Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application
CjQirE IDIAN'l�� R IDAHO 0 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Brad Hoaglun Charles Rountree David Zaremba To ensure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk, by: December 14, 2010 Transmittal Date: November 24, 2010 File No.: MDA 10-010 & VAR 10-002 Hearing Date: December 21, 2010 Request: Public Hearing - Modify the existing Development Agreement to update the owner information & development plan AND Variance to UDC 11-3H-36 to allow a right-in/right-out access point to/from the site via Eagle Rd between Pine Ave & Commercial St. for Scentsy Campus By: Sam Johnson, H.O.T. 1, LLC Location of Property or Project: Southwest corner of E. Pine Avenue and N. Eagle Road Joe Marshall (No FP) Scott Freeman (No FP) Wendy Newton-Huckabay (No FP) Michael Rohm (No FP) Tom O'Brien (No FP) Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Charlie Rountree, C/C Brad Hoaglun, C/C Keith Bird, C/C David Zaremba C/C Sanitary Services (No VAR, vac, FP) Building Department/ Rick Jackson Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Public Works / Scott Steckline City Planner City Engineer Economic Dev. (CUP only) Parks Department Your Concise Remarks: Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP/SHP only) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health COMPASS (Comp Plan only) Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrig. District Idaho Power Co. (FP,PP,CUP/SHP only) Qwest (FP/PP/SHP only) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP/SHP only) Idaho Transportation Dept. (No FP) Ada County Ass. Land Records Downtown Projects: Meridian Development Corp. Historical Preservation Comm. South of RR / SW Meridian: NW Pipeline New York Irrigation District Boise-Kuna Irrigation District Boise Project Board of Control / Tim Page City Clerk's Office • 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-4433 • Fax 208-888-4218 • www.meridiancity.org LJ C *% E IDIAN*:--- J Planning Department CONMSSION & COUNCIL REVIEW APPLICATION Type of Review Requested (check all that apply) ❑ Alternative Compliance ❑ Annexation and Zoning ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Conditional Use Permit Modification ❑ Design Review ❑ Final Plat ❑ Final Plat Modification ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ Private Street ❑ Rezone ❑ Time Extension (Commission or Council) ❑ UDC Text Amendment ❑ Vacation (Council) X Variance f �t I Other �Jei w.e,.�l 4t4Me" * /1fakke,44 Information Applicant name: Applicant address: 36C(6 E_ Lc,^c�t k - Applicant's interest in property: XOwn ❑ Rent ❑ Optioned ❑ Other Owner name: 907-1. L -1-c. Owner address: 3618 C LQ. rk Agent name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): Sa PK e— Firm name: Address: Primary contact is: Applicant ❑ Owner ❑ Agent ❑ Other Contact name: E-mail: 5�\O�KSo,,, (2_5C_Cn 1L, Ep►n.� Subject Property Information Phone: 96-5'— 061-7 Zip: 9904,z Phone: SSS =06 17 zip: 23447 - Agent 3G4Z Phone: Zip: Phone: 855- Obl7 Fax: -y30(o Location/streetaddress: SOwkk-, Qes Cor,nee- at- 1?i ale ✓✓�vt + cue- �� Assessor's parcel number(s): _ :5#08 c//7 yZO Township, range, section: 31i1 16 $ :56 Y-/ Total acreage: Current land use: /iii Xel (&t z - I`Z.e��'a.. �, l Current zoning district: 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 1 M 0 • Project Description Project/subdivision name: c`�G.2 v�'f S.�/ ( A*4 pw S General description of proposed project/request: l2rpc r -e- f'i Cr�w�Dv. 5 iv�G`u. +kc af4AA-5, J-rcxj..i. 4 LtiLA/:CS Proposed zoning district(s): C' C56JA•4L-, Acres of each zone proposed: 3 < ?,A/ Type of use proposed (check all that apply): ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial WOffice ❑ Industrial ❑ Other Amenities provided with this development (if applicable): ?&.r" , `( (oma 4 Who will own & maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? 0 T 1- LL C. Which irrigation district does this property he within? !! e7TXtlJ Primaryirrigation source: "Z'ky Secondary: Square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated (if primary or secondary point of connection is City water): Residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of residential units: Number of common and/or other lots: Number of building lots: Proposed number of dwelling units (for multi -family developments only): 1 Bedroom: Minimum square footage of structure(s) (excl. garage): Minimum property size (s.f): Gross density (DU/acre-total land): Percentage of open space provided: Percentage of useable open space: 2 or more Bedrooms: Proposed building height: Average property size (s.f.): Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys): Acreage of open space: (See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space) Type of open space provided in acres (i.e., landscaping, public, common, etc): Type of dwelliiig(s) proposed: ❑ Single-family ❑ Townhomes ❑ Duplexes ❑ Multi -family Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of building lots: Other lots: Gross floor area proposed: Existing (if applicable): Hours of operation (days and hours): Building height: Percentage of site/project devoted to the following: Landscaping: Building: Paving: Total number of employees: Maximum number of employees at any one time: Number and ages of students/children (if applicable): Seating capacity: Total number of parking spaces provided: Number of compact spaces provided: Authorization Print applicant name: Applicant signature: _ Phone: (208) Date: 33 E. adway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 884- 3 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 2 (Rev. 11/4/08) 3698 E. Lanark Meridian, Idaho 83642 November 18, 2010 City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. Suite 210 Meridian, Idaho 83642 877.855.0617 toll free 208.888.4306 fax n #Ww.sYDr11 RE: Application for Development Agreement Modification & request for Variance. Dear Council Members, H.O.T. 1, LLC. recently purchased a portion of the Pinebridge Subdivision, a 35 acre parcel at the south- west corner of State Highway 55 (Eagle Rd) and Pine Ave in Meridian in order to develop a corporate campus for Scentsy, Inc. Scentsy is one of the fastest growing companies in the country and we have chosen this location for our world headquarters. During our planning efforts of this site, we have met several times with your staff and have determined the best course of action is to submit two applications for your review and approval; a Development Agreement Modification and a request for Variance to allow the upgrade of an existing access point onto State Highway 55 (Eagle Rd.). DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MODIFICATION Pinebridge Subdivision was approved on February 19, 2008 (file #AZ 07-006, RZ 07-010 & PP 07-008 and Ordinance No. 08-1348). The Development Agreement between the City of Meridian and DMB Investments, LLC. was recorded on February 28, 2008 under instrument #108022893. We wish to modify that agreement and enter into our own development agreement to reflect changes in ownership and accommodate our specific site plan. We have made several minor modifications to the entire agreement to update owner information, delete re -zoning references and any other non -applicable information. Other sections were changed to match our specific development plans and proposed requirements. For the most part, those sections include the following: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, and 16. Please compare the attached copy of the original development agreement with the proposed modified development agreement for specific changes. • VARIANCE REQUEST We would also like to apply for a Variance to allow an access point to Eagle Rd. between Pine Ave. and Commercial St. This access will be designed, channelized and signed to allow only right -ins and right - outs as detailed in the approved ITD Encroachment Permit #3-11-135 (attached). Per this approved permit, a right -turn deceleration lane is also required on the southbound approach. This permit was granted to the previous owners and recently transferred into our name. A traffic analysis, dated November 17, 2010, was conducted by Stanley Consultants and can be found attached to this application. This report demonstrates that the addition of this right-in/right-out only access will reduce traffic at the nearby intersection of Eagle & Pine and will improve the overall operation, safety and circulation of the site. Reduced traffic will also result in lower vehicle miles travelled, fuel consumption and emissions. Approving this variance request will not demonstrate any special privilege because many similar encroachments have been allowed along Eagle Rd. in recent years. We appreciate the time you and your staff dedicate to applications such as these. We ask that you approve the Development Agreement Modification as well as the requested Variance. Thank you, Sam Johnson Facilities Project Manager Scentsy Inc. DESCRIPTION FOR PINEBRIDGE PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT R.O.S. NO. 8793 PARCEL 2 JUNE 13 2010 A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE SE % OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SE'/ (EAST'/ CORNER) OF SECTION 8, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, THENCE S 01°02'07" W 83.97 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SE'/ OF SAID SECTION 8 TO A POINT; THENCE N 88057'53" W 70.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF PINE AVENUE AND THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF EAGLE ROAD, THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF EAGLE ROAD THE FOLLOWING: THENCE S 01°02'07' W 738.04 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 71 °10'34" W 74.43 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 01°02'07" W 50.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 69031'00" E 13.77 FEET TO A POINT; LEAVING THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF EAGLE ROAD: THENCE N 88055'23" W 1795.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF PROPOSED HICKORY AVENUE EXTENDED; ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF PROPOSED HICKORY AVENUE EXTENDED THE FOLLOWING: THENCE N 00°03'42" E 50.01 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 44025'50" W 28.53 FEET TO A POINT; 35 ACRES PARCEL THENCE N 00003'42" E 712.37 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 44051'22" E 28.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF PINE AVENUE; ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF PINE AVENUE THE FOLLOWING: THENCE N 89039'03" E 1243.25 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 87016'31" E 209.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N 89039'03" E 392.91 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S 45°16'30" E 28.25 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION, THIS PARCEL CONTAINING 35.344 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THIS PARCEL IS SUBJECT TO ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. 44 MICHAEL E. MARKS, PLS NO. 4998 35 ACRES PARCEL 0 • =rrc wZ.r W oaaaw O < F O O baa K�� U N jY <� m O amu , z OR S• � � mm s wa Z zv,a�aa dVb aFTarc�om�w `{,,��,, o0 i xU rc o a z a &aha o� Ec O Oia OF a�+ F=��Fw� 8d > j MR Z. p3 ¢ vwi z WWWaaz°.0 m CJI w° uwi§ ¢ a w U U7�rNw TF vi y i oa N m r rc LL azrcao$� o N ?W W�.V'. D: • o a���oF j I o z qn Z � ;mi O W K II i w Ow O `zcS'�mo r I =UNI TZVIWOJ OV u I O O N 2�Wp O U 2FO v�� W 0 r Oli/ K i N aLl at(`WVyI w rc `iW�,� o K W ZZ 30 PO Y' 0 W O Z a u g 3 3 w < z 0 N cFis Wz �n MM 19 0• 0. O o O Z 7�••' oop e M J - b NO x ZfC avom 31OV3 'N r^ Pd rnn r rc� a Z wQ 8<� z rao ONIUV38 Jo SISys— — Om — — w —.— N N .o ..4Z'Os92 M .LO.ZO.lO S n V)— o I e 0 5 z m — _ — — — — exe �125 O1ZaL0 S — — --n m o` = s 01 M yl 2 IIII o ( w11 op = IIII � O O I o l _ gig < I jI I a F w of i ` IIII a z Z pia^ol I n �� '" VIII F ba v }• mNol I`II \ �m IIII mi LJ I � % • • ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID NAVARRO AMOUNT 13.00 Z BOISE IDAHO 10122110 04:40PM DEPUTY Jennings RECORDED -REQUEST OF IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIQIpIN11oil 11111111 ® �I,P i a n e e ffi� i e k PIONEER TITLE COMPANY OF 110099738 GOING OEYONO 8151 W. Rifleman Street f Boise Idaho 937041(208)377-2700 READ AND APPROVED BY 314196 WARRANTY DEED For Value Received DMH Investments, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company hereinnRer referred to as Grantor, -docs hereby gmm, bargain, sell, warrant and convey unto H.O.T. 1, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company hereinafter referred to as Grantee, what* current address is 387 E. Lonark Street, Meridian, id 83642 Ole following described premises, to -wit: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOP. To HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantae(a), and Gruntees(s) heirs and assigns forever. Aud. the said Grantor(s) does (do) hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee(s), the Grantor(s) !stare lhe•awner(s) in foe simple of said premises; that said premises are fee from all encumbrances EXCEPT those to which this conveyance is expressly made subject and those made, suffered or done lay the Oranlae(s); and subject to U.S. Patent reservations, restrictions, dedications, easements, rlghts'of way and agreements, (if any) of retard, and current years taxes, levies, and assessments, includes irrigation and utility assessments, (if any) which are not -yet due and payable, and that Grantor(s) will warrant and defend the same from all lawtbl claims whatsoever. Dated: October 21, 2010 DMB lnvesuraots, LLC By: Dennis M. Baker, Manager STATE yyOFIdaho, County of Ado, ss On thl-ovaFI�y of October, in the year of 2010, before me the undersigned, a notary public, personally appeared Domtis K Baker, known or identified to be one oftha membar(s)1managers) Ina limited liability company, of DMS Investments, LLC and the member(s)lmaneger(s) who subscribed said limited liability company name to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to m@ that he/shrJtfiey executed the same in said limited liability company name, i :r>+e c� r �' NotaryPubtcofldnhc P `G Residing at,J/� �► f �- Commission oxplres:IeA�Il QJ/ i CELT A A parcel ofland being n portion of the SH % of Section 8, Township 3 North, Rage 1 Bost of Uhe Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast comer of the Southeast'/ (East %, comer} of Section B, Township 3 North, Mange I East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, Thence South 01102107" West 83.97 feet along the East lino of the Southeast 1/4 of sold Section 8 to a point; thence North BB°57'53" West 70.00 feet in the intersection of the South Right of Way of Pine Avenue and the West Right of Way of Eagle Road, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Along the West Right of Way of Eagle Road the following: thence South 01°02107" West 738.04 feet to a point; thence South 71°10'34" West 74.43 feet to upoint; thence South 01°02'0T' West SO.00 feet to a point; thence South 69131100" East 13.77 feet to a polut; leaving the West flight of Way of P,agle Road: thence Nardi 88°55'23" West 1795.14 feet to a point on the Fast Rigbt of Way o€proposed Hickory Avenue Extended, thence alongthe East Right of Way ofproposed Hickory Avenue Extended the following: North 00°03142" But 50.01 feat to a point•, thence North 44°25150" West 26.53 feet to &point, thence Nara 00°03142" East 712.37 feet to a point; thence North 4415I122" East 28.39 feat to a point on the South Right of Way of fte Avenue, thence along the South Right of Way of Pine Avenue the following: North B9039103" East 1243.25 feet to a point; thence South 87°16'31" East 209,78 feet to it pointe thence North 89°39'03" Last 392,91 feet to a point; thence South 45°16130" East 28.25 That to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, 0 • AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO ) COUNTY OF ADA ) Orv'i Ile TJL0VLJ �©ys t') (name) (address) (city) (state) being first duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to: (name) (address) to submit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). Dated this 1 day of N UYc 20 -LLL_ U ( ature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. CC(Notary u li daho) Residing at: -Z -1 � My Commission Expires: 1 h? � D/� • • CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Project/Subdivislon City Staff: Location: -. P -q -1b Comprehensive Plan Future Land Usd'Map Designation: Mixed or -e- - ge(Qsrta-i Size of Property: 3s. 3S a_cxer Proposed Use: wag4sure , v :ce%o riny`, Mfbrcr. c Proosed Zoning: -- Existing Use: U ° Existing Zoning: G- G`► Surrounding Uses: Street Buffer(s) and/or Land Use Buffer(s): Open Space/Amenities/Pathways: Access/Stub Streets/Street System: Sewer & Water Service: Topography/HydrologylFloodplain Issues: Canals/Ditches/Irrigation/Hazards: History:.RZ-o�-ooco� cmc-soosa; ��T �a-oo�•i nE�-ro-��-� Pinehri�a.P &g0 01 PP -01-001 Additional Meetinq Notes: PA --w- 1V9= kg3. _ ` K.- 13 . 13 Other Agencies/Departments to Contact: ❑ Ada County Highway District ❑ Nampa Meridian Irrigation District ❑ Public Works Department ❑ Idaho Transportation Department ❑ Settler's Irrigation District ❑ Building Department ❑ Sanitary Services Company ❑ Police Department ❑ Parks Department ❑ Central District Health Department ❑ Fire Department ❑ Other. Application(s) Required: ❑ Administrative Design Review ❑ Alternative Compliance ❑ Annexation ❑ City Council Review ❑ Comprehensive Pian Amendment- Map ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Text ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Conditional Use Permit Modification/Transfer [�] Development Agreement Modification ❑ Final Plat ❑ Final Plat Modification. ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ Private Street, ❑ Short Plat '❑ Time Extension -Council ❑ UDC Text Amendment ❑ Vacation ErVariance ❑ Other Notes; 1) Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting in accord wifh UDC 11 -5A -5C prior to submittal of an application requiring a public hearing (except for a vacation or short plat); and 2) A# applicants forpermits requiring a public hearing shall post the site with a public hearing notice in accord with UDC 11 -5A -5D.3 (except for UDC text amendments, Comp Plan text amendments, and vacations). The'informafion provided during this meeting is based on current UDC requirements and the Comprehensive Plan. Any subsequent changes to the UDC and/or Comp Plan may affect your submittal and/or application. This pre -application reefing shall be valid for four (4) months. 544M c aro txo Z> 0 O L aA Z uLI Q z 0 LU z a COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY POSTING Per Unified Development Code (UDC) 11 -5A -5D, the applicant for all applications requiring a public hearing (except for a UDC text amendment, a Comprehensive Plan text amendment and/or vacations) shall post the subject property not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The applicant shall post a copy of the public hearing notice of the application(s) on the property under consideration. The applicant shall submit proof of property posting in the form of a notarized statement and a photograph of the posting to the City no later than seven (7) days prior to the public hearing attesting to where and when the sign(s) were posted. Unless such Certificate is received by the required date, the hearing will be continued. The sign(s) shall be removed no later than three (3) days after the end of the public hearing for which the sign(s) had been posted. 1 am aware of the above requirements and will comply with the posting requirements as stated in UDC 11-5A-5. AJpplicant/agent sign a Date ITD2109 (Rev.06-10) Right -Olay Encroachment Applicatiolr4d Permit itd.idaho.gov. Approaches and Other Encroachments Project Number {From ITD Highway Plan) Appllcalion Date Number of Encroachments Permit Number Route Segment CIL Milepost C/L Station ' srls� Access Control Type Cf -v) O.2dOS /.2.5"wl Right ❑ Left r] ., , 3 Right ❑ Left ® � v City and/or County Township; Range; Section Roadway T A y ype (Urban, Rural)=NumberofLane—s /`'fer�'a1iGh Median Type (Raised, Painted, etc.) Traffic impact Study Required Appraisal Required Application Fee Inspection Fee (if Req'd) Performance Bond (If Req'd) ❑ 6 $ $ New approach I Existing Approach Mod cations (Select all that apply) Appr ❑ Location ❑ Width ❑ Use ❑ Approach Type: SF Residential ❑ MF Residential ❑ V Distance From Nearest Approach (both directions, both sides of roadway) - oii'rl e v 'Vo ' e 'Ar 00"i rat./ cL Sight Distance CL >, attach additional sections on Page 3 :h Width (without Flares) Culvert (if Required) f —ya ' Length Diameter Commercial ® Agricultural ❑ Joint Use ❑ ow on Plan Approach Volume ]Vehicle Trips Per Day Q Right {ft) Left (ft) Posted Speed Latitude Longitude Elevation (ft) Remarks (Attach additional sheets if needed) Other Specify Type (i.e.: Encroachments Turnout, Include the following: 1. A completed Encroachment Checklist, applicable ownership documents, multiple approach permit sheets. 2. Written authorization from the owner or signature of joint user (when required). 3. Plans or drawings (3 sets) showing proposed work, approach locations, drainage details, landscaping, striping plans, and traffic control. (include department roadway alignment or project plans when available.) 4. Special Provisions, Traffic Control Plans, Environmental documents and any other required permits. I certify that 1 am the owner or authorized representative of the property to be served and request permission to construct the above facilities within the State Highway Rights -of -Way in accordance with the general provisions specified on page 2 of this form and any special provisions or plans made a part of this permit. I further certify that I have obtained and provided a copy to the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) of all other required governmental approval to perform the work authorized under this permit. I further understand that this permit shall be void if all work has not been completed within one year of permit issuance and a final inspection and approval from ITD has not been obtained. Owner's Name (Printed) Address H.O.T. 1, LLC city state zip 3698 E. Lanark Meridian l dwn ,+,��o ID 183642 rtt • ------ rnx ryumoar -888- ' 208-855-0617 208-888-4306 Auth 'ze fteprese afive or Joint User (Printed) Address Phillip E. Broadbent city state zip 3698 E. Lanark Meridian ID 83642 Authorized Representative or Joint User's Signature Phone Number J208-88:8�4306 x Nu 208-855-0617 Subject to all terms, conditions, and provisions shown on this form or attachments, permission is hereby granted to the above- named applicant to perform the work described. Local Government A royal When Required Department A royal Signature Title Date Sign ue Date Note: Permit will be considered Temporary until final inspection and approval by a department representative. COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY POSTING Per Unified Development Code (UDC) 11 -5A -5D, the applicant for all applications requiring a public hearing (except for a UDC text amendment, a Comprehensive Plan text amendment and/or vacations) shall post the subject property not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The applicant shall post a copy of the public hearing notice of the application(s) on the property under consideration. The applicant shall submit proof of property posting in the form of a notarized statement and a photograph of the posting to the City no later than seven (7) days prior to the public hearing attesting to where and when the sign(s) were posted. Unless such Certificate is received by the required date, the hearing will be continued. The sign(s) shall be removed no later than three (3) days after the end of the public hearing for which the sign(s) had been posted. I am aware of the above requirements and will comply with the posting requirements as stated in UDC 11-5A-5. 11-1-7-10 A1pplicant/agent sign u Date DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. O.T. 1, LLC, Owner/DeveloperDekted: DMB Investments THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this day of , 2010, by atVd between City of Meridiana municipal" -- Deleted: o8 corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY, and H.O.T. 1, JLC, whose address is " Deleted: DMB Investments 3698 E. Lanark, Meridian, Idaho 83642 hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER. __ Deleted: sso S. Beechwood suite 120, ------------------ ----- Boise Deleted: 83709 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer is the sole owner, in law and/4"-"- Deleted: or equity, of that certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit A for each owner, which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code,__§ 67-6511A rovides that cities may, b _ -- Deleted:l.c. - - y, y, ordinance, require or permit as a condition of re -zoning that the ' Deleted: Idaho Code, Owner/Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Ordinance 11-513-3, which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re -zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner eveloper has submitted an application for a_"- De: Modification to Development Agreement dated 2-28-08 instrument #108022893 and Deleted: annexation and zoning ofthe — -"" Property's described in Exhibit A, and has requested a designation of C -G (Genual 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public Commercial), (Municipal Cade of the City hearin&Jbefore the Meridian City Council, as to how the subject_ of Meridian) ----------------------- ------------------------- -- Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and Deleted` s Deleted: both before the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 1 OF 10 1.6 WHEREAS, record of the proceedings for the requested development agreement modification for the subject Prgperty held before_the_City- - Dekted: annexation and zoning Council_ include responses of government subdivisions providing designation of 1 g- - --------- p g services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and received Dem: the Planning & Zoning further testimony and comment; and Commission, and subsequently before 1.7 WHEREAS, City Council, the,day o_. has approved certain Findings; --- Deleted: T" of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order, set forth in ' Dekted: November Exhibit B, which are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated Dekted: 2007 herein as if set forth in full, hereinafter referred to as (the Findings); and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to modify the existing development agreement to reflect the change in ownership; and , Dekted: enter into a development agreement before the City Council takes final action on annexation and zoning 1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Develover-deems it to be inits best interest to be designation able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this'; Deleted:OWNERMEVELOPER Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at 'tis urging and requests= Deleted: their and fiwmatted: Font: Bold Deleted: then 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this development agreement, herein being established in acgordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of - , Deleted: as a result of evidence received -------------------------------- - by the City in the proceedings for zoning the City of Meridian adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382, designation from government subdivisions and the Zoning and Development Ordinances codified in Meridian providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property Unified Development Code, Title 11. owners and to ensure re -zoning designation is NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 2 OF 10 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal Corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers toI O.T. 1 LLC, whose_------( Dem: DMB Investments address is 3689 4. -L - anark, Meridian, Idaho 83642 the party that owns------- Deleted: 250S. Beechwood, Ste. 120, and is developing aid Property and shall include any subsequent Boise' Idaho 83709 owner(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit A describing the parcel currently zoned C -G _(General Commercial), Deleted: s attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth Deleted: to be annexed and at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under City's Zoning Ordinance codified at Meridian Unified Development Code § 11-213-2 which are herein specified as follows: Construction and development of,,35+Aacres in theproposed _C--G-zone------ Deleted: 61 building lots and 11 - - - - - - - pertinent to the _ applications. - ---------------------------------- -- common lots on 170 - DeletCd: AZ -07--006 and RZ-07-010 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: 1. Development of the property shall substantially comply with the - conceptual site plan and elevation submitted with the subject application i r and the concepts outlined below. R------------------------------------ ------ ' DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 3 OF 10 Deleted: 2.. Pine Street shall be extended to Locust Grove prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for buildings that would requite access to Pine Avenue. Deleted: I 3.. Where there are existing utilities and where the surrounding public mads are fixed, the developer shall be allowed up to 7 occupancy permits prior to final plat recordation. The Planning Director and the Development Services Manager of the City of Meridian may consider allowing additional occupancy permits (not to exceed 13) if the administration of the previous 7 seems to be efficient and in the City's best interest.¶ 4. The following concepts shall be employed in the development of the J Deleted: preliminary plat and property: (Deleted: Stanley Consultants a. General massing of buildings, roundabouts and landscape islands in i ;' Deleted: 3-5-07 streets shall be constructed as generally shown on theconceptual -site,;' Dem: c.. structures shall be built plan prepared by tCTAt Inert dated 1�1 12-10. ;-' adjacent to roadways with a majority of the ----------------------------------------------- rking to b. Pedestrian connections shall be constructed between buildings in the �uctur s. the rear and sides of the g structures.¶ form of pathways distinguished from vehicular driving surfaces De: d through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks; Dem: office/retail portion of the Common areas with site amenities 1.e. lazas/court _ ds 'Ac� ---------------- (. - � p � - '' ,; ,. Deleted: and will be required in the multi - water features, picnic areas, flower gardens, public art, etc. are q P $ P � fatuity portion of the development. encouraged to be included within the development. e___________--------__-- Deleted:e. - structures should be oriented Exterior buildingwalls should demonstrate the,- toward each other or the adjacent streets) if r ' v Exterior r, there is nopaddnginthe front ofthe ri appearance of high quality mateals of stone, brick, wood, or othe>•;,' ., buil ;1 native materials (acceptable materials include tinted or textured'`,'`, Dem: f. Windows, awnings, or masonry block, � textured_or painted architectural concrete panels, or `, `, arcades totaling at least 30% of the length of facades stucco or stucco like synthetic materials„ Smooth faced concrete block the fagade should be provided for that are viewable from other structures;¶ tilt -up concrete panels, or prefabricated steel panels are acceptable', with the addition of paint and/or high quality accent materials. Deleted: g.. Provide walkways at least 8 feet in width for any aisle length that is greater than 150spaces or 200 feet c._ The building_ design- shall_ incorporate_ at _least_ 2- changes in one -or -a away from the mainuilding entrance;¶ combination of the following: color, texture and materials; 1. Rooflines shall demonstrate 2 or more of the followingoverhan m Deleted: h -------------------------------------------------------- --- --'-- ---------g-$ `` `` '', eaves, sloped roofs, two or more roof planes, varying parapet heights;`, ``, Deleted: texwred masonry block, and cornices; Deleted: coated rg. The _primary _building_ entrances--shall-be clearly --defined -by- -the `, `,'`, Deleted: - s architectural design of the building. Deleted: prohibited except as ,h. J3uildings will be constructed in the order they are eg nerally listed on Dem: i the conceptual site plan (A, B, C, etc. De: j i. Building "A" is an accessory use within the current zoning designation Dem: k and will be permitted to be constructed prior to other principally'`, Deleted:l permitted structures (B or Caper this agreement. Delete: A Conditional Use Permit for the j. The construction of either building B or C will commence with 39 multi -family portion of this development months of completing the previous building_ shall be submitted prior to submitting for final plat approval on that area. 6. COMPLIANCE PERIOD/CONSENT TO REZONE: This Agreement and `, Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.W, the commitments contained herein shall be terminated, and the zoning designation reversed, `,, Hanging: 0.13^, Numbered + Level: upon,an actual g showin of default, as determined b a court of com etent 'urisdiction, of the 1 + Numbering Style: i, ii, iii,... + x Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Owner/Developer or Owners/Developers heirs, successors, assigns, to comply with Section 5'`. Aligned at: 1.94^ + Tab after: 0° + entitled "Conditions Governing Development of Subject Property" of this agreement within Indent at: 2.44^ two years of the date this Agreement is effective, and after the City has complied with the Formatted: Indent: Hanging: 0.13^ Deleted: a DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 4 OF 10 notice and hearing procedures as outlined in Idaho Code § 67-6509, or any subsequent amendments or re -codifications thereof. 7. CONSENT TO DE -ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: Owner/Developer consents upon an actual showing of default as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to the reversal of the zoning designation of the Property subject to and conditioned upon the following conditions precedent to -wit: 7.1 That the City provide written notice of any failure to comply with this Agreement to Owner/Developer and if the Owner/Developer fails to cure such failure within six (6) months of such notice. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Development. 9. DEFAULT: 9.1 In the event Owner/Developer, or Owner/Developer's heirs, successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property, fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property and a court of competent jurisdiction rules that Owner/Developer is in default hereof, this Agreement may be modified or terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 9.2 A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the breach and breaches waived and shall not bar any other rights or remedies of City or apply to any subsequent breach of any such or other covenants and conditions. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 5 OF 10 • • 10. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record either a memorandum of this Agreement or this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, at Owner/Developer's cost, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer_- - 11. ZONING: ,The current zoning of C -G (General Commercial) shall remain. 12. REMEDIES: This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction by either City or Owner/Developer, or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. 12.1 In the event of a material breach of this Agreement, the parties agree that City and Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days after delivery of notice of said breach to correct the same prior to the non - breaching party's seeking of any remedy provided for herein; provided, however, that in the case of any such default which cannot with diligence be cured within such thirty (30) day period, if the defaulting party shall commence to cure the same within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter shall prosecute the curing of same with diligence and continuity, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 12.2 In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes which are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 13. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may require irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check as allowed under Meridian City Code Section 11-5-C, to insure installation of any unfinished improvements that are not in conflict with Section 15 of this Agreement. At the City's sole discretion the Owner/Developer agrees to provide surety in the form as required by the City, if necessary. Deleted: , prior to the third reading of the Meridian zoning Ordinance in connection with the re -zoning of the Property by the CityCouncil. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement.¶ Deleted: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 14. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: The Owner/Developer agrees that no Deleted: until all improvements are Certificates of Occupancy will be issued �n any_pase in which the improvements have not, ' completed, unless the City and Developer/Owner has entered into an been installed, completed, and accepted by the City or otherwise entered into an approved addendum agreement stating when the letter of credit for unfinished improvements. improvements will be completed in a phased developed, and in any event, no Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 6 OF 10 0 • 15. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Property shall be subject to de - annexation if the owner or his assigns, heirs, or successors shall not meet the conditions contained in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this Development Agreement, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 16. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: c/o City Engineer City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 with copy to: OWNER/DEVELOPER: R.O.T. 1, LLC 698 E. Lanark -_ eridian, ID X3642 ----- --------- City Clerk Phillip E. Broadbent City of Meridian Scentsy, Inc. 33 E. Idaho Avenue 3698 E. Lanark Meridian, ID 83642 Meridian, ID 83642 Deleted: DMB Investments { Deleted: 250 S. Beechwood, Suite 120 = Deleted: Boise Deleted: 83709 16.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 17. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 18. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 7 OF 10 constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 19. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer of the Property, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner/Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owner/Developer has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. 20. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 21. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 21.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing re -zoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective on the datepf execution of the Mayor and CityClerk. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 8 OF 10 DeMted: the Meridian City Council shall adopt the amendment to the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property and ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER B.O.T. 12 LLC Deleted: DMB INVESTMENTS IM CITY OF MERIDIAN IM ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 9 OF 10 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss County of Ada, On this day of ,20 1 0, before me, the undersigned,,._.- Deleted: 2008 a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared known or identified to me to be the of.H. O.T. 1,- LLC,- acknowledged_ tome that he executed,__.- Deleted: DMB Investments the same on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: My Commission Expires: On this day of 2008, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and William G. Berg, Jr., know or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: Commission expires: _ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (AZ 07-006 & RZ 07-010) PINEBRIDGE SUBDIVISION PAGE 10 OF 10 12 • st ijk, -AIL -l- $ 0 i C (I I o '< n m �x EAyyy y4 41 �O �01 W z II z � • I I PINE STREET J r — — — — — a � +1 +1 b i it t II ® 7 I I of t , II II m m D D WN ;rC m CAoCn II4j 4 \ cz o m 4001 200 q 275 m 200- 250 I z m 350 h i� o c/) 000 II I c m O I z , I� IID COMMERCIAL COURT II � i 88+18.37 Q z I o z m �x rri ' �01 z � 0 • I I PINE STREET J r — — — — — a � +1 +1 b i it t II ® 7 I I of t , II II m m D D WN ;rC m CAoCn II4j 4 \ cz o m 4001 200 q 275 m 200- 250 I z m 350 h i� o c/) 000 II I c m O I z , I� IID COMMERCIAL COURT II � i 88+18.37 f1 • TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: November 17, 2010 TO: CTA Inc. 1 l85 W. Grove Street Boise, Idaho 83702 FROM: Gary Funkhouser, Chhang Ream Stanley consultants, Inc. PROJECT: Scentsy Business Campus SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis With RIRO on Eagle Road INTRODUCTION Stanley Consultants has been retained to prepare a traffic analysis for Scentsy Business Campus (SBC) located at the southwest corner of Eagle Road and Pine Avenue in Meridian, Idaho. Figure 1 shows the site area bounded by Pine Avenue to the north, Eagle Road to the east, Union Pacific Railroad to the south and the proposed Hickory Road extension to the west. The SBC site is a part of the overall Pinebridge Subdivision, which is an approved 170 -acre mixed use development located south of Fairview Avenue between Eagle Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic impact studies for Pinebridge Subdivision were prepared by Funkhouser Engineering in 2004 and revised by Dobie Engineering in 2005. The latest traffic impact study update for Pinebridge Subdivision was prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. in 2006. The 2006 update study did not consider or evaluate the traffic impacts with a Right-In/Right-Out (RIRO) access on Eagle Road located between Pine Avenue and Commercial Court. Dobie Engineering, Inc. provided additional traffic analysis with and without a RIRO on Eagle Road to meet Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) access issues and application in 2007. The purpose of this traffic analysis is to re-evaluate the traffic impacts with and without a RIRO access on Eagle Road to reflect the revised land use in the SBC site. The analysis year and period is 2015 PM peak hour to be consistent with the previous studies. The study area will be focused on Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection with and without the RIRO access. Traffic projection from previous studies will be utilized in this traffic analysis. Please refer to these studies for fiirther details, background, and findings. Q:123213103-Planning101-DocIO5-Tecluticcal ReporlslTrqffic S1ndiesWo6Scen1sy-TA-R1R0 1111712010 Stanley t'onsdtarKs.K .J� Figure 1— Scentsy Business Campus l k Union Pacific Railroad PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The SBC site is bounded by Pine Avenue to the north, Eagle Road to the east, Union Pacific Railroad to the south and the proposed Hickory Road extension to the west. The SBC site and boundary has not changed since the last traffic impact study update. However, the land use and total building area have changed slightly. Based on the current conceptual site plan, the SBC site is estimated to contain approximately 468,500 square feet of flex -type business park land use. Total land use assumed in previous study for the same area was 520,000 square feet of office uses and 56,000 square feet of retail use. The proposed site access remains the same as shown in Figure 1. Traffic projection and analysis will be based on the current SBC site plan and proposed land use. Q;123213103-Planning101-DocV 05-Techrniccal Reports ITraf c Snldies00C Scenln'-T4-R1R0 11/1712010 Qb Stanley Consuftmds .� 2 TRAFFIC PROJECTION Table 1 summarizes and compares trip generation for the SBC site between the current land use and previous land use. The current SBC site is projected to generate approximately 6,000 vehicles per day (vpd) and approximately 600 vehicles per hour (vph) during the PM peak hour, which are approximately 30% less daily trips and approximately 40% less trips during the PM peak hour compared to the previous site plan for the same area. Overall, Pinebridge Subdivision is projected to generate approximately 8% fewer trips with the changes in the land use proposed in the SBC site. Site traffic distribution and assignment were based on previous studies with and without the RIRO access on Eagle Road. Figure 2 summarizes the 2015 PM peak hour total traffic projection at Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection without the RIRO access on Eagle Road. Figure 3 summarizes the 2015 PM peak hour total traffic projection at Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection with the RIRO access on Eagle Road. The RIRO would provide alternative site access and will reduce traffic at Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection by approximately I% during the PM peak hour. Table 1— Trip Generation Summary Gross Trip Generation Proposed Land ITE Land Use Use Code quantity Units ADT AM PM Previous Pinebridge Subdivision Site Plan Office Park 750 520,000 SF (1000) 5,938 889 770 Shopping Center 820 56,000 SF (1000) 2,405 56 209 Total 8,343 945 978 Current SBC Site Plan Business Park 770 468,500 SF (1000) 5,978 670 604 Difference -2,365 -275 -374 Q.- U3213103-Planningl01-DocI05-Teclnllccal ReporislTraffic SludiesWoctscenis),T4-R1R0 11/1712010 Stanley Consonants .K Figure 2 — 2015 PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Projection at Eagle Rd & Pine Ave (Without RIRO Access on Eagle Rd) Pine Ave 1617 673 Eagle Rd 4522 1750 272 � ff r 201 1324 r 225 372 2125 275 i\OM n f-1 i 201 275 192 ---- -- 1------- <= 192 - 6 2804-- - - -� i� �•-;._ 250 �'� �• i� , �• \•/ '� � 225 r 372 —•—.. �• �i �-... ------ i it 944 r 192 ;------- a-------- '----------► 192 i j Lr 380 ; 200 380 1324 250 r 280 x2125 r 200 �y -.1 \.- J 1954 2605 4559 Eagle Rd Q:123213103-Planting101-Doc105-TechniccalReporlslTraffic Shidiest Doc&enisp-TA-RIRO 11/17/2010 Stanley LUIOS .K Pine Ave 717- 1334 617 1� Figure 3 — 2015 PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Projection at Eagle Rd & Pine Ave (With RIRO Access on Eagle Rd) Eagle Rd 4522 A 1750 27?2 162 �13� 63 2 5 372(-22112`5--217S �02M 1 Pine Ave j Pine Ave 162 ; 275 634 1924-- ------ ---- - ' � 1-------,<= 192 717 \1 i 2804- -• �� �� �•Y.— 250 1 Y 532 1334 i� 225 372 —.�• \� �., 1--- -•_•_•♦ i /1 898 192 �'---'!- i-------- ----------► 192 617 r 334 200 + 334 1363 250 r 280 '2125 r 200 1947 2605 4552 Eagle Rd Q.123213103-Planning101-Doc105-TechniccnlReporislTrafcShudiesI DociScenl p-TA-MR0 1111712010 Stanley �AIKUItafitS rc TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Eagle Road & Pine Avenue Intersection The intersection of Eagle Road and Pine Avenue was evaluated for traffic impacts with and without the RIRO access on Eagle Road using 2015 PM Peak hour total traffic conditions. Detail analysis worksheets are attached. Table 1 represents a summary of the intersection performance comparison. Without the RIRO access, the intersection is projected to operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour. The RIRO access would reduce traffic at the intersection decreasing the overall delay, total vehicle miles travelled, fuel consumption, and emissions. With the RIRO access, the intersection is projected to operate at LOS E with a slightly lower average delay. Focusing on the eastbound approach on Pine Avenue, the RIRO access would reduce the right -turn traffic by approximately 46 vph (12%) during the PM peak hour, which will result in queue length reduction and is expected to improve the overall site circulation. Table 1— Eagle Rd & Pine Ave Intersection LOS Summary Without RIRO With RIRO Total Total The crash history at Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection was obtained from Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) and reviewed. Table 1 summarizes crash data at the intersection for the most recent five-year period (2005 — 2009). A total of 58 crashes were reported, 23 resulted in property damage and 35 resulted in injury. No fatalities were reported. Fifty-two (52) of the crashes were rear end crashes. The RIRO access is projected to reduce the total entering traffic at the intersection by approximately 46 vph during the PM peak hour, which will reduces the number of conflicts and likelihood for a potential crash. Table 2 — Crash Data at Eagle Rd & Pine Ave Intersection (2005-2009) # of Year Accidents 2005 9 2006 10 2007 19 2008 10 2009 10 Total 58 Q:123113103-P1a)nning101-Doc105-Teciniiccal ReporlsiTrq6ricStud1es11Doc1.Scentsy-Ti1-R1R0 11/17/1010 Stanley Consultants.. Entering Delay Entering Delay Eagle Rd & Pine Ave Traffic (s/veh) LOS Traffic (s/veh) LOS Intersection 6016 81.4 F 5970 79.5 E EB Approach 944 123.6 F 898 122.2 F EB Right -turn 380 112.2 F 334 105.8 F The crash history at Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection was obtained from Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) and reviewed. Table 1 summarizes crash data at the intersection for the most recent five-year period (2005 — 2009). A total of 58 crashes were reported, 23 resulted in property damage and 35 resulted in injury. No fatalities were reported. Fifty-two (52) of the crashes were rear end crashes. The RIRO access is projected to reduce the total entering traffic at the intersection by approximately 46 vph during the PM peak hour, which will reduces the number of conflicts and likelihood for a potential crash. Table 2 — Crash Data at Eagle Rd & Pine Ave Intersection (2005-2009) # of Year Accidents 2005 9 2006 10 2007 19 2008 10 2009 10 Total 58 Q:123113103-P1a)nning101-Doc105-Teciniiccal ReporlsiTrq6ricStud1es11Doc1.Scentsy-Ti1-R1R0 11/17/1010 Stanley Consultants.. • RIRO The RIRO access on Eagle Road was approved by ITD to be centered between Pine Avenue and Commercial Court (Encroachment Permit 3-11-135). The RIRO access will be designed, channelized, and signed to allow only right -ins and right -outs as detailed in the encroachment permit. A right -turn deceleration lane is required on the southbound approach. This deceleration lane would remove southbound right -turn traffic from the through traffic reducing the conflicts and speed differences in the main travel way on Eagle Road. Right -ins at the RIRO are projected to operate with minimal delays. Right -outs are projected to operate at LOS C. Based on the conceptual SBC site layout, the RIRO driveway extends approximately 300 feet straight into the site without blockage. Parking, unparking, and internal circulation are not projected to impact the operation at the RIRO. SUMMARY The traffic analysis for SBC site concludes the followings: • The SBC site is bounded by Pine Avenue to the north, Eagle Road to the east, Commercial Court to the south and the proposed Hickory Road extension to the west and is a part of the overall approved Pinebridge Subdivision. • SBC is estimated to contain approximately 468,500 square feet of flex -type business park land use. • SBC is projected to generate approximately 6,000 vpd, 670 vph during AM peak hour, and 600 vph during PM peak hour. • SBC is utilizing the proposed accesses on Pine Avenue, on Commercial Court, and a RIRO access on Eagle Road. • The RIRO access on Eagle Road was approved by ITD to be centered between Pine Avenue and Commercial Court (Encroachment Permit 03-11-135). o The RIRO access will be designed, channelized, and signed to allow only right -ins and right -outs as detailed in the encroachment permit. o A right -turn deceleration lane is required on the southbound approach. o Right -ins are projected to operate with minimal delays under 2015 PM peak hour total traffic conditions. o Right -outs are projected to operate at LOS C under 2015 PM peak hour total traffic conditions. Q:A23213V03-Planning\01-DocA05-Technicca1 Reports\Traffic Studies\\DocAScentsy-TA-RIRO 11117/2010 ® 7 Stanley Consultants . < • A total of 58 crashes were reported at the Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection for the most recent five-year period (2005-2009). 0 23 crashes resulted in property damage and 35 resulted in injury. a 52 of the crashes were rear end crashes. • The Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection is projected to operate at capacity at LOS F with an average delay of 81.4 seconds per vehicles using 2015 PM peak hour total traffic conditions. The RIRO access would reduce traffic at Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection and improve the overall operation, safety, and site circulation. o The RIRO would provide alternative site access and will reduce traffic at Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection by approximately 46 vph (1%) during the PM peak hour. ■ The traffic reduction will result in lower vehicle miles travelled, fuel consumption, and emissions; and reduce the likelihood for a potential crash. ■ The Eagle Road and Pine Avenue intersection is projected operate at LOS E with a slightly lower delay. o The RIRO access is projected to reduce the right -turn traffic on the eastbound approach on Pine Avenue by approximately 46 vph (12%) during the PM peak hour ■ This traffic reduction will result in shorter queue length on the eastbound approach and is expected to improve the overall site circulation. Q;123213103-Pln�rning101-Doc105-Techeticrnl ReporlslTrgUc StudresI Doc&enIsy-TA-RIRO 1111712010 Stanley Co�tltards.� U ATTACHMENT Q:123213103-PlaintIttg101-Doc10S-TechniccalReporeslTrq icSetdtesllDoclScenlsy-TA-R1RO 1111712010 Stanley Consultants .r • • Synchro LOS Worksheet • 2015 PM Peak Hour Total Traffic 24: Pine Ave & Eagle Rd X04 F.15T EBA ._WBL WBT With RIRO Lane Configurations tt r �'� tt rr tt r tt rr Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 300 100 300 300 300 300 300 250 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (prot) 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 3502 3406 1615 3502 3406 1615 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3502 3610 1548 3502 3610 1548 3502 3406 1548 3502 3406 1548 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 132 90 109 104 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 50 50 Link Distance (ft) 3190 1690 460 475 Travel Time (s) 62.1 32.9 6.3 6.5 Volume (vph) 372 192 334 250 192 275 280 2125 200 225 1363 162 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 6% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 413 213 371 278 213 306 311 2361 222 250 1514 180 Lane Group Flow (vph) 413 213 371 278 213 306 311 2361 222 250 1514 180 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Detector Phases 5 2 2 1 6 6 3 8 8 7 4 4 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 25.0 25.0 9.0 25.0 25.0 10.0 26.0 26.0 10.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 36.0 36.0 20.0 31.0 31.0 26.0 127.0 127.0 17.0 118.0 118.0 Total Split (%) 12.5% 18.0% 18.0% 10.0% 15.5% 15.5% 13.0% 63.5% 63.5% 8.5% 59.0% 59.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C -Max C -Max None C -Max C -Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 21.0 32.0 32.0 16.0 27.0 27.0 21.6 123.0 123.0 13.0 114.4 114.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.62 0.62 0.06 0.57 0.57 Scentsy Business Campus 11/17/2010 Stanley Consultants, Inc. 2015 PM Peak Hour Total Traffic With RIRO 24: Pine Ave & Eagle Rd Lane Group, EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR v/c Ratio 1.12 0.37 1.03 0.99 0.44 1.07 0.82 1.13 0.22 1.10 0.78 0.19 Control Delay 160.1 77.1 105.8 140.6 82.7 125.4 103.2 75.6 4.0 168.2 36.6 8.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 160.1 77.1 105.8 140.6 82.7 125.4 103.2 75.6 4.0 168.2 36.6 8.9 LOS F E F F F F F E A F D A Approach Delay 122.2 119.3 73.1 51.0 Approach LOS F F E D Stops(vph) 321 169 194 226 174 169 275 921 23 193 1030 32 Fuel Used(gal) 23 9 16 12 7 12 11 53 1 14 44 3 CO Emissions (g/hr) 1615 609 1143 832 481 814 763 3708 77 955 3086 206 NOx Emissions (g/hr) 314 118 222 162 94 158 149 721 15 186 600 40 VOC Emissions (g/hr) 374 141 265 193 112 189 177 859 18 221 715 48 Dilemma Vehicles (#) 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 42 0 0 34 0 Queue Length 50th (ft) -321 134 -368 192 137 -335 220 1864 18 -191 797 44 Queue Length 95th (ft) #443 182 #599 #301 187 #552 m181 m306 m8 #294 890 89 Internal Link Dist (ft) 3110 1610 380 395 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 100 300 300 300 300 300 250 Base Capacity(vph) 368 578 359 280 487 287 385 2095 994 228 1948 930 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.12 0.37 1.03 0.99 0.44 1.07 0.81 1.13 0.22 1.10 0.78 0.19 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 163 (82%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.13 Intersection Signal Delay: 79.5 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 24: Pine Ave & Eagle Rd M KIM IN KMRSINEWS K-11-1=0 &190=1 ; 1 =■ M- ■ t Scentsy Business Campus 11/17/2010 Stanley Consultants, Inc. 2015 PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Without RIRO 24: Pine Ave & Eagle Rd -,* --. -'V 'r '- k- 4% t /00� �► l Arta Group E04 EBT EBR WBL WST WBR NBI. NST NR BBI. B T Lane Configurations tt r tt r tt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 300 100 300 300 300 300 300 250 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 3502 3406 1615 3502 3406 1615 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3502 3610 1548 3502 3610 1548 3502 3406 1548 3502 3406 1548 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 156 82 110 128 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 50 50 Link Distance (ft) 3190 1690 460 475 Travel Time (s) 62.1 32.9 6.3 6.5 Volume (vph) 372 192 380 250 192 275 280 2125 200 225 1324 201 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 6% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 413 213 422 278 213 306 311 2361 222 250 1471 223 Lane Group Flow (vph) 413 213 422 278 213 306 311 2361 222 250 1471 223 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Detector Phases 5 2 2 1 6 6 3 8 8 7 4 4 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 25.0 25.0 9.0 25.0 25.0 10.0 26.0 26.0 10.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 38.0 38.0 18.0 31.0 31.0 29.0 128.0 128.0 16.0 115.0 115.0 Total Split (%) 12.5% 19.0% 19.0% 9.0% 15.5% 15.5% 14.5% 64.0% 64.0% 8.0% 57.5% 57.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C -Max C -Max None C -Max C -Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 21.0 34.0 34.0 14.0 27.0 27.0 23.5 124.0 124.0 12.0 112.5 112.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.62 0.62 0.06 0.56 0.56 Scentsy Business Campus 11/17/2010 Stanley Consultants, Inc. 2015 PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Without RIRO 24: Pine Ave & Eagle Rd --' -► -V r *- 4- 4\ t r �► l bane Group. BBL BBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST _86fj v/c Ratio 1.12 0.35 1.07 1.13 0.44 1.09 0.75 1.12 0.22 1.19 0.77 0.24 Control Delay 160.1 75.1 112.2 175.6 82.7 135.0 102.9 71.0 3.9 196.2 37.4 9.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 160.1 75.1 112.2 175.6 82.7 135.0 102.9 71.0 3.9 196.2 37.4 9.8 LOS F E F F F F F E A F D A Approach Delay 123.6 135.2 69.3 54.6 Approach LOS F F E D Stops(vph) 321 168 213 210 174 173 279 779 23 183 1003 42 Fuel Used(gal) 23 9 19 14 7 12 11 49 1 15 43 4 CO Emissions (g/hr) 1615 602 1331 948 481 854 767 3417 77 1034 3015 260 NOx Emissions (g/hr) 314 117 259 185 94 166 149 665 15 201 587 51 VOC Emissions (g/hr) 374 140 308 220 112 198 178 792 18 240 699 60 Dilemma Vehicles (#) 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 42 0 0 33 0 Queue Length 50th (ft) -321 132 -436 -218 137 -354 220 1852 18 -203 785 58 Queue Length 95th (ft) #443 180 #675 #326 187 #572 m180 m305 m8 #307 878 111 Internal Link Dist (ft) 3110 1610 380 395 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 100 300 300 300 300 300 250 Base Capacity(vph) 368 614 393 245 487 280 438 2112 1002 210 1916 927 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.12 0.35 1.07 1.13 0.44 1.09 0.71 1.12 0.22 1.19 0.77 0.24 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 200 Actuated Cycle Length: 200 Offset: 163 (82%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.19 Intersection Signal Delay: 81.4 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 24: Pine Ave & Eagle Rd Scentsy Business Campus 11/17/2010 Stanley Consultants, Inc. I Scentsy Business Campus 11/17/2010 Stanley Consultants, Inc. RIRO Access 3698 E. Lanark ` Meridian, Idaho 83642 877.855.0617 toll free 201 November 10, 2010 ATTN: Pam Golden, P.E. ITD District 3 P.O. Box 8028 Boise, ID 83707 RE: Permit Number 3-10-190 Dear Mrs. Golden, H.O.T. 1, LLC. recently purchased 35 acres from DMB Investments, LLC. at the south-west corner of State Highway 55 (Eagle Rd) and Pine Ave. in Meridian in order to develop a corporate campus for Scentsy, Inc. A current Right -Of -Way Encroachment Permit (permit #3-10-190) is in DMB Investments' name and we would like to request that the permit be transferred into the name of H.O.T. 1, LLC., the legal owner of the parcel. Please find the signed permit application and a copy of the recorded warranty deed attached. Per our phone conversation, we plan to submit a Request for Variance application to the City of Meridian on November 17th, 2010. As part of this request, we need to include a copy of this permit in H.O.T. 1's name with the variance application. We appreciate your cooperation in this request. Please contact me with any questions or need for additional information. Thank you, t Sam Joh on Facilities Project Manager Scentsy Inc. ITD 2A09 (Rev. 06-10) Right-OlVay Encroachment A Ii pp cation4d Permit itd.idah�o o._v. Approaches and Other Encrnar_tirr anfe- Project Number (From ITD Highway Plan) Application Date Number of Encroachments Permit Number Route iil-IL- Ix Segment CIL Milepost C/t Station Access Control Type � n-�n d 2005' 1.2, 5" yr City Right ❑ Left J f , 3 Right ❑ Left ® Jv and/or County Township; Range; Section Roadway Type (Urban, Ruraq Number of Lanes Median Type (Raised. Painted, etc.) Traffic impact Study Required =AppraisalEApplication Fee 0$ Inspection Fee (Ir Req d) PerfomanceBond pf Req'd) $ M New Approach Existing Approach Modifications ( ❑ Location ❑ Width ❑ Approach Type: SF Residential ❑ Distance From Nearest Approach (both direc o P,•ne fye, Va Coo Q, Sight Distance Q Right (ft) Left (ft) Remarks (Attach additional sheets if neededl Other Specify Type Encroachments 't all that apply) Approach Width Use ❑ 1 "6460, h additional sections on Pag (Without Flares) I Culvert (If Required) MF Residential ❑ Commercial both sides of roadway) — Show on Plan -WI-1-e ra/ ,C A V ;x ' GPS Coordinates Posted Speed I Latitude Turnout, etc.) I Length Diameter Agricultural ❑ Joint Use ❑ Approach Volume Vehicle Trips Per Dav Longitude Elevation (ft) Include the following: 1. A completed Encroachment Checklist, applicable ownership documents, multiple approach permit sheets. 2. Written authorization from the owner or signature of joint user (when required). 3. Plans or drawings (3 sets) showing proposed work, approach locations, drainage details, landscaping, striping plans, and traffic control. (include department roadway alignment or project plans when available.) 4. Special Provisions, Traffic Control Plans, Environmental documents and any other required permits. I certify that 1 am the owner or authorized representative of the property to be served and request permission to construct the above facilities within the State Highway Rights -of -Way in accordance with the general provisions specified on page 2 of this form and any special provisions or plans made a part of this permit. I further certify that I have obtained and provided a copy to the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) of all other required governmental approval to perform the work authorized under this permit. I further understand that this permit shall be void if all work has not been completed within one year of permit issuance and a final inspection and approval from ITD has not been obtained. Owner's Name (Printed) Address City state Zip H.O.T. 1, LLC 3698 E. Lanark Meridian ID 183642 n,...,e Phillip E. Broadbent or or Joint User's 3698 E. Lanark Phone Number 208-855-0617 Phone Number 208-855-0617 208-888-4306 City StateZip Meridian 11D 183642 Fax Number 208-888-4306 Subject to all terms, conditions, and provisions shown on this form or attachments, permission is hereby granted to the above- named annlicant to narfnrm thin uy^rtl d --a, Local Government A royal When Re uired Signature Department Approval Title Date Sign Tbl� ue Date iil-IL- Ix Q,,,,,wasly ulim midi inspection ana approval by a department representative. &K;VrF fob June 3, 2008 • IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT • P.O. Box 7129 208) &U-8000 Boise ID 83707-1129 � t dah itd.idaho.gov Mr. Fredric V. Shoemaker 950 W. Bannock, Suite 900 Boise, ID 83702 Re: Encroachment Permit 03-08-319 — State Highway 55 Dear Mr. Shoemaker: You were informed by letter that our department was proceeding with your request for a variance to allow the upgrade of an existing access on SH -55. This letter serves to memorialize the details and to bring this matter to closure. Your request for a variance to allow an upgrade in size and use of your existing deeded approach Is approved with the following conditions: 1) Deeded Access: The approach which is currently shown in the Corporation Warranty Deed, Instrument No. 0107000563. recorded September 1, 1988, will be allowed to be upgraded to a RT-IN/RT-OUT Commercial approach. The conditions of approval and use of this approach will become an integral part of the approved Encroachment Permit 03-08- 319 and a new recorded Warranty Deed. The new deed will be prepared for your signature by the Idaho Transportation Department and will be recorded once you have reviewed and signed the document. 2) Approach Location Eagle Road — Locations as shown on Highway Plans for project F- 3271(44), Sheets 17 and 19 of 30 are as follows: Pine St. Highway Sta. 89+18.38, the requested approach Highway Sta. 85+18.4 Left and Commercial Street, Highway Sta. 80+80.4. The approach as addressed on Permit 03-08-319 will be required to be centered between Pine Street and Commercial Street at highway sta. 84+99.39. 3) Eagle Road Impact Mitigation - Due to the high volumes of traffic that are shown at build out in the Traffic Impact Study, it will be required to build right tum deceleration lanes southbound on Eagle Road (SH -55) at Pine Street, the proposed approach at highway station 84+99.39, and at Commercial Street. a. Approach Design — The approach with pork chop median must be a painted island only and retain the alignment of the edge line of Eagle Road as much as possible. The current design as shown would have the tendency to let the southbound Eagle Road traffic drift to the right into the deceleration area because the edge line alignment is not retained. Continued ................ Mr. Frederic V. Shoemaker June 3, 2009 Page 2 b. Pavement Markings — It will be required that all three deceleration lanes be marked per ITD standard drawings. c. A raised median will be required to address safety and operational issues related to your approach and to restrict the approach to RT-INRT•Dut with the construction and design matching that of the raised median which was installed on Eagle Road south of Franklin Road. The installation will start from the stop bar of the south leg of the Pine and Eagle Road intersection and continue to Commercial Street. The median will be required to be configured for the allowance of a left tum lane at Commercial Street for southbound vehicles. 4) Signalization and Pavement Markings — The developer will be required to coordinate any signal and pavement marking changes with ITD and ACHD to make sure there are no adverse effects to the existing operation and safety of the affected streets and roadways. 5) All off system roadway improvements and development entry points on Commercial Street and Pine Street will need to be built to alleviate a percentage of the trip generation from using the Eagle Road approach and must be built in conjunction with or in advance of the Eagle Road approach. These improvements must be approved and coordinated through ACRD. 6) A copy of this letter stating the conditions of approval will be provided to the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) for their future reference. Upon receipt of this letter, please formalize your acceptance of the conditions of approval to me in writing. I will then immediately provide you with the approved permit and a copy of ITD construction requirements. If you have any questions In regard to the conditions of approval please feel free to contact me by phone or e-mail. Sincerely, BR JENNINGS, P.E. State Highway Operations and Safety Engineer (208) 334-8557 Brent.JennInas@ftd.Idaho.no Cc: Ada County Highway District 3775 Adams St. Garden City, Idaho 83714 Attn: Terry Little, Manager -Traffic Services mom SAIrc.1 �C_�cs5 F'GOGIalF(sl J5t TOS- POOR TO. CORPORATION WARRANTY DEED 8843lo9 Project No. F -.FR -3211(44 ) G1070--')05(;0 Parcel No. 21 I.D_ 31697, Key No. 3230 THIS INDENTURE, :fade this 1st day of Jule -, in tae year of I9 33, between ZLIXIjR INDUSTRIES, a California Corporation, successor to and w.o ac: uire:i title as ALU11-t-FJRm OF IDAHO, a corporation duly organized any existing under the lavas of the Stare of Idaho , and naviag acs princ_—Pal office in Idano at 535 N. Eagle Road , in me County or Ada Grantor, and the STATE OF IDAHO, by and t.^.rouga ^n-- IDAHO-TiLy:2S?03,AT_1OJ BOARD for ChO D.IVI3ION CSE a13HWAYB, 33?= Wiest mace 9tr•e2r; 30iae, I.'a:7n 83703, Grantee. 41'.-L.l EJ.;L'lgs T au Grancor, naving aut,loriZed CnO undarsignsd afr_�_rs b =so3u�aen aa� r passi b, its i ec Xe ace -} Sour.: of D r cors to c a ._JUJeVz4ncd CZ) C. -Bid iescr ;bee 13ilUS, for !nd In ^.or133G_ra- .._J. at .::]: 4n.l No One Hundredtns (1.00) Dollars, -al.d to it, rea.C•'.ip -azraoz is nes granted, oar33ined, sold and ctmveyei, and ry r.esa zresents does grant, oargain, sell and convey unto the Gran- it3 3L8Ccassur$ a3:d .assigns forever, is fee simple, tae Following :;ascr*oea real estats to ar.her ;rlitn all rights of access between the rig:m of gay of cne said project and the remaining conriguous real property belonging to the Grantor except For one point of access to Sagle Road to be located on atne Left (westerly) side between SCations 901T96.40 area S9+53.27 of Eagle Road, Project No. . -FR-3271(44) Hignway Survey situated in tree County of Ada, State of Idano, described as 101lows, to -wit: 3 parcel of land being an the Westerly side of the centerline of Eagle load Project '.Jo. F -r R-32 71(44) iiignway survey as snown on tae plans thereof now on rile in the Office or cne Idano {rrnsoortacion Depart.-aent, Division of highways, and Pace 1 of 4 C-ORPJ0..0.i T^N WARR.3NTY DEED Pro-lect No. F-eR-32 71(44 ) Parcel No. 21 Z -D. 31397 Key No. 3250 41070^0561 3_in3 a porting of the Ne34564 of Section d, Townsnip 3 North, Range 1 zasL, Boise Meridian, described as follows, -to -wit: seginaing ar: cne Nottaeast corner of the NE4SE.x of Section 8, Townsnip 3 Narzil, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian thence West- erly along che North lige of said NE sz:4 a distance of 70.0 feet, more Or- less, to a point in a line parallel with and 70.0 =Lee Westerly from ::he centerline and bears .4orth Ss'31' 433' west from Station dg+58.17 of said Eagle Road Project No_ F -,F 7? (��) iiiyn:�ajr Survey; thence Sout;-t 102ts' 17" West along said parallel line 822.:: . eet, mores o~., -less, to a Point t:lat bears aortil 43'31' 3" yesr ;L.% real frca Station 31+35.71 of said Hignway Survey; znence joi2:_:l ti,2J'i5" West - 714.78 A' --- nt to -a pont in c.qe Aorta line of %Jiilmerciat Streec tia,t begs North do*31142" cst:eet fGo;l .5t3tlon d1*ld. J4 of sa-&d Highway sur'oey; _ -- La_I?: .3oa2t:l l�-o' l �" ties` ai..i reset to a in to point a a--n- terline if Commercial street and opposite Station 20++6.40 or said zUgnway Survey; taenca Easterly along the cenrerline of said Connerc.ial 3Cra_t- 140.4 iz-2t, acre or less, :o a Point in the caac line of said tnence Norzherly along said Gast zine 472.0 feet, ,more or less, to the PLAC2. OF 32G.111AINv. Ewgru+ay 3zation ?eFa:_nce: 80+66.40 to 59+53.17 T.qe area above 3escr zned contains appraximacel 135. 3 acr e y . s, 0. '2341 acres of whlcn is acknowledged to be a portion of a puolic road. Any right of way fencing to be constructed is not necessarily intended to designate the P--onerzy line and any variance berween t:•le location of r i gilt of way fencing and the actual property line as herein described $!tall not be construed as a nodi=icacmon or alteration of tris description. Gr_--ntor Conveys unto me tira_nree the rignt to prohibit the erec- tion or coastructi.on of any buildings or structures Except irr:gacion Page 2 of 4 - - . - • _ " - aso�o`:a X62 CORPORATION 14-ARP-ANTY DEZED i Project No. r:2-3271(44 ) Parcel No. 21 I.D. 31897 Key oto. 3250 or .drainage structures witnin twenty feet (201) of the real pcoperry aoov,e described. _Tt is SX�;ressly incended what Lnese covenants, burdens and Lestrictiors snail rua Nita rae land and s.ail forever bind the Grantor it; successors and assigns. TO HAVE A.ii) TO HOLD t:le said premises, with tneit appurtenances, unta the said Gcaatee and i;%' --s successors and assigns forever. And the s-ranr-a7c does nereoy toss-ananL to ane 7iit.^. the Grantee, t:].iL iz I -a z. -le owner 'a ` c- 51�:1e o: said pr'3;ii2es', that tnev- ar3 :ren °rom a! anj =nazw 1L 4111 war arm anti de -Ana same ita ra all lawful cxa; us a�:ataoe�•er . I?: -iI _.:;5S .:II RE;4;r, 'I.na :ir1:iLJL in a:s causeii it corporat'a axme tJ sw,,e er,unto subscribed by its seal to be 3ztixed ay Its Presijeat and its corporate 3ecratary, in pursuance zo said resolution, tile? day .n3 year first aoove 8f.Ix-LR in 'rage of 4 I'.tten. R -Pfe& (-=.i cie 1 CORPGRA ION WARRANTY JE3D ©1.07000-563 ?ro3ecc No. F -FR -3271(44 ) ?4r cel No- 21 I . D _ 31 33 7 zey Vo. 3253 STATE OF i 'I -y c �Q Cz)unty of .^.a :.:zis Jy o; . 1319 P , be -fore me the undersiGnec, a 'riot ark _u6licUin a.1d for sai•1 3ttxte, personally a�,asrad� and kno;;n --a �tt to be tna -i `V 4"c.tt�- and of tna carzarac,on 4n : n e ecutsd t-qa torsgoi rig, L1stru-- zant, and icknowled-ed to me twat saio corporation exeCuted Z.he Same. :lava nere'u"zu s=C rty rind and Stt'-Xed my oizicial acal the jav and _v -4r -;a this =8rtiiicate 4 st oove wrizzen. cl tT Psolic -or at MY corhnisaion expires OFFJOAL SEAL JEAN C. PURCELL "OT4Rr PuLUC. cu."'M'M PARI MICE IH LOS AYCFLa COUVTV Ml fammiXim Ev. Feh <.1991 nL7 Giim' y. i-N'1;a !gyp iiC:,.:A -t 6i* cr .R P tall Page 4 or 4 PINE_BRIDGE Traffic Impact Study Item #1: Safety 1. The proposed approach will improve traffic safety. a. The proposed SLIP lane conforms to ITD and AASHTO design criteria. b. The continuous right -turn lane across the entire site frontage (Pine Street to Commercial Court) will increase intersection capacity and eliminate speed differential conflicts. c. The proposed approach will reduce the traffic volume and overall number of conflict points at the site entrance from Pine Street. d. The crash rate on SH 55 adjacent to the site is higher than the state average for this type of highway. Adding lane capacity will improve overall performance. Item #2: System Operation 1. The proposed approach improves the operation of the highway system. a. The total approach delay at the Pine/Eagle intersection will improve with the addition of this approach. Right -turn movements are reduced on the critical approach. b. Without the proposed highway approaches, the level of service on the eastbound leg of Pine Street will decrease, and the vehicle queue extending from the signal will block the main site access. c. The SB -LT queue length on the Chinden approach will be 125 feet. This queue can be safely accommodated with on-site roadway design. d. The proposed driveway will replace 2 existing permitted approaches. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. Page 1 Analysis of Alternatives Pinebridge With Right-In/Right-Out Approach to Eagle Road Intersection Approach LOS Delay (sec_j Queue Eagle/Pine Intersection E 56.4 ... Eagle/Pine EB - Right Turn D 37.5 475' Without an Approach to Chinden Intersection Approach LOS Delay (sec.) Queue Eagle/Pine Intersection E 57.2 ... Eagle/Pine EB - Right Turn D 39.7 800'0) Notes: (1) Blocks access to Pine Street from the main site driveway • RADIUS NOTICE REPORT 23 -Nov -2010 • FILE NAME: Scentsy Owners Owner Address BLUE'CROSS OF ID HEALTH SERVICES INC 3000 E PME AVE MERIDIAN_ ID 83642-5995 Property Address: Scentsy BLUE CROSS OF ID HEALTH SERVICES INC 3000 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN_ ID 83642-5995 Property Address: Scents) - BLUE CROSS OF ID HEALTH SERVICES INC 3000 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-5995 Property Address: Scentsy BLUE CROSS OF ID HEALTH SERVICES INC 3000 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN_ ID 83642-5995 Property Address: Scentsy BLUE CROSS OF ID HEALTH SERVICES INC 3000 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-5995 Property Address: Scentsy BLUE CROSS OF ID HEALTH SERVICES INC 3000 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-5995 Property Address: Scentsy CROSSROADS PROFESSIONAL CENTER BUSI 4414 S GEKELER LN BOISE, ID 83716-0000 Property Address: Scentsy DMB INVESTMENTS LLC 250 S BEECHWOOD # 120 BOISE, ID 83709-0000 Property Address: Scentsy DMB INVESTMENTS LLC 250 S BEEC14WOOD # 120 BOISE_ ID 83709-0000 Property Address: Scentsy 1 Owners Owner Address DMB INVESTMENTS LLC 250 S BEECHWOOD # 120 BOISE. ID 83709-0000 Property Address: ELIXIR INDUSTRIES r Property Address: HALKER VENTURES LLC JAMES A KISSLER LLC Property Address: JACKSONS FOOD STORES INC Property Address: MCCALL PROPERTIES INC Property Address: MCCALL PROPERTIES INC Property Address: MERIDIAN METRO EXPRESS LLC Property Address: STEIN HOLDINGS LLC Property Address: Scents} 24800 CHRISANTA DR # 100 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691-0000 Scents} 855 BROAD ST # 300 BOISE; ID 83702-0000 Scentsy 3450 E COMMERCIAL CT MERIDIAN_ ID 83642-0000 Scents} 5480 NW FRONT AVE PORTLAND, OR 97210-0000 Scentsy 5480 NW FRONT AVE PORTLAND, OR 97210-0000 Scentsy 2700 AIRPORT WAY BOISE. ID 83705-0000 Scents} - X408 NE 88TH ST STE 13101 VANCOUVER_ WA 98665-0000 Scentsy 2 Hearing -Date: December 21; 2010 File No.: MDA -10-010 Project Name: Scentsy Campus Request: Request to modify the existing development agreement to update the owner information and development plan for the Scentsy Campus, by Sam Johnson, H.O.T. 1, LLC. Location: The site is located on the southwest corner of E. Pine Avenue and N. Eagle Road (SH 55), in the SE % of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East. File No.: VAR -002 Request: Request for a variance to UDC 11 -3H -4B to allow a right-in/right out access point to/from the site via Eagle Road between Pine Avenue and Commercial Street, by Sam Johnson, H.O.T. 1, LLC.