HomeMy WebLinkAboutMayfair Commons Sub RZ 03-011December 15, 2003
RZ 03-011
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING December 18, 2003
APPLICANT Wildwood Development, LLC ITEM NO. 8
REQUEST Public Hearing Request for a Rezone of 9.34 acres from I -L to R-15 zones for proposed
Mayfair Common Subdivision — 1125 East Pine Street
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
No Comment
OTHER: See attached Affidavit of Posting
Contacted:
COMMENTS
CZs comme�
is �lC-
Date: Phone:
Emailed: Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
I„
�'��.
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
c�' .t _7,
/ CITY of fs'�`'_
(208) 466-9272 •FAX 466-4105
PARKS & RECREATION
^vff
(208) 888-3579 •Fax 898-5501
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
/f�Y /A1
(VLl/�VL
LIC
Tammy de Weerd
IDAHO
j
(208)898550WOR887-1297
William L. M. Nary
y
-%
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Cherie McCandless
FCE�
(208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
Keith Bird ° �` Taensuae v.u,y swce PLANNING & ZONING
l�soa (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerks Office
Attn: Will Berg, City clerk, by: November 13, 2003
Transmittal Date: September 30, 2003 Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
File No.: RZ 03-011
Request: Rezone of 9.34 acres from an I -L zone to R-15 zone for Mayfair Commons
Subdivision
By:
LLC
Location of Property or Project: 1125 East Pine
David Zaremba, P/Z (No vAR, VAC, FP)
Jetty Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Come, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No vAR, vac, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
Ity Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FP)PPonly)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP only)
U.S. West (FP/PPoMy)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PPonly)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County (Annexationordy)
Ada County Land Records (FPiPPonty)
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical Preservation Commission
R,ECEIVEID
OCT 3 1 2093
'Litt' Of-Nleridiar3
City Clerk Office
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE - MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 • Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 • Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
cm -e
CONGER MANAGEMENT GROUP
is
Letter of Transmittal
' December 10, 2003
Scott Beecham
-111111 Mayfair Commons
111 , Will Berg
' Meridian, City of
I R 33 E. Idaho Street
Meridian, ID 83642
We are sending you:
Ecp'.'
DEC 1 3
Oity Of 1411..
?ity Clerk
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑ For Review & Comment ❑ For Your Approval ❑ Make Changes Noted
❑ Sign & Return Original ® Copy for Your Records[:] Original for Your Records
❑ Sign & Return Copy ❑
Remarks:
Copy To: Wendy Kirkpatrick Signed:
Conger Management Group
405 South 81h Street, Suite 131, Boise, ID 83702 • Phone (208) 336-5355 • Fax (208) 336-2282
STS POSTE -G AtrIDA:VITT
STATE OF IDAHO )
COUNTY OF ADA ))
(tee) (address)
(city)
upon oath, depose and say:
being first duly sworn
Development applications, consisting of a rezone, planned development and
Preliminary plat, have been submitted for the property located at 1125 E. Pine
Street, Meridian, Idaho 83642.
2. A Notice of Public Hearing sign will be posted on the subject property not less
than 10 days prior to the scheduled public hearing.
The Posting will contain the name of the applicant, description of the
application, and time and date of public hearing.
Dated this '-7 . *t day of t- l Y 200 3 .
(Si
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written
,• o ? Notary Public for Idaho
T,oTO f
Residing at 7v
puBl'l S
..•r���. My Commission Expires: �/ /o ff
'.,,2. ..., 19Ao•�
Scott Beecham - CMG
From:
Sue Cook [sue@sueacookdesign.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, December 02, 2003 11:22 AM
To:
'Scott Beecham - CMG'
Subject:
Emailing: PIC_0029.JPG, PIC_0030.JPG, PIC_0031.JPG,
PIC_0032.JPG, PIC_0033.JPG,
PIC_0034.JPG
M
19
19
PIC_0029.JPG (61
PIC_0030JPG (50 PIC_0031.JPG (62 PIC_0032.JPG (52 PIC_0033.JPG (36
PIC_0034.JPG (34
KB)
KB)
KB) KB) KB)
KB)
here's a bunch to pick from
sue
=� , �. � ��-. � �Y�_
v kx� ST. ti1Tfi�C .
�'
1
�'
y
4
�l"E� Sigt)Er ttaa�.
Ada County Highway District
& Development Department
Planning Review Division
This application requires Commission action due to the size of the development. This item was approved by
the Commission on Wednesday August 6, 2003 at 12:00 noon. The applicant revised the site plan on
October 7, 2003 and the Commission's determinations are incorporated within the revised site plan. The
revised staff report was completed on Friday October 15, 2003. Tech Review for this item was held with the
applicant on Friday June 27, 2003. Please refer to the attachment for request for reconsideration guidelines.'
Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 208 -387 -6177 -phone, 208 -387 -6393 -fax, atuning@achd.ada.id.us
File Numbers:
Mayfair Commons/MPP03-031/MCUP03-057/MRZ03-011
Site address:
1125 East Pine Street
DFCBnT ;, F)
Owner:
Montague-Saurial, LLC
5660 North Star Ridge Way
0 E i ';yi
Meridian, Idaho 83642
CITY O
Applicant:
Wildwood Development, LLC
523 Rumpel Lane
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Representative: Conger Management Group
405 South 8th Street, Suite 290
Boise, Idaho 83702
Application Information:
The applicant is requesting rezone, conditional use and preliminary plat approval to construct a 38 -lot mixed-
use subdivision on 12.74 -acres. The subdivision is proposed to contain 35 -multi -family lots, 3-indutrial lots
and 17 -common lots. The site is currently zoned I -L and is proposed to be rezoned to R-15. The site is
located on the south side of Pine Avenue approximately'/4 of a mile west of Locust Grove Road.
Acreage:
Current Zoning: I -L
Proposed Zoning: R-15
Buildable Lots: 38 -lots
Common Lots:
Vicinity Map
15-detahced 4-plexes
20 -attached 4-plexes
3 -industrial lots
17 -lots
A. Findings of Fact
Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 1,194 additional vehicle trips per day (0
existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.
Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building
permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that
time.
3. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application.
4. Site Information: The site is currently vacant.
5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
a. North: Danbury Fair Subdivision and
Eastside Addition to Meridian Subdivision (single-family residential subdivisions)
b. South: Union Pacific Rail Road
c. East: Sante Subdivision (single-family residential) and
Railside Park Subdivision (industrial park)
d. West: Onwiler Subdivision (single —family parcel with 1.17 -acres and 6.4 -acres
6. Impacted Roadways
Pine Street:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Level of Service:
Speed limit:
Commercial Avenue:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Speed limit:
415 -feet
Collector
East of Meridian Road was 3,767 on 7-26-00
East of Locust Grove Road was 7,048 on 11-13-02.
Better than "C
30 MPH
60 -feet
Local commercial street
Not available
30 MPH
Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site
Pine Street is currently improved with 2 -traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site.
Commercial Avenue is improved with 2 -traffic lanes with curb, gutter and sidewalk.
8. Existing Right -of -Way
Pine Street currently has 50 -feet of right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline).
Commercial Avenue currently has 60 -feet of right-of-way (30 -feet from centerline).
9. Existing Access to the Site
The site currently takes access from a driveway that intersects Pine Street approximately 20 -feet east
of the west property line.
2
10. Site History
The District has not previously reviewed an application for this site.
11. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program
There are no projects within this area that are scheduled in the District's Five Year Work Program or
Capital Improvements Plan.
B. Findings for Consideration
Right -of -Way and Sidewalk
District policy requires 70 -feet of right-of-way on collector roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-
way width allows for the construction of a 3 -lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5 -foot wide detached
sidewalks and bike lanes.
The adjoining road is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five -Year
Work Program or in the currently adopted 20 -year Capital Improvements Plan. As such, the
applicant cannot receive reimbursement for dedicated right-of-way from available collected impact
fees. The applicant shall do one of the following:
a. Dedicate by donation a total of 35 -feet of right-of-way (from the centerline) along Pine Avenue, and
construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Pine Avenue, located a minimum of 28 feet
from the centerline of the right-of-way.
b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Pine Avenue, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an
easement provided to the District.
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Pine Avenue, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary
adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities.
2. Driveways
District policy 72-F5, requires driveways (and private roads) located on collector or arterial roadways
with a speed limit of 30 to align or offset a minimum of 125 -feet from any existing or proposed
driveway.
District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles
to a maximum width of 35 -feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb -cut type
facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15 -foot radii will be required for
driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways.
Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked
onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant Should be required to
pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the
roadway and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway that intersects Pine Avenue approximately 150 -
feet east of the west property line and aligns with Stonehenge Way. This driveway location meets
District policy and should be approved with this application.
3
The driveway is proposed to intersect Pine Avenue and extend to the south and eventually intersect
Commercial Avenue. The District does not encourage connections between two public roads and
recommends that the route be as circuitous as possible.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 30 -foot wide driveway that intersects Commercial Avenue
approximately 140 -feet east of the west property line. This driveway meets District policy and is
approved with this application.
3. Stub Streets
District policy 7203.5.1 and 7205.5 requires stub streets to provide intra -neighborhood circulation and
to provide access to adjoining parcels. District policy also requires temporary turnarounds with a
temporary easement provided to the District at the end of stub streets that serve more than one lot, or
are greater than 150 -feet in length with a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, 'THIS
ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE".
The applicant is proposing to extend Commercial Avenue from the east property line and extend it to
the west property line. Staff is supportive of the extension of Commercial Avenue. Due to the fact
that Commercial Avenue is greater than one lot in depth and greater than 150 -feet, that applicant
should construct a temporary turnaround easement at the terminus of Commercial Avenue or on
Stonehenge Way (the private road). The applicant should also install a sign at the terminus of
Commercial Avenue stating that, 'THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE".
4. Street Sections
District policy 7204.4.2 states, "developments with any buildable lot that is less that 1.5 -acres in size
will typically provide streets having a minimum pavement width of 32 -feet with curb, gutter and
sidewalks. The total street width shall be 36 -feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Variations of this
width may be allowed, depending on traffic volumes forecast to be generated by the development.
Concrete sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5 -feet in width unless they are separated from the curb 5 -
feet or more in which case the sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4 -feet in width.
The applicant is proposing to construct Commercial Avenue as a 36 -foot street section with curb,
gutter and sidewalk within 50 -feet of right-of-way. Commercial Avenue is currently constructed as a
40 -foot street section within 60 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant should taper Commercial Avenue
from the existing 40 -foot street section to the proposed 36 -foot street section.
5. Other Access
Pine Street is a classified roadway. Other than the access point that has specifically bee approved
with this application, direct lot access to Pine Avenue is prohibited. Notes of this shall be noted on
the plat.
C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall do one of the following:
a. Dedicate by donation a total of 35 -feet of right-of-way (from the centerline) along Pine Avenue, and
construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Pine Avenue, located a minimum of 28 feet
from the centerline of the right-of-way.
M
b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Pine Avenue, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an
easement provided to the District.
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Pine Avenue, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary
adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities.
2. Construct a (30 -foot wide maximum) driveway that intersects Pine Avenue approximately 150 -feet
east of the west property line and aligns with Stonehenge Way, as proposed.
3. Construct a 30 -foot wide driveway that intersects Commercial Avenue approximately 140 -feet east of
the west property line, as proposed.
4. Pave the driveways their full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of
the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
5. Extend Commercial Avenue from the east property line and extend it to the west property line.
Construct a temporary turnaround easement at the terminus of Commercial Avenue or within the
private road. Install a sign at the terminus of Commercial Avenue stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE
EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE".
6. Construct Commercial Avenue as a 36 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 50 -
feet of right-of-way. Taper Commercial Avenue from the existing 40 -foot street section to the
proposed 36 -foot street section.
7. Other than the access point that has specifically bee approved with this application, direct lot access
to Pine Avenue is prohibited. Notes of this shall be noted on the plat.
8. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
D. Standard Conditions of Approval
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with
Ordinance #197, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in
the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other
regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises
the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the
time the change in use is sought.
E. Conclusions of Law
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are
satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines
M
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff
or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request
reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously
requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried
out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties.
a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration,
but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners
present.
If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a
certain time.
b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later
than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following
the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request,
the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled
regular Commission meeting.
c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new
facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has
developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or
law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting.
d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it
occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD
staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter
is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting
where the agenda notice so provides.
e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action,
interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the
President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take
any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable.
If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover
administrative costs, as established by the Commission.
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE December 18, 2003 ITEM #
PROJECT NUMBER RZ 03-011
PROJECT NAME Mayfair Commons Subdivision
NAME (PLEASE PRINT)
FOR
AGAINST
NEUTRAL
Sha
4YVL//
2 /ml,
R
Conger Management Group
rcE��'
Mayfair commons Subdivision
DEC 18 2001-
Planning
00?Planning & Zoning commission CITY OF
December 18, 2003
Introduction
Project Overview/Background
■ Applications —The applications before you tonight represent a redesign
and re -submittal of a previous application on the same property. These
applications are as follows:
o Rezone of 9.34 acres from I -L to R-15
c CUP on 9.34 acres for a planned residential community, and
o Preliminary Plat on 12.74 acres consisting of 38 building lots and
17 other lots
The revised development proposal is the result of numerous meetings with
staff and neighboring property owners.
We feel that these applications are an improvement to the original
application and we respectfully request your recommendation for
approval.
General Comments
■ Compatibility with neighborhood
o Neighbor Meetings
o Site Plan modifications
o Landscape Plan modifications
o Building construction modifications
Traffic
o Staff comments relative to internal and external traffic concerns
o Re -design of plat to eliminate direct connection between
Commercial and Pine
o Positive ACHD report
o Roadway system improvements to Pine and Locust Grove
Requested Modifications to Staff Report
• Landscapelssues
o Condition 12 requires the use of sod rather than seed. Represents
a significant increase in cost with little or no benefit in the finished
product. Sod is actually harmful in drainage facilities.
o Landscape Plan error. The landscape plan identifies plant materials
south of Commercial that were erroneously placed on the plan.
Under site specific comment #6, we would request that the
commission allow the applicant to work with staff to revise the plan
to correct that issue.
Setbacks
o Request approval of setbacks as submitted as Exhibit A to the
Conditional Use Permit Request
o Typo - Side yard setback is identified as 7.55 feet and should be
7.5 feet
Clarification Items (may require modification of staff report)
■ Latecomers Fee (Site specific condition #1)
o Paid at building permit vs. signature of the final plat ... what does
code require? We are currently paying latecomer fees at building
permit
Phasing (Site Specific conditions Vs 3, 5, 7, 16, 17 and 18)
o Intend to phase the project and will submit a phasing plan 10 days
prior to the next public hearing
o Site Specific comments Vs 3, 5, 7, 16 and 17 address different
issues that will be tied to phasing
o Does phasing tie directly to final plat or can we break up a single
plat into construction phases that only require improvements (such
as landscape, parking lot striping, amenities, etc.) within the
specific construction phase
o Need to understand the implications on obtaining certificates of
occupancy
o Condition 18 — contiguous property issue. Intend to develop the
industrial lots at the south end of the property at the same time we
begin residential development along Pine. The residential
development will be phased and we want to ensure that this
condition does not preclude that as they will not be immediately
contiguous
Construction Method (Site specific condition #21)
o Slab on grade vs. crawl space... condition should not apply
o We think that we will meet the required separation of 3 feet, but the
finished floor elevation is dictated by the floodplain rather than the
crawl space elevation
"Special Considerations"
CUP Open space requirements (100 s.f.)
o Plan proposes 30°% common open space (+/- 2.8 acres)
o Plans include private deck/patio space for each unit
o Plan also consists of 2,500 — 3,500 s.f. of private yard area per
building depending on plan... exceeds the requirement
o Condition typically applies to single family PUD developments
o Request that the commission recommend approval of the site plan
and building plans as submitted.
BASALITE° #ffifflft
CONCRETE PRODUCTS 18 2003
-® BOISE, IDAHO - 0_
NOVEMBER 18, 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
C/o City Clerk
-- Meridian City Hall -- -
33 East Idaho
Meridian; ID 83642
Attn: Commissioners;
I am writing to comment on the proposed "Mayfair Commons Subdivision"
which is again coming before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission for
consideration. Several months ago I appeared in person to comment, and presented our
concerns as a business operating in the industrial zone adjacent to this proposed project. I
will be unable to attend this November 200'hearing because I will be out of town on
business. Please accept these comments on behalf of Basalite Concrete Products, a block
and brick manufacturing company located at 1300 E. Franklin Road, Meridian, Idaho.
Since the original proposal was presented several months ago (at which time the
re-zoning request was denied) I was called upon by the developer of this proposed
"Mayfair Commons" project. This meeting took place approximately two months ago.
In that meeting the developer proposed a revision to the original plan which included
some commercial sites on the southern end of the property (directly adjacent to our
property) and residential buildings on the northern end. I commented at that time that
this would be an improvement from our perspective, but that I still had reservations about
mixing residential development so close to industrial sites.
I still have strong reservations about this project going forward. Complaints from
residents in theapartmentscould lead to future restrictions on our-business and other--- -----
businesses on
---businesses-on operating hours. These types of restrictions have been placed on other
block manufacturing plants in other states even though the manufacturing plants existed
long before residential development occurred. Having the flexibility to operate 24/7 if
needed is crucial to the competitiveness of this business.
Furthermore, some children living in close proximity to industrial areas do not
respect "No Trespassing" signs and will find ways to entered restricted areas to play on
1300 E. FRANKLIN ROAD , MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4050
material and equipment or commit vandalism. This creates a real cost to area businesses
and, more importantly, a significant danger to the children.
Mixing commercial/industrial zoning designations with residential zoning is not
good policy for existing and future businesses, nor is it good policy for the residents who
may move into these areas without really understanding the potential for noise and the
attractiveness of industrial sites for children to explore. Truck traffic can also pose a
significant danger to children who are playing in areas around their apartments that are
near industrial sites.
For these reasons I want to go on record as opposed to this development. Thank
you for considering these continents.
Best regards,
Mark Smith
General Manager
RECEWMI
''�� V 18 2003
44116rU000 �ii8 yq UZ M& toys 587 1707
Precisioncraft
LOG
Homes
711 East Broadway - Meridian, Idaho 83642
208 887-1020 (ph) 20S 887.1253 (fax)
.iyounp. ,Praisicncrafr.com
DATE: November 18, 2003
TO: Meridian Planning and 2
FROM: Jim B. Young, President
SUBJECT: Wildwood Development,
Dear Commissioners,
Precision Craft manufacturing facility is
Mayfair Commons Subdivision. We are
from industrial to residential.
We respectfWly request the Commission
rea_aens to separate residential from indw
used its good judgment to previously der
be taken for this application,
Sin ely�
im B. Young, President
NOV 18 '03
13:23 .2 — — —
DEPT. + City Clerk Q001
Craft Z ool
RECEIVED
NOV 18 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
�a-z Mtn.
11-2b-03
I�NDUM Ikcr-ls 1102,13
�I
it.14e end of Broadway near the proposed
D proposed rezoning of the subdivision
'thisapplication. All of the logical and valid
are applicable in this case. The Connais, has
oning of the property, We urge the same :cation
2088886854 PAGE.01
RECEIVED
NOV 18 2003 18 November 2003
City OClerk ridiOffice
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission:
This letter is in reference to Mayfair Commons Subdivison. My residence is directly East of this
proposed subdivision.
I am very much opposed to having multi -family or single family residences at this location. If this
rezoning is approved it would greatly effect the value of my property. When we bought our place ten
years ago that property was zoned I -L. That was one of the reasons we bought where we did. We
assumed we would not have to worry about residences. We have a very nice home and lot. It is very
quiet and peaceful. I would like it to stay that way.
At this time East Pine has all the traffic it can handle. We do not need anymore!!
The address that Wild Wood Development is using for this property is incorrect , 1125 E. Pine is MY
address!! !
I would appreciate it if the commission would consider my views.
Richard H. Collins
1125 E. Pine
Meridian, Idaho
887-0083
RECEIVED
NOV 18 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Atm: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
RECEIV91)
f.1 6 V 1 21003
CITY OF MERIDIAN
C'T'y AC1 FRK OPFI(-
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
ss7-/s39
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
.RECEIVED
2 e 2003
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFICF
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
I�GvS &/Zi � -W LLQ
�t/1 G4.� tuCc L YA.tk�,�� L�-L
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
.RECEIVEp
O
NU°V N 2303
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CI FRK nFF1CF
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would'
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
�Wr V P.(Sov�l� s5
�CL'P-A-
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
RECEIVED
2 u 2003
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLFRK OFFrr
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
C� "O�00—
fi%w SPjac C� -s4. Xn c,
% // 11% �2�Lsf•µ
fAe-rt4 tA' � j .TD $30191Z
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
IRECEIVE
+L's 1 G 2003
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK nFFICF
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank on,
2, - 0 6
boli �GtySe' /wG y6ry-&,nL,.
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
RECEIVED
LW
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CJ_FRK OFFICF
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ren at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied
Thank you,
�.ytc. �tniee Con.pl�-x Qus�r.�sS q,,�ners /3Lsn
8U-- a s aq
)Of- ?Y) IV, R41s�r�
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
RECEIVE
`0V 1 �nj 2003
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CL FRK rFFIC'F
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24n work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
/% y cru -4
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
DEce1V�
2003
C1Ty
CI fYLOFR� R DIAN
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
7q5 N,, @Is; -
(3t ��� �-
1P39 —gooy
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
2069
OITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY cI FRK OFFI
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied. I t
Thank
Z /
7P44r-5
(ZoB� g9� o �jZ to
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
.RECEIVET)
JL
xw i
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY 0; FRK tiFFlf F
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
8'66- a�b l
November 17, 2003 RZ 03-011
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING November 20, 2003
APPLICANT wldwood Development, LLC ITEM NO. 11
REQUEST Public Hearing - Request for a Rezone of 9.34 acres from I -L to R-15 zones for Mayfair
Commons Subdivision - 1125 East Pine Street
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
COMMENTS
St'taNached -40;' comrver-d-
See attached Comments
No Comment
No Comment
No Comment
No Comment
No Comment
P4-YlotiCe
-cor 12A �-l63
c,4i 8z<c.4xf-Vyx Date: 11111107 Phone: 3310 -G3$5VA'
Staff Initials: a
Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian.
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
MAYOR A Good Place to Live
Robert DILME CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
33 EAST IDAHO
Keith Bird
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Cherie MCCmdless
(208) 888-4433 - FAX (208) 8871813
City Clerk Office Fan (208) 888-4218
William L. M. Naty
STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 - FAX 888-6854
To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission I M CEI V ED
From: Wendy Kirkpatrick, AICP, Associate City Planne wk-NOV 14 2003
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech City Of Meridiark n
Re: Mayfair Commons
• Zoning of 9.34 Acres from I -L to R-15 (High Density Residential), by
Wildwood Development, LLC (File No. RZ-03-011)
• Preliminary Plat Approval of 38 Building Lots and 17 Other Lots on 12.74
Acres in proposed R-15 (PD) zone by Wildwood Development, LLC (File No.
PP -03-031)
• A Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development on 9.34 Acres to Allow
Reduced Setbacks, Parking Standards, and Dimensional Requirements by
Wildwood Development, LLC (File No. CUP -03-057)
We have reviewed the aforementioned applications and now offer the following comments,
as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
The Applicant, Wildwood Development, has requested the zoning of 9.34 acres of land located
at 1125 East Pine Street. The land is presently zoned I -L (Light Industrial). The Applicant has
requested that 9.34 acres of the subject property be zoned to R-15; the remainder of the property
will remain zoned I -L.
The applicant has previously submitted an application for this project. The original Mayfair
application was withdrawn by the applicant prior to the scheduled Planning and Zoning hearing.
The original application was a rezone of 12.74 acres to R-15, featured a different road
configuration, and did not include any light industrial lots.
The applicant's preliminary plat request is for 35 multi -family residential building lots, 3 light
industrial lots and 14 other lots, including 10 garage/ storage lots and 4 common lots. The multi-
family lots include 15 attached and detached 4-plex buildings. The "other" lots include ten
nu3-011, er-03-031. cur -m -M may9v Commons. Az PP.CwmD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 2
garage and storage lots and four common lots, including three open space lots consisting of 2.86
acres and one drive aisle/ parking lot. The proposed gross density is 15 d.u./acre. The plat
includes 2.86 acres of open space, or 30% of the gross land area.
The Applicant has also requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development (PD) on the multi -family residential portion of the project only. The proposed
industrial lots are not part of the PD application. The purpose of the PD application is to allow
alternative development standards, including reduced residential building setbacks, reduced lot
frontages, and a deviation from parking standards. Following is a comparison of the City's
minimum R-15 requirements and the reduced requirements that have been proposed by the
Applicant through the PD application
Setbacks- City Requirements (R-15) Proposed Setbacks
Front: 20' Front: (Multiplex) Front Stairs: 9'
Front Building: 14'
Rear: 15'
Side: 5'/per story
Street side: 20'
Comer Lots: 20'
Lot Size- City Requirements
R-15 zone: 2,400 sq.ft.
Lot Frontage-City_Requirements
50'minimum
Parking -
LOCATION
City 4nt
2 spaces per unit
(Garage/ Storage) 0'
Rear: 15' for Multiplex
Garage / Storage: 0'
Side: 7.55' (Multiplex)
Side: 0' (Storage)
Street side: 10'
Comer Lots: 10'
Proposed Lot Sizes
2,400 sq. ft.
Proposed Frontage
0'
Proposed Parking
1.5 spaces per unit
The property is located at the 1125 E. Pine Avenue.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Pine Street borders the subject property directly to the north. Danbury Subdivision, a
single-family residential subdivision, is located north of Pine Street and is zoned R-4.
South: Union Pacific Railroad tracks border the subject property directly to the south, property
south of the railroad tracks is zoned I -L.
East: Santee Business Park is located directly east of the subject property and is zoned I -L.
RZ-03411, PP -03-031, CUP -03.091 Meyw Cwwons. A . PP.CUPIPD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 3
West: Single-family residential zoned RI (Ada County.)
ZONING ANALYSIS
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both
the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances
of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate
evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment."
The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff:
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds that the requested zoning designation of R-15 is harmonious with and
in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and Generalized Land Use
Map, which designates the land to be "Mixed Use Community."
B. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
The area has been designated as a Mixed Use Community area in Meridian's
Comprehensive Plan. These Comprehensive Plan designations in combination
with the L -O and R-15 zoning directly east and south of the subject property make
the proposed zoning of the property compatible with surrounding land uses and
the City of Meridian's plan for the development of the area.
C. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed uses are compatible with the existing and intended
character of the area. The Comprehensive plan designates the area as Mixed Use
Community; the proposed mixture of high-density residential uses is compatible
with the Comprehensive Plan designation. Staff finds that the proposed uses can
be designed and constructed in a manner that will be harmonious with and
appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the
surrounding area.
R7,0341 1, PP -03.031, CUP -03457 Mayfair C�. A7 PP-CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 4
D, Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony to determine
whether or not the proposed use will be disturbing or hazardous to the
neighboring uses.
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed uses will be hazardous or disturbing to
future or existing neighbors.
E. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the subject property can be served adequately by all essential
public facilities and services.
F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to, the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds that there will not be additional requirements at public cost and that the
zoning will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare.
G. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff finds that the proposed uses will create additional traffic, especially on Pine
Street. The southwest corner of the proposed development is located in the
floodway. No construction will be allowed in the Five Mile floodway. The
remainder of the subject property is located in the floodplain and will be subject
to all applicable regulations found in Section 10-6-5 of the MCC.
H. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff finds that the proposed vehicular approach on Commercial Avenue and the
proposed vehicular approach on Pine Street have the potential to interfere with
traffic on the surrounding streets.
HZ03-011, PP -03A31. CUP -03-057 Meyf& Conmxms. AZ. PP.CUPMD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 5
Ada County Highway District's comments should be considered when making
this finding.
L Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
Staff finds no natural or scenic features of major importance will be lost or
damaged by approval of rezone request. A portion of the subject property is
located within the Five -Mile Floodway and the remainder of the property is
located within the 100 -year Floodplain (zone AE; known flood elevations).
J. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592,11-17-1992)"
Staff finds that the proposed of this property would be in the best interest of the
City by increasing the variety of housing types available in Meridian.
ZONING COMMENTS
1. The legal description submitted with the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission
2. The requested zoning designation of R-15 is compatible with the City Comprehensive Plan
and Meridian's Zoning Ordinance.
3. A Development Agreement will be required as part of this rezone request.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed
subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the
following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan;
As noted above, staff finds that the subdivision conforms to the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan addressing parks and housing. See Zoning Analysis Comment C
above.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development;
Staff finds that public services are, available to accommodate the proposed subdivision.
The developer will extend existing water and sewer mains to the subject property.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
RZ-03-011, PP -0}031, CUP -03-057 Abyf w C. AZ. PP.CUPIPD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 6
Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds; the developer will extend urban services to the subject property.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing
supporting services; the developer will extend urban services to the subject property.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
Staff finds that a portion of the subject property is located in the floodway and the
remainder of the subject property is located in the 100 -year floodplain and will be subject
to all flood hazard reduction standards found in section 10-6-5 of the Meridian City
Code. Approximately half of lot one, block 2 is located in the floodway and will be
undevelopable. Additionally, Section 10-6-6 of the MCC restricts the storage of
hazardous materials in the floodplain.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
N Stonehenge Way: The applicant is proposing to connect two public streets (E. Pine Avenue
and E. Commerce Avenue) with a parking lot drive aisle (N. Stonehenge Way.) Staff has
serious concerns regarding the safety of the proposed parking lot drive aisle. The location of
the proposed parking lot drive aisle between Pine Avenue and Commerce Avenue will bring
cut -through traffic into the proposed housing development. Staff has concerns over the
potential for cut -through traffic on the Private Road and the danger this traffic would present
to residents of the planned development. The applicant has submitted a new configuration
for the road connecting E. Pine Ave. and E. Commercial Ave. The new configuration
features a curve in the road. The previously submitted road configuration which was
opposed by staff featured a straight road which directly linked E. Pine Ave and E.
Commercial Ave. Staff is in favor of the new configuration which has been submitted by the
applicant. The configuration of the parking lot drive aisle and planned development features
parking stalls immediately adjacent to the proposed parking lot drive aisle. This
configuration will result in cars backing out of their parking stalls into the parking lot drive
aisle, a potentially dangerous situation.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (preliminary slat)
Sanitary sewer service to this site will be from an extension from the existing main in E.
Pine Avenue. The applicant will be responsible to construct lateral sewer mains to and
through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and
routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer mains will not be allowed within
landscape areas, beneath landscape islands, and manholes will not be allowed in parking
and loading areas. This development shall be subject to latecomers' fees to reimburse
R 03-01 I, PP -03-031. CUP -03.057 Mayfev C�. AZ PP.CUP/PO
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 7
those responsible for bringing sewer service to the area. Payment of the latecomer's fee
shall be required prior to signature on the final plat map.
2. Water service to this site will be from an extension of existing water mains in E. Pine
Avenue and E. Commercial Avenue. The applicant will be responsible to construct water
mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate
main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department.
3. The developer shall be required to install all trees within each phase of the development prior to
any Certificates of Occupancy being issued.
4. Fencing details shall be submitted with the Final Plat application. Fencing adjacent to
pathways or the common area lots shall not be over four feet in height if constructed of a
solid material, and shall not be more than four feet in height if it is non -sight obscuring.
A solid, 6 -foot high perimeter fence shall be installed prior to any building permits being
issued, unless agreed to otherwise in writing by the Planning Director.
5. All parking lot striping must be completed prior to occupancy.
6. All landscaping must be consistent with the approved landscaping plan.
All required amenities must be installed prior to occupancy.
8. Each storm drainage lot may have only one rock sump. The maximum dimension of the
rock sump may be only 5'.
9. All landscaping must be maintained in accordance with ordinance 12-13-17.
10. All parking stalls and drive aisles must meet parking standards as outlined in Section 11-
13 of the Meridian City Code.
11. All access roads and micropaths on the subject property must be constructed of dust -free
materials. These materials may include: washed gravel, recycled asphalt, asphalt or
concrete.
12. Sod will be required for all areas indicated as lawn on the landscaping plan.
13. Landscaping will require a separate bond from other items bonded for by the applicant.
14. Slopes in drainage areas shall not be greater than 3 to 1.
15. All trash enclosures must be shown on the site plan.
16. The required landscaping and irrigation system shall be installed prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for any building on any lot created by the subdivision.
Landscaping and fencing must be bonded for prior to applying for building permits.
& 03 11. PP- 031. CUP -03.059 Meyfw Camnmm. AZ PP.CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 8
17. No phasing lines were shown on the preliminary plat. If phasing is planned, applicant
shall submit a revised plat prior at least 10 days prior to the next public hearing showing
the proposed phase lines.
18. The phasing schedule shall apply to the residential portions of the subdivision only. If the
applicant/developer determines that the of6cetcommercial property can or should be
developed in an order that is not consistent with the phasing schedule, they may request
final plat approval of said phases in a non -sequential manner without revising the
preliminary plat. All development, however, must be contiguous to a previously approved
phase.
14. Underground pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. The
applicant has indicated that the pressurized irrigation system within this development is
to be owned and maintained by the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District.
20. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-
round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection
to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the
developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior
to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer.
21. The initial soils/groundwater investigation report dated May 14, 2003, submitted with the
application indicates that groundwater levels are very shallow. Please submit all updated
groundwater/soils monitoring data to the Public Works Department. All drainage areas
(detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is retained only during
100 -year storm events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within
drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. The project engineer should pay close attention to the
results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics
during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that
the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established
normal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl
spaces of homes is at least 1 -foot above groundwater
GENERAL COMMENTS (preliminary Plat)
1. The proposed development is located in the floodplain and a portion of the subject
property is located in the Five Mile floodway. The development must comply with all
provisions for flood hazard reduction as outlined in Section 10-6-5 of the Meridian City
Code.
2. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's final approval letter
for the subdivision name, and the lot and block numbering. Make any corrections
necessary to conform.
3. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
RZ03-011, PP -0}031, CUP -03-057 Mayfw Com ,A7. ".CUP/PO
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 9
4. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing,
pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. A
separate letter of credit or cash surety will be required for landscaping.
5. Two -hundred -fifty and one -hundred -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be
required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be
installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire
hydrants.
6. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per
City Ordinance 12-4-13. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans
will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users
association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works
Department.
Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Sections 9-14 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
Any drainage areas (detention / retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is
retained only during 100 -year storm events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24
hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1.
9. Graphically depict any FEMA flood plain boundaries. Note restrictions associated with
the flood zone on the face of the preliminary plat.
10. Performance specifications for the common area pressurized irrigation system shall be
submitted with each Final Plat application.
STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each
proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditional use permit if
they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open
spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by this
ordinance;
Staff finds that the subject property's size of 9.34 acres is large enough to accommodate
the proposed residential development and all other required features if the applicant is
granted deviations from parking requirements through their Planned Development
application. The applicant is providing 2.86 acres of open space and is proposing a
density of 15 dwelling units per acre. The Planned Development standards require that
each unit have 100 sq. ft. of useable private open space or that the applicant provide .....
RZ03.011, PP -03031, CIP-0 W Mayfl& Cmmnorm. AZ PP.CUIPD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 10
for each dwelling unit or have this requirement waived by Meridian's City Council— this
open space shall be depicted on the site plan and/ or building elevations submitted to City
Council.
The applicant is proposing to provide 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit (MCC requires
2 spaces per unit.) Although parking standards are not noted as a specific item that can be
changed, the purpose statement of the Planned Development ordinance supports this
request by the applicant for a deviation from the parking standards.
B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance;
The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as Mixed Use -
Commercial. The proposed high-density residential development is harmonious with and
in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. The project meets the requirements and
objectives of the Planned Development Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to include
10% open space and a "sport court" to meet the requirement for two amenities for the
planned development.
C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character
of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential
character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed uses will be compatible with other residential and light
industrial uses in the general neighborhood and the existing and intended character of the
general vicinity.
D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,
will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed project will have an adverse impact on the
surrounding property; however, the Commission and Council should consider any
testimony given at the public hearings before making this finding.
E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of
proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services;
Staff finds that the proposed development is considered infill development and can be
adequately served by essential public facilities including: streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer.
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public
R7,0341 1, PP -03-031, CUP -03-057 Wyf , Cm. AZ PP.CUP/PO
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 11
cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic
welfare of the community;
Staff finds that the proposed use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the
community, nor would it create the need for any new facilities or services to be paid for
by the public. The developer will extend urban services to the subject property.
G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment,
and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare or odors;
Staff finds that the proposed configuration of the planned development and its parking lot
drive aisle has the potential to be detrimental to persons, property and the general
welfare by producing excessive traffic crossing through the subdivision between
Commercial Avenue and Pine Avenue
H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be
so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff finds that the proposed use will create significant interference with traffic on the
surrounding public streets. The Council and Commission should refer to the ACHD
report for additional information concerning this finding.
I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed
by issuance of this conditional use. Nearly all the subject property is located within the
Five -Mile Floodplain area.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
The applicant is proposing a deviation from the MCC's parking requirements of 2 spaces per
dwelling unit. The applicant is proposing to provide 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit due to the
number of one bedroom and studio dwelling units that have been proposed for the planned
development. Staff supports this deviation from the parking standards for this planned
development.
Section 12-6-2 of the MCC requires:
"All residential planned developments shall provide each dwelling unit with at least one
hundred (100) square feet of useable open space, such as a patio or deck. The Commission
and council shall judge each project on its own qualities, and may recommend deviations
RZ03-011, PP -0}031, CUP -03-057 3fsyfair Cimu . AZ PP.CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 12
from this open space requirement when it is satisfied that the private and common open space
proposed meets the intent and purpose of the ordinance"
The applicant has proposed a deviation from this requirement of the MCC, Commission and
Council should determine whether the applicant's proposal qualifies for this deviation from
required open space.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Conditional Use Permit)
1. Applicant shall meet all of the requirements of the preliminary plat as a condition of the
Conditional Use Permit.
2. At least 10 days prior to the next public hearing, the Applicant shall submit a detailed
plan for the proposed park and tot lot.
3. A revised site plan and/or elevations depicting 100 sq. feet of useable open space per
dwelling unit must be submitted at least 10 days prior to City Council.
4. All development shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act.
5. No building permits shall be issued within the development until a Final Plat has been
recorded for the subdivision.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
Chapter VI, Goal 1% Objective A, Action 3.:
Provide a variety of park types (neighborhood parks, regional parks) interspersed
throughout the community.
The development's proposed park and "sport court" meet the intent of this Comprehensive Plan
Action
Chapter VII, Goal V, Objective A, Action 4:
Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes and
multi -family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for
all income groups in a variety of location suitable for residential development.
The proposed high-density residential development and its mix of studio, one -bedroom and two-
bedroom apartments meet the intent of this Comprehensive Plan Action. The proposed rental
RZ03M 1, PP -03-031, CUM3457 Mgfev Commmu. A2. PP.CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 13
residential development will help to diversify the types of housing available in Meridian by
providing additional housing choices.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, rezone, and planned
development applications with conditions of approval.
RZ-03411, PP -03-031, CUP -03-057 Mayfair Couvoow. AZ. PP.CUPIPD
MAYOR
l'HIEF
ROBERT D. CORRIE
KEN W. BOWERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
DEPUTY CHIEF - FIRE PREVENTION
WILLIAM t.. M. NARY
ag. !!i
JOSEPH SILVA
KEITH BIRD
4.'�
DEPUTY CHIEF - TRAINING
TAMMY DE WEERD
CHERIE MCCANDLESS
y
BILLJOHNSON
RURAL FIRE COMMISSIONERS
V/ C Its,
In xrd l,�
540 East f -r mkhn Raaf
RICHARD GREENE_�
. i�
blclidian II) 8364_
TERRY LEIGHTON
_
STEVE ELLIOTTffq.I
F__- ~..'�.`-�"'"
Fax (208) 890390
MERIDIAN CITY/RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
RECEIVED
November 10,
2003
NOV 12 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
TO:
Mayor, City Council and Meridian Planning & Zoning
Commission
FROM:
Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention
SUBJECT:
Mayfair Commons RZ 03-011, CUP 03-057, PP 03-031
The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of fire
protection for the proposed project:
1. That a fire -flow consistent with Appendix D of the International Fire Code be
provided to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of
350' apart.
2. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required
before combustible construction begins.
3. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian
Water Department.
4. Final approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department
thru the Public Works Department.
5. All radii shall be 28' inside and 48' outside radius for all entrances and internal roads.
6. All fire lanes shall have an unobstructed width of 20'. No Parking will be allowed on
all internal access roads which are less than 20' wide.
11
7. The proposed project will have an undetermined transient population. Based on
historical run analysis the Meridian Fire Department will respond to one call for service
for every 24 people in the service area. This will generate an undetermined number of
calls for service at build out. According to a report completed by Fire & Emergency
Services Consulting Group in February of 2000 our requests for service are projected to
reach 2800 in the year 2005 and 3800 by the year 2010, this is up from 2069 responses
in the year 2000.
8. Any driveway over 150' long will require an approved tum -around.
9. Any building with more than 6 units or more than three stories will be required to be fire
sprinklered.
r;
11/11/2003 02:35 8885052
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
SANITARY SERVICES
PAGE 03
/
,
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 • FAX 466.4405
CITY oft' : -. -
e/ L ✓L l liZ l L _i `w`L'
V
IDAHO
y
PARKS RECREATION
(208) 688-3579. OPFax 898.5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 - Fox 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887.2211 • Fax 887-t297
Kcirh Bird ti1n v l,�o PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 - Paz 888.6954
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: Novembi
Transmittal Date: September 30, 2003
File No.: RZ 03-011
Request: Rezone of 9-34 acres from an I -L
By: Wildwood Developmei
Location of Property or Project: 11
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC. M
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, PIZ (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, vAc, pp)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR. VAC. FP)
Robett Come, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
_,,Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, PP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
2003
Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
zone for
Meridian School District (No Fp)
Meridian Post Office (FP/Pponly)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Inig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (Fpipp only)
U.S. West (FPrPPonly)
Intermountain Gas (Fp/PP only)
Bureau of Reclamation (Fppponly)
Idaho Transportation Department (Nn Fp)
Ada County (Annexation oMy)
Ada County Land Records (rm3p o*)
Meridian Development Corporation
Histodral Preservation Commission
City Attorney Your Concise Remarks:
City Engineer
City Planner 1RTJENCE CO [P
Parks Department , C -"&Q
RECEIVED COMMENIS:-t�cdtGZr,4,s-M-L_
NOV 12 2003
Citf MeridiaD
City°Clerk Offi e
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN. IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888.4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 - Human Resources Fax (208) 884.8723 • Finance 8: Utility Billing Fax (208) 887.4813
NOU 11 '03 14147 8885052 PAGE.03
16 October, 2003
William Berg
3 'r alroAve.
Meridian, ID 83642
i
RE: Rezone for Mayfair Commons
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
RECEIVED
OCT 2 2 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Dear Will:
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above referenced
application for Rezone of 9.34 acres from an I -L zone to R-15 zone for Mayfair
Commons Subdivision.
Thank you,
Bill Henson
Asst. Water Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
BH/dbg
C: Water Superintendent
File - Office/Shop
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
Ge
CENTRAL
DISTRICT
HEALTH
DEPARTMENT
Rezone #
Conditional Use #
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Environmental Health Division Return to:
RECEIVED ❑Boise
Preliminary / Final / Short Plat
OCT 10 2003
Office
0/&-a�4ir r�a�s^n.•o.rJ dsl
❑ Eagle
❑ Garden City
,� (s4eridian
❑ Kuna
❑ ACZ
❑ Star
We have No Objections to this Proposal.
❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of:
❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics
❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other
❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
❑ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well
❑ interim sewage ❑ central water
❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water
❑ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality:
❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water
❑ sewage dry lines ❑ central water
❑ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center
❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store
❑ 14. Please see attached stormwater management recommendatations Date: l0 I �3
❑ 15, Reviewed By:
Review Sheet
CDHD WOO Ikc
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
CITY OF }I
eYIGl�1 i -n
� v
IDAHO
ec
ery� Y
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 - FAX 466-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 868-3579 - Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 - Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297
Keith Bird q a, Trsensune Vr.� SINCE PLANNING & ZONING
,1903 (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6954
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: November 13, 2003
Transmittal Date: September 30, 2003 Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
File No.: RZ 03-011
Request: Rezone of 9.34 acres from an I -L zone to R-15 zone for Mayfair Commons
Subdivision
By: Wildwood Development LLC
Location of Property or Project: 1125 East Pine Street
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAc, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No vAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Corrie, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
K ' h Bird, C/C
erie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
REC
oci
Your Concise Remarks:
Meridian School District (No Fp)
Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (Fp/pp only)
U.S. West (FP/pPonly)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonty)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP onry)
Idaho Transportation Department (No Fp)
Ada County (Annexation only)
Ada County Land Records (FP/pp onry)
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical Preservation Commission
Mllfflmi
City Of Meridian CiIl i ikk MERIDIAN
City Clerk Office WASTEWATER DEPT.
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE - MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 - (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 - Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 - Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
CITY OF
Il IDAHO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 - FAX 466-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579 - Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 - Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297
PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by:
November 13, 2003
Transmittal Date: September 30, 2003 Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
File No.: RZ 03-011
Request: Rezone of 9.34 acres from an I -L zone to R-15 zone for Mayfair Commons
By:
Location of Property or Project
LLC
David Zaremba, P/Z (No vAR, VAC, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (Ivo VAR, vac, FP)
Leslie Mathes, PIZ (No vAR, vAc, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No vAR, vAc, FP)
Keith Borup, PIZ (No vAR, vac, FP)
Robert Come, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
ird, CIC
here McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, vac, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
RECEIVED
OCT - 2 2003
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Img. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP ony)
U.S. West (FPiPPonly)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PP only)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PPo*)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County (Annexation o*)
Ada County Land Records (FPA2P only)
Meridian Development Corporation
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE - MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 - (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 - Human Resources Fax (208) 884.8723 - Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
Sharon Smith
From: Sharon Smith
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Tara Green; Jessica Johnson; Will Bergv) Z
Subject: RE: Mayfair Commons RZ / Nov 20, 2003 P & Z Comm / i I i1
Anna called back on this matter -- the old sign was still up with the old hearing date,
but the new sign was indeed square in the middle of Mr. Collins' yard. This will have to
be re -noticed for a later date. Wendy was going to call Scott Beecham and let him know.
-----Original Message -----
From: Anna Powell [mailto:powella@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Sharon Smith; 'Bill Nichols'
Subject: RE: Mayfair Commons RZ / Nov 20, 2003 P & Z Comm
Sharon and Bill,
I checked the County records, and both properties are actually listed as
1125 E. Pine Ave on the '03 tax roll. (They have made the Mayfair
property 1127 on the '04 tax roll.) The applicant did use the correct
parcel number.
The only remaining question is whether they need to re -notice because of
the incorrect sign placement. Wendy is headed out to the site to see
exactly where they did post the property. They should have posted on
Pine and at the end of Commercial Avenue. I know we have required
re -noticing recently in a similar situation; I'm not sure if it matters
on how close the sign was to being in the correct location, or if it
matters that another sign was posted at the correct location.
Any thoughts?
Anna
Anna Borchers Powell, AICP
City of Meridian Planning Director
-----Original Message -----
From: Bill Nichols [mailto:wfn@WHITEPETERSON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:23 AM
To: 'Sharon Smith'; Anna Powell (E-mail); Brad Hawkins -Clark (E-mail);
Will Berg; Tara Green
Cc: Kristy Vigil (E-mail); Jessica Johnson; Bill Nichols
Subject: RE: Mayfair Commons RZ / Nov 20, 2003 P & Z Comm
Better find out from Beacham what happened. If the published notices
used
an incorrect street address did they use the correct legal description,
or
correct assessor's parcel number? Beacham or his sign company needs to
act
quickly because posting the sign without permission from a property
owner
may be criminal trespass.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sharon Smith [mailto:smiths@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:16 AM
To: Anna Powell (E-mail); Brad Hawkins -Clark (E-mail); Will Berg; Tara
Green
Cc: Kristy Vigil (E-mail); Jessica Johnson; Bill Nichols (E-mail)
1
Subject: Mayfair Commons RZ / Nov 20, 2003 P & Z Comm
Richard Collins came into our office this morningupset that the sign
posting this project was set in his yard while he was on vacation the
last
couple weeks. He lives at 1125 East Pine Ave, next to this project. He
is
the property owner.That is the address used on the Mayfair Commons
applications.
Questions: Is it ok to use the nearby address, it was listed on the
applications as being the project address. it probably should have been
listed as being "Next To 1125 East Pine Ave."
Does this need to be renoticed as the sign was posted on the wrong
property?
I have a message into Scott Beacham, have not yet heard back from him.
Mr.
Collins is afraid the posts have gone thru his sprinkler system & will
be
asking the applicant to repair the damage.
Sharon Smith
Meridian City Clerks Office
Ph. 888-9933 ext 210
2
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE November 20, 2003
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
NAME (PLEASE P
RECEIVED
NOV 2 0 2003
C;i ty Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
ITEM # 11
RZ 03-011
Mayfair Commons Subdivision
FOR IAGAINSTINEUTRAL