HomeMy WebLinkAbout2-18-04 letter from PinnacleRECEIVED-,_.
FEB 8_ 20
,1
PMACLE
City of Meridian
IgM eery � In (city
.iClerk Office
�D r f the ri" i Ci 'Council "
TQ: MayoX eWeerd and Members Me d an ty
33`East Idaho Avenue
Meridian, ID x813642
DATE: February 10 2004
I
RE:Saguaro Canyon Estates Recommendations
— Dear Mayor_ and Council — - —"- — -
A'fter,reviewing the recopunendation of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission we have
prepared th'e following responses to the conditions, found' in thce recommendation.
nd
Annexation:Recommetions(AZ-03-027)a
r
r
A. Commission
-
I Applicant agrees.
2., 'Applicant "asks that this condition be removed. This, condition requires a secondary
access to be constructed on site r-i,o 't_b the lssuan
c
e,of a building'permit, mit for'the 236
to
lot within the! subdivision, This requirement
was, not 'eque'sted by the Fire
Department for safety reasons, I nor was; it (requested by ACRD for traffic flow
acquirements related to the traffic' study "prepared for this subdivision at build lout.
The traffic study[and ACHD agree that ^a secondary,' access is not. warranted forthis
subdivision and the prior condition satisfies the fire access issue. A secondary access
will more than likely be createdby,'the: dcyelopment of the ,adjacent land, with' _
connections to the stub -streets' ,, provided 'within '- Saguaro' 'Canyon._ - n The ! -
recommendation puts the developer of the property at the mercy of the adjacent land
pers to provide secondary -
owners/developers bnda access when one is not warranted. I -If this
I remains a requirement„ we ask that the paving requirement be 'removed from the
recommendation because the pavement for the access will ultimately be toM out
when the actual rgadway is constructed.-'
�3. -Applicant agrees -
R. Planning and Zoning Staff Recommendation's_,(reviscd)
I. A licantg�-a ree .
p -
p
2:, Applicant 'agrees, however the Public Works Department has indicated that a new -
well 'and -septic system shall be permitted for the, construction 'of a new' single family
w septic stem and well
dwellingon the Bo ick' parcel Lot34. Black 2� . The he system . Y p � )
P.
12 W
2 . EXECUTIVE DR�IVB SUITE B BOISE, IDAHO - 8
55 � 8 71 208. 887 7760 • FAX 208 887 77 ]
3 3 ( ) ( )
C036316 Comm Ronse Le[te� 021004
esp
�access for fire will be,Provldedand is not,�egwred-to bepaved inorder to meet.
Fire Dep artment'standards.
4.
Applicant agrees.
B. -Planning
1
and Zoning Staff -
1.
Applicant an
PP g
2.
Applicant agrees.
3.
'A Applicant a' rees, and, requests that 'ono fence be required along; the McMillan
PP g , q q. g
fronlageif the landscape berm is over eight feet in height.
- - 4.-
--A'pplicane:�&- — - --� - - - - — --'
i
5.
J Applicant agrees, and will address this issue again for the. City Council.
6.
Applicant agrees, however -a 10''',ywide asphalt pathway, has been approved, by -
ACHD on the McMillan frontage in'lieu, of a'standard concre'te'sidewalk.- \;
7.
Applicant agrees, with- the, exclusion of the proposed septic and well for the
Boyack parcel. `-
8.
Reyise the c'onditiori to read as follows: I
f n � f.„ 7 l..r .,7.,..7,,.. ,
Trion to CCE o I Meridian approval 0 the 51 �8 =
t1' f pP
buildin ermi
-lei t...
RP i
Additionally, we request thatthe'second paragraph be removed or revised, as
noted above, in regards, to the secondary access road.
9.
Applicant agrees, and'aequests the following modification:
,Add Fire Department tutu -around requirements as submitted,' approval,of well ,
and septic for. one, single family- dwelling' and require a different subdivision name
for the final plat of the Boyack. property because it will not contiguous'to phase 1"
'
of Saguaro Canyon (per Ada Count requirement). -
10.
Applicant agrees, and will address issue at City Council hearing.
11.
'Applicant agrees, however, the 6' detached sidewalk portion of the pathway will
notmeet the'ParksPathway�standards. Please revise this comment accordingly.
12. '
Applicant willcorrectplat.
r
13.
Applicantagrees.
i
C0363 16 Comm
I'
Response Getter 021004
,