Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990 02-20ITEM: AGENDA MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 20, 1990 MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 6, 1990: (APPROVED) 1: PUBLIC HEARING: FINAL PLAT OF CRESTWOOD # 5: (APPROVED) 2: COVENANTS ON CHATEAU MEADOWS EAST # 1: (APPROVED) 3: DON HUBBLE, HUBBLE ENGINEERING, DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED PROJECT: (APPROVED) 4: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 20, 1990 The Regular -Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Grant Kingsford at 7:30 P.M.: Members Present: Ron Tolsma, Bob Giesler, Bert Myers, Max Yerrington: Others Present: Rob Prindle, Leon Blazer, Bruce.Stuart, Don Hubble, Wendy Stead, Bob Biller, K. Beumeler, Jim Johnson, Moe Alidjani, Jack Smith, Wayne Crookston, Wayne Skiver, Earl Ward, Gary Smith, Bill Gordon, Twayne Walker': The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Giesler to approve of the Minutes of the previous meeting of February 6, 1990 as written: Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #l: PUBLIC HEARING: FINAL PLAT OF CRESTWOOD #5: Kingsford: I will now open the Public Hearing, is there anyone who wishes to testify, if so please come forward and be sworn. Also I would like to acknowledge a letter received from Thomas A. Nelson in opposition to T & R's request. Wendy Stead, 1355 W. Crestwood, was sworn by the attorney. Stead: I am the Vice President of the Homeowners Association. I am voiceing my concerns about the things that were supposed to be done before but weren't, such as street lights, R.V. parking, etc. Kingsford: Is there anyone else who wishes to testify, being no response:the Public Hearing was closed. I'd like to ask, do you have plans for exactly where Tennis Courts & R.V. Parking would be and when and so forth. Rob Prindle: It's designated in the preliminary plat where it's going to be which is in phase 6. Kingsford: That being a different phase, certainly with regard to time we -- Stead: As long as I've got something I can take back to tell them. Kingsford: Having that in a preliminary plat we can hold the developer to that in the next phase. Stead: If another developer were to come in there and decide they wanted to do something else/does that mean that phase 6 or the next plat would no longer be? Kingsford: They could alter and go with something different, there would be a Public Hearing. Giesler: I have one comment concerning the covenants, I would just like to remind you that the City does not enfore covenants. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Yerrington to approve the final Plat of Crestwood #5. Motion Carried: All Yea: MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 20, 1990 PAGE #2 ITEM #2c_ COVENANTS ON CHATEAU MEADOWS EAST#1: Kingsford: You have had those covenants, do you have any questions? Giesler: Number 8 about the businesses, I need that explained to me about the business being conducted on - Page #4 item #8. Crookston: It says that Business shall not be conducted on the above property unless legally permitted under the existing and prevailing zoning restrictions, that just puts it back on the zoning, and then if permitted which would I assume would mean if the zoning permits it no business shall be allowed that cannot be conducted within the residence of; the owner, I take it that means it couldn't be conducted outside or in a shop adjacent to the building or something like that, it would have to be in the actual home of the owner. Blazer: What it specifically addresses are things like day cares, or those types of things that people have within there house after they obtain a City License. The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Myers to approve of the Covenants on Chateau Meadows East #1 with the counselors corrections. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #3: DON HUBBLE, HUBBLE ENGINEERING, DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED PROJECT: Don Hubble, with Hubble Engineering, 3952 Daisy Way, we are coming before you tonight to ask for your approval on a proposed project. The situation for this property is that it's about half within the City's area of impact and about half outside so right now it has a dual zoning designation. What we would like to do is take a letter of approval back to the County Planning & Zoning, if you approve, and see if they will approve this preliminary plat and act on it. Right now they won't because of this dual zoning. This parcel is about 332 acres which according to the new County Zoning Ordinance would make it eligible to be split into 7 lots, 7 building lots, there is an existing home on Lot 7 which would be sold off separatly, then the other lots would be designated as building lots, and then the lots that are left would be designated as non building lots, reserved for agricultural purposes. What we'd like if you approve of this is a similar letter to the one written for Jasmine Acres. There was discussion about the existing house and lane. Myers: What's the reason for doing it like this, why not 33 one acre lots. Hubble: The new County Zoning Ordinance won't allow that, their density limit is one lot per five acres in their RT Zone. Myers: Okay, but if we amend ours then we could allow one acre per lot, right? Kingsford: We could allow a denser population than that, but you'd be going through a five acre subdivision to get to the back of this where there could be four dwelling units per acre. Crookston: In our Comprehensive Plan it has a agricultural designation that is five acres, one dwelling unit per five acres. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 20, 1990 PAGE #3 We don't have anything in our Zoning Ordinance that deals with that. Is this something that divided into these size parcels that could subsequently be re- it would be re -subdivided into let's say two or three dwelling units per acre. Hubble: According to the County Zoning Ordinance the area that she cross -hatched has to be maintained as agricultural land, it cannot be re -subdivided. Kingsford: Is it reasonable to re -subdivide this and have additional building lots down the road. Is it layed out in such a fashion that that is prudent. Hubble: Part of that could be re -subdivided but it's not going to be easy. Each buyer will buy two lots, one for a home site and one that's designated for agricultural preservation. This will have restrictive covenants attached to it at the time it is final platted. There was further discussion about the map. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to write a letter to the County stating that we do not object to this project. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #4: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: Kinford: I wanted to compliment Gary on his participation I think that his attendance at lfs HIghway Districts Meetings has been very useful to us. We appreciate your efforts. The Motion was made by Myers and seconded by Tolsma to adjourn at 8:03 P.M.: (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: � \ Grant P. Kingsford, Mayor ATTEST: P & Z Members, Atty, Eng., Bldg., Fire, Police, Ward Stuart, ACHD, NMID, ACC, Valley News, Statesman, CDH, Hallett, Settlers Mail (3) File (3)