Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGlacier Springs PP P&Z PacketOctober 13, 2003 PP 03-028 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING October 16, 2003 APPLICANT Tuscany Development, InC. ITEM NO. 9 REQUEST Public Hearing -Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 52 building lots and 8 other lots on 17.5 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for proposed Glacier Springs Subdivision -north of East Victory Road and east of South Meridian Road ___ AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: COMMENTS See affached Staff Comments See attached Comments C orn ~4pp ~l~ ~v C I ~ "Ok with Meridian Water. Department" No Comment See attached Comments See affached Comments No Comments See attached Comments See attached Comments INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: orHER: Sew attached Leifer from Contacted: Emailed: Coven ~~ Date: O S Phone: Staff Initials: Materials presented of public meetings shall become property of the Ciy of Meridian. CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET DATE October 16, 2003 ITEM # 9 PROJECT NUMBER PP 03-028 PROJECT NAME Glacier Springs Subdivision NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL I ~ I i s~~-zr. L ~~ Z~ ~ ~- ~ ~~ P~~,«,,~ X S~c`,c ' haH~ ~ '~ ~ ~~ ~ x HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT Reber[D. Coirie CITY COU CITY OF MERIDIAN (208, 28R~2499 .Fax 288y5O1 NCll. MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Tammy deWeerd 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAIID $3(14], (208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297 Cherie McCandless (208) 888-4433 ~ FAX (208) 887-0813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888.4218 ~ PLANNING AND ZONNG William LM. Nary DEPARTMENT (208) 8845533 ~ FAX 888-6854 MEMORANDUM: October 16, 2003 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Z a ni ng Commission RECEIVE D From: y r l Wendy Kirkpatrick, AICP, Planner II I~'V~l`' ~0 ` OCT i 3 2003 Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech ~- Ciiy Of Meridian Re: Glacier Springs Subdivision City Clerk Office • Annexation and Zoning of 17.5 Acres from RUT (Ada County} to R-8 (Medium Density Residernial District), by Tuscany Development Corp. (Fide No. AZ-03-02~. • Preliminary Plat Approval of Fifty-two (52) Building Lots and Eight (8) Other Lots on 17.5 Acres, by Tuscany Development Corp. (File No. PP-03-028). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as conditions of approval These wnditions shall be considered in fuly unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY The applicant, Tuscany Development Corporation, has applied for Annexation and Zoning, and Preliminary Plat approval of 52 building lots on 17.5 acres of land located on Victory Road, west of Locust Grove Road. The project is located immediately to the east of Observation Point subdivision and immediately to the west of Kachina Estates subdivision. The requested zoning designation for the subdivision is R-8. The gross density of the project is 2.97 d.u./acre; the net density is 3.62 d.u./acre. The proposed single-family detached lots within the subdivision range from 7,824 to 21,357 square feet. The "other" lots within the subdivision include fifteen {15) common landscape/drainage lots. LOCATION The property is located on Victory Road approximately 1/2 mile west of Locust Grove Road, with frontage on the north side of Victory Road. AZ03021.PR03-02H Glecia Spm~~AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council October 16, 2003 Page 2 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North: Rural residential/agricultural properties, zoned RUT (Ada County) West: Observation Point Subdivision, zoned R-4 East: Kachina Estates subdivision, zoned RUT South: Rural residentiaVagricultural properties, zoned RUT (Ada County) OWNER OF RECORD The property owner of record is Tuscany Development Corporation and they have provided notarized consent for submission of these applications. ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Stcrnatards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particulaz facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment." The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff: A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment; Staff finds that the requested zoning designation, R-8, is harmonious with and in accordance with the effective Comprehensive Plan (`02) and Future Land Use Map. The parcel is designated for Medium Density Residential (3 to 8 dwelling units per acre). The project has a gross density of 2.97 dwelling units per acre and a net density of 3.62 dwelling units per acre. The common open space for the project is 0.97 acres (5.5 % of the plat area). B. is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the future; The applicant has not indicated that they intend to rezone the subject property in the future. C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the fashion that woWd be allowed under the new zoning -for example, a residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use permits; Staff finds that the proposed subdivision of single-family detached homes will be allowed within the requested R-8 zone. Glacier SymgsOlaci¢ SFVm~AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Conunission/Mayor & City Council October 16, 2003 Page 3 D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; The area in the vicinity of Locust Grove Road and Victory Road has undergone a significant level of development recently. Tuscany Village subdivision has recently been approved south of Victory Road and Sageland subdivision and Soda Springs subdivision are cun•ently proposed on the east side of the subject property along Victory Road. Sageland and Soda Springs have both requested R-8 zoning designations. E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmooions and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed use (single family residential) is designed appropriately to match with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity. Any change in the existing character of the area is in harmony with the intended future land use envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony to determine whether or not the proposed use will be disturbing or hazardous to the existing or future neighboring uses. Staff does not anticipate that the proposed residential and office uses will be hazardous or disturbing to future or existing neighbors, as long as the recommended conditions of approval are complied with. G. Witl the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; Staff finds that the property to be annexed will be served adequately by all essential public facilities and services. An existing sewer tnmk line runs through the subject property. Sanitary sewer and water shall be provided via existing and new main line extensions. Applicant shall be required to pay for the extension of water and sanitary sewer mains to and through the proposed development. Public road access to the proposed subdivision is available off of Victory Road and nzo3-ma, PP-m~oze Cileaer Spm~Oleciet S~i~AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council October 16, 2003 Page 4 Loggers Pass Street (a stub provided by Observation Point subdivision.) All internal streets will be constructed by the developer of the proposed subdivision. The Commission and Council should review ACHD, School District, Police and Fire Department's comments concerning this subdivision for further information regazding public services. H, Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; Staff finds that there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and that the annexation and zoning will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfaze. See Annexation and Zoning comment G. L Will the proposed uses not involve'uaes, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not create excessive traffic, noise or other nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding azea. Staff recognizes the fact that traffic and noise will increase with the approval of this subdivision; however staff does not feel that the amount generated will be detrimental to the public welfare of the city. J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Staff finds that the subdivision's vehicular approaches off of Victory Road will create new traffic on surrounding roads. However, staff does not believe that the subdivision entrances will cause significant interference on the sunrounding public streets. Please review ACHD comments concerning vehicular approaches and traffic generation. IC. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and Staff fmds that no natural or scenic features of major importance will be lost or damaged by approving the annexation and re-zone. Any existing trees lazger than 4" caliper that are removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance. AZ03~024 PP-03.028 Cileaef SPrinesGlacier Sp~ings.AZPP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council October 16, 2003 Page 5 L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592,11-17-1992)? Staff finds that the annexation of this property would be in the best interest of the City. ANNEXATION AND ZONING COMMENTS Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 2: The legal description for annexation and zoning appears to describe the subject property, and complies with the requirements of the State Tax Commission and City of Meridian. PREL111~IINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND 12EOUIliEMENTS Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the following: a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan; Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Medium Density Residential. The proposed zoning designation of R-8 complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation. b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; Staff finds that public services are available to accommodate the proposed development. See Annexation and Zoning comment G. c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program; Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. See Annexation and Zoning comment G. d. The public t"mancial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Staff finds that the develapmem will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services. See Annexation and Zoning Comment G. ~~a Pe~~ Gleda Spm~~Gletia SPririgsAZPP Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council October 16, 2003 Page 6 e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the Commission's attention. Staff fmds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Council or Commission's attention. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Block Length: Block 2 is longer than the maximum block length of 1000 feet per Ordinance 12-4-5. The applicant must provide a stub to the east. The stub should line up with existing property lines or be placed in an area where a road can be routed around existing homes. 2. Relocation of Trinidad Drive: ACRD has requited the applicant to move Trinidad Drive (the entrance to the subdivision) to the east. The applicant shall be required to submit a revised plan depicting this change and how the change will affect the open space area along Trinidad Drive. STTE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / PRELIlI-TINARY PLAT 1. Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be via the existing Ten Mile Tnank which passes through the subject property. 2. Domestic water service to this site shall be via main line extensions from mains installed adjacent to the property. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department 4. The applicant has indicated that the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and operated by The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all lots within this development: The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessmems for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 5. A detailed fencing plan shall be submitted upon application of the final plat. Permanent perimeter fencing shall be required around the subdivision unless the City agrees in writing that such a fence is not required. ATA3-07A, PP-030]8 Cilecier SymigsClecier Sprmga.AZPP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council October 16, 2003 Page 7 6. All fencing adjacent to the pathway along the north boundary of the subdivision shall be restricted to 4-foot maximum height for solid fencing or 6-foot maximum for see-through fencing. Fences along micropaths have the same restriction per Ordinance 12-13-15-9. 7. In accordance with Ordinance 12-13-10-8, Applicant shall provide detached sidewalks adjacent to Victory Road. 8. Create atwenty-foot (20') wide common area centered over the existing sanitary sewer trunk between Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, or per the ACRD requirement, relocate S. Trinidad Drive to cover the trunk line. 9. The groundwater report submitted with the application was for the Observation Point project to the west. Please submit test results from land within this projects boundaries, or a signed statement from a certified soils scientist that establishes the depth to the highest normal groundwater on the site. If depth to groundwater becomes an issue in this subdivision and DEQ, or other regulatory agency, requires impermeable surfacing in the storm water detention azeas, such azeas shall not be counted toward the required open space calculation. 10. Please provide a grading and drainage plan for the south end of the development due to the amount of grading that will be necessary to construct the subdivision. 11. Unless a waiver is granted by Council, the applicant shalt be responsible to the all irrigation ditches, laterals, and canals per MCC 12-4-13.1. 12. Ten (10) copies of a revised plat shall be submitted to the City Clerk's Office at least ten days prior to the next public hearing for this application. GENERAL COMMENTS Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's approval letter for the subdivision name, and the lot and block numbering. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3: A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, play equipment, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 4. All pathways within the proposed subdivision shall be designed in accordance with MCC 12-13-15 "Micropath Landscaping". nzaa-0z<, PP-o3a2s CAeoa Spdn®Glecier Spmge.AZPP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council October 16, 2003 Page 8 5. A detailed landscape plan, in compliance with the Landscape Ordinance, shall be submitted for the subdivision with the final plat application. 6. Sidewalks within the proposed subdivision shall be built in accordance with MCC12-13- 10-8. Two-hundred-fifty and one-hundred-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light cornractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 8. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need-'to be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owner's), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 9. Please submit all updated groundwater/soils reports to the Public Works Department for review. Any drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water is retained only during 100-year storm events, and for a period of time not to exceed 24 hours. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. 10. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed. 11. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 12. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 13. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the submitted preliminary plat and Annexation and Zoning applications with Conditions of Approval. nzosoaq Pe-ro.ozs (Aacie~ Spti~gaCleci¢ Sp~mgs.AZ.PP TO: Meridian Planning and,Zoning Commission 1'R: Jerry L'avcn /Victory 41 1,1,C ~~ i` ~ 0 1003 ~;iv tJfbleridi~u,. ..~ltt' L'l8rk n1~2CF;. Rl;: Proposed subdivision (;lacier Springs, located on Victory Rd, B:~u of Mcvidian Rd Uatc: October 8, 2003 City Planners; it has come to my attention that there are proposed plans fora 52 home-site subdivision adjacent to the Olncrvation Point subdivision. 'f his proposed subdivision is an IZ-K subdivision that will put substantially smaller homey next to the Observation Point subdivision, which is an R-4 subdivision. When we submitted our plans for the Observation Point subdivision several years ago, we were met with great cathusiacm in regards to bringing higher home values to the Meridian landscape. The Observation Paint subdivision has am uvcrtgc home value <rl'approximalcly $350,000.OU. It would be of considerable concern to me to allow these smaller Homes to adversely affect the value of the home-sites at Observation Point subdivision. y suhmiticd, ~" Craven MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE COIMCIl. MEMBERS WILLIAM L.M. NARY KEITH B(RD TAMMY DE WEERD CHERIE MCCANOLESS RURAL FIRE COMMISSIONERS RICHARD GREENS TEaav LGIGIITON STEVE GLLIOTT ru. ~r...-~Yl G'YlGt~Ir~,~Z,~ ~'` ~~ `, N E, 1pAH6 j ~~'e . , ri ~," ,`` _ e ~ - ~~. .`. 'M. r. _`''ERICiAPd CITY/RURAL FIRE DEPARTNiEN1 I;HIEF KEN W'. BO~A'EItS UF,PUTY CHIEF -FIRE PREVENTION IOSEPH SIL VA DEPUTY CHIEF - TR 41NMG BILL JOHNSON 540 East Fra^klin Roaci Meridian, 1D 8364^- (308)SR8-1234 Fay t2os~ a~,-os~o October 10, 2003 ,_ , ~ ~ 200 i. ~, i City Of 14ieridian City Clerk Office TO: Mayor, City Council & Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention SUBJECT: Glacier Springs Subdivision AZ 03-024, PP 03-028 The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of fire protection for the proposed project: 1. That afire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute be available to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 2. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction begins. 3. Acceptance of water supply for fire protection is contingent upon acceptance of the water system by the City of Meridian for water quality. 4. All radii shall be 28' inside and 48' outside radius. 5. The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal. Achievement of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is intended to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic Life Support. The budget constraints are typically defined as capital outlay for facilities that are located within 1.5 miles from a given location and sufficient operational funds to staff the facilities. 6. According to a report completed by Fire & Emergency Services Consulting Group in February of 2000 our requests for service are projected to reach 2800 in the year 2005 and 3800 by the year 2010, this is up from 2069 responses in the year 2000. MAYOR Robert D. Cowie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird ~ <9~ (:ITV OF d~^i - eri~i~~~_~~ \, A IDAHO J j tie j CFN TFR ~ TgEASURE V~~y ~ i SINCE i 190] LEGAL DEPARTM ENT (208) 466-9272 • PAX 46G4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: October Transmittal Date: September 3, 2003 File No.: PP 03-028 Request: Preliminary Plat approval of a proposed R-8 zone for proposed Glacier Springs Subdivision By: Tuscany Development, Inc. Location of Property or Project: north of 2003 Hearing Date: October 16, 2003 lots and 8 other lots on 17.5 acres in and east of South Meridian Road David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FPJ Michael Rohm, P2 (No VAR, VAC, FPJ Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FPJ Robert Corrie, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FPJ Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney Cit Engineer ity Planner Parks Department Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP ~~ty) Ada County Highway Distrid Ada County Development Services Central Distrid Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. Distrid Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PPonlyJ U.S. West (FPrPP only) Intermountain Gas (FPiPP ~~ty) Bureau of Reclamation (FPiPP antyJ Idaho Transportation Department (No FPJ Ada COUOty (AnnexationoMy) Ada County Land Records (FPiPP onryJ Meridian Development Corporation Historical Preservation Commission ~/'I.OrL~c~iW' ~~ SEP 16 2003 City Of Mernidfffifiiarrnpp Ctty ~~T1~AS'P7DT.H0 AVENUE • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (20S) 887-4813 CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT •• DISTRICT C ~IEALTH Environmental Health Division DEPARTMENT Rezone # Conditional Use # Preliminary /Final /Short Plat Return to: ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden City ,Meridian ^ Kuna ^ AC2 ^ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. $EP i 6 2UU3 ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. City Of Meridian City Clerk Office ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require mare data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ or bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ~Rtral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ~B=central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ' ~ The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: Viral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ~sentral water 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store Please see attached stormwater management recommendatations Date: ~l~l ~~ ^ 15. Reviewed By: ~ /~~~~, coeoswoi~ Review Sheet CENTRAL ®! DISTRICT rHEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. • 8015E, ID 83704-0825 • (208) 375-5211 • FAX 327-8500 To prevent and !rear disease and disabilim; zn promale healrhi~ lifesry~les; and ro protect and promare the heolrh mrd qualirr of our en virnnmeirl. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that storm water bepre-treated prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality: The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Managelent Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, July 1997. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, May 2000. w~a.iz,.. orm Ada I Boise County Office 7C7 N. lumstrona PI. Boise, ID E370C Enviro. Health: 3277455 Family Planning: 327-740G immunizations: 327-7450 Senior Nutrition: 327-74fiG WIC: 327~74EE FAX: 527-6500 Serving Valle~•, Elnaor•e, Boise, mad Ada Cozorlic~ Eimore County Office 52C E 8t:`. St. North Mountain Home. IC E364i Envira. Heath: 587-522` Famiiv Heath: 5€7-4407 K1C SEi-44C5 FAX: SE7-3521 Valley County Otiice 705 N. 1st ;t. E0. Boz 144E McCzl!, ID E363E Ph. 654-it54 FSY: 634-2174 Proporing O Todoy's Studen6 for a°n.ny.•. T°~`°W° N Joint School District No. 2 ~ 5~°~ 911 Meridian Road • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • (208) 855-4500 • Fax (208) 888-6700 SUPERINTENDENT Christine H. Donnell September 10, 2003 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Planners: RECEIVED SEP 2 3 2003 City Of Meridian City Clerk Ofiice The Meridian School District has experienced phenomenal student growth the last ten years. The high schools, middle schools, and elementary schools throughout the district are operating over capacity. Approval of Glacier Springs Subdivision will have a significant impact on school enrollments at Marv McPherson Elementarv. Lake Hazel Middle, and Mountain View High School. We can predict that these homes, when completed, will house fifteen (15) elementary aged children, fourteen (14) middle school aged children, and eleven (11) senior high aged students. Additional students will further compound the current overcrowded situation. Residents cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school, as it maybe _____ necess~+ to bus students to other schools across the district.. Scho©I capacity is addressed in Idaho Code 67-6508. The Meridian School District is currently operating beyond capacity. Future developmuent will continue to have an impact on the district's capacity. If you have any questions, please contact me at 888-6701. Sincerely, ~~~~ ~~ Wendel Bi Supervisor of Facilities and Construction RECENE~r SEP 2 ? 2003 City of Meridiaa QQ rye City Clerke(lfficcr !~ ~l I/~ ~~ [JL2~ZGCt 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 16 September, 2003 William Berg City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 RE: PP 03-028/AZ 03-024 Glacier Springs Subdivision Dear Will: Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires a Land Use Change Application be filed for review prior to final platting. Ail laterals and waste ways must be protected. All municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. Please contact Donna Moore at 466-7861 for further information. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. Thank you, Bill Henson Asst. Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District BHldbg C: Water Superintendent S. Arnold, Briggs, Eng. Rider 4 File -Office/Shop APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - d0,000 RECENEI` SEP 2 2 2~3 City ofMeridisn COPY /~ ~ ~ City Clerk Offince 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Steve Arnold Briggs Engineering 1800 W. Overland Boise, ID 83705 RE: Land Use Change Application -Glacier Sarinus Subdivision Dear Mr. Arnold: Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above-referenced development. If this development is under a "rush' to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application. Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned, operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P. Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's office, or John P. Anderson, at the District's shop. Sincerely, Donna N. Moore, Asst. SecretarylTreasurer NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DNM/smc cc: File Water Superintendent Will Berg, City Clerk, Meridian City Tuscany Development Inc., PO Box 344, Meridian, ID 83642 Jim & Shirley Cobble, 15 N. Ridgeway, Jerome, ID 83642 enc. APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 18 September 2003