Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKid's Club APPs Appeal of Decision of: T ~\ - _..~ APPEAL APPLICATION FORM Zoning Administrator City Engineer P&Z Commission Applicant: Address: S CIU~ ~~li~(,~ beJe.lpr~iVl~'u~~ CEti'~~~( Phone Number: Nature of Appeal: A~orrv~2d bu tilFrtcl~ct~n Firms ,~ ~~~~lc"tr~.r~ - i~icl~s C1~.~io u~ati~{S adGl ~ JCL s~, ~ee+ d~Fa~il~F`ti ka bL~i(r,~td~c, cup a '/Z aC ~ ~ ~~ 1~1~-a-c-> " ,~'~~ „ ~'he 3~K~ciS. ~Irenci;,ti o~r~n~~l~e~' bU r~~ d-~;~av~rn~,~,~s as ;r~U~,~t~cl , Sut~d~~.~,~~~,-,~ T YD~~' I ~,{ D l,U ~~P' f%~ ~ Y10 Ll~ I ~ 5 (,~ G~.CLI,~ ~ GiYe Thy' ('~ Vv ~~ (~ O Li` Vb1 n~1.1 i (1 ~ l LL1.f ~ (~ ~' ~~ r ~ J ~e~Phr~~Yt'~~~~ ~~ irn~ar.~ o~ Warr Same #'o~ K~dS?I ~~~ ~i~lS~ (~uY1~' ~-o c~dd mare ~rre -I~t> -IYu,i~a acc~m-~noc~rtkE -~In~ ~3U Glnildr~~ ~; h~vE. ~ti~~ ,~S~a, -~ -I~ wc~~ ,~e Ac~Cnc~ -I~~v~t,t.~h -t ~.r, h~~.t~ ~na ~~es.S C U~, ~; T `J PN Z --`~ G1.~ ~ ~• G CCU i ~ W hEn ~ hn ~ i U•~ lt,~t dl k -lu coo ~i-l~ ~C~ ~^~ r5 ~v ~~ c~.1 iw ~e a,Lu e~~ -}~~~ ~ ~ d ~~Tr~l ~~ul~'v'~ Lam"' I V~f'L~ -f~I~UU~-,6~ -~ ~'L~ PU~E~ l~uS ~C~Y 1 ,n~iS ~- ~-~ ~, ~,~ Fee: $100.00 ,~ ignature d tv ~Il ~ ho itiv~oaGi" vr~ ~l~ ~,, ~~ ~k r'le~~Ll~Ct1'~ cr /~Gl-1 D ~ nE~ ~rx rnore Pctt k,`n~i ** TX CONFIRMATI~REPORT ** AS OF JUN 11 '99 i4~50 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TOiFROM MODE MINiSEC PGS CMD# STATUS 11 06111 14 50 PUBLIC WORKS OF--S 00'16" 001 040 OK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- T.L. ~ ~ _. ~ '~ ,'.i 1 _ 1, '~~~a j ~ iC~~y APPEAL APPLICATION FORM " V Appeal of Decision of: Zoning Administrator City Engineer P&Z Coaunission Applicant: Address: Phone Number: Nahue of Appeal:- Ad ntu~reGl bu hlfytcl~n~n Firs. ,~ ~ ~-,; I,~~.~,~ ~K irl'S l l~ ~ u: c.v~'~S ~~ ad~i ~ ~COs~• eek i ~ {z ~ ~ ~t .o c c a 'Iz acre. '• ~-{ „ ~"he 3~K~rly. ~ ren d~ti o~m~~4ed bu ~ ~ d-~ v} ~~ y, ~ as r~~ - ~~ m d S ~ i~ ~ , ~ y urr~<<,~ ,~ron tl7.i o~ur<orh k new c~•5 A d.~ CGrE Thet-~ i~t~Q UO ~o~v,~ln ~ n~~ ~l,t,~r,n~ 'r,~ ~lt?Qi;nr t)fpc,oc,[ / r ,. nnl„ r)n?LOU1~Pr,~ tvUrr~ -~ri ~ lllcit~}~nY1,1 (l'L~S ~~~ G}ftT~" ~ r ~At in F ~~ ir» o Wa~Zr ~5ame #'o{ KrdS. ~ ' ~ ~ G.Y1~' ~-o ?N z ~ u'~th c uw, ~~ GGC.~i~ WhEY1 i~hnf ~ai~P i ~~k ~~ 1.0 ~; f~,/~„~f~ ~v1~ ~i we a.L~'e~t ~ -}~,~h f~ 2 d ~lrrl wln~;n I,~A2 ~v-~r~, -1~h,~vt,~,h Y~o ov~v ire h..a_n•r~ n~rS. ~ ~-~1~ "~ ~ ~ti~ Fee: $100.00 u ~ agnature WWII fnB ho iw,oaLi' on aka r,;l-,., b~ 1~e~,r~;ar~ ar f~G~-{~ (neeri for Mo k CITY O~ MERIDIAN "Hub of Treasure Valley" 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 888433 ~u5iomer s Order No. Date Name Y\ ~ Q, Address S ~~~ Phone:g~~ ---7 `S 3 1 SOLD BY ~ CASH C.O.D. CHARGE ON ACCT. MDSE. RETD. PAID OU7 /\X/''_ E ~ ~ V~~ ~ ~O t n I I ~,` Q v I I ~C ~ I I I I I I I All claims and returne oods MUST:be accompanied 'by this .bill. ~ ` TAX 0010705 B ~ TOTAL I ~' GS-202-2 PRINTED IN U.S.A. ,J PN~NTEO WITN ~~ ~_Q SOYINK. C._J~twvu 61.U * ~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 20 1999 The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:30 p.m. on July 6, 1999 by Mayor Corrie. MEMBERS PRESENT: Ron Anderson, Keith Bird, Glenn Bentley, Charlie Rountree. OTHERS PRESENT: Mayor Bob Corrie, Will Berg, Bill Gordon, Tom Kuntz, Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, and Steve Rutherford. Corrie: I'll open the Meridian City Council Meeting, Tuesday July 20, 1999, 7:30 p.m. Mr. Clerk could you have the roll call please? Thank you. I want to welcome everybody here this evening and thank you for coming. Council you have the consent agenda, Item A approval of the minutes from the previous meeting held July 6, and then Item B the authorization for real estate purchase and sales agreement. Bentley: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bentley. Bentley: I move we approve consent agenda items A & B. Corrie: Do I hear a second? Bird: I'll second it. Corrie: Ok. On this the attorney will have to draw up a resolution and present that to you at the next regular scheduled meeting in August, and if you have any questions there. Any other discussions? Bird: Mr. Mayor? That's when we get the resolution in and we'll discuss it? Corrie: Right, that's correct. Bird: That answered my question. Corrie: Motion made and seconded we approve the consent agenda. All in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Opposed, nay. All ayes. ITEM #1 TABLED 7/6/99: APPEAL OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUIREMENT BY CINDY CHACE d/b/a KID'S CLUB: Corrie: Shari, we'll have you go first. • • Meridian City Council Meeting July 20, 1999 Paget Stiles: Mr. Mayor and council I believe this was tabled so they could come up with some additional information regarding their original conditional use permit and why they should not be required to go through a modification of that. This is the original plan that was submitted with her conditional use permit. This is where the parking lot would be, here's the single car garage, this is where the existing house is. This is the plan that they've submitted with a (inaudible) conditional use permit application. We have not started processing that yet, pending the outcome of this. This was the original house and then the garage and this is the proposed building that they're showing. The staff still maintains it is a modification of the existing conditional use permit and should follow the procedures outlined in the ordinance. Corrie: Does the council have any questions for Shari at this time? Bentley: I have none. Bird: I have none right now. Corrie: Ok, I believe it's Mrs. Chace. C. Chace: (inaudible) Corrie: Give your name and address for the record please. C. Chace: Do you want my home address? Corrie: No. C. Chace: Cindy Chace 1302 E. 1St St. In an attempt to do as you requested to get together with the administrator, I met with her today and I was told that she was not willing to discuss it and she had already made her decision. So I've prepared a statement for you and if you have any questions, I'll address them. "I'm sure you are all aware that Idaho ranks last in America's quality standards for child care. The standards are set by the Department of Health and Welfare and it was those standards and those of the Meridian Fire Department that we used when determining our capacity and when we filed for our original conditional use permit. Last winter we determined that although our capacity of 30 is adequate most of the-year, when winter comes with inclimate weather, the children can not be accommodated for ten hours a day, five days a week in the current facility. We have complied with each aspect of the original conditions of the conditional use permit and are requesting you to appeal the decision of the Planning and Zoning Administrator to allow us to add an accessory building which meets all of the planning and zoning criteria of accessory building, to the property to provide a greater play area for the children; increasing the current 35 square foot per child to 63 1/3 square feet per child which is only an 8x8 space per child; without the need for an • Meridian City Council Meeting July 20, 1999 Page3 amended conditional use permit. We relied on the Department of Health and Welfare telling us the space would be ample for our needs when indeed they turned out to be inadequate. The argument of planning and zoning is we are requesting to change the original conditional use permit and it should be reprocessed. However, aside from the objection of Faye Buchanan regarding children darting into the center which could be killed or injured, which is not an issue due to the required fencing, there were no objections of the child care center and I find it unlikely that anyone would disapprove of a child care center improving its quality. Thus, no need to have another hearing if the conditions of the original conditional use permit have been followed." Corrie: Ok, council, do you have some questions? Rountree: Mr. Mayor? Corrie: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: The original conditional use permit spoke of only the use of the existing property and the existing structures on the property. That was what was brought to the public. That's what the public hearing addressed and that's what the public had an opportunity to comment on. And if Shari's representation is correct, and is that a correct representation of what it is you're going to do? C. Chace: It is, but I don't want you to be misled by the size of the addition because it is actually 38% of the building because it is a three-story building. So it looks like the original is smaller, but it's not. Rountree: But it's essentially the same layout and it would be in that particular location on the property. C. Chace: Yes. Well, we found out last week that there is one thing that it would have to be set back into the back yard. We just did that for aesthetics for the city to make it look nice, but if you wanted it set back into the back yard that wouldn't be a problem either. But yes, we want to add that size of a space. Rountree: I guess the point I'm making is that that concept was not part of the public process in that part of town which requires a conditional use for that kind of conversion. I can understand your frustration with the city's ordinances, but we have them and we try to live with them to the benefit of all the folks in the community. I guess I'm of the opinion that that's enough different than what was presented publicly previously that I would probably have to lean towards Shari's recommendation of requiring an amendment or a new conditional use permit. That's all I have to say. Corrie: Any other comments, questions council. Bird: I have none now. • • Meridian City Council Meeting July 20, 1999 Page4 C. Chace: Thank you. Corrie: Mr. Chace do you want to say anything? R. (Raymond) Chace: I would, if that's alright. Again when I initially brought this forward to the zoning administrator I was lead to believe this is simple accessory use permit requirement. It's incidental to the building, we're increasing the capacity of the child care, and we have not changed the conditional use permit for which this was submitted. In answer to your question, Mr. Rountree, I was also under the impression that the site of the conditional use permit was approved for the site for the buildings for which it sat. However, I was lead to believe that when an additional building of a certain size structure meeting certain bathroom, square footage requirements, kitchenette requirements, it would be encompassed in that conditional use permit as an accessory, as incidental to the building. Again, when I went before the administrator in February of this year, I was told to do that, which is what I did. Also, Brad, but I don't know his last name, did concur with me and only when I submitted the conditional use permit was it flipped to this particular hearing that we're at now. That's my frustration. That's her frustration. Thank you. Rountree: Mr. Mayor? Corrie: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I had a question. You indicated you'd been led to believe that it was an accessory use. Was that based on your interpretation of the city's ordinance and the reading of what accessory use may be? R. Chace: Yes, and concurring with Brad. Rountree: Thank you. Corrie: Any comments, council? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Ok, well you have before you the appeal for the zoning permit requirement. So either deny the appeal or approve the appeal. I will entertain a motion to (inaudible). Rountree: Mr. Mayor I have a question for Shari. Corrie: Ok. i ~ Meridian City Council Meeting July 20, 1999 Pages Rountree: Shari what process at a minimum would you advise going through to enable you to issue a zoning compliance for a building permit for this particular activity? Stiles: A modification of the conditional use permit, going through the original process. Rountree: And is that a two hearing process or a one hearing process? Stiles: It's actually in a CC zone so it could be done through planning and zoning and then go directly to council. Rountree: Ok. Bird: Mr. Mayor? Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: Shari, I've got a question. If they were to add a walkway and make that as an addition would they have to go through this? Stiles: There's been confusion as far as what and accessory building is and there are some criteria for an accessory building, however it's not the issue of whether it's an accessory building or not, the issue is it's a pretty substantial change to their initial conditional use permit. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, another question for Shari. Corrie: Ok, Mr. Rountree. Rountree: If there were a common wall or simply a building modification is it still a significant change? What I heard the applicant say is that is was more additional space for the existing child care facility, not to increase the number of children they care for. Stiles: I don't believe the original conditional use permit stated any minimum on the number of children. Even though they represented that they just want additional space, not additional children, there would be nothing to prevent them from adding as many children as they could house within that new building. If they came in, when I initially talked to them, it was January 1st", they looked in my records and phone log, it was just discussed about an addition. I can't state over the phone what's going to be required. I get those calls all of the time. It's getting to the point where I'm going to have something in writing and respond in writing because of the misinterpretations. Had they come in, say they wanted to enlarge a room by 100 square feet or something -like that, we'd probably not say they had to go through a conditional use permit. But I think when Meridian City Council Meeting July 20, 1999 Page6 you're talking about 830 square feet, that's not a minor modification, plus an additional building. Rountree: Is the language in the ordinance specific about minor modifications? Stiles: No, it's purely a judgement call. Rountree: Is it specific about separate structures? Stiles: Number of buildings on a lot. It talks about principle buildings. It says when there's more than one principle building on a lot. Let's say they wanted to move out, make an office building out of the one and do whatever with the rest of the existing structure, we wouldn't have a whole lot to do with it. It would just be approved. Rountree: Ok, thank you. Corrie: Any further discussion? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion. Rountree: Mr. Mayor? Corrie: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we deny the appeal for the P & Z Administrators requirement for CUP for this particular application for the day care. Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to deny the appeal (inaudible) CUP as requested. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion, say aye. Anderson: Aye. Bentley: Aye. Rountree: Aye. Corrie: Opposed, no. Bird: No. Corrie: Ok, 3-1 the appeal is denied. THREE AYES, ONE NAY: MOTION CARRIED MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JULY 20 1999 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1 - APPLICANT: REQUEST: A AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: .CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: COQ SEE ATTACHED MINUTES FROM 7/6/99 ORIGINAL FINDINGS AND 2-405j ~~ ~ wpP~ ~l J~' ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: o Meridian. OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of Meridian City Council Meeting July 6, 1999 Page 10 Bentley: Second. Come: Motion made and second to have the attdeneal of theurequestlfor and tional use Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order fo permit of Moxie Java, item number 9. Any further discussion? ROLL CALL VOTE: ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. 10. APPEAL OF ZONING ADMINISTRA dOb ' KICDS C UIBNAL USE PERMIT REQUIREMENT BY CINDY CHAC Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I don't have a graphic of this. They have submitted a conditional use permit application, but they ationof the or ginaecondit oval usetpe m tr into a new conditional use permit for modific If ou're Their proposing an 800 square foot building to be added to the property. y familiar with the property, it's just north of the Post Office on E: 1St Stree Howeverrthe proposing it beyond the setback just on the north side of their property. applicant when he came in to talk to us, indicat oval build ng with a k tchenette or010'm not ,square feet and we felt the addition of an add sure what the terminology was and a restroom even though the number of children cared for would be the same would constitute a significant change and that's the reason we requested a new conditional use permit application. Corrie: While this isn't a public hearing, we would like to hear what the appeal is. Chace: Thank you very much. My name is Raymond Chace and I sit on the Board of Directors of the Parent Company at Kid s Club and weded to add th srbuilding waspan al this because our initial understanding of what was ne accessory use permit based on the square footage of the new building, which is what we felt and what was initially thought of as incidental to the all additiolnal sewer, trash, accordance with our previous permit, we will consent to pay insure the building conforms to the look of the i drenren therwinter timeh No ~mtpact on provide existing space as Shan said for the ch I for ACHD, no further staff or children will be dtb eakiteo Wa pursuant to the buildp g permit. the accessory use permit, pay the fee a g Thank you. Corrie: Council have any questions? Meridian City Council Meeting July 6, 1999 Page 11 Bird: I have none. Corrie: Thank you. So the Council has an idea here, you can either accept the appeal of the Zoning Administrator's conditional use permit requirement. You can not require a conditional use permit or you can deny the appeal and stay with the administrator's conditional use requirement. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I have a question for Shari. If I heard correctly the applicant is asking for an accessory use permit and that doesn't equate with what is happening there. Stiles: We did look at the possibility of whether we could consider it an accessory building, and it didn't meet the criteria for being considered an accessory building. That's why we wanted them to come back with the modification of the originally approved conditional use permit. Chace: Unfortunately I don't have any documentation that defines an accessory use. My understanding is that an accessory use is 50% of the square footage or less, and we are just over 34-35% on this buildingliancle with our original and exisg g cond tional use requirement and we are still in comp permit when I was before you February of 1997. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, it still seems to mmend that staff and the applicant ont nueeto 0 parties here, and I guess I would reco talk through this until we're communicating and using the same terms and understanding what accessory use is per our ordinance and trying to find out what their understanding of it is so we can reach an agreement. Without that I guess I would not have sufficient information to make a recommendation. Other than that, I would be supportive of staffs recommendation to deny the appeal, but l think there's still some room for communication here that needs to go on. Corrie: At the risk of telling him absolutely no, Shari can you two get together one more time and kind of work out the v~?rbiage here so everybody is on the same page? Stiles: I believe we've done that. Everything that we've discussed has been misinterpreted and I think we're at an impasse now where like tonight he comes in here and says he understood 50% increase was the ordinance and that was -not even insinuated. Rountree: Shari, I know this is asking a lot, could you paraphrase to us what accessory use means? Stiles: I don't have the ordinance in front of me now. It talks about accessory buildings. Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, while they are looking it seems to me that the decision and what the Council has to grapple with in this particular application is Meridian City Council Meeting July 6, 1999 Page 12 first there needs to be some kind of analysis of the findings and conclusions of law of the conditional use permit that was originally issued here. I think I have heard it's kind of a bold statement that this is in compliance, but I didn't hear any analysis of why that was the case because I think the issue here is whether or not this applicant needs to file for an amendment to the conditional use permit that was granted before in order to accomplish what they hope to accomplish. -have an accessory use permit and I think we have to look at those findings and I didn't see any brief or anything filed with this other than what we've heard this evening. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, what we were relying on is one part of the ordinance that says if you have more than one building on a lot, it would require a conditional use permit. Things such as a shed, or a garage, we can approve through -call it an accessory building. Say it's incidental to the use of the approved use and we do approve those without having to go through this process for the modification. Under 11- 2-405J, modification or amendment of approved application or use. It states all applications for amendment, alteration or modification of an approved application or use shall be treated as an initial application and must be processed in the same fashion and under the same procedures as an initial application. That's what we were relying on in our determination. We have spoken to them on numerous occasions, tried to work with them to see if there's a way to get around that. Staff did not feel that we had that ability to forego that provision of the ordinance. There is also under the accessory building standards, it's quite lengthy, it would be under 11-2-410D2A, and there are a number of things that did not meet the requirements to be determined. in accessory building. It would have had to be located in - it said if it's not in a rear yard, an accessory building shall be connected with the principal building, which it is not. If it was in the rear yard, it couldn't exceed 15 feet. I think they met that. Couldn't be located within 25 feet of an adjacent residentially zoned lot. I'm not sure they could meet that. So that's what we're using is because we didn't consider it to be an accessory building. I don't see a way to approve this Bentley: Mr. Mayor in light of what Shari has read, appeal. It sounds like it's going to have to go through modification. Chace: Is it possible to respond since this is an appeal of that to her assertations. We are zoned as an R-15. There ale no residential buildings anywhere near the building. We are 15 foot setback. It's on a half acre lot. If you did see the building plat, the language and the interpretation of the language with the definition of the incidental building or the definition of the off site building is vague and that is why I'm before you. Initially we approached this in February or March of this year, and we delayed it based and we relied on the zoning administration's terminology. This would be an accessory use building. We therefore did not apply until we were ready to break ground and when we started to break ground, that when we found out we had to go through the initial conditional use permit process again and we are in compliance with the initial use permit. We've had no complaints. We're not tearing down any trees, we're not increasing the flow of traffic. We're not putting an unburdened use on the sewer system which I think addresses most of the concerns that a public hearing would (End of Tape) Meridian City Council Meeting July 6, 1999 Page 13 Chace: ...that's why I'm here before you today: This is going to add a significant cost to us in a delay if this isn't granted, so thank you very much again. Corrie: Comments from Council? Rountree: Mr. Mayor, by way of discussion, I personally see two ways to go. One if the applicant is willing to substantiate and evaluate the conditional use permit and the findings and build a case to support his position, I would be willing to table this item for yet another discussion. Or I would have to take the recommendation of staff based on the definitions that were read and the basis that they had for their denial. Corrie: Any further discussion? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion one way or the other and we can see where it goes. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I would have to direct a question back to the audience. and - Chace: Absolutely, I would agree to that. Rountree: You would agree to evaluate the conditions? I present that no guarantee. Chace: I understand. Rountree: But you seem passionate about your position so we'll give you an opportunity to present that. Chace: Right now? Rountree: No, in two weeks. Chace: Okay. Corrie: If that happens to be the Council's decision. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I would move that we table this item for two weeks to our next regularly scheduled meeting July 20th to receive additional information on the requested appeal. Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and second to delay the appeal for information from the applicant and administrator on i±em number ten on the conditional use permit. Any further discussion? Bentley: Mr. Mayor maybe it would help us if we had some copies of the record on that. Rountree: The CUP. Corrie: Shari, can you have that for us as well? Thank you. Bird: Mr. Mayor, also I would like to see a site plan. Corrie: Okay, I think the applicant can get that as well. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Meridian City Council Meeting July 6, 1999 Page 14 Corrie: If you will check with Shari and well you can get whatever you want to get ready for it. Shari, you can get the information to us for July the 20~" meeting. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR REINSTATEMENT OF APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR OLSEN BUSH II BY R2 DEVELOPMENT, INC. -WEST END OF LANARK STREET: Corrie: I will open the public hearing at this time and we'll entertain the staff to testify first. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I do not have a transparency on this. This is the property immediately west of the existing Olsen Bush Subdivision No. 1. It's where Wheel City USA, Yankee has some property back in there, and this was an extension to the west. I would have a cul-de-sac or I'm not sure that these drawings that are included in your packets are the approved plat. But staff would recommend approval of reinstatement of the approved preliminary plat with the conditions in that original approval. I would like the applicant to be able to come and state when they are going to submit the final plat. They've asked for this variance because the time has expired for them to be able to submit the final plat. Rountree: Question for Shari or Gary, either one. Is this the first extension that's been requested? Stiles: Yes. Rountree: Okay, thank you. Stiles: It's the first variance that's been - I believe they already did a time extension, no? They must have just missed the cut off for the time extension then. I'm sorry, I don't have the right file here with me, so Brad if you could let them know what the original approval date was. Miller: Brad Miller with Van Auker, actually R2 Development. I believe it was approved Shari in the summer of 1996 and we allowed it to expire because we didn't have the easement necessary to get our sewer through there, so now that we have sewer; the easement and the sewer system there, we're ready to move ahead, so we're asking that the City Council -since to the best of knowledge there's no changes in the ordinances or anything and the preliminary plat is going to stay the same, it would make sense to go ahead and extend that time frame. Bird: That delay was because of getting the right-of-way through the property there. Miller: Correct from the Elixir Industries to get that easement, which all of you are aware and with the help of the Mr. Mayor and City Council, we're able to get that done. In fact I got a call today from Elixir Industries demanding a bill for their portion of it. So I'll add on some time for the City Council to that bill. Corrie: It was April 12t", 1999 by the way. Administrator, If, in the sole d ~cretion of the Zoning Administrator, the changes do not substantially effect the interests of those persons entitled to notice by mail, the Zoning Administrator may allow the changes to be made without requiring that the application be refiled and re- noticed. Alterations, amendments, or modifications that increase the amount of land or change the zoning district, the use of the property, the density, increase the impact on surrounding property', etc., shall be considered as substantial changes and shall require the application to be refiled and re-noticed. If the application does not need to be refiled or re-noticed no additional filing fees shall be required. If the application is required to be re-noticed additional fees for re-mailing and republication shall be required. If the application is required to be refiled an additional filing fee shall be required. 2-405 J MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF APPROVED APPLICATION OR USE All applications for amendment, alteration or modification of an approved application or use shall be treated as an initial application and must be processed in the same fashion and under the same procedures as an initial application. (Ord. 592, 11-17-92) 2-406 NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES AND USES 2-406 A INTENT It is the intent of this Ordinance to permit conforming uses. All applications for the enlargement, expansion, extension of non- conforming uses or all applications for the addition of other structures or uses prohibited elsewhere in the same district shall be subject to the Conditional Use procedures of Section 2-418 of this Ordinance. (Ord. 430, 4-2-84) 193 -34- BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RAYMOND CHACE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DAY CARE CENTER 1302. EAST FIRST STREET MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled matter having come on' for public hearing on January 16, 1997, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m., the Applicant, Raymond Chace, hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant," appearing in person, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian having duly considered the evidence and the matter makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. A notice of a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit was published for two ( 2 ) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for January 16, 1997, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the January 16, 1997 hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. This property is located within the City of Meridian. 3. The Applicant does not own the land. The land is owned by Gary and Peggy Timson, and they have consented to the application. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 1. CHACE 4. The property is currently zoned C-C, Community Business District; that in the ZONING SCHEDULE OF USE CONTROL, Section 11-2- 409 B., Commercial, Child Care Center is listed as a conditional use in the C-C District and, therefore, in the C-C District a conditional use permit for the operation of a Child Care Center is required. 5. The C-C, Community Business District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 9 as follows: 1C-C1 Community Business District: The purpose of the (C-C) District is to permit the establishment of general business uses that are of a larger scale than a neighborhood business, and to encourage the development of modern shopping centers with adequate off-street parking facilities, and associated site amenities to serve area residents and employees;. to prohibit strip commercial development and encourage the clustering of commercial .enterprises. All such districts shall have direct access to a transportation arterial and collector and be connected to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. 6. Conditional Use Permit is defined in the Zoning And Development Ordinance, City of Meridian, Idaho as follows: "Permits allowing an exception to the uses authorized by this Ordinance in a zoning district." 7. The property is located at 1302 East 1st Street, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 8. The Applicant testified that they have placed an offer to purchase the property, and their intention is to operate a day care for children for twelve (12) or more children. 9. The Applicant testified as follows. They have reviewed the comments from the City Engineer, the Planning Director, t::e FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 2. CHACE Meridian Fire Department, Central District Health and the irrigation questions. They attended the ACHD (Ada County Highway District) hearing. They are prepared to comply with all of the comments. With regard to the driveway, they are prepared to pave with cement the existing driveway and expand it to the curb which was recommended in item C. of the ACHD comments and conform to the City's guidelines. 10. The Applicant testified as follows in response to questions of Commissioner MacCoy. They are aware of the fence height requirements.,. The gates of the fence surrounding the play area will be lockable. They will comply with signage requirements so as not to create a nuisance to neighboring properties. They are unable to and will not offer their day care services to handicapped children, but they will conform to the Americans With Disabilities Act Federal guidelines for handicap access to the property. They will submit floor plan of the house on the property. To the Applicant's knowledge, they have received no complaints from surrounding neighbors. 11. The Applicant testified as follows in response to questions of Commissioner Borup. They received an off-street parking design and dimensional table from the City of Meridian, with which they will be able to comply. - 12. The Applicant testified that the hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday; there will be no overnight hours of operation. The operation will be closed Saturdays and Sundays. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 3. CHACE 13. The Applicant testified that there is on the southern border an irrigation ditch which is covered and secured. There is a pump which is covered. There are two fences which separate the children from the ditch and pump. 14. Dale Ownby testified concerning the location and coverage of the ditch. He testified that the ditch is covered with a steel grate and the remainder is underground. 15. E. Faye Brewer Buchanan submitted a letter objecting to this application, which letter is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 16. The Assistant to the City Engineer, Bruce Freckleton, submitted comments which are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. His comments included that all driveway and parking areas shall be paved; that graveled driveways, parking and access are unacceptable; that a drainage plan designed by the State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas; that all site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site; that any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605 M.; that plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department; that outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on ary nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11- FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 4. CHACE • • 2-414 D. 3.; that all signs shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in 2-415 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance; that sanitary sewer and water to the facility would be through existing service lines; that assessments for sewer and water service will be reviewed to determine whether additional load justifies an adjustment to the assessments; that the Applicant provide any information that they may have with regards to your anticipated water demand; and that the Applicant will be required to enter into an Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian. 17. The Planning and Zoning Administrator, Shari Stiles, submitted comments which are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 18. Meridian City Police Department, Meridian Fire Department, and Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District -submitted comments, which respective comments are hereby incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 19. Central District Health Department submitted comments, which comments are hereby incorporated herein as if set forth in full. Its comments included that after written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, it can approve this application for central sewage and central water; and that it will require plans be submitted for a plan review for the child care center. 20. Ada County Highway District submitted comments and requirements, all of which comments and requirements are hereby incorporated herein as if set forth in full, and some of which are FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 5. CHACE ~ ~ more particularly set forth as follows. As site specific requirements that the Applicant reconstruct the existing 12-foot curb cut driveway as a 24 to 30 foot wide curb return driveway with 15-foot curb radii, located on the south property line; that the Applicant pave the drive its full required width of 24 to 30-feet beyond the edge of pavement on East 1st Street; that as required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of the property; and that other than the access point(s) specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to East 1st Street is prohibited. 21. There was no further testimony given at the hearing. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. All the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. The City of Meridian has authority to grant conditional uses pursuant to Idaho Code Section 67-6512 and pursuant to 11-2- 418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 3. The City has the authority to take judicial notice of its own ordinances and proceedings, other governmental •statues and ordinances, and of actual conditions existing within the City and state of Idaho. 4. The City of Meridian has authority to place conditions on a conditional use permit and the use of the property pursuant to FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 6. CHACE • • Idaho Code Section 67-6512 and pursuant to that section conditions minimizing the adverse impact on other development, controlling the duration of development, assuring the development is maintained properly, and on-site or off-site facilities, may be attached to the permit; that 11-2-418 (D) authorizes the City to prescribe a set time period for which a conditional use may be in existence. 5. Section 11-2-418 D. states as follows: In approving any Conditional Use, the' Commission and Council may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds, and safeguards in conformity with this Ordinance. Violations of such conditions, bonds or safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the Conditional Use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of the Ordinance and grounds to revoke the Conditional Use. The Commission and Council may prescribe a set time period for which a Conditional Use may be in existence.. 6. The City has judged this Application for a conditional use upon the basis of guidelines contained in Section 11-2-418 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and upon the basis of the Local Planning Act of 1975, Title 67 Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and the record submitted to it and the things of which it may take judicial notice. 7. 11-2-418(C) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian sets forth the standards under which the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall review applications for Conditional Use Permits; that upon a review of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and the conditions of the area and assuming that the above conditions or FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 7. CHACE • similar ones thereto would be attached to the conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission concludes as follows: a. The use, would in fact, constitute a conditional use and a conditional use permit would be required by ordinance; b. The use would be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan but the Zoning Ordinance requires a conditional use permit to allow the use; c. The use is designed and constructed to be harmonious in appearance with the character of the general vicinity; that if the conditions set forth herein are complied with the use should be operated and maintained to be harmonious with the intended character of the general vicinity and should not change the essential character of the area; d. That the use would not be hazardous nor should it be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses if the conditions are met; that traffic will increase, but due to the drop-off and pick-up being off of the street it should not be a problem; e. The property has sewer and water service already connected, but Applicant may have to pay additional fees for the use; f. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and the use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; g. If the conditions involve a use, activity, conditions of operation person, property or the excessive production of glare or odors; are met, the use should not process, material, equipment or that would be detrimental to general welfare by reason of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, h. Sufficient parking for the proposed use will be required to meet the requirements of the City ordinance; and i. The development and uses will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or .scenic feature of major importance. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 8. CHACE • • 8. Since conditions may be placed upon the granting of a conditional use permit to minimize adverse impact on other development, it is recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission that the following conditions of granting the conditional use be required, to wit: a. The children, if outside, shall be maintained in the fenced area, as required below; b. There shall be fencing, gates and locks for the outside play area such that no children can leave the property without an adult unlocking and opening the gate to let the child or children out of the play area; no children shall be allowed outside of the play area or the home without an adult being present; the fence shall be maintained in good repair and the children, when outside, shall stay in the fenced area and the children shall not be allowed outside of the fenced area or the home, except for drop-off and pick-up times, and an adult shall be with them at all times if the child or children are waiting to be picked up; c. The Applicant shall meet the state of Idaho requirements for staff to children ratio; d. The Central District Health Department and the state of Idaho Department of Health and Welfare have requirements for day cares and the Applicant shall meet those requirements of the Central District Health Department and the state of Idaho Department of Health and Welfare; e. The conditional use, pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance, shall not be transferable to another owner of the property or to another property; f. The Applicant shall meet the requirements of the City Engineer's office, the Planning and Zoning Administrator, and other governmental agencies submitting comments, which comments specifically include: 1. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved; 2. Graveled driveways,. parking and access are unacceptable; 3. A drainage plan designed by the State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 9. CHACE • shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas; 4. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site; 5. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605 M. and the plans for such will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department; 6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-2-414 D. 3.; 7. All signs shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in 2-415 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance;. 8. Sanitary sewer and water to the facility would be through existing service lines; 9. Assessments for sewer and water service will be reviewed to deteaine whether additional load justifies an adjustment to the assessments, and that the Applicant provide any information that they may have with regards to the anticipated water demand; and 10. The Applicant will be required to enter into an Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian. g. The conditional use should not be restricted to a period of authorization but may be reviewed annually, upon notice to the Applicant, for violation of any conditions imposed herein;andZn ether da3 ^arA ~~~-~ena-l-uses-a~rtd- 9. The above-conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the Applicant shall meet these conditions. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 10. CHACE 10. It is recommended that if the Applicant meets the conditions stated above that the conditional .use permit be granted to the Applicant. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER BORUP COMMISSIONER OSLUND COMMISSIONER MACCOY CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED VOTED ~~H VOTED 1 ~ ~ G VOTED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 11. CHACE • • DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law or similar conditions as found justified and appropriate by the City Council and that the property be required to meet the water and sewer requirements, the fire and life safety codes, Uniform Fire Code and other Ordinances of the City of Meridian. The conditional use should be subject to review upon notice to the Applicant by the City. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: ti-1~-9~ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 12. CHACE APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian City Council hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact ~ ~~`~ay and Conclusions of Law on this ~ day of ~ ~ ~ ~, 199` ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN MORROW COUNCILMAN BENTLEY COUNCILMAN ROUNTREE COUNCILMAN TOLSMA MAYOR CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) (INITIAL) APPROVE FINDINGS OF FACTAND VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED DISAPPROVED NS OF LAW - ~~ ~ _ ~~/IG~L' Meridian City Counc~ . February 18, 1997 Page 21 Bentley: Mr. Mayor, the City of Meridian City Council hereby recommends that they approve the conditional use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law or similar conditions as imund justified and appropriate by the City Council. And that the property be required tQ meet the water and sewer requirements, the fire and life safety codes, uniform fire code and other ordinances of the City of Meridian. The conditional use permit should be subject to review upon notice to the applicant by the City. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley, second by Mr. Rountree on the decision and recommendation, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #11: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CHILD CARE CENTER FOR 12+ CHILDREN BY RAYMOI~? CHACE: Corrie: Is Mr. Chace or a representative here? Chace: My name is Raymond Chace, Crookston: Mr. Mayor, is this not a public hewing? Corrie: It is not on my agenda Crookston: It should be Berg: Shari, this does not require two public hearings does it? Stiles: No Corrie: Mr. Chace? Chace: Would you like me to offer a brief sy~psis. We put in an offer to purchase the property at 1302 East First Street. The City afi Meridian requested the conditional use permit for a child care center for 12 or more children. I sit on the board of directors of the parent company and we have reviewed the comments from the engineer, the planning director, the fire department. I personally attended the ACRD hearing and reviewed the district health and welfare comments and irrigation questions and the proposal. I am prepared to answer any questions you have. This is the last hurdle I believe before the purchase contract is completed. Meridian City Counc~ February 18, 1997 Page 22 Corrie: Okay, Council, questions of Mr. Chace? Morrow. Mr. Mayor, you are in agreement then with all of the staff conditions and you have no problem with complying with any of those? Chace: Yes sir and no we don't have any problem complying. Come: Thank you Mr. Chace. Council, have you had a chance to read the findings of fact and conclusions of law, any questions? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I had a question on page 10, item G. The last part of that statement. It says "a conditional use should not be restricted to a period of authorization but maybe reviewed annually upon notice to the applicant for violation of any conditions imposed herein and in other day care conditional uses and other conditional use applications." I guess I just didn't understand if they are going to have to abide by conditions placed on other conditional use permits. Should, the previous one had that comment in it too, I wonder if it should be stopped at herein. Corrie: Counselor? Crookston: That would be fine. Rountree: There or the second and? Crookston: It would be herein, in the fourth line, period the end. Stiles: Thanks Corrie: Thank you Ms. Stiles, any other corrections. I will entertain a motion on the findings of fact and conclusions. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I move that the Meridian City Council adopts these modified findings of fact and conclusions of law. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree, second by Mr. Bentley to accept the Planning and Zoning Commissions findings of fact and conclusions of law as modified, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Tolsma -Yea, Rountree -Yea, Bentley -Yea, Morrow -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JULY 6, 1999 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 10 APPLICANT: CINDY CHACE REQUEST: APPEAL OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUIREMENT AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED APPEAL APPLICATION CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ~~ MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: 1~ L ~fj ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: V4 ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: F+~ SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meri ian. • • Appeal of Decision of: Applicant: Address: Phone Number: Nature of Appeal: -b add ~ ~~ ~G .31~ ~ i ~~~ APPEAL APPLICATION FORM Zoning Administrator City Engineer P&Z Commission CITY ®F'~~€l'~ ~:~1w~!-:, b M2rtd n rE -1 r ~ - tC i~ l~s C lib wa~n~S a `I Z ctC t ~. ~ i~ ;, ~D L1, i ~ 0 y1i ~ ~ kS G1 r - ~ Surru rdi n~ _~ S a d,~IAA CG1Ye~The~ Fl~'e"(`~ YVO LQ1MD~/l;~kc. /~A~f1f~Gj ~~ ~ ~ nl o (AV1~ r m ~ ,c, s -~4~ Y- In .--_ S~ C ~ l re u ~~ ~ ~~ r ~rtn A.~ ~~~~ Lvi ll )~ no ~bn i ~ ~ c~ ln; td~1 .~ hers ~. d W ~I~ X02 ho tv~n A,G~' Uri ~'lnR ~ 1 1,C~if~~G1 or AGl-1 ~ nQe ~x mor at ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~Da(?h~l-'~YA~~1l, `I N`~ ~MPar.~ on U~~ ~5ame #o~ K~dS•1 ~ ~~2 ~t~S'~ WU~'1~" a ~ re -~u D~ccom ~'~ Gln~ r~~ w~ ~.u~ ruuf'~ /~ YYl . ~ W(A t oCn ~ v i tl CUSS G _ . wh ~k -} ~ veers wh w~e a,L~ec~elc~ ~r~~ ~w1n.P,;n w,e. I~-2~-~,-1 -I-~,~ Y~ u~2 v i~ S h.,~ a. ~ ~n S ..,._ ignature Fee: $1_ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE A Good Place to Live o,n ~IMem rc CITY OF MERIDLAN CHARLES ROUNTREE 33 EAST IDAHO GLENN BENTLEY MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 RON ANDERSON Phone (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 KEITH BIRD FACSIMILE COVER SHEET LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) ss4-4w4 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. (208)884-5533 FAX NUMBER: Z~~ ~ 2 ~~ ~ DATE: 7_6- ~~ TO: ~~1~~?/~-a y TITLE/DEPARTMENT: ~~~" '"e vI CONFIDENTIAL: YES TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) NO ~~ FROM: CITY OF MERIDIAN - FAX NUMBER: (208) 888-4218 NAME: ~! `~ ~ ~ ~9 e TITLE/DEPARTMENT: ~! L;~~ COMMENTS: ~l ~ ~ G~L 7~ CE`''O {i,' ~c=~ c~.e_ C'P~-~, PLEASE CALL US IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLY (208) 888-4433. ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT ** AS OF JUL 06 '99 15 32 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 11 07/06 15 27 2882501 MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS EC--S 05'17" 016 082 OK HUB OF TREASURE Vqu,EY Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE A Good Placo to Lime LfCAL pEPARTMENT Council Memhrrc CITY OF MERIDIAN U9LIC8WORK P S CHARLES ROUNTREE 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT GLENN BENTLEY MERIDIAN, IpAFIO 83642 1208) 887.221 I RON ANDERSON Phone (208) 888-4d~3 • Fax (208) 687813 PLANNING AND ZUNINC KEITH BIRD DEPARTMENT (208)98~•i533 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET FAX NUMBER: ~~~ "~ Z ~~ ~ DATE: 7-6~ ~~ TO: ~/l~ ~?~~'Qy ^b TITLE/DEPARTMENT: ~~~"r`wI CONFIDENTIAL: YES NO TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): ~~ FROM; CITY OF MERIDIAN - FAX NUMBER: (208) 888-4218 NAME: ~%l( ~ ~ TITLE/DEPARTMENT: ~~ r!~~ COMMENTS: ~L ~ ~ G~L ~ ~~~~~ ~' @ /'302 ~, ~.r;~ - 2~~~,~-.c c~.~-- PLEASE CALL US IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLY (208) 888-4433.