HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995 06-06MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
F.ITCTZF,l
TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 1995 - 7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD MAY 16,1995:
(APPROVED)
TABLED MAY 16,1995: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO
THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT BY DAVID AND DENISE HALL: (CITY
ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDNIGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW)
2. TABLED MAY 16,1995: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR A TWO YEAR TIME
EXTENSION ON RECORDING FINAL PLAT FOR GOLF VIEW ESTATES
NO.4 & 5 BY GOLF VIEW ESTATES PARTNERSHIP: (CITY ATTORNEY
TO PREPARE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW)
6. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE SETBACK
REQUIREMENT BY RICHARD HEATON: (CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW)
7. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO TILE THE EIGHT MILE
111 •' vilLol Wilum • SIZ6,101 2 WIA,
8. REQUEST FOR WATER HOOK-UP BY TOM MYALL: (APPROVED)
9. CC&R'S FOR ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2: (APPROVED)
10. CC&R'S FOR LAYNE INDUSTRIAL PARK: (APPROVED)
11. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TURTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION: (APPROVED
ONE YEAR EXTENSION)
12. WATER/SEWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES: (APPROVED)
14. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. GARY SMITH, CITY ENGINEER
1. WELL NO. 16 - DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND
RESTRICTIONS AND GRANT OF EASEMENT: (APPROVED)
2. STOREY PARK - PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION FEES:
(CITY ATTORNEY TO RESEARCH)
3. BID OPENING RESULTS - SEWER LINE CLEANING & VIDEO:
(MSCI FOR $14,564.30)
4. LETTER OF CONSENT FOR VACATION OF HEADWAY CT.:
(APPROVED)
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 6. 1995
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Grant P.
Kingsford at 7:30 P.M.:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Walt Morrow, Max Yerrington, Bob Corrie, Ron Tolsma:
OTHERS PRESENT: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, David Hall,
Richard Heaton, Wayne Forrey, Malcolm MacCoy, Robert Strasser, Mike Caven, Tom
Myall, Ery Olen:
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD MAY 16,1995:
Kingsford: Are there any corrections to those minutes?
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor I move for their approval.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve the minutes for May 16, 1995 all
those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #1: TABLED MAY 16,1995: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO
THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT BY DAVID AND DENISE HALL:
Kingsford: Does Council, are they here this evening? Counselor, should I re -open the
public hearing?
Crookston: Yes
Kingsford: At this time I will re -open the public hearing and invite Mr. Hall to speak first.
David Hall, 2582 North Caribou, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Hall: I am here because my house was built in violation of the city's setback requirement.
I guess I am before you tonight to make sure I don't have to suffer any consequences
down the road because of errors made by my builder and developer.
Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Hall?
Morrow. I have a couple, was this house built, you bought the house it was already built?
Hall: Yes
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 2
Morrow: So this was not a build job, you didn't have anything to do with the build job?
Hall: No
Morrow: And the second question is how was this discovered how was this mistake
discovered?
Hall: Originally I could not locate the property pin on one of the corners and talked to the
developer and the builder and they couldn't find it either. Finally when I got them together
they admitted that the house was built based upon probably a line marker embedded in
the sidewalk which was in error 3 feet away from the pin. The pin was about a foot deep
and at that time it was in February or March two years ago. They couldn't find it and built
the home based on the PL marker that was in error.
Morrow: The PL mark on the sidewalk itself?
Hall: Yes
Morrow: Who is the builder and developer?
Hall: The builder is Wildwood Homes, the developer was Properties West.
Morrow: And have they helped you at all in terms of resolving this issue?
Hall: They got the engineers to verify that the stakes were correct and that the developer
made an error in marking the sidewalk and the builder made an error in relying on that
mark instead of the pin. I originally requested for a property line adjustment and they
talked me into applying for a variance of course which is cheaper. Apparently they are
paying any fees associated with this request.
Morrow: So you have no out of pocket expense to yourself and your wife?
Hall: No
Crookston: How close is the, in the adjacent property, as a home, is there a home on the
next lot?
Hall: Yes there is.
Crookston: How close is that to your home?
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 3
Hall: I would say their garage and my garage are 8 feet apart maybe a little more maybe
10 feet. The house beside me is in accordance to your setback requirement.
Kingsford: And it was built on the basis of the actual pin then rather than the property line
marker?
Hall: Yes
Kingsford: Any other questions for Mr. Hall? I certainly appreciate your bringing this to
our attention. Is there anyone else from the public that would like to make comment on this
issue? Seeing none I will close the public hearing, Council members?
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, did Daunt have any comments. The last time we had this Will made a
comment that Daunt didn't get his comments into us. Is there anything, there is nothing on
this one.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor I would move that we instruct the City Attorney to prepare findings of
fact and conclusions of law for the variance request.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to have the City Attorney prepare findings of
fact and conclusions of law, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: What that means Mr. Hall is we will have those as required by law at our next
meeting. If they are approved and the Council will make a decision based on those.
ITEM #2: TABLED MAY 16,1995: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR A TWO YEAR
TIME EXTENSION ON RECORDING FINAL PLAT FOR GOLF VIEW ESTATES NO. 4 &
5 BY GOLF VIEW ESTATES PARTNERSHIP:
Kingsford: Councilmen, do you have further questions or comments about that?
Morrow. I guess my only question was is can we do 2 years, historically we have done one
year at a time, can we do two?
Kingsford: The past the year is one issue, but I think our ordinance calls out one year
does it not Counselor?
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 4
Crookston: The one year requirement to complete the platting and recording is one year,
I don't believe that we have a requirement as to how long an extension can be made.
Kingsford: What we are being asked to do though is to make an extension longer than
what our ordinance calls for initially, twice as long is that not correct?
Crookston: Yes it is.
Tolsma: (Inaudible)
Kingsford: Also at issue is I think the Council needs to be considering is the issue on tiling
of the ditch. I think there have been several occasions that Eight Mile Lateral has been
variance from tiling. I think that they need to apply certainly for that.
Corrie: Mr. Mayor I believe they should because in this case a variance would have to be
also applied with Mr. Turnbull too on the other side. So we need to act on that too
(inaudible).
Kingsford: Any other comments? Is the Council prepared to take action?
Tolsma: (Inaudible)
Kingsford: Well I think you condition it upon that application.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor I move that we grant
Crookston: We need findings.
Kingsford: It is a variance request.
Morrow. I am sorry, I move that we grant the approval for the City Attorney to prepare the
findings of fact and conclusions, you didn't let me finish.
Kingsford: I could clearly see that is where you were headed.
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to have the City Attorney prepare findings of
fact and conclusions of law on the request for an extension to the recording of Golf View
Estates No. 4 and 5, all those in favor? Opposed?
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 5
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #3: ORDINANCE #705 - ANNEXATION - D.W. INC.:
(Inaudible)
Kingsford: What we require is any time we do a land use change which is either zoning
or grant a variance or a conditional use. We have findings of fact and conclusions of law
that warrant that. Those findings will be prepared for us at the next meeting and the
Council will act on that basis. What you do need to do however is as was stipulated in the
motion is to get the paperwork and start a variance to the tiling of that ditch. Is that clear?
Ordinance #705 annexing D.W. Inc. property, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS
DESCRIBED AS A PART OF S 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 AND A PART OF
THE NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 5, T.3N, R.1 E, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY,
IDAHO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public
that would like to have Ordinance #705 read in its entirety? Seeing none I would entertain
a motion on Ordinance #705.
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I move we approve Ordinance #705 with suspension of the rules.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve Ordinance #705 with suspension of
the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea, Tolsma - Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND
ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND
LYING IN A PORTION OF THE E 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND THE W 1/2
OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.3N, R. 1W, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA
COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from
the public that would like to have Amended Ordinance #699 read in its entirety? Seeing
none I would entertain a motion on Amended Ordinance on #699.
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve of the amended ordinance #699 with
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 6
the suspension of the rules.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to amended ordinance #699 with suspension
of the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Corrie - Yea, Tolsma - Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #5: FINAL PLAT: STRASSER FARMS SUBDIVISIONNO. 2 BY ROBERT
Kingsford: Does the Council have any questions on that?
Morrow: I had some questions on Bruce's comments in terms of, this plat is apparently
outside the city limits, it is in the County. My question is and they are requesting a
subdivision and they are requesting water is that correct. Bruce's comments indicate that
a request for municipal services outside the City limits of the City of Meridian must be
approved by the City Council. Assessment fees for sewer and water service would be
double the current rate charged a single user within the City limits.
Kingsford: Mr. Strasser is that correct? Are you asking for city utilities?
Strasser: (Inaudible)
Kingsford: You are aware and I think were made aware at that time were you not that being
outside the City the hook up fees are double, the user fees are the same as everyone else
but the hook up fees are double?
Strasser: Yes, currently one of the lots has already been hooked up to the sewer. The
other lots have been provided with city water and city sewer to the lots but nothing and we
are not really going to be using anything different than we are currently using at this time.
Kingsford: But you are aware that as those lots are built on when the permit fit, when the
permit is picked up you will have to pay a double fee for those?
Strasser: Yes
Morrow. I guess my last question would be is it not possible for this ground to be annexed,
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 7
it is not contiguous to the City?
Strasser: Nothing contiguous at this time.
Morrow. Okay and there is apparently a piece of property between Lansbury Subdivision
and where you guys are.
Strasser: There are 2 pieces.
Morrow: That are not within the City. Thank you.
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I have some questions, this is a request for a rezone of the property to
R4, right now you are just asking for 2 lots to be zoned R4.
Strasser: Yes
Corrie: Now you are going to later put 4 homes to the acre, how are you doing this?
Strasser: At this time we are not going to make any changes to the land in any way shape
or form. The purpose for the rezone and the split was to satisfy the bank so we can sell
the property. They won't loan on an 8 acre piece so they will only loan on 5 acres or less.
So we broke off one acre in order to be able to satisfy that for the buyer. He is going to
make no changes in the existing land or anything else. We left it that way so that in the
event somebody does want to make a change they have to come back through this action
and through this course so that you people have a chance to review anything that is done
at that time.
Corrie: Okay, so the status quo is staying the same as it is, there is not going to be 28
homes in there without our approval down the line. This is a concern that some of the
people out there had at this point.
Strasser: Right nothing is going to change.
Corrie: Thank you
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I have a question, how can the City of Meridian zone something
without annexing it?
Kingsford: It is a zoning change with Ada County. We have to approve that to Ada County
development services.
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 8
Corrie: Is that not a mis-nomen saying the final plat, they are really not platting, they are
plaiting 2 lots.
Kingsford: As I look at this now Mr. Strasser if it would be your desire you are contiguous.
You have some property then that separates it that is not included in this is that right?
Strasser: I didn't know that anything was in the City.
Kingsford: Take a look at this if you would, which property are you talking about here right
now, this piece. This is in the City, no that is right we provided them services. So is this
your property as well?
Strasser: (Inaudible)
Kingsford: Okay, so you are not contiguous then. Again what you are being asked to do
is to okay this through Ada County.
Morrow. So the City's only interest if I understand you correctly at this point in time is
should Mr. Strasser or the gentlemen buying the one piece in the corner to request sewer
and water hook up which is available, they will pay double fees. Other than that our only
assignment here tonight is to give our blessing to Ada County that this can occur and we
don't have a problem with it.
Strasser: If I might just for clarification on my part and JUB's item #4 about deleting the
domestic water service (inaudible) on this if we delete that from the final plat than we can't
get past the health services. We need that in order to be able to split it. So basically I am
asking also that you give us your okay and that you would sign off should someone in the
future build a home on either side that they could attach to the City sewer and water.
Which would be the proper thing to do anyway.
Kingsford: Gary, could you explain note 4 there?
Smith: By State statute I believe it is the code requires when in the city limits or within a
water sewer district that that note be attached to the plat. Basically what that notes says
on the plat and I will read it to you,"all lots on this plat are eligible to receive domestic
water service in the City of Meridian, Idaho, municipal water system. Further the City of
Meridian, Idaho has agreed in writing to serve all lots within this plat with domestic water."
The reason that note was written the way it was is because that approval is a special
approval because they are outside the city limits, special approval by the City Council. I
don't know that approving the plat as such approves it for connection to the city system
because it is outside the city limits. I guess if the Council wants to approve that connection
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 9
for service at this point that it could be left on the plat.
Kingsford: That is your desire?
Strasser: Yes, that way we can go on and go ahead with the next step and get it through
health services. Without city sewer they are going to tell us that we can't do this.
Kingsford: I think what you need to do then is actually to make application to the City to
hook to sewer and water and I think we can act on this this at this point but I think you are
going to have to ask for that approval.
Strasser: The one piece already has been.
Kingsford: I was thinking that I remembered that.
Strasser: We asked for that and we got and it is hooked up and inspected and approved
by the City.
Smith: That was the sewer on the smaller lot is that correct?
Strasser: Yes
Kingsford: What he is saying is everything on that plat by that note being on there said
it is hooked up. We would need to give approval to that to be on the plat.
Strasser: There is a 4 inch and a 2 inch water service to the other lot, the larger lot.
Smith: We provided the stubs just so that you didn't need to tear up the street to get that
put in, but we did that to all the properties along Meridian Road whether they were in the
City or in the County.
Strasser: Whatever it is you need is fine with me, I will do whatever is required to make
that happen.
Kingsford: I think there is just an application that you fill out with the City Clerk requesting
that.
Strasser: Are there fees that need to be paid at this time?
Kingsford: You pay those fees at the time of the building permit or actual connection.
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 10
Smith: Just a request letter is all we have been asking for from the property owner.
Crookston: Mr. Mayor, I would think that it would be appropriate to state on the plat that
they will have to pay double connection fees so that a person looking at the plat will know.
If the property is in fact not annexed by the city.
Kingsford: Do you want to give your speech Gary on not putting too much stuff on the plat?
Which I agree with that too.
Smith: There isn't a lot of information on this plat I guess the note could be added. It is not
going to encumber the plat to any great degree. It is an ordinance item but Wayne is right
if somebody looks at the plat they may not understand that there is a double assessment
fee. And on the sewer particularly that could have an impact.
Kingsford: If we did that I think it would mitigate the request for hooking to the city sewer
and water because that would be obvious on the plat. Let's do that and make it a
requirement a note on the plat. Is there a motion to that effect?
Morrow: I have a question, if we are going to make that a note on the plat do we also write
in that note until such time the property is annexed? Do you put some sort of sunset clause
on the double hook up fee issue? Because once it becomes part of the City and the
double hook up fee goes away is that correct?
Smith: That is correct.
Kingsford: It just needs to be worded in such a fashion as long as it is outside the City of
Meridian there be a double hook up fee. However you want to put that you send that along
to Development services and request that on the plat. That is probably better yet, approve
it conditioned upon that being on the plat.
Morrow: So basically what we are doing is we are making a motion to recommend
approval of the Strasser Farm Subdivision No. 2 to Ada County Development Services
subject to the plat containing the phrase that double hook up fees will be required until
such time the property becomes part of the City of Meridian or annexed to the City of
Meridian.
Kingsford: Well, in fact I can see an attorney dealing with that. If you leave it like they
have put it then what they are going to say is they want a refund when it gets annexed.
Morrow: Well, they have already paid the one, so it is just the second parcel that it is a
question.
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 11
Kingsford: This can't be as hard as we are making it.
Smith: Mr. Mayor can we just make the note refer to the Ordinance so the people know
that there is a requirement in the ordinance and we can refer to the specific section in the
ordinance as far as sewer and water assessment fees are concerned. That deal with inside
and/or outside the City limits.
Kingsford: Good job Gary, is there a motion?
Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we recommend to Ada County Development
Services the approval of the final plat of the Strasser Farms Subdivision No. 2 subject to
a note on the plat siting the water and sewer ordinance.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to recommend to Ada County Development
Services the final plat be approved for Strasser Farms Subdivision No. 2 subject to a note
on the plat referring to Meridian sewer and water ordinance on double hook up, all those
in favor? Opposed?
ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE SETBACK
REQUIREMENT BY RICHARD HEATON:
Kingsford: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite the owner or his designee
to speak first.
Rich Heaton, 456 West Woodbury, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Heaton: Okay, Councilmen I would like to introduce myself I am Richard Heaton and I
have lived in Meridian my whole life, graduated from Meridian High School. For the last
eight years I have worked for a home based dry wall company owned by Yogie McDonald.
My proposal is to build a 14 by 16 storage shed in the back of my property, 5 foot off my
back property line. Upon starting this, which I have already poured the pad as of about
the middle of September of last year. I had contacted all the utilities and the utilities
assured me the water and the gas all come into the front of the property. They said they
didn't care, the cable T.V. and telephone all came to the back of the property and they said
5 foot is all we needed. So with that information and going by, I had approved by the
subdivision they said they didn't meet with any disapproval. They said go ahead, I went
ahead and poured it. The purpose of the shed is just strictly to store stuff, I am sure you
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 12
guys have been in a lot of these smaller houses and you have seen the garages. They are
fairly crowded I like to build part of my trucks inside there. Personal hardships that it would
cause would be just strictly the financial and time I have into it so far. I would have to do
something about that pad that is already in there right now. As far as all my neighbors I
have contacted all of them and they have no problem with it, all my immediate neighbors
within about 3 or 4 houses. As far as, I would like to mention the comments, you guys all
have copies of the comments on that. I would like to address the one dealing with US
West. It said that US West telephone facility is 6 foot south of the rear property line. As
many times as I have had dig line out there which as near as I can tell it has been about
5 that line has never been located at 6 foot in it has always been 2 feet off my back
property line the fence line. I would like to also mention the comment there that the
Building Inspector made. The way I read it is it makes me look like I tried to get away with
something. The only reason why he knew about it is because I went in on my own to file
my own building permit and that is the only reason why anybody knew about it. I wasn't
trying to get away with anything at all. As far as my neighbors, I had one of them show
up, I am not sure if you guys would like to hear from him yet.
Kingsford: Well, it is a public hearing if he would like to talk we will certainly hear from him.
Heaton: that is pretty much all I had
Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Heaton? Hit me with the size of that building again would
you Richard?
Heaton: 14 by 16 and I have dropped the pitch to 2 - 4 - 12 to keep the height down
requested by the subdivision.
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, are there any covenants out there against having this type of building
at all?
Heaton: No sir, I have been meeting with Ramon Yorgason and he has letters from me
from 9-19 -94 and they have never been met with any disapproval.
Tolsma: You have seen Bruce Freckleton's comments, the Assistant City Engineer
(inaudible)?
Heaton: Yes sir.
Tolsma: He said if we did grant this there wouldn't (inaudible).
Heaton: I would be willing to, I am sure that US West has not been out there since they
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 13
have been notified of this variance. I have yet to see them and my backyard is really tight
right now as far as getting the gates (inaudible) sure they haven't been back there to mark
it. I have had, our dirt is especially hard back there and I have had to call in augurs to do
all my shrub stuff and the back hoe that dug that thing for me. I had it all marked up before
so I am well aware that it is not 6 foot in. We would have found it when I dug it, (inaudible).
Crookston: Mr. Heaton, are there any irrigation facilities?
Heaton: Yes sir, there is pressurized irrigation running to the back of the property all along
there but it is to the north of the fence. Which technically is not my property it is the
subdivision's it is the common area.
Crookston: What about Nampa Meridian, is there any irrigation fine?
Heaton: Do you have a plot plan, 1 have one here for you. (Inaudible)
Crookston: Your lot doesn't go into that easement at all?
Heaton: (Inaudible)
Crookston: I was just wondering whether or not
Heaton: The irrigation district requested or whatever they were talking about which
apparently I am not sure what they are talking about. They have plenty of room. All of
theirs is on the other side (inaudible) I presume has easement to it. There should be about
25 feet that is before you get to the non -flat working ground. Then you have the rest of the
bank, the creek bank, the south slough bank..
Corrie: I have one more question, you brought up about the remarks of the building
department, he stated also in that you were aware that a permit was needed to do this
before you poured this, did you know that?
Heaton: Yes, I was well aware that there was a permit needed.
Corrie: But you didn't get it?
Heaton: No sir, it was one of those things that I had access to a back hoe one weekend,
the guy came over and dug it, I had access to the concrete. I went ahead and poured I had
access, I knew the very good friends of Jim Nelson the owner to where we just went ahead
and did it real quick and then I went in the following weekend or week and told Daunt what
had happened and he said you have problems and that is where we are at.
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 14
Corrie: I understand that but you knew it before you did it.
Heaton: True
Corrie: And you went ahead and did it anyway. I was just following up, you brought it up
I just wanted to see where it was from there.
Heaton: Pretty much yes.
Kingsford: What is kind of interesting for the Council's information on that size of a
structure if you put it on a permanent foundation it requires a variance and all that stuff but
you can have a portable shed, you could put that thing on skids and put it right on the
property line.
Heaton: What would be the problem with building it and it has elbows around the
foundation on the bearing points, by rights wouldn't it be a portable shed if you unbolted
it and it could be possible to lift off and move.
Kingsford: By that definition so it everyone's house in here. With regard particularly to the
Council's concerns of US West and the irrigation district and so on you have to be aware
that if they need to get there you may have a building tom down. Of course you can never
borrow money on those sorts of things and so on. But I think at least my observation is you
are clearly out of their easement. Does the Council have anymore questions of Mr.
Heaton? We will take other public comment if there are others. Anyone else from the
public that would like to offer testimony on this issue?
Don Ensberg, 447 West Woodbury, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Ensberg: I have talked with Rich about this before. I have also talked with the surrounding
neighbors and they have no comments, derogatory comments against it. It does not
interfere with the site or scenery or anything of that nature. As far as I can see from our
neighbors and myself we have no objection to it.
Kingsford: Any questions for Don? Thank you sir, anyone else from the public? Seeing
none I will close the public hearing.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor I would move that we instruct the City Attorney to prepare findings of
fact and conclusions of law for the variance requested by Richard Heaton.
Corrie: Second
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 15
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to have the City Attorney prepare findings of
fact and conclusions of law for Richard Heaton, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Again, Richard we will have those at the next meeting and we will take action
then.
ITEM #7: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO TILE THE EIGHT MILE
LATERAL BY WILD SHAMROCK PARTNERSHIP:
Kingsford: At this time I will open the public hearing on that issue and invite the owner or
his designee to speak first.
Mike Caven, 6874 Fairview Avenue, was sworn by the City Attorney.
Caven: We are requesting a variance to tile the Eight Mile Lateral, this is following a
conditional use permit that was before this Council. I don't know if it was your last hearing
or the hearing before I believe and that was the City requested we apply for a variance.
We have read the comments by the City, we have no problems with the comments. So if
there are any questions?
Kingsford: Does the Council have any questions of Mr. Caven?
Morrow.. In their application it says the ditches are probably greater than a 48 inch
diameter, did you confirm that is either greater or lesser?
Caven: I have talked to the irrigation district and that is their note in here that this is
probably 48 without them going out and doing any studies. The city comments from the
City Engineer Bruce Freckleton I guess this lateral also goes through Parkside Creek
Subdivision and the engineer that was on that project indicated it was 72 inch diameter
would be required to tile the Eight Mile Lateral through that section. When I talked to the
City they said a minimum of 48 and they are probably saying that is not correct it is
probably higher.
Kingsford: Their comment sheet says larger than 48 inch from the irrigation district.
Tolsma: (Inaudible)
Morrow: I understand Ron it is the same one but everybody keeps coming with these
lateral things saying it is greater than 48 inches, at some point in time water is taken out
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 16
of the laterals and they become less than 48 inches. My concern here is, is it 48 inches?
It is 72 at Parkside Creek but how much water comes out before it gets to this part of
property.
Tolsma: This is before Parkside Creek.
Morrow. So we know then
Tolsma: This is just across the street from the speedway.
Morrow: At this point, so there is no other water that goes into it or out of it? We are
saying it is greater than 48 inches?
Kingsford: Well, sometimes Ron it rains, so it could be more water going in it. But the note
from Nampa Meridian is that it is larger than (inaudible) determined exactly. Your point is
well taken, water is in and water is out. Any other questions for Mike? Anyone else from
the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue? Seeing none I will close the
public hearing.
Corrie: Mr .Mayor, I move that we have the Attorney draw up the findings of fact and
conclusions of law for the variance to tile the Eight Mile Lateral.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact
and conclusions of law on the variance request for the Eight Mile Lateral by Wild
Shamrock Partnership, all those in favor? Opposed?
ITEM #8: REQUEST FOR A WATER HOOK UP BY TOM MYALL:
Kingsford: Do you want to make a presentation or does the Council have questions?
Morrow: You are aware of the necessary fees?
Myall: Yes
Morrow. That is the only issue I have. 1 have no objections.
Kingsford: Is there a motion?
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 17
Morrow. Mr. Mayor I would move that we approve the request by Mr. and Mrs. Tom Myall
for the water hook up to City water at the location of 1470 North Locust Grove Road.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve the request for a water hook up for
Mr. and Mrs. Tom Myall at 1470 West Locust Grove Road, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Smith: Mr. Mayor, I need a point of clarification, is this pre -approval is that based on the
assessment rate today. If Mr. and Mrs. Myall don't connect until some future time I just
need to be sure so on our assessment form.
Kingsford: Our policy has always been Gary that it is whatever the rate is at the time that
the connection is made. If this is down the road 2 years or 3 years or whatever our hook
fee is at that time. But you are approved to hook at that basis.
Smith: Thank you
Kingsford: If you want to pay for it today however you can buy at today's price.
Morrow. I think Mr. Mayor that is fairly standard within the industry within the valley. And
if they do secure todays rate.
Kingsford: That has always been our policy so you are clear on that then?
ITEM #9: CC&R'S FOR ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2:
Kingsford: Does the Council have any questions of the Attorney or Shari?
Morrow. My question is what is the status of Elk Run No. 2?
Kingsford: Can you update us Shari on Elk Run No. 2 or Will Berg?
Berg: I can, this is just the last of the little glitches that was in that project. We have the
current development agreement, we are approving the CC&R's. They have got the
bonding, letter of credit for the tiling of the ditch and street lights, and pressurized
irrigation.
Morrow. What has become of, refresh my memory, the issues with respect to No. 1 where
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 18
the conflict was they had been instructed to tile but had not tiled has that been resolved
also?
Berg: They will be tiling the whole thing, that will not be tiled until November.
Morrow: After the current irrigation season?
Berg: Correct, they have an agreement with Nampa Meridian to provide the the and they
will install it, Nampa Meridian will install it. So this is the last requirement that I guess was
overlooked.
Corrie: Has both the Attorney and you read them? Shari, you haven't?
Kingsford: The CC&R's, I am not sure that Shari always has anyway. Do you have any
question about those Counselor, they meet with your approval?
Crookston: They do now.
Kingsford: Adjustments have been made.
Crookston: Yes
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the CC&R's for Elk Run Subdivision No. 2.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Ron to approve the CC&R's No. 2, all those in favor?
Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #10: CC&R'S FOR LAYNE INDUSTRIAL PARK:
Kingsford: Have those also been reviewed Counselor?
Crookston: Yes they have.
Kingsford: And the appropriate changes have been made?
Crookston: Did you receive word on that?
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 19
Stiles: We did receive a new copy after Wayne and I reviewed it together and they
incorporated all of the changes we (End of Tape)
Kingsford: Is there a motion?
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor I make the motion that we approve the CC&R's for Layne Industrial
Park.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve the CC&R's for Layne Industrial
Park, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Crookston: Mr. Mayor can we go back to item number 9, there was something that came
through my office today that pertained to the CC&R's. I would like to if you change that
motion subject to my approval.
Yerrington: So moved
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to change the approve of the CC&R's on Elk
Run Subdivision No. 2 to subject to Counselor's approval of the latest correspondence
from them, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #11: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TURTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION:
Kingsford: Does the Council have a question on that request?
Morrow: Mr. Mayor I move that we grant the request for extension of one year for the
preliminary plat for Turtle Creek Subdivision.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to grant the extension of one year on the
preliminary plat for Turtle Creek Subdivision, all those in favor? Opposed?
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 20
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #12: ERV OLEN -ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION: DISCUSSION CONCERNING
STUDY OF IMPACT AT EAGLE ROAD AND 1-84:
Kingsford: Welcome to Meridian Mr. Olen.
Olen: Thank you very much Mr. Mayor and members of the Council. I am here tonight to
talk to you a bit about some work we are doing with Ada County Highway District to look
at the transportation impacts of the proposed power center mall, Eagle Road and 1-84 in
the southeast comer. We have determined that probably we need to look at what I call a
cumulative impact of that and do kind of a sub -area analysis so that we can look at the so
called spin off potential if that development were to go. Also recognize some
developments that have occurred here that frankly aren't in our current demographic
assumptions for that area most notably the St. Luke's complex under construction. So in
order to do that one of Ada Planning Associations roles in this would be to do the
demographic shifts that reflect both the proposed power center mall and also any related
development that would be expected to be used. What that means is since we use what
we call zero sum shifting when we add something somewhere in the county we like to take
it from somewhere else. Because of that kind of a process we are here tonight to first let
you know that we are working with the Highway District to do that and we would like some
feedback and direction from each of you on how you interpret your Comprehensive Plan
and maybe how we would work with your Planning and Zoning Commission and perhaps
the staff in doing those shifts. Typically what we do is we have a demographic advisory
committee that meets when we need to get together and look at major developments like
this and shifts. They are composed of representatives of all the cities, I know Mr. Forrey
represented the City of Meridian when we last did the update in 1993 and we would expect
someone representing the City would participate. Right now our assumptions for our
development in that area in terms of retail employment is very minimal frankly. A mall such
as being proposed would be something in the order of 1500 employees if it is anything as
the same ratio of the Boise Town Square mall, 1500 to 2000. So that is going to be a fairly
significant shift and in order to do that we don't want to do it in a vacuum we really would
like to get your feed back and thoughts and directions if you will. Then work with your staff
to make sure we are interpreting the Comprehensive Plan. It is our sense right now that
any shifts that we would have to do to accommodate that proposed mall and potential spin
off would affect most of Ada County. Certainly western Boise as well as Meridian, probably
Canyon County although typically we don't do that. So that is what I wanted to talk to you
about is we do need to do that follow up study. We are calling it a cumulative impact, we
are going to look at the sub -area rather than immediately around the site. We think we can
do that work probably by the end of June this month and get that committee together in a
couple of weeks. We are going to need your help, what I anticipate is once we have
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 21
completed the analysis we would like to bring it back to you and share the assumptions we
had to use and make sure you are comfortable with those before we complete the traffic
part of the analysis. I would be happy to answer any questions.
Kingsford: I guess Ery I commend you on the concerns and the study. I just wonder if we
are not premature, I know that they are knocking at our door, but having been through the
shopping center issues several times I hesitate to say it is good use of resources to study
something that may or may not take place. That coupled with the fact that numerous
studies have been done on Eagle Road twice for a mall at the site of St. Luke's and once
for a mall at the site of Fairview and Eagle Road. I just wonder about spending our
resources over studying issues that may or may not take place. If we can get a study
accomplished in a month or less it seems to me it would be a lot more timely to do that
Men it looks a little more eminent. Just a thought, Walt alerted me that this was coming
up the other day and I couldn't help but to think about the number of studies we have done
for malls on that particular strip.
Morrows I guess my questions and comments would be is that I too am concerned about
the premature study of something that is way out there and there are lots of hoops to go
through before this even comes close to becoming a reality. I think the other issue there
is for our purposes right now and thinking in particular of the mall that was at Fairview and
Eagle Road or the proposed one for that site it seems to me that with a minor amount of
updating those numbers would still be kind of applicable. I guess my question would be
you are talking about shifts, shifts from where in Ada County? What does a shift mean, in
my mind I am confused as to what are you shifting? Are you shifting employees from what
to what? Typically what happens or what I see happening on the basis of my business is
that in this type of a project most of those employees are secondary income type of jobs
substantial portion of them are recent high school graduates or school kids who have
never been an employee in the first place. So how do you shift them from what? I know
that I personally (inaudible) with a lot of the governmental agencies in Ada County but a
substantial portion of and with the press, the substantial portion of our growth in Ada
County is self generated by the mere fact that kids are staying home and our brothers and
sisters and parents are coming back home. Could you clarify for me what shift means?
Olen: I would be happy to, it is not an exact science, there is a lot of judgement. What we
do is we look at 20 years worth of growth, we rely a lot on Idaho Power's projection which
have an excellent track record if you look back at what they projected and the actual
growth. They are the best we have seen. We do for our planning purposes are always
looking 20 years ahead and looking at the total population and employment within Ada
County. When we have any major proposals come in that are significant and I think this
one is basically we use a zero sum for all of Ada County but we have to identify areas
where we assume that growth is going to go and shift that growth to the areas where at
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 22
least when a proposal like this comes in. It is done based on the combined experience in
judgement of that demographic advisory committee frankly. Our experience with the Boise
Town Square mall for example we assumed that there were going to be some areas that
were actually going to shift in retail employment because of the attraction of the mall and
we took it from existing development. In reality when they opened up there were some
areas that closed their doors because of increased competition. So we were able to be
somewhat reasonable in howwe estimated it. It is a little bit of a political trade off and the
only assumption we have is this zero sum. We don't want to plop in a 1500 employee
center and just add that to the total. That is not the way we would normally do that. Since
we monitor and update our projections every 4 or 5 years or whenever we feel it is
necessary we think our 20 year growth estimate is certainly reasonable. One thing we
don't do though and probably need to start looking at the influence on surrounding
counties particularly Canyon County has on development. If you look at the traffic report
they assume roughly 30% of the people who would go to this proposed mall would come
from adjacent counties. I think when you start adding significant retail it does affect
perhaps retail growth and surrounding counties as well. Walt, it is that kind of a process,
it is just sitting down with folks who are fairly knowledgeable to monitor this on a regular
basis and say if we plop 1500 retail employees at this location where do we take it from
realistically. That is what the group does so they maintain that zero sum balance they
don't actually add more than we started with they just shift things around.
Kingsford: So you are saying it is logical that a certain number of people that go and fight
the mess at Cole and Franklin that particularly (inaudible) might very well be shifted to
Eagle Road if this goes?
Olen: That is correct.
Tolsma: Did you do a study on what the outlet mall did out by Gown Road out there
(inaudible)
Olen: No sir we did not, that decision was actually made without going through this kind
of a process. We have since been working with the City and those folks a little bit on some
of their expansion plans. In fact the employment out there we did take into account in our
demographics. What we do is we split the employment into 2 categories, one is the office
type or non -retail is actually what we call it. The (inaudible) characteristics of that is
roughly 2 trips per individual. But retail employment it is about 7.7 times greater so the
retail employment is really significant and particularly in a concentration like this proposal
and we do. We have to find areas that in our collective judgement would not grow if this
were to go in. I think the influence area would be in western Boise and parts of Meridian
and probably realistically Canyon County, but we don't take that into account.
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 23
Tolsma: Considering all the growth that has been out there at Five Mile and Overland
(inaudible) going a mile down the road would that be a significant shift from that area to
this area or would it pull (inaudible).
Olen: I would speculate that it would probably more the potential retail growth in the west
bench area of Boise mostly but it probably affects some other areas of Boise. What we
have to do is find where we assume concentrations of retail employment over the next 10
or 20 years and shift some of that away from the areas we assumed in this location. Again,
to be honest it would affect I think the potential for some other areas of Meridian as well
if this were to go in.
Corrie: Erv, was your reasoning to do this follow up study and cumulations here based
upon your thoughts that it was going to happen quicker than it is? Since you said it takes
about a month to do this, were you anticipating this more than has been then we done
now?
Olen: Actually I hadn't considered that this was close to being a done thing at all. What we
had anticipated before a decision was made or gets to a point where seriously it is going
to be looked at. I think this kind of information is going to be a real value. So when you
folks in Planning and Zoning Commission are asked to make a decision it could be a big
different. If and when it gets to a point where it is gaining some credibility or support then
we would certainly advise that at some point if this thing goes forward that this analysis be
done.
Corrie: You also mention it wasn't done for the outlet factories, are they having
ramifications by not doing it now?
Olen: Well we do it after the fact, you have to plug that in once it is on the ground
(inaudible). One other quick comment the Ada County Highway District as I understand it
has agreed to pick up the consulting, transportation consultant to do the work. If they
choose to do that then our role would be to provide them with the demographic shifts to
do it. My understanding is they would pass the cost of that along to the developer or
applicant and so they still may choose to go forward with it. The last time I talked to them
they were proposing and if we are asked to do that we certainly want to work with you so
that we are sharing what we are doing with you and you are well aware of that. I can go
back and talk to them about maybe we don't need to look at it right now or wait until you
get to a point where this thing does appear to be a little more solid and has local support.
Corrie: Am I hearing you correctly this is not going to cost the City of Meridian anything?
Olen: No it is not, your contribution to Ada Planning Association includes this kind of
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 24
support and we kind of maintain that database and the demographics. So we provide that
service whenever there is a need to do that. We did it for your comprehensive plan
process for example, working with Mr. Forrey.
Kingsford: Well 1 think clearly that corridor is going to be very heavily used, I would
maintain constantly that is probably the best interchange, undeveloped interchange in
Idaho. I think to just focus on that particular corner it would be really limiting what ought
to be done on it. You have indicated it ought to be some of the other things but certainly
some consideration ought to be given to a range of possibilities in that whole corridor and
even as far south possibly at a minimum of Victory or Amity.
Olen: Absolutely
Kingsford: And again just to have the power mall drive it, I have seen too many malls that
didn't get built.
Olen: Well, it wouldn't bother me at all to go back to the Highway District and suggest that
let's stop and wait and see how far this gets. At some point we would certainly recommend
that if that is gaining support that kind of a study that you mentioned looking at a much a
little bit larger area and the potential so called spin off before a final decision is made. It
could have beneficial impacts frankly but it is a sign of things you need to be aware of and
we are certainly willing to support you.
Kingsford: I am not sure it is the type of thing that anybody looked at when they built the
Town Square mall.
Tolsma: Who did the study on the Town Square mall?
Olen: It was a combination effort, we actually did look at some spin off potential in the
initial studies on that I think back in the 80's I can't remember the date. APA was involved
in that and we looked at similar malls around the country and came up with a 2 to 1 spin
off in other words for every employee in the mall itself there would be another employee
somewhere around the immediate area. The 2 to 1 proved to be on the low side in
retrospect.
Morrow. 1 think Ron and Grant 1 want to address that issue a little bit, I think in fairness to
APA and ITD that I saw projections by someone within ITD concerning the very issues
prior to that mall being approved by Boise city. I think APA to their credit did some
forecasting their, I think what you have to do is lay that responsibility where it was Boise
City opted not to pay any attention to either one of those studies. Consequently we have
the mess that we have today.
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 25
Kingsford: They have the mess.
Morrow: We in Ada County, they in Boise City. So I support your concept here I too
(inaudible) Grant's thoughts I think it is a little premature until we get a little further down
the line. If I understood this proposal correctly on about 3/4 of the size of the existing town
square mall that will take a ton of work and a tone of financing and lots of pre -commitments
and gee those things usually take a couple of years based on the Town Square mall
experience.
Olen: Well, Mr. Mayor and Council members I will certainly take the message back that
you just don't think it is necessary at this point given the status of it and at such time as it
might get to a point where it is necessary to go to this step we would come back and solicit
your assistance with the technical part of it that we would have to do.
Corrie: It may be sooner than we think, I still think it is, but don't put it too far back.
Kingsford: I think clearly if it gets to a particular stage we are going to want that information
in the approval phase. But I just maintain that if it takes less than a month to do the study
than we are jumping the gun.
Morrow. One question, I would like to hear some comments from our staff people, they are
obviously the people that have to take this and run with it, Jim or Gary or Shari your
thoughts. Jim being Jim Johnson, Chief of our Planning and Zoning, Gary Smith the City
Engineer and Shari.
Johnson: Well, I have to concur that it is premature at this point. Frankly, I have a little
difficulty grasping what information can come from this study that might change or sway
the decision by Planning and Zoning as far as what our function would be in the project in
the application process. I can understand the need for it, down the road the plan for those
people involved in traffic studies and transportation, road development, improvement,
widening and that sort of thing. That really doesn't fall in our role of operation.
Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members I guess from my standpoint it seems like the
capacities of our water and sewer system are under siege right now and any time that we
can have a head of when the actual use is going to be utilized is going to be that much
better for us long term strategic planning. So if this mall goes in or some other mall goes
in it appears that area is destined for this kind of use. So, I would encourage if this
proposal is not an expense to the City of Meridian as Ery mentions that and I am not trying
to say that it needs to be done right away but that we need to keep our finger on the pulse
of what could happen out there so that we are not in trouble on sewer and water. I think
this use survey for traffic purposes would also assist us in the sewer and water planning
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 26
area.
Morrow. Gary, a comment to that, could we not get some of that data from Boise City with
respect to the sewer and water usages that the Town Square mall takes to give us some
pre -advanced notice of what the requirements might be?
Kingsford: I think you are talking different things though aren't you, they are multiple
restaurants in the Town Square and the theater would use different amounts. But if we
were to look at say uses of Costco, Homebase, Homeclub, those might be valid in the
number of square feet and the minimum needs.
Smith: If we have some kind of an idea of what kind of facilities will be out there we could
get a number from a similar use. I would assume that a traffic transportation study would
also have to identify those similar uses, is that correct Erv. It just seems like it takes a long
time to get from the point of let's build a mall to we got a mall. The infrastructure that is
needed to support that activity takes a long time to get it done. If it is going to impact our
waste water plant to the extent that we need facilities that takes a long time unfortunately.
Kingsford: But again we need to determine what those uses are because logically housing
impacts the waste water treatment plant more than retail shops not restaurants but retail
shops.
Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, while I know how much APA enjoys doing another study it
would have been nice, what is the spin off from, is the spin off from the fact that the
interchange was built. Is the interchange from St. Luke's coming out there, is the power
center a spin off from the fact there is going to be a hospital there. Obviously that
interchange was going to be developed and be very desirable for a lot of different uses.
But it is getting down to numbers on a traffic study would be very difficult in dealing with
Ada County Highway District their numbers were conflicting with what the traffic study had
shown prepared by Bell Walker because what they showed in their numbers, Costco alone
they showed it having 27,000 trips per day. Well 27,000 trips was the number of people
going down Franklin so they were assuming every person going down Franklin Road was
turning into Costco. As far as their numbers being accurate for something like that maybe
the Highway District needs something to interpret more accurately each use and what kind
of trips are involved with that. Until they know, until we have any tenants it would be real
difficult to tell, to pinpoint that if that is what you are trying to do.
Kingsford: 27,000 of those were going to Chili's. I think that is a real valid point Shari, kind
of what I was driving at not in a real clear manor. Do you want to say anything Chief?
Gordon: (Inaudible)
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 27
Kingsford: Thank you Ery we appreciate it.
ITEM #13: WATER/SEWER/TRASH DELINQUENCIES:
Kingsford: This is to inform you in writing if you choose to you have the right to a pre-
determination hearing at 7:30 P.M. June 6, 1995 before the Mayor and City Council to
appear in person and be judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that
your sewer, water and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain Council, the service will be
discontinued on June 14, 1995 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone from
the public that would like to contest their sewer, water or trash delinquency? Seeing none
I would entertain a motion on the turn off list.
Tolsma: So moved
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve the turn off list, all those in favor?
Opposed?
ITI
Kingsford: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City
reviewed by the Fourth Judicial Court pursuant to Idaho Code. Even though they appeal
their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list this month is $13,023.68.
ITEM #14: APPROVE BILLS:
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I move we approve the bills.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve the bills, all those in favor?
Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #15: DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
Kingsford: Mr. Smith
Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Council members, I have a couple of items that I need
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 28
to visit with you about this evening. The first one has to do with our Well No. 16, 1 am going
to pass out this little sketch of the location of the well so you can get re -acquainted with
it. Several meetings ago I brought before you a request from the developer who
contributed this or.donated this well site to the City of Meridian a request for a signature
of their declaration of covenants and restrictions and grant of easements. The donator is
Gemtone Inc. who is the developer of Treasure Valley Business Center, Thomas T. Wright
and E.L. Bews. The concern of the Council at that time was that the Gemtone Inc. had
given us along with the well lot the property to the west a strip 60 feet wide by about 164
feet in length which contains the Settlers Ditch. There was a question at that time that
concerned the piping of the Settlers Ditch which the Settlers Canal company was
requesting. I have since that Council meeting when I brought this before you I have met
with Tom Wright and Mr. Wright has advised me verbally and I wrote a letter to him as a
follow up that they would the the ditch When and if they were required to tile the remainder
of the ditch along their property. We would as a city owners of this well lot be responsible
to tile approximately 100 feet of the ditch passing through our property. Tom Wright
indicated that there was also a ditch along the east side of this property adjacent to Eagle
Road that would need to be tiled also. And so they recognize the responsibility to do that,
some liability he was concerned with as well. He was speaking to this responsibility based
on some comments that I made about the requirements that I made of having this well in
operation in this area. Obviously we have invested some money in the well at this point
to drill it. We have underground power out there to the site. His development needs this
well, the development of St. Luke's hospital needs this well. A future development of his
which would be Treasure Valley Business Center phase 2 to the south needs this well.
In short the water is needed out there and Tom recognizes that. He was willing to put forth
those comments. So my request this evening is to have the City Council agree to sign off
on these covenants to that I can get a pump in that well. The well, the pump house is all
designed, the plans and specifications are at DEQ for their approval. They will not release
and approval until I present them with a copy of the deed for their property. I can't get the
deed for the property until these covenants are designed by the City. So that is where I
am.
Corrie: Is this Well No. 16, if I understand you correctly this one supplies St. Luke's for the
water?
Smith: Well, it will, it will be the closest well to their site. Right now there is a pipe
extending to their site that has water in it without a whole lot of pressure.
Corrie: This is the main one plus the industrial buildings that are being built. I am sure the
Mayor is aware of the situation with St. Luke's and the building and water and fire codes.
Kingsford: Well that is also true on Commercial Court.
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 29
Corrie: Right this is the well that we are talking about.
Smith: We are going to have to do something with pressure in this area too. It is not just
the water supply but also pressure. This well site will either be a, I am talking very
preliminarily to the design engineer about a variable frequency controlled motor on this
pump that would actually operate off of pressure in the area rather than liquid level in the
tank. I visited a little bit with Grant about the possibility of locating a tank at St. Luke's site
and utilizing the well that Ed Bews has on his property to pump into that tank and then
boost out of that tank into the system also. So we haven't decided absolutely on a method
here but we do know that we have pressure problems out there and that we need to get
them rectified as soon as possible.
Kingsford: Entertain a motion to approve the covenants.
Morrow. So moved
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to approve the declaration of covenants and
restrictions for the grant of easement for Well No. 16, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Council, the next item that I have, I think I am in the right
order concerns a reservation fee for Storey Park. I passed this out earlier but let me give
you another copy in case you have misplaced the first one. I had two items on this memo
but the Storey Park picnic shelter reservation fee was the one that I have on the agenda
for this evening. The other one I might just consider that as some point of interest for you
for your consideration. I think we, Will and I had Dennis count last year's reservations
from the park and he logged about 400. We have on the weekends we have a part time
employee that cleans up and dumps trash in the mornings Saturday and Sunday morning
cleans out the restrooms and then if necessary he comes back Saturday and Sunday and
clears trash again. His, he is a contract employee and his contract runs about $2000 or
slightly more than that a year a summer basically. This would help pay his contract cost.
Some users of the park are very conscientious and pick up after themselves, some are not
which is always the case. Our cap on our budget may affect us this year, we are not sure
exactly what is going to happen. This is a nominal fee, I think it is something that we
should consider doing to help off set some of the costs. We get, I don't know what the
percentage of folks from outside the area are but we do get companies from Boise and
other areas besides Meridian coming in to use our park for picnics, particularly company
picnics, a lot of family reunions and that sort of thing. I don't know that the reason we get
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 30
them is because we don't have a fee, I believe Boise Parks is charging a fee for their
reservations. Something like, depending on the number of tables that you have I believe
but is up in the $30 to $35 1 think. So I guess I would be willing to try and answer any
questions you have.
Kingsford: Have you given any consideration Gary to and I guess that is a dumb question
because people are not going to necessarily know how many people show up. ' It seems
to me it ought to be a different amount if it is 10 people and if it is for example the Meridian
High School senior class that forages out there with 400 kids. A whole lot different than
having a family get together with 15 or 20.
Smith: I haven't given any though to that. I didn't think, well $10 was going to be a breaker
for anybody if it was even a small group. But typically
Kingsford: When they get the shelter and they reserve they are usually a fairly good size.
Smith: I was going to say, I can't recall how many tables are under the shelters but under
the shelters and around the shelter there is probably room for I think at least 8 tables that
would fit under the shelter. You can put 8 people on each one of those things so you are
talking 50 to 60 people in a shelter without much problem at all.
Yerrington: Can we get $20 just as easily as we get $10
Kingsford: Max is always thinking.
Yerrington: Well if they have a shelter I don't see anything wrong with that
Smith: I think my, and it is very possible Max that we could. My thought was that they are
paying something and maybe that, I don't know what kind of impact that has on the user
whether they figure they can do more with the shelter than they felt they could have if they
weren't paying anything.
Kingsford: And the way of litter and clean up. I guess my concern is Max is if you start, I
wouldn't have a problem with $10 on a shelter regardless if it was 10 or 15 or 100. If you
go up at some point then I think we need to make a designation and try to set categories.
Morrow. I think I have some conceptual problems with this. I guess the first one would be
do the other areas charge fees and if so how much are those fees? The second things is
that what happens to the argument of the guy who says I pay property taxes for the right
to use this and I pay substantial property taxes. The third concept is that we probably have
more companies from here utilizing Boise City parks than we have Boise companies using
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 31
our parks. The issue with the split fee system is one of police power thing. How the heck
are we going to enforce or are we going to have to add more personnel to accomplish what
seems to be an innocent enough goal at the very beginning. So all of the sudden it
becomes a vicious cycle of more fees for more people because we have to add more
people to make sure we are getting the right fees. So I think those are all questions that
evolve. Part of the argument there and I guess part of my observation is that our
resources and people are stretched to the max as it is are we adding more administrative
cost and not having our people capable of doing the jobs satisfactorily that they have been
assigned to already. So I need some assurances in terms of these administrative type
things that they in a sense are going to work and not cost us more than we are going to
get.
Kingsford: I think in part to answer your question is if a person wants to call and reserve
and see that they will have a particular spot at a particular time there is an administrative
cost born by us to go out there. First off we have made a little deal to put those in,
secondly the Parks Superintendent has to put that on his calendar and go out and deal
with that. That takes a certain amount of time. I agree with you in the concept of just using
the park. If there is spacing go out and use it. In terms of those shelters and if you are
going to be a reservation we had this discussion 6 to 7 years ago whether or not to even
have reservations. I guess that may be something discussed again. If we are going to
have reservations I don't see anything wrong with paying a nominal sum to take care of
Dennis or Rick's time in setting up the calendar and reserving it and to make sure that
someone goes out there and actually physically cleans up and makes it presentable again
that portion. I agree with you in terms of the general concept of parks. I don't know, one
of two things needs to happen, you never have them be a base where is pays its own way.
Where we are limited in budget now at 3% cap maybe it ought to come a little closer and
not be born entirely by property tax payers that may or may not ever go to a city park.
Morrow: The other question I would through out here is that assuming we adopt impact
fees than I can see the argument by the new home buyer that says gee not only did I pay
for the shelter and then I pay property taxes to maintain it but now you are asking me to
support them. I am throwing out these arguments that can easily occur and you have to
have valid answers for. So let's get the answers before we institute.
Kingsford: I think the whole thing is the only way you have to pay a fee is if it is reserved
for you.
Tolsma: They are not paying for the shelters, the shelters are donated back to the City by
business groups.
Morrow: Well, you are paying an impact fee you are paying for the (inaudible) whatever
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 32
it is that gets there and so on and so forth.
Tolsma: (Inaudible) federal camp ground that does not have facilities it does not cost
anything, but if you stay at one with facilities it (inaudible).
Morrow. None of those folk who instituted that ever had to answer to the taxpayer on the
basis that we do Ron. I understand what you are saying and I understand the art of hiding
behind bureaucracy, but we don't have that here. We are accountable to the tax payer
and so those are questions I think we need to answer.
Tolsma: The Whole park is open except for the shelter. If you want the convenience it costs
a little extra. (Inaudible) it was put there by service organizations and the City.
Corrie: Mr. Mayor, last year I used that shelter, I reserved it and I would have been willing
to pay $10. There were other people in the park outside of our group over next to us
having a good time as well and pretty soon we all got together at the same time. I have
no problem with a $10 fee for the shelter. I can relate to what Walt is saying but I don't
think it is that big of a problem. I think we need to get something out of this to help the free
some of that cost and at that point to get this thing on board I will move that we have a fee
of $10 to reserve either of the 2 centers there in Story Park
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Point of discussion, when would you have that go into effect, next budget year?
Corrie: We could have it for October 1 st of this year, of 1995.
Kingsford: So logically then that would go into effect this season.
Morrow Questions with respect to this, don't we have to amend the ordinance to put this
into the ordinance or do we have to have a public hearing for this type of thing? What
makes this different then when we adjust water and sewer fees and those types of things?
(End of Tape)
Crookston: I would really have to take a look at it but I believe that a fee of this nature
would not require a public hearing. It might be advisable to have one if you think it should
have one. I haven't looked at the ordinances that relate to the park so I don't know
particularly whether or not it would require an ordinance to put the fee into effect.
Kingsford: I think probably it would be appropriate to withdraw the motion and second and
have the counselor report to us on what would need to be done at the next meeting, is that
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 33
satisfactory or do you want to go into the vote?
Corrie: I will withdraw, I have no problem of looking into it as far as we need to. I don't
want to study it to death either. I think that would be fine.
Smith: Is that item done then?
Kingsford: Yes, I guess we will hear back from Wayne at the next meeting as to what it
would be that we have to do and a vote will probably be taken.
Smith: On the other item I have is on June 1st we opened bids for sewer cleaning and
television inspection of some of our sewer lines in the City. I have the results of that and
I will pass those out now. We had 3 plan holders and one plan holder was not licensed
as a public works contractor in the State of Idaho, he was out of Utah so he did not submit
a bid. The low bidder is MSCI from Meridian and their bid is $14,564.30. The other bidder
from Gelco from Salem Oregon $29,945.80. MSCI is a new company starting up and they
wanted to get started and they don't have a problem with their bid. The bid amounts were
all checked, the extensions and the totals, the addition were all checked, everything
checked alright. So, what we have for your information 24,835 feet of 8 inch pipe to clean
and inspect, 22,050 feet of 10 inch pipe, 19,015 of 12 inch pipe all of these will be cleaned
and a T.V. camera run through the pipe and pictures and videotapes taken and analyzed
for repairs and or replacement of pipes.
Morrow: Question here, I am apprehensive about that one bid is 50% of the other one?
Smith: Correct.
Morrow. And you have confirmed beyond a shadow that is okay?
Smith: They have filled out their, there was a request for information qualification
information from the contractor which was completely filled out and the consultants
checked that. There doesn't' seem to be any problems. The people that are involved in
it, at least one of the principles is a Boise City employee that has been involved in this
work for years and years.
Morrow: Are we requiring a performance bond?
Smith: Yes sir.
Morrow. For the specs?
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 34
Smith: Yes
Morrow: So you don't have any reservations about this?
Smith: No
Morrow: Fine with me.
Kingsford: Entertain a motion to approve the apparent low bidder.
Morrow. Mr. Mayor I will move that we approve MSCI as the apparent low bidder for the
sewer cleaning and television inspection in the amount of $14,564.30, and we authorize
the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve the apparent low bidder MSCI in
the amount of $14,564.30 for sewer cleaning and television work on sewer lines, authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and attest, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Council members, the last item I have is in Central
Valley Corporate Park, Nahas' development there is a plat that was filed, No. 2 and No.
3 that the combination of the 2 involves a short culdesac street culdesac. They are wanting
to re -plat that area into a different lot configuration. Part of the re -plat would be the request
through the Highway District to vacate that roadway. In order for the Highway District to
do this I have been advised by our legal counsel that we need to have a consent from the
City Council so that the Highway District can proceed with the vacation of the roadway
which would then be followed by vacation of the plat as I understand it. Let me pass this
out so you can see (inaudible). The plat of Central Valley Corporate Park continues to be
an evolving process. The yellowed portion is Headway Court which is the roadway in
consideration for vacation. Presently there is no construction on Headway Court other
than a stub off of South Progress Way which is that north -south street paralleling East
First. Sewer and water were stubbed into that little I think the (inaudible) radius is on the
curb and gutter were built and that is as far as it goes. It has been excavated slightly, the
roadway was excavated but there were no improvements made.
Kingsford: Should our utilities then be taken back to the street and capped there Gary
rather than have, is that something we can have a (inaudible) in water and that sort of
thing?
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 35
Smith: That is a good question Mr. Mayor, the concept that the developer has provided to
me indicates that the water, it will be a roadway a common ingress egress roadway to
some retail shops.
Kingsford: So sewer and water vvill be used.
Smith: Yes, it could be extended in. It would be in an easement rather than in a public right
of way.
Morrow: So this is kind of like a private drive.
Smith: Correct
Morrow: A condominium kind of drive where each shop may own its own parcel and a
piece of the drive is that what we are getting at?
Smith: Well, yes, they first approached Shari and I about lot line adjustments and there
were a whole lot of lot line adjustments that they wanted to make. It was my attitude and
I think Shari agrees with me that needs to be a re -plat just from the magnitude of the
adjustments. That is what I have told them, the applicant's engineer and they came back
and said we need to have your approval to vacate the roadway. Wayne advised me that
we need your formal consent so that the Highway District could proceed with the vacation
process.
Crookston: The Highway District is going to go through the vacation process.
Smith: They would have to because it is a dedicated roadway by platting processes.
Crookston: The plat has been recorded.
Smith: Correct
Crookston: That would have to be done.
Tolsma: This is right across the street from that Mercy Medical?
Smith: Yes sir that is correct.
Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we instruct the City Clerk or Attorney to draft up a
letter of consent for the vacation in of Headway Court.
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 36
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to, who do you want to have Wayne do you
want to do it or Will, Will is cheaper?
Crookston: Have at her Will.
Kingsford: Write a letter to the (inaudible) reflecting these minutes that the Council is
approving vacation of Headway Court, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Anything else?
Smith: Just a comment I guess you got a copy of the letter I received from our
geotechnical engineer on the Tully Park test hole boring.
Kingsford: Where does that leave us with that Gary?
Smith: I am not sure, I guess I would be available or open to any suggestions you might
have. The only other thing I can do at this point is to DEQ a call and see what that does
do.
Kingsford: I can't believe that those kinds of contaminations would take place the entire
stretch of that ditch. Yet how else did it get there unless at some point in time somebody
just dumped, when there was no water in there and it seeped.
Smith: We did have quite a at Third Street and Fairview we had quite a concentration of
hydrocarbons there. We also have a gas facility on the north side of Fairview that is
immediately adjacent to the ditch.
Kingsford: (Inaudible) historically a few places that could have contaminated years ago,
the north curve used to have a Texaco station right in the middle of that for years. That
was ancient, it could have very well done some contamination. I know that when they dug
those tanks out the attitude was considerably different about ground contamination and
I know they had leaked extensively. (Inaudible)
Smith: With your blessings 1 will go ahead and contact DEQ and see what is up.
Kingsford: I guess I would ask Gary for us to proceed with our project we can't, why
couldn't you go ahead even though there is contamination that is not our responsibility to
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 37
clean up is it?
Smith: I don't know.
Kingsford: I don't see us opening up a hornets nest when it is a ditch. That should be
between the irrigation folks and DEQ to remedy. I don't see us having to pursue that or
shouldn't have to.
Smith: As I understand it the property our property line is the north side of the ditch, the
ditch is actually on our property, Five Mile Creek is in an (inaudible).
Kingsford: Bless you for saying that.
Tolsma: Did they (inaudible)
Smith: No, When they went out to bore the sub -surface there was no indication that there
was any problem. And so they just followed a standard procedure of getting their well rig
above where the abutments for the pedestrian bridge would be and drilled down on both
sides of the bed of the creek. They took the samples and returned them to the office. The
samples were placed in these little ziplock baggies like we carry sandwiches in and they
sat in the baggies for 3 days I believe before they took them out to start processing them
for the lab work and it was at that point that they noticed the odor. They took their little
photoionization detector and came up with that number. So there wasn't any inclination
at all that there was a problem there. If they had thought there was a problem they would
have utilized a cleaner method of sampling before they actually steam cleaned all of their
utensils and make sure everything is clean when they start the drilling process. I guess
there is some kind of different recovery process for the soil samples too that they use.
Morrow: Gary and I did discuss this so he is aware that I will make you aware of this. On
a couple of my construction sites we've had to drill for soils testing and this has been
within the downtown Boise area for designs, pour concrete mixes and those kinds of things
and discovered the same types of things. The long and short of it was all it did was affirm
that the stuff was there, it is all under the City of Boise and it wasn't traceable. So it was
write up the report and turn it in and press on as usual. That is a historical thing that has
happened that I have been personally involved in. In terms of Gary and my conversations
with respect to this I don't know how the heck you would ever trace where that stuff is
coming from. It could come from old farm tanks that may have been underground
somewhere on the property or up stream or whatever.
Kingsford: Ron and I determined, of course he was pre -petroleum and he said that there
hadn't been any farm tanks out there. Of course (inaudible)
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 38
Morrow: Residential fuel tanks I suppose, I don't know, it come from any place.
Kingsford: Somebody just could have decided that would be a good place to dump it.
Tolsma: (Inaudible) if they could pick anything up.
Kingsford: 1 suspect that DEQ is going to do that anyway.
Morrow: So I guess the answer to the question is where does that leave us now, do we
do anything, do we send the letter to DEQ or what do we do?
Kingsford: What is our consultant tell us?
Smith: He is ignorant on the fact, he doesn't know what the process is as far as DEQ is
concerned. Our pathway consultant is not sure, the geotech said that obviously it is up to
us to notify DEQ. If we don't then he will because of his ethical moral code that he has
found something that he needs to let the State know about.
Kingsford: We had better send that in then.
Corrie: I think Wait is probably (inaudible)
Smith: But the net result of all of this maybe like Walt said on this particular project we
are not really impacting the ground. We are not building a structure, it is there we don't
know how it got to be there it may be everywhere.
Kingsford: So we notify them and just proceed with our project.
Smith: Unless they tell me something different, yes sir.
Kingsford: Let's move along that direction then.
Tolsma: This isn't going to be like (inaudible)?
Smith: I certainly hope not.
Corrie: Before Gary gets away I have one question, your letter on this Storey Park was
dated April 6, was a business license ever presented to the Council?
Smith: No sir, I just tossed that in your box and kind of food for thought and I didn't hear
anything so I didn't pursue that. I did want to come back and re -visit about the reservation
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 39
fee issue.
Corrie: I will pursue that a little bit later.
Smith: I think that would help us in some regards. Thank you Mr. Mayor and Council.
Kingsford: Chief?
Gordon: Nothing
Kingsford: Jim
Johnson: (Inaudible)
Kingsford: Public hearings on those Jim?
Johnson: (Inaudible)
Kingsford: Shari?
Stiles: Nothing
Kingsford: Wayne?
Crookston: The only thing I wanted to mention was the Magistrate's Court facility, the City
Attorney for Garden City was going to bring this up before the Garden City Council
meeting tonight and get back to me. I have indicated what the Council talked about at the
strategic planning meeting I believe on the 30th of May. I have told him about that and he
is going to get with me tomorrow to tell me what the Garden City Council's proposal or view
of it is.
Kingsford: Mr. Morrow?
Morrow. A couple of things, for informational purposes, the latest completion dates for
construction that is in our area. Meridian railroad crossing is still June 15th, begins to look
like they are going to utilize all of that time to complete that project. Cherry lane is
September 15th by contract date. This is not in our area but Franklin Road, Maple Grove
to Five Mile is June 30th, so hopefully we will get some help there in terms of lightening
some of the load headed east. Between July 1 st and August 15th we will see an overlay
on Chateau Drive, both of those sections of Chateau Drive. So that is latest information
with respect to construction in our area from ACRD. The second item would be I am
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 40
assuming that there is no information on the personnel manual tonight so we are going to
ship that stuff out to the Department Heads for their input.
Kingsford: I think that Bob had one item, you gave that to Will didn't you Bob?
Corrie: I gave it to Anna.
Kingsford: It is my expectation then that will be given to the Department Heads tomorrow
afternoon at the meeting.
Morrow. And then they will have what period of time for their input before we see it again?
Kingsford: Let's see if we can't culminate this thing on the first meeting in July does that
seem reasonable?
Morrow. So then we will have information back from them to us so that we can digest that
information and make our final recommendations at the first meeting of July.
Kingsford: Right
Morrow: And then we would adopt the second meeting in July.
Kingsford: Correct. I guess that is a good point that Will has brought up, that might be the
most workable scenario is if those people work with their Commissioner and or the Mayor
in case of City Hall people and work that through so that they have a little feeling and you
have a little feeling for what they are about and see if that is far fetched or whatever from
your view point. Then bring that back in still on that time line, the first meeting in July and
adopt the second. Anything else Walt?
Morrow No that is it.
Kingsford: Max?
Yerrington: Nothing sir.
Kingsford: Bob?
Corrie: Nothing
Kingsford: Ronald?
Meridian City Council
June 6, 1995
Page 41
Tolsma: Nothing
Kingsford: I would like to have a motion of approval if I could from the Council for our
minutes as we discussed at the work session on the Whitzel property.
Morrow: So moved
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve of the gift of the Whitzel property
corner of East 1 st and Idaho Street to the City of Meridian and the City to indemnify the
Whitzel's on that property, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: Counselor based on that I talked with Julie Weston today and she had called
me and I told I thought that was forthcoming this evening and their attorney out of Boise
and his name escapes me right at the moment he will be contacting you. Mr. Berg?
Berg: Nothing
Kingsford: I would entertain the infamous motion.
Corrie: So moved
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to adjourn, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:26 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
ATTEST:
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., -CITY CLERK