Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Charter High School AZ 98-105
~.r f ` ~ ' i ;~: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~ Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 884-4264 Et CITY OF MERIDIAN Council Members PUBLIC WORKS CHARLES ROUNTREE 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT GLENN BENTLEY MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 RON ANDERSON Phone (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT KEITH BIRD (208) 884-5533 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and `recommendations will be considered by the M~ ridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: February 2, 1999 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 5, 1999 HEARING DATE: February 9, 1999 FILE NUMBER: AZ-98-105 ~ REQUEST: ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY: MERIDIAN JOINT SCHIOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: East side of Locust Grove Road, between Ustick and McMillan Road lust North of Summerfield Sub TAMMY DE WEERD P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MARK NELSON, P/Z BYRON SMITH, P/Z KEITH BORUP, P/Z-. ROBERT`CORRIE; MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT _POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER _CITY PLANNER CITY FILES MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FIN kL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM &'FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ADA COUNTY (ANNEXATION) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: For Accountable Mail ~ ,. r~ w J Ui 1 ~A 1 W N 1 1` 1 O f0 Oo V O CJl .P N 1 r 'm Q ~Z cn a 3 Q~ 1/~ ~ ~~ .. 1D y °' ° J ~ J r ~ v \ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ O ~ ~ cD Q _ ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ w ~ o ~ ~ ~ W Y r--~ ~ Vii /~ ~ `~+ ~ ~ ~ O r' ~ ~ A d ~y ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~-+ N x O (7] w ~ ~ " C w ~ ~ ~ ~ ON ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~_ ®~. '"~ <~ Z _`~. ~~ cn "~ -c to L' ~or U r~- r~ O Ro z cn ~+ ro~ ~ a "'C ~ ~ O ~ ~ O '~~ to Z z cn n za O .C7 z w Z' z~ "~ y° ~yy YC" ~y7~ y ~ d 0y ~~ C" d ~ R° ~ C y ~r ~H~ x Oa Or'' ,yz ~ ~ 0,.~ ~ p1 ~O ~~ o ~ ~ . da ~ dro ~ ~ ~ dz ~° ~ o c dd d~ ~~' ~~ ~ ~a ~~ ~'m ~~ ~, ~ ~ mN tri ~., tr1Y v,~ y~ rlG~ t l~ ~ "C Z 1~7~ t~ Ht`~ H ~ n ~ j H z ~ ~i0 II l~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ] y M' y, y 1~ ~ / ~ " O ~ ~ ~ y ` l Q O ~ 4 ~-I lid y r-I ~ ] Ly l O ~ z z ~ ~ 1 y~ yj / ~ ~"3 l l ~ y /r " y ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ O C '~ O ~ ~ ~ ~f O [ j...j y y `y! ~ .^. ~ ~ F1w~11 ~ ~ ~v y [l~,l`~f, ~:y ~ /- S f ' ~ VV F1[~1~y1 , F;y W~ (y ~y / ~ ~ ~.y i ~ .~f ~ 1 1f z V ~ o j.iy W /L ~ FV 1 V I Y V l ' FI Jy l1J ~ z ~ ~ y Z a z ~ ~ `~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F'I Iy~~nyl ~ l`l -1 .. y y F-1 m oo ~ CJ d Cr1 o C7 ti7 d w Y d " O w w ~ tr1 p w t 00 w 0o w ~ ~ p~ ~ y W ~ pZj ? ~ ~ Z A ~ ? ? Z V7-, N Z. a n: ~ N i N ~ r-~ N ~ . ~ ~ ~ N N ' ~ ~ c~ ~ a n ~, N C7 cn U c x d d w d m o ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ N ~ w cr ~ ~n ~ c~, O v, O w O w ~+ ~^^~' ~ ~3pa ~ - ~D O i ? ~ ? ~ A i O A 3.~~~O~m: N N N N a ~'roa C ~O CA N CA ~ CA ~' CA ~ a o. W ~ w-. ^^ ^3 ~ a ~ mho 70~. x _ cp cep ~ d ~ ~c ~mfD~ :D. m ~ o ~ 77 ° ~ ~ s~ -~ -mam a y - m ~m 3'~-0o"~`"w ~ m m o -cnw ~C)~3oQC N O°-' m 00 - - ~ n= ~~ ~~37 n, (p S a~osoom °'g 2 ~~. ~ a 3 m m-o ~ .<w.mQm~w m m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o m ' . . N a -, m e ~. ~ ~~ o ~ Cd. _ D c a N O. v~ Q U d p Smw~m~o _ -•n ~~ o Qmm~Q~m n ~ m~ ,(fin ~U~ _w rn~ f/1 ~ -su y m W w ~ p ~ ~ ~ O-ONyj DON ~ c ~ Q d O - 0 C "~ _ ~ ~ V _ W (D ~ M ~ f/1 ~ Nd~NfA 7 ~Y.~T O. m w om m°~~OO~ o ~ ~ amD. . ~ c c n m d3ac~ ~ - ~ c r.m 3 O O_~~ m --.x = ~~Q ~~~~~~ a. ~~ 3 ~ ~~ ~ ~d~ ~ d~3 x 'a ~ c N ~ ~. ~ 7 ~ ~ n o Sb O 7 WvO~~ ~d`wG ~ X w. N~ Q O??.N ~ O7"' <p O91 ~'OO E (D~ W ~'~y (D S O C fp ~~ O N N lD N ~ O ~N N~tO O Nx N NCA N O ~ QOd ~ I N . .N ~ C ~ n O O ~ 3. o° ~, c °. ~ In ~' ~,~~ ww-.~33 ~~°m~?'. m2 Cl N~ j ~ S ° ~ ~ ~ ~ m~Zo(D N, ~ N'O 7 ~ d N ~J ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~- W C x N ~ ~ p C ~ y ~ ~, -o~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 70 ~ N a N T ~ m p' > > x c ~p J N .. -O -~ N ///'~~~ ~. ~0.7N N~ ~i e 0 w V Q c m cep A 3 .y. a m n O w Q 3 O W d 0 3 For Accountable Mail ~ (n 'n ~ .-~ m~ ~ w j Ui ~ ? ~ W . N ~ s _. O O . W v O CJ7 .P N -+ C ~ ~ O Z '~"' D m cn a 3 ~ ,6c ~ N• cl _" ~V ~ ~ nwYU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'v/~t '`~/~Y, ~ (vet, ~ !v^( ~ ~ ~ "~I v ~ //~~, 0 ~l ~1 V J X . Z D _ -~7 V 11 C - w ^ ~ /~ ~ f~ (( ~~ A ~ 0 ? ~ w <~ Z 1i ro W [~y W +n .-~ y O~ ti" ~ ~ ro C/] O '.I,' ~ Cy D1 C/1 N [ W ~--i oo O ~ ,.~ OO ~ ti ~ Z ~j r ~. ~,-+i "' r N ~ CNii r~,~ N ~ N (~ C x+ U N 9 ~ r l.A C N '~ O O U ~ N ~-+ _O +'ya CA ~ ~ ~. v ~ .. ^~~ wQ ~m (~ ~ ~K a ~ Ci7~ ~ ~~ OO >Cx ~ Z d ~ ~ ~:~ r~ , ~ v~ c y ~ C7 r' a ~ z ~ rotn c~ ~~ ro~ ~ ~~ ro~ ~~ roH z ~~ CnW ~ rob roH ~ 3 N -=~ O~ ~ yy ~~ d °~c . ~~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~o d~ d~ d~ 9 ~~ ~ d '~ o ~~ N y u ~ ~ N~iy '~ ~ O~ry ~ y V v]s "'J ~ t7 ~ yO~ l n r~~y l+J ~ ~vy~n.I til F4 vy~~ lid ~ v~y~ l~l ~ G^O ~ ^- v~y~ lid ~ D Q r ~ d o,Ob h ~ y ,ro+lx ° c ~ d ~ ~ ~ r~ z r z rz z rx z ~'~ r z ee °~ ° d n ~ '~° ~ oo y y ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ zo z ~ ~ a ~ r d ~ m~ ~ ~ b ~ r~ ~~' ~ ~ O o ~r ~y ~ y ~, ~y ti z H y a ~ . dy ~~ d , ~ d ~ ~~ d° ~ ~ _ ~ a ~d ~d ~~ ~~ o ~ z z z ~ z' z d a z o ,. -~ ° ° z ` d o~ ~ e H ~ v . di d d d d o ~, ~ C ~ f ~ J z ~ O O ~ '~ ~ ~ W W W _ ~° W ~° ~ Z ~ F--i ~ ~ ~ ~'" ~ A t ? i ~ t A i N ~ h D m CI oo O\ ~ y 00 h n W o W n Cn l N N ` ~~p 3 ~. ~ N ~ i O0 O Z rn ~ .-. .-~ N cn N ~ -"~`- _ m n m' ~ w O 6 fp .n ~? - ~ ~-' A N ~ ~ ~~~m a a m '~ ~+ O. ~ ~ W Fr CA U ~ _ (D N d O ~ ~ m U ~ ° M ~ D3 ~ Q a O ~ x~_o~°_'. y ~ ~ (D ~' ~ ~ ~ N N T a N 'O ~ ~ Om C s~-oy"as w a v>~< m :- ~~1 ~ d _. __ ~n~ oQ~' m0°imom= n . ~ 7w ^~c~o ~ = ~~o~oom ~' 91 w 7 1. ~~L r ,'a ry~ ~ ~co m S 3 ~ T. . .y `< W o. ~ m .7 l c ~ N Ow o~ ~ ~ r~ ~~ ~ ~ fD wy o. y a Al fl.~ ~ ~~..n C j~ N 0 n O N N O ~ C C 7 Q O fD ~ N N O O O m Offlw W O n a w N O n O ' N _ » c ~wmo3 ~~ wN N T. o . ~~~~°OOO ~ fDa w~w3oo.m m om ~ Q `oao m-•m- in°cco~~. _ c ~ p amp Q~_. ~. ~ ~. N ~ n~ dm o. n (n y O .N+ v ~~°' no~w ~°3~~~- O~ O~ ~ oo~ N (n ~~ J j O ~~N~ ~ ~ SU O -" 3 ~ ~.~(D O W'O A 7 O wmmw T~ Q W N. fD D o~~ aQ?~ ~ w ~ w ~ ~O c wy ONN~Nm w~. ~~NX ~ T(!7 (D~ ~ QOd ~ ~N . 7 ~ N ~ ~ l7 pO. m _ ~D p ~ C7 (D ~ 3 O . c °~ T (A ~. wm X33 joo~~w m2 ~ , w m~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 viQ m wwmv~ = 3 70 o wy N<may~~' ~ m ~ . 'ow c~3 ~~ v 0 O c ~3 m W ~ wo-o ~ ~ N , w 7 7 X c A c "~ m 3 o (Op - f00.~N N`Z For .Accountable Mail i ~ r ~ ~ 1 Ut 1 -~ ~ J W N 1 1 ...L O O O v O U7 ~ N 1 r ~ 0 Z Na ~ 3 pp mm 7 `M `~ ~ V' V1 ° rya v ~,/ Ill - -rJ ~ m ~ L ~ G ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• -_ A ~ ~ b W i ~ W ~ O 01 00 00 00 ~] ~y ~1 Q m c ~ o 00 v ~ 'A ~ 01 oo ~ ~O ~ O "~C! o V i Q~ ~ ~ N ~' r O Z N ~ ~ U ~ O 00 ONO G~ !! ~~!! O ~~ m oo ac N tnd ~ ~~ ~a Cr t~ ~~ [r t~ ~y ~~ r~z ~ ~~ tnd ~ c~ t~ ~~ cy v t~ ~x ~~ ~ a ~ to ~ c to ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ tnz ~ co tn ~~ p Z y l O m Cy ~~f 1=1 ~ t~ri ~~J ~ 1~f (97 ~~J~-~ ~~j - ~ ~ M~~J ~ ~~f ~~H~yJ ~ ~~f ~j F~f ~~J (yj F~~ 1 'ro,~r' a I - - Y /r ~ h - / ~ M~1 r F--I ~ ~~~ 1-~I M ~ I / I - - 1 ~ I - l F - 1 I -- I F - ~ O v F~ 1 y FPM ~ ~ . y V I-~'1_ ~ ~ y V llZ' 1--1 _ ~ \ . / ~/-y~' lllr V Y/'-~1 ?'7p'! V ~ ~ . { /V~ ~ ~ ~ . y /V~ ~ p"~ a ~ y /V~ ~ . y /V~ ~ y /V- ~ . y V ~ ~ ~ y lam/ V` !D ~~ 4, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ . y 4.1I F. ~ Orl1 fl.+,I I ~~.I~y! t"1'~ ~.1yI ~ m y `l, ~.1y+ ~.1y/ ~ FL~l i1 / ~ y y V.1yl /`i / ~ ~4~yi /~ \ l ~ ~ • ~ li/ F~y M ll"'t, ~ l~iy~ y~..yy FV.{ lly+yJ l~iy~ ~~.y 1Vy l~~y~ l~i~{ `~/y II~~~ l~iy~ 11..1 ~.Vy l ~ l~+yi uro FV~{ ~ l~iy~ tVy ` ~ N \~iy~ FVy ... yl~iy~ 1Vy l~iy~ -V~y l~iy~ ~"C yVy ~ ..' li/ y 1~ya ~ T ~ d ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~o o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d d d ti d d d d ~ d d d dr r o o ~' a ~ a a a a ~ a ~ a a a aa~ a Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z d Z Z Z Z ~, Z D ~ ~ m N ~ ~-. d i--~ ~--~ d i--i ~ d rti _ d ~ d i--i d i--i d W ~ d ~ d ~ d ~--~ xi d 1--i d d m n $ ~ w ~ °° w w w w w O o v ~ w w w w w `~ ^^^^a c, 4' o, c~ o, o, c. ~ W o, c, a~ a\ o, o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 O ~ q ? .N A ~ N A N ? N ? N ~ N A N ? N A N ? N A N .P N ~~ccfl °--' 0 ~ ~ ~. cis N . ~~~ , n °- m a . . d ~ lp U a ~ o < m ~'d, ~ ^0 0~ 0 0 ~~ N -~ ~ , m ~ N <D ~. CiI '~ C~ N N N O S 7J 1 ~ ~ ~ ,r~~ UL i ~ ~7 d N 3 N __ a (n"o ~ +O '+~ ~, o m ~ ON 03y-O ~ ~ ~'o N S /.~ ~ `~ - ~ ~° (~w oQ~' = m (~ ^031 C7 p j - om N O- v 0 300 fD 3w ~O_ N 3 < <~. n ~ .D ~ N N'O A ~°~'~a~m~ ~~ (/1 o ~ ~ N ri ~p7N N~'OO ANC .n OO -D ... N QU ~ ~N ~ 3 O 0 7 C N N 0~ ~~o Cw ~~ < m y w a v N - mmwQ fu N O A T' N m m ~ ~ fA c ~ c - Ai N N (D c ~ ~ °-~~~'oo`~ 6 w m o o c S N y~ 3. ~ N ~ N N ~ O n- mo- fOn ~ 0 S~ O O c N (D N 111 ~ O EA =. ~ y ~ ~ Q O- G O m d o~ Nom~oo3 c c on m _ ~ c ~ u,~y p a~~ ~ ,~~~ . ~~ 3 ~ o~oO~Na - pQ ~vv ~ ~m3 N (/1717 7 N t 11 OOS o`°~7mmm . ~ -°.3m °`.' m m Q Nw.m w m ' °w~ x oow~ao T~ m• m31 O o~ tb ~y N E (D S O C t0 ~ N N N O NNN ~ p N(A O QO ~. ~ ~ ~ o ~.~ d. ~; m m O ~ y ~ o3~~D ~ 3. o _. c o- ~ (n ~ ~. wa+~.~33 ?°o`D?w m2 ^. ~ ~ 3 d N ~ 7 ~ '1 3°~i~om w n ma ~ 3 - 37 • <m~~d m ~may~x. -ow~Q~3 ~ m `~ ~'mm'mo- p'> m ~ >xc~p a ~ "'-o w 3 ~ fea~~m,7 For Accountable Mail r~ J i 1 1 1 r M Z D Ul ~ W N ~ .. O CO 00 V p . CJl ~ N 1 ~ NO . ~„ ^ vQ N ~~a c ~~ m v ~~ ~ ~ ~~ co ~: 3 ~ ° m N ~ ~ ~~ ~ m ~ ~ K '` ~ ~ ~ 4 , ~ n.. m~c a3 ... C F-+ Gr Cr]~ O\ [r N C17 rrln D\ C z Hl~ mil" ~° ~~ ~~c ~o ~~ ~~ oz o °~ H b ay a _ ~z ~~ ~o N da dr ~~ ~z ~ c o d° d~ dc Q M z N d d oo .~,, o Y Y ~' (7 z z z ~ D N Od 00 N 3 N N D~~ m ~ ~ ~ , amp C Q a ~" O f ~ - o0 0~ ~ x~~~°~ N ~ ~~~ w~ ~p ~, w N rnm 30 3~ w ~- ~ w J - N (D - a O. -. "O O N ~~v°3Nws w a-0i en~ m ~ Sj . ~ o v. w ~, mom= 0 ~ ~ s ^~ m ?' (1 ST ~w c D `~ w.m am m w _ ~ r ~ m~ ° ~ ~ w ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 0 N ~o ~ A ,rj ~ f /»l Q ~ O~¢ty~~0 ~ y w ~~ ~~~_~~< Cll b\~ ~< ?~ N w i amm~Q~~ -. Ny ~ r. A 3 (D ?y ~ ~ nON 0 J O C j 6 y O. p N O O ~ t» w ~' n w N O n 3~N O~ J C~ N 7 N ~y w N ~ O y ^' O m a _ C n y '~m w - o ~w w~_3oQ= w omQ Nx'OO.O ~ 0 ' D 30o m ~ ~ c on ~ ~ am ~ ~ c ~.~~.m~~' ncn Q~ ~ o~~ dcoaOJw owov,J ° _ pm ~ ~ ~ ~ww ~ °-'m3 3~~a ~ N J ~ x oo~ N ~J~ O ~~ N a ry ~ ~ p ~ O ~~ ~ O O W~ n ~ ~ T~ Q N N.N ~ w~~ X~ wJw~ao ~ fD ' w7o O O 7 Sb -^~y aQS~J w w ~D spy N minmw N ~ y wNN3 N .. TUJ ~ QO O. 7 ~. N x. w y' W O ~ - N J ~ ~~ O w C7 _ . ~ 3.o3.c °- ~p) .0. j°o`Djm_ y ~ w ~ ~-i ~ ~ N ~ ~ w w.o my J ~ ~ w w " 31 ~ y ~w ~~3 0 ~~ympc -oJ~ w - 7 7 w J J~ x N T w > j K c ~ a~"~m3 ~ fC O.SN N`~ ~ ' T 0 W v V m 6 C N 0 3 Ny Q a Q 1. r n Nc~lc TX CONFIIS,N:,~REPORT "~li?ii~~a~•+ •"• ,°~~,r .~ +a~ra•r.+ra!!~±a~:~'°°„~y /Jf AS OF MAR 15 '99y10~34 PAGE.01 ~, _.. , ` r ~"°°~~ _. ~` ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN ~' ~~ .. ,,, DATE TIME TOiFROM MODE MINiSEC PGS CMD# STATUS 04 03115 10 34 208 888 1097 EC--S 00'31" 001 174 OK ~- NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on April 6, 1999, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Meridian Joint School District No. 2 for annexation and zoning of approximately 40.55 acres of land which is generally located east sid® of Locust Grove Road, between Ustick and McMillan Road just north of Summerfield Subdivision. The application requests a zone of R-4. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 15~' day of Match, 1999. ILLIAM G. BERG, JR., ERK ~4„I~:1FIIrr~ tip " PUBLISH March 17 and 31, 1999. ``\~.~~~-S ~,~ j~""'~, ,~ z~ ~~. ~o - $I.+ ~: ~ "fir 1~ • ~t """"~~Iaei lil~y~i~~ ~~ ~„ ~ . NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on April 6, 1999, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Meridian Joint School District No. 2 for annexation and zoning of approximately 40.55 acres of land which is generally located east side of Locust Grove Road, between Ustick and McMillan Road just north of Summerfield Subdivision. The application requests a zone of R-4. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shah be heard at said public hearing and the public is.welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 15th day of March, 1999. ILLIAM G. BERG, JR., ERK ,~~.#11 litilJp}1~~, PUBLISH March 17 and 31, 1999. ~,**~'~;~- ~~.~~` ~~~ ~°'-f ~~ _ ~~~ ',~,~~~~~fff43y9 YiIT#Y#E# -~~~~~~~101~~~1~~~ ~ ---~ ~ ~ _ _ ~, ~; ~\y~ _~ r~~. 1 "'~ ~ ' C' y ~ ~ N ~ 1 ° m ~~ ~ ~ ~1~,,,1~ ~ t0 O , ~ ~ <~ m'. ~ ~; .. w n ~ ~ ~ ° / ~ ~: . \ j ~ N. SI~MMtRSID~ WY' ,\ ~ b i o ~ w \~ o p ~\' :.l G ~._. _ ~ ~~1}r_ p ~ c. N •C m ~'~ C1 r- ~r O % co ~'~'1 s ~2r o ~ - N o .~-- ~ a N ~ ~ m ro N _ ' .p \ fTl 4 n. N G _ ERFl4RY. AV. 3 .~ c+ m a M Ih _.1 O m v ~„ o V a . WY o ~ -. o l ~ n 4 ~^ r~ `~ ,, _ ~r z 8 ~- 0 z 0 N..__ !, ~ ` . l . _ _ ... _.._~ Y 1 ~j ~x x~ `•` iT~ _ __ _ ~ ~ A a ~ , _ . _ ~ 1 W ' 11 "~ ~ y, _- -._ ~ '. ~ ..1 M ~ ~ ~ ~ ,\ I ` _ - -- n ~ ~ -- I ; l J _ / ~ .. -- ~ . _. . ~ l -- ----J. v ~ ~. ~ :i l __~_ ~ i I ~; ~' -~ `~ - ? i \ ~ ~ J / _. __ --- - ------- - a/ . ^' ~_ ~ ~ ~ i ad 4' - . ~ -- ~ ~; ' ,, ,, ' A, __ ', .__._ . - _ - ~~ ~~ ~- - 1 A5'i .s . i ~* a?L.3 ..... .._ vY a NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant`to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on February 9, 1999, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of 11Jleridiar~ Joint School District No. 2 for annexation and zoning of approximately 40.55 acres of land which is generally located east side of Locust Grove Road, between Ustick and McMillan Road just north of Summerfield Subdivision. The application requests a zone of R-4. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's ofFce at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 12th of January, 1999. PUBLISH January 20 & February 3, 1999 j "~ -_.; WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., C ERK r .,~ ~r ~Q '~ ~. $ L r ,: ~ ~.. '. T ~» .~ ~~. w, ** TX CONFIRMAII!~V REPORT ** DATE TIME TOiFROM 08 01115 09:02 208 888 109? AS OF JAN 15 '09:02 / PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MINiSEC PGS CMD#t STATUS EC--S 00'30" 001 011 OK NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant fo the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Panning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on February 9, 1999, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Meridian Joint School District No. 2 for annexation and zoning of approximately 40.55 acres of land which is generally located east side of Locust Grove Road, between Ustick and McMillan Road just north of Summerfield Subdivision.. The application requests a zone of R-4. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 12"' of January, 1999. PUBLISH January 20 8~ February 3, 1999. '~ ., WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., C ERK .a ',. ''~ sue., For. Accountable~Mail a~ 0 w . ,~ N 6 ' C Al . ~ 3 0 c .Nr N O a w <D a a ~G H ~; ~. W O1 O .~.. r~ N ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ J W J 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - (I.~ ~ N ..,1 r ~ 0 Z~.: M Q 3r. az ._._, .~~ rt ~ ~ ?n,~- ay m~ ~ a o ~ ~. W~~ - m ~ ~ ~ _ (~ w D c ~ ~ ,~, _ Q ~l ~ ~ `q, ~ m 1 ~ ~ s (v ~ ~ f ` ~11 ~ ~ ^ 1 . N N O ~ w •~ 00 ~" ~ 1 "~ r+ ~l ~ A t'rJ O r r+ Crf ~C d ~-+ 00 ~ r-+ ('1. ~p r N r-+ ~ N ~--~ N Q N O N O W O~ W ~l A WSJ O [ ? O d W m - <z o ~ w cn b ~n cnC ~C~ .-~ ~ cn~, CS] ,..+ oRo z .A v,rC' "Cy ~ c~C7 "d'~' o v~~-C rCZ JI o "C~ w w "i7 ~D o b O o b a cn a cn N oGa ~ cn Y wz W' ~ . ~~ ~°~ a ~ ar"' ~~ y ~ a~ Q rr oa ~ ~~ ~~ r t7 ~~ YZ ~~ Fc~ r~~ a ~ Y y Z r ° Z r °` 7. tdz r~ Z~['1 r., °~ ~ ~t W -e ~~ N~ d dR° R° ~ nC d'~ ~R° C7""3 d~.., rG d d ° ' C ~ ~ b y d ~ " G7 ~-+ ~ ("~y C o ~~ n ~y C/1 Ci7 C/1 t'17~ ~~ ~ ~-3~' ~ ~ ~ ITJG~ ~ CrJCrJ f/~ Cn~ C/1 C17`~ ~ ~~- z Cf] trJ C/) t=i ~ ~ C/) H x ~~ ~ y~ D a l~~i ~ Z Z,.~ rz 7y Z"~ ZC Zn zO Zy Z Z ',C1 7d ~ac] 7.7£v° N _ ~~~ ,,,j o. ~ ~z ~x y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ d ~ ~ ~' ~' t~~ ~rtdn ~_ ~'C= d d~ ~~ ~y 17 C7 t7 d d d ~ ~ OZ ~n m ~~ ~ z zz ar " ~~' z z~ z z z z z ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~' ~ m ~ .. ~ d V z ~' y .. d .. z d ,. d d d .. d ~--~ 7~ . ~ o m o0 ~ d d ~ 0 0 d 00 d d. ~ d y o ~ ~ 0 o W oo ~-. ~ ~ o rn 0 rn 00 ~ 00 ~ ~ . 00 ~ W oo W ~ a ~-.+ a w - O~ ~., ~ a ~ . m -~ Z ~ ~ W ~~-, A A ? ~ A , p ? i O +~ Z Z N Z b N N ~ 1~1..yI N N N N N N N ~~.y ~1..-~ ~ ~Y-.-II a ~ U C.n N V U U U U i ~ V V W V y ~ N ~ th N Cn cIl ~ w N ~p t l~ N ~O i V N ~O w O Ch N `J i V W O t 1i W O Oo W 00 . W C DD - W ~' ~a C7 3~ S ~ ~ N O'~ ~ Q~ ~ 01 C~ m p to m ~ ~ N N N N ~ m a '~ Cn Cn ~ VU Cl~ Vl V1 Vi Ch 0- N N ~' cq m N w ~+ ... .--. ..r .-~ ~ o ~ ~3 ~ o ~ - c `~ m ma m 7D ~ ~ L ~ N O ~ '~• N, (D ~ N =o.a,o` ~ ~ / ti1~ ~~ m m O m m s~v ` m~ w a _. ??. e»~ m N D-m Om = ('~' V ~d N 3 n J ` fa' n ~w.w~m~w q~mp~ O h ~ , m~ ~ s ~ ~c o ~ N r a ~mcfDm~~ s~vN"=~ py -D ~~ ~ N Q~ ° ~ ~~ mmwacv S _y ~ - Pi »'mo`»ofD m ~n mo c ~ aj Nao c='O~~» v m o Cam"/ n _ ~dmo3.~ ~ 5. < m ~p v ~ ~'3 oQw mam3oao m~~ ocN ° mny o~ a~X 3 m ~ ~~`D" n~ 3 ~ww c o oa ~m ~03~~0. pm ~a ~ ~.. x'oo~ N ~ ~. '. 7 ~ o~,2m~m ~ SU ~ 3 ~ -°.3m w-o ~ ~ d N w m ~ ~d~iDx= m o m~ . D o~^ - " o~ ~a mmyw _ m~ m_ _ ~nN m ?~~ ~~ 41 O N N d ~f~ (D fn ~ Q O a ^ ~~cc„3a_. m m~ //' ~ ~~ 'D3o°3~iQ _.o_.~ m~ m.~~ a wd ~~3 mS w~',~~~.i 3 ° y~o m v1 (~ /h ~ o ~» ~ ~w ~o:c ~ y ~ . . -0~3 (D T N fft N p_ fQ d7N (D `~ For Accountable Mail .D 0 3 W V 6 C At y ~ cow U7 ~. W -+ O CD 00 ~l O U7 W N 1 ~ ~ -~* D pZj `" U1 Q 3, ~ a ~h ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ cD a.ID ~-~ 7 y ~ \ V ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ Z\ ~ c , 1 w ~ ~) ~ ~ f'D (n air ~ ~+'' --~11 • Z ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~~ ~e W W ~W ~ ~ e~GV ~ ~' ~`~` ~ y ~~ ~ o W b TI'1 ~ iyi ~ b W O x ..+ ~ i/1 N ~"' N ~ ti 01 ' J O A ~ c.r O ~-+ ,A ~,. p ~." w-+ ~ N N tr W O o-N+ r-+ N ~ O O O~ ~ N !-~ O~ r "' V ~p bV ~~~ ~'~ as w Ca OO ~ tn~ ~ ~.., 00 w z~ o z~, o ~ tn~ ~ zH o R,o zd r ~dC cn b v, b c~ b cn '-dy c~ ~ t~t„ v. y ~vy ~ ~ ° ~~ ~.~ ~d d ~ O~ y ~~ 0 R° ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~~ ~~ ~~® ~ o ~„3~ ~RP ~ N~ O~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~W ~ d d d ~ C7~ ~b ~ ~ d y ~ ~ ~ ~y ~~ ~ ~r ~d y~ ~d a ar y~ r~ r~ r~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~r ~ ~~ ~ d~' ~° ~x ~'z 6~ zd ~'z ~ r r r rx r~~ rr~ ~C~ dd m~ ~~ ~~ oo ~ ~y o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ zo ~z ~~ 7 ~ . ~ t a o ~y ° ~'~ ~ ~~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~~ ®~~p o N ~ ~ Q wr ~ ~~ ~y d ~y ~y C~ d d d d ~~ d0 ~ - r~ y , a k° ~d ~~ ~~ a ~° P az z z z z ~ z ~ ~+ ~ ~ ~ z a N ~ ~ zF ,< d Q ~ o9 ~ ~ d z ~ ~y d d d d d z d o z ~'~ ~' W d d~ W W W W W d W ~ ~ ~ ~ C7 0 O n Z - ? N W ~ Y W z A ~P ~n ~ ~P ~ ~A. D ~ 6o ~ . -~ Y ~,,,+ CA N ~"~ N N t N N N i ~ N n a m w ~'" d d to o fJ~ cn n N c O ~ y d ~--~ OD vi w ~ cr w to w c~ w to w vi N ~ `~' to N y `~ ~~n o~ pm m w cp .., N N amp w N U a ~ ~, O w uu ~3 O _ ~ `G ~ N I N J7~C: N j N O j ~ . D ~ °-'mo.m -~--~~ " om ~:v v,Km n~i o . ~ ~N 3'O6= OON BOO ~ ~~T '~ n= ~Q ^ C^C ~ (Q W ~ . v3mwa m ~ ~ c0 G _ n ~ ~ ~w.wQm~ > ~ ~ - c~ m o N 5 o W > y a, ~ . `~m~ycDC~i~ ~ SmmSm~ +~~ 1 =D „~ a N ti ~~ o w 1~ o ~~~~~4~ m. m w v c w 999 ~ < w ' 0 ~ ~ w. ~+ = pi a. ~- wuJ, ~~~N .~. N CD O N a ~ _ _ NC (D c N w C Q, y SO J c Novaw ~~ w (D O n C1 sw.y°a~co ~ , wm c o ~ o. ai ~ ~~~ o o ~mw ~ v m m a c nw -o ww,.~oo~a ~ m n i~o o o o N ~ ~ C O c7 ~ ~ wpb ~ O. fD ~, -w ~ c ~ o ~ .:m n y °--~~x ~ mw w k j 00 ~Na N 3 ~Q ~ ~ co3 ~J~j= g m,7 m m m ~ ~ ~~~ ~ -°. 3 w w-o~ 3 °w~cDx»' w o' m~ 4 `Dwm O o~' wc ..~v mmy°3' m7D Al ~~; m ~o~ ~~ N _ N ~ N ~ o~ w3~. ~ ~(n m~ ~ van ~ jocN~Q a ~ ~ _ o°~n1 ~3 °- T~ n . ~ .o_.c wy..,~~3 m2 ~ ....7 ?oo~=.y. ~„~t ~ -. ~.T' ~ ~ N ~ Q N N 0 N~ ~ ~ 3I A C/~ N SJ C/ ' 1 o. w C x. (/~ ~w~g»~ ~rnwmoc (D 3 w ~ d ~ do_'oJ~ J N J J~ ~ N T ~ ~ m y a w 7 J x C (p a i ~ ~ N N fp o. S fn 0 C N O 3 Q K 7 x O d O For Accountable Mail -~ 0 w V V T m 6 C N O 3 C fp N n O '8 .~i ~. a 7 ~O W d O 7 'N 7 r~ ~-• ~ w `.... ~ 1 A 1 W ~ -+ .~ O CO 00 ~l O Cfl W N ~ C ~ O Z N Q~ 1, ~` ~ ~ v ' 3 3 ~ C)J W ~, ~. .l) ~ ~ ..~, ~ w ~ w of ~o p ~ ~ ~ o~ tom'' ~ ['_' ~ ~ O~ ~ ` ' ~ ~1 ~1 O r - ~ ro ~ ~ V`~ 1 w ~ ~ m W ~ ~, m - O ~" oo Oo ~ J w "" ~ ~ O~ ~ v ~D O ~ c.n ~ ~ r' O Uj ~ cn o0 a, x 00 .P 0 0o ~ ~' v N L-y v 0 "'` W '11 ~,. <Z ~ O~ ~~_ ~ ~ o~ 0 ~ ~ ~ z ~, ~ ~, ~ ~~ O o~ ~ '~ Sa 'j o 7 a ~ ..~ ~ a3 ?:~ >C trit7 cn ~y tn t~i v~R° tr1 v~"j tr1z ~ C7 R~ d x Y ~ Cn '~d trl~ ~H Ci7 zn'~ Cr z ro Ci ~R° z ~® ~~"'ri ~, o N ~ ~~ v~ xr xr x ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ o x xo ~~ ~ c cy to a-~. ~y € °~ o ~r ~~ a ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~~ y ~~ ~ O y ~ ~ ~n ~~ o ~y ~b ~ em ~~ dd ~ . y ~ n r r ~ r ~ o y O p~°~ x~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~r y ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~y ~ ~z .y aernC b oc dr d dz da °r dx y ~ ~ d d d d~ dr~ O~> r r~ ~ r~ r~ m r~ b ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r y p ~ d ~, r dr~ x rr~ y d r d ~ G r ~ d d r da ~ r o r `d a '~ dz ~ '~7y ~7d z 7y ~, 7y ,~ ~ N 7, ~ 7d a 70 7d'7y ~ 3 ~ ~ Z '~'~ ~.'~ 7d z ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ 7 C - ~i y d ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O p ~ t ~ ~ ~ y F .~y ~{t ~ `~ l ~ ryy ! ~ ryy F--1 F ~~{ FA /y ~y F~ ~ ~ ~ y Fry -~1 ~ y 1--1 y ~+ F~1 y ~.ry 1--I ~y / F~1 f0/ l ~ ~Q ~ Fri d / d-1 ~i d d Y d 1 d Ci7 d d d ~ d r+ d » o N ~ Z Z ~ 7 a 7 ~ 7 a z~ ~ d ~ Z ~ 7 a Z aw Z~ a Z D Z ~ A d ~ -, V d -. d -, d d r V d V . d d d Q d a jj 3. (p ~ .P 00 W ~ ~ 00 W 00 W OG W 00 W ~ N 00 W Oo W 00 W Oo b W DD W ti ~ O ~ a, A ,W ~ ~ ~ ? O~ ~ O~ A ~ ~P ~ ~A Q, ~ Q\ ~P O~ A d\ ~P 0\ ? . (7 ~ ~ n m p N m w ~ N N N N N N N ~N N N N N ~ p~ ~. ~p I G~ V~ + ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ ~3 'O ~ x~~m~. '° ~'~C y v N ~ ~ , ~D ~ N s v~ m { m 0_ ~- -p . ( p O (D y ~~a ~`~ v s ma `D w' ~ (D (D nm o c N O~ m o m c . :.. s w ~~ N s v~osoom f °'a ~ ~~.~ N ~w.w~mSN o~ .N.omm f ,. ~ ^ ~ a~ ry a fQ S 7 O O F m U ~ o ~ o_ wN~~o jOCm ` i55pp ~ OR ~+ ~ ` ~~ c~D< m ~ ~v A? ~ ~ d pOj y n n ~~ N _ ~p~~~~y ~ y C _ N ~ O d O O O N 7 ~ N w~ m ~ ~ ~ ; f, y O ~ m O c ~O=OC ~ ~d (D 0~,7m . J tL~ ,e ,~ ~ NN (D ~ O ~ ~ ~ m a N ~ ~ ~ ~ O O c (D N N 311 ~N yj _. ~ -07 W NNp~ °'m~w°o~- O. y 0 ~ ~ 00 ~ c y ~~ ~ m ~ N C1 am D O a~X 3a ~. t ii ~ mo~~?= m ~~9 ° - 03 ~ 70'x' ~ °-'m3 x' cc ' N ClI ?. ~ ~ 7 ~~ om,~ ~ ~ opt Sb o 7 ~ ~°.3m ~ ~wvn"~ ~N~~X~ T~ N' Q N?~.m O 00~' m O m ~a o: m °'O.3my N ~'J S31 ~co y CD ?o~ N N N ~ m ~ o N m ~ 3 ry ~ ~.NX. W. N' ~ Cn N ~ ~ O' O Q ~ ~ o m 3 ii3o ~ . c ~ °o3nm ~ ~ o c °~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~~ . _. jo.o~~m. m2 .~. ~ w m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°m~Zom w o m a~ 3 O l N w ~ ~~awcx ~~ymoc O 3 N O 1 mo=>>3 ~ ~ m ~'mm'wn d~'7xcm ~ .~- t y m m N ~ N ~~ ~ n3rn m~7 ~/ i For Accountable Mail r~ ~ J Ul 1 ~ ,1 w 1 ~ 1 o m OD v rn cn w N -` r Q d o a m a ' ~ ~ c ~ ~~~ ,+ m W V ~ ~Q a ~ '~ ~' a fD N.~,: ~ ~, v `~ ~ ~ • Z D T ~ n Y ~ C Q A 6 N ~ ry N z ~ w `~ W `° ~ ~ A A O ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ m .. O O ~(~" ~ N O~ O Z . ~ O ~" ~ ' ~ ni l~7~ H d ~ x'71 ~ m ~ ~ r" ~ C/] ~ ~ O O "C (}y N ~ ~ Q ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ y ~ ~ ~ da d oa~ ~ ~~ ~i ~ d° d~ d~ r rn ~ ~ ~ ~ m y ~"~ ~ ~C ~ o- o ~ Pa z°z 4 d z d d 3 ~ ` ~ ~ o ~ ~ _ a a W~ = z - z z ~ D Q ID ~ t-r N a n ~ o °° °° m ~~~~ G n N N ~.p$~~m `D ~D `. am a Q. ~ a M e m ~^ ~3 C 'a v X»o~w: 0 0 ° -mac C G ~ (O N ~ f7 7 o ~: `' m ~ ww CD N. (D ~ W ~ t 3 ~y 7 - ' _ N N p N ~ D ~» '~ " w s a w ~' ~~ ` ' ~ - ~ ~ o cnw~, mom= mO ~ w ~~N 3 p j - w ~°o~~~~ 199 ~ ~,a ~~~:~ ~ w.m ~ m ~w a~ m m~ m m ~ o ~ v w ~ Cn N N ~' N O ~(D o D .~. N a 'O ~ C .c ioJ O ~ SU N ~ J O .N.. ~ = T .~. o m » _ ~ -~ O ~ 3 3^ $c < C ~ mC y N _ w _ N D w N~ N n 0 0 w ° ~ C j- ( m o o~ -~ owoc»w» w m O ~ n ~~yg3~=_. ~~ ~ :o N ~05~00 - N(D N w ~~fA-~J a~w cnww wn~i v°om- ° a m vxoao N~~c°o~~ ~ p amp -v 3~ c ~ ~~_.m3- ~ ~.m y a~x. .N mc ono~w o°omov,J a p~ p~ a ~ Jwd ~ wm3 J_ 3 ~ c N ~ ~, , J ~ <D ~ o o~ G1 O ~ ocoQ'm~~ ~ B.3m wac'i 3 a yw m o ~~vwvo' m~ . O o~_ m ~ m 3J _ vi cD ~ ~o(nwwv~ N O N N ~ ~~ .. ~ (n y c (D ~ U O a ma Joc~Ni,3w~^ 9 w mp ~ - y ~ o c p ~"3o3~n ~~ n ~,~~ ~ ?~w~~33 0 > m ~' > w N~ J w ~ __ womo 3 w ~ (n ~ a N C x ~ 70 ~ N (1` X' . w3 3 p 1 ~. m .?'. o ~ 3 ~ ~'mmwa w~ J x c m n c "~O w 3 m m m O ~ n n , t0 ~.~N m~ • ~ REcE~~ DEC 2 2 1998 i ~E ~ I~ CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 East Idaho Street Meridian ID 83642 ~ MERIDIAN A C fi ,J ~ ~ ~ 5 ~~9~ , , . Phone: (208) 888-4433 L p 1~ 1;~G 8; ZONING Fax: (208) 887-4813 ~ ~ (~ City°of Meridian L~ City Clerk Office ~~.' 9g- LOS APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OR REZONE PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION: School Site Meridian Joint School District No. 2 GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Locust Grove Road Between Ustick and McMillan Road just North of Summerfield Subdivision. TYPE (RESIDENTIAL, INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL): Commercial -Educational ACRES OF LAND IN PROPOSED ANNEXATION: 40 + ~ ~'~ PRESENT LAND USE: Open land PROPOSED LAND USE: Charter High School PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT: Ada County - RT Zone PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: Meridian - R4 Zone APPLICANT: Meridian Joint School District No. 2 PHONE: $88-6701 ADDRESS: 911 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho 83642 ENGINEER, SURVEYOR, OR PLANNER: Leatham & Krohn Arch. PHONE: 336-3443 ADDRESS: 1735 Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83705 OWNER(S) OF RECORD: Meridian Joint School District No. 2 PHONE: 888-6701 ADDRESS: 911 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho 83642 S' ature pplicant - _ ,, ._. -. - r '9 .., r ,' ~. ^ ~- ' r i . _k > ~. ~ ~, .; ,. v ~ a. t .~ p < p .. - ..'.` ~' ~ .a /~ ~ ~,• .- ,.: ~, s. x ~ ~ ~ .. - x ti _, 1 , - .`' P ' ; ] :. ;ter • ` ~-, x Q f ~ . 'Y~k. .S'.~ E• .. -t' ~ Leatham ~& Krohn ~ .' ~ . ~..- ., .- s - f.. ,. Darrell Leatham, Architect t ,": ~ ~ `; ~ ~ ~ - Kent Krohn„Architect ~ „~ ~ " ~ ' - .. - , , . ' Wayne'Thowless Architect ' . _ " °_ ~ ~ ~ . ,~ , ", d Y _ ,. .~ December 22 - ~~ , 1.998= ` ~ ~ • „ .. r. . ,. ,. .. , ,. e .e , ,, A - .- . e m _ City ~'of Meridian _ ~ ~ - ~ _ - ~~~ ~ ~`~. - _ ' -33;East'ldaho Street. ~ . ~ - - rye" °- •, Meridian, Idaho 83642- - ' , _ - ~ - ~~ -~ ~ ~z • Ph.'~888-4433 - ~ - - ~ _ ., , ~, x u ~ , ;y Project.. ~ Applicati~on`for Annexation ~l ~~, ~~~" ~ _ ' :' - ~- . ~ - ~ ` , Meridian. Joint School Disfrict°No. 2. ', '~ ~ ~ G .. ~ w ~.. 'C.~ . ~ . V ,. , i 4 ~ .~Applicant:~ 'Me`ridian Joint School District No. 2~ - ,Y ' , , ~- - ., , . . • °91-1; Meridian:Street r3 ~ - - - :. ~~ ~ ~ ~ Meridiar, Idaho 83642` ' ~ '` ~ - 'P, ,- • " ~~ Ph. 888-6701 ~ ~ ~ _ , ;. .. ~, _ ,. _ .. - - ., , ` ,Fax: 888-6700 ..- r , ~ ... ,. - l.~r. K r .. . ~. :_ ,. ..~ , ', f ~ a F ~ ~ .. . Owner of Property, ~ Same,as above. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. _ n . _ .. ; , ,-- - , ~ ,. _ - ~ ,, ., ~ , ~ .,a _ Refer to `attachments ` for the•~followirig requested items: 1Narrarty deed, notarized .- ; ~ - '~ ~ •~ ., :. , .~ request for zcsning amendment;°. stamped legal°description,-zoning map; and a signed. :. ,. .~ . "affidavitfr`om,the Ownerlapplicart ~ - _ - ~,. , ,~ ' ;. - .: , _, ~- _ ~. , _. ~_ .< ~~ < ~ r _ fi - ~ - ~., - ~ . ~ w - , . The Meridian Joint School District No., 2 respectfully, submits this application far ,, =, ~~ . ~' _' 's Annexation and zoriing to the'City of Meridian: The.property is currently open` land and _~` ~° is located in Ada County,with~a'RTr(Rural Transitional) zoning designation:. The' ~ ;, > ~~ s ~: . ; 4 .$ r.p'roposed land use would be a new Meridian~Charter~Vocational Technical~High School - ,. _ ` viritfl~a proposed zoning. designation of• R4. . ' " ~ ~ - ` ,:.. ~ -, _ . y . u. ,, , y ,a The property-IS located on th`e~ east side" of;Locust.Grove`Road between'Ustick Road - , , ,rY.< and McMillan Road, with~the Summerfield Subdivision to tfiesouth; Heritage. ,. Subdlvision.to tlie` north, and undeveloped. land to the east`and .west.. The' SummerfieldAr ~ - Subdlvision is currently in the,City of Meridian:'°`Ceritennial, High School is located '=" ~ . -. t ~ approximately two (2) miles to'fhe east-of this site. _ Not `only will.studerts at Centennial :, ;° ~` "° benefit from the Vocational~Technical High~School but the present subdivisions located ~~ ~' ~" - :; ,, ~~y. .,adjacent to ana in the vicir'iity will also benefit:r"Meridian .schools -need to.be~located ini _ r ._ ... , . ~ . ~ ~areas.where they are compatible with adjacent uses and a residential subdivision which will utl)ize~~the new.facility would be the.most appropriate neighbor. ~ ~ ' . "' ;~' F: '. '•''' .-r ~ •~ ', ,. t ,,- _ ~ , 1 . . i } • 1C Y Y ti r t ,1735.Federal Way;~Boise; Idaho 83705 ~ `Phone~~(208) 336-3443- ~ - Fax~(208)~336-3680: ~ ~ " ~, _ ~, , .. Y- 1. .e _n ~ °' '-q t3 ~, ~'~ ~ ., # s ,. _ i ., v .4. ~ - _ ~:, r 1 , .. The-City of Meridian;;Comprefensive` Plank directly addresses the° issues of site`s _f ~~ ~c , ~ 5 ; ~'~~ ~ acquisition for.,public schools kiy stating' that, "school .sites~should,be reserved for future- ~ ',1 " ''' ` ~ : acquisition in> advance of development. of planned land use.: Approval of_ subdivision :~ " ~ _ . ,x plats~,may be:withheld if adequate chool facilities or sites:are not available o serve the ° "~~ Y, ,.. .. . ~~proposed subdivision." The Co,mprehensiveFPlan also`~state's,`'' because the quality;and- -~ .- " . - ~ ~ use of'educationalfacilities availableao~every group of citizens in the, community, . significantly affect the quality of `life in Meridian and the~area's~ ability to attract quality ~ ~° ` ,' '~~ ~ ,s t ,a- _ developmeht, and. because. quality education ~is an important~economic factor in the ~'=~ .area; ,they community, seeks to develop 'new school facilifies`and expand 'programs.as`~. ~ " ' ., , .. x . ,~ a .,• `~' -needed toserve community enrollment growth.. ~ The Comprehensive Plan'also ~r ~ addresses employment'goals byvstating that,,"Meridian will"achieve'"and su'pport's`.;.. ` _~ :. -` ' ~ business climate th~at'will offer,diverse~employment'opportunities to'~satisfy personal ' :. ~, " ` - , goals and economic needs.";This site and `school :answer all'of these goals`by locating°~ '_ ` ~~ ~ in;ar area that is expanding,;help improve~the quality of life in the'Meridian area, ,° . ~~ increase the`economy of the area by providing'quality work force that.will help"attract- ~~ ~~ ~ ` _ ~ ~,, more employment opportunities, which in turn.will help ,maintain low unemployment "' ~~, ~:~ T , ~ ° ''~a ~ _ . - .. ~_ _ ~ `~ ~~ _ - ~ ~ .1 Thank~you"for ~considering~~this.application`and if there-.-are any further~questionsplease~ `-~ s~- ~ _ do' not hesitate to contact us`~ - x, 3' ~ ~ ' _ _ . , ,. -.Sincerely; ~ ~~ , ~.. .. t ~ °~ .. > ~ ,. , ,, . ,, .. ~~ . , _ ~ ._ _ ~ _ ., ., ' ~~-, StillmamM. Ari'dersori, AIA~_ a. - `" > ~ _ > ~ - . ~~ ~ ~~~ r ~Leatham grid Krohn, ~Acchitects ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~- ' . _ Representing the Meridian'Joint~School District No: 2 ~ ~ - ; , ., - ... a .. ^. rt. , .K,. . . - ~ > dian Joint`School District. , ` ~ - r ~~ ~ ' ~ ;,~., . cc' ~ Jim Carberry -Men . . _ ,. :;~ < ~ c .. .. ' t .+ .. ,: - .~: < ; a ~ ~. ` r ... r .. n •' .' . x ~ ~ ;. r ~ r w .- > ~ , .. S r ~ '.~ .. e r,.t - ~ ~ ~ C ~~r. .. - ~ ~. < _ .~ s ~ - . :.,. . - .. r - ~ ~. .. >r .,. REQUESTYFOR ZONING AMENDMENT Date: December 4, 1998 Project: Application for Annexation and Zoning City of Meridian Applicant: Meridian Joint School District No. 2 Statement: The Meridian Joint School District No. 2, acting as owner of record on the property described on the attached Exhibit "A", requests a zoning. amendment from the Ada County zoning designation of RT to the City of Meridian zoning designation of TE. Jim Carberry Administrator of Support Programs Meridian Joint School District No. 2 State of Idaho County of Ada S.S. On this 11th day of December, in the year of 1998, before me, Marilyn D. Schug, a notary public, personally appeared Jim Carberry, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. ~.` ,, ~~, S. \ CJ _ Ki\ S !~ _ ~ f~, y ~A~~- ~~' ~ Notary Public ~ ~L fi.~ - ~ ,~, My Commission Expires March 27, 2003. ,'_ 1,w4 ._ ~ , ~ _~ ~~ ,r ~ f .. ;.,, 1~-•0198 Tt?E 11:J8 Fat P08 888 6700 )IERIDIaN SCHOOL DISTF.ICT ~00~ .. ~_ _ ~ ~ U {~/5~i its ~ D~/~ WARRANTY DEED FOR VALUE P~ECEIVED, HOLLISTER PROPERTIES L.P.; Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain., sell and convey unto JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, Grantee, whose address is 91i N. Meridian Road, Meridian, Idaho 836x2, that certain real property particularly described ir_ Exhibit A att.3ched hereto. ` TO HAVE P.ND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances, unto the said Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns forev~=r. The sai d Grantor does hereby _ covenant to and with the said Grantee that it is the owner in fee simple of said premises and that it is f~_ee and clear from all encumbrances, except as set forth above, i~ THAT IT WILtL WARRANT AND DE~'ENL the same from all lawful claims whatsoever, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO easements, restrictions, reservations, assessments and encumbrances of record, AN-D FUtZTHER. SUBJECT TO easements that' would be revealed by :a physical inspt~ction of said real property. IN WITN~~SS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto" executed this Warranty Deed this ,S~?.t- day of April, 1998. GRA1~T'I'OR HOLLISTER PROPERTIES L.P. Gene 1 Partner PENINSULA ' MAN EMENT COMPANY, an Idaho oration, James R. Hollister, President 12•'01.98 Tt'E 11:J9 Fd'i ~08 888 6100 ?IERIDI:~N SCHOOL DISTRICT 0]001 STATL OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this day of April, 2998, before rne, the undersigned Notary Pubi1C in and for said State, personally appeared-JAMES R_ HOLLISTER, ;tz:ow-n or identified to me to be the President of FENINSULA ~~.~AGEMEPdT COMPANY, which is the General Partner of F:CLLISTER PRO?ERTIES, LP. , and ack.-iowledged tc ~~~e that he executed the same for ucllister Properties, L.P. IN wITNE.~S w'P:EREOF, I have h t my hand and affixed my official seal the day° and in this c~'tific~t~firs above written. 1 //// ~,tpg94?Otge+I o ~ ``' ~ c ~ a a ~~~~~~ani ~~.~~`~ Residing at Metidiao, ID ~~O1sIIi ~P 1G/28/94 NOTARY PUB~IC,J~"tate of~`no Residing at B se My Commission Expires: r 1_':.01:9S TL'ii 11:J9 F:1Z ~OS SbS 6700 ?fERIDIaN SCHOOL DISTRICT [~]OU~! -. - -: =A PARCEL OF L.~ND~LOCATEO IN THE SOUTN4VEST QUARTER OF SECTIOPI 32, TOWINSHIP 4 ~IQRTH, , P,P.~lGE 1 E,^-,ST, ,OF THE oOIaE MERi03AN, ADA COUNTY, i0AH0, BEING -_ h10PF PARTICULA'LY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOYV$: CO~1h1ENCING AT 7~-IE Aj(~RTE-11+1(FST CORNEZ OF Ttlc SvliTi-i'rtiES i .uUAR T EK (','1EST 1 /4 CORNER.) OF SECTION 32, TO'.'/NSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST, BGISE MERIDIAN, THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 83 DEGREES 54'i0" EAST 1990.54 FEET i0 THE NORTHEr.ST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH"LEST Gt;?,RTER OF SnID SECTION 32; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 01'20" E45T 728.57 FcET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LIME OF SAID 4'1EST H4LF ; THENCE SOUTH 8~ DEGREES 48'44" 'NEST 604.48 FEkT TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH G DEGREES 00'57" Er1ST 225.95 FEET TO A POIDlT,; THENCc SOUTH-i 83 DEGREES 50'05" ~~IEST 1386.36 FEET TO A POINT ON T}iE '~/ES~T LINE OF SKID S;CTIODI 32; THENCE NORTH G DEGREES OO'11" WEST 957.12 FEET TO THE REAL PGINT OF HEGIN^lING OF T-fIS DESCRIPTION. EXCEPT ANY PORT?G"! LYING Vl?Tiilid TiiE RIGHT OF WAY FQR LOCUST GROVE ROAD. SliB3ECTp TC7 ";HE FGLI,OWING: 1. GENERAL TARE, FOR THE YEAR 1987, Wi-iICH ARE LIENS, OF WHICH ir{E FIRST !-iALF HAS BEEN PAID. THE SECOND HALF OF WNICN tYTLL NOT BECOME DELINflUENT UNTIL JUNG 20TH. 24pp2S06323~25405~~~~ AF"rECTS . 242S05323i5315 S8~7.7„ PARCEL Z 5357.04 PARCEL Ii . 2. GENERAL TAXES FOR THE YEAR 7998 , Wf-~ZCN ARE LIENS, ARE NOT YcT aUE ANG PAYABLE. . 3. • ANY, RIGHT., OR INTEREST IN A}~`l MINEa,AL, MIN!~RAL RIGHTS,- OR RELAT:D i~~ATTERS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIlNITED TO OIL,. CAS, COAL, AND OTHER HYOROC~$CNS . " 4. REAL PROPERTY TAXES N/HICti TriAY 8E ASSESSED, LE1lIED AND EXTENDED ON ANY "SUBSEQUENT AND/OFc OC%UPA,'VCY ROLL' WIT}! RESPECT TO I".1PRGVE~AENTS" COMPLETED ,DURING THE. YEAR WHICii ESCAPED ASSESSMENT ON THE REGULAR ASSESSMENT RO_L, WHICH ARE ltOT 'fET uUE AND PAYABLE. 5. LIENS AND ASSN:SSMENTS OF THE FOLLO~'fING DISTRICT A1~D 'tTiE RIGHTS AND POWERS THEREOF AS PROVIDED 8Y LAW. NO DELINQUENCIES APPEAR IN THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE. DISTRICT: SE1"LERS IRRICAI'ION DISTPICT (344-247.1} b. AN EASEMENT CC~NTAINZNG CERT;.IN TEi~AS, CONDITIONS aN0 PROVISIONS AFFECTING A PORTION ~OF SAID PRE'~ISES :~VD FGR TriE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN. FOR: JAMES R. NOLLISTER ~!tD fG;REN L. HOLLISTER, HUSBAND AND WIFE IN FAVOR OF: PARCEL II RECORDED: JUNE 28, 1991 INSTRUMENT NO.: 9135286 AFr=ECTS; COh1MENCING AT 7NE NORTH4`IEST COR;IER OF Ti-{E NORTH4vEST 1 J4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES OQ'11' EAST 44-:.12 Fcc"T TO TFiE REAL' PGINT OF BEGINNLVG OF THIS EASENEDIT. T'riENCE NORTH 83 DEGREES 50'05." EAST 1,327.00 FEET TO A PGINT CF CURVATURE; EYHIBIT A TO tidARFANTY DEED 1••01••93 TL'E 11:-10 F.a1 zoa h~A 600 )IERIDI:~` SCHOOL DISTRICT THENCE ALONG A CUR`JE TO THE RIGHT ig ~ F n ` N:+OIUS OF 35C~ , 0^v Fe'ET A CEIITRAL 6.5_ F_ET, S,1I~ CURVE HAVING A A,VGLE OF 81 DEG?EES 1 s' S3' , TANGENTS 0: 3U0.42 FEET , A~1D A CHORD OF 455 , 92 FEET N(HICH BEARS SOUiH 49 DEGREES 31 ' 2t"s" EAS T l0 A POIr{T OF REVEr.SE CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LE~i 15.95 FEET', SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 2C.00 FcE7,.A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45 OEGREcS 42'15', TA.t{GcNTS OF 8.43 FEET ANC A Ci-GP,D OF 15 .53 FE;T i{MICH BEAP.S SOUTH 31 DEGREES 44' 10' EAST TO A POIPJT OF REyERSE CURVATURE; TriENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT 126.31 FEET, SAID CCIRVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.60 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 144 DEGREES 44'09", TANGENTS _ CF 157.31 ANC A, CHORD OF 9.30 FEcT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 17 DEGREES 48'18° WEST TO A POINT; TNEi'1CE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 44'56" EAST 10.00 FEET TO A POINT; _ THENCE ALCNG 4 CURVE TO THE LErT 151.41 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A RAOIUS~OF 60.,00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 144 DEGREES 35'11', TANGENTS OF 187.93 FEET A,VD A CHORD OF 114.32 FEET WHICH BEARS PJORTH 17 DEGREES 42'18" EAST T~ A POI"iT CF REVERSc CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG .~, CURVE TO THE RIGN'T 7.98 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 10.0 FEET, A CENTP,AL ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES 42'15', TANGENTS OF 4.21 FEET A,VD A CHORD OF 7.77 FET WHICH BEARS NORTH 31 DEGREES 44'70' WEST TO A POIIJT OF REVEASE CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG ,~ CURVE TO THE LEF-'i 510.71 FEET) SAID CURVc' i~AVING A RADIUS OF 360.Od FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 81 DEGREES 16'53", T.vVGEt~fTS OF 309.00 FEE"" a.,VD A CHORD OF 468.95 FEET Wi-i_TCH BEARS NGRTH 4g GEGREES 3i'28" WEST TU A POINT OF TANGENCY; T'riENCE SOUTH E39 DEGREES 50'05" Y'fEST 1,326.97 FEET TO A, FOiNT 0"! THE NIEST LINE OF SAID SW 1/4; f THENCE SOUTH (l DEGREES 00'11' EAST 10.00 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF 1T{iS EASEMENT. 7. A.N. EASEMENT CGPJTALVING CERTAIN TEAMS, CONDITIONS AND PRGVISZONS AFFECTING A PORTION GF ;:AID PftENISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEnEiN. FOR: A RIGHT OF 'fJAY AND EASEMENT TC CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A GAS a DISTRIBUTION LINE _ IN FAVOR OF: I,N~f?FdOUNTIA,*1 GAS CC~tPANY ' RECORDED: DECE',~6Er~ 31, 1991 INSTRUh1ENT NO.: 9200739 _$. ,AN EASEMENT CONTAINING CERTAIN TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROViSIGNS'AFFECTING A PORTION OF SAID PRE:NISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN. ' FOR: IPJTERMOUNTIAN GAS COMPANY ZN FAVOR OF: A RIGHT OF WAY ANG EASEMENT ?0 CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAI~1 A GAS DISTRIBUTION LINE RECORGEG: JANUARY 6, 1992 INSTRUrdENT NO.: 9200740 9. SUBJECT TO RI;HTS OF 4YAY AS DISCLOSED BY AVAILABLE MAPS, FOR: NOURSE LaTER;;L LOCATION : NOP,~r;-;FpLY EGUOJDARY 10. SUBJECT TO TENANTS RIGHT OF POSSESSION. ~ 005 1~-01%98 TL"E 11:-10 FaY ?Ob 888 6?00, ~lERIDI:~N SCHOOL ,DI STRICT _ [~j006 ,, - ~-1J ~'~Ot~lcEt~ '1 4~1.~ EOtS~,,!r'~!i~ i~~~~° !S ~~i !,~42 580~5~s9 1 i :^ ~ ~- j AFFIDAVIT Date: Purpose: December 4, 1998 Application for Annexation and Zoning City of Meridian Statement: The Meridian Joint School district No. 2 states that the property described on the attached Exhibit "A" will be posted one (1) week prior to the public hearing on the above mentioned application. The posting will contain the name of the applicant, description of zoning amendment and the time, date, and location of the public hearing. The Meridian Joint School District No. 2 acting as the "Applicant" has read the contents of the above mentioned application and verifies that the information contained therein is true and correct. Jim Carberry Administrator of Support Programs Meridian Joint School District No. 2 St to of Idaho ) S.S. County of Ada On this 11th day of December, in the year of 1998, before me, Marilyn D. Schug, a notary public, personally appeared Jim Carberry, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. .S. ,~ q ~ ~ ~~~ ~ Notary Pu is °° ~ r ~. ~,~~` `~L~`~~'L~~,:x~. My Commission Expire on March 27, 2003. ;~ E~~"~.~~. s~ ., ~u<' ,.~,~~ ~. ~_ \ I ~~ ti ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f ~~ ~ ' i i I I- ~ ~ f s h - U p ~~ \ / ~ 1 ~~. O ~ V . N ~ ' ~ /` .. ~\ ~~ ~ ~ 11 '?S, N ~ '~~~ ~~ I b ~ ` ~ m'. f ~ ~ ~; ' ri ! ~/ D N. SI~MMtRS~~E WY. \ / / N (tl W N O ~ ~ la ~e J '~ ~ ~ ~ O N I y ~, C W -! ~ ~I I m T~ A 0 / ~ ~ / N - o _ / 1 ~ N N NO r, N u m p m ~ ~ ti _ ERF34R C Y. AV. ~ .~ u ~ h ~' '~ A ~~ Q m U w ~ I ~ s WY o _. _ o ~' ~ ~ ~~ it ~1 z 8 0 z 0 N __ 4 ao n b ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... -- -. -- r. ~O ~ *~ L~ _ ~, ~ . ~ ~ Z ~--`i x, - ---- - , ~ .r. ! ~ ` _ ~' ~ ~1 A ~'l v T ` ~ ~' ~ ,` "n m 1 r ~ J' ..` .. __ ~ .__.. / __ ________ __ ~r - ao f f - --- - ~ ~; .--.. ._... _._.». .._.. ~- - +~ V ._. _._ _ ~ v, .. / / ~ _ o ~ ~ ~ _ - - - ^ a~ ; ~. i. n ~_ ~ ~,; ., ' ~ ~_, ~ ,~. ~_ --- -~ , a, - ~~ _• DEC-14-1998 1628 FROf1 TO 3363680 P.02 • i . _ DESGRIPTION FOR JIM HOLLISTER SCHOOL PARCEL (PARCEL 1) . January 15, 1998 A parcel of land located in the SW % of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as foNows: Commencing at the NW comer of the SW % (West %< corner) of Section 32, T. 4N., R. 1 E_, B.M., the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Thence N 89°54'10" E 1990.54 feet to the NE corner of the W'/2 of the NE '/4 of the SW'/4 of said Section 32; Thence S 0°01'20" E 728.57 feet to a point on the east line of said W'/; Thence S' 89°48'44 W 604.48 feet to a point; Thence S 0°00'57" E 225.95 feet to a point; Thence S 89°50'05" W 1386.36 feet to a point on the west line of said Section 32; Thence N 0°00'11" 1111957.12 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. This parcel contains 40.55 Acres, mare or less, and is subject to all existing easements and rights-of-way_ Michael E. Marks, P.L.S. No. 4998 . i x,; 971241-legal-des _ O°~ZO m y o ,~~~ ~ m 37 -G Z ~, ~ ~ D ~ mD o CITY OF MERIDIAN `~,~ ~~ ~~~ ~'~ ~~ ~ ~ o z o ~ O "Hub of Treasure Valley" ~ k t~ ~,;~~ ` J n w a z z v 33 E. Idaho ~ Q- ~ _ o ~ o ~ Meridian, Idaho 83642 ,., - ~. ~ ~ ~ m zc~. ~ n 888-4433 ~ ~ rv m 1-~.I o r" Z Customer's ~_ ~ ~ ~ O (Order No. Date ~ ZZ-~~ ~ ~' ~ ~? (Name tJnj/1f ~.SCGIODI ~iSfi'~Cf /1/A• ~ oo > ~ Q,. ~ Address .- + rn r . o .: .w N•. ` L].: ~ . x . , ~ - _ ~ ~ _ . p - ~mtn ~ J >, r _ . ,~,~Ee2 g.OC.C o M : ~ ~~ , mZ z ~ 3. :. .. ~ ~. ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ... ~ Y ~ ~ i.1C z 4: ~ti•ti w ._ a ~.-.. . ~ ~ ~~ t~ _" + O o ~ . m > ~'- - `' ~ o ~ ff3 N \ ~ O ~ ~ ° ~ ~( D m z<, o ~ n _ \ ~ z `~ ~ ~ o "' ~ O .~t ~ c n '~ y :~ 1 ~ p N O n x 0 n O ,,~ ~ ~ N ~ m X N -i m CD I GS-202-2 PRINTED IN U.S.A. ~ Phone: i SOLD BY ~ CASH ~}~._(J(j~~ ~'HAR~/~ d~~~~. MDSE. RE7D. PAID OU7 ~~3j((F~- 4~~ L -_.. ~ ~lllU' ~S ias - - - ~ I on ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ 5a , ~ 5 i~ ~,~ ~~ ~~XZ l~I~ ~~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ I ~ I I 1 I I i #5v ~ ly10-32210 ~ I~ck-ho„S ~ i r~ - 3 Z2 1 '!~1l0 ~ ~lJtar~l~/i ~ ~ I All claims and'ieturned goods'MUS7'be accompanied by this bill. 0 0 0 913 2 TAX I Received Y TOTAL ~ 90 ~i Q 7 ,~j~ PflINTEO WITH ~C~ n ~J $UNINK, Jrylt^11,_l/~CU 6LU DEC~1~'"'98 13 26 FR PUBLIC WORhS 20888?129? TO 3363680 P.02r10 `! mttil~n~S ~ ~I.~o)x2= ~ 1103. ~9 ~~ •~ .wry--.-;~ ~. 3 .L 30pNT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 3a0' YOUNG DANIEL P & KLAUS- REBECCA L 4053 N LOCUST GROVE RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5511 QUENZER EUGENE & ARDYCE L 4020 N BLACK CAT R!7 BOISE ID 83642-5330 N LOCUST GROVE RD DONAHLTE MICHAEL A & BEVERLY A 3775 N LOCUST GROVE RA MERIDIAN ID 83842-5511 LEE HERBERT C & CYNTHIA A 3665 N LOCUST GROVE RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5511 BRICE HERBERT L & MARY L 2400 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5530 BEDARD RUSSELL A & DOLORES P 2090 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83842-5530 CASAD JOHN B & VIVIAN L 2233 FREEDOM LN IvIERIDIAN ID 83642-5527 MOORS MERLIN L & $ lOY 2170 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5530 STEINBACH CLYDE D 1905 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5529 MARTIN MICHAEL L ~ GENEVRA 1865 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5529 KNIGHT EDWARD W 1945 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5529 AUSMAN E L & D L TRUST AUSMAN E L 8z D L CO-TRUSTEES 4010 N LOCUST GROVE RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5523 SCHMELL RICHARD F & SUSAN M 1715 E PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5529 HANSEN ARVEL W JR 8c PATSY A 1755 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5529 ELLIOTT GARY C & LAURIE A 1835 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5529 r KNIGHT EDW 1945 P E LN ME AN ID 83642-5 29 BROWN MATT S & KATHLEEN A 1795 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5529 MOYER JAMES E & PEGGY A 2015 E PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5525 STEINBACH JOE M 2065 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5525 LOWS ALVIN R & EVELYN 2115 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5531 DEC 1~ '98 13=26 FR PUBLIC tdQRKS r w„ r TURNER CHARLES D & CHARLENE R 2345 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5531 CLAPP GEORGfi V & JAMIE L 2255 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-ss31 HICKMAN KELVIN G & VICKIE R 2175 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN IU 83642-5531 AUSMANEL&DLTRUST AUSMAN E L & D L CO-TRUSTEES 4010 N LOCUST GROVE RD MERIDL4N ID 83642-5523 JO1NT SCHOOL CT NO 2 911 N ME RD ME ID.83642 4CUST GROVE RD DAMS TOME &ySUE C 2740E `USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-SS34°., HOLLISTER JAMES R & HOLLISTER KAREN L 3860 N LOCUST GROVE RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-SS10 SYJ1vIMERFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION' b223 N DISCOVERY WAY STE i 00 $OlSE ID 83713-1.558 N LOCUST GROVE RD E SUMMERRIDGE DR SHILOH DEVELOPNi1NT LTD CO PO BOx a58s2 BOISE ID° 83711 1630 E StTMMERRIDGE DR 28888?1297 TD 3363680, "` -P:©3<'1© ~y BLOOD TIMOTHY E & MARGE L -e 1654 E SLTMMERIDGE I7R MERIDIAN ID $3642 WETHERED PEGGY 4393 OARRITY, BLVD NAMPA ID 83687.. 1688 E SUNIlUIERRJDGE DR CLARKS JOHN T 8t STEPHANIE H 1710 E SUMMERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID ` 83642 ~. MorrTGOMERY BRIAN K & BlsxvP sxERYL L~ 1728 E SUNIlvIERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 ARIMA HARRY R & ARIMA. MARY S ` 1818 E SUMI~~RRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 STRONG LOIS M 1840 E SUMMERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 ROY THEODORE A 8t ROY LAURIE M 1866 E SUMMERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83b42 SCE[AFFNER CONSTRUCTION INC 1655 FAIRVIE W 5UITE #206 BOISE ID $3702 1888 E SUMMERRIDGE DR LAKATOS JOSEPH STEVEN & LAKATOS PATRICIA K 1912 E SIJ14Ilt~RRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 .~ 4 1 DEC 1~ ' 98 13 26 FR PUBLd C WORKS "~' ~ ` __, TURNER CHARLES D `8r CHARLENE R 2305 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5531 CLAPP GEORGE V $c JAN1E L 2255 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83642-5531 HICKMAN KEL'ViN G & VICKIE R 2175 PARADISE LN MERIDIAN ID 83b42-5531 AUSMAN E L & D L TRUST BUSMAN E L & D L CO-TRUSTEES 4010 N LOCUST GROVE RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5523 JOINT SCHOOL CT NO 2 911 N ME RD ME ID 83542 OGUST GROVE RD "DAMS TOME & SUE C 2?40 E USTICK RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5534°:. _• . HOLLISTER JAMES R`& n HOLLISTER KAREN L 3860 N LOCUST GROVE RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-5510 SYTIvIlViERFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIA?ION b223 N DISCOVERY WAY STE 100 $O1SE ID '83713-a 55$ N LOCUST GROVE RD E`SUMMERRIDGE DR SHILOH DEVELOPMENT LTD CO P(3 BOX 45852 $OISE ID 83711 1630 E SLTMMERRIDGE DR 2088871297 TO 3363680 ~="T'~P.:`03f'10 BLOOD TIMOTHY E° & MARGE L ~ 1654. E ST.JNIlVIERIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 WETHERED PEGGY 4393 GARRITY BLVD NAMPA ID 83687 1688 E SITNiMERRIDGE DR CLARKS JOHN T & STEPHAIJIE H 1.710 E SUMMERRIDGE DR NtF.RIDIAN ID 83642 t MONTGOMERY $RIAN K 8c BISHOP SHERYL L 1728 E Si]NAQERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83b42 ARIMA HARRY R & AR1MA MARY S 1818 B $UMN~RRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 STRONG LOTS M 1840 E S GE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 ROY THEODORE A & ROY LAURIE M 18b6 E SUMMERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 SCI~[AFFNER CONSTRUCTION INC 1b55 FAIRVIEW SUITE #206 BOISE ID '83702 1888 E SUMMERRIDGE DR LAKATOS 30SEPH STEVEN & LAKATOS PATRICIA K 1912 E SUIvIlt~RRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 L` °;~, Y DEC 14 '98 1327 FR PUBLIC WORKS STEPI-iENSON GLEN K & ST£PHENSON ANGELA C 1930 E SLIMMERRZDGE DR MERIDIANI.,LS ID 83642 HEELER DAVID R ~ IiELLER TAMMY I 1942 E SUMMERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 TALLMAN ORRIN P & TALLMAN 7'ERI K 1956 E SUMMERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 GALLAGHER DOROTHY E 1790 E SUMMERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 FENGLER KARL 8t FENGLER LYNDA 1968 E SUMMERRIDGE bR MERIDIAN ID 83642 MARSHALL MICHAEL JAMES & MARSHALL DEBRA Std 1734 W SUMI~~RRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 STILLMAN DAVID r & ST'II.LMAN JULIE RAE 1$87 E SIaIv11vIERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-5597 SUIvIlvIERFIELD DEVELOPMENT FO BOX 2044 IDAHO FALLS ID 83403-2044 1911 E SUNIl~~RRIDGE DR 1633 E SiJMN1ERRIDGE DR 165? E SI:fMMERRIDGE DR 1974 E SU11~Il41ERRIDGE DR VANDEWATER CHESTER L 8t VANDEWATER RENA M 1937 E SLfMTvlERRIDGE MERIDIAN ID 83642 2©88871297 TO 336368© P.©4i1~ RANDY JONES CONSTRUCTION INC 1160 TORINO AVE MERIDIAN ID $3642 1565 E SUA!IMERRIDGE DR HEITMAN GREGORY E & HEITMAN PHYLLIS A 1762 E SUNIIv1ERRIDGE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 SGHAFFNER CONSTR. N INC 1655 FAIRVIEW SUITE #20 -Q~ BOIS 83702 1 E SUNIMERRIDGE DR bONEY DOUGLAS S & DONEY TANYA R l 801 E STJA~Il~iERRIDGE bR MERIDIAN ID 83642 I`I~ V~ ~ l ti `` DEC 1~ 38 13 27 FR PUBLIC WORKS 208887 i ..... _ -..T I -- -__.1.. l _1--. .__ __. ..._ -, -°-~-- I 1297 TO 3363680 ' ! I-;-I . ,~ ~ . ~, ~I 'i •~•~.a.~.i.~. r • ~`, • ~ --! r'te' '~' ~~.`.-__ _ - - _ __ ~ _ ,• ~~% .i .~ " i. ^~~ ' ~' i ! f I _. _ __--_ P.05f10 1 : ~ r ~Ckool D1Stl'i[~ Nn. 7 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MAY 18, 1999 APPLICANT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6 REQUEST: ORDINANCE FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED ORDINANCE CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: J¢ ~q~ ~l1/" BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MAY 18, 1999 r~ APPLICANT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 5 REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR 40.55 ACRES AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED MINUTES ~ plP1 , CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY; CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presen#ed at public meetings shat{ become property of the City of Meridian. ~~ '~ ~~ ~~ Meridian City Council Meeting May 4, 1999 Page 3 Unidentified: Why is that being pulled? Corrie: Because they don't want to be annexed. Any other discussion? All right, voting, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 2. TABLED 4/20/99: ORDINANCE # -- ADD ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF: Anderson: Mr. Mayor, Fire Chief Kenny Bowers informed me tonight that due to the city attorney being ill that he has not had a chance to work with him on that, so I would recommend that we table that for at least another two weeks, which would be the meeting on the 18th. How long was Bi(( going to be out did you say Eric? Rossman: Well according to the doctor, he's supposed to be out at least two weeks. With Bill you never know. He's been indicating to me that he should be back in the office somewhat.. at least part time within the next not next week but the week after. Anderson: I don't think this is pressing, so I'would make a motion that we table this until June 1 sc -Bird: Second. aCorrie: Any further discussion? Motion was made by Mr. Anderson second by Mr. Bird to table until June 1 . All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OF 40.55 ACRES BY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 -EAST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD, BETWEEN USTICK AND MCMILLAN ROAD JUST NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD SUB: ORDINANCE # -ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY MERIDIAN. JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2: Cowie: We don't have that signed by the school district. Their board meeting will not be .until. next Monday, and so consequently we need to table that one until. the 18th of May. Rountree: Mr. Mayor t move that we table items 3 and 4 until our next regularly scheduled meeting May 18tH Bentley: Second. • Meridian City Council Meeting May 4, 1999 Page 4 Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bentley to table items number 3 and 4 to be tabled until May 18th. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Rossman: Ma'am, this is not a public hearing. Corrie: It's not a public hearing. Sorry. 5. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OF 10.02 FOR PROPOSED YUKON SUBDIVISION BY JAMES AND KAREN ~HOLLISTER -- EAST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD, BETWEEN USTICK AND MCMILLAN ROAD JUST NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD SUB: 6. ORDINANCE # -ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 10.02 ACRES BY JAMES AND KAREN HOLLISTER: Corrie: It would be in order to have item number 5 and 6 tabled. Bentley: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Bird to table item number 5 and 6 until May 18th. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 7. ORDINANCE #823 - REZONE OF 0.578 ACRES FROM R-15 & R-4 TO L-O FOR MERIDIAN FIRE STATION BY CITY OF MERIDIAN -WEST OF NORTH TEN MILE, BETWEEN TETER & MUIRFIELD: Corrie: Mr. Clerk what is that ordinance number going to be? Berg: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, it will be number 823. Corrie: Would the City Clerk please read Ordinance #823 by title only? Berg: Yes, thank you Mayor. (ORDINANCE #823 WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY) K e s e RESOLUTION NO 22 I k ~BY:~7~,e~K ~e~~le A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDLAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS ,AND PURPOSES;., AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF -SAID MUNICIPALITY, AN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", DATED THE !`~~ DAY OF z _~ , f'~~- , 1999, BY'AND mBETWEEN THE CITY OF M IDLAN AND MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL ,DISTRICT NO. 2. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDLA,N, IDAHO: ~~ y~ WHEREAS, it is in the .best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement with MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, denoted as "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" a copy of which is attached hereto marked as . . Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are as set forth in said Agreement'. 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL as follows: a 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into and on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain agreement with MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 entitled. "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" dated the ~8~ day of RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; AUTHORIZING _ 1 CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,WITH MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 3 • • < < ~ CERTIFICATE~OF~CLERI~ k: ~AOF a -THE CITY OF MERIDLAN I, the andersigned, do hereby certify: 1. That I am the duly appointed and elected Clerk of the City of Meridian,. a duly incorporated City operating under the laws of the State of Idaho, with its .principal office at 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. } 2. That as the City Clerk of this City, I am the custodian of its records and.. minutes and do hereby certify that on the ~~~'~ ,day of ~ , 1999, the following action has been taken and authorized: ~~ A RESOLUTION' OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND .PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO`ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, AN A REEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", DATED THE ~1~~' DAY OF ~ , 1999, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND RIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2. , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: a :WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement with MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, denoted as <"DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" a copy of which is attached hereto marked as Exhibit' ``A" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are as set forth in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL as follows: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into and on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain agreement with MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL 3 CERTIFICATE OF CLERK OF THE 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN .. . ~ . k ,,. a 1999, by and between the~City of Meridian and Meridian Joint . School District No. 2, a copy of which is attached hereto marked as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to. bind this City to its terms and conditions. PASSEDFBYTHE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ~S day of ,. , °1999. a ~ ' APPROVED' BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ~~ day of Gt , 1999. R ATTEST: , ..~ ~ ~ M ITY CLERK _. ^' ~Y~i~.Y M msg\Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\School Dist\Resolutior~~~g0 ~~T 19"~ '~ ~~~~'~~ r~ .~ ~ ~~w i F RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, AUTHORIZING 2 CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH ' MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 y. • k DISTRICT NO. 2 entitled "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" dated the`S'~day of ~ , 1999,. by and between the -City of Meridian and Meridian Joint School istrict No. 2, a copy of which is attached-hereto marked as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terms and conditions. ``1tt,y1ti3t;l;f;g~~jt ~, ,~ ~ xf :_ ~ ~''' o~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. .. .. Y: ~,• ., ,icy 4 STATE yOF IDAHO,~`~~ c~N ~~ • ,.~`~ ~ ~ ~~~jtl;i~iSStSttttt\ County of Ada, ) ' On this day of , it the year 1999, before me, a Notary Public, appeared: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known or identified tome to be the City Clerk of the City of 1Vleridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged tome that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho Commission Expires:_ msg\Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\School Dist\CertificationClerkfor RES . ` s ., i .. CERTIFICATE OF CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN a a. 2 ~i '"~ 'lAYARRO Au(l 1~5;i' r i Pr~1 I~ 48 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. ~ Z 6 Y RtCC~GLD-R:,~UcST CF ~~~ 9905359_ AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT CERTAIN LAND LIES CONTIGUOUS OR ADJACENT TO THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; AND FINDING THAT THE OWNER HAS MADE A REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION IN WRITING TO THE COUNCIL; AND THAT SAID LAND BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND ZONING DESIGNATED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-4); AND DECLARING THAT SAID LAND, BY PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BE A PART OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID PROPERTY TO THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO; AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE AREAS TO BE ANNEXED WITH ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AUDITOR, TREASURER AND ASSESSOR, AND THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE SECTION 50-223 AND SECTION 63-2215. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. FINDINGS: That the following described land is contiguous and adjacent to the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation to the City of Meridian, Idaho, by the owner of said Property to-wit: A parcel of land located in the SW 1/4 of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of the SW 1/4 (West 1/4 corner) of Section 32, T. 4N., R. lE., B.M., the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Thence N 89°54' 10" E 1990.54 feet to the NE corner of the W 1/a of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 32; Thence S 0°01'20" E 728.57 feet to a point on the east line of said W 1/a; MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (40.55) Thence S 89°48'44" W 604.48 feet fo a point; Thence•S 0°00'57" E 225.95 feet to a point; Thence S 89°50'05" W 1386.36 feet to a point on the west line of said Section 32; Thence N 0°00'11" W 957.12 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. This parcel contains 40.55 acres, more or less, and is subject to all existing easements and rights-of-way. SECTION 2: That the above-described real property be, and the same is hereby annexed and made a part of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. SECTION 3: That the real property herein by this ordinance annexed to the City of Meridian hereinabove described shall be zoned Low Density Residential District (R-4). SECTION 4: That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, comprehensive plan and all official maps depicting the boundaries of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 5: The zoning designation set forth in Section 3 of this ordinance is subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Development Agreement by and between the City of Meridian and the owner of the land described in Section 1 dated the day of ~ ~ , 1999. SECTION 6: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (40.55) ~ ~ SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8: The Cleric of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of°this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner plainly and clearly designating the boundaries of the City of Meridian, including the lands herein annexed, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho, all in compliance with Idaho Code §63-2215 and §50-223. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this / v - day of , 1999. APPR VED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this G ~~`day of 2 ` , 1999. -~GIAY R ```lr~te~t q2 t i t {9 ! f i tl-1;11x1j Cif ~~~ ~. ~~ ~~ 1 '~~ ATTE =' ~ d ~ - w~L %~,~~ lid T~~ ~~ `~~.. CITY CLERIC ~~~ ~Q~ ~~ ~,. \~~ i~Jl ~ ~~ ,-~[ rQ \~~ msg\Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Meridian Joint School Dist:'Idp~~jWZ4~~~8t`J~D.WPD ftt;{{{i{1~ k. MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 3 ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (40.55) • CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To: The Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor of Ada County, and The State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Cleric, of the City of Meridian, Ada County, State of Idaho, do hereby certify that the attached copy of Ordinance No.~~~' passed by the City Council of the City of Meridian, on the day of ~ 1999, is a true and correct copy of the original of said document which is in t care, custody and control of the City Cleric of the City of Meridian. ``~~zti~s~ ftrrr`°r a f ~~L WILLIAM G. BERG, J 9 ~~' STATE OF IDAI~~Jp~ r 3 '~ ~ ~ ~~~,~`'~~ County of Ada, ~~~"~f~~"{"~~`~d~~`',,,, On this ~ ~~ day of `7 r ~ , in the ear 1999, before me, Y a Notary Public, appeared WILL G. BERG, JR., known or identified to me to be the City Cleric of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. ?Y ,'6'',~~ifpl~/t~j,. 3 ,,~ ~~L L. SI ry4e r e (~~ ~"" A.1~ p g a Nota Public for Idaho ~ s ~..~ g * ~ Commission Expires: ~~/S ~~.~_ ° G ~ ~ AUB~~ ~ w va ~ e o ,~< C~~ ° s .~ ~oi° ®°®oso•°• ~ ,~0 ~'~~B®00681`d~, CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN H CS' A 0 -~ __~~/ .. -~_'1 II II 1 I' I II II I I l II I ~I i II I II i I~ II I' I 1 .' I I 1 II I ~ I I. i II I I ~ I I I' I II ~ I~ I 1 II II I' I I t II I I' ~~ r - - `~_ - - ~~--_------- -~ ~ - z_ -~- I ~ ^ 'I ~ 11I ~ •~J ~I i C ., ~ .G ~I \3 m ~ ~i I ~ 1 ,` ~~ ~I I I / ~I I ' 1 1 i O ~, ii' ` - O`/r. f ~~ ,, ~_;~ ~ =~; - - i~l li ail ;: ~ i 1, .-----~ _~ i X11 ~ ~.--- -_ r i ~I li ' I I ~;I ~jl ~.r`~ I ~ Ii ail ~\~-- _-- I 1 ~, }i ail ~ ~----- I ~1 I ~~ ~ --- I, ~' ' ~ ' 1 ~' I ~~' I .. I ' I 1 1 II 11 ~ II ,I I `~~ it I i~ ; C I 4~ I Iln ~' ~I~ `' I I ~' [/!Ij it n-1'i '' ~ I ^~~ 'i~ I I Ill v I ;I I;,{ u ~I; I~ 1 ~ I i ------- -~ ;r I I >. ' ;, I ~i ~' li I ,4 I ' I I I I ~~ . , ~_~ i II 1 li 'f' I ' I II i If 'ice y ~i a~o• y ------ I 1 r ~ ' ~~ it ~~ ~I a ' I I ~ ~ 7 I\I~ ~ /~\ r rl D ~ ..i'~ 1 I 1 1~ ~1~~~ ~; S ~ V ~1 1 ~ ~ ' ~~ I 1 -- ~ I I .~ ,._ ' II I ~ - - ' - - - _- ~ ' i it ~ ' II I I ~---~ q ' II I I ~ II ~ n ~ I' I I J ~~ i I ' ~ ~ ~ I I ' li i ' ~ li it f I 1 ~1 11 I I = I I I I J+ l i '' ' , II I I I i / ~ ., I = I II ~ i~ it ~ ~ 4 ' ' I I I f~l. i ~ I; ; I T ~ ~' I I I I t ti O I I I I I z II ~ I I I . ,~ ,~, ,1 I ~~ I ~~ {l IA I I ~~ . I I 0 I 1 ~ Ii it ' Z, li~l l z ~~~ __--=_--- I r -------------- I ,~---- ~ I, t -------1 i"-;~' i t~ ~~ i ~ -- ---l; ;j ~ ._I I' ' ~ ~ .' I; .1 _J I I I' ------ J' li it +' ~ ~ I t 4 II ~ II I I' I 1 I l.. i .~ , I . I I Ir I i I l // ' ~ I /~~/ ~, ' ~~ / % ii ;~ 1 ~~ ~ ~>/ ; r `~~~ _ "' CORDED • REQUEST D~' a~~1 COUNTY R . S. OA4'!~ FlAYpRR Q€~~~ F'EE_Sl~.. ~~ DEU~~>l~[~ AC~E~EMENT ~ ~ Q ~ O 9 lg9q~ y,2 v P~ / . a. 9 THIS DEVELOPMENT AGRK.~EEMENT (this "Agreement"), is made and entered into this j~~` day of d , 1999, by and between CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corpor ion of the State of Idaho, hereafter called "CITY", and MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, hereinafter called "DEVELOPER", whose address is 911 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho 83642. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the "Property"; and 1.2 WHEREAS, I.C. §67-6511A, Idaho Code, provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of re-zoning that the owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, CITY has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Ordinance 11-2-416L and 11-2-417D, which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, DEVELOPER has submitted an application for annexation and zoning of the Property's described in Exhibit A, and requested a designation of Low Densit~Residential. ~R-4~, 11-2-408 (B) (3) (Municipal Code of the City of Meridian), and has submitted a site plan in connection with the development of the property, which site plan is subject to specified terms and conditions, has been recommended for approval by the Meridian Planning Sz Zoning Commission to the Meridian City Council; and 1.5 WHEREAS, DEVELOPER made representations at the public hearings both before the Meridian Planning &. Zoning Commission and before the Meridian City Council, as to how the subject Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 1.6 WHEREAS, record of the proceedings request for annexation and zoning designation of the subject Property held before the Planning & Zoning Commission, and subsequently before the City Council, include responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and received further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, City Council, the2o~day of ~/ , 1999, has approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the Planning and Zoning Commission and Decision and Order, set forth in Exhibit B, which are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated as if set forth in full, hereinafter referred to as (the "Findings"); and 1.8 WHEREAS, the "Findings" require the DEVELOPER enter into a development agreement before the City Council takes final action on annexation and zoning designation; and 1.9 WHEREAS, DEVELOPER deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and requests; and 1.10 WHEREAS, CITY requires the DEVELOPER to enter into a development agreement for the purpose ensuring that the property is developed and the subsequent use of "the Property" is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this development agreement, herein been established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for annexation and zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure annexation and zoning designation is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance #629, January 4, 1994, and the Zoning and Development Ordinance codified in Title 11, Municipal Code of the City of Meridian. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 • NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full.. 3. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: 3.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are those uses allowed under CITY's Zoning Ordinance Low Density Residential R-4 codified at section 11-2-408 (B) (3) Municipal Code of the City of Meridian. 3.2 DEVELOPER agrees that this Agreement specifically allows only the uses and/or conditional uses described in the above referenced Zoning Ordinance on the date thereof and which uses are specifically incorporated herein. 3.3 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 4. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBTECT PROPERTY: 4.1 This application is for annexation and zoning of 40.55 acres located on the east side of Locust Grove Road between Ustick and McMillian Roads, just north of Summerfield Subdivision, Meridian, Idaho. The legal description shall be prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor, Licensed by the State of Idaho, and shall conform to all the provisions of the City of Meridian Resolution No. 158. The legal description for annexation must place this parcel contiguous to the Corporate City Limits per Ordinance No. 686. 4.2 That the City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate ordinance for the annexation and zoning designation. (R-4) Low Density Residential Ordinance shall not be finally approved by the City Council until provisions of parts 1 and 3 of this order have been met; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 3 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 4.3 Developer enter into a Development Agreement, that provides in the event the conditions therein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be subject to de-.annexation, with the City of Meridian which provides for the following conditions of development to-wit: 4.1.1 Sanitary sewer serviceability to this site is questionable since this parcel is on the fringe of the service area of existing mains. Applicant's engineer shall verify the feasibility of service. ' 4.1.2 Water service to this parcel could be extended from the existing main located in Locust Grove Road. 4.1.3 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing or adjacent to the property shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9- 605.M. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 'P Due to the fact that only the southwestern portion of the subject parcel is to be developed the requirements of this provision shall not appertain to the ditch that runs parallel and adjacent to the northern boundary of the subject property until such time as the applicant develops any portion of the subject property that is north of any point that is midway between the northern and southern boundary of the subject parcel at which time the provisions of this requirement shall then apply and require the tiling of said ditch. 4.1.4 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 4.1.5 City Well 18 needs to be on line prior to the occupancy of the subject development. , DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 4 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 4..1.6 Central sewer will need to be made available to the subject project. 4.1.7 Beverly Donahue is concerned with the location of the entryway to~the subject development and desires that it not be adjacent to her driveway, which issues should be resolved with the applicant but are subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada County Highway District; and 4.1.8 That Beverly Donahue is concerned .about the lack of bike and pedestrian lanes north of the subject parcel, which issues should also be reviewed with and subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada County Highway District; and 4.1.9 That Tom Davis farms his parcel, which lies adjacent and to the east of the subject property, and he is concerned with blowing trash from the development and use, and in order to prevent the same requests that the applicant construct a six (6') foot permanent chain link fence on the east boundary of the subject property for the entire length of the eastern boundary as it abuts the Davis property. 4.1.lOThat the subject annexation and zoning be limited to school educational use and specifically exclude residential subdivisions. 5. INSPECTION: DEVELOPER shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Development. _ 6. COMPLIANCE PERIODI CONSENT TO REZONE: This Agreement and the commitments contained herein shall be terminated, and the zoning designation reversed, upon failure of DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER'S heirs, successors, assigns, to comply with the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 5 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 commitments contained herein within two (2) years, and after complying with the notice and hearing procedures as outlined in § 67- 6509, Idaho Code, or any subsequent amendments or recodifications thereof. Provided, however, no such consent to rezone shall occur unless CITY provides written notice of any failure to comply with this Agreement to DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER fails to cure such failure within six (6) months of such notice. The two (2) year period of tune for compliance may be extended by CITY for just cause and upon notification for such by DEVELOPER, and after complying with the notice and hearing procedures as outlined in § 67-6509, Idaho Code, or any subsequent amendments or recodifications thereof. 7. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: CITY shall record either a memorandum of this Agreement or this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, at DEVELOPER'S cost, and submit proof of such recording to DEVELOPER, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the CITY shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 8. ZONING: CITY shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 9. DEFAULT 9.1 In the event DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER's heirs, successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property, fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connections with the Property, this Agreement may be modified or terminated by the CITY upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 9.2 A waiver by CITY of any default by DEVELOPER of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 the breach and breaches waived and shall not bar any other rights or remedies of CITY or apply to any subsequent breach of any such or other covenants and conditions. 10. REMEDIES. This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction by either CITY or DEVELOPER, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. 10.1 In the event of a material breach of this Agreement, the parties agree that CITY and DEVELOPER shall have thirty (30) days after delivery of notice of said breach to correct the same prior to the non-breaching party's seeking of any remedy provided for herein; provided, however, that in the case of any such default which cannot with diligence be cured within such thirty (30) day period, if the defaulting party shall commence to cure the same within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter shall prosecute the curing of same with diligence and continuity, then the time within such failure may be cured shall be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 10.2 In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either DEVELOPER or CITY is delayed for causes which are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The CITY may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under 11-9-606 C of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the CITY of Meridian, to insure that installation of the improvements, and the DEVELOPER agrees to provide such, if required by the CITY. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE '7 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: That DEVELOPER agrees that no Certificates of Occupancy will be issued until all improvements are completed, unless the CITY and DEVELOPER have entered into an addendum agreement stating when the improvements will be completed in a phased developed; in any event, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the CITY. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That DEVELOPER agrees to abide by all ordinances of the CITY of Meridian and the property shall be subject to de-annexation if the owner or his assigns, heirs, or successors shall not meet the conditions contained in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this Development Agreement, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 14. Notices: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: c/o City Engineer City of Meridian City 200 E. Carlton, Suite 101 Meridian, ID 83642 DEVELOPER: Meridian Joint School District No. 2 911 Meridian Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 with copy to: City Clerlc City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 r ~` 15. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. Binding upon Successors: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including CITY's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the owner of the Property, each subsequent owner and each other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefitted and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. CITY agrees, upon written request of DEVELOPER, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if CITY, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that DEVELOPER has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. 18. Invalid Provision. If-any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised therefrom and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein, except that if an provision of this Agreement is held not valid which DEVELOPER'S development of the Property, DEVELOPER may, at its sole discretion, declare this entire Agreement null and void of no force and effect and thereby relieve all parties from any obligations hereunder. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 9 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 • • 15. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto aclcno~vledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. Binding upon Successors: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including CITY's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the owner of the Property, each subsequent owner and each other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefitted and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. CITY agrees, upon written request of DEVELOPER, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if CITY, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that DEVELOPER has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. 18. Invalid Provision. If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised therefrom and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein, except that if an provision of this Agreement is held not valid which DEVELOPER'S development of the Property, DEVELOPER may, at its sole discretion, declare this entire Agreement null and void of no force and effect and thereby relieve all parties from any obligations hereunder. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 9 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 ACIQVOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and Made it effective as hereinabove provided. oint School District No. 2 BY: Attest: RESOLUTIO NO. CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: Mayo Robert D. Corrie Attest: ~,~ ~ ~ ~"'~f4,~~~ ~~`~ a~~ - ~ SJR~iL 9 City Clerk ;,~~ 9~ ~T ~~ "~~~ BY RESOLUTION NO. ~ 2.. ~ ~~'''~. ~~Y ' ~~`~~~ '~~hN+r~1 ti~n~~~`• DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 11 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 • STATE OF IDAHO) :ss COUNTY OF ADA) On this 10`x'` day of M ~y in the year 1999, before me, 1~1 A-^~ ~y ~'` ~ • ~hu~ a Notary Public, personally appeared ~} Wally ~ ri Gk. , known or identified to me, to be the C~+airnta~ c~'~he $oa,+-d. ~rrei of Meridian Joint School District No. 2, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said Meridian Joint School District No. 2, and acknowledged to me that such. City executed the same. ~ ~b~w~Y ~*-- Notary P lic for Idaho Commission expires: 3'~7'~O3 ..~"' * G c rUD~,~ o 7''~-.,.'~ rE OP 19.'~,~ STATE OF IDAHO) :ss County of Ada ) On this day of ~1~~ in the year 1999, before me, /~'(,/~ , a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert D. Corri nd William G. Berg, know or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. j',~y~ aewoq~~'i +*°~GEL L. S +++. ~I T~~ ~ ~ Y ®i~ e AUB LZG S •~ / ^ % t ~l ~ Nota Public for Idaho Commission expires: d msg~Z~Mui®,ijc~.~~ll~idian 15360MV~teridian Joint School Dist. No. 2 (AZ)~Meridian School Dist No. 2 (40.55) DEV AGMNT.wpd DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 12 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 C7 EXHIBIT A Leal Description Of Pro~ert~ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 13 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 ~1 EXHIBIT "A" A parcel of land located in the SW 1/4 of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of the SW 1/4 (West 1/4 corner) of Section 32, T. 4N., R. lE., B.M., the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Thence N 89°54' 10" E 1990.54 feet to the NE corner of the W I/~ of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 32; Thence S 0°01'20" E 728.57 feet to a point on the east line of said W'/z; Thence S 89°48'44" W 604.48 feet to a point; Thence S 0°00'57" E 225.95 feet to a point; Thence S 89°50'05" W 1386.36 feet to a point on the west line of said Section 32; Thence N 0°00'11" W 957.12 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. This parcel contains 40.55 acres, more or less, and is subject to all existing easements and rights-of--way. EXHIBIT B Findings of Fact and Conclusions of LawlConditions of Approval DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PAGE 14 MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE ) Case No. AZ-9$-105 APPLICATION OF MERIDIAN ) JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND 2, THE APPLICATION FOR ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ANNEXATION AND ZONING ) DECISION AND ORDER OF 40.55 ACRES ON THE EAST ) GRANTING APPLICATION FOR SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ) ANNEXATION AND ZONING NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD ) SUBDIVISION, MERIDIAN, IDAHO The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for public hearing on April 6, 1999, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., and Christine Donnell, Superintendent of Joint School District No. 2, and Wayne Thowless, of Leatham and Krohn, Architect for Joint School District No. 2, having appeared and testified in favor of the application, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, presented the staff -report, and Beverly Donahue and Tom Davis testified as affected property owners, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 1 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) u FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The notice of public hearing on the application for annexation and zoning was published for two (2}consecutive-weeks prior to said public hearing scheduled for April 6, 1999, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred (300') feet of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; and that copies of all,notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the April 6, 1999, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit-evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and. hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511, and §§11-2-416E and 11-2-417A, Municipal Code of the City of Meridian. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and development ordinances codified at Title 11, Municipal Code of the City of Meridian, and all current zoning maps thereof, and the Comprehensive Plan of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 2 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • • 12. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zone, development and use of the subject parcel is otherwise consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, in that, the project facilitates a stated community value contained in: 12. I The Foreward at page 1, which is "Prevent school overcro~vdin~enhance education services; and 12.2 Under the section entitled "School Facilities" by meeting the School Siting Goal Statement by its proximity to existing residential subdivisions, the size of the parcel and the fact that it is not proposed to be sited next to incompatible uses or hazards as set forth at pages 13 and 14; and 12.3 Under the section entitled "Land Use" Comprehensive Plan Map objectives nos. 3, 6 and 7 at page 22; and 12.4 In Land Use Goal Statements §§ 1.5U, 1.8U, 2.2U and 2.3U at page 23. 13. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: Construct and utilize a charter high school . 14. The Applicant's requested zoning of the subject real property as Low Density Residential (R-4) is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. 15. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that .FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 4 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • i affect the consideration of this application. 16. The land within the proposed annexation area is contiguous to the present city limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 17. The property which is the subject of this application is within the .Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 18. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 19. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed: Adopt the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Assistant City Engineer Recommendations as follows: 19.1 Sanitary sewer serviceability to this site is questionable since this parcel is on the fringe of the service area of existing mains. Applicant's engineer shall verify the feasibility of service. 19.2 Water service to this parcel could be extended from the existing main located in Locust Grove Road. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 5 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING 1 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • 19.3 Anv existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing or adjacent to the property shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of anv ditches crossing this project. Due to the fact that only the southwestern portion of the subject parcel is to be developed the requirements of this provision shall not appertain to the ditch that runs parallel and adjacent to the northern boundary of the subject property until such time as the applicant develops any portion of the subject property that is north of any point that is midway between the northern and southern boundary of the subject parcel at which time the provisions of this requirement shall then apply and require the tilingof said ditch. 19.4 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. Adopt the City of Meridian Water Department Recommendation as follows: 19.5 City Well 18 needs to be on line prior to the occupancy of the subject development. Adopt the Central District Health Department recommendations as follows: 19.6 Central sewer will need to be made available to the subject project. 20. It is found that if the developer pays for the requested improvements and complies with the conditions set forth in these findings of fact no. 16, and all subparts, the economic welfare of the City and its residents and tax and rate payers will be protected, which requirement shall be included in a development agreement, a FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 6 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) condition of annexation and zoning designation. 21. It is found that the following are development considerations which must be taken into account, in order to assure the proposed development is designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a manner which is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing, or intended character of the general vicinity, in order to assure that the proposed use will not change the essential character of the affected vicinity and will insure that the proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing, or future neighboring uses, particularly considering the impact of proposed development on potential to produce excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare and odors: 21.1 That Beverly Donahue is concerned with the location of the entryway to the subject development and desires that it not be adjacent to her driveway, which issues should be resolved with the applicant but are subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada County Highway District; and 21.2 That Beverly Donahue is concerned about the lack of bike and pedestrian lanes north of the subject parcel, which issues should also be reviewed with and subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada County Highway District; and 21.3 That Tom Davis farms his parcel, which lies adjacent and to the east of the subject property, and he is concerned with blowing trash from the development and use, and in order to prevent the same requests that the applicant construct a six (6') foot permanent chain link fence on the east boundary of the subject property for the entire length of the eastern boundary as it abuts the Davis property. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 7 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) 21.4 That the subject annexation and zoning be limited to school educational use and specifically exclude residential subdivisions. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian has authority to annex real property upon written request for annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city boundaries and that said, property lies within the area of city impact as provided by Idaho Code Section 50-222. The Municipal Code of the City of Meridian Section 11- 2-417 provides the City may annex real property that is within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State 3. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975', codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by the adoption of `Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. No. 629, January 4, 1994. 4. The following are found to be pertinent provisions of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan and are applicable to this Application: 4.1 The Foreward at page 1, which is "Prevent school overcrowdingenhance education services; and 4.2 Under the section entitled "School Facilities" by meeting the School Siting Goal Statement by its proximity to existing residential FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 8 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING i MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) subdivisions, the size of the parcel and the fact that it is not proposed to be sited next to incompatible uses or hazards as set forth at pages 13 and 14; and 4.3 Under the section entitled "Land Use" Comprehensive Plan Map objectives nos. 3, 6 and ~ at page 22; and 4.4 In Land Use Goal Statements §§ 1.SU, 1.8U, 2.2U and 2.3U at page 23. 5. The requested zoning of Lo~v Density Residential (R-4) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at I 1-2-408 B. 14. as follows: ~R-4) Low Density Residential District: Only single-family dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except. for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single- family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non- residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. 6. That Section l 1-2409, ZONING SCHEDULE OF USE CONTROL, B, Commercial, lists commercial uses allowed in the various zoning districts of the City; that schools are listed as permitted uses in the Low Density Residential (R-4) District. 7. That the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under LAND USE, Mixed-Use Area at Eagle Road, in 5.16U, states that all development requests will be FINDINGS OF EA.CT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 9 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • subject to development review and conditional use permit processing to insure neighborhood compatibility. 8. By authority of the City of Meridian under the Comprehensive Plan, a conditional use permit is required for Applicant to construct and operate any stores or facilities on this parcel of land. 9. Since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. See Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P2d 1075 (1983). 10. The development of the annexed land, if annexed, shall meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian including, but not limited to: Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements; Section 11-9-605 M, which pertains to the piping of ditches; and Section 11-9-606 B 14., which pertains to pressurized irrigation systems. 11. The development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Zoning and Subdivision and Development Ordinance of the City of Meridian. 12. Section 11-2417 D of the Zoning and Development Ordinance provides in part as follows: If property is annexed and zoned, the City may require or permit, as a condition of the zoning, that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject property. If a commitment is required or permitted, it shall be recorded in the office of the Ada County Recorder and shall take effect upon the adoption of the ordinance FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page I O AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) ~; ~~ • i annexing and zoning the property, or prior if agreed to by the owner of the parcel. DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby Order and this does Order: 1. This application is for annexation and zoning of 40.55 acres located on the east side of Locust Grove Road between Usticlc and McMillian Roads, just north of Summerfield Subdivision, Meridian, Idaho. The legal description shall be prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor, Licensed by the State of Idaho, and shall conform to all the provisions of the City of Meridian Resolution No. 158. The legal description for annexation must place this parcel contiguous to the Corporate City Limits per Ordinance No. 686. 2. That the City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate ordinance for the annexation and zoning designation. (R-4) Low Density Residential Ordinance shall not be finally approved by the City Council until provisions of parts 1 and 3 of this order have been met; and 3. Developer enter into a Development Agreement, that provides in the event the conditions therein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be subject to de-annexation, with the City of Meridian which provides for the following conditions of development to-wit: 3.1 Sanitary sewer serviceability to this site is questionable since this parcel is on the fringe of the service area of existing mains. Applicant's engineer shall verify the feasibility of service. 3.2 Water service to this parcel could be extended from the existing main located in Locust Grove Road. 3.3 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing or adjacent to the property shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. The ditches to FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 11 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. Due to the fact that only the southwestern portion of the subject parcel is to be developed the requirements of this provision shall not appertain to the ditch that runs parallel and adjacent to the northern boundary of the subject property until such time as the applicant develops any portion of the subject property that is north of any point that is midway between the northern and southern boundary of the subject parcel at tivhich time the provisions of this requirement shall then apply and require the tiling of said ditch. 3.4 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3.5 City Well 18 needs to be on line prior to the occupancy of the subject development. 3.6 Central sewer will need to be made available to the subject project. 3.7 Beverly Donahue is concerned with the location of the entryway to the subject development and desires that it not be adjacent to her driveway, which issues should be resolved with the applicant but are subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada County Highway District; and 3.8 That Beverly Donahue is concerned about the lack of bike. and pedestrian lanes north of the subject parcel, which issues should also be reviewed with and subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada Caunty Highway District; and 3.9 That Tom Davis farms his parcel, which lies adjacent and to the east of the subject property, and he is concerned with blowing trash from the development and use, and in order to prevent the same requests that the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 12 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / .. MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) applicant construct a six (6') foot permanent chain link fence on the east boundary of the subject property for the entire length of the eastern boundary as it abuts the. Davis property. 3.10 That the subject annexation and zoning be limited to school educational use and specifically exclude residential subdivisions. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 13 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person is a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the annexation and zoning and who may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held ~ ~O~ 1999. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN ANDERSON VOTED COUNCILMAN BIRD VOTED COUNCILMAN BENTLEY VOTED COUNCILMAN ROUNTREE VOTED ~~ MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: ~ Zo FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 14 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) ~. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department and the Public Works Department. By' ~%~~ Dated: ~~2©~ City Clerk <<<<~„---~,j ut~~;.~~, ```` ~~,,~s /f~ ~ 4 ~ r~ msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Meridian Joint SC`hool ~ . o. 2 ( ~ omri~DecOrd.Fcs.frm ~ yi YY -_ J ~a~1~M~~ 9 ~~~ 9 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 15 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 18, 1999 PAGE 6 '5. TABLED 5/4/99: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OF 40.55 ACRES BY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 -EAST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD, BETWEEN USTICK AND MCMILLAN ROAD JUST NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD SUB: Corrie: Mr. Clerk, do we have the signed agreement on that one? Berg: Mr. Mayor, I'm just double checking. I do have the signed copy. Corrie: Thank you. Any further discussion on item number five development agreement? Hearing none, t'll entertain a motion on item five. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move we approve the development agreement of 40.55 acres by the Meridian School District No. 2. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Bird to approve item number five the development agreement by the Meridian School District No. 2. Any further discussion? ROLL CALL VOTE: ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. 6. TABLED 5!4/99: ORDINANCE #826 -ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2: Corrie: Mr. Clerk, please read the Ordinance #826 by title only. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor. (ORDINANCE #826 WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY) Corrie: Is there anyone from the audience who would like to have Ordinance #826 read in its entirety? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion on Ordinance #826. Bird: Mr. Mayor I move that we pass Ordinance #826 annex and zoning of 40.55 acres by the Meridian School District No. 2 with suspension of rules. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion is made by Mr. Bird second by Mr. Anderson to approve Ordinance #826 annexation and zoning with the Meridian Joint School District No. 2. Any further discussion? ~: • .MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 18, 1999 PAGE 6 5. TABLED 5/4/99: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OF 40.55 ACRES BY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 -EAST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD, BETWEEN USTICK AND MCMILLAN ROAD JUST NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD SUB: Corrie: Mr. Clerk, do we have the signed agreement on that one? Berg: Mr. Mayor, I'm just double checking. I do have the signed copy. Corrie: Thank you. Any further discussion on item number five development agreement? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion on item five. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move we approve the development agreement of 40.55 acres by the Meridian School District No. 2. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Bird to approve item number five the development agreement by the Meridian School District No. 2. Any further discussion? ROLL CALL VOTE: ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BIRD, YEA. .MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. 6. TABLED 5/4/99: ORDINANCE #826 -ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES a BY MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2: Corrie: Mr. Clerk, please read the Ordinance #826 by title only. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor. (ORDINANCE #826 WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY) Corrie: Is there anyone from the audience who would like to have Ordinance #826 read in its entirety? Hearing none, I'If entertain a motion on Ordinance #826. Bird: Mr. Mayor I move that we pass Ordinance #826 annex and zoning of 40.55 acres by the Meridian School District No. 2 with suspension of rules. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion is made by Mr. Bird second by Mr. Anderson to approve Ordinance #826 annexation .and zoning with the Meridian Joint School District No. 2. Any further discussion? ~ i MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 18, 1999 PAGE 7 ROLL CALL VOTE: ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. Corrie: Mr. Clerk, if you will publish the Ordinance #825 first and then Ordinance #826 second and then would you do a cover letter to the State Tax Commission of the sequential order that they have to do. Berg: Yes, Mr. Mayor, I will. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR REZONE OF 9.838 ACRES FROM R-8 WITH CONDITIONS FOR TOWNHOUSES TO R-8 WITHOUT CONDITIONS FOR PROPOSED TREMONT PLACE SUBDIVISION BY LUNA VISTA, INC.-BROADWAY & 8T" STREET (725 W. 8T"): Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and staff have you got any issues or want to address any of the recommendations first on this? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, you have our comments. It's a little misleading how that's written. They're asking for an R-8 with conditions. This is previously rezoned by Loren Saunders, and the conditions that were put on it was that it had to be developed as a townhouse development as a planned development and that's the conditions they're asking to be changed. Of course they'll have to meet all conditions of the R-8 zone. Also they are asking for a change in the conditions that they not be required to meet the 1300 square foot minimum and that they be allowed to meet the mix of housing sizes that's allowed in the ordinance. The only somewhat outstanding issue that we've had a question on the is the emergency turnaround at the north end of Stn Street there. If they're going to be required to have an emergency turnaround as part of those lots, they may be non buildable and I'm not sure that the fire department has signed off on the proposal they've shown on this plat. As long as they'll meet all the fire department's requirements for that, I really didn't have any other issues. I don't know if Gary - Smith: 1 don't have a comment on the rezone Mr. Mayor and Council. I do have a comment when the preliminary plat comes up. Gigray:~ Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, this would be a point of information and I would pose this as a matter of procedure and maybe give an opportunity for staff and the applicant and then if anyone else is here to testify about this. in preparation for this City Council meeting and reviewing the recommendations to the City Council that are submitted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, I noted that there was a reference in here and I'll refer to section 1.1 where it says the original conditions of rezone request by Loren Saunders included requirements of that and then there's a litany of things 4 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING:_ "~ __ _ MAY. 4t 1999 • APPLICANT: JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 4 REQUEST: ANNEXATION 8~ ZONING ORDINANCE FOR 40.55 ACRES AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED MINUTES FROM 4/20/99 CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED ORDINANCE CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: ~~ ~ ~~ w~~ BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • / ,.„ • Meridian City Council Meeting April 20, 1999 Page 9 ROLL CALL VOTE: ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. 9. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 -EAST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD, BETWEEN USTICK AND MCMILLAN ROAD JUST NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD SUB: Corrie: Going back to item number nine then with the recommendation that we table item number nine for the next meeting according to the City Attorney's explanation. Any other comments from staff our Council? (Inaudible) Corrie: Did you say table? Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, with regards to item number nine, we have a form development agreement for that because there were some conditions requested as a condition of annexation and 'I don't know how you do that without one, so we prepared one for submission, and then I believe there is also an annexation and zoning ordinance for the Hollister property which we have- prepared for your consideration. You might put that on and have someone sponsor it for reading if you approve these actions. That could complete your action on the Hollister - on the School District property. You certainly could I think move forward and approve the findings if you find those satisfactory as well as the form of the development agreement and then hold the action on that annexation ordinance until we've completed the other. Corrie: Okay. Rountree: I'm not confused. I just don't know what's going on. Bird: I'm real confused. Rountree: You say you da have an annexation ordinance. Gigray: We have -1 hope you have one there because I have prepared in my file a development agreement and an annexation ordinance that was sent. Bird: We don't have that Bill. Gigray; Maybe it wasn't sent over. It's been prepared. Bentley: Yeah, we haven't got it. Gigray: Well never mind. You would just hold that until the next meeting. Bird: How about number nine? Bentley: We can approve the findings on nine. • Meridian City Council Meeting April 20, 1999 Page 10 Corrie: Okay, all right. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move that we approve the annexation and zoning for the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the annexation and zoning of Joint Meridian School District No. 2. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Bird to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for request for annexation and zoning by Meridian School District No. 2. Any further discussion? ROLL CALL VOTE: ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BIRD, YEA. a MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. 11. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: REQUEST FOR REZONE OF 0.578 ACRES FROM R-15 & R-4 TO L-O FOR MERIDIAN FIRE STATION BY CITY OF MERIDIAN -WEST OF NORTH TEN MILE, BETWEEN TETER & MUIRFIELD: Corrie: Mr. Mayor I have a question of what the exact acreage is. On the findings, it says .75 and on the agenda it says .578. Is one a typo? Bird: I think .75 is a typo. Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, Councilman Bentley, the description and the final draft includes the road. The original description in the application didn't include the- road and that's the reason for the difference and because we're talking about a rezone here and boundaries and so on, that was felt that it should include all of that and that's why the difference. You see the same thing in the next one and it's the same reason for the difference. Bentley: Thank you. Corrie: Any other questions from Council? Bird: I have none. Corrie: I'll entertain a motion on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on item number 11. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I make a motion we approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order for the request for rezone of the property for the fire station on Ten Mile. Rountree: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Anderson second by Mr. Rountree to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law item number 11. Any further discussion? i MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MAY 4 1999 APPLICANT: JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 3 REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR 40.55 ACRES AGENCY CITY CLERK ~~ ,Q ~ti~~N_ (~-~' ~~ ,~~~~ ~,."" COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED MINUTES FROM 4/20/99 SEE ATTACHED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT M `~'~J.i ~1 \ ~,~ ~ X19 IVILI~Ii -.-v~ ~ ~~. ~. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION; ~~~~h ~,1 ~~~ ~~`' IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • Meridian City Council Meeting April 20, 1999 Page 9 ROLL CALL VOTE: ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. ~ 9. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: REQUEST FOR ~~~'~.:,.~ ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 -EAST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD, BETWEEN USTICK AND MCMILLAN ROAD JUST NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD SUB: Corrie: Going back to item number nine then with the recommendation that we table item number nine for the next meeting according to the City Attorney's explanation. Any other comments from staff our Council? (Inaudible) Corrie: Did you say table? Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, with regards to item number nine, we have a form development agreement for that because there were some conditions requested as a condition of annexation and I don't know how you do that without one, so we prepared one for submission, and then I believe there is also an annexation and zoning ordinance for the Hollister property which we have prepared for your consideration. You might put that on and have someone sponsor it for reading if you approve these actions. That could complete your action on the Hollister - on the School District property. You certainly could t think move forward and approve the findings if you find those satisfactory as well as the form of the development agreement and then hold the action on that annexation ordinance until we've completed the other. Corrie: Okay. Rountree: I'm not confused. I just don't know what's going on. Bird: I'm real confused. Rountree: You say you do have an annexation ordinance. Gigray: We have - I hope you have one there because I have prepared in my file a development agreement and an annexation ordinance that was sent. Bird: We don't have that Bill. Gigray: Maybe it wasn't sent over. It's been prepared. Bentley: Yeah, we haven't got it. Gigray: Well never mind. You would just hold that until the next meeting. Bird: How about number nine? Bentley: We can approve the findings on nine. Meridian City Council Meeting April 20, 1999 Page 10 Corrie: Okay, all right. Bentley: Mr. Mayor 1 move that we approve the annexation and zoning for the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the annexation and zoning of Joint Meridian School District No. 2. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Bird to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for request for annexation and zoning by Meridian School District No. 2. Any further discussion? r ROLL CALL VOTE: ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. 11. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: REQUEST FOR REZONE OF 0.578 ACRES FROM R-15 & R-4 TO L-O FOR MERIDIAN FIRE STATION BY CITY OF MERIDIAN - WEST OF NORTH TEN MILE, BETWEEN TETER & MUIRFIELD: Corrie: Mr. Mayor I have a question of what the exact acreage is. On the findings, it says .75 and on the agenda it says .578. Is one a typo? Bird: f think .75 is a typo. Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, Councilman Bentley, the description and the final draft includes the road. The original description in the application didn't include the road and that's the reason for the difference and because we're talking about a rezone here and boundaries and so on, that was felt that it should include all of that and that's why the difference. You see the same thing in the next one and it's the same reason for the difference. Bentley: Thank you. Corrie: Any other questions from Council? Bird: I have none. Corrie: I'll entertain a motion on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on item number 11: Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I make a motion we approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order for the request for rezone of the property for the fire station on Ten .Mile. Rountree: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Anderson second by Mr. Rountree to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law item number 11. Any further discussion? SUPER1NTElVDENT Christine H. Donnell February 4, 1999 Greg Ruddell 6250 W. View Drive Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Mr. Ruddell, ~~~~~~~~ J.q CITY OF I~~IERIDI~:v I received }•our request regarding busing costs for the new middle school site projected for years 1, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 and annualized for inflation. I also received }•our request for an analysis of busing costs if the middle school were to be changed to the Locust Grove site in comparison to busing costs at "another site location near I-84 corridor." To date, the District has responded to almost 20 a-mail inquiries from you regarding the site for the new middle school. In addition, I have discussed the matter with you in person on the phone; our administrator of support services and a member of the Board of Tnistees took atwo-hour tour of the site to hear your point of view on the issue, and the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and I met with you personally for more than two hours, during which we heard and tried to address }•our concerns. At this point, for the District to devote more resources to your inquiries regarding the middle school would not be fair to the issues brought forth by other patrons that also deserve our attention. During the bond election, the location of the proposed middle school site was published on the majority of the printed materials that were distributed to members of our communit}•, including the Fall 1998 edition of The Outlook, which goes to every mailing address within the Meridian School District. The Idaho States» ran also printed a map detailing the location of the proposed school in advance of the bond election. Our community voted to support the bond measure with the knowledge that some of the funds would be used to build a middle school at the proposed site. To change the location of the middle school site now would be to reject the support we received for the bond measure and to reverse the expectations, in regards to the middle school, of our community. The District and the Board of Trustees continue to believe that the new• middle school will be a great asset to the district, and will best meet its stated objective at the location west of Cloverdale Road, which is to reduce overcrowding in our current middle schools, creating a better learning environment for all of our middle school students. In achieving this objective, we will-provide a safe and cost-effective facility for our students, parents and community to enjoy. Thank you for your inquiry. Sincerely, hristine Donnell Superintendent c: Meridian Board of Trustees Idaho Statesman State Board of Education /Meridian Citv Council BOARD OF TRUSTEES Rex Harrison • Wally Hedrick • Holly Houtburg • Da~•id wynkoop • Ste~•e Mann • • From: GRud689177@aol.com Date sent: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:48:07 EST To: donnellc@mailhost.sd02.k12.id.us Copies to: news@idstates.com Subject: Attached Letter Ms. Christine Donnell, and Meridian Board of Trustees Meridian, Idaho 83642 Greetings: We were assured by you, that the school board and you are aware of the fiduciary responsibility to all patrons and taxpayers. You further assured us that you had complied with all fiduciary responsibilities. Since we believe your representations are true, please provide us with the following information: 1. Annual school busing costs to current proposed middle school site. 2. Annual busing cost projection adjusting for inflation, including all fixed and variable costs. This must include projections for 1, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 years, using reasonable baseline information. 3. The annual taxpayer cost for walk in students. 4. Projection for walk in student costs adjusted for inflation for above time periods. 5. Analysis to include different site busing requirements of 95 %, 50 % and 0%. Note: Annual cost adjustments are compounded'based on a national recognized information source. Disclosure of the funding source to pay transportation costs, whether it is district, local, state or federal tax money. Economic analysis of annual costs of busing compared to annual cost of walking to justify the current site selection. Since we have been assured by you in -- 1 -- Fri, 29 Jan 1999 13:40:36 ~ • From: GRud689177~a aol.com Date sent: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 17:58:46 EST To: donnellc@mailhost.sd02.k12.id.us Subject: Attached Letter Christine & School Board: Regarding transportation cost/analysis requests for middle school, another patron requests the same information regarding proposed technical/professional school site, North Locust Grove. Specifically, same' analysis comparing Locust Grove site verses another site location near I-84 corridor, illustrating the long term busing cost differentials between two alternative sites. Thanks much for providing requested information, meeting the duties of protecting. all taxpayers from ever increasing tax burdens. Greg Ruddell f -- 1 -- Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:49:23 • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APRIL 20,.1999 APPLICANT: JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 9 REQUEST: ANNEXATION 8. ZONING AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED MINUTES FROM 4/6/99 CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: r ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ll ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST; INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials pre+e~ ted at~eetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. 1, MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 27 12. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 2 -EAST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD., BETWEEN USTICK AND MCMILLAN ROAD JUST NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD SUB: Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite staff comments first. Shari or Gary. Stiles: Mr.'Mayor and Council this is for a property, north of Summerfield Subdivision and east of Locust Grove Road. The Meridian School District would like to build a charter high school. There has been a little bit of misunderstanding with the public as the Comprehensive Plan does. identify a technical school, but this .charter high school was not even thought about at that time. The legislation was not in effect when the Meridian Comprehensive Plan was developed. The technical school that is referred to in the Comprehensive Plan is being constructed in Boise City and that was the motor repair more of a auto repair, welding, that kind of a school. This school is going to be a professional -more geared towards professional business as far as computers, web site design. I'm sure they'll explain that more to you. The application, the public hearing just after this is the property that is currently contiguous to the City of Meridian. So as a condition of this request for annexation, the Council will need to first approve the annexation of the property just south of this property. But with that we have reviewed the requirements with the applicant, and they have indicated that they will comply with all our ordinance requirements and they can give their presentation. Donnell: Mr. Mayor and Council, I'm Christine Donnell, Superintendent of the Meridian School District, and staff has very clearly defined what our request is for•annexation. Based on our desire to construct a charter high school on that property, we have proceeded through the planning and zoning process, and have received approval. We. did hold a public hearing at their request as we realized neighbors were concerned about what we were doing on that property. We have been sensitive to the neighbors' requests in terms of landscape, berming and lights on that property and we really urge your consideration of this property as we are under a very tight time line. We'd like to open this by the fall of -this fall, '99. So we are under a very tight time line. We have with us tonight our architect who would be happy to share. with you the building design and any other issues that you might have, questions, and we also have two members of our design team for the charter school that can more clearly articulate what this school is about so with that we'd be happy to answer any questions. If you'd like I'll turn it over to Wayne Thowless of Leatham and Krohn to talk about and show you the plan design. Thowless: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, the request before you is annexation of approximately 40 acres on the east side of Locust Grove. The School District's plans for the property in the immediate are construction of one approximately _ - __ j Y ,~~ J Meridian City Council Meeting ~ t~~~'""'"~' April 20, 1999 Page 10 ~ ~ ~~ ~Y ~~Z~ Corrie: Okay, all right. ~ t~~ ~ 4 Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move that we approve the annexation and zoning for the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the annexation and zoning of Joint Meridian School District No. 2. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley .second by Mr. Bird to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for request for annexation and zoning by Meridian School District No. 2. Any further discussion? ROLL CALL VOTE: ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. 11. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: REQUEST FOR REZONE OF 0.578 ACRES FROM R-15 & R-4 TO L-O FOR MERIDIAN FIRE STATION BY CITY OF MERIDIAN -WEST OF NORTH TEN MILE, BETWEEN TETER & MUIRFIELD: Corrie: Mr. Mayor I have a question of what the exact acreage is. On the findings, it says .75 and on the agenda it says .578. Is one a typo? Bird: I think .75 is a typo. Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, Councilman Bentley, the description and the final draft includes the road. The original description in the application didn't include the road and that's the reason for the difference and because we're talking about a rezone here and boundaries and so on, that was felt that it should include all of that and that's why the difference. You see the same thing in the next one and it's the same reason for the difference. Bentley: Thank you. Corrie: Any other questions from Council? Bird: I have none. Corrie: I'll entertain a motion on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on item number 11. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I make a motion we approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order for the request for rezone of the property for the fire station on Ten .Mile. Rountree: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Anderson second by Mr. Rountree to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law item number 11. Any further discussion? • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 28 16,000 square foot charter school building. The long range plan for the property is additional buildings on the site to create a small campus as the school grows and as programs are added to the school. f'd be happy to answer any questions about the design, but on the site plan up there, I realize it's kind of small. The first building that will be constructed is shown there in the southwest corner. It's the building that's shaded and you can see other buildings that may follow in the future shown also. That's the proposed design of the initial building and site plan of that approximately three and half, four acres in the extreme southwest corner where that first phase building will go. I do have two questions or need for clarification with regard to two of the conditions of approval that I'm in receipt of. And would appreciate some clarification on these as well as any questions or comments that you may have regarding the project or the design. Under conditions of approval, item number 1.4 talks about tiling of ditches that are on the property. Along the north property line of the site is a ditch which serves properties further to the west on the west side of Locust Grove. I'm going to go back and change to the site plan to the entire site. The ditch runs the entire length of that north property line which is the property line at the top of the site on that drawing, and of course one of the city's standard requirements is that ditches be tiled on property that's developed. As I mentioned earlier the School District's initial plans for development are just several acres in the extreme southwest corner and for the foreseeable future, the intent to continue to lease as pasture or farm land the most of the balance of the property so the School District would respectfully request that the requirement for tiling that ditch on the north property line be deferred until further more extensive development of the property where students and other uses are in closer contact with that ditch and that farming or grazing on that property has been suspended. The second request for clarification has to do with requirement 1.6 which states that well number 18 needs to be on line prior to any more development in the subject pressure zone of which this property is a part as we understand. As Christine Donnell just mentioned, the School District is on quite a tight time frame with this project and we would actually like to be applying for a building permit early next month on this property, subject to some approvals from the state and ACHD. The building will not be occupied until at the earliest September of this year. In conversation with Gary Smith, he indicates that it's anticipated that well 18 will be on line by around the first of August. So the question is will the City permit this project prior to that well being on line since it will not be occupied until after the well is due to be on line. So those are the two areas that the School District needs some clarification and I would stand for any questions you might have. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I got two questions. How much of that Wayne outside of the site that you're going to build right now, how much of that is going to be left to be farmed and everything even in your site development program you said four or five years before they go on before you start developing the other buildings or how much more will that be not -will be left in farm ground and whatever? Not just the east side but how much MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 29 of the north end from the new school? How much of that site right now are you going to develop? Thowless: Just this quarter right here. Bird: And the rest of it is going to stay farm ground so that ditch has nothing to do with it. Thowless: That's correct. The District does not have a specific build out time frame on further development of the property. Bird: And there is an existing well on that property now, isn't there a water well? Thowless: I can't recall to be honest. Bird: For fire, I'm thinking about the permits down the line here in a month. I know what we're going to run up against there if they don't have some water on the site. Maybe Gary can answer that. Smith: Mr. Mayor, Council members, Councilman Bird, water line has been extended in the Summerfield project to the northwest corner of that subdivision which is the southwest corner of this phase of development. I was just speaking to Fire Chief Bowers and it may be necessary for the School District to install a fire hydrant at that corner in order to facilitate their construction. Thowless: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, our engineer is working on a water line extension which will provide water to a fire hydrant on the site and that is underway as the design of that is underway as we speak. Bird: I just don't want you to have any problems when you come in and get a permit. Cowie: Any other questions? Thowless: Thank you. Cowie: Anyone else would like to issue testimony on this annexation and zoning request? Donahue: Beverly Donahue, 3775 N. Locust Grove. I'll be right across the street from this school. I was never invited to this meeting that everyone had, so this is new to me today. I went down to kind of get some information, and a few concerns I have with the school is I wanted to know how close it was going to be to the road, and then I also wanted to know where the entrance way was going. to be so the driveway is not hitting • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 30 my house when the kids are coming and going from the school, but they said 300 feet so I'm trying to get a picture of this. Bird: Can we see the site plan again? Thowless: The building will sit back approximately 250 feet from the property line on the east side of Locust Grove. Donahue: So is that on the side of the berm? Behind the berm? Thowless: Behind the berm 250 feet. Donahue: Okay. Thowless: We have been in intense negotiations the last couple of weeks with ACHD over the position of what will ultimately be two to three driveway entrances to the property over time as further development occurs where those driveways will occur. ACHD requires that either the driveways be aligned with driveways across the street or be offset by a certain distance based on the speed limit. Based on where this first phase building is going, our current thinking is that it should be at this location as shown on this plan which is across the street from your driveway. The option would be further up Locust Grove which I gather would be your preference. Donahue: Well yeah our neighbors, they have Summerfield Subdivision and all the exits go straight into their living roam. They can't even watch T.V. which you know they were there first. So nothing has been set in stone where the driveways are going to go yet with ACHD? Thowless: We're still in the process of negotiating that. Donahue: Okay, can I also be invited to those meetings just to have my voice in it? Thowless: Their hearing on the matter already occurred. They've stipulated their perimeters and at this point their perimeters to the School District and us as the architect is either to align with driveways across the street or to offset by their required distances. Beyond that, they're not taking a position on it. They're giving us those two options, so we would be happy to entertain your concerns and discuss the matter with you further. Donahue: Well you know I'm looking for future if this school goes to 1200 kids, and they all leave the school, that's 1200 cars I could have aimed right at my house twice a day and that is a major concern where I live and for my safety. Also my other concern was when we built Summerfield there were a lot of things that were promised that never MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 31 happened and my concern is now we're moving down farther with the School District. We were suppose to have sidewalks which we do have put in, but we never had the bike lanes put in and if the School District is only going to go in shifts, how about the kids that are coming from the north? There's no bike lanes, no sidewalks. How are those kids that are 9th grade or 10th grade going to be able to get access to that school walking on the side of the road? And I know it's probably another concern with ACRD because our kids safety should come first, because I can't even walk down the side of my road. Thank you. Corrie: Thank you. Anyone else would like to issue testimony? Yes, sir? Davis: My name is Tom Davis and I live at 2740 E. Ustick Road, Meridian. I own the property that is east of the School District's and also Hollister's and also Summerfield Subdivision, and. I testified at the last one, and the school they recommended two different fencing. I asked for a six foot chain link fence to keep some of the building construction and stuff because when they built Summerfield, we've been picking up building material and plastic bags and everything else out of our agriculture fields for three years and nobody has ever offered to help, and I got to keep it out of there because I have a grade A dairy and anyway they gave him two alternatives and the one on the property line is the one I prefer between the school property land and my land, and they wouldn't let me testify when Mr. Hollister came up the first time and anyway that all hooks together and we were requesting a chain link fence from the corner of Summerfield all the way back to the north property line of the School District. If you have any questions; I'd be glad to try to answer them. Any questions? Bird: I'd like to see him point out on the site the site where his place is and what he's talking about. I think I know, but I'd like to know definite. Are you talking about the northern boundary there where the ditch runs? Davis: This line here is my property line and then Mr. Hollister's is right here and Summerfield is right here. I requested a six foot chain link fence across here and in those recommendations there, they gave him an alternative I believe of putting a chain link fence some place here; wasn't it? Then over to Mr. Hollister. I would prefer to have the fence on the property line, because like they said later this piece of ground here may turn into a soccer field or a park or something and from-the building site the people that come to work the construction come to work and stuff with their lunches and everything, the wind comes from the west and like I said we've been trying to keep building material and plastics and tinfoil and everything else out of there. (End of Tape) Davis: ...if you go out there right now, there is an (Inaudible) there and there is plastic bags all over that infield right now. • MER{DIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 32 Bird: They haven't even started any construction that is coming from Summerfield? Davis: Well, I don't know where it's coming from right now. Summerfield is pretty well built. It's slowed down. I-we don't have to pick up as much stuff now. I suppose it does come when the wind blows that way. I don't know where that comes from right now. Bird: I have no other questions. Corrie: All right, thank you Tom. Anyone else like to issue testimony? Okay, would you like to answer that question about the six foot fence on the north or the east side property? Thowless: As I understand the way the two options were written in the staff report as conditions of approval. The first option was that fencing be required from the northeast corner of the property to this southeast corner along this property line dividing the schools property from the bulk of Mr. Hollisters and then from this property corner down to this southeast corner of the school site, so these three legs of the property. The alternative given was to negotiate with Mr. Hollister to run the six foot chain link fence from here to here and then the length of his east property line that is contiguous with Mr. Davis's. We have not entered in to any negotiations with Mr. Hollister regarding fencing behind his property at this time. We don't see any need to do that, unless it would be strongly felt that that would be preferable. We believe that we can meet the requirement set by P & Z by fencing on our own property. Corrie: Okay, since there is no other from the public who would like to testify, I'll entertain a motion to adjourn the public hearing. Bird: I'll move that. Corrie: Motion is moved, do I hear a second? Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded that we close the public hearing on Item No. 12. All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. Corrie: Discussions? Bentley: Mr. Mayor, question for staff. Gary, have you got a firm date on Well 18? MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 33 Smith: They are finishing up the drilling clean up right now on the site. The contractor is poised and ready to get started on the well house, they're anticipating somewhere around 120 days to complete that project, so that puts it at the middle of August. Bentley: Thank you. Corrie: Other discussion? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Recommendation to the City Council from the Planning and Zoning, how do you wish to... Rountree: There is a couple parts of this recommendation that t think need to be cleared up. One was pointed out by the applicant on page 2, item 1.4 talking about the tiling of the ditch. I can understand their desire to keep that open for some point in time, we need to come up with some kind of a factor that would accommodate that. I don't know if its until such time is the development is complete, or until such time as 50% of the development has gone forward. That's something that we need to discuss and modify. The other thing item 1.8 on page, I guess it's page 4, 1.8A. It's very unclear to me what that says (Inaudible) testimony that the applicant gave. I would suggest that we strike the first part of that first paragraph because it seems to me that it's unclear that or there is two options in the first option. One would be to fence phase A or the first building or permanently fence the property and then the other option of 1.8B, so I think that point needs to be clarified. My preference would be to have a permanent fence established on the property line at this point, for discussion. Clarification for me from city attorney that we would need findings and ordinance and are we looking at a development agreement for this? I don't think we need one. Corrie: Mr. Gigray? Gigray: That's a matter of your discretion. I didn't see any requirement or request by the Planning and Zoning Commission for development agreement either as far as articulating a reference point by which would precipitate tiling of the ditch, as a matter of council to the mayor and council. I would recommend that you might consider development on a certain portion of the parcel so that we know when it applies and when it doesn't apply. !t would appear to me looking at the site plan that if you could draw a line through the middle of the parcel if there were development on the north half of the parcel, that would be development that would be in closer proximity to that ditch that might effect that and if they develop on the south side, wouldn't require it. That would be easy to write as a condition. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 34 Corrie: Discussion on the question Mr. Rountree? Rountree: I guess a procedural point then. Would we then need to modify these recommendations made by P & Z and then incorporate those into the finding? Gigray: We will prepare new findings for your consideration. It will incorporate these conditions and if you direct me to modify certain conditions, I will do so and then you will have the findings as well as the ordinance of annexation for your consideration at the next meeting. Bentley: I've got a question for Charlie. On your fencing, are you talking-your preference is to fence the entire property? Bird: No, no. Rountree: The eastern side that abuts the Davis property. Bird: You are not going to include the Hollister side, back on that corner? Rountree: I would call that the east side of the property line (Inaudible). Bird: North of Hollister and the east side of Hollister? Rountree: Um-hmm. Bird: You are counting the little jog? Rountree: The zigzag or jog, or whatever you want to call it that would constitute the entire eastern boundary of that property would be chain link fence to the height of six feet. Bird: Northern (Inaudible) boundary too of Hollisters. Rountree: But that's Hollisters property. I'm talking about the school district's property. Bird: Okay, east end of the school- districts property. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I also would be in agreement that we draw a fine as the city attorney stated on the tiling of the ditch, draw a line to the middle of the property then proceed north and then the tiling begins. Rountree: I move that we instruct the city attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to incorporate the recommendations of Planning and Zoning with MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 6, 1999 PAGE 35 the modifications of item 1.4 as it relates to irrigation ditch tiling and align the established approximate center on a west-east basis that any development north of that line would require the tiling of the ditches any development south of that line ditch tiling would be deferred and that item 1.8A be modified and it be clear that the option is the fencing of the entire eastern boundary of the school district property. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree seconded by Mr. Bird to direct the city attorney to draw up the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with the modifications stated on record. Any further discussion on the motion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion as stated? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. ITEM NO. 13: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 10.02 FOR PROPOSED YUKON SUBDIVISION BY JAMES AND KAREN HOLLISTER: Corrie: So we will have item no. 13 as a continued public hearing. I will open the public hearing back for the continued public hearing and Shari do you want to give us the run down real quickly and then Mr. Hollister or Mrs. Hollister, either one. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and council you have heard quite a bit about this property already, as a condition of this annexation I think that we should include that the east property boundary of this property also be fenced prior to any construction on any of the schools property. We have received a letter from Mr. Hollister and I would like to clarify for the record that the City of Meridian did not request this annexation, it was required in order for the school district to be contiguous to the City of Meridian, but just to make sure that everybody understands that the City of Meridian did not request this annexation to be submitted. Other than that, there are no plans for a subdivision, it was a little confusing because it has been advertised as the Yukon Subdivision, it is only a request for annexation and zoning, there is no subdivision request at this time. I believe the name Yukon Subdivision was part of a previous application in the county for some kind of a subdivision of the property, but no plans have been submitted for any subdivision and I guess I'll let the applicant or his representative make any presentation that they have. STILLMAN ANDERSON, LEATHAM & KROHN. Anderson: The Hollisters are requesting clarification on item 1.5 of the recommendations that are on page 4. As they are .not planning on a subdivision or doing any development at this time, their concern is do they have to the any of the ditches or drainage that crosses their property? Also, under Planning and Zoning Commission further advisement on 1.8 they are in opposition to a five foot buffer planter BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE ) Case No. AZ-98-105 APPLICATION OF MERIDIAN ) JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND 2, THE APPLICATION -FOR ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ANNEXATION AND ZONING ) DECISION AND ORDER OF 40.55 ACRES ON THE EAST ) GRANTING APPLICATION FOR SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ) ANNEXATION AND ZONING NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD ) SUBDIVISION, MERIDIAN, IDAHO The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for public hearing on April 6, 1999, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., and Christine Donnell, Superintendent of joint School District No. 2, and Wayne Thowless, of Leatham and Krohn, Architect for Joint School District No. 2, having appeared and testified in favor of the application, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report, and Beverly Donahue and Tom Davis testified as affected property owners, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 1 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The notice of public hearing on the application for annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to said public hearing scheduled for April 6, 1999, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been. mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred (300') feet of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the April 6, 1999, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511, and §§11-2-416E and 11-2-417A, Municipal Code of the City of Meridian. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and development ordinances codified at Title 11, Municipal Code of the City of Meridian, and all current zoning maps thereof, and the Comprehensive Plan of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 2 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) ~ i City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. b29, January 4,1994, and maps and the ordinance Establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 4. The property is approximately 40.55 acres in size. The property is located on the east side of Locust Grove Road, between Usticlc and McMillan Road just north of the Summerfield Subdivision. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is Meridian Joint School District No.2, of 911 Meridian St., Meridian, Idaho. 6. Applicant is the owner of record. 7. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as Rural Transition (RT), and is vacant. 8. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as Low Density Residential (R-4). 9. The proposed site of the subject property is located north of the Summerfield Subdivision, south of the Heritage Subdivision and is surrounded by undeveloped land to the east and west. Centennial High School is located approximately two (2) miles to the east of the subject site. 10. The subject property is bordered to the south by the city limits of the City of Meridian. 1 1. The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 3 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDLAN.SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) 12. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zone, development and use of the subject parcel is otherwise consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, in that, the project facilitates a stated community value contained in: 12.1 The Foreward at page 1, which is "Prevent school overcrowding/enhance education services; and I2.2 Under the section entitled "School Facilities" by meeting the School Siting Goal Statement by its proximity to existing residential subdivisions, the size of the parcel and the fact that it is not proposed to be sited next to incompatible uses or hazards as set forth at pages 13 and 14; and 12.3 Under the section entitled "Land Use" Comprehensive Plan Map objectives nos. 3, 6 and 7 at page 22; and 12.4 In Land Use Goal Statements §§ 1.5U, 1.8U, 2.2U and 2.3U at page 23. 13. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: Construct and utilize a charter high school . 14. The Applicant's requested zoning of the subject real property as Low Density Residential (R-4) is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. 15. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 4 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) affect the consideration of this application. 16. The land within the proposed annexation area is contiguous to the present city limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 17. The property which is~the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 18. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 19. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed: Adopt the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Assistant City Engineer Recommendations as follows: 19.1 Sanitary sewer serviceability to this site is questionable since this parcel is on the fringe of the service a"rea of existing mains. Applicant's engineer shall verify the feasibility of service. 19.2 Water service to this parcel could be extended from the existing main located in Locust Grove Road. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 5 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • 19.3 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing or adjacent to the property shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigationldrainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. Due to the fact that only the southwestern portion of the subject parcel is to be developed the requirements of this provision shall not appertain to the ditch that runs parallel and adjacent to the northern boundary of the subject property until such time as the applicant develops any portion of the subject property that is north of any point that is midway between the northern and southern boundary of the subject parcel at which time the provisions of this requirement shall then apply and require the tiling of said ditch. - 19.4 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. Adopt the City of Meridian Water Department Recommendation as follows: 19.5 City Well 18 needs to be on line prior to the occupancy of the subject development. Adopt the Central District Health Department recommendations as follows: 19.6 Central sewer will need to be made available to the subject project. 20. It is found that if the developer pays for the requested improvements and complies with the conditions set forth in these findings of fact no. 16, and all subparts, the economic welfare of the City and its residents and tax and rate payers will be protected, which requirement shall be included in a development agreement, a FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 6 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) condition of annexation and zoning designation. 21. It is found that the following are development considerations, which must be taken into account, in order to assure the proposed development is designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a manner which is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing, or intended character of the general vicinity, in order to assure that the proposed use will not change the essential character of the affected vicinity and will insure that the proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing, or future neighboring uses, particularly considering the impact of proposed development on potential to produce excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare and odors: 21.1 That Beverly Donahue is concerned with the location of the entryway to the subject development and desires that it not be adjacent to her driveway, which issues should be resolved with the applicant but are subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada County Highway District; and 21.2 That Beverly Donahue is concerned about the lack of bike and pedestrian lanes north of the subject parcel, which issues should also be reviewed with and subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada County Highway District; and 21.3 That Tom Davis farms his parcel, which lies adjacent and to the east of the subject property, and he is concerned with blowing trash from the development and use, and in order to prevent the same requests that the applicant construct a six (6') foot permanent chain link fence on the east boundary of the subject property for the entire length of the eastern boundary as it abuts the Davis property. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 7 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • • 21.4 That the subject annexation and zoning be limited to school educational use and specifically exclude residential subdivisions. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian has authority to annex real property upon written request for annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city boundaries and that said property lies within the area of city impact as provided by Idaho Code Section 50-222. The Municipal Code of the City of Meridian Section 11- 2-417 provides the City may annex real property that is within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 3. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975', codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by the adoption of `Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. No. 629, January 4, 1994. 4. The following are found to be pertinent provisions of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan and are applicable to this Application: 4.1 The Foreward at page 1, which is "Prevent school overcrowding/enhance education services; and 4.2 Under the section entitled "School Facilities" by meeting the School Siting Goal Statement by its proximity to existing residential FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 8 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • • subdivisions, the size of the parcel and the fact that it is not proposed to be sited next to incompatible uses or hazards as set forth at pages 13 and 14; and 4.3 Under the section entitled "Land Use" Comprehensive Plan Map objectives nos. 3, 6 and 7 at page 22; and 4.4 In Land Use Goal Statements §§ 1.5U, 1.8U, 2.2U and 2.3U at page 23. 5. The requested zoning of Low Density Residential (R-4) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-2-408 B. 14. as follows: (R-4~ Low Density Residential District: Only single-family dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single- family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non- residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. 6. That Section 11-2409, ZONING SCHEDULE OF USE CONTROL, B, Commercial, lists commercial uses allowed in the various zoning districts of the City; that schools are listed as permitted uses in the Low Density Residential (R-4) District. 7. That the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under LAND USE, Mixed-Use Area at Eagle Road, in 5.16U, states that all development requests will be FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 9 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) • .~ subject to development review and conditional use permit processing to insure neighborhood compatibility. 8. By authority of the City of Meridian under the Comprehensive Plan, a conditional use permit is required for Applicant to construct and operate any stores or facilities on this parcel of land. 9. Since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the ,City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. See Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P2d 1075 (1983). 10. The development of the annexed land, if annexed, shall meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian including, but not limited to: Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements; Section 11-9-605 M, which pertains to the piping of ditches; and Section 11-9-606 B 14., which pertains to pressurized irrigation systems. 11. The development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Zoning and Subdivision and Development Ordinance of the City of Meridian. 12. Section 11-2417 D of the Zoning and Development Ordinance provides in part as follows: If property is annexed and zoned, the City may require or permit, as a condition of the zoning, that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject property. If a commitment is required or permitted, it shall be recorded in the office of the Ada County Recorder and shall take effect upon the adoption of the ordinance FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 10 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) ~~~ annexing and zoning the,property„or.prior if agreed to by the owner of the parcel. ,„ DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED, UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING ., , FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF, LAW, the City Council does ti ~ ~ a hereby Order and this does Order: , 1. This application. is for annexation, and. zoning of 40.55 acres- located on the east side of Locust Grove Road between Usticlc and McMillian Roads, just north of Summerfield Subdivision, Meridian, Idaho. The legal description shall be prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor, Licensed by the State of Idaho, and shall conform to all the provisions of the City of Meridian Resolution~No. 58. The legal description for annexation must place this parcel contiguous to the Corporate City Limits per Ordinance No. 686. # > . 2. That'the City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate ordinance. for the annexation and zoning designation. (R-4) Low Density Residential Ordinance shall not be finally approved by the City Council until provisions of parts 1 and 3 of this order have been met; and 3. Developer enter into a Development Agreement, that provides in the event the conditions therein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be subject to de-annexation, with the Cityyof Meridian which provides for the ~ , following conditions of development to-wit: : ,. 3.1 Sanitary sewer serviceability to this site is questionable since this parcel is on the fringe of the service area wof existing mains. Applicant's engineer shall verify the feasibility of service. . ~. a 3.2 Water service to this parcel could be extended from the existing main located in Locust Grove Road. Y ~: 3.3 ~ Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing,or adjacent to the. property-shall be tiled per City,,Ordinance 11-9-605.M. The ditches to FINDINGS'OF FACT,AND CONCLUSIONS~OF LAW -Page 11 aAND~DECISION~AND`ORDER.GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with°written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. Due to thefact that only the southwestern portion of the subject parcel is to be developed the requirements of this provision shall not appertain to the ditch that runs parallel and adjacent to the northern boundary of the subject property until such time as the applicant develops any portion of the subject property that is north of any point that is midway between the northern and southern boundary of the subject parcel at which time the provisions of this requirement shall then apply and require the tiling of said ditch. 3.4 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3.5 City Well 18 needs to be on line prior to the occupancy of the subject development. 3.6 Central sewer will need to be made available to the subject project. 3.7 Beverly Donahue is concerned with the location of the entryway to the subject development and desires that it not be adjacent to her driveway, which issues should be resolved with the applicant but are subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada County Highway District; and 3.8 That Beverly Donahue is concerned about the lack of bike and pedestrian lanes north of the subject parcel, which issues should also be reviewed with and subject to the restrictions and the regulations and jurisdiction of the Ada County Highway District; and 3.9 That Tom Davis farms his parcel, which lies adjacent and to the east of the subject property, and he is concerned with blowing trash from the development and use, and in order to prevent the same requests that the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page. 12 AND DECISION. AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) -- -- - applicant construct a six (6') foot permanent chain link fence on the east boundary of the subject property for the entire length of the eastern boundary as it abu"ts the Davis property. 3.10 That the subject annexation and zoning be limited to school educational use and specifically exclude residential subdivisions. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 13 AND,DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) \~ i ~•' NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person is a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the annexation and zoning and who may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title. 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held ~ ~~ 1999. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN ANDERSON VOTED COUNCILMAN BIRD VOTED COUNCILMAN BENTLEY VOTED COUNCILMAN ROUNTREE VOTED MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED, DATED: ~ Zo FINDINGS OF :FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 14 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR,ANNEXATION AND ZONING MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT N0..2 (40.55 ACRES) ~> ~~ ~, MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED:. Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department and the Public Works Department. ~~~ ;~~'~' Dated: ~`~2©~~ By. City Clerlc \`.~~`~"`tk=~ ~.r'`'''~,; a. , ; =~.~ ,fir .,t ~ ~~ w..,,,~r~ ~ >;: msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\IVleridian Joint S~~hoo1 No. 2 ( om~ecOrd.Fcs.frm ~1 ~~ -_ ~~llii;llti t1lt1~~~` FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 15 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING / MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 (40.55 ACRES) MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APRIL 6, 1999 APPLICANT: JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REQUEST: ANNEXATION 8~ ZONING (NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD SUB.) AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED MINUTES AND INFORMATION SUBMITTED SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED RECOMMENDATION FROM P & Z REVIEWED REVIEWED SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~ ,~,. SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~ ~~ '~~ ~~ n ,~~ BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials pr sented at gubli~ c~m~e jtings shall become property of the City of Meridian. C o~Q,~cP 11-Y,a.~.. ,~,, MERIDIAN PLAN~G AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 199 PAGE 13 MacCoy: Yes we did. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. ITEM NO, 3: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2-EAST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD, BETWEEN USTICK AND MCMILLAN ROAD, JUST NORTH OF SUMMERFIELD SUB: MacCoy: I would like to stress that this is strictly for annexation & zoning and we are not talking about layouts or plans or anything else with this thing. Staff? Stiles: Chairman MacCoy, commissioners, this request is for 40.55 acres by Meridian Joint School District No. 2 to be zoned R-4. The R-4 zoning would permit a public school in this location. l would like to state that the vocational technical school that is mentioned in the- Comprehensive Plan is not the school that is proposed here. What they are proposing is a charter school, charter high school that-they will give a further explanation of that I'm sure, but just wanted to let everybody know that they need to limit their comments to the issue of annexation and zoning. There is not another issue here, there has come up some concern about siting of the middle school and wanting to change locations, this is not the appropriate forum to bring up those comments. If that is your intent in attending tonight, I would ask that you not bother to comment because this is strictly for annexation and zoning. If you've got issues with the siting and what they are doing there, that needs to come up before the school district. With your review of this application, we would support review of the initial building that they are proposing to be done at staff level and that any future buildings on the site would require processing through a conditional use permif process. I not Mr. Davis's concern about the fencing and the trash. What they have contemplated at this time is strictly, primarily the western most portion of the property. I think that a six foot fence at the property line should be able to contain their debris from any of their construction. Nine foot fencing is not permitted in this zone. They would require a variance for any kind of fencing over six feet high. We do understand the problems that have been created for Mr. Davis and would encourage him to contact our office any time he has a problem and we would even be willing to come out ourselves and help you with the trash if that continues to be a problem. The city could require that a development agreement be entered into as part of this application. I don't necessarily think we have to do that. It may be as part of the conditional use permit process we will be able to control how that development proceeds and make sure that the appropriate acceleration, deceleration lanes are provided through the Ada County Highway District. The audience also needs to note to that the city does not control roadways, I don't have in my packet comments from Ada County Highway District, but the school district will be required to meet any conditions of Ada County Highway District prior to obtaining a building permit for this site. ~. MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 14 MacCoy: Thank you Shari. Bruce do you have anything that you want to add? No? Okay. I will answer one other thing, there was a question here or statement made that sometime years ago things didn't happen. As of the later part of this year we have in place several control officers that have authority and we do issue citations and if they are not adhered too, it goes into legal form. So we have a lot more of a stick now than we ever had before. So we plan to enforce the law as we see it. I will open the public hearing and will the applicant like to speak before this project (Inaudible). WAYNE THOWLESS, 1735 FEDERAL WAY, BOISE, ID. Thowless: I'm an architect with Leatham & Krohn Architects, I represent the Meridian School District this evening. I'll make a couple of comments and get some direction from you in terms of how you would like us to proceed. We do have some drawings of the proposed facility on the property in question here tonight. If you feel it's appropriate to the discussion and any questions or concerns that you have, we would be more than happy to share them with you, they are architectural drawings. If that's not an issue that you want to deal with this evening, you can so direct me. We also have Sally Harris of the Meridian School District that is available to answer any questions that you may have and make some comment regarding the nature of this proposed Charter School, given that is somewhat of a unique institution. Many people here tonight, you on the commission as well as members of the audience may not have an accurate understanding of the nature of the program that will be offered there. MacCoy: To answer the first part of this, since we are talking annexation and zoning as you have heard us talk about, that is our key point tonight, we would like to know in verbal form some of the details if you want to offer them to us. We are not looking at your buildings yet, that comes later for another meeting and at that time expect drawings and lot plan and those things to be shown to us. 4 think this evening it's just what was said, it's a basic item for you. Thowless: Okay, very briefly then, of the property in question, the school district at the present time has plans to develop approximately 3.5 or 4 acres of the property in the extreme southwest corner. On that property they intend to build a 16,000 square foot single story building and the parking lot and driveway to accommodate approximately 100 cars and bus loading and unloading. The school will house-this initial building will house a maximum of 200 students. The-our firm, and the Meridian School District have been working with other agencies, such as Ada County Highway Department and are fully prepared to comply with any conditions that might be proposed, that are in the best interest of the project and the neighborhoods. I don't think that unless there are questions, there is probably too much more to add without going into details of the design of the project. MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 15 MacCoy: Okay, commissioners? Borup: Nothing at this time. De Weerd: Nothing at this time. Nelson: I would just ask-you mentioned a plan for 4 acres out of the 40 acres. Thowless: That's correct. Nelson: Is there any known plans for the remainder of that property? Thowless: The district doesn't have any specific .plans at this time. It's presently in farming, but any final decision on the immediate use of the property until further development is necessary and it would be up to the (Inaudible) school district and they have made no decisions at this time. MacCoy: Thank you. Anyone here like to speak in favor of this item? De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I have a question for Shari. If there is a proposed building for this annexation, why do we not have a preliminary plat or any information on that? Stiles: The ordinance doesn't specifically require that they have building plans as part of an annexation and zoning. 1 know that normally you do see plans particularly in those mixed plan use areas designated in the Comprehensive Plan which requires they submit a conditional use permit as part of the annexation. We haven't asked them to come in with the conditional use permit for this because their initial plan is for the one building and in the future if they propose. additional buildings, we would ask that they would have to go through the conditional use process. De Weerd: But if this is the forum that residents have to comment on the building, we don't even know what is proposed to respond to any concerns or-I guess I feel disadvantaged. MacCoy: That comes later, that's the thing about it, as they bring it forward in the next segment-we get a chance to see what they are doing. Borup: I think that is the question, we are talking about annex-this is one parcel, it's not really a subdivision being created is it? Stiles: No. MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 16 (END OF TAPE) Borup: ...of entire parcel, they are proposing buildings on their single parcel. MacCoy: So what are you saying then? Borup: Well, staff requested earlier that building and plan approval be handled on a staff level. So this is the only forum. Unless we decide otherwise. MacCoy: Let me ask Shari this question, it's on your level to start with, but it comes back to us as a group as to what kind of buildings we put up and how they all go together and so on. Stiles: That's entirely up to Planning and Zoning Commission, if it's your desire that this come back to you for the initial building that they are proposing to review, I mean it can be at staff level. The architect may want to address the type of construction they are proposing, but I don't know if they have anything solid in place. MacCoy: I wouldn't think so tonight, but I would like to put on your cuff or board or whatever, that they do come back after they have gone through the material with you people so that we have a chance to make comment on it. Stiles: Typically as you are aware, when we do have the site plan reviews, we do put those on the agenda, but that is not a public hearing and the public is not part of that discussion. MacCoy: They can't be involved in the answers and questions, but they can be here to see and hear what goes on, it's an open meeting. De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I guess the only other question I would have then is where is the four acres placed on this property? Stiles: It would be on the southwest portion of the property. MacCoy: Okay do you want to come back and answer that before we move on. Thowless: Approximately in square in proportion in the immediate southwest corner of the property. Mr. Chairman if I could add one other comment related to nthe discussion about process this evening. The Meridian School District would very much like to have this facility opened for school in the fall of this year. Consequently anything that could be done to expedite the process would be greatly appreciated by the school district. We are fully prepared tonight to answer any and all questions regarding the nature of the project, the design of the project, of course that's your decision whether you choose to have us do that. MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 17 I don't think there is any question tonight that we would be unable to answer because we have gone quite far in terms of the development of this proposal, thank you. MacCoy: I just don't care to get into long dissertation on materials and placing and so on tonight for an annexation. Rossman: The point should be made that it is not entirely relevant to this proceeding, it's a conforming use, there is no requirement in the ordinance that they submit for an application for conditional use permit on their buildings on this particular property. If the commission wants to make it a requirement of the annexation and zoning that the plans be submitted for staff approval, or even brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission, they can do that. The ordinance does not require it, so that's why you don't have plans and building requirements, your building information in your packets. MacCoy: That's right, I agree with you. Over here we had a lady coming up to speak in favor. DARLA HARRIS, 901 MERIDIAN ROAD, SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE, MERIDIAN, ID. Harris: I'm speaking in favor just very briefly I would like to tell you that this charter school is a 9-12 high school with a technology focus. That would be the age of students that we are appealing to, those that would be very interested in pursuing technology as possible career. The focus would be on all areas, information systems, and graphic communications. That would be the student population that we would be appealing to and you heard Mr. Thowless say it would be a maximum number of 200 students at capacity. I feel that it would be very appropriate to be on that site and annexation would be a great help to us in developing that school, thank you. MacCoy: Before you leave there, I think one of the things that a lot of people have gotten a misinterpretation by the press, or by word of mouth that it was going to be (Inaudible) vocational school, which everybody thinks about as welding and car repair and so on, you are telling us to the public here that it is a different type of school entirely. Harris: It is. Our intent is that the curriculum that would be offered would allow students to have a regular high school diploma as well as achieve 12 college credits while they are at our school. It would be focused and integrated around the high technology jobs and careers that are available. Our students will be prepared to go right into industry to take those wonderful jobs and careers, we also have them prepared to go into post secondary education if that's what they choose to do, either technical or four year. So we believe that by integrating the MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 18 curriculum and making it focused and applied in those areas of technology that we will be able to do that. This is a project you need to know too that has been underway for three years. It's a dreamt that we've had for three years. We've got a group of parents, teachers and students met and gave us input in on it and then a group of teachers that have been working for a couple of years as a project design committee and with the passage of the charter school legislation last year, it allowed us a vehicle to fund this. The Meridian School Board gave us their blessing and permission to start this school in October 26, 1998 after a public hearing and with their support as our sponsor we are going to be able to bring this school up. As you know charter schools are public schools and receive public school funding for their operation. So through the district support we are going to be able to overcome some of the difficulties that the other charter schools around have been experiencing in terms of acquiring a building and we will be contracting with the district for transportation services for food support services, probably for some accounting functions. So that support is allowing us to proceed with this project very quickly. MacCoy: Okay, thanks for the additional information. Harris: Thank you. MacCoy: Anybody else on the positive side right now that would like to talk? Good evening sir, long time no see. BOB HALEY, 577 EAST LINKERSHIM, MERIDIAN, ID. Haley: Mr. Chairman and commissioners, just a word of this selection of this site. As Ms. Harris mentioned we've been working on this project for about three years and as former superintendent I can tell you that it is becoming more and more difficult to find land in this area for the schools that are going to be necessary to serve the kids. As we develop this dream of servicing kids from all of our high schools, we had to look very closely at a central type of site where the kids could come in from the other schools. We very carefully selected this site, we also attempted before purchase to spend several months, almost a year in reviewing this with various agencies that would be involved in this final decision, including discussion with City Council members and highway districts and so forth. So we tried very, very hard to if you will, jump through all the hoops that we knew we would have to, to get permission to use this. In the very early stages there was comment in one meeting that this would be a vocational high school, that's probably where that got started in that whole process. Under the state definition, it is technically called a professional technical-charter high school with a specific focus. Hopefully we can get this approved and move on.~ Hopefully we did talk to all the agencies necessary before we made this purchase of land. MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 19 MacCoy: Any questions for Bob? Okay thanks Bob. Anybody else on the plus side here, positive side? All right we will turn the coin the other way and anybody here who wants to speak on the other side of the fence can come forward. Is there a spokesperson out there? GARY ELLIOT, 1835 EAST PARADISE LANE, MERIDIAN, ID. Elliott: My question concerns the zoning R-4 zoning. If we are only-we've got 40 acres out there, they are going to build on four acres, do we have the right to know the intent as to why they are zoning R-4, which is my understanding four residential structures per acre. The last thing we want to see in Heritage Sub is another subdivision blasting up behind us. So, I don't know if there is somebody who can answer as to why we're choosing R-4 zoning. MacCoy: Well, there is two questions that you've asked. For the first one, Shari do you want to talk about the R-4 before we move on? Stiles: They have requested the R-4 zoning because public schools is a permitted use in that zone. There were other zones that they could have requested, but they did choose the R-4 zone as-there are many other zones that would .permit public schools R-8, R-15, R-40 and a T-E zone, but staff did not feel it was appropriate that they would apply for a higher density that would cause even more concern for the adjacent residential neighborhoods. It should also be noted that sewer is not available at this time to support any kind of subdivision in that area. The number of homes, they are going to be very tight right now to serve the one building that they are proposing with sewer service at this time. There is a major trunk line that would need to be constructed to-that would have to come all the way from Ten Mile Road through to this Locust Grove Road in order to support anything major like that. So that's the only reason they requested the R-4, is because of the other zones where it is permitted. Also, our ordinance requires anymore than one building on a lot would have to be-they would have to develop that as a conditional use through a planned development. So you would have another opportunity at that time. Anytime more than one building is proposed on the lot to see their plan. Elliott: So the intent, do we get to know the intent of the other 36 acres? MacCoy: I'm going to ask that question in a moment here. Dr. Haley do you want to come forward and- talk about what is going to happen next? Borup: Mr. Chairman, maybe while he is coming up also, R-4 is the lowest density zoning that is available. MacCoy: That's right. MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 20 Stiles: Yes. Borup: So the only other way to go is higher densities. Haley: Mr. Chairman, commissioners, the site was originally purchased in that size in order to accommodate a number of buildings each of which would house approximately 200 students with a specific focus all of which could be classified as charter schools. In the plan that we have sketched out with the architect, there could be in fact six buildings in total very similar to the one that we have designed at this point. Somewhat in a radius and in the center a seventh building that would be a building to take care of media center, lunch room, that kind of thing. Each of those six buildings would have a different focus. This one happens to be in the area of technology, the next one might be in the area of health occupations, and so on. MacCoy: So what you are saying is that we have a campus when we finish that. A mini campus like you would have for college for example. Haley: I would anticipate that this is something that would not evolve in a year or two, something that would probably evolve over a period of somewhere five to ten years as each one of these clusters or focus is developed. MacCoy: Any questions from commissioners? Okay. Thanks Dr. Haley. GREG RUDDELL, 6250 VIEW DRIVE, MERIDIAN, ID. Ruddell: I'm going to speak tonight in general terms of the Comprehensive Plan. Tammy said it best up here when she made the comment about where do these people get to address these concerns. We aren't even going to get to see this building. The district has put out some information or at times represented 1,500 students. Well, I'll challenge you 40 acres of land is a full fledge school. It's capable of being the same size at capacity as any of their other high schools, which is 2,000 to 2,200 depending on building configurations; etc. It's not a typical brick and mortar school. Should a charter school doesn't work as was explained in an email by (Inaudible) and the school district, they are metal buildings with stucco exterior glass doors. I think she described them look a lot like offices. Should this charter school not work, what are they going to do with these facilities? You have an office building in a residential zone, non- conforming use on an R-4, but back to the Comprehensive Plan, I think it's kind of unfair to split this Comprehensive Plan up into little segments and not consider the total impact of all the sections which starts from the community all the way through transportation, the environment, it speaks to all those things. Under school siting statements, it says schools and subdivision developments shall be jointly planned to ensure mutual benefits and neighborhood identity. It specifically speaks to elementary and intermediate schools. School sites shall be MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 21 talked about safety of children, talks about access, pedestrian bicycle for children within their residential neighborhoods. Increased traffic should be discouraged on streets where existing elementary schools are located. We have a school up here that they are proposing, approximately say 1,500 students from as Mr. Haley described, that's a district wide school, from Star to the Kuna border to Lake Hazel to Silver Sage. These kids are all going to be driving not arterially, or major streets, but they are going to be driving these back roads to get to these schools. MacCoy: Or bus. Ruddell: Or bus, but generally a lot of high school students provide their own transportation. We've been told that part of the school is going to be a work study program that these kids will go off campus for work training at Micron or whatever. Do you want 1,000 kids going to Micron down Locust Grove? These are residential streets. MacCoy: I'm not sure you will have that, but go ahead. De Weerd: Sir, I believe right now we are talking four acres and 200 students. Ruddell: Lets just disclose what they are doing. As you said... De Weerd: Now, if we make it a condition that they have a conditional use permit for any additional buildings... Ruddell: Once it gets going it's hard to stop. It's just like somebody said, where do you stop it? There is no place to stop this. Staff has recommended that they approve the building at the staff level, which I understand that you disagree with, but if staff gets their recommendation, these people out here aren't going to even have something to say about the building design. If we go with-if you go with staff recommendation. MacCoy: Let me put something in there, because the staff is qualified and the group that you will be seeing, a number of them are engineers and architects themselves and you will get a pretty nice piece for the public. Ruddell: Okay, as we come into the 21St Century, we've come out of the typical historical vocational trades into the computer high technical trades. Well the Comprehensive Plan isn't using a politically correct term for the 21St Century. This is a 1990 term, instead of a-and where it says that these vocational schools, professional schools, where you are going to have kids transported or access from throughout the community, there is only one school in the whole Meridian School District, this school should be sited where these transportation MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 ' PAGE 22 to it, has easy access to the interstate, to the south county, to the north county. Here we have this thing in the residential neighborhood. Borup: Could you expand on that a little bit sir? This is a section line road. Ruddell: Yes, but it is on the Ada Planning Map as a minor collector. Borup: Collector? Ruddell: Arterial. It's a minor, it's the fourth one down their list Borup: Right now, but all section line roads are assumed as the population of traffic grows, then they will be increased. Ruddell: In the whole scheme of things it's aminor-it's more minor than Fairview, Cherry Lane, Eagle Road, Franklin, Overland. Borup: So you are saying that you would rather see this school sited on Eagle and Fairview? Ruddell: I think if you followed the Comprehensive Plan and just followed that in close proximity the I-84 interchange, it would be suitable. Borup: That was my other point, because I'm very interested in what you are saying about the Comprehensive Plan. Ruddell: That's 3.10 and it's on page 14. But then we go on to page-about 54, transportation goals, where you speak to generally-transportation goal is... De Weerd: It's a charter school, not a vocational school. Ruddell: It's the same thing. They've given it a year 2,000, 21St century term. This was written in 1990. Borup: That's semantics maybe, but the Comprehensive Plan does say it should be located on a minor arterial. Ruddell: No. Well it says, no, yeah or a minor arterial with I-84, okay, well Locust Grove doesn't-isn't a minor arterial with I-84. There is not going to be any interchange at Locust Grove up here. Borup: It wouldn't be a minor arterial if it had an interchange. Ruddell: 1t says industrial review area and an'interchange with I-84. MERIDIAN PLANN AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 ' PAGE 23 MacCoy: Let me stop you right here and tell you a couple of things. Dr. Haley mentioned the fact that they had worked with all the various entities and the highway department are both two divisions. One is the Idaho division of highways and one is the other for the State of Idaho. Some of us have been involved in the whole study, all right now wait a minute. There is a fot of changes that are already on the books right now on everyone of these, Linder, Locust Grove, Ten Mile, they are all going to be expanded, I-84 is going to be expanded again. We are just seeing the beginning of it down here in the Flying Wye which is coming right back into meridian because we are next in line over all Idaho cities right now, so we have been looking at this school site and other school sites that have already been picked and looked at and we've got a group of people that are all walks of society, come from businesses and everything else that are working on this thing with what I think is some of the best technology we've got in the community around here to pick out where this place should be so we don't make a mistake now, because we can't afford later on to come in and say we would like to buy it someplace else because the land in Meridian is going out of site, this in the last year. We're are in trouble already from that standpoint, but anyway, I just want to let you know that there has been a lot of people involved in making plans with hopefully all the smartest things we could put into this thing. Ruddell: But the transportation goal speaks to a balance and mixed transportation say environmental for both short and long-term. You know policies down through there. In 1.3U encourage development of balance of transportation in support of air quality and environmental concerns. Okay, that's what I'm saying is I believe you should look at this thing as a global nature, this site by itself if there were no other alternative for it, is one thing. When they have an alternative and I don't want to bring the middle school in it, but there is an alternative there. So it's not a one piece meal, I don't think it should be considered piece meal. When it gets piece mealed, you loose the cohesiveness of this Comprehensive Plan. We would go and consider needs of pedestrians, bicyclists in development we do process, designate Locust Grove from Ustick to Chinden as a connector. Community design, you talk about neighborhoods, I spoke about neighborhoods on elementary and intermediate school, but they should be located in the neighborhoods. I'll just leave that with you and the concern that when this Comprehensive Plan doesn't get followed and a good planning process is-if we end up with school district policies, I don't know if you...historical in the newspaper about a week ago. The school district has a policy that children must be off the campus in 15 minutes or 30 minutes after school. That's fine as long as that school is located in a neighborhood, where that kid, child, student can walk home. When we talk about this transportation plan, when you (Inaudible) sites, the child can walk home. The middle school child can walk home, from the Cloverdale site, the middle school child can not walk home. Which you force the parent to drive down there... MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 24 De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I think we are getting a little off track here. MacCoy: I agree with you. Ruddell: I'm just saying on the Comprehensive Plan, if you look at it in totality, with transportation and all that, what poor planning with not complying with it in the transportation, the community needs and better siting of these schools. You know we end up with these other secondary problems that cause concerns to the parents of the students that attend those schools. MacCoy: Let me stop you right there, where the Comprehensive Plan for 1993 was put together without a lot of thought process in the future, starting this year we are redoing our Comprehensive Plan for our city. Eagle has just completed theirs, Boise is doing theirs, Kuna is just going~to`finish pretty soon this spring. We are all working together and a lot of these things are coming together and we've had a lot of meetings and we've got a lot more to go with the very same thoughts that you have just mentioned here. So we are not doing it blindly, I would like to have you understand that. Ruddell: Okay, but when you consider this, when you consider the fact that you are putting a whole school district school in a residential neighborhood, if they flip flopped them as that little chart shows it, those numbers are provided by the school district. De Weerd: That is something to bring up to the school board. Ruddell: As you said there is no place to stop it, because once you approve this and. as your city code,. l think that's true, all they need to do is go to the building department and get a building permit, it's history and it's done. De Weerd: No they don't. MacCoy: Okay let me stop you, your time is up, thank you for your comments and we will move on here. Anybody else who would like to speak now? LAURA LONG,' 2345 STAR LANE, MERIDIAN, ID. Long: I would like to oppose, and I would like to go on record, the reason why we oppose this is because basically we moved into the subdivision to have a rural quality of life, and currently as it's zoned, we get a rural quality of life. We paid extra for that part. Directly behind our house runs the drainage ditches and that sort of thing, there is habitat that lives back there, there is all kinds of wild life, there is fox, there is goose, there is duck, skunk, everything that you could imagine that is back there and all of that stuff is going to get trashed whenever these people start building these buildings. I'm like him, I would like to see the MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND°ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 25 whole thing before they do anything. if you wanted a compromise, why not just zone the little four acre parcel. I don't see zoning the 40.55, I don't see zoning the whole thing, if they are only going to use four acres of it, then only zone four acres of it. That's all I've got to say. TIM BLOOD, 6054 EAST SUMMERIDGE DRIVE. Blood: I'm going to have to oppose annexation of any of it unless you can help me understand what I can do to protect my neighbors and myself and my property values, the safety of my neighbors and myself. We talked about some conditions attached to the annexation, am I hearing this right? How can we- again the concerns are obvious, I don't want to waste your time going back over territory that is obvious. We want to see the plan, I want to know why this gentleman is talking about the far southwest corner. Hey, that's right behind my house, how did they arrive at that? What can we do to bring this plan into the public form? I'm alarmed when 1 hear we would- like to hurry this through just as fast as we can. I'm all for education, but I'm also a member of the public and some of this stuff is coming at me from left field. I want to see the plan, I want to know the how and the why they are going to use this 40 acres. I oppose annexation at all, unless you can assure me that we are going to get some public input along the line somewhere. How is that going to happen? Help me. MacCoy: I will give you your answer in a moment here. Hold that for a minute, anything else? Borup: I've got a question Mr. Chairman. (Inaudible) get information and fact finding, apparently you oppose to having a school site next to the subdivision, is that what I'm hearing? Blood: I'm opposed to the school site as it's been described this evening. I'm opposed to anything just popping up like a mushroom (Inaudible) before hand. Borup: Well, would you rather see some other, something else developed there than a school site? Another subdivision? Blood: As opposed to a high school, a large campus, personal opinion, I would rather see the middle school there. That's what I would rather see there. I didn't think we would discuss those things, so I've been avoiding those particular subjects. De Weerd: And 1 don't think it's an option either. (Inaudible) MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 26 Borup: I don't know if it's anything that we can control, I'm just trying to get a feel for what-there seems to be opposition to a school in the neighborhood, I'm not sure where a school should be. Blood: ...I may not even be opposed to this one. What I'm opposed to is being blindsided by a building popping up on the southwest corner by not knowing the full scope of what is going to go on there, by not being able to have any input before it happens, by wanting to rush it in. That's what I'm opposed to, that's what I want you folks to help protect me against. I'm assuming that's why you are here. MacCoy: That's right, yes. Blood: Well then, lets slow this process down to the point where the public and the subdivision can have a look at what the school district has planned, that's what I would like to see. MacCoy: Dr. Haley would you come back up please? You've heard the statements of the people here, is there anyway that in planning, I don't know why this has been such a hidden piece because it's been around (Inaudible) for some time, but is there anyway that we could actually have this on display someplace where people can come see it or we could put it someplace which would be if it's in the (Inaudible)? Do you have any suggestions? Haley: Mr. Chairman, commissioners, Mr. Thowless has this pretty well drawn up, I believe they are colored renderings of the building, there is a site plan, all of that could be on display, made public at any time, I guess I'm a little bothered by the comment that these things just suddenly occur, because that becomes a communication problem. We have sites all over the valley that we have plans for, but to reveal those until we get to this stage is almost impossible. MacCoy: I understand that, this one here, we are now to a point to where it could be in an evening meeting, displayed and explained and then go through that so if you could schedule something like that from the school district, because you are out of our territory right now by doing... (Inaudible) direct you to do this, we are saying we hear the message here and I think communication, you are right, seems to be the key issue here with what the school district is doing. Haley: Mr. Chairman, certainly a public hearing could be held, or public viewing whatever you want to call it could be held right away on this if people wanted to come in and see not only the plan for the four acres, but the long term intent that could be shared very soon. MacCoy: Thank you sir. MERIDIAN PLANNI~ AND ZONING k+1 FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 27 Borup: Mr. Chairman, question for Mr. Haley. Are there any drawings here tonight showing-okay, so we do have something here tonight that we could see. I realize this is something that we said we wouldn't talk about, but it seems to be a lot of questions that may answer a few questions and minds on this site over, I'm assuming that they are talking about the Crossroad site= Is that the other- looking at some stuff that was submitted here earlier, the middle school site- maybe just expand on why this particular site. You already-mentioned that it is centrally located throughout the Meridian School District, that is probably your number one reason for this location because of the central location. Haley: Mr. Chairman and Commissioner Borup, yes this site as I mentioned before was very carefully chosen so there wouldn't be a hardship on any particular high school to get to this site. If we move it to the site that has been mentioned as the site for the next middle school, which is on Pine Street extended, then you begin to create a distance problem from Eagle High School and students are going to be driving further, where if we put it in the center, we will have pickup points with bus transportation, bringing students into the site. It was carefully selected, we could've gone any number of directions to do this, but the middle school site was also.carefully selected as well and some of you remember us taking over two years of negotiations to get that site so we could relieve student populations at Lake Hazel, Lowell Scott... Borup: The middle school which would be right off Eagle Road, that would all be busing, there wouldn't. be any student driving at that location would there? Haley: That's a middle school .and very few of those students... , Borup: So we don't have to-worry about students on that busy road. Haley: Very minimal. MacCoy: Is it something that you could deal with... Unidentified: I just have to ask you guys, are we beyond the point of making any changes at all on your site plan at this point? Are you guys... Unidentified: Is it a done deal? Unidentified: Yeah, a public meeting is going to be a mute point, if you already know what you are going to do regardless. Is that where we are at with that? Haley: Mr. Chairman and commissioners I think the real question here is why did we pick the four acres in the corner? MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 28 Blood: That's my reafquestion, I believe there are other people here that have others. Haley: The reason for that is because that is the point closest to where sewer and water would be. It is also right in the corner where the new driveway would go up along the side. So it seemed logical to place it at that particular point in terms of saving tax payer dollars. In terms of moving it to another corner, the center or whatever, the increase of cost and we felt like at this point in time we wanted to keep the cost to a minimum. MacCoy: Thank you. Anybody else who wants to speak at this time? Borup: Mr. Chairman, I'm wondering if it would save some future questions if we had a short presentation on~the plans (Inaudible) or maybe see some response from the audience after Mr. Steinbach. JOE STEINBACH, 2065 PARADISE LANE. Steinbach: You know, I've never attended one of these things, I forget even your title. MacCoy: Commissioner. Steinbach: I came up here and I knew there was some sort of proposal and I attended this meeting because I received this letter in the mail, like most my peers as well. I ask the question and it was so stated that there is no proposal- going backwards for a moment please and I hate to regress this was just to annex something into the city without a plan.. Holly cow, what are you people representing to us? This is annexed and bang, he's got a plan, he's got a plan and this is already a cut and dry deal. MacCoy: Did you hear us say that it has to come back before us before-they can't put in a Jack In The Box out there, that's not allowed. Steinbach: Maybe I appreciate that, maybe I would rather have a Jack In The Box out there than a school. MacCoy: Well, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but go ahead. Steinbach: At this point in time, I'm not against quality education. If we were only talking about annexation, I believe that's what this here says for a proposed school. Goodness gracious, I mean 4 acres for a school, that's ludicrous. That's a waste of good tax payers money. So there has got to be more to this. One other thing is a fact sir, that path that you call that little road that he got in there, that was $58,000 worth of road construction. I'm sure there is a purpose MERIDIAN PLANN~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 29 behind that. Maybe to support these buses for this school and these proposals. Long range, how is this going to impact me as a tax payer to the Meridian Schoo{ Bonds that are going to come before again that I get to pay more on. The rest of these folks here, have you considered that, I address the issue as the sewers. We don't even have enough in the Meridian sewer to come that direction. The roads are not adequate for that. Look at the other areas of development in this community that are exactly in this same situation. Please first consider those issues. MacCoy: We do that. Steinbach: As a road source you talk about safety and conservation, you talk about animals. We the people here of this community would like to be heard first instead of somebody railroading something through, because all I'm interested in is annexing this at this time. Then would it do to effect and I know that my time is running out, my property values. What is going to happen to my property values? As Mr. Davis so stated, what is going to happen when these contractors--you can go out to any given area and see these messes. Sir, you wake up with a plan everyday, and a plan for this meeting as most of the business people in the working force that goes forward everyday. Until we see a better plan, I am opposed. Thank you very much. MacCoy: Back to Commissioner Borup now. Borup: My question was I wonder if that would answer (Inaudible). MacCoy: What I'm afraid of happening is getting into a great big discussion about placement and size and material and how it looks and so on. Borup: l don't know-right now no one has any information at all. We are just speculating. People are opposed to something that they haven't seen. MacCoy: Okay, let me do it this way. Would the applicant come forward please? You say you have brought tonight (Inaudible) elevation pictures and so on. Thowless: That is correct. MacCoy: Okay we will make a little deviation here, we will let you share those and I'm not looking for a lot of comment from the audience. You can see it for the first time, if this is the first time you have come across this and at least you get that first cut at it. I would suggest to the school district that in the immediate future that you plan a public meeting of some type where the people., the neighborhoods could come in and actually ask questions and go through a lot of detail work with you, because I think they have a right to do that. So could you MERIDIAN PLANNI~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 30 give us a quick thumb nail sketch. of this so they have something to go home with. (Inaudible) Thowless: This is the property, north is up, Heritage Subdivision is north of the property, the other subdivision is south. The buildings that you see on here is the ultimate long range plan that Dr. Haley addressed a short time ago. The shaded building in the southwest corner is the initial building that's proposed. Again it's 1,600 square feet to give you some idea of comparison of size, most of the elementary schools in the Meridian School District are between 55,000-60,000 square feet. This initial building would be 1,600 square feet. It will be single story, not double story. The middle schools in the Meridian School District are two story structures. The initial driveway would be toward the north end of the building. Parking primarily would be on the west between the school building and Locust Grove, some parking would be on the south side. The building is setback approximately 150 feet from the south property line. Along the south property line is that private road, proposed by Mr. Hollister to access his property. Consequently from the north fence line of the. (inaudible) Subdivision to the closest point of the proposed building is actually about 200 feet away. The building setback is about 250 feet from Locust Grove. In terms of siting, just that 3.5 to 4 acres is proposed to be developed at the present time. Ultimately there would be a loop road around the campus as future buildings are developed to spread out the parking so that a large parking lot would not be located in any one part of the site. .(Inaudible) Rossman: Just a minute Mr. Blood you are going to have to step up to the microphone if you are going to testify. I don't know if the commission (Inaudible) MacCoy: He is making a presentation that's it right now. Thowless: The building itseif consists of ten classrooms, amulti-purpose room, which could be subdivided into two additional classrooms and administrative offices. There is a great deal of glass and windows in the building and other than that it's quite a simple structure. Again in this building the maximum student capacity would be 200 students. Borup: This is a single story building? Thowless: Single story building. The exterior of the building would be brick, clay brick, not concrete brick stucco and glass. Permanent structure. MERIDIAN PLANNI~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 31 Rossman: Mr. Blood please do not comment during this proceeding without testifying upon invitation by the chairman, thank you. Thowless: I will mention that the height of the building is in part due to the parapet walls around the top which are there to screen from view the mechanical equipment on the roof. The building were lower, you would see the mechanical equipment on the roof, which most people find unattractive. I think in a nut shell that should give an idea of the proposed facility. MacCoy: All right, thank you very much. Commissioners what your (Inaudible) public hearing? I'm going to suggest is that there would be a lot of questions to do a lot of this and I would like to have you either wait till the school district has their meeting, so you can opt to do that. It's already 8:30 and we are just at number three on our list. You are going to force it so that most these people who are here for other things won't even get a chance to get their items up before us, before we close. I would ask that you either meet with them outside this room or go to the meeting that they will provide for you. You are talking about issues and this is not what we are here for. (Inaudible) MacCoy: Excuse me? Rossman: Sir. MacCoy: Commissioners? Nelson: Mr. Chairman it would appear that we are not going to resolve this tonight, I would also be inclined to agree with some of the audience who commented about dealing with this in a piece meal fashion. That does concern me, I think it should be a full meal deal or not. We should ask the rezoning with a plan altogether, I'm open to that. At this point, 1 think it would be appropriate to not close the public hearing, but table it-continue the public hearing... (END OF TAPE) Rossman: Are you proposing that we continue it to a date certain? Nelson: I would table it to our March meeting. Depending on what the other members would like to see happen. MacCoy: Any other discussion before a motion is made? Borup: Commissioner Nelson said he was concerned about piece meal, could you expand on that, I'm not sure what part you are (Inaudible) there. (^ ~'~ MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING ~~ FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 32 Nelson: If we approve this rezone to R-4, we are really not approving that campus, yet that first building would be able to bebuilt presumably with just staff review and the concern I think with a lot of people here is that over the evolution of this project that that plan may change. Of course it will come here for that, any additional buildings are going to come here, I understand that. I think it would be better if the community could respond to the whole campus concept now. Borup: I was more concerned about your comment that we are approving this piece meal. Nelson: Well, I think that even though we are only voting for a rezone, in effect we are starting the process without voting on=f think if we approve the rezone to R-4 the process begins regardless of whether any additional buildings come to us later down the- road. Borup: You are concerned that the buildings are going to be different than what is presented tonight, or... Nelson: I'm not concerned about that as much as I'm concerned that the people effected by this project aren't going to feel that they've been taken care of. lYthink it would be good public relations for this thing to go out in a more up front ` y manner. At least let them talk... APPLAUSE MacCoy: Any other discussion? Nelson: On that note, before I go .there=as a general rule, I would supportthe project anyway, comments that came up about property values and all those sorts of things, that comes up with almost every development that comes up. A lot of people seem to think people won't buy their house, when I bought my house, I tried to buy near schools, not further away. I disagree with that logic, but a lot of people still feel that way. +' `° Borup: The facts don't-the numbers don't (Inaudible) real estate professionals say the values are higher near schools. I'm agreeing with you. ~°~ MacCoy: You want to make a motion here? ~. Borup: I can make the motion, we can vote on it, I'm still wondering to continue it if there is any other pertinent public testimony? So far we are starting repeat, if there is something new anciYrelevant, I-would still like to hear it tonight. MERIDIAN PLANNI~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 33 Nelson: So would I, there is a few people who raised their hand, I would like to have them go on the public record so that if they don't want to come back to another meeting they don't have to. MacCoy: Commissioners that is what you want? You want to go that route? Borup: Hear some more testimony tonight,. I would. Again when I start hearing the same thing over... MacCoy: The point if anybody wants to make some comments, it has to be some new type of comment, because we've heard quite a bit this evening already. Anybody who would like to make a comment on the plus side right now for this? (Inaudible) Ruddell: I think that everybody here knows that the school district needs schools we would like to be involved in the process and I think they have made an offer tonight to meet with the people, I think they-it appears you are talking about continuing this for 30 days? I think they should offer and give us a date to meet with us between, within the next two week time period so everybody can go and meet. MacCoy: It appears that we are going to do that now anyway. Ruddell: Give us a date sir. MacCoy: Is there anybody else who would like to make a quick comment here before we... REBECCA YOUNG, 4053 N LOCUST GROVE, MERIDIAN, ID. Young: I would be directly right on that corner right across the street from them. Where my post office box are currently, we can't even get across the street right now to get our post office boxes because of the traffic there. I'm a little bit concerned about which road will be the access to north Locust Grove for that high school. Also I would like to know the months of operation, is it 12 months, or fall to spring? What are the hours of the school, are the students allowed to be there in the evenings, those kind of impact details such as water and sewer, we are all out there on septic and well right now. I have livestock, I have horses, I grow alfalfa out there, so I would like to know what does that do with the Settlers Irrigation and those kind of issues. MacCoy: Let me break this down into two pieces. I'm going to ask Bruce over here to talk about the water (Inaudible). The other questions you have about MERIDIAN PLANNI~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 34 getting across the street and so on, I would like to have you reserve that for when you talk to the school people about how they are going to go. Stay right where you are, Bruce? Freckleton: Chairman MacCoy, members of the commission, sewer and water is available and has been installed in Locust Grove Road to the north boundary of Summerfield Subdivision. As Dr. Haley had mentioned, one of the reasons for being in that south west corner is the availability to sewer. We are getting out on the fringes of our service area for the existing main lines and it is getting awfully shallow. Some of the facility planning that has been done, there is a portion of the property that will not sewer back toward Locust Grove to that corner, so that kind of facilitates the location on that corner. There is a new well that the city is going to be drilling, we have the property already, it is in the Summerfield Subdivision, that will help everybody in the area, not just school, but it will help water pressure for everybody. As far as irrigation goes, I'm sure they probably have water rights on the property. We would be looking for them to install a pressurized irrigation system to utilize their water rights. Young: How is that going to effect me when I draw off water from Settlers to irrigate my alfalfa and my horses? Freckleton: They have an allotment of water for the property per their water right. It has to work within their Settler's Guidelines. They would have to-they can't draw more than what they have allotted to the property in other words. Young: It just seems to me that that is a lot more detail that everybody should be-deserved the information on down the road and for us to hurry this up into October of this upcoming year seems to be very quick. Just when there is-I'm on the ten acres right back behind that. That Settlers Irrigation comes through there before it hits my property. So we need to know more detail about that kind of thing. and we are on septic and well, so I want to know how that all effects us. Okay, that was it. Borup: Just a quick question for Mr. Freckleton. Concerning the sewer, you said it was, it would service this first four acre site, is that going to need to be a new sewer line down Locust Grove to service any future development in there, most likely, or is that determined? Freckleton: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Borup, as I mentioned we are getting on the fringes of our service area. I've not seen any engineering on the sewer lines for this site. I'm not certain how far that sewer line can be extended before we run ouf of depth for the gravity sewer. As you guys know, we are opposed to doing any kind of pumping systems. The city has been looking at that northern service area for some future trunk line extensions. The facility plan does show MERIDIAN PLANNI~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 35 there is a portion of this property that would have to be in that future zone. I don't know if that answers your question. Borup: That could effect on any future development as far as delaying it or need to wait for sewer before the whole thing could be developed at least. MacCoy: For anybody. Borup: Right, thank you. MacCoy: Anything else want to be said before we... GLENN STEPHENSON, SUMMERRIDGE. Stephenson: I just had one quick question, do we have any chance to make a decision with any teeth in it about the projected drawing. We can meet with the school district and they say well that's not going to work for us, is there any time-it looks to me like that is setup with the parking lot, which is basically butt out to everybody, both subdivisions and the road and I'm not that far out of high school to know that a circular track around a high school is not that good of an idea. So I was wondering if there was some way we could possibly move this parking. lt's got a nice beautiful green way on the inside. Lets put the cars on the inside and the green stuff on the outside. That's my question, do we get any chance (Inaudible) mean anything. Borup: Are you saying that you would rather have the building closer to the subdivision rather than the parking? Stephenson: I would rather have the parking central in there and all the green way on the inside where the parking lot is. Borup: For the whole complex you're saying? Stephenson: Yeah the whole complex, lets plan it for the whole complex, because we all know it's going to go through, it's a three year plan. If we are going to have six buildings in five years, that's more than one a year. That's exactly what he said. MacCoy: Well, I think it's going to be longer than that, but anyway, the point is when you get to your meeting with the school district. Stephenson: Does that mean anything? When I meet with the school district, does it mean anything if-it's their final decision, I'm just Joe Blow off the street. MERIDIAN PLANNI~ AND ZONING • FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 36 MacCoy: You are a citizen of our city, suggestions to the architect, if you have a reason for saying what you do, they are not completely deaf. Stephenson: I know that, but we all know-we all see things in the way that we look at them for convenience or for cost, is there anybody who can supervise that process of the approval, other than them, because they do have the final word once we approve this, if I'm not-unless I'm mistaken. MacCoy: Okay, the school district has of course got a lot of work on this thing,, but your architect is there to listen to you as a people with good ideas. Stephenson: I don't need a counselor, I need someone not just to listen to me, need someone that is going to-you guys have the authority to make final decisions. Once it's in the school boards hands, they have the decision. They can hear me, they may make a few changes, but if it's going to cause a major havoc in a fall 99 opening, it's not going to happen, I know it. I wouldn't do it probably if I was them. MacCoy: They've got to go (inaudible) anyway. Let me say one more thing to you before you sit down. I've stood in that mans position before because that's my job. I've gone through what he has done here, having to meet with the whole community, public and listen to their ideas and as the architect, I did some changing, because some ideas came through and said well that works better and we can do that it comes out fora (Inaudible) we do the same thing for shopping centers, we do the same thing for a lot of places. He is not deaf. You have to have some give and take. He's going to listen and see if it will work out. He's going to be interested in just trying to figure out how you are going to live with what he is putting out there. Stephenson: So if it is approved though tonight, there is no other chance for review, is that correct? Or is that not correct? MacCoy: That has nothing to do with that. We are not talking about the building, we are not talking about the size. Stephenson: There will be no hearing for the building? MacCoy: We've got to go through other parts of this thing. We are talking about, like 1 said at the very beginning this is annexation and zoning, period. Nothing to do with the structures on the site. Stephenson: So there will be another meeting... MacCoy: Yes, there will be other meetings down the road coming through here. All right, commissioner Nelson do you want to make a motion here? MERIDIAN PLANt~ AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 37 De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I have a question for Shari. We have Planning and Zoning we no longer have Findings of Facts, so we do not add another month to the process, we've taken that away. Will there be another public hearing at City Council? Stiles: Yes. MacCoy: Might look at doing what Commissioner Nelson had proposed here and that gives us another crack at it anyway, and the public will have a meeting before that next meeting anyway. De Weerd: If the school district is willing to have a special meeting with the residents, I would be willing to have special meeting just on this particular item. MacCoy: I think we ought to work this out with the school district, we just can't make the decision right here tonight. De Weerd: I don't mean with theirs, I mean in regards to our own business, after they have had a chance to meet. MacCoy: You've got in your hands right now, do you want to cut it now? Do you want to move it on? Do you want to-I've got to wait for you to come up with some type of motion as to how you want to see this. De Weerd: I would like the school district to have an opportunity to comment before we would close the public hearing, or continue it. Borup: I agree with that. MacCoy: Is that a motion in the first place? De Weerd: No, it's a statement. MacCoy: It's up to you to call them up here if you want. Borup: Yes, I'll second her motion if you want it to be a motion. MacCoy: I'm looking for a motion as to what you want to do so we can get this thing moving on. De Weerd: I don't want to close the public hearing yet, I would like to see if the school district would like to respond before we determine any further action. MacCoy: All right so you want a continuation... MERIDIAN PLAN AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 38 De Weerd: No, I would just like to invite them forward. Nelson: Mr. Chairman I think what she is asking is can we get the school district to confirm to the public that they will meet with them at a date forward so we can determine. CHRISTINE DONNELL, 454 E TOBAGAL, MERIDIAN, ID. Donnell: I'm superintendent of the school district and we would be happy to have this meeting and believe that we could have that next Monday evening. We just finished a board meeting last night, so next Monday evening should be available to us and we will schedule that and make sure we get information out to all interested parties. I would like to make just one comment though. It is important to us to open this school as you well know and all of these people know, the growth in the district has been astronomical over the last few years. This charter school gives us an opportunity to relieve growth in our existing high schools, even though it's only by 150 to 200 students. It's an opportunity for us, based on the facf`that we have charter legislation that allows us to do different things with our kids and provide choices for these students and these parents. Some of those people are here this evening in support of this wonderful choice. My concern and I'm sure these neighbors wouldn't share that particularly, since they feel like they have not had privy to any of this information, but it has been out and there has been an awful lot of information generated in the papers about this project. We've already been having information meetings about this project. Those have currently been held the last couple of weeks. My urge to you as commissioners of planning and zoning is to annex this property so that we can go ahead, so that we may open this school in thefall of 99. That is the concern that we have at.the school district. We certainly don't want to do anything that would cause us to not be good neighbors. We believe this is going to be a beautiful facility. We think this will be an opportunity for those neighbors and I think they will be very proud of it. So we will certainly extend this meeting time next Monday evening. (Inaudible) is it a holiday? It isn't a holiday for me. Monday night is still really a good night for us. I would encourage everybody to come, we will have it at 7:00 and we will plan to have that... MacCoy: Where is your location? Donnell: Currently at Meridian Middle School, we will have it there in the auditorium, probably is the most central location. MacCoy: All right, I'm going back to the commissioners now, what do you want to do? f MERIDIAN PLAN AND ZONING FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 39 Nelson: Is there a way to table this to a date certain March 9, but keep it open to a special meeting? De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, i think it would be appropriate right now to recess for a `short time, take a look at calendars and see what we want to do. MacCoy: Because the hours are late, it's 9:00, we ought to break anyway, it gives us a chance to look at our calendars and see if we can,get a special meeting planned before our meeting up next month, which is not good timing for trying to bring this into that point of view. So we will be back in ten minutes. (BREAK) MacCoy: First thing on my agenda is the fact that we are item three right now and it's 9:15, how do we do with this thing? We have decided in the back room here that we are going to stay on as long as we can get this thing finished tonight .because we are backed up. We've already got a plan for you on the next motion here in the few moments. Our March agenda is already filled and we are working on April already, we don't have any other slop time if you want to call it that. De Weerd: May I move that we continue the public hearing until a special meeting held on February 24, at 6:30? MacCoy: I was just going to give it to Commissioner Nelson. Go ahead, say it. De Weerd: I just did. MacCoy: Say it again so everybody hears. it. De Weerd: I move that we cohtinue the public hearing to February 24, at 6:30 to address this annexation. MacCoy: That's all we are going to talk about that night at that meeting? Borup: At this point. MacCoy: You've got a second? Nelson: Second. MacCoy: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. ,, r c • ,. ,. ... .. • .,. ,x e ,, .... a,„ ~ ~...,.,.. ~.~._ ,... ,-~+,... .ter BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION In The Matter of The Request ) Case No. AZ-98-105 FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING~:OF 40:55 ACRES-b ~`.~.: > 4 ~' '• ` ~ , ~ ' ~~, 3 ~' ~~~~' y'4 ) ' RECOMMENDA.TIOly TO CITY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT ) ~ aCOUNCIL N0.2 do the EAST SIDE OF ~'" ~ '~` ) ° ~ ~ `'' ~ `~~ ~ ~ ' ~' LOCUST GROVE NORTH OF SUMMERFIEL;D' SUBDIVISION` ~ ~' )` ~'~ t ~~. ~~ ) .. ~. kz INTRODUCTION ~~c~~~ APR 0 1 1999 City of 1Vleridia~ City CIerk Office c 3 ~ 9e_" ~ °` F - x 1 ~,.. 1. The property is approximately 40.55 acres_ in size. The;property ist, ~° ~ `sy e.L RF ~ ~ 1? located on the east side of Locust Grove Road, between Usticlc and McMillan Road just north of the Summerfield Subdivision. ~."= E , ~,. w ~ r 2~ The owner of record of the subject~property is Meridian Joint School ~ ~, District No.2, of 9I 1 Meridian St., Meridian, Idaho. 3. Applicant is the owner of record. ~. ... .. ~ y.. i ~ _ g R 4. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as Rural Transition ,.'~~A F . ~ ,, (RT}, and is vacant. ,, s 5. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as Low Density a~ f~ ~, Residential (R-4}. 6. The proposed site of the subject property is located north of the Summerfield Subdivision, south of the Heritage Subdivision and is surrounded by . ,,,., - RECOMMENDATIQN TO CITY COUNCIL - ``-I ANNEXATION AND ZONING -MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 . .. ,~ !4 ~ ~~ r . ~ ~~_F .i,z ~, K '( r .~ m F. MERIDIAN PLANK AND ZONING .FEBRUARY 9, 1999 PAGE 40 Borup: Mr. Chairman for clarification for the members of the audience that's at the middle school on McMillan, not different middle school? Donnell: Meridian Middle School, Cherry Lane at 7:00, we will have an arrow going to wherever place they give us in... ITEM N0.4: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ADRIVE-THRU KIOSK IN THE PARKING LOT OF INTERMOUNTAIN OUTDOOR SPORT BY BRUCE A. BENOIT D/B/A BARISTAS ESPRESSO -1375 E. FAIRVIEW: Stiles: Chairman MacCoy, commissioners, this is for an espresso kiosk located at the Intermountain Outdoor Sports building. The site plan does not indicate all the uses that are currently on the site as you may be aware. There is an emissions van that is located on, near the easterly entrance to the facility. As this is all one parcel of ground, I would like to make as a condition of any approval and that this condition be tied to both the emissions van and the espresso kiosk that the prohibited signs that are currently on the site be removed before any certificate of compliance is issued ancf' prior to any occupancy of the facility. Borup: Mr. Chairman, just a clarification on that, are you saying that the emission signs need to be removed before-you are suggesting that the 4 emission signs be removed before this project is approved? Stiles: Yes. Borup: Does the owner of the property I assume have the ability to do that? Stiles: I would hope so. Borup: Me too: MacCoy: I would think they do. Bruce do you have anything? Freckleton: Chairman MacCoy, members of the commission, there was just one item that I wanted to touch on, that was item no. 1 in our comments. In the application, it is stated that the unit would be self-contained. There will be no hookups to sewer and water. They have, I believe a 50 gallon reservoir for fresh water, and a 50 gallon reservoir for gray water. I had just requested in my comments that we would like to get some information as to how they propose bringing that fresh water in and taking that wastewater away. Also, it was really hard to read the reduced copies of the plumbing, our plumbing official requested that they have a larger scale schematic of the plumbing. He's just concerned with the backflow protection. That was all I wanted... .. 1. ~a .. ~,.°" undeveloped land to the east and west. Centennial High School is located approximately two (2) miles to the east of the subject site. 7. The subject property is bordered to the north by the city limits of the City of Meridian. ~ 8. The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area r ~` ~. ~ ~. °* , t ~ . ~ ,. ,. of Impact of the City of Meridian: + , # §~ t °~ ~... +> 9. The°entire parcel of.the property is included within,the Meridian Urban *~,. ~.~ Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined iri the Meridian ,~ _ Comprehensive Plan. .. ~ -~ - 10. The Applicant proposes., to develop the subject property in the. following ~. ° manner: Construct and utilize a charter high school . ~-° E ., 1 L The Applicant's requestedzoning of the subject real property as Low Density Residential. (R-4)°is consistent with the-Meridian ComprehensivePlan~,~ Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject"property as`,Single ~Family- Residential. ~ ~ m ,.. 12. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. ° . RECOMMENDATION 1. The Meridian Planning and Zoning. Commission hereby recommends to .. ~; the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the requested annexation RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING -MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 ~.'~ u .r 4 4 ~ +~ I g •.° n. 1 a yp x ~~ ~~ + ~° >: and zoning as requested by the Applicant for the property described in the ,. application, subject to the following: - Adopt the'Assistant City Engineer Recommendations as'follows:s L { 1.1 This application is for a parcel of land directly adjacent to the north boundary of the Hollister parcel that is also the subject of an°annexatiori ~_ ' request. This application is being filed separately from the application A. filed by James and. Karen Hollister, however, these two applications are for contiguous parcels. the legal description submitted with the application .for annexation appears to meet the. requirements of the City . af'Meridian, and State Tax Commission. 1.2 Sanitary sewer serviceability to this,. site is questionable since this parcel ~~ is on the fringe of the service area.of existing mains. Applicant's ~ ~~ ~ engineer°shall verify the feasibility of service. 1.3 Water service.to this .parcel could be extended from the existing main ~` located in Locust Grove -Road. ' ' k _ 1.4 Any existing irrigation drainage ditches crossing or adjacent to the property shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. The ditches to ~, be piped shall be shown on the cite plans. Plans shall be approved .by f ~ the appropriate ixrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, ' with written .confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works-Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ' ditches crossing this project. ' .~ - 1.5 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project ~ ' shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be_used for4non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. Adopt}the City of Meridian Water Department Recommendation as follows 1.6 Well 18 needs to be on .line prior: to any more development in the ~S, subject pressure' zone. ~~~ . `RECOMMENDATION TO CITY'COUNCIL - 3 ANNEXATION AND ZONING -MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 a » 1. x } .. .T Y. M ~~ s C. r • „. .' ~.. k N. ~ ,r y Y ~` Adopt the Central District Health _Department recommendations as follows: a Y +( 1.7 Central sewer will need to be made mailable to the subject project. ~.. ~ - The Planning and Zoning Commission further advises: ,. , {. _ r. 1.8 A 6-foot high permanent chain link fence be constructed intone of two methods: ~4~ e x ' 1.8a. Around the north and east boundaries of the Phase 1 proposed ~" ' development or that'a six foot permanent chain link fence be constructed on the east property line between the School District property and the Davis property; on the north property line bf the Hollister property between the School District property and the Hollister property, and on the east boundary of the School A . District property between the School District property and the 3 Hollister property.. a ~' ~ ~~ l.Sb. The School District be given the option to negotiate with Mr. ~ ~ Hollister that in lieu of placing the fence between the Hollister property and the School District Property that the School District extend it directly south on the east ,property line between the . -Hollister property and the Davis property. °~ 19 That the subject annexation and zoning be limited to school educational .~ use and specifically exclude residential subdivisions. .~ .~ Y ey/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Meridian Joint School Dist. No. 2~(AZ)\AZ4055.Rec ~ '" r 1 ~ y ` k r ~.. T, s Z f d y 7 ~_ #'. J r ~, ~ R ~ ' . RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 4 ANNEXATION. AND ZONING -MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 ~' z ; J _ ~~ aI t JUSTIN P. AYLSWORTH JULIE KLEIN PISCHER WM. F. GIGRAY, III D. SAMUEL JOHNSON WILLIAM A. MORROW CHRISTOPHER S. NYE PHILIP A. PETERSON STEPHEN L. PRUSS ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN R. STEPHEN RUTHERFORD TERRENCE R. WHITE r' ~' {~ • WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW ~t GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 NAMPA OFFICE POST OFFICE BOX 1150 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680.1150 POST OFFICE BOX 247 TEL (208) 288-2499 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 FAX (208) 288.2501 TEL (208) 466.9272 FAX (208) 466-4405 Email via Internet @ wfg@wppmg.colri PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE ~~E D APR 19 1999 ~°I~,~= c~~tl~el~idian ~I>~~ ~I~~k ~Uffice April 19, 1999 William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerlc MERIDIAN CITY HALL 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (40.55 ACRES) WITH GOVERNMENT ENTITY Dear Will: I'have attached hereto the Development Agreement for the above matter. As a standard quality control measure to insure that development agreements are properly authorized and signed, when the developer is a government entity, the City should receive from the developer, along with the signed agreement, a copy of the Board of Trustee's of the School District Resolution authorizing the signature. This should be kept with the file. If you have any questions please advise. Very truly yours, DICTATED BY ATTORNEY AND , SENT WITHOUT SIGNS+THE (N HIS ABSENCE TO AVOID ucLAY Wm. F. Gigray, III q msg\.Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Meridian Joint School Dist. No. 2 (AZ)\Clerk Itr on Dev Agmts40.55 Ac.wpd ._. J I t o • X ~ WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JUSTIN P. AYLSWORTH 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 NAMPA OFFICE JULIE KLEIN FISCHER POST OFFICE BOX 1150 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH WM. E Ci1GRA$ III MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 POST OFFICE BOX 247 D. SAMUEL ]OHNSON TEL (208) 288.2499 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL (208) 46b-9272 WILLIAM A. MORROW FAX (208) 288-2501 FAX (208) 466.4405 CxxtsroexER S. NYE Email via Internet @ wfg@wppmg.com PHILIP A. PETERSON PLEASE REPLY TO STEPHEN L. PRUSS .MERIDIAN OFFICE ERIC $. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN R. STEPHEN RUTHERFOAD TEARENCE R. WHITE ~ ~ ~ D W44 ~~// 191 999 APR April 19, 1999 City of Meridian City Clerk Office William G. Berg, Jr. Meridian City Hall 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE . I Please find enclosed the above ordinance for the annexation and zoning for the Meridian Joint School District No. 2. Please place this ordinance on the City Council agenda, and if this meets the Council's approval please have Mayor Corrie and yourself execute the ~. same. Dear Will• a Also, please note in Section 5 you will need to fill in the date when the Development Agreement has been executed. If you have any questions arise, please advise. `~'pA~~'9~V~F@~NEY AND SENT WITHCillT SIGI~r1TJRE IN H!S ABSENCE TO AVOID DcLAY Wm. F. Gigray, III msg/Z:\Worlc\M\Meridian 15360M\Meridian Joint School Dist. No. 2 (AZ)\Clerlc on 40.55 OrdLtr.wpd ** TX CONFIRMA~N REPORT *~ DATE TIME TO/FROM 14 04/19 16 08 1 208 336 3680 CITY OF MERIDIAN.. AS OF APR 19.16 14 PAGE.01 MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS EC--S 05'54" 017 144 OK Mayor HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ROBERT D, CORR11: A Good Place to Live ~~~-~.= C CITY OF MERIDIAN HARLESROUNTREE GLENN BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 RON ANDERSON Phonc (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 KL`I7H BIRD LECAL DEP,~RThIC;NT PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DE!'ARTMENT l3oe) s3~-211 PLANNING AND ZONING DEYART~tEN7 !_'OS) 83-F-5533 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET FAX NUMBER; ~3~ ' ?j[p~ DATE: TO: ~ ! ll'Y~~, p~ TITLE/DEPARTMENT: ~ j~ ~ CONFIDENTIAL: YES NO` D~_ TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): CITY OF MERIDIAN - FAX NUMBER: (208) 888-4218 „ n. TITLEII COMM PLEASE CALL US IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLY (208) 888-4433. ,,, 4 . • JUSTIN P. AYLSWORTH JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. E GIGRAY, III D. SAMUEL JOHNSON WILLIAM A. MORROW CHRISTOPHER S. NYE PHILIP A. PETERSON STEPHEN L. PRUSS ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN R. STEPHEN RUTHERFORD TERRENCE R. WHITE 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 POST OFFICE BOX 1150 ~ MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680.1150 TEL (208) 288-2499 FAX (208) 288.2501 Email via Internet @ wfg@wppmg.com April 19, 1999 William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerlc MERIDIAN CITY HALL 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Dear Will: WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW &GIGRAY, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL (208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 466.4405 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE ~~ev~p APR 191999 City of Meridian City Clerk Office MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 /ANNEXATION AND ZONING FINDINGS 40.55 ACRES _r - ~ .... a Please find enclosed- the original of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING prepared as per instructions from the Council meeting of April 6th, and which are on the agenda for April 20th. Please advise Council to take action upon the Hollister annexation and zoning for approval of their application first, as the Hollister property will need to be annexed first before proceeding with the Meridian School District's Findings, etc. After the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order Granting Application for Annexation and Zoning have been adopted, please submit the Development Agreement to the owners for signatures. If you have any questions please advise. vi~l'C~T~B`~~ORNEY AID SENT WITHGUT SiG~.°~'1TUF4E I,! msg\Z:\Worlc\M\Meridian 15360M\Meridian Joint School Dist. No. 2 (AZ)\FFCL DevAgtC11c40.55.1tr • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET{NG FEBRUARY 24 1999 I The special meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order 6:30 P.M. by Malcolm MacCoy. MEMBERS PRESENT: Malcolm MacCoy, Tammy De Weerd, Keith Borup, Mark Nelson, Byron Smith. OTHERS PRESENT: Shari Stiles, Bruce Freckleton, Eric Rossman, Will Berg, Bill Gordon, Bill Musser. MacCoy: We would like to start this Planning and Zoning meeting which is an extension of a meeting we had a few weeks ago on the subject of annexation and zoning for 40.55 acres here in Meridian for a school site, for School District No. 2, because of the crowd we had and the direction we were going, this commission called it to a halt, we tabled the topic. The school board held a meeting information wise, question and answer here Monday ago. It was well attended by 75-100 people and I thought a lot of things were said that should've been said earlier and hopefully we got the air cleared and what we are after. I want to remind everybody here that this is what we are after is annexation and zoning of the property which was bought by the educational section of our community here. We're not talking building, size, height, the color, the nomination, grass or anything else here. We are talking about the plot of land which is being requested to be annexed into our city which will allow them to get sewer and water attachment to their land and then we will go from there. At this point, I would like the staff-do you have any comments right now? Any additions or anything that you think should be said at this point? Stiles: I don't have any additional comments. MacCoy: With that, I want to continue the public hearing. I want to ask that the applicant come forward and make any statements that they want to make right before we continue on with the rest of the public hearing. Who is that going to be? CHRISTINE DONNELL, 454 E TOBOGAL COURT, MERIDIAN, ID. Donnell: I'm superintendent of the Meridian School District and as petitioner for this request of annexation, it is again a request that the property be annexed and zoned so that we may go forth and build a professional technical high school on this property. With that, I will just stand for any questions. MacCoy: Staff, commissioners, anybody? Any questions? PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETI~ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 2 Smith: I have a couple of questions Mr. Chairman. I was just skimming through the minutes which I read a couple of nights ago, I didn't run across what the other phases were going to incur as far as what areas we were going to focus on (Inaudible). Donnell: Commissioner Smith, Chairman MacCoy, the planning for further development of this will again, if you noticed-and we are looking at the site plans, are again additional buildings that will be like the one that we have planned so far. We have yet to determine what pathway, career pathway those might be. We will look and take information from industry and business as to what the next pathway would be that would provide our students with the greatest advantage when they complete our-the schooling from our district or go on to a secondary education. It could be along the field of health occupations, it could be travel and tourism, it could be even actually fine arts. That has not been determined at this point. Smith: Okay, so how did you arrive at-then how did you make the decision that you needed 40 acres and that you needed six buildings that build out and so forth if you are not really sure what... Donnell:. What it will be? Smith: What those demands or needs might~be for the community? Donnell: Commissioner Smith, we looked at and Bob Haley is here who has been involved in the planning and Iwill-you may ask him those questions too. Actually we realized that eventually we would- want a school that could house about 1,000 to 1,2000 students, eventually that could be 10-15 years. Smith: Is this a model of this type of facility then? Ideal size, maybe around the country? Donnell: It is. Smith: That was my other question, there was some conflicting testimony as far as the number of students in the minutes. It's 200 at the first phase? Donnell: That is the maximum number for the first phase. We will actually be looking at 156. Smith: Okay, I think that is all my questions. Donnell: Okay. MacCoy: Any other commissioner have anything to say, any questions? PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETI~ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 3 Donnell: Thank you. MacCoy: Is there anybody else you want to have up here to say anything? Okay, all right we are going to open it up to the public for those who are in favor of this annexation to come speak first. Remember that you have three minutes and. then we will move on to somebody else. Is there anybody here that would like to get up and speak in favor of this annexation? Yes sir, come up. SAM JOHNSON, 603 LOSLASARIOS, EAGLE, ID. Johnson: Mr. Chairman and members of the commission, I was a small business owner in the Meridian District for ten years and my children attend the Meridian School District. So I would like to speak in favor of this school being a product of a school that was founded nearly 100 years ago by the Wright Brothers in Dayton, Ohio brought along these same principals. Most people say (turned out okay, but having gone into engineering, I see a real need in the technologies and I would like to speak that this school would be a tremendous asset for the business community, not only as the mentors and trainers of these students, but also as the potential employers and also for the tax base that these highly skilled 'and technically trained and professional people would represent. The caliber of the students I think you would find to be fine examples of young people. I don't think there would be any problem with discipline or other types of issues, so with that, I would like to encourage you to support this program because I think it's a model that Meridian will be proud to have kind of the first in the state. Thank you. MacCoy: Before you leave the podium, is there any question from the commissioners? Okay, thank you very much. Is there anyone who would like to step forward on the pro side here? All right, then we will change over to the other side and those of you who are in opposition to the annexation of the school site, will entertain the fact and you can come forward and have three minutes at the podium. JAN SYLVESTER, 1775 E SUMMERHEIGHTS DRIVE, MERIDIAN, ID. Sylvester: I have a question regarding this hearing, is this hearing to annex a piece of land to build a high school or is this a hearing to annex a piece of land to build a Charter High School. MacCoy: It is an annex a piece of land for the educational department of our school district here that will put on that site. We are not looking as to what from our view point as what it will be, because they have the respons-we don't dictate to them what they put on that property. We have a chance to be involved in the discussions, but we are not here as a ruling body to tell them no you can not put an elementary school there or do anything like that. PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETI~ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 4 Sylvester: I spoke with the-Wally Hendricks at the informational meeting, he told me, the City of Meridian in order to build a high school, had to have a 50 acre site, this is 40 acres. MacCoy: All right. Sylvester: Why have they selected 10 acres less for their high school? MacCoy: We will .have to ask the question to the experts that are here. We don't have that information. We will have someone come forward in a few minutes to answer your question. Smith: Is you question whether or not that is a city ordinance that requires 50 acres for a high school, or whether that is school district policy. Sylvester: I believe that is school district policy. Smith: It is school district policy, it has nothing to do with this commission or the city. Sylvester: So the question would be to the school district, why there building a high school on less than 50 acres. MacCoy:. (Inaudible) ourselves. Anybody else have a question to put forth or a statement? REBECCA YOUNG, 4053 N LOCUST GROVE, MERIDIAN, ID. Young: I'm on the other side of the street where°the school would go in. Originally I stated that I was .opposed to it, it's not so much that I'm opposed to the school as what preparations are being done for us to live around the construction of the school. Some of my questions that I had written down were what kind of issues are going-I'm going to just read them off so I don't forget anything or repeat myself. With the recent construction of North Locust Grove, for example, we have a church to the right of us and a church meeting hall that has gone down the road to the left of us and new subdivisions. It is very evident that there has been significant increase in traffic with the addition.. of this school, the traffic issue will become even greater. This is not only due to the fact that buses and students will becoming and going, but because the school has stated that they plan to build one building for now and that additional buildings are projected over the next few years. This means that all residents will have to contend with continuous construction in the years to come. As the plan states their goal is for a total of six buildings in future years. Ultimately the residents will have large industrial-type traffic to contend with, in addition to the increase traffic from staff and students. Also, what is the impact to current septic and well customers as the new sewer and water companies push through. Are we going PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETI~ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 5 to be asked to change our current systems to conform? If so, is the cost of this project our responsibility? What if any impact statements have been done regarding interruption to Settlers Irrigation system? What are the proposed hours of operation for the school? Is this a 12 month schedule? Is it open into the evening hours for night classes? Will types of flood lighting or security lighting be used at night time? Will these lights glare into people's homes? Will there be any loud or disturbing types of sounds or noises that the residents will be exposed to? Why aren't the road improvements done? You guys might have already looked into this, but before a new proposal for construction is accepted. So far we have two new churches, new subdivisions and no new road improvements have begun. I think these are questions that deserve to be addressed, simply so that we will know how our living conditions will be. If they build one building for now and then in two years another one, then you are looking at 10-15 years of new construction going in, we have all seen the weight of the traffic from that. IF you spend a 5:00 evening at Ustick and Meridian Road, interfacing there where there is a four way stop sign, the traffic backs up now at 5:00. Is there going to be a light system put in. Those are the type of concerns that I have had. MacCoy: Very good questions all of them. Before you leave the podium, is there anything that the commissioners want to say, (Inaudible) put it over to staff in a moment here. Or you want to wait till after the staff talks. Bruce? You heard her questions, what about sewer, water, irrigation, all those things for this area? Do you want to make a statement on that? Freckleton: Chairman MacCoy, members of the commission, as we address those items in our comments, city ordinance does require that the ditches, historical flows are passed through the property, by city ordinance they have to be able to pass through the water. You have to be able to get you historical flows to your property. I assume it goes through this property to yours? Young: Before it gets to ours. Freckleton: That is something that would be addressed during the design review of their site plans and that sort of thing. As far as the sewer ability of the parcel goes. As I mentioned in my comments. That's getting out on the fringes of our service area. Some engineering is going to have to be done, they have located their building on the southwest corner of the parcel, where-that's the best location for it as far as getting into the sewer. The farther away you get from our mains, the harder it is to gravity into them. So that was a concern that I raised in my comments and that is something that is going to be addressed again during the design of the facility. Water, we have water right there at the end of Summerfield Subdivision, so it would just have to be extended up. The city does have a new well site in Summerfield Subdivision that we are proceeding with drilling a new well there. So we feel the supply will be there. Does that cover your questions? PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETI~ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 6 Young: It kind of answers the question, I guess. Except for--if everything goes through, what is going to be proposed to us to give us that information later down the road? Once this has the green light and it's in the go, then the impact that you are not sure of now, how would it be addressed or answered to us before it actually began, as we are the residents near that? Freckleton: Okay.... Young: Once you get the go on that, we are not going to probably have a say so anymore at that point I don't think. Or I don't know what the system is, but I'm kind of concerned about are we going to have a say so down the road if the choice comes up' and decisions are being made. MacCoy: Go ahead Shari. Stiles: If it is the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission for this annexation, they may place conditions on it, such as a site plan review. It may not be a public hearing, but it would be public before the planning and zoning commission. Anymore than one building on the property would require by our ordinance that a conditional use permit be approved, which you would be notified of, it would be a public hearing, both before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Young: So those things are addressed then? Stiles: Yeah. Young: Also, maybe you know more about what preparations have to be done on that road prior to constructions. MacCoy: Excuse me, I'll talk to that, because we have°had a numerous number of meetings of recent in the last months and we had a very heavy one last night here at this same place. We are looking at our priorities in our community as to what we have to have, what we need. That white board was full of various things last night, because of the school district and we haven't passed anything yet for annexation, but we know that the entire area is going to grow. We are addressing traffic lights, traffic signals, roadway expansion, time element as to when you have to get th8m done. One of our problems is that everybody has and knows for a fact that money is a big problem. We haven't got that much money in the total bank for Ada County, so we have to put our bid in sort of speak, which we are doing. We are making very heavy noise about the fact that we have not be handled correctly in the last four or five years with Ada County. What you saw was a result just recently is Franklin Road going in from 1St to Linder. That was due a couple of years ago and we finally stepped on the right toes and got that one done. We also .know that we have done a lot of things a lot smarter now and PLANNING & ZO~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 7 we went through that last night too about what we thought we could -get done in this year, 99 looking at our construction sites, our approvals and so on and we are going to be pushing very hard for a number of areas to get things done. In fact we were evening looking at staging last night, when we have to have say what Bruce had just mentioned here to do with our water and sewer piping, that has to go in ahead before they do the road work. There is a situation where we are faced with a (Inaudible) done the road work, you can't come back... Young: ...have to rip it up. MacCoy: For some years, five years before you can go ahead an cut it up again, or you pay a very heavy fine for it. So we are looking at dollars and sense. So we are trying to stage all of this. Our city engineer took note he was here last night and he will keep the highway department as to what our schedule is, how we see it because we are building out and everything, so we get ours ahead of them so we do one thing and then the next thing in steps. So we are trying to do it very smartly. Yes we are very concerned about our roadways, it's not just the one that you are speaking of; we have Linder, Locust, and it goes on and on because we see our community expanding in all different directions ahd we've got to have proper road size, proper signals, proper everything. We did get the approval and are in that position right now, maybe you've seen some of the work done here last fall, the summer and fall on the streets of Meridian and 1St for Pine street crossing. We got new lights put in, you may have wondered why the boxes that went on the side piece of the curb are so big. We're stepping into something this year which has been promised to us. We've been doing all the piping work, which has tore up our community for long here this past summer, we are going into an electronic situation so every light in this city will be controlled out of a single control house. So we can change things the police department has a handle on this. We can look at what the work load is, what the traffic load is, etc., etc. and we can control our lights. That's going to be not only what you see today, we've included all the new lights going in. We've already marked the spots on our map as what we want for the new lights. ACRD says they will do that for us this year. So you are going to see a lot of changes come into our community in this year 1999 and on going, because we've got the lead position right now on getting a lot of this road work done. We haven't forgotten this, we've planned way much in the future and are saying give us the help, ACRD and Idaho Transportation, because we need it. We have people, we have the largest expanding community in the state. We deserve the money coming in to do a lot of this work. They don't disagree with us. We have a continual running meetings now with a lot of very educated, very good expert people to see what we are doing and they agree with us. So you made some-very good points and we are looking at those very hard because we want to see the thing cleaned up also. We hear this all the time at this desk up here about our roads, our lights, and so on. So you've just echoed what we think also. ~So I thank you for thinking of the issues, bringing them forth, gives me a chance to say a few things about it. Okay, I'm going to ask the commissioners here, do they have anything else they PLANNING & ~ZO(~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 8 want to add to any of your questions? None, okay, thank you very much. Is there anyone else that would like to ask questions or figure out what they might want to do or are going to do? If not, I would like the applicant-I don't know who that is going to be-who will come forward to answer some of the... De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, there is another hand up. MacCoy: All right, come on up. Are you going to be pro or con? DAVE WINCOUP. Wincoup: I'm a volunteer trustee of the Meridian School District. It takes maybe courage to admit that sometimes. I just wanted to point out, I didn't testify the other night when I was here, I'm not doing this as the representative necessarily of the school district, although in my capacity I- guess I do that some extent. Mr. Chairman and commissioners, I just want to point out from the point of view of this trustee, I think this idea of a charter school for technology is an absolutely wonderfui idea that is desperately need for our community and it is desperately needed for this fall. The commissioners may be aware that our high schools are pushing 2,300 kids. We need to get any possible child we can into another opportunity. This would provide a wonderful opportunity. As you know, we are growing extremely rapidly. We had half of the growth in the entire state of new kids. We had 3,300 new kids in the last three years alone. So we have a responsibility as the trustees of this district to find a place for these kids and to provide the very best education that we can for these kids. As trustees, like you as volunteers, we put in a lot of time, but we take this responsibility very responsibility very seriously. This site has been owned. by the school district for many years and given that rapid growth, it would be absolutely unconscionable for the school district to not take advantage of this site. I want to point out a couple of things that this hearing is not. I've put out a few things that it is. It's not tonight about specific design of the building, the specific design of the site, that will come at a later time. This site is not going to remain vacant. There are those who would prefer and in my professional life I'm going to turn in, I do some land use work and I've had clients myself that boy, lets do what we can to close this project, because we hope that this site will remain vacant. This is a great site. It's filling in quickly, it's not going to remain vacant. There is going to be something there. A school site is probably one of the best potential uses for this area. These people would be able to use as my children would be the area of this for essentially a defacto (sic) park and fact, as you know the Meridian School District to some extent at least historically has been the defacto park system for this whole western end of the county. We've attempted to cooperate. Given the fact that something has got to go in there, a school might be far better than a McDonalds or a six story office building, or some use that would be far less compatible with this particular site. This is not about switching this site with the middle school site which is proposed. There are some who have talked to you about that and testified in that regard. This tonight is simply about annexation PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 . PAGE 9 and zoning for school purposes. Accordingly, this individual trustee volunteer would request your affirmative recommendation to be Meridian City Council and. with great appreciation. MacCoy: Is there any questions for him? Okay, thank you very much. Anyone here who would like to speak? Yes, come on up. LARRY LIPSCHULTZ, 3332 N SUMMERFIELD WAY, MERIDIAN, ID. Lipschultz: First I will tell you that my sense is that a lot of people think this is kind of a sour grapes thing, the people in Summerfield don't want the charter school, because they want the middle school. The people in Westdale want the charter school so that they can have the middle school. I think they are two very separate issues and I think there are real significant questions with both. In terms of the charter school, I have three issues that I'm kind of struggling with. I think two of them are~in your direct control. The first is the traffic issue. I'm concerned that I'm not seeing a firm commitment as to when Locust Grove and ", .: Ustick will be addressed by the highway department and my concern is that I don't think that the highway should follow the school, I think the school should . follow the highway. I think that at best, if the school is a success, we are going to have anywhere between 500 and 1,200-1,500 kids driving to school going to their intern .programs and I don't think that road is prepared for today. I think that with the chance of that happening in the next couple of years. I would like to see a firm commitment on what is going to happen with the roads before we approve a site to build any kind of a school there. The second concern is with-what happens if thisschool does not succeed. Do we have a building and what use is it for? I would like to see some kind of covenant where this building is designed such that it could be used as either an elementary or middle school or a traditional high school. I think to see a building there that the only other use would be either light industry or,office in that area, I don't think is right for that area. That's not what it's zoned today. While I understand that you have a lot of control and power in those situations, cross the street from our house is a half finished house that's been that way for four years and nobody. on the town council or your group has been able to do anything about it. So I know that the control of the city is not all encompassing, but if in fact that school didn't succeed, that it puts it as an empty building. So my second concern is in the design. My third issue which again, I think is more a school board issue than yours, just with the basic concept of investing three million dollars at this point and time. I assume with land and building, it's probably somewhere in that area. In fact, today we don't have enough books in our schools. All the kids don't have books, we don't have enough teachers, the resources aren't there. So it bothers me a little bit to invest that kind of money for 156 kids. Thank you. MacCoy: Before you leave the podium, is there any question (Inaudible)? PLANNING & ZOI~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999. PAGE 10 Smith: I have a question, roads should follow the schools, do you believe that the road should follow the subdivisions too? I'm sorry, schools should follow the roads, the subdivisions should follow the roads too? Lipshultz: Yeah I do. Smith: Do you live in Summerfield Subdivision? Lipshultz: Yeah I do. Smith: Okay, another example of the roads following the subdivisions. I think if you look at the design of this facility. Now I'm not familiar with exactly what all the programmatic requirements are, but it's a teaching facility. When I was employed with the University Architects office at Boise State University, the University acquired the ITT facility across Capitol Boulevard and converted it into teaching space, it was a natural transition. It's a teaching facility. It's not going to be something that-I just don't believe that this technical training is going to constitute something that can only be used by a light industrial type use. Lipshultz: Well my concern is that it is a 1,600 square foot stand alone building. I mean my preference would be to see a spoke and hub type of situation where you have a central area with one wing that goes off now that is used for this and then add wings as we go on which would be more conducive. Smith: We are not here to speak to design and aesthetics. Lipschultz: Okay. Smith: Even though I like to look at those things, that's not what we are... Lipschultz: The idea would be more aesthetics and more utilization, if in fact it didn't succeed. MacCoy: I think your question as you said earlier, is to the school board, not to us. We are interested as Commissioner Smith has talked about, we will be looking at how it's built and what the thing is. You have to remember that it's a campus situation. He is correct, it will not be used for light industrial, it will be used for education. I would like to go back one statement twenty years there, abut the roads, ahead of the development. That's a very good idea, except that we have our hands tied. The ACRD has got a rule of thumb, which they -live by, ever since I've been in this state. You've got to have 65% or better of the area that they are going to fix the road in populated either by homes or businesses before they'll step in and do any planning about what you are going to do with that road. So we are having, we are forced to be the other side of the fence, to be buildings and people first and the roads come second. Then they come back and they have the thing that say then they can then develop the road situation to PLANNING & ZOt~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 11 match the people. We have a lot of places here we would like to see the roads go in now because we know what is going to happen in the future, it's inevitable, but that -makes us no way at all, we have no voice in this situation. I've been in these meetings and time and time again, I might as well talk to that wall as to tell them how it's going to develop. They say it's not there now, they don't build it, they don't fund it, they don't do anything. So the best that we can do is keep tight as possible and keep them up front so that we are having them design things, even though they can't get them .built right away, because that takes time to design. That's lost time to us for getting the job done when we want it done. So if we can keep the heat on them, from this city that we need that, and we can show that we need that. We are talking about dates and so on, which we are, we hope the design gets done which is a good example, is Franklin round here, we did Franklin from here to Linder, 1St to Linder. We want as a number one item, from 1St to Locust Grove, because we have to deal in one mile increments because we have been pushing that is already on the drawing board and we want that as soon as possible. If we could get that by the end of this year, we would be very happy, because we have hit, we can prove we have hit the mark, beyond the mark as what the need will be. So it's just a matter of information to you for planning, yes we are heavily involved in this thing and we believe as you do. We would like to have it first roads and then development, but it's not in the ' cards for us. Okay? Any questions about that? Lipshultz: The only thing that I would say is that it seems to me that a charter high school of this type where most of the people will be driving and they will be coming from a wide area is less location sensitive than an elementary or middle school. So therefore, I have a little bit of a problem with creating an unsafe ~ condition for a traffic standpoint with out investigating all the alternative sites. From the fact that maybe there is 40 acres somewhere that wouldn't create that type of traffic hazard for the elementary school kids in the area. MacCoy: Well, I don't disagree with you, but I leave that up to the educational department because they are very sensitive about safety for the students. They look at not only where people presently live, where they are going to live, what we are going to have in the community, we do hear from them as to what, how, and what have you, but it's not our decision. So, yes we are with them, we work with them, they work with us, that's the best that I can tell you right now without- I can't give you a date for anything in other words. Lipshultz: Thank you for hearing me. Borup: I just have some information, there seems to be some concern on the zoning issue. I just want to point out that the request is for R-4 zoning. There are only two permitted uses in R-4 zone, one is single family residential, the other is public schools. That's it period. So office buildings or industrial buildings or anything else would not be a permitted use. PLANNING & ZOI~; COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 12 MacCoy: Thank you very much for that one. Anybody else want to get up here and say anything? Yes sir, come ahead. I figured that I would ask you to give a little background like you did the other night, which !thought was very interesting and good ground piece for what we have been .discussing .here. Go right ahead. BOB HALEY, 577 E LINKERSHAM, MERIDIAN, ID. Haley: Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, I thought maybe I would attempt to answer some of the questions that have been posed for you. There was a question about the schedule of the building again. Again, as we begin this program, our intent is for the class schedule the length of the year be approximately that of the traditional high school. Beginning roughly at 7:30 AM and going till 3:30 PM. Starting approximately one week before tabor day and ending approximately one week after memorial day weekend. I will say as was said once before, just with any of our schools, those schedules are subject to change, they could vary from year to year both in the length of the school day and in length of the school year. To stand here and tell you exactly what those changes might be would be impossible at this time. Question about lighting for the parking, there will be lighting on the outside of the building that is typical with most of our schools. There will be lighting in the parking lot that again is directed downward and shielded. We will make every effort so that this doesn't infringe on the community around the school. Question about noise, this school would probably have a tremendously less amount of noise than your traditional high school would because we don't plan to include an athletic program, we do not plan to have a band. We get comments from our schools when the bands are out there practicing at 6:30 in the morning or 10:00 at night. There won't be a band practicing out there. Nor will there be football games and stadiums and those kinds of things. Of course that has to do with the size of the facility, or the number of acres needed for a traditional high school 50 acres will accommodate all the athletic fields and so forth, that's not needed in this case. The question about 1,200 students coming and going, to take part in job sharing activities, even if this school were totally developed into the six pathways that we envision could occur over the next 10-15 years with 1,200 students. You would not have more than '/ of those students going out to work sites. Those would just be the seniors that are involved in this program who would be leaving at noon each day to go to work sites. They are going to leave sometime during the day anyhow, whether it's at noon, or at 3:30, the same number of kids would be leaving. As far as the use of the building, if this program should fail, there are all kinds of uses that this building could be used for in the district. Classroom space is always a premium. The building is designed so that we could add on to it if we needed to. Certainly as it is constructed, we could house 250 elementary students there easily and we could add another four classrooms if necessary. So I don't think there is any question as to what this facility would have plenty of use for the district should this program fail. I will tell you though that from the meetings that we've had around the district so far, there is tremendous amount of interest in this. I suspect we will have far more kids than we can handle and that PLANNING & ZO~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 13 we will probably use a lottery`system to select the original 156 students for it. Comment about the cost and so forth, every program that we go into has an investment. Certainly we would be making an investment into this program, but again, even if the program were to fail, it would be an investment that would still be a very good investment for the school district and for the students of this school district. Finally I know that some of you have had indication that this charter school does not meet the intent of the charter school legislation, because we wanted to make sure that it did before we moved forward with this petition. Trusty Wincoup and I met with representative Fred Towman who is the sponsor of the legislation for charter schools and he more than welcomed us to move forward with this idea. The best of the two worlds and the charter area is to have the community and the school district working together on a charter. I was told. over the weekend in a conference that !attended, that there are only three such cooperative ventures in the United States where the district is actually willing to work with the community to develop a charter school. So with that Mr. Chairman, 1 would be happy to try and answer any other questions we think that we have covered all the bases on this. MacCoy: Okay, thank you. Anything for the doctor? Nelson: I have a question, and I don't know if you are the appropriate one to answer this, but the issue has come up repeatedly about the construction, trash and also there has been a request for some chain link fence between this site and some existing homes. Could you answer to that request from the community? Haley: Mr. Chairman and Commissioner Nelson, yes we held a hearing on this a week ago Monday, I guess it was and that did come up. One of the things that we are committed to`taking a close look at would be a berm between the school and Summerfield Subdivision, which was not included in the original plans, along with additional landscaping. As with most of our school sites, we would look at chain link fencing, where it would be appropriate for control of students, trash and what have you. Certainly there are complaints about any school in any neighborhood about trash. Certainly we try to be good neighbors. We do involve students and custodians and.. so forth .in trying to keep that cleaned up. We like our schools to have an excellent appearance to the neighborhood, but we certainly can not guarantee that any time the wind blows it isn't going to blow a piece of paper`. Neither can this neighborhood guarantee to us that their trash won't be blown into the school site and collect against that chain link fence like it does in many of our neighborhoods. Did that answer your question? Nelson: That was a detailed answer. I don't have the letter with me, there was a couple that sent a letter requesting... De Weerd: The Hollisters.. PLANNING & ZO~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 14 Nelson: The Hollisters, did we specifically address them and their property? Haley: I'm not sure that we've seen that letter. We did purchase the property from the Hollisters, so this has been a cooperative... Nelson: Davis. De Weerd: The farmer. Nelson: I guess it would be the dairy farm next door. De Weerd: Tom Davis. Haley: Mr. Chairman, commissioner, I assume that his question was the same as he posed here at the last meeting about who would take care of the trash and so forth. Again, offer the same answer that I just gave that we would do our very best. MacCoy: Any other questions? De Weerd: Mr. Davis was the one that requested the nine foot chain link fence, I believe, but we do have a fence ordinance that limits that six foot. Would you be agreeable to help by fencing in that property line? Haley: Mr. Chairman, could I ask our architect, I believe that is already included in the plan, is it not? MacCoy: Do you want to come forward, we can't hear you. De Weerd: No, we just meant the property line that is shared with the Davis's... WAYNE THOWLESS, 1735 FEDERAL WAY, BOISE, ID. Thowless: As was mentioned in the last hearing, the portion of the site that is intended for initial development is about 3.5 acres in the extreme southwest corner. Mr. Davis owns the property east of the 40 acres. Given limited budget constraints, it would be our preference to not do work of any type beyond the boundaries of that initial 3.5 acres that needs to be developed for this first building. We're talking something on the order of 700-800 feet from this first phase building and that east property line, which the district is considering, continuing to lease for farming until additional portions of that property are needed for school development. So the plan at this point, was not to fence either the north property line, the east property line, or even the portion of the southeast property line that abuts Mr. Hollister's Property. Given there is no proposed change in use of that portion of the 40 acres in the foreseeable future. PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 15 , De Weerd: With Mr. Hollister with the access road that he has requested, is that on your piece of property, or his? Thowless; That is his property. He owns... De Weerd: Where would you be doing the additional berming and landscaping? Thowless: Could t show the site plan? De Weerd: Yes please. Thowless: North is up on this drawing. This particular drawing shows just 3:5, approximately 3.5 acres at the southwest corner of the site. The building,. is there, you can see parking on the west between the building and Locust Grove, as well as parking on the south side of the building. Mr. Hollister's 40 foot property that he intends to build a new driveway to his property is here on the south property line. We-there is already berming on the site, along Locust Grove, as well as further north, that will remain. The berming here in this first phase development will be re-contoured somewhat, it will be landscaped with grass and trees in response to neighbors concerns. We are going to be looking at some low berming along the south property line, between the proposed parking lot and Mr. Hollisters driveway. But we would like to at least at this time, stop that landscape treatment, trees, grass, berms, fencing, if desired, etc. at the eastern limits of this first phase of development which is about 30 feet behind the proposed structure, roughly at that location. If I may show you the other site plan of the entire site, the shaded building... (END OF TAPE) Thowless: ...phase building, that corner of the site you can see-get some perspective of the percentage of the site which will be developed initially. Mr. Davis's property is back here, the Hollister's Property is in the southeast corner. So you can see it's a long, long way between phase one of this professional technical school and Mr. Davis's property line. It would be a significant investment to fence the entire property at this time, but as Dr. Haley mentioned we do want to be good neighbors and if it comes down to that, we will try and find a way to deal with that concern, in the most efficient way possible. Nelson: I have a question, while you have that site plan. Is there any plans to do anything with that-are you just going to grass the difference between the parking lot and buildings and the Davis property, after this is all complete? You will end up with that open area right there on the right. When this is all said and done, is that just going to be grassy area; or what is the plan? Thowless: All said and done meaning built out the buildings as conceived at this point, how will that likely be used? I would expect that at that time there wouldn't PLANNING & ZOI~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 16 be enough residual property to warrant continuing to farm. As with as many as 1,000-1,200 students potentially on the site, even though athletic programs won't be offered per say, there will probably be demand, or need for some- fields for student activity. That decision has not been made yet and wi11 be up to the board governing the charter school as it develops over time. There has also been interest expressed by the City of Meridian in terms of possible joint use of that property for a community park. I'm sure those discussions will be ongoing. Nelson: Thank you. MacCoy: Any other questions for him? Smith: Wayne, the other site plan, the phase I, you talked about additional berming on the south property line. Is that-will that encroach into that loop road, I'm assuming that's a loop road on the south side, between the parking lot and Mr. Hollister's Driveway. Thowless: The portion of the loop road that would be developed at this time, it is anticipated would end at that point. Ultimately, there will be two landscape strips along that loop driveway, one between the driveway and the parking, and another one between the loop driveway and the south property line of the site. So what we would probably be looking at would be two low, modestly slopped berms, one on either side of that loop road, both of which would have grass and trees on them. The planting strip that we have shown adjacent to the parking lot is approximately, 10-11 feet in width and between the proposed extension of the loop driveway and the property line, is approximately 17 feet in width. You can't get a real high berm in that space, but we can do we believe attractive landscape treatment and at least do some shielding of cars and vehicular traffic, at least to a height of three feet, possibly four feet. Nelson: While you are up there. Take a look back at the full site plan, I think that by the end of this project, you are going to end up with a chain link fence anyway along the Davis Property, just that far-not the whole property, but just the chain link fence right along there. I know there is quite a bit distance there, but there is quite a bit of difference-or distance in the subdivision I was happy to be the first phase iri. So every garbage day I did a lot of pick up from homes far, far away. Also I think he is an exception to the rule and I think he does have some cattle there that actually feed, some dairy cows. So anyway, I would like to go ahead and consider the chain link fence just along that perimeter, even now. I don't know what the board feels about that, but that's what I would like to do. MacCoy: Any other questions? Okay. Thank you very much. ¢,Thowless: Thank you. MacCoy: Anyone else that has, yes sir, come forward. PLANNING & ZO~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETI~ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 17 TOM DAMS. Davis: I have the property on the east side, the reason I requested that fence was-is that my property also goes along Summerfield, and when they built Summerfield, they started along Locust Grove, and from the time that they put in the sewers and started in the houses, we didn't have any fences and it's nothing for a wind storm in the spring to push that clear over into my agriculture fields and we never got a wood fence until the third phase, but even a wood fence, it won't stop it. We picked up trash two times a week, especially on the lower end. When the wind blows with little plastic bags, piece of installation, our house is over a '/4 of a mile from there and it would get clear up to our house and we would pick up 20 acres and pick it up at least once a week. This went on for about three (Inaudible) now, and the reason I requested the fence was that the air will go through the fence, it will catch some of that stuff. If the construction, or whatever they are building, had a little more control to pickup their stuff, it would help a lot, because when I had all the trouble with Summerfield, if you went over there and talked to those builders and see if they could kind of keep it picked up, they said when the trash goes off of the property line, or the lot, then it's not there's, nobody claims it. So anyway, if they think that is a long ways for the trash to go, it isn't, especially when you are on the east side, and the westerly winds and have a summer storm or something. That's why !requested also on Hollister's I requested a fence along there to try and help stop some of that stuff. Plastic bags and all this little stuff goes out in these fields and we chop our crops for dairy cattle and a plastic, bag, or a piece of plastic, if a cow eats and stuff it can cause a lot of problems. So that is the main reason why I would like to have a fence to catch some of that and if they would pick up along that fence once in a while, because in Summerfield the trash would get that high up there against the fence, get a good blow and it would just push it over. I picked up 36 shingle wrappers one Saturday morning all over that field, because none of the builders will pick up their stuff. I think there ought to be some way (Inaudible) that they could do a little better job of keeping their stuff picked up. That is the way that I make a living. That effects the way I make a living and I spend extra time doing that,. and I've got to do it if I'm going to protect my feed. MacCoy: We understand your concern. A couple of us work jobs and we know for a fact that what you say is very factual. We understand the plastic bags, because we've had to do the same thing. Yes it can be controlled, one way is the chain link fence because the wind blows through there and on a wood fence it just--does a plane, goes over the top and away it goes. The jobs can be controlled if you have got a good superintendent, they make the subs pick up their material on a regular basis. It's part of a contract, so it can be enforced. Yes we agree with your view point and why you want it. Smith: Mr. Davis, you understand that our fencing ordinance doesn't allow fences over six feet tall? PLANNING & ZOI~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 18 Davis: I talked to Planning and Zoning and they said there was no way to have a nine foot fence, but a six foot fence would be better than nothing. MacCoy: It would be adequate. De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, I have a question. Mr. Davis, you think that if they make a commitment and particularly during the construction phase and keeping that area clean, would that be sufficient or do you still think it's still necessary for a fence. Davis: I would still want a fence because even when they put in the roads, water, or sewer, you'll be surprised of how many card board boxes there is and packing material and all that stuff unless it's gathered right up. It goes west-I mean it goes east because the wind is from the west. I don't see how they-I can't believe that they would do that, could keep it cleaned up that good, but I know they sure never when they built in Summertiled. When they first started, they were over'/ of a mile on the other side of my place and we started getting stuff right away because when the wind blows, it just keeps rolling and rolling. You get a gusty wind in the summertime in the evening or something, it moves, especially plastic and installation and these fiberglass shingle wrappers. MacCoy: This is a request that I think is very valid, I don't see having any problem with it. We are working in the side that you are one. Even construction sites that haven't got the problem that you've got--we require in the jobs that I worked on over the years, a construction fence to be put up as a temporary fence for that very same reason, to keep in control of the trash that comes off of a job. Davis: If there was a fence around the construction part of the building, well then it would probably..contain probably 85-90%... MacCoy: I think that is up to the school board as they do their contract work is to make that kind of decision with the contractor and write it into their contract... De Weerd: We could require a construction fence as well. MacCoy: We~ could require it, but also the school board is hearing the stories that we are hearing and would very much agree to work something out. Smith: Yeah but, this trash problem goes way beyond construction. You are going to have 120-150 student here in phase I, 140 of them could throw there trash in the trash can, ten of them don't give a crap and I went to school in the school district, I know.. I've driven through Eagle and seen the parking lot next to Circle K after lunch and it looks like somebody took a dumpster and dumped it over in the middle of the parking lot. I think it's got to be a long term solution, it's not just a construction... PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 19 MacCoy: Wait a minute, that's true, I think the fence that he has asked for. A construction fence is an in between thing that they do to keep the thing closer to their site. I don't know how many jobs you've worked on, but on ours we have done that for even big projects, in order to make it a second level of control, so you don't have to walk half way mile to get their stuff off that fence. So we want that thing enclosed so the superintendent can control it. I'm just saying that you have a valid point, I think it should go. I think you hear from the commission here that we agree with you. Just make a comment to the school board that they have to consider that, that's all. Borup: Mr. Chairman, I had a question for Mr. -Davis too. Just curious what you feel, what you would be more comfortable with on this site as far as trash generation in a school district doing one building, or five buildings or whatever, or 130 homes in the same location? One be better than the other as far as you are concerned? Davis: I'm not opposed to the school and I'm not opposed to the... Borup: No, I understand your concern on the trash and it sounds like-with a lot of homes, it looks to me like a lot of homes are going to generate a lot of trash than a school building over a longer period of time--cause you more problems, is that your feeling too? Davis: Not necessarily, Mr. Hollister when I tried to testify the other day and he told me to sit down. It's that if he has an R-4 he could have four homes to the acre and that's why Iwant-I asked for that time a chain link fence across his and across the school districts to help try and control some of the trash. I agree with you, the school won't produce as much trash probably on the building phase, after the kids are all there, if they put spark-field or park down there, there is going to be some trash too. lt's a problem to me, it's not-I can't get anybody to take any responsibility as far as picking it up. We picked it all up, nobody ever come over and helped us pick any of it up. Like I say, it effects the way I make a living and it takes me extra time. That's why I feel that I should have some protection, I know that it can't stop 100% of it, but when we are out there picking up two times a week sometimes for about three hours. Sometimes after a blow, I can pick you up a pickup load, and if I brought-if I was putting trash here on City Hall steps, somebody would be after me real fast. My fields are just as important to me as the City Hall steps are to you. MacCoy: We are talking about annexation and zoning, so let's get back to the subject. ' Nelson: I would like to comment on this issue. For one thing, trying to control a dozen independent contractors is different than one commercial developer with ties to the school district. Mr. Davis will have the school district to-I guess their PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 20 ear to bend and also the developer, you have a little more accountability in this issue than you did with all the contractors with residential. In either case, I think in the end you are going to end up with a chain link fence situation. I think it's a matter of whether the school district buys it this year, or five years from now. So I would prefer to see them do it now. MacCoy: Okay, can we move on? Is there anybody else here who would like to make a comment pro or con? Nelson: l would like to move that we close the public hearing Smith: Second. MacCoy: Very good, thank you very much. De Weerd: Mr. Chairman, would the school district like to respond one last time. MacCoy: I was going to ask the question and somebody jumped my... Smith: I thought you did ask the question and nobody raised their hand or stood up. MacCoy: I was going to say the next thing was the school board like to have anymore (Inaudible). That's okay, we've closed the public hearing. (Inaudible) MacCoy: No we haven't, that's true. Do you want to reduce, or back up for a moment here till we find that question out? You take back your second... Borup: Well, do we know what it is we want to find out specifically? Let's narrow it down to a specific question. Smith: I don't have anymore questions for the school district. Unless the school district has something new to add to the testimony that has been given for the three and half hours that this commission spent on this item, I think we can move on. MacCoy: I was going to be the courteous situation here, but if-since they didn't answer or raise a hand, I would say that you are probably right. Let's move forward. We've got a motion and second for closing the public hearing. Do I hear a vote? Yes or no? MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETI~ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 21 MacCoy: So the public hearing is closed. Now we are open for discussion and for a motion to make on the annexation and zoning for this property. If there is no discussion, we'll just move fonNard. Smith: I have some conditions that I would Pike the commissioner to consider on the annexation and zoning. One is the fence that we've debated here at length. I think it's important that a chain link fence be placed along the east portion of the property line between the school district property and the Davis property, on the south property line between the Hollister property and the school district property, and also on the east side of the school district property between the Hollister property and the school district property. I'm not sure exactly what we could put in for construction fencing, so I'm open for suggestion on that. Then either a conditional use permit or site plan review or staff level review of future development on this property and that we put some type of a restriction in our recommendation to not allow single family residential to be developed on this property. This annexation and zoning albeit for R-4 zoning, it is specifically because there is a school proposed for this site, not for single-family residential homes. That would follow all of the conditions that I would like to see as part of this annexation and zoning. De Weerd: I would ask why he wants it fenced on the south side... Smith: Between the Hollister property and the... De Weerd: So you want it to go down that whole road? Smith: No, no. I meant just, not at the driveway, just at the extreme southeast corner of the-not the driveway, not along the driveway, just between the- (Inaudible) Borup: The eastern boarder again. Smith: This one here, and this one here. So there is a barrier on this eastern periphery of this school district site. In lieu of doing it across--now it could go over here too, I guess, it would be-it's not much difference in length. De Weerd: That's not their property. Smith: But that's not their property, right. That's why I was saying this way. Borup: Were you aware that the other, that there were two annexations here. I mean not here right now, we've got one, but the other was addressed last time for R-4. The Hollister property, is a separate annexation there. Smith: What was the proposed? PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET _ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 22 Borup: It was forwarded on. De Weerd: Shari, was that fenced? Did we-is Hollister going to fence their property line? Stiles: I don't remember if that was your recommendation or not, but we could address that at City Council. Smith: How many acres is the Hollister property? Stiles: Ten acres. (Inaudible) Stiles: Bruce read the minutes on that, and the motion did not include fencing of the Hollister property. De Weerd: Was fencing included in staff comments? Stiles: I don't believe so. Smith: This was annexed and zoned for R-4? Nelson: While you are looking at that, Shari, isn't the conditional use request that Chairman Smith had already part of the ordinance? Excuse me, isn't the- Chairman Smith was concerned about requiring conditional use for any additional buildings isn't that already in the ordinance? Stiles: That is in the ordinance. Nelson: I think that is already covered. Smith: Okay, so there is going to be ten acres here that is to be another subdivision... Borup: The immediate intention it's going to stay a single family lot. Smith: Right, but I guess it doesn't make any sense then for... Borup: It can't be a subdivision, it has no legal access. Smith: That roadway is not wide enough. Borup: Just for private drive is all. Smith: So he could develop up to three residences there? PLANNING & ZON~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETI~ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 23 MacCoy: Three or four. Borup: Not in R-4, I don't believe. Smith: What was that one we went through? Borup: Well, that was acre lots, that doesn't make a difference. Smith: How many lots they could develop had to do with how wide the driveway was, the road. Borup: But they would have to plat it, it would have to be a platted subdivision. At this time, it's just annexed and zoned. Smith: I guess what I'm getting at is, this doesn't have legal access to develop a subdivision then. Then I would still like to see that the school district property not be developed into single family residential, whatever portion is not developed. MacCoy: Got a motion? Smith: I will make a motion, if-but I don't... Borup: The only other thing that I may throw out for discussionand this wasn't mentioned, but if another option to the fencing, it would not be cost effective in the long run, but maybe in the short run is to fence the phase one site rather than the whole property if that would accomplish the same thing. Smith: I thought about that too, but then they've got to keep moving their fence. Borup: That's what I'm saying, in the long run, it wouldn't be cost effective. Nelson: Also you get the issue where we discuss the fencing at this meeting, and then at the next conditional use meeting and then fencing would be a continuous issue. I'd rather just fence it and be done. You know what I mean? Borup: I don't think it would be productive to keep doing it every time. At this point we don't know when the next phase will be. Smith: Feel better about giving them the option. Borup: That's what I was wondering. One way or the other. t Smith: I think that is valid, I mean it's an economic decision, if they want to keep moving it, moving it and moving it, they should be able to do that. But the idea is that we want the fence up. PLANNING & ZO~ COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 24 Borup: I would hope that they wouldn't move more than once. Nelson: I still think though that even with a 150 students an operational`one building is'still going to produce trash. Borup: That's why the fence would be important. Nelson: I see, you keep that there, not just a construction fence. Borup: No, no, permanent fence at the site. It's probably better to contain, I mean the closer to the site the fence is I think it's going to contain it better. You get the thing '/ of a mile away and it's going to be blowing up over and spreading every which way. Smith: Well is there something... De Weerd: So you are asking for a site plan review and also... Smith: No, we have a conditional use permit process don't need to do that. Rossman: Now when you say conditional use permit process, that's for development of buildings beyond the initial building that they are proposing. Smith: I think we've seen enough information on this, Ihaven't-I read the minutes of the last meeting and I'm familiar with the architectural firm and they are a reputable firm. Rossman: That is a provision in the ordinance, so I don't know that it's necessary to make it a condition. Smith: Right, Iwon't-right I take that one out so, if nobody else has anything to add, I'll go ahead and make my motion. MacCoy: Well, see if it flies. Smith: Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a motion that we recommend to the City Council approval of annexation and zoning of this parcel with the following conditions, that a fence six foot height, permanent chain link fence be constructed in one of two methods. One around the north and east boundaries of the phase I, proposed phase I development, or that six foot high permanent chain link fence be developed on the east property line between the school district property and the Davis property and on the north property line, of the Hollister property between the school district property and the Hollister property. Again, on the east boundary of the school district property between the school district property and the Hollister property. PLANNING & ZO~ COMMISS{ON SPECIAL MEETI~ FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 25 Borup: Could they also have the option of running that straight down the east boundary of the Hollister... Smith: Also be given the option to negotiate with Mr. Hollister that in lieu of placing the fence between the Hollister property and the school district property, that they extend it directly south on the east property line between the Hollister property and the Davis property. The other condition would be that this annexation .and zoning is approved specifically for a school educational use, not for residential subdivision. Nelson: Second. MacCoy: Commissioner Nelson seconded it. Any discussion? De Weerd: No. ROLL CALL: Borup-aye, De Weerd-aye, Smith-aye, Nelson-aye. MOT10N CARRIED: All ayes. MacCoy: All ayes have it, it is passed, annexation and zoning for the Meridian Joint School District No.2. Any comment on closing the meeting now? Nelson: I would tike to make a motion that we adjourn. Smith: Second. Borup: Before we do, I would like to mention this is Commissioner Nelsons last meeting, unless arm twisting changes his mind. MacCoy: He gave me the option if I thought I should ask, he should be able to stay on another month. We can do that for him. Nelson: What is the status of my replacement. MacCoy: We will talk about that after this meeting. Commissioner Nelson has asked for removal from the staff due to personal reasons. Just for the audience here, he has agreed to stay on for this particular annexation, because he had been in it from the beginning and thought in fairness for everybody involved that he would be here for the final vote. I applaud that very much. Thank you. We've got a motion and second for adjournment. All in favor?. MOTION CARRIED: All ayes. MacCoy: Thank you very much for coming this evening PLANNING & ZO COMMISSION SPECIAL MEET FEBRUARY 24, 1999 PAGE 26 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:50 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.) APPROVED: MALCOLM MACCOY, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK ~~ ,, ~;;'~, ~ ^ MERIDIAN- PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING: FEBRUARY 24, 1999 APPLICANT: MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 ITEM NUMBER:.. 1 . REQUEST: .ANNEXATION 8~ ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION FROM GREG RUDDELL CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: fi CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. B • • I don't wish to make big issue, but there is one member who most likely has a conflict of interest. I have a-mail about a contractual relationship between Meridian Parks and Meridian School District for use of facilities. REc~~D FEB 2 4 1999 City of Meridian City Clerk uffic2 • • February 23, 1999 Mr. Malcolm MacCoy Planning & Zoning Chairman p City of Meridian 3 3 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 SUBJECT: Meridian School District Annexation -Technical School Dear Chairman & Commissioners: I recommend the Meridian School District annexation request be denied based on the following factual grounds and Idaho State law. Following is not in order of importance. I understand the Albertson's Foundation has denied District request for grant funding. Where is balance of money coming from? Undisclosed by district. Are we going to have portables now that grant is denied? District is asking for something they have no money to fund sand not willing to disclose source of funds. It is a dream without all necessary funds. J1. Charter for charter school shall be valid for a period not to exceed five years. 33-5209 (page 7 :of 8 attached, Idaho Code, Public Charter Schools Chapter 53, Title 33) What happens to land and buildings should the charter not be renewed? It is anybody's guess. It is not disclosed by school district. 2. Charter school provisions under the above chapter shall be review not later than July 1, 2004, and may include modifications, expansion or termination of the provisions of this chapter. 33- 5212. (Page 8 of 8 attached) r Should charter schools be terminated in 2004, the charter school site is no longer useful in its' configuration as a conventional school. School district has constantly maintained it is too close to other school sites, making it a poor site selection. Meridian Planning would be creating anon-conforming spot zoning designation, commercial in residential. 3. From Meridian School District Vision 2000 Statement, by Year 2001. A) High School Innovation -more school-to-work options, technical and vocational options. (Page 7 & 8 of 13 attached) B) Need to build TechnicaUProfessional High.School (page 8 of 13) C} `... and getting on-the job experience." (Page 8 of 13) D) Estimated Cost to Fully Implement (page 13 of 13) Professional school $20 million School district has not disclosed source of funds and this is to be implemented by 2001, two years from now. $20 million is one very large campus that covers more than 20 acres. Per • Vision Statement, this school site is not truly being phased as represented by district. There are very legitimate traffic concerns on roads, which per ACRD are not funded. Getting to the job experience means students will be working off campus part of day, creating additional traffic burdens. Disclosure of full site use is not complete and has not been presented. There is no guarantee the money is going to be available from taxes or grants and not disclosed by district. 4. Introduction, Idaho Department of Education (page 1 of 1) However, not all charter schools succeed. Therein lies one of the major differences between charter schools and other public schools. That is also problem with approving site for charter school, it may just fail. 5. Overview, Idaho Department of Education A) The charter school must detail its governance and operation in its charter. (Page 2 of 12) Has P & Z seen the charter regarding operations as required? B) Charter school requires disclosure of facilities to be used by the school. (Page 6 of 12} I understand, it is to be determined on application. There is no guarantee the verbal presentations made by district will be followed. 6. Subject annexation site violates Meridian Comprehensive Plan wherein it states very clearly these types of facilities, regardless of name given, should be located in or near an industrial zone with access to I-84. These zones generally provide good access, away from residential neighborhoods, allowing the traffic created direct access for the students off campus employment. Most of the employment opportunities are near the I-84 corridor and connector, between Caldwell and east Boise. Meridian Planning and Zoning has no assurance of success and the annexation will only create more non-conforming uses which leads to additional zoning conflicts. 3.10 Avocational-technical school shall be encouraged to locate in the Urban Service Planning Area. Such a school should be in close proximity to an Industrial Review~Area and to an interchange of a primary or minor arterial with I-84. Until a new comprehensive plan is legally adopted, the current plan is the law and should be followed. 7. The annexation request should be denied until there is full and complete disclosure to Planning and Zoning, public, patrons and taxpayers. Approval allows Meridian School District to obtain building permit without any further public oversight. Nobody is against this school concept, except location and unanswered questions. There are frankly too many unanswered questions and school district has been speaking for appeasement only, to proceed unabated by all affected parties. Chapter 52, Title 33 -Idaho ~ie • Page 1 of 8 6 s Email Directory Events Calendar Schools and Universities Search +~: Email .. .. Us .... - ~ ._ _~ _ - _ Site M Man Chapter 52, Title 33 -Idaho Code Public Charter Schools LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO t4ureau of Instructlon Charter Schools Fifty-fourth Legislature Second Regular Session - 1998 • introduction IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES • e ~ HOUSE BILL NO. 517 • e is of Pte ition BY EDUCATION COMMITTEE • school AN ACT Accreditation • t ewi RELATING TO PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS; AMENDING TITLE 33, IDAHO CODE, Testing BY THE ADDITION • ~~ OF A NEW CHAPTER 52, TITLE 33, IDAHO CODE. TO PROVIDE LEGISLATIVE d lion INTENT, TO PROVIDE AUTHORIZATION TO CREATE PUBLIC CHARTER • a ' SCHOOLS AND TO SPECIFY LIlvIITATIONS, TO REQUIRE CHARTER SCHOOLS TO BE ORGANIZED AS NONPROFIT CORPORATIONS, TO PROVIDE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND TO REQUIRE INSURANCE COVERAGE, TO PROVIDE PETITIONS TO ESTABLISH A CHARTER SCHOOL, TO PROVIDE REQUIREMENTS AND PROHIBITIONS UPON APPROVAL OF A CHARTER SCHOOL, TO PROVIDE AN APPEAL PROCEDURE, TO PROVIDE STATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT, TO PROVIDE TIIvIE LIlvIITS FOR A CHARTER, TO PROVIDE FOR REVOCATION AND TO PROVIDE FOR REPEAL OF A REVOCATION OR NONRENEWAL OF A CHARTER, TO PROVIDE APPLICATION OF SCHOOL LAW, ACCOUNTABII.,ITYRND EXEMPTION FROM STATE RULES, TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN PREPARING A CHARTER PETITION, TO PROVIDE FOR DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION AND TO PROVIDE FOR REVIEW OF THE EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF CHARTER SCHOOLS. Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho: SECTION 1. That Title 33, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby amended by the addition thereto of a NEW CHAPTER. to be lmown and designated as Chapter 52, Title 33, Idaho Code, and to read as follows: CHAPTER 52 PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS Chapter 52, Title 33 -Idaho ~ie • Page 2 of 8 33-5201. SHORT TTTLE. This chapter shall be known as may be cited as the "Public Charter Schools Act of 1998:" 33-5202. LEGISLATIVE INTENT. It is the intent of the legislature to provide opportunities for teachers, parents, students and community members to establish and maintain public charter schools whic operate independently within the existing public school system as a method to accomplish all of the following: (1) Improve student learning; (2) Increase learning opportunities for all students, with special emphasis on expanded learning experiences for students; (3) Include the use of different and innovative teaching methods; (4) Create new professional opportunities for teachers, including the opportunity to be responsible for the learning program at the school site; (5) Provide parents and students with expanded choices in the types of educational opportunities that aze available within the public school system; (6} Hold the schools established under this chapter accountable for meeting measurable student educational standazds. 33-5203. AUTHORIZATION -LIMITATIONS. (1) The creation of public charter schools is hereby authorized. Charter schools shall be part of the state's program of public education. (2) It is the intent of the legislature that the number of charter schools which may be approved in each of the first five (5) years after the effective date of this act be limited in number and geographic distribution in accordance with the following: (a) Not more than sixty (60) schools may be approved in the first five (5) years after the effective date of this act, and (b) Not more than twelve (12) schools maybe approved in any one (1) year, and (c) Not more than two (2) charters per year may be granted within an educational classification region as established by the state board of education, and (d) Not more than one (1) charter may be granted for any one (1) school district in a year, and (e) No whole school district may be converted to a charter district or any configuration which includes all schools as charter schools. The legislature further finds that, notwithstanding the limitations of this subsection (2), if fewer than twelve (12) charters are approved by October 1 of a year, the unused allotments shall be assigned to a statewide pool for use by other requesting districts. Distributions from the pool shall be made by random drawing. (3) A charter school may be formed by creating a new school or converting an existing public school to charter status. No charter shall be granted under this chapter which authorizes the conversion of any private or parochial school to a charter school. No charter shall be granted to or operated by a for-profit entity. Chapter 52, Title 33 - Idaho ~ie • Page 3 of 8 33-5204. NONPROFIT CORPORATION -LIABILITY =INSURANCE. (1) A charter school shall be organized and managed under the Idaho nonprofit corporation act. The board of~directors of a charter school shall be deemed public agents authorized by a public school district or the state board of education to control the charter school. A charter school shall be considered a public school for all purposes: (2) A charter school may sue or be sued, purchase, receive, hold and convey real and personal property for school purposes, and borrow money for such purposes, to the same extent and on the same conditions as a public school district, and its employees, directors and officers shall enjoy the same immunities as employees, directors and officers of public school. The approving authority of a charter school shall have no liability for the acts, omissions, debts or other obligations of a charter school, except as may be provided in an agreement or contract with such charter school. (3) Charter schools shall secure insurance for liability and property loss. 33-5205. PETITION TO ESTABLISH CHARTER SCHOOL. (1) Any person may request the board of trustees of a school district to establish a charter school, or to convert an existing school within the school district to charter status. A petition to convert an existing school shall be submitted to the board of trustees of the district for review after the petition has been signed by not less than sixty percent (60%) of the teachers currently employed by the school district at the school to be converted, and by one (1) or more parents or guardians of not less than sixty percent (60%) of the students currently attending the school to be converted. A petition to establish a new charter school shall be submitted to the board of trustees of the district for review after the petition has been signed by not less than thirty (30) qualified electors of the district. (2) Not later than thirty (30) days after receiving a petition signed in accordance with the specifications in subsection (1) of this section, the board of trustees shall hold a meeting open to the public for the purpose of discussing the provisions of the charter, at which time the board shall consider the merits of the petition and the level of employee and parental support for the petition. Following review of the petition and the public hearings, the board of trustees shall either grant or deny the charter within sixty (60) days of receipt of the petition, provided however, that the date may be extended by an additional sixty (60) days if the petition fails to meet the signature requirements or fails to contain all of the information required in this section, or if both parties agree to the extension. (3) A board of trustees may grant a charter for operation of a school under the provisions of this chapter if it determines that the petition contains the number of signatures required, a statement of each of the conditions described in subsection (4) of this section, and descriptions of all of the following: (a) The educational program of the charter school, designed among other things, to identify what it means to bean "educated person" in the twenty-first century, and how learning best occurs. The goals identified in the program shall include how all educational thoroughness standards as defined in section 33-1612, Idaho Code, shall be fulfilled. (b) The measurable student educational standards ident~ed for use by the charter school. "Student educational standards" for the purpose of this chapter means the extent to which all students of the charter school demonstrate they have attained the skills and knowledge specified as goals in the schooI's educational program. (c) The method by which student progress in meeting those student educational standards is to be measured. Chapter 52, Title 33 -Idaho ~le • Page 4 of 8 (d) A provision by which students of the charter school will be tested with the same standardized tests as other Idaho public school students. (e) The governance structure of the charter school including, but not limited to, the person or entity who shall be legally accountable for the operation of the school, and the process to be followed by the charter school to ensure parental involvement. (f) The qualifications to be met by individuals employed by the charter school. Instructional staff shall be certified teachers, or may apply for a waiver or any of the limited certification options as provided by rule of the state board of education. (g) The procedures that the charter school will follow to ensure the health and safety of students and staff. (h) Admission procedures, including provision for over-enrollment which specifies admission will be determined by lottery or other random method. (i) The manner in which an annual audit of the financial and programmatic operations of the charter school is to be conducted. (j) The procedures by which students can be suspended, expelled and re-enrolled. (k) A provision which ensures all staff members of the charter school will be covered by the public employee retirement system, federal social security, unemployment insurance and worker's compensation insurance. (1) The public school attendance alternative for students residing within the school district who choose not to attend the charter school. (m) A description of the transfer rights of any employee choosing to work in a charter school and the rights of such employees to return to any non-charter school in the school district after employment at a charter school. (n) A provision which ensures that the staff of the charter school shall be considered a separate unit for purposes of collective bargaining. (o) The procedures to be followed by the charter school and the entity granting the charter to resolve disputes relating to provisions of the charter. (p) The manner by which special education services will be provided to students with disabilities who are eligible pursuant to the federal individuals with disabilities education act. (4) The peUitioner shall provide information regarding the proposed operation and potential effects of the school including, but not limited to, the facilities to be utilized by the school, the manner in which administrative services of the school are to be provided and the potential civil liability effects upon the school and upon the district. 33-5206. REQUIREMENTS AND PROHIBTTIONS UPON APPROVAL OF A CHARTER SCHOOL. (1) In addition to any other requirements imposed in this chapter, a charter school shall be nonsectarian in its programs, affiliations, admission policies, employment practices, and all other operations, shall not charge tuition, levy taxes or issue bonds, and shall not discriminate against any student on any basis prohibited by the federal or state constitutions or any federal, state or local law. Admission to a charter school shall not be Chapter 52, Title 33 - Idaho ~ie • Page 5 of 8 deternuned according to the place of residence of the student, or of the student's parent or guardian within the district, except that a charter school established under the provisions of this chapter shall adopt and maintain a policy giving admission preference to students who reside within the attendance area of that school. (2) No board of trustees shall require any employee of the school district to be involuntarily assigned to work in a charter school. (3) Certified teachers in a charter school shall be considered public school teachers. Educational experience shall accrue for service in a charter school and such experience shall be counted by any school district to which the teacher returns after employment in a charter school. (4) No board of trustees shall require any student enrolled in the school district to attend a charter school. (5) Upon approval of the petition by the board of trustees, the petitioner shall provide written notice of that approval, including a copy of the petition, to the state board of education. For the purpose of implementing the provisions of section 33-5203(2), Idaho Code, the state board of education shall assign a number to each petition it receives. (6) Each charter school shall annually submit a report to the local board of trustees which approved its charter. In the case of a new charter school whose charter was granted by the state board of education pursuant to section 33-5207, Idaho Code, the annual report shall be submitted to the state board of education. The report shall contain the audit of the fiscal and programmatic operations as required in section 33-5205(3)(1), Idaho Code, as well as a report on student progress based on the charter school's student educational standards identified in section 33-5205(3)(b), Idaho Code. 33-5207. CHARTER APPEAL PROCEDURE. (1) If a local school board of trustees grants a charter for the conversion of an existing school within the school district over the objection of thirty (30) or more persons or employees of the district, or denies a petition for the establishment of a new charter school for any reason including, but not limited to, failure by the petitioner to follow procedures or for failure to provide required information, then such decisions may be appealed to the state superintendent of public instruction, at the request of persons opposing the conversion of an existing school, or at the request of the petitioner whose request for a new charter was denied. (2) The state superintendent of public instruction shall select a hearing officer to review the action of the local board of trustees. The hearing officer shall, within thirty (30) days of the request, review the charter petition and convene a public hearing regarding the charter request. Within ten (10) days of the public hearing, the hearing officer shall submit a written recommendation to the local board of trustees and to the persons requesting the review. (3) Within thirty (30) days following receipt of the hearing officer's written recommendation, the local board of trustees shall hold a public hearing. Within ten (10) days of this hearing, the local board of trustees shall either aff'uirr or reverse its initial decision. The board's decision shall be in writing and contain findings which explain the reasons for its decision. (4) If, upon reconsideration of a decision to approve the conversion of an existing school to a charter school, the local school board: (a) Affirms its initial decision to authorize such conversion, the charter shall be granted and there shall be no further appeal. Chapter 52, Title 33 -Idaho ~e ~ Page 6 of 8 (b) Reverses its initial decision and denies the conversion, that decision is final and there shall be no further appeal. (5) If, upon reconsideration of a decision to deny establishment of a new charter school, the local school board: (a) Reverses its initial decision and approves the new charter school, the charter shall be granted and there shall be no further appeal. (b) Affirms its initial decision denying the new charter school, the petitioners for the establishment of the new charter school may appeal to the state board of education. The state board of education shall hold a public hearing at its next regular meeting and shall approve the charter for the establishment of a new charter school if it determines that the local board of trustees failed to appropriately consider the charter request, or if the local boazd acted in an arbitrary manner in denying the request. (6) A charter school for which a charter is granted by the state boazd of education shall qualify fully as a charter school for all funding and other purposes of this chapter. The state board of education shall assume the role of the chartering entity. Employees of a charter school authorized by the state board of education shall not be considered employees of the local school district. (7) The finding of the state boazd of education shall be subject to review pursuant to chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. Nothing in this section shall prevent a petitioner from bringing a new petition at a later time. (8) There shall be no appeal of a decision by a local school board of trustees which denies the conversion of an existing school within that district to a charter school, or which grants a petition for the establishment of a new charter school. 33-5208. CHARTER SCHOOL FINANCIAL SUPPORT. From the state educational support program the state department of education shall make the following apportionment to each charter school for each fiscal year based on attendance figures submitted in a timely manner and time as required by the department of education: (1) Per student support. Computation of support units for each charter school shall be calculated according to the schedule in section 33-1002 6., Idaho Code. Funding from the state educational support program shall be equal to the total distribution factor, plus the salary-based apportionment provided in chapter 10, title 33, Idaho Code. (2) Special education. For each student enrolled in the charter school who is entitled to special education services, the state and federal funds from the exceptional child education program for that student that would have been apportioned for that student to the school district in which the charter school is located. (3) Alternative school support. Charter schools may qualify under the provisions of sections 33-1002 and 33-100X, Idaho Code, provided the charter school meets the necessary statutory requirements. (4) Transportation support. Support shall be paid to the charter school as provided in chapter 15, title 33, Idaho Code, and section 33-1006, Idaho Code. Each charter school shall fiunish the department with an enrollment count as of the first Friday in November, of charter school students living more than one and one-half (1 1 /2) miles from the school. (5) Payment schedule. The state department of education is authorized to make a one-time advance payment of twenty-five percent (25%) of a charter school's estimated Chapter 52, Title 33 - Idaho~e . Page 7 of 8 annual apportionment for its first year of operation to assist the school with initial start-up costs. (a) For a state charter school to receive the advance payment, the school shall submit its anticipated fall membership for each grade level to the state department of education by June 1. (b) Using the figures provided by the school, the state department of education shall determine an estimated annual apportionment from which the amount of the advance payment shall be calculated. Advance payment shall be made to the school on or after July 1 but no later than July 31. (c) All subsequent payments, taking into account the one-time advance payment made for the first year of operation, shall be made to the charter school in the same manner as other public schools in accordance with the provisions of section 33-1009, Idaho Code. A charter school shall comply with all applicable fiscal requirements of law, except that the following provisions shall not be applicable to charter that portion of section 33-1004, Idaho Code, relating to reduction of the instructional staff allowance when there is a discrepancy between the number allowed and the number actually employed; and section 33-1044E, Idaho Code for calculation of district staff indices. (6) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit any private person or organization from providing funding or other fmancial assistance to the establishment or operation of a charter school. (7) Nothing in this chapter shall prevent a charter school from applying for federal grant moneys. 33-5209 TIME LIMTTS -REVOCATION -APPEAL (1) A charter granted pursuant to this chapter shall be valid for a period not to exceen fve (5) years. c arter may gran a one or more su sequent renewa s y e original granting authority. Each renewal shall be valid for a period not to exceed five (5) years. A material revision of the provisions of the charter petition may be made only with the approval of the authority which granted the charter. (2) A charter may be revoked by the original granting authority if the authority finds that the charter school has done any of the following: , (a) Committed a material violation of any condition, standard or procedure set forth in the charter petition; (b) Failed to substantially meet any of the student educational standards identified in the charter petition; (c) Failed to meet generally accepted accounting standards of fiscal management: (d) Failed to submit required reports to the authority which authorized the charter; or (e) Violated any provision of law. (3) A decision to revoke or not to renew a charter may be appealed directly to the state board of education. The state board shall essentially follow the procedure as provided in section 33-5207, Idaho Code. Chapter 52, Title 33 - Idaho ~e • Page 8 of 8 33-5210 APPLICATION OF SCHOOLLAW -ACCOUNTABILITY -- EXEMPTION FROM STATE RULES.. (1) All public charter schools are under the general supervision of the state board of education. (2) The local board of trustees and the state board of education are responsible to ensure that each charter school program approved by it meets the terms of the charter, and operates in accordance with the state educational standards of thoroughness as defined in section 33-1612, Idaho Code. (3) Each charter school is otherwise exempt from rules governing school distracts which have been promulgated by the state board of education or by the superintendent of public instruction, with the exception of state rules relating to waiver of teacher certification as necessitated by the provisions of section 33-5205(3)(f), Idaho Code. 33-5211. ASSLSTANCE WITH PETITIONS -INFORMATION. (1) The state department of education shall provide technical assistance to persons or groups preparing or revising charter petitions. (2) Upon request, the state department of education shall distribute the following information concerning the charter school whose petition ha been approved: (a) The charter school's petition; (b) The annual audit performed at each charter school pursuant to the charter school petition; (c) By not later than July 1, 2004, the written report by the state board of education to the legislature reviewing the educational effectiveness of charter schools. 33-5212. REVIEW. The state board of education shall review the educational effectiveness of charter schools under the provisions of this chapter and shall report to the legislature not later than July 1, 2004, with recommendations which may include modification, expansion or termination of the provisions of this chapter. back to Charter Schools Homena~e [ School Accreditation -Charter Schools ] [Chapter 52, Title 33 -Idaho Code ] [Overview -Charter Schools ] [ Statewide Testing -Charter Schools ] [ ~ecial Education - Charter Schools ] [Elements of the Charter Petition ] [ Introduction -- Charter Schools ] r Vision 2000 ~ • Page 1 of 13 EDUCATION IN THE MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT ~, BY THE YEAR 2001 The Meridian School District has a vision for education - a vision that could be achieved by the year 2001. This vision entails a major change in how we manage, teach, and interact with parents, students, and the world of work. While not inexpensive, we believe this vision offers the promise of educational reform for a fraction of the cost of traditional solutions. Many parts of this vision will need to be tested, yet we believe its enormous promise makes it imperative to begin the process now. CONCERNS ABOUT EDUCATION The Meridian School District provides some of the best "traditional" education in the country. This is reflected in our test scores, the satisfaction of our stakeholders, and the perceptions of our community. This high level of achievement and satisfaction is due to dedicated and hardworking teachers, administrators, and a community that is involved and supportive. The difficulty is in "traditional." The world is changing so fast that traditional education is rapidly becoming outmoded and insufficient. The world is in the midst of change not seen since the industrial revolution. Soon every individual will have instant access to all the worlds' information. This is changing what and how we produce, how we live and- work, what we do with our time, and how we interact with our fellow human beings. Our children are entering a world where their ability to access, understand, and manipulate data will be critical. Our evolving world demands unparalleled skills in critical thinking, communication, problem solving, and teamwork. It requires higher competencies in math, language and science. To compete and succeed our children need to leave school with all these skills and competencies plus a set of work habits that allow them to pull all these skills and competencies together. There are several key concerns that consistently surface when you ask why the current educational system is unable to meet these new challenges. CONCERNS (as defined by teachers) #1. ~We have to teach 10 times more material, e.g., sex education, health, driver education, drug education etc. then we did 20 years ago in the same amount of time with larger class sizes and more special needs students. At the same time, we are asked to teach higher levels of the basics. #2. We have more and more kids entering kindergarten unprepared and without the basic language and math skills necessary to do well in kindergarten and on through school. The result is that we start off further behind. #3. We have greater disparity in the classroom between the haves and the have nots -those who have computers and supportive parents and those without resources and/or supportive parents. This takes time away from the class as a whole and forces teachers to focus on students with special needs and remedial work. #4. We have to dummy down to the lowest common denominator because of large- class sizes and the Vision 2000 ~ • Page 2 of 13 wide range of skills and knowledge in a single classroom. CONCERNS (as defined by the workplace) # 1. Kids have poor work habits. They don't show up on time, they don't take initiative or responsibility. They seem unwilling to work. #2. Too many kids don't have the basic skills of reading and math. #3. Too many kids don't know how to work in teams or how to communicate effectively. #4. Too many kids don't have the analytical and problem-solving skills necessary to the workplace. CONCERNS (as defined by the students) # 1. We aren't challenged enough. #2. What we learn is irrelevant. "I don't know why I'm supposed to learn it." #3. They don't care about me as an individual. I can't learn at my own pace. #4. There are too few options. TRADITIONAL SOLUTIONS The traditional solutions proposed to remedy these problems have been longer class days, longer school years, smaller class sizes, Pre-K classes and specialized classes. The problem with all these solutions is the enormous cost. They are prohibitively expensive in terms of plant and facilities. By far the biggest current cost in education is labor. The ongoing cost to solve these problems using traditional solutions is politically and financially impossible. Even if there were unlimited resources, it is by no means proven these traditional solutions would be successful. NEW SOLUTIONS There are some optional paths to solving some of the problems in education that do work and are far more cost effective. Some of these solutions involve technology which allows us to extend the educational day and year and increase parent involvement. Some involve changes in teaching and methodology to focus on the individual and to hold every student to a higher standard of behavior. All require enormous effort and a willin~ess to change the way we do our work. There is no one single magic bullet that will solve all the needs of education. It will take many innovations to make progress. KEYELEMENTS OF EDUCATION The proposals in this paper will require hundreds - if not thousands - of changes in the way we educate, but there are some major thrusts that are crucial to success. • MEASUREMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY We believe that measurement and accountability are crucial. Students, parents and teachers need to know where and how each child progresses and be accountable for that progress. We view measurement, however, not just as a yardstick but as a tool to design individual learning for each child. A Checkpoints System and Exit Standards are critical. Vision 2000 ~ • Page 3 of 13 EXTENSION OF THE LEARNING DAY AND PARENT INVOLVEMENT The Lightspan system and the NetSchool system, both of which are outlined in this proposal, aze designed to extend learning into the home. If these systems live up to their promise, they will add at least one hour of instruction time each day for each child, give us apre-kindergarten program, and change teachers' roles so they can design education programs for each individual child. Since both systems focus on the basics they will add approximately 30% more instruction time on the basics. Both of these systems in combination with a Checkpoints System will bring parents into in their child's education and help put all children on an equal footing. The systems are not inexpensive. Full implementation in a district the size of Meridian would involve one time cost somewhere around $25 to $30 million. While this is a lot of money, we believe that achieving the same results through traditional means such as more schools, more teachers, and more specialized programs would cost $25 million to $30 million per year. NOTE: These systems are not just adding"more hardware. These systems give each child and each home technology. When this happens it is not just an add on, it changes the whole approach to teaching to a much more individualized approach. • WORKPLACE RIGOR AND RELEVANCY These proposals place great emphasis on higher standards in academics. At the same time, they make major changes by providing relevancy between the classroom and the rigors of the workplace. There would be heavy emphasis on respect, being prompt, doing good work, working in teams, communication both verbal and in written, critical thinking, application of learning through design, vocational strands, enhanced school-to-work programs at the secondary level, and construction of a professional technical high school. _• OPTIONS AND FLEXIBILITY AT THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL We must make major changes in the high school curriculum. With only minor exceptions, we currently channel all students into a college bound track. We propose more flexibility for high school students by providing more flexible scheduling, more non-college options and more fluid transitions from high school into the world of college, technical training, and the workplace. • AMORE OPEN AND DYNAMIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The Meridian District is a traditional top down management system. We believe that to really focus on each child and to make the multitude of changes necessary to implement this program requires power sharing and decision making at all levels in the system. Just as business has done, we must unleash the power of people throughout the system. This will require a move to a much more open participatory system of management. The district's role would become one of fostering and nurturing innovation. • COMMITMENT TO ONGOING STAFF DEVELOPMENT:. Staff training is the vehicle for changing attitudes and habits and expanding knowledge and skills. Offerings must have a direct relationship to the needs of staff, reflect district priorities and be of the same standards and quality as those in the private sector. The district currently has a strong staff development program, but it must change, expand, and develop to include the training necessary to ensure success with the innovations/changes we aze proposing. Vision 2000 ~ • Page 4 of 13 • CURRICULUM The district has a strong curriculum for instruction in grades Pre-K through 12 which has served us well. In the future, development of the curriculum can no longer be conducted in the isolation of individual disciplines and courses. It must occur along interdisciplinary lines which fully integrate all subject areas. PRE-KINDERGARTEN PREPARATION Our community is not financially, politically, or emotionally ready to institute an extensive Pre-Kindergarten (Pre-K) Program that involves classrooms, teachers, day-care, administration etc. yet at relatively little cost we could implement an effective program that leaves parents in control. KEY ELEMENTS a) Early screening; A testing process that would screen Pre-K children for basic competencies and skills so parents know the areas that need attention. b) Backpack kits: A program to provide basic material for parents would help parents provide the basic training their children need to be ready for kindergarten. c) Lightspan: Lightspan is a program that uses inexpensive hardware: The Sony Playstation and sophisticated CD's that allow a child to work alone or better to work with their parents on the skills required for kindergarten. Using this system, each family would be provided with the playstation and instructions on how to use CD's to help prepare their child for kindergarten. d) Parent classes: A program to train parents in the requirements of kindergarten, the usefulness of screening, and how to use the backpack and Lightspan tools in preparing their child for school. EXPECTED RESULTS • FOR STUDENTS Every child regardless of social economic status would have the opportunity for Pre-K training and development. Parents would receive a tool for evaluating their child's progress and the means and skills to help prepare their child for school. • FOR TEACHERS While there would be no Pre-K teachers, the results of these initiatives would mean that kindergarten teachers would have a greater percent of their incoming students arriving with the skills to start kindergarten reducing the amount of remedial time. Teachers would have parents more involved in their child's learning by designing special activities for each child. • FOR PARENTS For parents these changes would allow for early evaluation and intervention. Parents would be provided with the skills and means to support their children and assist them in developing needed skills. • GENERAL RESULTS Vision 2000 ~ • Page 5 of 13 The program we propose is an inexpensive way to provide pre-kindergarten training and evaluation. It-does not involve the heavy costs of classrooms, day care, and teachers. It keeps parents involved in their children's education and gives all students a big headstart. K-S IMPROVEMENTS Changes in kindergarten through fifth grade (K-5) would involve testing, technology, parent involvement and changes in the utilization of our volunteer and non-certified workforce. The goal is to,extend learning time during the day and the year, focus more on individual students, and keep parents involved. KEY ELEMENTS a) `Checkpoints: Checkpoint is a series of tests each year designed to measure a child's mastery of the district curriculum. Parents and teachers would have the results of the checkpoints and would work together to help each child achieve mastery in all of the checkpoint areas. There is no intent to hold children back. The intent is to identify areas of focus and design alternatives that involve parents and help children master the curriculum. b) ;Lightspan: Lightspan is sophisticated educational software in the form of CD's that use state-of -the-art video technology. Lightspan provides engaging "homeplay" that allows each child with their parents to continue the educational day at home. Teachers have enormous flexibility with Lightspan. They can assign it as homework that matches the curriculum or integrate the technology more fully into their day-to-day teaching. It can be used as remedial, as enrichment, or simply as an extension of the school day with a focus on the basics. Lightspan comes with instructional tools that assist the teacher in using the program. Studies have shown children using Lightspan continue their studies for, an average of one additional hour per day. This is study on the basics of math and language which means time spent each day on the basics is increased 30%. Lightspan coupled with Checkpoints keeps the parent as a participant in education. c) Parent LinW Voice MaiV Newsletters/Conferences: With these Communications tools parents and teachers can stay involved and informed. Together with parents they can work out individual programs that enable each child to master the cumculum. d) Master Teacher: Using the "Master Teacher" concept we can have one Master teacher with two assistants in a larger classroom. This would more fully utilize the skills of the master teacher and lower the ratio of children to adults. e} Vocational Strands: Our current vocational strands help put relevancy and reality into studies and have been added to all curriculum areas in grades Pre-K through 12. These strands identify vocational connections within in each discipline. EXPECTED RESULTS • FOR STUDENTS These changes would mean a much firmer grounding in the basics and an extension of the school day learning time by approximately one hour. It would keep parents more involved in their child's education and allow parents and teachers to design a specialized path of instruction based on a child's individual needs. Vision 2000 * • Page 6 of 13 3 • FOR TEACHERS There would be closer links with parents and the yearly evaluation of each child which would allow teachers and parents to design a specialized course of instruction for each child. With children learning many of the basics with the help of Lightspan, teachers could spend more time with hands-on application issues involving the basics. Parent teacher conferences would be much more specific and individualized. • FOR PARENTS With an annual evaluation of each child's strengths and progress, parents would know what needs work and, most important, would have the means and tools to assist their child. The dialogue with teachers would be more meaningful and they would have more input on their child's education and progress. • IN GENERAL This would be a very inexpensive way to strengthen the basics and extend the learning day. We believe this program would result in a greater percent of our children entering middle school with higher self-esteem, higher levels of skill and competency, and reduce the need for remedial work. It would mean fewer drop outs and more focused children. MIDDLE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS Changes in middle school would involve lengthening study time, strengthening the basics, providing more individual learning, providing stronger advisory and exploratory classes, and keeping parents involved. It would also provide an alternative middle school as an option. KEY ELEMENTS a) Checkpoints: The checkpoint system would continue. b) Lightspan:`Lightspan would continue as remedial and supplementary study in limited areas. c) Parent Link/ Voice main/ Newsletters/ and parent conferences: These would continue on an enhanced level with the use of Lightspan_ and checkpoints. d) Net School System: NetSchools is a system where each child has a specially designed laptop computer they can use at school and at home. It has an administrative package that automatically takes roll when it is opened in the classroom, transfers homework to the teacher and transfers homework to the student, and has a testing and tracking system to track each student's individual progress. Parents can write notes to the teacher, teachers can write notes to the parents, parents can review current and up coming homework. Students and parents know the curriculum, the requirements for the course and the necessary homework. The system comes with Microsoft oiI•ice and access to encyclopedias and the Internet. The Internet is screened and catalogued to match the curriculum so students and teachers have easy and safe access to all the world's information. The system allows easy supplement to the curriculum. It allows students to go as far and as fast as they want. It helps get parents involved. A teacher could be dissecting a frog on a computer with a CD program and it would show up on each child's computer in the classroom. At some point, if a child is having trouble with an algebra problem for example, they can push "help" and get assistance in solving the problem thus providing a personal tutor for each student. Over time it would reduce the Vision 2000 • • Page 7 of 13 need for costly textbooks while providing more information more up-to-date and more relevant. With each student in possession of a laptop it radically changes what happens in the classroom. e);Accountability: Checkpoints and NetSchools will help but we need standards, rewards and punishments to make students and parents in middle school more responsible and accountable for attendance, behavior, and academic proficiency. f) Team teaching, advisory and individual attention in school- within-a-school need to be the norm in middle school. g) Exploratory needs to be tied into evolving high school programs and include more of the business worlds emphasis on work ethic, teamwork, initiative and communications. h) We need to develop the new alternative middle school concept to be effective in getting kids back into the regular high school. I) Redesign Course Description Books to mirror Career Pathways. EXPECTED RESULTS • FOR STUDENTS These initiatives would mean an extension of the school learning day, more flexibility to go as fast and as far as they choose, more relevancy in what students are learning, and having an individually designed learning program. It would also mean greater discipline and having to take more responsibility for their own behavior. • FOR TEACHERS Teachers would have some of the administrative load (such as attendance and competency tracking) handled by the computer and would have information about each student that would allow them to provide individual counsel and direction. They would receive children better grounded in the basics and would have less need for remedial work. They would have an effective tool for assigning, collecting and grading homework, and tracking individual and class performance. They would also have a great teaching tool with easy access to the Internet and other learning instruments. • FOR PARENTS Middle School is where we lose parent involvement. With this system, parents would know what is going on in each class, what homework is assigned, and have an easy means to communicate back and forth with teachers. In addition, they would continue to have annual evaluations. This keeps parents involved in the education process. • IN GENERAL Again, for comparatively little cost, we would extend the learning day, get students more involved in technology, lower the drop out rate and have more kids at higher competency levels. HIGH SCHOOL INNOVATION Changes in the high school area would involve providing more flexibili in scheduling, more relevancy in the courses, higher academic standards, more school-to-work options, technical and Vision 2000 • • Page 8 of 13 vocational options, and more workplace rigor in all activities. High school initiatives would better meet the nee soft a 60% of the kids who currently do not go on to graduate from college while at the same time allow academically gifted children an opportunity to move further and faster. KEY ELEMENTS a) Checkpoints: The checkpoint system would continue. b) NetSchool: The NetSchool laptop system would continue. At the high school level the possibilities for expanded study are enormous. c) Accountability: We would build in more real world accountability e.g. on time, no absence, high standards, problem solving and analytical skills -more rigor all the way around. d) Exit Standards: The State is toying with exit standards. We hope they come into existence. If we have basic standards for algebra, writing, etc. teachers and students will be accountable and rise to the task. While this will be a State mandated program, we hope to implement it in a way that doesn't prevent anyone from graduation. (We believe early testing would allow options for a student to graduate on time. If not, perhaps a provisional diploma or some option short of a full diploma. could be available.) The district is developing exit standards which will clearly articulate district expectations. These, we believe, will exceed those set by the State. We are also developing graduation requirements which will exceed those set by the State. e) We need to move to teaching students not just subjects. This involves something like advisory,. team teaching, composite classes, etc. fj We need to expand the portfolio system. g) We need to join Boise if they are successful in their vocational school option. 1 h) We need to build aTechnical /Professional High School There are successful models around the country where such schools focus on technical and professional areas while maintaining even higher academic standards than traditional schools. i) We need to continue to offer our alternative schools. j) We need to consider block scheduling to allow more flexibility in teaching. k) We need to let kids test out of courses they don't need and get college credit for AP classes that deserve it. 1) We need to greatly expand school to work options. m) Students should have the option of taking classes from college, technical schools, and gettin on-t a ~o experience. The whole transition from high school to other educational opportunities and the wor ~p aces ou a more fluid and seamless. The district has solidified tech prep agreements with Boise State University and the College of Southern Idaho in horticulture, business and auto mechanics. Additional agreements are in process and we are actively seeking to further expand options for high school students. EXPECTED RESULTS Vision 2000 • FOR STUDENTS Page 9 of 13 Students would have far more options: Alternative Schools, ProfessionaUTechnical Schools, Vocational Schools, College and Technical School courses, testing out of courses based on competency, school-to-work options and optional class designs. In addition, students would know exactly what they need to master to meet district and State requirements and would have the means to track their mastery. They would be able to extend their learning far beyond the classroom through their computers and the Internet. • FOR TEACHERS Teachers would have a totally different high school experience. They would have a different size and length of classes, more team teaching, more hands-on-teaching and more integration into higher education and the workplace. They would have information on each student and would be able to move much further into teaching the student rather than the subject. They too would know what competency levels are needed to meet exit standards and would know how better to assist each student to meet those standards. • FOR PARENTS Parents would continue to be involved with their children through high school. Parents would provide assistance in choosing options and would have greater knowledge of how their children were progressing. • IN GENERAL The results of these high school interventions would mean more students successfully going on to college and technical schools, more students successfully integrating into the world of work, and fewer drop outs. We would hope as a result of these interventions from Pre-K through high school to move from our current 70th percentile to an 85th to 90th percentile standing. More important, for comparatively little additional cost, we could give our children far better skills to meet the challenges of their new world. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION INNOVATION The changes outlined on the previous pages are enormous. It will take equally enormous changes in the way we operate at the district level in order to implement, nourish and manage such enormous change. We will need to find ways to overcame the communication problems size has created. We will need to find ways to share power while maintaining the consistency and high standards we have achieved. We will need to involve our public and solicit their blessing and participation, and we will need to seek funding to implement these changes. KEY ELEMENTS a) Communications: We are currently suffering greatly from being a large and growing district with a small core staff and few administrators. Communication is inefficient and ineffective, up, down and across the system. Poor communications sponsors rumor and suspicion. We must find better ways to communicate without adding bureaucracy and slowing down the organization. - E-Mail and Internet need to be used to post information on happenings such as Board meetings, key curriculum decisions, collaborative negotiations, and other key information and decisions that are Vision 2000 Page 10 of 13 made. This also needs to be interactive so input to decisions can be sought and received. - E-Mail and Internet need to be used to promote more interactive decision making. - Internet needs to be used to post lesson plans, new ideas and tips on teaching, classroom management, and use of technology. - Every teacher and administrator must be able to talk to every other teacher and administrator with ease, up, down and across the system. - We need to examine our communication process all around and look for ways to make it more thorough and more interactive without making it more cumbersome. b) We need to find wa s to be more collaborative and inclusive about ower sharin and decision making while at the same time keeping high standards and consistency. We will not be able to be innovative with a tightly controlled, totally top down process. We need to foster and nurture innovation and effective change at all levels. - Quality Teams at the high school level have started. We need to provide training to these teams and be involved in a collaborative process with them. We need to work with them to set the guidelines and procedures. - Quality Teams in middle schools should be started as soon as possible in much the same manner as the high schools. - We should look for ways to extend Quality Teams into the elementary schools, district functions and administration. - In all areas,. we need to look for ways to be more inclusive in our decision making without bogging down the system. - We need to pursue becoming a Daggett District. This would provide us with training for our quality effort, community involvement, ideas for innovation and would accelerate our whole change process. c) We need to continue the collaborative process with the MEA and extend the process to include information sharing and future planning. d)~We need to include in our curriculum development the changes that will come about due to Lightspan, and NetSchool Laptops. We also need to build in more of the rigor requested by business and more of the school to work options. e) We need to extend in-service to deal with the outcomes. of Lightspan, NetSchools, School to Work, Quality Circles, and innovation in general. fj We need to pursue the testing out of systems such as Lightspan, NetSchools, and Checkpoints. g) FIJN. In the process of all this change, innovation, and collaboration we need to remember that we are all people. At the district and administration level we need to not loose sight of the fact that work needs to be fun, that trust is essential, hard to gain and easy to lose. We have to build fun and humanity into our process. Perhaps like Southwest Airlines we need a VP in charge of hilarity. Vision 2000 ~ , Page 11 of 13 EXPECTED RESULTS • FOR TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS These changes should provide a means for teachers and administrators to talk to one another, share ideas, and participate in problem solving. It should provide a greater sense of ownership and ability to influence the system. It should give them more ability and responsibility to do what is right for their students. It should lower the fiustration levels and unleash energy to be spent on education rather than administration. • FOR INDNIDUAL BUILDINGS Each individual building would have more control and more flexibility in doing what is right for the students and parents. In addition, they would have more responsibility for doing what is right. • IN GENERAL The results of these changes would bring an administration that is mare open, more collaborative, more participatory and more nurturing of innovation. Creative energy would be released among faculty and administrators and this would enable major change to take place. At the same time, we would be able to set direction, maintain standards, and keep consistency where necessary. With all the change we would be able to deliver "more bang for the buck." OBJECTIVES OF THE CHANGE PROCESS OBJECTIVE CONTRIBUTING ELEMENTS More "Education Time" Lightspan, Net Schools, Parent Contract, Block Scheduling More Time on Basics Lightspan, Net Schools, Exit Standards, Checkpoint system More Individualized Ed. Lightspan, Net Schools, Checkpoint, Block scheduling. More Relevancy Professional Technical School, School-to-Work Basics taught around a theme, Team teaching Composite classes More Real World Rigor Tougher standards of attendance, behavior, work assignments. More communication, team skills and problem solving Higher Academic Standards Checkpoint, Exit Standards, expectations, Lightspan, Net Schools. More Accountability Checkpoint, Exit Standards, teams Equal footing for all students Lightspan, Net Schools, Screening, Checkpoint More Parent involvement Lightspan, Net Schools, Checkpoint, E-Mail More Flexibility Block Scheduling, Testing out, College Credit, Vocational options, Professional Technical option, alternative school options, School to work. Early start to learning Backpack, Lightspan, Screening, Backpack Teaching the student Net School, Lightspan, Block Scheduling, Checkpoint, accountability Participatory Administration Quality Teams, E-Mail and Internet, communication Change Agents Hardware/Software: Lightspan, Net Schools Systems: Quality Teams, Resource: In service, Daggett, FUNDING ISSUES • Grants to start the process will be needed in the areas of: ,Vision 2000 Quality training/Daggett Net School testing and early implementation Lightspan testing and early implementation Professional/Technical School design, training, construction Checkpoints and exit standards design In Service training to implement programs • Needed to fully implement the changes if they meet expectations: state money for technology Industry funding for Professional/Technical School Bond money Plant and facilities money Textbook adoption money Other grants • Ongoing costs of programs: Need to be fully funded out of on-going income • Estimated Cost to fully implement: Page 12 of 13 Net School $20 million to equip all students from 6th grade teachers. This is a one time cost. Ongoing costs would come from regular equipment funds. No additional plant and facilities, no additional Lightspan $5 million to equip all students Pre-5th grade with playstations and discs, and train the teachers. This is a one time cost. Ongoing costs would come from regular equipment funds. No additional plant and facilities, no additional Checkpoints $400,000 to develop system, train people, and work out optional solutions. Minor ongoing costs. Vision 2000 Professional/ Technical High School Quality Teams Block Scheduling Other Page 13 of 13 $20 million to build and equip. Operating costs would be much like any other High School Minor costs for training and getting up and running In service training costs to prepare faculty after which additional costs should be small Most other changes are changes in approach which require some research and training money but little or no implementation or on-going costs. MSD Home Pase Introduction -Charter Scho~ ~ Page 1 of 1 6 Email Directory Events Calendar Schools and Universities Search +~: Email ' ... .. Us _ _ .._ .<• _ ~ _,;. .: ,>:.: :, .. , •. . _ • ;•.:. , ~~~..~ Site May Introduction With the passing of Idaho's new charter school legislation, Idaho joins thirty Bureau of Instruction states in creating the opportunity for a new form of public education. The Charter Schools purpose of this new legislation is to give parents, teachers, and community ~,~ members the avenue to create new, innovative, and flexible ways of educating • Overview students within Idaho's public school system. • lee f Many questions surround this new law including the most basic considerations Petition • of "What is a charter school?" "How does it fit into the total picture of sonool Accredit ti n education in Idaho?" "How is it different from other public schools?" No a o • t e doubt many questions that will be answered in the future have not yet been Tesfno asked. • it At last count there were more than 800 charter schools operating around the d country. Many are exemplary models of outstanding education and might serve • ~ as protot es for Idaho. However, not all charter schools succeed. Therein lies one of the major differences between charter schools and other public schools. If a charter school fails to deliver the terms of the charter, it can be closed down. Many have come and gone due to inadequate planning, incompetent administration and poor education. It is important to remember that a charter school in Idaho is a public school operating independently within an existing school system. back to Charter Schools Homena~e ,~ [School Accreditation -Charter Schools ] [ Chapter 52. Title 33 -Idaho Code ] [Overview -Charter Schools [Statewide Testing -Charter Schools ] [ ~ecial Education - Charter Schools ] [Elements of the Charter Petition ] [ Introduction -- Charter Schools ] ~~ f Overview -Charter Schools • • Page 1 of 12 v ~ Email Directory Events Calendar Schools and Universities Search +~: Email ._ .: Srte Ma Overview What Is a Charter School? Bureau of Instruction Charter Schools A charter school in Idaho is a public school • Introduction authorized by Chapter 52, Title 33, Idaho Code. • Qverview (See Law). It is nonprofit, publicly funded, and • Elements of nonsectarian. It operates independently within the Petition existing public school system governed by the I conditions of its charter and all federal and state Accreditation laws. In a charter school, each student, parent and • Statewide teacher chooses to be there. Testing What Is a Charter? I ~ A charter is a contract between a local school ~ district board of trustees and the charter school. In the case of an appeal the State Board of Education may act as_ the chartering entity. The charter spells out the educational program, standards, governance and operations of the charter school. Issues such as personnel, student transportation, child nutrition, facilities, and other services are determined by mutual agreement between the charter applicants and the local school district and detailed in the charter. What Are the Purposes for Having Charter Schools in Idaho? In authorizing charter schools, the Legislature created opportunities for teachers, .parents, students and community members to establish schools. These charter schools are seen as a method to improve student learning. Charter schools should include special emphasis on expanded learning experiences for all students. Charter schools create new professional opportunities for teachers including the opportunity to be responsible for the learning program at the school. The use of different and innovative teaching methods are encouraged. Overview -Charter Schools • ~ Page 2 of 12 Charter schools also expand the education opportunities for parents and students within the public school system. What Are the Types of Charter Schools? A charter school may be formed by creating a new school or converting an existing public school to charter status. Private and parochial schools may not convert to charter status. No charter shall be granted to, or operated by, a for-profit entity. Who Governs ~a Charter School? All Idaho charter schools are required to be organized and managed under the Idaho Nonprofit Corporation Act. As a nonprofit organization the charter school will have a board of directors. The law states that the board of directors of a charter school are public agents authorized by a local public school district or the State Board of Education to control the charter school. The charter school must detail its overnance and o eration in its charter. There must be an identifiable governing body responsible for carrying out the charter. The manner of governance must be .agreed to by the granting entity, i.e. local school district board of trustees or State Board of Education. Generally the governing board or management team is composed of teachers, parents and community members, selected through a process spelled out in the charter. It is important to note that starting and running a school requires peo.~le with a broad range of skills. Charter school boards of directors should seek out people who' have skills in finance, curriculum and instruction, school law and school governance as well as other areas. What rules govern Charter Schools? Charter schools must comply with local, state and federal laws. Charter schools, however, are-not bound by all the rules of the State Board of Education or local school district policies. Charter schools should work with local school boards on how they intend to meet legal requirements. Overview -Charter Schools • . Page 3 of 12 How many Charter Schools will be in Idaho? The Legislature created a controlled procedure for establishment of charter schools. The number of charter schools and the geographic distribution are established by law. During the first five (5) years not more than sixty (60) schools may be approved. Not more than twelve (12) schools maybe approved in any one (1} year. Only two (2} charter schools will be granted within an educational region (see appendix), and not more than one (1) charter may be granted per school district in a year. No school district maybe converted to a charter district. What Happens if All the Allotments are Not Used in a Year? If fewer than twelve (12) charters, no more than two per educational region, are approved by October 1 there is a provision to assign the unused allotments. Any requesting charter school entity shall be assigned to a statewide pool. Distributions from this pool will be made by random drawing. How Does Someone Apply for a Charter? All requests for charter schools begin with the local school board of trustees. Any person may petition the board of trustees of a school district to establish a new charter school, or to convert an existing school. The application process should consist of a series of meetings, dialogues and negotiations between the applicants and appropriate district staff and school board members. The open sharing of information and ideas between all parties is essential to the process and the development of a successful charter school. Earlv. informal discussions between the applicant and the school district are encoura eg_d prior to the official petition submission to the local school district board of trustees. Existing schools seeking to convert to charter status must meet definite requirements in order to petition the local school board. A petition must be signed by not less than sixty percent (60%} of the teachers currently employed by the school district at the Overview -Charter Schools ~, • Page 4'of 12 school to be .converted. In addition, the parents or guardians of not less than sixty percent (60%)of the students currently attending the school must also sign the petition. To petition the local school district board of trustees for a new charter school, the petition must be signed by not less than thirty (30) qualified electors of the school district. What Elements Must Be in the Charter Petition The legislative intent of Idaho's Public Charter Schools is to improve student learning, increase learning opportunities for all students and allow for use of different and innovative teaching methods. The law also describes the elements that need to be in a charter. The charter should address these items completely. To satisfy the law the charter shall contain information addressing each of the following: identify the school's goals which include how all educational thoroughness standards as defined in section 33-1612, Idaho Code, shall be fulfilled. describe the school's educational program and how learning will occur. identify measurable student educational standards which describe the extent to which all students of the charter school demonstrate they have attained the skills and knowledge specified as goals. identify method by which student progress in meeting educational standards is to be measured. Overview -Charter Schools• • Page S of 12 provision by which students will be tested with the same standardized tests as other Idaho public school students. description of governance structure of the school, including the person or ' entity who shall be legally accountable for the operation of the school. process to be followed to ensure parental r, involvement. qualifications to be met by individuals employed by the school. procedures to ensure health and safety of students and staff. admission procedures, including provision for over enrollment which specifies admission will be determined by lottery or other random method. manner the annual audit of financial and programmatic operation is to be conducted. procedures for suspension, expulsion and reenrollment of students. provision which ensures all staff members will be covered by the public employee retirement system, federal social security, unemployment insurance and worker's compensation insurance. Overview -Charter Schools ~ • Page 6 of 12 public school attendance alternative for students residing within the school district who choose not to attend the charter school. description of the transfer rights of any employee choosing to work in a charter school and the right of this employee to return to any non-charter school in the district. provision which ensures that the staff of the charter school shall be considered a separate unit for purposes of collective bargaining. procedures to be followed by the charter school and the entity granting the charter to resolve disputes relating to provisions of the charter. provisions for how special education services will be provided. facilities to be used by the school. manner in which administrative services of the school are to be provided. potential civil liability effects upon the school and upon the district. documentation of organization under the Idaho nonprofit corporation act. documentation regarding Overview -Charter Schools • • Page 7 of 12 insurance for liability and property loss. Other possible considerations for Charter School Petitions: the school's mission statement and philosophy. the method that will be used for accreditation. participation in the school district's consolidated plan. manner by which Compensatory Education (disadvantaged, remedial reading/remedial math) services will be provided. manner by which migrant education services will be provided. manner by which Limited English Proficiency services will be provided. manner in which Gifted and Talented students will be served. child nutrition needs What Happens After the Local School District Board is. Petitioned? . The local school district board is required to hold a public meeting not later than thirty (30) days after receiving a petition. The purpose of this open meeting is to discuss the provisions of the proposed charter. At this meeting the local board will consider the merits of the petition and employee and parental support for the petition. After this meeting and the review of the petition, the local board of trustees has sixty (b0) days from the receipt of the petition to either grant or deny the charter. The date maybe extended by an additional sixty (60) days if the petition fails to meet the signature requirements or if the petition fails to contain all of the information Overview -Charter Schools • • Page 8 of 12 required or if both parties agree to the extension. Where Can People Go For Technical Assistance in Starting a ' Charter School? The State Department of Education will render technical assistance to persons or groups preparing or revising charter petitions in the areas the State Department has expertise. These areas include public school funding, special education, gifted and talented programs, migrant education, federal title programs, transportation, school lunch, curriculum and instruction, accreditation, Safe and Drug Free Schools, and teacher certification. Local school district personnel can provide information. Idaho Association of School Administrators The office of the Secretary of State, Corporation Division, can provide information on applying for the Idaho Nonprofit Corporation Act. What Happens After a Petition is Granted? Upon approval of the petition by a local school board, the petitioner must provide written notice of that approval to the State Board of Education. This written notice must include a copy of the charter. As each petition and charter is received at the state level it is given a date stamp and receives a number. Two charters per year are allowed per educational region so these will be allocated on a first come, first- served basis. Can the Decisions of the Local School Board Be Appealed? In some instances the decision of the local school board maybe appealed. If the local school board grants a charter for the conversion of an existing school over the objections of thirty (30) or more persons or employees of the school district there can be an appeal. If the local school board denies a petition for the establishment of a new charter school for any reason there can be an appeal. Overview -Charter Schools ~ • Page 9 of 12 There shall be no appeal of a decision by a local school board which denies the conversion of an existing school. There shall be no appeal of a decision by a local board which grants a petition for the establishment of a new charter school. How Does the Appeal Process Work? If a petition for converting an existing school is granted over the objection of thirty (30) or more persons or employees of the district, then the decision may be appealed to the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. If a petition for the establishment of a new school is denied by the local school board then an appeal can be made to the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. A hearing officer will review the action and within thirty (30) days convene a public hearing. Within ten (10) days of the public hearing, the hearing officer will submit a written recommendation to the local school board and to the person requesting the review. The local board has up to thirty (30) days following receipt of the recommendation to hold another public hearing. Within ten (10) days of this hearing, the local board must either affirm or reverse its initial decision. The local school board has the final word on the conversion of an existing school. If the local school board affirms its initial decision denying the charter for a new school, the petitioners may appeal to the State Board of Education. The a State Board of Education will -hold a public hearing at its next regular meeting and determine if the State Board of Education will approve the charter. A charter school with a charter granted by the State Board of Education is considered to be the same as any other charter school for the purposes of funding and other provisions of the law. The State Board of Education will be the chartering entity in these situations. May a Charter School Charge Tuition or Other Fees? According to the law a charter school cannot charge tuition. Fees for student activities maybe imposed Overview -Charter Schools ~ ~ Page 10 of 12 only "to the extent allowed by state law and court decisions. Who May Enroll in a Charter School? The charter should be very clear in how children will be admitted to the charter school. Enrollment must be open and free to any child. A charter school cannot discriminate against any student on any basis prohibited by federal and state law which includes disability, race, creed, color, gender, national origin, religion, ancestry or need for special education services. Admission to a charter school shall not be determined according to place of residence. F However, a charter school is required to adopt and maintain a policy giving admission preference to students who reside within the attendance area of that school. -How Big Should a Charter School Be? The size of a charter school is determined by its boadd of directors after consideration of the charter school's educational goals, facilities, etc. What About the Charter School Personnel? Charter school staff are employed by the charter school. Instructional staff shall hold a state teacher's certificate. There are some limited certification options and a waiver for which application can be made. All charter school personnel must be covered by the public employee retirement system, federal social security, unemployment insurance and worker's compensation insurance. The staff of a charter school is a separate unit for purposes of collective bargaining. No local board of trustees can require any employee of the school district to be involuntarily assigned to work in a charter school. Certified teachers in a charter school are considered to be public school teachers. Educational experience shall accrue for service in a charter school: This experience shall be counted by any school district to which the teacher applies for employment following Overview -Charter Schools ~ . Page 11 of 12 service in a charter school. The school district is to apply the same standard to this experience that they use for any other teacher coming from another area or district. What About the Charter School Site? The charter applicants must find a site for the school. A converting public school will have building. A new charter school will need one. This could be a rented prope or if funds ar re a es d a new building can be built Locating a suitable site for a school can be difficult. It is important to include such costs as maintenance, utilities, insurance, and cleaning in the budget section of the charter. Adherence to the safety code as well as accessibility needs are mandatory. The health and safety of the students and staff is also an important consideration. What is the Relationship of the Local School District Board of Trustees to the Charter School? It is anticipated that the majority of charter schools will receive their charters from local school boards. Each year the charter school shall submit a report to the local board that approved its charter. In the case of a charter school that received its charter from the State Board of Education, the annual report shall be submitted to the State Board of Education: This report will contain the audit of the fiscal and programmatic operations as required by Idaho Code. It will also contain information on student progress based on the charter school's educational standards. How Long is a Charter Valid? A charter is valid for a period not to exceed five {5) years. A charter maybe granted one (1) or more subsequent renewals by the original granting authority. Each renewal shall be valid for a period not to exceed five (5) years. Can a Charter Be Revoked? A charter may be revoked by the original granting authority if the school violates any law, fails to submit proper reports, fails to meet acceptable accounting procedures, fails to meet the student educational standards defined in the charter or Overview -Charter Schools • • Page 12 of 12 commits a material violation of any condition, standard or procedure set forth in the charter petition. A decision to revoke or not to renew a charter may be appealed directly to the State Board of Education. Can a Charter be Changed? Revisions-to the original charter petition may only be made with the approval of the original granting authority. back to Charter Schools Homepa~e [ School Accreditation -Charter Schools ] (Chapter 52. Title 33 -Idaho Code ] [Overview -Charter Schools ] [ Statewide Testing- Charter Schools ] [Special Education - Charter Schools ] [Elements of the Charter Petition ] [ Introduction -- Charter Schools ] MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING: FEBRUARY 24. 1999 APPLICANT: MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 ITEM NUMBER: 1 REQUEST: ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION FROM JAN SYLVESTER CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: C11"Y POLICE DEPT: 'CITY FIRE DEPT: C{TY BUILDING DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY WATER .DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Alt Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. i • ~EcEZVE~ FEB Z 3 1999 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Dear Mr. MacCoy, Here is the information I spoke of when we talked on the telephone. Please give it your utmost attention. The Meridian School District has been on a wild ride lately with land acquisitions. They are putting a Middle School up in an industrial zone near Franklin and Cloverdale roads. It comes complete with warehouses, railroad tracks, apower-substation, methane gas from Albertson's septic system and a lot of traffic. About 55 students will be able to walk to the school so it will also have plenty of school bus traffic. Land was purchased for an elementary school near Eagle and Ustick roads. However, due to access only being available from Eagle road the school will not be using that site. Apparently more land is being sought out since the bond did pass for the school. The land they have purchased for aTechnical/Professional school is on North Locust Grove between McMillan and Ustick....great place for an elementary school...but not a high school regardless of the amount of students it will hold. Please, it is up to Planning and Zoning to shape the future of Meridian in accordance. with the Comprehensive Plan and this resident is counting on you to take these items into consideration. I am grateful that the School District is not responsible for Meridian's planning. Thank you, ,? ~~___._~__ . . i~ ~„`, j Jan Sylvester ~ - 884-5680 From: Jan M. Sylvester <emierzwa c~Dmicron.net> To: Malcolm MacCoy, 11~iian Planning and Zoning Commission ! Date: February 22, 1999 Subject: Annexation of land for Proposed Charter High School I recommend that the request for annexation for the Charter school be denied based on the following facts and information: A) Chaster School's are new to Idaho. A copy of the legislation and Charter School Proposal are attatched to this document. The Proposal is in direct canfllict with the intent of the legislation. Chaster schools are supposed to operate independently within the existing public school system. This Proposal sets up a governing body that includes members of the School Board of Trustees, allows Meridian Schcol District to be the sole sponsor, and also makes the Meridian School District legally accountable for the operation of the Charter School. Annexation of land for this Charter School should be denied until confirmation is received from the Legislature indicating that this is a ~~alid charter which carries out the intent of the law. B) The planning has not been done for a Charter School. The Meridian School District has been play ~ning a Professional Technical Schcol far a few years. included is a portion of their V'ssion 2CG0 statement. There is no mention of charter schools. Included are exerpts from the Hudson Institute Report indicating how essential good charter planning is to the success cf a charter sc;,oel. P,Iso included is a copy of the timeline used for the LHS school development. The success of a charter school can only be measured by how we!! it meets the goals stated in the charter. This Charter Proposal contains a statement indicating that students can return to the high school in their attendance area for activities, however the Committee that requested the charter does not know if this is accurate. The Charter also .fails to mention who is on the Committee. "Sponsorship of a charter school" is not defined in the proposal. The amount of money/funding actually available to the Charter School from the District is unknown. Salty Harris indicated to me that the sponsorship was only for one year yet the Proposal does not indicate such a limit. This Proposal was formulated very quickly with many loose ends and unanswered issues. A high school education is essentia{ for success and the school providing that education should be well planned. C) The location on Locust Grove is a poor choice for this type of school. The land parcel is nct fully utilized by the school(s). There is a-large chunk at the rear of the property that sits vacant. The land and building are owned by the School District and used by the Charter School. It is unclear whether the Cistrict or the Charter School will be maintaining the - facilities. There are no PL4NS for the other 5 buildings drawn in on the plan. The Proposal states "during their final year, students will spend part of their schoal day .in a business or industrial setting learning from those already in their chosen field". A school with _ _ such a goof should be located near business or industry or at least near a mass transit line unless the School plans to provide transportaion to meet this objective. D) There is no back-up plan for the site per Wally Hendrick at the Charter School information meeeting. The school charter/and the law itself are on a 5-year trial. There are no plans for site completion. ~ In conclusion; the annexation should be denied until more planning has been done for the j.Proposed Charter School. i •::: ?, _ , ,. ~ e ~. ~ • . , `,'• Chapter 52, Title 33 -Idaho Code Public Charter Schools LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Fifty-fourth Legislature Second Regular Session - 1998 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE BILL NO. 517 BY EDUCATION COMIVIITTEE AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS; AMENDING TITLE 33, IDAHO CODE, BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW CHAPTER 52, TITLE 33, IDAHO CODE. TO PROVIDE LEGISLATIVE INTENT, TO PROVIDE AUTHORIZATION TO CREATE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS AND TO SPECIFY LIMITATIONS, TO REQUIRE CHARTER SCHOOLS TO BE ORGANIZED AS NONPROFIT ' CORPORATIONS, TO PROVIDE LIIVIITS OF'LIABILITY AND TO REQUIRE INSURANCE COVERAGE, TO PROVIDE PETITIONS TO ESTABLISH A CHARTER SCHOOL, TO PROVIDE REQUIREMENTS ANBPROHIBITIONS UPON APPROVAL OF A CHARTER SCHOOL, TO - PROVIDE AN APPEAL-PROCEDURE, TO PROVIDE STATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT, TO PROVIDE TIlVIE LIIvIITS FOR A CHARTER, TO PROVIDE FOR REVOCATION AND TO PROVIDE FOR REPEAL OF A REVOCATION OR NONRENEWAL OF .A CHARTER, TO - -PROVIDE APPLICATION OF SCHOOL LAW, ACCOUNTABILITY AND EXEMPTION FROM STATE RULES, TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN PREPARING A CHARTER PETTI'ION, TO PROVIDE FOR DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION AND TO PROVIDE FOR REVIEW OF THE EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF CHARTER SCHOOLS. Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho: SECTION 1. That Title 33, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby amended by the addition thereto of a NEW CHAPTER, to be known and designated as Chapter 52, Title 33, Idaho Code, and to read as _ follows: CHAPTER 52 _ _ _ } PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS 33-5.201. SHORT TITLE. This chapter shall be known as may be cited as the "Public Charter Schools Act of 1998." • 33-5202. LEGISLATIVE INTENT. It is the intent of the legislature to provide opportunities for teachers, parents, students and community members to establish and maintain public charter schools which operate independently within the existing public school system as a method to accomplish all of the following: (1) Improve student learning; (2) Increase learning opportunities for all students, with special emphasis on expanded learning experiences for students; (3) Include the use of different and innovative teaching methods; (4) Create new professional opportunities for teachers, including the opportunity to be responsible for the learning program at the school site; (5) Provide parents and students with expanded choices in the types of educational opportunities that are available within the public school system; (ti) Hoid the schools established under this chapter accountable for meeting measurable student educational standards. 33-5203. AUTHORIZATION -LIMITATIONS. (1) The creation of public charter schools is hereby authorized. Charter schools shall be part of the state's program of public education. 4 (2) It is the intent of the legislature that the number of charter schools which may be approved in each of the first five (5) years after the effective date of this act be limited in number and geographic distribution in accordance with the following: (a) Not more than sixty (60) schools may be approved in the first five (5) years __ .. after the effective date of this act, and (b) Not~more than twelve (12) schools maybe approved in any one (I) year, and - (c) Not more than two (2) charters per year maybe granted within an educational _ _ classification region as established by the state board of education, and (d) Not more than one (1} charter may be granted for any one (1) school district in a year, and (e) No whole school district may be converted to a charter district or any co~guration which includes all schools as charter schools. The legislature further finds that, notwithstanding the limitations of this subsection (2), if fewer than twelve (12) charters aze approved by October I of a year, the unused allotments shall be assigned to a statewide pool for use by other requesting districts. Distributions from the pool shall be made by random drawing. (3) A charter school maybe formed by creating a new school or converting an existing public school to charter status. No charter shall be granted under this chapter which authorizes the conversion of any private or parochial school to a charter school. No charter shall be granted to oroperated by afor-profit entity. 33-5204. NONPROFIT CORPORATION -LIABILITY -INSURANCE. s (1) A charter school shall be organized and managed'under the Idaho nonprofit corporation act. The board of directors of a charter school shall be deemed public agents authorized by a public school district or the state board of education to control the charter school. A charter school shall be considered a public school for all purposes. (2) A charter school may sue or be sued, purchase, receive, hold and convey real and personal property for school purposes, and borrow money for such purposes, to the same extent and on the same conditions as a public school district, and its employees, directors and officers shall enjoy the same immunities as employees, directors and officers of public school. The approving authority of a charter school shall have no liability for the acts, omissions, debts or other obligations of a charter school, except as may be provided in an agreement or contract with such charter school. (3) Charter schools shall secure insurance for liability and property loss. 33-5205. PETITION TO ESTABLISH CHARTER SCHOOL. (1) Any person may request the board of trustees of a school district to'establish a charter school,,or to convert an existing school within the school district to charter status. A petition to convert an existing school shall be submitted to the board of trustees of the district for review after the petition has been signed by not less than si,Yty percent (60%) of the teachers currently employed by the school district at the school fo be converted, and by one (1) or more parents or guardians of not less than sixty percent (60%) of the students currently attending the school to be converted. A petition to establish a new charter school shall be submitted to the board of trustees of the district for review after the petition has been signed by not less than thirty (30) qualified electors of the district. (2) Not later than thirty (30) days after receiving a petition signed in accordance with the spec cations in subsection (1) of this section, the boazd of trustees shall hold a meeting open to the public for the purpose of discussing the provisions of the charter, at which time the board shalh.consider the merits of the petition and the level of employee and parental . support for the petition. Following review of the petition and the public hearings, the board of trustees shall either grant or deny the charter within sixty (60} days of receipt of the petition, provided however, that the date may be extended by an additional sixty (60) days if the petition fails to meet the signature requirements or fails to contain all of the information required in this section, or if both parties agree to the extension. (3) A board of trustees may grant a charter for operation of a school under the provisions of this chapter if it determines that the petition contains the number of signatures required, a statement of each of the conditions described in subsection (4) of this section, and descriptions of all of the following: (a) The educational program of the charter school, designed among other things, to identify what it means to be an "educated person" in the twenty-first century, and how learning best occurs. The goals identified in the program shall include how all educational thoroughness standazds as defined in section 33-1612,. Idaho Code, shall be fulfilled. (b) The measurable student educational standazds identified for use by the charter school. "Student educational standards" for the purpose of this chapter means the extent to which all students of the charter school demonstrate they have attained the skills and knowledge specified as goals in the school's educational program. ' (c) The method by which student progress in meeting those student educational standards is to be measured. (d) A provision by which students of the charter school will be tested with the same standardized tests as other Idaho public school students. (e) The governance structure of the charter school including, but not limited to, the person or entity who shall be legally accountable for the operation of the school, and the process to be followed by the charter school to ensure parental involvement. (f) The qualifications to be met by individuals employed by the charter school. Instructional staff shall be certified teachers, or may apply for a waiver or any of the limited certification options as provided by rule of the state board of education. (g) The procedures that the charter school will follow to ensure the health and safety of students and staff. (h) Admission procedures, including provision for over-enrollment which specifies admission will be determined by lottery or other random method. (i) The manner in which an annual audit of the financial and programmatic operations of the charter school is to be conducted. (j) The procedures by which students can be suspended, expelled and re-enrolled. (k) A provision which ensures all staff members of the charter school will be . covered by the public employee retirement system, federal social security, -unemployment insurance and worker's compensation insurance. (1) The public school attendance alternative for students residing within the school district who choose not to attend the charter school.. _ (m) A description of the transfer rights of any employee choosing to work in a charter school and the rights of such employees to return to any non-charter school in the school district after employment at a charter school. (n) A provision which ensures that the staff of the charter school shall be considered a separate unit for purposes of collective bargaining. (o) The procedures to be followed by the charter school and the entity granting the charter to resolve disputes relating to provisions of the charter. (p) The manner by which special education services will be provided to students with disabilities who are eligible pursuant to the federal individuals with disabilities education act, (4) The petitioner shall provide information regarding the proposed operation and potential effects of the school including, but not limited to, the facilities to be utilized by the school, the manner hi which administrative services of the school are to be provided and the potential civil liability effects upon the school and upon the district. 33-5206. REQUIREMENTS AND PROHIBITIONS UPON APPROVAL OF A CHARTER SCHOOL. (1} In addition to any other requirements imposed in this chapter, a charter school shall be nonsectarian in its programs, affiliations, admission policies, employment practices, and all other operations, shall not charge tuition, levy taxes or issue bonds, and shall not discriminate against any student on any basis prohibited by the federal or state constitutions or any federal, state or local law. Admission to a charter school shall not be determined according to the place of residence of the student, or of the student's parent or guardian within the district, except that a charter school established under the provisions of this chapter shall adopt and maintain a policy giving admission preference to students who reside within the attendance area of that school. (2) No board of trustees shall require any employee of the school district to be involuntarily assigned to work in a charter school. (3) Certified teachers in a charter school shall be considered public school teachers. Educational experience shall accrue for service in a charter school and such experience shall be counted by any school district to which the teacher returns after employment in a charter school. (4) No board of trustees shall require any student enrolled in the school district to attend a charter school. (5) Upon approval of the petition by the board of trustees, the petitioner shall provide written notice of that approval, including a copy of the petition, to the state boazd of education. For the purpose of implementing the provisions of section 33-5203(2), Idaho Code, the state board of education shall assign a number to each petition it receives. (6) Each charter school shall annually submit a report to the local board of trustees which approved its charter. In the case of a new charter school whose charter was granted by the state board of education pursuant to section 33-5207, Idaho Code, the annual report shall be submitted to the state board of education. The report shall contain the audit of the fiscal and programmatic operations as required in section 33-5205(3)(1), Idaho Code, as well as a report on student progress based on the charter school's student educational standards identified in section 33-5205(3)(b), Idaho Code. _ _ . _ 33-5207. CHARTER APPEAL PROCEDURE. (1) If a local school board of trustees grants a charter for the conversion of an existing school _ within the school district over die objection of thirty (30) or more persons or employees of the district, or denies a petition for the establishment of a new charter school-for any reason including; but not limited to, failure by the petitioner to follow procedures or for failure to provide required information, then such decisions may be appealed to the state superintendent of public instruction, at the request of persons opposing the conversion of an°existing school, or at the request of the petitioner whose request for a new charter was denied. (2) The state superintendent of public instruction shall select a hearing officer to review the action of the local board of trustees. The hearing officer shall, within thirty (30) days of the request, review the charter petition.and convene a public hearing regazding the charter request. Within ten (10) days of the public hearing, the hearing officer shall submit a written recommendation to the local board of trustees and to the persons requesting the review. _ (3) Within tlurty (30) days following receipt of the hearing officer's written recommendation, the local board of trustees shall hold a public hearing. Within ten (10) days of this hearing, the local board of trustees shall either affirm or reverse its initial decision. The board's decision shall be in writing and contain findings which explain the reasons for its decision. (4) If, upon reconsideration of a decision to approve the conversion of an existing school to a charter school, the local school board: ~- i (a) Affirms its initial decision to'authorize such conversion, the charter shall be granted and there shall be no further appeal. - • (b) Reverses its initial decision and denies the conversion, that decision is final and there shall be no further appeal. (5) If, upon reconsideration of a decision to deny establishment of a new charter school, the local school board: (a) Reverses its initial decision and approves the new charter school, the charter shall be granted and there shall be no further appeal. (b) Affirms its initial decision denying the new charter school, the petitioners for the establishment of the new charter school may appeal to the state board of education. The state board of education shall hold a public hearing at its next regular meeting and shall approve the charter for the establishment of a new charter school if it determines flat the local board of trustees failed to . appropriately consider the charter request, or if the local board acted in an arbitrary manner in denying the request. (6) A charter schoal for which a charter is granted by the state board of education shall - qualify fully as a charter school for all funding and other purposes of this chapter, The state board of education shall assume the role of the chartering entity. Employees of a charter school authorized by the state board of education shall not be considered employees of the local school district. ' (7) The finding of the state board of education shall be subject to review pursuant to chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. Nothing in this section shall prevent a petitioner from bringing a new petition at a later time. __ (8) There shall be no appeal of a decision by a local school board of trustees which denies the conversion of an existing school within that district to a charter school, or which grants a petition for the establishment of a new charter school. 33-5208. CHARTER SCHOOL FIl~IANCIAL SUPPORT. From the state educational support program the state department of education shall make the following apportionment to each charter school for each fiscal -based on attendance figures submitted in a timely manner and time as required by the department of education: (1) Per student support. Computation of support units for each charter school shall be calculated according to the schedule in section 33-1002 6., Idaho Code. Funding from the state educational support program shall be equal to the total distribution factor, plus the salary-based apportionment provided in chapter 10, title 33, Idaho Code: (2) Special education. For each student enrolled in the charter'school who is entitled to special education services, the state and federal funds from the exceptional child education program for that student that would have been apportioned for that student to the school district in which the charter school is located. (3) Alternative school support. Charter schools may qualify under the provisions of sections 33-1002 and 33-100X, Idaho Code, provided the charter school meets the necessary statutory requirements. • (4) Transportation support.. Support shall be paid to the charter school as provided in chapter 15, title 33, Idaho Code, and section 33-1006, Idaho Code. Each charter school shall furnish the department with an enrollment count as of the first Friday in November, of charter school students living more than one and one-half (1 1/2) miles from the school. (5) Payment schedule. The state department of education is authorized to make aone-time advance payment of twenty-five percent (25%) of a charter school's estimated annual apportionment for its fast year of operation to assist the school with initial start-up costs. (a) For a state charter school to receive the advance payment, the school shall submit its anticipated fall membership for each grade level to the state department of education by June 1. (b) Using the figures provided by the school, the state department of education shall determine an estimated annual apportionment from which the amount of the advance payment shall be calculated. Advance pavment shall be made to the school on or after July 1 but no later than July 31. (c) All subsequent payments, taking into account the one-time advance payment made for the first year of operation, shall be made to the charter school in the same manner as other public schools in accordance with the provisions of section 33-1009, Idaho Code. A charter school shall comply with all applicable fiscal requirements of law, except that the following provisions shall not be applicable to charter that portion of section 33-1004, Idaho Code, relating to reduction of the instructional staff allowance when there is a discrepancy between the number allowed and the number actually employed; and section 33-1004E, Idaho Code for calculation of district staff indices. (6) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit any private person or organization from providing funding or other financial assistance to the establishment or operation pf a charter school. (7) Nothing in this chapter shall prevent a charter school from applying for federal grant moneys. - - 33-5209 TIME LIMITS -REVOCATION -APPEAL. (1) A charter granted pursuant to this chapter shall be valid for a period not to exceen five (5) years. A charter may be granted one (1) or more subsequent renewals by the original granting authority. Each renewal shall be valid for a period not to exceed five (5) years. A material revision of the provisions of the charter petition may be made only with the approval of the authority which granted the charter. (2) A charter may be revoked by the original granting authority if the authority finds that the charter school has done any of the following: - (a) Committed a material violation of any condition, standard or procedure set forth in the charter petition; (b) Failed to substantially meet any of the student educational standards identified in the charter petition; (c) Failed to meet generally accepted accounting standards of fiscal management: (d) Failed to submit required reports to the authority which authorized the charter, ~~) or (e) Violated any provision of law. (3) A decision to revoke or not to renew a charter may be appealed duectly to the state board of education. The state board shall essentially follow the procedure as provided in section 33- 5207, Idaho Code. 33-5210 APPLICATION OF SCHOOL LAW -ACCOUNTABILITY -EXEMPTION FROM STATE RULES. (1) All public charter schools are under the general supervision of the state board of education. (2) The local board of trustees and the state board of education are responsible to ensure that each charter school program approved by it meets the terms of the charter, and operates in accordance with the state educational standards of thoroughness as defined in section 33- 1612, Idaho Code. (3) Each charter school is otherwise exempt from rules governing school districts which have been promulgated by the state-board of education or by the superintendent of public instruction, with the exception of state rules relating to waiver of teacher certification as necessitated by the provisions of section 33-5205(3)(f), Idaho Code. 33-5211. ASSISTANCE WITH PETITIONS -INFORMATION. (1) The state department of education shall provide technical assistance to persons or groups preparing or revising charter petitions. (2) Upon request, the state department of education shall distribute the following information concerning the charter school whose petition ha been approved: (a) The charter school's petition; (b) The annual audit performed at each charter school pursuant~to the charter school petition; (c) By not later than July.1,.2004, the written report by the state board of education to the legislature reviewing flee educational effectiveness of charter schools. - 33-5212. REVIEW. The state board of education shall review the educational effectiveness of charter schools under the provisions of this chapter and shall report to the legislature not later than July 1, 2004, with recommendations which may include modification, e.~cpansion or termination of the provisions of this chapter. ` :~' . ~ • _.. Adopted 10/26/98 CHARTER SCHOOL PROPOSAL Charter school legislation became law, in the state of Idaho, on July 1, 1998. The purpose of this legislation was to provide innovative and expanded learning opportunities for students in Idaho public schools. It is the intent of the legislation to provide opportunities for teachers, parents, students and community members to establish and maintain public charter schools which operate independently within the existing public school system as a method to accomplish the following: _ 1. Improve student learning; 2. Increase learning opportunities for all students, with special emphasis on expanded learning experiences for students; 3. Include the use of different and innovative teaching methods; 4. Create new professional opportunities for teachers, including the opportunity to be responsible for the learning program at the school site; 5. Provide parents and students with expanded choices in the types of educational opportunities that are available within the public school system; 6. Hold the schools established under this chapter accountable for meeting measurable student educational standards. _ While keeping the above statements in mind, the "Committee for More Choice in the _ - Meridian School District" petitions the Meridian School District Board of Trustees to establish a Professional Technical Charter High School.within the Meridian School.District. This committee, further, petitions the Board of Trustees to allow the Meridian School District to become the sole sponsor of this charter school. In this behalf the following administrative structure and line of - _-- - -- - authority is to be established: - . CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD OF DIRECTORS T CHARTER SCHOOL OVERSITE COMMITTEE T _ - T CHARTER SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 1 i • Make up of the above authority groups will be: Charter School Board of Directors = Aboard made up of a parent and/or student representative(s) from the charter school oversite committee and representatives from business and industry and the School District Board of Trustees. Charter School Oversite Committee = A committee made up of representatives from charter school employees, parents and students Charter School Employees =Those employed under the charter and working at the school site The Charter School Board of Directors will lease or contract with the Meridian School District to provide a site and facilities for the operation of the school, to participate in the school district liability insurance program and to be audited by school district auditors. Further, the Charter School Board of Directors will contract to utilize the accounting and purchasing departments of the Meridian School District in its operation. Should the chanter school be discontinued at some point in time, all assets would belong to the Meridian School District. Employees of the charter school would be treated the same as employees of the Meridian School District in relation to benefits, experience and education, as well as all state and federal '~ benefit programs. Teachers of the Meridian School District who transfer to the charter school may return to the district under the same conditions as outlined in the.district transfer policy. Charter school employees will be allowed to participate in Meridian School District sponsored training, workshops and inservice as needed. Certified employees of the Charter school may form a collective bargaining unit separate from the school district bargaining unit if they desire to do so. - The administrator of the charter school and the Meridian School District will be the individual and entity'who shall be legally accountable for the operation of the Charter School. An "educated person" in the twenty-first century is a person who has completed a rigorous and relevant secondary program of studies that prepares him/her to live in a rapidly changing, global environment. Each person will leave the secondary public school program prepared with the basic skills necessary to enter the world of work and with the_ necessary requirements to go on to a postsecondary educational program. The goals of this Charter School will. be as follows: ` 1. To meet the state educational thoroughness standards 'as stated below: r 2 r , '_ . * A safe environment conducive to learning is provided # Background checks will be done on all employees # Regular fire and safety inspections will be made on the facility. # The school will be served by a school resource officer. # Zero tolerance policies will be used to remove students who are a threat to others. * Educators are empowered to maintain classroom discipline # Teachers will be empowered to hold students to a very high level discipline code. This is a choice school and discipline problems will not be tolerated. # A policy will be established requiring teachers to work directly with parents and students, where possible, to resolve discipline problems before a student is removed from the Charter School. This policy - will set a higher level of discipline expectation than is currently used in ~ the Meridian School District. * The basic values of honesty, self-discipline, unselfishness, respect for authority and the central importance of work are emphasized # Character education will be integrated into all aspects of the _. education program.- The importance of a strong work ethic will be _ _ emphasized. -- __* The skills-necessary to communicate effectively are taught - - - # Communication will be an important aspect of the Charter School . program. Communication skills including technical reading and ` writing, verbal and non-verbal skills, listening skills, and conflict resolution will be an integral part of all programs and classes. * A basic curriculum necessary to enable students to enter academic or vocational post secondary educational programs is provided # This statement is the heart of the educational program. Students will leave this program with the ability and knowledge to go directly to the workplace or into a program of postsecondary instruction. Opportunity for postsecondary credits will also be available. 3 2. 3. 4. _ 5. * The skills necessary for students to enter the work force are taught # Students will be provided hands on experiences in a work setting that will provide them the technical skills as well as the interpersonal skills necessary to enter the work force. * The students are introduced to current technology # Students will have training in the use of current technology as it relates to the field of work they choose. * The importance of students acquiring the skills to enable them to be responsible citizens of their homes, schools and communities is emphasized. # This will be the frame work of the discipline code that is established for this school.- To reduce the student drop out rate, increase the graduation rate and increase the number of college completers. To increase the degree of satisfaction among employers about the work quality of graduates. - To increase scores on standard tests, such as, ITBS, SAT, ACT, etc.. ~ _ To increase the level and""amount of involvement by parents. ___ ___ _ _ Mission Statement: - - - - - " The Professional Technical Charter High School employs the best practices and innovations of today and tomorrow to provide a quality educational experience for every student. We emphasize the lifelong application of learning, coupled with intelligent risk taking, to encourage participation as a productive member of this learning community_and society. Statement of Purpose: - It is the belief of the petitioners that learning best occurs in an environment where innovative programs empower students to be successful academically," socially and culturally. This environment sets high expectations for all students and provides"the support needed to meet those , 'fi . ~ , .. . ~ ~ • expectations through a collaboration of teachers, students, parents, and the community. This. environment also promotes respect and dignity for each individual by encouraging development of personal interests and aptitudes while acquiring skills to become successful in future endeavors. Teaching for understanding and application occurs in this environment when academic learning is immediately applied to real life situations through the use of carefully designed integrated curriculum involving student projects. In the junior and senior years the walls of the classroom will be expanded into the community with students learning and gaining experience in a business or industry setting. Student assessment will be done using the Meridian School District Checkpoint Assessment tools. Students will be required to pass a variety of assessments for each basic/core subject before credit is awarded. Students will participate in district wide ITBS testing and any other state required assessment. The charter school will employ only certified instructional staff unless waivers are obtained. Qualifications of personnel and other issues such as background checks, hiring - practices, anti-discrimination policy and dismissal policies will follow those outlined in Meridian School District policy manual. 3 ., The attendance boundary for the charter school will be that of the Meridian School District. Students within the Meridian School District will have first priority in enrollment. ._- Students outside the Meridian School District will be considered on a space available basis. The " enrollment for-this charter school will be capped at 200 students, with each grade-level also being capped.-The grade level caps will be determined as the grade level program and curriculum is developed. If more students apply for admission, in each grade level, than seats are available,, ,then a lottery system will be used to select students for enrollment. - _ . - The Charter School Board of Directors will contract with the Meridian School District to use school district auditors to audit the .charter high school. just as they do each of the high schools in the district. The audit of the charter high school will be more detailed than a -'-~ traditional high school audit and more in line.with a district compliance audit. Reports of the audit will be made to the Board of Trustees in October of each year. Provisions for governance are outlined below: * School wide governance: how the school will operate on a day-to-day basis # -.:The school will utilize block scheduling. # Site based management will be used to determine proposed policy, procedures and management. • # Five teachers will be teamed to plan the instructional program for each 100 students. # -There will be two classified employees for each 100 students. ~_ 5 !+1 # All recommendations will be presented to the Charter School Board of Directors for final approval. * Administration of the site # Administrative and counseling services will be limited at this school. The person in charge may have an administrative certificate but may serve in multiple capacities. Under the state allocation for administration, aschool of 200 only qualifies for .75 administrators. * Role of parent involvement and how this is to be enforced # The expectation is that parentslguardians will take an active role in their student's education. This will include participation in supportive activities each semester. ` * Physical plant - # To be determined. . * Food services # In the first year or two the Charter School Board of Directors will contract with the Meridian School District to provide food service on a pack out basis from nearby school within the Meridian School District. _ * Clerical support ~ _ _ # Clerical support will come: from the two allowable classified positions per 100 students. - *- - - _ Fiscal affairs - # The Charter School Board of Directors will contract with the Meridian School District to utilize the accounting and purchasing department of the Meridian School District. A separate account will be established for the Charter School, monitored by the Charter.School Board of Directors and audited by the School District auditors. * Public relations y ~ # Public relations will be the responsibility of all of the Charter School employees; students and parents. 6 * Policy # Policy will be developed by the Oversite Committee and Charter School employees and recommended to the Charter School Board of Directors for adoption. * Personnel: supervision and evaluation ` # Supervision and evaluation programs will be developed through community effort involving employees, parents and students. The administrative equivalent and board of directors will have the final responsibility for meeting Idaho state code on employee evaluation. * Custodial services # Custodial services will be provided from the two classified allocations per 100 students. PTC HIGH SCHOOL STRUCTURE AND PROCEDURES: This high school will be developed around specific occupational opportunities in the area of communications/computer technology. This will be a technology rich environment designed to give students experience in technology applications in school and the workplace. The technology used in this school will be the same used by workers in their offices, industry, manufacturing and other work environments. The difference is that technology in this school will be integrated as a _ tool into every lesson and activity. Students will leave the program with the skills necessary to enter the world of work, go on to a two-year technical program or a four-year degree program.. _- __ - . __ _~ ___ _ _ . In the first and second year of attendance at PTC high school, students will receive the basics and begin exploring career options. At the end of the second year, they will choose a major or-focus in a specific vocational area. During their final year, students will spend part of their school day in - - - " a business or industrial setting learning from those already in their chosen field. The PTC high - school will not offer an activities program, but will allow students to return to the high school in their attendance area for activities. This will be a school based on relationships -- those of student to instructor, instructor to _ _ instructor, staff to administration and school to community. The emphasis of the school will be on a collaborative, project-based, applied learning where working together, thinking, problem solving and pushing for excellence are expected. The school will promote a healthy, .spirited - - _ -_ student-body, working in a clean, safe environment. Students will be here by choice and will be challenged to be responsible for their own learning and for their environment... T 7 tt EXPANDED OPPORTUNITIES This PTC high school will not be designed for an elite group of students but rather for students wanting a different way to learn and connect the learning to the world in which we live. Students will not be given a menu of electives to choose from, but rather a program of learning activities designed around the major focus areas in communications and computer technology. Students will exit this program having completed four courses for postsecondary credit. By creating links, during high school, to postsecondary education, students will experience success with college-level work and will begin to see opportunities open to them for postsecondary study. CORE CURRICULUM The core curriculum -English, social studies, math, and science -will be based on the same content taught at high schools throughout Idaho. These courses will be unique only in the way they are taught. The curriculum will be integrated. It will be project-based and team- assigned and the course work will require both individual and group performance standards. Students will accept responsibility for their own learning and will help- each other as they research assignments, prepare reports, and present their findings to their peers. Using technology tools in their studies will require that students navigate the Internet; visit (electronically and in person) local libraries, study for tests, write notes, develop concepts and speak before groups. Every day students will use spreadsheets, word processors, a-mail, and multimedia software in completing their assignments. INTEGRATION OF CURRICULA Using block scheduling; all aspects of the curriculum will be integrated. With block _ scheduling curriculum areas can be integrated in blocks~of time ranging from one hour_to four hours. Blocks may include combinations such as English and social studies andlor algebra and geometry. Teachers with multiple endorsements will be necessary. Students will complete numerous projects during their program at PTC high school and each project will integrate all of the core cumculum areas within its development and presentation. No area of curriculum will be designed and set in stone. Curriculum review and revision will be ongoing. REQUIREMENTS Credits, to meet state requirements and college entrance, will be awarded after passing a variety of assessments for each required course. Demonstrating knowledge and understanding will be necessary to obtain credit. Seat time will not be the determining factor for issuing credit. Guidelines for discipline and attendance will be very strict. Parents/guardians will- play a key role in the operation of this school. Policy and procedures will be developed by a site based team and taken for approval to the Charter School Board of Directors. At the conclusion of each year, an annual report will be made to the Meridian Board of Trustees. 8 . ~ • Students will be required to choose one of five different majors/focus areas at the end of their second year. Majors being considered at this time are: * Certified Network Administrator * Computer Programming * Computer Repair * Website Development and Maintenance * Electronics * Information Systems/Business Applications * Broadcast Technology * Video Productions * Graphic Arts This list will be narrowed to five and may even, change as we conclude our research on the job market in technology. A team of four teachers and one project leader will have the responsibility of developing specifics of cumculum, policy and procedures. As they are developed they will go before a Charter School Board of Directors for review and approval. EXPECTED OUTCOMES -The PTC high school. will employ the best practices and innovations of today and tomorrow to provide a quality education experience for every student. It will emphasize the lifelong application of learning, coupled with intelligent risk taking, to encourage participation as a productive member of this learning community and society. 1: Students will be able to enter academic and vocational postsecondary educational programs or enter the work force with the skills necessary to be successful. 2. - -Students will be able to communicate effectively at work or in the community. 3. Students will leave the program with the basic values'of honesty, self-discipline, unselfishness, :respect for authority and-the central importance of work. 4. The high school dropout rate will be reduced, graduation rates increased and more students will complete college/postsecondary training.. 5. Students in this school will perform higher on assessment and entrance tests than other high school students. ' MEASUREMENTS OF SUCCESS - - I. Higher test scores on such tests as ITBS, ACT, -SAT, etc. 2. Lower dropout rates, higher graduation rates and higher college/postsecondary training completer rates. 9 • 3. Higher employer satisfaction. 4. Positive student, teacher and parent attitude surveys. TIMELINE September 1998 - Letter of Inquiry to the Albertson Foundation October 1998 - District Board approval November 1998 - State Board approval November 1998 - Charter School Board of Directors formed January 1999 - Five people begin design of cumculum, policy and procedure March 1999 - Student recruitment and registration March 1999 - Facilities determined May 1999 - Employees hired September 1999 - School begins CONCLUSION Change can cause chaos and uncertainty. Navigating the chaos requires a concern for and a belief in young people. It also requires the ability to dream the. future while living in the present. This adventure will not be an easy one. There will be concerns about funding, dreaming too big, being too futuristic and too optimistic. However, change will never occur if all our time is spent worrying about existing or potential obstacles. Students of the Meridian School District deserve to have a choice about the learning environment and the way learning is.delivered. This PTC high school will not be for everyone. But it will meet the needs of two distinct groups: those who desire a different learning environment and those who want to explore and possibly work in the communications/computer technology fields: It will -allow those students to connect their general academic learning to their interests as well as learn the technical skills needed in those fields. This PTC high school will pave the way for a new and different way of thinking about how students in general are educated. It can be a research and development center for ideas that work toward a better education for all students in the Meridian School District and Idaho. The "Committee for`More Choice in the Meridian School District" asks your support. and approval of this petition. _ 10 Vision 2000 ~ ~ Page 1 of 13 EDUCATION IN THE MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT BY THE YEAR 2001 The Meridian School District has a vision for education - a vision that could be achieved by the year 2001. This vision entails a major change in how we manage, teach, and interact with parents, students, and the world of work. While not inexpensive, we believe this vision offers the promise of educational reform for a fraction of the cost of traditional solutions. Many parts of this vision will need to be tested, yet we believe its enormous promise makes it imperative to begin the process now. CONCERNS' ABOUT EDUCATION The Meridian School District provides some of the best "traditional" education in the country. This is reflected in our test scores, the satisfaction of our stakeholders, and the perceptions of our community. This high level of achievement and satisfaction is due to dedicated and hardworking teachers, administrators, and a community that is involved and supportive. The difficulty is in "traditional." The world is changing so fast that traditional education is rapidly becoming outmoded and insufficient. The world is in the midst of change not seen since the industrial revolution. Soon every individual will have instant access to all the worlds' information. This is changing what and how we produce, how we live and work, what we do with our time, and how we interact with our fellow human beings. Our children are entering a world where their ability to access, understand, and manipulate data will be critical. Our evolving world demands unparalleled skills in critical thinking, communication, problem solving, and teamwork. It requires higher competencies in math, language and science. To compete and succeed our children need to leave school with all these skills and competencies plus a set of work habits that allow them to pull all these skills and competencies together. There are several key concerns that consistently surface when you ask why the current educational system is unable to meet these new challenges. CONCERNS (as defined by teachers) #1. We have to teach 10 times more material, e.g., sex education, health, driver education, drug education etc. then we did 20 years ago in the same amount of time with larger class sizes and more special needs students. At the same time, we are asked to teach higher levels of the basics. #2. We have more and more kids entering kindergarten unprepared and without the basic language and math skills necessary to do well in kindergarten and on through school. The result is that we start off further behind. #3. We have greater disparity in the classroom between the haves and the have nots -those who have computers and supportive parents and those without resources and/or supportive parents. This takes time away from the class as a whole and forces teachers to focus on students with special needs and remedial work. ---r ... .......----~----~-- --- •----~------ Vision 2000 • . Page 2 of 13 #4. We have to dummy down to the lowest common denominator because of large class sizes and the wide range of skills and knowledge in a single classroom. CONCERNS (as defined by the workplace) #l. Kids have poor work habits. They don't show up on time, they don't take initiative or responsibility. They seem unwilling to work. #2. Too many kids don't have the basic skills of reading and math. #3. Too many kids don't know how to work in teams or how to communicate effectively. #4. Too many kids don't have the analytical and problem-solving skills necessary to the workplace. CONCERNS (as defined by the students) #l. We aren't challenged enough. #2. What we learn is irrelevant. "I don't know why I'm supposed to learn it." #3. They don't care about me as an individual. I can't learn at my own pace. #4. There are too few options. TRADITIONAL SOLUTIONS The traditional solutions proposed to remedy these problems have been longer class days, longer school years, smaller class sizes, Pre-K classes and specialized classes. The problem with all these solutions is the enormous cost. They are prohibitively expensive in terms of plant and facilities. By far the biggest current cost in education is labor. The ongoing cost to solve these problems using traditional solutions is politically and financially impossible. Even if there were unlimited resources, it is by no means proven these traditional solutions would be successful. NEW SOLUTIONS There are some optional paths to solving some of the problems in education that do work and are far more cost effective. Some of these solutions involve technology which allows us to extend the educational day and year and increase parent involvement. Some involve changes in teaching and methodology to focus on the individual and to hold every student to a higher standard of behavior. All r~uire enormous effort and a willingness to change the way we do our work. There is no one single magic bullet that will solve all the needs of education. It will take many innovations to make progress. KEY EI EMENTS' OF ED UCATION The proposals in this paper will require hundreds - if not thousands - of changes in the way we educate, but there are some major thrusts that are crucial to success. . MEASUREMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY ----r.........._-- --•----~---. _. _. . -----•----- Vision 2000 ~ • Page 3 of 13 We believe that measurement and accountability are crucial. Students, parents and teachers need to know where and how each child progresses and be accountable for that progress. We view measurement, however, not just as a yardstick but as a tool to design individual learning for each child. A Checkpoints System and Exit Standards are critical. EXTENSION OF THE LEARNING DAY AND PARENT INVOLVEMENT The Lightspan system and the NetSchool system, both of which are outlined in this proposal, are designed to extend learning into the home. If these systems live up to their promise, they will add at least one hour of instruction time each day for each child, give us apre-kindergarten program, and change teachers' roles so they can design education programs for each individual child. Since both systems focus on the basics they will add approximately 30% more instruction time on the basics. Both of these systems in combination with a Checkpoints System will bring parents into in their child's education and help put all children on an equal footing. The systems are not inexpensive. Full .implementation in a district the size of Meridian would involve one time cost somewhere around $25 to $30 million. While this is a lot of money, we believe that achieving the same results through traditional means such as more schools, more teachers, and more specialized'programs would cost $25 million to $30 million per year. NOTE: These systems are not just adding more hardware. These systems give each child and each home technology. When this happens it is not just an add on, it changes the whole approach to teaching to a much mare individualized approach. • WORKPLACE RIGOR AND RELEVANCY These proposals place great emphasis on higher standards in academics. At the same time, they make major changes by providing relevancy between the classroom and the rigors of the workplace. There would be heavy emphasis on respect, being prompt, doing good work, working in teams, communication both verbal and in written,. critical thinking, application of learning through design, vocational strands, enhanced school-to-work programs at the secondary level,. and..construction_of a professional technical high school. OPTIONS AND FLEXIBILITY AT THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL We must make major changes in the high school curriculum. With only minor exceptions, we currently channel all students into a college bound track. We propose more flexibility for high school students by providing more flexible scheduling, more non-college options and more fluid transitions from high school into the world of college, technical training, and the workplace. . AMORE OPEN AND DYNAMIC MANAGEMENT SYSTENT The Meridian District is a traditional top down management system. We believe that to really focus on each child and to make the multitude of changes necessary to implement this program requires power sharing and decision making at all levels in the system. Just as business has done, we must unleash the power of people throughout the system. This will require a move to a much more open participatory system of management. The district's role would become one of fostering and nurturing innovation. • COMMITMENT TO ONGOING STAFF DEVELOPMENT ----r... .. .. ..._----•----~---~--_. .------•----- Vision 2000 ~ • Page 4 of 13 Staff training is the vehicle for changing attitudes and habits and expanding knowledge and skills. Offerings must have a direct relationship to the needs of staff, reflect district priorities and be of the same standards and quality as those in the private sector. The district currently has a strong staff development program, but it must change, expand, and develop to include the training necessary to ensure success with the innovationslchanges we are proposing. • CURRICULUM The district has a strong curriculum for instruction in grades Pre-K through 12 which has served us well. In the future, development of the curriculum can no longer be conducted in the isolation of individual disciplines and courses. It must occur along interdisciplinary lines which fully integrate all subject areas. PRE-KINDERGARTEN PREPARATION Our community is not financially, politically, or emotionally ready to institute an extensive Pre- Kindergarten (Pre-K} Program that involves classrooms, teachers, day-care, administration etc. yet at relatively little cost we could implement an effective program that leaves parents in control. KEY ELEMENTS a} Early screening:. A testing process that would screen Pre-K children for basic competencies and skills so parents know the areas that need attention. b) Backpack kits: A program to provide basic material for parents would help parents provide the basic training their children need to be ready for kindergarten. c)5 Lightspan: Lightspan is a program that uses inexpensive hardware: The Sony Playstation and sophisticated CD's that allow a child to work alone or better to work with their parents on the skills required for kindergarten. Using this system, each family would be provided with the playstation and instructions. on how to use CD's to help prepare their child for kindergarten. d) Parent classes: A program to train parents in the requirements of kindergarten, the usefulness of screening, and how to use the backpack and Lightspan tools in preparing their child for school. EXPECTED RESULTS f a . FOR STUDENTS Every child regardless of social economic status would have the opportunity for Pre-K training and development. Parents would receive a tool for evaluating their child's progress and the means and skills to help prepare their child for school. . FOR TEACHERS While there would be no Pre-K teachers, the results of these initiatives would mean that kindergarten teachers would have a greater percent of their incoming students arriving with the skills to start kindergarten reducing the amount of remedial time. Teachers would have parents more involved in ----r ... ......._-~--~---•--~---~ ------------ Vision 2000 ~ • Page 5 of 13 their child's learning by designing special activities for each child. . FOR PARENTS :For parents these changes would allow for early evaluation and intervention. Parents would be provided with the skills and means to support their children and assist them in developing needed skills. . GENERAL RESULTS The program we propose is an inexpensive way to provide pre-kindergarten training and evaluation. It does not involve the heavy costs of classrooms, day care, and teachers. It keeps parents involved in their children's education and gives all students a big headstart. IK=S IMPRO vEMENTS Changes in kindergarten through fifth grade (K-5) would involve testing, technology, parent involvement and changes in the utilization of our volunteer and non-certified workforce. The goal is to extend learning time during the day and the year, focus more on individual students, and keep parents involved. KEY ELEMENTS a) Checkpoints: Checkpoint is a series of tests each year designed to measure a child's mastery of the district curriculum. Parents and teachers would have the results of the checkpoint's and would work together to help each child achieve mastery in all of the checkpoint areas. There is no intent to hold children back. The intent is to identify areas of focus and design alternatives that involve parents and help children master the curriculum. b) Lightspan: Lightspan is sophisticated educational software in the form of CD's that use state-of - the-art video technology. Lightspan provides engaging "homeplay" that allows each child with their parents to continue the educational day at home. Teachers have enormous flexibility with Lightspan. They can assign it as homework that matches the curriculum or integrate the technology more fully into their day-to-day teaching. It can be used as remedial, as enrichment, or simply as an extension of the school day with a focus on the basics. Lightspan comes with instructional tools that assist the teacher in using the program. Studies have shown children using Lightspan continue their studies for an average of one additional hour per day. This is study on the~basics of math and language which means time spent each day on the basics is increased 30%. Lightspan coupled with Checkpoints keeps the parent as a participant in education. c) Parent Link/ Voice Mail/ Newsletters/Conferences: With these Communications tools parents and teachers can stay involved and informed. Together with parents they can work out individual programs that enable each child to master the curriculum. d)~Master Teacher: Using the "Master Teacher" concept we can have one Master teacher with two assistants in a larger classroom. This would more fully utilize the skills of the master teacher and lower the ratio of children to adults. e) Vocational Strands: Our current vocational strands help put relevancy and reality into studies and ----r ... .. .. ...----~----~---~---~ ~---------- _._-._- Vision 2000 ~ ~ Pale 6 of 13 have been added to all curriculum areas in grades Pre-K through 12. These strands identify vocational -connections within in each discipline. EXPECTED RESULTS . FOR STUDENTS These changes would mean a much firmer grounding in the basics and an extension of the school day learning time by approximately one hour. It would keep parents more involved in their child's education and allow parents and teachers to design a specialized path of instruction based on a child's individual needs. . FOR TEACHERS There would be closer links with parents and the yearly evaluation of each child which would allow teachers and parents to design a specialized course of instruction for each child. With children learning many of the basics with the help of Lightspan, teachers could spend more time with hands-on application issues involving the basics. Parent teacher conferences would be much more specific and individualized. . FOR PARENTS With an annual evaluation of each child's strengths and progress, parents would know what needs work and, most important, would have the means and tools to assist their child. The dialogue with teachers would be more meaningful and they would have more input on their child's education and progress. . IN GENERAL This would be a very inexpensive way to strengthen the basics and extend the learning day. We believe this program would result in a greater percent of our children entering middle school. with higher self- esteem, higher levels of skill and competency, and'reduce the need for remedial work. It would mean fewer drop outs and more focused children. MIDDLE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS Changes in middle school would involve lengthening study time, strengthening the basics, providing more individual learning, providing stronger advisory and exploratory classes, and keeping parents involved. It would also provide an alternative middle school as an option. KEY ELEMENTS a) Checkpoints: The checkpoint system would continue. b) Lightspan: Lightspan would continue as remedial and supplementary study in limited areas. c) mParent Link/ Voice main/ Newsletters/ and parent conferences: These would continue on an enhanced level with the use of Lightspan and checkpoints. ----r.........._----~----~--~---~ ~------~------ Vision 2000 ~ . Page 7 of 13 d) Net School System: NetSchools is a system where each child has a specially designed laptop computer they can use at school and at home. It has an administrative package that automatically takes roll when it is opened in the classroom, transfers homework to the teacher and transfers homework to the student, and has a testing and tracking system to track each student's individual progress. Parents can write notes to the teacher, teachers can write notes to the parents, parents can review current and up coming homework. Students and parents know the curriculum, the requirements for the course and the necessary homework. The system comes with Microsoft office and access to encyclopedias and the Internet. The Internet is screened and catalogued to match the curriculum so students and teachers have easy and safe access to all the world's information. The - system allows easy supplement to the curriculum. It allows students to go as far and as fast as they want. It helps get parents involved. A teacher could be dissecting a frog on a computer with a CD program and it would show up on each child's computer in the classroom. At some point, if a child is having trouble with an algebra problem for example, they can push "help" and get.assistance in solving the problem thus providing a personal tutor for each student. Over time it would reduce the need for costly textbooks while providing more information more up-to-date and more relevant. With each student in possession of a laptop it radically changes what happens in the classroom. e) Accountability: Checkpoints and NetSchools will help but we need standards, rewards and punishments to make students and parents in middle school more responsible and accountable for attendance, behavior, and academic proficiency. f) Team teaching, advisory and individual attention in school- within-a-school need to be the norm in middle school. g) Exploratory needs to be tied into evolving high school programs and include more of the business worlds emphasis on work ethic, teamwork, initiative and communications. h) We need to develop the new alternative middle school concept to be effective in getting kids back into the regular high school. I) Redesign Course Description Books to mirror Career Pathways. EXPECTED RESULTS . FOR STUDENTS These initiatives would mean an extension of the school learning day, more flexibility to go as fast and as far as they choose, more relevancy in what students are learning, and having an individually designed learning program. It would also mean greater discipline and having to take more responsibility for their own behavior. . FOR TEACHERS Teachers would have some of the administrative load (such as attendance and competency tracking) handled by the computer and would have information about each student that would allow them to provide individual counsel and direction. They would receive children better grounded in the basics and would have less need for remedial work. They would have an effective tool for assigning, collecting and grading homework, and tracking individual and class performance. They would also ----r ... .......-°--•----•--.°-. .------------ --- - - Vision. 2000 ~ . Page s of 13 have a great teaching tool with easy access to the Internet and other learning instruments. . FOR PARENTS Middle School is where we lose parent involvement. With this system, parents would know what is °going on in each class, what homework is assigned, and have an easy means to communicate back and forth with teachers. In addition, they would continue to have annual evaluations. This keeps parents involved in the education process. . IN GENERAL Again, for comparatively little cost, we would extend the learning day, get students more involved in technology, lower the drop out rate and have more kids at higher competency levels. HIGH SCHOOL INNOVATION Changes in the high school area would involve providing more flexibility in scheduling, more relevancy in the courses, higher academic standards, more school-to-work.options, technical and vocational options, and mote .workplace rigor in all activities. High school initiatives would better meet the needs o t e o o t e i s who currently do not go on to graduate from college while at the same time allow academically gifted children an opportunity to move further and faster. KEY ELEMENTS a) Checkpoints: The checkpoint system would continue. b) NetSchool: The NetSchool laptop system would continue. At the high school level the possibilities for expanded study are enormous. c) Accountability: We would build in more real world accountability e.g. on time, no absence, high standards, problem solving and analytical skills -more rigor all the way around. d) Exit Standards: The State is toying with exit standards. We hope they come into existence. If we have basic standards for algebra, writing, etc. teachers and students will be accountable and rise to the task. While this will be a State mandated program, we hope to implement it in a way that doesn't prevent anyone from graduation. (We believe early testing would allow options for a student to graduate on time. If not, perhaps a provisional diploma or some option short of a full diploma could be available.) The district is developing exit standards which will clearly articulate district expectations. These, we believe, will exceed those set by the State. We are also developing graduation requirements which will exceed those set by the State. e) We need to move to teaching students not just subjects. This involves something like advisory, team teaching, composite classes, etc. f) We need to expand the portfolio system. g) We need to join Boise if they are successful in their vocations! school option. h) We.need.ta:.b~uild.a.Technical /Professional :FIigh`S.ch~ol~There are sacce~ssfrrlels-around the ----r .. . Vision 2000 Page 9 of 13 country where such schools fQeusc~ny~lugr~al~ feasional~aFeas-wtule~maicrtaiming-ever~higher ~aca emic standards than traditional schools. i) We need to continue to offer our alternative schools. j} We need to consider block scheduling to allow more flexibility in teaching. k) We need to let kids test out of courses they don't need and get college credit for AP classes that deserve it. 1) We need to greatly expand school to work options. m) Students should have the option of taking classes from college, technical schools, and getting on- the job experience. The whole transition from high school to other educational opportunities and the workplace should be more fluid and seamless. The district has solidified tech prep agreements with Boise State University and the College of Southern Idaho in horticulture, business and auto mechanics. Additional agreements are in process and we are actively seeking to further expand options for high school students. EXPECTED RESULTS . FOR STUDENTS Students would have far more options: Alternative Schools, ProfessionaUTeehnieal Schools, opttoonal. Schools; College and Technical School courses, testing out o courses ase on competency, sc oo -to-work options and optional class designs. In addition, students would know exactly what they need to master to meet district and State requirements and would have the means to track their mastery. They would be able to extend their learning far beyond the classroom through their computers and the Internet. . FOR TEACHERS Teachers would have a totally different high school experience. They would have a different size and length of classes, more team teaching, more hands-on-teaching and more integration into higher education and the workplace. They would have information on each student and would be able to move much further into teaching the student rather than the subject. They too would know what competency levels are needed to meet exit standards and would know how better to assist each student to meet those standards. . FOR PARENTS Parents would continue to be involved with their children through high school. Parents would provide assistance in choosing options and would have greater knowledge of how their children were progressing. . IN GENERAL The results of these high school interventions would mean more students successfully going on to college and technical-schools, more students successfully integrating into the world of work, and ----r ..........__.__.---~--- ---.._____------ _ __.- Vision 2000 ~ Page 10 of 13 jr fewer drop outs. We would hope as a result of these interventions from Pre-K through high school to move from our current 70th percentile to an SSth to 90th percentile standing. More important, for comparatively little additional cost, we could give our children far better skills to meet the challenges of their new world. DI,S'TRICT ADMINLS"TRA TION INNO VA TION The changes outlined on the previous pages are enormous. It will take equally enormous changes in the way we operate at the district level in order to implement, nourish and manage such enormous =change. We will need to find ways to overcome the communication problems size has created. We will need to find ways to share power while maintaining the consistency and high standards we have achieved. We will need to involve our public and solicit their blessing and participation, and we will need to seek funding to implement these changes. KEY ELEMENTS a) Communications: We are currently suffering greatly from being a large and growing district with a small core staff and few administrators. Communication is inefficient and ineffective, up, down and across the system. Poar communications sponsors rumor and suspicion. We must find better ways to communicate without adding bureaucracy and slowing down the organization. - E-Mail and Internet need to be used to post information on happenings such as Board meetings, key curriculum decisions, collaborative negotiations, and other key information and decisions that are made. This also needs to be interactive so input to decisions can be sought and received. - E-Mail and Internet need to be used to promote more interactive decision making. - Internet needs to be used to post lesson plans, new ideas and tips on teaching, classroom management, and use of technology. - Every teacher and administrator must be able to talk to every other teacher and administrator with ease, up, down and. across the system. - We need to examine our communication process all around and look for ways to make it more thorough and more interactive without making it more cumbersome. b) We need to find ways to-be more collaborative and inclusive about power sharing_and decision making while at the same time keeping high standards and consistency. We will not be able to be innovative with a tightly controlled, totally top down process. We need to foster and nurture innovation and effective change at all levels. - Quality Teams at the high school level have started. We need to provide training to these teams and be involved in a collaborative process with them. We need to work with them to set the guidelines and procedures. - Quality Teams in middle schools should be started as soon as possible in much the same manner as the high schools. - We should look for ways to extend Quality Teams into the elementary schools, district functions Vision 2000 ~ ~ Page 11 of 13 and administration. - In all areas, we need to look for ways to be more inclusive in our decision making without bogging down the system. - We need to pursue becoming a Daggett District. This would provide us with training for our quality effort, community involvement, ideas for innovation and would accelerate our whole change process. c) We need to continue the collaborative process with the MEA and extend the process to include information sharing and future planning. d)' We need to include in our curriculum development the changes that will come about due to Lightspan, and NetSchool Laptops. We also need to build in more of the rigor requested by business anal more of the school to work options. e) We need to extend in-service to deal with the outcomes of Lightspan, NetSchools, School to Work, Quality Circles, and innovation in general. f) We need to pursue the testing out of systems such as Lightspan, NetSchools, and Checkpoints. g) FUN. In the process of all this change, innovation, and collaboration we need to remember that we - are all people. At the district and administration level we need to not loose sight of the fact that work needs to be fun, _thattt;.' shave to build fun and humanity into ourpra~ess. I'erhaps7ke Southwest Airlines we nee a in charge of hilarit . EXPECTED RESULTS . FOR TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS These changes should provide a means for teachers and administrators to talk to one another, share ideas, and participate in problem solving. It should provide a greater sense of ownership and ability to influence the system. It should give them more ability and responsibility to do what is right for their students. It should lower the frustration levels and unleash energy to be spent on education rather than administration. . FOR INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS Each individual building would have more control and more flexibility in doing what is right for the students and parents. In addition, they would have more responsibility for doing what is right. . IN GENERAL The results of these changes would bring an administration that is more open, more collaborative, more participatory and more nurturing of innovation. Creative energy would be released among faculty and administrators and this would enable major change to take place. At the same time, we would be able to set direction, maintain standards, and keep consistency where necessary. With all the change we would be able to deliver "more bang for the buck." OBJECTIVES OF THE CHANGE PROCESS Vision 2000- • • Page l2 of 13 (~I3.IECTIYE CONTRIBUTING ELEMENTS" More "Education Time" Lightspan, Net Schools, Parent Contract, Block Scheduling More Time on Basics Lightspan, Net Schools, Exit Standards, Checkpoint system More Individualized Ed. Lightspan, Net Schools, Checkpoint, Block scheduling. More Relevancy Professional Technical School, School-to-Work Basics taught around a theme, Team teaching Composite classes More Real World Rigor Tougher standards of attendance, behavior, work assignments. More communication, team skills and problem solving Higher Academic Standards Checkpoint, Exit Standards, expectations, .Lightspan, Net Schools. More Accountability Checkpoint, Exit Standards,. teams Equal footing for all students Lightspan, Net Schools, Screening, Checkpoint More Parent involvement Lightspan, Net Schools, Checkpoint, E-Mail More Flexibility Block Scheduling, Testing out, College Credit, Vocational options, Professional Technical option, alternative school options, School to work. Early start to learning Backpack, Lightspan, Screening, Backpack Teaching the student Net School, Lightspan, Block Scheduling, Checkpoint, accountability Participatory Administration Quality Teams, E-Mail and Internet, communication Change Agents Hardware/Software: Lightspan, Net Schools Systems: Quality Teams, Resource: In service, Daggett, FUNDING ISSUES' . Grants to start the process will be needed in-the areas of: Quality training/Daggett Net School testing and early implementation Lightspan testing and early implementation Professional/Technical School design, training, construction Checkpoints and exit standards design In Service training to implement programs . Needed to fully implement the changes if they meet expectations: State-money for technology Industry funding for Professional/Technical School Bond money Plant and facilities money Textbook -a~-ption money Other grants Vision 2000 . . Page 13 of 13 . Ongoing costs of programs: Need to be fully funded out of on-going income . Estimated Cost to fully implement: Net School $20 million to equip all students from 6th grade up with laptops, teachers. This is a one time cost. Ongoing costs would come from regular equipment funds. No ~ additional plant and facilities, no additional ongoing labor costs. Lightspan $5 million to equip all students Pre-5th grade with playstations and discs, and train the teachers. This is a one time cost. Ongoing costs would come from regular equipment funds. No additional plant and facilities, no additional ongoing labor costs. Checkpoints $400,000 to develop system, train people, and work out optional solutions. Minor ongoing costs. Professional/ $20 million to build and equip. Operating costs Technical High School would be much like any other Hiqh School Quality Teams Minor costs for training and getting up and running Block Scheduling In service training costs to prepare faculty ° after which additional costs should be small Other Most other changes are changes in approach which require some research and training R money but little or no implementation or on-going costs. MS:D .Home Page Charter School Final Report,~rt IV ~ Page 1 of 1 a HUDSON INSTITUTE ~~arter Schools in Action Project Final .Report, Part IV August 1997 "Charter School Accountability; Problems and Prospects" b~° Bnano V. ~~Ianno, Chester E. Finn, Jr., Louann A. Bierlein, and Greg Vanourek Introduction Over the last two years, the "Charter Schools in Action" research team has been to 14 states, visited 60 schools. and interviewed more than- 1,300 individuals about the start-up difficulties that charter schools face. We also surveyed thousands of parents, teachers, and students regarding the accomplishments and shortcomings of their charter schools. Among the most challenging and complicated ~-~~ ~ ~'~~w~~, ~c~~xc~ it ~~c~ ~ ,~-,~-~- r. . ~ C I.,~ ~ ~- ~ CIS ~ ~-~, ~ -~-,,y~ ----r... .. .. ...--------------~----' -------• ~- Charter School Final Report, II ` Page 1 of 1 6) A late, rushed, frantic start that causes all sorts of things to begin badly. We went into this problem at length last year. The essential point is that many charter schools open for business without enough planning, especially. the practical start-up kind (e.g., getting the staff, the curriculum, and the building ready) that must usually happen between nailing down the charter and greeting the first children. Too often, this all gets crammed into a few wild weeks in the summer. Such schools almost always limp at the beginning-and would have been far better served had six additional months been available. The adjnisaistration chases grarats. Thera we have to look as if we're doing w}iat tlae grant is srcpposed to be pa~~ing for. This wreaks Izavoe with the program we designed " - Tex~~s teacher Sometimes this problem is within the school's power to anticipate and solve. We've seen charter founders who intentionally build an extra year into their plans so as to give themselves time for a smooth opening. But most often the rush is caused in large part by a poorly planned'state (or local) application review cycle that doesn't deliver, final decisions or formal charter contracts until, sav. June. Several states have figured this out and are launching their application and review cycles much earlier. Although the Texas legislature raised the Lone Star State's charter "cap" in spring 1997, the State Board of Education decided to proceed with deliberate speed and the cycle now commencing will not produce new schools until fall 1998. Arizona was accepting applications in June 1997 for schools to open in fall 1998. The District of Columbia is on a similar calendar. "i~'e opened too fast The farst semester was awful Now it's better. " -Texas school head We hope that these e.Ytended cycles will give successful applicants. more time to get ready. But they could turn out only to give state officials more leisure to review the applications. Charter founders who take-or are given-extra time to get their schools ready to open commonly find themselves ire yet another. resource bind. Start-up funding of some kind is needed, for example; to pay key people doing the planning and the training (and getting trainedj, not to mention purchasing such mundane items as books and paint. An equity issue lurks here. It could turn out that a longer lead time sans start-up funding favors charter~schools initiated by prosperous people and agencies. But too little lead time does nobody any favors. (7) Governance anal management challenges.. As we observed last year, the people who found charter schools aren't necessarily the perfect choices to run them. Zealous parents, in particular, often have difficulty yielding the school's reins to - ----r... ......._--•------- - Charter School Final Report~-t IV :a . Page 1 of 1 Awarding a Charter :The charter accountability process begins with the charter issuer or sponsor. It is that entity's responsibility to review the charter proposal for evidence that the document satisfies the requirements that the approving authority has established for awarding a charter; and to determine whether the people involved have the sound character, decent credit ratings, and capacity to deliver that which the document promises. We've come across several examples of thoughtful and thorough charter application processes, but they are far from universal. The District of Columbia is an interesting case in point, for it illustrates how one charter issuer used ales-than-adequate process while a different sponsor has created a process that looks to be exemplary. One of the sorriest tales in the charter world in 1996-97 involved the Marcus Garvey Charter School. (~s we write, lawsuits arising from this episode are being heard in Washington courtrooms.) In this case, the elected D.C. school board was responsible for issuing the charter. It evidently did so in great haste and without even rudimentary background investigations of the people involved. During this school year, an incident occurred at the school that required police intervention. During the ensuing investivation, officials discovered that the school principal had employed an individual with a criminal recordv(The principal herself also had a pretty complicated history.) It appears the school board did an altogether inadequate job in its initial approval of this charter request. But there is also good news emanating from the District. In addition to the elected D.C. school board, the District's charter law (enacted by Congress) creates a special charter board that can also approve charter requests. That appourted board recently issued a request for proposals (RFP) for schools to open as early as January 1998. They seem to have learned a lesson from the Garvey debacle. Their 24- paQe RFP is a thoughtful and well-organized approach with clearly stated expectations, schedules, and assurance requirements. While the proof will be in the pudding, it appears to us that the special charter board is off to a sound beginning.. - Charter approval should be seen as a key element of the accountability process. It establishes what the school is expected to do-the results it is committed to produce. These expectations are then formalized in the contractual agreement between those creating the school and those issuing its charter. The _ agreement amounts to the school's constitution: Without a clear set of expectations, it's nearly impossible later to reach a fair judgment about renewing~or terminating a charter. If this first step is done correctly, much trouble can be avoided later in the life of the charter school. (See Part-II of our report on the "life cycle" of charter schools for a discussion of several problems that result from an inadequate or hasty charter application process.) Taking greater care in issuing a charter minimizes the risk that there will be a failure later. But failures- and near failures-may still occur ----r..........--------------•----- -------• ---°-- -•------ LHS Profile: Installment #2 Pale 1 of 1 cases. Additional strategies will be examined more closely in future installments. II. Development Timeline and Staffing The following is an approximate timeline of the school's development prior to opening the doors: Year 1. School's founder attends Harvard University's Graduate School of Education and John F. Kennedy School of Government where he explores the concept of charter schools and initiates a "charter school research group." . Year Z. School's founder returns to San Francisco and begins to test the evolving ideas for a charter school with key education stakeholders, experts, and members of the community. During the summer of 1996, LHS pilots the school's instructional philosophy through an eight-week summer program. The founder also builds a Board of Trustees and Advisory Board. ' • Year 3. LHS development group begins application process and facilities search during the fall and wins approval for the charter in December. Initial school planning and student recruitment take place in the spring, teachers are hired over the summer, and school doors open in September. Fo'r the purposes of analysis, the different components of the above timeline can be grouped into the following stages. Please note that Year 3 is divided into two stages, Charter Negotiation and School Development. This installment focuses on the first three stages: Inquiry, Design, and Charter Negotiation. The different components of the School Development stage will be the focus of the next installment. inquiry Stage } i ~ ~ I Examines charters during graduateschool classes in education . Maintains "Charter School Research Group" . Completes internship at alternative high school .: Attends CANEC conference • Receives small planning grant i ~ Year 1 ~ Sept. 94 ~-July 95! iii !~ 1--_ ` __ ______ ~ __ ~ • Local needs assessment through meetings with SF j 1 education experts i Design Stage i . Local needs assessment through meetings with SF parents ~ Year 2 { July 95 ~ ' .and community leaders ~ ~ ~ Sepf 90^ ~+ ~ i ..Summer demonstration program ~ , . ~ • Final drafting of charter ~--~~ Ch • Collection of teacher signatures Year 3 ~ arter Negotiation ~ • Formation of Advisory Group Sept. 96; Stage • Interview sessions with individua{ school board members -Sept. ~ i . Submission of charter application 97 ~ ~L ------- ~ -- - - ~ -; . Facilities search - i i School Fundraising Year 3 ~ Development . Formation of Board Sept. 96 y Stage • Recruitment and admissions of students -Sept. • Hiring of teachers 97 I _ ~-~- W i,U W ~ US C ~G ifZ~ r-S C~ ~1 S , G 2 / ~~. 2d ~ ~,. _. ` // fl.::, ..._. ~t F w., ~~/ ~ ` ~~ ~`~ ~ _ x C G7 r S L s U~ -i m r I. Kz 7 I' 1 1 ~' ~~ i~ I I.. I ~~ ~~Ij~I ~ VIII 1 - ~ _ _ :J 111111 _ _L~I'TTP ;I(-I~:~ ~... ~.. - 1 I 1 1', h - - _ ~Yj--~~ -~ ~ - I _ j " 1 Y ~ 1 _- -.1 ___ _` _ ~i 1~ I I ~_ --'i - ~ I _ 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - ° ... -. _ _ __ _ 1 I 1 I I 1 ~ I ~. - _- ;- - az I~I II n = I F ' I 'I I I ~ ail ~ _ ,11~ 1 `1~1i ~ I =~ ~ i 1' 1~ _ ~. " -, .. _ .. .. .... ._. _ _ - 1 1 ~ ~: ~ a;,~1 ~ ____ ~:~ h~ d ~~-- __- 1 ~;m;~, ~ 1 I 1 / t I I M~2si I bid 5S ----- 1 i\U~J71nln ~~~1 I 1{{ ' S~,e c ~ N1 ~- ~~ s ~ ~, ;~ I I 1 S'~~\t, ~ I r- l \v~~~ 1 I 1 I 1 ~ I 1 ~~ e :, u~ m ~I, rn ~~ ~ I ~ I ~ jr: ~± ~ ~ ' I` ~ ~ ~;,` ~~;, °7~?.'•t.. ~. ~~l~i:??:Iy ~_ ~ ~.~ 1 }: R. r a-- '_ ~ \,, . „ r.'~ .. ~ °c: ~~ '\~ a i • MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING: FEBRUARY 9. 1999 APPLICANT: MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 ITEM NUMBER: 3 REQUEST: ANNEXATION OF 40.55 ACRES AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS REVIEWED REVIEWED ~~~ (~ b SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS w ~ l~ L n ,~ G.P/~ f v ,I C ~ SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: SEE ATTACHED LETTER FROM TOM 8~ SUE DAVIS All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. r ~ Y 33(~ ~~ ~ , . • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Mayor LEGAL DEPARTMENT ROBERT D. CORRIE A GOOCI P18Ce t0 LiVe (208) 884-4264 CITY OF MERIDIAN Council Members PUBLIC WORKS CHARLES ROUNTREE 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT r (208) 887-22I 1 GLENN BENTLEY MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 RON ANDERSON Phone (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT KEITH BIRD (208) 884-5533 MEMORANDUM: February 5, 1999 To: Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor & City Council REcE~~ From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer F E B - 5 1999 Re: Request for Annexation and Zoning to R-4 for 40.55 Acres CITY OF MERIDIAN by Meridian Joint School District No. 2 We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: 1. This application is for a parcel of land directly adjacent to the north boundary of the Hollister parcel that is also the subject of an annexation request. This application is being filed separately from the application filed by James & Karen Hollister, however these two applications are for contiguous parcels. The legal description submitted with the application for annexation appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian, and State Tax Commission. 2. Sanitary sewer serviceability to this site is questionable since this parcel is on the fringe of the service area of existing mains. Applicants engineer will need to verify the feasibility of service. 4. Water service to this parcel could be extended from the existing main located in Locust Grove Road. 5. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing or adjacent to the property shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 6. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. Joint School Dist No.2.AZ.doc ** TX CONFIRMA~ REPORT ** CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 12 04/01 16 22 1 208 336 3680 Memo AS OF APR 01 "35 16 23 PAGE. 01 MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD#S STATUS EC--S 01'41" 005 207 OK T0. via y i h s~(~ss F~ #. 33~ - 3(~~D Frond City Clerk's Office Date: 1 Re: ~'I`IYlOJ1~_Q ~~SY11Y?G_ ~i).4 A'(,r~S # ~~ _ 4Q-1 ~7S Please find endosed a copy of the Recommendation to the City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commssion on the above n?ferenoed applicatio Please note this matter will be heard before the City Council on the ~ day of 1999. The Ciiy Councl request that you be prepared at the hearing to specifically address the Recommendations ofthe Planning and Zoning Commission. If you disagree with those recommendations, please state which ones and the reasons. If you propose any additional recommendations, conditions, etc., please prepare your recommendations in writing so you play submit the same to the City Council at the hearing. The Councl appreciates your attention to this request. It will assure that the Councl has the benefit of understanding your position in this matter and it will help limit the need for testimony. ,. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE A Good Place to Live Co~~~~l Members CITY ®F MERIDIAN CHARLES ROUNTREE 33 EAST IDAHO GLENN BENTL)~YjrcE, TTTT"~T~ MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 RON ANDERSOII~~`'.~/ ~~` `~' -LL~jLJ Phone (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 KEITH BIRD ~ A ~ ~ ~ 1999 City of Meridian City Clerk Office LEGAL DEPARTMENT t2os) sa4-a26d PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: February 2, 1999 'TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 5, 1999 HEARING DATE: February 9, 1999 ,FILE NUMBER: AZ-98-105 REQUEST: ANNEXATION ~ ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY: ~ MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: East side of Locust Grove Road. between Ustick and McMillan Road lust North of Summerfield Sub TAMMY DE WEERD P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MARK NELSON, P/Z BYRON SMITH, P/Z KEITH BORUP, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT ~OLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORN EY _CITY ENGINEER _CITY PLANNER CITY FILES MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) IDAHO TRANSPORTATIO DEPARTMENT ADA COUNTY (ANN N) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~ ,~ • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE A Good Place to Live o.~ iIM m rc CITY OF MERIDIAN CHARLES ROUNTREE 33 EAST IDAHO GLENN BENTLEY MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 RON ANDERSON Phone (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 KEITH BIRD LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 884--4264 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT ~zos> ss~-2zI t PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208)884-5533 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: February 2, 1999 TRANSMITTAL DATE:- January 5, 1999 HEARING DATE: February 9, 1999 FILE NUMBER: AZ-98-105 REQUEST; ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY: ~ MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: East side of Locust Grove Road, between Ustick and McMillan Road iust North of Summerfield Sub TAMMY DE WEERD P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) MARK NELSON, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT BYRON SMITH, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION KEITH BORUP, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RON ANDERSON, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT} _KEITH BIRD, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) GLENN BENTLEY, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) SEWER DEPARTMENT IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ^BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT ~ ADA COUNTY (ANNEXATION) r+ / / _ ~ n YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: r `'I CITY ATTORNEY i CITYENGINEER _CITYPLANNER /Y/.er~~«.,/ ~2r [.viW /lJof h~u¢ ~- -CITY FILES rQhp b (.e.,~ 4~,` t6.._ *~i S ,~jW/vQ X q-'{,i 6 ~~ ~~-~a1 T-e JAN 1 1 1999 CITY OF ~RIDIA1v Xl~~ / ~ _ • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE ' A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT o ~n it M m rs CITY ®F MERIDIAN t~08j 881-t~6-t PUBLIC WORKS CHARLES ROUNTREE 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT GLENN BENTLEY MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ~~~~e ~ ~~ tzos> say-z2 t I RON ANDERSON Phone (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-48131 PLANNING AND ZONING KEITH BIRD A ~ O cc n a 1J 9~ A ~ y l gg pg 533 '4'~r~an Citv 4'rate; Sl+perinterxient TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by:_ February 2, 1999 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 5. 1999 HEARING DATE:_February 9, 1999 FILE NUMBER: AZ-98-105 REQUEST: ANNEXATION ~ ZONING OF 40.55 ACRES BY: ~ MERIDIAN JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: East side of Locust Grove Road. between ~ Ustick and McMillan Road iust North of Summerfield Sub _ TAMMY DE WEERD P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) MARK NELSON, P/Z BYRON SMITH, P2 +KEITH BORUP, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C KEITH BIRD, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT -CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER -CITY PLANNER CITY FILES ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8 FINAL) IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ADA COUNTY (ANNEXATION) YOUFj,CONCISE REMAR ,~ /~ REcErvED JAN 1 1 1999 CITY OF MERIDIAN cENTRA~ CE L DISTRICT HEALTH, DEPAR ENT •• DISTRICT EnvironmentalYHealth Division 'It H SALT H ~ Ret"o Boise DEPARTMENT ^ Eagle a Rezone # ~ ^ Garden City /Meridian Conditional Use # ^ Kuna Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ~/ ~ " ~.,~ ^ ACZ /`~EX.Ai i~h G1~G~ ~h~M 9 ~C~ _.S.SGtc . / /.e~i~1iri iy-a~i'° ~/~iooO ~Uy~~ ' ~~- ; I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ~,EcEI-~D 1) ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. .) A N 1 4 1999 ~ ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use. must be provided before we can commen~oti ~~ sfP~~~s~~lan ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5... Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ or bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ` ^ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well . a ^ interim sewage ^ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ .community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ^ central water a ^ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ I I. v This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other ' considerations indicate approval. ^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage'system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ,[~ I4. ~..~/1/TfYf ~-eG/-(G' /~//l~ ,l7~..PGI~ ~ ~2 /Jl.'~~~ Date: l l lj / ~ f Reviewed By: 5 , CDHD 10/91 rcb, n:. //9> ~. Review Sheet s .. ~._..w .. o.^.GANIZED 1904 City of Meridian City Clerk Office p ~ ~ ~. / ~[ 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 13 January 1999 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Will Berg, City Clerk SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Annexation and'Zoning of 40.55 Acres for Meridian Joint School District No. 2 Dear Commissioners: The Nampa & Meridian Imgation District has no comment on the above referenced application as it is out of our District. Sincerely, Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT BH: dln cc: File -Shop `~ File -Office Water Superintendent t ~. b,:" APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 • {.~ January 25, 1999 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Conunissioner: We would like to comment on the proposed two zoning change requests for James and Karen Hollister and tbe Meridian Joint School District #2 properties located in the vicinity of Locust Grose and Ustick Road (See attached map). We are not opposed to the zoning changes provided a 9 foot chain-link fence is listed as a requirement for the zoning change and installed the entire distance between our land and the two subject parcels. We would require the fence to be built prior to any type of construction of utilities, sewer, water, roads or any such building begins: We are requesting this additional requirement since we have encountered a number of problems with previous developments bordering our property which we have owned and operated for the past 32 years. When the last phase of the Summerfield subdivision was under construction we requested achain- link fence be constructed between the subdivision and our property. Based upon the developers request, the Meridian Planning and Zoning allowed a 6 foot wooden cedar fence. Even with this wooden fence we have encountered many difficulties with trash from builders, landscapers, and residents. This type of barrier allows the wind to blow the debris over and onto our property. We have requested a 9 fL chain link fence since it will allow the air to flow through but keep the trash on their property. With the previous development we were forced to pickup trash at least once a week for the past three years. We do not feel it is our responsibility to pickup all the trash that is generated by a constnzction project of this size nor tbe Long term residents. In addition we continue to raise crops for our dairy on the property bordering the proposed construction site. These crops aze harvested and consumed by our dairy cows; therefore, when trash is present in the feed it can cause potential halm to the livestock. We have made numerous attempts to resolve the existing trash issues with the City of Meridian and Mayor Bob Come without any success; therefore, we feel that it is time to be proactive with future developments surrounding our properly. In an effort to avoid the same issues with that of Summe~eld, we ask that a 9 foot chain link fence be part of the requirements for the zoning change on the above mentioned future developments. If you have any questions, please contact us at 887-2055.. Sincerely, Tom and Sue Davis 2740 East Ustick Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 _,._. .,. ,:, F K ~_ ~ r r _ -~` ~ e ,anr~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ t • ~:~ ~ 3 ~~~ ~ try' '~,.,. ,. ~ S~ , e t ~ ..., , ~` ... , n,,, e.?'~ :r-+~.,. • t , j~~~ ° ` ., ~3,, ,~. ~ *,:, ~#. t. ~ -yBt ',:i'' ~`"s gas- _y,~ ~"~' `r~ f ~z~ ~~ 1E ~as._ ~..~.`~~~ ~ ~ -,~, ~•~•i7' -'~'~ ^"'~` _ ~sa~ ~. sT.. 2~ ~ ~ a ti:'r~ mot., ~- -~;s r I "~_ '` x -icy } s 4a ~#' ~`~~ ~,43 .,,-^~ ~ ~ ~ * x~- s,. - C Y ~. •.4,1 ¢ e _. _ - _ '~ ex;,` . _ -:---' - ~~~ ~" ' i ~ ~ ja~~j~~~~ ~ijs ds: ~& dk b '~~ ~.` _ ~ - - r~° a~~x„^ ~~1. , i r~~ v~ /~~ t, Y ~-L' ~g 1 ,~s" ~ ~4 ~,«f k. ~~ ~ Iyx"^ a3+ _ .. a~ ~ ~ ~ ; „ ,. ~.y?4 ~t ~- ~. i~~ "3` tt f-ry ~ 'v°"Z~gC*. ~Re,,, "~-s•'1r: . ~ ~ .. -. . _ ~ _~~~ -~ .. r~ ::ter _ °~ ~.~ ~ ', ': ~ ~~ ~ ' ~ ,~~ ~ ~~S .. ~y~ ~ ~a~ ~~;a J ^T^'j j^ . t ~"~ ~ ~-,~ ~~` ,~ ask ~ ~~ f~t _~.` :r , / v ,,': ,.. ONN~~O.-0~~~~~1~~ :1._ ~ ~ __ I `\- i ..~~\ _~ ° u --- - .~ i i i /.' '\ -' .~ ~ ~ N ~l ' _ h ~ N / O I m ~" `\ \r ,, ` ~ ~ ~~ , O` ~ \ rn .I~ =' ~ D I- J J ~~~ ~ _____ N. SUMMtR51DE WY_ r---~---~~, ~~;- N (r1 ' w ~/ ~ ~U n N ~ ~~ ~o ~ ~ ~ V ~/ m ~~ jam` N 1 LL ~ ~"~ 1 .V ^) y R 1 ` ~; O v - - e: l m 4 ~' T N (f ~ ~L~ U 77 =~F~RY. AV. ~ i~ '~ m ? ~ ~ ;. ___.: m I =.~ '`_ _ l`3~ Y!Y ~ ~'~ f;F ~ ~ ~ -. -~ ~- ~ _ :fir .. -1 .~ ~ o ~, a ; .~ z ~ .~_ 4 ~~~~ C~ ~ -`,~ Q ~ ~ ~_. 1 S. a ~_ '~ r ~~ r- ; .r, L ~i l~ V~~ p`~, ~~ ~~V`` O~ ~ ~ a~..~ ~_ .~ a ~. O ,,~ +--~ ~ Cl, O ~ Cl, a+ 0 ~ ~ U ~ •~ U U G1~.~ ~ .~ ~ ~ A, Q 'C ~ ~ N N 0 ~ .o ~ U +~' ~ ~ ~ ~ w O ~n y ~ ; U ;.~ O O ~ .~ ~ • ~ ..--i 3 a ~ ~ i i.. O ~ .n o M N ~, ~ ~ O - ~; ..., a~ a air ~~ U T ~ -d -:~. o~: r U. . . ~' ° . Q y ~ ~ ~ ° ` tin"~,. ~ G p O ~ ° ~ . U ~ ~ ~ r .~. ~ p ~ .= N ~ . g ".r 3 u• o ~ . o ~;~" ~ e ~ a ~~~E -~ U '"^~~~'i. ~: ~~ N yNj O- ~ UfM c~. ~ O ~ ''' ~ ~ " ~'` ~' A. Cd O N V ~ Q~ U -~ y5..," C ~ ~ y ~ f'. 0 ^ '1 c~ 0„ i ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ U 4~g0 .b '~ I~ .~ ~'O ,~~ O ~ ~!~~~ •~ ~~ 11~bn .'~ ~ k~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~T~ O ' ~ ~.D o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y p 3 0 w ~ b 3 ~' U N a .~ Cl. Q ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ v~ U ~ p O ~ ~ O O U ~ p U a ~ ° ~ .~ an . . ~ .. V] M b ~. t~ ~'~~~ ~' o ~ ~ ~ a~ GO . ~ ~ j, ~~. ~ W ~ ~~ ~~ --~ ~ OI ~ >i.~ ~ ~O . ~_ .a ~ ..~ a~ '~~ U ~; O ,~ , ~ .. ~. ~ a.~ .., ~ a ~" ~; ~ ~ cr • "" O O ~ ~ W O ~ .~ o '',.. t. o r , ~ ~ ~ U . 'C3 ~ y ~ ~ ~ bA :. ~ _ A ~ ~ 'c~ ~ ~ O ~ +-~ r" ~ ~"" ~' ~ ~ `-' ~ ai O a a ~ ~ ~ F i ~ ~, U ~n N d 'C1 ' '~ U a3 C ~ ~® cd ~ v-, v~ • ~ ~ _ c w :~ ~ ~ o~~'~ ~ `~ ° ~ ~ o'er ~ `an .. ~ - ~~ e ~ C ~ ti ~ . ~ L ~ .~ ~,~ .ma ~ "1 yam _ ~ • y~,,,~ 9 ~y yy ~V ~ y . y ~.I o U .~ N ~ U a„ ~+• b ' T ~ Q~ U .fir cd ~ ~ `n ~ ~ ~.-~ ~ " .a O 3 ~°_ m h ~ ~ o ~ U~ ~ ~ '„ . .-. ~,v W ~ bA.~ ~ D" ~ ~ ~ ~ bA W N .. U.. N , ~ : ~ ~,. ,.. ~.. ~ N •~ . ~ O e '~ . 0 ' . O ~' ~. U" O ~ ~ w,. U k ~ r~ ~ O .b '~ : a~ r' O 4 p (~ ~ ._+ O~ L"~. ~ y L Cad. , N ~ ~ ~ O a+ w, p ry ~ , O 4 .~r~f ~ .U U~ O` ~. ~ O ~ aA O•.~.„~ oC~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q "'~ ~ '~ ~ ~ o L ~ ' a. ~ U L . UC% ~ p" ~ +~'+ ~ ~ O ~ ~ .C . y O ~ ,.. € N 3 ~ .~ t'". tis~ ~ a z.~~ U ~ s.,y ;? ~..j r ~ o .ti ~ ~ ._~ ~ ~a `~ ,~ r ~' Gl: N N c~ y, .~, U O • • a.~ ~ vy O ~ lr ~4 ~ Y.. - 1-H 1""1 -~y ~~ .. -. E O ...~ U O a N ~ a? ~~ N b ~ .. ~ ~ a b a ~ o ~ ~ U _ U O ~ '+•+ '+.+ ° ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ U ~ a ~ O -d a> O ... ~ ~ ~ ~~ , z= ~ !!~.:.~ . s.. wy',~ M W` ~• a _ ~ ~ ~»~ ~~,U ~.,. ~j vi O ~ y >' Uy Q t Q O'LS... 4 ~ O, yU ~.v~i G) ~ ~ N~~ ui n.~.~ C~~' ` ~ i .~ w ~~r0 ~ y~ ~ n y ° . ~ ,.,.,, U c~ ~ ~ .~ y ~ y ~ . ai .~ ~ w , 0.1 .~, '"'~ ~ p,'O • aS ~ G) ~ { O y ~ a~ , bA ~ ~~ ~c~i"~ ~ ~'~n~'~ ~ ~a~i,Q ~ ~~; °S ~~~o ,,°` ~`~ 1~.~:~a`i ~~ o a~i o ~U ~ ~y,~'~ ,~ t~ ~, ~ p obi ° ~ .n ~ ,~ v1 r.. s . v ~' a> ~', ~ oo °' ~ ~ ~ O ~ '~ ~ ~0: '~, - ".~ C a~ ,,,,~ g ~ °' ~ ~: brD. 'O t0 ~ f3. N O a~ O` y c~ .+. ~ •5 M' c~ ~ ~ ~`.d,. (,~ ~ W ~ LLB QS""7 c~ ~~ y s: ~ y h.,~ Q'" O ~ .~ y s.,~ C ~ ~ ~~ 'C C [-. U ~_.-r 1' ~i ~ ~'O. ~ Q N ,O ~ ~ cC .. +'..~ ~+ M _~t., ,7 eC m ctY ~ _ +r .~'' k ~ __ ~ - " ~..~_ ~o~=_ _~ _ ~_ 1 ~ 1- -± I ~~~~-I ! ,- ~-= ~~:~,:T.- i-~~-=,rjzo ~3 ~~ 7 ;i'9 :~~ ~ y:`! 3 i S~ ~ o Y ~ ~ ~. ~.~ ~°°.~ .D '-' ai ¢' ~. p GU ~ ~. Cl. ~ ,'C3 O~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ U . ~1 ~ T ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ a..° ° ~ ..r ~ U ~ v ~ ;° ,~ ~~ ~~~~ ^ N N. a Y s q.: i' • o- 0 ~~ o . ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i a~ "C „~ ~ .U G' N ~ ~ U ~. O ~ ~ ~ ~. ° ~ ~~ .3 ~ ~: + oA o ~ s~ 0 ~ ~ O 'M ~ N V] 9N ~~y° ~~ ~: ~ ,. ~oA ~, ° 6 0 .._, ~~ ' ~~~o ~~ ~ ~' 1~~pq~ 'Ly N '~ G ~ ~~ ~ r" C ..jam i I ~ ~' " A ° ~ o •° ~:~ ~~ U ~'~ 1 ti ~! tr '~ tT. U ~ .~.. ~ ~ "'Cy O ~ ,~ cn" ~ Q O O ~ .~ O ~ ~ U s,,,, ~ bq 't7 4-. ~ _ 3 ~ ~ o _~ '3 ~ cvo ~ ~ o ~ 0 Y ~-bQ_a°i ~ o ~: oAo ~ o a~, `" ° ~ ° ° N ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ I . _~ ,r 1 ~ ~ ° 3 ~ L Ct~ ~ , ~ ° 0 ~y ~ Cd•- ~9 `, ~°~ ' ~ O ~, . ~ o ~ ~ ft :~' b ~ a~ a~ ~ ~ .~ , own ~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ ,~ ?~ + ~ o ai a~ ,~ y ~ , ~ ~ _ sC7 Oji'L7 ~ O ~ +t ~ .N ,~ ~ ,~, GL .~ cd b cd -O '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •. ~ . ~ ~i ~ ~ : C]: ~ yam ~ ~' ° ti O O ~ ~ ~ O ,, '' y b0~ 'b ~ ~ ~ I ~ U ~ ~ ..-, 7 ~ v.. I t U~ t ,~ v~ , ~ cn O p ~ ~ O N `n ` U . O ~ ~ N y ~ ~'cd ~ ~ r' . ~ .~ ~ ~ . CL E N ~~'„ O 4-. ~~ ~... '~ ~O ~ p ,'1 ' .~ o ~ ~ ~ W ~ Y ~ °ob ~ ~ ~ ., ~ .-r ~ U] M ~ . M ((!v^^^^^^! JJ ~ ~ ° ~ fff ~ Y-1 N N ti ..-~ ~ ~.. cC ~. V y vY ~ ~ .... N ~ O O ~ w O w -p O O ccS U rn .~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ " O O Y ~ .v O ~ a~ ~• ~ ~ ~ bA O 'b N ?, ~ cd ~ y O >- '-~-+ by +.' O. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ Q , ~ ~ , O ~ ~~ bA ~ ~, ~ .~ o a~ , x ° ~ a, ~ ° ~ N Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ > ~ ~• V w p ---~ y ;,~ T O ~ -~ C~ n . o m, ~ ° ~ ~~ ~~ a ~ 3 ~ o ~ ~, W ~ bA ~ cn ~ OQ" ~ ~ ~ bA W N _: ~~ ' w o. cc . ~ S O O ~ _ .~ N r ~ N ~ . ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ V . r ~ ..-.e .-. ~ b ' ~ ~ O ~ U s.. -b ~ v- cs v~ ; ~ o ~ -rs ~ ~ • U O ' -o c a, d. L O U , a cif C ~ ~ ~, ,.. ~.. . O L U C O d D O U N O" O, v~ ~ ~.--~+-'b 0 c ~ H . ~ ~ ~~ C1. c~ C ~.-... a' U ~ .. ^., y v~ cd O y ~' O O .. ~ ~ O p• ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .O •~ ~ V O b OU O ~ ~ ~ ~:. ~ t. N ' '.° p~ ° ~ d ° ~+ ~ z~~ ° ~ nil a, ' ,,~. ''~, ,~° x -o ~ U t1• ~ c~ t... ti.. `~ O ~ ~ a~ ~ U bA ~ r". .O ti~ a O ~ ~ w `~ O ~ U O p U C1. `~ ~ ~ E--{ 3 ~- e w tip. ~ i ~ ~.. - {,-~_°~ a ~ u ~ r k _-~: .." r .. , ~~ ~ y~~^~~•e~~ 4 v '~ i"* t,:r r~ -~~ ~ ~ `i ~ {.~~ 'xw# ~"3 .. 7~~ ~"; }~ y~s~a..• C7 e ~ ._ . ~ .a >a F,~., a '6. ~hy~ - r r ~ 3 am, r w ~~,1. r~. .1-= ~) r... y. x k l,.. ~ `~j ~yyw'.. r t q r• m ... ... :~ ~ ' k. .r. .. { '-pp - i ~ ~ a, } .- 4 A ~ s 3: ~ ~ ; ~ ;~ w -» ~ r ~~ t U ~~.ese,~s i' ,..0'~ ~, c/)~ -~O~ ,rO:~O',aO * £-ter ~ i ,.~... ;.:2> _~ ~~ ~.~ •--~ ~:~ i~d .e'_'V~~~ r N i..i ~ , ^ •~"• ~ ~ • ~'4•'' ~ ~ ~ F N^~..' .7 N - i-~ fi ~ ~ ,.'~ +~r, U L~ U 'O C N cd ' N v~ ~ O"~ O.` .b ~ ~ .~ cUd "~ ~ v~ '~.~ . ~ ` ~ cd ~ Y ~U ~O ~ i `~° ~-' EO a ~5~+°•N `w ~ ~ ~."'%. ~-.4.. 3 O^~~ ~•,~ cd ;~ Ytd ~- 2 y.~«.+ .~ 'O c3 ~ C A^. U c+-r•a">y O F ~ ~1, :~ "~" ~t,,,:+ C.", ~....• ~1~~ Q' pr~+' ~ _~r ~~ ~... a,.. ^~+ ~ ~ a .O O a~ ~ w .~ e 0-.a ~,,'C O r•V a ~Uy G)~~at~r O ~ •~ ~ "~ ~ ~ ~~; t i ~ ~+" ~ ..C s.. ~ ~ • v) ~ Y '' it b s >"+-+ 1 ~ • N +N-+ ~.' ~ ~' ~, bQ a ~v O N $+•~ ~ r>'. r ~ + ~ ~""' 'e.,*-~~ ed 'C3~ ~e""f t ~t3 ~ O •t•. O •" ,;,, ~: .O ~ ..V. O ~ Cd a.-.r pe~' .Ur ,~'~ ~~ N Y..r ti""` O~ f ~i-+ ~r O.F { ~..,,•O C'C' ¢,~ 3 y.f ~,w +;. ~A ! U ~ O O eU., .~_ J~" U, ~~ ~ ~*t0!~ ~± ..:. O•ws U~ ~ O4"p U ~, U ~' 0 ` `,' ''r ~. 1~'.1}*..•~"~ ~#. LL -` ~~ ~ s ~: ~ ~ ~«~' d~ ~ ~.+o: F~: a tel.. z ~~ ~ N ri M' _ ~d' y '"°~ Y' ,,,E .~ s.. c... _ 4j ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N C ' +~ r~mN ~" 'O ~ tom-, tom.,' T ~~, bD b U `l > ~ r ~ `~ F ~ ., t+- U O ~ O ~ s Q. ~ S~ ..~-.. ~ .O U .n U O cd tp0 ~' U .D „~, , N y ~ a ~~ ..+ ~ O a? s N ..O Q. t ~ ~: ~ O .- i :.^~ ~ >~, : ~ ~ ~ v~ : `N ~ '~ ~", bA ~ .30 y }•~..•, ~ ~ ~ O ~ by ~'°t,. <O y O :.O y~j'aa..+ > ,_^• 'b ~ , ,.~~ b U j•~ r•' ~ ~ T7 O ..O ..C ~ 00 " cn •y ~ -C O .D `r' O CL ~ Ip,r U 4~ ~ U '` .. G .~ --~ `~' ~ ^' O t~ u: ~ O" . U O ~ N . cn ~ ~ N ~, , O •.=.r U -bA CO v~ 3 ~. ti., S." O ,r ~»' cd• U :~ cU3 ~ RS •'d ~ ~ y V..-'~• ~w~ ~~ Cr .~ '~ 1y tit. bA .~ ..~-~ ~ •+''~ ~~ ~~b' N `9 CL > ~ _ N vpi O U v~ `,~ .~ ~ vNi -d • ~ a N p •~ 1},? ~ .~.+ >~ ~ L:. h • ~ -" ~U ~ ~ ~ C7.' ~ •O U ~ a0i . N .b v a) '~ ,t tG ?~ O 3 w [~. N ., U *. e .4,~, M ~t•r _ ~!1 _. «. ,- ,, . x. e ] #' !tip ~ ~ t ~ ~~ ~~ .. ~'v, ~>,•n c~U .~ oU ~ ~;,• ~,~ a> o ~; o ~~'~ 3 ~ C'°'Q 3W ~°~~ °'° ~ any o° ..o•...... o _ o0 0 4. -oca~ ~ •~ ° U ~ ~ ~• a~ ° ~ ~ N ~ ° ~ '~ p, a~"i ~s ~ .~ o ~ °' ~ ~' `~ .~ :~ o ~ aoi o ~ cOa ,~ ~ ~ -c a.c o ~ 'o ~° ~ no'd •~ ~ .c w ~ .~ ~'.~ °' v ~ ~ ~ ,; ~ .c o a~ ~' ° ~, o o R ° °~'•o ° > °'~ ~~ y ~ ~,a ~.0~'°Ay.:" claw p~ ~_~ ~,~`~ cccsi" ° °:b c'4: ~ a~ °J ~ v a~ o~ ~ o•yU.., ~... ~, ~ s..~ ~ bn ~. a ca .r ~ c a~ ~" 3 . ~ 'o o a~ ° o o ~-' w, ~ c 'd~rnC7•~0.~ p>jsV.yO.,'7~~.~UC~ V ~•..,.d•-. Oa~p N. yO.d c.~.~~ .Q~•.."..'O •G °'`~~°vio~-a.` •o~~po,~ ~.a~~~~~,~03~~0~~~...~a`'i¢3~•g, _ ,~2s.a.~~[ o '•~r...~yN a>.... a~ ~~O.COCO.~ NNw.d'C: ~'.~y;C. v~~~ I.~~![r~~v5 0 ° p.•O ti y ~ ~ ~ _ " ~ O .-, ~ ~ V .... ~ E,., v ~;.C ~ C .~.-9 V ~.. m ~ q O V .x sV, ~,, 5 rn a> c~ v~ ~.-~ a~ ° ~ ~ ~'°' ~~ ~ ° ~ ai oa n.c o c ~= o ~ ~ gF" ~'.~U;~ ~ o;~~U ~ «s~,N.~~W ~ ~U a .n. o 0 3 0 0. ~n.~ ~ ~... _ ,., y., .c V c ~ c 'S Gl v~ 3 ~ v v~ a I a ~ a~ ~ ~ <«., ,~ .a ~ ai V p U a~ ~ bD ~ ~ .~ a~ ~ 'O a~ ~ °~ °O~ ~ C ~~ A~ 'LLB ~,O V ~a~`~~ CS.~ VJ .o ~ .~ ~rx~ 3.~ c~ v~ v v, aaa~ ~ a ~. ~ 3 ~ c . a~ °o~a0.i°' ~•o •~v o~°'~a'a~oo°.x'°o~° .r o o •o y o ~ ~; .o a ~ ° ~ goo n.-c~.o~~~~ °y.~ tL: V 6y ~ ~.G M-gft~'fl C~ ~'~ ~ ~'/1 ~oa~~n~_ a•°i~b cb.o.~vc.~ ~~`.~~; o.~o ~~~oaai~''o`° ~ o ,~ ~cz. c ~ °0 3 r~ ;~ -o 0 ~1 ~:~•c3~3.~ ~'C d'q ,: z ~. ~ fy E ~ t c~ ~' N~ ~•~ '~ W ~°~.~ ~` .. ~ ~ a y w v ~ ~1 ~_ N J ~., ~ t N ~ ~~ i~ \ Iz '3 t 1m Z :m I~ :r m i C i z a :N a c a :z €v n Z O ` z n -_ _-__:0 G ~, -< _ ~ .. ~ ,, ~.. ~,g ~"r~,o o } o ~ ~ °ti..' ~ v o'a ¢.ig ~ ~ ~c3_°?:~. ~ c~ ° c'~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ y ~ ,wE. `° ~ ~, ~;~ ~ o ~ o.~c ~s o ~ o>~ a~ c~ ~ ~, ~ ° ~ ~-o to °~~,o ~''~ ?3 ~ ~ s ~ a°•o ~ ~ `°d c a aycc~ ~~ U ~ ~qy~~,,~o•''--F, ~.°~ ~ o ~ o °' o E~ d ~ ~w ~oh.c°b '~• •S 5 ~ °'~ ~ bn _ y •~ oZ.~:~.~ o °~ ~~ 3E-H '~ a C °'~ ~ '~ .~~ o ° ~ y > ~, a~ a ~ 'C ~ ~ do•~ o ~ .c envy ~ d .~.c .~^~ t°,a~ ~Os.•~~.., ~ U Ao.~~ N ~ ,~°y'in yecsas"a~ ° V C«.O Z w ~ vvVi ~~tn, V ~, V]tiO~y ~.,Q +~U. yap N~uim.O^~,~" C~ bA~ cC ~~ v*~v •~'fiio ~ a`~i~'~~ ~~ no ~ ~ ~'•.~ aa-poapi'bv1U~c~~°' H ~ ~~ o~, ~. O +~ ~, ~ ~ s: sV..~ ~' ~ :d V '~ •{~' V ono ~. • ~ ~ ~'.~, ~ ° ~ ~~" ., ~-. CL' ;~ ^~ L: N o-.-~ '~ ~ ~O ~ `~' b4 o o ~ a_ ~°\ a~ o a~ o c~ ~ .~~~!! ~ '~5 c~ c~ ~ ~/~ ~ •U^ 3 w"c7 a ~ ~ ~a ~ '~ ~ ~; 3~ '~ a ~ , ~ ~v ,,,, o. •ac~ o ~- ~ ~ . LJ" _ E_! U '~ w .~ ~ •J.a R. ° C ~ N Ci ~ ..w ~'M flS w .. .. +~' CJ"' M ~ .. C.~j fC t~l (C ~~ Q. a•+ .Li ~ ~ ~ ° .r f f .~. v E a a 0 C e t m ~~ .. / 17d n G ~2D~ 11 I/ r-~n, . ~ a 1, ,T21/ ~d n~~.~ ~ / -~C~~~`~G~ ;~ , Y ~, ~? 1 .; I i y J .' 3 3 3 k ~ I ~_~ `~ 6 1 2 5 .5 ly Z 3 ~ 7~ Ni,~ -- ~t ( S 1 2~ , -- I ~I 1 I - - - / z . . Sa. t3 WID '.lS 11 14 zo . _y1m~ ~ ~. °=v I ,~, - .. 2; $ b ~.. ~ 7 3N4f ,3y 33 `' ND y 7 3 ;~ - - ~ , I $ s. , l , 2. ~ 2 N`.3 ' I ~ I i, - I -' - ~z = ~$° 52 ;~`~9 L(a I .y(o, l09. 62 y~ ~H , N2 H)~ ~4~ ~l0' u7 !~3= ~y 13~ ~ 32 28 24 33 3$' 15~ ~~~/~ 53~~ 43: 37~ 38° 33 Y~~ y0 ~ S l9 ~ ~9^ 3o ~ yy 31 Nl , 35~ 45 ` !~ ~ ~ 15 ID 7 L2~ 6~ Ly ;8'S` '15' :!!~ '$ ~9' 7~ l0~ `j, - r `L - ~ ", ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~~i ! ~ 9 .~', L3 /0 7 ` ~G~~ j~ ` rs ` _ _ .y ,~2j ..~ 4 ,. - ~ ~ ~ - = ~ 3 ~ '40 ~ 3z 3y, 49 I YD N9' soi 53 ~d / ~ ~ , r ,~ ~~ , K~ r n F ryp; !! !. ~ 1i 2 =3,+/SI w it i ~3 . //, lo.I IZ tq ~ 7 i3 13'~ 13~ 5j ~ ' - ~ ~ _ ~ ql -' / = -_~ -f 1 ~. / - /Z 5 ll ~ I2 2 !2( ID S2 i - ~ ~2 / -.'`i -I'! '- '3' I = ,, L - . L La ' ~ .l s S3 ~ 13: ~ z5 ~~25"; 32 z9 zD ~2G ~.3 3z 3l~' d~G y~f ;~3y~ 37~ -- f33 ~~ ! 2 ; i .l ~ ? ~ sz ~ sy ~{ ly z3' 18 ila ~i%~~' ~H' '11 l9 ~~t21~ it 15 ~19' '13. %S ,- ~ ~ ~.1 ~ < 2 3 -- ~ 2 ~ SS , - - 2 I 1 - ! ~ / ~ °iS' { i2 = t2~ 12 9 ~ 13 . ~9 ~ I Y 412 ~~i _~ . ~~ - ~ .~ ~ ~ ) l 2 `l S(o _ 1 29 ~ 37. S2'' 3!0 ~ 3l0 2!0 ~ i 27: ~ 5G 1 ~ . k' S, ~Z,' ~ -5 /..~ /; . ! ~ - 3 I / S / (~ S S7 .N 7, 37 y 9 ' S7 52~ I /' S3 `i 1 E f ~$ ,l ~ 3 y Z ~ l .5~8' . S!o `1q~ SY;SI` 3,1A 39 3~( `1~' 2' 3 !~~~3 ",l• { ,5~ ~5" 19 l8 z~ ~2 2(~ IS 24~ 22 59 19' zS .za(za 2~ ,2.3. !S~ ..~i9 ~ ,=7, i5: ~15~~,$,i-S ~$ 17£ ~o _~ s ~y.- 8 ~f s ~ 8 ~0 2 2 y ~ L ~ 1 y s Loo ,.- ~ _ - I!~- t ~ - ~/ . t-t ~/ { Z / ( ~1 ' - ~ - ~ Gl to ~ Cv 8, ~ ~/ Z'7 lo.' 1r71 ~3 ~~ n, y` S ~~~2 , 3 i3, '~ z2 ; 1, _,L - ; I 3 2 1 !oZ G2 g9 81 !'qo 99 8113 75 ~ lOZ ~-, 1J i ~. i - i / ~ - 4`l -3 .l9 i~ ~ zz; r9 ~o , l2 /l ~3 s ~ -2 ~ ~ ~ 9 s Loa 7 it ~ Viz; to ~ y_ s~ .-ia !~ , / , - - ~ 2 ~ 3 3 ~ y HO yl 33 ~ K 2 ~ ~ 3~N~ 2G' SLON -' :~. i 2 (r`N 1 i ? ~3 - ;S .~ 2 ~- ~ s ~3 ~ 3 1 !e5 77 9S 8Go ' 83 7!0 7y 108 /05 Z2` 23;n2! ~ (`$s, 2H 2.1.~_ 3.3 .G -. ~ 1 ~ - ~ ~ / - ~ 3 2 ~,G (05 5g ~3 ~Gl I {7b°~y5 (vG ldG y3~ 50i551.N/o 53 ~ Gy ~lo~ .7 8 4 , _: /8 /0 .: 12 $ /S 13 G7 73 $3 LB.i 80 _ $o; ~SI~ ~ /Oy lD7 12 ~ .~ -21v~25,1 18 19 ~ 21o gyp., i33 8 _ 4 _ _l. _ 3 2 3 In 2 3 G~f l y r~.5 , l l S~ l1 ~l S 24= .17 f D~ 7 .~~ 1 ~ ~ -~ i ;r ~~ ~ -'- - ~-- 8 12 /a q y L3 9 ~ ~9 ,r~ h¢ z i,i ~l~~ j ' , 10:9 ;~ ~~ ¢,~ Y~~ ~'3. ~O 3+l' ~ ~-9 53 3/0 37 ~ 35 N7 70 - {;~~ ~ 1 ~ 'I ,~~~., //U ~.,~ ~~`- ~~+~ p ~ ~~. 'I ~7_, '9 ` lIf 8 (v 13 l2 71 ` g2. Iz9° 11z 118 Iz~` /33 IDZ> 1// ~ .,r ~._~ .Y(2 ~ 2 __y.:. .lo.; ~2 .3 S, ~ 54 1~. 72 S7 Ia2 8,~. L?b 109 Lao :. /33~ ll2 ~ ~ } };,~ ~,~ , ¢~:_. 3 9 . S :~, S (o O 2 13. 73 . ~~' z0 21 ~ 23 I S~ 22 13~ l 3 4 ~ ~ ~ ' ,~- . el Y -/ ~ 1! ~ ' 9.~ .~ 9. V' 3 r/.i ~ ~~ ; L `Iq , . '.. ,.~-7` }~i `/'( i. !~ ~ i ~ ~~ ~ O eIV~ //"~! L~~+~ ,~. Y ,. y //s ~' .Y 1.. j~e{ ~P~', 51.E a. 7 y ~ ~~~ y rL/ s' s s -~~ a iyl q is i 2 f 7s ~y , ~. :~ 2 ~ ~ t , ~ _ _ ~. .~ ./ 1 S ' ~: .~. - I f. . / / k -Lp,N' i }`$+ ~ ~. ~ ib ,pyy ~ ~~' z ~C ell. ,is ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ,'fX .1 t~ _ _ ~ _ . ~ ? 7 ~ ~n ~ ° ~ 3 !_ l, = ~ o !17 3 _8 = ; 3 ;9 ~ .~ ~ - 9 ' 7 ~ _ ~ . , r~ 7 ~ , - ~ ~-' ~/ `; / :3 t 2 2 , 'll, d lP ~ = ~ , ~~~ ~ _l y ;17 rL 3 ~/ ~ y~_: ' ~ _ ~ ~ ~. Try ~ --- ~ ! i 1 . 3, ! { - 2, 119 ~3: 9 ~ ~ 7 3; 2_k (o . ' I f ~ ; - - ~ - -- -- - - - 7~ - ~ - ~ ! / ~ 3 1 2 2 //~ lP 1 y i ly `17 , 13 /~f ._;_ ~ -~ ~ ~ } Try ~ ~ l I I +'3 I - Z Il9 3 9 iz7 3~ 2 ~_- ~ _ -_. _ ~ 11 f ', ~ SQ, / ! /; -{2= • ~. - _ /201 3 7;9.~ ~. 3 ;S_ ~ ~ , ,~ ., • ~ a • e i j t - - .t 4w < 0 ~~ a ., '4' ^ .. 3 . ' Q l *~ t W a ~ ~ • s`: ~. f f: 3 f . ~ 3 f ~ _ It J 6; ~ ` .. ~ r ~ '~ a~ ,fl of . ~'~w, oo ;~ ., .~ ~ ,~, • ~ ° '~ ~ a~ ~ 3 .~ . ' ~ ~= ~ l ' 'J '' 'b ~ s~ ay ~ --~ ~ - ~ ., ~. ~ ~ ~ a~ '+-, • a •-; ~ ~ ~ o = o cn a~ a.> ~. ~ U y .~ O y ~ ~~ O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ '-' ~ w0 Q ~ t ~' O cd > O b O~ ~n C O O, O O O ~ U b0 O ~ ~ Y - 3 O ~ U ~ ~ a Q ~ . ~ d a ~ U E- cn ~ ~ v' O .' ~ w -d °~'~ 3 ~ ' ~ ' O w U U a~ ~ O b V U ~ ~ a.> v~ vi ~. Q. ~ , E- • . ;, ~ . ~,.. _. - ~„~ ~ ~rj_ M M . M Q U ~~ a -o E ~ ~ ~ .° j ~ .~ " z' f oo , ~ ~1 ~ . ~ > o c ~, a~ ~ a~ c ~ ~ ~ a~ o ~ ~o ' ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ U -O v1 • bA cd ~ ~ O ,~ ~ " ~ H I " ~ ~ O ~ Y ~ ~ ~ O C~ O cd ~ ~ S'r L s... ` ~' ~ ~ p CC _ b t 3 '~n ~ ~ cd cd 'b bA ~ t ~ H t. dA , ~ ..~ N ,,..~ U .~ v~ o~ O O U U ~ ~ o _ O ~ o ^. y b-b ~ .~ cn 'C .E 3cr~ ~ ~ O ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ Q -v~c~ ~ O ~ ~ 's., ~ ~,, ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~• M ~ N'1 ~ ~ ~ 1 M ~ M M" M M M " ~ a 3r :,. .. _ _ e. .,.. ._ .. ,. - r ., .. Y _.:__~. ~ ffi ._ - ----- n- _ .. .. ... ;- .. m ,~_ 0 0 ~.= ~ o0 0 ,~ pA -~ .b w a . a ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ 0. ~ ~ .-. a v- ~. a.+ ' ~ A > . .~~ ~ • ~ ~ [n '> O ~ C ~~rr G [.y ` i~.. ~ ~ ~ ~V" b cY~/f '~~5,,,," a~ ' ~ Pte. ~ ~,,, .O O ~. ~ ~ ~ cd ~ ~ •~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ L1~ ,~ C~ cd ~ ~ J O b o ~ ~ a~ a ~ o ~ b ~ ~ .~ • ~•~ ~ ;. ~ ~ a.~ o ;- ~ ~~- ox. x u ~ cn ~ Q :g ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ •o ° -L1 y a~> U ~ `~" o ~ a.'c;~ o ' • .~ °' :~ ;~ ~ ~.. o o, ~ •~ n ~ ~ ~ .ma ~ ~ 'o ~, .~ ~~y ' ~ ~~c ~ ~ O ~-~ of ~ ,~ n.~ O ; ~ • > ~,~ ~.. ..C. . ~ . G ° L ~ ~ ~,,, ~ r,.., ~ ~ . O ~ ..., O ~.. -~ /~ _ ~ '' ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ w .~ ~ cv ~ ~ •~ >, ~ c ~ O Q" : d ~ ~ ~ F-' ~ U ' i. ~' cad L. c d ~ ~ N cd >, - f ~ _ Q. ~ O ~. a~ Cd ~ ~~ ~ H ~ L. ~ , .U b .~ U O as N : v O O • 4- z7 ~ ~, a v ~ ~ c,~ a~ ~ ~ . ~ Q' y~ Rs c , ~ .~ .~ >, p ,., ,~ " a~i ~ V .~ ~ O N ~ (~ ~ N i C ~ c F+r pQ ~ ~ p ~ ~ 'D i W to ~ ~ w a. o ~ ~ ~ .: ~ ° O . a~ w ~ .~ .°? ~ S ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ° • ~ U a~ o > G a~ Ca . ~ ~ a~ ° z „~ N .~ ~ 'NO ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ a b d" ~ ~ ~ ~ i 0 ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ cd ~ ~ ~ • U s'~ ~ N ~ ~ ~' . ~' ~ ~ _ ai ~ ~ ~ 'b,. .. .--: > O .'p-' Fem.. 'a~ ,~ ~ ~+-~ '., ~ ~ N ~ ~". ~ Q~j ~, r a, 4 t ~..- O ~o ~~ G, ,.C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 ~,.~ ti~ ° ~~' a E~ a~ E d ~~~ w O ppOfv~ "' U U 'b .C ~f~~'~4 ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ •~ ~.w 'C7 ow, o ~ ~ > a~i o°a ^~a~i~b ~~ ~ w ~ 3 ~ _ O ~ O C1. G. ~ .b ~ y~ ,`~., a ~, w a`"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ci d ° ~ cd ? ~ ~ ~ c ~~ ~ ~ c3 ~n .~ ...~ ,i,~ w d. ~ O . c a c . ~- ~ ~ _ i ~ O °? :~ ~ p ~ c + T cd o C ~ `~ 3 L i ~ ' ~ °~ ~ o ~ ~ • ~ °' `E ~ ~~ '~-d w ba ~ :° ° ~ e ~" ~ . N p ~ ~ O y O pap ,~ o >,# ~ ~ U a~ > >, -~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ -d. ar `~ ?, ~ C ~ > N >, ~ ~ cd w ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O O -i .~._ . r ~, k ., '.a - - ~. .. ' s , • C"r "Cy >> ' • ~ ~. N '~~., cd .~. N .... O ~ r-, V~ .sa -0 U O N N • , a. O -d ~j ~ > ~ ai C7 • ~ o ~ o ~ ° w w ~ '° C7 3 ~ 3 I w C~ l.r > ~ 4"~ •1d -~ y Cam.. ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ U ~~ L U U .~ o .: ~ • U ~ ~ ~_ ~ o ~ -b 3 'macro `~ A.. W o ~ °° = ~ °° ar .~ ~ x Q ~ ~ > ~ ~ -c ~ ~ o ~o o ~ 3 K 3 ~ ~ L ~ ~~ ~ ' U U U y U O .r U W +~ y~ cn ~ ~e ~ ~ u o c > f~ a. ~ - 7 ri ~;. ~ r O b O F ^1 ~ F-' ~ ~ I ~_ > ~ U ~ ~... Lr N ~ N cd U ~ # b ~ vii" i..,, ~N U ~ r~ ~ ~" ,~ U ~• ~ . ~ U .a O O O ! N ..+ .~ chi U +U+~-1 :~ " ..Uj TJ .U.. 5 Ocd 5 c~~y U O U N .may U cS t~ b~A.~ IGA-' CO U W •~ ~ .N U W ts0 ~.. N ~ •~ Q.~ Q «Y ^~ Q:~ Q 0 vUi Q O Q O vUi Q¢ Q O Q U ~ O NLt+Q Nw,~ !N„~ N Wa N W N~,R~. N~ N W N O' N~OU . fM ~ ~ N a :'O t. cam, . ~ , ~ .~ .b ~ • ~ f f1. tU '~ o ~ ~ '_' -b O •bID ~ u ~ ~ U cd U cd cC >, id '~ cd ,.~ ... '~ ~ .o ~, o o U~ v W id ~ ~ ~ ° id a~i a`~'i ~ ai '~ ai ai . • rn ~~ v o 'd ~ G4 °~ `~ i :~ ~ '~ a`"i ~ a`"i ~ .r i ~ ~ n`"i ~ ~ i ^'' b O~ N •y ~•~• '~ y ~,,,~ O .--i ~~y+~+ F`r•, ~y ta..+.. M o~1O -~+.. '~ >"., V'1 ~ --~ jc~d' fl., ~-+ `~ ~ ~ Q~ ,O a N r~ -Q N Q N --'r Q N O Q N IL Q ~ y ~ ., ,: a; - a .. ,.~ , ~ ... ' ~,>~:. R r _ ~, • ~ .. ~ ... z~- V. .. N W .~ f ~~. .. z ~. 0 ~V ~> a, .e. °~ ` - - - R w ,. -- --- -- ~ .~ Y k . N ` ~ ~ o ~ ~ a~ ` ~ ; ;'~ a : ; ; ~ 3~;~ c ;v: -d-` ~, 0 ~ on ~ ~„ L 3 0 ~ o yU ,~, ~ ,,Q ~ , ~ ~ o ~ + cd U ~ U ~' ~ • ~ N ++ t .L'ri ~ ~ f ~..~ b ,~' '~•~<~ w CCS j I s b L ~ .o ~ U ~ la~ o~~ ,~zo` ~ ~ ~h~ ~ ._ a w ~~ ^ ~ ~ N . ~ N ~ ~~p O. U O ~ ~~o~~~ U O U t ~ c~ ~~ U ~ i ~' ~ U a~ ~ ~ ~``a °~ a-o~°:b ~ , .-, . U ~c 3 o c - ~ ~. ~,a.~ ~._ F ~, ~ >, on ~ •~, ~•, ~ > ~ ~ °? , ~ ~ ~]. bA a ~ c~ N . ~ ~ ti ~ "~ o ~ b ~ ~., ~ ~ ~' ~ ,~ cc! .p. ~ p .~ ' '9'' ,., . ~ ~ U ~ cti o a~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~.. w ~ n., ~, o o ~ o .~, .o ~ ; ~~ ~Q ..~ ^ a L •~ U o U ~ U ~ tip., N ~ ~ ~ ~ i L "' ~ ` ~ ~ 3 am i .~ ' ., a. ~ ° cat` o. > ~ .O ~ j a i ~ ~, y ~ ~ • ~ ~ ---' ~ . ~" ~ ° ~ ~ o •- ao 3 ~•~ o 0 3:~ ~ -~ 3 -o ~ ~ a a~i ~ Q -c`3 °~' •'~ c~V C , rn ,~ ~ v~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' o ~ ~ CZ...~ U .: ~ ~ ~ bA ~ 'O Uo ~ ~ o o ~ ~ O '~ ~ Li ~. ~ N ~ c~ ~ a" ao > c ^0 ,~ bA to Q +~ " +~ ~ G 'L3 DA ~ U ~ ~•~•~ ~•y'pC ~ cd k U U 'b ~ [/1 Wit"". N N ~ b L.' ,~ c ° 3 a do ~ ~'~ E ..+ U ~ ~ •y •~ p ~ o U ~ ~bA~ y ~~ `~~' cd. ~. N ~ y .~ U y ~ o ~ _ o ~, ~ a, ,o~.~~,~a~go~ a~ a U ._.• ~ ~. ~ o..~ v a 3 cis ~, U U U ~ ~ cC ~ ~ ~ ~-d a¢'o-c' 3.b ~ ~ `~ o 0 0 ~ ~o U .~ Q b U p,~ ~ cd ~ o •-' ~ 'b f-• 'Cy U s-. o o ..•. U ~' U ~ f-. ~. ao U -a cd a. cd cd . r t ~~ { o wk • Q at i 3 Y v i C a j .. a ~ a~ N -~ • ~ ~ '° >, do ~ ~ ~ O .~ 'C ,.C ~ ~ U .. ~ ~, E~3a ,~ >~ozs:-~ z ~ o ' ~ ~ ~ v-. b ° cd C O a) ~ ~ ~ ~ ...~ v~ 'd t" ~ v ~ '~ a C cV , ^ O ~ V :_ ~ . ~ . c~ ~ °' ~ _' '' c , :v ~ °' ° ~ U ~ bA U " y V .k d :.d •~ •a p ~ o >, y ~ ~ - ~ 0 W a. o b L=. ~ ~ ~ _ ,O U ~ ~ U ~ ~ .~ ~ .~ O ,~ ~_~ ~ ~ . •~ o .~ E ~ i o ~,~o~8d _.•~y ai ~.~o•~ .^". ~'" v~ ~n y v~ U N 3 'b ¢-..~ ~ '~ b ^., y •~ :.d ~~~•3-d~ . -d •~ U U p p~~ ~ N ~ N ~ cd ~'G _ > o ~ i cd 'C ~ N ~ ~ tU.. "C7 U ~ ~ aN 3 a-c7 .~•~ a.ow-b,w ~ ~ N U ~ L., .b ~ ~ ' A y cd ~ , 'C7 ~ V cd > C o cd -d v~ . ~. O ~ o . _. ~~v ~ U -~ ~ ~ ~ - o` ~ oar ~ o ~ ~ . ti . a.~ , a+ _ ~ ~..ti Cd a ~_ ~ ~ {.n ~ r~.y~~~. ~ ~ Lea ~. ~ .. 4 ~° r 1 ~ V1 a~ c ,.. a- a a~ p O _ s.. U .O W ~ 'B ..C ° o av~.~^~ ~~ tw a~caa~ occ c ~ a~ y~ N p, V ~~~ N U° t~.}? O~ .~ d ~"' `~ C y .C .y~' O x O cC nS C p T ~~ O ~ ~ y~ ~ ~ ~..~ ~ ,O ~ s., c~ V ~ y. -~ y p O O O ~ G) p V C, O c3 Vl G) ... ~~3: > V ~ V . ~ ~ CC 6> ° «S ~ Q N 'p >' d .1] v O b V>` ~. ~. V C pp.a V •Q y V O w O~ V cf., V. O O ,.._, C, N O ^~ ~. O 'in ~ «S s.. p -.O c~ ,~., ~ V v: p a~ cC ,•> „ o ~ ~ o ... ~, ~ s. ~ '~ ~ to ;~ ~ a~ ~ .c =`~ r nom ' 3 a `° o ~ .o '~ ~ ~ U o a~ a~ `'.~ ~ a~ c o~,~ cad >a~ ~ o~~s.~.~ cc,~:. ~ 'O tnC7•.. z. as ~w'~ ~~N.~U O v ~•..,.0... O a~* y. ~ ~~, c. ~^CJ y _~r.C4.. C~ .~ '.~~.~ ~ o a, o.~.c o.r.~ o.c o V > °' ~ o ~ ~ o ° ~ ~ ~~Q 3 ~-~ ~ ~b~~ o o p,.0 ~ N ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ ~, ~ o ~ ~ ~ v .~ o ~ N ~ ~~ b :~ .~ ~ ~ 'y >; c ~ x ~ ~ .~ y aci ~ o ~ o ~ a~i ~ °' ~.~E'" o ° ~ ai oa ~,~ o ~ aci° o G c~.cF-< ~;~U;~ ~ o~ ~U ~ cc .~_~~w ~ ~U ~.n o ~ 3 o a ~'n~ a~_ ~..,w.,~ v o ~ c 5 L1v~ '3 >,UV~ a. I,a~ a~~.r y.. c o.~ °o'ti ~ o o~'~`. a~ ~~ v ~i°~``~~ a.~ ~ .mac .~~~~3.~ ~~v~ ss.o.a~~a ~.y3 c, 3 0 'Q, a~ ca .c v, w o ...., .~y V b .c a~ c '~ vi ~v ~ ca v ~ -[ +-' ~ ., o ra ~ ~ ° ~~ ~ ~~ ~ Nora ~~•~~•• ~¢~ ~ ~;d _ _ • O -. a~ vpiy ~~~0 O vibes-~.0+'~.+ y.V s. ~ ~~ ~ O. 4~ ~. V 'b ~ y y Dim •~ ~ .~ ~0,,, c~ ~ y ~ ~n . 'O O ' ~ v~ ?, an~'~~ ~to oil ~ ~ c~~ °~`C.bn~'°~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~.o3>3r~~o'~oOa c°~s~~' ~~. ~aa. c a~ ~o,oo~io~~~'~b o~a~.~va~ ~ ~~ a~.+~ ~ ~•~ ~ Cara ~ ~.~.~ f3.~ ~ ai~.+".~ O~~ y .C ~ 7 .+ A ;Cf it rn ~ ~ R. O H N ~--~ .-. cd r.. s, i--~ 7 O~ V a+ pC x,, c~ C d O O S~L O ~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ r vi p d ~ to Lz+ 4 a+ ~ p.~- O C as .~ . ~ y.., ,~ .~ y0, .~ ~ c ~ c.V o 3.v ~~x ~ e+~ l.l/ .~ ~ C4 ~ ~ ~ ° S." ~ ~,,. ~ ry~~ 111..x... ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ 't7 ..., y bA r ~ N ..C C1. ~ ~ ~' ~ ~, ...... ~ G { ~ ~~~ r ~ ,. , ~ ~~. ~ ~~ ,~K.. , _ ~ ~' N~~.~:~ 00 ,~~$ ~~~ ~N~ L1 ~.,, ~ N C~ ~~ - m ~ G \ . .Z ~! ~3 :m €~ ~a z .~ C Z a a ,~ i z :~ n €a €Z 'O ZZ \/ -- ---- -- - € O C ~: ~ r ~ ~ i ¢, ~ ~„„ a~ `+." s. a> a~ a~ `«" rn ~ +' O y y y .O y V vi ~ y 'O ~ .d ."' vi a~ ~~ '~,p ~ ~ ""' C c~^p N ~ O ~ OHO cC O ~~ ~ O ~~ ~O ~ v°i ~ ~.LS H 0~i ~ ~'~~• ~ °' ~,~ ~ ~ O.~c ~ ~ ~.o a ?~a.~ ~ .~ U `~ VAS., ~...~~',o~F, ~.~ ~ c. ~ ~ o ° ~'~ ~ ~. `a vim. E..» o_~, ;~ ~'~i ~:c c on C c ~z ._~ti y o ~ ~, C a~¢ '3 ~ ;;~~ c'V o ~.U~ y > a ti c,~ 3~0~~ 'O a -~ c o•~ o ~ N.c winv''° ~ ~ C ~ ~•o _~~ c o a• a~ ~ 0 0 0 . o ~ o a~ ~„ a ~ c ~ a~ ,. "~~ ~TS~ V~ ~. •~'nVO i. ~ o x~Vmo coca ~3 ~'a°'i°' wo ca °.~ ~''c. o a~ o~ o ca _ Z ~w a ~.., a.~3 ~«•~.a~~o o .~ ~ac~a; ,d--~_ x~ Nya ova o ~.c y , s. ~ >, C!~ ti O ~ y .~ U ~ C O O .b .^.. H ~ ~ U ~ ~ a~ O ~ N ~ vi h .O C ..+ 7 _ ~ ~ O ~ y ~ y N 00 ~ O ,~ U a5 ~ ~ ".~ av'i voi ,~.., . c~ ~ •~ ~+ w pq ~ ,' .'~ ..] ~ ° Q. i„ •.~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ p 'p O bA ' ca .p ~ v .? o m a~ ~ o o y y e0 E a >>b •~ ~ ,~ ~ 3 •o ,: ;~ u o . ~ . 'C .J c~ ~~'i o$~ c ~ c~ s:a o c C.ti o .~ C o y ~i: ~' ~n~ V ~•~ .c'Sn~""~ ~o>'c~c~ ., ~o~ ~ a~ ~:~ a~,~boa~ocnU~~~, E"• ~~, o '~ ~, c Ts '~ '~ ~ c~ ~'' ~ ~ o a ~ x c a~ .~ w~ o o ~ a' a~ o a~ O ~ ..~ ~ • r, ~ ~ 3.w c7 a L ~ ~ ~ ~'C a<~ ~ 'p ~s a~ , c~ U s. w m ~ b U «. W c~ O G V s: N h a~ .~ v-+ a> . y ~, ~ 'C.-C E" _. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢< O ~ 0 n~'L~ o r< ~ cCf _ . r a. C M - - O ~ ~ ~ «S ,~ n..r .C H _~i, O J t•: ~ ; ~ :r m ,~ / f7d 1"7 G ....~D ~-/] V %-~i-~. _ 7 ~ ~ r~ V ~1 1r ~- /1 -~_, /-~C~/ 1/~G~r i~ t 2 2 . 2 J 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 t 3' ~~ -. .. ti • ,w ~ ~/ ~ I l am/ l // t `-~ K -1 Z 3 tl. .S ~ ~ ~ ILI ~I S 2 3 ~ 5 lo, ~ K 1 .~ 2 ~3 j c/ ~ 5" ' Ej _ ! °2 ~5 5 IN 'z 3 7 NI - 1 ( t. S.l 2 I i l 1 - _ - / 2 , S 13 10 18 . 11 14 zo y Z - I i $2'` 7 I 3 3 N I y 33 ND Ny ' 57 3 .I - - I °, / 2; ? ~f3 1 i I - I - - ~'3 '~ S 52 ~ 9 L(o 14!~ (c 9 6 Z "~..N N2 til 24 X10 u7 ~ '~13 Ny 13 32 28 24 33' 38 IS 8'~/ 53 'i3 37 38 33 ~{2 . 40 s t9 Z9 3o yy 31 Nl; 35 45 (~, 15 ~10 7 12_ 8 ly $S' 15 /G 8 9' 7 /0: ' q; ~ _ ~ ~~ } !/ ; 7 9~ S l3 /O ~ 7 -~ ,f~G.. 1 2 S l Y 3 3 7 - ~7 i - ~ ~ • ~7 ~ = ~ z / - °f 2 - - 9 0 3z 3y W9 ~ 9d ~ y9 5D 53 5'U ~ -- ' / .10 IZ I~ 7 13 , 13,, 13 5~ f ~- ~ ql --; / ~ - - ~ _ / - IL -5 { I `~ 12~ 2 l2 ~ ID S2 i' -- ; ~ z ~ / - l - ~ i - - ~ - 3 !° - ! 1 ! I S3 ~ !3 z5 ` 25"; 32 z9 zD i~G y3 3,2 3(~ NG yy; 3N' 37 33 y / ~ 2 °~ ~ ~ ' t l Z 2 y sy ~ ~ y z3 18 ~YIa ~''!!%~ ..~~ ~~ 11 !5 l8 !2 ~ it t9 .13 5 - / s / 2 3 - 2 SS - -- ~' 1 . I `- ! % ~ WS' 1~2 12' J2 9 1 3 9 1Z ~i _ - J - ~ ~ l / 2 Y - s(, 29 37^ Sz { 3!0 3!v 2(0 27 ~G 1 y~ `5 2 5 / / 7 f -} ~ 3 / S / (~ ~ S _ s7 N 7 37 ~ 57 y 9 52 y/ S3 q 1 3 a N S, 3; Co !~ 11 $ - / / ' 3~ `~y z i / Sd s~ y9 ,1 sy slL 3l 39 3y q~ 2 i 13 4, ~ 3 ' / S S~ 9 I8 zi ~2 2(o IS 24 22 59 19' zg za (z0 z~ 23 ~S q J 7 IS 15 ~ $ ~ $ $ 17 .o _S s y 8 1 ~ s~ 8 ~0 2 2 , y I l i y s ~ 100 - -~ -I 1 `- - /`. '=1 f 1 I z. I f l' - - ~ ~ 1 Co ~ Cv 8~ ~/ z 17 l~ lUI 3 y I S ~ 2? 3 3 `/~ :2 -! ! -j / 3 2 ! loZ G2 g9 '81 !90 99 113 75 (Di - I IZ~,-~/ -. /M . 3 ! 9~ t l0 2 z j .19 20 ~z !l ro3 s ~!o t . 7 ~ 9 5 103 7 l,l ~ % /o ; y . s ~:/a . 1 ; - - ~ ~ . •2 I '3 w 3 !rN X10 ~/I 33 ~~{2 , ~I`3~4' 2l~, `l4y 1 ~ I Z- i `~ ~ 1. Z -._3... S ; -- ` ~ ~ ' 2 - ~ •s 3 ( 3 1 </S 7 7 9S 8/0 ' 83 t77o' 7y Co &' / 05` ~, 2 2 3 ~ 2.1 ~ li$ _ 2 ~1 ~ ~ 2. /.~. 3-3- G _ ~ ;1~ - ~ I / - ~ 3 2 ~L (v5 5g lo3±GI I ~7b y5 (oG lUG N3 5055,, G 53 I H !~ y (o N 7 8 ~ l8 /D' 12` 8 /5 /3 G7 73 g3 . L$ 1•$0 go gl /oy tD7 I2 , 21v~25i 18 ,19 21_ .-33 . g , _ - ~-- 3 2 3 l~ 2 3 GFf ly ~ .~S !$ ; /l l S 24 17~ f0~ ~ -~ 1 ~ ! > ~ ~~-- ,-~=- 9 - g li ~ la q y~ l3 q- ~9 / - ~ ; l - ' / - l09 ~ ~-~} ~5 ?~, ~x~ 3 D 3y ~ 29 j53 3/v 37 ~ 35 N7 '10 - ~ ~ //U ~ _ ~` l _ E f::- -7_. 9 !~ °8 . l~• t3 12 71 8z z9 I l z 118 I Iz~ /33 laz I~l ~ =:.-.----_ e ~3.~~ 12 " -_y :. ~!c_ Z 3 5, .i 5 !~ 72 81 102. 8(v 1~ 109 130 /33 //2 P f:_ . `~ 3 9 . 5" lP 8 i (o f 12 13 73 z~ z0 21 23 1.5 22 13 1l3 w- Y~ `~ ~ - ~._. ¢ q. 2 7 l0 9 !o !l 7,y Iq '-7 !7 /7 !to D 18~ l/!~l _ ~ _ ~. Z~ s _ll -a l y ~ Is 13 ~~ 7s y 4 ~ I ~ ~ .2 y~ Its ~ y ,'~ ~ y 7 s s.. p ~. Jr ~ ~ _. _. -- ~ 7 ~ - ~ -- 1. ' / 3. 2 z 11 ~. lP l y l y : l7 13 /,~ 7.: ~ =" 4 79 - ~ / ~ 1 3~ I ~- „Z 1l9 3 9 jZ7~3: 2 ~o,. ] ., .y ,~ r 3 3 ~.ea. E - I~ ~ r E~9 ~ `~ k I IZ 3 N 5 ~fo #~ ,~ ! I 2. 3 ~ 5 lv S K I I Z 3 j~ ~5 6 1 2 ~5 5 ly 2 3 ~ 7 Nt SI 2 I C I I - - 2 8 13 10 l $ II 14 ~ z0 y1 - ~ - $2 7 I 3N 3 y 33 ~ 40 4 y 5 7 3 - ~ - - 1 / 2 ~ z ~J' I ~ 1 ( - I -' - ~3 '~ 8 51 ~{ q U/~ ( 4(v (0 9 b 2 y a.N y2 H! 24 Ito N7 43 yy 13 32 28 24 33 38 IS ~~/ s3 y3 37 38 33 42- 40 S 19 Z9 30 yy :31 NI 35 45 (~ 15 10 7 12 6 !y gS 15 !Lv S 9' 7 %0:: 9 -` ! ~1% 1/ ; 7 9 S 13 /O 7 ,JG~ 1 S l! y ~- 3 3 7 - N7 - / - 1 - / / ~7i -- 2 / - 2 - - 8 .._- 4`6 ~ 3!o s3 37 ~ 45 3g 2B 3a ~~' I ~ / 3 / - 1 q N9 ~ ~ z 3' v ~ ~ ly r- ~ - - ' ~ - I _ 3 { ~0 3z 3y 49 ~ yn X19 so s3 SO - / - i = ~ ~- _ = , ry0 ' / y ~ 2 3 j S 1 3 r/ I n I Z I R 7 13 1 3 ~ 13 ,5f ~ _ r~ I q i / f - ~ - r_ /L S ~ I I 9 12 2 l 2 I D S2 i -- - - - - - / q 2 / - / - i - - _-__ ~3 ! -' 1 I - 1 r I S3 13 z5 2.5'~ 32 z9 zO 2G a3 32 3!~ SIG t N~f ; 3y 37: 33 ly / ~ 2 r ~ t / 2 2 1 sy 1 y z3 18 ~ ID 1/ 5 to ~~ II 15 l8 t2 { it 19 13 ~,; - ' r / 2 3 - 2 SS - - 2 ; f - / / WS 12 12 12 9 ~ 13 9 I Z r~ _ - -- 1 # 1 I a H -- s~ 29 3 7 52 ~ 3l0 3lv ~.(0 27 9 G - ~ . 5 2 ~ S / : /' _ 17 - ~ 3 ~ / S / (~ S 57 N 7 37 y 9 57 51 Y / S3 9 7 3 S 3 Co ~ y !~ ; ly ~g - / ~~ 3 y z l .Sd s~ y9 sy; sl 3/ 39 3y ~9~ 2 3 4 3' / S S 19 /$ zl ~2' 1~ IS 24 22 59 19' z~ za I za ~-~} 23 IS 59 7 is IS ~ $ $ 8 17 o _ ~ : 5 K. 8 `1; s 8 GAD 2 2 ~! ! I / i y S• !00 - - ! - I / - _-_ l ZI / j Z I f l - - r lv 1 Cv Cv 8~ ~/ 2 1 7 !0 1171 3 y~ S ~ 2 3 3 '-/. z2 / J - ; 1 3 2 J !oZ /02 g4 8- ! 90 99 113 75 /OZ - 1 I ~ ~ - . / - - / ~3 -19 I~ zz r9 ~o !s 1/ m3 s ~ 1 Z 7 ~ 9 5 /03 7 rl ~ ~ In ! y .~: -~a ~~ . l :, . -- - 1 ~ Z ~ 3 3 Gy X10 yl ~ 33 { ~{1 30 1 3N Zl~ IOy I ~ ! 2 ~ `f ~ I . .Z::: .:3.- 'S . _- ~ 2 - ~ S 3 3 1 !e5 7 7 9S 8!o 1 83 7!o 1 7N Cob ! 05 2.2 23 ~ x, l ~ i $ 2 N 2l~ _ 3:3_ G - ' l - ~ I - 3 2 (oG (05 58 G•3 G 1 70 y5 GL lOG y3 50 ~ 55l N/o 53 Gy __ loN .7 5. l8 /0 f 2 8 lS !3 G 7 73 83 ~ 8 ~ 8o go Sl ~ `l t ~7 12 2/v ' 2 S I 1 g 19 ~ I _ . 33 .g ~ 1:~: 3 _2 3 l~ 2 3 (e$ ~y ~ 15 /9 ~ rl /S z4 17 fob 7 7 I ! 3 ( 7 S_ .=7._.:: ~~_ '9 : s IZ /a q 9 i3 9 ~9 / - ~ i r - / - l09 21 t7 ; Is ~~ zl t~{ 13 rp .3y ~-`) S3 3!0 37 35 N7 70 /IU 2 ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 G g'- - :~/. i ~:7 . ~ 9 /y 8 (o ' 13 I Z 71 8 z I z9 111 118 LZIo l33 I02 /1 / 32 Z!o 3S ~ 32 1 35 3y: _32: z :_y _ l~_ 2. 3 S 5 !~ 7Z S7 Int. S(o 12b l09 130 /33 Ill y s I °~ 3 l _ _.55~- :~y~:. 3 .9. S .l0 8 fo i 12 13 73 ~~i zO 21 23 15 22 13 !r3 (a 7 i ~ ~ // to lO ,-9-__ ~ _q 2 7 /0 9' !o !l 7Y' Iq 17 17 17 !~ !O 18 //Cl 3 1 ~ 3 2 ! 1/ :z. s !L: lO 17 9 /s 13 2~f 7s y 4 ~. I I 2 y //s ~ y ;~ ~ y 7 S 5: ---- 7 77~ ~ - 1 3 1 l - Ill 3 5 ; 3 ; 9 y 9: ~.. d :- ~ 7~' - ~ - / ~ / 3 2 2 /j~ lP l y i /y 117 13 /'f :7.: ~ _~, ~~~,; ~ ~, Try -~ / ~/ ~ 3 / - 2 /l9 3 9 ~~ 7 3 2~ ~-~ ..._ , ~ \ \ \ ` - 1z~ ~~9 Jl~ ~ ~l7 Saxon LJght //lP !<S /~ ~~3 Floating Fsath.r ll~ ~ t o ~I / 8 X07 /aG ws' ~o ~o/ goo q q s~<< sU<< H ~ I0~ Io3 a~/ ` wy.~ Chlndcn 1 " I ~ ~ ~(p ~~ ~ Botk ~ .. tics ~• 3 Mc1Alllan v ~I ~~ ~9 ~~ ~6~. g~ ~~.,~ ~W~' ~~ g2 { ~stl~s< ~~ 79 ~g 77 7~ 7~" 7y z3~"7zV 7% Franklin ~/ ~D `1 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ Ov.rland t~3 0 3 3/0 ~ 3S _! vl~:o 3'~ 33 3z 3 j 3O ~q 2~ 27 a s 2(v I zs ~ ~`~ ~3 z~ 21 za I~ Am It Lak.Flai.i ~~ t7 !~ ~5 ~~ ~3 iz tl ~a { _ ~ 9 7 ~ Cclumbla ~ 3 G ~~ ~~ a 4 ~ ~ e ~ . Hubtn~rd ~ ~ € Y' ~ _~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ 2 -~ a o -+ o ~ ~' Y . c N,. ~ ° r ~ ~ ~ ~ c3 .. ° I J