HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-09-18~~ivC E IDIAN~-
IDAHO
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR
MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, September 18, 2012 at 7:00 PM
Roll-Call Attendance
X David Zaremba X Brad Hoaglun
O Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Community Invocation by Gordon Slyter of Treasure Valley Worship
Center
4. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted.
5. Consent Agenda Approved
A. Approval of Award of RFQ and Master Agreements for
Professional Services and Authorize the Purchasing Manager
to Sign the Non-Financial (Zero Dollar) Master Agreements
with the 18 Firms Listed Below in the Following Categories:
• 1B-Water Supply and Distribution Engineering -Waterline
Construction, Rehabilitation, and Reconstruction
/Replacement Design. (Civil Survey, JUB, Keller)
• 26-Wastewater Collection and Treatment Engineering Lift
Station Design and Consultation. (JUB, Keller, Murray Smith
& Associates)
• 7A-Electrical Engineering -Wafer and Wastewater Control
Systems and SCADA System Design and Programming.
(CH2M Hill, Control Engineers, DC Engineering)
• 8A-Environmental Engineering -Reclaimed Water Program
Development, Design, Etc. (Brown & Caldwell, CH2M Hill,
JUB)
• 86-Environmental Engineering - NPDES Stormwater
Consulting; Environmental Assessment for NPDES
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda-Tuesday, September 18, 2012 Page 1 of4
All materials presented al public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office al 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Permitting; Wetlands Delineation and Wetlands Mitigation,
Stream, Wetland, and Riparian Environment Restoration
(Brown & Caldwell, CH2M Hill, HDR)
• 10A- Geographic Information Systems G/S System
Development and Upgrades. (Brown & Caldwell, JUB,
Resource Dafa)
6.
7
8.
B. Agreement for Professional Services with Kathy Drury-Bogle
Consulting, LLC for Human Resources Consulting Services
C. Pressure Reducing Valve Easement Agreement with Logan
Kinney
D. Final Order for Approval: FP 12-018 Reserve No. 2 by ERD,
LLC Located West of N. Locust Grove Road and East of N.
Jericho Road Request: Final Plat Approval of 14 Residential
Lots and 2 Common Lots on 5.01 Acres in an Existing R-4
Zone
E. Ratification of the Approval and Release of Beer, Wine and
Liquor License Transfer for Colco Investments Co., dba Bill n
Lynns Place to Brigette S. Wallace dba Construction Zone Bar
& Grill Located at 229 West. Franklin Road
F. Resolution No. 12-872: A Resolution of the City of Meridian
Amending the Policy and Procedure Manual Policy 4.3.1 -
Leave Pool for Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Qualifying
Event
Community Items/Presentations
A. Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning
Items Moved From Consent Agenda None
Action Items
A. Public Hearing: PP 12-005 Canterbury Commons by Heartland
Homes, LLC Located at South Side of W. Pine Avenue, East of
N. Ten Mile Road Request: Preliminary Plat Approval of 107
Residential Lots and 12 Common Lots on 21.45 Acres in an
Existing R-15 Zone Approved with Conditions
B. Public Hearing: MDA 12-002 Canterbury Commons by
Heartland Homes, LLC Located South Side of W. Pine Avenue,
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda -Tuesday, September 18, 2012 Page 2 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents andlor hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
East of N. Ten Mile Road Request: Amend the Recorded
Development Agreement (Inst. #106187188) for the Purpose of
Removing Certain DA Provisions That Are No Longer
Applicable AND Adding New DA Provisions Relevant to the
Proposed Canterbury Commons Subdivision Approved with
Conditions
C. Public Hearing: CPAM 12-003 Olson & Bush by Ronald W. Van
Auker Located at 2950 E. Franklin Road Request: Amend the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Designation on
5.66 +/- Acres of Land From Commercial to Industrial
Approved
D. Public Hearing: AZ 12-003 Olson & Bush by Ronald Van Auker
Located at 2950 E. Franklin Road Request: Annexation and
Zoning a Total of 7.2 Acres of Land to the C-G (1.41 Acres) and
I-L (5.78 Acres) Zoning Districts Approved
E. Public Hearing: CPAM 12-002 Paramount East by Brighton
Development Located West Side of Meridian Road, Between
W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road Request: Amendment
to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to Change
the Land Use Designation on Approximately 12.90 Acres of
Land from Office to Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Approved
F. Public Hearing: RZ 12-001 Paramount East by Brighton
Development Located West Side of Meridian Road, Between
W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road Request: Rezone of
12.47 Acres of Land from the L-O (Limited Office) Zone to the
R-8 (Medium Density Residential) Zone Approved
G. Public Hearing: PP 12-002 Paramount East by Brighton
Development Located West Side of Meridian Road, Between
W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road Request: Preliminary
Plat Approval of 46 Residential Lots and Six (6) Common Lots
on 12.90 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone Approved
H. Public Hearing: CPAM 12-001 TM Crossing by Brighton
Investments LLC, Steven Smith and CRS10 Located Northeast
Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Request: Amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to Change the
Land Use Designation on 75.5 Acres of Land from LC (Lifestyle
Center), MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) and HDE
(High Density Employment) to Commercial Approved
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda -Tuesday, September 18, 2012 Page 3 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
I. Public Hearing: AZ 12-005 TM Crossing by Brighton
Investments, LLC, Steven Smith and CRS10 Located Northeast
Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Request: Annexation and
Zoning of 89.22 Acres of Land from the RUT Zoning District to
the C-G (General Retail & Service Commercial) Zoning District
Approved with Conditions
J. Public Hearing: PP 12-003 TM Crossing by Brighton
Investments, LLC, Steven Smith and CRS10 Located Northeast
Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Request: Preliminary Plat
Approval of 50 Commercial Building Lots and Four (4)
Common/Other Lots on 75.5 Acres of Land Approved
K. Amended onto the Agenda: Public Hearing Continued from
March 27, 2012: AZ 11-003 King Property by Dexter King
Located at 1195 W. Overland Road Request: Annexation and
Zoning of 8 Acres of Land within an R-8 Zoning District
Continued to November 6, 2012
9. Department Reports
A. Mayor's Office: Letter of Support for the Meridian Anatomy
and Physiology Laboratory
10. Ordinances
A. Ordinance No. 12-1527: On Ordinance (RZ 11-001 McNelis
Subdivision) for the Rezone of a Parcel of Land Located in the
SE'/4 of Section 34, Township 4N, Range 1W, Establishing and
Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification for 16.24
Acres of Land from the L-O Zoning District to C-G Zoning
District and .43 Acres of Land from the L-O District to the I-L
Zoning District and Providing an Effective Date Approved
11. Future Meeting Topics None
Adjourned at 9:13 p.m.
Meridian Cily Council Meeting Agenda -Tuesday, September 18, 2012 Page 4 of 4
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Cily of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Meridian City Council September 18, 2012
A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday,
September 18, 2012, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, David Zaremba, Keith Bird, and Brad
Hoaglun.
Members Absent: Charlie Rountree.
Others Present: Bill Nary, Jaycee Holman, Pete Friedman, Sonya Watters, Bill Parsons,
Tracy Basterrechea, Kenny Bower, Warren Steward, Brian McClure, and Dean Willis.
Item 1: Roll-call Attendance:
Roll call.
X David Zaremba X Brad Hoaglun
Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
De Weerd: I will go ahead and call this meeting of the City Council to order. For the
record it is Tuesday, September 18th. It's 7:00 p.m. Or; actually, it's-three minutes after
7:00. We will start tonight's meeting with roll call attendance, Madam Clerk.
Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance
De Weerd: Thank you. Item No. 2 is our Pledge of Allegiance. Tonight we will be led
by Eagan Schaffer. He is with Troop 166 of the Meridian 16th Ward. Eagan, come
ahead and come forward and we will follow your instructions.
(Pledge of Allegiance recited.)
De Weerd: Eagan, I do have a City of Meridian pin I would like to give you for leading
us tonight. Thank you. We love having Boy Scouts join us at our meeting. So, thank
you and we hope we keep your interest.
Item 3: Community Invocation by Gordon Slyter of Treasure Valley Worship
Center
De Weerd: Item No. 3 is our community invocation. Tonight we will be led by Pastor
Gordon Slyter. He is with the Treasure Valley Worship Center. If you will all join us in
the community invocation or take this as an opportunity for a moment of reflection.
Thank you for joining us.
Slyter: Thank you. Let's pray. Our Father as we come before you tonight we come
with thanksgiving for so many blessings. Thank you for our city and for all that goes into
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 2 of 48
it. We thank you for the good and godly people who serve us in city government, in our
school system, in our public services sectors. Thank you, Lord. At the same time we
realize that to be alive is to have problems. Individuals have problems. Cities have
problems. Nations. Our world with problems filled. And so, Lord, problems cause us to
turn to you not only with thanksgiving, but with request and supplication. Help us. We
call on your name. We pray, Lord, that you would make your will to be done on earth as
it is in heaven. We remember, Lord, that righteousness and justice are the very
foundations of your throne. And so when we call on your name, Lord, we are calling for
righteousness to prevail and for justice to prevail, not only in our city, but in our land and
around the world. Thank you, Lord, that you hear us when we cry to you. Thank you
for past, present, and future deliverances. We pray these things in the name of Jesus
Christ, our Lord, amen.
Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda
De Weerd: Thank you for joining us. Item No. 4 is adoption of the agenda.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: A couple items to note and add to the agenda for this evening. Under 5-F,
that resolution number is 12-872. Under 8, following J, we need to add on an 8-K,
which is a public hearing continued from March 27th, 2012, AZ 11-003, King property by
Dexter King, located at 1195 West Overland Road, request annexation and zoning of
eight acres of land within an R-8 zoning district. So, that -- we are adding that onto the
agenda. And, then, 10-A, that is Ordinance No. 12-1527. So, Madam Mayor, I move
adoption of the agenda as amended.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as amended. All those
in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 5: Consent Agenda Approved
A. Approval of Award of RFQ and Master Agreements for
Professional Services and Authorize the Purchasing Manager
to Sign the Non-Financial (Zero Dollar) Master Agreements
with the 18 Firms Listed Below in the Following Categories:
1B-Water Supply and Distribution Engineering -
Waterline Construction, Rehabilitation, and
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 3 of 48
Reconstruction /Replacement Design. (Civil Survey,
JUB, Keller)
• 26-Wastewater Collection and Treatment Engineering
Lift Station Design and Consultation. (JUB, Keller,
Murray Smith & Associates)
• 7A-Electrical Engineering - Water and Wastewater
Control Systems and SCADA System Design and
Programming. (CH2M Hill, Control Engineers, DC
Engineering)
• 8A-Environmental Engineering - Reclaimed Water
Program Development, Design, Etc. (Brown & Caldwell,
CH2M Hill, JUB)
• 86-Environmental Engineering - NPDES Stormwater
Consulting; Environmental Assessment for NPDES
Permitting; Wetlands Delineation and Wetlands
Mitigation, Stream, Wefland, and Riparian Environment
Restoration (Brown & Caldwell, CH2M Hill, HDR)
90A- Geographic Information Systems GIS System
Development and Upgrades. (Brown & Caldwell, JUB,
Resource Data)
B. Agreement for Professional Services with Kathy Drury-Bogle
Consulting, LLC for Human Resources Consulting Services
C. Pressure Reducing Valve Easement Agreement with Logan
Kinney
D. Final Order for Approval: FP 12-018 Reserve No. 2 by ERD,
LLC Located West of N. Locust Grove Road and East of N.
Jericho Road Request: Final Plat Approval of 14 Residential
Lots and 2 Common Lots on 5.01 Acres in an Existing R-4
Zone
E. Ratification of the Approval and Release of Beer, Wine and
Liquor License Transfer for Colco Investments Co., dba Bill n
Lynns Place to Brigette S. Wallace dba Construction Zone Bar
& Grill Located at 229 West. Franklin Road
F. Resolution No. 12-872: A Resolution of the City of Meridian
Amending the Policy and Procedure Manual Policy 4.3.1 -
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 4 of 48
Leave Pool for Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Qualifying
Event
De Weerd: Item 5 is our Consent Agenda.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: Under 5-F, as previously noted, that is resolution number 12-872 and I would
move approval of the Consent Agenda and the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and second to approve the Consent Agenda. Madam
Clerk, will you, please, call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 6: Community Items/Presentations
A. Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning
De Weerd: Item No. 6 is our Community Items/Presentations. Tonight we will hear a
presentation on neighborhood pedestrian and bicycle planning. Good evening, Brian.
McClure: Good evening, Madam Mayor, Council. Over the last several months Caleb
and I have had the opportunity to work with Justin Lucas and ACHD on a project
spearheaded by ACHD to identify areas within our downtown which are lacking in
pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The culmination of this effort is the downtown Meridian
pedestrian and bicycle plan. The plan which integrates and considers related efforts
contains specific and feasible recommendations for new pedestrian and bicycle facilities
throughout the downtown area, is something that's currently in draft format, but
hopefully will be approved shortly by ACHD. Our next steps will be to reference this
plan within the city's comprehensive plan in Chapter 3, Strategic Growth. This will also
take a look at the Meridian pathway plan to identify areas where the ACHD plan, the
parks pathway plan, can be better integrated, so that they speak to one another. With
that, unless there are questions, I will turn this over to Justin.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Good evening, Justin. If you will, please, state your
name and address for the record.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 5 of 48
Lucas: Certainly, Madam Mayor. Justin Lucas. I represent the Ada County Highway
District. Business address is 3775 Adams Street, Garden City, Idaho.
De Weerd: Thank you for joining us.
Lucas: Yeah. Thanks so much for having me. I have enjoyed this project and some of
the other projects I have worked on with the City of Meridian. This one in particular
because pedestrian-bicycle needs are exciting and a lot of people want them and so it's
great to talk about things people want. So, I will just -- I will move through this
presentation relatively quickly. If you have any questions at anytime, please, feel free to
just interrupt me, jump in, and hopefully I will be able to answer those.
De Weerd: You might regret saying those word. Just saying.
Lucas: Thank you. As Brian stated, the purpose of this plan was to -- really, this is a
new effort for ACRD. We are starting this neighborhood emphasis for our pedestrian
bicycle plans. We started out with our large plan. We have a bicycle master plan that's
countywide and we have our pedestrian-bicycle transition plan, which is also
countywide, but what we have found is that these large plans are hard to implement at
the neighborhood level, because it's really nice to talk to the people that actually use the
facilities to find out what's the priority and what we should do first and so we have
started this planning process of talking to citizens directly at the neighborhood level,
smaller geographies, so we can ask them, you know, if you were going to walk where
do you walk, where would you like to walk, where would you like to bike and the input
we receive goes into these plans and helps us and you make decisions about what the
priorities should be. So, what we have done -- our plan is pretty straight forward with a
needs analysis, is we take the area -- as you can see here this -- this downtown area,
which is -- we defined it for this plan, the purpose of this plan, Linder, Locust Grove,
Cherry, to basically, the freeway. And this was the area we took a close look out -- look
at. There is one school within the area -- actually two because you have -- you know,
there is three. I'm even speaking out of -- you know, I think there is four because of the
Renaissance High School. Look at this. You know. It's incredible. You would think in
an area like this you wouldn't have that much going on, but there is four schools. You,
obviously, have your downtown center and you have a post office -- there is all kinds of
things going on and so what we do when we look at this is we start with these kind of
generators and attractors and decide, you know, where are people wanting to go, how
can we best serve them, what are the projects that we need to go after for a plan like
this and, then, we take it out to the public and we say, okay, well, here is what we think
you might want, what do you really want? And the way we did that -- which is a new
tool we have been using is an interactive online map where the public can actually go in
-- it's like a Google map interface, they can double click on a location and just type what
they want or they can say, you know, here I want to go from here to here and just type a
little -- you know, their comment and we found through this process that it's -- it's been a
really effective form of outreach for this type of project and we are planning to
implement this on many other projects that we are doing like this, because it really gives
the public a chance to -- with the map interface it gives them a chance to make a very
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 6 of 48
specific comment on what they are looking for and through the process and our
traditional public meetings we had over 65 comments for the -- for the downtown area.
So, here is a representation of some of the recommended pedestrian projects that came
out of this -- out of this plan. The thick lines that are recommended projects -- and you
can see that that dark purple, those are all projects that were actually in the process that
we were planning on constructing in your downtown. You can see the split corridor
there, but in association with the split corridor we are doing several pedestrian projects
that link through the downtown in east-west format. So, that's that dark purple. The
lighter blue thick lines are recommended projects. Some of the key ones that came out
of this were 3rd Street, that connection, especially the split corridor. That changes
some of the network downtown. 3rd Street is going to be that other option to travel
north-south through the area and that's important for those pedestrians and bicyclists.
Some of the things down in kind of the southeast quadrant, Central Drive, and some of
the other kind of more commercial areas -- people still walk through there or they run
through there or they -- you know, now with the high school down there we have kids
walking in that area and so it's an important area to look at. And in several other
projects in the area that we are -- that we are recommending in the plan. This is a
recommended bicycle network. You can see the dashed lines would be new projects,
the solid lines of projects that are already on the ground right now. Once again a lot of
activity. And this is nice, because you can see your proposed pathways in green.
Those would be the connection points that Brian was talking about, how do we integrate
the pathways plan with our on-street network and this plan speaks to that and tries to
resolve some of those potential issues. And so these are the recommended projects
there. So, how does it all fit together? As you know, ACHD has its -- through its
community programs sets aside about four million dollars a year to attack these
problems. It seems like a lot of money, but for -- well, you know, as money goes it
doesn't seem to go very far. But the nice thing about it is it's dedicated local funding
source. This is not a funding source that fluctuates every year based on federal funding
or federal grants, this is money that the ACHD commission sets aside specifically for
these projects and that really has been an incredible benefit to the users of the system
who want to ride more -- who want to ride their bike more, who want to walk more.
Federal funds. We also always look for federal funding for projects like this, but to be
honest, with the new regulations and the new transportation bill, federal funds are
getting less and less and so that local funding source really is the one that -- that we are
-- that we rely on most and also local partnerships and we have been successful with
these, both with the City of Meridian, other cities in the community, is that through
redevelopment and urban renewal there is also opportunities to get projects like this
done. And the ACHD commission in a partnership situation can advance a project
much quicker, when there is evidence of other public investment everyone -- it should
be that everyone wants this happen and it can really make a project move forward. So,
that's kind of how we are going to attack getting these -- these projects done. So, the
results of all this effort is a neighborhood pedestrian bicycle plan specific to your
downtown. It's not a broad countywide plan, it's a plan for Meridian and that's why it's
great that your planning -- as Brian said, if you were to adopt this by reference in your
comprehensive plan we think that's a great step, because, then, you have it adopted,
we have it adopted, and it gives us a real focus and a vision to move forward. Also it's
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 7 of 48
an educational resource for the citizens and a planning guide for both you and ACHD to
work off of and we are excited about this. We did this plan as one of our first ones. Our
other one we did on the central bench in Boise, which was a very interesting place to
work. A lot of similar characteristics to downtown Meridian. And we are excited about
these, because it gives us an opportunity to plan and, then, we have a funding source to
go implement it, which isn't always the case and so we want to make these happen and
we want your help and your help to prioritize the projects as we move forward. So, the
next steps -- we are going to make any revisions based on your staff or your comments
as they come in. I am going to take this plan in draft form, along with the central bench
plan, to our commission on October 3rd for their comment and, then, it's our plan to
adopt these on October 24th and move, then, forward into the implementation phase.
These plans are not too complex, they are relatively simply and we hope they are
simple to implement and that's our goal is make it something that we can go after and
actually complete the network as it's shown in the maps there. So, unless you have any
questions that's what I wanted to present to you tonight. Obviously, I don't have to take
comments now, but any comments you may have you can funnel those back through --
through your staff or I can take them directly, whatever you prefer.
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: Thank you. I'm aware from history of years past when you have raised
bicycle issues in Boise there is a significant bicycle community that comes out to
contribute information and stuff. I'm not aware of whether that happens in Meridian or
not. Was there a bicycle community participation in this?
Lucas: Madam Mayor, Councilman Zaremba, you know, I think you're right, the bicycle
community in Boise kind of closer to the regional core is a little bit larger, but their
network is working also better than what we have here in Meridian. What we have seen
in Meridian is an increased number -- an increased interest over time. I started with
ACHD -- it was over four years ago and one of my first projects was getting the bicycle
plan adopted and since that time countywide we have seen an interest in bicycle issues
and when the -- the vehicle registration fees passed and you know how that that went
and there was that overwhelming majority of citizens that wanted that money to go
towards pedestrian and bicycle issues, the citizens in Meridian voted just like the
citizens of Boise on that. So, we really have seen an interest in that. And I think over
time as we are able to make the network better we will see an increase in ridership and
I think we already have, it's just a matter of really making some key connections that
aren't there now and trying to fill those gaps to make it so you can have a little bit of a
longer trip on your bicycle.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 8 of 48
Hoaglun: Justin, I notice you had -- that you have the online map, you got comments,
there are 65 comments, different things. What was your primary market effort? I mean
what worked best? Were there several different ways you reached out to get the
comments? How did that process work?
Lucas: Madam Mayor, Councilman Hoaglun, you know, we always use multiple
techniques at ACRD for outreach. We do a lot of outreach on a lot of different projects.
So, what we have found is one of the -- one of the best ways -- and what we did in
downtown Meridian was we actually sent a post card to everyone who lives in the
downtown, including some of the business owners, and so they got a direct contact from
the ACHD to solicit in your comments. We also located -- you may have seen them or
you may not have -- we locate what we call sandwich board signs and we located those
throughout the study area asking for comments from people and those are actually quite
effective. When we do our surveys to find out how did you find out about it, it's
surprising how many people stop and look at those signs, because they see it and they
go, oh, ACHD is doing something, I better to go look at what that is. And so we got
quite a few comments that way. And, then, also distributing it to stakeholders, we used
the city's website, ACHD's website, so kind of that multi-pronged approach is how we
tried to attach it for this project.
Hoaglun: Thank you,
De Weerd: Justin, Iguess -- I see that there are two difficult types of bicyclists and I
know you have heard me say this before. You have the bicyclists who think that they
are cars and so they don't mind riding on the road or in the shared space or even in the
bicycle lanes, but I guess my question might be rhetorical. Do we expect kids to ride on
the streets in those -- in those bike lanes next to a busy road.
Lucas: And, Madam Mayor, Ican -- it's a rhetorical question, but I can try to speak to
that at least. And my answer, you know, from a bicycle planner's perspective is,
honestly, probably not. I mean little children probably don't belong in a bike lane on a
busy arterial street, because they are not comfortable enough, you know, riding a
bicycle to do that. So, when you do a bicycle plan like the one we have shown here,
you have to provide all kinds of options for all the different levels of riders and from the
transportation perspective there is operational benefits to ACHD to provide a bike lane
on an arterial. One of those benefits that is that you have space for acyclist -- let's say
a commuting cyclist to ride, but how many commuter cyclists ride on those? You're
right, it's not a very large percentage. But if a vehicle is stalled and needs to pull over
we provide a safety shoulder and you can use that bike lane for other things. So, there
are advantages to providing that space. But I think what this plan did, which may be
different from other plans, is we really did try to link it in and integrate it with your off-
street path network, because that's the network that's very likely that a child would use
or be more comfortable using, is riding on a path that's not even adjacent to a roadway
at all, that's off street, much like the Bud Porter path and some of the other paths in
Meridian. Those are the -- the key connection that might be easier for some type of
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 9 of 48
riders to use and if we can implement that in a roadway project, we would live to, but
oftentimes it's difficult, because of the space you need to provide a path like that.
De Weerd: And I guess, Justin, that's why I asked the question. If we want to
encourage an increased ridership of bicycles we have to provide a safe option and that
is transportation and using General Fund monies for paths that move people, need to
be a collaborative partnership between ACRD and the city and some of those funds that
I think that the voters anticipated going towards .improvements like that are anticipated
to be on off-road type of facilities as well and so I guess I want to continue my beating of
the drum in that regard, because I do believe if we are to change habits we have to
create those habits at a young age and it's not going to happen with the kind of facilities
that we are providing today. Any other comments from Council? Okay. Thank you.
Lucas: Thank you so much.
De Weerd: Brian, do you have anything further? Okay. Nothing further on this item?
Okay. Thank you.
Item 7: Items Moved From Consent Agenda
De Weerd: Okay. There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda.
Item 8: Action Items
A. Public Hearing: PP 12-005 Canterbury Commons by Heartland
Homes, LLC Located at South Side of W. Pine Avenue, East of
N. Ten Mile Road Request: Preliminary Plat Approval of 107
Residential Lots and 12 Common Lots on 21.45 Acres in an
Existing R-15 Zone
B. Public Hearing: MDA 12-002 Canterbury Commons by
Heartland Homes, LLC Located South Side of W. Pine Avenue,
East of N. Ten Mile Road Request: Amend the Recorded
Development Agreement (Inst. #106187188) for the Purpose of
Removing Certain DA Provisions That Are No Longer
Applicable AND Adding New DA Provisions Relevant to the
Proposed Canterbury Commons Subdivision
De Weerd: So, we will move into Item 8 under Action Items and I will open the two
public hearings on Items 8-A and 8-B, public hearing for PP 12-005 and MDA 12- 002
with staff comments.
Parsons: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The first hearing item
this evening is Canterbury Commons Subdivision. This property is located on the south
side Pine Avenue just east of North Ten Mile Road. In 2006 Council approved
annexation and preliminary plat and a conditional use permit fora multi-family
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 10 of 48
development consisting of 196 units and 67 townhomes. With that approval a DA --
development agreement was required and is pretty much tied to that approval back in
2006. The applicant is here before you tonight to request the preliminary plat of 104
single family lots now. You can see surrounding this property to the north and to the
east is single family residential. Off to the northwest and to the west you have some
existing multi-family that's developed in the area and, then, also along -- at the hard
corner of Pine and Ten Mile you have some commercial -- vacant commercial
properties that can develop with some commercial development in the future as well. I
would mention to Council that -- that the proposed plat is pretty consistent with the
surrounding residential single family residential subdivisions in the area. Therefore,
staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission found that the proposed development
did comply with the mixed use designation that's on the project today. Here is what the
-- here is the proposed plat before you this evening. The applicant is proposing three
development phases. The first, of course, would be starting in the northwest corner
and, then, heading southeast and, then, finishing it off in the northeast corner. Wanted
to let you know that since the P&Z hearing the Commission -- that the applicant has
revised that central area here that I have highlighted on the west -- at least the left-hand
exhibit you can see how the open space was presented to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and on the right is the new layout that Commission -- or, excuse me, the
applicant would like you to act on this evening. The reason for the change is a
requirement that came down from Public Works., It's their requirement that they provide
a looped water system within the development. The adjacent subdivision -- the
adjacent subdivision to the east is the only viable location to make that connection, so
that at some point Public Works will have to go in and do a project to finish that
connection point, but the applicant is conditioned at this point to stub a water line into
that common lot that you see there in the lower right-hand corner. Would also mention
that even though the lot configuration changed, the lot count has not changed. Actually,
the open space has increased from what the Planning and Zoning Commission acted
on and what you see before you this evening. So, the central open -- the central park
actually increased approximately from 19,000 square feet in size to over 22,000 feet in
size and that will also include a tot lot. I'd also let you know that although the lots within
the subdivision do comport to the R-15 zoning standards, which is pretty minimal at this
point, the minimum lot size in the zone is 24,000 square feet. Typical lot sizes for this
subdivision is between 5,000 square feet and 19,000 square feet and the primary
difference between the discrepancy in the lot sizes has to do with the irregular shaped
size of the property. I'd like to point out that amenities included with this subdivision do
-- are pretty substantial. Along the west boundary you have a ten foot pathway as
required by the Meridian pathways plan. The applicant is providing a 22,000 square
foot central park with a tot lot. There is some additional micropath lots that are provided
as well and, then, along Eagle -- or, excuse me, along Pine Avenue the applicant has
provided the required landscape buffer. And if Council would note, it's along the
southern boundary. You can see there is a green space provided there. That is a
future common lot that you may have a pathway at some future point. I know in
speaking with the parks department it's -- if the 16 foot pathway isn't allowed to go
within the right of way, the railroad right of way, Parks Department has instructed staff to
go ahead and get some of these common lots in place, so that if we can't get in that
Meridian Cily Council
September 18, 2012
Page 11 of 46
right at least there is common lots preserved that we can have a pathway along the rail
corridor in the future. The applicant has provided some sample elevations for you. You
can see there is a mix of building materials before you this evening. Wainscoting, rock
wainscoting, some shutters, decorative corbels. The DA requires compliance with these
elevations. Also I would mention to Council that any elevations that front on a common
space or a public street will have to have the same decorative detailing on those sides
as well and that's conditioned in the DA as well. So, moving forward here are the
revised DA provisions that we present to you this evening. As I mentioned to you earlier
there is an approved development agreement on this site. Currently that DA restricts
this site to 116 buildable lots and 263 residential units. The applicant only has 104 lots
and they want all single family homes. So, that's one of the major changes. Also
mention because of the revised changes to that central open space and the open space
in general, the proposed landscape plan no longer complies with what you're acting on
today and we want to make sure and tie that into the development agreement. So,
before that DA could be finalized we are asking that a revised landscape plan be
attached to the amended DA as well. Move on. That bullet point 5.1.11 references
condominium plats. Again this is no multi-family development, so that is longer
relevant. We need to strike that. One of the previous DA provisions requires that a bus
stop be provided or at least an easement be provided for a future bus stop and that will
remain in place. The applicant has asked for additional verbiage if it's required by VRT.
Staff is okay with that. Staff has conditioned that they comply with ,the submitted
elevations and, then, staff is also recommending two additional DA provisions to the
amended DA. The first requires that all the landscaping and sidewalk improvements
occur with phase one. I know -- if Council has driven by down Pine Street you can see
a development has occurred on that site and given the economic climate there that
property went back to the bank, it is now under new ownership. Well, there is a
segment of sidewalk that is not completed with the project and I know that's important to
get folks to school in a safe manner, so it would be nice to get that -- that final
connection out there so kids can walk on a sidewalk and get to the adjacent schools in
the area and so staff has conditioned in the DA that that improvement, along with the
landscape, happen with phase one of development and, then, also the southern lot that
I mentioned to you staff is requiring that that be held in perpetuity, so that if and when a
pathway is planned for that common place will -- common lot stay in place forever and
insure that a pathway can go in there or stay landscaped as part of the subdivision
improvement. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at the August
16th hearing. Speaking favor was Scott Noriyuki. There was no one there testifying in
opposition or providing any other written testimony. Key issues of discussion at that
Commission hearing. There were none. Commission did make some
recommendations to the staff report. The first was that they were to add some
requirements for some common lots. The second was originally staff had
recommended that they lose a buildable lot and central park open space. That was no
longer applicable and so the applicant -- Commission struck that. Also wanted to point
out that because the loop water system is required and that central park was an
important amenity to the subdivision, Commission recommended that that happen with
phase two. The applicant has amended the phasing plan to show that before you this
evening, so that has been adjusted to include that. And, then, also the Commission
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 12 of 40
wanted a revised landscape plan in front of you this evening. The applicant did provide
that, but at the last minute this afternoon I got another revision that I'm going to discuss
with you this evening, so that's why you don't see those changes. The applicant did
provide written testimony in agreement with the -- or in agreement with the preliminary
plat conditions, but they do want to discuss some timing and some DA provisions with
you and I have highlighted that in the hearing outline. So, I will start with the first bullet
point. Staff would recommend that -- again we support this, that if you go along with the
applicant's proposed changes to that central open space and that lot configuration, that
Commission -- or excuse me -- that Council approve this with 104 single family
residential lots and not the 103 as presented to you. Second is right now the way our
recommendation is before you this evening we are recommending that the landscaping
and that sidewalk be completed in its entirety with phase one. I believe the applicant
wants to discuss with -- they are okay with constructing the sidewalk, but they are not
willing -- they want to hold off doing the landscape improvements until phase three. I'd
also make mention to Council that with that sidewalk -- we hope that the developer
would entertain putting in at least the streetlights along frontage as well, so that we have
appropriate lighting along that walkway for safety concerns. In the wintertime it can get
pretty dark along those roadways, so it would be nice to at least get that with a sidewalk
if you agree with the applicant's changes tonight. And, then, finally the applicant's
asking Council to defer that -- the improvements for Lot 26, Block 1, which is that
southern, common lot, so the future pathway they are asking me to defer that -- those
improvements until phase three. The phasing plan that I presented to you show it was to
happen with phase two, so staff is sticking with the -- wants Council to basically approve
that provision that that landscape -- that lot be developed with phase two and not phase
three as proposed by the applicant. So, consistent with the phase boundary the
applicant presented. We did receive additional testimony from Steve Meharry. He had
some concerns with the design to make sure it was consistent with the adjacent
subdivision. The applicant reached out to that concerned citizen, addressed his
concerns, staff follows up with a phone conversation with Mr. Meharry and concurred
that everything had been worked out and all the issues had been resolved. So that has
been settled. Other than the items the applicant wants to discuss with you, there aren't
any other outstanding issues before you this evening and at this time I would be happy
to answer any questions you have.
De Weerd: Thank you, Bill. Council, any questions?
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: Question for Bill on that railroad common lot along the south boundary there.
Maintenance of that -- is that by parks or is that going to be part of the HOA?
Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, at this point it will be the
maintenance of the HOA, homeowners association.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 13 of 48
Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Anything further at this point? Okay. Would the applicant's
representative like to come forward? Thank for joining us. If you will, please, state your
name and address for the record.
Noriyuki: Madam Mayor, Council, Scott Noriyuki, 6810 Fairhill, Boise, Idaho. 83714.
De Weerd: Thank you, Scott.
Noriyuki: First of all, I want to thank staff. That was an excellent report as far as all the
different items that have changed on this project. I'm in absolute concurrence with
everything that he has represented. I just want to clarify a couple of items, so I'm going
to try and do them as orderly as I can. First of all, the utility connections on a phase-by-
phase basis are kind of critical to us as far as we are going to economically go through
this project. We are in concurrence. I believe that staff, as well as Public Work is in
concurrence. However, I just want to reiterate the fact that we will make the water line
connections on a phase by phase specific basis. The only out of phase item is going to
be in the phase two portion where we are going to make the connection to the east in
the common lot that we had talked about. From there I want to jump into the Pine
Street frontage.. So, first of all,. I want to clarify that within, the, phase one we ,are
proposing to -- or we agree, rather, to complete a hundred percent of the improvements
on Pine Street, landscaping, lighting, sidewalks, all of those items. What we are asking
for is the phase three frontage of Pine, we are asking for lateral, if you will, because we
are going to be putting up a tremendous amount of money between utilities and
whatnot. I understand and I respect the safety aspect, so we are happy to do the -- the
grading, the aggregate, the sidewalk connection, as well as tactifying the soil, but we
would like to push off the actual landscaping until phase three, not only from an initial
financial standpoint, but also from an HOA economic standpoint, this is going to load up
these initial owners with heightened costs for maintenance. Further, where we got the
drain in the northeast corner, I'm asking that during phase one when we make the
sidewalk -- we complete the sidewalk construction, that we don't do the actual roadway
widening and most importantly the box culvert widening. That's an incredible cost for us
that's outside of our phase one. I went out and I measured it from the fog lines of the
edge of pavement we have got between ten and 12 feet from the headwall of the box
culvert to the edge of the asphalt. What I'd like to do is I'd to like run the sidewalk right
up to it, dead end it and, then, complete it on the other side and, then, do a temporary
pave around it, which I think is going to give us enough from a safety standpoint for
children or pedestrians or bikes to maneuver through that safely. But we don't have to
bear that cost until that phrase specific time. And with that I will stand for any questions.
De Weerd: So, Scott, the -- around the box goes on the road side or on the property
side?
Noriyuki: Yes, ma'am. On the road side. Because we have to travel over the box
culvert, if you will. That's the bridge per se. There is adequate room to safely do this,
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 14 of 48
which would be consistent with a lot of sidewalk -- detached sidewalk scenarios you
would see all over Ada County. We just don't want to put in the additional box culverts
to ultimately widen the road until that particular phase. It will require for a full permit
several thousands of dollars, so we are just asking for that lateral.
De Weerd: So, how close would that be to the existing roadway?
Noriyuki: If we did a five foot paved up against the head wall, if you will, which is a
small pony wall or parapet wall to the edge of the ditch, we would probably have
somewhere between a five and six foot separation from the end of the sidewalk --
temporary asphalt sidewalk to the edge of the existing asphalt road.
De Weerd: Okay. Okay. Questions from Council?
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: A question from Bill I guess and this is -- I vaguely remember that we have
some requirement that all perimeter landscaping be done at once. Is that commercial
properties or does that apply to residential as well or am I remembering that correctly?
Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, currently the UDC will allow you to
do those improvements in phasing. But, you're correct, if it was a large commercial
development and it was one lot it would have to happen -- all the landscaping would
happen with the commercial development. But because this is a residential
development in phasing, the UDC does allow that to happen that way.
Zaremba: Great. Thank you.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: I have a question, Scott. You're also requesting that the railroad trail that --
the common lot that's there to wait on doing any landscaping until phase three is
started, is that --
Noriyuki: Yes, would like to do it on a phase specific basis.
Hoaglun: Okay. But the portion of -- in phase two when we talk about the pathway
along the waterway --
Noriyuki: We will complete that during the face.
Meridian City Council
September 1 B, 2012
Page 15 of 48
Hoaglun: Okay. That will be the -- during the portion that's in phase one would be
completed and when you go to phase two that would be completed?
Noriyuki: That is correct.
Hoaglun: Okay.
De Weerd: Would you be willing on that railroad end to put in there a condition if the
pathway were to come sooner, then, phase III, but you would put it in at that time?
Hoaglun: I'm forever the optimist.
Noriyuki: No. And I appreciate that. That's just -- I have got to contemplate the
finances and the extent of it. I want to say that I'm supportive of that transpiring. Would
the City of Meridian be willing to do a cost sharing if that came through at such time?
Because my understanding was we provide the common lot, we will provide the
maintenance of it, we provide the -- the easement, if you will, and the opportunity for the
city. If the city came up with the funds that we would work with you. It would save us all
money, I would be willing to do that.
De Weerd:. I can't answer on that in that regard.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: Question, Scott, and this is kind of a crystal ball question, you have to gaze in
and try your best, but are these phases -- what do you anticipate the length of time from
when to --and, like I said, this is a crystal ball question.
Noriyuki: Well, first of all, my crystal ball is broken after the last four years. But
indicators are positive right now and I think that we are all -- we are all optimistic that
permits are being pulled and projects are coming forward. I think it's an attractive
project and I anticipate it will go as quickly as the market will allow, but I can't put a
number to it, I'm sorry.
Hoaglun: No. Madam Mayor and Scott, that's -- that's a fair answer.
Noriyuki: Thank you.
Hoaglun: I didn't know if you had some idea and what you would like to see of course.
The sooner the better, we all want that.
Noriyuki: Absolutely. We are very motivated. That's right.
De Weerd: Further questions from Council? Do you have aturn-in lane?
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page i6 of 48
Noriyuki: We do not. Center turn lane, which is in compliance with ACHD, as well as all
the adjacent development and subdivisions and traffic study requirements. And further
we have substantially reduced density from the prior approval.
Hoaglun: Oh, I had one other question, Madam Mayor and Scott. The extra lot, was
that just because of the reconfiguration in the center area. I mean --
Noriyuki: No. Actually, that was an error in the staff report. There has always been the
104 most recently. That was just an error in the staff report and I wanted to correct it.
Now, what I had done is in the reconfiguration on the center block, I did add a lot, but
that was in an effort to pick up the one that I lost. In the hard rendering here down on
the lower right-hand corner that we are going to provide the water line connection.
Hoaglun: Okay. So, there is no extra lot. That one went to the center, because when I
counted there was one extra and I saw that one disappear and I was trying to figure out
what happened.
Noriyuki: That is exactly right. Yes .
Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, anything further?
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: Just one other. On the discussion of providing a bus stop should VRT
require that, I'm assuming that that would be along Pine, not within the subdivision
somewhere and as you are building a sidewalk it might be easier to make that with a
bus stop ADA compliant, as opposed to adding it later. I'm curious about whether it's
actually economically feasible to delay or to do it all at once.
Noriyuki: We are happy with the condition to provide an easement, but that's an ACHD
identification and the City of Meridian. I have no idea the actual location desired or the
design criteria. Happy to provide the easement. Absolutely.
De Weerd: Okay. Anything further from Council? Thank you, Scott.
This is a public hearing. Is there any member of the public who would like to provide
testimony on this item? If you could, please, state your name and address for the
record.
Meharry: My name is Steve Meharry and I currently live 45 West South Slope in
Emmett, Idaho. I was a bur in your saddle last week I think, because I raised the
concern about whether the road would narrow and whether the setbacks would match
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 17 of 48
Morning Glory One and Morning Glory Two and so I was the one who caused that little
ruckus. Anyway, my concern was because if it was narrowing or if there was a
difference in setback that it would cheapen the neighborhood, it could cause safety
problems with kids on bikes and whatnot and even though I live in Emmett I still own the
property that we built when this was overwhelmed with dairy smells, so that was a ways
back. And we may move back some day. So, anyways, I wanted you to know that
Scott and your committee was not surprised, because my experience with Meridian has
been very positive over the years. So, work through that and that the road would match
Morning Glory One and Two, the landscaping would be the same and that there would
not be a traffic impediment. So that was just for the record he asked me to testify
tonight.
De Weerd: Thank you, Steve.
Meharry: You're welcome.
De Weerd: Do we have anyone else who would like to provide testimony on this item?
Okay. Scott, any final comments?
Noriyuki: Madam Mayor, Council, yes. I did want to clarify -- or maybe apologize that I
didn't have a landscape plan revised today based on the current lot layout of the center
block. I have been working on that for a little over two weeks to try and come up with
something that would work for Public Works and the needed water line connection, as
well as trying to retain our existing lot count. So, it worked best for everybody. I didn't
complete it until last night. So, we are committed to revising the landscape plan in
conformance with the DA and I expect we could have that done inside of a week.
De Weerd: Okay. Pete or Bill, does that mean -- do you need that for the approval of
the preliminary plat?
Friedman: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, you can just condition it that they
submit it then -- you know, in fact, they could submit it prior to approval of the final plat,
actually.
De Weerd: We appreciate your true confession on the record.
Noriyuki: Thank you. Any other questions?
De Weerd: No. Thank you so much.
Noriyuki: Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Council, if you don't need any further information I would entertain a
motion to close these two public hearings.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 18 of 48
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: I move that we close the public hearing on PP 12-005 and MDA 12-002.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 8-A and B.
All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor, I have a quick question for staff and, then, I want to be sure
that 104 lots is the correct number and that -- is that something we need to change or is
that something that is -- is set? I mean do we need to include that in our motion -- okay.
We do need to include that in our motion. Okay.
Friedman: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Hoaglun, that's correct.
They are requesting that as a modification to the development agreement. I would
include that in there. I would also, if I could get permission, take this opportunity to offer
a couple more comments for your consideration. Depending on how the Council votes
on the request to phase the sidewalk along Pine Street, Public Works again has
indicated that -- as Bill referenced, that having street lighting along the sidewalk there is
paramount in terms of maintaining public safety, particularly during the darker times of
the year. So, whether it's the Council's desire to see that sidewalk go in in its entirety at
once or in phases as requested, we would simply recommend that however it is
developed that it include the appropriate street lighting consistent with the Public Works
standards. And, then, with regard to the bus stop, the only thought that came to mind --
it's very generous of them to provide the easement. I'm just wondering if it's well past
phase three when the need arises and we only have a homeowners association, no
developer out there, who will actually construct the bus stop. So, perhaps it's worth
having a consultation with VRT and ACHD in terms of the phasing and the construction
of that bus stop. So, I offer that for Council's consideration.
De Weerd: Well, Pete, it seems like I recall the answer being we will get the easement,
but building it was not part of the plan.
Friedman: That's correct. That's correct. I just -- again, I was thinking down the line. If
VRT is willing to build it when the time comes, then, that would be great. So, yeah, we
will stick with that -- that requirement.
De Weerd: I guess just a question. If the lighting is part of that sidewalk connection
how would they get the electricity to that? Do they run it through the right of way?
Friedman: I'm going to refer to Warren on this one.
Meridian City Council
September 16, 2012
Page 19 of 48
Stewart: Typically there is a main connection off of the power grid to a transformer,
then, there is some power lines that run down right of way or right off of the edge of the
right of way to each one of the light poles.
De Weerd: I wish we would have had this conversation before we closed the public
hearing, so the applicant could respond.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor, I would request that we reopen the public hearing on both --
Zaremba: Second agrees.
Hoaglun: -- PP 12-005 and MDA 12-002 we can address this issue.
De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to reopen the public hearing on Items
8-A and B. All those in favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
De Weerd: Sorry about that, Scott. We thought your business was done.
Noriyuki: Perfectly fine.. I anticipated it. We are willing to put, the lights in, because we
recognize both the sidewalks and the lights are a safety issue and that's a legitimate
concern that would go beyond the typical phasing requirements or expectations of the
building subdivisions. We will do that. We just ask that we have the lateral with the
landscaping and the other improvements that I have requested specific to phase three.
De Weerd: Any further questions from the Council or anything from staff?
Stewart: None from me. That will work for us.
De Weerd: Okay. Very good. Thank you.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: I will once again request we close the public hearing on PP 12-005 and MDA
12-002.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on these two
items. All those in favor say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Meridian City Council
September 18,2012
Page 20 of 48
Hoaglun: And, Madam Mayor, I just want to --
Zaremba: Madam Mayor, I would just comment. During the period between when we
closed it and reopened it nobody left the room. So, anybody who had come to the
meeting had the opportunity to know that we reopened the public hearing. I just wanted
to put that on the record.
De Weerd: Thank you. Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: I just want to make sure that we need to include in our motion the 104 lots.
We need to resolve the issue of the sidewalk and landscaping and include lighting,
which the applicant has agreed to. We need to address the issue of what type of
sidewalk will be around the irrigation box or over the irrigation box requiring the irrigation
box or allowing temporary paving. Landscaping along the southern common lot,
whether they be installed right away or with phase three. And I understand that the bus
stop is no longer an issue and, staff, am I missing something else? I don't believe so.
Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, you are not. I think you have
covered everything.
Hoaglun: Okay. Great. Thank you. Well, Madam Mayor, let me make a motion and
see if this flies. We can have discussion on this of course. I would -- and I guess I need
to ask Mr. Nary -- I can do both the PP and MDA in the same motion or do you want --
no, Igot to do it separately, don't I? So, for the preliminary plat, I move approval of
preliminary plat 12-005 and I think all the changes will be in the MDA, unless -- oh, I'm
sorry. No. The preliminary plat we do need the lot changes, correct? So, I would move
approval of PP 12-005 with the 104 lots.
Zaremba: Second.
Hoaglun: And all staff and applicant discussions to be included in the requirements.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Seeing none, Madam
Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
De Weerd: Item 8-B.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 21 of 48
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: I move approval of MDA 12-002 with the proposed changes as requested by
the Planning Department with the exception of allowing sidewalks along Pine Street,
along phase three to be built, but without landscaping, but to include the lighting as
agreed to by the developer. That along the irrigation box that a temporary path for
pavement would be allowed around irrigation box until such time phase three begins its
construction and that they are not required to install landscaping on the southern
boundary -- the southern common lot until phase three is begun. And I think, going
through my notes here, I think that's all I have for now. So, that's my motion, Madam
Mayor.
Zaremba: Do we need to repeat the change in the number of lots for the MDA?
Hoaglun: I can just in case. And will be 104 lots for this approval.
Zaremba: Second agrees. Second I mean.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion?
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor, just quickly. Appreciate the developer agreeing to the
sidewalk and to the lighting. We have had other developments where we have done the
same thing where they are still empty fields, no landscaping, but we do have the
sidewalks and lighting and that's the main thing that had the access for the kids. It looks
like we have a significant buffer on that temporary box and that is an expensive
proposition and I see as the phases go that will be taken care of in a proper manner. I
do appreciate the common lot that the developer is willing to have on the southern
border along our railway. I'm glad he recognizes that this is an amenity that could be
very beneficial to his development when the time comes, but because that is far off in
the future and there really won't be any use of that lot until other connections are going
to be made, I can see we can wait on that until phase three, but do appreciate that --
that vision that you have, along with the city and the Mayor has been promoting to -- to
reserve some land along that railway for rail to trails, however you want to phase that --
phrase that. So, do appreciate that and I think we can wait on the landscaping until
phase three as well. So, that's why I made the motion that I did and I think it's a good
development and hope it all works out.
Zaremba: Madam --
De Weerd: But it's certainly better than the dirt piles and the weeds that are out there
today. Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: The discussion on the landscape -- and I -- or the -- Councilman Hoaglun's
remarks. But staff asked if we also make a comment that the landscape plan needs to
be prior to the final plat. Are we --
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 22 of 48
Hoaglun: You know, Madam Mayor and Councilman Zaremba, if you don't mind, I could
amend my motion. I had that in my notes and I couldn't read my notes, because I wrote
too fast. But I do have down and meant to include in my motion that the landscape plan
be submitted and agreed to before the final plat is approved, so --
Zaremba: Second agrees with that addition.
Hoaglun: Okay. So, that --did mean to include that. Thank you, Councilman Zaremba.
De Weerd: Thank you for those comments and corrections. Anything further from
Council? Madam Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
C. Public Hearing: CPAM 12-003 Olson & Bush by Ronald W. Van
Auker Located at 2950 E. Franklin Road Request: Amend the,
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Designation on
5.66 +/- Acres of Land From Commercial to Industrial
D. Public Hearing: AZ 12-003 Olson & Bush by Ronald Van Auker
Located at 2950 E. Franklin Road Request: Annexation and
Zoning a Total of 7.2 Acres of Land to the C-G (1.41 Acres) and
I-L (5.78 Acres) Zoning Districts
De Weerd: Again, thank you. Okay. Item 8-C and D are public hearings on CPAM
12-003 and AZ 12-003. I will open these two public hearings will staff comments.
Watters: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The next two
applications before you are a request for Comprehensive Plan map amendment and an
annexation and zoning request. This site consists of 6.84 acres of land. Is currently
zoned RUT in Ada County and is located at 2950 East Franklin Road. The applicant
requests an amendment to the future land use map contained in the Comprehensive
Plan to change the land use designation on 5.66 acres of land from commercial to
industrial. Currently the applicant requests annexation and zoning of 1.41 acres of land
to the C-G zoning district. And 5.78 acres to the I-L zoning district consistent with the
existing and proposed future land use map designations of commercial and industrial for
this site. The applicant plans to replat the portion of Olson and Bush Subdivision No. 2
that lies to the north of this site to include the subject property creating longer light
industrial lots that front on Lanark Street as shown on the proposed concept plan before
you. The portion of the site that fronts on Franklin Road is proposed to be zoned
commercial. This piece right here on the corner. There is an existing home on that
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 23 of 48
property to be zoned C-G that is proposed to remain as such until the property
redevelops in the future. The Commission recommended approval of the two
applications. Ron Van Auker, Jr., testified in favor. There was no opposition or
commenting. Written testimony was received from Brad Miller in response to the staff
report. He requested that the existing home be allowed to continue using the well and
sewer until such time as either the well or septic fails or residential use of the property is
discontinued and the property redevelops. The Commission -- key items discussed was
the time of the existing home to hook up to city water and sewer service and the
Commission recommended the existing home not be required to hook up to city water
and sewer service until such time as the property redevelops or the system fails. There
was no written testimony received since the Commission hearing and the only
outstanding issue for Council is whether to follow the Commission's recommendation on
the timing for the existing home to hook up to city services. Staff will stand for any
questions Council may have.
De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: Would you go back to what was probably the first slide of the little broader
area view of what we are looking at? What I'm trying to orient myself to -- is there a
significant grade change between the piece that faces Franklin and the part that's trying
to be changed?
Wafters: Yes, there is.
Zaremba: Okay. So there is a natural separation of that?
Waters: Yes . Yeah. It makes sense in this case.
Zaremba: I thought so. That's it for me.
De Weerd: Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward. Before I chastise you for
taking out a very valued grape growing area, you know, if you will, please, state your
name and address for the record.
Miller: My name is Brad Miller, 3084 East Lanark in Meridian.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Miller: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, thank you for hearing this. This is
unique property. It's oddly configured and so we looked at it and we figured the best
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 24 of 48
thing to do because of the grade change is to try to combine with the light industrial lots
down below. There is also on our southern border there there is an irrigation ditch that
runs along there, so it's a natural break right there. So, it doesn't make any sense to
connect it to the properties on Franklin Road and so we thought that we would go ahead
and see if we could change the land use designation and combine them with the lots
down below.
De Weerd: Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor, Brad, can a city ever have too much industrial lots?
Miller: I don't think so. I don't think we have enough and it's with great disappointment
that I say that I agree with everything in the staff report, so I usually like to have things
to argue about, but in this case I don't.
De Weerd: Wow. That's a red banner day.
Hoaglun: We have that on the recording, don't we, Mayor.
De Weerd: We do.
Miller: Thank you very much.
De Weerd: Thank you. This is a public hearing on Items 8-C and D. Is there any
member of the public who would like to testify on these items? Okay. Council?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move we close public hearings on CPAM 12-003 and AZ 12-003.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearings on items 8-C and
D. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve CPAM 12-003 and include all staff and applicant comments.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 25 of 48
Hoaglun: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-C. If there is no
discussion, Madam Clerk, roll call, please.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
De Weerd: Item 8-D.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve AZ 12-003 with all staff and applicant comments.
Hoaglun: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-D. Madam Clerk, roll call,
please.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
E. Public Hearing: CPAM 12-002 Paramount East by Brighton
Development Located West Side of Meridian Road, Between
W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road Request: Amendment
to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to Change
the Land Use Designation on Approximately 12.90 Acres of
Land from Office to Medium Density Residential (MDR)
F. Public Hearing: RZ 12-001 Paramount East by Brighton
Development Located West Side of Meridian Road, Between
W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road Request: Rezone of
12.47 Acres of Land from the L-O (Limited Office) Zone to the
R-8 (Medium Density Residential) Zone
G. Public Hearing: PP 12-002 Paramount East by Brighton
Development Located West Side of Meridian Road, Between
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 26 of 48
W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road Request: Preliminary
Plat Approval of 46 Residential Lots and Six (6) Common Lots
on 12.90 Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone
De Weerd: Items 8-E, F and G are public hearings on CPAM 12-002, RZ 12-001, and
12-002. I will open these three public hearings with staff comments.
Parsons: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Next project before you
this evening is Paramount East. The applicant is proposing a Comprehensive Plan map
amendment from office to medium density residential, a rezone from L-O zone to the
R-8 zone and, of course, a preliminary plat consisting of 46 residential lots. This is
really an extension of the existing residential subdivision constructed in Paramount
Subdivision. The project is located on the west side of Meridian Road in between West
Producer Driver and East McMillan Road. Again, here are the -- here is the proposed
map changes before you this evening. You can see the one on the left-hand side
shows how much office is -- is proposed to change. It's approximately 12.9 acres. In
2003 this project was annexed and zoned into the city as part of the Paramount
Subdivision planned development and it was approved for office uses as a use
exception with that PD. If the change is proposed by Council this evening, we are
looking at going at R-8 to the zone, which is consistent with the surrounding residential
properties in the area. Here is the proposed plat that the applicant is proposing this
evening. A portion of the office lots is developed with a church and that happened in
2009, I believe, and, then, to the west of that is the remaining 12.9 acres that is to
change to single familiar residential development on the left-hand side is the concept
plan that the applicant has presented show you how the lots would conform and meld in
with existing subdivision to the west and, then, would mention to Council that all the lots
do comport to the R-8 standards. Because this was part of the planned development
back in the day, there are some modified setbacks that were approved with that PD as
well. The applicant is proposing to extend several stub streets and construct a new
collector street along the southern boundary, which is consistent with both their planned
development in 2003 and also with ACHD'S master street map. Here is the approved --
or the proposed landscape plan before you this evening. Open space for this
subdivision is at 17.4 percent. A majority of that is really parkways along the streets
and, then, center medians. Because this is an extension of the Paramount Subdivision,
anyone that lives in the subdivision will have rights to the constructed amenities that
were built with earlier phases. Here are the elevations that the applicant is proposing.
It is a sample. They submitted quite a bit more with the application, but I thought this
would give Council an idea of what they are proposing. Again, the mix of materials are
pretty consistent with what's in the adjacent subdivisions. Also I would mention to
Council that this property is subject to the original development agreement and was
approved in 2003. At some future time staff anticipates the applicant coming back and
amending that DA of -- in the recorded development agreement there is a restriction on
the number of buildable lots and the amount of square footage on office uses that can
occur within a development. So, they have been conditioned to come back and do that
at some date. At the Commission --during the Commission hearing it was approved on
August 16th. Speaking in favor was Mike Wardle. No one commented in opposition.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 27 of 48
There was a gentleman that stood up. His name was James Mitchell. He wanted to
discuss the R-40 zones property, because that was not part of the application. It had no
relevance on this application. That zoning is currently in place. Key changes to stafFs
recommendation. The Commission made none. And, then, the written testimony since
the Commission hearing came from Mike Wardle. He was in agreement with the
Commission's recommendations. So, outstanding issues before you this evening --
there aren't any. And, again, staff will stand for any questions you have.
De Weerd: Thank you, Bill. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Okay.
Wardle: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation,
12601 West Explorer Drive in Boise. Just a simple statement and, then, respond to any
questions you might have. This is -- these applications really reflect the momentum for
the residential component of Paramount. You have seen a lot of phases coming
through this year and we have three actually under construction right now, phases 19,
20 and 21, and we will be back with some more in the early spring of next year,
assuming that the crystal balls get pieced together and we know that there is still
something happening and it appears that there will be. We would just note that there
are office space parcels on the west side of the project within the section and we will be
coming forward shortly with some additional platting of the commercial property at the
northeast corner of Linder and McMillan and will have some office space in it as well.
So, we are still dealing with office opportunities, but we also need to respond to the
demands for the residential component, so the changes as proposed we ask for your
concurrence and approval and would be happy to answer your questions.
De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions? Okay. Thank you.
Wardle: Thank you.
De Weerd: I did have one person signed up to testify. Ralph Chappell. Okay. I will call
on you for the next one. I won't say you signed up on the wrong sheet. This is a public
hearing. Is there anyone who would like to provide testimony on this item? Seeing
none, any further staff comments? Anything further from the applicant? City Council?
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: I move we close the public hearing including CPAM 12-002, RZ 12-001 and
PP 12-002.
Hoaglun: Second.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 28 of 48
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearings to Items 8-E, F
and G. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: I move that we approve CPAM 12-002 with all staff and applicant comments.
Hoaglun: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-E. Madam Clerk, roll call,
please.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
De Weerd: Item 8-F.
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: I move we approve RZ 12-001 again with staff and applicant comments.
Hoaglun: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-F. If there is no
discussion, Madam Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 29 of 48
Zaremba: I do have a question I need to ask of staff before this one.
De Weerd: Okay.
Zaremba: Tell me again -- you wanted something about changing the -- since this
changing from an L-O to a residential, you said there were some other paperwork you
needed before we could get to the preliminary plat. Am I remembering that correctly?
No?
Friedman: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Zaremba, I believe
what Bill was referencing is right now under the current development agreement there is
a feeling, if you will, on residential lots, as well as on the amount of commercial use and
so as they start creeping up towards that number of -- towards that ceiling on the
number of residential lots, it's more of a really early notice that we will likely have to
entertain a development agreement modification to raise the ceiling, if you will.
Zaremba: Okay. So, this one doesn't push them over, but they need to be aware that
that may happen at some time.
Friedman: Correct.
Zaremba: Thank you. In that case, with no further adieu, I move that we approve
PP 12-002 with staff and applicant comments.
Hoaglun: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second without further adieu. Any discussion?
Madam Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
H. Public Hearing: CPAM 12-001 TM Crossing by Brighton
Investments LLC, Steven Smith and CRS10 Located Northeast
Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Request: Amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to Change the
Land Use Designation on 75.5 Acres of Land from LC (Lifestyle
Center), MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) and HDE
(High Density Employment) to Commercial
I. Public Hearing: AZ 12-005 TM Crossing by Brighton
Investments, LLC, Steven Smith and CRS10 Located Northeast
Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Request: Annexation and
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 30 of 48
Zoning of 89.22 Acres of Land from the RUT Zoning District to
the C-G (General Retail & Service Commercial) Zoning District
J. Public Hearing: PP 12-003 TM Crossing by Brighton
Investments, LLC, Steven Smith and CRS10 Located Northeast
Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Request: Preliminary Plat
Approval of 50 Commercial Building Lots and Four (4)
Common/Other Lots on 75.5 Acres of Land
De Weerd: The next items are 8-H and I and J. I will open the public hearings on
CPAM 12-001, AZ 12-005, and PP 12-003 with staff comments.
Wafters: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The next applications
before you are a request for a Comprehensive Plan map amendment, a rezone, and a
preliminary plat. This site consists of 75.5 acres of land. Is currently zoned RUT in Ada
County and is located on the northeast corner of Interstate 84 and South Ten Mile
Road. The applicant requests an amendment to the future land use map contained in
the Ten Mile interchange specific area plan to change the land use designation on a
total of 75.5 acres of land from a lifestyle center, which consisted of 30.45 acres of the
site, medium high density residential, which consisted of 8.5 acres of the site, high
density employment, which consisted of 39.75 acres, all to commercial. Because 176
acres of mixed employment uses are planned to the south of I-84 and 76-acres of high
density employment uses are planned to the west of Ten Mile Road and lifestyle center
is currently constructed at Fairview and Eagle, the Commission was of the opinion a
commercial designation may be appropriate for this property, as long as the property
develops in accord with the design elements of the Ten Mile plan. The next request is
for an annexation and zoning of 89.22 acres of land, with a C-G zoning district,
consistent with the proposed future land use map designation of commercial. A
conceptual development plan was submitted that depicts future building locations,
parking, streets and drive aisles. Sample building elevations were also submitted.
Because the zoning compatibility matrix in the Ten Mile plan with the C-G zoning district
as a zoning choice for the existing lifestyle center and high density employment
designated areas, as well as the proposed commercial designation, the Commission
recommends approval of the requested zoning. Hours of operation for businesses in
the C-G district that are adjacent to residential uses are limited from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00
p.m. This will apply to businesses along the east boundary of the site adjacent to
Primrose Subdivision. As a provision of annexation staff is recommending a
development agreement with the provisions listed in Exhibit B of the staff report. A
preliminary plat consisting of 50 commercial building lots and four common and other
lots was also submitted. The preliminary plat is proposed to develop in two phases.
Access is proposed by an off-site access to Ten Mile Road north of the site. You can
see here. No other access is available to the site at this time. ACHD policy restricts the
amount of traffic allowed on a collector street with only one public street access in and
out of the site to 3,000 vehicle trips per day. Additionally, the fire department requires
commercial buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000
square feet to be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus roads.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 31 of 48
Therefore, development will be limited until secondary access can be provided. The
transportation system map you see here on the left-hand corner contained in the Ten
Mile plan depicts an off-site access to Ten Mile Road north of the site, which runs south
to the roundabout at the north boundary of the site. From there a collector street is
shown along the north boundary of the site to the east and also to the south and back to
the west under the Ten Mile ramp. From the roundabout the street section map shows
two lane streets as appropriate for this site. After working with the applicant and ACHD
the applicant is now proposing a roundabout at the north boundary of the site as you
can see here with four lane streets and a median turn lane throughout the site, except
for the leg that runs to the west under the Ten Mile ramp, which is a two lane street
consistent with the street section map. A four lane with a median turn lane is an option
for street layout in the Ten Mile area. A street of this size is meant to serve as an
arterial with access restricted to collectors. Because of the high volume of traffic that is
likely to be generated from the proposed development, the Commission is of the opinion
the proposed streets are appropriate in this case. the Perdham Drain currently bisects
this site from the southeast corner to the northwest corner. You can see it here on this
aerial map. The Taylor Drain connects to the Perdham Drain from the south here. The
Perdham Drain is proposed to be relocated along the southern and western boundary of
the site. Both of these existing -- both of these existing easements are proposed to be
vacated. Landscape street buffers and buffers to residential uses are proposed on the
landscape plan in accord with UDC standards. The Commission recommended
approval of the subject applications at their August 16th public hearing. Mike Wardle
testified in favor. No one testified in opposition or commented. Mike Wardle did submit
written testimony in response to the staff report. Key issues of discussion by the
Commission was modifying the future land use map to allow for commercial, rather than
mixed us development in this area. The Commission did make some changes at the
recommendation of staff to the development agreement. Those provisions can be seen
in Exhibit B of the staff report. Outstanding issue for City Council. The applicant
requests a waiver from City Council to UDC 11-3A-6A3A, which requires the Perdham
Drain to be covered due to its large capacity. Council may waive this requirement if it
finds that the public purpose requiring such will not be served and public safety can be
preserved in order to waive the requirement or for large capacity facilities. Written
testimony has been received since the Commission hearing from Marshime Shekari, the
property owner directly to the north, Treasure Valley Investments. He requests an
alternative roundabout design that is more centrally located on the property to the north
be added as an option in the development agreement. This is the design here before
you. The cross-hatched area is what he is proposing. This is the current right of way
that's been dedicated. He also requests screening of roof top mechanical equipment,
loading docks, refuse and storage areas and a heightened level of architectural
emphasis on the rear walls of the buildings facing his property. And staff would just
comment that this will be taken care of with the design review process with certificate of
zoning compliance. Mike Wardle submitted written testimony prior to Council hearing
requesting that development agreement provisions 1.1.2E be modified as follows: A
welcome to Meridian sign shall be constructed north of the I-84 off ramp to Ten Mile
Road. The developer shall coordinate the funding, design, and location of the signs
with city planning staff and the commercial development properties along Ten Mile
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 32 of 48
Road north to Franklin Road. In the same spirit, in lieu of the applicant's request staff
recommends the following language: Prior to issuance of the first certificate of
occupancy within the site the developer shall submit a surety to the City of Meridian for
half the cost of a welcome to Meridian sign to be placed at the intersection of South Ten
Mile Road and South Smithfield Drive on the property to the north. Developer shall
coordinate the design and location of the sign with city planning staff. The intent being
for the property owner to the north to pay for the remaining portion of the site at the time
of development of that parcel and construct the sign at that time. If the referenced
property to the north is not developed within five years the surety shall be returned to
the developer and the developer shall have no further obligation pertaining to the sign.
Staff will stand for any questions Council may have.
De Weerd: Council, any questions at this point?
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: The thought occurred to me and the -- one of the questions by the property
owner to the north about shielding and appearances and backs of buildings and loading
docks and stuff, would it also be true -- ,anybody on the interstate or even the first
portion of Ten Mile Road is significantly elevated above this property and would be
looking down on the tops of the buildings probably or at least level with the tops of the
buildings and see over -- or in the left a very large building. It would be wonderful if that
was a Costco, but that's not the issue for the evening. But that building in particular
would be very visible from almost above it and the rear of it and just would design
review take care of those issues as well, somebody from an elevated perspective
looking down or do we need to discuss that?
Friedman: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Zaremba, that's a
very good question. Generally when we talk about the screening it's, you know, sort of
from the street level eye up and, obviously, as you correctly pointed out, we have a
signature grade difference there, so chances are they may be looking down on some of
those as they go down there. We would work with the -- our design guidelines don't
really kind of address that overhead view, but, you know, we would challenge the
developer and the builder to come up with something that could at least ameliorate
some of those impacts, recognizing that you're just not going to be able to do it when
you're that high above the building. Certain things might be able to be incorporated
actually into buildings, it just depends how they are designed. So, you know, that's a
future design challenge that we need take care of, because normally we do -- we do get
that sort of in the everyday design of our buildings and, again, trying going to set view
from the street sidewalk level that we mostly address.
Zaremba: Thanks.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor, I did have a question for staff.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 33 of 48
De Weerd: Yes.
Hoaglun: And that was on the -- along the east boundary with those businesses that
abut the residential properties, that is restricted to closing-opening 6:00 to 11:00. Is it
just those four buildings we see on the concept plan? There is one that's inset quite a
bit, but is it all the buildings along the east boundary that are restricted to that time?
Wafters: Madam Mayor, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilmen, it would be all of those
buildings that are adjacent to that east boundary. The one that's inset probably not so
much, but the other three and the end tenant in that larger building would be subject to
those restricted hours.
Hoaglun: Okay. So, how far in does it make a difference? Distance does make a
difference in this case.
Wafters: Yes.
Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Anything ,further at this point? Okay.. Would the applicant like to
make comment? The big gun is here.
Turnbull: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Mike and I are splitting duties
tonight.
De Weerd: Nice to have you here. If you will, please, state your name and address for
the record.
Turnbull: David Turnbull, 12601 West Explorer Drive, Boise, Idaho. I'll start by saying
it's nice to feel like a developer again. I remember Anna Canning calling me about this
time of the year in '08 or '09 and saying, you know, if you get a final plat in you could be
the only one for the year and so this year I think we are platting Spurwing Greens Two,
Three and Four and Paramount 18, 19, 20 and 21. So, things are happening again and
it feels better and, you know, there is a new vibe out there. I want to start by
acknowledging -- well, first thanking the staff for their presentation. I mentioned to Pete
tonight's my wife's 50th birthday, so I said if you could keep it short we -- I'd like to get
home as early as possible. But we also appreciate the work the staff's put into this.
This has been a -- quite an extensive two year planning process that we have been
going through on this property. Also I want to acknowledge the team that we have here.
We have had three engineers firms, HDR, Horacks, and Keller working on this project in
various capacities, along with The Land Group, and here with us tonight, of course, in
addition to Mike Wardle we have Matt Smith and Craig Hilbig from our company. So,
like I said, this has been a two year planning effort. We have had to consider things like
access and circulation. We have had to deal with 404 permits with the Corps of
Engineers and Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. We have looked at buildings of
Meridian Cily Council
September 18, 2012
Page 34 of 48
potential development layouts, we have visited numerous out-of-state developments to
see what's working and what's not working and our priority has always been to create
something that's going to be a positive addition to the city and at the same time having
the maximum chance for success. It takes into consideration unique features and
location of this area and I just want to stress, as I think Sonya has mentioned, our
commitment to the design standards included in the Ten Mile interchange specific area
plan, I think that those architectural elements are -- are the thing that's going to make
this a nice addition to the city. We concur with the staff report and their analysis and the
Planning and Zooming Commission's recommendations. They asked us to make some
revisions and we have done those. Mike, I don't know if you booted up the -- the
updated plan here that we submitted after the Commission hearing, but -- do you know
how to work this or -- Sonya, do you have that one, the one that we submitted? Okay.
Back one. There we go. Okay. So, this includes the roundabout. Now, you know,
there is a lot of things that changed between the time that the plan was conceived and
the actual engineering for the interchange was done. The elevation, the grade coming
over that interchange was extended for an underpass going under the road where you
can see the primary access was moved significantly to the north, which kind of skews
the road coming in. We had numerous discussions with Mr. Shekari, vve are happy to
have further discussions, but as of the time we made this application we couldn't get
any concurrence with him, so we are happy to reengage, but needing to move forward
we have a plan. that we think we would work through with ACHD with city, staff and,
then, through your Planning Commission and we think that it represents this type of
quality that this development needs. We had significant neighborhood involvement
with primarily people to the east, the Primrose neighborhood. We had a general
neighborhood meeting inviting all the surrounding property owners and that was held at
the Ten Mile Christian Church there at Ten Mile and Franklin. We have -- and that was
on May 31st. And at Mike Wardle's instigation and also the request of the Primrose
neighbors, we had a meeting in the Atwood home that backs up to the -- to our eastern
boundary where a significant number of the neighbors came out and the major points of
discussion was a buffer on the easterly boundary which we have addressed and I think
you have in the application a section that shows a significant landscaping buffer that
would be in place on the eastern property when we get to phase two. The status of
Verbena -- now that's a right of way -- Verbena is a street that comes through their
neighborhood and there is a right of way that extends through to our property. Of
course, you know, as I can attest on the street I live on if I called a pizza company and
asked them to deliver to my address oftentimes they come through a neighborhood that
is to the east of me and they can't get through and so these neighbors were, obviously,
concerned about anybody wanting to get to a business on Verbena -- and I guess I
should back up. The street naming committee requested that the -- our east-west
street, because it's in general alignment, be made Verbena and that caused a great
deal of heartburn for those neighbors. So, we submitted -- resubmitted for a waiver of
that and have it tentatively approved the name of Perdham for that street and we would
ask for the City Council's concurrence on that. That would help quell the concerns of
the neighbors to the east. The other points of discussion with them was their own
desire to have any multi-family relocated so that it wasn't abutting their property and we
have taken care of those concerns. Mike Wardle has outlined some outstanding issues
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 35 of 48
which I think that the --and Sonya also did pretty well. The first outstanding issue is the
waiver of UDC 11-3A-6A.3A for the relocation of the Perdham Drain in an open facility.
It's a rather large facility that drains that, you know, entire area. And the second
condition on the welcome sign -- we are happy to participate in that, by the way, just the
way the condition was read there is no physical place on our property where that could
be put. You know, the first -- the lowest location would be right in an ITD storm drain,
so there is really no physical way for us to do that. We are happy to participate in the
cost and Mike's suggested language back to Sonya was that property owners on both
the east and west side of Ten Mile participate. We are willing to work that out with staff
or, you know, abide by whatever they decide there. So, in conclusion, I think that we
have met the -- the conditions that staff has recommended that Planning and Zoning
Commission has recommended and we ask for your concurrence and approval on our
three applications tonight. And I will stand for any questions or wait until later if you'd
like to call me back up.
De Weerd: Thank you. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor. Question, David, on --
De Weerd: Uh-huh.
Hoaglun: -- staff had followed up with different language -- a little bit different than what
Mike had submitted on the sign. Does that work for you guys?
Turnbull: Yeah. My only suggestion on staff language was kind of a hybrid between
what Mike submitted and what Sonya just read was that our feeling was that the
property owners on the east and west side of the road should be participants in that
cost. The way Sonya's read I think it's just the properties on the west side of the road.
So, that was my only comment on that.
Hoaglun: And I think I'd like to hear from
folks on the other side would participate,
doing anything right now, is that --
staff. I think the intent was probably that the
but you can't condition someone who is not
Watters: Exactly. Mayor, Councilman Hoaglun, Councilmen, the ship's already kind of
sailed on the west side of the road. We have development agreements in place and
they did not include that provision. So, that's the reason. So, staff's intent was for TM
Crossing and Mr. Shekari's property to pay for this sign.
Turnbull: That's a true latecomer's agreement. We are fine with that. I'm not going to
make a big issue of that. I understand where you are on that.
Hoaglun: Okay. I had another question and that goes back to the roadway. One of the
things that Tonya -- Sonya had mentioned was, you know, the secondary access --
Meridian Cily Council
September 18, 2012
Page 36 of 48
development be limited until secondary access can be provided. What is -- is that
timing going to work out for secondary access? I mean that is important to our fire
department and --
Turnbull: Yeah. We have probably two or three different options that we can explore.
Hoaglun: And then --
Turnbull: And we have some similar discussions to do with the fire department as well,
so --
Hoaglun: Okay.
Turnbull: We will work through those issues as they come about.
Hoaglun: And Madam Mayor and David, to follow up on the traffic issue, it -- you know,
commercial sites can generate high volumes of traffic and I was looking at the plan, are
there going to be turn lanes as you're coming around and wanting to access a business
-- and I couldn't tell from that -- that view -- particular view we were looking at -- are
there turn lanes that are going to be -- I would think you would want that to flow, but I
didn't -- I didn't really -- couldn't tell from. the view we were looking at.
Turnbull: Yes, Madam Mayor, Councilman Hoaglun, those will be designed into the
final road design.
Hoaglun: I kind of figured that. You guys have done this a time or two, so -- but you
never know what -- what -- how things move forward. My last question I have regarding
the Perdham drain -- and let's -- we are dealing with Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District
on this particular one?
Turnbull: Yes .
Hoaglun: And they are okay with keeping that open?
Turnbull: Yes.
Hoaglun: Okay. Then what will the landscaping be for -- Madam Mayor and David, for
this area? Will that be landscaped? Are you just going to buffer that, so between the
freeway there will be the open drain and their easements and rights of way and, then,
you will have landscaping or is that landscape of some sort?
Turnbull: Well, we have a slide that depicts that right there. Oops. It keeps jumping
around. Okay. As you can see on the -- on the left-hand side of the freeway side,
which would be 20 foot access road and, then, we would plant -- and this is things we
have all discussed with Nampa-Meridian. On the -- on the south side they want that
planted in dry land seed, grass, to stabilize the bank, but they don't particularly want to
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 37 of 48
have any here, but that's going to be maintenance side. On the northern side of that we
would put a nonfescue grass and, then, we would -- we have made arrangements for
planter beds that could encroach into the easement to a certain degree and, then, we
have added another tree buffer on the north side of that. So, it's a fairly wide and
significant landscape buffer.
Hoaglun: Okay. Thank you.
De Weerd: Okay. Any further questions? Okay. Thank you. Okay. I had one person
signed up. Ralph Chappell. If you will, please, state your name and address for the
record.
Chappell: Ralph Chappell. 1899 South Swan Avenue, Meridian.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Chappell: And I think I saw the error of my ways. I saw 12-001 and I signed up on the
wrong sheet. On this particular item here I can remember way back when you were first
doing this Ten Mile thing you were saying you wanted this to be like a model showplace
for Meridian coming in and you were going to have housing down here and no service
stations and how we are going to change this thing from a lifestyle center to a -- what,
commercial? Why do we want to make a change? Why not just go with our
Comprehensive Plan? Why this change? That's all I have got. I just don't want it to
have an interchange like we have every other place, like go to Boise, everything is the
same. It's all commercial. So, thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you, Ralph.
Chappell: Next time I will read all the directions.
De Weerd: This is a public hearing. Is there anyone else -- yes, sir. Good evening,
Eric. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record.
Davis: Good evening, Mayor -- Madam Mayor and Council. Eric Davis, Retail West
Properties, 199 North Capital, Boise. And I represent Marseme Shekari who has the
property to the north. And I think you will remember -- maybe it's -- somebody does
remember ten years ago here with -- trying to get the interchange started and my client
was Eastborn Investments and we did a lot of things together, studies and plans and
ultimately Eastborn sold the property to Brighton and I applaud these guys for what they
have pulled together and their marketing efforts and their planning and, you know, I met
Marseme in that capacity when he was a neighbor of ours and we went on for, you
know, a year and a half and sold out and, then, Merzem would come to my office maybe
once a year, maybe every six months he would come walking in and I'd see him at an
ICSC conferences in Las Vegas and we kept in touch, but didn't have any real --
anything to do with this project until about two weeks ago he walked in and he had a
planning package and, you know, he says, Eric, what do I do and he tells me that he's
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 38 of 48
been having health problems, his daughter had health problems, so I took it and looked
at the package and I said you have got the greatest thing going, you're neighbors are
doing a great job and you have got access now off of -- you know, right in your front
door. But his -- his big -- I guess if he had a regret is that he didn't pursue the -- that
access with Brighton as he you probably should have and, you know, it's -- you know, I
-- this is the -- the roundabout and I think it was -- you know, he just -- you know, it's all
verbal with me and he said that back in May he was working with Brighton to do this and
in talking with the Brighton folks it was -- Merseme sort of went silent and they had to go
on and do what they have done. So, our purpose and my advice to Merseme is not to
hold up anything. You don't want to throw a rock at this proposal, have it move along,
but have this at least be on the table as an example of a way to maybe improve the
access for everybody in this joint situation. It would require a much more right of way
dedication by Chicory, additional costs, but I -- you know, just my professional opinion is
this would be a better arrangement, that it would definitely depend on the cooperative, a
lot of things can be agreed to. So, better late than never I guess. Apologize for the late
hour and the rest of the issues that we brought up in the letter about the screening just
seems like that's going to be handled, so -- I guess that's the time limit. Is that the --
De Weerd: It is the time limit. Were you --did you have any further comments?
Davis: No. I think iYs -- you know, I talked about this. with ACHD just briefly and they..
were a little bit concerned that Merseme hadn't been vocal and was hard to reach, so --
butthey were appreciative of this. So, I would just like to have it up on the table and as
an option in the future.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Council, any questions?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Eric.
Davis: Thank you.
De Weerd: Is there any further testimony on this item? Wrap up remarks?
Turnbull: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. I'll just make a few
quick responses to Mr. Chappell's testimony. It's not like everything has changed here.
There are some differences. Part of the difference is because of access is moving and
we have had to accommodate that. You know, lifestyle center is a pretty broad
definition. I don't know if there is a definition for what a lifestyle center is. If you take a
look at what Center Cal is doing, they have parts you might consider a lifestyle center
and parts that you wouldn't. I do know that in our travels we figured out what does work
with them and what doesn't. You can even see examples of it here locally. The first
thing that doesn't work with a lifestyle center is an unanchored lifestyle center. We saw
examples of people that put in kind of the Chichi stuff without the traffic generators that
the anchors provide and they just die. They die. We saw a project that we thought was
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 39 of 48
probably the most successful project that we saw and it was beautiful and it seemed to
be doing okay. We met with the -- we wanted to talk to the developer and the leasing
agent on that and we found out that it wasn't so successful after all. It went bankrupt.
And I said what went wrong and he said, well, part of the problem is that they broke
some of the rules. Number one is lifestyle centers, even in the best of circumstances,
have to be a minimum of ten miles apart and we met down in May at ICSC with the --
the real estate representative for Pottery Barn and William Sonoma and he said, you
know, we just don't do second stores a locations like Boise. He says you can go to San
Diego and you will find one Pottery Barn and he says I think maybe we have two
Williams Sonomas and that's, you know, San Diego. So, those are just the realities and
our objective is to adhere to the architectural design standards so you have a real high
quality architectural theme. We programmed in some intersections where we will have
clustered buildings and kind of some, you know, seating courtyard areas. We have got
an area where we will have some kind of an open plaza. We don't know if it's going to
be a fountain park or a, you know, winter skate park. I understand Center Cal is doing
that, so we may not want to do two of those in the valley. But we will work through
those issues and we will come up with architectural themes that will make the city proud
and that will also make this project successful in end kind. It's kind of like people that --
we don't develop golf courses, because generally the second or third owner is the one
that starts making money after the first two have gone broke. We don't intend to go
broke and we want this to be a successful tax revenue generating project for this city
and something that it can be proud of as well. We have retained a lot of the elements --
you know, we have retained the capability to do some, you know. taller office buildings
along the freeway, so that will all be as demand indicates. You know, what I don't want
to do is build a Stevens Henager building that's been sitting there for five years and had
the banner on it that says 12 months free rent, because I can't handle that. So, I
appreciate what Mr. Chappell said. With regard to Eric, Eric has been a real gentleman
in this effort and we are not opposed to opening up discussions with Mr. Shakeri again.
We did that for about nine months and never could get a commitment one way or the
other, so we actually told him or -- you know, early in the spring what -- we have to have
a direction one way or the other and he never could get us an answer and so we will
continue those discussions, but we need to have some certainty that this plan provides,
so we would appreciate approval of this plan as it's presented and if we want to make a
modification we will come back to the city. There is nothing that precludes that we don't
believe, so we will keep that door open and I appreciate Council's forbearance and
would appreciate your approval.
De Weerd: Thank you, David. Any questions that's --
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: I would just ask if you're amenable to thinking about the view of the buildings
from an elevated perspective as opposed to ground level.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 40 of 48
Turnbull: You know, Madam Mayor, Councilman Zaremba, I looked at that myself, you
know, and I have the same concern you do. Now I would point out that as you come
across the interchange there is a fairly significant metalwork screening wall already in
place that blocks a significant amount of view coming right off the interchange. It
probably tapers off as you get closer, but, yeah, we will work with the city. I mean we
can't -- you know, we are not going to put a garden on the top of the roof, but --
De Weerd: Oh, come one, that's green.
Turnbull: Well, you know, maybe if you lease it and --
Zaremba: Be a good place for a dog park.
De Weerd: We probably have some community gardeners who would love to raise food
for the food bank.
Bird: They can just get their checkbook out and buy it.
Turnbull: So -- but we will do the best we can. You know, it is a significant problem, but
there are probably some solutions that we bring the bear.
Zaremba: Thank you.
De Weerd: Anything further from Council? Thank you.
Turnbull: Thanks.
De Weerd: Any further comments from staff? Questions from Council? If nothing
further I would entertain a motion to close.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we close CPA -- CPAM 12-001, AZ 12-005, and CP 12-003.
Hoaglun: Second.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearings on Items 8-H, I
and J. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 41 of 46
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move that we approve CPAM 12-001 and to include all staff, applicant, and
public testimony.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-H. Any discussion from
Council?
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Bill, to leave the drain open, that is in the PP, isn't it? It wouldn't be in this?
Would it be in the PP?
Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I think on one that could be in the
annexation because there is a DA.
Bird: Oh, the --
Nary: Yeah. There is a DA with that, so --
De Weerd: Okay. Any discussion from Council? I would just make a comment. You
know, I appreciate the testimony by Mr. Chappell and there was a lot of work and
participation in this Ten Mile area specific plan. A lot of that participation was by
Brighton Company and who knows probably better than most what the design criteria is
and I think that where there is confidence from this Council -- and I don't know how they
are going to vote. I can only anticipate. But they have been a quality developer in this
community and they have certainly upped the ante in the development that they have
done and have led -- I think been a contributor to the community and the community we
have become. So, I do have confidence that they will develop this in the manner and
the vision that was anticipated. It looks a little bit different than the blue and brown and
yellow with all that red, but it is a little bit different market and I have full confidence in
the design and quality they will bring to that area. But I appreciate your comments.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: I just want to comment on that as well. I thought Ralph brought up a very
valid point and, you know, I will be disappointed if once this is all said and done that the
vision doesn't remain, that if it gets changed completely -- at the same time you weigh
that against what the market will -- will bring forth and can support. In many ways I see
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 42 of 48
this development as helping be the springboard for the other parts to be accomplished
as laid out. But at the same time I'm not naive enough to think that there still won't be
further tweaks as we go along. Really, if I had my dream here, I would love to see a
Boise Hawks stadium going right there, right along the freeway, great access, the whole
bit. But they didn't come through with that, so --
De Weerd: Well, maybe the property to the north.
Hoaglun: Maybe the property to the north. I have hope. So, you know, it's one of those
things you have to work within what -- what people are willing to do and how to do it,
but, yeah, I would be disappointed if all that time and effort that laid out here and it looks
good on paper, doesn't come to fruition and --but there will be further tweaks, but I think
-- I hope -- I hope that in the end what staff worked so diligently on and the Council and
Mayor put a lot of time and effort into comes forth, so -- and the only other comment I
have overall is the fact that when I sit in my third story office in the City of Boise and I
look out on the first floor building below me and look at all that ugly duct work there is
nothing I can do about it and it's kind of difficult when one area is higher than another,
you're going to see what you're going to see and it's very difficult to disguise that, so --
and Iknow when you go up Glenwood and Fred Meyers is down there, you can get --
you see the -- it's cost prohibitive to do something different. So, while it would be nice
green to have, but I -- let design review work on the other stuff from ground level.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: As long as we are commenting, I think that David and his staff have brought
forward a very very good project and I can't thank -- and I know you feel the same way
about this. I can't thank Eric and his group for ten years ago getting this started. They
are the ones that come in here and got us really believing in what could be done here
and stuff and David has taken farther along with it and, Eric, I just appreciate what you
have done out there in that area for us and what you started for us. I certainly
remember it.
De Weerd: I think I remember Steve and you and I pouring over Powerpoint
presentations and tag teaming perhaps on occasion. I recall those days as well. And,
you know, I have on the public record the developer giving us his word on the quality
and so if I have to pull out those minutes I will. I don't think I will.
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: Just a further philosophical comment. A lot of good work went into the Ten
Mile area plan and a lot of good thoughtful input from a lot of people, stakeholders and
others, and I participated in some of those meetings. Personally, my thinking was that
Meridian Cily Council
September 18, 2012
Page 43 of 48
the area that is proposed to be commercial probably should have been designated
commercial at that time, but I bowed to the people who were in the process and came
up with what they did. But I will say change -- changing this area to commercial fits a
little bit of my philosophy of how we deal with Meridian as the central city in this valley
and subject to all the traffic that passes through here. Instead of kicking about the traffic
I say we need to find ways to get them to stop and leave a few dollars here and you talk
about one of our major transportation corridors and now with the Ten Mile interchange, I
see this as an excellent opportunity to enhance Meridian's ability to attract passers
through to actually stop and do something here. So, I'm clearly in favor of this.
De Weerd: And I will just note as well, since Mr. Turnbull had mentioned perhaps some
office -- multi-story office, we will certainly work with them in any way we can to attract
users to that site that will bring additional value both to the development and to our
economic development. So, if there is no further discussion from Council, Madam
Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve AZ 12-005 with staff, applicant, and public testimony, with the
provision that the drain stays uncovered.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second on Item H. Mr. Bird, I think it's not just the
drain, but there was a requirement that we believe that it's under the annexation on the
sign and the applicant agrees with the --
Bird: That -- would. the applicant testify that he and -- to the plan of the staff. So, I
thought I covered that for --
De Weerd: I would like to offer maybe just one comment is on -- if the north -- property
to the north does not develop within five years or another partner doesn't step forward to
fund, that the surety shall be returned to the developer.
Bird: I agree with that and that's what was agreed upon.
De Weerd: Well, I just added that language.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 44 of 48
Bird: Okay. I agree.
Zaremba: Second agrees.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Any further discussion? Madam Clerk.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I move we approve PP 12-003 and include all staff, applicant, and public
testimony.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8-J. Madam Clerk, roll call,
please.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
K. Amended onto the Agenda: Public Hearing Continued from
March 27, 2012: AZ 11-003 King Property by Dexter King
Located at 1195 W. Overland Road Request: Annexation and
Zoning of 8 Acres of Land within an R-8 Zoning District
De Weerd: Item 8-K is amended to the agenda, which is a public hearing continued
from March 27th on AZ 11-003. The applicant has requested that this be continued to
November 6th, 2012. Council, do I have a motion?
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Hoaglun.
Hoaglun: I move that we continue the public hearing on AZ 11-003 until November 6,
2012.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 45 of 48
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to continue this item to November 6th.
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: Looking at the calendar November 6 is election day. We would hold that
meeting on Wednesday, November 7th.
De Weerd: Thank you.
Hoaglun: Make that motion to be November 7th. Thank you for catching that,
Councilman.
Zaremba: Did I second the original -- I
De Weerd: Yes.
Zaremba: Second accepts the change.
De Weerd: Well, thank you. All those in favor to continuing this item to November 7th
say aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 9: Department Reports
A. Mayor's Office: Letter of Support for the Meridian Anatomy and
Physiology Laboratory
De Weerd: Okay. Item 9-A is under Department Reports. Council, you have a draft of
a letter of support for the Treasure Valley -- for ISU's proposed lab and we did make a
couple of changes to it, adding a little bit more specifics to what this lab would bring to
our community and just making a stronger argument for supporting this asset in our
community. Any comments -- oh, yeah, you just got it, so --
Bird: Absolutely fantastic.
De Weerd: President Vailas did make a presentation to the Chamber of Commerce
today. It has such huge potential for this Treasure Valley region, for the entire state and
certainly bringing a lab of this type would bring the kind of research to our community
that I think will enhance the activities in the core, health, science and technology
corridor and the momentum that's building in that area.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 46 of 48
Bird: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I believe a laboratory like this would bring so many offshoots of industry and -- to
the core that I just would pray that we get it here. I think it's a great asset.
De Weerd: And, actually, the -- the asset of a forensic lab as being part of this proposal
has certainly good -- good positive ramifications I think for our law enforcement and our
public safety vision in that area as well.
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor, just a comment. My daughter-in-law is a -- graduate studies
to become a physical therapist and doing schooling in Missouri and the cadaver studies
and everything, that was something she really looked for in a school. I mean when they
do the hands on and really understand the human body I guess from talking to her there
is no substitute for that and that would be certainly something that would be beneficial
and you want to bring students to a region when they are looking for that in depth work
and to really understand things, I certainly can support this letter.
De Weerd: Thank you so much. Mr. Zaremba.
Zaremba: Madam Mayor, I saw the original letter and thought that was great. The
additions to it are great as well and I absolutely do support the idea of what ISU is doing
and of our sending a letter in support. So, wondertul.
De Weerd: Council, with that said, I would like to add your names to this letter and ask
that you consider being signatories as well.
Bird: That would be a privilege to me, Tammy.
De Weerd: Okay.
Zaremba: I would be pleased.
De Weerd: Okay. We will make the changes and we will get your signature -- collect
your signatures as well.
Zaremba: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes.
Zaremba: My signature I think is on file electronically. Can I authorize that to be use or
-- I'm happy to come in and sign it in person, but if that's inconvenient --
De Weerd: That sounds good.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 47 of 48
Zaremba: When the letter is ready.
De Weerd: Yes. I'm sure we will have it ready tomorrow, but we also will need
Councilman Rountree's signature as well, so --
Bird: We will wait.
De Weerd: Yes. We will be in contact.
Zaremba: Okay.
Item 10: Ordinances
A. Ordinance No. 12-1527: On Ordinance (RZ 11-001 McNelis
Subdivision) for the Rezone of a Parcel of Land Located in the
SE'/4 of Section 34, Township 4N, Range 1W, Establishing and
Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification for 76.24
Acres of Land from the L-O Zoning District to C-G Zoning
District and .43 Acres of Land from the L-O District to the I-L
Zoning District and Providing an Effective Date Approved
De Weerd: But appreciate that offer. Sometime it's easier to do that than track all of
you down. Okay. Item 10-A is Ordinance 12-1527. Madam Clerk, will you, please,
read this ordinance by title only.
Holman: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 12-1527, an
ordinance RZ 11-001, McNelis Subdivision for the rezone of a parcel of land located in
the southeast one quarter of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range 3 West, situated in
Ada, county, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of
Meridian, as requested by the City of Meridian, establishing and determining the land
use zoning classification of 16.24 acres of land from the L-O, Limited Office Zoning
District, to C-G, General Retail and Service Commercial Zoning District, and 4.3 acres
of land from the L-O, Limited Office Zoning District, to I-L, light industrial zoning district
in the Meridian City Code, providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the
Ada County assessor, the Ada County recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission,
as required by law, and providing for a summary of the ordinance and providing for a
waiver of the reading rules and providing an effective date.
De Weerd: Thank you. You have heard this ordinance read by title only. Is there
anyone who would like to hear it read in its entirety? It's really exciting. Okay. Seeing
none, Council?
Hoaglun: Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: Yes.
Meridian City Council
September 18, 2012
Page 48 of 48
Hoaglun: I move approval of Ordinance No. 12-1527 with suspension of rules.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 10-A. If there is no
discussion, Madam Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, absent; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Item 11: Future Meeting Topics
De Weerd: Item 11. Council, do you have anything for future agendas?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Okay. I would like to congratulate our back row for making it through an
entire meeting. Ralph sits with us .every week, so you're certainly invited back. Council,
I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
Hoaglun: So moved.
Zaremba: Second.
De Weerd: All those in favor say .aye. All ayes.
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT9:13 P.M.
(AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
~l 1 /v2.
MAYOR TA DE WEERD DATE APPROVED
ATTEST. ,,~~-~~ s~'r
~" 190
City of
CEE OLMAN CITY CLERK IDZAN~
~ ~ {DAHO
,y r, b~~y
,~ 1~r iREt+~~~
Changes to Agenda: D
• King (AZ•11.003) -Requests continuance to November 6"' .L®E c~ I~~'
SEP 1 8 2092
Item #8A & B: Canterbury Commons (PP-12.005; MDA-12.002) CITY OFC4~fE~-
CITYCLERKSOFFICE
Application(s):
- Preliminary Plat and Development Agreement Modification
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 21.45 acres, is R-15, and is located at south side of W. Pine
Avenue; east of N. Ten Mile Road.
History: In 2006, the subject property was granted annexation, preliminary plat and conditional use permit approvals for amulti-family
development consisting of 196 multi-family units and 67 townhomes, a private clubhouse, pool, central open space with tot lot, basket
ball court and interconnected pathways.
Summary of Request: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat and DA modification to develop 104 residential lots, 12 common
lots and an irrigation lot far a total of 117 lots on 21.45 acres of land. The lots range in size from 5,000 square feet to 19,295 square
feet. The gross density for the proposed plat is 4.84 units to the acre consistent with the R-15 zone.
The subject property is designed Mixed-use Community on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The mixed-use area
anticipates densities between six and fifteen dwellings per acre. Although a single use development is not ideal for the mixed use
designation, staff and the Commission were of the opinion that is existing multi family and vacant commercial property in the vicinity to
comply with the designation.
The lot layout around the central park and the amount of open space has changed since the Commission hearing. The changes were
made to comply with a Public Works condition of approval to provide a looped water system without losing a buildable lots. The
proposed revisions include an additional common lot and increase in the central park from approximately 19,000 square feet to 22,000
square feet. This is an increase in open space by 2.73 percent over the previous plat. The proposed changes comply with the
requirements of the UDC however; the landscape plan will have to reflect these changes if Council approves the project.
Additionally, the amenities proposed for the subdivision have not changed and include a city pathway adjacent to the Ten Mile drain
consistent with the City's pathway plan, central park, a children's play structure and internal micropaih lots. A common lot is also
provided along the south boundary to preserve the properly for a future City pathway if one cannot be constructed within the railroad
right-of-way.
Elevations were provided with the subject application. The homes depict a mixture of building materials, decorative corbels wood
shutters and stone wainscot. A DA provision requires compliance with the submitted elevations.
Commission Recommendation: Approval at the August 16, 2012 Public Hearing
Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Scott Noriyuki
ii. In opposition:
iii. Commenting:
iv. Written testimony:
Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission:
i. None
Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
i. Commission added a condition for compliance with the common drive standards outlined in UDC 11-6C-3D.
ii. Commission struck condition 1.2.1 bullet #1.
iii. Commission added a condition that requires the looped water system and the central park including amenities to be
constructed with the second phase of development.
iv. The Commission required a revised landscape plan 10 days prior to the City Council hearing. The revised landscape plan
is attached in Exhibit A.
Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Applicant is in agreement with the preliminary plat conditions of approval but would
like to discuss with Council the following revisions to modified DA provisions:
1) Update the DA to reflect 104 buildable lots not 103;
2) Staff recommends that the applicant provide the entire street frontage improvements including landscaping along
Pine Avenue with the first phase of development. The applicant is requests that they be allowed to complete the remainder
of the Pine Street sidewalk during Phase I construction but not be required to complete landscaping and road/box culvert
widening until Phase 3 is constructed
3) The applicant is requesting that landscape improvements required for the southern common lot (Lot 26, Block 1) be installed
with Phase 3. Staff recommends Council require these improvements consistent with Phase 2 consistent with the
phase boundary.
Staff received written testimony from Steve Meharry. The applicant and staff have contacted Mr. Meharry and all concerns have been
addressed.
Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. None
Notes
Item #8C & D: Olson & Bush (CPAM•12.003; AZ•12.003)
Application(s):
- Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
- Annexation & Zoning
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 6.84 acres, is currently zoned RUT in Ada County, and is
located at 2950 E. Franklin Road.
Summary of Request: The applicant requests an amendment to the comprehensive plan FLUM to change the land use designation
on 5.66 +/-acres of land from Commercial to Industrial. Concurrently, the applicant requests annexation & zoning of 1.41 acres of land
to the C-G zoning district & 5.78 acres to the I-L zoning district, consistent with the existing & proposed FLUM designations of
Commercial & Industrial for the site.
The applicant plans to re-plat the portion of Olson & Bush Subdivision No. 2 that lies to the north of this site to include the subject
property creating longer light industrial lots that fronton Lanark Street as shown on the concept plan. The portion of the site that fronts
on Franklin Road is proposed to be Commercial (see Exhibit A.2).
There is an existing home on the property proposed to be zoned C-G that is proposed to remain as such until the property redevelops.
The applicant requests the home not be required to hook-up to City services until such time as the property redevelops or the
system(s) fail.
Commission Recommendation: Approval
Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Ron Van Auker Jr.
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written testimony: Brad Miller (response to the staff report) -Requests that the existing home be allowed to continue using fhe
well & sewer until such time as either fhe well or septic fails, or residential use of the property is discontinued & the properly
redevelops.
Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission:
i. The timing for the existing home to hook-up to City water & sewer service.
Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
i. The Commission recommended the existing home not be required to hook-up to City water & sewer service until such time as
the property re-develops or the system(s) fails (see Exhibit B, #1.1.1 a).
Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None
Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: The timing for the existing home to hook-up to City water & sewer service.
Notes:
Item #8E, F, G: Paramount East (CPAM-12-002; RZ-12.001; PP-12.002)
Application(s):
- Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, Rezone and Preliminary Plat
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 12.90 acres, is currently zoned L-0 and is located on the west
side of N. Meridian Road between W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road.
History: The subject property was included in the annexation (AZ-03-006), preliminary plat (PP-03-004), and conditional use
permit/planned development (CUP-03-008) for Paramount Subdivision approved in 2003.
Summary of Request: The applicant has applied for an amendment to the comprehensive plan future land use map (CPAM) to
change the land use designation from office to medium-density residential (MDR); rezone (RZ) of 12.47 acres of land from the L-0
(Limited Office) zoning district to the R-8 (Medium-density residential) zoriing district and preliminary plat (PP) approval consisting of 46
residential lots and 6 common Icts is also proposed for the subject site. The gross density of 4.03 (net density of 5.0) dwelling units per
acre proposed with the subdivision is consistent with proposed MDR designation and the proposed R-8 zone.
All of the proposed-lots conform to the proposed R-8 dimensional standards. A new collector road is proposed at the'/< mile consistent
with the approved Paramount planned development. Multiple stud streets are to be extended from existing Paramount phases.
Open space totals 17.4 percent and consists of street buffers and center medians. Because the plat is less than 20 acres in size the
UDC does not require any amenities. Amenities constructed in early phases of Paramount will serve this development as well.
The applicant has submitted sample elevations that depict the quality of homes proposed for the development. The proposed homes
are consistent with the homes constructed in the area.
Because the proposed development is subject to the development agreement (DA) approved with the original Paramount annexation,
staff is not recommending a new DA with the rezone application.
Commission Recommendation: Approval at the August 16, 2012 Public Hearing
Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Mike Wardle
ii. In opposition:
iii. Commenting: James Mitchell
iv. Written testimony:
Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission:
i. None
Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
i. None
Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Mike Wardle, in agreement with the Commission recommendation.
Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. None
Notes:
Item #8H, I, & J: TM Crossing (CPAM-12.001; AZ•12.005; PP-12.003)
Application(s):
- Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
- Rezone
- Preliminary Plat
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 75.5 acres, is currently zoned RUT in Ada County, and is
located on the northeast corner of I-84 & S. Ten Mile Road.
Summary of Request & Staffs Analysis:
• The applicant requests an amendment to the FLUM contained in the TMISAP to change the land use designation on a total of
75.5 acres of land from Lifestyle Center (30.45+/- acres); Medium High Density Residential (8.5+/-acres); and High Density
Employment (39.75 acres) to Commercial
Because 176 acres of Mixed Employment uses are planned to the south of I-84 & 76 acres of High Density Employment uses
are planned to the west of Ten Mile Rd; and a lifestyle center is under construction at Fairview & Eagle, the Commission is of
the opinion a Commercial designation maybe appropriate for this property as long as the property develops in accord with the
design elements of the TMISAP.
• Annexation and zoning of 89.22 acres of land with the C-G district is proposed consistent with the proposed FLUM
designation of Commercial. A conceptual development plan was submitted that depicts future building locations, parking,
streets, and drive aisles. Sample building elevations were also submitted.
Because the Zoning Compatibility Matrix in the TMISAP lists the C-G district as a zoning choice for the existing LC & HDE
designated areas as well as the proposed Commercial designation, the Commission recommends approval of the requested
zoning.
Hours of operation for businesses in the C-G district that are adjacent to residential uses are limited from 6 am to 11 pm. This
will apply to businesses along the east boundary of the site adjacent to Primrose Subdivision.
As a provision of annexation, staff is recommending a DA wrfh the provisions listed in Exhibit B of the staff report.
• A preliminary plat consisting of 50 commercial building lots & 4 common/other lots was also submitted. The preliminary plat is
proposed to develop in 2 phases.
Access is proposed via an off-site access to Ten Mile Road north of the site; no other access is available to the site at this
time. ACHD policy restricts the amount of traffic allowed on a collector street with onty one public street access in & out of the
site to 3,000 vehicle trips per day. Additionally, the Fire Dept requires commercial buildings or facilities having a gross
building area of more than 62,000 s.f. fo be provided wrfh 2 separate & approved fire apparatus roads. Therefore,
development will be limited until a secondary access can be provided.
The transportation system map contained in the TMISAP depicts an off-site access to Ten Mile (north of the site) which runs
south to a round-a-bout at the north boundary of the site. From there, a collector street is shown along the north boundary of
the site to the east & also to the south and back fo the west under the Ten Mile ramp. From the roundabout, the street section
map shows 2-lane streets as appropriate for this site.
The applicant proposes a roundabout at the north boundary of the site with 4-lane streets & a median turn lane throughout the
site except for the leg that runs to the west under the Ten Mile ramp, which is a 2-lane street, consistent with the street
section map. While the 4-lane w/a median turn lane is an option for a street layout in the Ten Mile area, a street of this size is
meant to serve as an arterial w/access restricted to collectors. Because of the high volume of traffic that is likely to be
generated from the proposed development, the Commission is of the opinion the proposed streets are appropriate.
The Purdam Drain currently bisects this site from the SEC to the NWC. The Taylor Drain connects to the Purdam Drain from
the south. The Purdam Drain is proposed to be relocated along the southern & western boundary of the site. Both of These
existing easements are proposed to be vacated.
Landscape street buffers and buffers to residential uses area proposed on the landscape plan in accord w/UDC standards
Commission Recommendation: Approval at the August 16'~ public hearing
Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Mike Wardle
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written testimony: Mike Wardle (response to the staff report)
Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission:
i. Modifying the FLUM to allow for commercial rather than mixed-use development in this area.
Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: (At the recommendation of staff)
i. Modify DA provision #1.1.2a to require a revised concept plan, consistent with the design elements of the Ten Mile plan, to be
submitted prior to submittal of the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance;
ii. Add a DA provision requiring all street names within the development to be approved by the street name committee or the
Planning Commission as applicable, prior to final plat approval (see Exhibit B, #1.1.2j);
iii. Add a DA provision requiring a roundabout at the north property boundary (see Exhibit B, #1.1.2k).
Outstanding-Issue(s) for City Council:
i. The applicant requests a waiver from City Council to UDC 11-3A-6A.3a, which requires the Purdam Drain to be covered due to
its large capacity. Council may waive this requirement if # finds that the public purpose requiring sucfi will nofbe served and
public safety can be preserved in order to waive fhe requirement, or, for large capacity facilities. (see Exhibit A.8 for across-
section of fhe Purdam Drain)
Written Testimony since Commission Hearing:
• Mirazim Shakoori, Treasure Valley Investments (property owner to the north) -requests an alternative roundabout design that
is more centrally located on the property to the north be added as an option in the DA (see proposed design below). He also
requests screening of roof-top mechanical equipment, loading docks, refuse & storage areas; and a heightened level of
architectural emphasis on the rear walls of the buildings facing his property. This will be taken care of w/Design Review.
• Mike Wardle -Requests DA provision #1.1.2e be modified as follows: "A Welcome to Meridian sign shall be constructed~tthe
r.,....,,.r.,,,.....,,.. ,., .,,...~~.., r~..r.,^r~.,, P P
tl~:e!=^°'° ^°^^^°^ ^^ "`° ° ~'^^« ^~~^^~* ' 'h' ' north of the I-84 off-ram to Ten Mile Road. The tlevelo er shall
coordinate the funding, design and location of the sign with City Planning staff and the commercial development properties
along Ten Mile Road, north to Franklin Road."
In lieu of the applicant's request, staff recommends the following language: "Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy within the site, the developer shall submit a surety to the City of Meridian for half (1l2) the cost of a Welcome to
Meridian sign to be placed at the intersection of S. Ten Mile Road & S. Smithfield Drive on the property to the north. The
developer shall coordinate the design and location of the sign with City Planning staff.
The intent being for the property owner to the north to pay for the remaining portion of the sign at the time of development of
Parcel #S1214233665 and construct the sign at that time. If the referenced property to the north does not develop within five
(5) years, the surety shall be returned to the developer and the developer shall have no further obligation pertaining to the
sign:'
Notes:
s •
:~
~:
a r
~~
~~
~-
fy
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 5A
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Approval of Award of RFQ and Master Agreements for Professional Services and
Authorize the Purchasing Manager to Sign the Non-Financial (Zero Dollar) Master
Agreements with the 18 Firms
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Memo
To: Jaycee L. Holman, City Clerk,
From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager
CC: Kyle Radek
Date: 9!13/12
Re: September 18 City Council Meeting Agenda Item
The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the
September 18 City Council Consent Agenda for Council's consideration.
Approval of Award of RFQ and Master Agreements for Professional Services_in
Categories:
16-Water Supply and Distribution Engineering - Waterline Construction,
Rehabilitation, and Reconstruction/Replacement Design.
26-Wastewater Collection and Treatment Engineering Lift Station Design and
Consultation.
7A-Electrical Engineering -Water and Wasatewater Constrol Systems and SCADA
System Design and Programming.
8A-Environmental Engineering -Reclaimed Water Program Development, Design,
Etc.
SB-Environmental Engineering -NPDES Stormwater Consulting; Environmental
Assessment for NPDES Permitting; Wetlands Delineation and Wetlands Mitigation,
Stream, Wetland, and Riparian Environment Restoration
1 OA-Geographic Information Systems GIS System Development and Upgrades
This award is the result of Formal RFQ #CW-01-2012 issued July 9"' and opened
July 27'x. Forty one responses were received in which 18 Master Agreements will be
entered into utilizing the City's standard template.
• Page 1
( Recommended Council Action: Approval of Award of RFQ and Authorize the
Purchasing Manager to sign the non-financial (zero dollar) Master Agreements
with the 18 flrrns Ilsted on page 3 of this memo. Task Orders issued from the
Master Agreements will be approved per the existing Purchasing Policy.
Thank you for your consideration.
• Page 2
~,,,/QirE IDIAN°
if"A SiB
City of Meridian
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ROSTER OVER $25000
SELECTION
cw-o -2012
DUE DATE & TIME: Jul 27, 2012 4:00 p.m.
CATEGORY: 7 B - Water Supply and Dlstrlbu0on Engineering -
Waterline Construction, Rehabititatlon, and Reconstruction/Replacement Desi n
VENDORS SELECTED: Civil Survey
In Alphabetical Ortler JUB
Keller
CATEGORY: 26 - Wastewater Coliecgon and Treatment Engineering
Lilt Station Desi nand Consultation
VENDORS SELECTED: JUB
In Alphabetical Order Keller
Murra ,Smith & Associates
CATEGORY: 7A -Electrical Engineering -
Waterand Wastewater Control S stems and SCADA System Dealgn and Programmin
VENDORS SELECTED: CH2M HIII
In Alphabetical Order Control Engineers
DC En Ineerin
CATEGORY: 8A -Environmental Engineering -
Reclaimed Water Program Development, Deal n, Etc
VENDORS SELECTED: Brown & Caldwell
In Alphabetical Order CH2M Hill
JUB
CATEGORY: BB - Environmental Engineering -
NPDES Stormwater Consulting; Environmental Assessment for NPDES Permitting;
Wetands Delinea0on and Wetlands Mitigation, Stream, Wetland,
and Riparten Environment Restoretlon
VENDORS SELECTED: Brown & Caldwell
In Alphabetical Order CH2M HIII
HDR
CATEGORY: 10A -Geographic Information Systems
OIS System Develo ment and Upgrades
VENDORS SELECTED: Brown & Caldwell
In Alphabetical Order JUB
Resource Data
(. Date Pasted: September 5, 2012
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 5B
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Agreement for Professional Services with Kathy Drury-Bogle Consulting, LLC for Human
Resources Consulting Services
MEETING NOTES
~~F~~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE F/NAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
AGREEMENT
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, madethis ~C7 day of ~~~~ ~-P~ , 2012, by and
between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and
KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC, hereinafter referred to as "KATHY DRURY-
BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC", 4222 S. Piner•est Way, Boise, Idaho 83716.
Scope of Services: KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall
perform all services, and comply in all respects, as specified in the document titled
"Scope of Services" a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by this reference, together with any amendments that may be
agreed to in writing by the parties.
2. Time of Performance: This agreement shall become effective upon execution by
both parties, and shall expire on September 30, 2013 unless earlier terminated or
extended.
3. Indemnification and Insurance: I{ATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING,
LLC shall indemnify and save and hold humless CITY from and for any and all
losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property
and losses and expenses caused or incuned by KATHY DRURY-BOGLE
CONSULTING, LLC, its servants, agents, employees, guests, and business
invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortuous conduct of CITY or its
employees. KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall maintain, and
specifically agrees that it wfll maintain, tluoughout the term of this Agreement,
liability insurance, in which the CITY shall be named an additional insured in the
minimum amount as specified in the Idaho Tart Claims Act set forth in Title 6,
Chapter 9 of the Idaho Code. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a
limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY; and if
CITY becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein
provided, KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC covenants and agrees
to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY from and for all such losses,
claims, actions, or judgments for damages or liability to persons or property.
Additionally, KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall maintain
Workers Compensation Insurance, in the statutory limits as required bylaw.
I{ATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall provide CITY with a
Certificate of Insurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing KATHY
DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC's wmpliance with the requirements of
this paragraph and file such proof of insurance with the C1TY. In the event the
insurance minimums are changed, KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING,
LLC shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits.
Evidence of all insurance shall he submitted to the City Clerk with a copy to
Human Resources Consulting Agreement -KATHY DRUAY-BOGLE CONSULTBVG, LLC- page ] of 5
Meridian City Human Resources, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 308, Meridian,
Idaho 83642.
4. Independent Contractor: Irr all matters pertaitting to this agreement, KATHY
DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall be acting as an independent
conhactor, and neither KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC nor any
officer, employee or agent of KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC
will be deemed an employee of CITY. The selection and designation of the
personnel of the CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by the
CITY.
5. Presentation Materials: All matetials prepared for the purpose of this agreement
as well as any and all materials actually used in the presentation of the services
contemplated by this agreement shall be the property of the CITY.
6. Compensation KATFIY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall be
compensated fot• professional human resources services pursuant to and specified
in attached Exhibit "A." During the remainder of this agreement, if the CITY
uses KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC for the same or additional
training then a new Scope of Work shall be prepared and incorporated by
reference with this Agreement.
7 Method of Payment: KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC will
invoice the City of Meridian Human Resources Department at 33 East Broadway
Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 directly for all current amounts earned under this
Agreement at the end of each month. The CITY will pay all invoices within thirty
(30) days after receipt.
Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto,
unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed
communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt
requested, addressed as follows:
City Clerk
City of Meridian
Attn: Human Resources
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642
KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC
4222 Pinerest Way
Boise, Idaho 83716
Either patty may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving
written notice of such chauge to the other in the manner herein provided.
Humun Resources Consulting Agreement - KA"ITIY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC-page 2 of 5
9. Attorney Fees: Should auy litigation be commenced between the parties hereto
concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to
any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as
determined by a Comt of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed
to be. a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default,
termination or forfeiture of this Agreement.
10. Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is
shictly of the essence with respect to each and every team, condition and provision
hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder
shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agrrzment by the party so
failing to peiforarr.
11. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that
KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall not have the right to
assign, h~ansfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights under this Agreement except
upon the prior express written consent of CITY.
12. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Services required herein, KATHY
DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall not discriminate against any person
on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or
disability.
13. Reports and Information: At such times and in such forms as the C1TY may
require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports,
data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by
this Agieement.
14. Audits and Inspections: At any fime during normal business hours and as often
as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for
examination all of KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC'S records
with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. KATHY DRURY-BOGLE
CONSULTING, LLC shall permit the CITY to audit, examine, and make excerpts
or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all conhacts, invoices,
materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data
relating to all matters covered by this Agreement.
I5. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material: No material produced in
whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to wpyright in the United
States or in any other country. The CITY shall have unresh•icted authority to
pub]ish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other
materials prepared under this Agreement.
Human Resources Consulfing Agreement-KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC-page 3 of 5
16. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of services required hereunder,
KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall comply with all applicable
Iaws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments.
17. Changes: The CITY may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of
Services to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or
decrease in the amount of KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC's
compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and
KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC, shall be incorporated in written
amendments to this Agreement.
18. Termination: If, through any cause, KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING,
LLC, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper
manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants,
agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document
required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any
other act of misconduct in the performance of this conhact, or if the Ci ty Council
determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the
CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written
notice to KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC of such termination
and specifying the effective date thereof at least fifteen (15) days before the
effective date of such termination. KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING,
LLC may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least fifteen (I S) days
notice to CITY.
In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or unfinished
documents, data, and reports prepazed by I{ATHY DRURY-BOGLE
CONSULTING, LLC under this Agreement shall, at the option ofthe CITY,
become its property, and KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC shall
be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily
complete hereunder.
Notwithstanding the above, KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC
shall not be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY
by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by KATHY DRURY-BOGLE
CONSULTING, LLC, and the CITY may withhold any payments to KATHY
DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC for the purposes of set-off until such time
as the exact amount of damages due the CITY from KATHY DRURY-BOGLE
CONSULTING, LLC is determined. This provision shall survive the termination
of this agreement and shall not relieve KATHY DRURY-BOGLE
CONSULTING, LLC of its liability to the CITY for damages.
19. Construction and Severability: If any part of this Ageement is held to be
invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability
of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is
reasonably capable of completion.
Htunan Resources Consulting Ag'eement -KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC -page 4 of 5
20. Entire Agreement: This Ayeement contains the entire agreement of the parties
and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written,
whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith.
21. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of
the City of Meridian.
22. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until
approved by the City of Meridian.
I{AT$Y DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC.
a y Dru ogle
Manager
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Human Resources Consulting Agreement -KATHY DRURY-BOGLE CONSULTING, LLC -page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT "A"
Scope of Work
To create an employee development program. Delivery of content developed may also be within
scope of this contract.
Kathy Drury-Bogle will work u to 20 hours per month, working either at home office or on-site at
City of Meridian during regular Monday through Friday week day hours. Additional hours or
reduction of hours can be negotiated on an as-needed basis.
Services Requested
The services requested by Kathy Drury-Bogle Consulting, LLC, will include but will not be limited
to the following:
• Review of existing training content
^ Identify course content and develop descriptions
^ Develop course materials (Facilitator and Participant) and customize to City of Meridian's
needs
• Make course material purchase recommendations for external resources to align with
program requirements
• Deliver courses to employees
• Train internal staff to deliver courses
• Provide ongoing support on utilization of employee training programs /curriculum
• Utilize purchased curriculum and design, develop, and customize a facilitator guide,
PowerPoint presentation, and worksheets/handouts for City selected training courses.
Courses will utilize experiential learning techniques to engage learners and allow them to
practice concepts introduced in the class.
• Provide all course materials in Microsoft Word format. Course materials will be the
property of the City of Meridian and will be able to be customized and utilized for different
employee groups.
• Dates will be determined by both the City of Meridian schedule and Kathy Drury Bogle
Consulting availability.
Roles and Responsibilities of the City of Meridian
• Provide purchased curriculum and information needed to adequately customize the
course for your needs.
• Provide timely feedback regarding course materials regarding any revisions you wish to
be made.
• Provide the training goals/objectives.
• Provide the training venue (location), copies of course materials, and other training
materials (flipchart or white board, LDS Projector - if you would like a PowerPoint slide
show to support the class), TV and DVD player.
• Provide timely payment of services (within 45 days of the final service)
Cost: Fee Schedule
^ Hourly rate of $100.00
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER:
~ PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Pressure Reducing Valve Easement Agreement with Logan Kinney
MEETING NOTES
~)N z"
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
E IDIAN~-
Public ~ D A H O
Works Department
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
CIly Ceun~ll MembeU~
Keith Bird
Brad Hoaglun
Charles Rountree
David Zaremba
TO: Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Members of the City Council
FROM: Clint Worthington
Staff Engineer II
DATE: 9/11/2012
SUBJECT: PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH
LOGAN HINNEY
L RECOMMENDED ACTION
A. Move to:
Approve the Pressure Reducing Valve Easement Agreement with Logan Kinney.
2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the easement.
II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS
Clint Worthington, Staff Engineer II (Project Manager) 489-0349
Kyle Radek, Asst. City Engineer 489-0344
Warren Stewart, PW Engineering Manager 489-0350
Tom Barry, Public Works Director 489-0372
IL DESCRIPTION
A. Back rg ound
Development in the north and west areas of Meridian will require reduction of
distribution system pressures, and additionally establishment of pressure zone 1 was
called for in the 2012 Water Master Plan. Without the development of the new pressure
zone, system pressures will exceed 80 and even 90 psi in west Meridian. Idaho Rules for
Public Drinking water systems recommends that pressures be kept below 80 psi. High
system pressure contributes to leaks, more maintenance, and wasted water in both the
public infrastructure and home plumbing systems.
The creation of Pressure Zone 1 was approved and is currently under construction. An
easement was purchased along Ustick Road to construct one of the three PRV's
associated with the project. Upon excavation, it was discovered that there were two
sewer services and a gas service within the easement. In order to place the PRV within
the easement, the services would have to be moved which would result in considerable
Page 1 of 2
additional costs. Anew easement adjacent to the existing one has been identified. There
are no conflicts at this new location and constructing the PRV here is less expensive than
relocating the existing services.
III. IlVIPACT
A. Fiscal Impacts:
Cost to Prepare Easement Documents (Civil Survey Con, Inc.) 300.00
Property Owner Easement Costs $2,500.00
Total Cost for Easement $2,800.00
IV. LIST OF ATTACIIMENTS
A. Pressure Reducing Valve Easement
B. Easement Legal Description -Exhibit A
C. Easement Map -Exhibit B
Approved for Council Agenda:
arren Stewart
2 L
Da
Page 2 of 2
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Aioh AMOUNT .00 i
BOISE IDAHO 09119112 03:41 PM
DEPUTY Bonnie Oberbillig III I III IIIIII III III II II IIII I I III I I III
RECORDED-REQUEST OF 11209E.132
Meridian Ciry
PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE EASEMENT
-1-h
THIS INDENTURE, made this f ~ - day of ~ 20~between Logan P. Kinney
the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County,
Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) right-of--way across
the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and
WHEREAS, the PRV is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by
others; and
WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said PRV from time to time by the
Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other
good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee
the right-of--way for an easement for the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement
of a PRV over and across the following described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B)
The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a PRV and their
allied facilities, together with their maintenance, additional connection thereto, repair and
replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at
any and all times.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of--way unto the said Grantee, it's
successors and assigns forever.
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that
after construction, making repairs, performing other maintenance or making subsequent
connection to the water line, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property
to that existent prior to undertaking such construction, repairs and maintenance. However,
Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the
area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement.
THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any
permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for
this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS herebypovenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-
of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any
public street, then, to such extent, such right-of--way and easement hereby granted which lies
within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and
Pressure Reducing Valve Easement Kinney
Easement.docx
GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN
CityoE
9~
e
Tammy d~~rd, Mayor
~oaxo
~ ~...
Attest by(J~ycee L. Holman, City Clerk '°'~e..eer
Approved By City Council On: ~ ~ tn~-.~.e ~9T~/~
STATE OF IDAHO )
ss
County of Ada )
On this ~$_ day of~,hM ~ , 20 I a ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and JAYCEE L.
HOLMAN, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian,
Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of
Meridian executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and
year first above written.
A~~!
a
OTARY ~ UBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at: ~-(2.Ir~r.~ta~n I C~
Commission Expires: Jan ~} , ~.nf
Pressure Reducing Valve Easement Kinney
Easement.docx
of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and
possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful
right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet
possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their
signatures the day and year first herein above written.
GRANTOR:
Logo. k;n.~¢y 3-- `-
~.
Owner
36/~ w. H.r'F; c IL
Address
Secretary
STATE OF IDAHO )
ss
County of Ada )
On this ~ l~ day of S z~k , 20 ~ ?before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared ~o acJ ~; ~~e and
,known or identified to me to be the President and Secretary, respective y, of the corporation that
executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the
same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and
year fist above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO
Residing at ~o vae ~ =d--
CommissionExpires: 5- a-0- ao t~
Pressure Reducing Valve Easement Kinney
Easement.docx
~^ . ~
O O
/~~
~ y
U~~
~,/O O
ZWm
"1 ~ ~ Q
~o~o
1
~~~~ o
~W~j
- J ~ ~
Z~~v
~~s°o
O Q
Q W
O r `~
r
O~
~vZ
~ O
~ ~
W
J
H
~
h0
h
Z
rr w
Z
o
z
o =~
NI ~m N
^ 3
~M „OO,LL.O S
00 5'd
~ ,
~
°
. .
~
I I~ ~
~
ol ~~
~
0
lo
o
o ~,
N o
~. o
(~I IZ w
,oo sz
3 „OO,Ll.O N I o
h
Fl h
o
M
~ ~ O
~l
I J
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
FOR THE
CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO
PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE (PRV)
An easement for water line pressure relief valve purposes located in the SE '/< of Section 34,
Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin marking the southeasterly corner of said SE % from
which a brass cap marking the southwesterly corner of said SE '/a bears N 89°43'00" W a
distance of 2640.72 feet;
Thence N 89°43'00" W along the southerly boundary of said SE'/ a distance of 1263.56 feet to
a point;
Thence leaving said southerly boundary N 4°18'58" W a distance of 25.08 feet to a point;
Thence N 89°43'00" W a distance of 28.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing N 89°43'00" W a distance of 40.00 feet to a point;
Thence N 0°17'00" E a distance of 25.00 feet to a point;
Thence S 89°43'00" E a distance of 40.00 feet to a point;
Thence S 0°17'00" W a distance of 25.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
This parcel contains 1,000 square feet (0.023 acres) and is subject to any other easements
existing or in use.
This description was prepared from record information obtained from the Ada County
Recorder's office. Afield survey was not performed. Civil Survey Consultants, Incorporated is
not responsible for any errors or discrepancies a field survey might disclose.
Prepared by: Glenn K. Bennett, PLS
Civil Survey Consultants, Incorporated
September 10, 2012
PROJECT: Monday, September 10,2012
DESCRIPTION: 2:54 PM
FILE: M:\12002\SURVEY\CONTROL.CGO PAGE 2
UNITS: U.S. SURVEY FOOT
INSTRUMENT SETUP
Instrument point: 1 10000. 0000 10000.0000
Backlight point: 1 10000. 0000 10000.0000
Backlight Searing: N 00°00'00.0" E Distance: 0.000
Remarks: PRV EASEMENT
TYPE FROM TO DIRECTION DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING
------ -----
INV 1 -----
3 ---
N ------------
89°43'00.0" -
W ---------- -
1263.560 -----------
10006.2484 ------------
8736.4554
INV 3 10 N 04°18'58.0" W 25.081 10031.2580 8739.5679
INV 10 15 N 89°93'00.0" W 28.000 10031.3965 8706.5682
INV 15 16 N 89°43'00.0" W 40.000 10031.5993 8666.5687
INV 16 17 N 00°17'00.0" E 25.000 10056.5940 8666.6924
INV 17 16 S 89°93'00.0" E 40.000 10056.3962 8706.6919
INV 18 15 S 00°17'00.0" W 25.000 10031.3965 8706.5682
INV 15 10 S 89°43'00.0" E 28.000 10031.2580 8734.5679
INV 10 3 S 04°18'58.0" E 25.081 10006.2989 8736.9559
INV 3 1 S 89°43'00.0" E 1263.560 10000.0000 10000.0000
Perimeter is: 2763.282
Area is: 1000.000 Square feet 0.0230 Acres
Area has been reset.
City of Meridian
33 East Broadway Ave., Meridian, ID 83642
PERMANENT EASEMENT CONTRACT
Project # and Description: Pressure Zone 1
Parcel # and Owner: SO434438900 -Loean P. Kinnev
Date of Offer: Member 10, 2012
~ Zol2
THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTRACT, made this day of 2609; between the City of Meridian,
acting by its Mayor and Council, herein called "CITY" and Loean P. Kinney, herein called "GRANTOR".
WHEREAS, subject to the terms outlined below, GRANTOR agees to deliver to the CITY a Permanent Potable Water
Easement included herewith as Exhibits "A" and "B":
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. CITY shall pay GRANTOR and the lien holder, if any, such sums of money and/or benefits as are set out below:
ITEM DESCRIPTION AREA GROSS VALUE VALUATION EASEMENT VALUE
(acres) ($/Ft~) FACTOR ($)
Permanent Easement 0.023 $5.0 50% $2,500.00
TOTAL EASEMENT CASH SETTLEMENT AMOUNT $2,500.00
2. As set forth in the City of Meridian's Easement Acquisition Policy, the Grantor may choose from two options forjust
compensation for the permanent easement:
X Cash Payment* in the amount of
^ Donation value of the easement
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
*Grantor will receive payment for the permanent easement within four weeks following the recording of the
easement and acquisition of the easement preparation contract noted in Item 1 above.
3. GRANTOR also agees to provide the City with a 0.10 acre temporary construction easement adjacent to the permanent
easement for the purpose of constructing the proposed PRV and related incidental work. The temporary construction
easement shall expire upon completion of the PRV.
4. This Contract shall not be binding unless and until executed by the Mayor and/or their authorized representatives. The
parties have herein set out the whole of their ageement, the performance of which constitutes the entire consideration for
the granting of said easement and shall relieve the CITY of all further claims or obligations on that account or on account of
the location, Bade, construction and maintenance of the proposed sanitary sewer and potable water line.
5. The parties whose names appear below as Grantors, covenant and warrant that they are the OWNERS of the property to
which this document applies, are fully authorized to execute this document and forever bind themselves, their successors
and assigns and the subject property to the terms set forth herein.
IN WITNESS WEREOF, the parties have executed this contract the day and year first above written.
CITY OF MER1D[AN
./ / e¢PTIID AUCLS\
By: !~ GU44 !r
Tammy de Weer , yor r '2
cry°r
ATTEST: E IDIZ IANa
Jaycee Hol ,City Clerk ~onxo
°' SEAL
~07- ~.~
Date approved by Council: 9 / ~ ' , ~+'
~~'~~A<i&E~SII/
Page 1 of 2
GRANTORS
gy; T9~.., ` ~~
Logan P. Kinney
I ~ Se~ Lo!'~
Page 2 of 2
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 5D
PROJECT NUMBER: FP 12-018
ITEM TITLE: Reserve No. 2
Final Order for Approval: FP 12-018 Reserve No. 2 by ERD, LLC Located West of N.
Locust Grove Road and East of N. Jericho Road Request: Final Plat Approval of 14
Residential Lots and 2 Common Lots on 5.01 Acres in an Existing R-4 Zone
MEETING NOTES
~~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
C/C SEPTEMBER 4, 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE
REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT
APPROVAL OF FOURTEEN (14)
BUILDING LOTS AND TWO (2)
COMMON LOTON 5.01 ACRES OF
LAND FOR RESERVE
SUBDIVISION N0.2, LOCATED IN
THE SE'/4 OF THE NE'/4 OF
SECTION 30, T.4N., R.lE.,
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
CASE NO. FP-12-018
ORDER GRANTING FINAL PLAT
APPROVAL OF RESERVE
SUBDIVISION N0.2
BY: ERD, LLC
APPLICANT
This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Unified
Development Code 11-6B-3 on September 4, 2012, and the Council finding that the
Administrative Review is complete from Bill Parsons, Associate City Planner for the Planning
Division, and Scott Steckline, Land Development Supervisor for the Public Works Department,
dated: Hearing Date: September 4, 2012 to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having
considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Final Plat of "PLAT SHOWING RESERVE SUBDIVISION NO.2 WHICH
INCLUDES A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE 5E'/4 OF THE NE Y SECTION 30,
T.4N., R.lE., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2012, STAMPED
BY CARL PORTER, SHEETS 1 OF 3, SAWTOOTH LANDSURVEYING,
ORDER GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR RESERVE SUBDIVISION N0.2 (FP-12-018)
Page 1 of 3
LLC, ERD, LLC, DEVELOPER, " is conditionally approved subject to those
conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and
City Council from Bill Parsons, Associate City Planner for the Planning Division
and Scott Steckline, Land Development Supervisor for the Public Works
Department, dated: Hearing Date: September 4, 2012, listing nine (9) SITE
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS/FINAL PLAT and thirteen (13) GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked
Exhibit "A", and consisting of seven (7) pages, and by this reference incorporated
herein, and the response letter from Jon Wardle, a true and correct copy of which
is attached hereto marked Exhibit "B" and consisting of 1 page, and by this
reference incorporated herein.
2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the
City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's
requirements shall be signed only at such time as:
1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and
2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are
completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued
guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site
improvements.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAHINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the
ORDER GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR RESERVE SUBDIVISION N0.2 (FP-12-018)
Page 2 of 3
City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at
issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition
for Judicial Review maybe filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an
interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-
eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by
Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. ll '' //
Y'~'~
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~ day of
2012.
DATED this ~ day of , 2012.
/~ypT L'DA VVL\
Attest: /////o4Q ''z
3`'
n n cry oe
City Clerk r`Ae
~ ro, re a es°i
Mayo • my de Weerd
Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning Department, Public Works Department, and City
Attorney.
BY: Dated: ~ ' (~ ' ~ ~
ORDER GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR RESERVE SUBDIVISION N0.2 (FP-12-018)
Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A
STAFF REPORT
Hearing Date:
TO:
FROM:
September 4, 2012
Mayor and City Council
~~iQ/rE IDIAN~--
IDAHO
SUBJECT
Bill Parsons, Associate City Planner
208-884-5533
Scott Steckline, Land Development Supervisor
208-887-2211
FP-12-018 -Reserve Subdivision No. 2
I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant, ERD, LLC, has applied for final plat approval of 14 single-family residential building lots
and 2 common lots on 5.01 acres of land. The zoning dishict for the proposed subdivision is R-4
(Medium Low-Density Residential). The gross density of the proposed subdivision is 2.79 dwelling units
per acre; the net density is 3.12 dwelling units per acre. The average lot size is 11,847 square feet.
The subject property is located south of Chinden Boulevard between N. Locust Grove Road and N.
Jericho Road, in the NE'/o of T. 4N., R. lE., Section 30.
Open space provided in the subdivision includes two passive open space lots and 8-foot wide parkways
along the proposed local street (E. Commander Street): To utilize the existing water main constructed
with the first phase of the Reserve Subdivision, Staff is recommending an additional common lot be
provided to ensure the adjacent buildable lots (Lots 11 and 12, Block 1) are not impacted by the City's
20-foot wide water easement. This requirement has increased the amount of open space for the proposed
subdivision.
The City Council approved the annexation. (AZ-09-006) in 2009. The preliminary plat (PP-12-009) for
Reserve West Subdivision was approved by Council on August 7, 2012. The approved preliminary plat
consists of 14 single-family residential building lots and 2 common lots on 5.01 acres of land (Exhibit B).
Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for consistency with the approved prelhninary plat and found
there to be the same number of building lots and common area as shown on the preliminary plat. Because
the number of buildable lots has not increased and the amount of common open space has increased, staff
finds the proposed plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required by
UDCl 1-6B-3C.2.
II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Reserve Subdivision No. 2 fmal plat subject to the conditions noted
below. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the
City Council.
III. SITE SPECIFIC
Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation (AZ-09-006), development agreement
(instrument # 112030813), or as maybe modified by the City Council and the approved
preliminary plat (PP-12-007) applications for this subdivision.
2. The applicant has until August 7, 2014 to obtain City Engineer's signature on the final plat or
apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-6B-7.
Reserve SubdivisionNo.2-FP-12-018 PAGE 1
EXHIBIT A
3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the
accompanying aclmowledgementsignwi and notarized.
4. The final plat prepared by Sawtooth Land Surveying, dated August 23, 2012 by Carl Porter shall
be revised as follows:
a. Note #4and #10: Include instrument number;
b. The licensed surveyor shall stamp and sign the face of the plat;
c. The applicant shall incorporate the 20-foot wide water easement depicted on Lots 11 and 12,
Block 1 within a common lot;
d. Add a note to the plat that identifies the responsible party for the maintenance of the proposed
common lots (Lot 16, Block 1, Lot 11, Block 3 and the new common lot for the water
easement) within the Subdivision;
5. The applicant shall comply with the submitted landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts
Associates, dated August 23, 2012 with the following changes:
• The 8-foot wide parkways may be installed at the time of lot development as set forth in
UDC ] 1-6C-3H.
• The applicant shall incorporate the 20-foot wide water easement depicted on Lots 11 and
12, Block 1 within a common lot. Said common lot shall be planted with a mix of sln•ubs,
ornamental grasses and lawn.
• All landscape improvements proposed for the common lots must be installed prior to
releasing occupancy for any homes constructed within the subdivision.
Provide three (3) fall size copies of landscape plan with the aforensentioned changes prior to
obtaining City Engineer's signature on the final plat.
6. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from
the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of
mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Kimberly Cutler, at 887-1620 for more information.
7. All fencing installed on the site must be in compliance with UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7. If
permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary construction fencing to
contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release of building permits for this
subdivision.
8. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does
not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
9. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance
with the UDC.
IV. GENERAL REQUII2EIVIENTS
1. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, sewer line shall be
installed and passed air test and video inspection and final plat recorded prior to applying for
building permits.
2. All development improvements, including but not limited to water and sewer, shall be installed
and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy, or as otherwise allowed by UDC 11-
SC-1.
3. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat.
Reserve Subdivision No. 2 - FP-12-018 PAGE 2
EXHIBIT A
4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
5. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
6. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that
may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency.
7. All development features shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act.
8. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or
well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, asingle-point
connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,
the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to
si~rature on the final plat by the City Engineer.
9. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of
3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation.
10. The applicant's design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or
drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district
or the ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been
installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before
a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project.
11. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings
per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and
approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy fm' any structures within the
project.
12. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to
signature on the fmal plat.
13. 100 Watt and 250 Watt, high-pressure sodium street lights shall be required per the City of
Meridian Department of Public Works Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. All street
lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted to the Public
Works Department for approved. The street light contractor shall obtain the approved design on
file and an electrical permit from the Public Works Department prior to commencing
installations. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of
Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC.
V. I;XIIIBITS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Approved Preliminary Plat (PP-12-007)
C. Proposed Final Plat (dated: 8/23/12)
D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 8/23/12)
Reserve Subdivision No. 2 - FP-12-018 PAGE 3
EXHIBIT A
Reserve Subdivision No. 2 - FP-12-018 PAGE 4
>;xhibit A -Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit B -Approved Preliminary Plat (PP-12-007)
pvvrviv~crna.roe
THE RESERVE SUUO1VfSlON N0. TWO - - _,_
A PAPCO. N EWO WG~W 1LE 5S UI OY IIB AH N d' 9ECAdV .U,
iR. AIE. BY. NY W IQ1HIpYA'. IpI [pVXEY, fdy® '
A1lE I
~' ~, . _..1
I ~ ~x ~~ _i ~~, , ,r„~ ~
~
..
~s
.
4~
&OfX I , 118bGY I ~
4~
- i
m ..,,
"`"'"'°-°-- ~
a
ll ® o o ,o e o ~ o ~ ~~
Gr.~.„
^ ~~
a~8~
f
g
/
~
~
_-- --a~~_
-s.. , rr_~~~-
r~-~~!_se..,I,E.. .
~,y~_J:_-
L- ~r~ara.~....
`~l'.'0.9lIf6TS6
~__ __ 7 7
T
m
~
i~ x
g
~
g
-~
G~'_
P N T
C~
Sy
~ ~ l
'J
~ o++~w
Oy~C
^ y
=
=
Reserve Subdivision No. 2 - FP-12-018 PAGE 5
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit C -Proposed Final Plat (dated: 8/23/12)
RESERVE SUBDIVISION N0, 2
A PARCRL OF LINO UIGITRO IN fNR 58 1/9 OF 771E N6 t/4 OF SeGTIOA 50,
L4N, R.16„ RJI., CHY OP HA'RRNAN ADA GOUNTY, IDAHO
zD~z
...
•saranr 1eY.~.~..,.e..~.~..~.
N ~ ~,,.~
raRaAax~:
r;
PO
O [l(G
~M Ww GC+
~ ~~~+ ROCH 60LID CIVIL 1d9^v
~~
~
~~ ~wup~,
~
'^ m..~.eHO~ ~ r rrr ...
Reserve Subdivision No. 2 - FP-12-018 PAGE 6
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit D. -Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 8/23/12)
PLANT BGNEDULE DEVELOPPACNT PEATUREe LAND9LAPE LALLN.ATIONS
.."'y. .'lily. 'L'":"d.~~iR',..~... SSGSf ~.. !~'° 4W®°.
a ~¢ue~5R~1`
~ _
O iwle PLANTIlI6?sTAKINb
O
I~
THE RESERVE SUBDIVISION N0.2 .....~.~. ~
HERI DIAN
.IDAHO
FINAL PLAT LAN DSCAPE PLAN R041b410 CML
~' ~„jFy~,:-• rs~eRA
Reserve Subdivision No. 2 - FP-12-018 PAGE 7
Bill Parsons
From: Jon Wardle [jwardle@congergroup.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 12:30 PM
To: Bill Parsons; Jaycee Holman; JacyJones; Machelle Hill
Subject: RE: Reserve No.2 final plat staff report for 09/04/12 CC MTG
Bill,
We have reviewed the conditions for proposed Reserve Subdivision No. 2 Final Plat. (FP-12-018). We agree with the
written conditions.
Thanks,
Jon Wardle
CMG
1627 S. Orchard, Ste. 24
Boise, ID 83705
m: 208-577-8755
p: 208-336-5355
f: 208-336-2282
e: jwardleC~coneereroua com
Skype ID: wardlegroup
- _ _ -..
rom: Bill Parsons [mailto:bparsons@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:37 AM
To: Jaycee Holman; ]acy Jones; Machelle Hill; Bill Nary; Ted Baird; Jon Wardle; Jim Conger; Jake Centers
Cc: Peter Friedman; Bruce Chatterton
Subject: Reserve No.2 final plat staff report for 09/04/12 CC MTG
Attached is the staff report for the proposed Reserve Subdivision No. 2 final plat application(File #FP-12-018). This item
is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on September 4, 2012. The public hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E.
Broadway Avenue, beginning at 7:00 pm. Please call ore-mail with any questions.
Jan -Please submit any written response you may have to the staff report to the City Clerk's office
(Lolman(almeridiancity ore, mhill(a~meridiancitv.or¢, and liones(u~meridiancitv.ore) and myself (e-mail or fax) as soon as
possible.
Bill Parsons, AICP
Associate City Planner
Community Development Department
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642
PHONE: (208) 884-5533
FAX: (208) 888-6854
bpars ons@meridianci[y. org
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 5E
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Ratification of the Approval and Release of Beer, Wine and Liquor License Transfer for
Colco Investments Co., dba Bill n Lynns Place to Brigette S. Wallace dba Construction
Zone Bar & Grill Located at 229 West. Franklin Road
MEETING NOTES
~G~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 5F
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution No. ~a~' ~~~ A Resolution of the City of Meridian Amending the
Policy and Procedure Manual Policy 4.3.1 -Leave Pool for Family Medical Leave Act
(FMLA) Qualifying Event
MEETING NOTES
~~w~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 12- ~~a
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, HOAGLUN, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN TO AMEND THE CITY OF MERIDIAN STANDARD OPERATING POLICY
AND PROCEDURE MANUAL REGARDING NUMBER 4.3.1 -LEAVE POOL FOR
FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT (FMLA) QUALIFYING EVENT; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council have authority over the operations, policies, and
procedures for the City of Meridian;
WHEREAS the City has previously approved a Standard Operating Policy and Procedures
Manual in 2002 for application to all employees of the City;
WHEREAS the City Council may amend the Manual from time to time as necessary to
incorporate changes as needed;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF MERH)IAN, IDAHO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City of Meridian Standard Operating Policies and Procedures Manual is
hereby amended as to Policy 4.3.1 -Leave Pool for Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Qualifying Event; a copy of said policy is attached and incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A".
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and approval.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ~~ d y of
~ , 2012. )"L`
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ~~ day of
< , 2012.
APPROVED:
MayorT Weerd r9~
ATTEST: rry or
E IDIAN~--
By: ~c (SEA ° "°
W
a cee L olman, City Clerk Ayr .~
r ,~w
e
+l He iqE AAU0.
CITY OF MERIDIAN POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL AMENDMENT F ICY 4.3.1 -
LEAVEPOOL FOR FMLA QUALIFYING EVENT - 2012
CITY OF MERIDIAN
STANDARD OPERATING POLICY AND PROCEDURE
NUMBER 4.3.1
SUBJECT: LEAVE POOL FOR FMLA QUALIFYING EVENT (FMLA LEAVE
POOL)
PURPOSE: To define a vacation leave pool for employees that qualify for FMLA and have
exhausted all of their available leave.
POLICY: The City has established a leave pool available for FMLA
qualifying leave. This pool provides assistance to alleviate economic hardship
caused by the absence from work necessitated by FMLA qualifying event.
AUTHORITY & RESPONSIBILITY: Employees shall make appropriate requests
for use of the FMLA Leave pool. Human Resources shall be responsible for
administering and interpreting this policy.
PROCEDURE AND RELATED INFORMATION
I. ELIGIBILITY
All regular full-time employees are eligible to receive FMLA Leave benefits from the
pool. Employees must exhaust all of their eligible sick and vacation leave before being
eligible to use any donated leave. Employees may not receive any donated leave that
would allow them to exceed the maximum allowed leave under FMLA during the
qualifying period.
II. ALLOWABLE USE
A. Employees may donate some or all of their accumulated vacation leave to be used by a
designated employee with an FMLA qualifying event.
B. Hours may be available to employees upon written request from the employee, and a
recommendation by the Department Director, the Human Resources Director and the
Mayor.
C. The Department shall seek donation of hours from employee's department first and
then may seek additional hours up to the maximum allowed by this policy from all
employees.
D. The donated hours will be converted to the requesting employee's rate of pay.
E. To receive benefits an employee must:
1. Have been absent continuously from work due to an FMLA qualifying event;
2. Put the request in writing;
3. Employees must have exhausted all of his/her sick and vacation days;
4. Employees must provide a physician statement certifying that the employee has
an FMLA qualifying event to Human Resources.
III. OTHER PROVISIONS
A. As allowed by law, a second medical opinion may be required.
B. An employee cannot receive donated time after they have achieved the maximum
allowed FMLA hours in the event year.
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 6q
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
September 6, 2012
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Tammy de Weerd
City Council Members
CC: City Clerk
FROM: Caleb Hood, Planning Manager
RE: Downtown Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning
September 12, 2012 City Council Agenda Item
Over the past several months, ACHD and their consultant, Kittleson & Associates, Inc., in
coordination with City staff, spent time evaluating the bicycle and pedestrian needs in downtown
Meridian (Fairview/Cherry to I-84 and Linder to Locust Grove.) The result of this analysis is the
Downtown Meridian Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. The Plan guides the future development and
enhancement of pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the study area, and intends to make
walking and biking safe, effective, and convenient forms of transportation for residents of and
visitors to downtown.
The Plan was developed with extensive input from neighborhood residents and other
stakeholders and provides a guide for meeting ACHD's and the City of Meridian's goal for
neighborhoods to be pleasant and safe places to walk and bike. To achieve this goal, the plan's
recommendations are designed to meet the following objectives:
• People can conveniently walk or bike to their destinations.
• People feel safe walking and biking.
• Facilities are provided for all age groups and levels of mobility.
• Visitors are attracted to the enhanced walking and bicycling environment.
The Plan contains specific and feasible recommendations for new pedestrian and bicycle
facilities throughout greater downtown (see attached exhibits showing locations for
recommended pedestrian, and bicycle projects). This plan considers and incorporates previous,
related plans, including the City's Master Pathway Plan. There are 51 recommended pedestrian
projects listed in the Plan. Pedestrian projects include sidewalks, shared-use paths, and
intersection crossing improvements. There are 39 bicycle related projects listed in the Plan. Bike
Community Development Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642
Phone 208-884-5533 . Fax 208-888-6854. www.meridiancity.org
Page 2
projects include bike lanes or shared lane markings, bike routes, shared-use paths, and
intersection crossing improvements.
ACHD and the City of Meridian will use this plan as a resource and guide to implement
improvements in the downtown area that will make walking and biking safer and more
accessible. More specifically, City staff plans to reference this plan in Chapter 3 of the
Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, staff will review the Master Pathway Plan to see if some of
the recommendations from this Plan should be incorporated. The plan's uses may also include:
• Aiding agencies in prioritization of projects
• Identification of areas where further neighborhood input is necessary
• Identification of funding sources and partnerships
• Recommendation of changes to policies or programs
• Clarification of broader plans
Justin Lucas, the ACHD Project Manager for this project, will be at the September 18~h City
Council meeting to provide additional detail about the process to develop this plan and the
recommended findings. To review the entire Downtown Meridian plan, click here:
htto://www.achdidaho.org/Projects/Media/235/1606 Draft Downtown Meridian Plan 8.14.12.
Page 3
i~
~.~
~ 1:.
5 M
r
i^
r
trr
~i G
~x
s ~ -r ~ ~
~ ., ~
~ 3:
~ iwix~ i'~
keynt 511
Z .~
f
lA!
`
1 fii
~
~
7
,
,
,~ , ~
i ~ A ~~.~
~ {.
~
n
~~~
~ ~~~
~,~
c~
•o~
s
~~
~ y~
~' ~ K ~ ^
Page 4
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 7
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Items Moved From Consent Agenda
MEETING NOTES
`~~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $q
PROJECT NUMBER: PP 12-005
ITEM TITLE: Canterbury Commons
Public Hearing: PP 12-005 Canterbury Commons by Heartland Homes, LLC Located at
South Side of W. Pine Avenue, East of N. Ten Mile Road Request: Preliminary Plat
Approval of 107 Residential Lots and 12 Common Lots on 21.45 Acres in an Existing R-
15Zone
MEETING NOTES
~ ~~ ,~~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $g
PROJECT NUMBER: MDA 12-0
ITEM TITLE: Canterbury Commons
Public Hearing: MDA 12-002 Canterbury Commons by Heartland Homes, LLC Located
South Side of W. Pine Avenue, East of N. Ten Mile Road Request: Amend the Recorded
Development Agreement (Inst. # 106187188) for the Purpose of Removing Certain DA
Provisions That Are No Longer Applicable AND Adding New DA Provisions Relevant to
the Proposed Canterbury Commons Subdivision
MEETING NOTES
CL,, 9nr,. v'c.,'l
'iYl narlfi~im~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $C
PROJECT NUMBER: CPAM 12-003
ITEM TITLE: Olson & Bush
Public Hearing: CPAM 12-003 Olson & Bush by Ronald W. Van Auker Located at 2950
E. Franklin Road Request: Amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
Designation on 5.66 +/- Acres of Land From Commercial to Industrial
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
3TAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $p
PROJECT NUMBER: AZ 12-003
ITEM TITLE: Olson & Bush
Public Hearing: AZ 12-003 Olson & Bush by Ronald Van Auker Located at 2950 E.
Franklin Road Request: Annexation and Zoning a Total of 7.2 Acres of Land to the C-G
(1.41 Acres) and I-L (5.78 Acres) Zoning Districts
MEETING NOTES
~~~~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Coruncil Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $E
'! PROJECT NUMBER: CPAM 12-002
ITEM TITLE: Paramount East
Public Hearing: CPAM 12-002 Paramount East by Brighton Development Located West
Side of Meridian Road, Between W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road Request:
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to Change the Land
Use Designation on Approximately 12.90 Acres of Land from Office to Medium Density
Residential (MDR)
MEETING NOTES
~G~~w=mil
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $F
PROJECT NUMBER: RZ 12-001
ITEM TITLE: Paramount East
Public Hearing: RZ 12-001 Paramount East by Brighton Development Located West
Side of Meridian Road, Between W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road Request:
Rezone of 12.47 Acres of Land from the L-O (Limited Office) Zone to the R-8 (Medium
Density Residential) Zone
MEETING NOTES
~~_~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE F/NAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $G
PROJECT NUMBER: PP 12-002
ITEM TITLE: Paramount East
Public Hearing: PP 12-002 Paramount East by Brighton Development Located West
Side of Meridian Road, Between W. Producer Drive and E. McMillan Road Request:
Preliminary Plat Approval of 46 Residential Lots and Six (6) Common Lots on 12.90
Acres in a Proposed R-8 Zone
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $H
PROJECT NUMBER: CPAM 12-001
ITEM TITLE: TM Crossing
Public Hearing: CPAM 12-001 TM Crossing by Brighton Investments LLC, Steven Smith
and CRS10 Located Northeast Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Request:
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to Change the Land
Use Designation on 75.5 Acres of Land from LC (Lifestyle Center), MHDR (Medium High
Density Residential) and HDE (High Density Employment) to Commercial
MEETING NOTES
~'i l7/V\AE~
ra
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $~
PROJECT NUMBER: AZ 12-005
ITEM TITLE: TM Crossing
Public Hearing: AZ 12-005 TM Crossing by Brighton Investments, LLC, Steven Smith and
CRS10 Located Northeast Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Request: Annexation
and Zoning of 89.22 Acres of Land from the RUT Zoning District to the C-G (General
Retail & Service Commercial) Zoning District
MEETING NOTES
Qp~,~,u~ ~ C~„6';ti~~
Community ItemlPresentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: $~
PROJECT NUMBER: PP 12-003
ITEM TITLE: TM Crossing
Public Hearing: PP 12-003 TM Crossing by Brighton Investments, LLC, Steven Smith and
CRS10 Located Northeast Corner of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Road Request: Preliminary
Plat Approval of 50 Commercial Building Lots and Four (4) Common/Other Lots on
75.5 Acres of Land
MEETING NOTES
n~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E•MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: gq
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Mayor's Office: Letter of Support for the Meridian Anatomy and Physiology Laboratory
MEETING NOTES
~ /
a l~~u.~ ~ ~~ S
/~
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info.INotes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
September 14, 2012
President Arthur Vailas
Idaho State University, Administration Building
921 S. 8"' Ave, STOP 8310
Pocatello, ID 83209-8310
Dear President Vailas:
On behalf of the Mayor and City Council, I am writing
for an Anatomy and Physiology Laboratory to serve tht
laboratory is an important component to the continued,;
we urge your support for this addition to the campus;'
the request by ISU-Meridian
Valley. Having access to this
success ofISU-Meridian and
Since the ISU Meridian Health Science Center opened in August 2009 it has enjoyed continual
growth, yet the health profession students in Meridian do not 1}ave access to an;;anatomy and
~' physiology laboratory to meet their program needs. We know-that the health prbfession
industries will only continue to flourish and ISU-Meridian will see its enrollment numbers
continue to rise year after year. Certainly this laboratory would attract students to ISU-Meridian
who might otherwise be looking to attend a difl'ererit university with this type of facility.
In addition, having an Anatomy ffnd Physiology Laboratory at,ISU-Meridian will help solidify
the mission of The CORE, our industry cluster that iS"building business and restoring our
economy through research and innovation inthe-health, research and technology sectors. This
laboratory is a need for the area and The CORE. As.our higher education partner in this industry
cluster, these are the types of partnerships that will ensure the success of this dynamic coalition.
As outlined by the Idaho. Sate Board of Educations"`Idaho State University is a doctoral
university serving a diverse population through research, state and regional public service,
undergraduate:and graduate programs." Vie are confident that granting the request to build an
Anatomy and Physiology Laboratory at ISU-Meridian will maintain, and even advance, ISU's
health sciences mission as an entire institution and we look forward to the success the Meridian
campus will enjoy with this laboratory for its current and future students.
Thank you for considering this request and we look forward to our continued partnership in
educating students and building businesses here in Idaho.
Sincerely,
Tammy de Weerd
Mayor
Mayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642
Phone 208-888-4433 Fax 208-884-8119. wwmi maridiancity nrn
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 10A
PROJECT NUMBER: RZ 11-001
ITEM TITLE: McNelis Subdivsion
Ordinance No. ~o~~[_~aT: On Ordinance (RZ 1 1-001 McNelis Subdivision)
for the Rezone of a Parcel of Land Located in the SE Y< of Section 34, Township 4N,
Range 1 W, Establishing and Determining the Land Use Zoning Classification for 16.24
Acres of Land from the L-O Zoning District to C-G Zoning District and .43 Acres of Land
from the L-O District to the I-L Zoning District and Providing and Effective
MEETING NOTES
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich AMOUNT .00 8 ~
BOISE IDAHO 09119/12 03:41 PM
DEPUTY Bonnie Oberbillig III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'I I III
RECORDED-REQUEST OF
Meridian Ciry 112096133
CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. ~02' /~a1
BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, HOAGLUN, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA
AN ORDINANCE (RZ 11-001 MCNELIS SUBDIVISION) FOR THE RE-ZONE OF A
PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SE '/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4
NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND
ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY
OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING
AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 16.24
ACRES OF LAND FROM THE L-O (LIMITED OFFICE) ZONING DISTRICT TO C-
G (GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT AND
.43 ACRES OF LAND FROM THE L-O (LIMITED OFFICE) ZONING DISTRICT TO
I-L (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE;
PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE
ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO
STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BYLAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A
SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE
READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO:
SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description
herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" is within the corporate limits ofthe City ofMeridian,
Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re-zoning by
the owner of said property, to-wit: Ten Mile Center, LLC.
SECTION 2. That the above-described real properly is hereby re-zoned from the L-O
(Limited Office) zoning district to the C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial) zoning district,
and from the L-O (Limited Office) zoning district to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district in the
Meridian City Code.
SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the
Ordinances of the City of Meridian zone said property.
SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the
laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to re-zone said property.
SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well
as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of
the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance.
RE-ZONE -ANNEXATION - RZ 11-001 MCNELIS SUBDIVISION Page 1 of 3
SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled.
SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication, according to law.
SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the
effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a
draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of
Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file
simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission ofthe State
of Idaho.
SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the
Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading
in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full
force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication.
PASSED Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this
~~day of , 201~2~
APP OVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ~~
day of , 2012
RE-ZONE -ANNEXATION - RZ 11-001 MCNELIS SUBDIVISION Page 2 of 3
STATE OF IDAHO, )
ss:
County of Ada )
2o1Z
On this ~ day of S2~!-embc,/ > 291, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public
in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY de WEERD and JAYCEE L. HOLMAN,
known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and
who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed
the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
,...,
(SEAL) . °g`?1CTAJO~''
•
•
~`
;sj; .jOCIgLlG, ~o:
.gl~: p.:pP~O
TARP PUBLIC FOR1D Ifs O
RESIDING AT: h-{end~o~v. I I~
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: IAN d , 2p~~
RE-ZONE -ANNEXATION - RZ 11-001 MCNELIS SUBDIVISION Page 3 of 3
EXHII6IT A
Legal Description
IDAHO use F~rzN3°rrnwx m
Sulu ISO
SURVEY MN1din• ~° ~6e
GROUP rl,om (~ aleasro
F°s pOq astsi»
Protect No. 17.018
L-0 TO bl. REZONE
McNELIS SUBDMSION
March ill, 2011
A parcel of land located in the SE1J4 of Section 34, T.4N:, R.1 W., B.M., Ade
County, Idaho, more partiwlarly described as follows:
Commencing at the comer common to Sedlons 2 and 3, T,3N., R.1 W., and
Sections 34 and 35, T.4N., R,1W., B.M., ham which the E114 tamer of acrd Sediwi 34
bears North 00'77'36' East, 2843.52 feet;
thence abng the South boundary line of said Sedlon 34 North 89°43'00" yyesf,
934.84 feet;
thence leaving sold South bouMary Ilne North 97°25'41" West, 731.83 feet tD the
NW comer of Lot 2, Bock 2 of McNelie Subdfvfabn as filed in Book 100 of Pleffi al
Pages 130821hrough 13084, records of Ada County, Idaho;
thence abng the north boundary 8ne of aekl Lot 2 South 89°43'00' Fsat, 379.54
feet to an angle point 41 the North boundary Ilne of said Lat 2;
thence continuing along aekl north boundary line Soudt 80°59'58' East, 128.78
feet to the REAL POINT OF BEOINNIND;
thence leaving card north boundary line South 88°43'00' East, 195,34 feet to e
point on the northweetedy dghlof-way Ilne of MrNalis Drive, said point also betngthe
beginning of anon-tangent curve to the rlgM;
thence along said northwesterly right-of-way Ilne the fdbwing 9 coureea;
along Bald curve 279.77 feet, said curve having a rediue of 427.00 feel a central
angie of 37°32'25" and a bng chord of 274.79 feet whidr bears North 39'28'12' EseY
thence North tiB'14'25"East. 244.90 feet to the beginning of a curve to the righk
thence slang Bald wive 128.99 feat, said curve having a radius of 227.09 feet, a
central angle o} 32°03'10" and a brg chord of 125.34 feat which bears NorBr 74.16'00"
Eesk
thence leaving saki norlhwestady right•of-way line Saulh 17°35'09" West, 30.00
feet ko a paint on the canffidine of McNelia Drive;
tFiance abng said centadine the tollowtng 9courses;
S:VSO Pmf°aWMmdi, 9°61U30°M°°"_.. """ablLlacEx -„r°INl
EXHIBIT A
thence North 89'42'25" West, 4.79 feet to the beginning of a curve to the lefk
thence along sold curve 111.89 feat, said curve having a redius of 200.00 feet, e
central angle of 32°03'10' and a bng chord of 110.45 feat vihkh beats South 74°16'OlY'
Went;
thence South 68°14'26" Wsst, 238.45 feettc the beginning of a curve b Ste left;
thence along said curve 273.28 feet, saW curve having a redlua of 400.00 feet, a
central angle of 39°08'32" and a long chord of 287.86 feet vihkh bears South 38°40'09"
west:
thence leaving setd catter9ne NoAh 80°50'56" West,12B.48 feet to the REAL
Pt71NT OF BEGINNING, wntalning 18,522 square feet, more or less.
S.
REV ~~
DY
~ ~ ~ 2on
MEflI~IAN PUBLIC
WORKS nEpT~
sNSO rmtxwnfo-d~ sub nm.eo°°~ne,Wdlw nZoxa« hpz~3
EXHIBIT A
IpAHO
SURVEY
GROUP
1430 Fi¢ Wiwtmwr Y
a,rt.lso
MeridWtMdw 87612
PAanrr f1~ B16BSA
For pae7 PoI-5799
Project Nc.11-018
4-Ci ZQNE
IAaNEUS SUBDNISION
March 9, 2011
A parcel of land located in fhe SE1l4 of Se7d'wn 94, T,4N„ R.1W., B.M., Ade
County, Idaho, more perticulerty desorfbed as tolbws~
Commencing at the corner common to SacGOns 2 and 3, T_3N., R.1 W., end
Sactlona 34 and 35, T.4N., R.1 W.. B.M., from wh{oh the E7l4 corner of saki Section 34
bears North 00°17'35" East, 2843.fi2 feet
thence along the South boundary line of saki SecBon 34 Nodh 89°43'00' West
278.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING;
(hence can5nuing along sold South boundary Ilne North 80°43'00" Wesi, 858.94
feet;
d7or5ce leaving said South boundary 5ne North 37'25'41° West 731.83 feet to the
NW tamer of Lot 2, Black 2 of McNells Subdivision as filed in Book 100 d Plats at
Pegea 13082 through 19084, rewrda of Ada County, Idaho;
ther7oe along Ure North boundary line of Bald Lot 2 South 69 43'00° East 370.54
feet to an angle point In the North boundary Iine of saki Lot 2;
thence con8nuirg along said nortll boundary line and Use southeaetedy exDansbn
thereof South 8r7`50'S8" East, 259.19 feet to a point on the centerline of McNelis Drive,
eakJ print also being the beginning 01 anon-tangent arve to the dghk
thence along said cenfadine the following 3 coureea;
thence etong saki curve 273.20 teal, said curve having a redius of 400.00 feet, a
cenhal angle of 39°08'32" and a long chord of 267.98 feet which bears North 38`40~DB'
East;
thence North 58° 14'25° Eest 238.45 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right
thence along Bald curvc 111.89 feet, said curve having a redius of 200.00 feet a
cenUal angle of 32°03'10° and a long chord at 110.43 feat whk:h bears North 74°18'00"
East;
Ihenee oenlinuing along said-oenterttne and the easterly e7del7sbn 9lareof Soulh~ ~~ - - -
89°42'25" East 247.32 feet;
9.N9e PrgiMNd°m11~3ub~l, W CQZa".d°c hp ] «:
PAGE 22
EXHIBIT A
thence South OD°17'35" West, 490.04 teat;
thence along the North boundary Ilne of Lot 3, Bock i of Bald McNelis
8ubdfvfslon and the easterly extensian thereof North 89°43'06" West, 259.00 feetto the
NW comer of said Lot 3; -
thence along the West boundary Ilse of Lote 3 and 4, Bbck 1 of saki McNeRa
Subdlvlslon end the southerly extension thereof South 00°17'35" West, 476.00 feet to
the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, oontalning 18.24 apes, mare or less.
Prepared By:
Idaho Survey Group
Gregory G. Carter, P.L.S.
pRW~
HB
pY ~ I W X051
thE~fl~ pE~C
au9a r~lmw®mi°sm x~°ro~°°wn~ws a z~ea nsx °r:
EXFIIBIT B
YIl,11Y ~~~
~s4.~--~__._y~rysj~ml..x ....
" ~ci~er * 1 e
~ llaiE
~uaear N
a5ea
~& BpyNpFRr
W9'lY_.W_ ID~~
~ 111c T
LS
t
CI
IE
` ,
k Y 1
g
V
•
• p
g
~
~
/tlYB 40 1p hL
.'
A
~
O~
N wLW ~
\ f
~i\ Dd ISM[
REYI R~~ t~
• ~~-
-
BY-'~ 6,~tL
w
~ 1 ~ ZUIt ~
µER+DIAN Puellc
WORKSpEpT.. _
_ ~~
N
tl
Cuw a0b nK Ti151E
yy pN
,y
CI ig9t 1~ 151.0 N r
Ci
Ci
c. 100.
imoo li
rlxv
mae IISOi
texi5
nc
a • w ~
L5 eii.00 ,Ii i 4A
w mac lav Iaae 5
LwE ls.c
ueI nl Ixa
LI 1P.16
LI Icy 5y(E
U 106. i•e
..Net ~~..
1
N ~-
ric c[icr~
e
eiP' + 2Rt05'
>! l
~ e
l~ Q W Ili[
i i ~ i
I ~~
~'
an.~v~"iarLA01i -- ~ ~-.-.~
N
O ~~.
d 729 ~
N'f~ 3'ID,II Z~ .~ 1,
~~ TF of t~ ~4Q'
~Q4V G. CPQ'
GEN
-"-"-"'-"'---- REZCNE BOUNDANY LINE
LOT LINE SCALE: 1 ° = 2501
_ _ ~ _ _ _ _ r SECTION LINE
w~Yrrpaow r..lwami uwavA•~ Nav ela.rv.N
IDAHO EXHIBIT DRAWING FOR 'i°l,-a""~
I~'~>flllggR. (51CNEL15 SUBDIVISION REZONE "a
SURVEY ~ aN,~o,L, ~
GROUP, P.C. LOEAIN xi na u v. a xoroN x ux„ lLlc eu, aw cert
Wwrul uu IfeMH nVn .1A0/11
Meridian City Council Meeting
DATE: September 18, 2012 ITEM NUMBER• 11
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Future Meeting Topics
MEETING NOTES
i
Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS