a condition requiring such. Requirement #10, pg. 6, pertaining to a pedestrian crossing on Ustick Road. We certainly agree with the staff that development of an elementary school and a regional park could necessitate construction of a controlled pedestrian crossing and/or a signal. However, our traffic study clearly showed that our development does not warrant construction of a signal at this Location. We are required to contribute $30,000 above and beyond the required impact fees for construction of a signal at the Ustick/Meridian Road intersection. We suggest that the Commission evaluate the need for a signal upon a development request for the park and/or the school and condition those applications accordingly. Requirement #11, pg. 6, pertaining to a single loaded road adjoining the park. See below. OTHER ISSUES Availability of sewer We are of course aware of the lack of sewer at the present time. As the Commission is no doubt aware, the delay is attributable to a downstream property owner who has been unwilling/unable to grant easements for the future White Trunk Line until development plans for the property were finalized. The plans have been finalized and submitted to the City for approval in the form of an annexation, conditional use, and preliminary plat application. At a workshop before the City Council U:\Dst\CedarSprings\2-15 response. DOC City of Meridian fJ - U-B,A February 15, 2001 Page 3 Engineers Surveyors Planners on February 13, 2001, said land owner's representative stated on the record that the land owner has no problem with granting the easements and that the alignments have been delivered to the Public Works Department and the city's design consultant on disk and that the City had not asked for the easement up to that time. We further understand that the City Council has placed a priority on the design and construction of the required trunk line. For these reasons we have a high degree of confidence that the line will be built within the near term and view any current complications as simply a matter of timing. We fully understand that we cannot record a final plat without the trunk but would like to proceed with the final design and construction of the subdivision so that we can simply hook in upon the arrival of the trunk line at our property line. We have designed the trunk Line through our development in accordance with the sewer master plan and have submitted preliminary plan and profiles for our segment of the line to the City and the City's design consultant to incorporate into the design of the White Trunk Line. We are comfortable with a condition of approval requiring physical hookup to the line prior to the City's signature of the final plat and ask the Commission to send the application to the City Council with a recommendation of approval contingent upon such a condition. Treatment of the park boundary We are in receipt of the unsigned memo from the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff to the Planning and Zoning Commission, Mayor Corrie and the City Council dated 2-14-01 wherein the Commission is requested to require a complete redesign of our preliminary plat to provide a single Loaded road along the north boundary of the park site (our southern boundary). We received the memo by fax only this morning (2-15-01). We will deal with the merits of the request but feel that we must point out our extreme disappointment with how this whole matter has been handled. in particular, the closing line of the third paragraph ('The developer chose to ignore the request due to potential loss of building lots.") is simply untrue and is counterproductive to a mutually acceptable solution. In the 2-14 memo, it is stated that the concept of a single loaded road was discussed at two predevelopment meetings in July and November. In point of fact, we discussed our layout relative to the park at least three times with Tom Kuntz prior to design of the plat and submittal of the application. We are able to document two of those discussions (see attached) and at no time was the topic of a single loaded road mentioned. In fact, Mr. Kuntz commented on the location of our proposed pathway connections saying that they seemed to work fine with the master plan that was currently under development. Prior to our submittal of the preliminary plat in September, our pedestrian access and utility stub locations were submitted and revised pursuant to the direction of Mr. Kuntz. Since the original submittal in August, our item has been continued primarily due to the White Trunk Line delay. At the same time, we were worked closely with the Joint School District No. 2 to delete approximately 65 building lots and add an elementary school to the site plan. The single -loaded street concept was first mentioned by Mr. Kuntz in a rather off -hand manner in a meeting to discuss issues with the school site in late November. At that time we indicated that we were opposed to the idea because of the size of the park and the attendant impacts on our development and the difficulty of redesigning the plat to accommodate such a request. Since that time we have seen nothing until today in the form of a formal request. Now that we have said U:\Dsi\Cedar Springs\2-15 response.DOC Ifok City of Meridian f'J - U - B , February 15, 2001 Page 4 Eng neers Surveyors Planners request we can respond in a reasonable manner, and we still believe that this is a bad idea for all involved. Because of the lack of notice on this issue we do not have time to respond in writing to bullet points noted as favoring the single loaded road concept in the memo. We will address each point in turn at the public hearing but our opposition can be summed up in two clear points, to wit: A single loaded road will invite additional vehicle traffic into the development and will increase impacts on surrounding properties. One glance at the master plan shows that the closest location to the baseball diamonds and soccer fields clearly shows that the closest parking spot to those facilities would be a road on the north boundary. Untold cars will be enticed into the development to look for parking as near to the field as possible. If you think you will have complaints from neighbors, just wait until you turn their street into a de facto parking lot. A single loaded road is a fine concept and works extremely well to accomplish the goals Listed in the memo for a neighborhood park up to about ten acres in size. However, this is a regional park, almost sixty acres in size, meant to serve a good portion of the city. The impacts of a park this size reach far beyond those of a neighborhood park and invite much more in the way of adverse impacts on surrounding properties. We are not opposed to working with the Parks Department and have done so to facilitate the location of utilities and irrigation facilities. However, this concept makes no sense at this location and we ask that you approve the plat a presented. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Daren S. Fluke, AICP Planning Associate DSF: the U:\Dst\Cedar Springs\2-I5 respunse.DOC El • Daren Fluke . From: Gary Lee Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 7:38 AM To: Daren Fluke; Matt Schultz Subject: Cedar Springs Conditions of Approval - ACHD response Daren & Matt, Please forward this e-mail and clarification to the City Staff G. -----Original Message ----- From: Christy Richardson[mai Ito: Crichardson(a)_achd.ada.id.usl Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:13 AM To: GAL(a-)JUB.com Subject: Re: Cedar Springs Conditions of Approval I will fix the report to clarify, but your assumptions are correct: up to the school Venable Lane should be a 40 -foot street section. To the north of the non-residential uses it can be a 36 -foot section. Gary Lee <GAL(c_JUB.com> 02/12/01 03:27PM >>> Christy: I would like to get a clarification on Site Specific Condition 7 and 15. No. 7 asks for'/ of a 36 foot street + 12' of pavement for Venable Lane. Condition 15 asks for 1/2 of 40 foot street + 12' of pavement. I have assumed that Condition 15 applies to that portion of Venable Lane from Ustick to the north property line of the school site & Condition 7 applies for everything north of that. Am I correct? Gary A. Lee, P.E.,L.S. J -U -B Engineers, Inc. 208-376-7330 Gary Lee From: Gary Lee ent: Tuesda , April 18, 2000 2:58 PM o: 'dfluke o@langstonwilliams.com' Subject: Meridian - Howell site Contacts: Darren Fluke, AICP Daren: Just spoke to Tom Kuntz, Meridian Parks Dept. The City has hired a firm in Seattle to prepare a park master plan that will consiste of: 4 little league diamonds, 4 soccer fields, open park area and a meandering pathway around the entire perimeter of the site. The plan will be available in about 30 days. He will call us when he has it available. The pedestrian pathway will be set back about 25 to 50 feet from the property lines of the park. The property line will be fenced. Two vehicular entrances and parking lots will be off of Ustick and Meridian Road. No entrances required or desired along our common boundary. He said that he would welcome ped. pathway connections along the north and west boundary of the park site. However, no stub streets or vehicle access. Ped. access are welcome, maybe 3 or 4 points would be good - but no more than 6. Any questions, please call me. Thanks, Gary Lee JUB Engineers. • C 0 Phone Loi Job #11644 Date: July 13, 2000 ti With: Tom Kuntz, Director - Meridian Parks and Recreation Department 888-3579 RE: Howell Meridian Site — City Park Coordination Overview: I sent a fax of a preliminary layout for the Howell Meridian site indicating general lot layout with future park access points labeled. He contacted me saying the west and north access points seemed to coordinate very well with his master plan (which I haven't seen yet). He expressed some concern with the proximity of the northeast access point to the proposed ball diamond. In addition, he would like the height of the fences along the access ways to be less than 6 feet. I agreed with him that a "tunnel" effect is created, however maybe making the pathway a little wider would alleviate the concern. He seemed to seem o.k. with everything in general. Followup: I called him back and asked for a digital version of the master plan and gave him my e- mail address so we could incorporate the park plan into our submittal. as • V ROBERT D. CORRIE *CITY OF MERI N Mayor PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TOM KUNTZ 11 W. Bower St. • Meridian. ID 83642 Parks & Recreation Director Phone (208) 888-3579 • Fax (208) 898-5501 MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission, Mayor Corrie and City Council From: Parks and Recreation Commission and Staff Date: 02-14-01 CC.: Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, and Bill Nichols COUNCIL MEMBERS RON ANDERSON KEITH BIRD TAMMY DeWEERD CHERIE MCCANDLESS FXCErVED F F B 15 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Re: Requiring a single loaded street on the southern boundary of Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction The Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission and Parks Staff would like to submit the following comments into the record for Planning and Zoning Commissions consideration in regards to the Cedar Springs Subdivision request for annexation, zoning and preliminary plat. We want to address the single loaded street issue as it relates to Cedar Springs Subdivision and our new 58 -acre park which are contiguous to each other. We have discussed and researched this issue, since it pertains to this park and our new park development standards. Staff and Commission consider it essential that a single loaded street (no yards backing up to the park) be required on the southern boundary of the Cedar Springs subdivision. A single loaded street is vital for a variety of reasons. as listed below. This issue affects the community's use of this park and the development of future parks of this size. The concept of the single loaded street was addressed with the developer and their representative at two pre -development meetings (July 18 and November 16;2000). The developer chose to ignore the request due to potential loss of building lots. Single loaded streets along the park boundary provide the following benefits: • Park appears more inviting to the public due to unobstructed access. Create a buffer zone between the park and future homeowners. • Helps to eliminate potential complaints or conflicts from homeowners related to: a. Privacy b. Trespassing c. Vandalism d. Light encroachment from sports fields e. Noise pollution f. Damage to homes due to park use g. Injury to home owners from baseballs and soccer balls • Handicapped parking spaces can be provided next to the park athletic field area. • Eliminates fencing and privacy landscaping costs for the developer or homeowner. • Eliminates costs to the developer of pedestrian access pathways between homes. • Eliminates hidden areas created by solid fences. • Provides higher visibility for police (see attached memo dated 2-14-01 from Chief William Gordon). • Provides better access for emergency vehicles to the northern portion of the park, which is predominantly athletic fields (see attached memo dated 2-15-01 from Meridian Fire Department). The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is willing to pay for the costs of curb, gutter and sidewalk and, as per ACHD's requirements, 4 feet of the street adjacent to our property. If a wider street were required to allow for parallel parking, we would consider sharing those additional costs. To minimize the possibility of park patrons parking in front of homeowner's property, we are also willing to re -design our park plan to include a parking lot in the north-east corner of the 58 acre site. We are currently trying to select a site for a new skate park, visibility and safety are key issues to City Council and Mayor in selecting and planning park sites as is also evident in the attached memos from the Meridian Police and Fire Departments. This is the first park of this size to ever be developed in Meridian. The single loaded street is a vital component of this park. Please help us plan Meridian's future by requiring a single loaded street in the Cedar Springs Subdivision. ME R, DIAN POLICE tEPARTMEAT W. L. "BILL" GORDON Chief of Police f TO: Mayor Robert Corrie 2/14/01 FROM: Chief William Gordon d� REFERENCE: Parks and Public Safety After reading a memo from Tom Kuntz and Elroy Huff, I revisited the PHONE: (208) 888-6678 FAX: (208) 884-5077 preliminary plans for a proposed subdivision north of Ustick Rd. at Meridian Rd. that borders our newest park. All city parks should provide for access by emergency vehicles and personal to as much of the park as possible. Parks generate problems mainly because they do what they are designed to do (attract people). Any place that attracts people also needs extra services (police, fire and ambulance). The need for emergency services is a 24 hour a day need that must be considered at the beginning of any park design. All parks should have roads capable of handling a variety of emergency vehicles to prevent crimes, provide emergency services, and promote use by kids and families. Parks do require extra services and the layout of all parks or recreation areas should not cause safety problems by restricting visibility and easy access by all. Parks need to have roads surrounding them and when they reach a certain size, they should have roads through them. The current plan also needs to address the school site on the west end, it to posses some of the same concerns. If you should have any questions please feel free to contact me at your convenience. 201 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 I 7r% Meridian Fire Department Memo To: Mayor Come, City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission From: Chief Ken W. Bowers, Meridian Fire Department Date: 02-15-01 X�3' Re: Cedar Springs Subdivision In the interest of providing emergency services to the 58 -acre park site next to Cedar Springs Subdivision, we would like to request that consideration be given to providing a street between public and private property. This would ensure access to all portions of the park, without having to transverse large portions of unoccupied surfaces. Our experience in providing emergency services in similar situations require that ambulance gurneys be wheeled over 600 feet unimproved surface. The result is that the patient care can be delayed when we have to access patients in remote portions of the park. We would be glad to work with the design team to improve emergency access to the park. 0 Page 1 February 9, 2001 "111 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING February 15, 2001 APPLICANT Kevin Howeil Development ITEM NO. 5 REQUEST Preliminary Plat approval for 268 building lots and 27 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision - north of Ustick and west of Meridian Roads AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See previous Item Packet CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: SANITARY SERVICE: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See attached draft report CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See attached comments 1 NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See attached comments fU�� IDAHO POWER: j� V US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: �, l Contacted: �IvC �'�'JIU 6 -y -Date: 2 I �� ( Phone: '-T-3-3 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. CH D Ada County Highway Hi hwa District Judy Peavey -Derr, President Dave Bivens, 1st Vice President 318 East 37th Street Sherry R. Huber, 2nd Vice President Garden City ID 83714-6499 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner Phone (208) 387-6100 David E. Wynkoop, Commissioner FAX (208) 387-6391 E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us February 8, 2001 TO: Kevin Howell Development 1087 W River St. #250 Boise, ID 83702 FROM: Christy Richardson, Principal Development Analyst Planning & Development e _ SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Cedar Springs RECEIVED FEB 12 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Meridian Road & Ustick On February 7, 2001, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho registered professional Engineer. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. C. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute a Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of the construction of all required street improvements. 3. Furnish a copy of the Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority to ether with the payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs. 4. If Public Right -of -Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make the deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings together with the plat and plan review fees for District acceptance and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner and the Land Surveyor's certification. 7. All of the material must be submitted to District staff two -weeks prior to Commission review of the final plat. 8. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. The Commission will consider an extension of one year if requested within 15 -days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at (208) 387-6170, should you have any questions. Cc: Planning & Development Chron/File Planning & Development Services -City of Meridian Construction Services — John Edney Drainage- Chuck Rinaldi Mathew Schiltz J -U -B Engineers 250 S Beechwood Ave. Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709 i • ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat — Cedar Springs n/w/c Meridian Road/Ustick Road Modification MAZ-00-019/MPP-00-018 REVISED The application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Cedar Springs is a 268 -lot residential subdivision on 99.8 -acres. The site also includes one office lot and one elementary school site, and one possible multi -family or office/commercial site. The applicant is also requesting annexation into the City of Meridian and a rezone from RUT to R-4. The site is located generally north of Ustick Road on the west side of Meridian Road. This development is estimated to generate 4,168 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. On October 25, 2000, the ACHD Commission reviewed and approved Cedar Springs Subdivision, a 333 -lot residential subdivision. The applicant has modified the site plan. The new plan has fewer residential lots, the addition of office/commercial lots, and a school site. Changes to this report have been made in bold. Roads impacted by this development: Meridian Road Ustick Road ACHD Commission Date — February 7, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. � � ! 7UNDN_NLA3N NOIST081S Tv11.N301S3d SJNIUdS WC30 P9g�9 VW3 1Vd U"W1113kd"+4?-=T � + 4 jF j ! p jtt 2i?a 11iff j �Et lid�l�g �' ;y�l j!!> #� �` • '1 j!s y1ill ijiiif 7 Y j lit I�°! ------- — -----u�s�—�¢3saot�------�--- -- ------ ---Aw------- • oT d b i I ` i � �) ) •'))•) �• ��' 1 Ise 171 Ju ILW 9 ZX e—r•--------- va 0 71 A --EZZ-------- • 11 03 ' i ( -- ! I I ' 1----)L_ -- _-- - W. USTICK ROAD W.ASHBYSTREET o � (FUTURE CITY PARK) CEDAR SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FIGURE 1 Q O ff z Q w z ftwroya p r U•B � ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS• PLANNERS Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — Leslie Family Trust/Moore Family Trust Applicant — J.U.B. RUT - Existing zoning R-4 - Requested zoning 99.8 - Acres 1i - Proposed residential building lots - Proposed office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) - Proposed office/multi-family lot/commercial (Ustick Road) - Proposed elementary school lot 2,566 — vehicle trips per day for single family lots 474 — vehicle trips per day for office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) 418 — vehicle trips per day for office/multi-family lot (Ustick Road) 710 — vehicle trips per day for elementary school site 4,168 — total vehicle trips per day North Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District 255 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Meridian Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 4,156 on 8-2-00 Better than C -Existing Level of Service Better than C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 1,530 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Meridian Road is improved with two traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Ustick Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 3,960 on 8-2-00 Better than C — Existing Level of Service Better than C — Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 460 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Cedar Sprijigs. rev.cmm Pa -e 2 Ustick Road is improved with two traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. B. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. C. The applicant submitted a revised traffic study for this development. The results of the traffic study, and the key findings include: • The proposed project is a 268 -lot single family subdivision located near the Ustick Road and Meridian Road intersection. The revised plan also has one office/commercial lot off Meridian Road, one office or multi -family lot (approximately 63 units) off Ustick Road, and an elementary school site. • The estimated build -out year for the subdivision is 2005. • The trip generation is 4,168 vehicle trips per day, or 420 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. • The subdivision proposes one approach to Ustick Road, located west of Meridian Road, and two approaches on Meridian Road, both located north of Ustick Road. • All three proposed approaches have two outbound lanes: a left -turn lane and a right -turn lane. The left -turn movements will operate at LOS A for the three approaches. • The construction of left -turn bays on Ustick Road and Meridian Road for the three proposed subdivision approaches. • There are four stub streets proposed, three to the north and one to the west. • The ADT on Ustick Road is 3,960 vehicles per day and 4,156 vehicles per day on Meridian Road, counts taken on August 2, 2000. • The Ustick/Meridian Road all -way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS B. • With the estimated "background" traffic in year 2005, the Ustick/Meridian Road all -way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS C. • With the estimated "site" plus "background" traffic in the year 2005, the Ustick/Meridian Road all -way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS E. • The study predicts that the Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant will be met for a traffic signal at the Ustick/Meridian Road intersection when the proposed development reaches full build -out - One internal street, Ashton Lane from Ashby Street to Meridian Road, is estimated to exceed 1,000 vehicles per day and is being designed as a collector street. D. Any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road should be located outside of the new right-of-way. E. The applicant is proposing two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270 -feet north of the south property line, and 300 -feet south of the north property line. The proposed entrances are separated by over 800 -feet and are located in conformance with District policy. The roadway entrances should be designed with minimum 21 -foot street sections on either side of a center median. The median should be constructed a minimum of 4 -feet wide to total a minimum of a Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Paee 3 0 • 100 -square foot area. The applicant is proposing to construct two outbound lanes and one inbound lane with a median, within 64 -feet of right-of-way. F. The applicant should be required to constrict center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. G. The applicant should be required to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. H. The applicant is proposing one main entrance on Ustick Road located at the west property line. The proposed entrance is located in conformance with District policy, and the applicant should construct Venable Lane as one half of a 36 -foot street section, plus 12 -feet of additional pavement within 42 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant is not proposing to construct a median at this entrance. I. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. J. The applicant should be required to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. K. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing, because the anticipated traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. The access restrictions for this street segment should be stated on the final plat. The applicant is proposing to construct a 40 - foot street section within 58 -feet of right-of-way, the standard street section for a 3 -lane industrial/commercial street. District policy requires that this street segment be constructed as 46 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 64 -feet of right-of-way. Parking should be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. L. The applicant is proposing to construct three stub streets to the north. The applicant should not be required to provide paved temporary turnarounds at the end of the stub streets because the stubs are less than 100 -feet in length. The applicant should be required to install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. The proposed stub streets are located: • Between Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 Cedar Springs.rev.cnvn Noe 4 M. The applicant is proposing to construct Ashton Lane to the west property line. The applicant should not be required to provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the street because the stub is less than 100 -feet in length. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE" Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. N. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial lot on Meridian Road at the southwest corner of the intersection with the proposed southerly main entrance. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Meridian Road. One driveway is proposed off Ashby Drive. The driveway should be located a minimum of 100 -feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. O. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial or multi -family lot on Ustick Road at the northeast corner of the intersection with the proposed main entrance to the subdivision. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Ustick Road. Driveways should be located a minimum of 100 -feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30 - feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. P. The applicant's site plan indicates a proposed elementary school on Venable Lane located north of Ustick Road. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. Q. Due to the volumes and types of vehicular uses on Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the school site, Venable Lane should be constructed as a local/commercial street. The applicant should construct Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way. R. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. S. The applicant should be required to construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36 -foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50 -feet of right-of- way. T. The public streets within the subdivision should be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- feet(centerline to centerline). It appears that the street layout is in conformance with District policy. U. The turnarounds should be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. V. The applicant's traffic study indicates that full build -out of the subdivision should occur by 2005, and that traffic at the Ustick Road/Meridian Road intersection will warrant a signal by the year Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Paee 5 2005. A traffic signal will cost approximately $120,000. The southwest corner and the southeast corner have been developed. The northeast comer is vacant land, and staff has received a traffic study for a 215 -lot residential subdivision with four office lots on corner. Full build -out of that subdivision is expected by 2005. Staff recommends that this applicant contribute one-quarter of the cost of a traffic signal, $30,000 to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund. The District will also require the same deposit from the developer at the northeast corner. W. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this report. Special Recommendation to the City of Meridian: The City should require the applicant to provide pathways to the City Park site so that pedestrians to not have to access collector roadways for access into the park. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance # 193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 3. Locate any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road outside of the new right-of-way. Cedar Springs.rev.cnun Page 6 4. The two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270 -feet north of the south property line, and 300 -feet south of the north property line, are approved with this application. The entrances shall be designed with two outbound lanes and one inbound lane on either side of a center median, within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4 -feet wide to total a minimum of a 100 -square foot area. 5. Construct center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. 6. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 7. The main entrance on Ustick Road located at the west property line, is approved with this application. Construct Venable Lane as one half of a 36 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement within 42 -feet of right-of-way. 8. Construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 9. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 - feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 10. Construct the segment of Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing. The access restrictions for this street segment shall be stated on the final plat. Construct this segment of Ashton Lane as a 46 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 64 -feet of right-of- way. Parking shall be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. 11. Construct three stub streets to the north, located as proposed: • Between Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 Install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. 12. Construct Ashton Lane to the west property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 7 0' W 13. One driveway on Ashby Drive shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial lot. The driveway shall be located a minimum of 100 -feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. 14. One driveway on Venable Lane shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial/multi-family lot. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 100 -feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. 15. Construct Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way. 16. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. 17. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. 18. Unless otherwise specified, construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36 -foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50 -feet of right-of-way. 19. The public streets within the subdivision shall be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- feet(centerline to centerline). 20. The turnarounds shall be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. 21. Provide a $30,000 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of one-quarter of a traffic signal at the intersection of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. 22. Other than the proposed public streets, direct lot or parcel access to Ustick Road and Meridian Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 8 Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9.00 a m on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its ori inal decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Constriction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 9 No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confinnation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Planning and Development Staff Commission Action: February 7, 2001 Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 10 RECEIVED ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT FEB -5 2001 Planning and Development Division CITY OF MERIDIAN Development Application Report dam, Preliminary Plat — Cedar Springs n/w/c Meridian Road/Ustick Road Modification MAZ-00-019/MPP-00-018 REVISED The application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Cedar Springs is a 268 -lot residential subdivision on 99.8 -acres. The site also includes one office lot and one elementary school site, and one possible multi -family or office/commercial site. The applicant is also requesting annexation into the City of Meridian and a rezone from RUT to R-4. The site is located generally north of Ustick Road on the west side of Meridian Road. This development is estimated to generate 4,168 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. On October 25, 2000, the ACHD Commission reviewed and approved Cedar Springs Subdivision, a 333 -lot residential subdivision. The applicant has modified the site plan. The new plan has fewer residential lots, the addition of office/commercial lots, and a school site. Changes to this report have been made in bold. Roads impacted by this development: Meridian Road Ustick Road ACHD Commission Date — February 7, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. xnim 'age 1 i i Eli )I o e jjjff - - - - - - - M O ' n: •R•'� •0� °" as OWO 'AINnCO wr timmflw woua(MLSNOO TSIAON nnN ! �w sva e�'nr r101Sma8(1S'NI1N301S38 SJNI!!dS kfd030 1`dld ZYNAn3u. • g i i Eli )I o e jjjff - - - - - - - M O ' n: J- E�al' STREET o � (FUTURE CITY PARK) N L �i�cNats/fir �-�ovcd �p CEDAR SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FIGURE 1 D Q O ff z Q 0 w i tA r U•B ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — Leslie Family Trust/Moore Family Trust Applicant — J.U.B. RUT - Existing zoning R-4 - Requested zoning 99.8 - Acres 268 - Proposed residential building lots 1 - Proposed office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) 1 - Proposed office/multi-family lot (Ustick Road) 1 - Proposed elementary school lot 2,566 — vehicle trips per day for single family lots 474 — vehicle trips per day for office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) 418 — vehicle trips per day for office/multi-family lot (Ustick Road) 710 — vehicle trips per day for elementary school site 4,168 — total vehicle trips per day North Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District 255 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Meridian Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 4,156 on 8-2-00 Better than C -Existing Level of Service Better than C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 1,530 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Meridian Road is improved with two traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Ustick Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 3,960 on 8-2-00 Better than C — Existing Level of Service Better than C — Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 460 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Ustick Road is improved with two traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Cedar Springs.revxmn Page 2 B. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. C. The applicant submitted a revised traffic study for this development. The results of the traffic study, and the key findings include: • The proposed project is a 268-lot single family subdivision located near the Ustick Road and Meridian Road intersection. The revised plan also has one office/commercial lot off Meridian Road, one office or multi-family lot (approximately 63 units) off Ustick Road, and an elementary school site. • The estimated build-out year for the subdivision is 2005. • The trip generation is 4,168 vehicle trips per day, or 420 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. • The subdivision proposes one approach to Ustick Road, located west of Meridian Road, and two approaches on Meridian Road, both located north of Ustick Road. • All three proposed approaches have two outbound lanes: a left-turn lane and a right-turn lane. The left-turn movements will operate at LOS A for the three approaches. • The construction of left-turn bays on Ustick Road and Meridian Road for the three proposed subdivision approaches. • There are four stub streets proposed, three to the north and one to the west. • The ADT on Ustick Road is 3,960 vehicles per day and 4,156 vehicles per day on Meridian Road, counts taken on August 2, 2000. • The Ustick/Meridian Road all-way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS a B. • With the estimated "background" traffic in year 2005, the Ustick/Meridian Road all-way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS C. • With the estimated "site" plus "background" traffic in the year 2005, the Ustick/Meridian Road all-way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS E. • The study predicts that the Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant will be met for a traffic signal at the Ustick/Meridian Road intersection when the proposed development reaches full build-out. ftwv z. • One internal street, Ashton Lane from Ashby Street to Meridian Road, is estimated to exceed 1,000 vehicles per day and is being designed as a collector street. D. Any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road should be located outside of the new right-of-way. E. The applicant is proposing two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270-feet north of the south property line, and 300-feet south of the north property line. The proposed entrances are separated by over 800-feet and are located in conformance with District policy. The roadway entrances should be designed with minimum 21-foot street sections on either side of a center median. The median should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. The applicant is proposing to construct two outbound lanes and one inbound lane with a median, within 64-feet of right-of-way. F. The applicant should be required to construct center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 3 • 0 G. The applicant should be required to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. ;a H. The applicant is proposing one main entrance on Ustick Road located at the west property line. The proposed entrance is located in conformance with District policy, and the applicant should construct Venable Lane as one half of a 36 -foot street section, plus 12 -feet of additional pavement within 42 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant is not proposing to construct a median at this entrance. I. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. J. The applicant should be required to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. K. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing, because the anticipated traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. The access restrictions for this street segment should be stated on the final plat. The applicant is proposing to construct a 40 - foot street section within 58 -feet of right-of-way, the standard street section for a 3 -lane industrial/commercial street. District policy requires that this street segment be constructed as 46 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 64 -feet of right-of-way. Parking should be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. L. The applicant is proposing to construct three stub streets to the north. The applicant should not be required to provide paved temporary turnarounds at the end of the stub streets because the stubs are less than 100 -feet in length. The applicant should be required to install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. The proposed stub streets are <._ located: Between Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 ` • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 M. The applicant is proposing to construct Ashton Lane to the west property line. The applicant should not be required to provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the street because the stub is less than 100 -feet in length. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. N. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial lot on Meridian Road at the southwest corner of the intersection with the proposed southerly main entrance. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Meridian Road. One driveway is proposed Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 4 off Ashby Drive. The driveway should be located a minimum of 100-feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30-feet wide. ACHD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. m*w. O. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial or multi-family lot on Ustick Road at the northeast corner of the intersection with the proposed main entrance to the subdivision. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Ustick Road. Driveways should be located a minimum of 100-feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30- feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. P. The applicant's site plan indicates a proposed elementary school on Venable Lane located north of Ustick Road. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. Q. Due to the volumes and types of vehicular uses on Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the school site, Venable Lane should be constructed as a local/commercial street. The applicant should construct Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40-foot street section plus 12-feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42-feet of right-of-way. A kR R. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat v should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. S. The applicant should be required to construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50-feet of right-of- way. T. The public streets within the subdivision should be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- feet(centerline to centerline). It appears that the street layout is in conformance with District policy. U. The turnarounds should be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. V. The applicant's traffic study indicates that full build -out of the subdivision should occur by 2005, and that traffic at the Ustick Road/Meridian Road intersection will warrant a signal by the year 2005. A traffic signal will cost approximately $120,000. The southwest corner and the southeast corner have been developed. The northeast corner is vacant land, and staff has received a traffic study for a 215 -lot residential subdivision with four office lots on corner. Full build -out of that subdivision is expected by 2005. Staff recommends that this applicant contribute one-quarter of the cost of a traffic signal, $30,000 to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund. The District will also require the same deposit from the developer at the northeast corner. W. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this report. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 5 Special Recommendation to the City of Meridian: 1. The City should require the applicant to provide pathways to the City Park site so that pedestrians to not have to access collector roadways for access into the park. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance # 193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 3. Locate any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road outside of the new right-of-way. 4. The two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270 -feet north of the south property line, and 300 -feet south of the north property line, are approved with this application. The entrances shall be designed with two outbound lanes and one inbound lane on either side of a center median, within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4 -feet wide to total a minimum of a 100 -square foot area. 5. Constrict center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff 6. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. Cedar Springs.reV.cnvn Page 6 7. The main entrance on Ustick Road located at the west property line, is approved with this application. Construct Venable Lane as one half of a 36 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement within 42 -feet of right-of-way. S. Construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 9. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 - feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 10. Construct the segment of Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing. The access restrictions for this street segment shall be stated on the final plat. Construct this segment of Ashton Lane as a 46 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 64 -feet of right-of- way. Parking shall be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. 11. Construct three stub streets to the north, located as proposed: • Between Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 ' • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 Install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. 12. Construct Ashton Lane to the west property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. 13. One driveway on Ashby Drive shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial lot. The driveway shall be located a minimum of 100 -feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. 14. One driveway on Venable Lane shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial/multi-family lot. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 100 -feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. 15. Construct Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way. Cedar Springs.revxmm Page 7 16. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. 17. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. 18. Unless otherwise specified, construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36 -foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50 -feet of right-of-way. 19. The public streets within the subdivision shall be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- feet(centerline to centerline). 20. The turnarounds shall be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. tmv�e 21. Provide a $30,000 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of one-quarter of a traffic signal at the intersection of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. N 22. Other than the proposed public streets, direct lot or parcel access to Ustick Road and Meridian Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a m on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 8 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance # 193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit r (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. . 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject " property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff Cedar Springs.revxnun Page 9 MEMORANDUM: To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner ��(_ P4 -L nnce+Irtg Fc cruary i5 , 20o l 14 crn N� 0.5 February 14, 2001 Re: CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION (REVISED) - Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-4 for Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction (File #AZ -00- 019) - Request for Preliminary Plat of 99.83 Acres for 295 Lots by Kevin Howell Construction for a Residential Subdivision in a Proposed R-4 Zone (File #PP -00- 018) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY/BACKGROUND This Staff report is a revision to the 10-06-00 Staff memo regarding the subject applications. It provides a more detailed analysis of the preliminary plat and recommends site specific conditions for both the preliminary plat and annexation applications. Since the 10-06-00 Staff report, the Applicant has made significant modifications to the original plat, including: a. Reducing the total number of building lots from 333 to 268 b. Decreasing the gross density from 3.34 du/acre to 2.68 du/acre C. Adding a 12 -acre elementary school site to the plat d. Adding two office/non-residential use lots to the plat e. Increasing the amount of open space from 5.82 acres to 6.21 acres f. Adding two micropathways Given the scope of the modifications, the preliminary plat application was re -circulated to all agencies and City departments and revised comments were received. In particular, ACHD submitted a revised draft report in which they modified their requirements based on the future school and potential office sites. The external boundaries of the subdivision as originally proposed have not changed. No changes were made to the Annexation application, although Staff did revise the Annexation staff report. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs2.az.pp • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live Robert D. Come CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEiviBERS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 T-unry deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 MEMORANDUM: To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner ��(_ P4 -L nnce+Irtg Fc cruary i5 , 20o l 14 crn N� 0.5 February 14, 2001 Re: CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION (REVISED) - Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-4 for Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction (File #AZ -00- 019) - Request for Preliminary Plat of 99.83 Acres for 295 Lots by Kevin Howell Construction for a Residential Subdivision in a Proposed R-4 Zone (File #PP -00- 018) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY/BACKGROUND This Staff report is a revision to the 10-06-00 Staff memo regarding the subject applications. It provides a more detailed analysis of the preliminary plat and recommends site specific conditions for both the preliminary plat and annexation applications. Since the 10-06-00 Staff report, the Applicant has made significant modifications to the original plat, including: a. Reducing the total number of building lots from 333 to 268 b. Decreasing the gross density from 3.34 du/acre to 2.68 du/acre C. Adding a 12 -acre elementary school site to the plat d. Adding two office/non-residential use lots to the plat e. Increasing the amount of open space from 5.82 acres to 6.21 acres f. Adding two micropathways Given the scope of the modifications, the preliminary plat application was re -circulated to all agencies and City departments and revised comments were received. In particular, ACHD submitted a revised draft report in which they modified their requirements based on the future school and potential office sites. The external boundaries of the subdivision as originally proposed have not changed. No changes were made to the Annexation application, although Staff did revise the Annexation staff report. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs2.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z 0 February 14, 2001 Page 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING GENERAL COMMENTS A detailed analysis of the annexation application was provided in Staffs 10-9-00 report. Daren Fluke of J -U -B Engineers, the Applicant's representative, responded in detail to our analysis in a 10-26-00 letter. Our original recommendation was denial of the annexation request due primarily to three issues: • the lack of school facilities • the lack of housing diversity (lot sizes, housing types) • the lack of sanitary sewer services to the site The revised plat addresses the first two issues. A future elementary school site (Lot 4, Block 1) and a potential multi -family housing site (Lot 2, Block 1) have been added to the plat. Staff strongly supports these modifications. As cited in the original Staff report, Comprehensive Plan Policy #1.19 (Housing Chapter) states that high density housing should be located near parks. We would not support a commercial/retail use on this lot given its close proximity to the future elementary school and the increased traffic that most commercial/retail uses generate. An office use may be appropriate. However, for marketing purposes, the Applicant should be aware that three (3) future office lots in Primeland Subdivision were preliminarily approved on the north side of Ustick just one (1) mile west as well as a potential four -lot office complex at the NE corner of Ustick and Meridian in the proposed Sundance Subdivision. Also, W.H. Moore Company has submitted a letter as part of the current Comprehensive Plan amendment process regarding their intention to construct a large office complex at the NW corner of Ustick and Eagle Road. Should these three (3) office projects receive City approval (Primeland, Sundance and Moore), the office saturation point on Ustick should be considered. Staff feels the multi- family residential use would be the most compatible with the school and park sites. If designed and incorporated into the site well, a low -traffic generating, restricted hours, neighborhood - oriented retail use may also be appropriate on Ustick. The third reason for recommending denial of the annexation related to the White Drain Trunk and the uncertainty of the extension of this line from Ten Mile Road to the west. This remains a significant issue and the City is still in the process of securing all the necessary sanitary sewer easements for the trunk. However, the City has received and formally accepted the Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision applications through which the White Drain would extend. The application is slated for the March 15 meeting of the P&Z Commission. In his 10/31/00 memo to Gary Smith, Gary Lee of J -U -B Engineers stated that Mr. Howell is willing to take the risk to proceed with the preliminary plat approval process and Phase 1 final plat approval on the expectation that the White Drain Trunk will be extended to this site. Mr. Lee recommended including a condition in the Development Agreement that would not allow any construction of the subdivision to proceed until there is more certainty on the White Drain Trunk's construction schedule. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z February 14, 2001 Page 3 ANNEXATION SITE SPECIFIC REQUIRMENTS 1. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City as a condition of annexation. 2. A condition of the Annexation/Development Agreement shall be that the Applicant provide a minimum of five percent (5%) common open space within the legal description boundaries. This requirement was adopted as part of the new Landscape Ordinance. But since the subject applications were submitted prior to City Council adoption of the Landscape Ordinance, they are technically exempt from the standards in that ordinance. However, if deemed to be in its best interest, the City can impose higher standards than are currently adopted as ordinance as conditions of annexation for any development requesting annexation into the City. The open space shall be exclusive of all street rights-of-way and street buffers, except for right-of-way specifically dedicated for landscaping within a subdivision. Stormwater detention facilities must be designed in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Landscape Ordinance in order to count toward the open space requirement. Open space may be active or passive in its intended use, and must be accessible by all residents of the subdivision. Common open space shall be suitably improved for its intended use. At a minimum, common open space lots shall include one (1) deciduous shade tree per eight thousand (8,000) square feet and lawn, either seed or sod. The Preliminary Plat's "Site Data" calculations show that 6.2% of the subdivision's gross acreage is open space. The Applicant should review the above criteria for what is allowable open space and confirm that the minimum 5% requirement is still met and that the stormwater facilities will be desimed to the standards of Section 11.2 of the Landscape Ordinance. Be prepared to address this at the P&Z Commission hearing. It is unclear to Staff if the 6.2% includes or excludes the Meridian and Ustick Road street buffers and the three (3), 25 -foot Settlers Irrigation common lots along the north property line. The 20 -foot landscape buffers along Ashton Drive and Ashby Drive at the Meridian Road entrance points, the landscape medians, and the common lot ped paths can count toward the 5% minimum. 3. Due to the single-family uses abutting the east boundary of Lot 34, Block 1 (proposed as future office use), a minimum 20 -foot planting strip, in accordance with City Ordinance 12- 4-7.A., is required along the west property line of this lot and shall be a condition attached to this property in the Development Agreement. 4. The Applicant has noted that Lots 2 and 34, Block 1, are intended as future office, commercial or multi -family lots. However, the current Comprehensive Plan does not support office, commercial or high density zoning. These lots may be annexed with an R-4 zone but shall be restricted from obtaining any building permits until these two lots are formally rezoned to the L -O or other zone which allows the future proposed uses. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z February 14, 2001 Page 4 5. A detached sidewalk with a minimum 5 -foot -wide planter strip between the curb and sidewalk shall be required along the Meridian Road frontage. 6. A condition in the Development Agreement shall be that no subdivision infrastructure improvements can begin until the White Drain Sewer Trunk's easements are finalized by the City and the trunk construction schedule is finalized with the civil contractor that is awarded the bid. ANNEXATION & ZONING - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 4. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas in the proposed future commercial lots. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on- site. 6. Off-street parking shall be provided in the proposed future commercial lots in accordance with the City of Meridian Ordinance 11-13 for use of property. 7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z . February 14, 2001 Page 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development will have to be provided by the future White Trunk Sewer. The Trunk alignment/construction is totally dependent on whether or not the subdivision layout of the future Bridgetower Subdivision on the east side of Ten Mile, north of Ustick, is satisfactory to the City, ACRD, the irrigation district and other agencies, and that the appropriate easements can be obtained. If this future phase of Bridgetower is approved (which will be reviewed at the 3-15-01 P&Z Commission hearing), the Public Works Department would proceed with surveying and easements procurement along the proposed route. Approximately 3 to 4 months of design time, followed by 6 or so months of construction is expected. The Public Works Department anticipates the trunk being completed by the end of 2001, assuming a relatively smooth approval process. This proposed development can not be provided sanitary sewer service by gravity into any other existing city sewer system. When sewer is available, applicant will be responsible to construct sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2. Water service to this development shall be via extensions from the existing main in Ustick Road adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to construct water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. 3. Underground pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Due to the size of the landscaped areas, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. The preliminary plat map does not indicate the irrigation source or proposed service or pump locations. Applicant must submit a revised plat prior to the City Council hearing showing service locations and source for the irrigation water. The irrigation pump station for the subdivision must be located on a common lot, designated as such on the plat.. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 4. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. Applicant should clarify this in writing prior to the public hearing. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process, and a draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs2.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z February 14, 2001 Page 6 O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval 5. To date, Settlers Irrigation District has not submitted a response to the preliminary plat transmittal. The plat shows what appears to be a 25 -foot wide irrigation easement along the north property line. However, there are no easement delineations or notes explaining this area. Applicant should clarify at the hearing their intentions for these three common lots, the Settlers Irrigation District conditions for use of this facility, and how fencing along the easement will be handled. 6. ACHD's Site Specific Requirements #7 and #15 on page 7 of their revised report require conflicting street section widths for N. Venable Lane. One requires a 36 -foot section and the other requires a 40 -foot section. Applicant should clarify for the record. 7. ACHD's Site Specific Requirement #10 (pg. 7) classifies Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing. The street is required to provide 64 -feet of right-of-way to Greenwich. However, the revised preliminary plat only shows the 64 -foot width to N. Byron Place and then reduces to a 58 -foot right-of-way until Ashby Drive. Applicant should clarify ACHD's condition for the record. If the collector status is required to Greenwich and front -on housing is restricted, 13 lots will not meet the minimum 80 -foot frontage requirement on the connecting local streets. These lots include: Lots 1 and 7, Block 11, Lot 1, Block 12, Lots 1, 18 and 19, Block 6, Lots 16 and 17, Block 14, Lot 17, Block 16, and Lots 6-9, Block 5. The Applicant must be prepared to address ACHD's requirement and how these 13 lots will comply with the minimum frontage if they can't front on Ashton Drive. 8. The micropath at the NW corner of the future park must be relocated to the west so it serves the future school site instead of the park. The park master plan does not accommodate a pedestrian access into the park at this location. 9. Staff recommends that an additional micropath be provided at the west end of Block 17, possibly between Lots 7/8 and Lots 24/25, in order to improve pedestrian accessibility from the NW portion of the subdivision to the school and park sites. 10. Staff have some concern about how children residing on the south side of Ustick Road will access the school site at the Venable Lane intersection. While there is currently limited residential in this area, the Comp Plan designates the entire south side of Ustick as single family residential. ACHD is requiring a center turn lane at this intersection but not a signal or crosswalk to facilitate a safe pedestrian crossing. The Applicant and Commission should address this concern at the public hearing. 11. During two different pre -application meetings held with the Applicant and his representatives in July and August, 2000, Staff presented the possibility of designing W. Ashby Drive as a single -loaded street. One concept discussed was townhomes or other higher density housing that would front on the north side of Ashby and the south side would remain open for greater accessibility into the park site. Due to the significant cost AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z . February 14, 2001 Page 7 of re -design, the Applicant was not amenable to the concept. Subsequently, Tom Kuntz of the Parks Department has also presented the concept to the Applicant's representative. In his 1-29-01 letter to Mr. Kuntz, Matthew Schultz of J -U -B Engineers stated that he felt the design as submitted has many merits and "does not warrant revision. The addition of a single -loaded street along the north boundary (of the park) will require a wholesale revision of the 100 -acre preliminary plat layout." The Parks & Recreation Commission are strongly in favor of having the park accessible from Ashby Drive. Representatives from the P&R Commission intend to testify at the P&Z Commission hearing on this matter. 12. Three (3) copies of a detailed landscape plan for the street buffers, open space common lots and the Lot 34, Block 1 land use buffer, including a detailed fencing plan, shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the final plat application. The plan must include sizes and species of trees, shrubs, berming/swale details, and all proposed ground cover/treatment. A mix of tree species is required per Ordinance 12-13. No fencing will be permitted within the required landscape buffers. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to City signature on the Final Plat. All required landscaping shall be constructed prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy for the future buildings. All perimeter fencing shall be installed prior to applying for building permits. 13. The Meridian Road and Ustick Road landscape buffers shall be a minimum of 35 feet and 25 feet in width respectively, constructed beyond the required ACRD right-of-way and constructed by the developer as a condition of the plat. The landscape buffers shall be placed in common separate lots as shown. Fencing is not to encroach upon these buffers. 14. Six -foot -high, solid, perimeter fencing shall be required along the full northern and western boundaries of the subdivision, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Director. Fencing adjacent to the future City park should be determined in coordination with the Parks & Recreation Department. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. A letter of credit or cash will be required for these fences prior to signature on the final plat. 15. Notes #3 and #8 refer to "Amherst" Subdivision. Correct to read "Cedar Springs." 16. If possible, please reply in writing to these comments by 12:00 noon on Wednesday, 2- 14-01. Submit ten copies of the revised Preliminary Plat Map to the City Clerk's Office within ten days after the P&Z Commission public hearing. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs2.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z • February 14, 2001 Page 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names with the final plat application. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance 12-5-2.K. 4. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 5. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project Shall be tiled per City Ordinance No. 12-4-13, except as provided for under site specific requirements. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 6. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 7. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all common landscape areas on the site. 8. Two -hundred -fifty watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 9. Indicate on the final plat map any FEMA Flood Plains affecting the area being platted, and detail plans for reducing or eliminating the boundary. 10. Assessment fees for water and sewer service will be determined during the building plan review process. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs2.az.pp 0 • January 16, 2001 1f, MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING January d, 2001 APPLICANT Kevin Howell ITEM NO. 2 REQUEST Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposedCedar Springs Subdivision NW of Meridian Road and Ustick Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: SANITARY SERVICE: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: COMMENTS See Previous Item Packet INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: See attached letter from aDDlicant Contacted: Date: %(-p rO/ Phone: O /(j - / Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. I; liI I, I, II I� 'I I, I� W. USTICK ROAD / STREET o (FUTURE CITY PARK) CEDAR SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FIGURE 1 .. r U•B ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS - PLANNERS BARRY PETERS Oloment H04366 of u:. Wlwber 19153. to Th► PahZ�ae�� w ndah�". . 2089392692 .� • .. ► R THIS IlmPN!'I[pE, blade ehia 21st day of Naroh !a tie year or our Lord one thousqa 131n. tnindrod and e18bt ' SETWM Clement Hedges and Ell sa.A.lLdges 'M jband '&r4 wife County o[ Ada of lkridisn taste or Idaho the parties of the first part, and the Public tar uoe as a public hlghwey of County of Ade, State or Idaho the partlea o[ the $e0ond pert; WIM&WILIMP That the said party of the first part, for "d in Conalderobion of the sun of one and no/'1pp DOUARS of the United xb St of Arloa, to tDor lnhand paid by the said parti60 of tbs 6400rd part, the reosipt whereof le hereby acknowledged he.., RE3CSED, RELEASRD aM forsiOr QUIT-CLAINED, and by thgeo prose nte do,.. pE3Qgg, > ,EASE AND Forster QOITCLAIy unto the said pert.... of the eeooz.3 pert, and to their heirs and assigns forever all t he following daecribod real aerate aituata in the Couritr at AAs, and crate of Idaho, asci bounded and rn►rtlaularly described do fallows to wit: A strip of larA twenty nirta(2g) feet wide oft or the *set aide of the east hal! (E4) of the Fbst ;halt (g�) of the Southwest quarter (Mli-) or Section Thirty six (36) township [aur (4) north o! rn B.H. nga one (1) meet of '!'OOBTHM With 611 and .ningular the tenemazts, heredicaewnta and sp��SLe�noe* thereunto belongdog or in •uy wise appertaining, end Cho reverst¢n aha d &?'rn lten remi�rior and rsmaindars, rents, i$eues and profit$ thereof, 20'HAVF AND TO HOLD, All sad singular the said presises tOMther Kith the npiurten --anosa unto the ps.rties•of the ssoond pert, and to their hetRa And assign* forever. WHEREOP IN a days and The said parties of the riret part have hereursto set hands and seals LIy doy, and year tiRot obova written. SIMad, sealed And delivered In the preeenoo of N.C.BLaokburn 1 Clonent Hedgse (SEAY,j ( FJSao,A.Rerige*, S2ATB OF IDAHO) (SEAL) OOUNTy' OF ADA )eg s trig 21st day of lbroh 1908 Dororo me' In and for gala CountRW-C.Blaokburn a Notary Publlo wife lmo'a to me to bethe appeared Clement Kadgee and 5L1aa,A.Redges busbarA &dd ead acknowledged to as that they�=socueed tAMSH **nee °LLbecrlbWA to the within lnetrument, IN RI4NMI"FRE09, I have hereunto sot HW hhnd And e[fi2ed MW offiolel aeal the drY anud year In this oer11[lcats first aWiove written. (SM) .. .. Notary -public *.Commission expires May 1, 1910A.C-ALaakni-n iscordOd at the requeot of w•O,Sleokburn at 9:50 a,m. Nah 25, 190(g. Fee AA:20. 7�4 Recorder. p�l APR 17 101 16:03 20e9392692 PAGE.03 P. aS ** TX CONFIRMHI'ION REPORT ** AS OF APR 17 017:27 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN 101 Eagle Glen Lane, Suhe A Eagle. Idaho 83616 Attorney at Law, P.A. Admitted to PraC6Ce in Idaho & California RECEIVED APR 17 2001 CITY W MERIDIAN Telephone: (208) 939.2600 Facsimlle: (208) 939-2692 NUM M OF PACES RMC mtAN$drn* 0 e 2 1F ALL PACES A22E NOT Ri MVED,1LEAM MX MOVE MARY AT Cob) 931`2692 TIWM T13E ORJGINAL OF TMS TR=O=Y WILL U SENT BY BWtrAR MAJL FAX fQJN%rkR, 000 89&021! FAX NUMBER: (2oa) 2MMI April 17, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Cedar Springs Annexation and Preliminary plat Applications Case No. A2-00-019 Case No. Pp -00-018 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council! This office represents John Kennedy who owns property adjacent to the northwest corner of the proposed Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision. Mr. Kennedy brought this proposed plat to MY attention today with concerns regarding access to his property. I am enclosing with this letter a copy of the 1908 Deed which established the public right-of-way for what is now designated as North Venable bane. As you will note, the right-of- way extends the full length of what is now proposed as the Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision. However, the preliminary plat being submitted in connection with this property only provides for in Lane to extend about two-thirds of the way toward the north end of the Property. This will leave my clients property essentially landlocked. For that reason, Mr. Kennedy vehemently opposes the approval of this subdivision as submitted. APR 17 101 16=02 2089392692 DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS 27 04/17 17:22 PUBLIC WORKS OF --S 00'41" 003 198 OK 28 04/17 17:23 1 208 466 4405 EC --S 01'04" 003 198 OK 29 04/17 17:24 8866854 EC --S 00'53" 003 198 OK 30---04/17 17:26 8950390 EC --S 00'52" 003 198 OK 101 Eagle Glen Lane, Suhe A Eagle. Idaho 83616 Attorney at Law, P.A. Admitted to PraC6Ce in Idaho & California RECEIVED APR 17 2001 CITY W MERIDIAN Telephone: (208) 939.2600 Facsimlle: (208) 939-2692 NUM M OF PACES RMC mtAN$drn* 0 e 2 1F ALL PACES A22E NOT Ri MVED,1LEAM MX MOVE MARY AT Cob) 931`2692 TIWM T13E ORJGINAL OF TMS TR=O=Y WILL U SENT BY BWtrAR MAJL FAX fQJN%rkR, 000 89&021! FAX NUMBER: (2oa) 2MMI April 17, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Cedar Springs Annexation and Preliminary plat Applications Case No. A2-00-019 Case No. Pp -00-018 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council! This office represents John Kennedy who owns property adjacent to the northwest corner of the proposed Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision. Mr. Kennedy brought this proposed plat to MY attention today with concerns regarding access to his property. I am enclosing with this letter a copy of the 1908 Deed which established the public right-of-way for what is now designated as North Venable bane. As you will note, the right-of- way extends the full length of what is now proposed as the Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision. However, the preliminary plat being submitted in connection with this property only provides for in Lane to extend about two-thirds of the way toward the north end of the Property. This will leave my clients property essentially landlocked. For that reason, Mr. Kennedy vehemently opposes the approval of this subdivision as submitted. APR 17 101 16=02 2089392692 POSITION STATEMENT RECEIVE '�` tease Wo. PP -00-018 Name of Applicant: Cedar Springs `��' V\ (V� - f I ! ARi 2601 - To: Meridian City Council CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY rl_FRK OFFICE From: Meridian Planning & Zoning Staff I have reviewed the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission with which I disagree as follows: The following Findings and/or Recommendations should be deleted: §§ Recommendation 6 (pg. 3): (This discrepancy clarified in ACHD's revised report) §§ Recommendation 7 (pg. 4): (This discrepancy clarified in ACHD's revised report) §§ Recommendation 9 (pg. 4): (Already included in revised plat) The following Findings and/or Recommendations should be modified: (recommended deletions-&_�) (recommended corrections/additions in bold) manner: develop a 23-33 64 buildableapplicant psingle-familly lotoses to develop the d 25 subject nlots property in § Recommendation 5 (pg. 3): 3rd line ofparagraph –. . . However, there are no easement delineations or notes explaining this area. Applicant shall add easement delineations to preliminary plat. Applicant sal l e -]a v -r-1- ,_ _ _ �—.5 ie e + " '' in to construct perimeter fencing on the Settlers a �� easement line. § 11 Recommendation: Last a lines of paragraph -- ...Representatives from the P&R Commission intend to testify at the D-P•Z nc.:u==i%iefl City Council hearing on this matter. The Planning and Zoning Commission does not recommend the single -loaded street design. Dated this J 3t" day of W,� 2001. Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. Received in the record: / By: William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk L� MEMORANDUM E Tammy de Weerd, Meridian City Council 2090 W. Chateau Drive Meridian, ID 83642 (208) 887-3747 RECEIVED APR 15 2001 TO: Mayor Corrie and City Council Members CITY OF MERIDIAN FROM: Tammy de Weerd DATE: April 15, 2001 RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision As you all are aware, I will not be present for the City Council meeting this Tuesday, April 17 at which the City is to consider the proposal for Cedar Springs Subdivision. There are a number of issues with this subdivision that I am sure staff will raise in their comments, but I feel strongly about one item in particular that I wanted to comment on. While I question the timing of this application in light of the delivery of city services (sewer and safety services) and the mixed-use issues that most likely will be addressed with the comprehensive plan update and/or the planned development ordinance currently in the public hearing stage, this issue is also one of policy. This proposed subdivision surrounds, on two sides, our City's largest park that will begin development of Phase I this summer. This will be our City's premier park and most likely will be the only one of this size. This is an important amenity of the City and it's citizens and safety and design is of utmost importance. The proposal submitted has development abutting both sides of this park to the west and north. I share the sentiments of staff (Parks, P&Z, Fire, Police) and the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommended policy to keep parks of this size open with frontage roads on at least three of the four sides of the park. Ustick and Meridian Roads keep the park open to the south and east, and for safety reasons, either the west or the north side should remain open, with a frontage road, to the park as well. Cedar Springs as designed, with the proposed school site and business or multi -family to the west, and the houses backed up to the park on the north, creates a huge safety concern and vision handicap. Please consider this policy and safety aspect in the decision process for the proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision. Thank you for considering these comments in your recommendation. Page 1 of 1 Will Berg From: TdeWeerd@aol.com Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 2:11 PM To: bergw@ci.meridian. id. us; andersonr@ci.nampa.id.us; rackem@gwest.net; cherie919@qwest.net; corrieb@ci. meridian. id. us Cc: stiless@ci. meridian. id. us; kuntzt@ci.meridian.id.us Subject: RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision comments Hi all, I have attached a memo with my comments regarding Cedar Springs Subdivision that will be heard at the City Council meeting on Tuesday. Will, if you could make sure hard copies are made to the appropriate people I would appreciate it tremendously. Thanks for allowing the ability to share my comments on this proposal. Have a good meeting. Tammy 4/16/01 Meridian Parks & Recreation RECEIVED APR 13 2001 Memo CITY OF MERIDIAN To: Planning and Zoning Commission, Mayor Corrie, City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission From: Tom Kuntz K Date: 03-14-01 Re: Negotiation of single loaded street in Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction At the February 15 Planning and Zoning meeting, the Commission recommended the City Parks Department meet with the developer of Cedar Springs Subdivision to resolve the single loaded street issue. On February 22, the Parks staff met with sp representatives thesfrom conclus conclusion ofdtheemeeting, two discuss possible to solutions to the street options were left on the table without a viable compromise. The Parks Staff recommends the developer combine eight to ten existing lots into one common lot along the northwest park boundary (see attachment A). This common lot would help the developer meet the 5% open space requirement, and address the Parks Department's concerns about visibility and safety in the park. The developer did not support this recommendation due to traffic concerns. The Parks staff believes the developers concerns about increased traffic could be mitigated by prohibiting on street parking on the south side of Alexis Drive. In exchange for a single loaded street, the developer offered to construct a road from the North Venable Lane into the northwest comer of the park. The Park staff does not support this option for three reasons; (1) the building lots on Alexis Drive would be bordered on two sides by a street or parking lot (attachment h). This is prohibited by City Ordinance #12-4-5 (which states all blocks shallloaded street. e(3) Itdouble wou would meet the This would invite more traffic than the sing original purpose of a single loaded street and ad'acent pwas to ublic street into the northwest enforcement the opportunity to perform 'drive by views from J corner of the park. 9 Page 1 »....,. ... s "�• �'�••'� eouor.uelm TUVMW MARX _ mQrbwa3 Notmicens-m NmismiMNIUdstrva30 �t wt ^� •1 ! !It I 7a 1WW ,► • �I .I Is iNil 11, i1 • LI •. • � /fjlj � f � � / 1 � • ' � f .� 1 LIM - )1 -41 -.-11 .-11 . 11 * I Y rryOIL '4 I 1 I I 1 I • I a _ i 711 �t wt ^� •1 ! !It I 7a o v — w ^ •, N !t M ' I • LI •. • � /fjlj � f � � / 1 � • ' � f .� 1 LIM - )1 -41 -.-11 .-11 . 11 * I Y rryOIL '4 I 1 I I 1 I • I a 1.� 711 �t wt ^� •1 _ �� 7a o v • LI •. • � /fjlj � f � � / 1 � • ' � f .� 1 LIM - )1 -41 -.-11 .-11 . 11 * I Y rryOIL '4 I 1 I I 1 I • I a 1.� 711 �t wt ^� •1 _ �� 7a �— — w ^ •, N !t M • LI •. • � /fjlj � f � � / 1 � • ' � f .� 1 LIM - )1 -41 -.-11 .-11 . 11 * I Y rryOIL '4 I 1 I I 1 I • I a 0 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. i U -B RECEIVED ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS APR 13 2001 Regional Office 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 CITY OF MERIDIAN Boise, ID 83709-0944 208-376-7330 April 12, 2001 Fax: 208-323-9336 Will Berg, City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision Annexation and Preiinninary Plat Applications Dear Mr. Berg: On behalf of my client, Kevin Howell Development, we are requesting a continuance for the annexation and preliminary plat applications scheduled at Meridian City Council on April 17, 2001. We will require time to discuss some issues recently brought to our attention by staff. Please continue these items to the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting. Contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Matthew B. Schultz, P. . Project Engineer MBS:Ihc cc: Kevin Howell, Kevin Howell Development f:\projects\11644\admin\continue request.doc 04/12/01 11:45 f'J-U-B,A April 12, 2001 $208 323 9336 i Will Berg, City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Dear Mr. Berg: J -Li -B ENG. BOISE X00 J -U-8 ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS - PLANNERS Regional Office 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208-376-7330 Fax: 208-323-9336 RECEIVED APR 12 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision Annexation and Preliminary Plat Applications On behalf of my client, Kevin Howell Development, we are requesting a continuance for the annexation and preliminary plat applications scheduled at Meridian City Council on April 17, 2001. We will require time to discuss some issues recently brought to our attention by staff. Please continue these items to the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting. Contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Matthew B. Schultz, P. . Project Engineer MBS:Ihc cc: Kevin Howell, Kevin Howell Development fAprojects\11644\admin\continue request.doc APR 12 101 11:50 208 323 9336 PAGE.02 04/12/01 11:44 c uJ FAX: 208/323-9336 V208 323 9336 0 J -U -B ENG. BOISE Ll 10001/002 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSMITTAL TO: Will Berg, City Clerk COMPANY: City of Meridian FAX NUMBER: 887-4813 FROM: Matt Schultz SUBJECT: Date: 4/12/01 Pages (including this page): Time: J -U -B Project No. If you do not receive all of the pages, please call 208/376-7330, or notify by FAX: 203/323-9336. APR 12 '01 11:50 208 323 9336 PAGE.01 WHITE PETERSON WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIGRAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. KEVIN E. DINIUS CHRISTOPHER S. NYE JULIE KL&N FISCHER PHILIP A. PErERsON Wm. F. QGRAY, III ERIC S. RossMAN BRENT J. JOHNSON TODD A. ROSsMAN D. SAMUEL. JOHNSON DAVID M. SWARTLEY LARRY D. MOORE TERRENCE R. WHITE" WILLIAM A. MoRRow NICHOLAS L. WOLLEN WILLIAM F. NICHOLS* *Also admitted in OR ** Also admitted in WA To: Staff Applicant Affected Property Owner(s) Re: Application Case No. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 EAST CARLTON AvE., SUITE 31 POST OFFICE Box1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL (208) 288-2499 FAX (208) 288*2501 E-MAIL: @WPPMG.COM April 2, 2001 AZ -00-019 NAWA OFFICE 5700 E. FRANKLIN RD., STEL 200 NAMPA, IDAHO 83687-8402 TEL. 208 466-9272 FAX (�08 4664405 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE RECEIVED APR - 2 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the 'City Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Planningand Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must decie, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is important to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings before the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: 1. That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be prepared to state yourposition on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and 2. That you carefully complete (be sure it is le 'ble) the Position Statement if You disagree with the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you prepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. If that is not possible, please present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The co Hes will be Cresented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the ity Attorney. If you are a part of a group, it is strongly recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, which can be signed by the representative for the group. Very truly yours, City Attorney's Office Iy/ C C i�( 211-� • BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 100.71 ACRES FOR CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION BY IkEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION Case No. AZ -00-019 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 1. The property is approximately 100.71 acres in size and is located at the northwest corner of Meridian and Ustick Roads on the north and west sides of the future City park. The property is designated as Cedar Springs Subdivision. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is the Leslie Family Trust and the Moore Family Trust, of Eagle, Idaho. 3. Applicant is Kevin Howell Development, of Boise, Idaho. 4. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as RUT. 5. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as R-4. 6. The subject property is bordered to the north, east and west by Ada County RUT zoning, and to the south by agricultural land for the proposed City Park, zoned Limited Office. 7. The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - I ANNEXATION AND ZONING - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION - KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION • 8. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: develop 333 buildable lots and 25 common lots. 10. The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as R-4 which is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. 11. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. RECOMMENDATION 1. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the requested annexation and zoning as requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application, subject to the following: Adopt the Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 1. A cost benefit analysis shall be prepared by the Applicant detailing the overall projected costs to the City to serve the new homes and how this subdivision benefits the community as a whole. 2. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City as a condition of annexation. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION - KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION 0 • 3. A condition of the Annexation/Development Agreement shall be that the Applicant provide a minimum of five percent (5%) common open space within the legal description boundaries. 4. The open space shall be exclusive of all street rights-of-way and street buffers, except for right-of-way specifically dedicated for landscaping within a subdivision. Stormwater detention facilities must be designed in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Landscape Ordinance in order to count toward the open space requirement. Open space may be active or passive in its intended use, and must be accessible by all residents of the subdivision. Common open space shall be suitably improved for its intended use. At a minimum, common open space lots shall include one (1) deciduous shade tree per eight thousand (8,000) square feet and lawn, either seed or sod. 5. The Preliminary Plat's "Site Data" calculations show that 6.2% of the subdivision's gross acreage is open space. The Applicant should review the above criteria for what is allowable open space and confirm that the minimum 5% requirement is still met and that the stormwater facilities will be designed to the standards of Section 11.2 of the Landscape Ordinance. The 20 -foot landscape buffers along Ashton Drive and Ashby Drive at the Meridian Road entrance points, the landscape medians, and the common lot pedestrian paths can count toward the 5% minimum. 6. Due to the single-family uses abutting the east boundary of Lot 34, Block 1 (proposed as future office use), a minimum 20 -foot planting strip, in accordance with City Ordinance 12-4-7.A., is required along the west property line of this lot and shall be a condition attached to this property in the Development Agreement. 7. The Applicant has noted that Lots 2 and 34, Block 1, are intended as future office, commercial or multi -family lots. However, the current Comprehensive Plan does not support office, commercial or high density zoning. These lots may be annexed with an R-4 zone but shall be restricted from obtaining any building permits until these two lots are formally rezoned to the L -O or other zone which allows the future proposed uses. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3 ANNEXATION AND ZONING - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION - KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION 0 0 8. A detached sidewalk with a minimum 5 -foot -wide planter strip between the curb and sidewalk shall be required along the Meridian Road frontage. 9. A condition in the Development Agreement shall be that no subdivision infrastructure improvements can begin until the White Drain Sewer Trunk's easements are finalized by the City and the trunk construction schedule is finalized with the civil contractor that is awarded the bid. 10. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 11. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 12. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 13. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 14. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas in the proposed future commercial lots. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 15. Off-street parking shall be provided in the proposed future commercial RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 4 ANNEXATION AND ZONING - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION - KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION 0 0 lots in accordance with the City of Meridian Ordinance 11-13 for use of property. 16. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 17. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 18. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 1y/Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Recommendations\AZ019CedarSprings.wpd RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 5 ANNEXATION AND ZONING - CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION - KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION March 12, 2001 AZ 00-019 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING March 15, 2001 APPLICANT J -U -B Engineers, Inc ITEM NO. $ REQUEST Request for annexation and zoning of 100.71 acres from Ada County RUT zone to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision -- north of Ustick Road and west of Meridian Road Eagle Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: SANITARY SERVICE: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: See previous Item Packet Contacted: Date: 2 Phone:,—[, Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. L • February 9, 2001 AZ 00-019 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING February 15, 2001 APPLICANT J -U -B Engineers, Inc ITEM NO. 4 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing: Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 acres from Ada County RUT zone to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision - north of Ustick Road and west of Meridian Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: SANITARY SERVICE: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: See previous Item Packet ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See attached draft report J CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIC IDAHO POWER: U"' US WEST: r_Jt� INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: J �(�j �Gt,�n(,(/) ��� Date: IZ Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. February 15, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 400 Meridian, ID 83642 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 RE: Response to Staff Report dated February 15, 2001 Cedar Springs Subdivision Members of the Commission: 208-376-7330 FAX: 208-323-9336 PcF'TvE1D FEB 15 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN We are in receipt of the staff report for Cedar Springs Subdivision and offer the following responses to the issues raised therein. For ease of use we have addressed any issues in the order they appear in the staff report. Requirement #2, pg. 3, requiring 5% open space within the development. As requested we have analyzed our open space relative to the newly adopted landscaping ordinance. Of the total amount of open space provided, 3.14 acres or 3.14% of the total land area complies with the provisions of the ordinance. We will fully comply with the provisions of the ordinance for the design and maintenance of the open space but must reiterate the comments of staff noting that our application was submitted well before the adoption of the landscape ordinance. To fully comply with the 5% requirement would require eliminating approximately ten lots. Had the ordinance been adopted at the time of design we would have of course complied. However, we have already eliminated 65 lots for the addition of a school site and do not feel that the loss of an additional ten lots is warranted, especially given the proximity of a regional park on our southern boundary. Requirement #3, pg. 3, requiring a buffer between lot 34 and future L-0 site to the east. The proposed L-0 site is currently requested to be zoned R-4. The site will require both a rezone and a conditional use to be developed and any buffering would be properly addressed at that time. Requirement #5, pg. 4, requiring a planter strip on Meridian Road. The Ada County Highway District has required that the sidewalk on Meridian Road be placed two feet within the new right-of-way. We are amendable to placing landscaping within the right-of-way provided that the District will grant a license agreement to do so. Requirement #3, pg. 5, pertaining to irrigation service. The irrigation pump facility is proposed to be located within the common landscape area along Meridian Road and the alignment of the irrigation supply ditch for the area. The final plans will detail the exact location. Requirement #4, pg. 5, pertaining to ownership and maintenance of the pressurized irrigation system. We intend to have the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District own and maintain the pressurized irrigation system. The application to accomplish this is currently being completed. t«? l • fJ . UCity of Meridian February 15, 2001 Engineers Surveyors Planners Page 2 Requirement #5, pg. 5, pertaining to the irrigation easement on the north boundary. The Settler's Irrigation District easement on the north property line will be maintained. We have provided a 25' common lot to accommodate the easement in accordance with the District's policies. A 6' solid cedar fence will be provided on the north boundary of the lots abutting the 25' common lot. Requirement #6, pg. 6, pertaining to Venable Lane. The District is requiring a 40' street section to the north of the school, the remainder of the road is required to be a 36' street section. See attached email from Christy Richardson to Gary Lee, dated February 13, 2001. Requirement #7, pg. 6, pertaining to Ashton Lane. Our traffic study documented a need for a residential collector to Ashby Drive, not Greenwich Way. We are working with the Highway District to clarify what appears to be a clerical error. Requirement #8, pg. 6, pertaining to relocation of the park micro -path. We coordinated the location of the path with both the Meridian School District and the Meridian Parks Department. We can certainly move the path but believe that the proposed location works well for both the park and the school. Requirement #9, pg. 6, additional micro -path. The requested path makes good sense and are amenable to a condition requiring such. Requirement #10, pg. 6, pertaining to a pedestrian crossing on Ustick Road. We certainly agree with the staff that development of an elementary school and a regional park could necessitate construction of a controlled pedestrian crossing and/or a signal. However, our traffic study clearly showed that our development does not warrant construction of a signal at this location. We are required to contribute $30,000 above and beyond the required impact fees for construction of a signal at the Ustick/Meridian Road intersection. We suggest that the Commission evaluate the need for a signal upon a development request for the park and/or the school and condition those applications accordingly. Requirement #11, pg. 6, pertaining to a single loaded road adjoining the park. See below. OTHER ISSUES Availability of sewer We are of course aware of the lack of sewer at the present time. As the Commission is no doubt aware, the delay is attributable to a downstream property owner who has been unwitting/ unable to grant easements for the future White Trunk Line until development plans for the property were finalized. The plans have been finalized and submitted to the City for approval in the form of an annexation, conditional use, and preliminary plat application. At a workshop before the City Council U:\Dsf\Cedar Springs\2-15 response.DOC f'J • UCity of Meridian February 15, 2001 Eng neers Surveyors Planners Page 3 on February 13, 2001, said land owner's representative stated on the record that the land owner has no problem with granting the easements and that the alignments have been delivered to the Public Works Department and the city's design consultant on disk and that the City had not asked for the easement up to that time. We further understand that the City Council has placed a priority on the design and construction of the required trunk line. For these reasons we have a high degree of confidence that the line will be built within the near term and view any current complications as simply a matter of timing. We fully understand that we cannot record a final plat without the trunk but would like to proceed with the final design and construction of the subdivision so that we can simply hook in upon the arrival of the trunk line at our property line. We have designed the trunk line through our development in accordance with the sewer master plan and have submitted preliminary plan and profiles for our segment of the line to the City and the City's design consultant to incorporate into the design of the White Trunk Line. We are comfortable with a condition of approval requiring physical hookup to the line prior to the City's signature of the final plat and ask the Commission to send the application to the City Council with a recommendation of approval contingent upon such a condition. Treatment of the park boundary We are in receipt of the unsigned memo from the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff to the Planning and Zoning Commission, Mayor Corrie and the City Council dated 2-14-01 wherein the Commission is requested to require a complete redesign of our preliminary plat to provide a single Loaded road along the north boundary of the park site (our southern boundary). We received the memo by fax only this morning (2-15-01). We will deal with the merits of the request but feet that we must point out our extreme disappointment with how this whole matter has been handled. In particular, the closing line of the third paragraph ('The developer chose to ignore the request due to potential loss of building lots.") is simply untrue and is counterproductive to a mutually acceptable solution. In the 2-14 memo, it is stated that the concept of a single loaded road was discussed at two predevelopment meetings in July and November. In point of fact, we discussed our layout relative to the park at least three times with Tom Kuntz prior to design of the plat and submittal of the application. We are able to document two of those discussions (see attached) and at no time was the topic of a single loaded road mentioned. In fact, Mr. Kuntz commented on the location of our proposed pathway connections saying that they seemed to work fine with the master plan that was currently under development. Prior to our submittal of the preliminary plat in September, our pedestrian access and utility stub locations were submitted and revised pursuant to the direction of Mr. Kuntz. Since the original submittal in August, our item has been continued primarily due to the White Trunk Line delay. At the same time, we were worked closely with the Joint School District No. 2 to delete approximately 65 building lots and add an elementary school to the site plan. The single -loaded street concept was first mentioned by Mr. Kuntz in a rather off -hand manner in a meeting to discuss issues with the school site in late November. At that time we indicated that we were opposed to the idea because of the size of the park and the attendant impacts on our development and the difficulty of redesigning the plat to accommodate such a request. Since that time we have seen nothing until today in the form of a formal request. Now that we have said U:\Ds1\Cedar Spring5\2-15 response.DOC 1rJ , UCity of Meridian February 15, 2001 Page 4 Engineers Surveyors Planners request we can respond in a reasonable manner, and we still believe that this is a bad idea for all involved. Because of the lack of notice on this issue we do not have time to respond in writing to bullet points noted as favoring the single loaded road concept in the memo. We will address each point in turn at the public hearing but our opposition can be summed up in two clear points, to wit: • A single loaded road will invite additional vehicle traffic into the development and will increase impacts on surrounding properties. One glance at the master plan shows that the closest location to the baseball diamonds and soccer fields clearly shows that the closest parking spot to those facilities would be a road on the north boundary. Untold cars will be enticed into the development to look for parking as near to the field as possible. If you think you will have complaints from neighbors, just wait until you turn their street into a de facto parking lot. ■ A single loaded road is a fine concept and works extremely well to accomplish the goals listed in the memo for a neighborhood park up to about ten acres in size. However, this is a regional park, almost sixty acres in size, meant to serve a good portion of the city. The impacts of a park this size reach far beyond those of a neighborhood park and invite much more in the way of adverse impacts on surrounding properties. We are not opposed to working with the Parks Department and have done so to facilitate the location of utilities and irrigation facilities. However, this concept makes no sense at this location and we ask that you approve the plat a presented. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Daren S. Fluke, AICP Planning Associate DSF: the lJ:\Dst\Cedar Springs\2-I5 response.DOC Jwk 0 i Daren Fluke From: Gary Lee Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 7:38 AM To: Daren Fluke; Matt Schultz Subject: Cedar Springs Conditions of Approval - ACHD response Daren & Matt, Please forward this e-mail and clarification to the City Staff G. -----Original Message ----- From: Christy Richardson[mai Ito: Crichardson@achd.ada.id.usl Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:13 AM To: GALCaNUB.com Subject: Re: Cedar Springs Conditions of Approval I will fix the report to clarify, but your assumptions are correct: up to the school Venable Lane should be a 40 -foot street section. To the north of the non-residential uses it can be a 36 -foot section. Gary Lee <GALaJUB.com> 02/12/01 03:27PM >>> Christy: I would like to get a clarification on Site Specific Condition 7 and 15. No. 7 asks for'/ of a 36 foot street + 12' of pavement for Venable Lane. Condition 15 asks for 1/2 of 40 foot street + 12' of pavement. I have assumed that Condition 15 applies to that portion of Venable Lane from Ustick to the north property line of the school site & Condition 7 applies for everything north of that. Am I correct? Gary A. Lee, P.E.,L.S. J -U -B Engineers, Inc. 208-376-7330 Gary Lee From: Gary Lee sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 2:58 PM o: 'dfluke(a langstonwilliams.com' Subject: Meridian - Howell site Contacts: Darren Fluke, AICP Daren Just spoke to Tom Kuntz, Meridian Parks Dept The City has hired a firm in Seattle to prepare a park master plan that will consiste of : 4 little league diamonds, 4 soccer fields, open park area and a meandering pathway around the entire perimeter of the site. The plan will be available in about 30 days. He will call us when he has it available. The pedestrian pathway will be set back about 25 to 50 feet from the property lines of the park. The property line will be fenced. Two vehicular entrances and parking lots will be off of Ustick and Meridian Road. No entrances required or desired along our common boundary. He said that he would welcome ped. pathway connections along the north and west boundary of the park site. However, no stub streets or vehicle access. Ped. access are welcome, maybe 3 or 4 points would be good - but no more than 6. Any questions, please call me. Thanks, Gary Lee JUB Engineers. C 0 00 Phone Log Job #11644 V1`� Date: July 13, 2000 •0 With: Tom Kuntz, Director - Meridian Parks and Recreation Department 888-3579 RE: Howell Meridian Site — City Park Coordination Overview: I sent a fax of a preliminary layout for the Howell Meridian site indicating general lot layout with future park access points labeled. He contacted me saying the west and north access points seemed to coordinate very well with his master plan (which I haven't seen yet). He expressed some concern with the proximity of the northeast access point to the proposed ball diamond. In addition, he would like the height of the fences along the access ways to be less than 6 feet. I agreed with him that a "tunnel" effect is created, however maybe making the pathway a little wider would alleviate the concern. He seemed to seem o.k. with everything in general. Followup: I called him back and asked for a digital version of the master plan and gave him my e- mail address so we could incorporate the park plan into our submittal. ti J � � J u `/ ROBERT D. CORRIE CITY OF MERIDJAN Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS ORKS AND RECREATION DEPA ENT RON ANDERSON TOM KUNTZ 11 W. Bower St. • Meridian. 16 836=12 KEITH BIRD Parks & Recreation Director Phone (208) 888-3579 • Fax (208) 898-5501 TAMMY DeWEERD CHERIE McCANDLESS j?BCErVE]D F r B 15 2001 MEMORANDUM CITY OF MERIDIAN To: Planning and Zoning Commission, Mayor Corrie and City Council From: Parks and Recreation Commission and Staff Date: 02-14-01 CC.: Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, and Bill Nichols Re: Requiring a single loaded street on the southern boundary of Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction The Meridian Parks and Recreation Commission and Parks Staff would like to submit the following comments into the record for Planning and Zoning Commissions consideration in regards to the Cedar Springs Subdivision request for annexation. zoning and preliminary plat. We want to address the single loaded street issue as it relates to Cedar Springs Subdivision and our new 58 -acre park which are contiguous to each other. We have discussed and researched this issue. since it pertains to this park and our new park development standards. Staff and Commission consider it essential that a single loaded street (no yards backing up to the park) be required on the southern boundary of the Cedar Springs subdivision. A single loaded street is vital for a variety of reasons. as listed below. This issue affects the community's use of this park and the development of future parks of this size. The concept of the single loaded street was addressed with the developer and their representative at two pre -development meetings (July 18 and November 16;2000). The developer chose to ignore the request due to potential loss of building lots. Single loaded streets along the park boundary provide the following benefits: • Park appears more inviting to the public due to unobstructed access. • Create a buffer zone between the park and future homeowners. 0 0 • Helps to eliminate potential complaints or conflicts from homeowners related to: a. Privacy b. Trespassing c. Vandalism d. Light encroachment from sports fields e. Noise pollution f. Damage to homes due to park use g. Injury to home owners from baseballs and soccer balls • Handicapped parking spaces can be provided next to the park athletic field area. • Eliminates fencing and privacy landscaping costs for the developer or homeowner. • Eliminates costs to the developer of pedestrian access pathways between homes. • Eliminates hidden areas created by solid fences. • Provides higher visibility for police (see attached memo dated 2-14-01 from Chief William Gordon). • Provides better access for emergency vehicles to the northern portion of the park, which is predominantly athletic fields (see attached memo dated 2-15-01 from Meridian Fire Department). The City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department is willing to pay for the costs of curb, gutter and sidewalk and, as per ACHD's requirements, 4 feet of the street adjacent to our property. If a wider street were required to allow for parallel parking, we would consider sharing those additional costs. To minimize the possibility of park patrons parking in front of homeowner's property, we are also willing to re -design our park plan to include a parking lot in the north-east corner of the 58 acre site. We are currently trying to select a site for a new skate park, visibility and safety are key issues to City Council and Mayor in selecting and planning park sites as is also evident in the attached memos from the Meridian Police and Fire Departments. This is the first park of this size to ever be developed in Meridian. The single loaded street is a vital component of this park. Please help us plan Meridian's future by requiring a single loaded street in the Cedar Springs Subdivision. 00"k MERPHAN II)EPARTMENT W. L. "BILL" GORDON PHONE: (208) 888-6678 00 Chief of Police FAX: (208) 884-5077 TO: Mayor Robert Corrie 2/14/01 FROM: Chief William Gordon REFERENCE: Parks and Public Safety After reading a memo from Tom Kuntz and Elroy Huff, I revisited the preliminary plans for a proposed subdivision north of Ustick Rd. at Meridian Rd. that borders our newest park. All city parks should provide for access by emergency vehicles and personal to as much of the park as possible. Parks generate problems mainly because they do what they are designed to do (attract people). Any place that attracts people also needs extra services (police, fire and ambulance). The need for emergency services is a 24 hour a day need that must be considered at the beginning of any park design. All parks should have roads capable of handling a variety of emergency vehicles to prevent crimes, provide emergency services, and promote use by kids and families. Parks do require extra services and the layout of all parks or recreation areas should not cause safety problems by restricting visibility and easy access by all. Parks need to have roads surrounding them and when they reach a certain size, they should have roads through them. The current plan also needs to address the school site on the west end, it to posses some of the same concerns. If you should have any questions please feel free to contact me at your convenience. 201 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 0 Memo To: Mayor Come, City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission From: Chief Ken W. Bowers, Meridian Fire Department Date: 02-15-01 . Re: Cedar Springs Subdivision In the interest of providing emergency services to the 58 -acre park site next to Cedar Springs Subdivision, we would like to request that consideration be given to providing a street between public and private property. This would ensure access to all portions of the park, without having to transverse large portions of unoccupied surfaces. Our experience in providing emergency services in similar situations require that ambulance gumeys be wheeled over 600 feet unimproved surface. The result is that the patient care can be delayed when we have to access patients in remote portions of the park. We would be glad to work with the design team to improve emergency access to the park. s 0 Page 1 MEMORANDUM: To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner "�C_ P+z n -,c+ , R. g Febru a ry 151 Z60 I Htm tso. 9 February 14, 2001 Re: CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION (REVISED) - Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-4 for Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction (File #AZ -00- 019) - Request for Preliminary Plat of 99.83 Acres for 295 Lots by Kevin Howell Construction for a Residential Subdivision in a Proposed R-4 Zone (File #PP -00- 018) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY/BACKGROUND This Staff report is a revision to the 10-06-00 Staff memo regarding the subject applications. It provides a more detailed analysis of the preliminary plat and recommends site specific conditions for both the preliminary plat and annexation applications. Since the 10-06-00 Staff report, the Applicant has made significant modifications to the original plat, including: a. Reducing the total number of building lots from 333 to 268 b. Decreasing the gross density from 3.34 du/acre to 2.68 du/acre C. Adding a 12 -acre elementary school site to the plat d. Adding two office/non-residential use lots to the plat e. Increasing the amount of open space from 5.82 acres to 6.21 acres f. Adding two micropathways Given the scope of the modifications, the preliminary plat application was re -circulated to all agencies and City departments and revised comments were received. In particular, ACHD submitted a revised draft report in which they modified their requirements based on the future school and potential office sites. The external boundaries of the subdivision as originally proposed have not changed. No changes were made to the Annexation application, although Staff did revise the Annexation staff report. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR ` A Good Place to Live , Robert D. Come CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MF.MBF:ItS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Tarn w deWeerd (208) 888-4433 - FAX (208) 887-4813 Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 MEMORANDUM: To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner "�C_ P+z n -,c+ , R. g Febru a ry 151 Z60 I Htm tso. 9 February 14, 2001 Re: CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION (REVISED) - Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-4 for Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction (File #AZ -00- 019) - Request for Preliminary Plat of 99.83 Acres for 295 Lots by Kevin Howell Construction for a Residential Subdivision in a Proposed R-4 Zone (File #PP -00- 018) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY/BACKGROUND This Staff report is a revision to the 10-06-00 Staff memo regarding the subject applications. It provides a more detailed analysis of the preliminary plat and recommends site specific conditions for both the preliminary plat and annexation applications. Since the 10-06-00 Staff report, the Applicant has made significant modifications to the original plat, including: a. Reducing the total number of building lots from 333 to 268 b. Decreasing the gross density from 3.34 du/acre to 2.68 du/acre C. Adding a 12 -acre elementary school site to the plat d. Adding two office/non-residential use lots to the plat e. Increasing the amount of open space from 5.82 acres to 6.21 acres f. Adding two micropathways Given the scope of the modifications, the preliminary plat application was re -circulated to all agencies and City departments and revised comments were received. In particular, ACHD submitted a revised draft report in which they modified their requirements based on the future school and potential office sites. The external boundaries of the subdivision as originally proposed have not changed. No changes were made to the Annexation application, although Staff did revise the Annexation staff report. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z� February 14, 2001 Page 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING GENERAL COMMENTS A detailed analysis of the annexation application was provided in Staffs 10-9-00 report. Daren Fluke of J -U -B Engineers, the Applicant's representative, responded in detail to our analysis in a 10-26-00 letter. Our original recommendation was denial of the annexation request due primarily to three issues: • the lack of school facilities • the lack of housing diversity (lot sizes, housing types) • the lack of sanitary sewer services to the site The revised plat addresses the first two issues. A future elementary school site (Lot 4, Block 1) and a potential multi -family housing site (Lot 2, Block 1) have been added to the plat. Staff strongly supports these modifications. As cited in the original Staff report, Comprehensive Plan Policy #1.19 (Housing Chapter) states that high density housing should be located near parks. We would not support a commercial/retail use on this lot given its close proximity to the future elementary school and the increased traffic that most commercial/retail uses generate. An office use may be appropriate. However, for marketing purposes, the Applicant should be aware that three (3) future office lots in Primeland Subdivision were preliminarily approved on the north side of Ustick just one (1) mile west as well as a potential four -lot office complex at the NE corner of Ustick and Meridian in the proposed Sundance Subdivision. Also, W.H. Moore Company has submitted a letter as part of the current Comprehensive Plan amendment process regarding their intention to construct a large office complex at the NW corner of Ustick and Eagle Road. Should these three (3) office projects receive City approval (Primeland, Sundance and Moore), the office saturation point on Ustick should be considered. Staff feels the multi- family residential use would be the most compatible with the school and park sites. If designed and incorporated into the site well, a low -traffic generating, restricted hours, neighborhood - oriented retail use may also be appropriate on Ustick. The third reason for recommending denial of the annexation related to the White Drain Trunk and the uncertainty of the extension of this line from Ten Mile Road to the west. This remains a significant issue and the City is still in the process of securing all the necessary sanitary sewer easements for the trunk. However, the City has received and formally accepted the Bridgetower Crossing Subdivision applications through which the White Drain would extend. The application is slated for the March 15 meeting of the P&Z Commission. In his 10/31/00 memo to Gary Smith, Gary Lee of J -U -B Engineers stated that Mr. Howell is willing to take the risk to proceed with the preliminary plat approval process and Phase 1 final plat approval on the expectation that the White Drain Trunk will be extended to this site. Mr. Lee recommended including a condition in the Development Agreement that would not allow any construction of the subdivision to proceed until there is more certainty on the White Drain Trunk's construction schedule. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Sprringslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z • February 14, 2001 Page 3 ANNEXATION SITE SPECIFIC REQUIRMENTS Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City as a condition of annexation. 2. A condition of the Annexation/Development Agreement shall be that the Applicant provide a minimum of five percent (5%) common open space within the legal description boundaries. This requirement was adopted as part of the new Landscape Ordinance. But since the subject applications were submitted prior to City Council adoption of the Landscape Ordinance, they are technically exempt from the standards in that ordinance. However, if deemed to be in its best interest, the City can impose higher standards than are currently adopted as ordinance as conditions of annexation for any development requesting annexation into the City. The open space shall be exclusive of all street rights-of-way and street buffers, except for right-of-way specifically dedicated for landscaping within a subdivision. Stormwater detention facilities must be designed in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Landscape Ordinance in order to count toward the open space requirement. Open space may be active or passive in its intended use, and must be accessible by all residents of the subdivision. Common open space shall be suitably improved for its intended use. At a minimum, common open space lots shall include one (1) deciduous shade tree per eight thousand (8,000) square feet and lawn, either seed or sod. The Preliminary Plat's "Site Data" calculations show that 6.2% of the subdivision's gross acreage is open space. The Applicant should review the above criteria for what is allowable open space and confirm that the minimum 5% requirement is still met and that the stormwater facilities will be designed to the standards of Section 11.2 of the Landscape Ordinance. Be prepared to address this at the P&Z Commission hearing. It is unclear to Staff if the 6.2% includes or excludes the Meridian and Ustick Road street buffers and the three (3), 25 -foot Settlers Irrigation common lots along the north property line. The 20 -foot landscape buffers along Ashton Drive and Ashby Drive at the Meridian Road entrance points, the landscape medians, and the common lot ped paths can count toward the 5% minimum. 3. Due to the single-family uses abutting the east boundary of Lot 34, Block 1 (proposed as future office use), a minimum 20 -foot planting strip, in accordance with City Ordinance 12- 4-7.A., is required along the west property line of this lot and shall be a condition attached to this property in the Development Agreement. 4. The Applicant has noted that Lots 2 and 34, Block 1, are intended as future office, commercial or multi -family lots. However, the current Comprehensive Plan does not support office, commercial or high density zoning. These lots may be annexed with an R-4 zone but shall be restricted from obtaining any building permits until these two lots are formally rezoned to the L -O or other zone which allows the future proposed uses. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z February 14, 2001 Page 4 5. A detached sidewalk with a minimum 5 -foot -wide planter strip between the curb and sidewalk shall be required along the Meridian Road frontage. 6. A condition in the Development Agreement shall be that no subdivision infrastructure improvements can begin until the White Drain Sewer Trunk's easements are finalized by the City and the trunk construction schedule is finalized with the civil contractor that is awarded the bid. ANNEXATION & ZONING - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 4. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas in the proposed future commercial lots. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on- site. 6. Off-street parking shall be provided in the proposed future commercial lots in accordance with the City of Meridian Ordinance 11-13 for use of property. 7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z February 14, 2001 Page 5 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development will have to be provided by the future White Trunk Sewer. The Trunk alignment/construction is totally dependent on whether or not the subdivision layout of the future Bridgetower Subdivision on the east side of Ten Mile, north of Ustick, is satisfactory to the City, ACHD, the irrigation district and other agencies, and that the appropriate easements can be obtained. If this future phase of Bridgetower is approved (which will be reviewed at the 3-15-01 P&Z Commission hearing), the Public Works Department would proceed with surveying and easements procurement along the proposed route. Approximately 3 to 4 months of design time, followed by 6 or so months of construction is expected. The Public Works Department anticipates the trunk being completed by the end of 2001, assuming a relatively smooth approval process. This proposed development can not be provided sanitary sewer service by gravity into any other existing city sewer system. When sewer is available, applicant will be responsible to construct sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2. Water service to this development shall be via extensions from the existing main in Ustick Road adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to construct water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. 3. Underground pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Due to the size of the landscaped areas, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. The preliminary plat map does not indicate the irrigation source or proposed service or pump locations. Applicant must submit a revised plat prior to the City Council hearing showing service locations and source for the irrigation water. The irrigation pump station for the subdivision must be located on a common lot, designated as such on the plat.. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 4. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa &Meridian Irrigation District. Applicant should clarify this in writing prior to the public hearing. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process, and a draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.Pp Mayor, Council and P&Z February 14, 2001 Page 6 O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. 5. To date, Settlers Irrigation District has not submitted a response to the preliminary plat transmittal. The plat shows what appears to be a 25 -foot wide irrigation easement along the north property line. However, there are no easement delineations or notes explaining this area. Applicant should clarify at the hearing their intentions for these three common lots, the Settlers Irrigation District conditions for use of this facility, and how fencing along the easement will be handled. 6. ACHD's Site Specific Requirements #7 and #15 on page 7 of their revised report require conflicting street section widths for N. Venable Lane. One requires a 36 -foot section and the other requires a 40 -foot section. Applicant should clarify for the record. 7. ACHD's Site Specific Requirement #10 (pg. 7) classifies Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing. The street is required to provide 64 -feet of right-of-way to Greenwich. However, the revised preliminary plat only shows the 64 -foot width to N. Byron Place and then reduces to a 58 -foot right-of-way until Ashby Drive. Applicant should clarify ACHD's condition for the record. If the collector status is required to Greenwich and front -on housing is restricted, 13 lots will not meet the minimum 80 -foot frontage requirement on the connecting local streets. These lots include: Lots 1 and 7, Block 11, Lot 1, Block 12, Lots 1, 18 and 19, Block 6, Lots 16 and 17, Block 14, Lot 17, Block 16, and Lots 6-9, Block 5. The Applicant must be prepared to address ACHD's requirement and how these 13 lots will comply with the minimum frontage if they can't front on Ashton Drive. 8. The micropath at the NW corner of the future park must be relocated to the west so it serves the future school site instead of the park. The park master plan does not accommodate a pedestrian access into the park at this location. 9. Staff recommends that an additional micropath be provided at the west end of Block 17, possibly between Lots 7/8 and Lots 24/25, in order to improve pedestrian accessibility from the NW portion of the subdivision to the school and park sites. 10. Staff have some concern about how children residing on the south side of Ustick Road will access the school site at the Venable Lane intersection. While there is currently limited residential in this area, the Comp Plan designates the entire south side of Ustick as single family residential. ACHD is requiring a center turn lane at this intersection but not a signal or crosswalk to facilitate a safe pedestrian crossing. The Applicant and Commission should address this concern at the public hearing. 11. During two different pre -application meetings held with the Applicant and his representatives in July and August, 2000, Staff presented the possibility of designing W. Ashby Drive as a single -loaded street. One concept discussed was townhomes or other higher density housing that would front on the north side of Ashby and the south side would remain open for greater accessibility into the park site. Due to the significant cost AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z0 February 14, 2001 Page 7 of re -design, the Applicant was not amenable to the concept. Subsequently, Tom Kuntz of the Parks Department has also presented the concept to the Applicant's representative. In his 1-29-01 letter to Mr. Kuntz, Matthew Schultz of J -U -B Engineers stated that he felt the design as submitted has many merits and "does not warrant revision. The addition of a single -loaded street along the north boundary (of the park) will require a wholesale revision of the 100 -acre preliminary plat layout." The Parks & Recreation Commission are strongly in favor of having the park accessible from Ashby Drive. Representatives from the P&R Commission intend to testify at the P&Z Commission hearing on this matter. 12. Three (3) copies of a detailed landscape plan for the street buffers, open space common lots and the Lot 34, Block 1 land use buffer, including a detailed fencing plan, shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the final plat application. The plan must include sizes and species of trees, shrubs, berming/swale details, and all proposed ground cover/treatment. A mix of tree species is required per Ordinance 12-13. No fencing will be permitted within the required landscape buffers. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to City signature on the Final Plat. All required landscaping shall be constructed prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy for the future buildings. All perimeter fencing shall be installed prior to applying for building permits. 13. The Meridian Road and Ustick Road landscape buffers shall be a minimum of 35 feet and 25 feet in width respectively, constructed beyond the required ACHD right-of-way and constructed by the developer as a condition of the plat. The landscape buffers shall be placed in common separate lots as shown. Fencing is not to encroach upon these buffers. 14. Six -foot -high, solid, perimeter fencing shall be required along the full northern and western boundaries of the subdivision, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Director. Fencing adjacent to the future City park should be determined in coordination with the Parks & Recreation Department. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. A letter of credit or cash will be required for these fences prior to signature on the final plat. 15. Notes #3 and #8 refer to "Amherst" Subdivision. Correct to read "Cedar Springs." 16. If possible, please reply in writing to these comments by 12:00 noon on Wednesday, 2- 14-01. Submit ten copies of the revised Preliminary Plat Map to the City Clerk's Office within ten days after the P&Z Commission public hearing. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z February 14, 2001 Page 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names with the final plat application. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance 12-5-2.K. 4. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 5. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance No. 12-4-13, except as provided for under site specific requirements. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 6. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 7. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all common landscape areas on the site. 8. Two -hundred -fifty watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 9. Indicate on the final plat map any FEMA Flood Plains affecting the area being platted, and detail plans for reducing or eliminating the boundary. 10. Assessment fees for water and sewer service will be determined during the building plan review process. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springslaz.pp CHD Ada County Highway District Judy Peavey -Derr, President 318 East 37th Street Uave nivens, ist vice rresioent Garden City ID 83714-6499 Sherry R. Huber, 2nd Vice President Phone (208) 387-6100 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner FAX (208) 387-6391 David E. Wynkoop, Commissioner E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us February 8, 2001 TO: Kevin Howell Development 1087 W River St. #250 Boise, ID 83702 FROM: Christy Richardson, Principal Development Analyst Planning & Development C _ SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Cedar Springs RECEIVED FEB 12 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Meridian Road & Ustick On February 7, 2001, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District') took action on the preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho registered professional Engineer. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. C. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute a Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of the construction of all required street improvements. 3. Furnish a copy of the Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority to ether with the payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs. • • 4. If Public Right -of -Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make the deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings together with the plat and plan review fees for District acceptance and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner and the Land Surveyor's certification. 7. All of the material must be submitted to District staff two -weeks prior to Commission review of the final plat. 8. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. The Commission will consider an extension of one year if requested within 15 -days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at (208) 387-6170, should you have any questions. Cc: Planning & Development Chron/File Planning & Development Services -City of Meridian Construction Services — John Edney Drainage- Chuck Rinaldi Mathew Schiltz J -U -B Engineers 250 S Beechwood Ave. Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709 • • ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat — Cedar Springs n/w/c Meridian Road/Ustick Road Modification MAZ-00-019/MPP-00-018 REVISED The application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Cedar Springs is a 268 -lot residential subdivision on 99.8 -acres. The site also includes one office lot and one elementary school site, and one possible multi -family or office/commercial site. The applicant is also requesting annexation into the City of Meridian and a rezone from RUT to R-4. The site is located generally north of Ustick Road on the west side of Meridian Road. This development is estimated to generate 4,168 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. On October 25, 2000, the ACHD Commission reviewed and approved Cedar Springs Subdivision, a 333 -lot residential subdivision. The applicant has modified the site plan. The new plan has fewer residential lots, the addition of office/commercial lots, and a school site. Changes to this report have been made in bold. Roads impacted by this development: Meridian Road Ustick Road ACHD Commission Date — February 7, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. .cmm 'age 1 m 1 wu-vcra. us1 ».e .ons ona ao. OWG 'AINrW vav WaM3w NOLLOfM1SN00 TSM.Om HAm1 AdMkHOISIAM 9 ? GGa 1. i a�nr NOIsmaens w N301S3H MNIHdS Hd030 1dldAMYNIWI13Hd r s�� =�� •, 9 81 #; 3 I �i ii 1 fJ g .i., ,vni: .1�..t . �a : .li a1 pit d I , s s � 1 iii � � • SL-3.Cl.FSGQrt– ---- – — – —– M o —or— - — - — - — -–�� b a as '� ooi �,cc,�caa • .1 a P ILl 5I' ------------- ;---- =-7— i a I� III I� I, III I� I� II I, I� I I 1 W. USTICK ROAD r W.ASHBYSTREET o i r7l 1 (FUTURE CITY PARK) N L ------ ------ ----- pKNGILSIy &WXOKa p CEDAR SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FIGURE 1 Q O ff Z Q w 2 VA rJ •B ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS 0 Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — Leslie Family Trust/Moore Family Trust Applicant — J.U.B. RUT - Existing zoning R-4 - Requested zoning 99.8 - Acres • 268 - Proposed residential building lots 1 - Proposed office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) 1 - Proposed office/multi-family lot/commercial (Ustick Road) 1 - Proposed elementary school lot 2,566 — vehicle trips per day for single family lots 474 — vehicle trips per day for office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) 418 — vehicle trips per day for office/multi-family lot (Ustick Road) 710 — vehicle trips per day for elementary school site 4,168 — total vehicle trips per day North Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District 255 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Meridian Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 4,156 on 8-2-00 Better than C -Existing Level of Service Better than C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 1,530 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Meridian Road is improved with two traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Ustick Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 3,960 on 8-2-00 Better than C — Existing Level of Service Better than C — Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 460 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Cedar Sprijigs. rev. cmm Page 2 0 9 Ustick Road is improved with two traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. B. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. C. The applicant submitted a revised traffic study for this development. The results of the traffic study, and the key findings include: • The proposed project is a 268 -lot single family subdivision located near the Ustick Road and Meridian Road intersection. The revised plan also has one office/commercial lot off Meridian Road, one office or multi -family lot (approximately 63 units) off Ustick Road, and an elementary school site. • The estimated build -out year for the subdivision is 2005. • The trip generation is 4,168 vehicle trips per day, or 420 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. • The subdivision proposes one approach to Ustick Road, located west of Meridian Road, and two approaches on Meridian Road, both located north of Ustick Road. • All three proposed approaches have two outbound lanes: a left -turn lane and a right -turn lane. The left -turn movements will operate at LOS A for the three approaches. • The construction of left -turn bays on Ustick Road and Meridian Road for the three proposed subdivision approaches. • There are four stub streets proposed, three to the north and one to the west. • The ADT on Ustick Road is 3,960 vehicles per day and 4,156 vehicles per day on Meridian Road, counts taken on August 2, 2000. • The Ustick/Meridian Road all -way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS B. • With the estimated "background" traffic in year 2005, the Ustick/Meridian Road all -way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS C. • With the estimated "site" plus "background" traffic in the year 2005, the Ustick/Meridian Road all -way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS E. • The study predicts that the Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant will be met for a traffic signal at the Ustick/Meridian Road intersection when the proposed development reaches full build -out. • One internal street, Ashton Lane from Ashby Street to Meridian Road, is estimated to exceed 1,000 vehicles per day and is being designed as a collector street. D. Any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road should be located outside of the new right-of-way. E. The applicant is proposing two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270 -feet north of the south property line, and 300 -feet south of the north property line. The proposed entrances are separated by over 800 -feet and are located in conformance with District policy. The roadway entrances should be designed with minimum 21 -foot street sections on either side of a center median. The median should be constructed a minimum of 4 -feet wide to total a minimum of a Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 1 • 0 100 -square foot area. The applicant is proposing to constrict two outbound lanes and one inbound lane with a median, within 64 -feet of right-of-way. F. The applicant should be required to construct center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. G. The applicant should be required to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. H. The applicant is proposing one main entrance on Ustick Road located at the west property line. The proposed entrance is located in conformance with District policy, and the applicant should construct Venable Lane as one half of a 36 -foot street section, plus 12 -feet of additional pavement within 42 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant is not proposing to construct a median at this entrance. I. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. J. The applicant should be required to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. K. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing, because the anticipated traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. The access restrictions for this street segment should be stated on the final plat. The applicant is proposing to construct a 40 - foot street section within 58 -feet of right-of-way, the standard street section for a 3 -lane industrial/commercial street. District policy requires that this street segment be constructed as 46 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 64 -feet of right-of-way. Parking should be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. L. The applicant is proposing to construct three stub streets to the north. The applicant should not be required to provide paved temporary turnarounds at the end of the stub streets because the stubs are less than 100 -feet in length. The applicant should be required to install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. The proposed stub streets are located: • Between Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 Cedar Springs.rev.m n Page 4 M. The applicant is proposing to construct Ashton Lane to the west property line. The applicant should not be required to provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the street because the stub is less than 100 -feet in length. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. N. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial lot on Meridian Road at the southwest corner of the intersection with the proposed southerly main entrance. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Meridian Road. One driveway is proposed off Ashby Drive. The driveway should be located a minimum of 100 -feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. O. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial or multi -family lot on Ustick Road at the northeast corner of the intersection with the proposed main entrance to the subdivision. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Ustick Road. Driveways should be located a minimum of 100 -feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30 - feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. P. The applicant's site plan indicates a proposed elementary school on Venable Lane located north of Ustick Road. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. Q. Due to the volumes and types of vehicular uses on Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the school site, Venable Lane should be constructed as a local/commercial street. The applicant should construct Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way. R. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. S. The applicant should be required to construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36 -foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50 -feet of right-of- way. T. The public streets within the subdivision should be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- feet(centerlme to centerline). It appears that the street layout is in conformance with District policy. U. The turnarounds should be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. V. The applicant's traffic study indicates that frill build -out of the subdivision should occur by 2005, and that traffic at the Ustick Road/Meridian Road intersection will warrant a signal by the year Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Pa -e 5 2005. A traffic signal will cost approximately $120,000. The southwest corner and the southeast corner have been developed. The northeast corner is vacant land, and staff has received a traffic study for a 215 -lot residential subdivision with four office lots on corner. Full build -out of that subdivision is expected by 2005. Staff recommends that this applicant contribute one-quarter of the cost of a traffic signal, $30,000 to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund. The District will also require the same deposit from the developer at the northeast corner. W. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this report. Special Recommendation to the City of Meridian: 1. The City should require the applicant to provide pathways to the City Park site so that pedestrians to not have to access collector roadways for access into the park. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Site Specific Requirements: Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. Locate any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road outside of the new right-of-way. Cedar Springs. rev .cmm Page 6 0 • 4. The two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270 -feet north of the south property line, and 300 -feet south of the north property line, are approved with this application. The entrances shall be designed with two outbound lanes and one inbound lane on either side of a center median, within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4 -feet wide to total a minimum of a 100 -square foot area. 5. Construct center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. 6. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 7. The main entrance on Ustick Road located at the west property line, is approved with this application. Construct Venable Lane as one half of a 36 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement within 42 -feet of right-of-way. 8. Construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 9. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 - feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 10. Construct the segment of Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing. The access restrictions for this street segment shall be stated on the final plat. Construct this segment of Ashton Lane as a 46 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 64 -feet of right-of- way. Parking shall be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. 11. Construct three stub streets to the north, located as proposed: • Between Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 Install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. 12. Construct Ashton Lane to the west property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 7 13. One driveway on Ashby Drive shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial lot. The drivewav shall be located a minimum of 100 -feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACRD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. 14. One driveway on Venable Lane shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial/multi-family lot. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 100 -feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. 15. Construct Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way. 16. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. 17. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. 18. Unless otherwise specified, construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36 -foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50 -feet of right-of-way. 19. The public streets within the subdivision shall be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- feet(centerline to centerline). 20. The turnarounds shall be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. 21. Provide a $30,000 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of one-quarter of a traffic signal at the intersection of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. 22. Other than the proposed public streets, direct lot or parcel access to Ustick Road and Meridian Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Cedar Springs.revxinm Pa„,e 8 Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building pen -nit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two frill business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. Cedar Springs.revxmm Page 9 • 0 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff February 7, 2001 Cedar Springs.rev.cnun Page 10 K:r • RECEIVED ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT FEB - 5 2001 Planning and Development Division CITY OF MERIDIAN Development Application Report Preliminary Plat — Cedar Springs n/w/c Meridian Road/Ustick Road Modification MAZ-00-019/MPP-00-018 REVISED The application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Cedar Springs is a 268 -lot residential subdivision on 99.8 -acres. The site also includes one office lot and one elementary school site, and one possible multi -family or office/commercial site. The applicant is also requesting annexation into the City of Meridian and a rezone from RUT to R-4. The site is located generally north of Ustick Road on the west side of Meridian Road. This development is estimated to generate 4,168 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. On October 25, 2000, the ACHD Commission reviewed and approved Cedar Springs Subdivision, a 333 -lot residential subdivision. The applicant has modified the site plan. The new plan has fewer residential lots, the addition of office/commercial lots, and a school site. Changes to this report have been made in bold. Roads impacted by this development: Meridian Road Ustick Road ACHD Commission Date — February 7, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. .cninl . age 1 'err r� U OHM AINnOO VW tmaa3n smmTamm N NOIS�11icons lVUN30IS3N SONIHdS UV03� d eti: r a a 1VldAHY'NIWIl38d r= lA `=� � • 9� tt [ D J. bill d j ! ! p jii ilir 3i� f� fry',,', i!� • + ' � ' �' ►�' f � i � � ifi � ...� 8 s � � j iii I I • -- n o ae'Lc,z �Ms:.00c ,l.C'L.KOOi e _ —__— _---- I it 00 ------------------ z� W.ASHBY STREET o i (FUTURE CITY PARK) CEDAR SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FIGURE 1 &trrovcd p D Q O ff z Q O w 2 VA r U•B ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS r i Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — Leslie Family Trust/Moore Family Trust Applicant — J.U.B. RUT - Existing zoning R-4 - Requested zoning 99.8 - Acres .: • - Proposed residential building lots - Proposed office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) - Proposed office/multi-family lot (Ustick Road) - Proposed elementary school lot 2,566 — vehicle trips per day for single family lots 474 — vehicle trips per day for office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) 418 — vehicle trips per day for office/multi-family lot (Ustick Road) 710 — vehicle trips per day for elementary school site 4,168 — total vehicle trips per day North Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District 255 - Traffic Analysis Zone JAZ) Meridian Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 4,156 on 8-2-00 Better than C -Existing Level of Service Better than C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 1,530 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Meridian Road is improved with two traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Ustick Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 3,960 on 8-2-00 Better than C — Existing Level of Service Better than C — Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 460 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Ustick Road is improved with two traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Cedar Springs.rev.cnnn Page 2 0 B. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. C. The applicant submitted a revised traffic study for this development. The results of the traffic study, and the key findings include: • The proposed project is a 268 -lot single family subdivision located near the Ustick Road and Meridian Road intersection. The revised plan also has one office/commercial lot off Meridian Road, one office or multi -family lot (approximately 63 units) off Ustick Road, and an elementary school site. • The estimated build -out year for the subdivision is 2005. • The trip generation is 4,168 vehicle trips per day, or 420 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The subdivision proposes one approach to Ustick Road, located west of Meridian Road, and -> two approaches on Meridian Road, both located north of Ustick Road. All three proposed approaches have two outbound lanes: a left -turn lane and a right -turn lane. The left -turn movements will operate at LOS A for the three approaches. • The construction of left -turn bays on Ustick Road and Meridian Road for the three proposed subdivision approaches. • There are four stub streets proposed, three to the north and one to the west. • The ADT on Ustick Road is 3,960 vehicles per day and 4,156 vehicles per day on Meridian Road, counts taken on August 2, 2000. • The Ustick/Meridian Road all -way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS B. With the estimated "background" traffic in year 2005, the Ustick/Meridian Road all -way IN stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS C. • With the estimated "site" plus "background" traffic in the year 2005, the Ustick/Meridian Road all -way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS E. • The study predicts that the Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant will be met for a traffic signal at the Ustick/Meridian Road intersection when the proposed development reaches full build -out. • One internal street, Ashton Lane from Ashby Street to Meridian Road, is estimated to exceed 1,000 vehicles per day and is being designed as a collector street. D. Any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road should be :t located outside of the new right-of-way. E. The applicant is proposing two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270 -feet north of the south property line, and 300 -feet south of the north property line. The proposed entrances are separated by over 800 -feet and are located in conformance with District policy. The roadway entrances should be designed with minimum 21 -foot street sections on either side of a center median. The median should be constructed a minimum of 4 -feet wide to total a minimum of a 100 -square foot area. The applicant is proposing to construct two outbound lanes and one inbound lane with a median, within 64 -feet of right-of-way. F. The applicant should be required to construct center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 3 0 0 G. The applicant should be required to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. H. The applicant is proposing one main entrance on Ustick Road located at the west property line. The proposed entrance is located in conformance with District policy, and the applicant should construct Venable Lane as one half of a 36 -foot street section, plus 12 -feet of additional pavement within 42 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant is not proposing to construct a median at this entrance. I. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the �. design of the turn lane with District staff. 'new J. The applicant should be required to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. K. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing, because the anticipated traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. The access restrictions for. this street segment should be stated on the final plat. The applicant is proposing to construct a 40 - foot street section within 58 -feet of right-of-way, the standard street section for a 3 -lane industrial/commercial street. District policy requires that this street segment be constructed as 46 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 64 -feet of right-of-way. Parking should be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. L. The applicant is proposing to construct three stub streets to the north. The applicant should not be required to provide paved temporary turnarounds at the end of the stub streets because the stubs are less than 100 -feet in length. The applicant should be required to install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. The proposed stub streets are located: • Between Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 M. The applicant is proposing to construct Ashton Lane to the west property line. The applicant should not be required to provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the street because the stub is less than 100 -feet in length. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. N. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial lot on Meridian Road at the southwest corner of the intersection with the proposed southerly main entrance. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Meridian Road. One driveway is proposed Cedar Springs.rev.cnim Page 4 off Ashby Drive. The driveway should be located a minimum of 100 -feet west of Meridian .y Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. O. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial or multi -family lot on Ustick Road at the northeast corner of the intersection with the proposed main entrance to the subdivision. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Ustick Road. Driveways should be located a minimum of 100 -feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30 - feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. P. The applicant's site plan indicates a proposed elementary school on Venable Lane located north of Ustick Road. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. Q. Due to the volumes and types of vehicular uses on Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the school site, Venable Lane should be constructed as a local/commercial street. The applicant should construct Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way. R. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. S. The applicant should be required to construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36 -foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50 -feet of right-of- way. T. The public streets within the subdivision should be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- r feet(centerline to centerline). It appears that the street layout is in conformance with District policy. U. The turnarounds should be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. ;mow. rs V. The applicant's traffic study indicates that full build -out of the subdivision should occur by 2005, p�Y.�M: and that traffic at the Ustick Road/Meridian Road intersection will warrant a signal by the year 2005. A traffic signal will cost approximately $120,000. The southwest corner and the southeast corner have been developed. The northeast corner is vacant land, and staff has received a traffic study for a 215 -lot residential subdivision with four office lots on corner. Full build -out of that subdivision is expected by 2005. Staff recommends that this applicant contribute one-quarter of _.. the cost of a traffic signal, $30,000 to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund. The District will also require the same deposit from the developer at the northeast comer. W. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates k` that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by -- this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this report. Cedar Springs.rev.cnim Page 5 rr �r w ; Special Recommendation to the City of Meridian: The City should require the applicant to provide pathways to the City Park site so that pedestrians to not have to access collector roadways for access into the park. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section r 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 3. Locate any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road outside of the new right-of-way. 4. The two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270 -feet north of the south property line, and 300 -feet south of the north property line, are approved with this application. The entrances shall be designed with two outbound lanes and one inbound lane on either side of a center median, within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4 -feet wide to total a minimum of a 100 -square foot area. 5. Construct center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes shall be constricted to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. 6. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. Cedar Springs.rev.cnun Page 6 0 E -i4 7. The main entrance on Ustick Road located at the west property line, is approved with this application. Construct Venable Lane as one half of a 36 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement within 42 -feet of right-of-way. 8. Construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 9. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2- :.. feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. -;. 10. Construct the segment of Ashton Lane from Meridian Road to Greenwich Avenue as a residential collector street with no front -on housing. The access restrictions for this street segment shall be stated on the final plat. Construct this segment of Ashton Lane as a 46 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 64 -feet of right-of- way. Parking shall be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. 11. Construct three stub streets to the north, located as proposed: • Between Lot 1-, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 Install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. 12. Construct Ashton Lane to the west property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". - Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. 13. One driveway on Ashby Drive shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial lot. The drivewav shall be located a minimum of 100 -feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. 14. One driveway on Venable Lane shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial/multi-family lot. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 100 -feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30 -feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. 15. Construct Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40 -foot street section plus 12 -feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42 -feet of right-of-way. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 7 0 r� 16. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. IT Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat ^" shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. 18. Unless otherwise specified, construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36 -foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50 -feet of right-of-way. 19. The public streets within the subdivision shall be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- `""°` feet(centerline to centerline). wg < 20. The turnarounds shall be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet. i 21. Provide a $30,000 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of one-quarter of a traffic signal at the intersection of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. 22. Other than the proposed public streets, direct lot or parcel access to Ustick Road and Meridian Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. r Standard Requirements: _ 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein .: shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. r a r# Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action °""' do notrovide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and p g report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those =W items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 8 0 0 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. P4„�n4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit ;Y (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. <1 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable 1%0 requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. r -r 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant r to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: 1. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff Cedar Springs.rev.cnim Page 9 ** TX CONFI0ION REPORT ** AS OF FEB 064k 11=28 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS 21 02/06 11:13 PUBLIC WORKS OF --S 03'42" 011 149 OK 22 02/06 11:18 LEGAL DEPARTMENT EC --S 05'37" 011 149 OK 23 02/06 11:24 208 888 6854 EC --S 04'04" 011 149 OK ------------------------------------------------------------------ RECEIVED ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT FEB - 5 2001 Planning and Development Division CITY OF MERIDIAN moa Development Application Report Preliminary Plat — Cedar Springs n/w/c Meridian Road/Ustick Road Modification MAZ-00-019/MPP-00-018 REVISED The application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Cedar Springs is a 268 -lot residential subdivision on 99.8 -acres. The site also includes one office lot and ;ted one elementary school site, and one possible multi -family or office/commercial site. The applicant .ftw is also requesting annexation into the City of Meridian and a rezone from RUT to R-4. The site is located generally north of Ustick Road on the west side of Meridian Road. This development is estimated to generate 4,168 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. On October 2S, 2000, the ACHD Commission reviewed and approved Cedar Springs Subdivision, a 333 -lot residential subdivision. The applicant has modified the site plan. The new plan has fewer residential lots, the addition of office/commercial lots, and a school site. Changes to this report have been made in bold. Roads impacted by this development: Meridian Road Ustick Road ACHD Commission Date — February 7, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. Page 1 W /e.PM Z =, SITE W m -- — J' > Fri _FLAIR - Ccdar Springs.rev.cmm Page 1 0 January 16, 2001 AZ 00-019 0 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING January $, 2001 APPLICANT Kevin Howell ITEM NO. 1 REQUEST Request for annexation and zoning of 100.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedarsprings Subdivision NW of Meridian Road and Ustick Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: SANITARY SERVICE: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: COMMENTS See Previous Item Packet INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: See attached letter from applicant Phone:t Dae: //��� Contacted: �� 1`�� L Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. CJUOB January 16, 2001 Kristy Vigil Meridian City Clerks Office 200 E. Carlton, Suite 400 Meridian, ID 83642 By Fax: 887-4813 Dear Kristy: qN c ty Cle���laa i'leP RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision 0 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS -PLANNERS 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 FAX: 208/323-9336 As the representative of Kevin Howell, please consider this letter an official request for the tabling of the Cedar Springs Subdivision applications (AZ -00-019 & AZ -00-018). The applications are currently scheduled for the January 18, 2001 public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. We respectfully request that the Commission table the items to their February 1, 2001, public hearing to allow additional time to work on various issues related to the preliminary plat. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Daren S. Fluke, AICP Planning Associate DSF:Ihc cc: Brad Hawkins -Clark by email Bruce Freckleton by email Kevin Howell by email U Adsf\cedarsprings\1.16table.doc E December 8, 2000 AZ 00-019 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING December 12, 2000 APPLICANT Kevin Howell ITEM NO. 1 REQUEST Request for annexation and zoning of 100.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedar springs Subdivision NW of Meridian Road and Ustick Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS See attached Subdivision Evaluation - J-ek hlcie V. eras ,Ik M -PC CkA-+- See Attached comments -9/25/00 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See attached memo's from JUB Enainners datedl0/26/00 and 12/5/00 Contacted: jf41_f1_�� � �. Date: �` Phone: N �3� Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Will Berg From: Shari Stiles [stiless@ci.meridian. id.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:41 PM To: Steve; Brad H -C; Bruce F.; Gary; William G. Berg Jr. (E-mail); Shelby Ugarriz (E-mail) Subject: FW: Cedar Springs Annexation & Preliminary Plat ----Original Message --- From: Gary Lee [mailto:GAL@JUB.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:59 AM To: 'stiless@ci.meridian.id.us' Cc: 'smithg@ci. meridian. id. us'; Matt Schultz; 'khinvest@aol.com' Subject: Cedar Springs Annexation & Preliminary Plat Shari: This project is up for P&Z Commission meeting next Tuesday (12/12/00). We have not yet completed the site plan revisions to incorporate the school site and other mixed uses. Also, I have been waiting on a response from Gary Smith to see if the City will let us proceed with the annexation and preliminary plat in light of the fact that the White Sewer trunk is not yet constructed through Kevin's property. Kevin has willing to risk the timing on the trunk line vs. starting his project. If the construction of the trunk line does not happen within a timely manner, it would simply mean that his preliminary plat would expire, or, be subject to a time extension. We would therefore like to request that this item be tabled until the Jan. 9, 2001 planning & zoning meeting. We will make an attempt to submit the revised plan to staff for review within the next few days. Please call me to discuss, if you have concerns. Gary A. Lee, P.E.,L.S. J -U -B Engineers, Inc. 208-376-7330 �J U -Bi � October 26, 2000 Will Berg, City Clerk Planning and Zoning Commission/City Council City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 400 Meridian, ID 83642 •J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 RE: Response to Staff Report dated October 9, 2000 Cedar Springs Subdivision Members of the Commission and Council: 208-376-7330 FAX: 208-323-9336 .j'�ECEIVEj? "c. 3 0 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE We are in receipt of the staff report for Cedar Springs Subdivision and offer the following responses to the issues raised therein: ANNEXATION AND ZONING GENERAL COMMENTS A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment? While we concur with the staff analysis of the various Comprehensive Plan provisions supporting approval of Cedar Springs, we believe that the provisions allegedly supporting denial are either taken out of context or simply do not apply. In that regard we offer the following analysis of each of the provisions characterized as not supporting annexation: ❑ "School sites should be reserved for future acquisition in advance of development of planned land use. Approval of subdivision plats may be withheld if adequate school facilities or sites are not available to serve the proposed subdivision." (Schools Chapter, 3.3) We certainly agree that the availability of school capacity is an important consideration in the approval of any residential development. Unfortunately, the Meridian School District does not have a future acquisitions map nor a facility plan to help in the planning and location of both school facilities and residential developments. The developer recognizes the importance of schools and is actively working with the School District to help provide solutions to the overcrowding issues in this area. ❑ "Support a variety of residential categories ... for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." (Land Use Chapter, 2.1 U) It is not readily apparent why this particular provision supports a denial of the application. It basically states that the City's zoning ordinance should make provisions for urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, etc. to serve a population with diverse needs and housing requirements. It does not require each and every distinct development to provide multiple housing types within the development. ris C«` f'J - U City of Meridian October 26, 2000 Engineers Surveyors Planners Page 2 ❑ "Although it is recognized that urbanized development does exist within the rural areas of the Area of City Impact, the rural lands should be kept in agricultural production as long as possible until urban services (municipal sewer and water facilities and other essential services) can be provided" (Land Use Chapter, 6.3). This provision actually supports approval. This parcel is contiguous with the existing City Limits, adjoins a public park site with a recently completed master plan, has water available, and is serviceable by the White Trunk line which is currently in the planning stages for extension by the City. ❑ "All development in the USPA shall be required to connect to the municipal sewer system." (Public Services Chapter, 5.5) This is simply a matter of timing. The City of Meridian intends to build the White Trunk line and we intend to connect as soon as it is available. We are amenable to a condition of approval limiting sewer service for this project to the future White Trunk Line. ❑ "Police protection within the city limits ... should be maintained according to the recommended service ratio of 1.6 to 1.8 police officers per 1,000 persons." (Public Services Chapter, 6.8) Nothing in the public record indicates that approval of this development will cause the City to exceed the service ratio targets for police protection. In fact, the City Police Department chose not even to respond to the transmittal. Further, the additional tax revenues from this development will allow the City to hire additional officers if the City finds that necessary in the future. ❑ "Maintain a five-minute or less response time goal to all fire, police, and medical emergencies within the City." (Public Service Chapter, 6.9U) There is nothing in the public record indicating that this development will not be within a five-minute response time for fire, police, and emergency medical service providers. In fact, the City Police Department chose not to comment on the development and the City Fire Department identified no particular concerns including response time. ❑ "The City of Meridian intends to provide a wide diversity of housing types and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development." (Housing Chapter, 1.1) The City of Meridian should be commended for recognizing that healthy communities are composed of a variety of housing types. However, this provision does not mean that each and every development that is approved should include a diversity of housing types. In fact, the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance make it almost impossible to mix product types within a given development. If the City intended for a mix of residential types in this area the Comprehensive Plan would have designated the parcel as Mixed Residential rather than as Single Family Residential. No* rJ-u City of Meridian Engineers Surveyors Planners October 26, 2e 3 Page 3 ❑ "Housing proposals shall be phased with ...public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs." (Housing Chapter, 1.6) The City of Meridian is spending a large sum of money to extend the White Trunk Line to this and other parcels in the area. It is in the best interest of Meridian taxpayers to bring the line into service and encourage public extensions and connections as soon as possible. This spreads the costs over a larger population base and makes more efficient use of this expensive public service. We would like to have our approval in place and be ready to connect just as soon as the line becomes available. ❑ "Residential developments shall be phased in accordance with their connection to the municipal sewer system." (Housing Chapter, 1.7) The development, if approved, will necessarily be phased with the provision of sewer. If sewer does not become available the final plat will not be approved by either the Central District Health Department or the City of Meridian. ❑ "High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares." (Housing Chapter, 1.19) This provision has been taken out of context. It is meant to act as a guide for the location of projects including high density housing. While it is certainly desirable to have open space within or near higher densities, it does not necessarily follow that high density housing should be located adjacent to every city park. Furthermore, the Comprehensive Plan designates the parcel for single family residential - not multi -family residential. B. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area? As was discussed above, Policy 1.19 of the Housing Chapter encourages high density development next to open space where possible. It is unreasonable to infer that this policy was intended to require higher density housing next to every public park or dedicated open space within the City. As to the limited access to the park, the original design for Cedar Springs included six separate paths to the park site from our development. The layout was redesigned based upon the comments of the City's Parks Director who indicated that the recently completed park master plan did not support that many connections. Interestingly, in approving Cedar Springs on October 26, 2000, the ACHD Commission made a special recommendation to the City of Meridian to include additional pathways into the park. We would be happy to include additional paths if the City so desires. E. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services? JUB City of Meridian Engineers Surveyors Planners October 26, 2000 Page 4 Sewer Staff concerns over the ultimate alignment of the White Trunk have little or no impact on this project. Ultimately, the White Trunk will pass near or through this parcel, and is required for approval of the final plat. If the trunk is never built then the project never goes to final plat. If and when it is, the City will immediately begin to recoup the construction costs through hook-up fees from this development. We agree with the staff comment that this is basically a matter of timing. The Developer is convinced that the City will build the trunk and is willing to accept the risk that the City will not build the line within a time frame that is most convenient for the developer. Schools The developer is currently working with the Meridian School District to find a mutually agreeable solution to reduce the overcrowding problem. Roadway Capacity While we appreciate staff's opinion on this matter, we remain confident that the conclusions of the traffic study are valid and well founded. The ACHD Commission accepted the conclusions of the traffic study and approved Cedar Springs on October 25. The City should note that the Highway District is requiring a deposit of $30,000 from the developer for the future construction of a signal at the Meridian Road/Ustick Road intersection. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Nothing in the public record indicates that the service providers cannot meet the five- minute response time goal of the Comprehensive Plan and the Fire Department explicitly indicated no concerns with the development. We believe that this is not a significant issue facing the project. J. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian? We obviously believe that this development is in the best interest of the City. It is consistent with the Land Use Map of the adopted Comprehensive Plan as well as the policies applicable to r-esidentiai developments. We are unsure as to what features can be offered to complement the future park other than the planned pathway connections. It is patently unfair to saddle future homeowners in this development with monthly fees for the upkeep of private pocket parks when there is a public park next door that will be developed and maintained with their tax dollars. Finally, the City's proposed landscape has not been adopted and does not yet have the force of law. How can we be expected to comply with an ordinance that has not been adopted and will likely change any number of times before it is adopted? Of course, we will fully comply with all adopted ordinances and will make every effort to comply with the spirit and intent of the proposed ordinance as well. �a J City of Meridian Engineers Surveyors Planners October 26, 2000 Page 5 Conclusion We firmly believe that our submitted application will be a positive addition to the neighborhood and the City of Meridian. We request that the planning staff provide the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council with a full evaluation of the proposed preliminary plat. A significant amount of time, effort and money have been spent designing a project that complies with the adopted plans and ordinances of the City of Meridian, not to mention the cost and effort of preparing preliminary engineering designs and a traffic study. Basic fairness dictates that a full evaluation be provided to the decision makers. We believe that the issues raised by staff are valid and deserving of a full analysis, but we also believe that none of the issues are insurmountable or deserving of denial of the project. We are very interested in working with the staff to craft a mutually agreeable resolution for all parties. In that regard, we request a meeting with the City Engineer and Planning Director prior to the December 14 public hearing to work on the issues raised in the staff report. Please determine an acceptable time and date and we will be there. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Daren S. Fluke, AICP Planning Associate DSF: the cc: Shari Stiles/Brad Hawkins -Clark Gary Smith/Bruce Freckleton Kevin Howell U:\dsf\cedarsprings\cedarspringsresponse.doc "a • • SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET OCT 17 2000 City ©f Meridian Ofd Proposed Development Name Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision File No. PP -00-018 Date Reviewed 10/5/00 Preliminary Stage X Final Engineer/Developer J -U -B Engineers Inc/Kevin Howell Development The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Ada County Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall appear on the plat: "N. MERIDIAN ROAD" "W. USTICK ROAD" "N. VENABLE LANE" The following streets names are not approved because they are duplicates or sound alike: "W. WALLIS COURT" "N. ROSS AVENUE" "W. MONTROSE STREET" "N. MARLOWE AVENUE" "N. CHURCHILL AVENUE" "N. ADDISON AVENUE" "W. SOMERSET STREET' "N. LOCKSLEY AVENUE" The following street names are approve for this plat: "N. GREENWICH WAY" "N. PRICE AVENUE" "N. ELSINORE AVENUE" "N. BYRON PLACE" "N. BRETON PLACE" "W. ASHBY DRIVE" "W. ALEXIS DRIVE" "W. FRANDON COURT' "W. BLAKE STREET" "W. THAIN STREET' "W. ALESTER STREET" "W. ANTON STREET' "W. ASHTON DRIVE" "N. BARRON WAY" "W. STAUNTON COURT' "W. WELCH STREET" "W- CORNELL COURT' "N. RHODES AVENUE" "N. STANFORD AVENUE" and "N. PORTAGE AVENUE" Please submit five (5) more names for this plat Page 1 of 2 The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, AGEN DESIGNEES �1 Ada County Engineer John Pri Community Planning Assoc. Linda Ri City of Meridian Meridian Fire Dept. REPRESENTATIVES OR Date ALJ S Date /� 5 Cheryl Sable Date /v 1 Representative) OVv— Date /d NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat', otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index 4N 1W 36 Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS TR\SUBS\Small Cities.FRM Page 2 of 2 April 13, 2001 AZ 00-019 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 17, 2001 APPLICANT J -U -B Engineers ITEM NO. REQUEST Annexation and zoning of 100.71 acres from RUT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivisoin - north of Ustick Road and west of Meridian Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See P & Z Item Packet CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See attached Recommendations CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ti✓ / SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY n CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: 6e t GLffACkt C royy, PA^L, '' FSC d . �1 Contacted: P rnL- Taylor {{-Sr-�1G1��. Date: 4/13/01 Phone: 376-7330 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. CJUoB,A Cllr �yc�,�s?Opp ler�e�f jaa �leR January 16, 2001 Kristy Vigil Meridian City Clerks Office 200 E. Carlton, Suite 400 Meridian, ID 83642 By Fax: 887-4813 RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision Dear Kristy: J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 FAX: 208/323-9336 As the representative of Kevin Howell, please consider this letter an official request for the tabling of the Cedar Springs Subdivision applications (AZ -00-019 & AZ -00.018). The applications are currently scheduled for the January 18, 2001 public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. We respectfully request that the Commission table the items to their February 1, 2001, public hearing to allow additional time to work on various issues related to the preliminary plat. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Daren S. Fluke, AICP Planning Associate DSF:Ihc cc: Brad Hawkins -Clark by email Bruce Freckleton by email Kevin Howell by email U Adsf\cedarsprings\1.16table.doc January 10, 2001 Will Berg, City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, iD 83642 • 0 RECEIVED JAN 12 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Re: PP 00-018 Revision of Preliminary Plat for Cedar Springs Subdivision Dear Commissioners: The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no facilities within the area for the above- mentioned project. However, the District has two concerns, one being who will be operating and maintaining the pressure system and the second being, will the storm drainage be retained on site? If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT Cc: F;!e — Shop File — Office Water Superintendent APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 CENTRAL CENTRAZDISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT •N DISTRICT Return to: HEALTH Environmental Health Division ❑ Boise DEPARTMENT ❑ Eagle ❑ Garden City Rezone # Meridian Coitional Use # ❑ Kuna Preliminar / Final / Short Plat ❑ ACZ Ll Star ❑ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. RECD L)f 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. 0 1, LJ3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can cor Cori s Proal. CIL, l L,rld�8 ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ®pfice ❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics ❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other ❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. After writtep approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: / \ central sewage ❑ mmunity sewage system ❑ community water well ❑ interim sewage central water ❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: —eentral sewage LJ community sewage system ❑ community water ❑ sewage dry lines Central water 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center ❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store A, Date: �ll� /_�c/_1) rcrrr✓��/ �� Reviewed By:�1�� Review Sheet WHO 9/00 Ikc ;' CENTRAL •le DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT • 0 MAIN OFFICE - 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL • BOISE, ID 83704-0825 - (208) 375-5211 - FAX 327-85C' To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that storm water be pre-treated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, July 1997. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. Ada / Boise County Office 707 N. Armsrong PI. Boise, ID 83704 Enviro Health: 327-7499 Family Planning: 327-7400 Immunizations: 327-7450 Senior Nutrition, 327-7460 WIC: 327-7488 FAX 327-8500 Serving Valley, Eltnore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada -WIC Satellite Office 1606 Robert St. Boise, ID 83705 Ph. 334-3355 FAX: 334-3355 Elmore County Office 520 E. 8th Street N. Mountain Home,'ID 83647 Enviro. Health: 587-9225 Family Health: 587-4407 WIC: 587-4409 FAX: 587-3521 Valley County Office 703 N. 1 st Street P.O. Box 1448 McCall, ID. 83638 Ph, 634-7194 FAX: 634-2174 • December 8, 2000 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING December 12, 2000 APPLICANT Kevin Howell ITEM NO. REQUEST Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposedCedar Springs Subdivision NW of Meridian Road and Ustick Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: COMMENTS See attached Subdivision Evaluation " ?y_eVl,6a -VOA -Pkt� YfL J�V 01 See Attached comments -9/25/00 INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See attached memo's from JUB Enginners datedl0/26/00 and 12/5/00 Contacted: Date: r - " �r�;' Phone: 7(p " 7��� Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Kristy Vigil From: Shelby Ugarriza Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 7:32 AM To: Kristy Vigil Subject: FW: Cedar Springs Annexation & Preliminary Plat Kristy, this e-mail needs to be printed and copied for the Commission for Decembers Meeting. Thanks. ----Original Message From: Shari Stiles [mai Ito: stiless(g7_ci.meridian.id.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:41 PM To: Steve; Brad H -C; Bruce F.; Gary; William G. Berg Jr. (E-mail); Shelby Uganiz (E-mail) Subject: FW: Cedar Springs Annexation & Preliminary Plat --Original Message From: Gary Lee [mailto:GAL@JUB.com1 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:59 AM To: 'stHess@ci.meridianJd.us' Cc: 'smithg@ci.meridian.id.us'; Matt Schultz; 'khinvest@aol.com' Subject: Cedar Springs Annexation & Preliminary Plat Shari This project is up for P&Z Commission meeting next Tuesday (12/12/00). We have not yet completed the site plan revisions to incorporate the school site and other mixed uses. Also, I have been waiting on a response from Gary Smith to see if the City will let us proceed with the annexation and preliminary plat in light of the fact that the White Sewer trunk is not yet constructed through Kevin's property. Kevin has willing to risk the timing on the trunk line vs. starting his project. If the construction of the trunk line does not happen within a timely manner, it would simply mean that his preliminary plat would expire, or, be subject to a time extension. We would therefore like to request that this item be tabled until the Jan. 9, 2001 planning & zoning meeting. We will make an attempt to submit the revised plan to staff for review within the next few days. Please call me to discuss, if you have concerns. Gary A. Lee, P.E.,L.S. J -U -B Engineers, Inc. 208-376-7330 riu-B,A � October 26, 2000 Will Berg, City Clerk Planning and Zoning Commission/City Council City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 400 Meridian, ID 83642 • J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 RE: Response to Staff Report dated October 9, 2000 Cedar Springs Subdivision Members of the Commission and Council: 208-376-7330 FAX: 208-323-9336 PtECEIVED OCT ao2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE We are in receipt of the staff report for Cedar Springs Subdivision and offer the following responses to the issues raised therein: ANNEXATION AND ZONING GENERAL COMMENTS A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment? While we concur with the staff analysis of the various Comprehensive Plan provisions supporting approval of Cedar Springs, we believe that the provisions allegedly supporting denial are either taken out of context or simply do not apply. In that regard we offer the following analysis of each of the provisions characterized as not supporting annexation: ❑ "School sites should be reserved for future acquisition in advance of development of planned land use. Approval of subdivision plats may be withheld if adequate school facilities or sites are not available to serve the proposed subdivision." (Schools Chapter, 3.3) We certainly agree that the availability of school capacity is an important consideration in the approval of any residential development. Unfortunately, the Meridian School District does not have a future acquisitions map nor a facility plan to help in the planning and location of both school facilities and residential developments. The developer recognizes the importance of schools and is actively working with the School District to help provide solutions to the overcrowding issues in this area. ❑ "Support a variety of residential categories ... for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." (Land Use Chapter, 2.1U) It is not readily apparent why this particular provision supports a denial of the application. It basically states that the City's zoning ordinance should make provisions for urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, etc. to serve a population with diverse needs and housing requirements. It does not require each and every distinct development to provide multiple housing types within the development. l f'J.V Engineers Surveyors Planners 0 • City of Meridian October 26, 2000 Page 2 ❑ "Although it is recognized that urbanized development does exist within the rural areas of the Area of City Impact, the rural lands should be kept in agricultural production as long as possible until urban services (municipal sewer and water facilities and other essential services) can be provided" (Land Use Chapter, 6.3). This provision actually supports approval. This parcel is contiguous with the existing City Limits, adjoins a public park site with a recently completed master plan, has water available, and is serviceable by the White Trunk line which is currently in the planning stages for extension by the City. ❑ "All development in the USPA shall be required to connect to the municipal sewer system." (Public Services Chapter, 5.5) This is simply a matter of timing. The City of Meridian intends to build the White Trunk line and we intend to connect as soon as it is available. We are amenable to a condition of approval limiting sewer service for this project to the future White Trunk Line. ❑ "Police protection within the city limits ... should be maintained according to the recommended service ratio of 1.6 to 1.8 police officers per 1,000 persons." (Public Services Chapter, 6.8) Nothing in the public record indicates that approval of this development will cause the City to exceed the service ratio targets for police protection. In fact, the City Police Department chose not even to respond to the transmittal. Further, the additional tax revenues from this development will allow the City to hire additional officers if the City finds that necessary in the future. ❑ "Maintain a five-minute or less response time goal to all fire, police, and medical emergencies within the City." (Public Service Chapter, 6.9U) There is nothing in the public record indicating that this development will not be within a five-minute response time for fire, police, and emergency medical service providers. In fact, the City Police Department chose not to comment on the development and the City Fire Department identified no particular concerns including response time. ❑ "The City of Meridian intends to provide a wide diversity of housing types and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development." (Housing Chapter, 1.1) The City of Meridian should be commended for recognizing that healthy communities are composed of a variety of housing types. However, this provision does not mean that each and every development that is approved should include a diversity of housing types. In fact, the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance make it almost impossible to mix product types within a given development. If the City intended for a mix of residential types in this area the Comprehensive Plan would have designated the parcel as Mixed Residential rather than as Single Family Residential. C�� City of Meridian Engineers Surveyors Planners October 26, 2000 Page 3 ❑ "Housing proposals shall be phased with ...public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs." (Housing Chapter, 1.6) The City of Meridian is spending a large sum of money to extend the White Trunk Line to this and other parcels in the area. It is in the best interest of Meridian taxpayers to bring the line into service and encourage public extensions and connections as soon as possible. This spreads the costs over a larger population base and makes more efficient use of this expensive public service. We would like to have our approval in place and be ready to connect just as soon as the line becomes available. ❑ "Residential developments shall be phased in accordance with their connection to the municipal sewer system." (Housing Chapter, 1.7) The development, if approved, will necessarily be phased with the provision of sewer. If sewer does not become available the final plat will not be approved by either the Central District Health Department or the City of Meridian. ❑ "High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares." (Housing Chapter, 1.19) This provision has been taken out of context. It is meant to act as a guide for the location of projects including high density housing. While it is certainly desirable to have open space within or near higher densities, it does not necessarily follow that high density housing should be located adjacent to every city park. Furthermore, the Comprehensive Plan designates the parcel for single family residential - not multi -family residential. B. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area? As was discussed above, Policy 1.19 of the Housing Chapter encourages high density development next to open space where possible. It is unreasonable to infer that this policy was intended to require higher density housing next to every public park or dedicated open space within the City. As to the limited access to the park, the original design for Cedar Springs included six separate paths to the park site from our development. The layout was redesigned based upon the comments of the City's Parks Director who indicated that the recently completed park master plan did not support that many connections. Interestingly, in approving Cedar Springs on October 26, 2000, the ACHD Commission made a special recommendation to the City of Meridian to include additional pathways into the park. We would be happy to include additional paths if the City so desires. E. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services? rJ-u-B City of Meridian 26, 2000 October Engineers Surveyors Planners Page 4 Sewer Staff concerns over the ultimate alignment of the White Trunk have little or no impact on this project. Ultimately, the White Trunk will pass near or through this parcel, and is required for approval of the final plat. If the trunk is never built then the project never goes to final plat. If and when it is, the City will immediately begin to recoup the construction costs through hook-up fees from this development. We agree with the staff comment that this is basically a matter of timing. The Developer, is convinced that the City will build the trunk and is willing to accept the risk that the City will not build the line within a time frame that is most convenient for the developer. Schools The developer is currently working with the Meridian School District to find a mutually agreeable solution to reduce the overcrowding problem. Roadway Capacity While we appreciate staff's opinion on this matter, we remain confident that the conclusions of the traffic study are valid and well founded. The ACHD Commission accepted the conclusions of the traffic study and approved Cedar Springs on October 25. The City should note that the Highway District is requiring a deposit of $30,000 from the developer for the future construction of a signal at the Meridian RocidlUstick Road intersection. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Nothing in the public record indicates that the service providers cannot meet the five- minute response time goal of the Comprehensive Plan and the Fire Department explicitly indicated no concerns with the development. We believe that this is not a significant issue facing the project. J. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian? We obviously believe that this development is in the best interest of the City. It is consistent with the Land Use Map of the adopted Comprehensive Plan as well as the policies applicable tc residentiui t;evelopments. We are unsure as Co what features cu;i be ofjcrea to complement the future park other than the planned pathway connections. It is patently unfair to saddle future homeowners in this development with monthly fees for the upkeep of private pocket parks when there is a public park next door that will be developed and maintained with their tax dollars. Finally, the City's proposed landscape has not been adopted and does not yet have the force of law. How can we be expected to comply with an ordinance that has not been adopted and will likely change any number of times before it is adopted? Of course, we will fully comply with all adopted ordinances and will make every effort to comply with the spirit and intent of the proposed ordinance as well. ca l � • CJ.u.B J City of Meridian Engineers Surveyors Planners October 26, 2000 Page 5 Conclusion We firmly believe that our submitted application will be a positive addition to the neighborhood and the City of Meridian. We request that the planning staff provide the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council with a full evaluation of the proposed preliminary plat. A significant amount of time, effort and money have been spent designing a project that complies with the adopted plans and ordinances of the City of Meridian, not to mention the cost and effort of preparing preliminary engineering designs and a traffic study. Basic fairness dictates that a full evaluation be provided to the decision makers. We believe that the issues raised by staff are valid and deserving of a full analysis, but we also believe that none of the issues are insurmountable or deserving of denial of the project. We are very interested in working with the staff to craft a mutually agreeable resolution for all parties. In that regard, we request a meeting with the City Engineer and Planning Director prior to the December 14 public hearing to work on the issues raised in the staff report. Please determine an acceptable time and date and we will be there. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Daren S. Fluke, AICP Planning Associate DSF:Ihc cc: Shari Stiles/Brad Hawkins -Clark Gary Smith/Bruce Freckleton Kevin Howell U:\dsf\cedarsprings\cedarspringsresponse.doc Ee!'0�1 OCT 17 2000 SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET City ofMeridisl City C't.erk Off!.r Proposed Development Name Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision File No. PP -00-018 Date Reviewed 10/5/00 Preliminary Stage X Final Engineer/Developer J -U -B Engineers, Inc/Kevin Howell Development The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Ada County Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall appear on the plat: "N. MERIDIAN ROAD" "W. USTICK ROAD" "N. VENABLE LANE" The following streets names are not approved because they are duplicates or sound alike: "W. WALLIS COURT" "N. ROSS AVENUE" "W. MONTROSE STREET" "N. MARLOWE AVENUE" "N. CHURCHILL AVENUE" "N. ADDISON AVENUE" "W. SOMERSET STREET" "N. LOCKSLEY AVENUE" The following street names are approve for this plat: "N. GREENWICH WAY" "N. PRICE AVENUE" "N. ELSINORE AVENUE" "N. BYRON PLACE" "N. BRETON PLACE" "W. ASHBY DRIVE" "W. ALEXIS DRIVE" "W. FRANDON COURT' "W. BLAKE STREET' "W. THAIN STREET' "W. ALESTER STREET' "W. ANTON STREET' "W. ASHTON DRIVE" "N. BARRON WAY" "W. STAUNTON COURT' "W. WELCH STREET' "W. CORNELL COURT' "N. RHODES AVENUE" "N. STANFORD AVENUE" and "N. PORTAGE AVENUE" Please submit five (5) more names for this plat. Page 1 of 2 The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, AGEN DESIGNEES �1 Ada County Engineer John Priester Community Planning Assoc. Linda R City of Meridian Cheryl Sable REPRESENTATIVES OR Date Date /� 5 Date /v 1 Meridian Fire Dept. Representative )dA2 O\Xv�— Date 16 " q "O NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat', otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index 4N 1W 36 Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS TR\SUBS\Small Cities.FRM Page 2 of 2 0 0 100 10o 100 J , I i I I —� 1930 INTERNAL ADT PREDICTIONS CEDAR SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FIGURE 4 1760 (J • B � ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 0 October 6, 2000 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING October 10, 2000 APPLICANT Kevin Howell ITEM NO. 6 REQUEST Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat approval of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision - NW of Meridian Rnnri and Ustick Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEWER DEPARTMENT ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See Attached COMMENTS .2O aomkd- See attached comments No Comments See attached No Remarks See attached No Comment See attached Y vv" Contacted: Lk�-- e Date: 167110 Phone: -5%CC — J�3,;3) Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. October 10, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 400 Meridian, ID 83642 S ENG pp ' /v` 25 UGC- la _ (o �C'-11VED cc, 1 �nnn. City of meri ian City „.e rk Office RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision - AZ-00-019/PP-00-018 Members of the Commission: On behalf of our client Kevin Howell, we request that the Commission table the above noted applications to the November 14, 2000 public hearing. By that time the Ada County Highway District will have taken an action on the application and any required changes to the proposed preliminary plat will be a matter of the public record. Thank you in advance for your consideration and attention to this matter. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. 0459x) Daren Fluke, AICP Planning Associate cc: Gary A Lee, P.E. / L. S Kevin Howell OCT 10 '00 12:31 208 323 9336 PAGE.02 MAYOR Robert D. Corrie Cr1Y COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd C berie McCandless MEMORANDUM: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF NLERMIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 - FAX (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer J4 Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner /tX_ Re: CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 . Fag 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211- Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - FAX 888-6854 October 6, 2000 RECEIVED OC f 0 6 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE - Request for Annexation and Zoning of 100.71 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-4 for Cedar Springs Subdivision by Kevin Howell Construction (File #AZ -00- 019) - Request for Preliminary Plat of 99.83 Acres for 358 Lots by Kevin Howell Construction for a Residential Subdivision in a Proposed R-4 Zone (File #PP -00- 018) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY The subject applications propose to annex and plat approximately 100 acres consisting of 333 single-family buildable lots and 25 common lots at a gross density of 3.34 dwelling units per acre. The subdivision would surround the future 56 -acre City park at the northwest corner of Meridian/Ustick on the north and west sides. The preliminary plat proposes two new access roads onto Meridian Road and one new access road onto Ustick Road. A pre -application meeting was held with the applicant and his representatives on 7/18/00, wherein it was stressed that the proposed development needed to complement the park and provide additional amenities (i.e., pathways, etc.), that higher densities were desirable adjacent to the park, and that the City would need to make a determination that annexation of their development is in the best interest of the City. The applicant proposes two pedestrianibicycle micropath connections from the subdivision to the park, one on the north side of the park and one on the west. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North — Agricultural land and use, zoned RUT (Ada County) South — Existing agricultural; proposed City Park, zoned Limited Office (Meridian). East — Agricultural land and use, zoned RUT (Ada County) West — Rural residential homes on parcels ranging from 4-10 acres in size, zoned RUT (Ada County) AZ -00-019- PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp 0 0 Mayor, Council and P&Z October 6, 2000 Page 2 CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD The Leslie Family Trust and the Moore Family Trust are the current property owners and have submitted consent for both applications. ANNEXATION AND ZONING GENERAL COMMENTS Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, states that both the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment." In other words, there must be ample evidence supporting the necessity for the City to expand its annexed area before the Commission and/or Council approves an annexation request. Specifically, Ordinance 11-15-11 lists the following questions (shown in bold) that must be adequately answered for each property. Staff's analysis of each required finding is below each item (shown in italics): A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment; There are several Comprehensive Plan policies that both support and do not support this proposed annexation. Since the preliminary plat was submitted with the annexation, Staff considered both the annexation request and the plat together in this analysis. Comprehensive Plan policies that sYpport the annexation/plat are: • The subject property is designated as Single Family Residential on the Land Use Map of the current Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant is requesting an R-4 zone, which complies with the single family designation. • "Encourage new development ...of higher -density development within the Old Town area and lower -density development in outlying areas. " (Land Use Chapter, 1.4U) • "Encourage residential developments to provide adequate easements for future pathways. " (Transportation Chapter, 1.9U) • "Link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities. " (Parks Chapter, 3.1. e) • "Through subdivision review, annexation and zoning, emphasize the establishment of connecting trails and open space networks. " (Parks Chapter, 3.4L9 • "Encourage landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors. " (Community Design Chapter, 4.4U) Comprehensive Plan policies that do not su ort the annexation/plat are: • "School sites should be reserved for future acquisition in advance of development of planned land use. Approval of subdivision plats may be withheld if adequate school facilities or sites are not available to serve the proposed subdivision. " (Schools Chapter, 3.3) AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp 0 Mayor, Council and P&Z October 6, 2000 Page 3 • "Support a variety of residential categories. ..for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. " (Land Use Chapter, 2.1 U) • "Although it is recognized that urbanized development does exist within the rural areas of the Area of City Impact, the rural lands should be kept in agricultural production as long as possible until urban services (municipal sewer and water facilities and other essential services) can be provided" (Land Use Chapter, 6.3). • "All development in the USPA shall be required to connect to the municipal sewer system. " (Public Services Chapter, 5.5) • "Police protection within the city limits ... should be maintained according to the recommended service ratio of 1.6 to 1.8 police officers per 1, 000 persons. " (Public Services Chapter, 6.8) • "Maintain a five-minute or less response time goal to all fire, police, and medical emergencies within the City. " (Public Service Chapter, 6.9U) • "The City of Meridian intends to provide a wide diversity of housing types and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. " (Housing Chapter, 1.1) • "Housing proposals shall be phased with ... public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. " (Housing Chapter, 1.6) • "Residential developments shall be phased in accordance with their connection to the municipal sewer system. " (Housing Chapter, 1.7) • "High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. " (Housing Chapter, 1.19) B. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; The Parks Department has completed a master plan for the 56 -acre park southeast of the subject parcels, so the City anticipates an imminent change of use in this general vicinity from the existing dominant agricultural uses. Rezoning of land in this area is certainly feasible. A residential zone adjacent to the park is also feasible. However, Staff feel the last Housing policy cited above (1.19) which encourages higher density housing immediately adjacent to open spaces would be more suitable than the proposed single family homes that put their rear lots up to the park with very limited access into the park. C. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z October 6, 2000 Page 4 Staff recognizes that the "essential character of the area" will change in the near future and that the change will involve some form of residential development. As noted above and as noted by the Applicant, housing is certainly compatible with the park use. D. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Single family housing would not be hazardous or disturbing to the future park users or to the rural residences to the west. The only possible disturbance may be with the agricultural uses to the north, which could be adequately addressed through the Right -to - Farm clause in Idaho State Code. E. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; Sewer Facilities: The Public Facilities Plan shows that the proposed subdivision would be sewered via the new White Drain Trunk, which is being designed at this time. The Trunk alignment is totally dependent on whether or not the subdivision layout of the future Bridgetower Subdivision on the east side of Ten Mile, north of Ustick, is satisfactory to the City, ACRD, the irrigation district and other agencies. If this future phase of Bridgetower is approved (which has not even been submitted to the City yet), the Public Works Department would probably proceed with surveying and easements along the proposed route. They would probably require 3 to 4 months of design time followed by 6 or so months of construction. The Public Works Department anticipates the trunk being completed by the end of 2001, assuming a relatively smooth approval process. Since the Bridgetower Subdivision layout is so critical to the future White Trunk, and given the City has not received a formal application on the subdivision yet, Staff feels it is pre- mature to annex the proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision until the White Trunk alignment is better known and easements have been obtained by the City. None of the proposed subdivision can be sewered into existing sewer. All of it, along with the park, must be sewered to the White Trunk. School Facilities: The Generalized Land Use Map in the 1993 Comprehensive Plan shows a school symbol on the parcel immediately west of the subject parcel. Staff's interpretation of the symbols for parks and schools on the map has been they should ultimately be located somewhere in the vicinity in order to serve a square mile radius. In other words, they serve as indicators/reminders to begin discussions and/or negotiations for specific school sites in that Section and general area when the population growth demands it. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z October 6, 2000 Page 5 Policy 3.3, pg. 14, of the School Facilities Chapter states, "School sites should be reserved for future acquisition in advance of development of planned land use. Approval of subdivision plats may be withheld if adequate school facilities or sites are not available to serve the proposed subdivision. " In their September 22, 2000 comment letter regarding Cedar Springs Subdivision, Wendel Bigham of the School District states that Andrus Elementary School is over capacity and both Meridian Middle School and Eagle High School are at capacity. He also states that before the District could support this subdivision, they would need land dedicated or made available to the District. To Staff's understanding, the Applicant has not negotiated such agreements with the School District. The District's estimate is that, at build -out, Cedar Springs would add approximately 270 total students to the district's schools. Some evidence should be presented to the City that the Applicant and the District have some agreements in place to address this issue. Roadway Capacity: Per the Applicant's traffic study, by 2005 (the project's horizon year), this subdivision added to projected growth in the area is estimated to deteriorate the intersection at Meridian Ustick Roads to a Level of Service "E. " With growth only (not considering the subdivision), the LOS is projected to be "C. " Neither Meridian Road or Ustick Road are in the ACHD Five-year Work Program for improvements or widening. Also, neither arterial is listed in the draft Destination 2020 Plan for widening through the year 2020. Also, the traffic study uses an annual growth rate of 3.36%. However, the City's comprehensive plan consultant (Dale Rosebrock) estimates Meridian's annual growth rate over the next 5 years to be approximately 5.1 %. Given the pending construction of the White Drain trunk line, Staff feels the 3.36% figure is probably low and, therefore, even more traffic could be seen along the arterials north of Ustick, between Ten Mile and Locust Grove. Fire and Emergency Medical Services: Policy 6.9U, pg. 42, of the Public Services Chapter, states "Maintain a five-minute or less response time goal to all fire, police, and medical emergencies within the City. " Staff questions if this goal can be achieved for paramedics originating from St. Luke's Hospital or for the Fire Department until the Fire Department until the new substation on Ten Mile Road is constructed. F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; The proposed subdivision would certainly not create any more additional requirements or demands to the City than other residential uses. The primary question is one of timing. Until the White Drain Trunk is constructed, sanitary sewer service is not available for this development. G. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp • 40 Mayor, Council and P&Z October 6, 2000 Page 6 The additional traffic contributed by a 333 -house subdivision would certainly add to the adjacent roadway's congestion. However, there would also be a potential reduction in daily trips for recreation purposes given the close proximity of the City park. It would not likely be any more "excessive" than other residential uses or densities. H. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Until the City receives a report from ACHD, this finding is difficult to calculate. The ACHD Commission's hearing date on Cedar Springs has, of this report, not been scheduled. Staff recommends any decision on this application be tabled until a final ACHD report is available. I. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and None foreseeable. J. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592,11-17-1992) As noted above, Housing Diversity and Affordability are two issues addressed consistently in the Comprehensive Plan. The average lot size in the proposed subdivision is 8,961 sf., which is a typical average lot size in other R-4 zoned subdivisions in Meridian. Ashford Greens is 9,105 sf. The average lot size in Turnberry Subdivision is 8,668 sf.. The average proposed lot size in Autumn Faire is 9,132 sf. The dominant zoning (greater than 90%) in Sections 1, 2 and 3 of Township 3N, Range 1 W is R4 (minimum 8, 000 sf. lot sizes). Also, the value range of the houses in Cedar Springs is $125, 000 to $175, 000, which is within the general range of single family housing stock in Meridian. Staff does not believe the goals of housing diversity and providing housing that meets the needs of all economic levels would be achieved through annexation of this parcel, especially with a straight R-4 zone. Greater choices between housing types (i.e. offering a mix of duplexes, townhomes and single family) is necessary, especially in this northern area of the City. Additionally, the proposed development does not offer any features to complement the future City park and does not comply with the proposed landscape ordinance, which will require that a minimum of five percent of the gross land area be designated as open space. As the applicant is requesting annexation, the City is free to impose additional standards as a condition of annexation. Annexation Recommendation Arguments can be made on both sides regarding annexation of this parcel. It meets the essential requirements of contiguity and is in the Urban Service Planning Area. It's important to point out that the above findings and policies carry different weight and should not be viewed solely on the basis of the number of policies that support or don't support. However, Staff's interpretation of AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp • 0 Mayor, Council and P&Z October 6, 2000 Page 7 the Land Use Planning Act, Comprehensive Plan policies and required findings of the Zoning & Development Ordinance is that the size and scope of this annexation request does not fulfill the intent of these guiding policies and the annexation should not be granted at this time. Should the Commission and/or Council choose to annex, Staff recommends that, at a minimum, a cost benefit analysis be prepared by the Applicant detailing the overall projected costs to the City to serve the new homes and how this subdivision benefits the community as a whole if it were annexed. (Comp Plan policy #1.9U of the Housing Chapter states that the City will consider areas for annexation when it is demonstrated through such studies that the City will benefit.) PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS Since Staff is recommending denial of the annexation request, no comments are provided on the preliminary plat application at this time other than those comprehensive plan policies that pertain to plats and subdivisions cited above. Preliminary Plat Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the preliminary plat application. AZ -00-019, PP -00-018 Cedar Springs.az.pp • 4PcErv-ED SEP i s z000 CITY OF MERIDIAN wawtAa & W&zid.&-10 lvugatiow Diatvw 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 September 25, 2000 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Will Berg, City Clerk Meridian City Hall 33 East Idaho ��lc� 1a1 I� 81JQ4 Re: AZ -00-019 / PP -00-018 Proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision Dear Commissioners: The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. Contact Donna Moore at 466-7861 for further information. The District has no comment regarding the annexation and zoning on the proposed project. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. All municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. Sincerely, �` Bil Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT Cc: File — Shop File - Office Water Superintendent APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 0 • E - i ,, • 1 11111111111 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 26 September 2000 C Matthew B. Schultz J -U -B Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Avenue Boise, ID 83709 RE: Land Use Change Application — Cedar Springs Subdivision �iZ -00 - 0191 pP - o0 -OI g Dear Mr. Schultz: Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above -referenced development:. If this development is under a "rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application. Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned, operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P. Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's office, or John P. Anderson, at the District's shop. Sincerely, 6—� A.`-� rAg-- Donna N. Moore, Assistant Secretary/Treasurer cc: File Water Superintendent Kevin Howell Development Leslie Family Trust/Moore Family Trust City of Meridian enc. APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 09/29/2000 15:18 MAYOR Robert D. Come CITY COUNCIL, MEMBERS Ron Andcrson Keith Bird Tammy deWcerd Cherie McCandless 2088052 SANITARY SERVICE NUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Placc to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888.4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 PAGE 05 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 238-2499 • Fax 288-2501 . PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211 - Fax 887.1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - Rax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No,: PP -00-018 Request: Preliminary Plat of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Sally Norton. P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Your Concise City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 28 PP/FPIPFP - 30 AZ - 27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department 1?,FcETv_F.D SEP 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEP 29 100 15=27 2oeeee5052 PAGE.05 CPreparing O O Todoy's Students for r Tomorrow's / Chollenges. FO91e . Mec�d`O° SUPERINTENDENT Christine H. Donnell September 22, 2000 M Joint School District No. 2 911 Meridian Street • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • (208) 888-6701 • Fax (208) 888-6700 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Councilmen: RECE'VED SEP 2 6 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN Enclosed for your review is general information relative to schools located in the proposed project area. If you have any questions, please contact Wendel Bigham at 888-6701. Reference: Cedar Springs Subdivision Elementary School: Andrus Elementary School Middle School: Meridian Middle School High School: Eagle High School Comments and/or Recommendations: Andrus Elementary School is over capacity. The school district is currently busing students from new developments to schools outside Andrus Elementary's attendance boundary. Eagle Middle School is at capacity. Eagle High School is at capacity. We can predict that these homes, when completed, will house one hundred thirteen (113) elementary aged children, eighty-one (81) middle school aged children, and seventy-six (76) senior high aged students. The Meridian School District is not opposed to growth in our district, however this subdivision will cause increased overcrowding in all three schools. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land dedicated to the district or at least made available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer service available. Sincerely, Wendel Bigham, Supervisor of Facilities and Construction ce CENTRAL P STRICT EALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPAIRTMENT Environmental Health Division REcElvED SEP 2 6 2000 Co, onditional Use # CITY OF MERIDIAN PxeUrninary / Final / Short Plat v � Return to: ❑ Boise ❑ Eagle ❑ Garden City ,Meridian ❑ Kuna ❑ ACZ ❑ Star ❑ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics ❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other ❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. A8'. After written pproval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: entral sewage ❑ community sewage system Cl community water well ❑ interim sewage central water ❑ individual sewage individual water 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Evironmental Quality: central sewage Ll community sewage system Ll community water ❑ sewage dry lines central water 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center ❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store 14. Reviewed By: Review Sheet CDHD 9/00 Ikc Cw CENTRAL DISTRICT rkrALTp D E PARTM ENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARIVISTRONG Pl. - 301SE. IO 83708-0825 • (208)375-1;-'i I A;( 321.;500 ro prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality o/ onr enrirmunVm STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS it is recommended that storm water be pre-treated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best iVfanagement Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, July 1997. Storm -water Best ivlanagement Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. Ada / Boise County Office 7r7 N Armsiong P1. Sorsa. 10 83704 :rnnro. Heclth: 327.7499 FCmdy Planning: 327.7400 mrnunzorions 327-7450 ier,or Nurntion: 327.7460 ,mC 327.7488 --.X 327.8500 Serving Valley, Elmore, Boise, and.4da Counties Ada -WIC Satellite Office 1606 PC Cert St. Boise. 10 52705 Ph. 334-3255 FAX: 334.3355 Elmore County Office 520E 5th Street •^I. Mountain Home, i0 82647 Enviro. Health: 587.9225 Family Health: 587.4407 WIC: 587-41401? FAX: 587-3521 Valley County Office 702 N. 13. - PC ;PO Box 1__, rncccll. IC 53638 Ph. 634-7194 FAX 63d-2174 Gb d8dd bbLab88� TT:9T 00, SZ d9S MAYOR NUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Robert D. Corric A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY CITY Off' MERIDIAN 203)Z88-2499 Far 233.2501 COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC CORKS Ron Anderson 33 (EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887.2211 - Fax 88? -1297 Tammy dcWcerd (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clcrk Office Fax (208) 888-4213 DEPARTMENT (208) 384-5533 - Fax 1088.6u4 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No.: PP -00-018 Request: Preliminary Plat of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99,83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Resider Can - 26 PP/FPIPFP - 30 AZ - 27 northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FFP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig, District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department I_0/I_0d bbl_01�g88AZ=Q I 2 21HM31SHM NV I Q I H2W SS : i7 i 6)0 -SZ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • MAYOR LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF MERIDL. E IVEJDEPOARTMENT RKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO L�`!� MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Keith Bird SOEP 2 2 2000 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 CITY OF M E R IPPI,(� ARTMENT 3 •Fax 888-6854 CITY CLERK C�T TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: 1,4a . I i�- (','j 0 Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No.: PP -00-018 Request: Preliminary Plat of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads _ Building Department Your Concise Remarks: Fire Department A LC- CD tv\ I -- Police Police Department C-4- City 4-City Attorney ,4 W i L( City Engineer 4AJ D City Planner .R - Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PPJFP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department - r.11 / �p O r4 V S -L N u W -e •e f`o N 3 -fl— f� cS1 m � s � .v s ..e •vs fqi/�� t3cuu-a"--� TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN Attn: To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: ) Hearing Date File No.: PP -00-018 October 10, 2000 Request: rel a _,f.333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Sub avis o� By. Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C �C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Meridian School Distdct Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 PcF;'vED SEP 21 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN RECEIVED SEP 1 9 2000 Meridian City Water Supennteruient HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY � MAYOR LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson (208) 887-2211 •Fax 887-1297 Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Tammy deWeerd City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT Cherie McCandless (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN Attn: To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: ) Hearing Date File No.: PP -00-018 October 10, 2000 Request: rel a _,f.333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Sub avis o� By. Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C �C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Meridian School Distdct Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 PcF;'vED SEP 21 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN RECEIVED SEP 1 9 2000 Meridian City Water Supennteruient TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: &2.,12± - 1,�_ _;�ftj 0 Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No.: PP -00-018 Request: Preliminary Plat of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 RECEIVED SEP 10 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Corrie (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501 CITY OF MERIDIAN WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Keith Bird MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: &2.,12± - 1,�_ _;�ftj 0 Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No.: PP -00-018 Request: Preliminary Plat of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 RECEIVED SEP 10 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE 0 0 ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT ** AS OF FEB 06 '01 11:28 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS 21 02/06 11:13 PUBLIC WORKS OF --S 03'42" 011 149 OK 22 02/06 11:18 LEGAL DEPARTMENT EC --S 05'37" 011 149 OK 23 02/06 11:24 208 888 6854 EC --S 04'04" 011 149 OK --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RECEIVED ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT FEB - 5 2001 Planning and Development Division erry of MERIDIAN Development Application Report Preliminary Plat Cedar Springs n/w/c Meridian Road/Ustick Road Modification MAZ-00-019/MPP-00-018 REVISED The application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Cedar Springs is a 268 -lot residential subdivision on 99.8 -acres. The site also includes one office lot and .v one elementary school site, and one possible multi -family or office/commercial site. The applicant is also requesting annexation into the City of Meridian and a rezone from RUT to R-4. The site is ,a located generally north of Ustick Road on the west side of Meridian Road. This development is . estimated to generate 4,168 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted trafficstudy. „- On October 25, 2000, the ACHD Commission reviewed and approved Cedar Springs Subdivision, a 333 -lot residential subdivision. The applicant has modified the site plan. The new plan has fewer residential lots, the addition of office/commercial lots, and a school site. Changes to this report have been made in bold. r Roads impacted by this development: Meridian Road Ustick Road ACHD Commission Date — February 7, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. Pale 1 • January 16, 2001 Project Kick-off Meeting MERIDIAN PARK SITE TILING PROJECT ATTENDANCE LIST NAME ADDRESS PHONE Martin Yurke 3485 N. Linder Rd. 888-3633 Ken Aschenbrenner 4990 N. Meridian Rd 888-3580 Matt Schuttz, Project Engineer J -U -B Engineers 373-7330 Dale Cooper 1030 W. Ustick 888-4810 Dick Richards 1058 W. Ustick 888-6741 Ranney Endicott 1450 W. Ustick 888-4888 Warren Watson 1680 W. Ustick 888-6519 Lester Vogel 3610 N. Linder Rd. 888-2196 Duane Hays, ACHD Rd. Maint. 440 N. Cloverdale 387-6350 Elroy Huff, Meridian Parks 11 W. Bower 888-3579 Tom Kuntz, City Parks 11 W. Bower 888-3579 Kevin Hughes, Designer W&H Pacific, Inc. 342-5400 David Caneer, Civil Engineer W&H Pacific, Inc. 342-5400 Gary Smith, City Engineer 200 E. Carlton, Suite 100 887-2211 Ross Oyen, ACHD Drainage 318 E. 37th, Boise, ID 83714 387-6256 I AProject\822212\Word\ 1-16MtgMins.doc r ry r r O ��� � O O O m a' Phone: 111 W SOLD BY CASH 1 ' w c Na r O I VI t O 100--11 W -J N i ! 1 w o1< Q' o n rt 0� 'e C O 00 L3 m omm mc� Z a i> 03m W N T' 00 0 N C C, N m C.n ODr IS r co ca W N ru Date O t7 Address Phone: SOLD BY CASH 1 ' fD CHARGE ON ACCT. MDSE. RETD. PAID OUT I 100--11 N x 2re qI Za �1 tWJi N I W C Y -7- Z } I C/ a If O I c I P V y I I N CIR I I EE I I gg� �' sit o N CITY OF MERIDIAN "Hub of Treasure Valleyrl 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 888-4433 ,w \iUJIUIIICI ) Order No. Name Date O Address Phone: SOLD BY CASH 1 ' C.O.D. CHARGE ON ACCT. MDSE. RETD. PAID OUT I 100--11 x 2re qI Za I Y -7- Z I C/ I If I I ss I I I I I I I I All claims and returned goods MUST be accompanied by this bill. TAX 0 012 3 5 7 gyceived TOTAL GS -202-2 _ PRINTED IN U.S.A. i FRINiEO WITH ((` SOY INK 61,(i ITY OF MERIDIAN "Hub of Treasure Valley" 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 888-433 Customers Order No. Date Date �T Name (: /p Ad d IS� /D cn Phone: J 5p—?.?.34!� SOLD BY 9 t `0 C.O.D. rr CHARGE ON ACCT. MDSE. RET D. PAID OUT r , ' / �J (D I cm z 3 6 CD o m 00 O I o I .P:b I co I 1 I I I I I I I I I i I i I I I All claims and returned goods MUST be accompanied by this bill. TAXRe I 0012359 Byceive �f TOTAL i QJ OS -202-2 C7 PRINTED IN U.S.A. ��.%�Rr,vIN./ ) r ru LU 11111- 0 O w r Ln W W O O O m 03 r 8 Lll 00 mm 33m Ko -0n m c, Dn20 K ONO ;0C.Zz9 a N G) Z N 0 0 m D m Z N 0 O c m m n 2 � 0 0 o 0 m CL zc hie O In O cn c i o m C o � 0 m Z o Z m m rn 0 0 W V O c0 Z A n A 00 mm cc m n° qqc V > r U) IN Z Z D w mmZ �m m m Z C1 m = cn CD (D A o cm z 3 6 CD o m 00 O o o .P:b co 40 Traffic Impact Study Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision Meridian Road and Ustick Road August 31, 2000 Prepared by: J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, Idaho 83709 (208) 376-7330 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. 0 • Proposed Development The developer plans to build a residential subdivision west of Ustick Road and north of Meridian Road. This site is approximately one -mile north of Meridian and 2.5 miles from the freeway (1-84) interchange. Three hundred twenty six (333) single-family dwelling units are planned. A preliminary site plan can be found on the previous page. There are will be two accesses for this development onto Meridian Road and one access at Ustick Road, west of Meridian Road. Existing Roadways Meridian Road is classified as an arterial within the Meridian area. It is currently a two-lane rural roadway without curb and gutter north of Ustick Road. The southbound approach to Ustick Road has a left -turn bay at the intersection. Meridian Road is a three -lane urban roadway south of Ustick Road with sidewalk, curb and gutter. The average daily traffic counts, taken by ACHD in August 2000, showed about 5690 vehicles per day south of Ustick Road and 4160 north of Ustick Road. The speed limit is 35 mph on Meridian Road, south of Ustick, and 50 mph north of Ustick Road. Meridian Road, south of Ustick Road, looking north Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study Page 3 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. 0 Ustick Road intersects with Meridian Road north of the City of Meridian. Ustick Road functions as a collector. Ustick Road is a two-lane rural roadway with a 35 mph posted speed limit. It has several older farm buildings and several single-family residences abutting the roadway that have direct access to Ustick Road. Ustick Road, west of Meridian Road, looking east Daily traffic counts were collected at two locations on Ustick Road. The first was taken west of Meridian Road. This count had an average daily traffic of 3,960 vehicles. The other count on Ustick Road was taken east of Meridian Road and recorded 4,350 vehicles. Ustick Road, east of Meridian Road, looking west Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study 1 Page 4 F� t 1 t t The Traffic Impact Study and the Level of Service (LOS) calculations have all been based upon the peak hour traffic volumes. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes are also helpful in understanding the impacts of the traffic and are used in figure 4 to compare the internal traffic to the standards. The evening peak hour was compared to the Average Daily Traffic volumes to determine a relationship for this area of Ada County. The peak hour was 10.33% of the ADT. Figure 2, below, diagrams the peak hour turning movement counts. 3 J 160 34 7 i 2t7 54 Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study Page 5 1 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Traffic Counts The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) provided average daily traffic counts (ADT) on Ustick Road counted on August 2, 2000. At that time, the counts showed 5,787 vehicles per day on Meridian Road south of Ustick and 4,156 vehicles per day north of Ustick Road. On Ustick the counts tallied 3,960 west of Meridian Road and 4,352 east of Meridian Road. Manual turning movement counts were also taken by J -U -B at the intersection for the 1 evening peak -hour. A summary of those turning movement counts is included in the appendix. F� t 1 t t The Traffic Impact Study and the Level of Service (LOS) calculations have all been based upon the peak hour traffic volumes. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes are also helpful in understanding the impacts of the traffic and are used in figure 4 to compare the internal traffic to the standards. The evening peak hour was compared to the Average Daily Traffic volumes to determine a relationship for this area of Ada County. The peak hour was 10.33% of the ADT. Figure 2, below, diagrams the peak hour turning movement counts. 3 J 160 34 7 i 2t7 54 Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study Page 5 1 IJ -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. 0 r fj F1 t Existing Level of Service • A Level of Service (LOS) was calculated using the software from the Highway Capacity Manual and the turning movement counts collected by J -U -B. The ADT counts were used to determine the hour during an average day when the traffic volumes were highest. That hour appears to be in the evening between 5:00 and 6:00 PM. As stated earlier, this peak hour traffic was approximately 10% of the average daily traffic. The morning and noon peak hours had considerably less volumes that the evening peak hour. Consequently the evaluations of the intersection have been modeled after the afternoon peak hour. Stop sign at Ustick Road/Meridian Road for the westbound approach to the intersection Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study The average delay for the intersection currently is 14.8 seconds per vehicle during the peak hour. This amount of delay equates to a high "B" Level of Service. Of the four separate approaches, the northbound through/right lane had the highest delay averaging 18 seconds per vehicle (LOS "C"). This intersection would operate poorly as a two-way stop control under the current traffic volumes. If traffic on Meridian Road was unobstructed and traffic on Ustick Road was required to stop, the Ustick Road LOS degrades to LOS "F" for westbound traffic and LOS "D" for the eastbound approach. Under this scenario, the traffic on Meridian Road benefits at the expense of excessive delays imposed on the Ustick Road traffic. Page 6 w - J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. Trip Generation The amount of traffic generated by this proposed development was determined from an Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) study of hundreds of residential subdivisions. The traffic generated is related to the number of dwelling units. For a 333 -dwelling residential development, 351 trip ends are generated during the pm peak hour. Of these trip -ends, 224 enter the subdivision and 127 depart. These arrivals and departures were further divided into the three access points for the subdivision. ft ft .. ., Im Trip Distribution The traffic generated by this subdivision must enter and exit from the two adjacent accesses on Meridian Road and/or one access on Ustick Road. The traffic internal to this subdivision was separated geographically to the three accesses. Most of the attractions are to the south (the City of Meridian) and the east (Boise City). The traffic was distributed accordingly. The PM traffic was distributed onto the existing roadways in the following manner (see Figure 3): Meridian Road (access 1, S): 28 exit, 49 enter Meridian Road (access 2, N): 67 exit, 118 enter Ustick Road (access 3): 32 exit, 57 enter 11 NB left turn, exit 17 SB right turn, exit 19 SB right turn, enter 30 NB left turn, enter 26 NB left turn, exit 41 SB right turn, exit 47 SB right turn, enter 71 NB left turn, enter 18 EB left turn, exit 14 WB right turn, exit 25 EB left turn, enter 32 WB right turn, enter This traffic generated by the proposed subdivision is added to the existing traffic with the expected growth in traffic and the anticipated future traffic from adjacent external connections to this subdivision. The horizon year for this study is at full build -out and full occupancy of the development. In this situation, we have used the year 2005 as the horizon year. The anticipated traffic growth in this area north of Meridian is expected to be 3.36 percent per year. Planners from Compass provided this growth rate based upon their traffic demand computer model. The afternoon traffic has higher volumes than the morning, generally. For this reason, the afternoon peak hour being the most demanding time of the day, we have Cedar Springs Subdivision - Traffic Impact Study Page 7 0 47 26 ACCESS 2 183 LOTS -4 18 ENTER 167 EXIT 41 71 ACCESS 3 L32 81 LOTS -18 14 Peak hour trip ENDS 57 ENTER 25 Distribution 32 EXIT CEDAR SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FIGURE 3 r U -B ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS *OCIATED EARTH SCIENCES INV BIOLOGY • GEOLOGY • ENGINEERING • SOIL SURVEYS • SOIL AND WATER QUALITY • RESOURCE PLANNING AND SITE INVESTIGATIONS 4696 Overland Rd., Suite 516 Boise, Idaho 83705 (208) 336-8661 April 28, 2000 Mr. Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. J -U -B Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709 Dear Gary: A soil investigation on approximately 100 acres of land located in the SE of Section 36, TAN., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, was completed on 4/25/2000. Soil physical characteristics and soil internal drainage conditions were examined and described. Field notes (descriptions) and a plat map showing location of test holes are attached. The purpose of this investigation was to identify soil properties (texture, structure, restrictive layers, soil color, and water table depths) that need to be considered in design of storm drainage facilities, depth of building footings, etc. Free water, at the time of excavation, was at depths of 100-115" in the seven test holes described. These groundwater levels will rise as the irrigation season progresses. I would predict the levels will be within 40-50" of the ground surface by the middle of August. Monitoring wells were installed in all seven of the test holes and water levels should be measured and recorded every 2 weeks from about May 1 - September 30, 2000. The water levels likely will drop after about September 1. Lime -Silica cemented hardpans, compacted layers, and some high clay layers were found in most of the test holes. All of the soils were underlain with extremely gravelly sandy substratums. An estimated permeability is shown on the attached field sheets for each layer identified. See the field notes for more detailed description. If you have any questions on this report, please call me at (208) 672-9213. J -U -B E ngineers AD F� 1� L i; MAY 0 3 2`f�0 � tQ�ISE, /�� 4w-✓ Sincerely, Glen H. Logan Certified Professional Soil Scientist AES •Soil Evaluation Evaluation Date 4/25/2000 Requested By Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. JUB Engineers Inc. Address 250 S. Beechwood Ave. Suite 201 City Boise State Idaho Zip Code 83709 Phone (208) 376-7330 Lot Size — Bedrooms — Parcel 100 Acres + Legal Description Part of SE of Section 36 T. 4N. R 1W B M Ada County, Idaho SIC)np_ n-1 Rv r-1 Pn N T.nnan M)P.P F-1 Pit TH 1 Pit TH2 Pit TH3 0-11" Silt loam (15-20% 0-9" Silt loam (20-25% 0-13" Silt loam (20% clay), clay), lOYR 3/3, clay), IOYR 3/4, 10YR 3/4, common many fine roots, common fine roots, fine roots, estimated estimated estimated permeability 1-2"/hr. permeability 2"/hr. permeability 1- 211/hr. 13-24" Silty clay loam (30% 11-17" Silt loam (25% clay), clay), IOYR 4/4, 10YR 4/4, common 9-20" Silty clay loam common fine roots, fine roots, estimated (30% clay), IOYR estimated permeability permeability 1 "/hr. 4/4, few fine roots, .5-1 "/hr. estimated 17-25" Weak to moderately permeability.5- 24-36" Moderately cemented cemented hardpan, 1 "/hr. hardpan, fractured, fractured, few fine few fine roots in roots, estimated 20-35" Weak to moderately fractures .02-.05"/hr. permeability .02- cemented hardpan, :05"/hr. very compact, no 36-52" Loam (15% clay), roots, estimated slightly compact, 25-45" Weakly cemented permeability 7.5YR 4/4, no roots, hardpan, very .02"/1ir. estimated permeability compact, no roots, 1 "/hr. estimated 35-57" Weakly cemented permeability .02"/hr. loamy fine sand, 52-72" Very gravelly fine very compact, sandy loam (10% 45-60" Gravelly silt loam l OYR 6/6, no roots, clay), l OYR 4/6, no (20% clay), I OYR estimated roots, estimated 4/6, no roots, permeability permeability 2-4"/hr. estimated .02"/hr. permeability 2"/hr. 72-135" Extremely gravelly 57-70" Extremely gravelly and cobbly loamy 60-96" Extremely gravelly loamy coarse sand medium sand (<5% loamy coarse sand (<5% clay), clay), variegated (<5% clay), variegated color, no color, no roots, variegated color, no roots, estimated estimated permeability roots, estimated permeability 15"/hr. 15"/hr. permeability 15"/hr. 70-135" Extremely gravelly 96-112" Extremely gravelly and cobbly coarse coarse sand (0% sand (0% clay), clay), variegated variegated color, no color, no roots, roots, estimated estimated permeability 15 - permeability 15- 20"/hr. 20"/hr. Additional Info: TH1 - Free water (water table) at 102" depth. TH2 - Free water (water table) at 112" depth. TH3 - Free water (water table) at 110" depth. AES Soil Evaluation Evaluation Date 4/25/2000 Requested By Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. JUB Engineers Inc Address 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Suite 201 City Boise State Idaho Zip Code 83709 Phone (208) 376-7330 Lot Size — Bedrooms — Parcel 100 Acres + Legal Description Part of SE of Section 36, T.4N., R. 1W. B. M. Ada County, Idaho Slone n - i o RirAl17at-Pfl Rv (,l an N T.nrran (''DCC Additional Info: TH4 - Free water (water table) at 104" depth. TH5 - Free water (water table) at 107" depth. TH6 - Free water (water table) at 115" depth. Pit TH4 I I Pit THS I s Pit TH6 0-11" Silt loam (25% clay), 0-9" Silt loam (20-25% 0-13" Silt loam (20-25% l OYR 3/3, many fine clay), 10YR 3/3, clay), 1OYR 3/3, many roots, estimated many fine roots, fine roots, estimated permeability I "/hr. estimated permeability 1-2"/hr. permeability 1- 11-23" Silty clay loam (30% 211/hr. 13-32" Silt loam (25% clay), clay), 1OYR 4/4, 10YR 3/4, common common fine roots, 9-21" Silty clay loam fine roots, estimated estimated (30% clay), 10YR permeability 1 "/hr. permeability .5-1"/hr. 4/4, common fine roots, .5-1"/hr. 32-52" Sandy loam (10% 23-35" Silty clay loam (25- clay), lOYR 5/4, very 30% clay), 7.5YR 4/4, 21-28" Weakly cemented compact, few fine few fine roots, hardpan, very roots, estimated estimated fractured, few fine permeability .05"/hr. permeability .5-1 "/hr. roots in fractures, .02-.05"/hr. 52-71" Weakly cemented 35-52" Silty clay loam (35% hardpan, very clay), 7.5YR few fine 28-45" Moderately compact, no roots, roots, estimated cemented hardpan, estimated permeability permeability .05- non -fractured, .02"/hr. 1 "/hr. impermeable 71-128" Extremely gravelly 52-63" Very gravelly clay 45-74" Sandy loam (10% fine sand (0% clay), loam (30% clay), clay), very variegated color, no 7.5YR 4/4, mottled, compact, 7.5YR roots, estimated no roots, estimated 4/4, no roots, permeability 15"/hr. permeability .5 "/hr. estimated permeability 63-129" Extremely gravelly .05"/hr. and cobbly loamy fine sand (<5% clay), 74-110" Very gravelly sandy variegated color, no loam (10% clay), roots, estimated 7.5YR 4/4, no permeability 15"/hr. roots, estimated permeability 2- 411/hr. 110-130" Extremely gravelly and cobbly loamy fine sand (<5% clay), variegated color, no roots, estimated permeability 15"/hr. Additional Info: TH4 - Free water (water table) at 104" depth. TH5 - Free water (water table) at 107" depth. TH6 - Free water (water table) at 115" depth. AES Soil Evaluation Evaluation Date 4/25/2000 Requested By Gary A. Lee P E /L S JUB Engineers Inc Address 250 S. Beechwood Ave. Suite 201 City Boise State Idaho Zip Code 83709 Phone _(208) 376-7330 Lot Size — Bedrooms — Parcel 100 Acres + Legal Description Part of SE of Section 36, T.4N., R.1W B M Ada County, Idaho SlnnP n-1 % V",1 4---A n, r., . TT r _ Additional Info: TH7 - Free water (water table) at 100" depth. Pit TH7 t 0-9" Silt loam (25% clay), lOYR 3/4, many fine roots, estimated permeability 1 "/hr. 9-26" Silty clay loam (30- 30-35% 3 5%clay), l OYR 4/4, common fine roots, estimated permeability .05- 1"/hr. 26-38" Silt loam (25% clay), compact, 1OYR 3/3, strong prismatic structure, corm -non fine roots, estimated permeability .5-1"/hr. 38-70" Very gravelly sandy clay loam (30%+ clay), 7.5YR 4/4, very mottled, very compact, few fine roots in upper 20", estimated permeability .02"/hr. 70-125" Extremely gravelly and cobbly loamy fine sand (<5% clay), variegated color, mottled, no roots, estimated permeability 15"/hr. Additional Info: TH7 - Free water (water table) at 100" depth. p xeao , ,y • 8611 s (1 38.5 x x04.2 • 80.9 x70.5 82.4 343 x x xdy,! x861 4 80. x 88.I _ VO c6l /�It,7 �C• d2.S x Ci/✓r- S,, j S. �C x84.7 x76.1 x791 61.7 x861 G•� x82.8 x84.3 x34.8 843 x 31.6 Z x ice x80.9 kP/fa .612, 4 A � ss 8 x793 x87.7 „ (�j x83.7 x34.7 x33.. 73.2 79.8 x lrx a d x87.0 78. x80.6aJj/f I x83.3 _ x 79.1 x 82.3 - 79.1 84.4 84.8 x I x30.3 82 7 x84.0 x87.0 763 - - -_' -- __ _ _ x x82-5 77. _ x70.3. -,x30-5 11.3.0 x xas.2 xis. - x ez+ x as. t 96.4 793 ) x 1 73.2 .80.5 31.7 III x0.24 r � 79.1 x D-5 x ata 843 + x x86.8 e J Vo 8211 x - ._0. x 79.7 x 36.6 73.3 81.2 x .8 eo.l x81.1 x (� 1 $7.1 x 34.7 x x ea x x 79.6 - - 80a x31'3 AS.J x327 x • x x 81.4 x 862 x 332 !� A x .84.2 x x30.9 xa3.4 $68 i-r,S e - - a1.0 x e A- x833 a" x83.0 82.9 -- -- s 31.1 x 33.6 x8.3 x34.0 xC&2 x88..7 x e6.D J 62.0 79. = x81.1 x x81.6 a3. i x 82.6 x x 861 86. t 863 1 04.2 x x ,�, x 79. x 5 W.6_� x-„ x30'2 ' x al x !1 6�A x833 ryiRa„! x81.11' r -x x36.3 i - .� 6 n I 8113 x .D x11°' U e4.s x383 aoJ x79.6 -_ x _. xa26 xalo _862 Q - 79.7 I x 81.9 85J x TICK RD Q r; QUITCLAIM DEED \ For Value Received Moore or Les, Inc., an Idaho Corparation do hereby convey, release, remise and forever quit claim unto The Leslie Family Trust dated 11/17/92 and the Moore Fa&ly Trost dated 11/17/92 whose current address is 1185 Osprey F-Idge Rd. Eagle, Idaho 83616 the following described premises, to -wit: see attached Exhibit "A" ADA R VINVRERD AARO nISE. IDAHO 1999 DE 30 Ph 3= G2 together with their appurtenances. Dated: December 30, 1999 'Moore Or Les, Inc., Tey Mnow wet Wd as an a000rrtmodaDoa a>* K hu NA 0Me trt n%W ee k b daaeutlon. Inun b110r Of dW ort M. RECORDED- REQUEST OF FEEJ---DEPU 99123610 AMEFIICAN LAND TITLE M STATS OF IDAHO 1 COLNTYOFL6t,0J PN. �B I:ASst on this � day of f 10 In 1.: ear l9 �r before Inc. a Not ry Public In and for said state, persoa411y a C On l t 1 i — known to me .0 i✓ txcidoaf of ue oorpQatldP thv nese ned the wiltia idPaanma P J gV who eumacd the inmumeat on brhalf of raid corp--. and adtn"IcdW to 9Q' e` such e(gWration executed the a"Ine. SPA TR Q IN WMMS3 WMMWP. I. have he"Unto set my hand attd affMcd my alilcial the day and YCAY In thin certificate fiat above tuna M Gj Notary Publie V" ReaitGnd at Idaho' L Cvri,o1m fxp S-l�-oma A oR, �ro n d E m o d L 'n3 p U. U d LL n IZA r CU O Z L go„ a dH U 0. LL V00/T00 In 21SIOU 'ONR 5-11-f 9CC6 CZC ROM W CT 00/ZT/60 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - (continued) PILE 00: $1842 EXHIBIT A FARCFL I: THE WEST 1/2 NEST 1/2 SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, ROIBB MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY, TO -WIT: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWE9T 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 9EGINNINO AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE NORTH 89°59'48" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 A DISTANCE OF 462.63 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF 9EGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00'147156' EAST A DISTANCE OF 443.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'113'40" EAST A DISTANCE OF 129.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00"11'56" WEST A DISTANCE OF 443.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 991°59'40" WEST A DISTANCE OF 134.62 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, AND EXCEPT A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, 90i9S MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT AN ALUMINUM CAP HARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, ALSO OtING THE CENTERLINE OF USTICK ROAD, NORTH 69"20'51" WEST 1996.65 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE LEAVING SAID SECTION LINE, NORTH 0°32'33" EAST 25.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID USTICK ROAD, ALSO BEING THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH RICHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 89"20'51" WEST 66.13 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY ` LINE NORTH 0°417'441' EAST 416.52 FEET TO AN IRON PINT THENCE NORTH 1"24'08" EAST 686.62 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH 1/16 SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH 1/16 SECTION LINE SOUTH 89"15'45" EAST 52.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH 1/16 SECTION LINE SOUTH 0"32'33" WEST 1302.98 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR USTICK ROAD. PARCEL II'.: THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE NRRIDIAN ALSO (CONTINUEID) t00/N00 in 3SIOg '9N3 g -11-I' 9CC6 M SONS Sb:CT 00/9T/60 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - (continued) FILE NO: 51842 BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE I WEST, BOISE HERIDIANp THENCE WEST 743 FEBT7 THENCE SOUTH 201 FEET; THENCE EAST 743 FEET; THENCE NORTH 201 FEET TO THB PLACE OF BEGINNING - EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE'USSCATBED PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 181 oV DEEDS AT PACE 67, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR MERIDIAN ROAD. PARCEL III: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH. RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO? MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS! BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIN MARkTNG THE SOUTHWEST coRNER OF SECTION 36, TDIM SHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, ALSO BEING THE CENTER LINE OF USTICK ROAD, 60UTH 86144'00" PAST 2662.19 FEET TO AN IRON PIN MARKING THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER Ole' SAID SECTION 367 THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH SECTION LINE, AND ALONG THE NORTH, -SOUTH CENTER QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, NORTH 0°26'40" EAST 25.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID USTICK ROAD, ALSO BEING THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH -SOUTH CENTER QUARTER SECTION LINE, NORTH 0126'40" EAST 639.49 FEET TO A POINT7 THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH -SOUTH CENTER QUARTER SECTION LINE, NORTH BB°50'42" WEST 84.71 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 1.31'09" WEST 639.26 FEET TO AN IRON PIN ON THE SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-oP-WAY LINE, SOUTH 88°44'00" EAST 96,71 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL IV: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OP THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE I WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIN MARKING THC SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERXDIAN; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 26, SOUTH 68144'00" BAST 2662.19 FEET TO AN IRON PIN MARKING THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH SECTION LINE, AND ALONG THE NORTH-50UTH CENTER QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, NORTH 0'26'40" EAST 1328.96 FEET TO A POINT, BEING THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH -SOUTH CENTER QUARTER SECTION LINE NORTH 0"26'40" EAST 664.49 FEET TO A POINT; (CONTINUED) I00/000 12] HIM 'UNH 9 -a -t 9006 CZC 90Z.9 66:CT 00/ZT/60 MERIDIAN AND USTICK ROAD PROPERTY PROPERTY OWENER ADDRESS LIST WITHIN 300 -FEET HOWARTH CHARLES H & TONIA L 4120 N LINDER RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5416 WHITE WANDA TRUST 4399 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 4273 N MERIDIAN RD SAYLOR GEORGE & LOLA F TRUST SAYLOR GEORGE & LOLA F TRUSTEE PO BOX 1457 KAMIAH ID 83536-1457 N USTICK CIR HOWELL KEVIN A 1087 W RIVER ST STE 250 BOISE ID 83702-0000 N MERIDIAN RD n WHITE FAY M 4015 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5421 KENNEDY JOHN 218 RUBY ST BOISE ID 83705-5940 USTICK COOPER DALE E & COOPER KATHY A 1030 W USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5452 W USTICK RD PAULSON OSCAR I & MAXINE D AND PAULSON JAMES I & PAULA A 4118 CATALINA RD BOISE ID 83705-0000 W USTICK RD LITZ GRACE R LIFE ESTATE LITZ KENNETH L 870 W USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5452 LESLIE FAMILY TRUST MOORE FAMILY TRUST 1185 OSPREY RIDGE RD EAGLE ID 83616-0000 W USTICK RD BRINEGAR E E & BRINEGAR VIRGINIA 5190 N LOCUST GROVE RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 650 W USTICK RD MYER JACK J & BERNELDA M TRST MYER J J & B M CO -TRUSTEES PO BOX 818 MERIDIAN ID 83680-0818 4010 N MERIDIAN RD El BAYLESS DAVID N & BAYLESS EUNICE J 3860 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5420 BLADES V L & I R REV LVNG TRST 540 E USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5548 MCBIRNEY PROPERTY TRUST 1162 BENTOAK LN SAN JOSE CA 95129-3104 ❑SIMUNICH JOE & KATHERINE SIMUNICH JOE & KATHERINE 955 W USTICK RD rJ'U'B RECEIVED -� MAY 24 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN May 24, 2001 -X&� Will Berg, City Clerk City of Meridian 660 E. Watertower, 2"d Floor Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision Revised Site Plan Dear Mr. Berg: • J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS Regional Office 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208-376-7330 Fax: 208-323-9336 Please find ten (10) sets of attached revised preliminary plat for Cedar Springs Subdivision and the memorandum written to Shari Stiles on May 18, 2001. We look forward to presenting this item at the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. w4ez--- - Matthew B. Schultz, P.E. Project Engineer MBS:Ihc Attachments cc: Kevin Howell f:\projects\11644\admin\berg-revised.doc If =r If J -U -B -A May 18, 2001 Shari Stiles Meridian Planning and Zoning 660 E. Watertower, 2nd Floor Meridian, ID 83642 40 J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 208-376-7330 FAX: 208-323-9336 RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision Revised Preliminary Plat Dear Ms. Stites: Please find the attached revised preliminary plat for the Cedar Springs Subdivision for your approval. We are currently scheduled for the June 5, 2001 City Council meeting and would like consideration of the following revisions: 1. We are proposing a 480 -foot -long by 100 -foot -wide open space between the north O boundary of the park and the street interior to our subdivision. A 15 -foot -wide drivable surface will be constructed across the open space to provide emergency access to the north side of the park. The chain-link fence at this point will have a "breakaway" gate to allow emergency vehicular traffic only. Pedestrians may access the park at another location by a pathway with bollards at each end. We believe this modification addresses the emergency access and visibility concerns expressed by staff. 2. The areas indicated as single -lot '10" sites have been revised to indicate R-4 lots in accordance with the original application. Due to the addition of the elementary school site and open space increases in accordance with the adopted landscape ordinance, the final buildable lot count is 273 with nearly 6% of usable open space. The original application and layout indicated 333 buildable tots. V We trust these revisions address the City's concerns and look forward to the presentation at the City Council on June 5, 2001. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information prior to the meeting. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. 1-7 Matthew B. Schultz, P.E. Project Engineer MBS:lhc Attachment cc: Kevin Howell, Howell -Murdoch f:\projects\11644\admin\shari-park.doc I�� May 31, 2001 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 5, 2001 AZ 00-019 APPLICANT J -U -B Engineers ITEM NO. 19 REQUEST Continued P/H from 4/17/01 - AZ of 100.71 acres from RUT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs - NW of Meridian and Ustick Roads AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS See previous Item packet OTHER: Contacted: ��a. ��' _� �� Date: (P�4 Phone: -ta Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. 0 May 31, 2001 9 "111 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 5, 2001 �d 11 APPLICANT J -U -B Engineers ITEM NO. approval of 333 building REQUEST Continued P/H from 4/17/01 - preliminary plat R-4 zone for proposed Cedar lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in a proposed Springs COMMENTS AGENCY See previous item packet CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY - f CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: r7i IDAHO POWER: ) p �? US WEST: GAS: `' INTERMOUNTAIN I BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: --pp U� OTHER: /&� (.tea Contacted: {�lG� ffi SCSI " � '� L-011— Date: LN / Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the city of Meridian. • NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on April 17, 2001, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of J -U -B Engineers, Inc. for a request of annexation and zoning of 100.71 acres from RUT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision; Furthermore, the applicant also requests Preliminary Plat approval of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision generally located northwest of North Meridian Road and West Ustick Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, and is available for inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing, and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Oral testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes per person. Written materials may be submitted seven (7) days prior to the above hearing date so that all interested parties may examine them prior to the hearing. All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 72 hours prior to the public meeting. DATED this 23`d day of March, 2001 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., IT CLERK <<+' ri n trnrry,r PUBLISH 301h of March and 13th of April, 2001. ,111' ,<`t f y _ KUL z Z S 0 � Q W m J _ Cl) N_ ,� V � Z_ � Q CL CL U) Q Z W V 05 V) O O O 9TY CLERK FILE CHECKLIS;rb Project Name: Cedar Springs File No. PP -00-018 Contact Name: Nancy Taylor Phone: Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Level: 41 Transmittals to agencies and others: Q Notice to newspaper with publish dates: Certifieds to property owners: 376-7330 Hearing Date: R] Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: Notes: i a rnR `( o h 1� I oc)k City Council level: ❑ Transmittals to agencies and others: ❑ Notice to newspaper with publish dates: M Certifieds to property owners: ❑ City Council Action: September 12, 2000 October 10, 2000 and Approve ❑ Deny Hearing Date: and !i\ck i M alt t' ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Findings / Conclusions / Order received from attorney on: Findings / Conclusions / Order: ❑ Approved by Council: Rasokrt;ons: Original Res /Copy Cert: Minutebook Copy Res / Copy Cert: City Clerk City Engineer ❑ Copies Disbursed: City Planner City Attorney Sterling Codifiers El Findings Recorded Project File Copy Resl Original Can Ada County (CPAs) Development Agreement: Applicant Ordinances: Recorded Ordinances. sent for signatures: ❑ ❑ signed by all parties: Original: Minutebook Copiest°: CityClerk State Tax Comm. State Treasurer, Auditor, Assessor Sterling Codifiers Approved by Council: F—]Approved Attorney CityEngineer F -]Recorded: City Pte niter Proettfle Applicant (if appl) F—] Copies Disbursed: Findings / Orders: Originat Minutebook Copies to: "cant Ordinance No. Resolution No. le Ent e City Engineer City ❑ Approved by Council: F-1 Recorded: Deadline: 10 days City Planner City Attorney •• Record Vacation Findings" Recorded r)evelopment Agreements: Original:Fireproof File F-1 Published in newspaper: Copies to:Applicant Project file F -]Copies Disbursed: City Engineer City Ptorner City Attorney Notes: TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: J -U -B Engineers, Inc Location of Property or Project: north of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z „TT Richard Hatcher, F r u S 1 Keith Borup, P/Z Wac(2-i M Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District S -t�1 Community Planning Assoc- Central Central District Health t M M 'd Irri District Robert Corne, a)-�1C � h c v LUa S Ron Anderson, CK Tammy deWeerd, nG i ' �Cn i a t} ' Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless �1Cxr1 i`�S� Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Your Concise Remarks: Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen -26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ -27 Nampa e, ;Ai g. Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department KUB OF TREASURE VALLEY LEGAL DEPARTMENT MAYOR A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501 Robert D. Corrie CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 Ron Anderson MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Keith Bird (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Tammy deWeerd City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 Cherie McCandless TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: J -U -B Engineers, Inc Location of Property or Project: north of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z „TT Richard Hatcher, F r u S 1 Keith Borup, P/Z Wac(2-i M Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District S -t�1 Community Planning Assoc- Central Central District Health t M M 'd Irri District Robert Corne, a)-�1C � h c v LUa S Ron Anderson, CK Tammy deWeerd, nG i ' �Cn i a t} ' Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless �1Cxr1 i`�S� Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Your Concise Remarks: Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen -26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ -27 Nampa e, ;Ai g. Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Noittil of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Building Department Your Concise Remarks: Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department 0 i HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY LEGAL DEPARTMENT MAYOR A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 •Fax 288-2501 Robert D. Corrie CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Keith Bird (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Tammy deWeerd City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 •Fax 888-6854 Cherie McCandless TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Noittil of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Building Department Your Concise Remarks: Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department 01/03/01 09:18 $208 323 9336 J -U -B ENG. BOISE 4 6 GENERALINT 1 2 4 5 Name of Address, Owner(s Address: Telephor Applicar. Address: Telephor Engineer Address: Tcicphon 7-71,- :13B4t F 3.a:b-916E-rr.al.1: Nainc an_l -i;11 t. rccei.ve Cit F_:I1_::.�s- _ urs _ �J��J �'�LS►r1f�U - Addxess --6 abrv� Tcleohor_e: CITY OF MERIDIAN' PlanninI- &Zoning .Department 200 E. Carlton Avenue, Suite 201, Meridian, ID 8.33642- (208) 3642(208) 884-5533 Phone i (208) 888-6854 Fax )RRQl!)rST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT (RE: Meridian Subdivision Ordinance — 12-3-1 thru 12-3-6) 2002/003 PRELIMINARY PLAT FEATURES 1. Acres: 99 • Z.75 2. Number of building lots:xg 3. Number of other lots:? 4. Gross density per acre: 5. Net density per acre: 6. Zoning Leis*.rict(s). E:_fisting: °r -posed: (2-A 7. Does the plat border a potential green be'? or Pathway?�u� s. Have recreational easements been provided for?(� 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City? Explain 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Explain For future parks? _bl . Explain 1.1.. What school(s) service the area? Do you propose any agreement_ for fut re school site,,.?_ oihm 12. Are there any ol... r tcoposed. arnen:!ies to the City? _explain 13. Type of building (residential, commercial, industrial, Office or combination): 14. 'type of dwellincy(s) (single family, duplexes, multiplexes, other):_jw k Rev. 10126100 JA,' 1.__, --I1 e9: 2= 20= 323 9336 =�aE. C2 r �• j I I n J . �- PY _ T- Y Y Y Y Y Y ✓ Y M cl�l � m.t €) • !n .. Y �I� � � � �f � !t �.t�j t tw �j e . t �L�•' !• !•Yf-Yf- , g e , ! ..sit , ! I NOORB'24'E N01�9'10'E � � I e ,Y e - e • e Y # � ! • !� ! _ f � � t I. t. w ,Y a .■ Y Y : t�tn,. j 251.01 10-&78 /� t g= g r I �• I t° - - y� :r9 ...E I j t �te a �I m, ■ 0'• t ! 9 i ,xa5 ------Jim jNMM'10'E °ee.e9' j3§ t ° .,....: " ems■ ° Yf t, gt'M �gt•_ al of e P.. i t ' t ' t • tt - t . t C,Y t ,tl o��� , e �° `..° � ! I ,Y , t�t p a t. C € ■ t t� i € p i t�gG g�ttr, I' t `' ^'.� a"ge ■ t I�t . tt a' '_ems__ , j �g■.go t `gt- � '''+"''`" 'L■ tt',' I�t■ t�•' �� p_r -- I mlt a g� t = tgW f � 1 =4 ■","' ~ pia r - t" � � j■ r s p P 't ` - - s �c Ot t t ■ t C "; }6 a - .i� AZ P.. Y / e • •• t i � I I L I It ■t!I a °et�� t� t � ° , s'• f�- !' f`' I j g ;tjl !• r• a' tI 52> 17 ji, p �, a ,... • �' �' i jS0071'23'W 200.39 t ■ t e t ! • . ! - f -d f • . , k ■� I fQq a � � �■ �' t... i n � "' � I — W � w ueniouu mono • K 3 Y g c� �P a� 8� P P l Y 9 y P TT g Y i [ La F $gg� g gg s 1 99 g11C1� gpg f AwE I r 4 g Q [ P • a 6 y 3�i! e g a 3� 3�$'g of �$ J U -B ENGINEERS, l— m°�ro®.E� m•• PRELIMINARY PLAT �ama9n>zN� Poe .�" CEDAR SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION n■ ram, xwo°■ �roea KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION t ggg wa■� m.-m-�aw . L MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO fJu Engineers Surveyors Planners December 29, 2000 Brad Hawkins -Clark City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 400 Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Cedar Springs Subdivision Resubmittal Dear Brad: Per your email of December 28, 2000, 1 am sending along 30 copies of the revised preliminary plat, one 8 '/z x 11 copy of the revised preliminary plat, and one set of conceptual engineering drawings. The boundary as dimensioned on the original submittal has not changed nor has our rezone request. In a nutshell the revisions include a reduction in the number of buildable lots by 58 lots (from 326 to 268), the addition of a potential limited office site on the east of 3.39 acres, the addition of a 12 acre school site on the west, and the addition of a potential multi -family residential site on of 5.52 acres, also on the west. We have not requested an amendment to our rezone request and are seeking an R-4 designation for the entire site. We will seek an appropriate zoning designation and/or detailed conditional use approvals for the school, office site and multi -family site as those plans are finalized in the future. I have sent an amended plan to the Highway District along with the necessary revisions to the traffic study. No major modifications in their requirements are anticipated. We appreciate your consideration of our amended request and are available to meet at your earliest convenience should you have questions or concerns. Sincerely, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. azzc:) Daren S. Fluke, AICP Planning Associate DSF:Ihc cc: Kevin Howell U:\dsf\cedarsprings\resubmittal-doc 0 0 SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET Proposed Development Name Cedar Springs Residential Subdivision File No. PP -00-018 Date Reviewed 1/11/01 Preliminary Stage XX Final Engineer/Developer J U B Engineers, Inc/Kevin Howell Development The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Ada County Street Name Ordinance. The following street names shall appear on the plat: " N. MERIDIAN ROAD " " W. USTICK ROAD " " N. VENABLE LANE " The following street names are approved for this plat: " N. GREENWICH WAY " " N. PRICE WAY " " N. ELSINORE WAY " "N. BYRON PLACE " " N. STANFORD AVENUE " " W. ASHBY DRIVE " " W. ALEXIS DRIVE " " N. FRANDON AVENUE " " W. BLAKE STREET " " N. THAIN AVENUE "IJ �r W GT. "-WALESTER PLAeE " " W. ANTON DRIVE " " W. ASHTON DRIVE " " N. BARRON WAY " , -PL.. "-W. STAUNTON eiftRfi " " W. WELCH STREET " " W. CORNELL COURT " " N RHODES AVENUE " and " N. PORTAGOVENUE 1 The above street name comments have been read and approved by the ollowing agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, "NCY REPR SENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priester Community Planning Assoc. Sherri Pil City of Meridian Meridian Fire Dept. Cheryl Sable Date4 44— Date I"�t-ot 4A Date Representative ) L, n Date _1:-Z5-- U 1 NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Subindex Street Index 4N 1W 36 Section BERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS NUM ., TR%SUBS1Small Cities.FRM Attn TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: ���(Al Q Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No.: PP -00-018 Request: Preliminary Plat of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department D rt nt Your Concise Remarks: Fire epa me Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department 0 VALLEY • HUB OF TREASURE LEGAL DEPARTMENT MAYOR A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 Robert D. Corrie CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Keith Bird (208) 888-4433 •Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Tammy deWeerd City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 Cherie McCandless Attn TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October 2, 2000 Transmittal Date: ���(Al Q Hearing Date: October 10, 2000 File No.: PP -00-018 Request: Preliminary Plat of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department D rt nt Your Concise Remarks: Fire epa me Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department tft REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL Sep f d� PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT,/ y Cle�eO f. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1 es4$ TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerk's possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month that the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P. M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision: Cedar Springs 2. General Location: Northwest of N. Meridian Rd. /West Ustick Rd. 3. Owners of Record: Leslie Family Trus t/Moore Family Trust. Address: 1185 Osprey Ridge Rd., Eagle, z.ip 83616 Telephone 383-4302 4. Applicant: Kevi n Howell Development Address: 1087 W. River St.. #250. BoisZip X70 _Telephone 381-4302 _ 5. Engineer: Matthew B. Schultz Firm: _j-a3Fnir_TNFFRC_ Inc 6. Name and address to receive City billings- Name: Kevin Howell Address 1087 W. River St., #250, Boise, 83702 Telephone 383-4302 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres: 99.83 2. Number of building lots:—3 33 3. Number of other lots: 25 4. Gross density per acre: 3.34 5. Net density per acre: 4.48 6. Zoning Classification(s): R4 7. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification? RUT 8. Does the plat border a potential green belt? No 9. Have recreational easements been provided for? Yes -Homeowner Open Spaces 10. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City? No Explain Site is adjacent to future city park. 11 12 13 14. 15. 16. 0 Are there proposed dedications of common areas? No Explain Homeowners Association will own maintain common areas. For future parks? No Explain CitY park immediately adjacent o site. What school(s) service the area? Meridian Do you propose any agreements for future school sites? No Explain The school district has —adpquate sch.00l sites in the area. Are there any other proposed amenities to the City? Explain Bike path Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination): Residential Type of Dwelling(s) (Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other): S.F. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s): 8,000. Sr b. Minimum square footage of structure(s): 1401 SF C. Are garages provided for? Yes Square footage: 300 I SF d. Has landscaping been provided for? Yes Describe: At entryways, common areas, detention basins and public accesses to park. Yes e. Will trees be provided for? Yes Will trees be maintained . f. Are sprinkler systems provided for? Yes NA g. Are there multiple units? No Type: Remarks: NA h. Are there special set back requirements? No -Explain: NA i. Has off street parking been provided for? Yes Explain: Residential Av.4 vo1.iavc j. Value range of property: k. Type of financing for development: Conventional 1. Were protective covenants submitted? Yes Date: 17. Does the proposal land lock other property? No Does it create Enclaves? No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. Development will connect to City services. 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. 9-604 B PRE -APPLICATION MEETING The developer shall meet with the Administrator prior to the submission of the Preliminary Development Plan. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss early and informally the purpose and effects of this Ordinance and the criteria and standards contained herein, and to familiarize the developer with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and such other plans and ordinances as deemed VMI".M. PL'mL rJ-U-B,A boupoar r ` -neers Surveyors Planners q°1.& x-- Project: 11644 Date: July 19, 2000 KEVIN HOWELL - MERIDIAN PROPERTY PARCEL 2 AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 (COMBINED) (Revised Per a Fence Line Adjustment) Parcels of land being portions of the SE Y4, Section 36, T.4N., RAW., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a found 1/2" iron pin marking the Southwest corner of said SE Ya, Section 36 (South 1/4 corner), THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°19'43" East 462.63 feet (formerly South 89°20'51" East), along the Southerly line of said SE 1/4, Section 36, and along the center line of Ustick Road, to a set 5/8" iron pin and cap marking the most Southwesterly corner of those lands excepted from Parcel 1, as it is described in Quitclaim Deed Instrument No. 99123670, Records of Ada County, Idaho, from which corner a found 3 -Ya" Ada County Engineer Aluminum Cap, monumenting the Southeast corner of said Section 36 bears South 89019'43" East, 2,199.57 feet, as shown on that certain Record of Survey No. 4958, recorded April 21, 2000, as Instrument No. 100030102, Records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said Southerly line and said center line North 00028'24" East, 258.01 feet along the Southerly extension of a an existing North-South fence line, to a slight angle point in said fence line; thence North 01°18'10" East, 105.78 feet along said fence line; thence North 01'59'18" East, 79.41 feet to an angle point in said fence; thence South 88°35'37" East, 4.11 feet along an East-West fence tine to a found 5/8 inch iron pin and cap PLS 8248, being an angle point in the Westerly boundary of said excepted lands from Parcel i of Instrument No. 99123670; thence continuing South 88°35'37" East, 129.61 feet along a jog in said Westerly boundary of those excepted lands, to a found 1/2" iron pin; thence North 01°25'10" East, 886.69 feet (formerly North 01 °24'08" East, 886.62 feet), along said Westerly line of those excepted lands, to a set 5/8" iron pin and cap, marking the Northwest corner of said excepted lands, being a point on the Southerly line of the N'/2 , SE 1/4, Section 36, from which point a found 1/2" iron pin marking the SE 1/16 corner of said Section 36, bears South 89°14'39" East, 52.99 feet (formerly South 89° 15'45" East); thence South 89014'39" East, 1,596.37 feet (formerly South 89°15'45" East 1,596.29 feet), along said Southerly line, to a found 5/8" iron pin marking the Northeast corner of a parcel of land, as it is described in Book 181 of Deeds at page 67, Records of Ada County, Idaho; thence South 00°51'23" West, 200.59 feet (formerly South 00°50'16" West), to a found 5/8" iron pin marking the Southeast corner of said parcel of land Book 181, page 67; 9 0 T- 'Ineers Surveyors Planners Parcels 1 B 2 (Combined) July 19, 2000 Page 2 thence South 89°10'45" East, 435.10 feet (formerly South 89'12'23" East, 435.18 feet), to a found 5/8" iron pin marking a point on the Westerly right-of-way of Meridian Road; thence North 00°51'23" East, 1,526.17 feet (formerly North 00°50'16" East) along said Westerly right-of-way, parallel with and 25.00 feet distant from the Easterly line of said SE 1/4, Section 36, to a set 5/8" iron pin and cap marking a point on the Northerly line of said SE 1/4, Section 36, from which point a found 5/8" iron pin and cap marking the Northeast corner of said SE 1/4, Section 36 (East 1/4 corner) bears South 89009'38" East, 25.00 feet; thence North 89109'38" West, 2,655.40 feet (formerly North 89° 10'42" West), along said Northerly line, to the Northwest corner of said SE Y4, Section 36 (Center 1/4 corner), from which corner a set 5/8" iron pin and cap (a witness corner), bears South 00027'49" West, 15.00 feet; thence South 00°27'49" West, 2,657.96 feet (formerly South 00°26'40" West), along the Westerly line of said SE Y4, Section 36 to THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing an area of 99.83 acres, more or less. END OF DESCRIPTION Prepared by: J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. STSy� 182 8 0 r \oP� '�• ySA UL GN�QQ , JPG:gar John P. Gnipp, P.L.S. F:\projects\11644\legals\parcell-2 revised.doc • • FILE COPY BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN C/C 06-05-01 IN THE MATTER OF THE REMAND ) CASE NO. PP -00-018 TO PLANNING AND ZONING FOR ) ORDER OF THE APPLICATION OF CEDAR SPRINGS) REMAND TO LOCATED NORTHWEST OF MERIDIAN) PLANNING AND AND USTICI� ROADS j ZONING BY: J -U -B ENGINEERS, INC. This matter having come before the City Council on April 17, 2001 and continued until June 5, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m., at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, and the Council having received the Recommendations from Planning and Zoning, correspondence from Berry Peters, J - U -B Engineers, Parks and Recreation Commission and Staff, Chief William Gordon, and Fire Chief Kenny Bowers, and additionally having heard testimony at the June 5, 2001 meeting from Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Tom Kuntz, Parks and Recreation Director, Fire Chief Kenny Bowers, and the testimony from Matt Schultz and Gary Lee both from J -U -B Engineers, and John I(ennedy, owner of property adjacent to the northwest corner of the proposed Cedar Springs, and due to inconsistencies in the preliminary plat, and being fully advised in the premises issues the following Decision and Order. ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO PLANNING AND ZONING PP -00-018 w DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING ORDER OF REMAND TO PLANNING AND ZONING Based upon the above and foregoing correspondence, testimony, and inconsistencies in the preliminary plat, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER THAT: The decision of the City Council is based upon the grounds there are inconsistencies in the preliminary plat, and such plat shall require the following: 1.1 Applicant shall be required to supply access for John Kennedy's property, the neighbor to the west, and note said access by the applicable stub street on the plat. 1.2 Applicant shall remove from the plat the future L -O and multi -family references if they are not intended to be planned development. 1.3 Applicant shall design a new single loaded street along the park on the southern boundary of the proposed subdivision, and additionally it shall address any safety issues within the plat. 1.4 Applicant shall design the lots to be of various sizes to add diversity within the subdivision. 1.5 Venerable Lane shall be vacated on the latest plat, and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall address what they want covered and what they want done with this lane. 2. This matter is remanded back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further action in accordance with this decision. ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO PLANNING AND ZONING PP -00-018 2 i 0 NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the remand of the preliminary plat may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. BY action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the q�!d ay of �u�-f– .2001. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN ANDERSON Voted_4 COUNCILMAN BIRD Voted—*OL-1 COUNCILWOMAN DEWEERD Voted—� COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLESS Voted_$fL-_ MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (Tie Breaker) Voted DATED: MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO PLANNING AND ZONING PP -00-018 3 Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and the City Attorney. B Dated: City Clerk Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360NI\Cedar Spgs PP00-018 Remand PP back to P &-Z\0rderRemandingN?�j?"' 0 1 8.doc ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO PLANNING AND ZONING PP -00-018 02/09/2001 11:32 2088885052 SANITARY SERVICE HUD OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Goad Place to Live Kahert D Corric CITY OF MERIDIAN t'I1.1 C'OI,NC t(. %ILMBLRS 33 FAST IDAHO Ron Anderson MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Keith Bird (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 Tammy dewccrd City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Chene McCandlcss Meridian School District LEGAL DEPARTMENT (209) 2R8•2491) - f:is _'+Ss..501 PUBLIC w()KKN BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) SS7.221 I - Fax 897 1207 PLANNING AND 7.0NIN6 pEPARTMENT (los) 884.5533 - Pas 988.6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: cEebruary 1, 200 File NO: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell North of Ustiok Road and West of Meridian Road Location of Property or Project; Sally Norton, PIZ Meridian School District Bill Nary, PIZ Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Jerry Centers, PIZ Ada County Highway District Richard Hatcher, PIZ Community Planning Assoc. Keith Borup, PIZ Central District Health Robert Corrie, Mayor Nampa Meridian Irhg. District Ron Anderson, C/C Settlers Irrigation District Tammy deWeerd, C/C Idaho Power Co, (FP/PP) Keith Bird, C/C U.S. West (FP/PP) Cherie McCandless, C/C Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Water Department Ada County (Annexation) Sewer Department Idaho Transportation Department Sanitary Service Building Department Your Concise Remarks. -� Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Resaential Applications oniy) ■_�,.ww `;qn • 26 PPIFP/PFP • 30 AZ • 27 )7 FEB - 9 2001 CMffMMDMS CITY OF MERIDIAN FEB 09 '01 11:49 2088885052 PAGE.04 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: North of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Your Concise Remarks: r? /—/ S' 0 / - W le j/; S /'Q AJ - City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 RECEIVED JAN 16 2001 City of Meridian City Clerk Office 0 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live Robert D. Corrie CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 33 EAST IDAHO Ron Anderson MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Keith Bird (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 Tammy deWeerd City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Cherie McCandless LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: North of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Your Concise Remarks: r? /—/ S' 0 / - W le j/; S /'Q AJ - City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 RECEIVED JAN 16 2001 City of Meridian City Clerk Office TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: North of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Resides Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department RECEIVED JAN 11 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN 9 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: North of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Resides Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department RECEIVED JAN 11 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that vour rrm^^^^`c o„M ivw�rinfullucz It�f�a iiTiii :. .'-hv_the Meridian Planning -... and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Mendiarrclity ,' :=” Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Come, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer North of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications ony) Gen - 26 PPlFPIPFP - 30 AZ - 27 RECEIVED JAN 10 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN L MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY 9 A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 23, 2001 Transmittal Date: January 5, 2001 Hearing Date: February 1, 2001 File No.: PP 00-018 Request: Revision of Preliminary Plat PP 00-018 from 333 building lots to 326 building lots, 1 limited office lot, a 12 -acre school lot and a potential multi -family residential site By: Kevin Howell Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Reside Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 North of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department 3VEC� JAN - 8 2001 J � emo C.QN-3,n, cltty�:,rfe�e®dian fico To: Kristy From: Brad Hawkins-Clark"'L'&O- CC: Shelby, Shari !'2 JqA�, ofd Cleril dl4 o Date: 01/03/01 Re: Cedar Springs Subdivision - Revised Preliminary Plat Application (File #PP -00-018) Kristy, As you probably recall, Cedar Springs Subdivision (JUB Engineers/Kevin Howell) requested deferral at the 12/12 P&Z Commission hearing in order to revise their application. They are now slated for the 1/18 P&Z meeting. I received their revised application last week. Since it is such a significant revision to their original application, I told them we would need to re- circulate the plat and application cover sheet to all the standard agencies. I also told them the hearing date will be changed from 1/18 to 2/1 to give us time to receive comments back, etc. So, could you please mail the enclosed plat and application to all the regular agencies/City departments/Staff and request any revised comments they may have? Also, please copy the 8'/2 x 11" version of the plat and Daren's cover letter to the P&Z Commission, Public Works and us. There are no changes to the Annexation application or to any other part of their original application, so this should be all the agencies/departments need in order to make their revised comments. Also, please note the change of hearing date for the 1/18 P&Z agenda. Finally, please make sure the property owners within 300' are sent a new notice and revised plat showing the new school and office sites. Thanks! Brad 0 Page 1 0 Will Ber From: Shari Stiles [sti less@ci. meridian. id. us] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:41 PM To: Steve; Brad H -C; Bruce F.; Gary; William G. Berg Jr. (E-mail); Shelby Ugarriz (E-mail) Subject: FW: Cedar Springs Annexation & Preliminary Plat —Original Message— From: Gary Lee [mailto:GAL@JUB.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:59 AM To: 'stiless@ci. meridian. id. us' Cc: 'smithg@ci. meridian. id. us'; Matt Schultz; 'khinvest@aol.com' Subject: Cedar Springs Annexation & Preliminary Plat Shari: This project is up for P&Z Commission meeting next Tuesday (12/12/00). We have not yet completed the site plan revisions to incorporate the school site and other mixed uses. Also, I have been waiting on a response from Gary Smith to see if the City will let us proceed with the annexation and preliminary plat in light of the fact that the White Sewer trunk is not yet constructed through Kevin's property. Kevin has willing to risk the timing on the trunk line vs. starting his project. If the construction of the trunk line does not happen within a timely manner, it would simply mean that his preliminary plat would expire, or, be subject to a time extension. We would therefore like to request that this item be tabled until the Jan. 9, 2001 planning & zoning meeting. We will make an attempt to submit the revised plan to staff for review within the next few days. Please call me to discuss, if you have concerns. Gary A. Lee, P.E.,L.S. J -U -B Engineers, Inc. 208-376-7330 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on October 10, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Kevin Howell for Annexation And Zoning of 110.71 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision; Furthermore, the applicant also requests Preliminary Plat approval of 333 building lots and 25 other lots on 99.83 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision generally located northwest of Meridian Road and Ustick Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 18th day of September, 2000 WILLIAM G. B�RJR. Y ERK PUBLISH September 29, 2000 and October 6, 2000 4�j `32AL / p . 0l.rEi�°� ' AAAA