HomeMy WebLinkAboutNormandy Subdivision AZ-06-064 PP-06-065 VAR-07-001
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW AND
DECISION & ORDER
""U /,nm~ ;jwfJ
o......7VLcni:lz:n'i;\
\ >. II).\HO j
~t"' -'
In the Matter of Annexation and Zoning of 27.05 acres from RUT to R-8 AND Preliminary
Plat Approval for 109 single-family building lots and 7 common lots, on 27.05 acres in the
proposed R-8 zone AND Variance Approval to the block length standard (UDC 11-6C-3F)
within a residential district, for Normandy Subdivision, by RMR Consulting, Inc.
Case No(s). AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, V AR-07-001
For the City Council Hearing Date of: March 13, 2007
(Findings on the March 27, 2007, Council agenda)
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of March 13, 2007,
incorporated by reference)
2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of March 13, 2007,
incorporated by reference)
3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of March
13,2007, incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of March 13,2007, incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. S67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code
codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of
Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002,
Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code S
II-5A.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-00I
(PAGE 1 of4)
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not
impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which
shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon
the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected
party requesting notice.
7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description, Preliminary Plat, and the
Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of March 13,
2007, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the
applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval ofthe application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code S II-5A and
based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby
ordered that:
1. The Applicant's Preliminary Plat, as evidenced by having submitted the Preliminary Plat,
dated November 15,2006, by the City of Meridian, is hereby conditionally approved;
2. The Applicant shall eliminate one building lot from the group of lots, one through
seven, Block 3, and increase the square footage of the adjacent lots for a total
minimum of 8,000 square feet. The maximum number of buildable lots for the
development shall be 109.
3. The site specific and standard conditions of approval are as shown in the attached Staff
Report for the hearing date of March 13, 2007, incorporated by reference.
D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits
1. Notice of Twelve (12) Month Preliminary Plat Duration
Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final
plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the Applicant fails to record a final plat
within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or one (1) year of the
combined preliminary and final plat or short plat. In the event that the development of the
preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and
conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted
within successive intervals of eighteen (18) months, may be considered for final approval
without resubmission for preliminary plat approval. Upon written request and filed by the
applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B- 7 .A, the Director
may authorize a single extension of time to record the final plat not to exceed eighteen
(18) months. Additional time extensions up to eighteen (18) months as determined and
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & v AR-07-001
(PAGE 2 of4)
approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City
Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short
plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above
timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property
shall be required to go through the platting procedure again.
E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, a denial of a plat
or conditional use permit entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such
request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-
eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a
regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial
Review may be filed.
2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of
Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has
an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of
the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of
this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho
Code.
F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of March 13,2007
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
(PAGE 3 of4)
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
(htvvAt.- ,2007.
,
2 7 r::- day of
COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON
VOTED~
VOTED fJ6J:.e-A-
COUNCIL MEMBER DAVID ZAREMBA
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
VOTED$^-
VOTED~
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
MAYOR TAMMYdeWEERD
(TIE BREAKER)
VOTED
...----
May my de Weerd
\\ II II/III/
\\\\ .:: ....l:" 1III
", o( p>"I.:;.~~'II.I
Attest: "" ~--{ .......... ~ 1'.1......
.}. (j _o;'l.POR.., h ~ /~
-dh 2 ~ ~ S
- ~~- ~ -
~P- L t CFJ~'L ~
William G. Berg, Jr., City lerk ~ 7. i:).l6......):? g
::- ~ "t$". D .::-
~"O Us, 15' . ~.;
~/ 'Af ~ ,~
Copy served upon Applicant, The Plann'{Mg/~ene,~blic Works Department and City
/1/11""111\\1\\\\
Attorney.
By: S~~Cl!\ rn S liV\.-~ -+0'\
City Clerk
Dated:
O.:S .---2'i;-o(
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & v AR-07-001
(PAGE 4 of 4)
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13, 2007
STAFF REPORT
Hearing Date: 3/13/2007
cM;rldi~ \
\ ,). IDAHO }
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mayor & City Council
Amanda Hess, Associate City Planner
Normandy Subdivision
. AZ-06-064
Annexation and Zoning of 27.05 acres
(Medium Density Residential) zone
· PP-06-065
Preliminary Plat of *W 109 single-family building lots and 7 common lots on
27.05 acres in a proposed R-8 zone
. V AR-07-001
Variance to the block length standard (UDC 11-6C-3F) within a residential
district
1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The Applicant, RMR Consulting, Inc., has applied for Annexation and Zoning (AZ) of 27.05 acres from
RUT (Ada County) to R-8 (Medium Density Residential) and Preliminary Plat approval of 110 single
family residential lots and 7 common lots for Normandy Subdivision.
The subject property is located on the west side of Locust Grove Road, approximately ~ mile north of
Amity Road in Section 30, Township 3 North, Range I East, B.M., and is currently referenced as
Assessor's Parcel Number 81130417300. The site has not been previously platted. The subject property is
within the City's Area of Impact and Urban Service Planning Area.
The gross density of the proposed development totals 4.06 dwelling units per acre. The application does
not directly comply with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for the site which designates the
area as "Low Density Residential." However, the Comprehensive Plan does allow a step up or down for
residentially designated properties. Per the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map, the Commission
and Council can consider residential densities on a case by case basis without the requirement of a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment. This development would be considered a "step up" in density, from
low to medium. The proposed density is in accord with the proposed R-8 zoning district.
The Commission should note that the Applicant has also applied for a Variance (V AR) to the residential
block lengths standard, UDC 11-6C-3F, within the proposed Normandy Subdivision. Said application will
be before City Council concurrent with the subject applications.
2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
The subject applications (AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-00l) were submitted to the Planning
Department for concurrent review. Staff has provided a detailed analysis and recommended conditions of
approval for the requested Annexation and Zoning, Preliminary Plat, and Variance applications. Staff is
recommending approval of the proposed Normandy Subdivision subject to the conditions listed in
Exhibit B of the Staff Report. The Meridian Planninl! and Zoninl! Commission heard these items on
Februarv 1. 2007. At the public hearine the Commission moved to recommend approval to the City
Council.
Normandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
Page]
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13,2007
a. Summarv of Commission Public Hearine:
i. In Favor: Matthew Schultz (Applicant)
ii. In Opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv. Written Testimonv: None
v. Staff Presenting Application: Amanda Hess
vi. Other Staff Commenting on Application: None
b. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission:
i. Transitioning of lot sizes to Reflection Ridge Subdivision to the south
c. Kev Commission Cbanees to Staff Recommendation:
i. Removed Staffs Condition of Approval 1.2.5 which states. "Eliminate one building lot
from the grOUp of lots. one through seven. Block 3. and increase the square footage of
adiacent lots for a total minimum of 8.000 square feet. Maximum number of buildable
lots shall be 109. "
d. Outstandioe Issue(s) for City Council:
i. Staff still supports the removal of one building lot from the aforementioned grouping. to
provide a better transition to the south.
The Meridian City Council beard tbese items on March 13_ 2007. At the DubUc hearin~ thev moved
to aQDrove the subiect annlications.
a. Summary of City Council Puhlic Hearin~:
i. In Favor: Matthew Schultz (Aoolicant)
ii. In Oooositig~
iii. .Gommrnting: None
iv. Written Testimonv: None
v. Staff Presenting Application: Anna Canning
vi. Other Staff Conlffientina on Application: NQn.e
b. Kev Issues of Discussion bv Council:
i. Transitioning olli sizes to Reflection..Ridge Subdivision to the sQillh
ii. Whether :thkseeoal!e beds 10~ili1hinJhe commo1lllrea will render t~oac~usabk
c. Kev Council Chanpes to Commission Recommendation:
i. Reinstated Staffs Condition of AporQYall.2.5 which states. "ElimiI1f@ oneJrnildinl! lot
~:thk llfOUO of lots. one ..thr.ough seven. Block 3. and.iIlIT~ the sauare foota~
~~1s..lor a total minimum of 8.000 sauare feet. Maximmn nuD:ll2kr of buildahk
krtuhall be l1l2~
3. PROPOSED MOTIONS
Approval
After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers AZ-06-
064, PP-06-065, and VAR-07-001, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of March 13,
2007, with the following modifications to the conditions of approval: (Add any proposed
modifications.)
Denial
After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to deny File Numbers AZ-06-
064, PP~06.065, and V AR-07-001, as presented during the hearing on March 13, 2007, for the
following reasons: (State specific reasons for denial of the annexation and/or preliminary plat, and/or
variance request.)
Nonnandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
Page 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAfF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13, 2007
Continuance
After considering all Staff, Applicant, and Public testimony, I move to continue File Numbers AZ-06-
064, PP-06-065, and V AR-07-001 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the
following reason(s): (State specific reason(s) for a continuance.)
4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
a. Site Address/Location:
4145 S. Locust Grove Road
Meridian, ill 83642
Section 30, T3N, RIE
b. Applicant:
RMR Consulting, Inc.
2127 S. Alaska Way
Meridian, ill 83642
c. Owner:
James Patterson
9362 Wichita Street
Boise, ill 83709
d. Representative: Matt Schultz, RMR Consulting, Inc.
e. Present Zoning: RUT (Ada County)
f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
g. Description of Applicant's Request:
1. Date of Preliminary Plat (See Exhibit A): Dated November 15, 2006
2. Date of Landscape Plan (See Exhibit A): Dated December 12, 2006
h. Applicant's Statement/Justification:
The proposed annexation, zoning, and preliminary plat application carefully considered all
aspects of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, site location, surrounding neighbors, and
the housing market in Meridian to develop a quality residential development. The proposal
complies with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the requested zoning for the
development. Please see Applicant's narrative for more information.
5. PROCESS FACTS
a. The subject application will, in fact, constitute an annexation and/or rezone as determined by City
Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code, Title 11, Chapter 5, a public
hearing is required before the City Council on this matter.
b. The subject application will, in fact, constitute a preliminary plat as detennined by City
Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code, Title 11, Chapter 5, a public
hearing is required before the City Council on this matter.
c. The subject application will, in fact, constitute a variance as detennined by City Ordinance. By
reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code, Title 11, Chapter 5, a public hearing is
required before the City Council on this matter.
Normandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
Page 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13,2007
d. Newspaper notifications published on:
January 15, 2007, & January 29,2007 (Planning & Zoning Commission)
February 19,2007, & March 5,2007 (City Council)
e. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on:
January 5,2007 (Planning & Zoning Commission)
February 16, 2007 (City Council)
f. Applicant posted notice on site by:
January 29,2007 (Planning & Zoning Commission)
March 3, 2007 (City Council)
6. LAND USE
a. Existing Land Use(s): One existing home and agricultural land.
b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: A mix of single family residential and vacant
agricultural land, some of which has recently been proposed for residential development in the
city.
c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
1. North: Chatsworth Subdivision, zoned R-8; Pisa Place Subdivision, zoned R-8
2. East: Rural residential, zoned RUT (Ada County)
3. South: Reflection Ridge Subdivision, zoned R-4; Rural residential, zoned RUT (Ada
County)
4. West: Reflection Ridge Subdivision, zoned R-4
d. History of Previous Actions: N/ A
e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities:
1. Public Works
Location of sewer: This property is proposing sewer to Chatsworth Subdivision to the north.
Location of water: This property is proposing water service to via extension of mains in
Chatsworth Subdivision, Locust Grove Road, and Reflection Ridge Subdivision.
Issues or concerns: The Applicant is proposing sewering to mains that are temporarily
flowing out of shed. The Applicant shall be responsible for the installation of an-off
peak pumping station, if they plan on developing prior to the Black Cat Trunk
connecting to the Glacier Springs Diversion Manhole.
2. Vegetation: Existing trees should be retained, mitigated for, or relocated on site
3. Floodplain: N/ A
4. Canals/Ditches/Irrigation: Ridenbaugh Canal runs along the southern property boundary
5. Hazards: N/A
6. Proposed Zoning: R-8
7. Size of Property: 27.05 acres
f. Subdivision Plat Information:
Normandy Subdivision - AZ.06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
Page 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13,2007
1. Residential Lots: 11 0
2. Non-residential Lots: 0
3. Total Building Lots: 110
4. Common Lots: 7
5. Total Lots: 116
6. Open Lots: 0
7. Residential Area: 27.05 acres
8. Gross Density: ~4.06 units per acre (5.32 net density)
9. Lot Sizes: Lot sizes range from 5,200 square feet to approximately 12,000 square feet. The
average lot size is approximately 6,500 square feet.
g. Landscaping:
1. Width of street buffer(s): Locust Grove Road is classified as an arterial road. The UDC
(Table 11-2A-5) requires a 25-foot wide street buffer adjacent to arterials. The landscape plan
proposes a 25-foot wide buffer along Locust Grove Road.
2. Width ofbuffer(s) between land uses: N/A
3. Percentage of site as open space: 4.2 acres (15.5%)
4. Percentage of site as useable open space: 1.41 acres (5.6%)
5. Other landscaping standards: Landscaping adjacent to micropaths should comply with UDC
11-3B-12. Common / open space lots should include at least one deciduous shade tree per
8,000 square feet (UDC 11-3G-3-E2).
h. Proposed and Required Non-Residential Setbacks: As per the R-8 zone for detached single
family dwellings.
1. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access (private, public, common drive, etc.): The primary
access to the development will be from a proposed public street intersecting Locust Grove Road.
The access, Alencon Street, is located approximately 800 feet south of the Y2 mile section
between Amity and Victory Roads. The secondary accesses to the development will be via
Picasso Avenue, a public stub connection constructed with the Chatsworth Subdivision at the
north property boundary; and via Reflection Ridge Drive, a public stub proposed with the
Reflection Ridge Subdivision to the south. ACIID is supportive of the proposal as long as all
Site Specific and General Requirements are met. (See Exhibit B-7)
7. COMMENTS MEETING
On January 12, 2007, Planning Staff held agency comments meetings. The agencies and departments
present included: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Police Department, Meridian Parks Department,
and the Meridian Public Works Department. Staff has attached all comments and recommended actions as
Conditions of Approval in the attached Exhibit B.
8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
This property is designated "Low Density Residential" on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map.
Low density residential areas are anticipated to contain single family residences at densities up to three
dwelling units per acre. (See Page 95 of the Comprehensive Plan) The proposed Preliminary Plat includes
110 residential building lots on 27.05 acres for a gross density of 4.06 dwelling units/acre. The proposed
density is in accord with the proposed R-8 zoning district. The gross density is not within the low density
Nonnandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
Page 5
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13,2007
range outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. As stated above, the application does not directly comply with
the Comprehensive Plan Map designation. However, the Comprehensive Plan does allow the Conunission
and Council to consider residential densities on a case by case basis without the requirement of a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment. This development would be considered a "step up" in density, from
low to medium. Staff is supportive of a step up in density for this project. The following Comprehensive
Plan policies apply to this application (staff analysis in italics below policies):
. Chapter VII, Goal III, Objective A, Action 1 - Require that development projects have planned
for the provision of all public services.
When the City established its Area of City Impact, it planned to provide City services to the
subject property. The City of Meridian plans to provide municipal services to the lands proposed
to be annexed in the following manner:
. Sanitary sewer and water service will be extended to the project at the developer's
expense.
. The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Meridian Rural Fire District.
Once annexed, the lands will be under the jurisdiction of the Meridian City Fire
Department, who currently shares resource and personnel with the Meridian Rural Fire
Department.
. The subject lands currently lie within the jurisdiction of the Ada County Sheriff's Office.
Once annexed, the lands will be serviced by the Meridian Police Department (MPD).
. The roadways adjacent to the subject lands are currently owned and maintained by the
Ada County Highway District (ACHD). This service will not change.
. The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian School District #2. This service
will not change.
. The subject lands are currently serviced by the Meridian Library District. This service
will not change and the Meridian Library District should suffer no revenue loss as a
result of the subject annexation.
Municipal, fee-supported, services will be provided by the Meridian Building Department, the
Meridian Public Works Department, the Meridian Water Department, the Meridian Wastewater
Department, the Meridian Planning Department, Meridian Utility Billing Services, and Sanitary
Services Company.
. Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action 3 . Consider "Acconunodating Bicycle and Pedestrian
Travel: A Reconunended Approach" from the National Center for Bicycling and Walking in all
land-use decisions.
This publication encourages jurisdictions to establish bikeway and walkway facilities in new
construction and reconstruction projects, in a manner that is safe, accessible and convenient.
Staff believes that the subject applications comply with the policies listed in the literature noted
above.
. Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action 5 - Require pedestrian access connectors in all new
development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a
conununity pathway system.
Staff is supportive of the proposed pedestrian connections to future adjacent subdivisions via
public streets and stub connections, in addition to the proposed internal micropathway system.
. Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective C, Action 1 . Protect existing residential properties from
incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels.
Normandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
Page 6
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13,2007
Stafffinds that the residential developments to the north and south are generally compatible with
the proposed subdivision.
However, Staff believes that Lots 1-7, Block 3, which are proposed along the southwest
boundary, do not appropriately transition with that provided by Reflection Ridge across the
Ridenbaugh Canal. Staff believes that the lot sizes proposed along this boundary should be
increased.
. Require street connections between subdivisions at regular intervals to enhance connectivity and
better traffic flow (Chapter VI, Goal II, Objective A, Action 6)
The subject development utilizes two existing stub connections provided by the adjacent
subdivisions, Chatsworth Subdivision and Reflection Ridge Subdivision.
Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on any verbal or written testimony that may
be provided at the public hearing when determining if the Applicant's zoning and development request
is appropriate for this property.
9. ZONING ORDINANCE
a. Zoning Schedule of Use Control: UDC 11-2A-2 lists single-family dwellings as a Permitted Use
in the R-8 zone.
b. Purpose Statement of Zone: The purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of
housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Connection to the City
of Meridian water and sewer systems is a requirement for all residential districts. Residential
districts are distinguished by the allowable density of dwelling units per acre and corresponding
housing types that can be accommodated within the density range.
10. ANALYSIS
a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation
ANNEXATION ANALYSIS:
Based on the policies and goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan and the general compliance
of the proposed development with the Unified Development Code. (Please see Comprehensive
Plan Analysis above for the Applicant's requested step up in density, from low to medium - R-8
zoning) Staff believes that this is a suitable location for the proposed single-family development.
Please see Exhibit D for detailed analysis of the required facts and findings for annexation.
The annexation legal description submitted with the application (prepared by Michael Marks,
PLS, on October 23, 2006) shows the property as contiguous to the existing corporate boundary
of the City of Meridian.
All future uses on this property should not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fwnes, glare or odors,
and should be constructed in accordance with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of
development.
Special Considerations:
Development Agreement: UDC 11-5B-3D2 and Idaho Code 9 65-6711A provides the City
the authority to require a property owner to enter into a Development Agreement (DA) with
the City that may require some written commitment for all future uses. As there are no
issues regarding annexation of the subject property which necessitate a Development
Agreement, Staff believes that a DA is not needed in this instance. All applicable
Normandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
Page 7
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13, 2007
conditions regarding the development of this property are contained in the preliminary
plat approval.
PRELIMINARY PLAT ANALYSIS:
Based on the policies and goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan and the general compliance
of the proposed development with the Unified Development Code, Staff believes that this is a
suitable location for the proposed single-family subdivision. Please see Exhibit D for detailed
analysis of facts and findings for a preliminary plat.
1. Access: The Applicant has proposed a public street from Locust Grove Road as the primary
access to the subject development. Chatsworth Subdivision and Reflection Ridge
Subdivision, although not fully developed at this time, have supplied CottswoId Villages with
two stub street connections, thus providing Normandy with two additional access points to
the north and south City and ACHD Staff are generally supportive of the proposed public
street access, as proposed.
2. Internal Streets: Internal streets sections are proposed to be at least 36 feet wide with rolled
curbs, gutter, and 5-foot concrete sidewalks. The Applicant should note that "Line A" Street,
the extension of the stub connection provided by Reflection Ridge Subdivision, must be
renamed to "Reflection Ridge Drive," as the final plat for Reflection Ridge has been recorded
and naming for this street already established.
3. Lot Sizes: In order for the project to better comply with the policies outlined in the
Comprehensive Plan, Staff is supportive of eliminating one building lot at the southwest
property line; specifically, within the grouping of Lots 1-7, Block 3. This reduction in the
number of lots would address Staff's concerns over the transitioning of lot sizes from this
development with that across the canal within the Reflection Ridge Subdivision, where the
building lots total 9,600 square feet.
4. Elevations: The Applicant has not provided Staff with sample elevations of the housing
products to be constructed within the Normandy Subdivision. Staff recommends that the
Applicant bring prospective elevations to the Planning & Zoning Commission hearing.
5. Landscaping: The Applicant has supplied 4.2 acres (15.5%) of landscaped open space,
meeting the 5% minimum required by UDC 11-3G-3A-l. Of the 4.2 acres of open space
provided, 1.41 acres (5.6%) is considered useabIe open space. The majority of open space is
provided in the form of central common area on Lot 5, Block 4, with a tot lot and basketball
courts.
Staff is generally supportive of the proposed landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts
Associates, no label, and dated 12/12/2006. The plan shall demonstrate compliance with the
following standards.
Per UDC 11-3A-8, all micropaths shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide with 5 feet of
landscaping on either side of said paths.
All landscaping adjacent to Locust Grove Road should conform to the requirements of UDC
11-3B-7.
All common areas approved as open space shall be vegetated and usable by residents.
Maintenance of all common areas shall be the responsibility of the Normandy Homeowners
Association.
Nonnandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-00l
Page 8
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARlMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13,2007
5. Micropathways: Four micropath cOlUlections are proposed within Normandy. This provides
for better pedestrian accessibility within the development to the centralized common area as
well as the future multi-use pathway on the south side of the Ridenbaugh Canal (being
constructed by the developer of Reflection Ridge). The Police Department has concerns
related to visibility along all micropathways and requests the Applicant provide
sufficient lighting along the micropathway.
All micropaths shall be constructed in accordance with UDC 1l.3A-8. Landscaping adjacent
to all micropaths should comply with UDC 11.3B. Maintenance of all micropathways shall
be the responsibility of the Normandy Homeowner's Association.
6. Pressure Irrigation: The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be
supplied by a year-round source of water. The Applicant should be required to utilize any
existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not
available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-
point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments
for the common areas prior to signature on the fmal plat by the City Engineer. An
underground, pressurized irrigation system should be installed to all landscape areas per the
approved specifications and in accordance with UDC 11-3A-15 and MCC 9-1-28.
7. Fencing: The Applicant is proposing six-foot vinyl fencing along Locust Grove Road,
five-foot vinyl-coated fencing along the Ridenbaugh Canal, and five-foot wrought iron
fencing adjacent to the central common area and all micropathways. There is existing
six-foot vinyl fencing installed at Normandy's north property boundary provided by the
Chatsworth Subdivision, an existing development.
The Applicant should submit a detailed fencing plan with the final plat application for the
subdivision. If permanent fencing is not provided, temporary construction fencing to contain
debris must be installed around the perimeter prior to issuance of a building permit. All
perimeter fencing must be completed prior to issuance of building permits.
Fencing should taper down to a 3 foot maximum within 20 feet of all rights-of-way. Fencing
adjacent to the common areas and the micropathway is also required. Said fencing can be up
to six feet in height, if open vision. If closed vision is used, it calUlot exceed four feet in
height. All fencing shall be installed in accordance with UDC 11-3A -7.
8. Ditches, Laterals, and Canals: As per UDC 11-3A-6, all irrigation ditches, laterals, or
canals, exclusive of natural waterways and waterways being used as amenities, which
intersect, cross or lie within the area being subdivided shall be covered, excepting the
Ridenbaugh Canal.
9. Tree Mitigation: Any existing, on-site tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the
property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of
caliper inches of those removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as
replacement trees for those that are removed. The Applicant should coordinate a mitigation
plan with Elroy Huff at the Meridian Parks Department.
10. Existing Structures: The site currently contains multiple buildings. All existing structures
that are to remain shall comply with the dimensional standards (setbacks, house size, etc.) of
the R-8 zone. Prior to signature of the final plat, all structures that do not meet the
dimensional standards should be removed.
VARIANCE ANALYSIS:
Normandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
Page 9
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13,2007
The Applicant(s), RMR Consulting, Inc., has requested a variance from the UDC 11-6C-3F
standard to allow a few residential block lengths within the proposed Normandy Subdivision to
exceed the maximum 750-foot block length.
The proposed subdivision has two blocks that exceed the 750~foot block length; Block I (900
feet) and Block 2 (875 feet). The location of approved stub streets and the lack of provision of
pedestrian walkways in the surrounding subdivisions do not allow these blocks to be broken up
by street connections or pathways. Therefore, Staff is supportive of the Applicant's variance
request.
To grant a variance, City Council must make the following findings:
. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the
district;
. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; and
. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
Staff finds that the developments surrounding the proposed Normandy Subdivision do not
provide stub connections or pedestrian pathways to allow Blocks 1 and 2 to meet the 750-foot
block length standard in accordance with the UDC.
Staff fmds that requiring a stub-street or a pathway within Blocks I and 2 would not be of any
benefit to the City, and would be unreasonable and unpractical, as they would never connect to
adjacent developments.
Therefore, Staff is reconunending approval of the Variance application. Please see Exhibit D
below for detailed Findings regarding the requested variance.
b. Staff Reconunendation: Based on the above analysis, Staff finds that applications AZ-06-064,
PP-06~065 and V AR 07-001 substantially conform to the Comprehensive Plan policies and UDC
standards. Staff recommends approval of said AZ, PP, and V AR applications subject to the
conditions listed in Exhibit B. The Meridian Plannine and Zonine Commission heard these
items on Februarv 1. 2007. At the public hearine the Commission moved to recommend
approval to the City Council. The Meridian City Council heard these items on March 13.
2007. At the DubHc hearing thev moved to annrove the subject annlications.
11. EXHmITS
A. Drawings
1. Vicinity Map
2. Preliminary Plat (Dated November 15,2006)
3. Landscape Plan (Dated December 12, 2006)
B. Conditions of Approval
1. Planning Department
2. Public Works Department
3. Fire Department
4. Police Department
5. Parks Department
6. Sanitary Service Company
Normandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-001
Page 10
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MARCH 13,2007
7. Ada County Highway District
8. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
9. Central District Health Department
C. Legal Description and Annexation Map
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
Normandy Subdivision - AZ-06-064, PP-06-065, & V AR-07-00l
Page 11
A. Drawings
1. Vicinity Map
Ii
L.,(ii
, "
~v I
-j
'~-
Exhibit A
2. Preliminary Plat (Dated November 15, 2006)
ii 1\1"
" ",II
i
..
4_
i.~,'.i
~ k,;
i"-
;.i,
"i,...._...'\ '
ii ~
; l
i I
I'
:I.
~
Exhibit A
. .d.
,,,~;', ~'
,I .
01 .II!
"II
I/:Jbi _
I "/;':1" '.'
,: . .~ .
" ,
.1"..eII' :' . .,
"." >,
'. I' "i11f:' , " ..
.; "
. ,j., ::,
, . :-1"
\'1"
',:';'
, "
(,', ';
.':* "
j,' ".
. {", '
: l :"; ~.
. y :
I
:' ~. :"'
_I,.
,.". ,~, I
3. Landscape Plan (Dated December 12, 2006)
Exhibit A
za
'<
Q", ......'
" , "WI
, ....
- ...
~.
~I!C
- .'
>"~'
. '"
-t
o
'.:Q
=':
U')
,)-
Q
~
<(,
1":
'~"
o
z:.'
1.3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS-PRELIMINARY PLAT
1.3.1 Sidewalks/walkways shall be installed within the subdivision and on Locust Grove Road pursuant
to UDC 11-3A-17.
1.3.2 All lot lines conunon to a public right-of-way shall reserve a 10' utility easement.
1.3.3 The Applicant shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards shown in UDC ll-3A-ll.
1.3.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water. The applicant should be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for
the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the
culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will
be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the
final plat by the City Engineer. An underground, pressurized irrigation system should be installed
to all landscape areas per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC ll-3A-15 and
MCC 9-1-28.
1.3.5 A detailed landscape plan, in compliance with the landscape and subdivision ordinance, and as
noted in this report, shall be submitted for the subdivision with the final plat application. Where
the Applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan and where Staff has reviewed such
plan, the landscaping shall be consistent with the preliminary plan with modifications as proposed
by Staff.
1.3.6 The Applicant shall submit a fencing plan with the [mal plat application for the subdivision. If
permanent fencing is not provided, temporary construction fencing to contain debris must be
installed around the perimeter prior to issuance of a building permit. All fences shall taper down
to 3 feet maximum within 20 feet of all right-of-way. All fencing should be installed in
accordance with UDC ll-3A-7.
1.3.7 Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing
additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed.
Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to
be mitigated.
1.3.8 Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms within the approved annexation /
preliminary plat does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance.
1.3.9 Preliminary plat approval shall be subject to the expiration provisions set forth in UDC ll-6B-7.
2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2.1 Sanitary sewer service to this development is being proposed VIa extension of mains in
Chatsworth Subdivision. These mains are temporarily flowing out of shed, therefore the
Applicant shall wait to sewer this property until the Black Cat Trunk connects to the Glacier
Springs Diversion Manhole, or be responsible to install an Off-peak Pumping Station. The design
and location of the pumping station shall be coordinated with the Public Works Department. This
condition may be rescinded by the City Engineer if information arises from ongoing modeling
exercises, or other subsequent sources.
2.2 The Applicant shall install sewer mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate
main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of
easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is
three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials
shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard
Specifications.
2.3 Water service to this site is being proposed via extension of mains in Chatsworth Subdivision,
Exhibit B
Reflection Ridge Subdivision, and Locust Grove Road. The Applicant shall be responsible to
install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public
Works.
2.4 The Applicant shall be required to connect to the water main in Reflection Ridge Subdivision.
2.5 Lot 13, Block 5, does not meet the minimum frontage requirements; the Applicant shall
revise the plat so that all lots meet the minimum dimensional standards.
2.6 Any potential reimbursement agreements must comply with all requirements of City Code 9-1-13
and 9-4-19, which includes the preliminary agreement (which includes footage, size, and depth of
reimbursable pipe) being finalized prior to construction plan approval. The detailed agreement
with the reimbursable amount shall be approved by Council prior to plat signature.
2.7 The Applicant shall provide a 20-foot easement for all public water/sewer mains outside of public
right of way (include all water services and hydrants).
2.8 The Applicant has not indicated who will own and operate the pressure irrigation system in this
proposed development. If it is to be maintained as a private system, plans and specifications will
be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the construction plan review. A "draft
copy" of the operations and maintenance manual will be required prior to plan approval with the
"final draft" being required prior to final plat signature on the last phase of this project.
If it is to be owned and maintained by an Irrigation District, then a letter of plan approval shall be
submitted prior to scheduling of a pre-construction meeting.
2.9 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water (UDC 11-3A-6). The Applicant should be required to use any existing surface
water for the primary source. If a surface source is not available, a single-point connection to the
culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will
be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the
final plat by the City Engineer.
2.10 All existing structures not meeting setbacks or meeting the dimensional standards of the UDC
shall be removed prior to signature on the [mal plat by the City Engineer.
2.11 Meridian Public Works specifications do not allow any large landscaping within a five foot radius
of water meters. The Applicant shall make the necessary adjustments to achieve this separation
requirement and comply with all landscape requirements.
2.12 Prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer, any existing domestic wells and/or septic
systems within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-
1-4 and 9-4-8 . Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
2.13 Per UDC 11-3A-6 all irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, that
intersect, cross or lie within the area being developed shall be tiled. Plans will need to be
approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch
owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department prior
to plan approval. If lateral users association approval can not be obtained, alternate plans will be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
2.14 Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be installed and activated, sewer system shall
have passed air-testing and video inspection, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road
base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall
be recorded, prior to applying for building pennits.
2.15 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted
required improvements prior to signature on the final plat. These include but are not limited to,
Exhibit B
fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, and water.
2.16 All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, fencing, micro-paths,
pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining
certificates of occupancy.
2.17 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat.
2.18 It shall be the responsibility of the Applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
2.19 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES Permitting that
may be required by the Enviromnental Protection Agency.
2.20 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
2.21 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. Where mailboxes
are located on or near sidewalk the applicant shall comply with all American with Disabilities Act
requirements for unobstructed sidewalk access.
2.22 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
2.23 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of
3 feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom
elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least I-foot above.
2.24 One-hundred watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights, on 25' pole shall be required on all public
residential streets. Two-hundred and fifty watt high pressure sodium streetlights, on 30' pole shall
be required on subdivision entrances and collector roadways. Design of the streetlights shall be
approved by the Public Works Department. Decorative lights require a streetlight agreement on
file with Public Works prior to activation. All streetlights shall be installed at the subdivider's
expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants, and no further than 400'
distance in between locations. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power
designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain approval
from the Public Works Department, and permit from Building Department prior to commencing
installations.
3. FIRE DEPARTMENT
3.1 One and two family dwellings not exceeding 3600 square feet will require a fITe-flow of 1,000
gallons per minute available for duration of 2 hours to service the entire proj ect. One and two story
family dwellings 3600 square feet and greater will require a fITe flow of 1500 gallons per minute.
Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 500' apart. (International Fire Code Appendix C)
3.2 Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and
water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing.
3.3 Final Approval of the fITe hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department.
a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 Yz" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle.
b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications.
d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits.
e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade.
g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the IFC Section 509.5.
Exhibit B
h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing
buildings within 1,000 feet of the project.
3.4 Any roadway greater than 150 feet in length that is not provided with an outlet shall be required
to have an approved turnaround. Phasing of the project may require a temporary, approved
turnaround on streets greater than 150 feet in length with no outlet.
3.5 All entrance and internal roads, and cul-de-sacs shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48'
outside radius.
3.6 Operational fire hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs and access roads with an all
weather surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site.
3.7 To increase emergency access to the site a minimum of two points of access will be required for any
portion of the project, which serves more than 50 homes.
3.8 The proposed 1l0-10t subdivision with an estimated 2.9 residents per household would have a
total estimated population of 319 residents at build out.
3.9 All portions of the buildings located on Lot 8, Block 3, and Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, must be
within 150' of a paved sunace as measured around the perimeter of the buildings.
3.10 Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the
jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as
measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants
and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped
throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section
903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183).
a. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183
m).
b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed
in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600
feet (183 m).
4. POLICE DEPARTMENT
4.1 Interior fencing adjacent to common areas and micropathways shall allow visibility from the
street and shall not exceed four feet in height is solid fencing is used.
4.2 All micropathways shall have adequate lighting to allow visibility from the street.
4.3 The Police Department requests that, within the common park area, all shrubbery be
restricted to two (2) feet in height or less and all tree canopies to six (6) feet in height or
taller.
5. PARKS DEPARTMENT
5.1 Standard for Mitigation of Trees: The standard established in the City of Meridian Landscape
Ordinance (UDC II-3B-IO) will be followed.
5.2 Standard Plan for Protection of Existing Trees during Construction: The standard established in
the City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance (UDC Il-3B-lO) will be followed.
6. SANITARY SERVICES COMPANY
6.1 SSC has no comments related to this application.
7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
7.1 SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Exhibit B
7.1.1
7.1.2
7.1.3
7.1.4
7.1.5
7.1.6
7.1.7
7.1.8
7.1.9
7.1.10
7.1.11
7.1.12
7.2
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
7.2.4
Exhibit B
Dedicate right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road to total 35 feet abutting the
parcel. The right-of-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed and signed by
the applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the ACHD Commission or prior to
issuance of a building pennit (or other required pennits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30
business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The
District will purchase the right-of-way which is in addition to existing right-of-way from
available Corridor Preservation Funds.
Construct a 5-foot concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 28 feet from the centerline of
roadway (measured from the face of walk to the centerline of the roadway).
Provide a road trust to the District in the amount of $1 ,250 for the future construct on sidewalk on
the existing bridge south ofthe site on Locust Grove Road.
Construct a right-turn lane on the southbound approach on Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the
design and construction ofthe right-turn lane with District Traffic Services Staff.
Construct the internal streets as a standard 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, and 5-foot
attached concrete sidewalk within 50 feet of right-of-way.
Construct one cul-de-sac turnaround with no center landscape island, as proposed. Provide a
minimum turning radius of 45-feet for the cul-de-sac turnaround.
Locate the entry road intersecting Locust Grove Road approximately 850-feet south of the north
property line (measured property line to centerline).
Construct a stub street to the north, Picasso Avenue, located approximately 563-feet east of the
west property line of (measured property line to centerline). This is an extension of a stub street
previously approved as part of Chatsworth Subdivision. Full aligmnent (centerline to centerline)
of the two streets is required.
Construct a stub street to the south, Line A, located approximately 563-feet south of the north
property line (measured property line to approximate centerline). This is an extension of a stub
street previously approved as part of Reflection Ridge Subdivision. Full alignment (centerline to
centerline) of the two streets is required.
Design and construct the full crossing of the Ridenbaugh Canal with the construction of the stub
street to the south. Submit the bridge plans for the crossing of the Ridenbaugh Canal (Line A) for
review and approval prior to the pre-construction meeting and plat approval. The District will
release the road trust funds collected from Reflection Ridge Subdivision to the Applicant.
Coordinate the design of the canal crossing with District Development Review Staff.
Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to
this roadway and shall be noted on the final plat.
Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACHD roadway or
right-of-way.
All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be
borne by the developer.
Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy.
Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing
by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for
details.
All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the
State ofIdaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
The Applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit
(or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
Payment of applicable road impact fees is required prior to building construction in accordance
with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
Applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The
Applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days
prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The Applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic
Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during
any phase of construction.
No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing
and signed by the Applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the Applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subj ect of this
application, shall require the Applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or
other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest
advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subj ect property unless
a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect
at the time the change in use is sought.
8. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
7.2.5
7.2.6
7.2.7
7.2.8
7.2.9
7.2.10
7.2.11
7.2.12
7.2.13
8.1 Coordinate with John Anderson, Water Superintendent for NMID, concerning installation of the
underground, pressurized irrigation system.
8.2 All storm drainage shall be retained on-site. If surface drainage cannot be contained on site,
contact Donna Moore at 466-7861, as a Land Use Change Application must be filed for review
prior recording of the final plat.
8.3 All laterals and wasteways must be protected.
8.4 The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31.3805.
9. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
9.1 After written approvals from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve the proposal for
central sewage and central water.
9.2 The following plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health &
Exhibit B
Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage and central water.
9.3 Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
Exhibit B
c. Legal Description and Annexation Map
MlCRJPnONFOM
~DVSU"'"
OCTOElER 23. 2008
Itl..., ..L OFLANQ .lfrO~~flT~ OFTHI:'. '~..l'.'OFS~ON 30.
. IP 3 HORllf,RANClS'1 !AST'OF THE IlOI$e'MeRlOIAN ADA
. . . .... .. I
. j ,1. IDAHO. BEING MORE PAMTICUl.AALyQ89ORISED AS FOLLOWS:
"_ I." ' . \.- ." ',' . , ' ,,' i' ,,'
C~ATTHENOR'11EASTCORNER ..:8l: % (EAST %
CO'-J':OF'SECTION 30. T.3'N.. Fl1E. a~., ThtSRQLPOINT OF
_<>P1'HI$DE$QlltIPTION; . :
lli.II;S.~ t;~~.p:eEf AlONG 11iE.tAlftJNE OF SAID
.'CU=~30 TO A POiNt: ' TNJ5" . . , "(lffTHliRIDEHBAUGH
.~. ..QN",~~,...,
~;r~ CENT'ERLIt!IE.OF THl:RI~,~.'Mt4AL THE FOLLOWING:
nteNCS,S 59OS3W'W:208.6'1 FEeT TOA POfNl'iQfH.lUIWATURE;
. ._7~ 12 FElT Q!t.A:QUF.M: TO THE RIGIiff.JiNPCURVE HAVING A
". . ,. a:oA~==~~::W&~::~~r:
POINT'''T~ENCY; ..
~N 650t6'56- W 4OS..'E;EETTOA POJNT.aR:OURYATURE;
" '~69 Fe~ O".~:Qt,lRvIS TOTHf~~O.CURVE HAVJNGA
. '.., .100.00~.A_TAANQLEOF1~~~.ATMGENTOF
120J;j:,.. ANDA.OMoAD.:~N56WWW;anJi3FEETTOA
PCilfi:'.TANGENCV.;.
~,JlI'46o~t43" W98t~,,~TOA POINTONTHEMORTH LINE OF
THE:." OF BAlD $EC'f1QN...
. . . .. '. . ..~
L6A~:TffE ceNTSItUNi:OF THE RtpEN8AlJGH,CNW.:
N W43'", e 1'.~' FEET ALONG 8AIU~~ UN! TO THE
..... I OF ~T:HtS . .COMPRJStNG~05
ACAJiI1 mu... . ' '. .
" -
. BY
DEe 1 3 ZOO6
l~
, ME610lAft fJUB!JC
. ,...ORKS PEPT.
Exhibit C
~w J ..
lI:
~ t ~
, .
" .
l t.:
11 :
iq
: It
: I
I i I
'11
I '1
'I
j II
' I
lq
'\",'~'.., .~~ =~Ti
-""... '. ...., ~ Q
'\. X,_! I -<
III",.. \"... l ~:.t ". i
'.,'\! . .. ',1
..~ .,~27~Q5 ACRES ~
'1<.- ";"~~,. ~fr=~
I ".' '''', NE iSlE i ' II)
I -'''. " ,i.,: is
I"\. 9
I >40"". .\"...... "I :
~ "' ~;. I "
, ;., ~"" . ~ :
I '.~ .....~ I ·
'". I
t .. ~ " ,,~~ rI~ ~ ·
I .... .,........ _#~ I
: 1~ ...."....-.. ~....,,., .....'__,..~e~'.'..'.#~; ....h'l
.-, ;/ :11
.~"-~ .."; I
...", . ...... I
'ft .I'H8AUGH CANAL . ------.. III
III
_.. ...."g ill
'. . ". III
__ _ ..... '. .' .... .... . '. .' ....: _ __ __ --:._ ._. - -J I
. --'---- _'_ . ." I
. . .,' ..... . .... I
I
I
t
1
f
i
i
t
_.. '.': .i,.' .YA~
89 '
~ "M" " '
DEe '3 2006
..~
I . SW I SEt
~~
a
. .f .$t.;}t.
4 '\:.
suu:: ....,.
ANNEXATioN EXHIBIT rOO
N'Q$M_r';'QJQDI~S1ON .
t,N nfE Sf: 1'+ ,OF. .' d:rft;n^'" .-&\. 3N ail: .-
, . ..('.' '~"~ .~. T. '''i9':' ~I?'
. ADA COfJNTV. IDAHO
Exhibit C
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
1. Annexation Findings:
Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Conncil shall make a full investigation and
shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or
rezone, the Council shall make the following findings:
a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan;
The Applicant is proposing to zone the subject property R-8 (Medium Density Residential). The
Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment generally complies with the applicable
provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals,
Section 8, of this Staff Report.
b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district,
specifically the purpose statement;
The Council finds that single-family residences are allowed within the requested zoning district
of R-8 as a Principally Permitted Use. The accompanying plat demonstrates the land will be
developed with varying lot sizes and other dimensional requirements which conform to the
proposed zoning designation.
c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and
welfare;
The Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare. Staff and the Commission recommend the City Council rely on any oral
or written testimony that may be provided when determining this finding.
d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by
any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited
to, school districts; and,
The Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact
upon delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site, as
conditioned in the staff report.
e. The annexation is in the best of interest ofthe City (UDC 11-5B-3.E).
The Council finds that all essential services will be provided by the developer to the subj ect
property and will not require unreasonable expenditure of public funds. The Applicant is
proposing to develop the land in general compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and this
is a logical expansion of the City limits. The Council finds that Annexation and Zoning of this
property to R-8 would be in the best interest of the City.
2. Preliminary Plat Findings:
In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the
decision-making body shall make the following findings:
a. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan;
The Council finds that the proposed application is generally compatible with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan. The Council supports the proposed density and proposed plat layout, with
recommended changes, as they generally comply with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan.
Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section 8, of the Staff Report.
b. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate
Exhibit D
the proposed development;
The Council fmds that public services can be made available to accommodate the proposed
development. (See fmding Items 3 and 4 above under Annexation Findings for more details)
c. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's
capital improvement program;
Because the developer is installing sewer, water, and utilities for the development at their own
cost, the Council fmds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital
improvement funds.
d. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development;
Staff and the Commission recommend the Council rely upon comments from the public service
providers (i.e., police, fIre, ACHD, etc.) to determine this fmding. (See Exhibit B, Agency
Comments and Conditions, for more detail)
e. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and
The Council is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the
development of this subdivision. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. Staff and
the Commission recommend the Council reference any public testimony that may be presented to
determine whether or not the proposed subdivision may cause health, safety, or environmental
problems of which Staff and the Commission are unaware.
f. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features.
The Council is unaware of any natural, scenic, or historic features on this site. Therefore, the
Council fmds that the proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of
any natural, scenic or historic feature(s) of major importance. Staff and the Commission
recommend the Council reference any public testimony that may be presented to detennine
whether or not the proposed development may destroy or damage a natural or scenic feature(s) of
major importance of which Staff and the Commission are unaware.
3. Variance Findings:
a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the
district;
The UDC restricts residential block lengths to a maximum of 750-feet. However, the Council
fInds that the developments surrounding the proposed Normandy Subdivision do not provide stub
connections or pedestrian pathways that allow Blocks 1 and 2 to meet the 750-foot block length
standard in accordance with the UDC. The subject variance would not be granted but for the
layout of the surrounding development.
Further, the Council fInds that requiring stub-streets or pathways within Blocks 1 and 2 would not
be of any benefIt to the city or future residents in this area and would be unreasonable and
unpractical, as they would never connect to any future development.
b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site;
As noted above, the Council fInds that strict compliance with the City's Ordinances would not be
of benefIt to the City, the surrounding property owners, or the Applicant. The adjacent
developments have not provided street or pedestrian connections that would accommodate the
aforementioned blocks at less than 750 feet. Based on the nature and location of street and
pedestrian connections within adjacent developments, the Council fInds that strict compliance
Exhibit D
with the requirements ofUDC 11-6C-3F would result in undue hardship to the owner, subdivider,
and / or developer.
c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
The Council finds that the proposed variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare. However, Staff recommends that the Council rely on any oral or written testimony
that may be provided when determining this finding.
Exhibit D