Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeridian LDS Church VARWILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flre Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney ~ CO HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY UNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EE C L G ENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 KEITH BORUP Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Halt, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 11, 1997 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/26!97 HEARING DATE: 3/18/97 REQUEST: Variance request for reduction of set back BY: Meridian LDS Church LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 1560 N. Ten Mile (Ten Mile and Chem lane/ JIM JOHNSON, P2 MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z _GREG OSLUND, P/Z ~K4 BORUP, P/Z SEAT CORRIE, MAYOR _Pt+~ALD TOLSMA, C!C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: • CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, ID 83642 VARIANCE APPLICATION (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance) NAME: ~~ s ~ ~~Gr~{ - L,~~~ o~.ec~` Phone: 3 ¢2- 273- ~' _ ,.- (Owner or holder of valid option) ~~-~T~ ~"'~.-~ ser, ADDRESS: ~s~ b /~. ~~ ~ fZ'1 r ~l€. GENERAL LOCATION:- T'~•~ ~ r ~`e e C ~{-~.¢ ~f ~,,4,~ ~. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: S ~ ~ ~ S 3(' (- ~ - T~~ -- R~ ~ - SEC.( ~ -- O F OF OWNER V LID OP A co of our~ro e~" _ deed q' rY Y r ~ rtY ~r option agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION:_~ ~- VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map and/or site plan at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streets existing and proposed zoning and such other items as the City may require. SURRQUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A list of all property owners and addresses within, contiguous to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the pafcel(s) proposed for a variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor.) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE:__Qr n v ~Ti.~,:~ ~ rte 4, , ,, ~ s ~7- ~,4c. Ems- n .,t / ~ N ~ i , l 2 ~~ '{~ G, ~~ , -v SIGNATURE: ST~. S~ M M p^L S L-o.-, 3.s~o Ca,~Q-.¢.b 64~G~_ CITY COUNCIL RECORDS 3 4-S=~ X77 Date Received City Council Hearing Date Received by • February 11, 1997 Mr. Dean Ehlert Meridian Planning & Zoning 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: LDS -Ten Mile & Cherry Lane -Addition LCA N° 96045.01 4 d Dear Dean: Attached please find an application for a setback variance for an addition to an existing church located at 1560 N. Ten Mile which is currently zoned R-4.. This request is at the suggestion of the City Council during a previous hearing when we asked for direction on how to proceed on this project. The additional 1200 sq. ft. will be added on the west end of the building and will partially encroach approximately 5'-0" into the setback due to the additional right-of--way that ACHD obtained previously. I do not feel this addition will impact Ten Mile, and as discussed at our City Council Meeting, the Church would grant the remaining right-of--way to the south if required by the Highway District. I have included a list of addresses of all property owners located within 300'-0" of the referenced propert~as required. According to the Zoning Schedule, the front setback along Ten Mil is 30'-0" for arterial and collector streets, which we would like to have reduced to 25'-0" The original Church design was internally programmed for expansion for future Bishop's Office along the west end of the facility. With the addition of these offices and the expansion of the adjacent meeting rooms, overcrowding will be reduced at this and other facilities. The existing setback which partially jogs has not been used by A.C.H.D. to date for a taper, and therefore a 25'-0" setback should not compromise public safety now or at a later date. The 30'0" required setback is certainly proper for residential property by does adversely impact the Church due to its limited expansion capabilities in regards to internal operation efficiencies. I also feel that the commercial complex across Ten Mile would not be impacted by the reduction of the 30'-0" setback to 25'-0". LOMBARD-CONRAD, ARCHITECTS, P.A. • 1221 SHORELINE LANE, BOISE, IDAHO 83702-8880 • (208) 345-8877 • FAX (208) 344-9002 1119 IDAHO STREET, ELKO, NEVADA 89801 • (702) 778-9494 • FAX (702) 778-0495 19800 VILLAGE OFFICE COURT, #103, BEND, OREGON 97702 • (541) 382-9887 • FAX (541) 385-8818 Since 1972 LOMBARD-CONRAD ARCHITECTS ~ • Februa 11, 1997 Mr. Dean Ehlert City of Meridian Page 2 As you are aware, this Church and the proposed addition is in a unique zoning situation (R-4); however, should not affect Meridian's existing Comprehensive Plan. We do not plan to add any additional parking, but will re-landscape the site to add more variety and color to the neighborhood. I have also included an illustration for your use. This addition would certainly allow the existing Church facility to better serve its members both physically and spiritually. Sincerely, PA Steve M. Sim><rfons, AIA Associate Principal SMS/dt: 9645-O1.L04 LDS/CINDER, MERIDIAN 12 EXPANSION TEN MILE AND CHERRY LANE FILE ID: 9645-O1.LO4 LCA No. 96045.01 4d \_~I February 5, 1997 Ms. Shari Stiles Meridian Planning & Zoning 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: LDS -Ten Mile & Cherry Lane -Addition LCA N° 96045.01 4 d Dear Shari: • Attached please find an application for a setback variance for an addition to an existing church located at 1560 N. Ten Mile. This request is at the suggestion of the City Council during a previous hearing when we asked for direction on how to proceed on this project. The additional 1200 sq. ft. will be added on the west end of the building and will encroach approximately 5'-0" into the setback due to the additional right-of--way that ACHD obtained previously. I do not feel this addition will impact Ten Mile, and as discussed at our City Council Meeting, the Church would grant the remaining right-of--way to the south if required by the Highway District. As you are aware, the proposed addition faces the new Albertsons Store and therefore will not be further impacting any surrounding neighbors. We do not plan to add any additional parking, but will re-landscape the site to add more variety and color to the facility. Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, ARCHITECTS, PA Steve M. Simmons, AIA Associate Principal SMS/dt: 9645-O1.L04 LOMBARD-CONRAD, ARCHITECTS, P.A. • 1221 SHORELINE LANE, BOISE, IDAHO 83702-8880 • (208) 345-8877 • FAX (208) 344-9002 1119 IDAHO STREET, ELKO, NEVADA 89801 • (702) 778-9494 • FAX (702) 778-0495 19800 VILLAGE OFFICE COURT, #103, BEND, OREGON 97702 • (541) 382-9887 • FAX (541) 385-8818 Since 1972 '. • • Fc,r Value Received i Clarence W, Clauson AKA Clarence Clauson and 7_ola Clauson, Hushand and 1.Jife the grantor s, do hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto THF. CORPORATIGN OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THF. CHURCH OF .JESUfi CHRIST OF LATTER UAY SAINTS the grantee ,whose current address is 336 South Third St. East Salt Lake C:lty, Utah 84111 the following described premises, in ADA County Idaho, to-wit: That portion of Northtaest Z Section 11, T. 3N, R.1!J. , 13oise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Section, line wf;ich hears South 300.00 feet from the Section corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10, and 11, T3N, R1W., Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. Thence South along said Section line 300.00 feet to a point 'thence South 89°03'40" East 726.].5 feet to a ste 1 pin. thence North 300.00 feet to a steel pin. Thence North 89°03'40" West 726.1` feet to the place of beginning. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, 4vith t.hcir ~chpurtenances unto the said Grantee its heirs and assigns forever. And the paid Grantors do hereby covenant to and with the srcid Gr~cntce ,that the) are the owners in fcc simple of said premises; that they are free from all incumbranees Except: 1978 taxes, current nears irrigation, and easements. and that t}tey will war-•ant and defend the same froth ~~II lawful claims whatsoever. Dated : Ap ri 1 ~ _'~ ~ 19 ~ o STATE OF IDAFIO, COUNTI OF Canyon On this '_' U{ ~ day of APFil , I~ 78, before me, n notary public in and for the said State, per- sonally appeared..,,. ~ Clarence W. Clauson and ., •' ~. .,- '' ~ii~.ti , , know~rt to .me ~to T>e the person S whose Homo s are subijcJived`~fa~Slie ~~=thin ink rumeat, and ncknowledsed to i r~ ii l ~ ;, , ~~ Clarence ~:. Clauson %oia Clauson S'1'AT1~; OF' ID 1110, COU::T1 OF : ' _~.c~- Ihereby certify thnt this instrument yeas filed for record at tha request of ~,~FC{~Q T~{L't 'l at ~~ minLtes past ~f ,o'clock ~ Itt., ~: 19,E .~ , in my vl;. c, ar.d uu!y mc.rded in L'oek of I)ccds nt Pu;;c C/: '-7 r iT I ~ ~ I G /O I // ~ I ~ ~ .• . t:.._ ~''RI _ I II . i i~ 'I: .II 'll ~I ~~ li Z :I. i~ .~ ~I~ • SEC. I I - T. 3 N.-R. I W. ADA COUNTY ZONING COMMISSION ~....~ ,, 1 ~; R, R•4 ,: • »i.. /.~.~ L..r./.../ 5..... M•/i *COUNTY ZONES Updated 1-10-89' ~, b~ Q e ., -~ ~I ,_ ii SEC. 11 - T SN.-R ~w. 10 J ~ FILE COPY • February 5, 1997 i 1 Ms. Shari Stiles Meridian Planning & Zoning 33 E. Idaho ' Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: LDS -Ten Mile & Cherry Lane -Addition LCA N~ 96045.01 4 d Dear Shari: Attached please find an application for a setback variance for an addition to an existing church located at 1560 N. Ten Mile. This request is at the suggestion of the City Couacil during a previous hearing when we asked for direction on how to proceed on this project. The additional 1200 sq. ft. will be added on the west end of the building and will encroach approximately 5'-0" into the setback due to the additional right-of--way that ACRD obtained previously. I do not feel this addition will impact Ten Mile, and as discussed at our City Council Meeting, the Church would grant the remaining right-of way to the south if required by the Highway District. As you are aware, the proposed. addition faces the new Albertsons. Store and therefore will not be further impacting any surrounding neighbors. We do not plan to add any additional parking, but will re-landscape the site to add more variety and color to the facility. Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, LOMBAIjd~-CON1jA~ARCHITECTS, PA Steve M. Simmons, AIA Associate Principal SMS/dt: 9645-01.LlM LOMBARD-CONRAD, ARCHITECTS, P.A. • 1221 SHORELINE LANE, BOISE, IDAHO 83702-8880 • (208) 345-6677 • FAX (208) 344-9002 1119 IDAHO STREET, ELKO, NEVADA 89801 •(702) 778-9494 • FAX (702) 778-0495 Since 1972 GU -a.e~`l•~o..w~•, ~ ln.e,. 2F~o ~ c.e,~~,u • (~l~ d . p ~,,,, „ ~ 5 and 1M ar r t o~.~n ne. ~1'. ~ avt se,~. l 35 2 r'ec.~ ~ . a~-c~ ~ o .ion L • ~..5 ~' ~ 3 3 0 •~~s~~d 837z~ N . t~ ~ ~~'~ C,,r~ef~. ~' ~ . YY`pr- loan 83Co~Z- 2q-11 W• Gt.~-^ S~- VV~e~'~~ia.~. , 1~ d31Q~-2 • ~~f30 vin. ~~n.a.e~,1 a~ o ~.~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~•e.w.~ ~lS (~S , (l.,v- n S}. W~'~ ~~a~. ~ 3 C~ 4Z ' 112 O I~o~S ~d S~ a~e~ (~ eta , ~p3a 1;c) • Ole ~ S~. iN~, ~ t dta,v~- 8 3~ ~ 2 ~ I lBb r l~.o ~o po~~~ t~„ e~ ~I`111 ~a.t r u t e.~ (~,,.e,. '~tS.Q. ~ 1 ~ g3~°~ ' ~ ~ IS c vin y~ ~r, , G - P• ~ • ~-.. I(V1, ~, ~~l De ~ vs W~~ r, . _ ~o v..a. l~ ow~-a ~'~.~,1- n,e, '(mil }' ~ owe... 3 Ca~Z " ~~,5 3 P ~ 4(v W • S1n•e.,r~l S+ vY~er•, eltav~- 2 ~ `' g3co ~Z- • X355 ~l ~~-\`' ~ ay~ c~ Cj~O c. t~1~ ~. ~~q,r-o~ QV~• ~2rtc~.taM- ~j3(Q~2. L~~j`jrJ ~'~` ~ ~ ~-~-~- (~~e ~(Y~er~~cw Z _ ~ ASS ~j3~ `~~a ~• ~,ava 1(~,, ~a~ aid J~~1 l~r~nn.5ev~• s ~ 3\ V~ . C,~ ~~•~ Ql,~. INS ~ ~~~-~ is ot~.~. l,t .~ as G ~ t~s _ ~a ~~ •w • SwW~~ 5k. vv~~~a,~... 2 • ~ 3 55 83~~ ,~ o ~~ aN..d (, esa 1`J „~ o ~ ~,~„ ~_ t~~,~~ • ~a V'eo~orv~ o~M-~ ~o~~barA L~lro~ Csor- 2 ~~ 2 3 (,v . S~~l 5~ . ~ e~r~ d ~ ~,• 83 Co ~ 2 ~ ~ 3S 3 `~ob~r ~- ~ ~ b o t n ~ Iz ~o Ids ~3Cp 13e1 a,r'.~ 5.4-. ~3oise, td f;3~p~ -Z~e( Cam. u~. ~"~ rw..d ~In ~. ~"h' ~ ~ ~}31~ ~=-~~'~~s~ ate.. ~~~dW~ P~~, ~~ . ~-{u.tT ~q~2 'Re~ocr~lo~- T~~s-~ 917 UCH -285 °v 3Ce~-2 -~~p~- ~2 Pay ca~.~J ~ 3 C~ Z - S ~-o~- ~ ~ NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on March 18, 1997, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Meridian LDS Church, for a Variance application for land located in the NW '/4, Section 11, T.3N, R.1 W, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located at 1560 Ten Mile. The Application requests a variance for a reduction of the required set back on Ten Mile. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 28th day of February, 1997. ~~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CLERK PUBLISH February 28 and March 7, 1997. i i i i i i i i i r1~' -W " i ~~ -, i ~ ~ .._ _ i ~ ~ ~ ~_~ ~ } ~~ ~ . _J ~3 ~ _. ~ ~~ ~ ,~~ ~ ~x•~~ ~ ARE~4 OF _1_ INFRINGEMENT i i i f I ..J 1 ExISTING suILDING '~' -m" l II IJ 2~' --m ti~ ~~ ~~ i~ ~~ ~~ i I.. _.... ~ n l _/h 1i ~ -4DDITION 1 3Q~' --~" I' ~- ad !J 1' F' pp~ ~ Q a ~ ~ n. ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ w v ac c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ o ~ U 1 `~ 0 m J !m N i ~ N O J L U ,y Q N .-~ 4ND 0 -Y ASSESSOR lyds Division *** rmation Systems iri Street 83702 s4-23~s NORTH rade from data copyrighted by Ada County. hall not be Gable for inaccuracies or misuse 'Naps bearing ffiis disclaimer maybe freely. Howevler, use in any digital form written permission of Ada County. 3 2 lQ ~~'II {}}~~ Nesasaaw 72s.Js ti 1 ~tt•'~ 51211223092 t~ ~ 7C 5004q-40E 1~ EXISTING SITE !,~ {I 51211223105 }' i ~1 _ SCALE: 1" = 200 FT This is a compilation of records as the appear in Ada County. This drawing is to be used ONLY for reference purposE and Ada County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. 3 .I N0040L!!W 1J0.p !_...__.~...~~SQ„~7 589"~_. _.._i I 83508270330 ~°~ ~° ,, I 7q°~ry 0ry~°~ i HA N P p,5° , , ~ 83508270340 -- ~~'~ 9 ~ _ / Wl~_6_Y_ _CT ---~ ' 83508270350 ~~~. 7,70 ~0'~ `. I 51211223022 ' 0ry~0 y00ry _ g7 8350827036 P5~70 Q,S .~ . - $ y 83508270400 0'~9 1 O 8 ~ ~5°~~~ ( 0ti°oy I ti 8350827041 ~~-~ (P'y0 g 18350827042 ~~~~ ~- - 9 - ~ 0440 I 604 C ~ ry I ( ,y06`L I . y00 I R350827D43 Q- ~ p"~ ~~ ~~ 4 1 O 7 P ~0h ^°~i ^p ^O 1B ^°0. 460 ^O O° yobry ~~obry ~y°ery y°bry bry~° y°ory I ., 6°4 P~ Q' ~ Q- P1 ,~° P~ I 00ry ~ ~~ P70 ti: P' r~ - .,,. - _ 0 0 f a 6 ~ .0 60 ho .0 4^0--------~o y°m y~o0 06ry Obry 00ry 00ry I y06ry 06ry ~ ry^0 ry^° ^0 ^O ^O ^O I 60 X04 .. i ?~ 1 ?~ I ~" Jy P'hh why Phy I ?~ ~'Sy I a I :.' O I 0ry~ I 0ryry 1 7 ry,SO ,70.44 19 0 0 Ory~ 7 O,y,P 622 - °ry ry~ ry1 .70 bry' ,7'7 ry~ ,4'1 ~i. bye ~0g '000 606'4 'yp X000 6 06 00. ~~° P' P' N .3 P P P R- ~ I ~~. NssoSasw 72s.Js ~ ~ 51211223205 I .,~ 835082 2~ N00.054pW 7xfe RJ5082 I~_ L," 51211223210 ~ 1835082 ~ ~ ~I j S 0945.40 E I ail, .\ \'.~ X \~,d~ 51211223300 ~ \ 30920-00! SS0.e0 55205 8 51211233802 Seuo-v! ~o roo 0 00 ~0 6 60 - o. -- -o. y00 ~ yob q°6 q00 °W y 00^' 6~ O bry 0 ? ?~ Q'J Q~ Qh P^i P~y ^0 0hy ~ ~ 10 1-r O ry0 15 70 1 fi ~ 40 ~ ~0 7 g ~ o I ~6~ ~ 21- 00ry, ' 0 ry 0 ry Ory 40° `40 ryy 00 ryb Dry 00 J0 00 0'4 0 4 ~00 0 e~h 0 0 ~yO 000 .4 h00 ry ~ "j y00 6 ~h. 0ry ' ? P P 7 Q• Py 6 p 1 I ~00.y ._... _ __ __ _.....__ _-_.. I Rb500 __ -__ ._ __. .. 9 ~6 10 ~ ~0 4 12 Op 4ry 4 C 131 60.yc, 0ry00 rybph 0ry60 0ry00 00ry~ bry0 ryb0 ry60 y00~ j Q'Jy0 y00 'yh0 ^b0 P7h hy0 y00 yob P h ~h ,: _ 1 A~~ s0uo-ooE szz7o _ 5121'1233800 ai 51211223260 . ~ ~. \, ``x- ~` \•~ . \~ `\~ IR350827056. I a 18350827057 ' I ~9 ~ I X60'', I ; C 10.30°6 ~~ i 30 t p0 r • ~o ~~121ollpoolt~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q 1 1 ~~~ ~~Z.~3co'19d~1c~ Z ~ g 2-221 S bo2.~ a ~- ra ZZ't--1$ b~~ O a ~ g.,22~t~, ~o ~ g 222, l$ bo Sd o ~ $ Z.-zz t$ vU la:~ ,~ ~'Lo233t~$3~ ~1 ~~ Zi~V o21 o4°IO ~2. ?,5 d '~, 2~ CAS l o ~ 35n °0 2'ioS~ ,, Sao ~, ~ 4 O ~So ~. 35c~ V'i."~ a Z btu ~. 3 5 0$ 27 0 l °l b (~ 3~0 ~ 2'1 0 l ~,o ~ ~2112Z.~OgZ. 4 12th 22~oZZ ~ ~ 12.1 L '2,Z- 3 ZdS ~,- t 21 ~ Z Z- 3 'L- tee ~ ~Z~`ZZ3'ZCe~ Meridian .City Council April 1, 1997 Page 20 Lee: Yes, you are right, it may impact a few of those lots on the second phase of the project. I did walk that site before the last public hearing to take a look at those poles for myself. Part of them on the northerly portion I would say at least half are located about 30 off of the property, on Monty McClure's property. That won't affect phase 1, phase 2 there are some poles there that are situated near the. boundary, I think there was one that was on our property and the rest were on the. neighbors property. But, whatever easement that Idaho Power would require on the maintenance of those poles we will have to talk to them and decide what it should be and. identify it on our preliminary and final plats and shift everything over that amount. I don't think it will be much. Corrie: Any other questions of Mr. Lee? Anyone else from fhe public that would like to enter testimony at this time? Jim Witherell, 215 South Locust Grove, Meridian, was sworn by the City Attorney. Witherell: We would like this extended too, we don't have any idea of what these conditions are that are being imposed, we are being held in suspense. So before I go shooting my mouth off on what we think we should have which we may have already got we would like this extended. Thank you Corrie: Anyone else from the public that would like to enter testimony at this time? Council, questions of staff? Do you wish to continue the public hearing? Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I would make a motion that we continue the public hearing to the April 15. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley, second by Mr. Rountree, any further discussion? Question Gary would that give you enough time? Lee: (Inaudible) Corrie: All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST TO REDUCE THE SETBACK BY MERIDIAN LDS CHURCH: Morrow: Mr. Mayor on that set of findings of fact and conclusions of law I have a question with respect to on page 6, item 7, I for the life of me can't figure out this is supposed to be part of these findings of fact and conclusions. Item 7 says that there does not appear, there does appear to be a specific benefit or profit, economic gain or convenience to the applicant. If the variance is not granted the house would be required Meridian City Council April 1, 1997 Page 21 to be moved which would require it be demolished and construction started over. But it is not the applicant that created the ordinance violation. That the ordinance has been changed since the subdivision plat was approved and the house setback now meets the current setback requirements. It would be in the best interest of the City to grant a variance. It can't be applied to the LDS church can it. Crookston: Well all I need to do is (inaudible) Morrow: So the issue here is that (inaudible) is there something of substance that we are missing in these findings of fact and conclusions? Crookston: This paragraph does not apply whatsoever to this application. Corrie: I think you pulled this out of a different program. It would be apropos if it were a neighborhood I think. If you want to delete it would be proper to delete it. Crookston: You could delete it. Morrow: What should the paragraph say? Crookston: The only thing that would apply to this would be the last sentence or last clause. Morrow: So you mean the last clause that says the City's current set back requirements that it would be in the best interest of the City to grant the variance? Crookston: I would just leave the paragraph to say that it would be in the best interest of the City to grant the variance. Corrie: So item #7 would read, take out everything except it would be in the best interest of the City to grant the variance, is that correct? Crookston: That is correct Morrow. And then items A through D stay the same and item 9 (inaudible) Crookston: That is correct. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I move that the city Council hereby approves these amended findings of fact and conclusions. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree, Second by Mr. Tolsma to approve of the findings of fact and conclusions of law as amended, any further discussion? Roll call vote Meridian City Council ~ • April 1, 1997 Page 22 ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Bentley -Yea, Rountree -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: Entertain a motion on the decision. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I move that it is decided that the application for the variance of a 30 foot setback on Ten Mile Road in effect is approved. The application should allow a 25 foot setback on Ten Mile Road and the front setback shall be at that distance. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree, second by Mr. Tolsma on the decision as read, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea FIVE MINUTE BREAK ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 5 ACRES TO T-E BY B.W. INC.: Corrie: At this time Morrow. Sorry to interrupt but I do own property within a 300 foot radius so if the Council sees a conflict I will stand down. Rountree: I don't see a conflict personally. Corrie: Any further comments, anyone see a conflict? Hearing none, the Council is agreed there is no conflict of interest. I will open the public hearing and invite the applicant to speak first. Dan Tortin, 250 South Beechwood, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Tortin: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council the request before you tonight is a request for annexation and zoning of a 5 acre parcel located on the north side of Layne Industrial on the east side of Locust .Grove Road. The request is submitted to you to facilitate the development of the Meridian School District Middle School Academy. With that presentation I will welcome any questions. Corrie: Any questions from the Council? Anyone else from the public that would like to issue testimony on this? Seeing, none Council I will close the public hearing. Council questions of staff? MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Aaril 1 1997 APPLICANT: MERIDIAN LDS CHURCH ITEM NUMBER; 5 REQUEST: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST TO REDUCE THE SETBACK AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS ~~~ ~ ~ j~ ~p ~,~J~ U'1 OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • • , BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APPLICATION OF LDS CHURCH - AREA OFFICE FOR A VARIANCE TO FRONT SET-BACK REQUIREMENT AT 1560 NORTH TEN MILE ROAD FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION8 The above entitled variance request having come on for hearing on March 18, 1997, at approximately 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, Steve Simmons appearing, and the City Council having heard and taken oral. testimony, the City Council of the City of Meridian makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the public hearing on the variance was published for two consecutive weeks prior to the scheduled hearing for March 18, 1997, the first publication of which was fifteen (15 ) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the March 18, 1997, hearing; that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That notice of public hearing is required to be sent to property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the land being considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E. , 11-2-419 D. , and 11- 9-612 B. l.b. of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that this requirement has been met. 3. That the property is zoned R-4 Residential, which at this time does not allow churches, but that is not the concern in the Application; the concern is that under 11-2-410 A, thirty ( 30 ) feet FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 1 • • is required for a front building set-back and twenty-five ( 25 ) feet for local streets; the property fronts on Ten Mile Road which is a collector street at this time, and the required front set-back for the church property is therefore thirty (30) feet. 4. That the Applicant has requested that it be granted a variance from the required front set-back requirement of thirty (30 ) feet and be allowed to only have a twenty-five ( 25 ) front set- back. 5. The entire property in question is described in the Application and is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 6. That the Applicant owns the property. 7. That the Applicant testified that they have submitted for the variance, a 5 foot infringement into the required 30 foot setback on the west side of the property fronting Albertson's directly to the west and Ten Mile. We haven't received any negative comments from staff or any of the other utilities in their review and basically are just waiting for. a decision. Our violation is only a small portion of the building because of the additional right of granted to ACRD back when the building was originally built. There was discussion between Mr. Simmons, the Mayor and Councilmen, City Engineer, Gary Smith, and Wayne Crookston, City Attorney, regarding the width of Ten Mile Road and if there would be sufficient set-back if the Road was widened; there was comment by Mr. Simmons, that the original width was requested or right of way was requested to allow for that flaring of that intersection. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 2 • We don't know when that is going to happen and our original letter to the Council we had also stated that the church would be willing to grant the additional five feet if required on the south side of the property. We haven't heard of a time frame as to when that is going to happen or even if it will happen. Mr. Morrow stated that that is a section line road, the right of way will be a 90 foot right of way. The cross section of asphalt ultimately could be the same as Cherry Lane. Mr. Crookston - stated that as he understood it they have a 30 foot required setback now and what they are asking for is a variance of 5 feet for this portion and they would then have a setback of 25 feet and Mr. Morrow stated the new setback would be 25 feet; that is correct. Mr. Morrow also stated that it was his presumption that ACHD had bought the right of way for a 90 foot right of way for the portion across the front of, not only the LDS church but the Reynolds property, and there is another little church to the south, Stonehouse. The question would be is, "Does the five foot right of way that ACRD acquired complete the 90 foot section, 45 feet on your side of center line which is the maximum right of way for that section line roads?" Mr. Simmons responded that that is the reason we are asking for the variance. We are five feet into the west setback on the top or I guess it would be the 3rd of the building to the north side which that illustration shows. So otherwise we wouldn't be asking for the variance. So you are correct Mr. Crookston that it would be a 25 foot setback. - Gary Smith stated that according to the bid plans on the FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 3 • • Cherry Lane remodel project the highway show 45 foot of property on the Reynolds but it jogs back to 40 feet in front of the church according to the plans of the reconstruction project. It means there is not 45 feet of right of way existing in front of the church. Mr. Simmons responded that it was his understanding that the additional right of way, where you see the jog, that is where the additional right of way was added and requested to allow for the intersection expansion if it ever happened. City Staff, at our first meeting on November 6, recommended that we touch base with ACHD and in fact we would agree that if they need the additional right-of-way along the west side of the property we will work with them and provide that if they really want that. The owner did not have a concern with that. So we don't have a problem if that is a condition. 8. That no person appeared at the hearing objecting to the variance application, and no other testimony was taken. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City has authority to grant variances pursuant to Section 11-2-419 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to Section 11-9-612 of the Development Ordinances. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 4 • • 3. That the City Council has judged this application by the guidelines, standards, criteria, and policies contained in the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and upon the record submitted to it and the things upon which it may take judicial notice. 4. That the Council may take judicial notice of its own proceedings, those of the Commission, .governmental statutes, ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and the State. 5. That the following provision of Section 11-9-612 A. 1., of the Zoning Ordinance is noted which is pertinent to the Application: 11-9-612 A. 1. PURPOSE The Council, as a result of unique circumstances (such as topographic - physical limitations or a planned unit development), may grant variances from the provisions of this Ordinance on a finding that undue hardship results from the strict compliance with specific provisions or requirements of the Ordinance or that application of such provision or requirement is impracticable. 6. That the specific requirements regarding a variance that must be evidenced and found by the City Council are as follows: 11-9-612 A. 2., FINDINGS No variance shall be favorably acted upon by the Council unless there is a finding, as a result of a public hearing, that all of the following exist: a. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; in such cases, the subdivider shall first state his reasons in writing as to the specific provision or requirement involved; FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 5 • • b. That the strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the subdivider because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other such conditions which are not self- inflicted, or that these conditions would result in inhibiting the achievement of the objectives of this Ordinance; c. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated; d. That such variance will not violate the provisions of the Idaho Code; and e. That such variance will not have the effect of nullifying the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan. 7. That the~® dose-s~gpe,n~r-t-e---be-.-~__~c~c-benefit--or- •-prof~t-; --eoonomi-e--ga-i-n---~r--convenience- to the--Applcant since -if -the va~ianse is n~+..-gar,~ted--the.---house-would---be --required- to- be--.moved wh~h--weu-ld--r-esquire- it--to --be- -demolished-and construction -started _~ver-,.---but - it--was -not ~ the Applicant that -created -the ordinance - ~ro-let~~y what-tke--ordinance---has--been---changed --since ~he- .~-subdi-vi-lion--plat was approved and the-house-setback now meets the ~~ty'-s= current--set--back-equ~ri~ -=-; ~-~ ~ it would be in the best interest of the City to grant the variance. 8. That regarding Section 11-9-612 A. 2. it is specifically concluded as follows: a. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of the 30 feet front street set-back requirement on a collector street would not be clearly be unreasonable, but ACRD had the opportunity to require that much of a set-back when it reconstructed a portion of the Ten Mile Road at the time it reconstructed Cherry Lane Road, but it did not require the 30 foot set-back at that time. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 6 b. That strict compliance with the requirements of the set- back requirements in effect at the time of the reconstruction of Ten Mile Road would result in extraordinary hardship to the Applicant as a result of factors not self-inflicted and if that much of a set back was required by ACHD it could have asserted that at the time that it widened that portion of Ten Mile Road. c. That the granting of a variance would not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area. in which the property is situated. d. That the variance would not have the effect of altering the interests and purposes of the front set-back requirement, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 9. That it is concluded the Application for a variance should be approved. APPROVAL OF FINDINQ~S OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby approve these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN MORROW COUNCILMAN BENTLEY COUNCILMAN ROUNTREE COUNCILMAN TOLSMA MAYOR CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) DECISION VOTED_ ~~ VOTED v VOTED VOTED , VOTED That it is decided the Application for a variance of 30 foot set-back on Ten Mile Road in effect is approved, but the Applicant shall allow a 25 foot set-back on Ten Mile Road and the front set- back shall be that distance. APPROVED: , DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 7 • CGI~iC SUSAN S. EASTLAKE, President GARY E. RICHARDSON, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary March 11, 1997 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridain, ID 83642 Re: MV-O1-97 1560 North Ten Mile Road The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) staff has received and reviewed the application and site plan for the item referenced above. This item will not be heard by the ACHD Commission unless the site plan is changed in such a manner as to require Commission review. All future design plans and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived in writing by the District. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 345-7662. Sincerely, Steve Arnold Senior Development Analyst cc: Project file Chron file ada c©unty highway district 318 East 37fih • Boise, Idaho 83714-6499 • Phor,e (208) 345-7680 Meridian City Council March 18, 1997 Page 21 Corrie: Thank you, anyone else from the public at this time? Council, any questions or comments? At the request of the developers, I would like to continue the public hearing with Council permission. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we continue the public hearing until April 1~ for the preliminary plat for Medimont Subdivision. Rountree: Second Corrie: The motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to continue the public hearing until April 1~ on the preliminary plat for the .subdivision, any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea FIVE MINUTE RECESS ITEM #5: PUBLIC .HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE SETBACK BY MERIDIAN LDS CHURCH: Corrie: I will now open the public hearing and invite a member of the Meridian LDS Church or representative to step forward. Steve Simmons, 1221 Shoreline Lane, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Simmons: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, we came with this application for direction in November to one of your previous meetings just. to get some sort of direction as to how we should approach this project which seemed a little bit of a nowhere zone and no one could give us a lot of direction on how we should proceed. Consequently with the direction we have received we have submitted for the variance of basically a 5 foot infringement into the required 30 foot setback on the west side of the property fronting Albertson's directly to the west and Ten Mile. We haven't received any negative comments from staff or any of the other utilities in their review and basically are just waiting for a decision. Corrie: Council, comments or questions of Mr. Simmons? Rountree: The only question I have i.s I have yet to figure out this drawing. Although I understand what you are doing. Simmons: Mayor Corrie and Councilman Rountree what we are trying to show is the setback, our violation is only a small portion of the building because of the additional right of granted to ACHD back when the building was originally built in I believe 89-90 in that time frame. So we are just showing the northwest corner is where the violation is Meridian City Council March 18, 1997 Page 22 and not the entire addition. It only happens because the jog is happening right in there and that top third of the north side. Rountree: I guess my question is this dashed line the roof line, is that what that is trying Simmons: That is the floor plan or the actual floor line. Rountree: This is the roof line (inaudible) And the cross hatched area is the infringement area. Simmons: Yes sir Corrie: Is there anyone else from the public that would like to issue testimony on request for variance? Crookston: I just have a question Mr. Mayor. Mr. Simmons do you know what the width of Ten Mile is going to be in front of the church? Simmons: Mr. Crookston, I do not, we had inquired about any additional right of way and didn't receive any comments that they want any further right of way in that. So we don't know when those changes would take place. So to answer you question basically I do not. Crookston: All I was thinking about was if we grant the 5 foot variance what happens when Ten Mile Road is widened in front of the church. Simmons: The original width was requested or right of way was requested to allow for that flaring of that intersection. We don't know when that is going to happen and our original letter to the Council we had also stated that the church would be willing to grant the additional five feet if required on the south side of the property. We haven't heard of a time frame as to when that is going to happen or even if it will happen. Morrow. (Inaudible) that is a section line road, the right of way will be a 90 foot right of way. The cross section of asphalt ultimately could be the same as Cherry Lane. Crookston: So what does that do with granting an additional 5 feet in the setback so then there would be a 25 foot setback. As I understand it they have a 30 foot required setback, they are asking for a variance of 5 feet for this portion so that would mean the setback would be 25 feet. Morrow: The new setback would be 25 feet that is correct. Crookston: I am just wondering how that fits in when the road is widened. Meridian City Council March 18, 1997 Page 23 Morrow: I think the presumption is that did not ACHD buy the right of way for the section of road for the 90 foot right of way for that portion across the front of not only the LDS church but the Reynolds property and is there not another little church to the south, Stonehouse. Wasn't the transition there pretty much the same as the Albertson's frontage? I guess let me rephrase the question then. The question would be is the five foot right of way that ACRD acquired would complete the 90 foot section, 45 feet on your side of center line which is the maximum right of way (inaudible) for that section line roads. Crookston: Are you going to build so that five feet helps in your building? Simmons: That is the reason we are asking for the variance, is we are five feet into the west setback on the top or I guess it would be the 3`d of the building to the north side which that illustration shows which Mr. Rountree was asking for some explanation on. So otherwise we wouldn't be asking for the variance. So you are correct Mr. Crookston that it would be a 25 foot setback. Crookston: Did you have some questions Shari, you were dragging the microphone. Stiles: Gary went to go get some plans on this project. If you remember this came about because they are in an R-4 zone which number one does not allow churches now, they wanted to get the building permit. One of the conditions of them getting a building permit was that they should dedicate that additional right of way. This drawing reflects only the 90 foot total right of way up to a point. Because Ada County Highway District has indicated it is not going to be 90 all the way it is going to flare closer toward the intersection. So that is why only a portion of that is shaded. Everything you see the addition part, that is what they want to add. I don't know exactly what Ada County Highway District comments were but I believe before they get the building permit they should dedicate that entire 45 foot for the entire piece of property. Corrie: Mr. Smith? Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members according to the bid plans on the Cherry Lane remodel project the highway show 45 foot of property on the Reynolds but it jogs back to 40 feet in front of the church according to the plans of the reconstruction project. Morrow. So what does that mean? Smith: It means there isn't 45 foot of right of way existing in front of the church. I don't know on this drawing that is being prepared by the architect I don't know where that (Inaudible) I don't know where the center line of road is in relation to the sketch that is being provided by the architect. Meridian City Council • • March 18, 1997 Page 24 Simmons: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council if I might address that. It is my understanding that the additional right of way, where you see the jog we show a 30 foot setback was granted and perhaps that is on the construction set that staff is looking at. That is where the additional right of way was added and requested to allow for the intersection expansion if it ever happened. Staff at our first meeting on November 6 recommended that we touch base with ACRD and in. fact we would agree that if they need the additional right of way along the .west side of the property we will work with them and provide that if they really want that, the owner did not have a concern with that. So we don't have a problem if that is a condition. Smith: Mr. Mayor, I think in looking. at the plans that the consultant had drawn up for the construction of Cherry lane Road. Where you see the 7 foot dimension on the architects drawing, from that point out to the centerline of Cherry Lane Road is 33 feet. Where the 7 foot jog then the dimension to Centerline of road is 40 feet. So if another 5 feet was purchased for the section line road that would decrease the setback to (End of Tape) Corrie: Any further questions? I think I asked before but in case I forgot is there anyone else from the public that would like to give testimony here? Hearing none I will close the public hearing, council discussion? Rountree: I was just going to ask what is the setback for a commercial lot is it 20 feet? Crookston: It depends on what zone it is in. Stiles: The front setback for a commercial zone would be 15 feet. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move we instruct the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact and conclusions. Bentley: Second Corrie; Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Bentley to instruct the City Attorney to draw up findings of fact and conclusions of law for the April 1~ meeting, any further discussion? Hearing none all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FULL SERVICE SALON WITH TWO STYLING STATIONS, NAIL TECHNICIAN AND MASSAGE THERAPY ROOM BY KELLI STEWART: Corrie: Kelli, would you please come up and give us a little background? MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 18,1997 APPLICANT: MERIDIAN LDS CHURCH ITEM NUMBER; 5 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REDUCE SETBACK AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: COMMENTS "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~~ ~~~ c ~~k '~ ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS . NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. WIL~CAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. LASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flre Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Pol(ce Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • H • UB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY ®F MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA E C GLENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION (208) 888-4433 • FAX~08) 887.4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Depattanent (208) 887-2211 KEITH BORUP Motor Vehicle/Drivers Lic:®se (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. ODiZRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY DF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk. by: March 11. 1997 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2126197 HEARING DATE: 3/18/97 REQUEST: Variance request for reduction of set back BY: Meridian LDS Church LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT:_ 1:560 N. Ten Mile ITen Mile and Cheny lanel JIM JOHNSON, P2 MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P2 GREG OSLUND, P/Z KEITH BORUP, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COEJNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPAlIt~RIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERM®UNTAIN GASP ELIM A FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMA R LIM & FINAL P T) CITY FILES ~ OTHEF~ YOUR CONCISE REMAR FEB281991 CtfY OF MERIDIAN WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Pollce Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY ®~ MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EE C G ENN R. B NTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887.4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 KEITH BORUP Motor Vehicle/DriveisLfcense (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: _ March 11, 1997 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2126/97 HEARING DATE: 3/18/97 REQUEST: Variance request for_reduction of set back BY: Meridian LDS Church LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR .PROJECT: 1560 N. Ten Mile (Ten Mile and Cherry lane) JIM JOHNSON, P2 MALCOLM MACCOY, P2 JIM SHEARER, P2 GREG OSLUND, P2 KEITH BORUP, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C ,-GLENN BENTLEY, C/C .-WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT -BUILDING DEPARTMENT ,FIRE DEPARTMENT ,-POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: o~ ' ~ ~o ~ ~ `7 YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: CENTRAL C •• DISTRICT ~'1'HEALTH DEPARTMENT DISTRICT HEALTH DEPAR'1141ENT Environmental Health Division Return to: Rezone # Conditional Use ## Preliminary /Final /Short Plat /s ~ a N - 7-,~N ~lic.~ . ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden city ..~ Meridian ^ Kuna ^ Acz 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ^ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ^ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ^ central water ^ 10. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ I I. Stormwater disposal systems shall be reviewed by relative to: ^ Waste Disposal ^ Injection Well rules. ^ Groundwater Protection ^ 12. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 13. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 14. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ^ 15. Date: '~ / 3 / 9 Reviewed By: CDHD 10/91 ~~, n.. ~~9s Review heel Wi2LIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • COUNCIL MEMBERS Tv A Good Place t~oj Live WALT W. MORROW, President CI i 1 ®~ ~j.%~ RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE ~ ry ~ ~ ~ ~LENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO I MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83 P & Z COMMISSION (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 587-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-221 7 KEITH BORUP Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE NAi~t ~A ~ ~ ~ ~ i p IAN MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor . IR~{IGATIO~I QIS°I k~i~.7 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: _ .March 11. 1997 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/26/97 HEARING DATE: 3/18/97 REQUEST: Variance request for reduction of set back BY: Meridian LDS Church LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 1560 N. Ten Mile (Ten Mile and Cherry lane/ JIM JOHNSON, P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P2 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GREG OSLUND, P2 ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION -KEITH BORUP, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH -ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR ~NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT -CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) -WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) -GLENN BENTLEY, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) -WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) -SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: -POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY DEAR COMMISSIONERS: CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER THE NAMPA & MERIDIAN TRRTGATTON DTSTRTCT HAS N COMMENT ON THE ABOVE RF.FF.R F.NCF A .TCATTnN_ NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT ** TX CONFIRMAT~REPORT ** AS OF MAR 17 '9~~43 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 06 03/17 11 40 3449002 MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDtt STATUS EC--S 02'33" 005 088 OK MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: March 18.1997 APPLICANT: MERIDIAN LDS CHURCH ITEM NUMBER: S REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: RE6IUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO REDUCE SETBACK AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ' ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH; SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS . NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: ' IDAHO POWER: US UVEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION; Post-itA Fax Note 7671 oafa3-1~,9~ ~~s- r To ~~~ From n' hR CoJDopt. / ~ Co. pho~ p Phone M Fax # 3y 4,q~2 Fax M OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shell become property of the City of Meridian.