Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-05-28E 1D~~1`~ %-,~, CITY COUNCIL AMENDED MEETING AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 7:00 PM 1. Roll-Call Attendance X David Zaremba X Brad Hoaglun X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Community Invocation by Stephanie Moore with Ten Mile Christian Church 4. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted 5. Consent Agenda Approved (Pg 2-4) A. Approve Minutes of May 7, 2013 City Council PreCouncil Meeting B. Approve Minutes of May 14, 2013 City Council Workshop Meeting C. Approve Minutes of May 7, 2013 City Council Meeting D. Mini Heavy Equipment Rodeo Agreement with Cesco for Public Works Week Expo 2013 E. Public Parking Agreement with RWP Meridian, LLC for Public Works Week Expo 2013 F. Professional Services Agreement with High Street Entertainment for Musical Talent for Concerts on Broadway Performance on June 22, 2013 for the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $2,500.00 G. Acceptance Agreement: Display of Artwork of Theodore Smith in Initial Point Gallery from May 31, 2013 to July 2, 2013 H. 2013 CableONE Movie Night in Meridian Presenting Sponsorship Agreement Between the Saint Alphonsus Medical Group and the City of Meridian for aNot-to-Exceed Amount of $2,000.00 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda - May 28, 2013 Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. I. Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement to Schmidt Construction for "NW 8th Street Sewer Trunk Main Phase 1 -Broadway to Cherry" for the Not-To- Exceed amount of $363,826.72 J. Approve the Release of an Existing Sewer Main Easement with Steve Bainbridge and Dave Conley that was Previously Recorded as part of the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Franklin -Ten Mile to Linder Project K. Approve the Revised Sewer Main Easement with Steve Bainbridge and Dave Conley for a Sanitary Sewer Main to their Property as part of the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Franklin -Ten Mile to Linder Project L. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Approval: MDA 13-009 Walmart Overland/Stoddard by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Located Southeast Corner of W. Overland Road and S. Stoddard Road Request: Modification to the Development Agreement to Change the Fencing Type Along the Southern Boundary of the Site from Eight (8) Feet Tall Vinyl to Eight (8) Feet Tall Pre- cast Concrete M. FP 13-023 Irvine by Northside Management Located Southeast Corner of W. Chinden Boulevard and N. Ten Mile Road Request: Final Plat Consisting of 40 Single-Family Residential Building Lots on Approximately 8.84Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning District 6. Items Moved From Consent Agenda None 7. Action Items A. Public Hearing: TEC 13-003 Bellingham Park Subdivision by Conger Management Group Located Approximately 1/4 Mile East of S. Locust Grove Road and Approximately 1/4 Mile North of E. Amity Road Request: Two (2) Year Time Extension on the Preliminary Plat for Bellingham Park Subdivision in Order to Obtain the City Engineer's Signature on a Final Plat Approved with Conditions (Pg 4-10) B. Public Hearing: VAR 13-002 Knighthill by James Wylie Located Southwest Corner of Chinden Boulevard and N. Linder Road Request: Right-In/Right- Out Access Point to State Highway 20/26 (Chinden Boulevard) Continued to June 4, 2013 (Pg 10-11) C. FP 13-022 Accolade Subdivision by Idaho Survey Group Located South of E. Overland Road and West of S. Bonito Way, Between E. Blue Horizon Drive and the Ridenbaugh Canal Request: Final Plat Consisting of One (1) Multi-Family Residential Building Lot and One (1) Common Lot on Approximately 11.23 Acres of Land in an R-40 Zoning District Approved (Pg 11-12) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda - May 28, 2013 Page 2 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 8. Department Reports A. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project and Activity Prioritization for Program Year 2013 (Pg 12-18) B. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY2013 for the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $55,000.00 for Wastewater Consulting Approved (Pg 18-20) C. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY2013 for the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $77,000.00 for Waterline Extensions Approved (Pg 18-20) D. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY2013 for the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $130,000.00 for Well 15B Test Well Approved (Pg 18-20) E. Mayor's Office: Budget Amendment for FY2013 for the Not-To-Exceed Amount of $2,871.00 for the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council Fundraiser for Ben's Bells Approved (Pg 20-21) 9. Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 13-1558: An Ordinance for the Annexation of a Parcel of Land Located North of Chinden Boulevard, South of Phyllis Canal and Approximately 112 Mile East of N. Black Cat Road, Commonly Known as Heron Ridge Estates (AZ 13-002) Approved (Pg 21-22) 10. Future Meeting Topics None Adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda - May 28, 2013 Page 3 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m., Wednesday, May 28, 2013, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Charlie Rountree, David Zaremba, Keith Bird, and Brad Hoaglun. Others Present: Bill Nary, Jaycee Holman, Caleb Hood, Warren Stewart, Scott Colaianni, Perry Palmer, Robert Simison Steve Siddoway and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Roll call. X David Zaremba X Brad Hoaglun X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: Well, I'd like to welcome all of you to our City Council meeting. It's always nice to see certainly the Boy Scouts that do come down here. We hope you're as interested in this material as we are. I won't guarantee it, though. But welcome and thank you all for being here. For the record, it is Tuesday, May 28th at 7:00 p.m. We will start with roll call attendance, Madam Clerk. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance De Weerd: Item No. 2 is our pledge and tonight we will be led by Troop 128. They are with the Meridian Stake 2nd Ward and I believe that Jacob Smith is going to lead us and I will just wait and have them instruct us on what we need to do. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) De Weerd: If I could ask you young men -- I do have a City of Meridian pin that I'd like to give each you for leading us. Thank you so much. And for just surviving the meeting we will get you young men some pins, too. And that doesn't mean you have to stay to the very last minute. So, thanks again for joining us. Item 3: Community Invocation by Stephanie Moore with Ten Mile Christian Church De Weerd: Is Stephanie here? I didn't think I saw her. Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda De Weerd: I will move to Item No. 4, adoption of the agenda. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 2 of 23 Hoaglun: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: One item of change on tonight's agenda. Under Action Item 7-B, the applicant is requesting that this be continued to June 4th of this year. And under Ordinances, 9-A is Ordinance No. 13-1558. With that, Madam Mayor, I move adoption of the agenda as amended. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as amended. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 5: Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of May 7, 2013 City Council PreCouncil Meeting B. Approve Minutes of May 14, 2013 City Council Workshop Meeting C. Approve Minutes of May 7, 2013 City Council Meeting D. Mini Heavy Equipment Rodeo Agreement with Cesco for Public Works Week Expo 2013 E. Public Parking Agreement with RWP Meridian, LLC for Public Works Week Expo 2013 F. Professional Services Agreement with High Street Entertainment for Musical Talent for Concerts on Broadway Performance on June 22, 2013 for the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $2,500.00 G. Acceptance Agreement: Display of Artwork of Theodore Smith in Initial Point Gallery from May 31, 2013 to July 2, 2013 H. 2013 CableONE Movie Night in Meridian Presenting Sponsorship Agreement Between the Saint Alphonsus Medical Group and the City of Meridian for aNot-to-Exceed Amount of $2,000.0 Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 3 of 23 I. Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement to Schmidt Construction for "NW 8th Street Sewer Trunk Main Phase 1 - Broadway to Cherry" for the Not-To- Exceed amount of $363,826.72 J. Approve the Release of an Existing Sewer Main Easement with Steve Bainbridge and Dave Conley that was Previously Recorded as part of the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Franklin -Ten Mile to Linder Project K. Approve the Revised Sewer Main Easement with Steve Bainbridge and Dave Conley for a Sanitary Sewer Main to their Property as part of the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Franklin -Ten Mile to Linder Project L. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Approval: MDA 13- 009 Walmart Overland/Stoddard by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Located Southeast Corner of W. Overland Road and S. Stoddard Road Request: Modification to the Development Agreement to Change the Fencing Type Along the Southern Boundary of the Site from Eight (8) Feet Tall Vinyl to Eight (8) Feet Tall Pre- Cast Concrete M. FP 13-023 Irvine by Northside Management Located Southeast Corner of W. Chinden Boulevard and N. Ten Mile Road Request: Final Plat Consisting of 40 Single-Family Residential Building Lots on Approximately 8.84Acres of Land in an R-8 Zoning District De Weerd: Item 5 is our Consent Agenda. Hoaglun: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: No changes on our Consent Agenda, so I move approval of the Consent Agenda and the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: Motion and second to approve the Consent Agenda. Madam Clerk, will you, please, call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 4 of 23 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 6: Items Moved From Consent Agenda De Weerd: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. Item 7: Action Items A. Public Hearing: TEC 13-003 Bellingham Park Subdivision by Conger Management Group Located Approximately 1/4 Mile East of S. Locust Grove Road and Approximately 1/4 Mile North of E. Amity Road Request: Two (2) Year Time Extension on the Preliminary Plat for Bellingham Park Subdivision in Order to Obtain the City Engineer's Signature on a Final Plat De Weerd: So, we will move into Item 7-A, which is a public hearing on TEC 13-003. will open this public hearing with staff comments. Hood: Thank you, Madam Mayor. I'm pinch hitting tonight. Not Raul Ibanez as we referenced last week, but I will try to make you on base and cover it nicely for Bill anyways in staff's presentation of Bellingham Park time extension. The subject property consists of 11.5 acres, currently zoned R-8 in the city. This is the third time extension requested for the subject plat and therefore, it requires Council action. There are three new -- excuse me -- four new conditions that we -- that staff is recommending be included with the original conditions of approval for this project. They have to do with revised performance surety policies, the warranty surety policy, our new street lighting standard and Public Works has a condition, the applicant needs to be responsible for extending a 21 inch sewer trunk line to and through development. I do have a letter back from the applicant saying they are in agreement with the new conditions of approval contained in the staff report and with that, Madam Mayor, I will stand for any questions you may have on this time extension. De Weerd: Thank you, Caleb. Council, any questions? Bird: I have none. Rountree: None. De Weerd: Is the applicant -- hi, Kent. Brown: Madam Mayor, Members of the City Council, my name is Kent Brown. My address is 3161 East Springwood, Meridian, Idaho. Brad adequately covered the conditions that have been added and we are in agreement. We have an engineer under contract and he's designing plans and it's -- they haven't been submitted. They will be Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 5 of 23 soon. To my understanding at least from Conger Management. So, stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Bird: I have none. Rountree: I have none. Brown: Thank you. De Weerd: This is a public hearing. Is there anyone who would like to offer testimony on this item? Okay. If you will, please, come forward. I'm sorry, I didn't see your hands. If you would, please, state your name and address for the record. Either one. Howard: Good evening, Madam Mayor and Council Members. My name is Charlie Howard. I'm a resident -- address is 3010 East Deerhill Drive here in Meridian. I actually live in the Tuscany Subdivision and had some questions and comments and concerns about Bellingham and the plat number four that I'd like to raise and Ihave -- there are additional homeowners that may have some other items they would like to talk about. As we looked through some of the information that's been provided through a conscientious search on our parts as homeowners in the Tuscany Subdivision, we come across some of the information that relates to Bellingham that you may or may not know. Bellingham and Tuscany as designed in this current plan actually meet and intersect at the intersection of Deerhill, which would be on your map kind of the upper right-hand side of your map. I don't have a plat in front me. At one time it was called Rainwood Drive. It's been amended, apparently, to be Deerhill Drive, which is a continuation of a street that's part of Tuscany and, then, also part of Bellingham. What we had concerns about in our neighborhood, among other items, are there was a traffic study done for Bellingham that's on file with the city, dated July 22nd, 2004. On that traffic study it does not include any of the interfaces that go towards the interior of the neighborhood. As you may know, Tuscany has some nice amenities, including the Sienna Middle -- Sienna K through six elementary school, as well as a city park. So, there was no study done on the effect of traffic flowing through -- well, the traffic study itself only talks about traffic flowing out of Bellingham, not through Bellingham into Tuscany and down the street of Deerhill where I reside. So, I would respectfully request that part of this extension include a new traffic study for the city to be able to undertake or the developer to undertake, so that we can understand the impact of traffic on our street. The effect it will have on home ownership, as well as safety concerns. That's one of the straightest paths through Tuscany. I don't know if you guys are aware of Tuscany, but most of the streets are fairly curved. This one is not, because it's along the Ridenbaugh Canal -- in that area. So, it's a pretty straight shot and so there is some definite safety concerns among the homeowners and so would also request that -- that that be considered, that that street not actually continue between the two subdivisions. Maybe the developer can recover another lot for sale -- for resale, but allow maybe a pedestrian path or bike access. Thank you. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 6 of 23 De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Rountree: I have none. Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Appreciate your testimony. Additional testimony? You would need to say it on the public record. Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Scott: My name is Roger Scott and I live at 2374 East Deerhill Drive. De Weerd: Thank you. Scott: Just up the street from Charlie. Charlie came to me maybe a week or two ago about his concerns. I was unaware of the connection that was going to be made between the two developments. When I purchased my home I may have not -- I had a lot of things going on. I was getting married. I had a new job and building a house, so my initial concern wasn't necessarily what was going to happen in the future and looking forward I should have done that, because there was this connection. I believe that our street will become -- you know, more traffic flow on our street, as well as our -- I believe it will affect our housing property values and my wife and I are planning to have children in the future and we have children living across the street. A lot of children play on that street, as well as many other streets in the neighborhood, but I think Charlie stated it pretty well, but just wanted to voice my concern. De Weerd: I appreciate that. Any questions from Council? Rountree: I have none. De Weerd: Thank you very much. Any other testimony? Yes, sir. Good evening. Gerving: My name is Josh Gerving. I live at 2320 East Deerhill Drive and I don't have anything further to stay, I just want to concur with the two previous gentlemen and give my support for them. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Sorry to make you come up here. Schoenfeld: No. No. Tamara Schoenfeld, 4105 South Marsala Avenue and I live on the corner of Deerhill and Marsala. I also concur with what they have stated and we would like to see at a minimum if there could be a new traffic study completed and -- to try and address some of our concerns with the interior traffic flow. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you very much. Caleb, do you want to explain what can be asked from Council during a time extension request, what the city can consider. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 7 of 23 Hood: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, it is a final plat. As it stated there is a traffic impact study. Certainly you can -- anything that's in our current code you can certainly require the applicant. We do, in concurrence with ACHD, require traffic impact studies for large projects. Quite honestly, with the information, if you were to go that route and do a traffic study to see what the implications may be -- as you know, we don't control all of the traffic, so that really would be to the benefit of the highway district if there is any benefit to looking at a traffic study. But it is within your purview if you wanted to -- some time has elapsed -- almost ten years since the traffic impact study. It certainly is in the realm of possibility for you to continue this out to have the applicant do a traffic impact study. I don't think that that's the right thing to do in this instance, but it is certainly something that the Council could potentially do. Again, Madam Mayor, the only thing in current code requires -- traffic impact studies are something that originally was part of this project and another option -- again, not something I would recommend necessarily, but you could deny the time extension, that makes them go through the whole process again. That is one of the reasons to have a time extension and to have this is when time elapses between a project being approved and getting recorded. If the community has changed that is an opportunity to reevaluate to see if it's still the right project in the right location. So, again, not something Iwould -- if you asked me that I would necessarily recommend, but that is something that is on the table for Council to consider. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Just in looking at the display which is on the screen for everybody to see and in front of us as well, the existing subdivision, the street that they are talking about is a stub street and while we don't control the streets, Ada County Highway District does, they intentionally put stub streets where they expect a connection to be made. If that were not a stub street it would have a cul-de-sac turnaround big enough for a fire truck and trash trucks and so forth. Clearly they intended that to be a connection through and the advantage of having multiple connections is that it spreads the traffic out. The more dead ends you have the more difficulty it makes for traffic to get around and the more difficult traffic is on the few remaining streets that receive the traffic. So, I would not be inclined to say that we need a new traffic study. That actually is the purview of Ada County Highway District, but I would say the decision has already been made that that stub street will connect -- will be a connectivity and I personally wouldn't change that. De Weerd: Thank you. Council -- Kent. Sorry. I almost forgot to give you the last word. Brown: Again for the record Kent Brown, 3161 Springwood. I'm in a unique situation here, because I have actually represented both subdivisions. I did the design for all of Tuscany. I did all of the design for the portion that they are talking about in Messina Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 8 of 23 Meadows, which required a traffic studied of us. It was also interesting at P&Z and City Council that we also came before this body at that time -- at the same time. So, it was anticipated -- this hasn't changed. It's always been this way. We stubbed at this location and it was coordinated so that -- as you can see from our plat, you enter from the southwest side of Bellingham Four and we cross the creek at that location. There isn't any other connection that crosses the creek and so we have one way in on the west side and we have one way out on the east side, connecting to the stubs that have been provided between the two. It was also interesting that the two engineering firms that were doing that -- I was working with one and, then, went to work for the other, but they coordinated so that they were locating the stubs at the right location. Bellingham actually came in first. They had to do some redesign stuff and Messina Meadows that these folks live in was just a little bit ahead of it, but when it came to being at the hearings, the Council, the Commission, there hasn't been any change, it has always been the same, so it wasn't even a space of six months it was -- they were at the same hearing being approved. So, hopefully, that answers the question. Typically ACHD takes ten vehicle trips for every single family residential lot and, then, they are going to split them trying to decide which direction they are going to go and the local streets take a lot more access. It will be different than what these people are used to on a dead end street in that location, but it won't tax that road too much, so -- I will stand for any questions. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Are you aware of whether or not the typical barricade is in place on the end of that stub street? Brown: There is not a sign that says that it will be extended in the future. Zaremba: It does have the sign that says -- Brown: It does not. De Weerd: No, it doesn't. Zaremba: It does not have it? Okay. Brown: It does on the Bellingham side, but not on the Tuscany side, to my knowledge -- recollection. Hoaglun: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 9 of 23 Hoaglun: But I tried to do a count here, but -- there is going to be, what, 47 homes in this -- Brown: Thirty-one. Hoaglun: It's an odd shaped -- Brown: Triangular piece. Hoaglun: -- triangular piece. Yeah. Rather unusual. And it looks like the main access, then, would be off South Locust Grove, as you said, East Wrightwood Drive and, of course, we always require a secondary accesses for emergency vehicles in case there is one that's blocked off, we require that as part of the city code, so there would definitely have to be two, so -- Brown: The park was a part of that original application and the school had already previously been located and so those would have been calculated in those traffic numbers also. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you, Kent. Council, any further information you need from the applicant, staff, or any of the neighbors? Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I move we close the public hearing on TEC 13-003. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 7-A. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I move we approve TEC 13-003 with the four conditions added by staff. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 7-A. Council, do you have any discussion? Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 10 of 23 Rountree: Madam Mayor, just a comment with respect to the traffic. That was looked at and Kent did a good recall of what went on in the planning of the subdivisions out there. It's unfortunate that it all doesn't get built at once, but we were fortunate in this instance that it all got planned together. Those roads are there and meant to go through to provide continuity and connectivity in neighborhoods. These folks who will live in this area will want to utilize the park, they will want to go west through another neighborhood. And, likewise, the neighborhoods on either side will commute back and forth. So, that's part of what we try to do in looking at transportation systems within these large blocks of development, to connect them to the communitywide resources and institutions that are there and connect them amongst their neighbors. I think we -- again, Iwill state again I think we were fortunate when we looked at this whole section together and to me I'm glad to see it finally come to completion. De Weerd: I think that one thing that has happened since this all transpired is those dead end streets, we have asked ACHD to start signing them that they will be extended in the future, because I don't think a lot of homeowners did realize that and so we started making those a condition. But I think that was far after this development was -- was approved. So, any further discussion from Council? Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. B. Public Hearing: VAR 13-002 Knighthill by James Wylie Located Southwest Corner of Chinden Boulevard and N. Linder Road Request: Right-In/Right- Out Access Point to State Highway 20/26 (Chinden Boulevard) De Weerd: Item 7-B was requested to be continued to June 4th. So, I will go ahead and open the public hearing on VAR 13-002 and entertain a motion to continue to June 4th. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we continue VAR 13-002, public hearing to June 4th, 2013. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to continue this public hearing to June 4th. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 11 of 23 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. C. FP 13-022 Accolade Subdivision by Idaho Survey Group Located South of E. Overland Road and West of S. Bonito Way, Between E. Blue Horizon Drive and the Ridenbaugh Canal Request: Final Plat Consisting of One (1)Multi-Family Residential Building Lot and One (1) Common Lot on Approximately 11.23 Acres of Land in an R-40 Zoning District De Weerd: Item 7-C is final plat 13-002. I will ask for staff comments. Hood: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Again, this is a project that Bill Parsons wrote the staff report for, but I will give the presentation this evening. The -- excuse me. The application that's on your agenda is for the final plat. I will just let you know that there is a private street application that is also tied in with this -- this project. This is an 11.23 acre site, zoned R-40, located south of Overland, west of Bonito Way and between Blue Horizon and the Ridenbaugh Canal. The proposed final plat consists of amulti-family lot and a common lot. The Accolade Subdivision was approved by the City Council on February 7th, 2012. Council also approved the CUP that allowed the lot to develop with 276 multi-family units. The proposed common lots, per the landscape facade include part of the common lots developed with Gramercy Subdivision No. 1 and as I mentioned a private street proposed within the project. The internal connectivity is the same as the preliminary plat. The number of building lots is the same. Common open space is the same. And staff finds that the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the project that Council approved in 2002. Similar to the last project, we also have a written correspondence from the applicant stating that they are in agreement with the conditions as proposed in the staff report. With that, Madam Mayor, I'd stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you, Caleb. Any questions from Council? Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Is the applicant here? We do have a letter that they agreed with staff's report. Council, any further information you need on this item? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve FP 13-002 and include staff comments and the letter from the applicant. Rountree: Second. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 12 of 23 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve this item. Any discussion from Council? Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 8 Department Reports A. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project and Activity Prioritization for Program Year 2013 De Weerd: Item 8-A is under our CDBG. I will turn this over to Lori. Den Hartog: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. I'm here tonight to present recommendations from the Community Development Block Grant scoring committee and going over kind of the preliminary stage to our annual action plan process. So, for the upcoming program year, which is program year 2013, which is scheduled to begin on October 1, our estimated entitlement amount is 243,000. We have not received notice from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development what our grant amount will be for the coming year. Based on the information that we have preliminarily received from HUD we are estimating a five percent reduction from our current year's allocation. If that number is different as we move forward, I may come back to Council and if it's up or down and request some additional guidance and direction from you, depending on what that final number will look like and based on the estimate our public services are capped at -- they are always capped at 15 percent, so our estimated allocations for public service type projects is just over 36,000. Administration is capped at 20 percent. Ten percent was last year. Staff is recommending an allocation of 18 percent, which is approximately 43,000. Our application process involved a workshop where we invited past applicants and potential future applicants to come to the city and meet with staff to discuss possible projects and what types of projects would fit in with the city's plan for use of these grant dollars. So, applicants are required to submit a full application. The projects were scored and ranked by an internal scoring committee. They were scored on the following: The goals and outcomes of the proposed projects. The need in the community that the project addressed. How the organization plans to carry out their proposed projects. Their capacity to do that. And how the project would or would not meet the goals and objectives of the city's consolidated plan, which is our five year plan for use of these dollars. And just a refresher, the national program goals and objectives are to provide decent, safe, sanitary housing, provide a suitable living environment, to expand and participate in economic opportunities. The national objectives of the program are to benefit low to moderate income persons, to aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight and to meet an urgent need. The city's consolidated plan, we have three main strategies to improve access to affordable housing opportunity for Meridian residents, Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 13 of 23 to support services, programs and projects for the city's low to moderate income residents, including persons with special needs and residents at risk of homelessness. The first strategy is to improve economic opportunities in the city's LMI areas. So, with that I'd like to cover the applications that we received this year. We received four applications, so four requests for projects that fell under the public service category. The requested total was just over 101,000 dollars. And, again, available funding is just over 36,000. So, substantially less than what was requested. Based on the applications that were submitted and the scores that those applications received, the committee recommended partial funding for two of those submitted applications. I'd like to briefly go over the four applications that we received and, then, the recommended funding level. And so we received an application from the Meridian Food Bank to purchase food and that food would be distributed through the facilities down on Broadway to hungry families and to children in need in Meridian. The second application was from the Boys and Girls Club in Meridian, a scholarship program. They requested 25,000 to provide scholarships on a sliding scale based on income levels for programs that are fee based at the club. So, these programs are the Summer Early Risers program, the Meridian Sunshine Club, and the Meridian kindergarten program. These programs cost an additional amount above and beyond the club membership dues, which are pretty low for the annual fees and they provide an important service to working parents, particularly before and after school or during the summer. The Salvation Army. This was a new application that we received this year. We have never had the Salvation Army apply. They applied for case management for the Finally Home rapid rehousing program of homeless families. The Finally Home program is a transition in place program for homeless residents. The Salvation Army operates this program within the City of Boise. They have experienced some good success with it. They are moving away from the model of having homeless shelters and providing housing first and, then, intensive case management for homeless individuals that need. assistance. It's an approach to ending homelessness that's had some good success. And, then, finally, the last application that we received was from Open Lines Training for the senior job training and placement program. This is a program to provide job refresher and training and job placement for Meridian seniors. We did fund this project last year and they are having some success with their project this year. Based on the scores that we did receive and the estimated amount that we have, staff has -- or, excuse me, the committee is recommending a funding level of just over 26,000 dollars for the Meridian Food Bank and 11,000 dollars for the Boys and Girls Club. The Boys and Girls Club requested 25 -- as you can see the request is -- both of these agencies have indicated they can make use of any amount of funds that we would be able -- that we would be able to provide through this grant. For the nonpublic service application we received seven requests for a total of just over 262,000 dollars. Based on the other caps and things that we had, the available funding for these types of projects is just over 163,000. Have a little bit of a unique situation this year for our nonpublic service applications. Based on the scores that the applications received the scoring committee recommended funding on only two of the applications for a total of 120 -- just over 127,000 dollars. So, you see that that's less than what we have available and I will provide an explanation along the way as we discuss these projects. So, the first few applications that we received were from the Meridian Parks and Recreation Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 14 of 23 Department. The first for a restroom facility at Centennial Park for 91,000 and the second for a picnic shelter at 8th Street Park for just over 36,000. Those are both pretty straight forward projects. The third application we received was for Liberty Housing Service for an application and rehab and at the request of 25,000, they have not proposed this project to us before. It's a project that they currently operate. They have other funding sources that they utilize. The way that they propose the use of the 25,000 was to be combined with other funds that they had to purchase one single family home in Meridian to rehab that home and to sell it to an eligible low to moderate income family. One of the -- there is a couple of reasons that the scoring committee did not recommend that application for funding. It opens us up to the possibility of program income, which is something that greatly increases our administrative oversight and time into the future for tracking and things like that and some of it is -- some if it is a little bit of a learning curve, but need something we can continue in discussion with Neighborhood Housing Services. They have other funding sources to operate this program. They haven't implemented it in Meridian yet. They are currently doing acquisition and rehab type projects in Boise, but that may be something we continue to explore with them in the future. The next two are ones that you're familiar with. Both Neighborhood Housing Services and Ada County Housing Authority applied for down payment assistance. These funds, as you know, are used to provide an additional source of down payment funds for low to moderate income families purchasing a home in Meridian -- anywhere in Meridian. These two applicants, because of the current market that we are in, and the tightening of credit and the type of applicants that they are receiving it's been more difficult for the folks that they are assisting to receive -- I just totally lost my train of thought. Sorry. To obtain a loan and, therefore, to utilize the down payment assistance. So, the other part of that that we have had some carryover funds from both of these -- from both of these activities from previous years. We have funded the down payment assistance program each year that we have had our grant. Neighborhood Housing Services has 21,000 remaining in their line of credit with us and Ada County Housing Authority has just over 27,000 remaining in their line of credit with us. So, there is still funds available for those entities to carry out the down payment assistance program. The committee thought that it would be good to maybe take a year off from that, let them get those funds spent and, then, reevaluate next year if they decide to reapply. A little bit of the same situation with the next application. That was from the Meridian Development Corporation for the fapade improvement program. They have requested 30,000 dollars. Two years ago we allocated 40,000 dollars to this program. The Meridian Development Corporation has took a little bit of time to get this project off the ground. They are making progress. To date they still have 39,000 in their line of credit and that can be a little bit -- a little bit deceptive. They have other projects underway and the way it works is the property owners go out and get the -- get the work completed, they pay for it, they wait for reimbursement from MDC and, then, MDC waits for reimbursements from us. So, there is a little bit of a time lag. In their current agreement with MDC they have to have all of their existing funds at least allocated, they don't have to be spent, but they have to be allocated by July 1 of this year. In conversations with their program manager, Ms. Ashley Ford, she stated that they thought they could reach that goal and have all of their existing funds allocated. So, the scoring committee similar to the two down payment assistance programs, we Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 15 of 23 thought it would be good to get those funds spent and to see those entities use what they have existing and, then, perhaps to reevaluate in a future year. And, then, the last application that we received was the Meridian Development Corporation submitted an application for 10,000 dollars for way finding signage and this would be to design and install signs in the downtown core area consistent with MDC's plans. This application did not score high enough to receive funding and one of the primary reasons for that was it wasn't particularly clear how it met a national objective or one of our five year plan consolidated goals. So, that's a little bit about each of those applications. One of the things that I wanted to talk to you about -- and it was certainly a concern of our scoring committee and as far as you can see the two projects that we have recommended for funding are to projects submitted by our Parks and Recreation Department. So, the committee was concerned about the perception that we have other folks applying and that we are funding two city projects and looking back over the years -- over the six years that we've had the grant of the nonpublic service applications it has not been unusual. The types of -- the other applicants that we have funded are the ones that you can see before you be funded, projects through MDC and, then, we funded the down payment assistance program and other than that all of the other projects have been city projects and part of that is the nature of the projects that qualify for the nonpublic service applications. By the very definition most of them are undertaken by a government entity or aquasi-government entity. So, that is certainly -- that's certainly part of it. And the other component is the housing projects that other cities may undertake with -- with these grant dollars. Frankly, our grant isn't large enough to do -- to undertake some of those other types of projects. So, while our committee has concerns about that, we still felt that -- that our recommendation was solid based on the applications that we received and the scores that those applications received, at least for this year. And, again, that doesn't preclude any of these applicants from applying again in future years and that was certainly -- that was certainly the feeling of the body at that time. So, what we are left with is an interesting situation that we haven't had before. Based on our estimate, then, with the two projects that were recommended for funding, we have remaining 36,000 dollars. So, there are a couple of options that can go to option two as I start drafting our annual action plan as we move forward. One of the options -- and I have had discussions with Nampa and Boise how they handle this when they don't have a specific project at the time of the drafting their action plan, they have stated that they identify a general type of project and come back at a later date with specific options. So, that is one option before you this evening for the remaining funds of approximately 36,000. So, one option would be to draft the annual action plan, stating that we will construct one public facility improvement project in the LMI area and, then, come back to Council at a later date, probably by December or January, which is usually when we get our grant funds anyway. With a couple options for Council to consider. So, some of those types of projects they could include water and sewer project design, could include public art, sidewalk construction, street lightening and I don't have anything specific at this time, this is just to give you a flavor for what we could possibly spend the dollars on. And we would propose working with other city departments and other agencies, through ACHD, MDC, and other public entities to see if there is something that maybe we can collaborate on and propose and work together. And there are options that Council can direct me to this evening. If there Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 16 of 23 is another application that the committee didn't recommend for funding, if there is one that Council feels like we could fund with those remaining funds. So, that's an option as well. So, I know that's a lot to take in and I usually don't talk this much when I'm before you, but with that I'm happy to stand for any questions. I will quickly cover our process moving forward. On June 20th is when -- after the action plan is drafted is when the public comment period will open. That opens with notice in the newspaper and I will e-mail out anyone that has been involved in our action plan and has requested a copy of that and, then, we will have a public hearing on July 23rd regarding that annual action plan and, then, I will send it on to HUD after that. So, happy to stand for any questions that you may have. De Weerd: Thank you, Lori. Any questions from Council? Councilman Zaremba. Zaremba: Madam Mayor. First, thank you for all the effort that you and the committee put in to organizing this complicated thing and presenting it in away that it's understandable. I appreciate that. As a suggestion to do with the unassigned funds, is it possible -- might it be wise to just say that we are going to hold those in case the grant turns out to be minimized, either by the sequester or some other government activity that says, oh, by the way, you're not going to get as much as you thought you were going to get and might it be wise for us to just not assign that money and say if, in fact, we get it, then, we will look for something else. Is that a possibility? Den Hartog: Madam Mayor, Councilman Zaremba, that was a question I raised with Boise and Meridian, too, to ask have you ever not allocated all of your funds, you know, what do you do and their response was you have to allocate it, but we could -- if we set it up in something where we don't have a specific project, because it's a public facility and the other ones we are recommending for funding are public facilities, if those go over budget we could use those funds, it would be consistent with how we would identify the use of those and maybe it's not for a specific project, but it's for a public facility to benefit our LMI residents. So, I think there is a couple of parameters that we would need to be clear about. I think we can't leave it too vague, you know, there is certain parameters I think that we certainly want to lay in our action plan so the public is clear that, you know, we will be doing some kind of project. And, again, what -- because it's not specific and because we haven't done this type of thing before, my recommendation would be to come forward in a public setting like this when we have some options, so that the public has a chance to consider the specific activities that we might be choosing from. Again, I don't have anything in mind at this point, but your thoughts. De Weerd: Lori, right now I know the planning division is looking at our streets and I -- I think that can play into it. Certainly I think your list was well constructed in terms of some of the needs in our -- in the areas of interest. In particular I know there is some safety lighting concerns. Certainly connected sidewalks -- I don't -- sidewalk construction is huge in particular in this area and as we look at our safe routes to school this last fall we had some requests that I believe that Ada County Highway District was able to mitigate, but we can look at some of those areas as well. Oh. And I think that Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 17 of 23 Councilman Hoaglun with the construction of Meridian Road and the location of Meridian Elementary and seeing that that will be a much wider, busier roadway, HOC signals might be something north of Pine that might be warranted as well. So, any of those areas certainly have probably some need associated with them. Council, any other comments? Council Member Hoaglun. Hoaglun: Madam Mayor. Lori, the public service projects are limited to 36,500 total; correct? Den Hartog: Correct. Hoaglun: And the Food Bank was recommending 26,500 and Boys and Girls Club 11. Is that going to be ten? Den Hartog: Yeah. Sorry. That doesn't add up. I apologize. Hoaglun: So, was that 10,000 to the Boys and Girls Club or 11,000 and 25,000? Den Hartog: I think the Meridian Food Bank was 25,500. I apologize. And the Boys and Girls Club at 11,000. Hoaglun: Okay. Den Hartog: Thank you -- Hoaglun: Yeah. Den Hartog: -- for my number correction. De Weerd: Anything further from Council? Rountree: That answered my question. De Weerd: Okay. Very good. Well, thank you, Lori, and we will look forward to the update. When do you generally get the award letter? Den Hartog: It's a little late in coming this year. When I e-mailed about a week ago they said it was coming out anytime, so with the federal government we don't always quite know. So, I'm hoping soon and I really am hoping that we will have it before publish the draft action plan, so that that will have some more firm numbers and I think that will make a difference and if it's substantial one way or the other in my estimate, I may come back before you for some additional direction, depending on what that number looks like. De Weerd: Very good. Well, thank you so much. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 18 of 23 Den Hartog: Thank you. B. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY2013 for the Not-to- Exceed Amount of $55,000.00 for Wastewater Consulting C. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY2013 for the Not-to- Exceed Amount of $77,000.00 for Waterline Extensions D. Public Works: Budget Amendment for FY2013 for the Not-to- Exceed Amount of $130,000.00 for Well 15B Test Well De Weerd: Item 8-B is our Public Works -- actually 8-B, C, D. So, Warren, it's all yours. Stewart: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Do you want me to address all three of them in a row? De Weerd: Yes. Bird: Yeah. Stewart: Thank you. The first budget amendment that -- is Item B. First of all, I want to make note that you have an informational memo associated with that. You also have the actual budget or amendment request. The amendment request has some modified numbers that have been handwritten in there. Those are correct. So, the handwritten -- or the memo that's along with that is incorrect by -- I think it's 15,000 dollars and the reason for that was there was -- actually, Finance had more money in that budget than we thought we had. So, we are going based on the numbers from our database and once the amendment went through the process we discovered that there was actually some additional money available in that and so this -- this request is going to go down a little bit from 70,000 that was on the memo to 55,000. So, 15,000 dollars less. And 40,000 of that, just to dive right in, is reprogrammed money or reallocated funding from water line controlling funds. Every year we have some money available in that fund and this year it does not appear that we are going to have projects that will utilize all of that money, so we'd like to reallocate that and, then, ask for 15,000 additional dollars and it's going to go to three different locations, essentially, or three different pieces of work that we have ongoing. One is the NPDES emitting or technical assistance we have going on and, essentially, that's most directed at this present time to the TMDL -- the phosphorus TMDL on the Boise River and what we have control doing for us to represent our interest in that. Secondly, there is some money that needs to be allocated to -- including the design of the reclaimed water pipelines in the Franklin Road project from Ten Mile to Black Cat. It's not planned to be built until 2015, but we need to get the design in there now, because the plan -- ACHD is moving forward to complete those plans and put them on the shelf for that project. We will, we hope, have some more information on the NDPES permit and what that's going to mean to the City of Meridian before that goes to construction and, if necessary, we could pull that from that project at that time. But it's easier to pull that from the project at the last minute than it is to try Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 19 of 23 and scramble to get that information in the plan. And, then, thirdly, there is wastewater treatment plant frontage improvements and this is, essentially, excuse me, related to the RV dump facility that we are putting in out there. We are relocating that. But as a part of that, if you have been out there -- I know you have -- and, then, tried to -- you're coming southbound on Ten Mile Road and you got a big RV on and you're trying to pull into the wastewater treatment plant. That is a near impossible corner to take. There is a big concrete irrigation head wall right there that's very difficult and sort of dangerous to get in and sometimes we have people stop and have to back up and so forth. So, along with this project and along with the two new building projects that we have got going on out there, we would like to reallocate some funds to design a new entryway, make that a little more open, a little more accessible. If we are going to allow RVs to come in there and use that, we'd like to have a safer, better entrance for those RVs to get into the facility and also include some signage and some fencing associated with that. So, that's what this amendment's for. De Weerd: Warren, will that help mitigate -- I know this winter when it was so slick out just the employees going to work with that open ditch right nearby was a little bit scary on occasion. So, will that correct that? Stewart: It will certainly help, because the entrance will be made wider, it will be easier to get off of Ten Mile Road -- slow down and get off of Ten Mile Road out of the road of traffic that's continuing up and down Ten Mile Road. So, it will definitely improve the entrance. The concrete structure is going to have to be moved back a ways, so it will be further off Ten Mile and so -- and there is going to be fencing put in there at the entrance, so if they were to run into something they would run into the fence before they would end up in the ditch. De Weerd: That would be good. Stewart: So, to that extent, yes. Any questions? Okay. Moving on. Item No. 2 -- or amendment number two is a request to reallocate funds to a water line extension from Well 17-B -- well, every year we do two well -- essentially assessments and allocate money for reconstruction of two wells. This year we did Well 17 and Well 15 and I will talk about 15 in just a moment. Well 17 actually turned out when we did the -- the assessment of Well 17 it turned out it was in pretty good shape and we didn't need to spend a lot of money getting it cleaned up and rehabilitated. So, we had a little money left over and we want to reallocate that money to water line extensions to help with the project out on Locust Grove south of Victory to extend a water line south to a new development that's going on out there. It's going to be part of the work that the city is going to be responsible for doing. So, that's what this project is primarily for and any questions on that one? Okay. Moving on. The last budget amendment is for 130,000 dollars, a portion of which I believe is reallocated funding and a portion of which is new and, essentially, what this amounts to is Well 15 was the other well that we assessed and we are going to reconstruct. We did the assessment on Well 15 and determined that it was actually in -- unlike 17, it was in such bad shape it didn't make any sense to rehabilitate that well and so we need to start the process to actually redrill a new well Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 20 of 23 adjacent to it. Well 15 currently has issues with high manganese and iron and so we would like to drill a test well first and test the geology, as well as the water quality at different aquifer levels and determine the b new well and so this money is going to be preparation for designing a new Well 15. ;st location to, essentially, isolate or put the used to drill that test well and put that in in De Weerd: Thank you, Warren. Council, any questions? Rountree: I have none. De Weerd: Okay. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move to approve Items 8-B, C and D, budget amendments not to exceed 55,000 dollars for wastewater consulting, budget amendment in the amount of 77,000 dollars for water line extensions, and a budget amendment in an amount not to exceed 130,000 for rehabilitation -- or for Well 5-B test well. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Items 8-B, C and D. Any discussion from Council? Madam Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. E. Mayor's Office: Budget Amendment for FY2013 for the Not-To- Exceed Amount of $2,871 for the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council Fundraiser for Ben's Bells De Weerd: Item 8-E is a budget amendment under the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council and Robert will provide you some information on that. Simison: Thank you, Mayor and Council. I asked Ken to be here tonight, but apparently it's game seven and his San Jose Sharks are playing, so I let him off the hook and told him I would go for him tonight. What you have before you is a budget amendment which is the result of the efforts of the Ball at the Hall, which was the ticket sales, as well as the silent auction items which comprises the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council annual fundraising event that they did for Ben's Bells. So, the budget Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 21 of 23 amendment you have before you is for 2,871 dollars, which would be a donation to that organization for the group's efforts and I will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Bird: I have none. Hoaglun: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun. Hoaglun: I move approval of the budget amendment in the amount of 2,871 dollars for the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council fundraiser from that to -- for Ben's Bells. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-E. Madam Clerk, will you call roll? Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9: Ordinances A. Ordinance No. : An Ordinance for the Annexation of a Parcel of Land Located North of Chinden Boulevard, South of Phyllis Canal and Approximately 112 Mile East of N. Black Cat Road, Commonly Known as Heron Ridge Estates (AZ 13-002) De Weerd: Item 9-A is Ordinance 13-1558. Madam Clerk, you will, please, read this ordinance by title only. Holman: City of Meridian Ordinance No. 13-1558, an Ordinance AZ 13-002, Heron Ridge Estates, for annexation of a parcel of land being a portion of southwest one quarter of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as described in Attachment A and annexing certain lands and territories situated in Ada County, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, as requested by the City of Meridian, establishing and determining the land use zoning classification of said lads from RUT, and R-1 in Ada County, to R-2, Low Density Residential District, in the Meridian City Code, providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County assessor, the Ada County recorder and the Idaho State Tax Commission as required by law and providing for a summary of the Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 22 of 23 ordinance and providing for a waiver of the reading rules and providing an effective date. De Weerd: Thank you. You have heard this ordinance read by title only. Is there anyone who would like to hear it read in its entirety? Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: Seeing none, I move that we approved Item 9-A, Ordinance 13-1558 with suspension of rules. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 9-A. All those -- oh, I'm sorry. Madam Clerk, roll call, please. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 10: Future Meeting Topics De Weerd: Council, any topics to set on future agendas? Nary: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I just wanted to give you an update that we have the ordinances next week for you for the changes to the Council structure, including the additional Council seats that were approved in the election from a week ago. So, those will be on your agenda, I'm just giving you a heads up about that. De Weerd: I think Madam Clerk had sent out an a-mail earlier that the vote had been -- Holman: Canvassed. De Weerd: -- canvassed. Okay. If there is nothing further I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Rountree: So moved. Meridian City Council May 28, 2013 Page 23 of 23 Bird: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED At 8:02 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) l ~ ~ / ~3 MAYOR T Y DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTEST: MAN, CITY CLERK O~PZED AUGLS~ ¢~ 1 ~; js ~ ow cat,, of E 10~ tAN f®AHO ;4 ~ J r~~e ~ ~~yr ~~P 6q ~~ the THE ~5~0