Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Dakota Ridge Estate Subdivision VAR
OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANIC~ L. SMITH, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SFiARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY . A Good Place to Live CIr['Y OF MERIDIAIOT 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor O N I MFMB ac WALT ~V. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMITH TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Willl Berg, City Clerk by: _ July 29, 1997 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 7/10/97 HEARING DATE: 8/5 /97 REQUEST: Variance for Dakota Ridge Subdivision BY: Max Boesiger Inc. LOCATION OF PROPERTY OAR PROJECT: S. of Ustick and 1/2 mile West on Ten Mile Road JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z RON MANNING, P2 BYRON SMITH, P/Z KEITH BORUP, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C _GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: I~EC~I~'~D JUG 1 1 ~~~~ CITY 0~ ~I~I~I~le~l C CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 VARIANCE APPLICATION (RE: NAME: nrtnx a INC. (Owner or holder of valid option) ADDRESS : 2447 S. VISTA, BOISE, IDAHO 83705 T F WF~T OF m~n1 MTT F. ROAIL- GENERAL LOCATION : SOUTH OF USTICK AND ONE HALF ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A PORTION OF GOVII2NN~NT ~' 2. SECTION 3, DIAN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO T 3N, R 1W, B.M., MERI PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTaOhed,A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be att PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION R-4 VICINITY SKETCH: A vicini~eetspexistingaandaproposedbzoningCand showing property lines, st such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A lilrectly acrossot he streetrfroma addresses within contiguoug to, d ro osed for a Variance and within a 300' radius of the parcel(s) P P must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor} DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: A VARIANr'F' Fnu RF~tTIRED 80_' LOT 19, BLK 3 AND LC7I'S 4 & 5, BLK 6 ) : A VARIANCE OF FRONTAGE ON THREE LOTS (~ ,~ MAXIM[JM BLOCK LENGTH OF 1000 FEET FOR BLK 4 YG.c ! S I GNATURE : ---~ CITY COUNCIL RECORDS Date Received Received BY. Meridian Zoning Ordinance) City Council Hearing= • REQUIREMENTS: VARIANCE Attach a site plan showing all details of the proposed development. Complete the following questions and return with the application. 1. What is intended to be done on or with the property? A 90-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 2. What special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district? SEE ATTACHED LETTER (#12). 3. Why will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance deprive you of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance? SEE ATTACHED T,F:RTPF'R ( #14) . 4. What special conditions or circumstances exist that were not a result of your actions? SEE ATTACHID T.F'1'1'FR (#18). 5. Why will the granting of this Variance not confer on you any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures, or building in the same district? SEE ATTACHED T,F.RTPF:R ( #19) . a ~ VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR DAKOTA RIDGE SUBDIVISION 1. Address for subject property: 3875 W. Ustick Road 2. Applicant: Max A. Boesiger, Inc. 2447 S. Vista, Boise, Idaho 83705 Phone: 336-2001 3. Property Owner: Leonard A. and Freda N. Aschenbrenner, 3875 W. Ustick Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642, Phone: 888-2689 4. Deed and affidavit of legal interest attached. Legal description attached. 6. Property is currently in agricultural production and occupied with one single family dwelling and accessory buildings. 7. The applicant is proposing a 90-lot single family dwelling development. 8. Zoning District: R4 9. Vicinity Map attached. 10. Single family dwelling are proposed. The variances requested are unrelated to the building pads or setbacks. 11. List of property owners within 300-feet is attached. 12. Characteristics of the subject property which prevent compliance with Ordinance: An existing 15-inch concrete sewer line traverses the parcel in a north-south direction along the east boundary. The subdivision was designed to accommodate the existing sewer trunk line. The City Engineer requires a separate lot for any sewer line not within a public right-of--way. To satisfy this requirement a separate micro-path and sewer lot was designed in Block 3 (lot 9). This required a reduction of the frontage requirement on lot 19, Block 3 from 80-feet to 50-feet. This lot is excessively large with a square footage of 18,726.8. We believe the large lot size and the existing sewer location provides justification for a variance of the frontage requirement. A separate sewer lot (lot 6, Block 6) accommodates the existing sewer line. This sewer lot prohibits road frontage for lots 4 and 5, Block 6. We are proposing a shared driveway concept for these two lots. The 30-foot sewer lot would be paved and a perpetual ingress/egress easement for the two lots would be provided. A shared driveway access is a commonly used method of ingress/egress when accessibility is hindered. 970210\variance-app • The request for a variance of the maximum block length of 1,000-feet for Block 4 is justified since the configuration of the school site creates a long block. We have provided a micro-path (lot 10, Block 4) as a pedestrian connection for Block 4. The pathway would connect the elementary school with the subdivision. The intent of the maximum block length is to minimize the walking distance between blocks for pedestrians. By providing the micro-path a pedestrian connection has been provided. We request the City Council consider the facts and justifications provided for approval of the variance requested. 13. Ordinance requirements: Section 2-410(a) "Minimum Street Frontage 80"'. Section 9-605(e) "Blocks....blocks shall not be....more than one thousand feet (1,000') in length." Section 9-605(c) "Pedestrian Walkways: right-of--way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping area; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide. 14. If the request is not granted a hardship would be imposed on lots (Lots 18 and 19, Block 3) by creating a 34,998.6 square foot lot. Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 6 would require consolidation creating a 28,555.4 square foot lot. This situation would dictate excessively large lots not consistent with the other lots in the development. If we were required to add a stub street to Block 4 to break up the block length this could potentially disrupt the site plan for the School District. Based upon the two access points and the fact that the school must be located in the southeast portion of the school parcel for sewerability, the additional stub street would connect to the play ground. A street intersecting the playground is not a preferable situation. 15. The unusual circumstances of this parcel are the existing sewer trunk line and the school parcel. 16. Typically a development is designed for a parcel which has no existing improvements (ie. Sewer) within its boundaries. The design was restricted by the existing sewer trunk and creative ideas were used to develop the property without disruption of the sewer trunk. The school parcel configuration was dictated by sewer depth and the needs of the School District (ie. width, depth and size). The school parcel location creates a long perimeter, therefore, the block length exceeds the maximum criteria. 17. A literal interpretation of the provisions of the ordinance would defy reason when one considers the effect of these requirements on the development as discussed in previous questions. 970210\variance-app • • 18. Special conditions attributed to the parcel are the existing sewer line and the elementary school parcel. 19. If the City Council were to grant the variance for the standards previously mentioned, it would not constitute a privileged treatment of the parcel. The problems associated with compliance with the ordinance are unique and would justify similar waivers for a project which encountered these issues. 20. The variance request is confined to standards within the Zoning Ordinance and not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. 21. Fee attached. 22. Briggs Engineering will post the site as required by Ordinance. 970210\variance-app • AilrlhOAYtT CF LEGAL INREREBT• STATE OF IDAHO ) CpUt+i'T"~' OR ADA } 1 Len-~~ ~ ~'~or~~ Qs~~e~ ~r~cHker Name, - Addresz ~! e ~ c' u( c"a ~ -~ c~u l~ v , b~inti first duty sworn upon {may} (state) aath, deposo and Gay thsb 1. That i m~ the record cwnsr of th8 property deatxfbed on the attached, vtd I grotto my permi~iott to Wt d. x- d ~ o c s ~ . e l; rw G . .2 yy 7 .`. ~i yea ~ a ~ s c , ~ , --- (eddr+eea} (name} ttr Gubmit the acoampanytrtg apR~tlon pertalnirsa to that proporty. 2 ! s9rae to lndemnl~, defend artd hold City of Meridian amd it"s emplayess harmiess Nam any claim or 1labiftty resuhtng from any diapubs as to ths statarnaits corrtatned herein or as to the ownarrshlp of the prcp®rbr which is thQ subj~d of the applkatjon. Dated this _ f a _..,. d8Y of ~~-~- - --• 19 `' ~ .,~.. ~L~'~C~H.tr s =~gl lam V f 9UBSCRfi3Eb AND SWORN ~ before me ~s dsy and yes-ilrst abate written. ,~-+'gt4,1~ B 08s .,r~~~e~e~~'~1~~~ NOt~ Z...~ ~"° "'~' ~ ' M ~ MY Commission Expo' ~~'~? f ~ ~,~pU~ L~G~'~ ~i~8pg~9 • DESCRIPTION FOR DAKOTA RIDGE SUBDIVISION May 8, 1997 Description of proposed Dakota Ridge Subdivision, being a portion of Government Lot 2, Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Government Lot 2 (north 1/4 corner) of Section 3, T. 3N., R. 1W., B.M., thence S 0°27'37" W 25.00 feet to a point on the southerly right-of- way of Ustick Road, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Thence S 89°06'21" E 1,320.42 feet along said right-of-way to a point on the east line of said Government Lot 2; Thence S 0°26'04" W 1,342.08 feet to the southeast corner of said Government Lot 2; Thence N 89°01'50" W 771.04 feet along the south line of said lot to the southeast corner of a proposed school site: along the boundary of said proposed school site the following; Thence N 0°58'10" E 61.07 feet to a point; Thence N 0°00'00" E 347.57 feet to a point; Thence N 17°00'00" E 108.69 feet to a point; Thence N 0°53'39" E 254.00 feet to a point; Thence N 74°57'26" W 111.04 feet to a point; Thence N 47°00'00" W 339.34 feet to a point; Thence N 89°32'23" W 223.11 feet to a point on the west line of said Lot 2; Thence N 0°27'37" E 321.03 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description, this proposed subdivision comprising 28.64 acres, more or less. Michael E. Marks, P.L.S., No. 970210uegal.des (1) 07 N fp y y 07 ~ D A y .~ A A A A ~~~ O7 D A ~ A ~ A .'1. A O~ ~ ~ ~ y A A ~ ~ y A ~ ~ A A A ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ D 9 ~ ~ :J .7i ~ A 01 Ol ~ p eaS S O O~ ~N ~~(~ ~S~ ~ ~ ~N ~~O ~~~m~~ ~ ~mq ~ NNNN NN NNNN N N N NNNNNNNNNN N +> a a N W W W W N W W W W W W W W W W W W W 41 ~ W W W W W W W N N~ a aA s W NNNO NNNNNNNNNONNNNNNNNN NNNNC~IO t0 D~O~ Sm ~ SSSm S ~ S m SOr ~D mmS~S OrS V ~A ~ a a a a~ a a a a a a a a a~ a a s a a a a a a a a a a _ N N N Nm N N N N N pm N Nm N Nm N pm Ntp N N m as a W a W N Nm N01m NOINmm01 m01 OINNOINmmN0lmNrNNNN ~ ~ O ,^,^ ,^ ~~ O~ O O ~00 aNr a W W a W a N N W N NN N ~1 N p N a 7~ N N N N N N N N N W g a_ S_ a_ __ _ a_ _ __ a e0 tD m V_ mm m O O_ O ~ O C O Npp O O s~ II~~ O ppp 0 0 0 0 0~$~ O ~ !ap pp S 000000 N m/11 NNNONN 8m171N (0111 f0J11NN mm ~ NOa ~S N N~aapN O N O V (11 N m 0 ~~..++ r W N a O O m m V m W J L~ N1 m V m ~O O+ N W to C fffDDD a (T N V O r OI N f0 m V m+ W tT a W N O O W N O C D A aW,~ r m N N a O m 0 IJ O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 0 0 0 0 Vt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O v m N m D W N N N N N+ N G ppp I V N I V N QQ N N N NNN p N 01 I V N N N N N N I J N N p N C O aa p C O01 ~p D Y1a171N mN W t0 m~ a01 W vm.N.~.N.~Nm~rmN171 V ~ 0004tmm ~tDtONmaa t0 N rDa V ~0 V mm ONO V NNO N W OaNA V N V mr r0 m V mm tOm a W Nmi71 C0 W NN Nm W NmNm V NaNN V NmOSO W N NNN~~~t~tOOO0000/ 10 N<J1 ~rm~- ~- mAyA-m /nyZ<mmm mmm947 Am_(Ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm<mmmmmD~O mOA0~0 ~-~-z-+ ~~mD~~~0;~~~~--mc~ ~-azzzzzzz22zzzzzzzzzzzzOZZZZZy-~ ~m--rS m~m~Am~mm rmmm 2-myyAaD ~mmAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAr x r-r.--~r---O~y.~-mm~mr~ rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr~~rrr~~rrrrrT?~ 5~2-2 2 Z mz 22 22zz 222 O 022 m A O y 2 y m ~ m ~ y m~ m m A m m m m 3 ~; RI m m A p O m Z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m A m m m m m Z y A y7C20y0 o v o=ooO~ooo m mQAAaATrpmo~ p~p~ o0 000aagg00000 p~ pp~ 0000 ~p zm~cZiO~czi mmmm~mzmmzvmmm~A~Am~z=AO7mmrr10~00~00~000000000 O 800000 m~ 22r=T D ~~ m tnm C<<Om0?<~ -yCpfOaA~0000000000000000000000ZO0000Z2 mmmADD rOrp~~a' ~~~rrmU2l ZfZ' OOay~10Z r~AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmAAAAA2 ~••1~Zm2 O~OD OSOOC,-000 .y`~ AA7cOy>aD ~O'-mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmam 7tmya~Q1 3 ~2a;A~~<r~~; CQ'C~~T7 ~~AZ7C~ xxx7mCx x7mC x7mCxxxxxxx7mCxxxx x7mc x 7mc 7mCmC aa7..x~ ~ z ~i°zzpAZZZ ~m~zov'"o°z°~Z~ oooooa~ov~~vo~OOyoo~o mmmmmg~x mD m .,~ m~=~~z ~.~~ A_~ m~A O mmmmmm mrt~ mm m(f~Cmrr~m m CCCCC gym D r r r<rrA rrr OmOr mm r « «~« « « « «< « « mmmmmm 2 Z r r rrc.rrp rrr 2AZr y~ r AAAArAAAAAAAAAAA~AAAA 9~'O~~ A~m m A A mA AA3 AA AZA r. -1 A 00000000000000000000 ma~m~0 O -~ -1 ~ A DA ~y zmmmmmmmzmmAAm~m•OmmzA OOOOOD <Om p D Z -'A 001 ~~y~A~'7v ~~~~~~~'9m~'9~~ mmmm°ma -CO O ~ OO~o ~ O OOOOOm O O O 2 > m m O O ~ <~ Imp NNf/~1NN D N A A -Ai ZT y y1/7 lAHNm T T ~ - o- ~' zAs ~ c0ic0ic4ic0igi m m 2°~m ~ ~~~~~ O O A~ 2 2 2 2 2 2 ~ -{ { A nAAAn C C m IR 1/7 H ~ m m m rn W W W aA a tT W m W Ntr NtrmmmUOf mN ppa h amN N N m p rC m W mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm rmmmm W+rrrr W AD ~mm O ~ O m~T w Nm W mmmmmmmj ®IV71~m+~ a00 N V mm 1~1 ~71 G71 ~~mm ~~ Om ~• ~01 ~ ~ P ~s~omm iSS gg V ~~ N O O O I T O m m 0 a m O N O O S W m 10 10 /0m~ O~ O f C m m m m m m m m m~ m N m m m m m N N N N N i 71 N O 2~fff~ moma2m2mm"mmmm~f2~m-r-~mz~z~mm~f~~~~ff~~~~~~~fr~~~~crr..rr~~m -1 mDmD-~m~mmDmmmmcAiAmmmOA00 mm ~ ~'~~`L~~ y mCCCCC rSr2CrCrrmrrrrp=C=rmam m-3rrmmmmmmmmmmOmOmmmmOmommOmOm~ OooCCy ~~~A~~ <m<D<m<<D~m<~<m<¢m¢m<m<mGmCC<m<m~mp<mC<~c>iS~S~~<Q2Cm<~<7O~70007O~7O~~OC7O~7O~70~070~070~7O~7O7G~7OCA7O357O57OCO~~AAAAf~A mzmmAZ mmmmSm~mmDm~mmAr~rr^OVZImn~msmm<c~<<<<<<~<~<<<<`2555~0~~`2~~Am A00000 D m ~A~Am mmmm<2DZmmaO-~ m7~m mfilmmmmmmmmmmmmmRlmOmmmm 0000 00 v v O <o<oo~oovvg < 0 Ao~<mov~~~~~~~g~~~gffgfog~~~ ooCO7oo y ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~< ~ ~ O~ O D yi yd O O O O O O O O O O v O Q O 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 y y H N y m m jm~mm mmmm ~ m r- < m zmmAAmommmAm~~z~-~A~m~ -~-+-+•~1 m m m mm mmmm m ~7 m m g ~~~;~; D; D;~ D~ D D m D D D D;; 3; D A A~ m 7C m ~ D D m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ;mmmm m ; A mmmmmm yymyymm m Oyyyy mm m rDDmOCOmy 000OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOmO0000~m- zmamma 2A2ma~a~~-Z2~~mAmm~ r'A-2-m2~---------------------z- az~ DO_D O Q O 0 0 ~ O~ O O~ D OD ~~ m~~~~ D OD y Oy O G~ O O O m D m D pD ~~ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m p m m m m m p ypy_ Z 2 2 Z 2 2 ~ Z A 2 Z~ Z~ p ~~~ A Z Z Z 2~~~ 2 Z~~ 2 2 2 ------ A-A- A-AA-AAAA-- -Q-- ----AA- --------------------------Ol 000000 O 00 O O 0000 OOCO000 00000000000000000000000000000 tp N_ Ipm7t fmmmJ frail ~ W fQ.mQ~7i ft01~7ft1 l~0.m7ti ft(J~.1 (mmd trail (t01~1 frail (.N1 (.Ni J ~ (i07~1 (N~ [(.711 (Qmll immil tml fmi/ N !mJ iml ~ V Wm V tmJ ~ fOJI frail frail frail 4mi W tmJ trail W 4mi frail 4mi unit imil frail W 4m1 fmd fmi/ V W 4m7 f=ml tmJ imi/ W fmJ 4mi fmt trail ~ L aSaAa O aO L S OaO O g O O O O N N mN OI fJ~~ a~ S r~4440iii 4f V V V V $Q Vj V `Q$ V ~Q Vj V V V ~Q Vj V V V V V V $ygj V V `l' V V V V V aO) tN71 (Nt1 fN71 fN]14NI fN71 NNNNiNit N4Ni NN mN N NNS ~NOrN N ~ S NO~~ ~~ y ~M ~(~~~~(~~ ~ ~ Q ~`~'~~~gg ggg N aN a a A ooW myp mIO pWW t_O (pt (p~ (pt pf (p.~oW SQQ mOI m(p~NN 8Q Gtm (p~BQ """~~" 2233 ~j $$ ~j ss sS Sas a S 88888(4•ifa tOO OImt+~QWS ~QO$~Q~S Q$05~~~5 MOIDOO~OO~QO$OOjQ+$~Qj $Qr~ O r,~OI V O$QmS .i$QWJ$OO W iJ ~QW$ 4f W 24Q$f W tJ W W W 47 W (J 4/41 41 ?4Q~14f 41 ~Q$ ~Q$~Q+S y y y y y y r r r~ r r r r r r r r r~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r m r r r r v r r r r r r r r r r r mmmmmm 000 OOOOOOOOODO000000000000 0000 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOm AAAAAA 11-i~~1-~-~-i-i1-i1A-1 -l i ~ii ti~1-1-i-1-111-111~1~-ii-~-~~-1-1-1-~-i-~1~-1~~~~~~-1 -iA W W W W W (4.77 N N m~ V N m (~ r W W W 47 >Jy m+ r r r r r r r r r j tk O r N m V t0 -+ m r ~7t m V a m 171 + W a W N N r r r+ r N W~ a a A a a a m a m O N W• O r N W a m m V m m O O mrm m m-' m mmmm mm m'mmmmmmmmmmo~mmm''mm z+ aaaaa mmr rmrmrmmmm rmmmmmmmmmmmm rrrr rrmrmrrrrrrrrrr rrrmrr Z Z Z Z 2 2 r r 7~ ~ 7~ r 7~ r 7t r r r r 7~ r r r r r r r r r r r r~ 7C 7C 7C 7C ~ 7C 7C r 7C r' 7t 7~ 7C 7C 7! 7f 7~ 7C X 7C 7C 7c 7c 7C r 7c 7c ~ _ _ _ _ 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7t 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C 7C .. ~ ~ r a ~ r 7C r a a r a a W r a a a r N N ~ a r C CG <tC C NN m00N mN m NNNN~mp11TUNmm171171 m 17f 171 UI~ Qr a a ~ << G G<< N i N a = m m a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ 1 1 1 11p7 1p7 17p 1p7 ~ QNj~ CO U~O 8~ Oi 07 ,5 CCOO N 77 {p7 1 1p OW r~7 ~~®~Qi t+~1 S CCC aa g ~71 ^ ~ _ Q( `,Q^,' ~~-~ W N W +W W W ~ T 0011 ( ~ m 07171 /71 [/J W S NyOO 1Tm NNm mm W W 0o ~ p1~NCW7 W S O V /71m m 10 rommm m ~ ~ ~ ~`17~7a y a cn`~ JAI.1-'i-1??~ 14=~~ ~yEER TITLE E'er:-RD4~ ass-ti-wxR.-rxTD~_- •'~..~ ». • 2nd• :..~ ...~. _. ":..~.r.., ...+.• Jan ~ ~.. ._. •~- ~iX day of ~~ , TtII,g IIVDEN'r.~+ Made this tlLaa htmd-ad sod fifty-Lxo , betweaa ~ ' is the ye.r of our Lord oas ~+~ Frec D• Hoteldt and Cecelis tioteldt, husband sad Mite: I' ~ . qty, of Ada , , Stds of tdaho . ~ ~ of Mez•f.diaa, the gart tea of t>de first part, sod • '~ husband LeArsard A. Aaeaeabrenaer and Freda Nadine i.schenbrenner, ~~~ and rite qty ~ Caarotl , 9tatR oe Idahe • ~•; K Nampa, '! i ~ ~ pat{ i®a of t>Sa aocotsd park ' [cc sad in was ~ r>ha spas et WlLrtF3sL~7ct3. Thac tlt~ said Po+tsaa of the first part. `~ FiFtoen Thousand Fire Hundred and Na/100 - - - - - - - %i lawful m~ey ct the VniEed States ~ ,lmsria-, to them is bad P~ h the ,arid f i ~ wt,ee~aa[ Sa l+osebY tr~OwledS°4 ba v e gastRd, basgsit-ed ~:; put tee a1 the aeooad part. the rem ~. ootne9 ~ c06t~ tmto the aafd pasd es ~;~ sad,eold. arfd b7 tlreaa prtaeata do fit' tea' forevv. all of the LoIlow9a[ det~~ed real wRata. ~i of the seosnd Fas't• s+~ to them CoaaLyr o! ~~ Ada , Stste of Zdabo.:~rwit: 1 : situated ia. ChQ ,' T Three l3) North, mange ~' ~ Lot 'i~w (2) in 3ectioa Three (3), oNnship ~: Zdaho, EXCcPT that `' One (l,~ west of the Eoise IKeridian, in Ada CountYr t' ~ portion thereof deeded to the Boise valley Traction Company• ~': ts, ditches and rights of *~Y for ~!+ .Together xith all Mater rigt: `~ n or used in connection therewith• `~~ d~.tches thereto beJ.on&L B ~ ~ ~ - :~ ~ ~ , ~ i. . ~ '' v' J .~ ~, g . Nrr .~ .~ `~ " 1' hee'adtLaatafA a6d oP 1 Ff ~., With all sad smiWl+r the Oeoam~v',evastams. rsa+s~s s~ its F ;( ~r is .scY°~ mss' ~ ~ sad fatrre+,C 1n and to tb,a aald p~~ sa saf •7aiitea ,sa~d,ptroa3ta tdaaeot: sad ~ aataae. ~ zit Daft tom t) ia]a~ HAY~AI'1D TQ H4t~~bnie+wd ~ m° sba~ m~:e heir bdr+ sad ~ L~e.~ ~! .. ~~ ~ ~ d the ~ ~e said Ds~'fM' fa tLa lofat sad peao~ b ' i i • ~~. ~ ~`' sad t,Aeir the sak! past . Ls+lYl ti o[ ~ aab ~ i~ ~ ~ part. their ~siO'd ~ ~~wbomaowK ~~; ~ sad svtry pu'O° p~iD. ~:s of or ~~~ ~h~~ ~ w~ W>R1k1bYl' .ad 1rt ~+aa ]tau tae*st P.~72.0~ JAN-~1-.5QT 14:~~1 ~~IEER TITLE E~~_RC~k~ • ji; EYCEP'r all resRrvaoians 'to ci,a vait.ni~~'c®'~ra as conaainsd"in 'ino ~• ?atEnt for said lands; aLo oxcept construction and otta~ allghi hway ~ ~~ iarigatioa and dra£aa`+ of said lands; also except anY ~ ofgwa ~; am irrigation d:atriot bonds, sad sap a~ all existing righ Y i for;. roads and ditchoa along or upon said lands; also except all Laxes, doss and aasessotsat:s of arory kind andrtiosrheretntbavc as,;umed zed •i? thereaPLar; all oL t~tsich rife second Pa , in agreed tc paY, and also .excopt a NorLgage fo* 3 6i~00.00 roes here- ` fawr of t+be Ccattgs Mutual Li.a Company. trhl.ch the second pa • ~~. in have also assumed xnd agreed. ~ PgY• ,~ of JN wtT.~ wntB:EtDOT.'T!m ~a4d P~ ie a at eae !tom past ha re b««wto eet their head s sad see1. a tW day sad rar tl~•at,m wtittea. fi041o~0, aea:.m wso' asetdrl4tt~ ~ ~~° °• o _ .. Cseat3 Y w.....~-....•~.. - ~.~ ....._.~..._.._~...___...~•^_~'•~•..~...._..._...-~.- [.9011 STATL~ OF IDAHO, ..: /7 Cogcty oL ~~ JJ ~ ~ ~ 1g~J be[ore ~ F . •T ~J '~- Oa this , oJje~ daY ~ . s liossr7 P,+biio ? i m and for slid 3taL. Pei'1°°~'uy sPt~~ Fred D• gofeldt and Cecelia Ho..*eldt, tun- °i based and xife, witbiao~~ad la+owa w me to 6e the P~Oa s whore Dames aro lubl~ibed to the arSenawledged-to za. that they ~~ ~ °~°`' the ~y asd ~h7pF, I baN hesvuata »et saU' head ~'t1l~aed mn ~'1 ~• . ~IIt-14i'INE~ year hs lals cettiteate ¢est lb~.'ve 'ivrttia~• ~ -----_ . Notar7 E'+~ foe the 8•stn :oi Idaho, R~~ ~ ~ Iash4• .. . ~ ~ ~ "~r i ~ of ~ a , i i ~ i ~ ~ . .G ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~$ fi : ~ "W ~' ~ i i ~ s D i l r :,,,,~: i i i :~ ~: ,a ~ y Y .raswoR _ ..... .. .:. :; 1! it i.~ i B s i ij TOTAL F•~33 600 N 0 O 't Q. BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. cz~ ~a-s~oo »» s o, su~~ sao ease, iaaio e3~os 1200 I- - ~ ~ ,'. -~ ~ .a ~ r,, _ ~ .' e SITE _ -- ~crrnaa~raFmsvu - _ i~ ~: DAKOTA RIDGE SUBDIVI SI ~I NE 1 /4 SEC. 3, T3N, R1 W, B.M. o~c~ ow~r' scams air auuc. ra. BIB 1" =600' 06/27/97 970210 REMSION Feet I y~i LETTER CF TRANSMITTAL BRIGGS ENGINEERING, Inc. 1111 So. Orchard St., Suite 600 Boise, Idaho 83705 PHONE: (208) 345-2$81 FAX N0: (208) 345-2950 TO ~:t ~ d~ ~-r~-ra~~~/ ~/ll</~lCr '~l~T ~rr~ : .1'~~n.-i art ~~s C~9'~VE ARE SENDING YOU ^ WE ARE RETURNING DATE ~ ~? ! 7 ID N0. ~ 7da'~d JOB NAME ~'3~ifi4'T.~' ~/,~ ~/1- JOB ADDRESS qTY, STATE ^ SHOP DRAW/NGS ^ CHANGE ORDER ^ COPY OF LETTER ^ PLANS ^ OR/G/NALS ^ FINAL PLA T ^ SPEC/F/CA TONS ^ C PU TER D/SK ~C ~ - OTHER ~, ^ ENCLOSED ^ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ^ FEDERAL EXPRESS OURIER COPIES DATED ID N0. DESCRIPTION (~ f~?4'T~tiI,F~IT / ~ ~7/i o ~ L ~~- L ~~:rL~J' T Gr,1'T ~r /~~-rr, d' ~/~r wi ~ N fed ~ l ~ D~S~-r/~7ahl '/2 X /l ~' ~~T ESE ARE TRANSMITTED ~S CHECKED BE OW ~~ ^ FOR APPROVAL ^ APPROV£D AS S(/BA//TIfO ^ RESY/B~//T G~/ES fOR APP~PO~AL ^ FA+P J?X/R /NFORA/A1KIN ^ APRROVFD AS NO1E0 ^ S7/BA//T COPES fd1R OSIR/B!/1XON ^ .gS REQYlE51fD ^ RETURNED ft7R CORRECIXX~A~S ^ R£7URN Gb/PRECIID PR/N75 fOYP REI9EIY AND C01/A/ENT ^ PR/CE" ^ FOR B/OS DUE REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED ~- ~ ~ NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on August 5, 1997, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Max Boesiger Inc., for a Variance application for land located in a pprtion of Government Lot 2, Section 3, T.3N, R.1 W, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located South of Ustick and'/ mile West of Ten Mile Road. The Application requests a variance to the 80' lot frontage requirement on three lots (Lot 19, Block 3, Lots 4 & 5, Block 6) and a variance to the maximum block length of 1000 feet for Block 4 for Dakota Ridge Subdivision. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 18`h day of July, 1997. LLIAM G. BERG, JR., C ERK PUBLISH July 18 and August 1, 1997. I~ ~~+11~~1~®'ill l ~~~€1~~~~F~~~~g~g~g~gg~~~~~g~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ a' ~tl ~~ $~ 03 '- g ~ ,9 ~~s^t ~ v ~5 ~~~ f~ `k ~~~ O o u~ <A §~~~ A ~ ~~ m^ D Na•1c. ~5 p ~ R ug ~r 9~ ~ o ~3~ ~ ~ ~~~g g ~ s ~ €~ ~~ F ~ _ 1 ~'~~ o ~ ~Ip~ ~ ~ 5 ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~; ~ ~ o ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ `= x? ~ ~ 8 s ~ 8 ~-~--i a~ ~ N g A uNnuneo yq~fiFF ZONH ~ RT ~° ~_ _~ isms _J111A RunEOOE u~1u J- gw ~ I 4 N ~ F ~ O "I I ~~F ~> I~ Aye 99 ~ g a~~ ~~ " a 0~ { • $ _ ~~ ~ + V ~ 1 ~I =p ' €$ N 002YSY E 721.03' ~>I i r r ~w~ ,j,; fi CN } R ~ 1fY ^ u ~a , ~. ~ ~ `~ ~ P t ~ + ~ is N • ~ 7 Q . S.` ii I ^^ r OOVO'00' E 347.67 N 1~, ~~ ? $ t C~ ii IOk6p~f N 004J'30• E~I3 "a d •Y n' ra' 284.00' I I I IR '~ ra 'ti I ~ N ~ ~• ~a $ E~ ~ i RE - -I I ~ ~~ o •" _ NA 1 Q~ r - ~ ~ r ~ ra ~ Sgrr Pfi 4 A ~ ` fi ~• E L- I I I~~ ~ fi tt~`aY 6 ~~ - ttliA -t~'aR rw !P fi I 1 ~ 'li~ ~ P~ F O g• rga E+ ppa qKK !o a i ~• t ~_- ~ ~IF~ -~ 3o V - *~ Co Bp w ~a a k•t pra rw s ~a u n / / ~ R r ~ ~ M rM r l0I M fi GN 101 11 • i p V _ { m ~/~~~~ u r E'o 4'y~8~' ~ qMu = r fi rr ~ R ~ o ~~,~ ~ - ~ v1A ~ ~g - g4 ~~ Ef -~ I ~ III L--- ~P- ~~~~ a'ra $ ~~ ~~ i• ~a ~a ~a ~,a ~°""~ ~~~ m I. w 1 1 I I I I 4 I I --1--1---1--1---J--#- -- -------r---7-{=} --,-- ~I~ ~I~ ur+ruArlm a I I. I ~ I ZON[ ~ R4 - I --+-- ~ ~ // I CRE~C EiTA /lES/~UWIVIi1QN\ Q 7 (I 1 i \ ~ ~ ~ / ' \ZQNg ~ R4 ~~ 'Ir \ / _ II ~I / \~/ )'/ Y/ it g ,~ 3. r ~ Meridian City Council August 19, 1997 Page 14 Smith: That is good then because the sewer is kind of deep in that area. No other comments. Corrie: Thank you Mr. Smith. Anything else? Thank you very much. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the hook up for Gary and Margaret Palmer at 3195 N. Linder. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Morrow. Mr. Mayor, Mr. Crookston advises me that I should have had a sentence in there indicating that they need to pay the double hook up fees.. Tolsma: I will approve that amendment. Corrie: The amended motion then on the double hook up to be~ added to that, any further discussion? Smith: Mr. Mayor and Councilmen, Mr. Palmer will need to come into Public Works and pick up and application, fill that out. I don't know if they are aware of that before they make this connection or not but that is where the fees are paid and the application is filled out. Come: The amended motion has been made and seconded, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: So if you go into Mr. Smith's office, they will take care of that for you. ITEM #6: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR DAKOTA RIDGE SUBDIVISION BY MAX BOESIGER INC.: Corrie: Council, you have the findings of fact and conclusions of law for the variance request, questions or discussion? Hearing none I will entertain a motion on the findings of fact and conclusions. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, 1 move that City Council approve these findings of fact and conclusions. d • Meridian City Council August 19, 1997 Page 15 Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion is made and seconded to approve these findings of fact and conclusions of law, roll cal vote. ROLL CAL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Bentley -Absent, Rountree -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Morrow: Mr. Mayor, it is hereby decided that the variance from the R-4 street frontage of 80 feet and the required maximum block length of 1000 lineal feet are hereby granted. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the decision, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE FOR BENITON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY: Corrie: Council, you have those findings of fact before you. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I have a question for the City Attorney, I have two sets of findings, is there a difference between the two, I couldn't find one at first glance. Crookston: Not to my knowledge. Rountree: (Inaudible) in another item tonight I think it was just a doubling copying from my review of the two, but I would hope in the future that we can avoid having to do that. Crookston: I don't know anything about the copying but the original should be as I wrote it. Corrie: I went through both of them, they are exactly the same. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I would move that we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law that are attached to the Meridian City Council meeting form, identified at item #7. Morrow: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree, second by Mr. Morrow, any further discussion? Roll call vote. • ~~~~~vED AUG 1 8 1497 QIT'Y QF MERIDIAN SUSAN S. EASTLAKE, President GARY E. RICHARDSON, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary August 4, 1997 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 Re: MV-04-97 Dakota Subdivision The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) staff has received and reviewed the application and site plan for the item referenced above. This item will not be heard by the ACHD Commission unless the site plan is changed in such a manner as to require Commission review. All future design plans and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived in writing by the District. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 345-7662. Sincerely, Steve Arnold Senior Development Analyst cc: Project file Chron file /f~`~ ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714-6499 • Phone (208) 345-7630 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Auoust 19,1997 APPLICANT: MAX BOESIGER ITEM NUMBER: 6 REQUEST: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARWNCE REQUEST FOR DAKOTA RIDGE SUBDMSION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: ~~~ ~~ ~~. f1/ ~~~~ VV t ~I~ ,{~~ ~y/ UY OTHER: COMMENTS All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • . BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF .THE CITY OF MERIDIAN STREET FRONTAGE WIDTH APPLICATION OF MAX A. BOESIGER, INC. FOR A VARIANCE OF THE 80' STREET FRONTAGE ON THREE LOTS AND A VARIANCE OF THE 1,000' BLOCK LENGTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The above entitled variance request .having come on for hearing on August 5, 1997, at approximately 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at .the Meridian City Sall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, Becky Bowcutt of Briggs Engineering appearing for the Applicant, and the City Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony, the City Council of the City of Meridian makes the following: FINDINaB OF FACT 1. That notice of the public hearing on the variance was published for two consecutive weeks prior to the scheduled hearing for August 5, 1997, the first publication of which was fifteen (15 days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the August 5, 1997, hearing; that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That notice of public hearing is required to be sent to property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the land being considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E. , 11-2-419 D. , and 11- 9-612 B. l.b of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that his requirement has been met. 3. That the property is zoned R-4 Residential; that the FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 1 . • Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-410 A, requires that the street frontage in the R-4 zone for single-family subdivisions be 80 feet. 4. That the Applicant has requested that he be granted a variance from the minimum street frontage requirement for R-4 zoned lots for Lot 19, Block 3, and Lots 4 and 5, Block 4 of the subdivision. 5. The Applicant proposes to have a 50' street frontage on Lot 9 of Block 3, and proposes a shared drive-way concept for Lots 4 and 5 of Block 6 because of sewer easements. 6. The Applicant also proposes to obtain a variance from the maximum block length of 1,000 feet for Block 4, and argues that it is justified because the configuration of the school site creates a long block. The Applicant states that it has provided a micro- path (Lot 10, Block 4 j as a pedestrian connection for Block 4. The pathway would connect the elementary school with the subdivision. He further states that by providing the micro-path a pedestrian connection has been provided, which serves the same purpose for pedestrians as having a block of not more than 1,000 feet. 7. Becky Bowcutt, representing the Applicant, testified that the Applicant desires an exception to the 80 feet of lot frontage required in the R-4 zone and requests an easement to two of the lots. She indicated that there would be gates or ballads for the easement rather than 80 feet of street frontage. She also indicated that one of the block lengths in the subdivision was greater than 1,000 feet, but stated with the access of the school, by means of pedestrian accesses, the block is broken up. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 2 • • 8. That the Applicant is the owner of record of the property. 9. Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to the City Engineer, commented that due to the fact that the City Council has already approved the Preliminary Plat for the subdivision, the variance issue is really a mood point. He additionally states that the variance appears to be justified due to the sewer alignment and proposed school site plan shown. 10. The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District commented that a land use change/site development application is required for review prior to final platting, and stated that all laterals and waste way must be protected, all municipal surface drainage must be retained on -site, if any surface drainage leaves the site the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review the drainage plans, the Applicant must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805, and that it is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. 11. The Central District Health Department submitted a response and it did not indicate any objection to the variance. 12. The Meridian Fire Department and the Meridian Police Department submitted comments and they did not object to the variances. 13. That no people appeared at the hearing objecting to the variance .application. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 3 • CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice of the proposed subdivision to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of .the Applicant's property. 2. That the City has authority to grant variances pursuant to Section 11-2-419 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to Section 11-9-612 of the Development Ordinances. 3. That the City Council has judged this application by the guidelines, standards, criteria, and policies contained in the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and upon the record submitted to it and the things upon which it may take judicial notice. 4. That the Council may take judicial notice of its own proceedings, those of the Planning and Zoning Commission, governmental statutes, ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the. City and the State. 5. That the following provision of Section 11-2-419 A, of the Zoning Ordinance, is noted which is pertinent to the Application: 11-2-419 A. The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance from the terms of this Ordinance or from the Subdivision and Development Ordinances as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. No non-conforming use of neighboring lands, structures or buildings in the same district and no permitted or non-conforming use of lands, structures or buildings in other districts shall FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 4 ~J C~ be considered grounds for issuance of a variance. Variances shall be granted only where strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary. hardship. A variance application does not go to the Commission unless directed by the Council. 6. That the specific requirements regarding a variance that must be evidenced and found by the City Council are as follows: 11-2-419 C. FINDINGS A variance shall not be granted unless (as a result of a public hearing) the Council makes a statement of supportive reasons based directly on the evidence presented to it which supports conclusions that the mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have been met by the applicant and unless all of the following exist: 1. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; 2. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in~ extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self- inflicted, or that these conditions will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Ordinance; 3. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated; 4. That such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 7. That there would be a specific benefit or profit, economic gain or convenience to the Applicant, if the Application is granted, in that the Applicant would not have to meet the FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 5 • ordinance requirements that other developers have to meet, particularly in near and adjacent areas, including the required maximum lot frontage of 80 feet and the maximum block length of 1,000 feet. 8. That regarding Section 11-2-419 C it is specifically concluded as follows: a. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property .such that the strict application of the provisions of the street frontage and maximum block length Ordinances would clearly be unreasonable, in that the lots have restricted ability to meet the street frontage requirement due to reasons beyond the Applicant's control. The variance of the 1,000 foot maximum block length is caused by the placement of the school but Applicant has provided pedestrian access that breaks up the length of the block for pedestrian purposes. The requested deviations from the Ordinance are not substantial. b. That strict compliance with the requirements of the maximum 1,000 foot block length requirement would result in extraordinary hardship to~the applicant, because of the school which shall be constructed adjacent to Applicant's .property and because Applicant placed pedestrian accesses into and out of the school property, the granting of the variance would be reasonable and prudent. The granting of the variance on the 80 feet of street frontage would also be reasonable because sewer easements, not placed by the Applicant, cause the lack of ability to meet the 80 foot. requirement. c. That the granting of the specified variances would not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated. d. That such variance would not have the effect of altering the interests and purposes of the 80 foot street frontage requirement or the 1,000 foot block length of the Zoning Ordinance. 9. That in regard to the first paragraph of 11-2-419 A, FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 6 which is quoted above, it is specifically noted that it states, in part, as follows: The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance from the terms of this Ordinance or from the Subdivision and Development Ordinances as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. 10. That it is specifically concluded that the Application for the variances should be granted: a. In the case of the required street frontage, the street frontage on the lots for which the variance is requested was not established by the Applicant, but only established because the lots are large and they abut up against a sewer line easement. b. Because the block length in excess of 1,000 feet will be, or has been, provided with pedestrian accesses so that pedestrians may pass through the longer than 1,000 foot block to gain access to the school grounds. 11. The City has in the past granted similar variances as requested by the Applicant but has also denied such variances; each application must stand on its own merits and the granting of one variance is not a precedent for granting others. APPROVAL OF FINDINQ~S OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby approve these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN MORROW COUNCILMAN BENTLBY VOTED VOTE FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 7 • • COUNCILMAN ROUNTRBB VOTED COUNCILMAN TOLSMA VOTED MAYOR CORRIE (TIB BRBAKBR) VOTED DECISION That it is hereby decided that the variance from the R-4 street frontage of 80 feet and the required maximum block length of 1, 0 0 0 .s~aa~ee feet are hereby granted . APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: city\variance\dakota.ff FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 8 Meridian City Council • August 5, 1997 Page 8 Crookston: I have Morrow. And your recommendation is to approve it? Crookston: That is correct. Morrow: Okay, if there are no further questions Mr. Mayor f am prepared to move that we approve and adopt the development agreement. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma to approve the development agreement, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #9: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR DAKOTA RIDGE SUBDIVISION BY MAX BOESIGER INC.: Corrie: Is Mr. Boesiger or a representative here? At this time I will open the public hearing. Becky Bowcutt, 1111 S. Orchard, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Bowcutt: This is a request for a variance on the Dakota Ridge Subdivision, it was discussed and heard as a preliminary plat during the last City Council meeting. We are requesting a variance of the 80 foot lot frontage on three lots. This lot 18 here, Lot 18 Block 3, Lot 4 and 5 of Block 6. For the members that were not present 1 think Councilman Bentley was absent, we have this micropath coming in at an angle in order to give this particular lot the adequate frontage requirement. Staff recommended that we straighten this lot out, we have also got a sewer thank line that is existing that runs down through this property that goes into the Lake at Cherry Lane. Staffs comment was the thought that it would be a good compromise in order to keep this pathway straight. Secondly the fact that this lot is 16,271.8 square feet so it far exceeds the 8,000 square feet. These two lots the sewer line comes through here, we have to keep a separate lot for that trunk line. It is a 15 inch concrete sewer main. Therefore keeping that in a separate lots prohibits us from trying to get any frontage out onto the public right of way. Ada County Highway District did review this concept of a shared driveway, they consented to it based on the fact that we would have this as a separate lot under the ownership of the association and a perpetual ingress/egress easement to run with the land would be forever granted to these two lots so they could never be denied access tot their property. Our intent is to pave, it is 30 feet wide we would pave it and then we would put curb and gutter. to keep our drainage coming back into the street so it doesn't sluff to the lots or to the south to the Lake at Cherry Lane. One of the questions from Meridian City Council • August 5, 1997 Page 9 one of the residents who lives in the Lake at Cherry Lane was they did not want to promote vehicular access because they too have a similar lot right here. The solution that we have for that is either one we gate it and put some type of city approved lock on the gate or two we use like a ballard system so people could go through there with a bicycle or walk through that area but no vehicular traffic would go down into the lake at Cherry Lane. The other variance we are requesting is we have this one particular block right here that staff basically counts all of this as the block length. Obviously it does exceed 1,000 feet. In staff s review they stated that a micro path was placed here for the future elementary site that does break that block up. In your ordinance it talks about long blocks and the utilization of micro paths to provide pedestrian access in a long block. So we have done that here, but we do technically need a variance to the staff. Those are the issues that we are asking you to act on this evening. Do you have any questions? Rountree: Just for the record Becky would you state that the frontage on those two lots for the variance really meets the City requirements I terms of the lot sizes it is just a matter of it is a private access as opposed to a public access. Bowcutt: That is correct, lot 4 is 9,270.6 square feet, Lot 5 is 9,554.4 We have 80 feet of frontage and 84 feet of frontage. Corrie: Is there anyone from the public who would like to issue testimony on this item? Hearing none I will close the public hearing, Council discussion? Morrow. There being no discussion I wrould move that instruct the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law. Rountree: Second Come: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to have the Attomey prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Morrow. Mr. Morrow, on item #8 with respect to the development agreement my motion erred in not incorporating into it language to authorize the Mayor to sign and the clerk to attest that development agreement. Cowie: I will entertain a motion, with the Council's permission we wilt go back to that particular item and we will entertain a motion to that effect Mr. Morrow. Morrow. With no objection I will withdraw the motion and Mr. Tolsma you with draw your second? Tolsma: I withdraw the second. Meridian City Council . August 5, 1997 Page 10 Morrow. I would like to restate the motion for item 8 to approve the development agreement as reviewed by the City Attorney and authorize the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Tolsma: Second Morrow: Motion made by Mr. Morrow second by Mr. Tolsma to approve the development agreement with the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #10: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR BENITON CONSTRUCTION CO.: Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite the representative to speak with the construction company first. Doug Nichols, 594 Sturman Way, Eagle, was sworn by the City Attorney. Nichols: I am sure you all have a copy of staffs report. Basically what we are looking for is to temporarily occupy this building. Our lease agreement is a month to month basis. We basically agree with everything on staffs recommendations. Idid have one comment on the parking path and the asphalt drive into the building. I think you are all aware that Ada County is planning a major intersection improvement this fall. They will be taking most of the front yard and side yard out. We would just like to hold off and see what Ada County does to that. Also it is probably going to be moved anyway. That was the only question we had. Corrie: Questions of the Council? Rountree: Mr. Mayor, you indicated it was a temporary usage that you may be out by fall or you may be in for 2 to 3 or 4 years? Nichols: It is a month to month lease. The owner has not indicated any plans in the future for that site but that could change on a month to month basis. We don't have any objection to doing any of the site improvements. We would just basically like to wait until Ada County is done.. We will pave the driveway at that time and put in a parking lot. Corrie: Thank you, is there anyone ,from the audience that would like to enter testimony on this variance? Hearing none I will close the public hearing. Morrow. I would like to ask Gary his comments with respect to this project, how the rebuilt of Franklin and East First affects this property and given the fact that it is owned MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 5,1997 APPLICANT: Max Bcesiaer ITEM NUMBER: 9 REQUEST; Request for a variance for Dakota Ridge Subdivision AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ,~ y" r~ ~. -~ ~J~' ~. l~~ ~~ ~>~ ~I SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. OFFICIALS '~ LlAlyl G. BERG, JR., City Clerk rJANIC_ L SMITH, City Treasurer GAF~Y D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" CORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMITH TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: Julv 29, 1997 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 7/10/97 HEARING DATE: 8/5 /97 REQUEST: Variance for Dakota Ridae Subdivision BY: Max BoesiQer Inc. LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: S. of Ustick and 1/2 mile West on Ten Mile Road JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z RON MANNING, P2 MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT BYRON SMITH, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION KEITH BORUP, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT -CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C -GLENN BENTLEY, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PR LIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF REC I (PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES -BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMAR CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER ~~~~~~~ J U L 1 4 1997 (;~`i(OF ~tER1T~A~ OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk 'JANICE L. SMITH, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAI4T 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor O N I M MB RG WALT VV. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & •OMMI ION JIM JOHNSON. Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMITH TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: Julv 29, 1997 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 7/10/97 HEARING DATE: 8/5 /97 REQUEST: Variance for Dakota Ridge Subdivision BY: Max Boesiger Inc. LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: S. of Ustick and 1/2 mile West on Ten Mile Road JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z RON MANNING, P2 MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT BYRON SMITH, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION KEITH BORUP, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~ OTHER: ~~- ~~' 9 FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: -POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER ',g,~ ~'2,~ .¢ o ~ c CITY PLANNER _~~ ~ ~ w, ~ r `, CITY ~F ~-E~Ib1Aly Q CENTRAL CEI~AL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPA~IIENT •• DISTRICT Environmenul lieelth Division HEALTH ~'~~'~~~~~ R o Boise DEPARTMENT ! U~ 1 7 997 ^ Eagle Rezone # a'1'Vnr . ~~.,. ^ Garden city Meridian Conditional Use # ^ Kuna Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ^ ACZ X72/ G~ f-DDZ ~ ©Ti4 e~/G~° E ~!/~ /~S/O/`) I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ S. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ b. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ' ^ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ^ central vrater ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, ~ Division of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ communiity sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ^ central water ^ 10. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ I I. Stormwater disposal systems shall be reviewed by relative to: ^ Waste Disposal ^ Injection Well rules. ^ Groundwater Protection ^ 12. ^ 13. ^ 14. ^ 15. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ^ child care cancer Date: ? /'~ 1~_ Reviewed By:.^ Review Sheet mxo ions ~ ~. ins • ~EcE~vEp .~~tl Z ~ ~QO~ 'ITY qF 1VIERIDIA~ 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 16,Iuly 1997 T~Uil1 Berg, City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Median, ID 83642 RE.• Tr~anc~ f~ Daka+a Ridgy Subdivisloa -Max B Ins Dear Commissioners• OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 The Nampa ~ Meridian Irrigation District r~uires that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting, Contact Donna Moore at 343-1884 or 466-7861 for further information, All laterals and wasteways m ust be protected. All m unicipal surface drainage m ust be retained on site, Ifanysurface drarna~ leans the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District m ust review drainage plans The developer m ust comply with Idaho Code 31-3805, It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within the Nampa c~ Meridian Irrigation District, Sincerely, BiJ1 Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA ~ MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT BH.~dln cc: File -Shop File -Office Water Superintendent APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 • • ~~~~~~a 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 Stan McHutchison Briggs Engineering, Inc. 1111 South Orchard, Suite 600 Boise, ID 83705 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 RE: Land Use Change Application for Dakota Ridge Sub. Dear Stan: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the ak~ove- referenced development. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call on me at the District's office or John Anderson, the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop. Sincerely, Donna N. Moore, Assistant Secretary/Treasurer dnm cc: File Water Superintendent Leonard & Nadine Aschenbrenner Max A. Boesiger, Inc. City of Meridian enc. ry.~.. r; ~~~~ 4{{{,,, t~~C D ~~~4 ~ ` f v ..i' APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 18 July 1997 ~ • OFFICIALS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President JANICE L. SMITH, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EE ~ BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. GLENN R. BENTLEY JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHU DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W BOWERS Fire Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman . , W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 MALCOLM MACCOY WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 KEITH BORUP RON MANNING ROBERT D. CORRIE BYRON SMITH Mayor TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Shari Stiles, P&Z Administrator ~~ DATE: August 1, 1997 SUBJECT: Request for Variance of 80' Frontage on Lots 19, Block 3, and Lots 4 & 5, Block 6; and Variance of Maximum Block Length of 1,000 feet for Block 4 of Dakota Ridge Subdivision by Max A. Boesiger, Inc. Due to the fact that Council has already approved the preliminary plat, the variance issue is really a moot point. The variance appears to be justified due to the sewer alignment and proposed school site plan shown.