HomeMy WebLinkAboutParkway Subdivision AZRECEIVED
OCT 0 3 2003
r,-„~•
~ridian
11 ioneo
STAFF SUMMARY
OF
City Of Meridian.
City Clerk Office
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Project Name:
Case No(s).:
Applicant:
Parkway Subdivision
PP-03-022/ AZ-03-017
Six Point Development
P&Z Commission Hearing Date: September 4, 2003
Recommendation: Approve with conditions
Summary of Public Hearing:
• 1 member of the public either testified in opposition or expressed concerns about the
project
• 0 members of the public testified in support of project
Key Commission Changes to Staff Recommendation:
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the applicant realign the entrance to
the subdivision. The applicant has submitted plans depicting this change.
Outstanding Issues for City Coancd:
• None.
BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE ) Case No. AZ-03-017
REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION & )
ZONING OF 6.0 ACRES TO R-4 ) RECOMMENDATION TO CITY
ZONE FOR Parkway Subdivision ) COUNCIL
'Six Point Development, )
Applicant )
The property is approximately 6.0 acres in size and is generally located at the
southwest intersection of Ustick Road and Meridian Road, Meridian. The
property is designated as RUT.
2. The owner of record of the subject property are John K. Barton and Leta Barton.
Applicant is Six Point Development.
4. The subject property is currently zoned RUT and has one existing dwelling.
5. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as R-4 .
6. The subject property is bordered to the north by L-O to the south by R-4, to the
east by RUT, and to the west by RUT.
The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact
of the City of Meridian.
8. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service
Planning Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
9. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner:
Fourteen building lot residential subdivision.
10. The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as R-4 which is
consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map
which designates the subject property as Low Density Residential.
11. There aze no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the
consideration of this application.
11. 12. The Planning and Zoning Commission recognized the concerns of of
Wendel Bigham from Joint School District No. 2 in a letter dated July 9, 2003.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCII, FOR APPROVAL OF REZONE FOR * BY * - * -Page 1
RECOMMENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City
Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the requested Annexation And Zoning
as requested by the applicant for the property described in the application, subject to the
following:
A. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Department as
follows:
1. The legal description submitted with the application appears to meet the requirements
of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and places the parcel contiguous
to existing city limits
2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when
services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-
domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. Applicant shall be responsible for the
physical abandonment of existing wells and septic systems, as well as the connection
of the existing home to city services.
B. Adopt the Rewmmendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows:
1. That afire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute be available to service the entire project.
Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 500' apart. 1997 UFC Appendix III-A
2. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required
before combustible construction begins. UFC 901.4.2 & 901.3
3. Acceptance of water supply for fire protection is contingent upon acceptance of the
water system by the City of Meridian for water quality.
4. All radii shall be 28' inside and 48' outside radius.
RECOIvIMENDATION TO CITY COUNCII- FOR APPROVAL OF REZONE FOR * BY * - * -Page 2
5. The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response wne goal. Achievement
of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is intended to enhance the
probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic Life Support. The budget
constrains are typically defined as capital outlay for facilities that are located within
1.5 miles from a given location and sufficiern operational funds to staffthe facilities.
6. According to a report completed by Fire & Emergency Services Consulting Group in
February of 2000 our requests for service aze projected to reach 2800 in the yeaz 2005
and 3800 by the year 2010, this is up from 2069 responses in the yeaz 2000.
RECOMIvIENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF REZONE FOR * BY * - * -Page 3