Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStrickland Subdivision CUPJanuary 12, 2004 CUP 03-063 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING January 15, 2004 APPLICANT Roy Strickland ITEM NO. 7 REQUEST Public Hearing -Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a medical office building in a proposed OT zone for proposed Strickland Subdivision - 1225 Main Street AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: K-e C O~ m~ ~"`' CITY ENGINEER: ~ ~- v ""r CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See atfathed Staff COmmenf3 ~ ~ I G CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: See attached Comments CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: No Comment CITY PARKS DEPT: No Comment MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See attached COmmenfs CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See attached Comments NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: I ,, J Contacted: Date: ~ ' I Phone: '~~ ~ ~`J~J Emailed: Staff Initials: Moterlals presented at pubilc meetings shall become property of the Clty of Merldlan. 1; MAYOR ,- LEGAL DEPARTMENT Tammy de Weerd (208) 46&9272 Fax 466-4405 CITY OF ' ..~ CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ~~~ 1~~~ PUBLIC WORKS Keith Bird {//F! BUILDING DEPARTMENT William L.M. Nary V (208) 898-5500 ~ Fax 898-9551 Shaun Wardle IDAHO Charles M. Rountree ~' PLANNING AND ZONING '`RC ~ DEPARTMENT 4'hgp , . _ „y (208) 8845533 ~ FAX 888-6854 MEMORANDUM: Transmittal Date: January 9, 2004 Hearing Date: January 15, 2004 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission R ~1 From: SteveSiddoway,AssociateCityPlanner 'c""-~~~~~ Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer j A',' ? 3 2004 r,~, Re: Strickland Chiropractic t;ity Of Meridian Cite Clerk Office • Request for a Rezone of 0.85 acres from R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) to O-T (Old Town), by Roy Strickland (File No. RZ-03-012) Request for Preliminary/Final Plat approval of a Two (2) Lot Subdivision on 0.85 Acres in a Proposed O-T Zone, by Roy Strickland (File No. PFP-03- 006). Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a new Multi-Tenant Medical/Office Building 16 in a Proposed O-T Zone, by Roy Strickland (File No. CUP-03- 063). We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modifed or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Roy Strickland, has requested approval of rezone of 0.85 acre from R-15 to O-T. The Comprehensive Plan depicts the subject property as Old Town, in harmony with the requested zoning designation. The applicant also requests a conditional use permit (CUP) for a light office/medical building. Professional offices and medical clinics are all conditional uses in the Old Town zone. The proposed preliminary/final plat will split the lot in two. The existing lot fronts both Meridian Road and Main Street. The proposed medical/professional office building is proposed to front along Meridian Road. Per staffs request, the applicant has placed the building along the street, with parking in the rear accessed by the adjacent alley. ACHD has approved this configuration. Street trees are placed in a parkway between the curb and sidewalk, similar to the existing trees along Main Street. There is an R~03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Slrickland.RZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 2 existing home fronting toward Main Street that is not being modified by this application. A CUP will be required to convert the home to office or commercial use in the future. This report contains several special considerations for the Commission and Council. Upon resolution of those items, staff recommends approval of the project with the conditions noted in this report. LOCATION & SURROUNDING USES The subject property is located north of Washington Avenue, between Meridian Road and Main Street. The following uses sunound the subject property: North -Existing Residence, zoned R-15 and gift shop, zoned C-C. South -Existing Residences, zoned R-15 and karate studio, zoned C-C. East -Meridian Post Office, zoned R-15. West -Existing Residence, zoned R-4 and Allstate Insurance, zoned L-O. OWNER OF RECORD The owner of record is Lynn M. Hamilton, who has given consent for the applicant to submit the requested applications. STANDARDS FOR ZONING AMENDMENT The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment (11-15-I1): A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive plan amendment; Staff finds that the requested Old Town (O-T) zoning designation is in accord with the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map, which delineates the subject property as "Old- Town". The text of the Comprehensive Plan (page 99) supports a variety of uses in the O-T zone, including offices. In addition, it states, "In order to provide and accommodate preservation of the historical character, specific design requirements may be imposed. Pedestrian amenities would be emphasized: ' B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be re-zoned in the future; Staff finds that the proposed re-zone and accompanying development plans comply with the requested zone and staff does not anticipate that the property will be rezoned in the future. C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning; RZ-03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Strickland.RZPP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 3 Stafffinds that the applicant has submitted detailed development plans for a Conditional Use Permit for the property. Staff further finds that the proposed multi-tenant office use will only be allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit in the proposed O-T zone. D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned; Staff finds that the recent adoption of the City's new Comprehensive Plan has provided the applicant with the ability to request the O-T zone for the subject property. Much ofMeridian Road has already redeveloped from residential to office or commercial uses. E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed development is designed in a manner that will be harmonious with and appropriate in appearance with the existing neighborhood and intended character of the area. Staff is pleased that the applicant has placed the parking in the rear of the building, with new detached sidewalks along Meridian Road. F. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Staff finds that the requested rezone should not be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. Through the comp plan process, the City determined that compact, infill development is appropriate for the area. Any future use of the property that may have a significant impact on the properties will require conditional use approval under current ordinances, and adjoining property owners will have an opportunity to comment. Staffanticipates that the proposed office building use will not be hazardous or disturbing to the neighboring uses. The Commission and Council should consider all public testimony, oral and written, before making this finding. G. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such service; Staff finds that the proposed uses can be adequately served by all essential public services and facilities. Drainage will need to be retained on site. RZ-03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Slrickland.RZPP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 4 H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; Staff finds that the requested uses will not create excessive additional requirements at public costs for public facilities and services. Additionally, staff finds that the proposed rezone would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. I. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff finds that the proposed O-T zoning designation of the property does not inherently allow uses that will generate activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions that are detrimental to the general welfare of the community. J. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Staff finds that the proposed O-T zoning will not interfere with general traffic patterns on any public streets. Please refer to the revised ACHD staffreport, dated December 23, 2003 for a full report on traffic issues. K Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. Staff finds that there are several existing mature trees on the site. Some will be affected by the proposed parking area. Staffrecommendsthatthe applicant coordinate the City Arborist, Elroy Huff, at the Parks Dept. for a determination on whether the trees must be mitigated for. This determination should be done prior to the next hearing on this project. L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City; Staff finds that the proposed rezone would be in the best interest of the City by allowing a property owner to make improvements to the property for re-development that would otherwise not be allowed without the rezone. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Rezonel The legal description submitted with the application is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. 2. The subject property is within the Urban Services Planning Area. RZ03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Sfickland.RZ PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 5 A Development Agreement will not be necessary with this rezone. All conditions of approval will be made as part of the plat and conditional use permit. PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the following: A. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan; Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use map designates the property as Old Town. Existing zoning on the property is Medium High Density Residential (R-15). The subject plat is intended for office development in compliance with the proposed CUP and the Comprehensive Plan. B. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; Staff finds that public services are available to accommodate the proposed development. All adjacent public roadways and alleys have been completed and accepted by ACHD. Municipal water and sewer service is existing adjacent to both lots. C. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program; Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. All required utilities are in place as constructed with previous development. D. The public fmancial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Stafffinds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services. Utilities exist adjacent to the property, as this is an infill project. The primary public costs to serve the future residents will be fire and police services. The applicant will be responsible for any required extensions of the utilities and for development of an irrigation system. E. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the Commission's attention. Staff finds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Council or Commission's attention. R~03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Stricklnnd.RZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 6 SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS - PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT All landscaping will be required per the landscape plans submitted with the application, with modifications as noted in the CUP section of this report 2. All condifions of the accompanying Conditional Use Permit application shall also be considered conditions of the Preliminary Plat. Sanitary sewer and water service to this development shall be via service line extensions from the existing City of Meridian mains adjacent to the project. 4. Correct the year of platting on the final plat map to "2004." Correct the bearing fie to the RPOB (N89°35'48 34" W). 6. The applicant has requested a variance to the pressurized irrigation ordinance. If the variance is granted, the applicant shall be subject to paying well development fees in lieu of providing a pressurized irrigation system to serve this development. Add or revise the following final plat notes: (8.) The bottom elevation of structural footings shall be set a minimum of 12-inches above the highest established normal ground water elevation. GENERAL COMMENTS-PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's approval letter for the subdivision name. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, play equipment, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 4. Sidewalks within the proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC 12-13-10- 8. 5. 100-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. Any streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. RZ-03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-D3A63 S[nckland.RZPP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 7 6. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 7. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all new off-street parking areas. All drainage water is to be maintained on-site. Storm water treatment and disposal must be designed in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources regarding Shallow Injection Wells. Please submit all updated groundwater/soils reports to the Public Works Department for review. Any drainage aeeas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water will percolate or discharge within a period of fime not to exceed 24 hours for all stones up to and including a 100-year stone event. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. 8. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that aze removed. 9. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 10. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 11. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. RZ 03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Strickland.RZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 8 STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following, and may approve a conditional use permit if they shall fmd evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3): A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces, parking, landscaping and other features as may be required by this ordinance; Staff finds that the subject property, as depicted, is lazge enough to accommodate the required parking, open spaces and landscaping required by the ordinance. The proposed medical/office building is 3000 s.f. Ordinance requires toff-street pazking space per 200 s.f for medical uses and 1 per 400 s.f. for professional office. Even as a worst case scenario, at 1 per 200 s.f. for the entire building, 15 spaces would be required. The proposed site plan shows 25 off-street parking stalls. C. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance; The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as Old Town. Staff finds that if the modifications required in this report aze done, the application will meet the requirements of the Planned Development and other Zoning Ordinances. See items A and C under Annexation and Zoning Analysis. D. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds the design concept to be compatible with the intended chazacter of the azea. See item E under Annexation and Zoning Analysis. E. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity; Staff does not anticipate that the proposed development will have an adverse impact on the surrounding property. However, the Commission and Council should consider any testimony given at the public hearings before making this finding. R~03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Shickland.RZPP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 9 F. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; See comments under Annexation & Zoning Analysis item G. G. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; See comments under Annexation & Zoning Analysis item H. H. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; See comments under Annexation & Zoning Analysis item I. I. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; See comments under Annexation & Zoning Analysis item 7. J. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. See comments under Annexation & Zoning Analysis item K. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Si>n3aee: The applicant is proposing two new monument signs along Meridian Road. The current sign ordinance is silent on standards for signs in Old Town, so the proposed signage requires conditional use approval with the subject application. The Commission and Council should review the proposed signage and determine what is appropriate for the site. Staff suggests that only one freestanding sign should be approved for the project; this would be consistent with the freestanding sign allowance in other zoning districts. The applicant should verify the location and maximum size for all signs at the hearing. Since the proposed building is a multi-tenant structure, all future signs for tenants will require conditional use approval, unless the sign type, size, and location are approved with this R~03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Stdckland.RZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 10 application. Therefore, staff strongly recommends that the applicant verify that all desired signage is reviewed with this application. The applicant intends to bring signage details to the public hearing on January 15. See Condition #3 below. 2. Rieht of Way: Staffhas verified with ACHD that no additional right-of--way will be required along Meridian Road or Main Street. ACHD has also approved of the proposed two-way configuration of the alley. 3. Irrigation: The applicant is proposing to connect to City water for theirpressurized irrigation system. If anon-potable water source is available, the applicant will be required to use it per Condition #6 on page 6. 4. Nei¢hborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on January 8, 2004. Staff recommends that the applicant report on the results of the meeting during the public hearing. 5. Existing Home: The existing home along Main Street (proposed lot 2 ofthe subdivision) has not been approved for commercial or office use and is not proposed to be changed by this conditional use permit. Only residential use is permitted in the exisfing home unfil such time as it is approved for another use. See Condition #4 below. 6. Trash Enclosure: On Sheet A.O, Site Plan, the proposed trash enclosure encroaches into the sewer easement. On sheet C-2, the trash enclosure does not appear to encroach into the sewer easement. Please verify the discrepancy at the hearing. Parking: The proposed plan shows 24-foot wide drive aisles; ordinance requires 25 feet. The plan also shows the stalls 20 feet deep; ordinance only requires 19 feet. Therefore, by shifting a foot from the stalls to the drive aisles, the layout can meet ordinance. Staff would also allow the easternmost row of parking to be only 17 feet deep, with a two foot overhang into the adjacent landscaping. See Condition #6 below. 8. Stormwater Pond: The proposed stormwater pond straddles the proposed lot line and is not completely contained on Lot 1. Therefore, since the pond appears to be intended for joint use between the two lots, staff recommends that the applicant record a joint use agreement for the stormwater pond prior to issuance of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance for the project. No landscaping is depicted for the stormwater pond. Staff recommends that the pond be landscaped in compliance with Ordinance 12-13-14-2. The landscape plan should be revised to include the stormwater area. See Condition #7 and #11 below. 9. Alternative Compliance: The use to the north of the proposed structure is currently residential. A strict interpretation of the landscape ordinance would require a 20-foot buffer between land uses. However staff supports alternative compliance for this small infill site with landscaping per the proposed plan. The Commission should consider any testimony R7.-03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Stdckland.RZPP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 11 from the adjacent property owner when making this allowance. Since the project is bringing the building up to the front with parking behind, it is eligible for alternative compliance per 12-13-18-2.G. 10. Parkwav Buffer: The proposed plan shows a five foot planter between the curb and sidewalk. Staff does support a detached sidewalk in this location.. However, after consulting with Elroy Huff, the Parks Dept. azborist, staffdesires to widen the proposed parkway from 5 feet to 10 feet to match the parkway width along Main Street. This may shift the prof ect east, but the allowances for reducing the parking stall depth per #7 above should make up most of the difference. See Condition #8 below. 11. Existin Trees: Staff met on site with Elroy Huff regarding the 7 existing trees proposed for removal near the back ofthe parking lot. He agrees that the cluster oftrees is trashy and may be removed without additional mitigation. However, the existing mature trees around the existing home on Lot 2 must be retained and protected. See Condition #9 below. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The building and site improvements shall be constructed per the approved plans with all modifications required by this report. 2. All conditions of the accompanying Preliminary/Final Plat application shall also be considered conditions of the CUP. 3. The proposed signs are approved as presented at the public hearing [with any modifications required by the Commission]. One freestanding sign will be allowed for the project as presented during the hearing. 4. The existing home on proposed Lot 2 shall remain as residential use only until approved for non-residential use. Process and conditions to change the use will be subject to the ordinances in effect at the time of application. 5. This conditional use permit shall be subject to the expiration provisions set forth in MCC 11- 17-4.B. 6. A1190-degree parking stalls shall be at least 9 feet wide and 19 feet deep per Ordinance 11- 13-4.F. The row of parking adjacent to stormwater Swale may be reduced to 17 feet deep. All drive aisles adjacent to pazking shall be at least 25 feet wide. R~03-O12, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 5[rickland.RZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 12 A joint use agreement for the stormwater pond shall be recorded and a copy submitted to the Planning & Zoning Department. The pond shall be landscaped in accordance the pond be landscaped in compliance with Ordinance 12-13-14-2. 8. The parkway buffer between the curb and sidewalk shall be widened to 10 feet. 9. The 7 trees proposed for removal may be removed without mitigation. However, all existing mature trees around the adj acent residence on proposed L.ot 2 must be retained and protected. 10. All pazking and drive aisles shall be paved for all uses, in compliance with the submitted plans. Handicap pazking spaces shall be signed and striped in compliance with Federal accessibility guidelines. 11. Sanitary sewer and water service shall be from main lines cunently existing adjacent to the subject property. 12. All exterior lighting, whether attached to the building or located within the parking lot, shall be down-shielded or otherwise altered so that the light does not spill over onto adjacent properties orright-of--way. All parking lot lighting shall be in accordance with Ordinance 11- 13-4C. 13. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in this report and Section 11- 14 ofthe City Zoning and Development Ordinance. All signage shall require separate sign permit(s). 14. All construction and site improvements shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the adopted building and fire codes. 15. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. Storm water treatment and disposal must be designed in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into a surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources regarding Shallow Injection Wells. The applicants engineer shall work with the Public Works Department on the design and location of the proposed storm drain facilities. The storm drain facility can not be approved in the current proposed location due to the existence of a City of Meridian sanitary sewer main. RZ03-012, PFP-03A06, CUP-03-D63 Strickland.RZ.PP.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council December 18, 2003 (Hearing Date) Page 13 16. Certificate of Occupancy: All required improvements must be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed development. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the required improvements (including paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid must accompany any request for temporary occupancy. 17. Revised Plans: Staff recommends that the plans be modified in compliance with this report and any additional conditions from the Commission and that the applicant submit 10 copies of all revised plans at least 10 days prior to the next hearing on this application. Upon resolution of the remaining issues raised in this report, staff recommends approval of this application with the aforementioned conditions of approval. RZ 03-012, PFP-03-006, CUP-03-063 Strickland.RZPP.CUP s 'R~!!'#~`~'~ ~"~~"' Ada County Highway District Sherry R. Huber Susan S. Eastlake, 1st Vice President Garden City ID 83714-6499 Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President Phone (208) 387-6100 David E.1Nynkoop, Commissioner FAX (2q8) 387-6391 John 5. Franden, Commissioner E-mail: tellus~ACHD.ada.id.us December 22, 2003 To: Lynn Hamitlon 1225 N. Main Street RECEDED Meridian, Idaho 83642 DEC 2 4 2003 Subject: MPFP03-0061MCUP03-063/MRZ03-012 Strickland Subdivisiori City of Meridian 1225 North Main Street City Clerk office On December 23, 2003, the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 208-387-6171 Sincerely, ~~ `V T~torr Joyce Newton Development Analyst Right-of-way & Development Services Planning Division CC: Planning & Development project file City of Meridian Construction Services Drainage Utilities Dave Bailey 1117 E. Plaza Street, Suite F Eagle, Idaho 83616 Roy Strickland 2716 Pine Flats Meridian, Idaho 83642 '~ Ada County Highway District Right-of--Way & Development Department Planning Review Divtsian This application does not require Commission action and is approved at the staff level on Tuesday, December 23, 2003. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on Friday, December 19, 2003. Please refer to-the aftachmenf for appeal guidelines. Staff contact: Joyce Newton, 208-387-6171 phone, 208-387-6393 fax, jnewton@achd.ada.id.us File Numbers: MPFP03-006/MCUP03-0631MRZ03-012/Strickland Subdivision Site address: 1225 Main Street Owner: Lynn Hamilton 1225 N. Main Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Applicant: Roy Strickland 2716 Pine Flats Meridian, Idaho 83642 Representative: Dave Bailey 1117 E. Plaza Street, Suite F Eagle, Idaho 83616 Application Information: The Ada County Highway District (ACRD) staff has received the above referenced application requesting rezone approval for 0.85-acres. The application also included a preliminary. plat approval for a two lot mixed use subdivision. The single-family dwelling and out buildings will remain on one lot with a conditional use application to construct a medical office on the remaining lot. The site is located on the west side of Main Street approximately 137-feet north of Washington Avenue. The site abuts a paved easUwest alley and has frontage on Main Street and Meridian Road. Vicinity Acreage: 0.85-acres Current Zoning: R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) Proposed Zoning: OT (Old Town District) Existing Use: Residential A. Findings of Fact Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 110 additional vehicle trips per day (10 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. 2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time.' 3. Traffic Impact Study: This proposed development is estimated to generate less than 1,000-trips per day therefore a traffic impact study was not required with this application. 4. Site Information: There is an existing residence with out buildings on the site. 5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: a. North: Commercial C-C and Residential R-15 b. South: Commercial C-C and Residential R-15 c. East: Commercial C-C and Residential R-15 d. West: Residential R-4 and Commercial L-O 6. Impacted Roadways Main Street: Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Meridian Road: Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: East/west alley: Frontage: Approximately 83-feet Minor Arterial North of Pine Avenue was 16,442 on 4-30-02 Greater than "E" 35-MPH Approximately 83-feet Minor Arterial North of Pine Avenue was 8,631 on 7-26-00 Better than "C" 25-MPH Approximately 445-feet Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site Main Street is a minor arterial roadway with two-travel lanes including a center turn lane with curb, gutter and detached sidewalk abutting the site. Meridian Road is a -minor arterial roadway with two-travel lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. The east/west alley is paved to the width of 16-feet abutting the site. 8. Existing Right-of-Way Main Street has 80-feet of existing right-of-way (40-feet from centerline).. Meridian Road has 80-feet of existing right-of-way (40-feet from centerline). The alleyway has 16-feet of existing right-of-way (8-feet from centerline). 9. Existing Access to the Site The site has frontage on Main Street, Meridian Road and an improved alley. There is one residential driveway located 5-feet north the alley. The site does not have a delineated access to Meridian Road. With approximately 445-feet of frontage abutting the alley the applicant has adequate parking area behind the residence and out buildings. 10. Site History District staff has not reviewed this site as an application or prepared a report in the past year. 11. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program Main Street and Meridian Road is not programmed into the District's current Five Year Work Program. However, Meridian Road is programmed into the District's current Capital Improvement Plan 2003: ID # 76. The project location is Meridian Road/Main Street to Fairview Avenue. The 1.6-mile segment is currently two to four-lanes and is proposed to be widened to three to four-lanes with a total of 70 to 84-feet of required right-of-way. Projected time frame of construction is 16 to 20-years. Even though the site is in the District's current Capital Improvement Plan 2003 no additional right-of-way is required from this site. B. Findings for Consideration Right-of-Way District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B}. This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes. Main Street is a minor arterial roadway with two-travel lanes including a center turn lane with curb, gutter and detached sidewalk within 80-feet of existing right-of-way. Main Street is not programmed into the Districts current Capita! Improvements Plan and/or Five Year Work Program for reconstruction or any roadway improvements. The Commission has directed staff to only purchase right-of--way on roadways that are in the Five Year Work Program or the Capital Improvements plan. Meridian Road The applicant should not be required to dedicate any additional right-of--way even though Meridian Road is programmed into the District's current Capital Improvement Plan 2003: ID # 76. The project location is Meridian Road/Main Street to Fairview Avenue. The 7.6-mile segment is cunrently two to four-lanes and is proposed to be widened to three to four-Janes with a total of 70 to 84-feet of required right-of-way. Projected time frame of construction is 16 to 20-years. Even though the site is in the District's current Capital Improvement Plan 2003 no additional right-of-way is required from this site. 3 2. Sidewalk District policy requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all collector roadways and arterial roadways (7204.7.2). The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road located 2-feet within the right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. Jf the sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-way, provide an easement for the sidewalk. The District will require a license agreement for the landscape strip with the detached sidewalk. An agreement must be approved prior to the issuance of a building permit (or any other required permits). Please contact the Right-of--Way Division at 387-3271 for guidelines. 3. Minor Improvements District policy 7203.6 requires the applicant of a proposed development to make improvements to existing damaged sidewalk; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devises; and other similar items in order to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. 4. Driveways District policy 72-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed limit of 35 to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. There are two driveways located on Main Street in close proximity to the site. - Driveway #1 is located on the same side of Main Street as the site and offsets approximately 70-feet north. (Measured near edge of driveway to near edge of driveway.) - Driveway # 2 is located on the east side of Main Street providing access to the US Postal Service and is in alignment with driveway # 1. District policy 72-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed limit of 25 to align or offset a minimum of 105-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. .There are several driveways located orrMeridian Road in close proximity to the site. - Driveway #1 is located on the west side of Meridian Road and aligns with the alley on the east side of Meridian Road. - W. Cherry Avenue intersects with Meridian Road on the west side approximately 132-feet north of the alley. (Measured near edge of Cherry Avenue to near edge of alley.) - Driveway #2 is located on the east side of Meridian Road in alignment with Cherry Avenue. The existing residential driveway located on Main Street approximately 5-feet north of the alley, should be closed, and the applicant should be required to fake access internally from the alley. The applicant should replace the unused curb cut on Main Street with standard curb, gutter and detached concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. The applicant should be required to take access internally from the alley with no additional access to Meridian Road. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. 4 District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles to a maximum width of 35-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways. 5. Alley District policy 7204.10.1 requires the dedication of additional right-of-way to obtain a minimum width from the centerline of the alley of 8-feet from residential uses and 10-feet for all other uses.' The District on a case-by-case basis will review dedication of additional right-of-way for the alley. The dedication of additional right-of--way will generally be required where it can be reasonably anticipated that other adjoining or nearby developments will also allow future dedications. The alleyway connects Main Street to Meridian Road. The applicant should be required to dedicate additional right-of--way to provide 10-feet from centerline. Alley Access Access is allowed to and from a fully improved designed so the minimum clear distance from the alley is 22-feet for perpendicular parking. alley (District policy 7204.10.2). Parking shall be back of the parking stall to the opposite side of the An access to an alley shall be located a minimum of 25-feet from the nearest public street. Parking in an alley is not allowed. Alleys are not considered part of the traffic circulation system (District policy 7202.6). Unless specifically approved by the District, an alley should not serve as primary access to a lot or building. Alleys shall connect to a public street at each end and shall not terminate in dead-ends. Alleys with curves are not allowed without specific District approval taken on good cause shown. Curves shall have a minimum inside radius of 26-feet. The existing residential driveway located on Main Street approximately 5-feet north of the alley, should be closed, and the applicant should be required to take access internally from the alley with no additional access to Meridian Road. The applicant should be required to replace the unused curb cut on Main Street with standard curb, gutter and detached concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Alley Intersection District Policy 7204.10.3 states a minimum of back-of-curb radius of 15-feet is required at all alley intersections. For the reconstruction of existing alleys, the back-of-curb radius may be less than 15- feet when it is impractical to remove existing obstructions. Alley Pavement District Policy 7204.10.1 states if the proposed development is not a single family detached residence and it takes access from an alley, the developer will be required to pave the entire width of the right- of-way from the nearest public street to and abutting the development. The applicant should be required to provide adddional pavement to the alley to from Main Street fo Meridian Road. Including the reconstruction of the intersections; where the alley intersects with Main 5 Street and Meridian Road if not previously completed. The applican; should be required to coordinate with District staff on the radii for the reconstruction of the alleyway intersections. C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval Construct a b-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road located 2-feet within the right- of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. If the sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-way, provide an easement for the sidewalk. The District will require a license agreement for the landscape strip with the detached sidewalk. An agreement must be approved prior to the issuance of a building permit (or any other required permits). Please contact the Right-of-Way Division at 387-3271 for guidelines. 2. Replace unused curb cut on Main Street with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. The applicant shall be required to provide access to the two lots internally from the improved alley. 4. Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide 10-feet from centerline of the alley. 5. Provide additional pavement to the alley with the dedication of right-of-way. 6. Other than the access point(s) specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Main Street and Meridian Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and alt applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6 7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #198, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACRD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. E. Conclusions of Law The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific, and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Appeal Guidelines Request for Appeal of Staff Decision Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thinly (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. Appeal Guidelines S ICKLAND SUBDIVISION THE SOUTH 83 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF BLOCK 2 F.A. NOURSE'S THIRD ADDITION LOCATED IN THE NIP 1/4 OF SECTION 7 T.3N., R.lE., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2003 VICINITY MAP " = 300' NIAYDI2 Rlnacar D. Coluile ~OUNI.IL b1RM BERS wILLL\~I L.;\l. NARY IEI fH I31RD tAMMV DF WEP.RD ' CHERI!' ~~C~ 1NDI ASS I2UI2 VL ' 112E CUM.'v11S90Nh125 IZICI IARD Gaeenr--. ~I~I-:R If Y LF:IGI I fC1N G II 1' (I P. i ( ~ f _.. ~~~~'~~ ~+_-~ Y L C ~'f I C/~CC ~E /~'I ffff i- II:. \I-1U 4.: CHIEF ICFN 14'. I30WE125 U rNU-rY CHIEI FIRE I'aEVeNTON Josl_NU Savn t)NI UTY CIII Il2Ai Vlfg_ RILI If )IIUSON I ~dyL .Il i'_Dllti vlu-iu I Il>9364:7 ~u:vl; I;u.lorr _ ., ~. - - FI;<r21vI qy~, ,i ~gn 1i:RiL-4_ti C._1" ~ 1-'.I~IjL i{I' C I ;t"PN_ ._ ,, ~~iJiJ~ V~~t'__!. December 22, 2003 DEC?;? : ; city of Nleridial City Clerk Ofhcc. TO: Mayor, City Council and the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission PROM: Joseph Silva. Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention SUB.iECT: Strickland Subdivision RZ 03-012, CUP 03-063, PFP 03-006 'fhe following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimwn levels of fire protection for the proposed project: 1. Provide a fu-e-flow per the International Fire Code Appendix D to service the project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 2. All internal roads shall have a fuming radius of 28' inside and 48' outside. 3. All access roads within the project shall have a clear driving surface with a minimum width of 20' available at all times. Provide a 20' driving surface in the alley for building access. MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird ~, ~~; j~..,,_ Le:p: it ; ~,Q ,/'' CITY OF j~g1#~x, Il IDAHO LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 • FAX 466-4405 PARKS& RECREATION (208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-500 • Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5531 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: Janu Transmittal Date: December 3, 2003 File No.: CUP 03-063 Request: Conditional Use zone for propose By: Roy Strickland Location of Property or Project: 1225 Main Street 2004 Hearing Date: to allow a medical office David Zaremba, P/Z (No vAR, vac, FP) Jerry Centers, P/Z (Na VAR, VAC, FP) Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith Bolup, P2 (No VAR, VAC, FP) Robert Corrie, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C!C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (NO VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department RECENED DEC 15 2003 City of Meridian City Clerk Office 2004 in a Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FPiPP Doty) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP Doty) U.S. West (FP/PP ~~ty) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP only) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (Annexaflon oMy) Ada County Land Records (FP/PP oNy) Meridian Development Corporation 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Oftice Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 8848723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 Historical Preservation Commission CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Return to: •• DISTRICT C HEALTH Environmental Health Division RECEIVED ^ Boise DEPARTMENT ^ Eagle DEC 16 213 Rezone # Conditional Use # 6 Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ~~/~Q '-2' / C. ^ Garden City ~deridian ^ Kuna ^ ACZ ^ Star ^ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ or bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. r/~]-S~After writte approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: al sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ~cetatral water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ~- The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of vironmental Qualify: I sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ~atral water ^ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ^ 14. Please see attached stormwater management recommendatations ^ 15. ^ child care center Date:~Z~/~ Reviewed By: ~ -~/ ~'~-~ Review Sheet CDHD 9NOIkc MAYOR Robert D. Carrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless .~ ~i Ii ~~ ~.~VCeYZG~1~12~ Il IDAHO LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 4GG-9272 • FAX 466-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-t297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Pax 887-1297 Keiih Bird ~H ~`TgEASUfiEV~' ,ligpj PLANNING&ZON(NG (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 8, 2004 Transmittal Date: December 3, 2003 Hearing Date: January 15, 2004 File No.: CUP 03-063 Request: Conditional Use Permit to allow a medical office building in a proposed O-T zone for proposed Strickland Subdivision ey: Roy Strickland Location of Property or Project: 1225 Main Street David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FPJ Leslie Mathes, P2 (No vAR, VAC, FP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No YAR, VAC, FP) Keith BOf71p, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Robert Come, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C ChepiE McCandless, C!C ._- ater Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FPJ Building Department Fire Department Police Department city Attorney Your Cor City Engineer City Planner ~~lv • J~ " 03 DEC ' S 20 Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PPonfy) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian brig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP only) U.S. West (FP/PP only) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP only) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP onry) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (AnnexaUOn only) Ada County Land Records (FP/PP only) Meridian Development_Corporation Remarks: RECEIVED CITY OF MERIDIAN 5;,~~TEyy~TI4;R DEPT. DEC - 8 2003 City of Meridian City Clerk Office • 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 J F11Y. 1J. C/JG4 11 • JGY'Il'I C~iPITAL DEVELCIPMENT, Ync. January 15, 2003 FAXED pIRECT (868-6854) Craig Hood, Associate CitrPlanner Meridian Planning and Zoning 660 E, Watertovver, Suite 202 Meridian, Id 83642 RE: SettlementBridge Subdivision. n~.ara r.ci5 R,~~~IV~ J ^.f ~` 1 '.i 2QO~s ~C~.y Gf'1Vl~ridian t'd ~~',: a~~,~ OfTice ~¢Z ~lfi~- DearCraig, ~'I-~ Vy15 ~ b ~ ~ ¢ f D I have reviewed the Anne>ation and Prefiminary.Pfat and Gonditional Use Permit staff report for Settlement Bridge Subdivision and over the following comments/clarifications. AnnexationlRezone Facts and Conditions: 1. We will complywith the condition as'stated. 2. We will'complywith the condition as stated. 3. We agree. 4. We will complywith tlis condition a5 stated and are can6nuing to negotiatewfth the Cityfn assisting them inthe~acquisiflori ofa well sifie within this subdiusion. Preliminary Plat Site Specific Conditions:, t. We wiH complywith the condition as stated: 2. We will complywith the.ooRditiori as stated. 3. We will complywith the condi#ion as stated. , 4. We request additional fang'uage.to this Condition referelteing the staffs comments regarding the Locust Grove frgntage as itpertains to the Idaho Power properly (see page 1 p in staff report). 5. As Settlemen# Bridge is a Planned i)evelopment, we request utilizing common lots, and notflag lots; forthe access fo.r#hese lots (as the platwas originallysubmitted). These reasons are: 1) itis~easierto reference a common lotwithin CC&Rs and/or use individual deed restrictions forthe access and maintenance of a common driveway, and 2) the Cityhas approved similar designs with common driveways located on common lots in other Plannrsd Developments within the City of Meridian. Page 1 of 4 6200 North Meeker Place Boise, Idaho 83713 Office: (208) 377-3939 Fax; (208) 3753271 - n ^?d0!'JC7^lnn nnrr n^~ ~~ inn. L.J. c.ve'-, a+•..JLnI~ ~YV. vro r.J/J Capita/ DBVB/OpfNBpf. /pC. 82DD N. Meeker PI. -Boise. Idaho 83713 - (2081377-3939 6. We will complywith the condition as stated. 7. We will complywith the condition as stated. 8. We will complywith the condition as stated. 9. We will complywith the condition as stated, 10. We will complywith the condition as stated. 11. We will complywith the condition as stated. We request that ifa well site is acquired by Meridian Ci~rwithin this area, that the Ciiywork with us in protecting these trees. 12. We agree with the condition as stated withthe following change; The second bullet should add the following language at the end of the paragraph: "liar agreement cannot be reachedwith SID, then an alternative method of compliance can be approved at staffleve! wilU~ Meridian City P&Zstaf$" {The purpose for the change to the condition is that in the eventan agreement cannot be reached with Settlers Irrigation District (SID), an al~rnative is approved without having to go backthrough the P&Z approval/hearing process), 13. We will complywith the condition as stated. 14. Justlike a recentlyapproved subdivision ofours, Baldwin ParkPddition, we ask that this condition be slightlymodifled. l~gain,the purpose forthechange is thatwe believe an encroachment agreement may not be necessaryonce the ditch is realigned and a new easement is given to the Irrigation District. We request this condition be replaced with the following language: "Ifany builabble lots are located within tl>'e Settlers Irrigation District Easement the applicant shall be required to submit a copy of an encroachment agreement priorto the schedulinga preconstnrction meeting for the applicable phase." Page 2 of 4 JRN 15 '04 19 33 17V1RR75R?71 PC1GF_A-i JI'111. 1J. LCJCJY 1J.• iru.yro r. vim 15. Though we agree with this condition in concept, we have concerns with the portion of the condition referendng "tfasingle-pointconnecfion is utilized, thedeveloper shall be responsibleforthe payment of assessments forthe common areas prior to signature on thefinal platbytheCityEngineer." The reason forourconcem is that, as we are negotiating with the Cityforawell site within this subdivision,we feel this condition mayrequire the dtyto purchase the land for the well site. In other words, having us both donate the land forthe well site and then paythe Cityforthese common area assessments seems inappropriate. We request thatthe condition be modified to a!!ow stall the ability to eiU~er charge a reduced assessment, or eloninate fhe assessmer~ dependaing on the value of the land neededfor the well site. 16. We request this condition be modified. We should not be required to give easements to the Cltyforsewerwiihoutpaymentiftheeasementsare outside our phasing. This was recenfiyagreed bythe City Council forthe Paramount subdivision, UI~ will committo work with the Cityifeasements are desired. 17. Same as Condition #18. We request this condition be modified. We should not be required togive easements to the City forwater without payment tithe easements are outside ourphasing. This was recently agreed bythe City Council foriheParamountsubdivision. We commit to work with the City ifeasemen~are desired. 18. We will complywith the condition as stated. 19. We will complywith the wndition as stated. 2l). INe will complywith the condition as stated. 21. We request this condition be clarified that fire easements will be given, in favor ofthe City, prior to the CitYEngineersigning thefinal plat foreach phase where the pathwaywill be within the phase. One wayto clarifythis condifion would be to delefis the parenthesis atthe end of the condition. 22. We will complywith the condition as stated. 23. We will complywith the condition as stated, however, we would prefer to s ubmit a revised preliminaryplatoncethe preliminaryplatis approved and the conditions of approval are finalised byCiiyCouncil. Page 3 of 4 JRN 15 '04 10 34 12063753271 PRGE.04 JIlI1. 1J. CUOIY 11•JJrll'I IYV.4f C} r.'/' Capital Deve-onment. Inc. 6200 N esker PI - Boisa Idaho 63713 - (209! 377-3939 Condl'b'onal Use Permit Site Specific Conditions: We will complywith the condition as stated, 2. We will complywith the condition as stated, with the exception that the last sentence of the second bullet be deleted and replaced with the same language as Preliminaryplatcondition #5 referencing this is a Planned Developmentandwill utilize common lot for com mon drivewayaccess to these lots. 3. We ask thatthecondition bemodified with iwo changes. Ifa well site is acquired, appro>amately 15,000 square feet ofopen space maybe reduced from the plat We ask that the condition be modified to recognize that, "If the City acquires a wellsite in the area where commonarea is proposed, additional open space wi!! not 6e requiredby the development." "Also, we requestthat the "Meridian Looppathway can be located on either side of the North Slough Canal." 4. We will complywith the condition as stated. 5. We requesttheconditionto be mod~ed to add a secondsentencethatstates, "the Meridian Looppathway is allowed in lieu of a 5-foot sidewalk where the pathway location coincides with the sidewalk. General Requirements: The applicant has reviewed all the General Requirements and agrees to complywith ALL of them in the City Staff report. to general the applicantconcurs with the Staff reportwith the clarifications mentioned above. If there is additional information oritems thatneed clarification, I will be available for public testirnony,withourplannerand ourengineer,when this item is heard at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. S' erely Q.J`~4-- e.~..._ DaveYorgaso Cc: Mike Warclle (va a-mall) Gene Smith (fx 378-5558} JoAnn Butler (fx 388-t 001) City Clerk (fx 868-421 B) Page 4 of 4 JRN 15 ' 04 1034 12093753271 PGlr;F. 0S 11 V. Y 1 V I• 1~ J ~EC~IV~; JAr; ; 5 2004 C~IPITAL t,~~~ o~ z~ersa~a~~ DEVELOPMENT, Inc. city Clerk °~°e 6200 N. Meeker Place, Boise, Idaho 83713 Phone: 208-377-3939 January 15, 2004 10:16 AM Fax:208-375-3271 Email: capdev@caUleone.net Fax Cover Sheet Send to: Tara Green From: Dave Yor ason Office: City of Meridian- Clerk Fax number: 888-4218 Office: Ca ital Development Re: Settlement Brid e cc: ^ Urgent ^ Reply ASAP ®For Your Review ^ As Requested ^ FYI Total Pages (including cover): 5 Comments• If yore do not receive aid pages, please call as soon as possible. Thank you! SRN 15 '84 1033 taaazvs~~v~ Por,F Gl1