Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgency Commentst ~~~~~ Date: June 7, 2012 To: EDR, LLC B1, LLC P.O. Box 1610 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Subject: Reserve West Subdivision/MPP-12-007 N. Locust Grove Rd. Rebecca W. Arnold, President Sara M. Baker, ice President John S. Franden, Commissioner Carol A. McKee, Commissioner On June 7, 2012 the Ada County Highway District Staff acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6171. Sincerely, Kristy Heller Planner II Development Services Ada County Highway District CC: Project file City of Meridian, Conger Management Group (Jon Wardle) Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-765u • WWw.acnaiaano.org Development Services Department `~'~~` ~ 3 c~~~.~'~G ~~ ~~~ Project/File: Lead Agency: Site address: Staff Approval: Owner/ Applicant: Representative: Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 This is a preliminary plat application fora 14-lot residential subdivision on 2.8-acres. The site is located at the terminus of Commander Street, east of Locust Grove Road in Meridian, Idaho. City of Meridian N. Locust Grove Rd. June 7, 2012 ERD, LLC B1, LLC P.O. Box 1610 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Conger Mgmnt Group Jonathan Wardle 1627 S. Orchard, Ste. Boise, Idaho 83705 Staff Contact: Kristy Heller Phone: 387-6171 E-mail: kheller(cr~.achdidaho.org Tech Review: -June 4, 2012 (via email) A. Findings of Fact 1. Description of Application: This is a preliminary plat application fora 14-lot residential subdivision on 2.8-acres. The site is currently vacant. 2. n..~.....:..~:.,....f Adi~nnnt Currnnnrlinn Orr~a' VCi.7V1 ~ ~w Direction ~ ~ v~ i-.w uvv..a v..... v.....-.... ... ~~. Land Use Zonin North Central Academ H.S. R-4 South RUT East Reserve Sub R-4 West Arcadia Sub R-8 3. Site History: ACHD staff previously reviewed this site as part of the original submittal for Reserve Sub (MPP-05-006 & MAZ-05-004) in March of 2005. The District acted on two revised preliminary plats for Reserve Sub that excluded the site in October of 2005. ACRD staff review this site as MAZ-09-006 to rezone the property to R-4 in September of 2009. The requirements of this staff report are consistent with those of the prior action. 4. Adjacent Development: The following developments are pending or underway in the vicinity of the site: Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 • Jericho Subdivision, a 68-lot residential subdivision, located northwest of the site off Jericho Road was approved by ACHD staff in February of 2007. • Three Corners Subdivision, a 43-lot mixed subdivision (10 commercial lots & 33 residential lots), located northeast of the site on the corner of Locust Grove Road and Chinden Blvd. was approved by ACHD in November of 2007. 6. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP): There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that are currently in the Five Year Work Plan or the District's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). B. Traffic Findings for Consideration 1. Trip Generation (if TIS not required): This development is estimated to generate 134 additional vehicle trips per day (none existing); 14 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour (none existing), based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, Stn edition. 2. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH) PM Peak Existing Roadway Frontage Functional Classification PM Peak Hour Traffic Count Hour Level Plus ' of Service Pro ect Jericho Road 60-feet Local 14 n/a n/a Commander Street 50-feet Local n/a n/a n/a Better than Better than Locust Grove Road 0-feet Minor Arterial 218 «p" ,.. ,~, ,. "D" * Acceptable level of service for atwo-lane minor ar<eriai ,s u t~a~ vrn J. 2 Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 5. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts. The average daily traffic count for Jericho Road south of Chinden Blvd. was 253 on 9/5/2006. The average daily traffic count for Locust Grove Road south of Chinden Blvd. was 5634 on 6/22/2011. C. Findings for Consideration 1. Commander Street a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing public roadways within this site. There is an existing stub street at the east property line (Commander Street). b. Policy: Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Street Section and Right-of--Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than 50-feet wide and that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval. Standard Urban Local Street-36-foot to 33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy: District Policy 7207.5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be within 50-feet of right-of-way. The District will also consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval. Most often this width is a 33-foot street section (back-of-curb to back- of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development shall be extended in that development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following: • Reduces vehicle miles traveled. • Increases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. Increases access for emergency services. Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system. Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries. • Promotes appropriate intra-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks, neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc. • Promotes orderly development. Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks. The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least 8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the 3 Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce the width of the parkway strip. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to continue Commander Street as a 33-foot street section (back of curb to back of curb) with rolled curb, gutter, 8-foot planter strip, and 5- foot wide detached concrete sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way. The applicant's proposal would place .5-feet of the sidewalk within the proposed right-of-way, and 4.5-foot of the sidewalk within private property. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal to construct Commander Street as a 33-foot street section (back of curb to back of curb), with rolled curb, gutter, 8-foot planter strip, and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk meets District Policy, and should be approved as proposed. District Policy 7240.4.3 requires that the applicant provide written fire department approval for any street section narrower than 36-feet. However, the applicant's proposal to place the sidewalk partially within the right-of-way and partially on private property does not meet District sidewalk policy, which requires sidewalks to be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. The applicant should do one of the following: • Dedicate additional right-of-way to total 63-feet in order to encompass the entire sidewalk and provide an additional 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk, OR • Dedicate a minimum of 37-feet of right-of-way to fully encompass the street section and provide an additional 2-feet behind the back of the curb. Provide the District with a permanent right-of-way easement for the detached sidewalk to encompass the entire area between the right-of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. 2. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet. 3. Landscaping Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACRD right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet afl District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans. 4 Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Construct Commander Street as a 33-foot street section (back of curb to back of curb), with rolled curb, gutter, 8-foot planter strips, and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk, as proposed. 2. Provide written fire department approval to the District for any street section narrower than 36- feet. 3. The applicant shall either: a. Dedicate additional right-of-way to total 63-feet in order to encompass the entire sidewalk and provide an additional 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk, or b. Dedicate a minimum of 37-feet of right-of-way to fully encompass the street section and provide an additional 2-feet behind the back of the curb, and provide the District with a permanent right-of-way easement for the detached sidewalk to encompass the entire area between the right-of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. 4. Payment of impacts are due prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. E. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way. 2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACRD right-of- way. 3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.6, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACRD right-of-way or easement areas. 6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACRD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACRD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACRD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy. 5 Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless awaiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. F. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. G. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Utility Coordinating Council 4. Development Process Checklist 5. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines 6 Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 ...- ,„ .,,,,~w ~iw~o a~os saa~ ~ ~~~ ##~ +. ~~ ~~~ ~ r ~ ~~~ i`i<~~~~~~~~~ o~ o '~ ~~ ~~ ~~ y a~ ~ ~ ~~~ h~ w qJJl~~• -Oq/~I` al'lhL1~ I ~ Z / [iY ii ly I¢ J ~a au~xoaworre~u ~~~~ ~ ~~ tl ~. ~ z~• ~ y. i 4 Y ~~ tl f ~ 4~~ ~ i ~~ f I >r- ~'•.\ :: - 6• e; ~ • 1' 1 ~'@' ~ ®~ - , ~.: '__..: / ~ w t } , '~ ~ ©= J ~ 0 ! ` ~. -~/~- I ' N -I i - ii :~ `'' t ~fi .. ,E f r :~•',• ~ , q~ ,', .y.l>f- N PSI 7 /, .~• ,i ~, v ~ ~~~~~i rrr (~~~~! I~tii~l~[t { i ~iiEi i~1! a i•~l~I~~N(i~t l i l i l I~It[l[!I!!i!! f l l l i Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 Ada County Utility Coordinating Council Developer/Local Improvement District Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process. 1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities. 2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference. 3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon. 4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise agreed upon. Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com for a-mail notification information. 8 Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 Development Process Checklist Items Completed to Date: ®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACRD ®The ACRD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following: ^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at this time. ®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. I~rr~s to be comolabd by Aonlic~rrt• ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter: The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACRD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.) The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of- way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Non-Subdivisions) ^ Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACHD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up aPre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plan, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACRD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACRD Stormwater Section. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling aPre-Con. 9 Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 Request for Appeal of Staff Decision 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. 10 Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACRD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting. c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting. d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACRD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable. f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission. 11 Reserve West Sub/MPP-12-007 SETTLERS' IRRIGATION DISTRICT COPY P.O. BOX 7571 BO-SE, IDAHO 83707-1571 PHONE: 344-2471 FAX: 343-1642 May 11, 2012 Jon Wardle Conger Management Group 1627 South C+rchard, Suite 24 Boise, ID 83705 Re: PP-12-007 Reserve West Subdivision Dear Mr. Wardle: After review of the Preliminary Plat of the above-mentioned application, Settlers Irrigation District requests the following: 1. All irrigation drainage facilities along with their easements must be protected and continue to function. 2. A Land Use Change Application must be on file prior to any approvals. 3. A license agreement for the pressure irrigation system MUST be signed and recorded prior to construction of any SID facilities, or within its easements. 4. Any changes to the existing irrigation system such as relocation, water delivery, tiling, and landscaping must be approved by Settlers Irrigation District's Board of Directors. 5. All storm drainage must be retained on-site. 6. A pressure irrigation system must be provided to service all lots within the above- mentioned subdivision from the current surface irrigation water delivery point. The current delivery point is from the Saguaro Canyon pressure irrigation system, which is owned by SID. If you have any questions please call 343-5271. Sincerely, ~~--- Nathan Draper, Manager Settlers Irrigation District Enclosures Cc: City of Meridian (w/o enclosures) a a~~a.~ ~~y ~s 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IQAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 City of Meridian City Clerk's Office 33 E Broadway Avenue Ste 102 Meridian. ID 83642-2619 RE: PP 12-007/Reserve West Dear Jaycee: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above-referenced application as it lies outside of our district boundaries. Please contact Nathan Draper with Settlers Irrigation at 344-2471 or at PO Box 7571, Boise, ID 83707. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. All municipal surface drainage must be retained on-site. If any ,surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. The Developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. Sincerely, !1 Greg G. Curtis W"aier Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District GGC/dbg C: File/Office APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 May 16, 2012 CENTRAL ~~ DISTRICT ~ITHEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Environmental Health Division Conditional Use # Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ~p '"~O ~ ~~serJ~e ~dCT' S Return to: ^ ACZ ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden City ^ Kuna ~lleridian ^ Star ^ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office may require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ~8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: -~e~tral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well '^ interim sewage ~.c,~ntral water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality: .,central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry linescentral water ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store 3. ^ 14. Infiltration beds for storm water disposal are considered shallow injection wells. An application and fee must be submitted to CDHD. Reviewed By: Date:~l~/~ Review Sheet 15726-001EH1111