Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Treasure Valley Business Park CUP
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Mayor LEGAL DEPARTMENT ROBERT D. CORRIE A Good Place to Live 2 08) 884-4264 Council Members CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CHARLES ROUNTREE 33 EAST IDAHOBUILDING DEPARTMENT GLENN BENTLEY, MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 RE"E� (208) 887-2211 RON ANDERSON Phone (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-48 PLANNING AND ZONING ft B 0 4 1990 DEPARTMENT KEITH BIRD (208) 884-5533 CITY OF MERIDIAN .PLANNING & ZONING TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 2, 1999 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 4, 1999 HEARING DATE: March 9, 1999 FILE NUMBER: CUP -99-003 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI -BUILDING COMMERCIAL & OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILITY WITH DRIVE-THRU BY: CLARK DEVELOPMENT LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAGLE RD. & FAIRVIEW AVE. _ TAMMY DE WEERD P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MARK NELSON, P/Z BYRON SMITH, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C _CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _GLENN BENTLEY, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT _POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ADA COUNTY (ANNEXATION) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: 0 CLARK DEVELOPMENT June 4, 1999 Shari Stiles Planning & Zoning Administrator City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: CUP-99-003/Treasure Valley Business Center Clark Development - Southwest corner of Eagle Road & Fairview Avenue RIEC'ErVED JUN 0 9 1999 CITY OF MERMI AN PLANNING & ZONING Dear Ms. Stiles, We respectfully withdraw the Conditional Use Permit application (CUP -99-003) for the Treasure Valley Business Center at this time. Sincer ly,_ Bill Clark cc: Larry Sale, ACHD Gemtone, Inc. 479 Main Street, Boise, Idaho 83702. 208/342-2625 • Fax 208/342-2627 9 clarkdev@micron.net MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: _JUNE 8. 1999 APPLICANT: CLARK DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER: 2 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI -BUILDING COMMERCIAL & OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILITY WITH DRIVE-THRU (TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER) AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED MINUTES FROM 5/11199 CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: 'x CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 11, 1999 Page 43 MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. MacCoy: All right, thank you for coming this evening and putting your two bits in. It makes it easier for us believe it or not. It's 9:00 let's take a break right now and reconvene in 15 minutes. (BREAK) MacCoy: The commissioners and they've decided to go the distance tonight so we may be here till along time, we request that you work with us and we can get this thing done fast. Item 3 now, having completed item 15, it's a continued public hearing. ITEM NO. 3: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MULTI -BUILDING, COMMERCIAL OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILITY WITH DRIVE-THRU (TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER) BY CLARK DEVELOPMENT— SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAGLE RD & FAIRVIEW AVE: Stiles: Mr. Chairman, commissioners, we did receive a revised plan, we got that late Friday and was put in the packets and put in your boxes on Monday I believe. I have not had time to review it. I feel like they are perfectly willing to meet all their requirements, however, without having any time to review it, I don't feel comfortable making comment on the adequacy of the existing plan. Apparently we still do not have any utilities shown. Bruce has indicated that he does need to see that. The response was that the utilities are existing, but we don't know where those are, they are all private lines and I think as part of Bruce's review he does want to see that and I'm not sure whether waiting till the building permit application is submitted is adequate. Other than that, without having like I say the actual time to do a review of ordinance requirements, I can't comment that I would recommend this to go forward tonight. MacCoy: Bruce do you have anything? Is the applicant here, after all this? Come forward and state your name. BILL CLARK, 479 MAIN STREET. Clark: Commissioners based on what Shari just told you, I wonder if you might want to wait until she has had a chance and the rest of the staff to review the revised plans put together. Just as a general comment I think that we have complied in these revised plans with the concerns that were brought out in the initial staff report and with respect to the utilities, these utilities are part of those that have already been approved and installed for Treasure Valley Business Center who are simply hooking in to those and so those have already been approved and reviewed and accepted by the highway district and City of Meridian. I guess that's our view of it. It would be something that we would expect to be dealt with at least for the portion to be developed onto our site to hook into Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 11, 1999 Page 44 those utilities and streets would be part of the building permit process. I know that you have a lot of things on your agenda, so I don't want to take a lot of your time. Just in summary, we are talking about a 14 acre project, office, retail facilities. This has been reviewed by the highway district. There is some question as to whether or not the highway district is going to be able to acquire the right of way that they've requested. We have submitted as staff did request of us a revised plan that shows the required or our site plan with the ACHD required right-of-way which is quite extensive as you may be aware, they are on both Fairview and Eagle to accommodate an overpass of Fairview Avenue. MacCoy: That's right. Is that it for you? Commissioners do you have any questions? Borup: I think he just answered one of the main questions that I had. The other would be –sir the revisions that you made, was that mainly to accommodate ACHD's comments and requirements or was it some from city staff that the revisions were made? Clark: City staff requested that we revise the site plans to show the ACHD requirements. Borup: So that is what the revisions consisted of? Clark: Yes. Borup: That was what I was wondering. Shari said she hadn't had a chance to review it and I wondering what had changed from the first one? Apparently just the ACHD requirements. I think that answered my questions. Clark: The effect is to take away about an acre and a half of the site or would be if they do and go ahead and acquire it. What it's result on us is to reduce the amount of buildable area. As far as the overall site plan goes it really doesn't effect anything our two main access points, which we already have as deeded access points remain and would remain under the ACHD requirements. They are not taking those away. It's just a slimming down of the side on both Eagle and Fairview sides and it tapers in—the greatest area taken is as you get closer to the intersection. I have a couple of boards if you would like me to show it on... De Weerd: Mr. Clark, how does that effect the landscape buffer? Will you still have the 35 foot desired buffer? Clark: Yes, there is a... De Weerd: I can't tell on the drawing. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission 'May 11, 1999 Page 45 Clark: The simple answer is yes. It is a gateway area where you are requiring a degree of landscaping. We did submit a landscaping plan separately from this as well as a signage plan requested by staff. De Weerd: So you have submitted those? Clark: Yes. De Weerd: And your landscape islands and the parking, how wide are they? Clark: Is that a trick question? De Weerd: No, it's not. I can't tell. Clark: I could find out for you, but I don't know off hand. Unfortunately our architect couldn't be here tonight, but that is included and dimensioned in the landscape plans we submitted. De Weerd: Well, we didn't get a copy of those. Can you see how wide they are? Barbeiro: This is the southwest corner. (Inaudible) De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I guess if the applicant is okay with giving Shari some time to look at the revised plans, I'm okay with that. MacCoy: Well this is a continued public hearing, you thinking about continuing this till next time? De Weerd: If that is staffs recommendation. MacCoy: Okay, Shari, how do you feel about this? Stiles: I would like to review it, Bruce would like to review the utilities. He has no idea what is existing out there right now. We still have the entry way corridors, we have asked that at a minimum that 20 feet be on the new right-of-way line be established along Fairview and they are showing 15. 1 think at least to be consistent with what is to the—what's been approved to the east of this property, we need to at least try and make that consistent as far as the—that's going to change their layout some as well. If Planning and Zoning Commission has some issues as far as setback that are shown, any issues such as that that you might want to give him that information now and not Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 11, 1999 Page 46 wait to a future date, so they could be working on those things. If you have any concerns at all about the layout, or about the building construction. They do have setbacks in here that are ten feet it appears from the right-of-way, though they are doing this as a planned development, the typical setbacks would be 35 feet from the right-of- way. I think it seems to be overall a nice plan, lots of landscaping. Again, I just don't feel comfortable commenting on it. MacCoy: I need more questions for the applicant from the commissioners. You can sit down I guess is what it amounts to right now. While we are waiting for the commissioners to continue review materials, anyone here who would like to speak in favor of what the applicant is requesting right now, which is a conditional use permit for the new addition. All right, lets work it the other way, since I have nobody standing up for that, does anyone here want to object to what he is requesting? Well, since nobody is coming forth, everybody has other fish to fry here. I Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman,.I move that we close the public hearing. De Weerd: No, we would want to continue it. Barbeiro: Oh, excuse me MacCoy: That's what you are looking at right now, because what Shari was just telling you is that we want to continue with material. So we need a motion, unless you want to discuss anything else right now before. De Weerd: Mr. Chairman I have a question for staff. Shari, what were the landscape buffer requirements for the family center across the street. Stiles: I'm pretty sure they were a minimum of 20 feet beyond the right-of-way, beyond the required right-of-way, future right-of-way for both Fairview and Eagle. De Weerd: What did we finally settle on? i Stiles: I think it was 20 feet Ibeyond the required right-of-way. There is going to be extensive landscaping, beyond the future right-of-way just because the area is available and they don't want it to just be dirt, so it will look like there is a lot more but that will be taken away in the future. So they are making sure all their trees are planted beyond that future right-of-way so they won't be ripped out. De Weerd: I have no further questions. MacCoy: Commissioner Bo� up do you have anything that you want to discuss or look to or what? Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 11, 1999 Page 47 Borup: I have nothing at this time. De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I guess I did have one, in the ACHD requirements, they mention an alternative transportation program. Will the site accommodate that kind of a site, or has the applicant looked at accommodating that recommendation? Clark: This is becoming a standard requirement of ACHD and all commercial projects virtually, that is a transportation management plan, an alternative transportation, they are setting up an office within ACHD or they have to work with property owners and major users in developing these things. A lot of them are in the way of what they call soft programming, which is helping with ride chairing and van pools and information on public transportation. There is no requirement here that at least I'm aware of or something such as a park and ride line. I haven't heard anything like that, I don't interpret it that way. So it might typically lead to requirements for specified locations or priority locations for van pools or car pools, preferred parking and that kind of thing, which would be --or at least as we understand the ACHD requirements here and as we work with them elsewhere (Inaudible) working with those requirements. Of course those are enforced by ACHD. De Weerd: So they have nothing specific in mind at this point? Clark: No, not that I'm aware of. Other than trying to develop those things that I said. They are quite serious about those, but as far as a specific requirement, that would be something that would be required of us when we go forward for building permits in this case. De Weerd: Okay, thanks. Borup: Mr. Chairman, I had a question for Mr. Clark. Did you have any comments on any of the staff comments? So you got a copy of this, this was back in April. Clark: The April 9th one . Borup: Yes. I read there are 22 items. I only underlined two that would probably, looks like—I don't know that it was included in. One was the sign details and the other was the utility easements etc, which I think Bruce has already mentioned. Clark: We did this for illustration, we did submit to Shari the sign information as requested. Borup: Oh, that's in our packet, I'm sorry. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 11, 1999 Page 48 Clark: Excuse me, as far as the utilities go, we need to make sure that the city engineer is familiar with the utilities that. are there because we are not anticipating constructing any new utilities to service the site. Certainly the site will have to connect to those utilities, but they were originally sized to accommodate this kind of use. They are in place and I think they will find that they are satisfactory... Borup: They just need to be indicated on the plat is all, on the plan then. Clark: They are not on the plan, that's true. Borup: Thank you. MacCoy: Would you like to, commissioners make a motion here? De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I move that we continue the conditional use permit for multi - building commercial and office, including bank facility with drive-thru to June 8. MacCoy: What is it? June 8th, is that what it is? Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, 1 second the motion. MacCoy: Okay, any discussion? Okay, all in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. MacCoy: I would like to request the commissioners to look at that sign material so we can get that resolved next time too. Freckleton: Mr. Chairman? On the last agenda item, I would like to bring up some discussion, just make some points on the utility issue. Treasure Valley Business Center was developed, utilities were installed in the major roads, however, the lots that border Fairview and Eagle—well, take that back, border Fairview and some of the internal lots in the development didn't have services at that point in time. I know a number of years ago, maybe five years ago, the developer went in and installed some services. I don't have any documentation as to where those service lines were, but to my knowledge all they were were service lines. They weren't main lines. So, that's what I would like to see on paper is what is out there. I know where the main lines are that were part of the public sewer system, but I know there are some private service lines out there somewhere. When you have multi -buildings on a site like this, I'm really doubtful that private service lines are adequate to handle it. That's what I would like to get nailed down. MacCoy: You understand that what he is after? Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 11, 1999 Page 49 Clark: Message received ITEM NO. 4: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 8,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING BY BILL & PAT GEYER—NE CORNER OF WILSON & LOCUST GROVE: MacCoy: Staff what do you have on this one? Stiles: Mr. Chairman, commissioners, again we have received some additional information on this project as well. The site plan although not conforming to our ordinance requirements I don't think it's impossible for it to conform, however, the main issues that I'm concerned about here are some kind of—we need to really pin something down on what kind of signage we are going to have there and what is going to be approved by this commission for recommendation to the City Council. We are concerned about the driveway widths. They are not providing the driveway widths that are in accordance with ordinance and with such an expanse of a building, continuous building, it's going to be very important that that access be provided with garbage trucks, delivery trucks, a lot of service area in the rear of the building here. Most of our other requirements were met. MacCoy: Is that it? Okay, Bruce do you have anything? Is the applicant here? Right in front of us, will you sign in please. BILL GEYER, 967 PARK CENTER BLVD, BOISE, ID. Geyer: I guess as you see, it's a continued item, subsequent to the continuation of the last meeting, myself and my contractor, and the architect met with Mr. Freckleton and Brad of Shari's staff and we went through the comments, which was like a bad term paper. A whole bunch of red. Anyway, we've gone through each and every line item and I believe that we have covered just about every base. I did want to draw your attention to the fact, just to make sure you know, I discussed it with (Inaudible) prior to the hearing. This is clearly a two phase project. The first phase being the one closest to Locust Grove, we just don't have the economic fire power to do both in one shot. IN fact, the first phase is being done specifically for a tenant that is Interstate (Inaudible) Corporation, who will operate an Eddy's Thrift Bakery Store on the 6,000 feet closest to Locust Grove. That's kind of the (Inaudible) genesis for this project. As far as the—I think the three outstanding issues, the sign, unfortunately I had to rely on someone else to come up with that sign design and they were not able to finish in time for the hearing tonight. I'm well aware of the kind of pet peeves of the City of Meridian. I've been involved in this thing, the D & B Supply going back five years. I was also involved in the Hollywood Video and Wingers. I've gotten a real good idea of what works and what doesn't work... 6-07-1999 9:42AM FROM CLARK DEVELOPMENT 208 3A2 2627 0 CLARK DEVELOPMENT 479 MAIN STREET BOISE, IDA140 83702 (208) 342-2625 facsimile transmittal DATE: TO: FROM: ANNA ARRANTS RE: MESSAGE: FAX: I Ej I % FAX: (208) 342-2627 Number of pages including cover sheet: If transmission is incomplete, please call (208) 342-2625 JUN 07 199 09:34 208 342 2627 PAGE.01 P. 1 6-07-1999 9:42AM June 4, 1999 FROM CLARK DEVELOPMENT 208 342 2627 CLARK DEVELOPMENT Shari`Stiles Planning & Zoning Administrator City of Meridian 33 E.Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: CUP-99-003/Treasure Valley Business Center Clark Development - Southwest corner of Eagle Road & Fairview Avenue Dear Ms. Stiles, We respectfully withdraw the Conditional Use Permit application (CUP -99-003) for the Treasure Valley Business Center at this time. Sincerly,_ vvl Bill Clark cc: Larry Sale, ACHD Gemtone, Inc. JUN 07 '99 09:34 479 Main Screer, Boise, Idaho 83702. 208!3424622 • fax XRh42.2627 • darkdev*nucron.nd 208 342 2627 PAGE.02 P. 2 i MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING: APRIL 13 1999 APPLICANT: CLARK DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER: 2 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI -BUILDING COMMERCIAL & OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILrTY WITH DRIVE-THRU (TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER) AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED MINUTES FROM 3/9/99 SEE ATTACHED MINUTES FROM 2/19/91 CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. f MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MARCH 9, 1999 PAGE 11 Smith: Second. MacCoy: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. MacCoy: I need a motion now. De Weerd: Yes, I would move that we approve the—or recommend approval for the conditional use permit for Kathleen and Wendell Lawrence with all the staff comments and ACHD comments to be included. Borup: Second. MacCoy: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. ITEM NO. 4: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SHERBROOKE HOLLOWS SUBDIVISION NOA (5 SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING LOTS ON 3.98 ACRES) BY GEM PARK II—NORTH OF VICTORY RD., EAST OF LOCUST GROVE RD.: MacCoy: We have a letter in our file given by the applicant to ask that this be moved to another meeting. Commissioners give me a motion. De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I move that we continue the public hearing for Sherbrooke Hollows Subdivision #4 to April 13tH Borup: Second. MacCoy: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. ITEM NO. 5: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI -BUILDING COMMERCIAL & OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILITY WITH DRIVE-THRU (TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER) BY CLARK DEVELOPMENT—SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAGLE RD. & FAIRVIEW AVE: MacCoy: Again, we have a letter in the file given to us by Mr. Clark the applicant requesting it moved to another date. I need a motion. MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MARCH 9, 1999 PAGE 12 De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I move that we continue the public hearing for Treasure Valley Business Center to April 13. Smith: Second. MacCoy: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. ITEM NO. 6: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 0.38 ACRES FOR PROPOSED HARTFORD SUBDIVISION BY GLENN JOHNSON HOMES — NORTH OF USTICK RD, EAST OF TEN MILE: MacCoy: Staff, do you have any comments? Stiles: Chairman MacCoy, commissioners, you have our report on this project, we have received a response from the applicant indicating that they will comply with our requirements. This project was previously approved as the Hartford Subdivision I believe either 1994 or 1995, that approval had lapsed and this new applicant has taken up the project for the 58 lots. This is just north of Ustick and East of Ten Mile approximately kitty corner from the wastewater treatment plant. We ask that you would consider our comments for both Items six and seven. We don't have any serious issues with this project. Smith: I have a question for staff. I have a vicinity map here that doesn't jive with the preliminary plat. I'm wondering which one is correct? Never mind. MacCoy: Okay, I'm going to open the public hearing, is the applicant here please? RICHARD JEWEL, 1729 S MARSHWOOD, MERIDIAN, ID. Jewel: I'm here representing the developer, Glenn Johnson Homes. MacCoy: Anything you want to say about your application? Jewel: There is one exception that we haven't fully addressed yet and that pertains to the drainage. There is high water table in that area, which as far as the homes are concerned, we'll be alleviating that problem. Making sure that the roads and houses are above the high water table. However, there is not adequate room to put your standard seepage (Inaudible) underneath draining, underground drainage. We are presently looking at the possibility of putting a pond—it's only a detention pond, not a retention pond. I've been in communications with ACHD and the Nampa/Meridian Irrigation District. So far everybody seems open to it. What we do is detain the difference between the predevelopment and the post development flows and let them out easily. After - Z- � ?I MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL I �t 99 FEBRUARY 19, 1991 \ PAGE #4 F ITEM #5: FINAL PLAT: THE LANDING #1: David Turnbowl: I'm representing the developer, here to request the acceptance of the Final Plat of The Landing Subdivision #1. Tolsma: Did this development take into consideration the school districts comments? Turnbowl: We would like to get together with the School District and discuss this. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to approve the Final Plat for The Landing #1: Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #6: COVENANTS FOR THE LANDING #1: The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Yerrington to approve the Covenants conditioned upon the attorney's approval. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #7: REQUEST BY GEMTONE, INC. FOR ONE ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT FROM F'AIRVIEW AVENUE TO TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER. Rich Allison: We've been trying to find a way to accomodate their access needs which are principally two access points on Fairview. A large retail center to accomodate clothing store, farm equipment, tire store, realignment center, convenience store and gas station all those in one user. The user would use approximately 12 to 15 thousand square feet of store, it is a multi state user called Intermountain Farmers. As you may note from the Treasure Valley Business Center Phase I development within blocks one through five, block one they currently have three access points. What we are asking is that we may receive one additional access points so that we could relocate these at the lot lines themselves, which would allow for traffic flow through the entire project. Being two access points on parcel five one from Hickory, the second which would be on Fairview and then the others which would align on Fairview. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to approve the request by Gemtone for an additional access point.on Fairview Avenue to Treasure Valley Business Center on the lot lines. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #8: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: Myers: The new fire suits came in and we'll try to have them here next meeting for you to look at. Kingsford: We have two seats on the Economic Development Corp. which need to be filled the term has ran out. At this time I'd like to nominate Walt Morrow for a three year term and Wally Lovan for a two year term. Mayor HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ROBERT D. CORRIE A Good Place to Live tn&Jl Members CITY OF MERIDIAN CHARLES ROUNTREE 33 EAST IDAHO GLENN BENTLEY MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 RON ANDERSON Phone (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 KEITH BIRD MEMORANDUM: To: Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City En inee Shari Stiles, P&Z Administrator LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208)884-4264 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208)884-5533 April 9, 1999 Re: Request for Conditional Use Permit for Multi -building Commercial & Office Use including Bank Facility with Drive-thru on 14.14 Acres by Clark Development We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: 1: This property is designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as Existing Urban. 2. As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose additional restrictions/conditions. 3. No utilities are shown on the site plan with details to indicate how the individual buildings will be served. 4. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. 5. No signage details were submitted. Detailed signage needs to be included as part of this application. 6. Provide screened trash enclosures. Coordinate locations and construction requirements with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc. Provide copy of approval from Sanitary Service, Inc., with submittal of site plans prior to applying for building permits. 7. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 8. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non- domestic ondomestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. CUP -99-005 ClarkDevelopment.CUP P&Z Commission/Mayor & Council April 9, 1999 Page 2 9. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-2-414 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 10. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-2-414.D.4 and 11-2-414.D.5 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 11. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 12. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-2-414.D.3. 13. Provide minimum five -foot -wide sidewalks along Fairview Avenue, Eagle Road, E. Jewell Street, Olive Avenue, E. Florence Street, and throughout developoment in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-9-606.B. 14. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 15. Site plan requires extensive revision to provide future required rights-of-way and desired 35 - foot -wide landscape buffer beyond required right-of-way. Revised site plan needs to detail all existing and proposed utilities for review by the Meridian Public Works Department, trash enclosures, etc. Designer is to coordinate sizing and routing of sanitary sewer and water within the development with the Public Works Department. 16. Provide the Public Works Department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored with the Meridian Water Department to determine whether adequate fire protection exists. 17. Applicant shall be required to enter into an Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian. 18. Provide a minimum of one (1) three-inch (Y) caliper tree per 1,500 s.£ asphalt. Due to the issues of entryway corridors, trees in addition to the required three-inch caliper trees should be provided. Provide detailed landscape plan for review and approval. 19. Provide handicapped accessible parking spaces in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. All building and parking lot construction needs to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. CUP -99-003 ClarkDevelopment.CUP P&Z Commission/Mayor & Council April 9, 1999 Page 3 20. Drainage swales should not be within the landscape setbacks along Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue. 21. No City water will be allowed for landscape irrigation. Underground sprinkling utilizing a pressurized irrigation system needs to be provided throughout development. 22. These comments are by no means all-inclusive. Staff reserves the right to prepare additional comments when a revised site plan has been received, and recommends this item be continued until May 11, 1999. CUP -99-003 ClarkDevelopment.CUP ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report MCU99-003 Meridian Family Center SWC Fairview Avenue & Eagle Road The applicant is requesting conditional use approval for a 217,600 -square feet of office/ retail c� shopping center. The 14 -acre site is located on the southwest corner of Eagle Road and C17-5 Fairview Avenue in Meridian. This development is estimated to generate 4,000 additional .- vehicle trips per day upon full occupancy based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. On September 23, 1998, the Commission reviewed and approved MCU -17-98, conditional use approval for an 848,000 -square foot retail shopping center. That site is 74.74 -acres and located on the southeast corner of Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue in Meridian. The development is estimated to generate 26,950 -additional vehicle trips per day upon full C� occupancy based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual and the submitted traffic study. 619,868 -square feet are proposed to be developed in the first phase of the project. sm— Roads impacted by this development: Eagle Road Fairview Avenue Jewell Street Florence Street Olive Avenue ACHD Commission Date - March 24 1999 - 7:00 p.m. 1)�_U' C --E' T\7]EJ) MAR 2 s 1999 City of bTeri"Ji a;1 City Clerk :J,.,. zxlcC ' ^-v wi t -LESLIE —O L_,MEADOWGRASS GRANGEP--._! — CLovER.MEADOWS ^ i q LU' --- i yr w a, — US -- �i o -- - - ITE - F WILSON X -._.....JEW O Oqy SUNNYDALE _ IE p DRIFTWOOD -- . __ r PRESIDENT .___... 8—COMMERCIAL_.. o .., � CLILIVE..- w _.. _ _ - 4 _.- --... _... _- > � LANA. RK__-- rtt i .......-. _ _..- .-FRANKLIN....._._-.� SPRINGWOOD -- _ ILR-4 RT R1 s I--- �--R T------__— �" RTj RT I� i s l t � ✓ ifs- � - RT •7 2 , I i L -O' RT- C- RT I R� RT i RT c I IIVA Nu � I I RI f �rLr Site .. tl'• I I� • I ( I t � RT .1 r`if1 i- T l-��\ I 1� I L ~ •�� RT I.L RT . ... ... I -- TL n�t-1 i i c 9F� '��51,�X i9oFQ!`�liQ•{i„�� YS�r d4'15�A1ix�`���r>6F�E'i�d'iti:iX � .d I S n .:p�• � <,,• • iii _ r n I wi`!d �,,��'� i�'µ � I I � I in :iega 'I:1 i ` S Yli IY-pYtY �� aY I a3 •M Q � V J ag�� aY a YY YY wSY z�% C/I :�7 �J c� ° .. w _ epi..••- iN V[ A p67+,:s L a �� G F �� A e s� �6j � e •� �� i s P � � I S n � <,,• • iii _ r n I wi`!d �,,��'� i�'µ � I I � I I � I Q � :�7 �J c� ° .. w _ epi..••- iN V[ '! p67+,:s L a �� G F �� A e s� �6j � e •� �� i s P � � I � <,,• • iii I wi`!d �,,��'� i�'µ � j D I = 3d u b C/I �: aNT.iOLM o cA I af 1 _ m Z_ _ IE II rnI IIII I fill 11fluilllli; ni III a 11-a I il� II i � r f qp� I = JAL 1 I ,411 l i�J� I� r�;1/jtyr 1811111: J;11L1 CllflIIIIIIII'I �� I i IIIIIIIitiirYC� EAGLE ROAD RETAIL do —0, �yWW A CLARK DE LOPMETIT !Tad , jam •: 7 °� y N T�¢E.15LRE J�LL£7 d13iNE 95 P=�2C j D I u II rnI IIII I fill 11fluilllli; ni III a 11-a I il� II i � r f qp� I = JAL 1 I ,411 l i�J� I� r�;1/jtyr 1811111: J;11L1 CllflIIIIIIII'I �� I i IIIIIIIitiirYC� EAGLE ROAD RETAIL do —0, �yWW A CLARK DE LOPMETIT !Tad , jam •: 7 °� y N T�¢E.15LRE J�LL£7 d13iNE 95 P=�2C Facts and Findings: A. General Information 1. General Data ' eagle Road _(awte Highway 5555) Principal arterial Traffic count 27,564 on 10/97, peak hour count on 9/8/98 = 2801 vph s/o Fairview Avenue 1,390 -feet of frontage 140 -feet existing right-of-way (70 -feet from section line) Comply with ITD requirements Eagle Road is improved with a 78 feet of pavement with five travel lanes and no curb, gutter or sidewalk. Eagle Road is State Highway 55 and is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) C4=4 Fairview Avenin CIZZ: Principal arterial r—, Traffic count 21,900 on 10/97, peak hour count on 9/8/98 = 2026 vph e/o Eagle Road 720 -feet of frontage 100 to 108 -feet existing right-of-way (50 to 54 -feet from section line) 120 to 132 -feet required right-of-way (60 to 66 -feet from section line) Fairview Avenue is improved with a 68 feet of pavement with five travel lanes and no curb, gutter or sidewalk. C7= Florence Street •-� Local commercial street with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 360 -feet of frontage 60 -feet existing right-of-way (30 -feet from centerline) No additional right-of-way required Florence Street is constructed as two 24 -foot roadways separated by a 14 -foot median island. The roadway has curb and gutter but no sidewalks. This roadway segment was platted and constructed as part of the Treasure Valley Business Center. MCU99003.CMM Page 2 Owner - c Applicant -Clark Development c� I -L - Existing zoning I -L - Requested zoning 74.74 - Acres 0 - Proposed dwelling units 217,600 - Total square feet of proposed building 0 - Square feet of existing building, 145 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) C� West Ada - Impact Fee Benefit Zone Western Cities - Impact Fee Assessment District 2. Effected Streets ' eagle Road _(awte Highway 5555) Principal arterial Traffic count 27,564 on 10/97, peak hour count on 9/8/98 = 2801 vph s/o Fairview Avenue 1,390 -feet of frontage 140 -feet existing right-of-way (70 -feet from section line) Comply with ITD requirements Eagle Road is improved with a 78 feet of pavement with five travel lanes and no curb, gutter or sidewalk. Eagle Road is State Highway 55 and is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) C4=4 Fairview Avenin CIZZ: Principal arterial r—, Traffic count 21,900 on 10/97, peak hour count on 9/8/98 = 2026 vph e/o Eagle Road 720 -feet of frontage 100 to 108 -feet existing right-of-way (50 to 54 -feet from section line) 120 to 132 -feet required right-of-way (60 to 66 -feet from section line) Fairview Avenue is improved with a 68 feet of pavement with five travel lanes and no curb, gutter or sidewalk. C7= Florence Street •-� Local commercial street with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 360 -feet of frontage 60 -feet existing right-of-way (30 -feet from centerline) No additional right-of-way required Florence Street is constructed as two 24 -foot roadways separated by a 14 -foot median island. The roadway has curb and gutter but no sidewalks. This roadway segment was platted and constructed as part of the Treasure Valley Business Center. MCU99003.CMM Page 2 Jewell Street Local commercial street with no bike lane designation Traffic count not available 360 -feet of frontage 60 -feet of existing right-of-way No additional right-of-way required c= Jewell Street is improved with a 45 -foot street section with curbs and gutters but no sidewalks. Olive Avenue Local commercial street with no bike lane designation Traffic count not available 800 -feet of frontage 60 -feet of right-of-way (30 -feet from centerline) No additional right-of-way required � Olive Avenue is improved with a 45 -foot street section with curbs and gutters but no ;---� sidewalks. B. Utility street cuts in new pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. C. Eagle Road (State Highway 55) is under the jurisdiction of Idaho Transportation Department C} (ITD). Application materials should be submitted to ITD for review and requirements of that cl�= Department and the applicant should submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said *=� requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The applicant may contact District III Traffic Engineer Lance Johnson at 334-8340. D. Eagle Road traffic volumes have increased an average of 16% over the last seven years. Traffic has increased an average of 20% over the last four years. The APA model assumes a 4% annual growth rate until the Year 2015. While it is unlikely that the 20% growth rate will be C= maintained, the APA forecast is likely low, based on observed development rates and counts. E. Evaluation of the traffic analysis summary and supplemental field analysis by staff provided the following information: 1. The proposed project is estimated to generate 4,000 total daily vehicle trips. The actual additional traffic volume added to the street system is approximately 3,000 daily vehicle trips because of passby trips already on the adjacent roadways. �+ 2. The proposed project is estimated to generate 400 total peak hour vehicle trips., cIZ= adding approximately 1,750 to 2,020 peak hour vehicle trips to the external trip network because of passby trips already on the adjacent roadways. 3. The anticipated 400 peak hour vehicle trips are the result a trip rate of 3.03 peak hour vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet of floor area. This number is in compliance with the data provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). District staff completed peak hour traffic counts at two smaller local shopping centers. The observed numbers matched the ITE data for a similar sized shopping center. Staff therefore accepts the submitted figures for peak hour trip generation. 4. The project site was originally reviewed as a light industrial center subdivision in 1985 as part of the Treasure Valley Buisness Center. NiCU99003.CNIM Page 3 5. The submitted site plan shows several driveways on Jewell Street, Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue. 6. Jewell Street is local/commercial road. 7. Florence Street is a public street and designated as a local road. Florence/Eagle intersection is STOP controlled on the Florence Street. 8. Florence Street is a local/commercial public street west of Eagle Road. The applicant is not proposing to construct a driveway onto the roadway. The roadway has a center C4 landscaped median from Eagle Road to Olive Avenue. CIZ= 9. Eagle Road is an access controlled roadway under the jurisdiction of ITD. One access point was deeded to this parcel by ITD. The applicant is proposing two access points (including Florence Street). Florence Street is the only access point that has been constructed at this time. 10. Hichory Avenue is a public street from Fairview Avenue that connects to Jewell Street which will provide access from this site to Fairveiw Avenue. Hickory Avenue and Jewell Street are designated as a local commercial roads. Hickory Avenue/Fairview Avenue intersection will be signal controlled in the future. 4� 11. In addition to Hickory Avenue, there is one other proposed driveway on Fairview Avenue. The driveway is proposed for full access at this time and meets the required 440 -feet of separation between the Fairview Avenue/Eagle Road intersection. The driveway should have a minimu of 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and outbound traffic lanes. This access point would be restricted to right-in/right-out operation as Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue traffic volumes increase and would be eliminated entirely in future stages of the plan's implementation for Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection. 4 12. Both Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue are principal arterials.. As such, Level of Service (LOS) E is an acceptable condition for the intersections on both roadways. 13. Both Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue are five lane facilities abutting the project site with free right -turn lanes on all legs of the intersection. 14. The Eagle Road Access Study (1997) recommends allowing only one access point to Eagle Road between Florence Street and Fairview Avenue. This access point would be restricted to right-in/right-out operation as Eagle Road traffic volumes increase and would be eliminated entirely in future stages of the plan's implementation for Eagle Road. 15. The Eagle Road Access Study recommended a future grade separated interchange for the Eagle/Fairview intersection. 16. The current APA model assumes an average annual increase of traffic on Eagle Road of 4%. The observed traffic increases have averaged 20% per year over the last four years. 17. The Eagle/Fairview intersection currently operates at LOS D. 18. The Eagle/Fairview intersection will operate at LOS F with the existing geometry and the "existing plus project" traffic volumes. The intersection can be made to operate at an acceptable LOS E condition with the provisions of dual left turn lanes and free right Clz� turn lanes on all approaches. This change will require moving at least two signal poles and adding pavement as well as restriping. The signals currently provide pedestrian actuated movement across Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road, and this provision for pedestrians must be maintained after any modifications to the intersection. 19. The Eagle/Florence Street intersection will operate at LOS C with the `existing plus project" traffic volumes. 20. The Fairview/Hickory Avenue intersection will operate at LOS C with the existing plus project traffic volumes. The intersection will require signalization on all approaches in order to maintain a good LOS. The traffic signal will be constructed by the District when needed. MCU99003.CMM Pa_e 4 21. Both driveways on Eagle Raod and Fairview Avenue will be full access site driveways but will operate similar to right-in/right-out facilities becuase the through traffic volumes on both streets are so high that there will be few opportunities for left -turns at any of the non -signalized driveways. These driveways will operate at an acceptable LOS E or better for outbound left turns and inbound left turns. The demand for left turns at the driveway intersections far exceeds the available capacity. These intersections only function acceptably because the excess traffic can be diverted to a signalized c..� intersections at Fairview Avenue and Hickory Avenue. This condition is caused by a C175 combination of high traffic volumes on the arterial streets and at the site driveways. 22. Due to the high traffic volumes on both Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue, the remaining, unsignalized, full access site driveways will operate at an acceptable LOS E or better for outbound right turns and inbound left turns if the signalized intersections are constructed as shown above. F. ACHD contracted with EARTH -TECH Engineering Inc. to perform a third party review of the development at the southeast corner of Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road. This second consultant's review produced had a less optimistic view of the future traffic volumes on Eagle Road. They were less comfortable with APA's forecast of 4% annual growth and used recent traffic volumes to forecast higher future volumes on Eagle Road. The result of this assumption is that the roadway intersections will be completely overwhelmed with traffic from this project and the background traffic volumes. G. The preceding analyses identified the following public street improvements needed to accommodate the additional traffic created by this project and the normal growth of 4 background traffic: 1. Construct deceleration lanes at all intersections on Eagle road abutting the site. 2. Construct curb, gutter and an eastbound lane to Fairview from a point 500 -feet west of Eagle Road to the eastern boundary of the site. H. Fairview Avenue is an ACHD classified roadway and, as such, would be eligible for the use of impact fee revenue to increase their capacity, if such improvement is included in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) and the Five Year Work Program (FYWP). Idaho Code also allows the use of road impact fee revenue on State Highways, such as Eagle Road for capacity enhancement. Only one of the improvements recommended by the traffic impact study, the Eagle/Pine signal, is included in the FYWP. Some of the recommended improvements will be necessary in the future to accommodate traffic growth without the traffic that will be generated by this proposal, and the District would be constructing those improvements at the appropriate time, partially funded from impact fee revenue. The large volume that will be generated by the proposed development accelerates the need for those improvements. Staff has evaluated the relative benefits that will be realized by the gyral traveling public from the various recommended improvements and suggests that they be considered in two categories, system C17.; improvements and site related improvements as follows: System Improvements are capital improvements other than a site -related improvement which is a public facility and is designed to provide service to the community at large. The costs of these improvements would be offset from the Road Impact Fees for the project: Construct dual left turn lanes on the Fairview Avenue legs of the Eagle/Fairview intersection. MCU99003.CNIM Page 5 b. Construct curb, gutter and an eastbound lane from 500 -feet west (the end of existing improvements) of the Eagle Road intersection to the Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection. C. rDedicate`sufficient-additional-right=of=way.to.total;66=fe'et'fromcenterline of Fairview Avenue from the intersection with Eagle Road for a distance of 650 - feet east of the intersection, then taper to 60 -feet from centerline in 200 -feet, and continue 60 -feet of right-of-way to the east boundary of the development. 2. Site -related improvements are capital improvements or right-of-way dedication for direct access to and/or within the proposed project or development. The costs of these improvements must be borne by the developer of the project: a. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on"Fa`irview:AVenue abutting the site. b. Construct a five-foot sidewalk onrEagk Road abutting the site. C. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Olive Avenoe abutting the site. d. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on -.Florence -Street abutting the site. e. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Jewe ll.Street rabutting the site. ff. I. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff has indicated the need for a Park & Ride location at the applicant's site. �The-District'reg0ests'that applidant'grant:the` District_ aneasement'f6—r.-Y10'to 02=space-Park-&J. Ride_ area- at;this.site� Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. J. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program L for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160 for further information. K. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, car pools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. C:�Z4 c-7= L. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement for the parcel to the east to use this parcel for access to the public streets prior to issuance'of a building permit (or other required permits). The District intends to require a similar agreement of the owners of the parcel to the east if they are the subject of a future development application. M. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be placed on future development of this parcel. MCU99001CM NI Pa(e 6 N. The District completed an access control plan for the entire Eagle Road corridor in 1997. An important recommendation of that study was the proposal for aigrade =separated -interchange at the Eagle/Fairview intersection. Although construction of the interchange is anticipated beyond the 20-year planning period, the Long Range Transportation Plan establishes the policy thatsthe-District;shoold`preserve,the-right=of=way: now:to ensure.that:the`needed-landk twill-be~available`when7construction-begins. Therefore, the applicant should be required to dedicate or otherwise agree to not encumber sufficient land area to accommodate the C:�Z4 proposed interchange design. The owner will be compensated for all additional right-of-way C7= from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. tlf.the-land.,is_dedicated-the,owner may,entecinto'.a, rlicense-agreement with •the-Districtto-use,the-preserved•right=of=way:until the District tconstructs-the-interchange. If another form of preservation is approved by the Commission, the developer and the District should enter into an agreement providing for the use of the right-of-way for the interchange. O. The existing transportation system will be adequate to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development only with the additional requirements outlined within this report. The existing transportation system is not adequate for the anticipated traffic volumes without improvement. Recommendations: Special Recommendations to Meridian City: c= 1. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building consider formation of an Alternative Transportation Program. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Mrs. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) are urged to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes C� this site or is adjacent to this development. The District would appreciate the formation of such an entity by this complex. Special Recommendations to ITD: 1. The applicant should be required to construct a deceleration taper at the driveway on Eagle C4=: Road. The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: Comply with requirements of ITD for Eagle Road (State Highway 55) frontage. Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Contact District IiI Traffic Engineer Lance Johnson at 334-8340. NICU99001CMM Pa -e 7 2. Dedicate sufficient additional right-of-way to total 66 -feet from centerline of Fairview Avenue from the intersection with Eagle Road for a distance of 650 -feet west of the intersection. The right-of-way should be dedicated by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, c� in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 3. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way abutting Eagle Road for the future Eagle Road Interchange. Coordinate the right-of-way requirements with District staff. The right-of-way is generally described as being a minimum of 226 -feet wide (113 -feet east of centerline) from Fairview Avenue south for 600 -feet. The right-of-way needs then taper to 146 -feet wide (73 -feet from centerline to a point 1,400 -feet south of Fairview Avenue. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee ��---� administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. It is understood that ITD will reimburse the District for the cost of this right-of-way acquisition. 4. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way abutting Fairview Avenue for the future Eagle Road interchange. Coordinate the right-of-way requirements with District staff. The right-of-way is generally described as being a minimum of 176 -feet wide (84 -feet south of centerline) from k Eagle Road east for 500 -feet, then tapering to 120 -feet (60 from centerline) at 1,000 feet east 4� of Eagle Road. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to CIZ= existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 5. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Fairview Avenue abutting the site prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. The construction plans for the development showing the sidewalk must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the site prior to issuance of any C= Certificate of Occupancy. The construction plans for the development showing the sidewalk must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Construct the driveway on Fairview Avenue as proposed. The driveways shall be located as proposed on the site plan dated 1/7/98, prepared by BRS Architects and on file with the District: approximately 440 -feet, west of Eagle Road. The driveway on Fairview Avenue is to be constructed as a full access driveway with a width limited to 40 -feet. The minimum storage length shall be 100 -feet. Install a 36" by 36 high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Fairview Avenue. Construct pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii. 8. Construct a driveway on Eagle Road, located as proposed 440 -feet south of Fairview Avenue as a full access driveway. The driveway width should be limited to 40 -feet. The minimum storage length should be 100 -feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Eagle Road. This driveway may be restricted to right-in/right-out movement in the.future. Construct a deceleration lane for the driveway. 9. Construct a deceleration taper at the driveway on Eagle Road. Coordinate the design with ITD staff. MCU99003.CMM Page 8 10 11 14 The applicant shall be required to construct sidewalk abutting the site on Florence Street, Olive Avenue, and Jewell Street. Coordinate the location of the sidewalk with District staff. Other than the access point specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Fairview Avenue is prohibited. Construct a 30 to 36 -foot wide driveway on Olive Avenue, located approximately 145 -feet south of Florence Street. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Records Drive. Construct a 30 to 36 -foot wide driveway on Olive Avenue, located approximately 160 -feet north of Florence Street. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Records Drive. Construct a 30 to 36 -foot wide driveway on Jewell Street, located approximately 30 -feet east of the west property line. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Records Drive. Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. he written request shall be submitted to the District no later than :00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD CommisGinn ar•.tion Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within two weeks of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The equest for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #188, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. MCU99003.CNIM Page 9 L= CI= C= 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 8. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. MCU99003.CMM Pa -e 10 MAY 1 �q9q ;MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING: IMAY 11 1999 , _NNWG L APPLICANT: CLARK DEVELOPMENT ITIENI NUMBER: 3 REQUEST: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATIC N—CONDITi©NAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI -BUILDING COMMERCIAL 3 OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILrrY INITH DRFVF--THRU LANES FOR TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS "--**-F-R AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ,ill Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ARCHITECTS 1087 l6'est Ricer Street, Sreite 160 Boise, Idaho 83703 T ie,ohone 308 336-8370 Far 303.336-8.380 May 7, 1999 City of Meridian Planning & Zoning 200 E. Carlton Ave., Suite 201 Meridian, ID 83642 Attn: Shari Stiles Planning & Zoning Administrator Dear Ms. Stiles: Re: Clark Development Treasure Valley Business Park BRS Project No. 98196 Per your Staff's instructions, we are submitting today the revised site plan delineating the "urban interchange" boundaries and those additional items identified in your memorandum of April 9, 1999. It is very important to note (and very obvious) that the ACHD- required right-of-way does very little to the original site design, as the large site with minor adjustments can easily accommodate this proposed development. However, the long-term effect of a raised overpass and limited access will be an absolute deterrent to the intersection users some time down the road. As it turns out, the approximate loss of R.O.W. is about 1.5 acres, and this results in the loss of some 4,000 s.f. of space and about 60 parking spaces. The site already has utilities in place and, according to Briggs Engineering, will require very minor adjustments. They believe this would be better accomplished in the Building Permit procedure. We have also included our proposed sign package which incorporates a consistent sign criteria throughout. We are aware of the other items noted and will be addressed, as is the usual custom, during the Building Permit procedure. Q M City of Meridian Clark Development/Treasure Valley Business Park May 7, 1999 Page 2 Since the design and required resolutions are minimal at best, we trust the Staff Report will be limited. However, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate calling. We would appreciate an expeditious response. BRS:cw Encl. cc: Clark Development The Land Group - Doug a 0 2 2 A 2 0 / § ƒ / a i m 2 y A 9 T % \ - 2 & m 2 � a ' / � k m / / � q ' 2 2 2 2 7 ƒ � � 7 � � Z c 0 2 2 A 2 0 / § ƒ / y \ m 2 � a ' q ' 2 � m � Z c i O 0 2 2 A 2 0 CUSTOMER APPROVAL °fSIsNNU. I her2hy approve all specifications of flys 3241-99 -i pnnt except as noted. I understand that ' the electnca! hookup wi!t be by others. PAGE 1 Customer Signatun? Date I °f ONE N ITI I> z `71.1 119 Elm I n w �9 S( OLIVE AVENUE c) T- i I Tu(:fm CIA yl RETAIL C.O"FLEI FOR: . Lie t!; Em, im wm RpRIVERsr LHM, L,4F:J-Z-)E\�/EL(')F-)l IE�-iT ♦ FAX (M 336-IM TREA5URE VALLEl- ffU51NE55 PL' < ARCHITECTS 5 m r r m �I E a EAG -E ROAD t s t C 6 RETAIL COMPLEX FOR: +� RMIRR as way n� a er N9 ' CLARK DEVELOPMENT�� d TREASURE VALLET BUSINESS PARC AEiGltITBCTf y m Jill l p r 3 ��$i8l w=r i i� ;9�R RRW [[r f'u 36 �R y ¢�§¢p m C] lk D 3 s N 5 m r r m �I E a EAG -E ROAD t s t C 6 RETAIL COMPLEX FOR: +� RMIRR as way n� a er N9 ' CLARK DEVELOPMENT�� d TREASURE VALLET BUSINESS PARC AEiGltITBCTf y MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING: MAY 11 1999 APPLICANT: CLARKDEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER: 3 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MULIT-BUILDING COMMERCIAL & OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILITY WITH DRIVE-THRU LANES FOR TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER AGENCY , COMMENTS CITY CLERK: c SEE ATTACHED MINUTES FROM 4/13/99 CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN" SCHOOL DISTRICT: t � MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: t TM ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER:' ° US WEST: s INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: n-ru�o• _ All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. s 5 1 MERIDiAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ' APRIL 13, 1999 PAGE 5 guidelines as set forth in section 11-2-410D of the Zoning and Development Ordinance of the City of Meridian, the established record and applicable law that the applicant met the requisite accessory use standards given the foregoing, the subject application for family home, family childcare home accessory use is set forth herein shall be granted and the use allowed subject to the conditions imposed herein. The accessory use shall be subject to review by the city upon notice to the applicant. MacCoy: All in favor? Borup: Second. MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. ITEM NO. 2: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI -BUILDING COMMERCIAL & OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILITY WITH DRIVE-THRU (TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER) BY CLARK DEVELOPMENT —SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAGLE RD & FAIRVIEW AVE: MacCoy: Item No. 2 this evening has been requested and that reminds me, I've got to make this'statement tonight too, I forgot to start with. How many is here for Item No. 2, 3, 11, 12 & 13? Okay, those Items tonight 2, 3, 11, 12 & 13 have been requested to be pulled by the applicants off of this agenda and will be revisited on May 11, at our meeting at that time. De Weerd: The information that we are already getting in May is quite substantial and to add these too on is going to make May quite a meeting. MacCoy: That will be the staffs responsibility to juggle some of the ones down the line. What is going to happen—May is full already, June we are working on right now. It will be up to the staff and anytime we bring anything up like this and have to move it back, then they take and look at what in May and they make decisions there. Borup: I think that was maybe the question there, is it fair to the people who have got their application in on a timely basis for May to be pushed back by people who didn't do stuff earlier. MacCoy:, The staff calls them up and asks them. By our ordinance... Borup: No, I understand that, but I think maybe the question is it fair to the people on May's agenda... MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 13, 1999 PAGE 6 MacCoy: Well, you are jumping ahead of the game here, staff takes a look at this—we may because our ordinance says that we have the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of the month to sit for doing our work. It works out that there is not a movement that can be made, then we are back on the line again for the 4th Tuesday of the month, or a special meeting if you want to put it that way. Borup: Or can some of these be moved to June? MacCoy: That's the staff's responsibility. Borup: Right, okay. MacCoy: Moving on to Item No. 4... Rossman: Mr. Chairman, can we have those numbers again that were continued? MacCoy: 2, 3, 11, 12, & 13. De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, do we need a motion on those? MacCoy: Well, you can use one if you want to. This is either applicants that have requested it, so it's not our decision. De Weerd: No, do we need to officially continue them? Rossman: Yes. MacCoy: I guess that would probably be a good motion to make. De Weerd: Okay, Mr. Chairman, I would like to move that we continue the public hearing for the request for conditional use permit by the Treasure Valley Business Center. Borup: Second. MacCoy: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. ITEM NO. 3: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SHERBROOKE HOLLOWS SUBDIVISION NO.4 BY GEM PARK II -- NORTH OF VICTORY RD & EAST OF LOCUST GROVE RD: a CLARK DEVELOPMENT April 13, 1999 Shari Stiles Planning & Zoning Administrator City of Meridian 33 E.Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 APR 15 1999 CITY OF MERIDIAN fUk�. G & ZONING Re: Request for Conditional Use, Permit for Multi -building Commercial & Office Use tTrta s�;v�A �/a/lP„ Buser<,u-r Dear Shari, We are in receipt of your memo to the Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and City Council dated April 9, 1999: We agree with the recommendation to defer action until May 11, 1999 and will work with you in the meantime on the additional items listed on your report. If you have any questions of concerns, please call me at 342-2625. Sincerely, Bill Clark cc: Billy Ray Strite 479 Main Street, Boise, Idaho 83702 a 2081342-2625 • Fax 2081342-2627 9 clarkdev@micron.net TO'30Ud 11b0b6E6 ZS:OT 66, SE ade l Fs', a :nm ry s@BPd 40 e18Q lL9L BION u8� &V460d r (/ / 1001 RETAIL COUPIEX FOR: 10V WEST RIVER Kwan _ a,..as >•R CLARK DEvEL0PMENT ♦ 5q�, .la3 TREASURE VALLCV DUaNESS PAkX ♦11CNIT<CTO ti0 39Vd dnO69 QNVI 3Hl TVOVGE6 �� OG:60- 6662/9Z/b0 ** TX STATUS REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 32 04/09 12 08 208 336 8380 ------------------------------------ 200 E. Carlton, Ste. 201 Meddlan, ID 83642 Phone., 884-5533 Fax 887.1297 Fax AS OF APR 09 '99 12:09 PAGE.01 PUBLIC WORKS -MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD9 STATUS EC --S 01'04" 004 228 OK ----------------------------------------- City of Meridian Planning & Zoning Dept. To: iii 11 Y 9CL� S fi i tC From: Sonya Day Fax: 336 `6380 Date y _ q _q q Phone° Pages: (Including cover ,Meet) Re:-T—v-eVo_ll e y S Parte cc: ❑ Urgent .0*or Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle -Comments, ----..... -- --- ---- FEB-03-1999 1022 BRS ARCHITECTS CM OF MEMLn N APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 208 336 8360 P / 3 YE C T� FEB NAME: Clark Development PHONE: 342-2625 -- ADDRESS: 479 Main Strut, Boise, ID 83702 GENERAL LOCATION: Southwest corner Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE: Multi -building commercial/ office, including bank facility with drive-through ZONING CLASSIFICATION: IL I certify that for itt b=ztion contained h=in is true and correct. WA.�- CAL, Signature of Applies sow se�tyNumber 4Ag1�'— LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to cstablisbed proccdm -, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that tba M=dm Planning arca Zoning Commission wiv hold a PubUc Dearing in rhe Medd= Chy Ball on at _.a1. The purpose of the Hearing is to consider a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT submitted by for the lnoPe�ry 8y descnbed as located at SUBDIVISION, BLOCK-, LOT -TO FEB 04 '99 09:35 20e 342 2627 PAGE.02 ARCHITECTS BRS Architects, A.LA. 1087 West River Street, Suite 160 Boise, Idaho 83702 Telephone 208 336-8370 Fax 208 336-8380 City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Boise, ID 83642 February 1, 1999 Attn: Shari Stiles, Zoning Administrator Dear Ms. Stiles: Re: Clark Development Treasure Valley Bus. Park BRS Project No. 98196 As required by ordinance, and pursuant to our discussions, the applicant, Clark Development, respectfully requests Conditional Use approval to construct a mixed-use commercial - office project. - This project of, some 14.14 acres on two parcels is located on the southwest corner of Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue in an IL Zone and is presently vacant. Three of the existing lots will include more than one building. Comprised of twelve buildings; including a.bank facility with drive-through and a restaurant, this mixed-use proposal includes a 30' wide, landscaped frontage consistent with the City's Gateway requirements, and a total landscaped area over 10%. Access is provided by existing public streets within the approved subdivision, as well as two deeded access points; one each on both Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road. These two access points form the terminus for all the interior site access on Parcel 13. We believe this request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets or exceeds the intent of the requested Conditional use. Thus, we trust a positive recommendation for approval will result. Should you have any questions and/or clarifications regarding this application, please do not hesitate calling. BRS:cw cc: Clark Development - MSL . i2 GNA 8-J 2 1-16 1, 6 y SPICIVi WAREMM EWE thin da•y 6f mads r/ 990, Ukaklib- INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPARY,a Nebraska 3036', LW Freeway,, Suite 1500, Dallas, County a 753 4, Grantor, &nd'tGEMTOHE,, INC., an Idaho Box 2727, Boise*, Idaho 83701, Grantee: NESSZT9,';,That Grantor; 'for and in""consideration $ 1 and other good and valuable Ong atrati6*f1'•r-,to qzan'Edr paid, by, Grantee.,' -the receipt whereof ISI 4• • "has' granted, bargained, .i 1J'I ...... .,�dnd, by, 6V,C,On1V4�.Qd%% i 'these presents does grant, bargain, n assigns, its SU�desiblrs and pr6partj '(,ffProp6kty1•) situate in, the I,* lity":of'Adn Ilia S .�ai�t of 'Xdaho, mono -c&&'S1G`_ 4d'in Exhibit 'kittached hereto and heteby L4 O'f. This! dead !18 made SUBJECT TO that following! `Aii'taxon ':and all 422soaments,,or, if .'payabls;in: instikllmant�, all installments of '16;,ried upon or *33e8sad',againstithe nx :premises'described in Exhibit A which -becam'becameior may becialn"s due. and., payable in the year 1990 shall hall be prorajed 53 the date of delivery of this deed, by Grantor.,. to ',Grantee siid date being the All. 31bt day "Of 19901,.: and Grantee I WV &85=Sa ...... vr,,to *reimburse Grantor 'end agrees Pay, Por, such'ta:kas and assesIments and - i'nst'Aliments, of 'assessmqnts - applicable to the perioe;:siAbgaqRitht to the date of delivery of this dead - all taxes and All assawaments and d -'all ihitillrent's of assessments which may become a iil ivabj.g,aftsr said yearl and LN 1-1 "re3t Nrittions and limitations 118pos o by public authority, and any easements, f;restribtionz, Occceptiohs, reservations, ......... ..'Conditib'rii, and/or .:outstanding rights of record, :i C1 but"not -limited to, th® following! :, Exaeption and reservation of all -i), ,rdineral iis'and .'all Mineral rights contained in ',",that': ddrtain` ',Quitcl aim Dead dated July 23, 1984 Y r f 7 5ii, pig* 41 A 4 1239000971L dtrl'�z -:1ndutriijD%vi:oPM6ntCOirar zti�n to Upland k MnYl -identified i n 'the reebrds,, of Grantor as UPRd- Law. Di partinent 2-122172-2, Audit� No: 37174, and 30; .1924 -in 01fic thQ:*.Q of the Ada�-`Coujjty, 'IdAho aaInstrument No. 6h"Plat . "(-Plat Of." ar ;pha'aa, I n I.A 6 'recor a d the"County -Ada o 'n y; -3:d&h o:C u t �Oi ogook ,53 of and., all &kdj9h6wh?':thVrg0h -and qcnditlons to app, 'd Y, revel jl uding", the C) V'thol�t'' limliat ion, doolarition Of-,J20VGnarjtS,_ d' restrictions, ghting'. 'I orW, and to install 0 HOLD, subj to thi-aforesaid yr6is'As with ilgrhts: and Ppurt6nilices thd�hUnto'�bel'6ngincj untcrl"'Grantieq, . V, .1 . '.` 'i ')'- - its $ucces h,y.� " n 458 gnll, f Or 'Vhk";' andsora . dj , , '"'. ' i drantor'heraW6ovi�antv with d ap ee t thit laiarrarit and defend the'title to the r said d""tae, 'its'kUacessorx od agiitrns hersihbef ore I forever, AnentIonal agnihmi thd,;Iawful bY:`,, fr' m' or'undar.'Jt.� but� against 16: at,"hs Claims of none IN WITNESS WRtRZOF, Grantor hae'causqd thesp- be *:416nad bj�", its t Irsaident and tented by a "istaseer't nt e ;g an�dti` r corporate ag&l to he `iunto affixek thinti', day o J 4: 1990. -W UPLAND INDUSTRIAL DEVELoptMNr COMPANY By: a at I to. %7 . If a a re Ary 46 R A V? 4 . . . . . . . . ... 14IVV9/ • '' � •C �S� �j"•t ��i' Yv : � �� +�t,'•'.r T�� y=�:r�r.L -' +r :.`�.: r f',. ,� i . ��I �y>Y?i i tq,� ry r t ♦•, • � i, � , "'71r1 .�4 �rJ ri �'.11.U'! i:•. � �-,, 'i'";hli r�_, ,�i; ?": r(f !. 'S .:L\,u•• P' µee 7�1 ,�.,&+f Q,•(:•,'1 : {'al i4�••.��It' r T. �•i-:fir. +i'��Cti ' � 1:..'r., ��. 1 :�; `rI ' J •'' , '''•'' " ;, •-' ! �": . e ' r •'i.:''7y,f, ,�..•;, .-.•'i;op• , rY' �T�,.`'.''• ''= '-t't'�f;'�• ';w'.. '�XFiYHIT A` TO 1 of Page t .rent . I�•:;. "�, t ;!':' •� 2239000969 ' L i'y ftt 71 {�;.�'6Titl'�T•y�•��'�1;,�r•f��,�T�+t•:.•tih, i�!'.it."•'�`I;r., .1•• .. a p .:l�,' r ! Y.n`W , fy :4.M1�' . �'t,'rLy.,1�rQ+� '.+.•, .•, •'.. � •'''" . ; , .. � `. 5 �,., � ' ,;•, •, , of + land being ,Ldta ,1. nB:,,2 ` of, Block 3 and all i l ok� yam•♦; ,. 2'..q�' �' 4'; of. ;Treeaure vallay -Buai'nees 'Center Phase err•♦ Vit'• •1�.. �' 1: l� i lurid v "A-tdnl";inr,. tha',6VEy 'ct H�ridian; Ada County, Idaho, the •iC?i.'iia �l"''reao'sde'd : on Januaiy:;; 2' ',' 1996, in Bonk Si of tb>t' t, 'Pages �4?90 479x",and '4792, 'record9 of said County, , '.. J 1"?. ; �� y'r' r;,.". ?•; • i:. FOR __t q:,t,',.;-nr,e: '90 AUG 31 Ail '152 JOHN .A i. `,. �c ?QEF 1i ol it df its! '�•f v. •?•.+y{ ' , ';'�. ,r•�}. .\ . , ,l' 1 , Y`,I�.�l:'`-•1,�,11.M1t'••r'}y'1,i"�Zr'��. �y- '1•�r'•" r' rl .-_ •'�. l• ^ �i . a •.. .� .. �� ., .. ,I,.L'.•� I -IMP low.— g!"s 4/o, 7� Page it H -F DAUX tl. MQAL, 74 X In ON RE id ppb fUFIiAND INDUSTRIAL DEed an the day. Ila. kn &WEST 'CO p 3w_ '00. �Tne-, to u Ser- to, be! rpos `Cbhgi h e arat On hirsin aXpreasgd, in the executed the same ate' I .,an Act and dead of said i�6iatjon Mr),, SEAL: lay, HA OF O I e F� ICE this --LILL, PAMALA JVUPA'AN PUE; LIC S .9 t a t e tate of Texas My Commc. ' !,BEAL)" 4' SA Stu. AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF 1DAH0 3 sg COUNTY OF ADA) I, P, Q, Rex 2727 ����(na►� (address) Boi so.—Idahobeing first duly sworn upon Q�741 oath. depose and say; (city) (state) 1. That I am the record owner of tho property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to 7 (name) address) to submit the accompanying application portaining to that property. 702 2. 1 agree to indemnify, defend and hold meridian and it's employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any, dispute as to the statements contained herein or at to the ownership of tht: property which is the subject of the application. Dated this let day of , 19::. /Mc. r frignature) SUBSCRIBE SWORN to before me the day and year first above written, a� 0'T Age„ �► 1't►B L1t' 40 Notary Public Residing at My R ff Idaho Commission Expires., n.a� a+oe I R-4 RI R-4 RT-] a RT I RT ' 4* RT RT j RT g --rLr 'Site R RT Y :rf v cY I 1 � I ff RT I-� M-1 C -G u ' RETAIL CCMPLE/ FCR: rAI 4CLARK DEVELOPMENT` UAN •• ..-. tREASI:RE NAL LEY 5i 61NE55 P- El --'-------'--'—^o�^-----'--_---._ RETAIL COMPLEX FOR; gro CL4F,:'< DEVELOFNEENT DOME 1"o um 31 FAX 336 (XV 136-M m E !t'- 16, rgh Li El --'-------'--'—^o�^-----'--_---._ RETAIL COMPLEX FOR; gro CL4F,:'< DEVELOFNEENT DOME 1"o um 31 FAX 336 (XV 136-M m E !t'- del-.III,� CkMq%M FM MLJWMAL � � CLARK D�vELOPMENt Ujji;v� M 1 I 1 1 I I } I 1 l t 1 I 1 I 1 � t 1 ; I _ + 1 1 1 1 1 t t I L--- 1 1 1 ' 1 ' I ' ' 1 I 1 ' ' 1 1 ' ' 1 1 1 1 1 ' t 1 I 1 ' 1 t V W 1 ' I � ' I 1 ' 1 1 ' ' 1 ^ ------------------------- 1 i t 1 I 1 I i I 1 I ' , , 1 1 1 � t I , , I , a 101 v� CLARK OF-VELOPMEN7 aRcrnr�ss URI -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - URI 10 Eli ------------ URI I A A, %- X\ A, URI ,:" 4 -� O x P o ' � .. {�� -. ♦ ^ z a 2 � y 4 bRs a � o . o P o O � n O 4 :. $': - .. - �:.� �: , as FEB -03-1999 10:22 ARCHITECTS US ArMiftu. A!A 1087 War Xwr Strft4 Suite 160 Boiee, Malmo 83702 Tikphonc 206 64370 LVU 806 JX61730 l -I -UM LL -AKN UCV=LUY'MCIV1 Li/JO LbL/ ham. 5 BRS ARCHITECTS 206 336 8330 P-03/13 city of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Attn: Shari stiles Dear Ms. Stiles: Re: Clark Development Treasure valley Bus. Park BRS Project No. 98196 The. applicant, Clark Development, understands and agrees to pay any additional sewer, water or trash fees as required. Further, the applicant verities that the information contained herein is true and correct and will post, on the property,. proper public. noticing one week before the scheduled hearing. CLARK DEVELOPMENT William Clara wC:cw FEB 04 '99 09:36 208 342 2627 PRGE.03 -4da Count Sherry R. Huber, President Judy Peavey -Derr, Vice President Marlyss Meyer Routson, Secretary Dave Bivens, Commissioner Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner TO: Clark Development 479 Main Street Boise, ID 83702 . 4Cu�a WrCd East 37th Street Gar 1RWB'vED Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Phone (208) 387-6100 Fax (208) 387-6391 APR 0 5 1999 e-mail: tellus achd.ada.id.us -_T A �, April 1, 1999 FROM: Steve Arnold, Senior Analyst Planning & Development Divisio SUBJECT: MCUP99-003 s/w crnr Eagle Rd/ Fairview ulti building commercial/office Your application for the above referenced project was acted on by the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District on March 24, 1999. The attached staff report lists conditions of approval and street improvements which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 387-6170. SA cc: Plan&Dev Svcs-chron/file John Edney Chuck Rinaldi City -of Meridian BRS Architects - G ADXCOUNTY'� HIGHWAY.NSTRICT I i ' Pla�nning,arTd -Oloprnent:,-Divisibbn.. j___,_DdVblbprnent Application. Report MCU99-0031 ,Treas Business Center's ure Valley Busin SWC Fairview Avenue _& Eagle -Road The applicant is requesting conditional use approval for a 217"600 -square foot office/retail L Shoppind,c4nter. The 14 -acre site is located at the southwest corner., of.Eagle Road and Fairview Ave'nue in Meridian. This development is estimated to generate 4,000 additional vehicle tripsr per dgy- ul3on"full occupbncy based on the lnstl:tdte of Transportation Engineers Trip 06n 't .06n'eration,manua Oh -September 23, 1998, the Commission reviewed and approved MCU -17-98 ; conditional use aPPMV61f6r"a ing center:ori the southeast corh4r of Eagle - of retail sl pp Road and Fairview- Avenue iWMeridian. That development is estimated to generate -26,950- -, A i .4" addition5l Vvehiclettripsper day upon full occupancy. r r Roads im'a6t6d by this development: Eagle Road pa Fairview Avenue Jewell Street Florence Street Olive Avenue -_-�,,o~,�ACHD March 24,1999;,� 7:00,p.m. Commission te A 4 _j LU LE S OR J XSS _GRANGER_..__] LU M CLOVER -E _j OkDOW 1 co 0 LLi, LU. LWILSON C _COMMER CLAL-- LANARK --SITE .............._._FRANKLIN. -._ 0, SUNNYDALE Ux j 7 FTVW)()D "Jt 4" r—IL (ECUTIVE — 0 "Jt 4" r—IL (ECUTIVE RT -4 I L. R1 , RT-----_— RT \ ,� I I ,! a RT RT� 7J Y I 1 1 9,99 —O L' b y� RT RT CG R1 RT c RT RI ,ite RT i I—L RT ,� L I � RT F—G .ATL ------ w Q z Ulw U- I c�� J �I IL4M7rTTV, E— ...---o x+ -d ssaHlsne :a��c� 3a�scaal LN3Wc1O'1aAaC1 0 NW� r � r F 4 F y E x Q'o'Oz! 3-7vv3 a M •U � m � �I r-�1 r s gg P� 1_o y_i Y Ug y• =rc G��" a.0 �F zr. c i W<,9 i— r Facts 'and -Findings:),[,:)-,,a t,,,,,, 'j, D,,l L apf 4zl- A. Geriera11,11riforhiatibn`—i t-, 0 22 eet 4 Gbriefal Data, vn wl_ ly Applicant -"ClarkDevelo'pffient X, -i' H - 4-1 ti�jh Y4, -AeLL Existing Zoning 14, .7 217,600 Total square feet of proposed building C 0 i"'I"', `-`Squarb,feet bfi existing bUlding, t 145 irkj7 1'-Traffid Analysis (TAZ %lvl_'�, 1PIT � 41, i - J� 6 14 1% 0 1 West.Ada,r, .I t ' Impact F6& Benefit Zone t 'r1 , � - a 4,Vestern-jCities-tpt�nt:.^ ,ImpacfFEFWAs-s &S ffi t-15isTricp r", -v 9voIC nibov2;-,�t�t,-'-Effected,Strebts,q---'—I . �', v,--, , -, IT.' � ^1 � 1 7Tv_xr-:IV , " -;4(: - f Eagle R 6d (State Highway 55 I t " Pri6cipal'arterial' t c t4 r* al t 1 -,, txf` . !3-I'MC 3 InefrT�raffic,-c6unt-271-564k!6'n--10/97'rpi§5'k-l�6jr ounton-9/8/98,=.2801,�vphs/OF;ai�-�ieWAVenuer- bi,il4,0-feet-exi!�tiffg�rigfit:oflway'(10-,fjetif" hlg)c trsojlqqG mlt bm; Jrjnmtisq,,BI(1 I rom section Ain Jj'`"'W"'a, ,hn etn-MIIUPIC�jo j46to,226� et,df�ribhtzof4ay,required form (73 toy center l in e), I if 3 Eagle Road is improved with 78 -feet ofpavement, with 5 -travel lanes, and no,.curb,.gutter' or sidewalks,Eagie�'R6adis'Stbt6H'i'ghW5'55-'dn8"s u n d e r Ah ej u ri s d i 6tio n of th41daho -t', Transportation Department ITD A l "a riluce tett r h b "i I Vve"Y OV Fairview A /enup.ltt, thl- C"vC, -PC r Principal arterial rt% s. jj,,oTjCaffic`c7bUn,t, 21,1900 -'ak, H(5Ur`IC_ 'n'ft, &�OM� -k;,#/ "t C-. pe ou 2026 vph e/o Eagle Road A t 720-feet'of, frontage V,� 100:to-.108'-feet'existihg'rightzof-way (50 to 54 _f6et from section -lin6)'- 66'_f44t jT'WC'-W1 Irl 14 410 tl-2O't6,132-'fb6t.FeqUir'ed�right.:�df-'�va'�y-(66, i8l rom, sectionline)' bi. tic JO Fairview -AveKue is'improved with 68 -feet of pavement with 5 -travel �'6nes with no "cu,rtb`Ior! I` _i.jgutter1A7detadNBdsidewalk-Wa-sdohstrOced when 'thissbbdivision,was originally dvrope d. ;'jr or wv01 y a L o c a I --'c o m n e r c i i I t—s t -r6 -6t with -no - b i k -6 la he designation `l 1 c .-d dl- NoW6ffic c�ou6f`available 'D, 360-feet"Offeorite(ge -,i" b,,60-!f6e,t'existihgrrightzo-f-�0(30'-f'6"e-t.'ff6rb-be'n't-�erl-ine)�gfc of pi ntz iq Is hixo Noladditional ri6ht:&-Wa-� uco�i -196=3 10 Invi JOU'l-O" v Is. iqqs required q '�:W'-KJ V , 3A.'i 1 $4, cirlj Florence"SfV6ehs:c` 6't --A 1-A pri n',vr;�Ab ?�r!T. v,:) Ibb �d 0 s rOct0d,,as Nib 24:f(5ot;roadwa`yss�bparated by a 141 -foot med'ian island. 'Y'h6§-`cidrba-hd b-uJtt6`r-5`j" 9 if,, ,3f-Trhe,roa wa u no �7hjs" r`d'q"d�w""a`yj`s` t' " 1 '(1 - ' ' " ' eg� ent,washplatted and! - "as-part?o-f��'t--h-le',Tr-e-a-'su;r-e"tV' B -O's P_ a yrconst�uctE�dr, iness Center tohf3 2i ;i-1roIqqz erfz is %i"', �b C1 i rl I o P C P�,� U Jeyvell.Strt�etld ye m yrw;ovi�,b of Local commercial street with no bike lane designation MCU99003.CMM Page, 2 I Traffic count not available 3607feet of frontage 60 -feet of existing right-of-way No additional right-of-way required M Jewell Street is improved, with, a, 457foot street section with curbs and gutters but ho sidewalks. Local commercial street with no bike lane designation Traffic count not available 800 -feet of frontage 60 -feet of, right-of-way (30 -feet from centerline) No additional right-of-way required Olive Avenue is improved with a 45 -foot street section with curbs and gutters but no sidewalk. B. Utility street cuts in new pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved'in writing, by the District., Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. . C. Eagle Road (State Highway 55) is under the_ jurisdiction of'Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). Application materials should be submitted to ITD for review and requirements of that Department and the applicant should submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of -the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The applicant may contact District III Traffic' Engineer Walter Burnside at 334-8340. D. The applicant is proposing the:following:driveways on the'local/commercial streets: a 30,to 36 -foot wide driveway..on Olive Avenue located approximately' 145 -feet south of Florence Street. • a 30 to 36 -foot wide driveway on Olive Avenue, located approximately 160 -feet north of Florence Street. • a 30 to 36 -foot wide driveway on,Jewell Street, located approximately 30 -feet east of the west property line. District policy requires that all the proposed `driveways be located a minimum of 150 -feet from Eagle Road, 50 -feet from the Florence-Street/Olive Avenue intersection;` and `separatedor aligned 50 -feet from existing driveways. The proposed driveways meet District policy. The applicant should be required to install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign -at the driveway's intersection with the public roads. E. The applicant is proposing to construct a curb return driveway on Fairview Avenue, located approximately 440 -feet west of Eagle Road. District policy requires that the driveway be located a minimum of 440 -feet from Eagle Road for full access. The driveway meets current District policy. The driveway on Fairview Avenue may be constructed as a full access, at this time, with -a,width limited to 404eet. The minimum storage Jength should be 100 -feet. The applicant should be required to install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign' at the driveway's intersection with Fairview Avenue. The applicant is cautioned that the District may restrict usage of this driveway in the future to right turns only or the driveway may be closed. MCU99003.CMM Page 3 F, on The.applicant is'proposing*tol6onstructia curb' (etur`n'driveway�'on'Eagle Roa(Z located . i approximately 440 -feet south of.Fair"view,Avenue District policy r`equi`res a minimum of 440- .. --....... . M feet of separation between the- proposed.hi driveway and Fairview Avenue for a,full access jo, riyewayand°220-feet`,from: Fibre nce-Street The•proposeddriveway meets current'District _0 tpolicyr The driveway,width:"should be=limited to 40 feet.- The minimum storage length should ,j) -;a be 100-feetiand the,applicarit'should be,xequired totinstall a 36"'by36" high�intensity'STOP ,r e} , rsign at the driveway,'s intersection with"Eagle Roads=this driveway will be'restricted to`right- o g y closed.The applicant should be required to right- in/right-out movement in the future and eventual) � constr,uct'a:deceleration.larie,andaaper for the driveway ` ,e Ic-t�.o1' OFIO'* ,., 3at. �' .�v�� ��aogr��c: silt nirlu lokb.-f. , # a "— �a d ° G. ,,Eagle Road- traffic,volumes have<iricreased1a—u4 .^a erage of 16 /o ;w(vpaover the' last'seven years. - Traffic has increased=an average off20 /o over`tFSe last four-�years `The.APA model assumes a 4% annual growth;rate until+the?Year=201'5 Whileit is unlikely that the"20% growth rate will be ¢ maintained; "the APA_forecasVis`li(ely.lowrfjase`d on°observed development rgies and counts. H. ACHD.contracted with EARTH -TECH Engineering Inc. to perform a thi rd party `review of the bs+);bdevelopmentat the southda'st'corner,of Fairview Avenue and'-PEagIe- Road: This second consultant's review produced a less optimistic view of the future traffic volumes on Eagle Road. They were less comfortable with APA's forecasfof 4% ann-ual growth and used recent 1;U %F; etraffic yolumes•to<forecast higher<future volumesbn-Eagle}Road) The result of.this - -assumptonzis that,the^roadway intersections will5be=completely.overwhelmed with traffic from sodivlYl xo\,�vthisproject;and.the,,backgraffom '3 �b r -m` x.:! ri, �t - _�we� r .; ,Wil � 0 -err h rr.3 ~ [s I.�,The,preceding'analyses identified the"following public street improvements needed to A�r�a,ccommodaterthe-additional raffie�creafed bythis project and the normal growth of � �� background traffic: r tZ E. �_w �....ttir' � ri; (r.,,s-'. t.•�p_... w.%..•..t«? t..«,• ,i •s.ti,.•. ;-! 1. •. Construct deceleration, •lanes`at all`inter`sections,onyEagle Road abutting the site. evt 2:} air, _Construct curb; gutter.and "an eastbound lane to Fairview Avenue• from 'a -point 500 -feet ; ?,.west of -Eagle Road.to the eastern boundary ofthesite STI e District would compensate the -developer for the costs' of this construction from available impact�fee b o*7reveniie available'in`this`beriefitzone�- 41crrjA ' �:�r���� �'�'�'-�'-'. '' �' -�fit . v:b airview,Avenue is`an ACHD'classified"roadwayand; as`such, would be`°eligible for -the use of impact fee. revenue-,to,increa''s`e'their'capacity,' if such`improvement~isiincluded in the' Capital aaeo, Improvernents4P.,lan (GIP.) andthe"Five'Year Wor`k'Program (FYV1/P). 'ldah'o Code also allows theluse of; road ,impact fee'reyenue,on state highway '4such as Eagle Road' for"`capacity ' ' enhancement. ,Someaim rovements'=will Elie necessaryin the future'to accommodate traffic p growth without.the traffic that will be generated by proposed developments at/near this�,�_ .b �intersection,'and the District would be coristrucfing `those improvements at the "appropriate time,<partially,..funded:fromnimpact':fee revenue - The volume that will'be`generated by the proposed development accelerates -the` need=for thoselmprovements '`Staff Lias evaluated the relativebenefits;that";will1be`realized''by tFSe'gQn�eral`traveling public'Ifrom the various byrrecommended improvements and `suggests`tliat«they be considered in two'catego'ries, system arimprov..ements and;site`'relif`6`6impr'ovements as�follows: c' �`_1 , ° ', ��.�Y ) i t- 1111 ii)i ....7,P.' du":€ -:, r rR:'.J . u 'C # _•.. ' `" R r% f, trill' 3` s'i 'ar_,i- -1_ tr ! c r....� n w �.,..-r . }.r+'1 �A . J J . :�rl +t`S�a €"., . P C '-)t 1 jzri,n `System Improvements Hp—_ '-)t than'ta site=related improvement d r wh ch is'.a:'publicafacility a`nd'is`ldesigned-to provide service tothe-c`ommunity at large. The costs of.these improverne"nts-would'be offset fr'orri the Road Impacf<Fees for the project .` tFt{ie-r rs i ;+*tC' .` fi r�,,.i es�'�''"4 i7'c['Cn1^at'P*y ,.$ t �*•ri�ts�lr sg� �c�"1iFs.-'�"',ii� t $� r r N� �. �, +... ._ a• „ l t t": r#' {. '4,�, tr..r«� MCU99003.CMM :c"l ,a, , ;*'Page 4 a. Construct curb, gutter and an eastbound lane from 500-feet west (the end of existing. improvements) of the Eagle, Road intersection to the Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection. b. Dedicate sufficient additional right-of-way to total 66-feet from centerline of Fairview Avenue from the intersection with Eagle Road for a distance of 650- feet west of the intersection, then taper to 60-feet from centerline in 200-feet, V and continue 60-feet of right-of-way to the west boundary: of. the, development. 2. ' Site-related improvements are capital improvements or.right-of way. dedication for direct access to and/or. within the proposed project or development., The costs of these_ .,improvements must be borne by the developer,of the project: a. Construct a 5400t sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the site. b. Construct a 5-foot sidewalk on Olive Avenue abutting the site. C. Construct a 5-foot sidewalk on. Florence • Street abutting the site. d. Construct a 5-f6ot sidewalk on ~Jewell Street abutting the site. K. Evaluation of the.traffic analysis summary and supplemental field analysis by staff provided the following information: , 1. The proposed project is estimated'�to generate 4,000 total daily vehicle trips_ The actual increase in traffic volume to the street system is approximately 3,000 daily vehicle trips. Approximately 1;000 daily pass-by trips are already on the adjacent roadways. 2. The proposed project is estimated to generate 400 total peak hour vehicle trips. Approximately 100 peak hour pass-by, trips are already on the adjacent roadways. 3. The anticipated 400 peak hour.vehicle trips-are the result of a trip rate of 3.03 peak hour vehicle trips per 1,000.square feet of floor area. 4. The project site was originally reviewed as a light industrial center subdivision in 1985 -,,as part of the Treasure,Valley,Business Center= _ 5 The.submitted site plan shows-one.driveway on Jewell Street; two driveways on Olive Avenue,. one.drivewayon Eagle Road and one driveway. on Fairview Avenue. 6 Jewell Street is,a:focal/commercial road. .: 7. ' Florence Street is'a local/commercial street. The Florence Street/Eagle Road intersection is STOP controlled on Florence Street. 8. The applicant is not proposing to construct a driveway onto the roadway.- The roadway has a center landscaped median from EagleRoad to Olive Avenue. 9. EagleRoadis an access controlled roadway under the jurisdiction of ITD. One access point was deeded to this parcel by ITD. The applicant is proposing to utilize that access point. Florence Street is the only access to Eagle Road that has been constructed at this time. 1.0. ..- Hickory--Avenue: is a. Collector street from Fairview Avenue�to Jewell Street which will provide access from this site to Fairview Avenue. The Hickory Avenue/Fairview Avenue intersection, will be signal controlled in the future. 11. In addition to Hickory,Avenue, there is one other proposed driveway on Fairview Avenue. The driveway is proposed for'full access at this time and meets the required 440-feet of separation between the Fairview Avenue/Eagle Road intersection. The driveway should have a minimum of 100-feet of stacking for both the inbound and outbound. traffic lanes. This access point would be restricted to right-in/right-out operation as Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue traffic volumes increase and would be eliminated entirely in future stages, of the plan's implementation for Eagle ,,:.Road/Fairview Avenue intersection, ti ,12. Both .Eagle, Road and .Fairv,iew Avenue_are ..principal, arterials. „As; such, Level of. Service,(LOS)'E is an acceptable condition for the intersections on both roadways. MCU99003.CMM Page 5 13. Both Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue are five lane facilities abutting the project site with free right -turn lanes on all legs of the intersection. 14. The Eagle Road Access Study (1997) recommends allowing only one interim access point to Eagle Road between Florence Street and Fairview Avenue. This access point would be restricted to right-in/right-out operation as Eagle Road traffic volumes = increase and would be eliminated 'entirely in future stages of the plan's implementation for Eagle`-Rdb& _.: 15. The Eagle Road Access Study recommended a future grade separated, interchange for the-Eagle/Fairview intersection: 16.- The current APA model assumes an average annual increase of traffic on Eagle Road of 4%. The observed traffic increases have average d20%o per year over.the last four years. 17. The Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection currently operates at LOS D 18. The Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection will operate at LOS F with the existing geometry and the°"existing plus project" traffic volumes. The intersection can be made to operate at an acceptable LOS E condition with the provisions of dual left turn lanes and free right turn lanes on all approaches. This change will require moving at least two signal poles and adding pavement as well as re -striping. The signals currently provide pedestrian actuated movement across Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road, and this provision -for pedestrians must be maintained after any modifications to the intersection: 19. The Eagle Road/Florence Street intersection will operate at LOS C with the "existing plus project" traffic volumes. 20. The Fairview Avenue/Hickory Avenue intersection will operate at LOS C with the "existing plus project traffic volumes." The intersection will require signalization on all approaches in order to maintain an adequate LOS.: The traffic signal will be constructed by the District when needed. 21. Both driveways on Eagle Road and Fairview.AVdnu-64ill be fulf access site driveways initially, but will'operate similar to right-in/right.out facilitiesbecause the through traffic Volumes on'both'streets-are so high -that there will be`few opportunities for left -turns at any of the non -signalized driveways: These drive wayswill operate at anacceptable LOS E or better for outbound left turns and inbound left turns. The'demand for left turns at the driveway intersections far exceeds the available capacity. These intersections only function acceptably because the excess traffic can be diverted to a signalized intersection at Fairview Avenue and Hickory Avenue. This condition is caused by a combination of high traffic volumes on the arterial streets and at the site driveways. 22. Due'to the high traffic volumes on both Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue, the remaining, unsignalized, full access site driveways will operate at an acceptable LOS E or better' for outbound right turns and inbound left turns if the'signalized intersections are constructed as shown above. L. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that,tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson ,at 387-6160 for further information. M. In order to'reduce trips to -and from this development, it is recommended'that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization •(TMO) that is formed with a'boundary thatinclu'des this'site or is adjacent to this development; MCU99003.CMM Page 6 A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and privateandpublic transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, car pools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An`annual survey'will be'required'of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office: N. District policy states that direct access "to arterials and collectors is normally restricted "and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement for the parcel to the `west to use this parcel for access to the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit - (or other required permits). The District intends to require a similar agreement of the owners of the parcel to the west if they are the subject of a future development application. O. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be,placed on future development of this parcel. P. The District completed an access control plan for the entire Eagle Road corridor in 1997. An important recommendation of that study was the proposal for a grade separated interchange at the Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection. Although construction of the interchange is anticipated beyond the 20 -year planning period, the Long Range Transportation Plan establishes the policy that the District should preserve the right-of-way now to ensure that the needed land will be available when construction begins.• Therefore, the applicant should be ,required to dedicate or otherwise agree to not encumber sufficient land area to accommodate the. proposed interchange design -.,The owner -will be compensated for all additional right-of- way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the'owne'r submits 'a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section _15 of:ACHD Ordinance #1'88.'.If the landmis dedicated, thetowner-may enter into' a ;license agreement with the District to use the, preserved right-of=way until the'District constructs the interchange: - if another form of preservation is approved by the Commission, the developer and the District should enter into an agreement providing for the use of the right-of-way. for the interchange. Q. The existing transportation system will be adequate to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development only with the additional requirements outlined within this report. The existing transportation system is not adequate for the anticipated traffic volumes without improvement. Recommendations: Special Recommendations to Meridian City: 1. In order to reduce. trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building consider formation of an Alternative Transportation Program. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For. more information contact Mrs. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed !. building(s) are,urged.,to participate in -any: Transportation: ManagementAssociation (TMA) or ;:Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that -is formed with a boundary that -includes MCU99003.CMM Page 7 this site or is,adjacent to this development:gTh- District'would.''appreciatelthe,f6rmation of } o -1 such an entity by,this complex. �+ <a.R alt ° x� s?4� � ;{� � �F � �{�,'�.vrt..�{ tt r,, .`�'r+` l r ^t -{Jti i t}' °{Ewe d 4'? 'I }ja •j l;FTI A,+ i r a > Special Recommendation,to ITD':.,,3- i. n, `'�'r ► f� =� � '� _ frt : t :!s 3 { .aL+: ,_VZ -,: vu, 1 IjZ, %l,g�ii,#f; 1. The applicant driveway should be.required to construct a deceleration. aper.at Florence Street and the y on Eagle Road r A, yam'-R_s {}'..7 {d n f y.F•:, w'� .,..yM. .t,>;'\ 't)T ' Ot.s1*�\A The'following Trequire;inents=are provided'as,conditions for; approval• .: r . . Site Speeific�Re "' irements- u IAr°s3 �1�k f rift � C y 1" d ' • ' a J .-'`� t i•t � +t 1. Comply with requirements'of,ITDJ& Eagle.Road (State Highway.55) frontage:-Submit,tothe - ui,.,. $,., ..# jzDistr'ict a letter from'ITD, regardingksaid reYquirements prior to`District-approval.of- h"e-" i' pint of.issuance°of a building permit (or other required permits),. whichever.occurs.first.,Contact District III Traffic Engineer Walter Burnside at 334-8340. ;[ ��"r+r vrl�s:c..;.e . - f-.'*'s"`'X,�r r ,": i:{.t..: :.. } y\aJ.-• k- r r+S'a, #�• t.'l4 v.tr4 i`•. �°'}:, ;l l i'. 2. Dedicate sufficient right=of=way abutting Eagle Road for the future Eagle Road. Interchange. + Cob rdiriate `thie'right=of-way`req uirementstwith District staff.•'The,right-of-way is,generally described as being a minimum of 226 -feet wide (113 -feet west of centerline) from Fairview $ ,Avenue south1or 600 -feet. ~ The right-of-way needsto th;enataper to 146feet\widei{73-feet ��r j 4#rom.centerline) to `a point "1,400 feet south,of. Fairview. Avenue. -The owner wiIlFbe .{ Yta Ra:`ak.Jr\ .,t' "d"' r+ f yA aC• "i 1"a - � .; z' " -' it {. .,;,, f >......-,. compensated for all ngit=of=way•dedicated as an additioan to,existing.right-of,way,from,;i '�r;'available.impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application pact fee e administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section,15 of , , A o the impact #188. It-:is.understood that ITD will reimburse'the-Disir'O for'th ACRD e e'cost" of this right -of way;acquisition. .,rya -r Al '7717".11 7•5}. 3 j�l,, Dedicate. sufficient right --of way'abutting Fairview Avenue for the future Eagle Road ry, interchange: Coordinate'the i fight "of -`Way re'q`uir`ements��with District staff The'right -ofMv ay,is 1t generally described 'as being a'minimum of'176-feet wide (8 1466 t south of center"line) from ref ee } '#tip h°JEagle:Road'west f6r'500-feet;`then'tapering`t6r120 feet (60'fr6m centerline) at j',000"feet west of Eagle Road. The owner'will`be'`compensafed for all right-of-way tletlicafed as`a'n addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this -benefit z`on'e,`if the'own'er submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator}prior to breaking ground, in n o{ accordance with Section. 15 of'ACHD"Or'dinancea#188 " 'Alt- r,A4 ¢^�" ,�° . r ``s �a ,!. ..� a,� {� f � #3. � � ? ".,� t�?t�i�i�t' r)1j"Vbjq jnfl Ob 4. °'Construct'a' 5 -foot wide sidewal(on Fairview Avenue abutting the site prior to issuance of any Certificate'of Occupancy.• The,b6n'structi6h,' lahs forth- development showing the sidewalk must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. ` t ` 1.1-`� �;... ry ,�, ,... r•v a hf`.i.•.7 .may '!''- A 1 i�-^�i}' 5. nciConstruct'aYcurb"`retu`rn'drive'way�on"Fairview Avenue in the proposed location The driveway arif'shall be located'as`proposed ori the site'pIan dated`1%7%98,°prepared''by BRSfArci itects'and 'on,file;with;the District)approximatelys 440=feet west#of'yEagle rRoad'.` Thud iivewayj.on' Fairview l�Avenue.is,to.be'constructed as a full acc"es"s driGeway`with'a width limited to 40 feei'--T h Jacir,minirhum.8t6ragb length'shall be 100=feet.''Install a 36"�by 36' high inten'sity,STOP•si1 `n at !!�rtfIthe�-driveway's.'intersectiori with Fairview'Avenue' The'applicantis'cautiordd that'the'District b:�it`inay-restrict usage -of this driveway m tlie'future`to nght=tu'rns:only or'tfie`driveway maybe Closed.'"1 . - xi. � ^`7 ^'i.3 0,011- Y� _ ' _ratJ � - t -.. # ._ 6 a \ '' � , ent'for the parcel to'the west tot�use this parcel for ,Provide a recorded`cross-acces s easem „�caccessto the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit (or.other�required per'mits). tt ' —•^'' MCU99003.CMM Page 8 7. Construct a curb return driveway on Eagle Road, located as proposed 440 -feet south of Fairview Avenue as a full access driveway. The driveway width should be limited -to 40 -feet. The minimum storage length should be 100 -feet. Install a 36" by 36" high' intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Eagle Road.,. This driveway_will be restricted to right- in/right-out movement in the future and eventually closed. Construct a deceleration lane and taper for -the driveway:_, s 8. The applicant shall be required to construct sidewalks abutting the site on Florence Street, Olive -Avenue, and Jewell: Street., Coordinate the location>of4he.sidewalks with'District.staff. 9. Other than the access point specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel „ access to Fairview Avenue is prohibited.. 10. Construct a 30 to 36 -foot wide driveway on Olive Avenue, located approximately 145 -feet south of Florence Street. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveways intersection with Records Drive. 11._, _.;,Construct a.30.to 36 foot,wide driveway,on-,Olive Avenue,- Iodated. approximately 160 -feet north of Florence Street. Installa 36" by 36" 'high, intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Records Drive. 12. Construct a 30 to 3646ot wide driveway on Jewell Street, located approximately 30 -feet east of the west property line. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Records Drive. Standard. Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of:any requirement orpolicy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The reaues for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report totheCommission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted,,on'by the Commission unless removed from. the agenda by the •Commission. w 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning. and Development Supervisor within two weeks of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00., The reauest for reconsideration shall data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision The request for. reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #188, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. MCU99003.CMM Page 9 J 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District {=° Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services :�z procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless` specifically waived herein. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of buildingpermit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. - 6. Construction, userand property, development shall be' in conformance With all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 8. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall;require:the applicant"to comply With: all rules;. regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: 1. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development'will not -place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the Vicinity, impacted by. the proposed development.,. Should you have any questions"or.comments, please- contact the Planning and Development Division at 38776170. Submitted by: Date of Commission Action: MCU99003.CMM Page 10 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report MCU99-003 Meridian Family Center SWC Fairview Avenue & Eagle Road The applicant is requesting conditional use approval for a 217,600 -square feet of office/ retail shopping center. The 14 -acre site is located on the southwest corner of Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue in Meridian. This development is estimated to generate 4,000 additional .— vehicle trips per day upon full occupancy based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. On September 23, 1998, the Commission reviewed and approved MCU -17-98, conditional use approval for an 848,000 -square foot retail shopping center. That site is 74.74 -acres and located on the southeast corner of Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue in Meridian. The +� development is estimated to generate 26,950 -additional vehicle trips per day upon full C� occupancy based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual and the submitted traffic study. 619,868 -square feet are proposed to be developed in the first phase of the project. Roads impacted by this development: Eagle Road Fairview Avenue Jewell Street Florence Street -- Olive Avenue ACHD Commission Date - March 24 1999 - 7:00 p.m. I FRANKLIN SPRINGWOOD AUTUMN •--� , LESLIE O -�- —O w _- MEADOWGRASS _GRANGER_._._ LU CD; > p - -- w CLOVER MEADOWS N -- __ Q _....� __.._ .- W CT 0 _ SITE _ - -- ---- FAIRVIEW ^� WILSON f JEW Q� C) p ctQ U A � FRANKLIN SPRINGWOOD AUTUMN R-4 L -O' .r RT ite K 1 _ z T I -L I ; RT T T* ImI � ( � �RT--- .N 9O�A� '(919 f1Wp ,9 RT W.7. GG 'FrIG lNM4clO-lSAaCl >P--iV'10 � =V�re' I �Tll I I 1111 Ml u 1,14 C— - Dill I -;L MMC -4 w co z V) z co Ow —Z) ---:--J G WNSAT WYIO,�) > E— —Z) ---:--J G WNSAT WYIO,�) Facts and Findings: A. General Information General Data Owner - L+�—+ Applicant -Clark Development I -L - Existing zoning -�� I -L - Requested zoning 74.74 - Acres 0 - Proposed dwelling units 217,600 - Total square feet of proposed building 0 - Square feet of existing building 145 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) C� West Ada - Impact Fee Benefit Zone Western Cities - Impact Fee Assessment District 2. Effected Streets Eagle Road-Ostate Highway 55) Principal arterial Traffic count 27,564 on 10/97, peak hour count on 9/8/98 = 2801 vph s/o Fairview Avenue 1,390 -feet of frontage Cl= 140 -feet existing right-of-way (70 -feet from section line) --� Comply with ITD requirements Eagle Road is improved with a 78 feet of pavement with five travel lanes and no curb, gutter or sidewalk. Eagle Road is State Highway 55 and is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) +� Fairview Avenue Principal arterial '--� Traffic count 21,900 on 10/97, peak hour count on 9/8/98 = 2026 vph e/o Eagle Road ^T� 720 -feet of frontage 100 to 108 -feet existing right-of-way (50 to 54 -feet from section line) 120 to 132 -feet required right-of-way (60 to 66 -feet from section line) Fairview Avenue is improved with a 68 feet of pavement with five travel lanes and no curb, gutter or sidewalk. Florence Street T - Local commercial street with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 360 -feet of frontage 60 -feet existing right-of-way (30 -feet from centerline) No additional right-of-way required Florence Street is constructed as two 24 -foot roadways separated by a 14 -foot median island. The roadway has curb and gutter but no sidewalks. This roadway segment was platted and constructed as part of the Treasure Valley Business Center. MCU99003.CMM Page 2 Jewell Strept Local commercial street with no bike lane designation Traffic count not available 360 -feet of frontage 60 -feet of existing right-of-way No additional right-of-way required C= Jewell Street is improved with a 45 -foot street section with curbs and gutters but no sidewalks. Olive Avenue Local commercial street with no bike lane designation Traffic count not available 800 -feet of frontage 60 -feet of right-of-way (30 -feet from centerline) No additional right-of-way required � Olive Avenue is improved with a 45 -foot street section with curbs and gutters but no sidewalks. B. Utility street cuts in new pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. C. Eagle Road (State Highway 55) is under the jurisdiction of Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). Application materials should be submitted to ITD for review and requirements of that clz:� Department and the applicant should submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said ^� requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The applicant may contact District III Traffic Engineer Lance Johnson at 334-8340. D. Eagle Road traffic volumes have increased an average of 16% over the last seven years. Traffic has increased an average of 20% over the last four years. The APA model assumes a 4� 4% annual growth rate until the Year 2015. While it is unlikely that the 20% growth rate will be CIZ= maintained, the APA forecast is likely low, based on observed development rates and counts. --�' E. Evaluation of the traffic analysis summary and supplemental field analysis by staff provided the following information: 1. The proposed project is estimated to generate 4,000 total daily vehicle trips. The actual additional traffic volume added to the street system is approximately 3,000 daily vehicle trips because of passby trips already on the adjacent roadways. L-4=4 2. The proposed project is estimated to generate 400 total peak hour vehicle trips., adding approximately 1,750 to 2,020 peak hour vehicle trips to the external trip network because of passby trips already on the adjacent roadways. 3. The anticipated 400 peak hour vehicle trips are the result a trip rate of 3.03 peak hour vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet of floor area. This number is in compliance with the data provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). District staff completed peak hour traffic counts at two smaller local shopping centers. The observed numbers matched the ITE data for a similar sized shopping center. Staff therefore accepts the submitted figures for peak hour trip generation. 4. The project site was originally reviewed as a light industrial center subdivision in 1985 as part of the Treasure Valley Buisness Center. MCU99003.CMM Page 3 5. The submitted site plan shows several driveways on Jewell Street, Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue. 6. Jewell Street is local/commercial road. 7. Florence Street is a public street and designated as a local road. Florence/Eagle intersection is STOP controlled on the Florence Street. 8. Florence Street is a local/commercial public street west of Eagle Road. The applicant is not proposing to construct a driveway onto the roadway. The roadway has a center c landscaped median from Eagle Road to Olive Avenue. 9. Eagle Road is an access controlled roadway under the jurisdiction of ITD. One access point was deeded to this parcel by ITD. The applicant is proposing two access points (including Florence Street). Florence Street is the only access point that has been constructed at this time. 10. Hichory Avenue is a public street from Fairview Avenue that connects to Jewell Street which will provide access from this site to Fairveiw Avenue. Hickory Avenue and Jewell Street are designated as a local commercial roads. Hickory Avenue/Fairview Avenue intersection will be signal controlled in'the future. —+--� = 11. In addition to Hickory Avenue, there is one other proposed driveway on Fairview .C�=� Avenue. The driveway is proposed for full access at this time and meets the required 440 -feet of separation between the Fairview Avenue/Eagle Road intersection. The driveway should have a minimu of 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and outbound traffic lanes. This access point would be restricted to right-in/right-out operation as Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue traffic volumes increase and would be eliminated entirely in future stages of the plan's implementation for Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection. 12. Both Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue are principal arterials. As such, Level of C� Service (LOS) E is an acceptable condition for the intersections on both roadways. 13. Both Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue are five lane facilities abutting the project site with free right -turn lanes on all legs of the intersection. 14. The Eagle Road Access Study (1997) recommends allowing only one access point to Eagle Road between Florence Street and Fairview Avenue. This access point would be restricted to right-in/right-out operation as Eagle Road traffic volumes increase and would be eliminated entirely in future stages of the plan's implementation for Eagle Road. 15. The Eagle Road Access Study recommended a future grade separated interchange for the Eagle/Fairview intersection. 16. The current APA model assumes an average annual increase of traffic on Eagle Road of 4%. The observed traffic increases have averaged 20% per year over the last four years. 1 17. The Eagle/Fairview intersection currently operates at LOS D. 18. The Eagle/Fairview intersection will operate at LOS F with the existing geometry and the "existing plus project" traffic volumes. The intersection can be made to operate at an acceptable LOS E condition with the provisions of dual left turn lanes and free right turn lanes on all approaches. This change will require moving at least two signal poles and adding pavement as well as restriping. The signals currently provide pedestrian actuated movement across Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road, and this provision for pedestrians must be maintained after any modifications to the intersection. 19. The Eagle/Florence Street intersection will operate at LOS C with the `existing plus project" traffic volumes. 20. The Fairview/Hickory Avenue intersection will operate at LOS C with the existing plus project traffic volumes. The intersection will require signalization on all approaches in order to maintain a good LOS. The traffic signal will be constructed by the District when needed. MCU99003.CINIM Paye 4 21. Both driveways on Eagle Raod and Fairview Avenue will be full access site driveways but will operate similar to right-in/right-out facilities becuase the through traffic volumes on both streets are so high that there will be few opportunities for left -turns at any of the non -signalized driveways. These driveways will operate at an acceptable LOS E or better for outbound left turns and inbound left turns. The demand for' left turns at the driveway intersections far exceeds the available capacity. These intersections only function acceptably because the excess traffic can be diverted to a signalized intersections at Fairview Avenue and Hickory Avenue. This condition is caused by a C� combination of high traffic volumes on the arterial streets and at the site driveways. 22. Due to the high traffic volumes on both Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue, the remaining, unsignalized, full access site driveways will operate at an acceptable LOS E or better for outbound right turns and inbound left turns if the signalized intersections are constructed as shown above. F. ACHD contracted with EARTH -TECH Engineering Inc. to perform a third party review of the development at the southeast corner of Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road. This second C� consultant's review produced had a less optimistic view of the future traffic volumes on Eagle Road. They were less comfortable with APA's forecast of 4% annual growth and used recent traffic volumes to forecast higher future volumes on Eagle Road. The result of this assumption is that the roadway intersections will be completely overwhelmed with traffic from this project and the background traffic volumes. G. The preceding analyses identified the following public street improvements needed to accommodate the additional traffic created by this project and the normal growth of background traffic: =---� 1. Construct deceleration lanes at all intersections on Eagle road abutting the site. 2. Construct curb, gutter and an eastbound lane to Fairview from a point 500 -feet west of Eagle Road to the eastern boundary of the site. H. Fairview Avenue is an ACHD classified roadway and, as such, would be eligible for the use of impact fee revenue to increase their capacity, if such improvement is included in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) and the Five Year Work Program (FYWP). Idaho Code also allows �-� the use of road impact fee revenue on State Highways, such as` Eagle Road for capacity enhancement. Only one of the improvements recommended by the traffic impact study, the Eagle/Pine signal, is included in the FYWP. Some of the recommended improvements will be necessary in the future to accommodate traffic growth without the traffic that will be generated by this proposal, and the District would be constructing those improvements at the appropriate time, partially funded from impact fee revenue. The large volume that will be generated by the proposed development accelerates the need for those improvements. Staff has evaluated the relative benefits that will be realized by the general traveling public from the various recommended improvements and suggests that they be considered in two categories, system CIZ= improvements and site related improvements as follows: -� 1. System Improvements are capital improvements other than a site -related improvement which is a public facility and is designed to provide service to the community at large. The costs of these improvements would be offset from the Road Impact Fees for the project: a. Construct dual left turn lanes on the Fairview Avenue legs of the Eagle/Fairview intersection. NICU99003.CMNl Pa,e 5 b. Construct curb, gutter and an eastbound lane from 500 -feet west (the end of existing improvements) of the Eagle Road intersection to the Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue intersection. C. Dedicate sufficient additional right-of-way to total 66 -feet from centerline of Fairview Avenue from the intersection with Eagle Road for a distance of 650 - feet east of the intersection, then taper to 60 -feet from centerline in 200 -feet, and continue 60 -feet of right-of-way to the east boundary of the development. c� 2. -Site -related improvements are capital improvements or right-of-way dedication for direct access to and/or within the proposed project or development. The costs of these improvements must be borne by the developer of the project: a. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Fairview Avenue abutting the site. b. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the site. C. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Olive Avenue abutting the site. d. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Florence Street abutting the site. �+ e. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Jewell Street abutting the site. ff. I. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff has indicated the need for a Park & Ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 -space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. J. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program C:t::-' for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. C� Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. ^� For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160 for further information. K. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. �—� A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, car pools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. a a L. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that rte, the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement for the parcel to the east to use this parcel for access to the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits). The District intends to require a similar agreement of the owners of the parcel to the east if they are the subject of a future development application. M. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be placed on future development of this parcel. MCU99003.CIv1M Pa ,e 6 • N. The District completed an access control plan for the entire Eagle Road corridor in 1997. An important recommendation of that study was the proposal for a grade separated interchange at the Eagle/Fairview intersection. Although construction of the interchange is anticipated beyond the 20 -year planning period, the Long Range Transportation Plan establishes the policy that the District should preserve the right-of-way now to ensure that the needed land will be available when construction begins. Therefore, the applicant should be required to dedicate or otherwise agree to not encumber sufficient land area to accommodate the c proposed interchange design. The owner will be compensated for all additional right-of-way C� from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. If the land is dedicated, the owner may enter into a license agreement with the District to use the preserved right-of-way until the District constructs the interchange. If another form of preservation is approved by the Commission, the developer and the District should enter into an agreement providing for the use of the right-of-way for the interchange. O. The existing transportation system will be adequate to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development only with the additional requirements outlined within this report. The existing transportation system is not adequate for the anticipated traffic volumes without improvement. Recommendations: Special Recommendations to Meridian City: c� r. 1. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building consider formation of an Alternative Transportation Program. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Mrs. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) are urged to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or —+--� Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. The District would a --� such an entity by this complex. appreciate the formation of Special Recommendations to ITD: 1. The applicant should be required to construct a deceleration taper at the driveway on Eagle Road. ZThe following requirements are provided as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: Comply with requirements of ITD for Eagle Road (State Highway 55) frontage. Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Contact District III Traffic Engineer Lance Johnson at 334-8340. MCU99003.CM�t Pa -e 7 2. Dedicate sufficient additional right-of-way to total 66 -feet from centerline of Fairview Avenue from the intersection with Eagle Road for a distance of 650 -feet west of the intersection. The right-of-way should be dedicated by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, C4in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 3. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way abutting Eagle Road for the future Eagle Road Interchange. Coordinate the right-of-way requirements with District staff. The right-of-way is generally described as being a minimum of 226 -feet wide (113 -feet east of centerline) from Fairview Avenue south for 600 -feet. The right-of-way needs then taper to 146 -feet wide (73 -feet from centerline to a point 1,400 -feet south of Fairview Avenue. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance CCS #188. It is understood that ITD will reimburse the District for the cost of this right-of-way acquisition. 4. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way abutting Fairview Avenue for the future Eagle Road interchange. Coordinate the right-of-way requirements with District staff. The right-of-way is generally described as being a minimum of 176 -feet wide (84 -feet south of centerline) from Eagle Road east for 500 -feet, then tapering to 120 -feet (60 from centerline) at 1,000 feet east of Eagle Road. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 5. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Fairview Avenue abutting the site prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. The construction plans for the development showing the sidewalk must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Construct a five-foot sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the site prior to issuance of any --r Certificate of Occupancy. The construction plans for the development showing the sidewalk ^� must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Construct the driveway on Fairview Avenue as proposed. The driveways shall be located as proposed on the site plan dated 1/7/98, prepared by BRS Architects and on file with the District: approximately 440 -feet, west of Eagle Road. The driveway on Fairview Avenue is to be constructed as a full access driveway with a width limited to 40 -feet. The minimum storage length shall be 100 -feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Fairview Avenue. Construct pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii. ^� 8. Construct a driveway on Eagle Road, located as proposed 440 -feet south of, Fairview Avenue as a full access driveway. The driveway width should be limited to 40 -feet. The minimum storage length should be 100 -feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at,the driveway's intersection with Eagle Road. This driveway may be restricted to right-in/right-out movement in the future. Construct a deceleration lane for the driveway. 9. Construct a deceleration taper at the driveway on Eagle Road. Coordinate the design with ITD staff. iNICU99003.CNIvI Pa,e 8 10. The applicant shall be required to construct sidewalk abutting the site on Florence Street, Olive Avenue, and Jewell Street. Coordinate the location of the sidewalk with District staff. 11. Other than the access point specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Fairview Avenue is prohibited. 12. Construct a 30 to 36 -foot wide driveway on Olive Avenue, located approximately 145 -feet c+ south of Florence Street. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's C� intersection with Records Drive. 13. Construct a 30 to 36 -foot wide driveway on Olive Avenue, located approximately 160 -feet north of Florence Street. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Records Drive. 14. Construct a 30 to 36 -foot wide driveway on Jewell Street, located approximately 30 -feet east c of the west property line. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway's intersection with Records Drive. Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity, The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the --�� Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within two weeks of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #188, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. MCU99001CMM Page 9 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 8. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. MCU99003.CMM Page 10 MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING: MARCH 9 1999 APPLICANT: CLARK DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER: 5 i REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI -BUILDING COMMERCIAL & OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILITY WITH DRIVE THRU (TREASURE VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER) AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED LETTER FROM CLARK DEV. CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: REVIEWED CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. CLARK DEVELOPMENT Cr.,TvET) MAR U 1S9G City of Meridian Cit,; clerk office February 17, 1999 Mr. Malcolm MacCoy Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridiani, ID 83642 Re: CUp-99-003/'Treasure Valley Business Center Clark Development y Dear Chairman MacCoy: for continuance of the hearing on the conditionalthldmeeting date.. se permit for the This is a requestbe moved from p 13, 1999. of March 9, -1999, to the .Planning an subject project. We request that the meeting .d Zoning Commission meeting on April uesteis that our: presents several major issues for. The reason for this req e interchange at ACHD relating to the Meridian Gateway an Avenue atThese iss es will require the intersection of Eagle Road and Fairview analysis, discussions, and presentations to the A 1HDion:�ission, and extensive y therefore, an extended period for ACHD review of the app Thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincerely, ry Bill Clark cc: Sheri Stiles, Zoning Administrator Will Berg, City Clerk _ Larry Sale, ACHD 479 Main Street, Boise, Idaho 83702. 2081342-2625 e Fax 2081342-2627 • clarkdev@micron.net Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE Council Members CHARLES ROUNTREE GLENN BENTLEY RON ANDERSON KEITH BIRD HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 88.4-426.1 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (308) 884-5533 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 2, 1999 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 4, 1999 HEARING DATE: March 9, 1999 FILE NUMBER: CUP -99-003 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI -BUILDING COMMERCIAL & OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILITY WITH DRIVE-THRU BY: CLARK DEVELOPMENT LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAGLE RD. & FAIRVIEW AVE. TAMMY DE WEERD P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MARK NELSON, P/Z BYRON SMITH, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C _CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C KEITH BIRD, C/C ^GLENN BENTLEY, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT C ITY ATTOR N EY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ADA COUNTY (ANNEXATION) YOUR CONCISE R Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE Council Members CHARLES ROUNTREE GLENN BENTLEY RON ANDERSON KEITH BIRD KUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 881-4261 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-22l I PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 88.1-5533 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 2, 1999 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 4, 1999 HEARING DATE: March 9, 1999 FILE NUMBER: CUP -99-003 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTI -BUILDING COMMERCIAL & OFFICE INCLUDING BANK FACILITY WITH DRIVE-THRU BY: CLARK DEVELOPMENT LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAGLE RD. & FAIRVIEW AVE. _ TAMMY DE WEERD P/Z MALCOLM'MACCOY, P/Z, MARK NELSON, P/Z BYRON SMITH, P/Z `KEITH BORUP, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR 'RON ANDERSON, C/C 'CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _GLENN BENTLEY, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ADA COUNTY (ANNEXATION) 1) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Preliminary / Final / Short Plat ❑ I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. Kuna ❑ ACz ��G e r�icLv�l�ti� ��I,�i�c; �,7 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. M S. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: [I high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics ❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other b. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. E] 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. [� 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ® central sewage [] community sewage system ❑ community water well ❑ interim sewage central water ❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water [� 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water ❑ sewage dry lines ❑ central water ❑ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center ❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store 014. Sale 6?747-,?c 1 >°eY— i''G c0/:77,,9' er? C[aT?on f Date: S'T� /r1 1�are� %% -C'_!y7 est 7; Reviewed By: 67 CDNU 10191 (6, rtv. 1191 Review Sheet CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT r •• I1t'HEALTH DISTRICT Environmental Health Division Return Boise DEPARTMENT I `�I E E] Rezone # 1 2 11999 ElGarl den City Conditional Use # �l//� - �� ��'� `ity Cierk Offer e, Meridian Preliminary / Final / Short Plat ❑ I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. Kuna ❑ ACz ��G e r�icLv�l�ti� ��I,�i�c; �,7 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. M S. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: [I high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics ❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other b. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. E] 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. [� 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ® central sewage [] community sewage system ❑ community water well ❑ interim sewage central water ❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water [� 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water ❑ sewage dry lines ❑ central water ❑ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center ❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store 014. Sale 6?747-,?c 1 >°eY— i''G c0/:77,,9' er? C[aT?on f Date: S'T� /r1 1�are� %% -C'_!y7 est 7; Reviewed By: 67 CDNU 10191 (6, rtv. 1191 Review Sheet CENTRAL DISTRICT ''HEALTH O EPARTNAENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. AR,NISiPCNG PL. • ECISE. IC 837C3i325 (-Ca) 3;5.521 I Tu prevent and treat disease and disability; to prurnote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. STORNfWATER INL NAGEMENT RECONENfENDATIONS We recommend that stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: 1) State Of Idaho Catalog Of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities And Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division Of Environmental Quality, July 1997. 2) Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City Of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. Scormwacer 3/93:d(y Servin, Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ado / Boise County Office Ada -WIC Sctellite Office Elmore Count/ Office Vclley County Ottice 7C3 N. I;t Streer 7017 P1. Armsrong ?l. 1x76 RGCer S 520 E. atm Street i`l. Hcme.:0 83647 ?.O. e'ox I d4a 90 se. 10 83704 Ernnro. Hearn: 327.7499 2oise, i0 212705Vtounrcin Pn. 334 3355 Enviro. Hecltn: 587.7225 McCct, l0, $3632 Fcmdy P!cnr•ng: 327.71CC FAX. 331.325520 Family Hecttn: 521-.t"s07 P). 634-7 19a FAX. 634.2174 1mrcurozcr:cns: 327.7150 WIC: Sa7--G9 FA,(: 527-3521 Ser:cr Nurrnnon: 327.1460 ,MC 327.71?8 ® rrFAX :27-aSCC i 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 p OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 16 February 1999 �� SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 BRS Architects 1087 West River Street, Suite 160 Boise, ID 83702 RE: Land Use Change Application — Treasure Valley Business Park Dear BRS Architects: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above -referenced development. If this development is under a "rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application. Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned, operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P. Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the pressure urban irrigation system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate the process of contractual agreements between you and the Irrigation District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's office or John P. Anderson at the District's shop. Sincerely, 't - Donna N. Moore, Assistant Secretary/Treasurer cc: File Water Superintendent Clark Development City of Meridian enc.. - r _ APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000