HomeMy WebLinkAboutMayfair Commons Sub CUP 03-057December 15, 2003 CUP 03-057
MERIDIAN PLANNING &, ZONING MEETING December 18, 2003
APPLICANT Wildwood Development, LLC ITEM NO. 10
REQUEST Public Hearing — Request for a Conditional Use Permit for multi -family residential
subdivision requesting reduced setbacks, parking standards, and dimensional requirements in a
proposed R-15 zone for proposed Mayfair Commons Subdivision — 1125 East Pine Street
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT.
CITY SEWER DEPT.
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
No Comment
Date:
COMMENTS
Staff Initials:
to C[L
Phone:
Motedala presented at publk meetings shall become properly of flw City of Merldian.
MAYOR
Robert D. Conde
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
CITY OF _
t' IDAHO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 • FAX 466-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 •Fac 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: November 13, 2003
Transmittal Date:
October 7. 2003
Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
File No.: CUP 03-057
Request: Conditional Use Permt for multi -family residential sub requesting reduced setbacks parking standards
& dimensional requirements in a proposed R-15 zone for proposed Mayfair Commons Subdivision
By: Wildwood Development, LLC
Location of Property or Project: 1125 East Pine Street
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, PIZ (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Come, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No vAR, vac, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FP)PPonly)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FPmP onry)
U.S. West (FP)PPonly)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP)PP only)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County (Annexafion only)
Ada County Land Records (FP)PPonry)
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical Preservation Commission
RECEIVEr
OCT 3 1 2003
City Of Meridiaxc
City Clerk Office
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 • Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 • Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
Ada County Highway District
toght-of-Way & Development Department
Planning Review Division
This application requires Commission action due to the size of the development. This item was approved by
the Commission on Wednesday August 6, 2003 at 12:00 noon. The applicant revised the site plan on
October 7, 2003 and the Commission's determinations are incorporated within the revised site plan. The
revised staff report was completed on Friday October 15, 2003. Tech Review for this item was held with the
applicant on Friday June 27, 2003. Please refer to the attachment for request for reconsideration guidelines.'
Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 208 e, 208 -387 -6393 -fax, atuning@achd.ada.id.us
File Numbers:
Mayfair Commons/MPP03-031/MCUP03-057/MRZ03-011
Site address:
1125 East Pine Street
`
Owner:
Montague-Saurial, LLC
PCETVT,
ll��'i
5660 North Star Ridge Way
DEC 18 G1^;j3
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Applicant:
Wildwood Development, LLC
CITY OF
523 Rumpel Lane
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Representative:
Conger Management Group
405 South 8'h Street, Suite 290
Boise, Idaho 83702
Application Information:
The applicant is requesting rezone, conditional use and preliminary plat approval to construct a 38 -lot mixed-
use subdivision on 12.74 -acres. The subdivision is proposed to contain 35 -multi -family lots, 3-indutrial lots
and 17 -common lots. The site is currently zoned I -L and is proposed to be rezoned to R-15. The site is
located on the south side of Pine Avenue approximately Y of a mile west of Locust Grove Road.
Acreage:
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Buildable Lots:
Common Lots:
Vicinity Map
I -L
R-15
38 -lots
15-detahced 4-plexes
20 -attached 4-plexes
3 -industrial lots
17 -lots
A. Findings of Fact
1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 1,194 additional vehicle trips per day (0
existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.
2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building
permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that
time.
3. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application.
4. Site Information: The site is currently vacant.
5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
a. North: Danbury Fair Subdivision and
Eastside Addition to Meridian Subdivision (single-family residential subdivisions)
b. South: Union Pacific Rail Road
c. East: Sante Subdivision (single-family residential) and
Railside Park Subdivision (industrial park)
d. West: Onwiler Subdivision (single —family parcel with 1.17 -acres and 6.4 -acres
6. Impacted Roadways
Pine Street:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Level of Service:
Speed limit:
Commercial Avenue
415 -feet
Collector
East of Meridian Road was 3,767 on 7-26-00
East of Locust Grove Road was 7,048 on 11-13-02.
Better than "C"
30 MPH
Frontage: 60 -feet
Functional Street Classification: Local commercial street
Traffic count: Not available
Speed limit: 30 MPH
7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site
Pine Street is currently improved with 2 -traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site.
Commercial Avenue is improved with 2 -traffic lanes with curb, gutter and sidewalk.
8. Existing Right -of -Way
Pine Street currently has 50 -feet of right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline).
Commercial Avenue currently has 60 -feet of right-of-way (30 -feet from centerline).
9. Existing Access to the Site
The site currently takes access from a driveway that intersects Pine Street approximately 20 -feet east
of the west property line.
2
10. Site History
The District has not previously reviewed an application for this site.
11. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program
There are no projects within this area that are scheduled in the District's Five Year Work Program or
Capital Improvements Plan.
B. Findings for Consideration
Right -of -Way and Sidewalk
District policy requires 70 -feet of right-of-way on collector roadways (Figure 72-F18). This right-of-
way width allows for the construction of a 3 -lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5 -foot wide detached
sidewalks and bike lanes.
The adjoining road is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five -Year
Work Program or in the currently adopted 20 -year Capital Improvements Plan. As such, the
applicant cannot receive reimbursement for dedicated right-of-way from available collected impact
fees. The applicant shall do one of the following:
a. Dedicate by donation a total of 35 -feet of right-of-way (from the centerline) along Pine Avenue, and
construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Pine Avenue, located a minimum of 28 feet
from the centerline of the right-of-way.
b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Pine Avenue, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an
easement provided to the District.
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Pine Avenue, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary
adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities.
2. Driveways
District policy 72-F5, requires driveways (and private roads) located on collector or arterial roadways
with a speed limit of 30 to align or offset a minimum of 125 -feet from any existing or proposed
driveway.
District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles
to a maximum width of 35 -feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb -cut type
facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15 -foot radii will be required for
driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways.
Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked
onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to
pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the
roadway and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway that intersects Pine Avenue approximately 150 -
feet east of the west property line and aligns with Stonehenge Way. This driveway location meets
District policy and should be approved with this application.
3
The driveway is proposed to intersect Pine Avenue and extend to the south and eventually intersect
Commercial Avenue. The District does not encourage connections between two public roads and
recommends that the route be as circuitous as possible.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 30 -foot wide driveway that intersects Commercial Avenue
approximately 140 -feet east of the west property line. This driveway meets District policy and is
approved with this application.
Stub Streets
District policy 7203.5.1 and 7205.5 requires stub streets to provide intra -neighborhood circulation and
to provide access to adjoining parcels. District policy also requires temporary turnarounds with a
temporary easement provided to the District at the end of stub streets that serve more than one lot, or
are greater than 150 -feet in length with a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, 'THIS
ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE".
The applicant is proposing to extend Commercial Avenue from the east property line and extend it to
the west property line. Staff is supportive of the extension of Commercial Avenue. Due to the fact
that Commercial Avenue is greater than one lot in depth and greater than 150 -feet, that applicant
should construct a temporary turnaround easement at the terminus of Commercial Avenue or on
Stonehenge Way (the private road). The applicant should also install a sign at the terminus of
Commercial Avenue stating that, 'THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE".
4. Street Sections
District policy 7204.4.2 states, "developments with any buildable lot that is less that 1.5 -acres in size
will typically provide streets having a minimum pavement width of 32 -feet with curb, gutter and
sidewalks. The total street width shall be 36 -feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Variations of this
width may be allowed, depending on traffic volumes forecast to be generated by the development.
Concrete sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5 -feet in width unless they are separated from the curb 5 -
feet or more in which case the sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4 -feet in width.
The applicant is proposing to construct Commercial Avenue as a 36 -foot street section with curb,
gutter and sidewalk within 50 -feet of right-of-way. Commercial Avenue is currently constructed as a
40 -foot street section within 60 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant should taper Commercial Avenue
from the existing 40 -foot street section to the proposed 36 -foot street section.
5. Other Access
Pine Street is a classified roadway. Other than the access point that has specifically bee approved
with this application, direct lot access to Pine Avenue is prohibited. Notes of this shall be noted on
the plat.
C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall do one of the following:
a. Dedicate by donation a total of 35 -feet of right-of-way (from the centerline) along Pine Avenue, and
construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk along Pine Avenue, located a minimum of 28 feet
from the centerline of the right-of-way.
Il
b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Pine Avenue, located a minimum of 28 -feet from the centerline of the right-of-way, in an
easement provided to the District.
c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Pine Avenue, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary
adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities.
2. Construct a (30 -foot wide maximum) driveway that intersects Pine Avenue approximately 150 -feet
east of the west property line and aligns with Stonehenge Way, as proposed.
3. Construct a 30 -foot wide driveway that intersects Commercial Avenue approximately 140 -feet east of
the west property line, as proposed.
4. Pave the driveways their full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of
the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
5. Extend Commercial Avenue from the east property line and extend it to the west property line.
Construct a temporary turnaround easement at the terminus of Commercial Avenue or within the
private road. Install a sign at the terminus of Commercial Avenue stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE
EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE".
6. Construct Commercial Avenue as a 36 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 50 -
feet of right-of-way. Taper Commercial Avenue from the existing 40 -foot street section to the
proposed 36 -foot street section.
Other than the access point that has specifically bee approved with this application, direct lot access
to Pine Avenue is prohibited. Notes of this shall be noted on the plat.
8. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
D. Standard Conditions of Approval
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with
Ordinance #197, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in
the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other
regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises
the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the
time the change in use is sought.
E. Conclusions of Law
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are
satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines
M
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff
or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request
reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously
requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried
out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties.
a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration,
but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners
present.
If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a
certain time.
b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later
than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following
the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request,
the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled
regular Commission meeting.
c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new
facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has
developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or
law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting.
d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it
occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD
staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter
is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting
where the agenda notice so provides.
e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action,
interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the
President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take
any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable.
f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover
administrative costs, as established by the Commission.
7
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE December 18, 2003 ITEM #
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
M
CUP 03-057
Ll
r Commons Subdivision
NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL
VlNv1�
v
�l
BASALITE
CONCRETE PRODUCTS
-POISE. IDAHO
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
C/o City Clerk
Meridian City Hall
33 East Idaho
Meridian, ID 83642
Atm: Commissioners,
I13 2 II
iai�i .� � -
NOVEMBER 18, 2003
I am writing to comment on the proposed "Mayfair Commons Subdivision"
which is again coming before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission for
consideration. Several months ago I appeared in person to comment, and presented our
concerns as a business operating in the industrial zone adjacent to this proposed project. i
will be unable to attend this November 20ffi hearing because I will be out of town on
business. Please accept these comments on behalf of Basalite Concrete Products, a block
and brick manufacturing company located at 1300 E. Franklin Road, Meridian, Idaho.
Since the original proposal was presented several months ago (at which time the
re -zoning request was denied) I was called upon by the developer of this proposed
"Mayfair Commons" project. This meeting took place approximately two months ago.
In that meeting the developer proposed a revision to the original plan which included
some commercial sites on the southern end of the property (directly adjacent to our
property) and residential buildings on the northern end. I commented at that time that
this would be an improvement from our perspective, but that I still had reservations about
mixing residential development so close to industrial sites.
I still have strong reservations about this project going forward. Complaints from
residents in the apartments could lead to future restrictions on our -business -and thei - --
businesses on operating hours. These types of restrictions have been placed on other
block manufacturing plants in other states even though the manufacturing plants existed
long before residential development occurred. Having the flexibility to operate 24/7 if
needed is crucial to the competitiveness of this business.
Furthermore, some children living in close proximity to industrial areas do not
respect "No Trespassing" signs and will find ways to entered restricted areas to play on
1300 E. FRANKLIN ROAD • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4050
material and equipment or commit vandalism. This creates a real cost to area businesses
and, more importantly, a significant danger to the children.
Mixing commercial/industrial zoning designations with residential zoning is not
good policy for existing and future businesses, nor is it good policy for the residents who
may move into these areas without really understanding the potential for noise and the
attractiveness of industrial sites for children to explore. Truck traffic can also pose a
significant danger to children who are playing in areas around their apartments that are
near industrial sites.
For these reasons I want to go on record as opposed to this development. Thank
you for considering these comments.
Best regards,
Mark Smith
General Manager
18 2003
..trio/Va ''Lf= "9 ;ii kAI YOB 887 1707
PrecisionCraft
Loc
Robles
711 East Broadway - Meridian, ldabo 83642
208 887-1020 (ph) 208 887.1253 (rax)
.iYoung(aO)precisioncrafr,00ni
ME:
DATE: November 18, 2003
TO: Meridian Planning and Z
FROM: Jim B. Young, President
SUBJECT: Wildwood Development,
Dear Commissioners,
Precision Craft Manufacturing facility is
Mayfair Commons Subdivision. We are
from industrial to residential.
We respectfully request the Commission
reasons to separate residential from indus
used its good,f udgment to previously den,
be taken for this application,
;c
comely :fix;
.`,
B. Young, President
k
I'a ,Yid:
unri. 4 City Clerk 10001
Craft
laooi
RECEIVED
u
NOV 3 w 2003
M
City OfMeridia:
..,s City Clerk Office
F+Z Nth.
)RAND
b T��1 •ZC:-0�
�vM
I j��ms 7 l � 12,13
fed aftlie end of Broadway near the proposed
)sed to' proposed rezoning of the subdivision
this application, All of the 102ical and valid
are applicable'in this case. The Commission has
oning 11 of the property, We urge the same action
9RRRRRF,RSa on= a,
RECEIVED
NOV 18 2003
18 November 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission:
This letter is in reference to Mayfair Commons Subdivison. My residence is directly East of this
proposed subdivision.
I am very much opposed to having multi -family or single family residences at this location. If this
rezoning is approved it would greatly effect the value of my property. When we bought our place ten
years ago that property was zoned I -L. That was one of the reasons we bought where we did. We
assumed we would not have to worry about residences. We have a very nice home and lot. It is very
quiet and peaceful. I would like it to stay that way.
At this time East Pine has all the traffic it can handle. We do not need anymore!!
The address that Wild Wood Development is using for this property is incorrect , 1125 E. Pine is MY
address! !!
I would appreciate it if the commission would consider my views.
Richard H. Collins
1125 E. Pine
Meridian, Idaho
887-0083
RECEIVED
NOV 18 2003
City Of Meridiaci
City CIerk Office
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
RECEIVET)
JtlLi1 A^ 1 a 2003
C'TY OF MER1D14N
CITY (:j FORK 0rF7j(-
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
7q 7
Atnd0y\ 70 s36ya
887-183y
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
RECEIVED
.; � 203
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CL.FRK OFFIC;F
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
IS1e/2.i W &C-(_
A,t&fr� LLL
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
DECEIVE
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY C1 FRK nFFrF
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would `
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
V` fur i6'K -S
�1 � � . Y1.wl S I-w.-� S�•
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
RECEIVED
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLFRK nFF1r,F
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
C� 641w�
/ile'w SPigce-0 Ce.,� s� . -zn r
7t/ 11l f2�Lst�K
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
RECEIVED
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY Ct_ FRK nF:F1r'F
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank on --
Z��'-pyc�-�3�1
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Atm: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
RECEIVE_.)
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY {;iFRK (')FFIt'F
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ren at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
�(t)G - n� �tnFce Cam pltx �s���sS GNnevs ALSV\.
201- 7Hy /\/, R -0 -e -i' .
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
ECEIVE
x
CITY OF 1'JEROAN
CITY c;; ppK
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
rvc hrl— �A
AIAW- A� � n47}d
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
7q6�-
R39 -gooy
E
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Attn: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
QTy'pi3
Cl i 'y' {;i IDJAN
PRK r)F 1( F
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied. n I
Thank you,
S
( o 57-&
19 November 2003
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
City of Meridian
Meridian City Hall
33 E. Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Atm: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
E C
CITY 0
C17�PK��F�Ir
This letter is in opposition to the proposed development of the Mayfair Commons Subdivision by
Wildwood Development, LLC. The proposed change from Industrial to High Density Residential would
create conflicts between the existing Industrial properties and the proposed improvements and occupants.
The current occupants and owners of the Industrial property do business on a 24/7 work schedule with
equipment being ran at all hours of the day and night. The current noise levels are not excessive for
Industrial property, however will cause problems when combined with residential. The change in original
application and proposal are going in the right direction having the South portion being proposed Industrial
as currently Zoned. As stated at the original meeting dated 9 September 2003, there are countless reasons
that this Industrial Zone remains Industrial. I feel that the original decision by this Commission on 9
September 2003, regarding this property being improved with Residential is upheld, and the rezone to
residential be denied.
Thank you,
�grvyTJJl
715 ,v_ V2Elsdt� .s`f�
8'66 -aid 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
DATE November 20, 2003 ITEM #
PROJECT NUMBER
CUP 03-057
RECEIVED
Nov 2 0 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
13
PROJECT NAME Mayfair Commons Subdivision
NAME (PLEASE PRIN
FOR IAGAINSTINEUTRAL
November 17, 2003
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING November 20, 2003
APPLICANT Wildwood Development, LLC ITEM NO.
CUP 03-057
13
REQUEST Public Hearing — Request for a Conditional Use Permit for multi -family residential
subdivision requesting reduced setbacks, parking standards, & dimensional requirements in a
proposed R-15 zone for proposed Mayfair Commons Subdivision — 1125 East Pine Street
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted:
Emailed:
COMMENTS
gee a1AaCIned &VQJPP C43Mrr+cr%:V
See attached Comments
No Comment
No Comment
No Comment
See attached Comments
See attached Comments
V-e-VIOU-ce
J�y Q1 1&165
0Date: ti t ? P one: S31,p,G-355 LK
Staff Initials:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of Me City of Meridian.
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
MAYOR A Good Place to Live
Robert D. Come CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd 33 EAST IDAHO
Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Cherie McCandless (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887.4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
William L. M. Nary
STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Wendy Kirkpatrick, AICP, Associate City Plann iN
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech
Re: Mayfair Commons
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 Pax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 FAX 888-6854
Zoning of 9.34 Acres from I -L to R-15 (High Density Residential), by
Wildwood Development, LLC (File No. RZ-03-011)
• Preliminary Plat Approval of 38 Building Lots and 17 Other Lots on 12.74
Acres in proposed R-15 (PD) zone by Wildwood Development, LLC (File No.
PP -03-031)
• A Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development on 9.34 Acres to Allow
Reduced Setbacks, Parking Standards, and Dimensional Requirements by
Wildwood Development, LLC (File No. CUP -03-057)
We have reviewed the aforementioned applications and now offer the following comments,
as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
The Applicant, Wildwood Development, has requested the zoning of 9.34 acres of land located
at 1125 East Pine Street. The land is presently zoned I -L (Light Industrial). The Applicant has
requested that 9.34 acres of the subject property be zoned to R-15; the remainder of the property
will remain zoned I -L.
The applicant has previously submitted an application for this project. The original Mayfair
application was withdrawn by the applicant prior to the scheduled Planning and Zoning hearing.
The original application was a rezone of 12.74 acres to R-15, featured a different road
configuration, and did not include any light industrial lots.
The applicant's preliminary plat request is for 35 multi -family residential building lots, 3 light
industrial lots and 14 other lots, including 10 garage/ storage lots and 4 common lots. The multi-
family lots include 15 attached and detached 4-plex buildings. The "other" lots include ten
RZ03-011, PP -03-031, CUP -03-057 Mayfair Coamona. A& PP.CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 2
garage and storage lots and four common lots, including three open space lots consisting of 2.86
acres and one drive aisle/ parking lot. The proposed gross density is 15 d.u./acre. The plat
includes 2.86 acres of open space, or 30% of the gross land area.
The Applicant has also requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned
Development (PD) on the multi -family residential portion of the project only. The proposed
industrial lots are not part of the PD application. The purpose of the PD application is to allow
alternative development standards, including reduced residential building setbacks, reduced lot
frontages, and a deviation from parking standards. Following is a comparison of the City's
minimum R-15 requirements and the reduced requirements that have been proposed by the
Applicant through the PD application
Setbacks- City Requirements (R-15)
Front: 20'
Rear: 15'
Side: 57per story
Street side: 20'
Comer Lots: 20'
Lot Size- City Requirements
R-15 zone: 2,400 sq.ft.
Lot Frontage -City Requirements
50'minimum
Parking- City Requirements
2 spaces per unit
LOCATION
Proposed Setbacks
Front: (Multiplex) Front Stairs: 9'
Front Building: 14'
(Garage/ Storage) 0'
Rear: 15' for Multiplex
Garage / Storage: 0'
Side: 7.55' (Multiplex)
Side: 0' (Storage)
Street side: 10'
Comer Lots: 10'
Proposed Lot Sizes
2,400 sq. ft.
Proposed Frontage
0'
Proposed Parking
1.5 spaces per unit
The property is located at the 1125 E. Pine Avenue
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Pine Street borders the subject property directly to the north. Danbury Subdivision, a
single-family residential subdivision, is located north of Pine Street and is zoned R4.
South: Union Pacific Railroad tracks border the subject property directly to the south, property
south of the railroad tracks is zoned I -L.
East: Santee Business Park is located directly east of the subject property and is zoned I -L.
RL03-011, PP-03031,CUP-03-057 MeyOv CwnmonaA PP.CWPD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 3
West: Single-family residential zoned RI (Ada County.)
ZONING ANALYSIS
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both
the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances
of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate
evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment."
The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff:
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Staff finds that the requested zoning designation of R-15 is harmonious with and
in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and Generalized Land Use
Map, which designates the land to be "Mixed Use Community."
B. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
The area has been designated as a Mixed Use Community area in Meridian's
Comprehensive Plan. These Comprehensive Plan designations in combination
with the L -O and R-15 zoning directly east and south of the subject property make
the proposed zoning of the property compatible with surrounding land uses and
the City of Meridian's plan for the development of the area.
C. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed uses are compatible with the existing and intended
character of the area. The Comprehensive plan designates the area as Mixed Use
Community; the proposed mixture of high-density residential uses is compatible
with the Comprehensive Plan designation. Staff finds that the proposed uses can
be designed and constructed in a manner that will be harmonious with and
appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the
surrounding area.
RZ-03-011, PF 43431, CUP -03-057 Mey&U Couwms. AZ. PP.CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 4
D. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony to determine
whether or not the proposed use will be disturbing or hazardous to the
neighboring uses.
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed uses will be hazardous or disturbing to
future or existing neighbors.
E. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the subject property can be served adequately by all essential
public facilities and services.
F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds that there will not be additional requirements at public cost and that the
zoning will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare.
G. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff finds that the proposed uses will create additional traffic, especially on Pine
Street. The southwest comer of the proposed development is located in the
floodway. No construction will be allowed in the Five Mile floodway. The
remainder of the subject property is located in the floodplain and will be subject
to all applicable regulations found in Section 10-6-5 of the MCC.
H. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets; ,r
Staff finds that the proposed vehicular approach on Commercial Avenue and the
proposed vehicular approach on Pine Street have the potential to interfere with
traffic on the surrounding streets.
&Z03-0 II, PP 43,031, CUP -03-07 Wyf*Comae. AZ PP.CUPlPD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 5
Ada County Highway District's comments should be considered when making
this finding.
L Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
Staff finds no natural or scenic features of major importance will be lost or
damaged by approval of rezone request. A portion of the subject property is
located within the Five -Mile Floodway and the remainder of the property is
located within the 100 -year Floodplain (zone AE; known flood elevations).
J. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592,11-17-1992)"
Staff finds that the proposed of this property would be in the best interest of the
City by increasing the variety of housing types available in Meridian.
ZONING COMMENTS
1. The legal description submitted with the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission
2. The requested zoning designation of R-15 is compatible with the City Comprehensive Plan
and Meridian's Zoning Ordinance.
3. A Development Agreement will be required as part of this rezone request.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed
subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the
following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan;
As noted above, staff finds that the subdivision conforms to the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan addressing parks and housing. See Zoning Analysis Comment C
above.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the propo§ed development;
fl
Staff finds that public services are, available to accommodate the proposed subdivision.
The developer will extend existing water and sewer mains to the subject property.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
RZ03-011, PP -0-031, CUP -03-05/ Mayfa rC�. AZ PP.CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 6
Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds; the developer will extend urban services to the subject property.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing
supporting services; the developer will extend urban services to the subject property.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
Staff finds that a portion of the subject property is located in the floodway and the
remainder of the subject property is located in the 100 -year floodplain and will be subject
to all flood hazard reduction standards found in section 10-6-5 of the Meridian City
Code. Approximately half of lot one, block 2 is located in the floodway and will be
undevelopable. Additionally, Section 10-6-6 of the MCC restricts the storage of
hazardous materials in the floodplain.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
N. Stonehenge Way: The applicant is proposing to connect two public streets (E. Pine Avenue
and E. Commerce Avenue) with a parking lot drive aisle (N. Stonehenge Way.) Staff has
serious concerns regarding the safety of the proposed parking lot drive aisle. The location of
the proposed parking lot drive aisle between Pine Avenue and Commerce Avenue will bring
cut -through traffic into the proposed housing development. Staff has concerns over the
potential for cut -through traffic on the Private Road and the danger this traffic would present
to residents of the planned development. The applicant has submitted a new configuration
for the road connecting E. Pine Ave. and E. Commercial Ave. The new configuration
features a curve in the road. The previously submitted road configuration which was
opposed by staff featured a straight road which directly linked E. Pine Ave and E.
Commercial Ave. Staff is in favor of the new configuration which has been submitted by the
applicant. The configuration of the parking lot drive aisle and planned development features
parking stalls immediately adjacent to the proposed parking lot drive aisle. This
configuration will result in cars backing out of their parking stalls into the parking lot drive
aisle, a potentially dangerous situation.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (preliminary plat)
Sanitary sewer service to this site will be from an extension from the existing main in E.
Pine Avenue. The applicant will be responsible to construct lateral sewer mains to and
through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and
routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer mains will not be allowed within
landscape areas, beneath landscape islands, and manholes will not be allowed in parking
and loading areas. This development shall be subject to latecomers' fees to reimburse
xz03o11,PP-03-031.CLWAM57 MofirC�.A PP.CJPlPU
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 7
those responsible for bringing sewer service to the area. Payment of the latecomer's fee
shall be required prior to signature on the final plat map.
2. Water service to this site will be from an extension of existing water mains in E. Pine
Avenue and E. Commercial Avenue. The applicant will be responsible to construct water
mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate
main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department.
3. The developer shall be required to install all trees within each phase of the development prior to
any Certificates of Occupancy being issued.
4. Fencing details shall be submitted with the Final Plat application. Fencing adjacent to
pathways or the common area lots shall not be over four feet in height if constructed of a
solid material, and shall not be more than four feet in height if it is non -sight obscuring.
A solid, 6 -foot high perimeter fence shall be installed prior to any building permits being
issued, unless agreed to otherwise in writing by the Planning Director.
5. All parking lot striping must be completed prior to occupancy.
6. All landscaping must be consistent with the approved landscaping plan.
7. All required amenities must be installed prior to occupancy.
8. Each storm drainage lot may have only one rock sump. The maximum dimension of the
rock sump may be only 5'.
9. All landscaping must be maintained in accordance with ordinance 12-13-17.
10. All parking stalls and drive aisles must meet parking standards as outlined in Section 11-
13 of the Meridian City Code.
11. All access roads and micropaths on the subject property must be constructed of dust -free
materials. These materials may include: washed gravel, recycled asphalt, asphalt or
concrete.
12. Sod will be required for all areas indicated as lawn on the landscaping plan.
13. Landscaping will require a separate bond from other items bonded for by the applicant.
14. Slopes in drainage areas shall not be greater than 3 to 1.
15. All trash enclosures must be shown on the site plan.
16. The required landscaping and irrigation system shall be installed prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for any building on any lot created by the subdivision.
Landscaping and fencing must be bonded for prior to applying for building permits.
$203.011. PP -03031. CUP -03057 Mqf i, Cavvwne. M. PP.CMPD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 8
17. No phasing lines were shown on the preliminary plat. If phasing is planned, applicant
shall submit a revised plat prior at least 10 days prior to the next public hearing showing
the proposed phase lines.
18. The phasing schedule shall apply to the residential portions of the subdivision only. If the
applicant/developer determines that the officelcommercial property can or should be
developed in an order that is not consistent with the phasing schedule, they may request
final plat approval of said phases in a non -sequential manner without revising the
preliminary plat. All development, however, must be contiguous to a previously approved
phase.
19. Underground pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. The
applicant has indicated that the pressurized irrigation system within this development is
to be owned and maintained by the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District.
20. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-
round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection
to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the
developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior
to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer.
21. The initial soils/groundwater investigation report dated May 14, 2003, submitted with the
application indicates that groundwater levels are very shallow. Please submit all updated
groundwater/soils monitoring data to the Public Works Department. All drainage areas
(detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is retained only during
100 -year storm events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within
drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. The project engineer should pay close attention to the
results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics
during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that
the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established
normal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl
spaces of homes is at least 1 -foot above groundwater
GENERAL COMMENTS (Preliminary Plat)
The proposed development is located in the floodplain and a portion of the subject
property is located in the Five Mile floodway. The development must comply with all
provisions for flood hazard reduction as outlined in Section 10-6-5 of the Meridian City
Code.
2. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's'final approval letter
for the subdivision name, and the lot and block numbering. Make any corrections
necessary to conform.
Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
RZ-03411, PP -03031, CUP -03-0T! Meyfert C�. AZ. PP.CUP/M
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 9
4. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing,
pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. A
separate letter of credit or cash surety will be required for landscaping.
5. Two -hundred -fifty and one -hundred -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be
required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be
installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire
hydrants.
6. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per
City Ordinance 12-4-13. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans
will need to be approved by the appropriate inigation/drainage district, or lateral users
association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works
Department.
7. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Sections 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
8. Any drainage areas (detention / retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is
retained only during 100 -year storm events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24
hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1.
Graphically depict any FEMA flood plain boundaries. Note restrictions associated with
the flood zone on the face of the preliminary plat.
10. Performance specifications for the common area pressurized irrigation system shall be
submitted with each Final Plat application.
STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each
proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditional use permit if
they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open
spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by this
ordinance;
Staff finds that the subject property's size of 9.34 acres is large enoujlr to accommodate
the proposed residential development and all other required features if the applicant is
granted deviations from parking requirements through their Planned Development
application. The applicant is providing 2.86 acres of open space and is proposing a
density of 15 dwelling units per acre. The Planned Development standards require that
each unit have 100 sq. ft. of useable private open space or that the applicant provide .....
RZ I1. PP -03-031, CUP -03-057 Mayfair Conmwna. A PP.CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 10
for each dwelling unit or have this requirement waived by Meridian's City Council— this
open space shall be depicted on the site plan and/ or building elevations submitted to City
Council.
The applicant is proposing to provide 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit (MCC requires
2 spaces per unit.) Although parking standards are not noted as a specific item that can be
changed, the purpose statement of the Planned Development ordinance supports this
request by the applicant for a deviation from the parking standards.
B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance;
The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as Mixed Use -
Commercial. The proposed high-density residential development is harmonious with and
in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. The project meets the requirements and
objectives of the Planned Development Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to include
101/o open space and a "sport court" to meet the requirement for two amenities for the
planned development.
C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character
of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential
character of the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed uses will be compatible with other residential and light
industrial uses in the general neighborhood and the existing and intended character of the
general vicinity.
D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,
will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed project will have an adverse impact on the
surrounding property; however, the Commission and Council should consider any
testimony given at the public hearings before making this finding.
E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of
proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any, such services;
Staff finds that the proposed development is considered infill development and can be
adequately served by essential public facilities including: streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer.
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public
AZ03-011, PP-03.031,CUP43-057 Mayfair Co .AZ PP.CMPD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 11
cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic
welfare of the community;
Staff finds that the proposed use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the
community, nor would it create the need for any new facilities or services to be paid for
by the public. The developer will extend urban services to the subject property.
G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment,
and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare or odors;
Staff finds that the proposed configuration of the planned development and its parking lot
drive aisle has the potential to be detrimental to persons, property and the general
welfare by producing excessive traffic crossing through the subdivision between
Commercial Avenue and Pine Avenue
H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be
so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Staff finds that the proposed use will create significant interference with traffic on the
surrounding public streets. The Council and Commission should refer to the ACHD
report for additional information concerning this finding.
I. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed
by issuance of this conditional use. Nearly all the subject property is located within the
Five -Mile Floodplain area.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
The applicant is proposing a deviation from the MCC's parking requirements of 2 spaces per
dwelling unit. The applicant is proposing to provide 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit due to the
number of one bedroom and studio dwelling units that have been proposed for the planned
development. Staff supports this deviation from the parking standards for this planned
development.
• Section 12-6-2 of the MCC requires:
"All residential planned developments shall provide each dwelling unit with at least one
hundred (100) square feet of useable open space, such as a patio or deck. The Commission
and council shall judge each project on its own qualities, and may recommend deviations
RLDMI 1, PP -0M31, CWP04P - b Yfev Commons AZ PP.CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 12
from this open space requirement when it is satisfied that the private and common open space
proposed meets the intent and purpose of the ordinance"
The applicant has proposed a deviation from this requirement of the MCC, Commission and
Council should determine whether the applicant's proposal qualifies for this deviation from
required open space.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Conditional Use Permit)
Applicant shall meet all of the requirements of the preliminary plat as a condition of the
Conditional Use Permit.
2. At least 10 days prior to the next public hearing, the Applicant shall submit a detailed
plan for the proposed park and tot lot.
3. A revised site plan and/or elevations depicting 100 sq. feet of useable open space per
dwelling unit must be submitted at least 10 days prior to City Council.
4. All development shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair
Housing Act.
5. No building permits shall be issued within the development until a Final Plat has been
recorded for the subdivision.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
Chapter VL, Goal III, Objective A, Action 3.:
Provide a variety of park types (neighborhood parks, regional parks) interspersed
throughout the community.
The development's proposed park and "sport court" meet the intent of this Comprehensive Plan
Action
Chapter VH, Goal V, Objective A, Action 4:
Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes and
multi -family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental Awelling units for
all income groups in a variety of location suitable for residential development.
The proposed high-density residential development and its mix of studio, one -bedroom and two-
bedroom apartments meet the intent of this Comprehensive Plan Action. The proposed rental
R943-01 1, PP -03-031, CUP -03-057 Mayfiit Crnmnons. AZ PP.CUP/PD
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
November 20, 2003
Page 13
residential development will help to diversify the types of housing available in Meridian by
providing additional housing choices.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, rezone, and planned
development applications with conditions of approval.
R2,03-01 1, FP -03-031, CUFP0-057 Mgh�Co .. AZ. PP.CUP/PD
MAYOR
ROBERT' D. CoRR1E
UHIEF
KEN W. BOWERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
DEPUTY CHIEF- FIRE PREVENTION
WILLIAM L.M. NARY
JOSEPH SILVA
KEITHBIRD
' .r
DEPUTY CHILE
TAMMY DE WEERDtrro
oe"'K
-TRAINING
BILL JOHNSON'
CHERIE MCCANDLESS
RURAL FIRE COMMISSIONERS
tc
5d0 6avt Franklin Road
RICHARD GREENS
Mcridinn, II> S3641-
TERRY LEIGHTON
(208) 888-1234$TENS
ELLIOTT
J '-
1'JN (208) 995-0.390
9111
_ .t�,�
MERIDIAN CITY/RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
November 10, 2003
RECEIVED
NOV 12 2003
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
TO: Mayor, City Council and Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention
SUBJECT: Mayfair Commons RZ 03-011, CUP 03-057, PP 03-031
The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimLun levels of fire
protection for the proposed project:
1. That a fire -flow consistent with Appendix D of the International Fire Code be
provided to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of
350' apart.
2. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required
before combustible construction begins.
3. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian
Water Department.
4. Final approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department
thru the Public Works Department.
5. All radii shall be 28' inside and 48' outside radius for all entrances and internal roads.
6. All fire lanes shall have an unobstructed width of 20'. No Parking will be allowed on
all internal access roads which are less than 20' wide.
The proposed project will have an undetermined transient population. Based on
historical run analysis the Meridian Fire Department will respond to one call for service
for every 24 people in the service area. This will generate an undetermined number of
calls for service at build out. According to a report completed by Fire & Emergency
Services Consulting Group in February of 2000 our requests for service are projected to
reach 2800 in the year 2005 and 3800 by the year 2010, this is up from 2069 responses
in the year 2000.
8. Any driveway over 150' long will require an approved turn -around.
9. Any building with more than 6 units or more than three stories will be required to be fire
sprinklered.
r-
11/11/2003 02:35
' 'MMf v51
MAY
Robert D.
CITY COUNCIL ERS
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
8885052
SANITARY SERVICES
CITY OF J;�I:•'
v
It IDAHO X,
PAGE 07
LEOALDEPARTMENT
(208) 466.9272 - FAX 4664405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888.3579 • Fax 898.5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500• Fax 887.1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884.5533 •Fax 883.6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by:
13, 2003
Transmittal Date: October 1, 2003 Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
File No.: CUP 03-057
Request: Conditional Use Perini for mulki family residential sub requesting reduced setbacks, parking standards
8 dimensional requirements rn a proposed R-15 zone for or000sed Mavrair rnmmnne
By: Wildwood Development,
Location of Property or Project: 1125
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC. FP)
Meridian School District (No FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC. Fp)
Meridian Post Office (Fp/pP ony)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No vAR, vAc, FP)
Ada County Highway District
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No vAR, vAc, FPJ
Ada County Development Services
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Central District Health
Robert Come, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Nampa Meridian Inig. District
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Settlers Irrigation District
Keith Bird, C/C
Idaho Power Co. (FPmp only)
Cherie McCandless, C/C
U.S. West (MIPPonly)
Intermountain Gas (FPiPP ony)
Ater Department
Sewer Department
Bureau of Reclamation (FPiPP only)
Sanitary Service (No vAR. vAc, Fp)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County
Building Department
(Annansuon only)
Ada County Land Records (pFwpony)
Fire Department
Meridian Development Corporation
Police Department
Historical Preservation Commission
city Attorney Your Concise Remarks:
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department _Iff --50,,- cg"&Da,
RECEIVEDcommEm:
wit L,.," x« toMr"&.An,—�
NOV 12 2_�.3
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
33 FAST IDAHO AVMfUE • MMUDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888.421 B • Human Resources Fox (208) 8848723 • Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
NOV 11 '03 14:49
20 October, 2003
RECEIVED
OCT 2 4 2003
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
William Berg
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: OUP03-057; Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Dear Will:
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has two facilities which border the south and west
boundaries of this property. One is the Gruber Lateral and the other is the Five Mile
Drain. Both of these facilities need to have their easements protected for operation and
maintenance purposes. Therefore the District would need to complete a review and
approve any encroachments which appear to be occurring within the District's facilities.
The easement on the Five Mile Drain is one hundred (100) feet, fifty (50) feet from
center on both sides. The Gruber Lateral is thirty (30) feet, fifteen (15) feet from center
on both sides.
Please forward any further detailed information in order for the District to do an analysis
on this project prior to any further comment.
Sincerely,, p
John P. Anderson
Water Superintendent
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
JPA/dbg
C: Board of Directors
Secretary/Treasurer
Asst. Water Superintendent
Rider 3
File
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
Scott Sherrow
W & H Pacific
3130 S. Owyhee Street
Boise, ID 83705
RECEIVED
OCT 2 4 2003
City of Meridian COPY
City Clerk Office
iQa�tr �c %f�iddiac� �% .
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
RE: Land Use Change Application - Mayfair Commons Subdivision
Dear Mr. Sherrow:
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation
District for its review on the above -referenced development. If this development is under a
"rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or
cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or
personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application.
Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned,
operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P.
Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the
pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate
the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation
District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's
office, or John.P. Anderson, at the District's shop.
Sincerely, b
14x4t,r � �00�-� _
Donna N. Moore, Asst. Secretary/Treasurer
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
DNM1smc
cc: File
Water Superintendent
Will Berg, City Clerk, Meridian City
Montague - Saurial, LLC, 5660 N. Star Ridge Way, Star, ID 83609
Wildwood Development, LLC, 523 Rumpel Lane, Meridian, ID 83642
Conger Management Group, 405 S. 8th Street, Suite 290, Boise, ID 83702
enc.
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
g• DISTRICT
gW HEALTH Environmental Health DivisionReturn to:
DEPARTMENT RECEIVED ❑ Boise
OCT 10 2003 ❑ Eagle
Rezone # ❑ Garden City
c
Conditional Use # �
LAP 0 3 —cu' 7 2 CoOff If Oe Meridian
❑ Kuna
Preliminary / Final / Short Plat ❑ ACZ
/l9a�la.r �o-•,•.a,� S L ❑Star
❑ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal.
❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of:
❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics
❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other
❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
48. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
kid -central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well
❑ interim sewage .g:csntral water
❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water
9 The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality:
A s�entral sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water
❑ sewage dry lines a:2awal water
f-1 . Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center
❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store
,,&L4—Please see attached stormwater management recommendatations
❑ 15.
Dater/-/ 4)-3
Reviewed By: cl�
Review Sheet
COHD 9100 Bc
CENTRAL
DISTRICT
20FHEALTH
DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. • BOISE, 093704-0825 • (208) 375-5211 • FAX 327-8500
To prevent and treat disease and disabifiry; to prom ore healthy lifestyles; and to protect and prom ore the health and qualip, of our environment.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that storm water be pre-treated prior to discharge to the
subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The
engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain
current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a
storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface
water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are:
r d.12 m 0303
State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For
Idaho Cities and Counties.
Prepared by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, July
1997.
Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook.
Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, May 2000.
Ada I Boise County Office
707 N. Armstrong_ PI.
Bo6e, 10 83704
Entero. Health: 327-7459
Family Planning: 327-7400
Immunizations: 327-745C
Senior Nutrition: 327-7460
WIC 327-7488
PPAX: 327-8500
Palle]-; Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties
Elmore County Office
520 E. 84`, St. North
Mountain Home, 10 83647
Enviro. health: 587-5225
Family Health: SE74407
WIC'.F97-44C°
FAX'. 587-312!
Valley County Office
7C3 N. t_t 51.
P.C. Box 144E
McCall, i0 8363E
Ph. 634-7194
FAY: 634-2174
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Q�' CITY OF
C/Vl eY1G�1G -n r
U IDAHO
LEGALDEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 - FAX 466-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579 - Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 - Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297
Keith Bird 17 PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: November 13, 2003
Transmittal Date: October 1, 2003 Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
File No.: CUP 03-057
Request: Conditional Use Permit for multi -family residential sub requesting reduced setbacks parking standards
& dimensional requirements in a proposed R-15 zone for proposed Mayfair Commons Subdivision
By: Wildwood Development, LLC
Location of Property or Project: 1125 East Pine Street
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FF)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Come, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bind, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FF/PF'only)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FFiAPo*)
U.S. West (FP/PPonfy)
Intermountain Gas (FFiPPonly)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PF only)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FF)
Ada County (Annexarlon
Ada County Land F3gcaonly) )
Meridian DeveloprrfWM
Historical Preservation
RECEIVED
OCT 0 31003
OCT 0
?Q13
CITI urs' MERIDIAN
WASTEWATER DEPT.
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE - MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 - (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 - Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 - Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
CITY
Tammy de Weerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
CITY OF Lill—
DAHO� .�
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 . FAX 466-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579 - Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 - Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297
PLANNING & ZONING
MR) RFe_ccaa - c-.. ,,.,,. _.,-.
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: Novemb
Transmittal Date: October 1, 2003
File No.: CUP 03-057
Request: Conditional Use Permt for multi -family
& dimensional requirements in a prop
By: Wlldwoorl never.......__. .. ,.
Location of Property or Project:
David Zaremba, P2 (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P2 (No VAR VAC, FP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Come, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
K ith Bird, C/C
herie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
RECEIVED
OCT - 2 2003
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Hearing Date: November 20, 2003
R-15 Zone for
Pine
it Commons Subdivision
Meridian School District (No Fp)
Meridian Post Office (FP/Pp only)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
_Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
__Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (Fp/pp only)
U.S. West (FPADP only)
Intermountain Gas (Fp/Pponly)
Bureau of Reclamation (Fp/PPordy)
.Idaho Transportation Department (No Fp)
Ada County (Annexation only)
Ada County Land Records (FpippoMy)
Meridian Development Corporation
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE • MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 - (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 - Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 - Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813