Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSt. Alphonsus Ambulatory Care Center RZ 00-010MAYOR Robert D. Cowie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless '~' HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~' A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 10, 2001 Transmittal Date: December 14, 2000 Hearing Date: January 18, 2001 File No.: RZ 00-010 Request: Rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center Bye BRS Architects Location of Property or Project: southeast corner Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z __ Meridian School District Jerry Centers, P/Z __ Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Richard Hatcher P/Z __Ada County Highway District , Keith Borup, P/Z Community Planning Assoc. Robert Corrie, Mayor Central District Health Ron Anderson, C/C __ Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Tammy deWeerd C/C Settlers Irrigation District , Keith Bird, C/C Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) __Cherie McCandless C/C U.S. West (FP/PP) , Water Department Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Sewer Department Ada County (Annexation) Sanitary Service Idaho Transportation Department Building Department Fire Department _~ Police Department __ City Attorney City Engineer City Planner ___ Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 ~~~ DEC 2 1 X000 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ~;ity of ,(VXeridia~t ~'ity a^i~r~1~ ~9ffa~.~, Your Concise Remarkc• .,v ...ir/VQ -~ MAYOR Robert D. Cowie bbL0b8889Z CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWecrd Cherie McCandless NUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CIT~i~' OF 1V.[E1~I~IAN 33 EAST YDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 8364 (203} 888.4433 • Fax (208) 8S7-x813 City Clcrk Office Fax (208) 888-a2 ( 8 TS:80 00, ZZ C3Q LEGAL DEPARTMENT (ZUS) ?SS•2ay9 • Fax 238.2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)SS7-1211 • Fax 357-129? PLANNING qND ZONING DEPAR7M$NT (20S) 38x.5533 • Fax 588-635a TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hail Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by; January 10, 2001 Transmittal Date: December 14, 2000 Hearing Date: January 1$, 2001 File No.: RZ 00-010 Request: Rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center R~.~ ooe~ . __ ._ •. -•- ••••••.-.~a.~n~ecGS t.ocation of Property or Project: southeast corner Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, p/Z Robert Come, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department 'r Sewer Department Sanitary Service __ Building Department Fire Department .. Police Department City Attorney ~_City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Reside. Gen • Z6 PP/FP/PfP -~0 AZ-71 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District __~ Community Planning Assoc, __ Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Your Concise Remarks: R,~CE~D DEC 2 2 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN L0/SAd b'bL0b888AZ=QI N'7 r H iu ^r ~ .~ .~ MAYOR .-.. NUB OE TREASURE VALLEY '~ Robert D. Come A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY COU CITY OF MERIDIAN `'08''x8-2499 • Fax 288.2501 NCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird IVIERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 10, 2001 Transmittal Date: December 14, 2000 Hearing Date: January 18, 2001 File No.: RZ 00-010 Request: Rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center By: BRS Architects Location of Property or Project: Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department c~-o~-o~ Building Department Your Concise Remarks: _~ Fire Department - Police Department (,J'~ ~, City Attorney City Engineer (oC.~ ~ City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 ~,~G~~~ JAN ` 4 2001 City of 111eriidn °r City Cierls ~3ffr;:= southeast corner Cherry Lane and Ten Mile ulino~'Lbb1 07;18 2088885052 SANITARY SERVICE PAGE 06 ,41.~1'OR HU8 OF TRE,aSURE VaGGEY Ruben D Currie ~ Good Placa to Live CI LEGAL DEPgR'MENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TY O~ 1 MERIDIA ('~s? -'38.2649 • Fax 2ss-250t Ron Anderson N 33 EAST IDAHO PUBLIC woR~ Ke~ch gird Tammy dcWmcrd ~tiIERIDIAIV, IDAHO $3642 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-t297 Chene ;~~Gandless (?OS) 388-~33 • Fax (208) 881.4&I3 City Clerk OffiCn Fax (208) 858-4?l8 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT i20E) ssa-5533 • Fax 888-SSSa TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PRO WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN JECTS To insure that your comments antl recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Plannin and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendationg to Meridian Ci all Attn: WiH Berg, City Clerk, b : ~ y January 10, 2001 Transmittal Date: December 14 2000 Hearing Date: January 1$, 2001 File No.: RZ 00-010 Request: Rezone of 8.88 acres from R-d to L-O for proposed St. Al honsus Re Iona Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center 9 ~ ey' BRS Architects Location of Property or Project: southeast corner Cher Lane and Ten Mile ~_ Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z _,~_ Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z ,.~_ Keith Borup, P/Z ~,,. Robert Currie, Mayor _,,..~_ Ron Anderson, C/G __ Tammy deWeerd, C/C ~_ Keith Bird, C/C _~_ Cherie McCandless, C/C _, Water Department ._._~ Sewer Department _,._,~tiC Sanitary Service ~w Building Department _i, Fire Department ~_ Pofice Department Meridian School District ____ Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning ,qs_~. Central District Health ~_ Nampa Meridian brig. District Settlers Irrigation District ______ Idaho Power Co. (f=p/pp) „_,___ U. S. West (FP/PP) ,.,__ intermountain Gas (FP/Pp) ._.__' Ada County (,4nnexation) ~_ Idaho Transportation DenartmF Your Concise Remarks: ' L~ a ~~ City Attorney _` City Engineer -~_ City Planner __~_ Parks Department (Residential Aa~tcations ontyl Grn • 26 PPlFP/PFD . JO ~Z . 27 ~~~'~~ IAN ° 5 2001 t~at~ of tl'leridisto. ~''itv Cl!Frk C)ffic~~: JAN 05 '01 07 36 2088885052 por_~ ~~ CENTRAL •• DISTRICT ~11"HEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone CENTRH~ DISTRICT HEALTH DEP~r~TMENT Environmental Health Division Return to: ^ Boise ^ Eagle Conditional Use # _ Preliminary /Final / Sh for P atl ,old ^ Garden City ~[Vleridian ^ Kuna ^ ACZ ^ Star ~. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ~~~ ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ~_ ~i._ ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we canM~~~ ~o~h s 9' ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can com ~~e~" F'~ ~te~ ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data conceming the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ or bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources conceming well construction and water availability. ^ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ^ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ^ central water ^ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ^ 14. ^ child care center Date: ~1 ,/~~-~'-/d l Reviewed By: ~~'°`-- ~~ ~~o~~ Review Sheet j^'~, :- CHD ,ice Ada County Highway District Judy Peavey-Derr, President Dave Bivens, 1st Vice President Sherry R. Huber, 2nd Vice President Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner flaviri F 1Nvnknnn [:nmmissinner J I ZS CdSI J / LI I Jll CCl Garden City ID 83714-6499 Phone (208) 387-6100 FAX (208) 387-6391 E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us RECEIVED JAN 2 2 2001 January 18, 2001 TO: Mike Ondracek St Alphonsus Regional Medical Center 1055 N Curtis Rd Boise, ID 83706 FROM: Christy Richardson, Principal Development Analyst Planning & Development ~,,~j~~px~ SUBJECT: MCUP00-056/MRZ00-010 Medical facility/bank s/e/c Ten Mile Road/Cherry Lane CITY OF MERIDIAN The Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District on January 17, 2001 acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached staff report lists conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have and questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6170. Cc: Planning & Development/chron/project file City of Meridian Construction Services -John Edney Drainage -Chuck Rinaldi Doug Racine BRS Architects 1010 S Allante Place Suite 100 Boise, ID 83709 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planlzing and Development Division Develop~l~ent Application Report MCUP00-056/MRZ-00-010 s/e/c Ten Mile Road/Chei~y Lane Medical facility/bank This application has been refen-ed to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. The applicant is requesting conditional use approval to build an ambulatory care center and bank. The 8.8- acre site is located at the southeast coi7ler of Chen-y Lane and Ten Mile Road. This development is estimated to generate 1,520 additional vehicle trips per day (0 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Roads impacted by this development: Cherry Lane Ten Mile Road ACHD Commission Date -January 17, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. ~9CUP0O-o~6.cmi~, P~i~~e 1 Facts and Findings: A. Generallnfonnation Owner - St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Applicant - BRS Architects R-4 -Existing zoning L-O -Requested zoning 8.8 -Acres 188,000- Square feet of proposed building 272 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada -Impact Fee Service Area Meridian -Impact Fee Assessment District r Chen~y Lane Principal arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count on 10/4/00 is 10,725 (e/o Ten Mile Road) Better than "C" -Existing Level of Service Better than "C" -Existing phis project build-out Level of Service 1,261 feet of frontage on Cherry Lane 105-feet existing right-of--way (60-feet south from centerline) No additional right-of--way required Chevy Lane is improved with a 5-lane street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the site. The Ten Mile RoadlCherry Lane intersection is signalized. Ten Mile Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 9,224 on 10/4/00 (s/o Chei1-y Lane) Better than "C" -Existing Level of Service Better than "C" -Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 220-feet of frontage on Ten Mile Road 90-feet existing right-of--way (45-feet from centerline) No additional right-of--way required Ten Mile Road is improved with a 5-lane street section with curb, goiter and sidewalk abutting the site. The Ten Mile Road/Cherry Lane intersection is signalized. B. On .lanua~y 2, 2001, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation svstem in the vicinity. On ,lanuarv 5, 2001, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and revie~~-ed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation svstem. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. ~9CUPG0-0~6.cmi~~ ~,.11e - ~ ~ C. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in w~7ting by the District Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file nwnbers) for details. D. 7-he applicant is proposing to construct a driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 205- feet south of the sig~lalized intersection at Cheny Lane. Dist-ict policy requires driveways on 'Ten Mile Road to be located a minimum of 440-feet from a signalized intersection for fill] access, 220-feet for restricted right-in/right-out access.. and 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. There is an existing driveway on Ten Mile Road located 40-feet south of the site that serves a church. An Albertson's store uses an existing driveway on Ten Mile Road located 40-feet south of the site on the opposite side of the street. The site has insufficient frontage for a full access driveway and does not meet the offset requirements from other existing driveways. The applicant is proposing to constrict this entrance as a right-iii/right-out driveway. Staff recommends a modification of policy of the required l 50-foot offset requirement from the existing driveways to the south for the site's proposed driveway because the site has insufficient frontage to offset a driveway from both the intersection a~1d the existing driveway to the south. The applicant should be required to construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40- feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median should be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. E. Western Driveway: The applicant is proposing to conshuct a right-in/right-out driveway on Chei~y Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road. District policy requires driveways on Cherry Lane to be located a minimum of 440-feet from a signalized intersection for full access, 220-feet for restricted right-iii/right-out access, and 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. There is an existing driveway on Cherry Lane located 170-feet east of Cherry Lane that serves a church. Staff recommends that the applicant construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right- i»/right-out operations so as not to restrict the existing drivewav on the north side of Cherry Lane. The on-site median design should be reviewed and approved by ACRD Traffic Services staff, and should be signed for right-turn movements. The driveway may be constructed 40-feet wide to accommodate the additional width of the median. ~1CUP00-0`b.cmm f'.~~~c _ n F. 1\9iddle Drive~~av: The applicant is proposing to construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cheny Lane located 295-feet east of the proposed western driveway. District policy requires driveways on Cheny Lane to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways (measured near edge to near edge). The. applicant has sufficient frontage to locate a driveway in conformance with District policy. The applicant should supply a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cheny Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The applicant is proposing to construct this driveway 46-feet wide. ACRD allows that width for driveways with an island constructed within the driveway separating the inbound and outbound traffic and offering a pedestrian refuge. The island should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. G. Eastern Driveway: The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway on Cherry Lane located 295-feet east of the proposed middle driveway. District policy requires driveways on Cheny Lane to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways (measured near edge to near edge). The applicant has sufficient frontage to locate a driveway in conformance with District policy. The applicant should supply a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cheny Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The applicant has indicated that they may move the eastern driveway towards the east property line. ACRD does not have any restrictions on the placement of the driveway .other than the offset requirements. H. Unless specifically approved, the driveways on Cheny Lane and Ten Mile Road should be constructed 30 to 35-feet wide. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gavel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action. by the District the applicant should be required to pave the driveways their fill] width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. The applicant should be required to replace any unused club cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cher-v Lane with sta~,~dard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. ]n order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide au Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program ~~ ith the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at ;57-6] 60. ~~~9CUPOO-O;b.cmm P ~~~r -J K. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any 'Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TlVIO) that is foi7»ed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An amnia] survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. L. Based on development patterns in tlvs area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this report. Special Recommendation to the City of Meridian: In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Comnnrteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a botiuldary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: Construct a 30 to ~5-foot wide right-in/ri~ht-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 205-feet south of the signalized intersection at Chei7y Lane as proposed. Construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point ] 0-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of drive~a,av. 7-he median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supcr~ isor for revie~~~ and a letter of approval. Construct a ,0 to ~5-foot wide ri~~ht-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 2,0-feet east of the siunalized intersection at Ten 1~9i1e Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the drive~a av to ri~~ht-in~'ri~~ht-out operations. Submit a ~7CUPOQ-0~6.cmm P ie~ design o~~f the median to the District's Traffic Se~~~ice's Supervisor for review- and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to accommodate the on-site median. 3. Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of ] 50-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cher7-y La~~e to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. 4. Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. Pave all of the driveways their frill width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. 6. Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 7. Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be detenllined by ACRD Construction Services staff. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Constriction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. 9. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane is prohibited. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of an_v requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in ~yriting to the ACND Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of ~yhv such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The ~~-ritten request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion ~yith the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remo~~e the item from the consent agenda and MCUP00-r)~(,.cn,n, ~ r.. report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. After ACRD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning aid Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Constriction Services procedures and all applicable ACRD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of constlletion. 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway Dist-iet. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written conf nmation of anv change from the Ada County 14i~hwav District. 9. Anv change by the applicant in the planned use of the property ~~hich is the subject of this application, shall require the apphcant to comply with all rules. regulations, ordinances, plans. or other regulatory and legal rest-ictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a ~~ aiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. N1CUP00-0~6.cmm I'a<,~ - Conclusion of La~~~: ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff January 17, 2001 ~1ClJP0~~-0~6.ci~u» i~ ~~~ BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION In The Matter of The ) Case No. RZ-00-010 Request FOR REZONE of ) APPROXIMATELY 8.88 ) RECOMMENDATION TO ACRES FOR PROPOSED ) CITY COUNCIL AMBULATORY CARE ) CENTER ) tea, Y_ i~~~~~ ST. ALPHONSUS ) ~ - - ~-+ REGIONAL MEDICAL ) ~~~ ~ 6 200' CENTER, ) L:ITY OF MERIDIAN Applicant CITY CLERK OFFICE 1. The property is approximately 8.88 acres in size. The property is generally located at the southeast corner of Ten Mile Road and Cherry Lane, in Meridian. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is St Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, of Boise, Idaho. 3. The Applicant is owner of record. 4. The property is presently zoned as R-4, and is fallow agricultural. 5. The Applicant requests the property be rezoned to L-O. 6. The proposed site is surrounded by a church and residential subdivision to the north, a church and residential subdivision to the south, a residential subdivision to the east and retail uses to the west. 7. The subject property is within the city limits of the City of Meridian. 8. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 1 REQUEST FOR REZONE -AMBULATORY CARE CENTER - ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 9. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: construction of ambulatory care center. 10. The Applicant's requested rezoning of the subject real property as L-O is consistent with the commercial designation on the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Existing Urban. 11. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. RECOMMENDATION 1. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the rezoning as requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application. Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staffas follows: 1.1 The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 1.2 The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: a. Any significant modifications to the subject site plan as approved by the City will require submittal of a new CUP application, whether or not the future use is permitted in the L-O zone. Significant modifications will include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. A pedestrian crossing through the landscape planter must be RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 REQUEST FOR REZONE -AMBULATORY CARE CENTER - ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER constructed to connect this row of parking with the bank if these stalls are required as part of the future bank site. 1.3 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 1.4 Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance 11-13 for use of undeveloped lots. 1.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 1.6 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on- site. 1.7 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 1.8 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 1.9 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 1.10 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District s Traffic Service s Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 1.11 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right-in/right- out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District s Traffic Service s RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3 REQUEST FOR REZONE -AMBULATORY CARE CENTER - ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER r-~ n Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40- feet to accommodate the on-site median. 1.12 Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. 1.13 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. 1.14 Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. 1.15 Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 1.16 Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACRD Construction Services staff. 1.17 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 1.18 Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane is prohibited. Z:\Work\ib1\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Recommendations\RZOlOStAls.wpd RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 4 REQUEST FOR REZONE -AMBULATORY CARE CENTER - ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ._. .-. Saint Alphonsus February 12, 2001 City Council of Meridian RE: Medical Office Buildings Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ten Mile Road and West Cherry Lane Meridian, ID Dear City Council Members; RECEIVED FEB 16 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center (SARMC) is very committed to the growing population in the Meridian Community, and we are poised to support the medical needs by developing medical offices and outpatient surgery services. SARMC purchased 8.9 acres of land at Ten Mile Road and West Cherry Lane in November 2000. With the historical growth and projected new growth in and around this location, our development will be well positioned to meet the consumer's demands in the future. SARMC recognized the need to build auser-friendly outpatient medical facility adjacent to neighborhoods based upon a focus group we conducted through an outside firm. The neighbors in and around the Meridian Community indicated they did not want a hospital adjacent to their neighborhood. Rather, they indicated they wanted convenient same day medical care that did not compromise the integrity of their neighborhood. We believe our proposed medical office building and same day surgery center adjacent to established subdivisions and located along a well traveled intersection addresses their expectations. The services we plan on providing at our new facility will include outpatient surgery, rehabilitation services (i.e. physical and occupational therapy), lab and x-ray services, and pharmaceutical services. In addition to medical services, we plan on supporting a variety of community wellness programs within the facility. Citizens throughout the community will be able to attend programs, such as; childbirth classes, nutrition seminars, and geriatric focused programs. This facility will also have the capability to have medical information shared with Saint Alphonsus' Hospital, so patients and medical providers will have immediate access to best serve our patients' needs. Office hours will be from Gam to lOpm, Monday through Friday, and on Saturday when appropriate. It is our desire to exceed the expectation of our patients, so we will be flexible with our hour and days of operation to accommodate the patients we serve. On January 18`h, we received approval from the Planning and Zoning Committee. During the meeting, we did encounter some questions from the surrounding neighbors, so we attempted to call each of them to provide additional information and/or clarification. In addition, we contacted the adjacent LDS Church and the 7`h-Day Adventist Church. Both churches indicated they had no opposition to our proposed facilities. I have also attached a letter from the President of Norco, which indicates strong support for our medical facility. It is SARMC's assessment that we have appropriately taken into account the 2000 draft Meridian Comprehensive Plan as it relates to new medical services in the community. We welcome the encouragement by the proposed comprehensive plan to identify medical services to locate or expand in the city of Meridian. SARMC's main objective is to ensure the provision of high-quality primary and specialty outpatient care to the citizens of Meridian. It is our goal to continue to grow with the Meridian Community. Please feel free to contact my office at 367-2394 if I can provide additional information prior to the City Council Meeting on February 20`x. Sincerely , ~~ ~ ~ ~~l ~l,..~'~~ ~~ '' -------z ___ Michael Ondracek Director, Business Development BLUF. CHIP ENTERPRISE orco° ;LD~NG • SAFETY • MEDICAL Supplies and Gases ll2~ ` -V. rLM111T5 ~'> - BOISE, ID 83705 February 2, 2001 Meridian City Council City of Meridian Dear Council Members: ISO9002 - TUN' CERT Qrv.ln $ISn n REGISn RED JOINT COhIh11S510N accBEOlunon ov eeurecule oBSY~'IZYnovs TBE BEST LN THE NORTHR'EST EY.NILY' BCSIA'ESS AR',1RDS (208) 336-1643 . TEL (208) 331-9538 • F.~~ Norco is in favor of allowing St. Alphonsus to construct a medical office facility at the corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road. We have retail welding, safety and medical supply stores in Meridian on Fairview Avenue and in Nampa on the Boulevard. The need for ambulatory care facilities and medical offices will increase as your area of the Treasure Valley continues to grow. Norco employees who reside in Meridian need these services. Having this St. Alphonsus facility will also increase retail business in our medical supply stores. Please allow this project to move forward. Sincerely, Jim Kissler Chief Executive Officer ID.AlIO • M01\T,~'YA • OREGON • 1\"El'.~.a • ~1:4SHINGTON !~ ARCHITECTS 1010 S. ALLANTE PLACE, SU1TE 100 BOISE, IDAHO 83709 TELEPHONE 208 336 8370 FAX 208 336 8380 Memo Date: 02/12/01 to: City of Meridian, Planning and Zoning Department Ams Brad Hawkins-Clark From: Doug Racine Re: Ambulatory Care Center /Medical Office Building Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Meridian, ID BRS No. 2K139 Per our telephone conversations, I am writing to clarify specific items noted in your January 16, 2001 Memorandum to the Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission regarding our Rezone and Conditional Use/PUD applications. I would also like to address some issues raised during testimony at our January 18, 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission Hearing. Memo Clarifications: 1) Rezone Site Specific Requirement No. 2 and Conditional Use/PUD Site Specific Requirement No. 12 regarding the Proposed Bank Site. Both requirements reference to conditions that are to be included in a Development Agreement. For this reason, we need to clarify that the bank parcel, as configured, has been shown for conce tual approval within the context of the proposed Rezone and CUP/PUD. We understand that should there be significant modifications (as defined in requirements 2.a and 12.d, and as determined by staff) at the time a specific bank and site configuration are determined, such modifications would require application for a modification of our current CUP/PUD application. As a modification, the bank parcel • Page 1 would be reviewed on its own merit and either approved or denied without jeopardizing or compromising the approval of our current CUP/PUD application for Saint Alphonsus' Medical Office Building. Additionally, in the event a bank deal does not materialize, we ask that these conditions state that we are allowed to develop any other principally allowed L-O use on that parcel, subject to staff's review and approval. If the nature of such a development were determined by staff to exceed the conceptual intent of the current CUP/PUD, then that change would also be require a modification as noted above. Again, any such modification would be reviewed on its own merit. At the risk of being repetitive, I want to reemphasize that the bank parcel is conceptual only at this point. Any future development or action on this parcel is intended to be independent of our current applications and approvals, specifically the ambulatory care/medical office building portion. In no way do we want the final disposition of the bank parcel to jeopardize our ability to proceed with the balance of the development. 2) Per our conversations, staff realizes that the material color palette we have presented is also conceptual at this time. Based on this, it is our understanding we will have the latitude to modify colors in the future, subject to staff s review. Hearing Issues Clarifications: 1) Several Site Plan issues were raised during the Planning and Zoning Hearing and in your Memorandum to which we agreed. The attached, revised Master Site Development Plan has been updated accordingly. These items are: a) Per CUP/PUD Specific Requirement 11., adding a 6-foot high, vertical wood slat fence along the southerly property line abutting the residential properties. b) Per Rezone Specific Requirement 2.c and CUP/PUD Specific Requirement 12.f, providing an access point through the landscape berm along the east property line of the bank parcel to allow more direct access from these (9) parking stalls to the bank. c) Per CUP/PUD Specific Requirement 7., reducing the number of parking stalls along the south property line adjacent to the Ten Mile Road access to eliminate conflict between cars entering the site and cars backing out of these spaces. We have eliminated (3) spaces to allow fora 100-foot long internal stack space per the recommendations of our traffic engineer, Dan Thompson of Earth Tech, Inc. d) Per CUP/PUD Specific Requirement 8., shifting the trash enclosure near the bank parcel to the east to allow for waste truck access. e) Per CUP/PUD Specific Requirement 10., revising the evergreen trees located within the street buffers along Ten Mile and Cherry Lane to deciduous trees. • Page 2 f) Per CUP/PUD Specific Requirement 6., we clarified that our intent is to maintain the property configuration in two parcels. We intend to create the bank parcel by reconfiguring the lot lines via a lot line adjustment application and record of survey. 2) Ada County Highway District asked in their Development Application Report that we indicate the locations of existing driveways on the north side of Cherry Lane. Further, we were to show that our driveways meet the District's policy of either aligning with or offsetting 150 feet from those existing driveways. At the P & Z Hearing we acknowledged that our eastern most driveway on Cherry Lane would need to shift approximately 60 feet to the east to accommodate this policy. Please note that the attached, revised Master Site Development Plan reflects this change. 3) During public testimony, some neighbors had questions regarding the nature of the site lighting. We emphasized that we would comply with the ordinance requirements. Specifically, that site lighting would be designed so that light does not directly reflect or spill over into adjacent residential districts, that the site lighting arrangement would be approved by the City Engineer and that we would comply with the listed site lighting standards. However, in an effort to provide additional information and possibly alleviate any concerns, we have provided the attached Conceptual Site Lighting Plans to show our proposed site lighting an angement, light levels and fixture types. 4) During the hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission imposed an "hours of operation" restriction from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Since this restriction will be included in the Development Agreement, we seek clarification of the definition of these "hours". We propose that "Hours of Business Operation" be specifically defined as "Hours during which the facility is actually open for business and patients are on the premises being seen or treated." Additionally, we would like it clarified that facility maintenance, before or after hours staff preparation or other similar activities occurring when the facility is not open for business are not subject to Hours of Business Operation restrictions. Please review this memorandum and the attached information as soon as possible and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. In sending it to you, it is my understanding that the City Clerk will provide a copy of the same to the members of the City Council prior to our February 20, 2001 Council Hearing. cc: Mike Ondracek - SARMC • Page 3 ..~, ,~-. r:p0 N. Orrbtrtl Sire~r, Suite 901, Rni<e, id:~hu Ri7n(,: February 9, 2001 Doug Racine BRS Architects 1010 S Allante, Suite 100 Boise, ID 83709 RE: SAMRC Dear Doug: As requested, we have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. In particular, we have; been asked to comment on access on to Ten Mile Road, Good site design should include a throat at accesses to store traffic attempting to enter and exit the site. The throat should be free from side traffic and be long enough to store exiting traffic so consestion is removed from the intersection with the main street. The access on to Ten Mile Road would appear to comply with good design practices. Telephone : =uR.~75.h jaq Facsimile : Section 7207.9.2 of the ACRD Development Policy Manual, 1999, recommends that . ;, s . ~ 7 s • s ~ s 3 driveways for this type of development have a throat length of 100 feet for outbound travel and 50 feet for inbound traffic. The site plan, as proposed, appears to conform with this recommendation. Should you have any questions, plesse feel free to contact me at 375-8324. Sincerely, Earth Tcch C~ Daniel A. Thompson, P.E. Idaho RCE 7310 Project Manaser E A R T H `~ T E C H L:1 wORlClo0290 BRS Sr AfslDoulnccur.doc a u/ee w.*EArrnnoNU ~*o. coMVaHr ozrovot WHEN IT COMES TO REDUCING LIGHT TRESPASS, NO OPTICAL SYSTEM BEATS R4SC he most effective way to minimi.e spill light from a parking lot is to locate forward thnxw (IES t}~pe 4), optics around the perimeter. Lithonia Lightinb's R4SC is designed specifically for this application. Nothing minimi_es spill light as well. The R4SC distribution was designed w pruteu the surrounding environment from unwanted light trespass. As shown in the illustrations below, other forward throw distributions spill anywhere from 10°0-20% of the luminaire's light behind the pole unto surroundinb property. The R4SC allows less than 3~o behind the pole. Another benefit of the R4SC design, as a result of virtually eliminating light behind the pole, is werw lon° brightness or glare when wiewin~~ the luminaire from behind. The additional cost and unappealing look of external baffles or optical shields is eliminated ~~'hen using the R4SC. Sharp houseside cutoff and etficient fonward throw is the essence ~~f rf:c~ R-l~C. TRADITIONAL FORWARD THROW LIGHT REFLECTOR. R4SC LITHONIA FORWARD THROW. Why Specify R4SC? When to Specify R4SC? • Unsurpassed houseside cutoff. • Parking lots near residential areas, or adjacent • Forward-throw performance. "other owned" propertw. • Meets IES full cutoff criteria. • Applications where light trespass ordinances • Very low glare behind the fixture. must be met. • Near roadways where fixture blare could be ha_ardous. • Tu provide the best houseside cututf solution available. • For use with Lithonia's KSE, KSF B~; KVE. KVR. ~ ,~-~ LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY AT ITS FINEST. Increased emphasis on controlling stray light in outdoor applications is sending designers in search of new lighting tools. Lithonia Lighting now addresses these needs with full cutoff luminaires equipped with application specific distribution patterns. • THE NEED: To provide parking lot lighting that offers safety and security in an energy efficient and cost effective manner. • THE CHALLENGE: To protect adjacent property from objectionable glare and spill light; to put the right amount of light in the right place in the most cost effective manner. • THE SOLUTION: Lithonia Lighting Luminaires equipped with R4SC and R4W distributions. "To preserve the restful quality of nighttime, by eliminating intrusive artificial light and lighting that unnecessarily contributes to `sky gloav."' Typical city ordinance R4SC REFLECTOR • R4W REFLECTOR • WHITE PETERSON WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIGRAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. KEVIN E. DINIUS CI3RI$TOPTIER S. NYE JULIE Ki,IIN FYscl~t PfIII.IP A. PEI'F12SON WM. F. GIGRAY, III ERIC S. RossMAx BRING J. JoI-u~sox TODD A. RossMnN D. SAMUFd. Jolnvsox DAV>D M. SwnxTLEY LARRY D. MOORS TERRENCER WHITE** WILLIAM A. MORROW MCHOLAS L. WOLLIN WILLIAM F. NICHOLS* *Also admitted in OR ** Also admitted in WA To: Staff Applicant Affected Property Owner(s) Re: Application Case No. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 EAST CARLTON AvE., STJI'tE 31 PosT OFFICE Box1150 MmIDrAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TII. (208) 288-2499 FAx (208) 288*250] E-MAU.: @wePMC.coM January 29, 2001 RZ-00-010 Gv-~ NANIPA OFFICE 5700 E. FRANKLIN RD., STS. 200 NAMPA, IDAHO 83687-8402 TEL. (208)466-9272 FAX (208)466-4405 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE I~ECEIVEI) FEB -1 2001 CITY OF 1VIERIDIAN FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these Findin s and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the ~ity Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must decide, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is important to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings before the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be prepared to state your position on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Plamung and Zomng Commission; and 2. That you carefully complete (be sure it is legg~'lble) the Position Statement if you disagree with the Findings and7~ecommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you prepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. It that is not possible, pplease present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The coppes will be presented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the City Attorney. If you are a part of a ggrroup, it is strongly recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, wFiich can be signed by the representative for the group. Very trul ours, City Attorney's Office lyi ~"`~ BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION In The Matter of The Request FOR REZONE of APPROXIMATELY 8.88 ACRES FOR PROPOSED AMBULATORY CARE CENTER Case No. RZ-00-010 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Applicant RECEIVED FEB -1 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN 1. The property is approximately 8.88 acres in size. The property is generally located at the southeast corner of Ten Mile Road and Cherry Lane, in Meridian. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is St Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, of Boise, Idaho. 3. The Applicant is owner of record. 4. The property is presently zoned as R-4, and is fallow agricultural. 5. The Applicant requests the property be rezoned to L-O. 6. The proposed site is surrounded by a church and residential subdivision to the north, a church and residential subdivision to the south, a residential RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 1 REQUEST FOR REZONE -AMBULATORY CARE CENTER - ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER r-~. ~ subdivision to the east and retail uses to the west. 7. The subject property is within the city limits of the City of Meridian. 8. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: construction of ambulatory care center. 10. The Applicant's requested rezoning of the subject real property as L-O is consistent with the commercial designation on the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Existing Urban. 11. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the rezoning as requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application. Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 1.1 The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 1.2 The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 REQUEST FOR REZONE -AMBULATORY CARE CENTER - ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER r ,..~ a. Any significant modifications to the subject site plan as approved by the City will require submittal of a new CUP application, whether or not the future use is permitted in the L-O zone. Significant modifications will include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. A pedestrian crossing through the landscape planter must be constructed to connect this row of parking with the bank if these stalls are required as part of the future bank site. 1.3 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 1.4 Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance 11-13 for use of undeveloped lots. 1.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 1.6 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 1.7 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 1.8 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.IC RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3 REQUEST FOR REZONE -AMBULATORY CARE CENTER - ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 1.9 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 1.10 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 1.11 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right-in/right-out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to accommodate the on-site median. 1.12 Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide and located outside of the public right-of-way. 1.13 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 4 REQUEST FOR REZONE -AMBULATORY CARE CENTER - ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 1.14 Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. 1.15 Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 1.16 Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACRD Construction Services staff. 1.17 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 1.18 Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane is prohibited. Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Recommendations\RZOlOStAls.wpd RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 5 REQUEST FOR REZONE -AMBULATORY CARE CENTER - ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER .-~ ** TX CONFIRi ION REPORT ** CITY OF MERIDIAN 1, DATE TIME TOiFROM 14 1222 10:40 PUBLIC WORKS 15 1222 10:41 208 888 6854 MAYOR Robert D, Come MODE MINiSEC PGS CMD# STATUS OF--S 00'18" 001 168 OK EC--S 00'27" 001 168 OK TS:80 00. ~ '3Q CITY COUNCIL MI.MS1rR5 Ron Anderson Keith Sird Tammy dewecrd Cherie McCandless AS OF DEC 22 'e,d 10:41 PAGE.01 FlUB OF TREASURE YA(.,LEY A Good Qlaee to Live OF MERIDIAN CITY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAFIO 83642 (20S) 858.4433 • Fax (208) 8S7-dSl3 Ctty Clcrk Office Paz (205) 38&x218 CEGgL DEP•1R7T9ENT (2U8)1S8.2ay9 • Fax 2$8.2501 PUBCiC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)S37.22II • FYa BS7.1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (ZOS) 88a.SS;; • fax 588.6$Sa TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Xoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Nail Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 10, 2001 Transmittal Date: December 1d, 2000 Hearing Oate: January 18, 2001 File No.; RZ Od-010 Request: Rezone of 8.88 acres from R~ to L-O for pro osed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center By~ RRS Architects Location of Property or Project: southeast corner Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Salty Norton, P2 Bill Nary, P/Z _ Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P2 Robert Cowie, Mayor `~ Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd. C/C Keith Bird, CIC Cherie McCandless, C/C Waler Department _~ Sewer Department Sanitary Service _~Building Department ~~ Fire Department :. ~~ Police Oepartmenl City Attorney. Ciry Engineer City Planner ___ Parks Department C+bP•S6 PPIFP/PFP-90 AZ-27 Meridian School Distrid ~_ Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District ~_~Community Planning Assoc. _ Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig, District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intemlountain Gas (F.P/PP) Ada County (finnexation) Idaho Transportation Department R~C'~~D DEC 2 2 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN LOiSga bbL6b8880Z=QI 2i31bM7.LSb'M NHiQI2i3H 9£:g0 AA-ZZ_Zi Your Concise Remarks: ** TX CONFIRP,, i0N REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 01 01/13 14.15 PUBLIC LJORKS 02 01/13 14:19 LEGAL DEPARTMENT 03 01/13 14 24 208 888 6854 ~. AS OF JAN 13 '~i 1428 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIRN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS OF--S 03'31" 011 139 OK EC--S 05'17" 011 139 OK EC--S 03'53" 011 139 OK . RECEIVED ~=w. JAN 12 2001 ~.~*- ADA COUNTY HIGI~WAY DzSTRICT crrY o~ l+~xlnz~ "~'~ Planning and Development Division ~~ Development Application Report ~"~ MCUP00-056/MRZ-00-O10 s/e/c Tei~ Mile RoadlCheny Lane Medical facility/bank This application has been referred to ACRD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. The applicant is requesting conditional use approval to build an ambulatory care center and ba,~k. The 8.8- acre site is located at the southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road. This development is ~~,; estimated to generate 1,520 additional vehicle trips per day (0 existing) based on the Institute of ,. Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. `~, Roads impacted by this development: Cherry Lane w"~` Ten Mile Road ACRD Commission Date -January 17, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. ~i r 7~Y°~ "~ ~~mi{ ~5 Aix •:.<s ;•, 1''wN1. M`'' n~~~ ~nl.Cl.,',t Mew k..,x:a Facts and Findings: McUPOaos6.~nn,~„ Pale 1 ~".: CITY CLERK FILE CHECKLIST Project Name: St. Als Ambulatory Care Center File No. RZ 00-010 Contact Name: Doug Racine Phone: 336-8370 Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Level: 0 a 0 Notes: Transmittals to agencies and others: Notice to newspaper with publish dates: Certifieds to property owners: December 12, 2000 Hearing Date: January l~ 2001 December 2"9 29-Dec-00 and 12-Jan-O1 December 29, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approve ^ Deny City Council Level: Hearing Date: ~=` i ~~~ ~- w ° i Transmittals to agencies and others: ~ ~' ~ L~-- Notice to newspaper with publish dates: ~ a'CG t and ~` ~ ~ (~ ~` G' ~ ^ Certifieds to property owners: ^ City Council Action: ^ Approve ^ Deny ^ Findings / Conclusions I Order received from attorney on: Findings /Conclusions /Order: ^ Approved by Council: _ ^ Copies Disbursed: _ ^ Findings Recorded ^ Copies Disbursed: Resolution No. ^ Recorded: Deadline: 10 days ^ Published in newspaper: Development Agreement: ^ Sent for signatures: ^ Signed by all parties: ^ Approved by Council: ^ Recorded: ^ Copies Disbursed: Ordin ance No. ^ Approved by Council: ResoYrtlons: Odpinal Res I Coq Carl: Minutebook Coq Res /Coq Cent: City Cbrk City Engineer city Planner Cily Attorney Sterkrg Coders Project File Coq Res J Original Ced: Ada Courdy (CPAs) Appicarn (non-CPAs) Recorded Ordinaneas: Original: MinWeeook Copies to: Cily Cbrk State tar Conan. State Treasurer, Aud'ROr, Assessor Sterkng Coders City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Project gb App5cant {ff appL) Findings f Orders: Origins[ Marutebook Copies to: AppkcaM Project fib City Engineer City Planner City Attorney Record Vxatbn Fetdkrgs "' RecoMed Oevebpment Agn»manh: OriglnatFireproot Fib copies to:Ap~card Project file City Ergineer Cily Planner City Attorney Notes: r-~ ~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR Robert D Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT . CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 10, 2001 Transmittal Date: December 14, 2000 Hearing Date: January 18, 2001 File No.: RZ 00-010 Request: Rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center By: BRS Architects t_ocation of Property or Project: southeast corner Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Your Concise Remarks: Fire Department Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FPlPP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 /'~ City of Meridian ANNEXATION/REZONE Application Checklist (Incomplete applications will not be processed) ~*~~ ~` ~~ ~~ C.'. ~'~ %~ ~~ Op f~jt 9 Applicant: St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Submittal Date: 11 / 29 / 00 Project: Ambulatory, Care Center - Cherry Lane & Ten Mile Road Application Completion Date: ~/ ~ ``~' /~ Hearing Date: ' ~ / ~ ` ~' / ~ °~, ! P&7JCC For Office Use Only _` Item No. Descri tion Comments (,f ) 1. Com leted and si ed Annexation/Rezone A lication ~~ 2. Warran deed 3. Notarized consent of titled ro owner s 4. Le al descri tion ~/ 5` A statement descnbing the characteristics which make zoning amendment desirable. '~~ 6. A statement outlining the necessity of desirability of development pertaining to the zoning amendment and harmony with adjacent develo ment 4f ~' A statement of how the proposed zoning amendment relates to the Ci of Meridian Co rehensive Plan -cite lic numbers. ~"~ 8 One (1) map at a scale of 1 "=100' of the property concerning the zo ' amendment. `~ 9. One 1 co of a vicini ma at a scale of 1"=300' M 10. List of ro owners within 300' v 11. A fee: Less than 1 acre - $400.00 Over 1 acre - $400.00 + $15.00 for each additional acre M ' ' s - $0.33 er notice; then multi 1 b two 2 ~,. 12. Pro a ostin affidavit 13. Notarized statement that the property was posted (to be submitted after st' , i. 1~~~~ _-- c~#3~ ~r~-~z.~a~-~ ",~-`~°~)~ ~~ti.(~ - -- ~,51~4,...~ ~y.~.. Ica-.~e-c-~ ~~-ti.~.~.~ ;~ 3 IZcw. l (1/?6~'O~l ,..~ ' CITY OF MERIDIAN '~ Planning & Zoning Department ~' I C 200 E. Carlton Ave., Ste. 201, Meridian, ID 83642 Z-oo- (208) 8845533 / (208) 888-6854 Fax --_~_.. (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance -Section 11-15 and 11-16) Ambulatory Care Center PROPOSED NAME OF PROJECT/SUBDIVISION:_St. Alphonsus Re Tonal Medical Center ADDRESS, GENERAL LOCATION OF SITE: Southeast Corner Cherry Lane & Ten Mile Rd . TYPE (RESIDENTIAL, INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL): Commercial ACRES OF LAND IN PROPOSED ANNEXATION/REZONE: 8. 8 8 acre s PRESENT LAND USE: Fallow agricultural PROPOSED LAND USE: n„tn~t i Pnt medical facility/bank PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT: R- 4 PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: L-O APPLICANT: St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center - Mike Ondracek ADDRESS: 1055 North Curtis Road, Boise, ID 83706 PHONE: 367-2394 FAX: 367-3967 E-MAIL: michondr@mailstn.sarmc. org ENGINEER, SURVEYOR, PLANNER: BRS Architects - Doug Racine ADDRESS: 1010 S Al 1 ntP P1 c~c~, ~ ii 1 nn, Rai ~P~ T1~ R37nA PHONE: 336-8370 E-MAIL: doug @brsarchitects . com OWNER(S)OFRECORD*: St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center ADDRESS: 1055 N. Curtis Road, Boise, ID 83706 PHONE: 367-2121 FAX; I have read the information contained herein and certify the correct. Signature fApplicant Doug cine, BRS Architects for *Annexation may require entering into a development agreement as a condition of exation. Current owner(s) must SARMC execute agreement. Explanation of any change in ownership and timing for same sha 1 be included in narrative. FAX: 336-8380 E-MAIL: Rev. 10/26/00 J~ ARCHITECTS 1010 S. ALLANTE PLACE, SUITE 100 BOISE, IDAHO 83709 TELEPHONE 208 336 8370 FAX 208 336 8380 Memo Date: 11/27/00 to: City of Meridian, Planning and Zoning Department Amy: Sherri Stiles /Brad Hawkins-Clark From: Doug Racine Re: Ambulatory Care Center Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Meridian, Idaho BRS No. 2K139 As part of our Rezone Application for the above referenced project, I am writing to address the following application requirements: 1) "A statement describing the characteristics of the subject property which make the zoning amendment desirable." Based upon its size, its relative location to Meridian's growth pattern and its frontage on both Cherry Lane and Ten Mile, two major arterial streets, this property is particularly suited for commercial or other non-residential development. The current R-4 zoning of this property would prohibit the type of development we propose. 2) "A statement outlining the necessity or desirability of development pertaining to the zoning amendment and its harmony with adjacent development." The rezone of this property to an L-O zone will allow our development to occur. By using existing roadways and infrastructure, we can provide a quality development that will serve the surrounding neighborhood and the community at large. As to compatibility with the surrounding property uses, the adjacent church to the south is also anon-residential use of a similar type and intensity to what we are proposing. Note also that the church to the north, across Cherry Lane, and the Albertson's store, to the • Page 1 west, across Ten Mile are certainly compatible land uses. Concerning the adjacent residential uses, we believe our proposal will act as a buffer to arterial traffic and existing and future commercial development. 3) "A statement of how the proposed zoning amendment relates to the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan". I assume for similar reasons noted in Items 1) and 2) above, the proposed June 2000 Draft of the Comprehensive Plan has indicated a change in this property's current residential zone to commercial. In reviewing the Draft, our proposed development meets many of the Plan's Objectives, some of which are as follows: a) We believe our proposed development and zone change to L-O is a less intensive land use than commercial and could help "maintain the integrity and ambiance" of the adjacent church and residential uses. b) We also believe this development helps meet the objective of "providing a variety of services and opportunities in the City of Meridian". c) Our development also meets the objective of "encouraging appropriate land uses along transportation corridors". d) Our development obviously meets the objective of "insuring that high-quality emergency care, primary, outpatient, home, and long-term care and other types of health care are provided in the community." Again, these statements are written in response to your Rezone Application Requirements. I hope you find them acceptable. Please call if you have any questions or comments. • Page 2 r~ Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center AFFIDAVIT To: City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Rezone and Planned Development Application Matter: Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center property located at North Ten Mile and West Cherry Lane; Meridian Idaho In accordance with the City of Meridian's requirements for a Rezone and Planned Development Application ("Application") for Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center's ("Saint Alphonsus") property located at North Ten Mile and West Cherry Lane, Meridian, Idaho, as more particularly described on the Warranty Deeds attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B (collectively the "Property") Saint Alphonsus agrees to the following; 1. Saint Alphonsus agrees to pay any additional sewer, water or trash fees or charges, if any, associated with the final approved use of the Property, whether that use be residential, commercial or industrial, 2. Saint Alphonsus and/or its agents will post the Property one week prior to the hearing on its Application stating that Saint Alphonsus has applied for the Application for the Property. Also, in accordance with the City of Meridian's requirements, as the titled owner of the Property, Saint Alphonsus consents to its agents making the necessary applications to secure planning and zoning approvals. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Inc., an Idaho nonprofit corporation f--. ,,, _-- _ -_~ ~~~ ~~ c ~~ Its: ,~.::~. 1055 North Curtis Road Boise, Idaho 83706-1370 X208) 367-2121 A Member of Holy Cross Health System ~ ~ State of Idaho ) ss. County of Ada ) On this day of November, in the year of 2000, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ~~ ,~-~~%~~r~ !~•`c~,~ ,known or identified to me to be the (~ ~ L~ of Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Inc., an Idaho nonprofit corporation, the corporation that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. .~`~~•qQ'~ l . Fq~~~ •'•. .cy ~,, y~ ~,oT~Rr ~~~ it * P U BLDG ~''•.~ TE OF ~~.•`~~ ~, ~ ~ Notary P b ~~o~r~t+daho Residing at Boise, Idaho My Commission expires wry, ~~, 0 4: iVOY. -28' 00 (TUE) 09:30 GIVE~~PURSLE T6L:248%=~8 I300 P. 003 P; 168815 JBlAH RECaJROE~ - REaUEST OF d0., CUllIiT7 RECQRDER ~;~F~;.-,1n~~;n FEEDEPUTY ' waRRAN-nr o 10 X 0 9 5 5 5 4 Zoos ~,o z7 ~ ~~ FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Robert H. Reynolds and Dolores R. Reynolds, husband and wife, Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Inc., an Idaho nonprofd corporation, Grantees, whose address is 1055 North Curtis Road. Boise, tQ 83708, the fallowing described real property, located in Ada County, Idaho, to wit: See Exhibit A Attached hereinafter referred to as the "Premises." TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Premises, with its appurtenances unto Grantees, Grantees Heirs, successors and assigns forever. And Grantor does hereby covenant to and with Grantees tfiat Grantor is the owner in fee simple of the Premises; that the Premises is free from all liens, claims and encumbrances except as set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and Incorporated herein; and that Grantor wfli warrant and defend the same from ail other lawful claims whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the undersigned have caused their names to be hereunto subscribed this ~d $y of November. 20QO. ~~ Robert }~, Reyn Ids Dolores R. Reynolds ~isi~~~- Warranty Deed-Reynolds November 30, '~C'DWl3~TStSo NOV. -28' OO (TUE~ 09 ~ 30 G(VEb~.PURSLE TEL: 208.-~88 I30O P. 004 INDIVIDUAL State of ldaho ~ ) ss. County of Ada ) On this '~ `~"riay of November, in the year of 20Q0, before rne, a lvotary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Robert H. Reynolds, known or identified to me to be the person wh~¢~ritit~~s subscribed to the within instn,rnent, and acknowledged to me that he exe~Lite. ~ .~~• a~t~r'•~; ~ ~ *' ~;= fi~• G . ., tip. ~'''%~4 TE Q~ ~ ::.. .... 1iVDIV:DUAL State of ldaho ) ss. County of Ada ) tY tary Public fo Idaho - esiding at ~~ o' o . ; ~~~. _ , My Commission e:cpires °~~~ - ~-!?~~ On this~~`*fday of November, in the year of 2000, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Dolores R.. Reynolds, known or ldentifed to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same. .••'~ ''• ~•`' ';~ ..• _ ~ ; ~G PUBL ~~ .~ . ..~..~ , • . ,~ ~~~ ~-~ t , . N~ ry Public ~'or Idaho R iding at ~a~ra ~ o ` J ~ ~G My Cotnmisslon e.Kpires .=~ - ~ ~ .~,, ~[;~~~ Warranty Deed-Reynolds Nwernber 3a, 2080/~3T751S4 NOV. -28; 00(TUE) 09:30 G(UEN~IRSLE TEL~20¢--~88 1300 P. 005 FILE ~NO.: P188B15/ ~ 17Q f ~-r !~~ EXHIBIT A A TRACT OF LANG IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, 60ISE MERIOIAN, ADA COU~tTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCIMQ AT TF{E SECTION CORNEA COMMON TO SECTIONS 2,3,10 AND 11 OF TDWNSNIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, AOA COUNTY, IDAHO, FRDM WHICH POINT THE HOR1'H 1!a CORNER OF SAIb SECTION 11 BEARS SOUTH 89 DEGREES 03'40" EAST, 2653.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 OEC,AEES 00'00" WEST ALONG 7HE 1NESTERI,Y BOUNDARY LINE OF SALO SECTION 11 A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SECTION LINE SOUTH 89 DEGAEE5 03'40' EAST, ~k5.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH H9 DEGREES 03'40" EAST, G81,1A FEET TO A STEEL PIN; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES Ofl'QO" EAST 248.97 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIG1~tT OF WAY LINE OF CHERRY LANE AS DE5CRIHEO IN wAAaANTY DEED, RECORDED AS I~1STAlJMENT N0. 94036123, APRIL 19, 1994; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 07x31' WEST {FORMERLY 88 DEGREES 55'33" WEST) ALONG Sp.ID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 650.66 FEEj,' THENCE SOUTH 4a OEGR£ES 30'x5' WEST (FORMERLY SOUTH a~a DEGREES 55'31" WEST} 43.47 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE VMEBTERLY LINE OF SAID WARRANTY DEED DESCRIPTION; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00'00" WEST (FORMERLY SOUTH 00 DEGRE°_S 24`46" WEST) 216.74 FEET ALONG SAIa WESTEFLY LINE T4 THE ROINT OF 6EGINNING. END OF LEGAL DESCAxPTION Tax Parcel Ko. S1Z12Z23092 NOV. -28. 00 (TUE) 04 ~ 30 GI VEND--QURSLE TEL ~ 204-,^88 1300 p, 000 EXHIBIT B 1. General tares for the year ?400, which are liens. arc not yet due and payable. ?. Sewerage charges and special assessment powers of the City of Meridian. 3. Lions and assessments of the following district and tha rights and powers Thereof as pravidcd by law. District: Nampa Meridian Irrigation District (343-1884) 4. An easement containing certain terms, conditions anti provisions affecting a portion of said premises and far the purposes stated herein for: The purpose of slope to grade ad}acent to roadway improvements !tr T'avor Ot; Ada County Highway District Retarded: .4.pri11 x,1994 Insttvtncat No: 94063114 ' ~~ Mothers disclosed by ALTA/ACSM survey prepared by Anderson-David dt Associates, Inc. dated Apri126, 2flA0 vndcr prpject no. 4D-133. NOV. -28' 00(TUE- 0931 GIS~E~URSLE TEL~208.3'~8 1300 p, 007 p-iaeaib .;s1x~i • ~ (~EC3ROE0-REQU£5T OF • ~.R;, r.UU"QTY RE~Or?cE~ ~~.DH;i,';!3 ts~;1:,f~R!~ FCE~D PUTY_ ID00 ~ WARRANT j EED ~ ~ Q Q ~ ~ S 5 PtpNEER 1171 -~ FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Ouang The Da and Thuy Thi Do, husband and vrife, Grantors, do hereby grant, bargain, self and eonvey unto Saint Aiphonsus Regional Medical Center, Inc., an Idaho nonprofit corporation, Grantees, whose address is 1©55 North Curtis Road. Boise, !D 83706, the following described real property, located in Ada County, Idaho, to wit: See Exhibit A Attached hereinafter refer-ed to as the "Premises." TO HAVE AND Ta HOLp the Premises, with its appurtenances unto Grantees, Grantees' heirs, successors and assigns fQrever_ And Grantor does hereby covenant to and with Grantees that Grantor fs the owner in fee simple of the Premises; that the Premises is free from all liens, claims and encumbranczs except as set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein; and that Grantor will warrant and defend the same from all other lawful claims whatsoever. iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused theirnamesto be fiereur~to subscribed th~s .",mot' l_ day of (November, 2000. 1 Q ~ Quang The Do Thuy Thi Do' EXHIBIT ~' WARRANTY DEED 371!A5Q1tNw 13,24+)0 NOV. -28' 00(TUE) 09:31 G1VE!~.PURSLE TEL:?08,~R8 1300 P. 008 ALI.•PURp05E t1CKNC1NlEDGM~N7 State of CALIk'ORi~iZP1 %nunty0f L•C},S At~c~r. ;e• Gn 11 ! 31 / 2 0 0 obetore ma, .L'r~ rl.~.s~~_-C.s o-r~a~~~~~-3.~~LLhlir . p:.:c /CArE. TI'R OF OFFIO c .NMI: DOG 1s)T Y PVaLIC persol~aUy appeared QUANG THE DO , N~MEIS3 of SK,NER(37 ~ parsonaf)y known to me • OR -improved to me on the basis of satisfacWt evidence to be the parOCn(s} whasQ name(s) is/are eubsctibad 1o the wllhln instrument and ac• knowledped to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies}, and that by his/her/their signaturo(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon blt'halt of which the ,.. ,~ CARLOS R. OSOR{O = person(s) acted, executed the instrument. tI ' COMM. #128165 a ' d NQTA ftY PIJBLCr - t-AIIFOANIA ~ ^ Nala~ r f,PTtOMAL SECTIi]N ~~ CAPACITY CLAIMED 9Y SIGNER Tnouplt st;Nto doaa nor nqutro Ina Naary ro till In the daea below, 4otn9 90 may prove Ilnral118h1a to permna rsiyinp act the dacynaru. ^ lND1VIt?UAL o CCHPORATE o~lc~{s) n~t=~ PARTNER(S) ~ WMITED GENERAL [' ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [~ TAUSrEE{s) GUAADIANJCaN9ERVATOR OTHER: SIGNER iS RfPR~SENTING: _ " ~ cos Awr,Ea,~s cournr ~ W1TiV SS my hand and officia(.Seal. Ncu~cFOFae~~-+t>pa-~c+r-Ttit~sl hnY Curnm. i:><piros 1rC,r ~ t. 2Q04 Ji ~ SIGTW1TtJ~MOINOYAHY - .- o~Tlol~l. sl:cnoN Trlls cEATIFlCATE MURT 8E ATTACHED TO TITLE O!~ TYPE OF DOCUMENT THE DOCUMENT DE5CRI®t'sD AT RIGHT: 7hcugh Ihs dale rsgwuad Hera is nol rs4uGsd by klw, II could pre~an! (Jaudulant raatiac1pr10rlt 01 tnr. tomt. NuMBEFi ol= PACsES ~_ DATE OF' DOCUt~At?PiT s1GN>:a(sl QTHEFI THAN AtAMlca A80VE ALL•PUAPOSE 5tateof CALIFORNIA County of Ln~ >-~Fr.xs_ - - Qr..1i12~ /2or1o t-,atoreme,.~.A~.O.;L A• Jeoria, A NQ ar~Publir_~ OATS IMM[, TITLE OF OPrtCER • EG.. 'JAN! 73A % PU8L1C' personally appeared Thuy Thi. DD waactst of stcnEats~ ' ^ personally known to me- OR -improved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) i2/are subscribed to th® wahin instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed tt12 same fn histherlthelr authorized capaclty(ies), and that by hls/htirltheir N.. st ~ OPTIONAL SECTIDH ~~ CAPAACITY CLAIM>~ BY SIGNER Tnou~h seam does nOr roawro the NDtrlly ro IM IR the data below. tlsing :n mtY p~'a InvNuabta t0 parlone rah~9 ao Ina dpp+manL INDIVIDUAL ' CORPOAATti OFFICER{9) *-n.stsl PA~iTNER{5) Q uM~TEa (] GENERAL ^ ATTORKI;Y-IN-FACT TAUci fEE(SI 0 GUAFiDIANICON&ERVATOR siQneture(s) on the.lnstrument the person(sj, ^ OTMPA: fir. GAR(AS .4.O~OI~Id (~ ~~~~ COMM. ~1~131623 I or the entity upon behalf of which the a :~m . ' NC1T~fi°r' PU81,IC • CAl.lp(~RNIA ~ person(s) acted, axaeut8d the irtstarrtrnt. T cos ~.taacLt:s cnu+~lTr ~ SIGNER 19 REPRESENTING: ~r~ Gclntn E>tpires Nov. tt. 2L1oi " lyALtE ec oEASONtst oa t;NTm(IE+h ~~c..-w..~~.>r-~-~-'~,-.-w~•-w-~--~ WITfY 8 jmy hind artd o~cia~~. • - S14nATUiLF QF' MCi7A}r~ - OP7fOl~Al. SEC7lOF! i rll5 CERTIFICATE MUST 8E ATTA%tiED TO T1TL6 OR TYP£ OF DOCUMENT THt: DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT R1rNT: T:ttugh the dais rsgt+estld Hero 1a n01 ftywlrod ty taw, r, e0u+u t)N:wnrit vwautanl naQaenment el :h-a fom+. NUMBER OF PAGES Dr*TE aF DOCUMENT S+t3NER(S7 OTHER THAN No,MED ABOVE gat 9ti2 N~Ttt]N~L Nr3rAFY ASSOCIaTICM • n33'c Fwmma ave., P.A. Box 71$4 • C~napa Park, C.'- 87309-' ~ NOV. -28: 00 ~TUEJ 09 ~ 31 GIVENS-~IIRSLE TEL ~ 208-~88 1300 P. 009 FILE N0. ; F1SBt3j61~0 E'~THIBIT A A PORTiOrI OF THRT PARTICULAR PARGEL OF I~4N0, LYI!`IG IN THE NORTFiN1EST QUARTER OF SECTItIn 11 , TOV'JNS}iIP 3 NOf~TH, RANGE 1 WEST, 60ISE MERIDIAN, P.DA COUNTY, ID~.liO, DESCRIBED Irl YNE DUITGI.AIM DEED A5 INSTRUMENT N0. 7942588 IN THE OFFICE OF 7Ht: ADA COUNTY F~ECOP.DER {RECOAO£^ 3 AUGUST, 19?S}, SAID PORTION OF flROUNO BEING d~DRE PARTICULARLY DESGR13E7 AS FOLLOWS: COMME"lCING AT T~lE NORTH 4UAR7'Efi GORNER OF SECTION 11, Towr~sKzp 3 ~tORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MEr~IDIAPJ, AOA COUPtTY, ZDAHt}, FpQM WHICH THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 2, 3, 1Q AND 11 HEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 43'40' WEST 2653,23 FFET; THENCE ALONG T}iE NQI~TN LINE OF SAIp SECTION 11, MOPTH 89 DEGREES 03'x0` WEST, 1927.08 FEET TNENGE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 00 DEGREES Qo'OO' WEST, 51.03 FEET TO a POINT Oil THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-of-waY LINE OF CHERRY LJt~tE AS DE5CRI9ED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AS INSTAU~IENT NQ. 94017581, FEBRtTARY 25, 1994; THENGE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LIME, SOUTH 00 DEGREES OQ`00° YVEST 523.fl9 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8q DEGREES 20'00" EAST, 416.35 FEET; THENCE DiORTH 00 dEGREES 00'00" EAST 522.38 FEET TO ~. POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE Of SAIQ WARRANTY OEEO dESCRIPTION; T?iEMCE ALartc SAID RIGHT OF 1VAY LIME rIORTH 89 DEGREES 07'31' WEST, x16.37 FEET ALOPIG SKID SOUTHERLY LSNE TO ThE POINT OF BEGINNIriG. ENb QF l.EtiAL oESCRxPTZON Tam Parcel Kn. S121I2230Z2 NOV. ` 18' 00 (TUEI O9 ~ 32 GIVE~Ys.,PURSLE TEL_ i'O8,s.88 1300 P. 010 I:~CAI'BIT B PERtitT'T'T~D E?CCEPTipNS t. General taxes for the year 2000. which are liens, are nat yet due and payable. ?. Seweragt charges and special assessment powers of the City of Meridian. No special assessments now show of record_ 3. Liens aad assessments ofthe following district and the rights and powers thereoFas provided b_y law. District: Nampa iVleridian Irrigation District (343-15847 d. Aq easetnc`nt containing certain te,~rms, conditions and provisions affectin ; a portion of Said premises and for the purposes stated herein F'or: The purpose oFslopc to Srade from back of sidewalk In favor of: Ada County 1-lighway District Recorded: Febniary 36, ] 994 Tnstntn,ent No.: 94017582 5. iVtatt~rs disclosed by ALTA/ACSM Survey prepared by Anderson-David ~. Associates, Inc., dated April 26, 2000 under Project No_ 00-133 txh,bic h - PcrmitteU Facccpti~,ns S~.C1.iF.l~TS~i?1~ksOtEt.~ 1'emriuad r'xeepdona-,~ ANDERSON-DAVID "°+~ ASSOCIATES, INC. corner of Ten Mile and Cherry A parcel of land located in Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11 of Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho from which point the North 1/4 corner of said Section 11 bears South 89°03'40" East a distance of 2653.23 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West along the westerly boundary line of said Section 11 a distance of 300.00 feet; thence leaving said Section line South 89°03'40" East a distance of 45.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°03'40" East a distance of 681.14 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West a distance of 274.92 feet; thence South 89°20'00" East a distance of 416.35 feet; thence North 00°00'00" East a distance of 522.38 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way line of Cherry Lane; thence along said southerly right-of-way line, North 89°07'31" West a distance of 1067.02 feet; thence South 44°30'45" West a distance of 43.47 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of Ten Mile Road; thence along said easterly right-of-way line South 00°00'00" West a distance of 216.74 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 386,613 square feet or 8.88 acres more or less. Land Surveying Services 1401 Shoreline Drive, Boise, Idaho 83702 208.363.0058 fax 208.363.0800 Parcel name: 1 North: 9818.9918 Line Course: S 89-03-40 E North: 9807.8306 Line Course: S 00-00-00 W North: 9532.9106 Line Course: S 89-20-00 E North: 9528.0663 Line Course: N 00-00-00 E North: 10050.4463 Line Course: N 89-07-31 W North: 10056.8027 Line Course: N 89-07-31 W North: 10066.7356 Line Course: S 44-30-45 W North: 10035.7373 Line Course: S 00-00-00 W North: 9818.9973 East 9023.4189 Length: 681.14 East 9704.4675 Length: 274.92 East 9704.4675 Length: 416.35 East 10120.7893 Length: 522.38 East 10120.7893 Length: 416.37 East 9704.4678 Length: 650.65 East 9053.8936 Length: 43.47 East 9023.4183 Length: 216.74 East 9023.4183 Perimeter: 3222.02 Area: 386,613 sq. ft. 8.88 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0055 Course: N 05-59-15 W Error North: 0.00550 East -0.00058 Precision 1: 585,821.82 ~~ ._ ~.,. ~9',t ' .,u ~ ~V L,~~~~; n~ ~~~~~r o ,~ w~ • /; j• ~,;~. ~,;~. ~,;~. ~,;~. 1 I I i ' R /PJSOd 1 JSOg~, ~g02/~;,' O/JO R P`~6°g PI 3S°g~, HBO?~ ~ O/~O ~fsog~ I q Sogzj J go~~o 1- o,/o RfSOg~ 1 R3SOg~, c''O ~ O g0 O~0 NJSOg~ 1 g3SOg~' g0?SO ~ 0090 q3 m R3SOg I SOg~~ O~ 2g0?6.~ 0060 ~: R S ~ 3S °g~go 1 °g~,o ?~~ ~~o v % qJS SO I Ogg) B1gO~g 0060 R R,t50g~60~9~ .fS0g~,00S0 .-. I NORTH -~- ~,_ J ~~~ TEN MILE ROAD g III R~so R3SO 9~s N ~ ~ , g~'oa g2jo/9 od?~ 1 ~ ~ O O . OS 1 N O o ~~SOgc'> , R3Sgg?~ ~ q Jsog ~ N O? 060 ~~ ~ 1)O . ~ J`s ~ 'Q3 J 'P s $ Oo~, _ sos~ ~ DSO o? ~o~ g?, JO Oy R J30 v RJS ~ ~.~ m. ~~~ . ~~ E ..36.6 . ~~. S _ ~% e?~02 Og?~O~ Og2 J ~, ~„ U N m w ~ ~ .. e ~P ~ N ti N 4 N N ~~ .TJ I r~ ~SOOe' R3SOg I ~JSO f °o° ~ ~ ° ° a m ° ° ,uee o N . N ~ v N (P ~O~ ?j0/ g2j p A G O O ,~y N 1 t Jp O A ~ .... .... O 4 ...... ..., O I I ~ I: ~6 U O O+ ~ P`tS0 .o R3S ?J °' f 'pt .- P 'P.T3, ~ ~' ~J3, ~. g °g s so "s ?j0~ ~~O/y Ogg, e~.i 08~ Ogg, 00~~ jfx~ _ p ~ O~ O ~ Od OJ °' ___ ____- `TSO JS ~~~ ~~~ ,p ~'~~ 16ov 6°g~ ~'s~g ~36~g I s°~ `~ ~~?> 1 4 O O i v PJ ,O - ~ BO 90 ds t .~ ~ ds SO 1 ~,O'?d ~ tD OJ/O ~ ~ s R _ _ _....... ~ ~ I ~ - Og?> I dSOg~ ........... ... O1 sOOg ~~ ~~ ~' ~ - .. ... 1 O .. .. .. .....__ . ... .......... . .. ...... ., f _....A.. ~`tJ0 ro ~JS ~Jy. ~`lS '. ':~~ O ~~„ 1 w u O u .. U O CO ~ ?6 2 ~ 0 1 0 o m a ~ yS '. ~/ O ~O ~' ~ N N N N V g?, 1 Ogg Og Oe ~ ~ ~ 0 0 1 ~ 1 ~ o sent ey: ; r 208 8H8 6854; NOV-21 -00 4:04PA~1; ST. ALAS P~OP~ OWNE~tS WlTlrij~j 300' 5'i' AL1i11UNSUS AI:Ci MLD CEN INC 1055 NCURTIS RD BOISEID 63'706-1309 1635 N~:TEN MILE RD CHARTERS ROBERT L & CHAR'~ERS PHYLLIS R 3280 SUGAR CIZELK DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 SOU'1'C~f:RN iDANO (;nRP(~RATION SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST 7777 Ft1IRViEW AVE BOISI,? ~ lll 83704-8418 W CHERRY AVE Dn&.I~ 501 SE ;COLUMBIA SHORES BLVD S'TE 300 VANCOUVER WA 98661-0000 W CHERRY LN JOSEPH ROBERT JR & 3012 ~ ANN ST MLRIUTAN ID 83642-1]79 SCIIUIiT2: VAUGHN E & AUDREY J 2996 W! AN N S'I' MERIDIAN ID 83642-1179 HANF~' RUBElti' B 6542 N FOX RUN AVL: MERLIDIAN Ill 83642-5196 2978 ~' ANN ST YARRENGTON J ALAN & Y_ARR~NGTON DIANE $ 2940 V7 ANN ST MERIDIAN 1I~ 83642-0000 DEAV$RS ROGP.R W & BEAVERS CIIRISTY 13 2930 ~? ANN ST MER11;1CAN ID 83642-1177 MACF~OS MICHAEL D 1679 N~ VL(;'I"GRAVE MERIDIAN Ili 83642-1184 VRIiA JEFFREY L & JUL1H It 2$92 ~ AN N 51' MBRI,L;JiAN 11.3 83642-1177 HURST JERRY B & DANETTE 2860 W ANN ST MERIDIAN ID fl3642-1177 IALKA BARRY L 1662 N MORELLO AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-1187 SMITH CHARLES L & TERESA E 1653 N VICTOR AVP, MERIDIAN Ill 83642-1 1 84 1dANKS WILLARD N JR & HANKS 1.EONA G 3057 W ANN Si' MERIDLAI~t ID 836421180 HENDLRSON PI IILIP D L & GABBLE 2835 W ANN ST MERIDIAN ID 83442-1178 GENTATIiUMAS F. & GENTA STACEY J 3039 W ANN ST MERIDL!1N ID 83642-1180 PUGMLRE JE.F'FREY S & PAMELA 3015 W ANN ST MERIDIAN ID 8.3642-1180 Ai~TKENMAiV MICHAI:?AI. El & ANKF,.NMAN DENICE D 2993 W .ANN ST MERIDIANN ID 83642-1180 DURFF-E SHAD C & }~UR}'~}?r~ JENNY M 2851 W ANN ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-1178 C~UDGELL LINDA R 2971 W ANN ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 SUNBURST IiOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 3775 CASSIA ST BOISE ID 83705-2225 W CHERRY AVE N BING AVE W ANN ST Pape 2 sent sy: ; /'~ FISCIlTrR ROSAI.,Ii~ E 2935 W,' ANN SI' MERI.I"~IAN ID 83642.4142 DIANI~A DEBRA S BRADI~URN DAVID J 2867 W` ANN ST hLERII~]AN IU 83642-1178 HANSIr1V PENNY I_ 28G9 W ANN ST' MERIIIAN Ill 83642-1178 ALBEI}.TSONS INC PO Box 20 BOISE SID 83726-0000 3311 W CI-IERRY LN REYNQLDS ROBERT H ttc DOLORES R S03b B~.L AIR S'L' BOISEID A3705-2701 N TE?IJ MIL.E? RD DO Qi,}ANG TI IE & THUY THI 4319 Pll.i IURST AVL? I3ALD~VIN PARK CA 91706-2653 W C:HIrRfiY Ai'E S I DFVELUFMENT INC 3350 t~1SERICANA TER STE 200 BOISEID 63706-2502 N (;LAItA AVE REYNpLDS CHRISTINA A 2828 Wf LBROY CRT MERIDIAN YD 83642-0000 ADY TAMMY S 2624 W! I.ERC-Y CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-4351 GREIF~ LORI I. 2812 ~!' i.RROY CT MERlU1.AN TU 83642-4351 BYINCTTON DARKEN K 2790 VU LEROY CT MEKII~lAN ID 8364211350 THIES~ GREGaORY G & THIES;~ ROSE: 2827 ~ LEROY CT MIiRII?IAN ID 83642-4351 208 8B8 6854; NOV-21-00 4:04PM; SKOGSBERG STF1'I•IEN C ~c LALLISS-SKOC',.SBI?RG LISA L 2813 W LEROY CRT MERIDIAN ID 83642-4351 ZURITA JOSI; LUiS & ZURITA ANGELICA 1519 N HAVEN COVE AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642^4330 WASI)1?N TOUI) G WASDLN MISI•IELLB D 8374 S DANSKIN LN I4IERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 2825 W LEROY CRT CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS 50 E NORTH TP.MPI.E ST FL 22 SALT .LA KF. CiTY U'i' 641 SO-0002 N TEN MILE RD PLUMLEY N NAOMI & PLUMLHY RODNEY S 2826 W LEONARD CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-4356 DUMAN CORY & ROMAN JACQUL,iNF, 2814 W LEONARD C'1' MERIDIAN ID 83642-4356 KLEIN CURTIS A & KI.EIN KEL.LEEN J 1485 N HAVEN COVE AVE MERIDIAN ID 63642-4331 GLOVER STEVE ROY & GLOVER ANGLE MARIE: 28.'10 W LEONARD CT MERIDIAN ID 836424356 MERCER CHERI S AND KNUTT CHARL$S H & NANCY G 2829 W LEONARD CRT MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 Al_LCA'IT SLIANON M 2815 W I.L?ONARD CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-4356 SCI INI!IDIiR MICI IAF,.I. SEAN 1443 N HAVEN COVE AVL MI?RIDI,AN ID 83642-4331 Pege 3 sent By: ; iJRTA~ LUIS A & URIAS~ MARIA P 2827 Q'~ LIiUNARD CT MirRTIJIAN ID 83642-4356 ALLEItiT ALICE A BRUN~R KARLN C ] 389 I~ CLARA AVE MERII~LAN 1D $3642-4355 BARN~Y MARY R 3933 aP HARBOR!'O1N"i' UR MERIDIAN Ill 83642-WOU 2960 ~ SI IERYL S'I' HUIT ;j992 REVOCABLB TRUST 7461 I~STICK NAMP1~1 iD 83687-0000 1456 N'TLN CvIILE RD SANDER JILL E 2946 W SHERYL ST MERTIjTAN TD 83642-0000 MINCMBcGDLLAND h[1N DORIS YUN HAO 2915 I:AND WEHR RD NORT~3 BROOK IL 60062-0000 2920 W' SHETI.YL ST biACE!GARI.A 2892 W!` SIiERYL ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 BARNI~Y Y R 3933 VV~ URPOINT DR MERI AN ID 83642-0000 2856 SII~?iLYL S'I' ROSEII JOHN MCKINLY & ROSEPiT ROSE LEE 2832 W" SHERYL S'I' MERIDIAN ID 83642-4353 FIOFMAN ROBERT"T' & HO1~rAIV C JERELYN 2810'W SHERYL ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-4353 THOMPSON SFiIRLEY 4 2774 ~ SII f? RYL S1' MERIDIAN ~D 83642-4326 KOCHBRYAN D 1377 N<ZARA AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-4355 20H 888 6854; Nov-21-DO 4:04PM; Page 4/7 r~ S'1'ON:FHUUSE EVANGELICAL CORD 1450 N TEN MILE RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5404 BURDETT PATRICK RENO-BURDETT KIMBERLY 2949 W SHERYL ST MERIDIAN 1D 83642-0000 13ERGESON GREGORY D tSc BERGESUN Br1RB,ARA M 2923 W SHERYI. ST MERIDIAN ID 83642353 KIMBROUGH CHRISTOPHER ll & KIMBROUGH I~#UREI.. A 2895 W SIIBRYL S"1' MERIDIAN ID 83642-4353 YAN(.EY LEONARD P & YANCEY SHARON A 2859 W SHERYL ST MI~.RTDIAN TD 83b42-4353 PIKE BRETT L & PiKI? AIVGTI? C 2835 W SHERYL ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-4353 LONG RAYML D & LONG WT:.NDY S 2813 W SIIERYL ST MERIDIAN ID 83642.4353 ELSEY DAVID M & ELSEY GINGER R 2783 W SHERYL ST MP,.RIDIAN II) 83642-4326 ALLEN RICHARD K JR 1349 N CIARA AVE ML~RlDIAN Ill 83642-4355 llWONCH JOfIN T & DWONCH LESA M 2948 W WILLARD S'I' MERIDIAN ID 83642-4357 MOORS RUSSELL C 2922 W W1I.I.ARD ST MERIDIAN ID 83642.4357 SIMMONS JON T' & IZATT-SIMMONS JANA LEE 2894 W WILLARD ST MERIDIAN ID 63642-4357 oc i ~ Dy: JOHNSTON STEVE V & JUFIN$TON TANIA S 2858 V9 W[LF,ARD ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-4357 BARK$DALE DELYN R & B~AAK~DALE DONNA M 2834 Vii WILLARU S7 MERII~Ir1N iD 83642-4357 MA~ISC SHANF. A & MA~~ M1cH~L.r,E A 2812 ~ WILLARD ST MERIDIAN ID 8,'id42j}357 H.ANSEN MICI TALL & HANSEN Ju.r, w i:i31 N` Ca.ARA AV}3 MERIDIAN ID 83642-4355 ,~ Zoe eee 6e54; NOV-21-00 4:05PM; Page 5/7 .~ ~1ir l~ ~ i~Y ~ l ILA IF . C !,r. ~ i_ri_fII~L ~i '~I ~~i~~~l ~ f f lkl~l l._ v I; i I ~ i T~~. ~' r' J4' I~~ ~~{C 1-111 ill ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,-~ ,I ~ I,'- ~ J _ 1 J~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ i ~ ''-I, -~ v~, 1I ~ ; L~ ~;; ~~ `>~ ~--, _ ~n ~~-; rr~~ ,aar_~ -~~r, ~---- >. ~4 ~- _~ ~~, f ~ ~a - ._ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ Y ~ ~ ~`~~ 6~ 3 F ~~ ~ ~$ C~ 'R fuo ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ a~ ~" L. `~' ~ L" gR ~~ g SQ8 ~ I m,6U5. ~ ~ S BS o~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ' S' 8L"~y ~~ ; S' ~iSF RA € z tl Ym'>n \ ~ ~ ra 8 C "a mfg m3~ M ~6 P£ ~ ff$ S = ~8 P ~ ~ F °~ ~ ~~ ~ 3 Y ~ : NM~_ 3E~ Y $~p~ e v~ $p a ~ N ~/i 8 0 ~~v$~A ~~~~ g~~~q ~~ l #mo3 ~ ~ y~gi~ m 5 ~ dam ~ ~ : ~~ o~` i o ~g N~, 1 ~_ ~~ i ~~ ~~~~~~F ~~ ~~~~ ~m~ ~$ I~ S ~€eF -.~~ fi ~ &ss~ ~ s v~# Y a.;~g,as~~~ c~~x amp a~ i' O"'o%~o% E a~ € a ~o~~~~s~ ~~~~ i~ 92 § m ~ s >x N i n~iz ZI ~~ O rri D a 1 ~` n i... -: Ri } z T ~T1 tj m D A C'i i1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AMBULATORY SERVICES CENTER ~ 1~'~ ~"~'~ "` eon wwo erx» ~ Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center ' ~ ,, ,~1' ~' r~ s~o ciQ~AAR w7fl AtID iPx nmE ~w~r~, mup ARCHITECTS MA81~ 31H DEV0AA1@7f I7.iN D N ~ N m O N ,7C ~, D Z ~c Q ~. r` ° 2 a C) ~ av. !.yn.. ~ O ~ ~ ~ (p rt ~ ~ 1 r, < N ~, is ^ ~~{kkk ~ ~ , ~ ~; ,. ~ ~~ ~ ~~ <• +~ ~ ~ A ~ : a ~ .~ ~ o~-, ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~. ~ D N W r0 W o c 0 ~. ^ 1 ~ ~ 1 1 _ y m ~ ~ ~ f9 ~ o .. O ~ D X > r ~ 0 r^ r ~ t - _ _ _ _ _ - ~ 1 ~ 1 . t7 ~ _ C m ~ 7 W ~ O m ~ '11 ~a~ ~ c 0 0 ~ ~ N ~ ~v a Z ~~ ~_ l/ --. BRS ARCHITEC ~ S 1087 W. RIVER ST., STE. 160 PH. 208-336-8370 BOISE, ID 83702 KEYBANK NAF'wNAL ASSOCIATION 15 8 4 8 BOISE MHO 83701 92-~~5-1241 CHECK DATE 11 / 2 9 / 0 0 PAY --Five Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars and Eighteen Cents-- TO City of Meridian AMOUNT- $ S 68.18 -- E II'OL584811' i:L24LOL555i:01 X07525 811' BRS ARCHITECTS 15848 Rezone Application BRS Project SARMC - Meridian #2K139 `L~~ OEWXE BUSINESS FOFMS 1+800-32B-0304 ' ~ KEYBANK NAT~NAL ASSOCIATION 15 8 4 9 BRS ARCHITEG eols '\HO 83701 1087 W. RIVER ST., STE. 160 PH. 208-336-8370 9~ ~ 1241 BOISE, ID 83702 CHECK DATE 11/29/00 PAY --Five Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars and Eighteen Cents-- i i 6 L TO City of Meridian AMOUNT --$568. 18-- F] - -- II' O L 5 8 4 9 II' ~: 1 2 4~ O i 5 5 5 ~: O l 10 7 5 2 5 8 II' -_ ---_--_-__--____-_---_--,__-_ BRS ARCHITECTS 15849 Planned Development Application BRS Project SARMC - Meridian #2K139 ~~ OELUXE BUSINESS FORMS i +800-328-0304 ,-., ~-.. CITY OF MERIDIAN "Hub of Treasure Valley" 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 888-4433 ustomer's IS ~~ ~~. Order No. Date ~ ~Ly ~0~ Name ~ j~YC{2i /~C~f~ Address Phone: SOLD BY 6A5t~ L C~~7D. ~~ l o Vl / ~ ~ CHARGE ON ACCT. MDSE. RETD. PAID OUT y~y ~, , ~ ~~CC JJ ~~ ~ 3:3 X Z ~ 1 ~ O ~ . ~. P r- ~Q~~d ~~~ ~a ~ ~ ~ I -- ~~ ~ . 3 3 XZ ~ i1g ~- I I I I All claims and returned goods MUST be accompanied,by this bill cei d TAX I ve 0 012 411 By TOTAL a l3 ~ ~ .3-~ UJ-CV L-L ~~~//q~/q/J y~~//J~~ PRINTED IN U.S.A. ~ PNINTFO WITH ~(/ , `w ,/`/ ~ SOYINK 6tA~ August 16, 2002 RZ 00-010 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUgUSt 20, 2002 APPLICANT BRS Architects ITEM NO. ~' REQUEST Ordinance No. Request to rezone 8.88 acres from an R-4 zone to an L-O zone for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center -- enutheast corner of West Cherry Lane and North Ten Mile Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Contacted: COMMENTS See Attached Ordinance ~, ~ Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. RESOLUTION OF THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RELATING TO THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHEREAS, the Meridian Development Corporation, the duly constituted and authorized urban renewal agency of the City of Meridian, Idaho (hereinafter "MDC"), has submitted a proposed Urban Renewal Plan entitled "Meridian Revitalization Plan" (the "Plan") to the City of Meridian and the City Council, and the Mayor has referred the Plan to the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission for review and recommendations concerning the conformity of said Plan with the Comprehensive Plan known as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian; WHEREAS, the staff of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said Plan and has determined that it is in all respects in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission met on the day of , 2002, to consider the Plan; WHEREAS, the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said Plan in view of the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the Plan, submitted by the MDC and referred to this Commission by the City Council for review, is in all respects in conformity with the Comprehensive General Plan. Section 2. That the Director of the Planning and Zoning Division by and hereby is authorized and directed to provide the Meridian City Council with a certified copy of this Resolution relating to said Plan. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. PASSED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this day of , 2002. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Director, Planning and Zoning Division (Meridian~rsolutns-P&Z resolution) NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO CONSIDER THE MERIDIAN REVITALIZATION PLAN OF THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MERIDIAN Notice is hereby given that the Meridian City Council, will hold, during its regular meeting of October 8, 2002, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., a public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, to consider an ordinance approving the Meridian Revitalization Plan (the "Plan"), of the Meridian Development Corporation (the "MDC"). The boundaries of the Plan area and Project area are generally described below. The Plan proposes that the MDC undertake urban renewal activities pursuant to the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965, as amended, Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code (the "Law"). The Plan being considered for adoption contains a revenue allocation financing provision pursuant to the Local Economic Development Act of 1988, as amended, Chapter 29, Title 50, Idaho Code (the "Act"), that will cause property taxes resulting from any increases in equalized assessed valuation in excess of the equalized assessed valuation as shown on the base assessment roll as of January 1, 2002, to be allocated to the MDC for urban renewal purposes. The general scope and objectives of the Plan are: The elimination of environmental deficiencies in the Project Area, including, among others, obsolete and aged building types, substandard streets or rights-of- way, enhanced development of existing surface parking lots, inadequate and deteriorated public facilities and improvements. The assembly of land into parcels suitable for efficient, integrated development with improved urban development standards, including setbacks, parking, pedestrian, and vehicular circulation in the Project Area. The funding of arts programs. The replanning, redesign, and development of undeveloped areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized. The strengthening of the economic base of the Project Area and the community by the installation of needed site improvements to stimulate new commercial expansion, employment, and economic growth. The provision of adequate land for parks, open spaces, pedestrian walkways and parking facilities. Improvements to, or construction of, new streets, rights-of--way, and other public infrastructure. The establishment and implementation of performance criteria to assure high site design standards and environmental quality and other design elements which provide unity and integrity to the entire Project. The opportunity of providing housing within the Project Area. The strengthening of the tax base by encouraging private development, thus increasing the assessed valuation of properties within the Revenue Allocation Area and the Project Area as a whole, and benefitting the various taxing districts in which the Urban Renewal Area is located. Any such land uses as described in the Plan will be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian. Land made available will be developed by private enterprises or public agencies as authorized by law. The Plan defines various public and private improvements which may be made within the Meridian Revitalization area. -- 1 -- (Meridian\Hearing Notice/Plan/City Council) The Plan Area and Project Area herein referred to are located as follows: An area consisting of 660 acres with boundaries of the I-84 freeway on the south, Cherry Lane/Fairview on the north, 4th Street on the west, and Five Mile Creek on the east. The Revenue Allocation Area will consist of all of the Project Area (see map below). INSERT MAP] Copies of the proposed Plan are on file for review and public inspection at offices of the City Clerk, City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. At the time and place noted above, all persons interested in the above matter may appear and be heard. Written comments will also be accepted until Noon, October 8, 2002. Comments should be directed to the City Clerk. Individuals who will require special assistance to accommodate physical, vision, hearing, or other impairment, please contact the City at (208) 888-4433, three (3) days prior to the public hearing so that arrangements can be made. DATED This day of 2002. BY: City Clerk Publish: September 2, and 16, 2002. -- 2 -- (Meridian\Heanng Notice/Plan/City Council) [DATE] LETTER TO TAXING ENTITIES Enclosed is a copy of a formal notice that has been published in the Valley Times on September 2 and 16, 2002, advising that the Meridian City Council will hold a public hearing in the City Council Chambers, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, 83642, on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the Meridian Revitalization Plan ("the Plan"), of the Meridian Development Corporation. At that time the City Council will consider an ordinance adopting the Plan. This letter also serves as notice to you, in compliance with Idaho Code Section 50-2906, that the Plan contains a revenue allocation provision and the Meridian Development Corporation ("MDC") rec ommends approval of the Plan. A copy of the Plan and Resolution adopted by the MDC are enclosed. As required by Idaho Code Section 50-2905, the Plan contains a statement listing (1) the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works improvements within the revenue allocation area; (2) an economic feasibility study; (3) a detailed list of estimated project costs; (4) a fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property on the revenue allocation area; and (5) a description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred. You are encouraged to provide your comments, either in writing or at the public hearing. The City Council will hold a work session on the proposed Meridian Revitalization Plan on September 17, 2002, at 6:00 p.m. at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. You are welcome to attend. In the event you would like to schedule a separate meeting to discuss the Plan, representatives of the City and/or the MDC will make themselves available to explain the Plan. Sincerely, Mayor Robert Corrie Will Berg, City Clerk Enclosures Ada County Board of County Commissioners 2. Ada County Highway District (separate letter) 3. Emergency Medical Services 4. Joint School Area No 5. Meridian Cemetery 6. Mayor for City of Meridian 7. Meridian Library 8. Mosquito Abatement 9. Western Ada Recreation ELAM & BURKE A Professiorinl Associnrion ATTORNEYS AT LAW Established iri 1928 251 EAST FRONT STREET TELEPHONE SUITE 300 208-343-5454 POST OFFICE BOX 1539 BOISE, IDAH083701 FACSIMILE RYAN P. ARMBRUSTER 208-384-5844 E-MAIL rpa@elamburke.com August 28, 2002 Mr. Steve Siddoway Ms. Sharon Smith City Planner City Clerk's Office MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MERIDIAN CITY HALL 660 East Watertower Lane, Suite 202 33 East Idaho Sheet Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 ia: siddowas@ci.meridian. id. us ia: smiths@ci. meridian. id. us RE: Meridian Development Corporation Taxing Entity Letters and City Council Hearing Notice Dear Steve and Sharon: I have attached the revised form letters for the taxing entities and the ACHD. Steve, I have also attached the form letter sent over previously to the City Clerk from Jim Johnson. This morning Ryan only received the signed one from Jim Johnson to Mayor Corrie. Did the one to the City Clerk get finalized, signed and forwarded? Could you please let me know? I have also attached the proposed hearing notice of the City Council on the Plan. Ryan would like to take one final look at this before it goes to the paper. He is out of the office this afternoon but will do that first filing in the morning and I will advise Sharon of any changes at that time. Does this work for you, Sharon? Very truly yours, ELAM & BURKE A Professional Association Judy Marlow, Certified PLS Secretary to Ryan P. Armbruster :~ m Attachments E-Mail Delivery (Date Mr. Will Berg City Clerk CITY OF MERIDIAN Meridian City Hall 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Meridian Revitalization Plan Dear Mr. Berg: In compliance with the Idaho Urban Renewal Law of 1965, as amended, (the "Law") and the Local Economic Development Act, Chapter 29, Title 50, Idaho Code (the "Act"), I am providing you the proposed Meridian Revitalization Plan ("Plan"), adopted by the Meridian Development Corporation of Meridian, Idaho on August 21, 2002, pursuant to Agency Resolution No. MDC 02-0006, a copy of which is also enclosed. Under the provisions of the Law and the Act, a public hearing must be held by the City Council prior to final reading of the ordinance adopting the Plan. I have requested that the Mayor schedule the readings and the public hearing in compliance with the city's normal approval process. The Act requires at least 30 days notice, but no more than 60 days notice, of the public hearing. I understand a notice of the hearing date will be published in the Valley Times on within that time frame. Copies of the notice, along with copies of the proposed Plan and the Agency Resolution, should be transmitted to the governing bodies of each taxing district affected by the revenue allocation financing provisions, i.e., Ada County, Ada County Highway District, Emergency Medical Services. Joint School Area No. 2, Meridian Cemetery, meridian City, meridian Library, Mosquito Abatement, Western Ada Recreation, and Mayor of Meridian representing Meridian. The taxing entities must receive that information no later than at least 30 days prior to the hearing. I have enclosed a proposed letter to the taxing entities, with a slightly different letter which goes to the Ada County Highway District once a date has been established. A form notice is enclosed for your consideration. The Plan must also be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission within this time frame. The Commission will need to make a finding concerning compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. I understand Planning and Zoning will consider the Plan on August 29th. me. Thank you for yoLU- cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Very truly yours, MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Chairman, Jim Johnson cc: Mayor Robert Corrie Ryan P. Armbruster, Esquire ~Meriidan/City-Clerk LtrPlan) [DATE] ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 318 East 37th Street Boise, Idaho 83714 RE: Meridian Revitalization Plan Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of a formal notice that will be published in l ~cr/1~~ Tirrres uu September Z and I G, 200?, advising that the Meridian City Council will hold a public hearing in the City Council Chambers, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the Meridian Revitalization Plan ("Plan") of the Meridian Development Corporation. At that time the City Council will consider an ordinance adopting the Plan. This letter also serves as notice to you, incompliance with Idaho Code Section 50-2906, that the Plan contains a revenue allocation provision and the Meridian Redevelopment Corporation recommends approval of the Plan. This letter also serves as formal submission of the Plan for your review and comment under Idaho Code Section 40-1415(3). Please provide your written comments within thirty (30) days. A copy of the Plan is enclosed. The Meridian Development Corporation Board recommended approval of the Plan by adopting its Resolution No. MDC 02-0006 on August 21, 2002. A copy of Resolution No. MDC 02- 0006 is also enclosed. As required by Idaho Code Section 50-2905, the Plan contains a statement listing (1) the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works improvements within the revenue allocation area; (2) an economic feasibility study; (3) a detailed list of estimated project costs; (4) a fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property on the revenue allocation area; and (5) a description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred. You are also encouraged to attend the public hearing. The Meridian City Council will hold a work session on the proposed Meridian Revitalization Plan on September 17, 2002, at 6:00 p.m. at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. You are welcome to attend. In the event you would like to schedule a separate meeting to discuss the Plan, representatives of the City and/or the Meridian Development Corporation will make themselves available to explain the Plan. Sincerely, Mayor Robert Corrie Will Berg, City Clerk Enclosures ~DATE~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 318 East 37th Street Boise, Idaho 83714 RE: Meridian Revitalization Plan Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of a formal notice that will be published in Valley Times on September 2 and 16, 2002, advising that the Meridian City Council will hold a public hearing in the City Council Chambers, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the Meridian Revitalization Plan ("Plan") of the Meridian Development Corporation. At that time the City Council will consider an ordinance adopting the Plan. This letter also serves as notice to you, in compliance with Idaho Code Section 50-2906, that the Plan contains a revenue allocation provision and the Meridian Development Corporation recommends approval of the Plan. This letter also serves as formal submission of the Plan for your review and comment under Idaho Code Section 40-1415(3). Please provide your written comments within thirty (30) days. A copy of the Plan is enclosed. The Meridian Development Corporation Board recommended approval of the Plan by adopting its Resolution No. MDC 02-0006 on August 21, 2002. A copy of Resolution No. MDC 02- 0006 is also enclosed. As required by Idaho Code Section 50-2905, the Plan contains a statement listing (1) the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works improvements within the revenue allocation area; (2) an economic feasibility study; (3) a detailed list of estimated project costs; (4) a fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property on the revenue allocation area; and (5) a description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred. You are also encouraged to attend the public hearing. The Meridian City Council will hold a work session on the proposed Meridian Revitalization Plan on September 17, 2002, at 6:00 p.m. at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. You are welcome to attend. In the event you would like to schedule a separate meeting to discuss the Plan, representatives of the City and/or the Meridian Development Corporation will make themselves available to explain the Plan. Sincerely, Mayor Robert Corrie Will Berg, City Clerk Enclosures August 16, 2002 RZ 00-010 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUgUSt 20, 2002 APPLICANT BRS Architects ITEM NO. ,~~ - J REQUEST Development Agreement: Request to rezone 8.88 acres from an R-4 zone to an L-O zone for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center -- southeast corner of West Cherry Lane and North Ten Mile Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Contacted: See attached Development Agreement ~~ ~~; Phone: Date: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~~~~. ~. GIVE ~~ SLEY LLP LAW OFFICES 277 North 6th Street, Suite 200 PO Box 2720, Boise, Idaho 83701 TELEPHONE: 208 388-1200 FACSIMILE: 208 388-1300 WEBSITE: www.givenspursley.com Judson B. Montgomery Direct Dia1208-388-] 202 jbm(c,t~,giyenspursley_. com Tara M. Green City Clerk's Office City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Gary G. Allen Franklin G. Lee Judson B. Montgomery Christopher J. Beeson David R. Lombardi Angela K. Nelson Michael C. Creamer D. David Lorello, Jr. Deborah E. Nelson Jeffrey A. De Vce Kevin T. Maloney W. Hugh O'Riordan Emily MacMaster Durkee Kimberly D. Maloney Kenneth L. Pursley Thomas E. Dvorak John M. Marshall Brad V. Sneed Roy Lewis Eiguren Kenneth R. McClure Conley E. Ward Timothy P. Fearnside Kelly Greene McConnell Robert B. White Jeffrey C. Fereday Cynthia A. Melillo Steven J. Rippler Christopher H. Meyer Raymond D. Givens Karl T. Klein Kendall L. Miller James A. McClure Debora K. Kristensen L. Edward Miller Stephanie C. Westermeier Anne C. Kunkel Patrick J. Miller oFCOUNSe~ August 6, 2002 ~~~:~~v ~~ 0 B 2002 CITY OF fVIERIDIAIV :I'rY G~.ERK OFFIr^F Re: Development Agreement -Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Our File: 337-1392 Dear Ms. Green: We recently noted that the Development Agreement had not been returned to your office for signature by the City. Accordingly, enclosed please find the execution original of the Development Agreement between Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center and the City of Meridian. We have taken the liberty of changing the date of execution to the current timeframe as compared to last year. Once the City of Meridian approves and executes the Development Agreement, we would appreciate a copy for our files. We apologize for any inconvenience the delay may have caused. If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ~.~ JBM: caw/jao Enclosure cc: Lauren Maiers (w/o enc.) S:\CLIENTS\337\1392\L.ETTER TO T GREEN 8-06-OZ - JBM.DOC Judson B. Montgomery Ordinance Distribution Check Off Sheet for Ordinance No. _ ~i;~ -~r ~ ~' Project File:.~-~. {t~,~i~~:rr~. L~~ ;~ - _c'l:, -~;~() Once recorded all ordinances are distributed to: Applicant -- t,%<-" ~-~''- ~~ City Engineer ~ City Planner City Attorney City Treasurer State Tax Commission County Auditor County Treasurer County Assessor Robert Campbell at COMPASS ~] Sterling Codifiers Clerks Office: Copy to Project File Scan into Laserfiche ,~ Copy to Ordinance Book ^ Original to Minute Book Total: 13 copies for Distribution MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy deWeerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird -~ {,. -~ ,~ ; .~~ ^ ~,'9 Y cirv of 1~t~7~#f~~'. _'-~= .. ,. ~\ erl~lcn~ _ -~ , IDAHO / iF ~~ CFtire / R•[u T V~~~ LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208)288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PARKS & RECREATION (208 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208)898-5500•Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 F.G .~ ,SINCE PLANNING AND ZONING 119U3 (208) 88-t-533 • Fax 888-G8~d September 9, 2002 Re: St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center RZ 0~0-010 Ordinance No. 02-970 Dear Applicant or Agency, Enclosed you will find a copy of the recorded ordinance as noted above. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~~~r~~~ Sharon Smith Deputy City Clerk inc. 33 EAST IDAHO • MERIDIAN, IDA~IO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-42:'.8 Human Resources Fax (208) 2$8-I l93 .-. ,..~ RECORIIEO - REGU~ J 'J FEE DE°UTY6.~~~ ~ ~-._-- ~" f S aoo Z ?~~?AUz9 ~~~t3 102098130 MERIDIAN CITY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center THIS DEVELOPIvIENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), is made and entered into this 25th day of July , 2002, l;v and between CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called "CITY", and SAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, an Idaho nonprofit corporation, hereinafter called "OWNER/DEVELOPER", whose address is 1055 North Curtis Road, Boise, Idaho 83706. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, "Owner/Developer" is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in E.~chibit A, which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the "Property"; and 1.2 WHEREAS, I.C. §67-651 lA, Idaho Code, provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of re-zoning that the owner or "O~vner/Developer" make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject "Property"; and 1.3 WHEREAS, "City" has exercised its statutory authority by ~ J J the enactment of Ordinance 11-15-12 and 11-16-4 A, which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, "Owner/Developer" has submitted an application for annexation and zoning of the "Property"s described in E,~chibit A, and has requested a designation of Limited Office District (L-O), (IVleridian City Code §§ 11- 7-2 G); and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) 1.5 WHEREAS, "Owner/Developer" made representations at the public hearings both before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission and before the ivieridian City Council, as to how the subject "Property" will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, record of the proceedings for the requested re-zoning designation of the subject "Property" held before the Planning ~ Zoning Commission, and subsequently before the City Council, include responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and received further testimony and comment; and 20~~ 1.7 WHEREAS, City Council, the 6th day of March , ~e'~', has approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order, set forth in Exhibit B, which are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set Forth in full, hereinafter referred to as (the "Findings"); and 1.8 WHEREAS, both the "Findings" require the "Owner/Developer" to enter into a development agreement before the City Council takes final action on re-zoning designation; and 1.9 "DEVELOPER" deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and requests; and 1.10 WHEREAS, "City" requires the "Owner/Developer" to ` enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the "Property" is developed and the subsequent use of the "Property".is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this development agreement, herein being established as a result of evidence received by the "City" in the proceedings for re-zoning designation DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) _ Z from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure re-zoning designation is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance #629, January 4, 1994, and the Zoning and Development Ordinances codified in Meridian City Code Title 11 and Title 12. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear conte.Yt of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 "CITY": means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 "DEVELOPER"/"OWNER": means and refers to SAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, an Idaho nonprofit corporation, whose address is 1055 North Curtis Road, Boise, Idaho 83706, the party developing and owning said "Property" and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the "Property". 3.3 "PROPERTY": means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of "Property" located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) _ 3 -1. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under "City"'s Zoning Ordinance codified at Meridian City Code Sections 11-7-2 G which are herein specified as follows: (L-O) Limited Office District: The purpose of the L-O District is to permit the establishment of groupings of professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic, public service and similar uses. Research uses shall not involve heavy testing operations of any kind or product manufacturing of such a nature to create noise, vibration or emissions of a nature offensive to the overall purpose of this District. The L-O District is designed to act as a buffer between other more intense nonresidential uses and high density residential uses, and is thus a transitional use. Connection to the Municipal water and sewer system of the City is a requirement in this District. With the further restriction that all uses and development of the subject real property shall be governed under the conditional use permit process as a planned development. For the construction and development of an ambulatory care center. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. DEVELOPMENT IN CONDITIONAL USE: ` "Developer"/"Owner" have submitted to "City" an application for conditional use permit, and shall be required to obtain the "City"'s approval thereof, in accordance to the City's Zoning SL Development Ordinance criteria, therein, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) _ ~} .''~ provided, prior to, and as a condition of, the commencement of construction of any buildings or improvements on the "Property" that require a conditional use permit. 6. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 6.A "Developer"/"Owner" shall enter into a Development Agreement, that provides in the event the conditions therein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be subject to de-annexation and rezoning, with the City of Meridian which provides for the following conditions of development to-wit: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 6.1 The following conditions pertain to the proposed bank site: a. The bank parcel, as configured, has been shown for conceptual approval within the context of the proposed rezone. If there are significant modifications, as determined by staff, at the time a specific bank and site configuration are determined, such modifications shall require application for a modification of the current CUP/PUD application. As a modification, the bank parcel shall be reviewed on its own merit and either approved or denied without jeopardizing or compromising the approval of the current CUP/PUD application for Saint Alphonsus Medical Office Building. Significant modifications shall include, but not be limited to, ` e.~cpansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. Additionally, in the event a bank project does not materialize, then applicant shall be allowed to DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) _ 5 ~ ~ develop any other principally allowed L-O use on that parcel, subject to staff's review and approval. If the nature of such a development were determined by staff to exceed the conceptual intent of the current CUP/PUD, then that change would also be require a modification as noted above. To clarify, any such modification shall be reviewed on its own merit. To clarify, the bank parcel is conceptual at this point. Any future development or action on this parcel is intended to be independent of the current application and approvals, specifically the ambulatory care/medical office building portion. The bank parcel, in no way, shall jeopardize the ability to proceed with the balance of the development. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. The material color palette presented are conceptual at this time. Applicant has freedom to modify colors in the future, subject to staffs review. c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. Applicant has updated the Master Site Development Plan providing an access point through the landscape berm along the east property line of the bank parcel to allow more direct access ` from these (9) parking stalls to the bank. 6.2 Any e:dsting domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) _ 6 ~'~. ~'1 may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 6.3 Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance 11-13 for use of undeveloped lots. 6.4 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 6.5 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 6.6 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, Elags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 6.7 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.I~. 6.8 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 6.9 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south ` of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the. southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) _ ~ Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 6.10 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right-in/right-out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to accommodate the on-site median. 6.11 Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any e.~cisting or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verily that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The eastern most driveway on Cherry Lane shall be shifted approximately 60 feet to the east to accommodate this policy. The revised Master Site Development Plan reflects this change. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. 6.12 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide drivetivay on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of ` Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. 6.13 Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15- foot curb radii. DEVELOP.Tv1ENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) _ g 6.1 ~ Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match e_~cisting improvements. 6.15 Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match e_~sting improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACHD Construction Services staff. 6.16 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 6.17 Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane is prohibited. Adopt the additional action of the Council Erom their February 20, 2001, meeting by incorporating the Applicant's letter of 02/12/01 as follows: 6.18 Pertaining to the site lighting, the applicant shall comply with the ordinance requirements, and specifically, the site lighting shall be designed so that light does not directly reflect or spill over into adjacent residential districts, that the site lighting arrangement shall be approved by the City Engineer and that applicant comply with the listed site lighting standards. A Conceptual Site Lighting Plan has been submitted to show the proposed site lighting arrangement, light levels and fixture types, and is on file with the City Clerk's office. ` 6.19 The "Hours of Business Operation" shall be defined as "Hours during which the facility is actually open for business and patients are on the premises being seen or treated." Additionally, to clarify facility maintenance, before or after hours staff preparation or other similar activities occurring when the facility is not open for DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) _ q business are not subject to "Hours of Business Operation" restrictions. 7. COMPLIANCE PERIOD/ CONSENT TO REZONE: This Agreement and the commitments contained herein shall be terminated, and the zoning designation reversed, upon a default of the "Developer"/"Owner" or "Developer"'s/"Owner's" heirs, successors, assigns, to comply with Section 6 entitled "Conditions Governing Development of subject "Property" of this agreement within two years of the date this Agreement is effective, and after the "City" has complied with the notice and hearing procedures as outlined in I.C. § 67-b509, or any subsequent amendments or recodifications thereof. 8. CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION "Developer"/"Owner" consents upon default to the de-annexation and/or a reversal of the zoning designation of the "Property" subject to and conditioned upon the following conditions precedent to-wit: 8.1 That the "City" provide written notice of any failure to comply with this Agreement to "Developer"/"Owner" and if the "Developer"/"Owner" fails to cure such failure within six (6) months of such notice. 9. INSPECTION: "Developer"/"Owner" shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the "Property" as required by this agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement and all other ordinances of the "City" that apply to said Development. 10. DEFAULT: 10.1 In the event "Developer"/"Owner", "Developer"'s/"Owner's" heirs, successors, assigns, or DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) -10 subsequent owners of the "Property" or any other person acquiring an interest in the "Propeny", fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the "Property", this Agreement may be modified or terminated by the "City" upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 10.2 A waiver by "City" of any default by "Developer"/"Owner" of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the breach and breaches waived and shall not bar any other rights or remedies of "City" or apply to any subsequent breach of any such or other covenants and conditions. 11. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: "City" shall record either a memorandum of this Agreement or this Agreement, including all of the E,~chibits, at "Developer"'s/"Owner's" cost, and submit proof of such recording to "Developer"/"Owner", prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the rezoning of the "Property" by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the rezoning of the "Property" contemplated hereby, the "City" shall e:cecute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 12. ZONING: "City" shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the "Property" as specified herein. 13. REMEDIES: This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction by either "City" or "Developer"/"Owner", or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. ` Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. 13.1 In the event of a material breach of this Agreement, the parties agree that "City" and "Developer"/"Owner" shall DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) - 11 have thirty (30) days after delivery of notice of said breach to correct the same prior to the non-breaching party's seeking of any remedy provided for herein; provided, however, that in the case of any such default which cannot with diligence be cured within such thirty (30) day period, if the defaulting party shall commence to cure the same within such thing (30) day period and thereafter shall prosecute the curing of same with diligence and continuity, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be e.~ctended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 13.2 In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either "Developer"/"Owner" or "City" is delayed for causes which are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be e.~ctended by the amount of time of such delay. 14. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The "City" may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under Meridian City Code §12-5-3, to insure that installation of the improvements, which the "Developer" agrees to provide, if required by the "City". 15. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: The "Developer"/"Owner" agrees that no Certificates of Occupancy will be issued until all improvements are completed, unless the "City" and "Developer"/"Owner" have entered into an addendum agreement stating when the improvements will be completed in a phased developed; and in any event, no Certificates of Occupancy shall be ` issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the "City". 16. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That "Developer"/"Owner" agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian and the "Property" shall be subject to reversal of the zoning if the owner or his DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) - 12 ^~ ~ assigns, heirs, or successors shall not meet the conditions contained in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of La~v, this Development Agreement, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 17. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: c!o City Engineer Citv of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center 1055 North Curtis Road Boise, Idaho 83706 with copy to: City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 17.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 18. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 19. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) -13 anv of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 20. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including "City"'s corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the owner of the "Property", each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the "Propeny". Nothing herein shall in anv ~vay prevent sale or alienation of the "Property", or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benef`itted and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein e.~cpressed. "City" agrees, upon written request of "Developer", to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if "City", in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that "Developer" has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. 21. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between "Owner/Developer" and "City" relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, e.~cpress or implied, between "Owner/Developer" and "City", other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to "City", to ` a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of "City". 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing development of the subject "Property" herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the ""City" has DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) _ 14 conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the date the Meridian Citv Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the "Property" and execution of the ~Iavor and City Clerk. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) -15 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~"~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and Made it effective as hereinabove provided. SAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, an Idaho nonprofit corporation Bv: Sandra Bruce, President and CEO Attest: Secretary BY RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: M or Robert D. Corrie ti. Attest: iZ~-- City Clerk BY RESOLUTION NO. ., ;~'~~```~~y o~~1 ~9'y ~~~~. .~' Fo • T `- SEAL - ~~ o~ ~~ %9o GST tS'~ ~~\~~~~ .^~~ ~. -,, 111 'i ., DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) -16 ~ n .. STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss COUNTY OF ADA ) On this~'~iay of in the year 2 0 0 2 , before me, a Notary Public, in and or said State, personally appeared Sandra Bruce and ,known or identified to me to be the President/CEO and Secretary of Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, an Idaho nonprofit corporation that executed the instrument or the persons who executed the instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. l~ -Ca~~ (SEAL) Not Public for Idaho Residing at: f~c~ ~ju„~..~~ Commission e.~cpires: -c> .. a _ a~3 STATE OF IDAHO :ss County of Ada ) On this 20~ day of _~( , in the year 2 0 0 2 , before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert D. Corrie and William G. Berg, know or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. . ~ ^ . ~ ^ ., 1. ., .. ., •...• DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) G~Q~~ - Notarv Public for Idaho Commission e.~cpires: ~/' Zg D~ -17 EXHIBIT A ~"~ Legal Description Of Property A parcel of land located in Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11 of Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho from which point the North 1/4 corner of said Section 11 bears South 89°03'40" East a distance of 2653.23 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West along the westerly boundary line of said Section 11 a distance of 300.00 feet; thence leaving said Section line South 89°03'40" East a distance of 45.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°03'40" East a distance of 681.14 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West a distance of 274.92 feet; thence South 89°20'00" East a distance of 416.35 feet; thence North 00°00'00" East a distance of 522.38 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way line of Cherry Lane; thence along said southerly right-of-way line, North 89°07'31" West a distance of 1067.02 feet; thence South 44°30'45" West a distance of 43.47 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of Ten Mile Road; thence along said easterly right-of-way line South 00°00'00" West a distance of 216.74 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 386,613 square feet or 8.88 acres more or less. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) -18 EXHIBIT B Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law/Conditions of AF~roval Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\ScAls 12ZOlOCLIP056\DeveloaA fr o~rRZ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RZ-00-010) -19 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN C/C 02-20-01 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR REZONE OF APPROXIMATELY 8.88 ACRES FOR PROPOSED AMBULATORY CARE CENTER, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TEN MILE ROAD AND CHERRY LANE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO Case No: RZ-00-010 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR REZONE ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, APPLICANT The above entitled matter on the rezoning application of 8.88 acres having come on for public hearing on February 20, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m., and Council having received the report of Brad Hawkins-Clark, Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant were Mike Ondracelc, Darrell Fugate, Doug Racine and Wes Smith, and appearing in favor of the application was Dennis Durant, and those appearing in opposition, with comments and/or concerns ~~rere Ihvayne Lingel, Penny Hanson, Brian Lindell, and Robert Morrision, and the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-oI0) -I Council having received the record of this matter made before the Planning and Zoning Commission, and having received their Recommendation to the City Council, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of La~v, Decision and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT The notice of public hearing on the application for rezoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to said public hearing scheduled for February 20, 2001, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the February 20, 2001, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-OIO) -2 .~-. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-651 1, and Meridian Citv Code §§ I I-15-5 and II-16-1. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and development ordinances codified at Meridian City Code Title 1 I and Title 12, and all current zoning maps thereof, and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629 -January 4, 1994, and maps and the ordinance Establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 4. The property is approximately 8.88 acres in size. The property is generally located at the southeast corner of Ten Mile Road and Cherry Lane, Meridian, Idaho, and is described as follows: A parcel of land located in Section 11, Township 3 North, Range West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11 of Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho from which point the North 1/4 corner of said Section 11 bears South 89°03'40" East a distance of 2653.23 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West along the westerly boundary line of said Section 11 a distance of 300.00 feet; thence leaving said Section line South 89°03'40" East a distance of 45.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°03'40" East a distance of 681.14 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West a distance of 274.92 feet; thence South 89°20'00" East a distance of 416.35 feet; thence North 00°00'00" East a distance of 522.38 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way line of Cherry Lane; thence along said southerly right-of--way line, North 89°07'31" West a distance of 1067.02 feet; thence South 44°30'45" West a distance of 43.47 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of Ten Mile Road; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OP APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -3 thence along said easterly right-of--way line South 00°00'00" West a distance of 216.74 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 386,613 square feet or 8.88 acres more or less. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise, Idaho. 6. The Applicant is owner of record. 7. The property is presently zoned as R-4, and is fallow agricultural. 8. The Applicant requests the property be rezoned to L-O. 9. The proposed site is surrounded by a church and residential subdivision to the north, a church and residential subdivision to the south, a residential subdivision to the east and retail uses to the west. I0. The subject property is within city limits of the City of Meridian. 1 I . The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning .Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 12. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: construction of an ambulatory care center. I3. The Applicant's requested rezoning of the subject real property as L-O is consistent with the commercial designation on the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Existing Urban. 14. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) _ 4 .'~, .~ that affect the consideration of this application. I5. In review of the application for rezone it is provided at Meridian City Code § 11-15-1 lfor the General Standards that the Commission and Council review this proposed zoning amendment and pursuant to the criteria of said section finds that: 15. I The netiv zoning will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan; 15.2 The area included in the zoning amendment is not intended to be rezoned in the future; 15.3 The proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area, subject to the conditions of the conditional use process; 15.4 The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses, subject to the conditions of the conditional use process; 15.5 The area will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; 15.6 The use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; 15.7 The use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L•O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-020) -5 excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; 15.8 The area will have vehicular approaches to the property ~vhich shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; 15.9 The use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and 15.10 The proposed zoning will be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15.2 Staff conditions provide as follows: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 15.2.1 The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 15.2.2 The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: a. The bank parcel, as configured, has been shown for conceptual approval within the context of the proposed rezone. If there are significant modifications, as determined by staff, at the time a specific bank and site configuration are determined, such modifications shall require application for a modification of the current CUP/PUD application. As a modification, the bank parcel shall be reviewed on its own merit and eithex approved or denied without jeopardizing or compromising the approval of the current CUP/PUD application for Saint Alphonsus , Medical Office Building. Significant modifications shall include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) -6 ~'~. ,rte Additionally, in the event a bank project does not materialize, then applicant shall be allowed to develop any other principally allowed L-O use on that parcel, subject to staffs review and approval. If the nature of such a development were determined by staff to exceed the conceptual intent of the current CUP/PUD, then that change would also be require a modification as noted above. To clarify, any such modifiication shall be reviewed on its own merit. To clarify, the bank parcel is conceptual at this point. Any future development or action on this parcel is intended to be independent of the current application and approvals, specifically the ambulatory careimedical office building portion. The bank parcel, in no way, shall jeopardize the ability to proceed with the balance of the development. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. The material color palette presented are conceptual at this time. Applicant has freedom to modify colors in the future, subject to staffs xeview. c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. Applicant has updated the Master Site Development Plan providing an access point through the landscape berm along the east property line of the bank parcel to allow more direct access from these (9) parking stalls to the bank. I5.2.3Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic sexvice per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 15.2.40ff street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance 11-13 for use of undeveloped lots. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -7 i"~. /1 15.2.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections I1-13-4.C. and I2-5-2.M. 15.2.6A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 15.2.7A11 signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section I 1-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or Flashing signs will be permitted. 15.2.8 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section I Z-5-2.IC 15.2.9All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 15.2. l OConstruct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten 1~1i1e Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct a six-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop baz at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 15.2.11 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/riglit-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the drivetivay to right-in/right-out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) -8 for right tum movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to accommodate the on- site median. 15.2.12Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The eastern most driveway on Cherry Lane shall be shifted approximately 60 feet to the east to accommodate this policy. The revised Master Site Development Plan reflects this change. An island is required within the drivewav and should be constructed a minimum of 4- feet wide and located outside of the public right-of-~vay. I5.2.13Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets .District policy. I5.2.14Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. 15.2.15Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 15.2.16Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACHD Construction Services staff. 15.2.17Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years ald are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 15.2.180ther than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -9 ~ ~ Cherry Lane is prohibited. Adopt the additional action of the Council from their February 20, 2001, meeting by incorporating the Applicant's letter of 02/12/OI as follows: I5.2.19Pertaining to the site lighting, the applicant shall comply with the ordinance requirements, and speafically, the site lighting shall be designed so that light does not duectly reflect or spill over into adjacent residential districts, that the site lighting arrangement shall be approved by the City Engineer and that applicant comply with the listed site lighting standards. A Conceptual Site Lighting Plan has been submitted to show the proposed site lighting arrangement, light levels and fixture types, and is on file with the City Clerk's office. 15.2.20The "Hours of Business Operation" shall be defined as "Hours during which the facility is actually open for business and patients are on the premises being seen or treated." Additionally, to clarify facility maintenance, before or after hours staff preparation or other similar activities occurring when the facility is not open for business are not subject to "Hours of Business Operation" restrictions. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Council may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 2. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975", codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by the adoption of Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. No. 629, January 4, 1994.. 3. The requested zoning of Limited Office District, (L-O) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at I 1-7-2 G as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) - la ~-. L-O Limited ce District: The purpose of the L-O District is to permit the establishment of groupings of professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic, public service and similar uses. Research uses shall not involve heavy testing operations of any kind or product manufacturing of such a nature to create noise, vibration or emissions of a nature offensive to the overall purpose of this District. The L-O District is designed to act as a buffer between other more intense nonresidential uses and high density residential uses, and is thus a transitional use. Connection to the Municipal water and sewer system of the City is a requirement in this District. 4. Idaho Code § 67-651 I provides and requires that the City shall establish by ordinance one or more zones or zoning districts in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the ordinance establishing zoning districts can be amended with particular consideration given to the effects of any proposed zone change upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services, including school districts, within the City's planning jurisdiction and that it is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. Idaho Code § 67-651 IA provides: Each governing board may, by ordinance adopted or amended in accordance with the notice and hearing provisions provided under section 67-6509, Idaho Code, require or permit as a condition of rezoning that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject parcel. The governing board shall adopt ordinance provisions governing the creation, form, recording, modification, enforcement and termination of conditional commitments. 6. The City of Meridian by the adoption of Meridian City Code § 11-15- 12 has exercised its authority to require or permit as a condition of rezoning FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-OIO) -11 that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject property. 7. § 11-6-1 ZONING DISTRICT MAP provides in part as follows: The districts established in this Ordinance as shown on the Official Zoning Map, together with all explanatory matter thereon, are hereby adopted as part of this Ordinance. Where uncertainty exists with respect to the boundaries of any of the zoning districts as shown on the Official Zoning Map, the following shall apply: 7.1 Where district boundaries are indicated as approximately following the centerline of street lines, highway right-of- way lines, streams, lakes or other bodies of water, the centerline shall be construed to be such boundary; 7.2 Where district boundaries are so indicated that they approximately follow the lot lines, such lot lines shall be construed to be said boundaries; 7.3 ~N'hzre district boundaries are so indicated that trey are approximately parallel to the centerlines or street lines of streets, or the centerlines or right-of-way lines of highways, such district boundaries shall be construed as being parallel thereto and at such distance therefrom as indicated on the Offaal Zoning Map. If no distance is given, such dimensions shall be determined by the use of the scale shown on the Official Zoning Map; and 7.4 Where the boundary of a district follows a railroad line, such boundary shall be deemed to be located in the middle of the main tracks of said railroad line. 8. § 11- 15-1 I of the Meridian City Code GENERAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ZONING AMENDMENTS provides in part as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -12 ,.~. The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment: 8.1 The new zoning will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 8.2 The area is not intended to be rezoned in the future. 8.3 The area is intended to be developed in the fashion that is allowed under the new zoning. 8.4 There has been no change in the area or adjacent areas which would dictate the area should be rezoned. 8.5 The proposed uses will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vianity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; 8.6 The proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; 8.7 The azea will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; 8.8 The use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; 8.9 The proposed uses will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION t#lYD ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -13 or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; 8.10 The area will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; 8. I 1 The use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and 8.12 The proposed zoning amendment is in the best interest of the City of ivleridian. DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WHICH ARE HEREIN ADOPTED, the City Council does hereby Order and this does Order: The Applicant's request for rezone of approximately 8.88 acres for construction and development of an ambulatory care center is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of this Order hereinafter stated; and 2. The following special terms and conditions of use and development relate to this application to-wit: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 2.1 The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 2.2 The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) • 14 conceptual at this time. Applicant has freedom to modify colors in the future, subject to staffs review. .fl , ~la r a. The bank parcel, as configured, has been shown for conceptual approval within the context of the proposed rezone. if there are significant modifications, as determined by staff, at the time a specific bank and site configuration are determined, such modifications shall require application for a modification of the current CUPlPUD application. As a modification, the bank parcel shall be reviewed on its own merit and either approved or denied without jeopardizing or compromising the approval of the current CUP/PUD application for Saint Alphonsus Medical Office Building. Significant modifications shall include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. Additionally, in the event a bank project does not materialize, then applicant shall be allowed to develop any other principally allowed L-O use on that parcel, subject to staffs review and approval. Tf the nature of such a development were determined by staff to exceed the conceptual intent of the current CUP/PUD, then that change would also be require a modification as noted above. To clarify, any such modification shall be reviewed on its own merit. To clarify, the bank parcel is conceptual at this point. Any future development or action on this parcel is intended to be independent of the current application and approvals, specifically the ambulatory care/medical office building portion. The bank parcel, in no way, shall jeopardize the ability to proceed with the balance of the development. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. The material color palette presented are FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF 2.9 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 2.10 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten IVlile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of dniveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 2.11 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right-in/right-out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to accommodate the on-site median. 2.12 Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet fxom any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The eastern most driveway on Cherry Lane shall be shifted approximately 60 feet to the east to accommodate this policy. The revised Master Site Development Plan reflects this change. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-OIO) -I7 wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. 2.13 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 1 SO-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. 2.14 Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15- foot curb radii. 2.15 Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 2.16 Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACHD Construction Services staff. 2.17 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 2.18 Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane is prohibited. Adopt the additional action of the Council from their February 20, 2001, meeting by incorporating the Applicant's letter of 02/12/01 as follows: 2.I9 Pertaining to the site lighting, the applicant shall comply with the ordinance requirements, and specifically, the site lighting shall be designed so that light does not directly reflect or spill over into adjacent residential districts, that the site lighting arrangement shall be approved by the City Engineer and that applicant comply with the listed site lighting standards. A Conceptual Site Lighting Plan has FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) 18 ~ ~ been submitted to show the proposed site lighting arrangement, light levels and fixture types, and is on file tivith the City Clerk's office. 2.20 The "Hours of Business Operation" shall be defined as "Hours during which the facility is actually open for business and patients are on the premises being seen or treated." Additionally, to clarify facility maintenance, before or after hours staff preparation or other similar activities occurring when the facility is not open for business are not subject to "Hours of Business Operation" restrictions. 3. The City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate ordinance for the re-designation of the zoning for the real property which is the subject of the application to (L-O) Limited Office District (Meridian City Code § I I -7-2 G) which ordinance shall be considered for passage. 4. Subsequent to the passage of the Ordinance, provided for in Section 3 of this Order, the engineering staff of the Public Works Department shall prepare the appropriate mapping changes of the offiaal Zoning Maps as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-21-1 in accordance with the provisions of the rezoning ordinance. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the rezoning may, within twenty-eight (28) days after the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -19 date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. 6~ By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of /" ~ L~ ~'~- , 2001. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD VOTED-~Z~`- COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED_~~~A"" COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED_Z~~''r" MAYOR ROBERT CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED ~^ DATED: ~ -' 6 ~ D( MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and the City Attorney. ~ ~~~~ By' ~ Dated: City Clerlc msg~Z:lWorlc~NllMeridian~Meridian 15360M1,StAls R7AIOCUP056~FfsClsOrderREZ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER r' (RZ-00-010) *~3~.~ ~F ~r~/i ~~~~~~ ~~A.L r~ ,p s - 20 ,~•, r Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 24 Hatcher: The sidewalk and addition of the notes to the Preliminary Plat. Nary: As well yes also the note -that there would be a note on the plat that all the property on this would - on this Preliminary Plat would be required to have a CUP for their use and that there would -- apparently they want the sidewalk to be an attached sidewalk along Hickory Lane. Is that correct? Hatcher: That's correct. Borup: Yes. Nary: With those two comments as well yes. Borup: Second concur with that? Hatcher: Second. Borup: Motion is second. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Item 6. Public Hearing: RZ 00-010 Request for rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center by BRS Architects -southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road: Item 7. Public Hearing: CUP 00-056 Request for Conditional Use Permit for St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center to construct a Planned Development for an ambulatory, out-patient care center with adjacent bank development by BRS Architects -southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road: Borup: Next item is Items No. 6 and 7 public hearing request for a rezone for 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Ambulatory Care Center. Then related to that is request for Conditional Use Permit for the same project by BRS Architects. I would like to go ahead open both public hearings at this time, Brad your staff report. Hawkins-Clark: Thank you Chairman Borup. The property again is here at - there is actually separate parcels existing. The project would encompass both. Cherry Lane along the north, which in this location is already constructed that it is full right-of-way width with curb, gutter, sidewalk, five-lanes. They were not required to provide any additional right-of-way the same situation on Ten Mile Road. The Albertson's store is directly west. There is a church to the north. The Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 25 subdivision -there is two churches actually to the south here. Haven Cove Subdivision is here on the east and south. Site photos currently fallow agricultural ground. There is this existing hedge here separating the subject site from the church. This is looking from Cherry Lane looking south Haven Cove's homes there. Looking west from the middle of the site there is currently a chain link fence that comes from Ten Mile heading east. Some ball fields for the LDS Church on the south side. Here is the proposed site plan and I would just ask that our conditions in the staff report dated January 16, 2001 be included. There are - I have had some discussions with Mr. Doug Racine of BRS there seems to be -large agreement I would just point out two items for you. The applicant would like to clarify on Number 6 on page 4 that they are not intending 3 separate legal parcels. They are just intending to move the existing parcel line, which is more or less I think about here. Shifting that here. The site plan refers to what could be deemed as three parcels but they just want to clarify they're not looking at three its just two. We did discuss -here on the entry off of Ten Mile Road they have aright-in right-out driveway here on the southern boundary. They are proposing 15 parking stalls which would have head-in parking here. We had a concern, which is number - I forget what number it was. Seven on the CUP. That these stalls in terms of backing up while you have both incoming and outgoing traffic may have some problems with vision and speed increasing here. We talked about increasing the stacking distance from the entrance I believe it would be like 50 to 60 feet increasing it to a 100 so they would lose some stalls. What it would do is basically give a little more stacking distance should somebody be backing out. I'm not sure we have complete agreement. I think there are still some safety concerns of having parking down there at all myself. They do -they are looking for getting some additional parking on the site and that seems to be the one place that can be achieved. They are proposing some fencing and I think Doug can speak to that. There is existing fencing here along the eastern boundary with Haven Cove that's in pretty decent shape. These five or six homes here do not all have fences and they're proposing to just go ahead and construct a fence the full distance. I think that's all I need to pint at this point. There are some proposed elevations here on the screen of the facility. The bank is not here they are proposing that would come in with elevations at the time of the building permit. If you do approve the concept of the bank with the two drive- thru aisles and we would support approving it as shown but if they want increase the number of drive-thru aisles to three or more they would have to come back. Or if they want to want to change the orientation or some other things that I listed there then they would need to come back on the bank. Otherwise I think we're comfortable with that being approved at this time without the elevations. Thanks. Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the Commission? Centers: Brad regarding the parking, the head-in parking. I have experienced that in fact was in a minor collision in a parking lot. Would speed bumps help? Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 26 Hawkins-Clark: I think some kind of traffic calming could certainly -yes probably on both ends as you have the service drive sort of angles down chokes down right here. That certainly would provide some traffic calming. I don't know how much traffic you are going to see. There certainly is a lot of I'm assuming potential employee parking down here. A lot of patient parking on the north part of the complex. Being the only entrance and exit onto Ten Mile right here. Yes, I think - as people come in the one argument you add a 100 -feet people can actually increase their speed in that amount of distance. They may not see somebody backing out. A speed bump fairly close to the entrance would give cause for hesitation and slowing. Hatcher: Brad in your earlier discussions with the applicant did you discuss reconfiguring that space. I could see some potential of putting the drive aisle up against the LDS property line and taking those 15 stalls and incorporating them somewhere in and around the bank circulation. You might be able not be able to get 15 but you might be able to re-coop some of them while maintaining a straight drive aisle to eliminate any potential. It is literally a drive aisle. We've got to consider it as that. I think it would be better to be preventative than to try to fix a problem we know exists. Hawkins-Clark: Yes Commissioner Hatcher we did not discuss that per say, no. Hatcher: Okay. Borup: Anyone else? Nary: Mr. Chairman. Borup: Commissioner Nary. Nary: At least looking at the staff report Brad the recommendation that is in the report is just simply eliminate those spaces entirely. Isn't that correct. Hawkins-Clark: That is. I don't know that that would -again Commissioner Hatcher comment about potentially getting them in. It is fairly restricted width at that point of the parcel. I don't know how much -given that a stall is 19-feet deep reconfiguration you can do and still accomplish that. Especially with the assumption they are -the Ordinance requires that parking stalls be on the same parcel as what they serve unless there is some kind of cross access agreement or something. They are proposing to separate the bank off into its own parcel right here and here. Essentially you would be putting these parcels - I mean these parking stalls off site for the hospital if you did that. I don't know that is an impossibility. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 27 Borup: You eluded to - I think we will probably ask the applicant this. I wonder if that could have been intended for employee parking for the bank where it wouldn't be in and out through the day. Did they mention that at all? Hawkins-Clark: No. Hatcher: I think it's aquestion - I'd like to address the applicant when he gets up. Even if that's the parcel layout right now just gut instinct is that the stalls for that bank is a little shy. Hawkins-Clark: Actually Commissioner Hatcher they do meet the parking requirement. Hatcher: Do they? Hawkins-Clark: Yes. It's because of the nine stalls that are right here. Hatcher: That are really orientated towards the hospital rather than the bank. Hawkins-Clark: Correct, which is why we suggested putting some kind of pedestrian access right here. Because right now this landscape strip goes right here. It keeps all of these nine stalls from -you get out of your car and don't really have any direct pedestrian access to the bank. I think they are like four or five over from what they are required for the square-footage shown. Centers: Mr. Chairman. Borup: Commissioner Centers. Centers: I read Item Seven on the report. Rather than eliminate them totally how would you feel about parallel parking at least give them five or six. They are trying to make use of the land. As far as parking for the bank, banks are discouraging personal contact now days so I think that's probably adequate. Use the machine not the person. Hawkins-Clark: We could - I think the limit to reduce the reversing in to the drive aisles is our concern. I think if you were parallel parked you would at least have the advantage of a - Centers: That would give -well we can talk to the applicant. Hatcher: Parallel parking on the ingress and egress. Borup: Let's ask the applicant to come forward. I think we've all read the application probably best use of time if you would like to address any of the specific staff comments. •-- r• Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 28 Racine: My name is Doug Racine, BRS Architects, architect for St. AI's Regional Medical Center. We've gone through the staff comments and Brad has reflected them all accurately all the things we've discussed. In particular with regard to the number of drive-thru lanes at the bank. The nature of our proposal on the banks approval is conceptual. We don't have a specific bank tenant at this point. So that parcel is subject to massaging a t his point. What we are looking for conceptual approval in the CUP context of a bank on that corner. With regard to the fencing at the south property line adjacent to those parcels we've agreed to go ahead and install asix-foot wood slat fence comparable to fences in the neighborhood to provide additional screening in addition to the 20-foot buffering. Evergreen trees in that buffer. With regard to the 15 parking stalls I think Brad has a good point I had suggested to Brad in conversation that perhaps we could get 100-feet, which would allow reasonable stacking for possibly for right-in. In other words please be aware that it's not a full access both directions. Its only right in so only northbound traffic off of Ten Mile will be turning in there. We certainly do want to create a traffic hazard. I would propose that we work with staff to come up with a reasonable solution that Brad finds acceptable prior to the City Council hearing. If it's a suggestion for parallel parking that's good if we can integrate it in with the bank parking that's another option. There is the likelihood that there will be some sort of cross access and cross parking agreement executed with the bank just by the nature of the development. His comment on this nine spaces I quite frankly didn't think of that when I was laying that out. I don't think there is any problem with punching through the pedestrian access for those nine spaces. Again I it's intended somewhat to be shared parking likewise if those 15 spaces on that one property line remain or some facsimile of that that could also be construed to be bank parking some cross parking. Centers: Employee's. Racine: Yes, it could be. I don't think it was specifically intended to be that way but via cross parking it can certainly end up being that way. What we're trying to do is provide reasonable parking for -would be the west end the ambulatory care center. We want to provide reasonable parking spaces in that area. We did try to minimize the straight shot access down the service drive. That was kind of the logic for the offset around the trash dumpster, landscaped screened area just so people couldn't have a direct line. The suggestion of speed bumps is reasonable we definitely want to calm traffic as they pass into that lot. The nature of people using this development, ambulatory care would encourage that sort of a device for that end be it a speed bump or signage. Hopefully a speed bump will work for us. I think all in all he clarified the issue of the number of parcels that we're proposing. Again I think we've addressed the screening issue at the south property line and the conceptual nature of our bank approval. Other than that we really don't have any opposition to staff's recommendations and would entertain any questions that you may have at this point. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 29 Borup: Any questions from the Commission? It sounds like really the only item that maybe is not 100 percent resolved at this point is was that on those parking stalls on the - Racine: If we can't - Borup: -- or a drive - or whether it goes 100-feet or what ever is worked out. Racine: If it came to we absolutely had to eliminate it we can. Obviously we want to retain as much as we can. Borup: What do they intend for bank employee parking? Racine: That could be done in those spaces via cross parking agreement. Or in the nine spaces that are on the other side of the landscape buffer, which we would provide access through. Hatcher: Commissioner Borup. Borup: Commissioner Hatcher. Hatcher: I think it would be prudent just to bring up the fact too that we are looking at a Rezone and a CUP. Were not trying to solve an issue that's on a Preliminary Plat or a Final Plat. Borup: That part is true but that access is going to be there before the bank goes in. Is that correct or not? Racine: Its possible -they could go together but - Borup: That's an access point to the hospital. Racine: Correct. Borup: That access will be in when the hospital is built. Racine: Yes that's correct all three of those accesses - Borup: -- without the bank going in. Hatcher: Right but we would be addressing that issue in the Preliminary Plat review. It would give the applicant time to resolve the issue as to how to fix - Borup: You mean Preliminary Plat of which? Hatcher: Preliminary Plat of the project itself. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 30 Borup: Okay I'm sorry. Hatcher: Because the Preliminary Plat - Borup: Right - Hatcher: -- will come back before us. Borup: On that design. Racine: I think we're proposing just to clarify -because we have an existing property line there that we create the bank (inaudible) - Borup: (inaudible) they're not presenting aplat - *** End of Side Two*** Borup: -- bad tape for reason. We're ready to (inaudible) now Centers: Mr. Chairman. Borup: Commissioner Centers. Centers: In the recess I had made a comment do we want to go through that? Borup: Yes probably be good just to summarize it. Centers: I had made a comment and asked the applicant (inaudible) St. Luke's on Eagle Road, they have numerous speed bumps. He said he had and they were really considering that. Related to my previous personal experience in backing out and your response - Racine: My response was yes I think we're going to want to try to calm traffic especially in its relationship to the signalized traffic so that we don't encourage people to try to circumvent the traffic light for our development. I think it's going to be pretty much common sense on our part to install speed bumps or some traffic calming device. Then further I mentioned with regard to those 15 stalls that I hadn't really considered the potential problem when I laid that out with people backing out of those 90-degree stalls and conflicting with incoming traffic. I mentioned to Brad in a phone conversation that we work out some sort of a mutually agreeable solution with staff. Either through quantified analysis by a traffic engineer or just come to some agreement with staff. If it's determined that all 15 stalls do need to go that's in the sake of public safety that's something we'll do. Meridian Planning and Zoning Lommission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 31 Borup: Had you considered moving the road down south -- Racine: I had at one point - Borup: -- and then sifting the whole site and putting the parking like Commissioner Hatcher had mentioned. Racine: I had considered at one point. But what I was trying to do - we are somewhat limited if you move further to the east. On that site when we start looking at the structural modules for the ambulatory care center and the required gateway landscape buffer and the parking stall depths, the drive aisles and adjacent parking to the building that only left one location for the service drive more or less adjacent to the LDS property. Borup: I see you've already got it on the hospital at that location. Racine: Yes I've it (inaudible) there. I specifically tried not to make a straight shot through. I wanted to try to create some sort of again traffic calming so that people couldn't just come in on that service drive and punch it and go down that drive. Hatcher: Chairman Borup. Borup: Commissioner Hatcher. Hatcher: Upon further review after you pointed that out it's a valid concern. It's a valid solution. Racine: So with regard to those 15 spaces we'll work - I propose we work that out with staff even if it means total elimination of it. Then we revise our site plan prior to the City Council hearing submitted and seven days prior to that that would reflect the revision to that parking. The punching through the berm for those nine spaces that could serve as employee parking for the bank. We would add the - a reference to a new six-foot high wooden fence along the south property line adjacent to t hose residential properties. In the interim I'll touch base with the sanitary company and see if we've got reasonable access for that one trash enclosure. That's located near the bank right now there may be a problem getting garbage trucks to nose into that. That might sift to the east slightly. Those are all things I would intend to address prior to Council hearing. Borup: Okay anything else? Thank you Mr. Racine. Racine: Thank you. Centers: Thank you. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 32 Borup: Do we have anyone here that would like to testify on this application? Come forward Ma'am. Sander: I'm Jill Sander and I live in the Haven Cove Subdivision and I'm one of the lots that will be backing up to. One of my questions I have to him is lighting, is this a 24-hour-type thing? Is it until 6 o'clock? Where will the lights be? Will they be on all night? He addressed the fence and that was my concern and that's satisfactory to me. I wasn't sure exactly what it is backing up to the -- there of - is that landscaping? Borup: That's the landscaping buffer. So it would be the fence, landscaping buffer and then parking. Sander: And then parking coming up to it. Then how far is it from - Borup: Are you one of the ones with out the fence? Sander: Where the fence is not where he is going to - Borup: Along there. Sander: Yes so how far is it from the lot to the building? There is that one down there on Fairview that backs right up to it. It looks like its pretty far away. Borup: We can take a look and get an - it looks far as like they have moved it about as far as (inaudible). Hatcher: Can we get that on record? Borup: Yes Bruce that was scaled off at 150-feet? Freckleton: Yes its approximately 150-feet from the extreme south corner of the structure to the property line. The north property line Haven Cove. The landscape buffer is 20-feet wide. Sander: The only thing I guess is the lighting. Borup: Is there anyone else that has any -why don't we go ahead and go through then he may be able to address them all at once. Lets go ahead and do that who ever would like to come up. Lingal: Dwayne Lingal and my question is - Borup: Could you repeat your name again? ~. ~ Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 33 Lingal: Dwayne Lingal. I live on 2153 Turnberry; it's around the corner. Did I understand that there was a single lane going in from Ten Mile? Borup: No it's two-way but its right-in and right-out. So hey cannot come out and turn left they will coming out and have to turn right. So they won't be doing cross traffic on Ten Mile. Lingal: But could traffic coming south turn in? Hatcher: No. Borup: No. Hatcher: North traffic can turn in and if you turn out you can only go north. Right- in, right-out. Borup: That type of traffic would have to come from Cherry Lane. Hatcher: The concrete barrier put in the road to prevent people from - Lingal: And are you going to discuss the building itself and what you're doing with that at this time? Borup: It's ahospital - Lingal: What are you doing when you say hospital? Full size. Hatcher: We can have the applicant further clarify that when he comes back up. Lingal: Has this been discussed before or is this first time? Borup: No this is the first time - Hatcher: This is the first meeting. Lingal: It appears like this has been discussed many times and - Hatcher: It has not. Lingal: -- this is the first time I've heard of it. Borup: This is the first public hearing. The applicant has spent a lot of time going over it with staff - Hatcher: This is the first time it's been in front of us. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 34 Lingal: So if you could help me understand what your are proposing it would help it would help. Borup: Are you wondering about the size of the building and hours of use? Lingal: Yes I would like to know if you're looking at an emergency care facility or whether its long term care or short term care. Those kind of things. Centers: Mr. Chairman. Borup: Commissioner Centers. Centers: Is the applicant making notes? Racine: Yes. Borup: Okay Ma'am. Gugan: I'm Judy Gugan, and I live at -actually down the street on Cherry Lane in Sunnybrook Farms Subdivision. My concern is already the traffic that is on Cherry Lane. With this going in even though you're going to have right-in right- out you are also going to impact the traffic on Cherry Lane. I have trouble getting out of subdivision at times now do to traffic on that - if I am going to turn and go to the right and go toward Ten Mile I am okay. But if I'm trying to go back toward Eagle Road or anywhere in the that area I have a difficulty getting out of that area. My concern is partly traffic also my concern is need. We have a lot of medical facilities within a short span of space from where most of us live. There is a clinic on the opposite corner from where this is proposed that is affiliated with St. Alphonsus. I don't notice that they are extremely busy so I do question need at this point for something this big. I don't know exactly - I'm concerned like this other gentleman as to how big it is, what the hours are these kind of things and the noise level. I mean are we talking ambulances coming up and down this street. This is a very busy street already and is there access into the facility off of Cherry Lane? Borup: I can answer the last one. Yes there is access on Cherry Lane. Gugan: So that's going to truly impact Cherry Lane even more than it is now. So that is my concern. Borup: Thank you. Do we have anyone else? Hansen: My name is Penny Hansen, and I live in the Sunburst Subdivision and I live right across the street from this thing. I'm curious about how many employees there are going to be coming and going out of this. The noise, ambulances. If you're going to purchase my place so I can move. The traffic is Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 35 terrible I work ten minutes from my house it takes me 20 minutes at least now to get to work with a 1,000 employees coming in and out of there. That's my concern. Borup: Thank you. Anyone else? Lingal: (inaudible) comments now or do you want them (inaudible) - Borup: I didn't understand the question. Lingal: I have concerns of the same nature but I would kind of like here what they're going to propose. Borup: That's what we are doing they are answering all the questions that were brought up. Lingal: (inaudible) speak again? Borup: Not necessarily. You need to state your name again. Lingal: Dwayne Lingal. Borup: I thought you said you were just repeating the same questions already been brought up. Lingal: No. Borup: Okay. Lingal: Dwayne Lingal, my concern not knowing exactly what they are proposing. But we have been a resident at our home for five years it's around the corner in Cherry Lane Golf Course. This is an area that provided a quality of life where it was quiet and it was peaceful. My real concern and I strongly oppose what you're showing me on paper without knowing exactly what you are doing. I really think you have traffic issues and you do have noise issues. I hope you will really consider what you are doing regarding the property that's going to need to be rezoned and the impact you are going to have on the community and the people that live there for the purpose of quietness and low traffic. Those are the main concerns that I have right now. I personally do not feel it would be community friendly to put something of that size and that nature on that property. I can see you putting it out by the freeway where there is more access and an easier possibility of getting in and out of there without bottle necking the intersection that's already a problem by the development that you've out in there already. Hatcher: Thank you. Chairman Borup. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 36 Borup: Commissioner Hatcher. Hatcher: I think it would be prudent to make a comment right now - I hadn't thought of this until public testimony. I live in Sunburst Subdivision I don't feel there is a conflict of interest here unless the Commission -someone else on the Commission feels otherwise that I need to step down. Nary: Do you live within 300 feet? Hatcher: I don't live within 300 feet. Maybe 305 but not within 300. Borup: I guess my only question would be do you feel you can be objective and - Hatcher: Like I said I don't feel there is a conflict of interest. Borup: I agree by the definition of conflict of interest. Okay, Mr. Racine. Nary: Mr. Chairman. Nary: I guess to follow Commissioner Hatcher's lead I live in Sunnybrook Farms Subdivision. I live down where the other lady does. But I also don't feel there is a conflict. I don't think there is a problem with it. Borup: Good because that would only leave two of us. Racine: Doug Racine with BRS Architects in response to the first ladies concerns or questions about lights. The current City Ordinance -there you are -the current City Ordinance requires (inaudible) lights are directed (inaudible) - Borup: You probably need get into the microphone. Racine: It can't be seen from your property line and we're going to have to comply with City Ordinance. We would have lights adjacent to that landscape buffer to light the parking. As to the duration of those light s being on I think this is a key question that a lot of the folks seem to have. I would like to mention that we did conduct a neighborhood meeting on the 13th of December and we mailed invitations to the same list as the official mailing notice. Centers: What date was that? Racine: The 13th of December. We did have a turn out of approximately 8 to 10 neighbors to review that. Unidentified: How far did you go? Borup: He went to the list. 300 feet. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 37 Racine: The list within a 300-foot radius, which is the public notice requirement. Unidentified: I'm sorry if you didn't but we mailed to the same people that if you were noticed by the City of this hearing you would have received a notice from us about that neighborhood meeting. We did the mailings - my apologies if you didn't receive one. Just to get to the nature of this facility it's not a hospital. It's an ambulatory care center. By definition in the Ordinance that means the patient stays have to be less than 24-hours. This can never become a hospital unless it's allowed by conditional use, which means another application to this board at some point in the future. Its not intended that it be a trauma center, an emergency clinic its not where -ambulances are going to be bringing in trauma patients and then transporting them off to a hospital care center. I think - Borup: You said no ambulances then? Racine: Well you could have an occasional ambulance if somebody collapsed in an outpatient scenario. But there's not going to be an emergency trauma component to this. To where you are bringing in people from traffic accidents. Again the key to this thing is - Borup: So the ambulance will be taking someone out not bringing someone in if at all? Racine: That's correct. Hatcher: No different than any other place - Borup: It could happen in a grocery store or anywhere else. Racine: That's correct. It's intended to be essentially for healthy outpatient type care. There's going to be a medical office building component for example there could be an optometrist that does laser surgery. Any sort of those outpatient stays. That's the intention of this facility. Its not a 24-hour operation the hours of operation is intended to be somewhere in the neighborhood between eight and seven at night. I think as far as need of this and the community I'll let the business development director from St. AI's speak to that in just a moment as to the need and the functions that are planned for this facility. But I want to emphasize its not a hospital its an ambulatory care center. As far as Cherry Lane traffic I think you gentleman have a copy of the ACRD staff report that identifies Cherry Lane right now as having a existing level of service C. I'm not all that familiar with the actual definition of level of service C. A being the best F being the worst. C seems to an acceptable level of service in their report they do note that with the project build out it would still be better than level C service. I understand the frustration with traffic I've lived in Boise my whole life. I've seen it go from a small community to a rather large community and traffic is one of those Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 38 frustrations. I think as far as traffic goes with regard to this project it seems to be acceptable at least in ACHD's definitions of levels of service. I believe I addressed the type of the use, the lights whether it's a 24-hour operation and there be helicopters and ambulances coming here, there won't be. It won't be a hospital. It can't become a hospital, which by definition the patient stays over 24- hours unless we come back to this board and the City of Meridian for another Conditional Use Permit. As far as the rezone of the property I think the proposed Comprehensive Plan for Meridian currently indicates or would suggest this property be zoned commercial, which would allow retail type establishments. I think our L-O use or district that we're seeking -zone change that we are seeking is a lesser impact than a retail to the surrounding neighborhood. The type of traffic were generating - I think there was a question about the number of employees and we're looking at roughly at -again I'll let Mike speak to this more precisely but somewhere in the neighborhood of 70 to 80 full time employees. That's staffed in shifts its not at any one time you would have that many employees. We're not looking at a 1,000 employees as may have been mentioned earlier. I don't that there were any other questions that I missed. Borup: That was the last one I had down (inaudible) it was employees so - Hatcher: I would like to - Borup: Commissioner Hatcher. Hatcher: -- testimony from the business manager. Racine: If I could introduce him right now. Borup: Commissioner Nary. Nary: Looking on the site map here it appears the building is -three separate buildings. Racine: That's correct - Nary: Each building is -the two main buildings Building A Building B are each approximately 30,000 square feet each one. Racine: That's right two floors. Nary: Then the single-story building says 18,000. I think on the site plan. Racine: That's asingle-floor. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 39 Nary: I'm not an architect or builder can you give me some example of how big that building -each of those buildings is in relation to the Albertson's that is across the street. Racine: Well the Albertson's across the street is probably in the neighborhood of about 65,000 I think is what they usually build their stores at. The typical top (inaudible) wall elevation is roughly 24-feet, 8-inches. We've got slopping metal roofs in the elevations the peak of those mansard roofs would be in the neighborhood of 32. The underside of those I believe are - Hatcher: The LDS church is a lot taller. Racine: About 24. Hatcher: That's not including the steeple. Nary: It's smaller in scale and height than the Albertson's across the street - Racine: -- well the Albertson's - Nary: -- each building is smaller - Racine: Smaller yes. Nary: -- than the Albertson's building across the street. The two of them together are close in size to the building. Racine: We want to emphasize to that -- if you could flip the site plan back for me -were looking at two two-story buildings as an initial phase one. Then the angled wing, which is single-floor. I would like to emphasize it was purposely made single-floor for the neighbors. We met with staff when we first started talking about this conceptually as you can see it would make a lot more sense to put the multiple floor portion of the development essentially where we have the single wing because there is a lot more parking available to that area. But when we met with staff they suggested that because of the residential nature of the surrounding properties to go in with multiple story building in that portion of the site would be -staff wasn't sure they could support it. Based on that we went with the single wing at that portion of the building that's most close to the residential properties to lessen the impact. We kept the higher multi- story portion closer to Cherry Lane and to the church, which is a little more compatible. Lingal: (inaudible). Racine: I don't know -- speak into the microphone Hatcher: Yes please. Meridian Planning and Zoning .;ommission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 40 Racine: This is what we are proposing in the context of the Conditional Use Permit planned unit development. It's a brick veneer with a standing C metal roof. It'll be a mansard so in other words it won't go up to a single roof peak. So any of the mechanical units that will be needed for heating, venting and air conditioning will be screened by the mansard roof. Brick veneer, green tinted windows we proposed these color schemes initially just as a starting point they're compatible with cancer treatment center we just finished in Caldwell. They are subject to some minor revision only in the context of what staff would feel acceptable. I think that staff could reiterate what we're proposing is a planned unit development we're going to be restricted to develop within the general definition of the planned unit development. In other words we cannot come in and suddenly make it three floors or drastically change the architectural style or increase the square-footage of the buildings with out coming back to this board. Minor variations like a change in colors color hue, small architectural details, acceptable building orientations that can be handled by staff. Lingal: (inaudible). Racine: Why a metal roof? We used a sloping roof to try to fit in I think more in context with the residential around as opposed to just a flat roof situation. Metal does afford Ithink -- it's a better roofing product than other types of roof materials you could put on a sloped roof in many cases. There is concrete looking tile; asphalt shingles a lot of others. We just picked this again -its compatible with our cancer treatment center in Caldwell, which has a metal roof on it. We're trying to develop kind of an architectural style if you will. Lingal: (inaudible). Racine: Yes. It's the same tone of brick, same color metal roof, green tinted glazing. Hatcher: Chairman Borup. Racine: I think you could by and say it doesn't - Borup: We need to interrupt his here. This is going the wrong direction on the conversation. Racine: Okay. Hatcher: You do have a right to know but technically he is to address the board and not the audience. We'll address your concerns. You address them to us he addresses them to us. We've given leniency for the one-on-one conversation. Chairman Borup. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 41 Borup: Commissioner Hatcher. Hatcher: Doug could you address the exterior finish materials for architect to architect. What exactly are you looking at? Are you looking at a Solex three type glazing? Racine: It would be an insulated low E green tinted glass. Hatcher: What type of window framing are we looking at a clear anodized? Racine: Clear anodized aluminum. Hatcher: Clear anodized or dark bronze no clear? Racine: Yes clear. Hatcher: What kind type of brick finishes are we looking at? Racine: It's a standard modular brick veneer. Hatcher: Are you looking at like an intestate brick? Racine: Yes it's an interstate - Hatcher: Veneer or structural? Racine: It's an interstate - Hatcher: It is an interstate? Racine: Yes. It's very preliminary what we're proposing - Hatcher: Right but conceptually I want to get a - Racine: We're probably looking at something -- steel framed building with a brick veneer. Interstate brick type. Hatcher: The metal roofing - Racine: Metal roofing standing seams - Hatcher: Pacific Clad or something? Racine: Or NBCI. We used a bright silver out at the cancer treatment center. Hatcher: Are you proposing a silver metal roof on this one? Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 42 Racine: We we're thinking about it. I think that's subject to - I'm not sure what the processes are for color review if that's the venue here. Hatcher: Its part of this board right here. Racine: Again we were proposing gray silver to fit in with color palette that we had out at the cancer treatment center. It was my discussions with Brad that we could function - we may not end up with these specific colors. We would review all colors with staff and if they felt it was acceptable they would let us proceed. Unidentified: (inaudible). Hatcher: Okay thank you. Racine: I don't think - Hatcher: You've answered my question. At this time since we don't have a DR sub-committee established yet there's little more we can do about it. Racine: Okay. Borup: Did you want any comment from the - Hatcher: I would love to hear from the Borup: Business manager. Hatcher: St. AI's personnel. Ondracek: My name is Mike Ondracek I'm the director of business development at St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center. I appreciate the comments made by some of the neighborhood residents out there. Again to address this is not a hospital that we're putting out at Ten Mile west Cherry Lane. We're putting a comprehensive ambulatory care center to meet the growing needs of the citizens in Meridian. Those types of services are going to be same day operations; you referenced our primary care clinic at catty corner there at Ten Mile and West Cherry Lane. That's a primary care clinic we're looking to compliment our primary care clinic with our specialty services. Same day surgery, dermatology, outpatient rehab services. The things that we see our patients across the street for primary care could have continuity could come over for specialized services. It will not be 24-hours it will be as Doug Racine indicated Monday through Friday Probably eight a.m. to seven p.m. We will grow with the needs of the community. We found with prior experience that working families like to have after-hours care and access. So as that demand grows we would have extended hours in the evening. Again seven eight o'clock at night would be the very latest. We could Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 43 have Saturday clinic as well. Specialized care but more predominately it's going to be Monday through Friday. Its not going to be a trauma center so the gentleman that indicated only ambulances that would leave actually this facility In the event they would have to go a hospital setting no ambulance would be coming in a trauma nature at atl. The number of employees looking at any given time 40 to 50 employees would be there. The building on your left Building a represents a public medical office building with physician clinics. Its typically you would have about two point five staff members to every full time physician. Then the other building on the right Building B represents more of a diagnostic, which is X-ray, lab a pharmacy in there. We could have again some outpatient surgery at any given time we could have additional maybe 15 to 20 staff in that side. So collectively 40 to 50 employees at a given time. But maybe up to 75 employees through out the given working hour of the day. Part of St. AI's goal is to grow with the community Meridian has represented a tremendous amount of growth. I've only been here actually for the last seven months but still recognize a tremendous amount of growth to this community. Part of St. AI's mission is to grow with the community's needs providing health care that has represented what they want. A focus group that was done last year -they did not want a type of St. Luke's, which is off the freeway that's not really growing with the community. St. Luke's Hospital off of Meridian does support a good (inaudible) need to the community. But that's not why St. AI's wants to be in Meridian our goal is to grow with community in an ambulatory care setting. Same day we will blend in Doug Racine talked about the color of the facility we are looking at branding St. Alphonsus as far as a look out there. But more important to St. Alphonsus is to have a look consistent with that neighborhood. It's important as we recognize structurally what we did in Caldwell. They have a very nice facility out there the cancer center off the freeway. Really our goal in this community is grow with that and share that the integrity of our facility and the colors dimensions supports that growth and surroundings. So as far as a shiny silver rooftop we probably wont do that. But it will be something compatible with the neighborhood with that development out there so that was a point I wanted to make as well. I think that addresses most of your questions but I would be happy to entertain any more that you may have. Borup: Any questions from the Commissioners? Nary: Mr. Chairman. Borup: Commissioner Nary. Nary: Mr. Ondracek, I heard you say what was in Building A and Building B what is in Building C? Ondracek: Building C right now that's actually in phase two. We have thoughts about maybe more of a women and children's center. Its not clearly defined right now. There is a lot of talk in the medical community has far as specialized ~'.. ~,~. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 44 niches of health care and one of the latest trends (inaudible) women's and children's center. If that trend continues it will give us the option and flexibility down the road to look at something like that. Again it would be more of the same day medical care nature that is consistent with the other two facilities. We wouldn't look at building out phase two, which is Building C for probably two to three years at the earliest after we complete phase one. We would look if all would go well with City approvals that we would not start construction until later this year. It would be at least two to three years out from December of 2002 so it would be down the road. Health care is always changing so we need to be flexible to those demands. Nary: Mr. Chairman there was some other question that was brought up by some of the public about the traffic concerns. I looked at ACHD's study I'm assuming this is a typo because they refer to the building as 188,000 square-feet - Ondracek: I think we called t at to their attention it's a build out of 95,000. Nary: They don't list any particular what they perceive that the trip counts will be from this facility. At least I didn't see it. It talked about what the current level of traffic is. Has there been any traffic studies done or anything like that by you folks? Ondracek: I believe so and Doug Racine can speak to that as far as looking at additional trips to the site. I can speak to (inaudible) philosophy that there is going to be a tremendous amount more traffic coming into this center more of a destination point verses people surrounding the community just coming in for care. I think it will be two fold I think they will be a number of neighbors within the community that live in close proximity to this site that will come right to this site. By the nature of as our specialized same day care there will be traffic that will come lets say one to three miles away to the center as well. But we represent a good percent of population coming right around the nucleus here but some traffic would come. Lets say one to three to five miles from the site. Doug Racine can speak to additional traffic counts. Borup: Any other questions from the Commission? Nary: The only other comment I was going to make because - is it Mrs. Hanson is that your name ma'am? You live on Ann Street? Okay because you are listed on the list of mailings you had said previously you hadn't received it. Hanson: I got this last one for this but I didn't get any others. Nary: I see okay. That's all. Borup: Okay thank you. Mr. Racine did you have some information on the traffic? Meridian Planning and Zoning .,ommission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 45 Racine: In response to questions on an additional traffic study no one was not done for this. In reviewing the project with ACHD staff as you can see in their tech report one wasn't required. There is a line - Borup: They base there - on type of building and type of use and normal traffic - Racine: Type of traffic type of use that's correct. I did speak to Christie Richardson at Planning and Development with ACHD and did point out that they had an error on the total square-footage of the proposed building. She did acknowledge that could affect their trip generation figures, which of course is important to us from traffic contribution to Cherry Lane not to mention the ACRD impact fees that will have to be paid for this. Even with that higher traffic count and the I do not see - I see a total traffic count on October 4, 2000 of 9,224. I'm not exactly what period of time that is if that's for the whole day I assume that's what it is. I don't think there was any -there's nothing that I can see that indicates what the trip generation for this facility would be. The only thing I see in reference to this is that currently that Cherry Lane has a better than C level of existing service and then the line below that refers that it would still be a better than C existing service including the project build out level of service. I'm hopeful with the correction in their analysis getting the right building square-footage the trip generation would even improve. Borup: Makes sense. Racine: I hope that's helpful. Nary: Would it be fair to say then just so these neighbors understand. ACRD miscalculated their error as to the size of the building but even with that what they perceive to be a larger facility - Racine: That's correct. Nary: They didn't anticipate that he traffic would increase significantly. Racine: That's correct. Nary: So what you are saying with the decrease in the size of the building it shouldn't make any significant difference either. Racine: That's correct you should still have a better than C level of service on Cherry Lane. Nary: Thank you. Racine: You're welcome. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 46 Borup: Okay any other questions from the Commissioners? One last time before we started we went over the agenda that the applicant would have his chance - Lingal: I sure appreciate you letting have mine again. Borup: Go ahead. Lingal: Please keep in mind St. Luke's when they first went over on Eagle Road they were not going to be hospital. Borup: Yes they were. Lingal: In the first phase. Borup: Right and they weren't. Hatcher: The first phase they weren't. Borup: They had a - Lingal: My concern now is that would be an opportunity once they are in there to be more than what they are creating here. Borup: You are afraid they are going to go in and tear out the houses and (inaudible) - Lingal: No I'm afraid that we're going to change our community in the fact that we have a golf community, a quiet neighborhood and in my opinion you're changing the atmosphere of our community that we live in at Ten Mile and Cherry Lane. It might not affect your lives but it certainly affects mine. Hatcher: It affects my life a whole lot more than you could possibly imagine. Borup: Half the Commissioners here - Lingal: But it does affect our lives - Borup: Sounds like you would rather see another retail store there then? Lingal: Not necessarily it's a resi -what's R-4? Borup: R-4 is residential. As was stated the Comprehensive Plan calls - Lingal: Residential. Borup: No Comprehensive Plan allows for commercial use. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 48 Hawkins-Clark: Commissioner I think the only other thing to point out I don't think ~ ~ -reT Meridian Planning and Zoning~ommission Meeting ~Ir' January 18, 2001 Page 47 Lingal: And please respect what you have out there. It's not like were a commercial area we're a community of rural setting. It's not as much now because of the planning and the zoning that's out there. It was a quiet neighborhood not long ago and we would like to keep it that way. I think I'm speaking on behalf of many of my neighbors and equally the people that are here. Centers: Do you shop at Albertson's? Lingal: No I don't. Centers: Communities require services. Whether they are isolated communities or- Lingal: They don't require - Centers: I don't mean to be smart about it but you need them. Lingal: No, I appreciate that exactly. Centers: But you do have to shop someplace. You do have to have healthcare someplace. Lingal: But we're not living In the City. I mean you're bringing everything out to us. Hatcher: You are in the City now. Lingal: If we need something we can go into town for it. Borup: And create more traffic. Nary: Mr. Chairman. Borup: Commissioner Nary. Lingal: If that's the response of the Commissioners I'm here to say please respect what we have out there. I'm not here to cause a problem I'm here to say we have a community that's quiet that has more traffic now than its ever had but we certainly don't need more from every direction coming in to this area. I hope you will respect that. Borup: I think we do but this Commission also has responsibility of the City as a whole the community as a whole. I think -does staff have any final comments? Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 49 a reason that wasn't there or a reason that it wasn't included or thought it wasn't important. I don't know. Borup: We can certainly add that. Hatcher: We can certainly add it that's right. I think we have - Borup: Brad was (inaudible) - Hawkins-Clark: I'm done. Borup: Okay. Hatcher: Chairman Borup. Borup: Commissioner Hatcher. Hatcher: I think it's also pertinent to bring out to the other Commissioners and to the public also in this situation this type of facility. I think its fair so that's you guys can have a better idea of what it is we are dealing with there is that in a risk of insulting St. AI's what we're looking at here is a doctors office on steroids. That's all it is all right. We are not looking at a hospital we're not looking at ambulances; we're not looking at trauma facilities. We're looking at a two-story building in phase one. We're looking at a one-story building in phase two. This is a glorified doctors office that will allow them to do procedures that doctors offices can't do and that you wouldn't have to go to a hospital to have done. Quite frankly it is my opinion I am in Sunburst I am literally not - *~`*End of Side Three*** Hatcher: -- at least 305 feet away from this project. I welcome this project as a neighbor. I live probably closer to the traffic than any of you except for this lady here. Because my house backs up to Ten Mile I don't live on a golf course I live on Ten Mile. I welcome this project because your alternative is retail. You want to talk about traffic problems retail is going -which can be put on that property. This one however is going to provide to our neighborhood a service that is needed. It's going to provide to us an hour of operation that's going to be in little conflict to the rest of us. Because most of the people that will work there will have already left before we get there on our way home. You want to talk about a disruption to our neighborhood to our rural community that Albertson's not this project. I have no -there's nothing in this for me but I would much rather see Albertson's never been built. That's a disruption, that's a traffic problem. I think that basically some of the concerns that are being brought up I believe that there is a legitimate with lighting that lady here and it's going to potentially affect you too. That's is on the burden of the designer and it is part of our City Ordinance that those lights not disrupt you. If that light does disrupt you at any time after Meridian Planning and Zoning t;ommission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 50 the power has been switched on you have a right to come to the City and complain and have it changed while it s still under construction. Because there shall not be any glare or disruption of light in to your property. That's part of the City requirements. We as a board here not only need to protect the public and that's you and us we don't get paid for this we're volunteers officials. We are the public it's the City Council that makes final decision. But as a board we also have an obligation to the City what is in the best interest of the City. What is in the best interest of the community? I will vote for this project and I live just down the street. Borup: Thank you. Maybe just a question for probably for Mike on hours of operation. As stated right now it would be about seven a.m. to no eight a.m. to seven p.m. Is that correct? You say in the future if there was public need you could go to eight o'clock? Ondracek: Eight o'clock even on Saturday. Borup: So if we had some type of restriction from eight a.m. to eight p.m. on the hours. Ondracek: I would caution the Commission - Borup: We probably need to get you on the microphone. Ondracek: In response to your question about a restriction of hours of operation. My 10 years of health care experience in primary care and specialty care in an ambulatory setting would suggest that you grow within the needs of the citizens of the community. For me to stand here and say I would restrict our ability to meet that growing need I probably wouldn't be in the best position to do that. At current state that would be fine I would think staff would get there by seven-thirty patients would start coming in about eight a.m. Some patients would actually love to come in at seven a.m. for their appointment before work so we are trying to meet that need as well. I don't envision we go beyond eight o'clock if we are doing outpatient surgery we would have the capability to schedule cases later in the day again to meet the customers needs. If that was an hour-and-half procedure we could be there until eight-thirty. So I would hate to say we would have to close by eight o'clock if it was eight-thirty. Within that general parameter you are correct. But I would hate to put a stipulation on that. Centers: You're not going to be there until midnight? Ondracek: No heavens no. Centers: You would never - Ondracek: No. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 51 Centers: Okay. I would have to agree with you and Chairman Borup to be restrictive on eight to eight I don't think we can do that. Ondracek: It is our full intent to generally be eight to eight or eight to seven. Hatcher: I would say 6 to 10. Ondracek: Yes if you said 6 to 10 again with same day or circle cases if you historically had outpatient surgery sometimes people get in at 6 a.m. to be prepped for or by seven a.m. So if you want to put something like 6 a.m. at the very earliest scenario would be and 10 p.m. would be the very latest scenario. Within in those parameters I would be very comfortable. Borup: It sounds like you are saying on the hours on the extreme ends you're talking maybe one or two patients that may have requested those hours and a small staff that would be accommodating them it sounds like. Ondracek: It would be a small staff to accommodate those few patients it would be very rare - Hatcher: You have to take into consideration too I just made the comment 6 to 10 but you have to take into consideration not just the applicants needs also the communities needs. If 10 p.m. is to late for the adjoining neighbors then it's our responsibility to say sorry St. AI's you can't stay open after eight. You need to shut down at eight because of your neighbors. If you want to be part of the neighborhood shut down at eight. Borup: Albertson's in open until when? Nary: Midnight. Hatcher: I think Albertson's is open until midnight I think they open at six and close at midnight. Borup: I think we can - Centers: What does staff think? Borup: I think the other thing they can still come in with an adjustment or amendment on the CUP if the need arises too. Centers: That's under Item No. 7 anyway. The CUP. The hours would be under the CUP. Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 52 Borup: Right yes. Okay maybe just before you leave Mike just for the record could you spell your name? Ondracek: Sure Ondracek. Borup: Thank you. Nary: Mr. Chairman. Borup: Commissioner Nary. Nary: I guess I just had a couple of comment son the heels of Commissioner Hatcher as I said I just live on the next subdivision over and I recognize what one of the members of the public said about traffic and all of that. I think what everybody needs to understand is we are trying to look at what is the best use of the facilities along Cherry Lane. It is currently zoned R-4, which if some of you were here earlier when we were discussing the subdivision that was an R-4 subdivision but they are talking about three house per acre. This about almost nine-acres so you're looking at 25 to 30 houses they may be able to squeeze into that space depending on the size of the lots. If you were actually just to build more houses on Cherry Lane. We have to make a decision as to - in our Comprehensive Plan calls for this to be more commercial. Most of you weren't here a few weeks ago we had a discussion about the other empty weed patch down the road by Linder Road and Cherry Lane. And they wanted to build a commercial facility there that might have been a 24-hour facility and might have been at least until midnight and we weren't real clear as to what they wanted to do. I'll tell you my opinion and I am not speaking on behalf of other Commissioner or myself. Is I don't necessarily believe we need to build a whole lot more houses right on Cherry Lane. I don't think that's going to help anything. Some part of what we're looking to evaluate is relieving trips from people. If somebody has to currently drive from Sunnybrook Farms Subdivision or Sunburst Subdivision all the way to Boise or to the St. Luke's facility or somewhere else just to get this type of care. They are driving down Fairview they are returning down Fairview they are going to be driving down Cherry Lane. They are going to be causing more traffic than if they can drive ahalf-of-a-mile and then drive back home. Or they can even depending on what it is some of those are doctors offices probably I'm sure people can walk there for some of the needs that will be provided. The hope is it's going to relieve some of the traffic. Its not an exact science by any stretch of the imagination but that's the hope that some of these things can do. We have to evaluate as a Commission is if we decide that this is not the appropriate use on that property and that's not what we think should be there then we can deny it. If we deny it something else will come along and propose to be there. Currently the plan is to make that a commercial site. I'm sure most of you would prefer not to have that. That generally has more traffic it generally has more hours of operation it generally has more people coming from a further distance away than this type of facility. I don't think this is Meridian Planning and Zoning .,ommission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 53 something that going to have people drive from Nampa or Caldwell regularly to service. This is the type of facility that is meant to serve a fairly small area of the community to be able access (inaudible). Part of the reason I asked the question the earlier in regards to the size of the building again I'm not an architect so when you put the number up there it doesn't mean anything to me. But I want to know if I'm driving down Cherry Lane how does this relate to the building across the street? At least the information I received was that the two buildings together are approximately the size, the two main buildings are approximately the size of the building across the street. That doesn't offend me visually that offend me as a neighbor to this project because that's at least in my opinion compatible with what should be there. Smaller profile buildings smaller profile project is a better use than what potentially what could be there like a retail store like a Target or a K-Mart smaller scale. Those are things that are more troubling to me along Cherry Lane. I understand what Mr. Lingal is saying that we would like to have a more -more of that particular part of town to be more somewhat I guess urban rural as it has been. But its not realistically going to be that way that's not was intended by the City in the Comprehensive Plan. Realistically along Cherry Lane we're trying to look at what can we do to sort of break up the houses a little bit provide some services and offices and things like that that people can use. So they don't drive all the way down Cherry Lane and all the way down to Boise. That's what we are faced with. To put that all in a nutshell at least what we're faced with is this good or bad? Is this the very best use we may ever see for this property? I don't know. Is this the very best use before us for what could be there for what it's trying to provide what they have put together as a site plan for this? Yes I think it is I think this is probably better than what we could have instead. Its not perfect the City Council ultimately gets to make that decision on this if we choose to approve it as to whether or not this is appropriate. That's what we have to look at. What can we do here to make this a better usable site? At least in my opinion I think St. AI's has tried to do that. They're providing something that doesn't exist currently that is different than what we have in that location and yet they are providing it at least in a style and a manner that still is at least reasonably compatible. It doesn't look like a big house so its not going to look exactly like the neighborhood buts its going to look better than a big cement block building that is across street that at least its trying to do those things. Again it the type of use that still isn't going to generate as much traffic as the other uses that might go on there instead of this. Borup: We do have both hearings open at this time. Hatcher: If there is no further questions from the other Commissioners I would move that we close the public hearing. Nary: Second. Borup: On both items? Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 54 Hatcher: On both items. Borup: Been moved and second to close the public hearings on Items No. 6 and 7. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Borup: Item No. 6 is request for rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O. Hatcher: Chairman Borup. Borup: Commissioner Hatcher. Hatcher: I would like to make a motion that we recommend approval to City Council for RZ 00-010 request for rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for the proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center at the corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road to include all staff comments. Nary: Second. Borup: Motion is second. Any discussion? Centers: I would like that motion to include the fact that that parking - Borup: We - Hatcher: This is the rezone. Borup: This is just for the rezone Centers: Excuse me your correct. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Borup: The second one is for the Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner Hatcher. Hatcher: I would like to recommend approval to City Council for CUP 00-056 request for Conditional Use Permit for St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center to construct a planned development for ambulatory outpatient care center with adjacent bank development at the southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road to include staff comments and to include the following. First item is that we restrict hours of operation in CUP from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Second that prior to the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 55 City Council meeting that the applicant resolve to staff satisfaction the east west access road connecting Ten Mile Road as it relates to the safety of parking. Borup: The applicant had committed to fence on the southern boundary. Hatcher: Third item would be that the southern most property line be provided with a standard six-foot cedar fence as per City Ordinance requirements. Nary: I think there was a request by the staff to amend Number 6 to reflect its two parcels not three. Hatcher: Good catch I forgot to write that one down. Nary: And that there be a through the nine parking stalls on 12F. Hatcher: That's in the staff comments. Nary: Oh you're right I'm sorry. Borup: So you want to add - Hatcher: We just want to add Item No. 4 clarification that we're not looking at three parcel that we are looking at the relocation of a parcel line. Borup: Did you get all that Larry? Okay that was very lengthy - Hatcher: That was only four items. Borup: That's good we need to include it all in. Centers: I'll second that. Borup: We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Nary: I just wanted to add one more thing for the record Mr. Chairman again so partly maybe the record is clear. What we're required under 11-17-3 of the City Code is to look at the applicant complies with approximately nine different things. At least in the testimony that we have heard and again not to diminish the neighbors testimony. I think what we tried to do in some of these changes is to meet the requirements of the code and I think the applicant has attempted to meet the requirements of the code. There isn't really anything at least in my opinion and looking at this section of the code that we haven't at least attempted to address by this Conditional Use Permit. Just generally its things like design and compatibility with the neighborhood and trying to find the best use of the property and not providing something that's hazard or dangerous to the community and the vehicular approaches will be compatible and ACRD has done Meridian Planning and Zoning commission Meeting January 18, 2001 Page 56 that. In what is required by the City code that we need to address and making that I think the applicant and the modifications we've suggested and what the staff has already come up with do meet all of those requirements. I think that's what we're here to be looking at. Borup: Any other discussion? All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSENT Item 8. Public Hearing: CUP 00-057 Request for Conditional Use Permit to construct an Office /Warehouse in an I-L zone for Big D Builders by Treasure Valley Engineers, Inc. -King Street and Baltic Place, 200 North Baltic Place: Borup: Thank you Commissioners and thank you for those who attended here. Item No. 8 public hearing request for Conditional Use Permit to construct an Office Warehouse in an I-L zone for Big D Builders at King Street and Baltic Place; address is 200 North Baltic Place. I would like to open this public hearing and start with the staff report. Hawkins-Clark: Thank you Chairman Borup. This project is single building on the parcel that is crosshatched here. This is the Meridian Business and Industrial Park just off of Franklin Road the new fire station is here. The purpose for the CUP is that the building is proposed to be within existing 100-year floodplain, which is pointed out here on the map, the darker color gray scale there is the boundary. Pointing to the site is just within the southern boundary there. Existing uses around include the block business to the east this is a nine-foot block wall along the eastern boundary. This is on Baltic looking sort of north easterly here. The buildings adjacent. This is taken this is the north property line and as you can see they have already brought in some fill here. As far as the conditions here's some proposed for the building. We just ask that the conditions in our January 12, 2001, memo be incorporated into your motion. As far as discussion on the site plan itself that staff has had along this north boundary their will as I understand from Steve a shared driveway, and maybe the applicants can speak further, but shared driveway here that will access the other existing facility they have some overhead doors that will be used for storage. The landscaping actually will not be required according to our new landscape code if its going to be shared and get a joint use the landscaping would get in the way there. There's a retaining wall on the north boundary and then I believe the other change is Ada County Highway District did ask to move the north driveway to align with King Street. Here's King Street coming in along the -little line here instead of being here at the north end it would come down. I'm sorry when I was talking about the retaining wall and landscaping I was referring to this boundary here not this one. This is Baltic that landscaping will remain. I think that's all we have. Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 50 Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the request for Conditional Use Permit for the childcare center for 24 children in a R-15 zone for proposed ABC club, daycare and preschool. Have the Attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law including staff comments. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 13. Public Hearing: RZ 00-010 Request to rezone 8.88 acres from an R-4 zone to an L-O zone for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center by BRS Architects - southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road Corrie: At this point I will open the Public Hearing and staff comments first please. Stiles: I am having a little technical difficulty here my battery ran out for a minute. Mr. Mayor and members of Council this is a request for a rezone of 8.88 acres from the current zoning of R-4 to and L-O zone. The property is located at the southeast corner of Ten Mile and Cherry Lane. Albertson's grocery store is here with the retail shops. There is an existing office building, doctor's office building, that I believe is currently owned by St. Alphonsus. There is a church in this location here also another church here. It is surrounded by the Haven Cove subdivision on either side. They are requesting the rezone to facilitate an outpatient and ambulatory care center. I believe Ada County Highway District has made one change on their plan. I do not know if you have a copy of it in your packet, but the applicant had verbally informed me today that Ada County Highway District had approved an access in this location. It is approximately 205-feet from the intersection. Their normal standard is 220-feet for a right in right out only, because they did not have adequate frontage on Ten Mile, they had approved a lesser distance from the intersection. This Public Hearing is for the rezone only and the request for a limited office designation for this area. The following Public Hearing will address the details of the Conditional Use Permit for a planned development for their proposed facilities. That is all I have, if you have any questions. De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: I do not have questions for staff at this time, but I do need to declare- Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 51 Nichols: Councilwoman De Weerd, Mayor, and members of the Council if you have had any ex-party communications from anybody on these applications, I would ask that you would declare them on the record now. De Weerd: Mr. Mayor, they were not ex-party, but I did talk to Dwayne Lingel about a procedural matters that came out of the Planning and Zoning meeting that he had concerns of. We did not talk about the application, but he did ask me to listen to it for procedural content as council liaison to Planning and Zoning. I did do that, and called back Mr. Lingel to tell him that we had addressed some of the issues he had raised at our Planning and Zoning workshop and suggested that any comments he had regarding the project itself that he submit in writing or testify at this hearing. I believe that the City did receive a letter for Mr. Lingel that is also part of public testimony. McCandless: Mr. Mayor, I also had a conversation with Mr. Lingel along the same lines as Tammy was talking about, mainly about procedure at the P & Z. I also suggested to him that he attend this hearing and give us his comments. Corrie: Mr. Attorney does that satisfy the requirements of the law? Nichols: Mr. Mayor, I believe it does. Thank you. Corrie: That being said, the applicant pleases first. Adrauchik: My name is Mike Adrauchik. I am the Director of Business Development at St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center. I am here to show you tonight our intentions and our plans of developing a medical office facility along with a same day surgical center at Ten Mile and West Cherry Lane. I apologize I have had the flu for the five days, so the voice is just coming back. Hopefully 6- feet is enough distance for you. I want to share with you how we came to this location about 2 years ago we conducted actually a focus group outside of St. Alphonsus to recognize perhaps what St. Alphonsus needed to be outside of Boise. We conducted that focus group through an outside firm, and they talked to two different groups in the City of Meridian in and around that location, not specific to Ten Mile and Cherry Lane but in that general area. They were very clear as to what they felt they needed in their neighborhood. They were very clear that they did not want a hospital. They did not want and ER, they did not want life flight or trauma center in their backyard. What they did want was medical services coming to their neighborhood that would compliment what they felt they needed on an 80 percent basis of medical care. What they truly needed high tertiary inpatient medical services, they could go to a St. Lukes or a St. Alphonsus off the freeway or in Boise for those services. We recognize that and that is when we started our planning as far what would be good location to grow with the City of Meridian which has realized significant growth in the last 10 years and projected to assume additional growth in the next 10 years. When we looked at this location, this location represented good substantial growth Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 52 historically and in the future. We put together an option to purchase that land over a year ago, and November of 2000 we actually purchased that land. When we purchased that land, we decided we wanted to make sure we met the needs of the citizens of Meridian. Recognizing that we decided we wanted to have a medical office building that could house up to 25 positions in that facility, and Darrell Fugood is going to grab this board which will represent a visual as far as what we are feeling. Building A is a building represented on the top left, it is going to be a medical office building, two story supporting up to 25 medical physicians to have their doctor's offices. There would be some primary care doctors in that building and also specialty doctors like dermatology, ears nose and throat, general surgery, optimology, eye doctors things like that along with family practice, general pediatrics, and internal medicine. Recognizing that the transition of medical care is going from and inpatient scenario to an outpatient setting because of technology. We recognize the value to have adjacent to our medical office building a same day medical surgical center. That way our physicians that are in the medical building that also do surgical procedures that patients that also need that type of care, patient conveyance, they can go right down the hallway, and doctors can perform a same day medical procedure, knee surgery, eye surgery, things like that. Again, 25 physicians this would represent about 75 staff total that would be in this facility. That would be the maximum at any given time. Again 25 physicians probably would max anytime there would be 20 physicians in that building. Beyond just medical care services we would provide in there, there is also going to be wellness programs from newborn classes to geriatric services to community wellness education programs. St. Alphonsus' goal is not to just cookie cutter what we feel needs to go in there. We have also been very deliberate the last two years actually that is why we have been looking at Meridian so long to make sure we accurately represented what we felt needed to go in there. It is going to be comprehensive in nature from medical services to medical wellness programs at that sight. We have taken a look at based on the input we got based at the Planning and Zoning meeting we had some very good dialogue with the neighborhood, also we had an opportunity to talk to both of the representatives at the LDS church and the Seventh-Day Adventist Church neither one of the churches had strong oppositions or any in opposition to that, but some of the concerns from the neighbors out there represented increased traffic. Some of the lighting concerns that may be because of the outside lighting we may have, maybe the perception that we are going to be an ER out there as well and just I guess the increased overall traffic to that location. We went ahead and did various studies looking at the lighting out there that we are proposing along with increased traffic, and we also looked at our hours of operation. Our hours of operation that we got indorsed by Planning and Zoning was 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. It is our intention and desire that we are going to be open at that facility Monday through Friday with probable hours more like 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. I assured the Planning and Zoning Commission that we would grow an ease of the community. It could be as late as 10 p.m., but most likely it will be 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Friday probably open on Saturday as well. We will have at our medical office building primary care Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 53 doctors, and there was a question about urgent care services out there, and if it is urgent care flashing outside that building would represent an ER, and then a lot of patients coming in thinking it is an ER and then what would that mean. I came actually from the state of Missouri and managed several family practice offices. We did not urgent cares as they are defined here in Idaho. What we did was we took our family practice clinics and just expanded their hours, and that way patients recognized what it was through our medical office building, not a separate center through a surgery center and patients think again it is something that it is not. It is going to be an extension of our family practice clinic in our medical office building it would just expand all those hours. I wanted to share some of the concerns about a free seeming urgent care center, that is truly not what we are intending here, it is going to be a comprehensive medical doctor's office with same day surgery and medical procedures as well. I will refer to Doug Racine, he is our Architect that has been working with our local consultants on our lighting program, we brought him with his son as well, and some of the traffic studies that might address some of your technical specific issues. If you had any specifics for me I would be happy to address them right now. McCandless: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. McCandless. McCandless: You were talking about same day services, is that outpatient surgery? Adrauchik: That is correct ma'am. Same day services in the fact that with our hours defined by Planning and Zoning from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. patients would routinely come in and see a doctor, one of the 25 physicians, at the medical office building. If that physician deemed warrant that they needed a more medical procedure that was more surgical in nature and that needs to done more at our surgical center down the hallway, then they would been seen either that day in that center or rescheduled during those office hours in that surgery center side. So they get care done that same day and then go home of course that same day. We are not going to be 24 hours. I know our zoning application would not permit that anyway. It is not our intention. It is to be a same day operation just like in a doctor's office but more comprehensive. We will also have rehab services there, so if you had knee surgery we will have our stars program for our physical therapy and outpatient therapy also have an office on 27th and Main Street, just down the way a little bit, I mean Fairview. We will have a compliment of our rehab services there too. McCandless: Thank you. Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 54 Anderson: What do you do with your medical waste, how do you dispose of that? Adrauchik: I may actually defer to Darrell Fugood. I did not know I was going to have to talk tonight, but as far as Darrell is our Director of Facility Management, and I would defer to Darrell for that comment, sir. Fugood: My name is Darrell Fugood, and I am Director of Support Services for St. Alphonsus. In regards to medical waste, it is all contracted currently to Stericyle. They bought out BFI here within the last year or so. It is hauled to Salt Lake City to a regional incinerator, and it is incinerated at that point. Anderson: Does it get stored outside in the mean time before they come and pick it up? Fugood: There is a limit on the amount of time you can store regulated medical waste. I think it is something on the order of 48 hours, so there is a staging that will happen with the waste. It needs to be in a secure area, and it is in containers. At the hospital we have a very similar process there. It is a secured fenced area that that wasted is staged in until it is hauled away. Anderson: Is this facility going to be big enough that you are going to have to have liquid oxygen or anything on the sight? Fugood: I think that is going to be driven by the program, actually. My guess is small bottle service is probably more likely in this condition, much like you would see in a physician office space. You might, if we got into some surgery spaces, be forced into so manifold gas systems. You would have to have a pretty good- sized demand to warrant the liquid oxygen tank and operation there. Again, I think that would really be dependent on how the facility develops. Anderson: No other questions. Corrie: Thank you, anything else? Adrauchik: Thank you. I will now defer to Doug Racine to speak to some of the technical aspects on our application. Corrie: Okay, thank you. Racine: My name is Doug Racine. I am with BRS architects, 1010 Elante Place in Boise, Idaho. I understand we are hearing just the rezoned portion now and there were some things that were addressed in a letter and memo that I passed through the City Clerk with a revised plan, and I am not sure if I should address Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 55 that now or not. If you could give me some indication if you would like to hear about that as part of the rezone, or should we wait- Corrie: It is up to you. You can use it now, or you can do it then at this point. Racine: I think I will just move ahead with what I was going to address. We prepared a cover letter from St. Alphonsus that more or less reiterates what Mike just spoke about and attached to that -- I addressed in a memorandum some of the issues that were raised in Planning and Zoning staffs recommended conditions of approvals. In particular, we were emphazing the fact that the bank is a part of the Conditional Use PUD application although we do not have a specific bank on board right now were that configuration to change significantly is defined in staffs conditions. We have realized we have come back for a modification of that Conditional Use Application. There was one item also the nature of the materials and colors involved all would have to be approved by staff with any departure from what we presented here tonight. Also, during the hearing in response to staffs comments, there were a few items you will see in those revised site plans that are part of you packet that we addressed specifically there is a westerly curb cut on Cherry Lane that peraciates these requirements, I needed to offset 150-feet from the street into the subdivision across to the north on Cherry Lane. I have reflected that in the revised site plan, we have added a screened fenced along the southerly property line about the residential Haven Cove properties per staff's recommendations. We have added access through from the 9 parking spaces on the bank parcel, so that they could actually have access to the bank building. We address some of the parking spaces off the driveway from Ten Mile. We eliminated 3 spaces to provide more internal stack per recommendations of our Traffic Engineer. We shifted the traction closure slightly to provide better waste truck access, revised some deciduous trees in the buffer to evergreen. We presented this packet in the revised site plan to staff last week. They have reviewed it, and I believe they do not have any issues. Part of this memo was to clarify hours of operation and what was termed operation, business operations. With specific regard to the rezone, I would like to point out that we reviewed the existing Comprehensive Plan which I believe has this property indicated as existing urban and further in the 2000 draft this property is currently designated for potential commercial development. In seeking the L-O zone on this property, we think it is a less intensive use then a possible commercial use at this property. We specifically oriented the buildings so that the center portion fronting Cherry Lane is a two-story portion, and building C, which is the angled building, is actually a single story structure with the intent that it would have a less impact on the neighbors in terms of privacy and loss of view. As far as traffic on this site there is an ACRD report included in your packets, and I believe it refers to something in the neighborhood of 1580 trips being generated per day from this development. Currently, Cherry Lane has a level of service C which is average or acceptable per my Traffic Engineer a level of service A for reference is free-flowing, no stops, and unlimited lane change. Level of service E at the other end of the spectrum is capacity where it is totally maxed out, so at a ,''~ Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 56 level of service C existing prior to development and then per ACHD's calculations the same level as service C would exist after the development is complete. We have addressed some of the concerns. The neighbors indicated a concern about lighting and making sure that they were not seeing excess light from this site. We have hired an Electric Engineer who has generated a photometric analysis of the site projecting foot-candle levels and selected a light fixture. We would be more than happy to share the information at this time if you are interested. If you would like to see that at this point or prior to that if you have any other questions at this point, I would turn you over to my Electric Engineer, and he could give you a brief explanation of the lighting that we have proposed for this site. Are there any questions specifically of me? Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I had a question on the traffic flow around that bank. I thought I heard you say that you had submitted a revised plan that gave a cut through the nine spaces, where were you talking about? Racine: It was at this point I originally had not given it the full thaw out we had designed nine spaces that apply to the bank. It was brought up during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing that there was really no access for the people using these nine spaces through to the bank other than to come down on the sidewalk and come in this way. I just took out small sections of the berm, 48 inches wide at this location to provide access. Anderson: For pedestrian then, I was thinking that you were talking about vehicle. I guess that is one of things that bothers me about that bank. You have to right in right out turn going in that entryway off of Ten Mile is that correct? Racine: That is correct, right in, right out there. Anderson: So then the bank has to circulate 360 degrees around it and go back out there. I am not sure that is going to be real convenient. It seems like there should be some cut-through to get through to Cherry Lane to the north without coming back out the same entryway. Racine: Oh, I see what you are saying. I think we were trying to separate the hospital traffic from the bank traffic and that was probably the reason we did not provide access through at that point. I really want to emphasize at this point that the bank parcel is shown as very conceptual. We do not have a bank on board yet. I more or less dreamed up that site plan with configuration based on other banks we have done, so it does not represent what in reality will go there. Thus, the nature one of my comments in the memo is that we did not want to hang up the whole development on the concept of the bank. We realize that if we go n Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 57 beyond the square footage or do drastic modifications on the bank as we have shown it; we are going to have come back to this group as a modification. Anderson: I have no other questions. Corrie: Any other questions? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Council? Racine: Would you be interested in the lighting information at this point? Corrie: Sure. Racine: Our Engineer, Wes Smith will come up then and share that will you. Wes Smith: I am Wes Smith with DC Engineering, the Electric Engineer for BRS and the hospital. We put it in you packet in full detail. We showed the foot level and lighting layout before for the area for the parking lot. What we have done is we have broken this out into two plans. One plan indicates an average of 2-foot candle across the parking lot, which is what we design for most facilities. The situation here, down in the left-hand corner of the plan, you will see two diagrams that indicate the throw of the light out of the fixture. We are quite lucky in the last three years lighting manufacturers have developed a reflectant in the fixtures that allows us to delete any light to incroach on neighboring properties like we have over on this side. The top diagram is what we are proposing to use, which has a sharp cutoff. If you look at the foot-candle level around the neighboring properties along the berm, the highest foot-candle level that we are on the buffer zone is .1-foot candle, even though we have a 2-foot candle average out here for patients entering and exiting the hospital. The City of Meridian only allows the lighting to remain at this level until 11 p.m. They have a deal in place now that we can only leave it on until 11 p.m., so the second plan shows what we consider the security lighting. From 10:30 p.m. until 6:30 a.m. We also put a dusk control on here so that if daylight came earlier than 6:30 a.m. there would not be a need for these lights to be on, so we would maintain it to were they were off. Now this foot-candle level is just for security purpose only, and it only lights the parking lot to .5-foot candle to maintain security. If you look at the buffer zone now, the lighting levels are zero. The fixture that we are proposing to use is a horizontal lamp, so it allows for minimal glare out of the fixture. The glare portion that you will see in most parking lots comes off the end of the fixture, and this fixture actually caps that and the reflectors are built to allow for minimal glare out of the fixture. Any questions? Bird: I have none. Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 58 De Weerd: No, thank you. Corrie: Does that conclude yours for right now? This is a Public Hearing, anyone from the public who would like to enter testimony in favor at this point? Those opposed? Lingel: I am Dwayne Lingel, 2153 Turnberry Way. First of all, I want to thank you for this opportunity to speak, and I did write the letter that you have before you. I did not mean for that to be offensive. It is strong language, but I felt there were some serious problems with the meeting that took place in January. I have talked about that particular instance, I do not know if you want to address that here at this time or later in private. Corrie: You have the floor. Lingel: Okay, I really do feel that the Planning and Zoning meeting in particular was not well run and at that meeting the only discussion that was brought forward was about the parking at the bank. I felt that at the first meeting regarding this issue that we as citizens would have or should have had more information without having to come up with information from our minds about what they were proposing. They really did not propose anything that night they showed the same pictures that you are seeing, but did not propose in the detail that we got here tonight. Without our inquiry, there really would not have been any information shared. I find it also interesting that at the time of that meeting that they would pass this onto you as acceptable without knowing how many doctors were going to be performing any kind of procedures or what they were going to be doing within the building. I do not think, in my opinion, you can have an understanding of what is being proposed without knowing what is going on inside the building by the people and in regard to that they just made reference to 1580 inflow of traffic into this area. That is a lot of people, in my opinion, for who we are at Ten Mile and Cherry Lane. We moved out there five or six years ago into an area that was quiet, and my wife drives 20 miles to get to work, so we do not have to deal with the traffic. We would rather live in a lower traffic area which is what we have had in the past, but would change with this proposal. I think that one of the factors you have to consider is this not traffic from our area, this is traffic that will come from Star, Kuna, or Caldwell, Eagle it really could come from any direction. I know we have already had some of our family who live in Star, work in Meridian and sure it would be convenient, but they would never come to our area for this type of service if it were not there. They would not be in our area outside of an occasional visit to us. That is an issue for me and probably one of the biggest. The other issue, which I wrote about, is the fact that this was a R-4 zoning. You have changed the zoning here from homes and houses to another purpose. I understand that your Comprehensive Plan is talking about a commercial zoning here, but that is not fact the case of what it was when we bought our property. I do not like the fact that now all of sudden we live in a commercial zoned area which is not what Ten Mile and Cherry Lane is about. I i'`~ Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 59 really think you need to consider the impact of a rezone from something that will draw from various parts of our county, changing that from a R-4 to this type of zone. The next thing I would to say is that in the paper this Sunday there was an article, and I do not know if you have read it, but it talks about the growth of Meridian. It really speaks about what looks like to be the lack of management regarding the growth. In this article, I am going to quote, it was actually by Mayor Corrie, says that he is confident Meridian residents will do what is best for the town, because most of them fled from somewhere else. They are talking about the small town feel. It says, that you really want to keep the small town feel of Meridian, and that is what you are quoted here as saying. I do not feel that this proposal would come close to meeting that kind of a comment, and I really think it is going to impact us very negatively. I will take any questions. Corrie: Where do you live in relationship to this property? Lingel: I am around the corner in Cherry Lane golf course to the west. Corrie: Are you aware of the possibility of an interchange going in at Ten Mile and I-84? Lingel: I have been made aware of that. Corrie: Okay, and are you aware that Ten Mile will eventually be a five-lane road north and south? Lingel: I have not been aware of that. Corrie: That is an ACHD in their plans for all north south- Lingel: When did that change? Corrie: That never did change. It has always been ACHD's planning for five lanes. I just wanted to check and see if you were aware of that and also the state is looking at Highway 16 that comes from Emmett down to make some kind of connection to I-84 at the interchange if it happens at that point. That is all "ifs" now, but if that happens that is going to be a lot of traffic whether you have this there or not, so I just want to make sure that you understand that and that the demographics that is possibly going to happen to Meridian in the next 25 years. Our small town is going to be about 80,000 people. While I would enjoy a small town atmosphere, I do not know whether the citizens will feel the same way that I do at that point, but we will find out. I just want to make sure that you had some of that information with you if you had not seen it before. Lingel: That is good to know. I do not know that I feel any different. ~"~ Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 60 Corrie: Okay, I did not want you to make any changes. It was just for informational purposes, because I live out there where you do. Questions Council? Bird: I have none. Lingel: Thank you. Corrie: Thank you, Dwayne. Anyone else in the public? Hansen: My name is Penny Hansen, and I live 2869 West Ann which is in the Sunburst Subdivision right across the street from the proposed site. My house is right there, the third one down. I had no idea Ten Mile Road was going to have five lanes either. I knew an interchange was coming in not too far down the road. I do not understand why the City plans things like this in a residential area. I have lived there for nine years. I have lived in the Meridian area all of my life, which I am not starting to like very much now. I do not understand either why you do not improve some of the traffic congestion-- *** End of Side Four *** Hansen: -- in the morning and afternoons. They are really bad traffic hazards, and this is not going to improve it at all. This is going to make it really bad like on Ten Mile Road and Franklin and down by the high school, another 4-way stop. There are no traffic lights coming in or anything, but we have all of this extra traffic flow. Is there going to be any fixes to that in the future? Corrie: I can tell you that Ten Mile Road and Franklin that will be five lanes north, south, east and west. There will probably be a signal there, but the ACHD is ready to do the surveying now. Franklin will be a five lane all the way to Garrity and it will be all the way into Boise five lanes. Then your north south mile lines will be five lane roads eventually as Fairview is at this present time. Hansen: Yes, because there used to be two lanes in front of my house and now there is four. Corrie: I know I used to live there. Thank God, it is not two lanes there now. That is were it is going. Hansen: I do not like it either, but I guess there is not much I can do about it. Corrie: That is what we are here to hear. Thank you, anyone else? Kindall: Hi, my name is Brian Kindall. I live at 3840 Woodmont Drive which is Cherry Lane Golf Course and I guess a really touchy point for me along with just the growth of Meridian. I am concerned about the school children. I still have a Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 61 small boy, and at one time we had heard depending on where the kids lived, the two schools were an option. Some kids have to cross Cherry Lane over here, so there were crosswalks and there was the nice crosswalk lady that stand there and guarantee that the kids will be safe. I still do not go to bed at night thinking that is all together true. I am concerned about this new facility reflecting on that. The school children, there was talk of a footbridge, sky bridge, over Cherry Lane at one time. I wonder if talk like that is still hot to go, or if that has been set aside. am just curious about the safety of the kids. Speed limit changes, things like that that might reflect on the little people. Has there been more talk about the safety of the Sky Bridge, walking across the road type thing? Corrie: I have not heard anything just a good rumor. Okay, thank you. Anyone else? Morrison: My name is Robert Morrison, 3841 Woodmont Drive, Cherry Lane Golf Course Subdivision. I also own property over in the Sunburst area. When the people bought all the way around this property it was zoned for R-4. We all realize there is going to be growth in Meridian. There has been a tremendous amount of growth, but when the people were offered this property it was all for residential. If you look around the edge of that, they spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to buy their homes there to be developed into a commercial or business section when you can go down Ten Mile Road where you have already put in storage units. You have taken out a dairy, and you have a lot of room out there that Planning and Zoning has not approved for tracks to be in there yet which they approved for residential tracks here and then people have to put up with something like this. There is nothing wrong with it, if it is in the right location but it can be moved either a half of a mile to the south even on Ten Mile Road. They will be out of the tracks, and then Planning and Zoning do not have to put a track next to it if they do not want to. Or if people buy next to it by then, that is their business, but this was already zoned for R-4. To sell all of these people hundreds of thousands of dollars of property around it, and then have them pop up with something like this, I do not think it is right. We all know there is going to be growth, in this whole area there is going to be growth, but hopefully, it will be 15 to 20 years from now, but if it is not so be it. You should not be putting something like this right next to a property that was already sold to people for R-4 zoning with the property next to them zoned R-4. It is just a matter of Planning and Zoning. They have not done their job. If they wanted to make that commercial, then why did they okay it for tracks and houses? So the Planning and Zoning and the City Council over the period of years have it themselves. Why keep on continuing to do it and hurting people all the way around the area for something that R-4 zoned to start with? Like I said, it is just a matter of conscience, evidentially because there is nothing wrong with St. Alphonsus set up. More power to them if they can come out here, but I think it should be moved to an area where there is not housing tracks already existing which the Planning and Zoning okayed and the City Council and the Mayor all okayed over the period of years then have this thrown in on top of them. The Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 62 lights are not going to bother me from that place because I Corrie, but I still do not think it is right for those people or the the Sunburst area to be hampered with something like this and goes on when it is already zoned R-4 and should be residential live over by Bob property I own in the traffic. What area in Meridian, which is a very nice area and should remain a very nice area without your commercial and business zoning after it is already R-4 and people have bought around it. Thank you ladies and aentlemen Corrie: Thank you Bob, anyone else? Lingel: I think one of the things that I would like to add is at the Planning and Zoning meeting there was a threat about the fact that we could either accept this or they could find something that would be worse to put in there. We certainly do not want something worse. We are not looking for trouble, but we are looking for the right thing, and I hope we can have your word and your honor about bringing something if this is denied that is not going to negatively impact us. This is Planning and Zoning that gave the threat, I took it as a threat. It was spoken not friendly and I really believe them, I really truly believe they are capable of putting something much worse than this in and it shows in our City. I hope you guys will watch out for us because we have given you this responsibility, hopefully, to protect us in some ways and to work with us. Bird: Just a second, I have a question for him. What do recommend should be put in there, R-4 houses? Lingel: I really think if that is what it was zoned for, I believe that portion should be houses. Bird: We just turned down a subdivision to the north of it because it was an R-4. That is not a location where you are going to build half million-dollar houses. You do not have the view. That is one thing Meridian does not have any place in their city. We are not the Eagles or the Highlands or anything like that. So what would you recommend? We can move the thing down, like Bob said, a mile, mile and a half so everybody coming to it can drive through my subdivision to get there. Boise, we can all drive to Boise down Fairview, which is very, very crowded. What would you think would go in there besides houses at that location? And do you think R-4 houses at that property are not going to really impact the traffic? What is it going to do to schools an R-4 housing compared to what this is, the schools; Chaparral is already crowded. You guys think it should just be housing, I am just asking. Lingel: In my opinion yes, I think that has been the consensus of the people who have spoken. Brian brought up the thought of some kind of Skate Park I mean I do not know. I am sure we can dream and figure out something if you cannot put houses in there. I wouldn't be opposed to it if were not such alarge - 25 doctors, I personally need medical care. I am a candidate for that type of a project, but at Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 63 the same time I do not believe it would be right for who were/are out there as I see it. That is just my opinion. Bird: Thank you, Dwayne, I did not mean to debate with you. Corrie: Thank you, anyone else? Durant: My name is Dennis Durant. I reside at 8352 South Old Farm Place, Meridian, Idaho. Originally, I was not going to say anything, but I am actually in favor of this application. I look at Albertson's across, and they generate much more traffic than I see the facility actually would. I can see it benefit my family. I think it is a great asset to the community. I think we all need medical services at some point in our lives, and I think it is really selfish on the part of people that live in that block to say it is not right to have that facility for other people. That is just what I wanted to say, I think that St. Alphonsus does a great service for us, and I think we need to appreciate that. I think that they have the ability to -they are taking a big risk by investing in our community, thinking that the project will work. They have already expended a lot of money. Even in just in all these architectural plans that they have put forth just to do this project. So I think it is a good idea. I know everybody has concerns, but we all have concerns about everything until we get used to it. I see Albertson's as an eye sore to me and with all the engineering they are doing with the lighting, I think that they are trying to do a very minimal impact for the neighbors. I am sure there will be privacy fencing for those people who border the property. To me, if I were living in that property bordering it I would not mind that one bit. I would much rather have a parking lot that was quiet at night, than the neighbors in the back yard next to me having a barbecue until midnight. That would be much more favorable for me, I would just like to leave those comments with you. Corrie: Thank you, Dennis. Anyone else? Okay, developer do you have anything to add questions that have come up that you want to address? Adrauchik: Just one to really capture why we want to be out there. I really appreciate that some of the neighbors out in that area would rather see St. Alphonsus, although a valued entity, perhaps off the beaten path to access it's service. St. Alphonsus' goal truly is to grow with Meridian. We recognize the need to be sensitive to the surrounding neighborhoods, but we really want to develop a medical community that is less intensive than a hospital, but can compliment the integrity of their neighborhood. Fundamentally, we may have some disagreements with some of the neighbors on growing with their community, but that is our glow, to appropriately grow with their community. We feel that what we have proposed this evening represents that desire, not just for today but for the long-term future of how health care is provided conveniently close to their homes. Corrie: Thank you, Council any questions about the Public Hearing? Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 64 De Weerd: I had one for staff, but there is not anyone over there. Well maybe the applicant can answer it. The pad where the bank is supposed to go, if the use is different, are you coming back or as long as it is compatible, what are the plans for that piece? Adrauchik: We are in final negotiations with a bank, actually to pursue the purchase of that parcel. If that bank chose not to pursue that what St. Alphonsus would do, we would grate that lot, seed it, irrigate it, and maintain it until a future opportunity may present itself. St. Alphonsus, there is nothing pushing us to have to sell that lot to a bank. We feel it is a nice compliment, but if that bank choose to back out and another one was not going to meet our needs then St. Alphonsus would, like we do with a lot of our land, -- like in Caldwell, we purchased 20 acres, but we will not develop until it is a win-win for our sight. De Weerd: But you will maintain that, then? Adrauchik: We would, we grate it, maintain it, and St.Alphonsus' mission is to have a warm healing environment. Part of our initiative for our sights, so we would make sure that the site would be maintained, it would be grated, it would be mowed for that lot, and we would support that venture, so it would not be an eye sore. I do not think that anything St. Alphonsus does is an eye sore, and we would not do that in Meridian either. Good question, thank you. Corrie: Thank you, any other questions? Anderson: I have none. Bird: I have none. Corrie: Hearing none, I will entertain a motion to close the Public Hearing. Anderson: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to close the Public Hearing on Item 13, request for rezone. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Discussion of the Council? McCandless: Mr. Mayor. Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 65 Corrie: Mrs. McCandless. McCandless: I have listened to all of the testimony. In some cases I can understand why some of the people feel as they do, but on that corner, on one corner you have a doctor's office, you have three churches, one across the street and two behind and you have Albertson's. You have a pizza place and you have a mail place and the tanning place. I can think of a lot of things that possibly would be a lot more disturbing than what they have here. Knowing St. Alphonsus they maintain their property well, it looks like they have some really nice buildings in there, and I just do not see the objections in that particular area as being legitimate. I think they would cooperate with the neighbors. They certainly talked about their lighting and will try to keep it down so that it does not disturb anyone. I do not live too far from there myself so I do not think it is going to be anything but a good addition to our community. We cannot stop growth. It is going to keep growing. Talking about Ten Mile Road being five lanes and talking about all the traffic on Franklin that is terrible, it is. We are fighting with the ACRD all the time to get these roads fixed, but if we get an interchange on Ten Mile Road that is certainly going to benefit the people that live in that area that have to go downtown to Boise or even to Nampa. They can get out there without having to go through town to get out. I, for one, will probably vote for it. Corrie: Any other discussion? De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: I appreciate citizens' comments and having been on the other side of the podium I know exactly where you are coming from and appreciate your concerns. I think before when the growth began, there has been a lot of new things that have come out in planning in trying to design your community to serve the whole community, and bringing services closer to where your people live is a good thing. I think that my kids also cross those streets when they want to ride their scooters to school, they also do that, and it is a concern. That is why the School District busses kids that are even within ahalf-mile of those schools, but we cannot change the placement of that school. It is one of the reasons we got the light on Lauderhill, so it would be a safer place for those kids to cross the street. Traffic is going to be there whether it is residential or commercial in some form or another, and it will probably be more because more people will have to be driving to those services that they need. Because of the configuration of the street and the plans for these that were done long before any of us ever dreamed of having a house in those empty fields. Those streets were designated for high use, and right now Cherry Lane moves considerable. As you can see the impact of even this development does not change that service level, so that just shows you the kind of impact that those streets are made to handle. I believe in urban planning, urban planning is bringing services closer to the residents and in ~'~, Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 66 corners like that it is a logical place to do that. I think that another point was raised that it is not going to impact our schools like a residential area would and I think until another elementary school is built that is one thing that we do not have to worry about. I think it is a good use, it is a better use than a commercial use which would be a higher traffic level, and it is attractive and it looks like St. Alphonsus has done their homework right by meeting with the neighbors that back up to that site. We do not see any of them here, and so their communication with those neighbors must be well otherwise you can bet that they would be here. Corrie: Any comments, discussion? Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I just wanted to offer too that this is exactly the kind of development that everybody asks for with these empty pieces of ground that are along Cherry Lane. We had another project that was down at Ten Mile Road and Pine, and this is the type of project the people wanted there. We just turned down a project earlier tonight, or delayed an action on that, that is a mile and a half down the road because it was a super store going in that type of a lot. What everybody is asking for is a professional type of office building. I really think that when you look at it, 1500 vehicle trips sounds like a lot, but in comparison when you say we approved a daycare tonight, that daycare alone is 115 vehicle trips, so really in the perspective of other commercial things that could go in there, this is very low. I guarantee Albertson's puts a lot more trips than 1500 vehicle trips a day. I live in this area. I live over in Parkside Creek, and I personally like the fact that we have an Albertson's there. I like just walking over to the grocery store or zipping in the car and being at the grocery store and not having to drive downtown or 2 or 3 miles to get to a grocery store. Like Tammy talked about, the idea is to bring some of those commercial retail uses that we use every day, bring them into your neighborhood so you are not always driving across town and that saves a lot of the fuel, saves a lot of these roads that have to be build. If you can put more of the uses in the areas where the people are living, I think this is a good quality project. I do not believe that it is going to impact the neighborhood significantly. I live there why would I want to devalue my own property? Everyone gripes and complains that we should wait until we can build a road. We have afive-lane artillery road leading into this property. We do not get this very often I think this is a right project and a right time, and I think it is a good thing. Corrie: Any further comments? Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Meridian City Council Meeting February 20, 2001 Pg. 67 Bird: I will give my pennies' worth. I, too, agree with them and regardless that this is not aslam-dunk deal, we have thought hard and long on it. I believe for that corner that this is probably the most practical application we could have. I believe that our traffic count would be higher if we put that 25 acres into an R-4 with houses in there. I too would like to see our neighborhoods get more of our own services to them. The Urban Planning, it saves traffic congestion throughout the rest of the City, so I think this is a very nice thing for the City of Meridian and this area. Corrie: Okay, with that being said I will entertain a motion on the request for the rezone. De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: I move that we approve the rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for the proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical center on Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road to include all staff comments and testimony to ask the Attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision of Order. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the request for rezone of the St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center for the Attorney to draw up the proper order and the staff comments to be included. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote please. Roll-call: De Weerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye. Corrie: All ayes, motion is approved for the rezoning. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 14. Public Hearing: CUP 00-056 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a planned-unit development in a proposed L-O zone for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center by BRS Architects -southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road Corrie: At this point, I will open the Public Hearing and staff comments and any addition comments. Stiles: I do not have too much to add on the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant and the testimony have reflected pretty much the site plan that has ,... ,..~ RECOROEO - REOl1ES ,, DA5 FEE,~.DEPlIi'Y 2uQ? ~,U ~ 9 ~rf ~~ i 3 r ~ 3o2o9ai27 P~IE1~1G;r.N CITY CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE N0.02- ~ / D AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT SAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER IS THE OWNER OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND HAS MADE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR REZONE OF THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR REAL PROPERTY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TEN MILE ROAD AND CHERRY LANE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO, THAT LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN FROM R-4 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) ZONING DISTRICT TO L-O (LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT) AS DEFINED UNDER MERIDIAN CITY CODE § 11-7-2 G, REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID REZONING DESIGNATION TO THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. FINDINGS: 1. The owner of the following described property has made a written request for a re-zone of the zoning classification for the subject Real Property herein described from R-4 (Low Density Residential) District to L-O (Limited Office) District as defined under Meridian City Code § 11-7-2 G; and 2. The City of Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council having given notice and conducted all public hearings in accordance with law and having issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law and Decision and Order granting the application for rezone; and ST. AL'S / (L-O) RZ-00-010 / RE-ZONE ORDINANCE - 1 The real property which is the subject of this ordinance is legally described as follows: A parcel of land located in Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11 of Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho from which point the North 1/4 corner of said Section 11 bears South 89°03'40" East a distance of 2653.23 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West along the westerly boundary line of said Section 11 a distance of 300.00 feet; thence leaving said Section line South 89°03'40" East a distance of 45.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°03'40" East a distance of 681.14 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West a distance of 274.92 feet; thence South 89°20'00" East a distance of 416.35 feet; thence North 00°00'00" East a distance of 522.38 feet to a point on the southerly right-of--way line of Cherry Lane; thence along said southerly right-of- way line, North 89°07'31" West a distance of 1067.02 feet; thence South 44°30'45" West a distance of 43.47 feet to a point on the easterly right-of--way line of Ten Mile Road; thence along said easterly right-of--way line South 00°00'00" West a distance of 216.74 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 386,613 square feet or 8.88 acres more or less. 4. The following conditions shall be required as follows to-wit: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 4.1 The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 4.2 The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: a. The bank parcel, as configured, has been shown for conceptual approval within the context of the proposed rezone. If there are significant modifications, as determined by staff, at the time a specific bank and site configuration are determined, such modifications shall require application for a modification of the current CUP/PUD application. As a modification, the bank parcel shall be reviewed on its own merit and either approved or ST. AL'S / (L-O) RZ-00-010 / RE-ZONE ORDINANCE - 2 ~ ~-~, denied without jeopardizing or compromising the approval of the current CUP/PUD application for Saint Alphonsus Medical Office Building. Significant modifications shall include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. Additionally, in the event a bank project does not materialize, then applicant shall be allowed to develop any other principally allowed L-O use on that parcel, subject to stars review and approval. If the nature of such a development were determined by staff to exceed the conceptual intent of the current CUP/PUD, then that change would also be require a modification as noted above. To clarify, any such modification shall be reviewed on its own merit. To clarify, the bank parcel is conceptual at this point. Any future development or action on this parcel is intended to be independent of the current application and approvals, specifically the ambulatory care/medical office building portion. The bank parcel, in no way, shall jeopardize the ability to proceed with the balance of the development. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. The material color palette presented are conceptual at this time. Applicant has freedom to modify colors in the future, subject to staff's review. c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. Applicant has updated the Master Site Development Plan providing an access point through the landscape berm along the east property line of the bank parcel to allow more direct access from these (9) parking stalls to the bank. 4.3 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 4.4 Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance 11-13 for use of undeveloped lots. ST. AL'S / (L-O) RZ-00-010 / RE-ZONE ORDINANCE - 3 4.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 4.6 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street pazking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on- site. 4.7 All signage shall be in accordance with the standazds set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 4.8 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 4.9 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 4.10 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop baz at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 4.11 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right-in/right-out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40- feet to accommodate the on-site median. ST. AL'S / (L-O) RZ-00-010 / RE-ZONE ORDINANCE - 4 4.12 Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The eastern most driveway on Cherry Lane shall be shifted approximately 60 feet to the east to accommodate this policy. The revised Master Site Development Plan reflects this change. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. 4.13 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. 4.14 Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. 4.15 Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 4.16 Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACRD Construction Services staff. 4.17 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five yeazs old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 4.18 Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or pazcel access to Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane is prohibited. Adopt the additional action of the Council from their February 20, 2001, meeting by incorporating the Applicant's letter of 02/12/01 as follows: 4.19 Pertaining to the site lighting, the applicant shall comply with the ordinance requirements, and specifically, the site lighting shall be designed so that light does not directly reflect or spill over into adjacent residential districts, that the site lighting arrangement shall be approved by the City Engineer and that applicant ST. AL'S / (L-O) RZ-00-010 / RE-ZONE ORDINANCE - 5 comply with the listed site lighting standards. A Conceptual Site Lighting Plan has been submitted to show the proposed site lighting arrangement, light levels and fixture types, and is on file with the City Clerk's office. 4.20 The "Hours of Business Operation" shall be defined as "Hours during which the facility is actually open for business and patients are on the premises being seen or treated." Additionally, to clarify facility maintenance, before or after hours staff preparation or other similar activities occurring when the facility is not open for business are not subject to "Hours of Business Operation" restrictions. SECTION 2. That the above-described Property be, and the same is hereby re-zoned and designed (L-O) Limited Office District. SECTION 3. That the City Engineer is hereby direct to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps depicting the City of Meridian land use zones in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 4: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. ~~ PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ,day of ~ , 2002. ST. AL'S / (L-O) RZ-00-010 / RE-ZONE ORDINANCE - 6 ~•~i APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ~~ day of t ~ , 2002. 50-902 Yes: Second Reading: `- Third Reading: STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada. ) No: On this ~ day of /'~(~- u-~ ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeazed ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. ~.O ~'~''~ O .~; • ,~ (SEAL) ; o • `. ;sT.~t .~~ •.~ msg~Z:~work~lMMeridian~Ivleridian ^ 0 0 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: ,(~ ~~, ~,-~~ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:~~~S RZO l OCUP056~RZOrdinance ST. AL'S / (L-O) RZ-00-010 / RE-ZONE ORDINANCE - 7 ^, .-. ..o .w..N 1 N o ~~' ~ I ~ AYN WOl ~ N O ~ ~ ~ ~.A (~ 7 L ~ Z M 'y ~~ ~ UL ~ ~~o ~ ~ icy Z ~ r Q O ~ ~ s ylI~NIE NT~M Z w Q CI~ 'S7 ~ Q - ~ 3 W u ~p N w~ Q ~ ~ O U ~ ; ~ ~ ~ yy~~~ 3AN1®OflJS N ~ 6 ~ Z AMI NNNp 1ry11M Qk S ~ m ~ r' ; 3 3 S~ ~Y~107 M3~M1 N ssG 6 - _ _ _. _ ~ -:._... 31Y Q1H1411 N ~(y~. AL ZZS ~ ~ _ - - _ _ 3Q0.00.OON _ _ 3 $ w - g ~ ~ 39Y9NB N G ~ _ -._ 3~Y N c0 ° ~ ~ 9RN ~ ~ 3W YNYDN .. _..._ . .Z6'gLZ ~ ~ - w a ~ o MOO.OO.OOS ~ 3M1Y MDL'IY M o (('per~ ~ O _ __ ~ ~ ~ z w ~~' ~ - ; C~ - ~"~ ~ ~ z ° ~ pz _ _ ~ m co ~- z z ~ ~ 3WNOSNIYKSN v ~ ~ _ a m ' .tiL 9lZ _ 02131IW N31 m M100A0.00S _. ___ _ _ _ - ~,- 0 _ _ _ m ~~. AVM -._. ~ - ~' - _ - - -...` - - z ~ _ c~ _. _... J a i - - ~ A1~17~ 711071 - W U b)~~N 7l~Tg1 71Yp p _ - 6 b~~ X .. M - a M,~ t>~ N ff ; ~~ _ _ .WAY - ~Ar~ ~'ap,yy~ .. 'N ~ ~ G . may - 4y FS !K W ~ - -. L~IDNeN1.17N li)~ ' .. _.. YaM11M- ¢~ 7A ~ z E rte, CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To: The Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor of Ada County, and The State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk, of the City of Meridian, Ada County, State of Idaho, do hereby certify that the attached copy of Ordinance No. D2;-~7J passed by the City Council of the City of Meridian, on the ~~ day of ~}L~-GJ1L.~~ 2~%~' ~, is a true and correct copy of the original of said document which is in-the - care, custody and control q~,,~he~IC}~,~ Clerk of the City of Meridian. ~ ' ~~ ~ = s~~~ - .~ o~ W~.LIA.NI G. BERG, JR. ,,~ , ,9 ~Q.\1``~. STATE OF IDAHO, ~~~''~,),~~,,~Y,,,~~~`~ ss. County of Ada, On this ~ day of ' G~C~'f" , in the year ZC~pZ ,before me, .• °• ~ N 511!. (SEAL) ~ ~ Notary Public for Idaho ~, ~,.~~1G; p;• Commission Expires: --Z ~ ~S' ••:~'oF~.•' •...... msg\Z:\Worl<\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\StAls RZOIOCUP056\CertificationOfClerkRZOrd __ GL(}`~L , Y1~-<-~~ , a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known or identified to me to be the City Cleric of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. ~.... CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN - 1 RZ-00-006 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN C/C 02-20-01 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR REZONE OF APPROXIMATELY 8.88 ACRES FOR PROPOSED AMBULATORY CARE CENTER, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TEN MILE ROAD AND CHERRY LANE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO Case No: RZ-00-010 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR REZONE ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, APPLICANT The above entitled matter on the rezoning application of 8.88 acres having come on for public hearing on February 20, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m., and Council having received the report of Brad Hawkins-Clark, Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department and Bruce Frecldeton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant were Mike Ondracek, Darrell Fugate, Doug Racine and Wes Smith, and appearing in favor of the application was Dennis Durant, and those appearing in opposition, with comments and/or concerns were Ihvayne Lingel, Penny Hanson, Brian ICindell, and Robert Morrision, and the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-0I O) -I Council having received the record of this matter made before the Planning and Zoning Commission, and having received their Recommendation to the City Council, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order: FINDINGS QF FACT The notice of public hearing on the application for rezoning was published For two (2) consecutive weeks prior to said public hearing scheduled for February 20, 2001, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen {15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the February 20, 2001, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010} -2 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-I5-5 and 11-16-1. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and development ordinances codified at Meridian City Code Title I I and Title I2, and all current zoning maps thereof, and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629 --- January 4, 1994, and maps and the ordinance Establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 4. The property is approximately 8.88 acres in size. The property is generally located at the southeast corner of Ten Mile Road and Cherry Lane, Meridian, Idaho, and is described as follows: A parcel of land located in Section 11, Township 3 North, Range West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11 of .Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho from which point the North 1/4 corner of said Section I 1 bears South 89°03'40" East a distance of 2653.23 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West along the westerly boundary line of said Section 11 a distance of 300.00 feet; thence leaving said Section line South 89°03'40" East a distance of 45.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°03'40" East a distance of 6$1.14 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West a distance of 274.92 feet; thence South 89°20'00" East a distance of 416.35 feet; thence North 00°00'00" East a distance of 522.38 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way line of Cherry Lane; thence along said southerly right-of-way line, North 89°07'31" West a distance of 1067.02 feet; thence South 44°30'45" West a distance of 43.47 feet to a point on the easterly right-of--way line of Ten Mile Road; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -3 thence along said easterly right-of--way line South 00°00'00" West a distance of 216.74 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 386,613 square feet or 8.8$ acres more or less. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise, Idaho. 6. The Applicant is owner of record. 7. The property is presently zoned as R-4, and is fallow agricultural. 8. The Applicant requests the property be rezoned to L-O. 9. The proposed site is surrounded by a church and residential subdivision to the north, a church and residential subdivision to the south, a residential subdivision to the east and retail uses to the west. I0. The subject property is within city limits of the City of Meridian. 11. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 12. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: construction of an ambulatory care center. 13. The Applicant's requested rezoning of the subject real property as L-O is consistent with the commercial designation on the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Existing Urban. 14. There axe no significant or scenic features of major importance FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-oI0) _ ~ that affect the consideration of this application. I5. In review of the application for rezone it is provided at Meridian City Code § 11-15-1 lfor the General Standards that the Commission and Council review this proposed zoning amendment and pursuant to the criteria of said section finds that: 15.1 The new zoning will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan; I5.2 The area included in the zoning amendment is not intended to be rezoned in the future; 15.3 The proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area, subject to the conditions of the conditional use process; 15.4 The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses, subject to the conditions of the conditional use pxocess; 15.5 The area will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; 15.6 The use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; 15.7 The use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-OIO) -5 excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; 15.8 The area will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to cxeate an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; I5.9 The use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and 15.10 The proposed zoning will be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15.2 Staff conditions provide as follows: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 15.2.1 The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 15.2.2 The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: a. The bank parcel, as configured, has been shown fox conceptual approval `within the context of the proposed rezone. If there are significant modifications, as determined by staff, at the time a specific bank and site configuration are determined, such modifications shall require application for a modification of the current CUP/PUD application. As a modification, the bank parcel shall be reviewed on its own merit and either approved or denied without jeopardizing or compromising the approval of the current CUP/PUD application for Saint Alphonsus Medical Office Building. Significant modifications shall include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-O10) -b n Additionally, in the event a bank project does not materialize, then applicant shall be allowed to develop any other principally allowed L-O use on that parcel, subject to staff's review and approval. If the nature of such a development were determined by staff to exceed the conceptual intent of the current CUP/PUD, then that change would also be require a modification as noted above. To clarify, any such modification shall be reviewed on its own merit. To clarify, the bank parcel is conceptual at this point. Any future development or action on this parcel is intended to be independent of the current application and approvals, specifically the ambulatory care/medical office building portion. The bank parcel, in no way, shall jeopardize the ability to proceed with the balance of the development. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. The material color palette presented are conceptual at this time. Applicant has freedom to modify colors in the future, subject to staff's review. c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. Applicant has updated the Master Site Development Plan providing an access paint through the landscape berm along the east property line of the bank parcel to allow more direct access from these (9) parking stalls to the bank. I5.2.3Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-I-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 15.2.40ff street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance I 1-13 for use of undeveloped lots. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) -7 n ~-. 15.2.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections I 1-I3-4.C. and 12-S-2.M. 15.2.6A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-9I) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 15.2.7A11 signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section I I -14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 15.2.8 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section I2-5-2.I~. 15.2.9A11 construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 15.2. l OConstruct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct a six-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 15.2.11 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-inlright-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the drive~cvay to right-in/right-out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -8 for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to accommodate the on- site median. 15.2.12Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The eastern most driveway on Cherry Lane shall be shifted approximately 60 feet to the east to accommodate this policy. The revised Master Site Development Plan reflects this change. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4- feet wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. 15.2.13Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. 15.2.14Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. 15.2.15Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 15.2.16Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACHD Construction Services staff. 15.2.17Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 15.2.184ther than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -9 Cherry Lane is prohibited. Adopt the additional action of the Council from their February 20, 2001, meeting by incorporating the Applicant's letter of 02/I2/O1 as follows: I5.2. I9Pertaining to the site lighting, the applicant shall comply with the ordinance requirements, and specifically, the site lighting shall be designed so that light does not directly reflect or spill over into adjacent residential districts, that the site lighting arrangement shall be approved by the City Engineer and that applicant comply with the listed site lighting standards. A Conceptual Site Lighting Plan has been submitted to show the proposed site lighting arrangement, light levels and fixture types, and is on file with the City Clerk's office. 15.2.20The "Hours of Business Operation" shall be defined as "Hours during which the facility is actually open for business and patients are on the premises being seen or treated." Additionally, to clarify facility maintenance, before or after hours staff preparation or other similar activities occurring when the facility is not open for business are not subject to "Hours of Business Operation" restrictions. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The Council may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 2. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by "Local Land Use Planiung Act of 1975", codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by the adoption of Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. No. 629, January 4, 1994. 3. The requested zoning of Limited Office District, (L-O) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-7-2 G as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -IO ~L-O) Limited O, ce Distriict: The purpose of the L-O District is to permit the establishment of groupings of professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic, public service and similar uses. Research uses shall not involve heavy testing operations of any kind or product manufacturing of such a nature to create noise, vibration or emissions of a nature offensive to the overall purpose of this District. The L-O District is designed to act as a buffer between other more intense nonresidential uses and high density residential uses, and is thus a transitional use. Connection to the Municipal water and sewer system of the City is a requirement in this District. 4. Idaho Code § 67-6511 provides and requires that the City shall establish by ordinance one or more zones or zoning districts in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the ordinance establishing zoning districts can be amended with particular consideration given to the effects of any proposed zone change upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services, including school districts, within the City's planning jurisdiction and that it is in conformance vvith the Comprehensive Plan. 5. Idaho Code § b7-b51 IA provides: Each governing board may, by ordinance adopted or amended in accordance with the notice and hearing provisions provided under section 67-6509, Idaho Code, require or permit as a condition of rezoning that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject parcel. The governing board shall adopt ordinance provisions governing the creation, form, recording, modification, enforcement and termination of conditional commitments. 6. The City of Meridian by the adoption of Meridian City Code § 1 I-15-I2 has exercised its authority to require or permit as a condition of rezoning FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-O1o) -11 that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject property. 7. § 11-6-1 ZONING DISTRICT MAP provides in part as follows: The districts established in this Ordinance as shown on the Official Zoning Map, together with all explanatory matter thereon, are hereby adopted as part of this Ordinance. Where uncertainty exists with respect to the boundaries of any of the zarling districts as shown on the Official Zoning Map, the following shall apply: 7.1 Where district boundaries axe indicated as approximately following the centerline of street lines, highway right-of- way lines, streams, lakes or other bodies of water, the centerline shall be construed to be such boundary; 7.2 Where district boundaries are so indicated that they approximately follow the lot lines, such lot lines shall be construed to be said boundaries; 7.3 Where district boundaries are so indicated that they are approximately parallel to the centerlines or street lines of streets, or the centerlines or right-of-way lines of highways, such district boundaries shall be construed as being parallel thereto and at such distance therefrom as indicated on the Official Zoning Map. If no distance is given, such dimensions shall be determined by the use of the scale shown on the Official Zoning Map; and 7.4 Where the boundary of a district follows a railroad line, such boundary shall be deemed to be located in the middle of the main tracks of said railroad line. S. § I 1-15-11 of the Meridian City Code GENERAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ZONING AMENDMENTS provides in part as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-O10) -12 The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment: 8.1 The new zoning will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 8.2 The area is not intended to be rezoned in the future. 8.3 The area is intended to be developed in the fashion that is allowed under the new zoning. 8.4 There has been no change in the area or adjacent areas which would dictate the area should be rezoned. 8.5 The proposed uses will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; 8.6 The proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing ox future neighboring uses; 8.7 The area «ill be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; 8.8 The use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; $.9 The proposed uses will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-oo-010) -13 ~ ~ or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; 8. I O The area will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; 8. I 1 The use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and 8.12 The proposed zoning amendment is in the best interest of the City of Meridian. DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WHICH ARE HEREIN ADOPTED, the City Council does hereby Order and this does Order: The Applicant's request for rezone of approximately 8.8$ acres for construction and development of an ambulatory care center is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of this Order hereinafter stated; and 2. The following special terms and conditions of use and development relate to this application to-wit: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 2.1 The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 2.2 The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) - 14 ~ ~ a. The bank parcel, as configured, has been shown for conceptual approval within the context of the proposed rezone. If there are significant modifications, as determined by staff, at the time a specific bank and site configuration are determined, such modifications shall require application for a modification of the current CUPlPUD application. As a modification, the bank parcel shall be reviewed on its own merit and either approved or denied without jeopardizing or compromising the approval of the current CUP/PUD application for Saint Alphonsus Medical Office Building. Significant modifications shall include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story}, etc. Additionally, in the event a bank project does not materialize, then applicant shall be allowed to develop any other principally allowed L-O use on that parcel, subject to staff's review and approval. If the nature of such a development were determined by staff to exceed the conceptual intent of the current CUP/PUD, then that change would also be require a modification as noted above. To clarify, any such modification shall be reviewed on its own merit. To clarify, the bank parcel is conceptual at this point. Any future development or action on this parcel is intended to be independent of the current application and approvals, specifically the ambulatory care/medical office building portion. The bank parcel, in no way, shall jeopardize the ability to proceed with the balance of the development. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. The material color palette presented are FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ {RZ-00-010) -I5 conceptual at this time. Applicant has freedom to modify colors in the future, subject to staff's review. c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine {9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. Applicant has updated the Master Site Development Plan providing an access point through the landscape berm along the east property line of the bank parcel to allow more direct access from these (9) parking stalls to the bank. 2.3 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-I-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 2.4 Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance 11-13 for use of undeveloped lots. 2.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 2.6 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 55 7, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 2.7 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 2.8 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.1C. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-OIO) -16 2.9 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 2.10 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-aut driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 2.11 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to z-ight-in/right-out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to accommodate the on-site median. 2.12 Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The eastern most driveway on Cherry Lane shall be shifted approximately 60 feet to the east to accommodate this policy. The revised Master Site Development Plan reflects this change. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-OIO) -17 ~ ,~ wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. 2.13 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. 2.14 Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement `~vith I5- foot curb radii. 2.I5 Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 2.16 Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mlle Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACHD Construction Services staff. 2.17 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 2.18 Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane is prohibited. Adopt the additional action of the Council from their February 20, 2001, meeting by incorporating the Applicant's letter of 02/12/01 as follows: 2.19 Pertaining to the site lighting, the applicant shall comply with the ordinance requirements, and specifically, the site lighting shall be designed so that light does not directly reflect or spill over into adjacent residential districts, that the site lighting arrangement shall be approved by the City Engineer and that applicant comply with the listed site lighting standards. A Conceptual Site Lighting Plan has FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-0X0) - IS been submitted to show the proposed site lighting arrangement, light levels and fixture types, and is on file with the City Clerk's office. 2.20 The "Hours of Business Operation" shall be defined as "Hours during which the facility is actually open for business and patients are on the premises being seen or treated." Additionally, to clarify facility maintenance, before or after hours staff preparation or other similar activities occurring when the facility is not open for business are not subject to "Hours of Business Operation" restrictions. 3. The City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate ordinance for the re-designation of the zoning for the real property which is the subject of the application to (L-O) Limited Office District (Meridian City Code § 1 I-7-2 G} which ordinance shall be considered far passage. 4. Subsequent to the passage of the Ordinance, provided for in Section 3 of this Order, the engineering staff of the Public Works Department shall prepare the appropriate mapping changes of the official Zoning Maps as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-21-1 in accordance with the provisions of the rezoning ordinance. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Tdaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the rezoning may, within twenty-eight (28} days after the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL. OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) -I9 date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. ~~ By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of /` / L~ ~ , 2001. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED COUNCILMAN IfEITH BIRD VOTED-~~~~. COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED_~y~~" COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED r~ MAYOR ROBERT CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: ~ `~ 6 ~ D( MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Worlcs Department and the City Attorney. By• ~ Dated: City Clerk ~ ~-o/ msg/Z:\WorkWl~IvleridianlMeridian 15360M~.StAls RZOIOCUPO5b1FfsClsOrderREZ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) $~ z T - za WHITE PETERSON WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIGRAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER CHRISTOPHER S. NYE 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 NAMPA OFFICE WM. E CiIGRAY, III PHILIP A. PETERSON POST OFFICE BOX 1150 104 N[NTH AVENUE SOUTH BRENT JOHNSON ERIC S. ROSSMAN MERIDIAN IDAHO 83680-1150 POST OFFICE BOX 247 D. SAMUEL JOHNSON TODD A. ROSSMAN , TEL (208) 288.2499 _____ NAMPA, IDAHO 83653.0247 ~ LARRY D. MOORS WILLIAM A MORROW DAVID M. SWARTLEY TERRENCE R WHITE** FAX (208) 288-2501 + ~` TEL (208) 466-9272 ~ ~ ~` `- ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ?~""Q ~ ~ FAX (208) 466-4405 WILLIAM E NICHOLS* _ ~~ ~' 'ALSO ADMITTED IN OR ''ALSO ADMITTED IN WA March 1, 2001 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE City Of Meridian City Clerk Office William G. Berg, jr., City Cleric MERIDIAN CITY HALL 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: SAINT ALI'HONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AMBULATORY CARE CENTER /REZONE FINDINGS, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CASE NO. AZ-00-010 Dear Will: Please find enclosed the onglnal of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING prepared as per instructions from the Council meeting of February 20, 200, and which are on the agenda for March 6, 2001. I have also attached hereto the Development Agreement for the above matter. After the Council meeting of March 6, 2001, if Council approves the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the above matter, then the Findings will need to be attached to the four Development Agreement as Exhibit "B". After the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order Granting Application for Annexation and Zoning have been adopted, please submit the Development Agreement to the owner/developer for signature. Very truly yours, Wm. F. Nichols ms~Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\StAls RZO1 OCUP056\FFCL and DevAgtCll:.lu- BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR REZONE OF APPROXIMATELY 8.88 ACRES FOR PROPOSED AMBULATORY CARE CENTER, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TEN MILE ROAD AND CHERRY LANE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO ST. ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, APPLICANT f I L E C~ P ~~~ 02-2°-°1 Case No: RZ-00-010 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR REZONE The above entitled matter on the rezoning application of 8.88 acres having come on for public hearing on February 20, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m., and Council having received the report of Brad Hawkins-Clark, Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant were Mike Ondracek, Darrell Fugate, Doug Racine and Wes Smith, and appearing in favor of the application was Dennis Durant, and those appearing in opposition, with comments and/or concerns were Dwayne Lingel, Penny Hanson, Brian I<indell, and Robert Morrision, and the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -1 Council having received the record of this matter made before the Planning and Zoning Commission, and having received their Recommendation to the City Council, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT The notice of public hearing on the application for rezoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to said public hearing scheduled for February 20, 2001, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the February 20, 2001, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) F -2 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-16-1. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and development ordinances codified at Meridian City Code Title 11 and Title 12, and all current zoning maps thereof, and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629 -January 4, 1994, and maps and the ordinance Establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 4. The property is approximately 8.88 acres in size. The property is generally located at the southeast corner of Ten Mile Road and Cherry Lane, Meridian, Idaho, and is described as follows: A parcel of land located in Section 11, Township 3 North, Range West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11 of Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho from which point the North 1/4 corner of said Section 11 bears South 89°03'40" East a distance of 2653.23 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West along the westerly boundary line of said Section 11 a distance of 300.00 feet; thence leaving said Section line South 89°03'40" East a distance of 45.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°03'40" East a distance of 681.14 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West a distance of 274.92 feet; thence South 89°20'00" East a distance of 416.35 feet; thence North 00°00'00" East a distance of 522.38 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way line of Cherry Lane; thence along said southerly right-of--way line, North 89°07'31" West a distance of 1067.02 feet; thence South 44°30'45" West a distance of 43.47 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of Ten Mile Road; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) ~. -3 thence along said easterly right-of-way line South 00°00'00" West a distance of 216.74 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 386,613 square feet or 8.88 acres more or less. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise, Idaho. 6. The Applicant is owner of record. 7. The property is presently zoned as R-4, and is fallow agricultural. 8. The Applicant requests the property be rezoned to L-O. 9. The proposed site is surrounded by a church and residential subdivision to the north, a church and residential subdivision to the south, a residential subdivision to the east and retail uses to the west. 10. The subject property is within city limits of the City of Meridian. 11. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 12. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: construction of an ambulatory care center. 13. The Applicant's requested rezoning of the subject real property as L-O is consistent with the commercial designation on the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Existing Urban. 14. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -4 ~.-. that affect the consideration of this application. 15. In review of the application for rezone it is provided at Meridian City Code § 11-15-11 for the General Standards that the Commission and Council review this proposed zoning amendment and pursuant to the criteria of said section finds that: 15.1 The new zoning will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan; 15.2 The area included in the zoning amendment is not intended to be rezoned in the future; 15.3 The proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area, subject to the conditions of the conditional use process; 15.4 The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses, subject to the conditions of the conditional use process; 15.5 The area will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; 15.6 The use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; 15.7 The use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -5 excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; 15.8 The area will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; 15.9 The use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and 15.10 The proposed zoning will be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15.2 Staff conditions provide as follows: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 15.2.1 The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 15.2.2 The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: a. The bank parcel, as configured, has been shown for conceptual approval within the context of the proposed rezone. If there are significant modifications, as determined by staff, at the time a specific bank and site configuration are determined, such modifications shall require application for a modification of the current CUP/PUD application. As a modification, the bank parcel shall be reviewed on its own merit and either approved or denied without jeopardizing. or compromising the approval of the current CUP/PUD application for Saint Alphonsus Medical Office Building. Significant modifications shall include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -6 Additionally, in the event a bank project does not materialize, then applicant shall be allowed to develop any other principally allowed L-O use on that parcel, subject to staff's review and approval. If the nature of such a development were determined by staff to exceed the conceptual intent of the current CUP/PUD, then that change would also be require a modification as noted above. To clarify, any such modification shall be reviewed on its own merit. To clarify, the bank parcel is conceptual at this point. Any future development or action on this parcel is intended to be independent of the current application and approvals, specifically the ambulatory care/medical office building portion. The bank parcel, in no way, shall jeopardize the ability to proceed with the balance of the development. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. The material color palette presented are conceptual at this time. Applicant has freedom to modify colors in the future, subject to staffs review. c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. Applicant has updated the Master Site Development Plan providing an access point through the landscape berm along the east property line of the bank parcel to allow more direct access from these (9) parking stalls to the bank. 15.2.3Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 15.2.40ff street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance 11-13 for use of undeveloped lots. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -7 15.2.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 15.2.6A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 15.2.7A11 signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be .permitted. 15.2.8 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.I~. 15.2.9A11 construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 15.2. lOConstruct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct a six-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 15.2.11 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right-in/right-out operations: Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISIONAND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) ,. -8 for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to accommodate the on- site median. 15.2.12Constnxct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing ar proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The eastern most driveway on Cherry Lane shall be shifted approximately 60 feet to the east to accommodate this policy. The revised Master Site Development Plan reflects this change. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4- feet wide and located outside of the public right-of-way. 15.2.13Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. 15.2.14Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. 15.2.15Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 15.2.16Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACRD Construction Services staff. 15.2.17Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 15.2.1 SOther than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -9 Cherry Lane is prohibited. ,'`1 Adopt the additional action of the Council from their February 20, 2001, meeting by incorporating the Applicant's letter of 02/12/01 as follows: 15.2.19Pertaining to the site lighting, the applicant shall comply with the ordinance requirements, and specifically, the site lighting shall be designed so that light does not directly reflect or spill over into adjacent residential districts, that the site lighting arrangement shall be approved by the City Engineer and that applicant comply with the listed site lighting standards. A Conceptual Site Lighting Plan has been submitted to show the proposed site lighting arrangement, light levels and fixture types, and is on file with the City Clerk's office. 15.2.20The "Hours of Business Operation" shall be defined as "Hours during which the facility is actually open for business and patients are on the premises being seen or treated." Additionally, to clarify facility maintenance, before or after hours staff preparation or other similar activities occurring when the facility is not open for business are not subject to "Hours of Business Operation" restrictions. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Council may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 2. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975", codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by the adoption of Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. No. 629, January 4, 1994. 3. The requested zoning of Limited Office District, (L-O) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-7-2 G as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -10 ~(L-O) Limited O~/zce District: The purpose of the L-O Districts to permit the establishment of groupings of professional, research; executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic, public service and similar uses. Research uses shall not involve heavy testing operations of any kind or product manufacturing of such a nature to create noise, vibration or emissions of a nature offensive to the overall purpose of this District. The L-O District is designed to act as a buffer between other more intense nonresidential uses and high density residential uses, and is thus a transitional use. Connection to the Municipal water and sewer system of the City is a requirement in this District. 4. Idaho Code § 67-6511 provides and requires that the City shall establish by ordinance one or more zones or zoning districts in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the ordinance establishing zoning districts can be amended with particular consideration given to the effects of any proposed zone change upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services, including. school districts, within the City's planning jurisdiction and that it is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides: Each governing board may, by ordinance adopted or amended in accordance with the notice and hearing provisions provided under section 67-6509, Idaho Code, require or permit as a condition of rezoning that an owner or developer make a written commitment. ' concerning the use or development of the subject parcel. The governing board shall adopt ordinance provisions governing the creation, form, recording, modification, enforcement and termination of conditional commitments. 6. The City of Meridian by the adoption of Meridian City Code § 11-15-12 has exercised its authority to require or permit as a condition of rezoning FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) -11 that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject property. 7. § 11-6-1 ZONING DISTRICT MAP provides in part as follows: The districts established in this Ordinance as shown on the Official Zoning Map, together with all explanatory matter thereon, are hereby adopted as part of this Ordinance. Where uncertainty exists with respect to the boundaries of any of the zoning districts as shown on the Official Zoning Map, the following shall apply: 7.1 Where district boundaries are indicated as approximately following the centerline of street lines, highway right-of- way lines, streams, lakes or other bodies of water, the centerline shall be construed to be such boundary; 7.2 Where district boundaries are so indicated that they approximately follow the lot lines, such lot lines shall be construed to be said boundaries; 7.3 Where district boundaries are so indicated that they are approximately parallel to the centerlines or street lines of streets, or the centerlines or right-of--way lines of highways, such district boundaries shall be construed as being parallel thereto and at such distance therefrom as indicated on the Official Zoning Map. If no distance is given, such dimensions shall be determined by the use of the scale shown on the Official Zoning Map; and 7.4 Where the boundary of a district follows a railroad line, such boundary shall be deemed to be located in the middle of the main tracks of said railroad line. 8. § 11-15-11 of the Meridian City Code GENERAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ZONING AMENDMENTS provides in part as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -12 The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment: 8.1 The new zoning will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 8.2 The area is not intended to be rezoned in the future. 8.3 The area is intended to be developed in the fashion that is allowed under the new zoning. 8.4 There has been no change in the area or adjacent areas which would dictate the area should be rezoned. 8.5 The proposed uses will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; 8.6 The proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; 8.7 The area will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; 8.8 The use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; 8.9 The proposed uses will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -13 or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; 8.10 The area will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; 8.11 The use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and 8.12 The proposed zoning amendment is in the best interest of the City of Meridian. DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WHICH ARE HEREIN ADOPTED, the City Council does hereby Order and this does Order: The Applicant's request for rezone of approximately 8.88 acres for construction and development of an ambulatory care center is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of this Order hereinafter stated; and 2. The following special terms and conditions of use and development relate to this application to-wit: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 2.1 The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 2.2 The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) - 14 ,~ ~ a. The bank parcel, as configured, has been shown for conceptual approval within the context of the proposed rezone. If there are significant modifications, as determined by staff, at the time a specific bank and site configuration are determined, such modifications shall require application for a modification of the current CUP/PUD application. As a modification, the bank parcel shall be reviewed on its own merit and either approved or denied without jeopardizing or compromising the approval of the current CUP/PUD application for Saint Alphonsus Medical Office Building. Significant modifications shall include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. Additionally, in the event a bank project does not materialize, then applicant shall be allowed to develop any other principally allowed L-O use on that parcel, subject to staffs review and approval. If the nature of such a development were determined by staff to exceed the conceptual intent of the current CUP/PUD, then that change would also be require a modification as noted above. To clarify, any such modification shall be reviewed on its own merit. To clarify, the bank parcel is conceptual at this point. Any future development or action on this parcel is intended to be independent of the current application and approvals, specifically the ambulatory care/medical office building portion. The bank parcel, in no way, shall jeopardize the ability to proceed with the balance of the development. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. The material color palette presented are FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) -15 conceptual at this time. Applicant has freedom to modify colors in the future, subject to staffs review. c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. Applicant has updated the Master Site Development Plan providing an access point through the landscape berm along the east property line of the bank parcel to allow more direct access from these (9) parking stalls to the bank. 2.3 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 2.4 Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance 11-13 for use of undeveloped lots. 2.5 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 2.6 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 2.7 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 2.8 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.I~. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -16 ~'1 2.9 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 2.10 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. Construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 2.11 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right-in/right-out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to accommodate the on-site median. 2.12 Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The eastern most driveway on Cherry Lane shall be shifted approximately 60 feet to the east to accommodate this policy. The revised Master Site Development Plan reflects this change. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER/ (RZ-00-010) -17 ~ n wide and located outside of the public right-of-way. 2.13 Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. 2.14 Pave all of the driveways their full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15- foot curb radii. 2.15 Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 2.16 Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACRD Construction Services staff. 2.17 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 2.18 Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane is prohibited. Adopt the additional action of the Council from their February 20, 2001, meeting by incorporating the Applicant's letter of 02/12/01 as follows: 2.19 Pertaining to the site lighting, the applicant shall comply with the ordinance requirements, and specifically, the site lighting shall be designed so that light does not directly reflect or spill over into adjacent residential districts, that the site lighting arrangement shall be approved by the City Engineer and that applicant comply with the listed site lighting standards. A Conceptual Site Lighting Plan has FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -18 been submitted to show the proposed site lighting arrangement, light levels and fixture types, and is on file with the City Clerk's office. 2.20 The "Hours of Business Operation" shall be defined as "Hours during which the facility is actually open for business and patients are on the premises being seen or treated." Additionally, to clarify facility maintenance, before or after hours staff preparation or other similar activities occurring when the facility is not open for business are not subject to "Hours of Business Operation" restrictions. 3. The City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate ordinance for the re-designation of the zoning for the real property which is the subject of the application to (L-O) Limited Office District (Meridian City Code § 11-7-2 G) which ordinance shall be considered for passage. 4. Subsequent to the passage of the Ordinance, provided for in Section 3 of this Order, the engineering staff of the Public Works Department shall prepare the appropriate mapping changes of the official Zoning Maps as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-21-1 in accordance with the provisions of the rezoning ordinance. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the rezoning may, within twenty-eight (28) days after the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) -19 date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~ ~ day of /G~~ G~-- 2001. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD VOTED-~~~`' COUNCILWOMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED_ i~~~ COUNCILWOMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED MAYOR ROBERT CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: ~' _ 6 -O~ MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and the City Attorney. By' ~ Dated: City Clerk msgfZ:\WorkU~t\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\ScAls RZOIOCUP056\FfsClsOrderREZ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF APPROVAL OF REZONING OF 8.88 ACRES FROM R-4 TO L-O ST. AL'S AMBULATORY CARE CENTER / (RZ-00-010) ~ ~-o/ \14``{ V ` ff`~~j/ ~~~ ~~~ i~~~lls 9 - 20 Ci ty of Mer idi an P bl ic Wor ks De pt. u Memo Ta Shelby prom: Steve O'Brien CC: Date: 04/04/01 Rey St. Als Ordinance Map Another map per your request. Frain the desk of... Steve O'Brien Engineering Tech . I Meridian Public Works lleparhrent 200 E. Carlton St, Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642 2600 (208) 887-2211 • Page 1 Fax: (208) 887-1297 u.,, ..-. bWfIXtlVVSN ; 3na 3 ~ [/3 O Z W U ~ a`fi .l w~ zwz ~~o W~~ Wo< ~ ~' 9s a U N ~ Z = ~ J o Z O ~o w~'"E Z Z O w~ V~ ~' 3 „t.m Q p w = N ~ e ~ O a vx~N E'i ~ J N Z 3~Y i9N fILS Q ~ J lL Ii 3 N ~ ~ 1N/1N C 3~Y3WJ N3AYN N 3 s E 3i1YQTHN(NYN ^ ,~ ~~ 3.00,0O.OON w ~~y O M rya N CO 31Y'JNIB Q ~ ~' 3AY YtlYA 3 V) zs~tiLa G ~ ~ o M.OOAOo00S ' o m rn ^ 3/~Y MO1DM N p~ O ~ $ ~ °~ Z W ^ ' _v "v C7 ~ LL Z ° s w O Z o ~O ~ F- Z_ N Z C1 d m ~YNOenmesN m ~ -- O ~ ~ ,tics~a M.OO~OO.OOS ~ ~~N~ /,VM IEB U'J ii17J N q~ 6 3 NYpN ~~~N ~ '~ N ~ N M~ ~ 8 M lAtl3 ['_ ~ WAv NV,UDFfaN1 1M 3 ~+ ~WNIiNN bM33N:1 3~ J ~°~ a Y g B } _ ~ N U ~ .~-. February 16, 2001 .'., RZ 00-010 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 20, 2001 APPLICANT BRS Architects ITEM NO. 13 REQUEST RZ of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center - SeC of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Rd. AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS See attached P ~ Z Item Packet See attached Recommendations ~' ~~ ~ ~'~ ~ C BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~'' ~ E'. G~~ ~~C ~I' ~ ~ ~,~T~~ . _ -1_G~ ~ _ ~ Contacted: ~~~~~;~~~ ~ Date:Z Phone: ?j~,(o-~3'7G1 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Merldlan. ~. ,m .~:~~`f ~: '.: ~, "SPA ~k. '~ RECEIVED JAN 12 2001 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ~Z~y ~F MERI.D~ Planning and Development Division Development Application Report MCUP00-056/MRZ-00-O10 s/e/c Ten Mile Road/Cherry Lane Medical facility/bank This application has been referred to ACRD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. The applicant is requesting conditional use approval to build an ambulatory care center and bank. The 8.8- acre site is located at the southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road. This development is estimated to generate 1,520 additional vehicle trips per day (0 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Roads impacted by this development: Cherry Lane Ten Mile Road ACHD Commission Date -January 17, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. ~_ ~. ~~; yt r K ~$ . ~. ~. ~~~`/R Yn`•? :. Facts and Findings: MCUP00-0>6.cnun Pa~~e 1 I I J.~ W 2 Q J } W I U I a n.rti o o E I a ~• .o, m o 0 0 1 0 I "" '~t° o`°'°te ': I °9t rO! ' n ~ ° a ~ ~ ° '• o°+` °rr aOrr 1 rg°r ... _ ............... ........... . °a. 1 • ... ................................ ° t ' - - I I SAOa-Al3AKNQL.~ 9tmo °!t ......-t... ....... ... . ~-- ....... ....... .. .. ~, 1 o°r a ~° ~,~ I .......° o a+ , r r :` ~ ~ I y rd, I :1 'root °l~,oo i °st80rr °steor `orrgO . °lor to ~ I s°rr ` ~ ~ rrb - ~ d~ re~ - rr~, to°s 1 !tp o ar ~ °` .. ..... rd, N ~rd~ tro pro `~ ~° .o °` ~ . t ~ I !to ~ ~`.`. !t8 s° !t~ !t8 i°tt o! orre ~ orr~ rrd ~ °rr d crr~ BOSr r~°r n ,, b m rd, :... ,....... • o ~ ~ 1 .°n o ^ °o m o 0 1p rrd, ': I i °rCy ~~r t'ri ~1 ~ ~ N N n N H N If tti ~ I O O ~ Q O O ~ ~ •° Oy 'art . ~e ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ its°r ~ I E ~O~t t0!£yr' Bo t8 I. I I I ..... iris ~ 30ooooor+ ... ° ry rr6 ~ °rr I ~ -orF~. - srb I :.: a r~ o~ ° I ~ I '~+' ~ ~.r, ~ e0r Leo ~tao 1 tao ~ ~ `°lr~O ' :>x~,~, °a~o~t r°! ot~o` =1 rt°gt I ^° rrd ~Orrb r~Orr I r~orr~ 1 a°rr~ I . Pr ~ I b o ,,. 3 ~ ~ !tm° ~ °°~o~ t°! s I °ro 1- tOVr or to t° !t eO ~ ~ orr~ orr~ gorrb 1 rr~ .. .~~~~5 .,,o~~ O n N _N N N 1 " 0 n 1 ~ ~~~ e N O h N ? N N R 2 ... . u•rn N O N n H N 3 ~ N O N r N N z d b N n N _N VI c c r r 4 tv»z oo•ai oo•ai srrxi vdoa a~iw nias. /~/• /•: j• / ,, j,. /,; j. r~i ~H~~ON z ,..;. ..~; `'~ ........ .............................................. o a 1 r~, ~r a ° n n 1 Pi+ °oe+ 1 `'~ p° r ~ =- =-1=-d =-= zcrzr ~/.~, i ~ Vii` ~ ! r I~I ~~ ~ ~~ f I_ iL ~. ITS ~~:.,~I=t~,,~S~c~ .-~, ~. __, ~_ N E ~_ ~ e - 1_ ~` ~ ~1.., 1_f_~i rrY; : e :~l ,~r'' 1,;~ 8 ~,~~ 51J31~H7aV anv wY~ rol xai ~v am u~o ~"~~' ~ , ie~ue~ lealpb, , ,euol6ey snsuo4dlV luleg ~ 3 ! .~. ~ u. v awvrNS an ~ `I ~ EI31N3J S3JI/~Fi3S l~tlOltl1f19Wtf ~ ~5 p YN ~ al umYaanao ®oxoiu N e W U C a a a z a ~i~- e W e •• x - A :x(~_ J: xei .fie .,¢ ~. MOOJOV ~ •y~ p y /~~/ . ~1D V ~ ~AR `: ~r! 1LRr Ii!J{Or+w.u]bd%'~:''~ _.v= N _ _~ -S~ ~F' ~~~ -r ?mot-._.. _ - ! 9 ;~, !, III G e I i i~ - I I i I i I i ~ I ~`'~ -~ .,j, 'i~ _ ~.\R ;SIG ,•. `,; .~` >r.G .i: I~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~i .i ~ ` `` ~~I' We F,.p~ . ~\,~ r ~~ -III I~:I ~, ~~-y:: ,_~ .' ",C' ' 'ta{ I • ~ y o~ ~ 'yak :x . ~~ F. iM ~ ~~eee YYal8~8 `~ a p ~ f~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ,~~ ~ altai~ !19:iA ae~g i ~ ~: -- --=- il~ '~ A' ^ ~ ~_ _^~` ~ w y I c I-~ R Fw ,~ ~?~~ _ ~ g Y 1 ~`~ - :U Ys YYYy tA, '~ 3~g~ I ~ [ I Iwl.:'. .:~:~. / !1 - :F=~ s PCB i Ye €~'iy~ ~ ~ eF I ' .~~: ~~~ ~+ ' .; ~ ~y ~ -el' xd:A:.:~ a ~~: ~ ~ !" g~ f I I ~n~ ~:~w.` `~:= _~~~ ~: ~~-~: .~x 5:,,~; ~~ F..' fi,~;< ~~~ ~~ x., A. GeneralInfonnation Owner - St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Applicant - BRS Architects R-4 -Existing zoning L-O -Requested zoning 8.8 -Acres 188,000- Square feet of proposed building 272 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada -Impact Fee Service Area Meridian -Impact Fee Assessment District Cherry Lane Principal arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count on 10/4/00 is 10,725 (e/o Ten Mile Road) Better than "C" -Existing Level of Service Better than "C" -Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 1,261 feet of frontage on Cherry Lane 105-feet existing right-of--way (60-feet south from centerline) No additional right-of--way required Cherry Lane is improved with a 5-lane street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the site. The Ten Mile Road/Cherry Lane intersection is signalized. Ten Mile Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 9,224 on 10/4/00 (s/o Cherry Lane) Better than "C" -Existing Level of Service Better than "C" -Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 630 feet of frontage on Ten Mile Road 90-feet existing right-of--way (45-feet from centerline) No additional right-of--way required Ten Mile Road is improved with a 5-lane street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the site. The Ten Mile Road/Cherry Lane intersection is signalized. B. On January 2, 2001, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On January 5, 2001, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. A9CUP00-0~6.crnm Pa~~e 2 ''"`, r1 a~,w ;~~: -; _~,~~: ~.R ~,~~; ~~ ~:~ :' <~~•, yew r' D. The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220- feet south of the signalized intersection at Chen-y Lane. District policy requires driveways on Ten Mile Road to be located a minimum of 440-feet from a signalized intersection for frill access, 220-feet for restricted right-i~~/right-out access, and 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. There is an existing driveway on Ten Mile Road located 40-feet south of the site that serves a church. An Albertson's store uses an existing driveway on Ten Mile Road located 40-feet south of the site on the opposite side of the street. The site has insufficient frontage for a full access driveway and does not meet the offset requirements from other existing driveways. The applicant is proposing to construct this entrance as a right-in/right-out driveway. Staff recommends a modification of policy of the required 150-foot offset requirement from the existing driveways to the south for the site's proposed driveway because the site has insufficient frontage to offset a driveway from both the intersection and the existing driveway to the south . If modification of policy is grated, the driveway will meet the required 220-foot offset requirement from the intersection. The applicant should be required to construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median should be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. E. Western Driveway: The applicant is proposing to construct aright-in/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road. District policy requires driveways on Cherry Lane to be located a minimum of 440-feet from a signalized intersection for full access, 220-feet for restricted right-in/right-out access, and 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. There is an existing driveway on Cherry Lane located 170-feet east of Cherry Lane that serves a church. Staff recommends that the applicant construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right- in/right-out operations so as not to restrict the existing driveway on the north side of Cherry Lane. The on-site median design should be reviewed and approved by ACHD Traffic Services staff, and should be signed for right-turn movements. The driveway may be constructed 40-feet wide to accommodate the additional width of the median. MCUP00-056.cnun Pa~~~ ~.y .. ~. ~r ,,~ ~x x,,a~~,, ,;;~.~:, F. Middle Driveway: The applicant is proposing to construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located 295-feet east of the proposed western driveway. District policy requires driveways on Cherry Lane to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways (measured near edge to near edge). The applicant has sufficient frontage to locate a driveway in conformance with District policy. The applicant should supply a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The applicant is proposing to construct this driveway 46-feet wide. ACHD allows that width for driveways with an island constructed within the driveway separating the inbound and outbound traffic and offering a pedestrian refuge. The island should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. G. Eastern Driveway: The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway on Cherry Lane located 295-feet east of the proposed middle driveway. District policy requires driveways on Cherry Lane to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways (measured near edge to near edge). The applicant has sufficient frontage to locate a driveway in conformance with District policy. The applicant should supply a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. The applicant has indicated that they may move the eastern driveway towards the east property line. ACHD does not have any restrictions on the placement of the driveway other than the offset requirements. H. Unless specifically approved, the driveways on Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road should be constructed 30 to 35-feet wide. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be required to pave the driveways their full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. The applicant should be required to replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. K. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. MCUP00-056.cmm Pa~~e 4 A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. L. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this report. Special Recommendation to the City of Meridian: 5,,, k_.. 1. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that tenants occupying ~.. .., the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACRD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed °=~~~ building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association ~~ku: (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary ';"'' that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. $~ }_ The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: 1. Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-in/right-out driveway on Ten Mile Road located approximately 220-feet south of the signalized intersection at Cherry Lane as proposed. ~~, x.; Construct asix-inch raised median in the center of Ten Mile Road, from a point 10-feet south ;„ ~.;, of the stop bar at the intersection to a point approximately 40-feet south of the southern edge of driveway. The median shall be constructed to NOT restrict the existing driveways on Ten Mile Road. Coordinate the design and location of the median with District staff. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. 2. Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide right-i~~/right-out driveway on Cherry Lane located approximately 230-feet east of the signalized intersection at Ten Mile Road as proposed. Construct an on-site median to restrict the driveway to right-iii/right-out operations. Submit a design of the median to the District's Traffic Service's Supervisor for review and a letter of approval. Sign the driveway for right turn movements. The applicant may construct this driveway a maximum width of 40-feet to acconnnodate the on-site median. Construct a 46-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Chen•y Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets MCUP00-O~6.cnun Pa~~e District policy. An island is required within the driveway and should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide and located outside of the public right-of--way. 4. Construct a 30 to 35-foot wide driveway on Cherry Lane located to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveways. Submit a site plan that indicates existing driveway locations on the north side of Cherry Lane to verify that the proposed driveway meets District policy. 5. Pave all of the driveways their frill width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement with 15-foot curb radii. .., 6. Replace any unused curb cuts on Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane with standard curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. s 7. Replace any damaged curb, gutter and/or sidewalk on Cherry Lane or Ten Mile Road with new ~. curb, gutter and/or concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. Segments to be replaced shall be determined by ACHD Construction Services staff. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in .~ writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. ~' ~-~;: 9. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel ,~~ access to Ten Mile Road or Cherry Lane is prohibited. ~~a,~~p Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACRD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $1 l 0.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission. at the next regular meeting of the MCUP00-056.cnnn Page 6 ~ .i. Commission. If the Commission. agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An "`' engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit ~,~;T' (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. b~. ,~~.~;-. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to s~ ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full ~`~ business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact .; ~~~;;.-° ACRD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are ~,: ~;, ,~> compromised during any phase of construction. ~x 4`: :> 8. No change in the terms and conditions ofthis approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this ~~ ~` a lication shall re uire the a licant to com 1 with all rules re ulations ordinances, Tans, pp q PP p y ~ g p ~u~ or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject ~' ` property unless awaiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. MCUP00-0~6.cmm Pa~~e 7 Conclusion of Law: ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. ~~._~ ~. ,~~« ;, ~.a,; ., ., r~~~ 6`:9-a:`ar. a(1r _ Submitted bv: Planning and Development Staff Commission Action: ~~CL)P~~-~~6.C1771n Page Januar~~ 16, 2001 RZ 00-010 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING January 18, 2001 APPLICANT BRS Architects ITEM NO. 6 REQUEST Rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for proposed St. Alphonsus Ambulatory Care Center Southeast corner of of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLEf2K: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLAPNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: SANITARY SERVICE: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA Iv1ERIDIAN IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: No Comment MFD will not have a problem with this rezone See attached comments No comment No comment See attached No objection to this proposal ~ vv~~c~~._d~ ~~ rc~v'~~-d ~' GEC ~~ ~ r^0 V e_ ~ ~ Contacted: ~ ~'~,~ ~ ~ Date: ~ `G~ `j~ Phone: ~~ "~~ 7~> Materials presented at public meetings shall became property of the City of Meridian. ~. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ^~ ~k MAYOR Robert D. Cowie ~ A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT ~ ~ ` CITY CO CITY OF MERIDIA (Zpg) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 ~ UNCIL MEMBERS 1 \ PUBLIC WORKS ~' Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT t. t" Keith Bird MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 ~' Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING ~"" ~ ; Cherie McCandless Cit Clerk Office Fax 208 888-4218 y ( ) DEPARTMENT ~ 9 (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 a y• 4~~uxr,ly~ t . ~ TRANSMITTALS ' TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPM ENT PROJECTS ~i "( i ~'', ,,~ .. WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN At Tr Fil Re M~ By La ;, - ~: ~:_ - :, - ~' - .~, ,~ Gen - <' ~'j , 4'';F~~: ~ ~ ; ,. ~* i f ~ r r~` ,1 ~ ~ ~ To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and. recommendations to Meridian City Hall Will Berg,. City Clerk, by: January 10, 2001 Ismittal Dater becember 14, 2000 Hearing Date: January 18, 2001 No.: , RZ 00-010. nest: Rezone of 8:88 acres from R-4 to L-O for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional ~ical Center Ambulatory Care Center BRS Architects Rion of Property or Project: southeast corner Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Jerry Centers, P/Z Richard Hatcher,. P/Z Keith Borup, P2 Robert Corrie, Mayor I ammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird,.C/C _ c:nene McCandless, C/C _ Water Department _ Sewer Department _'Sanitary Service _ Building Department Your Conci; _ Fire Department - 9'~ w~-~ Police Department Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District .Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian brig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Remarks: _~~ ~~~ . f~jo °:.,: ,: ~~,. i '~ /_ JAN - ~ tQQ~ ~~fA~~ ''~ HtIB OFTF~~R.S7IRE vAIJ,EY MAYOR - A Good Place to Li` e (~~ ~ ~ ` A Rol~rt D. c~rae CITY OF MERIDIAN crrY coL~Tc1L ME1~iBFRC Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO ~ ~ j~/, a j Keithsird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83CrE2 !U Tatruurry deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fri (Z08) 887-4813 ' City Qerk Office F'ax (208) 888-4218 ~ ND ~ f Q~erie McCandless MEMORANDUM: January 16, 2001 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission ~~ C~ ~.~ ,..~r From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer L~ SAN ' ~ 201 Brad Hawkins-Clark, Planner /~~~ pity of Meridian ~it~ Clerk ~ffie~- Re: St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center - Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to Construct an Ambulatory Care Center on 8.88 Acres in a Proposed L-O Zone by BRS Architects for St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center (File #CUP-00-OS~ - Request for a Rezone of 8.88 Acres from R-4 to L-O by BRS Architects for St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center (File #RZ-00-010) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY These two applications pertain to two parcels of land (#S 1211223092 and #S 1211223022) located at the southeast corner of West Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road, currently fallow agricultural ground. The Rezone application requests both parcels be rezoned to Limited Office (L-O), which allows both medicaUclinic uses and banks as outright permitted uses. Since the Applicant is proposing multiple buildings on a single parcel (they are not proposing to plat the ground at this time), a CUP/PUD application is required. The Conditional Use Permit application proposes to construct three (3) buildings and two (2) lobbies associated with the medical center (at approximately 88,800 s.f.) and one bank (at 4,753 s.f.). The Applicant also intends to submit a Lot Line Adjustment application to shift the current parcel line approximately 450 feet to the west to create a 1.1-acre parcel for the proposed bank. The ACRD Commission will review this application at their January 17t'' meeting. The ACHD staff report recommends the Applicant relocate the easternmost, 46-foot access drive off Cherry Lane to either align or offset from the main entry into Sunburst Subdivision on the north side of Cherry Lane. They are restricting the Ten Mile driveway and the westernmost driveway off Cherry to a right- in/right-out only. There are no existing stub streets to either parcel. LOCATION & SURROUNDING USES The subject parcels are located at the SE corner of Ten Mile Road and Cherry Lane. The project site has 1,066 feet of frontage on Cherry and 216 feet of frontage on Ten Mile Road. The property is located in an area designated as Existing Urban in the Comprehensive Plan. CUP-00-056, RZ-00-010 St Als Med Center..rz.cup Mayor, Council and P&Z January 16, 2001 Page 2 The surrounding uses follow: North - A Seventh Day Adventist church is situated at the NE corner of the intersection, zoned R-4. Sunburst Subdivision, zoned R-4, is on the north side of Cherry Lane. South - An LDS church, zoned R-4, fronts on Ten Mile Road directly south and has athletic fields behind the church building (enclosed with a chainlink fence). Five (5) residential lots in Haven Cove Subdivison No. 3 also abut the south boundary at the east end. East -Eight (8) residential lots in Haven Cove Subdivision No. 3 abut the eastern boundary, zoned R-4. West - Albertsons and other retail stores, zoned C-N. OWNER OF RECORD Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Inc. is the current property owner of both subject parcels. Sandra Bruce, representing the titled owner, has provided notarized consent for the applications. REZONE GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The legal description submitted with the rezone application is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. 2. The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Area and designated as Existing Urban in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The subject property can be adequately served by public facilities. 4. If rezoned to L-O, the subject parcel would conform to the minimum area, bulk and height standards. 5. The proposed L-O zone and its allowable uses would, if adequate screening is constructed, allow for uses compatible with the neighboring residential uses. REZONE SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 1. The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City. 2. The following conditions pertaining to the proposed bank site shall be included in the Development Agreement: a. Any significant modifications to the subject site plan as approved by the City will require submittal of a new CUP application, whether or not the future use is permitted in the L- Ozone. Significant modifications will include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. b. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. CUP-00-056, RZ-00-010 St Als Med Center.rz.cup Mayor, Council and P&Z January 16, 2001 Page 3 c. All required parking stalls and landscaping must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. A pedestrian crossing through the landscape planter must be constructed to connect this row of parking with the bank if these stalls are required as part of the future bank site. REZONE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 2. Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with the city of Meridian ordinance 11-13 for use of undeveloped lots. 3. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11- 13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. 4. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 5. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 6. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 7. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL USE/PUD REQUIREMENTS 1. As part of a Conditional Use Permit, the City of Meridian may impose additional restrictions/conditions. 2. Sanitary sewer service to this site is proposed to come from existing mains located in Ten Mile Road and water service from the existing mains on the north side of Cherry Lane and in Ten Mile Road. Main sizing and routing shall be coordinated through the Public Works Dept. as part of the construction plan process. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development. Please provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. CUP-00-056, RZ-00-010 St Als Med Center.rz.cup Mayor, Council and P&2 January 16, 2001 Page 4 3. Assessments for sewer and water service are determined during the building permit application process. 4. In accordance with City Ordinance 11-13-4.B.2., underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the landscaped areas. 5. In accordance with ACHD's special recommendation to the City of Meridian, Staffrecommends that St. Alphonsus provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACRD on employee participation. Commuteride staff are available to coordinate the program with the Applicant. 6. The Applicant is proposing to adjust the existing parcel lines in order to create three (3) different parcels -Parcel 1 (2.77 acres), Parcel 2 (5 acres) and the bank parcel (1.1 acres). It's not clear to Staffon the Site Plan where the new parcel lines will be located. Ordinance 12-3-10 states that the City may approve the relocation of original lot lines under certain guidelines. Lot line adjustments are not permitted where the relocation changes the original number of parcels. If the Applicant intends to actually create a third parcel (from the existing two), than a subdivision application must be submitted. If the intent is to maintain just two parcels in order to create a separate parcel for the bank, it appears this would fall within ordinance guidelines. The Lot Line Adjustment application and Record of Survey must be approved by the City prior to submittal for building permits. 7. The Site Plan (Sheet SD-lA) shows a 30-foot entry drive along the south property boundary from Ten Mile Road into the site interior. Fifteen (15) parking stalls are proposed along this boundary, all of which would take direct access off the driveway. As the sole vehicular access to the medical center facility from Ten Mile Road, Staff assumes this route will be heavily traveled with both ingress and egress traffic from the medical center and bank. We have some concern about vehicles backing-up into this driveway. The Site Plan is providing 40 parking stalls above the City-required minimum. Eliminating these stalls would not jeopardize this ordinance and we recommend they be removed. 8. The trash enclosure proposed along the southern boundary to serve the bank appears to be located too far west for the sanitary waste trucks to effectively access the enclosure. The location should be reviewed with Sanitary Services Co. and, if necessary, relocated accordingly. 9. The compactor at the south end of the service dock should be screened with a block wall or other effective sound barrier to prevent noise pollution to the south. CUP-00-056, RZ-00-010 St Als Med Center.rz.cup Mayor, Council and P&Z January 16, 2001 Page 5 10. The newly-adopted landscape ordinance prohibits evergreen trees within street buffers. There are several evergreens proposed along Cherry Lane. These trees must be removed and replaced with deciduous trees and/or shrubs. Applicant must submit a revised landscape plan at least seven (7) days prior to the City Councih hearing. The evergreens proposed along the east and southern boundaries are allowed and approved as submitted. 11. It does not appear that the Applicant is proposing any kind offence or wall along the south or east boundaries between the site and Haven Cove No. 3 subdivision. There is an existing, six-foot cedar fence the full length of the eastern boundary but not along the south boundary. The planting buffer and berm may be adequate along the east boundary but, given the lack of screening behind the southern houses, the Applicant should be required to construct a fence or wall. The Applicant should address this issue at the P&Z Commission hearing and state their intentions of how to provide screening along both boundaries. 12. The Applicant is not proposing a specific .tenant at this time for the bank pad shown at the west end of the site. The bank pad with drive-thru is shown as a concept only - no proposed building elevations were submitted. The Applicant is requesting the City to approve the location and use of the proposed bank as a part of this CUP/PUD application. At a future date, they will provide detailed building elevations and floorplans under the staff-level building permit approval process. If the Commission and Council approve the rezone and CUP applications (including the proposed drive-thru), Staffrecommends the following conditions be placed on the proposed bank pad and be included as conditions of the rezone Development Agreement: d. Any significant modifications to the subject site plan as approved by the City will require submittal of a new CUP application, whether or not the future use is permitted in the L- Ozone. Significant modifications will include, but not be limited to, expansion of the total building square footage, addition of any drive-thru aisles, change in building height (e.g. anything above single story), etc. e. The construction materials for the proposed bank must include metal roofing and either brick or brick veneer. f. All required parking stalls must be located within the boundaries of the future bank parcel. As proposed, the row of nine (9) stalls along the east boundary of the bank parcel have no access to the bank. A pedestrian crossing through the landscape planter must be constructed to connect this row of parking with the bank if these stalls are required as part of the future bank. 13. The 25-foot perimeter landscaping buffer on Ten Mile Road and the 35-foot buffer on Cherry Lane abutting the proposed bank pad must be planted as a part of the medical center phase and either be completed or bonded for completion prior to Certificate of Occupancy on the medical center buildings. CUP-00-056, RZ-00-010 St Als Med Center.rz.cup Mayor, Council and P&Z January 16, 2001 Page 6 14. The proposed boulevard monument sign in the main entry landscape median must be constructed outside the clear vision triangle and should be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from the property line. 15. As a PUD, a minimum of 10% of the gross land area must be either open space or landscaped area. The Site Plan shows a total of 111,397 s.f. of landscaped area on the site, which exceeds the City's minimum area requirement. GENERAL CONDITIONAL USE/PUD REQUIREMENTS 1. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 2. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E. of the Gity of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 3. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 4. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as to not direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. 5. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 6. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 7. Provide a minimum of one (1) three-inch (3") caliper tree per 1,500 sq. ft. of asphalt area on the site in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.B.3.c. 8. All trash and/or garbage collection areas shall be enclosed on at least three (3) sides in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-12-1.C. Coordinate trash enclosure locations and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company (SSC) and provide a letter of approval from SSC to the Planning & Zoning Department prior to applying for building CUP-00-056, RZ-00-010 St Als Med Center.rz.cup ."ti Mayor, Council and P&Z January 16, 2001 Page 7 /~`1 permits. 9. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 10. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance. 11. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Rezone and Conditional Use Applications with the above conditions. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies that are relevant to this application. Staff has selected the following sections that most directly apply to the proposed project for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process. Population Chapter 1.6U -Encourage and support new businesses which offer higher-than-average-wage jobs and upward employment mobility to locate in Meridian. Economic Development Chapter 1.2 - ...set aside areas where commercial interest and activities are to dominate. 1.4 -Positive programs should be undertaken to support existing commercial areas to ensure their continued vitality.. . 1.6 - ...support shopping facilities which are effectively integrated into new or existing residential areas, and plan for new shopping centers as growth and development warrant. Land Use Chapter 4.3U -Encourage new commercial development within under-utilized existing commercial areas. 4.4U -Locate new planned Neighborhood Commercial Centers (3-8 acres) on arterials or collectors near residential areas in such a way as to complement but not conflict with adjoining residential areas. 4.8U -Encourage commercial uses...to locate in the Old Town district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as freeway interchanges. 5.18U -Existing residential properties will be protected from incompatible land-use development. ..Screening and buffers will be incorporated into all development requests in this area. CUP-00-056, RZ-00-0 ] 0 st Als Med Center.rz.cup Mayor, Council and P&Z January 16, 2001 Page 8 Transportation Chapter 1.SU -Encourage clustering of uses and controlled access points along arterials. 1.9U -Encourage residential and non-residential developments to provide adequate easements for future pathways. Community Design Chapter 1.4 -Major entrances to the City should be enhanced and emphasized. 1.6 -The addition of landscaping within existing commercial parking lots should be encouraged. 2.2U -Encourage area beautification through uniform sign design that enhances the community. 4.4U -Encourage landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors. The City shall require, as a condition of development approval, landscaping along all entrance corridors. CUP-00-056, RZ-00-010 St Als Med Center.rz.cup NOTICE OF HEARING ~, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on January 18, 2001 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of BRS Architects for rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-O for St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center; Furthermore, the applicant also requests a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development in a proposed L-O zone for St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center generally located on the southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hatl, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 14th day of December, 2000 PUBLISH December 29th, 2000 and January 12th, 2001 ,~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CI Y CLERK ~~y~,~t. ~Jf ~~fr ~( J hA'` 1CA ~A''. 'LJ y ~. =.j! ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~, ~~ l~ ~1p>~" :~ .` 3`~~ ~--~, r.. NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on January 18, 2001, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the applications of: The Land Group, Inc., for Preliminary Plat approval of 5 building lots on 6.95 acres in an L-O zone for the proposed Mallane Commercial Complex generally located at the northwest corner of Fairview Avenue and North Hickory Way; BRS Architects for rezone of 8.88 acres from R-4 to L-0 for St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center; furthermore, the applicant also requests a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development in a proposed L-O zone for proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center generally located on the southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road; Treasure Valley Engineers, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new office /warehouse building in a floodplain for Big D Builders generally located at King Street and Baltic Place; Leavitt and Associates Engineering for annexation and zoning of 8.15 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Staten Park Subdivision; furthermore the applicant also requests Preliminary Plat approval of 24 building lots and 5 other lots on 8.15 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Staten Park Subdivision generally located east of Black Cat Road and south of Ustick Road; Janet Torgensen for a Conditional Use Permit for a child care center for 24 children in an R-15 zone for proposed ABC Club Daycare and Preschool located at 650 West Broadway; Hubble Engineering for annexation and zoning of 5.4 acres from RT to R-8 for a proposed Planned Unit Development for proposed Kodiak Development generally located west of Meridian Road one-half mile south of Overland Road; PUBLISH December 29~', 2000 and January 12"', 2001 City of Meridian ~• City Clerk's Office 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 8364 2 ST. '`~ Ambulatory Care Center St. Alphonsus Regir~l Medical Center, Inc. 1055 N. Curtis Rd. Boise Id 83706 Robert & Phyllis Charters 3280 Sugar Creek Dr. Meridian Id 83642 Soutliem Idaho Corporation 777 Fairview Avenue Boise Id 83704 DD8~F 501 SE Columbia Shores Blvd Vancouver Wa 98661 Joseph & Deborah Miller 3012 W. Ann St. Meridian Id 83642 Vaughn & Audrey Schultz 2996 W. Ann St. Meridian Id 83642 Robert Hanft 6542 N. Fox Run Ave. Meridian Id 83642 Alan & Dime Yarrington 2940 W. Ann St Meridian Id 83642 Roger & Christy Beavers 2930 W. Ann St. Meridian Id 83642 Mid~ael Mad~los 1679 N. Victor Ave. Meridian Id 83642 Jeffrey & Julie Vrba 2892 W. Ann St. Meridian Id 83642 Jerry & Dar>ette Hurst 2860 W. Ann St Meridian Id 83642 Bany Lalkd 1662 N. Morello Ave. Meridian Id 83642 Charles & Teresa Smith 1653 N. Victor Ave. Meridian Id 83642 Willard & Leona Hanks 3057 W. Ann St. Meridian Id 83642 Phillip & Cassie F•lenderson 2835 W. Ann St. Meridian Id 83642 Thomas & Stacey Gents 3039 W. Ann St. Meridian id 83642 Jeffrey & Pamela Pugmire 3015 W. Ann St Meridian Id 83642 Mid'tael ~ Denice Ankenman 2993 W. Ann St. Meridian Id 83642 Shad & Jenny Durfee 2851 W. Ann St Meridian Id 83642 Linda Gudell 2971 W. Ann st. Meridian Id 83642 Sunburst Homeowners Associations 3775 Cassia St. Meridian Id 83642 Rosalie Fisdier 2935 W. Ann st. Meridian Id 83642 Debra Diarxla 2887 W. Ann St. Meridian Id 83642 Penny Hansen 2869 W. Ann St. Meridian Id 83642 Alberlsons Inc. PO Box 20 Boise Id 83726 Robert & Dolores Reynolds 5036 Bel Air St Boise Id $3705 The & Thuy Thi Do Quang 4319 Flltwrst Ave. Baldwin Park Ca 91706 SI Development 3350 Americana Ter Ste 200 Boise Id 83706 Christina Reyralds 2828 W. Leroy Court Meridian Id 83642 Tammy Ady 2824 W. Leroy Court Meridian Id 83642 Lori Greif 2812 W. Leroy Court Meridian Id 83642 Darren Byington 2780 W. Leroy Court Meridian Id 83642 Gregory & Rose Thies 2827 W. Leroy Court Meridian Id 83642 Stephan Skogsberg 2813 W. Leroy Court Meridian Id 83642 Jose Luis & Arx3elip Zurita 1519 Haven Cove Ave. Meridian Id 83642 Todd & Mishelle Walden 8374 S. Dansldn Lane Meridian Id 83642 LDS Church of Jesus Christ 50 E. North Temple St Fl 22 SLC Ut 84150 Naomi & Rodney Plumley 2826 W. Leonard Court Meridian Id 83642 Cory & Jac~lirre Doman 2814 W. Leonard Court Meridian Id 83642 Curtis & Kelleen IOein 1485 Haven Cove Ave. Meridian Id 83642 Steve & Angie Marie Glover 2$30 W. l.:eonard Court Meridian Id 83642 Cheri Mercer 2829 E. Leonard Court Meridian Id 83642 Sharon Allcott 2815 W. Leonard Court Meridian Id 83642 Michael Sean Schneider 1443 Haven Cove Ave. Meridian Id 83642 Luis & Maria Urias 2827 W. Leonard Court Meridian Id 83642 Alice Allen & Karen Bruner 1389 N. Claa Ave. Meridian Id 83642 Mary Barney 3933 W. Harbor Point Dr. Meridian Id 83642 Huit 1992 Revocable Tnrst 7461 lJsddc Nampa Id 8364? ~'3 ~ Jill Sander 2946 W. Sheryl Meridian Id 83642 city of Meridion ""~ ST. ~ Ambulatory Care Center cny clerk's olfke 33 East Idoho Meridian, Ib 8364 2 Doris Min 2915 Land Wehr Rd. North Brook iL 60062 Czria Mace 2892 W. Sheryl St. Meridian Id 83642 John & Rose Rosen 2832 W. Sheryl St. Meridian Id 83642 Robert & Jerelyn Hofman 2810 W. Sheryl St Meridian Id 83642 Bryan Koch 1377 gara Ave. Meridian Id 83642 Storehouse Evangelical Corp. 1450 Ten Mile Road Meridian ID 83642 pa~~ gurde{t 2949 W. Sheryl St. Meridian id 83642 Gregory & Barbara Bergeson 2923 W. Sheryl St. Meridian Id 83642 Ctuislpph~ & Laurel lGmbrough 2895 W. Sheryl St. Meridian Td 83642 t eonard & Sharon Yancey 2859 W. Sheryl St. Meridian Id 83642 Brett & Angie Pike 2835 W. Sheryl St. Meridian Id 83642 Rayme & Wendy Long 2813 W. Sheryl St. Meridian Id 83642 David & Ginger Elsey 2783 W. Sheryl St. Meridian Id 83642 Richard Allen 1349 N. gars Ave. Meridian Id 83642 John & Less Dwonch 2948 W. Willard St. Meridian Id 83642 Russell Moore 2922 W. Willard St. Meridian Id 83642 Jon Simmons 2894 W. Willard St Meridian Id 83642 Steve & Tapia Johnston 2858 W. Willard St. Meridian Id 83642 Detyn & Donna Barksdale 2834 W. Willard St. Meridian Id 83642 Shane & Mki~elle Maxey 2812 W. Willard St. Meridian Id 83642 Michael & Jitl Hansen 1331 N. tiara Ave. Meridian Id 83642 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on February 20, 2001, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of BRS Architects for rezone of 8.88 acres for the proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center; Furthermore, the applicant also requests a Conditional Use Permit fora planned- unit development in a proposed L-O zone for the proposed St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center generally located at the southeast corner of Cherry Lane and Ten Mile Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, and is availab{e for inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing, and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Oral testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes per person. Written materials may be submitted seven (7) days prior to the above hearing date so that all interested parties may examine them prior to the hearing. DATED this 19th day of January, 2001 PUBLISH 2~' and 16"' of February, 2001 ILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CLERK ~~N~,us4a, l~Irt;I p ~~ ~~ _~r.~~r,,r~~~ *. 4 sent ~y: ; %,. \ ,~.` 208 888 6854; NOV-21-00 4:05P~4; P~qe 7/7 .-.. - _- ~ -z - ~ _. _ ~ ~ -I --- ~ _ _ _ -- - i- __. I LL O . O r O O N w O O O t0 l_ ~' - ~. -- l ...~. ~:: T~~ ~,, ~.. O c~ O Theldaho Statesman P.O. Box 40, Boise, Idaho 83707-0040 CJ "'~/ ~~. ~ J ~ LEGAL ADVERTISING PROOF OF PUBLICATIC)N Account M DTI1t Identification • - Amount: 064514 380190 NOTICE OF HEARING $86 52 Ordered by: P.O.it Rate . Run Dates ~ DEC. 29, 2000, JAN. 12 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN , Number of Lines 33 EAST IDAHO ST . 5 8 .MERIDIAN, ID 83642 Affidavit Legal N 1 9185 JANICE HILDRETH, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the Principal Clerk of The Idaho Statesman, a daily newspaper printed and published at Boise, Ada County, State of Idaho, and having a general circulation therein, and which said newspaper has been continuously and uninterruptedly published in said County during a period of twelve consecutive months prior to the first publication of the notice, a copy of which is attached hereto: that said notice was published in The Idaho Statesman, in conformity with Section 60-108, Idaho Code, as amended for: TWO consecutive weekly single consecutive daily odd skip insertion(s) beginning with the issue of: DECEMBER 2 9 , 2000 and ending with the issue of: JANUARY 1 2 , 2001 .. STATE OF IDAHO ~ ) )SS COUNTY OF ADA On this 1 2 day of JANUARY in the year of 2001 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared before me Janice Hildreth known or identified to me to be the person whose name subscribed to the within instrument, and being by me first duly sworn, declared that the state- ments therein are true, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same. Z~~ 4- Notary Public for Id o Residing at: Boise, Idaho ~~ ,,N~•Od~iila ~s~MA.~lcpires: v~Q ~3 ~.+ P ~...... G.$. ~. ~.` q4.•' '•• T '•. •~. 0 ~~ ~ypTARY '~'y~ . y • • • ~~~ i * i ~i ~ *' ~bUBLt ~ •' ~ ~ q ' ' • • . . . . . • • ' ~ , 4 ~ • • , . Certified Mailing Returns Pro'ect Name F'I ~ ~ G G' ~~ j ~,~ 1 i e No(s) ., i ;j~ 1 ~' Date of Hearing ~ Name Address Reason for Return c ~j ` a. ~ { -~- .. w n ~ % " ~i' 1 ~ .. }~" ~ ir1~: ((,E 's.!k- i~~j ti° :~ ' ~" t =~ ' ,• ,~~+:; r i' _ t ~ . ~. /'_ ` t " 6t'1'~--~ ~~,-,