HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Response to Applicant ResponsePage 1 of 2
Machelle Hill
From: Sonya Waters
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:08 AM
To: Dugie, Richard
Cc: Barbara Shiffer; Jacy Jones; Jaycee Holman; Machelle Hill
Subject: RE: Jack in the Box CUP Staff Report for 11/18 P&Z Mtg
Richard,
In follow-up to our phone conversation, I wanted to also respond to your response to the staff report in writing for
the record...
In regard to the conditions in Exhibit B of the staff report mentioned below, please note the following:
Condition 1.6 - If a property boundary adjustment isn't approved prior to CZC then asite/landscape plan that
shows the entire property in its current configuration needs to be submitted for CZC approval. A 25-foot wide
landscape buffer would also be required to be shown on the site/landscape plan along the south boundary of the
property adjacent to the existing residential uses, as required by UDC Table 11-2B-3 in accord with the standards
in UDC 11-3B-9C. An alternative would be to submit for CZC as stated w/plans showing the whole property &
then come back with revised plans (CZC application "with prior approval" - $173) showing the new configuration
of the property after the PBA is approved, prior to occupancy.
Condition 1.4 -Hours of Operation: Staff recommends the hours of operation of the drive-thru be limited because
staff is of the opinion the residences that border the south boundary of this site would likely be adversely affected
by noise from the drive thru speaker as well as noise from cars (stereos/music) (the nearest residential properties
are approximately 150' from the site). Typically there is a transition in zoning and/or uses between higher intense
commercial uses & residential uses that lessen the adverse impacts of uses such as this on residential uses;
however, there is none in this case. You may present your request fora 24 hour drive-thru at the Commission
during the public hearing.
ITD received a transmittal of the application from the City Clerk. However, you should contact them for a letter
indicating the site plan is in compliance with ITD's standards and policies for submittal with the CZC application.
Thanks,
Sonya
From: Dugie, Richard [mailto:Richard.Dugie@stantec.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:35 AM
To: Sonya Wafters; ]acy Jones; Jaycee Holman; Machelle Hill
Subject: RE: Jack in the Box CUP Staff Report for 11/18 P&Z Mtg
Hi Sonya
There are three items that I would like to discuss. Two of these items we feel would greatly hinder the
development.
IX Analysis
Item A. 1. Site Plan: the Property Boundary Adjustment being approved and finalized prior to issuance of the
CZC. This is an item that is by the owner and not Jack in the Box. While we understand that this does need to be
done we do not see why it is required prior to approval of the CZC. As without the CZC approval it is my
understanding that we cannot submit for our building permits. On many of the other projects that we have done in
the area some of those required a PBA process and the jurisdiction allowed the project to flow forward with the
understanding of all parties that the PBA is conditioned to receiving final occupancy. We ask that you reconsider
this condition.
11/18/2010
Page 2 of 2
Item A. 1. Hours of Operation: The hours of operation at this site is vital to its existence at this location. The 24
hour drive-thru is a function that drives most of the business for a JIB location as 60% of the sales made are
through the drive-thru. There is only one speaker in the drive-thru and after 10 pm it automatically reduces the
decibels levels from the daytime operation. Additionally the menu board faces west not south towards the
residential. We request that this item be reconsidered as it is a driving point for the success if this location.
The last item is A. 1. F. Did the city notify ITD or was that something we were required to do?
Richard Dugie
Associate
Stantec
12034 - 1 34th Court Northeast Suite 102
Redmond WA 98052
Ph: (425) 298-1068
Fx: (425) 298-1020
rduaie@stantec_com
stantec.com
The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for
any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and
notify us immediately.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
11/18/2010